Loading...
City Council Packet - 04/12/1982 N TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on REGULAR MEETING AGENDA an agenda item needs to sign their name on APRIL 12, 1982 the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL sheet is provided, ask to be recognized by LECTURE ROOM the Chair. I. SPECIAL MEETING: 1.1 Call To Order and Roll Call 1 .2 Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 Call To Audience, Staff and Council For Non-Agenda Items Under Open Agenda 2. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted. in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be re- moved for discussion and separate action. Motion to: 2. 1 Approve Minutes: March 29, 1982 2.2 Approve the Expenditures and Investments $ 335,096.09 2.3 Approve Insurance Renewal - Fire & Extended-CoverageT 2.4 Approve Resolution No. 82- Appointments for Library Board 2.5 Approve Bid Specs on Architectural Barrier Removal 2.6 Approve OLCC Application and Authorize Mayor to Sign o Town & Country Days - Special Event License Application 2.7 Receive and File: • Transmittal from Steve Crew, Attorney at Law,- D.M. Thompson Inc. , litigation o Transmittal from Tigard Water District re: water service 72nd Ave.(2 letters) s Transmittal from Western International Properties re: 72nd Ave see Item ,'.= 10 2.8 Approve Resolution No. 82- Accepting Improvements on Scheckla Park Estates 2.9 Approve Uniform Bid Packet on Reconditioning of Existing Streets 3. NEWSLETTER TITLE ® City Administrator 4. PACIFIC-ATLANTA LID PETITION ® Director of Public Works 5. KNOLL DRIVE LID ORDINANCE No. 82- ADOPTING FINAL ASSESSMENTS a Director of Public Works 6. HILLVIEW LID ORDINANCE No. 82- ADOPTING FINAL ASSESSMENTS o Director of Public Works 7. McDONALD SEWER LID DISCUSSION CONTINUED FROM MARCH 22, 1982 (Ordinance No. 82- Adopting Final Assessments) e Director of Public Works 8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING 8. HOODVIEW SANITARY SEWER LID PUBLIC HEARING a Public Hearing-Opened 6 Summation by Director of Public Works; Public Testimony; Opponents; Proponents; Cross Examination; Recommendation of Director of Public Works. o Public Hearing Closed e Consideration by Council ® Ordinance No. 82- Creating District 9. 72ND LID ASSESSMENT • Director of Public Works 10. SIGN CODE/BUSINESS CODE ENFORCEMENT POLICY DISCUSSION- Settlemire, Ginger's rloc!rs o City Administrator 11 . ORDINANCE No. 82- SIGN CODE - TIME EXTENSION NON-CONFORMING SIGNS 0 City Administrator RECESS COUNCIL MEETING 12. TURA 14EETING: ` • TURA Roll Call • Advisory Committee Appointments • Budget Process - Discussion ® Schedule meeting with City Council/TURA and TURA Advisory Committee - Wednesday, April 28, 1982, 7:30 P.M. ® Adjournment TURA Meeting RECONVENE COUNCIL MEETING 13. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair under item 1 .3 will be discussed at this time. All persons are encouraged to contact the City Administrator prior to the meeting. 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Personnel & Labor Relations per ORS 192.660(2)(a) , and Real Property transactions per ORS 192.660(1)(e). 15. ADJOURNMENT T I G A R D C I T Y C 0 U N C I L REGULAR MEETING MINUTES — APRIL 12, 1982 — 7:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilors Tom Brian (arriving, at 7:38 PM) , John Cook, Nancie Stimler, Kenneth Scheckl : Director of Public Works/ Planning, Frank Currie; Finance Director/City Recorder, Doris Hartig; City Administrator, Robert Jean; Legal Cou ,sel, Tim Ramis; Office Manager, Loreen Wilson. 2. CALL TO AUDIENCE, STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NOPT AGENDA ITEMS UNDER OPEN AGENDA (a) City Administrator requested following items be placed on open agenda: .1 Report on the K-9 Dog Program with the Police Department (b) Mr. Jeff Kleinman, 729 S.W. Alder, Portland, renresPnti-ng Mr. Galton and l.r. Meekcoms regarding issue concerning condemnation of land on the S.W. Varns Street LID. He submitted a letter to council and briefly outlined matter noting that the property has been condemned by the State of Oregon for the 72nd Avenue overpass and there is disagreement now as to the true benefit to the property from the LID process since it is now condemned. City Administrator stated that staff was not aware this was going to be dis— cussed this evening and requested Council allow staff to study the issue and report back. Consensus of Council was to discuss this matter further on April 19, 1952. (c) Councilwoman Stimler requested item 2.9 from the consent agenda be placed under open agenda as item .2. 3. APPROVE MINUTES: March 29, 1982 (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 4. APPROVE THE EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS: $335,096.09 (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 5. APPROVE INSURANCE RENEWAL — FIRE & EXTENDED COVERAGE (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to approve renewal. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 6. RESOLUTION No. 82-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE TIGARD LIBRARY BOARD. (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to approve Resolution No. 82-3i and appoint Dorene Thomas to the Library Board for a term expiring June 30, 1984. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 7. APPROVE BID SPECS ON ARCHITECTURAL BARRIER REMOVAL (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 8. APPROVE OLCC APPLICATION AND AUTHORIZE MAYOR TO SIGN - Town and Country Days - Special Event License Application. (a) Motion by Council Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to approve and authorize signature of Mayor. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 9. RECEIVE AND FILE: o Transmittal from Steve Crew, Attorney At Law - D.M. Thompson Inc. , litigation. o Transmittal from Tigard Water District re: Water Service 72nd Ave. (2 letters) o Transmittal from Western International Properties re: 72nd Avenue (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to receive and file. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 10. RESOLUTION No. 82-32 RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED WITHIN SCHECKLA PARK ESTATE, SUBJECT TO HEREIN SPECIFIED CONDITIONS. (a) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to approve. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 11. NEWSLETTER TITLE (a) City Administrator presented the suggestions submitted by citizens for the City newsletter. Staff suggested the name "All About Town". (b) After some discussion, Councilor Cook moved to use the name "All About Town" for the City of Tigard Newsletter. Motion seconded by Councilor Scheckla. Motion passed by 4-1 majority vote of Council, Councilor Brian voting nay. 12. PACIFIC -ATLANTA LID PETITION (a) Director of Public Works advised Council that staff has received a petition from an LID to connect the existing S.W. 69th Avenue with S.W. 68th Avenue at Atlanta Street to facilitate the development of the adjacent properties. He requested Council accept the petition and allow staff to develop more details on LID. (b) Mr. Carl Johnson, 6I55 S.W. Bonita, Lake Grove, stated he owned property in the area and was concerned that other property owners might need the street extension completed further down to facilitate the improvements of additional property. (c) Staff advised Council they would work with Mr. Johnson and other property owners in the area in examining the proposed boundary of the LID. PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 12, 1982 (d) Motion by Counilor Stimler, seconded by Councilor Cook to receive the petition and authorize staff to continue working on project. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 13. ORDINANCE NO. 82-15 AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE FINAL COST OF SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN THE SOUTHWEST KNOLL DRIVE SANITARY SEWER LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, RATIFYING AND ADOPTING THE APPORTIONMENT AND ASSESS- MENT OF THE COST TO RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE DISTRICT, SPREADING THE ASSESSMENT AND DIRECTING THE ENTRY OF ASSESSMENTS IN THE LIEN DOCKET. (a) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt. (b) Director of Public Works noted that this would be for 20 years at 10% interest. City Administrator stated if the City was unsuccessful in selling bonds for 20 years at 10% interest the City would go for bid on a 10 year bond. (c) Councilor Brian requested staff prepare a schedule of payments and costs to the City for bonds that are sold at 10 years and 20 years so that Council can see the difference in expense. Motion to adopt approved by unanimous vote of Council. 14. ORDINANCE NO. 82-16 AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE FINAL COST OF SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN THE SOUTHWEST HILLVIEW SANITARY SEWER LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, RATIFYING AND ADOPTING THE APPORTIONMENT AND ASSESS- MENT OF THE COST TO RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE DISTRICT, SPREADING THE ASSESSMENT AND DIRECTING THE ENTRY OF ASSESSMENTS IN THE LIEN DOCKET. (a) Philip S. Westover, 10340 S.W. Hillview, expressed appreciation to Council for keeping to the original 20 year payment plan. Thomas A. Jurhs, 10330 S.W. Hillview, expressed appreciation also. (b) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 15. McDONALD SEWER LID DISCUSSION CONTINUED FROM MARCH 22, 1982, MEETING (a) Director of Public Works gave synopsis of issue's history and noted that the estimated project cost was $194,400 with the final assessments coming in at $146,448. He advised Council that originally 72 properties were included in the LID boundaries, however, two of the lots were not platted in a new sub- division as originally planned and this made the final assessment split be- tween 70 lots. This effected the final cost per lot by increasing the cost from $2,034.00 to $2,092.11. Director advised Council that the public hearing was continued to give oppor- tunity for persons to be heard to remonstrate against the method of assessment used. PAGE 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 12, 1982 (b) Norman Janzen, 9910 S.W. McDonald, questioned the engineering cost computa- tions on the project and noted that they seemed excessive for the size of the project. Staff and Council discussed the amount of e-gineering costs and what the breakdown of those costs were. (c) Mayor Bishop stated he would like to see the engineer cost breakdown and felt the citizens had a right to see this information. (d) Richard Stack, 10265 S.W. View Terrace, spoke to Council regarding the high engineering costs. (e) Mary Burnham, 14235 S.W. 97th Avenue, requested time to see the engineering cost breakdown. (f) Discussion followed regardin the costs for the engineering and staff mentioned that 237 of the total project cost did not seem out of line. Council question- ed if the ordinance were passed, if they could come back at a later date and re-spread the assessment if citizens proved the engineering costs were un- fair. Staff noted that if there are any irregularities the citizens could come back to the Council and discuss. (g) ORDINANCE NO. 82-17 AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE FINAL COST OF SEWER IMPROVE- MENTS FOR THE SOUTHWEST McDONALD STREET SANITARY SEWER LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, RATIFYING AND ADOPTING THE APPORTIONMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF THE COST TO RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE DISTRICT, SPREADING THE ASSESS- MENT AND DIRECTING THE ENTRY OF ASSESSMENTS IN THE LIEN DOCKET. (h) Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Brian to adopt Ordinance No. 82-17 with the amended lien docket, showing 70 lots instead of 72. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. ( i) City Administrator is to report back to Council at the April 26, 1982, meeting regarding any concerns citizens have with the engineering cost breakdown. PUBLIC HEARING 8:43 P.M. 16. HOODVIEW SANITARY SEWER LTD PUBLIC HEARING (a) Public Hearing Opened (b) Director of Public Works gave synopsis of project noting the improvements would be made to six lots. He stated the purpose of the public hearing was to give an opportunity to receive remonstrances regarding the formation of the district. (c) Public Testimony: PAGE 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 12, 1982 Proponent: Peggy Hendricks, 10125 S.W. Hoodview, stated her property was not in the proposed district and expressed interest in having sewer connection available for her property. Director of Public Works stated that this would not be possible with this improvement, but that he would work with her to form a district in her area. (d) Public Hearing Closed (e) Director of Public Works recommended Council approve formation of the district. (f) ORDINANCE NO. 82-18 AN ORDINANCE CONFIR14ING AND RATIFYING THE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF MARCH 22, 1982, WITH RESPECT TO S.W. HOODVIEW SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID #32) ; APPROVING, RATIFYING AND ADOPTING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SAID SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM; DECLARING RESULTS OF HEARING HELD WITH RESPECT THERETO; DIRECTING SOLICITATION OF BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION; PROVIDING FOR THE MAKING OF SAID IMPROVEMENTS, AND DECLAR- ING AN EMERGENCY. (g) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Scheckla to adopt Ordinance No. 82-18 and amend last paragraph on page 2 by noting Ordinance was read 'two' times by number and title only instead of 'three ' . Approved by unanimous vote of Council. RECESS: 8:52 P.M. RECONVENE: 9:05 P.M. 17. 72ND LID ASSESSMENT (a) Director of Public Works advised Council that purpose of meeting was to con- sider objections for the method of distributing the assessments on 72nd Avenue LID. He briefly explained the method used by the engineer as follows: Based upon a property's proximity to the improvement with the abutting 200 feet being assessed a share relative to the cost of a local street (50% of that cost on the front footage and 50% of the cost on the area of the front 200 feet) ; the remaining amount being shared by all properties equally on a square foot or area basis. He noted that the cost portion of the local street is $1 . 137 million. Director of Public Works stated that property owners had requested on March 29th that the City submit other proposals or methods of assessment for their consideration. Some suggestions were: basis of area, assessed value, un- developed land, traffic generation, etc. Council requested staff figure the costs on the area basis and Director presented that set of figures to Council. He encouraged the Council to make their decision on the merits of the method of assessment rather than the amount on any particular piece of property. t PAGE 5 - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 12, 1982 Staff and Council discussed further, the initial method of assessment and the area basis method presented by staff. (b) Mayor Bishop requested the record show that he has business relationships with two property owners in the LID area but will vote on this issue as he does not feel this is in conflict of interest. (c) PUBLIC TESTIMONY: OPPONENTS: Paul Rask, Attorney representing Samack Inc. , ID #66, stated the proposed assessment district was too narrow in scope and suggested that the City as a whole benefits from the project and requested the boundaries be reset to include the whole City. He stated that Samack would try this issue in the court system and felt the Court would find the boundaries arbitrary and would attack the formula also. Mayor Bishop noted that due to the lateness of the hour, he would limit time for each person to three minutes. Mike Schmire, representing Bingham Investment Co. , ID #54, objected that the street is already 44 feet wide in front of Bingham's property and that they shouldn't have to pay for the widening of the street again. They upheld the area method of assessment. Fred Eisen, relinquished his position to speak due to the lateness of the hour. Lenore Warner, declined to speak. Don Peterson, was not present. Hy Sadoff, relinquished position. Lorraine Greco, did not speak. Margaret Dickoff, did not speak. Guy Greco, 13425 S.W. 72nd Avenue, ID #5, stated the method was "like a bunch of Gestapos". Bob Williams, representing Western International Properties, ID 412, gave history of the development and questioned the benefiting of the properties by the improvement. Roland Rose's, consultant engineer for Ted Nelson Company, 14280 S.W. 72nd Avenue, noted his opposition to the corner lot on Bonita and 72nd. He advised Council that the assessment should be figured on the 'front yard' of the development which would be less front footage than the 'side yard' which was used in the computing of the assessment. He stated that he pre- ferred the area assessment since it more nearly identifies the useable portion of the land. t PAGE 6 - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 12, 1982 Tony Maksym, 13565 S.W. 72nd Avenue, ID #8, noted methods requested were not presented by staff and requested Council consider other alternatives and study the issue closer due to the special benefit concerns along 72nd and the type of road being developed. John Smets, 6830 S.W. Bonita, asked if any federal grants had been received and stated he was opposed to the magnitude of the development. He suggested that the area method of assessment seemed fair. Staff reported that no federal grants had been used in the LID area. (d) Mayor Bishop stated that the initial method of assessment is not equitable noting that large areas are not paying enough and home owners are carrying too large a portion of the cost. After noting specific examples of inequitable costs, Mayor Bishop requested that Council hold another hearing to consider alternate methods of assessment such as the area method. (e) City Administrator stated the hearing should be held on May 3, 1982, in order for staff to have time to notify property owners again of the hearing. (f) Councilor Brian agreed with Mr. Bingham`s concerns and discussed some specific examples of comparison of the initial method assessments vs the area method of assessment. He stated the middle traffic signal proposed benefited Pac Trust and felt it should be charged to them. Council also noted he railroad track which serves Predelivery should possibly be charged directly to that company too. (g) After lengthy discussion regarding assessment method options, consensus of Council was to direct staff to notify property owners of four assessment methods to be considered at the next public hearing. Those included: 1. The initial assessment method. 2. The cost spread on an area basis 3. Initial assessment method with signal light at Pac Trust and railroad at Predelivery being charged only to those properties. 4. Area assessment method with middle signal light at Pac Trust and railroad at Predelivery being charged only to those properties. (h) Council requested Legal Counsel opinion on whether the hearing on May 3rd could include more than one assessment. Legal Counsel responded that any method of assessment could be used as long as Council has shown method chosen on rational basis of facts. (i) After some discussion regarding hearing, Councilor Stimler moved to set public hearing for distribution of assessment on 72nd Avenue LID 421 for May 3, 1982, at 7:30 P.M. , with assessments being considered in four ways; A - initial assessment method; B - area assessment method; C - initial assessment method with special assessments of railroad and signal light be- ing charged to individual property owners; & D - area assessment method with special assessments of railroad and signal light being charged to individual property owners. Motion seconded by Councilor Cook. (j) Council discussed the amount of the deductions which should be carried by the City. Consensus of Council was to split the cost of the deductions 50/50 and reduce the $1.5 million by that 50% amount. (Deductions were street lights and sidewalks.) Motion to set public hearing was approved by unanimous vote of Council. PAGE 7 - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 12, 1982 (k) City Administrator suggested that the deferral ordinance be sent to residen- tial property owners and hear that issue also on May 3rd. (1) Councilor Stimler drew Council 's attention to the letters from the Water District which discussed the possibility of a water line construction in 72nd Avenue. She asked what the timing of this project would be and expressed concern that this not be emplaced after the improvement of the Street. Director of Public Works advised Council that he had contacted the Water District about the LID process and would be glad to time the improvement with the District if they would contact him. Council requested staff contact the Water District and encourage them to develop at the time of the LID improvement. 18. SIGN CODE/BUSINESS CODE ENFORCEMENT POLICY DISCUSSION (a) City Administrator presented a listing of areas in the City which present code enforcement problems for staff. He stated staff is beginning a three step process for enforcement as follows: I . Notification of violation. 2. Letter of Warning. 3. Citation Issuance. He requested guidance from Council on how to address some of the areas of the code dealing with temporary and conditional uses and how strict an interpre- tation should be made. Consensus of Council was to discuss this issue further on April 19th after they receive a copy of the proposed sign code section prepared by Building Official. 19. ORDINANCE No. 82-19 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16.24 OF THE TIGARD 14UNICIPAL CODE BY EXTENDING THE DATE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SIGN REGULATIONS. (a) City Administrator recommended that Council approve the extension of com- pliance date for the signs which are in violation of the sign code since 1971 . He suggested that the time line be extended to June 30, 1982. He noted that if Council wished to extend this further after more research into the code, that another ordinance could be passed at that time. (b) Tony McCasline member from the audience, encouraged the Council to appoint a committee to consider the sign code and regulations. (c) Staff requested that citizens be given a copy of the code if they are interest- ed, however, let the Council and staff work through the problems. City Administrator stated that regulation is expensive to enforce and he was seek- ing ways to reduce costs and make the code more flexible. (d) Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Stimler to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. RECESS City Council Meeting - 11: 14 P.M. Council Met as TURA (see TURA minutes) PAGE 8 - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 12, 1982 RECONVENE: 11:24 P.M. 20. OPEN AGENDA: Consideration of Non-Agenda Items identified to the Chair under item 1 .3 will be discussed at this time. All persons are encouraged to contact the City Administrator prior to the meeting. 20.1 Report on K-9 Police Program City Administrator reported that staff was unable, to date, to acquire a dog for the program. Chief of Police will be reporting further on other training programs available at the April 29th Budget Committee meeting. 20.2 APPROVE UNIFORM BID PACKET ON RECONDITIONING OF EXISTING STREETS Council and staff discussed the priority listing of the 1981-82 overlay program as set forth in the bid packets. Council requested the following changes in the list: Item 11 be changed to read "to 112th" not "to 121st". Item 12 be changed to read so that only that property in the city limits >> overlayed. Item 13 be changed to read so that only that property in the city limits is overlayed. Item 14 be changed to read so that only that property in the city limits is overlayed. Motion by Councilor Cook, seconded by Councilor Stimler to adopt the bid packet with corrections on item 11 and all streets not in city be removed from the listing. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 20.3 ANNEXATION PROGRESS REPORT City Administrator mentioned that the North Dakota Island annexation proposal was approved by the Boundary Review Commission, however, the Bechtold annexa- tion was split and, as approved, would not create the "Walnut Island" as originally planned. Mayor Bishop noted he had heard from the Governor's office and that the City would be receiving a letter expressing their concern. 20.4 Councilor Scheckla requested an update on the Library lease. City Administrator stated this lease was at the City Attorney's office being prepared and-could be returned to staff soon for processing. ADJOURNMENT OF OPEN SESSION OF COUNCIL: 11:28 P.M. 21 . EXECUTIVE SESSION: Personnel and Labor Relations per ORS 192.660 (2)(a) , and Real Property transactions per ORS 192.660 (1)(e) . City Administrator stated that Legal Counsel would have to report next week along with staff regarding Real Property transactions per ORS 192.660 (1)(e) . PAGE 9 - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 12, 1982 Under ORS 192.660 (2)(a) , City Administrator reported that testing had been y accomplished for the clerical network positions and presented the results for Council approval. Council advised staff how to proceed. 22. ADJOURNMENT: 12:10 P.M. City Recorder ATTEST: L , Mayor k PAGE 10 — COUNCIL MINUTES — APRIL 12, 1982 Date April 12, 1982 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print your naine) 1 .3 Call to Audience, Staff and Council for Non-Agenda Items Under Open Agenda :Janie, Address & Affiliation Item Description �a ✓ I _ �J o {'t v� sc»I �� 5 5`��, S13u,`7 C Date April 12 1982 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print your name) Item Description: 6. HILLVIEW LID (Final Assessments) proponent (for) Opponent (against) Jame, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation /a3`fU S.u/ /�i c c uif7ti wdI/E2 /16s —A17 v J-4,1 Lcl LC April 12, 1982 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print your name) Item Description: P 7. McDOIJALD SEWER LID Proponent (for) Opponent pp (against) Name, Address and Affiliation , - Nam , Address and Affj..],iatio�n ZiMER Date Mar:!h 12, 1982 I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following item: (Please print your name) Item Description: 8. HOODVIEW SANITARY SEWER LID Proponent (for) Opponent (against) PP (a ainst vame� Address and AffiliationN -- ��/ 'q—" Name, Address and Affiliation ul � /U ------------- PAYMENT OF BILLS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL March 31, 1982 PRnrRAM BUDGET Community Protection Police 29,361.11 o Public Works 4 18100 - Municipal Court 7 ,5,77- 3n—_ Planning jjR47 56 Building 1,52[1 43 Total Community Protection 38,634 .40 Home & Community Quality Public Works 12,345.54 Social Services Library 2,648.58 Aged Services Youth Services Historical Total Social Services 2,648.5$ Policy & Administration Mayor & Council 3 ,22_3147 Administration 9 n9P'_E,3 Finance 2,719 S7 Total Policy & Administration 6 057.67 City Wide Support Functions Non-departmental 24 898.41 Misc. Accounts (refunds & payroll deductions, etc. ) 46.952.76 Investments 200,000.00 CAPITOL BUDGET Community Protections Road Acquisition & Dev. Parks Acquisition & Dev• 138.04 Storm Drainage Total Community Protection 138.04 Support Services Building Improvements DEBT SERVICE General Obligation Bond 3.420.69 Bancroft Bond UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY Contract TOTAL AMOUNT OF CHECKS WRITTEN 335.096.09 2.3 P � - MEMORANDUM TO: City Council / FROM: Finance Director DATE: April 8, 1982 RE: Renewal of Insurance Attached are quotations secured for the renewal of the city's Inland Marine coverages and blanket buildings and equipment (contents) cover- age. With respect to this coverage it is to be noted the value to be insured has increased from $1, 120,670 to $1,811,684 and the low quotations are less than last year. The following recommendation is within the 1981-82 budgeted amount. It is recommended the city accept the following quotations: Company Deductible/Description Premium J.G. Newman Company Commercial Property Coverage $ 2,509. Blanket Bldg. Personal Property - $500 Deductible Chubb PI Commercial Inland Marine 996. Miscellaneous Schedule Equipment Floater Direct physical damage Deductible - 1% of loss ($100 min. -$350 max.) It is suggested Council consider the following options: (1) accept the recommendation of staff. (2) accept J.G. Newman Company quote for property coverage with $1000 deductible and premium of $2,393. (3) accept J.G. Newman Company quote for floater coverage with $100 deductible and premium of $1,074. It is suggested Council move to adopt recommendation #1. t; 4 CITY OF TIGARD ALL PROPERTY OF AN INSURABLE NATURE EMCEPT SCFFEDULED 13QUIPMELTT QUOTATIONS AND INEOFMATIM h 1. boli cy quotations for.blanket coverage based on the a£ statements of values attached hereto. 2. Total limit of 1dability is $1,773,388. at 100% Values. 3. insurable perils are: All risks of direct physical damage excluding earthquake and flood subject to other standard ).::;policy terms and conditions. 4—Deductible-options: $500. Deductible per Occurrence $1,000. Deductible per occurrence 5. Included coverages are as follows: Replacement Cost on all Property Agreed mount Endorsement 6. Valuable Papers Coverage in the amount of $168,000. for maps and other valuable papers stored in a metal filing cabinet. at 12755 SW Ash. 'r Canputer Software at 9020 SW Burnha�il in the amount of $11,000. Deduct 'ale $100. .a•C u" All risks of direct physical damage as defined above. Pranium for 1982 - 1983 ** $2,50. ** For $1,000 Deductible subtract $116. QTY OF TIGARD 12755 S. W. Ash P. O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 i. Leonard Adams Company 11420 S.W. Canyon Road P.O. Box AA s Beaverton,Oregon 97005 r (503)644-1156 4 CITY OF TICARD MM2ANY QUOTATIONS '' 11 COMPANY $500. DED. PRIIALIN! $1,000. DED. PREbffUNi ** C33UBB PI $3,369. $2,995. J. G. NE.STMN $2,509. $2,393. AE'INA $21752. $2,688. NQURYLAND CASUALTY $3,136. $2,817. The value of the 1981 - 1982 annual insurance was $1,120,670. The annual premium for the 1981 - 1982 insurance was $2,709. , ** Current Carrier CITE' OF TIGARD -- SCHEDULED EQUIPMEMIr FIAATER I QUOTATIONS AND INFORMATION 1. Schedule of Equipment per schedule on the policy Limit of Liability $311,283. .Y .. 2• Insurable perils are: All risks of direct physical derma e excluding earthquake and flood subject to other standard policy terns and conditions. 3. Deductible offered: 1% of amount of amount of loss subject to a $100. Minimum and $350. Maximurn 4• Included coverages: Provision for rented, leased or hired equipment.; Automatic acquisition clause for newly acquired equipment. Premium for 1982-1983 $ 996.00 ( Averag TO BE COMPLETED BY COMPANY,AGENT OR.BROY.ER ` [7. Bt 0 Sp D Item Description,location and Occupancy Cover- Rate No. of Property Covered age o Values Pub. No. Rate Adj. 1 CITY HALL (QLD)_ 1930-40 - Bldg 201,591 12420 SW Main. Remodeled in 69 Tigard, Oregon Joisted Masonry - '2 LTBRAI� 1930-40 12566-68 SW Main foisted Masonry Bldg NIL _-- ---.-------- Tigard, Oregon Cant -309,773 3 POLICE STATION 1955 -- -- - - - - 9020 SW Burnham Jointed Masonry Bldg 85,572. Tigard, Oregon Cont 43,281. - +• 4 FENCE 1,239. Located within 25'.. of Police station 5 - GARAt EAUWER SHOP. 1945 Bldg 88,681_ 12880 SW Ash -foisted Masonry - - ----- Tigard, Oregon Cont 20,493. , 6 MAINTENANCE SHOP 1975 Bldg 79,647. 12880 SW Ash Joisted Masonry Tigard, Oregon Cont 20,493_ t 7 SERVICE STATION Redone in 79 Bldg 5,090. 12880 SW Ash Incombustible ' Tigard, Oregon Cont 2,562- 8 CARPENTER SHOP 1955 Bldg 7,558. 12880 SW Ash Fr.-ane Tigard, Oregon Cont 1,535. 9 FAINT & STORAGg SHOP 1955 Bldg 12880 SW Ash Incombustible 3,774. Tigard, Oregon Cont 2,200 10. FENCE Frame 6,106 t COOK PARK PumpHouse SW 92nd -j ldg 10,000 . Tigard, Oregon Cont 2,000 1l RfNT STAND 1970's Bldg 11,270. Frame Cont 776. TOTALS - AVERAGE RATES EFFECTIVE F ' [i=Etuilding S=Stock PPI=Personal Property of the Insured PPO=Personal Property of Others Other— Specify Above CF 16 15 (Ed. 05 77 CAverage TO BE COMPLETED BY COMPANY,AGENT OR BROKER Q Bla O Spe O Item Description,Location and Occupancy Cover- Rate No. of Property Covered age' Values Pub. No. Rate Adj. 12 Cook Park Boat Dock & Ramp.. . Bldg 15,000 Cont 13 FRAME PICNIC SHELTER 1970's Bldg 12,198. _ - Cont - 10,758. 14 FRAME COM SHELTER 1970's Bldg 1,336. Cont 22. 15 FRAME FOOT BRIDGE 1970's 6,148. — - ------ Woodard Park 16 JACK PARK - RESTR00yis 1975 Bldg 20,776. Joisted Maso Cont 341 17 PUBLIC 1,7O10CS ANNEX 1975 Remodeled Bldg 29,998. Conc. Blk Cont 2,200. l8 COOK PARK SOCCER FIELD 1980 Bldg 45,945. RT g Joisted Cont 1,100. 19 SUVP 'R Fpp'I' BRIDGE 1.981 35,000 Frame 20 CITY HALL (NEtiV) 1970 12755 SW Ash Frame & Concret Tigard, Oregon Cont 225,000. 2l SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER 1981 Bldg 455,824. 8815 SW O'Mera Tilt up Concret Tigard, Oregon 22 COOK PARK RESTROOM[ 1970 Bldg 44,397 Joisted Masonr y - �. 2,000 TOTALS AVERAGE RATES EFFECTIVE ____ FI E' B=E;;,ildin:R: S PPI=Personal Property of the Insured PPO=Personal Property of Others Other—Specify Above CF 16 15 (Ed. 05 77) QTY OF TIGARD COMPANY QUOTATIONS COMPANY PRUIVIEUM DEDUCTIBLE ** CHLIBB PT $ 996. _ } 1% of 1OSS - (100 min 350 nax) J. G. 2�EWNN $1,074. $100. .. MARYLAND CASUALTY $1,981. $100. The total values for the 1981 -- 1982 policy teen Ly were $293,956 with a pregtt tun of $1039.00 okik Current Carrier •a. ' i` 1 CiTf OF WARD April 7, 1982 WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON Members of City Council Tigard, Oregon SUBJECT: Appointment to Library Board Honorable Persons: The Selection Committee recommends that Dorene Thomas be appointed to the Tigard Library Board to replace Theresa Zagone whose term expires June 30, 1984. Ms. Zagone has resigned from the Library Board. Yours �truly, Wilbur Bishop Mayor cv 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 UNIFORM BID PACKET FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT TITLE: (Wheelchair) Architectural Barriers Removal & Sidewalk Improvements - 1981/82 City of Tigard 12420 S.W. Main St. Tigard, Oregon 97223 (l EXHIBIT "B" SCHEDULE OF PRICES (Wheelchair) Arch. Barriers Removal & S/W Impr. 1981 - 82 Proposal ITEM UNITS UNIT PRICE SUB. TOTAL 1) Wheelchair Ramp(s) 75 2) Sidewalk 900 }, PROPOSAL GRAND TOTAL: The quantities stated in connection with the price schedule are approximate and payment shall only be made on the unit prices named for the actual quantities incorporated in the completed work. Only those items for which estimated quantities are given may be increased or decreased at the unit prices named. If there shall be an increase in the total payment for an item covered by a lump sum price, it shall be computed on a basis of Extra Work for which an increase in payment will have been earned, and if there be a decrease in a lump sum payment for any such item, it shall be made only as the result of negotiation between the undersigned and the Owner. The City expressly reserves the right to add units to or delete units from any or all items listed above, at any time. Bidder's Signature Date Signed L._t a3 v �•- i -T,• nr -- --I r _ 1 i ou Ir 1 'SAW Vo[ \\ ~ !-•—a 1 777A3'97j.-. i-'- •w-s `� A. A. � Q � Eu u LL r umLS ----- E i N 171; s 1 -3Ar VOL -r"S „ Sty 1 1; 1 Cis Willj « n� M ; CCVV//Gw�H Dom. �P.TWi'w Y t 4 rwta� r•11 \ +� �tl MM91w 'M'SOA1i oll O WEff.J 'p S ' - 17069 A 2 �, �► 4�' r: I1: w's o r r106 \ 0 Y y�V` 9 C� _•3Ar A•'Y { G' S I *V.�V 3 y _ e Q rIGB a v dd` n a�s0 lO Yip N ` � h � t4) `O •'t +yr M31 n1 `f l � o� 'lAr •4 -D' prt�` ` ��`� rS �w Nu ? 7nii - �•lY a © 1 `'paO .J � � 3Ar _ �-';Y51! Qq g m w j•!TN` a ... +� r 9a• 1 ^S, Vi �• J alMirM to MT ` Ar w J _ GOI 1901 `0 1A•t Yid g «g *� ' als. w � 4 (ZI a Q I to Ao ' r• �+ w's CD V �� i I�i G •iir d : J x rs'M 1 I 3• „a` b a°tlr 94 \...'A's M. 4..9 -Ali-: M., � ENT IR JA ]f r••��1� 1911 y _ y ' `!G 3A --Y1111 'w9 • nr rleu 442-s Ar \rlpll \ J r�: 319� t- So r ffli � � i � Yd* + VLII O WYlarlDlY rS AT w ), Ly S !v "w'9 lo Yip t r21- ; 3 r� � � •>SA S '3nr r a r•r:l < � � r All �T.at132rN R As 3JrW131 ` S 1-- yj ,Y •3Ar J 3't6 •{ ..a OIM3aaOt , �M [J a48 C u {.YIGZr'M'S at\H21G.t ►rl IpS 14 (-' j 1 A '�Y •°� UAd)3nr r1C2i 3tlr1 \ '3nr -3Ar WI Y[ xr? i q'si 'M's [� "\ as JJ j T)3a _ I've, Ms - Date Issued OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE APPLICATION OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION P.O. BOX 22297, PORTLAND, OREGON 97222 Application is hereby made for: _ X Special Retail Beer License @ $10.00 per day per stand —.L No. of Stands 2 No. of days. —X "Special Retail Wine License @ $10.00 per day per stand I_ No. of Stands P No. of days. Hours of sale are from 7:00 AM to 2:30 AM.Indicate license(s)desired by placing a check mark in the box(es) above; also indicate the number of stands and number of days you desire to operate. Enclosed is a check or money order in the amount of$--!LO .0 0 as full payment.Fee will be refunded if license is denied,otherwise it will not be refunded. i. Applicant: Tigard Town and Country Days Committee 2. Trade Name: Telephone No. 639-8438 3. Mailing Address: P.O . Box 23881 Tigard 97223 (Number) (street) (City) - (Zip) 4. Ev`&Card Town and Country Days 5. Type of Event: Picnic Convention Fair Civic or community enterprise X Other similar special event* *Specify event 6. Person(s)responsible: T P S-h a ft-r 68 li-n S 6 o (Name) Business telephone) Address: - 3-4944 SW l 41 st Tigard 9722"3 6'19-8438 (Number) (street) (City) (Zip) (}{o,ne}elepho�) 7. Address where license will be used: Cook Park, 92nd Street Tigard, Ore. 97223 Washington (Name) (street) (City) (Zip) (County) 8. Exact location of event: Cook Park, Tigard, Ore . 9. Above location is: X Within City limits Outside City limits (Check one) 10. Date(s)of event: August 7 and 8, 1982 11. Hours of operation: 8/7-1 1AM to 10 PM, 8/8-11 AM to 8 P.M.Expected attendance: 2, 000 12. Who will receive the profits from this license: Tigard T own and Country nays Committee 13. I/we understand that a false answer to any of the foregoing questions will subject this application to denial.Uwe certify that all information submitted is complete and correct to the best of my/our knowledge. Signature: Signature: Date 3/29/82 19 COMPLETED AND ENDORSED APPLICATION MUST BE RECEIVED BY OLCC 10 DAYS PRIOR TO DATE OF EVENT THAT APPLICATION COVERS. Forth 8454`x478(Rov.480) THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ENDORSED BY THE APPROPRIATE PERSONS AS INDICATED BELOW, BEFORE SUBMISSION TO THE OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION. 14. THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE PERSON HAVING CUSTODY OF THE PROPERTY WHERE THE EVENT IS TO BE HELD OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE. This application has been submitted to and meets with our approval. (Authorizedaip-tu ) (Date) 15. THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE CHIEF OF POLICE FOR INCORPORATED CITIES OR THE COUNTY SHERIFF FOR UNINCORPORATED AREAS OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES. This application has been submitted to G��� •"� l u' `� C Ifo ���' `� This office recommends�1 GRANT or REFUSE* *If recommendation is REFUSE,please indicate grounds for refusal (Authorized sign tum) (Date) OFFICE USE ONLY SUMMARY OF EVENT: DESCRIBE ACTIVITY,PAST OPERATION,HOW POLICED: Date received I certify that the above information has been verified by me. (Nattte eod title) (Date) Certificate of Authority to operate issued. (Copy enclosed.) Forwarded recommending staff action. Supplemental report enclosed. RESTRICTIONS: ` D'DONNELL. SULLIVAN RAMIS ATTORNEYS AT LAW MARK P.O'DONNELL BALLON & WRIGHT BUILDING CANDY OFFICE .EDWARD J.SULLIVAN - -- TIMOTHY RAMIS 1727 N.W. HOYT STREET KENNETH M.ELLIOTT PORTLAND. OREGON_-97209 ibf N C,"ANT. SUITE 2027209 701:7 CANDY. OREGON 9 CORINNE C.5HERTON (503) 222.4402 1503E 26(. 9 STEPHEN F.CREW 411 STEVEN L.PFEIFFER PLEA`.E REPLY To THOMAS L.MASON PORTLAND OFFICE March 26, 1982 rI, M.-\,R) ? ,M9� REC._��I_� i.1,;.. AAA - Construction Arbitration Ms. Diane Anderson 811 First Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 Re: Arbitration Regarding D.M. Thompson, Inc./ City of Tigard, Oregon Dear Ms. Anderson: This letter is to thank you for your information regarding arbitration procedure and to confirm that you will be sending me a copy of the "American Arbitration Association Construction Industry Arbitration Rules" . Also that you will put my name as counsel for the City of Tigard on the file and will refer all correspondence regarding this matter to me. And finally, that under Section 7 of the arbitration rules which allows me to file an answering statement within seven days of the notice from the administrator means seven days from the time I receive the initiation packet from your office as opposed to seven days from when I received the demand for arbitration in this case. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, Stephen F. Crew SFC:dn cc: yhtf. Bob Jean Mr. Randolph C. Foster T i G A R D WATER R ®'J li R I c-r 8841 S. W. COMMERCIAL ST. TIGARD.OREGON 97223-6290 PHONE (503) 639-1554 RECEIVED A?R 2 ;9$? April 2 , 1982 Jesse O. Lowman Manager Metzger Water District Re; Water service to S . W. 6501 S . W. Taylors Ferry Road 72nd Avenue, south of Portland, Oregon 97223 Highway #217 Dear Jesse: Your board chairman' s (Mr. Ross) letter of March 30, 1982 in response to a letter dated March 17 , 1982 from Chairman Jon Dueker, Board of Commissioners , Tigard Water District, pertaining to water service to the subject area has been referred to me. As you know, Tigard Water District has been serving this area for Metzger Water District, less the ROLLING HILLS Subdivision, since 1973. (See attached map) . Mr. Ross ' letter fails to address any sense of urgency in accomplishing all water. system improvements prior to the street improvements on S. W. 72nd Avenue (LID) which are scheduled to begin early this summer. I believe the public, and particularly the Tigard City Council, would have every right to hang us to the nearest tree if all underground work is not finished prior to blacktopping the new street. Too much work and expense have gone into the 72nd Avenue LID to accept anything less than a coordinated, expeditious effort in getting required preliminary work accomplished as soon as possible. Mr. Ross mentions the continued need for cooperation and coordination between the two water districts. This should also include communication. There has been no discussion on this matter with Tigard Water District, Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District, or the property owners involved. It is getting late in the day. A cursory remark made six (6) months ago that Metzger Water District may, if funds become available from a bond issue, construct a 1 '-inch parallel main under Highway #217 to serve the 72nd Avenue area would not constitute a conclusion of cooperation or communication. Nor does digging potholes to locate existing mains on S. W_ 72nd Avenue, without our knowledge, indicate good cooperation, coordination, or Nil Jesse O. Lowman April 2, 1982 communications. Other than the above noted instances, there has been no communication from Metzger to suggest that plans are being prepared for Metzger to resume responsibility to the industrial area. I believe it is incumbent upon Metzger Water District to keep Tigard Water District fully informed on developments in this area if changes are contemplated. This is true, not only as a matter of courtesy, but to comply with the provisions of our contract, dated September 21, 1973, in which Tigard agreed to serve this area for Metzger and in which Metzger is required to give Tigard ninety (90) days ' prior written notice of any intention to cancel the agreement. Mr. Ross states that Metzger has adopted a program for resumption of water service by Metzger Water District to this area. As your Board of Commissioners is well aware, water service to the industrial area along S . W. 72nd Avenue has been, in the past, a very controversial subject because Metzger has never been capable of providing adequate fire flows. In 1973, there was a major crisis when Metzger Water District attempted to resume water service to this area. It is still questionable, even with a parallel main across Highway #217, whether fire flows can be increased to an acceptable level. I believe the fire district and the Insurance Services Office would be very much interested in this change of respon- sibility without assurances that acceptable fire flows can be maintained. (See attached letter dated July 16, 1973 from the fire chief) . It would also be appropriate to advise, at an early date, other parties to the 1973 agreement of the contemplated change; namely: Gerber Legendary Blades, Fought and Company, and Expressway Developing Company. They have a vested interest in this matter because they paid for the 12- inch main along S. W. 72nd Avenue. They, along with other affected property owners, may desire to have answers to the following questions about planned changes in water service: a. Will water service improve? b. Will fire flows be increased? C. Will higher quality water become available? d. Will costs for water and fire protection be reduced? e. Will water service be as reliable served from a "dead-end" system versus the present looped system? -2- Jesse O. Lowman April 2, 1982 I submit that the answer -is "no" in each case. I have to wonder who benefits by this change. Certainly not the property owners in that area. They are unanimous in desiring to remain on the Tigard system. For proof of this statement, please refer to the correspondence received as a result of the 1973 "crisis. " They have seen almost a 5-fold increase in their property taxes from Metzger Water District this past year (from 244, to $1.40 per $1,000 assessed valua- tion) with no comparable improvements in services from Metzger. Knowledge of such a contemplated change in water service could be the catalyst for those affected property owners to petition for withdrawal from Metzger Water District and request annexation to Tigard Water District in accordance with O.R.S. 199.490. Tigard Water District has a distinct advantage in serving this area because 72nd Avenue is located just off the route of the district's primary conduit from the city of Lake Oswego where filtered Clackamas River water is imported. Reservoirs are located in relatively close proximity at S. W. Baylor Street, near I-5 freeway. Finally, the area is being served via a looped system which enhances reliability and ensures fresh, circulated water. By geography alone, Metzger will never come close to matching these facilities or fire flows. Mention is made of the major supply transmission main that the city of Tualatin will soon be installing on S. W. 72nd Avenue. I know of no plans for this 36-inch main to serve any portion of 72nd Avenue and, therefore, will be of no benefit to that area. The lower cost of Portland's gravity flow water via this main is mentioned in the letter. Tualatin has mortgaged themselves as well as their children with a bond issue of $8 . 5 million at 11.8% interest to finance this major transmission line. Further, they must pay their pro-rata share of the $26 million to construct the 60-inch main across the city of Portland. To top this off, they must still pay for the water, support the Portland bureaucracy, and pay a growth impact charge for a high growth rate. Cheap water? I submit that the cost of water will be very expensive, indeed. In any event, this issue is not germane to water service to the industrial area. -3- Jesse O. Lowman April 2, 1982 The above comments notwithstanding, Tigard Water District will do its utmost to ensure an orderly transfer of water service to this area to Metzger. If this is to be the final, permanent solution for water service to this area we desire that it be completely served by Metzger and not partially by Tigard Water District. Secondly, that you not rely upon Tigard to bail you out when you are unable to provide adequate service or fire flows. This will be an on-going problem because of the vulnerability of Metzger' s system in attempting to serve a long dead-end pipeline. When Metzger assumes responsibility for the entire area, mains must be installed easterly on S. W. Bonita Road to serve Gevurtz Furniture and Smets Machinery. Also, a main must be installed to serve the Terrace Heights Mobile Court located on Upper Boones Ferry Road. Mr. Ross indicates that water service will be the same, with slight modifications, and with proposed emergency inter- ties to Tigard and Tualatin. Please be advised that all of Tigard' s inter-connecting gate valves will be cut off and capped. Gate valves, inadvertently, get turned on which can play havoc with two independent water systems operating at different pressure levels. Installation of a master meter between the two water districts is the appropriate method of ensuring a back-up water supply. I do not believe your Board of Commissioners is fully aware of . the number of costly improvements Tigard Water Dis- trict has made in this area nor the amount of work involved in disconnecting our system from the existing system on 72nd Avenue. Over the years, Tigard Water District has made signif- icant improvements and has, essentially, integrated the two systems so as to provide the best possible water service. To undo this now entails far more than merely turning a few gate valves. Enclosed is a listing of improvements made by Tigard since the contract was signed in 1973 and for which Tigard is entitled to reimbursement as provided in paragraph 2 of the contract. Total cost of improvements to date is $27,823. 65. The following listed disconnections at the sites noted will be required at an estimated cost of $11,500 : -4- Jesse O. Lowman April 2, 1982 1. 72nd and Hunziker (Hiranport) 2. 72nd and Hunziker 3 . 72nd and Cherry 4 . 72nd and Bonita 5. Ford Predelivery Service on 72nd 6. Convoy on 72nd 7. Oregon Chain Bar on Bonita 8 . Fire sprinkler system to Simmons Mattress on 72nd Four (4) fire hydrants will have to be removed at: 1. Bonita and 72nd 2. . Kable and 72nd 3. North of railroad spur on 72nd 4. South of railroad spur on 72nd Since Metzger will be assuming control of this area, it is deemed appropriate that you also coordinate, monitor, and physically change and/or move all water services, meters, and fire hydrants as will be required by the 72nd Avenue LID and State Highway improvements to the interchange at Highway #217 and 72nd Avenue. Tigard Water District does not intend to once again upgrade a water system for the sole benefit of someone else. It is simply unfair to our patrons. By abandoning the existing 12--inch main on 72nd Avenue, it will be necessary for Tigard Water District to make some improvements prior to the 72nd Avenue street improvements. By copy hereof, the city of Tigard is advised that Tigard Water District will be submitting plans to extend a parallel 16-inch main along S. W. 72nd Avenue, between Bonita Road and Hunziker Street. This is deemed necessary if the Baylor Street reservoirs are .to be used effectively. Construction will com- mence on or about July 1, 1982. -5- t t Jesse O. Lowman April 2, 1982 It is suggested that a meeting be held, at an early date, of interested parties, including representatives from the city of Tigard, Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District, Metzger' s consulting engineer, to discuss the plans for change-over to the Metzger system, proposed new water lines, and time schedule of planned projects. Very truly yours, T�IGARD WATER DISTRICT A Robert E. Santee, P. E. Administrator/Engineer Copy to: Board of Commissioners, Tigard Water District Administrator, City of Tigard Administrator, City of Tualatin Fire Chief, Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission Gerber Legendary Blades Fought and Company Expressway Developing Company Gevurtz Furniture Smets Machinery Terrace Heights Mobile Court -6- I I I Laid ++I L 2 ,i M TZG R ATER j i j\ DI T T f 31 `" E FTT ,h1A R TRI CT - L — Yawwi FE — ROLLING (((�� � 5+. rip r E � .4 o U _ �FiILLS' • w` I Ewwr crnEE i iawoeuw RIP ,r , Williams Ai 12 Control I Gerber it NE.DO. I Blades o s Fought _ TIGB-- Steel tn7ATEt�\ DISTRIC L t - F. ROAD 1 J..,TALAXE, ,OQGO ir. lewira PL INE �6evu Z' - .___ � Fur 1 � 1 -- S --?I I 8�w4 ! I cwvKraLa/ I ar TI .b7A R For ��" f t I. + "� ` U I JD RI -. Pre-delivery ice/ 1 W. Ra6CE iTw[ 1 � \ -- EV SW KRP_E 000 .— - -� o iiwa a a w E f PLACE ' ® �L40 L _ . S, erwood I sEnEt i i L IsYEi!e 1 t T GARD i ' -Inn —' _ -_+ p K - t \ TER — ! TRI } - I ARD J 1 t --� l' 1 ao __ ,•• w•etcnl_ �_ 1[cove Y!` g. REIMBURSABLE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IN METZGER WATER DISTRICT 1. Oct 1973: Inter-connect 16" D. I . with Metzger's 6" and 12" on Bonita Road at 72nd. . . . . . .$1,551.26 2. Aug 1974 : Installed 50 ' of 8" C.I. + 1 fire hydrant near Hiranport, Inc. and connect to Metzger's 6" main on Hunziker. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,861.97 3. Mar 1976: Installed 400 ' of 6" along S. W. Bonita Road, between 74th .and General Chain Bar Co, to complete circulation loop with Metzger. . . . . . . . . . . 4,798.21 4. Mar 1977: Installed fire hydrant at S. W. 72nd and Fought Avenue (near Georgia-Pacific) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 933.35 S. Oct 1978 : Installed 250 ' of 6" D.I. to serve new building at terminus of S. W. Varns Street (near I-5) (Not paid for by developer) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,287.37 6. Mar 1982: Lowered 250 ' of 12" and 6" C.I . mains on S. W. 72nd Avenue, between Sandburg and Tech Center Drive in preparation of 72nd Avenue LID. . . . . . . . . .14,245.94 7. 1973-82: Meter Maintenance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,145. 55 Total: $27,823 . 65 r- .j. THIPIrlIR - I P. O. BOX 286 0 TUALATIN, OREGON 97062 ® PHONE 638-6861 s RUSSELL WASHBURN, CHIEF i July 16, 1973 Hoard of Directors Metzger Water District 6501 S.W. Taylors Ferry Road Portland, Oregon 97223 Gentlemen: Final results of tests for water flows from the hydrants on 72nd between Hunziker and Gerber Blades were received today. These results show that a very serious condition exists. The previous fire flows were 1475 gpm from each hydrant with a total capacity of 4300 gpm. Today's report shows that 1150 gpm from each hydrant with a total capacity of 1300 gpm, a decrease of 3000 gallons per minute. The enclosed fire flow chart shows the gallons per minute required for each of the following buildings: Circle AW Products Co. 60,000 sq. ft. 3500 gpm Georgia Pacific Bldgs. 39,000 sq. ft. 2750 gpm Gerber Legendary Blades 50,000 sq. ft. 3250 gpm Williams Air Controls 161,000 sq. ft. 5500 gpm Dickinson Co. 40,000 sq. ft. 3000 gpm Fought Steel 180,000 sq, ft. 6000 gpm Ted Nelson Co. 30,000 sq. ft. 2500 gpm This means that unless fire is discovered in the early stages in these buildings, we will be unable to prevent their total destruction. Information received from the Insurance Services Office toda}• shows they are aware of the situation and that under the present fire district grading, the insurance rates wil? go from Class 6 to Class 7B in most cases. They also pointed out that under our new grading, the rates may have decreased. This could mean an annual insurance premium increase of several thousand dollars for all the industrial plants in that area, is there any pussii,ility of putting this water line back on the Tigard Water District system until slich time that you have adequate fl,7ws available from your own system? Y-:.ur inunediato attention to this mattes- wi•nlc4 i•(- appr-c•:-t-. ,;, tisr -t--rill, I , , lih°:•tu. � i• t -2- cc: Tigard Water District Circle AW Products Co. Ted Nelson Co. Dickinson Co. General Chain Bar Co. Hyster Sales Co. Fred S. James Co. Pre-delivery Service Corp. Williams Air Controls Expressway Development Co. Fought & Co., Inc. Oregon Toro. W. C. Sievers Construction Burroughs Corp. Metropolitan Boundary Commission Gerber Legendary Blades 1N5LIRAN('E tif•at�'It:F`: ��1�1'1('1•: ,i--J o o �(wJ)�o O FIRE FLOW VS GROUND AREA F=18C(A)0.5 Non-combustible Construction F=gpm; C=0.8 . (ground area in square feet) A=area in sq. ft. _ fpm 1 2 3 4 5 6 Stories 500 I 1,900 1,000 600 500 400 300 750 3,700 1,900 1,200 900 700 600 1000 6,100 3,100 2,000---1,500 1,200 1,000 1250 n n 9,100 4,600 3,000 2,300 1,800 1,500 U 1500 12,700 6,400 4,200-3,200-2,500-2,100 1750 17,000 8,500---5,700 4,100 3,400 2,800 00 2000 21,800 10,900 7,300 5,500 4,400 3,600 2250 27,200 13,600 9, 100 6,800 5,400 4,500 2500 n - 33,200 16,600 11,100 8,300 6,600 5,500 �Vf 2750 39,700- 19,900 13,200 9,900 7,900 6,600 3000 47,100 23,600 15,700- 11,800 9,400 7,900 0 3250 ' 54,900 27,500 18,300 13,700 11,000- 9,200 3500 63,400-31,700-21,100 15,900-12,700 10,600 3750 --- 72,400-36,200-24,100 18,100-14,500-12, 100 0n � 4000 ((�J)) 82,100-41,200-27,400-20,500-16,400-13,700 0 4250 92,400-46,200-30,800-23,100-18,500-15,400 O 4500 O 103,100 51,600 34,400 25,800 20,600 17,200 4750 114,600------57,300--38,200-28,700-22,900 19,100 5000 -126,700-63,400-42,200-31,700-25,300-21, 100 5250 139,400 69,700 46,500----34,900- 27,900 23,200 5500 152,600 76,300 50,900 38,200 30,500------25,400 5750 --166,500-83,300-55,500-41,600-33,300-27,800 \ 6000 -12- T i G A�yI� 1t,® WATER T E R D I CT R'CT 8841 S. W. COMMERCIAL ST. �// ✓ TIGARD.OREGON 97223-6290 PHONE (503) 639-1554 April 5, 1982 R�C�ili D APR 5 1982 Roy Rogers Mayor, City of Tualatin 12900 S. W. Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Roy: I think you should be aware that the city council of Tualatin, knowingly or unknowingly, has entered the fray regarding water service to the industrial area along S. W. 72nd Avenue, near Bonita Road. Last Friday, I left at your office a copy of my letter dated April 2, 1982 to Jesse Lowman, Manager, Metzger Water District, which described, in detail, my views on Metzger Water District re-establishing water service to this area. Many of. the "behind the scenes" plans and decisions between Tualatin and Metzger Water District are now coming to light. Finally, at the 11th hour, Metzger is making known its plans to Tigard Water District. For example: it was unknown to me that the city of Tualatin intends to provide a back-up supply of water to Metzger via a master meter to be located at S. W. 72nd and Kable Street. Water service to the 72nd Avenue industrial area has been a very controversial subject since 1966 between Tigard, Metzger, and the property owners located therein. Enclosed are copies of a few of the letters from some of the property owners in that area. In summary, the area should never have been annexed to Metzger Water District. It forms an illogical boundary with Metzger attempting to serve a "long finger" south all the way to Upper Boones Ferry Road. Metzger Water District belongs in Garden Home, Progress, and Metzger, not the greater Tigard area. This is similar to Tualatin' s city park which is loca- ted within the incorporated limits of the city of Durham. How ridiculous! Mayor Roy Rogers April 5, 1982 The plan to serve the 72nd Avenue area, as revealed to me this date by letter from CH2M, after we had made specific inquiry, includes the use of Tualatin ' s 36-inch main to pro- vide back-up water, presumably when the pressure drops in Metzger's system. This will occur whenever a fire hydrant is opened or an emergency occurs in Metzger's system. It still does not resolve the problem of a "looped" system with fresh, circulated water. I appreciate the fact that you have a joint venture going with Metzger on importing Bull Run water. However, I am not sure your council is aware that the plan calls for Tualatin to provide back-up water in the controversial�72nd Avenue area. I believe the property owners along S. W. 72nd Avenue Will soon be petitioning to withdraw from Metzger Water Dis- trict and request annexation to Tigard Water District. Tualatin could become involved (and in the middle) of this controversy. Maybe you want to be in this battle; maybe you do not. I do not believe this was the intent of the city council when agreeing to connect to the Bull Run system with Metzger as an inter-link. This maneuver by Metzger 'dater District circumvents the desires of the property owners and necessitates an immediate capital expenditure of over $100, 000 to construct a parallel main on 72nd Avenue. (by Tigard Water District) . If this is the council 's desire, so be it. However, I want to be sure it is the council and not the staff that is making this decision. you. In any event, I wanted to share my views with you. Thank Sincerely yours, TIGARD WATER DISTRICT Robert E. ntee Administrator r 14200 SOUTHWEST 72nd AVE. PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 / PHONE : 503 639-6161 GERBERJ'egendar9BLADES July 13, 1973 JOSEPH R. GERBER, JR. President The Governing Board The Governing Board Metzger Water District Tigard Water District 6501 S.W. Taylors Ferry Rd. 8841 S.W. Commercial St. Portland, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Gentlemen: As your records and files will disclose, an agreement was recorded between the Metzger Water District and Gerber Legendary Blades; Fought and Co., Inc.; and, Expressway Developing Co. on November 14, 1966, under the terms of which the Metzger Water District did in fact construct at the expense of the private corporations a 12-inch water main connected to the lines of the Tigard Water District at Hunziker Street and extending southerly along Hunziker and S.W. 72nd Avenue to a point near the premises of Gerber Legendary Blades for purposes of providing adequate water and pressure for fire protection. This agreement was followed by another document naming Tigard Water District, Metzger Water District, Fought and Co. , Gerber Legendary Blades, Expressway Developing Co. , Oregon Toro and Hyster as parties. The undersigned was advised that some time in the month of May, 1973, the fire protection to be afforded by this line was in major part compromised by the disconnection thereof from the Tigard Water District or by the closing of a valve which otherwise would have maintained sufficient pressure to provide the level of protection contemplated by the parties in the agree- ments. This was undertaken without any notice to any of the private parties and it is our understanding that this situation continues, thus creating a grave question of whether any effective fire-fighting water source would be available in the event of an emergency. Page Two July 13, 1913 As might be foreseen, a further factor has arisen in that the Oregon Insurance Rating Bureau has brought this situation to light and has indicated that a re-study of fire rates in the area otherwise serviced by the original line is underway and a probable increase in fire insurance costs will result from the insufficiency and incapability of present water sources. The purpose in bringing this matter to the attention of the joint boards is to provide a stimulus to immediately work out some acceptable plan whereby the necessary water supply and pressure would be assured in the event an emergency arises. There appears to be some question of prerogative as between the two Districts and we do not believe that such is justification for the undue risk that has resulted from the impetuous and ill- advised action and inaction which we understand pervades the attitudes of the two boards in their respective operating spheres. Your immediate attention to this matter would be appre- ciated with a prompt response as to what the contributing private corporations may expect by way of remedial action, as it is our position that in the event of a catastrophe we would necessarily expect to hold the Districts liable for damages attributable to their respective roles in the matter. There is the further factor of the threatened increase in fire insurance rates which would be the direct result of the failure of the Districts to recognize their responsibilities in these circumstances. Sincerely, IVe 7sident eph R. Gerber, Jr. re cc: Circle A-W Products Williams Air Controls Ted Nelson Company Expressway Developing Co. Dickinson Co. Fought & Co. Inc. General Chain Bar Co. Oregon Toro Hyster Sales Co. W.C. Sivers Construction Fred S. James Co. Chief, Tualatin Fire District Pre-Delivery Service Corp. Burroughs Corporation Y. CLACKAMAS COLUMBIA MULTNOMAH WASHINGTON o t e � s' -� ►,�; s � �,,�,�<,I �, , ►ter 6400 S.W. CANYON COURT PORTLAND. OREGON 97221 PHONE: 297-2237 August 17 , 1973 The Governing Board and The Governing Board Tigard Water District Tigard Water District 8841 S. W. Commercial St . 8841 S. If. Commercial St. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Gentlemen: This letter is in regard to the water supply situation in the S. W. 72nd Ave . industrial and commercial area. This office from time to time has received inquiries and copies of correspondence regarding the problems of providing an adequate quantity of water service to the area. We have stayed out of the issue because of our belief that the Districts working together could come up with solutions to solve the problem. We have been approached recently by a representative of Gerber Blades, asking us to assist them and other property owners in the area to get the problem resolved. This direct request along with recent copies of correspondence indicating that the situation is deteriorating, make it necessary for us to comment. As we see the situation, there needs to be an immediate solution and a long-range solution. It appears to us that at present the best way to assure an adequate quantity and quality of water service to the subject area is through service provided by the Tigard Water District as out- lined in that District ' s letter of Aug. 10, 1973 . This plan could be implemented quite easily through the approval of an intergovernmental agreement adopted by both Boards . In regard to the long-range solution, this office will shortly begin a study on the feasibility of withdrawing the service area from the Metzger District and annexing it to the Tigard District , or unifying both Districts into a single entity. It is our sincere hope that the immediate problem can be resolved quick- ly. We still believe that people of good faith and reason can work to- gether and provide equitable solutions to problems that occur in this day and age. If you have any questions or we can be of further assis- tance, please feel free to call . cc : Jerry Tippens , BC Chairman Sinc 4Car Pete Gerber, Gerber Blades ' George Birnie, Attorney Donal n, Exec . Officer Elden Carter, Engineer Russ Washburn, Tualatin RFPD Bruce Clark City of Ti and STAFF: COMMISSIONERS: ANTHONY N. FEDERICI DONALD E. CARLSON, Executive Officer JERRY TIPPENS. Chairman H. JOSEPH FERGUSON KENNETH S. MARTIN, Administrat;ve Analyst MRS. BROOKS GUNSUL, Vice Charman MRS. CAROLYN GASSAWAY JEAN KRETZER. Secretary DONOVAN E. BLAIR LOUIS C. LAVACHEK RICHARD M. BROWN CAMPBELL RICHARDSON DR. RONALD C. CEASE DR. PAUL J. SLOMINSK! Williams Air Controls 14100 S.W. 72nd Avenue Portland, Oregon 97223 Phone (503) 639-3151 Division of 4M The Weatherhead Company August 23, 1973 The Governing Board The Governing Board Metzger Water District Tigard Water District 6501 S.W. Taylors Ferry Road 8841 S.W. Commercial Street Portland, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Gentlemen: On behalf of the Williams Air Controls Division of The Weatherhead Company, Expressway Developing Company (our landlord), and the interested parties listed below, I would like to add my plea to you to resolve the fire protection water supply problem with haste. Lacking sufficient water pressure, our facilities can be des- troyed very quickly should a fire start. Facilities can be replaced and business eventually regained, but more importantly, the lives and safety of so many people depend upon the action that you take. As a matter of courtesy to us, and as an expression of your collective concerns as responsible citizens, you should address yourself to communicating the Water Districts' plans for correction of this very serious situation. Sincerely, Edward B. Ray General Manager Reference: Letter to you dated July 15, 1973, from Joseph R. Gerber, Jr. , President, Gerber Legendary Blades Letter to you dated July 16, 1973, from Russ Washburn, Chief, Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District Letter to you dated August 1, 1973, from Arden P. Manning, Controller, Gerber Legendary Blades cc: Circle A-W Products Gerber Legendary Blades Ted Nelson Company Expressway Developing Company Dickinson Company Fought & Company, Inc. General Chain Bar Company Oregon Toro Hyster Sales Company W. C. Sivers Construction Fred S. James Company Chief, Tualatin Fire District Pre-Delivery Service Corp. Burroughs Corporation Mr. Don Carlson Mr. Fred Anderson Robert L. Beck, Secretary & General Counsel, The Weatherhead Company J. R. Hilsinger, Controller, Williams Air Controls X200 SOUTHWEST 72nd ".VE. � PORTLAND, OREGON 97223 P '+ ONE : 503 639 - 6161 GERBER"tegendary BLADES - JOSEPH R. GERBER, JR. August1 , l 9 7:i President _ Mr. Jesse O. Lowman - District Manager Metzger Water District 6501 S. W. Taylors Ferry Iload Portland, Oregon 97223 E Dear Mr. Lowman: I am sure I'm speaking for all of cur nc.ighhors When I say that we have "had it.". Wer huve put IT with Orle delay after another and the fact still 1•em:.1i1-I5 th;lt. not 0nl�� do we not have the same amount of water for fir•c pr•otcrLion we formerly enjoyed, we never will g(,t it froth M(!tzgcr XVaLer ` District. I fecal that you people• shoikl be coiwel-Ile(I tvil.lr seeing that we have tlrc I�r�1 pc�ssiblct scnrrc c c>1' tvatc•r . It seems obvious that cite boot Sourc(. oi• waLri• is to have Tigard tiVator 1)istr ir.i. sc•r•ve us as an ctrl.-crf-district customer and open up i:he 12-inch line at S. W. 72nd and Hunziker ancI loc>l� it t:r:tl' !.!:cit I!i-i:zclr lirlc AL1. :; ' 72nd fionita. Won't you people please do :vhril. is 11eces5a1_y io cause this to happen imr7rediatce1y, Vvcrl if it. 111(lans callinr a special meeting of yot11• l:3oal•d, so we will once aglin have adequate fire protection? Sin*ceruly, no e . Oseph II. Gerber, it.. Attachment Auglzst 31, 1973 Page L cc: Circle A-W l'roclucl.s I:al�r es:,w:ry 1)� v�lupinlr Company Ted Nelson Company ; Dickinson Coinparry oul;l�t. K Company, Inc. _ Or•egori Toro (General Chain Rar.Company W, C. Sivers Construction I Y-Fuer Sales Company an red S. James Com Chief, 'l'ualat:iri 1� Fir'e _District Company Burrouglis Corporation Pre-Delivery Service Corp. Mr. r,•red Anclerson . Mr. Don Carlson Tigard Water llistrict Board of Directors- - Metzger Water 1liytrict Mr. Gus Anderson, C hairm arr Mr. Robert A. S. P inch, Secretary Mr. John 11. Norton, Treasurer Mr. Lawrence: J. L'lum Mr. Dudley 11. Scott UNIFORM BID PACKET FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT TITLE: RECONDITIONING OF EXISTING STREETS FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 1981-82 CITY OF TIGARD 12755 SW Ash Avenge Tigard, Oregon 97223 RECONDITIONING OF EXISTING STREETS (1981-82 OVERLAY PROGRAM) BOM NOTE AV. AV. AV. Wom MEOW-R( ITY STREET EXHIBIT THICKNESS, LENGTH, WIDTH, FROM TO "F" INCHES FEET FEET 1 McDonald JN 2 2635 28 100th St. Hall Blvd. IBM 2 Tiedeman (S) E,F,J,N 2 2415 28 Walnut St. Tigard St. 3 Tigard K,L 2 300 38.5 End of 181 Tiedeman Ave. Overlay 4 N. Dakota H 2 345 22 RR Tracks Tiedeman Ave. 5 Greenburg H,J,N 2 2715 33 95th St. Cascade Blvd. 6 Cascade F,H 2 1150 33 Greenburg "Power Rents" 7 Frewing O,N 2 350 16 Omara St. 350' North 8 Tiedeman (N) J 2 '820 30 Tigard St. Greenburg Rd. 9 97th # A,F,J 2 2300 25 McDonald Murdock + 300' W. 10 98th C,F,J 2 2040 26 Murdock Summerfield Dr. /- Gaarde B,F,J,N 2 1300 26 Pacific Hwy. a-21stj)- // 12 116th A 1 775 30 Walnut SW Lynn 13 Lynn B 11 960 32 121st 116th 14 Ann A 11 900 28 121st 116th 15 118th B 11 636 32 Lynn Katherine 16 119th B 1 626 32 Lynn Katherine 17 Bonita N,Q 12 160 26 At RR Crossing ------- 18 Walnut (City) P 1 1330 24 Grant(c<-/- 100' E. of 106th 19 Hunziker R 2 . 100 36 At RR Crossing ------- 20r 121st St. M 3 2122 1 8 Walnut Sta 39+84 Bike Path *NOTE: Includes Murdock Street from 97th to 98th Avenue The City expressly reserves the right to add to, delete from, or change the order of this .listing at any time. x zT za sw. � cORALb(_ s•�+s SCALE in feet(hundreds) _ v4 t J sw i LOCUT __ pEww+ \ cm t J B 0_ 8 15 24 II w sr. j1 \ I r0 � i u YAPLEIE AF fT ST � 1 � - L E S��'rAPIEIEAF SW, Sw- E5 ST [O110x � �`• KI-� s YA S MITA Gxx ' Fvai \ LONO TAFF !• /, TIIO#M-ST. S •s 'Ni~ m •i (PVSTEVE Np1TN KOTA ri '3° fW. ST SW NORi DAKO Si. m .��... 217 6urrER- A, al• 3, ii baa` � .+� g+•f� PFAFFIC ST. * a r[RCREST MVE �0 S.W. 71BAS0 ST p 1G 1. J S S.W_ i s LCw15 rxxcS[I p- w S W L n P 1 sm. SW IIJIOE yi^ S.W. YFJOOW OYVAII ST. NII ♦ ST « .E r. n d - -- . f: 7 D. 3! ES rATE T/BARn fR rM4` a�ri•. �/f� .. _ 'SJL ANAL rIaLMIrT S7.N �cT. r •� Ski_.��._.!�': -� ij � sa x' �� ! oy'9 � sy. � rT rG. p. am L st / �• 4Gr �,ag- R!?��%�� � rt �� � �� I- y L N h s r \ CAR— ST. SIB. 99 LBERTA ST. £wATKIRS SW FON" R i ~ °�• ST. ST. -3W JArEs R6 B ER z 0 ! O —'jbVrJ YA �' C{ AN ep S. PAR' ST �,�u •! /'� / S.W. •VAR"r ST. � ♦ � u '13 i. ga �y ST. ` _ ST. •E G �F 011�iI. S.w. O%L%RA S.W a / W.RRrR c ♦ a CT, FgM"MEN Wa / ♦� fm. g~ S.W EOBEWOOD ST. w / CHER ! r ; f W. ! i -} [Wr7 N O m MRL- ST. Js ! 1 g�S avVwpw / PYIK PL- a 4` rl�-3 d ,J O iw. S ys Q ,+. NICw1[w,CT. /-.- h 11 `Tr •r Ye DONALD ST E 2 x M ' jI1 > •'I so e o �- ELROSE tl1Y �\'% CNEEE CT. ! \ S LT 7; rN PMrr 3 CT 8 O O - 3 S.w P S FANNO Wc - > • _ 1[OU"TARMEm LANE > 1(DR w ae.iR ffi VIEW TE ACE 5W. KROES LP l R �� C Atvil S.M. IN[Z E ST.rC[ 1 T s • r.+w - . • S.W. S.W T u s. ST V pi i III PI E SC DFL CT . R I SW. ! LYO"T[ ; e 4 NEIL" "• I 1 EMERALD NTS. 1 pR. DARCT Y Cx 1 I ,I( S.W. "OODVKw 3 S.m. 'r SATTL ER Sw. 11 T ROSS ST I / Rt-f Sm. +•' / r Of- SIR aRa[P•ur TLK �wtk DaiVE ♦ x._�.— I i \ -K DOReu[N PL. ` ,r! ER ra w.naRur sr. _t 1 ��-. Awa. e �1.�_ �` ♦4 (; 1 6♦ !I y Qt S //n •r ( r• 1 p S "t`-N I -XI-111 7 E IN JAVES �� March 25, 1982 MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Jean, City Administrator FROM: Celeste Vaughters, Executive Secretary RE: Names Submitted for City Newsletter The following suggestions have been received in response to our request to citizens to submit names for the City newsletter: 1. Tigard News 14. Tigard Tidings 2. Tigard Bulletin 15. Tigard Tidbits 3. The Mirror 16. Tigard's Paws 4. The Forum 17. Regard - News of Tigard 5. The Tiger's Tale 18. Tigard Timely Tidings 6. City of Tigard Necessary News 19. Tigard's Roar 7. The Guardian 20. The City Limits 8. Tigard Guardian 21. All About Town 9. Tigard Town and Country 22. Tigazette 10. The Town Crier 23. The Tigard Newsletter 11. Tigard Town Talk 12. Town Talk 13. The Tigard Way Attached are copies of graphic designs submitted by two persons. Some comments received include: ". . .and find it most interesting. It should be continued." "I think it is a very good idea to keep the people informed. Thank you for my newsletter." "I found the newsletter very informative. . . . .I look forward to receiving the next issue of the newsletter." These suggested names were reviewed by Department Heads, and the name favored by the group was "All About Town" to be used with the graphic design submitted with it. ��} ®#( . . � � ^ + ...k � � , w zed w * 2 �\ Ix ' \ :> � '\ � . .� ct � . . � � . � � . � � I ! < x-' !e ? y: - � � '•illi! ' Rib r .,•��9 tltll`lyl. - r r s to MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Building/Planning Departments RE: Code Enforcement Attached is a listing of areas of the Tigard Municipal Code which present enforce- ment problems for the City. The sign code (Title 16) and the zoning code (Title 18) present most of the enforcement problems. Please note that the applicable code section is quoted and examples of potential violations are listed. The enforcement action taken by the City is noted in each case. We would like the Council to review each example and make a determination as to the enforcement measures should take in each case. SIGN CODE - TITLE 16 Signs - Permit Requirements (Structural, Size , Design) 16.12.010 Required: Except as provided in this chapter, it is unlawful for any person to contruct, structurally alter, or relocate within the City any sign without first obtaining a sign permit from the Planning Director and making payment of the fee required. In addition, all illuminated signs shall be subject to the provisions of the State Electrical Code and the permit fees required thereunder. A-Boy - No permit applied for to reconstruct sign. In violation of permit application requirement. Building Official placed stop work order on reconstruction - construction continued. Schoolhouse Antiques - Signs erected without sign permit approval. No application has been filed. Are in violation of code in that too many signs have been erected on the building. Applicant has been notified of violation. 16.36.040:(8) Except for time and temperature signs and theater marquees and signs used by auto service stations in order to display the current price of gasoline , no freestanding sign permitted pursuant to this section shall include a sign of the type known as a reader board. For the purposes of this section, a "reader board" is defined as a sign designed to permit the changing of the message of the sign regularly or frequently as , for example , a sign made up of a blackboard, changeable paperfaced letters, or a rack designed to hold moveable letters. Davidson's Reader Board - permit was approved in violation of the sign code - reader boards are not allowed. 18.08.560 Vision clearance area: "Vision clearance area" means a triangular area on a lot at the intersection of two streets or a street and a railroad, two sides of which are lot lines measured from the corner intersection of the lot lines for a distance specified in these regulations. The third side of the triangle is a line across the corner of the lot joining the ends of the other two sides. Where the lot lines at intersections have rounded corners , the lot lines will be extended in a straight line to a point of intersection. The vision clearance area contains no planting, walls, structures or temporary or permanent obstructions exceeding three feet in height, except occasional tree trunks or poles. The vision clearance area shall be measured from the top of the curb or , if there is no curb, from the centerline street grade and extend upward ten feet. 16.40.060 (b) Signs at Intersections: No sign shall be erected at intersection of any streets in such a manner as to substantially obstruct free and clear vision nor shall any sign be erected at any location where, by reason of the position, shape or color, it may interfere with, obstruct the view of, or be confused with, any authorized traffic signal or device; nor shall any sign be erected which makes use of the word "stop", "look", "danger", or any other similar word, phrase , symbol or character in such manner as is reasonably likely to interfere with, mislead or confuse motorists. Parkwood Court Apartments "for rent" sign - erected in violation of the Sign Code. The sign has been removed. 16.40.060 Flashing signs and sign illumination. (a) : No exposed reflective-type bulbs, strobe lights, rotary beacons , par spots, zip lights or similar devices shall be permitted. No exposed incadescent lamp which exceeds twenty-five watts shall be used on the exterior surface of any sign so as to expose the face of such bulb or lamp to any public street or public right-of-way. Chalet Pancake sign - In violation of Sign Code design requirements. The sign is non-conforming. SIGN CODE - TITLL 16 (CONTINUED) - Page 2 16.36.040 (b) Height: No freestanding sign located at the right-of-way edge shall exceed twenty feet. Height may increase one foot for each ten feet of setback from the property line (of fifteen feet from pavement edge , whichever is less) to a maximum of twenty-two feet. Casa Pinata - May be in violation of the height limitation. 16.36.040 (6) : If the design reviewer determines that the sign's visual appeal and overall design quality would be served, an additional fifty percent of the allowable sign area and twenty-five percent of sign height (to include the pole cover) may be permitted. No copy will be permitted, however, in the additional area or height permitted. For purposes of this subsection, the word "copy" includes symbols, logos, and figures , as well as letters. 16.4'0.010 Flags, Banners, Political Signs: (a) Prohibited Display of Flags and Banners. It is unlawful to erect or maintain strings of pennants, banners or streamers, festoons of lights, clusters of flags , strings of twirlers or propellers, flashing or blinking lights, flares , balloons , and similar devices of carnival charactC:-. Flags and banners not prohibited are: (1) National, state, and institutional flags properly displayed; (2) Christmas aecorations in season; and (3) Streamers, banners, etc. , used for one week only to call attention to grand opening of a completely new business. - Banners have been noted in the following locations: Wendy's "Open For Breakfast" McDonalds Coco's "Salad Bar" Super Fun "Grand Opening - Pac Man" McCaselines Texaco "We accept Arco Cards" (Walnut & Pacific) - A Frame Signs Mini Flea Market Antique Mobil Gas Station Feeks and Stongs Potato Pub Real Estate Signs advertising open house "Truck" Signs Town Tavern - has had an A frame sign on the top of a pickup parked directly in front of the building. Property owner has been notified that this type of sign is prohibited. Heat Factory - "Going Out Of Business" sign leaned up against pickup parked in property parking lot. No action taken. t i ZONING CODE - TITLE 18 - Page 3 Temporary Use Applications: 18.80.030 Required conditions. Applicants for temporary use permits shall submit such evidence as may be required to enable the Planning Commission or the City Administrator to make a finding that one or more of the following conditions exists: (1) That the need for the temporary use or occupancy permit is the direct result of a casualty loss, such as fire, windstorm, flood or other severe damage by the elements to a preexisting structure or facilitiy previously occupied by the applicant on the premises for which the permit is sought; (2) That the applicant has been evicted within sixty days of the date of his application from a preexisting occupancy of the premises for which the permit is sought as a result of condemnation proceedings by a public authority, or eviction by abatement of nuisance proceedings, or by determination of a public body or court having jurisdiction that the continued occupancy of the facilities previously occupied constitutes a nuisance or is unsafe for continued use ; (3) Loss of leasehold occupancy rights by the applicant due to unforeseeable circumstances or other hardship beyond the foresight and control of the applicant; (4) That the temporary occupancy required is limited in duration by the purposes for which the permit is sought, such as parade stands , circus , fairs , or other exhibitions, sales of goods, wares, merchandise , produce , or Christmas trees, and other similar obviously temporary needs; and that there exists adequate ingress and egress when combined with permanent use of property; there exists adequate parking for customers of temporary vendors; the use will not result in congestion on adjacent streets; and the use poses no hazard or inconvenience to pedestrians or vehicles in the area of the use; (5) That the purpose for which the temporary use or occupancy permit is sought is compatible with and incident to the completion of the basic purpose for which the land is being developed, and the duration of such use is limited by the period of development, such as temporary sales office in a residential district. Settlemier - applied for a temporary use to sell flowers on the corner of Hall Blvd. and Pacific Highway while waiting for conditional use approvals to move into a permanent location. The temporary use permit was valid from February 11, 1982 to April 11, 1982. The conditional use for the permanent location has been approved. Ginger's Plants - An application for a Temporary Use permit has been received by the City for operation of a bedding plant stand on Pacific Highway in the Schoolhouse Reproductions parking lot. Under the temporary use ordinance, staff would approve the permit to allow operation of the plant stand from April S, to May 30, 1982. Approval of this permit will be contingent on staff's site analysis. Christmas Tree Sales - Last Christmas. there were several organizations selling Christmas trees. Only one boy scout troop applied for a temporary use permit. There is no provision in the Code to waive the fee for a temporary use permit for non-profit organizations. Rotary Club Roses at Safeway - The Tigard Rotary Club applied for a temporary use permit to sell roses in the Safeway parking lot for one day. Tne City charged the temporary use fee which was refunded when the Rotary decided not to use the parking lot. Outside Sales: 18.28.020 Conditional Uses: In the C-3 zone the following uses and their accessory uses may be permitted as conditional uses when in accordance with Chapters 18.72 and 18.84: (37) Any business, service , processing, storage or display essential or incidental to any permitted use in the C-3 zone and not conducted entirely within an enclosed building. ZONING CODE - TITLE 18 (CONTINUED)- Page 4 It has been brought to staff's attention that there are locations in town where goods are displayed and offered for sale outside as an accessory use to an existing business. These locations do not have, on a permanent basis, conditional use permits. Fred Meyer - Sale of plants outdoors Safeway - Sale of yard and garden supplies & pumpkins at Halloween Payless - Primarily bedding plants Albertsons - Sale of yard and garden supplies and pumpkins at Halloween. Newspaper Boxes - Sale of Newspapers from a coin operated box. Staff has taken no action on the above. C17YOFTIIFARD April 7, 1982 WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON Members of City Council/Tigard Urban Renewal Agency Tigard, Oregon SUBJECT: Recommended Appointments to Tigard Urban Renewal Agency (TURA) Advisory Committee Honorable Persons: The Selection Committee met on April 6, 1982 to interview citizens interested in serving as members of the Tigard Urban Renewal Agency (TURA) Adv_sory Com- mittee. The Selection Committee recomends that the following persons be appointed to the TURA Advisory Committee in accordance with guidelines specified in the Down- town Revitalization Plan: • Three Citizens-at-Large: Ima Scott, Lou Krupnick, and Joy Hirl • Planning Commission: Craig Helmer • NPO #1: Ralph Appleman • Five Chamber of Commerce Representatives: Allan Paterson, Pat Furrer, Bill McMonagle, JoAnn Corliss, and Cheryl Kuhn • Tigard Park and Recreation Board: Phil Hurl • Water District: James Henderson • Fire District: Eldon Johnson • School District: Pete Taylor • Tigard Library Board: Vince Matarrese The Selection Committee further recommends that Pat Furrer be named as Chairman of the TURA Advisory Committee. Yours truly, lam/ 8 Wilbur Bishop Mayor 12755 S.W.ASH P.O.BOX 23397 TIGARD,OREGON 97223 PH:639-4171 CITY OF T117A 1D March 25, 1982 WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON Mr. Deb Fennell, Superintendent Tigard School District, #231 13137 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: American Government Program and Texts Dear Deb: I would like to compliment the District on its CE2 program and to offer my continued support in that effort. Particularly, I would welcome the chance to work with your staff in developing and improving the program materials. Two texts should be brought to your attention: one good; one not so good. I can highly recommend the materials on local government in Magruder's American Government, William A. McClenaghan, Allyn and Bacon, 1981. Another text which is apparently being recommended in educational circles, which I find inaccurate and do not recommend, is American Government, Armin Rosencranz, Holt, Rinehart & Winston. As always, please feel free to contact me if I may be of any further assistance. Yours truly, U Robert W. Jean City Administrator RWJ:lw CC: Mayor and City Council Irene Ertell, Librarian P.O. BOX 23397 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PH: 639-4171