Loading...
City Council Packet - 10/14/1981 r � TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC NOTICE: This special meeting is SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA for information only. No final action OCTOBER 1.4 , 1981, 7:30 P.M. will be taken at this time. Action items FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL will be set for Regular Meetings. LECTURE ROOM INFORMATIONAL MEETING 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF M.A.C. -COMMITTEE 3. PROPONENTS OF THE RECOMMENDATION 4. OPPONENTS OF THE RECOMMENDATION 5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION o Planning Director o City Attorney o City Administrator 6. COUNCIL DISCUSSION 7. ADJOURNMENT (c) Legal Counsel cautioned Council of the area of prehearing contact with the proposal companies. He also advised Council that at this point they are not required to award the bid, accept MACC recommendations, or authorize more authority to MACC for regulating the franchise holder after the bid award. He did note that if the MACC recommendation was not accepted that Council would have to hire its own consultant, bring staff up to speed regarding the issues surrounding cable TV and hire a consultant to process the RFPs. He felt that this would not be accomplished in less than six months to a year. (d) City Administrator reported feeling strongly that the process to date was above reproach, however, the City Council needs to feel sure that the MACC recommendations met with best interest of the citizens of Tigard. He stressed that if an ordinance were not passed in the near future, the Council would automatically be out of MACC and would have to address the franchise issues on their own. City Administrator felt strong concerns that this would increase costs with a one year + delay in signing an agree- ment and recommended considering an Ordinance on October 26, 1981, to adopt MACC recommendations. He stated this recommendation was due to the fact that MACC report indicates the costs shows Storer-Metro offering govern- ment channels to citizens free and that Liberty is now cutting costs below their original proposal to MACC and felt this was a little on the unfair side. 6. COUNCIL DISCUSSION (a) Council consensus was to have Liberty submit information regarding their proposed level of service and confirming their newly proposed rates; and to. have MACC send a copy of the proposal agreement with Storer-Metro for study and review. 7. ADJOURNMENT: 10:01 P.M. ? bu"LL,)' Deputy Recorder ATTEST: Mayor PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - October 14, 1981 __..._.�� -_... .. . __._ .._....___..". ._- .. ---•---.. .-..-... -.._ _ - . . �-- - - - - - --- -- -- Date ��=�•I ------ - I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council oa the following item: (Please print your name) i Item Description: S ` - Proponent (for) OPPo nt (against) r Name, Address and Affiliation Name, Ad ess an Affiliation � I I i ill Ili " it Da to I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on the following iters: (Please print your name) Item Description: ' �- ` -f`t'Ol ) proponer forOpponent- pp (against) "ame, Address zd Affiliat' n Name, Address and Affiliation - - i1 ozs s.cv, a98 ,�t ti © r,c IN 111�1111� Mon 111111 ii n5 in on d . Cl-, n hrcn ap 1 �7ialattitia!°la�°}'!'1'$rislaia�°iaftii;tpaitil�tit�t�t'T�i�illj7�3�1it�tit.fit���iitlrlt�titl�ia�ai��t�°i°�ti[�i►!°!+,►It!'�a;ail.Lia'aitialalflalal��lalal��°1'laia`atalr't�atala°� NOTE: IF THIS NICROFILhED -- - '1 2 3 4 - _ 5 _ _ 7 $ 9 o DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN All Will - THIS NOTICE. IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWING, __ os sz--ez LZaz sz az sz zziz oz -a;r Illll --sl _-S�r- ti,t _e1_.. zi �i oi—6 ® -9 5 - y — e Z t :nt�soaluu�auaiun�nulaaa��naduae�aapl(Nt�tttalltft�111,���Igjgjl �#ao-ltua� ilili89 etltna�rtNlmtltstt�aut�aaxhtta�t�h ahansaualaua�tataltwit l�naalnu0mduaa�autlnN�uaai plt MARGU 7 : ---- _ �. EXHIBIT IV-1 . : . SERVICE AREA MAP FF `i (RESIDENTIAL SUBSCRIBER NETWORK ONLY) I tet' e WASHINGTON CO. s V ;l LEGEND -----Initial Service Area *. IPC-Information Processing Center Area To Be Built Within 1 Year From Franchise Award LBRBtTT BEA%Ga AREA i I I -__-- Area To Be Built Within 2 Years i From Franchise Award - I Line Extension Policy Area IPC IPC ---- ._ R- - IPC - I _I - 1 AREA WITHIN COUNTY NOT - ILLUSTRATED ON MAP ABOVE j. r IPO APA \ 0 11 2 3 4 S scale in miles couR BORDER - i - '` 7 — CONCUNICATIONS,INC. I I ► 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I , I 1 1 1 1 1 I , IIT r� 1 1 1 1�, T �1 , „ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l i 1 1 1 III I I 1 J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I-1 ..� �.�� ...... �..-��..; ����. :. - int f f ( III ( I I I I I J I ! Ill ( l l l ! � � i! � rf11►TI! I (I ( in I l l � I I I ! l lR � l l l (�i l l � l � i l l � I l I I I l I � I J l � l l l i l l l � I I � X11, r _ Ir NOTE: IF THIS MICROFILMED --._.. 1. - 2 3 Y v 7 8 9 Q 11 12 DRAWING IS LESS CLEAR THAN — - THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO - THE QUALITY OF TIE ORIGINAL _.. DRAWING. OE 62 82 12 9Z SZ 42 E2 ZZ IZ OZ 61 BI fl 91 5f ,1 E1 ZI 11 01 6 B L 9 9 b E7, r