City Council Packet - 07/31/1981 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 13, 1981, 7:30 P.M.
FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
LECTURE ROOM
NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM 14UST SIGN
THEIR NAME ON THE APPROPRIATE SIGN-UP SHEET(S) LOCATED AT
THE BACK OF THE ROOF'!. PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK WILL THEN BE
CALLED FORWARD BY THE CHAIR TO SPEAK ON THE INDICATED ITEM(S) .
AGENDA:
I. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4 . CALL TO AUDIENCE, STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK ON NON-AGENDA
ITEMS.
5. CONSENT AGENDA: (All matters under this heading are considered to be routine
by the City Council and will be enacted in one motion in the
form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of these
items. If discussion is desired by any Council member or member
of the audience, that item will be removed from the consent agenda
and will be considered separately.)
(a) Approval of Minutes: June 19, 22 & 29, 1981
(b) Approval of Expenditures and Investments: $ 481 ,495 66
(c) Written Communications - Receive and File
.Transmittal from Kenneth S. Whorton re: Washington Park 'Loo Fees
.Transmittal from Boundary Review Commission re: Cancellation of Public
Hearings
.Transmittal from Department of Energy re: Workshop on "How To Develop
An Energy Conservation Program In Your City Or County".
.Transmittal from Department of Land Cor-
a�
Approval of Extension Request. Conservation & Development re:
.Transmittal from Department of Land Conservation & Development re:
Special Request For Acknowledgment Of Metro Ordinance (81-105)
For Making Minor Location Changes to Regional Urban Growth Boundaries.
.Transmittal from Department of Land Conservation & Development re:
Administrative Rule on Statewide Goal #5.
.Transmittal from Hank J. March re: New Community Development Block Grant
Cooperation Agreements for July 1, 1982 Through June 30,
.Transmittal from Warren J. Iliff re: Washington Park Zoo 1985.
(d) RESOLUTION No. 81- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING
THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER II�MROVEMENTS KNOWN AS THE
KIMBERLY ()CCOY) SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION, GENERALLY
LOCATED WEST OF SW 98th AVENUE ON SW KIMBERLY DRIVE.
Director of Public Works recommends approval.
y (e) AUTHORIZE MAYOR AND CITY RECORDER TO SIGN ON BEHALF OF THE CITY:
Easement across City property
r pro erty for utility purposes.es. SW O'Mara Chamberlainproperty. - Directoof
Public Works recommends approval.
(f) ACCEPT STREET DECIATION: Tigard United Methodist Church SW Frewing Street
Planning Director recommends approval. (Condition of SDR 57-79 & MJ P 17-78) .
(g) ACCEPT NON-REMONSTRANCE AGREEMENT: Scoffins Condos - 8600 SW Scoffins Street
(Tax Map 2S1 2AD, Tax Lots 200) - Planning Director recommends approval.
(CundiLion of SDR 15-811
(h) APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE MAYOR AND CITY RECORDER TO EXECUTE ON BEHALF OF
CITY
. Subdivision Compliance Agreement and Bond for O'Neel Acres Subdivision.
Director of Public Works recommends approval.
6. ORDINANCE No. 81- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.28, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL
CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28.130 TO PROHIBIT PARKING
ON A PORTION OF THE NORTH SIDE OF SW GAARDE STREET FROM SW
112TH AVENUE EAST 720 FEET, DECLARING AN E14ERGENCY AND FIXING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) Recommendation by Finance Director.
7. ORDINANCE No. 81- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.28, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL
CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28.130 TO PROHIBIT PARKING
ON A PORTION OF SW MAIN STREET, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND
FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) Recommendation by Finance Director.
8. RESOLUTION No. 81- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL REQUESTING AN ANNEXATION
PETITION BE FORWARDED TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW COMMISSION
(SHORT TITLE - TOZER) .
(a) Recommendation by Planning Director.
9. RESOLUTION No. 81- A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION No. 81-68 BY CHANGING THE
ASSIGNED NUMBER OF THE TIGARDVILLE HEIGHTS LID.
(a) Recommendation by Finance Director.
10. RESOLUTION No. 81- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING APPOINTMENT
TO THE TIGARD LIBRARY BOARD.
(a) Recommendation by Selection Committee.
11. RESOLUTION No. 81- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING APPOINTMENT
TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
(a) Recommendation by Selection Committee.
8:00 P.M. PUBLIC NOTICE HEARING
12. ZONE CHANGE ZC 16-81 (PORTLAND CHAIN/TOYS "R" Us) NPO #2
A reugest by Portland Chain for a zone change from M-4 Industrial Park to
C-3 Retail Commercail on a 4.58 acre parcel od SW Cascade Blvd. , south of SW Scholls
Ferry Road. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 1S1 26C, Tax Lot southern portion of 1802) .
(a) Recommendation of Planning Commission
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 13, 1981
(b) Consideration by Council
(c) ORDINANCE No. 81- AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AN
APPLICATION FOR A ZONE CHANGE TO THE 1975 NPO 912 PLAN MAP
OF THE CITY OF TIGARD DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Portland Chair /Toys "R" US)
8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARINGS
13. SW 74TH AVENUE STREET VACATION
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Summation by Planning Director
(c) Public Testimony
Proponents
Opponents
Cross Examination
(d) Recommendation of Planning Director
(e) Public Hearing Closed
(f) Consideration by Council
(g) ORDINANCE No. 81- AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF SW 74TH AVENUE,
A 40 FOOT WIDE DEDICATED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, IN THE
CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, RECORDING
A14 EFFECTIVE DATE.
14 . SW TIGARDVILLE HEIGHTS - PROPOSED STREET LT'.PROVEMENT DISTRICT
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Summation by Project Engineer
(c) Public Testimony
Proponents
Opponents
Cross Examination
(d) Recommendation of Project Engineer
(e) Public Hearing Closed
(f) Consideration z-_vy_
- � l,V ll Ll l:ll
(g) ORDINANCE No. 81- Asti ORDINANCE CONFIRMING AND RATIFYING THE RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF JUNE 22, 1981, WITH RESPECT TO TIGARDVILLE
H;ETGHTS - STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID 9123) ; APPROVING,
RATIFYING AND ADOPTING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS; DECLARING RESULTS
OF HEARING HELD WITH RESPECT THERETO; DIRECTING SOLICITATION
OF BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION; PROVIDING FOR THE MAKING OF SAID
IMPROVEMENTS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
8:00 P.M. PUBLIC NOTICE HEARINGS
15. SW WALNUT STREET LID
(a) Report by Finance Director - receipt of written remonstrances
(b) Consideration by Council
(c) ORDINANCE No. 81- AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE FINAL COST OF SEWER
IMPROVEMENTS IN THE SOUTHWEST WALNUT STREET SANITARY
SEWER LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID 9120), RATIFYING AND
n ADOPTING THE APFvRTIONMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF THE COST TO
t
RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE DISTRICT, SPREADING
THE ASSESSMENT AND DIRECTING THE ENTRY OF ASSESS14ENTS
IN THE LIEN DOCKET.
PAGE 3 - COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 13, 1981
16. SW 74TH AVENUE SEWER LID
(a) RepvrL by pyo-*eCl E^ receiof written remonstrances
.b�...-ce�-r- pt-
(b) Consideration by Council
(c) ORDINANCE No. 81- AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE FINAL COST OF SEWER
IMPROVEMENTS IN THE SOUTHWEST 74TH AVENUE SANITARY SEWER
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, RATIFYING AND ADOPTING TILE
APPORTIONMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF THE COST TO RESPECTIVE
PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE DISTRICT, SPREADING THE
ASSESSMENT AND DIRECTING THE ENTRY OF ASSESSMENTS IN
THE LIEN DOCKET.
17. SW 92ND AVENUE SEWER LID
(a) Report by Finance Director - receipt of written remonstrances
(b) Consideration by Council
(c) ORDINANCE No. 81- AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE FINAL COST OF SEWER
IMPROVEMENTS IN THE SOUTHWEST 92ND AVENUE SEWER LOCAL
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID #24), RATIFYING AND ADOPTING
THE APPORTIONMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF THE COST TO
RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE DISTRICT, SPREADING
THE ASSESSMENT AND DIRECTING THE ENTRY OF ASSESSMENTS
IN THE LIEN DOCKET.
18. ORDINANCE No. 81- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 81-43 RELATING TO
THE SW TIEDEMAN STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID 1129) ;
CHANGING THE DATES FOR THE SOLICITATION OF BIDS FOR
CONSTRUCTION, ALLOWING THE EXECUTION OF WARRANTS FOR THE
PROJECT, SETTING FORTH THE ASSESSABLE COSTS AND DECLARING
All Ir.E RCENCY
.
(a) Recommendation of Finance Director.
19. ORDINANCE No. 81- AN ORDINANCE A14ENDING ORDINANCE No. 81-42 RELATING TO
THE SW KNOLL DRIVE SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID #26) ;
CHANGING THE DATES FOR THE SOLICITATION OF BIDS FOR
CONSTRUCTION, ALLOWING THE EXECUTION OF WARRANTS FOR THE
PROJECT, SETTING FORTH THE ASSESSABLE COSTS AND DECLARING AM
EMERGENCY.
(a) Recommendation of Finance Director.
20. AGREEMENT APPROVAL FOR TSM PROJECT POWER CONSUPTION FOR THE SIGNALS - Authorize
Mayor & City Recorder to sign.
(a) Recommendation of Finance Director.
21. PROGRESS PAYMENT #2 FOR MC DONALD LID - Approval for $31,722.12
(a) Recommendation of Finance Director.
22. STATUS REPORT ON CROW BUILDING LEASE
(a) Report by Mayor.
23. CANVASS OF VOTES - BIKE LEVY - June 30, 1981 Election
(a) Report by City Recorder.
PAGE 4 - COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 13, 1981
24. STATUS REPORT ON T.C.Y.C. & LOAVES AND FISHES LEVIES
on (a) Comments by Finan,` Director and Mayor.
25. UNITIED NATIONS COMMITTEE. REPRESENTATIVE
(a) Recommendation of Mayor.
26. CIVIC CENTER COMMITTEE
(a) Discussion by Council.
27. STATE REPORT - CITY ADMINISTRATOR APPLICATIONS
(a) ReportbyFinance Director.
28. APPROVE WCCLS AGREEMENT
(a) Recommendation of Head Librarian.
29. OTHER
30. ADJOURNMENT
am
i
PAGE 5 - COUNCIL AGENDA - JULY 13, 1981
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES, JULY 13, 1981, 7:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilmen John Cook, Kenneth Scheckla;
Doris Hartig, Interim Acting City Administrator/Finance Director/City
Recorder; Aldie Howard, Planning Director; Kelley Jennings, Lieutenant
(left at 8:03 P.ii); Ed Sullivan, Legal Counsel; Loreen Wilson, Aduiiuis-
trative Secretary.
2. CALL TO AUDIENCE, STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS.
(a) No one appeared to speak.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 19, 22 & 29, 1981.
(a) Mayor Bishop requested minutes from June 29, 1981, be amended to read as follows:
Page 3, section (1) (new wordage underlined) :
"Mayor Bishop agreed that according to the map the proposed extension is
logical, but stated it is not practical. He cited the unanimous vote of the
Park Board in favor of removing NPO #1 Policy #28. He reviewed the physical
dimensions of the street, comparing them with standards for collector streets.
He felt the cost is a real obstacle assuming additional right-of-way would
have to be purchased from the present owners of expensive homes. His opinion
was that Hall Boulevard would of necessity have to be widened to four lanes
and become "another Sandy Boulevard" to handle the traffic from the residential
areas to downtown Tigard and to Portland.
(b) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to approve minutes
as amended.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
4. APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS: $ 481,495.66
(a) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - Receive and File
.Transmittal from Kenneth S. Whorton re: Washington Park Zoo Fees
.Transmittal from Boundary Review Commission re: Cancellation of Public Hearings
.Transmittal from Department of Energy re: Workshop on "How To Develop An Energy
Conservation Program In Your City Or County".
.Transmittal from Department of Land Conservation & Development re: Approval of
Extension Request.
.Transmittal from Department of Land Conservation & Development re: Special Request
For Acknowledgment Of Metro Ordinance (81-105) For Making Minor Location Changes
to Regional Urban Growth Boundaries.
.Transmittal from Department of Land Conservation & Development re: Administrative
Rule on Statewide Goal #5
.Transmittal from Hank J. March re: New Community Development Block Grant Coopers-
tion Agreements for July 1, 1982 through June 30, 1985.
.Transmittal from Warren J. Iliff re: Washington Park Zoo
(a) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to receive and file.
Approved by unanimous votp of Council nrpspnt:.
6. RESOLUTION No. 81-78 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS KNOWN AS THE KIMBERLY (141c:COY) ®�
SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION, GENERALLY LOCATED WEST. OF S.W. 98TH
AVENUE ON SW KIMBERLY DRIVE.
(a) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
7. AUTHORIZE MAYOR AND CITY RECORDER TO SIGN ON BEHALF OF CITY.
.Easement across City property for utility purposes. S.W. O'Mara - Chamberlain
property
(a) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to approve and
authorize signature of Mayor and City Recorder.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
8. ACCEPT STREET DEDICATION: Tigard United Methodist Church S.W. Frewing Street
(Condition of SDR 57-79 and MLP 17-78)
(a) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to accept.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
9. ACCEPT NON-REMONSTRANCE AGREEMENT: Scoffins Condos - 8600 S.W. ScDffins Street
(Tax Map 2S1 2AD, Tax Lot 200) - Condition of SDR 15-81.
(a) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to accept.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
10. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE MAYOR AND CITY RECORDER TO EXECUTE ON BEHALF OF CITY
-Subdivision Compliance Agreement and Bond for O'Neel Acres Subdivision.
(a) Motion. by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
11. ORDINANCE NO. 81-56 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.28, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL
CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28. 130 TO PROHIBIT PARKING ON A
PORTION OF THE NORTH SIDE OF SW GAARDE STREET FROM SW 112TH
AVENUE EAST 720 FEET, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) Finance Director stated the Director of Public Works has recommended approval.
(b) Lt Jennings advised Council of the hazardous conditions created in the area by
parking cars and requested approval of the ordinance as proposed.
PAGE 2 - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - July 13, 1981
(c) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
12. ORDINANCE 110. e1_5j AN ORDINANCE AMENDINr �un�nTr„ ,
-'" CHAPTER 1.0.28, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL
CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION 10.28. 130 TO PROHIBIT PARKING ON A
PORTION OF S.W. MAIN STREET, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIX-
117G AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Mayor Bishop to adopt.
(b) Lt. Jennings stated there are some real traffic problems at this intersection
due to parked vehicles which block vision at the intersection of S.W. Burnham
and S.W. Main Streets. Two parking stalls are being requested to be removed.
(c) Mayor Bishop stated he felt only one stall should be removed so as to not make
such an impact on the parking problems for surrounding businesses.
(d) After lengthy discussion, Council suggested this item be considered at a later
meeting when more information is available.
Motion to adopt failed 1-2 vote of Council present, Mayor Bishop and Councilman
Scheckla voting nay.
(e) Motion by Councilman Scheckla, seconded by Councilman Cook to reconsider
Ordinance No. 83-57 in one week.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
(f) Mayor Bishop requested that staff advise the business people of this type of
consideration before it is brought to Council attention in the future.
Lt. Jennings left 8:03 P.M.
13. RESOLUTION No. 81-79 A RFcOLUTT.,,,,
�O. OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL REQUESTING AN ANNEXA-
TION PETITION BE FORWARDED TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW COMMISSION.
(Short Title - Tozer.)
(a) Planning Director recommended approval noting that this does not create an island.
(b) Mr. LaValle Allen, 754O S,W, Hermosa Way, NPO
#4 Chaian2il of
his concern regarding the legality of this annexationrreequestvised sinceCthe cproperty
in question was already annexed by BRC #1688 and is scheduled for election by
the people in August to see whether the annexation would be upheld.
(c) Legal Counsel stated that he saw no problem with this issue since the annexation
request under consideration had 100% of the property signed for annexation.
Also the hearing on this request would be held after the election date.
(d) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
i
PAGE 3 -REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - July 13, 1981
r
•a
14. RESOLUTION No. 81-80 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 81-68 BY CHANGING THE
�'- ASSIGNED NUMBER OF THE TIGARDVILLE HEIGHTS LID.
(a) Finance Director requested approval noting that this would correct a clerical
error on Resolution No. 81-68_
MUM
(b) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
ROOM 15: RESOLUTION No. 81- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL. MAKING APPOINTMENT TO
THE TIGARD LIBRARY BOARD.
(a) Mayor Bishop stated that the Selection Committee had not completed the inter-
views for this position and that this item would not be considered at this time.
16. RESOLUTION No. 81- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING APPOINTMENT
TO THE PLANNING COMMISION.
(a) Mayor Bishop stated that the Selection Committee had not completed the inter-
views for this position and that this item would not be considered at this
time.
8:00 P.M. PUBLIC NOTICE HEARING
17. ZONE CHANGE ZC 16-81 (PORTLAND CHAIN/TOYS "R" US) NPO 462
A request by Portland Chain for a zone change from M-4 Industrial Park to C-3
Retail Commercial on a 4.58 acre parcel on SW Cascade Blvd. , south of S.W. Scholls
Ferry Road. (Wash. Co. Tax Map iSl Z6C, Tax Lot southern portion of 1802) .
(a) Planning Directer stated that the Planning Commission had recommended approval.
(b) ORDINANCE No. 81-58 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AN APPLICA-
TION FOR A ZONE CHANGE TO THE 1975 NPO 462 PLAN MAP OF THE
CITY OF TIGARD DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFEC-
TIVE DATE. (Portland Chain/Toys "R" US) .
(c) Motion by Councilman Scheckla, seconded by Councilman Cook to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARINGS
18. S.W. 74TH AVENUE STREET VACATION
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Planning Director advised Council that this was a condition of the development
of the land surrounding this area and that this street was not being used by
the public.
(c) Public Testimony
PAGE 4 - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - July 13, 1981
mom
No one appeared to speak.
(d) Planning Director recommended approval.
(e) Fublic l:eari ing ^lysed mom
(f) ORDINANCE No. 81-59 AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF S.W. 74TH AVENUE, A
40 FOOT WIDE DEDICATED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, IN THE CITY
OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, RECORDING AN EFFEC-
TIVE DATE.
(g) Motion by Councilman Scheckla, seconded by Councilman Cook to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
19. S.W. TIGARDVILLE HEIGHTS - PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Project Engineer, Stu Cato from Harris & McMonagle Engineers, advised Council
of the proposed assessment district and noted the improvements suggested by
the City. Elrose Street would receive a full street improvement and 97th and
McDonald streets would receive additional street width, sidewalks and storm
drainage. He noted that the assessments along McDonald and 97th Avenue would
be assessed half of the cost per lot and the other half of the assessment
would be per front footage of the lots.
The City would pay about $27,300 from SDC funds if McDonald and 97th Avenue
were improved to collector strect standards.
(c) Public Testimony
Proponents
No one appeared to speak.
Opponents
Arlie Mawhirter, 14266 S.W. 80th Place, stated that he opposed the proposed
improvements due to the high cost and the possible loss of access to his
garages. He also filed a letter of remonstrance with the City Recorder with
signatures of the owners of tax lots 300,302,500, 104, and 200.
Paul Deemie, 9740 S.W. McDonald, opposed the improvements due to cost and
safety hazard which would be created by making his driveway shorter.
Judy Deemie, 9740 S.W. McDonald, opposed the requirement of storm drains
along McDonald street since there are no apparant drainage problems at this
time and opposed sidewalks and curbs being placed along the street. She
expressed concern regarding the high cost of the project.
Ms Aase B. Otto, 14200 S.W. 97th Avenue, owner of tax lots 100,106 & 107,
questioned the method of assessment and the cost of the improvement.
PAGE 5 - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - July 13, 1981
MOM-
Cr Exa=ination
Mr. Stu Cato, Council and Opponents discussed the method of assessment and
how this affected individual lots. Mr. Cato suggested that since the major-
ity of the owners along McDonald Street were opposed to the development
that they could be excluded from the district if that met with Council
wishes, but improve 97th Avenue completely.
(d) Public Hearing closed.
(e) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by councilman Scheckla to table for approx-
imately two weeks until staff can meet and discuss the questions and problems
with property owners.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
(f) Legal Counsel stated a new public hearing would need to be held with advertis-
ing placed in the local newspaper.
8:00 P.M. PUBLIC NOTICE HEARINGS
20. S.W. WALNUT STREET LID
(a) Finance Director reported that no remonstrances had been received and recom-
mended approval.
(b) ORDINANCE No. 81-60 AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE FINAL COST OF SEWER IMPROVE-
MENTS IN THE SOUTHWEST WALNUT STREET SANITARY SEWER LOCAL
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID 420) , RATIFYING AND ADOPTING THE
THE APPORTIONMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF THE COST TO RESPECTIVE
PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE DISTRICT, SPREADING THE ASSESS-
MAENT AND DIRECTING THE ENTRY OF ASSESSMENTS IN THE LIEN
DOCKET.
(c) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
21. S.W. 74TH AVENUE SEWER LID
(a) Finance Director reported that no remonstrances had been received and recommend-
ed approval.
(b) Mr. David Murray, Project Engineer from James Montgomery Engineers, reported
has.. b.,.�. 7 L Ll �^ F $J3,73V.V7.
the Project has een completed and the assessable costs of
(c) ORDINANCE No. 81-61 AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE FINAL COST OF SEWER IMPROVE-
MENTS IN THE SOUTHWEST 74TH AVENUE SANITARY SEWER LOCAL
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, RATIFYING AND ADOPTING THE APPORTION-
MENT AND ASSESSMENT OF THE COST TO RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF
LAND WITHIN THE DISTRICT,, SPREADING THE ASSESSMENT AND
DIRECTING THE ENTRY OF ASSESSMENT IN THE LIEN DOCKET.
(d) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present .
22. S.W. 92ND AVENUE SEWER LID
(a) Finance Director reported that no remonstrances had been received and recom-
mended approval.
(b) Ms. Beatrice Shewmaker, 11270 S.W. 92nd Avenue questioned the process of getting
Bancroft funding on the assessment. The Finance Director explained the process
for applying for bancroft funding.
(c) ORDINANCE No. 81-62 AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE FINAL COST OF SEWER IMPROVE-
MENTS IN THE SOUTHWEST 92ND AVENUE SEWER LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (LID #24) , RATIFYING AND ADOPTING THE APPORTIONMENT
PAGE 6 - REGULAR. COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - July 13, 1981
AND ASSESSMENT OF THE COST TO RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF LAND
WITHIN THE DISTRICT, SPREADING THE ASSESSMENT AND DIRECT-
ING THE ENTRY OF ASSESSMENTS IN THE LIEN DOCKET.
(d) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
RECESS: 9:32 P.M.
RECONVENE! 9?44 P,M.
21. ORDINANCE No. 81-63 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 81-43 RELATING TO THE S.W.
TIEDEMAN STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID 4x29) ; CHANG-
ING THE DATES FOR THE SOLICITATION OF BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION,
ALLOWING THE EXECUTION OF WARRANTS FOR THE PROJECT, SETTING
FORTH THE ASSESSABLE COSTS AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
(a) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to adopt.
(b) Finance Director advised Council this would change the bid opening date from
July 16th to Jury 27th.
Motion to adopt approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
24. ORDINANCE No. 81-64 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 81-42 RELATING TO THE
SW KNOLL DRIVE SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (LID 426) ; CHANGING
THE DATES FOR THE SOLICITATION OF BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION,
ALLOWING THE EXECUTION OF WARRANTS FOR THE PROJECT, SETTING
FORTH THE ASSESSABLE COSTS AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
(a) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
25. AGREEMENT APPROVAL FOR TSM PROJECT POWER CONSUMPTION FOR THE SIGNALS - Authorize
Mayor and City Recorder to sign.
(a) Finance Director stated that the agreement provided for the city to pay for
power costs for the following signals in the TSM project.
S.W. 69th Avenue, S.W. Pfaffle Street, S.W. Greenburg Road, S.W. Johnson
Street, S.W. Walnut Street, S.W. Garrett Street, S.W. Park Street, S.W. McDonald
Street, S.W. Bull Mountain Road and S.W. Durham Road.
She recommended Council approval.
(b) Motion by Councilman Scheckla, seconded by Councilman Cook to approve and
authorize the Mayor and City Recorder to sign the agreement on behalf of
the City.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
26. PROGRESS PAYMENT #2 FOR McDONALD STREET LID.
(a) Finance Director requested Council approve payment for the June 30, 1981, bills
for the McDonald Street LID costs. MEM Corporation for $31 ,722. 12 (Progress
payment #2 for the LID) and Dorner and Tunks Engineers for $6,000.
(b) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to approve the pay-
ments and direct the bills to be paid out of the 1980-81 fiscal year budget.
PAGE 7 - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - July 13, 1981
�. MEN®
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
27. STATUS REPORT ON CROW BUILDING LEASE
(a) Mayor Bishop stated that Mr. Crow wants to lease uj_Lhei the eati re lower
floor or both floors to the City. He stated that an elevator would have
to be installed in order to meet the state code for handicap access if the
City were to use the second floor of the Crow building. Elevator cost was
noted to be $25 - $35,000.
Mayor Bishop requested Legal Counsel check if the state statutes would allow
the City to put in the elevator within 1 year after occupancy of the build-
ing. He noted this would be considered at a later meeting when further in-
formation was available.
28. CANVASS OF VOTES - BIKE LEVY - June 30, 1981 election
(a) Finance Director noted that 656 votes were for the levy funding and 323 were
against the funding. Since there were only twelve ( 12) absentee ballots,
there should be no change by anyone contesting the election due to the last
minute change in the ballot language.
(b) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to accept the
canvass of votes as presented.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
29. STATUS REPORT ON TCYS AND LOAVES AND FISHES LEVIES
mama
(a) Legal Counsel reported that the Attorney General's office has made an informal
opinion that the ballots, statewide, were invalid. He stated that the formal
opinion would be forthcoming from the Attorney General's office soon.
(b) Finance Director advised Council that she had requested an extension from the
l�to the
County Assessor for the levying of taxes uuauc�: levy qu2St10nS for 1CyJ
and Loaves and Fishes. She noted that if another election were required
that August 11th is the filing date for the September 15th ballot.
30. HOUSE BILL 2483
(a) Finance Director advised Council that the League of Oregon Cities had called
the City and requested that Council and staff phone or send a letter to the
Governor asking him to veto House Bill 2483 which will be presented soon for
his signature. This bill is to eliminate the July 1 date for binding arbitra-
tion.
(b) Legal Counsel suggested a letter might be more appropriate than a phone call
to the governor's office.
(c) Council to let Financ. A rector know within a couple of days if they wish
the City to pursue the matter. Council expressed concern that the July 1st
date is essential to have the budget prepared in a timely manner each year.
31 . UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVE
(a) Mayor.Bishop suggested the Council approve appointment of Mike Johnson of the
Management Center Four on Cascade Avenue which trains low income and disabled
PAGE 8 - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - July 13, 1981
persons with skills for the job market. Mayor Bishop requested that Council
approve the appointment contingent upon his acceptance.
by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla toYt Mike
Johnson to the United National Committee subject to the Mayor'sinterview
and approval.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
32. CIVIC CENTER COMMITTEE
(a) Mayor Bishop requested Council add Mr. J. Allan Paterson, Carol Weaver and
Vern Christensen to the executive committee for the Civic Center.
(b) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Mayor Bishop to approve appointments.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
(c) Mayor Bishop requested Council approve the following seven (7) goals for the
committee. Once these are approved, then the committee could begin their
task.
I. To review and study the Fanno Creek Park Master Plan by ORB Organiza-
tion that was approved by the Park Board and the City Council in the
spring of 1980 as the future site for the Civic Center-Library complex.
(To review this in light of today's needs and economic realities.)
2. To review and study the nnccihilit..
y of the Crow Engineering Building for
a Civic Center-Library complex. (Work with City negotiaters on this) .
3. Compare this proposed site and building with others that might be
available within the city.
4. To work *pith City Staff and each of the department heads to determine
the space needs of the City during the next 5, 10, and 20 years.
5. To seek out professional help, with the authorization of the City Council,
to determine: a) space needs b) appraisal costs c) remodeling costs d)
full costs of a Civic Center-Library complex by stages.
5. Review and give Council a composite cost of present city office costs.
a) City Hall b) library c) police dept. d) Municipal Court e) other.
7. Develop and submit to the City Council a campaign strategey for voter
approval of a new civic center: a) total amount needed b) expanded
Citizens Committee of several hundred c) time schedule and d) date of
proposed election.
(d) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to adopt the goals
1-7 and notify the honorary chairmen, and vice chairmen and co-chairmen to
proceed to call the committee together to work on the goals adopted by Council
and report regularly to the Council of the progress of the committee, a mini-
mum of once a month.
PAGE 9 - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - July 13, 1981
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
33. STATUS REPORT - CITY ADMINISTRATOR APPLICATIONS
.-..a t;::a cc .. .-.. f.^.r 3;n�rinns bgi� been
(a/ Fl aatace Director repor-1 d 65 request, ^.iY�- e
received and to date four (4) have been returned. The closing of applica-
tions acceptance is July 17, 1981. Helen Terry will receive the applications
about the 20th and will finish the process by the 8th of August when the
assessment center is scheduled.
34. APPROVE WCCLS AGREEMENT
(a) Head Librarian requested Council approve a contract with WCCLS for $74,510 for
the fiscal year funding for 1981-82. This is $3,000 less than last year based
on percent of county wide out of town circulation figures.
(b) After discussing the wordage of the contract, Councilman Cook moved to
accept and authorize the Mayor and City Recorder to execute on behalf of
the City. Motion seconded by Councilman Scheckla.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council present.
35. OTHER
(a) Mayor Bishop expressed appreciation to Linda Sargent for her memorandum
regarding Washington County Community Block Grant Development Committee
meeting of June 25th.
Discussion followed regarding the low income areas of Tigard for housing
assistance.
(b) Planning Director requested Council set a date to meet with the Downtown
Committee to begin reviewing and interviewing the consultants for the plan.
Consensus of Council was to meet with the committee on July 20th, 1981, and
set up a time schedule for consultant interviews.
(c) Legal Counsel stated that he and his staff at Council request are looking
over the possibility of the City's compliance with Goal No. 10 with the
current comarehensive plan as submitted to LCDC. He stated that at this
time he feels the plan would not pass on Goal No. 10. Legal Counsel will
report back to Council when he has set out his suggestions to help the City's
plan comply with Goal No. 10.
(d) Legal Counsel advised Council that he is working with Planning Staff to
revise administrative provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and will hope to
have these to Council by August or September.
0
36. ADJOURNMENT 10:31 P.M.
City Recoxder
ATTEST:
t
Mayo r
PAGE 10 - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - July 13, 1981
Date 7/18/81
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following items (Please print your name)
AGENDA ITEM # 14
Item Description:
SW TIGARDVILLE HEIGHTS LID PROPOSAL
roponent (for) Opponent (against)
arae, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
Lo7`2Q0
encs•rG'• 11�,�
i -
Da to
`. I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please Drint your name)
Item Description:
AGENDA ITEM 15
SW WALNUT STREET LID
reponent (for) Opponent (against)
-ame, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
/lit s
All
�t -
E
Date 7/13/81
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print your name)
item Descrio tion: AGENDA ITEM # 17
sW o2...,a -VE SEWER LID
roponent (for) Opponent (against)
lame, Address and Affiliation Name, Address and Affiliation
►�it
PAYMENT OF BILLS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL
PROGRAM R1iTlrF.T 3LTP:E 30, 1941
Community Protection
Police 24,871 .63
Public Works 14, 108.37
Municipal Court 350.29
Planning 1 ,883.54
Building 1 ,256.65
Total Community Protection 42,470.48
Home & Community Quality
Public Works 151 , 135.30
Social Services
Library 1 ,274.07
Aged Services
Youth Services
Historical
Total Social Services 1 ,274.07
Policy & Administration
Mayor & Council 1 ,274.41
Administration 842. 17
Finance 965.34
Total Policy & Administration 3,081 .92
City Wide Support Functions
Non-departmental 17.379.87
Misc. Accounts (refunds & payroll deductions, etc.) 29.478.23
Investments - -7-1;754.27
CAPITOL BUDGET
Community Protections
Road Acquisition & Dev.
Parks Acquisition & Dev. 4,442.43
Storm Drainage
Total Community Protection 4,442.43
Support Services
Building Improvements 11 ,215.73
DEBT SERVICE
General Obligation Bond
Bancroft Bond 50,017.08
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY
Contract 99,246.28
TOTAL AMOUNT OF CHECKS WRITTEN 481 ,495.66
afy 6F IGARD
1�J
CITY OF IAILV AUKiE
GF;EQN 07222
June 19, 1981
Mr. Jack Deines , Presiding Officer District 175
Metropolitan Service District
527 SW Hall Street
Portland, Oreon 37201
Re: Entrance fees to Washington Park Zoo
Dear Mr. Deines :
s •:,- Recently, we received a letter from the City of Tigard
expressing concern over entrance fee increase at Wash-
ington Park Zoo for residents within the metropolitan
area.
r . After discussing, the matter at some length, it was the
concensus of the City Council that they simply did not
possess enough information to make a determination on
this matter. Therefore, they requested that I contact
you for further information on exactly what is the new
Policy, how does it relate to the promises made to the
voters and what were the primary reasons behind the
^ change in policy? Any information on the above questions
Along with any additional information that you may have
e on this matter would be appreciated.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Kenneth S. Whorton
City Manager
KSW/vk
CLACKAMAS
MULTNOMAH
WASHINGTON
7
-Vi V o� -- Vitt
I
320 S.W. STARK STREET(SUITE 530) PORTI N;D, OREGON 97204 PHONE: 229-5307 I
July 7, 1981
To: INTERESTED LOCAL GOVERIM1EN T OFFICIALS AND PROPERTY 011 RS
From: Donald E. Carlson, Executive Officer �J0--'
Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Booundary Commission
Re: Cancellation of Public Hearings
This is to inform you that the Boundary Commission has temporarily
cancelled its public hearings for consideration of annexations and other
boundary change proposals. This action is necessitated because of a lack
of operating funds for the current fiscal year.
The enactment of H.B. 2754 requires the Commission to obtain its funds
through the use of filing fees and assessments against local aovermments
rather than from an appropriation from the state's General Fund as i- has
in the past. To obtain such monies will take time since certain procedures .
must be followed. In the meantime all proposals submitted will be put in
a pending file and will be scheduled for public hearing
thas soon as possible.
The Commission will schedule proposals for hearing in e order iilivhich
they are received.
lVe regret any inconvenience this action may cause, but we have no
alternative. If you have any questions or need additional information,
please contact the office.
DEC/j k
STAFF: COMMISSIONERS:
DONALD E. CARLSON. Executive Officer JAMES L (Jamie) MATER, Chairman ERIC JORGENSEN
KENNETH S. MARTIN, Executive Assistant PETER McDONAL.D, Vice-Chairman FAMA PARTLOW
DENIECE WON, Asst. Admin. Analyst WAYNE ATTESERRY
JEAN KRETZER, Administrative Assistant FRANK EISEM.AN CAROL STEELE
GENE GINTHER MARIE WILLIAMS
i
.�•tom..'s�\•�
�L Department of Energy
Ljo�Anter+ LABOR & INDUSTRIES BUILDING, ROOM 102, SALEM, OREGON 97310 PHONE378-4040
or,..on
June 16 , 1981
Dear btayor:
In July the Oregon Department of Energy will conduct four workshops
on "How to Develop an Energy Conservation Program in Your City or
County". The one-day workshops will emphasize low-cost and no -cost
methods to help local governments save energy and tax dollars.
Workshop topics include how to measure energy used in government
facilities; conservation measures which offer short "payback"
periods ; ways to use current staff and finances to start a city or
county program; energy audits of local government buildings; and
sources of technical assistance and funds .
Each workshop will include an on-site energy audit of a government
building led by an experienced energy auditor. And, each workshop
will help participants develop a list of actions which could conserve
energy in their own jurisdictions.
i'ne workshops are free. They are part of a special technical
assistance program for cities and counties funded by a grant from
the Pacific Northwest Regional Commission. An advisory committee
representing the League of Oregon Cities and the Association of
Oregon Counties guides the technical assistance program.
We believe that there is something every city--large or small--can do
to reduce its energy consumption. These measures need not be elaborate
or costly. Our workshops will help you take a first step--or another
step--toward this goal . We urge you and others from your city to take
advantage of this opportunity and attend one of the workshops.
Sincerely,
Lynn Fra
Di recto
P.S. Announcements of the workshops also are being sent to your
city manager or city recorder. To hold down mailing costs,
announcements have not been sent to other council members,
planning commission members or staff in your city. We would
appreciate your cooperation in informing others of the workshops.
We have enclosed extra copies of both the program announcement
and registration card. Thank you.
HOW TO DEVELOP AN ENERGY CONSERVATION PROi;RAm IN YOUR CITY OR COUNTY
A One-Day Workshop for City and County Officials
Sponsored by the Oregon Department of Energy
in Cooperation with the
Association of Oregon Counties
League of Oregon Cities
Pacific Northwest Regional Commission
Topics at each workshop will include:
MEW
* How to measure energy consumption in city/county facilities
* Low-cost , no-cost measures which your city or county can take to conserve
energy
* Ways to use your current staff and funds to start and sustain an energy
conservation program
* How to evaluate the costs and benefits of energy conservation measures
* Sources of information , assistance and funding for cities and counties
* What the Bonneville Power Administration can do for your city or county
* How to involve your employees in an energy conservation program
* What other cities and counties have done. How. Why. What are the
costs and benefits.
Each workshop will also include:
raudit oa government ung ed V :an oyrnd
All VII-Sift' ��.� gy dif building lhnnricn
r_.
<►uditor
* Time to ask questions of peopla knowledgeable about fleet management ,
streetlighting, recycling, and other topics
* An opportunity to develop a list of actions to conserve energy which
are relevant to your city or county
The format for each workshop will be identical , although each will feature different
speakers. All workshops will last from 9:30 a.m. until 4:30 p.m. Locations and
dates of each workshop are given below.
Please use the enclosed card to register for the workshop of your choice. Lunches
will be provided t-or a.171 pariie3pant5 whose registration cards are
'•CC2ivcu at
least two days before the date of each workshop.
A Workshop will be cancelled if fewer than 1S persons pre-register for it. If
this occurs, persons who have pre-registered will be notified.
DATES AND LOCATIONS
Thursday, July 16 Friday, July 24
ASHLAND TUALATIN
Stevenson Student Union Ramada Inn
Southern Oregon Stare College Off of Interstate S
Tuesday, .July 21 Tuesday, July 28
COTTAGE GROVE LA GRANDE
The Village Green LaGrande Community Center
808 Adams
HOW TO DEVELOP AN ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM IN YOUR CITY OR COUNTY
A One-hay Workshop for City and County Officials
Sponsored by the Oregon Department of Energy
In Cooperation with the
Association of Oregon Counties
League of Oregon. Cities
Pacific Northwest Regional Commission
Topics at each workshop will include:
* How to measure energy consumption in city/county facilities
* Low-cost , no-cost measures which your city or county can take to conserve
energy
* Ways to use your current staff and funds to start and sustain an energy
conservation program
* How to evaluate the costs and benefits of energy conservation measures
* Sources of information, assistance and funding for cities and counties
* What the Bonneville Power Administration can do for your city or county
* How to involve your employees in an energy conservation program
* Wb at other cities and counties have done_ How. Why. What are th,�
costs and benefits.
Each workshop will also include:
* An on-site energy audit of a government building led by an experienced
auditor
* Time to ask questions of people knowledgeable about fleet management ,
streetlighting, recycling, and other topics
* An opportunity to develop a list of actions to conserve energy which
are relevant to your city or county
The format for each workshop will be identical , although each will feature different
speakers_ All workshops will last from 9:30 a-m. until 4:30 p.m. Locations and
dates of each workshop are given below.
Please use the enclosed card to register for the workshop of your choice_ Lunches
LIM wi 11 he provided For all parr i, ,,ts whose registration tar's arc rcc=�' ed at
least two days before the date of each workshop.
i
A workshop will be cancelled if fewer than 15 persons pre-register for it. !f
this occurs , persons who have pre-registered will be notified..
DATES AND LOCATIONS
Thursday, July 16 Friday, July 24
ASHLAND TUALATIN
Stevenson Student Union Ramada Inn
Southern Oregon State College Off of Interstate 5
Tuesday, July 21 Tuesday, July 28
COTTAGE GROVE LA GRANDE
1"he Village Green LaGrande Community Center
808 Adams
F
F'
Department of Land Conservation and Development
VICTOR ATIVEH 1175 COURT STREET N.E., SALEM, OREGON 97310 PHONE (503) 378-4926
July 7, 1981
The Honorable Wilbur Bishop
Mayor, City of Tigard
P.O. Box 23397
Tigard; OR 9 223
Dear Mayor Bishop:
On June 25, 1981, the Commission approved the enclosed order allowing the
Commission to consider your acknowledgment request beyond the 90-day
statutory review period.
This extension order is necessary in order to schedule the large number
of plans received in response to the July 1, 1980 deadline. In some
cases, the Department will ask the Commission to grant additional time
beyond the 90-day period for jurisdictions whose reviews will he held
i
Ater next
year.
Imm
Acknowledgment reviews for the Commission's August 6-7 meeting have been
scheduled. You will be notified when your plan has been scheduled for
Commission review.
Please contact your Field Representative, Linda Macpherson, if you have
any questions concerning the attached order or the review of your
acknowledgment request.
Cordially,
10,
W. J. Kvarsten
Director
WJK:DZ:cp
5934A/5935A
Enclosure
cc: Washington County Board of Commissioners
Sue Klobertanz, Coordinator
Linda Macpherson, Field Representative
Ack. Lead Reviewer File
Jim Knight, DLCD
BEFORE THE
LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF OREGON
IN THE MATTER OF ) COMPLIANCE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
THE CITY OF TIGARD'S REQUEST ) REVIEW POSTPONEMENT
FOR ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF COMPLIANCE )
On July 1, 1980, the City of Tigard, pursuant to ORS 197.251 (1977
Replacement Part), requested that their comprehensive plan and
implementing measures be acknowledged by the Land Conservation and
Development Commission to be in compliance with the Statewide Planning
Goals.
Oregon Law, specifically ORS 197.251(1), requires that the Commission
review and approve or deny the request within 90 days.
The Commission finds, however, that pursuant to ORS 197.251(1) (1977
Replacement Part) the following extenuating circumstance(s) will again
necessitate delay in Coirifn i ss l on review of the co11 preIICflJ l ve plan and
implementing measures of the City of Tigard.
The number and complexity of the acknowledgment requests received
makes it impossible for the Department and Commission to complete all
necessary work in a timely manner. As a result, Commission review of
the plans of certain jurisdictions must occur beyond the 90-day
ol
statutory period.
Commission consideration of this jurisdiction's acknowledgment
request is hereby extended one year and four months beyond the end of the
original statutory review period.
DATED THIS ._2TH DAY OF JULY- 1981
FOR THE COMMISSION:
W. . Kvarsten, Director
partment of Land
Conservation and Development
WJK:DZ:af
5967A/5B
- Department of Lana Conservation and Development
VICTOR ATME11 1175 COURT STREET N.E., SALEM, OREGON 97310 PHONE (503) 378-4926
- GOW-ON
M E M O R A N D U M
July 6, 1981
TO: State and Federal Agencies, Special Districts
Other Local Reviewers and Citizens
FROM: W. J. Kvarsten, Director
SUBJECT: SPECIAL REQUEST FOR ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF METRO ORDINANCE (81-105)
FOR MAKING MINOR LOCATION CHANGES TO REGIONAL UGB
Comments Due: August 20, 1981
Tentative Date for
Commission Action: September 17 & 18, 1981 at a
location to be announced
Jurisdiction Field Representative Lead Reviewer
Metropolitan Service Dist.
CME TRO) Linda Macpherson Greg Winterowd
The Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission has received a request
from the above jurisdiction asking that their procedures and standards for
making locational adjustments to the regional urban growth boundary hconsiders-'
for acknowledgment of compliance with Statewide Planning Goals l ,"2,-3- and 14. u
This notice is tv- a1110i'u yuur agency/you a review opportunity prior to the
Commission's action to make sure that Metro Ordinance 81-105 has been properly
coordinated with your plan and projects for this area,
If you respond to this notice, please distinguish clearly between information or
a comment presented for the Commission's consideration as opposed to an objection
to the Commission's acknowledgment of Metro's Ordinances 81-105. If the Commis-
sion does not receive an objection from a notified agency, it will conclude that
the agency will follow Ordinance 81-105 when seeking or responding to proposals
to make minor adjustments to the regional UGB. Comments and objections should
be sent to the Department's central office in Salem.
WN
MEMO--State and Federal Agencies, Special Districts, July 6, 1981Page 2
Other Local Reviewers and Citizens
Complete copies of Ordinance 81-105 and supporting findings are available for
review in the following locations:
LCDC Central Office LCDC Portland Office
1175 Court Street NE 320 SW Stark, Room 530
Salem, OR 97310 Portland, OR 97204
Contact- Greg Winterowd Contact: Linda Macpherson
ImmPhone: 378-2328 Phone: 229-6068
Metropolitan Service District
527 SW Hall
Portland, OR 97201
Contact: Jill Hinkley
Phone: 221-1646
WJK:CLF
1
J C_
Department of Lena Conservation and Development
VICTOR ATIYEH 1175 COURT STREET N.E., SALEM, OREGON 373140rte' dNE (503) 378-4926
OOV¢Ar3711
M E M O R A N D U M
June 29, 1981
TO: County Chairmen and Judges, Mayors, City and County Planning
Directors, Local Coordinators and Interested Parties
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE RULE ON STATEWIDE GOAL 5
On June 26, 1981, the Commission adopted the enclosed final
administrative rule on Statewide Planning Goal 5.
The Commission directed the Department to conduct several briefing
sessions around the state to provide additional information about how the
rule will be implemented. The following workshops have been scheduled:
n +�
mate Location Contact for Details
June 30 Bend Brent Lake
Cascade Natural Gas Building 388-6424
334 NE Hawthorne
Community Service Pnnm
July 1 Pendleton Jim Kennedy
Pioneer Hall Board Room 963-2918
Blue Mountain Community College
July 10 Salem Crain. Greenleaf
Local Government Center 378-4921
1201 Court Street NE
July 23 Newport Bob Cortright or
Naterlin Community Center Glen Hale
Room 6 265-8869
200 SW Highway 101
July 28 Roseburg Mel Lucas
City Council Chambers 776-6084 or
900 SE Douglas Ave Glen Hale
265-8869
�- July 31 Portland Linda Macpherson
Portland Planning Bureau 229-6068
Room 200
621 SW Alder
-2-
For further information please contact the following staff at 378-4925
(Salem) or 1-800-452-7813 (out of Salem) :
Ed Rochette Administrative Rule Procedures
Claire Puchy Substantive Questions on Rule
Dale Blanton Acknowledgment Scheduling
WjK:CP:cp
5950A
Enclosure
cc: Governor's Office
LCDC Commissioners
Attorney General 's Office
LUBA
DLCD Staff
NMI
MEMO--State and Federal Agencies, Special Districts, July 6, 1981
Other Local Reviewers and Citizens Page 2
Complete copies of Ordinance 81-105 and supporting findings are available for
review in the following locations:
LCDC Central Office LCDC Portland Office
1175 Court Street NE 320 SW Stark, Room 530
Salem, OR 97310 Portland, OR 97204
Contact: Greg Winterowd Contact: Linda Macpherson
Phone: 378-2328 Phone: 229-6068
Metropolitan Service District
527 SW Hall
Portland, OR 97201
Contact: Jill Hinkley
Phone: 221-1646
WJK:CLF
1 BEFORE THE
LAND COP.SERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
2 OF THE STATE OF OREGON
3
IN THE MATTER OF ) FINAL RULE
4 STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL 5 ) OAR 660-16-000
5
6 (1) inventory Glial J Resources
7 The inventory process for Statewide Planning Goal 5 begins with the
8 collection of available data from as many sources as possible including
9 experts in the field, local citizens and landowners. The local
10 government then analyzes and refines the data and determines whether
11 there is sufficient information on the location, quality and quantity of
12 each resource site to properly complete the Goal 5 process. This
13 analysis also includes wheLher a particular natural are8 is °colo^,rally
14 and scientificall;; significant", or an open space area is "needed", or a
15 scenic area is "outstanding", as outlined in the Goal. Based on the
16 evidence and local government's analysis of those data, the local
17 government then determines which resource sites are of significance and
18 includes those sites on the final plan inventory.
19 A "valid" inventory of a Goal 5 resource under OAR-660-16-000 (1C)
20 must include a determination of the location, quality, and quantity of
21 each of the resource sites. Some Goal 5 resources (e.g. , natural areas,
22 historic sites, mineral and aggregate sites, scenic waterways) are more
23 site-specific than others (e.g., groundwater, energy sources). For
24 site-specific resources, determination of location must include a
25 description or map of the boundaries of the resource site and of the
Page 1
I impact area to he affected, if different. For non-site-specific
2 resources, determination must be as specific as possible.
3 The determination of quality requires some consideration of the
4 resource site's relative value, as compared to other examples of the same
5 resource in at least the jurisdiction itself. A determination of
6 quantity requires onsideratinn of 'th? rplative abundanrp of the resource
y�.w.• , ...y4 11 VJ VVIIJ
7 (of any given quality) . The level of detail that is provided will depend
8 on how much information is available or "obtainable."
9 The inventory completed at the local level, including options
10 OAR-660-16-000 (1A), (iB) and (1C), below, will be adequate for Goal
11 compliance unless it can be shown to be based on inaccurate data, or does
12 not adequately address location, quality or quantity. The issue of
13 adequacv may be raised by the nPnartment V. nkinc+.,. 1..0.+ F_-_GIl
v . t I II1
14 determination is made by the Commission.
15 Based on data collected, analyzed and refined by the local
16 government, as outlined above, a jurisdiction has three basic options:
17 UA) Do Not Include on Inventory
18 Based on information that is available on location, quality and
19 quantity/ the local
quantity,.....,, IIIc IVVaI government might determine that a particular resource
20 site is not important enough to warrant inclusion on the plan inventory,
21 or is not required to be included in the inventory based on the specific
22 Goal standards. No further action reed be taken with regard to these
23 sites. The local government is not required to justify in its
24 comprehensive plan a decision not to include a particular site in the
25 plan inventory unless challenged by the Department, objectors or the
Page 2
I Commission based upon contradictory information.
2 (16) Delay Goal 5 Process
3 When some information is available, indicating the possible existence
4 of a resource site, but that information is not adequate to identify with
5 particularity the location, quality and quantity of the resource site,
6 the local aovernment should only include the site on the comprehensive
7 plan inventory as a special category. The local government must express
8 its intent relative to the resource site through a plan policy to address
9 that resource site and proceed through the Goal 5 process in the future.
` 10 The plan should include a time-frame for this review. Special
11 implementing measures are not appropriate or required for Goal 5
12 compliance purposes until adequate information is available to enable
13 further review and adoption of such measures. The statement in the plan
14 commits the local government to address the resource site through the
15 Goal 5 process in the post-acknowledgment period. Such future actions
1F
could require a plan amendment.
17 GO Include on Plan Inventory
18 When information is available on location
quality and quantity, and
19 the local government has determined a site to be significant or important
20 as a result of the data collection and analysis process, the local
21 government must include the site on its plan inventory and indicate the
22 location, quality and quantity of the resource site (see above). Items
23 included on this inventory must proceed through the remainder of the
24 Goal 5 process.
25
!. Page 3
1 (2) Identify Conflicting Uses
2 It is the responsibility of local government to identify conflicts
3 with inventoried Goal 5 resource sites. This is done primarily by
4 examining the uses allowed in broad zoning districts established by the
F rand anrie-�tili-M-Al 7nnACIl conflicting use is
jurisdiction (e.g., forest o. ..est..., _,. , -
A
6 one which, if allowed, could negatively impact a Goal 5 resource site.
7 Where conflicting uses have been identified, Goal 5 resource sites may
8 impact those uses. These impacts must be considered in analyzing the
9 economic, social, environmental and energy (ESEE) consequences.
10 (2A) Preserve the Resource Site
11 If there are no conflicting uses for an identified resource site, the
12 jurisdiction must adopt policies and ordinance provisions, as
13 appropriate, which insure -P r esel YCit I on of the r c s c u r c S i tc.
14 (2B) Determine the Economic, Social, Environmental ,
15 and Energy Consequences
16 If conflicting uses are identified, the economic, social,
17 environmental and energy consequences of the conflicting uses must be
18 determined. Both the impacts on the resource site and on the conflicting
19 use must be considered in analyzing the ESEE consequences. The
20 applicability and requirements of other Statewide Planning Goals must
21 also be considered, where appropriate, at this stage of the process. A
22 determination of the ESEE consequences of identified conflicting uses is
23 adequate if it enables a jurisdiction to provide reasons to explain why
24 decisions are made for specific sites.
25 //
Page 4
1 (3) Develop Program to Achieve the Goal
2 Based on the determination of the economic, social , environmental and
3 energy consequences, a jurisdiction must "develop a program to achieve
4 the Goal." Assuming there is adequate information on the location,
5 quality, and quantity of the resource site as well as on the nature of
6 tha rnnflie-tinn „-eo �nA cccc
y .. consequences, a jurisdiction is expected to
7 "resolve" conflicts with specific sites in any of the following three
8 ways listed below. Compliance with Goal 5 shall also be based on the
9 plan's overall ability to protect and conserve each Goal 5 resource. The
10 issue of adequacy of the overall program adopted or of decisions made
11 under (3A), (3B) and (3C) below may be raised by the Department or
12 objectors, but final determination is made by the Commission, pursuant to
13 usual procedures.
14 (3A) Protect the Resource Site
15 Based on the analysis of the ESEE consequences, a jurisdiction may
16 determine the �
r. �„� resource site is of sucla importance, relative to the
17 conflicting uses, and the ESEE consequences of allowing conflicting uses
18 are so great that the resource site should be protected and all
19 conflicting uses prohibited on the site and possibly within the impact
20 area identified in OAR 660-16-000 (1C). Reasons which support this
21 decision must be presented in the comprehensive plan, and plan and zone
22 designations must be consistent with this decision.
23 (3B) Allow Conflicting lases Fully
24 Based on the analysis of ESEE consequences and other Statewide Goals,
25 a jurisdiction may determine that th�,a conflicting use should be allowed
Page 5
I fully, not withstanding the possible impacts on the resource site. This
2 approach may be used when the conflicting use for a particular site is of
3 sufficient importance, relative to the resource site. Reasons which
4 support this decision must be presented in the comprehensive plan, and
5 plan and zone designations must be consistent with this decision.
g (3C) Limit Conflicting Uses
7 Based on the analysis of ESEE consequences, a jurisdiction may
8 determine that both the resource site and the conflicting use are
9 important relative to each other, and that the ESEE consequences should
10 be balanced so as to allow the conflicting use but in a limited way so as
11 to protect the resource site to some desired extent. To implement this
12 decision, the jt!risdiction must designate with certainty what uses and
13 activities are allowed fully, what uses and activities are not allowed at
14 all and which uses are allowed conditionally, and what specific standards
15 or limitations are placed on the permitted and conditional uses and
16 activities for each resource site. Whatever mechanisms are used, they
17 must be specific enough so that affected property owners are able to
t =l l owed s or allowed
18 determine what lJSflS and activities are allowed, r�ua. ... .....__
19 conditionally and under what clear and objective conditions or
20 standards. Reasons which support this decision must be presented in the
21 comprehensive plan, and plan and zone designations .must be consistent
22 with this decision.
23 (4) Post-Acknowledgment Period
24 All data, findings, and decisions made by a local government prior to
25 acknowledgment may be reviewed by that local government in its periodic
Page 6
I update process. This includes decisions made as a result of
2 OAR 660-116-000 11A)a l7df
s - 4 changes,� and ( � Any ne�s Ci�S, or deletions
l ��••i7
3 would be made as a plan amendment, again following all Goal 5 steps.
4 If the local government has included in its plan items under
5 OAR 660-16-000 (1B), the local government has committed itself to take
6 certain actions within a certain time frame in the post-acknowledgment
7 period. Within those stated time frames, the local government must
8 address the issue as stated in its plan, and treat the action as a plan
9 amendment.
10 (5) Landowner Involvement
11 The development of inventory data, identification of conflicting uses
12 and adoption of implementing measures must, under Statewide Planning
13 Goals 1 and 2, provide opportunities for citizen involvement and agency
14 coordination. In addition, the adoption of regulations or plan
15 provisions carries with it basic legal notice requirements. (County or
16 city legal counsel can advise the planning department and governing body
17 of these requirements.) Depending upon the type of action involved, the
18 form and method of landowner notification will vary. State statutes and
19 local charter provisions contain basic notice requirements. Because of
20 the nature of the Goal 5 process as outlined in this paper it is
21 important to provide for notification and involvement of landowners,
22 including public agencies, at the earliest possible opportunity. This
23 will likely avoid problems or disagreements later in the process and
24 improve the local decision-making process in the development of the plan
25 and implementing measures.
+ Page 7
I As the Goal 5 process progresses and more specificity about the
2 nature of resources, identified conflicting uses, ESEE consequences and
3 implementing measures is known, notice and involvement of affected
4 parties will become more meaningful. Such notice and landowner
5 involvement, although not identified as a Goal 5 requirement is in the
6 opinion of the Commission, imperative.
7 (6) Policy Application
8 OAR 660-16-000 is applicable to jurisdictions as specified below:
9 Category 1
_ 10 Compliance with OAR 660-16-000 is required prior to granting
11 acknowledgment of compliance under ORS 197.251 and OAR 660-03-000 through
12 OAR 660-03-040 for those jurisdictions which:
13 a. have not submitted their comprehensive plan for acknowledgment
14 as of the date of adoption of this rule.
15 b. are under denial orders as of the date of adoption of this rule.
16 C. are not scheduled for review prior to or at the June 1981
17 Commission meeting.
18 Category2
19 Compliance with OAR 660-16-000 is required as outlined below for those
20 jurisdictions which:
21 a. are under continuance orders adopted pursuant to OAR 660-03-040.
22 b. are scheduled for review at the April 30/May 1, May 29 or June
23 1981 Commission meetings.
24 For these jurisdictions a notice will be given to all parties on the
25 original notice list providing a 45-day period to object to the plan
Page 8
Y
I based on OAR 660-16-000.
2 OAR 660-16-000 will be applied based on objections alleging
3 violations of specific provisions of the rule on specific resource
4 sites. Objections must be filed following requirements outlined in
5 OAR 660-03-000 through OAR 660-03-040 (Acknowledgment of Compliance
6 Rule). Where no objections are filed or objections are not specific as
7 to which elements of OAR 660-16-000 have been violated, and on what
8 resource sites, the plan will be reviewed against Goal 5 standards as
9 they existed prior to adoption of OAR 660-16-000.
10 Jurisdictions which receive acknowledgment of compliance (as outlined
11 in ORS 197.251) at the April 30/May 1, 1981 Commission meeting will not
12 be subject to review procedures outlined above, but will be treated as
13 other previously acknowledged jurisdictions.
14
15 DB:CP:cp
5117A
16
17
18
i9
20
21
22
23
24
25
s
Page 9
-- (Periodic Updates) — — 1 COLLECT, DEVELOP DATA (Plan Amendments) —
ON GOAL 5 RESOURCES
ANALYZE, REFINE DATA; DETERMINE
SUFFICIENCY, SIGNIFICANCE, ETC. i
1A �— 1B
I AVAILABLE INFORMATION ON LOCATION, SOME INFORMATION AVAILABLE
! QUALITY AND QUANTITY INDICATES BUT INADEQUATE TO IDENTIFY
I RESOURCE SITE NOT IMPORTANT: THE RESOURCE SITE:
NOT INCLUDED ON PLAN INVENTORY; INCLUDE ON PLAN INVENTORY I
NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED OR AS A SPECIAL CATEGORY;
! APPROPRIATE FOR GOAL 5 COMPLIANCE
i ! ADOPT PLAN STATEMENT TO
ADDRESS THE RESOURCE SITE
AND GOAL 5 PROCESS IN
--i FUTURE, STATING TIME FRAME;
I
1C NO SPECIAL RESTRICTING PLAN
INFORMATION AVAILABLE: POLICIES, ZONING ORDINANCE
PROVISIONS, OR INTERIM REVIEW
PROVIDE INFORMATION ON MECHANISMS REQUIRED OR
I LOCATION, QUALITY, AND APPROPRIATE FOR GOAL 5
QUANTITY AND INCLUDE COMPLIANCE
ON PLAN INVENTORY
I
2 IDENTIFY CONFLICTING USES
i
� 2A � 2^, I1
NO CONFLICTING USES CONFLICTING USES IDENTIFIED:
i IDENTIFIED: 1
DETERMINE ECONOMIC, SOCIAL,
MANAGE RESOURCE SITE ENVIRONMENTAL, ENERGY
SO AS TO PRESERVE CONSEQUENCES CONFLICTING USES
ORIGINAL CHARACTER
` 3 DEVELOP A PROGRAM I
TO ACHIEVE THE GOAL:
I RESOLVE CONFLICTS BASED
ON PRESENTLY AVAILABLE
INFORMATION AND DETERMINATION
OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, ENVIRONMENTAL,
ENERGY CONSEQUENCES:
i
1 3A PRESERVE THE RESOURCE SITE;
3B ALLOW CONFLICTING USE; OR
3C SPECIFICALLY LIMIT CONFLICTING USE
(Pre-acknowledgment)
_(Post-acknowledgment)
---
T �
PERIODIC UPDATES ADDRESS AS STATED IN THE PLA
i-- — THROUGH PLAN AMENDMENTS AS A PLAN AMENDMENT -.-- _—
WASHINGTON COUNTY
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 150 N. FIRST AVENUE
HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 648-8814 OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
64a-Bata
VIRGINIA DAGG,Chairman
LYELL GARDNER,Vice Chairman
JIM FISHER
BONNIE L.HAYS
LUCILLE WARREN
JULY 7, 1981
THE WASHINGTON COUNTY OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INVITES
ALL INTERESTED PARTIES TO ATTEND THE FIRST OF TWO WORKSHOPS
DEALING WITH UTILIZATION OF THE PROJECT PROPOSAL FORMS FOR
THE 1982-1985 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM.
A SECOND WORKSHOP WILL BE HELD IN EARLY OCTOBER, 1981. PROPOSALS
FOR ELIGIBLE BLOCK GRANT ACTIVITIES ARE DUE BY OCTOBER 30, 1981
FOR PROJECTS WHICH WILL BE FUNDED BEGINNING JULY 1, 1JO/-,
THE INITIAL WORKSHOP WILL BE HELD:
JULY 28, 1981 - 10 :00 - 12:00 NOON
CITY OF BEAVERTON OPERATIONS CENTER
9600 S.W. ALLEN BLVD .
i BEAVERTON, OREGON
L
THE PROJECT PROPOSAL PACKET WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE WORKSHOP ,
IF FURTHER INFORMATAION IS DESIRED, PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFICE
OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AT 648-8814.
f(
an equal opportunity employer
a�
WASHINGTON COUNTY
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 150 N. FIRST AVENUE
ore HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123
BOARD OF COMMiSSiONERS OFFICE OF COPAMUNI T Y DEVELOPMENT
VIRGINIA DAGG,Chairman 648-8814
LYELL GARDNER.Vice Chairman
JIM FISHER
BONNIE L.HAYS
LUCILLE WARREN
July 6, 1981 JL � �U�J'
City Council JUL 7 199811
City of Tigard
P.O. Box 23397
Tigard, OR 97223
Dear Mayor and Councilpersons:
As I indicated to those of you with whom I 've airead met with - and to those of you I
will be meeting with in the near future - our existing Community Development Block
Grant Cooperation Agreements expire at the end of the 1981-82 program year, or June
30, 1982.
For the second 3-year cycle - whicn will span the periods from July 1 , 1982 through
June 30, 1985 - it will be necessary to consummate new agreements. To meet HUD require-
ments the new agreements should be executed prior to the beginning of the next federal
fiscal year; consequently, we would appreciate having the enclosed three copies signed
and returned to my office prior to September 14 1981 . Unless you so desire it
won't be necessary for you to have the agreements on the same agenda as my presentation.
With regard to the new agreements, there are some things you should be appraised of,
such as:
(1 ) The language of the new agreement is identical to that of the previous
agreement except for section (7) of page 5.
(2) Section (7) was changed in order to bring us into compliance with the 1980
Act (Public Law 96-399) which requires cities joining in the urban county
entitlement to make a 3-year commitment.
(3) Effective October 1 , 1981 , any unit of general local government which is not
included in the urban entitlement for the first year is not eligible for in-
clusion in the second or third years.
(4) By joining the urban county, you will not be eligible for a grant under Section
106 (Small Cities) unless the County's application is disapproved or withdrawn
prior to or during the three year period.
-continued-
an equal opportunitt• emplo.ver
Letter to City of Tigard
Page 2
7/6/81
Although we encountered some difficulties as a direct consequence of the limited
amount of predevelopment time that was available to us in the early stages of the
grant, I 'm sure you' ll agree that since then we certainly have come a long way
together. We would like to see that cooperative spirit maintained and look forward
to your city's continued participation in the Block Grant program.
If you have any questions about the new cooperation agreements, please have a member
of your staff contact my office for further information.
My very best wishes ,
Sincerely,
.&" 11��
H. J. March
Program Manager
Encl .
HJM/ac
17
AGREEMENT FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION
This Agreement is hereby entered into between Washington
County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, and the
City of Tigard_ , a municipal corporation of the State
of Oregon within Washington County, for the purpose of providing
for the commitment between units of general purpose government
for the undertaking, or assistance and undertaking, of essential
community development housing assistance activities pursuant to
the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as follows :
WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has enacted the
Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and the Department
of Housing and Urban Development has adopted regulations pursuant
thereto (herinafter jointly referred to as the "Act") ; and
WHEREAS, Congress has found and declared that the Nation 's
cities, towns and small urban communities face critical social ,
economic and environmental problems; and
WHEREAS, the Congress has further found and declared that
the future welfare of the Nation and the well-being of its citi-
zens depend on the establishment and maintenance of viable urban
communities, large and small, as social , economic and political
entities ; and 1.
WHEREAS, the primary objective of said Act is the development
of viable urban communities , by providing decent housing and a
suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities;
and
WHEREAS, consistent with this primary objective, the Federal
assistance provided in this Act is for the support of community
development activities which are directed toward the following
specific objectives :
- 2 -
The
2 -The elimination of slums, blight and the prevention of
blighting influences and the deterioration of property and neigh-
borhood and community facilities of importance to the welfare of
the community;
(2) The elimination of conditions which are detrimental to
health, safety, and public welfare, through code enforcement , demo-
lition, interim rehabilitation assistance, and related activities;
(3) The conservation and expansion of the Nation's housing
stock in order to provide a decent home and a suitable living en-
vironment for all persons;
(4) The expansion and improvement of the quantity and quality
Of community services, principally for persons of low and moderate
income, which are essential for sound community development and
for the development of viable urban communities;
(5) A more rational utilizn.t;n„ cf jar-,
--- - _ 1c411U mllu other natural
resources and the better arrangement of residential, commercial,
industrial , recreational , and other needed activity centers;
(6) The reduction of the isolation of income groups within
communities and geographical areas and the promotion of an in-
crease in the diversity and vitality of neighborhoods through the
spatial deconcentration of housing opportunities for
Persons of
lower income and the revitalization of deteriorating or deterior-
ated neighborhoods to attract persons of higher income; and
(7) The restoration and preservation of properties of
special value for historic, architectural, or aesthetic reasons;
and
WHEREAS, it is found that certain of these objectives are
{ pertinent to the concerns and needs of Washington County and its
l_
M111 ON
communities; and
WHEREAS, Title I of said Act provides that urban counties
may, under some circumstances, receive entitlement for community
development funds in the same manner as larger cities; and
WHEREAS, one of the criteria for urban county eligibility is
a county population of at least 200,000, not including urban
cities; and
WHEREAS, Washington County desires to count the population
of the City of —Ti .....] in order to reach the necessary
200 ,000 minimum population; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development
has specified the minimum provisions which must be included with-
in any interlocal agreement into which local governments enter
to qualify for urban county eligibility;
NOW, THEREF0ary, tJI" �T n.ELIVLVL'SJ that the City Of Tigard
authorizes the inclusion of its population for purposes of qual-
ification of Washington County under the urban county designation
of the Act ; and joins together with other units of general purpose
local government to qualify Washington County as an urban county
for Housing and Community Development Act block grant funds and
agrees to cooperate in undertaking, or assist in undertaking essen-
tial community development and housing assistance activities,
specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing, subject
to the following:
(1) That Washington County, as the applicant , assumes full
responsibility, including final decision-making, and also assumes
all obligations of the applicant as specified in the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974 and the regulations thereunder.
4 -
(2) That for the purposes of developing annual Housing and
Community Development Plans and Programs as required by Title I
of the Act , a policy board is hereby established which shall guide
the plan and program development , make recommendations to the
County upon the criteria to be utilized in selecting eligible
Housing and Community Development Act activities within Washington
County and recommend to the County the program priorities.
(3) That said policy board shall be composed of one repre-
sentative or a designated alternate from each unit of general pur-
pose government executing these interlocal agreements. Each such
representative shall have one vote on said board.
(4) That said policy board shall adopt bylaws, study, review,
hold public hearings, supervise the public review and information
pron-esc , and recnmmanA- +�_ Wachinotnn County on all matters related
to the Housing and Community Development Act application.
(5) That following public hearing, the policy board shall
make final recommendation on the Housing and Community Development
plan and program and housing assistance plan which may be accepted
by Washington County at public meeting and submitted to the Depart-
ment of Housing and Urban Development as the Washington County
application; provided that , should all or part of the recommend
plan not be considered acceptable to the County, the Board of County
Commissioners shall hold at least one (1) public hearing on the
plan and program prior to rejection or amendment of the recommended
plan.
(6) That projects may be implemented and funds expended in
accordance with subgrant agreements between the County and other
Jurisdictions signatory to this agreement . Therefore, said policy
17
5 -
board may establish any legal method for priority and funding
designation so long as such method conforms to the requirements
of the Act.
(7) The term of this Agreement shall be the three program
years commencing July 1, 1982 through and including June 30, 1985 ,
PROVIDED, however, that either party hereto may elect to rescind
this agreement by giving written notice of intention to rescind
prior to the date specified by HUD in any year. Such unilateral
rescission shall become effective for the program year commencing
in the fiscal year following said notice except for the purpose
of managing funds for prior program years. The City of Tigard
understands that such an election to rescind made by City during
the term of this Agreement will cause the City to become ineligible
as a separate entity for a grant under Section 106 of the Housing
and Community development Act of 1974 (The Small Cities Program)
unless Washington County' s application is disapproved or withdrawn.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed
this Agreement this day of 19
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CITY OF Tigard
FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON
By:
Title:
Chairman
-
I hereby find that this Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement is
in accordance with State and local law.
i,- o ty ounsel for
W hington County, Oregon
(REV-2 , 6/1/81)
AGREEMENT FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION
This Agreement is hereby entered into between Washington
County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, and the
City of 'r;srar.i a municipal corporation of the State
of Oregon within Washington County, for the purpose of providing
for the commitment between units of general purpose government
for the undertaking, or assistance and undertaking, of essential
community development housing assistance activities pursuant to
the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as follows:
WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has enacted the
Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and the Department
of Housing and Urban Development has adopted regulations pursuant
thereto (herinafterjointly referred to as the "Act") ; and
WHEREAS, Congress has found and declared that the Nation 's
cities, towns and small urban face critical social,
economic and environmental problems; and
WHEREAS, the Congress has further found and declared that
the future welfare of the Nation and the well-being of its citi-
zens depend on the establishment and maintenance of viable urban
communities, large and small, as social, economic and political
entities; and .
WHEREAS, the primary objective of said Act is the development
of viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and a
suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities;
and
WHEREAS, consistent with this primary objective, the Federal
assistance provided in this Act is for the support of community
l development activities which are directed toward the following
specific objectives:
i
MEN
- G -
(1) The elimination of slums, blight and the prevention of
blighting influences and the deterioration of property and neigh-
borhood and community facilities of importance to the welfare of
the community;
(2) The elimination of conditions which are detrimental to
health, safety, and public welfare, through code enforcement , demo-
lition, interim rehabilitation assistance, and related activities;
(S) The conservation and expansion of the Nation' s housing
stock in order to provide a decent home and a suitable living en-
vironment for all persons;
(4) The expansion and improvement of the quantity and quality
of community services, principally for persons of low and moderate
income, which are essential for sound community development and
for the development of viable urban communities ;
(5) A more rational utilization of land and other natural
resources and the better arrangement of residential, commercial,
industrial , recreational , and other needed activity centers ;
(6) The reduction of the isolation of income groups within
communities and geographical areas and the promotion of an in-
crease in the diversity and vitality of neighborhoods through the
spatial deconcentration of housing Opportunities for persons of
lower income and the revitalization of deteriorating or deterior-
ated neighborhoods to attract persons of higher income; and
(?) The restoration and preservation of properties of
special value for historic, architectural , or aesthetic reasons;
and
WHEREAS, it is found that certain of these objectives are
r pertinent to the concerns and needs of Washington County and its
MOMMOM
J -
Room
communities; and
WHEREAS, Title I of said Act provides that urban counties
may, under some circumstances, receive entitlement for community
development funds in the same manner as larger cities; and
WHEREAS, one of the criteria for urban county eligibility is
a county population of at least 200 ,000, not including urban
cities; and
WHEREAS, Washington County desires to count the population
of the City of Tigard in order to reach the necessary
200,000 minimum population; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development
has specified the minimum provisions which must be included with-
in any interlocal agreement into which local governments enter
to qualify for urban county eligibility;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Tigard
authorizes the inclusion of its population for purposes of qual-
ification of Washington County under the urban county designation
of the Act ; and joins together with other units of general purr.,,,,se
local government to qualify Washington County as an urban county
for Housing and Community Development Act block grant funds and
agrees to cooperate in undertaking, or assist in undertaking essen-
tial community development and housing assistance activities,
specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing, subject
to the following:
(1) That Washington County, as the applicant , assumes full
responsibility, including final decision-making, and also assumes
all obligations of the applicant as specified in the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974 and the regulations thereunder.
4 -
(2) That for the purposes of developing annual Housing and
Community Development Plans and Programs as required by Title I
of the Act , a policy board is hereby established which shall guide
the plan and program development , make recommendations to the
County upon the criteria to be utilized in selecting eligible
Housing and Community Development Act activities within Washington
County and recommend to the County the program priorities.
(3) That said policy board shall be composed of one repre-
sentative or a designated alternate from each unit of general pur-
pose government executing these interlocal agreements. Each such
representative shall have one vote on said board.
(4) That said policy board shall adopt bylaws, study, review,
hold public hearings, supervise the public review and information
process, and recommend to Washington County on all matters related
to the Housing and Community Development Act application.
(5) That following public hearing, the policy board shall
make final recommendation on the Housing and Community Development
plan and program and housing assistance plan which may be accepted
by Washington County at public meeting and submitted to the Depart-
ment of Housing and Urban Development as the Washington County
application; provided that , should all or part of the recommend
plan not be considered acceptable to the County, the Board of County
Commissioners shall hold at least one (1) public hearing on the
plan and program prior to rejection or amendment of the recommended
plan.
(6) That projects may be implemented and funds expended in
accordance with subgrant agreements between the County and other
jurisdictions signatory to this agreement . Therefore, said policy
board may establish any legal method for priority and funding
designation so long as such method conforms to the requirements
of the Act.
(7) The term of this Agreement shall be the three program
years commencing July 1, 1982 through and including June 30, 1985 ,
PROVIDED, however, that either party hereto may elect to rescind
this Agreement by giving written notice of intention to rescind
prior to the date specified by HUD in any year. Such unilateral
rescission shall become effective for the program year commencing
in the fiscal year following said notice except for the purpose
of managing funds for prior program years. The City of Tigard
understands that such an election to rescind made by City during
the term of this Agreement will cause the City to become ineligible
as a separate entity for a grant under Section 106 of the Housing
and Community Development Act of 1974 (The Small Cities Program)
unless Washington County' s application is disapproved or withdrawn.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed
this Agreement this day of 19
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CITY OF Tigard
FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON
By:
T_ l
11t1.1C:
Chairman
I hereby find -that this Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement is
in accordance with State and local law.
C-Offni-ty -Counsel for
Vidshington County, Oregon
(REV-2 , 6/1/81)
AGREEMENT FOR INTiER.GOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION
This Agreement is hereby entered into between Washington
County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, and the
City of !r-1 a municipal corporation of the State
of Oregon within Washington County, for the purpose of providing
for the commitment between units of general purpose government
for the undertaking, or assistance and undertaking, of essential
community development housing assistance activities pursuant to
the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as follows:
WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has enacted the
Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and the Department
of Housing and Urban Development has adopted regulations pursuant
thereto (herinafter jointly referred to as the "Act") ; and
WHEREAS, Congress has found and declared that the Nation ' s
cities , towns and small ,Lrr,an corinununities face critical social,
economic and environmental problems; and
WHEREAS, the Congress has further found and declared that
the future welfare of the Nation and the well-being of its citi-
zens depend on the establishment and maintenance of viable urban
communities, large and small, as social, economic and political
entities; and
WHEREAS, the primary objective of said Act is the development
of viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and a
suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities ;
and
WHEREAS, consistent with this primary objective, the Federal
assistance provided in this Act is for the support of community
development activities which are directed toward the following
specific objectives :
- 2 -
(1) The elimination of slums, blight and the prevention of
blighting influences and the deterioration of property and neigh-
borhood and community facilities of importance to the welfare of
the community;
(2) The elimination of conditions which are detrimental to
health, safety, and public welfare, through code enforcement , demo-
lition, interim rehabilitation assistance, and related activities;
(3) The conservation and expansion of the Nation's housing
stock in order to provide a decent home and a suitable living en-
vironment for all persons;
(4) The expansion and improvement of the quantity and quality
of community services, principally for persons of low and moderate
income, which are essential for sound community development and
for the development of viable urban communities;
(5) ix more rational utilization of
land and other natural
resources and the better arrangement of residential , commercial ,
industrial, recreational, and other needed activity centers;
(6) The reduction of the isolation of income groups within
communities and geographical areas and the promotion of an in-
crease in the diversity and vitality of neighborhoods through the
spatial deconcentration of housing opportuni.ties for persons of
lower income and the revitalization of deteriorating or deterior-
ated neighborhoods to attract persons of higher income; and
(7) The restoration and preservation of properties of
special value for historic, architectural, or aesthetic reasons;
and
WHEREAS , it is found that certain of these objectives are
pertinent to the concerns and needs of Washington County and its
3 -
communities;
-communities; and
WHEREAS, Title Z of said Act provides that urban counties
may, under some circumstances, receive entitlement for community
development funds in the same manner as larger cities ; and
WHEREAS , one of the criteria for urban county eligibility is
a county population of at least 200 ,000 , not including urban
cities; and
WHEREAS, Washington County desires to count the population
of the City of TJ gairrl in order to reach the necessary
200,000 minimum population; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development
has specified the minimum provisions which must be included with-
in any interlocal agreement into which local governments enter
to qualify for urban county eligibility;
- r% 7T+IIZ+DL`ti,(1DT: Rte' TT RF.C(lT,tj}r'.T1 thM,t +ho (`i+ci of Ti_ard
AM rr , 11yLlL'A 1'ORE, ...i "J
authorizes the inclusion of its population for purposes of qual-
ification of Washington County under the urban county designation
of the Act ; and joins together with other units of general purpose
local government to qualify Washington County as an urban county
for Housing and Community Development Act block grant funds and
agrees t0der
cvvper ate in undertaking, Or aSS1St 1n undertaking essen-
tial community development and housing assistance activities,
specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing, subject
to the following:
(1) That Washington County, as the applicant , assumes full
responsibility, including final decision-making, and also assumes
all obligations of the applicant as specified in the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974 and the regulations thereunder.
mom
4 -
(2) That for the purposes of developing annual Housing and
?, Community Development Plans and Programs as required by Title I
of the Act , a policy board is hereby established which shall guide
the plan and program development , make recommendations to the
County upon the criteria to be utilized in selecting eligible
Housing and Community Development Act activities within Washington
County and recommend to the County the program priorities.
(3) That said policy board shall be composed of one repre-
sentative or a designated alternate from each unit of general pur-
pose government executing these interlocal agreements. Each such
representative shall have one vote on said board.
(4) That said policy board shall adopt bylaws, study, review,
hold public hearings, supervise the public review and information
process, and recommend to Washington County on all matters related
to the Housing and Community Development Act application.
(5) That following public hearing, the policy board shall
make final recommendation on the Housing and Community Development
plan and program and housing assistance plan which may be accepted
by Washington County at public meeting and submitted to the Depart-
ment of Housing and Urban Development as the Washington County
application; provided that , should all or part of the recommend
Plan not be considered acceptable to the County, the Board of County
Commissioners shall hold at least one (1) public hearing on the
plan and program prior to rejection or amendment of the recommended
plan.
(6) That projects may be implemented and funds expended in
accordance with subgrant agreements between the County and other
�� jurisdictions signatory to this agreement . Therefore, said policy
17�
board may establish any legal method for priority and funding
designation so long as such method conforms to the requirements
of the Act.
(7) The term of this Agreement shall be the tiree program
years commencing July 1, 1982 through and including June 30, 1985,
PROVIDED, however, that either party hereto may elect to rescind
this Agreement by giving written notice of intention to rescind
prior to the date specified by HUD in any year. Such unilateral
rescission shall become effective for the program year commencing
in the fiscal year following said notice except for the purpose
of managing funds for prior program years. The City of Tigard
understands that such an election to rescind made by City during
the term of this Agreement will cause the City to become ineligible
as a separate entity for a grant under Section 106 of the Housing
and Community Development Act of 1974 (The Small Cities Program)
unless Washington County's application is disapproved or withdrawn.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed
this Agreement this day of 19
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CITY OF Tigard
FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON
By:
Title:
Chairman
I hereby find that this Intergovernmental Cooperation Agreement is
in accordance with State and local law.
my Counsel far
shington County, Oregon
(REV-2 , 6/1/81)
June 30, 19 81
�L
_ 1981
Mayor Wilbur Bishop
and Tigard City Council
12420 S. W. Main
Tigard, Oregon
Dear Gentlemen:
This will be just a brief note to thank you for the opportunity
to appear before you at your Council meeting last Monday.
It was helpful to me to hear your concerns firsthand. I can
promise you that we will make some further efforts to for
� restore
l.Vl C
the Zoo ' s credibility with the Metro voters who have so
generously supported us in the past.
The suggestion for a family rate is an excellent one. Perhaps
we can hold several free County Appreciation Days to pay special
attention to those whose taxes make our capital improvements
and operations possibla. We would welcome any additional ideas
that you might have.
And most of all, I appreciate your writing to us and taking
the time to have me to your meeting.
S ncer ly o s ,
arren ff
Directo
TATJ I:j ah
CC: Jack Deines
Craig Berkman
Rick Gustafson
Marilyn Holstrum
A SERVICE OF THE METROPOLITAN SERVICE DISTRICT
T 600
I �
T/CARD SEN/OR CZ-N7ER
i
- - - /29. S6
e
14700*
72- 604
er
�SeC0NOA.PY) \ S. 641611/
66
CH4M6ERLA/N BA' 648, 3S/ 021 Z, Nd. 2985
T �• l- 2 T*4N=N0e$
_ N. 8 9 29' 49" Al/. 279. /3 _
$ fu.S•� fo, 1`K' N. 54'33
p
T<. 602 r. 60,3 T. 60 /
i
I I I I
s, w. OivyA ,TA sr ti
BASIS OF 6,E,4.fl Gs : couiYTY SECT/oit/ IV.4FORTLUND CEHERAL ELECTRIC CO.
POnTLAND, OREGON
TO ACCoMP"y PpWE.PL/NE EASE�sfENT
CIVA MBERZA lAl PRaP
q` 2, T2_SR/H/ iYM.`/AS/f1NGTC.y'C:J
iti SC•tE ���= 6D __ _O.fE5- 8/_
DR.AMn of TR.C(O O• tMfc.fO _
Z.
•P�►OVfA .O
DRG. No.E- 6169
ammi low=,
c�.
NE 1/4 SW 1i4 SECTION
P-
- at+»J J►IrT/'1A1 (`r111R1
Y°/J��7rJIJVV 9 VI• VVv �
SCALE LJJ=
d
MIY.mw COR LO-
SEE - MAP SEE MAP
2S 12CB 2S 1 -2 BD
.o
- W io.ea, s g 13
2 t t
o
1 / 190 ia, •jJSJ' 'moo
ro .67Ac. 10
Y-
J_ �
TICARD COMMUNITY e6
WETHODIST CHURCH .1 9
'S90
�0
Rt
BMW .\ mak- ��RQ� • r .0
100 e
49 Ac. o,� q0- 7 �3$
�F �� m
E1
- es 2F SO 208 Q�
102 6 q,
w 37 Ac_ �:'L°
Q1."
301 �� �• 202 - 5
./6Ac. � / 34Ac-
oo��
0 300 400 4
r 44Ac. /.46Ac.
.0 245 fa-
mJ F
O � `
201 ;.:.
-16Ac t 706
S� 500 0 0 0 ;t2Ac
.BSAc. \� /� '
1>1
Z Department of Transportation
CITY p;' ••;..;RD
9 y=<aj9 METROPOLITAN BRANCH
VICTOR
_E 9ATIYEH 5821 N.E. GLISAN, PORTLAND, OREGON 97213
Q GCV4(F
L July 2, 1981
In Raply Refer to
File No.
FRANK CURRIE, Director of Public Works 34-1968
City of Tigard 34-1039
P.O. Box 23397
Tigard, OR 97223
Subject: PROPOSED AGREEMENT
Project Name: N. Tigard-Beef Bend Rd. (Pacific Hwy. West)
Funding: Interstate Transfer
City: Tigard
Attached are three bound copies and one unbound information copy
of a proposed agreement covering power consumption fnr the signals
on Hiq`..jay 99W between the N. Tigard interchanqp and Reef Rends
Road.
Would you please review this with your staff and with other affected
City personnel and if it is satisfactory, arrange for an ordinance
+"`.'ruin•, ex-ecutinn by the proper City officials.
11Mor resolution LLU{ IIVI 1 y — r• -r
The bound, signed copies should be returned to me at this office
along with a copy of the authorizing document. You may retain the
information copy. Following final action by the Highway Division,
you will be sent a fully executed copy for your records.
Remarks:
This supplements the earlier agreement for the Tigard TSM project.
If you have any questions, please call .
(Z!�'ROSE
Federal Aid Specialist
JR/po
Attachments (4 copies, Agreement)
cc: Region 1
f
Depalt177arrt of Transportation
HIGHWAY DIVISION
vicrow AnveM TRANSPORTATION BUILDING, SALEM, OREGON 97310
Approved: L. E. George
MCH:pf
6/18/81 In Reply Refer to
File No.:
Misc. Contracts & Agreements
No. 6396
City of Tigard
P.O. Box 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97233
Gentlemen:
The Oregon State Highway Division (State) and the City of Tigard
(City) entered into a Construction-Finance Agreement, dated May 25,
1979, concerning traffic signal system improvements for the North
Tigard Interchange-Beef Bend Road Section of the Pacific Highway West
(project).
tu,.e -and „. , ,,,,Y e ..;,w del,Ct,lti ned that the aforementioned agree-
ment, although remaining in full force and effect, should be supple-
mented by this agreement in the manner hereinafter set forth in order
to more clearly define City responsibilities related to electrical
energy required for operation of the traffic signals. Any further
reference to the agreement of May 25, 1979 shall include the following
stipulations.
City shall , upon completion of the project, accept all responsibility
for, and pay all costs of, electrical energy consumed in operation of the
traffic signals on the Pacific Highway West at the following locations
vuiy:
S.W. 69th Avenue
S.W. Pfaffle Street
S.W. Greenburg Road
S.W. Johnson Street
S.W. Walnut Street
S.W. Garrett Street
S.W. Park Si � et
S.W. McDonal,l street
S.W. Buil Mountain Road
S.W. Durham Road
State and City mutually agree and understand that the agreement of
May 25, 1979 shall remain in full force and effect and apply with like
force and effect, except as expressly modified by this agreement.
734-3372
•
City of Tigard
June 10, 1981
Paye 2
IN WITNESS 1,4HEP.EOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and
affixed their seals as of the day and year hereinafter written. City
has acted in this matter pursuant to Resolution No. ,
adopted by its City Council on the - day of _11981 .
This project was approved by the Oregon Transportation Commission
on April 17, 1979, at which time the State Highway Engineer was autho-
rized and directed to sign the necessary agreements for and on behalf
of the Commission. Said authority is set forth in the Minutes of the
Oregon Transportation Commission.
APPROVAL RECOMIN ENDED STATE OF OREGON, by and through
its Department of Transportation,
Highway Division
Region Engineer
State Hi ghv.lay Engineer
Da to
i iT'� OF TIGARD her and thr..,
itsy Officials
By
Ma vor
�y
City Recorder
3
Nil 1,111
i
-
d.•7 {i
Tigard ntn "
AW > i WashingtonJune 30, 1931ej
� C,
N—b•r 51 51 i Ne —4
No.of Pr•c;nd a YES itJ I i > m
30 ��3� O
31 ?T I 0 p
32 I n
33 p O Z
34 / I 3�cr I I CCA
,>w3 �
Absentee
I
{ — nQ1 I i I •3
0 TV
a�N
.o;
0
I A
3
a
t CU r!Lt,•�,,, o d
A N
J L;S
TOTAL - 6
3Z3
I certify that the vofos recorded on this abstract cor- Signature of Couafy Clerk: !
rectly summarize the fatly of votes cast et the election Grego S. Hathaway Date of Abstract
indicated. —7—
ABSTRACT OF VOTES AT GENERAL AND I ABSTRA
SPECIAL ELECTIONS: 001YOTES AT PRIMARY ELECTIONS: F
fl
Separate sheets for Democratic, Republican, Nonpartisan, and other
Votes cast for Governor must be on separate candidates.
page or pages. Separate sheets for candidates for City. County (includingarid Sate office. Precinct)
For additional instructions sea ORS 250.810. For additional instructions,sea ORS 249.410.
�.USS ......
OREGON DIVISION
��' , � ,� .: ` , U KITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION
_. of the UNITED STATES or AMERICA
1937 UN Day Committee
2887 74th Ave_ SE, Salem, Oregon 973021
NATIONAL PRESIDENT: (503) 581-1732
R_cert fd. Ratner June 5, 1981
HONORARY CHAIRMEN:
A,!`ur J. Goldberg
Henry Cabot Lodge
Charas W. Yost
NATIONAL CHAIRMAN, Mayor Wilbur A. Bishop
UN DAY, 1981 10590 SW Cook Lane
Charles L_ Brown, Tigard, OR 97223
Chairman. AT R T
;er a;Puintmq.tt oI P. d..t Reayanr
Dear Mayor Bishop:
OREGON DIVISION Each year, the United Nations Association of the United States of
America seeks to encourage Americans as a people to focus
attention on special concerns of the world family of nations
through observance of United Nations Day.
In 1981, the United Nations worldwide theme is "The International
Year of Disabled Persons". Oregon is joining other states in the
President: sponsorship of many activities which relate to this theme,
Professor Gordon Gilkey including contacts with disabled persons and organizations.
Governor's Honorary As Governor Atiyeh's Honorary Chairman, I am inviting you to
cay Chair..aa: appoint a chairperson for your community. The enclosed carni
Eric A. Howard contains information that should be helpful to you in identifying
UN Day Co-Chairman for SUCK a p
••IYDP'• person. It will be referable if you can select someone
Jack Sumner who will be abiz to attend one of three listed training sessions,
UN Day Co-Chairman for as we are making a concerted effort in 1981 to provide leadership,
Public Relations training, and support to your appointee.
Rolf D.Glerum
OFFICERS: While the United Nations, like: all hwran institutions, is an
Dr.Gordon Gilkey.President imperfect instrument, it does play a vital role in the affairs of
Enc A.Howard,vice President
Alberta Jonnson.Secretary
significant nations and continues to enjoy support among Americans
Ggbrge Abendschsin.Treasurer
Frank A.Bauman.Past President in general and the people of Oregon in particular. This year's
Ross Calley.E><ecutive Director
90ARO OF DIRECTORS: theme is one on which all people can readily unite.
Mary E.Abbott
George At?naschein
Arnidg "11 After you have selected a United Nations Day chairperson for your
Arnold 4ro;ker
Thomas Cn.rcn,ll community, I will greatly appreciate your returning to me the
Wal`_,our!v„
Eric
;.4,ward enclosed card with his or her name address and telephone number.
Leonard N•�ntmg
Dorotry Keene
Grotcnert Kvkey
Ju"yIassweil Thank you for your consideration of this request-
Jam-s MCNIath
Thelma Mfils
Robe`;Moody
Woody Naylor Sincerely,
Wesley N.Cholson
Cl, Norwood
Atav,Faull
Ja-..se.a d
Pn±Zaor^.P.sc.^.letc�er
Pralasscr Cer:ie shay
Allen Tom
Professor A.F Walter Eric A. Howard
CHAPTER PRe310ENT3
px.ama, Governor's Honorary* IN Day Chairman
G:ar s 9,a•nelf _ e
- MiR W+naneite
lOM(:Onner
Ra,.y,tla Enclosure
1UN4Poln14re1 W.11"
Dan wf.l_ - 1r V
r"irtrya rM= 'fir
A tnaus
International Year of Disabled Persons ate
AGREEMENT FOR LIBRARY SERVICES
This Agreement entered into by and between the City of
Tigard , hereinafter referred to as Contractor,
and Washington County, a political subdivision of the State of
Oregon, hereinafter referred to as County, on behalf of Washington
County Cooperative Library Services (WCCLS) .
WHEREAS, the voters of Washington County have approved a five-
year serial levy for the purpose of providing non-fee access by
County residents to contracting libraries (Washington County Resolu-
tion and Orders dated 3/14/78 - 55 and 56) ; and
WHEREAS, this levy provides revenues to compensate contracting
libraries for the provision of non-fee library services to County
residents; and
WHEREAS, County is authorized to enter into agreements for the
provisions of these services pursuant to ORS 357. 410 and ORS Chapter
190, and Contractor is capable of providing such library services
and is desirous of contracting with County to provide the same;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises con-
tained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
A. CONSIDERATION
As compensation to Contractor for the services to be provided
pursuant to this agreement, County agrees to pay Contractor
$74,510.00 for services rendered pursuant to
this agreement, subject to Section E on termination. Time and manner
of payment shall be consistent with the receipt of tax levy collec-
tions, if Contractor is a municipal corporation. Payments shall be
made monthlyif Contractor is a
private non-profit library.
-2-
B. TERM
The term of this agreement shall be July 1, 1981 through
and including June 30, 1982.
C. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY COUNTY
County agrees to provide the following services for each
Contractor:
1. Daily courier service excluding weekends and holidays.
2. Toll-free calling within Washington County.
3. Reference services at Pacific University Library including
Interlibrary Loan and Union Catalog Maintenance.
4. Shared audio visual equipment.
5. Outreach services to elderly, handicapped and institu-
tionalized through Forest Grove City Library.
6. Books By Mail to all rural route boxholders and any county
` resident by request.
7. Children's services and shared resources.
8. Public relations for Countywide programs with a special
emphasis on Library Week in 1982.
9. Grant writing, planning for fund raising for capital
construction.
10. Coordination and administration of above and with the
Tri-County Region, State and Northwest.
D. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR
Contractor agrees to provide, at a minimum, the following
services:
1. Non-Fee Access.
Contractor shall provide County residents free (non-fee)
access to their normally circulating library materials under estab-
lished circulation policies.
-3-
2. Library Services.
Contractor hereby agrees to expend a minimum of all
County funds in providing library services according to the policies
established by their respective bodies. Library services shall mean
the facility shall provide and be open for public access and public-
usage.
3. Staff.
Contractor shall have one designated paid staff person who
shall have the responsibility for the administration of the library
and its programs.
4 . Record Keeping.
Contractor shall supply County with a copy of the annual
report it makes to the Oregon State Library in accordance with
ORS 357. 52n . r-0-tractor sh,a, , , ,----
a-.so neer, cl l:culatiun records of
resident and non-resident use of its library.
5. Financial Audit.
Each contracting city shall furnish County a copy of its
annual audit. Each contracting community or non-profit library
shall be responsible for obtaining an annual financial audit which
shall be, in form and substance; _t�he equivalent of the annual audit
required of municipal corporations pursuant to ORS Chapter 297.
County shall be furnished a copy of said audit.
6. Public Hearing on Performance.
Contractor shall have a specially publicized annual public
meeting to receive information from its library's patrons concerning
the programs of service the library offers.
7. Library Materials.
Subject to adopted budgetary constraints, Contractor shall
attempt to annually acquire library materials equivalent to 5% of
the number of volumes in their collection at the end of the previous
-4-
fiscal year.
8. Hold Harmless.
Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless County,
its officers, employees, agents and representatives from and
against all claims, demands, penalties and causes of action of any
kind or character, including the cost of defense and attorney fees,
arising in favor of Contractor°s employees or third parties on
account of personal injury, death or damage to property arising
out of services performed, the omission of services or in any way
resulting from the acts or omissions of Contractor and/or its agents,
employees, subcontractors or representatives.
9 . Equal 02portunity.
County Personnel Rule 13.2.4 . provides that County shall
enter into contractual agreements only with Equal Opportunity
Employers. Therefore, Contractor hereby agrees that its employees
(and applicants for employment) shall not be discriminated against
because of race, color, national origin, religion, physical or
mental handicap, sex or age, except in the case of bona fide occu-
pational qualifications as defined and provided by Oregon law.
10 . Compliance With ORS Chapter 279 .
Contractor further agrees that it shall comply fully with
all the applicable provisions of ORS Chapter 279 regarding public
contracts. Said Chapter is hereby incorporated by reference and
its terms shall be binding on Contractor in the same manner as if
it were fully set forth herein.
E. TERMINATION
1. In the event that either party hereto has reasonable cause
to believe that the other party has violated any of the covenants
contained herein, then that party shall make written demand upon
t
-5-
the other party for proof of compliance with the covenant allegedly
violated. The party receiving the demand shall provide such proof
within ten (10) days of such receipt. If no response is timely
made under this section or if the complaining party in good faith
determines that the other party's response to the allegation is not
satisfactory, then the complaining party shall have the right to
terminate this agreement upon sixty (60) days written notice to the
other party.
2. The County shall additionally have the right to terminate
this agreement upon 30 days written notice, if it determines, in good
faith, that the public interest would be served by such termination
and such termination is based upon actual library serial levy
receipts being less than the amount reasonably anticipated by the County.
3. In the event of termination by either party, damages and/or
compensation to either party shall be limited to the following:
a. Contractor shall be entitled to the consideration
stated in this agreement prorated to the date of termination; and
b. County shall be entitled to reimbursement from Con-
tractor of all funds received by Contractor from County which are
not expended in furtherance of this agreement at the date ;,f
termination.
F. CAPTIONS
Captions and headings used in this agreement are for convenience
only and shall not be construed or interpreted so as to enlarge or
diminish the rights or obligations of the parties hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their
hands on the dates indicated below.
L
(Mayor or Board ChairmanT Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
For Washington County, Oregon
Reccrder of Other Officer) Recording Secretary
Date: Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Wssistant County Counsel J
For Washington County. 010-
Wit:
MEM.OR.�NDUM
TO: Council Members // -
FROM: Linda Sargent, Research and Development Aide
` s
RE: Summary of June 25 meeting with Washington Coullnty Community Development
Block Grant Policy Advisory Board
DATE: July 9, 1981
SUMMARY:
The Policy Advisory Board is currently reviewing goals, strategies, and
implementation (Volume I of II) of the Six Year Community Development Plan
(82-88) prepared by Cogan and Associates. The Plan assesses the county's
needs for housing and community development activities for low to moderate
income households as well .as develops goals and objectives to guide the
annual allocation of CDBG funds for projects relating to neighborhood
revitalization, housing, public facilities and economic development.
(See attached for projected allocations.)
IMPACT:
In the Needs Assessment of the Community Development Plan, no extensive
housing rehabilitation or neighborhood revitalization needs have bec n
a identified in Tigard, HM-7c ii cou-m:ercial revitalization. of the core
area, inadequate stories sewers, road resurfacing, curb construction,
and inadequate space for municipal services have been targeted as problem
areas.
Housing and Neighborhood Revitalization of Washington County will tentatively
consume 70% of CDBG funds over the next six years. Since Tigard does
not appear to contain great numbers of low income individuals with critical
housing rehabilitation needs, the city will probably be unable to tap the
allocated funding of this activity. Further, the core area has been
designated a target area in which case the city would be eligible for
projects funds under Neighborhood Revitalization or Economies Development.
The construction of storm sewers and other public works projects in the
city could be facilitated through dollars allocated under Community
Facilities.
The deadline for submitting project proposals for 82-83 to OCD is October
30, 1981 . If I can provide any additional information concerning the
Needs Assessment, the Community Development Plan, or potential projects,
feel free to contact me.
cc: Frank Currie
Attachment
d ;' o
co
A
CJS m N
C4 M
V)-
O
_ — 8 O O S O S O O O
O rr) ONi d ko io m O n � O O
r CP' cr) r c tD m N .4 M t�O
co
?� •moi d----
o dP— O cip
0 --
dp O
Nr r-1 N
Cpp3 p O O O O
O O S CoS S S
S O Co
co C� Q � -4 � A r Ln co VO'
'O v r1 lD cr) r-1 r-i c+) Ln
.`ate vi- COP dp
dP c0
O S S S Co S O S S
_ O O O O O Cl S O O O
d' Vr vi- N O N %S CSD O m d CD
Ln
v � r0-i � � � Ln � ch') l�D
[n ?a+ rn
— dP —"' dP----- d4
M dP
dP C> O N
O-- —O O O O C? O p O
LIZ O S S S O u0) O O
� m � m cn � L 'D o � � cn
a, m M r-1 .-i r i 14 M
1-4
a ---- --------� --
dP
tr ®—
F-' ochp
� o NO
pp �j C) 0 0
c O N p m tn -4 t0
Q N c l/} S cn m ci dt' S � �' Pi
0 f dr c+') r4 Ln Cl) r-1
t6 M
:+ rn I*-
vo 0 o o --
'a r� N
----C) C) C.) C) N O O
N O N O O O O r- to LCT
m t� cam') M M S S � W 10,
"I N r-i 1P) cn r-1 rd .--1 N f7
?� CO3�l
[dP O— p o cri N --
0
' 14Q
-.4 MA
UFD
A WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
VOLUME III Issue 13 July 9 , 1981
STAFF ATTENDS WORKSHOP
Doris Hartig , Finance Director/City Recorder; Irene Ertell , City
Librarian; and Linda Sargent, Research and Development Aide will
be attending a one day workshop on Friday, July 17th addressing
the issue of the Supervisor ' s Authority.
LANDIS SELECTION FOR ENGINEERING POST
Bob Landis, has been selected for the position of Engineering
Technician I effective July 1st . He will be acting as an interim
public works inspector until the new survey crew comes aboard.
Bob was formerly a Utility Worker II and has been with the City
of Tigard since October, 1977 . Congratulations , Bob.
RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION FOR UTILITY WORKER IS UNDERWAY
4-h t;nn �F TT r; l i t'�7 G7prSce
Applications are IJC iag screened t— —
I . Claire Mead is interviewing candidates Jtoyfill one position
in Parks , two positions in Sewers and two positions in Streets .
Applications will be accepted until July 15th.
CURRIE ON VACATION
Acting City Administrator Frank Currie, will be on vacation during
the week of July 13 - 17 . Doris Hartig has been appointed Acting
Interim Administrator during this time .
CHIEF ATTENDS SEMINAR IN ALASKA
Chief Robert Adams will be attending the National FBI Academy
retraining Seminar in Anchorage , Alaska, during July 12 - 15 .
BUILDING DEPARTMENT CHECKS PLANS FOR CONDO DEVELOPMENT
The Building Department in checking plans on Bonita Firs Village ,
a 73 unit condominium development, located north of Bonita Road.
-t. !!%G ., f1 %aP3=qRRD UPDA- Tks;
i
A WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
VOLUV E III ISSUE 12 JULY 2, 1981
BIKEPATH LEVY APPROVED - LIBRARY MEASURE DEFEATED
According to a preliminary unofficial count, the Bike Path measure was approved by
a vote of 647 to 319. The $1.3 million levy to computerize circulation in
Washington County libraries was defeated.
REFUND RECEIVED FROM SAIF
The Accounting Department has been informed that $9,716 will be refunded to the City
from :*ie State Accident Insurance Fund(Workman's Compensation) for injuries not
incurred during 1979-80. Department Heads and Supervisors, particularly, Claire Mead
in Public Works and Chief Adams, deserve commendation for promoting a safer work
environment and thus keeping on the job injuries to a minimum.
CITY HALL, LIBRARY CLOSES
City Hall will be closed Friday, July 3 in observance of the July 4th holiday. The
City Library will close July 3 and will reopen to the public July 7th.
STAFF ATTENDS CDBG WORKSHOP
Frank Currie, Acting City Administrator; Doris Hartig, Finance Director/City Recorder;
Mary Strickland, Senior Accountant; and Linda Sargent, Research & Development Aide,
attended a workshop sponsored by Washington County Office of Community Development
June 30th on Grantee Performance Reports . The City is required to submit performance
reports by July 21 on projects funded during the last fiscal year.
INTERN JOINS PLANNING STAFF
Syed Hamid Pishraie will be working in the Planning Department during July and August
on a volunteer basis. Hamid recently completed a Master's Degree in Urban Planning
from Portland State University and will be assisting the Planning Department in processing
annexations. Welcome, Hamid,
SUMMER HELP CONES ABOARD
Mary Beth Held, a Tigard High School student, will be working in the Planning and
Administration Departments as a clerical aide during the summer. Mary Beth is
participating in a CETA Youth Summer Program in which students receive vocational
evaluation, and are placed in a work experience in both the public and private sector.
CETA picks up wages and insurance for the participants.
t