City Council Packet - 06/09/1980 1
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 9, 1980, 7:30 P.M.
F014LER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
LECTURE ROOM
NOTICE: ALL PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM MUST SIGN
THEIR NAME ON THE APPROPRIATE SIGN-UP SHEET(S) LOCATED AT
THE BACK OF THE ROOM. PERSONS DESIRING TO SPEAK WILL THEN BE
CALLED FORWARD BY THE CHAIR TO SPEAK ON THE INDICATED ITEM(S).
AGENDA:
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. CALL TO AUDIENCE FOR THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS.
5. CONSENT AGENDA: (All matters under this heading are considered to be routine
by the City Council and will be enacted in one motion in the form
list below. There will be no separate discussion of these items.
If discussion is desired by any Council member or member of the
audience, that item will be removed from the consent agenda and
will be considered separately.)
(a) Approval of Minutes: May 19, &June 2, 1980
(b) Approval of Expenditures and Investments: $140,512.86
(c) Ratify Council Action of June 2, 1980
Approval of Boundary Review Commission contribution - $439.50
Approval of Washington County Housing Authority CooperativeAgreement
(d) Street Improvement Consent Covenants - Approve and Authorize Recording
Jolivette, 12790 SW. Walnut Street - MLP 12--79
Robert Randall Phase II Warehouse - 8900 SW Burnham Street - SDR 52-79
(e) Accept and Authorise Signatures
Progress Bible Church, SW 103th Avenue Sanitary Sewer Extension
Sanitary Sewer Compliance,Agreement & Cash Bond Escrow Agreement
6. RESOLUTION No. 80-43 A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING APPRECIATION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD
TO GEORGE` VATERNICK FOR PUBLIC SERVICE AS A MEMBER OF THE
TIGARD LIBRARY BOARD.
(a) Recommendation of City Adminis'trator'.
7. ORDINANCE No 80-- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2.12 SECTIONS 2.12.010 AND
2.12.050, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARK
AND RECREATION BOARD, FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING
AN EMERGENCY.
(a) Recommendation of Director of Public Works.
t
a
8. RESOLUTION No. 80- DECLARING AN INTENTION TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN SANITARY SEWER
IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN AN AREA DETERMINED TO BE A SEWER IMPROVEMENT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FOR
S.W. 74TH AVENUE; DESCRIBING THE PROBABLE TOTAL COST THEREOF;
DEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED AND
ASSESSED, APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SP:CIFICATIONS FOR THE
WORK AND ESTIMATES OF THE CITY'S ENGINEER, AND SETTING PUBLIC
HEARING AND DIRECTING THE GIVING OF NOTICE THEREOF.
(a) Recommendation of Director of Fublic Works.
9. RESOLUTION No. 80- A RESOLUTION CREATING AN ORGANIZATION KNOWN AS THE DOWNTOWN
TIGARD COMMITTEE, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
(a) Recommendation of Planning Director.
10. RESOLUTION No. 80- A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL REPEALING RESOLUTION
No. 80-08, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED
WITHIN YE-OLDE-WINDMILL SUBDIVISION, SUBJECT TO HEREIN
SPECIFIED CONDITIONS.
(a) Recommendation of Director of Public Works.
11. TEMPORARY USE EXTENSION REQUEST - LA14B WESTON (h months)
(a) Recommendation of City Administrator.
8;00 P.M. PUBLIC NOTICE HEARINGS
12. MORNING HILL SUBDIVISION SIDE. LOT EASEMENT VACATION REQUEST.(PUBLIC HEARING)
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Summary by Director of Fublic Works
(c) 'Public Testimony
Proponents
Opponents
Cross Examination
(d) Recommendation of Director of Public Works
(e) Public Hearing Closed
(f) Consideration by Council
(g) ORDINANCE No. 80 A11 ORDINANCE VACATING A TRACT OF LAND IN MORNING HILL ;
SUBDIVISION, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHNIGTON COUNTY, OREGON,
RECORDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
13. ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION'- ZCA 15-80 (Hillview/104th Avenue)
NPO #1:
PUBLIC NOTICE HEARING
An ordinance adopting findings with respect to an amendment to the 1970 zoning map
of the City of Tigard to conform with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan,as adopted
and fixing',an effective date for Tax Map 2S1 `2CC, Tax Lots 2800, 2900, 3000, 3200,
3400, & 3500, Hillview/104th'Avenue annexation, BRC #1543, changing from Washington
County RU-4 to City of;Tigard R-7 "Urban Low Density Residential".
t` (a) Summation by Planning Director
(b) Consideration by Council
(c) ORDINANCE No. 80 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO
AMENDMENT TO THE 1970 ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TIGARR
D TO
CONFORM WITH THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS ADOPTED AND
FIXING AN EFFECTIVE. DATE, (Hillview/104th - Annexation)
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL AGENDA —JUNE 9, 1980
I
14. CONDITIONAL USE CU 4-80 (The Robert Randall Company) NPO #1
APPEAL PUBLIC. HEARING
The Planning Commission denial of a request by Thomas J. Edmonds for a Conditional
Use in an 14-4 "Industrial Park11 zone for RV outside storage as allowed in the
Tigard Municipal Code Section 18.52.020. Also requesting use of floodplain area
for RV storage located at 8900 SW Burnham (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2DB, Tax Lot 200 and
Tax Map 2S1 2AD, Tax Lot 2200), which decision has been appealed to the City Council.
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Summary by Planning Director
(c) Public Testimony (limited to summation of previous statements)
Proponents
Opponents
Cross Examination
- (d) Recommendation or Planning Director
(e) Public Hearing Closed
(f) Consideration of Council
15. ORDINANCE No. 80-� AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CONDITION #2 OF ORDINANCE No. 80-44 DUE TO
A TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Joseph
M. VanLom Park Place Condominiums).
(a) Recommendation of Planning Director.
16. ORDINANCE No. 80-� AN ORDINANCE INSERTING A DELETED SENTENCE, DUE TO TYPOGRAPHICAL
ERROR, IN CHAPTER 18.57,010 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
SENSITIVE LANDS DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
(a) Recommendation of Planning Director.
17. RATIFY NPO #4 MEMBERSHIP APPOINTMENT - JoAnne Nordling rm
(a) Recommendation of Planning Director.
18. REPORT OF BID OPENING FOR RECONDITIONING OF EXISTING STREETS - AWARDING OF BID
(a) Recommendation of Director of Public Works.
19. BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS
(a) Recommendation of Selection Committee.
20. OTHER
21. ADJOURNMENT
k.
d-
PAGE 3 - COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 9, 1980 `
5
T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 9, 1980 - 7:30 P.M.
Councilman John Cook,
1. ROLL CALL:
• heckla;lan Miilwomanckelson;NancieStimleom Brian,
Chief Police,
Kenneth
Robert Adams; Legal Counsel, Joe Bailey; City Administrator,
Raeldon R. Barker; Public Works Director, Frank Currie; City
Recorder/Finance Director, Doris Hartig; Planning Director, Aldie
Howard; Administrative Secretary, Loreen Wilson.
2. CALL TO AUDIENCE FOR THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS.
(a) No one appeared to speak. -
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 19 and June 2,
1980
(a) City Recorder requested Council amend May 19th minutes Item No. 17 tola v
read "approved by 3 to majority vote
Item ofcoLcorrecting ctheatime Coluncilot-
ing Nay" and the June 2
men Brian and Scheckla arrived to 7:34 P.M. and 7:35 P.M. respectively.
(b) Motion by Councilman Brian, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to approve
minutes as amended.
4, APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES AND INVEST14ENTS: $140,x.
(a) Motion by Councilman Brian, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
5. RATIFY COUNCIL ACTION OF JUNE 2, 1980
Approval of Boundary Review Commission Contribution - $439.50
Approval of Washington County Housing Authority Cooperative Agreement
(a) Motion by Councilman Brian, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to ratify action.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
6. STREET IMPROVEMENT CONSENT COVENANTS - Approve and Authorize Recording
Jolivette, 12790 S.W. Walnut Street - MLP 12-79
Robert Randall Phase II Warehouse - 8900` S.W. Burnham Street - SDR 52=79
Motion by Councilman Brian, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to approve and
authorize recording of documents.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
r
7• ACCEPT AND AUTHORIZE SIGNATURES
progress Bible Church, S.W. 130th Avenue Sanitary Sewer Extension -
Sanitary Sewer Compliance Agreement & Cash Bond Escrow Agreement
(a) Motion by Councilman Brian, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to accept and
authorize Mayor and City Recorder to sign.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
OF
E CITY
g• RESOLUTION No. 80-43 A RESOLUTION EXPICKSING PUBLICISEAP RVICE ASHFA MEMBEROF
TO GEORGE IATh FOR
TIGARD LIBRARY BOARD.
(a) City Administrator recommended approval and reported that Mr. Vaternick
was unable to attend Council meeting to accept the resolution.
p
(b) Motion by Councilwoman Stimler, seconded by Councilman Cook to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
AND
ONS
9• ORDINANCE No. 80-45 AN ORDINAIdI�DING TIGARD MUNICIPALCHAPTER 2CODE,IRELATING•TTOOPA KRB
AME
2.12.050,
OF THE
AND RECREATION BOARD, FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECL
ING AN EMERGENCY.
(a) Director of Public Works recommended approval.
}
(b) Motion by Councilwoman Stimler, seconded by Counci.lman Cook to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
SEWER
ANITARY
10. RESOLUTION No. 80-44 DECLARING AN WTTHINIAPI AREA TO ODETER14INEDNSTRUCT RTOIBESA SEWER IMPROVE-
IMPROVEMENTS
MENT ASSESS14ENT DISTRICT,TO BE KNIOWN AS SEWER IMPROVEMENT
DESCRIINDISTRICT FOR S.W. 74TH UE; -RIESBOFGTHEE
COST THEREOF; ll STTRICT TOOBE
£
DEFINING THE
BENEFITED AND ASSESSED; APPROVING ANDADOPTING PLANS AND
`
A
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WORK AND` RINGESTIMATES
AND
CITY'S
'
ENGINEER, AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING OF THE DIRECTING THE GIV-
ING OF NOTICE THEREOF.
ost
ld be about
a (a)
Director of Public Works stated the estimateedetotpngineer4.o�He also recom-
$50,600 and that J. M. Montgomery is tl' p_ public hearing for
mended approval of the resolution which sets the p
June 23, 1980.
(b) Motion,by Councilwoman Stimler, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to adopt. 4
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
i
r �
PAGE 2 - REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - June 9, 1.980
.E
,
4
11. RESOLUTION No. 8045 IMPROVEMENTS WITHINION TO AN AREA DETERMINEDCERTAIN
BESANITARY
A SEWER SEWER
IMPROVEMENTS
IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS SEWER
IMPROVE?°FN'L DISTRICT FOR S.W. HILLVIEW; DESCRIBING THE
DEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF
PROBABLE TOTAL COST THEREOF;
THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED AND ASSESSED; APPROVING
AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WORK AND
ESTIMATES OF THE CITY'S ENGINEER, AND SETTING PUBLIC
HEARING AND DIRECTING THE GIVING OF NOTICE THEREOF.
(a) Director of Public Works noted that the estimated total cost would be
$13,100 with the City engineering staff doing the engineering work. The
Public hearing will be held June 23, 1980, and he recommended approval.
(b) Motion by Councilwoman Stimler, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
WN
DOWN-
12. RESOLUTION PTo. 80-46 TOWNTIGARDNCOMMITTEE, DECLARINGCREATING AN AANOEMERO NCYSE
AND FIXING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) Planning Director recommended approval and requested Council appoint the
following persons to the committee at this time.
Park Board Representative: Phil Hirl
Library Board Representative: Madalyn Utz
NPO #1 Member: Roger Brown
Chamber of Commerce Representatives: David Dresser, J. Allan Paterson,
Don Hanson, Dick Kadel
Citizens At Large Representatives: Carol Jones & Jean Halderson
He also stated that staff would be represented by Frank Currie or himself
and that Council would have to appoint a financial advisor at a later date.
(b) Motion by Councilman
seconded
Councilman
n1an to adopt Resolution
No. $0-46 and appitthe personsecommendedbythe PlanningDirector '
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
13. RESOLUTION No. 80-47 No. 80-08, CCEPTING
�AIOF THE TIGA
THERPUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS D CITY COUNCIL ACONSTRUCTEDING TION
WITHIN YF.-OLDE-WINDMILL SUBDIVISION, SUBJECT TO THE HEREI
SPECIFIED CONDITIONS.
(a) Director of Public Works stated this was a housekeeping item and noted that
Resolution No. 80-08 was accepted in error at''a previous meeting.
(b) ' Motion by Councilman Scheckla, seconded by Councilman Brian to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
14. TEMPORARY USE EXTENSION REQUEST LAIC WESTON (6 months)
June 9, 1980
PAGE 3 REGULAR MEETING'MINUTES - `
(a) City Administrator requested Council approve the request for an additional
six (6) months as the permanent offices will be available by that time.
(b) Motion by Councilwoman Stimler, seconded by Councilman Brian to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
15. ORDINANCE No. 80-46 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CONDITION #2 OF ORDINANCE No. 80-44
DUE TO A TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(Joseph M. VanLom Park Place Condomimiums).
(a) Planning Director requested Council approve ordinance, as a typographical
error on Ordinance No. 80--44, quoted condition #2 wrong.
(b) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Brian to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
16. ORDINANCE No. 80-47 AN ORDINANCE INSERTING A DELETED SENTENCE, DUE TO TYPO-
GRAPHIC_AL ERROR, IN CHAPTER 15.57.010 TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO SENSITIVE LANDS DELCARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIX-
ING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) Planning Director noted that the sentence left out of the original ordinance
was as follows:
"from invasion of flood or water intrusion and damage caused by acts or
omissions to act on the part".
He recommended approval of Ordinance No. 80-47
(b) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilwoman Stimler to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
17. RATIFY NPO #4 & NPO #1 MEMBERSHIP APPOINTMENTS
(a) Planning Director requested Council approve appointment of JoAnne Nordling
to NPO #4 and Ralph Appleman to NPO #1.
(b) 'Motion by Councilman Brian, seconded by Councilwoman Stimler to approve.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
18. REPORT OF 'BID OPENING FOR RECONDITIONING OF EXISTING STREETS - AWARD OF BID
(a) Director of Public Works reported the low bidder was Cascade Construction
Company at $132,006.00and Portland Road and Driveway Company was high at
$156,143,00. It was noted that the Engineer's estimate was $148,050.00.
He recommended `Council 'award the bid to Cascade Construction Company in
the amount of $1632,006.
} (b) Motion by Councilwoman Stimler, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to award bid
to Cascade'Construction Company for $132,006.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
19. BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS
(a) City Administrator reported the Selection Committee findings and stated the
recommendations were embodied in the following resolutions.
PAGE 4 - REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - June 9, 1980
a
(b) RESOLUTION No. 80-48 A 1RESOLU'TION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING APPOINT-
14ENTS TO THE PARK BOARD.
(Elisabeth Golden - 12/31/82; Hiram Fitzpatrick
12/31/83; & Ron Jordon - 12/31/83)
(1) Motion by Councilman Scheckla, seconded by Councilman Cook to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
(c) RESOLUTION No. 80-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING AN
APPOINTMENT TO THE LIBRARY BOARD.
(Walter Munhall - 6/30/82)
(1) Motion by Councilwoman Stimler, seconded by Councilman Brian to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
(d) RESOLUTION No. 8050 - A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MAKING APPOINT-
MENTS TO THE LIBRARY BOARD. (Madaiyn Utz - 6/30/84 and
Roger Pitsinger - 6/30/84) . Both terms to become
effective July 1, 1980.
(1) Motion by Councilwoman Stimler, seconded by Councilman Cook to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
I
8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARINGS OPENED
20. MORNING HILL SUBDIVISION SIDE LOT EASEMENT VACATION REQUEST
(a) Public Hearing Opened
(b) Director of Public Works gave brief synopsis of history of project. '
(c) Public Testimony
No one appeared to speak.
(d) Director of Public Works recommended approval.
(e) Public Hearing Close "���Si"�
(f) ORDINANCE No. 80-W AN ORDINANCE VACATING A TRACT OF LAND IN MORNING BILL
SUBDIVISION, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY,
OREGON, RECORDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(g) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Stimler to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
21. ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION - ZCA 15-80 (Hillview/104th Avenue)
NPO #1
An ordinance adopting findings with respect to an amendment to the 1970 zoning
map of the City of Tigard to conform with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan as
({ PAGE 5 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - June 9, 1980
a
}
adopted and fixing an effective date for Tax Map 2S1 2CC, Tax Lots 2800,
2900, 3000, 3200, 3400 & 3500, Hillview/104th Avenue annexation, BRC 41543,
changing from Washington County RU-4 to City of Tigard R-7 "Urban Low Density
Residential".
(a) Planning Director gave brief synopsis of application and recommended approval.
(b) ORDINANCE No. 80-49 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AN
AMENDMENT TO THE 1970 ZONING I4AP OF THE CITY OF TIGARD
TO CONFORM WITH THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS
ADOPTED AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Hillview/
104th - Annexation).
(c) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Brian to adopt.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
22. CONDITIONAL USE CU 4-80 (The Robert Randall Company) NPO #1
The Planning Commission denial of a request by Thomas J. Edmondi for a Conditional
Use in an M-4 11Industrial Park" zone for RV outside storage as allowed in the
Tigard Municipal Code Section 18.52.020. Also requesting use of floodplain area
for RV storage located at 8900 S.W. Burnham (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2SI 2DB, Tax Lot
200 and Tax Map 2S1 2AD, Tax Lot 2200), which decision has been appealed to the
City Council.
I
(a) Planning Director stated that the applicant Mr. Paul Yang had hard-carried
a letter to the Mayor requesting the public hearing be set over as he was
unable to appear,
(b) Consensus of Council was to'have ithe public hearing readvertised for June
23,;1980, 'at 8:00 P.M. and verbally advised all those in the audience of
the decision not to hear the appeal at this time.
23. 'OTHER
(a), City Administrator stated the Pinebrook Property which the City has been
trying to sell has not sold and the listing with the real estate company
had expired. He stated the City would hold off re-listing the property
to 'see if any offers were made for the purchase. If the market improves
and no offers are made on the property, the City would re-list sometime in
the future.
(b) City Administrator reported he had checked, at Councilwoman Stimler's request
with the Washington County Development Block Grant Program office to see if
the monies being returned by the City of Cornelius could be utilized to
building the half street improvement for the Senior Center. He noted that
the'city 'of Cornelius may be sued if the money is not returned to them,
and thus there ''would'probably not be any money available through this
source for a long period of time.
(c) City Administrator discussed with Council the possibility of receiving
PAGE 6 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - June 9, 1980
,
Y
S
BOR monies for Summerlake Park and stated that the City was applying for
funds at this time. The grading, seeding and ball fields section of the
project would be for $38,800 which $19,40.0 would be the City's share and
the restroom section of the project would be at a cost of $35,000 or
$17,500 for City share.
(d) City Administrator reminded Council that TPOA factfinding would be held
at the Durham Treatment Plant at 9:00 A.M. on June 10, 1980.
(e) City Administrator advised Council that the property on both sides of
City Hall was for sale and the asking price would be about $375,000.
This includes Art Center West, Oleson Design and the book store.
(f) Councilman Cook questioned why a rock group was given a permit for the use
of Cook Park on Sunday, June 8, 1980, and allowed to use such loud amplifiers.
Chief of Police stated the Police Department could not cite any individuals
for the violation of the noise ordinance as the noise meter was not in
their possession, City Administrator stated the permits are issued to
individuals for picnics at the park and the administration does not always
know what is being done at the picnic. The permit was not issued to have a
loud band.
(g) Councilman Cook questioned what the weed cutting status was in the City.
City Administrator stated that the formal. letters of removal would be
sent out shortly, that staff had been contacting people on an informal
basis first, requesting compliance with the weed control ordinance.
(h) Councilwoman Stimler requested Public Works Director call the County and
ask that the tall grass be cut in the right of way at the intersections
of 'Fairhaven and Watkins and 115th and Gaarde as they are creating a
traffic hazard.
(i') Councilman Brian had requested a letter from Vashington County Department
of Public Works which would explain the county road levy in some detail.
He 'noted that this had been received and he passed out copies for Council
perusal.
24. ADJOURNMENT: 8:30 P.M.
Recorder - City of Ti
ATTEST:
a r r City of Tigard
.PAGE 7 ".REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - June 9, 1980
b
1
s
Date
June 9, 1980
1 wish to testify before the Tigard City
Council On the following iters:
(please print your name)
AGENDA ITEM # 4 __-
------
_._--------------�'�-" Item Description
Name, I1ddr_ss E Affiliation
--------
a
i
e
------ _ . _.__r.. _. ...__.. _... r_...3 Date June 9, 1980-
I :ai_.h to testify before the Tigard City Council on
i
the following item: (Please print your name)
i
AGENDA ITEM 4 12
Item Description:MORNING HILI. SUBDIVISION SIDE
i
roponent (for) tI( Opponent (against)
tame, Address and Affiliation �I Name, Address and Affiliation
---------------
}1�
f �
b [ -
7
� � m
a
Date June 9 , 1980
I wish to testify before the Tigard City Council on
the following item: (Please print your name)
AGENDA ITEM # 13
Item Description:
__-----
_----_— opponent (against)
Proponent (for)
Name, Address and Affiliation
'Name, Address and Affiliation
i
I!
iTI _
hI
Y
t l
c
y
f
........ Date June 9 , 198 0
i
I wish to testify before the 01.1
P1e�ise r�riut._ Ft"I
the following item:
AGENDA ITEM #
item Description: ROBERT RANDALL CONDITIONAL USE APPEAL
Opponent (against)
Proponent (for) --
--- ------ -- -'�- — _- ---=tame Address an �
:dame, Address and Affiliation , d A£filia�ian ;? n
i
o
a
PAYMENT OF BILLS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL Y
MAY 31, 1980
PROGRAM BUDGET
Community Protection
Police 7,952.91
Public Works 1 417.37
Municipal Court 325.23
Planning —
797.07
Building 85_7.78
11,350.36
Total Community Protection
Home & Community Quality
10,556.64
Public Works
Social Services
Library 7_,866.96
Aged Services
Youth Services
Historical
2,866.96
Total Social Services
Policy & Administration
Mayor & Council 2,752.49 _
Administration 793.85
Finance 2,232.14
5,778.48
Total Policy & Administration
City Wide Support Functions 10,074.72
Non-departmental
51,539.42
Misc. Accounts (refunds &' payroll deductions, etc.)
CAPITOL BUDGET
Community Protections
Road Acquisition & Dev.
Parks Acquisition & Dev.
10,164.60
879.07
Storm Drainage 5, 16,043.67
Total Community Protection
Support Services
6,340:77
Building Improvements
DEBT SERVICE
GeneralObligation Bond g
1,66 ,45
Bancroft Bond
UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY
24,293.39
Contract
�
u
TOTAL AMOUNT OF CHECKS WRITTEN 140,512,86
r
�j,
1 the Obert
dall
j company
Kristin Square•9500 S.W.Barbur Blvd. •Suite 300•Portland,Oregon 97219•(503)245-1131
.dune 9, 1980
Mayor Alan Mickelson
City of Tigard
12420 S. W. Main
Tigard, Oregon 97223
HAND DELIVERED
CU 4-80
Re; Conditional Use Appeal. )
Dear Mayor Mickelson:
Due to an unexpected difficulty, I will not be able to attend the
City Council Meeting, June 9, 1980, on our appeal for the conditional
use permit for RV parking at 8900 S. W. Burnham.
I hereby respectfully request that this case be deferred to a later
meeting so that our company will be represented.
k
Thank you very much for your consideration and cooperation. k
m
Sincerely,
Paul J. C. Yang
Vice.President
PY sma
cc; Raeldon Barker, City Administrator
R1die Hower, Planning Director
c
i,,
1
t
TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COI-LMISSION HEARING
April 22, 1980 - Agenda Item 5.4 - The Robert Randall Company
Fowler Junior High School - Lecture Room
10865 S.W. Walnut Street Tigard, Oregon
Public notice of this hearing was as follows:
5.4 CONDITIONAL USE, CU 4-^80 (The Robert Randall Company) NPO f#1
A request by Thomas J. Edmonds for a Conditional Use in an M-4
"Industrial Park" Zone for RV outside storage as allowed in the
Tigard Municipal Code Section 18.52.020. Also requesting use of
floodplain area for RV outside storage located at 8900 SW
Burnham (Mash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2DB, Tax Lot 200 and Tax Map
2Sl 2AD, Tax Lot 2200`.
While the public notice stated the meeting would be held in the Double Math
Room of Fowler Junior High, it was held in the Lecture Room instead.
Present for this hearing:
Commission: President Tepedino, Commis
sionore Bonn, Funk, Helmer,
Herron, Kolleas, Smith, Speaker, Popp
t Staff: Howard, Currie
s
Tepedino: I would like to call Item 5.4 May I have the Staff Report
and Recommendations, please.
Howard:
Planning Director Howard read the Staff Report and
Recommendations. He also read into 'he record a
letter;`from:Paul E. Johnson voicing several objec-
tions,`particularly to encroachment into the flood fl
plain. See Exhibits A and B.
z
f
Tepedino: Thank you, staff. May we have the applicant's presentation,
please?
Yang: Mr. Chairman, my Name is Paul Yang. I am an employee of
The ;Robert Randall Company.
The reason we submitted this particular application for your
consideration is not only because we have over the last
several years received numerous or very frequent inquiries
for 13V parking at the existing mini-warehouse'°sites 'which is
an extension to this particular property, As the City of
Tigard has continued to grow over the last few years, the
demand for 'RV parking obviously has increased rather drastic-
ally. What we are proposing here is essentially the fulfill-
ment of a community service The trade-off would be that you
would see all the RV recreation vehicles parked in a regular
residential neighborhood, either on street or private, which
:
5
r
E
e
TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
The Robert Randall Company
April 22, 1980
Pangs often is very unsightly, or become a problem to the neighbor-
(Cont.) hood, and we believe this is a good location for that partic-
ular use. It's in the industrial zone; it is very compatible
with the uses in the general area. In case you are not informed,
one side of the property is being used by the City's Public
Works Department, I suppose—it used to be a sewer treatment
plant. On the other side is the General Telephone Company
and their maintenance yard and some offices. Our proposal is
to use part of the floodplain. However, as our proposal
Indicated, we are not going to disturb the contours, elevations
of the floodplain area; therefore no additional fill will be
introduced into the floodplain area, and we only propose to
put in liZht layers of gravel so that ;,e vehicles can be
parked on it. And according to our engineer's study, as
indicated, the deepest level of the 100 year flood, which
would be defined near the creek, the depth of the water should
not reach more than two feet. Of course, we all knots the
frequency of a 100-year flood---it's not very likely.
Wo will also install an eight-foot fence around the parking
area, and along with some planting materials planted along the
park fence and to obscure the parking area itself, we certainly
will be more than glad to put in plastic strips into the
[ fence; therefore the vehicles Mould not be seen from outside,
and we believe---you know, we want to be a good neighbor just
like everybody else, and we will do everything we can to make
sure that this particular use will not cause any negative
Impact upon the aaighborhood.
As far as the staff recommendations, we certainly would like
to have the board reconsider or consider our request,:using
part of the floodplain arba for;this particular use; and we
also would like to suggest, instead'of the staffrecommendation
of making the half-street improvement on Burnham right 'away''
we believe the long-term solution to the street, or to that
section of the;street, should be complete improvement of the
street, and redoing the whole street,-maybe"in an LID basis.
We certainly would not object
in
certainly would support,
in fact--for an LID if the City should choose to institute
such a programa What I would like to suggest is Instead of
` improving the half street right away, would give the City a
year time to put an LID together, but by the time the year is
up if the local improvement district is not organized, we
would certainly be glad to; go ahead and finish, or complete
the half-street improvement; and also I would like to just
mention the fact that we do have an resident attendant
on the existing mini.-warehousesite; ;therefore the RV parking
area, once it's constructed, will not be left unattended;
in other words we will have a full-time individual there to
properly take care of, to maintain the property, and to watch
-2-
R ry
TP-0SCRIPT OF PLAIRIING COMMISSION FEARING
The Robert Randall Company
April 221 1984
Yang: the property. I can assure you that the project will not be
(Cont.) a nuisance to the neighbors, will be a very valuable addition
to the community that we need; and I believe this particular
- proposal may be the first one in the City of Tigard as far
as providing RV parking. Thank you.
Tepedino: Thank you, Mr. Yang. Are there any other parties wishing to
speak in favor of this proposal-those in favor? Any parties
wishing to speak in opposition to this proposal--those opposed?
Yes, sir. You will have to come forward, please. Anyone
wishing to speak, I would appreciate moving up to the first
two rows.
_ Saub: Mr. Chairman, members of the planning Commission, staff:
I am Larry Saub, a freeholder on Burnham Court at the inter-
section of Hill Street. I am speaking in objection to this
proposed RV storage area. And first let me say that some of
my remarks and questions may be repetitive of those made by
the staff report and their comments.
First of all, as previously mentioned, there is definite
encroachment on greenways, which should not be allowed..
There would be an adverse impact on the environment, adverse
to the well-being of the residents and property owners in
surrounding adjacent areas; there would be considerable
air pollution and noise pollution, it would be essentially
obnoxious, it would be disruptive to the wild life.•-ducks,
r birds and pheasants presently in there, and it would severely
depress market value of adjacent properties. The ,applicant
indicated that this would alleviate present unsightly storage'
of RVs on their own premises, involving that the only other
recourse is to avail themselves of this new 'facility; if it
were allowed. I don't think that would be the situation.
Now this map that was sent out to the property owners that
we received in the mall on`April' 11 on"a small scale site
here there is an arrow pointing to the proposed extension of
S
Ash Avenue. I feel that that should be a first priority '
Insofar as the City is concernedwith respect to traffic; flow
and circulation, facilitating it. It Mould enhance the ?????
and welfare of the residents north of Frerwing—for example .
facilitate quicker response to police protection, fire_protec-
tion and public services ,such as ambulance emergency vehicles.
Thank you.
Tepedino: Thank you, Mr. Saub. Are there any other parties wishing to
speak in opposition to this proposal? Those''against?
i'
Johnson: My name is Paul E. Johnson, 9300 SW Hill Street, and I wart
to show you on the map here approximately how far downy this
s .
r
..j-
{
fi
TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING COMMISSION SEARING
The Robert Randall Company
April 22, 1980
Johnson: area they'd be coming. Okay-it would extend out into this
(Cont.) rection of land right here--it would come down to 35 feet fro^
this Fauna Creek, which Is almost -- it looks like about
two thirds of the way across this greenwdytharsch is encroaching
on the floodplain and the greenway
ch wild-
life down in this area right now __ many kinds of ducks and
birds __ and they want to take out eight inches of dirt and
replace it with gravel. By taking this eight inches of dirt
out they are destroying all vegetation on that 35,000 square
feet, which is over half of the land they propose in the
floodplain itself. And as far as the fence goes with the
slats in, the elevation of the residential area is very high
above--thay'd be looking right ocer the fence-a-I don't care
what }Lind of fence they'd put--if it was lU feat, 15 feet--
it would not do the job, you'd be looking right over it. And
this area behind contains some duplexes--just a few feet
away from these duplexes and the housing area there that mould
be looking over the greenway, and looking at all these 194
recreational vehicles like a junk yard, in our front yard.
I believe there would be a much better area, such as a few
miles out of town, not right in the heart of Tigard, for such
a development as this. And people would be coming in day and
th their vehicles--the noise and
night air pollution would
eL
night
up the hill to these residents; and the wild life
in the area would suffer and be leaving the area because of f
the polktants from the gas and cars and the noise, day and
night.
And as far as recreation vehicles, he says they can park on F
the streets--with this development, they would not park on
the streets--they would be parked in storage. Well, this is
not true. The City of T1lgard will not alloy more than 36
hours—or 72 hours--parking on the streets, so they cannot
park'these RV vehicles and leave them on the streets in the
City of Tigard., So I can't see any elimination or any
help in this respect. Okay,, that•s it.
Tepedino: Thank you, Mr. Johnson. Are there any other parties wishing;
to speak against this proposal? Yes, sir.
Stark: I'm Ron Stark, 9340 SJ Sill Street in Tigard, and in general
I oppose it for the same reasons that have been given so far.
Another one I would like to add is the use of the RV parking
facility is probably most likely to occur during the highest
periods of flooding; and I have a concern that they would
be able to get most of the RV vehicles ant of the parking
area, and given a flood situation, which can occur any time
` very rapidly, and physically at odd hours of bath day and
night. And so I` think here;the "park at your own risk" is
definitely' a high risk as it stands. I am also concerned
-4-
G
I
TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING commISSION HEARING
The Robert Randall Company
April 22, 1980
Starke as to -- I wonder hoes many of the RV units that would be
(Cont.) parking in this facility wauld belong to Tigard residents.
how
I think indeed it is performinge.rformedcgorbut thelTigardrarea.
much of that service is being P
Thank you.
Tepedino: Thank you, Mr. Stark. Any other parties dishing to speak
in opposition to this proposal? Those opposed? (No response.)
Now is an opportunity for cross—examination and rebuttal.
Mr. ;tang?
Yang': I w.auld just like to just make a few points of clarification.
»:ber of vehicles v;ould be likelc
The number of units, the nu
to park in this facility: wo estimate"' it could conceivably,
ls, as high as 190 some units;
if we install very small stal
but based on our recent survey and investigation, we believe
the most we could accommodate on the site probably would be
less than 100 units, and I really don't thinkthe demand is
going to be so great that we are going to go over that number
of units.
Secondly, the time of the vehicles would be used mostly in
the summer time, as you can imagine; and if there is any
traffic at all going to be generated out of the facility, it
ould be in the fear summer months, and most of the rest of
the year we don't believe this particular facility is going
to generate any significant amount of (nasal?) products, or
you know, air.
Again, I gust want to reiterate that we will do everything
wecanto.make this as attractive as possible--certainly going
to be more attractive, we believe, than the sewer plant next
door or the General Telephone services building to the other
side; and`I really think this is' a very critical need, or
community need that needs to be fulfilled. Thank,you.
Tepedino: Thank you, Mr. Yang. Yes, Commissioner Speaker?
Speakers Mr. Yang, I notice on, mhat =you gave to us and what you have
there that on your larger of the three buildings, you say
"new addition". Is that something we are passing on tonight?
Yang: No. That is an additional building which we are building on
the area which is certainly above the 100 year flood elevation,
which is simply an extension of the existing use, and I
believe that the city has reviewed everything that we presented,
and they are prepared to grant us a building permit; and that
is an outright permitted use, and does not require any condi—
tional use permit.
Speaker: It is a permitted use?
TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING CO101ISSION HEARING
The Robert Randall Company
April 22, 1980
Howard: Yes, it is; and it's an addition that Came through site
design review and it has been app
Bann:
I have a question, Mr. Yang. What are your 'riours of operation—
what do you propose would: be your hours of operation?
Yang: Well, I would say it probably would follow the same hours of
–warehouse, which I believe is like
operation as for the mini
ing at the latest.
8:30 to about 7 or 8 o'clobu Znbalievetheetihat is the schedule
I haven't verified that,
they follow.
-Funk: ,tr. Yang, I would lire to a s?. you aboilt three di fe.r^^t ones-
tions here. The area that you have colored there in brown,
evidently, is the 63,000 square feet?
Yang: That's correct.
Funk: And staff is approving 28,000 square feet in parking.
NOW
first of all I have got to find out what is the size parking
spaces you have allocated or allotted.
Yang:
Well, we believe -- are you asking me hoer many cars we can
accommodate if we are reduced to 28,000 square feet?
Funk: That's what I'm getting to. Yes.
Yang: We estimate probably around between 40 to 50 vehicles•-at
se, we
most. And I frankly don't believe, if that' the ca
are going to even be able to accommodate that much, because
w1th the extended warehouse structure, and certainly as part
of the area above the ZOO year flood elevation, it's going to
be used for that purpose. Well,' I think itis going to be
less than 2.8,000 square .feet, takinn the area above the lOO
year floodplain, flood elevation.
Funk:
So as the staff recommends now, for approval based on 28,000
square feet, T haven't heard you say .whether you'd accepted
staff's recommendations.
Yang: (Chuckling) Well, we certainly would prefer that you, the
board, would give us consideration for the approval of the
application as submitted. It certainly is your prerogetive,
and if you should take the staff's recomaendation, me certainly
Vould have to reexamine the situation and see If it is even
feasible to develop the property.
Funk: I might ask those people that are in objection to this, if
they have reviewed the staff recommendation and hoer they might
feel to an RV park of 49 and 50 parking spaces, in that area,
versus 194- Z guess that' p�
—6—
TRANSCRIPT OF PLAIVITING COhDIISSI011 HEARING
The Robert Randall Company
April 22, 1980
Voice: (Of an opponent?) personally I would prefer that it not be done;
but if there seems to be a market and a need for that type
of RV parking, I Mould recommend that the staff's proposal
be adopted, certainly over an extension.
Fink: I think that's all.
Tepedino: Mr. Speaker has a question on green.
$
Yang: Sure. The green axea is again part of this property required
as indicated as definitely in a floodplain area -- that green
area is Fanno Creek. The creek follows this line; so this
area is �rna
_Lt e _vc cc:=jtted, as we have. -indica' o ;ire
Howard, that we mould be very glad to dedicate teat to the
City for park purposes.
Tepedino: I've got a question for staff. Are we talking about invasion
of the floodplain?
Howard: With the dedication of the greenway?
Tepedino: Well, no; with the green area that he is indicating there—
that's the area they are saying will be dedicated to the City. i
Is that right?
Howard: No; he's shorting you 67,000 square foot in brown. I'm saying
that the brown would be reduced and would become green, at
23,000 feet, somewhere in that neighborhood. That would take
him out of the 100,year floodplain and allow about 40 units.
yang: Mr. Chairman, if I may, I_would clarify that point a little
further.> The 100,year floodplain as indicated on our nap,
of which you have a copy, is an elevation of 147 feet. ' In
other words, it generally follows this line here. So if the
staff recommendation is approved, meaning that our narking
area world be restrictedonly up to this line. Beyond this
line would all become green area.
ry
Tepedino: Play I ask a question, Mr. Yang? Tigard has had a histthe
of
dealing with the floodplain very cautiously. 'u(hat is the
impetus behind your proposal for invading the flood --what
forces you into that position?
Yang: ' Well, we — first of all we realize the sensitivity of the
floodplain area. One of the major problems of the floodplain
is once;you develop something in the area, then you are
taking away the storage space for water; and we are not doing
that. We are deliberately trying to avoid that problem.
Therefore what we are suggesting is simply Putting a gravel '
-7-
{
TRANSCRIPT OF PLUTNING C0101ISSION HEARING
The Robert Randall Company
April 22, 1930
Yang. cover---that's why we suggest taking up the dirt, replace it
Cont.) with gravel--so that the storage capacity for the floodpl, _in
area would not be changed, and that's our feeling -- in fact
when we purchased the property we had in mind that this will
be a permitted use and accessible use, and what we are essen-
tially suggesting here is we dedicate one-third of the property,
--a litle over one-third of the property—to the City and
retain a little less than two-thirds for our use; and in
essence what the staff is proposing is to ask us to dedicate
about two-thirds of the property we acquired, and retain only
one-third for our use.
;= 'P.yle dinOl 1".^.an you, Y.-11 ;.�,
S�
or cross-examination or rebuttal?
Davenport; Yes, sir. First of all, my name is Alike Davenport, and
I'm a resident at 13775 Std Ash Avenue, and it seems like
Mr. Yang is -- he goes from 198 cars to 120 cars, now it's
demon: to, in accordance with the proposed recommendation,
he has gotten it down to maybe 50 cars, and he's a little
queazy about this.
First of all, it removes the 8 inches of soil and puts gravel
t down. If we do have a flood, that's more accessible to
wash out quicker than just natural soils. Second of all, the
a--if we do recommend a proposal where they car_ store 50 cars,
It in essence will add some screws on all planning commissions
eventually they will branch out in years to come, they will
say', "',tell, we are already here", and the planning commission
automatically says, "Well, okay, we will let tham have their'
128 cars", or whatever. 'Khat I am asking the commission to
deny the request for the RandallCompany, and let them find
some other land somewhere else.
Tepedino; Thank you, Air. Davenport. Any other questions, comments
or cross=-exam or rebuttal on the issues raised directly? Sir?
Voice: Yes. Considering this area is proposed for a flood plain,
or close to a floodplain area, is theme a provision for any
type of flood insurance, and have they made some sort of
marketing'indication or request to find out how many people
would be willing to park their vehicles, given that there is
no flood insurance, and that they are doing it at their own
risk? These are fairly expensive, heavy investments to some
people, and would they be willing to deal with that?
Yang: We certainly Mould look into that and I think part of the
facility in the floodplain area, we always could apply` for
federal flood insurance coverage; and secondly again, this
i
TRANSCRIPT OF PT,MM ING C01MISSION HEARING
The Robert Randall Company
April 22, 1980
i
Yang: facility is attended by a full-time individual, and in case
(Cont.) of a flood we believe are should have sufficient warning and
preparation, to avoid any possible damage. And thirdly, as
I indicated and as our engineer's study indicated, at the
deepest possible level the floodwaters would not exceed two
feet; and .in most of the area, for the upper part, mould be
less than one feet, and so we really don't see that's going
to be a problem.
Voice: Again I would like to emphasize that where you don't propose
changing the contours and elevation that the vegetation
definitely, the loss of vegetation is a problem; and do the
enoireering studies indicate. any do;mstraaM c f'far,ts fro=,
say, the washout of gravel or the increased floor from heavy
flooding?
Yang: Our engineer indicated that in fact when replacing the existing
topsoil with gravel Mould actually improve the condition so
that there would be less chances of erosion and it will
actually improve condition.
Tepedino: I close the cross-exam and rebuttal period; and noir, Commi-
ssioners? Your discussion and action? Commissioner Popp.
a
Popp: I am going to start by going back a step.. Finding of Fact #6,
I want some clarification. Aldie states there:
Statement §4 in the Applicant's Narrative needs to
-
be clarified. CU 7-73, Condition #6 states "no
outside storage of materials, vehicles, waste or
debris will be permitted on site'. The record is
not clear as to whether or not this prohibition
was intended for the buildings only or for the
entire site. If the latter is the case, then this
use would not be alloyed.
Wehad in past; years several hearings come up regarding
different interests . (a few words unclear)"
and I think the intent, as best as I recall it was interpreted
that the intent was that under no circumstances were any
outside vehicles or 'storage of any type of materials or
anyttLtng-'else could be stored. One of the 'purposes of Security
Storage and the type of structures that were constructed there
to provide storage for all types—whether it's household goods
or personal property or boats, campers, trailers, whatever
u` hai in storage. These are various sizes, and I know some
of tl..,ese =big, ,big trailers may not fit inside of these
"--rages; but it's irrelevant. Nevertheless this was the condi-
tion at that time, and this was something we very definitely
.._ stipulated on also it is stated on here there would be no
a .v
TRANSCRIPT OF PLAIiiYING COMi•fISSIOX HEARIZIG
The Robert Randall Company
April 22, 1980
Poon: no outside storage of materials, waste or debris.
(Cont.)
The other point I want to bring up is that I have a feeling
that even if this goes through, I am afraid it would be
illegal, even though we are talking about removing some earth
or dirt and bringing in gravel to replace it, because I don't
believe it would be legal or permissible without a specific
floodplain, fill permit; and in the sensitive lands Chapter
18.57 (.020) we have the paragraph (3): "Fill" means any
act ,by ►Which earth, sand, gravel, rock or any other similar
material is deposited, placed, pulled or transported, and
includes the conditions resulting therefrom." I think that
removing earth and f Hing ^.t th _arel, I thin_
an effect upon it, and I think in my ovm mind that we are
encroaching upon the greenway in a manner which I think in
the long run actually will be detrimental. I don't think
it's necessary that we park RVs down in this greenway area;
I believe there are other sites possibly that would be avail—
able, that would be more suitable for RV storage than the
greenway area. My ovm feeling is very strongly that I would
be opposed to recreational vehicle storage in this Security
Storage facility.
f
Tepedino: Are you making a motion, sir?
Popp: No. I was going to let someone else make a comment, but I
will make a motion: that the request for outside storage
of RV vehicles on the Security Storage property on S71 Burnham
be denied.
Tepedino: motion is made.
$olleas: Second.
Tepedino: Seconded. rurther discussion? Commissioner Herron?
Herron:: (Unclear, but effect :las no further comments from her.)
Tepedino: Commissioner Speaker?
Speaker: Well, I must say I am not enthusiastic about RV vehicles down
there, but I do think that the staff recommendation does
eliminate this excavating 8 inches and filling in with gravel
in the 100 year floodplain. Is that correct?
Howard: Yes, sir,' that is correct
Speaker: So part, Al (Popp), .of your suggestion is kind of`'moot,,in
line with staff's recommendation. In other words there would
t be no encroachment in the 100—year floodplain based on staff's
.recommendation.
ml0w
S
TRANSCRIPT OF PLATINING COMMISSION MkRING
The Robert Randall Company
April 22, 1980
Howard: That's correct.
Popp: (After an indistinct short question, probably from Tepedino)
. . . outside storage, and that's mainly what I based my
objections on.
Tepedino: That's a real problem, and from my past experience on the
planning commission the policy has always been to strictly
adhere to that. But I have never seen it come up in this
context. I don't know whether you remember back.
Popp: It's not come up in this context before. I donQt think we
have ever been asked for RV storage before.
Tepedino: That1s right. Staff, do you have a comment?
Popp: If you recall--excuse me just a minute, excuse me—I was going
to state that on the east side of the Security Storage lot,
which is one of the larger units there, that some of those
are being used for purposes—that's where some of these
pant requisitions, requirements--requests, I should say--
have come up in the past for several kinds of businesses
to be located in there. We put some very strict stipulations
on them regarding manufacturing, packing materials, storage,
the hours, type of vehicle that would be there, and so on; and
one of the stipulations I remember (was that ) there would
be no overnight parking--no outside storage of vehicles or
any, type ,of materials or any kind of,goods or products or
anything of that nature.
Funk: Mx Chairman, may I ask--surely after°I was appointed back
in;1978, there was a request for a boat sales and; storage
down in that area. Is that correct? Whatever became of
that?
Howard': That's correct. They broke ground last geek.
Plink: It•s under construction now. There is going to be outside
boat storage in that area,also, isn't 'there?
_ Howard: Yes, but that will be screened, and that will be totally
outside of the floodplain. Theresa other outside storage
allowed; now, 'right back of Familian Northwest Plumbing
Supply=--remember they dedicated the greenway, we allowed them
outside storage; Paige Stevens y
Tepedino: They put up big bushes around the thingM-a fence?
Howard: Right, the same thing. In this particular case, my only
concern was if you keep them out of the floodplain--all
right?--they will park a reduced amount of vehicles there;
dll-
WE
S
TRANSCRIPT OF PLANNING GOrLMISSION HEARING
The Robert Randall Company
April 22, 198^
Howard: but they would not=--in the case of a flood--if they were
(Cont.) allowed in the floodplain, in the case of a flood---where
would they take a hundred vehicles? Now you can't park them
on the public streets, you can't move them into the develop-
ment because people are occupying those spaces and they are
paying; rent, so where do they go? Do you call a hundred
people and say, you know, "The Mater is high and your mobile
home has to ge"? That's why we event back to the about 23,000
square feet which would allow about the 40 units out of the
floodplain, screen it well; but on the other hand we also
asked for the dedication of the greenway, realizing that we
would have a pari: eventually. So, there's a balancing act
going ons .a ad : t it- -you '_ o�.: thi i� s t ., ero _ tea,;_
is proposed,.
Flank: That's why I can really see no problem with the staff recom-
mendation, and I personally think we should approve it and
let the applicant decide if it's a viable venture.
Tepedino: There is a motion on the floor which has been made and
seconded. Any further comments before I call for the question
on this motion?
Voice: (Yang?) Can I make one comment?
Tepedino: I am sorry--the public hearing is closed.
Smith: Initially I think I felt that if we moved back to the 100
year floodplain . . (and imposed) . . restrictions on screening;
but I think Mr.'Popp 'probably brings uv a very .good point
with regard to the Item 6 there. And I do remember previous
meetings where we have discussed the question of outside
storage, etc. The purpose of this type of development is to
prov-1de an inside storage, and particularly with the green.
way and the type of development that's being projected for
the city in that area, I don't really see this as being
compatible; and I think if the site were different and your
Statement of Fact #6 wasn't a factor in this, I think I
might loot: at . . I think I would m . . my
vote . . . (last part of sentence lost due to coughing).
T,a-pediuo: Further questions and comments before I call for the question?
Yang: Can I make a clarification of a fact?
Tepedino: unless you are recognized by one of the commissioners. 1111E
recognize;you---for three seconds.
r Yang: Thank you. There's ons part, I think, about Item #6. I `should t
®12P }
I
L
1
TRANSCRIPT OF PIJUPITING COt->;4ISSION HEARING
The Robert Randall Company
April 22, 1980
Yang. have explained earlier that this is really two different
) properties. :1e owned this piece for the last several years. i
(Cont.
Only recently this piece of property was acquired by us.
The property owner came to us and indicated the property is r
We are the only logical one—or
maybe
virtually landlocked.
the telephone company-would be the logical one to acquire the
property; so what we are proposing here really is different
from—you may have to see that as a separate application.
The condition you imposed on Item No. 6 as stated in the
staff report was imposed for the development of this first
property, where really it is t.ro different projects.
Tepadiao: I Call for the questian--tile notion is made and seconded for
as made and seconded
denial. All those in favor of the m
for denial signify by raying aye.
}
{
Chorus: Aye.
Tepedino: And those opposed?
Two voices: Opposed. (They were Helmer and Funk.)
C
Howard: I heard two opposed.
Tepedino: Two opposed? Two opposed. ,
Howard: And it would be denied. ,
nial, two opposed. The motion carries
Tepedino: seven in favor of de
for denial.'
r,
E
F
2:
t._
4<
I
w
E
—13—
t .
» t r
� �4
q
eNpo A.?plicazt", Please complete the questi.ocas �cloa:
;t
r
—ADDRESS �)
TELEPHONE �tlI3�E PRESENT OCCUPATIO`i
EOi3 Y.OuG F–WE YOU BEEN WITH THIS FIRMA?
IS THIS CM:T.A-N"? LOCATED 191T TrHIN YOTJR. "C) AP'EA?
RAVE YOU BE--N I.'`vOLVED VrTF. WjLNICIP«L OPEFUNTIO�IS EEFORZ? �
IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR
T!;•AT DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN OFFER AS A 1MMER OF AN N4P0? (1z?,t'C % �1 •'�' �r�°s
ADDT_TI.O'NAL. CO:-RC- TS:
1 r- ,r/ }� f l
DavtIme Telephone Nu-nil7er �F !!� _f
' r
NEIGHBORHOOD PLM' ORCANIZATWN; t:Et•G=.R
r'l PETUCON FOR A?POt2-"Lt c;tT - CITY OF TCGAP.D
To the ionorabLe Mayor and City Council of the City of TigarrL, Oregon:
Ne, chc signacors of this pecitton, being each eli;ible for membcrshtp in NFU
under the provisions of Tigard Council Cesolu 'an Vo_ , respect uLly petirion the.
City o£ Tigard to accept our nomination of C
for appo in,ty ent to membership in NPO J'.':i a represenrat ivc % Lac.e o£ the residents
property owners, business licensees and pan
-procit organizations L cited witl3-a this
neizhborhood's boundaries.
NAME ADDRESS
I Leo-
4.
5. ZVI
7.
C� 2 -
s. s. z .. .
a
10
12.
15-6, k,-,
Question: Zd,,at are NEW s? -
f
Ansrzer: The 'function of each NFO is to be involved in all phases of the coW el ensiv¢ pia-t
ming process and the implementation of those puns; to review City plas; policies, projects . ,
or other actions affecti.i,g the livability o_ the neial-borhoad including but r,.3t limitee
to, Sand s-2, zoning, housinv, community, facilities, human resources, social and recreaC3—ia_..
program-S, traffic and transportatia n, environmental, Cuslity, open space and paeks; to
participate in the process of deterz;nin City priorities for capital impravezer-ts 2nd
develops-tient or specific project plans; to keep the neighborhood informed;' >o seats ne-iQhbarnc..
Opinion on issues brought before Chea; to repres •nt the views of the neighbarh2oc in mirte-s
of extra neLzhbornood iraportance.
I4EMORANDUM
T0: City Council
FROM: Frank Currie, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: laid Summary For Reconditioning of E `fisting Streets
DATE: June 4, 1980
Attached please find the bid summary for reconditioning of existing streets
submitted to the City of Tigard on May 29, 1980.
Cascade Construction Company was the low bidder of $132,006.00. Portland Road
and Driveway Company was the high of $156,143.00. The Engineer's estimate was
$148,050.00.
It is my recommendation to the City Council that they award the low bid to
Cascade Construction Company, the low bid of $132,006.00.
BID SUMMARY FOR RECONDITIONING OF EXISTING STREETS
MAY 29, 1980
SURFACE B C D TOTAL
COMPANY NAME TYPE
3.. Cascade Construction Co. No Units 675.00 2,860.00 1,400.00
P.O. Box 4267 Unit Price 25.20 26.60 27.80
Portland, OR 97208 Bid Cost 17,010.00 76,076.00 38,920.00
132,006.00
2. Riedel Internat'l. No Units 675.00 2,860.00 1,400.00
P.O. Box 3320 Unit Price 27.25 27.10 29.50
Portland, OR 97208 Bid Cost 18,393.75 77,506.00 41,300.00 137,199.75
3. Baker Rock Crushing No Units 675.00 2,860.00 1,400.00
21880 SW Farmington Unit Price 26.70 27.74 28.62
Beaverton, OR 97007 Bid Cost 18,022.50 79,336.40 40,068.00 137,426.90
4. Oregon Asphaltic Paving No Units 675.00 2,860.00 1,400.00
1220 SE 190th Ave. Unit Price 26.90 27.90 28.60
Portland, OR 97223 Bid Cost 18,157.50 79,794.00 40,040.00 137,991.50
5. K. F. Jacobsen` & Co.< No Units 675.00 2,860.00 1,400.00
P.O. Box 02215 Unit Price 27.95 27.95 29.00
Portland, OR 97202 Bid Cost 18,$66.25 79,937.00 40,60Q.00 139,403.25
6. Porter W Yett' Co. No Units 675.00 2,860.00 1,400.00
6500 NE Ainsworth Unit Cost 28.30 28.30 29.30
T Portland, OR 97218 Bid Cost 19,102.50 80,938.00 41,020.00
141.,060.50
7. Portland Road No Units 675.00 2,860.00 1,400.00
& Driveway Co.' Unit Price 31.64 31.64 31.64
7295 SE King Rd. Bid Cost 21,375.00 90,490.00 44,296.00 *156,143.00
Portland, OR 97222
* NO TOTAL INCLUDED IN BID
r ,
- -- --- _ _B f)--FOR--RECONI)3`TIONINE3-OF-__FX1ST1NG--STREETS--- -
- 80 3-_00
1 2 3 5 6
,
fII
- - ;— -- - - i 1;Bld .I3-id ---Total -
_ J -- -I
--- Qe,aala.f
1 1 I Aortland Road I' I r I
— -- —
1 ,
- -- I l
11 L)ri sewa- y co �''�,--� --
2 1 (� 2
King Rd
3 Bortl ncl_ 97-222_ .__
T
}I4 � i
(15�
6 4._2 .or
I; e _ T . ettCol� 4-t -C I - 1 ..-
---jl s 4-
X500
X500 NE Ainsworth
-
� f
k�ortland ORI t- } { I }
9721#3
�t
I Imo_ 8
I'
-_—
II
,�
--
11�
9
10 jT 7—
—
5
-
0
iII 3 --C-F
SELECTION COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 5, 1930
PRESENT: Mayor Alan Mickelson, Councilman Tom Brian, City Administrator Raeldon Barker
COMMENCED: 4:00 P.M.
INTERVIEWED:
Planning Commission: David Atkinson
Library Board: Margaret Gottleb, Walter Munhall, Madalyn Utz, Vince Matarrese, &
Roger Pitsinger
Park Board: Elisabeth Golden & Hiram Fitzpatrick
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Park Board: 1. Elisabeth Golden - 2z year term
2. Hiram Fitzpatrick - 3z year term
3. Ron Jordon - 32 year term
Library Board: 1. Walter Munhall - 2 year term
2. Madalyn Utz - 4 year term
3. Roger Pitsinger - 4 year term
Planning Commission: Interview remainder of applicants before making decision
regarding appointments.
ADJOURNED: 6:30 P.M.
R&A
Rae don R. Barker, City Administrator>
t
-------------
U00" TYOFTICAMD
WASHINGTON COUNTY,OREGON!
May 21, 1--80
XZRWOOD ESTATES, INC.
C/o W. W. Hughes
R O Box 673
Scappoose, Oregon 97056
C/O Kez-it Carlile
Route 3, Box 278-M
Sherwood, Oregon 97140
Gentlemen:
The City Council received a letter from residents of K'erwood Estates at a
meting held Monday, May 19` 1980. You have asked that your performance
bond be released and we were asked by the Council to review the letter,
the subdivision, and the brand requi.reraents.
We request the following ;action:
1. That you provide the necessary, agreements for cormnon access to serve
Lots 34 35, 36, 37, 38;, and 39 to 'include sharing of joint access and-
responsibIli,ty for maintenance We 'feel this is a matter between you
and the buyers at this stage. It was an original condition of your
development and we will insist upon documentary proof of compliance.
2_ Application for a variance from the conditions placed upon the development
relative to providing parking and private drives to serve Lots 34 through
39. We feel that the owners of these properties may not wish to have
t is parking provided at this stage in the development. You will contact
them to ascertain their feelings and request a variance or install the
parking areas.
3.- You will' review the enclosed landscaping suggestions which have been
submitted to ws by the homeowners. We suggest that you contact the
people and resolve this issue. You installed the berm, now you should
provide a landscaping plan superimposed on construction drawings:;
We require that you provide a planting material index clearly stating
variety, size, and location. Again, the property owners will maintain
the berm and we want you to satisfy them first.
r
4. The City has given you a list of items which will be corrected. Refer
to our letter, dated January 24, 1980.
I'
12420 S.W. MAIN P.O. BOX 23347 TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PH: 639-4171
I
ligggylg 10
OWNS=M
1
Page 2
5. You have thirty (30) days to resolve these issues or we will proceed
against your performance bond to the satisfaction of the homowners
and the City.
Any questions should be directed to r,�-, or to Mr. Frank Currie, the Public:
Works Dixector.
Yours.,trci7.
edie How
g Director
AHvmC
cc: City Council
R. R. Barker
J. Bailey
M. Busher
i
m