Loading...
City Council Packet - 04/16/1979 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION APRIL 16, 1979, 7:30 PM FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL LECTURE ROOM .AGENDA: 1. ROLL CALL 2. ORDINANCE No. 79-25 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AN APPLICATION BY MR. WILLIAM A. GODWIN FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1970 ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TIGARD, CHANGING THE ZONE DISTRICT FOR A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED AT SW SATTLER AND SW 89TH AVENUE AND DEPICTED ON WASHINGTON COUNTY TAX MAP 2S1 11AD, TAX LOT 6500, FROM THE CITY OF TIGARD "R-7" TO CITY OF TIGARD "R-7PD" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEDTTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND ADOPTING EXHIBITS "A", "B" AND "C", GRANTING THE APPLICATION AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (a) Tabled from April 9, 1979 Council Meeting. 3. ORDINANCE No. 79-26 AN ORDINANCE SPECIFYING THE,ANNEXATION PLAN FOR VARIOUS UNINCORPORATED LANDS WHICH ARE WITHIN TIGARD'S URBAN PLANNING AREA AND MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS SEVEN DISTRICT AREAS REFERENCED BY ADOPTED NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION PLANS. (a) Review of revised ordinance. 4. REVIEW OF SUMMERLAKE PROJECT BY PARK BOARD. 5s KATHERINE STREET L.I.D. - report by Harris & McMonagle 6`. GRAYSON INVESTMENTS - request for bond for 'sewer connection fees -r City Administrator,. T. POLICY REGARDING PRESSURE'SEWER :SYSTEMS City Administrator. 8. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES REFUND $13,050 - Staff recommendation and waivering of any further system development charges at the time of issuance of building permits - OakHill`Investment Project (Elmer's Pancake House, Commercial Office and Residential Planned Development)`-City Administrator. 9 McDONALD SE14ER ASSOCIATION PROPOSAL - City Administrator 10'.. WINDMILL SUBDIVISION PERFORMANCE BOND City Administrator strator 11. DISCUSSION REGARDING,,SALARIES FOR 'CORPORAL`POSITION - Chief of Police 12. PROPOSED RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING FUNDS' - City Administrator F c 13. DISCUSSION ON ANNUAL REPORT - City Administrator i 14. OTHER 15. ADJOURN14ENT COUNCIL AGENDA'- APRIL 16,' 1979 T 0 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MINUTES, APRIL 16, 1979, 7:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor Alan Mickelson; Councilmen Tom Brian, John E. Cook, Kenneth W. Scheckla; Councilwoman Nancie Stimler; Legal Counsel, Joe D. Bailey; Chief of Police, Robert B. Adams; City Administrator, R.R. Barker; City Recorder/Finance Director, Doris Hartig; Planning Director, Aldace Howard; Associate Planner, Ken Selby; Research & Development Aide, Martha McLennan. 2. ORDINANCE NO. 79-25 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AN APPLICATION BY MR. WILLIAM GODWIN FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1970 ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TIGARD, CHANGING THE ZONE DISTRICT FOR A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED AT SW SATTLER AND SW 89TH AVENUE AND DEPICTED ON WASHINGTON COUNTY TAX MAP 2S1 11AD, TAX LOT 6500, FROM THE CITY OF TIGARD "R-7" TO CITY OF TIGARD "R•-7PD" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDE14IIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND ADOPTING EXHIBITS "A", "B" AND "C", GRANTING THE APPLICATION AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (a) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to remove from the table. Removed from the table by unanimous vote of Council. (b) Richard Drinkwater, Engineer, explained the re-designed project which was intended to comply with the concerns raised by Council, i.e.: widening the street and providing access to the park. '` (c) Councilwoman Stimler felt that there still would be an, access problem for emergency vehicles in the park. (d) Planning Director suggested that this should be reviewed and approved by staff prior to Council's further consideration. (e) Motion by Councilwoman Stimler, seconded by CouncilmanBrian to re- table the Ordinance until such time as the"project can be reviewed and approved by staff. Re-tabled by unanimous vote of Council. 3. ORDINANCE NO. 79-26 AN ORDINANCE SPECIFYING THE ANNEXATION PLAN FOR VARIOUS; UNINCORPORATED LANDS WHICH ARE WITHIN TIGARD'S URBAN PLANNING AREA AND MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AS SEVEN DISTRICT AREAS REFERENCED BY ADOPTED NEIGHBORHOOD' PLAN- NING ORGANIZATION PLANS. (a) Planning Director asked for any questions from Council and stated that this would be placed on next Monday's agenda for'it's second reading. { (b) Councilman Brian pointed out several corrections needed: 1) In the policy statement for Subarea #5 the sentence should read, "The City should immediately consider annexation of this entire subarea."; f f x 2) In the policy statement for Subarea #11 the sentence should read, "This "island" subarea should be immediately considered for annexation by the City."' and 3) The last subarea listed should be referenced as Subarea #13 rather than the typographical error, #12. (c) Planning Director said that he would make the necessary changes. 4. REVIEW OF SUMHER7AKE PROJECT BY PARK BOARD (a) Fred Cooper, Park Board Chairperson, gave a review of the status of the project and introduced Jerry Draggoo, a design consultant on the project. (b) Jerry Draggoo, Director of Planning, gave a brief history of the project, described and pointed out the site plan, and gave a brief slide show of the proposed park lands. He described some of the special concerns of this project, including the bog/marshy areas, high points of land, and access. He went on to discuss funding options including a possible BOR grant application, and mentioned that the first rough cost estimates for development were in the $.500,000 range. t (c) Bill Allen, Project Designer, discussed the design concept, explaining that after initial consideration of the area as a passive/natural area, i they felt that a higher degree of development would be more desirable (to include ball fields, tennis courts, formal seating areas, etc.). f He went on to point out the good access and inclusion of adequate parking facilities. He discussed in detail the proposal for dredging portions of the lakes; explaining that the proposal includes the dredging of marshy areas which would be subject to high usage and isolation of remaining marshy areas to protect their natural state and provide wild- life habitat. He concluded by saying that the project was designed in such a way that it could be developed in phases. r . (d) Fred Cooper stated that the project has the approval of the Park Board, and pointed out that it fits into the Environmental and'Open`Space Plano He concluded by saying that he is pleased with the project and hopes to bring it up for final approval soon. r (e) Planning Director, referencing to a letter from Mr. Krueger (who owns adjacent lands which hopefully can be included in the plan), requesting a credit against his;Systems Development Charges in light of his donation of 10% of his lands for the project. (f); Mr. Krueger stated that he approved of the park proposal and felt that it would he a benefit to the area. He asked that Council consider creditinghim'for the donation of lands. ? (g) Planning Director suggested that Mr. Krueger'meet with the consultants and Park board to discuss placement of the street (which would impact on the SDC). t : { STUDY SESSION MINUTES, APRIL 16, 1979 Page' 2 E < t } 1 c. a r 5, KATHERINE STREET L.I.D. (a) City Administrator introduced Stuart L. Cato of Harris and Macrionagle, consulting engineers on the project. (b) Stuart Cato discussed the project, explaining that there were several options for development, each of which had different questions relating to cost and boundaries of the L.I.D. He went on to describe each of the options in detail and asked for direction frcm Council and local residents. (c) Paul Patrick, a resident in the proposed L.I.D. district, pointed out that it would be difficult to obtain the necessary easement in option „'1. He went on to say that option #3 looks good. (d) Mayor Mickelson suggested that Stuart Cato meet with the residents to select an option. 6. City Administrator, noting that there were persons in the audience for several agenda items, requested that Items #6, 7 and 10 be moved to the end of the agenda. Council agreed to this shift in order of consideration. 7. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE REFUND $13,050 - Oak Hill Investment Project (a) City Administrator gave a brief background on the project. (b) Legal Counsel stated that the City is obligated to credit the developer for at least a portion (street) of the S.D.C. due to the extra improve- ments made by the developer. He stated that there is a formula by Ordinance for doing this and he would prepare the necessary papers. (c) Planning'Staff stated that they had reviewed the project and recommended refund for the street improvements, but not for the park as the site had been changed and no longer provided public access. (d) Roger Staver, Oak Hill Development Corporation, described the problems in the placement of the park. He went on to say that he would be satisfied with the refund for street improvements. (e) Legal Counsel suggested that he meet with Mr. Staver to finalize details this week. 8.` MCDONALD SEVER ASSOCIATION PROPOSAL (a) Dennis West, Dorner & Tunks Inc.; rcnsu1ting Rngineer,,ggyn a nricf overview of the proposal and stated that they were requesting only concept approval at this time. (b) City Administrator recommended conceptual approval of Trunk A with the stipulation recommended by the City Engineer relating to responsibilities for maintaining the;pump station. (c) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilwoman Stimler to give conceptual approval of the Trunk A proposal. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. STUDY SESSION MINUTES, APRIL 16, 1979 - Page 3 9. DISCUSSION ON ANNUAL REPORT (a) City Administrator discussed his ideas for the Annual Report, gave pre- liminary cost estimates, explained the problem of insufficient budgeted funds, and asked Council for direction on format and printing. (b) Heidi Thompson, Richard's Studio, gave more detailed information on printing costs and asked Council to make decisions relating to length, color, number of photographs, etc. She concluded by saying that to do a professional job would cost $2,000 to $2,200, which is $600 to $800 more than is budgeted. (c) After lengthy discussion, consensus of Council was to use one ink color, have 12 pages, 15 photographs and consider reduction of the page size. 10. WINDMILL SUBDIVISION PERFORMANCE BOND (a) City Administrator explained that this was an unusual project i1L that some of the work had been performed prior to the signing of the com- pliance agreement. He went on to say that there were no problems with the project, and the work done prior to the agreement was in conformance with the standards. He concluded by saying that since this was an un- usual project he had wanted to bring it to the attention of Council, and would bring it up for approval next week. 11. OTHER (a) Councilwoman Stimler, referencing to Planning Commission minutes of April 3,: 1979, which requested review of the Sensitive Lands Ordinance by a land-use attorney rather than the City Attorney, questioned the problems between the Planning Commission and the;City Attorney. Legal Counsel stated that;the problem;was more one of organizationof time and communication rather than of technical expertise,. He went .on to say that he had not been involved in the development ;of the Ordinance, merely a cursory review. He concluded by saying:that he was willing to meet with the Planning Commission to clear up this problem. Agenda Items 6, 7, 11 and 12 were postponed due to the late hour and will be`con- sidered'at'the Regular'-meeting-of April 23. ADJOURNED: 10:50 P. M. City;Recorder ATTEST: Mayor STUDY SESSION MINUTES, APRIL 16, 1969 - Page 4 P RD U ly E e T1 A WEEKLY NEWSLE T TEP VOLUME 2 ISSUE 13 APRIL 12, 1979 HOUS•T_":C'' I,r..lE:-TT--ATTQ I -PILAN. planning, Staff has reviewed the Housing Implementation Plan s with the NPO members in areas 4,5,6,7. NPQ members in areas I,2,and 3 are difficult to interest in the programs and we do not have complete memberships in these areas, _' you knowJ persons in tzese areas who would be interested in serving on an NPO, please have them contact a member of the Planning Department. MSD Ardi `_'Hi:. CAUCUS. The Metropolitan Service District will be host for the Washington County Elected Officials Caucus cn April 25, 1979 at PCC Rock Creek at 7.30 P.M. . The Tigard Budget Committee wi2i. meet at the same time. gsnTlo�__®t�OADS. Staff will meet with the Public Unitlites Commission over the ra�?_xRoad crossing problems in the 72nd and 76th Ave. area. developments have taken'place recently and the state is very concerned over the potential for increased railroad crossinbs. PUMIC ?,ep-r1S. May 20th thru`26th has been designated National Public rTorks ;•leek. Aspecial thanks to the members of Tigardfs Public Works Department. Martha McClennan has completed the arait Performance Evaluation Forms and has distributed them to Department '-leads for review. This is;another step it the Personnel Manual reorganization.. A replacement for Steve West has been, hired and. she will join the Staff next week. DEO, AND ^ - 72N2, AiEINTSRCHANGF. DEQ has notified the Oregon. Department of`Transportation that the; have approved the construction of the 72nd Ave. interchange. We anticirate constnuction within three years.