City Council Packet - 11/04/1974 m._.,.��_ . .� _
��
� .
� .
�. a _
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
STUDY SESSION 'AGENDA
NOVEMBER 4, 1974, 7:30 P.M.
CHARLES F. TIGARD GRADE SCHOOL
ADMINISTRATION OFFICES
1. Plans '& Specs— Jack Park Irrigation
2. Pians & Specs - Shops Building
3. Status Report - Sidewaik/Pathways and Storm Drainage
� m
4. Street L.I.D. Discussions
.9'
(a) City Share Recommendation.
(b) Commercial Street - District boundaries & assessment method.
(c) Hunziker Road -'Reconsideration of Assessment Method.
5. N.P.O. #2 - -Discussion of Pian.
6. N.P.O.. #3 - Discussion of proposed traffic analysis contract & Street
standards study:contract.
7. Noise Control Committee -Selection potential members.
8. Fowler Jr. High School bond issue discussion.
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
STUDY SESSION
NOVEMBER 4, 1974, 7:30 P.M.
CHARLES F. TIGARD GRADE SCHOOL
ADMINISTRATION OFFICES a
MINUTES;
1. 'ROLL CALL: Present: Floyd H. Bergmann, Mayor; Councilmen John E, Cook, :.Ian
Mickelson, Robert C. Moore, Fred A. Anderson, Legal Counsel; Richard
Bolen, Planner; Bruce P.`Clark, .City Administrator; Doris Hartig,
City Recorder; Nick Hiebert, Director of Public Services and
Facilities, Russ Austin, Building,Official.
2. PLANS 6 SPECS - Jack Park Irrigation, Public Works Shop Building
Attorney Anderson stated he had reviewed and.amended specifications. Council
requested specs icatlons be submitted early in the week for their perusal
prior to their next.Council meeting.
...:
3. STATUS REPORT -'Sidewalk/Pathways and Storm Drainage
A. Storm Drainage
City Administrator synopsized the citizen survey coupon returns regarding
' storm drainage and pathways. 77 coupons:indicated storm drainage problems,.
°. and staff is working on other known problem areas. ' Cost estimates to recommendation will be made
salve Problems will be given at a Tater date and
to Council forsolving immediate needs where solution is fairly obvious
. or storm drainage is causing property damage.. -
B. Sidewalk/Pathway Needs
Of the 235 coupons returned, 144 requests were on County jurisdiction roads.
Information has been given to Washington County to establish priorities.
.Majority of the requests received were regarding development of pathways on
art,-rials and school routes.
} 4.. STREET.L.T.D. DISCUSSION
A. City Share Recommendation
Staff and Council. discussed City Administrator's recommendation o`.20%
as City share as general public benefit on any street improvement in excess R
of residential street. Council also discussed the establishment of a street
policy as a guideline for future street projects. Council requested planning
staff submit recommendation for street policy for adopting guidelines. General
concensus of Council was City participation on Commercial and Hunziker Street
L.I.D. be 20% of the total project.
B. Commercial Street
City Administrator requested Council determine the assessment boundaries and
assessment method for street improvement. Estimated cost for the project is
$94,000 for 44 foot wide street with off-street parking. Council discussed
.inclusion of trailer park in assessment boundaries and equitable assessment for -
t. apartments on S.W. Ash and Commercial intersection. Council requested staff
prepare boundaries and suggest assessment method.
C. Hunziker Street
City Administrator summarized previous discussions regarding street improvement..
Since Council tenatively approved assessment method five, two interested proprty
owners had submitted alternative assessment methods. After re-evaluation
e
o£ all proposals, staff recommended new proposal for assessment based on assessed
valuation of property. Fred Fields, from audience, requested Council consider
improvement of S.W. 72nd Avenue Interchange, and stated he would like an
opportunity to discuss with property owners the new formula. Council requested
Mr. Fields to host a meeting of property owners, with City staff attending.
Mr. Fields agreed to call a meeting.
5. NPO #k2= Discussion of Plan,
City staff and Council discussed results of,publichearing regarding park sites,
traffic patterns, realignment of street and rezoning. Council requested Park
Board study NPO plan and propose `alternate;,park sites. City Administrator
suggested Council review NPO-objectives-and at next study session consider
objectives and Park Board recommendation.
6. NPO #t3
City Planner 'stated the contract was the same as used for:NPO #2 with the
fee for this study $1,500. Mr. Buttke also proposed to develop a streets
policy plan based on technical analysis for a fee of $600.; Council and
staff felt street standards could be developed at;staff level at some future
date."
7. Noise Control Committee - Selection of Potential Members
City Administrator submitted list of citizens names who have indicated
an interest in serving the City. The CityAdministrator asked for
authorization to contact individuals in regards to serving on this
committee. Council concurred and requested recommendation be submitted
at the next regular Council'meeting.
8. Fowler "Jr. Nigh School Bond Issue Discussion.
x �
City Administrator synopsized proposal and brought Council up to date on
City's current assets from sewer plant repayment.>. City;Administrator
expressed concern regarding,cost of remodeling, site acquisition, leasing
of excess office space, and operational cost to City upon completi;n. City
Administrator requested Council consider.'going for bond issue inthe near future
as the School District will receive'bids for purchase of property, in
February. Mr. Wilbur Bishop', from audience, suggested that Council determine
public opinion through citizens forum. If public opinion is favorable, the Council
could go to voters for approval. -Concensus'of Council was to prepare cost estimate
and facts regarding purchase and get opinion from citizen's forum.
8. Meeting Adjourned 11.50 P.M.
City Recorder r,
ATTEST:
c
Mayor
4
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 4, 1974 -