City Council Packet - 03/18/1974 AGENDA
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
March 18, 1974
Charles F. Tigard Grade School
Administration office
Study Session
1. Police Department - Enforcement Policies
Presentation by Chief of Police
2.. Pedestrian-Bicycle Pathway Plan
3. Scheduling of Executive Sessions
4. Budget Schedule and "Discussion
5. Garbage Franchise Rate Increase Request - Herb Frank
6. Walnut-Tiedeman - Further Alternatives`
7. Other
}
f
fIGARD ;TTv ;P UW L
CTPOY SESS10" MINUTE"
MAr, a 35, l9 A, MP P,M
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
CH,AQLFS F. rTI,APD SlADE SCHID!
i POLL =LL "i esn :t. Lagar Floyd K. - rr m lmr,
john E. Cook, E0507L Muure, 7rarlysL.
L. Allan Patin n na i
Fred A r or riny AtLorwe,;
Eitv Plawrnr; E r
DOrfs HS r. City PecaTcer;
of hc.L_ic e:vi eti n 'aa ;r
POLICE DEPARTMENT - ENFORCEMENT POLICTFS
(a) ^Dyer oP Police ,dams ur osened s,i ,P,n � Nap _ `.m l
Policies with respect to traFfLc enraracnont and patra�_
division activities an d the malaonment trurcor.
3. PEDESTRIAN-BICYCLE PATM_tAY PLQ
(.a) Council t di u ed pt e
� ntatic by Pedu2trinn/20yrie
Pathway Cum.ii`tP , .as well as nrinrKlew nnd schcdujjnf_:
nF dov2lopment, ry Tusnitcd R> -
aininn signaturen cf 36 c_ tr ,
Resolutinn be Prepared .idol in; .
p•nn
with copy to go �to Washinitun County zommisswnurs
CRAG ?nr StoW 1; Oregon. ,alsoori ,a:
a
b. r4.a,�deci r� County.
4. EXECUTIVE SESSIC, S
(a-) City Attorney discussed ramirinquons apd iimit,tic.,
closed execu i e meptipga. Council t a. uo artioN -: ,
rhodule an CX0Cu .s._ SMKOH, nowevrr did recueot
Attorney to propa L a conFidpatial rl muran m
respect to pending litigation. _
S. BUDGET SCHEDULE AND DiSCUSiIOi.!
(a) City Administrate stated n e schedule has tc en re ,jspei
and the budget will be presented to ae our <v-`_ ,r
on Tuesday, April 9, )_9;,: _
G. GARBAGE FRANCHISE NATE I NCNEASE REGUEST - her" From<
(a) City Administrator „crated he hat rcuu- 0d
fur the rate increase Fron Mr, , _anL ano r n_r ur
Council considered a rote increase,
hLnrirq
be held. No further r action was kc a qt t
pending further _nrorma` cn rrom Mr. Frank.
7. WALNUT-TIEDEMAN - Further FlLu rnativo,.
(a) Director o" Public Uorkc displayed fupthur aitcrnativ,s
regarding.i•ng do rrltpment a! realignment or the intersect,an.
Council and stafr disrussed pro onal.,, ,howev_ or
pursuing the matter furthe=r willwait fur . response From
"ashiratopt
.uri y as to their willingness To participate
in an L.1;0. The 5:h0ol District has indicated they
have budgeted the money and are ready to PrDceed. Council
agreed be withhold any Further action pendinr re,ponce
from Wshington County.
B. OTHER
(a) City Administrator read letter from 007 or
Washin ,ton County regarding proposed ❑ou _/motel
tax. Ifv is adopted ci'c t .u)d srlarr n pn, ,n
_ _
of the receipts i" it also adopts such,;n,)
Council requested City Administrator to testifl , al-
County-public he ._zn ;.
(b) City Administrator discussed m.r_t_, J
aild Mayors which time to l L,
c Flagg o =~' cr Dr r�i_urn
(Scoggicc s Dom) was -di sc,
_ . Ecun„_l .c Le,ra i
take [is :r",;_o'). If, wa Cis , nc,.r,', t rt`-t,
a
and Mayarc oC 0LI: '.icc - ,h. f _r(f
5enc, teal to r,a ,'',` c..
will be' n Tic
3lrd Oil'ip-i' zlt. - ....l;, ;.
(c) City Administrator reported L,i 1:okjric,, 'i
F:;. ;usti:?i has..a^ce13 d t',(:.'..le,) L i::,i) L. i�^ •_'.
acid ui?.3- to- iro_' n :._ PbQt�.. t 1C:
(d) Cou) '.man Moore e ' Ile hnd trf.e.d t t , + :or-
er y n!:iris ra oiu 3' i.f,s r rn c,r
_e„ _ n,
C,c-rt aiir Walnu? i t r a pt, .)qc,_ ver, pr ,)
ares nut`a,
tcj�in unt�.1 ;pr 1, ln' /4.
matter further ?it Lfiat `tmc .
(c) n--'Y .idrntini^tr ter rc, ., c ecl c_i Un at
a seweer. L.I.D. ',' the j iii'_. t ,,
Resolu-1io ; rdcrinr pre _imp n- e r, r. nr,
rlext Cour c.i'. ar;e da
(f) REPAC CUIMMIITEF- C,iuo i r„4,a Uatp.—s ,.cru Ecmmil
,
sl i uld report to C.our,c-;I or P,�,rrii
As ';uunc.i1 apnpinted- th' Canim tie
you !s"Ai thr:ri c)d on pImm;i)v -r.,, i . r i:-: :
ring .,:imm ssidn prIr, „ -jirr.. _ r ciJ
(g) Ch, mlr;rla ii, at.aimcd ?. :sir)' - ,.cu. �.a:I fr i,h
gt
LIF Si•77T e:011 C.t:t '`
t:t;3yi-jLJSU).r
thu
dam _)n [!r. �) �.;n_
i:inuld hr, I a-..)ai. r
ne,, stated hu be
i.ial�Jiiu bui rat:,nr ._ tuw'_c, Lc, tnc. -
a io:, r onuibi', o.. ..1 ,ii e 1-, a,
she ounehzw e c, il_ e Fi r c t i e r k 'da m FL, _
- _ -.
ha pUb11” and a'_SJ re w thU ` OUlE (l,': S o c L,a,,. it ,
l ;reemant to detnrminr l ,ether Late . ..i
liabi'i ty is adequa'�e]-y providear.
(h)_ Carcibaard ano Sa vat,eco I c fate er a s - Ci _
discussed p-op,. srad amer;dnent w .d
de--'ne -oboard aid 5 laCE ,), r9 tF � _ ,^-Ci IT ,..o
i r.ala:. ca lied unc i'_' ac`e ),, .or i?7
Schnid was in v.;olai gun aC i s "rai his. 3 fd j-
Ccunci t au hoz i._a..?c)n to sL7opr-'_1 - _ o Cara c out-
side er his franr..hise area i)y April ). 1:'' C tv dmir:-
istrator rocoinmended i" lir. ;ohmic;:- did or smp).c� r,iti)
the nrdir,anc-e that his ranch, s,c kle revor-d. Dun. _.
concurred with CLt, ;cimi. ...str.ator" rf,cc,;, .:, _ai ,r..
Council dS soused pzoposed zu)c change , er propurt y for
at 11609 S.I1. Paciric f': .hway bci;iy o^cupiad b; tilE
Steak Restauran equest is frern
Urban Residential Dis.rint to a-7 Sing'-- Far,—i'.,,,
and from es-rc (old C-') ,General Ext ns'�c nnrr,r �C
District to C-.'., General Commerrial. Council conr:luded
that only the front portion of propccrty be considered
from county zoning to city zoning, 4lhich a lea.isla :i•,.
Page 2 - Council Study Session - Baron 1-6, 1974
function and that the applicant would have to initi'ata
anotner zone change' n hack portion of the uroporty
which would be handled under the Fasonc gu .Ciel incl
(j) Adjournment 10:35 P.M.
t
ATTEST: i 1
Ila
Payor
{
Page 3 -Council Study Session — lurch 13, 1974