City Council Packet - 02/25/1974 =tGF Dry-
;h• )r.=
l>-
r , r
q i T .0L 77 0Fo
t^?.r)7
.i r.
". 1 LSQLii110:
11 !
fi1 V.,
ll,_ tt. q->.,-
t.0 [guar
15. ' S- `cR�D,0IC;T �)M1 CO`(i,k.i•+,,. F. ��i [.F•Nry r•.,pe .,- pmr>r.r f ) p<.r�t.
(al .1c�.,..^lreszrlatic•z�.cC Oi•dr ^'e•r ,•f'F,bi' ';er+,i, ' 1 i,l)rr
16 ORD1NpNCr No OH? 01er UUX). N' i
APT T11rN '0 M!"o,1. Any" ).
DAIF7�
C cit _
15sCklTI v C \,-feta
19- ePPIF•At. 01 [ a!r v rn5r,
t -que,r hy. c.:,r. •v`.:t z. z c f -' ..r c. + -d
prcperry lc ,d 'tAM SA, 1 .t_� ,n�„),
acrr- 4n1 w,)p I M b. f w s1Qf v 1. Wj inu -r',- ai
emmer•da! :t., rmv, (Im .Lip Jul 1 :at AV, I cu JSI
i„Innrn, C' .�i„ d r .ih n.
(aI, C. r-1.4
rf 1,
-it!.,:Ti
511ff rr
', r,jqucst b�., rh-q, •Wscin r "I -:r.kq fwp +'_'._ ,•h:r:
C•3. C al r r.'.. ,al D!--r_ 1, p , ”
b:ylc�'d i ..,rS:: th _. d it` y 1 ? 1_ r,rr
a^cl cnmpri-,o t , res �y t n0 ca�c
dvrlScl
St,:ff. i?e,vm!^end:rc.t..,
-:! D:...0-,ic-n
%i. W'DTNANCE N-, . '?L -._ AN ^[frith SCE c^ty.;!:"';f �hap�.vr '.,_it rq, 1-!,:[.
t+i�)i !'_ •+
COD7, irOl...yr C lir 110 ,"',I: �T:`. .tip+•.y;ti_
Rv'.-.S E.P!:.ti<; p1+F�`.1..f =•"T;)N4 ry ':yfi' +r.A�'�: '(l:•.(`];' :`t,!'�
AND AU IAOR17!N` 7h'i Ot.....�5[�\ rn ( C-..T;
F'r:. '11't• 11A.i:.. ,)„ .;(
'a? ^m :• ai i; 1 Ci ty 3r.y[i'.
22. 0Y!1 RR bl_',ST%E.SS
2 3. C.!1. 'I0 `U01 ENC !'0[; 7 i 1: b't"TRTNG S Id"d,
l,t;E 2 .. Cf.:' Lrr_
T I 'G A R D C I T Y C 0 U N' f. I L'
REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY `Z5, 1974, 7:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Mayor` Floyd'H. Be.-qma^^; Cct--Ici1-en 'Jnr,, C ,look,
Robert C. Moore, Charles L. Herron,, J:. Allan Parc c- icy
Attorney 'Fred 'Anderson; R.6. Adams, Chi=_f of`Pa1:r.,c,
WinslowC. Brooks, City Planner. '8:uce'P' Clark, t.ity
Administrator; Doris Harti:g City Reccrderr..ir.k
Director of-Public Sgrvicz and Fac_14t-o
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - February 6, 11, & -183 1974
(a) Approved as st:Cmitt-ed'
3. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE
(a) Correspondence distributed by League of 'Oregc^
(b) Letter from Michael and Lucy Mayernik
4. APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES & INVESTMENTS 56.228.63
(a) Motion to approve: Councilman Cock: -econded by ;;ou�-,c_i. an Mocrs.
Approved,by unanimcu ,ote of Council.
5. 'MONTHLY REPORTS
(a) Motion to accept: Councilman Nortcn: seccnded' by Councilman Patersc
Approved by unanimous vote of Ccu ncil
6. RESOLUTION No. 74-13 RESOLUTION OF' CITY COUNCIL ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF
TRIPLE' MAJORITY ANNEXATION AND RECOMMEND FORWARDING
TO'PORTLAND-METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT
BOUNDARY;COMMISSION (S.W. Katherina Street Area)
( , Motion to adopt: Councilman Cook; seconded by Councilman Norton.
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
7. RESOLUTION No. 74-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL BAKING
APPOINTMENTS AND ESTABLISHING TERMS OF OFFICE FOR
ALTERNATIVE POSITIONS ON THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD.
(a) City Administrator recommerded Planning Commission position be left
vacant and resolution be adoptsd as presented. Planning Commission
will make recommendation for alternate positicn at a later date.
(b) Motion to adopt: Councilman Norton; seconded by Cour:ci.lman Paterson..
Approved by unanimous vote of Council,
B. RESOLUTION No. 74-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL CONFIRMING
EXISTING APPOINTMENTS AND MAKING APPOINTMENTS AND
ESTABLISHING TERMS OF OFFICE FOR THE BUILDING CODE
BOARD OF APPEALS.
(a) Motion to adopt Councilman Norton; seconded by Councilman Moore.
Aoprcveo by Unanimous vote of C =,;i(i.
,av
9. RESOLUT--ION No, 74-16 A RESOLUtJON OF r'HE 1'IGARD E I!rY fOUNE:IE. MAKING
APPOINTMENTS fO THE 6U0G1,1 CDIYEriiiTEt
(a) Motion to adopt. Ccs c:lrr'ar Cook, iorr it L.;,r;ci11_Tan
Norton `
AFr,rovad by u€?cnimrc vote -f s ,. J il_'
10,. O,L.0 C. LIQUOR LICENSE APPI TLi;"[Of,,' H 1 0. _r:.r r t ,
Toun Tavern,' 12370 S.W. Main 5t. teci y C 1 1 ,in.. .rr
a RMB License,
(a) Chief of Poli(:E, _.tated o,,l , )ecal „r r _.,, ,r)n for
renewal of
(b) Motion by Council. rllje,r-, Eryt ,at 1t,i tv Era-
abject i c?a to ren Lal Cf Iic „:; r0,: ;rril
Norton,
Q Approved by u, animoi- _ct= of ioLr, :l.
I1. O.L.C.C. LIQUOR LICENSE APP! IC.ATION - Caffer 's ?i)1 T }'laza;
operated by, 3ame5F.3ck, Kay Pernell and B1 11 L-/"a ,'yrng Pct;
a RMB license.
(a) Chief of Pclire rep _'...d Pc-,l j, D=car Lm nt h ,.a
for renewal ef lic nse,
(b) MotloE by l:0ur': tl 3r_, ,<r :tur that at thi. Lil : i:y [,ad n.-)
objections to 'r..n _r;i +r l.i . ee; e cited=ri t.ji,ciIia ri
Cec+kx
Apo roved by wn_C,ri, „o!" of La;rnc =1.
12. O.L.C.C� LIQUOR LICENSE A POL]E'ATION - I' L r od e c Mary i , 12-30
S.W. Main St. operated by l.cur, -L, Cirod, ap'71ying fcr a P.l 1_'cense.
;(a) Chief of Police reported Police D,?rPart-ent had no objections
for renewal of license:
(b) Motion by Counci.lrn,an M..,,c tie city has no objection to
renewal of license; seccnd,,d by Councl.lr^an Ccok,
Approved by unanimorra iota of Co.:nc;il.,
13. SEWER DEDICATION COMPLIANCE: AGREEMENT -- Cooper Development Corpor-
ation, S.W. Murdock Street
Director of Public Servic :;; & facilities re;hewed Con.cer 0evF,.l-
opment project and reported Unified S,�w .rag« Aggenc.y r,a::� ret;irested
some changes and the pros .ed ompli.ance agreement: wh.ic-h would
bring this in line with lJ S E,. requirements, City Attorney �3tat.ed
he would like to review *prior to giving an opinion,, Louncilman
Norton suggested Council await City Attorney's report. before taking
any action. -
(a) Motion by Councilman Cook to table to March tl rneeti.ng;
seconded by Councilman Norton,
Approved by unani.mor:S vote Of cunc 1.
Page 2 - COUNt'11-
ORDII AA`CES uU. 7"-1:, AN Cf 0IrjF .t r 1C T:iDT,
RECT iU r,, :, z �a;:fit IF A T10N Eli rlltiHACT
MAYERN,,,iK ijot' A iR„I='% , Rof” R Sir Ie
Fa
j 1i yr-� fpre-
FD
at i.,_1 tti rt l 1 3 n rat
Liz r Ji st1 At t
i X f9Af' 7
F'TxrrtEF , ill 0Art
(a) City Ad,
anr,z �,� tt r flirt cd
(b)'. M tG r,i
"arP�t
AFcr �❑ tzy 1
15t ASH AVE: - DOW"!'OWN (_AND II„ <c-i
(a) Public Heai,.t .a rCf t rj
Synopsiane rt�g. g r r, .;}, t. ltr
Bolen Slio
.:L -3,_. t., 1� i�vf , al ."clan
vas also pre,_r,ted b
W.1.t t;en Teatt.ir^y d t
It, Harold Sct ,zdt, 463,5-S W Hi 71 =:W Ct
Steve & Gwen t r s ? 2.5 , W n
S c r P1! #,
f
Ruth h1 5a+,f7 r Jo`5 7 �, lJ f + = ` #r
Garry Reynold._, 100-,F 9:t d.r t . C t _..r >r i„to
thoroughfare
R.D, BF d ,(Se 5 Jil ,t LI A `: 44 ti
Jon BennFtt, 1146 5,J. 9,, r (1 _ed AirF, ,L4
Jerry Mc8ar. 13 1 15 �W, A.ti Dr C.. �
Petition cot _: e' t A?
#mss
alp. f'7 ;_ 7 atf �:
Add.tticnal petzc.rot Alt
In
;tai
i�. � _ „} t .
alt. -#8 r
Verbal Testimony
Mr, Galvin, favored Alt, 44
Atty John Otting, 12210 5,u. AIU"rts testified for IS
residents favored Alt: #3
John Hecktor of D,E.Q No.- Frrltral Dept, commended
decrease traf f i.t ,.tclfim A h Ave :already exreeds noise
level
Don Feller, t" r ct" fdf-'O cn:„ �r,dad adeptic, cF NPO Klan
Cliff Ashley, r :Crm.a , iNPO test.ifled for adcptioa cf NPO
plan
Ken Linsey, Ash Dri, fa c}red Alt, #8
Craig Coles, V111890 1 Drive. zga t Asci A,,; -irS.dge
R,D. Bendixsen, 1335ri 5UA4ti Fa,mred A7 t. 8
Steve Fouste, A3h A% ;i+:. c, ,ted Alt, #6 #
Gerry MCCC!,llough, ci.scu ,+ + ire arvelop_
ment impact
Stan Wright. S.W„ F F,,;.i.ng St. Favored ,.tied Alt #9
Chief of Police R,H, Adam.i favored montF :,i alt. ##B
Betty Parker, 9675 S.L1, Frei+..ng, favored 41t. #8
Rod Bristol, 5,W. 07Mar.a Sr p;2_rted ccT'> .nat;ion
#41 & 8 of Alt,.
Mr, Parker, favored Ef3m,ji_ned Alt.- #4 & B
Page 3 GOUN1, t f.J..
MEN
Mayor Ee. ylor from LwDve i
.
and nw< ari >, ;.r ,c,.
E preferred ,, i
25 preferved 'sire , y+. In
Public>Hearing Closed
Council adjourr-o at. l°45 1r-c f _ L.M,
(b) CoWnilmar CJHtM mw,Pd "t;'
session; n by i Own
AP p 1i7 v eci by Cf
16. STREET VACATION - 3,0 690h KvnO�-
(a) Punl c Hearing 9.n0 n M'
-City Admini atnr-. Qrd all t _ .o ,ar«
unabl to tt 1jqUgyr, 0 i, n, cq
to next regular Ppb
(b) 'Mot.ir by Ce l- 0 & ar t
March�'lith;_ d, y
Appy,ped by ,t
17. APPEAL. OF PLANNING CO M � n t K U
A request;by Harley Dav id nn or P._•i r d to sliou retail motor-
cycle and motorcycle ac.ceavory sales in a --3, General Commercial.
zone. Subject property located at 11645 ,.W, pacific Highways-
The site comprising 46 acres and occumed hs one single Pami
dwelling and one 5000 square fent tial. structurk (Tax'
Map1S1 3500, Tax Lot 800 A-1 ar d 900). Planning t.c. mis.non
approved request with condition*u
(a) Public Hearing 8:00 130,
Planning Staff g v:_ findings and showed slides of site under
consideration. Planning ic , i.;_ cn had approved Gad'ticnal
use with conditions and applican, was appealing rendition
"e" which states: "That tris ap.roval be granted for a one
year period, to be reviewed ewed at the end of that time by the
Planning Commission".
Those who testi. led.
Fred Young, 610 S.W. Broadway, agent for applicant
Paul Warner
Tom Fall, 900 S,W, 5th Avenue, representing Paul Warner
Council and staff arc=5 examined proponenk,
Public Hearing Closed
Page 4 - COUNCIL MEETING - r truary 197
(b) Motion by Councilman Paterson the restriction "e' be re-
moved; seconded by,Councilman Norton,
Approved by unanimous vote of Council."
Council requested City Attorney to write memorandum rA-
garding procedureinrelation to planning comm03sion,
planning staff and City Council.
18. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ',Zone Change ZC 1-74
A request by Robert Aungier to change existing Cuunty ze•rnng from
RU-4 Urban Residential District and B-2, Community Retail Com-
mercial District to a city C-3, General Commercial District.
Applicant proposes construction of a ,baked foods thrift '.store.
The site is located at 13735 S,W. Pacific Highway and comprises of
.95 acres, (Tax Map 251' 3DO, Tax Lot 400), Applicant denied
by Planning Commission,
(a) Public Hearing 8100 P.M.
Staff findings given by City Planner
Those who testified:
Bob Aungier, ,;11302-S.W. Barber Blvd representing pro-perty
owner, Petition signed by 13 neighbors in residential area
to west of property;who said they had no objection
Two daughters of property 'owner-Michael Serres
Council and staff cross examined proponent
Public Hearing Closed
(b) Motion by Councilman Norton to hold matter, over to study
session, seconded by Councilman Cook_
Approved by unanimous decision of Council,
19, ORDINANCE No. 74-17 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING Chapter' 16.32 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE, ABOLISHING BOARD OF SIGN
APPEALS, TRANSFERRING APPEAL 'FUNCTION TO THE
PLANNING COM MISSI^N AND AUTHORIZING THE
COMMISSION TO 50 ACT, PRESCRIBING EFFECTIVE
DATE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
(a) Motion to adopt: Councilman Cook; seconded by Councilman
Norton,
Approved by unanimous vote of Council,
20. ORDINANCE No. 74-18 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 16 (i) OF
ORDINANCE NO 73-33 PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR
TRAFFIC OFFENSES FOR WHICH A SPECIFIC PENALTY
IS NOT OTHERWISE PRESCRIBED, FIXING AN EF-
FECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
(a) City Attorney reported proposed ordinance would correct
an error in a previous ordinance and Proper codification could
be completed.
Page 5 - COUNCIL MEETING - February 2S, 1974
(b.) Motion to adopt: Councilman Moore; seconded by Councilman
Cook.
Approved by unanimous vote of Ccuncii
21. OTHER BUSINESS
Aa City Administrator stated Czty of Beaverton ')ac- scheduled
breakfast meeting for 7:30 A.M. Fr day, Ma.�h 1..:t to d..
gas tax levy and proposed road tpvy.> City .Adm c_utrato:
also reported to Council `ie Lgjjl be out of town MJTrn
through9th to attend the N-W C(ty Manager7, onfere .P.
Adjournment 11;30 P.M„
Gif.y Ftec._tdet 1
ATTES /
Mayor-
Page 6 - COUNCIL MEETING - February 25, 1974
BILLS PRESENTED FOR PAYMENT
FEBRUARY, 25, 1974
GENERAL FUND - U. S. NATIONAL BANK
Check No.
14257 Roger Thomssen, recording 1222'00
14258 postmaster, postage meter 183 150.00
14299r Celia H. Leeman, Trustee, payroll deduction (606) 100.00
U. S. District Court
14300 Lea ue of Oregon Cities, Blue Cross (10) 86.44
11� 12.09 (12) 12.09 (15) 12.09 (16) 283.50
R641.53
16.2) ,26.21 (19) 52.42 (615) 156.69
14301 Petty Cash, lunches, office supplies, etc.
(10) 8.56 (12) 3.10 (13) 4.50 (14) 5.60 (16) 47.90 62,41
18 12,75
14302 League of Oregon Cities, Kaiser (12) 89.98 (13)
32.09 14 64,is S16 177.03 (16.2) 49.46 (16.3) 906.57
16.58 173 24.73 `193 56.82 (616) 195.60
14303 Lea us of Ore on Cities, insurance benefits
2.20 (11� .55 (12) 2.75 (13) .55 (14) 1.10
16 11.00 (16.2) 1.65 (16:3) .55 (19) 2.20 23.65
17) '.55 (15) .55
14305 Oregon Admin. Co., payroll deduction (619) 39.38
14306 League of Oregon Cities, salary continuation (11)
3.64-(12) 24,62 (13) 2.99 (14) 17.04 ('15) 5.11
16 90.20 (16.2) 16.64 (16.3) 5.74 (17) 4.41 196.11P
193 25.72
14308 A Incorporated Insurance Assoc., fidelity bond (18) 194.Q0
14309 Anderson & Dittman, `Professional' Services (Jan) 656.00
(11) '105.00 (18) 551.00
14310 Business Equipment Bureau, Paper & Equip. Rental
R10 45.74 11) 1:.51' (12) 27.33 (13) 7.34 (14) 38.44
163 61.16 16.2) 1.51 (19) 10.90 193.93
14311 Carl Buttke, Engineer Services (Traffic Plan) (14) 100.00
14312 Cake Company, 9-1 Speaker (16.3) 63.17
14313 Cascade Microfilm, Prints of Maps (19) 25.00
14314 Communication Enterprizes of Oregon, Base Repair (16) 28.00
14315 National Recreation & Park Assoc., Subscription 10.00
Renewal (17)
34316 Lanson - Tremaine, Books (15) 185.74
14317 Newberg-Interior-Sherwood, Carpet (18) 1259.50
14318 Manpower, Mary Ann Richey-employee (13) 179.20
14319 Par as, Repair damaged propane pump - Rental (16) 56.06
(12� 5.00 61.06
14320 Prentice Hall, Inc., Publications (16) 13.15
14321 Rodda Paint - paint (18) 12.42
14322 Supt of Documents Catalog (16) B.BO
14323 Times Publication Zone Change Publication (12) 7.63
14324 United Alloys Inc. :- Rods (20) 137.55
14325 Valley Petroleum - Bottled Oxygen (20) 5.90
14326 Washington County Communication (16) 304.93;
Repair Police Communication Units (16.2) 33..14
(16.3) 82:50 420.57
14327 Sears - Vac Cleaner (16) , 54.95
Total $5578.22
ASSESSMENT FUND- U.S. NATIONAL BANK
2623 First National Bank - Coupon Interest (5) 201.25)
2624 First 'National Bank - Coupon Interest- (6) 57.50
Total $258.75
SEWER FUND - U.S. NATIONAL BANK
14300 League of Ore. Cities —Blue Cross (103) 21.93
(616) 9.84);' 31.77
14303 League of Ore Cities - Insurance Benefits (103) .55
14305 Oregon Admin. Co. - Payroll Deduction (619)_ .91
14306 League of Ore. Cities - Salary Continuation (105)- 5.64
Total $38.87
STATE TAX STREET - U.S. NATIONAL BANK
14300 League of Ore. Cities - Blue Cross (103) 26.21
(616) 14.13 40.34
14302 League of Ore. Cities - Kaiser(103) 64.18
(616) 31.00 95.18
14303 League of Oregon Cities Insurance Benefits (103) 1.65
14305 Oregon Admin. Co. (619) 3.02
14306 League of Ore. Cities - Salary Continuation (105) 14.90
14319 Pargas - Rental (210) 15.00
2628 Peerless Pacific - 2" Pipe Galvanized 21' long (220) 182.70_
$352.79
Checks issued for expense - $6228.63
-2-
S i
S.
FINA14CIAL STATE MT
REVEf:UE.S
Date January 31, 1974
1973/74 CURRE14T YEAR TO
GEi.''RAL•FUND BUDGET MONTH DATE
Cash on Hand 7/1/73 0130,541. -0- 181,135.'
701 . Property Tax-Current 232,728. -0- 198,482.
702• Property Tax-Prior Years 8,019. "-0- 11,534.+
703 hand Sales &`Advance Taxes 160. -0- 00.
704 Trailer Sales Tax 180. -0- 9."
REVENUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES ';
712 Cigarette Tax 19 848. -0- 11,053.
713 Liquor Tax 50,279. 19,251. 43,252.
717 State Subvention - BOR 42,613. -0- -0-
717 State Subvention - PEP 14,630. 804., 11,923.'
718 County Subvention - USA 28,162. -0- 28,163.
718A County Subvention -'RIDE 39,023.' 5,096. 13,369.
718B County Subvention LEAA 14,012. 3,090. 5,010.
LICENSES & PERMITS
721 Business 28,309. 329. 27,458.
722' Liquor 150. 10. 30.
723' Bicycle 175. , -0- 36.
724 Plumbing & Heating 13,320. 650. 4,531.
726 Building 33,022. 1,844. 29,003.
727 Moving 50. -0- 5.
728 Street Openings 250. -0- -0-
729 Sign 545. 2. 298..
FIP.°ES R FORFEITURES
731&734 Court &:Indigent Defendants Dcf. 52,000. 2,801. 24,721.
USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
742 Telephone Pay Booth 35. 3. 27.
743 Interest 1,800. 1,461. 3,173.
CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES
750.10 Street Sweeping 2,000. -0- 380.
750.20 Subdivision Application Fee 600. -0- 214.
750.30 Subdivision Lighting Revenue 2,000. -0- 540.
751 Zoning Adjustments 3,000. 450. 1,325.
751.1 Special Police Service 2,425. -0- -0-
751.2 Special Inspection Service 1,087. 102. 162.
752 Document Sales 2,000. -0- 511.
755 P. W. Construction Feee 6,000. -0- 1,206.
756 Lien Check 1,200. 62. 484.
757 Sale of Street Signs 750. 25. 235.
758 Library Fines & Fees 1,200. 121. 834.
FRAVCHISE REVENUE
761 P.G.E. 39,699. -0- 16,731.
762 N.W. Natural Gas 8,978. -0- 6,727.
763 General Telephone 18,142. -0- 8,664.
764 Garbage 5,710. 192 2,661.
766 Taxi 90. -0- 60.
767 Pacific Northwest Bell 100. -0- -0-
i
?PORI-REVENUE RECEIPTS 1973/74 CURRENT YEAR T
BUDGET MONTH DATE
771 Sale of City Property 2,800. -0- .
3,806
775 Unclaimed Property Sale 100. -0' 06.
776 Donation - Library 1,000. 25B.
776.1 Donation - Library Building` 1,000. _0- 278.
777 Park Development & Maintenance 57.
5.000. -0- 210.
F^COVERED EXPENDITURES k
783 Admin. Sewer & Road 10,000, -0- 10,000.
785 Gas Tax Refund 600. -0- 755.
787 Nuisance Abatement 100, =0- -0-
787.1 Demolition of Building
788 Other 2000. -0- 10.
2,000. 203. 5,892.
77ggggT' gt ' Improvement S.W..115th 57,000. -0_ -0_ t
School District-Vehicle Maint -0- -0-
786 Reimburse Voters Registration - 20.
TOTAL GENERAL FUND _3 -0_ 18.
1886,432. $36,754. $654,992.
SELER FUND
Available Cash 7/1/73 6180,295.
175,783. t
USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
743 Interest 7,500. 266.
747 OEA & Others (Need Project) 4.442-
50,000, -0- -0-
CHJRGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES 3- 34.
753 Sewer Connection Fee 40,000, 720. 23,
7-F4 Monthly Sewer Service 534•
5 Sewer Permit & Inspection 43.300. 6,838„ 22,775.
3.300. _66. -2,775.
RECOVERED EXPENDITURES
788 Other 300. -0- 290.
789 Unbonded Assessment 289. 17. 110.
TOTAL SEWER FUND s
$327,665. $7,910. $234,526.
STATE TAX STREET FUND
Available Cash 7/1/73 40,000. 63,196.
REVENUE FROM OTHER AGENCIES
711 State Gas Tax 94,350. -0- 45,764.
USE OF MONEY& PROPERTY
743 Interest 1.367. 470.
1,052.
i
TOTAL STATE TAX STREET FUND $135,717. $470.
$110,012.
:... ROAD FUND
Available Cash 7/1/73 1,618. -0- 3,043.
714 County Road Tax 1,000. -0- 125.
743 Interest 25. -0-
7.
TOTAL ROAD FUND 3 2.643. $-0 $3,175.
IHis -0111 MM
1973/74 CURRENT YEAR TO
FEDERAL REVENUESHARING FUND BUDGET MONTH DAA
Available Cash 7/1/73 3 72,556. 77.383.
715 Federal Subventions 66,780. 17,871. 52;437.
743 Interest 500. 00. 2,280.
TOTAL FED. REVENUE SHARING FUND 8139,836. $17,871. $132,100. I�{
BANCROFT BONDS
Assessments 32,000. 1,774. 10,326.
Interest 10,979. 738. 4,166.
USE OF MONEY
743 Interest on Investments 1,000. 1,200, 3,850. EF
TOTAL BANCROFT BONDS $43,979. $3,712. $18,342. t
GENERAL OBLIGATION'BONDS
Available Cash 7/1/73 $ 15,374. 4,923.
Cash from USA 25,926. 24,910.
747 Interest on Investments 100. 111. 376.
T1,TAL OBLIGATION BONDS $ 41,400. $111. $30,209.
(EE(
t
t
1
i
i
TOTAL BUDGET $1,577.672. $66,828.
$1,183,356.
111,111 MINE
N N to r :tll an 1 0 m.:.
cFd. co N O r' W
d': N ++1 O i M M:
Co: W N v co :. N 10 co
W 4-1
r v 1n .-1 1 r 1
+a O.. IT Ol .d. CO <I' .-1 N --r
O Sy` O Ifl vl O - O O
e-1 M 00 N d' 0) : M It
co r� O O O 11 O O 1 1 1 .
F. 00 +S co r W co N 1 O co
drC14 C)' �:.
'M '.M M p... p
m C-i
a o.< 1 1 O O o..
cl; N N ry
y; l0 N N h :O M 1 i— 0 :
lU 1O M 1' V' N 1� N
H 4-
a) r r ' r m �a ri ri
N "N co M O W W CO CO W
W :+-: :a e
+, m �; o a o C 0 0
N M :(N Ln u) 111
O: 01 O V :Q' Ol ri tt
r. C13
U/ 0 C 10. M 1 N W [r..
r r Ci o o i .a
N (y N _...N
ta
rl O V. O r tll N r
r
(. O N l!l O to 1 11
y m n1 am
b In co r o „o W 'ui
w m
Ln p O N rl N
N N r W N N
M 111 M d' 'n V cf' eel T
W r -Ir 'i r r .-I Cy, r
r cli C v 03
rl
O N N Co r-
em —4 N N N
d' M Ol r 14 r O d' H
r M 0l 0 O O O O O
N O v W M ttl OJ O W u1
e. N In M N W [r e-I N
H Ul W M l/l Ill e-1 r-1 N lfl
O 0 co W N0 N N W O
H W M .d W cr Vl CO It
r M .-1 N r W fl-
fn In r
M +a Ol 'i rNN
to
M
:— EO
C!] Q y O v� N N E
N > H O
H a1 0) 6C iC W O 0 CEIi
H
9g app ptyt p.
Tl
EXPE'ND17TURES J
1973-74 Mo.= January Year to
Budget Current onth Date
GENERAL FUND
Mayor & Council 4,662. 110,06 2,638.45
Municipal Court 19,112. 1,249.67 10,599.27
Administration 68,177. 5,291.62 37,778.18
w.
Building Dept. 31,728. 1,268.29 13,748.22
Planning & Zoning 42,781. 4,604.09 23,064.07
} Library 22,030. 1,778.57 10,414,50
b Police 346,242. -30,683.26 183,261.53
�• 1,165.48 11,551s 24
Parks & Recreation 84,201.
Non-Departmental 132x974. 5,930.94 39,687.25
Engineering 59,642. 4,717.84 31,484.01
Street Operation & Maint. 70,223. 1,163.01 7,527.45
Contingency 4!660. -0- -0-
Total General Fund $886,432. $57,962.83 $371,754.17
SEWERAGE DISPOSAL FUND
era on a n enance 265;933. 2,613.33 19,776.10
Replacement & Expansion 54,383. -0- 4,283.23
Contingency -0- -0-
Total Seger Fund $327,665. $2,613.33 $24,059.33
STATE TAX STREET FUND
era on a n enance 131,31.7. 4,548.16 59,112.53
Contingency 4,400. -0- -0-
Total State Tax St. $135,717. $4,548.16 $59,112.53
ROAD FUND
Up-e—ra-t-fo-n-,& Maintenance $2,643. -0- 1,147.50
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
DEBT FUND-Bancroft Bonds
'x,4,5,6;7.8.9
$43,979. 3,810.66 27,445.62
GENERAL DEBT FUND
enerabliFaTfon Bonds $41,400. 1,537.08 13,730.83
FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING
$139,836. 16,795,14 54,504.45
TOTAL BUDGET $1,577,672. $87,267.20 $551,754.43
i All
a
`S it
January 28, 1974
MEMORANDUM
To: ` City Council
From: Planning Department
Subject: Monthly Report _ for the month of January
Zoning & Subdivision Administration
For the month of;January, the Planning Commission considered the following items;
Zone Changes 1
Conditional Uses 1:
Temporary Use 0
Variances 0
Preliminary Plats 0
Subdivision Standards Variance 0
Site uevelopment 'Plan Review 0
Miscellaneous 2
Ordinance Revision 0
One regular meeting and one study session were' held 'i.n Januarv. February will
see:a return to the Commission's regular 3 meetings;per month schedule.
Because of recent annexations, the City has acquired large blocks of county zoning.
The staff proposes to initiate zoning action through the Planning Commission so
that these areas may be brought into conformance with City zoning. This process
will begin with the Planning Commission hearing on February 19th.
Neighborhood Planning
The Planning Commission & NPO 3#1 held a joint meeting on January 22nd to
discuss the Buttke Traffic Circulation recommendations. These groups have
issued a joint recommendation involving the lowering of residential density
adjacent Fanno Creek, the relocation and enlargement of the O'Mara Park site
and the support of Traffic Circulation Alternative i#4.
This recommendation will be presented to the Council at the February 4th Study
Session.
NPO #2 is progressing with the definition of neighborhood problems and related
policy for residential, commercial and industrial uses. The committee will
consider problems and policy related to transportation and parks during the next
month. Also during the next month, the staff will begin to develop a "scope
of services" necessary to define the work program for a traffic consultant.
The staff hopes to avoid the traffic related problems that occured with the first
neighborhood planning effort by retaining a traffic consultant for each successive
neighborhood plan.
Planning Department Memo. -2- January 28, 1974
Downtown Redevelopment Plan
Schematic Main Street design proposals will be presented to RE-PAC an February
lst at Floyd's Restaurant by University of Oregon Planning assistants. - The
Council is invited to attend.
The staffchecked with the State' Local: Governmental Relations Division to ascertain
the status of our $9,000.00, "701" Planning grant. We were told by Alan
Hedburg, of that division, that "'701" appropriations have been held 'up in
Congress because of the Watergate hearings. The State "701" review process has
not begun, consequently, the staff will continue to monitor the progress of our
grant application.
Ordinance Revisions
We recently acquired'a new planning intern, Steve -Cartmili, from Portland
State University°s "Urban Studies Program". He has been'assigned the task
of drafting a proposed Flood Plain & Fill Ordinance. The recent floodings
illustrates the urgency for this ordinance. The staff will have a draft
of this document for Council consideration the beginning of March.
Special Projects
With the end of the holiday season, the Planning Commission has again begun to
work on "Planning Commission Procedures" and "Street & Road Policy".' It is
anticipated that substantial progress will be made on these items during the
month of February. Adoption ofappropriate documents should be completed by the
end of March, '
Because of several problems contained in our existing Sign Code, the staff
has embarked on proposed revisions related to Bench Signs, Directional Signs,
Industrial Park Identification and Planned Development District interface. The
Planning Commission should finish consideration of these items by the end
of February, thus placing them before the Council during March for consideration.
February 18,'1974
MEMORANDUM
To: City Council
From: Planning Commission
I
Subject: Street Vacation: S.W. 69th Avenue between S.W. °Hampton Street
and S.W. Irving Street.
The Planning Commission, at its regular meeting of December 18,; 1973, took 'action
to recommend the vacation of the above described street subject to the following
condition:
Ten feet ;of S.W.. 69th Avenue, adjacent S.W. Hampton Street
should not be vacated in order to provide for the future
right-of-way needs for an improved S.W. Hampton Street.
1
6 � 1HHL
- �
nvw==—jJ
....;: �_ r^t:a r•r �•a.�1"!r r¢.�.-- t—i * 7—L_-'`�:.rs'�w.-.,. = s0.*.,.,,,�;'•�. •`k �zv1 � �
§�.`�, g� � + c
4Y
d4a r 'L•?y, �,.o s 3/..0
AMLU
cr
1••L•.. �v,� .. :_�' �5.�r a_2 z r"�iz.� _a�'�,�cS•p ��� r'a C� '<+ � v.. F -
es� a r—a1c�Dada ��v'��.�...-aaum eras ®rts� -�cex7 vS 21�'t'S'n rt`F
,cP�Sz4 r k '
F {)y
r = ` 0z' a k
x ' '
LL a E
�l � -
A oa
3LU
¢ i.
z °t C w cn¢ O o
4T1 N 2 x w ¢w
wa as
��� '"•'�1� "`� `gip _ m� .� � O f
cc
8< a� >
� �w Q w w J
W CL W J J 0
J µf ¢w a X cc2
� s11
0
Lo
�.. w CD J
C) LLJ
wz =
Ir C11
Cn W U .�
31,
s
m
17 80 O
• 2700 25' 25' 52600 19 O
ISO so' i
5' 2 5' 6 0'
Fid
-0
, O O
O J O
o a 1 � � 900
a
O l
a
1600
15 29 n m ZOOO
2.601 N T2800 N 1500
1000
2900 N I40O
- z 2100 1100
o -- 2200
� z N
a "
23001300
12 0 0
N b
STT TI
0 250 21400 f '!
SEE MAP \ J t .S. 12174) �-r! I o Wd or
2s 1
� Y W
25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 28' 25' 25' H
25 25'1125' 25' 25' 25� 25' 330
_
3c �I�,�25I
a \ o ( - of ` 2 3 (4 15 16 17 IB o 0
- 111
iLja 36
— 10 n Ip 35 _ — -
- II 34
12 33
13 _32 N
— 14 31 3400N
\ N
9 � 15 30
f 16J 29
a 17 28 N N
N 18 27 N' 3500,,
9TTT1 � h TTTJ
a ( 0 19 20121 122123 2412512666
• I I ( — 1—
IA 25 $'9�
.ji////� ���//.. ..
91 o '�
B. Mickelson Roved to interpret th= requested
motorcycle sales store as a conditional
use. Hartman seconded and the vote Was
unanimous.
10.3 Discussion of a request by the Murray-McCormick
Environmental Group to consider "major appliance
and furniture assembly, warehousing and retail
sales where the majority of apaceutilization is
for warehousing and assembly" as a conditional
use in an M-4, Industrial Park zone.
y _ 1._ Staff Findings
A. Brooks presented the staff findings and
;informed the Planning Commission that thio was
a matter of discussion at this time and that
no staff recomi =cdation was prepared.
2. Commission Discussion and Action
A. The Commissioners, after discussing the
request, `agreed that a 'major aspect of a
furniture business is storage or warehousing
of merchandise. A oasi.s was therefore recognized
for considering a furniture store as a "condition-
al use in an M-4, Industrial Park zone in that
warehousing is-presently- a conditional use in
this zone.
B. Hartman moved to instruct the c.taff to draw
up an ordinance amendment to include a j
furniture store as a conditional use in i
an M-4 zone. Barkhust seconded and the motion
passed by unanimous vote.
i
10.4 Vacation of S.W. 69th south of Hampton
i
1. Staff Findings and Recommendation i
A. Brooks presented the staff findings and
recommendation for approval.
2. Commission Discussion and Action
A. Hartman moved to recommend approval of
the dedication request to the City Council.
Sakata seconded and the motion passed by
unanimous vote.
ADJOURNMENT: 11;02 P.M.
i
Page 10 12-18-73 - PC Minutes
r
TIGARD ,PLANNING COMMISSION F
Staff Report
i
Miscellaneous
December 18,i 1973
fI
9.5 Street Vacation: S.W. 69th Avenue between S.W.
Hampton Street and the vacated 'S W "Irvi �
Staff Findings
1._ The Tigard Triangle Qeyelooment Plan indicates
a pattern of "super-blocks" that will be created j
by ,vacating unneeded segments of existing, dedicated
street right-of-Way. These super-blocks Will
permit the consolidation ofrland -holdings into
parcels that will accomodate large office developments.
The Lamb-Weston site is an example of an area where
a section of unneeded right-of-Way has already
been vacated.
2. The subject street vacation as requested by
Lincoln Properties Inc., the adjacent property
owner, is also supported by Lamb-Weston Inc. , who
is the other adjacent property owner.
3. The previous vacation of S.W. Irving Street has
prevented the continuation of S.W. 69th Ave. ,
south into the Farmer's Insurance Property.
4. Previous Planning Commission approval of the
Farmer's Insurance Group preliminary development
plan and program did not anticipate the extension
of S.W. 69th Ave. into the Farmer's site.
5. Access into the Farmer's Insurance site will be
adequate when S.W. 68th Avenue is improved.
S.W. 66th Avenue currently provides access to the
Farmer's Insurance site. S.W. 68th Ave. is the
street most logically located to provide access to the
Farmer's Insurance site.
6. The Tigard Triangle Development Plan indicates a
vacated S.W. 69th Avenue between S.W. Hampton
Street and the vacated S.W. Irving Street, thus,
the vacation request conforms to the Tigard Triangle
Development Plan
Staff Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommend to the City Council
the vacation of S.W. 69th Avenue between S.W. Hampton
Street and the vacated S.W. Irving. Ten feet of S.W. 69th
Avenue adjacent S.W. Hampton Street should not be vacated
in order to provide for the future right-of-way needs for
an_ improved S.W. Ham ton Street.
--------------
r
February 18, 1974 j
MEMORANDUM
To: City Council
From: Planning Commission
Subject: Recommendation to Council concernin r
U 1-74s a request bHarl
Davidson of Portland to allow retail motorcycle-accessoryy salesein
a C-3, General Commercial zone.
The Planning Commission at its January 15, 1974 public hearing took action recommending
to the City Council the above described conditional use be approved with certain
conditions. Those conditions
are described as follows:
a That there will be no servicing of vehicles on the premises.
b. That there will be no test riding of vehicles to be sold, on the premises.
C. That the vehicles not be used within the building in any way.
enter and exit- from the sidewalk adjacent to Pacific Highway.
d. That outside display and access be restricted so that motorcycles do not
e. : That this approval be granted fora one year period, to be reviewed at
the end of that time by the Planning Commission.
Please note that the appropriate staff report and meeting minutes are attached for E'
reference.
Conditional Use
E
ca
i
4
.; : How, i
c
Q
s
Spy
imew-►IAG
5. PUBLIC HEAR11"G - Conditional Use
5,1 Conditional UTo-,e - CU 1-74
A request by Harley-Davidson of Portland to allcm `r-.`pail motorcycle &
motocyclP accessory sales in a C-3, General Coamercial tone. Subject
property located at 11845 S.W. Pacific Highway. The site ctmprising
.46 acres and occupied by one single family dwelling and one 5000 square
foot commercial structure. (Tax slap 1S1 35DD, Tax Lots 800 A-1 & 800). ,
A. Staff Findings. j
1. Brooks presented the staff lindi=igs relevant to this case.
B. Testimony & Cross Examinatietl
1. Proponent
a. Dick Roberts, ; the applicant's a.tt r_ey, preseet-ed the proposal
and responded to the Fasano guideli.aes. He pointed cut that the
Fasano guideline does not apply referring ,to other lard
available and zoned for the requested use. ; In t_h_is case,
motorcycle sales are not permitted outright in any cne within
the City of Tigard. He also addressed the staff 'f _.dine stat-ing
that the location of a m,:�tr,.,ycle shop would result in conflicting
land use as not correct because ^.thr-rusessuch as service stations
and automobile sales are Ideated in the area.. He also pointed out
that there would be no test riding of vehicles in the City of �
Tigard. This would b dcnc, at the Portland stre. He emphasized
that this store i.s fc 0'",Play purposes -11y a.a,d no tes-t. riding �
or repairs would be con&ucted at this 1t:�cation. �
2. Cross Examiratiori
a. Ball asked Mr. Roberts if he were saying that Faasano requirements do
not apply to conditional uses.
f
b. Mr. Roberts replied that procedurally, yes, Fasano should apply,
but the burden of proof should not include that you show other
available property if the use requested is not allowed outright
in any other zone. p
t
c. Chairman Whittaker asked if the health food store would remain
next to the proposed use.
d. Mr. Roberts replied that the health food stere had a lease and
would remain on the premises,
e. Ball asked if off-street parking were available for the. use.
f.. Fred Young, realtr;r with he=iris & Steve-s, rapped that there
Was no off-street parking for thid, use.
f` g. Bill Stiles, attcrrey for the owner of the health food store,
4 which would be adjacent to the motorcycle store., questioned
the applicant for his.client. He asked if the company would
actually be able to sF11 motorcycles without allowing test
tiding.
4
Page 7 - BC Minutes - 1-15-74
t
h. Mr. Young replied that they could. Motorcycle sales is
different than imagined by many people, and v7,like the stilling
cf an automobile, it is uncoaLmcin tc al.lcw test riding of a
motorcycle.
i. Mr. Stiles then asked if windows would be 'put in the Pacific
Highway side of the building larger than those now in place'.
j. Mr. Young replied that larger display wi-.dcws wciAd be put
on the Pacific Highway .side of` the b i lding.
k. Mr. Stiles asked if vehicles wculd he _:e=_ iced
on the site.
1. Mr. Youngreplied that all servicing w�jld be done at the Union
Avenue store in Portland.
3. Opponents
a. Mr. Stiles stated that his client.S H_-se of Health, 11;pp.lses
the request for the motorcycle shop.
4. Cross EYam;inatio—z
a. Sakata asked Mr. Stiles where people the t�l<-aners
park. at this time.
b. Mr. Stiles said he presumed that the clEa.-i,_°= pat;ions parked on
i
War-per Street because this is the only park-ing available.
C. Staff Rec.omnendation'
1. Mr. Brooks presented his ?.ecommenda.tion that the request be
denied based upon the unsuitability of the proposed use fes the
subject site as stated in st-aff finding number 5 and the fact
that the applicant has not prover, his pr.oposai will not have
an adverse affect on adjacent properties as stated in staff finding
number 7.
2. Hartman asked if Brooks had cc:,nsidered changing his recc-Unendation
based upon the letter which had been submitted stating no test
riding will take p .ace at the location.
3. Brooks stated i/no" his recommendation has not been altered by this
new evidence.
4. Bark-burst stated that the noise coming from this use would
be no greater than from any other C-3 t-se and a. one year
conditional use might be appropriate.
D. Public Hearing Closed,
E. Commission Discussion and Actio
Page B - PC Minutes - 1-15-74
i
1. tzii stated that Mr. Stiles has raised Some valid objectionstothe
location of a,trot:orcycle sales store on this site., but it appears'
that these objections cculd be overcome by the p1'ace_ne^t of conditions
upon approval of the ecaditional use. The c;bjectir,ns relating to noise
appear to have been met by the applicant o s stat_me-'t that no vehicle
maintenance or test..riding Will., take. ,lace from tie sl t— T-herefore,
noise levels should certainly be no grEater than that 7.f any other use
in this zone. Ball then roved to app-rove the conditional use subject toil
the following cr.nditio-.ns.
a. That there will be no servicing <f vehicles o_n t_he prec_iseS.
b. Tha.L there will be no test riding of vehicles to be sold, the
pr+_raises.
C. That the vehicles not be sed within the build
i''ga i.'_' ^Y Way.
d. That outside display and access be estricted so that motorcycles
do not enter and exit from the sidewalk adjacent tai
Pacific Highway.
I
e. That this app--oval be i
p g�ra.x�ted f�a_ a cage year p i��?9 to be
reviewed at the end of that time by the Plan-I! g Cc,;--issicn.
2. The
motion was secc+nded by Barb_h;;•rst and d r�ved:b " r°�
pP y 7.."a- i.-.ou s vote of
thos Commissioners present, .
6. MISCELLANEOUS
6.1 Interpretaticia of Use L A request by Mr. Ric.ha.r•d Paz tc e._==tabli>h a
glazing business ""rpecializia.g an both ccmme--ixl & reRidantial glass
installation --Pd re air` �n C-3 General�
p , Coamercial zcne.
A. Staff Findings
1. Brooks prcsenitFd th1S item g�iOW1"g the t rcation a.rd offering. gind_i ngs
releva*it to the request.
B. Staff Recoaanendation
1. Brooks recon¢-ended that the glass glazing shop be considered a
conditional use in the C-3, General C;-.crzrezcial zone.
3
C. Commission Discussion and Action
1. Hartman moved that a glass gla:.r_ng shop be considered a conditional
use in the C-3, Ger,,:.ral Coro ercial zone.
2; Frasier seconded, and the motion parsed by unanimous vote of those
Commissioners present.
7. ADJOURNMENT 11030 P.M.
f
Page 9 PC Minutes - 1-13-74
1
r
i
i
i
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
January 15, 1974
Agenda 'Item '51
CU 1-74
Conditional Use
For property located at 11845 S.W. Pacific Highway
+ (Tax Map '1S1 '35DD, Tax Lots 800A-1 and 800)
Appicant
Harley-Davidson of Portland
Applicant's Request
To allow retail motorcycle and motorcycle accessory
sales in'"a C-3, General 'Commercial zone.
Applicant's Proposal
To conduct retail sales of motorcycles and
motorcycle accessories from the subject site.
Staff Findings
1. The Planning Commission on December 15, 1973
acted to declare motorcycle and motorcycle
accessory sales, a conditional use in a C-3,
General Commercial zone.
2. Adjacent land use and zoning are as follows:
All adjacent zoning is C-3,- General Commercial
Northeasterly direction,. across S.W. Warner Ave.
Furneral Home
Dentist Office
Multi-family dwelling (4 units)
Northwesterly direction, behind subject property
Single Family Dwelling
lst National' Bank of Oregon
w
Southwesterly direction between subject property
and Hall Blvd.
West Coast Furnishings
Knauss Truck Center-Parking & Vehi'cle 'Display
Southeasterly direction'
S.W. Pacific Highway
3. The Tigard Community Plan designates the subject
site general commercial use and defines said use
as a "range of retail and service commercial
uses that benefit from a highway-oriented location".
The stated use conforms to the Tigard Community Plan.'
4. The proposed use will fulfill a community need for
a motorcycle sales outlet within the Tigard community.
There are, presently no motorcycle- sales outlets
within the Tigard community.
5. The location for the proposed use is not suitable
on the basis of access and egressand on the effect
of said proposed use upon adjacent properties. The
applicant has not stated other locations Were
considered.
The ;staff assumes there will be a need to allow '
potentialbuyers to test-ride motorcycles. This
test-ridinq must, in this location be done on
public rights-of-way; namely S.W. Pacific Highway
and S.W. Warner Avenue. S.W. Pacific Highway,
at this location, carries approximately 26,000
vehicles per day through the Hall Blvd. Pacific
Highway intersection. The section of Pacific
Highway that must be traversed for any test riding
(from Hall Blvd. to Pfaffle St. ) has one of the
highest accident rates of any segment of Pacific
Highway through Tigard. Fifty motor vehicle
accidents were recorded along this particular
highway segment in 1970 as documented by Tigard's
"Traffic Safety Program" a document complied in
1971 for the City by CH2M/Hill traffic consultants
The staff feel that an individual, would not be
testing a vehicle in a relatively safe environment,
but in one of the most dangerous environments in
the City.
In addition any vehicle testing that does not
occur on S.W. Pacific Highway, would be limited to
S.W. Warner Ave. S.W. Warner is a dead-end street
approximately 430 feet long with a 50 foot right-of-way.
Page 2 Staff Report - Harley-Davidson - 1-15-74
Adjacent uses, as stated include a single-family
residence, a four-plex multi-familydwelling a
dentist office, funeral home and a bank parking lot.
The staff feels that vehicle-testing an `S.W. Warner
would not be compatible with adjacentuse's because
Of potential noise conflicts and traffic conflicts '
with traffic utilizing Warner Ave. to reach adjacent
land uses.
6. The applicant has submitted to the staff the
attached answers to the 1PFasanoh gui"delines. The
applicant has also submitted the attached plot and
land use map.
7. The applicant has not ';proven his proposal will
not have an adverse affect ;upon adjacent properties.
The applicant states in his attached submission
"it isnot now apparent that this proposal could
have an adverse impact on the community, the applicant
will cooperate with any reasonable request to lessen
or alleviate such adverse impact.
Staff Recommendation
Denial of the applicant's request upon the basis
of staff findings 5 and 7.
i
Page 3 - Staff Report Harley-Davidson 1-15-74
Commercial Leasing,Sales,and Property Management =.610 S.W.Broadway Portland,Oregon 97205 223-3171
i
k
I\TaEh�
YLeaJtors r
December 21, 1973
City of Tigard Planning Dept. j
12420 S.W. 'Main Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223 -
Attention: Mr. ' Winslow `Brooks
> i
Re: Conditional Use Application - Fasano Requirements
Dear Mr. Brooks :
The following are answers to item #3 as requested in the con-
ditional use application for the city of Tigard.
A. Purpose of our proposed zoning action is to establish"
a retail store for motorcyclesales under the conditional I
'uses allowed in a C-3 zone as per Section 140-2 , City of
Tigard zoning ordinance.
B. This request is in conformance with Tigard's compre-
hensive plan which provides commercial zoning to be
confined to major traffic arterials.
k
C. This conditional use fulfills several specific community
needs• ,
1. Transportation is important to the economic success
of every comunity.
2. Smaller vehicles are replacing the automobile
because of reduced operating costs.
3. The present energy shortage demands the replacement
of the automobile by smaller vehicles whenever possible.
4. Environmental considerations dictate that smaller
motors be used in transportation whenever` possible.
5. Land use is enhanced by lessened off-street parking
z,.
requirements of smaller vehicles.
City of Tigard Planning Dept.
December 21, 1973
Page 2
D. This question does not seem to apply to this conditional
use where one retail or service function is being're-
placed,by another. . All of which is being conducted
wholly within the building on subject property. This is
not a zone change; application.
E. This proposed location is more suitable than other ,
locations zoned for this conditional use because of the
convenience to both Highway 217 and I-5 freeway. This -
allows faster and easier ingress and egress of those
persons seeking to do business with the applicant.
F•- As noted in ;paragraph !'d" above, the proposed use will be
a continuation of the, present retail use of this ,relative-
ly small building. Since it is substantially buffered
on all 'sides ,by neighboring commercial uses , it is antici-
pated there will be no effect on adjacent properties or
neighborhoods.
G. This conditional use should have no impact on public`
services effecting this property. This use puts no
above normal :demand on public water or sewer services.
The property .is served by a 4-lane arterial and tri-met
bus service.
} H. This conditional use amounts to only a change of retail `
use for the existing building. The building
approximately67 ' r g size et j
x87 which 'totals 5,829 square feet and `
should have little impact potential on the Tigard
community.
The applicant, is an experienced motorcycle store operator
with 15 years in this business. He is sponsored by the
well-known Harley Davidson Company. This will be operat-
ed as a suburban branch of the applicant's Portland store.
t
While it is not now apparent that this proposal could have
any adverse impact on the community, the applicant will
cooperate with any reasonable request to lessen or allevi-
ate such adverse impact.
Please advise if I May provide you with any additional information.
ery rulY yours,
Frederic S. Young /
FSy:1h
February 18, 1974`'
MEMORANDUM
To: City Council
From: Planning Commission
Subject: Recommendation;to Council concerning 2C 1-74 a request by Robert B.
Aungier to change existing County zoning from RU-4, Urban Residential
District and B-2, Community Retail Commercial District to a City C-3,
General Commercial zone.
The Planning Commission, at the February 5,' 1974 public hearing, took action recommending`
denial of the above describedzonechange. ;
Please note the appropriate staff report and meeting minutes are attached for reference.
s
S '
Zon,. . Cha* nge
atki Ave.
444 kTBar G080o00000000000 -
00000
0000000000000000000 ' 000000
000000 0000800 0000o G"( O,
000000000000OpQ000 00000400
0000000000 1 0000
8 �00G , 000= 000008000
0000o p d00o0od0000 000 ��,i� 4�
0008800000'00000 000000000
000000 p G 00 1�0 0 L-0 p�
OOOOpp0000 V
o°0000000°0000o000odoo°o°o°Opo po 00000 p?
00000000000000000000 G0o000 000
0000 00000000 0000 00000000000
0000 00000000OOOOpp000
00000000000
ul pm m-r �A
t�
80888 SUBJECT SITE
0000
(i
r
S 3
MINUTES
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
RegularMeeting - February 5, 1974
Twality 'Jr. High School - 'Lecture Room
14650 S.W. 97th Avenue, Tigard,';Oregon
x
1.' CALL TO ORDER
F '
A. The meeting was called to order at 7:40 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL.
j .
A. Members Present: ' Barkhurst, Frazier, Hartman,'Mickelson, Nicoli, _
Sakata; Chairman, Whittaker; Planning Director', Brooks; Associate
Planner, Bolen.
I
B. Absent: Commissioner Ball and City Attorney Fred Anderson.
j
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
9.
A. The minutes of the January 15, 1974 Planning Commission meeting were
approved as submitted.
B. The minutes of the January 22, 1974 Planning Commission planning
session were corrected to note that Hartman was absent, and then ;
adopted.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS - Zone Change
i'
4.1 Zone Change - ZC 1-74 (Aungier)
z
F .
A request by Robert B. Aungier to change existing County zoning from
RU-4, Urban Residential District and B-2, Community Retail Commercial
District to a City C-3, General Commercial District. Applicant
proposes construction on the site of a baked foods thrift store. The
site is located at 13735 S.W. Pacific Highway and comprises .95 acres.
(Tax Map 2S1 3DD, Tax Lot 400).
A. Staff Findings
1. Brooks presented the staff findings relevant to this request.
B. Testimony and Cross Examination
Proponents
1. Bob Aungier, the applicant, spoke for the request making the following
points of justification,
-' a. The existing conditions are compatible with commercial use of
this parcel, this parcel .consisting of vacant land, commercial
buildings and a residential subdivision screened from the property
by fencing and vegetation.
I
b. The request is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan which
states that development of this property be of an urban character.
Mr. Aungier stated that the requestedthrift bake shop, would meet
this criteria.
c. The development of a bake thrift shop would meet a community need
for this type of facility because none now exist in the Tigard
area.
d. Changes 'in conditions have occured since this property was
originally zoned because the highway has been improved and there
have been additional developments along Pacific Highway. i
e. This property is more suitable than other parcels which have been
surveyed by the Continental Baking Company, because it is on an
arterial street providing access between shopping centers.
f. The effect of the proposed use upon adjacent properties will, be
minimal because it ;is separated from the existing single family
development by vacant parcels and vegetation buffers.
g. Water is available to the site and a septic tank permit is
available.
h. There are no proposed methods for lessening adverse impacts upon
surrounding development because none will occur. '
Cross Examination
1. Sakata' asked if his statement was correct that unloading would
take place at the rear of the building from 3:00 to 5:00 O'Clock
A.M. from a diesel semi-type truck.
2. Mr. Aungier replied that one truck would off-load sometime between
3:00 and 5:00 A.M. and the route trucks, which will be parked inside
the building, will leave after being loaded.
3. Barkhurst asked the depth of the existing C-2 zoning.
4. Aungier replied 150 feet.
5. Whittaker asked how big the delivery trucks would be.
6. Aungier stated that they would be 17 foot long vans.
7. Hartman questioned the applicant's finding that a store of this
type must be located on an arteria?. type route. He stated that
the only two stores he had knowledge of, the Orowheat store in
Beaverton and the Franz Bakery store in Portland, were not
located on arterials and were quite successful.
8. Mr. Aungier replied that the store location criteria came from
Continental Baking Company and this was their experience on a
national basis.
9. Frazier asked how many trucks would be making deliveries from this site.
PAGE 2 PC MINUTES - FEBRUARY 5, 1974
10. Aungier said 8 to 10 trucks would -be operating from this location.
11. Whittaker asked if there is 'a building proposed for this site by
Continental Baking.
12. Aungier showed the drawing of the 'proposed facility which was a
one story metaltypebuilding.
Opponents
A. Bill Morgan, 10725 S.W. Fairhaven Way, spoke in opposition to the
request for the following reasons.
1. Approval of the zone change would result in the encroachment
of the business into an established residential area.
2. The proposed use is in reality a warehousing operation with the
exception of the retail outlet in the front. This warehousing
operation being ;incompatible"with "both the existing commercial
zoning and the existing residential development intherear.
3. That a diesel truck servicing the site from 3:00 to 5:00 A.M. would
certainly be objectional to the residents on Fairhaven Way.
4. The use of a septic tank represents a possible health hazard due
to the high water table problem in' this;area which is evidenced by
other septic tank failures on Fairhaven Way in the,past.
Cross Examination
1. Mickelson asked Mr. Morgan if his house was on a septic tank.
2. Mr. Morgan replied that he was.
3. - Mickelson then asked if his septic tank had failed.
4. Mr. Morgan replied that his hadn't, but that others on his street had.
C. Staff Recommendation
1. ldink Brooks presented the staff recommendation for denial for the
requested zone change.
D. Commission Discussion,-and Action
R
1. Hartman made a motion for denial of the request based upon the staff
findings. Sakata seconded the motion.
2. Barkhurst stated his opposition to the request due to the industrial
nature of the proposed use.
3. Hartman stated his agreement with Barkhurst that the proposal is not
appropriate for this site, but did state that the rear portion of
the lot should be zoned for a General Commercial use.
PAGE 3 - PC MINUTES- FEBRUARY 5, 1974
4. Chairman Whittaker stated his agreement with the motion but'also '
offered his concern for the rear portion of the lot which is now
zoned RU-4 and is in fact land locked. He thenencouraged the owners
to work with the property owner to the north of the development to
accomplish some means of access in order to develop this property as
currently zoned.
5. The motion was passed by unanimous vote of members present.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - Planned Development District: Extension of Construction'
Time Period.
5.1 Planned Development District - Time Extension: zone change 9-31-71
(Wallace Johnson)
A request by Wallace E. Johnson to extend: the construction'time period
for a Planned Development District comprising 1.23 acres at the
southwest corner of the intersection of S.W. Tigard Street and S.W.
Grant Avenue. (Tax Map 2S1 2BA, Tax Lot 800).
A. Staff Findings
1. Brooks informed the Planning Commission that the ,applicant, Wallace
Johnson,, has withdrawn his request for extension of the construction
time period.
- B. Commission Discussion and Action
1. Mickelson moved that; the staff recommendation for withdrawal of the
Planned Development District be 'accepted. Hartman seconded and the
motion passed by unanimous vote of the members present.
6. PUBLIC HEARING - Conditional Use
6.1 Conditional Use -- CU 2-74 (Randall Construction)
A request by Randall Construction Company, Inc. to allow a warehouse
use in an M-4, Industrial Park zone. Subject property comprises 5.56
acres •south of S.W. Burnham Street, approximately 500 feet east of S.W.
Ash Avenue. (Tax Map 2S1 2AD, Tax Lots 2200 and 2300).
A. Staff Findings
1. Brooks presented the staff findings pertaining to this request.
B. Testimony and Cross Examination
Proponents
1. John Johnson, from Randall Construction Company, spoke for the request,
providing the following information:
a. That the proposed warehouse facility would require a minimum of
public services, to include police protection as the facility will
have a security guard living on the premises.
PAGE 4 - PC MINUTES - FEBRUARY 5, 1974
f.
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
February 5, 1974
Agenda Item 4.1
ZC 1-74 (Aungier)
Zone Change E
For property located at 13735`S.W. Pacific Hiebway (Tax Map 2SI 3DD,
Tax Lot 400).
Applicant _
Robert B. Aungier
Applicant's Request
Approval of a change of zone classification from existing County
RU-4, Urban Residential District a-Lid County B-2, Ccurcunwty Retail
Commercial District to a Tigard C-3y General CoaLercial Zone.
Applicant's Proposal
1
To construct a baked foods thrift store and bak.i-g route distribution
point on the subject site.
Staff Findines
1. See attached rap for existing laced use and zoning patterns.
2. See attached applicant's submission as related to the Fasano guidelines.
i
3. The site currently contains one single wally dwelling wi th an adjacent
greenhouse.
i _.
4. The site was recently annexed to the City of Tigard and retains Washington I
County zoning designations RU-4, Urban Residential and B-2, Corr-unity
Retail Commercial District.
5. The Tigard Community Plan designates the subject site as Residential
Commercial, said Plan stating this category "is intended to accomodate
higher-density dwelling structures, including high rise apartments,
conbimed with a range of compatible office and business uses." The
plan text continues stating "an agreeable attangement of 'mixed land
use' in these areas can best be achieved if large tracts are developed
as 'planned units'."
'rhe Tigard Community Plan defines the Objectives, Policies and Standards of
the Residential Commercial land use category as follows:
Objectives
1. To accommodate a compatible mixture of high-rise apartments, garden
apartments, retail shops, and offices.
Page 1 Staff Report 2-5-74
2. To c in ,elected parts of the Tig=_rd a'_ca a pattern of development
that is characterized by higher-i.nte.nsity a er normally a.sociat•ed with
a central city.
\ Policies and Standards
1. Residential-commercial development shall have. direct access to the major
street system, the availability of adequate public Liti.li.ties, and will be
situated-in locations that are suitable for high-i,nt.er_sity ".;Fes.
2. High-rise apartments are encouraged in these areas as well as,ccmpatible
office uses firer, headquarters,,insurance, .finance, and professional -
staurants
recreational uses - hotels, motels, y and theaters - and
commercial and service uses that relate to higher density reFidential
development. The overall density of r<sida^retial deve'_cp.<ent will be 13
dwelling units per gross acre. Ba-.ed on detailed da,zgn studies,
densities between 30' and -740 dwelling -it,, will be permittedinsuitable
areas. U it these de gn ��tadie� are e + -ple d, each
r sed 'ial
the av a., e nsity of 13 3w-_11_.._L units
d eve lcpmerF t wi:'_1 be l iM._t,�d to r h
per grcFs acre.
3. ZOnirg TE -`lc^tic._ t}tP�c areas will assure a ccmp3-?bl e t. t10
with adjacent nt land *.ct c Each developmEri: will ac.c..=,;'idate its c++--q
parking
4. Use of "`p1y.. ed za Lir' dF=vElvpmerit" techniques is C.,e uraged in rder to
better relate residential and ccmmarc.ial uses and to permit flexibility
in d.esi.gn to enable a higher quality cf devulopc^e*it. Adjacent p-cpe-ty
f` owners will be er_couraged to cooperate in the a ernbly �f land for
deveioFntent as a °9pl:a�e�ned ursit°'
5. Devc1opm:ent will coi. d with Ghr � s� ,n of. public S meets, watt-r and
F
sewera.gF facilities. These facilities sl-all be (a.) cap_' -Ie of -adequately
serving all intervening prrperti.es as well as the proposed development,
and (h) &_siKaed to n:P_et city c,x county standards.
6. Establish high design standards for signing and appearance, including the
landscaping or setback areas and the designation of access points.
Staff finding 5. continued.
Policy and Standard #2 states that dc.velopnent. should be high density
residential or office oriented with any co_renercial use to be related
to the proposed high-density residential use.
Approval of a zone change to C-3, General Commercial would allow the
incursion of commercial uses into an existing single family residential
neighborhood. Policy and Standard #3 of the Tigard Community Plan
states "zoning regulations in these areas will assure compatible transition
with adjacent lard uses." The direct interface of General C=ercie.l
and Single Family Residential uGes is Tc,L a cc^,patible tra.raFiti r_ of. use.
Plan Policy and Standard #4 and #6 enec_ rage the use of planned unit
development techniques, high design standards and most importantly, the
"Assembly of Land" for development as a "plc. ned unit'% The applicant
has not aggregated parcels to achieve the above stated goals.
Page 2 Staff Report - 2-5-74
F
Policy & Standard #5 states development in re,,-idential eoranercia_= areas
will coincide with the provision of public 'stxrets, water and sewerage
facilities. Public streets and water are available to the site, he-Wever,
public sewerage facilities do not abutt the ; qtr and it is not cuxrEnrly
practicle to extend existing limes. P,-A cy,and S,'wandard'Cpl als': riezti.cns
the availability of p .blic utilities as a prerequisite to development.
on the basis of 'conflicts with Policy & Standards ruF._bers 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5,
the staff finds the applicant's request does not conf>rm tc t:hs Ti 'ard
C6,rI12nl ty—Plan-
There
lan.
Thera are no similar stores within the i uaiediate Tigard area. The staff
feels there is a need to provide ,Tigard consumers with the broadest 'range;of
retail shopping choices ccnsister_t withthe "Tigard`Coninuni ty Plan.
Consequently the staff interprets the pr�Fpsed use as fulfilling a
community need.
6: The applicant has not provided evidence that other .itFs, zF:)nsd to
allow the; proposed List,, have been considered as alternates t.o' the
proposed site. The applicant contends that national experience has shown
that the proposed use should be located on "high traffic arterials,
preferably on routes to or from a shopping center". Orowheat;Breads
currently operates a successful baked food "thrift store in the Beaverton
area. This store is proxim:itous to retail and grocery shopping but is
located well off major arterials in an industrial park.
7. The movement of, delivery trucks on and off S.W. Pacific Highway sh,.Lld
be considered related to the appropriateness ofthelocation of the s
site for the proposed'use.
8. The maneuvering and parking of delivery and supply trucks adjacent
a single family neighborhood or the location of a co.rnerrial structure
adjacent a single family reighberhood, will have an adverse esthetic
and economic impact on these r::Widential properties. The applicant stat-c&
the proposed use will have no adverse affect on the cc•^rmurity. The
applicant has not provided evide.r%ce his proposal will h,alre no adverse affect
upon the adjacent co-munity.
9. The C-3, General Commercial zone allows uses other than the use proposed
by the applicant. Thus, there is no guarantee that other uses, less compatible
with a single family residential neighborhood, might not be constructed.
Staff Recummenda_tion
Based upon staff findings,4, 6 & 8 denial of the applicants request.
y
i
i
!
Page 3 Staff Report 2-5-74
r
i
t 4
JAN1�,
January 14, 1974 1914
Off
Subject:_ Fasano Requirements C'
To: Planning Commission and Staff, City of Tigard
1., The following information is presented to
tion .to Baking
Company
Applica-
permitconstruction of Continental Baking Company Thrift
Store at 13735 S. W . Pacific Highway, (Tax Lot 400, 23 1 3 'dd)
a. Specific purpose of proposed zoning action: -
To construct a bakery thrift store and bakingroute distri-
bution point.
The thrift store provides a retail outlet for bakery products
both fresh as well as products 'returned rfrom 'truck routes.
The concept of the operation has been in use by the major
bakeries for approximately 12 years, Continental Bakery
has some 1000 such stores nationally. Product is trucked to
thrift store and' off ,loaded during the early morning hours;
normally between 2 and 4 AM. Route trucks load from the
store and depart on their respective routes by 0700 AM,
Trucks return from daily routes between ;2:00 and 4:00 pm,
(They must be off the street by 4:00 pm)
Product returned by the route trucks is then offered forsale
through the thrift store,
b. Is the requested zoning in conformance with Tigard's Compre-
hensive Plan?
The Tigard Community Land Use Plan indicates a Residential-
Commercial category for the area on either side of 99W
between Bull Mt. Rd, at the South and West to approximately
SW Walnut on the North and East.
These areas are intended to have an urban quality similar
to the down town Portland Urban Renewal Area with high-rise,
low-rise apts., office bldgs, together with related shops,
restaurants and service establishments. In this contex it
is believed that the Thrift Store would be in conformance
Commercial Land Use category.
with the objectives, policies and standards of the Residential-
( -2
C. Does your proposed zone change fulfill a community need
for the proposeduse?
The Thrift Store concept has been a success nationally and
it is felt that it will provide the city with a viable ''
new service which does not presently exist.
The proposed facility will be visually attractive, ecologically
compatible and will present job opportunities to the local
labor market.
d. Have there been changes in conditions, i. e.
street capacity, availability of sewer and land use
that would justify a change in;zone? water service,,
Highway 99 was improved last year to,provide four traffic
lanes plus a left turn lane; additional traffic control
lights have been recently installed. Each of the foregoing
improvements have greatly facilitated traffic flow on this
arterial.
e. Why is proposed location more suitable than other locations
in city zoned to allow proposed use?
Experience has demonstrated nationally that these stores
should be on high traffic arterials, , preferably on routes
to or from a shopping center to he successful. ;
meets these requirements. Subject site
f. What effect willropose
MM
neighborhoods? p d zone change have on adjacent
Proposed site is bounded on the southeast by an equipment
rental facility, and on the northeast by a service station.
The rear of the property abuts the rear of residential ;ro
southwest Fairhaven way. The lot depth of homes facingpetty' i•e.
Fairhaven Way at the point of .contact with sub ect
150 feet and is screened b j property is over
in height Y evergreen trees approximately 10 ft.
9. What types of public services are necessitated by
Proposed zone change and what
these public .services? impact will project have on
Public water is available.
Initially, underground disposal of sewage is contemplated.
Site was approved for septic tnak and drain field by Washington
County in 1972. Connection to USA and/or Tigard Sewer System
is contemplated as soon as available
3
t
t
I �
h. If proposed use has an adverse impact on the community,
what methods do you propose to lessen or alleviate this
adverse impact?
It is felt that the improvement will have no adverse impact f
on the community.
5;iii
9
I
}
i
t
t