Loading...
City Council Packet - 06/12/1967 ttt' P•`r;r_ ' r.I; ��, 1967 :k, :i �GWihT :AkKty A id i r f; ;ze. aliit r, j?. u, tet;n 7 J<raL Funds i72.SZAL -V. tr'oL rt-tt, 'l FIRS RASE, OF ,gN'YTi, al< ?,:4 G rated .05n4 Yt,095,000 £�daxal -t4ld uYc of ti T.ctm_ ,Yst :t Us k 3 „t',OT-A,t; Fc c>lx i ian rze qu ,L.it j f ed yr;I rund5 1 tN! t., u"•'. ntI r, .t .' .sal•.._ '91;i'T Ai]USTMENT 4y L,rr��r. ',.r .... is S R Xe S r • Y h x� iP #3 Z.. fr; � el' j.x -+ r 3 J 'h s. t x1 h }l is Yi` 3f• F. x eAKR g xa. C `Y } _ T L G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, MONDAY, JUNE 12, 1967 ROLL CALL Present: Mayor E. G. Kyle, Councilmen F. H. Bergmann Harvey L. Knauss, Edward P. Saxe, City Attorney F. A. Anderson, City Administrator Robert K. Logan; Keith C.,` Thompson, City Engineer; Monnie S. Andrews, City Recorder 2. PLEDGE Or ALLEGIANCE 3, M.NL'TES, for approval May 22,1967, May 29, 1967 A correction was made on the May 22, 1967, minutes, page 3, Motion to Deny the Appeal of C.L. Woodard was Seconded by Councilman Knauss. Approved as corrected. 4. FINANCIAL AND DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS FOR MAY 1967 (a) Submitted and made a part of the record. 5. PAYYNG OF THE BILLS -`Total Payable $22,752.66 Motion: Councilman Bergmann, Seconded by Councilman Knauss Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 6. DISPATCH AND MOBILE;RADIO EQUIPMENT BIDS General Electric Company $1,902.50 Motorola $2,183.30 Bids opened by Mrs. Hartig and Chief Wilkinson at 4:00 P.M on June 9,-1967 Recommendation of City Administrator to accept the apparent low bid of General Electric Company in the amount of $1,902.50. It was noted that General Electric had fifteen ' exceptions to bid specifications, but it was felt they were not substantial enough in view of-price-differential. Motion by Councilman Bergmann to Award Bid to General ElectricCompany, Seconded by Councilman Saxe. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. f;_7. REPORT OF CITIZEN'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE REGARDING THE SEWER`STUDY By STEVENS, THOMPSON, RUNYAN &'-RIES WAS GIVEN BY MR. DAN LARSON, CHAIRMAN (Copy of Citizen's Advisory Committee Report Attached) Motion by Councilman Saxe to accept the report of the Advisory Committee with our thanks, for their efforts, Seconded;by Councilman Knauss Approved by unanimous vote of Council. Page 1,' 6/12/67 8. RLSOLUT10N 48 - APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL GRANT (P„L.660 TO CONSTRUCT THE .PINEBROOK BONITA INTERCEPTOR (Grant Request _$37,250.) Motion by Councilman Bergmann to approve application, Seconded by Councilman Knauss Adopted by unanimous vote of Council. 9, RISOLO+.._TiDN #9 - APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL GRANT (P,L,660) 70 CONSTRUCT FIRST PHASE OF MASTER SEWER PLAN (Grant Request $3343,500.) (a) Attorney Anderson advised the City not to start bonding procedures on this project until litigation is settled. It was pointed out, however, that the scope of this project did not extend to the contested Cipole Annexation area. (b) Recommended by City Administrator Motion by Councilman Saxe to approve application, Seconded by Councilman Bergmann Adopted by unanimous vote of Council. 10. S.W. MA_N STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT ADJUSTMENTS (Ad- justments to be made as listed on the attached .report) (a) Report given by City Engineer Old Assessment New Assessment J. C. Josephson $2,494.54 $2,121.72 Laura C. Johnson 4,473.85 3,728.21 Oregon Electric 1,398.08 831.39 Cutis C. Tigard1,677.69 1,422.31 Motion to adjust above Assessments: Councilman Bergmann, Seconded by Councilman Knauss Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 11, S1, W. MAIN STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PROGRESS PAYMENT TO DALE SAND AND GRAVEL (a): Report given by City Engineer- Additional`charges to date: $5,746.35 (b) 1st Progress Payment $5,949.90 Motion by Councilman Knauss to pay progress payment, Seconded by ,Councilman rSaxe. - Approved by unanimous vote of Council Page 2, 6/12/67 12. CONTRACT WITH PRE-DELIVERY SERVICE CORPORATION (FORD) FOR SEWER SERVICE AND CONNECTION FEE (a) Report given by CityAdministrator -.Contract provides for annexation to the City, -reimbursement"for a sewer Tine which has previously been constructed on S„W,: 72nd Avenue, and that Ford .Motor Company pay an additional fee of $1,365. to Mr. Joe Fought and Mr. H. A. Andersen. A sewer connection fee has been negotiated and provides for payment to the City the amount of $2,275. (b) The City Attorney stated that he would approve the contract with the stipulation that Fought, et al approve Pre-Delivery Service Corporation connection to .the sewer..... Motion by Councilman Knauss to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract with Pre-Delivery Service Corporation (Ford) subject to the terms set forth by the City Attorney, Seconded by Councilman Saxe, Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 13. REROLVTION'#10 Resolution Adopting 1967/68 Budget, Making Approp% riations and Levying Taxes as shown on the Budget Documentapprovedon May 3,; 1967, by the Budget Committee Public;Hearing 8:00 P.M. No Testimony. Hearing Closed' Motion by Councilman Knauss to adopt the 1967/68 Budget, Seconded by Councilman Saxe Approved by unanimous vote of Council. (b) AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSFER $1,200. FROM THE GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY TO THE PERSONAL SERVICES, PLANNING'DEPART- MENT, GENERAL FUND OF 1967/68 BUDGET Recommended by City Administrator Motion by :Councilman Bergmann to affect transfer of funds, SecondedbyCouncilman Saxe Approved by unanimous vote of Council. Page 31 6/12/67 14, ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - An Ordinance Annexing to the City of Tigard Lands of Arnold.J. Westlira and Opal C< -Wesr_ling, being part of Lot 1, Tigardville Heights, Wash- ington County, Oregon Public Hearing - B-00 P.M. - No Testimony Hearing Closed. (a) Ordinance Number 677-36 - Ordinance read three times by title and number Council did not request that the Ordinance be read in full. Motion by Councilman Saxe to adopt Ordinance, Seconded by Councilman Bergmann Adopted by unanimous vote of Council. 15 OUDINANCF An Ordinance Amendina and Supplementing Section 10 of Chapter VIII (Parking Regulations) of Ordinance #66--20 by Amending and Supplementing Section 2 of Ordinance 467•-1 by Adding Provisions Thereto Prohibiting Parking within Designated Areas within the Right of Way of S.W. Pacific Highway (99-W). Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M. No Testimony Hearing Closed. (a) Ordinance Number 67-37 - Ordinance read three times,by title and number Council did not request that Ordinance be read in full. Motion by Councilman Bergmann to adopt Ordinances, Seconded by Councilman Saxe Adopted by unanimous vote of Council. OTHER BUSINESS 1. The City Administrator reported that the Y,M.C.A, has been leasing a' building on 'S.W. Main Street known as the "Teen Center". This building was previously rented by a corporation in Tigard known as the Tigard'` Community Activities Corporation. The Y.M.C.A. has closed their facility and the building is again available for lease. The Tigard Community; Activities Corporation has offered the City;of Tigard the use of this building for a Library or Recreation Center, rent free, for a 'period of ` one year, July 1, 1967 to June 30, 1968. <However, the City would be required to pay the utilities for the year.. The 'rent for the building, at present, is $135.00 per month. An option to renew the lease is available, City Administrator noted that City Offices :have need for Page 4, 6/12/67 space used by L?,brary. He also noted a move to this location would commit the City to either renting this facility on July 1, 1968, or finding other quarters for the Library. Motion by_Councilman Bergmann to move the Library Facility to 12566 S.W. Main Street July 1, 1967, and accept offer of Tigard Community Activities, Seconded by Councilman Saxe. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 2. SOUTHWEST PACIFIC HIGHWAY SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT -- FINAL PAYMENT Recommended by City Engineer and City Administrator that the City pay the 10% fee which was retained by the City for the construction of the S.W.-Pacific Highway Sewer Line -_$5,098.03. City Administrator stated that the City had received letters from Mr. Setniker,' Pred-Olsen and Mr. Galante stating that every- thing had been taken care of satisfactorily.' Motion to authorize final payment: Councilman Bergmann, Seconded by CouncilmanKnauss Approved by;unanimous vote of Council. 3. RESOLUTION COMMENDING COUNCILMAN JACK WELL FOR PUBLIC SERVICE Motion;by Councilman Knauss to adopt Resolution, Seconded by Councilman Bergmann Adopted by unanimous vote of Council. 4. REQUEST FROM MAYOR KYLE, SOUTHWEST OFFICE SUPPLY, TO CONTRACT WITH THE CITY FOR SERVICES OR SUPPLIES NOT TO EXCEED $500. PER YEAR Mayor Kyle noted Southwest Office Supply has purchased a map reproduction machine and the close proximity ;of the machine could be more efficient and economical. ORS provide purchase from elected officials providing ;such services or commodities do not exceed $500. in one year. Motion by Councilman Knauss to approve`Request, Seconded by Councilman Bergmann Approved;by unanimous` vote of Council. 5. COMMUNITY PROMOTION'- Donation to Jaycee's for Rose Parade Float in the amount of $50.00. Motion by Councilman'Saxe to approve, Seconded by Council- man Bergmann Approved by unanimous vote of Council. ' ADJOURNMENT- 8:46 P.M. Page 5, 6/12/67 ;i:SE^drLD FOR PAXM...T JONr 12, 1907 Gen F71 l uri .! irional Bank Ra nc .T_> :1 2 2,J.. $18,9)2 .282, May tec ., p,. l =103 ! Balance 2,6;9-61 1 C'h.ek No, 2265- Leat-.'of =:c. Vehicles 5.00' 2266 Roger rhrmssoiu - recording tc>,. 14.50 2267 Leagiie, oz Ore:. Cities Trust 112:26 2268 Hugh Ii: rii l _f rs:r+a - travel expense 6.52 2278 !l 7 r,u :;en- recording easement 6.=0 L2.79 Monnie An iA as travel expenses 11.9G 2281 W.e11iain .csrrii! - gavel expense 65.70 2232 Aiat, r,ancial Services Corn. - Juni: 54,24 2285 V.,td~ 2280 rund Conditioi;a.l Use 7, en 2287 recording fee 2290 Portland Gen, ;11 Electric St. Ltg. 629.65 661,31 2291 Del !gall lora repairs police car 49:84 2292 U.S. Poot.mastn:rpostage 100,00 2293 Tigard Junior Chamber of Commerce- nose float 50,00" 2294- Stevens & Thomp-son 13'7.,50 2303 Fred A. Ander;on 339.70 2304 Northwt,st Natural. Gas 26.42' 2305 Tigard Pharm,a:y - Police 4.50, Library 3.35 7.85 2306 Northwest Iraelustrial Laundry Co. 7.60 -2307 r udelnuln Brothers - uniform 196.95 2308 State Compensation - renewal premium 1000 2309 Motorola 40,00 2310 Wash. Cty`. [leapt, of Public Works 22.50 2311 Nine-T-Nene Service - Police 204,43 2312 The Times Publications -- P & Z 5.50 127.63 231.3 West Coast Telephone - Police 21.30 195.30 2,314 'Iiddras>ograi h' 'dultigraph Corp, 7.95 slalarle- c Taxes 3,709.48 Total $ 6,253.13 Book Balance. $20,148.74 Sewage Disposal Hund First National Bmance as of A6r'i1. 3(i,yl'S6? '- $29,066,60 May Receipts 21,449.93_ Balance SSG, 16.53 Check 7o, 723 U.S. National Bank "Sinking Fund" $ 316.67 739 Lr-aque ;of Ore, Cities Trust 82.41 745 Void 751 Frahler Electric 130.00 755 Stevens & ThzSrilipson Farmers 16.66, Phil Lewis 9,,-o6 1:37.60 - 756 rrGd.A, Anderson -- Farmers 14.00 42,80 758 mileage 22.96 76C) i°igarc Lumbar C'o. 38.63 761 Wast Coast Telephone 23.45 762 Northwest Natural tar 115,45 762,3 rennsal.t Chemicals Corp. 123.00 Page 1 6/12/67 764 Ani;ricyan Industrial Service Co. - two months S 44.45 765 Michslet, Sowers, Johnson & Co 18,50 766 Con's Machine &Repair 11 ,75 767 rortl id Ceneral Electric 265.50 768 Coast to Coast Stores 2.25 769 Valley Aut.x farts 6.31 770 Tigard-Sherwood Truck Service Inca 6.06 771 S M Corporation 94.14 772 Stevens & Thompson Sewer Study 7,500.00 773 Tidwell Sales & Rentals 7.50 774 Barbur Blvd. Rentals 10.00 775 Ori Tire Stores 2.00 776 John W. Compton, Jr. - Farmers Ins 439,00 777 Nine 2 -Ine Service 41.87 Salaries & 'Taxes'` 2,903.11 ' Total $12,375.41 $38,141,12 Sewage Disposal Fund, U.S. National Ballance as of-P.pril 30, 1967 $ 793.80 May Receipts 16,25 Balance $ 810'"(�5 Road & State Tax Street Fund, U.S. National Balance as of April 30, 1967 $26,769.69 May Receipts 23:02 Balance $T6-,-rg7 Public` Works &-Roads, U.S. National Check No. 4.93 Monnie S. Andrews - cash custodian - petty cast, $ 100.00 494 League of Ore.' Cities Trust' 29.85 498 Tigard Automotive Supply 10,83 499 S`avc,,i� ?. TLompson - Main St. 171.00 501 Void 503 Void 504 Void 505 Fred A. Anderson - Main St. 40.80 506 Eudaly Bros. - two tanks 60.00 507 Tigard Lumber Co. 34.14 513 Pioneer'National Title Ins.' Co. -'Main St. 1.50 514 Valley Auto Parts Inc. 10.35 515 Nine-T-Nine Service 17.45 516 Portland State Work Study 30000 517 Feenaughty Machinery Co. —paint striping machine 1,17000 ,518 The Oregonian - Oregon Journal 6.70 519 Daily Journal of Commerce -`Main St. 42.90 56.34 520 Flaying A Truck Service 7.00 Salaries' & Taxes 1,038.96 Total $ 3,054.92 Park Check 511 Portland General Electric $ 2.50 512 Tigard Sand & Gravel 14.20 Total $ 15.70 Book Balance $23,721',&9 Page 2 6/12/67 Iancrort Uon:is #I s Interest, U.S. N"'tIona1 Bank t3alance .,_ c r April 30, 1967 $ 971.52 May Receipts 39.09 Balance $ 1,t11G.E1 CeneraL Fund, First National Balances as oY lipril 30,- (7 $ $49.16 May Receipts 55.00 Balance $ 90h.i6 Banc;rotf E?onds #2 k :Interest, .First 14 do i,'l- Balance as of Apria 30, 2,602,96 May Receipts --612.95 Balance $ 3,215,91 Check No TIS—U.TIS—U.ff, Bank, 5 1;052.50 Book Balance $2,163.41 Road Fund, First National Balance as o% May 31.,-297 s 18.99 Bancroft Bond #3 s Interest Balance as May 3l--,—E9-TT-- 5 395.09 Sewer Construction Fund, First National Balance as of May 31, 199667 ($ 3,275,35)' Sewer Construction Fund, U.S. National Balance as of May 31, 1967 r, 66.11 Total Payable,'.First:National $13,427.91 Total Payable, U.S. National 9,324`.75 TOTAL $2�;T5� EIiS Page 3 6,'12x67 FINANCIAL STATEM:NS Play 31, 1967 EXPENDITURES 1966/67 Current Year To GENERAL FUND Budget Month Date Mayor and Council $ 2,400. $ 66. $ 1,873. Municipal Court 1,990. 200. 1,967. Administrative Dept. 22,892. 1,521. 22,210. Building Dept. 2,725. -0- 1,018. Planning and Zoning Dept. 625. 6. 566. Library 2,285. 53. 1,801. Police Dept. 37,978. 3,101. _38,383. Non-Departmental 19,116. 1,407 14,216. Contingency 2,483. -0- -0- Transfer to Other Funds -0- -0- 100. Total General Fund $92,494. $6,354. $82,134.- SEWAGE DISPOSAL FUND 2,883. $4,686. $57,203. Operating & Maint. $7 Contingency 3,747. -0- -0- Transfer to G.O. Bonds 12,370. -0- 10,250. Transfer to Other Funds -0- -0- 46,242. Total Sewage Disposal $89,000. $4,686. $113,695. STATE TAX STREET & ROAD FUND' Public works $4 3,004. $3,009. $24,139. County Roads 3,948. 62. 1,105. Park Improvements 5,125. 17. 3,334. ContingencyFund 723. -0- -0 Transfer to Other Funds 0- -0- -0- Total State Tax & Rd.Funds $49,800. $3,088. $28,578. GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS& INT. 1960 Series Dec. $ 3,250. -0- $10,250. 1961 Series Sept. 1,175. -0- -0- 1956 Series July 17,345. -0- -0- Total G.O. Bonds & Int'. $21,770. -O- $10,250. ' BANCROFT BONDS 1 & 2 & INT. Bancroft #1 $ 2,250. -0- $ 1,997. - Bancroft #2 7,500. $1,053. 1,106. Transfer to other Funds -0- -0- 401. ToItal.Bancroft.Bonds $ 9,750. $1,053. $ 3,504. FINANCIAL STATEMENT May 31., 1967 REVENUES 1966-67 Current Year. To .Y >ENERAL FUND Budcret Month Date Available Cash 7/1/66 $19,000. S -0 $23,792. Property Taxes 19,000. 103. 21,778. Building Permits5,600. 2,'639, 18,705. Franchises. 14,338. 216. 16,280 Cigarette Tax -0- -0- 6;026. Liquor Allocation 6,600. 3,148. 10,015. Business Licenses 5,500. 132. 7,953. Pines and Forfeitures '1.1,100. 965. 1.2,535. Other Revenues 950. 262. 2,372. Transfer from other Funds 10,156. -0 861. Total General Fund $92,494. $7,465. $120,313. 'SEWAGE DISPOSAL FUND Available Cash 7/1/66 $23,000. -0- $27,360. Sewer Service Charges 36,000.' $2,785. 38,431. Connection Fees & Misc. Income 30,000. 18,681. 81,718. Transfer from other Funds -0_ _0_ Total Sewage Disposal Fund $89,000. $21,466. $1-47,509. STATE TAX STREET AND ROAD FUND CashonHand as of 7/1/66 $25,000. -0- $26,718. State Gas` Tax 20,852. -0- 21,669. County Road Tax 3,948. $ 23. 3,309. Transfer from other Funds _0_ -0- _0 Total Street and Road Fund $49,800. $ 23 $51,696.- BANCROFT BONDS 1 & 2 & INTEREST Cash on Hand as of 7/1/66 $ 5,222. -0 $ -1,928. Cash with County Treasurer 1,103 -0 654. Assessment #1 & 4;-2 2,675. $ 546. 3,386. Interest 750. 106. 1,362. Transfer from other Funds -0- -0- Total Bancroft Bonds $ 9,750. "$ 652. $'7,330. GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS Available Cash on Hand 7/1/68 with County Treasurer $ 6,700. -O- $16,281. Taxes 15,070. -0- -0- Transfer from Sewage Disposal Fund 12,370. -0- 10,250. ' Total Obligation Bond Fund $34,140. -O- $26,531. UNBONDED ASSESSMENT -0- -0- $ 765. c pFs �nent� 43 -0- $ 788. $31,424. ''Assessments #4 -0- 3,642. 3,642. s Transfer from other Fund -0- -0- Total -Bancroft Bonds -0- $4,430. $3,5,066. TIME DEPOSIT INTEREST (Road Fund) -0- $ 282. TIME DEPOSIT, INTEREST (G.'F.) -0- -0- $ 267. r ?LI CI1zr,rf. pP?R`,'Tr,'S - ITAy 6 197 - _ nt9P'T VCO"JTPAC'T'n^ T� ADD F!7,9 11� Dave Stun —�—_ — i5 T"P� VAT,T A^ION c ' Nort�2 Alexander Const. Co. 11Sc,0 ;. .,. Alexander Const. Co. .,0 .o._t , _^akota ?r ic3ent n 1cI '� 1 40, S. T.a. 'Torth na}cot r n_ ,237. .i3OuiS Girod 39G5 _7. T es9 ence 15,097. r P,o,'-.,ert Nichols 10265 S. . `..on_;lercia.l Car -ts}. 17,670• Richard Ylunnlcutt,Jr. 11555 6 C.ommerC ial once r S. 750. Georgia Paci�ic Corn, ur(Iocl�: f ,'dit:ion 8,77 '. 14030 '. 7?r_d --OMT';orcial 145,113. C:iroc?s Supermarket 12230 �, TT• ,u Phil Lewis School ain Street ?qn 15^. I267.S S 72.nd ?:veiiuv `:clition ?�,n' Tigard. Christian Church 13^-05 i• `I' Jack m �:icr? s,�� - . Taylor -. 3 1.27.7 Church Y Vier Lane �, -�c x5,2.52. Luminite Sign Co. 12 L sir'ence 19,102. �J '170 'S. ,.'.ain ,-tract `zn �10�. Charles Schulz 11995 ;. 350. „atller.i ne nes i�7e Pete Junguirt 13125 -nee 2.0,624. Powelson & Martin s Drive '2.esi,�ence 11445 ,c,, ra 21,.312. Creenr_�urg Ac'dition Stan Adkins Builder 13260 S. Cv 4 ,000. Merle Dalve Ash Residence 24 0� 1196,5 S 7. 118th Ave. Residence �, .n2. Oregon Film Service 12970 S. f.T , , 1_ ,0- 0. Vance R. Lee igh�°'ay 217 Warehouse 22..5,260. 1250 S . Brookside 'esidence 15,948'. Dave Stroup 12055 5..7. ianzanita 'Residence 14,133. Total S_941,592. MAY REPORT :r TIGARD TREATMENT PLANT. `.. SERAGE DEPARIXENT Total gallons of sewage and industrial waste treated 22,1640000 gallons , Average daily flow: 7154000 gallons' Total solids for the month: 62,250 gallons` The daily average of solids: 3,660 gallons- Total chlorine for the month: .n 435 pounds The daily average of chlorine: 14 pounds Tests run to show the plant efficiency are: BOD Test: Raw Sewage- 190 ppm (parts per million) Primary effluent- 85 ppm Final effluent- 16 ppm Primary percent removal`- 54% Finalpercent_removal- 91% DO Test: Raw Sewage-'3o4 Final Sewage- 6,5 Percent increase- 47% Solids Test- Raw'Sewage- 162 mg/l suspended solids Final Sewage- 26 mg/1 Percent decrease 82% M, MARMUMM: t5 a f a To Honorable Mayor and Council City of Tigard June 6, 1967 Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of a sewer study report developed by the Tigard Citizen's Advisory Committee. If possible, , I would desire to present the report to you at your Council Meeting of June 12, 1967. Sincerely, Dan Larson, Chairman dl;dh t rC<.it ..q4•; :ilp:LSt'7T"y .:OTtiTt?1 .,".�_ .. TK_-. -'°Ja;3T t'm,'""'.) 1{h,n CL?5 the M1 b Lze:=:FT''s � .�__.�•� tire. :c Sgt, r,:'�dell of the t",gt:.e<t on.c usit n.f ct:_'(i :i.PK_'0TTM1V.'t.,:07 cT;•" ti.r J.0 material w lch furms SE.(rt,2:`cYge k71.r•+.12 for t?ih taiTSijiso , Runyan and Ries antd ,; !moi r n of f:r b ;m o tTl'r'_ t u Lis 6.5dincj for anyone w'ho .•Iiia' 7:�r. �tiC;37i t +y a_ his area attempt dl.zc I :z. S i _ �t':Lyr,nS- snlso familiarize themse- ve,- .at.�. 'li,�.Iio:`i.t.y in t-pte.m. :, s ib� 'r the Co i JT<si:..:'11E��,�.C'1 'C5f In t..e.C'^e-"it'o:L P?a`a.In.t.s and House,., D.Il.1...1. 1:32 G, N re -Lo aid to th.e &�-�velur7snen,• Of, ? .:�i ­ , ag __ Some backgr and kro:)wLed e l J g_ o. *� = r ,t z as1 of _r 956 hc-.a_d be also re:viw4ed. �-1� '"�'C.R.t.�U24 CR "�Gd .;<cs.•�t, ':,fit :f<° •tea ia, r; In 1956,, Clackamas, Multnomah and provide a master plan for sewn-ge coil'( ,..t_ rd, t,t.. ll:rfFr_f�tm*.riLo, On a 2 county basis, This plan was composed Of :i.,tve:-�ra i lnter'c¢iSPto z serving sifou ban areas of Portland ir, tr-l-Ch of t no< z"aunt esu A S: 27a1f sewage treatmentplant was to {'etY. `l,._ ir_La . 'h- WeYat, bank of t'': 7!.111'. ettee River at pro,)OCL cost was estimated then to be S27,424,000, "Ill i= p ,,r. ,*`tzm ain s u_te only comipre.hensi.ve scheme for sewage- disposal ; o1�b to area of Wash- ington ash- :ingto.: county. The Washington County portion of the prupo- i�;d "r :.--ount'y star�c Service Brea is con•taln d entirely i,-ith:,L the T.oalatin Yasin_ ,'i•:e sysste,.,I was designed to- carry this en;.:.ar s'...rc-a -initially wiFh a si�::xlP :.� "enc ptcar following the channel of : gut !': fr in Beavert,on to 'a pr�aT:t at:,Durhama who're the :interceptor �,o°ald ti,} z 7 follo, a co-jr�e leading'to make rove and cGntintie$ acro�.> .�:.; e Oswego ibtne�"w dat the bottom of the Jake to the plants s i_ii- 'at. the CIL of `�.����fa a Page 1 t.tlE: la anga'., C"'J. 311.11 Co 7 l•.A'tE':t'CaE:7a. . c th 1�11.'JtiS..nay.. C:3 Vit' ,L.. ,k•'` Lake C),_-; e—jo ! t SCI t:l c sIke .:f c 1•. ' i. ♦C�t:1.' t fir;, c7. ' s rFli. LC 1 i , r 'SC� 8'1 i :7b= co a 1.SIG IT1 i 11 A s Ys cam:ju t•Y._ci.. ° Tiy 4.V S inc the .. Y . cxGc 'm1 plW3ce S011acl'1 .! 't'1Ci+3l i' for 1t:5 tll'"3.Yttz.et' c:iJpJ�1.f r..ta2.s:. ' I. Lr',•C L h plan 6V �: y. 1 Ei'° b .✓rr .[E'a'C;SP. .ti. facilities � r, .ax[r t. ��'- S:r a", s � �.re p1.�n-.«�r� and and comijjL t--i f� Vi hi nd � Y 17� 4 ✓t. ' j t. f L1t::{.e the "tri. c :,max and .`41CPi'a 0»-iL1 so that. ;heY prc.p,".sed tfP,,o f.J.a CJ 'K 0_ F,_ 4Le i'=nno 4.:ree'. lnte ce.p or 1r.. Uld n l3. :� X.)TC ei e Cl -to C:i."r7ks 3`lt'ct J:ta .`wn 1: ic'- F-ci1,1 a ii� z, k}� G {yyE C� � Z".O � pck.rjj jc,',p s e :1n e, cos".. of ;te isk_ ,P ,i_. .sr�_".I,..}g„, � ,_ .r' �'a?'.':~eL7 Creel: t:t ercep c� STATE SAN `a AI;K.y r IVI F,.;t�r,° Y � Jr Fc 7s��r �E P�r w1 Kl Ec 1966 Arucaff' Zi? 6s3$ 17L't a:ireC� for t'he _.x: {' 1.":i"'� .rx _ y re r,:a3� t the following ttv ae 'Oncl. ls­ ?d . future, along with aajricclul �'�'.Y Y�1 �L ;»s a ?1 � Lv es ial3c3t cwt carried, or fro the source. C7rt� slsx P��a15 viiLtt are water carried a This will be ce <,.rw��d:�a.Y rf t;he c~wa.e ref. treatment provided. 20 Summer-time flows of all streams nasx,rt alyoW little leeway, for adcyqu..fe diluti _. and -55 ox; of wat'.e7 Carried yi'stes.. �a1t.s r ill e t.rV-R {.cxrd �.s` L`� the teat:X[lees% provided. There 'seems Llc, ire 1:[.t le chh,-rc&& of z.9,.gmen ink t h i 8 floes for dilution and .aes'imilixt._.vrn p1:trp-sea ..5. i`:'tSiIgh the S1 099Yi7s PLS , will provide add t'dortal wat . fir r1.. wa ��dus}:.�'�al �:��[ :�ra.;��1�- ural use.. Pane r.: pg1l 11g: 3, The: .. r c r sevr-,'al more �?IFiIIilras They four-ul i' ) roughly _t. c. t^ _ t L1 1P. Basin sc. vrz f....._ .... .,N. a bo t.,h ceivers A +_v .h .i+ p ,ry S, ualatin Etta'- :: i z c, it 't .� ,°i. t.Jia a and by 500,000 barCt. n�, V - - faciIit:.es 1;: f races. �w,Iat. FR E�✓e 'f :-J fr<>rR a population :7•f 189, 5010 5. currently iJE:4 DC7±.:"T'-I.Y[q inost of f`rum .t'tye L5 o„ti:. � _ �t'"vIT. nearly 7_C:. ;7S} ii ,[ i 210'1)UC3 S .; 7 T( ., f'.CI ? r: floss continue :;r x..1mo1—•r;" '.(.'G 61,x,s :I��. _ ? t:..C. "_tL�iA..::- 'Tt._R+._::.iii;, ,"he water qua!ity of the al.:c, .r. i w ..r. zc ,., qF•i is .. 1:•; _-; � b'ut,arie's ..:a.t. -A.tal'y to les > ,i.�:.i. ..7 L' is ,�tiit'. ..,.f<I E'�7.; Ti1.'!.&` is not Surprising cr;n'sioer.i g i`�:..... t,'arly to zero each s .]llva I The c3vix'11`�� ---I ?'t z r?3s long needed a master, ply. C)r s e,V'V a g a'+'1 of i_I ec``C ao, ;':kr, 7 ` mew to serve- as guide, t.:0 pro-,7",do c!C.dC ` , f r? x a ,n=x% kca�,dl ng of its sewage acid of-her tva sLe .a..:ad5 Recognizing 41"he Urnosr. 5lti y and master plan for Sew&ge for :-,au : ,a 5 cnn s:W g the lack c�faRl ta'n ble, ik3dyc - olan LL be forthcomtnq b.ii the, near fur'UrF.L } r, .. t. ;a 14. S.s:n? A.;!'_,ho s tai orders Ilh x_ a poI'Lcy be Fit ! �. ie s e n u the ba.s In, f r tire. 1. „"E:'C'illi y"l.£.""..•.^d ,t"_ I rl a>_ in-'t' is develojvf l tr1opted, as folla;ti 1. That. no new se,,j,age or:wastL tz._25_ . =gin And no £'xpr'nsi n of existing facilities, other th -r —1-C'".x. Us1y Committi'-u, be approved forcons 4>ri:c t.l on L�3£e` Susi: _nlc M provisions are included pxeven d sc!_verge of she _ff luent to the ''. Tualatin River or �is t"ri b +'a es tubi.F?j the low f lt:w season, normally 1 June to 1 2e That those in charge of ex: sring Ii ties located en. tributaries of the 11u-1.1atl” az. zJer be Instructed is ,•_a<;:.' 1 to comply, T.".hLL`O U'g l _.)e r 'i t i ort5 and or Page Pe ; 'Sewer Stkidy Report: upgrading of treatmi nr policy'dzrective a Ic a x r plant effluent with.... demanci, fection before, they Ll?ERAL AND ,T_ ATL: GRANTS There etre several f1Thr]Ti .L a.. government to assist in :17 Of these the most likely t - ,r: Public Law 660 admin�stf Administration (L'WPGA) program ,provides as much u=nless the State of Oregon w...t may increase its grant to 50'/. e Leg:x....latu, e h= rc.pria.,._, matching funds� Therefore and federal grants REGIONAL SEWAGE PLAN FOR 1x`r THG 4psoN, RUNYAN ANDRIES This report is concerned w wu :f= the Tigard and Tualatin, purposes of this report. a growth in the area since G €3, a7,,Ct continuous and such furth : effort to determine an econ ,n 1_ f treatment and disposal of th, will result from this growth,, to determine the prelimin=ary are : L sewage l'ac:iiities, including p`: v stations, force mains, ,,treat�re k.' +: , �� L w � to meet the anticipated needG cl.t' r'3s `a__: r;10t s papulation increase in ;Haste r,t t-ti rn :a 0"1., cope with the sanitary sewage pro {- +' z r f'u ° s; z } ` a f. sG:7 have varied from COT1StrUcwltkg ,oval +>7 i,:- n sSt. n-'t V. 2i xi ' as small as a single indust:.zy .yr za preliminary planning for a m lox M .zrtzs ~`e serve much of the Eastern uisb :izecl a-e. . ..a*, 3 v c:'U. Within the study area, .the largest E-f ... tO _ facilities has been made by the K,, . isa. {a ter.: �c= i foci this field date back to the Tigard Page 4 .iacs. r + c• .. YE.'ii -?.I..is :i j-t.":;.= .L'fav Y"<'x`e=d Within the study _ r.r; ••.f .these, Tigard ca Ie cities of Dui'I�niD t =:i�•. :.v n_..t!,;L 71 _ Y.-,rosals before .it..since L963 Y.t*. ;=:G:', Sc,4ec��e ' rrr: k. L.kl.i.t..Xe3:3, A �proxima.tely 9,000 of the i4,�%C �rE � �t.«asifV e e "suburban land accord t.c 7 :t:: ,F.. � c _ :a.2.. :s classified as rsxra.. :r _ : czs. x:r, 1960 z c,; �1 d t� Ltt:iy }yul:..ation Was approxini6t . ij s{ (r t t i LI",.c�t this population is li,a 0l' � �._;..:,1 ! i 3t3:., �.ir i.i �ilL.x.:Lic$i:t'C� t1he wt.udy area population will IE the presnt time '.e:-nl,: te1y 4,900 persons residEl ~cr�ti aced il3E 211:311' We population within the z_ad aYc,z_ :Y I:: 53€ j`"i_-Lon ift, t' b a3 {3„eats 110,000 depending upo�� ttk� ;r �t cext of rr�.~s;r.ial and co€.�,.« rei,al development. 'Phe populat.ior;s p cslr•ctµc a.e premised on ade,:sliat:e municipal facilities which, inicludllr no.. b:ut ;R?sc-r water distribution and road sys tenis , At t t: I time , 1(_sa s than o�.,---half of the study area it served by v :�vr,=.ba't.Y{�:x f �txes f An implemented master plan. of svF:a_cny of inT_e ceptors .s._ .Aral trarak siewers would make it posSib:l.e to corst:.r°�^t l xte al sr=c,e: �- the land is developed and thus avoid d��pl cr# i.oak of ccs s rh _: l septic -tank installations h v�- be abandoned-of Tigard operates a secondary sF ,u,:ge t e�*1 amu. molar': d s gneu to serve a population equivale s,r of 5,600 pF sc`_ss'� Recc.ne operating data shows that the plait in cIOerating at. about 65% of :�pa rityr recent experience in sewer corrte tions, i.diva`e : t.:'at. the plant may be at 100% of capacity in less than 5 years she only; sewer of considerable size within Tig-,ard is an inter-ceptor sewer paralleling Fanno Creek from thc n.larit: °:o Leron Height_ part of this line .is owned by the 'C;ty ;ar.d t-he: .remainder, includlln, the: pumping stationof limited capacity, is o,,_ d by a private developer. Two pumping stations down. _trea.m .of "he -eurage treat- meet, plant provide services to the area Lhal:. are '1 1Y industrial at the present time. ;ksr r _�.Lsio�k Sewage Treatment Plantt serves a small subdivision teat recently :annexed to the City. Tt-js plant; is nom efficient and it discharges to an intermittent stream_ PrOV1lsions should' be made to abandon the: plant and to conne^t, t.be Pinebrook Subdivision to .the city's sewer system. The king city sewer treatment plant is riot operating at capacity, and duzing, summer its effluent is used f.`rr irrigation of the King City g elf course. At other times 'its e:fslua^t should be piped to -the TuaRiver. Page 5 within the City of Tualatin there are three sewage creaa;ment plants. One sen.�u ;. : vitY Company, anot"I'l -t the Peerless Trailer Company, and the last serves the Ramada Inn. The Hervin and the Peerless plant have not produced satisfactory effluent. No problezci is known to exist with the Ramada Inn plant. Outside the study area there is the Southwood Pare Sewage Treatment Plant which discharges its effluent to Ball ��reek, an intermittent' stream" that flows into the study area and through the City of Tigard. while the Tigard sewage treatment plant, operates efficiently during the winter months, there is a algni,ficant increase in flow with s consistent loss of treatment efficiency. An investigation of the collection system should be made in an effort to reduce this amount of infiltration. It appears that dui: to t•he upgrading of standards for sewage treatment and the recent prohibition of disposal of treated sewage from new plants that the most course to follow with regard to the existing Tigard Treatment. ,,.lana would be to operate it as it exists today and bypass flows i.r: !�_xcess' of plant cR_eac;ty to another treatment and disposal system 1rcated elsewhere. Sewage collection systems,proposed to serve the study area consist of interceptor, trunks and branch sewers. Lateral sewer systems have not been investigated inasmuch as they are not ameniable to the type of master planning required of this report. Population densities of the order of 10 to 20 persons per acre maximum were used together with per 'capita flow rates of 125 gallons per day in order to arrive at sewer designed flows. Studies of the population to be, expected in 1950 have been made but the economical life of gravity sewers is such that they should be designed for populations expected 50 years hence. Topography was taken xnto account in sizing trunks and interceptor sewers. The flow from certain areas which are beyond the study boundaries but never-the-less drained by gravity into it were taken into account in sizi::.e_ ",,fterceptor sewers. , There are three basic proposals made° Plan A Sewage collection system contemplates concentration of all flows at a central sewage treatment plant. ' Plan 8 Sewagecollection system contemplates two sewage treatment plants, one near the City of Tualatin to serve it and another .at the Tigard City Park, the site of, plan A plant, to serve the re- rsainder of the study area. A slight modification of the plan A collection system was made when consideration was given to con- centration o£ the flow at a single pumping station, between Durham Page 6 Rot i(3. and Lbe of Y ay no Creek, that. would. 'p r .ti, -rr:, to F:'.Mi city �1),f rakc, 4.1.,I where it 'tiouild be trea`:...d r3 s` r d"dS , ged t.III ens d r;- proposed sGw'age collect-Lon system, ot:lY peri. .s re< �m re:snded L°,4 construction in the rear fut ra_e:., l i.i s includes interceptor A from the Tigard :v ty Park to a Roars where it e' jolts ,irat.�zceptut O., connec_,J:. t.o the P1_rs_:brook Subdivision,, Trus"k sewers to :serve Lbe Oregon L«..cat o Associaltion abwo ,e S.W� 72,nd Ave. and serve the Derry Dell area no..i`.ivv&.st_ of Tigard are also proposed for the; first stage Sout,h o th4c, C F.brE_C s�+s t.:"ip of interceptor erceptor se;n'`ars and �L'+z: ks t0 sC.: af- the: incorporated area. of Tualatin are proposed. :N-,e remai-nir.3 n'c,�::k 41 will be: postponed until a greater need develops, VfU phase 0-ne work of plan A .includes an estimated $858,0301. of tzunks arcd :sewel:s The phases one of plats .B sewer system consists of S8`3 ! .0030, O trunks and interceptor sewers. The inodificat__on. of to permit" disposal through the City of Lake Oswego woull. in a reduction of sewer costs of about $125,000. Trearmerit a ✓a disposal were Separately in the report in order to at-rives at t:he most economical means of disposal. 'This was necc;:-:sa - izeca'+u°se or the recent ruling of the OregonState Sanitary Authority that` there will be no discharge to the Tualatin River or its tributaries during the months of June through October inclusive from plants which were not connnitted for construction prior to August 1966. Disposal of sewage through the City of Lake Oswego 'l.- erceptor system has been given 'consideration. This arrangement would in- clude a pumping station on Fanno Creek east of the city park,togELl- r with a 16 inch pressure sewer discharging to the lake, intercepi.or at a point where ars 18 inch gravity line joins the 30 .inch interceptor sewer. It will be necessary to negotiate a rate schedule with the City of Lake Oswego for conveyance and the treatment of wastes so dis-, charged', Lake Oswego now contracts with the City of ',:~.rtl,and' for sew- age treatment at the 'prion Creek Plant locate=d'on tk;.=, of the Willamette River at Lake Oswego.' For purposes of this yL 1:s t. it is assumed' #ha+ b- . :a would be $100. per million; gallons discharged and that Lake Oswego would offer such service at, a reasonable` nurdber of years. The cost of the;pumping station and they force main involved is estimated' at $281,000. It is estimated that: by 1980 an additional 1.6i million gallons per day of sewage treatment and disposal facilities will be needed in the study area. It is recommended that the first stage construction of sewage treatment disposal works be limited to .8 million gallons per day. Under plan A, a single .8 million gallon per day extended aeriation treatment plant north of the Tigard. City Park is proposed. slander plan B a o6 million gallon ;per day plant north of the park is Page 7 .�t11 28 miiiicn gill.ion pew x I y Y.t '.'* x. The 1 xt;er plant i.s )ri)�70aEaC? t _' as ."on 14' O —` Lr ..:Y1c^.nt � a Ytl,?; 403{' C�.� n.:th Ler it :Y t.• Ter1 fa it. 4Emct.;.e phos ph _r -s G1:ol tSi.fcli 6 r �.� t�z! t t "i.aa j the cr;ql_,I-C a l _TU+flt` is :`�t. es l+.�. '.;r� •:U5 L..i iallon per days' Lit 1'1 £, t he d s .6 mx 1l' o a ?...1 lr-,n pi C 01 YZ1 s, 1 th r co I11�)-ir ible Cost is "?,000, The t! 'r ;tl-r.3a t1.n is �207a000, 44i'hicl"2 for e-,C.Y.aC'v t':C'eat'.TR{:nt for, disposal d'urtng critic-:-L 'Tic^.t t.t.,._ - i :is )os-71 to .kJ? U%Ala'.tin R7_vej from such plants i•s Y3''"'.Ca ):2,,.,.:;1 c.iY:iC.'.r.:3. .!-A-S c' �mo».4.'.t. O. NCa`w'"-Mbe t Uough May, J nclu.sive ;i.ir'tl .!...!...ring Glia r(—,ra1,e. months by means of overhead spray 1_ �' ��t;z.v , (l.Z.si :ZgF{i rry the ground th-rou i-i wells, d1.sposc?d by .•�quYT1treut;!.-d r,ff .Y.erll- to th'e. �NA!113.aTtc.".t e 1ciVe.r at Wils.on.v'11.1e, t;fila"z tf. 1 .yUt?i during the .t critlilizal months with .rejej!Se dul7iLrij Lh � .i.'.L`;�:r, �.:.0 f'1t :';D )S t ie i.Y.ili�r afti�er' tertiary tr'ea*.Tlli�nt ha-ve be�IY �Cti):. x Of these the most economical appears to be cors t.r"actzori of t i roc r., a.lt:hough land is limited and it may not be possible to .:->_.t rue 1e:goo—,: ng after a c r x c aLage design flow rati is developed. Lagoon-i g `aas the adv.aryt.age that a considerable portio a o^:=- the cost.- nariely S itt, acquis Lt:ion car- be I',•ecover'ed if t-he lagoon -mist be abandoned at some fu .:re date, 'and it also has minor operatio:. hnn .naa nter.Ance 1 US Ls� lagooning does not: seerm desirable to " -e city, r-heri' tertti. ,xy treatment is proposed, Lagoon ing.for plan A would require a protect cost of $209,00o. and for pla.as ;$1`�1,`oat+C , Terri pry' trea+Trr!,L for a o8' million gallon per day would .cost. $204,0 00, but. has-0,perating costs 14 times greater than thclse for lagoon. Of the sev:;ral alternatives considered for se-visage collection, treatment and disposal, the most, economical arrangement on an annual cost basis results from the entire area employing one treatment and and disposal facility, whetherr it bre a treatment. print in the ; Tual at:in. -valley or 'a cransmiss ion system to Lake'; e. Yo ;hosing between in basin treatment and disposal by wZky of Laky ,�.s<r�go, the most economical plans for A million gallons;per day oh an annual cost; k'eIZ--2. from disposal by u-ay of Lake Oswego. If Tigard and Tualatin are not able to cooperate in a single system of collection, treatment and disposal, then it would be more economical orf an annual cost basis for Tigard to arrange for disposalby way of Lake Oswego, than to construct another sewage treatment and disposal works in the vicinity of the City Park. The program that contemplates disposal for both Tigard and Tualatin by way of Lake Oswe:go .results in an estimated total pre . ject costa (exclusive of trunk sewELrs) of $646,000� for Tigard and $21.3,000. for Tualatin. The program that: contemplates only Tigard disposing by way of Lake Oswego contemplates a 'comparable Page 8 Foy- Tigard and �318a000. fox. ,-uaj--_L1.C1., _°igdTdIs Co � t.rit. re cosi.. of the pumping zs. u m;i t.r0 tr f .cr: ce.rc-;ek to oswe o; g Federal Of t h`S(- ' O to b fl'.CS=aCCC'� directly Page 9 decrease in capital costs resulting from. na.t.ior: tris been invest ;:faked and it is estimated r .:nki.ng of the project is not effected by such e:, r 7r r7 Thia effect.: of a 75/ federal grant toward capital ro t_-, �.- cx t;•r. _t:t. Fry. i.*-re= .menz pl.arnt has been investigated at .8 rrs_i3 l it':r; 1:.:s?� per Day aesign flow, This results in less annual cost,;, l>ttt o;,.: .r Y:r i ixed dost for the comra,�ni.t:.y than disposal by =k Cd °-:xkE xo too more e:xten.&ive sewer construction to reach "=1l i t` ira a ii--y Pa.rkn 14hen R8 million gallons per day is exceeded t-,T treatment will `require large capital Outlay. Disposal by 054ego will not, so loam W13 the capacity of the lake ^'F ccs' ',Or ss not exceeded. The rer701111nendations of this report are as follows That the ...ity of Tigard and that the city of Tualatin adopt the plarr for trunk and interceptor sewers olitlined in rhe r,ienort, 2 o <> tlY.e IDUMose of economy to the region as a whole, plan A tuz thca cOliection system be adopted by the two cities, 3. AJ-SP rsa.l of the collected waste be accomplished through trans- t<issi'cM to the City of Lake Oswego if a satisfactory treatment and conveyance rate schedule can be arranged. 4„ If it is not possible to arrange with 'Lake Oswego for disposal cf the waste then the cities should propose to jointly construct :t se-wage treatment plant in the vicinity of the Tigard City Park and; that the first consideration of the disposal problem should be givers to^ lagooning with secondary consideration given `•o tertiary treatment. Tertiary treatment °could by more economical if a 75% FWPCA Development Grant were obtained, So When the course of action with regard to treat.me,-r ;. and disposal has beet, selected, the cities apply to FWPC3A for construction grants to assist in the financing of the project, DYSP SALyIA LACI; OSWFCO Since the number 1 recommendation was disposal via Lake Oswego more, data on this ;proposal is summarized here. A pumping station would be con3tructed at the mouth of Fanno`Creek. This pumping Station would not only serve interceptor Abut also interceptor D and any force mains constructed from the south side of the Tualatin Rider'. `'-':'he discharge from the pumping station would flow;through a 16 inch .force main connecting into the City of Lake Oswego°s lake interceptor, laid in Lake Oswego itself. At the proposed point of connection the lake interceptor capacity is 6.5 million gallons per clay and it is believed that at the present the lake interceptor has Page: 10 ­­,city for tile?: quant-ity of sewage L1It.der consideration p-i7esent volume of flow in the like interceptor a:: 1, ki.w,r4r .,. ltl f . .€jn ^reek Sewage reat:rctent plant has a designed 'of= 5 mil lion gallons per day, a.rrd it is presently cpe.rsting ;: it is r-s t;.imated that: by 1980 an additional 1.6 c3�Ay o't �5e +age trecitmert and disposal facilities w-i.z 1 bcti r.. r,:.3cy :. our study ..rea P"'. , .;e;, tg":' a .ltnps, have a limited ab -l' t.;y to develop pressure and so 16 pipe rtl order --) conve the flows under be ) > p.. y teC?J1. .dl-: t,:iCal3, Ifie C ',) tcit:y proposed would be 2.5 rnil). E:.x: y=:cZ:lori4 per ct,-y, t.t",re:e rimes t_tle treatment design capacity phase 1 of plan A. This takes. into account peak loads LfsF'vkS:•z.ble^� - ri£ rease_. :�f flo'-,,i i_.�.1xing the, vJ'in r with this 'cac snible to jrLcrease tt:he .flow to 5 .million gallons pe,f dt�y b%, t. _ 'si e v:[ lamed pump impellers a:~c3 but flows in of 5 million gal10,ris per day wird: not t.hou.,.l' Feasible ow in1g to the hydraulic cap:=tcity of he lake interceptor. A.s of t...nt; ,t resent ; ime Lake os,rego cont.rt�cts with the amity of pork'Aaind 'fc .r the treatment of the entire sewage flows of the City c-:f: Lake 0,riwego at the rate of 64,50 per million gallons with an for a a,Ircha:rge if the per capita flow, from Lake Oswego increases above an agreed level. The rates which the City of Lake d�;weao might charge Tigard and/or Tualatin for such a program are not,Jof course, known' a.s of this writing. It has been assumed that the C.-i -y of LakeOswego would mark up the c-64.50 rate by about 50%., CONCLUSIONS The 'S'lyarc3 `Ci ti.zen s Advisory Committee fully agrees on the follow- ing .item, 1'a THERE IS A NEED FUR EXPANDING THE PRESENT SYSI;: a, 'te believe that if action is begun now it will be about two years before any of the new system would be operational. By that time, considering the present. increase' and the growth rate of the area, we believe that the present plaint will reach capacity. Should the present plant apacit:y be- reached before the ;.new system is operational and become necessary to deny sewer connections, a serious health problem and stifling of the industrial, commercial, and residential growth could occur. We believe such crises should be avoided.,> 2e URBAN DE TELOPME�Nr REQUIRES 'SEWt RSA Septic tanks are designed -- for rural use. Urban re :ide:gtial development with septic tanks is uneconomical because Ic o` the large lot size required, and the increased distance between Page l'1 Cos :3f ali tit"t.17 1E:5 'c2V1.Eo .;i:i dtVelOpW C` e•r t1-rally or a"`1ll ,If Students to schUols A great r.;r ;I <! .r —1-elds c ea-te, a hill ill the backyards of h 3 n ;nd ._h tleis ell are lite-rally. _r, some pl,�.ces, playing in their SE _ ige, '111-is fact can b,E dem +ns gyrated by dye 'nests and it is r«_• +,t,ur t<?�.ct f ;.;t. taaxt fall An are: wide tesci.rg of septic tanks with dy_ 4-, . 11001d Tei= institutedc, 3� I i T.w`Ti� Ct k'tr' j,­1'i_1-)N OF NEARBY R; ;T RZi fiIVCi STREAMS SHOULD BEAVOIDEDe +:a< ree with the concept: of the .r lxr_g ofthe State Sanitary Martha itY ranno Cr•aek and the Tualat.ir, River could become Vett' a t.ractr ve rc_'71E�a.t-ionzll assts r_r, t::lie are: with parks on their batiks, w .ter skiing and swilning In the Tualatin River, were t.h"le_v not so }=anvill/ p�- IIUted„ At the pr��e,nt time :f_n the desirable stimmtr inon,_hs th y~ srrctoo cont:amit atred for arty pleasure or recrerxt.i.�rsxal 'uses carld are jr, fact a healt , hazard,, The City of Tig-ard should do ;its sh:-ars- to ;-:lean up and unpollu_ uth .Eanno Creek and the 'T u alat.in R vr-r "�'r S tl t f, +°id�MPSdriT�i R JNYA`.7 AND RIES REPORT 7S�AC.C1 P�— 'T'ABLE We agree_ w1th the study area and believe that Tigard and Tualatias will have eventual .responsibility for this area. Although the plan does not fully follow the Pri-county plan, it does take into co.nsi.deration our responsibility to plan for disposal Of sewage; from the Surrounding area. we believe -:.hat although the plan does not provide a final solution for the sewage needs of the Study area, it represents what: is politically feasible at the time, We, dt:iabt if the voters would approve building a b foot grafi �t;r line to uake Owego, even thougn this m1ght represent the fir-AI solution, g. WE RE,"U ri,+YTEND P7IMP1NG ?'TiE RAGd �EW�,.�E EO LAIC OS�GO� Of the several alternatives pxesr rt.ed `wE~ favor pumping, to ]Lake Oswego over all others, it appea s to be the most economical both on initial constructioncosts and operational costs. indications are that a favorable contract for treatment and transportation cost can be arranged with Lake. Oswego and Portland. 'tae contract duration would be about 20 'years, We do not believe, however, that at ,the end of 20 years,' Lake Oswego or 'Portland would refuse to, renew the contract. On a con- tract of this type, it will necessitate a repair of the present System to reduce the rate of infiltration in the winter months. It, of course,' behooves us to do this c toy anyway no matter what system we g As for', the; second alternative a summer lagoon, we believe that �. this is Politically ,very even if it were less expen- sive.' Ke,would expect considerable opposition from property owners Page 12 T�ropo:3 C� laOYto basad upon ha, .rdz_ We would ag fes with 'them _it,l l;.t:;y :A cor.tamir, tion of uv`<.�.li . r i'-. =j•_ ixTC.;.a z F.f :.r`_„t i_ s }.a"..'f." vcq°ui cles, attractive. _,c.. . 'n .d: sT`tc7' Lo these prcbleMs, x o,.Jz1 do mien +�" capacity of c s. .it C+L 5E't'TIlS too costly and l:{sr,t a *; 3r r I nt ::^• .:.t. t: , ::nt��_x. r;!.�-t'., (i„ T 3+�iT t I-s US Y r A R ' The Cityof : Tualatin may Y.s...-k'. .y i-3. ,ik i .s 7.� .:t vG jt: \,�.>i r-h,.:.Cx. C:�'iC': near f'iiL:ll`L'L:, Aiie :a�Jr7.}.1( '�".ice 10-15 for rt to baa .ld a. tertiary .ttG36 .iCI_ 40. ..,<C3Y he TCtcaf.T'. 'iCT.i.l the statics of fi�13.]..5 c'�nol.. �'at l:.�:. I..�>' L`.r-.!'.ref lTi<::'iE;f..}< .max r .i� Ls t'.iXI'n'� ,'^ �C10V.7P. .S.t will t:nie ,,o de? t i_de^ wh, to Oio� S d has to bu..la,..tlne p~oiect; W' its c< t.t c. r_cs t vo'tAd 'be 00, 0 0 higher Lb n LI 'rualatin or r 'i :,Jt'Ited., We v,"ould :r £7otarttend that t h(. line '}:'.r'; .J,slr%t�J:J L1c .t}'aili" !t'tE?. :icimx; 5��L'e itt 3ii-a. C.'1 45.�'i t Tu,41atln decides LO i,o<. .�. -��_....�'...r- C..F't� C.c.`wy o'F: T{..t.iat..�i finds '.t,: riac :•`_�sc2x."y to become x a of Tt; �vs t :�, h{ r Cts �. cost of the line can be r ,!: Ove1<t_d,. we, at.- the :same time, e`C>iTld hpive the advantage of owning tlrir._ system arid could exert more. clt)alit:y co7it of over their -'ire rp;Ti 6'fI .T`t .J cou.tlt{ it E_ht~y v,7c e pe=aYl:aer'.s with Cts in the. line: e ,Te."om—,itend t.ha tli* 1 i:7ax.d � .t_ty Council tr�oroaghly study the Ing. o,~ s,.l se-wage ;p7�11 as i.t' :Is proposed o ': hopes that they Mould :.ttF71 r,'»sme to the zn ..,ot,clusions ghat pum. p ng the raw sewage to the L=ake '0._wccgo .t t.e.' ep'rsy is the hest method of solving the probl.*:.`mi� We would 1-,he 1 beegxn an educaticonal campaign of the voters n the latae suTl"t;Te and roc auunend subm ttng t.o them a bond issue for the project .in the fall, followed by an application for federal gran'u, upox,' the approuai of the bond issue. 71 t �.����ti Ea The C-4'.ty of ''.l.gard issued bonds :in 1963 .attd tax money has not 'beer!, used to retire the bonds e Debt service is pai.'t _ ,^max' connection fees. with the high Fate of growth antic-:_gated; the c6'nmiittee feels thatthis same method of paying bc;;-:ds -^ould be used, thereby el zslinat;ing the reed to use property tax xvveyuc:,S for debt'- retirement. in the Stevens and Thompson report.` the debt `service cost was based on a bored sale at 5% interests >l rr e the publiu:�r. ion of this report: a more favo able bond market has developed due to declining ;interest rates and it is the feeling of this committee tb t<. bonds could be sold for 4%, 'which araal opmr1— g cost. this present xedT ^e the lg band marketwouldla:st is problematica{la sufficient bonding capaci;ty Is ava:il ble for the project if the Lake Oswego alternative .s use:3 ether tnc�x'e clues,sive alterratives w©<xld place Tigard near its bonding c,,pscity4. p great deal :depends upon the amount of page� 13 t7i` t: Ii:a _ .l_% tlL l: ''.Y{ for C,h357rajgCL, is avail", r tt r r {TN o y �1eC,C'2Ar, • . vi Fii �r_ r 1 �"rc.Teily presented, i ly work far I' Pe 16TCE DEPARTMENT CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH Or 1,1AY 1967 Last Month This Month 4 1. Speeding------ ------ ------------.--------- 56 42 2. Reckless Driving----------------------------- 0 0 3. Driving While Intoxicated - - 0 4 4. Disobey Traffic Signal or Stop Sign----------m-- 4 6 5. Veh. & Oper.Lic, Violation----.v------------ 6 17 6. Imp.-�Def.Equip. Lights, Brakes,Mufflers) --tl-- 2 5 7. Illegal Parking----------- ------------------ 23 22 S. All Other Traffic Violations------------ - 9 12 TOTALS----------.....,.<m....-----.-------- 100 108 WARNINGS Given to Traffic Violators--------------- ------- ---- 69 78 RADAR CITATIONS--- :-- 17 TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SUMMARY Last Month This Month Accidents----------------------------------------- 13 21 Injuries------------------------------------------ 13 5 Fatalities------------------------------ ------ 0 0 Hit &' Run Accidents-----------'--------- ---- 1 2 MUNICIPAL COURT REPORT Last Month This Month Cases Processed Through Court-------------------- 93 86 Fines & Bail Forfeitures------ --------------- $964.50 $999.00 Amount Suspended from Fines---------------------- '$95.00 $125.00 Cases Pending Last Day of-Month-----------------® 16 15 POLICE CAR EXPENSE-MILEAGE-GAS-OIL-REPAIRS Unit# Miles Driven Final MilesGas Use Oil .Used Repairs ' Re Maint. _ 3 4,857 16,984 531.7 9 ,qt. 046.09 2250 $201.47 $6.55 79,133 29.2 0 : '0 0 Page 1 I.>i'.PAR 1,2NT MONTHLY REPORT UNIFORM CLASSIFICATION OFFENSES CASE'S ARRESTS OFFENSES CASES ARRESTS CSL t>FPENSES _. _.._l;NtltNt�<�:_ `LEAREDKNOWN CLEARED-- - PartWI "lasses _ Last Month This Month 1. Criminal Homicide (a)murder & blon-negligent Mans laughterW 0 0 0 0 0 0 (b) Manslaughter by Ne li- gence .w.. o 0 D _Q2. Rape--__.�W.__w�.m._. .:. _� _�.� - 0 0 _Q 0 D_ � 3. Robbery---- p _0 0 2 0 _Q 4. Aggravated Assault-__I__­_­ 0 0 0 2 2 5. Larceny Theft (except Auto) (a,5 Over $50.00-- -�.,�.�.­ - 5 0 0 1 1 0 (b5 (index $50.00------­­­ _9 -3 ..3 .3 ? -4 6. Auto Theft------------------ -0 Q 7. Burglary-Breaking & Entering Q _0 Totals, Part 17 :lasses—18 __ 5 21 Part :I Classes 8. Other 'Assaults------ 1 2 9. Forgery & Counterfeiting-— p 0 0 0 10. Embezzlement & FraDd------- 0 1 7 _Q 11. Stolen Prop,-Buying,Rec., Possessing------------------ 0 0 0 0 0 0 12. Weapons-Cariying', Possessing, ' Concealing----------------- 0 0 0 1 1 0 13. 'Prostitution & Conunercialized Vice-------`------ ---_ ------ 0 0 _0 0 0- 0 14. Sex Offenses (except ,2 & 13) 1 ul 0 1 1' Q 15. Offenses against Family & ' Children----------_.-----_ 0 0 a _Q 16. Narcotic Thug Laws------ 0 0 0 0' 0 0 17. Liquor Laws----------------- .L 1 la 2 2- 18. 18. brunkeness----------------- 2 2 2 2 2` 2 19. Disorderly Conduct-- --- 1 1 1 0 00 20 Vagrancy- -- -- - - 0 0 Q 2 Q S2 21. Gambling-7----------------- 0 0 0 0 0 0 22. .Driving Whi-1e Under the Influ- ence of Intox.Liquor----- 0 0 0 -4 23. Violation of Road,& Driving Laws---- -m---- - -65' 65 -65 5D 50 50 4. Illegal Parking- - -m-- 23 23 23 .22 22 .22 Traffic & M.V.Laws---- --- 12 12 -12 3b _.6 6. All' Other Ozfenses--------- 17` _16 26 aD E� � Totals, Part 11 Classes GRAND TOTALS,, Part I & 11 Classes 129 127121 135 127 122 age POLICE DI::.PARTMENT MOYrfILY REPORT UNIFORM CLASSI;F I ATT'ON OFFENSES CASES ARRESTS OFFENSES CASES ARRESTS OF OFFENSES _ _ _ KNOWN CLEARED KNTOWN CLEARED Past Z Classes (Breakdown) Last Month This Month Larceny--Theft (Exceppt. Auto) (A) Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 (B) Purse Snatching-­�-,_., ._, 0 0 0 0 0 0 (C) Shoplifting------- 6 4 (D) Thefts from Autos (except E) 2 0 0 0 0 0 (E) .[hefts of Auto Parts Accessories---------- 2 0 0 0 0 n (F) Thefts of Bi.oycles---W-- 1 9 2 ` (G) 'Thefts from Buildings (Except C x 0 0 0 1 0 0 (R) Thefts from any Coin i operated Machines------,- 0 0 0 1 0 0 (1) All other larceny, Theft-------------------- L 0 0 6 2 0 Totals, Part i Classes (Breakdown)--- 14 --- 4 - 3 16 8 4. _ ,Page 3 v10 1i,CE DEPARTMENT HENT MONTHLY REPORT ARREST-OF.-MINORS ---- `RAr FI.0 ARRESTS BYAGES OF MINORS _-- -- - - OFFENSES -- 15 J& Y 16 17 18 19 20 Totals Under S _71 :._.. ..Y_ - 3_..� 3 4 5 m lq Reckless Deriving-a----- Disobey Traffic Signal2 or Stop sign.-,..._ l 1. Operators Lic.'Vioi-- 1 1 2 1 - 5 ations W------- 0 '�I�hvLic,�7�.c�lations���� 1 � 3 Defective Equipment-- l 1 Driving While Intox.-- Other Traffic viol. -­___. 1 4 35 5 5 8 8 7 7 - 20 TOTALS LAST t4ONITx 1 4 � 7 g 2 _ MISCELLAtI LOUS A�+cF=_TS BY ACLS �7F �'JVENILES 10 & 11-12 13-14 15 16 17, Totals Under. - -- 0 Burglary-------------- 3 1 1 1r Larceny------.--------- 0 Bad Checks-------- 0 Auto Theft.--.,--...,--...-- 1 Assaults--------------------- 1 0 Liquor Laws----------" 0 Drunkeness--------------- 0 Disorderly Conduct---- 0 Vandalism----- -------- - 0 Poss.Stolen 'Prop------' 2 - 2 Curfew & Truancy-----Y- 0 Runaways & Escapees--- Misc. scapees---Mise. Criminal��®�-�yey 1 - TOTALS----------- 2 1 1, 3`- 7 TOTALS LAST 2 4 b' l 8- 21 MONTH--------- Page 4 PO ,CE DE PA MOra'mLy REPORT AC;'T"i"�JIT' REPORT- Last Month This Month v 1. Accidents � 13 18 2. Vacation riouse Checxs� =s__ . .....� . 49 37 3. Open Doors & t+ i ado s��_._��_ ,_ �� , 38 27 4, Special Provil Checks----,--- 734 301 5. Assists Rendered to Other Agencies Y..--- 39 36 6. Aid to Citizens ���am� ��.���. ._�... ��. 47 38 7. Warrants Served--------------------------- 0 1 8.. 'field Interrogation Reports--- -----­---- 29 20 9_ Misc. Complaints Rem;'d & investigated-- a. vestigated---a. Animal- - W- .--- - 4 3 b. Abandoned Auto--------------------------- 1 1 c. Assaults Aggravated-------------- 0 2 d. Assaults, Simple-­._ _­­�­­. 0 2 e E3tzrglary������ �.�._ :����.a��� 3 5 f. Civil-------------------------------- 1 1 g. Disorderly Conducts.------------...-- 1 0 h. Domestic---:---- ---------------W--- 1, o i. Drunks--W-W-- m 2 2 j Fire---------------- ---------------- 1 1 k. Forgery, E:mY.aezzlement:, & Fraud----- 3 5 1. Juvenile-------- ----------------am 21 9 m. Larceny of Bicycles---------------- 3 2 n. Larceny of Autos-----------:-------- 1 0 o. Larenc,y of over $50.0Cv 5 3 p. Larceny of Under $5000------,--- 9 13 q„ Lost & trussing Persons----I-------- 1 3 r. Properly Found-------------- 2 6 s Property %.,ost-® m 0 2 t.. Prowlers-------------------- 5 12 ix_ Suicides-------------------------- 0 0 vo Sxsp.Persons,Autos,Circumstances-® 9 4 W. traffic- 0 3 x,. Vandal' .sm- _ ®_ - -- 4 11 y. All Other Misc.Compl.Rec" & Inv.m 32 46 TOTALS, Misc.Comps.Rec°d & Inv. 113 142 GRAND TCYVAL Activities & Compl�Rec a d Inv.- , 1,062 762 Last monthnis Mont UNPAID OVERTIME WORKED By OFFICERS-------------- 61 hours 57 hours page 5 ,f)L'IC 1 EPARTM i '�. MONTHLY REPORI` EVALUATIOIN REPORT OF STOLEN xii3L RECOVERED PROPERTY-INCLUDING CHECKS PROPERTY' STOLEN, 'Val ------$—1788--L9— PROPERTY 788.69PROPERTY LOST, Value_.-...---,--. 161.e0 PROPER7`Y RECOVERED, Value ��r,._ _,_� _� .� �.-l'I. 64 PROPERTY PO".)" 'D, -Value......,.,..•_ - ....... -- ��.50 CHE1;YS, Value Lost—--_r _ ------ --------------- CHECKS, ._._-_.,_-,_-CHECKS, Value Recovered--------------------------------------------- ;_ 5.00 TOTAL VALISE, Property Lost or Stolen ---_,_-_----.y:----.. TOTAL VALUE, Property round & Recovered------;. 2 i 1 GAIN XXXXX FOR 11.A,ST MONTH.-------------------------------------------------,. 628.12 LOSS F'OR THIS MONTH------------------------------------------------. $ril`�,�4 BREAKDOWN OF HOURS - PER ACTIVITY Regular overtime Regular" Overtime' -Accident 'Inv. 45 0 identification 4 0 Traffic Patrol 140 16 Jail Duties 22 2 Foot Patrol 0 0 warrant Service 1 0' criminal ;env. 102 18 Special Detail 12 0 Emcort Service 6 0 Other Activity 0 0 Fire 1 01 Prowl 252 13 Communications 0 0 Training 80 20- Photography 0 4 Schaal Patrol 0 0 Records 80 4 Report Writing 46 144 *-Indicates that overtime denoted is worked by officers as a matter of course and no compensation is expected for such duties. This breakdown does not include the hours of the Chief of Police' END OF THE MONTH REPORT FOR PIAY_ 1961 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY. CHIEF OF POLICE Hugh H. Wilkinson - s . Page 6 x. AS To: Mayor and Council Re: `-ain Street Fssessments z,ssessments to Nain Street were based on`a report from Pioneer National Title Insurance Company, in which the front footage of each lot was given. These front footages were the legally owned parcels of property and, therefore, included easements'. Easements affect the following parcels of land: 1. J. C. Josephson and Bertha Josephson, Rook 474, 'Page 257, Cctober 25, 1962. Tax Lot _23-24; 2S1-2AC-800 By deed recorded September 14, 1939, in Book 183, page 457, a 20-foot easement for footpath was granted to the State Highway Commission. 2. Laura C. Johnson, Bock 387, page 5911 C-ctober 309 1956. Tax Lot - 23-24; 2Sl-2Ab-3600 A portion of the described ownership (to-wit: the southwesterly 40 feet)', has been dedicated to the Public as S. W. Commercial Street. If this footage is excluded from, the assessment, the front footage on S. W. Main Street should read 200 feet. 3. Cregcn ;electric Railway Co., Book 77, page 93• Tax Lot - 23-24; 2S1-25AB-5550 By instrument recorded January 23, 1940, in Book 186,, page 561, Deed Records, the Cregon Electric'caihay Co.`, granted a :perpetual easement to Washington County for the maintenance of a public road. This road*aay _occuFies 3e.4 feet of the frontage previously quoted for this ownership and if not included in the assessment' would reduce the front footage on this tract to 44.6 feet. 11111 1:s I=111112111 To; A'�yor and Council ` ne: Yain Street Assessments Page 2 4. Curtis C. Tigard, Pcck 378, Page 499 Tax Lot 23-24; 2S1 2A-500 By Flat known as Burnham Tract recorded October, 1906,,a,20-foot wide strip, of land dedicated to the public. If this footage is excluded frcm the assessment, the front footage shall be 76.3 feet. It is recommended the following :adjustments in the S. ',,. ',.'--in Street ImprovFment District_tsse-sment be made._ Old Footage 'Adjusted Footage Old Assessment New Assessment J. C. Josephson 133.82' 113.82' ;2,494.54 t32,121.72 Laura C. Johnson 240.00' 200' 14,473.85 $3+728.21 OregonElectric 75' 44.6' $1.398.08 � 831.39 Curtis C. 'Tigard 90' 76.3' $1,677.69 �11,422.31 Respectfhlly mitt Keith C. Thompson City Engineer