City Council Packet - 09/12/1966 TIC:APJ) CI ,Y 0_11fICI1,
t,?:.:'PLPdG SEFTEMIIE'2 12, 1966
AGENDA:
1 . CALL S;; ilk i ._-'.
2. POLL CALL;
., T_'I,EIK.V OF
A. APPROVAL t.. M-TNI S ?;
5. . O P:tt.`, 1,1 ,fl T'l
(a) Financial
(h) Building
(c) vol ice
('1! 'Sewer
£i. t'Z YTNG OF THE .BILLS
J7' t .I1kr.:F;MTti1 i.i.r7;`TICp7;
8. AGPEEMLN'1' b'Ctli 1,CiAN WITH P'.IAIr.'Y'a"7T OT Ii:)TJSIN(:;
AND T)PBAN DSVEL01,141:NT FCR OF t PTIL MTNARY FLAN`FOP
SANITARY r.,? SY .I3;}
(a) Authorizing Payor- t.o sign aureemE.nt on behalf
of the City
9. A0R!:FY18.^I1`. QILTH S r F.NS, 'fiioMPSON, 10.31,yA:I AND 11,1 1--33, ,y"c
AFFLCTUATL SANITARY SEWER SYSTi:M STUDY
(a) Authorize Mayor to sign agreement on behalf
of the City'
10. AIVPiLXATIONS WILLIAMS
(a) Public Hearing - 9:00 P.1..
(b) ` Adoption of Ordinance
11. AGREEMENT WITH COLUMBIA RE-1;0-N ASSOCIATION C.- GOVERNbIENTS
ow
(a) 'Authorize Mayor to aign a r._._.uent on behalf of
the- CiLy
12. DISCUSSION OF WATER FTNCTION IN TIGARD
13. (:P1iYIR 13IJST.Ni;SS
14. CALL TO TIIE AUDIENCE FOR THOSr DESIRINC TO SPEAK
15. AW OUP14RENT
I TY C O U N C I L
P.EGULAR COUNCT,L MEETING, MONDAY, SEPTEMPER 12, 1966, 7:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL Present: -Mayor E.G. Kyle, Councilmen F. H.
Bergmann, C.E. Klock, Sr., Harvey L. Knauss,
John P. Well, Attorney'F.A. Anderson, City
Administrator Robert K. Logan; Keith C. Thompson,
City Engineer; Monnie S. Andrews, City Recorder
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. MINUTES, for approval August 22 and August 29, 196-
Approved.
4. FINANCIAL AND DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS FOR AUGUST 1966
(a) Submitted and made a part of the record.
5. PAYING OF THE BILLS
Approved by unanimous vote.
6. CITY COUNCILMAN ELECTIONS Nominations should be made not later
than 10 days before the Election or
not more than 90 days prior to the
Election.
7. AGREEMENT FOR INTEREST FREE LOAN WITH DEPARTMENT OF 'OUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOP,,IENT FOR PREPARATION OF PRELIMINARY FLAP? iOR SANITARY
SEWER:SYSTEM STUDY
(a) Authorize Mayor to sign agreement on behalf of the
City of ,Tigard
Motion: Councilman Klock, Seconded by Councilman Well
Approved by unanimous vote.
S. AGREEMENT WITH STEVENS, -THOMPSON, RUNYAN AND RIES TO AFFECTUATE '
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM STUDY
(a) Authorize Mayor to sign agreement on behalf of the
City of Tigard
Motion: Councilman Bergmann, Seconded byCouncilr,n
Klock
Approved by(unanimous vote.
Page 1 - 9/12/66
9. ANNEXATION ORDINANCE - An Ordinance Annexing to the City of
Tigard Lands of Henry Williams and Joyce A.
William, being a portion of Tax Lot 600,
in Sec. 34, T1S, R1W, W.M., Washington
County, Oregon
Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M.
Hearing Closed.
(a) Ordinance No. 66-37 - ordinance read "three times by
title and number
(b) -Motion: Councilman Klock, Seconded by Councilman
Bergmann
Adopted by unanimous vote.
10. AGREEMENT WITH COLUMBIA REGION ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
(a) Authorize mayor to sign agreement on behalf of the
City of Tigard
Motion: Councilman Klock, Seconded by Councilman
Knauss
(b) Appoint Mayor Kyle as delegate to the Assembly
Motion: Councilman Bergmann, Seconded by Council-
man Klock
(c) Appoint Councilman Bergmann as an alternate Represent-
ative
Motion: ' Councilman Klock, Seconded by Councilman Knauss
Approved by unanimous vote.
11. WATER FUNCTION IN'TIGARD
The City Administrator stated that the,matter of the water
function is still before us, and that no action has been taken
by the Water Board. The water function needs to be expanded to
meet the explosive urban ,growth we are encountering. The
special districts are not equipped organizationally, statutorily,
or economically to meet the problems of urban growth.
There are two alternatives available to the Mayor and Council
at this time.
Page 2 - 9/12/66
1. The City of Tigard could withdraw from the special
district and split the assets, based upon assessed
valuation. This withdrawal would require a Public
Hearing.
2. Joint management of the Tigard,Water District and the
City of Tigard. The,City could withdraw and split the
assets, ;within'the city limits, on paper only, designate
the Water Board to act in its behalf and appoint the
City Administrator to manage both organizations. The
Tigard Water Board did not approve this plan.
It was moved by Councilman Bergmann, seconded by
Councilman Klock, and unanimously carried that Council
direct the City,Attorney to draft an Ordinance to
withdraw from the Tigard Water District, setting a
public hearing for 8:00 P.M,, October 10, 1966,
and directing the City Administrator to notify the
Water District of this public hearing.
(see attached for more detail)
12. ADJOURNMENT: 8:30 P.M.
Page 3 9/12/66
FINA`T.IAL STATE S.ANT
t, Au� ast 31, 196
PEVENUES
11)66 7 C€7 _!NT -Y-2 A T
GENERAL FUND DUDGET 1 ONTH DATE
Available Cash 7/7_/157 ;19,0C)") . -0 $23,757.
Property Taxes 19,000. -0- -0-
Building Permits 3,--00. $2,21.5. J1, 331.
Franchises 14, 380. 75. 7,937
Liquor Allocation 6,600. 1,90:3. 2,026.
Business L• censes 5,500. 1,4c-4.
Fines & Forfeitures 'j.1, 100. 543. 2,204.
Other Revenues 950. 153. 461.
Transfer From Other Funds -10, 156. -0- -0-
Total General Fund $92,494. $6, 376. $46, 364.
SETIAGE DISPOSAL FUND
Available Cash as of 7/1/67 $23,000. -0- $31,701:
Sewer Service Charges 36,000. $ 2,426. 6,931
ConnectionFees & Misc. Income 30,000. 23,764. 33,564.'
Transfer From Other Funds -0- -0- -0-
Total Sewage
0TotalSewage Disposal Fund $89,000. $26,190. $72,196.
STATE TAX 'STREET AND ROAD FUND
Cash on Hand as of 7/1/67 $25,000 -0 $26,718.
State Gas Tax 20,852. $500. 9,696.
County Road Tax' 3 948. -0 -0-
Transfer From Other 'Funds -0- 0 -0-
otal Street and Road Fund $49,, 800.= $500. $36,214.
BANCROFT BONDS 1 & 2. & INTEREST
cash on Hand as of 7/1/67 $ 5,222 0 $ 2,1'37.
Cash With County Treas. 1, 103:: -0-
Assessment
0 Assessment 1 & 2 2'.675. $101. 346.
Interest 750. 22. 62.
Transfer From Other Funds i' -0- -0 -0-
Total Bancroft Bonds $9,750. $123. $3,200.
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
Available Cash on Hand 7/1/67 $6,700.< -0 $11,402.
with County Treasurer
Taxes 15,070. -0 -0-
Transfer From Sewage Disposal Fund 12, 370- -0-` 12, 370.
Total obligation Bond Fund $34,240. -0-
$23,772.
Prig 5'_:C ri Tw'
7l.rr,>1,;
Genflr.al FLzncl
or.
Mlyor and. Council.
tiunir .pal O.c _ J
u _ �
00. ? 7. 7.
qE1, 1
AdMinist
traA-ve "ok-pt. 22,P,92. r tiC?1
, 3C:3.
}
Building Dept. 2,725. 195.Dopt--.Planning &<".,o i7ct
nl [�.
J-.G
i rary
2,22-5.
225.
0 '. 34k:)
Police Dept. �"1,97,^. � pl� �
i`7on•-Departmental
,5, 9
1.9, 11 1, 1�,< 2,72.1 .
Contingency
2' _
Transfer To Other Funds -0- -Cl-
0- 01- -0-
Total General fund - -
502, 9,, . -;7,20/' ;l ,
-7 03L:
Se acre Disposal Fund
Operating & faint. .;;72,883. 81r., 17«.
Contingenc�-
Transfer to G.O. Bonds 3,370. -0- _0_
1
Transfer to Other Funds 2, 370. -0-
Total Sewage Disposal Fund $89,000. :^ 174. $6,1899.
��,.
.
State 'Tax Street and Road Fund
Public Works . 10,004. ;a 57
County Roads 3 •7s= .
94S. J40. -38.
Park Impro:%em nt^ 5, 125. 2x0. 27�.
Contingency Fund 123. 20_
Transfer To Other Funds --0-
-o-
Total State Tax and 'Road Fund -o_ -a=
<rrg�800. y;2,067.
3,470.
General Obligation Bonds & Interest
1960 Series - Dec. $3,7.50.
1951 Series Sept. -0- -0-
1956 Series - Jury 1, 175. -0- -0-
;L7, 345. -0-
Total G.O. Bonds & Interest -0-
521.,770. _0_ -0-
Bancroft Bonds ,1 & 2 & Interest
Bancroft 11 $2, 250. -0_
Bancroft #2 -0-
'Total Bancroft Bonds 7,500. -0_ 0-
$9, 750. -A -0-
tonsil
DUITIDINC P,]RE l'11S - AUGUST.
OW7.MEMS/CON 'PACTOR ADDFIESS TYPE'
Girocl'$/C.E.John ;onst.Co. S.W.MainSt. Additi `on $ 6,7AL— 740.hT
Alexand`r Const.Co. 12020 S.W.Summercrest Etas i dence 17, 157 .
sic:��
Alexander Const.Co. 119,15 S.W.£urlcrest Re.. e13,612.
Annand 1nc•e
,.Doom/Architects 131117 S.W.Pacific .Hiway Remodeling 1-,000.
Warren v.Popo 12010 S.1^T.119th Residence 12,974.
Ivan E.Snook. 11390 S.W. 94th
Fend, 316.
Luminite Sign Co. 12525 S.W. Main Sign 150.
Luminite Sign Co. 12525 S.W.Main Sign 400.
OregonSign & Neon Corp. 8847 S.W.Center Ct. Sign 150.
Alexander Const.Co. 11400 S.W. 121st St. Residence 15,021.
Vance R. Lee 7.0865 S.W. F.wy.217 Residence 7.3,065.
Ii.A.Anderson/Power Brakes Bonita & 72nd
912
Wm. A. Lehr 11634 S.W. Pacific Hiway Sign 2Warehouse 740,20000..
Stan Adkins Walnut
.'
✓Talnut & Grant Apts.15 Unit 153,431 .
Vance R. Lee 12575 S.W-Brookside Residence 20, 850.
Alexander Const. 11720 S.W.Burlcrest Residence 13,612.
Alexander Const. 11925 S.W.Burlheight Residence 13,612.
Klock & Son 8862 S.W.Center Ct. Prof.Bldg' 9,446.
TOTAL` $1,012,648.
POLICE DEPARTr,ENT
CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT FOR YONTh OF AUGUST ,1966
TRAFFIC ARREST ANALYSIS
Last Month This month
1. Speeding -------------------------------- ---- 57 29
2. Reckless Driving ------------------------------ 1 1
3. Driving While Intoxicated ---- ------------------------------ 3 2
4 Disobey Traffic Signal or Stop-
----------- 5 0
5. Veh. & Oper.Lic. Violation -------------------- 7 14
-6. Imp.-Def.Equip. (Lights,Brakes, Mufflers) ----_ 6 6
7. Illegal Parking ------------------------ 3 5
8. All Other Traffic Violations ------------------ 14 8
TOTALS ------------------------ 96 65
WARNINGS Given to Traffic Violators --------------- 82 145
RADAR WARNING CITATIONS ----------- 88
TRAFFIC ACCIDENT SU1,14ARY
Last Month This Month
Accidents `-------------------------------------- 10 13
Injuries --------------------------------------- 15 9
Fatalities -----=----=-----------------------=-- 1 0
Hit`& Run Accidents ------------------- ---- --- 0 1
MUNICIPAL COURT REPORT
Last Month This Month
Cases Processed Through Cort ------------------ 77 50
-Fines &-Bail Forfeitures ----------------------- $1.058.00 $615.00
Amount Suspended from Fines --------------- $75.00 $35.00
Cases Pending Last Day of Month ----------------- 41 18
POLICE CAR EXPENSE-MILEAGE-GAS-02L-REPAIRS
nitMiles Driven Fimal Miles 5asiUsed ;Oil Used Repairs Re .Maint.`
. : 2 5. 7, 5.2 9—a-E- 7b.53
$226.55 $7.20
Page 1
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
UNIFORM CLA"SIFICATION OFFENSES CASES ARRESTS OFFENSES CASES ARRESTS
OF OFFENSES KNOWN CLEARED KNOWN CLEARED
art asses East Montl his Month
1. Criminal Homicide
(a)Murder & Non-negligent
Manslaughter --- ---- 0 0 0 0 0 0
(b)Manslaughter by Negli- -
gence ------------------------ 1 1 1 0 0 0
2. Rape ----- --- --- ----- 0 0 0 0 p p
3. Robbery ------ ----- 0 0 0 0 0 0
4. Aggravated Assault ------ 0 1 0 0 0 0
5. Larceny-Theft (except Auto)--- — — —
(a) Over $50.00 -- --- ----- 1 0 0 3 p
(b) Under $50.00 ----------------- - a-- 1 1 -6 17Ty
6. Auto Theft ------------ ----- 2 O 0 1 1 i
7. Burglary-Breaking & 'Entering - 2 0 0 1 0 0
Totals, Part I Classes --- 12 3 2 11 5 5
Part lasses
8. Other Assaults --------------- 1 1 1 0 0 0
9. Forgery & Counterfeiting --_-_ '0 0 0 0 0 0
10. Embezzlement & Fraud --------- 14 0 0 T8 14 0
11. Stolen Prop.-Buying, Rec.,
Possessing -------------------
4 4 4 0 0
12. Weapons-Carrying, Possessing,
Concealing ----- ____-__---=-- 0 0 0 1 1 1
13. Prostitution & Commercialized — — —
Vice ----- --- 0 0 0 0 O 0
14. Sex Offenses (except 2 & 13)-- 0 $ 0 1 0
15.' Offenses against Family & - 0
Children --------------------- 0 0 0 0 0 0
16. Narcotic Drug Laws ----------- _0 0 0 0 0 0
17. Liquor Laws --- -- - -- 0 '0 0 0 0 —0
18. Drunkeness ------------------- "f 2 2 1 1 i
19. Disorderly,Conduct ----------- 1 T T 2 2 2
20. Vagrancy --------------------- 0 0 0 0 0 0
21. Gambling --------------------- 00 0 0 0
22. Driving While Under the Influ- — — —
ence.'of Intox. Liguor --------
3 3 3 2 2 2
23. Violation of Road & Driving —
Laws "------------ --- - 68 68 68 40 40 40
24. Illegal Parking -------------- 7 j 7 3-
5 5
25. Traffic & M.V. Laws ---------- 27 27 27 20 00 20
26. All other Offenses ----------- 1
—
Totals,, Part II Classeg___ 124 110 110 ' 93 88 74
GRAND TOTALS, Part I & II Classes-- 137 115 112 104 93 79
age
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
0. UNIFORM CLASSIFICATION -
—OFFENSES CASES
OF OFFENSESCLEARED
ARRESTS OFFENSES CASES ARRESTS
KNObdN
ar asses _( reB�akdown) _`� KNO'rIN CLEARED
Last bIonth
Larceny-Theft (Except Auto) This Morith�
(A) Pocket Picking --------- 0Q
(B) Purse Snatching _ 0 0 0 0
(C) Shoplifting - -_- 0 0 0 0 0
(D) Thefts from Autos --- 1 1 1 3 1
(except,E) ------ 1 1 0 -
(E) Thefts of Auto Parts - - 0 0
and Accessories --------- 0 0 0
(F) Thefts Of Bicycles2 a - 0 0
(G) Thefts from Buildings
(Except C & H) 1 1 1 0
3
(H) Thefts from any Coln - - _ 0
Operated Machines ------ 0 0 0
(I) All other larceny, - O 0 0
Theft ------------------ 2 p 0 _
Totals, Part I
Classes (Breakdown) -_-- 7 3 3
9 4 4
Page 3
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY RFrORT
ARREST OF MINORS
-TRAFFIC ARRESTS BY AGES OF MINORS
OFFENSES 15 & 16 17 18 19 20 Totals
Under
Speeding —------ - —2 --_3_ h _ 4 2 _ 5
Reckless Driving - _ 1
Disobey Traffic Signal
or Stop Sign _ __ _ - 0
Operators Lie. Viol---
ations ------------ 2 1 1 4
Veh.Lic. Violations - 0
Defective Equipment -- 1 1 2 - 4
Driving While Intox, - O
Other Traffic Viol. -- 1 1 2 1 5
TOTALS -------- - 3 $ 8 5 _
TOTALS LAST MONTH 0 3 9 16 4 3 35
MISCELLANEOUS ARRESTS BY AGES OF JUVENILES
OFFENSES 10 & 11-12 13-14 15 16 17 Totals
Under
Burglary--------------
Larceny---------------
----=--------Larceny--------------- 2 2 4
Bad Checks ----------- 0
Auto Theft ----------- 1 _' 1
Assaults ------------- 0;
LiquorLaws ---------- 0
Drunkeness ----------- _ 0`
Disorderly Conducst---- 0
Vandalism ---=-------- 1 1
Poss Stolen Prop. --- 0 ,
Curfew & Truancy ----- 1 1 2 ',
Runaways & ERcapees--- 0
Misc. Criminal ---=--- 1 22 2 v
7<'
TOTALS- - --- 2 5 2 6 - 15
TOTALS LAST
_t MONTH-------- -- 4 2 3 1 - 10
Page 4
POLICE DEPARTMEP3T MOMTHLY REPORT
ACTIVITY REPORT
nth
1.. Accidents Investigated -------------------- 9 9
2. Vacation House Checks ----------------------------- 103 74
3. Open Doors & Windows --------------------------- 23 40
4. Special Prowl Checks ------------------------------ 208 460
5. Assists Rendered to Other Agencies ---------------- 32 49
6. Aid to Citizens ----------------------------------- .51 83
7. Warrants Served ----------------------------------- 2 0
8. Field Interrogation Reports ----------------------- 29 17
9. Misc. Complaints Recd & 'Investigated -------------
a. Animal -------- --- --- --- ---- 4 8
b. Abandoned Auto -------------------------- 0 3
c. Assaults, Aggravated ------------- 0 0
d. Assaults, Simple ------------------------ 1 0
e. Burglary -------------------------------- 2 1
f. Civil ----------------------------------- 0
g. Disorderly Conduct J
h. Domestic -------------------------------- 0 2
i. Drunks ------ ------------------ ---- 2 1
J. Fire ------------------------------------ 2 3
k. Forgery, Embezzlement,&Fraud ------------ 14 18
1. Juvenile -------------------------------- 15 14
M. Larceny of Bicycles -------=------------- 2 0
m. Larceny of Autos - __ 3
- - _- 1
o. Larceny of over $50-00 ---= -_-- _-__ 2 3
p. Larceny of Under $50.00 ----------------- 3, 6
q'. Lost & missing Persons ------------------ 2 3
r. Property Found --------------------------- 0 0
s. Property Lost --------------------------- 0 0
t. Prowlers -------------------------------- 4
u.. Suicides -------------------------------- 0 3
0
v Susp. persons, Autos,; Circumstances --_-_ 9 4
wTraffic --------------------------------- 2 2
X. Vandalism ------- ------ - -- 10 2
y. All other Misc.' Compl'. Recd & Inv. -- -_ 14 19
TOTALS, Misc. Comps. Recd & Inv.---- 95 95
GRAND TOTAL Activities & Compl. Rec'd'Inv.--- 552 827
UNPAID OVERTIME WORKED BY OFFICERS ------------------------ s Menth
130 59
Page 5 —
POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
EVALUATION REPORT OF STOLEN AND RECOVERED PROPERTY-INCLUDING CHECKS
PROPERTY STOLEN, Value --- -_ --_ -__ ---- $ 1 456.32
PROPERTY LOST, Value ------------------=----------------------------- $ None
PROPERTY RECOVERED, Value -----------------------$ 1,243.05
PROPERTY FOUND, Value -- -----------------.,__---$ one
CHECKS, Value Lost ---- _--_- _
--- --- _-- --- --- --_--- •$ ..450.78
CHECKS, Value Recovered --------------
TOTAL VALUE, Property Lost or Stolen ------------------------------ $ 10907.10
TOTAL VALUE, Property Found & Recovered -----------$ 1,611.13
LOSSPOR LAST MONTH ------------------------------------- $ 469.11
LOSS FOR THIS MONTH -- 77-97_
BREAKDOWN OF,HOURS - PER ACTIVTTY
Regular Uvertime Regular Overtime
Accident Inv. 20 0 Identification 0 0
Traffic Patrol 210 10 Jail Duties4 0
Foot Patrol 0 0 Warrant Service 0 0
Criminal Inv. 30 0 Special Detail 0 �5*
Escort Service 0 0 Ot'r'er Activity 8 10*
Fire 4 0 Prowl 462 49
Communications 0 0 Training 30 10*
Photography 0, 0 School Patrol 0 0
Records 20
Report Writing 18 55*
*Indicates that overtime denoted is worked by officers as a matter of course and no
compensation is expected for such duties.
This breakdown does not include the' hours' of the Chief of Police
END OF THE MONTH REPORT FOR AUGUST 1966
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:
CHIEF OF,POLICE
Hugh H. Wilkinson
Page 6
q.
___�:...• _7.].�a. -:re2,`- .. t..-[ ..+CC>_2 0
1..�.r 32 >,rt)n
,.
3 22 i� _ C?'" ctl'o'_in
' 19.7
run ccs sric—
ROW ac c 204 1_'� t ii7il S Ie31L'. C�n�
22
ZL•7 gni-a('"C- 1'.7
Final 5.0
7 e~rc ?.nra_ee s^—
2
To: Mayor E: Council August 17, 1.966
ror several m.enl:lls now discussion and acticns hive occurr^ 1 concerning
the water Function in Tigard. "Phe followin<_` has i0^nn -rr°'7 1r.r?d L:o out-
line the problems encount_erc:d.
The -City of Tigard has two spec.i al eater districts wi:-t b in i.ts corl.orate
limits. The T ^t'z.,ge-r 'later District has arproximat.='lV 31,-. of its assess^d
valuation and %he "'icrard Thal. r Di1t:c.;_ct= ap roe-:imacel�, �0'; of its assessed
valuation in Tigard. The Water_ District uses tine Por.tlan_1 Full
Run Water supply as its source while the Tigard Water District uses welts
as its source. -
The Metzger Water District is extremely lacking in line size with the
largest line in its internal system being 8 inches. The bull; of the
system is in 2", four inch and 6" lines. The Cascade Industrial Park
and. the Bonita industrial, area is serviced by skx inch lines resulting
in extremely high` insurance premiums . The Tigard Shopping Plaza, F'red
Meyers as well as other businesses in the vicinity of-21.7 and 99W are
in similar circumstances. The nIetzger Water District has a class 9
fire rating--Class 1. being the lowest and Class 10 bei-ng the highest.
The Tigard Water District with its well water source has some large
lines but for the most part is similar in line size to-Metzcxer. The
Tigard Water District obtains its water from wells located in the,>
Little Bull and 'Bull ')tilt. areas'. They have reservoirs located at Bull
Mt. ; Little Bull Mt. Baylor Street and in the Walnut Street area. The
Tigard Water District rating is Class 7.
The water rates for Tigard Mater District are quite. a bit lower than
the Metzger Water rates.
In early spring, the Mayor and Council. authorized 'Mayor; Kyle to present
a proposal to the Tigard Water District calling for dissolution of the
district and providing for the City to take over the water function.
The Tigard Water District felt' that 'this procedure was complicated due'
to the fact that the ;City ;of Tigard would have to withdraw prior to the
election. If the election then failed there could be some confusion.
The Board then proposed that the City attempt to annex the entire limits
of the Tigard Water District. This was placed to the voters in May
and was soundly trounced. G
The matter of the water function is still before us today and it is
still as -mportant as it was six months ago. Gerber Legenday Blades
k
11 MINOR I I III 1. 11 1111,11 11
!1 110111,
i
j!
I
t
To gator Cnunci.l.
Paco 2
1!tcrttni. 17, 1n A,J
in the Lon] c, J_nt LL,'t✓r_J al a l C?(1 1.cio.:lP.li 1_V „] nf)(1
in i.n Utc 2Cn i:l I .l.L1Ti i i i. VC cr
''1` r a r
they T
fley .7 TC,L?.l.:I 1) t:� ,V1 A1CY 1
.:l yn�� �n -
, i 7 ), n ; n 1-7 :'i:C^`_-rr r.:'.17 l:;. n-:n,,, in—
dL1S i ry ,rl t.
i - ,J 1.nC� �?� l pt n ,,- n-,nt c7
applo 111c L ,1,7 j l]_l.l -.oiZ 1 i] r C.tl 1..1: r?hl C„ rnt
ConStruc to:o 1 'J I ja t')n i:•7 t or•'�. , TTnI n Z.' ,
7 brr)17rj1i]
j fO i:hC' dir -1, 1.h..i11Ji`7(. - 1� r ,311,1� C?1Z l1.11"il ��n ?_1 he
C_'.Ces S lvC11jr T11 cr11.
i
t F:-acentlv
lAe CntlnCl._1
lut7r10 ?CCi il^ i'ayp; iO rCCL1C 1_ t11 ^iC
District to Cit"
Fc,.. that, a 7 1ZC1�
Hu ].l.er anal. •i 2rwt Avnnn. COUI." i CC)1 t rL G L .' 'o n :.. / )1..
n ,, ... n �nn1
:
Ili 1 Strect.
Th1S-VCul,,j br-, a __'re p:Loi=^Ct.)_()n _Din only an,_': a?r>L?j..c7 _ZOi: (.1:T?- ._iOIl�eSt1C
uses. Tho and Counrl i. F1 ,h n
ZC; rlCt C_,,.: n ill T'1",nc-i tat ly
coni ,_ac With .;:n-1u t_:: i 1 1,.t
i .� „ .j.or ' llnm to i'., Want: t lla Cost
C
Of h. J.roa^c.1_, Y.nc..l:ucl ng ]ntca est, and for 1.hr City to hav 50,5 of the
actual coni ructl.on coast J,-ac3, a the ^n.:1 0{ C] n
< 37 s. 'hi. y ,7as bas;;d
on ill^ id( 1_ 1"lat lir 1.2
I1 .aZ .-1 n 7n> > n
i c' r as 1 a,1T r]t'a l:3 fat t_Or
in dc';,nl o� .a,7?n t: o
a ..:LlttJt ^ -•J-t �CI" ou-,-CC'_._, ana
t On TuE.'-'rla_T, lllru t 91_11, thr, caVn
an i. C ..l /� r'-'i) t :r 1 7 requested
the Ticlar:.l:}7'1tor District au _:1�r a' .1_
1
ihlu lane - CJ 1 trl i Lt -c1lc - t _C.r So
that
C.c111:i t con rur`� 1, ale i.r� 1
the mat, er undo]-- a vis^r 1n-. In
_r <ac rc Mn 11.owev Cr,
the action o the roar,,-1 ",%rac revoalecl to
F_ thatJ c.,nnl r e qu _s t. �tile
rj '
Metzger T7'l;_n F' .L�.l.r L] 1.[:'a , tril t Cil ri^ � �., r.
e-1 'C.^ ha` area, :o collstrur..t
the line from the 1licl-"1 -d ',"7"1::."7 7,...,i:r?C 1ZnC1 a IL111 1i r ]. clllt'i 72nl Street.
The M tz9Q.r 'rater District all^ 't I1 f.11c? rla.^ 1J,^._ nl t r
f �n 1___,. �tant about construction
of such a lin._. 2111i71"Ll,- sTYOLll � In a T,'n e c 11.,s
- 1 e, (�n"1. t0 complicate
the
ClP_VE loprtlCn't 0 our i.ndtl t]r1 1l_ ,- 'tJa:,n. Lt t;7aS rCl^,.ort CCt A).,• the news-
paper that -tile "oonsr?nsu O i.11n -.lina�rd 1,1, .-"r ?J1., iiC'• ?3c ar7 �.;Zs
o beep
the City oj_ t iC7crC� 011t Oi U11C 1+71'GCC :Iter
Over 500 Special service c1:istr.tccs are op-rating in t-.he F°ortlancl
Metropolitan area. Bach o 1> Esc cli:stxi.ci_s are empi�,•Jere 1 to legislate
and to toy.
Lee purpose o the listr.,ct is r^cogni crl 1_y most conle
in public acun�nistration as being te'-porary 'one pro,ri,,. nu urban
services until I _Torr=.ation of a larger governmental unit. is an area
becomes more Urban and more densely Populated, the purpose-_ of a special
district becomes d.:m.i_nisherl in that its authority is limited to a special
,.,
area - 'sanitary, rater, lighting, etc. The city government is the local
government that is charged by the state statutes with overall authority
' regarding municipal services.
l? It, i^ responsible to provide the basic
municipal services, police, fire, water., sewer, lighting and 'the most
important function of planning, -to its residents. A special district
is not empowered to :Function 132Sronc7 its purpose.
To: Mayor & Council
I August 17, 1.966
Page 3
4
f
{ The problem at tili�� time Appear o lie trlalt it i_S difficult i ,_' not
S imPOssible to ash a porson to Cil^C01vc, his organization. The Met,,,ger
and tY1^_ `_iaard water
DisL, ictr t.aLe I =-oLid_-I,i our area jgj.th �}'tv I7 CeSuaYV
water from - hich has sprung t o initial (evelormeI1'i Of our area. Tile
water function now, however, needs to he e},'pancl?d to t`ecrt thio explosive
i+ urban growth, we are now encoun:eri11J. The spec.i a1. dir,trlct
s are not
-`jI equipped organizationally, statutori.lt,, or economically to meet the
problems of urban growth.
4 '
Several �,Teel;s ago I discussed with Clarence Nicoli, the Chairman of the
Tigard Water District, the problems of the water function. At thatt-tine
' Mr. Nicoli suggested the possibility of hiring jointly an engineer who
could function for both the city and the water district. I mentioned
i to Mr. Nicoli the possibility of joint management of the city and Nater
district ,•Th.ich is allowec'.i under the state statutes. Unrle.r this plan I
j would be the administrator for both the Tigard Grater District and the
! City of Tigard. This would in a very real.. sense combine the planning
and development of our area. This thought was presented to the Tigard
' Water Dist'r'ict Board on august 9th and the board stated they would
investigate this further. Before presenting this thought formally to
the Mayor and Council I felt that there
should be some registration of
thought given by the water board members if the subject was to be pursued
further.
Some ty e oz R
p positive action by Che Mayor and Council is going to have
1 to be taken in the water :function. The Tigard area appears to be
3
exploding more and more with industrial, commercial and residential
growth. The Tigard Water District Chairman told me that a <new source
j of water must be obtained to augment the wells within two years., The
City of Lake Oswego has indicated theirwillingness to contract for
the sale of water to surrounding areas. ; Some type of study with a
decision must be forthcoming regarding .this water source within the
next 60 days. The City of Lake Oswego cannot wait longer than that
without delaying their much needed'`improvement inprocurement of water
sources.
It would appear that there are two alternatives available to the 'Mayor
and Council at this time.
i Alternative �;-1: The City of Tigard would pull out of the Tigard Water
District, distribute the assets based upon assessed valuation and enter
full scale into the water function.
There would be some problems tinder this }procedure ,and it could possibly
necessitate going to the Was County Board of Commissioners to
adjudicate any conflict that might arise from a withdrawal.;
,
i,
a
' To: Mayor & Council
Page 4August 17, 1966
Alternative ,,„2
Joint manaSemont of the Tigard Tlater District and the City of Tictard.
Under this procedure the City Administrator_ would be appointed as the
administrator of. the Tigard Water District as xae.11 as the administrator
of the City of Tigard. The assets of the district would be withdrawn
} b the Cit on
{ Y: y paper from the district so that in the e-vent at a future
F time the joint
operation became inoperatablc then th,� assets would
previously have been distributed.
Each of the alternatives has its good and bad points. By simply with-
drawing, -the city could disrupt the water function to the point that
water would riot be available for either_ governmental jurisdiction to
expand into the undeveloped areas. Under alternative number 2, the
joint management could function only if the City Council and the
{ Tigard Water District cooperate. The City Administrator should be
given .the same powers by the Tigard water District, he now receives
from the City of Tigard. Any less authority in regard to the operation
of the Tigard Water District would certainly complicate the matter and
:{ l could make it inoperable from an administrative standpoint.
.I
The Mayor and Council are probably wondering if the City Administrator
has "rocks in his head” wanting to manage both the City and the water_
District. To this I would state that presently the City of Tigard is
in the water business. We are constantly meeting and 'talking utiliti.
with :individuals as well as studying various= asects of future resources.'
I personally feel that I would be capable of working with both boards
Provided that the Tigard ;water District; gave me similar authorityas I
now enjoy with ;the City Council.
I think it is imperative on the part of the Council that some decision
be made in the not too distant future concerning ;the water function.
The industries in the Bonita industrial area have`been assured that
water will; be supplied to them. They have indicated their willingness
I ' to cooperate with the City of Tigard by financing this ;project. If we
are to maintain and promote an expansion in our economic base, the water
function must be added to our planning process. Industries wanttolocate in the Tigard area but the lack of utilities in many of our
industrial; areas, such as Cipole, will serve 'to hamper our growth and
proper development.
i
;J'
z
,
To: Mayor F: Council
Page 5 August 17, 196
3,
j
i. In :conclusion I woulctt sav, . 'that ci'i .2ei' of the alternatives proj"+nSP_,j
abate has its c?rav;back Pr ;f'e.ralily, alternative nunuber,t<,o, providing
the City Council .,rs given certain assurances, would be the most
advantageous to our community c?eve] opnent.
P(-Is,.,e .tfully submitted,
E
I i2' i car_t I:. r,o
,\,
gan J
C t-v Administrator
xl;dh
7
,7
:9
y]
j ,