Resolution No. 04-59 CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON
RESOLUTION NO.04-
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION PLAN AS
APPLICABLE GUIDELINES TO ANNEXATION OF UNINCORPORATED AREAS
WITHIN BULL MOUNTAIN TO THE CITY OF TIGAR.D
WHEREAS,City staff has drafted a Bull Mountain Annexation Plan authorizing a possible
approach to annexation of the Bull Mountain area to the City of Tigard;and
WHEREAS,the annexation called for in the Bull Mountain Annexation Plan would add 1,376
acres,including approximately 7,600 residents living in 2,600 homes,from an area of
unincorporated Washington County known as Bull Mountain to the Tigard city limits;and
WHEREAS,Bull Mountain is located within the Metro Urban Growth Boundary;and
WHEREAS,urban services to the Bull Mountain area will be provided according to the Tigard
Urban Services Agreement;and
WI-IEREAS,the Annexation Plan states that the City of Tigard can serve the Bull Mountain area
without a significant reduction in city service to Tigard residents;and
WI-IEREAS,on December 16,2003,the Council adopted a resolution that directed staff to
schedule a public hearing and to form subcommittees of Washington County representatives,and
Bull Mountain and Tigard residents;and
WHEREAS,in accordance with the December 16,2003,resolution,the City Council held a
public hearing on the Bull Mountain Annexation Plan on July 27,2004;and
WHEREAS,the City Council received additional written comment until August 3,2004;and
WHEREAS,the City Council has reviewed the testimony,submittals,and staff report on this
matter;and
WHEREAS,the City Council concludes that the Annexation Plan provides the best approach to
annexation of the area and that annexation of the area is needed to comply with Goal 14;
i NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
i
SECTION 1: The Bull Mountain Annexation Plan,a copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference,is accepted by the City of Tigard and shall be used
by the City in providing guidelines for annexation of the Bull Mountain area.
C:\DOCUME-1\j=.\LOCAIS-1\Temp\BMRESO-1.DOC
Resolution No. 04-5`I
Page 1
SECTION 2: This resolution is final andeffectiveupon passage.
PASSED: This 16 th day of /7 2! za-G � 2004.
Mayor- it of Tigard
ATTEST:
and
Jane McGarvin,Deputy City Recorder
i
i
j
i
i
C;\DocumE-1\janeUACAIS-1\Temp1BMRES0.1.DOC
Resolution No. 04-59
Page 2
EXHIBIT"A"
THE BULL MOUN'T'AIN
ANNEXATION PLAN
r �
. arrw�w.ao -
A STEP TOWARD COMPLETING
OUR COMMUNITY
s
CITY OF TIGARD
JbE Y 12,2004
i
i
i
THE BULL M O U N T A I N
ANNEXATION PLAN
JULY 2004 -
PRODUCED BY:
THE CITY OF TIGARD
IN COLLABORATION WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY
CITY OF TIGARD
131255W HALL BLVD.
j TiGARD,OR 97223
I 503/639-4171
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ExEcurlvE SUMMARY
I.INTRODUCTION 1
II.ANNEXATION PLAN CRITERIA 5
A LOCAL STANDARDS OF URBAN SERVICE AVAILABILITY 7
B. SCHEDULE FOR PROVIDING URKANSERVICES 10
C. TIMING AND SEQUENCE OF ANNEXATION 13
D.EFFECISONEXISTINGURBAN SERVICESPROVIDERS 16
E. LONG-TERM BENEFITS OF TBE PLAN 19
III.ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 21
IV CONCLUSION 23
APPENDIX A.GLOSSARY
APPENDIX B:FISCAL ANALYSIS UPDATE
APPENDIX C:TAX RATE TABLE
APPENDIX D:TIGARD URBAN SERVICE AGREEMENT,NOV.26,2002
APPENDIX E:EVALUATION CRITERIA FROM 2003 ASSESSMENT REPORT
APPENDIX F: LIST OF PLAN AREA ROADS BY TRANSFER STATUS
FOLLOWING ANNEXATION
APPENDIX G:CHANGE IN SERVICE LEVELS BETWEEN COUNTY AND CITY
FOR SERVICES WHERE PROVIDER AND SERVICE CHANGES
UPON ANNEXATION
TECHNICAL DOCUMENT B(AVAILABLE SEPARATELY
Draft Faalitia aryl PuHzcS&-ucs Assasmw Rq,"t far the Bull Ma =mAra%,2003.
7lx Bull AfwrainArm=aticn S&*2001.
EXEcunw Summ
ANNEXATION PROPOSAL
The Bull Mountain Annexation Plan is a Guy of Tigard proposal to annex 1,376 acres of
Washington county known as Bull Mountain through the annexation plan process.With
voter approval,the entire Plan Area will be annexed effective July 1,2005.
The plan area is generallybounded on the north byBanows Road,on the east by Tigard
City limits,on the south by Beef Bend Road,and on the west partially by 150th Avenue and
near Roy Rogers Road.Map 1 on p.4 of The Bull Mountain Annexation Plan denotes the
specific boundaries.The proposal does not include the UGB sites_63 and 64,but their
adjacency to the Plan Area was factored into the analysis.
Upon annexation,the City of Tigard will be the service provider to the annexed territory for
the following services:building and development services,water,street light maintenance,
road quality maintenance,parks and open space,street maintenance,police,long-range
planning,sanitary and storm sewer.
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue will continue as the fire protection and emergencyservice
provider,TriMet will continue as the mass transit provider,and school district boundaries
will remain the same.
ANNEXATION PLAN FOUNDATIONS
Twentyyears ago,Washington Countyand the Crtyof Tigard laid the groundwork for bringing
Brill Mountain into Trgard's citylimits(annexation).Although cattle and farms shared the
mountain at that tone,the Counryand City recognized that the area's inclusion within the Urban
Growth Boundarywould eventuallylead to urban development.State land-use planning goals
require the UGB to contain a 20-year supply of land,and,when conditions warrant,lands within
the boundarymust be available for urban uses.Washington County and Bull Mountain residents
developed the 1983 Bull Mountain CommunityPlan,which assigned urban densities to the area
but did not provide for all urban services.
Statewide plana na Coal 14 directs local governments to have a plan in place to allow for an
oniedyand efficient transition from rural to urban uses.In 1983,the Countyand Cirysigned the
Urban Planrruig Area Agreemeru(UPAA).The UPAA established Bull Mountain as part of the
City's planning area and paved the wayfor the Counryand Ciryto joindyserve the area At the
j same tune,the Cites 4ong-term vision for land-use and development in Tigard(rhe
comprehensive Pian)encouraged the annexation of all uuriincorporated areas.The City
j acknowledged that it shorild.provide urban services to its own citizens-once areas require urban
i services,residents should receive afl the benefits of citizenship,including representation.
i
I�
Today,Buff Mountain has grown bey
ond its renal roots,and become an urbanized area with
streets,sidewalks,and urban service needs.Farms have been largely replaced by subdivisions
built at the same densities as adjacent Tigard neighborhoods.Urban areas need urban service
providers-and cities,not counties,are best equipped to provide urban_services.Over time,
the needs of an urban area will outpace a non-urban provider's service capabilities.
The Tigard City Council established a goal in 2001 to develop an annexation policy/strategyfor
unincorporated areas.From 2001-2004,the City has thoroughly examined annexation and urban
service issues for Bull Mountain.WXBid MaooraainAnmatianPlan builds upon these efforts and
propeses an annexation strategy.It addresses the how,when,where and who of annexation.
State law created the annexation plan process as a growth management tool for jurisdictions:the
plan must address criteria related to urban service provision to the Plan Area,and is a pre-
requisite for an annexation vote by the annexing cityand Plan Area.
FLAN SIGNIFICANCE
There are approximately7,600 residents living in 2,600 homes on the mountain's
approximately 1,376 unincorporated acres.Estimated development of the remaining land
would raise the overall population to approximately 10,000.This additional growth will
require additional facilities and services.Without annexation,the City has limited ability to
plan for,provide for,and manage growth outside its Citylimits to ensure that efficient and
effective public facilities and services are available when needed.The current operative plan,
7be Bull Maavain Camsarity Plans was adopted by Washington County more than 20 years
ago.The County has stated that it does not plan to undertake a comprehensive update of its
comprehensive plan,including The BO Maavain Gb+m rury Plan.The County will continue to
snake periodic changes.With annexation,the Cary of Tigard would be able to plan for,and
manage,growth on Bull Mountain with an updated comprehensive plan for the entire
community.
Using existing service agreements among agencies,cost-benefit analyses,and the 2003 Public
Faalaiks and SezicEs Assas"ogt Report fw-the Bull MaairainA rax recommendations,the plan
addresses all criteria set forth by state law ORS 195: the provision(how and when)of urban
services,annexation's impact on existing providers,the timing and sequence of annexation,
and the plan's long-term benefits.The plan also addresses Tigard Comprehensive Plan
policies,which require a review to determine that services can be provided to the annexed
area and their provision will not significantly reduce service levels to the City of Tigard.
It must be noted that individual annexations Will occur in the Plan Area with or without an
annexation plan.Currently,annexations occur at the owner's request,resulting in a
piecemeal approach to incorporation.In contrast,YZeBull Ma -u A wxxaticnplan provides
a comprehensive approach for annexation.Long-term planning offers long-term benefits,
including certainty of future incorporation,enhanced efficiency,and quantified costs and benefits
-which provide certainty toTigard residents that annexation will not impact their service levels_
Financially,it captures more capital improvement dollars for parks and roads,and more funds to
enhance capital facilities-such as the libraryand parts-currently used by both Bull Mountain
and Tigard residents but paid for byTigard residents.
Bull lvtountain residents would receive park services,local representation,and urban services by
an urban provider who can meet the needs of a growing community.Lastly,annexation would
unify the community,as both the city and Bull Mountain residents can plan together for their
future, a future joined together 20 years ago.The BdlMaorramAmrxadm Plan presents a clear
and efficient approach to annex unincorporated Bull Mountain and a step toward
completing our community.
I.INTRODUCTION
Twentyyears ago,Washington County and the City of Tigard laid the groundwork for Bull
Mountain's annexation to Tigard.Although cattle and fauns shared the mountain at that time,
the County and City recognized that the area's inclusion within the Urban Growth Boundary
would eventually lead to urban development.State land-use planning goals require the UGB to
contain a 20-year supply of Lard,and when conditions warrant,lands within the boundary must
be available for urban uses.Washington County and Bull Mountain residents developed the 1983
Bull Mountain CommruutyPlan,which assigned urban densities to the area but not urban
services.
State planning Goal 14 directs local governments to have a plan in place to allow for an orderly
and efficient transition from nual to urban uses.In 1983,the Countyand Citysigned the Urban
Planning Area Agreement(UPAA),which established Bull Mountain as part of the CiWs
planning area and paved the wayfor the Countyand Gryto jointlyserve the area.At the same
tune,the CkYs long-term vision for land-use and development in Tigard(the Comprehensive
Plan)encouraged the annexation of all unincorporated areas.'Me City acknowledged that it
should provide urban services to its own citizens-once areas require urban services,residents
should receive all the benefits of citizenship,including representation
Today,Bull Mountain has grown beyond its Waal roots,and become an urbanized area with
streets,sidewalks,and urban service needs.Over time and additional agreements,Tigard has
absorbed more services toward an eventual annexation,blurring the line between County and
City.However,major services remain under the County's purview,as does jurisdiction.Without
annexation,the City has limited ability to manage growth outside its city limits to ensure that
efficient and effective public facilities and services are provided.
Since 2001,when the Tigard City Council established a goal to develop an annexation
policy/strategy for unincorporated areas,the City has thoroughlyexamined urban service issues for
Bull Mountain,Thr:BdlMaor inrAracrariwSurly(2001),which examined the costs and benefits of
annexation;a public opinion surveyof Tigard and Bull Mountain residents on annexation(2002);
71.e PtMcFaa&tuY cod So-cm Assesnm Resortfir dx B dl MavxamAn u(2003),which evaluated the
factors affecting long-term service provision to Brill Mountain,including annexation
The 2003 Assessment Report demonstrated that annexation would serve citizens the most
efficindyand effectively over the long term,providing urban levels of services to an area that
has grown from a rural community to an urban neighborhood.In addition,annexation would
allow the City and Bull Mountain residents to plan for Bull Mountain's future.The current
i operative plan,77z Bull Mavmt do Canrsrzrrv'ty Plan;was adopted by Washington County more
than 20 years ago.The County has stated that it does not plan to undertake a comprehensive
update of its comprehensive plan,including 71x Bull Matvmain Convnouty Plant The County
will continue to make periodic changes.Also,unincorporated areas cannot collect parks system
development charges(SDCs)from new developments or plan for parks,and the County has
jurisdiction over the area's long-range planning.Annexation would allow the Ciity and residents
to plan for growth on Bull Mountain with an updated comprehensive plan for the entire
community.As citizens of Tigard,Bull Mountain residents would have a say on local issues that
affect their corurnu ayes future.
T 7 tm BULL MouNTArNANNEXAmoN PLAN—PAGE 1
7hie Brill MaatainAmrocariar Plan represents a significant step toward the realization of an
united Tigard and Bull Mountain community.The plan lays out a blueprint for annexation as
required bystate law ORS195.205 and ORS195.220,which established the annexation plan
process.It addresses the how,when,where and who of annexation,but in essence,the plan
is a proposal for extending urban services and transferring households to Tigard in an
organized and efficient manner.It is based upon existing service agreements among agencies
and cost-benefit analyses,and addresses the following,per state law ORS 195220:
a) Local standards of urban service availability required as a precondition of
annexarior4
b) The planned schedule for providing urban services to the annexed territory,
c) The timing and sequence of annexation;
d) The effects onexisting urban services providers;
e) Ile long-term benefns of the annexation plan.
The plan examines each criterion separately.Each section offers a brief explanation of the
criterion and follows with text based on the City's previous research and recent analysis
produced by the Cityand County for this plan.Appendix A contains a glossary of planning
terms used in this docuarnt.Technical Document B(available separateW contains copies of
previous Bull Mountain reports,including 71ePubhcFaolitia aril Smias Assasno r Repat fardx
Brdl MaotairtAma,2003.
A)THE ANNEXATION PLAN AREA:BOUNDARIES
The Annexation Plan applies to the unincorporated area of Bull Mountain("Plan Area").It
is bounded on the north by Barrows Road,on the east byTrgard citylimits,to the south by
Beef Bend Road,and on the west bythe new Urban Growth Expansion(UGB)Areas(Roy
Rogers Road and 150'Ave.--See Map 1 on page 4).The Plan does not include the new
UGB areas because theyare not part of the existing County-City agreements for Bull
Mountain,and the Tigard City Council indicated that the Plan Area should be addressed
first.However,their adjacency to the Plan Area was factored into the analysis(see page 13).
The land in the Plan Area is sloped—steeply in some areas—allowing for views at
higher elevations.There is no commercial or industrial zoned land.Most of the
property is zoned R-7,as designated in the Washington County Bull Mow rain
CwmraontyPlan,a medium-density residential zone with minimum lot sizes of 5,000
square feet.The area consists of a combination of 1) a mix of larger undeveloped lots,
• 2)larger lots developed through the County under different standards,and 3)smaller
i lots that are built to the minimum density allowed under the current zoning
i regulations.
j
M-w Butt houumw ANNExAmor4 PLAN—PAGE
Subareas and Population Estimates
The Plan Area comprises 1,376 acres,'with approximately Table 1.Z003 Estimates
7,600 residents living in 2,600 homes.Numbers are 2003 Homes Po ulation
estimates based on Census 2000 figures and average growth North 991 2930
rates.Thisisconsistent with 7bePtd&F46UtiearilSalmWest 346 982
Asses»stRepatfa'theB:dlMamr,,inAnn methods,with the
exception of deducting four annexations that took place from South 1174 3259
late 2001 to 2003.Z East 167 452
Total 2678 7623
Due to the area's size,it has been divided into four subareas: oQ
North,West,South and East.These subareas were developed
based on development patterns,topography,and man-made boundaries,such as major
roads.The South area has the most homes and population,with North close behind.East
has the least number of homes and people(Table 1).
Future Projections
Future projections were estimated by calculating the maximum number of new homes the
area could potentially absorb at current zoning(R-7,or 5,000 sq.ft.lots),and taking half of
this projection to allow for moderate development'Based on these estimates,East has the
largest share of future growth,due to large,undeveloped lots(Table 2).The remaining
subareas have more developed subdivisions and Table 2.Moderate Growth
few vacant lots,and have limited growth Estimated ad )
remaining. Additional Total Total
Homes Homes PO la'n Po elation
7bepUW Faahtis ani SeruuN Assesnx7l Repa,t North +139 1130 +401 3331
(2003)used these numbers to approximate West +150 496 +457 1439
service needs,costs,and associated revenues. South +143 1317 +465 3724
The condition and number of roads,current East +483 650 +904 1356
condition of facilities,current and future Total +915 3593 +2227 9850
population/homes,and year of developments
affected each subarea's needs.The Annexation
Plan analysis is based upon the 2003 report
conclusions and additional refinements to the report data.
i
i
i '
i
i
I Differs from the 2001 study due to five annexations:Pacific Crest,Fern Street,Thomwood,Daffodil ffA
and Bohan-Cooper.
t T1ie"numbers here(7,622 and 2,678)reflect 2003 projected population and deduct for fannexations,
d iffering ftom The Silt Ma vm=Str,t,and Pubic Fdaluyatd Se vmc Assessi at Rq"r numbers.
rBued on vacant or underdeveloped lots.A moderate scenario was assumed due to the nurcerraintyof the land
menu not every owner vA fullydevelop each vacant or underdeveloped parcel
marl�c 0d esi ort develop t for a _ e did not nificantl affect this analysis.
•11u 2003 Report did not deduct for annexations;the Chang ig Y
'11-M BULL fv10UNrALN ANMXAnON PLAN—PAGE 3
AM
L 1
Ll
�.
N ��� I y
r - f>t
y mine
;ra..�\..
LA
MI�� ♦ eve �i\i� �--- � '..111':C`�j-{— t=®vN
�•�+� `1�-Haa `IcitL. Il�illl��r°�y may`
IRE
I ),1�♦ Ta .I
, � >. � Tom_�„�♦� yy n1.� • I f
aR
J
II.ANNEXATION PLAN CRITERIA
In 1993 the Stare Legislature established the annexation plan method to male annexation an
effective growth management tool for jurisdictions.Annexation plans require fiscal and territorial
coordination between service providers,encourage the creation of long-term master plans,address
the economic viab&yof special districts,and danfYthe costs and benefits of annexation.,
Specifically,state law ORS 195.220 requires annexation plans to include the following:
a) Local standards of urban service availability required as a precondition of
annexation;
b) The planned schedule for providing urban services to the annexed territory;
c) The timing and sequence of annexation;
d) The effects on existing urban services providers;
e) The long-term benefits of the annexation plan.
What is an Urban Service?
The plan uses the collective term"urban services"to refer to all services described below
and listed in Table 4 on p.9.The scope of analysis includes those urban services defined by
state law,local annexation criteria,and city/countyagreements.
State Law Definition
State law ORS195 defines"urban services"as sartitarysewers,water,fire protection,paths,
open space,recreation,streets,roads and mass transit.
City of Tigard Anniexation Criteria
The City's ComrnvnityDevelopment Code criteria for annexations are consistent with
ORS195220.The Code(Title 18)states that the decision to annex propertyto the Ciryshall
be based on 1)all services and facilities being available to the area,and with sufficient
capacity to provide service;and 2)satisfying all Comprehensive Plan policies.
Based on the C4Ys Comprehensive Plan requirements,VeBrdl MaOYlrnxArneratiwPlmrconsiders
police,and sandanyand storm sewer services as urban services and addresses their provision.
Tigard's Comprehensive Phan Policy 10(Urbanization)requires the following.
a) The City shall review each of the following services as to adequate capacity,or
such services to be made available,to serve the parcel if developed to the most
intense use allowed-�(most intense use allowed by the conditions of approval,the
zone or the Comprehensive Plan),and will not significantly reduce the level of
i services available to developed and undeveloped land within the City of Tigard.
! The services are:1.Water,2.Sewer,3.Drainage,4.Streets,5.Police,and 6.Fire
Protection.
b) The Cityshall provide urban services to areas within the Tigard Urban Planning
Area or within the Urban Growth Boundary upon annexation.
c) Approval of proposed annexations of land by the Oty shall be based on findings
with respect to the following:
s Frain DePattrKirc of Ind Consecvuion u,d Devebpmenr;h •a a"'� r.r1r�r�/o• / �"Pshtm
IMBUtLMfWNPAtNAN EXA'noNPLAN—PAGE
L The annexation eliminates an existing`pocket"or"island"of
unincorporated territory.
ii- The annexation will not create an irregular boundary that makes it
difficult for the police in an emergency situation to determine whether
the parcel is within or outside the City
iii. The Police Department has commented upon the annexation.
iv. The land is located within the Tigard Urban Planning Area and is
contiguous to the cityboundary
v. The annexation can be accommodated by the services listed above.
Additional Urban Services(City/County Agreements)
The Plan also addresses building and development services,long-range planning,and street light
maintenance,which are addressed in existing City/CountyAgreements(II SA,USIGA,UPAA).
See Appendix A for agreement definitions.
1
i
i
i
11-m BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXAMON PrAN-PAGE 6
A.LOCAL.STANDARDS OF URBAN SERVICE AVAILABILITY
An annexation plan adopted under ORS 195.205 shall include
Local standards of urban services required prior to annexation and the availability
of each service.
Level of Urban Services
The annexation plan process emphasizes coordination between service agencies to identify
and address any service deficiencies early in the process,assuring that services can be
provided to local standards after annexation.Prior to the plan,state law requires urban
service agreements between all service providers in the affected territory.By taking this step
first,agencies resolve future service provision issues and lay groundwork for the plan.
In February2003,Washington County,the City of Tigard,other agencies and service districts
finalized the Tigard Urban Service Agreement(1C1SA)for the Brill Mountain area(Appendix D).
In stun,all urban services are available for the Plan Area except recreation.' The agreement
determines;long-term service providers and assigns Tigard as the ultimate service provider for
the Plan Area,except for services provided by special districts and agencies.Table 3 summarizes
changes in local service standards between current and future providers.
Urban Service Requirements Prior to Annexation
Table 4 on p.8 provides an overview of how annexation affects services.It lists current
services,providers before and after annexation,and identifies local service standards.Table 4
demonstrates that atyof Tigard standards are higher for parks and open space,street
maintenance,police,and long-range
planning- UW 3-Summa 0Anneeation I.Pad an Service
" Service Change
Lang range Planning •
Of those services,parks will require action by the r.k. •
County prior to annexation(see below).Road Street Maintenance •
Pates and OPea SPace •
quality maintenance also will require action per the road Ouahly Maintenance o
Tigard Urban Service Agreement(IDSA). County Storm Serer e
action will allow the City to provide its standard of Street tight Maintenance .a
service following annexation.All other services will SanuarySewer sv
require only staffing and equipment to meet local water o
service standards as summarized in Table 4 on page 9. R h��;ran o
The specifics are addressed in section FIB beginning i uddmg d Oeeelopmeal$ervias o
on page 10. MasS transit o
Elle Prote[tiaa S rmergenry Semites O
Road QuaFuy Maintenance o_M.
• G)u,vy-inTroves roads so that all individual
roads nave a pavement condition index(PCZ)of 40 or greater and
the average PCZ of streets and roads in the area is 75 or higher.
'Neither Washington County nor Tigard provide this service at thish s.However,Tigard has a Paris and
Recreation AdvisoryBoard that can esamure the issue in the future.
T MBULL Motii�rre¢.tArmMXAnortPtArt—PAGE
Parks and Open Space
Countycollects parks system development charges(SDCs)for new development prior
to annexation.Upon annexation,those funds wilt transfer to Tigard and be used towrard
new fact1ities.
Summary.Criteria f(Local Standards of Urban Service Availability)
0 All services except recreation are available to the Plan Area
0 Providers for each urban smite are established,per urban service agreements.
0 Local standards of urban smite are identified
0 Where applicable identifies steps needed by the County to meet local standards prior to annexation.
C
D
3
0
u
I*FMBE)UMOUNrMNANNEXA joNPLAN— PAGE 8
Table 4.BuU Mountain:Service Standard(Ylanges Following Annexation
Setv'rce/Uirtegc�'mvtder. I'fovlfi n,� - � r
art:-.4rJ,,1,iMk:Ti> -
Fire Protection Sc Emergency Tualatin Valley Fite&Rescue No.
Services(Tualatin Valley Fire Sc
Rescue
Mus Transitriblet TdMet No.
Building and Development Cityof Tigard No. Tigard now provides these services
Services(Cityof Tigard) for Plan Area through an agreement with
Washington County_The agreement will
cease but Tigard continues same services.
Recreation(No provider) No provider.Tigard does not provide No.Not currently provided_However,
recreation services, Tigard has a Park and Recreation Advisory
Board that can examine the issue in the
future.
Schools Annexation does not chaLige school district boundaries.
Water (City of Tigard through a City of Tigard. No.
contract with T and WaterDisi[j
Scr%icc Remains the Same,
ges
Sanitary Sewer(Clean Water ity of Tigard.11re Gtywill provide No.
Services;Gtyof Tigard Jan 1,2005) maintenance as of Jan.1,2005,per an
agreement with Clean Water Services.
It is not affected bV annexation.
Sheet Light Maintenance Cityof Tigard No.
as n County)
Storm Sewer(Clean Water City of Tigard.The City will provide No.
Services;Crtyof Tigard Jan.1,2005) mainrenance as of Jan.1,2005,per an
agreement with Clean Water Services_
It is not affected by annexation-
Road Quality Maintenance, Cityof Tigard_ No.However,the Tigard Urban Service
(Washington Count)) Agreement('1'USA)requires the Countyto
(*Actions to nuintam pavement improve individual roads to pavement
qualit)) condition index (PCZ)of at least 40,with
all roads averaging at least 75,prior to
transfe roads and service.
Service Changes, ProNide Chang s
Packs and Open Space(No Cityof Tigard. yes;ilacres/1,000 people.
provider) Washington County does
not provide these services to
unincorporated areas.
Sheet Maintenance- City of Tigard. Yes.Mowing roadside grass and bitch
l (Washington Countydirough the (strip and ditch line)_Dust abatement on
Urban Road Maintenance District) graveled roads.Vegetation removal for
vision clearance_Crack sealing and road
shoulders on 4-year le.
Police(Washington County City of Tigard Yes.Additional_5officers/1000 people
Enhanced Sheriff Patrol District) (citystandard is 1.5 officers11000).
Response times for Priority 1 and 2 calls
under four minutes.
Community Development- City of Tigard.This includes Yes.Staff serves smaller area than County;
Long Range Planning comprehensive planning,such as focuses on local projects. Annexation will
(Washington Coung). master plans_The 1983 Bull Mountain allow the City to plan for growth on Bull
Community Plan is the operative plan Mountain with an updated comprehensive
Washington County has in place for plan for the entire community.
the Plan Area.
IYIE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXAMoN PLAN—PAGE 9
B.SCHEDULE FOR PROVIDING URBAN SERVICES
An annexation plan adopted under ORS 195.2015 shall include
The planned schedule for providing urban services to the annexed territory.
As shown in section IIA,the Plan Area receives most urban services today,four of which
will be provided at higher standards after annexation.All services would be available upon
annexation,due to the continuation of existing services per the Tigard Urban Service
Agreement(TL)SA)-
To ensure smooth transitions,this section identifies when providers would transfer services.
The following analysis reviews staff and equipment needs and evaluates where gradual
provider transitions will best serve the Plan Area,are dictated by the TUSA,or are required
to maintain existing service levels to current CAtyof Tigard residents.7heBO Maorain
AnnrxatibnPlan defines the annexation effective date("upon annexation")as the day
properties become part of Trgarl's tax rolls.For analysis purposes,this section assumes a
date of July 1,the fust day of the new fiscal year following an approval by voters.
Equipment and Staff Needs
For WeAd&Faaltaey and SovLff Assasnz),r Reim;Cityof Tigard staff from all affected
-departments projected start-up costs,needs,and ability to serve the entire Bull Mountain area or
individual areas upon annexation.Each department based its analysis on current population and
housing unit estimates,future service needs at build-out,and service standards.
All departments-except for Public Works(Streets Division)-concluded that theycould
absorb anyor all subareas using current resources,and without significantly reducing
services to existing residents.
The Public Works and Police departments concluded the following:
• Public Worsts.Annexation of the Plan Area would increase the road mile inventoryby
23%.The Streets Division could not absorb the entire Plan Area's roads and streets
upon annexation without hiring two employees and purchasing duee trucks immediately.
• Police.
o Response Times.Police could absorb all or any subareas with existing
resources and maintain its standard of responding to Priority 1 and 2 calls
r (crimes in progress)in under four minutes.There would be a temporary
reduction in response time to PriorityThree calls(lowest priority,no one in
i danger,ie.,car prowl)within a few minutes.Internal adjustments would
! occur to fu!l;rstaff patrols until additional officers could be hired and fully
trained.
o Staff.The entire Plan Area requires 11 police officers,1 supervisor,and 1
support staff.New officer hiring procedures established in 2003 now reduce
the training time needed to six months,as recruiting time has been
significandyshortened by maintaining an applicant pool.
MiEBUILMOUNTmNANmxAmoNPLAN—PAGE 10
A detailed plan and schedule for hiring staff and purchasing or transferring equipment from
Washington Countywill be developed,as required by the TUSA.
Agreement Provisions
The T'USA includes separate agreements for each service.For those services transferring to
Tigard,the agreements state"upon annexation."There are two exceptions:roads and
sanitary/storm sewer.
The TUBA states that within 30 days of annexation,the City initiate jurisdiction transfer
of roads,completing the transfer within one year from the annexation effective date.This
applies to all roads and streets with a county road number(Appendix F).Those roads and
streets without a county road number automatically transfer upon annexation.'Me sewer
agreement defers to a separate operating agreement between the City and Clean Water
Services.The operating agreement transfers sanitary and storm sewer maintenance to the
Guyon Jan.1,2005.The agreement covers an area including Tigard,Bull Mountain,King
City,Durham,and Metzger,and includes provisions for equipment and funding.Annexation
does not affect the transfer or provision of sanitary and storm sewer services.
Proposed Schedule for Tigard Assuming Urban Services
A thorough consideration of MA requirements,Bull Mountain's service needs,and the
effects on existing services to Tigan)residents suggests the following schedule:
Table 4.Proposed Schedule for Tigard to Provide Urban Services
Building and Development Services(already provided)
Parks and Open Space—Bull Mountain receives resident privileges for City parks
Police
Sanitary and Storm Sewer(provided by Tigard effective January 1,2005)
Street Light Maintenance
Streets and Roads(without a County Road Number)(see Appendix Fl
Water
'Within V'year
• Parks and Open Space—Initiate Capital Project planning for Cache
Creek Nature Park.Explore additional park opportunities adjacent to
Cache,including Tigard Water District reservoir property and(lute
property.Develop playground either an Cache Creek or adjacent
property.Maintenance begins once lands are bought and developed.
• Road Quality Maintenance and Street Maintenance:Roads
without county numbers automatically transfer with annexation.
1 Within 30 days of annexation,the City will initiate the process to
e ! transfer jurisdiction of roads with county numbers.This transfer
should take no more than one year from annexation effective date.
• Long-Range Planning—Annexation will aW.-th.City to plan for
growth on Bull Mountain with an updated comprehensive plan for the
entire community.
IVIS BULL MOUNCAINANmXAX[0N PLAN—PAGE 11
Summary:Criteria 2(Schedule for Providing Urban Services)
H City of Tigard can serve the Bull Mountain arca without a significant reduction in service to Tigard residents.
H City ofTigard will assume all services upon annexation,mcpt Road Quality and Street Maintenance forcounty number roads.
H CityofTigard will initiate transferof county-number roads and streets within 30days ofannccation,savingwithin l year.
H Followingannezation and within the first year,Tigard will initiate capital project planning for Parks and Open Space and long-
rangepk—ing.
H Police can serve the entire arca without significantly reducing response times.Priority 1 and 2 calls would be maintained at under
4 minutes;only a reduction in Priority 3 calls(lowest priority;no one in danger)will occur until additional staff is hired and trained
11-iE BML hfot mmwAMqEXAnoNPLAN PAGE 12
C.TIMING AND SEQUENCE OF ANNEXATION
An annexation plan adopted under ORS 195.205 shall include
Timing and Sequence of Annexation_
Annexation plans offer the option of phased,or incremental,annexations.In some
instances,it may be more efficient to annex an entire area at one time.In other cases,a
phased annexation allows the necessary time for service providers to hire enough staff and
buyequipment.
The PubhcFaolities and Semis Assessmnt Reprnt examined nine sequencing options to identify
the combinations which allowed the City to annex and efficiently serve the unincorporated
Bull Mountain area:subareas alone,in contiguous pairs(i.e.,West and Noith);and All Areas
at once.It also studied how timing(ie.,the year of annexation)affected service costs and the
availability of capital improvement funds in the Plan Area.
Sequencing
Faaas
Four evaluation factors were chosen based on Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies,which
require annexations 1)to not significantly reduce service levels to the City of Tigard and 2)
the affected property to receive efficient service provision at capacity(no service islands or
irregular boundaries).Each factor was weighted,based on the extent to which it implements
those policies:
1)Fivr�Inpam Will this area be a financial drain on the city?Do service needs
outpace tax dollars,and are there large capital improvements needed in the short
term?(45 points)
2)EJfdaxy efsera(e pmrisim Is it easy to access this area,or will staff have to cross
unincorporated areas to do so?Does it create islands of unincorporated areas?Is
there an economy of scale?(30 points)
3)Adjacency to the new Urh=C»auth Bowz[ary prapertis,located to the south and west
of the Plan A. Metro approved these areas in December 2002.A future city link
to these areas would enable long-term planning.(20 points)
4)Addz cnd(,onsidemekm.An additional category was also included to capture
additional considerations,such as publicly owned land with park potential,that didn't
fit into the three main categories(5 points).
Ranking
The evaluation matrix ranked the nine options (tbe full evaluation matrix is located in
Appendix E),concluding the following.-
'Me
ollowing:The more areas annexed,the higher the raAdng due to an increase in efficiency.
Annexing All Areas at once ranked must highly,due to economyof scale and its
ability to support areas that ranked less iS Ca`uv.
• The contiguous pairs were ranked the next highest,followed by all individual
subareas,with the exception of West.In every combination except Ail Areas,West
ranked lowsince it does not connect to Cityboundaries.
1YiEBuLLAlbuLgrmNA INEXAMONPrAN—PAGE 13
CcrsiderAvaLhk Raanus;
The plan must also consider comments by individual service providers regarding their ability
to serve the area upon annexation,per the Comprehensive Plan.As detailed in section IIB,
all service providers except for Public Works(Streets Division)and Police could absorb any
or all subareas with current resources.
• Public Works(Streets Division)requires additional resources to serve the entire
area upon annexation.Six months prior to assuming services,the department would
require two additional staff and three trucks.Annexing without these resources
would reduce services,including street light clearance pruning,crack sealing,and
Postponement of speed humps,unless the county-number roads transfer was
delayed,as the 71JSA allows.
• Police can serve Bull Mountain and the City of Tigard with current staff, resulting
only in a temporary reduction in Priority Three(lowest priority)call response times.
The Priority 1 and 2 response time would be maintained at under 4 minutes.The
response time to Priority Three calls would vary within minutes,and citizens would
not see a difference.Internal adjustments would occur to fullystaff patrols until
additional officers could be hired and fullyttained.The department will need to hire
11 additional officers,1 supervisor,and 1 support staff.
The PuElicFadlaus aril SovwAssessmem Report concluded that delaying the effective date of
annexation by up to a year would allow hiring and training of police staff and purchase of
new equipment.However,since the report was completed,Police stated that an All Areas
annexation would provide an advantageous economy of scale,as a larger department can
provide more services and reduced response times.In addition,the recruiting and training
process has been reduced to six months.
Caw�xvrTomw,&undyw&Icrar9rsavo,dtleragwrestaffmzlaFapn priorroavexaumor
forstrtrts,da'ayrrarafercfaxeuJ,rnmfxr_,&s.
Tinning
The assessment report examined how timing(Le.,the year of annexation)affects the
availability of capital improvement funds and general revenues in the Plan Area.
Capital Irribro—vrd Ptosis
Funding for capital improvements,such as major road improvements,parks,and sanitary
and storm sewer,are partially funded bysystem development charges(SDCs)paid by new
development_SDCs act as growth management tools by helping pay for system
improvements,such as roads and parks,needed as population and households increase.
j In the Plan Area,SDCs are collected for storm and sanitarysewer,roads(the traffic impact
fee or TIFF'),and water.However,Washington County does not collect parks SDCs in the
Plan Area or provide parks services.Because SDCs are one-time charges applied to new
developments,each new home built.without SDCs represents lost revenue.
The City of Tigard collects parks SDCs within its city limits,which are used for developing
new parks.Once the County adopts a parts SDC for the Plan Area,and following
annexation,SDCs would be collected and directed into City projects.The County will adopt
TEM$tar MOUNtAM ANMXA'noN PLAN—PAGE 14
a parks SDCafter the Tigard City Council adopts the annexation plan and acts to place it on
the Noveinber 2004 ballot.Without a parks SDC,delaying annexation impacts the City's
ability to address Bull Mountain's parks capital needs.Each incremental delay lessens
contributions—or elirninates them entirely in some subareas(new developments have been
built).Based on recent development trends,the assessment report recommended that
annexation of All Areas should occur by 2005 to maximize potential financial contributions.
Qvidusicrr Aronc AU A rats by 2005 or haze Wasbirtgmn Gxaay itviaae Parks SDCs in the rrtaerim
miaflatonmwwfi anxxatim
Timittg_and Sequencing
With voter approval,the entire Plan Area will be annexed effective July 1,2005.In the
assessment report,this option ranked the most highlydue to economies of scale.Except for
maintenance of County-numbered roads,Tigard will assume responsibility for urban services
other than fire protection and mass transit.If voters approve the plan,the City will hire
additional personnel and obtain additional equipment needed to maintain service standards
for Public Works(Streets).Tigard will assurne responsibility for County numbered roads by
agreement with the County,with the transfer of jurisdiction over those roads to occur within
one year of annexation.Police can serve the area without a significant reduction in service,
due to internal adjustments until additional police officers can be hired.The City will initiate
the 6-month hiring/training process prior to annexation.The City will maintain existing
levels of service within the City and will maintain or improve levels of service within the area
to be annexed.
i
Summary-Criteria 3(Timing and Sequence)
El The more areas annexed,the higher the ranking due to an increase in efficiency.
E1 To maintain citywide service levels rrquires acquisition of staff and equipment prior to annexation for Public Mirhs—Streets.
jPolice can serve the area without asignificant cdmzioninservice,due tointernal adjustments until additional polir;officers can be
r hired The City will initiate the 6-month hiring/trainingproeess prior to annexation
H TheTUSA requires the City to initiate the transfer-ofcounty numbered roads within 30 days of annexation,with full transfer
withinoncyear.
El To fund future capital improvements,annexation should occur by 2005 or have Washington County institute a parks
SDC in the interim and allow more time forannexation.
H Therefore,annex all areas of Bull Mountain in July 2005,but ramp up staffing prior to annexation based on service
needs
'ftm But.MouNTAtN ANNExATnoN PLAN—PAGE 15
D.EFFECTS ON EXISTING URBAN SERVICES PROVIDERS
An annexation plan adopted under ORS 195.205 shall include
The effects on current urban services providers.
Previous sections evaluated the City of Tigard's ability to provide urban services to the Bull
Mountain area.However,the service providers that cease serving the area would also be
affected.This section examines the impact of withdrawing the Plan Area from current
service districts,both on service quality and finances.Table 3 on page 7 provides a summary
of service provider changes.'Ihe following information was developed in coordination with
Washington County and the Tigard Water District,and is based upon estimated 2003
population and housing units(Table 1 on p.2).
Washington County_
Service Districts
Washington County reviewed how annexing the Plan Area would impact County services
and the services of its special districts based on 2003 data.It determined that there will be no
significant impact on these services.
Er Awm d Slxryiff's Patrd Disma.(ESPD)
The ESPD is funded with a two-tiered financing plan that includes a permanent rate of
$0.6365 per$1,000 and a local option dollar levy of$6,150,000 per year for five years. The
local option levy is authorized through 2008. Asa result of this financial structure,only
property tax revenue derived from the permanent rate will be affected by the proposed
annexation.
Annexation of the Plan Area would remove an estimated 3,192 properties from the ESPD
area,or 5.3%of the ESPD assessed value.As a result,the district would lose an estimated
$397,000 from the permanent rate if the entire Plan Area were to annex in one piece.
The ESPD supports a total of 94 certified officers. At the ESPD average service level of.51
officers per 1,000 population,the theoretical reduction in staff due to the annexation would
be an estimated 3.9 FTE,or 4.1%of ESPD certified officers. However,it is anticipated that
growth elsewhere in the district will mitigate the need for actual staff redactions. Therefore
the impact on the ESPD from the annexation is considered minimal,due to the expected
future growth in the remaining district over the next five years.
j U,&=RcadMainte wix Distria(URMD)
1 The property tax revenue loss to the URMD is estimated to be$153,000. This represents
i 5.5%of revenue of the URNU). The district provides the majority of its services through
contracts rather than with paid staff. Due to the relativelysmall proportion of the URMD
service area impacted by the proposed annexation and its reliance on contract-based work,
the impact on the URMD is considered rninknal.
TI-mBU LMOut-TCAIN ANNEXAMON PIAN—PAGE 16
Stmt DistrictforLigJ6dig(SDL)
Washington County operates a street lighting district throughout the County. As areas
develop,special assessment areas are established to collect and pay for street light
installation,maintenance,and power. The assessments are determined specificallyfor each
area based on actual costs and assessed annually on property tax bills.
The proposed annexation area includes 49 street lighting district assessment areas
encompassing 2,430 tax lots. The total assessment to be levied in these areas for FY 2003-
04 is$83,530.
Upon annexation,the street lighting assessments will no longer be levied. The impact of this
lost revenue on the SDL is considered insignificant:the costs to provide maintenance and
operation in the Plan Area will be absorbed by Tigard and no longer paid by the district.
Because the street lighting assessments are included on property tax bills,coordination of the
transition from the County Street District for Lighting to the City of Tigard will be
important.
Wasbingm Caany
Washington County would lose its Bull Mountain share of County gas tax at an estimated
$3.71 per capita or $27,179 due to the proposed annexation.The County would also lose an
estimated$43,475 per year in cable television franchise fees. Total Countyoperating
revenues from all sources for FY 2003-04 are$297,000,000. The loss of the County gas tax
share and cable franchise fee share will not have a significant impact on Washington County.
The County also has established a number of Road Maintenance Local Improvement
Districts.(1,113s)throughout the County. The County establishes these LIDS and determines
the assessments,but it has not imposed the assessments. The purpose of each district is to
ensure that road maintenance activities will be adequately funded as new development
occurs. They are a backup funding mechanism to the Urban Road Maintenance District.No
assessments have been levied,therefore,the districts have no fiscal impact.
Tigard Water District
'Ihe Tigard Water District(IWD)consists of approximately 3,500 accounts within the
Urban Growth Boundary(UGB).It is generally bounded byBarrows Road on the north,
Tigard citylimits on the east,Beef Bend Road on the west and King Cityon the south.
TWD,the Gryof Tigard,King City,and Durham compose the Intergovernmental Water
Board.TWD serves properties that are inside the Urban*Growth Boundary but
unincorporated.
i
FimrrialInpz=
J The district collects its only revenues from 1%of total water sales within its boundaries. All
water sales are billed and managed by the City of Tigard,and the 1%is remitted on an
annual basis.
Current accounts generate approximately$18,000 in revenue for TWD.Annexing the Plan
Area would withdraw 83%of current accounts and just less than half(48.6°/x)of the current
M-1E BUTS.MOUNTAIN ANNEXA-11ON PIAN-PAGE 17
annual revenue.A.pproxinnuely524 accounts would remain in the district,producing
approximately$9,450 in revenue(Appendix B contains all figures).
Iratitraia rrl Ingo is
As Tigard and King Cityannex land,theywithdraw those lands from TWD.If the Plan Area
is annexed,approxitnately 83%of the current accounts would be withdrawn-'Me remaining
district territory is within the UGB and would be annexed in the future.At that time,the
district will cease to exist.
The TWD Board has discussed this scenario and has been briefed by the Tigard City
Attorney on the process of dissolving the district,should the need develop.However,
annexing the Plan Area would not necessarilycause the district to dissolve since
approximately524 accounts would remain. Those accounts could be annexed into either
King Qtyor Tigard in the future.The Tigard Water District Board may choose to dissolve
the district following procedures clearly laid out in state law,that decision rests with the
TWD Board.
Other Districts
The Plan Area currently is served byTualatin Valley Fire and Rescue(TVF&R),Trildet,and
Clean Water Services. The proposed annexation will have no impacts on TVF&P,or Trtil let,
which also provide service to the Gty of Tigard.
The City of Tigard and Clean Water Services have entered into an agreement to transfer
operation and maintenance of a portion of the Clean Water Services territory,including the
Plan Area,to the City of Tigard effective January 1,2005. The City is already scheduled to
provide these services regardless of annexation.Therefore,the annexation of this territory to
the Gtyof Tigard is anticipated to have no impact on Clean Water Services.
Summary:Criteria 4(Effects on Existing Service Providers)
0 Washington County's services orthe services of its special districts would not be significantly impacted by
thcannexatiort.
H The Tigard Water District would lose 83%of currenr accounts and 48.6%of current annual revenue.
However,this does not cause the district to dissolve,as it can continue to serve its remaining customers.
r 0 Other service providers would not be significantly impacted
i
L
i
i
'ME Bur.Mout-rm N At R mxKnoN PLAN—PAGE 18
E.LONGTERM BENEFITS OF THE PLAN
An annexation plan adopted under ORS 195.205 shall include
The long-term benefits of the annexation plan.
Individual annexations will occur in the Plazt Area with or without an annexation plan.
Currently,annexations occur at the owner's request,resulting in a piecemeal approach to
incorporation.In contrast,7heBud MaartainAnrrxntianPlmz provides a comprehensive
strategy for annexation,and long-term planning offers long-term benefits:
• Completing the community.'Annexation would allow the City to plan for growth
on Bull Mountain with an updated comprehensive plan for the entire community.
The plan presents a significant step toward completing our community as it was
envisioned 20 years ago.
• Smooth transition.All needed services have been identified,along with interim
measures to get these services on-line prior to annexation.Citizens can depend on a
smooth transition.
• Efficiency.Ensures that annexations occur in an orderly mariner.It eliminates
piecemeal annexations,which can create inefficiencies for service providers due to
irregular boundaries.By coordinating services,agencies assure that services are not
duplicated and are provided by the most appropriate provider,leading to cost-
savings and more efficient services.
• Certaintyin Service Provision.The planestablishes a date for annexation and
service area adjustments,which allows the City,County and affected special districts
to plan for changes and capital improvements.The plan provides certainty for
homeowners and developments on annexation's timeline,which can be factored into
future decisions in the Plan Area.
Urban services by an urban provider.Bull Mountain has grown beyond its neral
roots,and become an urbanized area with streets,sidewalls,and services that require
city-level maintenance.Urban areas need urban service providers,as envisioned in
the Tigard and Washington Cour co
tg hingt ty mprehensive pL-tr,s. Cities,not counties,are
i best equipped to provide urban services,and past agreements have assigned this role
j to Tigard in Bull Mountain.Bull Mountain would receive its services from a provider
i just down the street who can respond quickly to service needs.Maintaining facilities
at higher levels protects the original investment and prevents more costly
improvements in the long nut,rnaximizi a available funds.
• Known costs and benefits.The plan clarified the costs and benefits of annexation
to Bull Mountain residents,citizens of Tigard,the City and the County,and to all
related agencies.By anticipating future needs,the analysis concluded that services
can be provided to both Bull Mountain and current residents without a significant
THE BVLLMOUNCAINArmXAIIONPLAN—PAGE 19
reduction in services.It assures current Tigard residents theycan continue to relyon
the same standard of service they receive today. Annexation will not raise taxes for
current Tigard residents.
• Equity.Annexation wou d allow all users to equitably share service costs.Bull
Mountain residents enjoy Tigard paras and its library,but Tigard resident taxies pay
for parks maintenance and almost half of the library capital costs(the other half
comes from the County librarysystem,for which all County residents pay).With
annexation,everyone would pay for the same service,and facilities will benefit from
increased maintenance dollars.
• Parks services.Tigard provides parls services onlyto the incorporated area.Upon
annexation,Bull Mountain will receive resident privileges.Once the area is annexed,
Tigard can collect funds for acquisition,planning and development of parks,
including Cache Creek in the North subarea.
• Unify the cornrriunity.As citizens of Tigard,Bull Mountain residents would have a
say on local issues that affect their community's future.Although Tigard has
included Bull Mountain residents in its planning efforts(Me Parks Master Plan,
Tigard Beyond Tomorrow),Bull Mountain residents cannot vote on Tigard issues or
its leaders,or run for City Council.Considering this plan together would help both
parties work together for their future.
Most of all,an annexation plan takes the guesswork out of future annexations.It is a
blueprint for the Plan Area that clearly quantifies the future:vbm will annexation happen,
la mwill it occur,vlat services can residents expect,and bommuch will it cost,and vbyit's
going to happen.Both the Plan Area and the Citycan plan for the future,as they move
closer to completing their community.
Summary.Criteria 5 (Long-Term Benefits)
EI Theplan provides a mmprehensiveapproach to annexation.The plan'sbenefits include certainty,efficiency,
smooth transition,more capital improvement dollars,urban services by an urban provider,quantifying the
costs and benefits,cquity,parks,and unifyingthe community.
EI It allows the city and residents to plan for Bull Mountain's future.
TY-m Buu,MOUNCAiNANmxA'nON PLAN—PAGE 20
III.ADDITIONAL ANNEXATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS
7be Bull NaauainArvrradm Plan proposes an orderly transition of services.It addresses the
criteria contained in ORS 195.220-
1. Local standards of urban service availability requited as a precondition of
annexation;
2. The planned schedule for providing urban services to the annexed territory,
3. The timing and sequence of annexation;
4. The effects on existing urban services providers;
5. The long-term benefits of the annexation plan
The plan process includes two other considerations:
L Urban Services Agreement with all urban services providers in the Plan Area.All
providers in the Plan Area signed the Tigard Urban Service Agreement,and it took effect in
February 2003.A copy is included as Appendix D_
2.Fiscal impact agreement between the county and annexing city if the annexation causes
reductions in the county property tax revenues(compression).The Washington County
Finance Department conducted the following analysis:
ORS 195.205(2)(b)states that`The territory contained in the annexation plan is subject to
an agreement between the city and county addressing fiscal impacts,if the annexation is by
city and will cause reductions in the countypropertytax revenues by operation of section
I1b,Article XI of the Oregon Constitution."
Section 11b,Article XI of the Oregon Constitution(commonly known as Measure 5)limits
total non-school property tax rates to no more than$10 per$1,000 of assessed valuation. If
the tax rates of all non-school taxing jurisdictions exceed$10 per$1,000,the rates of each
district are proportionately reduced to bring the total under the$10 limit. This process is
called compression.
The proposed Bull Mountain annexation area
4309 makes up the majority of tax code area 23.78
and 51.78. The government tax rate in both
code areas for FY 2003-04 was$6.0101 per
$1,000. With tax rate adjustments in both
i codes due to the proposed annexation,the
estimated resulting rate will be$7.1126 per'
i ! $1,000. This rate is well below the$10
Measure 5 cap and therefore compression is
not hlrelyto occur in the near future.The
Plan Area will continue to pay County taxes
after annexation,as all Tigard areas do.
As a result,no agreement between the City
and the County is required under this section because annexation of the Plan Area is not
expected to cause reductions in County property tax revenues due to compression.
M-IF Burs.M0UWAW ANMXA'ItoN PLAN—PAGE 21
Summary.All Requirements for Annexation Plans
1.Plan Criteria
0 Local standards of urban service availability required as a precondition of
annexation;
H The planned sc(vedule for providing urban services to the annexed
territory,
H The tinning and sequence of annexation;
H The effects on existing urban services providers;
H The long-term benefits of the annexation plan.
2.Pte-Requisite
Q Urban Service Agreements in place.(11BA;effective February 2003)
3.Fiscal Impact Agreement Between City and County if Compression Occurs
® Countyproperty taxes will not be reduced due to compression.No
fiscal agreement is required.
®.All requirements have been addressed.
a
i
TALE EVU MOUNTAIN ANMXAT[ON PLAN-PAGE 22
IV.CoNCLIBION
7heBrd1MoraxainArm=a&nPlan presents a systematic and efficient approach to annex
unincorporated Bull Mountain and a trove toward completing the Tigard community.The
plan provides a proposal for Tigard to annex all areas of Bull Mountain in 2005.
Using existing service agreements among agencies and cost-benefit analyses,the plan is
grounded solidlyon state lawORS195220 and addrsses all the ORS195.220 criteria:the
provision(how and when)of urban services,annexation's impact on existing providers,the
timing and sequence of annexation,and the plan's long-term benefits.
The plan complies with state and Metro criteria.It also complies with the applicable City of
Tigard CommunityDevelopment Code and Comprehensive Plan policies.The annexation
plan provides a blueprint for annexation,and for constructing an united Tigard and Bull
Mountain community.
i
i
i
i
r
r
M-E Bul.h4ouLrmmAmgExAmom PLAN—PAGE 23
APPENDIX A
G!_.OS.SARY
Annexation:The act of permanently bringing unincorporated land areas into a Gcy by
transferring properties from the County tax roll to the City tax roll.Householders become
residents of the annexing city,and receive City resident services.
Annexation Effective Date:Following a yes vote and verification of results,annexation
would become effective day one of the following fiscal year((uly 1,2005).
Availability:The Service is provided to the area and the infrastructure is present.It does not
mean that each ha%s4hold receives the actual service;for example,in the case of sewer,
hook-ups are available in the area,but some households maintain septic tanks until they
decide to connect
Comprehensive Plan:The document that envisions how lands will be used and developed
in a communityand sets policy accordingly.It coordinates all functional and natural systems
(ie.,facilities and natural resources).Each Oregon jurisdiction is required bystate land-use
planning laws to have an adopted comprehensive plan_The plan includes a generalized land
use map.The land-use zoning code implements the comprehensive plan_Tigard's is available
on its website,www.ci.tigard.orus
Long-Range Planning:Arm of CommunityDevelopment that is tasked with meeting State
Plannin&.Goals_Staff develops long-term land use and transportation strategies,and plans
for future growth
Plan Area:The area proposed to be annexed,as shown on Map 1,page 4.
Unincorporated:Lands that are not located inside any city limits.These areas are governed
by Washington County.
Urban Growth Boundary(UGB):Boundary that divides metropolitan areas from the
surrounding nasal areas.Areas within the UGB can be developed at urban standards;areas
C outside the UGB cannot.
0
j Urban Planning Area:The Catyof'I'ngard's ultimate boundary,determined through the
v Urbain Planning Area Agreement with Washington County_
i Urban Service:Services that typicallyare provided to incorporated areas_ORS195 defines
urban services as sanutarysewers,water,fire protectiort,parks,open space,recreation,
streets,roads and mass transit.71jeBull MaarainAnmcaLibrzMan also considers the following
services as urban:police,storm sewer,building and development seivices,and street light
maintenance.
TY M BULL MOLMAIN ANNEX&MON PIAN—PAGE 24
Urbanization:To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban
land use,consistent with State Planning Goal 14(Urbanisation).Land within the boundaries
separating urbanizable land from rural land(UGB)is considered available over time for
urban uses.
A.CRON�CMS:
ORS:Oregon Revised Statutes;state law_
SDC-s:System Development Charges.Fees paid by new development to fund future capital
improvements.SDCs act as growth management tools by helping pay for system
improvements needed as population and households increase.
1
-M-SUL Tigard U"Services Agreement Signed by the City,Washington County,and all
cu rcnt and future service providers for the unincorporated areas within Tigard's planning
area.Determines future service providers and process for transferring services between
providers upon annexation.The'MSA took effect in February 2003,and is a.pre-requisite
for an annexation plan.
UGB:Urban Growth Boundary.Divides'metropolitan areas from the surrounding rural
areas.Areas within the'UGB can be developed at urban standards;areas outside the UGB
canner
UPAA Urban Planning Area Agreement An agreement between Washington County and
City,of Tigard which established Bull Mountain as part of the City's Urban Planning Area.It-was
onginally.signed in 1983 and updated most recently in fall 2003.
USIGA:Urban Services Intergovernmental Agreement An agreement between Washington
County and the City of Tigard in which the City of Tigard agreed to provide certain urban
services to unincorporated areas(including Bull Mountain)_It was signed in 2002-
THE
002THE BUMMOUMMAIN ANNEXATION PLAN—PAGE 25
Appendix B
Bull Mountain Annexation Plan
Fiscal Analysis update
November 2003
The City of Tigard has conducted two previous studies of the impacts of
annexing the Bull Mountain area. The Bull Mountain Annexation Study was
completed in November 2001. The Public Facilities and Services Assessment
Report for the Bull Mountain Area(draft)was completed in July 2003_ Both
studies looked at a variety of factors,including the costs of direct service to the
Bull Mountain area and revenues that would be generated to pay for those
services. These analyses did not attempt to calculate central administrative
costs on the asggFnption that the existing central administrative support structure
could absorb the additional workload that would come with annexation of
additional territory_
The earlier studies.looked at the costs and revenues associated with annexation
at points in time(current,maximum build-out,and medium build-out in the
Annexation Study;and 2005,2010,and 2015 in Draft Public Facilities and
Services Assessment Report.) For the purposes of this Annexation Plan,it is
necessary to took at the total cost of service at the point of full development
(which may not be the same as developing to the maximum capacity_) For the
purposes of this analysis,we have assumed that the area will reacts maximum
development by 2015..Accordingly,this Plan looks at the cost of providing the `
level of services needed in.2015 and the operating revenues generated at that
level of'development_
In addition to operating costs and revenues,it is also necessary to analyze one-
time capital needs and revenues. The analysis in this Plan looked at the level of
one-time capital revenues generated from the point of annexation(assumed to
be 2004)to the level of development anticipated in 2015.
The fiscal impacts of the earlier studies were calculated in 2001 and 2002
dollars. For purposes of this Annexation Plan,those fiscal analyses were
updated to reflect 2003 dollars. No assumptions for future inflation were built into
either the revenue or cost estimates.
Cost and revenue projections for the study area rest on three primary footings:
population,number of housing units,and current assessed values_
First,staff reviewed and updated housing unit and population figures for all four
sub areas. There have been a number of annexations to the City of Tigard within
the study areas since 2002. Each annexation changed the boundaries of the
study area and reduced the number of housing units and population remaining to
be annexed. In addition,staff reviewed boundaries between sub areas to make
sure that they followed subdivision and tax lot lines. Based on this review,staff
Appendix B
changed the boundary between the North and West sub areas_ Finally,staff
updated housing unit and population figures to reflect recent development.
Washington County staff used the updated maps of the Bull Mountain study area
and sub areas to determine current assessed values.
The net effect of the changes discussed above were minor adjustments to the
number of housing units and population. Given the small size of these
adjustments,staff determined that earlier work to determine the basic costs of
ongoing services to,and one-time capital needs of the study areas were still
valid. Two corrections were identified,however. The November 2001 study
identified two costs which were inadvertently omitted for the July 2003 study: the
costs of rec pq,13 new police officers required to serve the Bull Mountain area
and the cost of expanding the Police Department building to house the additional
officers. Both costs have been added back into the Annexation Plan. Finally,all
operating costs were increased by the Consumer Price Index of 1.68%to update
the 2002 projections to 2003 dollars. All one-time capital costs were updated by
the Construction Cost Index of 2.1%to reflect 2003 dollars.
Staff also reviewed and updated all revenue projections. Since the earlier two
studies,some fees and charges have been increased. In addition,other
revenues are estimated on a per capita or per housing unit basis. Many of those
revenues have fluctuated,which required updating of per capita and per housing
unit rates. These revised rates were then applied to the updated housing unit
and population figures.
Finally,since the publication of the two earlier reports,a citizen Transportation
Funding Task Force has recommended the adoption of a street maintenance fee
to help pay for major maintenance of the street system. Statewide,most
jurisdictions are dealing with insufficient gas tax and other street-related
revenues which are impacting their ability to maintain their street-systems- Many
jurisdictions,including Tigard, are looking for additional funding sources such as
the street maintenance fee.
This recommendation has been presented to the City Council,which has directed
staff to prepare an ordinance to implement the fee and to bring that ordinance
back to the Council for their consideration.(Note:Council has since approved
1 Ordinance 3-10 on Nov. 18,2003 to establish and impose the fee;passed
Resolution 4-12 on Feb.24,2004,which established the rates;and
implementation began April 1,2004_Appendix C.the Tax Rate Table,includes
the residential Street Maintenance Fee rate in its calculations.)
In updating the earlier financial analyses,staff has calculated the annual
revenues from a street maintenance fee structured as recommended by the
Transportation Funding Task Force,and calculated how much revenue that fee
would produce from the Bull Mountain Annexation area in 2004- The following
Appendix B
table shows how much revenue would be generated in 2004 from the Bull
Mountain area if this fee is adopted by the Tigard City Council and Bull Mountain
is annexed. These revenues would help to offset costs shown on the following
tables charged to the Gas Tax Fund.
Table 1
Potential 2004 Bull Mountain Street Maintenance Fee Revenues
NorthI West South East Total
$26,743 $9,319 $31,680 $4,514 $72,257
The following tabWs present the updated cost and revenue projections for the
Bull Mountain area.
Table 2a
Projected Revenues and Costs by Fund for the Bull Mountain Area,North Unit
Operating Costs
Fund Revenue Operating Cost Balance
General $1,001,368 $533,298 $468,070
Gas Tax $121,782 $147,302 $25,520
Sanitary Sewer $72,195 $47,977 $24,218
Storm Sewer $41,112 $45,138 $4,026
Water $535,188 $349,271 $185,917
Table 2b
Projected Revenues and Costs by Fund for the Bull Mountain Area,North Unit
One-Time Capital Costs
Fund Fund Balance/ One-Time Capital Balance
Capital Revenue Cost
General $468,070 $O $468,070
Gas Tax ($25,5201 $297,111 $322,631
Sanitary Sewer $309,113 $295,069 $14,044
Storm Sewer $54,474 $0 $54,474
i Water $185,917 $0 $185,917
Traffic Im acd Fee $318,240 $3,461,190 $3,142,950
Parks CIP $204,399 $453,120 $248,721
' Water SDC $361,296 $367,560 $6,264
Table 3a
Projected Revenues and Costs by Fund for the Bull Mountain Area,West Unit
Operating Costs
Fund Revenue Operating Cost Balance
General $809,0971 $302,215 1 $506,881
Appendix B
Gas Tax $45,094 $293,020. $247,927
Sanitary Sewer $28,385 $20,386 $7,999
Storm Sewer $16,164 $17,737 $1,573
Water $210.4201 $147,639
$62,781
Table 3b
Projected Revenues and Costs by Fund for the Butt Mountain Area,West Unit
One-Time Capital Costs
Fund Fund Balance/ jOne-TjZmeapital BalanceCa ital Revenue General $506,881 $0 $506,881
$247,927 5,489 $56Sanita Sewer $356,204 4,917 $28713
Storm Sewer $69,927 $O $69,927
Water $62,781 $0 $62,781
[Parks
ffic fm aet Fee $388,960 $530,920 $141,960
CIP $249,821 $1,914,375
ter SDC $291,863 $0 $1.664,554
$291,863
Table 4a
Projected Revenues and Costs by Fund for the Bull Mountain Area,South Unit
Operating Costs
Fund Revenue O ratio Cost Balance
General $1,261,667 $625,477
Gas Tax $134,774 $636,190
$233,934 $99,160
SanitarySewer $84,585 $52,733 $31,852
Storm Sewer $48,468 $49,862 $1,694
Water $627,042 $388,113
$238,929
Table 4b
Projected Revenues and Costs by Fund for the Bull Mountain Area, South Unit
One-Time Capital Costs
i
Fund i ---Fund Balance/ One-Time Capital Balance
Ca ital Revenue Cost
General $636,190 $272,811 - $363,379
Gas.Tax $99,160 $2,552,500 $2,651,660
Sanita Sewer $316,747 $95,974 $220,773
Storm Sewer $56,806 $O $56,806
Water $238,929 $O $238,929
Traffic Impact Fee $318,240 $1,255,830 $937,590
Parks CIP $204,399 $1,914,375 $1,709,976
Water SDC $361,296_ $366,641 $5,345
Appendix B
Table Sa
Projected Revenues and Costs by Fund for the Bull Mountain Area,East Unit
Operating Costs
Fund Revenue O eratin Cost Balance
General $1,649,439 $262,738 $1,386,701
Gas Tax $20,737 $50,231 $29,494
SanitarySewer $13,718 $13,811 $93
Storm Sewer t� $7,812 $11,208 $3,396
Water $101,695 $147,944 $46,249
Table 5b
Projected Revenues and Costs by Fund for the Bull Mountain Area,East-Unit
One-Time Capital Costs
Fund Fund Balance/_ - One-Time Capital Balance
Capital Revenue Cost
General $1,386,701 $0 $1,386,701
Gas Tax $29,494 $581,970 $611,464
Sancta Sewer $1,166,272 $499,269 $667,003
Storm Fewer $236,104 $O $236,1G4
Water $46,249 $1,337,510 $1,383,759
Traffic Im act Fee $1,302,880 $2,695,440 $1,392,560
Parks CIP $836,813 $5,743;125 $4,906,312
Water SDC $1,479,152 $9,025,640 $7,54ti,488
Table 6a
Projected Revenues and Costs by Fund for the Bull Mountain Area,Total Area
Operating Costs
i
Fund Revenue O ratio Cost Balance
I General $4,721,571 $1,723,729 $2,997,842
Gas Tax $322,386 $724,487 $402,101
Sanita Sewer $198,883 $134,907 - $63,976
Storm Sewer $113,256 $123,945. $10,689
Water $1,474,345 $1,032,967 $441,378
Table 6b
Projected Revenues and Costs by Fund for the Bull Mountain Area,Total Area
One-Time Capital Costs
Fund Fund Balance/ I One-Time Capital Balance
Appendix B
Ca ital Revenue Cost
General $2,997,842
Gas Tax $997.81 $272,811 $2,725,031
Santa Sewer $3,747,070 $4,148,171
Storm Sewer $2.117,311 $1,275,229 $873,107
Water $417,311 $0
$441,378 $1,337,510 $`117,311
Traffic Im ct Fee $2,328,320 $896,132
Parks CIP
Water SDC $1,495,432 1 $10,024,995 $8,529,563
$2,493,607 $9,759,841 $7,266,234
The results of these analyses show that the Bull Mountain annexation area will
generally more than pay for direct general governmental operational services
(Primarily poll and planning)and for direct operations of the two primary
governmental u 7i' s serving the area(water and sanitary sewer). The m
exception to this trend is the operation of the street system_ or
The operaajtion of the
street system is funded primarily from state and county gas taxes. Gas tax
revenues attributable to the Bull Mountain area are insufficient to co
costs of street in that area_ ver operating
One-time capital costs are paid for by a combination of operating fund balances
and dedicated capital revenues. A comparison of available resources versus
ut,the gidentified capital needs reveals major revenue shortfalls for most service areas_
Simply pull Mountain ar
bdth
ea by itself will not produce enough revenues to
uile capital facilities it needs for streets,parks,-and water.
It is important to note that when looked at from a City perspective, this analysis
can be misleading. The City operates a number of systems.that serve the entire
City(including in some cases the Bull Mountain area whether or not it is
annexed);not discrete geographical areas_ These systems include those
covered in this analysis: Police,Streets,Water, Sanitary Sewer,storm Sewer,
Parks,and Planning services_ Any one discrete geographical area in the City or
adjacent to the City may or may not produce sufficient revenues to serve that
area,but what is important is that the system as a whole can provide services to
the entire area. The City's syssh
tems are financially strong,and these services can
be provided to the entire area, including Bull Mountain ould it be annexed to
the City_
Conversely,this analysis can be very instructive when looked at from the
perspective of an area being considered annexation_ If the area were to attempt
to obtain these same services at the level provided by the City of Tigard as a
stand alone district,it may or may not be able to cover operating costs. It would
be unable to pay for needed capital improvements without a substantial influx of
additional revenues_
Appendix B
Tigard Water District
August 28,2003
Bull Mountain Accounts
Route#2,10,12.36.37.38.39.42,3,41(000-0860,8023-9999)
Water Sates(Previous
Customer Type aia' #Active Accounts #Suspended Accounts 12 Months)
Residential 2.880 - 69 $837,838.05
Commercial 2 0 $1,554.71
Irrigation 26 7 $27,314.56
Multi+amily 27 O $30,508.58
Total 2,935 76 $897,215.90
All Other TWD Accounts
Route#,9,2,98,86,84,41(0851-8022)
Residential 459 12 $101,340.91
Commercial 4 3 $3,996.64
Irrigation 7 O $4,949.84
Multi-Family 38 1 $834,844.73
L Total 508 16 $945,132.12
C
Note: Given the water sales for the previous twelve month period,the Tigard Water District would
i receive$8,972.16 in revenue.
. APPfENDIXc
ma##m #amq\#f 7q asaa#em#am mm
■ a■-. -- ° a_caa�#aaa a p-
#!} - . -
pR#qv °a;@fq¥mq !gA8a ama: a
-zi
§) §§k)§§k
af! 1.4 . .
. a
i
S § 9g§S V? -_
Tc
a§:2)2553§ !/
\ |{§2
§�k �
• f�Q} #_! -
f 727 ` ;■ / fka
&k*} |)
�}} k�``I
a .T
} .7.
\ }
k
APPENDIX D
TIGARD URBAN SERVICE AGREEMENT
November 26,2002
This AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between Washington County,a municipal
eorpotation of the State of Oregon,hereinafter"COUNTY."the City of Tigard,a municipal
corporation of the State of Oregon,hereinafter"CTTY,^Metro,a metropolitan service district of
the State of Oregon,hereinafter"METRO,"and the following Special Districts of the State of
Oregon,hereinafter"DISTRICT(S):'
Clean Water Services;
$0hd Water District;
Tri-Met;
Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District;
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District;and
Tualatin Valley Water District
RECITALS
WHEREAS,ORS 195.025(1)requires METRO,through its regional coordination
responsibilities,to review urban service agreements affecting land use,including planning
activities of the counties,cities,special districts,state agencies;and
WHEREAS,ORS 195A20(4)(e)requires cooperative agreements to specify the units of local
government which shall be parties to an urban service agreement under ORS 195.065;and
WHEREAS,ORS 195.065(1)requires units of local government that provide an urban service
within an urban growth boundary to enter into an urban service agreement that specifies the unit
of government that:will deliver the services,sets forth the functional role of each service
provider,determines the future servicearea,and assigns responsibilities for planning and
coordination of services;and
WHEREAS,ORS 195.065(1)and(2)require that the COUNTY shall be responsible for:
I. Convening representatives of all cities and special districts that provide or declare an interest
in providing an urban service inside an urban growth boundary within the county that has a
population greater than 2,500 persons for the purpose of negotiating an urban service
i agreetnent;
j
2. Consulting with recognized community planning organizations within the area affected by
the urban service agreement;and
3. Notifying Metro in advance of meetings to negotiate an urban service agreement to enable
Metro's review;and
Tigard Urban Service Agreement .
November-26,2002
Page I
WHEREAS,ORS 195.075(1)requites urban service agreements to provide for the continuation
of an adequate level of urban services to the entire area that each provider serves and to specify if
there is a significant reduction in the territory of a special service district;and
WHEREAS,ORS 195.075(1)requires that ifthere is a significant reduction in territory,the
agreement shall specify how the remaining portion of the district is to receive services in an
affordable manner,and
WHEREAS,ORS 195.205 TO 195.235 grant authority to cities and districts(as defined by ORS
198.010)to annex lands within an urban growth boundary,subject to voter approval,if the city
or district enacts an annexation plan adopted pursuant to ORS 195.020,195.060 to 195.085,
195.145 to 195235,197.005,197.319,197.320,197.335,and 223.304,and if the city or district
has entered into ucbap service agreements with the county,cities and special districts which
provide urban sefvi06s within the affected area;and
WHEREAS,ORS 197.175 requires cities and counties to prepare,adopt,amend,and revise their
comprehensive plans in compliance with statewide planning goals,and enact land use regulations
to implement their comprehensive plans;and
WHEREAS,Statewide Planning Goals 2,11,and 14 require cities and counties to plan,in
cooperation with all affected agencies and special districts,for the urbanization of lands within
an urban growth boundary,and ensure the timely,orderly,and efficient extension of public
facilities and urban services.
NOW,THEREFORE,the premises being in general as stated in the foregoing recitals,it is
agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows:
I: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
A_ Parties to this AGREEMENT shall provide land use planning notice to each other in
accordance with the provision of the"Cooperative Agreements,"developed per ORS
195.020(4xe).
B. The parties to this AGREEMENT are designated as the appropriate provider of services
to the citizens residing within their boundaries as specified in this AGREEMENT.
C. The CITY is designated as the appropriate,provider of services to citizens residing within
t its boundaries and to adjacent unincorporated areas subject to this AGREEMENT as
shown on Map A,except for those services that are to be provided by another party as
i specified in this AGREEMENT.
1
D. The.CfTY and COUNTY wilt be supportive ofannexations to the CITY over-tirne. The
t CITY shall endeavor to annex the unincorporated areas shown on.Map A,in keeping
with the following schedule:
1. Near to mid-term(3 to 5 years): Bull Mountain area and unincorporated lands north
of the Tualatin River and south of Durham Road and
Tigard Urban Service Agreement
November 26,2002
Page 2
2. Far-term(10 years or later):Metzger area.
I-,Pursuant to ORS 195.205,the CfrY and DISTRICTS reserve the right and may,
subsequent to the enactment of this AGREEMENT,develop an annexation pian or pians
in reliance upon this AGREEMENT in accordance with ORS 195.205 to 220.
F. In keeping with the County 2000 Strategic Plan or its successor,the COUNTY will
focus its energies on those services that provide county-wide benefit and transition out of
providing municipal services that may benefit specific geographic areas or districts_ lite
COUNTY recognizes cities and special service districts as the ultimate municipal service
providers as specified in this AGREEMENT. The COUNTY also recognizes cities as
the ultimate local governance provider to the urban area_
G. Within twelve months of the effective date of this AGREEMENT and prior to any
consolidation or transfer of duties or any single or multiple annexations totaling twenty
acres,the parties shall identify any duties performed by the parties that will or may be
assumed or transferred from one party to another party by annexation,consolidation or
agreement. The affected parties shall identify how the duties will be transferred or
assumed,including the transfer of employees and equipment The process to transfer
duties,employees and equipment shall account for the cumulative effects ofannexation,
consolidation and transfer by agreemenL This process shall also address targe scale
annexations and the large scale transfer of duties by consolidation or agreement In the
event the affected parties cannot agree upon the processes to transfer duties,employees
and equipment,the provisions of Section VII of this AGREEMENT shall be used to
resolve the dispute.
FL..The COUNTY shall have the responsibility for convening representatives for the purpose
of amending this AGREEMENT,pursuant to ORS 195.065(2)(a).
IL AGREEMENT COORDINATION
A. Existing intergovernmental agreements that are consistent with this AGREEMENT
shall remain in force. This AGREEMENT shalt control provisions of existing
intergovernmental agreements that are inconsistent with the terms of this
-AGREEMENT_ This AGREEMENT does not preclude any party from amending an
existing inter-governmental agreement or entering into a new inter-govemruental
agreement with one or more parties for a service addressed in this AGREEMENT,
provided such an agreement is consistent with the provisions of this AGREEMENT.
B_ The CITY and COUNTY have entered into an intergovernmental agreement for the
CITY provision of building,land development and specific road services on behalf
of the COUNTY to the unincorporated lands is the Bull Mountain area__
1
t C. CITY and COUNTY shall endeavor to take all action necessary to cause their
comprehensive plans to be amended to be consistent with this AGREEMENT within
twelve months ofexecution of this AGREEMENT,but no later than sixteen months
from the date of execution.
Tigard Urban Service Agreement '
November 26,-2002
Page 3
IIL AREA AFFECTED BY AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT applies to the-Tigard Urban Service Area(TIISA)as shown on Map
A and properties added to the Regional Urban Growth Boundary(UGB)that are to be
annexed to the CITY in the fugue as described below in Section VIIL
TV. URBAN SERVICE PROVIDERS
A- The service provisions of this AGREEMENT,as described in Exhibits A through G,
establish the providers and elements of urban services for the geographic area
covered in this AGREEMENT';and
B. The Vl� ing urban services are addressed in this AGREE
EMNT_
1_ Fire Protection and Emergency Services(Exhibit A);
2. Public Transit(Exhibit B);
3. Law Enforcement(Exhibit C);
4. Parics,Recreation,and Open Space(Exhibit D);
5: Roads and Streets(Exhibit E);
6. Sanitary Sewer and Storni Water(Exhibit F);and
7. Water Service(Exhibit G).
V ASSIGNABQ,TTY
No assignment of any party's rights or obligations under this AGREEMENT to a
different,new or consolidated or merged entity shall be effective without the prior
consent of the other parties affected thereby.Any party to this AGREEMENT who
proposes a formation,merger,consolidation,dissolution,or other major boundary
change shall notify all other parties of the availability of the reports or studies required
by Oregon State Statutes to be prepared as part of the proposal.
VI. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT shall become effective upon full execution by all parties.
VIL TERM OF TIIE AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT shall continue to be in effect as long as required understate law.
The COUNTY shall be responsible for convening the
i g" parties to this AGREEMENT for
the review or modification of this AGREEMENT,pursuant to Section VIIL
Tigard Urban Service Agmement _
November 26;2002
Page 4
VUL PROCESS FOR V--VIEW AND MODIFICATION OF THE AGREEMENT
A. Parties shall periodically review the provisions of this AGREEMENT in order to
evaluate the effectiveness of the processes set forth herein and to propose any
necessary or beneficial amendments to address considerations of ORS 195.070 and
ORS 195.075.
B. Any party may propose modifications to this agreement to address concerns or
changes in circumstances_
C. The body of this AGREEMENT(Recitals and Sections I through IX)may only be
changed by written consent of all affected patties. Amendments to the exhibits of
this%GF EEMENT may be made upon written consent of the parties identified in
eacfi eAibiL
D. The periodic review of this AGREEMENT and all proposed modifications to this
AGREEMENT shall be coordinated by the COUNTY. All requests for the periodic
review of this AGREEMENT and all proposed modifications shall be considered in a
timely manner and all parties shall receive notice of any proposed amendment Only
those patties affected by an amendment shall sign the amended agreement All
amendments that include boundary changes shall complywith Chapter 3.09 of the
METRO Code or its successor.
E. Lands added to the Regional Urban Growth Boundary that are determined to be
annexed to the CITY in the future by separate process,such an Urban Reserve Plan,
shall be subject to this AGREEMENT. The appropriate service providers to new
urban lands for the services addressed in this AGREEMENT shall be determined
through the provisions of this Section unless those determinations are made through
the development of an Urban Reserve Plan and all affected parties agree to the
service determinations. This AGREEMENT shall be amended to address new urban
lands and reflect the service provider determinations consistent with the provisions
of this Section.
IX. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
If;dispute arises between or among the parties regarding breach of this AGREEMENT
or interpretation of any term thereof,those parties shall first attempt to resolve the
dispute by negotiation prior to any other contested case process. If negotiation fails to
1 resolve the dispute,the parties agree to submit the matter to non-binding mediation_
Only after these steps have been exhausted will the[natter be submitted to arbitration_
i
I Step I—Negotiation. The managers or other persons designated by each of the disputing
1 parties will negotiate on behalf of the entities they represent The issues of the dispute
shall be reduced to writing and each manager shall then meet and attempt to resolve the
issue. If the dispute is resolved with this step,there shall be a written determination of
such resolution signed by each manager,which shall be binding upon the parties_
Tigard Urban Service Agreernent
November 26,2002
. Page 5
Step 2_Mediation. If the dispute cannot be resolved within 30 days of initiation of step
1,a party shall request in writing that the matter be submitted to non-binding mediation.
The parties shall use good-faith efforts to.agree on a mediator. If they cannot agree,the
parties shall request a list of five knediatots.fiom an entity or firm providing mediation
Services.The parties will attempt to mudtaUyagree on a mediator from the list provided,
but if they cannot agree,each party shall select one name and the two mediators shall
jointly select a third mediator. The dispute shall be heard by the third mediator and any
common costs of mediation shall be borne equally by the parties,who shall each bear
their own costs and fees therefore. If the issue is resolved at this Step,then a written
determination of such resolution shall be signed by each manager and shall be binding
upon the parties.
Step 3 _ tration.After exhaustion of-steps 1 and 2 above,the matter shall be settled
by biitration in Washington County.Oregon,in accordance with the
Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association,the rules of the
Arbitration Service of Portland,or any other'rutes mutually agreed to,pursuant to ORS
190.210.790,The arbitration shall be before a singlearbitrator,nothing sba11 prevent the
parties from mutually selecting an arbitrator or panel thereof who is not pail of the AAA
panel and agreeing upon arbitration rules and procedures.The cost of arbitration shall be
Shared equally.The arbitration shall be held within 60 days of selection of the arbitrator
upless otherwise agreed to by the parties. The decision shall be issued within 60 days of
arbitration
X. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE
Ifany portion of this AGREEMENT is declared invalid,or unconstitutional by a court of
cpmpetent jurisdiction,such portion shall be deemed a separate,distinct,and
independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the'remaining
portions of this AGREEMENT-
XL SIGNATURES OF PARTIES TO AGREEMENT
In witness whereof,this AGREEMENT is executed by the authorized representatives of
the COUNTY,CITY,DLSTRICTS,and METRO. The panics,by their representative's
signatures to this AGREEMENT,signify that each has read the AGREEMENT,
` understands its terns,and agrees to be bound thereby.
7
g
h
a_
Tigard Urban Service Agreement
Novembcr26,2002
PAge6
CITY OF TIGARD
By:
James E_Griffith.Mayor Date
Approved as to Form:
By:
City Attorney
c y�
C
4
j
J
J
Tigard"Urban.ServiceAgreaneat - -
November26,2002>
page 7
TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE AND RESCUE DISTRICT
sy,
Chairman,Board of Directors Date
Approved as to Form:
By:
District Counsel
i
i
a :
l
t
Tigard Urban Service Ageement
November 26,2002
Page 8
TUALATIN HILLS PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT
By-
President,Board of Directors Date
Approved as to Form:
By:
District Counsel
1
i
I
Tigard UA*m Service Agreement
November 26,2002
Page 9
Txl-Msr
By_
General Manager Date
Approved as to Forte:
By_
District Counsel
1
t
1
I
I
Tigatd Urban Service Agremoent
November26,2002
Page 10
CLEAN WATER SERVICES
By.
Tom Brian,Chair Date
Board of D"uectors
Approved as to Form:
By
District Counsel
7
1
7
i
i -
TigardurbanServiooAff emeut
Novanber26,2002
Page l I
TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
By:
Chairman,Board of Directors Date
Approved as to Form:
By_
District Counsel
sy
Tigard Urban Savor Ageement
Novearber 26,2002
Page.12
TUALATM VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
ChaimLw,Board of Directors Date
Approved as to Form:
By:
District Counsel
xc i�
9
1 +
t
t
Tigad Urban&-n-ice Agnxmeat -
November 26,21102 '
Page 13
WASHINGTON COUMW
By
Tom Brian,Chair Date
Board of Coonnissioners
Approved as to Fomc
County Com�sd
a�
i
i
r
Tigard Urban Service Ageem.9
November 26,2002'
Page 14
METRO
By:
Presiding OfFW4CV Date
Approved as to Form:
BY-
Legal Counsel
s
r.
C -
i
r
Tigard Urban Service Agre—cat -
Novewber 26,2002
Page IS
EXHIBIT A
PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR FIRE PROTECTION
AND PUBLIC EMERGENCY SERVICES
TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE AND RESCUE DISTRICT,CITY and COUNTY agree:
1. That the TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE AND RESCUE DISTRICT(TVFR)is and shall
continue to be the sole provider of firs protection services to the Tigard Urban Service Area
(TUSA)shown on Map A.
2. That-TVFR,e�and COUNTY are and shall continue to provide emergency management
response services to the TUSA_
3. That TVFR is and shall continue to be the sole provider of all other public emergency
services to the TUSA,excluding law enforcement services.
i
i ;
i .
Tigard Urban Service Agreement
November 26,2002
Page 16
EXHIBIT B
PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE
TRI-MET,CITY,COUNTY and METRO agree:
1. That TRI-MET,pursuant to ORS Chapter 267,is currently the sole provider of public mass
transit to the Tigard Urban Service Area(TUSA)shown on Map A Future optionsfor
public rrrass hmmit services to the TUSA may include public/private partnerships to provide
rail or other transit service,CITY operated transit service,and transit service by one or more
public agency to all or part of the area.
2. That TRI-N&Khall work with the COUNTY,CITY,and METRO to provide efficient and
effective public mass transit services to the TUSA_
i
i
i -
r
t
Tigard Urban Service Agrcernent ..
November 26,2002
Page 17
EXIIISrr C
PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT
COUNTY and CITY agree:
1_ Tate��law �within the Tigard Urban Service Area shown on Map A.yie CITY
enforcement services and the area will be withdrawn from the Enhanced
Sheriff's Patrol District The Sheriffs Office will continue to provide-law enforcement
services identified through the Cogan Law Enforcement Pro'ca and those
by state law.Eventually,the Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District,consistent with rscrviests Mandated
conditions of•;t"ration,will be eliminated.when anneuations on a county wide basis reach a
Point where the function of the District is no longer economicauy feasible_ -
2_ That over time as annexations occur within the urban unincorporated area,the primary focus
of the Sheriff's office will be to provide progratus that are county-wide in
rural areas ofthe COUNTY. The Sheriff's office will continue to nature or serve the maintain needed service
levels and programs to ensure the proper functioning of the justice system in the COUNTY.
The Sheriffs Office will also continue to provide available aid to smaller cities(e-g_,Banks
and Norah Plaine)for services specified in the COUNTY'
request mutual aid agreement with those
cities upon their request The Sheriff's Office will also consider requests to provide law
enforcement services to cities on a contractual
enforcement con basis consistent with the COUNTY'S law
tractinns Policy.
3. That the COUNTY and CITY and other W
Enforcement project,shall determine the uan County cities,through the Cogan Law
ultimate
functions of the Sheriffs Office that are
not mandated by state law.
4. That the COUNTY and CITY shall utilize comparable measures of staffing that accurately
depict the level of service being provided to residents of all local jurisdictions in the
COUNTY.
i
i
i
i -
r.
i
Tigard Urban Service Agreemern
Novenber 26,2002
Page is
EXIIIRIT D
PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR PARKS,RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
CITY,TUALATIN HILLS PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT(THPRD),COUNTY,and
METRO agree:
1. That the CITY shall be the designated provider of park,recreation and open spaces services
to the Tigard Urban Service Area(TUSA)shown on Map A. Actual provision of these
services by the CITY to[ands within the TUSA is dependent upon lands being annexed to
the CITY_ W' the Metzger Park Local Improvement District(LID),the CITY will be a
joint provid2 services. The CITY and THPRD,however,may also enter into inter-
governmerrtal agreements for the provision of park,recreation and open space services to
residents within each other'boundaries,such as the joint use of facilities or programs.This
provision does not preclude future amendments to this AGREEMENT cottceming how park,
recreation and open space services may be provided within the TUSA.
2. That the CITY and the COUNTY should further examine the feasibility of creating a park
and recreation district for the TUSA_
3. That standards for park,recreation,and open space services within the TUSA wilt be as
described in the CITY S park master plan.
4. That the CITY and COUNTY are supportive of the concept of a patios systems development
charge as a method for the future acquisition and development of parks lands in the TUSA
that are outside of the CITY. The CITY and COUNTY agree to study the feasibility of
adopting such a systems development charge for lands outside of the CITY.
5. That at the next update of its parks master plan,the CITY shall address all the lands within
the TUSA.
6. That the Metzger Park LID shall remain as a special purpose park provider for as long as a
majority of property owners within the LID wish to continue to pay annual levies for the
operation and maintenance of Metzger Park. The CITY and COUNTY also agree to the
continuation of the Metzger Park Advisory Board. However,the COUNTY as administrator
of the LID,may consider contracting operation and maintenance services to another provider
if that option proves to be more efficient and cost-effective. This option would be presented
and discussed with the Park Advisory Board before the COUNTY makes a decision.
1
j - 7_ That continuation of the Metzger Park LID shall not impede provision of parks,and
eventually recreation services,to the Metzger Park neighborhood by the CITY_ Continuation
of the Metzger Park LID will be considered as providing an additional level of service to the
neighborhood above and beyond that provided by the CITY.
Tigard Udxm Service Agreement
November 26,2002
Page 19
8. I'm the cTTY aw COUNTY will coordinate with Metro to investigate funding sources For
acquisition and trrarragemeat of panics which serve a regional function.
9. That Mho may own and be the provider of region-wide parks,recreation and open space .
facilities within the TUS - Metro Greenspaces and Pars facilities typically are to serve a
bm®der population base than services proaided to residents of the TUSA by the cITY.
Whero applicable,the CITY.COUNTY,and METRO will aspire to coordinate facility
development management and services.
i
i
i
i
Tigard-Urban Service A9r11ment
November 26,200
Page�
EXHIBIT E
PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR ROADS AND STREETS
CrIT and COUNTY agree:
1. Existing Conditions and Agreements
A. The COUNTY shall continue to retain jurisdiction over the network of aderiaLs and
collectoTs l'thin the Tigard Urban Service Area(TUSA)that are specified on the
COUNI`Yivide roadway system in the Washington County Transportation Plan_ The
C1T'Y shall accept responsibility for public sheets,local streets,neighborhood routes and
collectors and other streets and roads that are not part of the COUNTY-wide road system
within its boundaries upon annexation ifthe street or road meets the agreed upon
standards described in Section 2.0-(2)below.
B. The COUNTY and CITY agree to continue sharing equipment and services with
renewed emphasis on tracking of traded services and sharing of equipment without
resorting to a billing system,and improved scheduling of services_ Additionally,the
COUNTY and CITY shall work to improve coordination between the jurisdictions so
that the sharing of equipment and services is not dependent on specific individuals
within each jurisdiction_ The COUNTY and CITY shall also work to establish a more
uniform accounting system to track the sharing and provision of services.
C. Upon annexation to the CITY,the annexed area shall be automatically withdrawn from
the Urban Road Maintenance District(URMD).,
D_ Upon annexation to the CITY,an annexed area that is part of the Washington County
Service District For Street Lighting No.I shall be automatically withdrawn from the
District_ The CITY shall assume responsibility for street lighting on the effective date of
annexation of public streets and COUNTY streets and roads that will be transferred to
the CITY. The COUNTY shall inform PGE when there is a change in road jurisdiction
or when annexation occurs and the annexed area is no longer a part ofthe street lighting
j
district-
2.
istrict2. Road Transfers
1
1 Transfer of jurisdiction nay be initiated by a request from the CITY or the COUN'T'Y_
t
t
A. Road transfers shall include the entire right-of-way(e.gy a boundary cannot be set down
the middle of a road)and proceed in a logical manner that prevents the creation of
segments ofCOUNTY roads within the CITY'S boundaries_
-- Tigard Urban Service Agreement -
November 26,2002
Page 21
B- Within thirtydays ofannexation,the CrrYwift initiate the process to transfer
jurisdiction of COUNTY and public sannexed including
trcets and roads within the area,
local sureets,neighborhood routes,collectors and other roads that are not of county-wide
significance.The transfer of roads should take no more than one year from the effective
date of annexation.
C- Tim COUNTY_
(1)To facilitate the road transfer process,the COUNTY will prepare the exhibits that
document the location and condition ofstreets to be transferred upon receipt of a
transfer request from the CrrY.
(2)Prior to final transfer,the COUNTY.
49AV,
(a) Shall coinplete any maintenance or improvement projects that have been planned
for the ctrrrent fiscal year or transfer funds for same to the CTTY_
(b) Shall provide-the CITY with any information it may have about any
neighborhood oe other concerns about sheets or other traffic issues within the
annexed arca. This may be done by providing copies of COUNTY
I other doctrrrrents or project files
through joint meetings of CITY and.COUNTY staff
members:
(c) Shall make needed roadway improvements so that all individual roads or streets
within the area to be annexed have a pavement condition index(pen of more
than 40 and so that the average PCI of streets and roads in the annexed area is 75
Of higher. As an alternative to COUNTY-made improvements,the COUNTY
may pay the CITY'S costs to make the necessary improvements_
(d) Shall inform the Cri-Y of existing maintenance agreements,Local Improvement
Districts established for road maintenance purposes,and of plans for
mainteriance oFtransfecred roads.The COUNTY shall withdraw the affected
territory from any road maintenance LIbs formed by the COUNTY.
D The CITY.
(1) Agrees to accept all COUNTY roads and streets as defined by ORS 368.001(1)and
all public roads within the annexed area that are-not of county-wide significance or
arc not identified in the COUNTY'S Transportation plan as part of the county-wide
road system provided the average PCI of all COUNTY and public roads and streets
j that the CrrY is to accept in the annexed area is 75 or higher as defined by the
I COUNTY'S pavement management syste— If any individual COUPITy or public
sheet or road that the CrTY is to accept within the area has an average PCI of 40 or
t less at the time of annexation,the Crry shall assume jurisdiction of the road or
sheet ogly.after Ore COUNTY has complied wjth Section 2_C.(2)of at s exhibit
(2) Shap,in the event the transfer of mads does not occur soon after annexation inform
the newly annexed residents of this fact and describe when and under what
Tigard Urban service Agreconent
November 26,2002
- Page 22
conditions the transfer will occur and how maintenance will be provided until the
transfer is complete.
E. The CITY shall be responsible for the operation,maintenance and construction of roads
and streets transferred to the CITY as well as public shcets annexed into the CffY.
CITY road standards shall be applicable to transferred and annexed streets. The CITY
shall also be responsible for the issuance of access permits and other permits to work
within the right-of-way of those streets_
3. Road Design Standards and Review Procedures and Storm Drainage
The CITY and COUNTY shall agree on:
A The C[T'Y?and COUNTY urban road standards and Clean Water Service standards that
will be applicable to the construction of new streets and roads and for improvements to
existing streets and roads that eventually are to be transferred to the CITY,and streets
and roads to be transferred from the CITY to the COUNTY;
B_-The development review process and development review standards for COUNTY and
public streets and roads within the TUSA,including COUNTY streets and roads and
public streets that will become CITY sheets,and streets and roads that are or"I
become part of the COUNTY-wide road system;and
C. Maintenance responsibility for the storm drainage on COUNTY streets and roads within
the TUSA in cooperation with Clean Water Services.
4. Review of Development Applications and Plan Amendments
A. The COUNTY and CITY,in conjunction with other Washington County cities and the
Oregon Department of Transportation(ODOT),shall agree on a process(es)and review
criteria(e.g.,types and levels of analysis)to analyze and condition development
applications and plan amendments for impacts to COUNTY and state roads_
B. The review process(es),review criteria,and criteria to condition development and plan
amendment applications shall be consistent with the Oregon Highway Plan,the Regional
Transportation System:Plan,COUNTY and CITY Transportation Plans and Title 6 of
METRO'S Urban Growth Management Functional Plan_
5_ Maintenance Cooperation
9 }
A: The COUNTY and CITY,in conjunction with ODOT,shall consider developing an
Urban Road Maintenance Agreement within the TUSA area for the maintenance of
COUNTY,C1717Y,and state facilities,such as separately owned sections of arterial
streets and to supplement the 1984 League of Oregon Cities Policy regarding traffic
lights.
'Tigard Urban'Service Agreement
November 26,2002
Page n
A. The COUNTY and CITY,in conjIction with other was
develop a set of minimum right-0f--way maintenance s n County ciders,shall
used in perfannance ofservices provided ander the exp and teveis of activity to be
described above in 5.a age ofservices agreanent
C 'The COUNTY may contract with the.CITY for the maintenance of COUNTY streets and
roads within the TUBA utilizi x an agreed upon billing System
b. The COUNTY.CITY and ODOT,in conjunction with other Washington County cities,
will study opportunities for co-locating maintenance facilities.
6. hnplementagi .
Within year of the effective date of this AGgfiEto lvlhpn;the CITY and COUNTY agree
implemented.develop a schedule that describes when the provisions of this exhibit shall be
C
7
i
Tigard.Udm Sevvice Agreement
November'-26,2002
'age 24 -
A. The COUNTY and CITY,in conjunction with other Washington County cities,shall
develop a set of minimum right-of-way maintenance standards and levels of activity to be
used in performance of services provided under the exchange of services agreement
described above in S.a.
C.'The COUNTY may oantract with the.CITY for the maintenance of COUNTY street,.and
roads within the TUSA utHi ing an agreed upon billing system
D. The COUNTY,Crr'Y and ODOT,in conjunction with other Washington County cities,
will study opportunities for co-locating maintenance facilities.
6- Irnplementatign s
�r
Within one year ofthe effective date of this AGREEMENT,the CITY and COUNTY agree
to develop a schedule that describes when the provisions of this exhibit shall be
implemented
7
9
i -
t
Tigard Ud-Sconce Agreement
November-26.2M
Page 24
EXHIBIT F
PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER
AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
CLEAN WATER SERVICES,(CWS),CITY and COUNTY agree:
1. As a county service.district organized under ORS 451,CWS has the legal authority for the
sanitary sewage and storm water(surface water)management within the CITY and the urban
unincorporated area. CWS develops standards and work programs,is the permit holder,and
operates the Mary sewage treatment plants.
2. The CITY performs a portion of the local sanitary sewer and'storm water management
programs as defined in the operating agreement between the CITY and CWS. This
agreement shall be modified on an as-needed basis by entities to the agreement
3. At the time of this AGREEMENT,the following are specific issues that the parties have
addressed as part of this process and agree to resolve through changes to current
intergovernmental agreements_. "
A_ Rehabilitation of Sewer Lines with Basins Identified with High Levels of Infiltration and
Inflow(I&I).
B. For tines that are cost-effective to do rehabilitation,CWS and the CITY will consider
'cost-sharing regardless of line size under a formula and using fund sources to be agreed
on between CITY and CWS.The cost-share is to be determined through specific project
intergovernmental agreements. Following the evaluation of program funding methods,
CWS,in cooperation with the CITY,will determine the long-term funding for I&I and
other rehabilitation projects.
C. CWS,with assistance from the CITY and other Washington County cities,shalt
undertake periodic rate studies of monthly service charges to determine whether they are
adequate to cover costs,including costs of maintenance and rehabilitation ofsewer lines_
The rate study shall consider sewer line deterioration and related maintenance and repair
issues.
i
4. Master and Watershed Planning:
i
jA_ Primary responsibility for master and watershed planning will remain with CWS,but the
CITY will be permitted to conduct such planning as long as these plans meet CWS
standards- CWS and the CITY shalt use uniform standards,such as computer modeling,
to conduct these studies. CWS and the CITY shall determine their respective cost-
sharing responsibility for conducting these studies.
Tigard Urban Service,Agreement
November26,2002
Page 25
B. CWS and the CITY,in conjunction with other Washington County cities using the
City/District Committee established by CWS,shall develop uniform procedures for the
coordination and participation between CWS,the CITY and other cities when doing
mastwand watershed platming..
5: Sanitary Sewer Systems Development Charges
CWS and the CITY,in conjunction with other Washington County cities,shall use the
results of the CWS Conveyance System Management Study,or updates,for options for
collection and expenditure of SDC funds to address current disparities between where funds
are collected and where needs aro for projects based on an agreed upon CrrY/CWS master
ply
i
t<rt�s
6. Storm Water d1 nagementSystem Development Charges
A CWS and the CITY shall use the results of the CWS Surface Water Management Plan
Update Project to address all aspects of storm water management and to provide more
direction to CWS and the CITY.
B. Watershed plans being prepared by CWS for storm water management shall address the
major collection system as well as the open-channel system to identify projects for
funding.
7. Maintenance
CWS,in cooperation with the CITY and other Washington County cities,shall use the
resuhv of the CWS Conveyance System Management Study for guidance to resolve issues
reiated to roles.of the DISTRICT and the cities in order to provide more cost effective
maintenance of the collection systems.
1
i
1
t
1
Tigard Urban Service Agcxmatt
November 26.'2002
Page 26 _ _
EXHIBIT G
PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT FOR WATER SERVICE
TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT("TV WD),TIGARD WATER DISTRICT(TWD),
CITY and COUNTY agree:
L Supply-
A. Supply generally Will not impact service boundaries,given that a limited number of
sources pro,ide all the water in the study area and the number of interconnections
between providers are increasing and are encouraged to continue in the future.
B. Future supply and conservation issues may be addressed through the Regional Water
Consortium to the extent reasonable and practicable for water providers in Washington
County. Service providers in the TUSA shall continue to participate in the Consortium
and use it as the forum for raising,discussing and addressing supply issues.
C. The Consortium may also serve as a forum to discuss and resolve water political issues
to the extent reasonable and piacticable for water providers in Washington County. The
Consortium is an appropriate forum to bring elected officials together and for promoting
more efficient worldrig relationships on water supply and conservation issues.
D. Intergovernmental agreements shall address ownership of interconnections between
r ITY and Districts'sources,whether for the purpose of wholesale provision of water
from one entity to the other or for emergency use,in the case of a boundary change that
involves the site of the interconnection_
2. Maintenance/Distribntion:
A. TV WD,TWD and the CITY do not anticipate any events in the foreseeable future that
would necessitate maintenance,rehabilitation or replacement beyond the financial reach
.of any of the water providers in the TUSA. Each provider will continue to be
responsible for providing the financial revenue stream through rates and charges and to
accrue adequate reserves to meet foreseeable major maintenance needs.
B. TV WD,TWD,CITY,and COUNTY agree to maintain and participate in the
Cooperative Public Agencies of Washington County in order to efficiently share and
exchange equipment and services_
C. To the extent reasonable and practicable,TV wD,TWD and the CITY shall coordinate
mandated(under Oregon law)underground utility locating services to efficiently provide
service within the urban service areas.
D. TVWD,TWD and CITY agree to provide to one another copies ofas-builts ofexisting
and new facilities and other types of water system maps for the purposes of facilitating
Tigard Urban Service Agreement
November 26,2002
Page 27
planning,engineering and design of other utilities or structures that may connect,
intersect or be built in proximity to CrrY facilities. The CITY agrees to incorporate
such mapping into its GIS mapping system of utilities and other facilities. TV WiD.TwD
and CITY agree to develop and maintain a common,on-going,up to date GLS mapping
system showing facilities of each water provider within the TUSA.
3. Customer Service/Water Rates:
A. Price of supply and bonded indebtedness will most likely have the greatest impact on
rates.
B. TV WD,TWD,and the CITY believe that rates are equitable within the TUSA.
C. Given a4r ate water pressure.level and quality of service should not
vary significantly
among different water providers in the TUSA and does not appear to be an issues for most
customers.
4. WethdrawaVAnnexation/Merger
A. Notwithstanding Section I of this AGREEMENT-Roles and Responsibilities,or
existing agreements between the providers,future annexations may lead to changes in
service provision arrangements. Modifications to any service area boundary shall
comply with METRO Code Chapter 3.09 and provisions identified under Section JV. If
necessary,the Metro Boundary Appeals process shall be employed to resolve conflicts
between parties as they arise.TV WD,TWD,and the CITY shall continue to work
together to adjust boundaries as appropriate to improve the cost-effectiveness and
.efficiency of providing service. ..
B. In the event that the entire service area of any DISTRICT is annexed in the future,that
district shall be dissolved.No attempt shall be made to maintain the district by delaying
annexation of a token portion of the district(e.g.,the district office):
C. The area of TV WD known as the Metzger service area shall remain in TV WD,except
those portions agreed to by both TV WD and CrrY that may be withdrawn from T V WD
upon annexation to the CITY. in exchange,TVVM will support the CITY joining as a
partner of the Joint Water Commission;
D. Providers that propose a merger,major annexation or dissolution shall give all providers
in the study area an opportunity to influence the decision as well as plan for the
i consecquences. None of the parties waives its right to contest a major or ruinor boundary
change by any of the other parties on the issue of the appropriate service provider for the
area encompassed by the boundary change except when the party has expressly waived
that right as to a described service area in an agreement executed subsequent to this
agtc-t--
Sb122�,Ti;ud USA%rn=I Aaom.mr 11 2642 SDC
' Tigard Urban Service Agreement
November 26,2002
Page 29
It Wi§ k��a 1 �'L„k.! 4r ftp. r .f �;S■K� n.�1ti��{ ^;n��
g
a gr ,
czar
— (�
a F cz,>�- 'a'(:✓ j`+-� :'9eT�y=1a�� d���H°-_T3
CK
L -_ :y`•Lali�
i' i!
tj
ji-
}.ptrL
! ( 1.
MIN-
sm
4}�
aim
am
-r: r'x
w�I�"�,1�3s�-,
il
44
Avg
W,All
1 NJ
�.
C
O
��TIGARDURBj� APPENDIX D,(Signed)
.AN SERVICE AGREEMENT
Novejuirer 26r 2oo2
IVU AGRUMUN 'ismadoandCuedintobyandbetvm aWashigtonCaoaty a juxdevw
aommatim of tho Shoe oaf Ocegog hie. a COUNTY,"tho GYy olmvaid,a
nnuacwa
corporation ofthe State GfOse®oo,bmnwaftc-cnY,-m tro,a metiopoUanservia datriet of
����go4 `�lIiO,-and the fi�IIovdng Sly Districts of the Stats of
`D1STRI(mS),-
Clean wattr Servipw
;���ardwatecDistrict; - -
mwatim
"Ns Park and Recreation Djsftc
Tirol VaNeyF-and Rescue Dim and
T-latn VaNey WarmDishict
REC=Ars
WHERE ,Ops 1-95-0250)m1piFes METRO.an-,&its zesiclual 000rffimit oa
to teview urban service agcy-a�
1Gog land�i Y> adiviGes of d
specal&sh etay state a4mcies,and '
V HREAS,ORS I95A20({X0 -quiz-C-v-t- to specify the units of tocat
govQ rntwbich shat!be parties to an uit-sorvico 29—cmt under ORS 195.065;and_
SEAS,MS 195.065(1)ror;ruacs quits a£local gov=rmw t thatpmvide an urbansecvicc
-khiu an uubap Wowdi boonda[y to eller iaoo as urban st vim ageoaneutthat speca5es the omit of
govemmautlaab will deg-the savn_, sets im*dr functional colo of each savioe g ovidc=
d the firture setvieearLa aid assigns poo es Sosplannro8 and 000hdinmtian of
savican and
WHBZ2Eks.ORS 195.065(1)and(2)r-PAe that the COUMV sbali be respaasibtc fix:
1. Conveoivg-Pr-*;ativw of all cities and spe W districts that provide or declare an intemst is
C providing an Urban service inside anorbau growth boundary within the county that has a
7 , P0PulafiQuV=&wthm2,300personsfortbepnrposeoEagotiatinganurban servioc
2 ith y plmlihhg osWmamtions within the area a$eeted by Ilm
h 3. NodfyiiMAtcuoffiadvaooeof
Metro's ieviehr and urban service age to enable
T%-d Uxb-Service Agnxmenr "
Novfanber 26,2002
Page l
WIHtEAS,ORS 195.075(1)squires urban service ngrcanats to provide fur the of
an adequate level of urban services to the entire area that each provides saves and to specify if
there is a sismi5caoat rodudian in the tenAmy ofa special service district and
WHEREAS.ORS 195.075(1)reports that if dgxc is 1<sigmbgd rednctlm in territory,the
aggeema8 shall specify how the remaining;portion orate district is to receive services in as
affardab1c;man—.and
WHEIZEAS.QRS 195205 TO 195535 grant authority to does and districts(as defmod by ORS
198.0110)to anooc lands veifhirh az urban,growth 6ouodary,subject'to voter approval,if Ora city or
district enacts as amrxatiun plan adopted pucs.rant to ORS 195.020 195.060 to 195.095,
195.145 to 195.235,197.005,197319,19732o,197335,and 223304,and i[the city or district
has atered service agroBQhmts with the cry,cities and special&-ft cts which
provide urban=I;,icas within the a$ocbod area;and
WAEREAS,ORS 197.175 rogto.cities and counties to prepaM adopt,amen,and revise their
comptchansive plain in.congdiance with statewide pfannin8 goals,and toad land use regulations
to impleirienc their wive plans;and
VVIUMEAS,Statewide Planning Goals 2,11,and 14 require cities and cormfies to para,in
eoopeaatlon with all affected agencies and special districts, the urbaoization of Lands within an
urban giowth.boundary,and erre the timely,orderly,and efficient emersion ofpabfrc facilities
and urban sesvroes.
PLOW,TE]EREFORE,the premises being in general as stated in the foregoing renals,it is agreed
by and between the parties hereto as follows:
L .ROLES AND RESPONSI$ff rrlES
A. Parties to this AG1i1V T shaU provido land use planning no ice to each otherin
accordance with the prevision ofthe"Cooperative Agroemeats,"developed per ORS
195.020(4)(e).
B. The parties to this AGREEbliEN1'are designated as the appropriate provider of services to
the citiaens residing with their boundaries as specified in this AGREEMEbIT
C. Tim CITY is designated as the appropriate provider ofsemces to cRrneris residing within
r its bound—and to adlaoc of wr c orporated areas mbject to this AGREEMENT as
q drown oa blap A,accept for those services that are to be provided by another party as
specified is this AGREEMENT.
5
p' D_ The CITY and COUNTY will be supportive of annexations to the CITY overtime- The
u CITY shall endeavor to annex the unincorporated areas shown on Map lay in kcxping with
the frrllovving sc>w4d,v
1. Near to mid;ems(3 to 5 years):.Boli Mountain area and unincorporated lands north
ofthc Tualatin River and south ofD ham Road and
Tigard Urban Service Apecuiciat
Wavember-26,2002
Pam 2
2. Fa-tem(10 years oelater-)L Agetteet area.
$ AnamPt to ORS 195.205,the CITY and DISTRICTS nseave the e,&and may,
s�bsequattothecuac6mcotofddsAGREE OWT d-119pan anacaafine plmcwpbmsm
ftfiaOe Wis AGRE MMENT in accor4low with ORS 195.205 to 220.
F Ta 1zePiu;vviBr the C4wsiy 2D0o Sb-mgicP/ays or its su=aesso,the COUNTY.WM fens
its eaatgies an dxm serviocs that provide eoanty-vide benefit and trueaifim oat of
P-Viam moarapal seavrees that may benefit specific,geographic areas or drsb cts_ The+
COUNTY secogaizes cities and special service&&Mets as dw ark mpfe mu cq ai service
Providers-specified in oris AGR EE&m`Tf. The CO;TNIY also moog secs does as the
ulrnnat.local R.M.provider to the urban area
0. Within months ofthe c$tcdm date ofthis AGRFEKWN'T and prior to any
e>vosandation ortsaasfer ofduties or any single or mope amtiacatiom totaling tvvratiy.
neer$,the pa.tiesaha0 idntlify.any duties pad4--d by the parties that vmQ or may be
aarm+od or baasfermd from one party to ano0rrparty by amoration,consohdationAw
agree next. no affected parties shall identify how the duties well be trausfened or
assma od.-clu ft the transfer 9f erngioyees altd equips The process to transfer .
duties.c-ployces and egmpment shall a000rmt for the wavnla m egeeft pfanaearatiooy
consolidation and transfix by age-cement.!us process shall also address large state '
anneacadow and the IaW scale transfor ofdtzd-by consolidation or affeem.LTithe
cvcm the affected parties c Bout agree upon the processes to transfc*r duties employees
and the PFOvisicm of Section VII of thus AGRE3avIENT$fall be used to
resolve the digx b-'
IL The COUNTY stall have the ibi y For couveubw IP+-cut3tivcs for the purpose .
Pfa—adiegthbAGREEM>Nt;pursaaottoOXS 195_065(2xa).
IL AG I COORDWAT'ION
A I agreements that are aamslc t with this AGREIWTPT
shall remain in force_ TVm AGREEhIEWshan control provisions ofcdsting
aaRrgovrnmmmtal agraeme�s that am with Bre trans ofthis -
AGRFI�Nffi1T.11sis.AGR]a3h ;NTdoesndprocladeany party from'avacoxfimgas
c-ds.�iacv-g l agrcemeat or catering into a neva hkt r_govcued
L agrormret with cae or rare parties for a service,addressed in this AGREEAWNT,
C Provided sueh-agr cearot is with dc provisions ofthis AGREEMENT-
B- The QTY and COUNTY have entered into an ifagovemmedal agrecroWt for the
CITY provmm of buHdvP land developmerrt and specific road services or behalf of
the COUNTY to Ore unincorporate lands mthe Bali Moun aim area_
C_ CITY and COUNTY shall endeavor totaTaanaction
necessary toeaasetheir
Pimm to be aurtended to be consistent with this AGR1EbmNT witwm-
tvvc ve munIhs of c ccutinn of this AGREEMO iT,bac no laocr*an sbdw,rmmths
fivm Ow date ofexewtion_
- Tigard Urban Service A$rcemwt _ -
2'Tovdmber2ti;2002 .
PaW 3
IM AREA AFFECTED BY AGR KFJAENT
]his AGREEMENT applies to the Tigard u flan Service Area CMSA)as shown on Map
A=0 properties added to The Regional thban O&owm Boundary(U(M)that arc to be
am=cdd to the CITY in Bio faaac as described below m Section VIQ_
IV. URBAN SERVICE PROVIDERS
'A'The service provisions of this AGREEM EZJT,as deseubed in Exhibits A through O,
establish the providers and elements of utban services for the geographic area covered
-in this AGRF1's11/E121T;and
B. 119�9IIowing urban serm=arc addressed inthis AGREEMENT_
1. line Protection and Finagc.W Services(Exhibit A);
2 Public Transit(Exhibit B);
'3- Law Enfoeoement(Exhibit Q;
4- Padcs,Recreation,and Open Space(Exhibit D);
S. Roads and Streets(F.AnW E);
6- Sanitary_ Sewer and Stoma Water(Exhibit,F);and
7_ Water Service_(Exlubit G).
V_ ASSIGNABELMY
Noa-i maent ofaayparty's rights oroblgations naderthss AGREEMENTto a
diffemat new or ea Edatod or merged C-ty shall be edfbcfive without the prior wnseat
ofd w other parties affected ihemby.Any party to this.AGREEMQTT who pmpcses a
famatim;merge,consolidatiorS diissolutiog or odwr major boundary change shall notify
all dherpartm ofthe atiailability of the reports or studies rewind by Oregon State
Statutes to be pregaredas part ofthe proposal
VL EFFECTIVE DATE OF AGRERMNT
This AGREENMENT shaH become eve upon full execubon by all parties-
VIL TERM OF THE AGNE]MMENT
This AGREEMENT shall roue to be m aff lct as king as rcwhed under state law_The
a COUNTYshaU be responsible for convening the parties to this AGREEMM rr for the
review ormodifi modification ofthis AGRMIMr.
l pursuant to Bodian Vffi. -
t •
t - .
Tigard Udm Servke Agreement
Novembcr26,2002
Page 4
VIII_ PROCESS FOR REVIEW AND MOI)IFICATTON OF T EW AGREE&OKNT
A. Pattie s§-B PAY rpvkw rho Pmvisious of Ibis AOREEOP iuander to
evahrato�e e�octivemmrss tmfthe lxoasses snot forth berm and to prnpom any
Dec-sar7-beneficial amdendmmft to address considarawas of ORS 195_D7o and
ORS 195.075-
B- Any par1Y uurY p modificatims to this agmeeniatt to addmss comms o,
dm,gr.s in circmustances.
G The body ofthis AGREbv)$IT(Recitals and Sections I through ixj may 4=dy be
Sed by vnium oaosea of an affected par im.Amadments to the edits of this
AGREIP6WNT may be made upomwrittea consent ofthe parties ideadEjed m each
D. Tho pmmlic,rcyww ofthis AGREIMCEN r and all pvWosod modifigtious to this
AGREEMENT shall be coordinated by the COUNTY_An requests for the periodc
review of this AGRETiMEW and all proposed modifications shall be cogsi d in a
timclymaaoer and allpartia sball xeoeivz notioe of any proposed amondummt, Only
tlxosepartus affa3od by an amaidment-ball sign the,eroded agreement_ All
mnmdmegft that mdudc bomWary changes-ball coaply with Chapter 3_09 ofthe
METRO Code or its soocessor_
8 Lands added to tho Regional Urban Growth Boondaty that are determined to be
annexed to the CrlY in the fidum by separate process,such an Urban iteserve Plan
shall be subjectto ibis AGREEMENT- 11-appropriate,service providers to new
urban}acids Ser ffie services addrased'm this AGRFJ24 T shall be determined
through the:provisions of this SecdwnugJess those ddemi mbm arc made through
the dcvclopment ofan Urban Reserve Plan and all affedid parties agree to the savwc
dd—imatioos_ This AGREEMENT shall be amendcdto address new urban lands
andicBed theserviceproviderd aRicescrosistmtwithtbeptovWm=,£this
Scc&oa
TIC. DISPUTE RPSOLU nON.
lfa&Vm to axisc:between.or among the parties regarding breach ofthis AGREkMiW
W WftBr'I3hm ofmy terra&mcog thosc parties shall first attempt to resolve;the dispute
by negotiation priot to any other contested'case process.Ifnegotiration far7s to=Soho the
bisput,the parties agree to submit the macer to non-bift mediat o, Only,8ft fi.
steps have been exhausted will the matter be submitted to arbAmaom
i
- Step 1—Ncdo4atioo_ 'The manages�other persons deed byoeh oftEre drspotiag
parties wM negotiate oa behalf of&o entities they npresemt.The Issues of the crtisp ft
shall be xednoed to wxitmg and each v anagen shall then mod and aucenpt to resolve Me
issue Ifthe dispute is resolved with this step,dam shall be a written ddauaxin2din of
such resolution signed by each manager,which shall be biufimg upon the parties-
- Tigard UrbanServiceAgement
_ ttovember2l..9002 .
Step 2—Modiadoo.Wam&gmft iamnot be resolvcd vrithin 30 days of indiiatim gfSV
party sbaR request in wrifing that the roamer be zuba&W to aoa4,md r g
Tbo Panics Shan uwgoo"k tJF cwmb to aa=m a modiaw If ttmyi eaitnot rCC6�the
Parties sbA request a list of fives nwdiators ticmm an eddy- firm proyj�ma d
services Yho'pdrtics vm attest to any agree an a mediaoar(tour the&st prvvidcd
tent if tbcy cannot ager,ead+Party shad Seiact one us=and dm two mediators sban
1o'"ly adoct a th d mocl atoc 'fha A-M be hand by the thuid nxhzw and my
oammon costs ofnxxrm im shall be bdrbb equany by the parties,.who Zh*p calch bear 1Ldr
oivn oasts Sad Errs therefore. if the issue is msalvcd at this Stop tba.a a vnittm
deaaminatiaa of such resobdioa shah be signed by each managar and shall be binding
Open the parties.
Step 3*#zbitrafian.After exhaustion ofSteps I and 2 above;,the matter slug he settled
by bir"adwtcat—In waA_gtna Cauin man
oty,Ovcgo% e with the Coww=W
iftatim Rales of the Au-ieam Arbdratiun A--iwio%the
Smvioe cf Pcxft-d,—any ad—rales rules o ORflm 190 7l on
The arbftrmtkft shat!be before a single arbitrator, tg P to ORS I9=fi0 90.
umdm ny selecting an arbat-.dor or Sons not par orftw the p and firm
agrrarg rgron hrbidratim rules and fheres.T ho is not pari:afitie AAA be shared
and
piox�rres.The nose ofarbitrafion steal[be shared
egnaIly.Tho arbiaakou sbali beheld witWm 60 days ofsej=don ofthe arbitrator nntess
odwrvvrsc agreed to by the parties. The da-idou shaft be issued within 6o days of
ad3i ration.
X SEtrERABILrrY CLAUSE
Wany poWw.ofthis ACAW1 A Ht4T is dared kvafid.ar fioDa by a court of
aoO.tpdcat jurisdidim,such podium shall be dermed a separate,4yt*dmct,and indela mlod
Provision and such boldmg sball Oct affect the validity ofdm rttuafi ing P0rfions of this
AGRURUIENT.
XI_ SIGNATURES OF PARTIES TO AGP"bf 'C
In witness whereof this AGRERW'NT is executed by the mdhodmod rcpvescjnivesof
( ibo COUNTY,CrlY,DISTRICTS,and METRO.The parties,by the represmtafive's
manadaes to this AGREUvM ),signify that each has read the AGREEME24l;
wands its isms,and agrees to be bound thereby
is -
1,:
t € -
'rmwd Urbain Ser—Agew=a
I'loraober2f 2002
Pa&e 6 .
8.G" 17ube
wpprbwdastoFbmx .
Sri
rukbaaQ.;a
NWMAW26.200
PjW7
T(TAT.ATM VALLEY FIRE AND RESCUE DISTRICT
BY�G�
. � o�ax.B�f cWcs D4 ���7�0� r
AgSworcd as to Foam
-
ftgcs
TQALAYIId HUS PARK AND RECREAMIt D=MCr
�Pietidcar Fr Yl,aV";f ?llt3a
Dwe
1D Foy I
Dishict '
- mud iTi60nSayjpp
_ I'Tov�abtd26y,�pp2 _
Date
Aeras$*F
-
C -
3
6 -
WSwdUsbaaSavioe-A t
xo�u;ears -
to
CLi+W WA7EK SERVICES
BacfAtoctars Daft
Appwvcd as mo FFonw r/ AMC-=csaFlry��
x�xoea.e��t�oo?-119-
nisbia CC� °+as---- 7-oa
NOVCMbCV -
26.200�
Pago11
'IIGAItD WATM DISMCP
Board ofaucc c.s Daft
AppsovedAswFoam
District Couosd
1
1 .
1
r
MZwd Aibam Smviw AgQca�t
WovcmA t 2¢6 Z0-U
Plqp 12
"vu.w- NVAtIEs WATMc JE)LSmCT
BmldofD;soun Daft
83ehard P! Burke
APpvr/odias to F.CN=
Cl$lrk Balfour
1 ,
1
1 -
1 - -
_ .. Tigud Urban Sav7oe
NoxaahQ26f.20t/2 _
'Yaffe]&
WASHE4GT0N CCK"gW
Tom Bdao,Q base
Bond of C
Approved as to Fames APPROVEu WASMNCTON COUMT
BOARD OF CObodiSS101; SS
14TNUTE ORDER f
CQmcy Coaose� DATE
RZ
coat a oawo
mgwd Ud%m s=V W*AVV=3cat
Ho"=ber 26,2002
l*ot 14
amnrRomoo^✓�
O orr Data1 131
App-vad as to Form
- iicga7(:uun9d
T�dIIrbaaSuviacA�ep�t _
' Nuoe®bg7b,2002 -
�ss
EXHIBIT A
PItOVLStONS OF AGREEMENT FOR FIRE PROTECIION
AND PUBLIC EMERGENCY SERVICES'
I UALAMN VALLEY FW E AND RESCUE Df&MCI;Crry ma COUNTYagmr,
L Thatthe TIALATIN VALLEY FIRE AND RESCUE DIS I'RICr(rVFR)is�d shall
cant we to be the sole pmv-kr Of Ste PVa=tKm=V-=to tbo Tigard Dibm Serv=Arca
(TIS A)shown on Map A-
2- IltatTVArCnYsndCOIJNrY3xc and sbali ountmnc to 1de87!manageragm
respo¢ve services to tLe TUSA
3. That TVFR is and staff care to be the sole provider ofall other Public emergcacy services
to the TUSH,cxchuding law amRwcemea services.
w
1
1 _
t -
r -
7y6WdUfbMSan7ceAgmwwnt
Novemb x26,2002
Page l6
• STT B -
PROVWONS OF AGREFASENT FOR PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE
MUAWT,Crrlr COUNTY and MMMO age
I_ 41st MU-I.Wr,purs=antfio ORS Oa 267,is atly de pw solWW=of�pobtic mass
Uan it to the T -d Urban S � m+m
rsv➢cc Area(TUSA)Axmq as M-ap A. Fu4m Worcs for public
mass lransd smvit=to the 4USA may inrlade pubNz4 ivaft prarhmmbips to proo c rail or
other ttamsit=nice,Crrir cpaakd'i --savior aai Uaositsaviceby ane or more public
a$taty to all or pad offfie arei
2. That TRI-14I&shall want with the COUNTY CITY,aad I14FiTR0 m pruvidc and
eve pablic mass fraasit services/n the TjC
1
1
l -
7%ud Uxbak Same Ag[et-
Plovemh=26,2002
,Page 17
FxHmrr C
PROVMONS OF AGREEhWJVr FOR LAW EMMRCEb"Wr
COUNTY and CTTY agrca
L Tbat as occur wkbm the,rgWd Urban Service Area shown On Map A�the CCry
wW as=—law caforcc norr services add The area will be withdrawn firm the Enhanced
Sheriffs Patrol District.The Sheraffs Office will eontimre to provide law mSotcc�nent
sezvroes identified 1Lroagh the Cogan Law F-fi—cmeot Project and thou services mandated
by�1aaF_ venhrally;Me P'phanced ShQif Fs Patrol District, with its couditims
offormati6as?wrll be eGmmaied when mond on a—uuLy-v6&basis read,a point where
the function o£the District is m Imga 00000mieaHy fens le_
2" That over time as ambos owns wither the urban unincorporated area,the Prfinazy focus
ofthe ShcdW:s gffice wiR be to provide prostams that are con ty-wide in naduc x serve the
rural areas of the COUNTY_The Sh—Ws office wdrcottberre to---d-m needed service
levels and programs to omm the P-p-fig Gfthe jrutice sYstem in the COUNTY.
The ShaiWs Ot$ce wdl also eontimm to provide ava&-lbie aid to smaller cities(C.X.Rant.
m dNOdh Plains)for services specified in the COUNTY'S mutual aid agreement with those
sties upon their rcq=L The.Sheraff's Oftice wilt also eomdder requests to provide law
services to cities On a eomxaeeual basis cousisWrt withde COZ.iNTY's law .
erd'oc cement contracting Ply
3_ Thatthe COUNTY and Crrlr and other Washington Cou-y ftwah the Cogan Law
AF forcemmt Project shag dete®ine the ulmoate f m ctims of the Sh.Ws Office that arc not
andated by state law.
4. That the COUNTY and CllYshan utgxm comparable U essnm ofstaffmg that aauratcly
depict the level of service being provided to residents of aR]ureal ju isdctaons in the COUN'tY"
3 -
i
r -
Twmd Urbau Snv=AVmmmt.
Nove�26,20p2.
-. Page I8
- EXHIBIT D
PROVISION$OFACREIDA[E VT FAR PARKS,RECREAMON AND OPEN SPACE /
MY.T UAL&MV fM S PARK AND RL'CREA-lION DISTRICT(1TIPRDI COUNTY and
METRO agree_
1. That the CCCY shall be the desiguatod provader of pals recreation and open spars services to
OW Tigard Urban Service Area{CUBA)shown m Map A Actual prnvs of these se=vias
by the CTCY to}ands within the TUSH is depended upon lauds be=g hexed to the CC1Y.
Within theM�Pad Local District���tlrc CITYvvr7I ba a jomtpmvider
vfsetviee�-�eC1T'YandTHPRl).Loraevix,mayaLsoeutetiatoi:mer-gwetnaa�
agre®ta�ts Sorthe provision ofparFy z<eraeation and open sQa[oe services to residents within
each caret"bo ndaries,such as tha joint use offaciGf=or progr-aws_ This provision does not
Preclude frrtore aomendmeNs to this AGRIREM&T conxsuarg Trow Pa :r�atiau and "
spaoa services may be'pmvsdod withal the TUSA �
2 That the CfCyand the COUNTY should Tither examine the sorsa mty ofd a Park and
rem—lioa district foe the TUSA
3. 11tat 1—Urds fur pa % .—d Up—spaeo services,within thg IWA I-M be as
descubed is the CrMS pads mastw pi-am
4. That the CUYand COUNTY are sappmtive of tbn canocpt of a parlor systems t
ar
charge as a for the fimma acgms oon acid dcvdopmmt ofparis lauds in the TUSA that
t outside of fthc C the Ct1Y The.C1IY and COUNTY agree to studythe ieasibUdy of adopting
such a systems developments outside of the CITY_
S. That at the nmd update of its parks master plaq the MY shat!address aR the lands within
the TUSA
6- That the M Park ImIna shall--aimas;a special purposep arkprovider for as(mg as a
itY_of Pmpertyo"ne s within the 1-r wish to oontimre tO PaY au=ral levies for the
operation and made of hfitzger Padr The C11Y and COUNTY also agrec to the
dation of dw Metrger park Advisory Board Hogvcva,the COUNTY as administrator
orthe Iso may consider contracting operation and maintenance services to another provider if
dud option proves to be more etTica and cost-effafive This option would be presented and
dLvcusmd wdh the NA Advismy Board be6ore tha COUNTY makes a derision.
J _
7. That oaoiiffiatka of*c Metzem Park LID shall impede
- �tio¢services,to the Metrger Pads� PrOviam ofpaks,and
�ntimrabion of fhe h�Y
McbRm Park LID wN be considered as providing an additional level of servim to the
Dcigbbodwod above and beyond tbad provided by the Cn y.
YSgarB Udran Savioe A
. NovevabetTb,�i102 .
& TbAt fi o CITY and CODNTY writ oeordmate with Metro to bjvcafigVft Sm& solaces far
AcquMd m and mnoagewem of pada vdu&servo a rcakwat funcbaX
9- 71tBtMWnmayown and bethe provider ofregimwidepa&qaodopen space
!<aaTdk=wifdin the TMA_ Mcira Gamspace and Pado facmdas typicalty are to save a
baoadm pWutabm base than s=vices pmvi to residarCs ofthe T jS,A by ft Cl1Y. Where
app>icbk the CITY.COUNTY,and AGrMo wilt asptm to eoacdindo f y ty
manages and saviors.
<:r
i
i
Tag rdudxaSatreAgent
Page2G
E:LHiR1T E
PROVIMOVS OF AGREEMWMCT FOR ROADS AND STREETS
CITY and COUNTY agree:
1. COodi600s and Ag—
A. The COUNTY shall cOnfiow to retainjurisr5etion over the netwodc of arterials and
�'�the Tigard Urban Service Arra CrUSA)that am specified on the
roadway systemmthe Wasl&Wont-mtyTransportationplan:The
MY sball accept resp—'W"for public struts,local sheds,ncigbbodlrood routes and
collectors and odwr streds and roads that are not part ofthe COUNTY-wig road spm
within its boundaries upon amexation if the street or road mats the agreed upon standards
gibed is Section 2.C.(2)below.
B.-Mn COUNTY and MY 2g=to continue sbaring evopma t and services with renewed
e-Whazis m ftaclmg of traded services and shangg ofegmpmet without resorting to a
bMing sysiaq and—Proved schoduTmg ofsc rvices. AdMwoaliy,the COUNTY and
CITY shall woricto impwom coordination between the jcuis&*ous so that the sharing of
and services is not dependent on specific individuals wit im ear]rjrnis&cbon.
The COUNfY and CITY shall also wodc to establish a mom uniform accounting system
to track the sbariog and provision of services.
C. Upon anmaation to the CITY,the aoneaced area shall bg automatically va tr haws from the
Urban Road District(URMD).
D. Upon annecation to the CITY,an aonoced area that is part oftho Washington C"WLY
Service Distad For Street ljgbtiog No_1 sbalibe autwulicallywh7adrawn from the
District.The CITY shall assume respaasib ILY for shoot ligMmg On the c$edive date of
awn Of public streets and COUNTY SUbefs and roads that wM be transferred to flue
CITY The COUNTYsban inform PG$vdm=there is a c angb m road jruisdrgien er
Area a �oda rs and the annex arca is no a part ofthe stn et ligithog.
district
i
Z. Road Transfers
i Tiaustrref jurisdretion may be in0iated by repast from Me MY or the COjRgW
A- Road transfers Shall iadude the entire rigbt-of-vvay(e$•.a boundary cannot be set ddvm
the middle ofa toad)and proceed m a loecal manner that:prevews the creation of
segments ofCOUNTY roads within the CrrY-S boundaries.
Trgu¢Urban Service Agreement
Iiovember 26,2002
PAM 21
D. Withia thirty days ofaunczatiov,the CITY vnH mdate the process to transfer jwisdidion
of COUNTY and public streets and roads within tbo annexed area,umchrirfing{oral sheets,
scebbodwad routes,collectors and otter roads that are not of county wide sign fiance.,
TLD transfer of toads should talus no morn than one year from the cffectivo date of
amaralion.
Cl The COUNTY_
(T)To facRuaw the load transfer process,the COUNTY will prepare the exhibits that
document the location and condition of streets to be bansforred upon reccRrt of a
transfer request from the CT'TY.
(2)Pgorto firm transfer;the COUNTY_
(a)Shaft ewampkee say usaimtenance or improvemmrt proj—that have been planned
for theca rent fiord year or uansfea funds for same to the CITY.
(b)Shall provide the CITY with any informahm it may Lave about avy'--j&bodrood
or other onowr>s about streets or other traffic issues within the anamed area_
Wsmay be done by providing copies of COUNTYprojea files or od=
dowme ds or ttrrogh jourt meetings of CITY and COUNTY shag mashers.
(e)Shaft maim mcdod roadway impnovemeats so that all mdivulval roads or sheds
witbm the arm to be annexed have a pavement cou"m laden(PCI)of more than
40 and so that the average PCC ofstmod s and roads in.tho annexed alta is 75 or
higher_As in alternative to COUNTY-made imtmrovcmerrts,the COUNTY may
pay the CITY'S costs to mal—the necessary idnHovemruts.
(d)sball intorm the CITY of cadet ng maiatmance agreements Local Improvcw-t
Districts established for road maintenance purposes,and od`plans for maintenance
ofbans&red mads-The COUNTY shall withdraw the affected bnAmy from any
mad makdenance LIDS fnuved by the COUNTY
D_ The CITY.-
(1)Agras to accept all COUNTY roads and streets as defined by ORS 369.001(t)and
aft pabfic mads within the annexed area that are mot or are
not idmtficd in the COUNTY'S Transportation Pram as part of the countywide road
► system provided the average PCI ofaft COUNTY and public roads and sheets that the:
CrM is to accept in the annexed area is 75 of bWw as defused by the COUNTY'S
j .pavement management system. If avy individual COUNTY or public sued or road
j that the CITY is to accept witbim tho area has an average PCI of 40 or less atthe time
*f`aDvAxmfi0G,90 CITY shall assum .e or slicet only after the
t COUNTY has complied with Section 2.0 this cdubjL
(2) Shah inthe evo tthc transfer of roads does not occm-soon after anocmtion,inform
the needy ammexed residents of this fad and describe wham and tmdrr what Crux itiaos
. Tiyprd Urbau Servroo Ageement
Havcmber26,2002
P3M22
The twaafer tutu oo«cr ata t aw malut-avx tun be pg-vided until use kamkr is
Complete.
B TM C[rl AA be respausaae for die operating,uningejane,urd coaztrndinn eft
and streets transferred to lhe CUM as vxn as public sham annexed into the Crew_ Cn,
road standards than be applicable to trausfeared and amecsod streets_ The CITY span also
be responsible for are issasance,of access permits and other pmwmft to w=k wiwL the
rigMol-way of tlwse streets. _ -
3_ Road Design Standards and Review Procedures and Storm Dram
The MY and COUNTY sban agree on.
-
A the C and COUNTY wI toad standards and Cleat Waoar Service standards that
tvnb be appBmMc to the eonshaoben of=wAveft and zoods and fine ingxevatieats to
existing shreft and leads that eventually are tube transfxxcd to the Cny,and struck and
mads to be ttaast erred frail the C[IY to the CODNT Y;
B. the davdarvent Mviewprocewand devdapmmtraviewaarwardsSomCUUNTYand
public-streets and torr mvil(nntbc TUSH,indadmg COrUMrV st rec s and mads and
public shce'ts*at vvM become MYsheds,and sheets and reads that are or will bacoazme,
part oftbe COUNTY--wide road system;and
C. makeewacc raspousibility forth;Stoop draim8e m COUNTY stands and mads within
OWT USA in000pexa vridr Ocan Water Steiner
4. P�--ofDevclopme=tAppbcabarrsaadPlanAmeadmmts
A- The COUNIYairdCTfY,iaemyrmcbmviAQ`d Wasb'mgOonComl cam and the:
Ocagoa DcPwtmeat af1raasportatiw(ODOT),ASH agree an a prooess(es)and review
a•noe+ia(e-g,types and levels ofaoatysb)to analyze and condition development
appleestioos and plan—add for imparts to COUNTY and state mads.
B•7berevret►pmce-(es),review-V-9,andcritdatooendibmdovdop®eotand plan
ameadmoatapplicatians sbaD be ccvwstcrdwhh the Oregon HighwayPlm,the
Regtosnt
mon SJ ffmYk r,COUMY and CITY Tiangxwtatioa plans and Title 6 0£
1951W Urbdn GrowdsMmragrmentFimcuonal Pkm.
S. Maintmaooe CooperaCieu _ _ - _
j A_ IUCOUNIYandCITY,ia
i omjunchion turtle ODOT,shall aontiiderdeyelopnag an Utbaa
Road blainbemlooeAgreement wAmOxTUSAarcaSerBicma cegfCOUNTY,
C[TY,and state£anti iM Verde as scparatdy owned sections of arterial streets and W
Supplement&c 1984 Y=W a of Oregon Cities policy regamdiag traffic ligbts-
15LudUftm Scrvict Agwacment
Nuvembcr2lk 30M
Page 23
A TLe COUNTY and CITY,is oogq—don-wh other Washio0-Cowty-b-s.shall
develop a set ofmioi�*ice-of-way maa�aace spuds am levels ofaaimy to 6e
used m pmSonnanee ofsexvioes providod imdrs the ercba%c of services agre®ait
desabed above in S.a
C The COUNTY may'eoot-ad wah the CI[Y ferffiaum mDo®m of COUNTY streets and
wads withinthe IrUSA:utd=g an agmed upon huiliog systrm.
D. The COUNTY,CTIY and 0DO7;is cony With other Washl C--dy eiics,
win study oppodm cs for m-1�a mahMwanx f*mTfi a.
6- I.PuW=s4h
wuLmomyearoft6ecffizb edateoftWs;AGRRPAMr.theMYandCOUNTYagceeto
develop a schodde that desenb-when the peovisioos of*4s edubR shall he m V&=,catad_
i
i -
- TiPlndUr6:nSeivioeAgccoen+me _
Novembrr14Vat
T'a&24
F.XffiBrr F
PROVISIOM OFAGREn4KNT FOR$MUTARYSX WER
AND STORM WATER MANAGF.AMF
CLEAN WAM SffitVICm,(CWS),(TTY and COUNTY ages
I-- As a camty service-mid otgaumed under ORS 451,CWS his the legal authority for the
sanitary sewage and storm water(shtrface vroom)aaanIagdm-twith-the CCIY and tLe urban
uniocatporated arca_ CWS devdops standards and work pis.is the permt hoick,and
operates tlh= --w—ed plants-
2 The C[lYpafonms a portion ofthe local sanitary uevtcr and stormwater mamagearot
P-9—as defined is the operating agreemad bety=u.the erry*and CWS. Thus agreement
shall by-o&fwd ea as as-needed basis by esdi4es to the agmem at.
3_ Atthe time ofthis AGRIDEM hT,the followiog are specific issues that the parties have
addressed as part oftbis process and agree to resolve through changes to Current
- agrecumots.
A- Rdiabilit bon,of Sewer limes with Basins Idendfied with fgh Levds ofin5LYabon and
B- For limas that axe cost-eftttimto do rdwbilitation,CWS and the 4TIY va consider coat
mbaring tegardk=OfRoe sin undw a fmamula ami using$mrd,sauces to be agreed on
between C9 and CWS_The cost-SIQ=is to be debetmined through specific project
l ag—ents.Follow-g the cvaloation of ptogcanr funding mdLods,
CWS,is eoopaati—with the CHY,win dctonnine the 1mgAem fxmdiag for I&I and
otherrehabt7ttation pu jects.
C CWS,with assistance fromhthe CnY and other Wast iogtmn Counts,ed-s,shall nndatake
periodic rate txndics of nxm&ly service charges to detconimo vvltdherr they art adoq*aw m
egvrr—;ts,iadoduhg oasts of-aloe and tehabilitabom of wvm r Tines_ The rate
C study shall consider sewer Im.deterioKatman and related maintenance,and repair tvk=.
4- MastsandwatershedPlanning
r
A. Priomyresponslilityformastmand watecsbedplau-ng will mmamwith CWS,hatthe
CITY win be perxmdtcd to conduct such.planning as long as these phew mza CWS
standards_ CWS and the CITY shall nee rmiforuh stmodards,such as con4mom nxMICI ug,
to COM&NA these Shur=. CWS and the CFTY shall detaunme,their respective cost-spar ung
t rladyTioa'om&wtiogThese an&- .
rWdd Urban S«v oe Ag=mew
November 26,2002
Pa�e25 .
B. CWS-do-CllY,iu O-k odian wi&`0d—Washmgtan C—QlY c wz us ug the
CdYlDMUKt Comanttm estabhslwdby CWS,shall dcvclop=mdoem pr000&uea Sow the
000ednatiaa and paxt icipaAan betwaa CWS,do Cn Y and other civics when doing
masoerand wAtershedpla iu&
5. Sanitary sawn Systems Development Cha
CWS and the CHY,is oaojmro—with od—WaAwW-Cat-ty cities,shall use the resolts
of&e CWS Can�System ManaBcoucat Study,or updates,for options fix collection and
e5xpe nditm of SDC foods to addMM current dSspantip between where funds are conceted and
wbtie needs are:farprojects based at an agreed upon CnY/CWS master p}ffi
G. StotmwatL f�.t�ag._�system Devdopaseat(7rarges "
A. CWSandtbecr Y.sbanuse&onsultsoftheCWssm&.cwatw ptaa
Update project to address all aspects ofstormwater managcmaut and to provide mote
direction toCWSand the aM.-
B. Watershed plans being prepared by CWS for storm Water wanagement sbaff address the
major oolleWom system as wet[as the apendmmud sysoem to identity projeets for ftu lmrg
�. blaintmance
CWS,in.coaPeratiom with the Cr Yand other Washington,County cities.sball use the results
oftho CWS ConveyaaeSystem Management Study fargai&umdoresa missocsrelated to
rules oftheDISTRICTand the citiesiaOrder toprovide mon cost cfax;rr a maintenance of'
thecoffection.sysecrus.
C
J z _
J'
. rgar'durlrmSeiieeAgeoarreat
I4Ovcwbar36,2002
PaCc26
EMIT•G
PROVISIONS OF AOAEE ENT FOR WATER SERVICE
T1 M AMN VAU"WATER DWMCr OVWDI TWARD WAMM DLSIRICT
CITY and COUNIYagrM
L Supply:
A_ Supply D-WAY Wlll not impact service bor..sawcesdaries,Saves that a lo�ited n
p ovv1de all the water in We study arca and the wwnbex of i �bdvvaa
erg and—encouraged to continue is the irdue_
B-.Fwme supply and comscrvation issues may be added
Ceosor�to the eVient reasonable and Practicable for water vi Rqoonal WaLtr
County- Service Pmvidrss is the TUSA shall ca�ue to participate Pis a[Washuugton
and Use it as the s�FMr raising dim andm timn
�rPPly issues_ -
C The Consortium'my also save as a forum to discuss and r solve vvatrrpoLtical iss�res to
ibe extent reasonable and practicable for waterproVidoes in Washingtew
Ceusortiunis an appropriate forum to bring edoded officials toSdherand Scor y_Th.
» effiar�wwlong relationships on watts supply and 000servabo m issues Promatiug
D. andIotngoyegumental sgmemeas shall address owmshp ofd bet Wee"CITY'
sources,whether f—the purpose td-ho pwvisxm cif Water
Sit
OftThat iorpol�the-
he »ses is the case of a boun
daryff
dary change
- �-• s'„�•,aanoeririsin"6ertion_ - - - -
A. TV WD TWD and the CITY do not aubdpate any events m the forgeable future that
W—U> to rchabr-Tdatiea or reph 6catut beyond the tinamxl
reach,of
any ofthe watcrpwviders in the 1i7SA- Each provider wail a to be respr nsihle far
reserves to Inect�aeseeable streamthrougb rates and charges and to accam adequate
major weds_
i B. TV W11.T".CIIY,and COUM y agree to maintain and participate in the Cooperative
Public A5=ics ofWasbirooa Caurdy in order to CW-catly share and eacbaoge
1 C. To the=dm a reasonable and pracrirabk TVWD,TWD and the Cny mall romdmate
mandated(under Oregon law)Undagroond utility bmftg sery ces toeffid-flYProvide
service within the urban service areas,
T>t-d Ualba varier Azwc ue w
Movemua26.2002
D. IV".TWD and MY agree to provide to ane another copies oras-bmft ofaas&g
and newfacili"hes and other types ofwater system rmps The the proposes Off ditatwe
pla®arg,cog neer ng aid design efodwr udTntws or shuctux sthat may concoct adersect
arbebm'ItiapomnnidyioCllYSaZrtiex Thecrrir toiaoucpmatosaehmappmg
into its GLSMapping system ofutrlQies and other facilities.TV WI).TWD and Crry
agree to develop and min a oatunm,on-Ening.up to data GO mapping system
showwg&Cildws OEM*"atet provider within the TUSA.
3. Customer SecvicclWourRa[ra:
A- Men,ofsupplyand banded mdebbadasswHanostlikely h--fhagrcatesti Cal rates.
B. TV Vi WD,and the:MY believe that rates axe equitable:within the TUSA_
C. GivMadCq-Acwatwpressuts,level and quality afw vi csl ould's'Vary (y
among diffixicut;waterptovidas indn TUSA and does not appear to be as issue for amt.
- costooaers: -
a wdhdrawaIfAooccatiouadergw-
A- NotwitlesmudiogScdiaailofthssAGREEME T-Rulesaadgc -bde0ies�,�misting
agn betweenthoprovides,flednc maylead fiochanges mservice
Provision ar:ang -". to Anyschiceareaboundaryshau.cow#ywiU,
METRO Code Chapter 3,09 andprovisions id=tLficd uodw SoabonN Ifnecessarythe
Met-DoyAppedspt—shallbeemployedtoresolve cauffildsbetween parties as
iheyari TV WD,TWD;andthe MY shall couraaoa to ver&together to adjust
bowadatie s as appropriaGoto improve the cost-c Wm c fiveriess and efficacy ofproviding
B. In.the event ihat the entire service area ofany DISTRICT is ame,ced in the fuhnr,ant
district shall be dmalved"No at(cupt shall be made to maintaird dw district:rict by delaying .
annexation.ofatohrnportionofthedistrict{eg,the district offim).
C. The area ad-TV WD kaownas the Metzger service area shall remain m I-VWD,eaccpt
those porticos Agreed to by both TV 9VD and MY that may,be wrtbdrawn Ecom TyWD
upea ano n-h—to the CITY- In-mhangr„TV WD will suppatthe CITY jwniag as a
partarroftheJointWaterCammissia. -
D. Yrovidees that propose a Magee ruajw annexation or&golufiat shall give ad provides in
the study area an appott-ky to influence the decision as well as pbm for the
cansogeeocrs. NCoe afthe parties waives its right to contest a major or minor bomtidary
t daagcbyany cftbeother mtheissueofthe
patties appropriate service provider for the
jarcaan dbylhl—i-yd-ugec aeptwbmthepartybascapnmlywaived
that right as to a descubed service area in an agreement esccntod sabsoquamt to this
agr�
..��ave�re.answir reae�ertr-zsazeoe -
Tigard Urbm Service Agreement -
- Iloretuber 2k 2002
Pam 28
HOW94
.Y � 1
� l
_MANl-
R•'� It�f �.
�fJi
•' i ice=
Z Nm
r,
wore •1i51r'� ''=g pfl
err►•~ r
��,,,• ��_—��� . . ate..�
still
►' ��� Lam! iq1,��:��/��' _� I�fc:+ � ,■
N
x _ M � O
•a m m O 0 O .N- t0 CVM
O)
c Q } } Z Z } CD co rn
ID to
Q"
3
cam o
CO) >- > Z v n >m of v z t0
a
) N Co
co NN o r co N -I OD fn
m m o o m m ti m Oo a) I�
Z >- >- Z m a > co ao v } h
W N
ad N N o co
fA >m > Z m Z r ti vii co > Cl)
3 p N
N O
42) CO tD O N
Z ad � Zv a of V CD
w
r Y
co
rn m
W r z z ° a � i to
f. _rw.
N N N o to 0N ti
(n } t�0 d } C> OO Iq N Z I(1
N o 0
d N N o N m m ch
Z m >o- Z c`� o ~ Z N
Of o cn
} >- >- m Z w 1- N ti N N
� O
w n nm m
N Y
A — t6
M co ca m ? m
co ca C O)—
Q m 3n mmEa Q.. O m to O c';n >O m = a"
r = om ma o Nm 'N o0 >N 3 E m
i m > E 19
to v ca N rn
R c U t m e o co co
.i c CC 1 m N m—0,c o v C "C6 .�... = O XX m 'O C L
r > m 0 m a `mom _� j -0 Cp m m v N�1 p m h p 3
P
(Qm�E� (6 M V• O O O C6 'p
C1 CL m_ n�,'iWot rn> m o m �'� m v=° c rna� o m
C fl-O N w O R m 0 fl- C V.' 'p a!
O U c o vmi ca o T L' x x o"� x m~ Co c
_ 7 d C U O y'O R- m r
sem_ mW mom a in in �° w° o m > m c rn'x m 3 =
0CISC a� 0 Co
�i -3 V c.`v,>,E m s N O o m R min �-m O C C N C a
3 a m ocmmB�£�^ -om `o— "oc ~ cmi ccOi� x om �w
c'to > caia -'o m c R
vc6m � a€�Qm�o om-Amo = omooccamc� moa
W t- ¢- NU7mmncc` Z3WQLl- F- a)"o— m ¢-amQ a F-
APPENDIX F
ROADS THAT AUTOMATICALLYCOME UNDER THE CITY'S
JURISIDICTION WITH THE BULL MOUNTAIN ANNEXATION
1. SW.AUTUMNVIEW ST.
2. SW.TURNAGAIN DR.
3. SW. 122ND AVE.OFF BEEF BEND RD.
4. SW.THORNWOOD DR
5. SW.ASPEN RIDGE DR.
6. SW.WINTERVIEW DR.
7. SW.TERRAVIEW SR.
8. SW.SUMMERVIEW DR.
9. SW.SUMMERVIEW CT.
10. SW SUMMERVIEW ST.
11. SW. 133RD AVE.
12. SW.EAGLES VIEW LN.
13. SW 141ST AVE(WOODHUE TO EAGLES VIEW)
14. SW WOODHUE ST.
15. SW.COLYER WAY
16. SW VIEWPOINT CT.
17. SW TEWKESBURY DR
18. SW 144TH TERRACE
19. SW 145TH TERRACE
20. SW. 144TH PL.
21. SW. 141STAVE.(NORTH OFBULLMT.RD.)
22. SW. 1447H AVE.(NORTH OF BULL MT.RD.)
23. SW.HIGH TOR DR.
24. SW SUNRISE LN.
25. SW. 153RD AVE.
26. SW. 148TH TERRACE
27. SW SOPHIA LN.
28. SW.BURGUNDY ST.
29. SW.JULIET TERRACE
30. SW.BASK TERRACE
31. SW.DEKALB ST.
32. SW.POLLARD LN.
33. SW 161ST AVE(SOUTH OF BULL MT.RD.)
34. SW.COOPER LN.
i 35. SW.BRAY LN.
36. SW.KESSLER LN.
! 37. SW.HAZELTINE LN.
38. SW.164TH AVE.
39. SW.WOOD PL.
40. SW.COLONY PL.
41. SW.162ND AVE
'j 42. SW.PALERMO LN.
Appendix F-Page 1
43. SW.FLORENTINE AVE.
44. SW.TUSCANY ST.
45. SW.MILAN ST.
46. SW.LORENZO LN.
47. SW VENEZIA TERRACE
48. SW 163RD PL.
49. SW.STAAHL DR.
50. SW CATTAIL CT.
51. SW.LEEDING LN.
52. SW.SNAPDRAGON LN.
53. SW ROSHAK RD.
54. SW.DEWBERRY LN.
55. SW CROMWELL CT.
56. SW.KERRINS CT.
57. SW.GEARIN CT.
58. SW.HOOPS CT.
59. SW.DAHLIA CT.
60. SW.153RD TERRACE
61. SW.MENLOR LN.
62. SW.MAYVIEW WAY
63. SW. 152NDTERRACE
64. SW.KAMERON WAY
65. SW.BRIANNE WAY
66. S W.CATALINA DR.
67. SW 148TH AVE.
68. SW.RHUS CT.
69. SW 145TH TERRACE
70. SW PEACHTREE DR.
71. SW FIRTREE DR.
72. SW ROUNDTREE DR.
73. SW FERN ST.
1
1
1
Appendix F-Page 2
APPENDIX F
ROADS THAT WILL NEED TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM WASHINGTON
COUNTY TO THE CITY OF TIGARD
1. SW 1 19TH AVE CR 2131
2. SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD. CR 147/2
3. SW ASHLEY DR. CR 2786&CR 2858
4. SW CHARLSTON LN. CR 2876
5. SW SCARLET DR. CR 2786&CR 2711
6. SW PEACHTREE DR, CR 2786,CR 2858,&CR 2711
7. SW CAROLINA CT. CR 2786
8. SW RHETT CT. CR 2786
9. SW 136TH PLACE CR 2786
10.SW 137TH PLACE CR 2786
11.SW 139TH AVE. CR 2831
12.SW 141ST AVE. CR 2011,CR 2689&CR 2209
13.SW 144TH AVE. CR 2207
14.SW TEWKESBURY DR. CR 2820
I5.SW WINDHAM TERRACE CR 2820
16.SW HAMPSHIRE TERRACE CR 2820
17.SW BARRINGTON TERRACE CR 2820
18.SW GLASTONBURY LN. CR2820
19.SW AYNSLEY WAY CR 2820
20.SW WESTMINSTER DR. CR 2820 &CR 2766
21.SW CHESTERFIELD LN. CR 2766 &CR 2720
22.SW BARRINGTON PLACE CR 2766
23.SW CHARDONNAY AVE CR 2700
24.SW MOET CT. CR 2700
25.SW PINOT CT. CR 2700
26.SW 144TH AVE. CR 2700
27.SW CABERNET CT. CR 2700
28.SW 148TH PLACE CR 2947
29.SW CRESTRIDGE CT. CR 2927
30.SW 150TH AVE CR 378
31.SW GRANDVIEW LN CR 2867
32.SW 147TH TERRACE CR 2867
33.SW PEAK CT. CR 2867
34.SW 152ND PLACE CR 2475
35.SW BURGUNDY ST. CR 2826
36.SW 154TH TERRACE CR 2826
37.SW CABERNET DR. CR 2826
38.SW WOODHUE ST CR 2871 &CR 2803
39.SW SHOUE DR. CR 2871 &CR 2720
40.SW 147TH AVE. CR 2871 &CR 2720
41.SW HAWK RIDGE RD. CR 2295
42.SW CHARDONAY AVE. CR 2926
Appendix F-Page 3
43.SW 149TH PLACE CR 2803
44.SW 146TH AVE. CR 2720
45.SW ROSARIE LN. CR 2716
46.SW ROSHAK RD. CR 147%z
47. CR 821
48.SW COLONY DR. CR 2101 &CR 2252
49.SW COLONY PLACE CR 2101 &CR 2252
50.SW 16 IST AVE CR 2101 &CR 2252
51.SW COLONY CT. CR 2101
52.SW 157TH PLACE CR 2538
53.SW BAKER LN. CR 2538
54.SW 158TH TERRACE CR 2538
55.SW BULL MOUNTAIN RD. CR 262
56.SW PALERMO LN. CR 3070
57.SW MILAN LN. CR 3070
58.SW 159TH TERRACE CR 3070 &CR 2961
59.SW TUSCANY ST. CR 3070
60.SW 162ND TERRACE CR 3070
61.SW PALMERO LN. CR 3070
62.SW UPLANDS DR. CR 3070 &CR 2961
63.SW ROSHAK RD. CR 3070 &CR 2891
64.SW SNAPDRAGON LN. CR 2961
65.SW BRISTLECONE WAY CR 2961
66.SW SUNDEW DR. CR 2961
67.SW 161ST PLACE CR 2917
68.SW TEAROSE WAY CR 2917
69.SW DEWBERRY LN. CR 2917
70.SW BULLRUSH LN CR 2917 &CR 2873
71.SW 160TH AVE CR 2917
72.SW ROCKROSE LN CR 2917 &CR 2900
73.SW WINTERGREEN ST, CR 2917, CR 2873&CR 2948
74.SW YARROW WAY CR 2900
75.SW 154TH AVE. CR 2948
76.S W FIRTREE DR. CR 2948
77.SW ROUNDTREE DR. CR 2948
78.SW O'NEIL COURT CR 2891
79.SW FERN ST. CR 3071
80.SW CREEKSHIRE DR. CR 3071
81.SW JENSHIRE LN. CR 3071
82.SW HORIZON BLVD. CR 3071
j 83.SW 147TH PLACE CR 3071
1 84.SW COLYER WAY CR 3074
{ 85.SW TARLETON CT. CR 2711
86.SW ASHLEY CT. CR 2711
87.SW SCARLET PLACE CR 2711
88.SW GLASTONBURY LN. CR 2820
Appendix F-Page 4
89.SW 157TH AVE CR 2873 & CR 2900
90.SW LUKE LN. CR 2891
91.SW BECKY LAUNG CT. CR 2891
IMroYIwWdmeunuF maatenvautay roaOs toot metlbb4amM1nen-tW mmntan anroatentbc
Appendix F—Page 5
Change in Service Levels Between County and City Appendix G
For Services Where Provider and Service Changes
Upon Annexation
Police Washington County provides The City of Tigard would provide Yes
1.0 officers/1000 people 1.5 officers/1000 people. There would be
(.5 standard;.5 from Enhanced an increase of
Patrol).Response Times:Average Response Times:Average response approximately,
response times to Priority 1 calls(4 times to Priority 1 calls(1 minute,36 .5officers/1000
minutes,30 seconds)and Priority 2 seconds)and Priority 2 calls(3 people
calfs(6 atfgutes,7 seconds). minutes,59 seconds)_
(2002.data from Washington County (2002 data from Washington County
Consolidated Communications Consolidated Communications
Age cy Calls for Service Database) Agency Calls for Service Database
Parks Washington County does not provide The Tigard Park Master Plan calls Yes.
parks services. for 2 neighborhood parks and 1 The City
community park in the Bull Mountain provides park
area. The plan also calls fora small services.
playground to be built adjacent to the
Cache Nature Park.
General Road Washington County through the The City's road maintenance Yes
Maintenance Urban Road Maintenance District. performs maintenance on regular The City
General street maintenance by the schedules as well as on a complaint- provides
County is primarily on a complaint- driven basis.Typical maintenance additional road
driven basis.Typical maintenance activities include: maintenance
activities include: services_
pothole patching
pothole patching grading graveled roads
grading graveled roads cleaning drainage facilities
cleaning drainage facilities street sweeping
street sweeping mowing roadside grass and brush-
mowing roadside grass and brush (shoulder strip+ditch line)
(only.the shoulder strip) maintaining traffic signals
maintaining traffic signals replacing damaged signs
replacing damaged signs installing and replacing street
markings
crack sealing
vegetation removal for vision
clearance -
street light tree trimming for light
! clearance
! dust abatement on graveled roads
Long Range Washington County_This includes Ctty of Tigard.Annexation will allow the Yes.Annexation
I Planning comprehensive planning,such as master City to plan for growth on Bull Mountain will allow the City
plans_The 1963 Bull Mountain with an updated comprehensive plan for to plan for growth
Community Plan is the operative plan the entire community. on.Efull Mountain
Washington County has in place for the Miles Population Planners with an updated
Plan Area. 11.5 sq.m_ 44,070 4 comprehensive
Miles Population Planners (2002) plan for the entire
727 sq-m. 463,050 6.5 With annexation: community_
(2002 estimate) 13.5 N.m. 51,692 4