Resolution No. 03-48 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
RESOLUTION NO. 03-`,4y
A RESOLUTION APPROVING WASHINGTON COUNTY'S PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
THE WASHINGTON COUNTY — TIGARD URBAN PLANNING AREA AGREEMENT AND
THE WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE FRAMEWORK PLAN FOR THE URBAN
AREA TO MAKE THEM CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED TIGARD URBAN SERVICE
AGREEMENT.
WHEREAS, ORS 190.010 provides that units of local government may enter into agreements for
the performance of any or all functions and activities that a party to the agreement, its officers or
agents, have authority to perform; and
WHEREAS, Statewide Planning Goal #2 (Land Use Planning) requires that City, County, State
and Federal agency and special district plans and actions shall be consistent with the
comprehensive plans of the cities and counties and regional plans adopted under ORS Chapter
197; and
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard and Washington County have entered into the Urban Planning
Area Agreement to ensure coordinated and consistent comprehensive plans and identify a site-
specific Urban Planning Area within which both the City and County have a mutual interest in
comprehensive planning; and
WHEREAS, ORS 195.020(4)(e) requires cooperative agreements to specify the units of local
government which shall be parties to an urban service agreement under ORS 195.065; and
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard and Washington County have entered into the Tigard Urban
Service Agreement between the City of Tigard, Washington County, Clean Water Services, Tigard
Water District, Tri-Met, Tualatin Hill Park and Recreation District, Tualatin Valley Fire and
Rescue, and Tualatin Valley Water District, consistent with ORS 195.060 to 085; and
WHEREAS, the County last updated the Urban Planning Area Agreement previous to the
adoption of the Tigard Urban Service Agreement; and
WHEREAS, Washington County has proposed amendments (Land Use Ordinance No. 614) to the
Washington County Comprehensive Framework Plan for the Urban Area and the Washington
County — Tigard Urban Planning Area Agreement to make these agreements consistent with the
adopted Tigard Urban Service Agreement; and
WHEREAS, in keeping with UPAA amendment procedures, the Tigard City Council has
conducted a review of the proposed amendments (Exhibit A),
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council approves the proposed amendments to the Washington
County-Tigard Urban Services Area Agreement,as set forth in Exhibit A: Proposed
County Ordinance No. 614, Exhibit 2, dated July 15,2003.
SECTION 2: The Tigard City Council has no objections to the proposed amendments to the
Washington County Comprehensive Framework Plan for the Urban Area, as set
forth in Exhibit A: Proposed County Ordinance No. 614, Exhibit 1, dated July 15,
2003.
SECTION 3: A copy of this resolution will be forwarded to Washington County.
SECTION 4: The Mayor is authorized to sign the final, amended Urban Planning Area Agreement
with Washington County upon receipt from Washington County. Once signed,the
changes to the Urban Planning Area Agreement will be in effect.
SECTION 5: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage.
PASSED: This day of 12003.
ATTEST: or"-C igard
City Recorder- City of Tigard
EXHIBIT "A"
FILM
Ill T'IF-BOAR D OF COUNTY COMMSS IONERS
JUL17 2003
Wathington county
FOR WAS11INGTON COUNTY, OREGoN tufty ct
ORDNANCE T n f 4 O"' Amendingthe Comprehensive
fnr r Planfnr the Urban Area and till
Urban Plarming Ax0a Agreenjent,botl,
Elements of the Comprehensive Plain, Relating
tO Urban Service Agreemeuts
The Board ofCOUntY Commissioners of WasjjijjgtnjjCnnnt
,Oregon, o dstnts:
�f f
A. 717he Board of County Coonniss-
toners recogilizes that the "nrnt r
ft nnr f' .tnr plan fnr the
Urb, Area clement of the Comprehensive plan of fl
r tnc 0 le ntln and encs n
10 September 9, I ,with portions subsequently ant rnrl d by Ordinance
1ras, 343, 3 ,432
1 r- rnd l ,444(remanded),459,471,483, 5013, 516, 517,526,
B. The Board of Count
nfssi nn rs,tecOgrliZes that the Tigard Urban pinnnntrinn ;area Agreement
'3 W ns ad 7t d byway OfOrdinance No. 3.31
14 Caw SubscillluOln 01190ijug plauningefforts of the County indicate n need
firlnntnn�s to to
15 COmPtellcusi've Frujucw0ykplasm for the Urban Area and the Tigard Urban Planning Area
16 anent because of the adoption of Urban ServiceAgreements, Tite Board takes note that
17 such changes are necessay for the benefit of the t n tft,safety,", and general welfare;rnfthe
is residents of WashingWoCounty,
nb.
19 D. Under d r the Provisions of Washiltgt rn Countyflr Chapter
� the rd �s
Ordinance
Advisory <) sslnr
has carried out its responsibilities,inncludin
f„ preparation of 110tices,snd the
County Planning C onntnt ssidrn has conducted one or or
p In lnnmm�n�s tall the Proposed
22 not ndntents and has submitted its rewrinliendatiolL,,trn ttne
4 130, d. "f 13+ rd finds thatthis
a l -ORDINANCE w t
W °; n do C"rnrs s n.
n ,n-'w ,, w ,surm.340__ms Q4
IIHASSOko OP, 971244
I' t ;
(50.3) Ca-X7"47'- FAX: (503) 6-9636
I Ordinance is based on that recommendation and any modifications made by the Board,as a result
2 of the public hearings process.
3 E. The Board finds and takes public notice that it is in receipt of all matters and information
4 necessary to consider this Ordinance in an adequate manner, and that this Ordinance complies
5 with the Statewide planning Goals,the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan,the
6 Regional Transportation Plan and the standards for legislative plan adoption, as set forth of
7 Chapters 197 and 2 15 of the Oregon Revised Statutes, the Washington County Charter,and the
xr
8 Washington County Cormnunity Development Codc.
9
The following exhibits,attached and incorporated herein by reference,are hereby adopted as
I I wriendruents to the Comprehensive Plan:
12 A. ExItibit 1 (21 pages)arnending Policy 15,Roles and Responsibilities for Serving Growth,to
13 the Comprehensive Framework Plan for the Urban Area.
14 B, B. N "bit 2 (16 pages)amending the Tigard Urban Planning Area Agreement.
15 -SECrION 3
16 AJI other Comprehensive Plan provisions that have been adopted by prior ordinance,which
17 are not expressly amended or repealed herein,shall remain in full force and effect.
18
19lJ
20
21
22
'age 2-40RDINANCE NO.014 114%549
WASHINGTON COUNW C(AWSEL
155 K AM AWWc.-Stffr.340-MS AZ4
Hmcnow.OR 97124
Now- (503)846-$747-VAX: (503)846-M36
813MON4
2 All applications completed and submitted under former land use ordiart ees shall continue to
3 be processed,pursuant to the provisions of dic fonner ordinance,until a final decision is renderFd by
4 the County or the application is withdrawn, unless specifically provided etc; iso by low.
5 RQ11QhL5
6 If arty portion of this Ordinance,including the exhibits,strall for any r on be held invslid or
7 unconstitutional by a body of competent jurisdiction,tlw remainder shall not be affected thereby and
9 shall remain in full force and effect and any provision of a prior land use ordinance amended or
9 repeated by the strioken portion of this Ordinance shall be revived and again be considered in full
10 force and effect,
11 SEQTtQN 6
The Office of County Counsel and Department of Land Use and Trwisportation are authorized
13 to prepare p1mining documents to reflect the changes adopted under Section 2 ofthis Ordinance,
14 including deleting and adding textual material and maps,remern bering pages or sections,,and making
15 any technical changes not affecting the substance of these amendments as new,ssary to confdrrn to the
16 Washington County Compreliewive Plan formal.
17
19
20llf
21
22
P39e 3 —ORDINANCti NO.614 1�4043
WASHINMON CoWry Cotimiri.
155 R.FIRSTAVFrNUE.S(J4M140—MS#24
HRa. .OR V1124
NPUN (503)846-8741 FAX (503)946-8636
I _SECTION
This Ordinance shall,take effect thirty days after adoption.
ENACTEDis day of 2003,being the reading
4 r the Board trt r sion r o W shingt rCounty,
f
5 Oregon. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
t: AIRMA
8
RECORDING SECRETARYM
to READING
First
11 Second
"1urE
12 r-
µ
Fid � ,...
1 �T : Nay
14 Recotding Secretary: ate:
1
1
1
111
1
20
21
22
Page 4--() 2 NO.fi t
wAstar4cToN comwCOME.
155 N,FwsT Avrwe,std 340- S#24:
JhLtshoao,OR 97124
Now, (503)946-9747,-VAX. (503) -8636
Ordinance t
Exhibit t
July 15,2003
Page 1 of 21
PONcY 15 of the Co P 'hensly FrarnewOrk Plaft FOr Tile Urban Area i
amended s follows-
Implementing
ollows-Im nti strategies
The County will:
PrePare a public fir itis plan in amordance with OAR Chapter 660, Division 11, Public Facitities
Planning-
b.
l ni .b. Continue to provide the following facilities and seivices as resources mit:
Service Portions of COU*seirved
Public flew County-wide
e
Sheriff tr l U t _ `d (limited)
Assessment and Taxation nth I+
Road Maintenance Countyads
nd Development Regolat;nos Unincorporated Areas Only
Said Waste Collection Syst Unin=porated areas Only
Management(tom nisi
Solid Waste Disposal Unincorporated Areas id
e UGS
COOPeraLive Library System rit --av
Records and Elections County-wid
lrr _ i `tl� I"ri trar� t +cit"' rrd s it s ditri I
s r r r ryts tfi rt' cld ss ll rri r °gar rrd t rint n
trrtb
rr err istr�t vr"rttt � r arrrartt + 1 _ _ Ur I
rr is Il id t' t s prc��ridr�rs i`bl+ tom° 'r I r vii�rr t
r�r s d � ttr r�lttrrrt sr�r f �rrd, rrrf dt�t rc��rirrm kr� ra s i
.r� rt sail Isra"` rrti tls srori�c "sttrri r" i' � fir � p fril i � sr�oi
td irrtr ft° 1 .
greernents-
,_Fire
� r rblit `fr'await
Obcdcf Proposed s ddit` rs
Ordinance 614
")ib,k 1
July 16,2M3
Page 2 of 21
• Sewer
• RopLds�arid.
Streets
• to Water
—Water
I-NOw -__kLffie T` rel Urban ServiceAr the d i n Ir rr t rr sd t rte n
seryjqes!qqi `t�+d r �
Long-Term.Erovider
sin
the c e rtwd qvett^m. the r
990—n
- artment of TrtorrI Iii-in—1hel
state hiaftway§Ysterrij
Sewer
District an
the Tioard Water District
60- Establish a coordination system with all cifies, SP"I districts and prhrate sompanies that now or will
Provide services to the present unfamporated "a. This coordination system WM be designed to
ensure'that the following"s ofserVices and facilities wit be provided when needed to exisfing and
Mure County residents and business"in accord with the Comprehensive Plan-
1. San tary sewage collection and treatment.
2. Drainage management,
3. Fire protection,
4. Water distribution and storage,
S. Schools,
6. Libraries.
T Utilities(electricity;telephone and cable communications,natural gas,etc.).
8- Solid waste di 1,
0. Roads and transportation facilifies.
10. Parks and recreation faciatiM
#��ef ProPosed additions
abOM Proposed deletions
–------------
Ordinance'614
ulibit I
July `15.2W3
Page 3 of,21
11. Police, and
12. Transit,
"Q' if aPpraPriatc*in the future,enter into agreement$with service pro w r which add
M re
of the following: Adler:s I ich a ress one or 6
1� Process for review of development proposals.
2- PrOcess for reviewaf proposed Service extension or Wily exPanslon,
3. -SerVice district or city annexation,
4* lonnirrg Of sOlVice extensions,new facilities,Or facility expansions,
5- P"Ocedures for amending the agreement,
6. Methods to be used to flea anceservice,and or facility improv .
em ts
en op
eration and mainten'arice,
7.
Standards to be used by the COUnty and the servioe provider -
levels, in assessing ad irate"` service
8. Area or clientele 10 be Served now and in the future,
9' Cons'sten'cy with Plan Policies and strategies,
10. Coordination of capital improvements P"rerns,and
Cost effectiveness of service;xoVi$jon_
'W"'ka t"'011ies4o4orinally4ei;
y` card f
or
f li OPPII pica ed annexations to a cit'
of
Urban Plaing Area Agreement-
nndi.trig Vittich are in acmd with an
rarreation Anni n Or-ban, r ent or terc aide
eved
I I - —
dis at are
reement are deemed to'6 _Udan
shin
11, �Silye Pan�
fl4 Upon annoxat"on int''the area in the vicinity Of M Garden Home Road and SW atRoad by the
CRY Of Beaverton consistent with the BeeNertio"U>er"and Urban Sevice Boundary, the City of
Portland shall Oonsent to annexation by Beaverton of that area south*f-SW Garden,Home ROM and
west Of OlesOn Road that iscurrently in Portland.
h. r-or the Raleigh Hills Center as shown on
ictiens
affected Juriscr the acknOWledged Metro 2040 Growth Cor$icepl Map, the
planning of Ejeaveirion,Pod'anid.Wash'tn9tOO County and Metro shaft enter into an urban
provisions relating to town M
agreement to "ass"fe implementation Of the Urban Growth MainagMent Functi ;at Plan
centerS, including the establishmeryt of town center boundaries and
dernonstratinn Of target caparcities for' and housing.
abcdef Proposed additions
abcdet PrOPOI deletions
Ordinance 614
Extri'lift 1
July 15,2003
Page 4 of 21
i, Work ith Citizen Patticifration Organizations to identify and describe specific concernsrelated to
Possible future annexations lend to citieswhich but Community PlanningAreas- T ns
h
sa considered by the County duringrenegotiation Urban Planning Area Agreements.
j. Support porsat'on of now communities provided that inmporation will result in the provision of
services in the most efficient and c t effective manner and is not in vidlation of an already westing
Urban Planning Area Agreement between en my and an affected city,
kc operate in the development,adopt` ,and implementation of a master plan for library services and
facilities based'on e survey of County library ,develop e financial plan for operating library
services in the County, with emphasis on the establishment of a multiple funding base, with the
involvement of the Washington my Cooperative Library Syst Citizen Advisory Board, cities,
community libraries,school districts.the Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District,and citizens.
I_ Enter into intergovernmental agreements with ttigh growth school districts which are consistent with
ORS 1g5.020 anti ORS 195.110,sand which contain at a minimum the following herbs:
1. An explanation of how objective criteria for school capacity in the District's s000l facility plan will
be:used by the County.
. School District inv olve nt vrithi the Court s periodic review,and
3. How the County will coordinate comprehensive plan amendments and residential land use
requialloo amendruents°citta the District,includirig notice of hearing.
"f se intergovernmental agreements may be `adopted by the Board of County Commissioners
through Resolution and Order.
Summary Findings and Conclusions
Public facilities and services nemsary for growth in Washington County historically have been provided
by a variety of unrelated i districts, local governments,, and other agencies. Cooperation and
coordination between service providers in developing plena and prognarnming capital facilities has been
liff lited.
The County has the nslW1tit under State low to 000r4inate the timely provision of public facilities and
services within the County. Due to the thatCounty itself does not provide a full range of urban
services,the best means of fulfilling p` ibilityr icha will result in a better living environment t herr
County resident is the formal establishmentsof a strong coordination system between the County and
alt service providers end of art e r ' ant .
In 1993 the State Legislature ,adeptod Senate Bill 122 `ata ' s CARS 1136 requireS local
e ant to to dstablisha urban e d cd s t n+r# an_serAce
aoreements. ORS 195.060 to 080 r uir I governments to determine "I b_the a ti ate
urbans maid the fall in services: fire, t a r gat` o n r
streets marls grad ublid d. In Iditiun to these services. WashingtonMoura Irerrtira s
determined i that tar enforcement grad=sto ter s s Id arra be dclr urban service
agLqftm_ents idnotify ultimate sei area of each rov` d 4kq_tft the se,rviice_pr_o_vis-io-n-gMn-cigi-e-s
for each tubera e `` err s i a r ` m a I° tele to land inside tete Rqqjgftat-UrbOn
fro asrad irtcludin in mat nand ural ► ra d yeas n rv" e r rndnts 11e
"!, rtaat t in thae timet ertd ffaci roviiu cif utti fecit" s orad se _ in the
rats
ph_cdef Proposed additions
abcdef Proposed deletions
Ordinance 1
Exhibit 1
July 1; ,2003
Bags 5 of 21
The County has the additional responsibility to its cftens of,ensuring that the to
allow
growth will be provided by the agency garnn best to to d o to r t d, ffi t t
effective manner. Therefore, my review of and recommendations on annexation r`<incorporation
Proposals involving cities and special sefvice districts is imperative.
Atggef` PrOPosed auditions
abcAef Proposed deletions
Ordinance 614
Exhibit 1
July 15,2003
Page 6 of 21
Delete the City of Portland Urban Service Area . Fite A of Policy5.
Cly of Portland Orban ServicewArea
Map t
Plate A of Policy t
a�
i'
t
East Seavetton Uttien ServiCer
City of Podland
gbc&f Pmposed additions
Proposed deletions
Ordinance 614
ExhiNt 1
JkAy 15,200a
page 7 Of 21
Delete City of Portland Urban ServiceArea Map 1 platy B of policy 1 ,
CAY f Portland Urban an i Area
MapI
pirto 8 of POICY 15
v r�
LN
14
East Beaverton Urban service eoumary
Washington COINtult ret Co, ry
City of Portland
Ctyoff)eaverton
Rb—qgg Proposed additions
abrAef Proposed oeletions
Order 614
E , '1
July 15,
page 8 Of 21
Delete the City of Portland Urban SerVice Area Map f Ptate C of Policy 15.
Cly of Portland Urban Service Ama
Map 1
Plate C of Polity 1
good
m
l
am
le
h
HIS ane
N
ri
�w
ryl
East Beaverton Urban Service Boundary
Washington Co IMultnom ah Co. Boundary
City of Portland
COy of Beaverton
Proposed dpi'
Proposed deletions
Ordinance 4
Mbit
MY 15.2003
Delete the City Of Portland Urban Service Area Map I --Flats D of Policy IS_
Page 9 of 21
QY Of Portland urban Semice Are,3
Map I
Brats 0 of Policy
E
rr
i
'd
DTREE
Z
H
F W
I
4
ll
East Seaverton Urban s'ervice
;^v,*- Washington cojMultnomah CO3 Boundary
Boundary
oft QV Of P rtt . d
ter rr
(Winance614
ExIfibitA
Ady 15,2003
Page 10 of 21
Delete the East Beaverton Urban S itArea Map 2 of Policy5.
East Beaverton URban Service
Map 2 of Policy 15
y
fr
Eget Beaverton Urban Service Boundary
Washir4on Co IMultnomah Co. Boundary
JIM i` rated Area
abet Proposed additions
Proposed deletions
Ordinance 614
EXW4
;arty 15,2003
POge I I of 21
Delete the City of Portland Urban Service Area Map 2—Plate A of Policy 15,
City of Portland Urban Servicew Area
Map
Plato of Polity t
31,
r
x
s
�e1
Eant Beaverton Urban ServeBou"dafy
Wastiington CoNuftnomah Co, Boundary
City of Portland
Al d f Proposed rt ddltion
f PrOPosed deletions
Or,dinance 614
Exhibit'l
.tray 15,2003
page 12Of 21
Delete the City of Nxtfand Urban Service Area Plate 0 of Policy 15.
Cy of PottlandUrban Sjetvice
Map 2
pwe a of POICY 15
Vw
LN
q
n
i ` %
ST
East Navefton Orban Service Boundary
Washington1 maty Co, Boundary
NEWSOM
City of Portland
CRY of Reaverton
ef ProPosed additions
Ordinance 614
E�Kstfit
JUlY 15,2003
pa"13 Of 21
Mete the City of Portland Urban Service Area Map 2 Plate C of Policy 15-
CAY of15-Podfa d Urban Service Area
Map
Plate C of Policy 15o
N �
t�
East Beaverton Urban Service Boundary
Washington COA&Atnomah Co. Boundary
CRY Of Portland
CdY of Roaverton
AW—ef Proposed additions
Proposed deletirxis
Ordinance 614
Exhibit 1
July 15,2003
Page 1f 21
Delete the City of Portland Urban $mice Area Map 2- late D of Policy 15.
Cdr of Portland n Service Area
map 2
Hate D of Policy 1
UNOTREE
w
East Beaverton Urban Service
Washinoton Co MultnomCo. Boundsty
"y of Portland
y of Beavetton
aboe—f Proposed additions
abcdof Proposeddeletions
OInancq 614
Ebjt 1
July 2003
pa0e19 Of 21
NN
At
10
on
b
wh
,r.
#
yy*♦M { s i * %� r: �" *w*� { 4 thaw* �,
M
* r * M*
4
pyy4 M. y y 9 *t 4 W y
id* M#4 p r^Xt�R Mt{M;y aaM 4>g*kms 4{M gip. 9 k s �R*#� "pis
A 4 q
YJ ,yt♦ M***# ;^w�p; ry { ,x M#4 p{M# 'ySO�dg
�b
pqxy 1, 4♦* r�
4V a{# { ht M M 4{
s
*. ..
k
OrdinaMe 614
Exhibif
July
Page 16 of2
The following map is added to Policy 15 of the m r ns Plan For The Urban Area
Portland Urban nService Area
Index Map
M
�9
Podand Urban Setvice Bound"
Washingfort COMLAtnomah Co. Boundary
Abodef Proposed addifions
abc4ef Proposed defebons
Ordinance rye 614
Exhibit
.fly 1 ,2003
Page y of 21
The follaMrig mp is added to Policy IS of the p r Plan For The Urban;drew:
City of Portland ars Servioe Area
Map
low 90--4*C04wtf
y
Pod
r
and Urban Swvice BourKWy
Cty of Portland
Proposed dditl
Proposed deletions
Ordinance 614
itiilt
:duly 15,2003
Page IS of
The following map is added to Policy IS of the Comprehensive Plan For The Urban
City of Portland Urban ServiceArea
Map B
a
y
x
A
otta d Urtan Service Boundary
Wash44on Co Multnomah Co.Boundafy
Cty of Poffland
abcAW ProPosed deletions
Otdinance 014
Exhibit 1
July 15,2003
Page 19 of 21
The following s added to Policy 15 of the r e Plea For The Urban Area:
City of Portland Urbart SeMce Area
Map C
a„ .
Poru
zk. ,
u
and Urban$ ice Boundary
WasheoOfk COJMLAnOmah CO,Boundafy +
Cdy of Pottlen
b d f P(Oposed additions
PrOPOsed doletions
OriAnance 614
Exhihft
,duly 15,2,003
`age 20 of 21
The fOROWN asap is addedto Policy 5 of the Comprehensive Fleet For The Utban
City of Portland Urban SeMce Area
Map
kL
f
Portland Urhan Service Bwndary
Wastiington ComAtminahc .soundary
Cly of PoWand
Proposed additions
Proposed l+ t` s
00090ce 614
Exit 1
PaP25 200
1 of 1
e
W�
EJ ro
"`tea
„ .
C�
n� n
x
f0v
U5
co
t1
rdinO ' t
Exhibit
JU1Y 15.2003
Page 1 of 16
The a it ton COUP - Tigard Urban Planning Area'Ar
amended s shornbelow: �r
l rbAu Planning Area Agreement
TMS AGREEMENT is entered into WSHINC�TC
C� , l t al subdivision the 'tate Of Oregon,hereinafter rete to as �
"COUNTY". d the CITY FIGARD incorporated Municipalityof the`tate
hereinafter referred.to as "CITY". of Oregon,
n,
WHEREAS,C ' I9t 90w01 0 provides that units of meta ar enterart
the --rfo ccs dC ,or all fun tions "t d activities that a o its t rr
agents,have authority t p rf and air int, t `o or
WHEREAS,Statewide Plaming Cabal d Use lel
anning)requires and Aral agency and special ial district Plansd actions shall b rtsist at City, County,Ot to
comprehensive with the
197; , " of the cities d uritis d rem al s ar opt d Mader QRS Chap
WHEREAS, ter
the Oregon on d Conservation d Development o i. ion requires
jurisdictio r tin k wiledt o � ►li to s a
mans b which comprehensive l iunrt setting forth the
Boundarywill b implemented; dgtordiratiorwithin the Regional Urban Growth
Ty ha ter inti rati `a t
!d�tsurf
Ii raft at r- aft r creat or and h +arta sprat r yes c rtsistert with 9 d � ..
w
err '
°t� 'l at � s �d"' `air istrit t `lata Mills
& t
awndt latirt ally Niru d Asn Tuafatrt rtllatr istritconsistent ration
" l9 tCiCt t e w _ swith
WHEREAS, the COUNTY and the CITY, to ensure cOc rdivat l and consist
Plans,consider it mutually adv tag aus to blish: �t Comprehensive
l A site- ire Man Plalloing Area within the Regional Urban Growth
Within which both the COMFY and the CITY maintain . interest oundary
Comprehensive pla ior,
ate t PFOPosed addition$
Pro deletions
Ordinance t4
July 15,2003
Page 2 of t
process for toordinating comprehensive planni
OrdinanCO614
Exhibit
July 15.2003
Page 3 of 1
of the CITY ccrrnlrrehen ive plan or implementing regulations. The
following procedures shall be followed by the CojjWy and thClTyt
notify and involve one another in the Process to amcnd or adopt a
cOmPrebensive plan or""Pleruentitig regulation:
a. The CITY or the COUNTy,whichever has
jurisdiction over the
Proposal, hereinafter the oriOnatiug agency,shall rioti y the father
agency, hereinafter the responding g cy of the proposed action
at the time such plazining efforts e initiated, but in no case less
that 45 daYS prior to the final hearing n adoption. The specific
method and level Of involvement shall be finalized by
"Memorandums r Understanding"ing negotiated and signed by the
planning directors of the CIT arcd the COIJNW.
"Menrorandurns of Understandinel shall clearly outline the
Process by Which the responding agency shall participate in the
adoption proe ss. If,at the time otbeing notifiedof a proposed
action, the responding agency determines it does not creel to
participate in the adoption procoss,it may waive the requirement to
negotiate and sign a"Memoranduat of Understanding".
'#
The originating agency shall transmit draft recommendations on
;y Proposed actions to the responding agency for its review
comment fore finalizing. Unless otherwise ato in a
"MOMOtandum of Understanding" the responding agency s1wil
have t (10)days after receipt of a draft to submit comment,$
orally Or in Writing. Lack of feSPomw shall be considered"'no
Objection"to the drak
c. The originating agency shall respond to the comments made by the
responding agency either by a revising the final recommendations,
mer dations,
or b by letter to the reVonding agencyplain n why the
conunents cannot bd addressed i the final draft.
d• Co is from the responding agencyshall be 'vera
consideration as part of the public record on the proposed tiort.
If alter such consideration,,the originating 49cory acts contrary to
the Position of the responding agency, the responding agency may
seek appeal ofthe action through the appropriate appeals body and
procedures.
e. Upon final adoption of the proposed action by the originating
Wncy,it shall transmit the adopting ordinance e to tyre responding
ponding
agency n as publicly available,or i(n t adopted by
Ordinance, whatever other written documentation is available to
Property inforut the responding agency of the sinal actio errs
&C—def PrOPOsed additions
abWef PrOPosed deletions
Ordinance 614
E
July 15.2003
Page 4 of 1
B. Ph.-velopment Actions Requiring Individual Notice to Property Owners
1. Definition
Development Action Requiring Notice incans an action by a local
government which requires notifying by mail the curers of property
which could potentially be affected d(usually specified as a distance
measured in feet)by a proposed development action which directly affects
d is applied to a specific parcel or parcels. Such development actions
may include,but no -li ' `tod to,stuall tract zoning or comprehensive
plan amendments,conditional or special use pennits, individual
subdivisions,partitionings or planned wit developments,variances, and
other similar actions requirml;a hearings rim pr e' ss which is quasi-judicial judicial in
nature.
`
The COUNTY 11 provide the CITY withthe opportunity ni to review
comment on proposed development e t ties requiring notice within the
designated U Planning Area. The CITY will provide the COUNTY
with the opportunity to review and comment on proposed development
tions requiring notice within the CITY limits that may have an affoct o
unincorporated rtions of the designated r Planning Area.
1 The following procedures shall be followed by the COUNTY and the
CITYto notify one another ofproposed development a ores:
a. a MY or the COUNTY,, hichev has jurisdiction over the
proposal,hereinafter the originating c ,shall send by first
class mail a'copy of the public hearing notice which identifies the
proposed development action to the other agency,hereinafter e
rosponding agency,at the earliest ort nity,but no less than tern
10 clays prior to the slate oft e scheduled public hearing. Ile
failure of the responding agency t receive a notice shall not
invalidate an action if good faith attempt was made by the
originating agency o notify the responding agency,
b. T&agency receiving the notice may respond at its discretion..
Comments may be submitted written form or an oral response
may be made at the public hearing. ck of written or ural
response shall be considered"`iso objection"to the proposal.
C. ffreceived in a timely manact,the originating agency shall include
or ate cfh the comments to the written staff report and respond to
any concerns addressed by the responding agency in such report or
orally at the hear`.
bbd f Proposed additorts
Proposed deletions
Ordinance 614
Exhibit
July 15,2003
Page,5 of 1
d, Comments from the responding ageneyshall be given
consideration as a pait of the public record on the proposed action,
If,aftersuch consideration,the originating agency,the responding
agency may seek appeal of the action through the appropriate
peals body procedures.
C. Additional Coordination ,e uiremrr is
t.
The CITY and the COUNTY shall coca the following to notify oneCher
ofproposed actions which may affect the corturrunity,but ate not subject
to the notification and participation requi contained in subsectiow
d 8 above.,
a. The MY or the COUNTY,whichever has jurisdiction over the
proposed actions,hereinafter the originating agency, shall send by
first class mail a copy of all public hearings agendas which contain
the proposed actions to the other agency,hereinafter the
responding agency,at thetarliest opportunity,but no less than
three t days prior to the date of the scheduled public hearing.
The failure of the responding agency cy to receive a agenda shall not
invalidate an action if a good faith attempt was made by the
originating agency to notify the responding agency.
1 . Ue agency receiving the public "erg agenda may respond at its
discretion. Comments may be submitted in written fonn or an oral
msponse may he made at the public hearing. cls of written or
oral resportse shall be considered"'no objection"to the proposal.
0. Comments hom the responding agency sW be given
consideration as a part of the public record on the proposed action,
If,after such consideratioxr,the originating agency acts n to
e position of the responding agency,the responding agency may
seek appeal of the action'through the appropriate appeals body and
procedures.
III.
CourprehensivePlanning and Development Policies
X ,fictive Planning Area
I Definition
Active pl rind Area means the incorporated area and certain
4 o rated areas contiguous to the incorporated rat a for Which the
CITY conducts comprehensive planning d seeks to regulate
E
44gd—ef Proposed additions
Abcdef Proposed deletions
Ordinance 614
Ott
July 16,2003
Pale 6 of 1
development activities to the greatest extent possible. The CITY Active
Planning Area is designated as Area A on Exhibit"A".
.. ' e CITY shall be responsible for comprehensive plarining withinthe
Active Planning Area..
3. The CITY is responsible for the preparation, adoption srt l amendment of
the public facility plan, rrtr by OAR ti 11 witinn,the Active
planning e .
4. The COUNTY shall not approve land divisions within the,Active Planning
Area hide would create eats less than Ift acres in size, s public
sewer and waiter service are available to the property.
,A
S. ` 'lac CCI shell not approve a development in the.Active Planning
Area if the proposal would not provide vid for,nor be conditioned to provide
for,an enforceable plan for,redevelopment tea urban densities consistent
with CIT Y's Comprehensive Plan in the future upon annexation to the
CITY as indicated by the CITY Comprehensive Plan.
Approval of the development actions in the Active Planning Areastiall be
content ripen pro "siren of adequate urban services including sewer, vaster,
storm r ` e,streets„ and police and fire protection.
`. The COUNTY shall not oppose annexation to the CITY within the
CITY"s Active Planning .
R Area of Interest
I. Definition
an
Area of Interest or Primary Area of Intemt means unincorporated lands
contiguous to the Active Planning Area in which the CIT""' does not
conduct mp a i e planning but in hich the CITY does maintain an
interest in comprehensive planning development tion .by tlae
COUNTY because ofpotential impacts ran the CITY,Active Planning
A . The MY Area ofInterest within the Urban Planning -cis is
designated Area B on Exhibit-A".
The COUNTY shall be responsible for, rap e e i e planning
development actions within the Area of Interest-The COUNI'Y has
rite r into an inter rave thl a rrrerrt, r tlr Ili gt fca the CITY
"I'"Y
t r c land developiagot services on behalf ofile CQIJNDLwit
the scam"Interest. r was Irrt art til s rrrerr the l`I"
@bcdef Proposed tt s
abcdet Proposed rteteti s
Ordinance 614
Exhibit
July 15
Page 7 of 16
to 1bg area on
m The COUNTY is responsib1c,for die prepaTation, adoption and amendment
of the publicfacility plea required by OAR 660-11 withinthe Area of
.~ t ,..
atheu
thin-the
m
WWf
f
1t Proposed addivions
ProPosed deletions
Ordinance 6.14
Exhibh 2,
July 16,,2003
Page 8 of 16
C roraacaticas
rthr-v1'ry ita ti statsUvice
as,the ultimate local
=Lm—ance-wqxid—cr to at I,of the ten-iLW Lin
A
r" r rodttt emit rated r i o that aEE r rties with;.
e Ti the COUNTY
grade
CITY—and COUNf Y- ire to ter01AT th't to the
ID "'r
y inon ic" rd r' offi
— y
F�vjsion to residents
and jjc�jncs
—Inordec ices to the
CITY S as thetdst
ro x&tioqs to tho
riwever. s not
ert ownyrs tco
My
shall enter into an
the two will coin I
RggiffEgm:4
M►eans
rat ioninrte-ro-gx-qrC—ommunit . I
v Plannin LALca Witl
L"M
coEr t% cot tco in the My
r ani cod its i Eco rt« co the A tg nf;twjiviAijal
t� —
opt . i
�jtatutps.
ere.5t to t1te ITY, the
ions to CITY Ian
dit use rovisions
oxe the Crfff Y a
to in of thw' designation for gLne Mr after the effective date of
anecors
Pla Dirt
designation Ls oqt4.atc4
aiad at pro tett a O taut hsr the rt Iver.
is—0
4400
Pro os addigons
abWef Proposed detetions
Ordinance a 614
"tbttt
July 1t 2003
Page 9 of 1
D. special Policies
1 The CITY said the COUNTY shall provide information fmp ehe nsiv
planning and development actions to the Community Planning
+C r mations(CPC )through the notice procedures outlined in Section 111
of this Agreement.
2 At least one copy of any COUNTY of in c which proposes to 1
end they COUNTY comprehensive plan, adopt a new plan,o
amend the text of the COUNTY development code shall he mailed to the
CITY withinfive C5 days after its introduction,
,t least one copy of 'COUNTY rdinance which proposes to rezone
land within one 1mile of the corporate litnits of the�C I T'Y shall be
mailedto the CITY i l to five(5),days after its introduction.
4 City of Tigard,City of Beaverton and Washington County have
agreed to the following stipotations reg"ng the connection of Murray
ulc and from Old, dolls Ferry Mosel to the intersection of SW 120
Avenue d Gaarde Street:
a, '1"l c City of Tigard,City of Beaverton and Washington 'oeant
agree to axnend their respective prehen iv plans to reflect the
following functional classification and design considerations:
1. Designation. 'oil tots
2, Number of Travel : 2(plus turn lanes at major
or
int tions
Dile : Yes
4. Right-of-Way: 60 feet(plus slope eassanents where
n
Pavement Width. 40 foot minirman
6. Access: Limited
7. Design Speed: 35 M.P.H.
8. Minimum Turning itis: 350 to 500 feet
9. Parking Facilities.- None provided on street
g t Proposed additions
Ordinance 614
Extta>10
July 1 ,2003
Page 10 of 16
. Upon verification of need by traffic analysis,the
connection Tnay he planned to eventually accornmodate
additional lanes of the carry/told Scholls Ferry' a
Murray/New S hblls Ferry intersections.
11. TIo intersection tion o f tlw SW 13 aao and Murray
Boulevard connection °ill be,designed i h Murray
Boulevard as a through street with 135*Avenue`
terminating at the Murray connection with a"'I"
intersection.
1 . The general alignment ofthe Murray Boulevard connection
is illustrated in Exhibit '.
b Any changes to the land use designations in the Murtay Boulevard
and
connoction area shall be coordinated with all jurisdictions to assure
that traffic impacts are adequately analyzed.
The ter of Tigard,City of Beaverton hi ton County
shall support improvements to the regional hmsportation system
as outlined in the adopted Regional Transportation Irl
0111
"ted
0.
o tGaefdet
S. The COUNTY and the CITE will execute a Memorandum' o
Understanding outlining the medWologyfor transfinring CCU
records regarding land use activitiesto they CFIY when property is
annexed to the
I . Amendments to the Urban Plannine Area Amectnent
Ordinance tit
ExNbii
July 15.2003
Page of 16
b. A statement of"findings indicating by the proposed muendmerd is
., if the request is to arnend the planning area'boundary,a`map which
clearly indicates the proposed change and surrounding area.
3. Upon receipt of a request for amendment from the originating agoncy,die
responding agency shall schedule,a review of the request 1 fore the
appropriate io n y, with said review to he hold within 45 days of
the date the request is received.
4. The CITY and COUNTY shall make pod faith efforts to resolve h °ts
to amend this agreement. Upon completion of the rieview,the reviewing
body may approve the request,deny the request,or rh' d a d t nn nation
that the proposed nt warrants additional review. if it is
detennined that additional review s necessary,the following procedures
r
shall he followed by the CfTY and COUNTY:
a. If inconsistencies Noted by both parties cannot he resolved in the
review ss as outlined in Section IV(3),the CITY and the
COUNTY may agree to initiate a joint study. Such a study shall
continenceithl days of the date it is determined that o
proposed ont creatcs aninconsistency,and shall be
completed in 90 days of said date. Methodologies and
procedures regulatingthe conduct of tlroo* t study shall leo
mutually agreed upon by the CITY and the County prior to
commencing the study.
b. Vpon completion of the joint study,the study and the
recommendations dmw from it shall bo included thin the record
l give caroful consideration to the study prior to mAing a final
decision.
99
tr �an r o f � s .
.-f--
akge—f Proposed adcritions
a Proposed deletions
Ordinance 614
Exhibit
July 16,
Page 12 of 16
�dd �rl + ttlfn,w
" th ° 'M andL
sn gni e n
nfd- . .-
C1 , The p i will jointly review Agreement r3 two t s to evaluate the
effectiveness f(be processes set f rthr herein and to make any amendments.
review process shall commence two 2 years from the date of execution and shall
be completed within 6digs. Both parties shall make a good fifth effort to
resolve,inconsistencies that may have developed since the previous review. If,
after completion oft -day review period n t t ' till remain,either
party may terminate this Agrectuent.
ll b irr ti d t all pit 1 in area a ents.s
tl dtr � ha i s d nitiatta t t ve occurredsince 1988.
" t shrill become effectiv- nn fn13
tint tl � l h d 11 then real *nil r l the
lain + t `l"i Mrd l�lr 'nAummmt datedtrr 2 1 ,
� tier dt �h"ttai t dill l� thr last date f'si ata. nh� att
IN
WITNFSS WHEREOF the parties v this Urban Planning
Agreement on the date set opposite their signatures,
Cr" IG
mDate:42-44,U
ppkq.ved as to F .
11
"
1y Attorney
proposed additions
ProPosed del t n
Ordinance 014
F-xhibk
July 15,2003
'age 13 of 16
WASHINGTON COUNTY
mm Rafe,
Ces a r,Board of County C o ie oer
rt fa
By—_--- a e- 2�
ec rdin ecrefary
f Proposed additions
ObGM Proposed deletions
Ordk,onoe 614
taib#
my is,2003
Page 14 of 16
Delete Exhibit,A of,the Washington County—Tigard Urban Planning Area Agreement
commenced on December 1 , 1988 as shown bel
*p
t
,
y
$ � � ��i Ik yy l� riM �ro x tl www tAkwAk
ix�mf
A A
# +Ilk,
0 "
Z
µ 4i
CO
a !• .. «�
�TM
A,!
Proposed;additions
abo(W Proposed deletions
Ordinance 614
xlt
July16 2003
19 of 1
H
Ef
Ate.
a
s
a
p ,
e
F °
� a�a
W Y �
�, umww � 4WM4, r
:. K5
c t�4
t
r
CL ,+
n.
72 i
9
0 w
CI
e
w
<T!
F—C:
s
JOR
Ordinance e
Exhibk
My 15,2003
Page of 16
This map remains unchanged "Ex ibit "of the Washington County Tigard Urban area
Planning Agreement
ti
F
u
„ n
M
r
„u
"
,
a�
"
,
q
' n
bit PrOPOsed addition