Loading...
Resolution No. 01-39 CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON RESOLUTION NO.01-3g A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE OREGON ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR A LOAN TO FINANCE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COOK PARK MASTER PLAN AND DECLARING THE CITY'S INTENT TO REIMBURSE ITSELF FOR EXPENSES INCURRED PRIOR TO LOAN AWARD. WHEREAS, the City of Tigard has developed a master plan for Cook Park improvements following a public involvement process,and WHEREAS, Cook Park improvements are paid for out of the City's Parks System Development Charge (SDC)revenues,which are limited,and WHEREAS,the City has been installing improvements on a cash-available basis,and WHEREAS,the Master Plan has four additional phases at a total cost of$2.5 million,and WHEREAS,the Oregon Economic and Community Development Department(OECDD)offers a low cost loan program that would finance this project over a five to ten year period,and WHEREAS,under the OECDD program,OECDD would provide funds from bonds to be sold in the late summer or fall of 2001 to complete the project and the City would repay the loan using Parks SDC revenues,with a back-up pledge of the City's General Fund. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The City of Tigard shall submit an application to OECDD, in substantially the form shown in Attachment A to this resolution, to finance the Cook Park Master Plan improvements over a five to ten year period. SECTION 2: The City Council declares the intent of the City of Tigard to reimbursement itself from the proceeds of the OECDD loan for expenses incurred on the project prior to the date of the loan award,to the extent allowed by law and State regulations. SECTION 3: The Finance Director is hereby authorized to sign the application and to make all representations and declarations necessary to successfully obtain this loan. PASSED: This a�0dayof t i _2001. CIO rayortCifY0&d A EST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO.Ol Page 1 Attachment A APPLICATION OFFICE USE ONLY: Needs and issues No. Priority: All application forms are available Concept No. on disk or e-mail upon request Safe Drinking Water Letter of Interest No. pplication Complete Date Oregon Economic and Community Development Department 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 200 (503)986-0123 Salem,OR 97301-1280 (800)233-3306 APPLICANT INFORMATION: Applicant:City of Tigard Contact:Craig Prosser,Finance Director Address:13125 SW Hall Blvd Address-_ Tigard,Oregon 97223 Phone:503-639-4171 Phone:503-639-4171 ext.345 Fax: Fax:503-639-1471 E-Mail: E-Mail:craig@ci.tigard.or.us PROJECT TITLE: Cook Park Developrreent PROGRAM(S)BEING APPLIED FOR: Old Growth Diversification Fund Competitive Community Assistzzce X Safe Drinking Water Revolving Loan Fund Port Planning and Marketing Fund Water/Wastewater Financing Program Community Development Block Grant Special Public Works Fund FUNDS REQUESTED AND PROJt,CT COSTS: $ 2,540,248Tota1 Project Cost $ OApplicant's Participation $ OBenefited Properm, $ OOther Funds: $ 2,540,248AmountRequested Application (Revised January 2001) Page 1 W1 rg. CERTIFICATION: I certify that, to the best of my knowledge: 1) all information contained in this application and the attached supplements, if any, is valid and accurate; 2) the submission of this application has been authorized by the governing body of the undersigned jurisdiction using its local process; and 3) if funding is received,we will comply with all federal and state requirements that apply to the use of the requested funds. Signature Title Name Craig Prosser DateJune 12,2001 (Type or print,highest elected or other authorized official) Instructions>- Complete all'sections-below If:items-1;,2;3-and/6r�4:are;ahteady'described ih:an;. engineering or other study,a copy of the;study can be.:attached to-iesponse;4o these questions. If so, ,;please indicate below the question,the.name of,the_",y-and thg:page number in the study.where the: requested information can be found. PROTECT INFORMATION 1.Backeround/Need. Briefly identify the problem(s)you are trying to solve and their effects on current residents of your jurisdiction or the project area. The answer should indicate how the project is in the public interest. 2.Pronosed Solution. Summarize the project that you expect to carry out. 3. nlicant Capacity. Identify who will be administering the project and their experience with similar projects. Describe the selection process that will be used to procure personal services from independent contractors(e.g.,professional registered engineers/licensed architects). 4.0wrershio What jurisdiction(s)will own,operate and/or maintain the proposed infrastructure? Own:City of Tigard Operate:City of Tigard Maintain:City of Tigard LAND USE INFORMATION nstructions,:-Complete this section if_the project involves.real prop Monstruction,or planning for.real property construction. 5.Consistency with Comprehensive Land Use Plan Location of project service area(i.e. the area where the primary beneficiaries are located): Check all that apply X Inside city limits of City of Tigard Oregon Outside city limits,but within the urban growth boundary of the city of Unincorporated area of the county approved for urban development under Goal 11:Public Facilities and Scrvices of the State Planning Goal in compliance with the applicable requirements of Chapter 660 of the Oregon Administrative Rules, Division I I (Public Facilities Planning), Division 4(Goal 2 Exception Process)and Division 22(Unincorporated Communities). Application (Revised January 2001) Page 2 For projects outside of urban growth boundaries only: Name of the area in the county's Comprehensive Plan: Unincorporated Area type: "Exception"area allowed by State Planning Goals Urban Unincorporated Community Rural Community Rural Service Center Proiect is consistent with land-use plan Land-use plan consistency does not apply.Explain: PROJECT COST SUMMARY: Complete this table or attach a detailed'suoolemental budget Other Public Benefited Proiect Total or engineering estimate that identifies all protect costs. Funds• Proaertlest Private Investments" Proiect Activities Funds Rg nested Land Acquisition.Clearance.Disposition $0 Water System Improvements $25,110 Sanitary Sewer Improvements $13,847 Storm Drainage Improvements $144,542 Public Facilities-Streets $0 Public Facilities-Roads $100,018 Public Facilities-Bridges $0 Public Facilities-Sidewalks $0 Public Facilities-Ports $0 Public Facilities-Railroads $0 Public Facilities-Airports $0 Public/Community Facilities(Buildings) $1,048,876 Relocation Assistance $0 Legal $0 Engineering/Architectural $0 Construction Contingencies $323,220 All Administration $0 Application (Revised January 2001) Page 3 Other(specify) Parkino lots $553,940 Park facilities(fields.restrooms. $330,695 con essions Irrigation.etc. Total Protect $2,540,248 Other Public Funds' Loan Terms (Years and Interest Rate) Source Amount Total Other Public Funds Private Funds— Activity Source Amount Public Infrastructure 0 Private Infrastructure 0 Access Roads Sewer Collectors etc. Buildings 0 Other(specify) 0 Total Private Investment 0 6.Population of the Entire Service Area(City,Sanitary Service District,Water District,etc.) 42,260 7.Anticipated Project Schedule: Start Date Completion Date Planning Completed/Phase I Property Acquisition,if any Completed/Phase I Final Engineering/Design Completed/Phase I Bid Advertisement June 5,2001 Award Contract June 26,2001 June 26,2001 Construction July 9,2001 October 31,2001 Ant ici ated number of months for construction: 4 SALMON QUESTIONNAIRE: Salmon Questions 8.Is the Project site located in a wetland? (Provide cony of National Wetland Yes X No Inventory map or approved Local Wetland Inventory may with site outlined.) Application (Revised January 2001) Page 4 9.Will the Project require fill,removal,alteration of any soil or gravels? Yes X No If so,describe the action and amount of area affected. IO.Is the proiect site iocated adjoining or adjacent to an"essential indigenous anadromous Yes X No habitat"? (See Division of State Lands web site for maps.)' httv://statelands.dsl.state.or.us/counties.htm No_ 11.Will the project involve any excavation,fill,vegetation removal or Yes _ No X building of any structures in or near a stream bank? If so,describe. 12.1s the project adjacent to a Department of Environmental Quality water quality Yes_X No— limited stream? (See Department of Environmental Quality web site for maps.) htto://watergualitv.deg.state.or.us/WOLData/SearchChoice98.htm 13.Will there be storm water runoff from the project site? Yes X_ No—' If so,explain how it will be managed. Water will be treated in a water quality Swale and then piped to the river. 14.Will the project require the extension or construction of roads adjacent to streams or Yes X No within wetlands and floodplains? If so,describe. Emergency access road. Habitat Improvement Questions Describe what could be done to enhance the project's compatibility with streams or wetlands in or near the project area? For example: 15.Could the project contribute to in-stream flows or improve water quality? Yes No X If so,describe. 16.Can vegetation near streams be restored or replaced in conjunction with the Yes No X project? If so,describe. 17.Can woody debris or other fish habitat enhancement elements be introduced into the Yes No X adjacent stream in conjunction with the project? If so,describe. _ 18.Can the project incorporate elements to restore fish passage at an existing artificial Yes No X barrier? If so,describe. No existing barrier near project 19.Can storm water be collected, retained, and/or dissipated into a wetland catchment in Yes No7 X order to prevent direct discharge into the adjacent stream? _ ' If so,describe how this will be accomplished. i 1 'Essential indigenous anadromous salmonid habitat is habitat necessary to prevent the depletion of native salmon species during their life history stages of spawning and rearing. Application (Revised January 2001) Page 5 20. Consulting Professionals Contributing to the Project(if known): Engineer/Architect:Consulting Engineering Services/North West Address:15573 SW Bangy Rd.Suite 300 Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 E-mail address:www.cesnw.com Fax: 503-968-2595 Contact Name:Tony Weller Phone: 503-968-6655 Contact Title:Vice President Project Administrator: Address: E-mail address: Fax: Contact Name: Phone: Contact Title: Legal Counsel: Address: E-mail address: Fax: Contact Name: Phone: Contact Title: Regulatory Contact: Contact Name: Phone: Contact Title: 21.Check with appropriate regulatory agency for possible permits required and note whether any of these permits are necessary and whether or not they have been Necessary? Issued? issued. Division of State Lands Removal/Fill permit- Yes X No Yes X No (503)378-3805 U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permit- Yes X No Yes X No (503)326-6995 _ ® Department of Environmental Quality National Yes X No Yes X No Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit-Regional Department of Environmental Quality Office _ i Application (Revised January 2001) Page 6 22.Legal name of entity to be contracted with: Entity type: Limited Liability Company or Partnership Partnership Limited Partnership Sole Proprietorship `Corporation Professional Corporation Municipal Government Other Address: E-mail address: Fax: Contact Name: Phone: Contact Title: Finn's Federal Tax identification Number: Typed name of person authorized to negotiate contracts: Typed name of person authorized to sign contracts: ATTACHMENTS TO THE APPLICATION: I7se'check marks to.indicate that r"equu�edzitem..areI'-" ed�Onexset iu]f4attachmenyts�s snfficaent ._�......� a Required Rttaahinent to the app@eatiarl _ Needed Attaehed? LandjUse;Compatibility,Statement or,s3mdaG,rdocumentatrdn tHatproOect is Consistent Yes X ;witha"lic8bia:land use tans and re°rilabon`s D,etaded project,cost estimates suppla nerital�b adget z � s 3 Yes 4 r One copy;of applicants three most recenigaudd reparts ar?dicurrrent budget, iF not Yes X aireadn.file withEthe t]e artment Maps showing,the°;general location of,the project tax lotsor parcels in 00 roject Yes X area,:andfha s ecitic location of the; 0FFICE USE.QNLYe Must send apPlic rt n an tam S sp @tLt ,pE►i i «?, PTo)gdt'tYpe � � p�� �FP�entar�s' �,`�at2 Y+oa.orc� Gastnftetitl e:Community itlssistanee t " r } � X � Port planning and M, r > CD�r t�S funds s, C.L?8G OH-Site infreS 41 F'u41i Works fog ! Housings GDBG .Public Work"s Pianning Design`and/or;Gogstr Public Works SDWRLF Technical zassIstance WM1 D'esigmand Co[Is#ruction SPWF Technical Assistance SPWF Planning Design and/or Construction Si�WF _Communrty'FaciiiGes� Water"rSeWar Rbads etc � SPWF-Community Facilities all other types Comm�friiij+Facilities CDBG=Community Facilities, Plannigg Desigr andlor. Construction - i w Application (Revised January 2001) Page 8 COMMUNITY FACILITIES PROJECTS APPLICATIONSUPPLEMENT Community Development Block Grant Special Public Works Fund-Community Facilities-all other types Part A tractions;:C4tnglete-Pa*t:tifor all"pmaects:�' <. The Need for the Project must address, 1.Provide details about the specific community development problem,its severity and extent. Cook Park is a valuable and attractive resource located in the heart of the rapidly growing westside area of the Portland SMSA. Its 79 acres include both natural and developed areas. Facilities located in the developed areas include two baseball and three soccer fields,an outdoor basketball court,picnic areas,three covered shelters,a children's play area,horseshoe pits,a boat ramp,a floating dock,and large open areas. Along with many other major community and regional events,Cook Park is the site of the Rose Festival Balloon Festival, which annually draws some 100,000 visitors to the park. The problem that led to the selection of the proposed project is that Cook Park's existing recreational areas and facilities are not sufficient to meet public demand. According to estimates,approximately 150,000 individual visits were made to the park in 1999. The shortage of group reservation areas and sports fields is suggestive of the demand supply problem. The demand is so great that the majority,if not all,of the available picnic and ball field slots for the season are taken the first day that reservations are accepted. As a result,an undocumented but very large number of public and private groups wishing to reserve picnic areas and sport fields have to be turned away each year because of lack of openings. Another problem is off-street parking. According to a recent study, the park's existing 184 parking spaces provide approximately 69% of the estimated number of spaces needed to service the park's existing facilities. A third major problem is emergency access. The existing park is served by one two-lane road. During peak use periods,the road is clogged by traffic. An alternate access into the park is needed in order to ensure that emergency vehicles can respond to health or safety emergencies in a timely manner. 2.Describe the persons affected and where they currently receive the services that are needed. Affected persons include all of the residents of the City of Tigard and surrounding communities. The southwest portion of the Portland metropolitan area has few(if any)other regional park facilities. This lack contributes to a very high usage of Cook Park,which strains existing capacity. Citizens of the area are either forced to do without the amenities and activities offered by a regional park, or they are forced to travel long distances to parks in other parts of the metropolitan region. i Community Facilities Application Supplement (Revised January 2001) Page 1 Proposed Solution: I.Describe how the proposed project will address the identified need. In an effort to solve the identified problems,the City has acquired 21-acre and 7-acre properties bordering the existing park boundary and developed a master plan,with public involvement,to upgrade and expand the park. A proposed new parking tot is designed to serve the parking needs of major events,such as the Rose Festival Balloon Festival and the 4`s of July Celebration. The new area will lessen the need for off-site parking and assist in keeping park-related parking off adjacent neighborhood streets. A one-lane emergency access road will provide an alternative route serving the park,should the existing road serving the park be jammed during a health or safely emergency. A proposed butterfly Darden will serve the aesthetic and leisure needs of park users. This and other natural area enhancements will add to the educational and research opportunities provided by Cook Park for the students of the nearby Tigard High. Other improvements to the expansion area are proposed to include a tot lot,picnic shelter,migratory bird viewing area,maintenance building,paved trails,and sports fields The proposed expansion and upgrade of the park will contribute to overall community livability and pride. It will help balance the impacts of growth and increasing density. In a time of increasing recreational demand and the growth youth sports participation, the expansion will provide more recreation opportunities. The primary users will be community, nearby,and regional residents seeking riparian leisure and recreational opportunities. 2.Describe the impact on the community if the facility is not funded. Tigard is park-deficient. If this facility is not funded and built, recreational and community event opportunities will continue to be severely limited. Citizens will have to travel longer distances to use parks provided by other jurisdictions,lessening community identity and pride, and contributing to increased traffic and pollution due to longer distances traveled. 3.Number of people to benefit from the project: 100,000(est.) 4.Describe why the proposed project cannot be completed without the requested funds. If other resources will be used,include evidence that they are either committed or will be available within 60 days of an award. I The Cook Park Master Plan is scheduled for completion on a cash-available basis,using Parks SDC revenues. This means that full implementation of the master plan will take three to four years. This adds to project costs due to inflation and prolongs disruption in the park due to construction. Implementation of the master plan also requires use of Rinds that would otherwise be available for acquisition,construction and development of neighborhood parks throughout Tigard. Community Facilities Application Supplement (Revised January 2001) Page 2 1 Part B gn'ppojects Engineering/Architectural Feasibility: 1.Provide an explanation for the basis for the size and/or capacity of the proposed facility. Describe project alternatives considered and a demonstration that the proposed project is cost effective. Provide detailed cost estimates including all items necessary to construct the project. Also include preliminary design drawings, maps showing the general location of the project, tax lots or parcels and the specific location of the project,including,if applicable,line sizes,road widths,etc. Design drawings and project estimates attached. 2.Attach final design plans,specifications and detailed cost estimates for the project. If final plans are not complete, submit preliminary drawings, specifications and cost estimates sufficient for an independent geologist, architect, or engineering consultant to confirm that the proposed facility project is appropriate for the identified need and that the anticipated cost is reasonable. Attached Financial Need: 1.Specify revenue sources available for loan repayment: Parks Systems Development Charge fees(with back up security of the City's General Fund) 2.Does the project involve the formation of a local improvement district(LID)? Yes No X Ifyes,provide details: 3.Are the benefited property owners participating in the cost of construction of the Yes No X publicly owned facilities? If yes,attach a list of the benefiting property owners and corresponding participation. Ifno,explain why: No LID is being formed S 4.Is other debt serviced or secured by the revenues pledged for this project? Yes No X i _ If yes,is it described in the applicant's audit reports? Yes— No Ifno,describe: There is no City debt secured by Parks SDC or General Funds Community Facilities Application Supplement (Revised.ianuary 2001) Page 3 5.Has the applicant ever defaulted on a debt? Yes No X If yes,provide a complete summary of all circumstances relative to the default: 6.Is there pending litigation that could impair applicant's ability to repay debt? Yes No X If yes,describe: 7.Summarize any pending litigation that may affect the ability of the applicant to repay a loan. None 8.List the five largest employers in the applicant's jurisdiction in the table below: If the information is in the Community Profiles(www.econ.state.or.us/comprof.htm)check here and do not complete this table. X ,Employer*(ten or more employees) Type of Business Number of Employees 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Estimated total employment in jurisdiction Data source: Year: This information can be obtained at the county assessor's office. The information for the above table can be provided in an alternate format provided by the county assessor's office. 9.List the ten largest property taxpayers(both businesses and residents)of the applicant's jurisdiction in the table below: If the information is in the Community Profiles,check here and do not complete this table. Community Facilities Application Supplement (Revised January 2001) Page 4 Taxpayer Type of Business Total Taxes Current (City of Tigard Assessed Value only) Pacific Realty Associates Oregon Business Park $292,958 $113,111,340 Washington Square,Inc. Regional shopping mall $216,407 $83,555,010 Knickerbocker Property,Inc. Lincoln Center Office Park $157,244 $60,712,100 XXIV GTE Northwest,Inc. Communications utility $119,218 $46,030,230 Spieker Properties Park 217 retail office center and $69,871 $26,977,160 Nelson Business Park Portland General Electric Electric utility $50,519 $19,505,400 Portland Hotel Associates Embassy Suites Hotel $50,401 $19,459,810 Robinson Trust Scholls Business Center $45,256 $17,473,240 The May Department Stores Co. Meier&Frank Department Store $42,199 $16,293,210 Sprint Spectrum Communications utility $41,958 $16,200,080 Total $1,086,031 $419,317,580 Data source*: City of Tigard,CAFR for year ended June 30,2000 Year: 2000 * This information can be obtained at the county assessor's office. The information for the above table can be provided in an alternate format provided by the county assessor's office. 10.Provide revenue projection in the table below: Community Facility Revenue Projection Project Title: Cook Park Development Annual Inflation Rate: NA Operating income Revenue Source Per Month X 12= First Five-Year Full Year Projection None X 12= 0 0 X 12= X12= X 12= X 12= Total Anticipated Gross Income X 12= Q 0 Community Facilities Application Supplement (Revised January 2001) Page 5 is I I.Provide community facility operating budget in the table below: Community Facility Operating Budget Project Title: Cook Park Annual Inflation Rate: 4% Operating Expenses First Full Year Five-Year Projection Insurance $0 $0 Utilities Gas/Oil 0 0 Electric 0 0 Water&Sewer 0 0 Garbage Removal 0 0 Other: 0 0 Repairs 2,100 20,000 General Maintenance 71,000 384,500 Landscape Maintenance 57,600 312,000 Replacement:Reserve 0 0 Property Management 0 O Office and Administration 15,325 83,000 Real Estate Taxes 0 0 Taxes(non-real estate) 0 0 Other: 0 0 Total Annual.Operating Expenses $146,025 $799,500 Net Operating Income i Less Debt _%on$ for years Service: _%on$ for years Total Debt Service 3 Cash Flow Per Year Community Facilities Application Supplement (Revised January 2001) Page 6 Attachments-Indicate that a11.attaehmonts are submittsd.wt±h`lhe up egtent." Needed - Attachod?.' Copies of any ordinances.which establish debt supported Vy the enterprise fund:pledged-for Yes Nore this project.. . Final en rcring/architectural designs and:specifics:ons.prepared and Stamped.by a Yes X registered'engineer/architect(ONE•SET,ONLY).and with evidence of regulatory agency approval if appropriate (Registered geologist-prepared documents:may work for;projects involving environmental actions)„ Copy of needed permits and/or licensesto construct the facility or,cleanup/remediate the Yes X site) Part C Part C'is,only to be completed by municipalities requesting.Community Development, Lock Grant finds. National Objcctive Documentation: 1.Low and Moderate Income - Complete the attached "Documentation of Facility Users" form, attached,for all projects qualifying under this national objective. ®Total number ofbenefited persons: ®Number of low-and moderate-income persons: ®%low and moderate income: ®Source of data: Census: Local Income Survey: or other survey methodology: ®Date of information: Is the project low and moderate income based upon the nature and/or location? Yes No If yes,describe the requirement that meets the national objective: 2.Slums and Blight: Spot Slum and Blight:Document the nature and extent of the slum or blight and the project's boundaries. Area Slum and Blight: Document the nature and extent of the slum or blight,applicant designation of slum and blight for the area,and the area boundaries. Local Priority Documentation: 1.Provide documentation that the project or the underlying need is included in a local,regional,or area plan,or on the"Needs and Issues Inventory." Citizen Participation: i I.Date required public hearing was held: 2.Location where citizens can review information about the applicant's Community Development Program: 3.Name of one or more organizations in your community that represents or acts as aadvocates for low-and moderate-income persons: Community Facilities Application Supplement (Revised January 2001) Page 7 4.Was Notice provided to this organization about the Public Hearing? Yes No When? How was the information provided?(letter etc.) 5.Was the community asked by groups representing lode-and moderate-income persons Yes No to provide technical assistance in developing project concepts that might be eligible for the Community Development Block Grant Program? 6.Is there a significant number of non-English speaking residents in the community? Yes No If yes,how were they notified about this public hearing? Property Acquisition:(Do not complete for Planning projects) i.Will the project involve the acquisition of real property or permanent easements Yes No with Community Development Block Grant or any other source of funds? _ 2.Will any property or permanent easements be donated for the project? Yes No 3.Have any actions already been taken to acquire real property or easements for the Yes No project? - If yes, describe what has been done and how the actions comply with the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act. 4.Who currently owns the project site? 5.Are there currently residential,business or nonprofit tenants in any structure that Yes No will be affected by the project? — If yes,identify who they are and what space they occupy. Anti-Displacement and Relocation: (Do not complete for Planning projects) 1.Will the project involve the demolition or conversion of a residential structure to Yes No another use?(e.g.,demolish a home to clear a site for a new community center) — If yes,answer the following: a. Is the structure currently occupied? Yes No b. Has the applicant discussed the federal requirements for one-for-one Yeo No i replacement of low/moderate income housing units and relocation benefits with Oregon Economic and Community Development Department staff? _ C. Have actions been taken to document compliance with federal rules Yes No governing one-for-one replacement and relocation such as documenting current j tenants, rents, and utility costs; providing written notice to tenants about the proposed project;and estimating the cost ofbenefits? y — 1 1 Community Facilities Application Supplement (Revised January 2001) Page 8 F Environmental; (]Do not complete for Planning projects) Early identification of potential environmental issues is important to ensure that the anticipated cost of a project is reasonable. Your answers to the following questions will help state staff provide appropriate technical assistance. Answer each of the following guestions. Attach a brief explanation for all"yes" answers. 1.Will the project involve property that is in the 100-year floodplain, the five- Yes No hundred-year floodplain,or an area that could be considered a wetland? 2.Will the project involve building on bare land or altering an existing building? Yes No If yes,also answer a through d below: a. Is the project site previously undisturbed ground? Yes No b. Is the project site in an established or proposed historic or conservation Yes No district? _ C. Is the project site/building listed in a local cultural resource inventory? Yes No d. Does the project involve a structure that is 50 years old or older? Yeo No 3.Is there,within the line of sight of the property,a tank that could or does contain an Yes No explosive or flammable substance? 4.Is the proposed project located within normal hearing distance of a highway, Yeo No freeway,railroad,or airfield? Community Facilities Application Supplement (Revised January 2001) Page 9 Community Facilities Application Supplement (Revised January 2001) Page 10 ) k \ § E § 7 ma / � § { \kd \ƒ= � 2 � ■ m § _»� Z �\ k -E . s \ . \ \ � d � \ / ] / d \ \ � \ § / \ § ) \ ) ] 2 m ] 4oS § 3 § ` \ _ ) r a ( cn ft \ ; © A - � § § ~ ` Cl. § e G