Resolution No. 00-66 . v
CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON
RESOLUTION NO.00- (0(10
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY OF TIGARD WATER SERVICE AREA SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT CHARGE AND THE METHODOLOGY USED TO ESTABLISH THE CHARGES
WHEREAS, Tigard Municipal code chapter 3.24 defines the authority and process for imposing Water
System Development Charges(SDCs);
` HIEREAS,Section S.B of the Intergovernmental Agreement for water within the Tigard Water Service
Area states that Tigard City Council has the authority to modify, alter or repeal the rules, rates and
regulations for water service within the Tigard Water Service Area;
WHEREAS,The Intergovernmental Water Board(IWB)has recommended approval of the Tigard Water
Service Area SDCs;
WHEREAS,The purpose of the Water SDC is to ensure fair and equitable financing is available to support
needed capital additions;
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
SECTION 1: The water system development charge for new connections by meter size based on a
5/8" x 3/4"meter having a weighting factor of one equivalent dwelling unit shall be
amended as follows:
Meter Size 410 service area Bull Mountain system
5/8"x 3/4" $2,041 $2,763
1" 5,103 6,908
1 1/2" 7,348 9,947
2" 16,328 22,104
3" 30,615 41,445
4" 51,025 69,075
6" 102,050 138,150
1 8" 163,280 221,040
10" 293,496 397,319
12" 775,907 1,050,382
SECTION'2: The methodology used to establish the above system development charges,which is
attached as Exhibit"A",is also hereby adopted.
SECTION 3: The capital improvement plan required by state law as the basis for expending SDC
revenue for water capital improvements shall be based upon the attached Exhibit`B",
which was recommended by the IWB, approved by City Council on September 26,
2000,and is also hereby adopted.
RESOLUTION NO.00-
Page 1
SECTION 4: This level of SDC also supports the$40,000,000 water supply source program that was
adopted by Council or,November 14,2000.
SECTION 5: The City Council determines that the amended SDC fee schedule is not a tax subject to
the property tax limitations of Article XI,Section 11 (b)of the Oregon Constitution.
PASSED: This a _ day of ✓ 2000.
ayor-City o Tig d
ATTEST:
City Recorder-City of Tigard
h:`dccs\sdc\sdc resolution 2000.do
I
i
i
f
RESOLUTION NO.00-A6
Page 2
x1-ll��T "A"
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM CH2MHILL
Tigard Water System System Development Charge
Update
PREPARED FOR: Mike Miller,City of Tigard
PREPARED 8Y: Art Griffith,CH2M HILL
COPIES: Ed Wegner,City of Tigard
Craig Prosser,City of Tigard
DAM September 1,2000
Introduction
The City of Tigard has authorized CH2M HILL to complete a System Development Charge
(SDC)Update for the Tigard water system.The existing SDC was developed in 1996 and
since that time,the City has continued planning for a long-term water source of supply
project,has constructed additional storage facilities,and has completed a water system
hydraulic analysis which has developed revised proposed capital improvements.
The Tigard water system serves areas inside the Cities of Tigard,King City,and Durham,
and also serves portions of unincorporated Washington County.Currently,the system
serves approximately 15,000 customers.The majority of the system's water supply is
currently purchased from the City of Portland,with additional production from tai---lystem
wells and additional wat r purchase from the City of Lake Oswego and the Tualatin Valley
Water District.For the definition of rates and SDCs the system is divided into the lower 410
pressure zone and the higher Bull Mountain area.The Bull Mountain area includes the 550
idgh pressure and gravity pressure zones,and the 713 high pressure and gravity pressure
zones.Separate rates and SDCs are maintained for the Bull Mountain area because of the
additional pumping expense and system facilities required to serve the higher elevations.
Table 1 summarizes the existing System Development Charge,including the reimbursement
fee and improvement fee,but not including any installation charge.
1
,
,
,
i
SEPT 12000 SDC FINAL REPOW.DOC t
TIGARD WATER SYSTEM SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE UPDATE
TABLET
Tigard Water Service Area Existing System Development Charge Schedule
Meter Size 410 Zone Bull Mountain Area
5/8—'/4 Inch $986 $1,507
1—Inch $1,972 -$3,014
1;§-Inch $4,930 $7,535
2—Inch $7,888 $12,056
3—Inch $15,776 $24,112
4—Inch $24,650 $37,675
6—Inch $49,300 $75,350
8—Inch $78,880 - $120,560
10—Inch $113,390 $173,305
Legislative Considerations
In 1989,the State of Oregon enacted legislation that authorizes local governments to define
and assess SDC and the legislation also places limits on the ways revenues generated
through SDCs can be used.A copy of ORS 223.297-314 is included in the Appendix of this
Memorandum.A SDC is defined in ORS 223.299,and is an amount charged to a new user at
the time of connection to the water system in excess of the cost of inspecting and installing
the connection.The SLC does not include fees assessed or collected through local
improvement districts.Tl:e statute further breaks down the SDC into an improvement fee
and a reimbursement fee.The improvement fee is a fee for the cost of capital expansions to
be constructed.The reimbursement fees a fee for the costs of capital improvements already
constructed or under construction.
ORS Chapter 223 specifies that the reimbursement fee must be established by an ordinance
or resolution that sets forth the methodology that will be used to calculate the charge.It
{ further specifies that the methodology must consider the cost of existing facilities,prior
contributions by existing users,the value of unused capacity,ratemaking principles
a employed to finance the capital improvements,and other relevant factors.The objective of
the methodology must be that future system users contribute no more than an equitable
share of the cost of existing facilities.
The improvement fee methodology must also be specified in an ordinance or resolution that
considers the cost of projected capital improvements needed to increase the capacity of the
system.ORS Chapter 223 further requires that a credit be provided for the construction of
qualified public improvements(contributions).A qualified public improvement is one
required as a condition of residential development approval,identified in the system's
SEPT 12000 SDC FINAL REPORT.DOC 2
7r.ARD WATER SYS: CHARGE UPDATE
capital improvement program,and either(i)not located on or contiguous to the property
being developed or(ii)located on or contiguous to the property being developed but
required to be built larger than necessary to serve the property being developed.
Revenues generated through the reimbursement fees must be spent only on capital
improvements to the system or repayment of debt on those improvements.Revenues
generated through the improvement fees are dedicated to capacity increasing capital
improvements or repayment of debt on capacity increasing capital improvement.An
increase in capacity is established if the improvements increase the level of performance or
service provided by existing facilities or provide new facilities.The portion of such
improvements funded by improvement fees must be related to current or projected
development.
Other provisions of ORS Chapter 223 require that:
. A local government implementing an SDC must develop a capital improvement plan
(CIP)or other comparable plan that lists the improvements that may be funded with
improvement fee revenues and the estimated timing and cost for each improvement.
Any capital improvement being funded wholly or in part with SDC revenues shat'be
included in the plan adopted by the local government.
• SDC revenues must be deposited into dedicated accounts,and local government must
provide an annual accounting of revenues and expenditures.
• Local government must provide for an administrative appeal procedure whereby a
citizen or other interested party may challenge an expenditure of SDC revenues.
. No legal action challenging the methodology used to calculate SDCs may be filed after
60 days from the enactment of or revision to the SDC.
• The provisions of ORS 223.297 to 223.314 are not applicable if they impair the local
govemmenes bond obligations or the ability of the local government to issue new bonds
or other financing.
Proposed Capital Improvements
Capital improvements are identified in the City of Tigard Water Distribution System
y Hydraulic Study(2000 Hydraulic Study)prepared by Murray,Smith&Associates,Inc.ALT
y capital projects identified in the 2000 Hydraulic Study are incorporated into this SDC except
j demolition projects,Aquifer Storage and Recovery studies,and water main replacement
projects.These three types of projects are not,for the purposes of this SDC analysis,defined
y as capacity-increasing projects.
A$40 million water supply project has been identified by the City,which will provide a
7 long-term water source owned by the City.This water supply project would provide an
estimated 20.0 mgd of water on a maximum day basis to the Tigard water service area.Debt
financing is projected,with three annual interest-only payments followed by levelized
principal and interest payments over the subsequent 22 years at a 60/6 interest rate.Debt
issuance costs include a capitalized bond reserve estimated at 8.7%of bond proceeds and
other costs of issuance estimated at 2.0%of bond proceeds.
SEPT VOW SDC FINAL REPORT.DOC 3
TICARV WATER SYSTEM SYSTEM DEYELOPMEH't CHA%E UPDATE
Prior to adoption of this SDC,state law requires that the City adopt a Capital Improvement
Plan that contains the proposed capital projects that form the basis of the SDC.
Methodology Used To Calculate SDS'
The SOC is comprised of a reimbursement fee and improvement fee.The reimbursement fee
is intended to recover the costs associated with the growth-related(or available)capai—zy in
the existing system,and the improvement fee is based on the costs of capacity-increasing
future improvements needed to meet the demands of growth.
Equivalent Dwelling Units
Equivalent Dwelling Unit(EDU)data was calculated from information contained in the
City's May 2000 Water Distribution System Hydraulic Study(2000 Hydraulic Study)and
current meter size data provided by the City of Tigard.Table 2 summarizes March 2000
meter data provided by the City,showing 21,465 meter equivalents system wide.
Table 5-1 of the May 2000 Water Distribution System Hydraulic Study reports a projected
2000 peak day demand of 13.84 mgd.Dividing the 2000 maxianurt day demand by the
existing 21,465 meter equivalents results in a maximum day demand of 645 gpd per meter
e „iyaIPnt,Throughout this analysis,an EDU is defined as a water system connection with
q�
a 5/8 x 3/4-inch meter with a maximum day water consumption of 645 gpd.
TABLE 2
Meter Equivalent Data as of March 2004
Meter Size March 2000 Number Meter Equivalent Number of Meter
of Meters Factor Equivalents
5/8—V4 Inch 12,975 1.0 12,975
1—Inch 1,190 2.5 2,975
1 Ds-Inch 365 3.6 1,314
2—inch 314 8 2,512
3—Inch 19 15 285
4—Inch 6 25 150
6—Inch 5 50 250
+ 8—Inch 6 80 480
a
10—Inch 1 140 144
12-Inch 1 380 380
T Total Number of Meter Equivalents 21,465
SEPT 1 2000 SOC FINAL REPORTAOC 4
TIGARD WATER SYSTEM SYSIEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE UPDATE
System Capacity
The 2000 Hydraulic Study estimated water system demands for each water system pressure
zone at existing demands and at saturation for a hater service area that encompass--.the
existing Tigard water service arca and Urban Reserves 47,48,and 49.The saturation
analysis was based on planning data provided by the City of Tigard,and projects an
increase of service area population from a current estimate of 46,144 to a saturation estimate
of 85,147.
For the 410 Zone,the existing maximum day demand is an estimated 7.80 mgd,and the
projected saturation maximum day demand i.:16.17 mgd.The projected increase in system
capacity in the 410 Zone,measured by maximum day demand,is 8.37 mgd.For the Bull
Mountain area,the existing maximum day demand is an estimated 6.04 mgd,and the
projected saturation maximum day demand is 11.93 mgd.The projected increase in system
capacity in the Bull Mountain area,measured by maximum day demand,is 189 mgd.
Water system growth rates projected in the 2000 Hydraulic Study are based or-,population
projections provided by Metro and include an annual 1.2%growth rate.
Reimbursement Fee
The general methodology used to develop the reimbursement fee includes the following
four steps:
1. Determine the value of growth-related capacity
2. Define system capacity
3. Calculate the unit cost of growth—related capacity
4. Develop reimbursement fee per EDU
The valve of growth-related capacity in this analysis is based on the non-
-ontributed depreciated plant investment.The existing plant investment used in the 1996
SDC calculation was used as the basis for the es,!mate,!current plan xnve -:mt.
Adjustments from the 1996 plant investment include estimated depreciation between 1996
and 2000,addition of facilities(i.e.the Menlor Reservoir)completed since 1996,and addition
of existing capital reserves.Table 3 shows the derivation of the reimbursement fee.
including the derivation of the net system investment of$24,370,445.
The system capacity,described above,is the estimated saturation maximum day demand of
28.1 mgd.Use of saturation maximum day demand as a measure of system capacity is a
change from the existing methodology,where the existing system capacity is used.Dividing
the net system investment by the system capacity results in the vnit cost o°growth-related
capacity of$867,276 per mgd of system capacity.
To determine the reimbT?rsement fee per EDU,the net investment per unit of system
capacity is multiplied by the estimated capacity requirements,645 gpd,of"i EDU.The
1 resulting improvement`ee is$561 per EDU.
SEPT 12CCO SDC FINAL REPORT-DOC 5
Table 3
Reimbursement Fee Calculation
Item Total
1996 Rate Study Fixed Asset Value(.s of 6/30/95) $14,261,700
Less Estimated Depreciation(1996-2000) ($1,457,359)
Plus Assets Constructed Sinre 6/30/95
Menlo.-Rczcrvoir,Original Cost Less Deprec. $3,616,104
Subtotal $16,420,445
Less:Current Outstanding Debt Principal(a) $0
Plus:Current Cash Reserves(a) $7,950,000
Net System Investment $24,370,445
Saturation System Wide System Capacity,n;gd 28.1
Net Investment per mgd $867,276
Net Investment per gpd $0.87
Maximum Day Water Demand(gpd)(c) 645
Reimbursement SDC perEDU $561
Notes:
(a)Projected 6/30/00 reserve balance in water funds
(b) Estimated saturated system wide maximum day demand
i (c) Estimated 2000 max day demand divided by the number of 2000
system-wide meter equivalents
a
i
i
September 1.MM
CNQm K L Inc.
TIGARD WATER SYSTEM SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE UPDATE
Ianprovement Fee
The general methodology used to develop the improvement fee is similar to that for the
reimbursement fee,and includes the following four steps:
1. Determine the costs ofgrowth-rel--ted improvements
2. Calculate the unit cost of additional capacity
3. Calculate debt service credit
4. Develop reimbursement fee per EDU
Cost of Growth-Related Improvements
Capacity-increasing project costs were identified in a Draft City of Tigard Distribution
System Hydraulic Study Financial Plan Technical Assistance memorandum(2000 Technical
Memorandum)prepared by Murray,Smith&Associates,Inc,a copy of which is included in
the Appendix.The 2000 Technical Memorandum identifies allocations of project costs to the
410 Zone and the Bull Mountain area and allocations of project costs to existing capacity and
future capacity.The allocations between existing capacity and future capacity are generally
based on the ratio of existing to saturation maximum day demand in the area benefiting
from the project.Projects required to serve the Urban Reserves are allocated entirely to
growth.The City's water main oversizing program was allocated between existing and
future capacity by C142M HILL based on the ration of system wide existing and saturation
maximum day demand.Table 4 shows,for each distribution system project included in the
SDC,the project cost in 2000 dollars and the allocations of project costs between 410 and
Bull Mountain areas and between existing and future capacity.Use of 2000 dollars is a
change from the current methodology,where an inflation-adjusted cost was used.This
change was made because of the long-term i...cure of the capital improvement plan that is
based on a saturation analysis and a capital improvement plan schedule covering over
twenty years.
The City is pursuing the feasibility of a number of potential options for securing a
guaranteed long-term water supply.For the water supply project,the derivation of the
capacity increasing project cost is defi*,ed by the fptt ..,._.o Seri—cf
• Define the project cost,estimated at$40,000,000 and the amount($3,900,000)expected to
be funded from existing Tigard water system capital reserves.The remaining
$36,100,000 would be funded by debt issuance.
• Estimate the costs of debt financing,including the capitalized bond reserve and costs of
n debt issuance for the bond issue that would supply$36,100,000 of bond proceeds for the
" water supply project.The estimated financing costs are$4,325,500,for a total project cost
of$44,325,500.
• Calculate the proportion of the water supply project to be allocated to future capacity
The 20.0 mgd water supply project would supply the existing maximum day demand of
13.84 mgd plus an additional 6.16 mgd.30.8%of the water supply project is allocated to
growth(30.8%=6.16/20).
SEPT 12000 SDC FINAL REPORT.DOC 6
TaNc 4
Distribotin SYslem Capin)hrworemnas Incorporated Into SDC
Pertrnt Pacest Proj-Curt All-d to All]acned to
Allocaedto Alt-un>d 10 Allocated to 410Z- Bull Mm.
PROJECT TOTAL New User Bull Mountain 410 Zorn Ncw User New Users
Rtgrvoln 6t Smrag<:
55OZne Rexrvoir No.1 2.950.000 583% IOD% 0 0 1,725.000
550Zne Rex rvoir No.2 4200.000 583% 100% 0 0 2,457.000
410 Zane Reservoir Na.3 2.400.000 49.7% 0% 2.400.000 1,192.800 0
713 Zane Reservoir No.4 2,400,000 19.9% IOM% 0 0 476,700
Reservoir Evaluatin Pmgrmn 130,000 50.0% 50% 65.000 32.500 32500
Sudad-Reservobs R St 512.080.000 52.465.000 SI.225300 34.691.2ts0
Transmission.Disnibution.$Pump Statiom:
Melva Px�.p Stad-(550 Zoa) 675.000 585% 1006 0 0 394.875
Transfer Pump Satin(550/)13 Zone) 2,100,000 44.0% 100% 0 0 924.000
M8h Tor Pump Sndn(7 13 Z m) 750,000 23.1% 100% 0 0 173.250
Pump Satin No.2 Uppadc(410 rad 510/1 13 Z-) 400.000 47.4% 41% 236010 111.77] V.675SW Wa uut Street lsspu-nls 681,000 49.7% 0% 681,000 338.457 0
Z1-Main:Walnut Street.121st to Ban-- 1368000 49.7% O% 1,368,000 679,896 0
R-.Read Warn Main 301 000 49.7% 0% 304,000 151064 0
Sin No.I Piping InVmvemcnts 200,000 49.7% 0%� 200,000 99.40 il
Site No.4 Piping inpmvemcnn 300.000 49.7'!: 0% 300.000 149.100 0
24'M in:Beef Beud Road and Pwi0c Highway 1.754.000 49.7% 0% 1,254,000 623.238 0
Nash 121st Avenue Upgrade 513.000 49.7% 0% 513AOO 254,961 0
SW Lincoln Street 60,000 49.]% 0% 60.000 29,820 0
SW Bumharn S-1 334,000 49.]% O% 334.000 165.W 0
F"410Zuns Upgrd 1,109,600 49.7% 096 1,109.600 551.471 0
SW Barrows Road 228,000 49.7% 0% 228,(00 113,316 0
SW King Richard Drive 68.000 49.7% 0% 68000 33.796 0
SW 93r1/SW 92.d Avenues 399.000 49.7% M% 399.000 198303 0
SW Fairtnvcn 421.800 49.7% O% 421.800 209.635 0
SWK-n/SW 1251h Avenue 127,500 49.7% 0% 127300 63368 0
410 Reservoir No.5 Supply 380.000 49.7% 0 00% 380,0 188,860 0
King City U+C Reserve 344500 100% 0% 344,500 344500 0
Weu Urban It- 1.748.00D 100% 096 1.748000 1.748.000 0
Wat 550 Zone Reservoir Supply 342,000 58S% 1004 0 0 200.070
Eau55OZorse Reservoir Supply 608,000 58.5% 100% 0 O 355.680
Canterbury Srspply 1026.000 585% 10096 0 0 -,210
Nanhcast 550 Zu-Transmi.ma 676500 "_5% 100% 0 0 372353
Soul,5507 Tr-%"s.'- 1,054500 SBS% 100% 0 0 616.883
Northwest 550 Z e Tm,,dssin 714,400 58.5% IOD% 0 0 417.924
West Transmission MODO 563% 100% 0 0 489.060
9fci=uc,132.dto 13501 304,000 583% 100% 0 0 1]7.840
SW Walnut LISW I=Suva 342.000 585% 1004 0 0 200.070
csaterbur,Cool. 684.000 18.54 100% 0 0 400.140
SW CrecksW-Drive 85,000 583% 10096 04Y.-
an
UrbR-Area No.d8 760.00D 100.0% 100% 0 0 760.000
Buli M-nWn Crntral Loop 285,000 22.6% 100% 0 0 64.410
Wcu Transmission 436000 22.6% 100'% 0 0 Y03A56
1501h Avevtse 342,000 22.6% 100% 0 0 77.292
SouOs T-- 212500 22.6% 100% 0 0 48.025
Surview Caassection 42500 22.6% 100% 0 0 9.605
NMM nTrasasndssin 382.500 22.6% IOD% 0 0 W445
Southwest Transm6sin 85,000 22.6% 100% 0 0 19.210
4 Southeast Transndssin 255.00 000 22.6% IOM% 0 0 57.630
Noril-an Trans .- 238,0 22.6% 100% 0 0 53.788
i Novts Traysmtssin 8.5,000 226% 100% 0 0 19.2
4 SW'144th Avenue 142,587 23.1% 100% 0 0 32,918
i SWBenchview T- 114.000 23.1% 100% 0 0 26334
SW B-11 Mosmsair Road 285.000 23.1% If#% 0 0 65.835
Nauhwest Tr�tsmisain 191.250 23.1% 100% 0 0 64,179
SW ISM Avenue 85.000 23.1% 100% 0 0 19.635
7 Dhtributrn System Ovarsirzs 1.575.000 505% 44.8% 868.772 438.730 356.645
Tck-my BY-ltgsovemmn 300,000 505% 44.8% 165,480 83568 67.932
SUNdaI-T�^�^�n'n.DinfiWd a,and PuV Sta ka 26234.050 11.110.653 6.5]7.281 7361.903
TOTAL Dista tion Pro Cour X38314.037 5133]3,653 57.802581 512033.103
Table 5
Improvement Fee
Water Distribution System
Item Supply 410 Zone Bull Mountain
Project Cost(a) $44.325,500 $13,575,653 $21,038,397
%Allocable to Growth(b) 30.8% 57.5% 57.3%
Growth Related Cost(b) $13,652,254 $7,802,581 $12,053,103
Increase in Capacity Provided by Project,mgd(b) 6.16 8.37 5.89
Unit Cost of Additional Capacity,$/mgd $2,216,275 $932,208 $2,046,367
Unit Cost of Additional Capacity,$(gpd $2.22 $0.93 $2.05
Maximum Day Water Demand(gpd)(c) 645 645 645
Additional Capacity Cost Per EDU(d) $1,432 $600 $1,322
Less Debt Service Credit(e) ($552) $O $0
Improvement Fee,$/EDU $880 $600 $1,322
Notes:
(a)Water supply project cost: placeholder value to be incorporated into an adopted Capital Improvement Plan. I
ineclnd� nroc:eeds of$40M for oroiect and financing costs required to issue debt service
Distribution System:Refer to Table 4
(b) Water supply:Based on water supply project with 20 mgd capacity and projected 20W 13.84 mgd peak day demand.
Water supply growth percentage=(20-13.84)/20=30.8%
Distribution System:Refer to Table 4
1 (c) Projected 2000 peak day demand divided number of 2000 system-wide meter equivalents
7 (d) Unit cost of capacity,in$/gpd,multiplied by maximum day water demand per EDU
(e) Refer to Table 6
N
i
7
Seplanber 1.2000
C/QM HILL 1--
TrARD WATER SYSTEM SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE UPDATE
System Capacity and Unit Costs of Addf!anal Capacity
For the distribution system improvements,the increase in system capacity is the difference
between existing saturation maximum day demand and estimated existing maximum day
demand.This information is provided in the 2000 Hydraulic Study for the 410 Zone and
Bull Mountain area.
Table 5 shows the unit costs of capacity for the water supply component,the 410 Zone
distribution system component,and the Bull Mountain Lnea distribution component.The
unit cost of future capacity is calculated by dividing the project cost n1locable to growth by
the increase ir_system capacity.
Deb,Service Creat
A debt service credit is applied to the improvement fee in recognition that the water supply
project will be debt financed,that the water supply project benefits existing as well as future
customers,and that future customers will be repaying debt service for facilities that benefit
existing customers.The debt service credit is detailed in Table 6,and includes a calculation,
for each year where outstanding water supply project debt service exists,of the amount of
debt service principal benefiting existing customers that paid per EDU.The debt service
credit is the present value of these debt service payments calculated using a nominal interest
rate of 5%.Table 6 shows that the debt service credit is$552 per EDU.
Improvement Fee Per EDU
The improvement fee per EDU is calculated by multiplying the unit cost of future capacity
by the estimated capacity requirements,645 gpd,of an EDU,and applying the debt service
credit.Table 5 shows that the improvement fee for the water supply project(not including
the debt service credit discussed below)is$1,432 per EDU.This component of the
improvement fee would be applied system wide.For the 410 Zone,an additional
distribution system component of$600 per EDU would be applied,and for the Bull
Mountain area,an additional distribution system component of$1,322 per EDU would be
applied.
Proposed Systema Development Charge
The proposed SDC per EDU is the sum of the reimbursement fee and inn iuLpw emc fcc,
and is summarized in Table 7.Table 8 presents the proposed SDC applied to each water
meter size.Prior to adoption of the SDr,C142M HILL recommends that the City's legal
counsel review this memorandum and that a Capital Improvement Plan be adopted that
+ contains the capital improvements upon which the improvement fee is based.
a
a
s
SEPT 12000 SDC FINAL REPOF1T.D0C 7
. 1
Table 6
Debt Service Credit
Water Supply Project Cost 540,000,000
Less Existing Reserves Used to Finance Project ($3.900,000)
Debt Proceeds Toward Project $36,100,000
Financing Costs(Bond Reserve and Cost of Issuance) $4,325.500
Taal Debt Principal 540,425.500
Anticipated Debt Service Terms 3 Years Interest Only Payments Followed By
L,velized Principal and Interest Payments Over 22 Year Period
With Expected interest Rate of 6%
Present Value of Principal Repayment per EDU $552
Present Value Discount Rate 5.00%
Repl De W�
Replacement Replacement Principal Repayment
Principal Percent Debt Service Paid With Number of Principal per
Year Payment of Plant Principal SDC$ EDU$ _EDU
2001 s0 69.2% $0 s0 21,723 $0.00
2002 s0 69.2% $0 s0 21,983 s0.00
2003 s0 69.2% s0 $0 22,247 $0.00
2004 $931,629 69.2% $644,087 $0 22,514 $28.63
2005 $987,526 69.2% $683,368 s0 22,784 $29.99
2006 $1,046,778 69.2% $724,370 s0 23,058 $31.42
2007 $1,109,585 69.2% $767,833 so 23,334 $32.91
2008 $1,176,160 69.2% $813,903 s0 23,614 534.47
2009 $1,246,729 69.2% $862.737 s0 23,898 $36.10
200 $;.321533 69.2% $914,501 s0 24.184 $37.81
2011 $1,400,825 69.2% $969,371 $0 24,301 $39.89
2012 $1,484,875 69.2% $1,027,533 s0 24,418 $42.08
2013 $1,573,967 69.2% 61,089.185 s0 24,536 $4439
2014 51,668,405 69.2% $1,154.536 s0 24,654 $46.83
�-8 599 f+9.2% $1,223.808 $0 24,773 $49.40
2016 $1,874,620 69.2% $1,297,237 W
2017 $1,987,097 69.2% $1,375,071 s0 25,013 $54.98
2018 $2,106,323 69.2% $1,457,575 s0 25.133 $57.99
} 2019 $2,232,702 69.2% $1.545.030 s0 25254 $61.18
i 2020 - $2,366,664 69.2% $1,637,732 s0 25,376 $6454
2021 $2,508,664 69.2% $1,735.996 s0 25,476 $68.14
2022 $2,659,184 69.2% $1,840,155 $0 25,577 $71.95
i 2023 $2,818,735 69.2% $1,950,565 s0 25,678 $75.96
a 2024 $2,987,859 69.2% $2,067,599 $0 25,779 $80.20
2025 $3.167,131 69.2% $2.191,655 $0 25,881 $84.65
7
a�e.ei me
TIGARO WATER SYSTEM SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE UPDATE
TABLE 7
Proposed SDC Per Equivalent Dwelling Unit
410 Zone Bull Mountain Area
Reimbursement Fee $561 $561
Improvement Fee
Water Supply $1,432 $1,432
Debt Service Credit ($552) ($552)
Distribution System $600 $1,322
Total $2,041 $2,763
TABLE 8
Tigard Water Service Area Proposed System Development Charge Schedule
Meter Size 410 Zone Buil Mountain Area
5/8—'/.Inch $2,041 $2,763
1—Inch $5,103 $6,908
1 1/2-Inch $7,348 $9,947
2—Inch $16,328 $22,104
3—Inch $30,615 $41,445
�_Inch $51,025 $69,075
6—Incn $102,050 $138,150
8—Inch $163,280 $221,040
,_ ,,,_„ $293,496 $397,319
12 Inch $775,907 $1,050,382
i
i
I
I
3
a
SEPT 1 200 SOC FINAL REPORT.00C 8
HARD WATER SYSTEM SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE UPDATE
APPENDIX
Jil
SEPT 12000 SOCfWAL REJORf.DOC 9
OREGON REVISED STATUTES,1997 VERSION,CHAPTER 223
SYST'FM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
223.297 Policy.The purpose of ORS 223.297 to 2.23.314 is to provide a uniform framework for
the imposition of system development charges by governmental units for specified purposes
and to establish that the charges may be used only for capital improvements.[1989 c.449 s.l;
1991 c.902 s.251
Note:223.297 to 223.314 were added to and made a part of 223.205 to 223.295 by!egislative
action,but were not added to and made a—rt of the Bancroft Bonding Act.See section 10,
chapter 449,Oregon Laws 1989.
223.299 Definitions for ORS 275.297 to:,Z3.314.As used in ORS 223.297 to 223.314:
(1)(a)"Capital improvement"means facilities or assets used for the following-.
(A)Water supply,treatment and distribution;
(B)Waste water collection,transmission,treatment and disposal;
(C)Drainage and flood control;
(D)Transportation;or
(E)Parks and recreation.
(b)"Capital improvement'does not include costs of the operation or routine maintenance of
capital improvements.
(2)"improvement fee"means a fee for costs associated with capital improvements to be
constructed.
(3)"Reimbursement fee"means a fee for costs associated with capital improvements already
constructed or under consa-uction.
(4)(a)"System development charge"means a reimbursement fee,an improvement fee or a
combination thereof assessed or collected at the time of increased usage of a capital
improvement or issuance of a development permit,building permit or connection to the capital
improvement.System development charge includes that portion of a sewer or water system
connection charge that is greater than the amount necessary to reimburse the governmental unit
for its average cost of inspecting and installing connections with water and sewer facilities.
(b)"System development charge'does not include any fees assessed or collected as part of a
local improvement district or a charge in lieu of a local improvement district assessment or the
cost of complying with requirements or conditions imposed upon a land use decision,
expedited land division or limited land use decision.[1989 c.449 s.2;1991 c.817 s.29;1991 c.902
s.26;1995 x595 s.28)
Note:See note under 223.297.
223.300[Repealed by 1975 c.642 s.261
223.302 System development charges;use of revenues;review procedures.(1)Goverrunen'•_ I
=+s are authorized to establish system development charges,but the revenues produced
therefrom shall be expended only in accordarice with ORS 223,297 to 223.314.If a governmental
unit expends any such revenues in violation of the lir_itations described in ORS 273.307,the
governmental unit shall replace the misspent amount with moneys derived from other sources.
Replacement moneys shall be deposited in a fund designated for the system development
' charge revenues not later than one year following a determination that the funds were
misspent.
(2)Governmental units shall adopt administrative review procedures by which any citizen or
other interested person may challenge an expenditure of system development charge revenues.
Such procedures shall provide that such a cballenge must be filed within two years of the
expenditure of the system development charge revenues.The decision of the governmental unit
shall be reviewed only as provided in ORS 34.010 to 34.100,and not otherwise.[1989 c.449 s.3;
1991 c.902 s.271
Note:See note under 223.29:.
223.304 Determination of amount of system development charges;ordinance;credit allowed
against charge;limitation of action contesting ordinance imposing chaage;notification
request.(1)Reimbursement fees shall be established by ordinance or resolution setting forth a
methodology that considers the cost of the existing facility or facilities,prior contributions by
existing users,the value of unused capacity,rate-making principles employed to finance
publicly owned capital improvements and other relevant factors identified by the local
government imposing the fee.The methodology shall promote the objective of future system
users contributing no more than an equitable share to the cost of existing facilities.The
methodology for establishing such fees shall be available for public inspection.
(2)Improvement fees shall be established by ordinance or resolution setting forth a
methodology that consider;the cost of projected capital improvements needed to increase the
capacity of the systems to which the fee is related.The methodology for establishing such fees
shall be available for public inspection.
(3)The ordinance or resolution that establishes an improvement fee shall also provide for a
credit against such fee for the construction of a qualified public improvement.A"qualified
public improvement"means a capital improvement that is required as a condition of
development approval,identified in the plan adopted pursuant to ORS 223.309 and either:
(a)Not located on or contiguous to property that is the subject of development approval;or
(b)Located in whole or in part on or contiguous to property that is the subject of development
approval and required to be built larger or with greater capacity than is necessary for the
particular development project to which the improvement fee is related.
(4)(u)"The credit provided for in subsection(3)of this section shall be only for the improvement
fee charged for the type of improvement being constructed,and credit for qualified public
improvements under subsection(3)(b)of this section may be granted only for the cost of that
portion of such improvement that exceeds the government units minimum standard facility size
or capacity needed to serve the particular development project or property.The applicant shall
have the burden:of demonstrating that a particular improvement qualifies for credit under
subsection(3)(b)of this section.
{b)When,the construction of a qualified public improvement gives rise to a credit amount
greater than the improvement fee that would otherwise be levied against the project receiving
devel..�pment approval,the excess credit may be applied against improvement fees that accrue
in subsequent phases of the original development project.This subsection shall not prohibit a
unit of government from providing a greater credit,or from establishing a system providing for
the transferability of credits,or from providing a credit for a capital improvement not identified
in the plait adopted pursuant to ORS 213.309,or from providing a share of the cost of such
improvement by other means,if a unit of government so chooses.
" (c)Credits shall be used in the time specified in the ordinance but not later than 10 years from
the date the credit is given.
()An
5 Any,mit of lorai government that proposes to adopt a system development charge shall
y maintain a list of p.rsons who have made a written request for notification prior to adoption or
amendment of a methodology for any system development charge.Written notice shall be
mailed to persons on the list at least 45 days prior to the first hearing to adopt or amend a
system development charge,and the methodology supporting t=he adoption or amendment
shall be available at least 30 days prior to the first hearing to adopt or amend.The failure of a
i
person on the list to receive a notice that was mailed shall not invalidate the action of the local
government.The unit of local government may periodically delete names from the list,but at
least 30 days prior to removing a name from the list must notify the person whose name is to)e
deleted that a new written request for notification is required if the person wishes to remain on
the notification list.No legal action intended to contest the methodology used for calculating a
system development charge shall be filed after 60 days following adoption or modification of
the system development charge ordinance or resolution by the local government.A.person shall
contest the methodology used for calculating a system development charge only as provided in
ORS 34.010 to 34.100,and not otherwise.[1989 c.449 s.4;1991 c.902 s.28;1993 c.80's.201
Note:See note under 223.297.
223.305[Repealed by 1971 c.325 s.l]
223.307 Autho_-ized expenditure of system development charges.(1)Reimbursement fees shall
be spent only on capital improvements associated with the systems for which the fees are
assessed including expenditures relating to repayment of indebtedness.
(2)Improvement fees shall be spent only on capacity increasing capital improvements,
including expenditures relating to repayment of debt for such improvements.An increase in
system capacity may be established if a capital improvement increases the level of performance
or service provided by exiting facilities or provides new facilities.The portion of such
improvements funded by improvement fees must be related to current or projected
development.
(3)System development charges shall not be expended for costs associated with the
construction of adsinistrative office facilities that are more than an incidental part of other
capital improvements.
(4)Any capital improvement being funded wholly or in part with system development charge
revenues shall be included in the plan adopted by a governmental unit pursuant to ORS
223.309.
(5)Notwithstanding subsections(1)and(2)of this section,system development charge
revenues may be expended on the direct costs of complying with the provisions of ORS 223.297
to 223.314,including the costs of developing system development charge methodologies and
providing an annual accounting of system development charge expenditures.11989 c.449 s.5;
1991 c.902 s.291
Note:See note under 223.297.
i
i
(2)A Qovemmental unit that has prepared a plan described in subsection(1)of this section may t
+ modify such plan at any time.[1989 c.449 s.6;1991 c.902 s.301
+ Note:See note under 223.297.
j 223.310[Amended by 1957 c.397 s.3;repealed by 1971 c.325 s.l]
{ 223.311 Deposit of system development charge revenues;annual accounting.System
S development charge revenues shall be deposited in accounts designated for such moneys.The
governmental unit shall provide an annual accounting for system development charges
showing the total amount of system development charge revenues collected for each system
and the projects that were funded.11989 c.449 s.7;1991 c.902 s.311
Note:See note under 223.297.
223.312[1957 c.95 s.4;repealed by 1971 c.325 s.11
223.313 Application of ORS 223.297 to 223.314.(1)ORS 223.297 to 223.314 shall apply only to
system development charges in effect on or after July 1,1991.
(2)The provisions of ORS 223.297 to 223.314 shall not be applicable if they are construed to
impair bond obligations:or which system development charges ha.e been pledged or to impair
the ability of governmental units to issue new bonds or other financing as provided by law for
improvements allowed under ORS 223.297 to 223.314.[1989 c.449 s.8;1991 c.902 s.32)
Note:See note under 223.297.
223.314 Adoption of system development charge not a land use decision.The adoption of a
system development charge,or a plan as provided for in ORS 223.309,or any modification
thereto,is not a land use decision pursuant to ORS chapters 195 and 197.[1989 c.449 s.91
NGte:See note under 223.297.
Dowriloadedfroai-,vww.leg.state.or.us/o October 18,1999.
Mu>ragSmi�&Acsodnes,tuc.
.`__ _ llism.�,s�tom . eonhnd,aegou9�1 �o�io}�T7010 �x;o�2t�-9oz�
FACSIl4IILIL TRANSMQTTAL
Date: June 8.2000 Job No.: 99-0430.401
Thee: 9:30 a.m. _ Re: City of Tigard Distribution System
Pages(including cover sheet): 6 Hydraulic Study Financial Flan
Orighml to fbHow by mail: UYes H No Technical As tante
Attention: f+st Griffith
Company: CH2M Hill
Fax Number: 425-452-5957
Comments: Art: here is a drift copy of the technical rremorandum for financial pian
technical assistance. If you have 2M questions or comments please give us a tali Thank you
i
i
0 cc: Mike Miller.City of Tigard aid Fa-o•_•_•_- Carie Peterson
MOM.(flow do riot necrim Om maam(ats at desc e7,ad atov4;pig au eonraerarvofJies Dema ady.
Z�:-j l00'd lli-1 ZZ089lZEU4 YTSK-mg EL'EO C�6i-80-WSP
R �
i
I �lotl�;snrim� es,loe.
ltlfjlt2e15i1= _ htl ttu.yb,�yyt 1020 . Pabmi.0itgm 9TM • PH n SOf12i910 FAX 50jdZ5-90jj
DATE: Juste 8,2000
PROJECT: 99-0430-401 D�/ ' °
TO: Mr-Art Griffith s� 8
CH2M Hill
FROM: Chris Uber,P.B.
Murray,Smith&Associates,Inc.
RE: City of Tigard Distribution System Hydraulic Study Financial Plan Technical
Assistance
1
Introduction
In accordance with your request and the City's authorization,this technical memorandum has
been prepared to document a cost apportionment of recommended water distribution system
improvements from the City of Tigard's recently completed Water Distribution System
Hydraulic Study, The methodology used for the apportionment of costs is developed and
applied in accordance with your direction- This methodology is used to apportion the project
cost of each improvement between existing and future capacity needs of the system and
presents tabulated summaries of this effort.
Background
in May 20M_wnrar Distribu!io,System t-tydravlic Str4dv was completed for the City of
Tigard by Murray,Smith&Associates,Inc- As part of this study a detailed hydraulic
analysis of the distribution system was performed. The analysis evaluated the performance
of the existing system and identified system improvements necessary to correct existing
deficiencies and to provide for future system expansion. Also included in this effort was the
* development of project cost estimates for all recommended improvements. These estunates
are used in this memorandum as the basis for all cost data
a In conjunction with the hydraulic study,the City is also reviewing and updating its water
1 service area system development charges(SDCS). In developing the SDCs,a methodology
was established in accordance with our discussions for determining the proportion of each
improvement needed to correct existing deficiencies and the proportion needed for system
99-0430.401 1'agc 1 Dist auxr,g--n Sys=Hydrauhc Steady
June 8.2000 FinancW Plan Technical Assistance
City of Tigard
ZSt-d Z00'd Z_'.-.t ZZ059ZZEOS VISVI-MI WOO 00OZ-80-IUIP
expansion. In addition,all improvement project costs associated with the Bull Mountain
service area are identified. The Bull Mountain service area includes the 550-foot zone,the.
713-foot zone and the 713-foot high pressure zone covering areas on Bull Mountain and
Canterbury hilt, Presented below is a desi-aiption of the methrv_rinw r1P.VP.loneli to
apportion the costs of recommended improvements and to identify improvements needed to
serve the Bull Mountain service area.
Methodology
Work associated with the hydraulic study included iden''dfieation of existing population and
water demands,and development of anticipated ultimate population and water demands for
the entire water service area. Based on projected water demand data and planning and
analysis criteria developed for the hydraulic study,distribution system piping,pumping and
storage improvements needed to correct existing system deficiencies and to support system
expansion were identified for the water system service area-
For
reaFor use in development of SDCs,recommended improvements are grouped according to the
pressure zone they will serve. The proportionate difference between the existing maximum
day water demand and the projected ultimate maximum day water demand for each pressure
zone is the basis for apportioning casts of improvements between existing capacities and
future capacity needs. Project costs for improvements recommended within the Urban
Reserve areas are considered entirely for future development and are apportioned as such_
Water demands and corresponding existing and future capacity percentages for each zone are
shown in Table 1.
Table I
Project Cost Allocation by Pressure Zone Summary
..;C.� °.fi�•ps�.to,3¢�Ca6sft.:•�•;--
Iry
�•• •`moi•.. �- �l�li�:: ..`' - .F.a.-c.rj,r. `tw+,���8�� .?`+. ,n-?:c5.•':'fi�._
`:oiiL.�. ':"':les_.. .k3v•• ..uJlb'.�'�''•'Yf';�• .��. w..:. r.
410-Foot 7.8 15-5 50.3% 49.7%
550-Foot(,-xavity and high pressv �) 2.7 6.5 41.s% 585%
713-Foot 2.4 1 3.1 77.4% 22.6%
i 713-Foot Mgh Pressure 1.0 i-3 76.4% 23.196
:26A"':s %9275o•'r.; "4'7390`
�..
Urban Reserve 1? 0% 100%
Total Water Service Area 139 28.1 49.5% SOS%
Most improvements recommended in the hydraulic study will ultimately serve only one zone
a and are easily divided by the capacity percentages for that zone. A few projects will serve
more than one zone when they are completed. For these improvements,a more detailed
allocation calculation is required. A discussion of this allocation is presented below.
99-40430.401 Page 2 - Distribution System Hydraulic Study
June 8,2000 Financir_l Man Technical Assistance
r- -- City of Tigard
zst-a troo'd W-1 zzosszzeos YYi{t-Mi woo cooz-eo-mr
Pumping and Storage Facilities for the 713 foot Zones
The High Tor Reservoirs,and the pumping facilities serving them,supply both the 713-foot
zone and the 713-foot high pressure zona, inprovem—*s re—commended to t1sescuu-1 iu
Y Y K-
and storage facilities are initially divided between the two zones based on their respective
ultimate maximum day water demand. The project cost of each recommended improvement
is then apportioned into existing and fixture costs using the method dcscnbed abcove. Finally,
the existing and future costs from each zone are added back together as listed in Table 2.
Transfer Pump Station
The Transfer Pump Station will ultimately serve the 5513-foot tone and both 713-foot zones_
Improvement costs for the transfer pump station are appropriated based on proportionate
ultimate pumping capacities to each zone. Under this condition,approximately 3,900 gpm
will be pumped to the 550-foot zone,and approximately 3,300 gpm will be pumped to both
of the 713-foot zones. The portion of the project cost allocated to the 550-foot zone is then
divided into existing and future costs using the previously described method. The portion
allocated jointly to the 713-foot zones is split between the two,and the4 divided into existing
and future costs. The existing and future costs from each zone are then added back together
as listed in Table 2.
Pump Station No.2
Pump Station No_2 will ultimately pump to the 10 MG Reservoir,which provides storage
for the entire water service area. '*he project cost allocaticei of this improvement serving the
Bull Mountain service area is determined by proportioning costs between the 13ull Mountain
service area and the entire service area under a maximum day water demand condition at
saturation development. The project cost is then divided into existing and future costs using
the method described above. This improvement is listed separately on Tables 2 and 3 to
reflect the portions of its service to the 410-foot zone and to the Bull Mountain service area.
Cr►nclo�sion
Cost breakdowns for all proposed facility and piping improvements are summarized in
Tables 2 and 3. Table 2 lists improvements that will serve the Bull Mountain service area,
and Table 3 lists all other improvements.
9904.30.401 Page 3 bl ufttion System Hydratulc study
Junes 8.2000 Financial Plan?eehnicat Assistance
City of Ttgazd
291-d Y00'd 291-1 ZZOOMEDS Mr.-nmi woo ooamo-1mr
Table 2
Bull Mountain Servla Area Improvements
Project Cost Estimate Summary
Iry -
aeility Im rgvements
Station No_2 fAl%) $ 164,000 $ 91.840 $ 72,160
enlor Station $ 675,000 S 280.125 1 S 394,875
ransfer Fu Station $ 2.100.000 $ 1,176,000 $ 924,000
h Tor Pump Station $ 750,000 S 576,750 $ 173,250
50 Foot Reservoir No.1(2.0 MG) $ 2950,000 $ 1.224.250 $ 1,725,750
50-Foot Reservoir No.2(3-0 MG) $ 4-200,000 S 1,743.000 S 2,457,000
713-Foot Reservoir No.4O.8 MG S 2.100.000 $ 1.623,300 S 476.700
50 Foot Zone Pi g Im rovements
est 550.Fc Reservoir Sn 1 $ 342 000 $ 141,930 S 200,070
550 Ft Reservoir Su 1 $ 608,000 $ 252320 $ 355,680
terb Su 1 S 1.026,000 $ 425.790 $ 600,210
ortheast 5506wFt Zone Transmission $ 636,500 S 264,148 $ 372,353
oath 550 Ft.Zone Transmission S 1,054500 $ 437,618 $ 616.883
orthwest 550-Ft Zone Transmission $ 714,400 S 296,476 $ 417,924
est Transmission S 836,000 S 346,940 $ 489,060
Laut.132nd to 135th $ 304,000 S 126,160 $ 177,£40
nut I-ane/SW Fern Street $ 342000 $ 141,930 S 200,070
ry loo $ 684000 S 283860 $ 400,140
kshi:eDrive $ 85,000 S 35,275 $ 497255
eserve Ama No.48 $ 760000 $ $ 760.000
t Zone Piping Im rosc nrnts
Bull Mountain Central Loop Is 295.0001S 220590 $ 64,410
West Transmission $ 456,000 5 352 944 $ 103,056
150th Ave. $ 342.0001 $ 264,708 J.S 77.292
Smut+ Transmission i$ 212-5001 $ 164,475 1 S 48,025
® Statview Connection $ 42,500 S 32,895 S 9.605
Northeast Transmission _ _- S 382,500 $ 296,055 S 86.445
outhwestTransmission S 85.000 S 65,790 S 19,210
Southeast Transmission $ 255,000 $ 197.370 S 57,630
orthwest Transmission _ $ 238,000 $ 184,212 S 53.788
orth Transmission 3 85-000 S 6.790 $ 19,210
1t13C' ��- 1.Si:."..:rr:
13 Foot lUgh Pressure Zone Piping improvements
W 144th Ave. $ 142.500 T-169-583 S 32.918
Sw genrhview Terrace $ 114,000 5 87,666 IS 26,334
_W Bull Mt-Road $ 285,000 S 219,165 S 65,835
orthwestTransmission $ 191.250 $ 147.071 S 44,179
SW 150th Ave. $ 85.000 S 65.365 S� 19.635
`- Tota! $ 23-532,690 $ 11
oaaZOW
Fwnes�oa[+�+p.�ori5ace�rcca�Nuyv'�ah to
AM
291-d 900'd 0002-80-ldlr
Table 3
410-Foo=Zone Improvements
Project Cost Fi±-%thrude Summary
a
It
Improvements '
upump Station No.2 5996 S 236,000 $ 118.708 S 117,292
30-Foot Reservo+rNo.S 1.0 MG S 2.400,000 $ 1,207.200 S 1,192,800
W Gaarde Street PRV Station $ 150,000 S 75.450 S 74.550
121St Ave,and Former Stroet PPV Station S 280,00 $ 140.8401 $ 139,160
� ut rr ,tea
l0-Foot Zone Pl lat vements
Walnut Street S 681.720 S 342,905 $ 338,815
alnutSexet121sttoBarrows tea' S 1,368,000 S 688,104 S 679.896
arrows Road S 304,000 S 152,912 S. 151,088
it8 No.1 Piping Improvements $ 200,000 S 100,600 5 99,400
S1te M.4 Piping Lm rovementa S 300.000 S 1f 0,900 S 149,100
eef Bend Road&Pacific Iii wav S 1,254,000 $ 630,762 S 623.238
Oath 121st Ave.Upgrade S 513,000 $ 258,039 S 254,961
W Ldtteoin Strcet S 60,000 S 30.180 S 29,820
Burnbam Suva S 334.400 S 168,203 $ 166.197
t 410-Ft.Zone Upgra& S I,109.600 S 558.129 $ 551,471
W Barrows Road S 228,000 S 114.684 S 113.316
W Xing Richard Drive S 68.000 S 34.204 S 33,796
93rd AveJSW 92nd Ave. $ 399,000 S 200,697 S 198,303
W Fairhaven $ 421.800 S 212.165 S 209,635
SW Kareo/SW 125th Ave:. $ 127,500 $ 64,133 $ 63 36$
10 Restrvoir No.5 Su 1 $ 380,000 $ 191.140 S 188,860
CI Urban Reserve
NO.47) IS 344500 b - S 344.500
est Urban]terserve No 49 ,$ 1.748.000 i$
t'ri1i:"•l.��'rfiv42vy' ice$ �.!#i+i,'
Total S907 S 3 39 55 $ 7467
F �O,lb. sl Af�Y�,6� 05140k512100e"AM
251-d 900"d 291-1 i20691ZE05 Yl91H108d 9Ee00 .0002-@0-Wlf
EXH 1151T a�n
Table
City of 3
Water Distribution Sysi
Capital Improvement
550•Faol ReaervoM No.1 rgwtly PuNhew 5l0Fnat R�aarwir No.1
z (55OFo Zuw) S 150.0001 S 1.400,000 - 1.480.008
550-Foot R—ir No.2 1'topony Pwtluae 550-Foot Rsearmk N0.2
55OFoot Zane S 200000 1 S 2.000.008 f 2.000.000
4/0•F:.o1 Reaervdr No,5
Storage flawwk 4S0-=Zor_- _
Factlttles F.—M 71311F o--lvok 140.4 ..
13•Foot Zone
Reservoir Eveluatbn flawrvok Evalwibn Propnm
P s /30,000
Raservdr No.3,A Reservo
Abantlan nan,
SWToIa f 350,000 S S 130000 S 1400000 S 1400000 S - S S 2,00(1.= f 2.00800
Msmior Rewrvok Site Manby Pump S.
5.50-F=ZOM S x75.800
New Pump Sbtbna Trarmiv Pump Station Tronfer Pump Slalian
S=N13-Foct Zona 00 S 1.050.0f 1.050.000
Htp)1 Tw Reservck Sit.
Pumping 13-Foot zone
Facilities Pamp Lion Pump Station No.2
llppre0es Resenrok Site No.2
132ntl Street Pump Station
P—P Station 13•Fod Zona
AouWarmW Pump Station No.1 Pump Station No.7 Aband v ant
Akaun4c anant Is 50.000
Sub•TMe S 5875
$ - S - S - (.105000(! S 9050000 It .50000 S
treet
12'(14•Walnut S24•Walnut Street Suppy Main 18•Barrows
41aFool Zone f 681.720 f 458.000 $ 458.000 S 458.088 $ -+04.000
Tra Ession 16.20.550Foot Reservoir No.t Supply
Improumgrts 55 1--Zona f 152.000 S 190."
2(r24.550Faot Reservoir No.2 Supply
S 380.000 S 228.000
713-Fool Zone 12'150m Ave
S 171.00o S
41PFo Zone
Distribution 550-F—Zone
System I,Fka Fke Flotow n
Piping 713-Foot Zone
713-HP Zone
D4trbulbn System Wast Suit Mountain Area Water Main 0—lzip VarbuatMrsizkp Propos•tOpatbna DpM60n1 Ql FN
hnpovamen1 S 75.000 S 75,000 S 75,000 s 75,000 S 75.000 $ 75,000 S 75,000 f 75.000 f 75 000
Cvanl:ll9 Program
naauciKl
FadAtin S 150.000w
U roh St
Water Mein S 08.800
fl9PieC9manta •1x•SW Burnham
9 4 000 f ]5 000 $ 75,000 ; 75,0001S 7500010 75 000 f 751g S 75.000
Sutb Tota S 1452.]20 S 438.000 f 321.040 S 606.00o It 606.8011 $S -988000 S 882000 150000 13000
Ground ASR Study �St"d'
4 Water
S 25,000 s 25,000
Wells
Sub-Tote $ 25000 s 2500o S - $
Telemetry System Telemetry System Evalua5on Telanaztry Syslem knpreveman[s
Other S 56.000 s 1s.oao
p
sue.TMa s SD hoc s 1zs 660 ss
7
S 3,013,]20 S ],60/,7wf f 11.3x9.729
1-1
508,880 ��,520,34! 5.=,42 t
syy�w.aaoaLrTw�wa' 1rY►1