Loading...
Resolution No. 96-52 ZMEMM0w.. CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON r� RESOLUTION NO.96. A RESOLUTION CREATING A SOLID WASTE EFFICIENCIES TASK FORCE AND } APPOINTING MEMBERS TO ASSESS SOLID WASTE HAULERS'EFFICIENCY SUGGESTIONS. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council solicited efficiency suggestions from the local franchised solid waste haulers;and 5 k h: WHEREAS, the Council determined it would be in the best interest of the City to have a review and analysis of the suggestions to determine what rate and service impacts would occur if the suggestions were implemented. x' " NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The City of Tigard hereby creates the Solid Waste Efficiencies Task Force to review and analyze the franchised haulers'efficiency suggestions and make recommendations to the Tigard City Council regarding anticipated affects on solid waste rates and service delivery if suggestion(s)were implemented. t 3= SECTION 2: The Task Force shall be composed of three voting members,who are hereby appointed by the Council as follows: u Councilor Robert Rohlf-Council Liaison to the Task Force; ' John L.Cook-Community Business Leader;and Mike Leichner,Pride Disposal Company and Franchised Haulers'Representative. The four non-voting mambers of the Task Force shall be: two City staff members, Wayne Lowry,Finance Director and coordinator for the Task Force meetings,and Loreen Mills,Senior Analyst;and the other two franchised haulers;namely,Tom Miller,Miller's Sanitary Service;and Larry Schmidt,Schmidt's Sanitary Service. The Franchised Haulers'Representative will cast his vote on issues,after determining g what the majority of the franchised haulers'believe to be their position. Itis possible that a majority vote may be accompanied by a minority vote report as well if the haulers are unable to arrive at a unanimous position. 211 =i SECTION 3: The term of the appointments shall be for the duration of the Task Force activity.,The -' Task Force shall complete its work by 0228/97. It shall provide a progress and status -Lt report to the City Council no later than 12/17/96. SECTION 4: The Task Force shall comply with all requirements of the Oregon Public Meetings Law, { ORS 192.610-192.7 10. SECTION 5: The Task Force is charged with the responsibility for the following: } RESOLUTION NO.96- ._t -n DO- Review the attached(Exhibit"A")compilation of hauler suggestions; * Determine what the impact on rates and service delivery would be and share Task Force concerns about any of the suggestions reviewed;and k * Report to Council,for its consideration,the Task Force's findings and ( recommendations to achieve efficiencies in service delivery,while keeping !� rates reasonable. PASSED: This _dayof UOV51 1996. t� Marr'/City of Tigard ATTEST: ' ' t" City Recorder-City of Tigard 11IR" �x a "yt of 5F RESOLU770NNO.96- —5-2 Paget ra x y u • pkv 4 - EXHIBIT "A" ' �`.y Y, COMPH.ATiON OF HAULER SU(:GESTiONS(all haulers gt;ree nn thesel x f • Mandate all containers at the curb and charge for service away from the curb; ..:Provide commingled pickup of recyclables&review options for less than weekly collection; • Provide for direct access and truck maneuvering space for automated pickup of the following: :x x t Commercial accounts; af, Multi-family accounts;and . �`a.. Drop box accounts. �, r�Rx3r OTHER SUGGESTIONS SUBMITTED BY INDIVIDUAL HAULERS x • Limit vacation credits to two weeks or longer; Charge customers that regularly require extra bookkeeping work(i.e.,accounts that are always past due). ` • Re-establish the Solid Waste Advisory Committee-A S WAC process would allow the time +�- and resources to evaluate alternatives soundly,adding to the limited resources of full-time t &i,, staff �,;'ir` • Drop Box and Compactor Fees- 'i" A. Change rental fee on Drop Boxes to a daily fee instead of a fee with a 48-hour grace period. B. Raise Compactor fees to cover recycling cost(as Washington County is proposing). I. Use additional revenue to do one of the following: ,} a. Lower drop box haul fees(15%-20%) b. `Lower commercial container rates to be revenue neutral. • Make no changes in cart size,or major program changes for 5 years,to allow program costs to amortize; • Additional methods to streamline cart use in Tigard:(see attached options 1-4) Y ? ` x � OPTIONC TO CTREAMi iNFCART LtSE IN TLCARlT i. "�. Exx, S?,{)tion 1-Residential 10 xA>x x, r A. All customers receive and use roll carts(20 gal,32 gal,60 gal,or 90 gal) Ax 1. Curb rate y y" s ak 2. Roll out or yard rate 3. Service charged for inaccessible carts „ y L A. Placed near cars t B. Placed near mailboxes,trees,etc. r x ° B. Establish rates on a cost-of-service for 20 gal-32 gal. , 1. 60 gal is disposal component only increase over a 32 gat is`* 2. 90 gal is disposal component only increase over a 60 gal s a Option 2-Residentialsa 1 A. All customers receive and use roll carts(60 gallon only) s'faSl.. ' 1. Curb rate x 2 Roll out or yard rate { 3. Service charged for inaccessible carts A. Placed near cars B. Placed near mailboxes,trees,etc. , B. Establish rate for monthly fee to cover solid waste costs c 1. Per pickup fee for disposal-$2.50/60 gal `x , 2. 20 gal customer=60 gal every 3 weeks r 32 gal customer=60 gal every 2 weeks 60 gal customer=60 gal every week ° 3. 1 size cart lowers inventory costs-60 gal cart 4. 1 size cart=60 gal=standard size ` 5. Computerized billing is current option with RFID(computerized)tags Option 3-Residential A. Automate curbside recycling for paper and plastics B. 'Collect glass and metal one time per month 1. -Green/Brown glass-one time per month s .Clear glass/Metals-one time per month k �. OR-- :a4 Glass/Metals mixed E ,' x Paper/Plastic mixed Option 4-Commercial A. Standardize commercial enclosure sizes and locations,access,etc. 1. Discount for containers with no wheels(easier/safer to service) 2: Credit property owner for recycling areas of setting landscaping requirements 1 in pianningrcuiiding permir approval stag-. B. Recycling in Commercial sector to have options a 1. Minimum standards per Washington County s s Split Wet vs.Dry recyclables and collect split loads I 1} 779 s§ t � z