Resolution No. 88-90 CI-(Y OF I 16ANO, OREGON
RLSOLU I ION NO. 88 0
A RLl'.;0L,J-lJ-ON P,,'OVlt)IN(., �UPPORI FOR AND COMMINP�; ON Hit. W()SHINGlorj cowwy
TRANSPORTATION PLAN, PU31.L(' PFVffW DRAI r
wilt,RL-As. W,AshimjLori Cour!k,y And Che lo(-..jj juri7dictions have Jointly developed
a County Wide t ran y por t A i,on p 1,4r) a dd ro�;6 i rwl over-all syst"JI) through
Lhe Washington County Transportation Coordinating Cummittoo; and
WHEREAS, there is a no ed to resolve certain i ransport,.-it ion platin i ny
diff(wc,nco, local jurisdictions and the County; and
WHI RCAI3, in the interest of coordinated ptanning, it. i s desirable to have
City/County aqroevnero or-, particular, portions of the County Tran-por-tation Plan.
NOW, -mvRilot'r, f!f 11 REsolVEJ) by the 7igard City C;ounvij tir-u:
Soctiori, 1 11-he City Council of the City of ritgwd suppor Ls tho WAshinqt.n
County I r a—por LaLion Plan and r'oc,.)qnizc-,s th,> policies and
s t,r,,-.t eq i o- as q u*I d e 1 i n e s in t ran s po r-La t i o n fila t t
County--wide interest
Section 2 1 hG City C"ww i I furthor recognize,,:; thfo 1.law inig spec j.f is
transpor-La(ion system waps as conditioned by attached Exhibit A:
Functional Classification Map
Road 11,1prov"mont. Projects Map
County 14ido Road System Map
Through "truck Route- Map
1-r-arisit Map
On-street Bicyclia Route Mao
Uniform Road Improvement ffiosign Standards
Section 3; 0010v' cofl!"Wrlts of the City Council regarding Che County
Transportation Plan are contained in tho attached Exhibit A.
PAC;GED: This J00 <- ,
dav of
ATT��T: Mayor City of Tigard
or
Ar�PVEP-lky TO FORM:
C�I;ty Rec,order
bat G,
br/6849D
RESOLUTION NO. 88—t7().
Page 1
i
E_XHIBII- 'A'
rhe following _onditional statements and comments :'elate to the City Council's
support for the County l-ranspottation Plan.
1. ThCL) _truck _routes. The City Council supports the concept of
designating through truck routes thrvugheut the County. However, the
City Council does not support the designation oiDurhaitt Road as a truck
route at this time. in addition, the City Council suggests that Upper-
600nes Ferry Road through the City of Durham should riot be designated
as a through truck route; S.W. 72nd Avenue is suggested as an
alternative to Upper Uoones I.err-y Road as a truck route.
2. Count l+Ji.de Road_.System. The City supports the concept of es""blishing
a county-wide road system and the City supports the county-wide--- road
system map shown in the draft Transportation Plan. The City agrees
with the philosophy that roadways of county--wide significance should
receive an equitable share of maintenance funding resources. However,
the City does not endorse the road jurisdiction policy shown in the
draft plan. The City Council sp�•cificaily does nut. endorse the
proposal that the City relinquish jurisdiction on Durham Road and
Greenbury Road within the City of Tigard.
3. Transit. The City Council agr-ces that, additional transit: routes should
be established to serve the rapidly developing arm-...s of 119r:.•-.
City Council strongly supports the concept that light railtransit
should be extended to serve Tigard.
4, Airports. Figure 13 showing airports and heliports should be amended
to include the proposed private use heliport at Lincoln Tower near,
Greenburg and Highway 217.
5. Finance. Additional work is needed to resolve differences among the
various jurisdictions in their methods of collecting development impact
fees. While a unifono county--wide method of collecting development
fees may be desirable, the City Council is not prepared to endorse the
County's Traffic Impact Fee program at this time. Additional work is
needed to assure that any program adopted includes a method for
allocating the resulting revenues to fund projects in the areas where
the revenues are actually collected.
6. Coital Improvement- Progr,a_q. The City dues not endorse the: proposed
road improvement project prioritization methods as they relate to
roadway projects within the City. The City feels that project
priorities need to relate less to s; Ct. iai classification and more to
the severity of safety and capacity needs.
RESOLUTION NO. 88_.
Page 2
i __
0
Exhibit A (Continued)
7. Uniform Road I:mprovcment GtsiyniandarJg.. -fh, City Council ayrees
that uniform design standards arcs desirable. fhe Council recognizes
that efforts are currently undorway atthe engineering staff level to
resolve dif-furc-races in design standards ammy the variuus
juris.idictions. When the staff effort is ctwpleLwh the Council will
consider formal adoption of the standards. Prior to formal adoption,
the City will continue to use the County standards as quidelines except
where there is conflict with adopted City standards.
8, gull Mountain Connections. -the City is currently working with the
County to establish specific alignments for a system of collector
streets to serve khe northeast area of Bull Mountain and to provide
future connections between Waln++t t+treet, Gaarde 6ireet, —,d Hull
Mountain Road. It is anticipated that public meetings will be held
during Lhe fall of 1988 to review potential alternative routes and that
a specific plan will be adopted by the City and the County early in
1989. Tho City Council requests that this study effort be recognized
and that prevision be made to effeci_ appropriate revisions to the
County TrwnsportaLion Plan Maps following adoption of a specific plan
for' collector streets in the r-,.artheast area of Bull ^mmW in.
br/68496
s
RLSC+LUTION NO. 88—� (/
Page 3 �^