Loading...
Resolution No. 85-75 CITY OF TI�GARD, OREGON RES0I_07 TON NO. $5 „�J A RESOLUTION OF THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL SUPPORT]'NG THE WASHINGTON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COORDINATING COMMITTEE'S MAJOR STREETS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (MSTIP) AND RECOMMENDING SUBMITTAL TO THE VOTERS. WHEREAS, Washington County has existing deficiencies in its major streets transportation system which create congestion and traffic safety problems; and WHEREAS, said transportation deficiencies adversely affect our quality of life and inhibit economic development in Washington County; and WHEREAS, the Washington County Transportation Coordinating Committee, consisting of City, County and State officials, have identified priority projects aimed at addressing the most serious existing ' transportation deficiencies; and WHEREAS, the Waa�hington County Transportation Coordinating Committee has recommended a Major Street Transportation Improvement Program, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, said Program is designed to benefit all of Washington County; and S' WHEREAS, said Program should be endorsed by this City and recommended that the Washington County Board of Commissioners place aefore the voters a bond measure as soon as feasible to implement the Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: The City of Tigard, Oregon recommends that the Washington County Board of Commissioners place before the voters a bond measure as soon as feasible to implement the Major Streets Transportation Improvemmeen-pts,Program. PASSED: This /"" day of 1995. or — City of Tigard ATTEST m -f - cputy City Recorqder — City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 65—_ lw/1731P a -S 08 0 4 8 3 8 Sit a O 7 � �Ae is � ttoy� �H O W 6 A W �D• C.� �. 8 q n _ r•. N q T B Q N J AWASSHIoNGTONSCOIUNTY RST AVENUE HILLSBORO, OREGON 97124 DEPT.OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION Administration 2nd Floor (503)648-8761 August 8, 1985 TO Interested Parties FROM Richard A. Daniel s+Director RE MAJOR STREETS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overview Washington County has historically been confronted with three major problems regarding its transportation system: general maintenance of existing facilities, improving heavily used roads to resolve todays safety and congestion problem, and expand the system to meet the ever increasing demands of growth traffic demand. The Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program (MSTIP) has been designed to begin to address the second problem, improving roads to meet todays existing deficiencies. The Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation was directed to prepare a comprehensive transportation project list that reflected priority transportation improvements throughout Washington County and funding alternatives which could ultimately be presented to the voters in November 1985. The recommended projects presented in the MSTIP in no way address all of the required transportation improvements needed today in Washington County. The total transportation system needs in the County have been estimated to require in excess of $300 million. However, the $62.3 million project list does represent an effective program aimed at responding to current traffic problems and im:rediate development pressures. One of the most attractive elements of the MSTIP is the fact that the $62.3 project list actually represents $90 million in transportation improvements. This added return on the project investment occurs as a result of using portions of the MSTIP funds to match available federal transportation funds. Failure to provide the required local match means the federal highway funds will revert to other counties in the region or other states. an equal opportunity employer !�u®c MSTIP August 8, 1985 Page 2 Fundino There are two general methods of financing road improvements using property tax revenues; a Serial Levy and General Obligation Bonds. These two options are summarized below as to how they could be applied to the MSTIP. Both levy rates provided are estimates based upon a set of assumptions regarding inflation rates, interest rates, etc. Once the final MSTIP amount is established, the levy rates will be determined based upon the amount of the levy and the mechanism (serial levy or bond levy) selected. Serial Levy: The Washington County Transportation Coordinating Committee has recommended using a serial levy which is an amount of money collected annually for a specified number of years. According to ORS 280.060, if the amount of the levy is relatively uniform throughout the period during which the taxes are levied, the levy may be authorized by the voters for up to ten years if the money is to be used for other than operating purposes. in other words, a levy for road improvements can be approved for up to ten years as long as the amount levied per year is relatively uniform. ( In order to implement the $62.3 million MSTIP over a ten year period, a total of $88 million would need to be levied ($8.8 million annually) to cover project inflation over that period. This would result in a tax rate of $0.96/$1000 valuation in year one. This rate, over the 'ten year period, would drop to $0.80/$1000 in year ten, due to annual increases in the countywide assessed valuation. Based on these figures, a $70,000 house would pay $67.00 in year one and $56.00 in year ten. General Obligation Bond: An alternative to the serial levy is a bond levy which is an amount of money, approved by voters, which is used to pay principal and interest on tax free municipal bonds sold by the local government. Bonds commonly have 10, 20 or 30 year maturity terms. Since the MSTIP is effectively a five to ten year improvement program, the ten year bond example was selected for evaluation. One advantage of a bond over a serial levy is the fact that bonds can be sold immediately following voter approval and project can, therefore, be built sooner, thereby saving project inflation costs. Based upon this fact, in order to implement the $62.3 million MSTIP, a bond sale of $79.5 million would be required (some project inflation has been assumed). This would result in a tax rate of $0.99/$1000 in year one. This rate would vary annually depending on factors associated with the bond sale. The maximum estimated rate in any one year would be $1.19;$1000 and the lowest rate would be $0.46/$1000. Over the life of the bond, it is estimated that the average annual rate w`11 be $0.81/$1000. Based on this average rate, a $70,000 house would i3y an average rate of $57.00 annually over the tLrm of the bond. MSTIP August 8, 1985 Page 3 , MSTIP Project List In preparing the MSTIP, the Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation worked with the Washington County Transportation Coordinating Committee composed of representatives of city and regional and state governments to identify transportation projects that would address either current problems (congestion, safety hazards, etc.) or respond to immediate development pressures. The projects have been proposed by Washington County and the cities within the County and reflect the improvement priorities of each jurisdiction. As a result of coordinating the MSTIP with the various jurisditions in the County, the majority of the projects proposed benefit more than one jurisdiction. This Executive Summary provides a listing of each of the projects proposed in the MSTIP. Figures 1-4 show the location of the projects. Specific project descriptions can be obtained through either the Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation (Planning Division). As mentioned earlier, the project list represents the priority projects. The County and City will continue to seek funding from other sources such as federal and state. If successful during the next five years c second priority projects can be constructed. JD c: Board of County Commissioners County Administrator Washington County Transportation Coordinating Committee MAJOR STREETS TRANSPORTATION! IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The following project list corresponds to the project ID numbers on Figures 1 - 4. MSTIP Total ID Project Location Amount Amount 1. Maple Street Pacific to T_V. Highway 650,000 1,300,000 2. 24th Avenue Hawthorne to Quince 650,000 1,750,000 3. 4th Avenue Baseline to Adair 4= ,000 91,000 4. 12th Avenue Baseline tc Adair 8,000 17,000 5. N. 14th Avenue Baseline, north to BNRR 41,000 87,000 6. N_ 19th Avenue Baseline to BNRR. 340,000 340,000 7. Rural Improve- Various locations 3,000,000 3,000_,000 ment Program S. Highway Bridge Various locations 250,000 2,500,000 Replacement 9. East Main 9th to Brookwood 3,500,000 3,500,000 10� 28th Avenue Cornell to East Main 800,t. ) 800,000 11. Tualatin Valley 21st Ave_ to Oak St. 2,050,000 =,850,000 Highway 12_ Cornell Road 185th to Cornelius Pass 2,800,000 2,800,001 Road 13. Cornell Road 158th Ave. to 185th Ave. 1,900,O00 1,900,000 14. Cornell Road Saltzman Road to 158th Z,20O,0Oo 3,200,000 Avenue 15. 185th Avenue Rock Creek Blvd to T.V. 6,550.000 16,15O,00O 16. Murray Blvd. Cornell Rd. to Sunset Soo,00o 500,000 Highway 17. Murray Bl Vd. Sunset Hwy- to Jenkins 900'000 6.100.000 18. Murray Blvd. BNRR Overpass 2,100,000 :,100,000 19. Farmington Rd. Murray Blvd_ to 209th 4,400,000 8,300,000 20. Cedar Hills/ Intersection 3OO,0oc) 300,000 Wal ker Road 21. Uptown Central Beaverton 300,000 300,000 Improvements Locations 22. Lombard Farmington Rd. to 1,100,000 1,100,00O Extension Canyon Road 23. Hall Blvd_ Allen Blvd. to Greenway 1,500,000 2,400,000 24. Hart Rd.lBany Murray Blvd. to 185th 2,000,000 2,000,000 Rd. Ave. 25. Sa.hol1s Ferry Fanno Creel: to Murray 1,770,000 3,770,000 Rd- Blvd. ----- ..... MAJOR STREETS TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM MSTIP Total ID Project Location Amount Amount 26. Greenburg Rd. 99W at Greenberg Rd. 250,000 250,000 27. Hall Blvd. Bike 99W to Durham Rd. 5001.000 5c)0,000 28. bull Mtn./99W Intersection 360,O00 500,000 29. Durham Rd. 99W to Carmen 3.700,000 :x,700,000 30. Lower Scones Tualatin River to I-5 1,265,000 1,265,000 Ferry Rd. 31. Tualatin- Edv Rd. to Boones Ferry 6,230,(D00 6,230,000 Sherwood Rd. Rd. 32. Edy Road Tualatin-Sherwood to 99W 2,3O0,000 2,300,000 33. Oregon Street Pine to Murdock 6OO,00c) 600,000 34. Western Bypass Engineering Study 300,000 300,000 Study 35. MSTIP Reserve All Projects Eligible 6,000,000 6,000,000 TOTAL atx 62 - ,375,000 9O,3..t)0,000 MAJOR STREETS WASHINGTON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM UNIFIED CAPITAL PROJECT INDEX IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM r SOURCE: WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT FIGURE I OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION.7885 WASFIINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION P LAN NI NC. DIVISION • JULY,1985 15 16 17 24 \ I r f. 25 RURAL OVERLAY.P OGRAM% / •! t rte' $HIGHWAY BR•JOCE PFftN9FMEN J-34 S U (PRO)CTSFTO BE DETERM.IED14 an! 8 27 ^+• �/'�?. tel . !,1131 }' PRO)EGT LOCATION -I V.+Fit ........ STUDY AREA COUNTY LINE ------ CITY LIMITS r .. xs09xx! —^—�— URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY x rots \-L 1 i J � Z LU ~ ins :D< Y �/ ops u. W V1 F R / L`•f" Z H.—z LLi anv titer ®� u Z ins wli� 2 inv w16,Z t'O s'•-i �—, Z Z O f i---- --- > �u� r >� `O t- ll - � f tt Lbz CD LU LU cc 0 > } ` !--� I 7 D U c 1- co O L` � I � GQ '\ I 'o < >.Ic z® yam' H CN _ O 00 Ly gj CW �6 QLL ,no j1 MAJOR STREETS WASHINGTON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM UNIFIED CAPITAL NORTH WASHINGTON IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM COUNTY PROJECTS FIGURE 3 SOURCE. WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION. 1984 WASHINCTON COUNTY " "^'•••'• "•""'" DEPARTMENT Or LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION P LA N N I NC DIVISION • JULY, 7985 iV west {-.._ ( \ Union �vE\ A 1 I svPw MUIfNOMON CO_ �/ f •h��n�k410k CO F —I I j I = u r 12 13 - 14 L T- ui i I 6\.. L1 si f 1 Jr L_ — w rrw v Cr�Nwr .o..nsol sr H3 ---) Alona 1 I - `� a a 2 -19 E _ I- s j Be vertdn G _ rP�iP Cay. C _ ltEw� acv I 23 oFN..E I a'�pc lr R I h /-14 24 I o �_ r NORTHMILES 0 1 Z 4 R E! PROJECT LOCATION igar ........... STUDY AREA e�dr M.o.a s. 27•E s CITY LIMITS ml MAJOR STREETS WASHINGTON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION IMPaOVEMENT PROGRAMA UNIFIED CAPITAL SOUTH WASHINGTON IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM COUNTY PROJECTS FIGURE 4 COUNTY DEP OF LAND USE ANDURCE, WASHINGTRANSPORTATION.TON 1984ENT WASHINGTON COUNTY .,,... +�+,... „ .���w.w•........... DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE ANL TRANSPORTATION ..,. PLANNING DIVISION • JULY,1985 Aiona 19 Be vertdn pJ � - aOBEOa:E o �° N °B<v+m I type 23 OEwwE ° r 24 j I .,a°EEso e —E-r o I / 21 Farmington WI W I p .�L1 25 oaw sr scaois .r Igar e.0 27 f 4�� Aim in ig ✓l 1 '1 ,301 t E.- pN+ Tualat ©©T� 133 a° NORTH 6 _ J, it [7 L�I sr s.cfn ; 32r a✓l MILES g t R ; I p��s_ 1 1 /; Ir i• '�� 111 I V ° Sher SUroSf r �8�v PROTECT LOCATION - ( +++++.+.+++ STUDY AREA CITY LIMITS roozE an ao <t I