Loading...
Resolution No. 83-60 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 83- 66 DECLARING AN INTENTION TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN AN AREA DETERMINED TO BE A SEWER IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE KNOWN AS SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 42 FOR S.W. 68th PARKWAY (FRANKLIN TO ATLANTA); DESCRIBING THE PROBABLE TOTAL COST THEREOF: DEFINING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WORK AND ESTIMATES OF THE CITY'S ENGINEER, AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING AND DIRECTING THE GIVING OF NOTICE THEREOF. WHEREAS, the City Council has accepted a petition requesting sanitary sewer improve- ments and has ordered preparation of a preliminary engineering report, pursuant thereto, at the Council's regular meeting of June 13, 1983, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 13.04 of Tigard Municipal Code, City Council finds it expedient and necessary to order the improvement of the hereinbelow described lands by construction of sanitary sewer facilities and appurtenances thereto, and pursuant thereto the City's Engineer has submitted to the Council plans, specifications anc estimates for the work to Se doge and the probable cost thereof together with a statement of the lots, parts of lots and parcels of land to be benefitted and the apportionment of the total cost of the improvements which each of said lots, parts of lots and parcels of land shall be assessed on account of the benefits derived; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that said plans, specifications and estimates are satis- factory. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TIGARD AS FOLLOWS: (a) That the City Council does hereby deem it expedient and necessary, and does hereby declare its intention to improve the aforsaid portion of S.W. 68th PARKWAY by construction of sanitary sewer facilities and appurtenances thereto. to wit: That all lands situated within the boundaries described on the attached "EXHIBIT A" are determined and proposed to be a sanitary sewer improvement assessment district, to be known as "S.W. 68th PARKWAY Sanitary Sewer Improvement District No. 42" and it is further proposed that each lot, part of lot and parcel of land within said boundaries will be especially benefitted by said improvements, and that the total estimated cost of$136,800 for said improvements, shall be assessed in full, on an equal rate (per acre) against all lands within said improvement district. That all plans, specifications and estimates with respect to the sewer improvements as submitted by the City's engineers be, and the same are hereby proposed to be adopted and ordered to be maintained on file by the City Recorder for public inspection. (b) That Monday, the 25th of July , 1983, at the hour of 8:00 p.m., at Fowler Junior High School Lecture Room, 10865 SW Walnut, Tigard, Oregon, be and the same are hereby set as the time and place for hearing and considering objections or remon- strances to the proposed improvement by any parties aggrieved thereby. PASSED: By Council on this _Z- day of �4�,, 1983. ,. ATTEST- e, Mayor Recorder - City of Ti RE307,UTIO3, ti0. 83 - ■ LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR S.W. 68th SANITARY SEWER LOCAL IMPROVEMENT 9ISTRICT EXHIBIT A A tract of land located in "WEST PORTLAND HEIGHTS", a recorded plat being located in the S.E. s of Section 36, TIS, R1W and the N.E. 34 of Section 1, T2S, R1W, W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as SFr follows: Beginning at the S.W. corner of Lot 24, Block 22, said plat, thence on the west Zine of said Lot 24 North 100 feet to the N.W. corner thereof; thence on the north line of Lot 23, said Block 22, S 88' 53' W 25 feet to the N.W. corner thereof, thence North 2236.7 feet to the N.W. corner of Lot 24, Block 2, said plat, said the south ri ht"of-way line of S.W. Atlanta Street, thence on said pvi��t 'e�r�g a .. right "of-way line N. 880 53' E 620 feet to the N,'E. corner of Lot 24, Block 4, said plat, said point being on the west right-of-way line of S.W. 66th Avenue; Fx thence on said right-of-way line south 1998.9 feet to the S.E. corner of Lot 8, Block 24, said plat; thence S 88° 53' W 360 feet to the N.W. corner of Lot 36, t Block 23, said plat; thence south 250 feet to -the S.E. corner of Lot 18, said Block 23; thence S 880 53' W 130 feet to the centerline of S.W. 68th Avenue; thence on said centerline south 100 feet to the north right-of-way line of S.W. Franklin tIF' Street; thence S 88° 53' W 105 feet to the point of beginning. 1 2 { S S g!� Ili i f S"W. 68th PARKWAY SANITARY SEWER L.I.D. {i 42 SCOPE: This report summarizes staffs' evaluation of the feasibility� liY of constructing a ...^, :public main-line sanitary sewerage facility running generally north-south along {�,.�;;• S.W. 68th Parkway, from S.W. Franklin Street to S.W. Atlanta Street, serving lands Yi f; situated adjacent to 68th Parkway and lands immediately easterly thereof, within . the eastern protion of the area commonly known as the Tigard Triangle. LID BOUNDARY: The proposed L_I_D. is located in the northeast quarter of Section 1, T2S, R1W, W.M. f"=2 and in the Southeastuarter q of Section 36, T1s, R1W, W.N.; see Figure #1. All tax .cr'*;:"• lot numbers are from Washington County Assessor's maps. The "y P proposed L.I.D. bound- ary encompasses only those parcels of land which directly benefit by installation of ?: �,• the sewerage facility by �--=�.�ate ava fart ' ed ilabi1ity of service to each ownership (the term -owner-ship-is more specifically defined under the topic heading "Ownerships")_ EXISTING CONDITIONS The relationship of the proposed sanitary sewerage improvement and the district a comprehensive land use plan is shown on figure 82. Generally, the land slopes downward, laterally, across the project, from East to West, at an approximate 7% grade in the northerly portion of the project area and at an approximate 4% grade in the southerly portion of the project area; also, the land Slopes downward longitudinally along the length of the project, from north to south, at an approximate 38 grade. Parcels of land within the project area are, for the most part, undeveloped. Older, single family dwelling units are acattered along S.W. 68th Parkway_ Said Parkway is p' a sixty foot wide dedicated.public right-of-way and, likewiseis f F, , or the mostpart, undeveloped also; through vehicular travel therealong is not possible due to 68th's alternating unimproved and semi-improved (gravel) segmentation. The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) has received bids for construction of ti •� roadway improvements along Atlanta Street and along 68th Parkway as a part of the y"..c. .��:. I-S freeway improvements (in the vicinity of Dartmouth Street). ODOT predicts 6,000 vehicles per day on 68th Parkway by the year 2000. It is obvious that installation of public main line sanitary sewerage facilities �Y-r•- thecealong should be done prior to ODOT•s road installation work. i4r OWNERSHIPS- Within the boundary of the proposed sanitary sewerage district, there are 68 separate parcels of land; but, in terms of "ownerships" there are 31 The object herein being is provision of public sanitary sewerage service to each physically isolated ownership and each physically clustered ownership within the district. It ;f`' `is absolutely necessary to have that service concept clearly understood. ✓..J_ !Ownerships within and assessed value of the district is shown on Table # 1. t BENEFITS• w. Within the boundary of the proposed sanitary sewerage district, each ownership is provided with the opportunity to make a direct connection to the proposed public sewerage facility and, subsequently, should be considered to have been directly benefitted and assessable for a fair share portion of the total cost of said facility. (t-The'proposed district boundary is described on the attached Exhibit "A".) S�> ASSESSMENT METHOD: - The assessment method proposed to be applied is based on private ownership acreage, to wit . . .1) Total Project Cost b Total Acreage = Cost per Acre then, 2) Cost per Acre X Individual Tax Lot Acreage = Parcel Assessment_ (ESTIMATED) COST: The estimated total cost of the proposed public sewerage facility is $ 136.800 Said cost is detailed in Table # 2 (ESTIMATED) ASSESSMENT DISTRIBUTION: n The distribution of estimated assessments per ownership, is illustrated in Table k 3. Such was computed using the aformentioned Estimated Total Cost and the Assessment Mt•t,ht>t! Ul':IJP x.5111 I' 6 ASS KSS[:I, VALU A•r•r,JN ' TAX TA 131.F. K 1 (. .OT M MAP 4NAME VALUATION LAND IMP. S.D. NO. 1. 100 IAA D.J.B., INC. - 2. 1400 lAA •. 127,500 51 3. 1301 IAA 39,000 - 53 .• 4. 0600 36DD 26,000 100 59 •. 4,000 - 44 5. 4900 36DD .• 6- 5000 36DD •• 5,000 - 47 7. 5100 36DD •• 4,000 - 46 8- 5800 36DD •. 4,000 - 45 9. 1700 lAA 14,000 - 48 •• 0. 1200 lAA 129,500 - 50 •• 67,600 - - 60 1. 5700 36DD G- B.11 2. 6600 36DD 20,000 13,000 49 •• Ct 18,100 17,000 40 �p0 36DD G. L- Ball & Bank of Calif. 4,000 - C1 4- 1900 1AA Donald E. & Julia Gail Pollock 3,800 - 55 5- 1300 36DD .. S. 6700 36DD .. 6,000 - 7 7- 6600 36DD .. 4,000 - 39 •• 4,000 - 38 3- 3300 36DD Donald E. & Doris B. Hartig 4,000 - 16-18 3. 3301 36DD •• •• 18,101 28,200 17 1400 35DD John E. & Janine 1-1. King 4,000 _ . 6 2600 36DD Boyd D. & Donna Johnson 18,100 29,700 lg '.. 3001 36DD Ramona Eileen Alvarez 20,200 47,700 31 t. 3200 36DD Irving L. & Jennie E. Larson 6,000 _ 21 I. 390 36DD .. •• '- �O 36DD 18,100 27,300 20 •• •. 6,000 - 29 X402 36DD .- 30,200 61,300 22 3500 36DD •. 20,200 21,800 30 i OWNERSHIP & ASSESSED VALUATION i TABLE N 1 ( :AX VALUATION LOT MAP N NAME LAND IMP. Z.D. NO. :8. 3700 36DD Irving G Jennie E. Larson 20,200 21,800 23 '99:5300 36DD " 12,000 - 34-37 3600 20,200 24,200 33 ylTxs.: .�.w55y00 36DD ^ 4,000 - 43 .rte?::�..... it6000 36DD 4,800 - 36 3. 3201 36DD State of Oregon - - 70 4. 3404 36DD •• - - 69 5:. 5301 36DD " - - 68 b� :5901 36DD " - - 67 e :;:... T>`.5200 36DD - - 35 8?`- 70 36DD - - 42 ( ( .. 400 lAA Ford Leasing Dev. Co. 537,900 524,300 52 0:.3800 36DD Erhart Steinborn 55,000 69,400 13 1=::.'4400 36DD 20,700 - 14 2:; 4100 36DD Anne Leiser 6,000 - 26 3. 200 36DD 20,200 20,100 2 4_ 301 36DD Margaret A. Mattson 2,000 - • 81 s_ 400 36DD 2,000 - 9 500 36DD 19,200 39,000 10 6100 36DD Robert S. & Harriett Hogg 30,200 51,500 32 3403 36DD Diane L. Baldwin 4,000 - 28 3600 36DD Judy Lorraine Strogny 4,000 - 27 3900 36DD John K. & Ila J. Wardin & 20,200 21,200 15 C.F. & Marina E. Wardin • Erhart 700 36DD L • ewis J. & Jennie O. Buchols'Steinborn 20,200 34,800 24 4300 36DD Doris Philip & Louise Tazer 22,200 31,800 25 t Frederick Cooper i. 100 36DD Stephen L. St_ Clair 18,100 25,800 1 i OWNERSHIP 6 ASSESSED VALUATION TABLE M 1 TAX `.LOT k MAP p VALUATION NRME LAND ZMP I.D. NO. 5+1. 600 36DD Tigard Water District _ 12 '00 36DD Barbara Anderson 20,200 13,400 3 .900 36DD Lawrence Estes 6 Dolores Dorthy Greene 20,200 51,800 5 57. :800 36DD Family Baptist Church _ _ 4 58. 801 36DD •• .. 59- 2000 1AA Marvin F. & JoAnn Winters 3,800 56 50.. 2100 IAA •• „ _ 3,800 - 57 it 2200 IAA 3,800 - 58 4500 1AA Roy W. 6 Ardelle C. Anderson 21,300 28,400 66 1r� 5500 IAA John K. Wardin 80,000 - 65 "4800 IAA Bruce H. & Debra H. Bartlett John F. 6 Mary A. Wardin 36,00 64 IAA 5. 5200 24,000 - 62 6z 5300 IAA •. `=_ » 48,000 - 63 1800 IAA Max W. 6 Marlene A. Landon 21,300 39,500 54 3_ 401 IAA Ronald Dychen 237,700 - 61 4 ESTIMATED TOTAL COST ( (TABLE NO. 2) ITEM UNIT EST. UNITS EST. UNIT PRICE EST_ COST 1)• Clearing & Grubbing L.S. All - S 2,000 �-�2-Yi.•;_Trench Excavating L-F. 4600 3.00 13,800 V`7Fi-=.-draviel.Base � Pipe zone L.F. 4600 G.F. 2_50 11,500 "a) Trench, Rock Backfill L.F. 4600 L.F. 9.00 41,400 �5) 8" Pipe, in place L.F. 3400 L.F. 7.00 23,800 , 6) 6" Pipe, in place L.F. 1200 L.F. 6.00 7,200 7) 48" Precast M-H. w/R&C, in place Ea 10 1,000.00 10,000 )' Connect @ Exist. H.H. Ea 1 500.00 500 .:Pavement R 6 R L.F. 800 L.F. 7.00 5,600 Contingency - - - 3,150 �.`..t Est. Payment to Contractors _ _ _ . . . 118,950 _._ SUMMARY. (Estimate): Payment to Contractors S 118,950 Engineering 7,900 • Interest on Warrants 2,500 Legal 1,780 Financial 595 Clerical 595 Admin, Advertize, Print., etc. 1,780 Contingency 2,700- . Estimated Total Project Cost: S 136,800 .0 ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT DISTRIBUTION (TABLE NO. 3) T.L. NO. NAME AC- ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT 100 (1AA) D.J.B. INC. .683 S 4,498 1400 (1AA) •• .339 2,232 1301 (1AA) .229 1,508 4000 (36DD) _14 922 4900 (36DD) _24 1.581 5000 (36DD) 15 988 5200 (36DD) .18 1,185 5800 (36DD; _45 2,963 1700 (1AA) _671 4,419 _ 1200 (1AA) .. �S g.Z•16.0 3,932 Ct SUB TOTAL:$ 24,228 5700 (36DD) G.L. Ball -3.923 1,976 6600 (36DD) -207 1,363 SUB TOTAL: S 3,339 6500 (36DD) G-L_ Ball 6 Bank of Calif. _051 1900 (1AA) D.E. .6 J.G. Pollock _115 S 757 1300 (36DD) - 172 1,I33 J� 6700 (360D) '• - 103 678 6600 (360D) . 103 671, SUBTOTAL: s ...yam ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT DISTRIBUTION (TABLE NO. 3) r T.L. NO. NAME AC. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT 3300 (360D) D.E. & D.B. Hartig .295 S 1,943 3301 (36DD) .160 1,054 SUB TOTAL. S 2,997 _ (` ..Y 1400 (36DD) J. & J_ King .115 $ 757 2600 (36DD) B.D. & D. Johnson _344 S 2,265 3001 (36DD) R.E. Alvarez .295 $ 1,943 3200 (36DD) I-L. & J.E. Larson' .224 S 1,475 -�t 3290 (36DD) ^ .115 757 3400 (36DD) " .229 1,508 402 (36DD) ^ .682 4,491- 3500 ,4913500 (36DD) " .209 1,376 3700 (36DD) .231 1,521 5300 (36DD) .436 2,871 5400 (36DD) .204 1,343 5900 (36DD) - .029 191 6000 (36DD) " .172 1,133 SUB TOTALIS 16,666 3201 (36DD) State of Oregon -006 5 40 3404 (36DD) .006 40 5301 (36DD) " .023 151 ® 5901 (36DD) .200 1,317 • 5200 (3600) _229 1,508 5500 (360D) .172 1,133 SUB TOTALIS 4,189 1 ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT DISTRIBUTION 2 (TABLE NO. 3) T.L. No. NAME AC. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT 400 (IAA) Ford Leasing 2.95 19,428 3800 (36DD) E. Sceinborn .287 5 1';890 400 (36DD) .229 1,508 SU-3 TOTAL: $ 3,398 4100 (36DO) A. Leiser .365 $ 2,404 200 (36DD) •• .325 2,140 SUB TOTAL: 5 4,544 '�.`,•;; ;_:.. 301 (36DD) M. A. Mattson .057 $ 375 400 (36DD) .057 375 ® F.? 500 (36DD) '- .220 1,508 : ( SUB TOTAL: 5 2,258 s 6100 (36DD) R-S. & H: Hogg .203 1,337 3403 (36DD) D-L. Baldwin .115 757 3600 (36DD) J.L. Strojny .115 757 3900 (36DD) J.K. & I.J_ Wardin & G F. & MSE. Wardin .172 1,133 • Erhart Steinborn 4000 (36DD) L.J. & J.O_ Buchols .287 1,890 4300 (36DD) D., P. & L_ Tazer .344 2,265 a Frederick Cooper ,Do ...,DD) S-L. St. .365 2.404 600 (36DD) Tigard Water District .344 2,265 ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT D.........--TION (4. (TABLE NO. 31 T.L. NO. NAME AC. ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT 700 (36DD) J.A. & M.M_ Martin by V.B. Stevens .296 $ 1,949 "-. 900 (36DD) L.-Estes & D.D. Greene .335 2;;206 c BOO. (36DD) Family Baptist Church .743 g 4,893 801 (36DD) •• .265 1,745 N•,: SUB TOTAL. 5 6,638 200 (1AA) M.F. & J_ Winters .172 $ 1,133 t{ 2100 (LAA) .115 757 -2200 (1AA) _229 1,508 It y SUB TOTAL. 5 3,398 `l4: . '4500 UAA) R.W_ & A.C. Anderson .172 1,133 5500 (lAA) J.K. Wardin _459 3.023 4800 (JAA) B.H. & D-A_ Bartlett & J.F_ & N.A_ Wardin .115 $ 757 5200 (lAA) _ _225 1,508 5300 (1AA) .459 3,023 SUB 'TOTAL: $ 5,288 1800 (1AA) M.N. & M.A_ Landon .384 2,530 401 . (lAA) R. Dyches Century 21 Homes Inc. 1.25 8,233 TOTALS. -- 20.773 Ac, i S 136,800 all L31 IL I J D EJ LIF L --;s�,—.13 STM —mv -3- ir 'ro I LV i-!-ss- ro ro 04 r O-CE, w I M r -� a mass _ m g 7 �a �� -mma.m+w -'gON �mrew Mrs mm "M F,� - a damw P- im lm W 1.11 VA JS fps» �75 ® Sammi F7 � � a r _ F ; - e.