Ordinance No. 92-26 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 92- 0-
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE (ZCA 92-
02) (ANDERSON) AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
eived a request for annexation signed by Phyllis M-
WHEREAS, the City has rec
Anderson, who is the owner of the subject parcels; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Comprehensive flan May Changes from Commercial
Professional, and Low Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential in
August of 1992.
The Cit Council held a public hearing on September 22, 1992 to consider
•atAon re est and to consider zoning designations for the properties;
the a:aiiv:.--- �
and ,.. 4- forwarding
WHEREAS, on September 22, 1992 the City Council approvea a re lut__n
ea Local Government Boundary
the annexation to the Portland Metropolitan Ar
Commission; and
WHEREAS, the zoning district designation as set forth in Section 1 below is thaas
t
which most closely conforms to Tigar
Urbhe anoi
Planning Area Agreemon County zoning enta and the
provided in the Washington County- g
recently approved City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The recommendation ofthe
10�1n2ngandstaff
10.1.3set oforth
the�Citylow is
consistent with Policy
Comprehensive Plan (See attached Zone Change Exhibit).
Tax MaRILot Number Current Zoning Prc sed Zonis
2S1 1OAC, 1300/1400 Wash. Co. R-6
Tigard R-25
2S1 lOSD, 2100 (2.74 AC.)
2S1 10SD, 1600/ Wash. Co. R-6 Tigard R-4.5
2100 (.63 AC.)
Section 2: The property meets the definition for a developing area as
defined in Chapter 18.138 of the c u+munity Development ,....de and
shall be designated as such on the development standards area
map.
Section 3: This ordinance shall orA bew; he effective oice of the filing cretary of State.
annexat1(,S{ liaafit yr
PASSED: By ' "A-14A A nMrt�1 vote of all Council members present after
sing read by number and title only, dais `%1Y waY
ey, w e c orr w
n
dayof ; 1992.
APPROVED: This L. -
era R, Ewa , Mayor
Approved as to forms
TC y ttorney
2
Date
STAFF REPORT
September 22, 1992
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
TIGARD TOWN HALL
13125 S.W. HALL BOULEVARD
TIGARD, OREGON 97223
A. CASH. Zone Change Annexation 92-02
REQUEST: To annex four parcels totalling approximately 7.7 acres of
unincorporated Washington County into the City of Tigard, and for zone
change from Washington County R-6 (Residential, 6 units per acre) to City
of Tigard R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units per acre), and R-25 (Residential,
25 units per acre).
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: City of Tigard Low Density Residential/
Medium High Density Residential.
ZONING DESIGNATION: Washington County R-6 (Residential, 6 units per
acre).
APPLICANT: Phyllis M. Anderson
11550 3W Bull Mountain Road
Tigard, Oregon 97223
OWNER(S): Phyllis M. Anderson
13550 SW Bull Mountain Road
Tigard, Oregon 97223
LOCATION: South aide of Bull Mountain Road, bertwee n 500 and 1100 feet
west of Pacific Highway. WCTM 2S1 10AC, tax lots 1300, 1400
and 2S1 1OBD, tax lots 1600. 21nn_ -
2. Background Information
The subject properties are within Washington County but are within
the City of Tigard's active planning area under the terms of the
Urban Planning Area Agreement between the City and County. In
August, 1992 the City of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan Map was changed
to designate tax lots 1300, 1400 and a 2.74 acre portion of 2100 for
Medium High Density Residential use. At the same time, a .63 acre
portion of tax lot 2100 and the 1.17 acre tax lot 1600 were
designated for Low Density Residential use. Washington County
ZCA 92-02 Staff Report 1
o
currently has all of the subject properties zoned R-6 (Residential,
6 units per acre).
3. Vicinity Information 3
Properties to the north of the site are in the City of Tigard and s
are zoned R-2 (Residential, 2 units per acre). Properties to the s
south are zoned R-40 (Residential, 40 units per acre) and are in the
City of Tigard. Property to the east is in the City of Tigard and f
is zoned C-P (Professional Commercial). All properties to the west
are single family lots in unincorporated Washington County, and are
zoned R-6 (Residential, 6 units per acre)
a
4. Site Information. and Proposal Description �
The properties to be annexed have one single family residence with }
the remainder of the properties undeveloped. The properties are
primarly covered with trees and other natural vegetation.
The applicant requested that her parcels be annexed into the City of
Tigard in order to develop and to serve all the property with
sanitary sewer. An existing sewer line is located at the northeast
corner of the parcels to be annexed.
}�R
5. Acencv and. NPO Comments
Tigard Water District, Tualatin Valley Fire District, Washington
County Land Use and Transportation, General Telephone and
Electronics, NW Natural Gas, Tigard School District 23J, Portland
General Electric, and Metro Area Comminications Commission have _
raviewed the proposal and offer no objections or comments. The
Neighborhood Planning Organization commented on the Comprehensive
Plan change but offered no comment on the annexation.
6. Police Departments Consideration
The Police Department has reviewed the proposal and have offered no
objections or comments_
No other comments were received. r
k
1
B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies
2.1.1, Citizen Involvement; 6.4.1, Developing Areas; 10.1.1, Service
Delivery Capacity; and 10.1.2, Boundary Criteria and Tigard Community
Development Code chapters 18.136, Annexations; and 16.138,
Established/Developing Area Classification. The planning staff has
i
ZCA 92-02 Staff Report
+- 2
)
R
determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of
the Tigard Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings noted belowt
1. Plan Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning
Organization and community Planning organization as well as
surrounding property owners were given notice of the hearing and an
opportunity to comment on the request.
2. Plan Policy 6.4.1 is satisfied because the annexation will be
designated as an developing area on the development standards map.
3. Plan Policy 10.1.1 is satisfied because the City has conducted the
Washington County Urban Services Study which includes the subject
properties. This study indicates that adequate services are
available in the vicinity and may be extended to accommodate the
subject properties.
4. Plan Policy 10.1.2 is satisfied because the annexation will not
create an irregular boundary that makes it difficult for the police
in an emergency situation to determine whether the parcels are
within or outside the City. The land is located within Tigard's
Active Planning Area, and adequate service capacities can be made
available to accommodate the eventual development of the properties
as noted above.
The planning staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the
relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon the
findings noted below:
1. Section 18.136.030 of the Code is met because all facilities and
services can be made available, the applicable Comprehensive Plan
policies discussed above have been satisfied and the properties has
been determined to be a Developing area in accordance with the
critaris in Chapter 18.138 of the Code®
The Urban Planning Area Agreement between the City and 'Washington
County res 'a_res that when annexing land within the City's active
planning area, the City adopt a zone designation which most closely
resembles the County plan and zone designation. In this case, the
l propoued zoning complies with the recently adopted City
Comprehensive Plan change.
2. Chapter 18.138 of the Code is satisfied because the properties meet
the definition for a Developing area and shall be designated as such
on the development standards area map.
1r 2CA 92-02 Staff Report 3
tr
b
a
C. OTHER ALTERNATIVES
1. The properties to be annexed are currently undeveloped. The
planning staff reviewed the implications of annexing the properties
as undeveloped land, versus annexing it as a developed land.
AMEX WqW
a. The development would be subject to City development
requirements, and its fees and charges. The City will provide
development services. The increase in assessed value after
development will lower the City tax rate, and annexing raw
land with one owner will be less difficult than annexing
several new residents and n_rorerty owners.
DELAY ANNEX.'lTION
b. If the City decides to delay the annexation of these
properties until after construction, the County will provide
all development services, and impose County standards on the
development. The City's tax base will be increased by
approximately $9,700 instead of $1,059. This is part of the
permanent tax base that can also be increased by up to 6% each
year.
2. The other alternative the council could consider would be to annex
the subject properties along with the three properties to the west
through a "double majority" method of annexation. Staff is not
recommending this because the properties in the remaining island
will need City sewer to develop plus the properties are in an
island, which means the City can require annexation of the
remaining properties by other methods at a future time. Further,
these properties are mostly undeveloped and therefore are not in
need of urban level services at this time.
D. RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the findings noted above, the planning staff recommends
approval of %CA 92-02, and to adopt the attached rasoluc.ion and ordinance
to
aoywaLd one annexation.to the 8ourdary .Commission.
k
PREPARED BY: p
.�n
victor Adufrri, Assistant Planner
(t ZCA 92--02 Staff Report 4
N M RMS �•, + � � •
46
CA
YO d}Q I'C
vow o3
boo . Ism At
'dtC
4' .
C
o ll
i 7
k
i e ®
_ e1.... S•~t. b_ iMMM111
o-