Ordinance No. 86-22 i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 86- �-
j A FINAL ORDER IN THE MATTER OF 'T'HE. APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT' APPROVAL
REQUESTED BY L'I'NCOLN SAVINGS AND LOAN, FILE NO. S1 - 86, UPHOLDING THE
PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL W1?-F, M01IT," ;�ATivi:S, L.tviL:ni.ili'u" r liuDlN;-;S AND
COTu4LiiS iuNu.
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council heard the above application at
it's Regular Meeting of April 14, 1986 in a review of the Planning, Commission
action of March 4, 1986. The applicant was represented by Norm Harker of
Alpha Engineering. Appearing in opposition were David Homer, Sally LeRoy, Dori
Mangel2i and Dan Leslie and; Phil Pasteris representing NPO ##6.
The Council finds the following facts in this matter: —
WHEREAS, the applicant applied for preliminary plat approval for
an 18 lot subdivision on an 8,68 acre property on the west and east side of
92nd Avenue south of Kneeland Estates II (WCTM 2S1 14A, T. h.. 900)
WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission conducted a hearing on
this matt,!
an
march ". 1096. ?'he comm,it;siion vot-id Lo grant preliminary plat
approval ofS1-86 subject to conditions. The information supporting the
applicant's request, the record of the hearing, and the final order of the
Planning Commission are found in Planning File Number S1-86; arid,
WHEREAS, on March 10, 1986, the application was appealed by
Neighborhood Planning Organization No. 6 for a review of the record before the
Council. A hearing date of April 14, 1986 was later scheduled, and,
WHEREAS, the City Council had be Fore it the record of the
proceeding before the Planning Crr;,mission. 'The matter was brought before the
City Council under Section 18,32.310(b) and 18.32.320. The public hearing was
held on April 14, 1986; and,
WHEREAS, the relevant criteria 'in this case are Tigard
Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3.2.1, 1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4., 8.1.1,
and 8.1.3 and Community Development Code Chapters 18.50, 18.160, and 18.164.
Since the Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged, the Statewide Planning
Goals and Guidelines no longer need to be addressed.
WHEREAS, the City Council concludes that the proposal with minor
modifications is consistent with the relevant portions of the Comprehensive
Plan based upon the Findings noted below:
a. Policy 2.1.1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning
Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice
of the hearing and an opportunity 'to comment on the applicant's
prapasal.
ORDINANCE NO. 86
rays �
r ,
N
b. Policy 3,1.1 will be satisfied provided thai. any port;.-n- of the
lois which exceed 25% slope are not graded or filled without a
Sensitive Lands Permit,
�- Also, the wetlands areas on the site will be evaluated as part of the
required permit from the U.S, Army Corps of Engineers and the Division
land State Lands.
C. Policv 3.2,1 will be satisfied because development within the 100 year
flood plain will be avoided, if any of the proposed street does
encroach upon the flood plain, a Sensitive hands Permit will be required.
d. Policy 7.1.2 can be met when additional information, noted in the
Engineering Division comments, is submitted and appropriate mitigation
measures taken. '
e. Policy 7.3.1 and 7.4.4 are satisfied because adequate water and
sewer facilities are available to the development. The applicant
also indicates that these facilities will be provided within the
subdivision as required by the City standards.
f. Policy 8.1.1 will be met once the termination of Riverwood Lane
at 92nd Avenue is justified or provisions for future extension to
the east are made.
g. Policy 8.1.3 will be satisfied when the conditions of approval relating
to street improvements are completed.
WHEREAS, THE City Council has determined that the proposal is consistent
- with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based upon
inc- 14 ndi n m noted hP l nw.
_ a. Chapter 18.50 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets
all of the cequir8 n"z of the R-4.5 zone.
b. Chapter 18.160 of the Code is satisfied because the proposal meets
the requirements set forth fcr the submission and approval of a
preliminary plat.
C. Chapter 18.164 of the Code will be satisfied during the approval
process for the final plat.
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: TheCityCouncil upheld the Planning Commission decision
based upon the findings, and conclusions above, and approves
of S 1-86 subject to the following conditions:
1. UNLESS OT!•;ERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDITIONS SHALh BE MET PRIOR
TO RECORDING THE FINAI. PLAT.
2. Standard half-street and full street improvements including
sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, driveway aprons, storm drainage
and utilities (delete inapplicable items) shall be installed
along the SW 92nd Avenue frontage. Said improvements alornj
SW 92nd Avenue shall be built to (60' R/W, _36" Pvmt.) City
y� standards including an 8 ft. walk on the west side and conform
to the alignmentof Pxiani,ngimprovemaritr.. the
attached "section which Was app« GU'% . :: ns-land t`atatog
Subdivision development.)
ORDINANCE No. 86-01�
Page 2 ,...
■
Seven (7) sets of plan-profile public improvement construction
plans including a site grading plan a;,d cross sections and one
(1) itemized construction cost estimate, stamped by a Registeired
Professional Civil Engineer, detailing all proposed public
improvements shall be submitted to the Engineering Section for
approval .
4. Sanitary and storm sewer plan-profile details shall be provided
as part of The public improvement plan.
Slope easements along SW Riverwood Lane shall be provided to the
public. Documentation shall be on City forms or on the plat -and
approved by the Engineering Section.
u. The applicant shall provide a stormwater runoff report
fc_:.._ t......, and
addressing proposed onsite and of r sire sivr,�Miate: bVIIbI va o.rl...
soil erosion control (during and after construction); said
report shall also address the impact of upstream drainage
facilities on the site and the mitigation of stormwater damage
to the doulnslope City park and open space lands.
1-4 7 Construction of proposed public improvements shall not commence
until after the Engineering Section has issued approved public
improvement plans. The Sections will require posting of a 100%
Performance bond, the payment of a permit fee and a sign
installation/streelight fee. Also, the ®Yeca-*ie^. of a
construction compliance agreement shall occur prior to, or
concurrently with the issuance of approved public improvement
x plans. SEE THE ENCLOSED HANDOUT GIVING MORE SPECIFIC
r�
::: INFORMATION REGARDING FEE SCHEDULES BONDING AND AGREEMENTS.
8. SW Riverwood Lane will connect with Riverwood Lane in the
development to the west (Copper Creek)
9. Additional right-or"--umay shall be dedicated to -the Public along
the SW 92nd Avenue frontage to increase the right-of-way to 30
feet from centerline. The description for said dedication shall
be tied to the existing right-oF-way centerline as established
by ,Washington County. The dedication_document shall be on City
forms and approved by the Engineering Section. DEDICATION FORMS
AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCLOSED
10. Double frontage Lots 6,7,8, and 11 shall face 93rd Avenue and be
restricted to only one access each on a same public roadway.
11. Lot "116 shall only have direct access onto SW Riverwood Lane.
12. The applicant shall provide a traffic report indicating measures
to be applied to mitigate sight distance' concerns, at the
intersection of Riverwoods Lane and 92nd Avenue, to the
Engineering Section. The Riverwood Laine easterly access shall
be addressed in conjunction' with, this study,!
13. Lots 17 and 19 shall be deleted and half street improvements
will not be required on the east side of 92nd Avenue at this
( time. Half street improvements will be constructed at the time
v=' that Lots ii and is are devzlen4d.
ORDINANCE NO. 86- _--.OL-
Page 3
.� 14. Riv'erwood lane shall be extended to 92nd Avenue with the design
criterion noted in Item #5 of the memo dated 4/3/86 from the City
(Engineer (Exhibit "A:) , will be addressed. Final approval of street
{and parking design shall be granted by the City Engineer.
is. I The property shall be surveyed and the applicant shall dedicate
lands within the 100 year floodplain for greenway purposes.
16. The necessary peshall be obtained from the O.S. Army Corps
of Engineers and the Division of State Lands. The preliminary
plat shall be modified as necessary to accommodate the
condition(s) of approval granted by these two agencies.
;f 17. If allowed through the permit process by the Corps of Engineers
and Division of State Lards, a footpath shall be is)corporated
between Riverwood Lane and Cook Park.
18. Street Centerline Monumentation
S
a. In accordance with ORS 92.060 subsection (2), the centerlines of
all street and roadway rights-of-way shall be monumented before
the City shall accept a street improvement.
b. All centerline' monuments shall be placed in a monument box
conforming to City standards, and the top of all monument boxes
shall be set at design finish grade of said street or roadway.
C. The following centerline monuments shall be set:
(1) All centerline-centerline intersections. Intersections
created with"collector or other existing streets, shall be set
`- " when the centerline alignruent of said "collector' or other
street has been established by or for the City:
(2) Center of all cul-de-sacs.
(3) Curve points, points of intersection (P I) when their
position falls inside the limits of the pavement otherwise
beginning and ending points (B C and E C ). 0
(4) All sanitary and storm location shall be placed in
positions that do not interfere with centerline monumentation.
19. A Sensitive Lands Permit shall bA required for any encroachment
into the 100 vear floodplain or construction in-drainageways or-
slopes over 25%.
20. Lot '12 shall be _subject to the setback andheightrequirements
forflaglots _contained in Sections 18.96.090 and 18.98 of the
Code.
21. A tree cutting permit shall be obtained from the City 'prior to
removing any trees over_6 inches in diameter.
ORDINnNrc NO. e5c
.�
Page 44
4
22. "Local Traffic Only" signs will be allowed at the entrance
l.. to the subdivision at 92nd Avenue.
23. The applicant shall create CC&R's compatible with adjacent
subdivisions of Kneeland Estates and Copper Creek.
24. Itle applicant shall submit to staff for approval a rendering
of a structure (for example but not limited to a brick wall) .`
to indicate that a driver is entering a neighborhood.
r
25. Lots 6, 7, 8, and 11 shall be part of Phase I of the project.
26. After review and approval by the Planning Director and City
Engineer, the Final Plat shall be recorded with Washington
County.
27. This approval is valid if exercised within one year of the
final decision date noted below.
SECTION 2: It is further ordered that the applicant be notified of the
entry of this order.
PASSED: By unanimous vote of all Council members present after being
read by number and title only, this day of May, 1986.
vDeputy City Recorder - City of Tigard.
APPROVED: This _ ' day of May, 1986.
n APO
or - City of Tigard
w
ORDINANCE NO 86 —
- -oma
........... ... ... .
MEMORANDUM ..
`r CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
e
b.
TO: Members of City Council April 3, 1986
FROM: Randy Woolev, Citv Enqineer
SUBJECT: Proposed Plat of Kneeland Estates III
In discussions regarding the proposed plat of Kneeland Estates III, several
concerns have been raised regarding traffic and streets. Based on my research ON
and on discussions at the April 2, 1986 meeting of NPO #6, I have the
following comments:
1. There is a great deal of concern about vehicles traveling at excessive
speeds on SW 92nd Avenue between the Nigh School and Cook Parka This
is apparently an existing pvc blem, not related to the subdivision. It
appears to me that this is a traffic engineering problem which we
should address this summer- as a City problem, rather than as a
subdivision condition.
2. There is a great deal of concern about through traffic on neighborhood
streets. Of special concern is the Comprehensive plan designation of
Riverwood Lane as a minor collector connection between SW 92nd Avenue
and SW 108th Avenue,
I feel that it is a vapid concern. Therefore, I recommend a review of
this portion of the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Map for possible
amendment. The review needs to be initiated -promptly, as several v
developments are contemplated in the area in the near future..
3. There was a question whether Riverwood Lane should be extende_.," ast of
SW 92nd. Review shows that such an extension would require subantial
fill in the floodplain and wetlands areas. A better location for an
eastward access road appears to be approximately 3.50 feet north of
_Riverwood Lane at the top of the hill. I recommend that Riverwood Lane
not be extended eastward from SW 92nd Avenue.
Q, The concept of constructing_ Riverwood Lane as a narrower-than-standard "
i
street was discussed. NPO #6 did not support the idea. Therefore, I
recommend that Riverwood Lane in Kneeland Estates III be designed at
the same width as the existing Rivervood Lane in the adjoining
subdivision (approximately 34 feet).
�I�.G Amy
s
Memo to Council
April 3, 1986
` Page 2
5. There was concern that adequate sight distance be provided on SW 92nd
Avenue for safe traffic operations. A traffic study was suggested to i
address this concern. I feel that we can achieve better results by
specifying certain design criteria, Therefore, I recommend that
Planning Commission Condition No. 12 be amended to read as follows:
17. Tho public improvement plans for SW 92nd Avenue shall
provide a minimum stopping sight distance of 300 feet
along SW 92nd Avenue and a minimum intersection sight
distance of 350 feet for vehicles entering from Riverwood
Lane.
These criteria are based on national standards developed by the American
Association of State Niel-Way and T---spo;tation Officials (AASHTO). The
AASHTO standards are somewhat conservative, thereby providing for the I
fact that some vehicles will exceed the design speed of 35 MPH (the
d current speed limit). These requirements are greater than what we would
usually require on a minor collector such as SW 92nd.
RW 6. There was a request for additional traffic studies to determine existing
traffic volumes and traffic speeds on SW 92nd Avenue. Such studies
dwould be useful in addressing existing traffic concerns on SW 92nd
Avenue, but would probably not help much in deciding how to design
Kneeland Estates III. Therefore, I would questions whether volume/speed
studies should be a condition of subdivision approval.
4
(RRW:br/2436P)