Ordinance No. 85-20 F
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO. 85- .
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT (CPA 5-85) AND A DED CHANGE
EMERGENCY PROPOSED BY THE CITYOF TIGARD
(SANDBURG ROAD/72nd AVE.)
omprehensive Plan Amendment from
Commercial
WHEREAS, the City hab requested a CCommercial
Professional to Light Industrial and a Zone Change from C P
Professional) to I--P (Industrial Park); and f
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal on April 16, I985 and
recommended approval of the amendment fr•r only the central portion of the
subject area (WCTM 2S1 IDC, Tax Lot 1100; WCTM 2S1 1D0, TL 100, 200, 300, 401,
701, and 702); and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before City Council on May 6, 1985 to �
consider the Commission recommendation.
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
discussed
iteria
Section 1: The proposal is consistent
Pl nninghstaffall rreportttorPlanningsCommission r
in the April 16, 1985
�. (Exhibit „A").
Section 2: The City Caupholds he n Commission's
for' approvall of of the Comprehensive Plan L
Amendment as set forth in Exhibit "B" (maps). '
Section 3: Inasmuch as al is necessary tin a tmelyrevise hmanner, san emergency vis
Plan Maps to �a11o+� development
declared to exist and this ordinance shall become effective upon
:. the Mayor.
its passage by Council and approval by
PASSED: By .°3�u i1iLL� vote of all Council members pre` seri afday
being read by
number and title only. this - ----
of a 1985.
t
Aepu�-tyity Recorder - City of Tigard
lt�.� day of -JO2a , 1985.
APPROVED: This A �--�-----
y r - City of Tigard
(KSL:bs/1233P)
ORDINANCE NO, 8b� �
STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.2
Tuesday, April 16, 1985 - 7:30 P.Pi,
TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION
FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL - LGI
10865 S.W. WALNUT
rIGARD, OREGON 97223
A. FACTS
1. General information
CASE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA 5--85) and Zone Change (ZC
6-85).
REQUEST'; Plan amendment from Commercial Professional to Light
.industrial and a zone change from C-P (Commercial
Professional) to I-P (industrial Park).
APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER; See below
LOCATION; Proposal involves 21 tax lots which utilize Sandburg Street
k !
(` for access (WCTM 2S1 iDC, lots 1100, 3700, 3701, .3702, 3703,
3800, 3801, 3900, 4100; WCT"M 2S1 ADD, lots 100, 200, 101,
300, 400, 401, 401A1, 500, 600, 700, 701, 702).
{
2. Sackdr9ound
ThePlanfor NPO # 5 was adopted by the City Council on August 22, 1977,
(Ord. 77--69). The Plan and corresponding zone designations were
t
Industrial Park (M-4) on the north side of Sandburg Street and Heavy
Industriaal (m-2) to the south. Both of these zoning districts allowed
for commercial office and industrial uses.
During the City-wide review of the Comprehensive Plan in 1983, the
zoning for the subject prroperti^s was changed to C---P (Commercial
Professional), with the exception of tax lots 700 and 4100 which
remained Heavy Industrial (1®H),. Along with the change in the map
designation, the list of permitted uses in each zoned was reduced and
the C-P :cone does not allow industriaat uses and I--H zone prohibits
office uses.
On October 29, 1984, tax dots 700 and 4100, owned by Pacific Western
bank were rezoned to'C--P (CPA 21--84, ZC 14-84, Ord. 84-67),
STAFF REPORT - CPA 5-95 & Zr 6. 85 - PAGE 1
3. Vicinity Information
The parcels to the north are zoned C-P (Commercial Professional) and are
developed with office buildings. Highway 217 and 72nd Avenue rp.present
the eastern and western boundaries of the area tinder- consideration. The
parcels immediately west of 72nd Avenue and north of Sandburg Street are
also zoned C-P. The I-P (Industrial Park) zone applies to the
properties located to the southwest and the I-H (Heavy Industrial) zone
lies to the south.
4. Site Information
The 21 parcels that are under consideration have frontage and/or access
to Sandburg Street. The parcels are committed to office use (9 parcels
totaling 12.4. acre), light industrial use (5 parcels totaling 9.3
acres), and vacant (6 parcels totaling 7.2 acres). The office uses are
located at the eastern and western end of Sandburg Street with the
industrial uses situated in the middle. Vacant tracts are randomly
distributed throughout the area.
e
The Plan amendment and zone change are proposed to eliminate the
non-conforming status of the established industrial uses. The I-P zone
is the only district which allows for both office and light industrial
activity. Additional flexibility related to commercial uses in the I-P
zone will be possible if ZOA 3-85 (Agenda Item 5.5) is adopted. in
addition to the change • in the allowed uses, the I-P zone has a more
stringent landscaping requirement of 25% of the lot area, rather than
15% in the C-P zone.
5. Agency and NP0 Comments
City departments have no objection to the proposal.
NPO P 5 had three members present at their meeting and no objections
were raised.
0. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The relevant criteria in this case are Statewide Planning Goals 1, ?,
and 9; and Tigard Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, 5.1.4, 7.1.2. and
12.3.1.
The Planning staff concludes that the proposal is consistent with the
applicable Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines based upon the
following findings:
Goal # 1 is met because the City has adopted a Citizens
Involvement program including review of all development
applications by the Neighborhood Planning Organization (NPO) . In
addition, all pu5lic notice requirements were meat,
S)AFF RB-ORT- CPA 5- SS dt IC 5• W) . _ PAG 2
(
i
l +
b. Goal ti 2 is met because the City applied all applicable Statewide
Planning Goals, City Comprehensive Plan Policies and Development
Code requirements to the application.
C. Goal i7 9 is met because it will remove the non conforming status
of several viable established business to allow for their
continued use and expansion. `
The Planning staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with
the relevant portions, of the Comprehensive Plan based upon the findings
noted below:
(a) Policy 2.1,1 is satisfied because the Neighborhood Planning
Organization and surrounding property owners were given notice of
the hearing and an opportunity to comment on the applicant's
proposal.
(b) Policy 5.1.4 is satisfies because the subject properties are not
adjacent to any residential areas and have been committed to
' non-residential uses for many years.
(c) Policy 7,1.2 is satisfied because adequate services and facilities
are available.
(d) Policy 12.3.1 is satisfied because the subject properties are
separated from the residences on the west side of 72nd Avenue,
t traffic shall not be channeled through residential neighborhoods,
` the grade of the undeveloped parcels is appropriate for light
industrial (or commercial) development, and development of the
vacant parcels under the provisions of the E-P zone should not
have an adverse impact upon adjacent properties.
C. RECGMENDATION
Based upon the findings and conclusions noted above, the Planning staff
recommends approval of CPA 5-85 and iC 6
PREPAidE43 8Y: iter h Li en APPROVED BY: William A. Monahan
Associate Planner Director of Planning &
Development
(1202P/dmj)
j
STAFF REPORT - CPA 5=.85 & ze 6 PAGE 3
.. _ �. -Ale-
' Iif
�� i r ' {--i
h
�BFYE
PHIL
\.. E 1'71. _ F-77_7
i
1 rI
�� ___•-, -J r--IT
1
12
It
( I
't
w
1 / t.� t '1� S.W.1.:1A] GN✓ Ll:.
-I':I I i i int\
. t
IP
e
i
{ B
I ~-
�r
1 a 61
`V co
ml'iti
I y. �!�lc�•r
I"" a
a ,
+ Q' ! R
1
v\O M
a t .i".►,l,eyj z
Witt
' - annw� tru► �,a,Oa.La 'm ... mnr 'Nib„! � �.o �
wm venom
No c o
N u j � ,�. %n'tJ, :..e¢`+{P �'iuT� B 1' {� ate.•
Ot
Q m F
n�
lift =�
O
Rd
si0� n3,9
H"
1�4e w Ll L• �
.>H ELb�ONV�9►2 Nd- a^'
iTeL