Ordinance No. 05-12 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO.2005- _
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING 19.56 ACRES, APPROVING ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL/SUMMIT RIDGE ANNEXATION (ZCA2005-00003), AND WITHDRAWING
PROPERTY FROM THE TIGARD WATER DISTRICT,WASHINGTON COUNTY ENHANCED
SHERIFF'S PATROL DISTRICT, WASHINGTON COUNTY URBAN ROADS MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT, WASHINGTON COUNTY STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT #1, AND THE
WASHINGTON COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard is authorized by ORS 222.120(4)(B) and 222.170 to initiate an annexation
upon receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the teiritory proposed to be
annexed and written consent from owners of more than half the land in the territory proposed to be
armexed; and
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard is authorized by ORS 222.120(5) and 222.520 to withdraw properties
which currently lie within the boundary of the Tigard Water District, the Washington County Enhanced
Sheriffs Patrol District,Washington County Urban Roads Maintenance District, Washington County Street
Lighting District #1, and the Washington County Vector Control District upon completion of the
annexation; and
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on August 9, 2005 to consider the annexation
of 38 parcels and portions of 18 additional parcels of land consisting of a total of 19.56 acres and
withdrawal of said property from the Tigard Water District, the Washington County Enhanced Sheriffs
Patrol District,Washington County Urban Roads Maintenance District,Washington County Street Lighting
District#1, and the Washington County Vector Control District; and
WHEREAS, the City Council left the record open for written submissions for an additional seven days
after the Bearing on August 9, 2005 and allowed a further seven days on August 23, 2005 for submission of
responses to new evidence submitted during that tune, as provided by ORS 197.763(6)(c); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to ORS 222.520(2) the City is liable to the Water District for certain debt
obligations, however, in this instance the Water District has no debt for the City to assume, therefore, no
option regarding the assumption of debt needs to be made; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Metro 3..09, ORS 222.120 and 222.524, notice was given and the City held a
public hearing on the issue of the annexation into the City and withdrawal of the annexed property from the
Tigard Water District, the Washington County Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol District, Washington County
.Urban Roads Maintenance District, Washiington County Street Lighting District 91, annd the Washington
County Vector Control District; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to ORS 222:524, the City must declare the withdrawal of annexed properties from
the Tigard Water District, the Washnigtonn County Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol District, Washington County
Urban Roads Maintenance District, Washington County Street Lighting District #1, and the Washington
County Vector Control District by Ordinance; and
ORDINANCE NO.2005- ZCA2005-00003 Alberta.Rider/Sunwut Ridge Annexation
Pagel. of 3
WHEREAS,the Tigard Development Code states that upon annexation, the zone is automatically changed
to the City zoniamg most closely conforming to the County zoning; and
WHEREAS, the current zoning district is R-7, an existing City zone that has been adopted by the
County and the zoning after anmexation would remain R-7 so that no zone change is necessary, and by
annexation the Comprehensive Plata of time City of Tigard goes into effect; and
WHEREAS,the annexation has been processed in accordance with the requirements of Metro 3.09.and has
been reviewed for compliance with the Tigard Community Development Code and the Comprehensive
Plan and the aanmexationm substantially addresses the standards in Metro 3.09 regulating annexations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully considered the testimony at the public hearing and the written
materials submitted after the healing and determined that withdrawal of the annexed properties from the
applicable service districts is in the best interest of the City of Tigard.
NOW, THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The Council adopts the staff report and the document entitled "Supplemental Finding
Concerning Compliance with ORS Chapter 222" as findings. In addition, Council adopts
the document entitled"Findings in Response to Comments"as additional findings of fact.
SECTION 2: The Tigard City Council hereby annexes the parcels described in the attached REVISED
Exhibit "A" and shown inn REVISED Exhibit "B" and withdraws said parcels fiom the
Tigard Water District, the Washh-igton County Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol District,
Washington County Urban Roads Maintenance District,Washington County Street Lighting
District#1, and the Washington County Vector Control District.
SECTION 3: This ordirmance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the .
Mayor and posting by the City Recorder.
SECTION 4: City staff is directed to take all necessary measures to implement the annexation, including
filing certified copies of the Ordinance with Metro for ad-ministrative processing, filing with
state and county agencies as required by law, and providing notice to utilities.
SECTION 5: Pursuant to ORS 222.120(5), the effective date of the withdrawal of the property from the
Washington County Enhanced Sheriff s Patrol District, Washington County Urban Roads
Maintenance District, Washington County Street Lighting Distiict #1, and the Washington
County Vector Control District shall be the effective date of this annexation.
SECTION 6: Pursuant to ORS 222.465, the effective date of the withdrawal of this property from the
Tigard Water District shall be July 1,2006.
SECTION 7: hi accordance with ORS 222.180, the annexation shall be effective upon filing with the
Secretary of State.
ORDINANCE NO.2005- ZCA2005-00003 Alberta Rider/Smninit Ridge Annexation
Page 2 of 3
PASSED: By 017fth?0113 vote of all Council members present after being read by number and
title only,this I.3 l` day of 2005.
'�.e Gc�
Cathy Wheatley, City Re order
APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of 2005.
c
U�e -
Craig irksen,Mayor
Approved as to form:
V 1
Attorney
Date
ORDINANCE NO.2005- ZCA2005-00003 Alberta Rider/Summit Ridge Annexation
Page 3 of 3
r
EXHIBIT A :
ZCA2.005-00003 (Excluding Ms. Alberta Rider's Life Tenancy Area)
ALBERTA RIDERISUMMIT RIDGE SUBDIVISION
A txact of land situated in the Section 9, Township 2 South Range 1 West Willamette
Meridian described as follows:
Commencing at a point nort-hwest comer of the subdivision plat of Arlington Heights;
thence N 01° 57' 48" E a distance of 13.03 feet; thence S 88° 04' 30"W a distance of
625.20 feet to The True point of Beginning of the Annexation being on the southerly
right-of-way of SW Bull Mountain Road; thence S 01° 56'56"W a distance of 426.22
feet; thence S 88' 56' 17"E a distance of 212.83 feet; thence S 02° 00' 00"W a
distance of 274.61 feet; thence N 88° 49' 24"W a distance of 336.20 feet; thence S 01'
15' 49"W a distance of 475.68 feet; thence S 87° 59' 46"E a distance.of 303.50 feet;
thence S 01' 15' 46"W a distance of 561.57 feet; thence N 87° 59' 46"W a distance of
303.50 feet; thence N 01' 15' 46"E a distance of 561.57; thence N 87° 59' 46"W a
distance of 846 feet to the easterly right-of-way of SW 133rd Ave; thence NO 1° 33' 29"
E, along said right-of-way, a distance of 50.00 feet; thence S 87° 59' 46"E a distance of
221.31 feet; thence N 01° 21' 36"E a distance of 140.04 feet; thence S 87° 58' 20"E a
distance of 220.90 feet; thence N 01° 15' 49"E a distance of 1185.00 feet to the
southerly night-of-way of SW Bull Mountain Road; thence S 59° 18' 32"E, along said
right-of-way, a distance of 43 3.01 feet; thence N 88° 04' 30"E, along said right-of-way,
a distance of 158.32 feet to the point of beginning.
Excepting
Commencing at a point northwest conger of the subdivision plat of Arlington Heights; .
thence N 01° 57' 48"E a distance of 13.03 feet;. thence S. 88° 04' 30"W, along said:.
southerly night-of-way a distance of 737.52 feet to The True point of Beginning of the
exception being on the southerly right of way of SW Bull Mouuntain Road; thence S 88°
04' 30"W, along said southerly right of way, a distance of 46.00 feet to and angle point
in said southerly right of way; thence N 59° 18' 32"W, along said southerly right-of-
way, a distance of 231 feet; thence leaving said southerly right-of-way, S 05° 34' 56"
W a distance of 277 feet; thence N 85° 46' 31"E a distance of 277 feet; thence N 01'
55' 30"W a distance of 139 feet to the point of beginning.
kXengyohnrhWnW 2s10Bac&ad 21o01300.doc
2S 1 O9AC 2S 1 O9AC
9♦'j �•"• - 'y�\ mw•m.m, r„MriXX,k,i:MW, '.7:' '' aR 1A'..,.',:'Q.'.±�'., r.l -{. �I ��'' .'l ,y-r 71Ag:
:sll �'' •!
(_� 'wC4GtrL. .-�_r•._o'r sI4a-'r_�r^.w„rrI._:lq all•=`I\selll`i`.i^'xI'.4,�3g-.%1/;1♦r1•rt1%r{!r3r q.nx�r1lhxlr,WI•45r1;1c.11..,rrz'•g•'�i,ji;�l a1",.r'A:.�'':y"yr�,i.�9 fwfl..'',• ''.'•nw,m.lrrw''u'" •'s••�''�+!GIr I''�l-:'ri•,:•'f''�y..'�r'•;;''••'''_�,"-�.!,,••rgi•--p'u-'y',�-•'•.'•�}1r1rI�'.,t`'�I�''",C ',I{{I-f(.'�`''iB.sLrix.''..''L'::I.�p•'.,.o,n''a'.r�1.''L•ia'lY e.Qg�F•',.£ki1:t.` ,�,."" r 4.pt.+ I 1•' °� .kgR,•n,,M,".�aL�.ma_•ln3'I3L0�.tu'.'xb."••+..•a,-a.:�••...,'$R&'G1!�I f �Zl3J �I�FVg1-','�r:�•':�:',.��•r'�m.��ru'0.
ITa>7.vu6ww`7_1
_•
, :4r}a0Z1W�o ' xa"m . o.
fp BA [ .. r(^i;w$•.:-'kI',•y,^ilr�7•e
3tirI4r.
m'
r�+S
'}l
'.'�:y . 'IIII IL IQ.}} Aa00 '� �'a.•S',, Q�•'-�--^ rl
, ,'NI AC' Q'..l , � 1^ "?��.nwlo..'�'�•S IY'.:. t'Xtld•.{F.'iN1N",I'.:'IuH.'i'A 1
WJ
V -Sx 1 \ x�4F I'a ` .a0 '.'. <'1.s44r,.• !! •'tir•R, 3NlIC ( •ro•. �.I'N'x. 11. t�`rlhW,
rwt'"rhVgl I x .'�:' •�w. rr ) � ?�.., 14`'..•Jo. S
.. g3 "\ (r<. •'r," .!•`�;� ! JJJ111 � '7 ,_••;.1�,.LL' r ',�:;:+:— �`�11,•'• ,�_:�' t1
''i's \C"+x �* '.f' � .f rr k •I••+ ..� ,� ,,• L ,. ';,noun "�' .�',o„ •.Ls}w ra"r r3,w'.x I°,l+ i
.�, \♦ r ''•,, { ' ' ,'lydi►c.'' yy}:..rc.mail•' +
,
.RH:.
� � � � II`t. '•�,••�•._' �',•I. � �..---.�- s,�u _-..,._ ,r,..e x11 q;•�•,;-.�- �t37w
• . � � W�ra\�• '.•1 111 '.�•;'. 't,'•'.','.; •`.r tnara� t��'•. 17 .. �:..
A�10
� F''-.,.is Lti•wl .,�T'•i:low�:{
ta: I taf f " mr` gql �. : _� F,r �`'y`, .. ?` •r,: V4iASHpVGTaN CoilNTY aRECtaN
rl aPru II �'' k L] f• ,a<''
O °iI ,, '•Y I �y "`"�"�'�"`�^1"^1in""ii�x"^''�^�'�r^ f" !`; I: SW114NE1145ECTION09T2SR1WW.M.
ay y • " 4, ' :r sCAiE t•-1100•
�: ,,�:i.l,;..�;r', '•'.;•� I •,ti�„3w.�:,.j � �;'-r,»a�•;.;ri:
Jp - L;,H' rr '`i �R.- ;Sq,; Y:.9�,..3. :9��'•.3,;'`3e':a�<
In,54((91A05V va•a — ar -- eia .,� ry , s .jq`;{i.:., ,;a4� w - N x.°�"`� , y,, 77, 'Z \ as (, z°�o .i; ., ts'`yF«' 8 i5W S' - i.' .( seAe 8i:3'mPI .� q. ` S�a 4 �."° $ aPK ? ,e°o �� ) R ;r' vT fnY '="�`'•— :.a; ` -';i::;rti toleo4 " 5-
.m
� I �...� x•�.00 — � „x11' . Z
. * 23-74
' :'.�f� a f:-•”'- Y� 38^�3� .3�:`s
:.' y' 1 o0o C'Q�M/(op"4 ''"•.,o,,ir 'r'v'+ -,,mim.? :,)`"; ;,, s,=...- .F,:y',;v.
v>t M � .ri�• Io•i4rCr- �'� j'_ � r�'/ , !eM /.. ,�- •, ,,� • :. :,�`.;. .,�J:', .f.'i 1.- . '.
y 67 y II wonaa w rM 4h r' �*/`3;m'°'" ¢ r oµ8 S poAAp017joMAL MAPS Vr57r OUA WESSITEA7
d /•'--^'3u — •� ,,,•—„}?L14- �41Y �IN ''.' 9° 1C 79:• �. - Bf
°� x'Lrxcco.,varhfn on.aaur
.•' �$ j'�C.41�xl&rrn,t '- :J '•...�a.��h�..7.w i•zc: .°; ?.
s '
1•f1
,7ru :e1) �S "M��2 yti:ti».�"a, 130
L 'Q~�'YT�'''k Y� ••,�, -may. TIg7 nrr aykq�,,t��.,. x•,,i �a�:xr«:ern�•1«»x„• �.'.•, �`{+��",.^:;.^
elr. T2 7-v Ar
Oct
V.
� U C' ;�x_,p q:: .:�„�. easxcoaw-��_� taxa ..-. -ao ”•om �'` '.y.•^..
°--- .. _fl': Y r--.� 1._ Ali•
i,Q ...
-Il[�" A1IK K •I r_' I� .67K =ay (L •••tet •.;<_•''�•l•'•'D
'• Iwo '��r `i ••. f m,'�...1.�+.. �Y�um���r.•,�..,__._ r�� _ .r:� n.4'. ',:q 60. p� pQ�'•
•,a9 .� 5 ..-�."�.';r',' I r- •Iwo•r. .. .:
wacLoeL � � i�• .iia(.c r :• .1'
,.xPK _ g..
gyp° •}4 tiT,
3-78 ^r... xwo ,:;.• _ I +
�; 8 T tiriNP' G�YY n Xir d r n/
9ca
d WAG a_ ..I':''• G1P�fP.na �`wnuAiuL. M 1►x
'5w FiHOT
: t3�AW�i C*lGci 1 nW1 WG�rs
.r�.�.. r'^- p 1FI
?•a'r.ri7 ..•�� '''.9� ""^4`�y.•ax'•"•`a.,�:.spatir•:,�„r.'0lr.�i2.M, ,;qw:::.+':+r++. ware `�I x:::'we� �.'• •:•': .'.' j' '• '••'��r 4 L-
•.,(_ra.o � F �� 8P0 •# ^••••• —ani.Y--� 11•aiT � 3' l.rfVSfVVlW,1,
r4 1 4 a�ac �-
MAC
1, , '/•X,
Y��S �• sa.: craaLa> 1200
' 1 ° ePfc a °ac I' o as ® 3? L1 y � 1n
PLOT RATE.November 30,2004
'`'^$i.l. 1'• .•... .. .. } — r.r.r.uaoi '•;. .'�`.••:._. 'x•',
FOR QNLYEf�$ NFOT FFLYPONS
Q
FPA OTHER USE
Hdkala Lr,ma,l
' : jg' J A •;�•�"• �Ia I - n �•, MrA wrr deYnnl.dYyaRh.rp•+Y•hrmxr uscor.,,akh.e
'' .,, + «,�•”• .: ° tl � .E Liao - •'E oxiuiPcrnrw.th.moal.w nc,.w<n,ruwr.
r .r.eo�wiearlao�w.�.rWrNorgwaPr.l.rnop
"Jia,aori. r;'i•� .�.. Garr �•;r- .h.x io
P ;�• .'�: �, ,' .,I•.. '�,' ..•}•' `CIGAR
•'L'• . .. ..
2S 1O9AC
2S 1 09AD 25 1.09M)
m ^ '• •ar..r;.::i' '•',;'''tr 'y',;8 ,�„hs!+''..•` s �'ru'4r'r'a� r •1,:•fl� ',1 ;,• �.� a :r,rj,' ':c r' ''},;,• t,:.s:: A1,vi:•. :r
aJ• �d .R Y' 3 •'Y'''r'• 's: '.r ri i. •'r'`li" ''r,l :; ''r{f4.
1JJ ¢ ',,'J '•rrr' •r•
�''
LX x
% ,loR r "r•J'' 'i1 -'1'' 'd dAr't' '+'' `: 1
�� '':%,.'',•;' ';1' '•,'.;l',`✓' 'I'''P,♦rIl•i°l]V,r.':�• 5",'1,•P.•:� 1O!s.4'�1 '';1',.i\ rYci•tTG"+1.'Y•- '. J11 1':V• ir'.ti _h'."^,''iIati 1o'd:'f';•_'—' ',.�'1-.a.....-::--it'...'.�i,).f',.1.''V r:♦y,' •Y...,:,l:' �r;'_
" sY}}1.'':i't+ii��,�,'a}i:•,•
j
� '4' ,':f''•:i 1:'''1''':1''':1''':t'•'r',y.' •!. Y.• 'rI•%. ••' ,:•.1.• ;•�� ..
�"•� ';r� r',;',r' :,r, 5 ,e �:, i' .r '' '•' ' ,A' 'r''',r '1:'' 1 ' 'sr,,.:r •.'1 1
utr71 LqF#• '1''Y' '"' :i' ;hy '1:','tett;, :+';:i; -t � . .IV;. •:C .y'"r ps;,�1::•.:+
arYr,r `,i '•i ;}' - :.'`�.. Q +si'y,�':J ,�.:r,'.�i..,_srJ'' --4�r^•,=. 1" '•:• ',• `,'''':[''.' •:i •)t ., r ';",�J�',q,'1'lF.r.,f.sYj}�.; 'r,
• ;iy�;. >I', ern t 1', `s ',7',�p'w�,.: -"•;s�,-���;'s:-'�-_.+ 4.
!,".;.
I : ,s�;,r •;�;,, .1,.!
y�,,// t5 :`•'3"., '• '_ := 'u.� .. •n04 uo4 0 dlooi 's. ,:, t:,;,17 J41( ,, ,,. s,,,rt; ?rr.,^;r;
14 ,�
w `••'' •.i' 9 R Jar d 4 � � 74 '�\tiwrlvto-n+irHst '"'v •i'••• : yt" ,�. . ,i i''�,, i-.`,1 ,,,�y �y�,wy,4,tis,hw:w'vJyJ1,Ss' •.q+aj7t3nt'' '+ '' ,1'x c.'r '' ••rN!�1'°':"r{H�,•w j,fpjr••q�yFi s
�.•'�'.r'`-`'afi::, :R -.'`I r' X600 11DP}'�( Sli.".., rJ�i Yq.r.aw ' r�147{ :. A s:'r a.,e�p1lY �+ 1•'%' :i'S'•t. !'r•'y5 :'•..1 k, .1
100 'i;'` :�'r�'•,! '*d{ Y`,t ira�.,' ,,:. ,r 1, .S ,,. .1�,•,
•. r 1 1 1 1 7daa 'r 1'::`:1,• fir' i"
I 1 I' ..,.;Sw. a.. [ 800 t 1 s. %r.': .,, _ :Ifa',•ilrMss�,;15:q`. i,:ldK;'ilrif.s::�I,,f.I,
f i 1, f d
!�',-L :'^^;`••'�• 1000 ,i^ ° 1304 6q he v 1 ; .1'sf:` ,`' r �r'a�'✓'r rt r'',r'..}.!ts.i:�''''•1 r'+<T 4.1_1L
m
77,
coca Ito
1 a �^ 7 344 1' 7a
W, %'' W.
''ZJL�r�J'-.. '','',,ri'yri;•i:H`.lh:�•:J''�'Y`�•irlti}'�`,'`^f Y%"3''1 r`','': { P" 31is� iA 1!fes+� � vl �*�6ti°tc •4i 1d0�0, 1�"r 1 "' •��- i`'.'' .yt:,y'•!h;;",; W."'•''1p}+;
404 'Y,�y•'�y',•;�`,ri'+�
:v •'
7109 7170 004 dr 4 8844 uAc
'' L', OREGON
w.
,
GONa •tr :t''t; 304 11a07L WASHINGTON COUNTY
" d
5E1MNA114SCCT1ONOET28R7WWX.•
5, a34a 11 u d r u \ mH .i t4'( [iR SCALE 1'a 100'
Q)B Y' y f 7°04
- M - ':;'':i' ••r ,':: n. Y r 'ri Lr 1+4 ^I 9004 1100/ i "M't 'h+w•V'y 700 .t';:•'7t•
p ,`'•, �• +. r, $ pFF i• /t0a a1 as1 200 LV ° •r 'k.1J r It/lis
d 'ir 5 i\RR e 31 4160 I7 A0 Y.
u7 ';: 71 5W$IR�SVIEW , �I}sa\}aw}„ y+5 ton \w++Ml Zr'' r'''
S wa .; ::',N;` s J'" rlt.-- 1 �"'. , -ifi7f•��i'usw Iq 1000 LL,
' '
Q 7''r , 'li••L''r,l; ••a g 3100 x a.110c r •//�7 P7
!tf Q ,i ';a:•r•y;i',�:•'.�`'r 7 ,tiN1 7,tr •� lir'/ °00 �i 101100E-M1 A�hC - •I;' ''s:si'�"L+'�
CIA. r.''•., ,l•,,.'a• .• k'IIIX • .J 7140 IA1ia o04 F :`;i'.'i'' .S \:,,,1, .V;`:a„r"•I:
� cl
ti �.''•i%}.',k,:" 9 t7 440p' - ^ I•`-4 }I 'Sf'. r 71; ''.9'"Y•'+••,1`'•r''')<
T]f" loco 11 (y
'23S 6 a A
,fin,•''::;;'” s f ;i'b. '}: ' 7doa 2000" w1 too
w,•• yye� ,r' 'r; ann> )a q 3 Oa1°0 •� t .,i' ,1' .{,'•, .ri Y
v� 'rl �t� �•�'i 'x''.: `r•- 7a09 { F 3 ,urc � "•h' i °
71 "Do 3700
"Iva.`wlrin,sY I +1
V � ;, �•, -I.' \ \H, \\\N\\`\\NUIYI, YCIIWitMRR SW fOAAbpRfONALMAP3-W-59 OUR WONSAEAT
•'1:";,:. r x 1,ie�'+�-#r - ' YYY" .\:� 1'�1/�iy''�G!' I , t ,nx ,. i , . NWrVrcp.waihln7ran.trY.Y1
�, �I,�K,w�,rr�f�,t„�I�Yr •):•":r, r;�:
• 7C : ;'a' ,N \itnR\a,µN'�L:1�:tt\\c.\N �• ,wnnnHl«+xxl 1 H IM IC'-sC '4 ':,�':r• ..
7100 a04 •a;;lr�.�'' lf''`) 'i �1,.J'w" t i r• r•":y X7:;7.
'•u' ii'':i�':i�;' , xn,.., „L« •+'r :i�:{��. .: .�H'.,• y 9r�;r ".�I149 1: ;y,�l
1404 1700 1200 5 1100 • d009'� 7 E s ,tF: Y. , y::li:':).•}i�/ScSji•:�1: r y;r 't::;
/•'.'S;•'s:'� ,,,• :, 7 � 1 � .1 � "'+''- •: r:''r,'};s:.''')f [•,•i�'s� ''''Ji;•y sj"�r.�'
!,:'•.`! ',h' a 1 ua .a +. Y uer ,,aw :i�'s� 1( ,r �}i•X htPls'�i`i't9` • s•SAGr'i� AD
I} V.
sw WiNTERVIEW DRIVE
•T•• `�'• �,"�r,";J �11VIi1; ,.,rl,yy�.S; �•y!'] ,J:�'nt', sky if•
YS r eq La Md �k I1.71 rA i r1, '. ;'rr,'1 ,'+'r`,s"`l''•ll S4["', •,r- ip..+`4 `''•` ,`):e'
•,I: ':S'• ','r'.'`' 1100 I 11°0 Id04 4704 4800 6100 7060 71 i 'Y''t{ ;•r:'•;'1aui:'.�r:• •r,� '• t.� i•r ,'1 ,r ,
', ^',: ^.r• ;✓•' L,iY g ° I' 07 3 :r; :'".,)g7. �;:. it''S�i'`''a'l'b .'iX,,rt. :r'7.:'„ra Lr�•. t�.''ii,�
f��,'1:'h'r r • Y r) I j11 t% 1 iy'/!�'' 't:' %e''7"';'`,',,,;I`,;'•' - i�' Y•�7�%i`iH;e.`�S,r''r'•it�,'I •r
a :. 'r:•,,.�' '',i +: 1• Jl -1 J 1
J,lrrrir,f'` 1)'`:i•ii- inn r 1 ar wn wl ,,•' ,'�r' '.• 1•
'';.•;,.;,'taiA1.:.:i;1:•'i''')t' 1300 8700 1 p0 1190 5 ,°840 A n r:i• !er•u ' , ,NrHi .•''ti•1 1:, Cmo�xo�,d�,1b FanA710109AD '
;r'' '23-78 ti 14. 17 K lJ.J 74 y 'ww*r' r •'• e601 o6P1.im1,110°rilpi
s; sf 's• )c'4A mrx I i 7) ' ' ? 7x00h'r �'� :a ;:!.r•.;`;:,;. IOhimi�i'100. - .
`a ' ' II LC- RR w 3e 7�'':' :, .',-;r, .. •i:
':ti•••y', - �.' °040 ❑ tl 171]0 ••, .yi 'i:'�1e',':l .,, ):;•;1•f
'•,' - 13 °
Y e.",-�t;. .:.'ri, 1300 SAUyy�S'1'fV. I,..,a i7
Goo(,
70° .,. y,:•,,:+,, ; .
;. "eX.,':1" . %a COUMFRY ' 1 >f
r`•:'r.,I,r�.; •; 1;, ::
{l ,y , r +�)O J�f•V iw3s L' ;:,;il,'',r V.t`,
'' • 'r''
`•),'✓': '` Ixr•'unr I =""'Stir 1 q,r +, ..� , .1:• , .r.
17 H04 n.x• 1..--. .rr;`..' r�fAt.a},'';t'�•`r`•, -
jjq ;r
;,;',:'''rt 1: SS'''.( ' I I - � aIOP ,.�`(� 4� ry1 4 r/•' ,' ''i li'•'.t '' •k _ ,'y
Via11 ✓�a I�Yo r;.:' ".ti'-.y'x'':;':�:}{�;, ;r;••f st :;
N.
:!.•i'u'• '. 1 - I 70 tZ,Q` It6a i•;•� :;,:{" •i` "'r:�'is'n TS ®7 9 6 e� Pl
: r•_ ;i'':!' I ! u �.�'Pc a (� °ia }° I; :i y'•: til,;:u7•'r'�,rr:':r;: PLOT DATE;July 09,2002
, ,t :r;•';r;`;,,:f; :;',r' `stp(J ASS"SSM 7PU CC POo
SES
'1;''r: �•`,. :i_':•:'i`I•' I OJ'Y'+ +s• °710 n .•.r''1'. LR3 }!'`'1�lrrrb,; •.'i'•'ti • '', 'Si'''ll •s( �QQlT A � pN
:s1: '•)1, .: Y '8160 ,i' " " ' "' •':;'+`J:,,iS f"Of�411'7CR ClS
" a4oa ' ti4�d" .'';
24 SCC •': ,r,,.r. ',. "rf-`r: M.P!!. saw.l.earlalYr rx.ec•v.Qonareh.r
as rs ',t,i V•r ,r�l..',S''.K'r' :+; :•:: �:' prYrm to�s�arlVw�n.�WfFir�i wn,drM wHirav{�m�r0
1100 "t,�`i,' q ,i i r•r• (xf;„nnlrn'«�r':'rq'Ip;In,i'i• , 1 w,++nfP^r>•M
,, xr 'H.•::r�1i'•;J•• ••r(:•s:":r,'' ''ic ir'':i'sr' .±" ;rl 1� 31 V .�°�'1c'` ,.iwloae' .:+:,, hv°e mwranwnrHtamltlwa -
�.� '1'r ;t'- },; ',( ';, :I;", 4100 '8 ., P.(y; 'c' ,3)s: ii'�'y)r ra•..'• 7 -
':r"N;' �,'' '',''' ,,•'`` t: q 1 '•+K'a, f� ',1 r s:.'' W.
:raw :1 y�-'•�rri
'r' ,'
;1. ..f: ;i4•�i ;t.1„. :,i, 1 l \.;L"•}ri i1 y '',;'`11110111.°'t'i•.• `:1
';J'' ''>.:r rr!' ':ti :1,' �''�,��: 17ryr" Nq •4a34C
r'' '�' sI 7Y,. „ p
y' �r' a" 71GAR
arc,' ''.+•'is' '.IF s ��•..''�,.•'��Sr".x,Y4 '1 .�. '�'�Sr: �t,,:.', n o A nn n r•\
2S1 0 2S 1.09D8
{'C ', .4 1. t. +, +., i+•'� r1 r'+
COj, ''d �';i r •:J. '.-,;:.-. `.,.,tet: ':+' ,'L!'`i'`,• ';i r ��� :1"'II; ,�[�, Yy�'•',r:3t'.!C'',I'� L• ori`, >'' �1;1 •J' '`.i ,1,:4•. 'iN' r'`k
r1 '` . 'if,'t,' 'I:r''i�'i S,• li` ''1'"',i. ."^.R�., i.r ''1 JTM� `e•'�'LI���t� s7 '1:' ."r.• s•�.,•e: I':is
f ".: �r1ill:' _� L+ .r /'•,1 : �:'r'[`a: `!J'" •''!t'i ,II"il'A 1`1�,j1 .W L� 5' •4 Y '%+ `:<•:k ri '"'.t' :r' ':1'' .� J.I r ,,J•'' .1, 1H'rc-
•,(F0, •1' '1S '•s,,•};y '1'' 4 'L; r;I,`, r'�{rt, ,+,^.•r°'T,.'
F17tr � riolio, '-,7d[Ji, . .., , • ; , ,,, 1, ,'t'` ;d^ 'f' -'t'• ,K [.
�o° rli •:er'!t 1. J. .R" ;t":1 :1. :f 'a 'j;''i; 'r'r•,,'I r.S;1r' ,11„+;. ,;I'" .xL. •,,,•° '+ t
� O `err, ''• 1 •• �' 'Ji :r' 'C yi '+: ;+- a' �` 'tin' +14 .L .�,t .e,, '?:.. „` ,r 't''rlL�+• , •:,�� .
+7�'' ,L 1 .t• ,;I; r; 'i: ;.� ,. ,• .��'; .,4%' 'S: L Mf, r, .1:,r'ai'i 1.r.
�� •63, �. J, {I,, :t.'.L,a.il� !L, �: 'L;'li;' 'LI i:' `:+' 'r.'`r :i :t ;L; :1'` ,r(, :,t' L .'•lAvW:. .I
rLr1 •:i :I�r�+ `�1.� �r t l ,:�r`:+, :•� ++ ,�•"uritg''`' r't! "P 'r' ,4' r;1 Y ''1:' .'er^3'•�r c. +'i;'1•� JrJJ,,,,
5� :i'N' '%,:y" ':+ 1? a 4144'' ��� ,15,1` `y' p '•� ..L.- ,.j"5.� ,t:Ji.
:'�'� .t� '•yr •d''':r'`''L`^'Y 't',` r,l{ 4:14''1'"4' 14rt,'F•' `k'�'a'r: "' ',1,,' 'Sf r. 1' J' '
C! ''SI 1r, ' J. ^.�' 1, `i: '+'r� it�L'>�•r{•' e r '•`''T`',rrt
�'�f' `,l •"I., 'x •,. .r.'•fit•'' •ir'`J C'I�L• ')l'':i" ':r LJ'., .L '7414 ,i f' ':tl 'i:l.
IiM� •W .h'• r� ,'I', ,'1 r'L `:fi, ,L i,'S',r f,rC''• ' if. :.`l. rJ:l:i:,
'L! .�L." `Y'r�r•`%r�• t } t� it�k'�;'I•"": �,J.tys
u lts 7igti: -+•�:��:,.,11 •idl,u• )r f: i' :i'1['``Y, 5,'L'L: 1�'A.r` :L, I', ;I ,iL+lll' •.I,hlr::yMN'..ti:
^1^1--�Yrr+`«r+...-- ...�• `` �`� ''T• tt'''p '' `ii P• InP1 'ia .'R00.. tL•: •Jy Ni
W .� ,--,,..'.u. `-:z,.•s.r: rLr-$i._•: ..1..L'_..'.-..•_''..'[..�'F' e 7 Ix / �t +, E6 ':;•xiLsr':[' 9•:a;lti, sJ�: '''e•''',.+w"rr„'.i'� "!i�'�'ii)c
• •'• - 7000 a la .�rLyM1n.pJL., 4 i';ts� •;�1FIC',ir�ll��:rliN.:4iryip;='•
,'tr".� � Tao 1 41 S i19 a eu 6• 77 J•'ii�r�':,• 11 :r:': .�"•' ;r;.'L;r
'11'.+, .'r�lrt,{�': 6 h - 100" 3744
171 ac r. Y' :+ 'i` �.+,sA' ,:��t;lf 7• �^I �:t:t •-
t4 11] u� 110 an a xea 4 iii° j';WjL}
11 /� i 7 l 1 r inoWy'g :
.e'.
, etlw
..r�a4'`,r:�, 4:1i:•.,, �7, ' ,J nl/ u 0 54 p�.k 61�•;LL' i, ``ii6 Y ••n
+i• a ;'ws ad I1,:•ttt`,-'r-^ •��'- --•J' "�•..�..� L],J .110.Gu •L� :.lL}.F�fll •, :J'';-,i '-
:f L:; LLI E',':� ;1:";.; S - ZE EST k •' ,fir;,'
r',. �'. :,� WASHINGTDN COUNTY 0Fi8GON
• q+. �. r,,•�,�µ.'•• 6ga ] - NW1149E11439CTJ0N.09T2$R'1WW.M,
1.61 a INCALF;I*
4 0 4000 a alo
1L•~t _ , rrlci 11 J 5`:f,, 4il lrr i 'F �. .3 •' '
y, ..'= ,� ;• :,'ii^ 1000 ;.m�I"'.. ,. ++,+ 'rl'''•
v°° jj Jryy• ,
j ut � � " WAAA ..) pr,+{A, �. �,AI•rir'J� %•�
114 It WWI sW 5 SUMMIT
a0 ;i'• '1' 4 ,}• •• i`. .. t �- aww.� �5'Ge..w��_ __-hw'--_ + ,ti y. \?
`Ct •���; iWWJ�ra.•.+it,+ �Ij t �^'��
,ti,' 1�.;`'Jlef;. •t - til!}I l�a,M tilt'+ i�N:, '.•J, 3
+y..i a 'r'• ''r`,•'t' A4a Hao - - [.5;[, ra �:.,, i,^ ;F,•,: ; , ,., . .•, : ',,
,.
p., .,••;.•`• A tgoK' k i�°: k; t ^'r L,I t,:
C rr + •s•" F� fL^ I!•W ` :! FOA ADDITIONAL111APi V17R,4UA WE)IS71EAY
I�
G a+• •h,�+tf„'�Il• Cr7 ,Lr'. :r'� 'w FOA www.CoAV&ahlllPl9n.ohYi
O r�;�•'` CV ;' ;tw,1
f r,,k 1;Jt,•;Jit s;r;•j;s�.r'
23- ,J: `J' :'^:tib✓: t.,rt; •'.tr' `
A^� A 54;4 • a: .,r , r "•It :i:':'t ' ''t;.
O e1 YILI
I, pr�� 'r uaAc - - 7� �1ta, d nv- �� � •.'l{xt;';'!:1i;``''a.`'L,r';:�1'•_,;':;i1,y:x.+'~'r;�;!r.•r '`'j;rii`t•. "•,6.!$,r�y,;,[`.'.YsLii�`A��,t iL:[-.'tC�t.�P�'r
;,r;^,r^;• 4911; :.r,+b 'i,$,s��'P:c;,. .a,° 't i';r}i�,i• ' '
g�' _ ` CJS,�i(„Y, .`:,Vis•.. A IN
,J 'p' p�;IL_ •.r; 1 "` r '�.: ` '"`' `'t''':` F�+i r 'L` i
-� �•,•`� yp �+. 7740 1100 i'fl•`ii ti ?:+;; ��'
U IC, '.L,, LAA4 � 1tOtl 0.0 Ao LN 6 It: ,+, , /``., r• . y11`'r ti._ ti :^''i:
••44� Al 1. In A; l ',Y, tt;•;,i,,;i4��'ay _
•� , , `'•:'.� , - J 'SL Y L ^,L•t
` p
J:':tr, 71,,:tr Sao
WAi -
- ''F' 3�'I'."•Y,. `;l�4�. .. � ,J'• e, 5;' ,r,L r.�t'11:':1 '.t';Lt'1 w r t eo[1
'1 t� '. ?: .•:": '111AJ 'y(•`rq,`;'4' 'a ;i• •s; +('d 2609,
'•,j8R, {p
tato
:li"J•• 'n,r't.• S ' •'A�,`:i• ` ;tL.•',di jl''',Y^i:
' I,�Ic.e4, �+ .•t ",r,' -
1.I1 Aa . s: i l;a •,.
''S:'•fs." .•41•,•"y'�+ xuJr.aw Lliq SO IA+� -- .fw.�..,.•...�'t'.i4`�': s: 1:.•,:.,,•.5�.'r.• L,L':�;'
44:4`1+;r,,,,1 ,'yl�(�'4 _�L. :+'`' •�li;�;; 5r•':L;'.Y'•ii L' t�`•+ `K�j: a ';I�a�`r�'':•:5":P•' rile •`h'.,J:
'�,/tt,,�•°`F t+�''• '`St"ti?' `':<;�; 'r r~ ..r,'. 'a' i.L°+": m� ,{+;t'':d,',',t, °�i$19 8 T,M a Q'1 Q
;•[ 5;1: ',{"r•, 44;`14, .''`4 ��•' '• : ":t
:/' 'L. 1.I�.: r• ,•rt, •,,c :,SC,•; :., :+"'•: 1{ ,ti,r`I.,
• ,- "�,•'•.11' . �91•!i'' • "i{'` .. ^'ti t; 'i4,�ti, •,14i1 :i., E It ''ri''• ?:`' �`' 'I'' !: ;rS -.
•a.��•'a '•4::7�ir. j';='I:�,sJ �:{' •a•` 'Y,•'i4'':f,'li,` ':v14+',•• �.e',� a'h;,.`:h. ,,'''k•44�r':{':�:',JI 7 d g a
JpS`L •� s:r,l; of I;;r " ;i;''t ' 'ti ;L; u' ^°RLl '''V 5i ':i' ':Cr':y' :.,•. ;: PLOT I7ATFI January 13,2Oa5
,'''6 fA �; t •.' '1ral; y::a:;,;:,;: �.''' L{� FOAASSSSM M7 Ulf OSIS
',"j'i• `:�'i:r.a: •Y`:�^t:^Jt^;lr ,-ih^rt•L: -+a-•.�.1.- ,.i`�t'-.�+,t_'` .�.....�.w•`.. "+hl! ,, , '.••';i':1';• "'':'•'li s ONL Y•.Dp�fpT}�L QN
'..i xr, ✓: �, Lt' lf• lt' .w"H^} {p}v'w w : y7 5 i->L rt FOH ONT, U5�
F.�.r ,kq r •Y,' %h
:.19.1`. lt�5'•' ':t�• 'i.r'' " 4''71 Y'•.J:., 'Jt''.'I.r.'�.��Y ' :1 ,t, •sl`'' 1�" .rrlr tlrYnaq.dbY.M�KpIY.hgnOararJldlN''IC
ER
' Sr'� J"t sY„ 4i•Nil�i[ is{''':L'^'li 4 ':s" ♦'l:,r '`fi' ..r M°r, lrn uiam+Y+werra°n e.mdt
F •.r ;r•' ';i' ••S;' k .; ,J;? ,'ir: rh /, i,p,'r'. ,y, 1.po ;,.r\ :r"•'7ti„4. .,[ L. 1 annm r.Jer
'J{'`il ,k' ''It IS''•':I'.JI''' ,fl,`H;y ,I: 4 h, :r: 's: ,• ',4, ' ':�` n nw ud'ul wn°uSJta° rr°Jnrp
��y 'i�'+.' 'ti^ i{" i;r`I',�`a, S ,i 4• `"s'' ':['•,(1[',• �,k rr f'
GI'tf M tevnar+hr. PA'+Lo1
•:`Y.' J �y. .,,i�,i �,; +.1 '/'.4:5. ':4 A',' ,�7rW' t •`S(• tier ,5r'':i .L 1 '.'a'
:I Lr: I 'S( t: n ''i�• Lt�r.,r;, ^,tf 'r;�` `:t p,•yrnatewnAMArm Uo'I
�'bWIN :;r' ::+r'y'a, ii' fLl,.\' Sf ':(„ ':j,!;t, •, "'s'
''ti 4r'Y!4�':54 s,1�4,'1f`'Jt•' ,+r '.r,+.L�' `'M rh; 'y;'• �'sr'' :74
'i. �• "�r "`'y r',' v.
� • .,:''iJ +Y.� rCr•:L
s:''•L'' 'r;• +i s• ':r :t''`:f' `i.' '.t �'i4 ' �'y, "'r''';�t»
'•'\r I', •f'�,SI" 'rt :+1^
:t"•'`Iil `,,.1; ,,ry.,� . .� .�,, 'i'r'S: :i'•`'f'"'I'"7t'` •`,ti''L(41�J: 'ti`SI ,!4`:t,r 1.' J,
,,ii1• L,"' : +•. L „i/ �;M'r'I: v 411`:7'• r Lili�''JI, '.N'I;v'i 'H'rr •L( +:5: •lf�+.
't:r'tt' .r'•;lad, '' ':' „",li`: .J,�•�,;4.J,.:'i iftq i' .. .. ., i ., . .I. r4 ,. r�.:1. +. ,. . .. '
'r .'• (-.. .. . +'Jp' ,. „ .,;{. r �.r:wlr '':L: :J'L",+; r';+ .. .. .. sqC d AAI'tG• nD •t nnnla
2S 1 09DA 2S 1 09DA
'•a:' a +. .,�,,:,,,:,A:.,�.• .iti• ,,i+ ';l4i' a '( .�. •..�:.• '' ',.:.. '9r��r
5 +'
.-'. � ..•1•�. '•,may: -//-xx��.. '•i•
�1�yy•�a '•5' + ''sr''' :� i 'rw .7',$ ,:•c 1
'73' '�T•..
'f S 1WK'•"
•+1
1
..� ry• aq4:'fir 1 ..r .�` i.
,•J I.,r'4 n�''1Z•r37
N(tOPN
� '•'� e4 7A'i
7 0 dexo 1 a{
r� r5.• �T�•:u' "*^tea ,K 1F �t i w �. {q :r'••y'r�.a'' y ?7(` \.''•'•' r 9g0 �'t •ro.:w:'.•• e":•;,+:c i+':.
won 't'`a, sn• •'.^,'. '.� 5 ? t F. 't: •'�a'':1 °� 'r•'` 'ta!t+ly, ..
2urulpa s: :rarr'w;i ,30 N'.:ffi°3�- � e. l a71;•i'�1:`a' '•11+ teOG _ 66 '•P.'I •'s: •'"—':r`
17 :5: p,,• IIH�Tr
•.� . R7 ,� ee T7�Q s6400 Na0 g '1,�: :•t4: :'y:Xt \l. ^'-'Eti_, _ '''.••'�,. 1'I W' �'I 1W:.•'/A'LH'�:1 ''
u d. 9 e �'-1�' a , 1} 1 1 700 t ,' I'.nrbw 11• '•.`.'•, ::. 1': e: rilisi^•,
"•"'_' �: t;�`'�'r�.'
X.
.•lam-00� ' 6 r Ir`I�a.p 1 1940 b 'at 40Q ''';•, 1�40iA S' i'�4 ,'/`:'`:;• '`'''.� -
h t'1a�, 4 a3 f•�'ua
:.a to,• c:':9.111•. 'g3. •.dP;1.:.;;CC IrR.Ota
aA• xR I1fa4sa 15 {300 {•r'41 v,L9 .oxyd
670033 44 e311Q "1 1400 e7
44
REST
.HAZELCIru &00 omh.,!'yFt;`o4��A,.Q'r••'.:�;''••.:':,''•,'.:.i,r,:a;;,'•.•:.x,•;'•' :::'}jII,;r,�,'�'.'•:: �,::H;:H'',;->:'':.1tr':M>:•-W•',:��, r�ti•li�;t,w:�?4�+�•'s.l.',i.r;,,;P_+:j,r:.;e:.
.,;.,
':i)j•H:�:.ea,i
av / .;;r�._ 4•._a; _ ' w7' urw::
..!',•, :;raa,',:.csq I,w.t: .m nwt.w 67 .i 46
:I+ht�i :riinCia:�tilvwl� ,.,�crl'''+iq.' ♦
SA
s 1,•'�•1!"c"T'�_:i, 7',:.t•'k'i 7a•f.'. 'T �7'.w1_'.,-qH•„ 8�m ag ' m� r (W� '°'• I°° t5'�.N!1+t4t'ff�a" �Iyu,rt.67,ay -1«R 14,`` 5,x 16 ir1• 4i''�`t%/�+'[� �rl., 41
7400 610
76 .Ty 405070 / wa
'' '• :,%' J''':f,.rs:"ti,i''.''y�7'•:.?:.ti:;l»••.1
:
. WASHINGTON COUNTY
OUNTY
OREGON REGON
L,o t+iA a
+7 1FW NE114SE114 SECTION 06T2S R1WW.M.
LE
` -goo'u $ T14
Too I�a4 46 rtjTS4 xlaa1700ldoo4 42
•. �,. �a1,�c,Jf. .al'.:Y""a N..y$ j1; I
flan[•. 8104 7700 .6600 5 u R 37 R u MN ` F•MA51 + 9`,f•.! '^
''''•,.y'•, 78 ;t u', ,f 76 h1fHt;7.N:w w ! ?., •'�,;.;':',,•^•. ?�•,r;':� .PI'S.7'1
'•y! - tf� jslt YI m m 71 r1• ----11 1 Jr. _ 5.• 4ti; -R ;
SUMMITy 3 R1l7GE x t14oq
SW s STREET 71NGT• ., .•:':r
:/:. .c �.:�ti�,�� rr.0:- r .'+•-•'-ie :r+l ':r'''
Ci '. 'k ':::'•�' 66 o 6940 4740 e00 7,60 4.0 49'4'e33 h'a's »•�•�' t• i° , .�• f:A l �f1
It
_09
• (C 6100 '+''`',.`'�'}''r• '"' 'i•X .' ;00
JI
310iLjJ a 004 .: •,;:,.. :Jj:','', 3d� a' S d �' ��
p •, •'s;! 1 6700 g` •:•;' '�:<
Q :•.',':. IaaN �, t , ' • , " . • ••
ADITIONAL kAPS R WEBSlTE
II fORAOawwwo.Wsa IglQ0.61Oe3-78
. :11A , H ted0 9e7B0 '%,''•',', ,,,f.a 1 �0. ::.i;:�j1`::�','4�,'' r ::�•
�" Q -•,. - A -�,x„1.1 7t00 :,{•'' :,�I. r: 't'''! °i.'� '''' ,:.-
8000 x:ux ''''' '•'A�•'n - ir.•i a:;« 4�. %' ,.
� `-a,r''ro?+S••` .�!!* 7I 27 �'k}r's' '��` '::': .�:,'' ::9f"+.`^i;�`Bdi�•, .��r���aa:.r"'?A�t i•
:'•'•''s''.:":_• s'' 4400' •, ::5..
0009 ,:n. •k'; •�'hT+a•.•;�•¢ +'r' •;:'Y „ s:'.;i `' DA,
a �, '✓. ' 'r'!;i'.= ,'sS-•+;•s:
a''.1''':s'+.�•.• • ,yt7. v •.r .
,"" '•'' •' LL 66 i7o0 `'+a .rk;: �1:;:j1:' •,`.., 'r,:�^':;r
1,_•:,� •:',i•: :.`: .:5�: 3100 i 74 i `:ti" •�' ,'�'.; L. i s�sA;L`r`
'•r. iw. 1 n _LLJ
: ',• r'..rs• ' �:�, 7, ,tis.;Ii•'r',;:'+'t
`'.ti`: : ''L''• 3409 R 4604 +, ,, •• 'r .,t.',r.': '•:.
�,: :.r.• :,�:' a.u.an, u e 14 'n`' r° '';•':�'+;` Cart0odTMIOInfor,MORA
.05
' : :.;1 Lir •j''' '.ST.,1:r:'`••: ::�1:'•:..�'•4' 106,,1x,
'•'4'• l+' ,t 5;''` -uL 4111
_ s .r.' - F• i f.+,�
Sa3A i ll. .y ,r 7
010 :'� art-- L',71,_,r _4::.•'t,.,;Iria+'',:'.:;.+:'r' •',,
27001y, r' '..�'!.•` :a `,r
1a7K 7100 rrt' Y6Vr Polar H1 _ :'•:, :;_:- s,r; �1,�
� ,,laxer• .. ,••+,•
':s' SaoO '� 0700 R 4 '';+'• '7'*::' 'r;>•''' '`' dga S;$Cv x 5 m w n$
N u i baa a f9
yrs ,•r. �! "sr;l e- i.
—*--ry.q�o'-^" +,'', ,.r. i r•,' �"Y"z ., ''' ��,�✓I` fi"� 3t R� $ I 22 R$
.Il' ,."1.•` '• �....»..»._.��...-...-..�. •iW STnIRT 9 J^"t r-.;i.:+...r.t._t� ..•.. `+-. Tt.., r� t, .al��w:' �':r' r'ff*
"'`;r;,"tvt3 'i�:ieil'yti VIIW al0o 5. .w ,.•�:r, Sio,:=. `+.'• -� ,,-•• '' •>
•4'• `�if�,:'",:' S1• •'{•' ,•, M ''S;•,• 'Y' 1'1'••' '-Y' -�"'� 1'LOl'DATE:January 20,2005
Y`
4100 LIQ i',`'•r r` :, is '✓,i• u;':i"; . FORA SES M N PL11{ O ES
t+; sada +.•.�,: :?'• . }
':f'• M •y r'4••.lilt'+'.• allr4 hrrnlhQ6Y arhrrptry IheOi,a Er•p¢rlhildrrQ
(1�rId(10', p `7 •',: ••N' t paef' � a1En, '/.. •'�, MW
•'14' '•i:'• r� � ;i' ',1:' •'1; '�•:�•;�. •7P. � 1 ''1:'''a:' brn+lllml �'ld9q'AP:Md++nrMMa,!
:��`,. l.� •.W,ti`" :a.':` �,': i.+'' •;i ! .,ra Ay'Y' '�':"..'aaFc: � glr.mM Wy
•r'' ll•u•: 5 5'r1�1� ,r. •.+.•:,r.'^ "•s. •,�, V' �•::" amMPanrMDamda�Na:PMrtr anrpl ml ry5l'Oprlm mlp
4,'i,gilA. '• g �' .,+�. .'.i: 'S,p ':1' ':4' .IOe�'.',y1, .., :`.� ♦+e.
�':;'' ,:�. A fes. '•:'' 'Sr' 'Y' ''h'" ':1 aNK'.' •4:;'''•ir' CJ /„%',, [F rxn.n6nwr.mww+>.raan.
'1:Y
•r' •a
','4�:, .:•''� '71!5 .��1f
r'
u s-
r: �". 'f✓'' .',1•- Lai � ':'.'r'''1'
YM1. .. •.t
ha�•��nana 7.z'i•1 Clafln
CITY of TIGARG
► 'millNQ a
.,� I I III I
w �� • wig
JIM
I ON��,� '
Is
MON
NX
�
�N i
..i
Attaclument to Orduimice No. 2005-12
See Section 1 ATTACHMENT 6
Agenda Item: !
Hearing Date: August 9,2005 7:30 PM
e -
SECTION•I. APPL#CATION SUMMARY.
FILE NAME: ALBERTA RIDERISUMMIT RIDGE ANNEXATION
CASE NO.: Zone Change Annexation (ZCA)
ZGA2005-00003
OWNER(S): Various Owners
PROPOSAL: Annexation of 56 parceis containing approximatelyacres.into the
City cf Tigard. /I 6lcr 19,5/4
CURRENT'
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-7, Medium Density Residential.
-EQUIVALENT CITY
ZONING g
DESIGNATION: accommodate Medlattached Ssingle-family h mes Indetach6dr s nale fainly
homes with or without accessory residential,units,at a minimum o size
of 5,000 square feet, and duplexes, at-a minimum lot size. of 10,000
also erml
square feet.
SMobile
ebilcivIG anome d institutional institutional) uses n a e arepermittedpermitted
outnggh#.
conditionally. .
LOCATION: Alberta Rider School: WCTM 2S'109AC, Tax Lot 2100 and 2S.109AD,
arc of 1300; and Remainin Portions of Summit Rid e Subdivision:
5700 8$00 !1,1100 9500 9fi00
WCTM 2S109DA,Tax--lots 8 00 $600 10300= 11500, 1 fi00, 11700,
9700, 9800, g900,:10000,-10100:1020b_ .
1.4 800, 11900, 1 M.00, 12100, 12200, 9 2300, 12400, 12500, 12600,
. 12700, 12800, 12900, 1300O '13400 and 13500, and WGTM 2S 109DB,
Tax Lots 1000, 1900, 2100, 2200, 2300, 2400, 2500, 2600, 2700, 2800,
2900, 3000, 3100, 3200, 3300, 3400, 3500, 36.00, 3700, 3800, 3900
and 4000.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW p
Community Development Code Chapters- 18.320 and 18.390;
CRITERIA:
Comprehensive Plan.Policies 2 and 10; Metro Code Chapter 3.09; and
ORS Chapter 222.
SECTION Il. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
King
ter. . � e� �� �s��-1 _ ��` r � ��,� � •_5 ��; rn�ed � `P�t��E• �
PAGE 1 of 6
-A rC nconOT-rry•!•Ill-111 y c-Y)I INC:II
SECTION Ill. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Wicinitlnformlation: rd su JJect parte s are.located at the southeast isionwest of SW G ren a d,mer of SW 138 and �lnorth of SW Beef
and to the south in the Summit Ridge Su
Bend,Road.
Site Information and Pro osal Descri tion:,
ere.are
es
y ree areas invo ve in this particular 3 of Summit RidgeFe request:
the Iremaii ng
Rider School site; the undeveloped portion (Phase ) g
onions of Summit Ridge (Phase and 2) that were not previously approximately
annexed oHast year.
There are a total of' 56 properties involved in this request totaling pp Y
acres.
For the first area, the school site, as a condition of the Conditional Use approval, the
_
applicant was required school to the rotted err a timely fashion oro or to final n their const ucttionerrnit ns schedule
was.done to'allow the s p
while.going throegh the"process to annex. The intention is that the annexation will be
complete before til}e,school needs-to-open for if the annexation is not approved in time,
final inspections tale t be conducted and the school cannot be occupied.
The second area, Phase 3 of Summit Ridge, the subdivision was required to annex prior to
recording the final plat for the lots: This is a standard condition that is applied to properties
.requesting development approval-when bordering the city limits.
For the third area, Phases. 1 and 2 of Summit Ridge, portions of this subdivision are inside
and some are outside they city limits,
During�+he review iso of amQ a l gantPs:ri^ a consent
the prvpelr i jr d d not,abut the vi Y limits. The . ib v 4 1 vu sa. ,,iI av j.+ �� ya+ a �
form for fu ere annexation when-the subdivision s ontlmmed immediately north id abut the site. �Of Summit Ridan eeattlie
Jim s
Bearing to annex the Arbor Summit s
City included one of the pwaslfirsal' ed beforeSummithe platsfor those phases weretrecorded.
,
annexation occurred aril
The result was that,�me of boundaries. lots that the followincreated
rr ap through those plats ended up.
straddling the city lirni
.l
1 '
1t��
PAGE 2 of 6
c,TA=r»vnRT-TFl.THF CITY COUNCIL
SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS .
The relevant criteria rn #his case are'Tigard omprehensive Plan Policies 2.1_'I,.'i0. .'I,
-'10.7.2,and;Tigard Community Development Gode Chapter 78.324.
Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the.-relevant policies of the
Comprehensive Pian based on the following findings:
Com rehensive Plan
o icy e' _ity ,shall maintain an..ongoing citizen in�rolvement pro rare and..
shall assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to be involved in all phases
of the planning-process..
This -Policy requires .an ongoing citizen involvement program. Interested parses and
surrounding pproperty. Owners within 500 feet have been notified of the public hearing and
site has
nonce of the bearing has beenublished in a newse beenaanu er tier of opportunities fonc�iti ens to
been posted since June 23, �8�5- There have
be involved in the decision making process; including the review -of-the subdivision and
conditional use request
policy. '1p,1.7.: The Citi shall review,eaach' of the following services as-to adequate
capacity,.or such services to be made available,to serve the.parcel if developed to the .
most intense use allowed, and will not ..significan#1y reduce the leveldof servicesrc
available to developed and undeveloped land within the City-of Tig
are: wafer; sewer, drainage,streets, police, and fire protection.
This policy, requires adequate service capacity
delivery
el v ry tl�ali it-annexed
easparcels_
latin.Valley FiO
Tigard Police,.Engineerin0 and Water Depa _ objections- ,�
aliU i\e.�lJ1.iG, have�+ C,1lt re1l[e�fVGU LJtG annexation1G1.'I..�GsR and 1IQYG olIGIGU 41V oi.J}Gl+l.i111}.�. 711
the review of the Alberta Rider School and Summit Ridge subdivision, staff found .that the
adjacent streets had adequate:capacity with completion of required improvements, sewers
ad'
adjbe.extended up from Bella Vista subdivision on the south, through Summit Ridge and up
willthrouggh the Alberta Rider School site, storm drainage is conveeyed through � pews a line m
Bella Vista to.the Alberta Rider project, and water is-provided y . 9
Bein
l! Mountain Road. .The subdivision approval is contingent on the applicant providing these
Se
prior to recording the final plat. The conditional use.approval also required
completion of these utilities and facilities: This policy is satisfied.
. -lf required by an adopted capita[improvements.program ordinance,
the applicant shall
sigg n and record with'Washington Count} a-nonremonstrance a reement regarding the
followin The formation of a :local improvement district K.I.D. forextension of nthe
or
g services that be provided through such a district. he
follow ng
improvement of the following: water, sewer,drainage and streets. The forma#ion of a
special district for any of the above:services or the inclusion of the property into a
special service,district for any of the.above services.
No 1_1.D's have been required wittohb com le ct ed before erland use the and is spubdivded by ls. All-a final
infrastructure listed abovublic
e wtl! have p
subdivision plat or final inspection occurs on the school building. The costs of pro'vid;n such
home by
the applicant Since there are no capital improvements identified for
services will be
4his site, no nonremonstrance agreement is necessary.
The City shall provide urban services to-areas-within the Tigard urban planning area or
With the urban growth boundary upon annexation.
The Giiy of Tigard has an urban services agreement with Washington County for those areas "
within the Cit7�s urban growth boundary in the Bull Mountain area: This policy has been
complied with_
PAGE30F6
ions of
d.by the
be
ased
Policy 10.1:2: approval of proposed wirian the atnnexation eiiminate$Iari existingt"pocket"
findings with r=rpora
to the fol g
or "island" of li difficult for thepolice ein an emergenannOxation icy situation on to determulrie
:boundary that makesdepartment
whether the a aeon; the land shin or olo located witide the hin hepTiga d urban plann ns commented
and is
upon the annexation,.t
contiguous to the city, boundary;- the annexation can be accommo. ated by the
services listed in '10.1.1(a)_ proposed
This Policy pertains to bciundary criteiridan fof unincorporated a s. territor 13owever-thefann aion nnexation
oon
eliminate an existing pocket or:Isla ry .
will also not create anirregular ide the city. In fact, this annexafilon is ineparrtt determine,
address a
particular parcel is in o
situation where,parcels fall d b inside the pawl nclus on of thand outside the ese prflperties�cteir formabonr is
number of services Y The sub He
annexation will
the result of disjointed annexation and p�lat approval timing_ 1
oli
urinate this confusion and implement the original requirements ll au n rate he subdivision
b iisientire
e er
regardin� annexation of the proTer The proposed annexation incorporate
.subdivision boundary-for Phase of Summit Rdge s addition,
ft'BoUntdanes ire of this h request
Alberta Rider school site sits is also includedq
where the school abuts Bull
follow logical extensions to
ons annexatie of the on w tlrnclude thetremaininq porton of that road
Mountain Road. In that o
s wi
that is not presently in the cit 'Servicesbo bordered blatttend i c it limits on the noithernsidee-eetva es tv
urban Growth Boundary
the subject properly are addressed above. his policy is meta
.Communi Devela 1-- Gode
ec#ion rs ection addresses . approval standards for' annexation
proposa s:
All services and facilities are available to the area and'have sufficient capacity to
provide service for the proposed annexation area;
is
Adequate service (water, sewer, drainage, streets,
TiI and Policeand eEngineeririgpd Water.
available to serve the annexed parcels. The City g
Departments, Nw Natural Gas, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, Have.all reviewed the
and
annexation request and have of intended R 7 Medium Density res}ident l and institutional
availability of services to serve the
development-has been reviewed and conditioned as necessary as part of the Summit Ridge
subdivision and Alberta Rider reviews•.1herefore,this policy is sans ed.
The applicable comprehensive plan policies and implementing ordinance provisions
have been satisfied. implementing
Applicable Comprehensive Plan policies have 3beennaddressed etro Code 3.09. were fo!owed in
ordinance provisions of ORS
222, TCDG 1 - -
processing this annexatitlnefereviousiand use eviews Th s staridardphas been dme provisions
have been addressed in p
Assi nment of cam rehensi ne rehensive
les na on piaceng �on netpr pe The shall be the City's
:pan -esigna ion an a zon g g p
zoning district whichmost
cIOS;The 1 assignmenternets o ththe ese desig a ions-shall occur
Plan- map- design
automatically and concurrently with the annexation. In the case of land which carries
County designations,the City shall convert the County's comprehensive plan map and
zoning is required
designations to
cant eq ests a c mpehnations which ensive plan map nde the most ror zoning
. change is required i pp
map designation a change ca be tpro processed concurrently with tan annexation
request far a zone 9 .
application or after the annexation has been approved_
PAGE 4 OF 6
The subject properties are in the Urban Service Area and are zoned R 7 .medium density
residential, pursuant to the City' df Tigard's Urban Services Intergovernmental Agreement .
The R-7 zoning designs#ion is consistent with the original Washington County's R 6 zoning
-designation as shown in the table below. The City's zoning was adop#ed by. County whe
the City:s R-7 zoning district when the Intergovernmental Agreement was signed between the
county and the,city to provide city planning services to this area. Therefore, the'property
does not need to be rezoned 'upon_annexation. According to. Section 1$.320.020.C, the
Ci s Comprehensive plan and zoning'designations occur automatically and concurrently
,with the annexation.
Conversion table.. Table 320.1. summarizes the conversion of the County's plan and
zoning designa tons to City designations which are most similar.
fir:_., -
. - r-Ir a 1_A;=:-rt,_ y...-•.'+s-.. :i �li�'_..�_ -,-.,:lr' - - :'.0---� .-.i-.- - _ -:i]?== �y�_.• :=ti_
�'IM-:m,-i- --'-:_.]..,,.r:-r.':r.ys-:_,!v-;•.a ',.
c �w
2 W
ggg
_E 10-000
,.. Rmm
'F]Lt �r
•;-`x'�r -w- -
ME
Ti
gaq
apk`•r .---r -,,,,.-r-t.:..r...,was--, .. - - -
_
l
EE�L� iC��
•^.: t !'�` 1I3 '—' - ,.-� _F _-�-s-
I.- _ - :•.F.i-].a .kir- -Ci 1T 2 :fl3i .,..,., =_ ' � .-_r. z_--"'. _.r•�_ti.;.;•..
M
t:..t. .
T =' ='a'LTF43l�i �"""`" _ 7�ECS .._ ]7]6 ..._ �, 'anra-� , -�
,_: S
]
M ME
s ]
• ;...� 4�SU�
--
j'_r ?{31'-e:.x.—t--:-;a.:.r.... v,,.n:-]t ']----]-Y -nT.r-1:.._..lr-sM...-.-rte--"'].%•—T-i?r. ..................... .. .. .. ....+,w.-.r-r�:. .......
Metro
Metro 3.09 requires the.additional standards to be addressed in annexation decisions,
in addition to the locat and state review standards. These are addressed and satisfied
as discussed below:
Consistency with the directly!applicable provisions in an urban service provider
agreement or annexation plan adopted pursuant to ORS 195.065;
The processing has been done consistent with applicable' Urban: Service Provider
agreements.
Consistency with.directly applicable provisions of ut�ban planning air ogler agreement,
other than agreements adopted pursuant to QRS 195.065, between the affected entity
and a necessary par-y;
The process required by the
D v elapnex t Code and Comprehensive Plan is consistent with
the Urban Planning Ag e
PAGE 5 OF 6
TAFF RepnRT To THE Ci1Y COUNCIL
Consistency with specific directs applicable standards or criteria for boundary
changes contained in comprehensive land use pians and public facility.plans,
This has been discussed previously in this report and, as discussed,this criterion is satisfied.
consistency with specific directlyy applicable standards or criteria for boundary'
changes contained in the Regional Frarnework Plan or any functional plans;
-Because the Development Code has been amended to comply with. applicable Metro
functional plan requirements, by complyin with.the Development Code and Comprehensive
Pian, the annexation is consistent with the applicable Functional Plan and the Regional
Framework plan.
Whether theproposed changes will promote- or not interfere with the timely, orderly
and Economic provisions of public facdi#les and services;
The proposed annexation will not interfere with the provision of public.facilities or services -
be�ause it is adjacent to existing city limits and services, and the delivery of those services
was an0pated as part of the urban sere ces agreernen} u�fhich i� intended to pre!rote the
timely,orderly,and.economic delivery of those public facilities and services.
if the proposed boundary change is for annexation of territory to- Metro, a ,
determination by Metro Council that the territory should be included in the Urban
Growth Boundary shall be the primary criterion for approval;'
The subject property is already within the Metro boundaries.
-Consistency with other applicable criteria for the boundary change in question under
state and.local law.
Consistency with other applicable criteria has been discussed previously in this report.
SECTION V. AGENCY COMMENTS'
Washington County .Department Of Land Use & Transportation, Verizon, Qwest
-Communications, Northwest Natural Gas, -Beaverton School District #48, Comcast Gable
Corporation,.Portland General Electric, Metro Area Communications, Cleanwater Services,
Metro Land Use & Planning, Tualatin HillsPark &-Rec. District, Tualatin Valley Water
District, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, and TigardlTualatin School District 231 have had
the opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no objections.
Jul 28 2005
organ r cy
Associate Planner
y
SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS
CONCERNING COMPLIANCE WITH ORS CHAPTER 222
ZCA2005-00003—Alberta Rider/Summit Ridge
The City is proceeding with this annexation without an election in the territory to be .
annexed under ORS 222.125. That statute provides:
The legislative body of a city need not call or hold an election in the city
or in any contiguous territory proposed to be annexed or hold the
hearing otherwise required under ORS 222.120 when all of the owners
of land in that territory.and not less than 50 percent of the electors,if
any,residing in the territory consent in writing to the annexation of the
land in the territory and file a statement of their consent with"the
legislative body.- Upon receiving written consent to annexation by
owners and electors under this section,the legislative body of the city,
by resolution or ordinance,may set the final boundaries of the area to be
annexed by a legal description and proclaim the annexation.
The Council finds:
1. With the exception of one person who has a life estate in one portion of the area
originally proposed for annexation, all of the owners of land in the territory
proposed for annexation under ZCA2005-00003 have consented in writing to
annexation to the City of Tigard and those consents have been:duly filed with the
City.
2. According to County voter registration information,there is one registered voter
residing in the territory originally proposed to be annexed under ZCA2005-00003.
That elector is the same person who has a life estate in a property within the area
originally proposed for annexation. This elector has not signed a petition or
consent to annex. Therefore, the portion of the proposed annexation territory
where the elector resides and bas a life estate cannot be included in the proposed
annexation without an election.
3. The City Council determined to exclude the area where the elector/life estate
holder resides. The annexation of the remaining area-may proceed without a vote
in the territory to be annexed pursuant to ORS 222.125 because the City has the
consent of'all owners and there are no electors in the area now proposed for
annexation.'
Revised Findings as Submitted to the Tigard City
j Council from.the City Attorney on September 13, 2005
FINDINGS IN RESPONSE TU t;ulvu MIN 10
At the August 9, 2005,the City Council received testimony from various persons
regarding four proposed annexations. The Council allowed all parties until August 16 to submit
additional written information. This document sets out the City's findings on the legal and
factual issues raised by the testimony and written submissions. The Council received a request
to reopen the record to allow a response to the post-hearing written submissions and allowed
.until August 30 for persons to raise new issues relating to the new testimony, as provided by
ORS 197.763(6)(c) and 197.763(7). This document sets out the City's findings on the legal and
factual issues raised by the testimony and written submissions.
1. After the Council allowed additional time to raise new issues in response to new evidence
submitted in the post-hearing written submissions,the City received two submissions,
both e-mails sent by Julie Russell. Neither of those submissions raises new issues
because all issues presented in her e-mails had been raised previously. Furthermore,
neither of the submissions addresses new evidence submitted after the close of the oral
hearing,but simply contain further argument on the same factual and legal issues she and
other opponents had raised in her earlier submissions. Therefore,neither are proper
submissions under ORS 197.763(6)(c) and 197.763(7).
Issues Raised By More Than One Person
HB 2484
2. Some people testified that House Bill 2484 (which has been enacted into law) either
prevents the City from approving these annexations or demonstrates a legislative intent
that a vote is required in any area to be annexed. House Bill 2484 is straightforward. It
amends ORS 195.215,to make it clear that"annexation plans" under ORS Chapter 195
must be approved both by a majority of voters in the territory to be annexed and by a
majority within the City.
A. HB 2484 does not apply to the annexations being considered by the City because
HB 2484 applies only to annexation plans under ORS Chapter 195, and the
annexations before the City do not involve annexation plans or ORS Chapter 195.
They are annexations under ORS Chapter 222, in particular ORS 222.125. HB
2484, even if it were effective,would not apply to or affect these annexations.
B. HB 2484 requires a separate vote in the area to be annexed for annexation plan
annexations. However,requiring a vote in the area to be annexed would be a
meaningless and futile act for areas in which there are no registered voters. There
are no registered voters in the area to be annexed in Mountain View Estates
annexation (ZCA2004-00003) or in the Alberta Rider/Summit Ridge annexation
area(ZCA2005-00003). All of the registered voters in the Arlington Heights 3
(ZCA20005-00001) and Wilson Ridge (ZCA 2005.00002) annexation have
consented to annexation.
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS--ANNEXATIONS
Page 1
HB 2722
3. HB 2722 (which has been enacted into law)withdraws the right of cities to veto
formation of new cities within three miles of their borders. Some opponents of
annexation have argued that the intent of this bill is that the wishes of citizens in the
affected areas are respected.
A. HB 2722 does not apply to annexations.
B. The affected areas are the areas to be annexed. Two types of persons have
interests in the affected areas—those who own property and those who reside
there. All owners of all properties to be annexed, and all voters in areas to be
annexed have consented to the annexation. No owner or resident in the areas to
be annexed has indicated that they do not wish annexation.
SB 877
4. SB 877 (which has been enacted into law)has three major effects. One is that it limits
the ability of the City of Beaverton to annex"islands" of territory surrounded by that
City. The second effect is that it requires a majority vote in the territory to be annexed by
means of an annexation plan under ORS Chapter 195. The third effect is to prohibit the
annexation of certain types of industrial property without the consent of the owner.
A. The provisions affecting only the City of Beaverton do not apply to the City of
Tigard.
B. None of the proposed annexations are"island" annexations, although an"island"
is created by the Alberta Rider School/Summit Ridge annexation.
C. The annexations are not annexation plan annexations and are not subject to ORS
Chapter 195.
D. The annexations are not of industrial land and are not the type of land that cannot
be annexed without the consent of the owner. The City has the consent of all
owners of all land being annexed.
Voluntary or Coerced Consents
5. Some persons argued that the consents are not valid because they were coerced.
A. None of the people who provided consents stated they were coerced. Those who
testified that the consents were coerced did not specify which persons were
coerced. Several persons representing property owners (Tom Weber, John
Marquart, Sean Foushee, and Al Jeck) testified orally and/or in writing that
consents were voluntary and not coerced. The City Council finds that there is no
evidence that any specific individual was coerced into consenting to annexation.
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS--ANNEXATIONS
Page 2
If any person who provided consents believed that the consents were coerced, it is
likely that the person would have appeared at the hearing. The Council finds the
testimony of Tom Weber, John Marquart, Sean Foushee and Al Jeck to be more
persuasive than the evidence of those claiming coercion because the named
individuals were in a position to know whether the consents were voluntary or
coerced and those who claimed that the consents were coerced did not have
personal knowledge regarding the consents. The Council concludes that none of
the consents were coerced.
B. ORS 222.115 specifically authorizes contracts between a city and a landowner
relating to the extraterritorial provision of service in which the landowner
consents to annexation. The fact that the City requires a consent to annexation in
return for a contract for the extraterritorial provision of service is explicitly
authorized by statute and does not constitute coercion. The City provides
planning and building inspection services extraterritorially and may require
consents to annexation in order to provide those services.
C. ORS 222.175 recognizes that cities may solicit consents to annexation. The fact
that a City seeks consents does not mean that they were coerced and does not
invalidate the consents.
Consents To Annexation In Connection With A Land Use Proceeding
6. Some opponents argued that some of the consents were required in connection with land
use proceedings, and the City cannot require consents to annexation in order to process a
land use application or as a condition of a land use approval.
A. For consents that were provided in connection with a land use approval, the time
to challenge the City's authority to impose the consents was during the land use
process. In all but one of the cases, the land use process has been completed and
the appeal period has passed. The requirement to provide a consent to annexation
can no longer be challenged in those cases.
B. None of the persons who provided consents in connection with land use
proceedings have in any way challenged the consents or the requirement to
provide the consents. To the contrary, some of them have expressly testified that
they affirmatively desire that their properties be annexed to the City of Tigard.
The applicant for the one land use process that has not been completed(Arlington
Heights 3) has testified that the consent to annex that territory was voluntarily
provided, and the City Council finds that the consent in that case was voluntary.
General Concern For The Bull Mountain Area
7. Some opponents stated concerns related to the Bull Mountain area in general and to their
property in unincorporated areas of Bull Mountain. Some of them argued that the
proposed annexations should not proceed because of the negative vote when the Bull
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS--ANNEXATIONS
Page 3
Mountain Annexation Plan was presented to the voters in the area to be annexed.
A. The rights and interests of the owners and registered voters in the areas proposed
for annexation are recognized by statute. The statutes do not create a legally
protected interest for other persons.
B. These annexations are different from the annexation plan presented to the voters.
These annexations are property-specific annexations under ORS Chapter 222.
The City and the annexation applicants are not requesting approval of an
annexation plan. The rejection of an annexation plan under ORS Chapter 195
does not prevent later annexation of specific territory under a different annexation
statute.
"Double Ma ori "Vote
S. Some opponents of the annexation argued that a"double majority" vote (a separately
tabulated vote in the City and in the area to be annexed) is required.
A. A"double majority"vote is or will be required for annexation plans under ORS
Chapter 195. However, for annexations under ORS Chapter 222, votes in the City
are not required unless required by City charter or ordinance, and votes in the area
to be annexed are not required if certain criteria are met. A vote in the area to be
annexed is not required if all of the owners of all of the land and a majority of the
electors in the area to be annexed, if any, consent to the annexation. ORS
222.125. The City Charter and Code do not require a vote within the City.
B. As to each of the annexations,the City has received the consents of all of the
owners'of all of the land. The City has also received the consents of all of the
registered voters in each area that has registered voters. These annexations are
not annexation plan annexations under ORS 195, so the double majority
requirement does not apply. The City is not required to hold a vote in any of the
territories to be annexed, either because there are no electors in the areas to be
annexed or because the City has the consent of a majority of the electors in those
areas.
"Islands" Of Unincorporated Areas Surrounded By The Ci
9. Some opponents argued that these annexations create islands of unincorporated areas
surrounded by the City. They also note that the City may later annex those islands
without consent of owners or electors.
A. There is no legal prohibition on the creation of islands. The City must consider
annexation applications that create islands under applicable standards. While the
Council must consider whether the borders created by an annexation are so
irregular as to potentially cause problems with the provision of police services,
CITY COUNCIL BINDINGS--ANNEXATIONS
Page 4
the police department accepts these boundaries as being acceptable and not
causing confusion for the provision of police services. The police department has
provided written statements that they can provide services. The Council finds that
the boundaries are not irregular to the extent they create confusion in the
provision of police services.
B. The City does have the authority to annex islands,but is aware that the statutory
authority to annex islands may be withdrawn, as it has been withdrawn from one
other city and from certain types of land. The possibility of a future annexation
proceeding is not an applicable standard or criterion in deciding whether to
approve these annexations.
Re alar Boundaries
10. Several persons commented that the annexations will not result in a regular boundary.
A. The applicable standard is Comprehensive Plan Policy 10.1.2, which provides:
Approval of proposed annexations of land by the City shall be based on findings
with respect to the following:
a. The annexation eliminate an existing"pocket" or"island of
unincorporated territory; or
b. The annexation will not create an irregular boundary that
makes it difficult for the police in an emergency situation to determine
whether the parcel is within or outside the City;
C. The police department has commented on the annexation;
d. The land is located within the Tigard Urban Planning Area
and is contiguous to the City boundary;
e. The annexation can be accommodated by the services listed
in 10.1.1(a).
B. Policy 10.1.2 is complied with if either(1) subsection a or(2) subsections b
through e are met. These annexations comply with subsections b through e. The
annexation boundary will not make it difficult for the police in emergency
situations to determine whether the parcel is within or without the City. The
police department has commented on the annexation and stated that it is capable
of providing service, All areas proposed for annexation are within the Tigard
Urban Planning Area and are contiguous to the City. The services listed in
10.1.1(a) (water, sewer, drainage, streets,police and fire protection) can be
provided to the areas to be annexed—the City and other responsible service
providers have capacity to provide service to the areas to be annexed. The
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS ANNEXATIONS
Page 5
s:
Council finds that the annexations provide for a reasonable extension of the City's
boundaries.
Individual Comments—Testimony at Hearin
Les and Ellen Godowski
11. The Godowskis argued that the annexations will also prevent certain areas from creating
their own cities or annexing to King City.
A. The City has no obligation to refrain from annexing territory based on the
possibility that some other city may be incorporated in the area at some point in
the future.
B. All applicable plans and intergovernmental agreements that address urbanization
or the provision of urban services designate Tigard as the City that will annex
and/or provide urban services to the areas being annexed.
Charles Radley
12. Charles Radley argued that the annexations would violate Dolan v. City of Tigard and
that there is no "essential nexus." Mr. Radley also provided a written document.
A. Dolan v. City of Tigard applies only to cases in which the City exacts property
from a property owner at the time of a land use approval. Dolan does not apply to
annexations.
B. To the extent the Mr. Radley is arguing that the City could not require the
property owners to consent to annexation as a condition of land use approval,that
challenge is too late. The land use approvals are final and cannot be collaterally
challenged. Furthermore, Mr. Radley was not the applicant or a landowner in any
of the land use cases and lacks standing to challenge conditions that have been
accepted by the applicants.
C. The"essential nexus" requirement is imposed on exactions by the Nollan v.
California Coastal Commission case. Like Dolan,the case applies only to
exactions at the time of land use approvals,not to annexations. To the extent that
Mr. Radley is challenging conditions of approval in the previous land use cases,
that challenge is too late, and Mr. Radley lacks standing to make the challenge.
D. The document that Mr. Radley provided is an excerpt discussing the requirement,
under Rhode Island law,that a building official must issue a building permit that
meets the requirements of the building code. Rhode.Island law concerning
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS--ANNEXATIONS
Page 6
4'
building officials is not relevant to any issue regarding these annexations. If Mr.
Radley is attempting to argue that the City cannot require a consent to annexation,
any requirement regarding consents to annexations by the City are imposed in the
context of a land use proceeding. The City has more authority and more
discretion in land use proceedings than in issuing building permits.
Julie Russell
.13. In addition to issues raised by others, Ms. Russell claimed that the map included with the
notice of annexation was inaccurate as to which areas are included within the City limits
and which areas are outside the City limits. Ms. Russell argued that the City's process
violated Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1. and CDC 18.320.020. Ms. Russell stated
dissatisfaction with the proposed zoning.
A. The maps provided with the notice were accurate. They showed the location of
the properties being annexed and accurately showed areas within the city limits by
a shaded yellow area. There is no requirement to provide a map with the notice of
the annexation hearing. Even if there was some inaccuracy,the maps provided
sufficient information to advise of the location of the properties to be annexed and
their relationship to the City. The City provided notice in compliance with all
applicable requirements. In the event that some person may have failed to receive
notice, failure of a person to receive notice does not invalidate the notice, which
was properly provided.
B. Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.1.1 provides: "The City shall maintain an ongoing
citizen involvement program and shall assure that citizens will be provided an
opportunity to be involved in all phases of the planning process." This policy is
not an approval standard or criterion for an annexation application. The City's
land use regulations have been acknowledged, and those regulations provide the
process, including citizen involvement, for considering land use applications.
That process includes notice and a hearing, and the City provided notice and a
hearing, as required by the CDC. Compliance with the acknowledged regulations
demonstrates compliance with the Comprehensive Plan policies implemented by
the regulations. Citizens, including Ms. Russell,have had the opportunity to be
involved in process. The process of necessity works differently in a quasi-judicial
land use process than in a legislative process.
C. CDC 18.320.020 provides:
1.8.320.020 Approval Process and Standards
A. Approval Process. Annexations shall be processed by means of a
Type IV procedure, as governed by Chapter 18.390 using
standards of approval contained in Subsection B2 below.
B. AnMroval Criteria. The decision to approve, approve with
CITY COUNCIL_ FINDINGS-- ANNEXATIONS
Page 7
modification, or deny an application to annex property to the City
shall be based on the following criteria:
1. All services and facilities are available to the area and have
sufficient capacity to provide service for the proposed
annexation area; and
2. The applicable comprehensive plan policies and
implementing ordinance provisions have been satisfied.
C. Assignment of comprehensive plan and zoning designations. The
comprehensive plan designation and the zoning designation placed
on the property shall be the City's zoning district which most
closely implements the City's or County's comprehensive plan map
designation. The assignment of these designations shall occur
automatically and concurrently with the annexation. In the case of
land which carries County designations, the City shall convert the
County's comprehensive plan map and zoning designations to the
City designations which are the most similar. A zone change is
required if the applicant requests a comprehensive plan map and/or
zoning map designation other than the existing designations. (See
Chapter 18.380). A request for a zone change can be processed
concurrently with an annexation application or after the annexation
has been approved.
D. Conversion table. Table 320.1 summarizes the conversion
of the County's plan and zoning designations to City designations
which are most similar.
The City used a Type IV approval process. The City has capacity to
provide all required services to the area to be annexed, and the applicable
Comprehensive Plan Policies, including those in Chapter 10, have been satisfied.
The properties being annexed already have City comprehensive plan and zoning
designations,that have been adopted and imposed by the County. Ms. Russell
specifically argued that the City lacks parks capacity in the area. However, the
City has sufficient parks capacity throughout the City to provide service to its
residents, including residents in the areas being annexed. The services listed in
the Comprehensive Plan, water, sewer, storm sewer, streets,police and fire
protection, are the essential services that must be available, and those services will
be available to the newly annexed areas. Ms. Russell questioned the adequacy of
the street system. The City Council finds that the street system is adequate to
provide service and will remain adequate. If the properties are not annexed, they
could still be developed consistent with the County zoning, which is the same as
City zoning, so whether the properties are annexed or not does not affect the
impact on the street system.
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS--ANNEXATIONS
Page 8
D. The areas to be annexed all have existing City zones that were established
consistent with Table 320.1. The zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan and applicable Community Development Code provisions.
Scott Miller
14. In addition to issues addressed in the"Issues Raised By More Than One Person" section
of these findings, Mr. Miller stated a concern with an increase in taxes. Mr. Miller also
argued that the consents received by the City are not consents.
A. Mr. Miller does not own property being annexed. His properly is outside the area
proposed for annexation. His taxes will not increase as a result of the annexation.
The property owners in the area to be annexed have consented to the annexation.
Whether taxes may increase is not an applicable standard or criterion in deciding
an annexation.
B. For each of the annexations,the City has either the written consent of the property
owners or a petition from the properly owners to initiate the annexation. All are
valid consents.
Lisa Hamilton Treick
15. In addition to issues address in the"Issues Raised By More Than One Person" section of
these findings, Ms. Hamilton Treik argued that Measure 37 gives property owners rights
that are violated by these annexations.
A. Ms. Hamilton Treik does not own property that will be annexed by these
annexations. All owners of property being annexed have consented to these
annexations. The property owners or their representatives who testified expressly
stated that they voluntarily consent to the annexations. One of them, Tom Weber,
stated that he actively sought annexation to Tigard because of the value it brings
to his property. Measure 37 is not an applicable standard or criterion for
annexation.
16. Ms. Hamilton Treik also argued that the City has no authority to condition land use
approvals or acceptance of land use applications on a consent to annexation.
A. In addition to Findings 6 and 7,the various agreements with the County and other
urban service providers, including the Urban'Services Intergovernmental Agreement and
Tigard Urban Service Agreement, anticipate that the City will provide planning services
and will ultimately annex Tigard's urban service area. Requiring annexation is not
inconsistent with those agreements. Urban Service Agreement Section I.D provides that
the City shall endeavor to annex certain areas, including all areas currently proposed for
annexation. Requiring annexation consents effectuates this provision of the Urban
Service Agreement. The Urban Services Intergovernmental Agreement gives Tigard all
land use decision-making authority over the area to be annexed. Land use authority
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS--ANNEXATIONS
Page 9
includes the authority to impose conditions. The City has the authority to impose a
condition of approval requiring consent to annexation when it receives a land use
application for a property outside the City.
Individual Comments—Post-Heating YPritten Submissions
Julie Russell
.17. Ms. Russell again discussed general opposition to annexation in the Bull Mountain area,
HB 2484, SB 887, Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.Land 10.1.2, and CDC 18.320.020.
The above findings address those arguments.
18. Ms. Russell also argues that the zoning is wrong and inconsistent with the Bull Mountain
Community Plan. The areas have all been rezoned by the County and the zoning being
applied is the zoning required by CDC 18.320. Furthermore, as demonstrated in the
written testimony of John Marquart, there is little or no practical difference between
Washington County R-6 and Tigard R-7 zoning, as applied.
19. Ms. Russell argues that not everyone who was entitled to receive notice actually received
notice. The City provided notice as required by applicable regulations. While it is
possible that some persons did not receive notice,the City complies with the notice
requirements.
20. Ms. Russell complains about possible effects on other service providers. The City has
not received any negative comments from other service providers. All service providers
in the area have agreed that the area being annexed will be annexed to Tigard. Services
will be provided as agreed to in the Urban Services Agreements entered into by the City
and other service providers.
21. Ms. Russell argues that the annexation will interfere with the orderly and economic
provision of public facilities and services. However,her argument appears to be that
services can be provided without annexation. That does not mean that annexation will
disrupt or interfere with service provision. The agreements between the service providers
will ensure orderly and economic provision of services.
22. Ms. Russell argues that the Alberta Rider School property should not be annexed. None
of her arguments relate to any applicable standard or criterion.
23. Ms. Russell opposes the Summit Ridge annexation as non-contiguous. The Summit
Ridge area being annexed will be contiguous with the City on annexation.
24. Ms. Russell objects to the Annexation of Arlington Heights 3 on the grounds that the
annexation will cause annexation to a homeowners association. That argument does not
related to any applicable standard or criterion. Participation in a homeowner's
association is a matter of contract between the parties and unrelated to a City's authority
to annex. Ms Russell also argues that the City cannot annex only part of a subdivision.
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS--ANNEXATIONS
Page 10
.i
No applicable standard or criterion prohibits annexation of part of a subdivision.
Furthermore, Arlington Heights 3 is a separate subdivision from Arlington Heights 1 and
2.
LaVelle and Marie Day_
25. The Days object to the annexation on the grounds that the annexation may interfere with
efforts to annex to King City or to create a new city. This argument does not relate to any
applicable criterion or standard. None of the Days' other arguments are based on
applicable standards or criteria.
Jackie and Gary Kisliniz
26. The Kislings raise issues related to HB 2459 and HB 2722. Those bills are addressed in
the above findings.
Henry-Kane
27. Mr. Kane makes arguments against island annexations. None of the annexations are
island annexations.
Lisa Hamilton-Treik and Tom Treik
28. Ms. Hamilton-Treik and Mr. Treik oppose the process in which the hearings on four
annexations were combined as causing hardship on those who wish to appeal. Even if the
hearings had not been combined, the hearings could have been, and most likely would
have been held at the same meeting. Therefore,the appeals would have all been due at
the same time. Combining the hearings allowed people to state their objections a single
time so as to avoid multiple repeated testimony. All persons were given a full
opportunity to address any issues related to any of the four annexations.
29. They also object to the boundaries as being irregular and question the voluntariness of the
consents. These issues are addressed above.
30. They also oppose the transfer of Traffic Impact Fees to Tigard's TIF accounts. That is
not a relevant issue and does not relate to any applicable standard or criterion.
Philip E. Decker
31. Mr. Decker opposes the annexations as not being contiguous. No property being annexed
will be separated from the City by any intervening unincorporated territory. The
annexations are of contiguous property.
32. Mr, Decker argues that ORS 222.115 allows annexation contracts only for contiguous
parcels. ORS 222.115 does not require that property be contiguous at the time an
annexation contract is signed. One purpose of ORS 222.115 is to allow properties that
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS--ANNEXATIONS
Page 11
are not contiguous to consent to annexation so that they can receive urban services
immediately and be annexed later when intervening properties annex. The contiguity
requirement applies only when the annexation becomes effective.
33. Mr. Decker argues that the areas being annexed are irregularly shaped. The shape of the
area being annexed is not an issue.
_34. Mr. Decker argues that previous annexations were improper, The previous annexations
are final and have not been challenged. They cannot be collaterally attacked at this time.
Comments In Support
35. After the hearing, the City received several written comments in support of the proposed
annexations, including statements from Sean Foushee, on behalf of the applicants for the
Mountain View Estates, from John Marquart on behalf of the applicant for the Wilson
Ridge annexation, and from Tom Weber, on behalf of the owners of the Arlington
Heights 3 property, all of whom stated that the annexation applications were voluntary.
Mr. Marquart and Mr. Weber addressed other issues, strongly supporting the annexations
of their respective areas.
G:Imuni%Tigardlrevisedannexationfindings081705.doc
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS--ANNEXATIONS
Page 12