Loading...
Correspondence /-/ s TavC ?_ cD 3 1 �U Nol � Brian Blalock A /7. '&&' "EX is d iN� 11��iC/ L if . From: Keya Bhattacharyya [bhattacharyya_keya @hotmai .com] � �� t Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 1:54 PM 9 'To: Brian Blalock %t Cc: Keya Bhattacharyya Subject: RE: Spectic System , Attachments: image001.jpg % (� e$ UO G sa) , /L-t ✓ / 'LC/ �7 Importance: High I also spoke with her and her team. She heard all the conversation and her team including the inspector (Heather should know the inspector's name) said since the remodeling is done on the existing slab and yes the existing concrete slab is the part of the foot print, plan review is not required. I don't know what conversation happened between you and Heather when you didn't invite me to participate in the meeting. I don't understand why you are told one thing and I was told another thing. I need the permit as I'll add only living area and not the bedrooms. It is taking too long by the city to issue the permit when I do my share. =Thank you, Keya Bhattacharyya, Ph.D. Electrical Engineer 503- 639 -7206 keya.bhattacharyya5 verizon.net This e -mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and /or protected from disclosure under applicable law. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without authorization from the sender. If you received this e-mail or any attachments in error, please forward this e-mail to keya.bhattacharyya(a verizon.net or bhattacharyya keyahotmail.com and then delete this e-mail message and all attachments from your computer. Thank you. • From: brianb @tigard - or.gov To: Dianna @tigard - or.gov; bhattacharyya_keya @hotmail.com Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:20:19 -0700 Subject: RE: Spectic System I have discussed this case with Heather at the Washington County Environmental Health Department. A concrete slab is not considered the same as a building footprint. I explained the project to Heather, and it doesn't matter what the rooms are labeled, they still need to do a site assessment. The Building Division will not issue the permit until we have received approval from the Health Department. Please get the name of the inspector that said a plan review was not required. . J From: Dianna Howse 1,1, Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 7:11 AM To: 'Keya Bhattacharyya' Cc: Brian Blalock Subject: RE: Spectic System I have forwarded your message to the Building Official. Your permit is not ready to be picked up. The Permit Technicians will contact you when your permit is ready to be picked up. Thank you. (t Dianna Howse Building Division Services Supervisor City of Tigard 503.718.2430 From: Keya Bhattacharyya [ mailto :bhattacharyya_keya @hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 1:29 PM To: Dianna Howse Cc: Keya Bhattacharyya Subject: RE: Spectic System Importance: High Yes, I did; the addition is on the concrete slab and as a result of that the footprint of the house didn't change. Therefore, the plan review is not required. And if the bedrooms are causing problems, I'll change it to only living area. I'll stop by tomorrow for the permit. I spoke with the inspector (Washington County) and per him, plan review is not needed. Thank you, Keya Bhattacharyya, Ph.D. Electrical Engineer 503 -639 -7206 keyabhattacharyya@verizon.net This e -mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and /or protected from disclosure under applicable law. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without authorization from the sender. If you received this e-mail or any attachments in error, please forward this e-mail to keya.bhattacharyya©verizon.net or bhattacharyya_keya @hotmail.com and then delete this e-mail message and all attachments from your computer. Thank you. From: Dianna @tigard - or.gov To: bhattacharyya_keya @hotmail.com CC: brianb @tigard - or.gov Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:34:11 -0700 Subject: RE: Spectic System Brian Blalock, the Building Official for the City of Tigard, has just completed a conversation with Heather at the Washington County Environmental Health Department. According to Heather, you did not disclose to them that you have recently poured a new foundation for an addition to your residence and that your building plans submitted to the City of Tigard included two additional bedrooms. 2 The Washington County Environmental Health Department is requesting that you contact them for a complete review of your project. The City of Tigard will not issue your building permit for the addition to your residence until we have written approval from the Washington County Environmental Health Department. i " Thank you. Dianna Howse Building Division Services Supervisor City of Tigard 503.718.2430 From: Keya Bhattacharyya [ mailto :bhattacharyya_keya @hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 11:18 AM To: Dianna Howse Cc: Keya Bhattacharyya Subject: Spectic System Importance: High I have spoken with Washington County Environmental Department. Per Oregon Administrative Rule Chapter 340, Division 071, since the foot print of the house is not changing, plan review is not needed. Therefore, tomorrow, I'll stop by to get the permit. -Thank you, Keya Bhattacharyya, Ph, D. Electrical Engineer 503- 639 -7206 keys. bhattacharyya@ verizon,net This e -mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and /or protected from disclosure under applicable law. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without authorization from the sender. If you received this e-mail or any attachments in error, please forward this e-mail to keya.bhattacharyya @verizon.net or bhattacharyya_keya @hotmail.com and then delete this e-mail message and all attachments from your computer. Thank you. From: Dianna @tigard - or.gov To: bhattacharyya_keya @hotmail.com Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:33:54 -0800 Subject: RE: Permit # - MST2008 -00148 Dear Ms. Bhattacharyya, Thank you for the copy of the invoice with notations of payment received by your contractor. On J. ; February 19, 2009, you submitted a request for refund for permit MST2008 -00148 for ,_ construction of a 392 sq ft addition. Because the permit fees for this permit were paid by your contractor, the City's protocol is to refund all payments to the payor named on the original receipt, unless the applicant can show proof of reimbursement to the payor. You indicated that 3 all permit fees were paid by you to the contractor in advance of the permit submittal, and have provided a document to serve as evidence that your contractor has been reimbursed for his payment of the permit fees. Per our discussion during your visit to our office on February 23 the Building Official has approved a refund equal to 75% of per permit fees paid as two inspections have been completed • on this project. As per your request, I am transferring the entire refund amount to the new permit, MST2009 -00080 for construction of a 1,024 sq ft addition. The entire refund amount will be applied to the plan review fees that are due in the amount as follows: Building Permit Fee Paid: $203.29 x 75% refund = $152.47 Building Permit Tax Paid: $24.39 x 75% refund = $18.30 Electrical Permit Fee Paid: $53.50 x 75% refund = $40.13 Electrical Permit Tax Paid: $6.42 x 75% refund = $4.82 Total refund applied to MST2009 -00080 = $215.72 Per our discussion on February 23 regarding the School Construction Excise Tax, you were unable to review the requirements with me during your visit to our office, so I will provide you with additional information at this time. Per the document that I provided you, this tax applies to all permit applications submitted on or after March 1, 2008. Your original permit, MST2008- 00148 was submitted on 9/24/08. You were not charged at that time as the tax does not apply to residential use for sunrooms that do not have an opening into the house as per the plans that you submitted. Your new permit, MST2009 -00080 submitted on 2/19/09 is subject to this tax as it qualifies as an addition to a structure for residential use as defined under this document. Unfortunately, the site plan that you submitted did not include location of a septic system which is listed as a requirement for plan review on the permit application form. Upon further review by Debbie Adamski, Permit Technician, she discovered that this property contains a septic system and is included in a reimbursement district for sewer connection. Therefore, you were notified . on 2/23/09 during your visit to our office, that the Building Official, Brian Blalock, is requesting • that you obtain a letter from Washington County Health Department giving approval that your septic system will support the completion of the addition to your residential dwelling. Plan review is complete on this project, however a building permit will not be issued until we receive Washington County's approval. Please submit a letter from Washington County at your earliest convenience so that we may complete your permit. Please contact the Building Permit Technicians at 503 - 718 -2439 if you have any further questions regarding your permit. Sincerely, Dianna Howse Building Division Services Supervisor City of Tigard 503.718.2430 - From: Keya Bhattacharyya [ mailto :bhattacharyya_keya @hotmail.com] d" - Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:59 PM To: Dianna Howse .. Debbie Adamski; Keya Bhattacharyya Subject: Permit # - MST2008 -00148 Importance: High 4 Hi Dianna, I'm asked to send you the copy of the receipt that I have received from the contractor upon the payment . of $2000 by me. I'm told that the above mentioned permit will be cancelled and a new permit will be - issued for the revised plan. I would like to see the refund from the previous permit goes to the new permit. The refund must not go to the contractor. Also I need to know the refund amount. Look forward to hearing from you soon. Thank you, Keya Bhattacharyya, Ph.D. Electrical Engineer 503- 639 -7206 keya.bhattacharyya@verizon.net This e -mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and /or protected from disclosure under applicable law. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without authorization from the sender. If you received this e -mail or any attachments in error, please forward this e-mail to keya.bhattacharyya @verizon.net or bhattacharyya_keya©hotmail.com and then delete this e-mail message and all attachments from your computer. Thank you. . Windows LiveTM: Discover 10 secrets about the new Windows Live. View post. • Windows LiveTM: Keep your life in sync. Check it out. Windows LiveTM Contacts: Organize your contact list. Check it out. Windows LiveTM Contacts: Organize your contact list. Check it out. r 5