Loading...
SCE1990-00003POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. s x� a .:3 1 RETAIL CCyW. A AIL ` 702 SW Pacific Hwy. 2S1 `3DD, 400 & 500 Syys,; -`` AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard ) ss. ) I, alherif hereby certi. (Please Print) That I am a jekl._420.1:Caret ^ for the City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served notice of the Tigard City Council - -0603. 7 rol e of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following . named persons on the M t day of ((J l►, by mailing to each of them at the address shown on the attached list (Marked Exhibit B), said notice is hereto attached, and desposited in the United States Mail on the it/ (--4 day of / VC3 i1 , el , 19 , postage prepaid. y�i$'= -W !fill ✓.+ ,00(Lao ;oa S t eVI;ketd sworn to before me this ! `� day of ? ; v J amp ay�5; AO L•II{ � xf1� PAt Prepared Notice IL PWLVLIO, %. - -- 4�, Thiotary Public of Oregon My Commission Expires: M - iled Notice /Delivered to Post Office Subscribed and sworn to before me this /S a• SoP:a n A� r�v'00�Jb �l,,01i:1,tr„lltlll, \to o•paOOpsm+ otary Public of Oregon My Commission Expires: t% i g q OF r xt � V .;�i �, t 1. i, �'T ,' �, E e� f `. -.. 'v; tµ, 5 ; `i i x_ t��.:.:.�,, •.��. CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon lame= Or r. 1. Concerning Case N r(a)ge SCE 90 -0003 2. Name of Owner: Tigard :pail Center Name of Applicant: €art n Brothers Si << no 3. Address PO Box 1012 City Tualatin State Zip 97062' 4. Address of Property: 1370 S6_ Pacificiahwa Tax Map and Lot No (a) S1 3DD tax lolls 400 & SOO 5. Request: A Cit Council review of a Plannih • Commission on deci , ion for a Sr„,n Code Esce�t� on to ally 5�l increa ®e �.n ®i area u to 1L®_ are __feet-_ r face! an4 a 25% ncreNae j n —si e.,ght f up to 25 feet for a fie•- atadinc s ions ZONE: C-G General Coercial 6. Actin Approval as requested Approval with conditions Denial-- Planning Commission decision reversed; Sign Code Exception is denied. 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hail, and mailed to: The applicant and owner(s) Owners of record within the required distance The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION WAS SIGNED ON No tuber 5, 1990 , AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON November 5, 7 990 The adopted findings of fact, deci s. ion, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Wall, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. A review of this decision say be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (L A) according to their procedure 9. QUESTIONS: If you have any questions, please call the Tigard City Recorder at 639- 4171. bkm /SCE9O -03. BRM CITY OF TIOARD, OREGON SOLUTION N4. 90- IN ¶;v MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF A FINAL ORDER N ulTy COUNCEL REVIEW OF A PLANNING, 1SSION DECISION TO APPROVE A SIGN CODE EXCEPTION APPLICATION (SCE 90-03) PROPOSED BY TIGARD RETAIL CENTER. WHEREAS, the Commission reviewed abe case at itS meeting of Anger -t 7, 1990; and WHEREASI, th Cemmieeien ePPreved the aPPlication with modifications to the original proposal (Final Order No. 90 -19 ); and WHEREAS, this matter came before the City Council at its meeting of October 8, 1990; and AREAS, the Council reviewed the evidence related to the reckagest and the Planning Commi eion decision. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission decision is reversed and Sign Code Exception is DENIED based upon the facts, findings, and conclusions noted in Exhibit "A". The council further orders that the City Recorder Bend a copy of this final order to the applicant . s a notice of the final decision in this matter. PASSED This day of Nov r, 1990. Oi i of Tigard John Soh artz, Council President Pro Tam, ATTEST: Cathy Wheatley Tigard City Recorder SCE 90 -03 . BES f k]. PAGE 1 FACTS 1. General Information Sign Code Exception (SCE 90-0003). CASE: REQUEST: For a r,. ign code exception approval allowing a 50% in cease in sign area up to 105 square feet per face, and a 25% increase in sign height, up to 25 feet. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial General ZONE: C- C (Commercial General). APPLICANT: Martin Brothers Signs, Incorporated Roy M. Boswell P.O. Box 1012 Tualatin, OR 9'6'062' OWNER: Tigard Retail Center 15800 SW Boozes Ferry Road, C -301 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 LOCATION: 13702 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 281 30L, Tax Lots 400 and 500). 2. RaC1cnai In ornmation The Hudson service station previously occupied this site and during the last several years the station had been abandoned. Several signs were subject to the sign amortization program which required their removal because they were slightly over -sized and abandoned (Case No. 88- 102 -2) . In September, 1989, Site Development Review, (SOR 89 -20 /V 89 -24) was approved to establish a commercial retail center consisting of three separate buildings. Prior to construction of that project, the Hudson service station and all signs on the property were removed. The retail center is now almost fully developed and tenants are beginning to occupy the buildings. Recently, the property owner has been requested to remove several strings of illegal banners, as well as an illegal temporary sign. Although a financial assurance has been provided, a final landscaping has not been provided and a minor amount of landscaping remains to be completed. RESOLUTION NO. 90v PAGE 2 ... -a:t e •;;, f ;s: iyek:t1,..a cur ,1s c°;e 4 .s.a 3. .t IflfO t121g Properties to th Y south, east, and north along Pacific Highway are also zoned and developed C (Commerci u 1 General). Residential property zoned He3.5 (Single family residential, 3.5 unite /acre) lies immedistelY west of the subject property. The parcel is located at the southwest corner of Pacific Highway which is an arterial street, and Watkins Street which is a minor collector. S�,_„Ixs�r�a�ti,e�n and Pres�ai The project is developed with three, separate buildings and will probably contain between six and t t. n tenants. At the present time, automotive &puminesses occupy all of the north astern building and half of the northwestern building. The third and largest building on the southwest side of the property is just beginning to be ' scccupied. The project has direct driveway access onto Pacific Highway, as well as Watkins Street. Presently, there are no freestanding signs on the property • The applicant is requesting permission to construct one freestanding sign that exceeds the normal allowances for sign size and height as specified in the sign code chapter of the Community Development Code. The applicant proposes a sign height of 21 feet with an 8-foot clearance at the bottom and sign dimensions of 13 ft. x a ft., for a total of 104 square feet of sign area per face. The aPP1 cant indicates that by using 9 inch letter copy as the minimum size, the 13 ft. x 8 ft. sign dimensions necessary to provide adequate room to advertise the different tenants in the retail center. S. eAgeI1CL, dep is The sui leing Division and the State Highway Division have no objections to this proposs/ NPO #3 reviewed ewed tae proposal on July la, 1990 and the NPO recommends that the sign code exception not be granted because the buildings are significantly visible and the NPO has consistently recommended that additional sign area not be allowed for other properties along Pacific Highway. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The basic standard in the C -G zone allows for one freestanding sign with a maximum square footage of 70 square feet per face and a maximum height of 20 feet. Wall signage is also allowed at a percentage of 15% of the size of the wall that the sign is mounted on. The City Council may grant additional sign RESOLUTION NO. 90 PAGE 3 height and /or sign area, if variation from the standard Code requirements ie accordance wwiththe criteria found in Section 10.114145 and ' Section 15.114.130.0 of the Code. Section 15.114.130.0.1(o) Mates that when a premises contains more tban a sing' ; tenant, but is not defined as a shopping center (8 or more tenants), an additional 50% of sign copy area may be permitted under the design review process (or sign code exception process in this case) so an to adequately identify the separate tenants when it is determined that the increased sign area will not deter fret, thr, pupo a of the Code. A shopping center is a;7.so eligible for a s0% sign area increase. The sign illustrated by the applicant shows advertising space for nine tenants. As mentioned earlier, one of the thr a buildings is fully occupi = d. Also sollywood Video is intended to occupy a significant portion of the third building. Given the space that remains, it appears likely that the center will be occupied by more than six tenants. a ed upon the information present by the applicant, there is not adequate justification to grant an additional 50% in sign area or sign height. The Council finds that the additional area and height would be contrary to the purpose of the sign code which is "to prevent proliferation of signs and sign clutter". The increase in the area of the freestanding sign is not necessary to adequately identify the tenants of the center. SCE 90-03. S/k1 MARTIN BROTHERS SIGNS, - INC. ROi. N. WELL PO .X 1012 TUALATIN, OR 97063 3 TIGARD L CENTER 15800 SW BOOMS PERRY RD. C-301 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 jOHN ..... H 22085 SW BOONES FERRY RD. WLATIN, OR 97062 AFFIDAVIT OF HAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard wing first duly sworn/affirm, on oath -That I served NOTICE OP IC HEARING FOR: I serves NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer ,.�.✓' Tigard City Council A copy (PnbliC Hedring Notice /Notice of Exhibit "We) wad mailed '_.,,o each named attached it eked exhiblt tir on the said not tom NOTICE OF DECISION as hesete bulletin board on the day of Aift in the United State Nail on the ' pc tags prepaid. Decidicn) of which is attached (Narked perms at the a.. s shown on the 2 day of ' :.w ! ... attached, was po =ted on an appropriate 19 and deposited P r®on who elivered to POST OFFICE Subsi4b9p, and ern /af f it r to me on the / day of ao #Dr qq o, � ter' S ^�^ a o� ". NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission E i res bkmAFFIDAV.BKH !. r t ova ti F. NOTICE O F PUBLIC H E A R I N G NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY CIL, AT ITS MEETING ON MONDAY, October 88, AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC ' CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD , TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION FILE NO.: SCE 90 -0003 FILE TITLE: Martin Bros./Tigard Retail APPLICANT: Martin Brothers Signs, Inc. Roy M. Boswell PO Box 1012 Tualatin, OR 97062 NPO NO: 3 OWNER: Tigard Retail Center 15800 SW Boones Fry Rd. C -301 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 REQUEST: SIGN CODE CEPTION SCE 90 -0003 MARTIN BROTHERS TIGARD RETAIL (NPO #3) A City Council review of a Planning Commission decision for a Sign Code Exception to allow a 50% increa e in sign area (up to WS square feet per face) and a 25% increase in sign height (up to 25 feet) for a freestacirg sign. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) LOCATION: 13702 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD, tax lots, 400 and 500) (See Map On Reverse Side) THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RILES OF CHAPTER 18.32 ; OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER MAY ATTEND AND BE =-BARD, OR TESTIMONY MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BE ENTERED INTO THE RECORD. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY RECORDER OR PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON 97223 bkm /SCE90- 03.Bpi LEGIBILITY STRIP (05TH A V E. 'IE.W CT. _L1 ►*f S.W. 99 th S.W. 98 th CT 2S103DD -00200 T'REFFINGER, ALICE D 13530 SW WATKINS TX FU OR 97223 2S3.03DD.00100 .__._..... . • - GILBERT Q B 13610 SW NS AVE TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD-00402 r: W0 m MARION _ NEAL 10605 SW FAIRHAVEN im, TIGIAID OR 97223 25103D 0417 ..' 0' • m. a �e o ®. o O O . A O. o ®. O'.. 4 "CHKISTOPHER A CARLA 10690 SW FAIRHAVEN ►T TIGARD OR 97223 2,1,03DD00430 ..v.•mwa.o+e••••••• • • PETERS; a BARBARA A 10800 SW FAMRAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -00432 ......... .. MHOS, DAVID A AND VICKE S 10740 SW FAIRHAVEN. WAY • V OR 97223 2S103DD-00434 C :RE€ 0M, STATE OF DEPT OFs VETS AF '* DAVIS, HARK B C-01545 )680 SW raminvEN WAY CGARD OR 97223 2S7 ®3DD• -0030( n. e _ • s _: o • a . _ LEWIS, HOWARD F AND HIRAI= 13750 SW WATKIN TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD- 00401. _�oo N 1 0 AND WAINELLA � 90NALD/RANDA 13525 SW WATKINS TI OR 97223 25103DD- 00403.. ..................... 5 ak+rt:v ,:s{ -8 ,..® 14EL J AHD BARBARA L 10645 SW FAIRSAV1ZN AT- TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD- 00418 ..a . .... ®® . ROBERT C AND CAROL S 10725 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY OR 97223 ,e 1O3DD -00431 .. o • e . o a .. .. ®. o ®. 0 . 0 • • s+ t• Mee Eratiai H JIVAND ... O N 10770 SW FAIRTDVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97224 2S103D0-00433 s m m w. . ... . s• , JOHN A AND 10710 SW ninumpEN WAY -04-912i3 25103DD -G0435 •...44444004 COOK, 13735 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD OR 97223 2310300 - 00436 ......... ..s.......... Lo RD, MARION N 10600 SW FAIRHAVEN TIGARD OR 97223 25103DD-Q0437 ......a......• .d MINIM, COL v 13605 SW WATKINS TIGARD 2S1O3DD -00600 ........ _ .s s •... _ _ e . + o TIGARD GRANGE NO. pg148 BY HENRY METZENTINE 12210 SW SOMMERCREST OR 97223 TIG %RD 25103DD -00700 ome.. . ... e.m GIL BERTSON, LLOYD Dip' NE J p� (� 15980 SW CONY PLACE TIGARD OR 97223 OR 97201 2510300-.00900 M , TED L 3030 SW MOODY PORTLAND s OR 97201 2S103DD -03604 ... a .. MULFLUH4 THOMAS EIJOY S FELDMAN. PHILIP El 4444 SW YHON PORTLAND OR 97210 2S1O3D0- O38W ®: NULFLUR, THOMAS 4444 NW YEON PORTLAND OR 972310 2S103DD°O4300 ..................... ...w . m. a ..........o . . CMEILL0 uoisGras F raw 2809 -SW ARR COURT LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 251O3DD-037i •60O O eOee HULFLENto O57! S E /JOYS FELDMAN, PHILIP ' 4444 NW IRON PORTLAND OR 97210 251024=430701 ..................... ISARICETPLACE D_ P CORPORATION 3853 SW SCROLLS FERRY RD PORMAND OR 97221 2S1O3DD -0420 W r STATE OF VETERANS AFFAIRS racmsra, VICTOR 12985 SW 13 TIGARD OR 97223 2510200-.00700 ..................... GAM' THEODORE & 2701 ORCHARD ST SOQUEL CA 95073 25102 91 mo'a.Oe ®aaar.m.oal. ®000.m PORTLAND FIXTUM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 338 NW 5TH , AVE PORTLAND OR 97228 2510• 1O •e••�aroa..soo.•aa ®wao =lift CARON. • 2564 NW PETTISROVE poonaND OR 97210 2S10200-01200 ..................... CHARITY LODGE: NO. 75 IOOF .. ATTN TER L ROBINSON 10330 SW. SCROLLS RD OR 97223 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON county of Washington City of Tigard depose and say: (Please print) That I erved NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: That I steed NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: -® City of Tigard Planning Director ✓Tigard Pl ing COmmiaaioa Tigard Hear s Offices Tigard City Council A copy (Public Rearing Notice/Notice of Exhibit wAW) was mailed to each named rttached list marked exhibit "Sr on the said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto bulletin board on the Po--; day of in the United States Nail on the t postage prepaid. Decision) of which is attached plarked persons at th= addre a® shown on th. 441-P" day of 4-- I9, ntt = shed, was poet - " on an appropriate u ' " ® 1922_,J and deposited day of err s loo Pr "-rson who %slivered to CST OFFICE me on the �� ._ day of NOTARI _°DUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: LEGIBILITY STRIP • CITY OP TIGARD Waal +aeon County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER - AS PLANNING CONNISSI 1. Concerning Case Neer (a) :. SCE 90-0003 • 2. Name of Owner: _TIgfteftjtetail ra. Name of Applicant: Hen Brothers 3. Address PO Box 101 ,® City Tualatin State OR Zip .97062 _ 4. Address of Property: 13 °102 s IacifiSJIis�hwa .�. Tax Map and Lot No( a) .: 2S1 3DD tam eta 400 and 500 5. Request: A eat fq sj.on Code Hx io, 'atonal, to al3cave a 50 jagsjaLEcut,o 105 ®qqare feat r face and a 25% increa®® in A.ign heir° 25 _ ZONE: C -G General Cconu al: 6. Actions Approval as requested Approval with conditions Denial 7. Notice: N tics was published in the newspaper, pouted at City Hall, and mailed to: X The applicant and owner (s) Owners of record within the required distance X The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization x Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE 101NAL ON AUGUST 24, 1 90� gems AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. Kcal, a Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290(B) and Section 18.32.370 which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee ($315.00) and t =anacript costs, (varies up to a maximum of $500.00). The deadline for filing of an appeal ie 3:30 p ® m. 10. Qacati. ®ns s If you have any questions, please , e111 the City of Tigard Planning Department, 639-4171. blast /SCE90 -03 . DKM CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO. 90 -19 PC A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WHICH APPROVES AN APPLICATION FOR A SIGN CODE EXCEPTION (SCE 90 -0003) LEQUESTED BY MARTIN BROS. SIGNS AND TIGARD RETAIL CENTER. The Tigard Planning Commission has reviewed the above application at a public hearing on August 7, 1990. The Commission has based its de zision on the facts, findings, and conclusions noted below. A. PACTS 1. General Information CASE: Sign Code Exception (SCE 90.0003 REQUEST: For a sign code exception approval allowing a.50% increase in sign area up to 105 square feet per face, and a 25% increase in sign height, up to 25 feet. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial General ZONE: C-G (Commercial G - neral) . APPLICANT: Martin Brothers Signs, Incorporated Roy M. Boswell P.O. Box 1012 Tualatin, OR, 97062 OWNER: Tigard Retail Center 15800 SW Boanes Ferry Road, C -301 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 LOCATION: 13702 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD, Tax lots 400 and 500). 2. Background Information The Hudson service station previously occupied this site and during the last several years the station had been abandoned. Several signs were subject to the sign amortization program which required their removal because they were slightly over-sized and abandoned (Case No. 88 -102 -Z). In September, 1989, Site Development Review, (SDR 89 -20 /V 89-24) was FINAL ORDER 90 -19 PC - SCE 90 -0003 MARTIN BROS. PAGE 1 approved to establish a commercial retail center consisting of three separate buildings. Prior to construction of that project, the Hudson service station and all signs on the property were removed. The retail center is now almost fully developed and tenants are beginning to occupy the buildings. Recently, the, property owner has been requested to remove several strings of illegal banners, as well as an illegal temporary sign. Although a financial assurance has been provided, a final landscaping has not been provided and a minor amount of landscaping remains to be completed. 3. I'icinit lnforstation 4. Properties to the south, east, and north along Pacific Highway are also zoned and developed C-.G (Commercial ial General). Residential property zoned R -3.5 (Single family residential, 3.5 units /acre) lies immediately west of the subject t property. The parcel is located at the southwest corner of Pacific Highway which is an arterial street, and Watkins Street which is a minor collector. Site Xnformation and Pro -tonal. Descri tion The Project is developed with three separate buildings and will probably contain between six and ten tenants. At the present time, automotive businesses occupy all of the northeastern building and half of the northwestern building. The third and largest builddine axe the southwest side of the property is just beginning to be occupied. The project has direct driveway access onto Pacific Highway, as well as Watkins Street. Presently, there are no freestanding signs on the property. The applicant is requesting permission to construct one freestanding sign that exceeds the normal allowances for sign size and height as specified in the sign code chapter of the Community Development Code. The applicant proposes a sign height of 21 feet with an 8-foot clearance at the bottom and sign dimensions of 13 ft. x 8 ft., for a total of 104 square feet of sign area per face. The applicant indicates that by using 9 inch letter copy as the minimum size, the 13 ft. x 8 ft. sign dimensions necessary to provide adequate room to advertise the different tenants in the retail center. 5. Agency and NPO, Comments The Building Division and the State Highway Division have no objections to this proposal. NPO #3 reviewed the proposal on July 18, 1990 and the NPO recommends that the sign code exception not be granted because the buildings are FINAL ORDER 90 -19 PC SCE 90 -0003 MARTIN BROS. PAGE 2 � tz -Jyi R a sti t r fix. ,,' ?s ��r. t ;e�,av ^ .f }�:,;` 4+3 t- �5d � #� � ; �1T, tal�.v 4� 1i 4±•, ��.. J 5' ` J .v -.:o, ...� .. .7:::.. +.'� .if.'� significantly visible and the NPO has consistently recommended that additional sign area not be allowed for other properties along Pacific Highway. No other comments have been received. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The basic standard in the C -G zone allows for one freestanding sign with a maximum square footage of 70 square feet per face and a maximum height ooft20 feet. Wall signage is also allowed at a percentage of 15% of the size well that the sign is mounted on. The Planning Comdesion may grant additional sign height and/or sign area, if variation from the standard Code requirements is deemed appropriate in. accordance with the criteria found in Section 18.114.145 and Section 18.114.130.E of the Code. Section 18.114 130.C.i(c) states that when a premises contains more than a single tenant, but is not defined as a shopping center (8 or more tenants),, an additional 50% of sign copy area may be permitted under the design review process (or sign code exception process in this case) so as to adequately identify he separate tenants when it is determined that the increased also y shopping center area will not deter from the purpose of the Code. A shopp eligible for a 50% sign area increase. The sign illustrated by the applicant shows advertising space for nine tenants. As mentioned earlier, one of the three buildings is portion fully occupied. Also Hollywood Video is intended to occupy a significant po of the third building. Given the space that remains, it appears likely that the center will be occupied by more than six tenants. Based upon the information present by the applicant, there adequate justification to grant an additional 50% in sign area but .additional g height is not consistent with the applicable sign code criteria. The increase in the area of the freestanding sign is necessary to adequately identify the tenants of the center and this size is consistent with the Ccode the City. and with the signage allowed for similar retail centers in y C. DECISIOIJ Based upon the discussion above, the Planning Commission approves SCE 90-- 0003 subject to the following conditions: 1. The freestanding sign shall not exceed 105 square feet per sign face with a total maximum sign area of 210 square feet. The sign shall meet the standard height requirements o€ the Community Development Code. STAFF CONTACT: Vi Goodwin, Planning Division, 639-4171. 2. Prior to installation of the freestanding sign, a sign permit shall be approved by the Planning Division. STAFF CONTACT: Vi Goodwin, Planning Divieioh, 639- 4171. FINAL ORDER 90 -19 PC - SCE 90 -0003 MARTIN BROS. PAGE 3 Prior to issuance of a sign Permit and installation of the freestanding sign, all conditions of SDR 89-20 shall be satisfied- STS coNTAcTo Keith Liden, Planning Division, 639-4171. This approval , is v lid if exercised within 16 months of the ' final approval date., It is further ordered that the applicant be notified of the entry of this order. PASSED: This ,2'.12 day of August, 1990, by the Planning Commissi e n of the City of Tigard. f on F. r kl;eZr''ire . dent Tigard Planni l!a u i®eion SCE9O- 03.PFO /kl FINAL ORDER 90-19 PC - SCE 90 -0003 HARTIN Bet s. PAGE 4 MARTIN BROTHERS SIGNS, INC. RC1 M. BOSWELL BOX 1012 TUALATIN, OR 97062 TIC RETAIL CENTER 15800 SW BOONES FERN' RD. C-301 LAKE OSWECO, OR 97035 H, MOORE 22085 SW BOONES FERRY RD. TUALTIN, OR 97062 M 7 t S4"ia 'S t f - . • §t -+? .' iy '� �y: �� Y ;:v" . ..: -v . r .,. STATE OF OREGON County of Washington City of Tigard I, depose and Say: AFFIDAVIT OF ?SAILING (N5e4)(0— (Please print) boing first duly sworn/affirm, on oath That i am � '� tom, for The City of Tigard, Oregon That I nerve NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING FOR: That '1 served; NOTXOE OF DECISION FOR: city of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning COMASE111.011 Tigard Hears Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Rearing Notice /Ei:jtice of Decision) of which. Exhibit "A') was mailed to ach named persons at the a a shed lint a ibit "B” on the day of Jt�. said notice C I OF DECISION as hereto ttached, was post bulletin board on the day of in the United Staten Hai/ on the day of postage prepaid. in att s coed (Marked leas s o the 19� B on an appropriate V.01% .1 9 nq7 .:• *Q , „;'L\T 2 a Prepared Notice 1 ed to on the / day of and sworn/affirm me day �g and deposited % yc y y,77gqe ANN F 4141 OotlS)1 1411111, OTY' My Commission Exp Person ..,i,o delivered to POST OFFICE Subscribed and sworn/affirm to me on the !Lam_ day of NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires; NOTICE OF PUELIAratjtsatrARING HEARING ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED FOR JULY 24 1990 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION, AT ITS MEETING ON TUESDAY, Auqur3t ,, 1990, AT 77e X30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: SCE 90 -0003 FILE TITLE. Martin Bros., /Tigard Retail APPLICANT: Martin Brothers Signs, Inc. Roy M. Boswell PO Box 1012 Tualatin, OR 97062 NPO NO: OWNER: Tigard Retail Center 15800 SW &cones Fry Rd. C-301 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 REQUEST: SIGN CODE EXCEPTION SCE 90 -0003 MARTIN BROTHERS TIGARD RETAIL (NPO #3) A request for Sign Code Exception approval to allow a 50% increase in sign area (up to 105 square feet per face) and a 25% increase in sign height (up to 25 feet) ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) LOCATION: LOCATION: 13702 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 231 3DD, tax lots, 400 and 500) (See Map On Reverse Side). THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER MAY ATTEND AND BE HEARD, OR TESTIMONY MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BE ENTERED INTO THE RECORD OF THE HEARING. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT CRITERION. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 639 -4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., OR CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION (NPO) # 3 . CHAIRPERSON: Herman Porter b /SCE90 -03'. BKM PHONE NUMBER: 639 -0895 LEGIBILITY STRIP AVE. 102 rid AVE. Y k ,.r + -F 2S103DD -00200 oro•eu•weo•wrw• TR FF INGER, ALICE D 13830 SW WATKINS TIGARD 2S103DD -00100 ........ o • ......... r GILBERT, BERTH A 13610 SW WARNS AVE TIGARD OR 97223 2SIO3DD -00402 ,. THWICK, MARION NEAL 10605 SW FAIRHAVEN ST' TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -00417 oeoo ®o eee•o•eoo +oeoo GARDBLLA, STOPHER A CARLA 10690 SW F N ST TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD••00430 ...a! w.o +eea @oeeosoa PETERS; J BARBARA A 10800 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223 25103DD -00432 'o00oeoo••e,eeees61'o S, DAVID .A AND 0 V'I S. 10740 SW FAIR HAVEN WAY ' ' I OR 97223' 2s1O3DD -0043 eee.a,�eoemee.oeeeueow C,REGON, STATE OF DEPT OF VETS AF DAVIS, MIME I3 C-07545 J680 ' SW FAIRHAVEN WAY r.EGARD OR 97223 2 03DD -00436 WARD, MARION I 10600 SW FAIRHAVEN TIGARD 2S1O3DD-0030 a •• o . s♦ s r e u LEVIIS, HOWARD F AND C MIE 13750 SW WATKINS TIGARD OR 97223 25103DD- -00401;. u' • u r• e w �.e r s• o r• e e o r. s e HARLIN, KIM 0i AND TRANEWIL ' .® 90N / A 13525 SW WATKINS TIGARD 2S1O3DD'O04O3 •ea ®1 /•o eo e•,ewoe!o SCHMIERER, MICHAEL 3 AND BARBARA L 1064E SW FRH ST• TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD- 00418.a'eq i do 41, oee ®eeseeeeoe BROOME, ROBERT C AND CAROLS 10725 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223 i, 2S1O3DD OO43i ®a•o.ewasea mse.soos eo 0 B GTIVAIID • .. MARJORIE W 10770 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TTGARE OR 97224 2S1O3DD -00433 a aee • a•eoeuoee • IE, .70 A AND DEBRA : A 10710 SW FAIRHAVEN =GARD ...OR.:9723 OR 97223 2S1O3DD -00435 TC, HELEN E 3.373E SW waimuT ST TIGARD OR 97223 2S1O3DD -00437 s•.e ............000ee FOWLER, COLLEE 13605 SW WATKINS TIGARD OR 97223 2SIO3DD- -00600 m•eayeypee •ese •eo •s TIGARD GRANGE NO. BY HENRY 3�us. TZENTI ®x•148 12210 SW SUMMERCREST TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -00800 •• sees rao•r ..... MI t, TED L 3030 SW MOODY PORTLAND OR 97201 2SIO3DD- 0070 LLOYD . ..eeas•ee�•saeeoe• ooe• GILBERTSON, YD D a3 15950 SW COLONY PLACE TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD-- 00900. .............•.o...... MILLAR . TED 3030 SW MOODY PORTLAND OR 97201 w .. Si'+ F J 1•.. 2S3.O3DD -03600 MULFLUR, THOMAS E/ 3OYCR S % FELDMAN, PHILIP 4444 SW YEON PORTLAND OR 97210 a, a 25103®0 - 03800 eov•wwiswem•'w we o MULFLUR, THOMAS 4444 NW, YEON PORTLAND 231030 -04300 msraesweesoosoreoswoo COGHILL' DOUGH F AND BEVERLY 2809 SW ARROWHEAD COURT LAKE GO OR 97034 2S1.02OC"00701 MARKETPLACE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION r e.. • a o a o: u� a s G- r• ..o o r 3853 SW SCROLLS FERRY RD PORTLAND OR 97221 2S102CC'®01.000 .. . m o r e .............. 2564 NW PETTYGROVE PORTLAND OR 97210 2S1O3DD -03 'f.,.. • o o w o r w s 4 r m,o m murxratrak THar&AS E/JOY , LDt , PHILIP. 6-�� 4444 NW YEON PORTLAND 2S1030D 04209 w� ...r °�,'. eara♦'tremsers;_ .ra ®moo• STATE OF OREGON VETERANS AFFAIRS % ,KACZYN KI, VICTOR 12985 SW 135TH TIGARD ,+ry �p OR 97223 2S102CC ®006` 00 . 0 0 0. o • r a ®r r.'e. r • GANO, TaEODOHE M Gs HELEN E' 2701 ORCHARD ST SOS CA 95073 2810200- 009018. FIXTURE a..00: ®::asw.osrro.6rr ®'. PORTLAND FIX8URX"e LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 338 NW 5TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97228 25102 •01100 .....or ®orsssrosr000s TIGARD LODGE NO. 207 AF AM 15615 SW ROYALTY PAIMWAY TIGARD OR 97223 281020 -01200 .error ... a o a . . CHARITY LODGE NO. 75 IOOF ATTE CHESTER L ROBINSON 10330 SW. SCROLLS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223 MARTIN BROTHERB SIGNS, INC. ROY N. DWELT. PO BOX 1012 TUALATIN, OR 97062. AFFIDAVIT OF HAILING STATE OF OREGON' County of Washington City of Tigard dew L e and say: (Please print) That I am a t �' / for The Off. of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEAkING FOR: That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: i ty of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning COmmission Tigard Bearings C .ff i cer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice/ of which ' ie attached Marked Exhibit "A ") wa aail to each named persons at the address shown on the attached list marked exhibit °'B°' on the day of 19 ,o said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as here c :ttached, was posted o an appropriate bulletin board on the day of ►� � ..,,�?' a 19�® and deposited in the United States Mail on the' ` :: day of m 19 e postage prepaid. P Gparcd •Rot c0/ �tp��)pi�S�Nr&krlef S a � �! d 4:;,itworniaf firm to me on the . aaeaaa ,� : ad • 0,i t, ' r Q O �iL a g 474 g* Tys O � r � oo R 'rarr 4 day of NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGO My Commission Expires: bkm/AFFIDAV.BICH .f: f 4 r i -'.�! .. .�. �.. .....e ♦f. .. .� -:k: . f�. a.. .. .. 1�. ..:. �.+} .^., t .. 4. «.. �`: TY by t1 f' 4x d"y ay t Vie. NOT I C E O F PUBLIC H E A R I N G NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD MAIMING COMMISSION, AT ITS MEETING ON TUESDAY, _210a_24, 1990, AT 7 :30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., TIGARD, OREGON, WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO.: SCE 90-0003 NPO NO: FILE TITLE: Martin Bros. /Tigard Retail APPLICANT: Martin Brothers Signs, Inc. Roy M. Boswell PO Box 1012 Tualatin, OR 97062 OWNER: Tigard Retail Center 15800 SW Boones Fry Rd. C -301 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 REQUEST: SIGN CODE EXCEPTION SCE 90 -0003 MARTIN BROTHERS TIGARD RETAIL (VPO A request for Sign Code Exception approval to allow a 50% increase in sign area (up to 105 square f;uet per face) any'; a 25% increase in sign height (up to 25 feet), ZONE: C-G (General Commercial) #3) LOCATION; LOCATION: 13702 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD, tax lots, 400 and 500) (See Map On Reverse Side) THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES , OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 16.30. ANY PERSONS HAVING INTEREST IN THIS MATTER MAY ATTEND AND RE HEARD, OR TESTIMONY MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO BE ENTERED INTO THE RECORD OF THE HEARING. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT CRITERION° FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BLVD., OR CONTACT YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ORGANIZATION (NPO) # 3 CHAIRPERSON: Herman Porter PHONE NUMBER: 639-0895 bkm/SCE90-03.BKM sc' LEGIBILITY STRIP S.W. 107th AVE. 105TH AVE. C NS.w 104 T AVE. AVE. AVE. EW CT. S.W. 90th CT �� .s_:l:- 1` r• Y• #Y�i 1.�i .L �" .+� 1 n� >: j+.`�i -j' :�. .,S y _ �.�• � a '.mot. '4, - ..r � :>zn � i & t; ri ,, r• r....:y �� 4 r z 2S103DD -00200 ,. s s . ► r TREFFINGER, ALICE D 13530 SW WATKINS TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -00100 a .•.•e• o oa .a GILBERT, BERTHA A 13610 SW WATKINS AVE TIGARD OR 97223 2:S103DD—O0402 . • • • o • . e tees w • BOT"—SWICK, MARMON NEAL 10605 SW FAIRHAVEN ST TIGARD OR 97223 28103DD -00417 e...• ♦..... .......... G .LA, CHRISTOPHER A & CAA 10690 SW FAIRHAVEN ST TIGARD OR 97223 251033DD -00430 .....r..••..e....re•c,o PETERS, RALPH 0 BARBARA A 10600 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223 25103DD -00432 ........ . ...•. HAMMES, DAVID A AND VICEE S 10740 SW FAIRRAV1, PIS WAY TIGARD OR 97223 0 0 0 0 • 2S103DD- 00434'..•.•.•.............. OREGON, STATE OF DEPT OF VETS AP % DAVIS, MARK B C- m07545 10680 SW FAIRHAV:N WAY '`TIGARD OR 97223 25103DD -00436 ..................... WARD, MARION N 10600 SW FAIRHAVEN TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -00600 ..................... TIGARD GRANGE NO 148 BY HENRY METZENTINE 12210 SW SUMMERCREST TIGARD OR 97223 2SIO3DD -00800 ..................... MILLAR, TED L 3030 SW MOODY PORTLAND �F i,C'ti OR 97201 2S103DD- 0O30 eo.•w•�s•aas•.....o LEWIS, HOWARD F AND HIRALEE R 13750 SW WATKINS TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD-0Q401 s• w ooer. r•..a MIIRLIN, KIM O' AiND WALLA HARLEY, DO /WANDA 13525 SW WATKINS TIGARD 2S103DD -)0403 .................... SCHMIERER, MICHAEL J AND BARBARA L 10645 SW FAIRHAVEN PT- TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD.- 0041 ®ppi�a paw: B ,. ROBERT C AND CAROLS 10725 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIG OR 97223 •2S1O3DD- 00431. o..•.....•..e......•. S C T, ERWIN H a1R AND NARjORIE W 10770 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 91224 2S103DDm00433 .•.........s.•... CHAMBERLAIN, ,t7OHN A AND DEBRA A 10710 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -00435 ....... e......... COOK, HELEN E 13735 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -00437 ..................... FOWLER, COLLEEN 13605 SW WATKINS TIGARD 2S1O3DD- 00700 ....... GILBERTSON, LLOYD D. ENE J 15980 SW COLONY PLACE TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD- 00900 ®••.. MILLAR, TED L 3030 SW MOODY PORTLAND OR 97201 2S1O3DD -03600 o 0 0« e• o o �ti s e s o o MULPLUR, THOMAS R /JOYCE S FELDIRAN, PHILIP B 4444 SW VZON' PORTLAND 2S9 03DD 037 rr It o e ee: a« e o a e• s a. Fx UR, TH • 't. B /JOY FELDIMN, PHILIP 4444 NW YEON ' PORTLAND 2S1O3DD"- 03800 MULFLURg THOMAS 4444 NW YBON PORTLAND 28103DD-04300 .......... HILL,' DOUGLAS . AND BEVERLY R 2809 sw ARRostimara COURT LAKE OSWEGO OR 970344 2S1O3DD -04200 STATE OF O r N AFFAIRS '* % KACSYNSKI, VICTOR W. 12985 SW 135TH TIGARD OR 97223 25102 -00700 ................ GANO# T'HEODORE H & B1 T EN B 2701 ORCHARD ST SOQUEL CA 95073 sr so* .e..o•o aaaio.e:. 2S1O2CC 00 001 o ..... e . o a « ..m o - s MARKETPLACE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 3551.6 SW SCEOL RD POTTL OR 97221 2S102C.C- x01000 RUSIN CARON 2544 NW PETTYGROVE :PORTLAND OR 97210 25102CC 00901 .......... R' s - e' s - e e er o . PORTLAND FIXTURE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 338 NW 5TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97228 25101 — 01100 .............. TIGARD LODGE NO. 207 AF AM 15615 SW ROYALTY PARKWAY TIGARD OR 97223 25102CO/-01200 ................. CHARITY LODGE - .. NO. 75 IOOF ATTR EST R L ROBINSON �gOBINSO RD 10330 SW. SCHOLIA FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223 MARTIN SIGNS, INC. RO.tL. M. BOSWELL PO BOX 1012 TUALATIN, OR 97062 TIGARD RETAIL CENTER 15800 SW BOONES FERRY RD C-301 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 HERMAN PORTER 11875 SW GAARDE 333ST TIGARD, OR 97223 y � ( tk'i,i � ♦ y, eiv saGN COPE , CITY OF TIGARD, Tigard, Oregon xCEE , TON P LICATI��. 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 le GENERAL INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION I 3'7b Z� . . R0` W. BOSWELL ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE —. P.O, 80X 1012 TUALATIN, OR 97062 PHONE; 1803) 639.1780 FAX: 15031 620-8477 CASE OTHER CASE NOs RECEIPT NO. APPLICATI'! �`' D EY s r�'6 -DATE: Applica _. •:tents submitted: (A) Application €orm. (1) �` (B) Owner's signatuure /�rritten authorization (�,(C) Title transfer instrument (1) (D) g c d 7 / PRov1I (E) Site plan (pre -app checkl' ist) 1) Sign plan (pre -app checklist) Applicant's statement (18 copies) (H) TAFF USE TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 2. Si SITE SIZE 2 1 PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER* ADDRESS CITY APPLICANT* P' ZIP `' ADDRESS yam. 1012. PHONE UA)431.1.7eo CIT ZIP 7 When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owners) must sign this aL application in the space provided on page two or submit a written authorization with this application. p 2. PROPOSAL S Y e owners cf record of the subiect property req est a Sign Code Exception to all w /Al zz/ (/c�AI ' I) Filing fee ) DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: COMP. PLAN /ZONE DESIGNATION: N.P.O. Number: Planning Commission Approval Date: Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering Sign Permit Number and Date issued. y.,:.r .�" n t.. '�, f .. :. -:�: f ,. � .. .: .... ; �....) T;, •.::1L ". .A..'.: -.. v.. }.,+.. . ♦ ♦� 5...,.• y... H "� a��. F i:<�'.::�- s e ..^ . -. .., t..... .Y a .n. .s.. - ?,.,t, t t ?..,:. ..... ,.Ez .._,,- 1 . ,.:•::r ,� ,.. <., .j. ct' ':i :.t. ". - t.._,3� .F��::" # or µx � ::'.qr' .�,: -.,.. q '.i�' S. eP..� s y, .t,.. :.tr-+ xs o f f r ?i a � e 1 ti �,. w•f'- �, Y r Y} -. 3. List any other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: I, 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT (S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above re nest does not violat,y deed restrictions that max be attached to or Imposed on up the sub ec r ert ., B. If the application is granted,. the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. Ail of the above statements and the statements in attachments, and exhibits'transmitted herewith, are applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, application, may be revoked if it is found that any are false. the plot plan, true; and the based on this such statements D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner (ege husband and wife) of the subject property. (KSL:ht /0739P/7P) 2S103DD®•O0200 ................ TREFFINGER, ALICE D 13530 SW WATKINS T/GARD OR 97223 2. DDei0030 ......... Se HOWARD F AND NMIKEUEE E 13 SW WATKINS` T. 1100011 0 00001100 OR 97223 28103D0- 00100 GILBERT, BERTHA A 13610 SW WATKINS AVE TIGARD OR 9722 23103DD-00401 •...o....•............ • - N, RIM 0 AND WANELLA MAMMY, DONALD/ A 13525 SW WATKINS OR 97'223 2S103DD —00402 .. ............... BORTHWICK, ETON NEAL 10605 SW FAIRHAVEN ST TIGARD OR 97223' 2S103DD -0041 p ..................... G , CHRISTOPHER [I A SS A 10690 SW FAIRHAVEN ST TIGARD 97223 2S103DD- 00430 . . • .........• PETERS, . PM J BARBARA A 10800 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -00432 .........••••..sole•. HAMMES, DAVID A AND VIA S 10740 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -00434 •..... .e. ..a... OREGON, STATE OF DEPT OF VETS AF DAVIS, MARK B C-07545 10680 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD- -00436 ....... ..... a ....:, . • WARD, MARION N 10600 SW FAIRHAVEN TIGARD OR 97223 221023DD-00403 .................... D . , MICHAEL AND B M RAL i : , ,...:;, 5 SW FAIRHAVEN ST TIGARD OR 9722'! 28103BD-00418 • ROBERT C AND CABOL aq S 10725 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223. • 2S103DD .•e.......a...e•e..o : ►� ,�f +DBTe ERWIN H JR AND 0RIE W 10770 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIMM OR 97224 25103DD -00433 •.•.•....••.......o.• ,ERLAIN, JOHN A AND DEBRA A 10710 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIC OR 97223 28103DD -00435 • ... o•o . •oa COOK, HELEN E 13735 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD OR 97223 25103DD -00437 ee e• ••••..••• ..e FONLER, COLLEEN 13605 SW WATKINS TIGARD OR 97223 25103DD -00600 ...e...... ...•.s TIGARD GRANGE NO. 148 BY HENRY NETZENTINE 12210 SW SUNMERCREST TIGARD OR 97223 . • 25103DD -00700 GILBERTSON, LLOYD DARLENE J 15980 SW COLONY PLACE TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD- 00800 ....•..•. ..e.....••. ILLAR, TED L 3030 SW MOODY PORTLAND OR 97201 2S103DD -00900 •e.ee•o..eo.....s.... MI, TED L 3030 SW MOODY, PORTLAND OR 97201 2S1O3DD• 0200 . a {! "a' -e • e • a'* e e w O iY TREFFINGER, ALICE 13530 SW WATKINS TIGARD 25103DD- 0010O' ee:eeae Ae asm..0 `as GI T, BERTHA A 13610 SW WATEINS AVE TIGARD On 97223 251O3DD00402 ..oee.ae.e...eis *60 .0 RORTMNICK, MARION 10605 SW FAIRHAVEN ST TIGARD ;:, t` 97223 2B103D0-40417 oeee ee•aeti►�ame�t.e GAltDELLA, CHRISTOF .a'.' A & caBLA 10690 sw FAIRHAVEN ST OR 97223 TIGARD 2S1 ,x -00300 V...:o , HOWARD F,�i;_ HIRALEE B 13750 WAS. TIGARD 2S103DD.00401 .0os•.e• .• a MARLIN, KIM 0 j AND WANELLA . MARLEY, DONALD/WANDA , 13525 Or WATEIMS TIGARD 2103DD-00403 4 e•.OeO O �•e•ie.e 6 ER, MICHAEL J AND BARBARA L 10645 SW FAIRHAVEN 'ST TIGARD OR 97223 252O3�An °�00418 og, ®e8oeaeeee.000. ®so0 68611CME, ROBERT C AND 2S103DD -00430 ..................... PETERS, RALPH J BARBARA A 10800 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223 2S1.03DD- 00432. w :0 •. s .. .............. HAMMES, DAVID A AND V 10I 10740 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIC OR 97223 �y 2s1 D dpN 9 34 ........ea..o004 •ee ORE 'STATE % DA S, MARK B C -07545 10680 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223 2S1O D cb431 ...........0404a0.000 SCHACHT, ERWIN MARjORIE 10770 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97224. 2S103DD -00433 ..................... CHAMBERLAIN, JOHN A AND DEBRA A 10710 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DDo00435 .os• •.00 •. ®ee •ee. COOK, HELEN B 13735 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD OR 97223 23103=D -00436 ..................... WARD, MARION 10600 SW FAIRHAVEN TIGARD OR 97223 25103DD -00437 .ee•.... ... •.00eo••. FOWLER, COLLEEN 13605 SW WATKINS TIGARD OR 972 2310300 -00600 . ..os•ee s•. o TIGARD GRANGE NO. 148 BY HENRY METEENTINE 12210 SW SUMMERCREST ' OR 97223 yp2�Sg.1g03DDD +p000�80q®� ..................... MILLAR, TED L 3030 SW MOODY PORTLAND OR 97201 25103DD- 00700 ............... .o GILBERTSON, LLOYD DARLENE 15980 SW COLONY PLACE TIGARD OR 97223 25103DD+- 0.0900 a. •.m•.•e...o.,.q.•.e . o... MILLAR, L 3030 SW MOODY PORTLAND OR 97201 28103DD- .03800 O ?.00 r OA9me? • THOMAS E /JOYCE S j% FELDMAN, PHILIP E ;4444 SW O PORTLAND OR 97210 2S1O3DD -037OO - Y' ,11, O fr • • Y O O O ! • MDR, THOM lit7OYCE S. % FELD , PH /LIP B 4444 u NW' rEoN PORTLAND 2S1O3DD- 03800 eme•vss•ewm•wsosv•ye® MHLUR THOMAS 4444 NW TOIL PORTLAND en 07210 t 251O3DD- Q4300 Y •. e. • e o a. s o is ® D o r i o Y q •. s• COGHILL, DOUGLAS F AND TIEVERLY i2809 SW ARROWHEAD COURT ' LAKE OS=GO OR 97034 25102 00101 a ®Yw•aro ®sms•ooe MARKETPLACE DEyELOPMENT 'CORPORATION 3853 SW SCROLLS FERRY RD PORTLAND OR 97221 2S1O3D0 -04200 a• v•e .. o e seso STATE OF OREGON VETERANS AFFAIRS • HACZYNSHI, v 12985 SW 135TH TIGARD p�o� ¢� O 97223 g�2S102CC- 00®.06It+................. . @ s s ®. GANG, THEODORE , N & H 2701 ORCHARD ST :SOQUEL CA 95073 25102 -01000 ........... o ......... KUEIN CARON 2564 NW PETTYGROVE PORTLAND OR 97210. 2510244 -00901 a w Y e a• a a ye ........ o PORTLAND FIXTURE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP' 33S Nw 5TH AVE PORTLAND 2S102CC-01100 ..................... TIGARD LODGE No. 207 AF AM 15515 SW ROYALTY PARERWr • TIGARD OR 97223 2S102CC -01200 •a......o•.•.......... CHARITY LODGE NO. 75 lOOF ATTN CHESTER L ROBINSON 10330 SW SCROLLS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223 MARTIN BROTHERS SIGN, INC. ROY BOSWELL PO BOX 1012 TUALATIN, OR 97062 TIGARD RETAIL CENTER 15800 SW BOONES FERRY RD C -301 LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 HERMAN PORTER 11875 SW GAARDE ST TIGARD, OR 97223 T. M ...�1 +'� t .d S, -;. cr x .s .a F IammemamN. ?., T fi Y f � 2G1O3DD O360O • * ec.* z* d » m a MULFLUR , TEO, g POICE S IPELDIMN, PP 4444 SW YEW PORTLAND 240300 03 ,i mr a O .d .* "i(1 P,' 04,0 ;a a. 25103DD 03000 0•00000000000 000 •0: L+,3 ' 4444 NU TECH PORTLAND OR 97210 2S103DD 04300 0000 6 0 9 O O D* 0 *,a 0 • * 0 ffi =Or EILL 1. AMY 2209 SW AD COURT LANE OSWICGO OR 97034 21102 00701. • • • .0 • • a aa $ •' * O O a •, NAREETPLACR 'DEVELOP .fig NT CORPORATION 3853 SW SCROLLS PORTLAND } 2.03040' • .. WraTE It wawa 12985 SW 1357g 202.02100 202 . .09 PORT D FIZZ= LIMITED R _ . 3 $ NW 5 rownatm ie ;s 'm 'ae a► a 2151020P41000 • a a0a• a Ca aOm .4.a*'• O• as IN CARON 2564 NW PETTYGROVE PORTLAND 281 2. . . d.P' 11 A. •. 0 , 010 �! X •Wop:0•o.N 39b► rzG. y 1•yL s, r AF ,t x 15615 TI ' 97223 2S102CC -01200 00000.000000000000000 CHARITY LODGE NO. 75 IOOF ATTN CHESTER L ROBINSON 1033 ► SW SCROLLS PEOY RD TIGARD OR 97223 26103DD -00200 TREFFINGER, ALICE D 13530 SW WATKINS TIGARD OR 97223 2810300 -00100 ......••a.•••os .•w.. GILBERT, BERTHA A 13610 SW WATKINS AVE' TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -003 "i .................... �z. LEWIS, HOWARD F AND MIRALEE .E 13750 SW WATKINS TIGARD OR 97223 2510300 -00401 ..s•.....wowo sw..w MARLIN, KIM 0 AND WANELLA MARLEY, DONALD /WANDA 13525 SW WATKINS TIGARD OR 97223 2810300 -00402 �•..• ..e .. BOR°I.`Y WICK, 4ARION NEAL 10605 SW FAIRHAVEK ST TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD- 00417 ..................... GARDELLA, CHRISTOPHER A. & CARLA 10690 SW FAIRHAVEN ST TIGARD OR 97223 2810300 -00403 .,m,.. ..•ee, .• SCIIERER, MICHAEL 47 AND BARBARA L 10645 SW FAIRHAVEN ST TIGARD OR 97223 2810300 -00418 ....a. .. .. BROW, ROBERT C AND CAROL S 10725 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223 • • • • • 281030D -00430 ..................... PETERS, RALPH J BARBARA A 10800 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223 25103DD -00432 ..................... HAMMES, DAVID A AND VICKE B .10740 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -00434 .• ................... OREGON, STATE OF DEPT OF VETS AP % DAVIS, MARK D C -07545 10680 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -00436 . .. ...... WARD, MARION M 10600 SW FAIRHAVEN TIGARD OR 97223 28103DD -00431 w.we.... .•••oe.s..s. SCHACHT, ERWIN R JR AND MARJORIE 10770 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97224 2S103DD -00433 •o•• e••...... ..•.s. CHAMBERLAIN, JOHN A AND DEBRA A 10710 SW FAIRHAVEN WAY TIGARD OR 97223 2810300-00435 a •..eooa...e.e• e . COOK, HELEN 13735 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD OR 97223 251030D- 00437 •... FOWLER, COLLEEN 13605 SW WATKINS TIGARD ••••••0••••0•000 OR 97223 2S103DD -00600 TIGARD GRANGE NO. 148 BY HENRY METZENTINE 12210 SW SUMMERCREST TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -00800 ••..e.•.....••.•••... MILLAR, TED L 3030 SW MOODY PORTLAND OR 97201 2S103DD- -00700 0......... ........ GILEERTSON, LLOYD DARNE T 15980 SW COLONY PLACE TIGARD OR 97223 2810300.00900 ............•.... MILLAR, TED L 3030 SW MOODY PORTLAND •0•0 OR 97201 �[r r r x�•�' �r +e.: � �+_tia Y;•�'�A 1; { � sr .y1 A �. -e ¢��'' �'`:.tr �v F y 1 •14j �: 281030D- p03600 pO• ••@•OO• MULFLUR, THOMAS E /JOYCE S % FELDMAN, PHILIP B 4444 SW YEON PORTLAND OR 231030D -037 @000@! ®••o @ @ MUL LUR, THOMAS E /JOYCE S ' PHILIP D 4444 KW YRON PORTLAND OR 97210 2SIO3DD- 03300 ,..................4.. MVL@�LUR, THOMAS H 4444 NW 'NON PORTLAND OR 97210 2SI03DD -04300 O P @ O O © O • O. @ @ • • A • • O @ D @ O CHI, DOUGLAS F AND BEVERLY E 2809 SW ARROWHEAD COURT LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034* 2S103DD -04200 ..................... STATE OF OREGON VETERANS AFFAIRS KACZYNSKI, VICTOR W 12985 SW 135TH TIGARD OR 2S102CC -00700 @o.•••• @ GANG, THEODORE H & HELEN E 2701 ORCHARD ST SOQUEL CA 95073 2SI02CC-00701 • . @ . . .. • p.. • O . a •. O . O C/ O O MARKETPLACE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 3853 SW SCHOLLS FERRY ED PORTLAND OR 97221 23102CC- 01000 e•......• • m@ •.. KUBIN CARON 2564 dal PETTYGROVE PORTLAND OR 97210 2S102CC -00901 @•wmsos•��•ee @•sas•e• PORTLAND FIXTURE LIMITED P ARTNERSHIP 338 NW 5TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97228 2S102CC -01100 ......• TIGARD LODGE NO. 207 AF AM 15615 SW ROYALTY PARKWAY TIGARD 00000000000000 OR 97223 2S102CC -01200 m.m_.•e•,..•...v.e.e CHARITY LODGE NO. 75 IOOF ATTN CHESTER L ROBINSON 10330 SW SCROLLS FERRY RD TIGARD OR 97223 ; in X. � `. �: a'.,' z:.. �z a ✓,p. -,� -�� r t.;i x r'.�ti %t r� � SCALE 1 ".100' SEE MAP 2SI 30A .2 .« s. 1/9 rte. O!!,!.! a ^.4107 99 0000.9 T:71199 ..y,i.T li ♦ A i01H1Line/MAW N OSC. 117 101t1u 37.4734007 CJNC0.1.70 TAX .1014 1400. SA0, 50 1.1300,1301,: 331.05 415 3 3$' 4099 32 400 .0114x. .... _EAST ate 4100 24 23 d 44.30 4133 SEE MAP 2S 1 2CC .94Ae ORIAYO r71s r N 06 r - 1201 99093' 699"0$'7 300.0 ..1. CM. 1100 330.00 .65 Ae. 2 aay 7n� McD(��IAL D so ROAD f iC SEE MAP 2S 1 10AA a INDEX 2S I 4 WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGO SCALE 14100' 1C.5. 1$,1761 w wort 02,1, 810.04 44.01 500 4, '7A:. 4700 4600 314 04.'17 4.04041. In1 191. MO.a 7000 P . taP36'rr 130.30 7802 g : 7700 7900 �n d p I3 J." g817�v17.03 8000 4 q, g" 4 g Jryt, a ..e4 °22'13 "E I0iO3 1004 1500 044.4 4..49 CM. LA?CN. 044.0 1700 1900 2000 2100 101.40 '2200 4.04•07 50 w 4aa•arao °m :S.W. HILL VIEW STREET 1 8600fi I9 7I00U4.43 V11 g S , 160 144.31 Ll w 3000 p 3001 p,fp . so \ e 0 2900 2600 i_ aa.aa I 106 14.01 6500'3,zz L� 3 = .12 Ac A4. �' :oac 63x4 W ri.to2500 I 2400' 2300' s e rep, H 8» �, 4 e aj j 1 -r S It 2 8300 c I t °' y.ro asa.b0 N 1 $ w.24 lro.ob jam) _g A 3 t.. "1 II �. N 60 4 6M1SO2 ®QQ N6.64'1 1 2.. °' — I 0; 8200 1 i. c 3200 s q e I 3 2 _ 2700 � r(��j 10 j8100 m.b. • INITIAL 14 V. .�,,. • 1�6 1 t I • 601= oN Nnalte I S a Neowt� lux afe� 1�r ` �i1x a - 116 > a j �isn i1�ao 1 • 3700 3800 Ncs is 36Aa 1 3900 3100 0 3301 3302 w 34Q0 40A aeaest II ® I A6Ac. 45Aa •39Ae n4. a: c WOO .4640. 1 9 .?l4c• . /sAe.. b .5600 I W. 3300 /BAc 40Ae I M I i o 3 b4. 0 5 EL I :t, I-1. Ci 1 r 11 1gr 8400 4 L25 �. ' 1 M1 'i -. s k 1 Lr .✓' - x N M 1 � ly ! In ti. a 4s S - c . t ,r`� .. ^� j z H -F= s x { .a. S ;j.r � : .� 4 t •> tit th } 'i 4 i ''ii s � �. { a 1 '' a �f 4 `• � ., �'j f -.., {3p a x t ,. �.. a' ... ..� , , ., ..:t .. .�,`� ... � ,.., .a 33,33., +• a .l •,. .� .•;r` ,.�'ti•z, i A 3333. ^t'. .*• ,•.. �. .. r. .i ;. 5:,� .fT•.- .. , '�_,%r -i PROM Tigard Banning Department RE: SIGN CODE EXCEPTION SCE 90 -0003 MARTIN BROTHERS TIGARD RETAIL (NPO #3) A request for Sign Code Exception approval to allow a 50% increase in sign area (up to 105 Square feet per face) and a 5% increase in sign. height (up to 25 feet) ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) LOCATION: 13702 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 251 3D!), tax lots, 400 and 500) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by v rious dep = rtmenta and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation rill be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comment 1990. You may use the apace provided below or attach a separate lett• --. to return your comments. ij ypu are unable to rem nd by tj a above date please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223.-, PHONE: 639- 4171. STAFF CONTACT: Viola R. Goodwin ... PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: bkm/SCE90 -03 . SRM Watt �vu * 1 d4'; FICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICA NP0 NO. ' (2 copies) CITY DEP TMENTS CPO NO. • ding 'Inspector/Brad R. ity Recorder Engineering /Gary. A. ESPECIAL DISTRICTS Fire District (pick-up box bldg.) Parks & Recreation board Police Other Tigard Water District 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 School Diet. No. 48 (Beavr) Joy Pail PO Box 200 Beaverton, OR 97075 School District 23J (Tig) 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 Metzger Water District 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd Tigard, OR 97223 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use & Transp. 150 N. First Ave. Hillsboro, OR 97124 Brent Curtis Kevin Martin Joann Rice Scott King Fred Eberle Mike Borreson Jim Hendryx City of Beaverton PO Box 4755 Bea rton, OR 97076 State Highway Division Lee Gunderson PO Box 565 Beaverton, OR 97075 Boundary Commission 320 SW Stark Room 530 Hillsboro, OR 97124 METRO 2000 SW 1st Ave. Portland, OR 97201 -5398 DLCD (CPA's only) 1175 Court St. NE Salem, OR 97310 -0590 �._._. Other • Portland General Electric Brian Moore • 14655 SW Old Scholia Ferry Beaverton, OR 97007 5. SPECIAL AGENCIES General Telephone Mike Lutz 12460 SW Main St. Beaverton, OR 97007 Metro Area Communications Harlan Cook Twin Oaks Technology Center 1815 NW 169th Place S -6020 Beaverton, OR 97006-4886 NW Natural Gas Don. Thomas 220 NW Second Ave. Pcortland, OR 97209 US West Pete Nelson 421 SW Oak St. Portland, OR 97204 TCI Cablevision of Oregon, Inc., Mike Hallosk 3500 SW Bond Portland, OR 97201 R44YE ij 1 � 4C •�.-- �.'Jx .. ,_ -4 t a ? F STATE AGENCIES Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) ., DOGAH7 Engineer Divisl.on of State Lands Hoard of Health , Coprkmerce Dept. -pied. Park Fish & Wildlife Paarke & RePrea. Div. _.. .. LCDC Subdivision Supervisor PDC Dept. of Energy Fire Marshall Dept. of En iron. Quality _, Other Other Southern Pacigic Transportation Company Duane H. Forney, PLS Project Engineer 800 NW 6th Avenue, BM. 324, Union Station Portland, OR 97209 NUT. ]LST FL i b ( - 71- f .tFa ,t t3 i. L 3 ^ • <....c ,W. Ha .vd. Sox 23397 )regon 97223 at -ax (,r- .ir. 64-05 2510200- 00700 O. 0..A • • 0, 0,®:.0'a O •, ♦..�.:0 GANOte NEODORE F *ASR `dT iTAN E` 2702 if COI :3.1507,2' St` 'Rt, D:'`$E5 TINE EXP I SAWN VANcauv R SeX65- S RETURN TO :ENDED ,tr ,_ x i " .,,xr V+r I �'r i l�. w { .;� ... .�;`,"` ;: ' v c.�`,.:i .... t .'. ;�- L „,:• ,� ::.�...� OFfl�A 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 lard, Oregon 97223 CITY OF WARD John Moore 12702 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, Or 97224 2TYOF TQI 13125 SW. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 AAA .s." „out 041° 'II '14)69'1 L)Pliv‘-- 49 r 41°A 10 v°1?1,- pidt.(c‘c d leVw- 1 flt DEC 5 -- 199'] j V!".,;11Vt‘ (.. .,. j iiL P'i. JOIN H. MOORE 22085 SW BOON TUJLATIN, OR 9 ADO StI$a. Y I {-IK% _F. t tyii 1,1F: 71Y1-+ ...h a in i11 iiill 11 11111111111 11F11111111111116t11I4ila111 MILLS Airliele31 r f � F Tr W. Half Blvd, 3ox 23397 )regon 97223 RECEIVED\ t 3 1 1990 COMMUNITY DEv LOPivirr to --0063 1C F,avo i ,c ge. atiQ 2S10; ' 1000 ....... 2S64 ' PETTYGROVE PORTLAND (6 A n jr 0 .261103010-00402 • O O • O O O O: ®. O ...O O.. (I, O • "6',O e; criORTEIWICKT 'MARION NEAL 10605 SF' 77. f.�7.g7...� a �. 6d� enf. TIGARD cn f, rc ti, y viar f+ ♦'Y v }f - t T 7 HGF� ti Wt ii Y fll� ?i to f t �: �� 1.: rt�f .Tls9�.: �L 1K.♦ .- t4...a. F. � .l''.'.til AGENDA ISSUE /AGENDA TITLE SfgaSad2 Exce ton_ SCE 90 -0003 review of Ted Retail Center,. DEPT ; 0 DATE SUBMITTED 9 7 921 __ ---- PEEVI0US ACTION: _iaa�xiing Co i tst A,prosra.l CITY ADMIN 0 P LIB ISSUE Should the applicant be allowed more freestanding sign € rea than permitted the normal standards of Community Development Code? INFORMATION S This application was reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 7, 1990. The Commission determined that the proposal submitted by the applicant to obt 4 Ln an additional S0% sin area for the center's one freestanding sign was consistent with Community-Development Code criteria for granting a sign coda exception. The staff had recommended denial of the proposal because sufficient information was not presented in the application to .justify the request. The Commission found that the increase was justified due to supplemental information presented by the applicant regarding the .anticipated number of tenants in the center. Attached is a copy of the Commission's final order approving the request (Final Order 90 -39 PC). Also included is a copy of the sign code exception criteria, the minutes of the Commission hearing, and the application. AORTAXIMM.SOMEEPS. le Uphold the Commission decision and direct staff to prepare a corresponding resolution. 2 Modify and approve the application and direct staff to prepare a corresponding resolution. 3. Deny the application and direct staff to prepare a corresponding resolution. FISCAL I T SUGGESTED AC'. ION Uphold the Commission's decision SCE 90 -03. SUM /k3. CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER NO 90 -19 PC A FINAL ORDER INCLUDING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS I APPROVES AN APPLICATION FOR A SIGN CODE EXCEPTION (SCE 90 -0003) REQUESTED BY MARTIN BROS. SIGNS AND TIGARD RETAIL CENTER. The Tigard Planning Commission has reviewed the above aPPlication at a public hearing on August 7, 1990. The Commission has based its decision on the facts, findings, and conclusions noted below. A. PACTS 1. General Information Sign Code ExCeption (SCE 90- 0003). REQUEST: For a sign code exception approval allowing a.50% increase in sign area up to 105 square feet per face, and a 25% increase in sign height, up to 25 feet. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial General CASE: ZONE: C O (Commercial General)... APPLICANT: Martin Brothers Signs, Incorporated Roy M. Boswell P.O. Box 1012 Tualatin, OR' 97062 OWNER: Tigard Retail Center 15600 SW Booms Ferry Road, 0-301 . Lake Oswego, OR 97035 LOCATION: 13702 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD, Tax Lots 400 and 500). 2. Background Information The Hudson service station previously occupied this site and during the last several years the station had been abandoned. Several signs were subject to the sign amortization program which required their removal because they were slightly over-sized and abandoned (Case No. 88- 102 -Z) In September, _ 1959, Site Development Review, (SDR 09-20 %V 89 -24) was FINAL ORDER 90 -19 PC SCE ,90 -00O3 MARTIN BROS. PAGE 1 �• y e M i �.^.. Y ti "%/' i y. F a} rF Y t '''.5..* ,1• ...r`1v ` �,u 4i.. x s `^ + tt ' lixtt M Ar �.„�r ,✓ ,...... a ,,eM� > ; t n �. r 7y � ?' H',� k aX c.:.S .,.}. i^' a �` . F �; � W� �a-..('x}�r 4 � 7 � LEGIBILITY STRIP ,�•� ..��'f r.i v.- r..•. t41. .�Y.:3. ,,� r5k... �. ��.w.T�t -.. „S: Y. .. � -. } appro' od to establish a commercial retail center consisting three separate 'buildings. Prior to construction of that project, the Hudson service s on the nservice all ice station anall sa,� property were removed. The retail ins to occupy center is now almost full.` developed and tenants the buildings. �8property owner has been rested to remove . everalRecently, e 'the.., � strf ngs of illegal banners, as well as an illegal temporary sign. Although a financial assurance has been provided, i final n remains tong has not been provided i' and a minor amount of tan d p g i completed. 3. !ici.nit� Information Properties to the south, east, and north along Pacific Highway are also coned and developed (Commercial General). Residential property zoned Re-3.5 (Single familY residential, 3.5 units /acre) lies, lately west of the subject property. The parc -.1 is located at the southwest c® or of Pacific Highway which is an arterial street d and Watkins Street which is a miner collector. 4. Site Information and Pro sal De,_.cri, ion and will r� will The project is developed with three separate probably contain between sir and ten tenants. At the present time, automotive businesses occupy all of the north w ast ..rn building and half of th = northwestern building. The third and large t building on the southwest side of the pmoperty is just beginning to be occupied. The i.f is Highway, as project has .. direct driveway access onto Pa`,' as monl the Watkins Street. Pte. ent1y, there are no freestanding signs property. Th applicant is requesting permission to construct one.. freestanding T size and height as sign that exceeds the normal allowances for sign specified in the sign code c/ .ftpter of the COmmunity Development Code. The applicant proposes a sign height of 21 feet with an 8 -foot clearance at the bottom and sign dimensions of 13 ft. x 8 ft. a for a total of 104 square feet of sign area per face. The applicant indicates that by using 9 inch letter copy as the minimum the 13 ft. x 8 ft. sign dimensions necessary to provide adequ to room to advertise the different tenants in the retail. center. 5. Agency Fend NP0 Comments The Building Division and the to this proposal. NPO #3 revi. ewed the proposal i code exception State Highway Division have no cbjectioGns on July 18, 1990 and the NPO recommends not be granted because the buildings are. FINAL ORDER 90-19 P SC 90 -0003 MARTEN BRCS PAGE 2 0 significantly visible and the to has consistently recommended that additional sign area not be allowed for other properties along Pacific ifighway. No other comments have been received. B. F /NDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Th - ba - tic standard in the zone allows for one freestanding sign with a maximum square footage of 70 square feet per face and a maximum height of 20 feet. Wall, aignage is also allow A =c: at a percentage of 15% of the size of the wall. that the sign is mounted on. The Planning Commission may grant additional sign height and /or sign area, if variation from the standard Code requirements is deemed appropriate in • = ccerdance with the criteria found in Section 18.114.145 and Section 18.114.130.0 of the Code. Section 18.1.14.13O.G.1(c) states that wh -n a premises contains more than a Ingle tenant, but is not defined as a shopping center (8 or more tenants), . an additional 5G% of sign copy area , quay be permitted under the design review process.(or sign code exception process in this case) so as to =de uately identify the separate tenants when it is determined that the increased sign area will not deter from the purpose of the Code. A shopping center is also eligible for a 5O% sign area increase. The sign illustrated by the applicant shows advertising space for nine tenants. As mentioned earlier, one of the three buildings is fully occupied. Also Hollywood Video is intended to occupy a significant portion of the third building. Given tha space th =, t remains, it appears likely that the center will be occupied by more than six tenants. Based upon the information present by the applicant, there is adequate justification to grant an additional 5®% in sign area but additional sign height is not consistent with the applicable sign code criteria. The increa to in the area of the freestanding sign is necessary to adequately identify the tenants of the center and this size is consistent with the code criteria and with the aignage allowed for similar retail centers in the City. C. DECISION Eased upon the discussion above, the Planning Commission approves SCE 90- 0003 subject to the following conditions: 1. The freestanding sign shall not exceed 105 square feet per sign face with a total maximum sign area of 210 square feet. The sign shall meet the standard height requirements of the Community Development Code. STAFF CONTACT: Vi Goodwin, Planning Division, 639-4171. 2. Prior to installation of the freestanding = ign, a aigr . ; armit shall be approved by the Planning Division. STAFF CONTACT: Vi Goodwin, Planning Division, 639- 4171. FINAL ORDER 90-19 PC - SCE 90 -0003 MARTIN BROS. PAGE 3 8�S it and installation of the freestanding . Prior to issuance Of a sign sign, all conditions of SDI 8 eith Liden, Planning Division, 639.4171• 4. Thin royal in valid if exorcised mfLth n 18 months of the final appeal date.. t notified srf the t �f this that the aYPl i � it f� further o���, gar, order. PASS: This of Tigard. day of z ugu t, 19900, by the Planning Commission. of t,e city FINAL ORDER 90 -19 PC - ScE 90-0003 HARM Mos. dAGE 4 signCdeEP2. A. The Commission or, on review, the Council may grant exceptions to the requirements of this chapter when the applicant demonstrates that, owing to special or unusual circumstances relating to the design, structure or placement of the sign in relation to other structures or land uses or the natural features of the land, the literal interpretation of this chapter would interfere with the communicative function of the. sign without corresponding public benefit. B. When the Commission or the Council approves an exception, the rights thereby given to the applicant shall continue to exist and to belong to the applicant or any other owner of the land for a peri‹,1 of one-and-one-half years from the date of final approval: 1. If, at the expiration of one-and-one-half years from the date of approval, construction of the structure or initiation of the use giving rise to the need for the exception has not begun, the rights given by the exception approval shall terminate without further action by the City, the Commission, or the Council; and 2. Said rights shall also terminate at or after the expiration of one-and-one-half Years from approval if, though commenced within one year, construction ceases and is not regulated within 60 days. (Ord. 89-06; Ord. 88-20) 18.114.145 royal Criteria for Exce!tions to the EiglI2ode A. The Commission shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for an exception to the sign code based on findiaSd that at least one of the following criteria are satisfied: 1. The proposed exception to die height limits in the sign code is necessary to make the sign visible from the street because of the t..yography of the site, and/or a conforming building or sign on an adjacent property would limit the view of a sign erected on the site in conformance With Sign Code standards; 2. A second freestanding sign is '3ecessary to adequately identify a / second entrance to a husinov,, or premises that is oriented towards a different street frontage; 3. Up to an additional 25 percent of sign area or height may be permitted when it is determined that the increase will not deter from the purpose of this chapter. This increase should be judged according to specific needs and circumstances which necessitate additional area to make the sign sufficiently legible. The increase(s) shall not conflict with any other nondimensional standards or restrictions of this chapter; 4. The proposed siva is consistent with the criteria set forth in Subsection 18.114.130.G of this chapter; Revised 02/27/89 The proposed exception for a second freestanding sign on an interior lot which is zoned commercial or industrial is appropriate because all of the following apply: a. The combined height of both signs shall not exceed 150 percent of the sign height normally allowed for one freestanding sign in the same zoning district; however. neither shall exceed the height normally allowed in the same zoning district; h. bleither sign will pose a vision clearance problem or will project into the public right-of-way; and c. Total combined sign area for both signs shall not exceed 150 percent of what is normally allowed for one freestanding sign in the same zoning district; however, neither shall exceed the height normally allowed in the same zoning district. In addition to the criteria in Subsection A above, the Commission, or in the case of an administrative exception, the Director shall review all of the existing or proposed signage for the development and its relationship to the intent and purpose of this chapter. As condition of approval, the Commission or Director may require: 1. Removal or alteration of nonconforming signs to achieve compliance with the standards contained in, this chapter; 2. Removal or alteration of conforming signs in order to establish a consistent sign design throughout the development; and 3. Application for sign permits for signs erected without permits or removal of such illegal signs. (Ord. 89.06; Ord. 88-20) 18.11 e.. 48 Criteria for A royal of an Administrative Exage A. T. -= p se of this section is to set forth the criteria whereby the Director empowered to grant an administrative exception as a prerequisite t <. sign permit for a proposed new sign or an means prerequisite allow the coati ` d use of a marginally nonconf orm nG sign (due only to its dimensions) B. The proposed administrative exe ion(s) to sign height and /or sign area does /do not or will not exce by more than five percent the existing sign height and sign area st :,..;rds that otherwise would be applicable in the same zoning district for same type of sign. C'. The Director shall approve, approve with condx ons or deny an application for an administrative exception based . findings that all of the following criteria are satisfied: Revised 02/27 /89 Page 293 b. b. No freestanding sign, : nor any portion of any freestanding sign, shall be located or project over any portion of a street, sidewalk or other public right- of way or property unless an exception has been granted; When a Premises contains more than a single tenant but is not defined as a shopping center, the provisions of a freestanding sign shall take into consideration the need for providing a signing system which is harmonious in appearance and legible: olb 0/- 40 e9-. 4601‘ 0.16 (i) a. The building owner shall provide, at his own expense, a common support for all tenant signage; and (ii) to an � �,.. r:. '... . +, :. of sign copy area may be permitted under the design review process so as to adequately identify the separate tenants when determined that the increased sign area will not deter from the pgrpose of -this chapter; Shopper centers or industrial parks shall establish single signing format: (i) to an a of sign area may be permitted under the development review process to adequately identify the co, a lex when it can be determined ned that the increased sign area will not deter from and purposes of this chapter; (ii) This incre =} se should be judged according to unique identification needs and circumstances which necessitate additional mrea to make the sign sufficiently legible; and (iii) When a shopping center or ildustrisl park has more than one wain- entrance on separate frontages, a second freestanding sign may be allowed under the design review process. The two allowable signs shall face separate frontages and are not intended to be viewed simultaneously; Yip Legal owners or occupants of properties or buildings which are in shopping plazas and which are directly located or are proposed to be located on a commercially and industrially zoned• corner property(ies) (one or more contiguous tax lots located at the intersection of two or more public streets), shall be allowed to have one freestanding sign along each 'street frontage when all of the following are met: (i) A sign permit shall be required for each sign prior to its erection; 1 Revised 02 /27/89 .,.r a.. u - -.TF . kt, �'w .t.,.".. }..E,a,'.+ .a- y4riy.;i h{A-..`+. 1„. Commissioner F;, agreed the rots neem small, bt ..)said the development Plan nts_ appropriate for the site Senior Planner answered questions about condition 12 which requires applicant to build a pathway. Commissioner Moen moved, and Commissioner Fessler seconded to approve Zone Change ZON 90 -0006, Subdivision SUB-90-0009, Planned Development POR 90-0006, Variance VAR 90 -0025 with the fOTTo�'ng changes to 'Condition 12: Path location and construction sha111bencoordinated with staff and Park Board and Park Department, and at their dritioiljnodified or deleted. Motion was passed by unanimous vote of Commissioners present. 503 SIGN CODE EXCEPTION SCE 90-0003 MARTIN BROTHERS/ II RETAIL (NPO #3) . A request for Sign Code Exception approval to allow a 50% increase in sign area (up to 105 square feet per face) and a 25% increase in sign height (up to 25 feet) ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) LOCATION: 13702 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2s1 3DD, tax lots, 400 and S00 ) Senior Planner Liden described the location and background of the Tigard Retail Center, which is occupied by three buildings. He expl ai rued the size of the sign being requested and how it compares with normally allowed size. He said staff recommended denial of the 50% increase in sign size. He discussed some appropriate conditions to consider if the request is approved. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION John Moore, 22085 SW Doones Ferry Road, Tualatin, 97062, discussed the tenants who will be occupying the Tigard Retail Center, noting the number of tenants had increased since the appl i cati on was made with a possibility of having up to 10 or 11 tenants in the near future. He showed a site plan and described their relation to Pacific Highway. He spoke about the visibility of the signs and driving patterns which influence visibility. He also discussed the wall signage and noted some limitations. There wad► discussion about the square footage of the individual bays, location of wall signs, height restrictions, °and sign code exception possibilities. _ PUBLIC TESTIMONY There was none. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED Commissioner Moen said he favored granting the 50% increase, but not the one foot height increase. o Commissioner Leverett agreed with Commissioner Moen s comments. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 7, 1990 PAGE 8 Commissioner 1**rta asked applicant why this /lie of sign size was not addressed during design review. Applicant explained that he missed the date to have staff grant exception during design review. Commissioner Boone stated he was inclined to accept staff s recommendation and vote against the sign code exception. o Commissioner Fessler asked the applicant several questions about the proposed dimensions. She discussed using the wall signs, and she suggested they are more visible by motorists driving by. o Commissioner Barber stated she would not have a problem granting the exception and was not opposed to the one-foot increase in height. Commissioner Moen agreed with Commissioner Fessler's comments and he suggested using the freestanding sign to Identify the businesses located in the center and using the wall signs to identify the end businesses. Commissioner Moen moved, and Commissioner Leverett seconded to grant Sign Code Exception ISCE 90-O03) to allow a 50% increase in sin area, to reject the sign height variance, and to include the conditions suggested by staff in Section C of the Staff Report. * Motion passed by a unanimous vote of Commissioners present. • ZONE ORDINANCE P12-1:11 ZOA 90-0002 FUEL TANKS "IALL NOWS) request for Zone Ordinance Amendment approval to allow above-ground fUeV torage tanks of 4,000 gallons or less in industrial zoning distrl Above-ground fuel storage tanks are currently limited to less than gallons. ZONES: I -P (Industrial Park), I -L (Light Industrial) L (Heavy Industrial) o Senior Planner Lis 'l advised that these revisions would bring Tigard's regulations into comnetance with the Fire Districts code. He said there were changes to initions, some allowances for above-ground home heating fuel tanks, and a Alowance for above-ground tanks in industrial areas. He expl a VV,V d the DEQ regulations for i n -ground fuel storage tanks have been ted to address the problems with leakage and ground contamination. He sa It is easier to monitor leakage in above-ground tanks. PUBLIC TESTIMONY There was none. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED \\ .nks of 6,000 o CommissfdneriNoen expressed opposition to above-growl gallons for safety reasons. o Commissioner Saporta was concerned about containment in the e)e( t of an accidental spill. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 7, 1990 LEGIBILITY STRIP • yl� .�, :., . V r ... �.. . .?E„..........�.. ... . -..... . ..ter .. L.,., .. r....... :.Y_ . 1 ... .... '..:'.s i�. ,. +v r.. t•� L {J Y .. _ _+a . ...i . .... .: , .n .:.e..':- ...4... ..... i . r,.r..... >.: _ t Y: ... ... .�. ".. •. ... .. -.... ..r. r' ✓ .. , . F. ..c � z .. w .. ..�. .. > .i ya.. n zaa , i. . .. ..l . '.HVl� - WTM DEVELOPMENT REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1� July 19, 1990 JUL 1 9 1990 C! IT Of. IGAND FUNttliNG RE: Sign Variance Narrative TIGARD RETAIL CENTER PM THE Pursuant to Section 18.114.45 Community Development Code, TROP re- quests a sign code exception /variance set forth as an approved option on our pre - approval conference of Nuve7mber 1, 1989 to allow a 50% increase in sign area. Based on topography, depth vs. width of the development, posted speed on adjacent Pacific Highway 9'Wr and the .limited visibility of tenants due to the surrounding structures, there exists a need for a 50% increase in the size of the .monument face to effectively identify tenants. The proposed sigv. is set back in an area designated to allow for 20' sign height Our sign is designed for 21® to allow for an 8' visible clearance. The 13° x 8' sign face gives a total of 104 sg. ft. of face for tenant signage. To assure maxima ipact of the tenants copy, we conclude that 9 letter copy is a minimum. The spacing ' required to achieve this green the number of tenants, is how we arrived at : the 13° sign .face height. The spacing around a letter is what determines its legi- bility, not simply its size. The viewing opportunity for tenants in the rear of the center is minimal due to lot 'configuration. 'and: layout of buildings. North- bound traffic on Highwal 99W would have to completely pass the center and look back, setting up a very difficult cross -read situation to view wall signs. The main pylon signage is crucial to tenant adintif. cation. The viewing angle is a cross -read of approximate'.v :90 pl 1:4 feet and at posted speed eed of � t \ p p 0mph, this angle wctates the proposed signage. The approach Southbound has similar di.fficu1ties. We feel that these adjustments will insure the consumer easier access to the services provided by this center and allow the bus i- nesses attempting to serve this community a more beneficial opportunity Visibility is the lifeblood of our retail tenants. The monument signage allows the community the best possible way to find their required services 15800 S.W BOONES FERRY RD., SUITE C -3 01 LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97035 • (503) 635 -7760 „7'° 061.ANG. Dm • Ze-espg. y 3Y :*".":14 •`.r ��yyh, t y0�� � t t 'O� r � sew fi xr -�a a ti r' 4 *;' S r x�, y °' "� �+. . A .t r; +t:..• t CITY OP TIGARD OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM. SUMMARY AGENDA ISSUE/AGENDA. TIT : , §i n Sodr Emsgption Oa rem 2 TL = Center . I. DEPT HEAD OK � CITY ADMIN OK if 're DATE SDR TTED. 1Ud2a19U P VICUS C° ION: Cit,� Cc uno 1 ani. l PREPARED Wit Li.det REQUESTED EYE Should the applicant be allowed mo e freestanding sign axes= than permitted by the normal standards of Community Development Code? Co Octob r° 8, 1990, the City Council reviewed a Planning Commission decision to approve a Sign Code Exception for Tigard Retail Center. The Council determined that the exception did not meet the applicable Cod criteria and denied the application. This staff was directed to prepare a final order. ALTERNATIVES 'CONSIDERED 1. Approve the attached resolution for den-al 2. Modify and approve the attached resolution for denial. FISCAL_ IMPACT SUGGESTED ACTION cITr Q TIGMD r `.ORE RESOLUTION NO. 9t v. IN THE ?1A R OF T E ;ADOPTION OF A .FINAL ORDER UPON CITY CODiCIL ` REVIEW or' A P NX'► q COMMISSION DECISION APPROVE A SIGN ,-CEDE ION .APPLLuawluN ( 90 -03) "PROPOSED BY TIGARD RETAIL cENTEE. WHEREAS, the Commission reviewed the case at its :meeting, of August 7, 1990; egad �t Ei3E , the Ctmmieelan approved the ,PPlicatiort with modifif4ations to he origi -n al pro aal (Final Order NQ. '90 -it0) ) ; and WHEREAS, this matter came before the city, Council at it'S meeting of October 0,. 1990; and wHEBBAs, the Council reviewed the evidence related t0 the regv ent and ' the Planning commission decision. TOLIREFOFE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning ng i lion decision` is reverel d L:.gn code Exception is DENIED based upon the facts, findings, and conCZA iOns noted in Exhibit 1"A". The .Council further orders that the City Recorder end a copy of this final order to the applicant as a notice of the final decision in this matter. PASSED: This _ day of November, 199 ATTEST: !Cathy Wheatley Tigard city Recorder SCE 90-03. /k1 RESOLUTION NO. 90- RXHIBIT A" FACTS 1. General Information CASE: Sign Code Exception (SOS 90 -0003) . REQUEST: For a sign code exception approval allowing a 50% increase in sign area up to 105 square feet per face, and a 25% increase in sign height, up to 25 feet. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial General ZONE: C- (Commercial General) APPLICANT: Martin Brothers ,Signs, incorporated Roy M. Roswell. P.O. Box 1012 Tualatin, OR 97062 OWNER: Tigard Retail Center 15800 SW Boone° Ferry Road, 0-301 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 LOCATION: 13702 SW Pacific Highway (=TM 281 3DD, Tax Lots 400 and 500). 2. Background Information The Hudson service station previously occupied this site and during the last several years the station had been abandoned. Several signs were subject to the sign amortization program which required their removal because they were slightly over - sized and abandoned (Case No. 88- 102 -5). In September, 1989, Site Development Review, (SDR 89 -30 /V 89 -24) was approved to establish a commercial retail center consisting of three separate buildings. Prior to construction of that project, tit .w Hudson service station and all signs on the property were removed. The retail center is now almost fully developed and tenants are beginning to occupy the buildings. Recently, the property owner he s been requested to remove several strings of illegal banners, as well as an illegal temporary sign. Although a financial assurance has been provided, a final,, landscaping has not been provided and a minor amount of landscaping remains to be completed. RESOLUTION NO. 90- PAGE 2 u •. t'♦ r�.l 4p r. r k t. T ?.* �k . 4 t..?il � . r 1 :�_N. ^.e. nf,. , 9, i �. , r7 .t . _•Y ., a..d 7.: vt Y12.initi_LIDSREIR4I1902 Properties to the south, east, and north along Pacific Highway are also ;zoned and developed C-G (Commercial General) Residential property zoned R-3.5 (Single family residential, 3.5 unite /acre) lies immediately west of the subject property. The parcel is located at the southwest corner of Pacific Highway which is an arterial street, and Watkins Street which is a minor collector. 4. gits9J-InformatiglissaDALRYSISMALSMEREiRtian The project is developed with three separate buildings and will probably contain between six and ten tenants. At the present time, automotive businesses occupy all of the northeastern building and h.:lf of the northwestern building. The third and largest building on the southwest side of the property iF just beginning to be occupied. The project has direct driveway access onto pacific Highway, as well s Watkins Street. Presently, ther are no freestanding signs on the property • Th applicant is requesting permission to constru(t 'one freestanding sign that exceeds the normal allowances for sign size and height as specified in the sign code chapter of the Community Dev w lopment Code. The applicant proposes a sign height of 21 feet with an B -Boot clearance at the bottom and sign dime :lions of 13 ft. x 8 ft., for a tot 1 of 104 equare feet of sign area per face. The applicant indicates that by using 9 inch letter copy as the minimum size, the 13 ft. x 8 ft. sign dimensions necessary to provide adequate roams to advertise the different tenants in the retail center. 5. y And NP0 Comments The Building Division and the State Highway Division have no objections to this proposal. FPO #2 reviewed the proposal on July 18, 1990 and the NPO recommends that the sign code exception not be granted because lx., buildings are significantly visible and the NPO has consistently recommended that additional sign area not be allowed for other properties along Pacific Highway. No other comments have been received. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The basic standard in the C -G zone allows for one freestanding sign with a maximum square footage of 70 square feet per fads and a maximum height of 20 feet. Wall signage is also allowed at a percentage of 15% of the size of the wall that the sign is mounted on The City Council may grant additional sign RESOLUTION NO. 90- PAGE i yr height and /or sign area, if variation from the standard Code requiremWnts is deemed appropriate in accordance with the criteria found in Section 18.114.145 and Section 18.114.130.E of the code. , Section 1S.1144.130.G.1(c) states that when a premises contains More than a single tenant, but is not defined as ai shopping center (8 or more tenant ), an additional 50% of sign copy are'.l may be permitted under the design review process (or sign code exception process in this case) so as to adequately identify the separate tenants when it is determined that the increased sign area will not deter f rai-a the purpose of the Code. A shopping center is also eligible for a 5Q% sign area Increase The sign illustrated by the applicant shows advertising space for nine tenants. As mentioned earlier, one of the three buildings is fully ocCupied. Also Hollywood Video is intended to occupy a significant portion of the third building. Given the space that minas it ap:;w:ars likely that the center will be occupied by more than six tenants. 19a...ed upon the information present by the applicant, there is not adequate ivatific.:ticn to grant an additional 5O% in sign area. 4 r sign height. The Council finds that the additional area and height would contrary to the purpose of the sign code which is o'to prevent proliferation of sign and Sign clutter". The increase in the area of the freestanding sign is not necessary to adequately !4entify the tenants of the center. SCE 90 -03. S/k1 RESOLUTION No. 9® PAGE 4 Senior Planner Liden responded to a question from Councilor Kasten who a ked what could be constructed on an easement. No structures coal be built, but pavement, fences and landscaping would be allowed. Senior Planner Liden advised no exact determination of opoll the location of a sewer easement had been made. Legal counsel said the easement the City retains could be drafted to prohibit not only structures, but other things as well Also, if more than 15 feet was needed for equipment to do work in the right -of-way, then a wider construction easement may be appropriate. Mr. Paul Warner, 10300 S.W. Century Oak Drive, Tigard, Oregon 97223 testified that he owned property facing 72nd and 74th Avenue. He advised he was not against the vacation request but w crol like to see the sewer line brought to the centE r or north side of Cherry Street so it would be convenient to hook on to it when property is developed. e Community Development Director outlined the staff recommendation and noted the recommendation , as presentee in the Council packet, was changed. There was some question whether the sewer line would line up, whether 15 feet was wide enough, and financing options should be explored. He referred to the City Administrator's suggestion that the advance financing technique could be used Community Development Director agreed with A. Ems that the vacation request was premature. He suggested staff would come back at the November 19, 1990 Council meeting with a report on the issues. Council, after considering the staff report and possible options, continued the public hearing to November 19, 1990. Between now and that time, staff will determine . where a possible sewer easement should be located and how much prop. -may would be needed for such an easement. 10. PUBLIC G. SIGN CODE EXCEP.0003 TIN City Council review of a Planning Commission decision for a Sign Code Exception to allow a 50 perceEgt increase in sign area (up to 105 square feet per face) and a 25% increase in sign height (up to 25 feet) for a freestanding sign. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) LOCATION; 13702 S.W. Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD, Tax Its 400 and 500) a. Public hearing was opened. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 8, 1990 PAGE 7 he There were no declarations or challenges Senior Planner Liden summarized the staff report. e advised the s j ect property was formerly the Hudson site. Recently Site Development Review approval was granted to develop the property with three new commercial buildings presently cn the s.z. fie. The applicant applied a Sign Code Exception to allow for one free-standing sign that would be approximately 105 square feet in per side with a height of 21 feet. The Code � of �a size of approximately- 70 square feat and a height The Code, however, does allow for a 50 percent increase in sign area when looking at developments with more than tenant. The Code also allows for a `25 Percent increase in height. These increases are based upon satisfaction of criteria contained in Code Sections 118.114.145 and 18.114,130(g). The Planning Commission found, based, on the actual and potential number of tenants that the proposed 50 percent increase in sign area was justified in accordance with the Code criteria. The Commission approved the area increase. The Commission did not, however, approve the additional one foot in height. City Council called up this item for further review. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission decision be upheld. d, NPO comments: Beverly Fronde, 12200 S.W. Bull Mountain Road, Tigard, Oregon 97224 advised that NPO 3 reviewed this proposal several times. The NPO voted unanimously against the proposal; theNPOBa position was that the i signage regulations were mportaft. They recommended adherence to the Code, especially for a high-visibility building such as this. e. Public Testimony: John Moore, 127 02 S.W. Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon and Roy W. Boswell of Martin Sign Company, P. O. Box 1012, Tualatin, Oregon testified together. Moore reviewed the variance procedure. He said purpose of a variance was to meet individual circumstances Mr. Moore advised be had worked closely with NPO mutual for the last 18 months; he noted their cooperation on the project. The NPO 3 chair, reported Mr. Moore, advised that requests for CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 8, 1990 -° PAGE 8 reported Mr. Moore, advised that requests for additional sign size were always turned down by the NPO. Mr. Moore submitted pictures of the site and reviewed the reasons for their request. He noted. The request falls within the criteria for a larger-size sign. The shopping center is expected to have eight tenants. (Presently, there are six tenants, with room for two more. ) The developer has opt od for one larger sign (instead of two signs) as provided in the Code. Speeds generated on Pacific Highway require a larger sign in order to be noticed by motorists Configuration of the buildings does not allow easy visual contact of some of the tenants in the center. f . Council discussion followed asking clarification from the applicant on �gthe size of requirements center contained gn number o ®f tenants. Council discussed requirements contained in the code and that exceptions mez be permitted if certain criteria was net. Mayor Edwards, , in looking at the photographs submitted by the applicant, was advised that the advertising banners were still being displayed through special permission by City staff until after the sign issue was resolved. The aplicant urged the Council to look at this project from an individual standpoint taking into account the need for visual contact with traffic on Pacific Highway. Public hearing was closedd h. Senior Planner Liden advised the Code provides that during Site Development Review, the Planning Director can approve additional sign area as provided in Subsection .130 (g) . The request would be advertised and noticed along with the Site Development Review with an appeal period. The Code says if you do not elect to ask for additional sign area at that point, an application for a Sign Code Exception must be submitted. The review CITY COUNCIL MEETING MIN1UTES OCTOBER 8, 1990 PAGE 9 F • f f " Senior Planner Liden noted the developer referred to a "variance" throughout his testimony. No variance has been approved or requested -- this is a request for a Sign Code Exception (SCE). An SCE is allowed if certain criteria are met; however, meeting the criteria does not guarantee that the SCE will be granted. Additional information was provided by the applicant at the Planning Co mission hearing; the Commission was persuaded that the criteria as outlined in the Code were meto i . .Council discussion followed; the following is a list of the highlights of their remarks: The Council was concerned about maintaining the integrity of the Sign Code. The developer was aware of conditions (i.e. visibility, rate of speed on Pacific Highway) when the buildings were constructed. There is an eight - tenant minimum before a development gualifie to be designated ass a "shopping center . " It was not absolutely certain that the development would have eight tenants. The Council was not convinced that the signs allowed by the Sign Code would be inadequate for this property. (City Administrator returned to Council meeting: 8 :45 pam0) Motion by Councilor Schwartz, seconded by Councilor Kasten to deny the application for a Sign Code Exception and direct staff to prepare a resolution outlining the Council's findings. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. 11. CONTINUATION �� o BEARING O AUGUST 27 1990: CO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN___T_CMILnnaIONS 11 ®1 Revised Tigard Municipal Code 18.94 ® Manufactured Homes a. Community Development director reviewed the staff report as presented in the Council packet. .Community. Development Director Don Meyer, representing the manufactured home industry, advised he was pleased with the proposed ordinance. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 8, 1990 m PAGE 10 .. ,sip:: :,ti, ?�` . w.. „ s•.t . •t: ..s 4�s ...�.ia ;- { r.? zw .x i - +.r . ..1F :°GU. ?,i - f '� x.,r �c-v: presented for Council review. iuding: ci Wetlands o Manufactured Home Standards • Group Homes & Residential Facilities • Notices to Mobile Home Park Residents • Solar Access Model Ordinance items discussed included the following: • Councilor Johnson noted wetland issues are becoming increasingly controversial use of Identification of certain vegetation for preservation. Councilor Schwartz advised of his concerns ` with how wetlands are designated as a general area on a map. Staff noted that the generalized boundaries would raise ''red flags when ap i �n Is received to develop in or near a wetland The Corps of Engineers and Division of State Lands also have jurisdiction over wetlands and their authority supersedes the City's. Wording changes on °group care facilities" were trade for consistency with state law. State law requires notice to mobite home park residents if there is a zone change proposed for the property on which they reside or if there is a change in ownership. Solar Access: Com unity Development Staff reviewed that the Council would be asked to review the model ordinance. Staff awed: Other jurisdictions have adopted This would be an element of Tigard's Comprehensive Plan policies The model ordinance would be simple to administer Any changes would affect new development (existing development would be grandfathered) The proposal would expand property rights - The proposal would save it mneowners and developers money. Additional comprehensive plan update subjects not before Council at this time. include: Public facilities plan Goal 9 Background (Economic Development) Landscaping, Buffering, Screening Council Recessed: 7:32 p.m. Council Reconvened: 7;38 p.m. e ADDMONAL NON - AGENDA ITEMS: a Loaves & Fishes Contribution: After a brief report f the City Administrator and discussion by Cky Council, the Council authorized a $15,000 contribution this fiscal year to the Loaves Fishes organization at the Tigard Senior Center. Sign e Exception (SCE) 90-0003 Tigard Retail Center; Council rend a recent SCE variance granted by the Planning Commission. Staff's recommendation to the Planning Commission was for denial because, in the staffs opinion, adequate justification was not evident for variance approval. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 20, 1990 e PAGE e'er 'reit t Kd rf.., ?i3:. r ``z,.;r era 'w• .. it` t ?G`�. ei t.,.. itt Motion by Coundlor Johnson, seconded by . COULICEOT KaSteit to pull up for review the Planning Commission decision virith regard to SCE Rem Center. The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Court present Tigard Medical Center - Quitclaim ! p i`: Community Dave!, 4nt Director presented a resolution for approval wit/0 would relinquish a of-way to the State of Oregon. Resolution approval would facilitate improvements underway to the Tigard Center. RESOLUTION NO. -62 A RESOLUTION RELINQUISHING A PORTION OF RIGHT-OF- WAY FOR PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST TO THE STATE OF OREGON, ACTING BY AND THROUGH ffS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, HIGHWAY DIVISION. Motion by Councilor Johnson, seconded by Councilor Schwartz, to adopt Resolution No. • ho motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. d. Fen RetUnd - Dennis Derby Appeal of Seiyu Development Ciity Administrator recommended refund of the appeal fee :.id by Mr. Dennis 'Derby. Mr. Derby appealed to Council a development the Seiyu Corporation on Buil Mountain on the grounds t that requirements 01 the North ett B9 i Mountain Transportation study had not been met. City Attorney advised, during the appea hearing, that the Northeast Bull' Mountain Transportation Study, did not apply to this proposal. Because staff did not clearly outline that the Study was not a binding document for application to this development, the refund was recommended. After discussion, it was the consensus of four councilors to authorize refund of the appeal fee. Councilor Easton advised she did not support the refund. e. METRO Planning: Community Development Director advised the planning directors throughout the region have been meeting and discussing goals. There was concern thaii METRO does not represent a common vision for the region. A representative from METRO will be invited to talk to City Court. f. Tax City Administrator and Mayor Edwards review discussions to date by the Blue Ribbon Task Force on whether or not to pursue a tax base at the November election. The majority of the Task Force supported a tax base proposal at this time to preserve the City's bond sting and to avoid' an undesirable financial condition if the City waits until 1992. After lengthy discussion, Council consensus was to support pursuit of a new tax base proposal for consideration by voters in November. A Budget Cornm ttee meeting was scheduled for August 28 and a Council meeting would be held on September 5 to consider the proposal further. 7. AIL. 8 :30 P.M. Date: ,412 Mayor qb? CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 20, 1990 - PAGE o Commissioner FA, agreed the lots seem small, h" ;:° :aid the development plan is appropriate for the site. Senior Planner answered questions about condition 12, which requires applicant to build a pathway. Commissioner Moen moved, and Commissioner Fessler seconded to approve Zone Change ZON 90 -0006, Subdivision SUB 90 -0009, Planned Devel opi nt PDR 90- 0006, Variance VAR 90-0025 with the following changes to Condition 12: Path location and construction shall be coordinated with staff and Park Board and Park Department, and at their option modified or deleted. Motion was passed by unanimous vote of Commissioners present. 5.3 SIGN CODE EXCEPTION SCE 9011003 TIN BROTHERS/TI AR9 RETAIL (NP) #3). A request for Sign Code Exception approval to allow a 50% increase in sign area (up to 105 square feet per face) and a 25% increase in sign height (up to 25 feet) ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) LOCATION: 13702 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2s1 300, tax lots, 400 and 500) Senior Planner Liden described the location and background of the Tigard Retail Center, which is occupied by three buildings. He explained' the size of the sign being requested and how it compares with normally allowed size. He said staff recommended denial of the 50% increase in sign size. He discussed some appropriate conditions to consider if the request is approved. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o John Moore, 22085 SW Boones Ferry Road, Tualatin, 97062, discussed the tenants who will be occupying the Tigard Retail Center, noting the number of tenants had increased since the application was made with a possibility of having up to 10 or 11 tenants in the near future. He showed a site plan and described their relation to Pacific Highway. He spoke about the visibility of the signs and driving patterns which influence visibility. He also discussed the wall signage and noted some limitations. There was discussion about the square footage of the individual bays, location of wall signs, height restrictions, and sign code exception possibilities. PUBLIC TESTIMONY There was none. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Commissioner Moen said he favored granting the 50% increase, but not the one foot height increase° o Commissioner Leverett agreed with Commissioner Moev 's comments. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 7, 1990 PAGE 8 Commissioner '; ,.,arta asked applicant why this e of sign size was not addressed during, design review. Applicant explained that he missed the date to have staff grant exception during design review. Commissioner Boone stated he was inclined to accept staff s recommendation and vote against the sign code exception. Commissioner Fessler asked the applicant several questions about the proposed dimensions. She discussed using the wall signs, and she suggested they are more visible by motorists driving by Commissioner Barber stated she would not have a problem granting the exception and was not opposed to the one -foot increase in height. a Commissioner Moen agreed with Commissioner Fessler's comments and he suggested using the freestanding sign to identify the businesses located in the center and using the wail signs to identify the end businesses. Commissioner Moen moved, and Commissioner Leverett seconded to grant Sign Code Exception (SCE 90 -0003) to allow a 50% increase in sign area, to reject the sign height variance, and to include the conditions suggested by staff in Sec ti on C of the Staff Report. Motion passed by a unanimous vote of Commissioners present. 5.4 ZONE ORDINANCE i=,, ra Y DMENT ZOO! 90 -00CZ FUEL TANKS (ALL HOP'S) A request for Zone Ordinance Amendment approval to all ow above- ground fuel storage tanks of 4,000 gallons or less in industrial 'zoning districts. Above - ground fuel storage tanks are currently limited to less than 60 gallons. ZONES: I-P (Industrial Park), I -L (Light Industrial), H -L (Heavy Industrial) o Senior Planner Liden advised that these revisions would bring Tigard's regulations into compliance with the Fire District's code. He said there were changes to definitions, some allowances for above - ground home heating fuel tanks, and an allowance for above - ground tanks In industrial areas. He explained the DEQ regulations: for in- ground fuel storage tanks have been implemented to address the problems with leakage and ground contamination. He said it is easier to monitor leakage in above- ground tanks. PUBLIC TESTIMONY There was none. • PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Commissioner.Moen expressed opposition to above - ground tanks of 6,900 gallons for safety reasons. o Commissioner Saporta was concerned about containment in the event of an accidental spill. PLANNINr- /FISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 7, 1990 PAGE 9 AGENDA ITEM 5..3 ST APP RETORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING Ir.TH: AUGUST 7, 1990 7 :30 PM 13125 PW HALL BLVD. TOWN HALL TIGARD, OREGON 97223 . FACTS 1. General Information CAST: Sign Code Exception ( SCE 90 -0003) . REQUEST: For -.a RI sign code exe ption approval allowing a 50% increase in sign area up to 105 square feat per face, and a 25% increase in sign height, up to 25 'feet. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial General ZONE: C-G (Commercial General). A?PZ ICANT: Martin Brothers Signs, Incorporated ,kr Roy M. Boswell P.O. Box 1012 Tualatin, OR 97062 OWNER: Tigard Retail Center 15800 SW Boones Ferry Road, 0 -301 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 LOCATION: 13702 SW Pacific H1ghway CWCTM 2S1 3DD, Tax Lots 400 and 500). 2. Background Information The Hudson service station previously occupie<.1 this site and during the last several years the station had been abandoned. Several signs were subject to the sign amortization program because they were slightly over-sized and abandoned signs are required to be removed by the Code (Case No. 68- 102 -Z). In September, 1989, Site Development Review, (SDR 89 -20/V 89 -24) was approved to establish a commercial retail center consisting of three separate buildings. Prior to construction of that project, the Hudson service station and all signs on the property were removed. The retail center is now almost fully developed and tenants are beginning to occupy the buildings. Recently, the property owner has been requested to remove several strings of illegal banners, as well as an illegal temporary sign. STAFF REPORT - SCE 90 -0003 MARTIN BROTHERS PAGE 1 Although a financial assurance has' 'been provided, a final landscaping has not been provided and a minor amount of landscaping remains to be completed. 3. Vicinit_ nformation Properties to the south, east, and north along pacific Highway are also zoned and developed C-G (Commercial General). Residential property zoned R-3.5 (Single family residential, 3.5 units /acre) lie immediately west of the subject Property- The parcel is located at the southwest corner of Pacific Highway which is an arterial street, and Watkins Street which is a minor collector. 4. Site Information and Proposal Description The project is developed with three a parate buildings and will probably contain somewhere between five and eight tenants. At the present time, there are two automotive business that occupy two of the buildings. The third and largest building on the southwest side of the property is just beginning to be occupied. The project has direct driveway access onto Pacific Highway, as well as Watkins Street. Presently there are no freestanding signs on the property. The applicant is requesting permission to construct 1 freestanding sign that exceeds the normal allowances for sign size and height as found in the sign code chapter of the Community Development Code. The applicant proposes a sign height of 21 feet with an 8 -foot clearance at the bottom and sign dimensions of 13 ft. x 8 ft., for a total of 104 square feet of sign area per face. The applicant indicates that by using 9 inch letter copy, as the minimum size, the 13 ft. x 8 ft. sign dimensions necessary to provide adequate room to advertise the different tenants in the retail center. 5e A ggn and NP0 Comments The Building Division and the State Highway Division have no objections to this proposal. NPO #3 reviewed the proposal on July 18, 1990 and the NPO recommends that the sign code exception not be granted because the buildings are significantly visible and the NPO has consistently recommended that additional sign area not be allowed for other properties along Pacific Highway. No other comments have been received. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The basic standard in the C+ -G' zone for freestanding signs allows for one freestanding sign with a maximum square footage of 70 square feet per face and a maximum height of 20 feet. Wall signage is also allowed at a percentage of 15% of the size of the wall that the sign is mounted on. The STAFF REPORT - SCE 90 -0003 - MARTIN BROTHERS PAGE 2 Planning Commission may grant additional sign height and /or sign area, if variation from the standard Code regPirements is deemed appropriate in accordance with the criteria found in Ssction 18.114.145 and Section 18.114.130.G of the Code. Section, 18.114.130.G.1(c) states that when a premised contains more than a single tenant, bUt is not defined as a shopping center (8 or more tenants) , an additional 50% of sign copy area may be permitted under the design review process (or sign code exception process in this case) so as to adequately identify the separate tenants when it is determines that the increased sign area will not deter from the purpose of the Code. The sign illustrated by the applicant shows advertising space for nine tenants. As mentioned earlier, two of the three buildings are fully occupied. Also Hollywgod Video is intended to cestmpy a significant portion of the third building. Given th- space that remains, it appears unlikely that the center will be occupied by more than six tenants. A simple reduction of the number of lines for six or seven tenants would result in a sign. which is closer in size to the 70 square foot standard while still providing adequate lettering size .•7nc visibility for tho center. Based upon the information present by the applicant, there does not appear to be adequate justification to grant an additional 50% in sign area. After this ca a is discussed further with the applicant during the public heoaring, .0some additional sign area and height may be Justified and consistent with the intent of the Code to minimize the number of signs and total 'sign area allocated to commercial businesses. Until additional information is presented, the staff recommends that this proposal be denied. C. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the discussion above, the staff recommends denial of LICE 90- 0003., Yf additio :a.al signs area is approved by the Planning Commi = sic al, the staff recommends that • at a minimum, the following conditions be applied: • 1. Prior to instal ation of the freestanding sign, a sign permit shall be approved by the Planning Division. STAFF CONTACT: Vi Goodwin,, Planning Division, 639 -4171. 2. Prior to issuance of a sign permit and installation of the freestanding sign, all conditions of SDR 89 -20 shall be satisfied. STAFF CONTACT. Keith Liden, Planning Division, 639 - 4171. 3. This approval is valid if exercised within 18 months of the final approval date. PREPARED BY Keith Liden, Senior Planner SCE9003 /kl STAFF REPORT SCE 90 -0003 MARTIN BROTHERS PAGE 3 PROM: Tigard Planning Department COMMITS DATE: IG J E E PTION 5 '90 3 MARTIN Bi3O®T(E TIGARD TA (NPO #3) A,m,_ eg Cado Exception approval to allo . a 50% increase in A re�eet £cr Sign sign area (up to 105 square feet per face) and a 25% increase in sign height (up to 25 feet) ZONE C (Cmleral Commercial) LOCATION: 13702 SW Pacific Highway COCTH 251 3I3, tax 'lots, 400 and 5O®) Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, t a report and recommendation will be repared and a d:�:cision will be rendered on the proposal in the ne J future. If you wish to comment on this app lication, need your comments 1990. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate lett r to return your comments. if,...y.cm_k_retmallle to rammilfty the afig .te : Please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your a�tm� in writing as soon as poe ®ible. If you have any questions regarding . come this $ratter contact the Tigard Pl�unning Department, PG Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223, PHONE: 539 -41710 STAFF CONTACT: Viola Re cadvain PLEAS3/9HEOK TEE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY A tl We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: f bkn /S (E90-O3 . EKPa f-O003 077 —re. RECEIVED a� +' , JULY 18, 1990 COMMIMAY DEVROPMENt NPO #3 MINUTES THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER AT 9:26 P.M. PRESENT: PORTER, BISHOP, FROUDE, HANSEN, MORTENSEN. SMITH ABSENT: KLINGELE 1. THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FOR THE JUNE 6, 1990 NPO #3 MEETING HAS BEEN POSTPONED AS MINUTES WERE NOT AVAILABLE. 2. DISCUSSION WAS HELD REGARDING ;SIGN CODE EXCEPTION SCE 90 -0o3` - MARTIN BROTHERS SIGNS, INC. IT WAS AGREED THAT THE BUILDINGS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY VISIBLE AS THEY ARE LAVED OUT. ANOTHER POINT DISCUSSED WAS OUR PREVIOUS DENIAL FOR A SIGN SIZE INCRE BE ON OTHER PROPERTY ALONG HIGHWAY 99. A MOTION WAS MADE THAT THE APPLICANT SHOULD STAY WITHIN THE REGULATION SIGN CODE STANDARDS AND THE EXCEPTION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. OTHER BUSINESS r, �t MORTENSEN EXPRESSED CONCERN OVER THE REMOVAL OF SEVERAL LARGE, ESTABLISHED TREES NEAR 99W ON WALNUT STREET. WHILE REALIZING ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ARE CURRENTLY BEING UNDERTAKEN, WE HOPE i t TREE REMOVAL WILL BE KEPT TO THE VERY MINIMUM FROUDE ENCOURAGED OUR ATTENDANCE AT THE WESTERN BYPASS STUDY OPEN HOUSE - BEING HELD ON JULY 26, 1990, IN ALOHA. 6ia t DISCUSSION WAS HELD ON THE JOINT TIGARD - BEAVERTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON 7-9 -90. SMITH CALLED COUNCILOR JOHNSON ON 7-9 -90 TO EXPRESS THE ISSUE OF THE MURRAY BLVD. EXTENSION AND STRESSED THIS CONNECTION SHOULD NOT BE MADE. NO MEMBER OF NPO #3 ATTENDED THE :DINT MEETING. FROUDE POINTED OUT THAT THE BEEF BEND ROUTE IS ALL IN RURAL AREA AND THAT THIS POSSIBLE ROUTE MAY CARRY SAME PROBLEMS AS BYPASS HAS EXPERIENCED. SHE EMPHASIZED THE IMMEDIATE NEED FOR PLANNING DETAILS FROM ALL LOCAL JURISDICTIONS INVOLVED. DISCUSSION WAS ALSO HELD ON THE CONTINUAL CONCERN OF GROWTH AND TR ANSPORTATION' ISSUES AND PROBLEMS IN THE WEST DE AREA. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9 :44 P.M. FILE NO: S FILE TITLE: APPLICANT: MARTIN BROTHERS SIGNS, I MAR ,: BROTHERS SI S-; INC. . OAR: TIGARD RETAIL CENTER 15800 SW BOONES FERRY ROAD C -301 LSE OSWEGO, OR 9703 REQUEST: Applicant requests increase in sign area (up to sign height (up to 25 feet). Sign Code ExcePticn approval to allow a 50% 105 square feet per face) and a 25% increase in LOCATION: 13702 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD7 tax lots, 400 and 500). ZONING DESIGNATION: C -G (General Commercial) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial NPO NO: STAFF DECISION X PLANNING COMMISSION HEARINGS OFFICER CITY COUNCIL _X REQUEST FOR COMMENTS (see attached list) RETURN BY /_/_:.o ATTACHMENTS X VICINITY MAP - LANDSCAPING PLAN NARRATIVE r ARCHITECTURAL PLAN X SITE PLAN STAFF CONTACT PERSON: Vi Goodwin PREPARE FOR PLANNER APPROVAL: x ADVERTISEMENT - TIMES /_ / OREGONIAN / / X NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS TO BE MAILED /_ /®, LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION /_/__ NOTICE TO DLCD - ATTACHMENTS: CUYOF TG RD OREGON - July 9, 1990 Mr. Roy Ee wel1 Account Executive Martin Brothers Signs, P.O. Box 1012 Tualatin, OR 97062 Sign Code Exception SCE 90 -0003 Mr. Boswell, The City of Tigard is recPeating that a narrative be provided as part of the application packet for the. Sign Code Exception which Martin Brothers Signs has applied for on behalf of the Tigard Retail Center. As we had discussed on June 2S, July 2 and July 3, this narrative was to be uhmitted by 12:00 noon on Thursday, July 5th in order that this application could be heard at the July 24th Planning Commis ion meeting. AS of the morning of July 9th, the City has received no such narrative. Consequently, the hearing date of SCE 90 -0003 has been moved to the August 7th Planning Commission. It is suggested that the reqUested narrative be .- ubmitted as soon as possible. If I may be of any assistance or if you have any questions or co .ents please contact the City of Tigard Planning Department at 639 -4171. Sincerely, Ron Pomeroy Development Assistance Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, rgard, Oregon 97223 (503)639-4171 Pursuant to Section ' 18.1 14.45 Community Development Code. 'FRCP requests a sign code exception /variance, set forth as an approved option in our pre - approval conference of Nov 1, 1989 to allow a 50% increase in sign area In our opinion based on Topography, Depth vs Width of the development, posted speed on adjacent Pacific Highway 99W and visibility of tenants due to the surrounding structures, there exists a need for a 50% increase in the size of the monument face to effectively identify tenants. The proposed sign is set back 20 feet from the front property line. this set back would normally allow a maximum sign height of 20 feet and a sign a.ea of 70 square feet. Section 18.114.130 (g) allows a sign area increase of 50%, which would allow 105 sq ft. of face. Our proposed sign is 104 sq. ft. and the increase in height equals a 20% increase. We feel that these adjustments will insure the consumer easier access to the services provided by this center and the businesses attempting to serve this community a more beneficial opportunity. As you are aware, the visibility is the lifeblood of our retail tenants and the monument signage allows the community the best possible way to find their required services. 15800 S.W. B®ONES FERRY 1D., SUITE C -301 ® LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97035 m (503) 635 -7760 SCE 90-0003 229MBILAUMILCENTER M R IN BROTHERS SIGNS I c lied Martin Brothers Signs on. July 16th at 6:05 p.m. Roy Boswell was not in the office oo I spoke to receptionist- She told me that she would communicate the following to Mr. Boswell: The City needs to receiv the narrative for SOB 90 -0003 by 3:30 tomorrow July 17th. If we do not receive the narrative by this time the city will have no choice but to put off the hearing till the 21st. i was told that I should be . hearing from the "apgrapriat - sources" by 3:30 Tuesday. PRE - APPLICATION CHECKLISTS FOR SIGN CODE EXCEPTION AND ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCES DATE: PUONE ° Al]. application shall be made on forms provided by the Director or designee and shall be accompanied by: Sheet size for plans) and any required drawings shall preferably be drawn on sheets not to exceed 18 inches by 24 inches; and 2. The scale of the sign site plan shall be an engineering scale; and 3. % All drawings of the sign elevations and structural components shall be standard architectural scale, being one - fourth inch or one -eighth inch; 4. The required information may be combined and may not have to be placed on separate maps. IGN CODE EXCEPTION OR SIGN VARIANCE APP. TYPE: �Ct, d r e..7 (A) Three copies for review by the ' Director of the sign plans(s) and any necessary data or narrative which explains how the sign plan proposal conforms to the standards. Fifteen copies for review by the Planjino fission of the sign plans for sign code exception: No. Copies f5-. REQUIRED RECEIVED (B) The Proposed t shall include the following information: 1. The location of the proposed sign, and all existing signs on the site; 2. The location of all existing and proposed buildings on the site; 3. The location of all existing and proposed streets and rights -of -way, including names and widths; and 4. The location of all overhead power and utility lines located the site; 5. The distance of the sign to the nearest public rights) -of -way; 6. The address of the site where the sign will be located; and 7. The name, address, and phone number of the applicant. (C) The propos0d r -ff"P 1P l tta shall REQUIRED RECEIVED including the following information: ao 1. The sign dimensions; 2. the materials and colors to be used; 3. The height of the sign above the ground; 4. The source and intensity of and illumination; and �. construction drawing®, indicating size of footings, anchorage® and welds. 6. The address of the site where the sign(a) will be located; For those cases where an existing sign is to be modified, the applicant shall provide documentation or verifiable proof of when a ign was enacted, and wherever pa®®Lb1ea shall submit apy of the original sign permit; e . Dietance of the Proposed freeway-oriented freestanding sign to the freeway interchange off-ramp. (D) A list of the names and addresse of all Persons who are property owners or record within 250 feet of the site. (E) Applicant n a statement (No. Copies ) (F) Proof of current City business tax certificate. (G) A tax assessor's map (8) A title transfer instrument (1; The required fee (S. /,%iu 1a. COATS: (1 1 ( 1_ E I //2/(---1, jr /pre -app. d6 /5 Pursuant to Section 18.114.45 Community Development Code. ''RCP requests a sign code exception /variance, set forth as an approved option in our pre- approval conference of Nov 1, 1989 to allow a 50% increase in Sign area In our opinion based on Topography, Depth vs Width of the development, posted speed on adjacent Pacific Highway 99W and visibility of tenants due to the surrounding structures, there exists a need for a 50% increase in the size of the monument face to effectively identify tenants. The ro. osed sign is set back 20 feet from the front property dine. P p this set back would normally allow a maxin um sign height of 20 feet and a sign area of 70 square feet. Section 18.114.130 (g) allows a sign area increase of 50%, which would allow 105 sq. ft of face. Our proposed sign is 104 sq. ft. and the increase in height equals a 20% increase. We feel that these adjustments will insure the consumer easier access to the services provided by this center and the businesses attempting to serve this community a more beneficial opportunity. As Y ou are aware, the visibility is the lifeblood of our retail tenants and the monument signage allows the community the best possible way to find their required services., 15800 S.W. BOONES FERRY RD., ;;vita C -301 ® LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97035 ® (503) 635 -7760 • RE SIGN CODE EXCEPTION SCE 9OE -0003 B /TIGi9 ii RETAIL (N PO ) A requeat for Sign Code Exception approval to allow. a 50% increase in sign area (up to 105 aquas feet Per face) and a 25% increase in sign height (up to 25 feet) 70NE: C-G (General Commercial) NATION: 13702 Sir Pacific Highway CWCTM 251 3Db, tax lots, 400 and 3O0) Attacized is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your r viewp From information supplied by various departments and Agencies and -from other information available to our sa taffo a report and recommendation will be prepargd and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near uture.. If you wish to comment on this application, cation, tsar 1990. You may use the space provided Mow oV attach a Beparate lett r to return your comthents. If you are unable peappnd b th_ above date please phone the -staff contact noted below with your comments and Confirm Your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regardiglg this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, PO Box 23397, 13125 Vg Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR '97323. PHONE: 639- -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Viola R. Goodwin . . FL EASE C CK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS T APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number bkm/SCE90-03.BKH FROM: Tigard Planning Department : SIGN CODE EXCEPTIONOTHETIGARD RETAIL (NPO #3) A request for Sign code Exception appeal to allow a 50% increase in sign area (up to 105 square feet Per face) and a 25% increase in sign height (up to 25 feet) ZONE: G-4 (General + M nercial) LOCATION: 13702 SW Pacific Highway CWCTM 2S1 300e tax lets, 400 and SOD' Attached is the Site Plan and applicaaAt ° ;s statement for your review. From information supplied by variouE departments and agencies and . from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be pr pared and a decision will be rendered on the proposel in` the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments IV 7,6 1990. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate lett to return your comments. If ou are unable to t9-E9MRSMALIMANLigiMUMLJailtitg. pl ase phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P0 Box 23397, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigarde OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Viola R. Goodwin PLEASE CHECK THE 'FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: A We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Cos menti Phone Number: bkm /SCE9O -03 . Phi WTM DEVELOPMENT REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 19, 1990 JUL 19` 7990 0 iw0 PLANNINQ DE . RE: Sign Variance Narrative TIGARD RETAIL CENTER PARTNERS Pursuant to Section 18 14.45 Community Development Code TROP re- quests a sign code exception /variance set forth as an approved option on our pre- approval conference of November 1, 1989 to allow a 50 increase in sign area Based on topography, depth vs. width of the development, posted speed on adjacent Pacific Highway 99W and the limited visibility of tenants due to the surrounding structures, there exists a need for a 50% increase in the size of the monument face to effectively identify tenants. The proposed sign is set back in an area designated to allow for 20' sign _height. Our sign is designed for 21' to allow for an 8' visible clearance. The 13° x 8' sign face gives a total of 104 sg. ft. of face for tenant signage. To assure maximum impact of the tenants copy, we conclude that 9" letter copy is a minimum. The spacing required to achieve this, given the number of tenants, is how we arrived at the 13' sign face height. The spacing around a letter is what determines its legi- bility, not simply its size. The viewing opportunity for tenants in the rear of the center is minimal due to lot configuration and layout of buildings. North- bound traffic on Highway 99W would have to completely pass the center and look back, setting up a very difficult cross -read situation to view wall signs. The main pylon signage is crucial to tenant identification. The viewing angle is a cross-read of approximately 90 plus feet and at the posted speed of 40mph, this angle dictates the proposed signage. The approach Southbound has similar difficulties. We feel that these adjustments will insure the consumer easier access to the services provided by this center and allow the busi- nesses attempting to serve this community a more beneficial opportunity. Visibility is the lifeblood of our retail tenants. The monument signage allows the community the best possible way to find their required services. 15800 SW. BOODLES FERRY RD., SUITE C -301 LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97035 (503) 635 -7760 rmit No. CITY OF rIGARD SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION The applicant hereby applies for a permit for the work indicated or as shown in the accompanying plans and specifications. ,� � ` rry SIGN LOCATION ADDRESS: tJ'�J .:r. TIAJ ZONING: e.' . , NAME OF BUSINESS: COMPANY : / f = The City of Tigard imposes an annual Business Tax which must be kept current on all persons doing business in the City. ®n you presently have a current Business Tax? PERMANENT. O TEMPORARY ( ) OTHER ( ) SIGN DIMENSIONS: TOTAL SIGN AREA (Sq. Ft.): WALL AREA (Sq. Ft.): WALL FACE: HEIGHT (ft):.- PROJECTION FROM WALL: ILLUMINATION: YES ) NO ( as apply) FREESTANDING ) WALL ( ) BILLBOARD ( ) EXPIRATION DATE: TYPE: ADMINISTRATIVE EXCEPTION: APPROVED [ 3 N/A ( ] AREA [ ] HEIGHT ( 3` HOW MUCH__ COMMENTS: PI._ANNINUG DEPARTN F F3ernra�t tee .- _._ . MIE._.... Apr cved . ES.Y Date ELECTRICAL PE RM1. REQUIRED: YES ( ) NO BUDDING DING PLRMI 1 REQUIRED: YES ( ) NO ( All sign ptrmiLs must be accompanied by a scale drawing rand plot plan if work authorized under a sign permit has not been completed within ninety days after the issuance of the permit, the permit. shall become null and id : I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE RECORDED OWNER OF THE PROPERTY OR AN AGENT AUTHORIZED BY THE OWNER. LL) IThitiwi lbw& s gin aNt. Applicant's Signature ecK Otz 93pc22. Address 1 o h. phone• LEGIBILITY STRIP .DV 96 0 e "SW 1%00144911 9'93- alstaon- cv ® 1 M, (Z90Zi*ON•S"3) z � ��gait o 69'2,1 • ry N i V..._ ♦ n s.. {..:r so ♦<.' r;r:' a. .. :: :..; 'R �G'�z. -y� -T :. i o- ,. 1, _a.. -t ..:d k ..a -.., Y i't�t: t... Zvem St •. i�{, .., y or.2 WALL.) tx, +• ':,'4 ,at', +":, PRE ^APPLICATION CHECKLISTS S FOR SIGN CODE EXCEPTION AND ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCES DATE: /r e BUSINESS: LOCATION AGENT o ZONING: All application shall be made on forms provided by the accompanied by: Director or designee ail Sheet size for plan( and any required drawings shall prefer y be drawn on sheets not to exceed 18 inches by 24 inches; and Th scale of the sign site plan shall be an engineering scale; and All drawings of the sign e1ev :tibnss and structural components shall be a standard architectural scale, being one - fourth inch or one- eighth inch; The required information placed on separatla gulps. (A) Three cooed for review by the Director of the sign plans (e) and any necessary data or narrative which explains how the sign plan proposal conforms to the standards. Fifteen co>eie® for review by the plamlrao Ca`Emi.ssion of the sign plans for sign code exception: No. Copies The Proposed .2A,gan shall include the following information: 1. The location of the proposed sign, and all existing signs on the site; 2. The location of all existing and proposed . buildings on the site; 3. The location of all existing and proposed streets and rights -of -way, including names and widths; and 4. The location of all overhead power and utility lines located the site; 5. The distance of the sign to the nearest public right(:) -of -gray; 6. The address of the site where the sign will be located; and 7. The name, address, and phone number of the . applicant. REQUIRED RECEIVED (C) The proposed shall REQUIRED RE EIVAU including the following information: 1. The sign dimensions; 2. the materials and colors to be used; 3. The height of the sign above the ground, 4 The source and intensity of any illumination; and . Construction drawings indicating size of footings, anchorages and welds. 6. The address of the site where the sign(s) will be located; 7. For those cases where an existing sign is to be modified, the fapplicant shall provide documentation or verifiable Proof of when sign was erected, and wherever possible, shall submit a copy of the original sign Permit; S. Distance of the proposed d fr say- oriented freestanding sign to the freeway interchange off -repo (I)) A list of the names and addresses of all f I persons who are property owners or record within 250 feet of the site., (E) Applicant's statement (No- Copies Z7 ) t:',4 i I (F) Proof of current City business tax certificate. I I f (GI A tax asses - or's map f I I (H) A title transfer instrument ( I (I) The required fee ($ 1 /t` ) I I I I' II. COMMENTS: •ill � /.' ,l�.�i4 V. j r /pre --app. da CITY OFD TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 b. GENERAL INFORMATION ('),_ eI PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION (37b2 �� �� % CASE NO. OTHER ENOs RECEIPT HO. APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE. Application ele®enta eau itted a CA) Application form. (1) e„® (B) Owner's signature /written authorization (C) Title transfer Instrument (1) (ID) c.' ;y PRa3ia©a� (E) Site plan (pre-app checklist) (F) Sign plan (pre -app checklist) (G) Applicant's statement (18 copies) PHONE • ZIP q--icva, *Wien the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or submit a written authorization with this application. . PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request a Sian Code Exception to allow (I) Filing fee )tics DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: COMP. PLAN /ZONE DESIGNATION: )739P17P ° cv' dl . 8 /88 i.t Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering S!gn Permit Number and Date issued ... .•k .r� r; Y a- .Y• ..tt� -x,.. r. l.. .i ..i's b.y,4 3®' ' List any other and use actions to be considered as part of this aPpliceti000 �.9. • Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit: attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. o THE PZI (S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above re vest does not violate an deed restrictions that ma be Ittac ed to or imposed upon the sbiect roperty® • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms nd subject to all the conditions and limitations zif Che approval. . All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any Permit issued based on this application, may be revoked if • it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, includi 4 the . policies and criteria, .end understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this 1 day SIGNATURES of each owner ( °g. husband and wife) of the subject property. ?:...:.1, (KSL:ht /0739P/719 CITY OF ' TIGARD SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION The applicant here =by applies for a permit for the work accompanying plans and specifications. L Ks r- 1371wya COMPANY: SIGN LOCATION ADDRESS: NAME OF BUSINESS: APPLICANT /AGENT The City of Tigard imposes an annual Business Tax which musty bg persons doing business in the City. Do you presently h Tax? indicated or PHONE: PROPOSED SIGN: (Check as many as apply) PERMANENT ( FREESTANDING ) TEMPORARY ( ) WALL ( ) OTHER ( ) BILLBOARD ( ) SIGN DIMENSIONS: TOTAL SIGN AREA (Sep Ft .) : WALL AREA (Sq. Ft.): WALL FACE: HEIGHT (ft)--: _-- PROJECTION FROM WALL: 0 — ILLUMINATION: YES,) NO ( ) TYPE: ADMINISTRATIVE 'EXCEPTION: APPROVED [ ] N/A [ ] AREA [ ] HEIGHT [ ) HOW MUCH_ COMMENTS: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Permit Fee _... _.._. Receipt No: Approved 'By : _ . Date ELECTRICAL PERMIT REQUIRED: YES ( ) NO ( BUILDING PERMIT REQUIRED: YES ( ) NO ( All sign permits must be accompanied by a scale drawing and plot plan. If work authorized under a sign permit has not been completed within ninety days after the issuance of the permit, the permit shall become null and void. I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE RECORDED OWNER OF THE PROPERTY OR AN AGENT AUTHORIZED BY THE OWNER. J. .0„227.)..Q.,a_ niithrvi &es Applicant's Signature FIX 1012-70,4011 otz 7oG2.... Address Tolophone 3722P LEGIBILITY STRIP 4e' ,I L2t. 92t, CS £' LEGIBILITY STRIP • n �Zi44'�'tird�s- �ctr'¢et],bra�yi na�,a�' *x�'t�^`^+.�'FYa ! <..�''��F►k••a t:.