Loading...
Report .. . . ,, FIJI° -6 gPaoo 'D • -,7) Fire Marshal's Division Offices 17— v 1 � ' t I D , OC 14 NW Division South Division East Division i ,{ 14480 SW Jenkins Rd. 7401 SW Washo Court 624 7th Street • - \ ' TY OFTI(,AhO Beaverton, OR 97005 Tualatin, OR 97062 Oregon City, OR 97045 - Tualatin ValleyiLDING DI 503 6 -4700 � Fire. Rescue ( ) (503) 612 -7000 (503) 657 -1365 Fax (503) 644 -2214 Fax (503) 612 -7003 fax (503) 657 -7913 FIRE FLOW and HYDRANT WORKSHEET This worksheet is required to be submitted to and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) before any permits for new building construction, building expansion, or fire hydrants will be issued by any building department within the TVF &R District. Please complete, sign, and date the PREPARER INFORMATION block. Then complete the GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION block. Lastly, complete either item A or B, and items C, D, E and F on page 2 titled CALCULATING REQUIRED FIRE FLOW. Please clearly print all requested information. See the instruction book for help filling out the form or call one of the above numbers. , PREPARER INFORMATION Preparer: i t E dr er Phone: ( 6 - q-S[ c Fax: (593) — 91477 Architect I Engineer of Record: a L .. l c, ✓'(� L(.3 ` Phone: a3 6 :40 -=� Fax: (-___5n- . 6v' 6 7 Preparer Signature: INr► �t�!% Date: Wit 21 GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION 1. Project Name: ,�a, ��jj vf __-- ; � j / dr 2. Project Address: 6e 30 W . I 6 g7Pa3 Cit y : { r County: _ ; ii 311/ - ! Zip: . ' 3. Construction Type(S) ❑ Type I Fire Resistive or Type II Fire Resistive _ ❑ Type II One -hour or Type III One -hour ❑ Type IV Heavy Timber or Type V One -hour 0 Type II Non -rated or Type III Non -rated Type V Non -rated 4. Total Building Area: 6/6 = 44/ Square Feet 5. Total Fire Area: 44 2. t /_ Square Feet 6. Building Fire Flow: GZ5 Gallons per Minute (Table A- III -A -I) 7. Descri t Fire Area: (If m re than one fire area lu in a an 112 X 11 or 1l X 17 drawing indicating the various fire areas) i c e. � � ak-te-5 A--IT Y14 a ice! . 8. Type of Occupancy or Use of Building: 1 THIS LINE IS FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE ONLY FIV2 / / A. CALCULATING REQUIRED FIRE FLOW A. Single Occupancy Hazard (If using item A, DO NOT use item B) Al Building Fire Flow Z2 5 GPM A2 Occupancy Factor I -OD A3 (Multiply line Al by line A2) Required Fire Flow. GPM B. Multiple Occupancy Hazard (If using item B, DO NOT use item A) B1 ....Determine percent of each occupancy hazard in the fire area. • (Occupancy Hazard Class) (Fire Area) (Total Fire Area) (Percent of Fire Area) Light Hazard SF _ SF x 100 = Ordinary Hazard Grp 1 SF _ SF x 100 = Ordinary Hazard Grp 2 SF _ SF x 100 = % Extra Hazard GRP 1 SF _ SF x 100 = _ Extra Hazard GRP 2 SF + SF x 100 = Add all of the percentages in the last column, they must equal 100% %. B2 ....Calculate Fire Flow (Occupany Hazard Class) (Factor) (Fire Area) (Fire Flow) (Bldg Fire Flow) Light Hazard 1.00 x % x GPM = GPM Ordinary Hazard Grp 1 1.20 x % x GPM = GPM Ordinary Hazard Grp 2 1.30 x % x GPM = GPM Extra Hazard Grp 1 1.40 x % x GPM = GPM Extra Hazard Grp 2 1.50 x % x GPM = GPM B3 Required Fire Flow GPM C. Calculate the minimum number of fire hydrants required Required Fire Flow (A3) or (B3) ZZ 'OGPM _ 1500 = !, No. of Hydrants (Minimum 2 Req.) D. Reduction of fire flow (check one box only and then complete the calculation in Section E) D1 ❑ Multiply either line A3 OR line B3 by 75% for a full fire alarm D2 ❑ Multiply either line A3 OR line B3 by 50% for automatic sprinklers D3 ❑ Multiply either line A3 OR line B3 by 25% for central station supervised sprinkler protection E. Required fire flow Fire Flow 2, 2-50 GPM x Reduction CO % = Total Req. Fire Flow 5 GPM* (Line A3 or B3) (Line D1, D2, or D3) Minimum 1500 - Maximum 3000 GPM F. Available Fire Flow to the Building Test Results: GPM Please attach documentation of the flow test that was made. It shall include date, time, location of static/residual and flow hydrants, and the tester's name, phone number and address. 10/12/04 THE 13:35 FAX 503 591 0986 TV'VI) ENGINEERING 002 • TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT , Fv a�.z FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST REPORT /) te,z " `m Lz l `� ' s; ,= Date: / S' Location: I? -41 % : < = Test Made By: (Company & Individual) C-Z/ ter- r 'r= `17- Time: Witness: f L Purpose of Test: (2 mfr : — - #1 #2 #3 #4 Total Flow Hydrant Ports GPM C = Hydrant Coefficient D = Inside Dia. Of Outlet, in. P = Pitot Reading 4; `-) Q = GPM r • • Flow equation: Q = 29.83 C D` (P)'`' ; Use C = 0.9 for hydrant pitot flow gauge See Hydrant Monster data for flow equation. Flow tubes Used? Yes No • Hose Monster Used? Yes No `< No. of ports flowed at a time: Static Pressure - 77;'; psi Residual Pressure __ -_ 1 =- - --- : " _psi Flow at 20 psi Residual Pressure (Calculated) -(i gF Remarks — - / .` / _ Location Map: Show on map which hydrants were flowed and which were used to monitor residual pressure. Label ports #1, #2, etc. Notes: 1. /76 S' ` 'c'' i The mapping, flow, or pressure information contained herein reflects conditions on the date and time of the test. Tualatin Valley Water District makes no representations as to the system's ability to meet specific fire flow requirements. Future system capability may differ from the flows reported herein because of subsequent modifications to the District's system and /or because flow and pressure may vary by time of day and season. 4FHtes!iorm doc .1 a: .0i4/04 T 13: 35 FAX 503 591 0980 TVWD rNGINFERING 41] 003 / /-/(:. 1 • ( ' . .....%"' ' ---.--- _ . , c7) ---.„ I 1 I 1 ‘\, 1 I . i ... , e i \ a) )\ ( ' 1 1 \ / , ! Q_ 1 1 1 ! 1 i I I I i I I I 1 I 0 6 . r I I t j I , __________ _r - r 1 1 ---- I_ I I ! ;OS) r ' 1 1 / \ L.1 / \ \\ i \ ,. t ... .!.._ --' i (1) / i • , ct _ •, i J . , / . --- 0.7 ; r/ / 1 in CO Lii b / , I- S . 1 < r') "") - -isA:-.E-- 0 II / (1CQ\ ) \_____/ ! / r Oa .1 -----1- ./.4.. f Li\ NIA , — ) -,.---_-. ---- -1 -- I 1 1 ,.. ..1 , 1- — --; i I 1 - - ,____. ! i < LL_I i :::-.•' ----- .1,. ------I--ir' 0 C\ ■ I i t•K : r ' ) ,-,c--;--)3, 1 e . . ST L.- -...' . a ' \-.____-/ 1 EN _ _ • --- 1 • _ - I ' 7 ----- T - 1 0 EN ! - 7 - i -------- 1 1 i , I , . , . , 1 1 1 : i J i i —...1 i _ - ---- i i --+ =74._ Al. !!!■ i 1 1 i t ____, i 1 ! o ._ ______ _____T—_ 1 ........_ _________ 1 ----- 1 -± - - - -I ! 1 : „.., • ___ _ i ! --------- 1 ------ i ..._1_ (....0 1 I 1 a i E , W II io 0 1 I . 1 23 i 1 1 i I r 1 I ___=-' --- I I r I C _ 1 - C I I I ,.,-.), _17 ---- z --- 1 7.-- 1 F.---- I I 1 i I I_ _ I cn I — -='-"-. 1 1 1 \---- H 1 .....® 1 -----j .1 - 1 I 1 I 1 1 i Flto bey Form 2a SUMMARY Project 1. Project name � l G2° � sl ''� For building agency use only 4 2 oG�t G� 2. Project address 4 "° S") Building g permit number 3. City / town o •+1 Plan checked by 4. Building area (sf) ,OCg7 Approved by A New construction Notes and comments: El New addition Interior remodel Attached Compliance paths for new or alterations to Compliance path for new or alterations to lighting Forms exterior building envelope. Check only one: systems: Form 3a Form 5a Check boxes to XPrescriptive Path Interior Lighting Power indicated ❑ Form 3b Form 5b attached forms Component Performance Path ❑ Interior Switching and Luminaire Count Compliance path for new or alterations to HVAC Form 5c and plumbing systems: E xterior Lighting ni Form 4a Systems Other (a) I (b) Docu- # of Pages Description of Document ments Enter all supporting calculations. rest reports and catalog cuts. i • Applicant . 1 5. Name of applicant 0 sem � L.6 ,�,� 8 Firm l com j [ Areal c 6 . Re E 9. Telephone number 97 1 7. Signature rO 10. Date 2 — 7 - Form 3a - PRESCRIPTIVE PATH ^ : 4 .. `ate .mss. `t 9 -- a, u. -�,.. '� ., e ..,, .. , � . :t - �r?.,, - . Y. . -. �..,.. r,. �4 Y: s:. . � �`i.,., ,�. -�,� .._. _,.�..M,:�_`. a�"l _ ��, `s �.tz� �; x .,�.a1r `,N„ -„ ?tea f�� -.� _ ;�� � <e� v., � : '' Bu 1. Roof area (sf) 4.0-Q 4. Wall area (sf) Areas 2. Skylight area (sf) ,�, 5. Glazing area (sf) 133° 3. Divide line 2 by line 1. Use this 6. Divide line 5 by line 4. Use this v value for your Actual Percent Skylight value for your Actual Percent Glazing 3 3 f Climate Actual Compliance Criteria A B C D E- F G Zone 1 Values Minimum Single Double Single U -Value Double U -Value U -Value See figure 3a for Glazing Type Glazed Glazed Glazed 0.5 Glazed 0.6 0.5 climate zones. Glazing Maximum SC N/A N/A 0.6 0.5 N/A 0.6 .0.4 0, C (cooled buildings) SC = Shading Maximum Coefficient. Percent Glazing 9% 17 %. 18% 21% 27% 37% 46% ' j'3 ° 1 4 . 0 Rr= Total Wall Minimum Rt 5 5 10 5 10 10 10 Thermal Resistance. The Minimum Rt I sum of the Roof / (without skylight) 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 tD resistance for all Ceiling Minimum Rt of the individual 17 17 - 17 17 17 17 17 components of (up to 3% skylight) the assembly. Slab -on- Minimum R -Value Grade (unheated slab) 4.5' 4.5' 4.5' 4.5' 4.5' 4.5' 4.5' a • 5.8 for heated , slab. Floor Minimum Rt 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 1_5" �I 7. Does design meet target? Enter one of the package letter.(A -G) if all the components meet the criteria. Otherwise try Form 3b. Climate Actual Compliance Criteria 1 A B C D E F G Zone 2 Values l Minimum I Single Double Single U- Valuel Double U -Value U -Value See figure 3a for . Glazing Type j Glazed Glazed Glazed 0.5 Glazed 0.6 0.5 climate zones. I Maximum SC Glazing N/A N/A 0.6 0.5 I N/A 0.6 0.4 SC= Shading i (cooled buildings) I Coefficient. Maximum 5% ! 9% 15% 21% 24% f 29% 1 36% i Percent Glazing RI = Total Thermal Wall i Minimum Rt I 5 5 10 5 10 10 I 10 Resistance. The sum of the Minimum Rt resistance for all of Roof / (without skylight) 16 16 16 16 16 16 I' 16 the individual I components of the Ceiling Minimum Rt om p l u to 3% skylight) 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 P assembly. (up Slab -on- Minimum R -Value I • 8.2 for heated Grade (unheated slab) 5.8' 5.8` 5.8` 5.8' 5.8` 5.8' 5.8' )I slab. Floor Minimum Rt I 13 13 13 13 13 13 I 13 i 8. Does design meet target? Enter one of the package letter (A -G) if all the components meet the criteria. Otherwise try Form 3b. Envelope Slab -on -Grade i Perimeter insulation installed with minimum total distance Floor of 24 inches per the Code. Section 5303(d) Enter the - Manufactured doors and windows are certified and building reference to plans Air Leakage joints are sealed per the Code. Section 5303(e) and specifications Vapor barrier material is rated at one perm or less. and Moisture Control I installed per the the Code, Section 5303(f) • 1 C y��■ son Testing, Main Office Slow Off! Bad Office Carl Testing, Inc. 8430 30 97223 4060 Hudson St . NE 3060 Phonc (5 589 2 Phone: 330.9155 v For 15 0316 8 4 -09 54 For /5031589-1309 F 15411330-9163 Construction Materials Testing & Inspection Special Inspection FINAL SUMMARY LETTER June 30, 2006 T0508412 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 -8199 Attn: Building Department Re: Haines Crossing- Building 2 6830 SW Atlanta Street- Tigard, OR Permit# BUP2004 -00496 Dear Sir or Madam: • This is to certify that in accordance with Section 1704.1.2 of the International Building Code, we have performed special inspection of the following item(s) per our inspection reports only: Reinforced Concrete Installation of Adhesive Anchors All inspections and tests were performed and reported according to the requirements of Project Documents and, to the best of our knowledge, the work was in conformance with the approved plans and specifications, approved change orders and applicable workmanship provisions of the State Building Code and Standards, as well as the structural en ineer's design changes, approvals and verbal instructions. - 7! ._ Our reports pertain to the material tested /inspected only. Information contained herein is not to be reproduced, except in full, without prior authorization from this office. If there are any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectf i submitted, CARLS1 I TESTING, IN . y = : Ja . Hietpas Oa ations Manager J /ks c: Eslinger Builders Inc- Casey Eslinger f l GeoPacille Engineeriog;Inc.` Real -World Geotechnical Solutions Investigation • Design • Construction Support June 30, 2006 Project No. 05 -9197 Malcolm Eslinger Eslinger Builders, Inc. 11575 SW Pacific Hwy, PMB 160 Tigard, OR 97223 Fax 503 - 620 -9475 RE: SOIL AND WALL ENGINEER'S SUMMARY AT CONCLUSION OF EARTHWORK ATLANTA STREET OFFICE BUILDING TIGARD, OREGON References: 1. GeoPacific Engineering, Inc. letter on road improvements overlay, dated March 17, 2006. 2. GeoPacific Engineering, Inc. letter on Keystone wall design - revised, dated August 17, 2004. 3. GeoPacific Engineering, Inc., Geotechnical Review, Atlanta Street Office Building, Tigard, Oregon, dated May 19, 2003 4. GeoPacific Engineering, Inc., Foundation Investigation, Baylor Court Office Building, Tigard, Oregon, dated May 23, 2001. GeoPacific Engineering, Inc. conducted the original subsurface investigation (Reference 4 above), the Keystone wall and Haines road overlay improvements design recommendations, and recently completed on -call testing and construction observation services for the above - referenced commercial office building during the development construction portion of the project. The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of the information generated from our services and to make general conclusions regarding the suitability of the of the earthwork, wall construction, and paving work performed at the stie. GeoPacific Engineering Inc. designed the MSE Keystone wall located on the east (upper) and west (lower) sides of the site . Based on our site observations, we conclude that the retaining walls were generally constructed as designed; with the following exceptions: Based on our site observations during construction, after adequately the subgrade the minimal structural fills beneath the building, parking area base course and for the MSE retaining wall were compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the standard Proctor maximum dry density. Density testing of the leveling course asphalt coucrete and the final overlay indicated compaction results of at least 91 percent of Rice density on the leveling course and 92 percent of Rice density for the final overlay (see attached Summary of Field Asphaltic Concrete Density Tests). 7312 SW Durham Road Tel (503) 598 -8445 Portland, Oregon 97224 Fax (503) 598 -8705 June 30, 2006 GeoPacific Project No. 05 -9197 CLOSING AND LIMITATIONS Our reports pertain to the materials and locations tested /inspected only. This letter should not be construed to relieve or lessen the responsibility of the earthwork contractor or owner for site work, but is provided to meet the minimum required governmental assurance in accordance with local engineering standards of practice. Our services were provided on an as- requested basis. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Sincerely, GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. eit PR ap OREGON 23 14 C L James D. Imbrie, P.E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer Attachments: Summaries of Field density tests, Soil Inspections, and Asphaltic Concrete density tests Cc: John Meier/ Alex Hurley, Fax 503.925.8969 Olsen Bros. Atlanta Street Office Buildings 2 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC.