Loading...
ZOA8-85 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. • t. s N1'a x,'i t:,.,. , o- s'. 4 L.y;}�. :4... .Qu �1:.SY i "!Y ..>., +s.vS! tF T r�.. -• ac •• - F ri. �y� a�tJ� F:}'�``?���.'��..' >;K?.rt,>��-?�a,.,c.....,v��,c �;•1;!>�`;� .1;r,: t".. NPO FEE WAIVERS ZOA 8-85 '• ;'' . ; .�_.. Chapter 18.30& 18.32 �_.,.._.:... -,.z.. }j 1. 4t, . • y•. • • Ei . 1 4 ?3 , , . :.'''''''-''''.'.......'...':. • ... t; a • ,, 1 . ..,_ .F • ..'-. _ e..p.'...,.-w.... ..w ...axa.Fw:,..,.. a- _ i...,,N., .. .,3a.•..., r. ..,t2J ..na ",r._sA,,4 .�, ..,^ ',. ,. , . CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ;, ., AGENDA OF : December j.6, '1985 AGENDA ITEM #1: DATE SIUBM'flTED: December 9 1,985 PREVIOUS ACTION: Public [searing was a' ISSUE/AGENDA T'ITLExx • OA 8b I.iel:d before City Council. on 11/25/85 ' . r"'NP Fre;Wier : PREPARED BY Elizabeth A Newton REQUESTED BY: City/ Council; DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: A (1 I?�''i4'-e CITY ADMINIb FRATOR POLICY ISSUE INFORMATION SUMMARY _ On November 25, 1985 a public hearing was held before the City Council to consider amending the Community Development Code to allow foe waiver for appeals and Land Use applications filed by the NPO' s under certain conditions. Council voted unanimously to direct staff to prepare an ordinance allowing for a fee waiver for applications and appeals filed by the NPO's under certain conditions, The ordinance is attached for, your review. Also ;I:. attached is a copy of the November 25, 1985 minutes. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED "T,: 1.' Modify the attached ordinance prior to adoption Review and adopt the attached ordinance. • SUGGE�TEI:) ACTION • Review and adopt the attachr'd ordinance, (EAN:bs/2ZZ9P) • • • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 85- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION ].8,32.340, 18=30.030 AND ADDING SECTION 18.32.345 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY (ZOA 8-85) : WHEREAS, the City of Tigard finds it necessary to revise its Community Development Code periodically to improve the operation and implementation of the Code; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has reviewed the Community Development Code and has adopted the Name; ',arid WHEREAS, the Ci.tti, of. Tigard Planning Commission held public hearings on the proposed changes on November 5, 1985; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on the proposed charges on November 25, 1985 THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS Section 1 Section 18,30,030 (e)(3) of the Community Development Code to :' include the language underlined below 1 (3) Be accompanied by the required fee except as allowed under Section 18,32 34.5 and Section 2+: Section 18.32..340 (b) of the Community Development Code, shall be } amended to include the language underlined below: (b) The appeal or review application shall be accompanied by required foe }kc2.P as, al..lo.Wgd under �Iect�.r� 45 bolo ._-•• -_ n Section 3 A new Section 1.8 ,33 ,345 shall. be added to the Commr,tni.ty Development Code to road as underlined below4 '3 et on 1.8.31v5 E"ee W�ti��crrvllrawed for Nei.ghboncoUd ()r.c nizations F: U - ees for E_and sc i.appli.cati.o d _ Fees n s an dam)J•i.C:olt io l'1 for appea 1. o r rev i.eul of a land use t9r 12 ._ an NPO if all of the followiriq conditions are met_ -- Ka.). The appeal or land use. application must have been supported _by a majority vote of NPO members at a public meeting where ay quorum of NPO members was present, ORI::ti ANcE NO. 8.5-- Page 1 11 . l ... (la) A copy of the minutes of the NPO meeting where the appeal or land was initiated must be submitted' • with the appeal or Land use application. • �c The appeal or application will be considered i valid� when condti.on '( d iboue ar_ meth and all other filing; • requirements are met. (d1 The NPO chairperson or designated representative shall appear at the next available City Council meeting after the application or appeal is filed. The IttP0 shall work through the Planning Division to schedule the item on a Council agenda. Should the Courieil. deny the NPO request for a fee waiver, the NPO shall submit the required fee within three (3) worki.ng �s of the denia ., The fee shall be filed. by 3.00 P.M. on the third (3rd) day_ • Section 4 In order that the Community Development Code may improve the operation and .implementation of the code and to protect the public health,; safety and welfare, an emergency is hereby declared to exist and this Ordinance shall become effective upon its passage by the Council and approval by the Mayor. • PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of 1985 • i:oreen R, Wilson, Deputy Recorder APPPR0VEI). This day of , 1985 John E. Cook, Mayor (F(AN;hs/2229P} • 0f�I;)INAN E No. 85-- P e:�c, e 2 e T I G A R D CITY : C O U N CI L REGULAR MEETING' MINUTES — NOVEMBER 25, 1985 7:00 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: present: Mayor John Cook Councilors Tom Brian, and Jerry Edwards; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson, Deputy City Recorder. 2. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON—AGENDA ITEMS — No items were added. 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA No one appeared to speak. } 4. PRESENTATION OF KEY TO THE CITY a. Mayor Cook presented a key to the City to Mr. Robert McNatt. Mr. McNatt has submitted his retirement notice and worked in the Public Works department since 1969 5. HISTORIC DISTRICT CLARIFICATION DISCUSSION a, Community Development Director stated that .rigard's Comp Plan has officially be acknowledged with the condition that Tigard review the historic overlay designation. LCDC contends the preservation designation is not adequate. The City has received a grant from LCDC to address this last outstanding condition tied to the acknowledgment process. Tigard's historic sites are: Durham Elementary John F. Tigard House Windmill 121st/Katherine * Joy Theater , Upshaw House/Seven Gables Tigard Grange .` Tigard Street Farmhouse and 1,4indmill Tigard Feed & Seed &t. 4( -- Sites currently with Historic District Designation b. Mr. Dick Mathews, Director of Washington County Museum, 'synopsized the history' of the Tigard area and stressed the value of & preserving what historic sites are available in Tigard. He stated that the museum would counsel developers aa to how to do adaptive uses at the historic sites for profitable improvements , c. Consensus of Council was to send item back to Planning Commission and support Staff' s suggestion to have a Committee review requests with Council retaining the right to call up for formal review if necessary. The Review Committee should be: 1 Councilor; 1 Planning Commission Member; and 1 Planning Staff Member, Page 1 -- COUNCIL MINUTES '-- NOVEMBER 25, 1985 { e 6. PUBLIC HEARING ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA 7-85 PARKING REQUIREMENTS A request by the City of Tigard to review Chapter 18.106 of the Community Development Code to allow gravel parking for 'permanent uses on a Temporary basis a. Public Hearing Opened b. Declarations or Challenges — None C. Community Development Director synopsized the history of the request and ' stated Economic Development Committee recommended 3 years for gravel parking for permanent businesses. Planning Commission unanimously denied the gravel for permanent businesses d, Public Testimony -- No one appeared to speak. e. Staff recommended ordinance to retain current language. f. Public Hearing Clcsed g. After lengthy discussion, Councilor Brian moved to direct staff to prepare an ordinance to allow gravel parking for temporary use applications, with approval of the gravel request being granted by the approval authority for the length of` temporary use being requested. The burden of proof for the need for gravel Parking is the applicant's. Motion seconded by Councilor Edwards, Approved by unanimous vote of Council present: 7. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE ORDINANCE`AMENDMENT ZOA 8-85 NPO FEE WAIVER A request by the City of Tigard to modify Chapter 18.32 of the Community Development Code to allow the NPO a waiver of application fees for appeals of land use decisions, amendments to the Community Development Code and amendments to the Comprehensive Plan maps under certain conditions. a. Public Hearing Opened b. Declarations or Challenges — None. c Community Development Director synopsized the request noting that Council initiated the request. Planning Commission voted to deny the request, and CCI voted to approve with condition #3 eliminated. d. Public Testimony: No one appeared to speak. e. Community. Development Director recommended approval with conditions 1-2 and 4-5 being adopted , ..j 1, The appeal or land use application must have been supported . by a majority vote of NPO members at a public meeting where a quorum of NPO members was present, 2.. A copy of the minutes of the NPO meeting where the appeal of land use application was initiated must be submitted with the appeal or land use application. Page 2 — COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 25, 1985 ` ...r ...«:._... ,';ire...µ. ' w 1..• ,- tr l ._ 3. The NPO requesting the fee waiver shall make a presentation to the CCI which includes a justification as to how the NPO is proposal will benefit the City has a whole. The CCI shall then take a vote to support or not support the NPO request. f.:' f 4, The appeal to application will be considered valid when i., conditions 1 and 2 above are met and all other filing r , : :: requirements are met. c i; 5 Should the Council deny the NPO request for a tee waiver, (; the NPO shall submit the required fee within three (3) working days of the denial. The fee shall be filed by 3:00 ?', • P.M. on the third (3rd) day. 1' f. Public Hearing Closed i` 9. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to !.: , approve staff' s recommendation and direct staff to prepare an ordinance for `adoption. t Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. is r 8, PUBLIC HEARING PORTLAND FIXTURE/S & 3 APPEAL CPA 3-85 FULL EVIDENTIAL 1 HEARING NPO #7 A request by the City of Tigard City Council for a re—hearing on an ,• application filed by Portland Fixture to amend the Comprehensive Phan ,. . and Zoning Designation from CP (Commercial Professional) to CG i' (Commercial' General) for a 7.9 acre site located on the south side of f w Scholls Ferry Road, west of Greenway Town Center (WCTM 1S1 34BC, Lot 400) NOTE: Public Testimony Time Limit -- Proponents 20 minutes, Opponents 20 minutes, Cross Examination 10 minutes, Council Questions 10 minutes. a. Public Hearing Continued from 10/28/85 a b. Declarations or Challenges -. Councilor Brian disclosed an ex-parte contact with Mr. Johnson. Mr. Johnson was advised that Councilor x, : Brian would make this disclosure. Councilor Brian stated he was r; not biased and would be voting on the issue. 1, c, Community Development Director noted the history of the request 1 noting that the Council' s original denial was appealed to LUBA, ';` This is back before Council for a full—evidential hearing to k; review the application based on relevant evaluation criteria. The f. criteria set out by staff to be addressed are as follows: 1. Statewide Planning lannin Goals and Guidelines f 2, Tigard Comprehensive Plan I a. Policies 2.1, 1, 5, 1. 1, 5. 1.4, 8. 1.3, and 12.2.1 a. . ., b.' Locaton pertaining Criteria, Section 12. 1 ertaxnin g to General Commercial and Commercial Professional 3 , Tigard Community Development Code . a. 18.22.020 Purpose (Amendments to the Code and Map) 1. b, 18,22.040 Quasi—Judicial Amendments and Standards i for Makin g the Decision c. 18,30 120 Standards for the Decision d. 18,62.010 Purpose (C—G Zone) e, 18 ,64.010 Purpose (C-P Zone) t. Page 3 — COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 25,, 1985 - • k , • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY 2' ` AGENDA OF: November 25, 1985 AGENDA ITEM J C \..)DATE SUBMITTED': November 20, 1985 PREVIOUS ACTION: ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE; NPO Fee Waiver ZO'A, 8'..:8S ,�' � PREPARED BY Elizabeth Newton . :.,. . REQUESTED BY: Planning Staff 4: DEPARTMENT HEAD OK: .[ C 3' t 1/r ) CITY ADMINISTRATOR i POLICY ISSUE • Should the City Council amend the Community Development Code to set forth a ' process to allow a fee waiver for appeals and Land Use applications for NPOs. INFORMATION SUMMARY : .' _,' Attached is a memo which outlines the staff's recommendations and •4 recommendations from the Planning Commission, NPO # 4, and the CCI. l; '` ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Support the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial. 2. Support the NPO #t 4 and CCI recommendation for approval subject to conditions 1 and 2. 3. Support the Planning Staff's most recent proposal 4. Retain the existing policy. SUGGESTED ACTION ', Review the recommendations of staff, the Planning Commission, NPO # 4, and the . f CCI; after discussion direct staff to prepare an ordinance to amend the Code or retain the existing policy 2062Pldm t j i r • Y MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON 1 TO: City Council November 2O 1985 , . FROM: Elizabeth Newton, Senior Planner .. SUBJECT: Fee Waivers for NPO's Since the adoption of the Community Development Code in November 1983, various Neighborhood Planning Organizations have filed appeals on land use decisions made by the city and also filed land use appl;=eations for changes ' 'to the Community Development Code and the zoning and comprehensive land use maps. Most recently, NPO # 1 filed a request for a fee waiver for an application to j.` review the Comprehensive Plan Policy related to the extension of Ash Avenue. Under the current code, the NPO is required to pay any and all required filing r' _ fees at the time the appeal or application is filed. The NPO has then had to ,, request a refund from the City Council in order to recover the costs of filing :. the appeal or application. Since November of 1983, the City Council has �•: _, approved nearly all of the NPO refund requests, STAFF RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that Chapter 18,30 and Chapter 18.32' of the Community Development Code be amended to allow a waiver of fees For the PO's, subject to the following conditions: ,' 1. The appeal or land use application must have been supported by a majority vote of NPO members at a public meeting where a quorum of NPO members was present. ,'';,. 2. A copy of the minutes of the NPO meeting where the appeal or land use application was initiated must be submitted with the appeal or land use application. 34 The NPO r questing t e fee wai.v shall. ma e a pres taboo to the CCI which i cludes a j stification as to how he NPO oposal w` benef' j the C` y as a wh e. The C shall. th take a ote to su port or of { supp rt the NPO eque st. 1A „f4 4. The appeal or application will be considered valid when conditions 1 and 2 above are met and all other filing requirements are met. i 5 Should the Council deny the NPO request for a fee waiver, the NPO shall submit the required fee within three (3) working days of the denial. The fee shall be filed by 3:00 P.M. on the third (3rd) day, b - ti;{ • �rl. The Planning Commission reviewed the staff's recommendation limited to conditions 1 and 2 at their November 5, 1985, meeting. The Commission voted ±, '• 5-3 to recommend to City Council that the proposal be denied, A copy of the ';''• minutes is attached. On November 6, 1985, NPO # 4 reviewed staff's recommendation limited to ,: conditions 1 and 2.. The NPO members voted unanimously to support staff's recommendation. A copy of the minutes of the meeting is attached. • On November 19, 1985, the staff presented a recommendation to the CCI, )}' • including conditions 1, 2, and 3. The four members present supported staff's 1, recommendation without condition 3. They felt that condition 3 was unnecessary • STAFF CONCLUSION • The City Council should review staff's latest proposal and the recommendations I '' forwarded to Council by the Planning Commission, NPO # 4, and CCI. After discussion Council should direct staff to amend the Code or retain the existing policy. • 2062P/dmj • • • • • • • ii f _ 4t C h ea vYe4'wXrP ,. TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 5,, 1985 1. President Moen called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. . The meeting was held at Fowler Junior High School, 10865 SW Walnut LGI Room. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: President Moen; Commissioners Butler, Peterson, Bergmann, Eyre, Vanderwood, Owens, and Leverett. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Bergmann moved and Commissioner Owens seconded to approve the minutes as submitted. Motion carried by majority vote of Commissioners Present. Commissioners Fyre and Vanderwood abstaining. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION' COMMUNICATION Final Order for Tigard Arco - SCE 3-85 -- Commissioner Bergmann moved and Commissioner Owens seconded to authorize President Moen to `sign the final order. Motion carried by majority vote. Commissioners Fyre and Vanderwood abstained. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1 SUBDIVISION S 12-85 BENJ. FRAN. DEVELOPMENT, INC. NPO # 7 Request to subdivide a 8.5 acre portion of a 38.96 acre parcel into 36 lots ranging between 7,500 and 10,000 square feet in size. Located: South of Falcon Rise Drive and east of Morning Hill Dr. (WCTM 2S1. 4A, lot 501) . . , Senior Planner Liden made staff's recommendation for approval with 11 x conditions. Noting condition number 8 to change Aberdeen to Katherine St. .. and Condition 10 which would require a sensitive lands permit before grading or filling on slopes which exceed 25 percent. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Norman Harker, 1750 SW Skyline Blvd, Portland, Oregon, Alpha Engineering, representing Benj . Fran. Inc. , agreed with the staff report and was available for questions PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED { o Commissioner Owens questioned how Morning Hill and Chimney Ridge would connect. Staff reviewed o Commissioner Bulter asked if 135th was the only access. Staff stated there where two accesses, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 5, 1985, - Page PUBLIC HEARING' CLOSED - o Commissioner Leverett favored the proposal. O Commissioners Bergmann, Vanderwood, Fyre, Owens, Peterson, Butler, and Moen opposed the proposal O Commissioner Owens stated that this proposal would result in many problems in the future. It would be as difficult to administer and enforce as the sign code ordinance is now. * Commissioner Moen moved and Commissioner Owens seconded to forward ZOA 7-85 to City Council with a recommendation for denial, requesting that staff include a copy of the minutes from the previous meeting which they had stated their objection to allowing graveled parking areas. Motion carried unanimously by Commissioners present. 5.4 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA_8-85 NPO FEE WAIVER Request by, the City of Tigard to modify Chapter 18.32 of the Community' Development Code to allow the NPO a waiver of application fees for appeals .° of land use decisions, amendments to the Community Development Code and amendments to the Comprehensive Plan map under certain conditions. Senior Planner Liden reviewed staff' s proposal. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Commissioner Butler and Owens questioned why this was being brought up as ': they both understood that waiver of fees for NPOs already existed in the :.# Code o Lengthy discussion followed. there was concern that the proposal could be E easily abused. They felt the present system was working adequately at this time, Commissioner Owens felt this issue should be addressed at a later date. o Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to forward ZOA 8-8S to City Council with recommendation of denial. Motion carried by majority of Commissioners present. Commissioners Sutler,' Moen, and Vanderwood voting no. 5.5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENOMENT CPA 14-85 ZONE ORDINANCE ZOA 6-85 HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGNATION Request by the City of Tigard to review Chapter 18.82 (Historic District Overlay) — of the Community Development Code and review of ESEE section of Volume I Resource Document of the adopted Comprehensive Plan which relate ,. to Historic Sites within the City of Tigard Urban Planning Area. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 5, 1985 Page 3 ' ^:s^4.."f�.'d.:i•+.Y.C=N'.9." +.,,.«,, «•..a:`i'.'s•�p¢a.,aae+w?vr.-+cror:s�,p 1•' ' h • . . •,. - - fir. . , • 6j/6 MINUTES OF NPO #4 MEETING NOV 4BER 6, 1985 .._ is Geraldine Ba 11, ChairpereO* NP® #4 Me�ber® Present: : LaVa11e. Alles•, Lou Qhr st.ea, _. Iry Larson, Louise St art Guest- Larson Meeting was called to order by Chairperson: Ba11 7:35 P.M. �- g approved. . Mi;te�te® of the =Septeffiber 4, 1985 m®etia mere app ,.'. Re CPA. 14®85 & ZOA 6-85. HISTORIC DISTRICT: :. LaValle, Allea .moved that NPO #4 expreze their fee1ie,gs that I8CDC "is ithposixg unfair: COlidi.tiOlfLE OR the City of ., Tigard,` citizen's and affected property ot.tnetrs who objected to be imo1udaad". Louise Stewart secoTded the aoti(e)a which was passed u*+aiToUs 1y Re ZOA. 7-85, - PARKING REGULATIONS: the Staff reoom�ead.at .� LaVa11® Allea moved that PO #4 with s scif o. equiremeats that gravel parking areas be for : p Lou Christen seooaded the, ao�►ioa which was,:passed UaamimOasl r 'Re ZOAf 8-.85 ®- NPO PEE WAIVE: f c rr at Iry Lareo�a� coved that NPO #4 go along with the, Staff ecoaaezdatioa that PQ fees be wa .vered,.. LaYall■e Allen seconded the. motion which• was. gassed: uaa i�eoa shy. SPBR'STATION.••DISCUSSION t ,r1,4Tiltilit Allen moved that NPO-..#4 oppose traaefer station: thin, Tigard. City limits beoaaee of. the small ou t of i�dustria land,because® of the traffic problems it Wo ad . a. Irlf hs� om, Secozadfid .tsa * iaoa �eas�rat� at�al. ®ths� �a�o�csra®��f _s +whteli..easy paesmd- auitousiy. ' The meat ,meetimg of the #4 will be Viedmesday December 4t 11985 7:30 P AM e • Tigard City, as 1. _ �,.,4, , The 1baiag .ao further .b ssiiO®e�g the meeting ad j owed P Y �� awe- ' t a.r1erroeor�a9o®� - �'F mg a Y ar802,9 isms aa�far , ' '....ate. '. ,ar . , ..a:e .,. ; e: ,l.•,: - perso, • ,i 9 My rf,.}. K +'k. `r J If r 9 *I-.:w.mn+•Y-}.-rr+•;. C�Y u aF•„ -1°,y '^4" ,.� a'r`9•'-.,. ^k'�"61F t1 N'll �+'}- ; �3 • • ♦•Mi ..!-..•/Yti r .T M1 Y f .....k..-_• • .»...,.. .r..e..(-_ .» a.x.. »x... _ .:V.. }. UX..i u_1:.d 4 .:,4-.t's.:,..1.Y.'.. .....:stiYin++'G•a^ -#" MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Planning Commission October 29, 1985 FROM: Elizabeth Newton, Senior Planner iL/Z SUBJECT: Fee Waivers for NPO's Since the adoption of the Community Development Code in November 1983 various. Neighborhood Planning Organizations have filed appeals on land use decisions made by the city and also filed land use applications for changes to the Community Development Code and the zoning and comprehensive land use maps. Under the current code, the NPO is required to pay any and all required filing fees at the time the appeal or application is filed. The NPO has then had to request a refund from the City Council in order to recover the costs of filing •.1 the appeal or application. Since November of 1983, the City Council has ; approved nearly all of the NPO refund requests. E Lr STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Chapter 18.30 and Chapter 18.32 of the Community Development Code be ' amended to allow a waiver of fees for the NPO' s, subject F to the following conditions., 1. The appeal or land use application must have been supported by a majority vote of NPO members at a public meeting where a quorum of NPO members was present. 2, A copy of the minutes of the NPO meeting where the appeal or land use } application was initiated must be submitted with the appeal or land use ,p application. (EAN:pm/2062P) . .._ .,,r-.,...,-...w•..w-.,...<•-waww,:+w ... n _..2:°".J3;J`.7�`S.x"y'�:.'c's3-"M.v.�'ro'• " aK Ofiitti .