Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ZOA5-86
POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. 3 • ate: E st & Barbara Mar ZOO 5=85 <: • Amend P` to allay a Lti L. as r' .-,_u+e.;kA,€:=�s•A#•G�.k.=: :."..'.',x-?";'.R4..7y.fir ...,..;mv:=+kz� .', 14,...4#4,-,..4 xw.x .40,,n -• .,+..+yaw«,Kaw.i,...............,,..5....v»:w„..m„..♦F+Y'.w......a.m,e...a.,w.nuc..e.. _ .n_ . .•' — " , a �sy . ,} • a- ......,..,..,,.1,,,....:.',..is.. '.. • • 4 3 t 0 a a l a. .L '' ii Ele-t#1.( 6, it4 . . . ,- CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON -. NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION - BY CITY COUNCIL (Sec. 18.32°380) 1. Concerning Case Number(s): ZOA 5-86 2. Name of Saner: Ernest and Barbara Mares 3. Name of Applicant: Same .s Address 13627 Sunset Blvd. pacific Palisades , CltY ae i Zip 90272 4. Location of Property. Address Same Legal Description N/A 5. Nature of Application: To allow u• -, ,^. Y� s fraternal aril civic assembly; general. r dise such as furniture and lar:e a Iiances. • •-: -.0_ _ •enexal, as permitted uses ix, the I-P I d k) o 1 i 6. Action: • • The Tigard City Council heard the above-mentioned request on September 8, 1986; the motion of the Council was to deny this request. The Council, . .� on October 13, 1986, ratified that action by adopting Resolution No. 86-117a Attached is a copy of Resolution No 86-117 for your information. 4` J 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to XXX The applicant & owners XXX Owners of record within the required distance a' XXX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XXX Affected governmental agencies R; 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION WAS SIGNED OH 10/13/86 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE O81 iQ/13186 OG p. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of condition can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. , P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. MD A review of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent, CD with the Oregon. Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) according to their .J procedures. 9. Questions: If you have any questions, please call, the Tigard City Recorder at 639-4171. (0257P) .q- ' - . (10 '' '''''' t f x :�d N • _ •6 .., .,-,.•w•••••• .-.•.....,m._°.......�...r..._r , .-- i=e..S�A.•.;.-CCi. ••••5_' xlx> .,.....�.... ,.=.:.-a- �. 4 ,i , an l ik a of r��or',IncJR ors • . 111 S.W.Fifth Avenue r. Portland,OR 97204 ' (5O34 221-1700 Meter fi • ''4 ,� a • t}Charles D.Ct s btoly Of Mdwtral Ree;zs Senior ice President a p a o.• + 1.. • tl • • • • • 1 • 4 • • • .1:':: ,' , ' „., , * ' `,..,,,s +:1., ,':ti:',,' ,,',.'"`Ir.';„..'0,:^.'1',':''.':''...',''...''''''':l q flt` r.a Y: 1 .'' ! � r . • ..;..;, rx ►r.<, ,r.u . .. 1.4 , •g' .o isr, K !he,:iztw.} :k{}�:.3ac•�4t.s.1� CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO 86— J/`7 ' A FINAL ORDER It'd THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FORA ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT x (ZOA 5-86) REQUESTED BY ERNEST AND BARBARA MARX, DENYING THE APPLICATION, ENTERING FINDINGS AND CQNCLUSIOIJS. WHEREAS, the applicants requested a Zone Ordinance Amendm(trnt to Title 18 of the Tigard Municipal, Code to allow public agency adrinistraat.itae services; 3 lodge fraternal and civic assanbly general retail sales (limited to bulky merchandise); and personal services as permitted uses in the I—P (Industrial ~, Park) zone. ;.; WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission_ heard the above application at its regular meeting of August 19, 1986, and recommended denial; WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council heard the above application at its regular meeting of September 8, 1986. No one appeared to testify regarding this par•oposal.' *' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT,RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: . Section 1: The proposal is not consistent with all relevant criteria as ,.. discussed in the April 8, 1906, Planning etaff report to Planning Commission (Exhibit 'IA") Section 2 The City Council upholds the Planning Cc anission recommendation , for denials of the Zone Ordinance Amendment as set forth in Exhibit ' S91 Section 3: The Council, therefore, ORDERS that the above r eferenced request be, and the same hereby is DENIED. The Council FURTHER ORDERS ` . that the Planning Director and the City Recorder send a copy of the Final Order as a Notice of Final Decision to the parties in • this case a. PASSED. This ' day of �a r 1986 d- City of Tigard 3. • 2.4 AI EST a) p 0 ctirag City Recorder -- City of Tigard dj/193 • • RESOLUTION NO 86- Page 1 y. f` d. r. �.. •,f,. ,=L a. � ` .4 t '� e A. Bn i F la .a 4 r ±, y e , 7... , •.e u •i • v+,w ..,....ss,>..a ..r..; 's :. : r..: ,•,x.. s.s rki41Y ly t44 ft:t) 9r`�1.1) 2 17.2E •++'.,•�,�♦ t�i�,tt;ttir�etti it.ltkik'»t9ui?S'<>i r2)•>. )ti1>}l Ci:l.s.1t,{i�t.t0% t2#tt • i a A r :. AGENDA ITEM 5.3 PLANNII'VG COMI4ISSION '. •. August 19, 1905 MEMO • ales,total. • ` To Planning Commission :-... • . .F FRt11: Keith 11.. dera Senior Planner RE: ZOA 5-86 for Ernest and Barbara Marx -' A. FACTS 1. pereral Information CASE:: Zone Ordinance Amendment ZOA 5.86 •:�.. REQUEST: To allow public agency administrative services; lodge, fraternal . and civic assembly; general retail sales (limited to bulky . merchandise such as furniture and large appliances); and Personal services, general as • :`- p permitted us®s in the Z--R - �.�• (Industrial Park) zone. APPILICANT: Ernest And Barbara Marx 13627 Sunset Blvd , .... Pacific Palisades, CA 90272 :. 2. k round The I--P (Industrial Park) zone was adopted by the City in November, 1983. One amendment of this zone occurred in 1985, . resulting in the list of : permitted and conditional uses contained. in the applicant's narrative. 3. fro a ®es „tion -x Ot The applicant is proposing that several additional uses be allowed in the I-P zone. The contention is that these use are consistent with the intent of the zone and compatible with or similar to other allowed. Uses. Listed below are the proposed uses to be added, the Community Development Code definitions, and the zones in which these use are pret!ently allowed, a ED Public Administrative Agency . Refers to' public service providers, record keeping, clerical, OP public contact services that deal directly with the either together° • with incidental storage rand maintenance of necessary vehicles, and ,:•, -; excludes commercial use type,N�M"Profession l and • Admirsistrative Services." T ical use t yP types ar"e associated with ; .gover'nmeratal • • offices. (Permitted C-x'f, C--C, C-P and. CB0 zones.) ZOA 5-86 (Earnest & Barbara Marx) Page 1 h . ,.,..:,. ... ... ..,..'.. ,. ..:.,'SW x+r;++ti+,e A, .42Cel •..r...,, .+.l.00 44 40 0 143.#s#iY1#444.10441 144+:.44?M:NI:.1+11 4004 0,!i$y+a.444 4,04 4:t.++t11:+t�tlii.hl5!#Ttsih:+SVi4�)ih4+rk+af.t,��.i.1�.k1,#+dti.1. Lodge, Fraternal, and Civic Assembly Refers to meetings and activities primarily conducted for the members of a particular group, Excluded' from this use type are uses classified as group residential, group care, and transient lodging + (all types). Typical uses include meeting places for civic clubs, k. lodges, or fraternal or veterans organizations. 4' (Permitted C--C, C:P, COD zones, conditional R-12, R-26, R-40, and zones.) General Retail Sales ::. Refers to the sale or rental of commonly used goods, and merchandise for personal or household use, but excludes those classified as Agricultural Sales, Animal Sales and Services, Automotive and Equipment, Business Equipment Sales and Services, Construction Sales and Services Food and Beverage Retail Sales, and Vehicle Fuel Sales. Typical uses include department stores, apparel stores, furniture stores, pet stores, or book stores. (Permitted C-G, CBD zones, permitted with 20% limit on total floor area of a project C-P and I-P zones.) Personal Services Facilities Refers to the establishments primarily engaged in the provision of informational, instructional, personal improvement, and similar services of nonprofessional nature but excludes services classified under Spectator Sports and Entertainment Facilities, Participant Sports and Recreation, or Tra4nsient Lodging. typical uses include photography studios, driving schools and trade schools or reducing -P salons. (Permitted C-G, C-P, CBD zones, permitted with 20% limit on total floor, area of a project. I-P zone.) 4. .lq,ency & NPO CQa nents The Engineering and Building Inspection Division have no objection to the request. NPO 0 1 and 4 have recommended against the proposal. No other comments have been received. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS e Section 10.30.120 of the Community Development Code states that ordinance amendments shall be consistent with Statewide Planning Goals, federal and state statutes, applicable plans adopted by Metro, applicable Comprehensive Plan policies, and relevant ordinances. No Plan policies apply directly to this application and none of the other .items mentioned' above would be in conflict with this request. The purpose statement for the I-P zone and a comparison with the"other uses presently allowed in the zone provide the most suitable guidance for reviewing this proposal. The relevant purpose statements in Section 10.68.010 (a) of the Code are subsections (1), (2), and (4) which are stated below: ZOA 5-86 (Earnest £ Barbara mare) - Page 2 1 a 4 , r s,te ♦•:.,. .. Gafa r.r:tc+cr) .,5. 'tY.Ss::!:.t.r.f r}J..tc7a t.a:1aA;.art-.:>uxtra':s .s:. s, .,...:a. 4.i.�ii...t....r:ttal'i...t`a rxt..,ii:r • • • • (1) For combining light manufacturing, office and complementary related commercial use e.g., restaurant, barber shop, beauty salons and fitness centers; (2) For combining uses which have no off—site impacts in terms of noise, odor, glare, lights, vibration, smoke, dust, or other types of - : off:site impacts (4) Which .'. .: ( prohibit residential ..uses. .. `.. Public Agency Administrative Services are consistent with the above purpose statements and this use is similar to other categories permitted in the I- P zone such as financial, insurance and real estate services; professional and administration services; and research. services. Public agencies and utility companies would be well suited for the I--P zone, i ... y equipment g ry. r, particularly when vehicle and a ui �errt store a is necessary. :.. Lodge, fraternal, and civic assembly meets the above purpose statements and it should be noted that this is not a residential use. there are no ., ° similar uses presently allowed in the I—P zone. :` : General retail for bulky merchandise is presently permitted in the I—P zone if it does not exceed 20% of the total square foot of a development. ::. The sale of bulky merchandise involves more extensive storage requirements '= than other commercial retail establishments. Also, the traffic generation of these uses is less than most retail uses as reflected by the parking requirement in the Code for one space for every 1,000 square feet of floor area. i. . The Planning staff does not object to the presence of bulky merchandise y a sales in the I—P zone, however, clear criteria should be formulated to °°. strictly limit this use to bulky merchandise only and to avoid the establishment of businesses which sell a variety of large and small . :. merchandise. Personal services, general are presently allowed on a similar basis as general retail sales. This category is consistent with the purpose , , statement for the I—P zone and the use appears to be compatible with the , intent of the zone. Since the present vocational training center located on the property owned by the applicant occupies more than 20% of the total O. se nc floor area, it is considered as a non—conforming use. . p. GI C. RECOMMENDATION The Planning staff recommends approval of the above proposal to allow public agency administrative services; lodge, fraternal, and civic N assembly; and personal services, general as permitted uses in the I-P zone. The sale of bulky merchandise is also appears appropriate, provided .. that clear definitions and/or criteria aee, established to prohibit variety stores which are only partially devoted to the sale of such merchandise. The staff will be prepared at the hearing to discuss possible methods for enforcement of this distinction between the two types' of general retail y sales. dj/119 ZOA 5-86 (Earnest £, Barbara Marx) - Page 3 .:, .L..x'r!M.l'Yl\i..fe..•r k. ...y •\..'Mfi..!1.M•Ylir li It 3Y.\.air^.RY.ti3r• e n . ..... rn 4♦9Li.A.Ni♦,'4.i..ti\ . •'.. )i•L• K . - flO 0 ' ;- �. w . . \.r.e...r....Y..\\ >.. aer.3F.t, a.sr.0 a,.).rr.,73t . r a i'...nY.4.''. W\•'n„\,}�Yuri\'”f,{yi.l./.r:i.`b.'nif..%:1LhriWi..11SF y+'M s.roe:.is>.a. } 5.2 SUBDIVISION S"14-0.6, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT ti 6-96, VARIANCE V 13-66 NPO H 3 f` ALBERT AND VIRIGNIA`\ I .REK NPO H 3 } This itam will be readverti.s "tuft 4earileggii8rr'111.g-— ..,-.:- ' ekf giar.ang /alter in the year.. '' `RECESS - �.. , r Bs45 PM l.N rf.•♦ Vii., .-. RECONVENE B.55 PM 5.3 ;ZONE'ORDIANCE AMENDMENT' 'ZO '.5-36- r ERNES' 'A%D BARBARA i' RX' (trri..E' AB) •; A' request for a Zone Ordinance Amc?ndment to Title 1e of the Tigard Municipal Code to allow prblic agency administration services, lodge, _ ' fratenal and civic assembly, general retail sales :(limited to bulky . merchandise such as furniture and large appli,ances), and personal services as permitted in the IP (Industrial Park) zone. 0 Commissioner Newman stated that he would not participate as a Commissioner En this hearing as his wife is one of the tenants on the property and he could be testifying as an individual. `' �" Senior Planner Liden reviewed the proposal. Lengthy discussion followed .' regarding changes being proposed. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION q ,: , o Chuck Cota, Cushman & Wakefield, 111 SW 5th Ave. Suite 2400, Portland, OR ,':' 97204 representing the applicant. Explained this request waas the result . of property located on SW Cascade Blvd. next to Power Rents. He explained °'^ that his client will be upgrading the property and would like the flexibility to, lease to uses that are being permitted in the area, such as Levitz. He questioned whether Power Rents was being catagorized appropriately. They had originally wanted to do a Zone Change on the s'?;} property, but staff had discouraged them and suggested they request a ' modification to the IP zone permitted uses. He stated that the parking requirements for bulky funiture are the same as for other warehouse uses '. and would be appropriate for what is in the area now. PUBLIC TESTIM0NY .1 a o Geraldine Ball NPO 0 4 Chairperson, stated that their NPO felt that the e•' property should have a zone change rather than changing the IP zone city • wide. CC ee e Will Newman, 10065 SW Riverwood Lane, stated that his wife is the Director GO of the School which occupies half the facility in question. He .did not $.:: support the proposed change. He did not feel the site. had adequate . parking as is and felt the request was more for :a CG zone than a IP zone. ` am He. also opposed changing the zoning on the property to CG. r ; cm ee REBUTTAL o Chuck Cote, explained that their preference would be for .a comprehensive plan and zone change, however staff would not support that proposal.., He L '. stated that the site has 60 parking._ spaces, which is adequate "'fear' the existing use He continued that because of the change of uses in the area :.. . .' they uou ld like the ability to lease to a wider market. • :ptfititittrikid.'oeiiiiiittfolv.141111111Te$'= ' 1 T 19, 1986. PAGE 3 , • • • . 0 Discussion followed regarding staff's position on the comprehensive Plan and zone change. Staff felt the entire area should be evaluated rather than changing the zoning on this one piece of'proparty. t PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED •, 0 Consensus of the Commission was that it would not be appropriate to change 0 the IP zone uses for the entire City. It would be more appropriate to evaulate the entire area`to see if a C—G designation should be assigned to the area, # Commissioner •Fyre moved rand Commissioner Vander rood seconded to forward ZOA 5-86 to City Council with a recommendation for denial. Motion carried by majority vote of Commissioners present. Commissioner Newman abstained. RECESS 9:32 PM RECONVENE 9:45 PP1 ' 5.4 SIGN CODE EXCEPTION SCE 9-86 CROW/SPEIKER/HOSFORD NPO # 5 Request for a Sign Code Exception to allow for the expansion of one free standing sign and the ability to modify a second sign of three free standing "signs which previously received Sign Exception approval (SCE 1-55) on property zoned C (Commercial General). Located: SW Garden Place (WCTM 2S44, 188 lot 400, 1400, and 1600). Senior Planner Liden reviewed the previous approval and explained that this 'proposal would ;&ncr°eaase the size of the sign on Hall Blvd. to the same size as the onion SW Pacific Highway. Also, they would like the • ability to add a reader board to the sign located on Highway 217, if necessary. `•, APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Randy Mawhirter, 9350 SW Tigard, ' us inite Sign, explained that his client Peop.1e finding their location. He stated was still having difficulty with that the message sign for 217 is somethii i the are anticipating,,�g . y p ng, 'however, it may not happen. They would not be in•. ,es ing the size of the sign on Highway 217 if they decide to make this cha�; . . o Discussion followed regarding location and what a:;.a signs would look like. :kF PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak• PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o The majority of the Commissioners supported the proposal. Cetemissioner Newman was concerned that the reader board sign location on Hi§hway' 217 { would cause a visual distraction as it is located where the traffic� verges onto 217 from Pacific Highway: `' .,. Commission-r Tyre moved and CommisSianer Venderwood seconded to aapproVO the SCE 9-86 as submitted. . Motion. . carried by majority vote of'' Commissioners present. 'Commissioner Newman voting no PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 19, 1986 - PAGE 4 : .; .'; ,��yf+ >'+'...'+" r':".n. ; r3: J}^ k4�3vr � �.. Y �+ h�. t 'f 'k'`.:: --:''''.'s-,.'.-:'''.',..,; •r s+ �: .`.NUr. .•-.,. ..,. Y,..,h- • ,.0.e—.', ' � ! p.:'.A :yi F { F 4 R C 1 'C. ° 4 J 3 7. �" �k." 'i •- n ,� '130q5...,-,SW �aew Terrace w. ■• t" ., ig rOR ;97224 �' ';f -•tom *a+ .I.� t ex±"x• + '"�` i .f,,. '- tY* 1 r fk bra'' n• �L1S�1'�EY � '�� e � - , .W - f d'g 1 'Sid'•5th :Avenue ,'Sul,-te 2400 2t14 • Pur l�-'d, CSR 9 a t ine Ball x �`{ - Y • , .- oe�cald 11'5 15 SST .91st "--Alven � §: a. e .f 8.'9.7225 r z _ yy••��a�p pry*Qp�-���y(�}}yyyp.yy l.:. d Lane' 1' t' -••T gaud,:OR:97223 s r Y f o,. I.. a . v E ST 4P- ARBA E rT 1AR 6L- & i 1362 SSE B fb' PACIFIC'.PALISADES o 4 90272 ,r .i Y J s. ,.•.. :-1 ) r <��t" sad, i e , x Fp 'i•Y+t 3 �•...::::::'-':-..--.'-'`...'' ''• '''''.'''':'''-'.-'"•''''''•'"':'-':‘: . .. .' :'''. '.. '' ,'' ''. ' ,'' ' .'' :".:- -,:;,--"-'7'.."•::':..-1' ...*''" '',.,:''' '' ., ••.':• '',"'. '•' -'•''T ' y: ' r � +7ri t " t t x♦ea.LC.ef:tr ? : 1 E F°e N.• - .. , ', , c..-'+ . , < f :<•.I;l,+•eJ'.C., F- f SS,f�S Si?}? S�t ?�1'" ^rYy�J ;u SS t�t?5 � Z{ R : fl #.# }f t RIBrk',i 3f• .� a.•iN r r nS k't 'f.',*, y.'7.-**- ,s ��a.f, C. y .� tes�'•a,1, • i- . CO ' : ..2.....L.,.,:-.,1- -. ''"".-7'''''..-:: ‘. " : -'..-••.- , : ''.i.-..'.'':'"'"--2'-,:"':'•'',';'.."1:::-",4.:.'e=-,...4.."'-''''.;.;'..,:.*'..-':•'.1:['-';'.--,i--''•:-";::::-::,..:;:,*;,":.'",..'...:-''..:',::::-.,-',.N..--.„;.. ..-: , .-:-.. . -J a.,1 Y - ' . .., ' .. -.-.- :--,_ . ,. .... ,,.,..:,.-,.,,:',..:. -:-... ..., , .. „ ,,... .:....',.--:.....,-.....,:..:„..,„:::-,,,..,.....,..._::.0, :::41,,..,:„,.....,.;,;,...'..„:„..i),..-.:.:.,..-',..,;;,„:.t,i,,,,.,..,,,,,-;.-,;:;:,,,,,,,,,:...,.„..-...,•:_.... n , •- i. . • . , ,. ..',. ,: . . -',, :,,_.;,,,: . .,., ., ;..-„,, • r r *`ti r. a ,�•, •.t'`.:. r � a k Tdw :n .''4..G '4.aEt..?.C•1 .• f�.,..*4 � C y:. f o` u4k t {�z :.- t ° .f t. •y� °:vkS'.•t•V rk•N a i (�t+{i sems h, :',..‘i.'1''';,...'".'-.'',ii: ' x> '`e�' 4r.�Y!T+ 94.14, .y. 1 fr Y �-j ••y•T^'�^"T s . `_•e .T f�. • • r e.y :.. :-: ...L. r•.•rye' _.. ,mot C--- ` � fi�: --.d AFFIDAVIT OF RILING STATE OF OREGON ) .•• ' County of Washington )' ss. •-,' - City of Tigard H • I Cathy t�Ib�atley� first being duly sworn; on- oath depose and say: (Please Print) That I am a.n Office Assistant II .. for the City of Tigard, .Oregon. 4° That I served notice of the Tgard City Council.: Notice of Final . ,. Decision - Resolution 86-117 (Marx) —� _ _ _ . , i. o f i which the attached s a =copy (Marked Exhibit A).'upon each of the following nettled persons cin the 3rd . day of November 19 .86 ,• by mailing. , *\''":•--' t o each of them at the address shown on the attached list (Marked.Exhibit. B), said notice is ,hereto attached, and deposited in the United State mail on the i - x: 3rd day of November , •19 5...b.,, postage prepaid. ri . .. , p," e .. :-..::::.: Prepared Nltice ,,� : .a• l F_/ 0 Mailed N1otiee/Delivered o Post Office Subscribed and sworn to before me. this ,, ,'' day of .:.�°'� _ - ,• 197 • Als, Note .y Diable ®f Oregon, C" 4------4„,,,,,,,,,, u1ARCHA K. HUNT My Commission Expires _ji '° NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON x My Commission Expires/A .5—° ... [.:.7.::..1: , _ ,:.. ■ a „. ,.,. ,,,, ., 1, • t -R re CITYOFTWAD / .-:::: :: \, - _ AS l N COUNTY, WREGVN. , 1 / 4Y :' CONPREHENSI LI AN AmENMEETL4PNE cHANGIAggEELQBAIKAmgE AMENDMENT APPLICATION " CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Boy: 23397 .. Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. 7(),49-5-... RECEIPT NO. ..--. .;7': . . .. ' •, : : APPLICATION CCEPTED BY DATE: 1 2 1 e GENERAL INFORMATION A pp lication elements submitted; ; ;:. --`. - PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 10500 and 10520 S.W. A) Application form (1) " B Owner's s si nature/written : ,...,',..7.-.. Cascade Blued. , Tigard, Oregon �R ,� ) � :: .• TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. S135BA Tax Lots 3302 & authorization 3 3 0 3 (C) Applicant's statement (15 copies) :- SITE SIZE 1. 59 Ac. , .. PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER*Barbara Ph. r Trust � (D) Filing fee (S ) ADDRESS 13627 Sunset Blvd. PHONE Z13/'t gg( Additional information for Compre- �,; CITY Pacific Palisades, CA ZIP 90272 sive Plan Map Amendments/Zone Changes 1 " APPLICANT* (E) Maps indicating property r T . + P i NE !3 ;2 'i3$,� location (15 copies)ADDRESS Same as Owner y• CITY Satre g Omgr ZIP (P) List of property owners f. ,.,,,'1.....--- *When the owner and the applicant are different within 250 feet (1) . .'-. 7*, ..:'.. people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record (G) Assessor's Map (1) . . possession transfer instrument (1) :,;. .;, .. or a leasee in osses�ion with written authorization �(�i) Title t from the owner or an agent of the owner with written 1 authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or ' -- submit a written authorization with this application. DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: .. 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: request a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (if COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: -; applicable) from to : 1 --,..,,,,e.�.�.�.� •�..so..�..�s .oar :0s°° 4 ;,. and a Zone Change from to , . N.P.O. Number: OR The applicant requests an amendment to the ! Commission Approval Date: . following sections of the Comprehensive Plan or Community Development Code Zone Or.anance ,' Amendment 1,47'_. , ..;., 1.4 ICity Ceuncil Appro val Date: �; (KSL:pm/0737F) . _ w is r` .. .;-• - :.• -7-9 R# al •04.1,-f.,....,- -' ,- ,..„..) 444,,,,,, ; it. ' : pn.,,,„, ,, . . ,..,: . . ... .':...-,...-- -......-,,..... :-...4.-t.-.- ...‘ , --. ,. --1 -. S . , 1 c t, C -�� .z t..',J s •, i - '• - dr:- , .. , , . - ,, -f y • n } ° A - o E,, �. - ` z and use actions to; - ;, its.®nal��.usos, orb ether-� 3 r 3i t 'and ar .ence Doan - os `part d ''''h1:43''applications _ • App1i To h€ve a .compl Cpl•.•:::'1:.- ation au w 1'-1 'n'e- to submit $ttath�edte . 4. cants: - ete � �.� �' < descr '�edl # n the attached information sheet. at the time;.: you :::t9:21:'Itilaa::::.this' _'' appl cation., 5. T <A]'pLIci}iT(S),Soh CERTIFY THA`Tz. A. •_The abQVe= rc� ,eet does.. not violate n deed : rastrietx.onss: be - t t attached:_ to ® imposed upon the .eu�i• ect. ga�pety• lioant will exercise '- the rights B. If the application is granted, the APP `,_ granted .in accordance with the germs and subject to '`all the conditions and' liffiitat ens of the approval. q ...:.1-..:.:-. . } C.. . 4 .l.. ,of the; above statom rats and the. state aerate in tyre .said. :-tha attachments, and exhibits transmittehd herewith are , , j emit issued, . :�ased: , rah this : applicants so ackiowledge that any p :. a lication, y bce revoked .if it is found, that any auch stateneuta are false. l catiosi, including . •_. applicant hoe read the ent�.tre contents .of the apP ., _. D. The app the policies end criteria, and understands the .requirements for a3,159.___,,proving or denying the application. ,,,:i.,...[..,.._:'...::, DATED this �.- day of l .t --�- ;;.. of the sub ject p operty. . q(e hubanf ach owner d and wife SIGNATURES of . .<.# . -24.47,6 e •:err ,- .. P. eet�a -�rag,.. .M � � ts e :r :,, l:s a• •'ti �t � :y Y f 51 M1 ? I b - ,.,k.- ' . ,' ' ', , 0 -; EINTS " T.ut1 23`` "1'98:6 �. w PROM: Tigard Planning 1 epar°tmern 4' Marx for .Zone Ordinance'Amendment-. ..., , Rl�; ���. 5--8fi bequest bg�'1r�.est &. l;arbara. l�a�: 4ti `� 1G a enc. adm�nistrationt to Title 18 of the Tigard Mu i cipal Code to allow Quhl g g .. �naA .�,end, clva.c asseit►bl. snare= • • e �. retaa.l• sales �a��.,te ser��.ces= 1®�i e p gate hulti . es• odg$se such as :furniture & large a�ppli.ances),' and persona sonal services, ..., general, as permitted uses n the. iP 1 clay trs,a r ®ne v-: Attachod is the Sites Plan and: applcant°S statement for your 'r"evi . ' From inf r�m*tion supplied' by various departments and' acme es; and from of ier :_�' ir'rfor rat$on a i fable to our staffs s a report' and r°ecas mar dat�o�,. wild be prepared. and a decision will be rendered on the proposal xn t e near= uture If tau wish to comment on thus appii;cation, we need your comments � A ;ust' ' :'-. is , 'i9 8 You may use the p ce provided below or attach a si parara letter to return your comments. ®u ar b1r t® res, on�i b� tie �� ye te please phone a t6 a staff contact noted below' .wi.th your,comments and confirm r comments in writing as soon as possible 1i you have z' and questions regarding this tte contact the Tigard p ann rag �epar*tnrent, p �, Box 2 387, Burnham and`Ash Ave. . Tigard, OR 9? 28. Phone. 639-4171:: 4..^. STAFF CONTACT i thi den ..-'1, -...,.":"; PLEASE CHECK THE FOL.LOWI NG ITEMS THAT APPL a we have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it' , ....,-:.'. Please co tae ,_.,.,- of our office.. Please refer to th enclosed letter Written comments tit 1 4,` .a . g , . , ' . ' ,: . ,, , ,... ilef'lic, ,... , ', i. Commenting: j of Person Name t Phone o /0356P(KSLz p r a. NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS 2: CITY DEPART LENTS •, Building Inspector Parks R creation Board City Reco rder .�.....�.. Police E ineeri g-Randy Other 3. SPECIAL DISTRICTS , �►n) Tualatin R.F.P.D. School Dist. Mo. 48 (Beaverton) _ Washington Co. F.D. No. i , School Dist, No. 233 (Tigard) W.D. Other Metzger W.D. 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Boundary Commission Wash. Co. Land Use & Trans. Dept. Brent Curtis * METRO Kevin Martin Planning Department Other 5. STATE AGENCIES Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) DOGAMI Engineer Division of state Lands Commerce Dept.. M.H. Park Surd of Health �° I- Highway Div. Lee Gunderson — Fish & Wildlife Parks & Recrea. Div. (ODOT) — LCOC Subdivision Supervisor __-- PUC Dept. of Energy ,, .Fire Marshall } ; _ Dept. of Environ. Quality Other } 6. FEDERAL AGENCIES Corps of Enginers Other Post Office 7• SPECIAL AGENCIES Portland General Electric General Telephone � . . ; Pacific Northwest Bell ,Other Northwest Natural Gas (Pm/0257P) 4 .3 'v, .6 .6 - , , , , ,co''' -, - , - .- . ,z,,,_. 0 4` 5. PUBLIC HEARING —' Kt EELAND ESTATES ROAD AND EAsEmEtarr f VACATXOI - ; ' a. Public Hearing Opened b. , Acting Recorder outlined the history of the request'noting that r,° Council had initiated the vacation request, on '/128/$6, She stated that all surrounding property owners were notif itd' and J that Lincoln Castings -and Loan, viil.l pay all fees required Prior to .,..„; the recording of the Ord iroance ' . c, public Testimony: '4O one appeared to testify,. ': d. Acting Recorder recommended approval with the conditions .listed „: y` in the ordinanr:e• She also advised that the Planning, Commission recommended approval. ' e, Public Hearing Closed r f. ORDINANCE NO. 16 44. AN ORDINANCE' VCICATING cERTA,I, N UTILITY EASEMENTS AND A ROAD RIGHT—OF AY AREA WITHIN; KNFE-LAN!® ESTATES .• SUBDIVISION AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. g. Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Brian` to adopt. ~'' a' Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. •.... r z-'y a:. r MA a f*''5i,. d, ; �.. hR.XNA CE AMEN S `IP ZONE USE .AfiEN ENT 6. PUBLIC HEARING a: the.Plannin "C?milli`s ion xt�+ 'deny a request `byL E s� ' _ i •gym,. c Y g' j, J✓,.1� )"^NZ A recommendation b• ,..,,for a Zone Or^d inance Amendment to, .Title 18 of w.,the and E�artcara,; Niar ,.' e • • •�� T�.gard f�unzcipa►1 Code to allow public agency atl�nin�str°atiorr '`services; lodge, fraternal and civic assembly, gtaneral retail sales (limited to bulky merchandise such as furniture and large appliances); and•'per'sanaI services as permitted uses in the T-P (Industrial. Park) zone. I approved an amendment to Section 16.50 of the Tigard t4unicipal Code would be required. ;' a. Public Nearing Opened' b• Community Development Director synopsized the request of Mr• . 6 :. Mrs. Marx to allow public agency adinistration, general. retail sales, and personal services to be permitted Uses ' in the I—P: zone. Staff requested conditions be established to de'4e1op clear . criterion to strictly limit the use of bulky mer•cEhand -se. • c. Public Testimony: No one appeared to testify :' d. Community Development Director noted the Planning Commission recommended denial however, staff t elt: approval` with condition`s would be appropriate e. Council and staff discussed concerns ' eegard`zng .:the I P zone in general throughout the City. Council pol .cy would rneec to be , ens�^al througho r •.� studied to determine whether. fully co i mercial 'and:, -f u .l industrial.. areas are best or' whether. these should,•be blepdod,` ' City Administrator stated industrial zones are ,frag i.ef.and ,need r_ COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER R, 1986 � � v � , r 'i ti K pg2 , x r • 'fie recommender to be' protected'. .low and. study this * ssu e 3 @ s endata0fl and go y ��th�R . ,. . J ���iniss i�2�'i J A e4►� .d' t�fe �� �onrw.'#.. Iu�� `w;• , :, riot•�A to salon+?, ri:oaif icat3.cns ae,n d. #4 recomileert ed d9n .a'1',oe i .. �� � 9�evelcpssent l2a��ctor stat�;d APO �'1-�� �� change request. He suggested.' Council 'direct stiff study' � .- thas g d P1.aann;�ng *;$mmxss .on process to _�D-Clt through thy'.; �1PO ab`s d.a, completely'this issue more core Y f#, Publac Hearing Closed . a: rec4nded lay. 'Co�+nc i ls�r `radon to c�Pny - �,�� � �+ A�, motion by �a�unci for Dr•�.an. :; : . *:- request , based on the issues addressed and request staf•. � the " requ •-repare denial final order for Council consider�at1on ' Approved by Unanimous vote of.Councll .P-s"esent. � as for .staff to go back to the _�P�s and �� h. Consensus of Council � tile cascade Area end ,the �~R Placni€�g CosrMissian and study - . t�st�i�.l as it relates to the ' • d melting of comslerc :al an in ' zone. ;, -..:1.-:':-;' • � � ci.ir a 1a1TS^ PARK X11 ;,',. -. (INDUSTRIAL � . ; ,riM } � s Council to review ��� ;r ,M n �� _ An appeal by Egu�t�ies �.�os�t�west. �ror tKe Katy reGt�ar's gnterpretati�on on action 18.68.030. of the-,:.. Cos�snunit� Development Code a Appeal Hearing Opened - l�;cant .had sre�uested ^ . � �� d b ©eJielopment Director noted the app . b• Ccmmun ty . •t of co�t�e�ci�l. use area in the I-P zone than the' � . : ; y a_higher density s. The applicant contended that K(ol1 & ' 11nbus Business 1 code allows. � =as one pro: act. to ''a�.l®w for -the_ _ : Parks should be considered `: ` .*; ; commercial use• Community^ Deueloprent Director; stated .� additional cornme l .' 1 interpret ret, the .'two► Business Parks as one 'since they - µ ;� he couldn't P �� � ;, o ed on separate parcels and at .different ti es. were Bevel p set a dangerous precedent since `the intent of:' - • adVased this could �,. a striaA.�pne: -one was to not promote commercial u.te in the ind4 � � the � � ,.. ' - Appellants: , a stated hi�. concern-:',, a" o j i m Foster, 11334 `SW 'Ironwood Loop, . :. rk x robl`etss in F. cooking smells and possible $ C p ,' , .egardng � oachenentw <'! 1,., did. not want any. more encr the area and stated he into the greenway for Parking. der read into tire. record a letter`.°frog Raymond t. � Acting Recur � st�►tingl�thay , " � � �, 0 ® and Beatrice �chsimll, ' 19.32 SW Yrorsu�o©d Loop, r t��1 ppppo d the .request on the basis'of parking needs. eg�as�S ,l1 d Sieng nnethe pa4r0 k inSg► Lanroos!�p a o 14ited cgnc ns ` .. .,. , d e1 f+ od In he r i F*' e• hbor hood and o ps ed the re gue�te a ' } `r .--'',-:....-:-....::. , '' 'SEPTEMBER � ,Y,jc{Gu f'F,h. f -`tt ,$ ' g"`xya'. 7 fi t'{`';; r ry A x r 2 3,.. ik zti i'r, }(.f�! w,.t ' c, e t'z `7 tM ' ..,,o..,;;:','"J'''.'s CIL MINUTES 8 s 1956 s ,, ,i 1. ° rh _ 7 , i d;, . ,: �f7" , i: � , s: s,r ,,r-='.:4-'.?...- + p x 4 r ?y d y+ rrf' p '', h,, Yy A.r-r.. /,• r�i a",+t. '(.t k � RECESS REGULAR CO1]1‘NCYL, MiEET NG: 8:42 PM .• 12. LOCAL C °RACT REVIEW 12.1 Call to Order Roll. Call: Preset'It: Board Chairman, John,Cook Board Members Tom Brian, Carolyn Eadon, Jerry, Ediar"ds, and Valerie 3ohnson, City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel, and Eorreen Wi].son, Acting City Recorder 12.2 Authorize Call For Bids l - • a, Community Development Director recommended Council authorize the call for bid on the Summer Lake/Anton Park Drainage Project since Council, at their 9/22/86 meeting, approved it being',added to the , CIR - b. Motion by Board Member Brian, seconded by Board Member Edwards to authorize the call for bid. . Approved by unanimous vote of the Board 'present. 4 . s. 12.3 Adjournment: 8:44 1-M RECONVENE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING: 8:44 PM 13 CONSENT AGENDA' These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to - 13.1 Approve Council Minutes - September 8, ,15, & 22, 1986 13 .2 Receive and File: { : • � . a. Council Meeting Calendar Update b. Community Development 6 Month Report c. Capital Improvement Project Status Report, September, 1986 13.3 Approve Final Oder Interpretation of �4! Director's Decision Regarding I-P Zone NW - Res©jtxan �c 06-11'6; , ,_ Approve Final Order Denying ZOA 5-86; - Resolution NO.-86-117 13,5 Approve Contingency Appropriation For City-Wide. 'Staffin Request Resolution No. 86-118 13.6 Approve Chief of Police Vehicle Purchase CC 13.7 Approve Street Dedication - Walter West Corporation. Murray Blvd. Extension/135th Avenue Q•. 13.8 Approve Butler Terrace 'Subdivision Compliance Agreement Authorize Signatures 13,9 Approve Council-initiated Easement Vacation Publ .<: Hearing Englewood #3 - Resolution No 86-119 a. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Johnson to approve Consent Agenda with the September 15th Minutes under 13 . L ; being amended as suggested by the City Recorder, item 13,6 being . amended by not passing a resolution but approving the vehicle purchase, and 13.5 being removed for further discussion: Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. Page '7 COUNCIL. MINUTES OCTOBER 13, 1986 ° 'i a ti Ys.Ght t.91�Y tf�tif"'�•�`�4L"4t't fY l41 aSY�''K•§eFxk Y7 1.}'!b&;n+R •l +- fi' ..wY:,ir xr_4:•Y+�A 5th 'a t, rot�. F Y ; t ,I t •..y -•., 9, .>w'3 r. l.k4'F.wee ,9 "P t' ,7 �txYGARD Ott { AGC NGA D--'' S 4ARY .. - . • � �tOber. ��' �"9�16 M�'�"�'1E©;. : -., .,. �' ®� � s 1a 1 Cc�n��� gyp Q 0' .'aa y' ,. .,;ORl�41Ti31Q9 d P REPA ,a ` �ith lien P UESTt.D Y: CITY`A€MTh C►K REQ •' !EAR} CK � .. [DEPT �i PQLIC t .:..-7-...,. .. R �t. ••3.-.. 8b tha`.Cauncil•Aden .:� ied the above ata� � egte�her� .8, � , a k. � re �atht'd hp `Councit.• �,� the` res�l�fiian q T 1 • Y, 11L'I°ER , itiE8 -sIDERED the resalut�an. e l. Auth®r%ze the-.mayor'.to a sign 2 e Author ize the mayor t©;sign'sin 'amended r a�.ut.iaan a '... it ..-::. n . . . ,. , * , ., :: . ..iscAt.... ,,T...m_p,.A,c1". , , , ., . . . :,. ., :::,...„,..: ,, :-::,,..- „,,.".,:i.'•.',.:.,','..-.,,',„.,-',',.:,....,:.',...',.,-,4„,,,,.-_,..,..-,,,,,;::::',:,,',....--;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,••••,,,..,:::„.,,,:,:,...,..,:.,i,,.,...i:::,.,,,,..,,,,,,..,..,...,:_i:,.,:.:,:.,:.,.i...'.',.;:,:.-..7.,...• • • � • '. .',:•.--::,::,,•.j.,:::::::...i.'",,,,:.',::,'.::::::,...:',1.:'::-:;.:::,:::::,':::,::::',:.'3,,:::•.:- r� ry 1 t. v ilternativ Y • II I a 'One t `��• •i tea. p 1 • �' 4'l d`i'` ' .-fit _ .Xr s f � 11 ��+ •�r,. i �d .. { :a ? Y. x Lek.+rru,.. ::..y;:aw..t.S ow t •xr i '^w4.i •K +� '.r ..k.`". ae .. ;_ . . , CITY OF TIGieRD, RESOLUTId o $6- A FINAL ORDER IN THE ,MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR, A ZONE ORDINANCE At4EN!►B ENT (��A 6�E6� REQUESTED SY ERNEST. AND BARBARA MARX, DENYING THE APPLICATI . ENTERING°FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS a plicants requested a Zone Orddinance Amnefldnent, to :Title 18 of the Tigard N!i»a�icipal .Cade to allow public agency admiraistrsetiwe ' services, lodge fraternal and civic assembly, general retail ;.sales (1 imited to balky merchandise); and personal services as peen)Itted uses in the I—P. (Industrial.` Park) zone. ': * ' WHEREAS, the Tigard Plaxlning Commission heard the above. application at its : ' regular meeting of August 19,. 1906, and recommended. denial; WHEREAS. the Tigard City Council.` heard the above appl i.catiOrn 5-{at :.its regular .t.. meeting of September 8, 1956 No one *ppearred to` testify regarding this ::., proposal. THEREFORE, SE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City.Council that: Section 1: The proposal is not consistent with' all relevant criteria az ¢. discussed in the April 8, 1986, Planning staff report to Planning Commission (Exhibit "A°) Section 2: The City Council upholds they Planning °Commission recommendation .. for denial of the Zone Ordinance Amendment as set or'th. in � Exhibit 1°Soo ORDER$ that the above referenced request.` Section 3: The Council, :therefore, � �. be, and the same hereby is DENIED. The Council :FURTHER 'ORDERS that the Planning Director and the City Recorders send a :copy' .of; the Final Order as a Notice of Final Decision to the rtie in 'd this case. PASSED: This ,.�.� day of , 1986. May®r• a�i.ty of Tigard ATTEST; Acting City Recorder City of Tigard ,a, dj/193 d RESOLUTION NO 86- Y Pagel u r y• r Y M ...... . ks.n•.n ,.:., .•v«.,.rn.c•« Y,alu.,u...,ea.. .. F+.dk+n:4 +,x. v.^r:s v'4.}..1? I .t.4J.Ir'ifa•Y'...tNP . ' _ 4vif+Y,,aXJ:YW,/..iViAiu RA4'.,#:i�i4 yMi.,1.+rw r.`r'.r3• .... • AGE inA ITEM 5.3 • PLANNING `' a-..I$SI4i+ August '19 1986 . MEMO .q . eve$gfitiStar ° 's T0: Planning Commission FROM Keith 4..i.den, Se i.or Planner RE: 2 .5 R. .wfor Ernest and Barbara Marx . A. FACTS 1. General Information CAS:. . Zone Ordinance Amendment ZOA 5-86 , REQUEST* To allow public agency administrative services; lodge, fraternal and civic assembly; general retail sales (limited to bulky merchandise such as furniture and large appliances); and ti personal services, general as permitted uses in the I-P (Industrial Park) zone. } APPLICA Ernest and Barbara. Marx ------- 13627 Sunset Blvd. Pacific Palisades, CA 90272 2. Seel__ (Industrial Park) adopted by the City i {. • The I-P YndustrYal Park zone was ado ted b n November, 1933: One amendment of this zone occurred in 1985, resulting in the list of permitted and conditional uses contained in the applicant's narrative. 3. Proposal Descriptio2r The applicant is proposing that several additional uses be allowed in the I-P zone. The contention is that these use are consistent with the intent oc of the zone and compatible with or similar to other allowed, uses. Listed '. below are the proposed uses to be added, the Community Development Code definitions, and the zones in which these use are .," presently allowed. me Public Administrative Agency Refers to public service providers, record keeping, clerical, or public contact services that deal directly with the citizen, together with incidental storage and maintenance of necessary vehicles, and excludes commercial use type, "Professional and Administrative Services." Typical use types are associated with ' governmental offices. (Permitted C--N, 0-G, 0.-P, and CBD zones.) tl T. ZOA 5- 96 (Earnest & Barbara Marx) Page 1 Lodge, Fraternal, and Civic Assembly - Refers to meetings and activities primarily conducted for the members of a particular group. Excluded frog this use type are uses N . le classified as group residential, group care, and transient lodging " .+ . ' (all types) Typical uses include meeting places for civic clubs, lodges, or fraternal or veterans organizations. (Permitted , C—P, CUD zones, conditional R—l2, R-26, R-40, and zones.) ,. . . General Retail Sales Refers to the sale or rental of commonly used goods, and merchandise for personal or household use, but excludes those classified as Agricultural Sales, Animal Sales and Services, Automotive and Equipment, Business Equipment Sales and Services, Construction Sales and Services, Food and Beverage Retail Sales, and Vehicle Fuel Sales. Typical uses include department stores, apparel stores, furniture stores, pet stores; or book stores (Permitted C-C, CBD zones, permitted with 20% limit on total floor area of a project C-P and I-P zones.) ,a .- Personal Services Facilities Refers to the establishments primarily engaged in the y ed g g provision of informational, instructional, personal improvement, and similar services of nonprofessional nature but excludes services classified . under Spectator Sports and Entertainment Facilities, Participant Sports and Recreation, or Transient Lodging. typical uses include . = photography studios, driving schools and trade schools or reducing salons. (Permitted C--G, C—P, CBD zones, permitted with 20% limit on total floor area of a project. I--P zone.) 4. Agency, & NPO Comments The Engineering and Building Inspection Division have no objection to the . ' request . NPO # 1 and 4 have recommended against the proposal. OD `� No other comments have been received. B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS } Section 10.30.120 of the Community Development Code states that ordinance C .: amendments shall be consistent with Statewide Planning Goals, federal and state statutes, applicable plans adopted by Metro, applicable Comprehensive Plan policies, and relevant ordinances. No Plan policies apply directly to this application and none of the other items mentioned above would be in conflict with this request. The purpose statement for the I—P zone and a comparison with the other uses presently allowed in the zone provide the most suitable guidance for reviewing this proposal: The relevant purpose statements in Section 18.68.010 (a) of the Code are �.. subsections (1), (2), and (4) which are stated below: ZOA 5-86 (Earnest & Barbara Marx) — Page 2 • '. ." a1 r -.n-n i, . ,.e ♦:S.i Ya t`1.Y.o.x 5•4.♦t.Y.•f .'ip...>... > . S, . .Ylt.t Y:I:Y r ..... a"YS ir. te . (1) For combining light manufacturing, office and complementary related commercial use e.g., restaurant,_ barber shop, beauty salons and fitness centers (2) For combining uses which have no off—site impacts in terms of noise, odor, glare, lights, vibration, smoke, dust, or other types of e . off-site impacts; ;a y, • r .S (4) Which prohibit residential uses. Public Agency Administrative Services are consistent with the above 14. 4 • purpose statements and this use is similar to other categories permitted : ; in the IMP zone such as financial, insurance and real estate `services; professional and administration services; and research services. Public - ' { agencies and utility companies would be well suited for the I—P zone, particularly when vehicle and equipment storage is necessary. Lodge, fraternal, and civic assembly meets the above purpose statements . :`• and it should be noted that this is not a residential use. there are no • similar uses presently allowed in the I—P zone .p General retail for bulky merchandise is presently permitted in the I-P` zone if it does not exceed 20% of the total square foot of a development. The sale of bulky merchandise involves more extensive storage requirements Y than other commercial retail establishments. Also, the traffic generation of these uses is less than most retail uses as reflected by the parking requirement in the Code for one space for every 1.000 square feet of floor i area. The Planning staff does not object to the g object presence of bulky merchandise sales in the I--P zone, however, clear criteria should be formulated to strictly limit this use to bulky merchandise only and to avoid the '- establishment of businesses which sell a variety of large and small. merchandise. Personal services, general are presently allowed on a similar basis as general retail sales. This category is consistent With the ` purpose statement for the I-P zone and the use appears to be compatible with the '... t intent of the zone. Since the present vocational training center located on the property owned by the applicant occupies more than 20% of the total ee floor area, it is considered as a non-conforming use. OE C. RECOMMENDATION tele The Planning staff recommends approval of the above proposal to allow i eM public agency administrative services; lodge, fraternal, and civic assembly; and personal services, general as permitted uses in the I-P zone. The sale of bulky merchandise is also appears appropriate, provided that clear definitions and/or criteria are established to Prohibit variety stores which are only partially devoted to the sale of such merchandise. The staff will be prepared at the hearing to discuss possible methods for enforcement of this distinction between the two types of general retail +.: sales. dj/119 •. , ZOA 5-86 (Earnest & Barbara Marx) Page . .. ... ..mod, •- i � + .,. � . a '•1'. ..♦'t.1r`1.11y1'Xir. 'k'Y.f t+ i•1t x' .W- 'G,,.... . Jwren......o-t.yi..;t.t sr,.J.ytb,rn°k. a+..w,.,,..;,.:s.r.J.J.'n tb5it,N5 .t1ikT�5kySHl:*+• .»..v.ia:.._:tr.i:, 1'• • a..v4t'.1.rYti :. J. ,w.. v...,,.,.:•.+ N.«K+r+)Spa..t•u•.#,-+«:•.a. v, :rrtk, kawtic.Se2!a:ru..{,i rr,,..Y�n tr4'a=h.s r +••,r..,v;.t.at5.t.+y s,in., :, 5.2 SUBDIVISION S'147468 LOT LINE ADJU9SThE 1T M 6-86, VARIANCE V 13-86 NPO #1 3 ALBERT AND VIRIGNTA' qI REK PiPO / 3 0 Y 6: 1'. t. This item will be readeertisea.*g041M4gfkring later in the year. '. RECESS 8:45 PM RECONVENE 8:55 Pfd 5.3 ,Z"ONE:'B RDIANCE--AtEN '' 'ZO r''S- U6. -E RINEST AND BARBARA MARX' (TITLE : 8) A A request for a Zone Ordinance Amendment; to Title le of the Tigard Municipal Code to allow public agency administration services; lodge, :- fratenal and civic assembly; general retail sales (limited to bulky merchandise such as furniture and large appliances); and personal services as permitted in the IP (Industrial Park) zone. 0 Commissioner Newman stated that he would not participate as a Commissioner in this hearing as his wife is one of the tenants on the property and he . would be testifying as an individual. Senior Planner Liden reviewed the proposal. Lengthy discussion followed regarding changes being proposed. .. 4' APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION 4 . 0 Chuck Cota, Cushman & Wakefield, 111 SW 5th Ave. , Suite 2400, Portland, OFt . 97204, representing the applicant. Explained this request was the result of property located on SW Cascade Blvd. next to Power Rents. He explained that his client will be upgrading the property and , would like the _. flexibility to lease to uses that are being permitted in the area, such as Levitz. He questioned whether Power Rents was being categorized appropriately. They had originally wanted to do a Zone Change on the property, but staff had discouraged them:, and suggested they request a modification to the IP zone permitted uses. He stated that the parking requirements for bulky funiture are the same as for other warehouse uses ' - and would be appropriate for what' is in the area now. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o Geraldine Ball, NPO 0 4 Chairperson, stated that their NPO felt that the property should have a zone change rather than changing the IP zone city ., wide. =, o Will Newman, 10065 SW Riverwood Lane, stated that his wife is the Director of the School which occupies half the facility in question. He did not support the proposed change. He did not feel the site had adequate •' parking as is and felt ..the request was more for a CG zone than a IP zone. He. also opposed changing the zoning on the property to CG. REBUTTAL Y o Chuck Cote, explained that their preference would be for a comprehensive plan and zone change, however staff would not support that proposal. He : �: stated that the site has 60 parking spaces, which is adequate for the existing use. He continued that because of the change of uses in the area they would like the ability to lease to a wider market. .PL"f 1NIPJ OOMtitg iON P1IhU1 tS ' i ti T' •i9, ' 1966 PAGE 3 ri .. •.. Vie.� 'r .. .a`. - ,. .. �; ...1R�"' - • ill) o Discussion followed regarding staff's position on the comprehensive plan and zone- chime. Staff felt the entire; area should be evaluated rather than changing than zoning on this one piece of property. t PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED O Consensus of the Commission was that it would not be appropriate to change the IP zone eras for the entire City. It would be more appropriate to evaulate the entire area to see if a C C designation should be assigned to the area. , Commissioner •fyre moved 'and Commissioner Vanderwood seconded to forward ZOA 5-86 to City Council with a recommendation for denial. Motion carried ' by majority vote of Commissioners present. Commissioner Newman abstained. i RECESS 9:32 PM RECONVENE 9:45 PM :. 5.4 SIGN CODE EXCEPTION SCE 9-56 CROW/SPEIKER/HOSFOR® NPO ## 5 •� Request for a Sign Cede Exception to allow for the expansion of one free standing, sign and the ability to modify a second sign of three free standing signs which previously received Sign Exception approval (SCE 1-55) on property zoned a- (Commercial General). Located: SW Garden Place (WCTM 2S1, 18R lot 400, 1400, and 1600) Senior Planner Liden reviewed the previous approval and explained that 4 this proposal would'4, ncrease the size of the sign on Hall Blvd. to the i. •. same size as the one"fin SW Pacific Highway. Also, they would like the ability to add a reader, board to the sign located on Highway 217, if necessary. 44:w •APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION 4 Y d Randy Mawhir^ter, 9350 SW Tigard, 'Lu a,inite Sign, explained that his client was still having difficulty with people finding their location. He stated that the message sign for 217 is comet ing •they are anticipating. however, it may not happen. They would not be iiic,reasing the size of the sign on Highway 217 if they decide to make this chaff,. c a at a signs would look like, e� Discussion followed regarding location and what g PUBLIC TESTIMONY . o No one appeared to speak. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED t,t o The majority of the Commissioners supported the proposal. COFffiissioner Newman was concerned that the '^wader board sign location on H y 217 would cause a visual distraction as it is located where the traffic-,zmerges onto 217 from Pacific Highwaay. :', Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Vanderwood seconded to .appr•! 'er the SCE 9-86 as submitted. Motion: carried by majority vote of' Commissioners present. Commissioner Newman voting no. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 19, 1995 – PAGE 4 C.yd r '• :' p •b , -- tsAAC ,E.NZ.E/ 9&ASSOCIATESI p.C.,. 1:;-:::'.::: ' :''':::'-:- 1. :M ri _ a•WASH! •V'rTcbl N :� !!ll� KEN�l�I� ' I6,f ipHf 1 EC,f S PLANNEn a, PORT LA..I' OREGON.97201 `(O30.224 9570 �•. 90.S:W �AN�CFiO�' S� SET T u � r : f�;::::,.::..., vt.....,.; , October 7, 1985 .. Off !:. 'j :'',, '4, ''', , ,., *:.:'''''',' ''', '1 ."::T and :City ounc l , ;Pl-►N � 9 . duo Bi11 Monahan, Director:gf ;Conauunity Development ' 1` 765 S.W Ash T gard, + R 97223 Dear Gounci 1 Members: ;::.:•-•-•:'' '.-.:''.. -REd Ernie`Marx Property, SO'Wa-Cascade Avenue a •f Project umber 295403 wri•tin. do behalf of.fir.,Ernie Mars, t e owner of property on SW Cascade �Avenue f Ia 9 next to the .°`Power Rents" building.1 ro osed a change in the "IP'" zone text to allow an expanded.range . Mr. Mari recent y p p of . land use , more suitable to meet the needs of bhiid ng owners with .condot�on� t' similar to his. Unfortunately, due to some confusion 'in the receipt of notification . your ublic hearings neither Mr. Marx nor his realtor. were in attendance to present , the rase` to you. tand that Burin� your hearing there was some discussion of a better alternative e unders 9 :... the Marx property, and possibly adjacent similar sites, to Commnerci,al d being to rezone th.. Marx's ori ina1 intent un�•i l the staff •.- ,(:�� . .t General. Coincidentally, this was -Mr.. 9 . suggested that possibly the text amendment would he:a 'better, approach to the problem {•.: 99 r u€sted that Mackenzie�Sai to & Associates prepare the necessary material. w, .� Mr. Marx has requested to resent a Plan-Zone change to com �erei al nor his property, acrd addagent sites f Q�' p We are ,now contacting property owners In the area► and • o � so desired by the w�ners.. - a starting work on the application materials. w filing dates for Plan Amendments, with a public hearing not possible until : . The normal 9 Marx duo: to the need to. either. early 1987, presents a significant problem,for 9r. r new long term leases or mate anticipated mprovements to the hiii ld ng at •aibout:.the e 9 l. . . ...n. vas. : ,,,same time as the hearing would occur- This is the reason the;past app g� nda submitted for your Fall 1986 age , _ - . , , .,,,, - ......., .,.:. ,, _.-.., ..,.,.. ,....i,,.-,:,...,,,,, .: ,,,,,•,,,:::, , f ,::: : ...,...: i . . ., . .. _, ,, ,..„ ., _, .. ,..,,:::. :.....; ' ....,,.-...--:•,,-,-, :',._,.,.: ! r4 • ''",lam,• 4� 4 ✓ a• v r. ^�^: e x ,,i 1 1 i µ i " - x t ;r �, cs )s •. i, rd "Cit �+n 1'•.�� � +Co_ �� k tk r � 3 ,. ? 1985` , Octobe r q T ,,,„ ,, : ,,, ,, ,,,,.:., : :,,, ,: ,,,,, :,. ..... A A: h'�u 1 Mr„ I;arx , A grant .. ,° `�o�,pto�th'e,se{ and.sua�; Ci,r�t��n�tan�eS, .we ��°� q" , .°. '.,:,. �+� �esti� tat ; �� - end,a s a� .. { -a e�c�� .t�_��-..'t.�:, th�Y normal, 'time constraints s ��� '����a�` ����rdrato,��r�p���`�� .. n t .b'e r�ocessed as` soon as, ar:e able to 'obtaii n the;concur rence :of ,the ,,adjoini3n` prop rty: owners 'and prepare the :necessary n 'orwat: nn 9 = 'h4nk: ou .for your"cons derati.on. ..,,,,, ,,.,' . . .' , ' .,.,,, , :., , , .,,, ,, _, ..,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,, , ,,., , ., ,.,,,, , ,,, , . ,, ,,, . ,,,,.,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,, ....,., Sinicerely, ,. Lans Stout i - L°5/sk a oo° Ernie Mary Chuck Carta KeithLi den. ' ' .. '. , '' . '......• - L .' '• , • , '*.'. t''. ' ...:. ,n • : • A • •i • • `r •� # '4 t�G I'd• ...,,„.1-••••••••••1 3.•• , .,� r J } { r ° M1 v a ... �-�. J.. ,, - ' ... . { °i `d� ... ¢ . �... .. L ~ ,• N•. 1,max�; a° • I ". ' *'' ' 's'''''''' ' ' ' ' ' 0 ''''' ' 'SIT ''QF TIARB -'611Ed11 E !t !L Ni®A ITEt4.S RyY• • 66 '..PfEVY Iola `E6,dgg�nendat-ton cif denial. ISSUE/RCE dOA TIC: ZoA 5-86 .ana t'Comm isS .on r. : �K�it���L�:dan Ernest ° Bar ra iar PREP AR D i Y: 3 REQtlETEO 8Y.. ... . �gl'�' A0M$N�STdt , PO .]CCY ISSUE. g TI StttY ''.::' -......''::: ' ' ' ' n l*:....'..-:.;'..' ,'': . , ..... o. This Zone Qrdinance Am ndffient to modify the permitted uses. in tine I-P (Industrial Park) zone was reviewed --y .Flann�nd Commission �' tt eAugust ]'�.e ant`s . 19', 1986, and denial was recommend d. ttac ed is a py P!P narrative staff report, and Commission minutes Odra )• �..�: ': .' ps.y�.mlaslma1�1i1I�mOlRiata sllaY�lR�• AI.TER ATI1iES 9SI ER�ID 1. Request staff to prepare ordinance for approval as proposed. d• �° 2. Request staff to prepare a resolution for denial Request staff to prepare an ordinance-for Y app oval, with modifications. a;, , : ,, , , , ', . ,,. , , :-,:l . . ,,.::::... �e!aa a' w • ■Review information and make a decision as .,app opr ate : s,; r.:' ,fi ,i. ', . 5. PUBLIC HEALING - K AND ESTATES 2OAD AND EASEMENT Vligion r� a. Public Hearing Opened ...--..-te b. Acting Recorder outlined the history of the request noting that Council had initiated the vacation request on 7/28/86. She : stated that. all surrounding property owners were notified and that Lincoln Savings and Loan will pay all fees required prior to the recording of the Ordinance. c. Public Testimony: No one appeared to testify. ` •.` d. Acting Recorder recommended approval with the conditions listed in the, ordinance. She alsondvised that the Planning Commission recommended approval. e. Public Hearing Closed . f. ORDINANCE NO. 86-44 AN ORDINANCE VACATING CERTAIN UTILITY EASEMENTS AND A ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AREA WITHIN. KNEELAND ESTATES ,: SUBDIVISION AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. , ' p , g. Motion by Councilor Eadon, seconded by Councilor Brian«`to, adopt. :• Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 6.. PUBLIC HEARING -. ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 5-86 - IP ZONE USE AMENDMENT A recommendation by the Planning Commission to deny a request by Ernest ." and Barbara Marx for a Zone Ordinance Amendment to Title 18 of the Tigard Municipal Code to allow public agency administration services; lodge, fraternal and civic assembly; general retail sales (limited to bulky merchandise such as furniture and large appliances); and personal �:,: services as permitted uses in the I-P (Industrial Park) zone. If approved an amendment to Section 18.68 of the Tigard Municipal Code a=: would be required. a. Public Hearing Opened t.e. : b. Community Development Director synopsized the request of Mr. & Mrs. Marx to allow public agency administration, general retail a;: •` sales, and personal services to be permitted unses in the I-P zone. Staff requested conditions be established to develop clear criterion to strictly limit the use of bulky merchandise. c. Public Testimony: No one appeared to testify. d. Community Development Director noted the Planning Commission recommended denial however, staff felt approval with conditions _.,." would be appropriate. lea ::•.-. e. Council and staff discussed concerns regarding the I-P zone in general throughout the City. Council policy would need to be ~ and fully studied to determine whether fully commercial industrial areas are best or whether these should be blended. City Administrator stated industrial zones are fragile and need .I to be protected. He recommended Council take the Planning Commission's recommendation and go slowly and study this issue prior to making modifications in the I-P zone. Coni,ty 0, - Development Director stated NPO 01 and 04 recommended denial on this change request. He suggested' Council direct staff to go back through the NPO and Planning Commission process to study �• �� �� this issue more completely. • ® �' ` 4 141 f. Public Hearing Closed '�J g. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded .by Councilor Eldon to<"deny°� -•- '"-° :1 the request based on the issues addressed and request staff . prepare denial final order for Council consiegr"ation. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. h. Consensus of Council was for staff to go back to the NPOs and e, e Planning Commission and study the Cascade Area and the I-P melting of commercial and industrial as it, relates to the Cam; r . • - 5,2 SUBDIVISION S' 14--86, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT M 6-66, VARIANCE V 13-•-86 NPO # . .;, -. ALBERT AND VIRIGNIA-MI$TEREK NPO # 3 This item will be readvertised feet tea..,hearing ,later in the year RECESS 8:45 PM' RECONVENE 8:55 PAL • ,.; " 5'3 'ZONE ORDIANCE AMENDMENT ZOPt '5--36'r, E1ttdE5T ANA BARBARA A request f o r a Zone trd inanoe ' Amendment to Ti tle 18 of the Tigard Municipal Code to allow public agency administration services; lodge, .* : fratenal and civic assembly; general retail sales (limited to bulky K'' merchandise such as furniture and large appliances); and personal services • as permitted in the IP (Industrial Park) zone. o Commissioner Newman stated that he would not participate as a Commissioner in this hearing as his wife is one of the tenants on the property and he i' would be testifying as an individual. Senior Planner Liden reviewed the proposal Lengthy discussion followed regarding changes being proposed. • APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION • uite 2400, Portland, OR . -' 0 Chuck Cot Cushman � W�;k field, 111 SW 5th Ave. ,AveF, represen a app icant. Explained this request was the result a a_• of property located on SW Cascade Blvd. next to Power Rents. He explained that his client will be upgrading the property and would like the flexibility to lease to uses that are being Permitted in the area, such as Levitz. He questioned whether Power Rents was being catagorized appropriately. The had orig originally wanted to do a Zone Change on the • . � y 9 � B property, but staff had discouraged them and suggested they request a modification to the IP zone permitted uses. He stated that the parking : requirem -nts for bulky funiture are the same as for other warehouse uses and would be appropriate for what is in the area now. PUBLIC TESTIMONY � ���, i f -4 - o wry 1,'Q2 A0 1 NPO # 4 Chairperson, stated that their NPO felt that the 1 property should have a zone change rather than changing the IP zone city ,; wide. 0. OC o *mill Newman, Director 10065 SW Riverwood Lane, stated that his wife is the Di • of the School which occupies half the facility in question. He did not support the proposed change. He did not feel the site had adequate parking as is and felt the request was more for a CG zone than a IP zone. ° He also opposed changing the zoning on the property to CG. REBUTTAL o Chuck. Cota,, explained that their preference would be for a comprehensive plan and zone change, however staff would not support that proposal. He stated that the site has 60 parking spaces, which is adequate for the • existing use. He continustd that because of the change of uses in the area they would like the ability to lease to a wider market. • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES. AUGUST _l}, 138E — PAGE 3 • • r • • dik , } - :d ® Discusliion followed regarding staff's position on the comprehensive plan and zone ehanne. Staff felt the entire area should be evaluated 'rather than changing ... _ � ncJ the coning on this one.piecoa of prolaeo^ty. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSES o Consensus of the Commission was that it would not be appropriate : •: "' to change " the IP zone uses for the entire City. It would be more apPropriate to - °+ evaulate the entire area to see if a C--G denigration should be assigned to the area. Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Vanderwood seconded to forward ZOA 5-86 to City Council with a recommendation for denial. Motion carried x' by majority vote of Commissioners present. Commissioner Newman abstained. • RECESS 9:32 PM ,.;. RECONVENE 9:45 PM 5.4 SIGs CODE EXCEPTION SCE 9--56 CROW/SPEIKER/HOSFORD NPO # 3 v` Request for a Sign Code Exception to allow for the expansion of one free standing sign and the ability to modify a second sign of three free standing signs which previously received Sign Exception approval (SCE 1-85) on property zoned C-G. (Commercial General). Located: SW Garden Place (WC1 1 2S1. 1135 lot 400, 1400, and 1600). { '; Senior Planner Liden reviewed the previous approval and explained that this 'proposal would - increase the size of the sign on Hall Blvd. to the same size as the one on SW Pacific Highway. Also, they would like the ability to add a reader board to the sign located on Highway 217, if necessary. APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION o Randy tlawhirter, 9350 SW Tigard, Luminite Sign, explained that his client was still having difficulty with people finding their location. He stated that the message sign for 217 is something -they are anticipating, however, it may not happen. They would not be in:reas ing the size of the sign on :, Highway 217 if they decide tc. make this change. o Discussion followed regarding location and what the signs would look like. me d PUBLIC TESTIMONY o No one appeared to speak • PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED te o The majority of the Commissioners supported the proposal. Coamissioner Newman was concerned that the reader board sign location on Highway 217 would cause a visual distraction as it is located where the traffic merges onto 217 from Pacific Highway. Commissioner Fyre moved and Commissioner Vanderwood seconded to approVp, the SCE 9--R6 as submitted. Motion carried by Majority vote of ;. x ..�' Commissioners present. Commissioner Newman voting no. I. - .>.._ PLANNING COrif.lISSION MINUTES AUGUST 19, 1986 -- PAGE .4 • • � "i; AGENDA ITEM 5.3 PLANNING COMtlISSION August 3.9, 1986 MEMO TO: Planning Commission .� . FROM: Keith Liden Senior Planner RE: ZOA 5-46 for Ernest and Barbara Marx A. FACTS 1 General Information CASE: Zone Ordinance Amendmen t ZOA 5-96 REQUEST: To allow { d, 4 public agency administrative services; lodge, fraternal and cAiic assembly; general retail sales (limited to bulky t merchandise such as furniture and large appliances); and personal services, general as permitted uses in the I-P (Industrial Park) zone. APPLICANT: Ernest and Barbara Marx 13627 Sunset Blvd Pacific Palisades, CA 90272 1 2`. Background The I-P (Industrial Park) zone was adopted by the City in November, 1983. One amendment of this zone occurred in 1998, resulting in the list of permitted and conditional uses contained in the applicant's narrative.. 3. Proposal Description 1 q The applicant is proposing that several additional uses be allowed in the • I—P zone. The contention is that these use are consistent with the intent of the zone and compatible with or similar to other allowed uses. Listed ao below are the proposed uses to be added, the Community Development Code definitions, and the zones in which these use are presently allowed. Public Administrative Agency Refer s to public service providers, record keg�ng. , clerical, � . or public contact services that deal directly with the citizen, together with incidental storage and maintenance of necessary vehicles, and excludes commercial use type,ype "Professional and Administrative ..: Services ' • ;' Typical use types are associated with , governmental offices. . (Permitted C-N, C--G, C—P, and CBD zones.) ?CAA 5-86 (Earnest & Barbara Marx) — Page 1 p e ° Lodge, Fraternal, and Civic Assembly Refers to meetings and activities g primarily conducted for the members . s. of a , Particular group, Excluded from this use type are uses classified as group residential, group care, and transient lodging v (all types). n meeti Typical uses include a . Typical meeting places for civic clubs, lodges, or fraternal or veterans organizations (Permitted C--G, C-P, CBD zones, conditional R--12, R-'25, R-40, and C-4.! zones.) ;. :z General Retail Sales '•a Refers to the sale or rental of commonly used goods, and merchandise for personal or household use, but excludes those classified as Agricultural Sales, Animal Sales and Services, Automotive and Equipment, Business Equipment Sales and Services, Construction Sales and Services, Food and Beverage Retail Sales, and Vehicle Fuel Sales. Typical uses include department stores, apparel stores, furniture stores, pet stores, or book stores. (Permitted C-G, CBD zones, permitted with 20% limit on total floor e area of a project C-P and I-P zones.) • Personal Services Facilities :: Refers to the establishments primarily engaged in the provision of e informational, instructional, personal improvement, and similar ° -' services of nonprofessional nature but excludes services classified . under Spectator Sports and Entertainment Facilities, Participant Sorts and Recreation, or Transient Lodging. . p g g. typical uses include photography studios, driving schools and trade schools or reducing '. salons. 4,.. (Permitted C-G, C--P, CBD zones, • t permitted wit h 20% limit on total floor area of a project I-P zone.) 4. emEi ey_& JPO Comments x.: The Engineering and Building Inspection Division have no objection to the request. r. NPO 1# 1 and 4 have recommended against the proposal No other comments have been received. ee t; B. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS Section 18.30.120 of the Community Development Code states that ordinance amendments shall be consistent with Statewide Planning Goals, federal and state statutes, applicable plans adopted by Metro, applicable Comprehensive Plan policies, and relevant ordinances. No Plan policies apply directly to this application and none of the other items mentioned above would be in conflict with this request. The purpose statement for '. the I-P zone and a comparison with the other uses p presently allowed in the .. reviewing zone provide the most suitable guidance for g this proposal. The relevant purpose statements in Section 18.68.010 (a) of the Code are subsections (1), (2), and (4) which are stated below: 1,` ZOA 5-86 --86 (Earnest w Barbara Marx) Page 2 • 4" • 4 _ ---_ ,. ■■• ■ R1. , (1) For combining light manufacturing, office and complementary related commercial use e.g. , restaurant, barber shop, beauty salons and fitness centers; ti i(2) For combining uses which have no off—site impacts n terms of noise, 4 : odor, glare, lights, vibration, smoke, dust, or other types of ' off—site impacts; •Ad (4) Which prohibit residential uses • :. . Public Agency Administrative Services are consistent with the above purpose statements and this use is similar to other categories permitted in the I--P zone such as financial, insurance and real estate services; professional and administration services; and research services. Public agencies and utility companies would be well suited for the I—P zone, particularly when vehicle and equipment storage is necessary. Lodge, fraternal, and civic assembly meets the above purpose statements and it should be noted that this is not a residential use. there are no _.- similar uses presently allowed in the I—P zone. General retail for bulky merchandise is presently permitted in the. I-P ;;. 4 zone if it does not exceed 20% of the total square foot of a development. ;. The sale of bulky merchandise involves more extensive storage requirements than other commercial retail establishments. Also, the traffic generation r of these uses is less than most retail uses as reflected by the, parking requirement in the Code for one space for every 1,000 square feet of floor area. The Planning staff does not object to the presence of bulky merchandise sales in the I—P zone, however, clear criteria should be formulated to strictly limit this use to bulky merchandise only and to avoid the -. establishment of businesses which sell a variety of large and small r, merchandise. Personal services, general are presently allowed on a similar basis as general retail sales. This category is consistent with the purpose statement for the I-P zone and the use appears to be compatible with the intent of the zone. Since the present vocational training center located - on the property owned by the applicant occupies more than 20% of the total floor area, it is considered as a non—conforming use. C. RECOMMENDATION The Planning staff recommends approval of the above proposal to allow public agency administrative services; lodge, fraternal, and civic OM assembly; and personal services, general as permitted Uses in the I-P t zone. The sale of bulky merchandise is also appears appropriate., provided 5 that clear definitions and/or criteria are established to prohibit variety stores which are only partially devoted to the sale of such merchandise. The staff will be prepared at the hearing to discuss possible methods for enforcement of this distinction between the two types of general retail sales. dj/119 t 4. ZOA 5-86 (Earnest C. Barbara Marx) Page 3 de C cr. 4 REQUESTS FOR cottlE Is 0, , t., TO: as.it 9d1f/E-iilf4e :.1 . of . ATE h �!s lift's Jo 2 S6 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: Z0A 5-86 Se,uest b Ernest 6 Barbara Marx'for a Zone Ordinance Amendment •• to Ttle 8 of tie T g rd Municipal. Cod to allow public agency administration services; 'lodge, fraternal, and civic assembly; general retail sales (limited to bulk merchandise such as furniture & large appliances); and personal servrices,, general as permitted uses in t e IP Industrie Par zone Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be ,- '. re proposal in the near future. t- ..: P paao^ and a decas�on this bapplication,®a+�etneeci r��a"� a'�ai If you wish to comment on your comments by w .?�u e ist 19 86 You may use the space provided below or attach a , separate letter to return your com mmerits. Ii" y®u are unable to res„ r®o d b _,the Ab+ aye date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments is ar confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any ;- questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, P.O. So* 23397, Burnham and'Ash Ave., Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171, STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden { PLEASE CHECK. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments; t1/4( NI/lb() • i. 4•e be• .r 114. . r+r: fir. Aim I Name of Person Commenting: Phone No 1 (KSL:pm/0356P)/0356P) TS FOR C( EPJTS•74 To: ,�i(�:�.d j "e: i t DATE: FRB : Tigard Planning Depart en RE ZOA 5-86 " Re ueat b Ernest & Barbara Maxi for . Zone Ordinance A ndment to Title 18 of the Tigard nici►al Code to allow public agency admtnistrati:an services; lodge, fraternal, and civic assembly, general retail sales (limited. to bulk merchandise such as furniture & large appliances); and personal services general as permitted uses in the IP Industria Par zone. Attached is the sits Plan and applicant's statement for Your review. From 4. information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other } information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future♦ If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by � .._ ' You may use the space provided below or attach a :. 1st 19 R6 �: separate letter torn your comments. If ou are tInable to res nd b the , bove dates please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, the Tigard'gard' Planning Department, P.O. contact ntact Box 23397, Burnham and`Ash Ave. , Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING .ITEMS THAT APPLY We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments • • { A Name of Person Commenting:_ • �/rl,`,., Phone No • (KSL._ pm/C356P) .. . . - - . , (5) ''''' Cer Alf . ovis, REQUESTS FOR COS!°n%E r • . if 7�'i3: ' lit," ,-. '; _, ATE. Y3, l98b FROM: Tigard Planning Department ;. RE, 5-86 Request by Ernest'6 Barbaraa. Marx for .a Zone: Ordinance Amendment to Title 18 of the Ti a d funi.ipa1 Code to allow public ,agency admi.nistr.at i.orn �. 1 ' services; lodge., fraternal, and civic assembly; general retail sale's (limited to °- bulk .. 'merchandise such as furniture & large appliances); and per;wnai 'srr•v .ces,[ general as permitted uses in t e iP dustri7e Aa zone Attached is. the Site` Plan and appliicantbs statement for your. review, From 'f ..,. information supplied by various departments and agencies and frost): other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal' in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your' comments by ila4e p u.t 1st b9 86 You use the s • '. may pang provided below or attach a separate letter to return your cornmerits. gitou are tirtable to. rind b, he e____ te, please phone the staff contact. noted below with your eommonts and • •• confirm y our comments in writing as soon as p ossible, Tf' you have ary. questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department; P.O. Box 23397, Burnham a .Ash Ave.. Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. v. STAFF., TACT: Keith Idan • PLLASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it, Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. • Written comments: F _ , if / w �" .try.,. . .,�ir� :..-.�. .�r...., /' :4''' '1.e II' i Air ° tilr-C'Ir'''----'g'i''V''''' ejL") ei ., . ...A._%_1,_:—"/ 04.P /...e. „J?-ie; , # Name of Person Gommentin : ...A,(29 Phone No. ...� _ U (KSL:pis/0356P • 4,- J .-../ a - --.. ...-.... ..-_'.,.:-" .-...:,".-,.'°'.':,",:. .. :,..1' "-,,+.*.: ,„ v ' ' 7: ',, - '' ''' , 9„ .., .i. .,,,i,,, ,,,,,.„, „ „. , ,,- ,..,i,-,,, , , ,- . .- . r „. . „„ , . . . . ''. • •" . . ''' ' ' 0 ' . ' '° ',, ...„.9.:65, „,,,:, ,,,,:,, , .., .,. . -, _ „,,, „ ,. ..,, . ,a � w ' ,,,,y,�,.w,.�,r-+.rw?.. r_.\,•...w,.r--a=+.L,•=--.a.�;. .v....,r+*•++. ._.*.'♦•-r• a u _ ..„M,.a..w.•P.—r.i.,.,w.�a..,..,.«..N,. '....-u.-ww'«+.,.,,•w,z.s �, ,re»4+++n^^ ,� ' ' •y.. a' A �r �� ,1 r10- ?a�- a • M r. .. - --,------'•--• ,.. ;'' -,/,...4,&44."..---- - " ' .,.,,,p.,,, .: ..,,, ,: ' di. ,'-'. A, .49.).- . ., " ''' ,—i.,, - _,a/if . ... - ' ti ,,e1#1..... ? '''' -" 'rgr- '- ......;.'' .,.j(4"' „,.-1.-f-------`-'---- :. - *••.»,.'^•*^ate. r \ f s , ,:�. -; '; . : s � - ..o, n- A.r an••• . r. ..+».. r „.v-, -..<:�w ;....♦.�.--.,.—r.•4.w. '•M-w, f�Y w.-.+.i-«i' .w.-.«+Ln a • J6 �, a.. n-,.a .9..«�rY^•^".'♦`e^^•'r"....'-arm....• a ^ 5!� � ar 5 F,t rYr 5 . rte-+ N . � , a.•x.--er..,.•..........._.-.•+r.-a♦,•••••--•.,>'..�...-:+-+. k b F r�. �,E i�",. 'i, } f' L• t -i-1.';”, ,S,a- ' A rrwTa rt.Fy�a., . P i t1 . _ . 410 .. , .- R UES r. FOR COMMENTS 7.y f, " TO • j...It July 23,_. 1986 = ®BTF: FROM Tigard Planning Department , Amendment .. R€. Z®A S 86 'ate uest � ��rnest & Barbara Marx for a Zone Ordinance Am �'/ _ a to Title 18 of the Tigard Municipal Code to allow public agency administration services; lodge, fraternal, and civic assembly, general retail sales (limited to bulk- merchandise such as furniture & large appliances); and personal services, l general as permitted uses in the IP Iudustria Par zone. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From -- information supplied by various departments and agencies . and from other • - information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be ,: ay prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by August e 1st 19 86 You may use the space provided below or attach a •..• separate letter to return your comments. I ( are unable t2 respond by the: above dat,a please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and :- confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any ,• . ;,-, questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department. P.O. , Box 23397, Burnham arid`Ash Ave. Tigard, OR 97223. Phone: 639-4171. '�. *` % STAFF CONTACT: Keith Liden ' PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY • —'' We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Y • ':_:_ Please contact _ of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments: • t.p _ _ - - ... .sue w.•..»r:. 7:. is V��q tai Name of . e rson Commen i g.N .: �►._. , /�4 . �; ,. Phone No. . , (KSL;pm/0356P) • . n. REQL ES TS: FO _MEN 1 R-':+: gri(fillr TG. GA ,Ittl� FROM Tigard P arming 'tepar~tcnerrt = ..: • ZOA 5-86 Request b Ernest & Barbara Marx for a Zone Ordinance Amendment Title, of the Tigard ILn cipal Code to allow .Public agency adesinis tiara f - e fraternal, and civic assembly, general retail ,sales (1i! ted to .-:..... merchandi DICE USE ONLY NOTICE OF PROPOSED ACTT' LCDC FILE f 1 TO: DEPARThDiT OF LAND CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT 1175 Court Street N.E. Salem, Oregon 97310-0590 Action: (Check all that apP1y Comprehensive Land Use New Land Use Plan Amendment xx Regulation Amendment Regulation aasmarnmazas DATE: Jules 2 2§.§ •Cat or C�un FROM: Cit of Tip and Y tY • LOCAL Fi ZOA 5-86 DATE SET FOR FINAL NEARING ON ADOPTION: days prior 6 Vie final hearing® (Mote:` Notice must be received in Sales a east z. This date must be provided when filed at DLCD because provisions for comments are tied to the date of final hearing). a TIME AND PLACE FOR HIRING: Ii acrd civic c �r . ' 13125 SW Hall Blvd., (1) SUM AND PURPOSE OF PROPOSED ACTION • kequest by Ernest & Barbara Marx for a Zone Ordinance Amendment to Title 1E of the Tigard Municipal Code to allow public agency administration services; lodge, fraternal, and civic assembly; general retail sales (limited to bulky merchandise such as furs niture & large appliances); and personal services, general as J,- permitted uses in the IP (Industrial Park) zone. • °'- a. Size of Affected Area: cc bm Location n of Affected Area: " o, CD (2) List Statew dd dal s wh i c_ aopl the prouos CO (3) List a state or federal Vinci es, local averment or local soeci al service st cts whtc i n or` acts b the rifiaTajl. w _ Address:.:i.�� DDirect questions and C®nments to:m Keith li:den (Phone)639�a178�,, Tigard Civic Center --737 673-agtrinmitrar".--- • 620661g8z _ - r _ . • . '. ,.y . .yam , •.a'-i e r aY, , , . , 4. , :.,, . 0 , •.„. ., . , 1 , , ,. . EST Le MARX 11777 SAN VICENTE IFIQg1LEVAlt0,•SUITE 750 • LOS ANGELES..C1':LIFORMA 900449 • July 14, 1986 M . Keith Liden Senior Planner ' C4 miiiun3.ty Development Dept. 13125 S W. Hall Blvd. P.O. Box 23397 Tigard OR 97223 `;. Re: 10500-20 S.W Cascade B;Lvd. Tigard , Dear Mr. L,iden: Enclosed herewith, is completed application for Zone Ordinance ,' Amendment, together with check for $ 300 filing fee. ,. Thank you for expediting this matter. . Very truly yours, ' 41,,,Liz'sic 2 Ernest L. Marx Encl. cc: Charles Cota ELM:11 r; Afte!' Narrative to bequest by Ernest L. Marx and Barbara R. Marx, Owners for Zone Ordinance Amendment, regarding Taz Lots 3302 and 3303, Tax Map 1SX35BA. The subject property is improved with a 32,000 sq.ft. tilt-pup concrete building. The northerly 16,000 sq.ft. known as 10500 S.W. Cascade Boulevard is currently leased to the California Human Development Corporation. This federally ': �•; funded company trains personnel, including minority groups, % to work in various industries. The southerly 16,000 sq.fte - ; known as 10520 S.W. Cascade Boulevard is leased to National Appliance Company. National Appliance Company (N.APCC) used ,.. the space for storage. NAPCO recently relocated to a large ° building in Tualatin and vacated the subject space, Which is currently available for lease. There are currently 60 *. ° parking spaces on the sited ,` : As indicated on the enclosed map, Power Rents is located adjacent to the subject property. A, high tech/light industrial/office building was recently constructed across the street from subject property. Toys°-fit-Us and Levitz Furniture are located a few hundred feet north of subject t 8r property on S,W. Cascade Boulevard. The zoning of Toys m-R-Us and Levitz was changed 2rom IP-Industrial Park to CG Commercial General. In 1985, the zone of the property`owned by NAPCO at the southwest corner of S.W. Cascade Boulevard and S.W. Greenburg Road was changed from IP-Industrial Park to CG Commercial General. It is believed that these zone Changes were justified, because the nearby Washington Square Shopping Center caused the transition of use of properties along S.W. Cascade Boulevard from rail-served industrial buildings to the higher and better commercial uses, such as Toys-R-Us, Levitz and the high tech/office project. The current zone of the subject property is IP (Industrial " 12 Park District). Uses permitted in this zone are listed on the enclosed Exhibit "B" Section 1S.68.030 of the City of Tigard Zoning Ordinance. After comparing the enclosed City of Tigard IP, Industrial an Park and CG Commercial General zoning codes, it is requested that the current IP zone be amended by a Zone Ordinance .. - Amendment to allow the following uses from the CG zone. • i • • 4 „.. ' 0 4, .. . . .� . ,. Section 18.62.030 permitted uses in C-G district (see enclosed copy of C-G ordinance) 1. Civic Use Types ` 4 : A. Public agency administrative services D. Lodge, fraternal and civic assembly a 2. Commercial Use Types L. General retail sales (limit to retail sales of bulky merchandise, including furniture and large appliances) 0. Personal services, general ; Regarding civic use types mentioned above, public administra- tive agency refers to public service providers, record keeping, clerical or public contact services that deal directly with the citizen, together with the incidental storage and maintenance of necessary vehicles, and excludes rl 4 commercial use type, "professional and administrative services" . Typical use types are associated with governmental 4 offices. a _ Lodge, fraternal and civic assembly refers to meetings and activities primarily conducted for the members of a particular 4: group. Excluded from this use type are uses classified as group residential, group care and transient lodging (all types) . Typical uses include meeting places for civic clubs, lodges or fraternal or veterans organizations. -1 't These uses are considered to be similar to the following ♦ .. : uses from the IP code, section 18.68.030. (1) Civic Use Types A. Public support facilities A. C. Postal services D. Public safety services -. 4 Including these civic type uses in the IP Zone will allow utilization of larger industrial type buildings which are m often more suitable in space and cost for use by public ;, agencies and fraternal lodges. These industrial type buildings will generally include economical storage space for these civic use types. Industrial buildings will be j more likely to have the space for incidental storage and maintenance of public administrative agency vehicles. Uses =- such as water district and phone companys will require facilities to store equipment. . .- - . iCiAll -/ tr ■ 0 - ' - a ' - General retail sales refers to the sale or rental of commonly ''s used goods and merchandise for personal or household use, but excludes those classified as agricultural sales, animal w: ° sales and services, automotive and equipment, business - F. equipment sales and services, construction sales and services, food and beverage retail sales, and vehicle fuel sales. Typical uses include department stores, apparel stores, z furniture stores, pet stores or book stores. z.. It is requested that the IP zoning ordinance be amended to - allow general retail sales of bulky merchandise, includi .:.,;-•,s. .._..,, , .:., Kam„ 41) ♦ It is believed that the personal service use is compatible with public administrative agency uses and lodged fraternal and civic assembly uses. Driving schools and trade schools require the larger spaces offered in the IP zone and are considered to be compatible uses with many of the uses permitted in the IP zone. '•:a • ` ' An-example of a trade type pe school allowed in the IP zone is b the California Human Development Center located at 10520 S.W. Cascade Boulevard. This federally funded corporation trains personnel, including minority groups, to work in various industries. IP zoned land and industrial type buildings are more feasible =- and usable for these uses than more expensive buildings on more expensive CG land. Section 18.68.010 of the City of Tigard zoning ordinance stipulates in part that the purpose of the I®P zoning °'�� district is to provide areas PA (1) For combining light manufacturing, office and complementary " °... related commercial uses, e.g. restaurant, barber shop, beauty salons and fitness centers® (6) Which provide for a circulation system that provides ,. direct access to arterials or collectors that will not r channel traffic through residential areas. Section 18.62.010 of the City of Tigard zoning ordinance stipulates that the purpose of the C-G areas is to provide for major retail goods and services. (i) The uses classified as general commercial may involve drive-in services, large space users, a combination of retail, service, wholesale and repair services or provide services to the traveling public. ms p (3) It is intended that these uses be adjacent to an arterial or major collector street° The foregoing excerpts from the I-®P and C-G zoning ordinance were repeated to show the similarities of the purposes of MU each zone regarding permitting retail uses, large space uses and location adjacent to an arterial or major collector street. { In summary, it is requested that the I.P . zoning ordinance be amended to allow as additional uses the following uses • ' allowed in the C-G zone stipulated in Section 18.62.030 of the City of Tigard zoning ordinance. 4 f4JO ,. 4 z 4 � .. Civic Use Types As' Public agency administrative services D. Lodge, fraternal and civic assembly Na" T Types ee 'Com mer'cial rc .al uee ssener retail sales (limit to,retail retai l sales of L. bulky merchandise. including furniture, and large appliances)• 0. Personal services, general. r ' It is , further c nested that the defin tion of general` a les be broken into two categories separating'the - retail �.xances�e sale of 'bulky xr erchandis a such asp furniture and,'app ' .,,,...._'*.. which are r ueste o be al coved in tie X zone from a zs�ue a ..: . remainiri� types general retail sales allo,iedl in t e mg/CDC/3a59- a • a 2 qtr - _ a��th."" + d ' ' A SH gNG `TON rI al s IA . 1 :. I liii: . . IP! I11 #r/1I \t& ' ._ .t'.'''..'..:1.. :, '. ' :4IP.. flb ' Cs.te '. \ . ''' . . diiiiiiiiIIII arerilli.11igi :-..• •. . . .. . ... . 1 ®�am-r. ®I®®®11, '.. 27 ma e .,,„ .. _ ......., . - - :- =-- 17: r' ' j_,-- 1 1 - 111111. 1, , ..,,.., , ,. :....., ,,,00...y.dorirt)iri,;ii,04 iiii‘.., . 4: 7..,:i.. —D—I''' — Ilt1M1111111Lsii..it .:- ... .,,:,..--.,.,., . . ,....t„,,, , ,:,,,,. .6,tefirt, _ A .4.41 I I I lbh w r*/. : . .; :? 'tAttr, 411 a 1 - ,. . A,21- vc-i /ilia =I ,,:fir ' '''.- ' iiiiiii*4 . , ,.. . ....... ..,4 , koolf,.., ., . -, am. / , -,„,,,..,, . . .. --. ., % 8,. 0 ir, ' i ... e r . a ,a • iip, , '''.::■. , 440041 � 1 s ....deimilah :' ' - r.- '' 111 C .ditii . . : . ,,,�, .alum\ _ . - • -•11•1 - ....- -., „ i . , .. . . _, .,:..1, .'.. Mil at . o 5.04 I. :, ... - MI i . . I .° .•a irk!lirL iiir41:111, :. Illll . .111., ‘a . • - - palm ‘,.4,,,, . sz iT® 11I Es......,, a % , . . ,7 ,R, . • • .„„,,,, -jmut, Liu, . ' - w a'. 4 • a *elm ill . 11111111rit l ! ,� - ri MI . ...lb to,.. .. NI [1110 1 ' III_ . • ° 3TREILT ' ■fer. I . a v, ;741 isilmailliRoti,.2.- . is, 47:41•4 g ... . . . _ ' amilimino • MIMI a It,,.11, . w ,, A, Ni■ . limIrws tiallita iirrms imi , ,- -_,..,:..., .,I, . Amilim al as ;wow . bib• 11114 OMNI illogerr_,.40 -11111011, .31 .‘,...,. :-..,..• giRimm 1111.4. wooll11,1111111101111. .iiiiiit-Adrk.limill is . . .„.._.--.:,:. ..., vv,...;."!11. - I" illj ' c �` �� • Illiptlillii • s ';',;,...1: : . lowiliire......... _ _. - .� � ••:;_ r. .i a ., 4 � '. +�. • e x , .r i, -;. . , „ .. , tt. , . ._ 502 .„. -01,1 20. 21 . ;-,. . 23 Pa kb e afi' 27, :., b .Oh Vill4V..,... : ary4t .1X • .. 11:c r. I/0/11 a �►-T yy� i ® "q I A ill T .3lp1'i - . • ' n‘ 3300 •e -` jtfe 3C5 he :i1 ' e ;I. p� ' . `i w a t onoFet � 0,..' . . , ® e•I esa' ~. ! J • fI I 1. 3]r! ft{ri S — s t I �' ..i. c).. - X1$,1-57 "... �I T .. key a x a 700 e, �, p ' /3.it. 0.19 Jo ° IGYAt. \ \ Atlii? I'! n o A Q q - - S4r )47. \�\ Is A3HL3i�Ql'it e a -. , 1 t 3S OM /s* r r Imo. \ \ . " #4_. Ipatt�a AM. ,.. r 46 1 I( c- -1�. - L P:Al a h e a - mi N ��_^ � t .., ., .:. ..: ,. .. ..Og9 0 0010:! _:-,•.. L w. I . 11C° ac .60 4_ / / 3 ors ac .:so As a etc. 141.4e �- t' I /,23:i I ' cAttviric-o ' !. '':"' tea`+ a Mo^ r w 7rsA� 6 f� 9 ,t8 �i'l�l��• \• c • 24*cc .y Y 09... E ` ■ s ° fri)pl s w 'i I. ••d CO " -�.�'__1._..__ ♦� ••, �` CASCADE t�a.n _ m , ". :TWO s S i0r .1 - w a - e, lei a. 0 0 rag. -•, _g 0l p g '''''....---8,10, i. _, ' • ,.-l'as d' Y• -y.- ®4640 , i -." 700 \ 0 _ .,,,�° $ 1. 61:113 0 I S y SEE MAP P • ,� % I l0 TbT1��- ii `d. 15 I _ ,� I + o l 87461 ®C0'Oa 4 06{660 L ....Y y E -„ ,. >e+ay.v...r.•o..,..w-,. «....,:..:• „..$...:,�,,.„�.,,.:...,. ..,v.•,...•'Rtt. ..».+.,:,.,,, : .'..i..n.rs+x.'+•+.J,'Y.+sxeid`F•.q... rw'r. x4, 9 \1 5 I • • to � �e I�a •_', _' EXHIBIT g 19 a 6s..030 Permitted uses. permitted uses in the 1-P district are as fellows: (1) civic Use Types. (A) Publ4c support facilities; (g) Parking services; (C) Postal services; (0) Public safety services. (2) Commercial Use Types (A) Animal sales and services: (1) Veterinar°y, small and large animals;, (8) Automobile and equipment: (i) Repairs. light, (ii) Sales and rental, light equipment; (C) Building maintenance services: (0) Business equipment sales and services; (E) Business support services; (F) cowisunication services; (G) Construction sales and services; ...: (H) Financial, insurance and real estate services; (I) Laundry,services (J) Medical and-dental services; (K) Participation sports and recreation: (i) Indoor, (ii) Outdoor s• (I) Professional and administrative offices `'t";"': (M) Research services; (E ) Vehicle fuel sales; `. (0) The following arises, separately or in combination, shall not exceed a total of 20% of the entire square footage within the 'development complex (i) Convenience sales and personal services, (ii) Day care facilities, (iii) Eating and drinking establishments, (iv) Personal services facilities (v) Retail sales, general. (3) Industrial Use Type. (A) Manufacturing of finished products (B) Packaging and processing; (C) Wholesaale, storage and distribution; (i) Miniwarehouse, (ii) Light. OM (4) Farming 6, (5) Home Occupation 1®.63 040 0e90011116Ail uses : in the F-P district are as follows: (1) Heliports.1 Hel i :rts. in accordance with the Aeronautics Division (000T) and the FAA; f,.x (2) Utilities. 1302P/dmj • r a 4• ' ti d' S i a ` w. . o • 18.62. GENERAL EflC!A STRG�' •, 3 a 1 . 62.4(1 pur,mpla The purpose of the Gnoz�"al Commercial bras is to provide for ; major retail goods area services. • ;,,t. (1) : The uses classified as * general. c erciasl. . may . involve 4 .* drive-in servicas large Spaage users,, a COMB .nastio of retail, service, holesale and re ►ai.r •services or provide " se ices to the traveling public, ;.- d. (2) 'The uses range from autosaobile rep it and services, supply and essiai.soinerit stores, vahic1e sales, drive-in restaurants to laundry establishments. (3) It is intended that these uses be adjaacat+t to atn arterial • or major collector street. 1 62 020 Procedures and Approval Process st A use permitted outright. Section 16.62.030, is as use which • requires no approval under the provisions of this. code. If as use is not listed as a use permitted outright, it aaay be held to be a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Chapter 18.43 (UNLISTED USES). (b) A conditional use, Section 16.62.040, is a use the approval of which is discretionary with the Hearings Officer. The approval ,.: ;. approval are set forth in Chapter a; , process and criteria for. aP °.a: 18.130, (C0 10ITIt AL 'USES). If a use is not listed, as a conditional use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Chapter 10.43 (UNLISTED USES). 4 1 2.030 Permitted Uses • �.A Permitted Uses in the district are as follows: ,. (1) Civic Use Types • .(A) Public agency administrative services ot (8) Cultural exhibits and library services (C) Public support facilities —' t tWt4).L - 1(0) Lodge, fr•aterrtal anti civic aassambl,t (E) Parking services (f +Nst4, \u •`i e ' (F) Postal services 1;) ‘ deg'.•+s_ (C) Public safety facilities ') ‘ r . � (2) Commercial Use Types (A) agricultural Sales (8) Amisement enterprisQs o , (C) Animal sales and services ` ` ,' ''' ( (i) Groomi (i i) Vatarinaary: small animals °� (iii) Sales/Rentals, Light Equipment; III 101 i ,. 44(4 ... A •. .a . , ''„, . ,/ * dip{4 .l a e 4114 (0) Automotive and asquipmant S +'k �� (i) Cleaning (ii) Repairs: light equipment (E) Business support services Q sil ikQ% . (F) Convenient sales sane! personal services Lehi '\ Bn � T 114y• `" (G) Day Care Facilities (H) Eating and drinking establishments (I) Financial, insurance and real estate services ,(3) Food and beverage retail sales (K) Funeral and interment services: (i) Cremating '.., (ii) Undertaking (1) General retail sales (ii) Medical and dental services l Participation s ( ) Partici Pa sports and recreation: Vtlik$OV V�3:,5e. (i) Indoor (ii) Outdoor N.(0) Personal services: general ':. ..(P) Professional and administrative `services JI;...;h4v‘AN(10 ,(5, (Q) Consumer Repair services. (R) Religous Assembly (S) Spectator sports and entertainment facilities (T) Transient lodging µ: (3) Home Occupations subject to provisions of Chapter 18.142. 18.62.040 Co onal Use Section Conditional Uses in the C—C district are as follows: (1) Adult Entertainment (2) Automotive and equipment (A) Fleet storage 4.. (B) Sales/Rental: farm equipment (C) Sales/Rental: heavy equipment (0) Sales/Rental: light equipment (E) Storage: recreational vehicles and boats Y (3) Wholesaling, storage and distribution (t. + ,,0 +' ''Z•Q (A) Mini-warehouses ,.-e. t4) Utilities (5) Heliports, in accordance with the Aeronautics Divisions (000T) and the FAA t ' (6) Hospitals (7) Spectator sport facilities (8) Vehicle,fuel sales ( 1%.,:' ' 1043: 1 II - '102 itme/id . . 19.62,050 Dimensional Re•uir rentaQ (( Dimensional Requirements in the diet rct e►ra as f°ll°Ws: (1) There is no minimum lot area required. (2) The average minimum lot width shill be SO feet. (3) The minimum setback requirement* are ages follawas; -. (A) There shall be no minimum front yard setback requirement, however, conditions in Section 18.102 "Visual Clearance Areas', and Section 19.100 "Londscaping and Screening" must be met. (8) on corner lots and through lots, there shall be no minimum setback requirement, however, the provisions of Chapter 19.102 (VISUAL CLEARANCE) must be satisfied • (C) No side yard setback shall be required, except 20 feet a.:. shall be required where the zone abuts residential zoning district. (D) No rear yard setback shall ke required, except 20 feet shall be required where the C-G zone abuts a residential zoning district. (4) Except as otherwise O Exce P provided in Chapter 15,95 (®UILDTNG .. HEIGHT LIMITATIONS) no building in a C-G;zone shall excr2ed 45 feet (5) The maximum site coverage shall be 85 percent including all t. buildings and /Impervious surfaces. (6) The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 15 percent. 4 13.62.060 Additional Rej irament$ Additional Requirements in the C-JG district are as follows; (1) Off-street parking loading, Chapter 18.106 a. Oe (2) Access and Egress, Chapter 18.10+ (3) Landscaping and Screening, Chapter 18.100 m. (4) Signs, Chapter 18.114 Nu (5) Nonconforming Situations, Chapter 13.132 (6) Sensitive Lands, Chapter 16.84 }. TII - 103 /,,,, • * : A .. w ; Cushman Si Wakefield of ®I�inc./Realtars 97204 Avenue,Plated, 972 r .` (503)221-1700 " D. Member `' Senior Mice President Cr f7i' R, Society of Industrial Realtors . .... ...-,,. ... .,w t‘ v\e(4) . Q : -.: .-..- _-_,-,,, . . . . ....,, ,._.- • 1„ ,.,„ \, 4 • * I _..... . . . --... 0 ,. . t " f ....4 s..' M& Z • r �. i •- .\- •i t v i�A� 1. 'A4 \� 4 A t -. - , tS14,45\scu jeAfrk)%/1/4 4i\htkli*ILA .-: , 6J 9 r*.4v4.1. ra...., s3)1%.1x-ko a T , ,,,. ., M. , - 1,34-1/41a" 3art....9., 4,03,40, 14\a„,‘, -ta, .1 ... CAI)4b 14311SZ C?it i A lafak .. It 6 I' Csikbmnk:c....\c)lrirxft.Ltqithfw,-- . . ., b ‘rbvz,6 G %L.,,40 :,, ,. ........ ,,.c) ,(i7-2t0.-i, vil)oirl - _--- .7.4-:_ , ,..- .. .2 ..•.: .., .. ‘V.e(ii)eltw) uz ck."Vasr4.5 . I tot4\- Aits‘N‘I....At.vs. 14% citiR‘A, oc. -Mt; Litztrp9 hiNkb -. ..:, ... .. . ....§ ANI\Orew Ctl-tkcaX 'it' , 4c-ArRAL/D- 4k 'ASA. ,Pc\ks4stt&N.yik..., titA '_-. 0 sS„� - , r Ott 1-‘)., NA ' ■.,.. );XY‘34-4- *34\11,04:444ts.1 4■334.\ ig ‘A (46 •:-:: li,....N.,j\k. ttp.k. ‘417,4st\s\rwis..\(..trolvett‘4411,,wur, .. :4. . , . 4, t .- ' -1 4- .. • -: - ,-' 0 ... I ,, - -:- '...' -.1 -:. '''''' CITYOF TIGARD . . ': . :.:2, -:,,:, WASHINGTON COUNTY. 44, -1 +.,;may. ' q ; ®. i E �y/ =.� �MnpDMq /YNM CHANGE ZONE ORDIN p0 ND NT PWICAp9/ ..: t CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 . .; `. a Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503� 639 4471 FOR STAFF USE ONLY -- k CASE NO ,, . RECEIPT NO. . • APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY:. • DATE: - 1. GENERAL INFORMATION -. Application elements submitted: '' PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 10500 and 10520 S.W. (A) Application form (1) f. Cascade Blvd. , °11.22rd, Oregon: (B) Owner's signature/written TAX NAP AND TAX LOT NO. 1S1 3 5BA Tax 'Lots 3 302 & authorization 3303 (C) Applicant's statement .. SITE SIZE 1. 5 9 Ac.. (15 copies) PROPERTY OWNER/DEED FOLD * tiara Rarx "Trust (D) Filing fee ( Y ADDRESS 13627 Sunset Blvd. PROS -Additional information for Compre , ....::-::::,.*:. Pacific Palisades, C CITY , ZIP 90272 . sive Plan Map Amendments/Zone Changes ' ., APPLICANT* e I int ,. ,.�, (E) Maps indicating property .•- : ADDRESS Sam as Owner PRONE location (15 copies) CITY Sa Wig' ZIP _�(P) List of property owners a;_ *When the owner and the applicant are different within 250 feet (1) . ' people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record (0) Assessor's Pap (1) .M:, or a leases in possession with written authorization (II) Title transfer instrument (1) ':: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written. '; authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or •:: t submit a written authorization with this application. DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: ' L . 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY ' �. owners F The owners of record of the subject property FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: • request a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (if COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: `. applicable) from to and a Zone Change from to .j • a . N.P.O. Number: OR ti Z The applicant requests an amendment to the ' Planning Commission Approval Date: ,e, - following sections of the Comprehensive Plan or Community Development Code Zone Ordinance Amendment City Council Approval Date: (KSL:pm/0737P) J. ' ' ' '' - ' '' ' ' ' ' ' '•'.:‘.- -- ''','. - -,..--, ,::-. :-,-. : --;,,. ' , .C. C a ti, , � � det+�d, 3.. List *ay va riance� o td (aria 1 :ease ' .a�n� cress act ions to .r be .coax .. part of. this :app,1icatioiU r. ��.� picente. . 'Icy: haws � .co���ste .�� 'l ication You will naed ;'to 1t bit art aciitientEi' P de*ribed .a the attached i oa tie sheet at �, the;, tide you 'su it :this 4 .Y , lyp� R1:s�,Co t-,..-,:,,,,...„...,,,,• .-t _ 5. T L cANT(S) S +L • TIFY lT. 'T�►e gbove re ucst aloes not violate d .>s stria i®ems 'tba attached to or i��®eed ,u ©n the ell b ect ro err . . If; the application lication is granted, the applicant �S�.l exercise the. fight �. pp terms B and 'subject to all tb ce uditiono anal i . `�r�nted in accordance with the limitations of tae app f the aibove statements aid the eta tements in the plot plan" ;,..iii,....,..„.:-..„}. attachments, and exhibits traasmit�ed herewith, are true; and the f applicants so nekn®e sdge that am permit issued, based on• thus ,.� app�.i ti®h, say be revoked if it is; found that and sac statements are ,• false. 'x ..''''',:' ' D. The a licant aas read the entire contents of the a splication iu 1uding Pp the policies s and criteria, aaxd understands the requirements for'', approving or denying ttbe applicani®n0 .... saas day of . husband head wife) cif the' subject property e . ::::*1- SIGNATURES ®f aanh ® �r (eg �,.. :. S1 L. • Barbara FL y. 4 (KS . p�/O737P . , . f:. t j a .re S.:',''''''!' 4- _1 ,. ®s 1 , i ' :- r «ii „y,,,.,,yee ti