Loading...
ZOA4-85 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. �_ «-St rw°.a r sfx..�=•+a:-�r+,:�s. ....xtaa.y .•, a r,ah ,ee+�mi...:y'._,. u,,rµ•..a,.�,.�,,.w,:i•a.�.,.,F A„ ., fr'?,:�^3.f s S� �,:�,. ,pw,� s �`sr r � n•r.,+e • ;, �._. .,,. .,..?Fr3. :4 Y"*S,lt; ";,�Ci;.:<'�'v..v�Sxae. ,�2.=l.?d x�,tSe,ur"'F aPh 9..,„ t`4y a r'rrjry�*ab ki�� r'w;•,7 " AZ;�, • a City of Tigard ZOA 4-85 18.132, 18.1.42, 18.136, 18.138,18.'64-" 18.114,, 18.106,, & 18.32.380 . *n, • • • • • • ix • • n•w T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L ' REGULAR MEETING MINUTES -- SEPTEMBER 23, 1985 -- 7:00 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL: Present: Mayor John Cook; Councilors: Tom Brian, and Jerry Edwards City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; Bill Monahan, Community Development Director; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Loreen Wilson, Deputy City Recorder. 2: CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON—AGENDA ITEMS a. City Administrator requested Consent Agenda Items .5 & .9 be pulled for discussion. City Administrator also requested that the following items be considered under Non -Agenda:, .1 MACC Cablecasting Agreement 2 Murray Extension Options Discussion .3 Appointment of Citizen Representative For SW Corridor Study b. Councilor Edwards to requested item .10 be pulled from Consent Agenda for discussion. 3. VISITOR'S AGENDA a. No one appeared to speak. A hk ' 4. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF OREGON a. Mr. Doug Peeples, representing the American Automobile Association k`. (AAA), presented a Pedestrian Safety Citation to the City for the second year with no pedestrian fatalities. 5, �;ORQI1\,(ANCE NO 85. 32. `,AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT` SECTIONS 18.136.020, 18.32;090, 18.142, 18.64, 18.144, 18. 106, 18.99, k. 18.136, 18.44.050, 18.46,050, 18.48.050, ': 18.50.050, 18,52.050, 18.54.050, 18,56.050, 18.58.050, 18.60.050, 18.62.050, 18,64,050; 18.66.050, 18.68 050," 18 70.050, AND 18.72.050 OF THE COMMUNITY' DEVELOPMENT CODE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY' (ZOA 444. 5) a, Community Development Director presented ordinance for Council consideration from 9/9/85 public hearing findings b. Motion by Councilor Brian, seconded by Councilor Edwards to adopt. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present 6. CODES ENFORCEMENT DISCUSSION If a, Community Development Director presented draft of Codes Enforcement ordinance noting the more efficient service process for violators. This code would decriminalize the offenses and set '' Page 1 — COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER , 1985 �Kt • • up a civil hearing procedure, He explained the process and noted the proposed penalties. The Community Development Director suggested that this could be heard by the Municipal 'court Judge or a Hearings Officer. b. City Administrator noted that this change would make, budgetary impacts and should be further studied in this area. c Councilor Edwards suggested the current Hearings Officer could also hear civil infractions. Community. Development Director stated that this was possible from a workload aspect, however, it is a different role and would prefer to have Municipal Court or , ,.. another Hearings Officer hear these complaints. d. Deputy Recorder noted that Municipal Court Judge has concerns regarding impact on current case load, timing, and limitations • regarding possible 'contempt of court'; charges since the infractions are of a civil nature only. Deputy Recorder noted additional concerns from an administrative view and recommended this change be done through a Hearings Officer approach. e. Legal Counsel noted that in other cities the caseload for this same civil infraction process is very low each year with many not i II requiring trial. f. Community Development Director stated this would be scheduled for Council review in the future after time has ` been allowed for .'. further study. 1 :_; 7. PUBLIC HEARING - TEMPORARY USE 5a-85 LARRY SCOVILLE NPO #3 _ '. Request to operate a used car business for a period of one 'year. The applicant will display approximately 4 to 8 vehicles (all 1980 and g newer) on the site. Location: 12885 SW Pacific Hwy, (WCTM 251 2BC, Lot 2101) 1: .. a, Public Hearing Opened 1 b. Community Development Director stated that applicant is requesting a 1 year temporary use permit for a used car business. The t: Planning Director has approved a 2 month temporary use to 10/5/85, c. Public Testimony: Proponents: I. r . Mr. Larry Scoville, representing Columbia Wholesale, 21444 SW 90th Court, Tualatin, submitted a letter of support with copies of [` business tax receipt and picture of location. He stated the intent was to strictly display late model autos for ins p ection and . .' sale, No one would be on the premises on a full time basis for ' sales purposes. .' . Opponents. No one appeared page 2 w COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 23, 1985 , .; -. c A. .. - a wa•,—ti—a.+.. a .. r� � �~M .. .,. ` / 1 ) 1• ,C 1'y•A.�R..1 7 C 1, 1 Y C O U N C I L Rlrl'�I1E.,RR MEE 1'.rNG M:ENU1 ES - SEPTEMBER 9, 1.9135 - 7:00 P.M. 1. ROLL. CAl.i..: Present: Mayor John Cook; Councilors: Torn Briar, (arriving at 7:54 PM), Phil. Edi.n, Jerry Edwards, and ima Scott; City Staff: Bob Jean, City Administrator; Keith Li,den, Senior° Planner; Tim Ramis, Legal Counsel; and Loreen ; Wilson, Deputy City Recorder, 2. CALL TO STAFF AND COUNCIL FOR NON-AGENDA ITEMS a. City Administrator requested following be added . 1 Fanno Creek Park Pedestrian Path Overlay Bid Call 3 . VISITOR'S AGENDA° a. Dave Atkinson, 10460 SW Century Oak Drive, requested Council. • request turn-over of road jurisdiction for Durham Road from County to City. He stated that Summerfield residents are y• prepared to vote down any bond or levy for the MSTIP plan unless the truck restriction can be promised after Durham Road is improved b. Ann & Gary Cseh, 10410 SW Johnson Court, both questioned why •:E ' Council would go to Flying M Ranch for a retreat when money is needed elsewhere in the City. 4. ORDINANCE NO. 85-30 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO` APPROVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT' ,(CGPA m8-�85) AND ZONE CHANGE w, . 9 '85, (DAVIS) AND DECLARI ',,, AN EMERGENCY. syx Second Reading of Ordinance Required From 9/4/85 Meeting. a. Motion by Councilor Edin, seconded by Councilor Edwards to adopt, Approved by 3-1 majority vote of Council present. Councilor Scott voting nay. Ordinance is approved by majority vote after second reading 5. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDME a _ •F'TIGARt Request to review the following chapters°-of the Community Development ,. < Code: 18. 142 Home Occupations; 18.64 CP (Professional/Administrative Office); 18.106 Off-Street Parking, and Loading Requirements; 18,114 Signs; 18.132 Nonconforming Situations; 18.136 Annexations; 18.138 Established Area -- Developing Area Classifications; 18.44.050 R-1; 18.4 6.050 R-2; 18.4 8.050 R-3.5; 18.50.050 R-4.5; 18.52.050 R-7; 18.54.050 R-12; 18.58.050 R-40; 18.60.050 Commercial Neighborhood; 18.62.050 Commercial General; 18.64,050 Commercial Professional,• 18.6 6.050, . I., 18,66,052, and 18.66.054 Central Business District; 18.68.050 Industrial Park; 18.70.050 Industrial Light; 18.72,050 Industrial Heavy; 18.56.050 R-25 a. Public Hearing Opened Page 1 ,. COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 9, 1985 b. Senior Planner noted I'ti.story of request ond: not.ud thzAt. Starr, Planning Commission and c:is r !•'►avo dIfferonco5 of opinion on soinQ recommendations. t c. Public Testimony: t <. Gerald ` Crow, Crow Engineering, requested Council approve staff's recommendation to allow gravel parking areas for special areas, i..e. temporary uses, d. Staff requested direction from Council. ; e. Public Hearing Closed f. ORDINANCE NO. 85-31 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 18,56.050 AND 18.58,050 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND DECLARING AN ; EMERGENCY (ZOA 4--85) r g. Motion by Councilor Scott, seconded by Councilor Ed in to adopt setting minimum setback requirements. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. h. Council discussed other proposed changes with staff and gave direction for preparation of ordinances for the 9/23/85 meeting. j L - 6. PUBLIC HEARING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN' AMENDMENT°'* CPA 3.85 AND ZONE CHANGE ZC 3-85 PORTLAND FIXTURE/S & 3 BUILDERS NPO ## 7 Review on the record of the City Council's denial on April 22, 1985, of a request for approval for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change from CP (Commercial Professional) to CG (Commercial General) fc } a 5.4 acre site, Located: South side of Scholls Ferry Road,' immediately west of Greenway Towne Center, (WCTM` ISI 348C, lot 400) . ' a. Public Hearing Opened t b. Legal Counsel noted that Portland Fixture Company, S & J. Builders, 1 have petitioned LUBA for review of the Council decision of April 'I. 22, 1985 which denied a comprehensive plan amendment and zone change, The Council needs to review the application based upon ! the prior record and the testimony given on the record at this new 1 • hearing. A decision should be made based upon the criteria established in the comprehensive plan. He recommended a tentative ' -- finding be made with direction to staff for preparation of` the , . adoption papers to adopt findings and conclusions, COUNCILOR BRIAN ARRIVED: 7:54 P.M, c. Public Testimony: Appellants 0 Jack Orchard, 1100 One Main Place, Portland, stated that Council needs to address 7 criteria in making a decision and had only addressed 5 at the original hearing. He noted that State Wide I. Planning Goal #12 and Chapter 12, Locational Criteria, must. be • ,. addressed ;. , Page 2 -- COUNCIL MINUTES w- SEPTEMBER 9 1985 f.n+ ».r .•...' .' ...-" ...rya�...—... ., r... Agenda Item 5.3 .0. August 6, 1985 MEMORANDUM BOA 4-85 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON • • TO: Planning Commission July 31, 1985 FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT, Revisions to the Community Development Code is a packet of information which outlines several changes staff • Attached is proposes oses to amend the Community Development Code The proposals include changes to the following Code chapters 18.56 18.58 18.136 18.142 .1 18.64 18.114 18.106 18.48 18.54 18.60 18.6 • 18.68 . • 18.70 18.72 Staff will•ll review each item at the public hearing on August 6, 1985. • • 70A 4-85 -- August 6, 1985 PC MTG -- Page 1 N. q' • • 4 ) 1 Chapter '18.56 and 18.58 f' On May 14, 1985,. the City Council adopt&d Ordinance 84-29 which set:forth setbacks for single family residences, There are instances where property (iwners want to develop property in the R-25 and R-40 zones as single family t .; residences, Currently, : there are no setback standards in the Community ' Development Code for single family residences in the R-25 and R-40 zorres, Staff proposes that the R-12 setback standards- be adopted for the R-25 and i R-40 zones. Those standards are as 'Follows Chapters 18,56 and 18.58 R-25 and R-40 Suggested Single Family Residential setbacks I t I Front Yard For single Family dwellings the front , yard shall be a minimum of 15 feet. 3 ` Corner and Through Lots -- For Single Family ' dwellings units, the minimum setback for each side facing a s ';. street shall be 10 feet, however, the ; provisions of Chapter 18.102 must be [ satisfied. I Side Yard — For Single Family dwellings, the side 4. yard setback shall be 5 feet except this shall not apply to attached units 1 on the lot line on which the units are ; attached. Also, the provisions of Section 18.100.130 (Suf=fer Matrix) l shall be satisfied. Rear Yard - For Single Family dwellings, the rear yard shall be a minimum of 15 feet. o Also, the provisions of Section 18.1.00.130 . (Buffer Matrix) shall be satisfied. Where the side yard or rear yard of attached, multiple family or single family .. °dwellings abut-.. : .. .a more n... . �.— restrictive zoning district, such setbacks shall not be less than 30 feet. 1 The distance between the property line and the front of the garage shall be a minimum of 20 feet. 3 On July 23, 1985, the CCI reviewed the above standards. Although there was f not a quorum present, the CCI seemed to concur with staff that a 20' setback should be required in the front yard to the garage. 1672P x dmi ZOA 4-85 -- August 6, 1985 PC MT6 — Page 2 c Chapter 18, 136 Annexations is Currently, the Community Development Code requires that an application for annexation be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to review by the City Council. In addition to reviewing the annexation ' petition itself, the Planning Commission also recommends the zoning designation on the property` to the City Council. This two hearing requirement means the annexation .application process can take up to three months from application submittal to City Council adoption of the resolution. The Oregon Revised Statutes do not require City Planning Commissions to review annexation petitions. Staff recommends that Chapter 18.136 of the Community Development Code be modified to delete the requirement that annexation petitions be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Staff recommends that the following language be deleted: 18.136.020 "(d) Within 45 days after the closing of the application submittal period, the Commission shall hold a public hearing in accordance with the provisions of 18.32 and based on the standards in 18.36.030 shall make: (1) A recommendation to approve, approve with modifications or deny the requested annexation; and" Staff recommends that Section 18.136.020 (e) be modified to read: "(e)" Within 45 days after the closing of the application submittal period., the Council shall hold a public hearing in accordance with the procedures of 18.32 and shall make a recommendation to the Portland Area Boundary Commission for approval, approval with modifications or denial of the annexation based on the standards ` in 18.32.030. At the same hearing the Council shall assign the development or established area classification as provided by Chapter 18.138, the zoning designation as provided in Chapter 18.32 and, if necessary, the Council shall assign the Comprehensive Plan designation." .�_...: Should the Planning Commission support staff's recommendation, Section 18.32.0909 C and 18.32.090 d in the ( ) ( ) Quasi Judicial. Procedures Chapter will need to be modified to reflect the changes. On July 23, 1985, the CCI members present at the CCI meeting, concurred with staff's recommendations. 1672P dmj . ; OA 4-95 -- August 6, 1995 PC MIG Page 3 • 18.138 Established and Developing Area Classification At the July 23, 1985, CCI meeting, staff reviewed the possibility 'of combining Chapter 18.138 with Chapter 18.136, Annexations. This was suggested by staff to eliminate confusion among applicants for annexation regarding the Established/Developing Area requirement, It was suggested by the CCI members that staff clarify the requirements on the application form and not modify the Code Chapter-s. Staff concurs with this suggestion and will modify the application forms accordingly 1672P dmi ZOA 4--85 — August 6, 1985 PC MTG Page 4 v15F. •x.u.CL 1..A +ryi Ii '. r 18,132 Nonconforming, Uses During the most recent Home Occupation renewal period it became apparent that there are home occupation businesses which were issued permits prior to the adoption of the Community Development Code in 1983' Some of these businesses do not conform to the present code requirements for Home Occupations, These ' businesses are considered nonconforming uses within conforming structures. Staff has reviewed the language in Section 18. 132,040(d)(1) Nonconforming Uses of Structures with the 'City Attorney and determined that the language in that section applies to non conforming Home Occupation business, The language is as follows (d) Nonconformin• Uses of Structures. (1) If a single lawful use contained in a single structure involving that structure or structure and premises in combination (except for a single, accessory structure) existed as of March 16, 1983 would not be allowed in the zoning district in which it is located, or which is nonconforming because of inadequate off-street parking, landscaping, or other deficiency, (under the terms of this ordinance or amendment thereto) the lawful use may be continued so long as it remains otherwise lawful, subject to the following provisions: (A) No existing structure devoted to a use, not permitted by this Code in the zoning district in which it is located shall be enlarged, extended, constructed, reconstructed, moved, or `_ ` structurally altered except to accommodate a changing, of the use of the structure to a use permitted in the zone in which it is f located 1 (B) Any nonconforming use may be extended throughout any existing '` parts of a building which were manifestly arranged or designed for such use at the time of adoption or amendment of this Code, but no such use shall be extended to occupy any land outside such building (C) A change of use for a single use in a single structure, may occur under the following conditions (i) The nonconforming use status was registered with the Planning Director in the manner provided by 18,132.040 (d) (3) for the purpose of establishing the use classification as listed in any of the Permitted Uses subsection of this Code; and (ii) The new use is within the registered Permitted Use i classification; or, (iii) The new use conforms to the zoning ordinance provisions. zOA 4-85 - August 6,` 1985 PC MIG — Page 5 • (0) When a nonconforming use of a structure and premises is discontinued or abandoned for 6 months the structure and premises shall not, thereafter be used except in full conformity with all regulations of the zoning district in which it •is located. For purposes of this Section, a use shall be deemed to be discontinued or abandoned upon the occurrence of the first of any of the following events: . (1) On the date when the structure or premises are vacated, .; i (ii) On the date the use ceases to be actively involved in the .- sale of merchandise or the provision of services, ! (iii)i) On the date of termination of any lease or contract under P. .. which the nonconforming use has occupied the premises, and • (iv) On the date a request for final reading of water and power `• meters is made to to the applicable utility districts; and ' (F) Where a nonconforming use status applies to a structure and premises, removal or destruction of the structure shall eliminate the nonconforming use status of the land, (i) Destruction for the purpose of this subsection is defined as damage to an extent of more than 60% of its current assessed value by the Washington County Assessor. (ii) Any subsequent use shall conform fully to all provisions of the zoning district in which it is located. g r_ . It is the opinion of staff that Chapter 18.132 does not need to be modified to address nonconforming uses for Home occupation businesses, sr i v • • r.• I i, ; ZOA 4-85 . August 6, 1985 PC MIG Page 6 5� � k ss { t I. � i . 18.142 Home Occupations i When the Community Development Code was updated during the Comprehensive Plan 'f; , process in 1983, the Chapter on Home Occupations was modified, The new f requirements for Home Occupation permits requires that all Home Occupation ` issued under the provisions of the Code be renewed annually, The renewal ; provisions however, do not address renewal requirements for Home Occupations j _ which existed prior to the 1983 adoption of the Code. Staff proposes that Chapter 18,142 of the Community Development Code be amended as follows: $' : Add Section 18 142.035 Permit Renewal -- Applicability } , a. Home occu ation l, .- ( ) p permits issued under the Provisions of this code {, shall expire after one year and an application for renewal of the b permit shall be filed with the City to continue lawful operation of !.. the home occupation business. The permit renewal application shall }. be approved or denied in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 18,142,040 of this code. (b.) Home occupation permits which received approval prior to November 1983 but may be nonconforming as defined in Section 18.132,090(d)(1) i shall be renewed annually. The permit renewal application shall be i approved or denied in accordance with the provisions set forth in i ' ,' Section 18.142.040 of this code. (1) Upon approval of the first renewal for Home Occupations which ::.; , are nonconforming as defined in Section 18.132,040(d)(1), the - Director shall set as a condition of approval that the business must be in conformance with the Home Occupation approval rs criteria within 5 years (c.) Home occupation businesses which existed without a valid Home 1. : 7 Occupation permit prior to November 1983 shall apply for a Home 1 ..,- Occupation permit under the provisions of Chapter 18.142. The [ original permit shall be valid for one year and shall be renewed annually under the provisions of Section 18,142.040. On July 23, 1983 the CCI discussed staff's proposed changes to the Home Occupation chapter. The members present concurred with staff and suggested that a time limit be set for nonconforming home occupations to comply with_ applicable code provisions :. • (EAN:pm/1672P) ZOA 4-85 — August 6, 1.985 PC MTG — Page 7 1864 Commercial Professional On May 6, 1985, the City Council adopted an ordinance which modified the Industrial Park Chapter (18.68) of the code to allow limited retail and service uses in Industrial Park developments. Staff proposes that the - Commercial Professional Chapter (18.64) be modified to allow the same limited retail and service uses. The revision proposed by staff is as follows: 18.64.030 Permitted Uses (2) Commercial Use Types (A) Animal sales and services (i) Grooming (ii) Veterinary: small animals (B) Building maintenance services (C) Business equipment sales and services (D) Business support services (E) Communication services (F) Day Care Facilities (G) Financial, insurance and real estate services (H) Medical and dental services (I) Participation sports and recreation: (i) Indoor (i i) Outdoor (not to exceed 10% of the total square footage within the office complex) (3) Personal service facilities (K) Professional and administrative services (L) Research services (M) The following uses, separately or in combination, shall not exceed a total of 20% of the entire square footage within the development } complex: (I) Conv .nience sales and personal services, (i1) Eating and drinking establishments a : (iii)Retail sales, general. .t On July 23, 1985, the CCI reviewed the language proposed by staff and, after discussing the Percentage requirement, the members present concurred with staff's Proposal._ Also, Section 18.64.040 Conditional Use should be corrected by deleting subsection (4) Participation Sports and Recreation. (EAN:pm/1672P) ZOA 4-85 -- August 6, 1985 PC MTG * Page 8 y..,., ..t; ., __ ._.... ...., Awl..,., ...». .,.......... _ _. _ p • 18.114 Signs On February 5, 1985, the Planning Commission reviewed a proposal by staff to allow directional signs to be erected on private property to identify dr•ivewa, entrances and exits. Questions were raised as to the appropriate size for these signs. The commission asked the staff to review the size issue and bring the matter back before the Commission. Staff has made field visits, reviewed the size issue and suggests the following changes to the sign code. Directional or instructional signs on private property when such signs are solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists on adjoining public streets. One sign with an area of six (6) square feet per face shall be permitted per driveway Said signs shall be consistent with Chapter -18.102 (Visual Clearance Areas) . This subsection shall be added to Section 18.114.130 as follows Multifamily Residential Zones d (b)(6) and change (6) to (7) Commercial Zones (CBD/CG) (c)(3) and change (3) to (4) Commercial Professional Zone (d)(7) and change (7) to (8) Neighborhood Commercial Zone (e)(4) and change (4) to (5) Industrial Zones (I-P/I--L/7G-H) (f)(3) and change (3) to (4) At the July 23, 1905 CCI meati.ng, members present raised concerns about the directional signs becoming additional advertising or identification signs for ',. businesses. The CCI expressed support for the directional signs if the signs were limited to that purpose. It is the opinion of staff that the 6 square feet size limitation will limit the copy that can be accommodated on the signs. • Also, Section 18.114.130 (b) should be corrected (Delete items in brackets () and add underlined items) as follows: Multi Famil Residential Tones. No sign shall be permitted in a R--12, (R-20) R-25, or (A-20) R 40 zone except for the following • • (EAN pm/1672P) ZOA 4-85 -- August 6, 1985 PC MTG Page 9 • ._..._.._ _ ..;,.:.mow_ _...._.: ._.<.. .. .... .w. . . w 18 .106 Parking and Loading • In the past few months, the staff has received inquiries about the possibility of allowing vehicles to be stored on areas which are not paved but are improved with a gravel surface. Staff has reviewed the issue and believes that a gravel surface would be adequate for vehicle storage areas. Under the =, change proposed, all required parking areas for a use shall be paved but additional areas for storage of vehicles may be gravel. The changes proposed by staff are as follows: 18. 106.050 (Parking and Loading) (i) Parking Space, Parking and Loading Area Surface Requirements. All areas used for the parking, storage, or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat, or trailer shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfaces according to the same standards required for the ti: construction and acceptance of City streets except for the following: (1) Off—street parking spaces for single and two--family residences shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface to specifications as approved by the Public Works Director,_ (2) Storage areas for recreational vehicles, non—operating vehicles, fleet vehicles, construction materials, and open � air storage q (Wholesaling, Storage, and Distribution Heavy) ,j may be improved with a gravel surface which meets specifications approved by the City Engineer. This {€ subsection pertains only to areas totally devoted to storage, All access drives shall be installed and maintained as provided in subsection (j) below. (i) Access Drives, Access drives from the street to off—street parking, loading, or storage areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; and (1) The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.108 (ACCESS AND EGRESS) . (2) Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and A defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives. (3) Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance as provided in Chapter 18. 102 (VISION CLEARANCE). (4) Access drives for single and two-family residences shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface to specifications approved by the City Engineer. All other access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface to the same standards required for the construction and acceptance of City streets . On July 23, 1985, the CCI reviewed the concept proposed by staff. The members present agreed to support staff's proposal for storage areas only, All required parking, access and loading areas shall be paved. ZOA 4--85 _ August 6, 1985 PC MTG — Page 10 H • • { BUFFER REQUIREMENTS It has come to the attention of staff that in some cases the sideyard and rear yard setbacks stated'in the individual zoning section dimensional requirements may be increased by the buffer matrix in Chapter 18. 1.00. The setback requirement increases primarily where residential zones abut commercial.' and industrial zones Staff feels that a reference to the buffer requirements should be included in the additional requirements section of each applicable zone. Pages from the affected sections are attached and marked. ;Mt . The CCI reviewed the proposed changes on July 23, 19.85 and indicated support for the change. • EAN a l s/9 672P I. • • to .•:n } ZOA 4-85 — August 6, 1985 PC MTG -- Page 11 Chapter 18.136 Annexations Currently, the Community Development Code requires that an application for annexation be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to review by the City Council. In addition to reviewing the annexation petition itself, the Planning ommission also recommends the zoning designation on the 5 g g property. to the City Council. This two hearing requirement means the annexation application process can take up to three months from application submittal to City Council adoption of the resolution, The Oregon Revised Statutes do not require City Planning Commissions to review annexation petitions, Staff recommends that Chapter 18. 136 of the Community Development Code be modified to delete the requirement that annexation petitions be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Staff recommends that the following language be deleted 18 136;020 "(d) Within 45 days after the closing of the application submittal period, the Commission shall hold a public hearing in ` accordance with the provisions of 18.32 and based on the standards in 18.36.030 shall make: (1) A recommendation to approve, approve with modifications or deny the requested annexation; and" Staff recommends that Section 18.136.020 (e) be modified to read "(e)" Within 45 days after the closing of the application submittal period, the Council shall hold a public hearing in accordance with the procedures of 18.32, and .shall make a recommendation to the Portland Area Boundary Commission for approval, approval with modifications or denial of the annexation based on the standards in 18.32.030. At the same hearing the Council shall assign the development or established area classification as provided by Chapter 18.138, the zoning designation as provided in Chapter 18,32 and, if necessary, the Council shall assign the Comprehensive Plan designation." Should the Planning Commission support staff's recommendation, Section 18.32.090(C) and 18.32.090(d) in the Quasi Judicial Procedures Chapter will need to be modified to reflect the changes. On July 23, 1985, the CCI members present at the CCI meeting concurred with ;' staff's recommendations. 1672P t . dmj ZOA 4-85 — August 6, 1985 PC MTG — Page 3 I,:, • • 18. 138 Established and Developing Area Classification At the July 23, 1985, CCI meeting,; staff reviewed the possibility of combining Chapter 18.138 with Chapter 18.136, Annexations. This was suggested by staff to eliminate confusion among applicants for annexation regarding the Established/Developing Area requirement. It was suggested by the CCI members that staff clarify the requirements on the application form and not modify the Code Chapters. Staff concurs with this suggestion and will modify the application forms accordingly. 1672P dmj • • ZOA 4-85 - August 6, 1985 PC MTC Page '4 * t 18, 132 Nonconforming Uses During the most recent Home Occupation renewal period it became apparent that > ' there are home occupation businesses which were issued permits prior to the adoption of the Community Development Code in 1983 some of these businesses 1j1\ do not conform to the present code requirements for Home Occupations These :4. businesses are considered nonconforming uses within conforming structures. Staff has reviewed the language in Section 18.132.040(d)(1) Nonconforming Uses I of Structures with the City Attorney and determined that the language in that section applies to non conforming Home Occupation business. The language is } as follows: (d) Nonconforming Uses of Structures. (1) If a single lawful use contained in a single structure involving that structure or structure and premises in combination (except for a single, accessory structure) existed as of '(larch 16, 1983,_ would not be allowed in the zoning district in which it is located, or • which is nonconforming because of inadequate off—street parking, ; landscaping, or other deficiency, (under the terms of this ordinance or amendment thereto) the lawful use may be continued so long as it remains otherwise lawful, subject to the following provisions (A) No existing structure devoted to a use not permitted by this Code in the zoning district in which it is located shall he enlarged, extended, constructed, reconstructed, moved, or ..':: structurally altered except to accommodate a changing of the use of the structure to a use permitted in the zone in which it is located (B) Any nonconforming use may be extended throughout any existing parts of a building which were manifestly arranged or designed for such use at the time of adoption or amendment of this Code, but no such use shall be extended to occupy any land outside such building (C) A change of use for a single use in a single structure, may occur under the following conditions: (i) The nonconforming use status was registered with the Planning Director in the manner provided by 18.132.040 (d) (3) for the purpose of establishing the use classification f as listed in any of the Permitted Uses subsection of this e code; and (ii) The new use is within the registered Permitted Use classification; or, (iii) The new use conforms to the zoning ordinance provisions. r . ZOA 4-85 — August 6, ;1985 PC MTG Page 5 (D) When a` nonconforming use of a structure and premises is discontinued or abandoned For 6 months the structure and ,' premises shall not, thereafter be used except in full conformity t with all regulations of the zoning district in which it is located, For purposes of this Section, a use shall be deemed to be discontinued or abandoned upon the occurrence of the first of any of the following events: (i) On the date when the structure or premises are vacated, (ii) On the date the use ceases to be actively involved in the sale of merchandise or the provision of services, (iii) On the date of termination of any lease or contract under which the nonconforming use has occupied the premises, and (iv) On the date a request for final reading of water and power meters is made to to the applicable utility districts; and (F) Where a nonconforming use status applies to a structure and premises, removal or destruction of the structure shall eliminate the nonconforming use status of the land. . . (i) Destruction for the purpose of this subsection is defined as damage to an extent of more than 60% of its current assessed value by the Washington County Assessor. (ii) Any subsequent use shall conform fully to all provisions of the zoning district in which it is located L.. It is the opinion of staff that Chapter 18.132 does not need to he modified to address nonconforming uses for Home Occupation businesses. jt ZOA 4-85 -, August:6, 1985 PC MiG Page 6 �' ., a;. 4 18.142 Home Occupations y Development pdated during the Comprehensive Plan t... When the Communit C7evelo ment Code was u g A process in 1983, the Chapter - on Home Occupations was modified. The new I requirements for Home Occupation permits requires that all Home Occupations 1 issued under the provisions of the Code be renewed annually. The renewal provisions however, do not address renewal requirements for Home Occupations which existed prior to the 1983 adoption of the Code, Staff �? p proposes that Chapter 18.142 of the Community Development Code be amended as follows: f Add Section 18.142.035 Permit Renewal — Applicability ; (a.) Home occupation permits issued under the provisions of this code shall expire after one year and an application for renewal of the permit shall be filed with the City to continue lawful operation of the home occupation business. The permit renewal application shall 1 :^ be approved or denied in accordance with the provisions set forth in 1 Section 18.142.040 of this code. j' (b. ) Home occupation permits which received approval prior to November fr.: /983 but ma y be nonconforming as defined in Section 18. 132.090(d)(1) shall be renewed annually. The permit renewal application shall be approved or denied in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 18 142.040 of this code. 1 (1) Upon approval of the first renewal for Home Occupations which r are nonconforming as defined in Section 18.132.040(d)(1), the Director shall set as a condition of approval that the business must be in conformance with the Home Occupation approval ' criteria within 5 years. i (c. ) Home occupation businesses which existed without a valid Home Occupation permit prior to November 1983 shall apply for a Home Occupation permit under the provisions of Chapter 18.142. The original permit shall be valid for one year and shall be renewed annually under the provisions of Section 18.142.040. On July 23, 1983 the CCI discussed staff's proposed changes to the Home Occupation chapter. The members present concurred with staff and suggested r that a time limit be set for nonconforming home occupations to comply with i applicable code Provisions. 1, (EAN;pm/1672P) fi fi! ZOA 4-85 — August 6, 1985 PC MTC -- Page 7 18,64 Commercial Professional on may 6, 1985,. the City Council adopted an ordinance which modified the Industrial Park Chapter (18,68) of the code to allow limited retail and service uses in Industrial Park developments. Staff proposes that the Commercial Professional Chapter (18.64) be modified to allow the same limited retail and service uses. The revision proposed by staff is as follows: 18.64.030 Permitted Uses (2) Commercial Use Types (A) Animal sales and services (i) Grooming (ii) Veterinary: small animals (B) Building maintenance services (C) Business equipment sales and services (D) Business support services (E) Communication services (F) Day care Facilities (G) Financial, insurance and real estate services (H) Medical and dental services (I) Participation sports and recreation: (i) Indoor (ii) Outdoor (not to exceed 10% of the total square footage within the office comple) ) (J) Personal service facilities (K) Professional and administrative services k (L) Research services (M) The following uses, separately or in combination, shall not exceed .f. a total of 20% of the entire square' footage within the development o,C complex (1) Convenience sales and personal services, (ii) Eating and drinking establishments, (iii)Retail sales, general. On July 23, 1985, the CCI reviewed the language proposed by staff and, after discussing the percentage requirement, the members present concurred with staff's proposal. • Also, Section 18.64.040 Conditional Use should be corrected by deleting subsection (4) Participation Sports and Recreation, (EAN:pm/1672P) . 4 ZOA4--85 -- August 6, 1985 PC MTG Page 8. er C. r 4t 19,114 Signs ,, r k 5, nnin Commission reviewed a proposal .by staff to �, On February .�, 1985, the Pla g allow directional signs to be erected on private property to identify driveway f entrances and exits. Questions were raised as to the appropriate size for W these signs. The commission asked the staff to review the size issue and bring the matter back before the commission. Staff has made field visits, reviewed the size issue and suggests the following changes to the sign code. , Directional or instructional signs on private property when such signs are } solely designed to identify driveway entrances and exits for motorists o►� > square feet per �, adjoining public streets. One sign with 'an area of six (6) Said signs shall be consistent with face shall be permitted per driveway g Chapter 19.102 (Visual<Clearance Areas) . , This subsection shall be added to Section 18..114.130 as follows: , multifamily Residential Zones , .- (b)(6) and change (6) to (7) Commercial Zones (CSD/CC) (c)(3) and change (3) to (4) 1 Commercial Professional Zone ,,. (d)(7) and change (7) to (8) . Neighborhood Commercial Zone :. (e)(4) and change (4) to (5) Industrial Zones (I--P/I-L./I-H) i (f)(9) and change (3) to (4) '4. Jul Z3 1985 CCI meeting, members present raised concerns about the 1 At the July �:. directional signs becoming additional advertising or identification signs for l; businesses. The CCI expressed support for the directional signs if the signs ,; ited to that ur pose. It is the opinion of staff that the 6 square is were lim p . feet size limitation will limit the copy that can be accommodated on the signs. i 14 Also, Section 18.114,130 (b) should be corrected (Delete items in brackets () s and add underlined items) as follows: I Multi Fami.l_y Residential Zones No sign shall be permitted in a R-12, 1' (R-20) R_25,' or (A--20) R-40 zone`except for the following: x EAN:p(11/1672P) 1 i ZOA 4-85 - August 6, 1985 PC MTG -- Page 9 t: 1 ei4 1$.116 Parking and Loading In the past few months, the staff has received inquiries about the possibility of allowing vehicles to be stored on areas which are not paved but are improved with a gravel surface, Staff has reviewed the issue and believes .. that a gravel surface would be adequate for vehicle storage areas. Under the change proposed, all required parking areas for a use shall/. be paved but additional areas for storage of vehicles may be gravel. The changes proposed by staff are as follows 18.106,050; (Parking and Loading) t (i) Parkins ace, Parking and Loadin. Area Surface Re•uirements, All areas used for the parking, storage, or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat, or trailer shall be improved with asphalt, or concrete surfaces according to the same standards required for the n, construction and acceptance of City streets except for the following (1)` Off—street parking spaces for single and two-family residences shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface to specifications as approved by the Public ‘Works Director. (2) Storage areas for recreational:, vehicles, norn—operating vehicles, fleet vehicles, construction materials, and open air storage (lholesaling, Storage, and Distribution Heavy) may be improved with a gravel surface which meets specifications approved by the City Engineer. This subsection pertains only to areas totally devoted to storage. All access drives shall be installed and maintained as provided in subsection (j) below. (j) Access Drives. Access drives from the street to off—street ,, parking, loading, or storage areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site and (1) The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.108 (ACCESS AND EGRESS) . (2) Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives. (3) Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance as provided in Chapter 18.102 (VISION CLEARANCE) (4) Access drives for single and two—family residences shall. be .'. improved with an asphalt or concrete surface to specifications approved by the City Engineer. All* other access drives' shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface to the same standards required for the construction and acceptance of City streets On July 23, 1985, the CCI reviewed the concept proposed by staff. The members present agreed to support staff's proposal for storage areas only. All required parking, access and loading areas shall be paved. ZOA 4-85 -- August 6, 1985 PC MT'G — Page 10 s, huu ' [ h' L lt."-: r: 02,11:,),O ; CCI AGENDA .c - . (7. 4 i , WEDNESDAY, my 24 1985 P.M.' C ,, , ..,,,,.,:/k)s-- TIGARD CITY HALL J , 6011-- Os ' -.a.ux*.Ww1Y•M/wwws ae�?,MwvsFYw,c.a.rs,.aeuau.y'v�r"✓'CORNER „B- OF ASH AND BURNHAM f „ ,.,,,f - -.. (0 . Call to Order /put 2. ROLL CALL: MOEN 8LAUROCK, OTT BLEDSOE ____. :. BALL HOPKINS PASTERIS BOE3ERG .? INFORMATION ON THE FOLL014INlG ITEMS WILL BE HANDED OUT AT THE MEETING. Dµiscussion of setbacks for single family residences in the R-25 and R-40 Zones (Section 18.56.050 and 18.58.050) ' vio0P- Discussion of hearing and application requirements for annexation, (Chapter 18.136) - ; '"' :' ' :, .-- '' , n r F r , . k , -, 5 s ne4 t--�� L _ .-_s. a .- ,w - . : T -. z Review of Chapter 18. 132 Nonconforming Uses. , , ..',: C. Review of Home Occupation permit renewal requirements (Chapter 18.142). ''• 1 fn CO' 1' 1 . Review of Permitted Uses in the CP Zone (Chapter 18.64). Review of Sign Code (Chapter 1 8, 114) ,, ;t 1 J , ; vi/(..;. Review of requirements C tr 18,106 I (&) a ici-t �4 a e r Y,, c 1 Rp s e ` o. Seo ` ar i,; `2,3 I gal r 'o of t.1,1- apr) l a " (,,,,, a „i'° a ,G`_'n tr•5� ?.t' * vie , , V 4 t .. 1 4" '�'a w+'r'"'E A ' 12, Other Business 4, ' " a"°f ' '`' _ k f 18. Ad Adjournment .'" M ,�., ,;;.. •.. ' yP ,.,. ... . 'w •... ~...';'yr., '^'+.'. n.,w.•.`2.•..`•_.w. ' . v_: „ ":G43a `..'£N'S.:'. 't:.:. ''.F:lfpf3u"Xlf-l2A--5'x+'Y..^k'�,.. YRTas''le'%xt ........ .-,_,.N.ha,*„» x....nz.rw+++.r.-6i,».,., .n.sa....,w... ...n.:._3 .,_k,.- •_. ,...., •. .... ::.i..4»..n,.,.-:',. ..,,,,..,:, 1. •1•*' A 3„ Ir� Aldace N� Howard • ' • . &Ill. • • •.. ..• ITrr..' AM . • . '''-'.........-' . ..,,:,- • - . , . . , . Mti/Y 29 1985 •4;E�t•Y OF TIGA PLANNING DEPTH May .;,', • Mr. William' Monahan Director of Planning acid Development' City of Tigard 12755. ;SAW. Ash Avenue •t Tigard , Oregon 97223 Dear Sir Would .you nlease initiate the• necessary process to bring about - a change in the Community Development Code, specifically 18.106.050 subparagraph (i) Parking Space Surface Reouirements. 1 suggest that you add a, section dealing with commercial. storage of vehicles ,. which makes it permissible to use gravel or crushed rock as a base in storage areas. i You might consider grouping recreational vehicle storage, schoolbus parking yards, autobody shop storage etc. under one specific heading. Drive-'in theatres are a bit different, but the prostects of build : g such a facility in this community are certainly dim considering• the erwth in home entertainment systems. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Z would appreciate .. it very much if you would keep me informed of your progress. Be assured that I will be as helpful as Possible. • Your? ,tru .7: , ' Aldie • ovTa.rd t i Y . 4' 4 . r..:r 10030 S.W.'Picks Court Tigard, Oregon 97223 (503) 620-4835 .• 4. ■ sa• P r c. . t j;' • • . } ' .o ''0--2,3 • 8 • ? . f5"--'-ii•-.) (2,- .- ?cit 6'Z) is,/ cy.--1,,,. . .... I 1 C( 4• 1 el..,le.• � �. k `100.07 ,..� i t2=!5 •... \ t r •10 ;, ..; 15 y . I.,' _- ,, Is..'... Or - . . 3 s3 Qr �_ 'r; s. - 4,g1. 7500 '; L . 11.4375 CA. ?� sa 70.33 70 68 _ 71.98 ,r •, ... :; ' .. _ .. . , :: /_ m � 0,, 1Yl3AC7 75 73.0' (5"9:01 10+4 'r. - IXSO" r u 60 4501' '. �� J ! I 6( 06 03 tlY• J ' c 8400 _ 5 �.� r) iOO • Intl �a�,,, kQ 00 8 8600 - 8700 4 1 it::° X4800 - 8900 (0).; 9 m i�I NT - �° 8 _ - o ccv e� 9200 0 y ' Q: 4 3 - 2 —I1.37 1 �� oo ..- -- -._pf Ra15 ® 1 — °� • 67 •, s �y�.o, I/4 COR. ?g? 26. _ .., 0� 9 66.6 0 6 6 e..8 i 4?.s% �b MON.60X tq+/88.955 CAP T0.3T 1 . �_ .®• a t m o, p425 # 4 ° 66 \ 5 . �'�� 39.27 22:33 � 'Irk' 1 79.255 77.77' �-'ca 'e� 3 , 3 , • • 63 ,* $p T! �x� X15 iO�QO R 15 ±.)''.;- ;� 139.23 p k II6 07 0 �, I I�JO` �, EO�0O � �=i3 900 � co) a 11500 11400 .n 46 55 -:� 58 n ` i- 43 g. 12 *3 k = 2 45 11200 10500 10200 146-45 \- SEE SAP LS i i2OI3 03•,E l �, 47. °` 07 57 p 9500 r.a d '1170°2 103.?a -. ;., f 54 4 11800 93 . 57 ,va, 6,41. ° '''.. •. . ey • r,, – 11900 I 110 10100 d •�, "=s5 o$z 01'F‘1%1%/N1 s.3_s ,r.-..., 4r1 a 1 d _ - r�, o'-- ,� =:'. FOR ASSESSP•,� ��' •, ,.. 40 "' �8 � � _ 58641.26 �� o ® ��� 9600 © \ PURPOSES OP • 92.97 j)9 :. ..- 209. h�' UO N OT RELY . l46.77 11000 10700 1 0000 1�OR ANY O7•i°i EF ram ft .g ti - al .°o • �� • b9 52 °,912.1 02.97 65 59 ai i.- .sQ ®J Tg 93 — 12200 - 12100 0 12000 °� 10 00 &. , i08OC� `' 9900 9800 9700 •k .e +p fi O ' e�e_ � `O 0 tJ� ® + ` O 6CS — + r 38 50 9s25 , a45 51 60 �► 8 I 62 `�R IIF'!$ 33 tt3q-6! r -i 6 toe'tio, .70_ .°4 X29 '. 4 f 7 05 11t: ! - 1••Ai _f 45 10 4. r.. %Wzr/r///"."///Sirt,'Alisr, r:°Eltr..1/7/,r rli�iii�i�ii��i,�airi���iiiiapis`�siiirr,�fiif�iioii�isii.�isi�ii���iiai�iai�iiiiiir/iiii�oi��.�i.�iii��i/////1/// �� " F'' A - ''.. y. ' . iq. ., art OF TIC . , WASHINGTON COUNW,OR r ,: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ZONE CHANGE/ZO-;�E ORDINANCE AMENDMENT APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash, PO Box 23397 • Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY, 4 CASE NO —4• RECEIPT NO yam----- • APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: ; • DATE: 1,. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: , PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION a f G k, ,,t , 4 `Agit `. o_e(A) Application form (1) (B) Owner's signature/written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. / - ?� ' / / �.�'— c, ` authorization , - (C) Applicant's statement y .. SITE SIZE / ! .d/1 ,_ 491 (15 copies) _ . ' PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER* a (r'i� 1 �, (D) Filing fee • ADDRESS PHONE Additional information for Compre •.: CITY ZIP sive Plan Map Amendments/Zone Changes APPLICANT* L' At t/L 4 P,4(, r`• 1 //4 r (E) Maps indicating property ADDRESS 7, :.r►. ,1 - 4 O'.4A ' PHONE j „/—I , location (15 copies) ....2.:', CITY ‘I Al 14 ZIP G,"`) (F) List of property owners *When t e owner and he applicant are different within 250 feet (1) people, the applicant ust be the purchaser of record Assessor's(G) map (1) ;.`or a leasee in possession with written authorization (H) Title transfer instrument (1) from the owner or an agent of the owner with writtea authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or ,: ; submit a written authorization with this application. DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: •" 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: , request a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (if COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: : applicable) from to ; and a Zone Change from to N.F.O. Number: 1: : ORr , The applicant requests an amendment to the , Planning Commission Approval Date: ; following sections of the Comprehensive Plant. a or Community Development Code -j / • - :. E. 2- /5,, (o - /°'`" .,/Z,L9 City Council Approval Date: j , ._ (KSL:pm/0737P) , f'�,I v4 R,.�" � �/ 5, � YV.46 /6 ran}y.`.. f . s-. ,. ... ..« . ,, „ ,x,•..,,...w..s ..w.... .a,.r.-nv..a Y. "M" . e:.='... .•rn.'A+w.:. r' , 3. List any variance, conditional uses, or other land use actions to be considered E+ as part of this application: 12 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments '' described in the attached information sheet at the tame you° submit this application. - 5. THE APPLICANT(S). SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. ' B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and , limitations of the approval. F' C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true. and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. • DATED this 7 day of 19 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. r f . ./nice V . rr, •t (K,SL:pm;0737P) i •� .. - �ry .,,.�tryyw w r..'.d`tr�,y• x .W!±, r e.i:.x ; • • a APPLICATION INFORMATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/ZONE CHANGE/ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT PART I REVIEW PROCESS •. A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1. Text Change This applies to amendments to the text and policies contained within the "Tigard Comprehensive Plan - Findings, Policies, and Implementation Strategies, Volume 2" or "Tigard Comprehensive Plan REsource Document Volume 1 2. map change This relates to amendments made to the land use designations which appear on the adopted Comprehensive Plan Map, This type of Plan amendment is often made in conjunction with a Zone Change which is described below. B. Zone Ordinance Modifications 1. Zone Ordinance Amendment Changes in the requirements of the Community Development Code are considered as Zone Ordinance Amendments. These modifications are typically initiated by the Planning Commission or City Council but the general, public may also propose changes to the Code. 2. Zone Change This applies to amendments made to the zoning designations which appear on the adopted Zoning District Map. If the prop osed Zone - . Change is not consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan Designation, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment must be reviewed simultaneously. C. The application and review process involves the following steps: 1. preapplication Conference Prior to submission of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zone Change, or Zone Ordinance Amendment, the applicant must make an appointment with the Planning Staff to discuss the proposal as it relates to the applicable requirements. 2. Public Hearing. before Planning Commission Comprehensive Plan Amendments to the text or map and Zone Ordinance Amendments will be reviewed by the Commission and a recommendation shall be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Zone Changes will be approved or denied by the Commission based upon the applicable criteria. (l) s ;.t. 'T M r•. ara.gr. 2M R t!i#'nK-.Syglyli,/,K+tiro .. . vA' ':. ..•'0 ..w-..0 �� _ 6 4.T� i YTC '°i: ^^"n'f!J'.-t!!dr.h4bI.Y3.':h.1 f�..Mt�s.a::aw4hw=il..4.l+i..`+A'. • 3. Public Hearing before City Council The City- Council shall review the Planning Commission recommendations for Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zone Ordinance 'Amendments and will approve or deny the proposal based upon the applicable criteria. In the case of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a Zone Change being reviewed concurrently, a zone district approved by the Planning Commission shall become effective following City Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. D. Following approval, the change will be implemented by the City. PART II APPROVAL CRITERIA A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment (text change) 1. Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines 2. Consistency with other Plan policies B. Comprehensive Plan Amendment (map change) 1. Statewide Planning. Goals and Guidelines 2. Consistency with other Plan policies • 3. Locational Criteria in Chapter 12 of the Plan, Volume 2 C. Zone Ordinance Amendment (Community Development Code) 1. Comprehensive Plan policies 2. Consistency with other provisions of the Community Development Code D. Zone Change (Map Change) 1. Comprehensive Plan policies 2. Locational Criteria in Chapter 12 of the Plan, Volume 2 } 3. Consistency with other provisions of the Community Development Code r.. E. Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines ~. State law requires that local land use plans be consistent with the • Y.; Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines. The Goals that are relevant to the City are listed and briefly described below: t 1. Goal #1: Develop a citizen involvement program that ensures the opportunity for citizens to pp y get involved in all aspects of the planning' process; (2) i • 2 Goal #2 Establish a land use planning process and policy framework as the basis of all land use decisions and actions, and ensure an adequate factual data base to substantiate those decisions and actions; 3. Goal #3. Preserve and maintain agricultural lands beyond the Urban Growth Boundary of the community; 4. Goal #4: Conserve forest lands, not committed for urban uses, for strictly forest uses; a:- 5. Goal #5: Conserve open space and protect natural and scenic resources;' y- , 6 Goal #6. Maintain and improve the quality of air, water and land resources; 7. Goal #7: Protect the lives of community residents and property from natural hazard areas; 8. Goal #8: Meet the recreational needs of residents of the community, State, and visitors; 9. Goal #9: Diversify and improve the economy of the community and the State; 10. Goal #10: Provide adequate housing for the needs of the community, region and State; 110 Goal #11: Plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as the framework for urban development; 12. Goal #12: Provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system; I 13. Goal #13: Conserve energy; and A 14. Goal #14: Provide for an orderly and efficient transition from urbanizable to urban land uses. P. Comprehensive Plan Policies L. The Plan sets the policy direction related to land use and development. Different policies will apply depending upon the nature of a development proposal. L . Gs Locational Criteria These criteria are contained within the Comprehensive Plan. They describe the locational characteristics that should exist in order to accommodate specific land use activities. L . (3) it .r w.a r ti"W.MfI K+..y Y'-+Hw•• .}f w k 1 H.`, •yh,l •'( Mw Y+.+Y.xw .. -1. _ . .,,.m .`•'°.n.Y A#*'^'t'Ax F. `}t.N +^ rw K;'p`e•}y kt.$ `�'�en q t ,mom sTi ...u.a ..•(.s•rW+v+n .,pal:e;� Y • • H. Determination of Applicable. Criteria The Planning Staff will assist the applicant in order to ascertain o .; which criteria relate to a particular proposal. • PART ill - APPLICATION U�MISSI I`I REQUIREMENTS A. All applications shall be made on forms provided by the Director and shall be accompanied by: 1. One application form. 2. Fifteen copies of the necessary data or narrative which explains how the proposal conforms with the applicable criteria.' 3. The required fee :. 4. For Comprehensive Plan map amendments and Zone Changes, the following additional information shall be submitted: j. a. Fifteen copies of a map illustrating the location of the_ y property. b. One list of the names and addresses of all persons who are property owners of record within 250 feet of the property involved. c. One Assessor's map of the property. d. One copy of the title transfer instrument (eg. deed). (KSL:bs/0755P) • 1 , • • • (4) 1,.; .rt .' ..,y.. r w-+ ^P+.^ ^ti t#^H•r.:w w:t,••,,,„�.-aF. Fr' Y^'S♦.ya • • e ,;_e_�`m,/�� 7 j, („_, 2,0 0 �' , v ,,,,._., w ' e // f Kr ffn .. ua, 17 si, 5 . ///' /74 \..,., -..... } E CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION °- BY CITY COUNCIL (Sec. 18.32.380) 1. Concerning Case Number(s): ZOA 4-85 2. Name of owner: None 3. Name of Applicant City of Tigard ; Ti and State OR Z115)7223 Address 12755 SW Ash City g 4.` Location of Property: Address none Legal Description none _-- 5. Nature of Application: Review chafers 18.56, 18.58 . 18. 136 18. 142 • 18. 114, 18. 106, 1.8.48 18.54 . 18.60 18.62 18.68 18.70 18.72. 6 Action: .. 1. . 7. Notice: -Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant & owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Neighborhood Planning Organization XX Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of condition can be z obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. testons If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard }1' City Recorder, 639-4171. (0257P) (-7-71,a 0„-p- z., Ri/rivo-xpii)7 g 0,,/ V - -w)11417 1----zci ), // " 9.1-- 7-7102 ! .,..„, zi-7 /,-/I ,,--/24,--z, c„,/,2 „----i-yi:/ &(,/ 2,34/((?vizy c7--derip, c›-",--. ir,,,,_,5-a9-K-c, �;���� �� (772 o "97,-,W -� ��"gi -� . L gei,,,,ce-,.- ,..-22.7 ..---D-lwr) /1 -'' ''''doe- #62-2 zvi/ -zcig,/ --/xi://111/12 --//7,...,---)--/z-, ---/.: -- -//. *-- / 7- 1/v _g - 0,g" 0/ ---,'-.)-lidv- -4v1 2i;&/,--",y-/ go -g/ p.67_2/ 'TO @ "� q ,c° / ,.. a/ ,� :. Y .. �7.'. �, 17.4/V%t>. ,._. e � �'#1 4:' z..g)s (' (9) Mobile H[c4/11e Parks and subdivisions, Chapter 18.94 (7 (10) Public ,safety facilities • (11) Religious assembly ., (12) Schools and related facilities i' (13) Accessory dwelling Units 18.48.050 _ Dimensional Re uaremens. r_ r Dimensional Requirements in the R--3.5 district are gas follows: f`' (1) The minimum lot area shall not be less than 10,000. square feet (2) The average minimum lot width shall not be less than 65 ;:. feet. 1 (3) The minimum setback requirements are as follows: (A) The front yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet . (8) On corner and through lots, the minimum setback for f each side facing a street shall be a minimum of 20 1,, a, feet, however, the provisions of 18.102 (VISUAL S CLEARANCE) must also be satisfied. '(C) The side yard setback shall be a minimum of 5 feet cP °'ge,,. 6 R-" 0/4'�E O Dc '5 .T!D J •100. ("` 3Jc (Q) lhe rear yard setback shall a minimum of 15 feetdg ti . ,'°fl 1 aS1�tii. *c '�.�� (7,10°. PA �t�i-i1s c 4L RT' ..t (E) The distance between the property line and the front . of the garage shall be a minimum of 20 feet. (4) Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.98 . (BUILDING - ' HEIGHT LIMITATIONS), no buildi in an R_3:5 zoning district shall exceed 30 feet in height. 1. 18.48.060 Additional Requirements t Additional Requirements in the R-3.5 district are as follows: 1 Off-street I ' ( ) parking and loading, Chapter 1�,1D6 � (2) Access and egress, Chapter 18.108 f (3) Landscaping and screening, Chapter 18.100 ,` (4) Signs, Chapter 18.114 (5) Nonconforming situations, Chapter 18,132 ' (, (6) Accessory uses and structures, Chapter 16,/44 • III -- '81 `: ' .. 1 in.p.4.. ..yysr.a..,xgy. ."b^N'+h+.nnv.e-,+•' ..e ..A uR - '::.c..°.*t.u3:' , '1- - _ +-�-x+nfny se kl''i4uti�cv:nr+^�+t...ssb^A.•iy e4, A.' ® may�q �j��ry �! ,.. • e=�:"t.%. 1� � @ e e✓kw�a ( ^M firm / . R is OC . 11' ' (s)' `ow 3 (5) Group residential 1 . .. (6) Parking facilities ri • (7) ,Hospitals (8) ;Lodge, fraternal and civic assembly . 18.54.050 Dimensional Re.cuirements Dimensional Requirements in the R-12 distract are as follows; t. w (1) The minimum lot size shall not be less than 3,050 square • feet per unit. fi(2) There is no, minimum_ lot width requirement. , .:.. (3) The minimum setback requirements are as follows: [ (A) For multiple family dwellings, the front yard setback f shall be a minimum of 20 feet. For single family dwellings, the front yard shall be a minimum of 15 . feet. (B) For multiple family dwelling units on corner and through lots, the minimum setback for each side facing; a street shall be 20 feet, however, ' the Provisions of .1 ( chap ter. 18.102 (VISUAL CLEARANCE), must be satisfied. For single family dwelling units, the minimum setback for each side facing a street shall be 10 feet, however, the provisions of Chapter 18.102 must be satisfied. (C) For multiple family dwellings, the side yard setback shall be a minimum of 10 feet. For single family dwellings, the side yard setback shall be 5 feet 1 except this shall not apply to attached units on the r=; lot line on which thq units are attached. 4i ? °�' of a *0 I '•1 .1' ct '°16e;lf" -r .i (0) For multiple family dwellings, the rear yard setback 1 shall be a minimum of 20 feet. For single family dwellings the rear yard shall. be a minimum m of 15 feet.'4 ,1'I I (E) Where the side yard or rear yard of attached, multiple , family or single family dwellings abut a more t restrictive zoning district, such setbacks shall not f be less than 30 feet. i .. (F) The distance between the property l ne and the front I of the garage shall be. a minimum of ZQ feet. (4) Except as otherwise Provided in Chapt!,r 15.9. (BUll..,0ING 1 HEIGHT LIMITATIONS), no building in an R-12 zoning, district N .: shall exceed 35 feet in height. } r‘ III 90 ` i ' R-25 and R-40 --, Suggested Single Family Residential setbacks Front Yard - For Single Family dwellings the 'Front yard shall be a minimum of 15 feet. Corner and Thro e Lots - For Single Family dwellings units, the minimum setback for each side facing street shall be 10 feet, however, the provisions of Chapter 18.1 2 must be satisfied. Side Yard For Single Family dwellings, the side yard setback shall be 5 feet except this shall not apply to attached units on the lot line on which the units are attached, Also, the a provisions ,F Section 18.100130 (Buffer Matrix) shall be • satisfied Rear Yard For Single Family dwellings, the rear yard shall be a ► - mini.mum of 15 feet. Also, the provisions of Section 18.100,130 (Buffer Matrix) shall be satisfied Where 'the side yard or rear yard of attached, multiple fami.ly or single family dwe].li.ngs abut a more restrictive zoning district, such setbacks shall not be less than 30 feet. 1649P dm ,;K 3 } ta i�.tw ,# ,,,'„,•,,,.!,',. ""•'.1-,'..,,,,,:••' ..'-' 1': '4A .v. ., . w . v,: ..„ i ,w,.:-'>•`"_,b`+se-� mac'°`..r<,. ,,. t"t , ..x.p. • •.',..:, •" ,... . b .. .. ..r..._. a .. , 5. wa Q. �•,:a4 f 1`,��� ..,,., ,i'`1�.` •'R I p ilaw,R d. ..tea. j.s s.S t. G. . .1. .. q...�{'.... .4 + N m sef.N r.. S - :5 4 Y[M..r' 4, ''aa,..++.- ....Y :. ,rsa. r �a3! {, .1.. . _ � i' Fes. ��( ,A. t T. `. t1'�be ersnitted s .,5 #r;. .�. } r.}. -0, • fi. t' Q gyp �+�y [�j m � is �a i �p@p@@ p,( `.;'� ..•�' �;�.�� :. V�,��`��l�!P;o+���.�7� '��''''',4,�,. � t .;!;e':: f z. '..'.,. a - c 63.43 q �C. - a _ w 4 : �s��,f,: � � i f� .... �s���hm��d��av 1� M s •�, . 8^t:i41� 4C' a : ,., .. �• ., .... f�r :rhgJ' ..,, .. ,+, 1..,�sy,..y�Ea �.S � X. }sk: >'r a.uE'ss {3}2 '.{.' r,.. , a. y yr { '-' -:: 'i 1 ?`; } i • r/• f r:.. , '� -t $t b1 B.sh91!OWI t• =iL3 }. ' ",7'. d j• . .., • ` •hI r "t ft -' m i0. 0 f a•# �ha a y 1 a 5r•, .< a_,... ., -! q tCis ra'. �,� 7-i00:-,A.-•;:....,M;1 qi a eyk . ,w o .;tl ,1 '�.• .' it "- ' 4 {Jpe � " K .1,.. ^4 - ,,z.:=.;, r �y����{f h p 4 t' i a _•.-^ . x -, • . .,��Y.. ,.•. ..b�p s W ESt B�r?��la,w�-�u�yr.,�h N� K''WpBSd/At�oite is Pa `4 4 t r{ • � , 4 t�, �. • ., ..-� �- f ^� ,-•i<.F t, s`< ,„...,,,.R.--•;!=„; f a[ : v�y .r.M;.� "i NY'•�. ^,� L ut i � , . - ' ,' � q-1,',--',---. � ;k*ga�" mar p„ , .. Y 1. ' + a . 1 l y a .ita � , 14 § � z• � $ r } 2• ": ,w�aW u "-17,,.:::,1,....,.': F � ; + y ' : a -' .F*0 z.xu ,x.47,.� +a •' t a h + a ° :t °k a• a m ` G 1(•1, k✓t i 050 mT ot, , �tl`' � r # m onal -•• a • ii ^ ,.• •is , r : a k W Di,mens O.rial,.''gt, tiPq�i eT. Onts in; thy, C--6A6 di strl t 'are �s it ore r t ,. Y 3� .r r ;s• „ia s f y+. h s��rkf p�„�'jr .. a s, •�,� y +�s �q j {,p'''`'p� r�yg r'(� i qq,Y? .; •t 00 :iciva fed '!• ` m# -,. 'k ! 1 7. �hc m1nuuirUrilg gF° .'a. .. -t � b P '9 ! }-.'4 T, I i n ...� P I l A Y r ' , rW fr�� ; dm lot w di h shall be 50 feet. ' ��� The mn�m ,?„, (3) The .ini,n4.mum setback• requirements, Etre .as , 111a _• r (A): The front yard setback shall' b�.2,0 t',li ;, ,�ti, - �.• .. setback 5,hat�.'be (B) tin' Cc-rn4r:.ibt s; and through lot , the x 20 feet •on ariy side f ctr°° .-.a • streets however, the VIA : CLEARANCE) must ' ' Rr ltorrs aRt , • , ,. ,: q�t .of Ch er ..1 .`3.42 �� beY Sat`1sf tQd. ..F (C) No side .yard setback shall be r-equired,: except 20 feeta shall be r required where tt�e zone . abuts . 0 residential zoning district. A1 ,—ra ;. 1 „ c)4 10,0 ', t LS ,.,.:,,:, :', .. ' , ( ) No rear yard setback shall be required except 20 feet , shall be required where the C-f zone abut_s residential zonirig-.distr'ct, e' L451),'i°4 °�1 'S • } (E) All building separations shall meet all uniform ,A '.. Building Code requirements 4) Except as otherise provided in Section 18.98 (BUILDING i HEIGHT LIMITATIONS), no building in the C7N zoning district x -` shall exceed 35 feet in height. r(5) The maximum site coverage shall bem 85 percent including all { i .' buildings and °irreperuous sur•faces. .,.. r -::: (6) The minimum .ands,ca wing requirement 4hall Vie, 15 percent , , a , 18. 0.060 Additional R c liremehts ,.,.; . s Y?„.t^6 . <x 2p,! Additional Requirements in the C-N district are as foYlow„ �-=street. arki and loading, Chapter 1 .106 °.,[G, (2). Access and 'Egress', Chapter : , r (3) Landscaping and Screening, Chapter 18,100•(4) Signs., 'Chapter 18.114 ,,. _, a (5) Nonconforming Situations, Chapter 13.132 s • 18..62. 350 Dimensional aa%4.r.D.R2Lts ;. F.. . ( Dimensional Requirements in the C--C, district are as follows: °. (1) There is no minimum lot area required. (2) The average minimum lot width shall be 50 feet. (3) The minimum setback requirements are as follows: (A) There sh&il be no minimum front yard setback requirement, however, conditions in Section 18.102 :_. "Visual Clearance Areas" and Section 18.100 1 v "Landscaping and Screening" must be met. 5 (B) On corner lots and through lots, there shall be no ' -: minimum setback requirement, the provisions '` q however, the of Chapter 18.102 (VISUAL CLEARANCE) `must be satisfied. (C) No side yard setback shall be required, except. 20 feet 1. shall be required where the C-G zone abuts a residential zoning distri t. ®°�° It) 5 `rt•+ -1' a1�c.a_N ;"(9dVeca r°..% • O d SAT(5,c%fes . i 6 , (D) No rear yard setback shall be required, except 20 feet I shall be required where the C-G zone abuts a residential zoning district 4 41'b eJPSal a ql o- l .i ce, E `` i)r'c i . x �tST ' t9S.ci . I' (4) Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.98 (BUILDING � HEIGHT LIMITATIONS) no building in a C-G zone shall exceed a 45 feet. : (5) The maximum site coverage shall be 85 percent including all buildings and impervious surfaces. 1 f; c (6) The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 15 percent 18.62.060 Additional Requairec ents '.: Additional Requirements in the C-G district are as follows (1) Off--street parking loading, Chapter 18.106 [ (2) Access and Egress, Chapter 18.108 k , (3) Landscaping and Screening, Chapter 18.10 ;.0 4 (4) `Signs, Chapter 18.114 } (5) Nonconforming Situations, Chapter 19,132 (6) Sensitive Lands, Chapter 18.84; (14..„, t III - 103 A --7-'---7---'---r----- y. :.etc, i 1 18.64.050 Dimensional Re«;uirements tl (''''' Dimensional Requirements in the. C-P district are as follows (1) The minimum lot area shatl'be 6,000 square feet. (2) The average minimum lot width shall be 50 feet (3) The minimum setback requirements are as Follows: (A) There shall be no minimum front yard setback requirement, however, conditions in Section 18.10 "Visual Clearance Areas" and Section, 18.100' "Landscaping and Screening" must be met. (B) On corner lots and through lots, there shall be no minimum setback requirement, however, the provisions of Chapter 18.102 (VISUAL CLEARANCE) must be satisfied. (C) No side yard setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be_ required where the C-P zone abuts residential 4oning district ' ,'T . vtt51C:f °1"1ON`-1 r (0) No rear yard setback shall be required except 20 feet 4 shall be required where the C-P zone abuts a residential zoning district. "T'� V(51,0NS c '", tteet (E) All .building separations shall meet all Uniform Building Code requirements. . t (4) Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.98 (BUILDING t HEIGHT LIMITATIONS) no building in the C-P zoning district. shall exceed 45 feet in height (5) The maximum site coverage shall. be 85 percent including all buildings and impervious surfaces. (6) The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 15 percent. 18.64.062 Addtaonal Requirements Additional Requirements in the C-P district are as follows: .'. 4 (1) Off-street parking and loading, Chapter 18.106 (2) Access and Egress, Chapter 18.,148 , (3) Landscaping and Screening, Chapter 18.100 .. (4) Signs, Chapter 18.114 V yT (5) Nonconforming Situations, Chapter 18.132 `, �� � � <(6) Sensiti�c� Lends, Charter 1.8;.84 ,.. ' ' 4/.) I"lallePti'r 6.3ea.P.rie)1,) - 56,es. if 0111 t3.v..,A5 ELI -- 106 • 1A.68.040 Conditional se sectio i iR.1 D r Conditional uses in the I--P district are as follows (1) Day Care Facilities -- limited to 10%, of total complex. (2) Heliports, in accordance with the Aeronautics Division (ODOT) and the FA(a) (3) Utilities j 18 68.05D Dimensional Requirements s i , Dimensional Requirements in the 'I-•P district are as follows: r (1) There are no minimum lot area requirements (2) The average minimum lot width shall be 50 feet. - (3) The minimum setback requirements are as follows: . (A) The front yard setback shall be a minimum of 35 feet. (8) On corner lots and through' lots the setkiack shall be a ' minimum of 20 feet on any lot facing .a` street, however, the provisions of Chapter 18, 102 (VISUAL CLEARANCE) must be satisfied. {' (C) No side _yard setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the I-p zone abuts a • residential zoning distr c't. /r 614) ', (D) No rear yard setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the 1.-P zone abuts a ; residential zoning district. Development in industrial zones abutting the Rolling Hills ,, neighborhood shall comply with lip 1 X .11` ° • , C r�tc, oe da 0 .t e.t :4'c' . A 5 �� .. 5A" p 5 (E) All building, separations must meet all Uniform y: Building Code requirements. ::. (4) Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.98 (BUILDING '. HEIGHT LIMITATIONS), no building in the I P zoning district }. i shall exceed 45 feet in height. } (5) The maximum site coverage shall be 75 percent including buildings and impervious surfaces. (6) The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 25 percent ; l . 18.60.060 Additional Re'u Tent ' . Additional Requirements in the I--P district are as follows: ' (:.„ r /II - 114 • . .... r.... w Y .„ . v +. 4 70 9 040' C metd io .11 41. •, •° �, t.•. pia P �'tY�Y'j',`j�+k4 ,F�7 �a�k a Y1 tit? f. e. + i ��"'«_ 7 �+�•+b e �" r.t`.i �{•1xa t,kkF' �•i i •pS:i w i e ` *=,f. v • ;. t)•::,"gE� •x ) with Ar, � nat9 v�s i on1 i ia J A n s t ' 1') �• ..�:"C .fit � `t 'n• _ 'a Y 4 �s+_" �C _ t *{'4v}�`':"� Y..,{ �43�A� , ,Y'V. v.. Y; .}"w«t •.n a .. ';� + x�.ha �, ,.F i 3't�R:. .1 � S,h,y r P ,.�� �•._ r4 ;+., i"e�.:� ,�y;y i.r r •a N1w 1 4�e1Y W:' Y . ��, J f ky YF .rh.. f "S rA�+:1- «'q. "�N' e tti, a, :cs 4' .J R.'t is'' '4- xp'� r q.S .�. ?t�'�b ,g Nr,.:'9 ! ' 75.,'� ,,.�f,� t , t • .t c Sp .. a, c 4..f, •k.^[ 'f'Ft'i*u .X '� r +"x'^* s t *« 1.. '� u • (3) Vehicle,ftiel, S 1e .stag,,convo `. enc , sal rAy . t++t, • 1r �y 70.050 ipeerl3 ,:, �. "�.. '3:+r;} r S S J a:'�.+r s f.'.1'�ta•'-''•7` P^L'Yy ,t y+�,"` F���'. i1P�+* °'F>�`•, ti:., ' '�"'+ � .t .-S. '�ICRi:.-n Yk },74- j,�c:',l .t• T..T ' }. ' T r,}' 2•�. ;,', S,+.d:. J ' r .+ x � ?��«��^�' ..�:'"-r �4;w ft'._ D1t;ten ional Reqult rtiont ;t in; he = �� :; �+ ^7s. . to 5},.q4 + ,f«� k i ,, i. + ^7t (1) There are,no•minim 'lot area requireme ►t'it.` • (2) The average'eel'etintct lot ywi.dth shall be �5Q feet ' (3) The,rtninLrnu t`:setback.requirements art as follows r kr� .• t, r '� 3 (A) The front yard Setback shall bee' 30 feet a ��S (B) On. corner lots and through lots, the, setback shall be 20 feet on any side facing _ a str' et, , ,':however, the provisions of Chapter 18.102 "(VISUAL.. CLEARANCE) must be satisfied (C) No side yard' setback shall be required except 50 feet 5 QtyrX37 eoit.lelaa et4 . 1-L.. 4D T A ' stoaol'°aAlb . iSo lac � � a. �,- P/a 'c�t�� e �rr if,roc),d • (D) No rear yard setback shall be required except 50 feet .1 shall be required where the T-L zone abuts a residential zoning i.str'ct. TUE. (E) All building separations must meet all, Uniform Building Code requirements (4) Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.98 (BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITATIONS), no building, in the I-rL zoning district shall exceed 45 Feet in height. • (5) The maximum site coverage shall ' be 85 percent including buildings and impervious surfaces. The minimum landscaping requirement shall b e',15 percent. 18.70.060 Additional RZe ,rements Additional Requirements in the I. L' dtstrict`'are as -follows A , (1) Off—street parking and load arm;' Chapter 18,1()6 (2) Access and -egress, Chapter t8.°1.O8 (3) Landscaping and screening, Chapter`le.1OO (4) Signs, Chapter 18.114 ,;k (5) Nonconforming situations, Chapter 18.132 (H) Laundry services (I) Research services (3') Scrap operations/recychm.rng collect on centers (3) Industrial Use Types (A) ufacturing.of products::; (1) From raw materials (ii) From pre v io'-ss ly prepared materials (8) Packaging and Processing (C) Wholesale, storage and distribution (i) Mini-warehouse (ii) Light (iii) Heavy • (4) Farming 18.72.040 Conditional Use' (Section 18.130 t Conditional Uses in the I--H district are as, follows: (1) Heliparsts (2) Utilities y 13.7.2.®5U Aimens .or��l Requirements Dimensional Requirements in the I—H district are as follows: (1) There are no minimum lot area requirements. (2) The average minimum lot width .shall be 50 feet. (3) The minimum setback requirements are as follows: € (A) The front yard setback shall be 30 feet. Y . (8) on corner lots and through lots, the setback shall be street facing a street, however, the 2Q feet on any must prow of Chapter 18.102 (VISUAL CLEARANCE) be sat:�sf ied. C No side yard setback shall be required except 50 feet ( ) shall be required where the I-H zone abuts residential zoning '6.14A1.4.164� ���t �. (0) No rear yard setback shall be required . except 50 fee shall be required where the —H zone abuts a district � � res .dentia zoning ° ,�� "�-moo 14x .t 0 4 �» � ..` (F) All building separations must meet all U.ntfori ;, Building Code requirements. 1.20 • • .., a w .r•. - •.•••�» V r if5/ itr)b e)so p - 4,1. / Atop , t 1 / , , - /7 Ife.t., - i . .. , . ,e6/ .i i•i-4, tt)t-i , * ..,1., ,,e... fr';' . x 9'4/ ....X. f,j , il . i. ? ���� 4 1 i 4 I I 441 . e _I . ti, .,,4,; ge,,,,,te;,0 /,,,,‘_/ ,.4.14,,t,‘,- ''' - - ' ""'' ' • .,' i ..tee-le.-e-4. e ..,/,,,/e." ..60,1 Ot ., a,,,,,i,,,f r r (1) Off-street parking spaces for single and two--family t: residences shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface to specifications as approved by the Pubic Works ,, L Director, /' ) / f i f �. 9 -1 d , ,- ,......-- ,, / ,;.,,,- ,.. (Lii - - , , eti...„.6,/1:2 - -.-,x. . l'' MC t if #4111-1°1'7.4 '''''-'-i- . 4 f/ww 4-1-e. -.4,1'1,e'-e-2 ,410-tel.-te -‘ i.. .490 ' q #d - '. . ,/ x ' it-t,/_si-e,t.tii-e ‘ i,iiifh'ti ' er,4,45; • *, .� Y:. , , , 1. (j) Access Drives. . Acces drives from the street to off-street G parking loading, areas shall be designed and constructed to ; . r facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site and , °: (1) The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance c_`-_. with the requirements of Chapter 18.`108 (ACCESS AND EGRESS). 1 r e (2) Access drives shall be clearly -and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other•` r barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service ; drives, 3 Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance as provided- in Chapter 18,132 (VISUAL Ct_EARANL,E) , I L; . • Y '' . .') 1..'' . .'. . 411j1kt,. , , . ' i '.'' • ■ ..' . ' . . '. ,'(.' ',2/Ad1;i1' °''''':Gf '''''. . '.i.e11.0ii" .- ' ' '.' '1.'7...‘. 4,,,i,e.7/1 ,....t . . . . . i . !-.,..: ,..14/f/4fr d 4 ay d ••• :` •''''.../. --•./,''''' ' 1.?....41,e'ite.1,:isiea•tfe.,11!9' kOtti*,' -' / -- .'.'' ,' -', ''' .. -.,.? ,•s' •,....,, ,.• .-,,. ',..--_ I ,' ,. is 1 � — ...men , ... w -e .jam ♦...- c� :,., ,,. .,. . ,:., f , . , -1.