Loading...
ZOA4-77 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. ''' s4 t". ft tio, {,. tl 1 . .- . ;, i ,. ~'. .s I'4..,.� . = . )•• - t e,,, rt i' t k {;a a' Y4 tf L v ctrl k,64 i � r+ s y tya5 µ .z} �k x[rat 1f . 4�zt2^x�Jlr 1;h y'�f"a�'.t jrr�T}__-iii y?a 4 xt 4 t 7.k fl', �t��ra y�s�a`ay YF tt 54.-xf t J tt fj R µ ti '£{Y-n,4 t t st r f�th f x. 2A t4� tP°�` rS � 4'' �r�p ; �,,�. x. .-1�.. r �. v " ., �, t ' .. $� ct �•k: Mf " Ckt� i , :'f-:u +,-.�-m,r.-,.r'w,.,.��,.,,'k,.e...H4o,.�x.,r,-,.:+w4a,> �a:,r.•,iF,•-t',v,..,a x•r,x,.„..�4... .......; , ...,,: ..w..«..,:«,-..?';s,Y,: . .. ' �k�, m-, ..Ytt.£P?-.:t.,,,,, ,.fi.,tk,. a a , u�S<Ye �'�' Y,,' /' 1F.F!b tt{t�1<.,�f,:*�r x\b:{x�4�3 A r.L rA�Y�t�e E;,x��fror"F @.v ;f I.;wt�;i tti;F+,"a>r R�1+�'��C'{:4.��,a tb.,.L)V.t eC.r ''`�'L L f,#F v�A JR�'''t? r;� 400 18 e 92.020 EXTENDING APPEALS PERIOD ''' h,, • s aS r �} , FROM 15 TO 20 DAYS il {1` �: h{; Zone Ordinance Amendment (ZOA 4-77) ''” q l s�i ' ' r ;,yy S+t •w riy/Ne -+ , i rwi+' ,.ur mnry �n $S.�Ll'. ,1.,-; F1<.,,L:• ,,.�,4..SYxutsm hu'++Nata,.. uw H+3.-,a•.%-.,..'..tM•..+,....,wut l''.. ,,,-.;a::ni.,v..L=..a.tt«:......,.„.„ ..,«�,,...,u.=.-,..,..+',._y,.:.:w,,,. •t',«-y,`{t,5 ,i t k 5 6 4Y{l. 4 Yy PY J J ft`�yJki k kW{ t'Rr'F t, of �'ht .}{Yj, Tr•; art ,ft}:, ,..7:,.,1.;..:.7,.1:. dv IJA ,. 7jt4 X'f It ,";',.,,ht'. r�,�{{�� t RL, {{ 3�x v r ,t,::,,,,,,..,-,,,,,,, '*r ti; la 1,. ,-,t,..,.....}t 1-.,:,-,:,..,,,.., - - x r '>t: roi i'' y X lt3 �1' ,a w": MA Y4 ,tea e s �4�r� {yam, ), S3•, ',.. 1 ^ t t yt, ,..`,,•-•;.,:t t1 i �': ;,.err, : '. `'itC ;7 - ,t ,F Z 'S r'.; F ti 1� ,J ..y {,, i(,.i• .t l' 3 4 Y iµ, 1,f rte}, C'S ' t•. t ti}v,,r k1 f 171. t r. , .r. N � ..t r;v ..+ .. ] . f k:'',..1::::' f ... 4 .4x .,.. w...... x. ti ,:.. �.. �f , .!_ ..i ,. rv11 } ., . r .1 ff. t.. , 4 <.. l .r z. ._. ..T4. r,. •y :r• w c r ., s4 ,. .. .,� .. �.. .��... ....t ..,w _. ?�. .::...r' S :fti"i J :ti%• , ,. _. .. , , .,... > s. ., ,^ ,^ � tit ,. ... .. _ ....s . ..?., '�.. ,. .o. .f... < . ..., .- t e•r 3., . n. .t o o aro .K r sf.,. . ..v ,. ,tA xZ s ,.+. ?' _.,.s ... t> ,:., ,.,. 4 A _xa- ., z ,r. .. Sl .. ,...f , rA.,,.. ,.Cblr,S.� , .j . , .. .`:`+r,,, sn ..rr 4 . y.., y... • . 3. ., f. #. a. j,,. ) � .. a 1.,.... r. ,...4 . , ;:h .. ,>.- . .-x t t .:. .., t.s: � 1. 'pl. ..,'{„ _ �� . ♦ •.-,L i .t,... . .. <4:. , tF, x � . J '. f n 4 , Ala . .-. ,. ,... �.,.7. i s.lY n... , { •. SAS u... u:.,.,, . . ., a 1 .: _ .;�. tk. d S¢r , > I- .,1 ,. 'i `t ,. .,. -r. ,:: .�J r... r,....w. ... . ?�.. 'v -t . , , lf. . .. . ,. ... ... i. 1 f .t .. ... . .. :. i . . ..4Y-.. � i ..4 Y.1. „ ,L { .i1 . .6 .r kx .at:�(a� y t ,� ,.Y�. 54 ., .. r , r X . ,e JY ..t ,r + ]r �ik ,t- if 'i#.e't �. >..,hi`4#:i ..� S.y,� .. .It. r:ti; a ..,.. x . -].. Fr .aH ., wt . af. .t Y t -,'f rt , ., .f. ,. i..A }'?, ,a.i k .c.. 4 a . a ,. R ,., .. x ... .,, S. ,. ,.. ?t' ♦..,,. �,,v:.b. . ^,ys .., 3 ... .R. ..,tx ,. e .. ..i. s :,... .. ... N> ,.1 ao,. .. . � .4..>.�. ,}.. a '`3'( �+{ Y a....w4. 74, �7 ... � L, . {{ S1 .... , .-...s.,., �. R. �f 4 . . -,s , .. .K:} .,r t4; +-,.._..... ....- ii' 'F1t' "R ,CFI. ..ift.... k Tot l;� r,... .Yc.. f x.+... �,..:::.,.. `v.:t,� ..x ...,y l ,x}. �..�.,:.. 3._.,,. : .. r ... .t),h,,,.�....7 ,... .r..... . ... ..Rf c..v1+:...,7.. ..� ,.., ��i?a`� .. te-t.:•. ., n nh R�rv...ft.rt'i' . ^3. ..._ s ..au4 °"�. ;1i 3 ? a xZ X•} CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ; Fait; ORDINANCE NO 77- X, At. nk -rr. z AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 18.92. 020, 18. 58. 020, AND 17. 12 .030(D) 4; OF THE TIGARD; MUNICIPAL CODE TO EXTEND THE APPEALS PERIOD FROM TEN 5_ I AND 15 DAYS TO 20 DAYS FOR CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION, AND DE-- "z` SIGN REVIEW BOARD REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS REGARDING SUB- M j: DIVISIONS, MINOR LAND PARTITIONS, DESIGN REVIEW, AND DECLARING AN 4 EMERGENCY. O. vex }}{gyp ,$ THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS ;FOLLOWS r>t'; SECTION 1: Finding that 227 . g pursuant to Chapter 22 � ORS and Ordinance ,- No . 68-48 (City of Tigard Subdivision _Ordinance of 1968) and Ordinance 75-52, the hereinafter stated amendment to said ordi- nance, pursuant to prescribed procedures, were submitted to public ,r7 £;4 hearing held by the Tigard Planning Commission on May 17, 1977 and to the City Council thereafter recommended that said subdivision and n,j },Lrf zoning ordinances be amended as hereinafter set forth . sx' rfi SECTION 2 The City Council further finds that the ur p ose for this amendment is to protect the public health safety, and general welfare and, furthermore, said amendment serves to assure ' adequate time for City Council review of decisions by the Design Re-= view Board, Planning Commission, and. Planning Director. rs`zH+ �+y SECTION 3(A)That, therefore, Chapter 18. 92 .020 of the Tigard Munici- 44 pal Code be amended to read as follows : a. "An action or ruling of the Planning Commission authorized , ' by this title may be appealed to the City Council within 20 ,E days after the Commission has rendered its decision by fit- �cz ing written notice with the City Recorder. Notice of ap- peal shall state the name or names of the petitioner, date, �r and action of the Commission being challenged and the rea { sons for such an appeal. A fee may be established by the City Council to defray the cost of by uu preparing a verbatim , transcription of the Commission hearing If no appeal is yam, taken within the 20 day decision `' y period, the decision of the Commis- sion ss,on shall be final . If an appeal is filed the Council �: ��"`• . P p shall receive a report and recommendation from the Planning #fix�, - `• Commission and a verbatim transcript of the hearing before ` the Commission and shall hold a hearing on •the record es- 9 its= tablished before the Planning Commission . Notice of the Yr{; public hearing shall be by one publication ,in a newspaper `rx of general circulation in the city not less than five days days and not more than ten S a prior �t .o the date of the hearing. b. The City Council shall have the ower to * p call up ' any action } or ruling of the Planning Commission for' hearing and review g by the City Council . In any instance in which the Council . t. O?OINANCE No. 77.50 r r._ ..:. n_ _..:. e•r .K.:, r' 3.. .vt,?Jw"' �xv'.':°1!.. .. .- mnv ....«.. ..... ...._,.�: .. ,.. '-,,. . ..t t- r i-. 4'h •,. ..'?......i ;`'�.., ac;».., a i'...•-,. ... .-... .. ., �t -» ... .; .S •". a l.,,it.ftP... ,....Y.�, #Y k . ., ..... .. ..t ...n .:5 ,...7,..4.r-. z. .. .Y. ,.......1 r 7, .,d7 h., ,,d....r K...t... .. .f .,1.i... ..,Y. b. s. t.., x., +u .:t: ?:+• f.t 3.....Y � v ,.... 1 ! t,n. ..a x,. t..z c.. , •. ,�„ �.. ,.n„ x ? a_.r,.f.. vl.n t{ r ,... + 1.. «i r..... M !. :. E rc .:•. --aX., Y.' ''Ft' 1 '?m. ti,.., ......,,.1+ ...,r 7..�,,. ,..,, r ....,. , ,.. H ..:, a.2 f- +n.� ,,.,..i,_..F .' "1. x x 1._ .. .. �r. .. ..t t t� .:,. ... ... 7� ard�:H .�< Y S •'3 S �"'- ^,. '5. r} .... �d....:...vt.,.:,,�......, ...nt a..,.µ-•:..n.»,,. .,_]+,c>,...c>.R..+..,�.i..,,,�S.v r,.r �-+.,,.;,... i .. t:..f.t,�,1...:,t''• .�,n..�,.x f,r« P..,.,. ..r� r r .:...r.. _. ..,.... ...z1 fi,Sz,.. ., .,..t>'ra.E?.v.wlv.a 1;.........�"i ,t a,.. ..,... ,,.M M',.,�t, ..te... ar, t+�{, sit z . i t::,,,, ', + fit. y i tit '* exercises its power to call up a legislative matter, the -, *} `Y'` Council shall decide at the time it sets the matter for pub- ' ; lie hearing whether new testimony shall be received or the s . s4; ltl , . matter heard on the record as in appeals pursuant_ to Para-- ' ,.iy ` graph a. above. If new testimonY is to be allowed, the no- i+,, tice of public hearing shall be written so as to inform the >x public of that fact." x1; (B)That, therefore, Chapter 18'. 58.020(C) of the Tigard Mu- ;, nicipal Code be amended to read as follows r ''` C. "Appreal : Action of the Planning Director or his agent ;ter may be appealed to the Design Review Board by the appli- ,p i cant or adjacent property owner provided: �}x' l',, ' a. The appellant deliver to the Planning Director a ' written notice of appeal, stating his reasons for 'iF z appea]. based upon the criteria of Chapter` 18.58. f d.. >E x 1 b. Said written notice of appeal is received by the�Y ',,i. '; Planning Director within 20 days of the applicant 's , receipt of notice of action by the Planning Direc- as '.i for or his agent .,, .,, ,\ 4..4'i (C)That, therefore, Chapter 17.12. 030 of the Tigard Munici f,' pal Code be amended to read as follows 1 A. The Planning Director shall have all the power and 44t �r duties with respect to preliminary and ,final plats y Aj of subdivision and maps of major and minor parti ' ' '' tions3 in accordance with the procedures related. .', ,j " thereto, which are authorized by Oregon Revised „cry; �a '�,.. Statutes and by this title, and the City Council re- 4 'r serves unto itself the right to exercise equal ;Yr P powers and duties in any given case, at its option. ,, t B. Approval by the Planning Director of subdivision : ,�. and major and minor partitions of land inside the SST boundaries of the city is required in accordance . "} with this title before a plat for any such subdi�vi- �r p Y Jzk sion or a map with respect to a major or minor par , ;, tition may be filed or recorded in the *County' re ' 1rx cording office and the City Council reserves' unto '"; * ,; itself the right to exercise equal powers and duties {,,� ` in any given case, at its option. ' t .,,x C. Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Planning 's Director in 'approving or disapproving any subdiv ,- { sign, major or minor partition proposal may appeal ;., sL ,h decision to the Planning Commission by notice .f ,:, ;:0- ,;:0 served upon and filed with the City Recorder within. *' , I; 20 days after the date of such action of the Plan-- '. ning Director from which the appeal is to be taken =_ r : r ORDINANCE No 77-50 5, TS ,. �, 1ox'i�it ca to sUZ» �' ;! i Hry,ti x r '- s« ', ; Er'•Y�Z ,v "4+'+i 7" ,'1q'4",'"frt'."-';".0 -.,1,1em�1r*: .,.?!"+ xenwa+ ?yy�nd.a.,«d wlR:v,.+rsn .. ,..,. .t> tw. n,.�.4 . y, .. ,rn.... . x..t. „.. , �'`5..... 4..... .� f.,. +. •; ..� -f r.•:.? .,�". x�n . .tV.�Y,7i:.'nW�bh ❑r,. ,a+: 7 . . ..�.... i' k. .r. s .. �3 .. •...- a .. ' f . 0 ..ti u' - 7` _ w( ^Ft'� t -t- .qzi .�} ..Yi{.3,..\.�a�n:��?�u.s F:..,;.,..J ..., H:.t �.:, -. S � . ...y .. '�I' :... .: � �:1 � C- T �t 4� Ca5 !. . ;..r�,t Vin:4 ..;...:,`,.'''.1.',.1`,.'`....' +" F..4.� 'Y � I n.� T 3 rh' .� to 3a � L`+ kt" M -A . � k1 + ti:���J.,? ;-:5`.,�>�q7'. �+,z� r+l(� „�>�-i r;K {: a•''+ �' ty� '��''��t`���`��'��L�'b�%...jr t�JeZ 'a Yr�r+"�4� S j<�,1cf 3 14 4 yL x e Y°3�'l�.Xd?4�>'{F, F d 4�„�'"i t,x a ....ti r h� � w.,m.l;ib v a',.�G'1•�°u.x �Y�-t.4_:!;�3 _2,"tar.,.,.v..wf�s e<�S" n? Yas. 5. , �� fk A; +� ti iy' ) D. Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Planning ,,. Commission in approving or disapproving any subdi- ? d. vision major or minor partition proposal may ap�- Y, peal such decision to the City Recorder within 20 days after the date of such action of the Planning Commission from which the appeal is to be taken . kT SECTION 4: Inasmuch as it is necessary for the peace, health, and 4;k ;iXNl safety of the people of the City of Tigard that the fore- - going become a 1 g g cnan e g permanent part of the City ' s records, an timer= ;{ gency is hereby declared to exist and this ordinance shall be ef- u fective upon its passage by Council and approval by the Mayor. }z PASSED: B.. unanimous vote of all Council members y present, after be- i7x ing read three times by number and title onl this xt day of \ 1977 { s Y n 3 I _ gh�<, Recorder. City of 'i,° r ^ Irt�x. APPROVED: By the 1' ayor this c,2 7 day of lc-c � e , 19rr',/• ry. rf e fT: Say Mayor - City of Ti Bard Mu'i, T S: f:n Ury: yf)t 7,'i t eF V. ie ORDINANCE No. 77-50 jkYV fk[IItiZ. f 7 ,:,� .:' .._ S �, �:r2 , .u1'NS ry_ ..1:. :R+�l � :,.. ,i.� / ..•y .' i {�A,Y''k � \ Y i M ,!:' .fA k� .. � ,:. -?nY!!!. ....Fclte gw�ae,.+t"i Y`}-�jt•'V,C'w :.b" { rnwjHRa!+f .. '�"_.ztifB;F"?fi R� S:`�Q n:. t� ,.A2�Waw l tt en +IR°�. rv, .,. ...., _S .. . ..- ''>.,....�..'�[, x„:,.,,, .. �. ..,.. _.. 2:K"•,s f�d. i .: 9..�1,.!ru 3. ... 4. �-, .. k..R. ,. ., -i... �;, F t 1 .Y. �.Y .[. Y ;S.3`y7!r t,.. ,. <, 8_. .. ,s{ ,. ,.,. 'Y:....:.w ,>,. n �#'.>.:.... ...4.,. ... .. .:.... .,: ... .,h„ 1. ; .firer•,,.1� a,��� te- tr r��' '.1 t .:.,.:. n r,-a r �,lJn: ,.. � ..,}. ,..,�f. '.. .v.. �L.t.. ...s._r fit., :., � ♦-ryf ..,.��,_..R.,a 4 v. ?. .-v� �`f .:t-R .�..� i,k .X,, R...��'. �-fin ,. .,....... ..�.,,.-_.kr,.<.�. ry.,�,_-„�..,r1'_t k.,�,.�:.., ���f.,.,.,.�,._...,a*.,..�. .�,��.�. z .,.._ sir-..., .. :.�..:� ...�,_!. ,.L..r�-c,rir,,. \,.., i,.� :�;.,r1.�.t.•a..., ..9 .„,�...,. ,_"\t... ..<:G,. .,.. _,,, 'sd,,.. L.. s. G .'tt1,, i;t:2„Iss )' 1'Sri '''.• ' ' iCE -,-.'.. ,:;';'':',( ty ! S 11 fit Mfr i STAFF REPORT y� '4.AF" AGENDA: 5 .6' gr a,�>r ,',,, TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION '�F,1` {: May 17, 1977 7: 30. P.h2'. q` Fowler Junior High School Lecture Room, F 10865 S .W. Walnut Street - Tigard Oregon ,1 t. , r ti DOCKET: ZOA 14-77 , -' REQUEST: Taw amend Section 18.92 .020, Section 18 .58.020, and Section -,,,,„ is 17.12. 0 3 0 ',�ti (D) of the Tigard Municipal Code to extend the �Ai'4 ;; appeals period from ten and 15 days to 30, days for City rf appeals rte Council, Planning Commission, and Design Review Board re- ,, its view of administrative decisions regarding subdivisions, minor land partitions, and design review Aga -, .'41,,.4 ,' APPLICANT: City of Tigard frt 'ti:. ,'' I . BASIC FACTS : ,. his= 1. 18 .92. 020 (A) of the Tigard .Municipal Code reads as follows 4 ,,.�,. "An action or ruling of the Planning Commission authorized... ,; by may be appealled to the City Council within 15 ;' b this title ma t.; ,,k: days after the commission has rendered its decision by fil- 4:_-, ng written notice with the city recorder, Notice of appeal >;r. ' shall state the name or names of the petitioner, date, and , : i.,, action of the commission being challenged and reasons for }`}' such an appeal. The fee may be established by the City ,.; te - Council to defray the cost of preparing a verbatim trans-- , s cript of the commission hearing. If no appeal is taken ' ''A ; ' within the 15 day period, the decision of the commission ,); `F, shall be final ' If an appeal is filed, the council shall re �.-' mot, , ,-., ceive a report and recommendation from the Planning Commis- t r ,,,' sion of a verbatim transcript of the hearing before the corn- }Y' :,', mission and shall hold a hearing on the record established {1l= before the Planning Commission . Notice of the public hear- +,i! -,-,\,- �, , ing shall be by one publication in the newspaper of generala"' t,1 4 •circulation in the city not less than five days and not more `t` i 4 than ten days prior to the day of the hearing. '" - ','-1'..r.',. ,11 2 . Section 18'.58. 020 (C) states : `' . s iy Any action of the planning director or his agent may be f`� ,. appealled to the Design Review Board by the applicant or ad- r e ' jacent property owner provided the said written notice of ap- ',M' t` peal ' is received by the planning director within 15 days of {}; 7i4,. i„ ^ the app).acant ' s receipt of notice of action by the planning Y.= s -,;' director or his agent. ” x, 5r . r (H. ;1�Ji4�;(:.. gam°'; ORDINANCE Noe 77-50 .;' iIYS#t9 1, =S5: }rc r k9 d`y`y , fYi k w> �� : .. ..,• •:., cr.� , 4 ax7,...1.�' .r. .S ,9 ,.. )F x,.r ....., , ... _., ,:. ... ' .,. .s .s K, M :,,. .s.... n,... ♦... N, t iS°a•,o .., e. ifl' ..7 ...o .t'! . a a a . €:..'- t :7'i .,. ,. .I. .. .}" :.,, a .Tt, J,.ti �.., r. *;t'. .. �, ,, ._ . S ca" r:!"5 .cz. . a., , .r . ,. . w.. ,, ...w �,,,.,.L; , .- t o. ...,..✓ *, dri ih t�. SYr >» -It 1::.. 7 r a -f Y:. >r`,,. .. 55 ,..t} . . f.. Y. t:.,... ^R,•• +.U , ,y.« ='• ,s,« A ■A....411'•Ys tY�.. ,,$ t4. . r...a,.n F4k,�*�. ,tea+r ., ,: t, x,t ,�.� . 1, s, .... ..:., C h,r„a ro, r , ,... '.'c .Y .{ ..s .z�: 'V . . .....tc...> xt.. + t�[ ', ..t ,...>. .. _. . , 4.,:...- .. h �.,.- f. :.. �'. ,. :.. ..,Y., .i' �... 3 ro. t,. ., 13 , ,,...,. .,a ,...Y . .. »:, y.-. ,d , .V ... ..- h � -.. t ,....a?� kl. S. : 1' ,»ks.p 4f.;,V. r5: fn.: r^wa.■� �k,--t x ., ..fl . i a•,t..a 4ar h.. .. � :.$1, �;�.ztr . � �e �,.� au � r. .r �:_ ,k �, ,y �.. .b +;F.t,, '�{ t•a f a a, 1p .-, .y;,.?S r •n E .s`� x � 3 {f k a,. 5+,., x�i',4 a, 1`+_ ..:y- ;+�i a i W ! x „tiru� a�G, 3 xr°n,�">#t lr >r�k h y w �, 'E� t s,,t1 J .,.. ,.F. r?:aiY a7':'�'._.`ak,r� .,... ,a ,°'�'i x�'Su1;Y'°{ ! t�;Y•;-aVwr7 i„i�il tr} Stti'ff {.�Sn a as3 s�a i N ^'~{ . fttu r. ,...,',1„„, r^ -1,r STAFF REPORT ,1- f,'.:. iF AGENDA 5.6 r {.s< TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION .. f` May 17, 1977 - 7: 30 P.M. h7, F'3' Page 2 h s f e, 3. Section 17.12. 030 " (D) states S., �o' 1. ,h,. L Any person aggrieved by a decision of Planning Commission in `j` Syr approving or disapproving any subdivision, major or minor fi. ' partition proposal may appeal such a decision to the City ; Council within 15 days after the date of such action of �, ,3, the Planning Commission from which the appeal was to be ,v „.�' taken. " .1,:,.., y. tyY( �. 4 City of Tigard Resolution 77-43, which establishes City " i1�: Council , Planning Commission, and Design Review Board re- „ %i; view of subdivision, major and minor land partition , and `` ;'r4 design review approvals, handled administratively by plan- ; s ning director, requires that the planning director notify ,,.� each of the respective boards within 14 days of final ac- M<<< a '1.- tion . 1I . STAFF OBSERVATIONS } With a 14 day notice to the Planning Comm?.ssion, City Council , < s° 45}; Des .gn Review Board of final administrative actions by the Liz planning director, it was a concern of the council that with ��A � day spare -��� ',,{ only one da to s are after that notification the respective might i�rbodies not be p rovided an opportunity for review. ��'>�, li= Positive aspects of the proposal are to provide a two-week de 33t cision period after receiving notice by the planning director L' X;< of a final action in which to consider whether the respective '': t*`r r.. it:� board or commission would wish to review the proposal c. r!"+ Negative aspects of the proposal are that it would increase the .. ,; ''x period of time in which a project could be delayed or stalled-- k ' xf: kr. in some cases up to 60 days.. .t,1, ' P yr !x . r :' III . STAFF RECOMMENDATION �' '. ,'141. }, Staff recommends that a standard appeal period of 30 days a}'7 h3{,, for all Planning Commission, Design Review Board, x=;1. and planning director administrative decisions be incorporated �� into Sections 18..58, 18.92, and 17. 12 of th-�� Tigard Municipal 4�� Code . x �s k, s ¢.Y .x J'P- , i:`tt. ...<..,..g........1.,»...:.....,,.i-.......n... .:-.....,... ....,,..t.......,..... .,..-,,.".....,..+......:.-:.... ,ff.-..,...:.,...........;.....,:...:. ,- .i....:........r.....,..........,:.. ...... ....•,.... e.. ..,. ;.,.. ,..:..,.........,,..„. .,r.:.....-,„,...... .........._.„.........,,. ,...........s...,,-.'..t,........: :. ...,.,.....,........_... ....,.. ,'. ........ . v..,-.. ..''.:.,.,...• z.. ..,. � ,. ...,.. ..'.::. .,. a3-•,'i:.. r� .{1+ ..fiL ry Xt=xYyt;x< r 1 #Z!��i"r.te:}.3 t t„„C O,;,1xt Pd°t T}� 3 iN+t,:, ,4,, t!.f._�?T'�?�S_}':'.�'rA.�E'7..,;i 1”}rd r i' ' i�ir 1�,'3, . ��i E:-4.�gg{d�,'x",J sx S 7 r�Sk r{t•s,ci3,<'.�w L��,,�GcS�r ..,.r<..ii ir.x r r r rJ..<.4: c r iy}zf�A t �,�<.�W�.r<;s.< .�...i .<._.�`L r 4 3 1 9t. .< < t+1<..N,....<�{a.r„'i�,. oa s..f r.s�wi i1.-r*<,,}x.Y..t.1..1 knr,.. 1r i et4 w r l v F.)., .r_..ta.1,,,,L..,,,�<x.�r A g+w e},}..P...s.bry x<.r.,r,t rti<a.+.a.r el..,.,„<a.sYxi f i,.,.r.6 at yr 74 tc..;<,r.!cc,l�i.'.r9k d:,1«�.x..,,,,,,.,,,‘,..,4,,,,,,...,,...,,,,,,,'3J,r<,k. -w.J, ,.y 1.ff '4'.,'I''''-:'''''., :f3ar ... :tL t'v.7+�n ,.. YJ 9 t t ryi , R , } MINTJTES 5, TIGARD PLANNING- COMMISSION May 24, 1977 - 7.:30 p.m. p '$ Page 6 L•k qtr; t s o That under the flood plain ordinance fencing would not be permitted: r y ti 0 Discussion on Tepedino recommendation o Wood stated that a 5, 000 square feet minimum lot size [.. was a reasonable request . 0 Staff suggested that Condition1 be amended to read; "by an engineer with demonstrable expertise in "Hy- dro1ogy" rr o Daniels stated that the cul-de-sac would exceed 400 ng feet but would be listed as code deviation Goldbach moved and Sakata seconded based on staff find- c�^Yr. 3 ings with the staff recommendation to read 1 "by an engineer with expertise in hydrology . " rs 6. The dwelling units adjacent the northern boundary be detached dwellings ark rr,. fill or construction allowed in the flood plain 7. No f i s �tt 8. Minimum lot size of 5, 000 square feet The motion was approved by unanimous vote, with TepedinQ 3 F; abstaining. : 5 .6 ZOA 14-77 ;'4 ra $ A request by the City of Tigard to amend Section 18. 92.020 ft= 18. 58.020, 17.12 . 030(0) (appeal to City Council) to extend A. the appeal period from ten to 15 days to 30 days for City ' Council review of subdivisions, minor land partitions, and. � rY V design.J review. jr{ r t$ ;45: ,' A. Staff Report ' o Read by Daniels f'f B Public Testimony '5,, None ,;l`• r sirw ORDINANCE No. 77-50 .r • i'Y't r tF�i! * .>.,. ...-:r J : '.�:." h »'•. ,'rfiti?!...y. ,` � 1�•• ^•dd.Y:c` A. M::d 3Y is { � 5.k `C.it t � >•� t7C' ,t. ...: ., ,. ... , . .. ...•♦�'tL....v ...... , ,,. tl ..._ .'.,�, ..... .. ._ . ........ :""1. N. ,S•' iY ��. 1r, 1 �< ...r . a..... -..,. ...y :[ .h n...t�r.0 ..2,.f. ... 1.l .t..? .. .. -. ...t • .,....... •C.J C.. KV�...h .. .... l,.,s 4c Y } .0 r.�, 3. .. R. .-... .: .. ,. [ �... .r.., _ G....., .. .a.3 , R. r. •1.. >,., ...,+,'ik tb .,,1 r�)r h..Y 1. >�,. �..� 'I• 'd ,. .,.r L. t?t ... ..a,.o. a...... w. ,.a .2 t. ,G.. ,.,7 ...2..,?. .-,....,.. _ .. .fi r. J: 1 !. ).t- '� �•s. �+.:?..�:A . .,,:._..+., :.,..Y.. .,srs4+...N,v.n. k „..-..:ti,... ....., n.,�'.".. r7......�,s...... r�r.:,u .. .::. ..=s.�..,.,. .. :...... ..-., �•,_.t.,,1;, ..r..�•..+.,f.,'.:�,,.x.. ..3.,...,•3R<�1;...,. ..�,-..r±,..,. ..,�w. .r+. °-.f,,. ,.1,'�4. e✓. ..:.�,,., Mx..,rtit`a!,ri stxs. .,,. vv 545 .,tx r MINUTES ' TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION May 24, 1977 - 7: 30 P.M. Page 7 `5( ^� M1 •S C. Staff Recommendation : y; Staff recommends that a standard appeal period of 30 1: i . days for all Planning Commission, Design Review Board, t planning � ^l7 2 co Sections 18.58, 18 .92 and .1 of the and olannin director administrative decisions be in- ,, p rated into Section 18 .92, ;rt Tigard Municipal Code. 1 r., rk D. Commission Discussion : P }tit , t a Commission discussion on notification and appeal o Wood questioned the time period. �w �y eras r 0 Wood and Goldbach stated that the 30 day period ,,. e would be in conflict with the intent of shortening ix iM the process time . tk o Staff changed recommendation to 20 days Goldbach moved and Sakata seconded for approval based on staff `finding and with the staff recommendation of a 20-day appeal period ; . .qty The motion was approved by unanimous vote tY. 5 . 7 Park Sites and Development Standards A. recommendation by the Park Board to adopt the proposed N r } park and open space system, standards, and selected future tt sty park sites. `.t o Ben Altman, staff representative, presented the proposal . o Wood questioned the City 's hesitancy to condemn property 4' for park use and inquired if the City Council had taken r�G ,w1 ,; a position of non—condemnation procedures for the ,acqui '{ qr sition of land for park _use• �tL x 1 �? o Altman stated that the intent is to acquire park sites { ' with the least amount of adverse reaction, j. �� t.• .,� o Popp stated that park standards and site selection would be discussed in a pub] is hearing at the next Planning Com- , �4> mission meeting. T 6. OTHER BUSINESS : None . 7 ADJOURNMENT: 10: 15 . fRi.. g �x rw , ORDINANCE No 77_50 �' it'•f',iNf - i.:,� .r. t-•i r. ....y ;y,:�.. ti ... i_ :., 4 YY ti:i4k t.1 Kn k :21 1.1, lv/'.,>,tY -:((y. ..... �:... ... _. - _: s x.a, ",r r'.w ..yr. ., is � .t.� .ir.:x..- - .!..,`a }. _ � -.. '-•,.. .r,„. s � ..� -'av t.f.,s:. U a„�+.t.,n,_ L, ..:...- .. .. _t.t , .{r. ...ti .�... l.�.C..: ,.. ,Y S.F 5., .p S r 4'.:.. f. ,.. 77 :.. *•�+r..., ,''{,'n ... tr... w i.1..rJ of v::4,f,wt”, >.`r. :f . _ t n.. 'S.:Y,t. 't . { ,:..,. 4. _ .. .o . ref,. ♦,4a . ,, •. 4 k.., \ +' :f �'k T a .x.}r.. ,A. ..,<,.,.,. ...F. .r. ., .*57 .tx. n ...,.:. . ._ .. , . . .. ..s'.„....:i .•u, :'Y-. nY. ., e.. .rr, �•.g! .. ., . .y• ., . .,: .. . ., . ....,-..1.r .. .. ....t.t. ...,. u... v.. :3 r: -J r1 . ,.. ,.. .. t1.:Ian: t. ::;,, -•h�`1t't_„rl;.' a *.,.,; t:..:.- f N-t:... > ,:�'.s v ..t#. it T _}..4„ti �PF' r �.,. ,:4��.IS, a'..r.a.,:x='., .,r... i�e. �t, ...>s�.+. T4� � � y x''� iti r 'h T � �� �Ct r. ��Lr•[ rn F.?:cry .:.�"'�"C: 12 ,,eE,,.,"}r�,, .'�.r.,.,, .. ".r� S,.x....M.i 1 S. ..:':.? U .i „M.rrtyf5,i.v ,.:.;•,..i>•..e. 1.z.... .- �: is due r. by tk ,1 ., •.. .:v... -..,.; w w L,.. rl>+ .... .. a .-: ....+ sau:..t x.„:.... .4 I,'_. - r'T. _ , y� - C. } yk r. , "M t S. :,1 AGENDA ti}� '« TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION may 17, 1977 `- 7: 30 P.M`. it Page 2 Y. 4ts - n fir'. NPO I I �,. 5.5 CONDITIONAL USE 12-77 (Hammett) conditional use per- Health Club for a con ��• A request by Tigard t,t mit- to locate a health spa .in The Tigard Plaza (Wash. Co . ;'` Tax Map 1SI 35D1), Tax Lot 3301) 5-,.` ONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 14-77 ` { ray A request by the City of Tigard to amend Section 18.92. ,f (appeal to City Council) to 020 ' 1$ .58 .02Q, 1?. 12 .030(0) ( pp y extend the appeal period from.m, - 15 days to 30 days for City 'Council review of subdivisions, minor land par- �x titions, and design review F. - � x • R . n �r: l5 +(R! { 4 4. • 1r Li' in C:(• ?;`Fit 4-'+l p i �a:• iw 1 1, ,?y ORDINANCE No. 77-50 Y, :j '✓ i' Y is il.°+u'HY .•.xuarSA C"P.. 'q'ti'rtrx. r/.:TP4'fYr'.. ._,'•o'ry<3f1e1.. •c k C F 'S i 4„4 ;'ti •i '�,`..' :.:5 kt r:T ,4'.}i ..> .. .�7 .f,5aa. R.�^... F` .,a :�sRN .,. •*C°.i. 'N'�...�+�etr3 ,. _..t,- ,F„«. + .'x. ,x�,�. {F. .. ::�. F. ._'�'P-.EY..X. r,, ,r.t_ .'"tY ,......, .r , .' ..1�-�Y��4i ' .: "_ _ f�.>•_..., ,. ...r.-e .>... �!ti. ,v� 4 Li-. t. r r.�a,���i"Ff". zCi'"�i', i.,.r x t«.- a 3 ,�f�^^.''ff, .. +.S 4. t iin�nn r t t. .. : cv ..+p .,.-� •,,_. 1: r e tt r .r k.,F. ..... :,. ,.... ....<, .• , ,., «....{✓ L•,.< .i.... .. eb Sw,:�fi, ;, .. .... bd 1.t, .�- >�3'.-hEr. �... {,: �-: )t. vT d:>,. _ .P>. a.t : �,. i, . It..,f.. n. a >.4A•. r. 4 .2+: r- ! y.•y. Jk' `i, Y ., .5i. � .,.G y .y..T: ry,,,. .. r 1. `tF...:,, r'....•,.,... 7. t '+.«t -,..y >. ,, 't.,v v:u- r _ 1 :.rn... ,. .., � �l,. . ., v,. .t •.. .k♦ • 4...,-. r ....�.l w. �. .. -. :. 1,+ I :.:. ..ua. r.,ff., .t4. -"+'t tyJ' k-. t^b•. ..,.s _ i,.0 tY w c£'„ .: _u % { k - t .4 �-. ul r. 9r .. H rX, � -,. +�.....,.. ..�i.... �.• >«_. i'.:a.� f.,. >. r•%.. v'. t.>, .tiF.. ..>.,r. t. ... u� t.. it�' , .� -,.=G4 y. t ., t. ...f. ft lr.:: .. ,+f .$ ^,..x 4�.. 1. ,.. 5r ..7_- k ,� •:,YA ..{ .K ". .:f4 } C.4.r J.. , ... \. • I. « ..�.... a �)f :�. ,.. .�' :.d�,k. .4 ,:,«-.• 11. J+ c,....4 �: { Y 1 � {y. .u.,,,rz.,.....:•.>*i...<`�..>1�.,,._, ,r. ,..�•.,...;...,d.>�,�C1:..(...oaf...,..>5,,,...r{..,r...:.,:?r_.. .:.',..,.t�,,,.�.. .ar,..1..�. ,.0 s...�9:,i;„+Si1...._. ,,.,ti,...,c�,,,.1..,'�i.._,rr..?. .,•..ru. ,.. wt ..�,..f.,tY,..,. �.f }Y ,..r .r,: .,....va2, t.:; t•... r.-t., ..�r.'C.'„g. ,. -iF c , i 4 i;j? ��t l�rr r� yi , 1 � fl e r "i ' ''Y 'fir;��ki.- t s4�"4.5 < o- a,i, r : z F.tlr r. 6 't' , AFFIDAVIT r PUBLICATION p..,e,,c-dii,..?„,.,4,-A,Ft&Atairi5,-4...,.z A+L�k h. a,,,'# k °St r:i,+' i 'ate 4.-,,,,,,,t„., t .'' <t� otiie Ash 4,Yr9, t a }p4 1 . . 1t • v, .t,ti ,,,, ; . t a �,v 4{ 9, - STATE OF OREGON ` ►eartn?'" rll ,.; he � U4 tT'fi 1 u s9 is fa a, ' OZ7NTY OF WA HIN TON q�p'� '{ire-i.,1„,% . * ii. �7p,p.#": ;,'"`SS. �" WASHINGTON, 5k11yO 6 ,si# ,j�`I at vvA {.,v.i. �1,-.4i Lt4, iU! Y.'Yfl '4! hN 41+y,F.l '7,1{97'?;,r 4 In a.,y J'�+u F�OO i) ..;•'•� y""q f i• ; 4 nth li.er3Sp ct'lt ,0ie o owing=`*,rl �i t t 4- \ ' Nn4;, 1A � ;s P Far 4 Y ;, qqt�" icy g ��.,,.g t r �tS , � � �k^�AAa r4t,�4 d3 �.wYi hilt +d 4�`� � ��,sl±ltl t4�-j,="= t..- being duly i P that l'am the publisher _,__.__._ .._.______._. .. , ; Mein first du1 sworn depose and say p ., ;,� .- 'cam' rtf y� �C"u�4 'S'"� �3t,r tom`,t�+.zC� ,Z� �",,Y��u��s>s�},���� I+L a�'^. '. r`I' { is ry, =. f t1 �5 ,aV a"Ta,`,.. tt., ¢ __of The Tigard Times, 'a newspaper of gzneral circulation, as defined ; '� 2r05 ,' t =.era i . I t-44t nc� , "11::' >..... + G `-r+�.$_�y"� 1 s t1'9.d[i •4tiS 44 a 1 t, �.:�.'f>ti s = .. a� ��<, s Fk,,:'^91+ir r k. 1 sa by ORS 1$3.010' and 1:93.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and ,ci (ys�o pr*�,, �q� gy A `i Y .. ,•e " r bd' to v, i`i o t40.Q Yr f ti,;,.!...!.,;.:,., ! �Tk t'I r4 � �nc "��x��'� �''-- `-�` �-t� �`��' `t "'�'+�4;t�'tt1 `�^"�' t,.r state that the lc al notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed was t tai§s a ed ter ,x 4 k g ' >x;, � t ,.rf �a 43{17 'f�M ��}5'��'a�k oat`�t"� y�5''�qy�1 ��h y .•y�e f t.S l�Y �. '�ir'���� `�*t4 hfw"e,l �'t71 .'�,pfil�.$.?`7•�.� ���4 , '' Published in the entire issue of said newspaper for -------- successive and 4 ,��� w� Y ', �a ;c n nt r,;1,ra p ,��aine�'to ��`� a�c��" �C��� nt,4f�rr`�g� ,���: !}4S t, - r4 -,:,> -� d b z x t , s,a� 5' r'i 4''T zr`: consecutive weeks in the following issues --- ---- ----•- --•• -------- F; ,r-,. t�4 u"Y t � #'? • r Jule 15 & 22, 1977 Q , .¢ n tit y� Cxt • {,pH,b SSEi}. '�r�,j 11-+�d"�,7�°'� y �Y �F el&7�*J} �'Y�'�Ai�L4'., ��•'�n,,` - - - _ - - -- 4!,0 S6rec% 4f-i1 4.,,- y' `'rr 3 rcet cW s ,, eF«'`-r.•vt � '„ r' .•,.�,�. t.�', „�, .� r, �, _ a' rt i t i Gnu�J�, Co.fCo ,ax1'Ma •i^,GS%4s},3 t 4,TaxpLot�t 50�` : a ,3:^ } 4:,,,,t ti # ;w - - t3 H 31'R ue.. t�`sb -e+l"on 4 ":4:- .1ii i,,,.y: (Sign '11 e) / r akTi r }. ur „t'„;g t �rtrp,yts i =: t ;,a kk',, ,-,''''',z` yt41 i,'}4tS,• "t ,�a T�yf aid l o ©'YA..,, r � eeS ifs z, mcii vl t s ii,�y. ,1 t. y ea•�"'••rw k.* .y y.o I� 4a9� Ct�y'lC �IVt��i narii nma-1 t Y -4 «'gam `Tria'''***, tt:'`4 yry,ut 3.Y x4 sai 'A_',.4R.` ,��kF� ? 6 Al,6bti'Zd3�t t h, 1'r,: GrM' gy 77 Har; '':✓� 8kk "*�.xyi"t�. � � �' r'�r't and7t ..?��*..,�I���xti �,4n v,�A'4��'`�J,�IGP try` l�'i' `�: ~ f-'•l:'�t" this 2 3 :c da of �� 1� o f P ::. .;a :t, aril,. itG, „ b ;Subscribed tnd.s rrorn to before me t is - - Y :, s, y; °# ,y . ,r. f;a,K <,s�f ag r =t onzn . $S�n l . ::t rp. :+1` ••,-•••; ,"I *4>� n.A,i. ! y,•�,,,,�"�'r ^Y „<-rp�,�` q sxt_. �^�r1 t+'�. ,,..:Vii',:?,;. '� ':' M ' .▪. "" I"'y t't'- ri ramify esvr4,entr t�soidth ofrySt 3D,•4r c 5 1: fir!t :'w fi i 9.�.« ,t2,a '° �" � F � .. � i s �� ,y ' ,". yJua�e,,, .:." �n I. t ha oad (tt a i. Cor:k-'Ta xMa.±;125il,t';: ,..0‘,:,,.:< i js-z•" .r_'` -- „ t.4 1 SRI. 4�- 4}d dl;i2 'd >,` M r} ! h .t,.'' ct k, � `� .,a :� .a. -� �,'�.. � ,tv� e, n �', r�.�?l� ��, t�,f+.t ¢ -� ;fit ,w rT" q . k •'4 ,� 4,r ry q � n,�, � v.:� 'e.`a a.F� r«d- 9>^s z+a , ayy }�}�V (may„ (��y �{ y�, j.��c .t t'r a�, 7L ,.k„(.1' .f l� n!. rtro . y�R.S,#, } ,0.0,,Pw U�Y W It g',.'. W �G�54.:i-o i4yy V ,�G., SSL' »{' ', ..a Fa A, M,,0. d ,ti'ty 1 .,,M .�4 ,.,,, ,z',e.: ,, 't." yn:t4..+r r?kp,?t'. ',%.,,, : j rt 'i..' °4 t _�__ �"`' ' ir. h s,':1 4`4 rci4 IR' P t#< f)4 .179.".[- { i; u 0,. •> �� Pipe c. of Oregon �;ii ' 1- n,.� r{z� �Tq�t�. �° e�'; Notary ��am��t�e�a�'to �'a g���'t `'ins was°,des "�� s ; : �t �,ign.ati'o�'i� i� ,���`�sf����°��� �"������;� �za�: }" ▪ t. t":.~ .9 & � x� '.oCi i,::::1 ig ro's.,onug '-4{t'? .ky my 'commision.{expires - - 1.. 19 -,,e SL._,. 1ea a`tnd y _ e'sflc e u�'j t �.o ao-� ' >?; ,'' i S 1 ` �i•j'_;nanx rho.id;nk as`h,,Coy ,axl=e r' , ,�"oa u2S d+ '�"�1 i,t4+ '°LOt; V,}k*AI� 4:,9i},.w�'F`t 4` Neu Lf rrT z ''�' t � gw,�l1�l �xy�(`i�'r� �i���+`�4 kf1�� � 5�4 .'j�. �,�ri,. tgi Eg,4er'4 or to zonef reap-,anio stmt! - sf� to change the tz-onin tdesrg aatiQn- romp ' t• � w00 non�o tyzori gs"3p.'4 bo ; 1 Cat[ arch x tt}t�f � 1 d.F�5 t ,,,a,��Y1`fF ,.���,'.�l��l�� 3'p ;t7�l tY� F3♦�� ! �rl '. Family li,esidei ,4tt ati,9795 s� C{ ;ra . 'ing-aStreeFt,-( ash. Co, Tait ap',251 � , u E al: k � ,fi t; h t NE ANG $0t1 st by Ab ' , iret- mpk e or> eneral la aid r+o.!t ; ',,,4,- gram review of lroposd five(5) u: • A- plex p*an ital,, a 'lo m'e'nt I 1 apL 7"f r r •# • t , Single.a r i o40.0n� 41*i 6 I t R r 93th.x Aver '(a as Co ax ap S :,t '-'...',...',/.a,' 3 D,Ta hot; OO) -„ . t;i I , '4 k t; • ques b"" e nat a yl eia a c y z { . Hof T and R 7,Single Fa kllit- sid ern-. } T ' w '-,41V, ' :' 4t14.1 5',Fon t �receri ly,anne c , , ail. t el�,,'+4:7 9ed ;WashAitigton'1`-'bunty J 4,.-'razzz {F; ,00n the orth ide ofi S.W-6''`Duh^^^YYYa___YY S - toad,{1w,we'st; faS.W. SthirAve ,ue..W 't:fr -` ' ' tCo ' ax<l ap> $ 71 �R x` 0 000 ski :'••••1-" Ia dr 0`). t tsr ` fi °;,' '•s � " . :t {!PEAL. NCO DITIO AL SE ' !fly g C L equ�stt•tp y ,rEa gate,' date Knott a�. qtr " ' 4,onditional4use,permit{tote mode{ a id t ';., ;., l'e'tparia f '}ie my theatre .t la , 0'''N4/4•-''i'i' o� 3, 5j. ;1 t - ! acffi .Hi hw y>? as�h.co; it 4A t il.v..• ,�, ;:1�39D ' ax Lot 5t 0). ' }� �t,tr tk rit F x-. ! �'f '�p'aS" ptpy} p��.�r�'!,l i"`ski kt.y�y`,t z fi qr.:. l 5,t1 i 1 Z$ LA Oy rdeh of i� a4 m�'. ? ! z''n ?t" -"t1F rr>f�j {. '�(�yly'i� a a 4t% ,.,, '1 yhz'nom' 't �, t"T ,. rfWeu!ofias!,IL J41Ja '',:•.• u4r•r. � �"�.,qtr t a.J*y�'i$�'j,e s�F r. > s r ,`G. s.,: i�tin ,,tr'4 4,-Mi y F t,t;. t- >5 City ecorde i,, eT 444 °� hlish` un "15` 2, i9',')¢' ' s ke,`w.mr.am,-u_rs 'e z L'i' t't4 ,u<+ s, ,i s x°E ' .. .. . , ,..,, i,, .t .u ;#. : P"rz7 r. NM � ;., ..:.. .,.o-a -. +. 4i? 1+ .•Ce r... r, .y, .a .4 • ,. Y 1. a,. _. .»_. , ..3,Wit'? .. :N•-z� _ !... yt*.. .,'�.:�.:""_' ^Y i5,•'. '� ..., , i• "..9..✓ Vii. 's a. , -�.�,.: ,.s. i. ,- ,.'w'.':TtS,,5+*. '3.f.�'R:'. ... •�". , �"._. ;`l'?'?'4" , � T2'� .. v.+..'.. ... 37av"x. W . .... ...-. _ _. ., a ,� £x' .. . .... .... , ... . ...`�""nt"°`q ..., _.. t+o. ��.�p.�.. w.. n .l`t. :.c, �,�.i. .- ,t'« ,+t'+' )n� t ,. ..:-. �,. . ,h .. �,r.. �•r. F. «• .. ,. ..a %:.. a, ,... . .x. � ,..C' ...•4. .A'.k .V, '4t: � .. � _.... r z"S 'C. . t, 1, ! t.,, x ai .. v r . t�stl, T '«r`Y�lt" i` ow .a.. .. ... .st .'r ..$ 1. i ...,. ."t .L ,,.. .. . t a._.. _. A 1 .a'r u...... .1„t.4, . ', t .. A.;+ t .!..-.. r_.. 5 §., r. .,t( ...... 4.+, Y.. -,.-..,, .. r-. ..,n..�i ....>_.. r ... .... ..... .'v. .5w!•. ',. .�.S' W �.r r E:` � ".'�. S ,.:C .Y ..... H a... , .V.Ay .Z .�.q�r.'iu .1. t. ._rs.. �M. { .>+. p... .... . t�. .., -.Y l..J ! -. Y. ♦..,.' � . �.r. A, r+ „„�� .:.,LJ C4. 4 '4 Y- t S+l... u :... . .,..•.. .Y..f.....+.._.. ,,.. _, �.lh. .. uy ! d ..,, ::.af �. ..._..4. Z .-� .�. .x... 4 3 i..♦ 1 a t 'T' i. Y N V ! S .., Sl.. a t. .r_ ..,_$ w ,..r it, c.xt. . .t � . t'i .. s- a..i. .. a r., f pt...,... s'�. ..+t. +.. .4 '.� K� .e.. „.r .t- -t � S r .,,. ,k,s» .a...:. .. . ..:. �,,.:..-....r... a�.::'tw ,'v�..4x,:±,.. ..:..a.ty...,."�. a.4..,.., ..;:.,�� ,. <, r.,„'�,. a.. ., .,,stk.'�.,''+ ,l.iJ.?....r,41'w. -.....i..,,..,, .,t. .w'r.�.. ,'�,..., _ 1!...a..,;1.,.....r . wM,..:.:r,;.t�.t.t. ,4 ..,,. ,,.t. t • � .• h I-.tsr t ay' rF @ 1 . • a`w , j;t-; +i `' CITY OF TIGARD 1 ,,,awry NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS .,-,--,' ;a Notice 3.s hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the C3 ty a n Council at Fowler Junior High Lecture Room, 10865 S.W. Walnut Tigard, `;t Oregon, on June 27, 1977, commencing at 8:00 P.m. with respect to the .L� following: . .:.,,:,v- '''''' ZONING , '' ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - Request by the °City of Tigard to amend ki . ,, Section 18.92x020, 18.58.020, 17 °12.030(0) (appeal to City Council) rl,g ; '''''J to extend the appeal period from 10 and 15 days to `30 days for City Council review of subdivisions, minor land partitions and design review. r ;. ZONE CHANGE - Request by Larry Jackson for zone map amendment to " . A` y change the: zoning designation on for Washington County Zoning "RU-4�a i,, to City of Tigard Zoning "R-7, Single Family Residential between -y S w.. Former Street and S eW Errol Street (Wash. Co. Tax Map ,4 6d;. 2S1 3AD, Tax Lot 'SOS) , 1�, i', ZONE CHANGE Request by Donald Pollock for a zone map amk'1dmen t to �` `: _\r change the zoning designation from Washing ton County Zoning "RS-1" to �:' City of Tigard Zoning "R-7" Single Family Residential `south o`f S. ., n Durham Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 14A, Tax Lot 700) . t, ZONE CHANGE Request by Charles E. Cos tan for a zone map amendment "i2 ,,,- 1 to change the zoning designation from Washington County a'RS-1" to cf..';',-,, Single Cit y of Tigard Zoning "F� 7" F����y Residential, south of ,f1i �' S.W.. : Durham Road, (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 14A, Tax Lot 800.) . FJ 2 , • \ZONE CHANGE -- Request by Martin Eggert for a zone map amendment to l',I; r change the zoning designation from Washington County Zoning "RU-4„ to City of Tigard Zoning "R-7, Single Family Residential" at ?,tr. 9795 S W. Frewing Street (Wash® Co. Tax Map 2S1 2CA, TAx Lot 100) 1,- r ZONE CHANGE -- Request by Robert tpkie for a general Plan and program =a' )(Ay� .. review of ;a - proposed five �(5) duplex planned development in an tfi "R-7" Single Family Residential zone on S.W. 98th Ave. (Wash. Co. 4 Tax leap 1S1 35CD, Tax Li t 1600) . >'' APPEAL - ZONE CHANGE - Request by Kermit Carlyle to apply Ci t y of ; ;,i l ~ Tigard "R-7, Single Family <Residential" zoning to a recently tly ';w '} annexed parcel zoned Washington County "RUm4" •on the north side �.' of Durham Road, yes t of S v e 9 3 th avenue (rash. Co. Tax �� " } 2S1 11CD.r Tax Lots 800 and 900) . w$q, 2, h APPEAL - CONDITIONAL USE -- Request by Eas toga to Theatres for a t j.! conditional use Permit to remodel and expand a drive-in theatre . at 11626 S.W. Pacific Highway t'twash® Co Tax Map 1S1 36DC, Tax t'` ', Lot 5OO) ° r`." y, ' Ldp 4, By Order of City Council { u Doris; Hartig , C). City Recorder. F[r. r TT puh1.ish '6-2.5...77 � 6-22-77 ,..4.,r ,.s tali - A AAR: xt':: • ' ,,•ti, !"3'77 trs rA ' .c.!.;7 - ,r T(r.•,r*YS ism a w r"'"'a,y"F .` I.r,A y;;gn tw.Z... r S''', y t , N ;..<" r-v,..k 5 x�i •r .,> x y ++. 1 , ,z lb`"k`�"P",GSS'i '..A;C?: .. .. t Y.. .., ,.. ::.. . .... .,.,_ � , , ..� , c> , ...',..;;....,::',,'',,i7-4; ..an >i .x5!e;mo ...sot t .. �.�. .. ... ,s',,,,,,,;-';..A.:.-,,i..:1.7 . .�, ,.. .. ,! ..�.r. . 4.. . .. �. > ,,. .> ... �"�?"�al.'va-•'p3Wk}' t.. i s:- :fr+.. „ ;t'e k,.. ..> ,. ?'S .>.. . a..nr ', n ' 1- . .. .. •', .� u z.,r,.i .... .... tcs� .,: 7� 'FV . ,''�::._- >� .,-. r � . .., ,.� .,.,+ Lk a -..i ... ... ._., . . .-r1� n. kw 4r _ t, s ... k. . 1... �, . . .. `G k. t w. s}. ..Y L:4 -. .r.. B t ,. t « -s sr.. . .,5 s-„ t 1,,'",:. .�.,x,,, ..x� v:> .), .] ..w v .�., �s. t ,• w+,, t� f.n?�s.! �t.. , r e.. S +L �3� .h '<<_..r _... 17. .....,.,. .Y,x.�,r. a+rA.0 't` �� �,,, i?e. �'.w....ti. -r=`�.s k,x'..x:x MalL.r�:2��y hrtis �t 7,r i++.;,{�eh 1}ws�rt}u'Lx K,xxu.. j>1t, L�� } y t,� f. 6 }L�S�.y=i y Y _ .�. r, t. ^� c .�r.nh>�•n:�,,,x�,.. '.,.ux 5r...>� �n'`i�� Sut r't.'1_�.�� �'tit tr ti�, t2 �; 'i. 4' MINUTES . t TIGARD PLANNING COMk SSION may 24, , 1977 7.: 30 P.M. ,. �... Page 6 l,�r 1 0 That under the flood plain ordinance .fencing would x rya. not be permitted. ffi • 1 + • w {v ?. 0 Discussion on Tepedino recommendation -'t .,.; o Wood stated that a 5, 000. square feet minimum, lot size ,3 :'-s was a reasonable request; ,�..- 0 Staff suggested that Condition #1 be amended to read, ''' "by an engineer with demonstrable expertise in By- z 1 ;drology „ �7 9k, z� 0 Daniels stated that the cul-de-sac would exceed 400 .0 �s ;: feet but would be listed as code deviation- ' ` tire,-} '` Goldbach moved and Sakata seconded based on staff find , k - ! ,,';, ings with the staff recommendation to read: ° t; t 1. "by an engineer with expertise i fi n hydrology. , 4 .412 6. The dwelling units adjacent the northern boundary be ,i p{. detached dwellings 7. No fill or construction allowed in the flood plain n;i ., ; A.Jw 8. Minimum lot size of 5, 000 square feet . , The motion was approved by unanimous vote, with Tepedino : t abstaining t ACS ..,_. .. s% 5 .6 '.r OA 14-77 w A request by the City of Tigard to amend Section 18. 92. 020, ;; cur ` 18. 58 . 020 17 . 12 .030(0) (appeal to City Council.)' to extend ;-' the appeal period from ten to 15 days to 30 days for City > . '� Kra, ' Council review of subdivisions minor land partitions, and `� design review. {:. ' • A. Staff Report .'' o, Read by Daniels �., . ' r ' B. Public Testimony: .., r „, None j, yri afrr i$. ' a t � fry` t'''''' r (§t y+ °it,. , 1. y tv n, •t S A�, _ ` +....,t.{..•..-n .+rxxn A+,^ eN y yyµn I i t_,� '�z-` t. .y J ,6..L. mow.. •a+?�.esr� sn�a sr:.ewe � � .... .. .,� ,� �.�w!�e.�. .. '�?;�� .G^ �� �,- a� T, s,, z�'i« r �1 i'. . .:., _ .. . "41+-. .,IS 'FtrG. , .o,-�... ...., .. .., �`�'-",�.e'�.. ... .. rfst. Y.•p:L'X• .._, ,b't, �. r.K t. �u i ... : . .+. ,rte.. s.. _ .,,.. r.. .. _ i.1 t, • ,� �� .., . ,. .,.. r . ,.. 1� , ... , ..,:c'b.. �.7- p.f� � !.�..-, . . � .u,... .?�r.:„ f�. .. , ,: .. ,. . .. r. t... ,.s t.1 .. .tt .. .,i. ,.T'�t. .�.,,., +, �. �d .'� :r. f+. R. 7Y t ' . ! N .. t .... A.. .., m �. F ... ,r. 1 . r.Y..r.a . . ...}n"SF..,..:. •'i .....r c', a.- .w7D.. 1.-..i x_. ,+rte i� .,r .. k „. .; . ... � ., d. ...t., �.x ..,.., y .,, e,. 4?. R ..W:t.,� x A,f a,A. r... . 5-7 ,.; ..,,. _r. 5 x n. 3 ."� u.., �. . .. .,..o:_v r .,� ,. 1 . ... .. q.... ... 1.....v,.., ,,.. 7 , +i �.... ,:. 1.....iw. ..R<a, d.. r J.. F ?.ii 1 .. .... ..... .....� n .#� a.o-... . . tt . ,:.«- .... .. t 5 . .. ,.. � ., ,.ten :Y.. .. : l _�`, .:'L,: i.�i ..ss�� Y-. ... 1.! .... .. l r , .�e. s >w.... .. : ,.{ ��.v.. Iv .. S' ,....n L n... ,�.,. ... ., .. ?iy,. ..fief.. 4 't H. .�L t: .-t{�v. rbd. . ... i. .., .s.Pi d.....yti.r«... .¢, + . , n„.a+... .. . 5,! ,... �a � .1 emr . � . s � r,. <.a...n2cc.�_,.-�..?.�. .,, .q ..,.,. i?F.; .t.� 5 ._ ....., d. � �. .A„ z ..., •.lA:;s- ndr. r 1. J a I.1t 4.�,A A n. tS”. tNb .S' :G :F-. t _.. T�,n .: .}Y. f. L. �:,, :E « ,,�,a rid: n.. � +C'4..r E',g 7Ai� r� ., :y: n , .; s'r�•3 at, to MINUTES � t}t � Mgr:. T I GARD PLANNING COMA, .3 810N Ma.y 24, 1977 - '7,:`30 P.M Page 7 C. Staff Recommendatalons a}i. bbl , • Staff recommends that a standard appeal period of 30 4=, days for all Planning Commission, Design Review Board, tmi and planning director administrative'' decisions be in- , corporated {� into Sections 18,.58, 18.92, and 17. 12 of the 14 ',. Tigard Municipal Code. • . , D. Commission Discussion : o Commission discussion on notification and appeal o Wood questioned the time period. o Wood and Goldbach stated that the 30 day period �k would be in conflict with the intent of shortening 2 the process time 1xx 't4 o Staff changed recommendation to 20 days. Goldbach moved and Sakata seconded for approval based on j staff finding and with the staff recommendation of a 20-day appeal period. .5 kt: The motion was approved by unanimous vote . , to� ,e fi r; x5 Ir. 5 .7 Park Sites and Development Standards ,., A recommendation by the Park Board to adopt the proposed park and open space system, standards, and selected future park sites. 3 5 • 0 Ben Altman, staff representative, presented she proposal R 0 Wood questioned the City's hesitancy to condemn property yti tix for park use and inquired if the City Council had taken a position of non-condemnation procedures for the acqui- sition of land for park use . ' `-k o Altman stated that the intent is to acquire park sites '°' with the least amount of adverse reaction . - o Popp stated that park: standards and site selection would =3 ;' be discussed in a public hearing at the next Planning Corn- mission meeting any 6. OTHER BUSINESS : None '` {, ` 7. ADJOURNMENT: 10:15. • T ,�+ r t r. t in!`•xis•;r°r +„sa,^.s•--.a• _ ^'Kw" av-::.+^f i...a3 1 z. .,. k. L Y:o 'a?:k ..tom'i, c'L ^'+4'- r t ...:. •. .3 1. a4,. ,..t 3':':. .. ,. ..i. ..':, ..Y'r. A2.. +,. L..x. t.l.. .1. h... •.<...-.-.S ..... 4. � k- a r4. j'„ ( ..�.r ...(+•\- (.. .. .,. ..+. ;w ... .1 rt. +' .+ 4 ,y i.a.. .. T,. -..a n, ..,. . ..,,+....Y.,r .:.. fi :..,V :t. { ..5 d,. '.fit': !•i .> .Y.....1 7. ........ r.. a }*..,.a\ a., ..r .tl . .{..fjS. .. :. L...,..0...!.. rv.. fi, • :�, t .. •, ... � i.: � .'a F J%. d..,. _ ,y., ,.,. 7 ,t.... '.:u`,u., t} t., ...s ,.....^.. <.., 7 r.s.'4 ..r_.., .,h. rf y,.;.'1•^ ,.L,.... ,.. . ,.t_ T t s;.- ' k.. _..... .... Y.. + r:.. ,.w s. .. .. .>, t....v ..,�.',. e' ,.x.., ....,,.3 .{,...,a?iv., t...., -.. r. :a. .r, T ti... 5{. i�xk..3_, .v.a A -•.t.s yT s" ...,.. .=r a,. .,$..; .u....;..'@, 9h,.:.,�'�... .... _ ...W,u.,,.n +.. {a�..,.l.{... .., - a ..... , .. ..;,.!^ .... .,..... ....._.. .,"„rf,.:Y`-TY. .. .. ,....s. ..._.,-..... .. ...... .< ..•,. r. ...a"' •,. e .;•,•;1,,,....,,,,,,,,........H,....:•••••••••:••••••••••••:•••••:•,,.......,•••••••••••••••:•••••••••••••••••:.••••••••••••••••:••••••••:•;•••••••:•••,•::.:••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••,:::•••••• •••••••••••,....:•••••••••••••••••.:::••••,......:••:,..........,............:•••••••..........:•••••:•:•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••...".......,..:••••••,..............:••,...........................:•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••...........................................................:„..„...............:••••••••••••••,..........:•••••••••••••••••••••,.........:•.....,•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••,.......:•••••••••••••••:....,...:,...............,::••••........................................,: :............................::,......................,••••••••••••:••:•••••••••••••••••••••••••:••••....„.:H•:••••••.........................••••••••-•••,•„..•:.............:::...':.•••••••1:•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••1..!•.1,1; 5' ,t - Yq!•� rtry•, , ,Yi } F RP ,alt STAFEORT ` AGENDA 5 .6 4 TIGARD PLANNING 'COMMISSI.ON �'•} May 17, 1977•••• - 730 P.4. �. Fowler Jurnior High. School' _ Lecture ••Room '•ti. 10865' S .W. Walnut Street Tigard, Oregon•.� }Sf is �i 4 ' DOCKET: ZOA•• 14-77 f,. : J Y.l.• REQUEST: To amend Section 18.92 .020,. Section 18 .58 .020, and Section aS: Y .17. 12. 0'30 (D) of the Tigard: Municipal Code to extend the• 1 appeals. period from ten. and; 15 days to 30 days• for City• P; •••Counci , Planning Commission, and: Design• Review Board re �: view of admtrative cdecasions regarding subdivisions, •minor land partitions, and design review•Nn fsx• 4k; APPLICANT: City of Tigard P" P • • - It�;• �k: I . BASIC FACTS : t. . ,�y ma . 1. 18.92. 020 (A) of the Tigard`lvu.nicipal Code reads as .follows : 4 \• .. •,X: "An action or• ruling• of the Planning .Commission authorized t• • by this title••• may be appealled to the City Council within 15 #F LNG days after the commission has rendered its decision by fil• � ing •written notice with the city••recorder.• Notice of appeal• a; •••shall state the •name or. names of the :•petitioner, date., and t`K; • action••• of the commission being challenged and reasons for t<, •such an appeal ,. The fee may..be established` by the Cityx.•• I Council to defray the cost. of preparin-ga verbatim trans }'•,`'• cript of the commission hearing • I f no •appeal is taken kg within the 15 day period, the decision of the• commission f. shall be •final . If an •appeal is •filed, -the council shall re- 1A ceive a report and recommendation from the Planning• Commis `'• ,.;; hr• •.51011 of a verbatim transcript of•• the hearing before the com- 1 mission and shall hold a hearing on the •record..established: { of before' the Planning .Commission . .Notice of the .public. hear • " ing shall be by• one• publication in the newspaper of general •• } circulation• in the nt less •than five ..days and •not more• h o• �# than • ten da s p riorto the da y of the hearin g� " 4•kid ' fft• 2. Sction 18 .58. 20 C) .states e 0 ( ••"Any action o,f the planning director or •••his agentmaybe•appealled tothe Design Review Boardby the applicant or ad k4•� ,jacent property• owner. provided the said written notice of ap- ;.•% peal is received by the• planning •director within 15 days of••••the applicant ' s receipt of nt��tice of action by. th.e plannings g director or his agent. "• i;R. Tp]i r i Y rt •• .-,... . .:_,., , �,... xo4R"e++ ..,w.....,n.,w-.w' .. �&,1 _ ,Gw1r w3 . Y-ut i*... t.�\.. x;;*t '� .r.�h 'i. ,,. .\ f. a+.�u,sa?v .. ,.Kst.+=.. ,*__ a,u, „ .""•fir....,... .. ,-...�e'�'., ...., h.� .. Y' .l ,� _a .... .- .. r.r-,;ca°^u-. ..;z+n9. ,c..., ... ... ...., .., .. "�p\c?,� -:, ...-,+r3". .,.. ., '...:.... .:�,r r ,G.. +. .. , .w Y.. , ..,. , r- .•Y. Mf w. . �: �,Y'4.w. . 3.7.• .1. .5.. ..♦ }n I i 1 - �i _{A. _ 4a, .L - 4' L A . \ .,.. _ ...., x}. ,�,.. -, f. .t �... .r.. � .. r..,...f.. ..,..,. _ ,.{ 4- � t9t,,.... of �::,�i: c iu :. f r5 }. .. 3 }'..x.: 4 : L• �e., . ..,�. 7 4 'G -.. ..,.. ........ -..> a s. .f tf...:v. ... . .r,.. . -�.:f:: ti' -L .,"x., _ >4 t .: .t .��lr .. ,,....� n : ,. ,;:-,.a� ..,_ z • r r s ,: ,.. c..,.._5 -•�, ce" „t.. �, r a "a,, h i. t F t a. �;: ...� ..w ,J.i. .,- .. r ha 1.,=;. . �,., ,, ,rn; .v.,,� ,. .. ..,...,....� r � ai �'�. ,.n 4 ,� � >L'S. w. ..r.::?.. ,,.. .\.,�",..;,�:.,.v,h•tii-ar..5.•y-.r. ,�A..7... ,.t-ws,:..r.,:. ,.....,,.w,_...,.; .SA..._.:::�,,,,.!rf.Y ue. .._..�..��..,., . s.a,t .. ..... .S...�. ,.,s, ...0 �a.".. ..n-...., ,\4� i. . f, ,..., .1..,.. _ .:r{. u,.r..,C+,. ,z�:, .`n ...,.,v-;'' .F. 4 v« fix F] 4 ,F ak STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5.6 TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION rat�T ? May 17, 1977 - 7: 30 P.M. _ !„ Page 2 r,If 3 S ectii`on j,„„7.12. 030 (D) states i r: .r , qtr "Any person aggrieved by a decision of Planning Commission in tlFS . , . approving or disapproving any subdivision, major or minor partition proposal may appeal such a decision to the City a kkz,« ,.'Council within 15 days after the date of such action of the Planning Commission from which the appeal was to be zSJ taken 4. City of Tigard Resolution 77.43, which establishes City �y s r . r Cc un � Planning. -Commission,,,,-.and-.De, i �- .Review.. I3oard...xe- k • view subdivision, major and minor land partition, and design review approvals, 'handled administratively by plan- r ning director, requires that the planning director notify each .of the respective boards within 14 days of final ac- t, ��' { tion II STAFF OBSERVATIONS r � With a 14 day notice to the Planning Commission, City Council, Design Review Board of final administrative actions by the i2 - planning director, it was a concern of the council that with 1`k only one :day to spare after that notification the respective bodies might not be provided an opportunity for review. Po itve aspects of the proposal are to provide a two-week de- cision A cision period after receiving notice by the planning director =a: of a final action in which to consider whether the respective ! board or commission would wish to review the proposal Negative aspects of the proposal are that it would increase the period of time in which a project could be delayed or stalled-- 11 �F in some cases up to 60 days . III STAFF RECOMMENDATION: tV , Staff recommends that a standard appeal period of 30 days for all Planning Commission, Design Review Board, i and planning director administrative decisions be incorporated into Sections 18.58, 18.92, and 17. 12 of the Tigard Municipal Code ? Yj r l JZ r F .. .,._. ;,«•. _ -:. .. .....,.,- ..; _ .:... ...:� .,..._..- .. •.,.,.na,. .. .. ........ .•.. - r.«Kt ,:.a.. ? .i..,w `). .r. Ke 7.t ur,i . .ri,•. . r.., ry , ..szt--zlW a. i.... tet�J y°'. 'p�n^s& .:elk. 1.. 3 l ! �1". 1\- a 4 l „ r i k, €• w, s ....!:�"�. W,.,B,..L ,..,.,... ..l. ,. .....�,;.. -a:�:L .• .F" ..,.r, x'r' ,.",.ui.... .✓t, ..x r.>t. ':y„ a. J. .. st, .. ¢..,.. ,. r.i. .t at-.M ., ..,. c. ..Y h. ..-_.. xn , r... ,f.}.. -.•, ..r. ch., -..,... .� .,: # ,,., r, - t i. ,1 _ u,., ., .., .. .s,.n ._ t ,. c: :.•,.. }t .T ',...S .. Y., Y"1.., n ... r.. ,:. .:M. .. ,. ,.:..Q .-:a ♦..� EL W-. 1 %T.+ l ... t+ C....,J' .-.,. �,d. t ,.. ...! .x �Jr. F:. ., t.� «o-, t _......, .+.. ,.., l .. ,a. ...,?.•r r.:,.x. r.....':` w.•,.r c� aw.t.-x ,,.�Y.. t . ar . ,.«., ....x,<. ,, :.�F ... ....; ...M � ... s t. J ....v. ...h, .. f,.,.. ,,.,,..'1.....•,....,. a,'L....... t�,.L1.r_,.... x�.� .;.,�e,. :t .r..r l ,.....P 3,..�«... ,...� �,.,.... R' .,4,....,,n,...w.• t<v,x... ..v-, , 'sa:,. ,..i•,.,iv .. w.,.. ..,.at;t i ..s.. ,.. .„ • :.a. ., „rte.. .,. ±,,.,, .,.. _ . „ ... r,. P,... ?•F. , r_,-,..K.rF I 4lrr AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATI4 view of sum,'s,t , `,, ' • bons,and 1�trs�'r r}, " NOTICE,OF PUBLIC HEARING son/Glaubke)NPO VII All pers," { ry`° ,TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION A request by J,A Patterson/John hearing in".-5),' - s STATE OF OREGON, May 17, 1977--7:30 P.M. , Glaubke for 1reliminary Plan and Pro- and submi 1 H r COUNTY OF WA5FIING1'ON, ss• •Fowler Junior High School--Lecture gram Review of a pa f,*,nse 114 unit or submit `�1r'" t.;,$, Room single family planned development in of the mee x 1, °.,.,;, '10865 S.W. Walnut Street — Tigard, a"R-7,Single FamilyResidentlal zone ('11'3184—''.,,..,?",,t,';`,,, Oregon at 11985 S.W.113th Avenue(Wash..Co. *. ,. I, ... J,a.seph..•:S.chaf er 5.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Tax Map,2S1 3AB Tax Lots 300 and �1 i being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher ,..-.._-'-.-----....--.... 5.1 COMPREI3ENSIVE PLAN.'REVI- 301) " r"�' � SION'2-77 NPO,V 5.4 ZONE CHANGE 15-77'(CARLY- \rrt'' , • A request by the City of Tigard and LE)NPO VI ° ;?' --of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defned Neighborhood Planning Organization 5 A request by Kermit Carlyle to apply 1 fi'.>. to amend the Tigard Community Plan, City of Tigard'4R.7 Single Family Rest-' F,,fi? ' ' by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, 1lublished at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and , 1971 for the area bounded by Interstate dential"zoning to a'recently annexed �, , ,,., 5 on the east,State Highway 217 on the g y parcel zoned Washington County"RU-• :7::,-;,;').„, ',. , north,S,W.Hall Boulevard on the west, 4 on the north side of S.W.Durham' w r �, state; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed was , �� ` and the City of Durham on the south, Road,west of S.W•98th Avenue(Waash. Mk t ,• 'ilished in the entire issue of said newspaper for ...__.- ..,.• successive ana The revision requested would amend 'Co.Tax Map 2S1 'ICI),Tax Lots 800 ''• • both map and text of said community and 900) ,+: +i, � plan with respect to the above•de- 5,5 CONDITIONAL USE 12.77' ;,�,_,� consecutive weeks in:the following issues _....,.,... :, .•• ... .-••»• May 4 a 1J. e977 scribed area, (HA1V[METT)NPC)II! "i� 5,2.ZOIV.E HAn1,aE 11L27 (POL A request by Tigard Health Club for fry: ,- - ;"_//,,, LACK)NPO III a conditional use permit to locate a '21,-,?. , a t•, A request by Donald Pollock for health spa in the Tigard Plaza(Wash, , -S' nature) p ) �.,• a.15 unit single family planned develop 5.6 ZONING ORDINANCE AMEND- ":v „ 17th ment in a "R-10; Single Family Resi MENT 14-77 ' 41,'',,,-.1,,,'„,'',1,'11`', •f " Subscribed and sworn to before me this,..•,.,:,•.._.,_... day of..._ dential zone between S W.Pathfinder A request by the City of Tigard to ',. 1 Way and S.W. Walnut Street (Wash. amend Section 18.92.020, 18.58.020 3`r{" .., .. 77 Co.Tax Map 2S1 2BC,Tax Lot 1900) 17,12,030(0)(appeal to City,Counell)to ; ,,, 19 extend the appeal:Period from ten to i ,° •.. 5.3 ZONE CHANGE 14.77 (Patter- 15 days to 30:days,for City Council re- 'r�','Notary Publ' of Oregon r;?q it `tt , +?,,, My commission expires ..... ....19.... t v `r Pct. p Yet-;ii ',5 i n !is t/ta 4F 4 ii C f ■ 7; •4Y#v�F yi s 1 a t 1 "A. 2t u&.,!- ,. ,x$. 4,,,i,k4;:l r^ ' t cj,tiK#}t+yf ,,% : ' e ; :4' \r t irr j ] r t'k+'s:'