ZOA2-76 POOR QUALITY RECORD
PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and
put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the
microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions
please contact City of Tigard Records Department.
tr ,
r,'�tL~7�krgjt r�r;, � +b��,;i�lr°a�if±.l•'
y G`k i�t4 x t t4j1 �,
uJtr4t r 4 Ft fryS(; , ,'yrx+�A h r is
r{j "r xyc' tr1�4 IA CI aS'�tTrr
41 `'fit ,�A 11F 7;Vr,�'�i"i t f 1 A.t•
i"f !;1'f�tl+�t^11 ..,, „. .,: t•'t;y�t,ype di4.1��
......ti ,i-..a,. �. ,..,,... .„". :,av:,,,. -t. A r. ,,.;n ..:..,- .. t. ., fir... ,.. ,a,. ',�.r; +.'a a ,:(. xr.,1•
•
ti•-�.War•t.e•,s
..a«.,.,.�„�„^w.r•:,,Mtn t.,s.tfi•M.n.,t.u,na.,.,,,a C,mnAr•+�+•.+r,m.x,>.�:"ieR,..tt7,nw, N. ,,t, ,` "fn,m...?.,a...,.,,,.„,•.,N „r:,..,..,,4..", •.,.,..,,....^t� #,... ,:.i.�;il�t'";
1,.;;t r{
�1`ii i VS Tx;1 N e+i lRi �, I I'rn1,v(�i51?1l,r.tf�,711,3`�� r�rlfl�i.I llo
ua.';+!
g" �"a�fst:tM1yrt
gg6 AMEND. TO CHAP. .
�8 20 T0. INCLUDE _NEB..
tt'r�io Gt{:.,,.,I,r:'�,3,-,t..,.,.,r+•,K,,,M+••('a « ,,, ZONE-FOR 3 DWELLING UNITS PER .:ACRE
i, . R10
4"''41f t+� �j1 d i Sj 1 I,•Aa rel�"�t vctY ql } "s'.rly t rr :t�*V t 1r
1..-rt '. +Ea ,wil,.'+i,r4.,rt, �,rx Cdr 4t 5.r St,1!�!",r.�,t•;V' xl.,�?vrT A:� of e,', ,� d„
Zone Ordinance Amendment (ZOA 2-46)
VS rya'• : -
t,
4r+fir+�
kS ti
�trtJ
IgL,
p<SPII r
rrtt�1yg
r{zr1
•
I S r46r
Prs7,
1� 5
y.1
y;axf.
r�Fra: �p
�Otl d'
pp+l.
,4thy RAY'
yip
stme
Iw t1�`
xi`g,
, 04,
,n ,
0
alliJ j
ijEJ1d RAtl11!
IIq ,
t+�j'ak t
tFr 1
I
Fi"i)rt
+g�gl�ri
t t
x♦..-I4. �,,:,-,,,, >xn .hV. ,i., ,r. y,e....v.,f......, •,a..?-,.« { Crt.,u ,.. ,. A,::-.. -., :, ,, , r .. .,, .�,
,� .,. r ,n �,,/: !" �4. w.t ,b.' a �ti, _t a .aua 1, x,•"11! 4 rl, -t, r a'.,,
3,s*y
r:
t
�p.
kart!
G,,+r+j rr. +
iè:' CI rY OF ZAD O, R ,
{rj
ORDINANCE No. 76 - _ r
r qa,t�7., . ;f
R
t+a
:::fi(,;. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. O-. 2 ENTITLED ?tCITY OF TIGARD 'i
!::.'",;',' ZONING ORDINANCE OF 1970 t , AS AMENDED, AND AS CODIFIED Ii\ TITLE 18•OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, BY ADDING A. NEW CODIFIED SECTION,
�, ,, DESIGNATED 18.20.035,_ ESTABLISHING A NEW. ZONE CLASSIFICATION 1 -10, f
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, PRESCRIBING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING
ir? '/
�`` ,• AN EMERGENCY
< r
,►';' ;
1-%,,,:..,,;',. ,"' THE'CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS
3 ` ,,
r�1'': Sec ion�1,; The City'Council finds that pursuant to Chapter 227 „,ORS
ralN1;i and. Ordinance No. 70-32 - "C�ty of Tigard Zoning Ordinance
rr.Y.",
„�!e „ - • .:, ' c e, ,�
��,. after and'e hereinafter stated amendments�tto�o •. .,.
sa-' zonin , , da.n.
`+,,'. legal notice, were subma;t p' b1i.o,.. hear n 1� the
l „ City Planning Commission on ApP 1.>r�6., 1,976, aria • the Council there-after recommended: that said toning ordinaric+e be amended as herein ',
�r t forth._ •
t,r ,, after SE:
r',',';0. Se : The Council further rinds that, after due and legal. notice
',A --7777---
*. a public bearing was held by the City Council on v a,
4;;• F an opportunity •to.,
�.��� � `were•afford:ed,
�1W!,� ,s,�97 � u�la.creat all a,nter es ed: ersons: a i...► , oonda,t .ons precedent fulf lled., �e heard" w�. ula ;respect thereto, and
l?,f, with respect to the following amendments to the City's zoning ordin
<<��,x ance o
i
N ' Section 5: The Council further finds that the purpose for 'those
ff amendments is to rotect the -.p public health, safety and �
,,,'
general welfare and, furthermore,
•
said amendments servo to implenent
;
-Ay,;:', the Ctt g r s objectives and p olicies concernin g residers tal development ,
� ; as stated in the ' Cammuriit Flan and Ne .ghorood Plan Number ;7
ti,!..,,,,.,.. Three O
...k` Section 4: That Chapter 1,8.20, Single Family` Resi.dentza:� Zones,
1 J 1%�� w. �..: +- � r-1
(R 7, R 1b, R-30) 'fie amended to read as follows.
i ; Chap ter �i8.20
w,
,,,Sri •
(`�'{c Sin s :Camil Res dent1.al. Zones. l,1':'.'
e .�-7 ` 0 R�15, R30
' ,''
i�; ,.,. ectns s
Aif,
,, 18.20.010 Por�nitted Uses ,,.
r
rr ;
01'5":;-, 18.20i0,20 Conditional Used
1,,a
lS.'20.030 •Lot , -: R-7 zone
P,Iii!'/' 18.20‘035 Lot "- R1O zane ' , .,,,
,,r 18-20.040 Lot :- R-15 one
' ;� 184201050 Lot , " R- 0 zone
�ti „
0r
c .
wf,��+i•,
.. ».ariu ,ikiiiti ,;',""•',",',.,;,',:i F:q•u:!+� tY,,k C»�"Ctt,,eexaeea m^,:ii";r,';,,.t'°"'r'�n'rr!`":a;'arr •;a+t.;,t�r"M"tK;v!a;+F ,f' tE� '.!r, .A.., ' r r ,, ,i r r
.,,x, . .,S ( '. N $�'?i', $M Nd1{�'� """l1WMMd,46:, It,^d,e,,, S,,,M,W,{ •n rw, , k u
t r u 1 I.n� t '�54'i,,_�� 7.„d�: i���" gi't�# d,,R ,$."i, :+-;i•'t,,,+ yi:
xr,;t�r
q fl
18,20.060 Setback --- R-7, R--10 R-15 zones
�r. 18.20.070 Setback R-30 zone
18.20.080 Building height g
h h d
18.20.090 Additional requirements
The following sections shall be amended to :include the R-10 zone:
f�tr:, Section 18.20.010 Permitted Uses. In an R-7, R-.10 R_-15,
R- 0 zone.
;,"� 18 20 020 Conditional Uses. In an R-7, R--10 R-15
�r ti
,�x�,l: Section s r Conditional �9 9 ,
ir!
g 4' R-30 zone
fir,y�x t
r$�fps
A new section shall be created to 'reflect the lot area and maximum,
coverage. ,
Ow
18.20.035 Lot -- R-10: zone. In an R-10 zone the lot size shall
be as follows
m4
(1) The minimum lot area shall be =ten thousand sq. ft.
„1 (2) The maximum lot coverage shall be thirty-five percent
Section 18.20.060 Setback. Shall be amended to read:
#"t�,jr h‘.7, R- j or R-15 zones. may otherwise be provided
�0 �xCP`��t as
�lt�i •on 18.20.x.00 the se±backs in an R-7, R-10 or R-15
a.n. recta. �. (allows. . .
01: zone shall be as 080 . „ uaalda.ng Heim• shall be amended to read:
Section 18.2.0.
kr�f
;xce t as provided in Section 18.12.110, no building in an
t„ R-79 RRRR 10, R-15 or R-30 zone shall exceed.
Ire
,f,rltwi
Architectural Design Review, Section 18.59.010,
r�r}�
Chapter 18.59 .Arch
shall be amended to read
Y x n
18.59.010 Jurisdiction and ower8 st ^d
( ) Except for single family residential dwellab;gs (R- 7,
R._,,110 0 R-15 1A.-30) no building permit shall be issued for. . .
,,
o .. : Inasmuch .., peace,, h F • j . °y'
se�,��u 5. `"_ u,ch...as _�:t 1s necessary ,for the peace,+ eat t�. and safety ,
of the City of Tigard that the zoning matters
as here n.above set forth be established with tb.e least possible delay
thereby urr �.y ,yf maintain the legis ative , integri-ty of t .e Ci t s
�� + i �0 ��+1,r•4'.4 a J,l�ri.+� i i.. Y .
i' , zoning ord :nan.ces, a �s j hereby w. exle-t e .d thaws
• � �. emergency a: r�by c�.et,lxareu�. to
ordnance shall. be effective upon its enactment by the Council and
approval by the mayor.
k}Mx
_ . �' Cou c l Members rss .11 * belt.
g
P.�1.���'i�e �..... t1'I'z �1-t,Y d.1'..� 'V'G7'te b� r'�.�.�.,
read three w `mes by .umber and title only, -Lb s � day
1976.
x
City ` . and
Reoorder � Ca~t of 1'
APPROVED: y the mayor +this
r
C, A
.7!
'µ �dk - - yd✓^'J'*a ,✓L�'Lwx' C.4.{ r Klr �"x«
Ci �K ?/
sy of r C� 1`
oiq 7 6) .
Y a
x;a�s!rrGMa,�t tttiqtP IF`a�,!"xwx11rn,e�fYfis r�rx�gXxr^'"�'�iarar^^nn!rri 'h±Poeha��w+�+w,kr+«�, ,..��.
', .' . r^ Yr'�6'.u7'#` ^il gr. 1 :1!A'f;3y.*' 7' .''r,1
,.
`4,'"
t"
:/",0„
0„ �, paeww i Yti
,`` 7« PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST - GERBER LEGENDARY BLADE
(a) Cit y Administrator reported Gerber Leg endary Blades had re- ,,,1
;;:0tt{ quested a pubic hearing to appeal th e action a of the Tigard
Site °'
volapa�en� and Arch,�t+eotr��°a�,. Design Review Board on. May hi:
1,f,
11 1976. He fustier explained communication received from Mr.
Gerber stated all the necessary information on parking :needs and ';,l
y��tit
`M!
landscaping in _ a p at the May 11 th meeting.
�" P g p�,an,s had. not been resen" ed
�VIk
(b) Discussion followed with Council and staff V
ls
c) Motion to refer request back to Tigard Site Development and
Archite c t u�a1 Design Review Board for reconsideration;
4,3 Councilman Moore, seconded by Councilman Wakem
d Approved by unan mous vote of Council.
Htsr
8 MONTHLY REPOR9IS p
„i, Administration Finan ce Planning
Building Library Police :1;
EAU , (a) Motion to receive and file, Councilman Cooks seconded by K�r
AN Councilman Moore.
yt
(k x, Approved by unanimous vote of Council #
7Y ,,
r I
90 ,BURGLARY PREVENTION MONTH - June 1976
,rr A (a) Chief Adams recommended proclamation by Mayor o
t0 (b) Motion to approve; Councilman Cook) seconded by Councilman
Mo re n
Approved by unanimous vote of Council.
10, APPROVED SEWER AGREEMENT Dale Trump. - 12525 S.W. 68th h Ave
(a) City Administrator recommended Council approval.
(b) motion, to approve; Cour i man Cook o seconded b y
Councilman
Moore a
Approved b unanimous vote of Council b
4u 1i ORD/N,
A�TCE Mo� 76�-23 AN ORDINANCE AM�I�D.
' MG ORDINANCE No. 70k�+ 2 FNS
,
TIT " r Y OF TIGARD ZONING ORDXNANCE OF
1970 ) A A AND TITLE
S A]!TENbED�. AND AS COD/PIED IN ., . .
uyr. 18 OF T CODE) Ht ADDING A
� �0 THE�EDGA�D�M��'�CD�� �G�iA��,b � gib..
�, W D ON) S? 1 356
;!r{ ESTABLISHING A NE'W,.,.ZONE CLASSIFICATION
4
�';�,1 " . . .. � DEN�+��AI 0 PRESCRIBING ,N
5
� axMG� �`:AMx�Y' S
EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
r,Yrc
'/,'44, . i�.n. recommended Gounc .l approv6.16
a� 7�a�ng Director reco
(b) Motion to adopt; coi nci nan M ckel,sono seconded by Counciltr1an
Wdltoto
Approved by uheilitnou8 vote of doun:oii
�tF
PAGE 2 - COUNCIL MINUTES . MAY 24) 197
tai �
.�"�l,;?y+�`(iaaofL"�n4',k�y�,.,fi•tt�#1+'�'�k'+#'"d+a�rfiMt'!e1,�)"W,1scroXq;l,.,a�wn "'h � t .,,, ,. ,, ±h
::. NF '� � u .,f.:, `. "r,.''l, � '`"§R';r��'n"�1f+�»�w±�."+w*.�`q�A7 i^h9P(ifN4?Y �''?j �� StW4I?WY twf6ws +^ 1 �.ry I Q y '
.. 1 a,. G1 aCa � r 4�.i,1i:4 1'r,�el F :"�
�tat M k
L,fv
ti�n* W
I t H
}M�3y 1,4 1i
',' ' (1) Put?l, Q Ttrst1,Mony
rrppcangn ,s Mro Alex Paul, Applicant
� sz
Mr. Charles Robiuowi tz, Attorney `.
1420 SW Hall, Portland
j QppQ e ts Mi a Vaxde n bu gh, Vande�bur g h Q s Shoe Store
John & Eva Moak, Tigard Travel Agency
Jerry & Gloria polling, Tigard Travel Agency
"Aa; Dorothy Vinson Mode.Ot1Day
Barbara McKiver, Discount Fabrics
Mrs. Girod, SW 92nd Avenue
Anna Brazil, 11475 $W Hall Blvd. +,
James Aitken, 11895 SW Greenburg Road
Gertrude Pastor 11505 SW Hall Blvd,
Qrren Peterson, 11635 SW Hall Blvd.
C. MeliUs, 11635 SW Hall Blvd.
Mary Peterson, 11635 SW Hall Blvd,
Harriet Peterson, 11635 SW Hell Blvda
Truman Peterson, 11635 SW Hall Blvd.
Anna Peterson, 11635 SW Hall Blvd.
J 6�F
Reuben Spxecher, 11635 SW Hall Blvd.
)s �
Claude Allen, 1163,E SW Hall Blvd a
, 4
Nancy Steele, SW Hall B1Vdb
+,r Helen Keyes
,
Mrs. z. Smith
Don Brewer b SW WainUt Street
� .�
Richard Wright, 11115 SW Park
rH
w<', (4) 'l,ann1,ng P .r�ectoz reCotmended Council denial of app pal btt t
S4 f d :1ere was a teal need for that type of facili try 4,n the
t . He further pointed out there was concern for pibl c
PafetY ap'd teqUested Chief Adams report to Council on h ,4 find ,ngs o
x r.
041,0f 40s §ptpmarl.zed his memo to the Planning Director r9coPITeP4rig
foU'g specific conditions be identified it permit if Go4noi1 we ep ;r
oppVQ 'e the c6ndit1onal use permit
aYt I
P1404ss�.on �'e1,1oWed by Council and applicantn
hpt
7MQt pn to deny appea10 Countilmaa Wakecrii seconded by Connoilman
fi' 4�0eb
0o4nOitim4n 810ketson suetaitned from Voting as he was not prespz>ht t9
hi t" E3 tit�lony e
Mpflo , passdd by' 1tiann ,thous Vote 6 CoUn,oil, vctittge
1.,!,;if,!" a (0) ZQ0Z$0 ORD tANC AMENDMENT
M ci 1
A prppo'sed attendtreitit of the Tigard pa Code, atnending Chi for l$i
IL
ZOolt g, Sa rttpn 1800 S1ti gle remi ;y Residential zones r eQ 1.0o1040 a nPlIT
00#(1 c f , trio , for 3 .dhl.elling u xlta Pet ante o)
to
Y eatt.ng ()paned
() $tejement of Pacts by Plai Mile biteotrot.
PA 3 # (300.Q t' 'iIINOTP$' P.4 MAY 100 196
ti
attr i.�
yi gin,°i _
Y C F lrthm Mwe.p xpMpnri,P'r:my.a.! ,y M tY{" a S,4..
,., T� � .'��'J,t S 4 ,V( ,.w,.,YxMl {•"Pre `^ r.r^y«rrAu+cvwy�»•wrm^;«r v.
- a• .',,t Y Y "'•:j;:s.. ,>Wyr^w!'J' C'M'fi YYM7 d i7f4 ;l p'r'"! ,3,::F w HPI i,Ya �^Y :,, 5 rq. , ,.i +y ,.Y Y. ti,
Y A G •, p. . ..;h ty;d 9.r F�,_�y.n' ''` 'T,.,1�,--�J `�. �.
'mtX.
`�I�yy1
Sriar I "sy �
ris);r Pqh.140 1 ep tL.mony a
T1.1;pbord 0, Wrighto 110 15
SW Park, 'f,igard
r�ra Mai'. Wright; qi os tioned why 'MPG #3 plan was reques ti'xg R 7 Un bq
changed to zoning l.n. thei;r planned area.
{
1 ty *,dmi{n s trator pointed out NPQ #3) the T i.annt ng PoMmtss1,04 440
city Cou4ei.1 had been, through the hearing procebs, at wh G tl e the
rlf{,Y p i. attend and testify. Admixt3,:�t1 ator conca,1,ded
hel ,PQW#5 .14ntsetsoouttthe rationalization and jt,fsti,ficat,ion
ate'„ the t rpe pf Zoning classi.ficaticn and was available
rovipwl
(4) 141.a,n ,g pi,rectpr' recommended Council approval.
4e�h tr ,%
(5) Dl;popsai,gn t'oiliowased by Council, and staff:
•
} 'y
diix`epting staff to prepare an ordinance amendii g girtY aonl.n$
Gofie a4cp):41A,g
1y Councilman Gook seconded by Counp&l,t}i q Mogre.
P SO d
by 41naT),1Mou s vote Of Coune l
Rz41
(d) 49 NG PAPTNANg.
4 _ro d AtttO dment of the Tigard � 1 , leg ,
�, Po s� NCun �ipal Code, anrendi, G1aa�teak �+ �
xs4M: ZPAi,ng,, Sd�! t.Qx?t 11 X2.100 Yard Requirement Setbacks w atrtendix g a4di tional±
a
cen
te �ing setback to 3S feet fox a1,1 of 5W Walnut Street.
1 Y,
rh (1) Pub411 c p0aV1Og Opened
18 �Y
,r.
( ) $tr tet ent of Facts by Plann,in,g Director o
rl�
Poh11c Tes 1monyi
DRS ;t.Atg0i7, 11400'
SW Wal4ut `.
$yen $uart?,S trout; 11'40$ SW Walnut
c4) Panning OiteCtOt t ecotrittiended Council approval.
iii}'
(5) pi$A0aoton followed by Councl,1 and staff.
f't"r (6) Noti,o0 dl;'teotitg staff to ptepato, an ordinance amending Section
of t ,+s 'I,!l,gard MU4t0i,pal Cody:; G bricll,tnan Cooki seooncod
r yy G �y /� jr{
gq,41h41,1+ti an WF.l em
[s� 4
A... . ov+" 1 by otieo ,trc t o votoi of Cotnc i t
„ a
( ) SOP 'LFj itO ' ilr ))V00)sT 1015,76
0t^ po$ :.d df vuppl,emetnta1 budget to provi,cle'
o a sta te P 6 nl g
at t . : pd 01t rva do Dve o trtnt gouirlss iot (1 ,o#D 0 r)
to
the y o `` g4 d f0`. the f i.soal yeah:" 17576
�. :x.. ,,. ., i',
(1) p4101 i o 1.164 ip,g bpencd
M 1,
It. t t Y c� ntY
tl,�ti P 4 toi 1016
t _`.eYWAU.rwwaewurwfuu Uh w '!''I6R.Fi5• '�• a a'S� '� '�"' i C,�tl' 1 "1j'''� S_ �. ?,'' }`' •. S 1
R�^�8^YS'+ .r'?#" 'T F9"+,:?"A�",1,F' 47rua�t".. �tsr�a' { r,x.• s ! •t N yy''>,;{?' ,'i "� ,i ip,
aI4` -�-G•:- '
I, }
I;
krrr ;e
i X,rt al
,It2,• 1
lll
c,,,,/,,,k++ 7
It q'
x
Y'
,war4t c , / (f7+ / I it
...,.......L.,_,..............
'h'''' AFFIDAVIT or PUBLICATI ow
$.�W, e.+r rw f A nN, Y :rR;r r �Y
� •r, rt w,.,.� �«N�1^ �fd�j � S w ,
,',��' , ._I. NOTICE OF, If . yA
T, SPA.OE. OF OREGON, Notice;�YsAher.tb , giv,en the a,public,," r,„,
�''
"f,` CO TY OF WAsiITNG'TON, ss• hearing'��if)l,e"hald by the City Council
'L1N at Fow Or- r,, . tgh cl�oo Lecture,,- �,;;:
wisr, ` Rodm 10'65 s V"e iiinut'Street,'TI,'',`' ,1�
:1';:;;1Y: PTO S'"e 11 S eilaf e, ':.>a..,.- ,.wa... . ..-a:-.� Y ,....,..r"gar(l, Oregon, on;May 1b,-;076,1 begxli�.
,., T, �a Y..,.a,-., ,...-Y,,.Y.,-Y,. ....,,... ...... - a,ning ti 'S:0( Po?1 \vith apect,to 4the x:" ,
folio ..x "
i that I ;am the publisher :_.-«—h....,,.,a. F �` t,-a dt3 1. s " r `, rt'.
p� being first duly sti�rorri, depose and say tlx �►`�Il�lO ORDINANCE,,,,,'-AMENI:��° ;;�
'4.,''':';');'' ENT•± ,''',',,:r,.....',;', "� . ,.'. '
{ + f .:.. r ...� er� � ��l:.�l`IA..7 '"',. dv'�;��9k�°,. �µRn h,P" � � �� ",., �'
of etieral 'circulation, as defin , ," and„,
�;. .,,,....h#.....Y.Y-"Y-of The ' ibard, �'inies, a newsl ap g
enote'11 �
�r1?fi ;∎ Muzamclpal,Code,amending Chapter 18,`; !i
t,,rz, by OR
'r,,tt S 1.93,010 and 193`,620, published at Tigard; in the aforesaid county and zoning, section, 15.20 Single.., at►"illy.,, )
r Residential xotieS, to include a'neW„ I t;
r�,s-
;,e',,; i. zone'clas,sificatiori for 3 dwelling unkts` "
state,.that the.legal notice, a printed copy of Vt+liich as� hereto anrlxed, was ;r.L of•acre R-i0 0,: ,, , ,., ,>� �� ' t"; .1, " �`
,',1'„.',);: ccossive and �. A proposed arr,enadinent of t.he,,T.gar,`d.„: l'
,,ht
published' in the entire issue of said newspaper for w..�...`....'_'..-�,-=-� su Mti►iripal;Code;ainetnding'„!Chapte►'184,: '`
Kw�,� Y 7onli� Section 18.12,10Q 'Yard Re- �,��
� i
Consecutive weeks in the fb1101Ving;issues �.,... .,...�..-.-,-..Y Yy- ��-,- N,-.: w,-�.�.ww gwrel eat'SOtb ks`, any i'clirrg;eddl y.
't,,; d � . 97 .ti ow 1 t enterhne�5ctback to 35 feet fa 7
1.,, April 29 X111 y y all pi S.'�'J�V��alnllt Street.
, .a..�...Y�"r,�.Y.,..-wY Y.- '-++ ....#. ..Y.«5,--a.»++ {.�' '�T/y,,,�/'►(; LA NOS'(�JHr,�rry}{Z 1��` p]/�'� y..
('Y)"" ,4:::....Y...w.-+.'..Y. -''*.,w,,..t:s'a''''-a.,w--w wwrr.«..—i-- , . yr+" �. REZONING.V7.'i..'LANDS YY l:.l'IIINI.Nl:V'+' r y,5
.:,,t,.,.‘` . ...Y. ' No. 3 I3t UNDARtJ.VYi,4 , , ; ,
, '- r..
,:e,,,,!,', .:.;...�.,»..-...w , :�Cr4- ....�.. .�. �f�ia"�,,aljpiroval, of,rex�onmg 4�,
e urst
,
(Signs ter � . ,',4,.� <, � 1 `
d"t'a"> R 5 within the,batindarles,of ;NP(�� t
J � laricl
�;tr,''' ''.. 7th .Y , mountain Area!' tO ao fo ni.with tide'°.,
No, Plan
(i! Sulb.cx.ibed' and sworn to before lno this .:,h......r ��.. .Y..".�.y:a_..: day of "..,Y. a
;� "(. adopted
� C,omprehensiye Plan, as 1'
111,% Cin lerided1 , s'''-`''',.',.., '.ti," ,, x i
';',,,',,':t: M1Y '7� CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT , ” ,
A:
:‘;',::,1: ♦1 (�1y,1+I[(�(V �yyy+yyy�{`■�� (� ",/y1
'y rrl1,11'� /i.hMYY..Y,w..Y�hM �+w INMhiMYY I^' Rec3 Y+.}.w�.t by♦un city, Inc c to ope�'a�. 7
"+4,,� M family` rest"eatiop'tenter in C-3 zone, ,r
1
� ((' I t �y4 y �y' , (Genera r a)In the vicinity of
"',5 y YYh.NWyhY.4..i#-,.>•,r'.Y+t^rw Ya 1..ir�4':ua.iuR.',. {«t hiMi h.Y/e, , hih.,,.A.. C.J -irne/c, l' ` 4J
YY♦f O.Y-r g Pacific Hwy W Center
rv1 Natary Public of Ore qri S'V�'� " and bC," y
1s4,i'i i / Street (Tigard` Plaza) (Washington f,
n yr l
,41(b , , ` ' { " Carroty tax map 1St'35 D Tarn}n `;''',
. 1 ly
p1 ,
,.,.,,,,,...,,,4„.....,„,., ,,,,.h..,,,,,,,,....',,44,Y • 19.,�.� S�bl f5A , lean n den�ed by q,Pla bt
t ,1 t My oorntnisSion OXpites'
Con"il�nis5ipne ,
ll inter�.s. d ersons a a
&Rig%�� ;.... :. _�i,._Y.r,�..�.- .�- -_ .�, .• ... t4 't'$1 � r4' �i
,1„, - � i3 y ppea
and be heard,in favor of or against the ,,
7 � sa I ' N.'.'
iE Y, BY ORDI:R O''I'�IE'CI Y COUNCIr
■
'("ictr`
yIi,
,i ",. •. . w DORiS 1ARTIG ,1
i i� I" !� MCl Y IIECOIILEit
i''d,:.
('1.*�,'2' 713 '�, Putllish April 26, May 6, ,",
. R
Is _____j5/6).,..,,,
, r�
x
U
x
r ti „
1,
i
r
4,,',A,e f
♦lii:
yyy�i„ ''
i1 %.'.',,', .,
a
.,,; ':';, •., a r-. ,, .. •,, ... ,: -.
,, •.:..k, ,,, ,�. a.r. rY'SN,+q,'-"F'+w.^m,�?1?,.aa.at.i.l.,y e,eM9+, rtw a��. -,�++'le!hL._pwln, cs».ra ,Ptapyqua�r x� -��e�h rk:+ kAr~ar "tiN M^:.:'',, t•, t.i:�a.. :rb „)t ,..," 4 J,8., w,9 ,Y"..;,'
,�4�;,.�i."tr'�>y .d f....>�'(k(t1?�'4.:.,.�1,"�T�',.�F♦wd4',!'(�+-¢f4:wr�YRI._.:_. r a+ ,•`�.:;�,.�.�'�r:s�,w�',�,..4 N� ,,,x;s �',. M�.,: „'C�'���, , dtrt» �,,'.�-t ... � .r;��x:+ wr�l �e t"1 ra�`!�M :.t..�� _., 1, ,li��1. ,�'Y
y w;
r r.
rrr 5
rpl
fq•
y fir. r,l
,.y
Ir;t' •
f��tt: ♦ 4
'', T I G A R D C I T Y C O U N C I L
REGULAR MEETING W!NUTE5 APRIL —2'6—,' T'9:';'6—,-7;;',c) P.M.
tr'`i
, , 1. ROLL CALL: Presents Mayor Wilbur Bishop; Councilmen John E. Cook, Alan W.
"al
Mick elson, Robert C Moore, Lynn R. Wal em o
B. Adams, Chief f of
Police; J. D Bailey, Le gal Counsel; Richard Bolen, Planning
Director; Bruce P. Clark, City Administrator; Doris Hartig, City
Recorder; Arline O'Leary, Administrative Assistance.
2. CALL, TO AUDIENCE FOR THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
r ty,
7f f4;
(a) No one desired to speak,
{
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 12 and 1.3
an 197
(a) Motion to approve: Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Moore.
` Approved by Unanimous vote of Council.
'f w
}047; 46 WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
['{' 1161) Packwood. re: Federal Revenue Sharing
Les AucOit reg Federal Revenue. Sharing
Al Ullman re: Federal Revenue Sharing
Coos Bay re: L,C.D6Cw
Public Utility Commissioner re: Hur}ziker Street RJR Crossing
kta'
Casper Bruno re: Taxicab rates
H.U.D. re: H.,C D, Application
(a) Motion to receive and files Councilman Cook seconded by Councilman Moore.
Approved by Unanimous vote of Council„
5. SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS:
(a) Motion to set the following three public hearings on May 10, 1976
err°- oom evoing at 8:00 P M. at Fowler Junior High Lecture Room
Uri i
, a
Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA 2-76) A proposed amendment of t:he
h Tigard Zoning Cade f a mending Chapter 1$ 70
to include a new zoning
;It; classification
for 3 dwelling units pet acre (R410)
Zonin; O 'dinance Amendment (ZOA 4.,76) A proposed posed amendment of the Tigard
g p p Z d l00 yard g
y d requirements
�Iunioial Cody, amending Chaptet 18 Section . feet ,, , .
+,r'Y setbacks �l� to make the additional centerline setbacl of 40 feet requited
f for All S.W. alnut street within the City the same as that required
►�1, S fi i
by Washington County (35 feet)a
,f,.. Y q .. g
zone change (ZC ��75) Request for ap���o�r � h ,a ..:t ,.�.
� al o� rezoning o� lands within
�, . th,, boundaries of NPO No Plan for Derry Dell. boot of Bull Moon ai
Area" to conform with the adopted Cotnprehensi to Platt as amendeds
Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Mooteb
f,r Apptoved by unanimous vote of CoUncilu
.f„
n,,,w �.. � "�.fd"��"iumoe'.."�11:2/6ratrJ'Arnif4 w.._ ^ i Y'•�i Y pi•'.f {i, +
lid
MiNUTES
Tigard Planning Commission
April 6, 1976 - 7:30 p.m.
Twality Junior High School -- Lecture Room
f� 14650 SW 97th Avenue, Tigard; Oregon
a
l CALL TO ORDER: Meeting called to order at 7:48 p.m. by Com-
missioner Popp in the absence of Chairman Porter.
2. ROLL CALL: Present: Moore, 1�icola.", Sakata, Popp, Wal�em;
staff: B3olen, Law,'
Excused Absence: Goldbach Porter
..3 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes o were re' approved as submitted.
Staff 4. COMMUNICATIONS: St
NICATIONS: aff informed the Commissioners of the resig-
I*, nation of Ray Ems,_ effective 4/1/76.
`'("'dry' s
! d A1R.I1VG5
Ij11s(
al,fi • 5,1 PRELIMINARY REVIEW 77C 2-76 (K j elgaard)
t Orland X ' .e aa:.. d for reliminar Plan and pro-
,
Aram review of a proposed residential planned development ,
in the vicinity of 13778-138 Z�0 SW Ha11 Blvd. (Wash. Co.
tax map, 251 2PD tax lot March(tabled from 1976, meeting)
�rMarch 2
A. Staff Report
Bolen reiterated matter being
�ted the. reason for this.,� o t ' meeting in order that NPO'4 w i
tabled from the '5/2/76 mee�L�,�
should have time questions
p east Bonita it M.
��n t ,,, area ear- of Hall blvd. and north o3 n" a
zme to resolve street location
.
4z1,,1- Bolen read Into the record a motion which the NPO #5
had adopted at their 3/24/76 meeting with regard to
, 1.
4` i1 ;the Koelgaard multi-family request.
r
x
rit� t
B. Applicant Presentation:
,
rr4
krk
o WJn Stuckey, engineer for the proposed Planned
*!.; .Eevrelopment, stated that he had nothing near to add
4 •
1, to those statements which had pre\riously been given '
in his presentation at the 3/2/76 meeting.
C, Public Testimony.
sp1';a r,
t ,
o John navery, Chairman of NPO #50 reiterated some of
N ' the findings made in the staff report and stated that
rhon this property and additional surrounding property
i
r r
� t
.:,,, -. a ....- a , ..,a eei,,..y r:,xnMrca•.m w ....:a,a « ,! . n,:.a , .' eav:aw.ar:.iv3d+.r, r, ..:«
. r,•' an•q �,}•..Mn.prafa«S?t".tM r>'!K9NP!!tg' ^...h,ti'n41 ,,.Y '+. «.,,:J;.»'+�mar*>err,"7;r"r',,a,.`Im."^'Zf!,#a'"3nu hit., !x:r!w+sAx!zngta?i ,lrFiYd!a!Rrx,'h^f°41irs®r f,'•'v + :�F", 6 r +,f"�, i:r ,r!+�.,r,» t«°:ra an,,,+
Zt,,, it
,4r„
f
wa
ttFS
1 ,.: -r page 2 },
ry
„r,' PC Minutes u.
','I'',...',:4 4/6/76
,tm
`��; were developed, other developers should be aware
-` ' that they would have to provide for the cost to
construct an additional spine road s system. ,
d;t,, i p.
y �1
:;:4 o Wal to r Durham, NPO , asked NLr. Stuckey the approx -- i.'
.
, : mate ground floor area being proposed.
c'4 k o Stuckey responded approximately 1/6 or 180,000 sq. ft. • ;
r',1�x
,, t D. Staff Recommendation:
:ct=;
staff re commended that the Planning accept 4r',
„ r
F,t,., the application and hold a ,hearin g to consider the zone
d, ,
''#,,;;
change request.
;a
f k'°'r'i' •E e Rebuttal; 6'
l'dy'r o Stuckey stated that it was difficult to perform an f.-
�itx��.
x;i�' adequate job on a small segment and asked that the
Y',4°. grade and alignmment of the, spine road be pinned
;,,�,': down before the applicant is requ .red to do so. ,
t1�.,,,i
� .i,, F Commission Discussion and ,Action
,
Nara,' ,
na kedsta
. i
,,, � ti �staff's o�p in on as to the number of
,4 t°' ' its being propose . t
,, ,,, ,
aced that he did not want to be critical at , 7;
�3o�.en. stated
this Mime, but was concerned as to the amount off:
`+',;iii open s .ace and its arrangement as shown on the con- r i
�Y rat � p �
kl,„ cept plan, ,'
,
w
y P',511,-', ' o � i aa motion to proceed with preliminary ?i`
{ , „s
m plan review, ?,,,!e,,,,,,,5,,,,., `v
't;,;�. o Seconded (`Wakem� ;'
x, N
';'. O` Unanimously approved. f,,
'', ,' 5.2 ZOI CHANGE ZC 8-� .5 (NPO #3)� ` �'
r Request for approval o; rezoning of lands within the
y
Hj '{n � 4• �, pY
iti� boundaries of NPO #3 ,Plan for Derry Doll-Foot' of null i$
' Mountain 1 ' ..,,,
,(,,�.;. �n A�.es, to con�orin with the adopted Comprehensive rehens�.ve
1,"'fit:". , +�.7
r * , Plan f as amended b
il,w
1,4h; A. Staff' Report: ,
i ,,,,t' n Do1en: stated the reasoning Jor the zone change
a , request -W with that the zoning he brought, ii Ito �,,
",,i'; con±ormanoeiwith Ache recently-e riop•ted Comprehensive ., +
F, Plan (NP0 #3) ,
y'4iXI 1,r.
"r `(i
1f`
r"i't�
"yl aj _'>1''w! ^l', ,ra „r uf,,,�'.r�4:',.,',,,;•,,, .,+n� i Yh�f.r. ,r,,k.„ ', ,� , ,.„„ ,, r M ;,. ,:`i, 1/2i . t v xy ` u ,. ,
,�.k
'''''''''',„',. ,,
1.44 ti Z'
,
r.
k
,,,. page 3M,. (
'
PC i
j I M
nute s
Y,r;„. 4/6/76
lei:
V B. Public Testimony:
.) none ,
C. Staff Recommendation APPROVAL.
r,
,4 i:, t
;' ' D. Commission Discussion and Action:
r,r, o Wakem asked staff if counsel for Mr. Pollock, Lou
. , '
''a+ Fasano had contacted staff regarding this matter.P,v , '.
1'
c!�Y
nf,;, ; 0 Bolen stated that he had talked to Mr. Fasano con-
9u, cerning the possibilities of developing the Pollock
tt441i
property andthat Mr. Pollock would have the option
'i',":,',1'. of developing hi S property under a Planned Develop ,
k,t,lt�
ment density at 4 units to the acre.
:',;,14,:.', p
',;K{' decision Moore stated that due to the recent Supreme Court
{+4, ion regarding Baker v Milwaukie, that by law
qr''« we would be required to bring the zoning into con-
e� �
�' formance with the Plan.` ,/
a Motion for approval (Sakata)
{,Ni o p
I'+t;f o ,Seconded (Moore)
o Unanimously approved.i f=
5,3 ZONING 'ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ZOA -7
tiriT: A proposed p amendment of the Tigard Zonin.. Code, amending . ,
a'".1 Chptr 18.20 to include a new zoning classification for
g
rr, 7 3 dwelling units per acre (R-1O)
,fi
r
t
' fi A. Staff Report: read by Laws
tt+e w„
'" ' B. Public Testimony: none.
tiYw j
,,,`t,..,1.,it . r
;
e
, Staff Recommendation: APPROVAL, recommending the 4
following amendments to be made to Chapter 18, TMC: Y 1
r ,' Chapter 15.20 shall be amended to read t
„
'4"ir Single Family Residential Zones (fit-7 .-10) R-1
r'
r R-30)
,
, ' Under the heading of Sections, a new section shall N
•
',rti
be created.: 18.20.035 L .- , R-10 zone
It' I.
t1
q�ti: The following sections shall be amended to include i
the new R-10 zone: k
0
a
;1,1)
e
"1r
...G.:.. ■reb..le...«.+ p*��/'!7t'N.blrt .plgyMWC A r 1. nk+• 4d1 M,It.'�a M�A I.11,..,.rr. r"^;."4,»y n;N-tx!..44.,..,.'.w...... i.4•.'_„-4.440��m 1..0 r 4 9e X��a�tiu�.5,040.34 ,�-u, ,x14,”,..?+ww�Wl .wa+ .,;fly a.�>,1 v,� W a t i C^A •,{. ,V4Y 'M' ♦+�n,'�� SI: I' 4
_.. ;4(`
l If, t.
aka A,' i`
i
w i
���
,
,
�" r page 4 t , , j
',. L. PC Min to s ,
4/6/76
X}
' t
�, Section 18.20.010 Flrmitted Uses. In an R--7, _11.--.12, n '',',2.,.",,:
"f R-- . RHO zone. ;�
Section: 18020.020 Conditional Uses. ` In an R� E t'
} , R-15, R--30 zone. 7, R�-�0 E r
.,,. now section shall be created. 'to reflect the lot area n .Y
A n
, ' and.. maximum coverage, {, i r1
t
ti y.
18.20.035 Lot -,7.1R.-710 zone. In an R-10 zone the
If?. I lot size shall be as
i
�,�ii follows
t
;'!' (1) The minimum lot area shall be ten thousand sq. ft. ,,,
,fM , (2) The maximum lot coverage shall be -thirty-five
,•,, , percent,
section: 18.20,060 . Se, aback. Shall be amended to mead: "�
`, -R--'---7--, 10 Or A-15 zones. txcept as may otherwise ,
v 't be pride in Ser� tion 18.20.
,'4t'i an' R- �� b � l00 the. setbaCl�s in.
,(: 7, R 10 x R 15 zone . shall be as follows. .
Ri.i.''i'''. section 18.20.080 Building Height. shall be amended
I Y
11i'iy F c t o read s r ;.
„ " Except as provided in Section 18.12•,110, no build ng
rt,
ty
?,.?,,',L4., in an. R- 7, R-10, R-45 or P. -:3a Zone shall exceed. ...
f%r%;
Y
pr,.
ea;'"'; b. Commission: Discussion and Action
4a,z` '4
kIr}�' t
; r 0 Motion for approval (Wakem)
ak
,
';‘::...1,1:1,4'i,':., 0 Seconded (Moore) . ,, , , .. '.,,,,
.t,t
o'+, o t�anxmoxslY a pp rr ,
''' 3•J ZONING ORDINANCE ANCE AMNDMSNT ZOA 3-76 w• t
r 3
''b�g • q by + "�' Tigard g .'amending g
, f ' A +re ues� � the C�.t of ��.,and amen.�.�;n the �anr�,�cap�.n �;
. . ► ) ','
�;w:`: $Lan.de.x ds of the ',Zoning Ord�.nance (Title, l8 See`�a,r�n:--�°� 58 0�0
the r
�+ � : requiring' that secur�F-�� be posted with the City equal to
x.10% of :the coo ng as determined ;
Plannin pirector before y
o coot of -the proposed lan�,sca �
'� ��'�� g b �re tl7e 18 s��anc e of a.n�r
Fr ,,, I by the. City
�x',' building permits. ',,
T
A. Staff Report: Bolen stated that he had. con-tac-ted other ''
wwn 1, ` . - juriadiontione regarding this matter and
' ` itk' had oonolude that t.
d the preset:it. f7�e�Lho�. �s !.
. , both the moat effective and a.nvolves the
r � x ,j
}�+ 1eaa staff- time,
2 bl2."
Y�r�f.� ail
�
;''''.:,,•4:.:.';'.-n.;";',.'.;.';':.I,' ' '' n . ' n 'n,' ' '. , . ' .' . ,'.' ' ' - ' ' '' '.'„ . ' , ' ' .. 1',
1, t'
�w f� I'.at t „/,ii l }. .+, ,v ..n>lsr• a ,.. /.,. IY
7:a t �,, .��� 614,.„l!nJtq•(i�i�riwitk.�i,�3 �' t, �o pr' M ' " f, a ,r 2 } ° i
� yi N_'.1 r a�y 4T,M�h'ii iI:YI� f1����,w M� y4��Y�tf IW3��fi k�T� d
�• f a
r • ,
,
( 5
, page ,
tc�
PC Minutes
4/6/76
}tVL■] y.
B. Public Testimony None.
C Staff Recommendation. Staff recommended retaining the
present system as stated in section x
<<; 18.58.050 of the TMC.
D. Commission iss on Discussion and Action:
fv�Lil � asked �' i 1 1i1
0 Popp asked if 'thex e has `been any difficulty .n having r..
,,! applicants meek, their requirements. ,;,'
y
y t"
0 W-akem stated that he ft.-it that this matter could be
resolved between the two departments - • planning and
g
wt`,
11?
building. ,
Y. T,,. ra
o Wake motioned for denial. ,,
0 Seconded (Moore)
t�uy,
�tla� o Unanimously approved.
5.5 CONDITIONAL US1 PIR.MIT CU 5 . 76
Are
quest by Zarl Kessinger for outside storage of wood.
a products on a parcel o f land
in an M-�
(Light industrial)
zone at 12560 SW Hall Blvd. (Was h. Co. tai map 2S1 ���
R�r tax lot 2401 . A
(tabled IroM February 17, 1976, meeting) r�F
`rrd'
x } lur
A. Staff Report: read by Laws
t ti
';{rw .App can Presentation: ,r
Mr. Ted Nelson, ...stockholder in Highline Forest , Y
t t products, stated the nature of his business, emphasiz-
ing that it wa$ not a retail but a wholesale lumber y��y
brokerage. Nelson further sated that you have to
ook hard.i� to see, the lun`ber store . on the premises '.
Gtr and that the building serves to hide most of it. ;Tali;
C. Public Testimony: None. ;'`"•,
t r _ .. . . Staff I�i1xM
D. Staff Recommendation: S recommended APPROVAL on
the condition that the applicant submit a site plan ft stag whioh e�feo L�Vei screens the storage area d
n ±
rt, C �'t ebutta •
• `r
stated that ho was a lessee of Mr« David Trumbo r �
and that this lease was o n a 9 0 day basis }' th at lum-
1 J
1.. kw.-6- tM 'LI' ..M'4 Sit 'M!v+5,N1!.Y'�l�M?,i'.n> k++ NhMRM+ .,N
rt ., r. Tea ,m 1rM1 y? rt,.A?YP�N dr i,:,w x y„ a
..........,. .. tm+}7� ;n ! 5�....ta PSII,.'�Y,.C� .. .Y'� ,��'. �.... a } ...... �,:c... .. h""h-. „ ,.N..,.. rw r.. ..y �; t Y::., `
. x„ ,>.:... "R*4�'".`. ....rV..s'Cti �$:s!" M:.. �, ,r.,. ,,. 1 .n,.Y ,,. .w .. ,.,v.�.'1�,,. h4N' ,, b ,,.�.! f::1 ,. ..., ,. Ai", ..,'"
a.,,*.,0. r .. .,. ..,,. ..tw4 � ,.y 4 ,. r e.! -e,Jt ,a..Y w w. •,i .,, l,,.n , r u •x yr,
.e:: ,,:�' I ..... 1,.�. �.-., Y ' ^,�M y v.t �i ,�. >t .r•{ �w x d .`�.. ^""_:Yi7:� 'F'".- y:fa.• � ,wt, ..'Rd °� .., .gal, 'v�•, A 'A.,. ,•t a 1,ry'•
r'.
a.
-
<<, page 6 `
?r. .. PC Minutes `
t,ra 4/6/76.
a
ber stored on the premises is not owned by DBA
Wtnt, Highline Forest Products, but that they are only
a sub-lease tenant and that Herb Morissette Builders
.rent space from.- Trumbo for storage of lumber as well.
0 Bolen stated that erhaps the person we should be :
is talking to is Mr. Trumbo ^ as he is the owner of the
�1f.y property and that Mr. Morissette pays money to Trumbo
Jy h
to store material on the site
; F. Commission Discussion and Action n ,
0 Wakem stated that, when drivin g by the site, if he
, had not known about it, he would not have been aware
of
e lumber storage.
o Nicoli ► .„ r -` p
' t o1� stated that since there are additional artier
IN:. involved in the ,..forage of materials on the site,
it does not say what they'll do in the future as to !,
increase or decrease in the amount of outside storage.
. r
Wakem asked ,ff to find out how man y parties ies were - .
involved in- the outside Storage and that, at this ;
time it would be difficult to take action as all
the information is not available
: o Wakem motioned to table until all parties could be
present -to give input, in that they would be subject ,
to bearing
the cost of some bype of screening dev ice. RY+
With all parties present, the Commission would then
be able to find out what the impacts would be.
�rYKt' k�!
kr, +
o Moore seconded.
r:. o Unanimously approved. x,
it
rf�
aSt!
'}? 5 6 pi,00O PLAIN FILL P8RMIT. 7
H l- 6 Bartel
rt
r`t A rec uest for a flood plain fill permit to fi :l lands i r'`
presently situated within the 100 year flood plain, located
660 ft.* south of 8W Bonita Ad. on 74th Ave. (Wash. Co.
rf,a tax snap 2S1 12A, tax lots 1100 and 1200) . R'y
w k 1y
,.
A. 8taf ' Report read by Bolen.
t
`�R 13, Applicant's Presentation:
). o Ray narte� , architect for the proposed application)
,t.
stated that there were two issues involved -- one, �,q
a concern for development of property along 74th 4,-
and two, that there would be no adverse effects on
*properties both up and downstream
1))(y 11
"::",....1.y.r, +n...
, .w..::'.:v+. s 1 44 .f 1
1r 4 ap er t ; "14
.+. •,.,..:h.., „+/.... i - J, a.x.li.-... ..A.. ..-+......._ .,. .....u.--.,....,.l .. ,.....,•.`4..h,rv...+•.....1•-kJnn,M•tiww•f...,, wry ..,,.n. Mir wMi.n -.,..,,,, .,... sn. a............ ....m.
.
, ' page
7
PC Minutes
•, . 4/6/76
Bartel stated that the
pxoposal was in keeping
. with the Comprehensive Flan and graphically
t
illustrated -Lhe anticipated tic ated effects the land fill
E
would have on the 'velocity flow to Bann() Creek. • !. ';
0 Nicoli asked Bartel how the fill would be obtained.
o . Bartel responded that he hoped he would not have to
Haul in fill, but to _provide it on.- site r
C. Public Testimony: Nona A
D. Staff Recommendation: APPROVAL, with following conditions: ',
1. That a detailed engineering plan be submitted
to the 'Corps of . ngineers for their review and `'
comment, which complies with the flood, plain `
fill concept approved by the Planning Com-
mission when the ;applicant wishes to proceed r
with the project. f`
The submitted detailed plan should provide
adequate bank stabili ation techniques and
• concern for maintenance of the floodway.
2. That a public access easement for pedestrian
and bike paths be provided on all la .d west of
Fa.nno Creek and for a distance extending 50 ft. .
w stream channel on the east ,
on -bhe
`t ,side
a o Nic o 1i stated that someone qualified, e.g.
hydraulic
E
engineer, review the a pplication and make recommend-
ations
,
- o 3oJ_en suggested taking ±bs matter to the Corps of
Engineers for their review:
8 Reb btal: None
4a
). F. Commission Disoussion and AO-tion: r
1 approve the flood plain fill permit 1
.. o ,S�kata moved to � . ... .
with staff reooimendations 1 and 2 and added a 3 a r;
S
, ,. � � .' , .. r� n.strance agreement be filed
oond,�.i��an t�a:a`b a non�re o.
with the ,City Recorder for an LXI , upon which time j
74th Would. be developed to full ditY standards:
o waken stated that the iowe 84 Lee application, which
was before the Cornet scion, w .8 tabled for essentially }
a..;. is
, .. Y, r r4 gY•'JA';.[.I u•kyyW wtuuauua,Ny.Uc ;q.�, + . ' , ` �,
.,.x a.w t e - m ifi+',' .1a,4✓1:, r . n « ,.•ReJ DY J.r..h
r
of
page 8 1
r
PC Miite s
4/6/76 ',
the same,.. reasons 'until a Corps of Engines ,
. s-budy, was made regarding •the •impacts b}�e fillinr
would have or, surrounding properta,es
4
' seconded the motion.
o ,Motion-,carried, 44-1; Sakata, N eo1i, Popp, Moore yes;
aem no,
6. '' 'SU hIVISION
6.1 $ 2 -76 (Sumrerfield Phase
A 'request for approval of a preliminary plat _for Phase IV, ,I
Suninerfieid P1a ied Development; located east, of 98•th
•
' between SW Sat-bier' and Durham Rd. (Wash. Co. tax,map
r it
1. r 2000 t• 2600; stax neap
25�, C; 'tax lo1�s 1600, �.j00 �
2S1 iD, tax lots 900 arid 1500) 19
• A Staff Aepor-b read by Bolen.. • �;.
B Applicant Presentation:
o ;Bill Mo"onagle , engineer for Tualatin L)eveloprnent
that me e tin '1: 5 t
Co. ; stated that m � ".-�.�h represe�libata`�ves
` ! ss ciation had produced
., from St��tim�riield Me�i s A o of the 4th ..arid th
• son'ie oormpromises as to the layout of 1�he �I 5
hoLe5. •
o MoMonagle stated the increases and decreases in yard-
a,. e bhat would oco .r oh the , . c asd1 _t'airwayS
. .3rd", Et
•
age hand 5th
as shown on the rel minar plat proposal.,a e
res.. onded to staffs repo.t paddressing 'himself to
• eta ' f nd ngs concerning ttC onv"entional 'subdivi5'ionti, ('
yad retwor access to rham a zd placement of houses
•
Oh the sub�,ect site,
a Wakem asked McMoagle AS' to �'ualatn Deveylo merit
Company i e in-bent in alter ig the th h0104
o Moor . . � �. .�, i± he had,.been involved with
• �e asked Mc1��ona
glc,'
the master plan from the beginning
o h.
Walzer� �.s�ed the d�i'i`e��e�.Ges:.�et�teer. at`La►� r;d �r«
detached units as they relate to the m asster plat
and concept'proposa
• Public on s
• ,:. M o Larry itraus.e v Gehtury Oak Circle; Suxnmer+
'ield;
stated that' the play., as proposed; does not adhere to
.
thS oot'ir ept de"toted. on tho',mas bet play a
'r xxr: Mx i, ;o- i. i,:.rE� t I .. �.• � r � ,�.,. �.
• .. ,.pyyr,.,1>.yae...ew i. ,.,. i+.a.:wa:..tM•....seenrnnr.. ,u7 aa..T..mw •r;x , ... .. ...r,:.
u. ,ya. y p v ,.,.a«r, ,.r. .••,.• ..•,,».•,..s, -.wry.ne„!»'.ra....wn stt ur roc\.,yea^ f`krorwn"aaW,7FM.xCrw, .ra,•.+..ax
i page
1 C minutes
4/6/76
questioned the access onto Durham because. of the
future widening plans for this street. Krause
stated that the road system is an abomination for
access onto Sattler as propoSedr , nd that there was
•not enough greens` space depicted on the preliminary
Plat as opposed to that being shown on the master
plan.
0 Mr. Jeff Harris resident of SLmmerfield, said that
he had confidence in TDC developing the
property.
0 Mr. Scalleron, Century oak Drive, Summerfield, asked
MoMonagle about the proposed road system, stating
that he opposed the road network as shown on the
preliminary plan.
0 Morry Hellsor questioned the proposed alteration of
the 4th -fairway.
o Erskine P. Wood, Suinmerf�eld resident, concurred
with Mr Krause 's statements and further stated. that
TbC is using the original layout to
sell their pro-
duot and p ackin g the p hase 4 proposal with less E
open space and smaller lots
D Staffeoommendation
o Staff recommended that,the applicant lcant either rework
the submitted plan, using adopted devel0pmep.t
plan as a ide Or apply for an amendment to the
p � ,. hp Y
adopted Planned Development Zone. ,,
11.ebuttal:
a m Monag e defended the preliminary plat concept
andreiterated the proposed street system and lot !
,t :� ...
con± !
glirat�;oY�s
o Roliexrt Waterman, Century Oak nr ; supported ..Mrs
t1'eff Barris s statement concerning his confidence
it TDC in doing a good job.
o Stewart Hill Centur Oak nr asked MoMona�g b+le if
a a,y of the lots facing rattler were lees than 50 ft
a MoMonagie{ answered that none of the townhouse lots
were 50 in ' size
, 1 0 Mr, Ripley summer teld resident, asked why the
townhouses along the east side of the 4th fairway
irVV.i 411Nw tiFxAl J Iv»IVI'n 1 bISM ,,+IY11 x.,i✓'.i, 1 1 VII z, 1>Y'v+,rla^J.wY U iaf....Vf 4 4 ,. bx.0.1+h.ktL xJ{111?,21V11 La,A pi,.N.'il.iW*.4N n.Sr,W f .4 ,. �,.
ww w..4Yk1 A.nvua.W,.4gMP1RtM .
, 4Y.I MrA•w{+w+Y•WArITN 5nM YJ. ......,....
w�r'"!uy'A�!T-r.Wawa}MUihti:q�nidcr¢Vw,yrtmrvnaleac►.k.atr ,....� ",n •,, ''
r,
r
' C p._..
pale l0
PC Minutes
11./6/76 p
could not be separated further apart so that a
better view of the course could be made available.
r
"; o Bob Santee, Surmerfie1d resident, asked if homes
on the east 'side of the 4th fairway will have a path- u
way to the course.
. b Mrs. Slanker stated that `was concerned about /
access to the golf course from the east side of k}
. ; the 4th fairway. f
.
1
Pe Commission Discussion and Action: a
0 Moore stated, that he was concerned with the traffic ,.
pattern and its access to Durham R'4. from the site
andnthatf the preli.mi,nary Plan eras Making major
, . changes r e original concept plan and that he .a
would like to see afa. amendment to the concept plan. Ve,,
6 ,
o Wakem echoed Moore 's comments regarding traffic
. patterns and was concerned
rned with the two etrances
onto Durham and the modification in this area, and ;
modification to the preliminary plan was needed r.
in this area. Overall, Wakern stated that the pre - z °
luminary plan Was a decided departure from the '';.
original plan and that he Would like to see an i•� .
�.�; to the original concept plan. ' �
amendment
1 o entrances proposed onto
. . o Sa,kata stated that the -l�vr
Durham.. and Sattler will help to alleviate pot _i f`
�. , , p � ��� a � exft al ,,
traffic robl ems; but would l k see some changes , '
In the other portion of the street to She .
p eet sys��em. S
further stated that she would like to see a break 1.a,
through ehousi gdpattern,spossibly being accomplished ry.,
syS e j r ii.
o Sakata also stated that a Walkway access from the
Should be provided and that �a :,recons ation ,
.„),:/ ' of thePool concept ho. t Ut
triangle a.dcr
angle :portionU between the 3rd 4th and 5th holes
e r� r ,
shown o be o c a e d �.n �.
should be reconsidered.
o Nicoll asked staff as to the nett step this matter 1,,
would take and i another public hearing would be
{ held en this application,
o ,Notre ;made a motion to deny the preliminary plat
" ' ar d variance with e recommendation, in, -Ghat the
ri
preliminary plan was not p g with j . a g.
s r4b'� in ;fee, in W��h. the original ,
,f master plan as aPProvect F
' ,n w ro.rx ,„,,.,1.a r,t+ 'M+tYMmYflVmrovdtYMpY;kamkrglC ,W.4vu1VWW+rwaYitl,rwrn,w.ieb
, Mryn�,nMfN+ni':YWIlk.4ArFaWxV Vr YC.wwgNFI1`•r'r,YrtM...tw• t .ter-.....a.n v.«. I�Y`A4 ul{,4 IS y H' k i N!nn r+xY yr 1 r r Y Y Y..,I for II i
j
.:. .,,a..:..: a r : r.... .. ..,.w*4µY4 b.a.,.W-.,...t_x,lx;,+C„ r, x.«a ....a:,....AL..t.-.91ir r-..,,.,.,✓.,4..a,...F.d::JC,
•
page 11
PC minutes
4/6/76
0 Seconded (Wakem) .
0 Approved unanimously.
R r
7. MISCELLJU OUS ,r
•
7.1 An in,terprietation of use to deterrtmine Whether a Shaklee
Home Products distributorship and 'salesroom is similar
to other outright permitted •Uses in,,, the C-3, general
commercial zone.
A. Staff stated that they saw no p ro'`Dlen
s with this use s.
• and that in staff's opinion s, was similar to .other
uses permitted in the C-3 zone.
13. Commission Discussion and Action. •
o Xico1i moved to approve.
o Moore seconded.
o ,Tnanimotsly approved.
7.2 810N CODt APP8AL SCA. 3-76 (Masonic Temple)
A request by the Tigard Lodge 207, A.F. and A.M. (Masonic
Temple) tO erect a temporary sign advertising a fund raising
breakfast on ;aster Sunday, April 18, 6
x.97 r, .
A. Staff Report
o Staff submitted into the _reco'r'd a letter frYon
'� the � Mr.
James Hargrave; Secretary for h.e M asonic Teeple
retuesting that temporary sign. be erected on the
... church premises from April 14th to April, 18th; to
be removed, on 4/18/76:
Laws informed the Commissioners that staff 4.id x)ot
have e the . „u..bhorit to .isse a permit ( `gn)
v a s� t� s�- because
y .
of the type of sign being proposed and `that a
variance would be required.
r '
o Motion for approval (Moore)
o Seconded (saata) i
o Unanihously approved. 1
CO TtXTIO AL U 81 RtVI8W CU 21-75
Conditional use revue ' of Gee is Pao ,fie Coe,.”p era' Ion 1
s $
r•
,...e.r.+..arv..'rwumru xi r+nrH..vinq.y'w.,n,st•,mtM^• .0 t.-.,...d, ,...,r.gr.,Yyi"••w•w+ ,+°'yd'..wrt•ha*FrRtrrp'arftYAtfiC+ tiuYrt.nkusamrtYl'k.. /k4NUry y:w.+vw+.,.wge, , ... ,., ,. a-
•
,.g_ a_ -, ...Sam .Y,,. .,l.. ,'„,ale.. .,.4:«:�!•. «,(,.rii,X. ....a,,._Mar m.a...»Y.i..� .. . �.,... ...,.... ..........
page 12
PC Minutes
4/6/76
bake-out oven, (Tabled from Planning Coinrnisson
meeting of 3/16/76) •
o Staff informed, the Comn issionerd that no deleterious
,effects from the bake,-out oven operation had been
brought ±0 staff f s a.ttenti on.
o Popp stated that he of no problems being oreated
r the operation of the oven.
o Po pp moved for approval.
o Seconded by Wakem.
o Unanimously approved:
,
rl
8. '*OT R :BUSI171S N10 e
ADJOURNI
9.
vM1\1T: 11: 5 p.m,
1
•
{
♦ 7
tJ
I1
w++w+M.,r .w•r.vrxnw5uw,:.nrr nrem+•4+.rur...�w..»r«vu..a .,.v..w.......r. ':....,.,.....u.«-.n,..wau».,...awrx+.«.n....+..M,.,.rya•urnprnc+tswaat�Ylmt�:rcaaY,�V av�vwr wrW'+,vw...x..ura«rwy„"F ,.. ,,, , ,... .
� .f
• .-...'..•JiaN1.,a-r •-,J;.M1,...-rt,wrN..w nda-v, ....i.Wrw 4.m.e.. .ruu.4 4xv,.5,rwb.:e.-.Mnl,-r,+r,».fDrrL.,,.+i..nMl.+-..mdry+.:.h av ...-('I.,..rM:iro Nl JNwv.M-F1r,• / '
,r ••••• • h..+n-..Wihl w.r Nn.m•n...irn ,mrtM.:+:YM1+.1nwnw4S..N U.0 r.i+M.r4.wwMra m., ymM.1 Ff I.. d r11..fS-.. .L AA •.• �
•
r .N 1 (1;0' ' p
STAFF REPORT
Tigard Planning CommiSsion
April 6, 1976
ZOA 2-76
Agenda Ctem
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
A
A proposed amendment of the Tigard Zoning Code, amending Chapter
• � l8
20, to include a new zoning classification for 3 dwelling f
• units per acre, (R-10)
APPLICANT
• City of Tigard
STAFF FINDINGS
14 The.' ado ted N'PO #3 Plan for or the Derry Dell -- Foot Of Bull
Moatrbain Area has departed from the 1971 Community Plan
by depicting an area approximately 230 acres in size, pre
• viously designated on the 19'71 Plan as "urban low density
,
residential." of 4 dwelling units per acre to a newly-created
density for suburban density residential at 3 units per'
p� development a lication iS made
acre, unless: a fanned de p ,pp ,
making 4 units to the acre a poSsib'ility
2.
The p. p ing is 'proposed for only those properties H.
hichrmeete the�followin two conditions:
• A, their current zoning conflicts with the adopted land use•
plan •
B. the existing' zoning
will allow a more intense use of
the land than p rovided fo the adop ted plan
. •T 3. y.ge in zon�r.g from R 7 ( •
s
The char. `' � Ingle fam�;ly residential)•1„`I.nits to the acre to the ro o,;ed R-l0 zone sin 'le family
w
p p g
i1
resident al•�` 3 nit to the a(,be is necessary y to 'bring the
•
zonin map into conformance With the .NP° Plan. T
g 3
hest
p,r. •p r.g j the , zone change consis` pri-�
,a • mrr�w�.�tofsthein�. of eef�mci b� o of the neighborhood, ';
.r a y eiFngl family portion o the
The lot sizes in this area van greatly with development
ervicebei,� , , .
which preceded sewer s� being o��. 15,000 s�. t
f and
, a •d severed development being on 7,000 to •
larger lots an
lots, .
9 j000. sc , ft.
4d The following excerpt Crom pages ll & l2 Of the NPO #3
Plan test states the intent of designating those areas on
• the plan map for suburban. density residential development.
The remaining portion of the neighborhood
designated for single family residential Use
is titled ;.6uburban density deve1opmento. Thjs
rr IwFr wlwINWH,r;4 rynfryr Nw,Wwr+FCFJ An 4w rw»+rFrW-Mru rlr 4r.>=1r AN/MdY•++rl, I, r c+A l, r F w:i 1 wArx+,.'.uo Yo M1^M^rMrrr.w r rr Nvr 1^h
.. ••••••',,••,,••••••,••,•,:::,
»r«w,M:y.,..rw:nFw..rnywDiw^M1 Mnr.++r:w.r o....r„FnD,..».....n..—...«.»....,.roerw•.w+....ww.w„1.,+..„,urFN«w v{«Mwyd,.�Srf~mcMYnuFt»ati'raKUaL1uFalx vw.D/a»r...,r.wrr.. .. ,".,
•
•
:._.,.,,._„..r„.,.::.,,,.,,.- ,«:...............a.:.,.,,...EMI...;.;,....,..r...::..,..,..,rtG,� ...,,,...,M.TM�,., <.
A4 •1*"
page 2 ,
PC Staff Repor•f:
April 6, 1976
• item. 5.3
area is' shown,at a slightly higher density than
the 'foothills ' portion of the neighborhood
because the terrain is more suitable to the
proposed higher density development.
Policy 4 4... Protect the existing suburban
character of this portion of
the Neighborhood from encroachment
' by higher density developments
The maximum overall densit y of •
•h development ~will be 3 dwelling
units or 9 persons .per gross
acre. A higher density of 4 units
a :
p 12 persons per gross acre is
or
possibility within an a . roved
�
planned Unit development.
The Planned unit it development concept cited in the above
I 1
policy allows deviation from the normal zoning standards
when it can be demonstrated that a more desirable .
development will result. it
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
staff recommends' the following amendments be made to Chapter
13
TMC, based on findings above:
Chapter 18,20 shall he aneided to read
Painil°..
Single Residential
g y Zones R--7, R R"15 R-30) .
Under the 4head'in of Sections, a neW section shall be created:
l8:20 ! Lot -y R=10 one
The following sections shall be "amended -b0 include the new
H-10 zone
.. —7 — — 5,
Section 18.20:01.0 : Permitted Uses: In an �, l� 10., R Z
RO zone
Section 18.20.020 Condit. oral arses. In an AR - .
7, -lo;,
R-15, R-30 zone
A new ,beotion shall be created to re
i'leot the lat area and
I
makimUni coverage
18.20,05 , :Lod, �- R-10 zone e In ah R--l0 zone the _a size
)J1 shall be as follows
... ... ....:.....,. ... fqi i M 1 yll lti Ml✓" d .¢n14,1: 1'.:1 lfll 1 '.. ..::: ',:; IY.IW r.. 1 ..i W<,r.fry r ,:M r. '. 1.
,'1/ Mrm'WMa+n:wTryfn..y.aar.IV.TYW.M IwnlliIrt:Nv+M!T'I.IwwiMu.Y'.,,•yY"i^•e.wr.n rwn..,•« .wrgf,n,....nu+.r..«...,....... i w lr d....n.. ..Iry nn WW..:f (I,.i.4ya,1111 H6 u'11Y Iltl•,•••.. .: .,
,77-'77 �,. ,.t,..;h. .:a •,7,. .,,:nA.:•,x .�
µnY� . .,.n. t• :.. '` w4c.. ..1. �,. ".,r• yr . � . a aN � � ., .A H t, r . , —.,,-.�.r ,,a. ,,,,w«G. M,. 7777—r,,•77-7,.a., ..,•7,..,�-M•a• 7 .�.�,, f7 G . • , � : it
��
�; �� PC Staff RepoyM
April 6 1976
I 9
r
' item 5,
(1) The maximum lot area shall be ten thousand sq. ft.
maximum lot coverage shall be thirty-five percent.
(2) The
Section 18,200060 Setback. :Shall be amended to reads
R-7, R-10, or R-30 zones. Except; as may otherwise be
.. .
rovided; in, Sec-�ion 18,20 lOQ the se-�backs in an R-rj, '
P A
R-30, or R-�15 zone shall ,be as follows
Secti•on l8,20:080 Building Height
-, shall. be amended to read:
i
Exe'e p t A84 pi ovided in Section 18.l2 ,x.10 rib building in
an R.7-7, R''...10, R-i5 or. R-30 .zone shall exceed....
J
1
e
rt,
P
•
}
i •
...,., - •i::r1 „:.,,.... ,:;:'.{7•,1 1hY'4mi Mi+4Wf tMWV..it '.t .41ib1! d,.. f t..t.. 4 .f .:1.:: ,.,o;:,, .,wN!ry,, i. Nor 1 f l� '•C11 .ha:l „i.?,
' w+ekMwl•CMMN,w atiAUr•m•NMx�Aw'i.*aa.Mi:ANR ArcAU+,•<',ey!.hRNabl4xn',iw.AV..�...«w., w r S' w• .x.. �w.uN°, N+w.NruvN'N+"YaY'NNI`�M:M 11':IC9f7:[Y�4.."M. L,.1:+ �w•.y,•-• .. �.1 T...I �. r �n a r
N
• - ,.=,.a.,,..t,,.:,....4:,,... ,,,,,,5s....Uk...,.,.5::�,,,.„ a 1,s+i F-k:%,..,.,«C`±Cti_..#.,..,iirtt:AFi;+o...,,,„-,;.: .?TC:ik"104.0.,,,,t ,,,,..;,'rY:Gi,+�\:�te...,�-'lnJ.r......;'.'IU aF�Y.3x. .ew1. 'a-t i.u.WU^ fJ ,..,.,.. .. Ni 1Y.'fl.Y;sili?
+m rvm-+1 k..-.rv...-ra.rw nh.n "a:.;e 1er Y a ,... ..., . ... .
i�OT 1Cip OF PUB L
I C I-
i AR ING '
'
AFFIDAVIT OF i13,i i I ty� q YYY Tigard annn '.Conimissior „t i.,,,, a,'',t A p r l'6 1976',1,,z,,,7.301rn, i„' ;”,' ,
STATE OF OREGON, ',Twarn t ty;DuniaGr .ig a!h*Sch400,1 0• Lec,tuare 1
., ss. i...Spo A'A!.' .te1 4 '^{nKra" 14,,' :'e . ,COUNTY OF WASIHINGTON, r 14650 SW 97tH"Ave,.Tigard,...Or: 97223•
a
5.'PUBLIC'HEARINGS: 1'° 1'A `',74",'',
Cli "t v"d' NAII.'Y E',6 IE ZC�,;
t 5:1 PRELIMI 'R
X ..�A-S-��►�--• ..:::..._..._..:_.�. 2�7t)'�K;jelgaard)�,�fa<��4;,r���a � ),\;Y�;r,t*°.�:�,'
t.».. r a Ira 4�-r e g rd Ya,1 is
'�A, request byrOrlandaIelgaardfora:
: being first duly sworn, depose'and say that I am the publisher - 1,Pre.„.1„11111tri,arY,-
.plah,and"program re,vtieww^' of.i proposed."r"esidentiai;' fanned de.-.1
:rculation, as' defined P, 'Hall 137'8
general c' � •�n,,ttie�a vi j .of` ,
u::::.........._.....,. of The Tigard Times a newspaper of gene y � ., � c�raity, ,.�Co: x..,:
.. '1,: 0" KA"1l' '�( ry,
c ,
13t�40nS n Blvd. , Wash. tax
count ' 'anCl y'map 25`1,;2DD, tax.'lot X500).*-`;fie ;t.
by ORS 193,010 and 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid Y 4'�`(tabled fr"oil March 2 ,1976, meetin 'l
r ;', �. ,` 5.2 "LONE C1=1 A.NGE ZC 8 75 (NPO
+ • .,, .. ., , annexed, �! �+`"'. tik'M't N,�` ;�Ii, 8 ` ' fin:
state. that',the legal notice; a printed copy of which is hereto annexed was �r , • w, ws+ .••.;,. ;� „
' � �w..�i�'c....li".�$..�.nyti}r���� ��.�'��gSk�`s�bH�:+i.,.9ua„a ..�. !ra�r�'.
,' _, 2 l;. ,Request for alprovaI,of,,rexon�ng,of
successive snd _lands,within the.Aboundaiies of".NPO'
published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ... :._. .. -. ,
. r No..3 P1an'for Derry„Dell-Foot.of 13ui1 h.
consecutive weeks in the following issues .._.,_....-a-.._a.-.. ,...--.._.-•--;-•,-.-•-a- ---..---•----•-- ," M Britain':Areha'' toconf'orrrmp with'the i
. , 4 Pt P,� frr ,.'Plan'4,4;as
ad,o" ed. Corn r�eh�nsver M
2
A amen ed „0,1,-•.;P4-'.'1,‘'�� ,
.�:�...w..�_..:..:.__.�...._._,�. . a 5.3 2; NIN ,ORDINA 1t� D
4 � ,y
igna r-)
'Zoning Codes acnendin n Chapter,h 8,20~'
A °io ose• am dm,
r
t • ,.� ° to include a new zoning,clasification i
da of .:a N
_' ' :_.:. fot�3'clicking Units per acre(Z=10);":°
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ,� ...., _- ..--••� "`" Y :a
,, . 5.4 ZONING ORDII`1P,NCF Al�EN1ay`
�a
r4 d MEN`I5 ZO.A.376'.rat t'”; aYY , ..r4 4'�c '
A1)ra l Lg.-..._...
,, , A;riyq;ueat'by;,:the City.of�Ti,gard{�`'
-.'...:•:.... a,.• .,•, ::, �- �h..� , atnending'the land cap!ng standards of'. ,
h /
a "the Zonin Ordinance(Title 18 ection.
' ""'"--..,�--..:,... a. 4--{:.:.-,. r l'ti'bh" of Ure on..''..: ost t 0 o f
, j a.. �. .. `�ual t
8 5$.050) requSrmg t cur.
1" ota y g p ed With the City,„cq o�,110% of
' 1( the cost of the pi bposed landscaping as
'determined by the City;Plarn`niri Direc:`5
M 6 i u• c any
,, �� f n
y expires :..:.:_a.:�-:..a. ..� I.a::�: 19,.;
colnrYtisszou e � � ��:1� r before he�ss�ar���r�r41,y^1`;�”;�Y�.4��1" �1.
erinits 1.. ` w
it ------ ,5, CONI�ITIO ALAftuSE,PERMIT'
• ' S
CU A-re best by yEa l Kesslii er i'o'n
( g ).
s
a side storage,of wood prod>icts. ii`apar`-,
»: eel of land ina'an M.3 (light'industrial) '
zone at 12560 SW Hall Blvd,'(Wash-Co.
Map M� Fehrua lot 24OI j�" .r
tax Ma 2S1 1130, ta:+t
(tabled fro� rye 17, 1976,,,meet�h
5.6 FLOOD PLAIN FILL PERMIT M
x
�r 1'76 (Bartel a . tv i1.''': ?" ,te 1^, ";.„� ,
` A request for a flood plain'fill permit,
•
to fil1 lands presently;=sitdated`awithin
the 100 year;flood plain located 660 ft;'
�' . ''"`soutt 'of Bonita,on '74tH Ave. (.Wash'.
a Co.f tax Iniai3 2S1 12A,tax']otsr1100 and
• 1200):,4 ""':$;M1. M+Y adB',1i`I'' y-- :, , rasa ,y
,6,'SUBDIVISIONS .+ t,,,#,,, .,t,�,;hr
. 6.15 2.76 (Stimmerfieid Phase IV)',,' ',
,:';A request for,approval'of a prelittni-
nary' plat for 131i ae`IV.”`St
immerfield
�Plarined Develop menta loca ted
,east of
t 96th"betvcteen SW Sattler and Durham
1 °lid, (Wash, Co, fax lnep 2S1.11C, tax
�,, 1 lots 1600, `1700, 2000,& 2600; tax Map',
2S1 11D, tax lots 9o0 and 1500)i'!,';/':•':,,!;',"."
• MiSCELLANEOUS,41a dN'rµ , � y`,
I" , An interpretation of'bse'ta deteri-nitie*
Whether a Shaklee Home Products did»•t•
' t,tributor""ship and salesirooni is siimils ''td`
' ''other 'outriht permitted uses 'in'Abe d
'` C-3, gener�al commercial zone,.,v�''e ",
(TT2657 — Publish 3/25/76,4),1/76)''P `
o.,�n+MTWWr,rti+V,.t4XVWX^',.y...wa„laFNMY ikyyl+ael9•"fi,yur atitH,a hn.n.,pw+a ..,r...., -.. n>.
«.o--a.,. ....,•••.»�•.w.•"+.wro .. +,,.rocrtFktmaren'.9'^.um4xYrru.aa3wanmcnxweaauu„rr w...rw,wwriai7,{{,,,.
4. 7 e 1 y , "/ o
MINUTES x'1;1;
Tigard Planning Con fission t..
I�� �Yid
March 16, 1976 7:30 p..m.
f9
• TWaiity Junior High School - lecture room }I
14650 SW 97th Ave. , Tigard, Oregon ':
1. CALL TO ORDER:: The meeting was called to order at7:4O P.m. by
Commissioner Popp in the absence of Chairman Porter.
2. ROLL CALL: Present: Moore, Nicoll, Popp; Saka-ta, Wakem, Goldbach;
staff Bolen and Laws '1';''',
�
Absent: Porter and Ems P.
3.: APPROVAL OE Ml i NUTES: The minutes of 3/2/76 were approved as read. .
4. COMMUNICATIONS: None, ;Y',
y,
5. PUBLIC HEA RINGS 4.
, � z
5.1 CON)ITIONAL USE CU 10--76 (Schorr) ,E:
A request b Michael Scherr for permission to operate a l''s;
by p p. tr
billiard parlor and equipment sales establishment at 12760 ,,,,
SW Pacific Hwy. M'
(continued from March 2, 1976, meeting) t,s
t
A. Staff Report: read by Bolen -- reiteration of the staff '
findings of the 3/2/76 meeting .,
B. Applicant Presentation
o Mr. Schorr stated that he had made a parking lot .:,
survey at the hours of 12:00, 3:00 and 6:30 p.m. a
at Which time he stated that at no time was there
.
fewer than 30 vacant spaces during the weekdays
and during the weekend there Were a minimum of 15
spaces available.
0 Mr. Jim Sutton speaking eakin on behalf of Mr. Scharr,
pointed out to the Commission that an additional 14
�.. spaces were available on the adjoining tax lot for
.1 `the, proposed use '
C. Public Testimony: N'ox e:
1i. y t
. Staff Recommendation: DENIAL, based on findings Stated
in the staff recommendation of
32/76
8. Rebuttal!
,: w o Sutton stated that with the additional 14 parking
sta1s sufficient parking needs wculd be met for
the iro�.osed.
p faci�.it
., rty www i, re M»..,myyµr^sN,.pn...kYMµ'ww pw+r._$-. ',.',:,.P-....o- r ,«2',..:::,";.,',.;.:.;....,,:.,,.: ' ,. ..o! ., ., , I.s,, .., ' ' o '.•""'�'"«'�^" our+.w+x�rm�r:.meeu�rs�+r.rap�nnsMwr.�wrr«��"���1�, .. �.. ,Ik
1 ,
,
r
( '''''' ''
Page 2
PC Minutes
March 16, 1976
F. Commission Discussion and Action:
o Nicol: stated that he felt that staff was saying
that any owner of subject property could not use
• the
insufficient parking
to meet e because
off- there be
street Parking re uirements of the
Code
f o Sakata stated that the
proposed use would generate
more parking needs than were available on the site.
o Wakem asked that, given parkin
Wakem staff t1�.a�L �.vwn -the 14 additional parking
spaces, how much short would off-street parking needs
be?
•
o Popp stated that, upon his observation of this site,
he saw that at no time would there be a parking
problem and that he could not deny a request based
on lack of parking.
•
o Nicoll moved for approval on the findings that there
was
,y need, that sufficient parking existed
o
T w a community
on the site, that no adverse traffic e 'ff'ects woUld'.be
created on Pacific Hwy. and that the applicant had
4 , shown that there were no other suitable sites available
to operate his business,
o seconded (Popp)
o Motion failed by a 4-2 count Nicoli and Popp, aye',
Sakata, Coldbach, Wakem and Moore, no
o Mrr. Schorr was informed of his ,right to appeal the
Planning Commission decision to he City Council. '.
5.2' ZONE CHANGE ZC 8-75 (NPO #3)
Request for approval of rezoning of lands within the boundaries
of NPO #2 Plan for Derry Dell....-Foot of Bull. Mountaa,n Area, to
conform with the adopted Comprehensive Plan, as amended
i r. .. ..a +,
A. Staff' Report: read by Bolen, Bolen gave brief explanation
anation
of the Intent of the zoning pro osals to
brin g lands into conformance with the
_
adopted NPO # land use plan.
B. Public Testimony
w
o Attorney Lou Vasano; speaking on behalf of property
owner Don Pollock, stated that his client had not
received notice of the rezoning hearings
• 'Fk
''''',;\1/4
Mrfo,a vnr,+.h++w-,,,, ,,.. ,�, .. ..
1. .pr.�pnryn,,wmrxer.ry uva17{Nr.Sn<,M gy'^�T•xnmA,w..««1.w�-...r....... .,.�..w"""rl"I .xww•+1m�+.r•T^wV^+5'"r-.+�'wwwpnM1Nq'NxnWaE^J/SCU4S4aGf17'.IMMti9M�AY11+tiAIxVttYipwbwwNtl�P+ .{1tl�
• illy '
page 3
PC Minutes
march 16 1976
o Wakem,asked Fasano if his client was opposed to the
a rezoning.
0 Fasano responded affrmatively, because his client
was losing a unit per acre under the proposed re-
,
zoning and it becomes a matter of economics.
z .
C. Staff Recommendation
o Staff recommended APPROVAL on the condition that the
rezoning riot be sent along to the City Council until:
g g
M � by an �.-7 0 zone has .been aged upon b the Planning
Vommiss .on
r rr
o Nico1i recommended tabi,, g this item.
0 Sakata mot on.ed to postpone until the Commission can
act on the R-10 zoning ordinance amendment.
w o Seconded (Nicoll) .
o Approved unan.irously
5.3 CONDITIONAL USE CU 11-76 (Ir.ag and Community
Youth Services)
A request by Tigard unity Youth Services, Inc. to ()pert- ,
�.
ate ea youth counselling center in a C-3 (general commercial)
) . r
zone at 13400 SW Pacific Hs-y. (Wash. Co. tax map 251 2CC,
tax lot, 100) .
A. Staff Report: read by Laws,
T3. Applicent Presentation
c
, �; .y for the applicant, pr.eaexited
. o Pat Furrer� attorn.e
the re or the
youth counseling center,
r
out the established community g
pointing
Ong
�x y need fur. such a�
r .
o Mime Pieracci, counselor for tie rd osed center,
stated the program hours of operation would be fom k
: oon u�ti� 8;00 p.m,
r,, r
C. Public Testimony '
o Larry Shannon, the Bloard Chairan of the Tigard Youth
Services) thanked the people of Tigard for their
assistance in the proposed youth counseling center. .
D. Staff Recotmandationi APPI.CVAT With the fol lowtng conditio fts
r,
That a conditional use permit be granted for a
period of ori.e (1) year.
•
;r
4
r .,. r.'.x..4r+,w..exmlry, ,♦::r..,., . ."�,,d,xe3r..oµu. Nt r r
,p,.y..tr.w+w+r++1 MTV^•^t''n+M grrxv +✓ru.rlry'.++14 r4.i•hp.eal^ry.•V v` ...ruiwn w.u•M.T4/v'+✓F.M'rtu+Nfctldktle Y "' •-
•
• •
,
•
L�Q page 4 ,��r
' PC Minutes
3/16/'76
•
•
2. That if the applicant desires an, extension. of the •
permit at the' end of -the the sit, •
•would Ue subject to full, site improvemei1ts, to
include landscaping and paved parking areas to be
approved by the besign Review Board.
E.
Rebuttal: None. {
F. Commission Discussion and Action
o Nicola, stated that he disagreed with staff is one ..
year.cond tiolla1 use proposal on the basis that it
•would be dictating the-Commission's action at which
•
time this cond�;tional use proposal would be subject
to revtiew and subsequent renewal.
o Wakem moved for approval with staff recommendations.
o Na.coli seconded.
o 'Unanimously approved.
5.4 VA .UANCE V. 2-76' (Hakola)
• A request by• Jerry nakola to grant an exception to the TMC
for_ � -� and Setback Requirements a
Section 18' 30 040 Front Y
Section 18.60.120 Mini mu Space Requirements fo.� Off-
, l20 -
g, ,C.31v1. (General Commer cial Main. St. ) zone
atr1 380aSWa;MainnSt (Wash. Co. tax ma 281 2AB, tax lot 4000L -
.at .2305 St. C p g
. that . ; g n this item,
o Mr Nicol.i excu;�ed hmsel.� from sittin. in o
stating that he had had exparte contact with the applicant.
•
A. Staff ;Report: read b
A, by 8o1eri
B.
Applicant Presentation-
o 'Charlotte Olson, designer for the proposed project,
stated the• reasons for the variance request and
y the 'p q
answered v'erba�.�. �h:e hardsh� uestions as they.
Pertained to :.Section .19,76,020 of the C .
•
C'. Public Testimony. None. t
Staff recommendation: APPROVAL, subject jec to the condition•
that contingent upon the construction of a municipal.
pa king lot on the present feed. store propeDtyatc
Main and Tigard Streets, Mr. 1akola would agre e
provide his share off' the construction Costs, Of such
a pro, ect+ 11'is share of the cost would be for the
construction. of 4 parin sta .s.
1
:Wan +ap n n,a.rmarurtMmanrtruar
.. r w......:w.+..M a«w.w,x.gc.a•i»»rsa oe...y„y„rnmaxr.-rir•x ,.,,r-v.•—«- .y.. .»u,ww..r,«r......,..... •vw:www,;W,w,�.
page 5
PC Minutes
3/16/76
E. Rebuttal
o Staff read into the record a letter from Charles
McClure, (Main St. property' owner) in favor of the
Proposed p project. In addition to Mr. McC°Lure 's
approval., staff informed the Cormrnission that Mr.
Ralph P' ters (Main St. property owner) had stated
pp project
his approval of the x o ect as weal.-
.
F. Commission Discussion a1.d Action
o Wakem made a- motion for ,approval of the front y rd
setback variance of 2* ft. 'waivering the parking
lot requirements and subject to the condition as
stated by staff.
• 0 Seconded (Moore) '
o "Unanimously approved.
5;5 VARIANCE V -76 (Bishop)
A request b ,Wilbur' ishop to grant en exception to the
ipal Code, aeon 18. 0 040 - Front `Yard set-
Re...�.��r Sect
c�. al .Code
Tigard quire s a C--3M zone (general commercial Main
8t, ) , located at 12296 SW Main St. (Wash. Co. tax map
2S1 2AA. tax lot 5000)
A. staff Report: read by Bolen
3;, Applicant Presentation:
Whittaker, u p _ j , . nted
for the ro pct
comma
o
oni itintheastaffere report and stated the intent
of the variance menti on in the .. s o ' : . the' :
�
6 reti�onS o '
h' s on the sub ect property. He further stated
hardships�.p
that there was room to maneuver cars in the area
shown on the submitted .site plan without backing out
q
..41, onto Main St. � This would rG urea hot�,tever, apprQxi -
matel . 4 maneuvers to accomplish the turn:. Whittaker
further stated that this waC a request for a setback
I' y J �
variance and not a parking variance, although a problem
1 ,
with parking does' exist.
o Wilbur Bishop, the applicant, explained to the Com-
missior.ers the setbacks from the property lines to
the existing buildings ldings both nyslzop's property and
Washington Vederal Savings & Loan) k
b�.ac Testirme1iy
o Staff read into the record
a letter from Charles
' �.,.-e,;uhwu.w,y. "r""T a+roa..,*t+, v,+..r.�,«writ wem.v......,..». '` wNwwvwa.,rW...ww.,•.w.�nwrr.,...w.w ...r1 ,„I ,v 1 i C.,r v n ,r fr-. ... _,.
' w"'^1A°A+tIM V',4HYtYtpl,N1d,i1',(]: t.}j,yr. •pU:'1.pkEa..iNOQM1awntNJW ,y '
r •.ar.r.. G.r :y ..N1r r1.,',.r... -r. ,.(.lK {\fY .,1.
a page 6
,,;„; PC minutes
3/16/76
McClure.' (Main St. property owner) stating his
approval of the proposed project.
,Staff Recommendation: APPROVAL
E. Rebuttal: None
` F. Commission Discussion and Action
k
,
L
0 Wakem moved for approval of the variance to encroach
Si ft. into the right-of-way on the basis that the
proposed project was highly desirable.
o Seconded (Sakata) .
Unanimously approved.
5.6 SIG ` COVE REVISION SCR 1-76
A proposal to amend the Tigard Sign Code (Chapter 16, TMC)
to establish free-standing sign
size standards according traffic
speed and number of travel lanes and to eliiinate
free-standing sign
., i , _ lot frontage
size restric�t�.ons used ora
also to reduce the maximum ....ermissible height to 25 ft..
P g
. Y,
A. Staff Report
. 1
o Doen explained to the Commissioners t he a
ntent
of
e proposed revisions as they pertain to:
1. free-standing signs
2. Wall signs
5 signing in shopping centers and commercial
r” ►
4. , window display signs '
r 5, awning, cano py and marque Signs ,.
6. incidental signs
E. Public Testimony: None
di r Staff Recommendation
Staff recommended that the comments made by the Com-
missioners during the course of i i
dscusson on the sign
code be taken and incorporated within a redrafting of
the sign oode.
D Re`butta : None
rr. mmiaeson ' iseus
soon and Aoition.
-,. .r'*w..m..,,,uerun.w..n• .+n«Y.,.wyUrrnueea m. ,.n..r
�"""N. in,rmkMrm,'+r Mme*r rvfrvr•u...... •r•.••• rl»,TnWw++Wr..a.ww is..+wnplM�M wYOkfMAFISMa711,di".Tb.L:✓1It'�t14GtikY•r31't4'uiyN'MTMW"idr+ 1vM` 1 r r
«.w,.iM,,.Y1;�w.i.....':;.-.s,a... ;:+::_ .�vk r:..r-,m..�e: ir, r..,
' F
5, p'age 7 �'
f. PC Minutes
3/i6/76 .
.
, '' , 0 Sakata motioned to continue the hearing' on the` sign
r ,
code revision at a later Planning Commission hearing.
r>` ' 0 • Seconded (Go1dbach) . r
,,, o. Unanimously approved.
a
. a
.v
.
, 5 7 ' ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: ZOA 2 .76
t A proposed a iendnent of the Tigard. Zoning Code to amend
,.. chatter 18.20 to include a ,.new zoning ciasoification� for
3 dwelling units per acre (R-1O) .
Staff informed the Commission that a' public hearing notice
had ,not been given in the local. newspaper and therefore
r . should nit be heard' at this time and that this item should ;i
ently w' ._ � ._ O #3 re2oning' at the nett•be hc;ard conGU.x r a.th the NPO 7�.
Planning Commission meeting of 4 /
,
" 6. 0 R BUSINESS 1
i
6.1- CONDITIONAL ,USE REVIEW CU 21='.-75
Conditiohal use revOw of Geor g±a-Pacific• C
orporation
rs
.
`bake d-out oven.
0. Laws informed the Commission that a condition of the
permit for a bake-out' oven on the Georgia-p'acif'ic site 1, . :
was that it be subject to review within 90 days after
operation) had begi.n1. Providing,g deleterious
' 'n ghat no
efi eots had been. generated from.,the use ,,
of this oaten, ,;
the conditional use permit would. a.emain i. of ecte '7
/
a
o The Co u ission chose to"p ost o�e ac t`�on on this matter ter
a
until Commissioner 'Ems was p resent to comment on this
item. '
7. Ali�'OUi NNT Nt': 1l:00 p�.m
r
,
C
Jar .; rrFa,u,rri:.11r , ..'..a.. '.Y ,.a ,rs:n,. rc v.rr ,�rr,r �,:rrnin. .r.
,.r. r,...., ,rr< � y,a,, wr, is
r r
wrr-�.w.rer�>..r,wr^o-�vr4...rrkn:�a•.:n�µtw+k.°>rt�,..rv....rr.... ... � �+N++n M iV:rFt"�rV�+�.Sfd:'�„rm.raaiww+tir us�u..w.,.,,,rw .w«...,w+.��1o,t ry .,r
{
x.51 .4, d�_., ., .I:. .1' 1: .f,r a:!.iw- u....u.. ,a n.r..n• a er.,.e.,;:k w.n:.It*' v n, r.w � as ,w Y.v"::n,r ...u.• t,
O . .‘--- - i f ,, EN--r--
t i
.:..,. . , i a, ,,„ i.,.. L L--q--1 1:L I L.1.} ( • .' : 1` '.. !''.• II
. e
� ''��11 y ntwrY.+n,in,n�nt ul� n+n..•rnl. Mil
« r® Laic.? it' .i ., s'�jf r' ts, �® /i
�' *I. gik wit �� + � n 4.YS'}I +4Af+l� • A,n, ►A�:? +t«N°���t' t ® yt' F i o' �M...
.r : '� �, +c�S k'� +'.Y« ..- tie F{�t'I�r 3 �f'•+M�yt7�`J ®i +�! ` a71�, ®® �� I
7' c«A .r{Y x ,V$Yi.i „..., ! 1 1'.'t? y''�. 4 7 , ® I {L�
`� .,,:. " M,t96 ", yf,M. ';!t,�,s,0,. e a' M,,. , ∎. .i.01,,„,,,Tr
,., 'J r{r A�, r
1i-i, u + .,......r IIvr4Is ., Y �® , ' ' 44 ' "fr ®„ � ,. ■� �kfrt't L,' i :•`;�®”. h: �'iir:',, � 4,. .Y ,:nr
.• .' y f,.,. RAm Y MS/.,R.,,,,,,s + �,, ' :N4�. ,,, i�~,, ^k 4 (?,, t' �ir ASj!, ,}
y Isis ," ` - t,..'.` yr� Y ! w+', .1„� � {fie k.4Z�`�tW+C,"'ti wSn`������ ®�` •' , +• r `�����-
{' tt,?i c ,y.._.I G?'u'f°i$ti.+° +°«." i �.,.�� •-, 1"'r+ ^" .� .,.:� 3� �"`iYNx� "�,.,. L t an k I I �:., it r'.�"•` ` :` r:FN r ,ill C. ,�r +" 'r'a +e + 1. E1 ® «X 1,,,:�i, - �. • ? r a.F - .'Yl gg a.5
iYw.,1�G.« Rt*.:ie4v
„'':'1”: f' - , ® <.1.1.11 .,-•• t w4 l':,.*i1Sj t'�,tC•' w .ice - ,` '' : )_If
r+'�.t8''. r'' r4ar• . .+.: q�' "S!'.:•�.,�ynt•+::� , i �' [rF Ir'+�14 + �, ; �,' ar I N, � t c• a ,e►', ^'11'7**-" rr�+,,.. ... ,AI+7 .wr�ln1 q,}4" 'Y,a+�' , ! 1' S M '4+ry^} i�k�"••", 1MI �1.. u! '�`.1 l� 'fi h .';',;(s ?. . �'. :+.d �, ,„,,,,i.: I ',.t .pi 4F'+fit,' ; Allig Y1 m.I.. _ \O *t O ii..-_+« ..' , r. ”t ±"" yp 2 �t+AV, H �/► I�d' 7' s� BBB i`N' ,+ ��1 , Sxy�b sti I� � ,I�,y� tf u r «nvlt ...r.M.
•� « �««� r I r x's��,'.y��+tip `�� .r •-,,., 'a;t� �• ��:• "�, '� Er �1� ,p'° t y + 1'd'�?,; c.• 4g�1 ;reps Mi ?. .4{ 1,.; 1, d:..,... px'i. vtt,•t,{}y.,,,, 1.,it, ,..41.,044',,N.. ,T +2: in NKOMO -. "ii, w "' ®® .,Y ti�..
k ." ,, JMSt,1 1 •:fr tiKS,, 4 Y+1r*ty t+' ..' .*• Ie1 Is k Kr ,. ,3,s, t� ,1�
. a:R.` h«3;"�"�'t"""'+'w '� �51 `�•..+ �•. ,� i
• N 'lGH ORHO .* s,f1�jLrAVL;UI
} M u y µ .:.4:1 :, A,ggi gm!+ _.....,
,PL.b , +IREE v ,+.wjti, 4 ®� r , t�I+ , 49r u 7 i ti 1 , r'...., l SS Ir
,�.: " - �' #t1'iipefJ'4�f�' mi `,•'n■ 09i i •,..4. �,,,,is :4*-tf Fii,„t�1` '4.:,.,,7.. 1.+;„ 1.- i R. _i_r! ...r ,.J —..•,•
L i`.�i 1f't. . ;URJtiitl, ',tf” i i',rib',f 1,,,5,,tii.';0,,'v'i �v+ „' ,. t» it . 1 -
10 t µ Xt t it :?„ t r .f N ..-
+ . ..:,..., - t ,• � 1,.S�k � i���1 �A�a� •� a p�«y � i +
(� +\ 1 'Pr"�'f +`u � � ;Vt.? 67 'k; dy �
(1��!�-�i('•� -jam , u n p, t �fy
�GSII,JE If''�I .. t .. .f yl•?. kil, � +� +i. �a�.l C' n te,•1,+ `4 �A"•IS _ +..
` ht
r�y� A�
b S ,RUib=h Loth Density ,I wx� ,,,v
, ,' t4,, r.fi+,t W d r, f nrJA _Mil
CO 1 E ill w. + y, .,. 4 + � iA — ,�. i Y:t7 � cYt.�, $ �1®1 1 —.4x
1
Mai . . .• r r asp 1
I
. I ,, ,....1 ?"---'" , 1,--..-....., 1 iii ll lin 11
Y
li
Y7
NINON { I r
�qI 0$=1 SY .``" ®
y�ir pill �1:�' C''x• r + ' ' ' f ...i.♦ NN - •,.
4,./t -
/ Yt,w. ,. �==- 1. s r .: r «... ....—..+u✓� -'1.t 7 t '.),1 1 t\ -•
A 9#
}
99
i / -4, I '
' s,h
I
I ,. 'F''t r o nAVO. +r,:' J ',.''M10Sili* M I•ft4;M; m-`R+ i,`„r�'a.44747.
•
*+aran+•..rvn„+e..w.w,urt,w«.+:7b^.Y_ .'.�:rr.aw+.w,.nnrw.n ,rr�n,, r ..+••r....:...........,e,....»..., ..:..,,,,.. ,w..••+•�;e k+,w,nn*t1xt„R't«rrrSr�rA'Swz�1'd M1rtf.`emei�uunm'w,, war,M,nn—ir+•w.r6jt '+ �