The URL can be used to link to this page

VAR1-84 POOR QUALITY RECORD PLEASE NOTE: The original paper record has been archived and put on microfilm. The following document is a copy of the microfilm record converted back to digital. If you have questions please contact City of Tigard Records Department. ••., . ' � k 1 .dA BOND PARK II '& III V 1-34 1c5t,.11 1900,20G. 2S1 12CD 16.00 t . • , • • } X ' 4 t a'ly= W .t4 f irirtd z7 ,,'.f"'>�...�4 P'�.+�.k a"«Y.,,x1/ SiN3 t s f ''`a II 5' r 1 •. / ��7�'��'.,.�. q�"1""'�iTLRFJ�"a�r 'N.a+cdr TT•�<']�.�.tn��,�y��•�c•�,l�Ptw �•Fe ;,•: • is CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION -: BY PLANNING COMMI3SION fr. 1. Concerning Case Number(s) : Variance V l�_8J Bann PARK `TT III 2. Name of Owner: Waverl oast +. ,�r / Gero;e & Barb Koch 3. Name of Applicant: Waverly Construction Company I Ken Waymire Address 10183 SW Riverwood City__Tigard State Or Zip 97223 4. Location of Property: Address Between SW 79th and '81st Avenue and north of SW Durham Road Legal Description 2S1 12CC Tax Lots 1900, 200 and part of 100 5. Nature of Application: Request for a variance to City standards to allow sidewalks on only one side of the interior streets. Also a variance from the setback standards for an R-12 z. .- .r. e == -•- - side yards, . .. 4-foot interior side yards, and 15-foot rear yards. 6. Action: Approval as requested XX Approval with conditions per Planning Commission minutes and Denial staff report. 7. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: The applicant & owners Owners of record within the required distance • XX The affected Neighborhood Planning, Organization XX Affected governmental agencies 8. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON March 12, 1984 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision, and statement of condition can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 12755 SW Ash, P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. 9. Appeal Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is March 12, 1984 . 10. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department, 639-4171. V!'ce- Pres i ient, Tigard Planning Commission "ATE A•PROVED t • '' N O T I C E O F P U B L I C HEAR I N G <:. • „ Notice is hereby given that the Tigard Planning Commission, at its meeting on Tuesday, February 21 , 1984 _ at 8:30 P.M. , in the lecture room of Fowler Junior High School, 10865 S.W. Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, will consider the following application: FILE NUMBER: \ l APPLICANT: Waverly Construction Co. OWNER: Koch/Tousey ,c 10185 SW Riverwood Lane Tigard, Oregon REQUEST: For a variance to city standards to allow sidewalks on only one side of the interior streets of Bond Park II and III. The applicant also requests a variance from the setback standards for a R-12 zone to allow 18 foot garage setbacks, 10 foot f street side yards, 4 foot interior side yards, and 15 foot rear yards. The property is designated medium density residential and is zoned R-12. LOCATION: Between SW 79th and SW 81st, north of Durham Road. (Wash. Co, Tax Map 2S1 12CC lots 100, 1900, 2000, and 2S1 12CD lot 1600). (See map on reverse side) The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the , rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Community Development Code and rules of procedure of the Planning Commission. Any persons having interest in this matter may attend and be heard, or testimony may be submitted in writing to be entered into the record of the initial hearing. For further information please contact the Planning Department at 639-4171. TIGARD CITY HALL, 12755 S.W. Ash Avenue (Corner of Ash Avenue & Burnham Street) (pm/0257P) DORBURf - PLACE?, SCALE •::,,33 ,.2 r„ zzx h I�� 100 .�.,.. , _ .... .1 55alF E N 89°S6• : 400 300 ' •00 D 55/AC SEE ,.. • i 73 AC 3.78AC I /5 AC 2S i i ili II r .. ." -.-x . ,• 329.34" S�45a � . S" • 1900 W ",, 200 188 AC D ,94 AC JB$ i - cx t4 1 •. N' 13 t- . i z 1800 , m n ; W p -5 Ac . .. 't. N 9 gr TBOT .1"w m --t z. i •_ N = n z 8_ _ 1 I M.S 6689) 0 2c0 J .. • -t 800 a - .,,a , I 1600 1700 300 (I 1 J4 AG i t 3,B4-4C. -.0 79 AC - 300 N• i ., 1 as i l'-_ 1 { 13 74 0:11, i E tle r 1500 ll'- -1 20,,44, it.,-..„,.' i' c0 ',...,...'''.:,`....., . ' ...4 ...v..._, j ti 3 T 900: q�yj 'I ,,7 y ` T Q� �, A 290, 3303,^ . V T 4 # it 1400 6CC lit'l _ 20:70 202 fi3 — 2?Z ;... 330.80`. .. , ! , i 750' 150 - 292.0]' ,;.00' 170.00 T { •.., 1 4 89'Sc 20-.' . 1 1500 1700 1600 i , 2000 5 a 6 ' v, e C- /.0Z.GC 134 AC 2 32.GC I r.AC /.90AC. .. } w a R� � ,f bN 1 t Y ° $ b' m ea•9' I GS 19081.T Q 2 I C.S.20188 r )� J 1200 1300 $- a ,3 z' <_ - 1000 .• i z a gv B6AC Sin 4C_ i K3°56£ 4 � — _ I i .{ i `100' i+ 1` • o Bob Bledsoe, 11800 SW Walnut, NPO # 3 Chairman. The developments they were concerned with were Park Place, on 121st and Gaarde; and Park Square, on Pacific Highway and Park Street. They felt there were lots of decision being made and set by staff and that more citizens needed more input. They felt the NPO needed to be notified sooner of projects and that a monthly report should be established showing status of developments. 0 LaValle Allen, 7450 SW Hermosa` NPO 4, otherwise know as the Terrific Tigard Triangle. This area is ready to explode. There is a LID in the process. They were concerned that they hear about new' developments in a timely manner. Also, that the established ` residential areas be protected. , • 0 Debra Naubert, 14365 SW 80th Place, NPO # 5, is concerned about the_ time response on developments. Not being able to have input prior to staff reports. They were concerned about the density in residential areas being compatible with existing areas. Discussion followed regarding NPO comments on the staff reports. o Phillip Pasteris, NPO 6 stated their area of concerns are Durham Road, with regard to weight limits and width of the street; possible ,r.; overcrowding in the schools; traffic circulation for. Hall Blvd. and McDonald St. improvements; that the ,cenic area (Little Bull Mtn. ) be preserved. Also, they would like a copy of their minutes put into the files reflecting their recommendation. o Yvonne Larson, 10730 SW North Dakota, NPO # 7. Their main concern was that the upper limits for density seemed to be pushed.. Also they ' were not able to receive staff assistance when they requested it. Another concern was the errors which resulted from the applicant supplying the names of surrounding property owners, resulting in notice not being delivered to correct addresses. Discussion followed { regarding notification, process. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS vice President Moen opened the public Tearing by reading the procedures to be followed during the hearing. 5.1 VARIANCE V 1-84 BOND PARK II and III NPO ,# S A request by Waverly Construction Co. for a variance to City standards to allow sidewalks on only one side of the interior streets of Bond Park II and III. The applicant also request a variance from the setback standards for a R-12 zone to allow 18-foot garage setbacks, 10-foot street side yards, 4-foot interior side yards, and 15-foot rear yards. o Associate Planner Liden made staff's recommendation to deny the proposed reduction in sidewalks, the 15-foot front yard, the 18-foot garage setback and the 4-foot side yard and to approve the 15-foot rear yard, 10-foot street side yard (applicant required to meet vision clearance requirements in Section 18.102 of the Development Code.), and side yards of 5 feet rather than 4 feet. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 21, 1984 Pagel • fSeyy •' 9 1 • o NPO/CCI COMMENTS Debra Naubert, NPO # 5 Chairperson,_ stated the NPO was not aware, of the variance requests when they reviewed this .' application and asked that it be tabled in order for the NPO to • F :.' review. 0 APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION Ryan O'Brien, representing Ken Waymire, agreed with staff's recommendation. They would rather have the four foot, but would settle for five. Also, they felt the reduction of the sidewalk would make the project more desirable with less cement. PUBLIC TESTIMONY o John Swartz, 15900 SW 76th, opposed application as it had not been reviewed by the NPO and also because there was some problem regarding an agreement for an easement for sewer had not been fulfilled. o Dorothy Gage, 8000 SW 54th, Portland, Or., supported the NPO's r.'quest for postponement. She claimed that allowing these variances would increase the density and would reduce the value of her property. CROSS EXAMINATION AND kEBUTTAL o Commissioner Moen requested staff to outline what existing code requires, what applicant is requesting and staff`s recommendation. o Required Requested Recommendation Front yard 20 15 denial 20 Garage 18 denial Street side yard 20 10 approval Interior side yard 10 4 approve 5 ft. Rear yard 20 15 approval Sidewalks both sides one side denial o Commissioner Moen asked staff what effect easement had on this application. Planning Director Monahan stated it had no effect. `.< o Discussion followed regarding variances being requested are the same as want is allowed in an R 7 zone. Density is less than if they had developed as R-12 PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED o Consensus of the Commission was to support staff's recommendation. Commission Vanderwood expressed her concern for visual clearance on a 10 ft. street sideyard setback. Also she did not see the need to reduce the rear yard setbacks. o Commissioner Owens moved and Commissioner Peterson seconded to deny the proposed reduction in sidewalks, the 15-foot front yard, the 18-foot garage setback, and the 4-foot side yard and to approve the 15-foot rear yard, 10-foot street side yard, and side yards of 5 feet rather than 4 feet. The applicant shall still , be required to meet vision clearance requirements in Section 18.102 of the Development Code. Motion carried by unanimous vote of Commissioners present. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 21, 1984. Page 3 • • • • STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 5.1 FEBRUARY 21, 1980 7:30 P.M. , TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION FOWLER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 10865 S.W. WALNUT TIGARD, OR 97223 A. FINDING OF FACT 1. General Information CASE: Variance ' V1-84 Bond Park II and III REQUEST: A request by Waverly Construction Co. for a varian e to City standards to allow sidewalks on only one side of the '•: interior streets of. Bond Park II and III. The applicant also requests a variance from the setback standards for an - R-12 zone to allow 18-foot garage setbacks, 10-foot street side yards, 4-foot interior side yards, and 15-foot rear yards. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: R-12 RECOMMENDATION: To deny the proposed reduction in sidewalks provided the 15-foot front yard, the 18-foot garage setback, and the 4-foot side y and and to approve the 15-foot rear yard, 10-foot street side yard, and side yards of 5 feet rather. than 4 feet. The applicant shall still be, required to meet vision clearance requirements in Section 18.102 of the Development Code. APPLICANT: Waverly Consta:uc ion Co. OWNER: George & Barb Koch 10183 S.W. Riverwood 400 E. Division St. Tigard, OR 97223 Sherwood, OR 97140 S.W. - S.W. Durham LOCATION: Between S 79th and 81st Avenue and north of Road (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12CC, Tax Lots 1900, 2000 and part of 100) . LOT AREA: 8.88 acres NPO COMMENT: No written comments have been received from NPO #5. 2. Back round Bond Park I was approved by the Planning Commission for both a subdivision and planned development in July, 1983. In conjunction with the planned development application, variances were granted for the required setbacks of the A-12 zone allowing 4-foot side yards instead o,E STAFF REPORT V1-84 PAGE .' 10 feet and 15-foot front yards where 20 feet was required. Variances' to allow an 18-foot garage setback and the deletion of some sidewalks - were denied. The rear yard requirement for the A-12 was 10 feet. On November 15, 1983, the Commission approved a preliminary plat for Bond Park II (59-83) which consists of 24 single family lots. On January 3, 1984, a modification of the preliminary plat was approved by the Commission. Bond Park III, just received Commission approval for a preliminary plat for 33 lots on February 7, 1984. l:,_' The applicant is now applying for several variances to the standards set forth in the Community Development Code. Listed below are the City standards and the requested variances. Required setback (R-12) Proposed setback Front yard 20 feet 15 feet Distance to garage 20 feet 18 feet Street side yard 20 feet 10 feet Interior side yard 10 feet 4 feet Rear yard 20 feet 15 feet Also the applicant is proposing to have a sidewalk on only one side of the majority of the internal streets. The attached map, provided by the applicant, indicates the proposed sidewalk locations for Bond Park II and III. The applicant indicates that a sidewalk on one side of the street will adequately handle pedestrian traffic and that it will result in a more aesthetically pleasing atmosphere. Except for the 4-foot side yard and 18-foot garage setback, all of the setbacks requested are the same as those required in the R-7 zone. B. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE The Code provides for the Planning Director to consider variance applications. However, this variance is intended to be considered in conjunction with the proposed subdivisions which are and^r the purview IV. of the Planning Commission. Section 18.134.050 of the :ode lists the following criteria for granting a variance. 1. The proposed variance will not be t►,.aterial ly detrimental - to the purposes of this Code, be in conflict with the ':. • P P policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards; and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; A`,. .. 2. There are spec i.al crcumsf:ances that exist which are peculiar' to i. . the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; 4 .., 3. The use proposed will be the same a City p p .. permitted under this Code and Cit standards will be mairtitained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible, while permitting some economic use of the , land; STAFF REPORT - V1-84 - PAGE 2 P r 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the Code; and • 5. The hardship is not self-imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. C. AGENCY COMMENTS The Tualatin Rural Fire Protection District and the City Building Division have no objections to the request. The Engineering Division objects to the portion of the request relatiing to sidewalks. The Division has no objection to the setback reductions provided that ';proper visual clearance at intersections is maintained. D. ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION - The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to support the request to eliminate some of the sidewalks over the objection of the Engineering Division. Also, a similar request for Bond Park I was denied. The lots in Bond Park II and III are relatively narrow (typically 50 feet) and 10-foot side yards will make placement of single family residences difficult. Four-foot side yards were allowed in Bond Park I, however, problems can arise since most utility easements are 5 feet in width. Because of the City's action on the first phase of Bond Park and the narrowness of the lots in Bond Park II and III, 5-foot side yards :- and 10-foot street side yards appear to be appropriate. After initiating this project, the zone on the property was changed from A-12 to R-12. This also increased the rear yard requirement from 10 to 20 feet. The applicant is requesting rear yards of 15 feet as allowed in the R-7 zone. Given the circumstances relating to the City initiated j. zone change, this variance appears to be justified. The lots in the development typically range from 90 to 120 feet in depth. There appears to be adequate space to meet both the 20-foot , front yard and 20-foot garage setback without a reduction in the standards. This is especially true if the above mentioned rear yard variance is granted. Also, a reduction of the garage setback to 18-feet was denied in Bond Park I. E. RECOMMENDED. MOTION Should the Planning Commission decide to adopt the staff recommendation, . the following motion: should be made: STAFF REPORT - VI-84 - PAGE 3 w 6 K..= "Move to deny the proposed reduction in sidewalks provide j the 15-foot ,, front yard, the l8-foot garage setback, and the 4-foot side yard and to l'' approve the 15-foot •rear yard, 10-foot street side yard, and side yards [? The applicant shall still be require of 5 feet rather than 4 feet. 5 meet vision clearance requirements in Section 18.102 of the Development l F Code." . .-' t*,...'..'.'-.'., / /7 , . i,,, , . . ..• la 2 /5-/6 .---/ PREPARE o. BY: eith Liden • 'PPROVED BY: William A. Monahan �• .. Associate Planner Director of Planning & Development _ ' : m 0315P)) �� (KL.pJ . 1 t F I, r. f, C. , STAFF REPORT - vv1--84 - PAGE 4 77th,, ,, (, '''' - , . ' , .' . if(...,..., AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING j STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ` : rein first duly sworn, on oath depose and sa I, �,� � mil• ,c�� ' g �' y* That I am a Secretary for s. The City,;of Tigard, Oregon. That I served notice i.ce of hearing of the Tigard Planning Commission of which the attached is a copy (Marked xhibit A) upon each of the following named persons on the f0 day of 19134',. by mailing to each of them at the address shown on the attached list (Marked Exhibit B), said notice as h veto attached, desposited in the United States Mail on the /0 day of 6ia ,�„ , 1984 postage prepaid. Atft''' . 11,!!r 4(4(.: ; ,.._,:‘ .,,,,c,ilejlir ,. Secretary -,. Person who delivered to POST OFFICE Subscribed. and sworn to before me on the day df , 198 ',,,f,;..."' � Kh-' •r*% 'R .. . r ,()If 5 • r „ zeta •r, *" Awl ---)--5..i-- 1...../..Ke._,�../i .r* ,.,, ' 0 #, \`-- • NO ARY-PUBLIC OF OREGON . tJ*' My Commission Expires2"--=� -•aemr> c4{> ';1 n (D w v 00 ®Q 0(� 0 c O _.Ti a N 2 n` z n b N°n v c� (D * rt U t3 n ,.. (n O O. -w_ 0 D —C � a H.o.. '0 Cl, -f O m � o B C' < C n n N'� o •-* w X o< n Q N(� H _: : C C!3 w> to : - ° • nom O Oo cr,11, 0 t j< 8' -a c, Pi >G w t� `K,ri O '' O D C (D __,_ o 63 0 D D 0 0 �' O. = .O ( 3 (D kJ 0 9 CD C/3 ! N W '* z No. ti O .� I-. Q., . CD C�. -.• m c -0 H 3 ®. p di` O 0oo n '%. p c O m -� C3. 51-,' p C? 0 w �« ' �. ..c co _ : �--.• 7 V 0 o .:j = 1 C:1 CD CD 0_ 0 �. 0, '' W CP O? = _ co > SIC" TU:e4,fofl�wing,;wii be.tcoi idea tiE by the.Ti ard'.'Piah.ning commission of , 0 0, o February 21, 1984,at 7;89 P. t�F'pwie :'�un1or Hi`g cho`o1 Lecture Room,' < (D 1O865:`SW t allnut,-Tigard,Oregon.Further information may be obtained from '4 r Z the Director of Planning and Development at 12755 SW dish. Ave., Tigard ; Oregon 97223.or by calling 6394171. . ' Study session between Planning Commission and NPO'S: . • ARIANCE I'14 1BOND PARK II and BOND PARK III NPO#5 A request by'Waverly Construction Co.for a variance to city standards to allow sidewalks on only one side of the interior streets of Bond Park II and III. The applicant also requests a variance from the setback stand- m ards for an R-12 zone to allow 18 foot garage setbacks,10,foot street.side 0-. ..:_al ards,4 foot interior side yards,and,15 foot rear yards.The property is rri,esign'ated.medium density residential and is zoned R-12. Located at: r--= etween SW 79th and SW 81st, north of Durham Road. (Wash. Co. k .eY# -Pd.d. 1' ap 251"'12C lots 100, 1500,2000,and 2S1 12CD Slat 1600). w NED DEVELOPMENT P1)1-84 Rosebud Enterprises Inc.NPO#7 i` N • 'request,°or conceptual plan approval for 34 single family zero lot line' .-1, °OD • t tilling uititi.'on 7.31 acres:"The property is°designated Medium Density sidentinr-i n'd Open Space.It is,zoned R-7PD.Located at SW,I06th,Ave 'd.SW Black;.Diamond Way.`(Wasbh.,Co.Tax Map.1S1`34AD lot 2600). NED,DEVELOPMENT PD 3-84 iVISION 11-83 t ! "S CHANGE ZC 2-84, ANCE V 6-83 Colony Creek Estates Ii;III,IV NPO#4' ret nest by Titan Properties for a zone change' from: R-12,to •R-12 's 61 Development (PD) for a 2.49 acre parcel.;Also,a request for a ceitual.and detailed plans approval of a Planned.Development as'well preliminary plat.approval on 15,27}acres.A variance to alto zero lot construction In the It 12 zone,plus a eduction in the garage in is zoned°R 7PD and R-12.Lo+rated at:.SW Hall Blvd and-SW Fantuo ek Drive (Wa.Co:Tax:Map 281412E 3,lots.100 101,4400,3101,x3790 4300). Publish February.9,1984. ....,. , .. .;', . 111 •. y PLACE !ENDER CITY OF TIGARD LOGO 4 PUBLIC HEARINGS j The following will be considered by the Tigard Planning Commission on February ' • 21, 1984, at 7:30 P.M. at Fowler Junior High School Lecture Room, 10865 SW r Walnut, Tigard, Oregon. Further information may be obtained from the Director of Planning and Development at 12755 SW Ash Ave. , Tigard, Oregon 97223 or by !` calling 639-4171. • Study session between Planning Commission and NPO's. VARIANCE V 1--84 BOND PARK II and BOND PARK III NPO # 5 A request by Waverly Construction Co. for a variance to city standards to allow sidewalks on only one side of the interior streets of Bond Park II and III. The applicant also requests a variance from the setback standards for an R-12 zone to allow 18 foot garage setbacks, 10 foot street side yards, 4 foot interior side yards, and 15 foot rear yards. The property is designated medium' density residential and is zoned R-12. ; Located at: Between SW 79th and SW 81st, north of Durham Road. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 12CC lots 100, 1900, 2000, and 2S1 12CD lot 1600) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD 1 -84 Rosebud Enterprises, Inc. NPO # 7 A request for conceptual plan approval for 34 single family zero, lot line • dwelling units on 7.31 acres. The property is designated Medium Density Residential and Open Space. It is zoned R-7PD. Located at: SW 106th Ave 1 and SW Black Diamond Way. (Wash. Co. Tax Map IS1 34AD lot 2600)• ' { PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD 3-84 1 SUBDVISION S 11-83 ZONE CHANGE ZC 2-84 4 VARIANCE V 6-83 Colony Creek Estates II, III, IV NPO # 4 1 A request by Titan Properties for a zone change from R-12 to R-12 Planned Development (PD) for a 2.49 acre parcel. Also, a request for a conceptual and detailed plan approval of a Planned Development as well as preliminary I `. plat approval on 15.27 acres. A variance to allow zero lot line 1, $ construction in the R-12 zone, plus a reduction in the garage setback from I, 20 to 18 feet. The property is designated medium density residential and is zoned R 7PD and R--12 Located at: SW Hall Blvd and SW Fanno Creek r Drive (Wa. Co Tax Map 2S1 12BB, lots 100, 101, 3400, 3601, 3700 and 4300). 1;u' TT publish 2-9-84 0288P I - is *r RECEIV D RYAN O'BRIEN JAN 1 6 1984 Planning Consultant OF TIGARO 1134 S.E. 23rd Ave. Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 • (503) 648-4061 Tigard Planning Commission January 13, 198A. :Variance Application for Bond Park No 2 and 3. Applicant: Ken Waymire of Waverly Construction Co. __. INTRODUCTION This application is intended to supplement the attached variance appli- cation. already submitted. There is some question in the way the Zoning Ordinance is written whether the standard variance procedure in Section 18. 134 or the subdivision variance procedure' in Section 18.160. 120 applies to this project. The attached variance report is for Section =-. 1 8. 134 of the Zoning Ordinance and the material in this report is in- tended to comply with Section 18. 160. 120 o f the Zoning Ordinance. We are covering both procedures in this case to be sure this application =.. - properly viewed. VARIANCE JUSTIFICATION Two of the findings required by Section 18. 160. 120 of the Zoning Ordinance are almost identical to Section 18. 134. They include "special circum- stances" and "detriments to ublic health, e tc. 1' However, 2 of the following findings are different and are addressed in this report. 1 . The variance is necessary for proper design or function of the subdivision. 2. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right because of an extra-ordinary hardship which would result from strict compliance with the regulations of this ordinance. COMMENT ON FINDING 1 P �.'•l_ This development is designed with 5, 000 square foot lots with 50 lot widths and 100 foot lot depths. These lot Sizes and dimensions are very common in other developments ents in the City and appears to be` the y p y pp �,. trend for the general area. The current side and rear yard set backs of the R-12 section of the Zoning Ordinance are too restrictive for the proper design and function of these subdivisions. These `'set backs proposed are identical to the set backs approved by the Planning Commission for Bond Park No. 1 . These proposed set backs are the mini- mum necessary to develop an adequate subdivision with efficient -use of land. Strict interpretation of the code would create unsightly narrow houses with large set backs. The negative effects of this strict } ' • Page 2 •Bond Park 2 &3 ' -Variance interpretation out weighs the positive effects of development designed G to be compatible with the lot sizes and the type of modern houses built on 5, 000 square foot lots. . • COMMENT ON FINDING 2 ;_ :; , The property right of developing 5, 000 square foot lots with adequate - set backs to fit the type of housing proposed will be utilized by the future owners of' the lots in Bond Park ,No. 1 and the property owners of R-7 land in the area. Strict interpretation of the code would add 20% '? to the price ce of f the proposed lots without any corresponding public • benefit. This unnecessary hardship can be eliminated b this variance p by request. The property right, in this case, allows` development up to • 4. 12 units per ..acre, however, only 7 units, per acre is proposed. Strict interpretation of the •code would only allow 5•, 5 units per acre. This smaller density is not in compliance with the- Comprehensi re Plan. .! Further, it unnecessarily restricts proper development of the property •� ' so that a reasonable density can not be ach-eived. Therefore, approval of these variance requests are in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and in the best interests of the City and Surrounding pro,paerty >)wners ., 4 • • 115' yan O' Brien .., r f 1: t r 1 , , , e I. . t k , b :' 1,s I� RYAN O B RI EN it Planning ConsuflanY t' 1134 S.E. 23rd Ave. e Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 0 (503) 648-4061 µ. i Bill I Monahan , Planning Di .rector January 10, 1984 , City of Tigard Subject : Sidewalk Variance for Bond Park No. 2 and 3. :s is Dear Bill , l t On behalf of Ken Waymi re, I am requesting consideration of a 1 '= modi fication of the sidewalk standards of the City of Tigard, Attached are the sidewalks routes that we desire. The main reason w .'', for th;,s request are -provide more l'an dscap i ng and to c- eate a more aesthetically pleasing environment. Sidewalks on one side softens 4 the harsh look of sidewalks, gutters , curbs, street I fights , and ` ma i I boxes, utility boxes, etc. To properly accomodate foot 1 traffic , sidewalks are not needed on both sides of the street. Many I', w. other developments in the City of Tigard have sidewalks on one side 1 ; t, only. A recent example is Pic ' s Landing. I f you would like to d scu:ss t'h i s issue further-, or i f you need I }r• more information or justification, please give me a call l C- I 1, • S ' n ce r-e l y , h= fe• / • • it, / it �e s iyan 0' Bri a, ' i i1, ' 4 i a. ,;:c • { FA,erpi / . , ''•'• itt,,.#A D poliai„1... MO. a + . , . ..: , .:., .,, y - 400 ' ; .. ;,:.,:, , . ///, / // 'J L 7 , / r ' • , ► P tTo"e L i ,f M:1 TL39oo / t: ° to 17 I kF56I aGE'o I / GA&E- P .._ _ o 1- i / \ 19 2 . 0 1 , 0 1o,� x i,r' _ yo c'o w ,' e Z `0, 2 I5 ti Y�L I s ao .r^ ...:•:.:. 7 1 °' I h 1 r;g 17 I Th3ao 93 a : ��.Ad ' • I 111..,...,,,,,,,:,...., 1 >� / F .,.. h , } - / ____,----,' 1 < 1 N. I I $s K • w: �M / /,/ I A 7 y 0o I .o i t ---''� 9 H. ". t / 5 �� t).9 ad t ( I c) ' .,,:•i:;$iz)4,__ 7 .-- . ; gri( ; ‘,....______ , . tss �, , --..,.....,„ \ ,,, _ 0 ZS \� � / a. 1 0.-'::., : N,\\,. _,-/ I / ►eo .fir/ -bA Sy ,' ! _` 9TAr t t0 29.,---,14,.:: ii,?1, 9 , rs �F� �'fi' Y �Crr^!.. aq k =..>,• , �y� T1L'U 40 95 ' ` .,a '4 tie i..: . - 4, ,i,„, ,,,. •ti ..........: . ,...,„. t,,,- . . c, 04 \, (7—i ' - . . le i„. l , ._; II „ • . . i :.:.::: ' \N' 11 '.. ..c.._= 1 . I I ',..(4..,,z.:`..ki 4 ". iloiliz ,,1,-4,1,,.; ,,cx , e CP RYt a f ifiuiM G R_1 _.f. € lraYuS w r `._2 ate. c .........:__..._. _ _____. . . .',•-... 111141. •'.i`,il I— ___/--•- . `�:4.2 'sc'� I.}o `'--� is 5 3 1111Y.,-,`t 54 5� 1 4 • -...�r--o i 50 50 0, Y s Zs ---� • ( --- T\ YL Z000 / r� T L. • t3 I ( O I Q I I I 7 1 i 14°:'Rt.R. 6086�� '13°'' / 1-44,i t2 1 II le 1 I I I —....--7----- ....••• ,/• \ / I'./s�r`t' G oTt'� f / ; ` . k.\ fiL 100o_ . -t$ye 1 �) / / 0 Itco 7sci40E.xxiL Bowan. I // /� / i.�j '3f I 3S I B 10ot }3 1 4.3 (.{� � f - _ •• 7 • CAP 4�i � � • 0 I / ` \ '��• r • ' W S1PE / . •• . ' ' ' . ' . ' r ..Jx. ",.,.00N.?..00..,.10 CLiAPPRINT PACR.DUT 4 • :.r•... .. , a r. :-- :: + .. :.. ..,. ...__. .. _.. , RYAN O'BRIEN Planning Consultant 1134 S.E. 23rd Ave. e Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 ® (503) 648-4061 Planning Director Review of January 9, 1984+ Variance App I ication for Bond Park No. 2 and 3. Applicant: Ken Waymire of Waverly Construction Co,; INTRODUCTION This application is a request to reduce the set backs of single family lots in the R- 12 zone, The required set backs of the R- 12 zone and the proposed set backs are as follows required set backs proposed set backs 20 feet - front yard 15 feet 20 feet distance to garage 20 feet s . .-ro 1Z 20 feet - street side yard 10 feet 10 feet - interior side yard 4 feet 2o feet - rear yard 15 feet • VARIANCE JUSTIFICATION 1 . The proposed variance wi l i not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Code, be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards; and to other properties- in the same zoning district or vicinity . 2. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar HH to the lot size or shape , topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control , and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; • 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this Code and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible, while permitting some economic use of the land; <. 4. Existing Physical and natural systems , such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the develop + ment were located as specified in the Code; and 5. The hardship is not 'self- imposed and the vari ahce requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship - Rage 2 y. COMMENT ON FINDING NO. i The intent of the set backs in the R- 12 zone are to properly separate muytiple family structures from adjacent properties and lower density zones. These set backs are not necessari' ly intended for single fami l y detached houses. .'.This fact is demonstrated by the following requirements of the 'R-4.5 and R-7 zones. These standards are significantly less • restrictive than the R- 12 zone. General l y the set "backlstandards in Zoning Ordinances become less res•tri cti ve in higher density zones. R-4. 5 Zone R-7 Zone 20 feet front yard 15 feet 15 feet street side Yard 10 feet 5- feet interior side yard 5 feet 20 feet distance to garage 20 feet 15 feet rear yard 15 feet The type of development proposed is almost identical to development °` permitted in the R-7 zone. At a minimum, the R-7 set backs ' should be permitted. The purpose of the R- 12 zone is to permit development of single family attached and detached houses. The allowance of this variance will not conflict with this purpose. These variances will not conflict with th'e policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The property is designated residential and all public facilities J. i are available. No new residential development has occured in the area to establish a development trend exc :pt Bond Park No. I which was • approved with almost the same type of set backs proposed with this • appl ication . Both Bond Park 2 and 3 were purchased by the applicant prior to adoption of the Zoning Ordinance and the current set back requirements . No impact to surrounding property will be created. No proposed develop- ment will be close or adjacent to existing houses . Further , these proposedset backs will not impact future development of adjacent property.' COMMENT` ON FINDING NO. 2 The special circumstances that exist on this property are the size and shape which have created the need for the lot sizes propoaed The lots are generally 50 feet in width and 100 feet in depth . They are speci f i - cal l y designed to accomodate 36 to 42 foot wide houses with 2 car garages. The other properties do not contain the small lots requested and do not' have the same circumstances or need for these requested variances . COMMENT ON FINDING NO. 3 '.:. n i The use will be single family detached house, a permitted use in the . R- 12 zone. All other requirements of the zone will be complied with. • Page 3 COMMENT ON FINDING NO. 4 There will not be any impact to public facilities or the environment. COMMENT ON FINDING NO.S The variance is not s e l f i reposed, as the property purchase, the s p e c i f i c size and shape of the property, and the trend of 5 ,000 square foot lots in the area occured prior to adoption of the Zoning Ordinance. Further, this variance is the minimum necessary to al l ev i ate the hardship of the code. • • r. y • ,l',''.. 1:.,... . , . ..,... ''.. ' ', . Pli?..- * ' ' .0.'0--i a)iNt S I T:)f---.1-e.4 \--------1 i-c) $Ikk‘t ( ...... I.::::. '', ri:7)le, / c" / 46:). - \ ....:',. . : ' ,. ..., , , ,,,/// TL13t ) g.,o,F,„it.-goz•ri / / ,. 1L-, ' 1 �'1_39P0 I I- zcd Imo, ,_Ni t -p 18 0 17 ;: lbte%.1tdCs6L o l f• / 1/4'\ ...1.... ,,,,./. ' 1 sfl :•,,,'. „3\ t,4'.,-. 2° ., il.''')° '!'• 75 ...',..'.. „ , ....,..„ -'. ....:',.... I � -\ . 6B is �., rLb4ao/ y� 21 R� DEI ESµ /7/ / TI 300 .: 4 / D1F-41t- --- ' '� 147 u '''''al...J ,......................") l f 17-s\ I 4 0 `a2 / T off P' {� �j/�!► ®ppa4 6g°i 4...3 :TT:; E;ic7 I �� f3S . ,1 •."' '•,. o_ 25 4 , ,... W ''. it-/Z. r pi.' r ..,.,.•..:,. li 1 ,:.:, . ... .,. -......,..,,,,.. . i ' : . ,..:::: 4. ze, 10 z,• x 4' �1 l :/ 27 'C':. ///(� rl. f ( ( 'I' 10 zQ ; arv..c't••••••::,1 ' N\ \,. '+ r-� /� I. 100 �y I.:: 1 2. y G 5J, j ' 7 1 i''':' ' ':'-. _/' I ,. i 0 ) ) 1 '.;.: ' -..-. ... . . .. ' - '' ---- .4 ...: .,.....,„I-. 'Be" . a to..,0 Lc:::::..I i-i-� '.j 7-; 0 37. izs ` 6..1_ -, i 1 ,o a=.ao Q-Z N • 8a POA.bE -�: 1 -ff : . 1 1 4 (`\15 bb tgt 4 ,5 co. /'' I ( 8 1 Za m°1`� p sip �' 4,c, I.}p� . ,.: . ----�-' °-- 1 + ZS 25 . \ 1 12 I II In 1 41 I I 60BLE./ ; r 1 . Fk>�,. - { � l2c�a �GOl"T'/• LjL4, i : I /\ / • : �'r��"t"L 13dc, .1�� Itoa r,GHDEwE ... ,, , /I ., 1 00 . \ ,/ - / EiT__rl.j ,... 1 f [fp / --'./ / ,,,#) ' --'\ ' `3B 59 SS 1i3-1 43 43 .li / VA -TE. n441 r t.1 / � �' '... ',. , i / \. r y,,...,.1,_NI ..: - ''''''.... . . ._..) ;.,. 4IP 151 . .iv ' 71:;11,—) • s t' ' Pi"-sg-k-c_. 2,._-. c. 3 ' ' ' ' . a 1v1tt ►11147'30 ON NC,10004.•10CLCAAPWNf11 PAO&,OUT , ' _ ,. ♦'• t b , _ N `,. y.r„ ;':.;a',,.,D 1,:-.' ft.,: " .;.�,w ..X r t e t w -,r,;: :1 t.i.. .h d �.,. .V• !"1:3:�,. _--,-..-., -____. „.;:„. ,. ,.� �,. i I::,,»r�-4 �is t -,f:: $ s*F..l�:,r -'t,r § ��K. �x r � a •� �4...,,- ,,,_ . :- . .. -GENEIAL'APPLICATION FORM !!�� . CITY OP TIGARD r 12755 SW Ash, PO Zax 23397 RECEIPT No•„° . , Tigard, 'Oregon 97223 -- (503)63c)-4 131 :, I. GENERAI; INFORMATION FOR STAFF USE O Y //PROPERTY ADDRESS Associated Cases: , LEGAL DESCRIPTION ..r PCY r 10t-t- O F . IOC 4 1_4 00 € � � 7S -- kZ INTERNAL PROCESSING: ® .'Accepted for 'rep-APP.. SITE SIZE v PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER ADDRESS U PrHONE 62.5°•7o z . � .�,.�.��. .�. Pre-App.: ,, • CIS $� D = ZIP 40 . Date & Time: APPLICANT* � � ( —F-- OF- •U -K-.�.` "1 . -c ADDRESS _ L - Acce ted fo Dec3.scicb ciT'Y zTP 6 722'3 ! S - E ' bJhere the, owner and the applicant are different people, the ;. . applicant must be the purchaser of record or a le asee in PP P �iea�c�.ag ;Date. possession with written authorization from the owner or an .• 4 agent of the owner with written authorization. The written °�°.�. Rea.r ng ,Reset Tod authorization must be submitted with this applicati.. • 20 REQUIRED LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION IS ATTACHED =,YES NO , ci T n• filetl..:S� ffiailed ' 3 THIS APPLICATION INVOLVES THE FOLLOWING: APP. FEE FILED PAID c . r .. . p te ' o r:;A...p. e E . Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1e1 < t9-, . - , from o • -' quasi--judicaal .. d legislative x Date of Reiringe Zone Change from to ,> � qua: -audicial legislative PESCR ION:- w,:'; „ . IPT �:Comp. Plan ei nation. Planned Unit Development . .. . P • concept plan detailed plan 1-5\�. • 3," • Subdivision t,,,,, :r,., .. ssgi No.e. F Mao @ 4{'" ____i Major Partition , • ' ; u 'f 'Minor Partition i s�� K �t Z AI1 3.�1 g D� � • •.' • - ...... .. ... ...... `... ... . .. ... i• 1 mod! Conditional Use _ 11 Zon ng Yap Nof. F�� , r�r . . '' ): {fir.., =.�. . ` �ariarice to Zoning Ordinance : ' (Title 18) Quarter,,Section No.,.. .,,,-.: - ., , .. •.,Variance to Subdivision Ord ..,�0 ,, 1 ,, � f (Title 17) Permit ,H l , ; C Sensitive Land qA NOTES: { } k � " , ' Floodplains Drainageways .:^ .. ,..,-r1.,.,,,.+.-„,, ,« tee p S lope . ct e, Other y •j S 'c r 1111111111111.1 ., • t ! ,s t GENERAL* ENER APPLICATION FORM --��r�'Pk E:;'-3 ,- CASE'+ tai▪ a v.__ ._' ,{ • 31 k .. . .. . �C ilt�s.; f. t (:4'FPto `h 1CITY OF TIGARD� 12755 SW Ash, PO Box e 3397 ' f R lx r A. � Lt x; ;,.y F Tigard Oregon 97223 - (503)639-4 173,, d {, , , 9 d CHANGES IN THE CHARACTER OF- TUE.-AREA WHICH AFFECT THIS APPLICATION.' Please'▪-Discuss: - A °:• ; ..'..;`,,,,,-.),,ii.+ . V�3 4t Y ,I i r t r, i•1• V l 1, 3t. . . 1 3/471/4.1_, f412---..r_-1=Ar I ' c., rat 6-I & " —c: t , c.-).cc... .."cT.1,„r ,,,:.� _� >r f ".,.,,rte , , 1,\kr,.._1,4,. i, ' ''''''‘..;C)'"IC-- 'ait'TZ )I:) 0 ‘C-- (.0 r''''.\,. ‘ t4'*- -Ps-C-C---c.-)k(—0 A C., .....i. ,,,,,,:,;. (ftk.)t. • G- °-0,k 4c‘ - € r'<),-,. c).2. - kO° a - `3�t- .�- ` .cam _ {/.., ,_ ,,, "r. 1 +`•;, Th c ft_s �i •9 :r-•�A•i' i l.t1,,,;" ' ;, Y. -,1:,i', i t `t n• , Sx I• 1{• -, "l o;,4 F -if ,�-r'7-Jed" /-71,4)0E �' :x ►` T?' + >6&&/`T '" OP - " C "" /� ,, 1, .. . y 10. {DESCRIPTION OF T hE SITE . . l•. Fi�i�i-s't 1,!......',...;°;,.'t4,....i.♦ ,:',.1.i'...• w . is :34. c' y { ` x.>, ,Y1 i l'.Lot Area (acres square feet) ,„ ., , n 11® EXISTING STRUCTURES ON THE SITE F' ' i Square P st e From ®•crt Line . . Use Feet : No dh South 4} , East _ if sL., r • Lj; 1 , • x j '4,'''''. j t ,t,♦ rr J- ,,,,., , r off: >t t t 2.4- �),t+ 4 ,f , ` NATDR>AL CONDITIONS z• `,r ,- , I. fl c) ;,,I r 12o Percent 51®pe: i .� • Ave rage Die=sex ,;P rceIIt as;, � `R,,: ,. ,.1 .,. 13 V�Ee t�t��a Type Yes No Size Of Treee jS Per S ze''Y,l a, ";.1,. ,t, 't B{v �}�? j^y�rb Trees: -- 6 ▪ .,. , „ ::,,,,,,,.:,,,,;,..,,j,,,,,,;,.. _ 1 ��{ . w . , c Brush• , tr ,." v4r,L�;�� . , Brush: x • ` r Gras.3° ! ' t , 7; ,If,- ",,r,,1. 1 "f„� ,, j =4tif., ,1,7' " rk • e� f ) .i ~ • .1<,V , �i,rjA i! LlS �i.��%��'i y W .� Rc4w much of the site �i2 in 'floodp41.n,.4,` {} „3,M, 1 lei Fcx�dp "p .` .• ��1 Li ii 1 o,...�_..r..�, , ' 'y ' Y y 1ry}It � : {}C,r..}. • s�,lY.Y r ' ) Courses What type: . - ,,� f ,...,-, ,,,„,,,f,�i` 15 Water C p`y�, ' x • ,}is ` L 16,, Rock Outcroppings { ;(,.1 k �' ,, tr zr, 1"', yy t 1L 7 e x • r r li,.i` p! ,,.;tom¢ ,- v f t Getter � • 1S. P d Develop nt: Please briefly describe the proposed ,d,evelopsaeit• •. ,,, i.53• f a • 0� 7"-3 1 /VP 0 -cam , 't, 1L; ;l.tr ,dx ;;.4'. W,. ..-"' * pp9�®app gp�q p�y� ;�s� ,J • •/ ; T . ' t"h `� ��`• 'UD iZ►6fb,A^ lY�t64��"Y't� •'1 ` I� APPII�A.'�I(3 -� & )A ` {Y �` r • •+,' - . ,--•,. ..-.,,!/.,.-.. ,•. , . ,.} t.., +.! cr... 1' I yt�' ; 1,y Gi° ' LARD, I2755 SW A.eh 'O Elc f 2339 �: sY. , ' ;,,� , '�;r l•*i ► ' • �i and Ore Oregon 97223 (503)639417,14-2. A.,," ,-- ,a:,� �t } i1:'-, �t;, s ;•,' .• �� rr�• 1✓is# w re qu, ....,o* tiiy 4 t ,tr• ``�fi4 * 1 ' • e 0 e r /. 9�t �F ...I. 1.tv" n"w i. i t[1.' xr4.tl�., + `,.. 19'e ` The fo11t �.ng LS a -s not ' .;°.1q,',4:1, , r,.,,�4J a1 .a 1 * iw� t ;.11z'c F{ tt ' )f G', ., f1• , , 2 3. '' tvi;rall Site <�e�ielopu nt ''St''t ''- , 1 r 1 kkI'I ` ‘`..i...x t t:'.eta . `'�.° •y �. , arciel Indus r�s f, S.ace -,'Ohe �` 'Rondo:::::s_24-7,0,,,t.a.1.*::.4 j- u„., .�. Res.... �.a 1. � ,, yy��.yy `No®' of acres :-• ,,,1 5`25'• ;),., ,� or quare /9� 0 0 E. ' ;-A � 'l--- er mie e 1-c6,;.S-, ' III• .' '.::‘..Pereent of , j20c5 ----1690'7' ' --"‘a - .-:.— .4..._-_-•- ''-‘ za., i,.,. .„06, . ....; _ . . = ..,- .- - 67., ,. , , a . . , - site sea.- FT.• . -,,,,...• e ove r a _.' j a t.y} i J - ' 1 t 21® ir e ®f Resideaatilel Use and Charac ter-LstLcs •r ,.'sl ,,< 1� xl. :,st.,;:r >• 4: ., '' i of (roan IUnbt ?,.,,4).:e ,4tte: ;Y,tt i ,,1•- . ®f i)s�; # of Units #r. Pro,oSed tDcn,sit ''‘ y p ap, ..: ........ .. t • b Y.. r t• 4 y i ip ica lk 1 r A.�'�r7t`+� ?��+r 3ttN�n(�"".{� �«,K ♦ e , MAY . � �• f , f ,. , .. ® �� ^ F� �orb Ty. i"� a °� lease ex slain how the caper apace 0.'49.11F,.' ..'4 r are i �ecreati®anal. x ;t f.w 62! � it a ~L J t"+w+,M �..,:.,�( ,H t tT, t#,':t« wY•L `r , , Where applisab le,,, P ' f aci1i.t es will tae Intai•ned. t� .t,,`+ • 4,:,,I.':•-,,..,t. .,•,e! ,?t r+h St 1K'a .. r iT to�yr?;N t�+� (1�«y"�r.iTt 1L£�� s�y(' Ay ,� N y ' �f;4:01.1 r:,,,AlJa` °,C,i^$. jr,ax54e.tr C4+d r i•,.yY, i Y d'A�.�'; � , "'.�'�I gTSFvi J��4r.pypf'M+i7 Cdr�l��ty(�r t'h'j�r�4 i'r�b,`�• '! `. " '� , t�ti' ..-.. a r�{:,77 s.rjiily ; 1� ��,i rT" '. . e;,, tr i •A a ti. -a:'.i/1-,11,.. .^4,]t! i.1`•� t t111-'.•r.� yi„ Ab iaC�/ �j 1rfo,,,,'r `f}"IS IPfit+f aZ." . . , . : :.,.. , .r x «,+3 eti'f• }. . •T1 1r,} ,pi.;;t,},r,.xry,• ';Y"'. �f Rt' • ' ,- .-,,,;,,,„, . ..:„:,..,,...,.:: ..'i...,;...,‘,,:it::,... ', ' . , ,.„. .♦ :{.,r1Yy^H•R^ �., 7 1 1 l.,,.4' .r. I. ,c- , .. •y, qs . ..r L ,/,. •4z r r ,}" .1t �i,111,�41ipi= ,r e.'.".. ♦ , ,,„,,;, 4,,,,.,.„ 4 f 141, ,. t' 1 f A• r y, ;.,. ,4. ,41...1,.., / •�Y . • 'if,',,;, 'M. Yµ. 4'. i ?I l i _ ease describe eacnbese' ® ,\ he ,PFD, tt,{ti , ' 23. If the project is to be completed in phases, please t ' /•"' Vim•- 7 /••� c7 V i- h ,!1 , `•` • „S� "--.....;.'•[ •,,`�, L•. . l `, ''tin �, n . .....pp.-,-i i 't', 0 e 1 '•a;k•t, i It i'Yt ' R• - L -. -.. o'. '' ff��i�.../""'.-. p '?°f`rY4.j.� yz b?t`r, ,` '1'si� ,fl, S.,Z,F 1' Yt.l` / 12/, ` tl �-yy I ...�` A•Y .t"�`[•f e��){ !tC ] ` �y c-,4:1„,,'‘ ..,Jty'� ;,. � a " f ,a-i : • . p ..., , „; v= Y# t; ,..,49.:)..., ,,,,. . ,- - --:' 50 0 c i i 0 ""7 V G9r F✓ ktis`�� 1 .'f,-�,+��r� R-gi'' 1'1><V',r .� ° • • ° ° o *i ly�a�w{, •t�IC�a,,,}t•'° f, 5��t.•t�L'°.'. q .s¢ submit the following with this apPlacBtao€�. �, t ' , :.,,ii.: ,4. , ,. �4 µ�.. �:,`•; Please x :::::,;::'$. ° / ( r "r,., '':�, '�Y i t� �I sl y cif ','. 1 Written General Narrative, number as required by .Planning.D�pag x�, ,i;L:' ,,, ## t, *v.,, - 2. Proof of Ownership `' : .';1t�''tili.t " s''1's��,'4, �. 3! Letter of authorization if applicant is not owner. , L,, ,e,!4.:.a `1k .¢ ,�'b, . ,y y z+ y`1 „r,s „ ft• t b ,, # 1' '!,1 l'fl'i4i f a r ^ a' 4 6--- } + 4 I Y l t 4 " • this section is to be comp feted! .0 ,'� En�1f,� 4et �. Staff w�11 identify for You whethex the c P ,` . ;� '4 ' ''� :� ;` r.,°.� - , •r: k,ex.;=: .""u::1C 4.Y»'k�>:'iZ I Y l:`5^3L^.1 MA 4+X^SEC• • .ter...... .. .... .,_....: ..--na.».._..,. ._,.r a..»_.n... ...,....... _..•.....a.. -. .,.._., ,. ... GtOE I APPLICATION FOR i PAaL 5 = �') .CASE No. • a-: o. .�mw •,�%,,j f t�7.'��r 4a�.� 'fJ1» J r {.� »•°�! �';. CI'T'Y OF 'TIGARD, 12755 SW Ash,, PO E 23397 t . R . :'' ' ;'. Tigard and €ire on 97223 — (503)6t39--4 774,,ti a', . - ^;,, J.t,4,rfti*r a• t .. -1.,i Yt�'TKY,,d4f iFa ,{ad,p,.lrµ'v+ f,'*':,,,, 1 • • „ i d�lF ',b 1.ti 1 ,r. l r +1, ,` 2 . LL.OWING PEOPLE, AS R UEST P'0X,.THE,APPLICANT, S Ear NQTIFI ,,'!OF AC# }1 A&RI�3O, i ��ny ppyy e��,i0.gg ��f�/�y �p �i q�9 7th®F• i''1k s•.r,• . 'r. .,, r ..t -4r4 1M • .54t,cr i' . # ,^,'fr 1, to�Ome ral.*.4 vre o En Lneer)r{'�•t e . i 'j,♦f ♦fir- 4 r , • r ' T •.,.... s �Jc aaal •:,.k:‘,: ,r' ' ` rw', • •!t •� ' t ': ,'i !, -F . :. t� ;tx Re,or t,' )d x!!, . . ��s1.:�,r �t� Cat a 7.��.®fir' �'R��! .. e r. a ,,,,,.-•,-..... 1.::. Street / )16 r a r x•� t+l�. iefa ,A4-ifiC i .;.. ! i; ,~ F la ' • ,{/; 1' n , ti Y r a i,i t r .+:. t,3 i.4.) M • --(i4-6- ?c....:,,;.'1;1§:,. d ; _: .,' .I ...x • tx" o.. .. r q:,fly L Y L,Y �ats e. `i { .‘,,••...t-,,„._..s.,-.•,..,r,, ! !a, . o. ° s,c �' A' , st ' .. y .Ft . }.��.i a ''A. Ii1Y •• , s � a . , "ts/-,f w J,Ny itI • -3. r{ 1 d , �;1 ° ! 34e l d J f;,..0,,`,v 3 i3t i Streit. . .. a [, • , x' Y:d ! } t J .. ti....lii •✓ f �• +r 1N:� �ti. T J . )f!!xt i :':?;`,+,.1„;:.,,;, ...... 1 i .' ' ea v . . 0 zr y 1' 4 n #:+ "•Ca t-.• v• _�.� . :Y� Stote Ex • /Z 1.-.- ' �ti r .i ilk • '+� t A' t � i� —.A0 M ./� rp ;' e�, °n�� • X-L�.£ p. :,,'...77:4:,:f...:4.-.......e •S 41. 'T�l�' �k{ 1...",:j.; s •rJ ,E /...LA -00 y 4 ft, a f. �„��• � .� . R .. X _�iyd ! S r . e�.t F 'ti•�i' r � r. am.w+a..,. ,.�... •.s..� .. _ ) k ?;.;.t ',t4 lT`+ 4th!4 t'�'i- .1 (� �++g @.. �'eAd19'nr�SAu{l,•.�.c^.. /�WJ•� '`� '•: Sheet •Y6! ,..suer 0� ��° " C •. jY,}• , . i��+if 1,ayf � { it State '• Zi. •7/4-6 "> +,; ,,.-,▪r} r 3tt4,., f ' '• " i ! � .t1 '71.'41.;','''''',5.',.1,'.:`-';.,/,;� Y 8' r i}�! ��,ft Ji x •�, -5 , a e +•` g q�q ' r=, . ;x17It',"-•rf gi-,, 4 sp „t j2x'+i) `0.,ti�F ,^k, K ;C- A�PLICG'7I F,, 1 { a'∎11 bl a%+r.i� ,/ '•+.fi x i, �tt ti r {' Yf. ttfii i t!; ,4 r '∎,1 ix �,ii.y1' $aryaY. • ,, , , K:i.; i '.,;', j'•,T• ri,1,.• ', i '',1, t tlt1NER L! 0 �• V //Y _. , - • : .,,! 't t i.„: 'a!, *,...4 F".ld .• , 'y �'. % • 'Y•*4�./&° r�44y:N.a74+'1;_''''',16)..,'•1 :lv , l Y,. , t :.:,:•,,, 1 'f2,,, et:41,! r 1 y; . . ~ f� sY�� V V. / T....�” : [ q9 of ti x , �;;• i #t';.{r?.,):�4t,14%']tys r7i1.JV;; !,.. . .. .. ;„i.;..,';;;,-:, s�t ,py�; t r}f t f+.y,�1j� I+7,a��Hlti "h r• . y .• • S� �..r_ �•( 1w, +,JJ ti C t ;�i�}•-ti•��Z �j�, ,b xh : S°:•�• •tJ :• ••• moo„ '- F ' A^� } 'i(,• ..F Y,+} •x.. 0 iiT ,..! �i ••, r1 r' 1 ,,,,„i,.. ,.M•4r V::, A2- }"=:. i • Y.• v.. ,1 i`1 4., J ,qtr F.. 1,, .... ..."'''. . .- e . S S� 1'� f! r),r F i.. . . ..,. , ,. 0 f(::. ...-....)._ - . - . , -.'4 Ae ' ': P.:. ' l't,:'--. • ( "")11 ( -i/9-(2.-io e)(12.--. ?.. • qer, )(r/ t . . / ,,...,' rr-i! '1, rj iI 4)f ,•s .l.,;,6L�rt,,,I;lel,Ar,vil:,,F`e�t.cGCi ,lei.. • aG 1 , x• t 3y J r-t, ,.., 7 4(.{, F� .41;,i”)1t„'°I ,r 1 ,, S .! 6 pvY }6 M J'A}1T! t, I. r .�,x ,J!r11:'�}1 +� *:' 1. .'y tf tr, t+f•, I. t '3�t ..a'S"'Ya •,� , + rlk 1 mow ( .. ? 1J-'�i) .,.?' } h;. -1,5.�T�f„` 1 t.41 s 1;1- +'+'}t ” _. I J►"' iJ I r.„ d f`i.aJ� i r,`',�,^'++ ;rIg�1!' aF�'1 of M..- '11 J �t xi r}, i I r +� ,j 4.,,.#• f .,+� ,.1+ rt*};Ira it+d,;:,• thlf!!!•0! x,`'.• ' 1 irtt.u!yry'd e,r. FY {.'r't ' 'r.k?':i ,t i 1.. ♦ '2,''y1,vd`. .t aw. .'t. ��7 J;. ,' �. r�„il+Fl��1F�11� � .•i �rk▪ 'C � �� V �' Mme" d✓'�./ R.�+� �y.» i '' ,.• ,i 2 � Rr,,,,,,:.. �' ' V ,.11.1". aM 11'r j r prig$ r r 414 1 t 'r" ..,,. f,.Y 44/10 el S. •/ 1) 6- 1�. 4 -i.' -,j441-1 (t 4' t�arTi ry,�fl r1 1 f * i1 'ira .1 '4 . Y .''.." 9-7 L7,.i".1q(2Q, y�J 'Ir,i� ,.,t;�� ,,� ��`� r r� ,lit. / ,.,' '�l ,'� ''� ! ii r#'j t:,�h1� 1.'}� ' ! Y�J�r,Y• �' fr . - ., � v t� ,r',a�'' - +±i! i��'t7 vY a t4 �r rr ►yir'j rt 4 �,� �, 1 i Jr j :l.,:ff r1t.l);`t,t ..AY¢1 .1 t, . s 1 � R1 4 +.?ft?1;11V';,,.,` ;"1' 'St+ rs ,u1. S,' "1`.r i"-.1,,,',t t•,= h t.#.l}CM11▪ +,",� i• • rr"" 101185 SW Riverwood Avenue 8065 SW Durham Rd. T 9600 SW Capitol Hwy. 11150 Tigard Oregon 97223 1 Tigard, Oregon 97223 t Portland, Oregon 97219 Harris-°McMonigal Marion Goble Driesner 8905 SW Commercial 8025 SW Durham Rd. ' Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Ryan O?Brien h Harold Hamback Robert Driesner 1134 SE 23rd Avenue 7735 SW Durham Rd. 15685 SW 79th Avenue Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 r . • George & Barbara Koch Dele Schoewe Frank & Erika Raab 400 E. Division St. 7925 SW Durham Rd. 15630 SW 79th Sherwood, Oregon 97140 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 • Edward & 'Viola Cotter ! G. Ray Scott Edward Killian Sattler 8800 SW Sattler Dr.. 8065 SW Durham Rd. 1 7975 SW Durham Rd. Tigard, St l 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 1 g , Oregon Marion, Goble William & Aria Scott Edward & Ann Messinger TS 8025 SW Durham Rd. 9255 S Inez 1 15565 SW 79th 1; Tigard, Oregon 97223 1 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 • Debra Naubert Conrad & Ethelyn Sproul ;` Frank & Rebecca Earhart 14365 SW 80th Place 15880 SW 79th jj 1 15545 SW 79th Tigard, Oregon 97223 tigard, Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - Arnold Michaelson E Thomas Stanton- Eu g ene Thurstonson P.O Box 256 i 15740 SW 79th 15385 SW 79th Avenue Sherwood, Oregon 97140 Tigard, Oregon 97223 j Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dorothy Gage Frances Tousey 8000 SW 54th Avenue 14660 .SW 89th Portland, Oregon 97219 1 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Ralph Diehl , Thomas & Lethe Stanton 8340 SW Dorburn Place ; 9255 SW Inez Tigard,' Oregon 97223 Tigard, Oregon 97223 • Bertina Sawyer Frank Erika. Raab P.O. Box 938 15630 SW 79th Beaverton, Oregon 97075 Tigard,, Oregon 97223 : _, d