Loading...
MIS1996-00006 • S • NOTICE':OF-:DECISION; .....::. . . ... ... . . .......:. LOT:LINE::ADJUSTMENT::::(MIS : 96=0006 ::: RENAISSANCE SUMMIT SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: RENAISSANCE SUMMIT Lot Line Adjustment MIS 96-0006 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested a lot line adjustment between Lots 11 and 12 of the Renaissance Summit Subdivision. APPLICANT: Renaissance Custom Homes OWNER: Same 1672 SW Willamette Drive West Linn, OR 97068 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential (1-5 dwelling units per acre). ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3.5 Single Family Residential. LOCATION: 10572 and 10554 SW Naeve Street; WCTM 2S110DA, TAX LOT 2000 and 2100. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.48 and 18.162. SECTION II: DECISION: Notice.is hereby given that the:City of Tigard Community:Development:Director's>designee. has APPROVED the above request subject.to;conditions of conditions:: :. The findings and`conclusions:on which the:decision is based are noted in Section IV NOTICE OF DECISION MIS 96-0006-RENAISSANCE SUMMIT Page 1 S • --may CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO RECORDING THE LOT LINE:ADJUSTMENT,THE FOLLOWING CONDITION::SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY.SECURED :. (Unless otherwise noted the staff-contact is-John Hadle • °:Engineering Department(503)639-41:71.). 1. A lot line adjustment survey map and legal descriptions showing the existing and proposed lot lines shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. The survey map shall include all access and utility easements. THIS:APPROVAL::SHALL BE.VALID FOR 18'MONTHS:: : .: • ;FROM THEEFFECTIVE DATE.OF THIS DECISION: SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The area has been designated for Low Density Residential use since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1983. The affected parcels were created as a part of the Renaissance Summit Subdivision that was approved in 1994. Vicinity Information: The affected properties are adjoined by other parcels in this developing subdivision to the north and west. The properties are adjoined by the Summerfield Development to the south and east. Site Information and Proposal Description: One of the properties is presently vacant, the other is being developed. The lot line adjustment involves a 1,400 square foot area where additional land area is to be added to Lot 11 from Lot 12. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Lot Line Adjustment - Approval Standards: Section 18.162.060 contains the following standards for approval of a lot line adjustment request: 1. An additional parcel is not created by the Lot Line Adjustment, and the existing parcel reduced in size by the adjustment is not reduced below the minimum lot size established by the zoning district; NOTICE OF DECISION MIS 96-0006-RENAISSANCE SUMMIT Page 2 3. • • 2. By reducing the lot size, the lot or structure(s) on the lot will not be in violation of the site development or zoning district regulations for that district; and 3. The resulting parcels are in conformity with the dimensional standards of the zoning district The proposed lot line adjustment is consistent with these standards. The proposed adjustment will reconfigure the lot lines but no additional parcel will be created by the adjustment. Because the subdivision was developed as a Planned Development, no minimum lot size applies to these properties. The 65-foot average width standard also does not apply. All existing and future site improvements comply with the setback requirements of the zoning district. Special Provisions for Lots Created Through Partition Process: Section 18.162.060 states that in addition to meeting the above standards, a Lot Line Adjustment must also meet the following criteria applicable to lots created through the Minor Land Partition process: 1. Lot Width: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district 2. Lot Area: The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. 3. Lot Frontage: Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet, or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement 4. Setbacks: Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district 5. Front Yard Determination for Flag Lot: When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. 6. Screening on Flag Lots: A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.100.080 and 18.100.090. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development 7. Fire Protection: The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire fighting capabilities. NOTICE OF DECISION MIS 96-0006-RENAISSANCE SUMMIT Page 3 • • R 8. Reciprocal Easements: Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one (1) lot, a reciprocal easement that will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. 9. Accessway: Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.108; Access, Egress, and Circulation. 10. Floodplain;. Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. Criteria 1 is not applicable because no average lot width is required to be maintained within a Planned Development project. Criteria 2 is not applicable because no average lot width is required to be maintained within a Planned development project. Criteria 3 is satisfied as the lots would have a minimum of 25 feet of frontage on SW Naeve Street. Criteria 4 will be addressed because the existing residence complies with the setback standards of the R-3.5 Zoning District. The proposed development on Lot 11 also continues to comply with the setback requirements of the R-3.5 Zoning District. Criteria 5 and 6 are not applicable as these lots are not flag lots. Fire hydrants shall be consistent with Uniform Fire Code standards, thereby, satisfying Criteria 7. Criteria 8 is not applicable as these lots do not share a common driveway. Criteria 9 will be satisfied through the future development of these lots. Criteria 10 is not applicable as neither parcel is within the floodplain. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering Department and Building Division have reviewed the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. The Engineering Department will complete a detailed review of the submitted Lot Line Adjustment survey map and legal descriptions prior to recording of the Lot Line Adjustment. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS Service providing utilities will have the opportunity to review the proposal and decision within the 10 day appeal period and may request reconsideration of the decision if it may adversely affect the utility's or fire district's abilities to provide service to the subject properties or the neighboring properties. NOTICE OF DECISION MIS 96-0006-RENAISSANCE SUMMIT Page 4 • SECTION VII: PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: ;` :::<;UNLESSAN:APPEAL':IS FILED: Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE.DEADLINE FOR FILING;OFAN;APPEAL:IS>330: PM ON MAY 28;_:1:996:: Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. May 17. 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner .Z LE..) Ma y 17. 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdo DATE Planning Manag6r 1:1CURPLMPATTYMIS-DEC.DOT NOTICE OF DECISION MIS 96-0006-RENAISSANCE SUMMIT Page 5 c 4! / ., 1 `•s• 1— ?s IC a w In 11,1 4.- r.Qs* ,,,le�� 5 0 / R AO S- ,2ti,330 • N \ 9e.$. PMOP051;7) MOT FOLIO AO.UStED IlK NOT SET a• 10 d.I. �° Lot 11 Q.� "�'...""�' Lot 12 • m• AREA_tam u. N a (3 ..- 1 93.2T *SI 16A ( 16h S O M M E R F I E L D N O. 4 O 1 tt� 0 PLOT PLAN CASE NO. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1 EXHIBIT MAP T MIS 96-0006 ( I -, e_41 p„i • Iipl/11 // 111/11 ! , . ,_\81,,1 I al i 1 =Li NM 111/"" m L illEl��i VII 111111 1 - Ha° III I... , .. I CO ai 71 III: In - -- I —S.W. NEAVE STREET H El P ' LS---» \U/ milk' •R �� c� . Emans 5" IIII.w 4111! /1"1111111111111 ti ill !-0:: : -400w w I V k .. ' C 0 ,iew .401 c.: PF 1 CM ■ 111..110,....0r11% sutftlegf's)cg DR 1 Wit"S‘t, 45 , # A Ilk .. ,, e,o■ % V 1'k ■ ..-1=?? :1)41)fr (..) .q). i . : g). ■ _ pullopm.._ .* _e. -., ts:s ,,,,s 4metvi . a Vicinity Map A MIS 96-0006 Note: Map is not to scale Renaissance Summit N LOT =Ng atuosmckm ' APPLZ IND OP TIGARD, 13125 `SGT.Hall' - FOR STAFF USE ONLY -- Tigcrd, Oregon- 97223 - (503)-639-4272`- ----' ---, casE No. C> 1.1. GENERAL INFORMATION OTHER CASE NO'S • _ • RECEIPT NO. q(-P-- -4.-41 O Z� PARC3L 1 -- -- -- - -- --- -- -- • - . 'APPLICATION ACCEPTED -BY: '•PROPERTY ADDRESS (05?2, SvJ 142eve, ° - , DATE: C?a;'6� TAX MAP AND LOT NO. 511 0 bA - 029 00 • . . . . �- - Applic elements submitted: PROP tTY OWNERS narssay.re DetreI.ormec&4 C cperr Nc/,:� - - --.... .. .__. ADDRESS floiz. Su) W� 1 ie4 Fans 1 (a) Application fora (1) PHONE���ss� gpoo --v� --. -• - CITY (,4jes� I,.i�.ti (8) Owner's signatures / ZZP c7Olo2 1,,,,..,__written authorization PARCEL 2 (C) Title transfer .instant PROPERTY ADDRESS (OSSA Ste' Octe v'� S#- •' (1) . .... . _ TAX HAP AND LOT NO. 2.5 1 I O17A - 02100 k 1 (Dom) Assessor's map (1) t (E) Preliminary Map PROPERTY OWNERS RO-Y1O.JSSCtvlCe C •SIvW, n-arneS - C ( 6 copies) ADDRESS 1672. Su) Wi IIQme- e'Fansb.rpgoNS (5-03)S53-$DOo • CITY - • t/ (G) Filing fee ($'SO) APPLICANTII/AGENT RtmissoAnce_ Deur-(or-navIt dra.fiO4 / Pavidy S�(oasFia DATE DETZRH NED O E COMPLETE: ADDRESS )472 Sw up■Uavne�°e Palls f)v PHON3 3)SS7 Soo 0 5 /S � L 4g/ CITY c't�O(o$ ?ZYaI. DECISION DEADLINE: 7/l2 lI When the owner and the applicant are different CCM?. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION: the applicant must be the _urchaser of record �(�Cc��/ie/Lr te4Q- �� or a lease Ln possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent cf the owner with w- -er. . . . . . SWIM' G authorization. The cwrer(s) must sign this application in the space provided cn =age twc or Planning Director Approval Daze suhmit a written authorization with this aoplicat_:n. PROPOSAL SL':4LARY The owners of record of the sub=ect orope:-v Final App-oval Date: equest permission. to adjust -c:.. - - _ ( :er) Planning: pa_oe_s of 341:7t and 99115 • Engineering: (acreage cr square footage) into a- parcels of 451 and I ■33-z. . Date Recorded and Number: (nu-._her) (acreage or square footage) 'bkm/ Y=:AD.i.;.JPF .4) 3. List any variance, conditional uses, or other land use actions to be considered as part part-ot-this-application: • - - _ S. Applicants: " To' have a -com_plets application you will need to submit attachments described_described_in_the attached information sheet at the time you submit .this - -- application: - -' - - 5. TES APPLICANT(S) SHALL CZRTIPY TEAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subtect property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted •in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • C. All ' of the `above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibit transmitted— herewith,-"are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, - based . on - this application, may be revoked -it it •is found that any such statements-are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. - DATED this 6+". day of MQ/ l9c1(o SIGNATURES of each owner (eq. husband and wife) of the subject pr _ rty. • • • • • • - - - -- Y U 1 i — I (U Pi I Y I)! I I:I-. '1515 .; it Hiiie fit 1 I , 1;15 5 HuNL55.55 HOIIUNi SW WICAANLIIE 1-OLL ; .t)k v Ni- IT WI-. , I .INN 1m PHyMFN, HMoONI 1-q-110 1..q.Wl.1K74 01- 1-( i IKNI NiA1HNI PHio _ _ . .... UNO OPPL 4.0t;Te.f. SW NAEVF./10554 SW NALVE 110141 . ONOUNT — — —> 1-40. 00 • • • Centerline Concepts, Inc_ April 2, 1996 Renaissance TRACT I A tract of land in Lot 11, Renaissance Summit, in the S.E. 1/4 of Section 10, T.2S., R.1W., W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the N.W. corner of said Lot 11, said corner lying on the southerly right of way line of S.W. Naeve Street; thence S09°29'58"E 113.12 feet on the west line of said Lot 11 to the S.W. corner thereof; thence N89°52'41"E 67.01 feet on the south line of said Lot it to the S.E. corner thereof; thence N00°09'13"W 48.57 feet on the east line of said Lot 11 to an angle point; thence, leaving said east line, N24°31'19"W 38.07 feet to an angle point; thence N49°33'20"W 63.78 feet to the N.E. corner of said Lot 11 and the aforementioned right of way line and a 125.00 foot radius curve to the right; thence, on said right of way line and said curve, through a central angle of 11°27'33" (which chord bears S58°11'44"W 24.96 feet) an arc distance of 25.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said tract contains 7,546 square feet more or less. Subject to easements of record. Precise Boundary Surveys 640 82nd Drive Gladstone,Oregon 97027 503 650-0188 fax 503 650-0189 ' • • .44:44.'t. City of Tigard,Oregon : AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (check box above,if applicable) (check appropriate box below) (Enter Public Hearing Date above) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director O Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) DECISION FOR: (Cheek box above.If applicable) City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) FINAL ORDER FOR: (cheek box above,it applicable) (check appropriate box below) O City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard Hearings Officer o Tigard City Council ❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", wailed to eac n d person(s) at the address(s) shown on the atta ed li.t(s), marked Exhibit"B",14.the • y •f �� 199 (( , and deposited in the Unit=d States Mail on the �� •ay of �� 199 ‘', postage prepaid. i ,. d &' I� 1 ill 2 / Pr-ared Notice WWI 4 Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the / scr an day of de Mer , 195 �'�,. OFFICIAL SEAL DIANE M JELDERKS /t(-/�� � NOTARY PUBLIC•OREGON I, //,�_ fAi►� ���.,� COMMISSIO 0(0.046142 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES S PTEMBER 07,1999 NOTARY PUBLIC ( �a REG N \ '..t + My Commission Ex. res: 9' 9 r, G1FILE INFO.:r7 7 NAME(s): f�,�n f`7•e_,J C��rut—L,o /fitl-e-- 7�,h CASE NO.($): N.I 14,.___000 ,,, TYPE OF NOTTTIE&DATE:C''1 • I EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF 'DECISION: : A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (MIS) 96 0006 RENALSSANCESUMMIT' SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: RENAISSANCE SUMMIT Lot Line Adjustment MIS 96-0006 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested a lot line adjustment between Lots 11 and 12 of the Renaissance Summit Subdivision. APPLICANT: Renaissance Custom Homes OWNER: Same 1672 SW Willamette Drive West Linn, OR 97068 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential (1-5 dwelling units per acre). ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3.5 Single Family Residential. LOCATION: 10572 and 10554 SW Naeve Street; WCTM 2S110DA, TAX LOT 2000 and 2100. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.48 and 18.162. SECTION II: DECISION: Notice;is;hereb > Iven;ahatthe:C of Ti ard.Communi, ;;Development Directors designee: ,has APPROVED;the above re uest subject to:conditions o:conditions. q The findin sand conclusions on:which`the decision:is:based are noted in:Section:lU ;:;: NOTICE OF DECISION MIS 96-0006-RENAISSANCE SUMMIT Page 1 • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • PRIOR TO RECORDING:THE LOT LINE;ADJU. .Tm ENT,THE FOLLOWI, . <.;. .::. . CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED ©R FINANCIALLY SECURED: . >:> .Unless`otherwise':noted the staff:contact:<is:John Hadley`. ::>En gineerin <De artment' 503 ;639-4171': 7: 1. A lot line adjustment survey map and legal descriptions showing the existing and proposed lot lines shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. The survey map shall include all access and utility easements. R.18`MONT APPROVAL>SHALL:BE:.VAUD:FO . : HS:>:`` E": ':::: >;;>. >; FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The area has been designated for Low Density Residential use since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1983. The affected parcels were created as a part of the Renaissance Summit Subdivision that was approved in 1994. Vicinity Information: The affected properties are adjoined by other parcels in this developing subdivision to the north and west. The properties are adjoined by the Summerfield Development to the south and east. Site Information and Proposal Description: One of the properties is presently vacant, the other is being developed. The lot line adjustment involves a 1,400 square foot area where additional land area is to be added to Lot 11 from Lot 12. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Lot Line Adjustment -Approval Standards: Section 18.162.060 contains the following standards for approval of a lot line adjustment request: 1. An additional parcel is not created by the Lot Line Adjustment, and the existing parcel reduced in size by the adjustment is not reduced below the minimum lot size established by the zoning district; NOTICE OF DECISION MIS 96-0006-RENAISSANCE SUMMIT Page 2 • • 2. By reducing the lot size, the lot or structure(s) on the lot will not be in violation of the site development or zoning district regulations for that district; and 3. The resulting parcels are in conformity with the dimensional standards of the zoning district. The proposed lot line adjustment is consistent with these standards. The proposed adjustment will reconfigure the lot lines but no additional parcel will be created by the adjustment. Because the subdivision was developed as a Planned Development, no minimum lot size applies to these properties. The 65-foot average width standard also does not apply. All existing and future site improvements comply with the setback requirements of the zoning district. Special Provisions for Lots Created Through Partition Process: Section 18.162.060 states that in addition to meeting the above standards, a Lot Line Adjustment must also meet the following criteria applicable to lots created through the Minor Land Partition process: 1. Lot Width: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. 2. Lot Area: The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. 3. Lot Frontage: Each lot created through the partition process shall front a - public right-of-way by at least 15 feet, or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement. 4. Setbacks: Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. 5. Front Yard Determination for Flag. Lot; When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. 6. Screening on Flag Lots: A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.100.080 and 18.100.090. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. 7. Fire Protection: The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire fighting capabilities. NOTICE OF DECISION MIS 96-0006-RENAISSANCE SUMMIT Page 3 • 8. Reciprocal Easements: Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one (1) lot, a reciprocal easement that will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. 9. Accessway: Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.108; Access, Egress, and Circulation. 10. Floodplain: Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to the one-hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. Criteria 1 is not applicable because no average lot width is required to be maintained within a Planned Development project. Criteria 2 is not applicable because no average lot width is required to be maintained within a Planned development project. Criteria 3 is satisfied as the lots would have a minimum of 25 feet of frontage on SW Naeve Street. Criteria 4 will be addressed because the existing residence complies with the setback standards of the R-3.5 Zoning District. The proposed development on Lot 11 also continues to comply with the setback requirements of the R-3.5 Zoning District. Criteria 5 and 6 are not applicable as these lots are not flag lots. Fire hydrants shall be consistent with Uniform Fire Code standards, thereby, satisfying Criteria 7. Criteria 8 is not applicable as these lots do not share a common driveway. Criteria 9 will be satisfied through the future development of these lots. Criteria 10 is not applicable as neither parcel is within the floodplain. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering Department and Building Division have reviewed the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. The Engineering Department will complete a detailed review of the submitted Lot Line Adjustment survey map and legal descriptions prior to recording of the Lot Line Adjustment. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS Service providing utilities will have the opportunity to review the proposal and decision within the 10 day appeal period and may request reconsideration of the decision if it may adversely affect the utility's or fire district's abilities to provide service to the subject properties or the neighboring properties. NOTICE OF DECISION MIS 96-0006-RENAISSANCE SUMMIT Page 4 0 0 SECTION VII: PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION • Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners - X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: • ::':i•:•.:-....':':••••"'-•::',.-::---,:: _.. : . :',THE DECISI:ON..:SHALL:BE:FINAL;O:N!!MAY 28`::199:6:::. : :: :::. .. :.. UNLESS.:AN,,APPEAL [S:FILED: Appeal: . Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A). and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. :::: THE:DEADLINE`FOR FILING`OF AN APPEAL;IS::3:30:,P M.'ON>MAY:28` 1996.: >:> < Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. / - 0Or.4 May 17. 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner / (., c<—f" ge- �-4' May 17, 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersd _ DATE Planning Manag r I:\CURPLN\PATTYM IS-DEC.DOT NOTICE OF DECISION MIS 96-0006-RENAISSANCE SUMMIT Page 5 0 • .4 WI / • <-1s a UNI ,./P Ai"co�Q` �o. . l� ,y9M wo ,1/44r/HELD y 0 \ • °,-..ks, Z • \- /-EXISTING ME r PR OS(D .,..op... N(''N('' C NWT F MD i AOJJS1EC LD OT SET .. ■ a OMNI 0 .() . Lot 11 1� .;• t t ,� AREA■_, �. Lot 12 t �.. Z; N.A AREA_14372 SF. tt M CC Y j, e N 2 1 . •- `2`--•^ Y';dZsly167.01' .,_.a .. ..-) 93.27' _)di y. . . 1R 1r - _f N o. o. � � SOMMERFIELD NO. 4 O Ill • 0 PLOT PLAN CASE NO. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT EXHIBIT MAP MIS 96-0006 , 41P,, ,, ... 1it111ii 11111,11 I. i �- o8 11I1■ _4 iiiiii/M i.e cm I'I11 1111 I la° LADY '; I III • � �� I I I l 1 IHI 0 0 KABLE._ ge _ h 1 _1_, I 7 "E l Ili _ ---H L E c --D S.W. NEA\IE STREET . 111 �� l:JI RF&r . r. i i 'R ■. 1. . 411.111ppiiii,.0•10- ,0 io• oti t \ ._1 k. %\\ WA �: DR \ . 1k lc-- 4' e-- ‘k‘O ‘ \ ii: _ :..>,% , * 0 :)44)).,:,>• ■ 41 nu% * e . s''' ,.• 45:tokit !4 • a vicinity Map A ' MIS 96-0006 Renaissance Summit Note: Map is not to scale N 1isT 6400 EE �'�,OR 97 224 2S11000-06500 06500 le 0 1052S SS'Esr1IER,M EME: t 2S1 iODq_01900 TIGARD,W HIGHLAND OR 6 RENAISSANCE IN CUSTOM OR 97224 ) WEST FALLS HOMES INC LINN,OR 97068 2SllOpq_0 2100 RENAISSANCE DEVELOPMENT CORP 2S 110D _ 1672 WILLgMEI T A 02000 •RENAISSANCE DEVELO• , '._• - •= RE WIL N,OR 97068 FALLS DR ORP LINN,OR 97068 2S11 ODD-06600 SUMMERFIELD CIVIC 2S i 11 C ASSOCIATION B 01390 10650 SW SU WASHINGT� • TIGgRp OR MMERFIELD DR FACILIT • S 97224 150 N L 'T ADMIN I TtL SBpRO,pR E, 9 M 9-7 45/ f 0 �0c r, 1l0 lac. �a-ev, , • • • Centerline Concepts, Inc_ • April 2, 1996 Renaissance TRACT 2 A tract of land in Lot 12 and part of Lot 11, Renaissance Summit, in the S.E. 1/4 of Section 10, T.2S., R.1W., W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 12, said corner also being the most northerly corner of said Lot 11 and lying on the southeasterly right of way line of S.W. Naeve Street; thence, leaving said right of way line, S49°33'20"E 63.78 feet to an angle point; thence S24°31'19"E 38.07 feet to a point on the line between said Lots 11 and 12; thence S00°09'1.3"E 48.57 feet on said line to the S.W. corner of said Lot 12 (also the S.E. corner of said Lot 11); thence N89°52'41"E 93.27 feet on the south line of said Lot 12 to the S.E. corner thereof; thence N00°13'53"W 83.98 feet on the east line of said Lot 12 to the most easterly N.E. corner thereof; thence S89°48'40"W 58.76 feet on the north line of said Lot 12 to an angle point; thence, continuing on said north line,N54°04'43"W 98.98 feet to the most northerly corner of said Lot 12, said corner lying on the aforementioned right of way line and on a 125.00 foot radius curve to the right; thence, on said right of way line and said curve, through a central angle of 11°40'56" (which chord bears S46°37'29"W 25.44) and arc distance of 25.49 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said tract contains 10,372 square feet more or less. Subject to easements of record. Precise Boundary Surveys 640 82nd Drive Gladstone,Oregon 97027 503 650-0188 fax 503 650-0189 • • l7 et GJ ∎ )- 111 1 Centerline Concepts, Inc. April 2, 1996 Renaissance AREA FROM LOT 11 TO LOT 12 A tract of land in Lot 11, Renaissance Summit, in the S.E. 1/4 of Section 10, T.2S., R.1W., W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the N.E. corner of said Lot 11, said corner lying on the southerly right of way line of S.W. Naeve Street; thence S49°33'20"E 63.78 feet to an angle point; thence S24°31'19"E 38.07 feet to the east line of said Lot 11; thence N00°09'13"W 29.46 feet on said east line to an angle point therein; thence, continuing on said east line, N54°04'43"W 79.35 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said area contains 431 square feet more or less. Subject to easements of record. Precise Boundary Surveys 640 82nd Drive Gladstone,Oregon 97027 503 650-0188 fax 503 650-0189 • s • n • t-IOII 1:1'95 19:0 FR CEI•ITERL I 1•117:. COI ICEPTS 503 r,5OO1S? TO OR TITLE-101:II I I E P-.n . n.- 171111 , Centerline C:or-rcer.)t., I n c. 640 82nd Drive Gincfslone,Oregon 97027 503 650.0188 fix 503 450.01R9 .(7(// 76 CLIENT NAME: RENAISSANCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DRAWN: !.:;op ADDRESS: SCALE: 1",30' LOT: 12 RENAISSANCE SUMMIT DATE: 11-13•••95 ; I III', survey is epprovnt1 ., for ALTA loan policy. - .' Q , OREGON TITLE IMS RA CE CO. ' `tMet/(///i Gj G) .\(1,�h 6' , • �v��' Mpg, �,'1?: /�/./.71—(iL' . i. N iL u iy R '9 1 I qt. I S 89'45'12" W ,._ 58.130' 17 10.0' --- -- 1 V Z Q �o. ,lap 16. e, O rl • Vo •P. 5°fi a hp'o. '� A UD L 1ti ill �� 0 t1�� V= _a 29i r a0' !f0. ,,,---0.J T 20.G' / \o. q O O b. I f U DRAUTAGE EASELOIY I 2 S 8952107" W 93.3/' I --EIGHT FOOT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTIUTY EASEMENT ALONG ALL FRONT AND REAR LOT LINES • MORTGAGE LOAN INSPECTION I HEREBY DECLARE THE REAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ABOVE SHOWN PROPERTY TO BE SITUATED THEREON AS SHOWN. • THERE ARE NO APPARENT ENCROACHMENTS BY OR AGAINST NE DEPICTED PROPERTY,EXCEPT AS NOTED HEREON. THIS LOCATION IS BASED UPON MONUMENTS FOUND.IN PLACE.THAT Annenn TO BE PROPERTY COf1NEnS. THIS DECLARATION IS MADE AT THE REOUEST.AND FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE.OF THE ABOVE NAMED CLIENT.AND IS NOT TO OE USED FOR FUTURE;IMPnOVEMENTS.LAND DIVISION On BOUNDARY LOCATION. PROPERLY SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS OF RECOno. SURVEYOR: I • p•I,y,, V. (i,a 1.5. 42 G$ ACCOUNT NAME: INVOICE NO.! . :I:* T'OTOL. Pn1,F,nr• 1,:I: • • III Centerline Concepts, Inc. 640 82nd Drive Gladstone,Oregon 97027 503 650-0188 fax 503 650-0189 CLIENT NAME: RENAISSANCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DRAWN: SBP ADDRESS: SCALE: 1".30' LOT: 12 RENAISSANCE SUMMIT DATE: 11-13-95 Pty,,` _Q,\r \,,_; \\ h it/Ss„Q 9 si' R)h .98, i S 89'45'12" W 58.80' 10.0' -- -- rl • Z N U o 0 s q,0 - o O O' ,.0- O 5� Z z O x CA N O (A 3 2g6 b o 5.0' 0-�S ,tip m •O. g -- 20.6' O •o. N0' 9s) 57, O N N PRIVATE STORM ' DRAINAGE EASEMENT i S 89'52'07" W 93.37' f --EIGHT FOOT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG ALL FRONT AND REAR LOT LINES MORTGAGE LOAN INSPECTION I HEREBY DECLARE THE REAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ABOVE SHOWN PROPERTY TO BE SITUATED THEREON AS SHOWN. THERE ARE NO APPARENT ENCROACHMENTS BY OR AGAINST THE DEPICTED PROPERTY,EXCEPT AS NOTED HEREON. THIS LOCATION IS BASED UPON MONUMENTS FOUND,IN PLACE,THAT APPEAR TO BE PROPERTY CORNERS. THIS DECLARATION IS MADE AT THE REQUEST, AND FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE, OF THE ABOVE NAMED CLIENT,AND IS NOT TO BE USED FOR FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS, LAND DIVISION OR BOUNDARY LOCATION. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS OF RECORD. SURVEYOR: 94„, V ` C%f„:z;l �. L.S. a 6 g J ACCOUNT NAME: INVOICE NO.: APR 11'96 14 15 FR CEORLINE CONCEPTS 503 6500189 TO RE,SSANCE P.01/01 lit Centerline Concepts, inc.. 640 82nd Drive Gladstone,Oregon 97027 5D3 630-0188 fax 503 650-0189 CLIENT NAME: RENAISSANCE DEVELOPMENT DRAWN: TGB ADDRESS: SCALE: 1''=20' WT: ADJUSTED LOT 11, RENAISSANCE SUMMIT DATE: 4-10--96 --EIGHT FOOT PU6UC AND PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG ALL FRONT AND REAR LOT LINES iS .. e(("e ..,A YN- 0 c.... ,ds. FgaillP , vi_ T11-u-} 3 At s. A _ .6 .1 L s j of ti: hT a A. 0 1St' O Q .•i •« y (n c! .1._ O a T*1 i u tQ `A 1 In cyg I F. DRAINAGE CA T ^E ' r 0 MORTGAGE LOAN INSPECTION 1 HEREBY DECLARE THE REAL IMPROVEMENT'S TO THE ABOVE SHOWN PROPERTY TO BE=WED THEREON AS SHOWN. r THERE ARE NO APPARENT ENCROADHWENTS BY OR AGAINST THE DEPICTED PROPERTY,EXCEPT AS NOTED HEREON.THIS •LOCA11ON IS BASED UPON MONUMENTS FOUND,IN PLACE.THATAPPEAR TO SE PROPERTY CORNERS. 'THIS DECLARATION IS MADE AT THE REOUEST.AND FOR THE OCCLUSIVE UST,OF THE ABOVE NAMED CLIENT,AND IS NOT TD BE USED FOR FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS.LAND DIVISION OR BOUNDARY LQCA11ON. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS OF FiECORD. SURVEYOR" t i LS. � '7� _ ACCOUNT NAME: INVOICE NO.: ** TOTAL PAGE.001 ** • APR 11'96 14:22 FR CE•LINE CONCEPTS 503 6500189 TO ORA TITLE P.01/01 In Centerline Concepts, Inc_ 640 82nd Drive Gladstone,Oregon 97027 503 650-0188 fax 503 650-0189 CLIENT NAME; RENAISSANCE DEVELOPMENT DRAWN,• TGB ADDRESS: SCALE: 1"=20' LOT: ADJUSTED LOT 11, RENAISSANCE SUMMIT DATE: 4-10-96 --EIGHT FOOT PUOUC AND PRIVATE UMW EASEMENT ALONG ALL FRONT AND REAR LOT LINES OA* .\1-6* a; •-oz �;•. 8'g • 0 /\ 1 g'9 Q so N C aw .« Q 1 0'Z ' 011, «o L 18.1' _a (A 0'6° O � O O • LTI <0 j X1' Or 01 a) fn StORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT O S 89'5241' W 67.01' MORTGAGE LOAN INSPECTION I HEREBY DECLARE THE REAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ABOVE SHOWN PROPERTY TO BE SITUATED THEREON AS SHOWN. THERE ARE NO APPARENT ENCROACHMENTS BY OR AGAINST THE DEPICTED PROPERTY,EXCEPT AS NOTED HEREON.THIS •LOCATION IS BASED UPON MONUMENTS FOUND,IN PLACE.THAT APPEA R TO BE PROPERTY CORNERS. THIS DECLARATION IS MADE AT THE REQUEST,AND FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE,OF THE ABOVE NAMED CLIENT,AND IS NOT TO BE USED FOR FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS.LAND DIVISION OR BOUNDARY LOCATION. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS OF F3ECORD. SURVEYOR: LS e —Ke ACCOUNT NAME: INVOICE NO.: lox, TOTAL PAGE.0011 4,-r. FORM No.723-BARGAIN AND SALE DEED(Individual rporate). COPYRIG 9 STEVENS-NESS LAW PUBLISHING CO:PORTLAND.OR 67200 le BARGAIN AND SALE DEED +'Ili i .j .t' 1j KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That RENAISSANCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, i1 .an...Ore.gon...cor:pora.t_ ..Qn ,hereinafter called grantor, ■ for the consideration hereinafter stated, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto .RENAISSANCE...CUSTOM..HOMES-, INC. , an Oregon corporation , ii I. hereinafter called grantee, and unto grantee's heirs, successors and assigns all of that certain real property with the j I. tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining,situated in the County j of __Washington , State of Oregon, described as follows, to-wit: i ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF AS EXHIBIT "A" I. !I This deed is to affect a lot line adjustment between Lots 11 and 12 , il RENAISSANCE SUMMIT. Lot Llne Adjustment No. li Attached as Exhibit "B" is new legal description for Tract 2 , (old ' Lot 12 ) . ,i • 1 (IF SPACE INSUFFICIENT, CONTINUE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE SIDE) ' ■ To Have and to Hold the same unto the said grantee and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns forever. The true and actual consideration paid for this transfer, stated in terms of dollars, is $ 0 ®However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration (indicate whic part of the i h� ).®(The sentence between the symbols O,it not applicable,should be deleted.See ORS 93.030.) •1 In construing this deed and where the context so requires, the singular includes the plural and all grammatical ' changes shall be implied to make the provisions hereof apply equally to corporations and to individuals. • In Witness Whereof,the grantor has executed this instrument this ._.day of May ,19...9.6; if a corporate grantor,it has caused its name to be signed and its seal affixed by an officer or other person duly author- ' ized to do so by order of its board of directors. ' THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS RENA I SSANCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORA ION • INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. , BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE by: . TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY Randal S. Sebastian, President i PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ', ORS 30.930. ,■ STATE OF OREGON, County of )ss. This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 19 , • ,' by II This instrument was acknowledged before me on • , 19 I by Randal S. Sebastian ' as President I. of Renaissance Development Corporation i, Notary Public for Oregon �I My commission expires STATE OF OREGON, ss. ' County of ' Grantor's Name and Address I certify that the within instru- ment was received for record on the day of ,19 , SPACE RESERVED at o'clock M.,and recorded ,, Grantee's Name and Address FOR in book/reel/volume No on !, After recording return to(Name,Address,Zip): RECORDER'S USE page or as fee/file/instru- Renaissance Development Corp. ment/microfilm/reception No , 1672 Willamette Falls Drive Record of Deeds of said County. �; West Linn, Oregon 97068 Witness my hand and seal of 'I ' Until requested otherwise send all tax statements to(Name,Address,Zip): County affixed. NO CHANGE ;i NAME TITLE ii By Deputy ', . • • • EXHIBIT "A" • AREA FROM LOT 11 TO LOT 12 A tract of land in Lot 11, Renaissance Summit, in the S.E. 1/4 of Section 10, T.2S., R.1W., W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the N.E. corner of said Lot 11, said corner lying on the southerly right of way line of S.W. Naeve Street; thence S49°33'20"E 63.78 feet to an angle point; thence S24°31'19"E 38.07 feet to the east line of said Lot 11; thence N00°09'13"W 29.46 feet on said east line to an angle point therein; thence, continuing on said east line, N54°04'43"W 79.35 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "B" TRACT 2 A tract of land in Lot 12 and part of Lot 11, Renaissance Summit, in the S.E. 1/4 of Section 10, T.2S', R.1.W., W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 12, said corner also being the most northerly corner of said Lot 11 and lying on the southeasterly right of way line of S.W. Naeve Street; thence, leaving said right of way line, S49°33'20"E 63.78 feet to an angle point; thence S24°31'19"E 38.07 feet to a point on•the line between said Lots 11 and 12; thence S00°09'13"E 48.57 feet on said line to the S.W. corner of said Lot 12 (also the S.E. corner of said Lot 11); thence N89°52'41"E 93.27 feet on the south line of said Lot 12 to the S.E. corner thereof; thence N00°13'53"W 83.98 feet on the east line of said Lot 12 to the most easterly N.E. corner thereof; thence S89°48'40"W 58.76 feet on the north line of said Lot 12 to an angle point; thence, continuing on said north line, N54°04'43"W 98.98 feet to the most northerly corner of said Lot 12, said corner lying on the aforementioned right of way line and on a 125.00 foot radius curve to the right; thence, on said right of way line and said curve, through a central angle of 11°40'56" (which chord bears S46°37'29"W 25.44) and arc distance of 25.49 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. • • • THIS MAP IS PROVIDED ASOURTESY OF OREGON TITLE INSURAI'COMPANY N This map is made solely for the purpose of assisting in locating said premises, „N and the Company assumes no liability for variations,if any,in dimensions,areas, �� and locations ascertained by actual survey. • . w 5 v • . • e 0 • I• • Z___ S 1 1 0-\---. PT • �.w. r r� R j`/1 771.71 ^ ... - 80.85 156.60 22 189.53 . 117.02 , oPO NITL 3300 3200 e-e 2fi00 17 m 50 „1 2500 - 3400 24 a 137.26 a 16 25 �`3`� a , 23 0-TD N 2700 N Lid 0 116.54 / 47.23 6 N t• zJ,s/ 0:".• aJ `\,.Z 18 N 2400 8.4•si . pg 3500 .3�,. J ''s o ~ 137.40 . 1 ° N g� o _ (�..14.4 15 3100 _ 15 qro It; _ 6 l 1'� a E d�800 ~ $:... 2 °- (I) "' 19 o J ,� 108' .S 87°49 49 W _ git 127.3:; �� 4,0 s ` R=20"' 127.60 .. _-- _._._ 138.15 - . • . ' gi 2300 P 3600 N\ N N 3000 n 2900 00 . 14 .ti tri O P• w 27 T 0 Q m 21 • m 20 q` iIZ78• 102.07 ?O,`bti ��*- $07.44 _62.56 N. \ �^ 2 00 • • � 9 N N A E V Ems, 1,‘J• -, s9q 9e 13• • 73 73 73 73 73 8.23 60 .3S d E 58.80 - 1400 1500 1600 1700\ 1800 1900 -2000 2100 5 • 6 r- 7 • 8 9 0, • 10 0 11 0 • . o '•-4. 12 369°52' 07.18 :.. . 7 ' . - - 3' 73' 7 ' M 7 3' - : 1.60 7` 9 1 T . - ...i= _ f 1.",ft"_,..,ti' a..2?,- ---,x,+" • ys';,.,akiy.-i•5 :. SEE• MAP "s: . , , :.,;: ;�: _L t: tP 0 ,°99‘ t „o ••• • 1)/1kr•J‘ '.-r \V .\\N„ 4.• C ----" _ .. _ - CO ... 0- ,} Oa•All*kit", :F 2110 da Ill S.W. NEAVE STREET _ lef37013;m , _ir , ,.,. ,, HI IDA-0'000 ' 2Sil I bA-021 40 I I 1 •. 1111=110D11 06411 _ 21 D D-'4. 00 7777 C.. . , 1* , 4. - , 2S110DD-06600 ' 1111 L. = CO pf 1ERR •... REEI\ILE % 0 WO ilk 1 .. ■-Ili 11 9.31\05k111, .. DR 111, e\•=4. i.o..... NY' _ - Vicinity Map MIS 96-0006 A Notification Map WO MIplarot la oaks N1 v--HELD NARRATIVE: 1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO ESTABLISH THE BOUNDARY LINES OF LOTS 11 AND 12, RENAISSANCE SUMMIT, IN ORDER TO ADJUST THE LINE BETWEEN SAID N LOTS. / Q 2. BASIS OF BEARINGS: I HELD THE LINE BETWEEN THE \✓ CENTER LINE MONUMENTS FOUND AT THE WEST END OF THE <Dh TANGENT AND THE NORTH END OF THE CURVE AS SHOWN, ,)•y©•` USING THE BEARING COMPUTED FROM THE CURVE DATA / FROM THE PLAT OF RENAISSANCE SUMMIT. 0\-4)1X 3. SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF S.W. NAEVE 0' •y0• STREET: I HELD THE FOUND CENTER LINE MONUMENTS AS e'1_ , ' z? i HELD SHOWN TO COMPUTE THE CENTER LINE CURVE, AND HELD O�ti _ N.E. CORNER LOT 13 SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE 25.00 FEET SOUTHEASTERLY OF b5 �•1 RENAISSANCE SUMMIT AND PARALLEL WIN SAID COMPUTED CENTER LINE. a '/ 4. WEST LINE OF LOT 11: I COMPUTED THE NORTHWEST A ' 2S' CORNER OF LOT 11 BY HOLDING PLAT CURVE DATA, AND -<5∎ / LOT 11.THE I FOUND A BENT 5/8 INCH IRON ROD CORNER OF \ 1`�'' WITH A SMASHED RED PLASTIC CAP NEAR SAID NORTHWEST �' / ,( CORNER OF LOT 11. THE IRON ROD WAS VARY LOOSE AND <c, UP ABOUT EIGHT INCHES. I REPLACED SAID IRON ROD CS/ WITH A NEW ONE IN THE COMPUTED POSITION.- 'S 5, SOUTH LINES OF LOTS 11 AND 12: I HELD THE LINE 1 S ) A BETWEEN THE FOUND MONUMENTS AT THE SOUTHWEST / 1'1-`; Ix `� CORNER OF LOT 11 AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT _ ��• �,,► rye• p,� 12. �� c�• � / '\ gtc HELD \ Z$ /HELD \.`\11 SQ. 6. EAST LINE OF LOT 12: I HELD THE LINE BETWEEN THE 89'52'07" E / 215.00' �� ©Q, r` FOUND MONUMENTS AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 12 (N 89'52'07" E 215.00') �QQ Stu.„ n AND THE NORTHEAST C©RNER OF LOT 13. HELD 5\t‘. � ��L� ©©1 Sys• (�s .�'�' 7. NORTH LINE OF LOT 12: i COMPUTED THE MOST 0`' Q, I"Ir ,�, NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 12 FROM PLAT CURVE DATA. I HELD THE MONUMENT FOUND AT THE ANGLE POINT AND I • . FD DESTROYED ,--�` _N (4i X98 �g ©o HELD FOR LINE THE MONUMENT FOUND NEAR THE S�, •9 ,0 c16 SOUTHERLY NORTHEAST CORNER. -SEE NARRATIVE �'_ ©A• �J �, N 6a; (``1:566° NOTE 4. �sr�, 3 8. LINE BETWEEN LOT 11 AND LOT 12: I HELD THE L-56 6 J �) R MONUMENT FOUND ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY ��, 9,1 5, LINE OF S.W. NAEVE STREET, AND I HELD FOR LINE THE b -0 NJ) 4 MONUMENT FOUND NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 0 �° �`S• EXISTING LINE © 11. I FOUND NO MONUMENT AT THE ANGLE POINT DUE TO kri N N S 89'48'40" W 58.76' HOUSE CONSTRUCTION ON SITE. COMPUTED SAID ANGLE w w 2 PROPOSED •• NOT FOUND (S 89'45'12" W 58.80' POINT HOLDING PLAT BEARINGS, BUT I DID NOT RESET 0 ADJUSTED LINE it- In NOT SET HELD 1 A IT. to in ,3 HELD FOR LINE -. Q; 1 N 89'48'40° E 0.10' 9. ADJUSTED LINE: I COMPUTED AND MONUMENTED THE P b c.c..,.. ADJUSTED LINE AS SHOWN. o 0 cll �. SOUTHERLY N.E. 3 0 0 Cr) 00 Z -C). I CORNER LOT 12 .� ' © a3 N z. N cd CD 1.1 w 03 © NOTES ''� N TRACT 1 O o :- z --THIS SURVEY PERFORMED FOR: RENAISSANCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. /\ : -� ao g \ w AREA = 7,546 S.F. 403 TRACT 2 ., LEGEND:.1V 0 SET 5/8"x30" IRON ROD W/RED PLASTIC 7, AREA = 10,372 S.F. � Ito CAP SCRIBED "CENTERLINE CONCEPTS INC." YL ad P 4 ON APRIL 2, 1996 t`'- o r, • FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD W/RED PLASTIC z .Jo CAP SCRIBED "W.L. MC. L.S. 808" 3 PER PLAT OF RENAISSANCE SUMMIT o z UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ►-i © FOUND 5/8" IRON ROD W/RED PLASTIC © © CAP SCRIBED "W.L. MC. L.S. 808" • PER PLAT OF RENAISSANCE SUMMIT HELD HELD FOR © 0 IN MONUMENT BOX EAST LINE LOT 11 z z HELD FD 5/8"IR O RECORD DISTANCES tic BEARINGS OR CURVE DATA FROM S.W. CORNER LOT 11 " RENAISSANCE SUMMIT S.E. CORNER LOT 12 N 88'56 46 E 0.37 RENAISSANCE SUMMIT \ S 00'09'13" E 0.03' �.� 1 RENAISSANCE SUMMIT PLAT OF RENAISSANCE SUMMIT \ \ (EAST 0.31') \\\ S 89'52'41" W (67.00') 67.01' S 89'52'41" W (93.37') 93.27' _ IR = IRON ROC IP = IRON PIPE S.F. = SQUARE FEET S 89'52'41" W (S 89'52'07" W 160.77') 160.29' < W/ = WITH 1\ \� 1 \� U ti \'.. S O M M E R F H E D N O. 4 CURVE DATA: 6)- 36 SIGNED ON: y" CURVE RADIUS 7 LENGTH CHORD 1 BEARING I DELTA - 1 125.00' 25.00' 24.96' S 58'11'44" W 11'27 33 REGISTERED 2 125.00' _ 25.49' - 25.44' S 46'37'29" W 11'40 56 PROFESSIONAL 3 _ 100.00' 157.28' 141.56' N 44'48'40" E 90'06'55 LAND SURVEYOR PROPOSED LOTS 11 AND 12 PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT RENAISSANCE SUMMIT 4 _— 125.00' � _ 56.60'—_� _� 56.12' N 76'53'49" E � 25'5fi'3T' � / / / S.E.1/4 SEC.10,T.2S.,R.1 W.,W.M. CITY OF TIGARD JULY ,s , WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON JOHN V. THATCHER APRIL 2, 1996 Centerline Concepts Inc. 2681 DRAWN BY: BTA CHECKED BY: JVT 640 82nd Drive Gladstone, Oregon 97027 M: BND RENSUM11 RENSUM11 VAUD THROUGH JUNE 30, 1996 SCALE 1"=20' ACCOUNT i 115-12 503 650-0188 fax 503 650-0189 MO glia --660(e