Loading...
CPA1999-00001 IP I CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Planning Director FROM: Duane Roberts Tp- DATE: 1/22/01 SUBJECT: Extension Request _CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 Fanno Creek Trail Alignment was approved by City Council on June 22, 1999. The approval became effective the same date. A copy of the final order summary sheet is attached. By this memo we wish to formally request a one-year extension of the land use approval period. Thank you for considering this request. .n o lr o / �tr s�.s�-g e� /mac)C_r'er'ki o K 4Z t7,k)54-1C,Lr Ac,N y u sue- ..,�►.�.. ,.z- 4 e.-. r vfiy /—Z3—o / ,� loll hi,01711_ A- I� 120 DAYS= N/A CITY OF TIGARD Community DeveCopme j / �L t! S/iapingA BetterCbmrnu, CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL Case Number(s): COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA]1999-00001 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR)1999-00003 Case Name(s): FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT Name of Owner(s): Various Owners (List available upon request) Name of Applicant: City of Tigard - Attn: Duane Roberts, Project Manager Address of Applicant: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Location: 1S134 AND 2S102: Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over Summer Creek): Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park: Segment 3_ Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a bridge over Fanno Creek): Segment 4: Grant Avenue to Main Street along Fanno Creek: and Segment 5: Main Street South (has a bridge over Fanno Creek) Request: ➢ THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS APPLICATION ON 6/7/99 AND VOTED UNANIMOUSLY TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL. ON' 6/22/99 THE CITY COUNCIL HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE APPLICATION TO RECEIVE PUBLIC TESTIMONY AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION. THE COUNCIL VOTED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE REQUEST AS FOLLOWS: Approval to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources overlay from 0.30 acres of wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, to allow construction of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Trail. Sensitive Lands Review was also approved for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. Action: ➢ ❑ Approval as Requested © Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of Record within the Required Distance © Affected Governmental Agencies © The Affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The Applicant and Owner(s) Final Decision:% THE DECISION WAS SIGNED ON JUNE 22, 1999, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 22, 1999.. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. Appeal: A review of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) according to their procedures. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or the City Recorder at (503) 639-4171. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE CITY COUNC (COVER SHEET) • • • • • -Z 463 251264 . • US Postal Service Receipt for Certified Mail . No Insurance Coverage Provided. • Do not use for International Mail(See reverse) Sent to • Ketro Street&Number 500 NE Grand Avenue 6 Post Office,State,&ZIP Code .rl Portland OR 97232-2736 Postage $ �7 s Fpj!O Certified Fee 1.14 0 r:i8 Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee it - . • Return Receipt Showing to 1 -aS Whom&Date Delivered '<L,E. Return Receipt Showing to Tom,~ ,d V a Date,&Addressee's Address»' 0 .0 TOTAL Postage&if ees $Z47'4 X€ Postmark or Date' a ,' • LL +� -� 1�_ a g • a SENDER: I also wish to receive the 73 •Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. following services(for an H •Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. 9 ar •Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): P. card to you. ai w- •Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not • 1.❑ Addressee's Address c) • i permit. •Write°Return Receipt Requested on the mailpiece below the article number. 2.❑ Restricted Delivery d • . 2 ■The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date to delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. . $•jektLAIjicle Addressed to: 4a.Article Number a0, , Z 463 251 264 cc . Ti. Metro 4b.Service Type 3 E 600 N ❑ Registered ® Certified d E Grand Avenue ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured cn Portland OR 97232-2736 y ❑ Return Receipt for M• • andise ❑ COD • 7. Date of eQlive l/!-� 0 5.Received B : (Print Name) 8.Addre =:1.!s Address(Only if requested Y Il an. e-. s paid) 2( t1 6.S' n re: dressAg t) �-I) a X ((( C G 'l 2 PS For 3811,December 1994 102595-98-8-0229 Domestic Return Receipt 1 ._ 0 . S . • d r J Z 463 251 265 . US Postal Service 1 Receipt for Certified Mail 1 i1 :Oregon Dept. of Land Conservation • ATTN: LARRY FRENCH 1635 Capital Street NE, Suite 150 0 iSalem, OR 97301-2540 . Postage $ )•a` S • it Certified Fee ' .4 O I v Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee 0 rn Return Receipt Showing to Whom&Date Delivered':7''.41.4 4p.Q Return Receipt Shpwutg to Wf>arh;, Ua Date,&Address :S dr ss��, '°. •40 TOTAL Po$age&/Fees 11$ APostrnark of�Dtft s �t. ��,%a�u ILL . t __ g a_ .,.N r — — — — — - ii i ai SENDER: I also wish to receive the •Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. following services(for an rn •Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. g I a> •Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): k card to you. m > ■Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not 1.❑ Addressee's Address ca •perm . Write at°Return Receipt Requested°on the mailpiece below the article number. 2.❑ Restricted Delivery w ■The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date Consult postmaster for fee. fl • P delivered. , o 3.ArticleA_ddressed to:_-__. _ _ —_ 4a.Article Number co i Z 463 251 265 C i Oregon Dept. of Land Conservation; 4b.Service Type `, • 1 E ATTN: LARRY FRENCH , ❑ Registered ® Certified 635 Capital Street NE, Suite 150 I ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured c Salem, OR 97301-2540 j ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 COD 7.Date f Deli,/ l �. 5.Received By: (Print Name) 8.Addr ssee's Address(On! if requested Y . and fee is paid) .Cl to 6. to (Addressee or Ag if w PS For 3811,Decembe 1994 102595-98-0-0229 Domestic Return Receipt • • • -Z 435 490 376 01 . S Postal Service eceipt for Certified Mail +i o Insurance Coverage Provided. • : • • AGENDA ITEM# FOR AGENDA OF 6/22/99 CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Council Review of Fanno Creek Trail Improvements (CPA 99-00001/SLR 99- 00003/Title 3 CU) PREPARED BY: D. &M. Roberts DEPT HEAD OK CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should the Council approve the Fanno Creek Trail proposal, as recommended by Planning Commission? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposal, subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in the attached staff report. INFORMATION SUMMARY The City, as applicant, requests approval of a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to remove the Water Resources Overlay from small portions of three wetlands to allow construction of segments of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Greenway trail between SW Tigard Street and the SW Ash Avenue extension. As part of the same application, the City requests Sensitive Lands approval for trail improvements within the 100-year floodplain and Title 3: Water Quality, Flood Management, and Fish and Wildlife Conservation approval for a conditional use within the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone. In addition to its location within the sensitive lands 100-year floodplain, the proposed trail alignment will unavoidably disturb portions of three wetlands listed as "Significant" on the City Wetland Inventory. The combined disturbance area is approximately 0.30 acre. The City development code prohibits landform alteration within wetlands. In order to develop within wetlands, a comprehensive plan amendment is required. Whenever a local comprehensive plan amendment is proposed, applicable sections of the Metro Functional Plan must be addressed. In the case of the present application,the applicable functional plan section is Title 3, which protects streams, wetlands, and floodplains. At its June 7, 1999, meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and voted unanimously to recommend the City Council approve the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to remove the Water Resources Overlay, Sensitive Lands Review for trail improvements within the 100-year floodplain, and Title 3 Conditional Use within the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone,based on the findings and conclusions included in the staff report. .A copy of the staff report, labeled Exhibit"A", is attached. The approval conditions are the normal requirements for work within sensitive lands and setback areas as set forth in the applicable City, USA, and Metro regulations. { • • As a side note,the most important permit required for trail construction to proceed is the Corps of Engineers fill permit. A separate application for this.permit was submitted last year. Agency action, dependent on this application, is pending as of this writing. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED No alternatives to Council approval have been considered. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY N/A FISCAL NOTES Approximately $460,000 has been budgeted for the completion of the trail sections. i:\citywide\sum\fannocreektrails.sum • • • • CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON ORDINANCE NO.99- AN ORDINANCE APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA 99-00001), SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR 99-00003), AND TITLE 3 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW, REQUESTED TO CONSTRUCT FANNO CREEK TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the applicant has requested approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the City's Water Resources Overlay, Sensitive Lands Review, and Title 3 Conditional Use Review to construct sections of the Fanno Creek Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail; and WHEREAS,on June 7, 1999, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the aforementioned land use applications, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval included in the attached Exhibit"A"; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 1999, the City Council held a public hearing and approved the aforementioned land use applications, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval included in the attached Exhibit"A." NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The proposal is consistent with all of the relevant criteria as noted in the attached Planning Commission recommendation to the Tigard City Council, also referred to as "Exhibit A." SECTION 2: The City Council approves the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Sensitive Lands Review, and Title 3 Conditional Use Review, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval as set forth in the attached"Exhibit A." SECTION 3: Because the prompt implementation of this ordinance is necessary to complete the . construction of the Fanno Creek trail improvements during the current building season, an emergency is declared to exist, and this ordinance is effective upon its passage by the Council. _ ORDINANCE No. 99- Page 1 of 2 I • PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only,this day of , 1999. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of " , 1999. • James Nicoli, Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date i:\citywide\ord\Fannotrail.ord.dot ORDINANCE No. 99- Page 2 of 2 • Agenda Item No. 3_,.,1. Meeting of S \D t qq TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 • STUDY SESSION > Meeting was called to order at 6:32 p.m. by Mayor Jim Nicoli > Council Present: Mayor Jim Nicoli, Councilors Paul Hunt, Brian Moore, Joyce Patton, and Ken Scheckla. > Staff Present: City Manager Bill Monahan; Property Manager John Roy; City Recorder Catherine Wheatley; Associate Planner Duane Roberts; Long Range Planner Nadine Smith; Public Works Director Ed Wegner; Legal Counsel Tim Ramis; City Engineer Gus Duenas; Planner Mark Roberts > ' DISCUSSION: SIDEWALK DESIGN ISSUES DISCUSSION—TIGARD TRIANGLE (Continued from the 6/15/99 Council Meeting) Gus Duenas, City Engineer, reviewed the three options he asked Mr. DeHaas, the City's consulting engineer, to develop for the sidewalk design. He explained that because this was a • unit foot price project, they could move the sidewalk back and forth without impacting the cost very much, as long as they did not affect the quantities. He said that the three options were to move the sidewalk to the curb, to meander the sidewalk based on cut and fill, and to build the sidewalk along the property line with keystone walls built as necessary. He stated that the options of moving the sidewalk and meandering the sidewalk added no costs to the project while building the keystone walls would add between$10,000 to $15,000 to the project cost. Mr. Duenas mentioned the meeting staff held with Mrs. Corliss and Specht Development this afternoon. He explained that because Specht did not want the delay that moving the sidewalk to the curb would cause, Specht preferred leaving the design alone and making the two sides of the street symmetrical. He stated that if the Council approved meandering for the Corliss side, then Specht wanted meandering sidewalks also. Mr. Duenas indicated that meandering sidewalks was a compromise proposed by staff. He reiterated that moving the sidewalk to the curb was not feasible for this project because it would take too long to go through the process of changing the standard. Councilor Scheckla mentioned the poorly maintained condition of separated sidewalks in the area. He asked if they could allow the construction work to continue while granting a waiver for the sidewalk in order to allow sufficient time to modify the standard. Mr. Duenas explained that the contractor would install the curbs and utilities early during the construction. He said that once they did that, then they would want to install the walkways. Mayor Nicoli asked Mrs. Corliss for her comments. Mrs. Corliss reviewed a color map she had made to illustrate the locations of the existing curbside sidewalks. She said that she became involved because the City design impacted her landscaping work along the fence. She said that it made sense to have the sidewalk continuous as opposed to suddenly changing its configuration. She stated that their preference was for curb- tight sidewalks all the way around. She indicated that the Schneiders, one of the homeowners, preferred curb-tight sidewalks for a wider buffer between their property line and the sidewalk. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999—PAGE 1 • • Mrs. Corliss addressed the issue of a timely response. She explained that when she and her husband saw the plans in January, the plans showed a curb-tight sidewalk. They did not find out about the changed layout until May 7. She said that they immediately met with Mr. DeHaas. She asked why installing meandering sidewalks instead of the planned design would not delay the Specht development just as much as changing the design to curb-tight sidewalks would. She pointed out that the standards called for 12 feet of sidewalk and therefore, by definition, the plans did not meet the standards. Mrs. Corliss asked why the City could not grant them a variance to build the sidewalks the way they preferred them. She stated that she did not see an aesthetic conflict between having one side of a block one way and the other side something different. Mayor Nicoli stated that the Council would gladly consider a variance if it were an available option. He explained that, due to both time and legal requirements, they knew that it was not option. He commented that, although the Council has directed staff to revisit the sidewalk issue in the Triangle in the future, that did not help the Corlisses. He said that, for right now, the best they could do was push the land use laws as far as possible. He pointed out that the City had to get permission from the State to change its land use laws. Mrs. Corliss said that she understood the implications of setting a precedent. Mayor Nicoli commented that the best way to handle these situations was to foresee them and to write in the flexibility that the Council needed to address these situations. He noted the difficulty the City had in developing a Triangle plan and the fine-tuning the Council has done in recent months. He reiterated that the Council had to follow the law until it could get the law changed. Mayor Nicoli mentioned that another complication was the requirement on the Specht development approval that the road be completed around the same time as their building. He indicated that they could not delay the project in this case, as they could in other situations. Councilor Patton asked for clarification on staff's option to meander the sidewalk. Mr. Duenas confirmed that staff had the latitude within the standard to meander the sidewalk in response to topographical constraints. He said that the Specht property also had topographical constraints that would allow a meandering sidewalk. Councilor Scheckla asked for clarification on why the Corlisses did not know until May 7 that the staff had changed the sidewalk design. Mr. Duenas confirmed that the design had shown curbside.sidewalks at the January meeting. He explained that they changed the design when Planning staff notified them that they were not following the Triangle standards. He stated that they noticed the change for the second meeting. Mayor Nicoli summarized the staff viewpoint. Staff proposed an option of meandering sidewalks (allowable within the rules) that would provide some relief to the Corlisses for 30% of their property and save the City$10,000 by not having to build walls. Todd Schaeffer, Specht Development, stated that at the second meeting they voiced the same concerns as those raised by the Corlisses with regard to the change in sidewalk design. He said that this street did not need planter strips to buffer pedestrian traffic from auto traffic. He reiterated that people getting out of their cars would step on the planters, not on the sidewalks. He mentioned Mr. Duenas' information at the meeting that the change responded to a design standard which could not be changed without going through a lengthy process. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999—PAGE 2 • • Mr. Schaeffer conceded that it would take an unusual step outside the proscribed process for the Council to decide tonight to change the design to curb-tight sidewalks. He reiterated that they supported the Corlisses option for curb-tight sidewalks. He described their concern as the City not getting the image it wanted in the Triangle if the two sides of a street looked different from each other. Mr. Schaeffer commented that meandering a 12-foot sidewalk strip would look unusual, as the meandering sidewalks shown in the pictures needed a 20-25 foot strip to achieve their park-like look. He argued that, with a narrow strip, the meandering would be tight and not look natural. He said that planting the trees in a linear strip either next to the curb or next to the right-of-way also would look odd. He emphasized that they wanted an attractive first class location with the implementation of the Triangle standards. Councilor Hunt asked for clarification on what Specht Development wanted. Mr. Schaeffer said that they suggested leaving the design the way it was. Councilor Moore mentioned the lengthy process involving the property owners that the City used to develop the Triangle standards. He commented that it was unfortunate that Mr. Corliss, as a member of the Task Force, missed out that the standards called for separated sidewalks instead of curb-tight sidewalks. He spoke to sticking with the standards adopted via this process unless the Council went back through the process to change the standards. Councilor Moore said that the one situation that he would make provision for was flexibility for topographical constraints that disallowed following the standards stringently. He commented that he did not think people would notice anything unusual with the design once they completed the development of the area. He reiterated that he supported sticking with the standard but allowing adjustments for topographical constraints. Councilor Scheckla spoke to providing for more flexibility in the Triangle standards to allow adjustments to fit individual situations and to avoid the monotony of a uniform design. He argued that the area would be better maintained with curb-tight sidewalks, citing the lack of maintenance of existing parking strips. He contended that, without flexibility in the standards, they would not achieve the attractive image they wanted for the Triangle, as exemplified by the Landmark Ford property. He said that they needed incorporate more flexibility into the standards in order to prevent people from coming in to plea bargain with the Council. Councilor Patton agreed with the need to reevaluate the standard for greater flexibility, as discussed last week. She said that staff has developed a plan to allow some flexibility in response to topography. She commented that the plan addressed some of the issues in a small way. She indicated that she preferred a meandering sidewalk to the keystone wall, if doing so was consistent and allowable within the standard. - Councilor Hunt stated that he did not understand the legal technicality of why staff could allow a meandering sidewalk but not a curb-tight sidewalk. Mr. Duenas explained that the standard specified a pedestrian-friendly walkway(a 12-foot walkway with trees between the curb and the pedestrians). He said that they could make an exception to the rule for reasons of topography and allow a meandering sidewalk but changing the design"wholesale to curb-tight sidewalks" would not meet the standard. Councilor Hunt stated that he was not convinced that it was legal to do it one way and not the other. He said that he preferred the curb-tight sidewalks. He disagreed that"pedestrian CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999—PAGE 3 • • friendly"included making people step into the planters as they got out of their cars. Mr. Duenas confirmed to Councilor Moore that the Triangle plan defined the standard as a 12- foot pedestrian walkway with the trees next to the curb. Mr. Monahan pointed out that Mr. Duenas was saying that going to the curb eliminated more of the elements and features of the design standard than meandering did. He indicated that Mr. Duenas conferred with Mr. Hendryx who made a Director's interpretation that meandering was more consistent with the standard than curb-tight. Councilor Scheckla spoke to modifying the standards while construction continued with the sidewalks installed at the end of the construction process. Mayor Nicoli pointed out that it would take six months to get a change through the entire process, including State approval. Mr. Monahan pointed out that allowing a change to one Triangle standard might precipitate requests to change other standards. Councilor Moore agreed that changing the standards opened up the possibility of the very situation they had tried to avoid with the standards in the first place: the Triangle as a hodgepodge of development. Mayor Nicoli summarized the Council discussion as a 5 to 0 decision to allow the plan to move forward. He mentioned the agreement last week to bring the entire standard back at a later date for further discussion. Mr. Monahan reiterated the three options before Council: adhere to the standard for sidewalks against the property line, authorize a meandering sidewalk, or initiate a Comprehensive Plan change resulting in a delay of the project. He confirmed to Councilor Hunt that whichever one they voted for applied uniformly throughout the Triangle. Councilor Moore pointed out that this was strictly an interpretation in looking at the topographical constraints, an option available to anyone who met the same conditions. Motion by Councilor Patton, seconded by Councilor Moore, to adopt the proposal for the exception to allow for the meandering sidewalk for this particular development to the extent that restrictions based on topography, etc., make this more amenable to this LID. Motion passed by majority voice vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Moore and Patton voted"yes;" Councilor Scheckla voted"no"; Councilor Hunt abstained.) [3-1-0] Mr. Schaeffer asked if Specht could meander the sidewalks on their side also. Councilor Moore said that they could do so if they had similar topographical constraints justifying the meandering. Mr. Monahan commented that the Council was giving staff authorization to look at situations on a case-by-case basis to determine if meandering was allowable. Councilor Moore concurred. > COYOTES Mr. Monahan stated that about a month ago an issue concerning coyotes was raised. He referenced the list of complaints distributed by Property Manager John Roy from neighbors in the area involved (from the railroad tracks in Cook Park over to SW 108th). He mentioned working with the US Department of Agriculture (USDA)to address the problem. Councilor Scheckla mentioned the raccoon problem also. He asked how could they look at coyotes and not at raccoons. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 —PAGE 4 • • • Mr. Monahan stated the question was: Did the Council want to do something about the coyotes or leave the situation alone? He indicated that the citizen concerns centered not only on cats and dogs but also on small children. He said that the USDA staff told them that the only method to handle coyotes was to trap and eradicate them; they could not be relocated or rehabilitated. It is believed that a breeding pair of wolves and their pups have settled in the area. Mr. Monahan asked if the Council wanted to authorize the USDA to set up a program to deal with the coyotes. He mentioned that the USDA staff did not recommend going to the press because the City would be flooded by people raising issues and they would not be able to get anything done. Councilor Scheckla mentioned hearing of coyotes sightings over by Deercreek Elementary and Fischer Road. John Roy, Property Manager, told Councilor Scheckla to give his phone number to the people complaining about raccoons and he would get them in touch with the USDA staff who handled trapping nuisance animals county-wide (at no cost to the citizens). Mr. Roy said that the USDA came to the City because of the numerous citizen complaints that the USDA had received from residents in the Copper Creek area. He stated that the USDA Wildlife Specialists evaluated the Copper Creek Greenway and determined that the coyotes had a nesting den somewhere down around the railroad trestle. He mentioned that the coyotes traveled a territory through the whole Riverwood Lane area. Mr. Roy indicated that the coyotes have been in the area long enough to lose their fear of man and have been seen taking cats. He said that the USDA Wildlife Specialists' concern sprang from the case studies that demonstrated that attacks of humans by coyotes started out with the same type of behavior as witnessed here. This behavior included occasional sightings on the street followed by going into yards and on to decks for pet•food, and then progressing to attacking dogs and cats. He stated that the next step was coyotes attacking children under the age of five who could not run fast. Mr. Roy said that the USDA notified the Copper Creek Homeowners Association members to keep their pet food and pets inside. He reiterated that, although the citizens were concerned for their pets, their major concern was for their children. - Mr. Roy said that the USDA Wildlife Service obtained written permission from all affected property owners to set up a trapping program. He mentioned that they had cooperation from the Unified Sewage Agency and the City of Durham also. He described the signage program they would implement to inform the park users of the trapping program. Mr. Roy commented that this was the first time in the 14 years he has worked at the City where they have had a coyote problem anywhere in the City. He pointed out that it was cyclical, and they might have to do it again when the coyotes returned. He emphasized that if they did not implement this program, then they had no other recourse of action other than"doing nothing." Councilor Hunt asked if the City's only involvement would be to grant permission for the USDA to do the trapping. Mr. Roy said that staff has agreed to check the traps daily but otherwise the Wildlife Service handled the trapping and disposal. He confirmed to Councilor Scheckla that the Service also provided the signs. He mentioned that staff would probably help them post the signs. • CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999—PAGE 5 • Councilor Hunt asked about the traps. Mr. Wegner described the spring snare trap used by the USDA as the most appropriate trap for coyotes. He said that the Wildlife Service would place the traps on the identified coyote trail coming out of the park. He emphasized that the coyote trail was not the pedestrian trail. He stated that it was against the law to trap live coyotes and relocate them because of disease. He reiterated that coyotes could not be rehabilitated into pets any more than wolves or bears could be. Mr. Wegner said that this program was what staff felt was necessary to eradicate the coyotes. He referered to the leash law in the City; if a dog owner did not obey this law, then it was possible that a dog could be caught in the trap. He emphasized that no one should be in the area where the traps would be located. He reviewed the use of signs to warn people the closer they came to the area of the traps. He explained that USDA took responsibility and the liability for the program. Mr. Monahan said that the issue was the potential for public outcry. He said that the USDA told them that while coyotes were everywhere, no one else has implemented the program. The Council would be standing alone. Councilor Patton commented that she would rather do that then face a family whose child was mauled by a coyote. The Council agreed. > COUNTRY DAZE Mr. Monahan informed the Council that the Country Daze parade organizers received $500 from the Country Daze account controlled by the Chamber but they needed additional funds to cover the costs of insurance and prizes. He said that they may attend the July 13 Council meeting to ask for$1,000. He reviewed the parade route starting and ending at City Hall or the Water Building. The Council authorized staff to allocate up to $1,000 to the Country Daze parade organizers. The Council indicated an interest in participating in the parade. > WASHINGTON COUNTY LAWSUIT Mr. Monahan advised the Council that the City of Tigard has been named in a lawsuit filed against Washington County with regard to "The Great Wall of Tigard,"the wall built behind Bull Mountain Meadows. He said that Tigard was named because the petitioners were seeking an injunction against the City issuing any further building permits. He explained that this was an inverse condemnation claim against the County. > AGENDA REVIEW • Mr. Monahan reviewed several changes to the agenda. He noted that Item#4 should read 1999/2000 budget, not 1998/1999 budget. He said that Mr. Roberts would like to change the ordinance in Item#8 from being effective in 30 days to an emergency ordinance so that they could build the path this year if they got all the permits. He reported that Mr. Petrie wanted to. set Item#10 over to July 13. He mentioned that Troop 799 would lead the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. • Mr. Monahan advised the Council that Joe Taylor requested recall information. He mentioned that Mr. Taylor has testified about the Erickson Heights subdivision. • Mr. Monahan informed the Council of the City of Sherwood's invitation to the Tigard Council and staff to attend their ethics training. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 —PAGE 6 • • • Councilor Scheckla mentioned the three-minute report on the Tigard water issue broadcast on Channel 8 tonight. He said that the report included talking with both Citizens for Safe Water and H2OK. • Mr. Monahan announced that Jessie Lowman of the Tualatin.Valley Water District was retiring on Friday, July 9. He asked the Council if they wanted staff to start sending mementos regularly to these retirees. • Mr. Monahan mentioned a request from a Tigard gymnastic organization asking the Council to participate in welcoming a group visiting from Germany in August. He asked if the Council wanted the staff to start getting involved in setting up these types of welcoming activities. The Council indicated yes. 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order- City Council & Local Contract Review Board Mayor Jim Nicoli called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. 1.2 Roll Call Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Patton, and Scheckla were present. James Connor of Troop 799 led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 1.4 Council Communications • 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA Staff reported that the 79th Avenue plans would be ready on July 13. Mr. Duenas said that he would have a status report on the design. • Debra Margeson Ms. Margeson presented a petition in opposition to the Murdock Street extension. She asked that the study recommended by Gus Duenas focus on the cost effectiveness of the extension (feasibility versus cost). • Eric Margeson Mr. Margeson mentioned that he would like to see the land become a park. • Betty Banford Ms. Banford reviewed the involvement of the neighborhood in opposing the Murdock Street extension, beginning with learning of the potential extension at the Erickson Heights subdivision hearings. She concurred that the neighborhood wanted the area to be part of the existing park with bicycle and pedestrian connectivity(as opposed to vehicular connectivity). She mentioned concerns with regard to the increased traffic volumes from the apartments. J CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 —PAGE 7 • Mayor Nicoli explained that the Council had to implement the State of Oregon and Metro land use laws or face a rewrite of their local land use laws by the State. He referenced threats made by ODOT, Metro and the Land Conservation and Development Commission to force cities to comply with their laws and regulations. He said that the State required local jurisdictions to maximize connectivity in the cities. He pointed out that the type of request the neighbors have brought forward asked the Council to contravene the land use laws. Mayor Nicoli mentioned that lately the Council has received numerous requests from citizens who did not want their streets improved or put through. He reiterated that the Council had limited control on what they could do about it because of the local, Metro and state land use laws. He remarked that the Council found this a difficult situation to deal with, and one which they knew upset people. Mayor Nicoli discussed the City's work to upgrade the safety of City streets, especially those serving schools. He mentioned the Transportation Task Force currently looking at upgrading the sidewalks on streets in the vicinity of a school. He said that the Council would not ignore the neighbors' petition but it was a difficult request for the Council to deal with because they did have only minimal leeway in the connectivity issue. Ms. Margeson said that the neighbors understood and appreciated the Council's position. She explained that their objection was not based on wanting the City to put the street through but rather on the safety concerns inherent in a narrow, winding street that could not be widened enough to allow two way traffic to pass in both directions. She argued that extending the street for connectivity made no sense if the cars could not safely use the street. Mayor Nicoli mentioned that the Council stood firm in the face of neighbor objections in requiring the connection of neighboring streets with the new streets in the Erickson Heights subdivision. He explained that those neighborhoods asked the Council to hook up all the through streets in the area as a matter of fairness. He said that Murdock Street was mentioned in that discussion. He stated that the City would not put a street through without thoroughly studying the entire length of the street. He commented that he did not know when the City would move on the project. Councilor Moore described the open process used by the City that provided opportunities for citizen input. He pointed out that the Murdock Street neighbors would not be the only citizens involved in the project. He said that, at this time, the Council has given no direction to staff to move forward. He emphasized that it was along process. Mr. Margeson asked that the City use the area for bicycle and pedestrian connectivity instead of vehicular connectivity. Ms. Banford spoke to using the entire area outside the Water District fence as a neighborhood park instead of turning 20% of it into a street. She agreed with improving or moving the existing pathways through the area. Mr. Margeson pointed out that the street would remove one-third of the natural tree grove. • Luther Stowe, 79th Avenue neighbor Mr. Stowe registered his and his neighbors' concerns regarding the improvements to SW 79th Avenue. He said that while they appreciated the improvement and safety enhancements, they did not want to see the street significantly widened or altered in ways that would increase the speed limit. He mentioned concerns with regard to safety and LID costs. • CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999—PAGE 8 S • • Ed Ivey, Murdock Street Mr. Ivey stated that he has lived at the top of the hill since 1973. He explained that the loss of most of the trees on the hill over the past 20 years motivated the neighbors in their fight to retain the few trees remaining in a park. He said that SW 109t (being a steep hill)was a poor connectivity street. He stated that the neighbors on Calloway Hill received no notice of the Erickson Heights subdivision. He agreed that some of the natural paths needed to be upgraded so that the kids did not walk through private property. He suggested that the Boy Scouts or a similar organization undertake that project. 3. CONSENT AGENDA Duane Roberts,Associate Planner, verified to Councilor Hunt that Item 3.6 was reimbursement for expenditures already authorized by the Council (the Cache Creek property). Councilor Hunt asked if the resolution outlining the use of the greenspaces money for the Fanno Creek Trail corridor would allow use of the money for other trails, such as behind City Hall or down by the Tualatin. Mr. Roberts said that they would have to modify the resolution to allow use of the money on other trails. Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Patton, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Patton and Scheckla voted "yes.") [5-0] 3.1 Receive and File: a. Tentative Agenda b. Council Calendar . 3.2 Approve Tualatin Valley Cable Access (TVCA) Public, Education and Government (PEG) Access Franchise Fee—Resolution No. 99-40 3.3 Approve Budget Adjustment No. 11 —Receipt of Northland Insurance Company Funds-- $450,000—Resolution No. 99- 41 3.4 Approve Appointments of Liz Newton and Dee Wise as Deputy City Recorders— Resolution No. 99-42 3.5 Declare the Need to Acquire Property for the Improvement of Certain Streets within the Boundaries of the 696 Avenue Local Improvement District—Resolution No. 99-43 3.6 Amend the Intergovernmental Agreement with Metro for Pass-Through of Greenspaces Funds—Resolution No. 99-44 4. PUBLIC HEARING- 1999-00 USES OF STATE REVENUE SHARING a. Mayor Nicoli opened the public hearing. b. Declarations or Challenges: None • c. Summation by Staff • Cyndi Turner, Acting Finance Director, explained that the City of Tigard was eligible to receive state revenue sharing and has met the requirements for doing so. She indicated that there had been no public testimony at the Budget Committee's May 24, 1999, public hearing. • She said that the budget anticipated the $205,000 of state revenue sharing in the general fund. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999—PAGE 9 • • • d. Public Testimony: None e. Recommendation by Finance Director Ms. Turner recommended that the Council elect to receive state revenues. f. Council Questions or Comments g. Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing h. Consideration by Council: • RESOLUTION No. 99-45 -A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE CITY OF TIGARD PROVIDES SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR THE STATE SHARED REVENUES Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Moore, to adopt Resolution No. 99-45. The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Patton, and Scheckla voted"yes.") [5-0] • ORDINANCE NO. 99-16 - AN ORDINANCE DELCARING THE CITY'S ELECTION TO RECEIVE STATE REVENUES . Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Patton, to adopt Ordinance 99-16. The City Recorder read the number and title of the ordinance. Motion was approved by unanimous roll call vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Patton, and Scheckla voted"yes.") [5-0] 5. PUBLIC HEARING- 1999-00 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET a. Mayor Nicoli opened the public hearing. b. Summation by Staff Ms. Turner reviewed the budget process resulting in the Budget Committee's recommendation of the$50,176,950 budget before the Council. She mentioned an operating budget increase of 12.8%, an increase of 9.0 positions over last year, the $86,000 included for Y2K ready preparedness expenditures, big ticket capital purchases for new and replacement equipment, and ADA facility improvements. She explained that the general CIP budget of$315,000 included a carry over of$156,000. She mentioned the $19,693,800 CIP project budget. c. Public Testimony: None d. Recommendation by Staff Ms. Turner recommended adoption of the improved budget. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999—PAGE 10 e. Council Questions or Comments Ms. Turner confirmed to Councilor Scheckla that the budget did include the Council pay raise. Councilor Scheckla stated that he would vote"no"on the budget because he disagreed with the Council pay raises. f. Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing g. Consideration by Council: Resolution No. 99-46 Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt Resolution No. 99-46. The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 99-46, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD APPROVING THE BUDGET, MAKING APPROPRIATIONS, DECLARING THE AD VALOREM TAX LEVY AND CLASSIFYING THE LEVY AS PROVIDED BY ORS 210.060(2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999/00. Motion passed by majority voice vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, and Patton voted"yes;" Councilor Scheckla voted"no.") [4-1] Mayor Nicoli thanked Gene Farnstrom (in attendance) for chairing the Budget Committee this year. 6. PUBLIC OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT -- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STAFF REPORT Mr. Duenas mentioned the CIP budget process begun in March with the CITs. He said that staff has made some further changes since the Planning Commission's approval on May 17. He presented his report using graphics illustrating the projects in Streets, Parks, Sanitary Sewer/Storm Drainage, and Water. Mr. Duenas reviewed the street projects continuing from FY 1998-99,including the Gaarde Street design and right-of-way acquisition, the Walnut Street/Tiedeman Avenue realignment, the Lincoln Street improvements (a CDBG funded project), the SW 69th Avenue LID, and the design for SW 79 Avenue. He noted the new projects for FY 1999-00, including the Burnham Street design and acquisition, the Maple Leaf Street and SW 71st Avenue design, and a traffic circulation study for the Murdock extension area(SW 109t to SW 97th) to evaluate the connections needed in the area. Mr. Duenas stated that they were continuing the pavement major maintenance program and including county roads this year(paid for by the County). He mentioned developing a comprehensive traffic calming plan to look at neighborhoods instead of focusing on individual streets. Mayor Nicoli asked if the SW 79th Avenue improvements referred only to planning and design. Mr. Duenas said yes. He indicated that staff has already said two neighborhood meetings to get input from the neighbors. He said that staff did not want a freeway in the area either but they CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999—PAGE 11 • • did have to follow design standards. He mentioned bicycle connectivity in the area. He said that staff was trying to incorporate all the necessary elements while still addressing the neighborhood concerns for safety. Mayor Nicoli asked in which budget was the Walnut/Tiedeman intersection improvement • located. Mr. Duenas said that it was in the current year's budget but they were carrying the money forward to next year. He directed the Council to Appendix A for a comprehensive listing of the projects in the street system program. Councilor Scheckla asked why staff included SW 107t Avenue from Cook Lane to Park Street (a private street) in the pavement major maintenance program. Mr. Duenas explained that Council gave direction at a previous meeting for staff to proceed with the project, provided that the City acquired all the land. He said that the property owners have already dedicated the property and that staff was working with the City Attorney's office to get title to the remaining 25 foot strip of land that was never recorded (as it should have been). He stated that, as soon as the City obtained all the land, the street would become a public street. Mr. Duenas reviewed the changes made to the parks system program. He said that when staff redid the estimates for the boardwalks and bridges, they discovered that some segments cost quite a bit more than the original estimates had shown. He explained that staff decided to reschedule construction of the most expensive segment, the Woodward Park trail, to FY 2001/02. Mr. Duenas mentioned substituting the Fanno Creek restoration project and deleting the ineligible Cache Creek Park master plan. He noted the addition of the Summer Lake Park master plan update and the reallocation of some greenspace funding to supplement the trail project. He indicated that he included the Summer Lake bottom barriers in the hopes of completing the promise made to the residents. Mr. Duenas reviewed the sanitary sewer program projects. He said that they were continuing the sanitary sewer major maintenance program and the neighborhood/commercial sewer extension program. He noted the projects requested by the Public Works Department, including replacement sewer lines for Commercial Street and Bonita Road. He mentioned the need for sanitary sewer facility plan studies as part of creating a sanitary sewer public facility plan this summer. Mr. Duenas reviewed the storm drainage system program. He noted the projects they were carrying forward to next year, including the Lincoln Street drainage improvements, the SW 116th Avenue drainage improvements, the Washington Square/Cascade Blvd project (also listed in the Unified Sewage Agency's master plan), and the Summer Creek wetland restoration at SW 12151 Avenue. He mentioned the projects requested by the City maintenance people or coming out of land developments. Mr. Duenas reviewed the water system program projects. He noted the water projects done in support of road projects, such as the Walnut/Tiedeman intersection project, the County's Beef Bend/Elsner project, and the Lincoln Street improvements. He mentioned the distribution and transmission mains at North Dakota and 150`h. Mr. Duenas asked the Council to approve the program with the recommended changes. PUBLIC TESTIMONY CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999—PAGE 12 i • Mayor Nicoli opened the meeting to public testimony. • Kathy Steger Mr. Sleger requested that the traffic circulation and feasibility study for the Murdock Street extension area include Kable Lane and Lady Marion by name. Mr. Duenas explained that those two streets were included within the project's defined boundaries, even though he did not list all the streets by name. Mayor Nicoli closed the public testimony. • COUNCIL DISCUSSION Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Moore, to direct the City Engineer to proceed with the CIP. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Patton and Scheckla voted"yes.") [5-0] 7. INFORMATION PUBLIC HEARING -- FORMATION OF SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 13 -- SW 100TH AVENUE WEST OF INEZ Greg Berry,Engineering Department, stated that the reimbursement district would provide service to seven homeowners at the intersection of SW 100th and west along Inez Street. He said that the estimated cost of$102,000 divided among the seven owners yielded a per owner cost of $14,640. He mentioned that staff proposed implementing the $8,000 cap, limiting those connecting within one year of the final approval of the engineer's report to an$8,000 cost. PUBLIC TESTIMONY Mayor Nicoli opened the hearing to public testimony. • Don Quinn Mr. Quinn stated that he opposed the formation of the district on the grounds that the plan should include lower Inez as well as upper Inez. He said that to hook up his line to SW 100th took 100 feet more line than hooking up to a line in Inez. He spoke to running a line up Inez from SW 98th in order to pick up more people.. He asked the City to send out a letter to the seven homeowners to see how many really wanted this district. He supported waiting and doing the whole thing at one time. Councilor Hunt asked if staff sent a letter out to the property owners. Mr. Duenas explained that staff has tried several different ways in the past to get sewer to this area. He said that most of the people on Inez Street did not want the sewer. Therefore staff dropped it because the intent of the program was to accommodate the people who wanted sewer. He stated that one of the property owners in this district has asked for sewer for many years. He indicated that when four out of the seven property owners indicated support for a sewer in response to letters, staff went ahead with the district. • Brigitte Partington, Inez Street Ms. Partington said that she has lived here since 1971. She asked for clarification on how the CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999—PAGE 13 • • program worked to accommodate a few people while not impacting their adjacent neighbors. Mayor Nicoli explained that the City would put in the sewer line. The property owners paid nothing and owed nothing until they chose to hook up to the line. Councilor Scheckla pointed out that the longer a'property owner waited to hook up, the higher the dollar amount would be (due to inflation). However if a property owner could wait for 15 years to hook up, then he/she did not pay the district assessment at all. Councilor Hunt noted that property owners hooking up within one year paid only$8,000 of the assessment. Mayor Nicoli explained that the intent of the program was to get as many people in the City hooked up to sanitary sewer as possible, including those pockets in the older parts of the City where the residents could not afford to bring sewer in on their own. He said that when half of the people in a neighborhood wanted sewer, the City installed it, financing it out of its own pocket. He mentioned that the requirements of the Endangered Species Act would probably push this program harder. Ms. Partington asked how the Endangered Species Act impacted sewers. Mayor Nicoli explained that, through a process called"non-point discharge," septic systems released sewage into the water table and it eventually ended up in the rivers. He said that the Unified Sewage Agency was looking at bringing all areas of the Tualatin Basin into compliance. He commented that USA would probably offer a similar sewer reimbursement district program to areas outside city limits. Ms. Partington argued that by the time the water from the drainfield got down to the water table, it was fairly clean. Mayor Nicoli pointed out that the problem was not with the discharge from an individual tank into the water table but with the large number of septic tanks that remained in the County discharging septic tank water into the water table. Ms. Partington asked if sometime down the road, the City might require the property owners to hook up to the sewer. Mayor Nicoli said that that was a possibility but noted that the federal government would instigate that requirement. Councilor Scheckla pointed out that Ms. Partington's septic tank water impacted the people below her on the hill. Ms. Partington said that someone would have to prove that to her. • Annette Marshall Ms. Marshall pointed out that half of the Inez people were in attendance. She asked how much the connection fee would be, in addition to the $8,000 district assessment. Mr. Duenas said that the connection fee was $2,335. Councilor Scheckla pointed out that if a property owner hooked up right away, the total cost was just over$10,000 (a savings of$5,000) whereas if he/she waited to hook up, the cost would be considerably more. Ms. Marshall asked if thetcosts would go down if the law mandated more people hooking up. Mayor Nicoli indicated that they might be able to save some money by combining several small projects but he was not certain that the costs would go down. Councilor Patton pointed out that frequently Congress passed unfunded mandates, requiring local governments to do something but not providing any money to do it. Councilor Scheckla noted that a house on sewer would sell more quickly than a house not on sewer. Councilor Moore asked what the cost would be to replace a septic tank system. Mr. Berry stated that in most of these areas, installing a replacement or new septic tank system was not a feasible option because of lack of space (it needed at least half an acre for the drain field) and the CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 22, 1999—PAGE 14 • • difficulty of getting the equipment into the back yard. He mentioned the high ground water that would cause a new system to fail. • A gentleman in the audience said that the person who bought the old church house on SW Canterbury Lane two years ago paid between$8,000 to $10,000 to replace the septic system. • A lady asked if they had to pay the $8,000 cap up front or could they pay it off in installments. Mr. Duenas said that the City's Finance Director has stated clearly that he was not in the. financing business, and therefore the entire amount was due at the time of hookup. He recommended that the property owners obtain a loan. • • Janet McBride Ms. McBride asked what the cost would be per household if the district included the people on lower Inez. Councilor Moore said that those who hooked up within the first year would pay $8,000 no matter-which direction the sewer line went. Mr. Duenas confirmed that the assessment for a line in the other direction would be $8,000 to $9,000. Ms. McBride asked what the difference was if the people on lower Inez did or did not want sewer, if the environmental laws and the federal government would force them off septic tanks anyway. Mayor Nicoli pointed out that it was not yet law. He stated that USA would brief the Council on this direction shortly. He reiterated that the City tried to reach the neighborhoods in need of sewer that had 50%of the residents wanting to hook on. He explained that the money paid by those hooking on went back into the program to fund the sewer for another neighborhood. He stated that the City began with the older neighborhoods because they were at such a disadvantage in trying to hook on to sewer. Ms. McBride contended that the City did their street a disservice in allowing an improvement district just one street over because that gave the properties on one side of the street the opportunity to hook up to that district. She said that it was unfair because only one side of the street would pay for sewer down Inez. Mayor Nicoli referenced the $8,000 cap and the City eating the rest of the assessment as part of the fairness issue. Ms. McBride contended that they did not get much in their area for their tax dollars, as they did not have street lights or sidewalks either. She suggested that the City leave Mr. Quinn out of the district and allow him to connect to the other sewer when it was put in because his connection fee would be so much higher than everyone else's. Ms. McBride said that only one of the seven property owners was desperate for sewer while the rest just saw it as what happened if you bought a house with a septic tank. She argued that the neighbors did not have a real choice because of the hammer held by the City - pay now or pay even more later. Councilor Moore pointed out that the City installing the sewer meant that it was available to the property owners in case of an emergency. Councilor Moore noted that Ms. McBride was listed as favoring the district. Ms. McBride said that she did not care one way or the other. She reiterated that only one side of the street had to pay for the improvement district. She suggested that the City make this a bigger district by going down the hill, since those people would have to go on sewer at some point anyway. Mayor Nicoli reiterated that, with the limited funds available to this program, the City went first to the neighborhoods with a 50%majority in support of sewer. He explained that this was a way for the City to maximize its investment while at the same time getting as many people on sewer CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999—PAGE 15 S as possible. Mr. Duenas pointed out that this area at the top of a hill was one of the most difficult locations around. He said that only a limited number of people could be hooked on in a certain direction. • A gentleman asked what the costs were(beyond the $8,000 and the $2,300) to get from the street line to the house. Mayor Nicoli mentioned hiring a plumber to install the line and decommission the septic tank. He said that the City brought the lateral line to the property line. Mr. Quinn stated that it cost his neighbor on Pembroke $2,200 to install a 70-foot line to hook up to the sewer lateral. He alleged that the City designed this program to placate the one neighbor on the hill who has been trying to get sewer for years. Councilor Moore stated that he has not met the gentleman. He argued that alleging that the City did this program for one. individual was ludicrous, citing the other neighborhoods put on sewer through this program before this neighborhood came up for consideration. Ms. Partington reiterated that the whole community should do the program at once, not just a few people. She asked if doing so would reduce the cost to something reasonable. Mr. Duenas said that the easiest installations cost between $6,000 to $8,000 with the more difficult ones costing much more. He confirmed that this neighborhood was one of the most difficult areas to sewer because it was on a hill. Mr. Duenas explained that the City could not extend a sewer line for miles and had to go with the one closest to the properties. In this case, the closet line was in SW 100"'. He reiterated that the people on Inez indicated no interest in sewer. Councilor Scheckla asked Mr. Duenas about the Fairhaven Road district. Mr. Duenas said that more than half of the 29 homes in that district have hooked up. He reiterated that, after 15 years, the property owners did not have to pay the assessment, although they still had to pay the $2,359 connection fee. Councilor Scheckla pointed out that the connection fee could be considerably higher 15 years from now. Mayor Nicoli commented that he allowed this hearing to drag out because his experience indicated that if he dragged it out long enough, enough people would ask questions to allow the City to explain the situation fully. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Mr. Duenas recommended approval of the district. • Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing COUNCIL DELIBERATIONS Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt Resolution No. 99- 47. The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 99-47, A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT NO. 13: CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES -JUNE 22, 1999—PAGE 16 • Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Patton and Scheckla voted in favor.) [5-0] 8. PUBLIC HEARING- (QUASI-JUDICIAL) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT— FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT (CPA 1999-00001, SLR 1999-00003) The City of Tigard is requesting to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources overlay from 0.30 acres of wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, to allow construction of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Trail. Sensitive lands approval is also requested for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. LOCATION: 1S134 and 2SX102; Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over Summer Creek); Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Segment 3: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a bridge over Fanno Creek); Segment 4: Grant Avenue to Main Street along Fanno Creek; and Segment 5: Main Street South (has a bridge over Fanno Creek). ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3. a. Mayor Nicoli read the hearing title and opened the public hearing. b. Declarations or Challenges There were no declarations or challenges. All members indicated that they were familiar with the application. c. Staff/Applicant Report Mark Roberts, Planner, pointed out that the City was the applicant in this proposal to construct five segments of the Fanno Creek Trail. He stated that the Tigard Street and SW Ash Avenue extension required a Sensitive Lands Review because it involved land form alterations in the 100 year flood plain. He said that this extension also required a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to remove 0.2 acres of affected wetland from the water resources overlay zone. Mr. Roberts said that the applicant demonstrated that the proposed development would not negatively impact the 100 year flood plain. He stated that the ESEE analysis provided by the applicant demonstrated that the economic, social and energy benefits of the trail outweighed the environmental consequences of losing a small portion of the wetlands. He indicated that the applicant has met the Sensitive Lands Review standards and the MetroTunctional Plan Title 3 standards for a conditional use trail. He reported that on June 7, 1999,the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval to the Council. d. Public Testimony: None e. Council Questions • f. Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing g. Staff Recommendation Mr. Roberts recommended approval of the proposal with the conditions of approval as outlined in the staff report, and the amendment adding an emergency clause to the ordinance. h. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 99-17 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999—PAGE 17 • • Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Patton, to adopt Ordinance No. 99-17 with the emergency clause change. The City Recorder read the number and title of the ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 99-17, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 99-00001, SLR 99-0003, AND TITLE 3 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW, REQUESTED TO CONSTRUCT FANNO CREEK TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. Motion was approved by unanimous roll call vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Patton and Scheckla voted in favor.) [5-0] 9. FORWARD INITIATED BALLOT MEASURE TO WASHINGTON COUNTY ELECTIONS DIVISION FOR THE SEPTEMBER 21, 1999, SPECIAL ELECTION STAFF REPORT Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder,reported that staff found that the Citizens for Safe Water group followed the necessary steps in submitting their petition to the Council. She said that the attached resolution forwarded the ballot measure requesting a Charter amendment with regard to a new section of the Charter, Section 51. She read the new section: "The City of Tigard shall not use the Willamette River as a drinking water source for its citizens unless the question of using the Willamette River as a drinking water source has been approved by not less than 50% of the voters voting in a city wide election." ' Ms. Wheatley stated that this special September election would cost the City approximately $16,764. Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt Resolution 99-48. The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 99-48, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TIGARD SUBMITTING TO THE VOTERS A PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT TO. BE CONSIDERED AT THE SEPTEMBER 21, 1999, SPECIAL ELECTION. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of the Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Patton and Scheckla voted"yes.") [5-0] 10. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR PACIFIC RIDGE TO USE CITY PROPERTY FOR PRIVATE WETLANDS MITIGATION Mayor Nicoli said that the applicant requested to withdraw this item. 11. WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION—REQUEST FOR FUNDING (Discussion continued from the 6/15/99 Council Meeting) Mayor Nicoli said that he was not yet ready to make a recommendation but hoped to be able to make a report next Tuesday. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999 —PAGE 18 ` • •• 12. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS—None. 13. NON AGENDA ITEMS —None. 14. EXECUTIVE SESSION—Canceled. 15. ADJOURNMENT: 9:13 p.m. 'LC ' F ' , Attest: Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder "r, City o' igard Date: Ooiaq I:\ADM\CATHY\CCM\990622.DOC • t • CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 22, 1999—PAGE 19 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FANNO CREEK TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS Proposal Summary • The City, as applicant, requests consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to remove the Water Resources Overlay from small portions of three wetlands to allow construction of segments of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Greenway trail between SW Tigard Street and the SW Ash Avenue Extension. The combined area included within the wetland fills in question is approximately 0.30 acres. As part of this same application, the City requests Sensitive Lands approval for trail improvements within the 100-year floodplain and Title 3: Water Quality, Flood Management, and Fish and Wildlife Conservation approval for a conditional use within the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone. Introduction The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1983. The comprehensive plan includes a bicycle/pedestrian trail element that calls for a bikeway along Fanno Creek. The Comprehensive Plan and 1987 Tigard•Park Plan identify the Fanno Creek bikepath as a continuous, off-street path that follows the route of Fanno Creek as it flows between the northern and southern city limits. Between the 1980's and mid-1990's, new development in the area of the Fanno Creek Greenway was conditioned to provide the bikepath as conceptually identified in the Comprehensive Plan. In order to add more specificity to the comprehensive plan designation, in 1997 the city conducted a technical study, with extensive public participation, to map the alignment of the trail from Tiedeman to Durham Road. In designating the most appropriate route, the study considered wetlands, soils, vegetation, wildlife, and topography within the greenway corridor as well as various social factors, such as neighborhood and employment locations. The Fanno Creek trail is part of the Regional Trail System and 40-Mile Loop first identified in the early 1900's. Metro is the government responsible for regional planning and in the 1990s designated the Fanno Creek Greenway Trail as a priority project and promoted a bond measure for acquisition of property and trail construction. To date, regional bond measure funds have been used to purchase two properties, respectively covering seven and eleven acres, within the Tigard portion of corridor. The present, city-sponsored project includes the construction of five trail sections all located between Tigard Street and Ash Avenue. Along with existing trail sections, these projects will complete approximately two miles of trail inter- . T connecting at Scholl's Ferry with 1.6 miles of trail in Beaverton. A total of $460,000 has been allocated for right-of-way acquisition and construction of the pathways. The projects are programmed for construction in 1999. The properties within the Greenway areas proposed for the pathway improvements are zoned R-4.5, IP, and CBD. The topography generally consists of typical floodplain, with the creek bordered by steep banks and broad floodplain. Approximately two-thirds of the Greenway floodplain within the project area is wetlands. The main benefits of the projects include providing opportunities for healthy, outdoor recreation activities, such as walking, jogging and bicycling; increasing • pedestrian and bicycle access through the community; and providing access to the natural environment as a refuge from the stresses of urban life. A 1998 citywide park and open space needs assessment indicates that walking is the most popular recreation activity in the City and that the demand for additional recreational trails is high. Proposal Description The proposed five trail segments consist of a 10-foot wide paved pathway with two feet of shoulder on either side. This width is consistent with regional and state standards for the Fanno Creek Trail and is designed to provide for the safe passage of two bicycles approaching in opposite directions. The five segments are, from north to south: Segment 2: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (Fowler School Site) Wetland Impact Area: 11,250 SF (750 linear feet); 52 CY excavation; 427 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Summer Creek Segment 3: Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park (Woodard Park Site) Segment 4: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue Wetland Impact Area: 1,995 SF (133 linear feet); 0.17 CY excavation; 117 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Segment 5: Grant Avenue to Main Street Segment 6b: Main Street South Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Total Wetland Impact Area: 13,245 SF (0.30 acre) or 833 linear feet of trail; 52.17 CY removal and 544 CY fill Three bridges are part of the project, and will span Fanno Creek (twice) and Summer Creek from top-of-bank to top-of-bank. Project Impacts and Alternatives Alternative sites are limited due to the intended location of the trail adjacent to Fanno Creek, the location of the existing trail system, and the 2 . , • • City's ownership and easement procurement. Segment 2, Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue, has unavoidable wetlands within the project area. Beginning at Tigard Street, the trail is routed outside the wetland boundary and crosses the unavoidable portion of the wetland near It's narrowest section. The trail then skirts the edge of the wetland and the edge of the playing field and associated equipment (fitness course signs, workout equipment stations, and ballfield backstop) and impacts only a narrow fringe of mowed and disturbed wetland. All Oregon ash trees on the north side of Fanno and Summer Creeks are avoided, and only emergent wetland is impacted. The bridge crosses Summer Creek where no adjacent wetlands are present, and then joins with Tiedeman Avenue to connect with Segment 3. Segment 3, Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands in the park as well as an ODOT mitigation area north of the park. Segment 4, Woodard Park to Grant Avenue: The trail skirts above the wetland boundary where possible, impacting a narrow fringe of emergent wetland on the north side of Fanno Creek. The trail runs in an upland area on the south side of Fanno Creek and then crosses a narrow neck of unavoidable emergent wetland, avoiding forested wetland areas. Trail alignment is constrained through this segment due to steep upland slopes on the north side of Fanno Creek; the trail has to cross a backwater emergent area on the south side of Fanno Creek to connect with the paved ramp up to Grant Avenue. Impacts to the backwater wetland area are avoided by constructing a boardwalk bridge across the wetland area, with piers in the upland (top-of-bank to top-of-bank). Segment 5, Grant Avenue to Main Street avoids wetlands. The trail alignment has been routed outside of the wetland area; it connects with an existing concrete walk located north of Pacific Highway and north of Main Street. Segment 6b, Main Street South: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands, and a large section of the proposed trail on the east side of Fanno Creek was scrapped due to the extensive amount of wetlands present. A part of the trail in this section is a boardwalk, to raise the trail up and avoid excessive fill (in uplands) near the top-of-bank of Fanno.Creek. In this segment,the location of the bridge crossing Fanno Creek was constrained by the City's easements on the adjoining properties (and by construction of a new building south of Main Street on the east side of Fanno Creek). The trail continues in upland on the west side of Fanno Creek to connect with the existing paved pathway. A southern portion of this trail segment connects to the Ash Street right-of-way, avoiding wetlands on both sides of the trail. 3 • 4 • In order to minimize construction impacts to the waterway and wetlands, best management erosion control practices (silt fences and biofilter bags, as outlined in the Unified Sewerage Agency Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans, Technical Guidance Handbook) will be specified in the construction documents prepared by the City of Tigard. Physical and Biological Description of Impacted Wetland Areas The wetlands along the trail alignment have been delineated and described in two wetland delineation reports prepared by Fishman Environmental Services (FES) in the spring of 1998. The two impact areas are described below: The northernmost impact area is in Segment 2, on the Fowler School site owned by the Tigard-Tualatin School District. The trail skirts abroad flood plain of Fanno Creek dominated by reed canarygrass and meadow foxtail, and crosses a narrow neck of the wetland that extends away from the floodplain area (this wetland neck extends upslope to the west, offsite to a wetland seep area). The trail then impacts a narrow grassy fringe of emergent wetland east of the school ball field and west of an Oregon ash wetland forest that is immediately adjacent to Fanno Creek. Part of this wetland area is regularly mowed as lawn associated with the ball field. Soils in the floodplain area were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silty clay loam, with no redox concentrations to 6 inches, over a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) stiff clay, with brown (10YR 5/3) redox concentrations to a depth of 16 inches. Soils in an upslope position near the crossing of the wetland neck were a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) silty clay loam to 16 inches, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations, and gray (10YR 5/1) depletions at 14 inches. The floodplain receives high-water over-bank flows from Fanno Creek and has a high groundwater table. The other segment with wetland impacts is Segment 4, north of Grant Avenue. The trails passes through an emergent meadow associated with the floodplain of Fanno Creek. The meadow area is dominated by bentgrass and reed canarygrass, and has soils that were a very dark grayish brown and dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2 and 4/2) sandy silt loam, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations and dark gray (5Y 4/1) depletions in the surface 10 inches. The soils had a compacted hardpan at 10 inches, possibly disturbed from previous sewer line construction. The second wetland crossing in this segment occurs on the opposite (south) side of Fanno. Creek, where the trail crosses a narrow finger of sparsely-vegetated, disturbed wetland dominated by climbing nightshade and red-osier dogwood, with Himalayan blackberry on the slopes. The trail avoids the surrounding Oregon ash and red alder trees near the trail. Water quality in this • backwater area appears to have been negatively impacted by trash and debris. 4 . • • Wetland Mitigation In order to compensate for the unavoidable disturbance of wetlands and meet state and federal mitigation requirements, the City has developed a conceptual mitigation plan. The proposed plan calls for the mitigation of the 0.30 acre wetland impact by enhancing 0.90 acre of non-forested, reed canary grass and meadow foxtail- dominated wetland, located in the floodplain area east and south of an Oregon ash wetland forest adjacent to Fanno Creek, on the Fowler School site in Segment 2. This provides a 3:1 enhancement ratio and mitigates adjacent to the largest wetland impact incurred by the trail system. The existing wetland forest area is dominated by Oregon ash and reed canarygrass, with scattered clumps of Piper's willow, clustered wild rose, and Douglas' spirea. The wetland will be enhanced by planting large Oregon ash saplings and Piper's willow cuttings, to extend the forested wetland area into the meadow area, and appropriate shrubs (clustered wild rose, red-osier dogwood, and Pacific ninebark) will be planted adjacent to the existing forest near the trail to provide additional wildlife habitat. The trail will still remain open and not obscured by the plantings (for security reasons). A complete copy of the proposed mitigation plan is included with the printed material submitted as part of this application. Sensitive Lands Review Listed below are the approval criteria contained in the Sensitive Lands section of the Tigard Community Development Code along with the applicant's response to each: 1. Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. The attached letter signed and stamped by a City of Tigard state-registered civil engineer certifies that the proposed project will preserve the floodplain storage capacity of the portion of Fanno Creek within the project area, that the zero-foot 5 S • rise floodway will not be disturbed, and that the project will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. 2. Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.120 of the community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards. The land within the project area is zoned R-4.5, IP; and CBD. Landform alternation is permitted in areas designated as commercial or industrial. The proposed use is community recreation and, as such, is an exception to the prohibition on landform alteration within residentially designated zones. 3. Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year floodplain. As indicated in the attached memo from Vannie Nguyen, P.E., the proposed alteration will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100- year floodplain. 4. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as untimely. The proposed alteration is a pedestrian/bicycle pathway project that carries out the City pathway plan and the policies and objectives of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. 5. The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood. The above-mentioned memo from city engineer Vannie Nguyen, P.E., verifies that the pathway will not be located above the elevation of an average annual flood. - 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained 6 • The approval of the Division of State Lands has been obtained. A copy of the project permit is included with this submittal. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approval is pending. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and ESEE Analysis The Water Resources Overlay provides for the consideration of a comprehensive plan amendment to remove the WR overlay designation from a property based on a specific development proposal. According to 18.85.140, the approval process requires the applicant to justify the appropriateness of the proposed removal based on the results of a State Goal 5 ESEE analysis. In response to this requirement, the applicant's analysis of the economic, social, environmental, and energy consequences of allowing the proposed pathway use is provided below. Economic Consequences Numerous studies illustrate that proximity to natural resources increases property values. Similarly, inclusion of greenways in new developments has been shown to increase the land value of surrounding properties and to accelerate lot sales. Other studies have shown that property values tend to decrease by distance from open space. However, no studies could be located that specifically address the effect on land values of the placement of an all-weather pathway through a greenway. In general, based on the popularity of pathways, it is possible to speculate that a well-developed greenway path system contributes to rather than detracts from the economic well being of a community. Social Consequences The social and other benefits of preserving wetlands are widely recognized in this community. Though its Sensitive Land and Water Resource Overlay code provisions, Tigard currently provides more protection for its wetlands and water resources than most other communities in the state. The social consequences of allowing the 0.30 acres of wetland fill may include the incremental diminution of: the scenic value associated with the complete preservation of the resource sites, the quality of life related to the protection of wetland wildlife habitat, the urban design and open space values associated with full preservation, and the educational value associated with complete protection. • To the extent that the wetland fill decreases the scenic, wildlife habitat, open space, and educational values associated with the three wetland sites, then there are adverse social consequences associated with allowing the proposed vegetation removal and fill. • • • Most of the 0.30 acres of wetland impact occurs to the wetland located along the western edge of the Fowler School athletic fields. The area impacted is the fringe of mowed and disturbed wetlands. It is infeasible to avoid this impact by moving this path segment further away or to the other side of the creek. This is due to the existing sports field use on the one side and to the wetland boundary being located within the backyard lawn areas of six residential lots on the other. The other areas impacted are the narrowest sections of two lineal wetlands, each of which crosses the route of the pathway and cannot be avoided by the re- routing the trail. The impact to the wetland within Segment 4 potentially could be avoided by moving the trail alignment to the upland on the other side of the creek. However, this is neither practicable nor less detrimental, because the area between the top of bank and the existing industrial uses on this side is narrow and steep and would require much of the path to be located to within a few feet of the top-of-bank. An additional obstacle to moving the path is that one of the two owners of land within the area under discussion has refused to consider allowing access for the trail. The social benefits of allowing the 0.30 acres of wetland fill relate to outdoor recreation and to the improved accessibility the trail would provide. The trail would provide a reasonably direct route through the center of the city for long or short trips. It also would provide a more direct and safer walking route for many of the children who walk to Fowler Middle School. Tiedeman Avenue is the main walking route of the middle school-aged children living north of the school. This street functions as a major collector, but includes a sidewalk on only one side of half its length. Two-way traffic volumes are in the 7,000 ADT range. This creates a dangerous situation for school children and other pedestrians. The proposed greenway path segments connecting to the school will provide a much safer walking route than presently is available. Lastly, to the extent the trail project is consistent with the 40-mile loop regional trail plan, it also will meet regional social needs. Environmental Consequences In general, the typical environmental consequences of allowing a trail to disturb wetland sites are related to the incremental loss of wildlife habitat as well as degradation of other wetland functions and values. Placement of fill for a trail will eliminate wetland vegetation. Even without wetland fill, a trail will generate significant levels of human activity and will degrade wetland habitat values. Examples of these disturbing uses include wildlife harassment by unleashed dogs and off trail uses. Illegal trash dumping and littering also occurs along trails. Trash can pollute water, harm wildlife and provide a seed source for non- native intrusive plants. Restricting a trail would keep human activity to a minimum. 8 • • Although, to a greater or lesser extent these typical human impacts apply to the present project, the physical design of the trail segments poses very limited disturbance to the existing vegetation. It avoids all forested and most scrub- shrub areas, with the exception of the two Oregon ash trees needed to be removed for the bridge over Fanno Creek in Segment 4, Woodard Park to Grant Street. The majority of the wetland impacts occur to emergent (and in some areas mowed lawn grass) wetlands. The impact to riparian vegetation is very limited. Regarding maintaining existing hydrology where the alignment crosses wetlands, the trail as designed provides very little disturbance to existing hydrology for two reasons: 1) most impact areas are located near the outside edge of wetland, • where little or no disruption to the wetland's hydrology occurs, and 2) the trail passes surface water hydrology adequately by surface sheet flow of water over the top of the trail, since the trail is set at grade. A boardwalk is proposed for two areas, the impact area east of the bridge included in Segment 4, Woodard Park to Grant St., so that actual fill can be avoided (this area was still calculated to be fill) and on the Dolan property just south of Main Street where the trail is constrained between the top-of-bank and an existing building. The acquisition of the wetland and upland area of the proposed trail location on the south side of the creek will allow removal of an undesirable use of the natural area, by no longer storing heavy equipment and vehicles in this area, and allow for clean-up of this disturbed urban wetland. An additional goal of the trail through this section is to connect with the existing ramp up to Grant Street. Re- routing the trail to the other side of the creek in order to avoid the wetland is not feasible because the path route would traverse a very steep slope immediately upslope of a wetland and Fanno Creek and would come very close to exiting industrial buildings. Moreover, the owner of one of the two parcels on this side of the creek is opposed to granting access for the trail. Segment 5, Grant Street to Main Street, is constrained by existing buildings (the Woodard Apartments) and topography (existing berm located very near an oxbow of Fanno Creek). Near Grant Street, the vegetation impact from the trail located within 30 feet of the creek is mainly to Himalayan blackberry. The alignment minimizes riparian impact by preserving existing trees. The trail is close to the creek at the oxbow, again due to constraints of the building and berm location, and from there connects to the existing trail which is located close to the creek. This area also is constrained, specifically by the George Morlan warehouse. No alternative alignments are present. Segment 6B, Main Street South, is very unfortunately constrained by an existing building on the Dolan property as well as the long political history of"Dolan vs. the City of Tigard". This segment is located within a fixed easement purchased from A-Boy and it is not possible to be re-routed. No easements are currently present on the other side of Fanno Creek, which in any case also contains an 9 • • existing commercial building sited close to the creek (eighteen feet at the narrowest point), and the owner is opposed to granting access to the Main Street portion of his property. Energy Consequences There appear to be no positive energy consequences of prohibiting the proposed wetland fill. Rather, the energy consequences of allowing the fill are overwhelmingly positive. They include reduced oil consumption and reduced reliance on energy inefficient automobiles. The project will complete a link in the city and regional bicycle . • circulation systems. It will encourage bicycle commuting and bicycle use for recreational purposes by providing connections to neighborhood destinations and commercial and industrial land uses. As future trail extensions and neighborhood connections are completed, the trial system will further help reduce air pollution and reliance on the automobile. Conclusion Based on the evaluation of the resource sites wetland functions and values, and based on the analysis of the environmental, social, economic, and energy consequences of allowing and restricting the conflicting use in question, the conclusion reached is that the City should allow the conflicting use on a limited basis. It should amend the comprehensive plan to allow the 0.30 acres of wetlands fill needed to construct the Fanno Creek trail segments in question. The rationale for this conclusion is that full protection of the three wetland sites, while maintaining existing environmental conditions, but would have important adverse economic and social costs. Full protection would require not connecting the long planned trail. Avoiding the wetland sites would require cost prohibitive boardwalk construction in addition to that already proposed or the re-routing of portions of the trail onto the street and leaving gaps and missing links in the trail corridor. The trail's social and energy benefits of providing outdoor recreation and improved accessibility clearly outweigh its wetland impacts. Providing a reasonably direct route through the center of the city for long or short trips and helping to reduce air pollution and reliance on the automobile are important social benefits that carry out Comprehensive Plan transportation and recreation policies and goals. . • The impact to riparian vegetation is very limited and again, one of the values of the urban Fanno Creek Greenway is to provide recreational, aesthetic, and educational opportunities for people. A counter balancing environmental benefit of allowing the fill is that the wetlands involved are of limited value (the mowed 10 O • wetlands along the sports fields) and will be mitigated by the enhancement of a portion of the better quality wetlands on the school site. Title 3 1 n 1998, Metro Council adopted performance standards for the protection of streams, wetlands, and floodplains, called Title 3 of the Functional Plan. Tigard and the other jurisdictions within Metro are required to amend their comprehensive plans and develop codes to address these new standards by January 1, 2000. In addition to Title 3, Metro has adopted a model ordinance that provides approved examples of provisions that can be used by jurisdictions to comply with Title 3 performance standards. Although the City has not as yet adopted Title 3 compliance measures, the Metro attorney has determined that local comprehensive plan amendments related to water quality and flood management must comply with Title 3 as it stands during the period before ' adoption and acceptance of such measures. Since only the model ordinance, and not Title 3, contains standards for pathways, these are followed in this application in order to address the question of the present proposal's consistency with Title 3. The applicable portion of the Model Ordinance is Section 1.5 "Walkways and bike paths". This section reads as follows: b. A paved walkway or bike path shall not be constructed closer- than 10 feet from the boundary of the Protected Water Feature. For any paved walkway or bike path, the width of the Water Quality Resource Area must be increased by a distance equal to the width of the path. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation. Where practicable, a maximum of 10 percent of the trail may be within 30 feet of the Protected Water Feature; and c. A walkway or bike path shall not exceed 10 feet in width. The trail alignment was developed based in part on the avoidance of significance natural resources and maintenance of the 10% standard specified in the model ordinance. However, due to development along the creek and the extent of wetlands within the floodplain, aligning the trail to meet the 10% standard proved impracticable. According to the attached chart, as presently designed, 33% of the trail including paved and boardwalk portions, is within 30 feet of water resource boundaries. The reasons for this amount of encroachment and the consideration given to alternative alignments that could reduce this impact are detailed in the ESEE 11 • . analysis section of this report. To recapitulate briefly, Segment 2 is constrained by the sports field location. Segment 4 is constrained by the need to cross the creek bend and the configuration of the wetland within the greenway area. Segment 5, Grant Street to Main Street, is constrained by existing buildings (the Woodard Apartments) and the existing berm, which is located very near an oxbow of Fanno Creek, and also by the need to connect to the existing trail, which is close to the creek. Segment 6B, Main Street South, is constrained by an existing building on the Dolan property. In each case, no alternative alignments are present. Although the alignment exceeds the 10% s tandard, the trail poses very limited disturbance to the existing vegetation and has avoided all forested and most scrub-shrub areas, with the exception of the two Oregon ash trees needed to be removed for the bridge over Fanno Creek in Segment 4. In order to compensate for the removal of riparian vegetation, however limited, and to enhance the vegetation along the creek, a specific planting plan for two highly disturbed sites of 0.83 and 0.78 acres, respectively, has been prepared (see attached). The planting plans are designed to meet the Title 3 baseline standard of 80% groundcover and 50% tree canopy using non-nuisance planting from the Native Plant List. Construction drawings for this work are under preparation. This proposed upland re-vegetation work is in addition to the mitigation required by wetland fill permit conditions. As a result of these two projects, the net effect of the trail project will be to improve the overall biological conditions of the riparian area along Fanno Creek. In addition to City of Tigard engineering staff, the qualified professionals who contributed to this project include David Evans and Associates, Fishman Environmental Services, and Percival Associates. David Evans and Associates conducted a topographic and tree survey of the project area. Fishman Environmental Services completed a wetland delineation and mitigation plan, plus an existing conditions assessment of the project area by trail segment. Percival Associates provided planting plans for the two upland areas adjacent to the creek (attached). Topographic, tree survey, wetland, and debris and noxious materials information is depicted in the base maps accompanying this report. The implementation schedule, including timeline for construction, mitigation, mitigation maintenance, monitoring, reporting and contingency plans are included in the reports. These timelines are subject to right-of-way negotiations and the timing of the necessary permits and approvals. /Irpn/d r/trail.selands.ap 12 ,► a 11111111 PAM naltt&*#lib-- iiplIP1 % : ...../ I I ♦� i „1111116 1p■■� a � ��, ■.► ♦111111111116 A1141 /AI ■ ‘ 11111 sualmirmall MI 1174%**14;* 4•4' ,,of:4,1%''' ''::',,,, 4#44'41. 44 milli rfiril , /Bar 1111 11#4, ‘ 4 ::?'' • 4.,Ito WINAIM1 ME MI.... W '41I(m /3 r� �. #1kS***►� ,♦� �♦ I s ■1 11... . 7 ♦ �� ♦ s * 0 ,41, . s o %0 . .4 .■ s • 0,‘ • • .,,, sci,„:7„,:.1., ow , I II 44 it?Pi .AS ,4 4 s.., ,44# * S"..A.***0 . wIrti.1 i■.4 oi 1 i,,I . _ iiii, v/ • S * %AV -AUL,: / gdi . ,,,00,, ,,w ii, -1. AL 44.1. 'mgPir_7.illIl d L. ...0.43,,tiv: Ito A • 1p 4 44V ' ■14tet;NA SUM& s0 h 4,/ , , i nvi usvoir.:a.*:,,,, ...40.04w. " 7/114 1 El diri,sg,Alli v.* All f \ 1" mot,*,,,ifo'-',,15tv.r,., ma wo.4w,; ;Sgria■to Amill•a* . # * iii -44 * ipj ve Tior,,,,,',,,,:;, -i::--- . - ■ i *44., , . ._:,- . Nip . . „i.:',i ;,t,.,„ ..,..--, . 44,.. mil .1 IN :,:,:.$5 :fai: mei lb. # , . , __ e' Ird 0 ':i'°11„ijete ..... wk. Nalimarti 1 ...„ omi L'Aik: It 4 IN l':2::4k ■ low Immig ■ ge 'aim" arikk A* Affiliiimmo atimitat mi., _ „.„,„:„L,,,,,„„,„, - - ' mom I. .,1, milif411111101 . art i,_:, ..... f,,,,,,,,,,,,„,...„ ,. ,,, .,,,,,:„. ,,,p,....,,,,,, , ,,,,,,,,:,,,, in sammiiii 6, Aesti,../1111111 wiammemullio : . Ell alb . , 71"1-, AtiiiiiieL';';':;'4LEttigoiiq, - sew ♦ "AEI HH ma ME 111111111 mil MI • • • • City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard OR 97223 //H4���111 ,�� �I i\ Phone(503)639-4171 �''"' ,J I 1 Fax: (503)684-7298 Letter of Transmittal Transmitted By: Date April 14, 1999 Project# 260B-F ® Mail Project:. Fanno Creek Trails-Segment 1,2,3,4,5,6A,6B ❑ Will Call ❑ Other To' Mirth Walker a�:• Address,,A`.w Fishman Environmental$Services rfs &-434.1VW 6tilAv ue Suite:304 Portland, OR-W209 We are Sending you... Transmitted... ❑ Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ For Approval ❑ Specifications ® Plans ® As Requested ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Samples n For Your Use ❑ Change Order ❑ Other Comment • #of Copies Description 7 11 x 17 layout of Fanno Creek Trail - Segments 1,2,3,4,5,6A,6B showing Wetland impacts 1 Calculations for 30' buffer impact areas 1 Calculations for wetland areas (previously sent September 24, 1998) Items Are... ® Attached El Under Separate Cover via Remarks: Attached are preliminary plans of the Fanno Creek Trails indicating locations where the trail impacts both the wetland areas and areas within a 30' buffer of the wetland boundary. From: j7 l/nnie Nguyen x375 Karleen Aichele x379 • • 4/19/99 Wetland Impacts due to Fanno Creek Trails SEGMENT I PATS.F.REA I IMPACT LOIOATION BUFFER WETLAND' I TOTAL 1 9243 10+00 to 14+50 4215 0 4,215 0 4,215 2 26169 15+00 to 17+75 2735 20+75 to 21+30 644 24+50 to 25+50 328 13+50 to 16+50 4500 17+75 to 22+25 6750 3,707 11,250 14,957 3 22147 20+00 to 20+50 : 438 23+75 to 24+50 823 1,261 0 1,261 4 16815 12+75 to 12+25 861 13+75 to 14+25 382 14+25 to 14+50 337 15+00 to 17+00 390 19+00 to 19+25 392 19+25 to 20+00 447 20+25 to 21+25 612 14+25 to 14+33 120 14+75 to 15+50 1125 16+75 to 17+25 750 3,421 1,995 5,416 5 10755 11+75 to 13+25 1463 . 1,463 0 1,463 6A 7350 10+75 to 12+50 2082 13+00 to 14+90 1621 0 3,703 0 3,703 6B 3000. 0- 0 0" 95,479 8,122 7,500 31,015 Percentage of combined wetland and buffer impact 33% • •• Wetland Impact Area Calculations Summary Existing Ground = Surface Area (not including shoulder) /• v.`�� \` = Surface Area (including shoulder) Finish Grade B = Softdesk Calculated Volumes 1' 0.9167' 0 = Path Structure Section 12.5' AVG Segment 2: Stal3+50 to 16+50 (300') Sta 17+75 to 22+25 (450') Totals Al = 3000 SF Al =4500 SF Al =7500 SF A2 =4500 SF A2 =6750 SF A2= 11250 SF Bcut= 31 CY Bcut= 21 CY Bcut= 52 CY Bfill =64 CY 'Bfill =45CY Bfill= 109 CY C= 127CY C = 191CY C =318CY Segment 3: No Impact Segment 4: Sta 14+25 to 14+33(8') Sta 14+75 to 15+50(75') Sta 16+75 to 17+25 (50') Al =80 SF Al = 750 SF Al = 500 SF A2.= 120 SF A2 = 1125 SF A2 =750 SF Bcut=0.03 CY Bcut= 0.14 CY Bcut= 0 CY Bfill = 0.88 CY Bfill= 18 CY Bfill =42 CY C= 3CY C = 32CY C = 21 CY Sta 19+50 to 19+75 Totals Bridge Construction Al =.1330 SF (Temporary Impact) A2= 1995 SF Bcut=0.17 CY Bfill= 61 CY C = 56 CY Segment 5: No Impact Segment 6B: No Impact • • Seeded with Native Grasses _ r - , J l ( ( A/`' and Planted with Native Shrubs J to Cover 30%-50%of Area ii'Li--) 7' '-�- k ,� a��o Ctee li Oregon Ash ��i//./,, , l r . . , k �. -15 i i Native V/k1 \ , e Willows Planted Along Bank of Creek /�`_ t... ,1 ;� Q �►�� /L;,'0 Eradicate Blackbe /�/� . � , e m Restoration Are . , e∎ )4',/,,. . ,N. Ponderosa Pin . t\ e■ - ,Vc) ./ , \ — 9 0 e ,,, > , . ,'Ik-, :::*- - ' SI ` I\ , ,,,y .. ..,.� Black Hawthoi ■ /\., . i *It' + _ ', IVO i. .1 N.. I . k Pefr --- k f , . ,,... ,- „.. , ,..„,,,,;,. ,...,... a ‘1 \., " / ,/ii;'-'' ' '' . ,///,,145:. , ) -7, :.7,-,- ,,; -■ :, , __ . \11-1,v. , A/fr,: •- ) , Existing As Woodland As h� —'4,ic it; 5-"d,‘,, ,,,,,,.- ��k� fi. 1 t. _ yf /' Qa1e :. Douglas Fir v )► lawn �O'r= r . ..� - -. fi* . .. • • • : .. Imams&Johnson Street Apartments I. Fanno Creek Vegetation Restoration Project City of Tigard May 1999 (Figure 2) 1 no scale . Seeded with NIP Grasses • and Planted with Native Shrubs to Cover 30%-50%of Area footbridge Native Willows Planted / ,�j� Along Bank of Creek i = fir., ,��I``, Oda'%'� (Ate; `? `.. .___ /�/, t \ 1QUO. i i `17 S\ ; -= ."0 liw °, u� I � Western Red Cedar % - �_ !. :.:>� / Oregon Ash �. r�� . I :( , _ 1 ,bbe#7.0 ie' - s-rt..' • . .)- - (' .".",‘ ' it;. " ' ..' -A, • ,_2,1 .. :7* 0 / ' .. . ,4: (. ( • %rat Existing Ash Woodland 3'//�,/ i <<►-„ i , s X"..k- I ,� ' I� . . 4 Lys. `• ri i •1 y!G r, /A- t i > ' /�, r . qtr _ Eradicate Blackberries .-- in Restoration Area 1- Cr/ , co ° 1north Fanno Creek Vegetation Restoration Project City of Tigard May 1999 ' (Figure 1) no scale EXHIBIT A • a^-- tita'.• ,s "j:S :- -%g,�,>,` w"�`3✓" ; a r: iTAFF REPORT!:7- 2 - �.:a,. 7 `01THE PLANNING COMMISSION ..x' •r - � -� a..•„ '� �` e..Sv - CRY OF TIOARD- FOByC"THE CIT1T/OF TIGARD;_OREGON ; ca ,;�,ty� %,i :';f;','4' iii: a E�s e �f$ e s x �zr.5 ;7,47j,, E'A7€ ;• , ; .:> r p ° bPJV itieLt:';<;= x :»s" .Y",'y:. ",,e"c'+ :a5sa:s ..wyzry'„�i,:,.. �r - ''r .°.fa• S f1T - "^- _ y.�• 4', °ice>i'';, p`f''f�Mp,•iyi:x, e:°fd*` 5�.. `-�ii� .. �„>•.�:� , .,,rr» °a,. ��S>:a. - ,... . ,m ...,g._ - '�%.... .- .r.: - ,u... . .s„z.,rre.,, .�.s.. - .�`,_ 120 DAYS = N/A SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment CPA 1999-00001 Sensitive Lands Review SLR 1999-00003 PROPOSAL: The City, as applicant, requests consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to remove the Water Resources Overlay from small portions of three wetlands to allow construction of segments of the multi- modal Fanno Creek Greenway trail between SW.Tigard Street and•the SW Ash Avenue, Extension. The combined area included within the wetland fills in question is approximately. 0.30 acres. As part of this same application, the City requests Sensitive Lands approval for trail improvements within the 100-year floodplain and Title 3: Water Quality, Flood Management,,and Fish and Wildlife Conservation approval for a conditional use within the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone. APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: City of Tigard Attn: Duane Roberts, Project Planner 13125 SW Hall Boulevard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 • Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential, Industrial, Central Business District. ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5, IP and CBD. LOCATION: Fanno Creek Greenway between Tigard Street and Ash Avenue Extension. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3 Model Ordinance. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff. proposes that.the.Planning Commission. recommend APPROVAL to the City Council ; CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 1 OF 13 • for:the above.request subject to certain Conditions of°Approval. The proposed findings and conclusions;on which the recommendation is based are noted in Section IV. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -: =,THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS'SHALL BE%SATISF,IED:', 1. Submit a copy of the permit approval from the Division of State Lands and US Army Corps of Engineers. 2. Install erosion control measures prior to construction. Erosion control measures may not be removed until construction has been completed. 3. Any fill placed within the floodplain shall be offset by an equal amount of excavation elsewhere within the floodplain portion of the project area. 4. Upon completion of construction, the Water Quality Resource Area shall be restored and maintained in accordance with the mitigation plan and specifications contained in Table 2 of the Title 3 Model Ordinance. 5. To the extent practicable, during construction existing vegetation shall be protected and left in place. Work area shall be carefully located and marked to reduce potential damage to the Title 3 Water Quality Resource Area. Trees in .the Water Quality Resource Area shall not be used as anchors for stabilizing construction equipment. 6. Where existing vegetation is removed during construction, or the original land contours disturbed, the site shall be revegetated, and the vegetation shall be established as soon as practicable. Nuisance plants, as identified in the Metro Native Plant List, may be removed at any time. Interim erosion control measures such as mulching shall be used to avoid erosion on bare areas. Nuisance plants shall be replaced with non-nuisance plants by the next growing season. • 7. Prior to construction, the Water Quality Resource Area shall be flagged, fenced or otherwise marked and shall remain undisturbed, except as may be required to complete the proposed trail improvements. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1983. The Comprehensive Plan includes a bicycle/pedestrian trail element that calls for a bikeway along Fanno Creek. The Comprehensive Plan and 1987 Tigard Park Plan identify the Fanno Creek bikepath as a continuous, off-street path that follows the route of Fanno Creek as it flows between the northern and southern city limits. Between the 1980's and mid-1990's, new development in the area of the Fanno Creek Greenway was conditioned to provide the bikepath as conceptually identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Within .the boundaries of the present project, bikepaths have been constructed along the streamside edge of the Morlan Plumbing property and under the Pacific Highway bridge connecting to Main Street. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL. PAGE 2 OF 13 • • In order to add more specificity to the Comprehensive Plan designation, in 1997 the City conducted a technical study, with extensive public participation, to map the alignment of the trail from Tiedeman to Durham Road. In designating the most appropriate route, the study considered wetlands, soils, vegetation, wildlife, and topography within the greenway corridor as well as various social factors, such as neighborhood and employment locations. Vicinity Information and Proposal Description: The land uses along the two sides of the trail corridor consist of a school sports field, industrial development, commercial development, and older single-family residential development on 7,500 square foot lots. The boundary of the Greenway Corridor is coterminous with the floodplain. Over the years, significant encroachment and fill has occurred within the greenway Corridor, which is located within an older part of the City. With the exception of parts of three segments, the proposed trail segments consist of a 10-foot-wide paved pathway with two feet of shoulder on either side. This width is consistent with regional and state standards for the Fanno Creek Trail and is designed to provide for the safe passage of two bicycles approaching in opposite directions. The five segments are, from north to south: Segment 2: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (Fowler School Site) Wetland Impact Area: 11,250 square feet (SF) (750 linear,feet); 52 cubic yards ' (CY) excavation; 427 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Summer Creek Segment 3: Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park (Woodard Park Site) Segment 4: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue Wetland Impact Area: 1,995 SF (133 linear feet); 0.17 CY excavation; 117 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Segment 5: Grant Avenue to Main Street Segment 6b: Main Street South Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Total Wetland Impact Area: 13,245 SF (0.30 acre) or 833 linear feet of trail; 52.17 CY removal and 544 CY fill Three bridges are part of the project, and will span Fanno Creek (twice) and Summer Creek from top-of-bank to top-of-bank. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND PROPOSED FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: CHAPTER 18.775, SENSITIVE LANDS Section 18.775.020.0 states that landform alterations or developments which are only within wetland areas that meet the jurisdictional requirements and permit criteria of CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 3 OF 13 • the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Division of State Lands, Unified Sewerage Agency, and/or other federal, state, or regional agencies. do not require a sensitive lands permit. The City shall require that all necessary permits from other agencies are obtained. All other applicable City requirements must be satisfied, including sensitive land permits for areas within the "100-year floodplain, slopes of 25% or greater or unstable ground, drainageways, and wetlands that are not under state or federal jurisdiction. The proposal will impact wetlands that are under state and federal jurisdiction and, therefore, do not require sensitive lands review. Permit requirements of state agencies are addressed elsewhere within this report. The Water Resources overlay is applicable to the wetlands impacted by this project and is addressed elsewhere in this report. Floodplain impacts are addressed below. Section 18.775.020.E.2 states that sensitive lands permits shall be required in the 100- year floodplain when any of the following circumstances apply: •. Ground disturbance(s) or landform alterations in all floodway areas; • Ground disturbance(s) or landform alterations in floodway fringe locations involving more than 50 cubic yards of material; • Repair, reconstruction, or improvement of an existing structure or utility, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure prior to the improvement or the damage requiring reconstruction provided no development occurs in the floodway; • Structures intended for human habitation; and • Accessory structures which are greater than 528 square feet in size, outside of floodway areas. The proposal includes ground disturbance involving more than 50 cubic yards of material in the floodway fringe. Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) 183.120 defines "floodway fringe" as the area of the floodplain outside the floodway area. Therefore, sensitive lands review is required for this project. Section 18.775.070.B provides that an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: • Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge; The project engineer has determined that the proposed project will preserve the floodplain storage capacity of the portion of Fanno Creek within the project area, that the zero-foot rise floodway will not be disturbed, and that the project will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 4 OF 13 • . Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the Comprehensive Plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.120 of the Community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards; The land within the project area is zoned R-4.5, IP, and CBD. Landform alternation is permitted in areas designated as commercial or industrial. The proposed use is community recreation and, as such, is an exception to the prohibition on landform alteration within residentially designated zones. • Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100- year flood The applicant has proposed to offset the proposed floodplain fill with an equal amount of excavation within the 100-year floodplain, so that the proposed alteration will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year floodplain. • r • The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as untimely; The proposed alteration is a pedestrian/bicycle pathway project that carries out the 'City pathway plan and the policies and objectives of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. • The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood; The applicant proposes to locate the pathway above the elevation of an average annual flood. • The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained; and The approval of the Division of State Lands has been obtained. A copy of the project permit has been provided to the City. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approval is pending. • Where landform alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area,within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The proposal under consideration carries out the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 5 OF 13 • PROPOSED FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Planning Commission recommends City Council find that the proposal satisfies the approval criteria for landform alterations within the 100-year floodplain. WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (18.797.080) This Chapter has standards for sites identified as significant on the Tigard Wetlands and Stream Corridors Map. The standards identify Fanno Creek as a Major Stream, which requires a 50-foot setback from top-of-bank or the upland edge of associated wetlands. Table 18.797.2 identifies water related recreation facilities and trails as a "Type I allowed use with mitigation" within the riparian setback area. However, any landform alteration within wetlands in the Water Resource overlay is prohibited. Section 18.797.140 states that in order to develop within wetlands, a Comprehensive Plan amendment is required. This section addresses the applicable criteria for construction of the trail in the riparian setback area and for the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Section 18.797.060.A states that, for Type I uses, the applicant shall prepare a plan that demonstrates that the use will be constructed and located so as to minimize grading, native vegetation removal, and the area necessary for the use. The Director may require additional information where necessary to determine WR district boundaries or to mitigate identified impacts from a proposed development, including but not limited to: • Site survey as prescribed in Section 18.797.060B; The applicant has submitted a site survey completed by certified land surveyors. • One or more of the reports described in Section 18.797.060D. The applicant has submitted a topographic survey as conducted by David Evans and Associates along with a technical study prepared by Fishman and Associates addressing the vegetation removal and grading associated with the proposed and alternative trail alignments. The proposed alignment minimizes natural vegetation removal and grading to the maximum extent consistent with trail safety. The applicant also has provided a wetland delineation study covering the project area, as well as a wetland mitigation plan. Alternative sites are limited due to the intended location of the trail adjacent to Fanno Creek and the location of the existing trail system. Segment 2, Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue, has unavoidable wetlands within the project area. Beginning at Tigard Street, the trail is routed outside the wetland boundary and crosses the unavoidable portion of the wetland near its narrowest section. The trail then skirts the edge of the wetland and the edge of the playing field and associated equipment (fitness course signs, workout equipment stations, and ballfield backstop) and impacts. only a narrow fringe of mowed and disturbed wetland. All Oregon Ash trees on the north side of Fanno and Summer Creeks are avoided, and only emergent wetland is impacted. The bridge crosses Summer Creek where no adjacent wetlands are present, and then joins with Tiedeman Avenue to connect with Segment 3. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 6 OF 13 • • Segment 3, Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands in the park, as well as an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) mitigation area north of the park. Segment 4, Woodard Park to Grant Avenue: The trail skirts above the wetland boundary where possible, impacting a narrow fringe of emergent wetland on the north side of Fanno Creek. The trail runs in an upland area on the south side of Fanno Creek and then crosses a narrow neck of unavoidable emergent wetland, avoiding forested wetland areas. Trail alignment is constrained through this segment due to steep upland slopes on the north side of Fanno Creek; the trail has to cross a backwater emergent area on the south side of Fanno Creek to connect with the paved ramp up to Grant Avenue. Impacts to the backwater wetland area are avoided by constructing a boardwalk bridge across the wetland area, with piers in the upland (top-of-bank to top-of-bank). Segment 5, Grant Avenue to Main Street avoids wetlands. The trail alignment has been routed outside of the wetland area; it connects with an existing concrete walk located north of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Main Street. Segment 6b, Main Street South: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands, and a large section of the proposed trail on the east side of Fanno Creek was abandoned due to the extensive amount of wetlands present. A part of the trail in this section is a boardwalk, to raise the trail up and avoid excessive fill (in uplands) near the top-of-bank of Fanno Creek. In this segment, the location of the bridge crossing Fanno Creek was constrained by the City's easements on the adjoining properties (and by construction of a new building south of Main Street on the east side of Fanno Creek). The trail continues in upland on the west side of Fanno Creek to connect with the existing paved pathway. A southern portion of this trail segment connects to the Ash Street right-of-way, avoiding wetlands on both sides of the trail. The wetlands along the trail alignment have been delineated and described in two wetland delineation reports prepared by Fishman Environmental Services (FES) in the spring of 1998. The two impact areas are described below: The northernmost impact area is in Segment 2, on the Fowler School site owned by the Tigard-Tualatin School District. The trail skirts a broad flood plain of Fanno Creek dominated by reed canarygrass and meadow foxtail, and crosses a narrow neck of the wetland that extends away from the floodplain area (this wetland neck extends upslope to the west, off-site to a wetland seep area). The trail then impacts a narrow grassy fringe of emergent wetland east of the school ball field and west of an Oregon Ash wetland forest that is immediately adjacent to Fanno Creek. Part of this wetland area is regularly mowed as lawn associated with the ball field. Soils in the floodplain area were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silty clay loam, with no redox concentrations to 6 inches, over a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) stiff clay, with brown (10YR 5/3) redox concentrations to a depth of 16 inches. Soils in an upslope position near the crossing of the wetland neck were a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) silty clay loam to 16 inches, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations, and gray (10YR 5/1) depletions at 14 inches. The floodplain receives high-water over-bank flows from Fanno Creek and has a high groundwater table. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 7 OF 13 • • The other segment with wetland impacts is Segment 4, north of Grant Avenue. The trails passes through an emergent meadow associated with the floodplain of Fanno Creek. Bentgrass and Reed dominate the meadow area Canarygrass, and has soils that were a very dark grayish brown and dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2 and 4/2) sandy silt loam, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations and dark gray (5Y 4/1) depletions in the surface 10 inches. The soils had a compacted hardpan at 10 inches, possibly disturbed from previous sewer line construction. The second wetland crossing in this segment occurs on the opposite (south) side of Fanno Creek, where the trail crosses a narrow finger of sparsely-vegetated, disturbed wetland dominated by Climbing Nightshade and Red-Osier Dogwood, with Himalayan Blackberry on the slopes. The trail avoids the surrounding Oregon Ash and Red Alder trees near the trail. Water quality in this backwater area appears to have been negatively impacted by trash and debris. Section 18.797.140 requires the following criteria to be addressed to allow the proposed fill and mitigation of wetlands designated on the City's Significant Water Resources map: The analysis shall consider the Environmental, Social, Economic and Energy (ESEE) consequences of allowing the proposed conflicting use fully, consider both the impacts on the specific resource site in comparison with other comparable sites within the Tigard Planning Area; The ESEE analysis must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Tigard City Council that the adverse economic consequences of not allowing the conflicting use are sufficient to justify the loss, or partial loss of the resource; In particular, ESEE analysis must demonstrate why the use cannot be located on buildable land, consistent with the provisions of this chapter, and that there are no other sites within the Tigard Planning area that can meet the specific needs of the proposed use; The Comprehensive Plan calls for a trail through the Fanno Greenway, which is defined as the area co-terminus with the 100-year floodplain. Because of existing development along and within the floodplain and also because two-thirds of the floodplain area is wetlands, very limited locations are available at this time for the retrofitting of the trail within the corridor. A trail located on buildable land outside of the corridor would not be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and, because of creekside development, would have to be designed as an on-street trail. Such a trail would serve a transportation function but would not serve the purposes of a recreational trail as conceptually identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's ESEE analysis demonstrates that the benefits of allowing the trail far outweigh the limited negative consequences associated with its environmental impact. The ESEE analysis shall be prepared by a team consisting of a wildlife biologist or wetlands ecologist and a land use planner or land use attorney, all of whom are qualified in their respective fields and experienced in the preparation of Goal 5 ESEE analysis; CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 8 OF 13 • • In addition to City of Tigard Planning and Engineering Staff, the qualified professionals who contributed to the ESEE analysis include David Evans and Associates, Fishman Environmental Services, and Percival Associates. David Evans and Associates conducted a topographic and tree survey of the project area. Fishman Environmental Services completed a wetland delineation and mitigation plan, plus an existing conditions assessment of the project area based on the Water Quality Resource Area Requirements table included in the Metro Model Ordinance. Percival Associates provided planting plans for the two upland areas adjacent to the creek. If the application is approved, then . the ESEE analysis shall be incorporated by reference into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and the Tigard Wetland and Stream Corridor Map shall be amended to remove the site from the inventory. PROPOSED FINDING: Based on the analysis above and the applicant's ESEE analysis . incorporated herein by reference, the Planning Commission recommends City Council adopt a finding that the adverse economic, social and energy consequences of not allowing portions of the Fanno Creek trail are sufficient to justify partial loss of the wetland resource. TITLE 3: WATER QUALITY, FLOOD MANAGEMENT AND FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION, MODEL -ORDINANCE CONDITIONAL USE REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.F 1n 1998, Metro Council adopted performance standards for the protection of streams, wetlands, and floodplains, called Title 3 of the Functional Plan. Tigard and the other jurisdictions within 'Metro are required to amend 'their Comprehensive Plans and develop codes to address these new standards by January 1, 2000. In addition to Title 3, Metro has adopted a model ordinance that provides approved examples of provisions that can be used by jurisdictions to comply with Title 3 performance standards. Although the City has not as yet adopted Title 3 compliance measures, the Metro attorney has determined that local Comprehensive Plan amendments related to water quality and flood management must comply with Title 3 as it stands during the period before adoption and acceptance of such measures. Since only the model ordinance, and not Title 3, contains standards for pathways, these are followed in this application in order to address the present proposal's consistency with Title 3. The applicable portion of the Model Ordinance is Section 1.5 "Walkways and bike paths". This section states as follows: b. A paved walkway or bike path shall not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the Protected Water Feature. For any paved walkway or bike path, the width of the Water Quality Resource Area must be increased by a distance equal to the width of the path. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation. Where practicable, a maximum of 10 percent of the trail may be within 30 feet of the Protected Water Feature; and c. A walkway or bike path shall not exceed 10 feet in width. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 9 OF 13 • • The trail alignment was developed based in part on the avoidance of significance natural resources and maintenance of the 10% standard specified in the model ordinance. However, due to development along the .creek and the extent of wetlands within the floodplain, aligning the trail to meet the 10% standard proved impracticable. According to the applicant's submittal, as presently designed, 29% of the trail including paved and boardwalk portions, is within 30 feet of water resource boundaries. The reasons for this amount of encroachment and the consideration given to alternative alignments that could reduce this impact are detailed in the ESEE analysis section of this report. To recapitulate briefly, Segment 2 is constrained by the sports field location. Segment 4 is constrained by the need to cross the creek bend and the configuration of the wetland within the greenway area. Segment 5, Grant Street to Main Street, is constrained by existing buildings (the Woodard Apartments) and the existing berm, which is located very near an oxbow of Fanno Creek, and also by the need to connect to the existing trail, which is close to the creek. Segment 6B, Main Street South, is constrained by an existing building on the Dolan property. In each case, no alternative alignments are present. Although the alignment exceeds the 10% standard, the trail poses very limited disturbance to the existing vegetation and has avoided all forested and most scrub-shrub areas, with the exception of the two Oregon Ash trees that need to be removed for the bridge over Fanno Creek in Segment 4. In order to compensate for the removal of riparian vegetation, however limited, and to enhance the vegetation along the creek, the applicant has provided a specific planting plan for two highly disturbed sites of 0.83 and 0.78 acres. The proposed planting plans satisfy the Title 3 baseline .standard of 80% groundcover and 50% tree canopy using non-nuisance planting from the Native Plant List. This proposed upland re-vegetation work is in addition to the mitigation required by wetland fill permit conditions. As a result of these two projects, the net effect of the trail project will be to improve the overall biological conditions of the riparian area along Fanno Creek. In addition to City of Tigard Engineering Staff, the qualified professionals who contributed to this project included David Evans and Associates, Fishman Environmental Services, and Percival Associates. David Evans and Associates conducted a topographic and tree survey of the project area. Fishman Environmental Services completed a wetland delineation and mitigation plan, plus an existing conditions assessment of the project area. Percival Associates provided planting plans for the two upland areas adjacent to the creek (attached). Topographic, tree survey, wetland, and debris and noxious materials information is depicted in the base maps accompanying this report. The implementation schedule, including timeline for construction, mitigation, mitigation maintenance, monitoring, reporting and contingency plans are included in the reports. These timelines are subject to right-of-way negotiations and the timing of the necessary permits and approvals. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 10 OF 13 • • PROPOSED FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Planning Commission recommends City Council find that the applicant's plan satisfies the standards of the Metro Title 3 model ordinance relating to Walkways and Bike Paths. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department and Water Department have had an opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. The Operations Utility Department has had an opportunity to review the proposal and has offered the following comments. Because the proposed trail will parallel an existing sewer trunk line, the trail could provide access for sewer line maintenance and emergency repairs. It also could provide improved access for much needed stream bank stabilization projects. As such, the trail surface should be constructed to support the weight of utility vehicles SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and The Unified Sewerage Agency have had an opportunity to review this proposal and offered no comments or objections. The Oregon Division of State Lands has had an opportunity to review the proposal an offered no comments or objections. • The Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development has had an opportunity to review the proposal an offered no comments or objections. The US Army Corps of Engineers has had an opportunity to review the proposal and offered no comments objections. Metro was given an opportunity to comment on the proposal and provided the following comments: Once again, thanks' for taking us on the field trip. We all enjoyed being able to see the alignment first hand and to see that two critical needs, providing trail opportunities and protecting natural resources, are being met. Metro is totally supportive of Tigard's efforts to design and build the portion of the Fanno Creek trail that lies in the City. It is a key segment of the entire trail system from the Willamette Park at John's Landing to the Tualatin River. Overall, the City is proposing a reasonable plan to comply with the Title 3 requirements. As discussed on Friday, below are our comments: When the trail abuts a wetland or is in the vegetated corridor of a stream, where possible or practicable, reduce the area of impact through means such as: CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 11 OF 13 • . r. • Narrowing shoulders (from 2ft to 1ft) with native vegetation and/or grasses • No mowing of the shoulder adjacent to the wetland • Narrowing impervious trail surfaces (from 10ft to 8ft) • Pervious trail surfaces where possible (Gresham is using compacted gravel - call Phil Kidby, Gresham Parks at 612-2530 and Metro is planning to use compacted gravel on the Springwater Corridor Trail - call Dawn Uchiyama, Portland Parks at 823-5596 for more information) • Boardwalks as an alternative along wetlands and at pinch points There are numerous opportunities for restoration of the riparian corridor including removal of non-native, invasive plants and replacing them with native plants. A 3-year plan for . monitoring the success of the restoration projects is recommended. Title 3 requires that any fill added to the floodplain be matched with an equal amount of fill removal to maintain the capacity of the floodplain. Staff Responses: Regarding the necking down of the trail and shoulder, our understanding was that this comment applied to two areas: the wetland area along the edge of the sports field and the portion of the trail alignment located on top of flood control berm. We understood that Metro had no objection to a ten-foot wide trail in the upland areas. In order to avoid user conflicts, we would prefer to build to the state and regional ten-foot standard. City staff is agreeable no mowing of the shoulder adjacent to the sports field wetland. Since the trail route and shoulder is within the existing lawn area, we will need to coordinate with the school district regarding a change to their current practice of mowing the entire sloped area. Pervious surface where possible is a suggestion we have investigated. Other than experimental surfaces and expensive inter-locking pavers, crushed rock appears to be the only feasible alternative surface available. City staff do not view this as an appropriate surface for the Fanno Creek Trail. This is because the trail is intended to be multi- modal, serving pedestrian, bicyclist, wheel chair users, and skaters. Compacted gravel is not suitable for narrow wheeled bikes and roller and in-line skates and is problematic from a maintenance point of view. Therefore, we would prefer to go with an asphalt surface. We plan to use boardwalks.at the two locations we pointed out in the field. . The plan has been revised to include compensatory excavation, as required under Title 3. The excavation will include removal of the overgrown hard surface basketball court and the grubbing out of the blackberries in the area between the flood control berm and creek bank on the Johnson Street Apt. property. The cleared area will be restored with natural vegetation as described in the project proposal. Engineering is doing the.quantity calculations at this time. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 12 OF 13 •� • • To go back, when we visited the apartment property, we incorrectly identified the trail as running on top of the portion of the berm near the bend in the creek. Instead, the trail is proposed to run over and along the apartment side of the berm and within in the lawn area. It then runs up and back over the berm. For handicapped and ramp safety reasons, we would prefer to not narrow down this section of the trail to eight feet. Our engineers believe this width is too narrow relative to the gradient of the trail and would pose a potential safety hazard to trail users Robert Bothman of the Fanno Creek Trail Working Group has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: I have reviewed the amendment and the plans for segments 2, 3,. 4, 5 and 6B. I have visited the segments and support the amendment and plans for these sections. SECTION VII. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS Dewey and Margaret Hamilton have reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: We are retired and walking and riding bicycles along these trails is important to us in maintaining a healthy life style. Being able to walk and ride on a trail with a natural setting rather than a roadway is an important safety feature for us. Ken Tolliver has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: I want you to know that at least one family is 100% behind the needed amendments that your are considering. Access to the trail will increase the exposure of local residents to the natural areas along the creek and. help them to be more connected with it. Please approve the amendment requests. Mike Meredith has reviewed the proposal and provided comments in support of approving the applicant's proposal. June 9, 1999 PREPARED BY: Mark J. Roberts DATE Associate Planner June 9, 1999 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff . DATE Planning Manager i:\Irpl n\duane\fannocreektrail.doc CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 13 OF 13 � =,= � - ;:r��; � ■��06�<a■ NZ r��■ �■ CITY of TIGARD y 41111 . 1.1:1■111:1�'� 1 , �1,�■ III`� ■= �■ii■ 671 NIIII OEOORAFNIC INFORMATION SYSTEM I Isa iirg Alli■ WIN= I No fi',- pi alum WM II MI /`� 1.11 it It���;a ■� �Vi■ 112 lirg._ VICINITY MAP Lel `! �„, An& , m_, dliii ,. :.. 999-00001 IIII Sun ,_ t.�. �_._..,_ �, �� :�i �� CPA l it,1 w'�1�;.; _� CITY OF TIGARD . _ -�I,- .. 'Mr ■■, ri111111►► ...1 • =-� ■ ■■ ■� �.!�►�0� CREEK ��N om` 4111:\.\ 1111*�4� ��,•i�* ;V 'o►� A TRAIL ALIGNMENT wri ���► \ e� `. ` .� vil 16 Sub ect ro erties em• 10441t 1 •�"�� ► !�� ,e� ' �� �j are included In the n� �� ■■ �miri w.∎ ,' �. . '♦ I trail alignment project _ ILI mil :iiiiIpiiiii I l 'a� '♦♦♦.�`�1��, #tea. h �,♦ �• - �;``� , Streams lizzimmal • �.. 1► f '♦ .t �, `� # ♦ ♦ . #I MAJOR 1!101111Wamilin”.0 AII#4. . ■Aw 4.,,�, ,►`� %�,��� �� I \ ��� l- '°F,;'∎ , / . \ / MINOR ����� ���°•Ii=•��` ` t ♦� � ��\\� Tigard Wetland Inv.A 1 NoW41111p P.P;VW ..,&,,,i,ApA.■P1 s4il►i l►� 4♦�, ♦ ♦ ,_'�!►.�.`�'�:.:�■��� � ice �� 1� \����..®_;�; h' S . . - •- iiie°1- minor ♦ .�•elw■• .�. •�♦ : ,\} '\ -'■. 1111 "■■ ■■�,1,., " .•1111.♦.�A.,,,z.*• ` ``` p 100 800 1200 Feet &tji !iiiIi1O ■■—_ ' , . . i e,•\"\i ```L\�� I 1'.858 feel ■ Ir4==i.. . ■ ■ .�4kpsios•0w 4' v e!,**I � asi A IR A 1.111_Il E,�I SAO• .•fr♦rA�Il116`i►�i 1C 6711,. City of Tigard Willa B,l,,,, nu / ,AO(a 4? ■' s- lopmdlouirm. Informa8on on ths mep IE!or pensnl locallon ony end��- ./■■.i�. , .` et , ` =- ', should De verified with the Development SeMoes Division. �.;'- '� . ` . ��, 17125 SW 9 Blvd ,,■■,'1 ", Tl1erd,OR 97227`� ■...■.,'`. ` , y1Na.r.7.1• ,"'�■ ■��� ' (503)879-4171 1 11111 111111111111 '� ?Aso �� ` , htalr«ww.N.89erd.or.ue ■ 'I► . ♦ ``44 IIIl■■■ii■Iam■I■1■G■ ■ II�,� ��1�■��11111� ��1■.....■�..�a_ oln/rlp{e• h0 ,1') It1nn.,'.r ...L,Id EA,'In" n nn Community Develooment • ' • • Project Proposal FANNO CREEK TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS Proposal Summary The City, as applicant, requests consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to remove the Water Resources Overlay from small portions of three wetlands to allow construction of segments of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Greenway trail between SW Tigard Street and the SW Ash Avenue Extension. The combined area included within the wetlandfills in question is approximately 0.30 acre. As part of this same application, the City requests Sensitive Lands approval for trail improvements within the 100-year floodplain and Title 3: Water Quality, Flood Management, and Fish and Wildlife Conservation approval for a conditional use within the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone. Introduction The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1983. The comprehensive plan includes a bicycle/pedestrian trail element that calls for a bikeway along Fanno Creek. The Comprehensive Plan and 1987 Tigard Park Plan identify the Fanno Creek bikepath as a continuous, off-street path that follows the route of Fanno Creek as it flows between the northern and southern city limits. Between the 1980's and mid-1990's, new development in the area of the Fanno Creek Greenway was conditioned to provide the bikepath as conceptually identified in the Comprehensive Plan. In order to add more specificity to the comprehensive plan designation, in 1.997 the city conducted a technical study, with extensive public participation, to map the alignment of the trail from Tiedeman to Durham Road. In designating the most appropriate route, the study considered wetlands, soils, vegetation, wildlife, and topography within the greenway corridor as well as various social factors, such as neighborhood and employment locations. The Fanno Creek trail is part of the Regional Trail System and 40-Mile Loop first identified in the early 1900's. Metro is the government responsible for regional planning and in the 1990s designated the Fanno Creek Greenway Trail as a priority project and promoted a bond measure for acquisition of property and trail construction. To date, regional bond measure funds have been used to purchase two properties, respectively covering seven and eleven acres, within the Tigard portion of the corridor. The present, city-sponsored project includes the construction of five trail sections all located between Tigard Street and Ash Avenue. Along with existing trail sections, these projects will complete approximately two miles of trail inter- ..t • • '• connecting at Scholl's Ferry with 1.6 miles of trail in Beaverton. A total of $460,000 has been allocated for right-of-way acquisition and construction of the pathways. The projects are programmed for construction in 1999. The properties within the Greenway areas proposed for the pathway improvements • are zoned R-4.5, IP, and CBD. The topography generally consists of typical floodplain, with the creek bordered by steep banks and broad floodplain. Approximately two-thirds of the Greenway floodplain within the project area is wetlands. The main benefits of the projects include providing opportunities for healthy, outdoor recreation activities, such as walking, jogging and bicycling; increasing pedestrian and bicycle access through the community; and providing access to the natural environment as a refuge from the stresses of urban life. A 1998 citywide park and open space needs assessment indicates that walking is the most popular recreation activity in the City and that the demand for additional recreational trails is high. Proposal Description The proposed five trail segments consist of a 10-foot wide paved pathway with two feet of shoulder on either side. This width is consistent with regional and state standards for the Fanno Creek Trail and is designed to provide for the • safe passage of two bicycles approaching in opposite directions. The five segments are, from north to south: Segment 2: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (Fowler School Site) Wetland Impact Area: 11,250 SF (750 linear feet); 52 CY excavation; 427 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Summer Creek Segment 3: Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park (Woodard Park Site) Segment 4: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue Wetland Impact Area: 1,995 SF (133 linear feet); 0.17 CY excavation; 117 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Segment 5: Grant Avenue to Main Street Segment 6b: Main Street South Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Total Wetland Impact Area: 13,245 SF (0.30 acre) or 833 linear feet of trail; 52.17 CY removal and 544 CY fill Three bridges are part of the project, and will span Fanno Creek (twice) and Summer Creek from top-of-bank to top-of-bank. Project Impacts and Alternatives Alternative sites are limited due to the intended location of the trail adjacent to Fanno Creek, the location of the existing trail system, and the City's ownership and easement procurement. • 2 • • Segment 2, Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue, has unavoidable wetlands within the project area. Beginning at Tigard Street, the trail is routed outside the wetland boundary and crosses the unavoidable portion of the wetland near It's narrowest section. The trail then skirts the edge of the wetland and the edge of the playing field and associated equipment (fitness course signs, workout equipment stations, and ballfield backstop) and impacts only a narrow fringe of mowed and disturbed wetland. All Oregon ash trees on the north side of Fanno and Summer Creeks are avoided, and only emergent wetland is impacted. The bridge crosses Summer Creek where no adjacent wetlands are present, and then joins with Tiedeman Avenue to connect with Segment 3. Segment 3, Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands in the park as well as an ODOT mitigation area north of the park. Segment 4, Woodard Park to Grant Avenue: The trail skirts above the wetland boundary where possible, impacting a narrow fringe of emergent wetland on the north side of Fanno Creek. The trail runs in an upland area on the south side of Fanno Creek and then crosses a narrow neck of unavoidable emergent wetland, avoiding forested wetland areas. Trail alignment is constrained through this segment due to steep upland slopes on the north side of Fanno Creek; the trail has to cross a backwater emergent area on the south side of Fanno Creek to connect with the paved ramp up to Grant Avenue. Impacts to the backwater wetland area are avoided by constructing a boardwalk bridge across the wetland area, with piers in the upland (top-of-bank to top-of-bank). Segment 5, Grant Avenue to Main Street avoids wetlands. The trail alignment • has been routed outside of the wetland area; it connects with an existing concrete walk located north of Pacific Highway and north of Main Street. Segment 6b, Main Street South: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands, and a large section of the proposed trail on the east side of Fanno Creek was scrapped due to the extensive amount of wetlands present. A part of the trail in this section is a boardwalk, to raise the trail up and avoid excessive fill (in uplands) near the top-of-bank of Fanno Creek. In this segment, the location of the bridge crossing Fanno Creek was constrained by the City's easements on the adjoining properties (and by construction of a new building south of Main Street on the east side of Fanno Creek). The trail continues in upland on the west side of Fanno Creek to connect with the existing paved pathway. A southern portion of this trail segment connects to the Ash Street right-of-way, avoiding wetlands on both sides of the trail. In order to minimize construction impacts to the waterway and wetlands, best management erosion control practices (silt fences and biofilter bags, as outlined 3 • • • . in the Unified Sewerage Agency Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans, Technical Guidance Handbook) will be specified in the construction documents prepared by the City of Tigard. Physical and Biological Description of Impacted Wetland Areas The wetlands along the trail alignment have been delineated and described in two wetland delineation reports prepared by Fishman Environmental Services (FES) in the spring of 1998. The two impact areas are described below: The northernmost impact area is in Segment 2, on the Fowler School site owned by the Tigard-Tualatin School District. The trail skirts a broad flood plain of Fanno Creek dominated by reed canarygrass and meadow foxtail, and crosses a narrow neck of the wetland that extends away from • the floodplain area (this wetland neck extends upslope to the west, offsite to a wetland seep area). The trail then impacts a narrow grassy fringe of emergent wetland east of the school ball field and west of an Oregon ash wetland forest that is immediately adjacent to Fanno Creek. Part of this wetland area is regularly mowed as lawn associated with the ball field. Soils in the floodplain area were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silty clay loam, with no redox concentrations to 6 inches, over a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) stiff clay, with brown (10YR 5/3) redox concentrations to a depth of 16 inches. Soils in an upslope position near the crossing of the wetland neck were a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) silty clay loam to 16 inches, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations, and gray (10YR 5/1) depletions at 14 inches. The floodplain receives high-water over-bank flows from Fanno Creek and has a high groundwater table. The other segment with wetland impacts is Segment 4, north of Grant Avenue. The trails passes through an emergent meadow associated with the floodplain of Fanno Creek. The meadow area is dominated by bentgrass and reed canarygrass, and has soils that were a very dark grayish brown and dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2 and 4/2) sandy silt loam, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations and dark gray (5Y 4/1) depletions in the surface 10 inches. The soils had a compacted hardpan at 10 inches, possibly disturbed from previous sewer line construction. The second wetland crossing in this segment occurs on the opposite (south) side of Fanno Creek, where the trail crosses a narrow finger of sparsely-vegetated, disturbed wetland dominated by climbing nightshade and red-osier dogwood, with Himalayan blackberry on the slopes. The trail avoids the surrounding Oregon ash and red alder trees near the trail. Water quality in this backwater area appears to have been negatively impacted by trash and debris. 4 • • • Wetland Mitigation In order to compensate for the unavoidable disturbance of wetlands and meet state and federal mitigation requirements, the City has developed a conceptual mitigation plan, The proposed plan calls for the mitigation of the 0.30 acre wetland impact by enhancing 0.90 acre of non-forested, reed canary grass and meadow foxtail- dominated wetland, located in the floodplain area east and south of an Oregon ash wetland forest adjacent to Fanno Creek, on the Fowler School site in Segment 2. This provides a 3:1 enhancement ratio and mitigates adjacent to the largest wetland impact incurred by the trail system. The existing wetland forest area is dominated by Oregon ash and reed canarygrass, with scattered clumps of Piper's willow, clustered wild rose, and Douglas' spirea. The wetland will be enhanced by planting large Oregon ash saplings and Piper's willow cuttings, to extend the forested wetland area into the meadow area, and appropriate shrubs (clustered wild rose, red-osier dogwood, and Pacific ninebark) will be planted adjacent to the existing forest near the trail to provide additional wildlife habitat. The trail will still remain open and not obscured by the plantings (for security reasons). A complete copy of the proposed mitigation plan is included with the printed material submitted as part of this application. Sensitive Lands Review Listed below are the approval criteria contained in the Sensitive Lands section of the Tigard Community Development Code along with the applicant's response to each: 1. Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the.base flood discharge. 5 • • The attached letter signed and stamped by a City of Tigard state-registered civil engineer certifies that the proposed project will preserve the floodplain storage capacity of the portion of Fanno Creek within the project area, that the zero-foot rise floodway will not be disturbed, and that the project will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. 2. Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.120 of the community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards. The land within the project area is zoned R-4.5, IP, and CBD. Landform alternation is permitted in areas designated as commercial or industrial. The proposed use is community recreation and, as such, is an exception to the prohibition on landform alteration within residentially designated zones. 3. Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year floodplain. As indicated in the attached memo from Vannie Nguyen, P.E., the proposed alteration will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100- year floodplain. 4. The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as untimely. The proposed alteration is a pedestrian/bicycle pathway project that carries out the City pathway plan and the policies and objectives of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. 5. The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood. The above-mentioned memo from city engineer Vannie Nguyen, P.E., verifies that the pathway will not be located above the elevation of an average annual flood. 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained 6 • • The approval of the Division of State Lands has been obtained. A copy of the project permit is included with this submittal. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approval is pending. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and ESEE Analysis The Water Resources Overlay provides for the consideration of a comprehensive plan amendment to remove the WR overlay designation from a property based on a specific development proposal. According to 18.85.140, the approval process requires the applicant to justify the appropriateness of the proposed. removal based on the results of a State Goal 5 ESEE analysis. In response to this requirement, the applicant's analysis of the economic, social, environmental, and energy consequences of allowing the proposed pathway use is provided below. - Economic Consequences • Numerous studies illustrate that proximity to natural resources increases property values. Similarly, inclusion of greenways in new developments has been shown to increase the land value of surrounding properties and to accelerate lot sales. Other studies have shown that property values tend to decrease by distance from open space; However, no studies could be located that specifically address the effect on land values of the placement of an all-weather pathway through a greenway. In general, based on the popularity of pathways, it is possible to speculate that a well-developed greenway path system contributes to rather than detracts from the economic well being of a community. Social Consequences The social and other benefits of preserving wetlands are widely recognized in this community. Though its Sensitive Land and Water Resource Overlay code provisions, Tigard currently provides more protection for its wetlands and water resources than most other communities in the state. The social consequences of allowing the 0.30 acres of wetland fill may include the incremental diminution of: the scenic value associated with the complete preservation of the resource sites, the quality of life related to the protection of wetland wildlife habitat, the urban design and open space values associated with full preservation, and the educational value associated with complete protection. To the extent that the wetland fill decreases the scenic, wildlife habitat, open space, and educational values associated with the three wetland sites, then there are adverse social consequences associated with allowing the proposed vegetation removal and fill. • • • Most of the 0.30 acres of wetland impact occurs to the wetland located along the western edge of the Fowler School athletic fields. The area impacted is the fringe of mowed and disturbed wetlands. It is infeasible to avoid this impact by moving this path segment further away or to the other side of the creek. This is due to the existing sports field use on the one side and to the location of the wetland within the backyard lawn areas of six residential lots on the other. The other areas impacted are the narrowest sections of two lineal wetlands, each of which crosses the route of the pathway and cannot be avoided by the re- routing the trail. The impact to the wetland within Segment 4 potentially could be avoided by moving the trail alignment to the upland on the other side of the creek. However, this is neither practicable nor less detrimental, because the area between the top of bank and the existing industrial uses on this side is narrow and steep and would require much of the path to be located to within a few feet of the top-of-bank. An additional obstacle to moving the path is that one of the two owners of land within the area under discussion has refused to consider allowing access for the trail. The social benefits of allowing the 0.30 acres of wetland fill relate to outdoor recreation and to the improved accessibility the trail would provide. The trail would provide a reasonably direct route through the center of the city for long or short trips. It also would provide a more direct and safer walking route for many of the children who walk to Fowler Middle School. Tiedeman Avenue is the main walking route of the middle school-aged children living north of the school. This street is designated as a major collector, but includes a sidewalk on only one side of half its length. Two-way traffic volumes are in the 7,000 ADT range. This creates a dangerous situation for school children and other pedestrians. The proposed greenway path segments connecting to the school will provide a much safer walking route than presently is available. Lastly, to the extent the trail project is consistent with the 40-mile loop regional trail plan, it also will meet regional social needs. Environmental Consequences In general, the typical environmental consequences of allowing a trail to disturb wetland sites are related to the incremental loss of wildlife habitat as well as degradation of other wetland functions and values. Placement of fill for a trail will eliminate wetland vegetation. Even without wetland fill, a trail will generate significant levels of human activity and will degrade wetland habitat values. Examples of these disturbing uses include wildlife harassment by unleashed dogs and off trail uses. Illegal trash dumping and littering also occurs along trails. Trash can pollute water, harm wildlife and provide a seed source for non- native intrusive plants. Restricting a trail would keep human activity to a minimum. 8 • . Although, to a greater or lesser extent, these typical human impacts would apply to the present project, the.physical design of the trail segments poses very limited disturbance to the existing vegetation. It avoids all forested and most scrub-shrub areas;with the exception of the two Oregon ash trees needed to be removed for the bridge over Fanno Creek in Segment 4, Woodard Park to Grant • Street. The majority of the wetland impacts occur to emergent (and in some areas mowed lawn grass) wetlands. The impact to riparian vegetation is very limited. With regard to maintenance of the existing hydrology where the alignment crosses wetlands, the trail as designed provides very little disturbance to existing hydrology for two reasons: 1) most impact areas are located near the outside. edge of wetland, where little or no disruption to the wetland's hydrology occurs, and 2) the trail passes surface water hydrology adequately by surface sheet flow of water over the top of the trail, since the trail is set at grade. A boardwalk is. proposed for two areas, the impact area east of the bridge included in Segment. 4, Woodard Park to Grant St., so that net fill can be avoided (this area was still calculated to be fill) and on the Dolan property just south of Main Street where the trail is constrained between the top-of-bank and an existing building. The acquisition of the wetland and upland area of the proposed trail location on the south side of the creek will allow removal of an undesirable use of the natural area, by no longer storing heavy equipment and vehicles in this area, and allow for clean-up of this disturbed urban wetland. An additional goal of the trail through this section is to connect with the existing ramp up to Grant Street. Re- routing the trail to the other side of the creek in order to avoid the wetland is not feasible because the path route would traverse a very steep slope immediately upslope of a wetland and Fanno Creek and would come very close to exiting industrial buildings. Moreover, the owner of one of the two parcels on this side of the creek is opposed to granting access for the trail. Segment 5, Grant Street to Main Street, is constrained by existing buildings (the Woodard Apartments) and topography (existing berm located very near an oxbow of Fanno Creek). Near Grant Street, the vegetation impact from the trail located within 30 feet of the creek is mainly to Himalayan blackberry. The alignment minimizes riparian impact by preserving existing trees. The trail is close to the creek at the oxbow, again due to constraints of the building and berm location, and from there connects to the existing trail which is located close to the creek. This area also is constrained, specifically by the George Morlan warehouse. No alternative alignments are present. Segment 6B, Main Street South, is very unfortunately constrained by an existing building on the Dolan property as well as the long political history of"Dolan vs. the City of Tigard". This segment is located within a fixed easement purchased from A-Boy and it is not possible to be re-routed. No easements are currently present on the other side of Fanno Creek, which in any case also contains an existing commercial building sited close to the creek (eighteen feet at the 9 • • narrowest point), and the owner is opposed to granting access to the Main Street portion of his property. Energy Consequences There appear to be no positive energy consequences of prohibiting the proposed wetland fill. Rather, the energy consequences of allowing the fill are overwhelmingly positive. They include reduced oil consumption and reduced reliance on energy inefficient. automobiles. The project will complete a link in the city and regional bicycle circulation systems. It will encourage bicycle commuting and bicycle use for recreational purposes by providing connections to neighborhood destinations and commercial and industrial land uses. As future trail extensions and neighborhood connections are completed, the trial system will further help reduce air pollution and reliance on the automobile. Conclusion Based on the evaluation of the resource sites wetland functions and values, and based on the analysis of the environmental, social, economic, and energy consequences of allowing and restricting the conflicting use in question, the conclusion reached is that the City should allow the conflicting use on a limited basis. It should amend the comprehensive plan to allow the 0.30 acres of wetlands fill needed to construct the Fanno Creek trail segments in question. The rationale for this conclusion is that full protection of the three wetland sites, while maintaining existing environmental conditions, but would have important adverse economic and social costs. Full protection would require not connecting the long planned trail. Avoiding the wetland sites would require cost prohibitive boardwalk construction in addition to that already proposed or the re-routing of portions of the trail onto the street and leaving gaps and missing links in the trail corridor. The trail's social and energy benefits of providing outdoor recreation and improved accessibility clearly outweigh its wetland impacts. Providing a reasonably direct route through the center of the city for long or short trips and helping to reduce air pollution and reliance on the automobile are important social benefits that carry out Comprehensive Plan transportation and recreation policies and goals. The impact to riparian vegetation is very limited and again, one of the values of the urban Fanno Creek Greenway is to provide recreational, aesthetic, and educational opportunities for people. A counter balancing environmental benefit of allowing the fill is that the wetlands involved are of limited value (the mowed wetlands along the sports fields) and will be mitigated by the enhancement of a portion of the better quality wetlands on the school site. 10 . • Title 3 1n 1998, Metro Council adopted performance standards for the protection of streams, wetlands, and floodplains, called Title 3 of the Functional Plan. Tigard and the other jurisdictions within Metro are required to amend their comprehensive plans and develop codes to address these new standards by January 1, 2000. In addition to Title 3, Metro has adopted a model ordinance that provides approved examples of provisions that can be used by jurisdictions to comply with Title 3 performance standards. Although the City has not as yet adopted Title 3 compliance measures, the Metro attorney has determined that local comprehensive plan amendments related to water quality and flood management must comply with Title 3 as it stands during the period before adoption and acceptance of such measures. Since only the model ordinance, and not Title 3, contains standards for pathways, these are followed in this application in order to address the question of the present proposal's consistency with Title 3. The applicable portion of the Model Ordinance is Section 1.5 "Walkways and bike paths". This section reads as follows: b. A paved walkway or bike path shall not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the Protected Water Feature. For any paved walkway or bike path, the width of the Water Quality Resource Area must-be increased by a distance equal to the width of the path. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation. Where practicable, a maximum of 10 percent of the trail may be within 30 feet of the Protected Water Feature; and c. A walkway or bike path shall not exceed 10 feet in width. The trail alignment was developed based in part on the avoidance of significance natural resources and maintenance of the 10% standard specified in the model ordinance. However, due to development along the creek and the extent of wetlands within the floodplain, aligning the trail to meet the 10% standard proved impracticable. According to the attached chart, as presently designed, 33% of the trail including paved and boardwalk portions, is within 30 feet of water resource boundaries. The reasons for this amount of encroachment and the consideration given to alternative alignments that could reduce this impact are detailed in the ESEE analysis section of this report. To recapitulate briefly, Segment 2 is constrained by the sports field location. Segment 4 is constrained by the need to cross the creek bend and the configuration of the wetland within the greenway area. 11 • • • Segment 5, Grant Street to Main Street, is constrained by existing buildings (the Woodard ApartmentsYand the existing berm, which is located very near an oxbow of Fanno Creek, and also by the need to connect to the existing trail, which is close to the creek. Segment 6B, Main Street South, is constrained by an existing building on the Dolan property. In each case, no alternative alignments are present. Although the alignment exceeds the 10% standard,the trail poses very limited disturbance to the existing vegetation and has avoided all forested and most scrub-shrub areas, with the exception of the two Oregon ash trees that need to be removed for the bridge over Fanno Creek in Segment 4. In order to compensate for the removal of riparian vegetation, however limited, and to enhance the vegetation along the creek, a specific planting plan for two highly disturbed sites of 0.83 and 0.78 acres, respectively, has been prepared (see attached). The planting plans are designed to meet the Title 3 baseline standard of 80% groundcover and 50% tree canopy using non-nuisance planting from the Native.Plant List. Construction drawings for this work are under preparation. This proposed upland re-vegetation work is in addition to the mitigation required by wetland fill permit conditions. As a result of these two projects, the net effect of the trail project will be to improve the overall biological conditions of the riparian area along Fanno Creek. In addition to City of Tigard engineering staff, the qualified professionals who contributed to this project include David Evans and Associates, Fishman Environmental Services, and Percival Associates. David Evans and Associates conducted a topographic and tree survey of the project area. Fishman Environmental Services completed a wetland delineation and mitigation plan, plus an existing conditions assessment of the project area. Percival Associates provided planting plans for the two upland areas adjacent to the creek (attached). Topographic, tree survey, wetland, and debris and noxious materials information is depicted in the base maps accompanying this report. The implementation schedule, including timeline for construction, mitigation, mitigation maintenance, monitoring, reporting and contingency plans are included in the reports. These timelines are subject to right-of-way negotiations and the timing of the necessary permits and approvals. I/Irpn/d r/trail.selands.ap 12 cs, • _, v I•O ��.�f� •Trdack of �'J 41it� � � \ 1 I 5/8" Iron Rod w/VPC Marked Fowler School I 't;. Bonfield Easier Shod •TECH ENGR PLS 990" S• Kooning Fldd ��- \�, m`s- I Backstop Boil F•dd� - I JO y y c + I /� ►� �, �am-1/ " Iron R•d I J "'Iron Rod `'3a� WWDEAP C Mark L• / - .4 PS 1 /5/8 No Co Bent �` 1/ Iron Rod nes Workout I 10.0" �� ' •Fitness Si.• Equipment T¼ \\ l I• _ \go;�� f OL" ... ... .:.::......................:: :::.. N. `\\ 'f�� Workout �' �- ..j ._` SN 0 re 1`� •114`�!. \ Equipment \ `� ��i - - ...� _ I I ........... J' J D "Fitness\••urs� O R. I Begin \\ ��`� t" 0 - �/ lJ Path Centerline 1 O I N 652146.3174 6' Ch• / _ \ 0 - ., • I ... 4 V .,�;� • 4 1 E 7615154.4697 \` \` �. `O - O 0,\:111 r.bin Esist Sidt�olk a link Fen ++ ~ �� 1 'T r tv� N ` \ I I 1 10+04.51 �� r . Canst. Sled Pasts- 2 ea. �_joPK , O �-50' .- }N p I Ire ROW � O ' 1 / \\ I I I 1 •o .• \ I 1 I Tap of Bonk �✓ /�\\ \\ ' I I \ ` 01 1 // 1......."/ \\ \\\ Curve Table ' ' P \ \ \ ` it / / ��- \\ \ Length ( } t ) 9 1TT\ Curve No.Len th 1t Radus it Ddta Ton ent I ` l I // / / \ 1 14.21 1000 81-23-52 8.60 I I \ i ,\\ \\ 1734 1000 70-4T-13 709 I I ■ // \ \ fJ 57.09 74.00 44-12-13 30.05 I I I • \\ 1 ti� / \\/) \ io i� 15x0.00 23-a9-05 10.5544 I I Z /$YPCr Ma ked \ 1 J/ \ 0 294.34 175.00 96-22-02 195.61 I OBEC PLS 2553' \ ( ` I I 0 41187 100.00.00 2-09-3x4 71.40 ; 0I , I � , T4+tfi48 I \ II = \ 39.27 25.00 90-00-00 25.00 1 TZ� I 5/e" IRON ROD 1 20.24 15.00 77-19-3B 17.00 1•+ 1 1 wK/URAHA I PLSK 1945 I I\ \\\ I Ijl 22.62 15.00 86-23-10 14.08 P 1 I I FANN09 1997"\ \ 5/8" Iron Rod ` I \ \ *• W/1PC Marked \J \ \ I / G• \ " BEG PLS 2553" ` \ ` \ I o,, - \ I P Nail`\ ` \ \ \ Pathway LEGEND ' {\ F 5/8" Iron Rod . \ �•.. I I "NARRQW 'Egg Marked ` ' \ <` \G Marken I BRIDGE Sign 4' OPLS 2553" . \ \ 1 Bridg \\ N. Wetland Impact Area l s. I ROW N.., 'N..,\ \ p frl ``� 1 ____---- 2 3/4"gross Cap \ \ \ \ \ \� Marked CITY CONTROL TIGARD i 1 I 6` .1 UNLAWFULTO 0 STURB" \ 1 \\\ \\\ ��1�1211:1 '1)'I . . 1\ , t.'114111°1 27+80.I \`\,�✓ - I ` ' . \\ \\ TE MAO-A y E L Sted Posts Co. 2 SECTION CORNER . \b0 \ \ ,I •27+89.6' • 3 1 2" ALUMINUM CAP _ ��_ 653433.0986 2.75" MARKED "WASH. CO. \ OEA CONTROL" \ ��` _ ' /,1'i r 7815726.1201 i.` SURVEYOR TO 1982 D W/RPC Marked \ ' UNLAWFUL TO DISTURB" ` `� 1/2" Iron Rod \`_- \\ Top of Bonk , /• . Ey586A J • f•t •SPEED 35" •.y, `\ �\ \ ��1 Existing Asphalt Trail pit'- , eRr, \ _ \ ��` •s*y anilary MH .I. �� �'C!_ i. Rim=754.86 NOTE: sled posts eta be constructed as per • `\ \ a \\\ .\\ 3 ,''I;I 51w+=isMN s Standard Data9 Na 192 of the Standard Detodt. Posts shall be pointed wilt+ rod .roa1Nh 'I'o'n o. - . --- a3kavn Jaa/M Pathway \ \ \ \ ..� ��(�.-- 5/8" Iron Rod and white ■triers roe aaa, We ` : - • \\� \ e/1. ce ��, ,�r�L► sO 2.5' S' S' 2.5 \ ,' • STEEL POST DETAj. Existing Ground \� S:gn ° -, N.i,i y\.•∎•••�� 3" Class•C• AC �\ Fenno Creek. Trail Permit �______ 1 ,� ■ 2, /7 za slope `\,. �\ Sheet 2 of 9 1 1/98 I________, 41a •R_ x .. - I r Aggregate Shoulder .61140.''' '\ " _ mot - - Nat'l - 3/4' - 0` (T,p) 8 of 3/4"-0 4311) FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 2 �. *GIN �N VANNIE T. NGUYEN • TYPICAL SECTION ENaa ,,�ij1� TIGARD STREET TO TIEDEMAN AVENUE N. at>� _A LL ') LAYOUT Is• CITY OF TIGARD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT �T• Sheet 2. Segment 2 Trail Location and Wetland Impact and Bridge Over Summer Creek STAFT �„ ,,,e«,,.�a FILE No. 260 Dike NAME: - Its. �� I p,a Fpm ho,•pw q6 (amt•y.an CIP98_ N:\ENG\1998\FANNO2\SIT L rue in 1••-era Zcrf9 • . • • • r 1 I i f r .. • _,-- . . . . ,/ / / I L _ I � � _ _ / I // _ MEADOW STREET — — ' g� Construction / BO. / 1000.00 N N 652500.1365 \ .\.\/C■, E 7315613,9251 I Join Exist AC I I / .� •i'ooden I I I I = Curve Table g, 0�',// •�i� © I I I I I 1 �� Curb No. Length (ft) Radius(ft) Delta Tongent (f) Q. J•rc ' ,'• \ c "e • 0 21.18 10 121'21.55" 17.61 2 3/4- rass Ca -'� ( `' ° w� Marked City of p // pa' v ;t'Ort. ou+ O 13.07 15 4954.50' 6.98 Tigard Control Point" Q) l',i•:' 5/8- Iron Ro °m a 34.83 25 79'49.34 20.91 — — — — 0 >5 1 R 7.• — — — No Cap. +0.4 — — — — \ o+ O 28 60 25 79 49 36' 1609 • 341 CM-•�t��..w41:... 12+f)0 13+00 N S / •ailing , ��1 I — ---f�... _I _ 4+00 � 15+00 +'• Imo, — — — 0 36.15 25 82St'00• 22.06 / • old Bndg_ 4•' S.�� I I I 1 1 PTS�•(?IiTlt - - / PK\Nail 1R - - - - - - - - - �o Exist / v`� / I R'm=15].98 Y• 4141 ` 1 N 5/B" Iron'Rod I 5/e'Iron Rod t-F—t/ill for Future b 9� ` �, P / w/YPC Marked I � w/RPC Marked Katherine Street+ �� PN �� "OBEC PI 2551" I '41.0.0.7. Contrail" • I. I I ��'� 1 600 NE Grand Ave. Q~ • I I (Robert & Christine Everett I Metro Section Carne it)S 10240 SW Katherine Street 1,7 0 clo\ / ;!j•�• 3 1/2" Alum. CQp Portland, OR 97232 I I Tigard, OR 97223 `�j IL�� Wash. Co. 1962 S• <\ \`- 161 GP SEC axe v, I • l i1 -oth y B Cen seine / \ / \�I \ S , I I Z 1., rs f/PRC Mar -• ratheay CenteMne\\ 7SO "13EA Conr " I IA R/W for Future I ( OON Kenneth & Alice Tolliver • Johnson Str„t I 1 \ Bonk f 10200 SW Katherine Street • 1 \ I I Tigard, OR 97223 � ton Rod - \ t`�' 7R�• I I I 1oat912rete I I 1 I\ SanitaryR I I fill ii; I I I \ \ im=750 \1.`! I re- tikii. t'A • I I I \ \` / i--� ♦0` ,4 \a' w. I I \ "�— /� ' _ �_ \ •r I \__ // \ O• 8 5/8" Iron Rod ''�'��� w/YPC Marked ��`-- \\ \ Paris Ac Assoc. PLS 2 64" I 1 ./2"km Red I I I c 6• Chain Block Wall �Pl:Worked 5/8" Iron Rod I w/Board Fen e 'OEA Control- �� t[r / Link Fence • �r No Cop. Bent, I Pr pane Tonk I •1,: .� +0. Block Wall w�Cuard Posts — — — — I Sanitary +i-� 4 J"' ash r w/ Choin Link F • "Obe Learsh X Rim=150.84 - ���.. Rim=�Sy1.0g Law ySign . — — TS —1A1:' 4 Sanitar . °� . r• 1/z Iron Rod -' �: �1' I y..t 4! R 4141 _ �y /R PC Marked --_ �``9`0 P4C3 6 �.��� ZO Ty ��-.,Z 'oEA contra" . w sanit• Fame V ` Q1+00 +00 ,Fa•3+00 +100 tim_1 �`���� .. Asphorf Por r ` �■ I �� , Ong Lot I �� , e� 9 ' 9 1 ILA ►, op... . Ssgmmt 4 �\ tar / \ tso 7 P PK Nail Wetland 1'9•`,� Pathway / / 1�► e.' OIL . ��, ��� ■ E / / ♦' 25 •f hard (l I'!,� v u D i on \ 2.5• 5• 5• 2.5 / Ren=try 13125, Moll Blvd.23 V tsi _� _ / / h R=1x9.77 rgord.OR 9722 O �• �// Existing Ground I / / �_- t. ' %�� / /�/_ ''>i�y�c I 3'pass'C AC / / / Rma,. / / \'����/�/�� // /� / / ------� =1 _\Ran•15 ,/ // •+ 2)<Slope-� �� ,p. / 1 \ eo t 7 //7--- //I' �� \\ '\\ Aggregate Shoulder - \ \ EEK / Mall - 3/4' - 0• (T)p) 8• OF 3/4-_0 `\�\!\ \ -' NQ �"/ - \\ •`t' 1 t no \\ - \—�� fPN 1 I� _ �I�, \\ Fanno Creek Trail Permit ___ WN =W - TYPICAL SECTION \`, Sheet 3 of 9 1 1/98 N.T.5. 4.... 1.. VANNIE T. NCUYEN A FANNO CREEK TRAIL—SEGMENT 3 TIEDEMAN AVENUE TO WOODARD PARK Og1rEUarA MAMA= tjl e lil _. 1 I LAYOUT oaaow . is CITY OF 'WARD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FILE NO 260 DWG NAME: s1+� Sheet 3. Segment 3 Trail Location KARLEEN M. AICHELE OREGON .r�>«rr41r..w. • I wart rain I faAMEERx41C TEO••p,w xKgs z,cie-i dP98- N:\ENL'\1996�FANN03\SRE L 1 rm (aa70 no 9 . 0 • 1 \ I // • N \ 1 / / T/cgRO ST ••j►, Prop.. Ent 3 *`:t / / / \ . '� Exist Parking lot Property Line J \ -7. ti 0 \` / / //1 Ii I/p tJ / „gar- ... Rex Eost \\ E. �� , / / / 2 W 96nu \ \ . �` 9726 Q6ahonia InG / / / �--/ // �\ f \\ O ? 9826 SW Tigard St N. ts...'”.........d '.,. / N \ -(''-' 411k1.. 1 \ ~ \ \ / a-,P /. . Ap.......„.......■ \ Q 1 _ \ �. ►,1 \ `\---- _ \\ \\ � ��t1��,z � Exist Licking ae / ���- -• �, / / y� / / ' &� ii✓ ,.., �� 9ANN0 CREEU \`1+ �/ /// LEGEND ' \ / Q \ j:.:_,. i © Upland Mho / / \ \ � ��� �. /+' '_ asp ` O \\ /// // Wetland Impact Ar6o \\ \ `,! r, ,• ill '1 O W� /,� ,y2 / / // \ \\ N �c�ll� `.: �:Jl� "u+4 fr `'). .,I/ iiio �/ / \� t� ,_ /: a r� zs '� .. PAZ' 0 III �/ , f, T $�.�� ,e: Vill"1114 • 6c.:_. lf 4 . „ /0 , Pathway T q.2.5' 5' 5' 2.5 .16. .S� O/ Existing Ground � •��. 3•Can•c- Ac wETLAND �MpP.CT �, y ?• /'2X m L y 46+ rr r.:ti T 41 • sx. _ Aggregate Shoulder ++ • W 3/4• - 0- (Tv) B•OF]/4•-0 1\�„', // // z =3 c ' 1a9= ,7Vt /..__R/W ''\ SECTION A—A 1 "i = 100 1 /// Curve To_ble Curb No. Length (ft) Radius (It) Delta Tangent (It) 15.13 50 i72O1O• 7.62 Fanno Creek Trail Permit 48.40 50 55'22.36• 26.28 Sheet 1 of 9 11/98 3 46.47 50 5522'54- 26.24 . 4 50.56 200 1429'05- 25.42 84.67 200 2415'18' 42.98 - - - 2 88.30 200 2517'44• 44.88 1XU 49.86 100 28.34'48_ 25.47 O ,N FANNO CREEK TRAIL — SEGMENT 4 ,* 44. x. VANNIE T. NGUYEN WOODARD PARK TO GRANT AVENUE• asxow .Ll -1 I LAYOUT 41.2 tfs' r QTY OF TIGARD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FILE N0. 250 OMIG NAME: MOLT Sheet 4. Segment 4 Trail Location and Wetland Impact and Bridge Over Fanno Creek N lu1RtEEN Y. AICHELE oaE1bN u�x. l9 g P 9 (xaae: means ' o.oRCERx.6 rzo so.r Kw4 L>ml .ml gP96_ N:\ENG\1996\fANN04\SRE L1 Mt w-m� • • �`� Ste. rgara 19x6" �`` 1" 1 -117"W''" \\�r /�� z Ill. jei 0 ` �©9 % ?% . vi . ;II`v '5/6"ken Rod.. `/ No Cov�'1`+; ]\\ 1246 SW Grant Ave. / Tigard.OR 97223 /4:it /�J R c cty of rgara �/ O \ • A . /1 / �� ulxs sw nal elw. / li �i/ ;� W Nerd.OR 97223 11 ■ _ N // ', k c1' '°` \ �AHHO �\ ■ /7 o �\ / I / j \ •PK Noil ‘ .! / / ,,.. 0,c\ �. I / ç\\ �,� ap NNNN:,> • Pi 143*Choin + 11101 -/2"Iron Rod \�� I / / /RPC Worked \ 7 Q I bEA Contra' 0 \\\ Boaketodl Link I End/ \\ NooD / •- ••• crate I G/R� Construction . - . Robert Boo&Sherry Weise \ / WI / 2255 NW Johnson Street.•1 1/2'ben Rod I N 651257.9942 • / Portlond.OR 97210 I / w/RPC Mort • E 7618237.1143 / / 'oEA contr•r. I I Join Ernst Conc Path / / - / // �a I I Gty of Tigard / 13125 SW Natl Blvd 1 rgod.OR 97223 Morton Properties i 1 / 5529 SE Foster Road 1 / Portland,OR 97206 / n I 1 p.p. ° • lh. I f / 1 1 _ 2.5° 5° _ 5' 2.5 / 1` `• ' Existing Ground z 1/2'Bross Cap / 1 Noted'OR.State- '1'\�\i\ 3�bas*.C• AC / I/z'Loy Rod t, \ • a yiop of Bridge \\ \ ./RPC Marked \\ e3 / 'oEA Contra' // \ /o.rneoa 49/' / PGE#1663 ` ' -Prate&Sn' Note: Average Vertical O:trance l "7/�r� •`7 �, .. From Existing Path to Bottom Aggregate Shoulder �� Sarnimry AdMlles._'\` g Mat'1 — 3/4'— 0'(Tn,) 6'OF 3/4'-0 \`\i1. Rim=152.5: / .9n\ of Bridge Arch—6.4 Feet Scale: 1• = 50' / �41� Briage Support\i, / 3'Hanardi .1 I SECTION A-A //'� X / 12 CAP • / . NOT TO SCALE / 7•Chan \ �/ P \� Foot Path Easement Link Fence NV• cE�sss per oeee / - ■ Bode 163 Pnge 457 / / Valley / Cutter / s \ / /0...4, George Kodey cv \ / // s�s\ ( 12551 SW Moro Street 'D _Curve Table / i\G//\ 7igara.OR 97223 p e 0-- Bend, —"Gl of / ya Curb Na Length(ft) Radius (ft) Delta Tangent (ft) / QPP `\ / moss Bra°./Braes Nord"Sign 0 15.71 10 9000.00' 10.00 Weanr Ma kea 15.73 10 9006•56 10.02 /' / 'Weiser LS 2801" / / PK N• // / \ \ Easement \\\\�" Area 63.29 75 4952.44' 34.88 ' • O 18.46 25 4218.40' 9.67 /' / 0" ��•0 31.55 75 2406',3' 16.01 / ` S� ' Bak r O 53.86 - 75 4108.45' 28.15 / / / - �,P\` OntlB gaga 5/8'I. Rod • N. 0 3556 25 8V3006• 21.54 G 514 /- S/,k Walked . Fanno Creek Trail Permit 0 17.94 25 4106.24' 9.37 / 'Pasco Pty x801• Sheet of 1 1/98 • . ) FANNO CREEK TRAIL-SEGMENT 5 • �! �t� VANNIE T. NCUYEN �»MANAGER Itl X11 GRANT AVENUE TO MAIN STREET . - - ammo _1.111 I=11 LAYOUT - `1M T,N6s-r air OF TIGARD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FTLE NO. 260 ONC NAME: MEET KARLE EN M a U. AICHELE OREGON an to Neu e ac Sheet 5. Segment 5 Trail Location Impose I U1°NEF7VSGIt0••OAII nom «>,�, gP96_ N\EHG\199e\FAN NOASfTC L1 • S . • Curve Table Curb No. Length (ft) Radius(ft) Delta Tangent (ft) O 13.78 19.17 4110'50• 7.20 " • O 13.17 15 5098'15. 7.04 .. . O 16.03 11.79 7753'23" 9.53 \ O 25.40 15 9T00'Se 16.96 \. _ 0 42.32 115 21'05'05' 21.40 0 19.37 200 05•32'59' 9.69 - 5• WOODEN FENCE ON OTTO SORG 0 8.74 10 50135'26' 4.67 • RETAINING WALL 12566 SW MAIN ``V`O ■ {af • - - , , \ �',��•� `� 6 CHAIN i g , \ i. LINK FENCE ' * ``. mm o -` ��\�`��\_ `+,..,a10..- _ DAVID & CHRISTINE HAMMOND S 8 i r � \ 4 12562 SW MAIN 8 Xn,• � a .... Y 7� W E Easement Easement m � © �` ' /q1 �® 1.►mod— ) i °u Pathway ® t� End AC 'olA ` a-- -----� M il1 I I \ \�� ==� N mo,* v i 4' 4' - ----''''''., v2 ER. Rafting I \ �I\ �,+� '�,^p cn \ �� . � _� r ZW•S 3" Class C AC \ \ / � \\ OI/ lI- I e' ar34•-o ompoillEV � r vim—=— ��Existing Ground ECTION A-A �� = ��—Axle t� _f �/ ��vii."--_,...1111S. \\ 0 �/1�1��� I Easement PATHWAY Easement I - I ' s 1_ 0 I W IP CC Rainq 1 .4' 4 • < �4. I / \ I ' . g co f m 1 wm^- woo^ I Z / 1 Q I Decking C / '' DOLAN & COMPANY INC.• A-BOY EL I / ' I 12520 SW MAIN ECTRIC STREET Vi ���18"x 6'ova Lam I - -" - I SC ' — •7B" I �sh� y-7 —z—o I . "i\\� , _ / PAGE N. STEVENS 1 - Pier 1` STEVENS MARINE I 9180 SW BURNHAM STREET Fanno Creek Trail Permit !' Existing Ground 1 1 /98 — - Sheet �p of SECTION 8-8 FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 6B 4, . MI i�• VANXIE T. XCUYEN ,,, , „11111�I1 AT MAIN STREET CMCIIICIERaNG 41. •II LAYOUT ,s O` t .e.4..,- y t NO3'o aTM TiGARD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FILE NO. 260 Owc NAME: !QT Sheet 6. Segment 6b Trail Location and Bridge Over Fanno Creek KANOWEN AICHELE OREGON =�• 17�MOOR(@� ,�� oiox[urs�s ico0•a•x me xi°CC°i s“- pP98_ N:\ENG\1996\iANN06\SDI L1 >asr . • 11 EXISTING PIPER'S WILLOW FOREST I I 5/8• Iron Rod I► : //YPC Marked _ ��'• �✓, e 1 '1ECH ENGR PLS 990 Edge of 1t�7, Track y • ` <�, Boll field 4 Fowler School •r,�� ,� 5 Io I Backstop Boll F.IId-� • ` I Running Field c - c � + 5/8• Iron Rod•�� 'fit.. Wm`�I�RP�°M°R d ' SHRUB ENHANCEMENT AREA - �' .4 P5 N° °p ee^' �// �'��•,�� EA CONTR••L _ 1/ Iron Rod nes Workout H • ;, ,�' r fitness 1 " M°rked Cours Equipment 10,0• .� I�% ,•, ..�, i Course Sian •pEA ONTROL• l�� 4� iY.fi/" ' '. \ N Z 7 X- — 1 t `- 1/ ''Iron Rod- h • W YX I�,I I-F. �b9 V •'.. � �_ 0— ' A CONTROL Syr( /�'I, ._..... �,44�• f °p of .. ; ...,• r.:i-:.•L+_ .• r.r •1 i r.r r.r ,Auw,� r r.r �_ "•. 4 -..__.... -. a - _ - - - _ of . ����7w\\k• Jr. Workout Equipment \ : ./(0 `.• _ _ •T' wi- '^h:C \ 1 1 I • "Fitness\••ur � � O 0• e o • a-0- Cam— o MA- 1n \ a Path Centerline 1 la N 652146,3174 6 C \_ link Fen - + ��• — '\ Si I •E 7615154.4697 \` \\\•+ P� ] a ' \ Join Exist Sde.dk \ '1 2 �__ ,� EXISTING OREGON ASH FOREST !PROPOSED to+1x.+1 '�, l' PIPER'S WILLOW, ConaL Sted Pmts- 2 _—-- - -FOREST 1/ \\\ OREGON ASH 1"1 1 I I I I I\ \, a I Top of Bank //�— _—,� \\ \ \\\\ FOREST P _ . \ I \ • ti It ..._(.....- / \ ' : i I I ::::: 1•1 iask ) ' (:1�� i I i FANNO9 1997" 5///8YY"pp Iron Rod \ \ \\ I 'q \ \(if"OBEC PLS 2553" ' \ \\ \ - I ' / b•• • \ I •P Noil• \ \ \ ♦ 1 4'. \ Pathway , .t r\ 1 1 "NARK W • F S 8" Iron Rod ' \ .1 ' LEGEND ♦.\G Marked I BRIDGE Sign 'ME C Marked \ Wetland Impost Area ,• `` tl IIMI 4• EC PLS 2553" Bridq- \ \ ,�[. l _ -- __ ` \ ROW \ \ •Y� \l!` � r I 2 3/4-gross Cop \\\\ 40 SURVEY CONTROL 111 TIGARD \ \ \\ �■. 'i� 11, 1 I UNLAWFUL TO DISTURB- \ '� \ 1 6• \\ ' • 6• �� 1 4. \ \`w0 \ fI 1 \ \ \\ \. 27+e0.35 • 3 34 Canal St1ed Pmts - 2 ea. `\ \ Illikil:A End construction \\ P� \.:\;:�: - � ' o° �\ \ 17+8 .61 2• 35 SECTION CORNER \\ 1�_ I 1' 0988 3 1 2- I\LUMINUM CAP N-•DEA CONTROL" \ r 7615728.1201 2.75• MARKED WASH. CO. \ ��-- 'SURVEYOR 1982 $ \ w/RPC Marked \ �\ To of Bonk ES586'11 1 • ' t AC UNLAWFUL TO DISTURB" \ \ \� 1/2• Iron Rod \`--_—\` \\\ p �., / ,, _ - jI SPEED 35" fff \ �\ \ U ` , 114.. xisting AspholtTroil • 4� Rim-1 4.86 m `\ \\ \\ '' fir SI orTn 05 -- NO Stall posts shall ba contracts per \ \ Standard Detail No. 192 of the Standard roatNO3 TO'°'o, ~\` \ .,� '4'I� 5/8" Iron Rod oeto8s. Posts shall be painted with red a3x NO 7da/• Path.ar \ \\ -, _ i . .L 3Q and .hlte stripes. cox coa'.e/c• \ \ 'en" ce -—- iP fE `\ \ Im ` r _ Existing Gourd STEEL POST DETAI, �,,N a r aria•G• AC \`\, \ Fanno Creek Trail Permit •.. Sign____ ' ; N.T.S. \\���\i1� — �, 2%gape—x-- ... \ Sheet —1--of 1 1/98 I •1 i-- - - ,c.. 2% mil/ _ zs 2r '\ 1 + �•r:�� war.- q°+ Aggregate Shautder e. „4_D �..,, � FANNO CREEK TRAIL — SEGMENT 2 • Mat) - 3/4' - 0- (T7p) QyaO.tiriQi t' VANNIE T. NOUYEN �, ,,, „Illl1i11 TIGARD STREET TO TIEDEMAN AVENUE TYPICAL SECTION • t1'=ii LAYOUT Sheet 7. Existing Conditions and Proposed Enhancement Mitigation N.T.S.g p 9 CITY OF 'TIGARD ENCWUM La. DEPARTMENT FILE NO. 260 DWG NAME: !Qi EXISTING WETLAND CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED ENHANCEMENT AREAS 3 il 16 98 STAFF OREGON �� N:\ENG\1996\fANN02�5fTE L1 • �tovinn nViAs I oroatt:aarc Tco..opn .razor, p°f w 7'; a(s9e- -4 of9 0 • Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Type Size Quantity per Approx. Planting Total # (minimum) Template Area (sq. ft.) Plants Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia FACW nursery - Stock 5 to 6 feet tall 1 31,700 317 Trees Oregon ash*** Fraxinus.latifolia clump of 3 every 50 feet 13 Piper's [Hooker] willow Salix piperi [hookeriana] FACW cutting 4 to 5 feet tall 3 7,000 210 **Total Oregon ash trees = 330 red-osier dogwood nursery 2 to 3 feet tall 2 3,300 _ 66 _ Cornus stolonifera �sericeaJ FACW stock Shrubs Pacific ninebark Physocarpus capitatus FACW- nursery 2 to 3 feet tall 1 3,300 33 clustered wild rose Rosa pisocarpa FAC s ockry 2 to 3 feet tall 2 3,300 66 Fanno Creek Trail Permit Sheet 2 of 9 11/98 LEGEND loft. Consultants in ecology and natural resource management Fanno Creek Trail - Fowler School Site * X X=number of plants within template DRAWN: S. Benjamin p p Mitigation Plan APPROVED: M. Walker loft. —�: Fishman Environmental Services PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS o' OMAN 434 NW Sixth Avenue • Suite 304 DATE: 11/16/98 Portland, Oregon 97209-3600 Sheet 8. Proposed Planting Specifications (503)224-0333 Figure # 8,49 1 Project # 98073 -N-(1 411 4,0 � �i, r x i s �' 1:11::-r II<3• s?' ' ..4°.ro x:s[P ,u r.�a > `. ,' `.'. _ 'R.'�4' , r�" .»_?a a-.`M .....n.« ' .= ...: ''�'�I I City of Tigard TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Community JUNE 7, 1999 — 7:30 P.M. Shaping Better Community TIGARD CIVIC CENTER - TOWN HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OREGON 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS 4. APPROVE MINUTES 5. PUBLIC HEARING 5.1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT (CPA) 1999-00001/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 99-00001 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT The City, as applicant, requests consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to remove the Water Resources Overlay from small portions of three wetlands to allow construction of segments of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Greenway trail between SW Tigard Street and the SW Ash Avenue Extension. The combined area included within the wetland fills in question is approximately 0.30 acres. As part of this same application, the City requests Sensitive Lands approval for trail improvements within the 100-year floodplain and Title 3: Water Quality, Flood Management, and Fish and Wildlife Conservation approval for a conditional use within the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential, Industrial, Central Business District. ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5, IP, CBD. LOCATION: Fanno Creek Greenway between Tigard Street and Ash Avenue Extension. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775, and 18.797; Title 3 of the Metro Functional Plan. 6. OTHER BUSINESS 7. ADJOURNMENT .-17 "•Fa°"1F:. �y�` /,..• �. - :.°," -r.�- ;i"r°,a. ;.ff..x;.- ,{ 3 1g • STAFF=REPORT ;:z4,� :_.. '5::. 6 " w. at*.re's ."'•°.` ° °" _ u.SS '�.° t"�rn :__ � _ �• " e"-.N raw ^ TOgTHEgPLANNINGCOMMlSSION $` - ,. -- ,re `d - :CITY-OF GARD,' - _` ; ���FOR`THECITY OF TICAR®,OREGON _ commune y � t L«:s ..'.DY.. RY` ..g;' - r .c. -P•»as: _. w„ A»sd, ,> M .. .,.SfLCL']}!nq)4„cetterxCommunT - - - - - r ^V,, M.' •�1, 120 DAYS = N/A SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment CPA 1999-00001 Sensitive Lands Review SLR 1999-00003 PROPOSAL: The City, as applicant, requests consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to remove the Water Resources. Overlay from small . portions of three wetlands to allow construction of segments of the multi- modal Fanno Creek Greenway trail between SW Tigard Street and the ' SW Ash Avenue Extension. The combined area included within the • wetland fills in question is approximately 0.30 acres. As part of this same application, the. City requests Sensitive Lands approval for trail improvements within the 100-year floodplain and Title 3: Water Quality, Flood Management, and Fish and Wildlife Conservation approval for a conditional use within the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone. APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: City of Tigard Attn: Duane Roberts, Project Planner 13125 SW Hall Boulevard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN `DESIGNATION: Low.Density Residential, Industrial, Central Business District. ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5, IP and CBD. LOCATION: Fanno Creek Greenway between Tigard Street and Ash Avenue Extension. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3 Model Ordinance. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION ::-Staffproposes:that the Planning Commission_,recommend APPROVAL;to:tle;City.Councl for the above request;subject to Certain.Conditions,of Approval The proposed findings and conclusions on,.which the recommendation is based are noted in Section:IV CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 1 OF 13 • ti CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE.SATISFIED:.. ::.;: I 1. Submit a copy of the permit approval from the Division of State Lands and US Army Corps of Engineers. 2. Install erosion control measures prior to construction. Erosion control measures may not be removed until construction has been completed. 3. Any fill placed within the floodplain shall be offset by an equal amount of excavation elsewhere within the floodplain portion of the project area. 4. Upon completion of construction, the Water Quality Resource Area shall be restored and maintained in accordance with the mitigation plan and specifications contained in Table 2 of the Title 3 Model Ordinance. 5. To the extent practicable, during construction existing vegetation shall be protected and left in place. Work area shall be carefully located and marked to reduce potential damage to the Title 3 Water Quality Resource Area. Trees in the Water Quality Resource Area shall not be used as anchors for stabilizing construction equipment. 6. Where existing vegetation is removed during construction, or the original land contours disturbed, the site shall be revegetated, and the vegetation shall be established as soon as practicable. Nuisance plants, as identified in the Metro Native Plant List, may be removed at any time. Interim erosion control measures such as mulching shall be used to avoid erosion on bare areas. Nuisance plants shall be replaced with non-nuisance plants by the next growing season. 7. Prior to construction, the Water Quality Resource Area shall be flagged, fenced or otherwise marked and shall remain undisturbed, except as may be required to complete the proposed trail improvements. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1983. The Comprehensive Plan includes a bicycle/pedestrian trail element that calls for a bikeway along Fanno Creek. The Comprehensive Plan and 1987 Tigard Park Plan identify the Fanno Creek bikepath as a continuous, off-street path that follows the route of Fanno Creek as it flows between the northern and southern city limits. Between the 1980's and mid-1990's, new development in the area of the Fanno Creek Greenway was conditioned to provide the bikepath as conceptually identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Within the boundaries of the present project, bikepaths have been constructed along the streamside edge of the Morlan Plumbing property and under the Pacific Highway bridge connecting to Main Street. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 2 OF 13 • • In order to add more specificity to the Comprehensive Plan designation, in 1997 the City conducted a technical study, with extensive public participation, to map the alignment of the trail from Tiedeman to Durham Road. In designating the most appropriate route, the study considered wetlands, soils, vegetation, wildlife, and topography within the greenway corridor as well as various social factors, such as neighborhood and employment locations. Vicinity Information and Proposal Description:. The land uses along the two sides of the trail corridor consist of a school sports field, industrial • development, commercial development, and older single-family residential development on 7,500 square foot lots. • The boundary of the Greenway Corridor is coterminous with the floodplain. Over the years, significant encroachment and fill_ has occurred within the greenway Corridor, which is located within an older part of the City. With the exception of parts of three segments, the proposed trail segments consist of a 10-foot-wide paved pathway with two feet of shoulder on either side. This width is consistent with regional and state standards for the Fanno Creek Trail and is designed to provide for the safe passage of two bicycles approaching in opposite directions. The five segments are, from north to south: Segment 2: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (Fowler School Site) Wetland Impact Area: 11,250 square feet (SF) (750 linear feet); 52 cubic yards (CY) excavation; 427 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Summer Creek Segment 3: Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park (Woodard Park Site) Segment 4: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue Wetland Impact Area: 1,995 SF (133 linear feet); 0.17 CY excavation; 117 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Segment 5: Grant Avenue to Main Street Segment 6b: Main Street South Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Total Wetland Impact Area: 13,245 SF (0.30 acre) or 833 linear feet of trail; 52.17 CY removal and 544 CY fill Three bridges are part of the project, and will span Fanno Creek (twice) and Summer Creek from top-of-bank to top-of-bank. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND PROPOSED FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: CHAPTER 18.775, SENSITIVE LANDS Section 18.775.020.0 states that landform alterations or developments which are only within wetland areas that meet the jurisdictional requirements and permit criteria of CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 3 OF 13 • • • the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Division of State Lands, Unified Sewerage Agency, and/or other federal, state, or regional agencies do not require a sensitive lands permit. The City shall require that all necessary permits from other agencies are obtained. All other applicable City requirements must be satisfied, including sensitive land permits for areas within the 100-year floodplain, slopes of 25% or greater or unstable ground, drainageways, and wetlands that are not under state or federal jurisdiction. The proposal will impact wetlands that are under state and federal jurisdiction and, therefore, do not require sensitive lands review. Permit requirements of state agencies are addressed elsewhere within this report. The Water Resources overlay is applicable to the wetlands impacted by this project and is addressed elsewhere in this report. Floodplain impacts are addressed below. Section 18.775.020.E.2 states that sensitive lands permits shall be required in the 100- year floodplain when any of the following circumstances apply: • Ground disturbance(s) or landform alterations in all floodway areas; • Ground disturbance(s) or landform alterations in floodway fringe locations involving more than 50 cubic yards of material; • Repair, reconstruction, or improvement of an existing structure or utility, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure prior to the improvement or the damage requiring reconstruction provided no development occurs in the floodway; • Structures intended for human habitation; and • Accessory structures which are greater than 528 square feet in size, outside of floodway areas. The proposal includes ground disturbance involving more than 50 cubic yards of material in the floodway fringe. Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) 183.120 defines "floodway fringe" as the area of the floodplain outside the floodway area. Therefore, sensitive lands review is required for this project. Section 18.775.070.B provides that an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: • Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function, and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge; The project engineer has determined that the proposed project will preserve the floodplain storage capacity of the portion of Fanno Creek within the project area, that the zero-foot rise floodway will not be disturbed, and that the project will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 4 OF 13 • • • Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the Comprehensive Plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.120 of the Community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards; The land within the project area is zoned R-4.5, IP, and CBD. Landform alternation is permitted in areas designated as commercial or industrial. The proposed use is community recreation and, as such, is an exception to the prohibition on landform alteration within residentially designated zones. • Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100- year flood The applicant has proposed to offset the proposed floodplain fill with an equal amount of excavation within the 100-year floodplain, so that the proposed alteration will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year floodplain. • The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as untimely; The proposed alteration is a pedestrian/bicycle pathway project that carries out the City pathway plan and the policies and objectives of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. • The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood; The applicant proposes to locate the pathway above the elevation of an average annual flood. • The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, ,, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained; and The approval of the Division.of State Lands has been obtained. A copy of the project permit has been provided to the City. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approval is pending. • Where landform alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The proposal under consideration carries out the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 5 OF 13 • • PROPOSED FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Planning Commission recommends City Council find that the proposal satisfies the approval criteria for landform alterations within the 100-year floodplain. WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (18.797.080) This Chapter has standards for sites identified as significant on the Tigard Wetlands and Stream Corridors Map. The standards identify Fanno Creek as a Major Stream, which requires a 50-foot setback from top-of-bank or the upland edge of associated wetlands. Table 18.797.2 identifies water related recreation facilities and trails as a "Type I allowed use with mitigation" within the riparian setback area. However, any landform alteration within wetlands in the Water Resource overlay is prohibited. Section 18.797.140 states that in order to develop within wetlands, a Comprehensive Plan amendment is required. This section addresses the applicable criteria for construction of the trail in the riparian setback area and for the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Section 18.797.060.A states that, for Type I uses, the applicant shall prepare a plan that demonstrates that the use will be constructed and located so as to minimize grading, native vegetation removal, and the area necessary for the use. The Director may require additional information where necessary to determine WR district boundaries or to mitigate identified impacts from a proposed development, including , but not limited to: • Site survey as prescribed in Section 18.797.060B; The applicant has submitted a site survey completed by certified land surveyors. • One or more of the reports described in Section 18.797.060D. The applicant has submitted a topographic survey as conducted by David Evans and Associates along with a technical study prepared by Fishman and Associates addressing the vegetation removal and grading associated with the proposed and alternative trail alignments. The proposed alignment minimizes natural vegetation removal and grading to the maximum extent consistent with trail safety. The applicant also has provided a wetland delineation study covering the project area, as well as a wetland mitigation plan. Alternative sites are limited due to the intended location of the trail adjacent to Fanno Creek and the location of the existing trail system. Segment 2. Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue, has unavoidable wetlands within the project area. Beginning at Tigard Street, the trail is routed outside the wetland boundary and crosses the unavoidable portion of the wetland near its narrowest section. The trail then skirts the edge of the wetland and the edge of the playing field and associated equipment (fitness course signs, workout equipment stations, and ballfield backstop) and impacts only a narrow fringe of mowed and disturbed wetland. All Oregon Ash trees on the north side of Fanno and Summer Creeks are avoided, and only emergent wetland is impacted. The bridge crosses Summer Creek where no adjacent wetlands are present, and then joins with Tiedeman Avenue to connect with Segment 3. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 6 OF 13 Segment 3. Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands in the park, as well as an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) mitigation area north of the park. Segment 4. Woodard Park to Grant Avenue: The trail skirts above the wetland boundary where possible, impacting a narrow fringe of emergent wetland on the north side of Fanno Creek. The trail runs in an upland area on the south side of Fanno Creek and then crosses a narrow neck of unavoidable emergent wetland, avoiding forested wetland areas. Trail alignment is constrained through this segment,due to steep upland slopes on the n_orth side of Fanno Creek; the trail has to cross a backwater emergent area on the south side of Fanno Creek to connect with the paved ramp up to Grant Avenue. Impacts to the backwater wetland area are avoided by constructing a boardwalk bridge across the wetland area, with piers in the upland (top-of-bank to top-of-bank). Segment 5. Grant Avenue to Main Street avoids wetlands. The trail alignment has been routed outside of the wetland area; it connects with an existing concrete walk located north of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Main Street. Segment 6b. Main Street South: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands, and a large section of the proposed trail on the east side of Fanno Creek was abandoned due to the extensive amount of wetlands.present. A part of the trail in this section is a boardwalk, to raise the trail up and avoid excessive fill (in uplands) near the top-of-bank of Fanno Creek. In this segment, the location of the bridge crossing Fanno Creek was constrained by the City's easements on the adjoining properties (and by construction of a new building south of Main Street on the east side of Fanno Creek). The trail continues in upland on the west side of Fanno Creek to connect with the existing. paved pathway. A southern portion of this trail segment connects to the Ash Street right-of-way, avoiding wetlands on both sides of the trail. The wetlands along the trail alignment have been delineated and described in two wetland delineation reports prepared by Fishman Environmental Services (FES) in the spring of 1998. The two impact areas are described below: The northernmost impact area is in Segment 2, on the Fowler School site owned by the Tigard-Tualatin School District. The trail skirts a broad flood plain of Fanno Creek dominated by reed canarygrass and meadow foxtail, and crosses a narrow neck of the wetland that extends away from the floodplain area (this wetland neck extends upslope to the west, off-site to a wetland seep area). The trail then impacts a narrow grassy fringe of emergent wetland east of the school ball field and west of an Oregon Ash wetland forest that is immediately adjacent to Fanno Creek. Part of this wetland area is regularly mowed as lawn associated with the ball field. Soils in the floodplain area were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silty clay loam, with no redox concentrations to 6 inches, over a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) stiff clay, with brown (10YR 5/3) redox concentrations to a depth of 16 inches. Soils in an upslope position near the crossing of the wetland neck were a very dark gray. (10YR 3/1) silty clay loam to 16 inches, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations,, and gray (10YR 5/1) depletions at 14 inches. The floodplain receives high-water over-bank flows from 'Fanno Creek and has a high groundwater table. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 7 OF 13 • • • The other segment with wetland impacts is Segment 4, north of Grant Avenue. The trails passes through an emergent meadow associated with the floodplain of Fanno Creek. Bentgrass and Reed dominate the meadow area Canarygrass, and has soils that were a very dark grayish brown and dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2 and 4/2) sandy silt loam, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations and dark gray (5Y 4/1) depletions in the surface 10 inches. The soils had a compacted hardpan at 10 inches, possibly disturbed from previous sewer line construction. The second wetland crossing in this segment occurs on the opposite (south) side of Fanno Creek, where the trail crosses a narrow finger of sparsely-vegetated, disturbed wetland dominated by Climbing Nightshade and Red-Osier Dogwood, with Himalayan Blackberry on the slopes. The trail avoids the surrounding Oregon Ash and Red Alder trees near the trail. Water quality in this backwater area appears to have been negatively impacted by trash and debris. Section 18.797.140 requires the following criteria to be addressed to allow the proposed fill and mitigation of wetlands designated on the City's Significant Water Resources map: The analysis shall consider the Environmental, Social, Economic and Energy (ESEE) consequences of allowing the proposed conflicting use fully, consider both the impacts on the specific resource site in comparison with other comparable sites within the Tigard Planning Area; The ESEE analysis must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Tigard City Council that the adverse economic consequences of not allowing the conflicting use are sufficient to justify the loss, or partial loss of the resource; In particular, ESEE analysis must demonstrate why the use cannot be located on buildable land, consistent with the provisions of this chapter, and that there are no other sites within the Tigard Planning area that can meet the specific needs of the proposed use; The Comprehensive Plan calls for a trail through the Fanno Greenway, which is defined as the area co-terminus with the 100-year floodplain. Because of existing development along and within the floodplain and also because two-thirds of the floodplain area is wetlands, very limited locations are available at this time for the retrofitting of the trail within the corridor. A trail located on buildable land outside of the corridor would not be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and, because of creekside development, would have to be designed as an on-street trail. Such a trail would serve a transportation function but would not serve the purposes of a recreational trail as conceptually identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's ESEE analysis demonstrates that the benefits of allowing the trail far outweigh the limited negative consequences associated with its environmental impact. The ESEE analysis shall be prepared by a team consisting of a wildlife biologist or wetlands ecologist and a land use planner or land use attorney, all of whom are qualified in their respective fields and experienced in the preparation of Goal 5 ESEE analysis; CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 8 OF 13 • In addition to City of Tigard Planning and Engineering Staff, the qualified professionals who contributed to the ESEE analysis include David Evans and Associates, Fishman Environmental Services, and Percival Associates. David Evans and Associates conducted a topographic and tree survey of the project area. Fishman Environmental Services completed a wetland delineation and mitigation plan, plus an existing conditions assessment of the project area based on the Water Quality Resource Area Requirements table included in the Metro Model Ordinance. Percival Associates provided planting plans for the two upland areas adjacent to the creek. If the application is approved, then the ESEE analysis shall .be incorporated by reference into the Tigard Comprehensive.Plan, and the Tigard Wetland and Stream Corridor Map shall be amended to remove the site from the inventory. PROPOSED FINDING: Based on the analysis above and the applicant's ESEE analysis incorporated herein by reference, the Planning Commission recommends City Council adopt a finding that the adverse economic, social and energy consequences of not allowing _ portions of the Fanno Creek trail are sufficient to justify partial loss of the wetland resource. TITLE 3: WATER QUALITY, FLOOD MANAGEMENT AND FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION, MODEL ORDINANCE CONDITIONAL USE REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.F 1n 1998, Metro Council adopted performance standards for the protection of streams, wetlands, and floodplains, called Title 3 of the Functional Plan. Tigard and the other jurisdictions within Metro are required to amend their Comprehensive Plans and develop codes to address these new standards by January 1, 2000. In addition to Title 3, Metro has adopted a model ordinance that provides approved examples of provisions that can be used by jurisdictions to comply with Title 3 performance standards: Although the City has not as yet adopted Title 3 compliance measures, the Metro attorney has determined that local Comprehensive Plan amendments related to water quality and flood management must comply with Title 3 as it stands during the period before adoption and acceptance of such measures. Since only the model ordinance, and not Title 3, contains standards for pathways, these are followed in this application in order to address the present proposal's consistency with Title 3. The applicable portion of the Model Ordinance is Section 1.5 "Walkways and bike paths". This section states as follows: b. A paved walkway or bike path shall not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the Protected Water Feature. For any paved walkway or bike path, the width of the Water Quality Resource Area must be increased by a distance equal to the width of the path. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation. Where practicable, a maximum of 1.0 percent of the trail may be within 30 feet of the Protected Water Feature; and c. A walkway or bike path shall not exceed 10 feet in width. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 9 OF 13 • • • The trail alignment was developed based in part on the avoidance of significance natural resources and maintenance of the 10% standard specified in the model ordinance. However, due to development along the creek and the extent of wetlands within the floodplain, aligning the trail to meet the 10% standard proved impracticable. According to the applicant's submittal, as presently designed, 29% of the trail including paved and boardwalk portions, is within 30 feet of water resource boundaries. The reasons for this amount of encroachment and the consideration given to alternative alignments that could reduce this impact are detailed in the ESEE analysis section of this report. To recapitulate briefly, Segment 2 is constrained by the sports field location. Segment 4 is constrained by the need to cross the creek bend and the configuration of the wetland within the greenway area. Segment 5, Grant Street to Main Street, is constrained by existing buildings (the Woodard Apartments) and the existing berm, which is located very near an oxbow of Fanno Creek, and also by the need to connect to the existing trail, which is close to the creek. Segment 6B, Main Street South, is constrained by an existing building on the Dolan property. In each case, no alternative alignments are present. Although the alignment exceeds the 10% standard, the trail poses very limited disturbance to the existing vegetation and has avoided all forested and most scrub-shrub areas, with the exception of the two Oregon Ash trees that need to be removed for the bridge over Fanno Creek in Segment 4. In order to compensate for the removal of riparian vegetation, however limited, and to enhance the vegetation along the creek, the applicant has provided a specific planting plan for two highly disturbed sites of 0.83 and 0.78 acres. The proposed planting plans satisfy the Title 3 baseline standard of 80% groundcover and 50% tree canopy using non-nuisance planting from the Native Plant List: This proposed upland re-vegetation work is in addition to the mitigation required by wetland fill permit conditions. As a result of these two projects, the net effect of the trail project will be to improve the overall biological conditions of the riparian area along Fanno Creek. In addition to City of Tigard Engineering Staff, the qualified professionals who contributed to this project included David Evans and Associates, Fishman Environmental Services, and Percival Associates. David Evans and Associates conducted a topographic and tree survey of the project area. Fishman Environmental Services completed a wetland delineation and mitigation plan, plus an existing conditions assessment of the project area. Percival Associates provided planting plans for the two upland areas adjacent to the creek (attached). Topographic, tree survey, wetland, and debris and noxious materials information is depicted in the base maps accompanying this report. The implementation schedule, including timeline for construction, mitigation, mitigation maintenance, monitoring, reporting and contingency plans are included in the reports. These timelines are subject to right-of-way negotiations and the timing of the necessary permits and approvals. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 10 OF 13 • • PROPOSED FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Planning Commission recommends City Council find that the applicant's plan satisfies the. standards of the Metro Title 3 model ordinance relating to Walkways and Bike Paths. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department and Water Department have had an opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. - - The Operations Utility Department has had an opportunity to review the proposal and has offered the following comments. Because the proposed trail will parallel an existing sewer trunk line, the trail could provide access for sewer line maintenance and emergency repairs. It also could provide improved access for much needed stream bank stabilization projects. As such, the trail surface should be constructed to support the weight of utility vehicles SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and The Unified Sewerage Agency have had an opportunity to review this proposal and offered no comments or objections. The Oregon Division of State Lands has had an opportunity to review the proposal an offered no comments or objections. The Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development has had an opportunity to review the proposal an offered no comments or objections. The US Army Corps of Engineers has had an opportunity to review the proposal and offered no comments objections. Metro was given an opportunity to comment on the proposal and provided the following comments: Once again, thanks for taking us on the field trip. We all enjoyed being able to see the alignment first hand and to see that two critical needs, providing trail opportunities and protecting natural resources, are being met. Metro is totally supportive of Tigard's efforts to design and build the portion of the Fanno Creek trail that lies in the City. It is a key segment of the entire trail system from the Willamette Park at John's Landing to the Tualatin River. Overall, the City is proposing a reasonable plan to comply with the Title 3 requirements. As discussed on Friday, below are our comments: When the trail abuts a wetland or is in the vegetated corridor of a stream, where possible or practicable, reduce the area of impact through means such as: CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 11 OF 13 • • • Narrowing shoulders (from 2ft to 1ft)with native vegetation and/or grasses • No mowing of the shoulder adjacent to the wetland • Narrowing impervious trail surfaces (from 10ft to 8ft) • Pervious trail surfaces where possible (Gresham is using compacted gravel - call Phil Kidby, Gresham Parks at 612-2530 and Metro is planning to use compacted gravel on the Springwater Corridor Trail - call Dawn Uchiyama, Portland Parks at 823-5596 for more information) • Boardwalks as an alternative along wetlands and at pinch points There are numerous opportunities for restoration of the riparian corridor including removal of non-native, invasive plants and replacing them with native plants. A 3-year plan for monitoring the success of the restoration projects is recommended. Title 3 requires that any fill added to the floodplain be matched with an equal amount of fill removal to maintain the capacity of the floodplain. Staff Responses: Regarding the necking down of the trail and shoulder, our understanding was that this comment applied to two areas: the wetland area along the edge of the sports field and the portion of the trail alignment located on top of flood control berm. We understood that Metro had no objection to a ten-foot wide trail in the upland areas. In order to avoid user conflicts, • we would prefer to built to the state and regional ten-foot standard. City staff is agreeable no mowing of the shoulder adjacent to the sports field wetland. Since the trail route and shoulder is within the existing lawn area, we will need to coordinate with the school district regarding a change to their current practice of mowing the entire sloped area. Pervious surface where possible is a suggestion we have investigated. Other than experimental surfaces and expensive inter-locking pavers, crushed rock appears to be the only feasible alternative surface available. City staff do not view this as an appropriate surface for the Fanno Creek Trail. This is because the trail is intended to be multi- modal, serving pedestrian, bicyclist, wheel chair users, and skaters. Compacted gravel is not suitable for narrow wheeled bikes and roller and in-line skates and is problematic from a maintenance point of view. Therefore, we would prefer to go with an asphalt surface. We plan to use boardwalks at the two locations we pointed out in the field. The plan has been revised to include compensatory excavation, as required under Title 3. The excavation will include removal of the overgrown hard surface basketball court and the grubbing out of the blackberries in the area between the flood control berm and creek bank on the Johnson Street Apt. property. The cleared area will be restored with natural vegetation as described in the project proposal. Engineering is doing the quantity calculations at this time. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 12 OF 13 • • To go back, when we visited the apartment property, we incorrectly identified the trail as running on top of the portion of the berm near the • bend in the creek. Instead, the trail is proposed to run over and along the apartment side of the berm and within in the lawn area. It then runs up and back over the berm. For handicapped and ramp safety reasons, we would prefer to not narrow down this section of the trail to eight feet. Our engineers believe this width is too narrow relative to the gradient of the trail and would pose a potential safety hazard to trail users Robert Bothman of the Fanno Creek Trail Working Group has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: - I have reviewed the amendment and the plans for segments 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6B. I have visited the segments and support the amendment and plans for these sections. SECTION VII. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS Dewey and Margaret Hamilton have reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: We are retired and walking and riding bicycles along these trails is important to us in maintaining a healthy life style. Being able to walk and ride on a.trail with a natural setting rather than a roadway is an important safety feature for us. Ken Tolliver has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: I want you to know that at least one family is 100% behind the needed amendments that your are considering. Access to the trail will increase the exposure of local residents to the natural areas along the creek and help them to be more connected with it. Please, approve the amendment requests. Mike Meredith has reviewed the proposal and provided comments in support of approving the ap licant's proposal. May 27. 1999 • PREPARED BY: Mark J. Roberts DATE Associate Planner May 27. 1999 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager 'Arpin\duane\fan nocreektrai l.doc CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 13 OF 13 �_ e,r �� r ��� r���<�� win �■ � CITY o f T I G A R D� 1.■1■LI� ra ,! y �fiN.,1411•111111,knovaL�� � �■ �■'�,rr.,,, . ■ ■. OE00 FAPN10 YFOPMA I G SYSTEM D� ���� � �� ■ ■ � P�■■ Pill= ■'- 1171 VICINITY MAP I_.. \Is, ti ism.: �.��i� �- . �■�- :�: �_..-�„�_ - Eu:ti te. it i ;N;;'1,1 �� ,�,��,. �i1111111W�. 1y g -4yr��ti ,��► . 1111111► - ■ • • � . 4.11 . �• . � TRAIL ALIGNMENT ` Liu IWIllair/bt , ..t* ♦ ,. ���� , � lew � ♦o. ■ �`0 4 , 1 16 Subject properties ii►I. �� Ili �; ► o '7 "4 t S*1 are included in the �''�� ►��' �.� • trail alignment project% ■ MI • .' IHIppJIHIIi *:Pil ' � 44N .. _, streams, ∎ `. a\ ,e" ` ♦ ♦'�'� MAJOR ■ ■ ■4 z 4 ' MINOR on-sr iltr."1.111110/5- i'4 . 4* .4. * \k\*VV 4 -441 ....."42.11,.., • 4., _, .; 410, „,,,, ,,,,,,,. , ` �� ♦ y �� Wetland Inv: IPML01.411111 Nib . , Ofr N ' 4,4\s,*S.4,":SN, h.t � Tigard �.. iiuiiiii: .�- pwriorU_,,A.41110111■01111 11■41/ ■ v.,4**'''‘., tf.t,:.s%, MIEN A. • :iii■∎�, ��.���l�i♦i��'► .1/4\\:::\�`�`�� N% \-\ 11 1� '� /�V . , .., �/ ` �� �!- c'iui' ■��� ♦�4,�1�►"c 1 _ �. .\�..s; 1"=858 feet ariera • ao ,..moillin II irAto, ovAA i so*"Barmy,1 .- ellolit... II toe .# v *-- •7 4 -A sus isi.- i - Aio :,/ �'��,,0 A ,‘00v4rat�� olds,� ' al City■ City of Tigard Milli V/AP .,, ' I-0014, ' ,r '• "',,O ■ N elm ■ Information on this map is for general location only and ....,.' ♦` �..u♦.- • ,Alimommilm� 1'■— _■ '� should be verified with the Development Service's Division. 13125 SW Hall 81vd ■ \! ,, , ' Tigard,OR 97223 ■�_ ■...■.''� '' , -. ■��� (503)639.4171 i1/ IMIMM r�rrrr NWIMW ■ P .0 *, ��■I■IE■��■ EMMA • h,tpJ/03)6 9-41rd.or.ns I��� ■■���r 111111. �1��■�����■�� ��� `�,,���•,�•• Plot date:May 12,1999;C:tmagic\MAGIC03.APR Community Development RI CITY OF TIGARD • Community Development Shaping Better Community PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BEFORE THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ON MONDAY. JUNE 7. 1999 AT 7:30 PM, AND BEFORE THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, JUNE 22. 1999 AT 7:30 PM. THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. THESE HEARINGS ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECEIVING TESTIMONY FROM THE PUBLIC ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NOS.: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT[CPA)1999-00001 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLR]1999-00003 FILE TITLE: FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER(S): Various Owners Duane Roberts, Project Manager (List available upon request) 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 x347 REQUEST: The City of Tigard is requesting to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources overlay from 0.30 acres of wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, to allow construction of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Trail. Sensitive lands approval is also requested for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. LOCATION: 1S134 AND 2S102; Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over Summer Creek); Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Segment 3: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a bridge over Fanno Creek); Segment 4: Grant Avenue to Main Street along Fanno Creek; and Segment 5: Main Street South (has a bridge over Fanno Creek). ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3. THE COMMISSION'S REVIEW IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON THIS REQUEST. THE CITY COUNCIL WILL ALSO CONDUCT A HEARING ON THIS REQUEST PRIOR TO MAKING A DECISION ON THIS REQUEST. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT-CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND/OR CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF)NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT LAND USE PROPOSAL ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT MITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOI&D ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HE G. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PR TED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER MAY 17. 1999, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL' OF THE REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25 ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK J. ROBERTS AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. - --._ __� CITY of TIGARD IM ir „ �' •■ � -t •�� LI --'1 �EMI mo.m ".. • ........r.,---1 VICINITY MAP K.- .v- /A.:O �_ =�Gik p•E:�i an mil CPA 1999-00001 MINE v,,�■-�■� p�..i. lien 1, -vs � \SiA.II■IIr��'■� �;? ■■I� �l1�Iani ■ \.� 6:k l,.',� . CITY OF TIGARD .:.1111111 ....ME -��,, \\� � �`��`\����" ■.. ��:.--•� �• . '%• ��• FANNO CREEK 41..� 19 -..,;.�7 tes∎0�� k TRAIL ALIGNMENT■ \.1:11./i����� ��� \ N�\ •' �I, 16 Subject properties ins �=�►ie ;�- \\ o� ,V .. ••j�� ! are included in the �n■m�� i1v�.� �� � . �� trail alignment project J�!'ffI'IllII 1 Milt %•/in. v.",0�` 0%; �`�4,�/ Streams oc.�II�;,. S.∎ .�` \\ •4, ,o• ,y'',, /� MAJOR i ,,,,■I .■■ IMrj` ,4* 4.* " .\` �� >...44,. , / \/ MINOR ing �I $44 9 ,*�g�". #A ∎ ` 1 "`��,'�v�i�!`�` �, ���` \`;\\ Tigard Wetland Inv. laminae=Et44_ ■ 10 .• \ \ fin min _swim.* t, v �•'$4*•'�:t#,,r.�\ �\ , 9 L7 ,� ,399�... R•U liii�,I �..•,,,��, AV�'����1./'��,i■��I,. " City of Tigard � �ZIIIIMIN■j1■ $*9 � % ����i 111111 ■.■�I 1101.■■.. ,4 e. • 4,0 VV�1�1 ������,�_� e- ,�°o.. S.on9 and ;� '� . ►691.∎,01 ` _ �� a,asww1S.d ■ ToN.OA 97223 CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT LAND USE PROPOSAL • • S A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Y O OF TIG CITY TIGARD Community(Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: May 20,1999 TO: Brian Rager,Development Review Engineer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax: (5031 684-7297 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT[CPA]1000-00001/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR)1080-00003 ➢ FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT Q The City of Tigard is requesting to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources overlay from 0.30 acres of wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, to allow construction of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Trail. Sensitive lands approval is also requested for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. LOCATION: 1S134 AND 2S102; Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over Summer Creek); Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Segment 3: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a bridge over Fanno Creek); Segment 4: Grant Avenue to Main Street along Fanno Creek; and Segment 5: Main Street South (has a bridge over Fanno Creek). ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map, Applicant's Statement and Related Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 3,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (lease provide the forGrwing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: x.2ke. I Phone Number(s): CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • • A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS O1��! CITY OF TIGARD RECEIVED PLANNING Community Development Shaping Better Community DATE: May 20,1999 MAY 2 6 1999 TO: US Army Corps.of Engineers . Girt of TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: (503)684-1297 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT[CPA]1000-00001/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLR]1000-00003 ➢ FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT < The City of Tigard is requesting to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources overlay from 0.30 acres of wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, to allow construction of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Trail. Sensitive lands approval is also requested for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. LOCATION: 1S134 AND 2S102; Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over Summer Creek); Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Segment 3: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a bridge over Fanno Creek); Segment 4: Grant Avenue to Main Street along Fanno Creek; and Segment 5: Main Street South (has a bridge over Fanno Creek). ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map, Applicant's Statement and Related Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 3,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. , PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: k 44/ WTI S kr) pc,temn - 4 apittuarn 4 lote9-de,e-6,-Le ..xyrt2-610 P / ` 1 rte. 4a� /' 01'14 a L><JJ % i /7� d /. / • .�_ 1' • '—I a, 0_,u9tSZp LS L. Qh 6 YOZ �J e/iYl L� / �►�, _ aho oo • Lhan opy) 00(11,6 (-04)1.0114 k Upaati-5 (2lease provide the folThwing information)Na f Person( ) ommenti g: I Ph a imbeds): app -14/38 I CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT REQUEST FOR COMMENTS A CITY OF REQUEST FOR COMMENTS O ���° TIGARD , Community Development RECEIVED PLANNING ShapingA Better Community DATE: May 20,1999 MAY 2 5 1999 TO: Michael Miller,Operations Utility Manager CITY Qi TICIAHCI FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax: [5031684-7291 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT[CPA]1080-00001/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLID 1808-00003 ➢ FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT < The City of Tigard is requesting to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources overlay from 0.30 acres of wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, to allow construction of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Trail. Sensitive lands approval is also requested for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. LOCATION: 1S134 AND 2S102; Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over Summer Creek); Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Segment 3: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a bridge over Fanno Creek); Segment 4: Grant Avenue to Main Street along Fanno Creek; and Segment 5: Main Street South-(has a bridge over Fanno Creek). ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map, Applicant's Statement and Related Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 3,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. • _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (lease provide the following information)Name of Persons)Commenting: 49 r r Ni(' s): G I Phone Number[ I ' I CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • • • A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community cDeve(opment RECEIVED PLAWfifkg ABetterCommunity DATE: May 20,1999 MAY 2 8 1999 TO: lim Wolf,Tigard Police Department Crime Prevention Officer city CiF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax: (503)684-1297 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA]1000-00001/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW(SLR)1008-00003 ➢ FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT < The City of Tigard is requesting to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources overlay from 0.30 acres of wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, to allow construction of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Trail. Sensitive lands approval is also requested for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. LOCATION: 1S134 AND 2S102; Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over Summer Creek); Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Segment 3: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a bridge over Fanno Creek); Segment 4: Grant Avenue' to Main Street along Fanno Creek; and Segment 5: Main Street South (has a bridge over Fanno Creek). ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map, Applicant's Statement and Related Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 3,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PL SE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ti (t lease provide the farming information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: ,` A0\-` Phone Number(s): • x 2�O � • CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • .. REQUEST FOR COM , N CITY OF TIIIGARD Community cDevelopment X65/, Shaping A Better Community DATE: May 20,1999 TO: Julia Huffman,USA/SWM Program 4.1? c,. / r/� 1 FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Ro i ;its ssociate Planner Phone: (503)639-41T1/Fax: 150316844297 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT[CPA]1808-00001/SENS[HVE LANDS REVIEW[SLR]1008-00003 ➢ FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT < The City of Tigard is requesting to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources overlay from 0.30 acres of wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, to allow construction of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Trail. Sensitive lands approval is also requested for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. LOCATION: 1S134 AND 2S102; Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over Summer Creek); Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Segment 3: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a bridge over Fanno Creek); Segment 4: Grant Avenue to Main Street along Fanno Creek; and Segment 5: Main Street South (has a bridge over Fanno Creek). ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map, Applicant's Statement and Related Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 3,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. '4 Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ti '► (Tease provide tdie fof:liming information)Name of Person[sl Commenti IN A \ •Y ( h14 ) I Phone Number[sl: *Coy I CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • • r UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM DATE: June 3, 1999 • TO: Mark Roberts, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffman, USA SUBJECT: Fanno Creek Trail Alignment, CPA 1999-00001, SLR 1999-00003 SENSITIVE AREA A "Sensitive Area" exists. Project must preserve a 25-foot corridor as described in R&O 96-44 separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The creek, wetland/sensitive areas shall be identified on plans. FLOODPLAIN Site may contain flood plain/flood way designations. Grading within the flood plain/flood way shall be done in such a manner as to preserve the flood storage and flood conveying area without effecting any upstream or downstream properties in accordance with R&O 96-44. DIVISION OF STATE LANDS/CORPS OF ENGINEERS A DSL/Corps of Engineers permit is required for any work in the creek or wetlands. EROSION CONTROL A joint 1200-C erosion control permit is required if 5 acres or more is impacted. 155 North First Avenue,Suite 270,MS 10 Phone: 503/648-8621 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 FAX:503/640-3525 • • • �� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD DIVISION OF STATE LANDS Community�Development RECEIVED RECEIVED PLANNIN Shaping A Better Community DATE: May WOO 2 u P 2: 38 JUN 1.4 1999 TO: OREGON DIVISION OF STATE LANDS CITY OF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Associate Planner Phone: (503)639-4171/Fax: (503)684-1291 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA)1000-00001/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLID 1000-00003 ➢ FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT < The City of Tigard is requesting to amend the Tigard C omprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources overlay from 0.30 acres of wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, to allow construction of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Trail. Sensitive lands approval is also requested for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain. and wetlands. LOCATION: 1S134 AND 2S102; Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over Summer Creek); Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Segment 3: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a bridge over Fanno Creek); Segment 4: Grant Avenue to Main Street along Fanno Creek; and Segment 5: Main Street South (has a bridge over Fanno Creek). ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3. ' Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map, Applicant's Statement and Related Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: TUNE-3,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Dz. Please contact of our office. N m _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. c N Written comments provided below: .� o Gn / / N U/Gwt/( . )279044.<, GY. 3 —/ - ZGO o (n 14 (lease provide the forth-wing information)Name of Persons)Commenting: �j ,„ ►►„I__ Phone Number[s): 3 9,-;j70:3--- i Y CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT REQUEST FOR COMMENTS JUN-04-99 08 :31 AM SAUV I E IS. WILDLIFE AREA 503 621 3025 P. 02 • • • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIOARD Como;urirty 1?rt-Torment Shaping.t B1t:er Commurzlt-, DATE: M 20,,1999 70: Oregon Department of Fish&Wildlife FROM: City of Tigard Pla_nning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4171/Fax: [5031684-1291 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT[CPA)1983-00001/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW [SIR) 1088-00003 y FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT < • • • T-e O:ty of Tigard is requesting to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources • :`,''rI;v from 0 30 acres of wetland, as justified by an .SEE analysis, to allow construction of the muiti•modal r.:,nno Creek trail. Sensitive lands approval is also requested for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain ;i"!c: wetlands. LOCATION: 1S134 AND 2S102; Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over _rrmcr Creek), Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Segment 3: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a rr;_;e over ram()ram() Creek); Segment 4: Grant Avenue to Main street along Fanno Creek; and Segment 5: Main S:reet South (has a bridge over Famine Creek). ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community .e... oprncr:t Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro 'Title 3. - :,7,.:11 is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map, Applicant's Statement and Related Information for your review. Frorr information .. ol ed by various departments and agencies and trom other information available to our staff, a report and ...r•-:err'. atiGra will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment :h.s opal....a,on, WE NEED YOUR,COMMENTS BACK BY: JUKE 3, 1999. You may use the space provided below or separate letter to return your comments, If you are unable to respondby_the above.date, please phone the staff -t. te:', above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any •,:estions, uoruart the Tigard Planninc.l Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. • PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: • ':Ve nave reviewed the proposal arid have no objections to it. • P't::-tse: contact _ of our office. r;r\ i''ease refer to the enclosed letter. 'A'r:iten comments provided below: • • - , ;�r,t„r,;rnfor,ar::r7rt!Name of Person(s)Commenting: J �„ �,Nir, , l J / ,{'o! _.�Pnone Humbertsl: (, z_ I _ .3 • Ju N-04-99 08 :30 AM SAUVIE IS. WILDLIFE AREA 503 621 3025 P. 01 • • • OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE OREGON SAUVIE ISLAND WILDLIFE AREA �� N. WILLAMETTE WILDLIFE DISTRICT OFFICE , , f)ziPb4' `�45 18330 NW SA UVIE ISLAND ROAL) PORTLAND, OR 97231 .A�Wn/e TMww- Fish&Wildlife TELEPHONE NO. 503-621-3488 FAX NO. 503-621-3025 DATE: Ca - 61 ` C 1 PAGES TO FOLLOW: TO: .47 f- NO Der if 5_ ria.r.C1.1 FROM: _1 J ni (--)k S Ants - SUBJECT': COMMENTS: • • • JUN-04-99 08 :31 AM SAUVIE IS. WILDLIFE AREA 503 621 3025 P. 03 • • • • • Review of Application: City of Tigard: CPA 1999-00001/SLR • 1999-00003 • Review Date: June 3, 1999 • • Reviewed by: ODFW, Jim Grimes (503) 621-3488 . Applicant: City of Tigard • • 1 . The Oregon Department of fish and Wildlife has 2 previous correspondence concerning the proposed project • (attached) . The main issues can be summarized as: We identified some trail segments that should be • dropped or rerouted. to avoid riparian and wetland impacts . Since past 'development and has encroached • into riparian areas and filled wetlands, these habitats are limited. Much. of the remaining habitat is severely degraded. The Fanno Creek system supports state and federal listed species such as red legged frog, • cutthroat trout, steelhead trout, etc. We recommend that the best use of the riparian and wetland habitats is to protect them from development and reestablish • native plant communities. 2. The proposal violates the Title 3 guidelines for resource buffers . • 3 . Based on the information in our previous correspondence and this review, we recommend against the request. End of Review • • • • • • • • JUN-04-99 08 :32 AM SAUVIE IS. WILDLIFE AREA 503 621 3025 P. 04 • • f Z� Review of Application Division of State Lands #_: RF 16167 City of Tigard Agency reviewed by: Oregon Dept. of Fish & Wildlife Review date : January 11, 1999 Reviewer: Jim Grimes (503 ) 621-3488 1 . A field review of the site was conducted by ODFW during 1998 . 2 . The applicant proposes to impact wetlands, riparian area, and cross streams to construct a bike path . The applicant proposes to mitigate for wetland impacts from the separate segments in an area adjacent to Segment 2 . 3 . Comments for this permit will be presented by segment and primarily focus on recommendations to minimize wetlands and stream habitat impacts . 4 . Steelhead trout in the Upper Willamette ESU are proposed for listing under the federal Endangered Species Act . Fanno Creek historically supported this species and information from the mid 1990 's suggest they continue to persist in the basin . This project should be reviewed by the National Marine Fisheries Service. Path Characteristics 5 . The permit does not justify a path width of 15+ feet through wetlands and adjacent to Fanno Creek, possible critical fish habitat as defined under ESA. Where the path alignment is within 50 feet of a stream or impacts a wetland, the width should be narrowed to 8 feet. 6 . We recommend a minimum stream buffer of 50 feet for the • path to allow for a suitable riparian buffer. If sufficient area does not allow for that buffer width in a given segment, we recommend that the segment be rerouted to avoid those areas . 7 . Any bridge used for this project should be sized to fully span the active channel width, avoid abutment impacts to the streambanks below the top of bank, and include sufficient free board to pass a 100 year event plus associated floating debris. JUN-04-99 08 :32 AM SAUVIE IS. WILDLIFE RRER 503 621 3025 P. 05 • . • • f, • Segment 2 8 . Where the alignment crosses wetlands, it should be constructed in a manner that maintains exiting hydrology. We recommend that the path be a boardwalk design that is • elevated on wood piers . Segment 4 9 . The alignment should be realigned as indicated on the attached map to avoid some wetland impacts and avoid the need to cross Fanno Creek. Segment 5 and Segment 6b 10 . This segment is located too close to the creek. The segment should be relocated to traverse existing developed surfaces (parking lots) or rerouted to avoid these areas . This alignment will not allow sufficient riparian area. • Mitigation 11 . The proposed mitigation plan should include a more diverse mixture of shrub species such as elderberry cascara, . hawthorn, etc . . Appropriate herbaceous species should also be part of a planting plan. Western red cedar could be underplanted in riparian areas near Fanno creek. 12 , The proposed plantings should be included in a site specific planting plan. • In-Water Work 13 . Any in-water work should be limited to 'the preferred period of July 1 - September 30 . No exceptions should be allowed. End of Review • • • • • • ' 'JUN-04-99 08 :33 AM SAUVIE IS. WILDLIFE AREA 503 621 3025 P. 06 • • . a Review of Applicant Response Division of State Lands # : RF 16167 City of Tigard - Bike Path • Agency reviewed by: Oregon Dept. of Fish & Wildlife Review date: March 19, 1999 Reviewer: Jim Grimes (503 ) 621-3488 - - --. - • 1 . This response is based on the applicnats ' March 8, 1999 latter and is organized according to the corresponding "Item" number. 2 . Item 6 . We maintain our reccomendation of a minnimum buffer width of 50 feet as the absolute minnimum necessary to adequately protect fish and wildlife values of the aquatic and riparian habitats . Our prefferred buffer for • Fanno Creek is 70 feet, minnimum. That past land use dicisions have allowed development to constrain the waterway . should not be sufficient justification to allow for additional impacts . The Fanno Creek system is presently functioning at a very low level . We believe that actions that occur within the 70 foot riparian buffer should focus on increasing the biological functions of the natural system. Locating the pathway within the riparian buffer is a permanent impact . The alignment fragments natural habitats and limits the restoration potential for the system. 3 . Item 9 . We agree with the applicants assessment of our proposed realignment in the origional comments. We would support an alignemnt that is moved even farther north than we origionally proposed. A' single crossing of Fanno Creek that parallels and is adjacent to the Grant Street bridge would minnimize waterway and wetland impacts and allow for connection to the existing path. 4 . Item 10 _ We stand by our existing comments . . See comment 2, above regarding past land use decisions . The fish and wildlife values should be given equal value with the needs of people . In light of the Upper Willamette River steelhead listing, we believe these riparian areas should be • restored to increase the functioning level of Fanno Creek to benefit fish and wildlife resources, including the steelhead trout . • • End of Review 40 RECEIVED PLANNING • MAY 2 4 999 . • CITY OF TIGARD • • ROBERT N . BOTHMAN 7365 S . W. 87TH Tigard, Or 97223 Phone 503 244 7206 Fax 503 244 7206 • DATE May 22 , 1999 ATTENTION City of Tigard attic: Duane Roberts • City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Or 97223 PAGES 1 • SUBJECT Fanno Creek Trail Improvements Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment • I am involved with the 12-mile Fanno Creek Greenway Trail at all levels of government ; Metro Regional Trails Committee, 40-Mile Loop Board Vice President , THPRD Trails Advisory Committee, my neighborhood CPO#3 Chair, and also the City of Beaverton. With the impacts of the containment of . the Urban Growth Boundary and growth of the county it is imperative that natural areas be protected and that the public have access to view and enjoy these areas . There is a balance between protection of these few remaining sensitive natural and wetland areas and maintaining the . quality of life for all who live along the Fanno Creek Greenway Trail . Many sections of the 12-mile trail have been built or are under design and construction, and interest in a major multi-purpose trail on the west side of the region similar to the Springwater on the east side and the Pensula trail on north side is building . This trail will connect parks , community centers , business areas and communities with a multi-use trail . I have reviewed the amendment and the • plans for segments 2 , 3 , 4, 5 , 6A and 6B. I have visited the segments and support the amendment and plans for these sections . • Kenneth R. Tolliver • 10200 SW Katherine Street Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 684-8200 RECEIVED PLANNING May 20, 1999 MAY 2 1 1999 CITY OF TIGARD Mark J. Roberts Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Written Comment on Fanno Creek Trail Alignment File Nos. CPA 1999-00001 & SLR 1999-00003 Dear Planning Commission: My family lives adjacent to part of the lands affected by the proposed amendments by Woodard Park. We are very anxious for the Fanno Creek Trail to be built in our 'backyard'. The construction and continued existence of the Trail should have minimal effect on flooding and wildlife. The plans for the portions of the Trail in the Woodard Park area were modified to reflect the concerns and ideas of adjacent property owners after several public meetings. I wholeheartedly endorse the Trail. The design in Woodard Park was planned to provide several environmentally friendly items. One is the possible creation of a wetland area in conjunction with some mitigation projects by the State Department of Transportation. Another is to keep most of the Trail well above the normal winter flow levels. I want you to know that at least one family is 100% behind the needed amendments that you are considering. Access to the Trail will increase the exposure of local residents to the natural areas along the Creek and help them to be more connected with it. Please approve the amendment requests. Sincerely, Ken Tolliver • • 10175 SW Katherine Tigard, Oregon 97223 May 18,1999 Duane Roberts, Project Manager 13125 SW Hall Blud Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Duane: We would like to express our support for the Fanno Creek Trail Rlinment Project. We were active in the planning of the recent expansion of Woodard Park and connecting trails were considered an important part of that plan. We are retired and walking and riding bicycles along these trails is important to us in maintaining a healthy life style. Being able to walk and ride on a trail with a natural setting rather than a roadway is an important safety feature for us. The concern for the wetlands should be taken seriously and everything should be done to protect them. lifter having worked with you on the Woodard Park Project we are sure you and your staff have done their best to accommodate both the trail system and the water and wildlife needs of the wetlands. We believe that the walking and bicycle riding trail system will add value to our community with minimal impact to sensitive wetlands. The trail system in Greenway Park in Beaverton, which we also use, is an excellent example of this type of wetland use. Sincerely ey R. Hamilto Margaret C. Hamilton NN IAJ SECRE TA Ry /tIATERIALS 9 fir . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING CRYO A FTIOARD Community Development • Shaping A Better Community • STA(1', OF OREGON ) County of Washington )ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for the City ofTiigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: (Check Appropriate Box(s)Below) ❑ NOTICE OF PENDING LAND USE APPLICATION FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director • ❑ NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director © NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT/ 6-7-99 & 6-22-99 ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer Q Tigard Planning Commission (6/7/99) O Tigard City Council (6/22/99) ❑ NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER NO. FOR: • ❑ AMENDED NOTICE (File No/Name Reference) (Date of Public Hearing) • ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director • ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer • ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council u NOTICE OF: (Type/Kind of Notice) FOR: i 1 (File NoJName Reference) (Date of Public Hearing,if applicable) A copy of the PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES) of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit" 3 on the 11th day of May,1999, and deposited in the United States Mail on the nth day of May,1999, postage prepaid./ • (P- soli-that Prepar9crN9tice) 111k before me on the ' day of ���� 19 Subscribed and sworn/affirmed y 7 ,�. OFFICIAL SEAL ` S ASIR': �� . i , w�rr,'f.� DIANE M JELDERKS ` I 'I' ' I � 1 1 tr7, NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ^_ ,,.,� COMMISSION NO.046142 • My Commission Expires: 9. 7/ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07,1999 7 • EXHIBIT -•-hL'�jl�� CITY OF TIGARD Community Devetopment Shaping Better Community PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BEFORE THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION ON MONDAY, JUNE 7. 1999 AT 7:30 PM, AND BEFORE THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ON TUESDAY. JUNE 22. 1999 AT 7:30 PM. THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. THESE HEARINGS ARE FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECEIVING TESTIMONY FROM THE PUBLIC ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NOS.: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA]1999-00001 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLRI 1999-00003 FILE TITLE: FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER(S): Various Owners Duane Roberts, Project Manager (List available upon request) 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 x347 REQUEST: The City of Tigard is requesting to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources overlay from 0.30 acres of wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, to allow construction of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Trail. Sensitive lands approval is also requested for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. LOCATION: 1S134 AND 2S102; Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over Summer Creek); Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Segment 3: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a bridge over Fanno Creek); Segment 4: Grant Avenue to Main Street along Fanno Creek; and Segment 5: Main Street South (has a bridge over Fanno Creek). ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3. THE COMMISSION'S REVIEW IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON THIS REQUEST. THE CITY COUNCIL WILL ALSO CONDUCT A HEARING ON THIS REQUEST PRIOR TO MAKING A DECISION ON THIS REQUEST. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.390 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION AND/OR CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT LAND USE PROPOSAL :,ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT RII EN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPO ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEA G. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRES 1 TED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM ..THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER MAY 17. 1999, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL' OF THE REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25 ) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARKJ._ROBERTS AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223. CITY of TIGARD• wow �.,. r, i_ _ riP. -I__Wit _ , III r --iii VICINITY MAP '- Alhilitirillik ��u 1 . -1r CPA 1999-00001 ���'13i;1�,,i: .4�I I- `` '" T" �1 CITY Of TIGARD _... ■.:■.:� 1111 ` : in.. �r'1 �, , ,,.. !1e11.. ....� _-�"wr 44.04 .I FANNO CREEK \\\`\ �� �7C ,.4W 4. .,, ��� O` TRAIL ALIGNMENT 1■ gip, ,•N `�if, 4%1 •I6Sub'ect properties -=:►I, yis,40 ,, •�` •, .l •••,- I are included in the %Pr` �� ♦� � \ ' ♦ trail alignment project i �I 1 111 ,• 4 ., * `�� 1 ��►. ,. ... Streams IlIn��.- • \�� ; ; o •� �� 44! MAJOR ,,,��'•,���oQ.�, 4 •� 1P �� tit. , /' MINOR ■ III �'l�D,.r ♦s.4.# 4∎• \\� �� "����,•r��!'���� ♦ `\:�` ,• A. ■Tigard Wetland Inv./ EMS A V. 9VLgt4 ♦ ♦i: ���`�� p• �.�♦ i.�■ mn :�� ' : `���V••i••♦inv.�,� .•` � ���� 1 0 .� as Far :• 1,...i,",': � 4-=_u \li i .fi ,__now �I II "11-•,.**00A*1■40,-.0.4 .�:�,.��, ,.,'�� .. ,�.'"■ City of Tigard !1 i m X11 , • I vivo 0.• ``V u'l���iillmi m=El 7 ,.,�,m .�.ou�aM� �r..� TouU.OR Yi223 _____ _ I CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT LAND USE PROPOSAL sss, tt� // `1' �� tt�lltttt� T.�t ■ —1111�■ �,11,111� �■��1�■"�-II�i I �:I al G A R D !' ,,�, ■�- -- ,MI 1111: �,`�� �% 1, �_� �l�� ■�_ �,MAW= II EMU � �� •• �� �I � �■ � �► NOTIFICATION ... 1111 �� �1 \ ■ 11■ �r �■ ■�■ ■� �..-F _■ Iii WV Jl<ia:p<I i AREA MAP ��� CMS' 11111: ■1!!!!hII1II!� �■-�L-p:�F �` Aiwa mils t .s oMn� .: ‘.- . . 9 :fir CPA 1 999-0000 1, �`�\�'�`�,iitiw REMi■ 1111►r d■I 1I 1 _- ■�� MEA�wl'tt ::° CITY OF TIGARD �Dii ; .•,I�0 FANN0 CREEK of � � . `1111 � i` �♦ ��� � ♦ , o� ��\t`G � , I•� *** 44 *.∎ T IL ALIGNMENT 3• ��� �`�1���� �.�,T,:,�`� ►. Subject properties 1 0 ils •�►! � !`°0` � � • ♦. .4.0) are included in the ■ WM AI �♦ m■■ 1111 ,� ',���� •��,,� 1 ��.�,.� •� t„ey,'■ � � trail alignment project I!IIIIUII % ov 4*./ * :4� ` ��. o. •- ' •ti ° I• . •II� �� \ A' ,` ' Streams►, ., ,'. *� � �4 1∎ ..���`�♦ 4♦ I // �/ , MAJOR 1!" p,,',�,�� "�� �' / ,.a��' 1r`t ��,'f ,, / . MINOR,,4. ., ...„4 ...Iv alio _0. ■ _,40,����.�Gr ■'II,■ �: �♦ ,, '��. \�LLLL`\s-4°. \'''.'4.' . �� Tigard Wetland Inv.s. ...----A. Insan.41 *St ,,k III ■ MIN.. ♦ • ``f \\\\ Arlfr --‘ . ' NIL ; e -,4*.ob„ „0:- 0, 4 In N ' 40141= rammor Rule N • .,. .--/ - - . .. . itx. , • ill -, ...--- -‘,. 4% - . . ,•■ „""'■ H �\\yr400 900 1200 Feet � :�`��I `_`alt___Ili • .■ ILI ld UM • ' , �� . 4∎1.6* •. �`�:.` 1111 ,.�_959 feat. 4..:4,0-1.. sum ilk. A O. 1 mi ■�� ,,1111 . ■I •74_•••. ��.� ♦es.�• �� 0 I. �a 1111■■■: .� ^�i ������ ♦�ka� �� O.._ .�� J Atka arlulag■A\:_ - E ,a�,00 , ,,. '�. 1111■, . City of Tigard ��,►������mil ■�� �, / ii i e � � i nil 1111 ■.11 MI:. �-./....,,, ♦ . 1111 �, ""' Information on this map is for general location only and rata ' 1♦24 � ' , ' 'II should be verified with the Development Services Division.MEIN VII e ♦ •• , ,_m, 13125 SW Hell Blvd ra a ■•111n*_ �•101 All111111111111 Tigard,OR 97223 II. Pau.. """t_ - 4• , . (503)939.4171 i ■■nh,nun .�,■....11111111 a .., ``∎`,■��,■■,■■■„■,■■■I■ummem • hrip://wewv.ci.ligard.or.us ' Cpmmunit Development Plot date: May 12, 1999;CAmagic\MAGIC03.APR 1111■.g�� m. �� ���■ fi t•wt., .- Z-� `'`N,:-..,=::111 _ �� ��� �■ T � ♦ �` �r �� : CITY 0fTIGARD ■���� ■����■ •11 ��11� ���► -1 - �_ .:� ��11 ■vol. , a. imi �, 0101 S \ ' it N. \ r GE OGR�PNIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ■vol.thiu■■■■■■r: - \ ��- •` \ IN Ilan= �1•�I�.■�i■■■■■■■■■�•-11111 ::i um��`\\%hdlla ■.......■11.:1;■■ Ti":►.unlin , `•`Z.� 1►y . -11■■ " iii 1111iiiumi11� WHIT ::11 1itj . ��- n -� ��\"'�.■■ �,�_ 1111 AREA NOTIFIED i I ►�■ N■ ■■ 4 ''1■ ` = g i\\\\\\`. 1 1_■ ■.,. 1111 ■ ■.11■ CI■ F.a Cy- ;\ l� Zi: (500 ) III■1111. �'�.G III.. .... ..iTr.�1.1►■ ■1 - - ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■11 111 1111 11 ■1111 • ■■■groin■■■ - ■111 wr - - rirre- �� ���,■■11-■� ■_�- - �■ . ■to �■■■■■■ 1il1��. :- SLR 1 999- d, C�cH:1! � • Cit of Tigard i■t- �� W I`�X11111' ■t . ■■L I- '_.�� ta- -- ,; �'� �.II►i ►111 11 I "I sal; . "MI-- Trail Alignment=Imp 441 bats./M NI BE - .�i�O������: : =s. Affi1.4■® g�_ ■�►► lilt■ ' - . Imo .1r �" .. 4ifp Am 1■■ 1111, tee: W. ••....� , ,,117 r`. .��� :,ire. `:Crs ■ nwsi�"'" �F�■�■9p male ► �\ 11■a.�1R1111111� r4��i� Dsli is� `a�1�♦`►��O��� ��♦O '� ,I ry I1 '■��1r per` -, • o . ' 0:44 t• i ,� 1:■ 1Ir Mil ■■■1,, ►411171 . "I,,�,� ® ■ ■r�.1 r• ♦��ewe '' , ♦ ■ �, v zpio' 111 anal ilillinlinil wilfk.; Wiritot49 4 '`' 400241,RO ■■ 11 #1 i 1ist , i ♦ • ♦� 0 0.11.. ;Ls ; -....■ . * 4. . 40- 4#--4/01‘ .. 4 . owl' 0 1,1 rip ;4.,-, Imilairm -7 0#4-4. 4P4 --.4' **-Agg& ,s, V " I* 1* 1111111:.■`I,IC mg yp■1i 111 III .�� , Ai4� ���►♦ � ' '1', :4 A A ■r 111E 1 _ ,0 :��i.� �O .. v�� S ■ N • in In y,� ��� �i#a -1111'■■►. ��� �* .+ * 1 ote. 4•1 ����1�1 .,�.�■■ I ■■11� , ~,�G�i�i�d►o° ►� 42; �r�.ing ■..4■AgrAIIIIIIIIMINII 1111.4,4 ■ -44 .- ,, e4\4t, ,,.=' , ' am Illffing1P.,..v 1- , --.„4N' opummum•go +. \ ,, -vir#,,,, *- ,N ,\.■• !;.$ • •• ♦ s/A� , 1111 .■ •� •e i�l :� '� �\ ��\ Ma is NOT Scale ♦ ►��������•�� ■■���1 �.■■.� I I��v Vit ��i� ., �;`` ` \, P��������.�� 1111■■� ■� i+ � ��I�I•�-►►�«�"`'i �'1■ � -ar.\; u LP� ■ .� ■■ice■ ■■ �� .0 At Aw # ��■■1�I ``:"°°::::: a \ o 500 1000 1500 Feel ._______. 1 /� I.iC is l�1 , ..��� �i ' � �� am rr.r, ' ,��■ Vii. 1` , "�■f°'i �w a 0� 1"=7182 feet ����1 P i■ ■■■■■■■■I:�■■■■■■■■n■p' ' ��0���/��% ������a■i Ib E s.: `� : ■ o n ti, 1111■■■■■�1 1■■1 1111■■. �,�,►a �. ..■■. ■_ I ff :a■■■■■.mi 4 ► S.�5,/III 11111II, ,®!e +k ':. .r• ..■■ — ■■■■■■.�s +• ...� ��■■i11�11111111'1��.�Mar\ti • •. ,11-- ■.. mn!I EN 4 I■■L■11 ■ii�\�=1111�', 1■��1��■■� ='��`�,,�11"t1'1 ' ,•��J�. �\ City of Tiard - - 1111■■.■ __,.: _��.••...� 1 II I�,d..,„■■,,,'! ■■m■■�a_, ^ -.,,` ♦ —`-” ����_',\ , Information on this map is for general location only and T """h_ �1■J 1-I ,. ■ ...■■.,"'.�r -.. Iron�11i��N,\\ should be verified with the Development Services Division.• • 1■ ■ - 11■1ui a■ 13125 SW Hall Blvd .g ■r Q:�■ v 111!im , ■■1111■`1 I „• _�— ��� Tigard.OR 97223 Ida 1111 ■■ J ■ 11■■ l ..1/ ' •■1■■■111111/ 503)839-4171 1111��r■:��/_�AMEN an EN ma �rl'• •111''"L' , http:hwvw.atigard.or.us Ctommunit}Development Plot date:May 7, 1999;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR • • EXHIBIT B 1 S 134DB-03700 1 S 134DB-03800 " LIVINGSTON BESSIE E TR BRAUN WILLIAM H JR&ANNE M 10970 SW NORTH DOKTA 10920 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1 34DC-00500 1S1 34 DC-03000 PARK PETER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.23J 11476 SW TWIN PARK PL 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S134DC-07600 1S134DC-09200 THOMPSON ROGER R AND CARLENE M STEWART PETER B&TRACY D 11760 SW GALLO AVE 11498 SW TWIN PARK PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S134DC-09300 1S134DC-09400 FREDERICKSON ANDREW J/CATHY& JONES CHARLES B JR/CATHYANN 11514 SW TWIN PARK PLACE • 11536 SW TEIN PARK PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 134DC-09500 1 S134DC-09600 SHEELER CHARLES W&KATY L BRYANT DONNA J&ROSS A 11558 SW TWIN PARK PL 11545 SW CORNELL PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 134DC-09700 1 S 134DC-09800 LOWE LARRY C&ROSE M EIDSON DONALD L AND MARY H 11523 SW CORNELL PL 11501 SW CORNELL PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S134DC-09900 1 S134DC-10000 ADAMSKI CURTIS R PHAM MYDUNG T& 4109 FIR ST 11463 SW CORNELL PL VANCOUVER,WA 98660 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 134DC-10100 1 S 134DC-10200 WHITTAKER JEFFREY S&ANITA L TRAPP JAMES THOMAS&DEBBIE LOU 11452 SW CORNELL PL 11474 SW CORNELL PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 1 S134DC-10300 1 S134DC-10400 BOWKER LEANNE MARIE WHIFFIN SHARON K 11496 SW CORNELL PL 11512 SW CORNELL PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 134DC-10500 1 S 134DC-10600 COBURN KELLY E&TERRIA L BERNARD KYLE L&LISA B 11534 SW CORNELL PL 11556 SW CORNELL PL TIGARD,OR 97223. TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 1 S 134DD-00100 1 S 134DD-00101 ' RICHARDS JAMES E&SHARON S BUCHANAN MICHAEL R&SHEILA M 520 SW 6TH#400 10525 SW TIGARD ST PORTLAND,OR 97204 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S134DD-00102 1S Fib 00///a SCHAEFER DONALD M&MILYNN 0 �-44 PO BOX 23697 TIGARD,OR 97281 T •r 23 1 S 134DD-00300 1 S 134D D-00400 • MAI HIEP BURGHARDT JOSEPH W 10755 SW TIGARD ST 10805 SW TIGARD AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 134DD-00501 1 S 134DD-00502 FITZGERALD ROBERT A AND BURGHARDT THOMAS&AMY 10835 SW TIGARD AVE 10823 SW TIGARD ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 134DD-00700 1 S 134DD-00800 BERNHARD MARILYN RAE EVANS ROBERT A AND LAUREL A 10895 SW TIGARD ST 10905 SW TIGARD ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 134DD-00900 1 S 134DD-01000 SCHOOL DISTRICT 23J SCHOOL DISTRICT#23-J 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S134DD-01100 1 S134DD-01200 ANDERSON GERALD L DILSAVER DANIEL E AND 11645 SW TIEDEMAN RD 11675 SW TIEDEMAN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 134DD-01300 1 S 134 DD-01400 BOYCE ANA L&RONALD J NABORS FORREST A P 0 BOX 23093 11755 SW TIEDEMAN AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 ' TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S134DD-01500 1S134DD-01600 VAN DOORNINCK WOLTER H POPE STEVEN R ALICE E 6555 SW DALE AVE 2120 NW 135TH BEAVERTON,OR 97005 PORTLAND,OR 97229 1S134DD-01700 1 S134DD-01800 NOFZIGER KENNETH RICHARD CHAPUT MARCEL J 11835 SW TIEDEMANN 11935 SW TIEDEMAN AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 1 S 134DD-01900 1 S 134DD-02000 ' HULSE CARL V AND ALEXANDER FERD W&NATALIE S 11401 SW 107TH PL 11423 SW 107TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 1 S 134DD-02100 1 S 134DD-02200 HEATH ROGER C AND DIANNE S ALEXANDER FERD F&CATHERINE M 11445 SW 107TH PLACE 21820 SW ELWERT RD TIGARD,OR 97223 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 1 S 134DD-02300 1 S 135CB-00400 ALEXANDER FERD F AND PASCUZZI ARTHUR 21820 SW ELWERT RD 10250 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CB-00500 1 S 135CB-00600 PASCUZZI ARTHUR AND PASQUALE MCCALL PROPERTIES INC 10250 SW NORTH DAKOTA ST 808 SW 15TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97205 1 S 135CC-00200 1 S 135CC-00300 JACKSON PAUL R CHITTENDEN LLOYD A EVELY 10250 SW TIGARD ST 11600 SW TIEDEMAN AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CC-00400 1 S 135CC-00500 SHADBOLT LEE J AND TAMARA A STOVER LAWRENCE W&SHARON A 11640 SW TIEDEMAN AVE 13432 SW 136TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CC-00600 1 S 135CC-00700 CHANEY CORALYN A WATANABE OSAMU AND SUWAKO 11730 SW TIEDEMAN 11770 SW TIEDEMAN AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CC-00701 1 S 135CC-00702 DAVIS DANIEL F&GEORGIA D& RIFFEL ALLEN W&SUSAN A 11764 SW TIEDEMAN AVE 11742 SW TIEDEMAN AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CC-00703 • 1 S 135CC-00800 DAVIS DANIEL F&GEORGIA D BOWSHER CHARLEY L 11764 SW TIEDEMAN AVE 11820 SW TIEDEMAN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CC-00900 1 S 135CC-01000 SERFLING LOWELL C/ALICE R HOLLAND SHARI&SCOTT 10455 SW MEADOW 10425 SW MEADOWS ST TIGARD,•OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • • . . • 1 S 135CC-01100 1 S 135CC-01200 BRAUN STEVE&ANGELA SZYDLOWSKI DOROTHEA L 10395 SW MEADOW 10365 SW MEADOW ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 • 1S135CC-01300 1S135CC-01400 • ZWERLING ADAM J& SLAGLE JOHN D AND 10325 SW MEADOW ST 10305 SW MEADOW ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 1 S 135CC-01500 1 S 135CC-01600 • NELSON BETTY JANE&ROBERT EUGE FAUGEROUX LUC MARC&JULIE A 10275 SW MEADOW ST 10272 SW MEADOW ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CC-01700 1 S 135CC-01800 • O'DOHERTY DENNIS AND SUDENGA CHARLENE M 10270 SW MEADOW 10300 SW MEADOW ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 1S135CC-01900 1S135CC-02000 PYLE ROY W&MARY LOUISE TRUSTE VALDEZ STEVEN M& 10330 SW MEADOW 10360 SW MEADOW ST • TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CC-02100 1 S 135CC-02200 EDWARDS GERALD R LAUREL ALLISON LARRY D AND . 10390 SW MEADOW ST 10420 SW MEADOW • TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CC-02300 1 S 135CC-02400 KOBLEGARDE B RUPERT BIEDERMAN BRIAN E&BEVERLY J 1130 SW MORRISON ST 10480 SW MEADOW • PORTLAND,OR 97205 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CC-02500 1 S 135CC-02600 ZWINGRAF JOSEPH R PATRICK PAUL C 10265 SW KATHERINE ST 10235 SW KATHERINE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 . TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CC-02700 1 S 135CC-02800 SLYTER ROBIN S AND SUSAN D HAMILTON DEWEY R M C 10205 SW KATHERINE ST 10175 SW KATHERINE TIGARD,OR 97223 • TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135CC-02900 1 S 135CC-03000 • HAMILTON JUDITH M SANG JAMES 10145 SW KATHERINE 10135 SW KATHERINE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • • 1S135CC-03100 1S135CC-03200 KRASAUSK PAUL& TRUJILLO BERNARDINO&EVA C PO BOX 5931 10030 SW TIGARD ST BEAVERTON,OR 97006 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CC-03300 1 S 135CC-03400 BROOKER FRED&HARRIETT RIISE ANN M 10060 SW TIGARD ST 10120 SW TIGARD ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135CC-03500 1 S135CC-03600 ANDERSON EDWARD J WEBB ROBERT LEE 10130 SW TIGARD ST 10140 SW TIGARD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CC-03700 1 S 135CC-03800 ALFORD BURT W&PATRICIA M ALFORD BURT W PATRICIA 10180 SW TIGARD ST 10180 SW TIGARD ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S1 35CC-03900 1 S 135CC-04000 . ALFORD BURT W MCCALL PROPERTIES INC 10180 SW TIGARD ST 808 SW 15TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97205 1 S135CD-01400 1S135CD-03900 KOSKI ALICE M&STEVEN J TRS HOUSING AUTHORITY OF 11735 SW 98TH 111 NE LINCOLN ST#200-L TIGARD,OR 97223 HILLSBORO,OR 97124 1 S 135CD-05300 1 S 135CD-05400 GRAHAM GARY L AND LONDON SQUARE HOMEOWNERS 9743 SW LONDON CT 1 SW COLUMBIA ST STE 555 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97258 1S135CD-05500 1S135CD-06300 • NAPIER JANICE D WHITE GREGORY L&MAUREEN P 9700 SW LONDON CT 9716 SW LONDON CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135CD-06400 1S135CD-06500 MORTON DEBRA D ORINGDULPH LYNN ALLISON 9718 SW LONDON CT 9720 SW LONDON CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-06600 1 S 135CD-06700 STUART CYNTHIA K LINDSEY RONALD G 9722 SW LONDON CT 9724 SW LONDON CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 1S135CD-06800 1S135CD-06900 ANDREWSON THORPE EILEEN PIACENTINI ANNE MARIE 9726 SW LONDON CT 9728 SW LONDON CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-07000 1 S 135CD-07100 MORRIS GREG&EVDOXIA BRINK LOIS M 9730 SW LONDON CT 9721 SW LONDON CT • TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-07200 1 S 135CD-07300 CHOY MARIANNE CLARKE SHERI L AND 13434 BANNING ST 9717 SW LONDON CT FONTANA,CA 92336 • TIGARD,OR 97223 1S135CD-07400 1S135CD-07700 RADCLIFF NAOMI A ALBERTSON CAROLINE CONNOLLY& 9715 SW LONDON CT 1599 SW UNDERHILL RD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 1 S 135CD-07800 1 S 135CD-07900 TWEDT DOUGLAS S AND LEWIS JENIFER J 9733 SW LONDON CT 9731 SW LONDON CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S135CD-08000 1S135CD-08100 MURRAY SANDRA L VANDOMELEN ANTHONY AND 9732 SW LONDON CT 28610 NW EVERGREEN TIGARD,OR 97223 HILLSBORO,OR 97124 1 S 135CD-08200 1 S 135CD-08300 MICKAELSON NELS E&DIANA S ANDERSEN STUART R 9736 SW LONDON CT 9738 SW LONDON CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1 S 135CD-08400 1 S 135CD-08500 GANN KIM L HALL SIEGLINDE 9740 SW LONDON CT 9747 SW LONDON SQUARE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 1 S135CD-08600 1 S135CD-08700 WORNATH BRIAN L&CINDY E MATRIX DEVELOPMENT CORP 9790 SW LONDON CT 6900 SW HAINES RD TIGARD,OR 97223 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S 102AB-00207 2S 102AB-01800 • CONNOR RALPH A GREEN VALLEY DEVELOPMENT LLC 9535 SW COMMERCIAL 10585 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S102AB-01801 2-\1.42AB-01 RISBERG K JOAN TRUSTEE TIGAA''. ,�, OF 4210 IMPERIAL DR 131 �i'�=>' WEST LINN,OR 97068 T RD,OR 3 2S102AB-01900 2S102AB-01901 ALLRED DOUGLAS R MAWHIRTER ARLIE L TR 5820 SW CHESTNUT 9265 SW MCDONALD ST BEAVERTON,OR 97005 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102AB-01902 - 25102AB-02000 ATLAS LAND COMPANY FINKE ALEX AND LOTTI AND 9380 SW TIGARD PO BOX 23562 TIGARD,OR 97223 _ TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AB-02100 2S102AB-02200 FINKE ALEX AND LOTTI AND CACH GERALD C JOAN L PO BOX 23562 12525 SW MAIN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AB-02300 2S102AB-02400 HANSON DONALD E HANSON DONALD E&SHIRLEY PO BOX 12 PO BOX 12 WELCHES,OR 97067 WELCHES,OR 97067 2S102AB-02401 2S102AB-02402 HANSON DONALD E ANKELE MARVIN R&KATHRYN J POBOX12 12511 SW MAIN WELCHES,OR 97067 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AB-02800 2S102AB-03100 ,THOMPSON DENNIS C CHRISMAN RICHARD&HEATHER TRS 9523 SW 62ND DRIVE 940 UPPER DEVON LN PORTLAND,OR 97219 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S102AB-03300 2S102AB-03400 FISHER DONALD D AND MCCLURE CHARLES J AND 9295 SW ELECTRIC STREET 9250 SW TIGARD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AB-03500 2S102AB-03900 ERDMAN TERRANCE E AND CAPISTRANO NICHOLAS III 12405 SW MAIN ST 12370 SW MAIN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AB-04000 2S102AB-04100 PFAENDLER ROBERT F AND SPEEDY LINGUINE INC 12380 SW MAIN ST 5405 SW JEAN RD TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S102AB-04200 2S102AB-04290 CAPISTRANO NICOLAS III CAPISTRANO NICHOLAS III 12370 SW MAIN ST 12370 SW MAIN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AB-04300 2S102AB-04400 CACH GERALD C&JOAN L MARR ROBERT M 12525 SW MAIN 12420 SW MAIN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25102AB-04500 25102AB-04600 , CACH GERALD C&JOAN L PEREZ JOSE EVODIO POZOS 12525 SW MAIN 12442 SW MAIN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AB-04700 2S102AB-04800 OLD STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE CAPISTRANO NICOLAS N&CHRISTIN 12525 SW MAIN 6646 SW 35TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97221 2S102AB-05000 2S102AB-05100 MCDAID MARGARET COOLEY MARK R AND 9225 SW BURNHAM ST 12525 SW MAIN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AB-05200 2S102AB-05300. FURRER&SCOTT REAL ESTATE JB OAK HILL LIMITED.PARTNERSHIP 9185 SW BURNHAM RD 9169 SW BURNHAM TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S102AB-05301 2S102AB-05302 STEVENS PAGE WISE RONALD H& 9180 SW BURNHAM ST 6186 ROSEMEADOW LN NE • TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97301 • 25102AB-05700 2S102AB-05800 OREGON STATE OF TIGARD AREA CHAMBER OF • 411 TRANSPORTATION BLDG 12420 SW MAIN ST SALEM,OR 97310 TIGARD,OR 97223 2AB-05•!0 2S102AC-00100 TI OF LEE STEPHEN AND 13,1e. 44900 NW STAR ST A D,OR 23 BANKS,OR 97106 25102AC-00200 2S102AC-00201 STEVENS PAGE N CASA LA VETA ASSOCIATES& 9180 SW BURNHAM ROAD PO BOX 5886 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97228 • 2S102AC-00202 :v2AC-00203' SOUTHWEST PORTLAND TI-- .•,•' OF 2121 N COLUMBIA BLVD 131 .• L BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97217 T �-•RD,OR 'y VC-00 14 2S102AC-00300 TIG• '• , Y OF DOLAN&CO LLC 13 \ • .,� 4025 SE BROOKLYN -oARD,OR 97 PORTLAND,OR 97202 2S102AC-00400 2S102AC-00500 DOLAN&CO LLC WOODARD CHARLES L AND 4025 SE BROOKLYN PO BOX 23303 PORTLAND,OR 97202 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102AC-00600 2S102AC-00700 VERMILYE JEAN S TRUSTEE DOLAN&CO LLC 11272 SW CAPITOL HWY 4025 SE BROOKLYN PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97202 2S 102AC-00800 2S 102AC-00900 HEUVELHORST MICHAEL J DAVIS EUGENE L&VIVIAN M 12551 SW MAIN ST 10875 SW 89TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AC-01000 2S102AC-01100 GRITZBAUGH BRADLEY&FRANCINE SORG OTTO PO BOX 1366 PO BOX 2971 BEAVERTON,OR 97075 PORTLAND,OR 97208 2S 102AC-01101 2S 102AC-01700 HAMMOND DAVID E&CHRISTINE N GOSPODINOVIC ROSE 3015 SW 116TH 12770 SW PACIFIC HWY BEAVERTON,OR 97005 TIGARD,OR 97223 25 102AC-01701 2S 102AC-01703 WOODLEY JAMES R&ELIZABETH F SPRINGER JERRY C 5150 NW VALLEY CT 7400 SW FAIRWAY DR CAMAS,WA 98607 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 2S102AC-01704 2S102AC-01800 SPRINGER JERRY C GILSDORF ROBERT M 7400 SW FAIRWAY DR PO BOX 61772 WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 VANCOUVER,WA 98666 2S102AD-01300 2S102AD-01400 WYATT DEWEY HENDERSON JACK R&MARY S 9095 SW BURNHAM 9075 SW BURNHAM ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S102AD-01501 2S102AD-01600 SPOHN NANCY D SCOTT JERRY D&NATALIE C 9053 SW BURNHAM ST .10060 SW PICKS CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102AD-01700 2S102AD-02200 ZUBER JOHN H BURNHAM BUSINESS&STORAGE LLC 9025 SW BURNHAM 9500 SW BARBUR BLVD STE 300 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S102AD-02400 2S102AD-02700 - OVERFLOW CORP MILLER RICHARD L 8950 SW BURNHAM ST 8970 SW BURNHAM TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2;•2AD-0280 2S102AD-02900 TIG• F KEEFER MARION W 131 "''BLVD 12555 SW HART RD D,OR 972 BEAVERTON,OR 97008 2',02AD-0 y 2 2S 102AD-03100 TIG:`‘^-4/Y OF CORDIER CHARLES F/BEVERLY J TRS 1. ! L 1945 N CARSON ST#603 ARD,OR`'= CARSON CITY,NV 89701 2S102AD-03200 2S102BA-00100 WALTON S D&DARLENE E KELLER EVA G 10955 SW BLACK DIAMOND 11975 SW 95TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BA-00300 2S102BA-00301 WILSHIRE REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP WILSHIRE REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP 1776 MADISON ST 1776 MADISON ST PORTLAND,OR 97205 PORTLAND,OR 97205 2S102BA-00302 2S102BA-00303 WILSHIRE REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP WILSHIRE REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP 1776 MADISON ST 1776 MADISON ST PORTLAND,OR 97205 PORTLAND,OR 97205 2S 102BA-00304 2S 102BA-00390 WILSHIRE REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP MCCALL PROPERTIES INC 1776 MADISON ST 808 SW 15TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97205 cPORTLAND,OR 97205 2S102BA-00400 2S102BA-00500 ROBERTSON BERWYN A&INGE BURG H CASTILE JAMES&AUDREY 6111 SW LURADEL 8100 SW DURHAM RD PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97224 - • • • 2S102BA-00501 2S102BA-00600 SNYDER DAROLD D SUE A MULL GREGORY S AND 12937 WATER GAP RD 19350 SW POMONA DR WILLIAMS,OR 97544 BEAVERTON,OR 97007 2S102BA-00800 2S102BA-00900 SEE-ZER PROPERTIES MORRIS SHIRLEY A&RAYMOND L 26785 SW NEILL RD 12340 SW BROOKSIDE NEWBERG,OR 97132 TIGARD,OR 97223 25102BA-00901 2S102BA-01000 ENGEL GEORGE L GREEN VALLEY DEVELOPMENT LLC 9380 SW TIGARD AVE 10585 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25102BA-01100 25102BA-01190 HAYS THOMAS R&LORI J ELKINS ALVIN S& 12220 SW GRANT AVE 1730 SW SKYLINE BLVD STE 107 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97221 2S102BA-01200 2 `'■2BA-0. @1 MORLAN PROPERTIES TIG� Y OF 5529 SE FOSTER RD 1 % �' L PORTLAND,OR 97206 o' ARD,OR 23 2S102BA-01300 2S102BA-01400 MORLAN PROPERTIES BALL ROBERT D 5529 SE FOSTER RD 2255 NW JOHNSON STE#1 PORTLAND,OR 97206 PORTLAND,OR 97210 2S102BA-01500 .' I2BA-01 BERNARD BRADLEY S&JENNIFER L TI ? " OF PO BOX 23605 13 TIGARD,OR 97281 4.ARD,OR 97 3 2S102BA-01502 25102BA-01503 CEGELKA KRISTIN& BERNARD BRADLEY S&JENNIFER L 12330 SW GRANT AVE PO BOX 23605 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S102BA-01600 2S102BA-01601 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC 121 SW SALMON ST 121 SW SALMON ST PORTLAND,OR 97204 PORTLAND,OR 97204 ..102BA-017' 2S 102BA-01800 TI t`!\ OF POOLE ANNE M AND 131 16449 DEARBORN ST ARD,OR SEPULVEDA,CA 91343 • • • 2S102BA-01900 2S102BA-02000 WAGNER EDWARD AND MARIE G REED WILLIAM C& • 9885 SW JOHNSON ST PO BOX 12564 • TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97212 2S102BA-02100 2S102BA-02101 BORSCH LUCILLE HUGHES AND JONES MATTHEW Q& 9935 SW JOHNSON ST 9945 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BA-02102 2S102BA-02103 ENGH KENNETH A/SHELLEY L LOUGHRAN THOMAS R& 9955 SW JOHNSON STREET 9965 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BA-02200 2S102BA-02300 STROUM DONALD M& ENRIGHT BRENDAN 9975 SW JOHNSON ST 21028 HWY 99E NE TIGARD,OR 97223 AURORA,OR 97002 • 2S102BA-02500 2S102BA-02600 STROUM DONALD M&ANDREA J LOGAN MARTA R 12380 SW GRANT AVE 12394 SW GRANT AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 2S102BA-02700 2S102BA-02800 CORCORAN-DUDLEY ELAINE JEFFRIES-BOWMAN ANDREA M 3929 SW FRIAR RD 9801 SW JOHNSON TOPEKA,KS 66610 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BA-02900 2S102BA-03000 • JOHNSTON DOROTHY E TR SINGH MAIHEN AND ARUNA 14335 SW 114TH 9777 SW JOHNSON TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S102BA-03100 2S102BA-03200 ROJAS MARIA SCHWARTZ JUDITH CAROL 12045 SW 95TH AVE 12053 SW 95TH PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BA-03300 2S102BA-03400 SANDERS GARY R& RASCHDORF DONOVAN L& 21730 SW ELWERT RD 12089 SW 95TH AVE • SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S102BA-03500 2S102BA-03600 SANDERS GARY R& SANDERS GARY R& 21730 SW ELWERT RD 21730 SW ELWERT RD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 • • 2S102BA-03700 2S102BA-03800 • SANDERS GARY R& SANDERS GARY R& 21730 SW ELWERT RD 21730 SW ELWERT RD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 2S102BA-03900 2S102BA-04000 SANDERS GARY R& SANDERS GARY R& 21730 SW ELWERT RD 21730 SW ELWERT RD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 2S102BA-04100 2S102BA-04200 SANDERS GARY R& SANDERS GARY R& 21730 SW ELWERT RD 21730 SW ELWERT RD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 2S102BA-04300 2S102BA-04400 SANDERS GARY R& SANDERS GARY R& 21730 SW ELWERT RD 21730 SW ELWERT RD SHERWOOD,OR 97140 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 2 yam_ •.w 'it 11I'PA'_ s3n'a �ll I1 �r..� -8 2S1 02B B-00100 2S 102BB-00201 CRESS SCOTT B AND DANA B FLEMING PASQUALINA TRUSTEE 9966 SW KATHERINE STREET 10060 SW KATHERINE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00300 2S102BB-00402 WOMACK MARLENE D BRACK RICHARD J DORENE 16869 SW 65TH#330 14100 SW 98TH CT LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102BB-00403 2S102BB-00404 DEROSSO DAVID LEROY AND JOHNSON CLIFFORD A&CYNTHIA LE 12015 SW KAROL CT 12045 SW KAROL CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 . 25102BB-00405 2S102BB-00406 BAKER HOWARD W DOROTHY M REEVES PAUL M AND GAIL 12065 SW KAROL CT 12085 SW CAROL CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00407 2S102BB-00408 • SCHMASOW WALLACE I AND PURDY JOHN T 12100 SW KAROL CT 12090 SW KAROL CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S102BB-00409 2S102BB-00410 BRICKEY JUDY F KRAUSHAAR STEPHANIE 12070 SW KAROL CT 12050 SW KAROL CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00411 2S102BB-00412 BRENNAN MABEL G CALCAGNO VICKI A 12020 SW KAROL CT 10130 SW KATHERINE STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00500 2S102BB-00501 TOLLIVER KENNETH RAY&ALICE E EVERETT ROBERT C&CHRISTINE M 10200 SW KATHERINE ST 10240 SW KATHERINE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00600 2S102BB-00700 METRO LAWTON MARY JANE 600 NE GRAND AVE 10355 SW WALNUT PORTLAND,OR 97232 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00800 2S102BB-00801 MCVICAR BARBARA W&KRISTIN A HAYS THOMAS RICHARD&LORI JEAN 10040 SW JOHNSON 12340 SW BROOKSIDE AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00802 2S102BB-00803 HAYS DAVID E AND MYONG S KARI JON A AND BECKY J 12370 SW BROOKSIDE AVE 12400 SW BROOKSIDE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00804 2S102BB-00805 CUMMINS BRIAN S HOLLAND CARL B&SUSAN D 12430 SW BROOKSIDE AVE 12460 SW BROOKSIDE AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00806 2S102BB-00807 LINKHART RICHARD FISHER DARLENE D 12490 SW BROOKSIDE AVE 12485 SW BROOKSIDE AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00808 2S102BB-00809 CUNNINGHAM LAWRENCE FROHNERT FRITZ E 10130 SW BROOKSIDE PLACE 10210 SW BROOKSIDE PLACE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00810 2S102BB-00811 WILSON ELDA E OREGON STATE OF DEPT OF VETS AF 10240 SW BROOKSIDE PLACE 10270 SW BROOKSIDE PLACE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S102BB-00812 2S102BB-00813 GRAVES MICHAEL R AND COFFMAN DENNIS D&RIE 10300 SW BROOKSIDE PL 10340 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00814 2S102BB-00815 ROBINSON JAY G&BRIGITA A JOHNSTON H RICHARD 12180 SW 127TH AVE 10365 SW JOHNSTON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00816 2S102BB-00817 KONARZEWSKI HILDEGARD HOOGENDAM KOLETTE M&SHANE M 10315 SW BROOKSIDE PL 10245 SW BROOKSIDE PL • TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00818 2S102BB-00819 BLAKELY EDGAR L CARLA J MAYFIELD ANNA CAROLYN 10225 SW BROOKSIDE PL 12405 SW BROOKSIDE AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00820 2S102BB-00821 MILLER TIMOTHY L AND DIX LOUIS G JR&KATHI A • 12375 SW BROOKSIDE 27330 SW GRAHAMS FERRY RD TIGARD,OR 97223 SHERWOOD,OR 97140 2S102BB-00822 2S102BB-00823 GAMROTH ROLAND R&MICHAEL L CHATFIELD WALTER H&THELMA J C 11455 SW HAZELWOOD LOOP 10345 SW JOHNSON TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00824 2S102BB-00825 STUART KATHLEEN M SOLARES EDGAR U& 10375 SW JOHNSON 10395 SW JOHNSON CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25102BB-00826 2S102BB-00827 KELLEHER DANIEL V&KATHRYN K KAMMEYER DALE R&CAROL M 10465 SW JOHNSON CT 10495 SW JOHNSON CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00828 2S102BB-00829 WEAVER PAULINE T TRUSTEE • WINICK HOLLY J 7865 SW BONITA RD 10470 SW JOHNSON CT TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00830 2S102BB-00831 VINATIERI ROBERT E JONES IVAN T&RAMONA M PO BOX 23771 6450 SW FISHER TIGARD,OR 97281 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 • •�4 BB-00:,2 2S102BB-00833 TIG• OF SMITH STEPHEN A&CHRISTINE D 131 t• = 10050 SW JOHNSON •RD,OR 9- 23 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00900 2S102BB-01000 SMITH CHARLES R&DEBRA D COCHRANE CHRISTINE M 10065 SW JOHNSON ST 10085 SW JOHNSON STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-01200 2S102BB-01201 • LEARY DAVID L AND JANSEN STEVEN J& 10020 SW JOHNSON 20633 SW ELK HORN CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TUALATIN,OR 97062 2S102BB-01202 2S102BB-01300 WATKINS CHRIS L&ROBIN L SHEARER EMMETT J/ELISE C 10010 SW JOHNSON 9980 SW JOHNSON TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-01301 2S102BB-01302 MURRAY JAMES A&MOLLY E KRAMIEN STANLEY R AND DEBRA L. 9982 SW JOHNSON ST 10000 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-01400 2S102BB-01500 BOGDEN ROBERT W AND SIMELE PAUL E& 9940 SW JOHNSON STREET 12583 SW 116TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-01600 2S102BB-01700 ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF HARRIS OIL COMPANY 2838 E BURNSIDE 2944 SE POWELL BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97214 PORTLAND,OR 97202 2S102BB-01800 2S102BB-01801 BEMIS THERESA TUBBS WILLIAM R JR&KIMBERLY K 12535 SW GRANT AVE 12531 SW GRANT AVE • TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 • 2S102BB-01802 2S102BB-01900 RATKAI KATALIN MOORE ROBERT C TRUSTEE • 6222 SW EDGEWOOD PO BOX 23098 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BC-00107 2S102BC-00108 BISSETT CRAIG ALLEN AND MCNAMARA MICHAEL T&JULIE M 10295 SW BROOKSIDE CT 10265 SW BROOKSIDE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S102BC-00110 2S102BC-02002 DIX LOUIS JR&KATHI OLSEN KENNETH E 12505 SW BROOKSIDE AVE 10640 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102BC-02004 2S 102BC-02005 WORRALL KENNETH W AND FRISBIE OWEN P JR AND 10680 SW FONNER 10620 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102BC-02006 2S 102BD-00100 EDWARDS ANNE D&HARVEY 0 ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF 10610 SW WALNUT ST 2838 E BURNSIDE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97214 2S102BD-00400 2S102BD-00500 ST ANTHONY'S PARISH FUNK JAMES H 9905 SW MCKENZIE 11600 SW 90TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BD-00600 2S102BD-00601 FUNK JAMES H FUNK JAMES H 11600 SW 90TH 11600 SW 90TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25 102BD-00700 25 102BD-00701 HOHNER TERRANCE AND SPADA FRED TRUSTEE 9830 SW MCKENZIE ST 72907 BEL AIR RD TIGARD,OR 97223 PALM DESERT,CA 92260 2S 102BD-00702 2S 102BD-01200 CARVETH JOHN/SUSAN K TOSCO CORPORATION 2215 NW 133RD PL PO BOX 52085 PORTLAND,OR 97229 PHOENIX,AZ 85072 2S102BD-01300 2S102BD-01400 TOSCO CORPORATION TOSCO CORPORATION PO BOX 52085 PO BOX 52085 PHOENIX,AZ 85072 PHOENIX,AZ 85072 2S102BD-01501 2S102BD-01502 MARCIENE TERRACE ASSOCIATES MARCIENE TERRACE ASSOCIATES 510 WAVERLY ST 510 WAVERLY ST PALO ALTO,CA 94301 PALO ALTO,CA 94301 2S 102BD-01503 2S 102BD-01600 GOSPODINOVIC ROSE TIGARD COMMUNITY METHODIST 12770 SW PACIFIC HWY 9845 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S 102BD-01601 2S 102BD-01701 DAVIDSON WILLIAM G&DIXIE L DAVIDSON WILLIAM G&DIXIE L 8915 SW COMMERCIAL ST 8915 SW COMMERCIAL • TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CA-00212 2S102CA-00213 GEHRING FAMILY TRUST KING PAUL M CATHERINE 13215 SW ASH DRIVE 13205 SW ASH DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CA-00214 2S102CA-00215 FORRETTE JOSEPH T& HAYNES GERALD G& 13195 SW ASH DR 13185 SW ASH DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CA-00216 2S102CA-00217 BRUNNER CHARLES W& GANOE L M 13175 SW ASH DR 13165 SW ASH DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CA-00218 2S102CA-00219 MCCOY MARVIN K&DORIS ATRS SCHMIDT ALFRED 13155 SW ASH DR 13145 SW ASH DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CA-00220 2S102CA-00221 ISMAIL FAHMI T JUNGVIRT ZORA 13135 SW ASH DR 13125 SW ASH DRIVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S102CA-00222 2S102CA-00223 • MCBATH JERRY R FAUSTI STEPHEN A&GWENDOLYN A 13115 SW ASH DR 13255 SW ASH AVE • TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CA-00224 2S102CA-00225 DIXON KATHERINE ANN& CHITTENDEN CYNTHIA A M 13227 SW ASH AVE 13195 SW ASH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CA-00226 2S102CA-00227 FORD HARRY L III&MAUREEN L PATTERSON RICHARD C&JANA L 13165 SW ASH AVE 13110 SW ASH DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CA-00228 2S102CA-00229 WALTER BURT L&ANDREA D SCHMIERER CLARENCE 13118 SW ASH DR 13130 SW ASH DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S102CA-00230 2S102CA-00231 CHRISMAN ELIZABETH A TR RASMUSSEN ERIC C 13140 SW ASH DR 9588 SW FREWING CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CA-00232 2S102CA-00233 SWANSON PRISCILLA BIGEJ STEVEN JOSEPH& 9560 SW FREWING CT 9540 SW FREWING CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25 102CA-00234 2S 102CA-00235 HILL ROXANNE W HASKIN SHEILA M 9520 SW FREWING CT 9525 SW FREWING CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102CA-00236 2S 102CA-00237 CUTSHALL DARRELL T STRAUSS DANIEL C AND 9545 SW FREWING CT 9565 SW FREWING CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CA-00238 2S102CA-00901 ELLIOTT KEVIN CAFFALL E REX III 13210 SW ASH DRIVE 13205 SW VILLAGE GLEN DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CA-00920 2S102CA-00923 ' ROME SANFORD M AND MARILYN G MATIA LUCIAN B&SIMONA 1780 E WILLAMETTE ST 13200 SW VILLAGE GLENN DR SHERWOOD,OR 97140 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CA-00924 2S102CA-00925 JOHNSON JAMES P&CHARLENE R KLINKENBERG EDWARD CARL& 13220 SW VILLAGE GLENN DR 13240 SW VILLAGE GLENN DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102CA-00926 2S102CA-00927 FREELS MARK H&KATHLEEN M HOUSTON MARK S&MARGARET L 13260 SW VILLAGE GLENN DR 13280 SW VILLAGE GLENN DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102CA-00928 2S 102CA-00930 COLE WILLIAM L ROWENA I REID CHRISTOPHER&JANE ELLEN 13300 SW VILLAGE GLENN DR 9315 SW LAKE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DA-00300 • 12DA-0••%I • SCHRAMM ANN M TIGA , OF 6292 PREAKNESS WAY 131,;% n . WEST LINN,OR 97068 -'- RD,OR 9�` • it S • 2'' DA-0$ 1 2S102DA-00701 TIG\ �r"�Y OF TIGARD CHRISTIAN CHURCH 131 ■te-• L 13405 SW HALL BLVD T •RD,OR •`223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2<•:• DA-01 .1• 2S102DA-00800 '���� /✓ TIG Y OF SCHALTZ RANDY A&MARGARET C 131 \" \ L 13335 SW HALL BLVD 3 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102DA-00900 2S102DB-00100 TOWER LANE B GTE NORTHWEST INC 13337 SW HALL BLVD PO BOX 152206-HQCO2E26 TIGARD,OR 97223 IRVING,TX 75015 2S102DB-00200 2S102DB-00201 BURNHAM BUSINESS&STORAGE LLC RITCHIE BRUCE E&BRAUNA R TRS 9500 SW BARBUR BLVD STE 300 PO BOX 19267 PORTLAND,OR 97219 PORTLAND,OR 97280 2S102DB-00203 2S102DB-00204 BUKRES ABDEL-HADI& BUKRES ABDEL-HADI& 9301 SW HILL ST 9301 SW HILL ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-00206 2S102DB-00301 RITCHIE BRUCE E&BRAUNA R TRS CARNEY GEORGE V&GWENDOLYN J PO BOX 19267 520 SW 6TH#400 PORTLAND,OR 97280 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2.•, 02DB-0y I 2S102DB-00601 TI �.,\� ,v OF STEINBICHLER GEORGE/SHARILYN M 13� +' =LL 8855 SW O'MARA ST • -D,OR • '23 TIGARD,OR 97223 25102DB-00602 25102DB-00603 GARVIN LANCELOT J JR& OTTING LOIS E 8915 SW O'MARA ST 8885 SW O'MARA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-00604 2S102DB-00700 CHAMBERLAIN DANICE LLOYD MCCADDEN JAMES&ONALEE 8825 SW O'MARA 3020 SW BROOKSIDE TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S102DB-00800 2S102DB-00900 PETERS PHYLLIS M CARKIN RICHARD E AND 13140 SW ASH S 13120 SW ASH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S102DB-01000 25102DB-01100 LOPEZ ANDRE J&JANICE R BARNES TERRY N GAYLE L 9400 SW HILL ST 13215 SW HILL CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-01200 .25102DB-01300 HERBERHOLZ ALBERT J AND LAWTON TOM K 13235 SW HILL CT 13240 SW HILL CT TIGARD,OR 97223 - TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102DB-01400 2S 102DB-01600 GOTT DANIEL R&JANE M CARRIKER RONALD P AND 13230 SW HILL CT 9340 SW HILL CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-01700 2S102DB-01801 JOHNSON PAUL E MILDRED DYGART VIRGINIA L 9300 SW HILL ST 13235 SW BURNHAM CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-01900 2S102DB-02000 LEWIS EVAN W&KAREN E KOLSBUN JOHN A&JANA COSTLEY 13245 SW BURNHAM CT 13255 SW BURNHAM CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102DB-02100 25 102DB-02201 NILSEN EDWIN R&GERALDINE E HAGERMAN DOROTHY K 13250 SW BURNHAM CT 13240 SW BURNHAM CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-02300 2S102DB-02400 MELHORN LLOYD A&CHRISTY L TOFTE TAMARA ANN 13230 SW BURNHAM CT 13588 SW CHELSEA LP TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-02500 2S102DB-02600 BOOOMS PAUL W HOUGHTON RAYMOND C II AND 13552 SW CHELSEA LP 2000 CONESTOGA LN TIGARD,OR 97223 - WEST LINN,OR 97068 2S102DB-02700 2S102DB-02800 TIMM CARREN A BYRNE JAMES G&DIANNE V 13488 SW CHELSEA LP 13454 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-02900 2S102DB-03000 GEMMILL WILLIAM&LESLEE J CAMPBELL JOHN A AND KAREN K 13416 SW CHELSEA LP 13404 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • S 2S102DB-03100 2S102DB-03200 MERRICK DONALD L&CAROL J KAUFFMAN JEWEL D 13376 SW CHELSEA LP 13348 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-03300 2S102DB-03400 WILLIAMS DOROTHY ANN KINNEY GREGORY D&KATHERINE D 13336 SW CHELSEA LOOP 13363 CHELSEA LP TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-03500 2S102DB-03600 ISOM DAVID BRYAN AND HOFFER SPENCER J&DANA L 13391 SW CHELSEA LOOP 13411 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-03700 2S102DB-03800 • GRUBAUGH VAUGHN F III& SCHLUETER DALE W AND JENNIFER J 13435 SW CHELSEA LOOP 13473 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-03900 2S102DB-04000 GRIZZELL ROBERT L&MADELINE C MCKENZIE DANIEL H 13509 SW CHELSEA LP 4201 SW HILLSDALE AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97201 2S102DB-04100 2S102DB-04200 • YUZON JASON B& MCKNIGHT A GARTH&DENISE L • 13571 SW CHELSEA LP 13181 SW CHELSEA LOOP " TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-04300 2S102DB-04400 PALMER THOMAS C AND SENESTRARO DEBRA C 13193 SW CHELSEA LOOP 13205 SW CHELSEA LP TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S102DB-04500 2S102DB-04600 WEGNER EDWARD L JR&JANICE K JOOBBANI DARYOUSH 13219 SW CHELSEA LP 14795 SW CHARDONNAY AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102DB-04700 2S102DB-04800 PHAY DARON J AND NANCY J GOOD HERBERT A&XIN C 13255 SW CHELSEA LOOP 13279 SW CHELSEA LP TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-04900 2S102DB-05000 HEDLUND TED B& MANN STUART&KAREN 13331 SW CHELSEA LP 13322 SW CHELSEA LP TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 S • . 2S102DB-05100 2S102DB-05200 HOLLOWAY ROGER K/BARBARA J MONROE JAMES G&CAROLYN D • 13310 SW CHELSEA LOOP 13298 SW CHELSEA LP TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-05300 2S102DB-05400 QUIGG TAD A&FERN G ROBBINS MATTHEW L 32005 SW CYPRESS RT 13262,SW CHELSEA LOOP WILSONVILLE,OR 97070 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-05500 2S102DB-05600 KEYS EDWARD MCCLELLAND& LEE BONG JIN&DONG SHIM 13244 SW CHELSEA LOOP 13226 SW CHELSEA LP TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102DB-05700 2S 102DB-05800 SANDINE FRED R&RUTH L CHING-HO-SUN 13212 SW CHELSEA LOOP 13200 SW CHELSEA LOOP TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-05900 25102DB-06000 STRAUS P A SMITH LANE C&DANA A PO BOX 3253 1293 DAPPLE GRAY LN BUTTE, MT 59702 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 2S102DB-06400 2S102DB-06500 COOLEY ERIC J&RUTH A ETTESTAD KEITH A/WILLENE A 9107 SW HILL ST 9125 SW HILL STREET TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-06600 2S102DB-06700 DIRKSEN CRAIG E& EICKHOFF DALE LYLE SR&RITA MA 9131 SW HILL STREET 9143 SW HILL ST • TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S102DB-06800 2S102DB-06900 FORSTER DAVID NELSON DOUGLAS S/JEANNE M 9155 SW HILL ST 9169 SW HILL ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-07000 2S102DB-07100 LAURIE PAUL ALEXANDER NORMAN C AND PO BOX 4458 9181 SW HILL ST SAN LOUIS OBISPO,CA 93403 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-07200 2S102DB-07300 WALKIEWICZ MICHAEL R COLEMAN ROXANE L 9199 SW HILL STREET 9215 SW HILL ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 i • 2S102DB-07400 2S102DB-07500 SAUERBREY ULRICH J&SUSAN S RICHARD MARSHA KAY& 9223 SW HILL ST 9241 SW HILL ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102DB-07600 2S102DB-07700 FATLAND BILL S/MARY SUSAN BAKER RALPH B&LYNN B 9259 SW HILL STREET 9267 SW HILL ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-07800 2S102DB-07900 GOODELL HAL L&JILL J RODGERS ROBERT J AND JOANNE L 9246 SW HILL ST 9238 SW HILL ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-08000 2S102DB-08100 EVEN RICK J/CHERYL L CAMPBELL THOMAS F/CARRIE M 9194 SW HILL ST 9176 SW HILL ST TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-08200 2S.102DB-08300 HONEYMAN JANE CATHERINE STANCIL DANNY R& 9148 SW HILL 9136 SW HILL ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S102DB-08400 2S102D8-08500 HOVDE ALLAN L&ALISON M MIZE LOA M&JON M 9114 SW HILL ST 9092 SW HILL ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DB-09100 2S102DB-09200 JIMCO CONSTRUCTION INC JIMCO CONSTRUCTION INC 33 SW 3RD 33 SW 3RD PORTLAND,OR 97204 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S102DB-09300 2S102DB-09400 JIMCO CONSTRUCTION INC JIMCO CONSTRUCTION INC • 33 SW 3RD 33 SW 3RD PORTLAND,OR 97204 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S102DB-09500 2S102DC-00500 DUCK CREEK HOMES OWNERS OF SCHMIDT JOHN G& 33 SW 3RD AVE 9000 SW OMARA ST PORTLAND,OR 97204 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102DC-00512 2S 102DC-00600 EARDLEY DIANNE& JOHNSON ROGER LOGAN& PO BOX 91278 8930 SW OMARA ST PORTLAND,OR 97291 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • S . 2S 102DC-00700 2S 102DC-00800 HAWKINS JEFFERY S LALLY DONALD P&BRENDA J • 8900 SW OMARA 8870 SW O'MARA ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S102DC-00900 2S102DC-01000 MILLER MATTHEW HOWARD& RUSSELL NORMAN L 8855 SW EDGEWOOD 8857 SW EDGEWOOD ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DD-01200 2S102DD-01300 AUMAN ALFRED W TRUSTEE KRAEMER JULIA A&MARK W 13615 SW HALL BLVD 230 SW ALICE ST TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S102DD-01301 2S102DD-01400 STATE OF OREGON HOLSTEIN MARVIN R/LORETTA R TRS 417 TRANSPORTATION BLDG 8710 SW OMARA SALEM,OR 97310 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S 102DD-01500 2S 102DD-01501 BLICK CARL J DONA JEAN O'FARRELL WILLIAM B&PEGGY JO 8740 SW O'MARA 3311 E MERCER TIGARD,OR 97223 SEATTLE,WA 98112 2S102DD-01601 2S102DD-01602 JENSEN DAVID L AND LOIS C TOKUDA KAZUHIDE AND 8840 SW EDGEWOOD 8870 SW EDGEWOOD ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102DD-01603 2S102DD-01604 HOLLAND RONALD P MARY L LASNIEWSKI WILLIAM L AND 8850 SW EDGEWOOD 8860 SW EDGEWOOD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-00100 2S103AA-00101 SWAN DONALD J&ELIZABETH E SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 23 J 12060 SW TIEDEMAN 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-00300 - 2S103AA-00301 THI VINCENT HINTZ SHIRLEY ANN 10975 SW WALNUT 11015 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-00500 2S103AA-00501 PICKAR RICHARD L COLLINS RANDY LEE AND 12130 SW TIEDEMAN AVE 12132 SW TIEDEMAN AV TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • 2S103AA-00800 2S103AA-00801 ROGERS THOMAS J&KRISTIN R FACKLER EDWARD D AND COLENE K 11045 SW ERROL ST 11030 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-00802 2S103AA-00900 OLSON RANDY S&NANCY TUMA DALE A/LINDA J 11015 SW ERROL ST 11000 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-01000 2S103AA-01001 LEHMAN DONALD A&KATHLEEN M NGUYEN ANH-TUYET 10965 SW ARROL ST 10980 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S103AA-01002 2S103AA-01100 KUBAS JAMES M AND TRAN NHANG V 10940 SW WALNUT 11174 SW SUMMER LAKE DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-01200 2S103AA-01300 KURTZ CONNIE PHAN LANH THANH 11630 SW MANZANITA ST 11174 SW SUMMERLAKE DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-01400 2S103AA-01401 SAVAGE FRANKLIN WILLIAM BUBLITZ RUDOLF F 10825 SW ERROL STREET PO BOX 230506 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S103AA-01500 2S103AA-01600 JUANSON BLESSILDA S&TOMASITO EDWARDS LES M AND MARCIA L 10860 SW WALNUT ST 10830 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-01700 2S103AA-01701 SCHERADELLA ARTHUR R AND TIGARD CITY OF 17937 S EDGEWOOD ST 13125 SW HALL OREGON CITY,OR 97045 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-01702 2S103AA-01703 PETERSON EMMA ALICE TRUSTEE POLLOCK DONALD E 17121 SW VERSAILLES LN 1834 SW 58TH#202 TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97221 2S103AA-01704 2S103AA-01800 ROSCH MERIDETH ANNE& HALL BRIAN E&IRENA M 10775 SW ERROL 10675 SW FONNER ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • • . 2S103AA-01801 2S103AA-01901 SUNDAY MELVIN R BARBARA HELMER GARRY L BARBARA S PO BOX 230995 10585 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97281 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-01902 2S103AA-01903 HATANAKA BARRY KUHN EDWARD T DIANE F 10625 SW WALNUT 10645 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-01904 2S103AA-01905 MARTINI ROBERT C AND YORK DANIEL UKATHLEEN S 10675 SW WALNUT 12350 SW TIEDEMAN TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-01906 2S103AA-01907 MARTIN RICHARD E RINGER JERRY L 12320 SW TIEDEMAN AVE 12325 SW 106TH DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-01908 2S103AA-01909 BRUGGER JUDITH C AND FLATTERS JAMES G 12355 SW 106TH 12385 SW 106TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-01910 2S103AA-01911 PEARSON RICHARD E&MARY ANN TR POITRAS JOSEPH E TRUSTEE 12330 SW 106TH DR 10515 SW JOHNSON TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25103AA-01912 2S103AA-01916 COOK JOHN E PANSY SANDERS STEVEN W 10455 SW JOHNSON 12390 SW 106TH DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-02000 2S103AA-02100 KESTER JOHN WILLIAM FERGUSON CAREY& 29475 DAVID LN 12240 SW 106TH DR NEWBERG,OR 97132 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-02200 2S103AA-02300 PRICE DONALD R&SHARON L REYNOLDS SCOTT E&LISA M 12250 SW 106TH DR 12260 SW 106TH DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-02400 2S103AA-02500 HARDY MARK 0&DENISE MACFARLAND ELSA TR 3125 SW VERMONT - 10325 SW CLYDESDALE PL PORTLAND,OR 97219 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S103AA-02600 2S103AA-02700 MANSFIELD TIMOTHY W KNOX CARL J 10515 SW CLYDESDALE PL 10505 SW CLYDESDALE PL PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 ' 2S103AA-02800 • AA-02.1 d THURSTON MILDRED TRUSTEE TIG•∎.',' OF 10495 SW CLYDESDALE PLACE 1312 f L BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 T -D,OR 9 3 2S103AA-03000 2S103AA-03100 SCHULZ ALOYS VERKAMP GEORGE H& 10485 SW CLYDESDALE PL 10475 SW CLYDESDALE PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-03200 2S103AA-03300 RAHANIOTIS GEORGE V MOSTUL CRAIG S&KENNA J 10465 SW CLYDESDALE PL 10450 SW CLYDESDALE PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-03400 2S103AA-03500 HEASLEY KENT W&DANA L LEWIS GARY JAMES&DAWNA L 10470 CLYDESDALE PL 10490 SW CLYDESDALE PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-03600 2S103AA-03700 LINDQUIST ROGER A MARILY ROGERS DEBBIE&JASON 10520 SW CLYDESDALE PL 12300 SW 106TH DR TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-03800 2S103AA-03900 MCDANIEL ROBERT D AND LANG DEREK J& 1339 CRUZERO ST 12285 SW 106TH DR OJAI,CA 93023 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-04000 2S103AA-04100 LEW ON YONG FOWN HAH BOYER SANDRA RAE 12255 SW 106TH DR 12244 SW CLYDESDALE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-04200 2S103AA-04300 HEWLETT CLIFFORD M AND DUNN STEPHEN W AND 12238 SW CLYDESDALE COURT 29572 AVANTE TIGARD,OR 97223 LAGUNA NIGUEL,CA 92677 • 2S103AA-04400 2S103AB-00100 KESTER JOHN WILLIAM SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 23J 29475 DAVID LANE 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY NEWBERG,OR 97132 TIGARD,OR 97223 • pg- 2S103AB-00406 2S103AB-00900 SMITH GARY C&ANNE H SANDERS CURTIS L AND 11275 SW WALNUT ST 12405 SW 112TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AB-01000 2S103AB-01100 ROGERS ANDREW D&ANGELO D KAHN STEPHEN M AND ANN L 11130 SW WALNUT ST 11100 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AB-01201 2S103AB-01300 BOYD H DEWITTE HARVEY DON A JEANETTE E 11070 SW WALNUT ST 12440 SW 112TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AB-03200 2S103AB-03300 ANZELLOTTI RALPH L& PAGE JOHANNES& 11942 SW 113TH PL 11976 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AB-03400 2S103AB-03500 CAPISTRANO DEAN B& ANDREWS STEPHEN D&ANGELA 12370 SW MAIN ST 12064 SW 113TH PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 3AB-04 I 6 3AB-04 10 TIG 'OF TI = Y OF 1312 L 131 TI RD,OR `3 T 'ARD,OR 97 3 2S103AC-02700 2S103AC-02800 BARRETT BRUCE E PIERCE DARREN F&AMY J 11105 SW ERROL ST 11075 SW ERROL ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 ii ■'o - �- `S !_ _ ■ CITY of TIGARD . ■ �� 1� , X11 ■ 1�.■ 1� � rm ■ ri , I" �� y .. . ■: ■■<-.� „ 0E00 RA A A,0 ,A FOR AATIOR ,AT EM-111.1 Rik 1111 - al." . e ' , _■IIi'�: . Ji g■i:..� VICINITY MAP !. N,"-N � Ira X111111 j�J -it!--■: C ■ • a: \•W: MUM =///� 1�: 1�� CPA 1999-00001 IV A ApiAlaill.1111k re It N .�, ..�..��■� .T,;:!1111 •. ■ 5. ■■-► vir _. CITY OF TIGARD ■� - -- - ..��\'"+�� a V■ 1111.. ' � {e._o \ ������r�"""'•� �tr■li� ■ 1111 �1 .', °��►►�`�\`�`��``��`-' ■■ 111 -� � `��-., � . '� '. �. I4►,�� , FANNO CREEK - �• , `�• • �, .� ••�i��'`������'!��♦� TRAIL ALIGNMENT las 10111y► 1:Will, �`� �' ,` ���A� , ` .► � 16 Sub ect properties ■�■ 1111■ � fir, are included In the �� •! *♦ ,. 1 .� . trail alignment project . IJIIii11JiiIi[: ! ' S P`'.'..♦ �I�, �� ,` ♦ Streams. 'Q MAJOR 91111111111111111 '���� -p #4 w. *♦ .. , \ ` . 664 " :� \ / MINOR■ -. e■ rtiroll f ... o �_� pry I.� ,• ` ♦ . ♦ • � � � � b'�"`������,d���■,�` ` �, ��` � `v'.�` � � - n Inv.I. ' , 1 �.��•���I �� �4♦ �� tO .• N\ \ Tigard Wetland • r v_____ ■■■■ al■._ °� "....S, MIN • ,' 111-1 .1i0EL ■Kitt ♦�i.. ..z0����• �� °'��■Ti1111 ■ ii11 i 'I�, : * " ,�,! ��,� . �, , �N• sr 0 400 600 1200 Feet ,1., • :.�I•■111.1 ■ ommp- �� ♦ I ����♦ ♦�! � ,� ``• ��I •,�.■ ,`• � . * .I\ `• \\`..A l pim 1 111 ■1 0! i RI��� ���"0 414 .d►;:t. \ 'L ■i °'• ■ `-'� 1111■■■_■ ■ �i ��`�� ���i �4 AV it �+ le� �� I . _,�� min ��. ♦0 ♦ ♦. S ifighba. .. ■"1�!_ = :.. Er I . telOi, ��',,. .r� .. RA „■■I CiryofTigard e1 ������� ■11 •./H �# A1111111111111111. IM ■■'W;N.'■■■■,' �.� ` ■ ■ norrnaon on this map is for general location only end = a• � . . le s eCommunity Development :May 12, 1999;C:\magic\MAGIC03.APR CPI ! '7-DU©O1 / r PIM CK:E&K- TKR-1C_ /9Li illEIVT L(7f o P c/LT( OL() ,2,3) 1S134DD-00900 1S134DD-01000 SCHOOL DISTRICT 23J SCHOOL DISTRICT#23-J 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY . TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AC-00200 2S102AC-00201 STEVENS PAGE N CASA LA VETA ASSOCIATES& 9180 SW BURNHAM ROAD PO BOX 5886 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97228 2S102AC-00204 2S102AC-00700 TIGARD CITY OF DOLAN&CO LLC 13125 SW HALL 4025 SE BROOKLYN TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97202 2S102AC-01100 2S102AC-01101 SORG OTTO HAMMOND DAVID E&CHRISTINE N PO BOX 2971 3015 SW 116TH PORTLAND,OR 97208 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 2S102BA-00300 2S102BA-00304 WILSHIRE REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP WILSHIRE REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP 1776 MADISON ST 1776 MADISON ST PORTLAND,OR 97205 PORTLAND,OR 97205 2S102BA-00501 2S102BA-01400 SNYDER DAROLD D SUE A BALL ROBERT D 12937 WATER GAP RD 2255 NW JOHNSON STE#1 • WILLIAMS,OR 97544 PORTLAND,OR 97210 2S102BA-01501 2S102BA-02000 TIGARD CITY OF REED WILLIAM C& 13125 SW HALL S PO BOX 12564 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97212 2S102BB-00600 2S102BB-00832 METRO TIGARD CITY OF 600 NE GRAND AVE 13125 SW HALL PORTLAND,OR 97232 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102BB-00900 2S102DB-00500 SMITH CHARLES R&DEBRA D TIGARD CITY OF 10065 SW JOHNSON ST 13125 SW HALL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103AA-00101 SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 23 J • 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 • • NOTICE OF ADOPTION This form must be mailed to DLCD not later than 5 working days after as •. ik ORS 197.615 and OAR Chapter 660, Division 18 0 See reverse side for submittal requirements O Jurisdiction City of Tigard Local File # CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 Date of Adoption 6/22/99 Date Mailed 6/25/99 Date the Proposed Notice was mailed to DLCD and Metro 5/10/99 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment X Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Land Use Regulation Amendment _ Zoning Map Amendment New Land Use Regulation Summarize the adopted amendment. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached." An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the Water Resources Overlay from 0.30 acres of wetlands as justified by an ESEE analysis for the construction of the multi-use Fanno Creek Trail. Describe how the adopted amendment differs from the proposed amendment. If it is the same, write "Same." If you did'not give notice of the proposed amendment, write "N/A." Same Plan Map Change From N/A to N/A Zone Map Change From N/A to N/A Location: Three sites along Fanno Creek between SW North Dakota Street & SW Ash Ave. Acres Involved: 0.30 Specify Density: Previous Density N/A New Density N/A Applicable Goals: 5 Was an Exception adopted?_ Yes X No DLCD File# DLCD Appeal Deadline • • Did DLCD receive a Notice of Proposed Amendment 45 days prior to the final hearing? (43 Days Notice) X Yes No ■ The Statewide Planning Goals do not apply Emergency Circumstances Required Expedited Review Affected State or Federal Agencies, Local Governments or Special Districts DSL. Tigard. Metro and the Army Corps. Of Engineers. Local Contact: Duane Roberts. Associate Planner Phone: (503) 639-4171 Address: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard. OR 97223 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ORS 197.615 and OAR Chapter 660,Division 18 1. Send this Form and Two (2) Copies of the Adopted Amendment to: Department of Land Conservation and Development 635 Capitol Street NE, Suite 150 Salem, Oregon 97301-2540 COPY TO: Metro Land Use & Planning ODOT- Region 1,District 2-A 600 NE Grand Avenue Jane Estes, Permit Specialist Portland, OR 97232-2736 5440 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 3 Portland,OR 97221-2414 2. Submit Two (2) copies of adopted material, if copies are bound, please submit two (2) complete copies of documents and maps. 3. Adopted materials must be sent to DLCD not later than five (5) working days following the date of the final decision on the amendment. 4. Submittal of this Notice of Adoption must include the text of the amendment plus adopted findings and supplementary information. 5. The deadline to appeal will be extended if you do not submit this Notice of Adoption within five (5) working days of the final decision. Appeals to LUBA may be filed within 21 days of the date Notice of Adoption is sent to DLCD. 6. In addition to sending Notice of Adoption to DLCD, you must notify persons who participated in the local hearing and requested notice of the final decision. • 241/irst, 120 DAYS=N/A CITY OF TIGARD Community Deve(opment Shaping BetterCommunit_ CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL Case Number(s): COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA)1999-00001 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLR)1999-00003 Case Name(s): FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT Name of Owner(s): Various Owners (List available upon request) Name of Applicant: City of Tigard - Attn: Duane Roberts, Project Manager Address of Applicant: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Location: 1S134 AND 2S102: Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over Summer Creek): Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park: Segment 3: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a bridge over Fanno Creek): Segment 4: Grant Avenue to Main Street along Fanno Creek: and Segment 5: Main Street South (has a bridge over Fanno Creek) Request: > THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS APPLICATION ON 6/7/99 AND VOTED UNANIMOUSLY TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL. ON 6/22/99 THE CITY COUNCIL HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE APPLICATION TO RECEIVE PUBLIC TESTIMONY AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION. THE COUNCIL VOTED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE REQUEST AS FOLLOWS: Approval to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources overlay from 0.30 acres of wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, to allow construction of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Trail. Sensitive Lands Review was also approved for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. Action: > ❑ Approval as Requested © Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of Record within the Required Distance © Affected Governmental Agencies © The Affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The Applicant and Owner(s) Final Decision: . THE DECISION WAS:SIGNED'ON JUNE 22; 1999,AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 22, 1999: The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. Appeal: A review of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) according to their procedures. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or the City Recorder at (503) 639-4171. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE CITY COUNCI (COVER SHEET) • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO.99- !7 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA 99-00001), SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR 99-00003), AND TITLE 3 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW, REQUESTED TO CONSTRUCT FANNO CREEK TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the applicant has requested approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the City's Water Resources Overlay, Sensitive Lands Review, and Title 3 Conditional Use Review to construct sections of the Fanno Creek Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail; and WHEREAS, on June 7, 1999, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the aforementioned land use applications, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval included in the attached Exhibit"A"; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 1999, the City Council held a public hearing and approved the aforementioned land use applications, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval included in the attached Exhibit"A." NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The proposal is consistent with all.of the relevant criteria as noted in the attached Planning Commission recommendation to the Tigard City Council, also referred to as "Exhibit A." SECTION 2: The City Council approves the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Sensitive Lands Review, and Title 3 Conditional Use Review, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval as set forth in the attached"Exhibit A." SECTION 3: Because the prompt implementation of this ordinance is necessary to complete the construction of the Fanno Creek trail improvements during the current building season, an emergency is declared to exist, and this ordinance is effective upon its passage by the Council. ORDINANCE No. 99-1-7 Page 1 of 2 • • PASSED: By UY\&Y11 hDUS vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this ?D` day of,/ ,( _ 1999. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council thisr2.D day of '99. es Nicoli, ayor Ap roved as to form: e Attorney (0. as •��t Date i:'citywidebrd\Fannotrai l.ord.dot ORDINANCE No. 99-1 Page2of2 : I EXHIBIT A 0 ,,:: ...; ,'a .°. "F' .. .�°. ^`-s`?"' ''''''4,4 c:`,"v' $«•;fi3�ilelt i;,;" =t r' ' ew` _'V"f s,114: ;.=' ".,=" .. _ ,-- STAFF REPORT- - z k p _ , ---} , �. ,� .. Y" j�. O � DNS Y- ;d -.;sw ¢3. �i fir°- ` `a .s" g 3 r „e aY't'e-- w.w.h;v :' 6 m +�+- ,�. "L,° ,�j Ic NE NNNGICOMMSION Y ', '" t fTYOFTIP ;4" fi :: FOR NE CITY®OF:TIGARDAOREGON4M . +g''''''''.e''', "•,I - >> � rr�x:...t` �,`�-'�".� y4 .� ; "-s x^x�i -c"°`�W �.'��.'?. "yF`°'" - �. Y`.'a b _ �'". ,' ' 15t :-;r is s3 s�i �� ;:'44'')-'"M':!;`' J � 'fir �,.r2.�.raT $.I- .•r „� p�.a'Y•.a�V 'Y �� Ii'{K/YW N...., .:,,EY °<`,,. o w.-,t.€:,., s'r@yx.. -g ? - .k„,, .,4... x.-.. ,?',..,u,e`,-- .. star.'4`8 .. 120 DAYS.= N/A • SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment •CPA 1999-00001 Sensitive Lands Review SLR 1999-00003 PROPOSAL: The City, as applicant, requests consideration of a Comprehensive Plan . ' Map Amendment to remove the Water Resources Overlay from small portions of three wetlands to allow construction of segments of the multi- modal Fanno Creek Greenway trail between SW Tigard Street and the SW Ash Avenue Extension. The combined area included within the wetland fills in question is approximately 0.30 acres. As part of this same application, the City requests Sensitive Lands, approval for trail improvements within the 100-year floodplain and Title 3: Water Quality, Flood Management, and Fish and Wildlife Conservation approval for a conditional use within the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone. APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: City of Tigard Attn: Duane Roberts, Project Planner 13125 SW Hall Boulevard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard • Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN . • DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential, Industrial, Central Business District. • ZONING • DESIGNATION: R-4.5, IP and CBD. - • LOCATION: Fanno Creek Greenway between Tigard Street and Ash Avenue Extension. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3 Model Ordinance. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION . taff;proposes thatthe--Planning°:Commission.recommend-APPROVAL`toahe CityC:ouncil. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 1 OF 13 • • • for the above request subject to certain Conditions of Approval The proposed findings and conclusions on which the recommendation is•based are noted in Section IV. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL F "E,yk.ia� Ph'c�„ iyS;t.==r`'y'° t:;';.:x>. .:r:K"._te� ,: -�"'".0-.`-°` q"K.'S�4,:'+.%^:± ;' :-€ :,°=w"_ °—i<.s>s`...+.`r-a2'n. a°e!.a.•.., _ - °+::a;•. ONDITIONS'SHALIL'BESATISF A . ... :•s, ... -.mow,';:. .�:.._x.: :� 1. Submit a copy of the permit approval from the Division of State Lands and US Army Corps of Engineers. 2. Install erosion control measures prior to construction. Erosion control measures may not be removed until construction has been completed. 3. Any fill placed within the floodplain shall be offset by an equal amount of excavation elsewhere within the floodplain portion of the project area. 4. Upon completion of construction, the Water Quality Resource Area shall be restored and maintained in accordance with the mitigation plan and specifications contained in Table 2 of the Title 3 Model Ordinance. - 5. To the-extent practicable, during construction existing vegetation shall be protected and left in place. Work area shall be carefully located and marked to reduce potential damage to the Title 3 Water Quality Resource Area. Trees in the Water Quality Resource Area shall not be used as anchors for stabilizing construction equipment. 6. Where existing vegetation is removed during construction, or the original land contours disturbed, the site shall be revegetated, and the vegetation shall be established as soon as practicable. Nuisance plants, as identified in the Metro Native Plant List, may be removed at any time. Interim erosion control measures such as mulching shall be used to avoid erosion on bare areas. Nuisance plants shall be replaced with non-nuisance plants by the next growing season. 7. Prior to construction, the Water Quality Resource Area shall be flagged, fenced or otherwise marked and shall remain undisturbed, except as may be required to complete the proposed trail improvements. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1983. The Comprehensive Plan includes a bicycle/pedestrian trail element that calls for a bikeway along Fanno Creek. The Comprehensive Plan and 1987 Tigard Park Plan identify the Fanno Creek bikepath as a continuous, off-street path that follows the route of Fanno Creek as it flows between the northern and southern city limits. Between the 1980's and mid-1990's, new development in the area of the Fanno Creek Greenway was conditioned to provide the bikepath as conceptually identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Within the boundaries of the present project, bikepaths have been constructed along the streamside edge of the Morlan Plumbing property and under the Pacific Highway bridge connecting to Main Street. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 2 OF 13 • • In order to add more specificity to the Comprehensive Plan designation, in 1997 the City conducted a technical study, with extensive public participation, to map the alignment of the trail from Tiedeman to Durham Road. In designating the most appropriate route, the study considered wetlands, soils, vegetation, wildlife, and topography within the greenway corridor as well as various social factors, such as neighborhood and employment locations. Vicinity Information and Proposal Description: The land uses along the two sides of the trail corridor consist of a school sports field, industrial development, commercial development, and older single-family residential development on 7,500 square foot lots. The boundary of the Greenway Corridor is coterminous with the floodplain. Over the years, significant encroachment and fill has occurred within the greenway Corridor, which is located within an older part of the City. With the exception of parts of three segments, the proposed trail segments consist of a 10-foot-wide paved pathway with two feet of shoulder on either side. This width is consistent with regional and state standards for the Fanno Creek Trail and is designed to provide for the safe passage of two bicycles approaching in opposite directions. The five segments are, from north to south: Segment 2: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (Fowler School Site) Wetland Impact Area: 11,250 square feet (SF) (750 linear feet); 52 cubic yards • (CY) excavation; 427 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Summer Creek Segment 3: Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park (Woodard Park Site) Segment 4: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue Wetland Impact Area: 1,995 SF (133 linear feet); 0.17 CY excavation; 117 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Segment 5: Grant Avenue to Main Street Segment 6b: Main Street South Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Total Wetland Impact Area: 13,245 SF (0.30 acre) or 833 linear feet of trail; 52.17 CY removal and 544 CY fill Three bridges are part of the project, and will span Fanno Creek (twice) and Summer Creek from top-of-bank to top-of-bank. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND PROPOSED FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: CHAPTER 18.775, SENSITIVE LANDS Section 18.775.020.0 states that Iandform alterations or developments which are only within wetland areas that meet the jurisdictional requirements and permit criteria of CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 3 OF 13 • • the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Division of State Lands, Unified Sewerage Agency, and/or other federal, state, or regional agencies. do not require a sensitive lands permit. The City, shall require that all necessary permits from other agencies are obtained. All other applicable City requirements must be satisfied, including sensitive land permits for areas within the 100-year floodplain, slopes of 25% or greater or ' unstable ground, drainageways, and wetlands that are not under state or federal jurisdiction. The proposal will impact wetlands that are under state and federal jurisdiction and, therefore, do not require sensitive lands review. Permit requirements of state agencies are addressed_ elsewhere within this report. The Water Resources overlay is applicable to the wetlands impacted by this project and is addressed elsewhere in this report. Floodplain impacts are addressed below. Section 18.775.020.E.2 states that sensitive lands permits shall be required in the 100- year floodplain when any of the following circumstances apply: • Ground disturbance(s) or landform alterations in all floodway areas; • Ground disturbance(s) or landform alterations in floodway fringe 'locations involving more than 50 cubic yards of material; • Repair, reconstruction, or improvement of an existing structure or utility, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure prior to the improvement or the damage requiring reconstruction provided no development occurs in the floodway; • Structures intended for human habitation; and • Accessory structures which are greater than 528 square feet in size, outside of floodway areas. The proposal includes ground disturbance involving more than 50 cubic yards of material in the floodway fringe. Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) 183.'120 defines "floodway fringe" as the area of the floodplain outside the floodway area. Therefore, sensitive . lands review is required for this project. ' Section 18.775.070.B provides that an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: • Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge; The project engineer has determined that the proposed project will preserve the floodplain storage capacity of the portion of Fanno Creek within the project area, that the zero-foot rise floodway will not be disturbed, and that the project will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 4 OF 13 • • • • Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the Comprehensive Plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.120 of the Community Development Code shall be allowed in • areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards; • The land within the project area is zoned R-4.5, IP, and CBD. Landform alternation is permitted in areas designated as commercial or industrial. The proposed use is community recreation and, as such, is an exception to the prohibition on landform alteration within residentially designated zones. • Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100- year flood The applicant has proposed to offset the proposed floodplain fill with an equal amount of excavation within the 100-year floodplain, so that the proposed alteration will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year floodplain. • The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as untimely; The proposed alteration is a pedestrian/bicycle pathway project that carries out the City pathway plan and the policies and objectives of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. • The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood; The applicant proposes to locate the pathway above the elevation of an average annual flood. • The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained; and The approval of the Division of State Lands has been obtained. A copy of the project permit has been provided to the City. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approval is pending. • Where landform alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of .a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The proposal under consideration carries out the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. - CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 5 OF 13 • • .. PROPOSED FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Planning Commission recommends City Council find that the proposal satisfies the approval criteria for landform alterations within the 100-year floodplain. WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (18.797.080) This Chapter has standards for sites identified as significant on the Tigard Wetlands and Stream Corridors Map. The standards identify Fanno Creek as a Major Stream, which requires a 50-foot setback from top-of-bank or the upland edge of associated wetlands. Table 18.797.2 identifies water related recreation facilities and trails as a "Type I allowed use with mitigation" within the riparian setback area. However, any landform alteration within wetlands in the Water Resource overlay is prohibited. Section 18.797.140 states that in order to develop within wetlands, a Comprehensive Plan amendment is required. This section addresses the applicable criteria for construction of the trail in the riparian setback area and for the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Section 18.797.060.A states that, for Type I uses, the applicant shall prepare a plan that demonstrates that the use will be constructed and located so as to minimize grading, native vegetation removal, and the area necessary for the use. The Director may require additional information where necessary to determine WR district boundaries or to mitigate identified impacts from a proposed development, including but not limited to: • Site survey as prescribed in Section 18.797.060B; The applicant has submitted a site survey completed by certified land surveyors. • One or more of the reports described in Section 18.797.060D. The applicant has submitted a topographic survey as conducted by David Evans and Associates along with a technical study prepared by Fishman and Associates addressing the vegetation removal and grading associated with the proposed and alternative trail alignments. The proposed alignment minimizes natural vegetation removal and grading to the maximum extent consistent with trail safety. The applicant also has provided a wetland delineation study covering the project area, as well as a wetland mitigation plan. Alternative sites are limited due to the intended location of the trail adjacent to Fanno Creek and the location of the existing trail system. Segment 2, Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue, has unavoidable wetlands within the project area. Beginning at Tigard Street, the trail is routed outside the wetland boundary and crosses the unavoidable portion of the wetland near its narrowest section. The trail then skirts the edge of the wetland and the edge of the playing field and associated equipment (fitness course signs, workout equipment stations, and ballfield backstop) and impacts only a narrow fringe of mowed and disturbed wetland. All Oregon Ash trees on the north side of Fanno and Summer Creeks are avoided, and only emergent wetland is impacted. The bridge crosses Summer Creek where no adjacent wetlands are present, and then joins with Tiedeman Avenue to connect with Segment 3. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 6 OF 13 Segment 3, Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands in the park, as well as an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) mitigation . area north of the park. Segment 4, Woodard Park to Grant. Avenue: The trail skirts above the wetland boundary ' where possible, impacting a narrow fringe of emergent wetland on the north side of Fanno Creek. The trail runs in an upland area on the south side of Fanno Creek and then crosses a narrow neck of unavoidable emergent wetland, avoiding forested wetland areas. Trail alignment is constrained through this segment due to steep upland slopes on the north side of Fanno Creek; the trail has to cross a backwater emergent area on the south side of Fanno Creek to connect with the paved ramp up to Grant Avenue. Impacts to the backwater wetland area are avoided by constructing a boardwalk bridge across the wetland area, with piers in the upland (top-of-bank to top-of-bank). • Segment 5, Grant Avenue to Main Street avoids wetlands. The trail alignment has been routed outside of the wetland area; it connects with an existing concrete walk located north of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Main Street. Segment 6b, Main Street South: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands, and a large section of the proposed trail on the east side of Fanno Creek was abandoned due to the extensive amount of wetlands present. A part of the trail in this section is a boardwalk, to raise the trail up and avoid excessive fill (in uplands) near the top-of-bank of Fanno Creek. In this segment, the location of the bridge crossing Fanno Creek was constrained by the City's easements on the adjoining properties (and by construction of a new building south of Main Street on the east side of Fanno Creek). The trail continues in upland on the west side of Fanno Creek to connect with the existing paved pathway. A southern portion of this trail segment connects to the Ash Street right-of-way, avoiding wetlands on both sides of the trail. The wetlands along the trail alignment have been delineated and described in two wetland delineation reports prepared by Fishman Environmental Services (FES) in the spring of 1998. The two impact areas are described below: The northernmost impact area is in Segment 2, on the Fowler School site owned by the Tigard-Tualatin School District. The trail skirts a broad flood plain of Fanno Creek dominated by reed canarygrass and meadow foxtail, and crosses a narrow neck of the wetland that. extends away_ from the floodplain area (this wetland neck extends upslope to the west, off-site to a wetland seep area). The trail then impacts a narrow grassy fringe of emergent wetland east of the school ball field and west of an Oregon Ash wetland forest that is immediately adjacent to Fanno Creek. Part of this wetland area is regularly mowed as lawn associated with the ball field. Soils in the floodplain area were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silty clay loam, with no redox concentrations to 6 inches, over a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) stiff clay, with brown (10YR 5/3) redox concentrations to a depth of 16 inches. Soils in an upslope position near the crossing of the wetland neck were a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) silty clay loam to 16 inches, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations, and gray (10YR 5/1) depletions at 14 inches. The floodplain receives high-water over-bank flows from Fanno Creek and has a high groundwater table. . CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 7 OF 13 • • • The other segment with wetland impacts is Segment 4, north of Grant Avenue. The trails passes through an emergent meadow associated with the floodplain of Fanno Creek. Bentgrass and Reed dominate the meadow area Canarygrass, and has soils that were a very dark grayish brown and dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2 and 4/2) sandy silt loam, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations and dark gray (5Y 4/1) depletions in the surface 10 inches. The soils had a compacted hardpan at 10 inches, possibly disturbed from previous sewer line construction. The second wetland crossing in this segment occurs on the opposite (south) side of Fanno Creek, where the trail crosses a narrow finger of sparsely-vegetated, disturbed wetland dominated by Climbing Nightshade and Red-Osier Dogwood, with Himalayan Blackberry on the slopes. The trail avoids the surrounding Oregon Ash and Red Alder trees near the trail. Water quality in this backwater area appears to have been negatively impacted by trash and debris. Section 18.797.140 requires the following criteria to be addressed to allow the proposed fill and mitigation of wetlands designated on the City's Significant Water Resources map: The analysis shall consider the Environmental, Social, Economic and Energy (ESEE) consequences of allowing the proposed conflicting use fully, consider both the impacts on the specific resource site in comparison with other comparable sites within the Tigard Planning Area; The ESEE analysis must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Tigard City Council that the adverse economic consequences of not allowing the conflicting use are sufficient to justify the loss, or partial loss of the resource; In particular, ESEE analysis must demonstrate why the use cannot be located on buildable land, consistent with the provisions of this chapter, and that there are no other sites within the Tigard Planning area that can meet the specific needs of the proposed use; The Comprehensive Plan calls for a trail through the Fanno Greenway, which is defined as the area co-terminus with the 100-year floodplain. Because of existing development along and within the floodplain and also because two-thirds of the floodplain area is wetlands, very limited locations are available at this time for the retrofitting of the trail within the corridor. A trail located on buildable land outside of the corridor would not be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and, because of creekside development, would have to be designed as an on-street trail. Such a trail would serve a transportation function but would not serve the purposes of a recreational trail as conceptually identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's ESEE analysis demonstrates that the benefits of allowing the trail far outweigh the limited negative consequences associated with its environmental impact. The ESEE analysis shall be prepared by a team consisting of a wildlife biologist or wetlands ecologist and a land use planner or land use attorney, all of whom are qualified in their respective fields and experienced in the preparation of Goal 5 ESEE analysis; CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 8 OF 13 • In addition to City of Tigard Planning and Engineering.Staff, the qualified professionals who contributed to the ESEE analysis include David Evans and Associates, Fishman Environmental Services, and Percival Associates. David Evans and Associates conducted a topographic and tree survey of the project area. Fishman Environmental Services completed , a wetland delineation and mitigation plan, plus an existing conditions assessment of the project area based on the Water Quality Resource Area Requirements table included in the Metro Model Ordinance. Percival Associates provided planting plans for the two upland areas adjacent to the creek. If the application is approved, then the ESEE analysis shall be incorporated by reference into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and the Tigard Wetland and Stream Corridor Map shall be amended to remove the site from the inventory. PROPOSED FINDING: Based on the analysis above and the applicant's ESEE analysis incorporated herein by reference, the Planning Commission recommends City Council adopt a finding that the adverse economic, social and energy consequences of not allowing portions of the Fanno Creek trail are sufficient to justify partial loss of the wetland resource. TITLE 3: WATER QUALITY, FLOOD MANAGEMENT AND FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION, MODEL ORDINANCE CONDITIONAL USE REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.F 1n 1998, Metro Council adopted performance standards for the protection of streams, wetlands, and floodplains, called Title 3 of the Functional Plan. Tigard and the other jurisdictions within Metro are required to amend their Comprehensive Plans and develop codes to address these new standards by January 1, 2000. In addition to Title 3, Metro has adopted a model ordinance that provides approved examples of provisions that can be used by jurisdictions to comply with Title 3 performance standards. Although the City has not as yet adopted Title 3 compliance measures, the Metro attorney has determined that local Comprehensive Plan amendments related to water quality and flood management must comply with Title 3 as it stands during the period before adoption and acceptance of such measures. Since only the model ordinance, and not Title 3, contains standards for pathways, these are followed in this application in order to address the present proposal's . consistency with Title 3. The applicable portion of the Model Ordinance is Section 1.5 "Walkways and bike paths". This section states as follows: b. A paved walkway or bike path shall not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the Protected Water Feature. For any paved walkway or bike path, the width of the Water Quality Resource Area must be increased by a distance equal to the width of the path. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation. Where practicable, a maximum of 10 percent of the trail may be within 30 feet of the Protected Water Feature; and c. A walkway or bike path shall not exceed 10 feet in width. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 9 OF 13 • • • The trail alignment was developed based in part on the avoidance of significance natural resources and maintenance of the 10% standard specified in the model ordinance. However, due to development along the creek and the extent of wetlands within the floodplain, aligning the trail to meet the 10% standard proved impracticable. According to the applicant's submittal, as presently designed, 29% of the trail including paved and boardwalk ' portions, is within 30 feet of water resource boundaries. The reasons for this amount of encroachment and the consideration given to alternative alignments that could reduce this impact are detailed in the ESEE analysis section of this report. To recapitulate briefly, Segment 2 is constrained by the sports field location. Segment 4 is constrained by the need to cross the creek bend and the configuration of the wetland within the greenway area. Segment 5, Grant Street to Main Street, is constrained by existing buildings (the Woodard Apartments) and the existing berm, which is located very near an oxbow of Fanno Creek, and also by the need to connect to the existing trail, which is close to the creek. Segment 6B, Main Street South, is constrained by an existing building on the Dolan property. In each case, no alternative alignments are present. Although the alignment exceeds the 10% standard, the trail poses very limited disturbance to the existing vegetation and has avoided all forested and most scrub-shrub areas, with the exception of the two Oregon Ash trees that need to be removed for the bridge over Fanno Creek in Segment 4. In order to compensate for the removal of riparian vegetation, however limited, and to enhance the vegetation along the creek, the applicant has provided a specific planting plan for two highly disturbed sites of 0.83 and 0.78 acres. The proposed planting plans satisfy the. Title 3 baseline standard of 80% groundcover and 50% tree canopy using non-nuisance planting from the Native Plant List. This proposed upland re-vegetation work is in addition to the mitigation required by wetland fill permit conditions. As a result of these two projects, the net effect of the trail project will be to improve the overall biological conditions of the riparian area along Fanno Creek. In addition to City of Tigard Engineering Staff, the qualified professionals who contributed to this project included David Evans and Associates, Fishman Environmental Services, and Percival Associates. ' David Evans and Associates conducted a topographic and tree survey of the project area. Fishman Environmental Services completed a wetland delineation and mitigation plan, plus an existing conditions assessment of the project area. Percival Associates provided planting plans for the two upland areas adjacent to the creek (attached). Topographic, tree survey, wetland, and debris and noxious materials information is depicted in the base maps accompanying this report. The implementation schedule, including timeline for construction, mitigation, mitigation maintenance, monitoring, reporting and contingency plans are included in the reports. These timelines are subject to right-of-way negotiations and the timing of the necessary permits and approvals. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 10 OF 13 • • • PROPOSED FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Planning Commission recommends City Council find that the applicant's plan satisfies the standards of the Metro Title 3 model ordinance relating to Walkways and Bike Paths. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department and Water Department have had an opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. The Operations Utility Department has had an opportunity to review the proposal and has offered the following comments. Because the proposed trail will parallel an existing sewer trunk line, the trail could provide access for sewer line maintenance and emergency repairs.' It also could provide improved , access for much needed stream bank stabilization projects. As such, the trail surface should be constructed to support the weight of utility vehicles SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and The Unified Sewerage Agency have had an opportunity to review this proposal and offered no comments or objections. The Oregon Division of State Lands has had an opportunity to review the proposal an offered no comments or objections. The Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development has had an opportunity to review the proposal an offered no comments or objections. The US Army Corps of Engineers has had an opportunity to review the proposal and offered no comments objections. Metro was given an opportunity to comment on the proposal and provided the following comments: Once again, thanks for taking us on the field trip. We all enjoyed being able to see the alignment first hand and to see that two critical needs, providing trail opportunities and protecting natural resources, are being met. Metro is totally supportive of Tigard's efforts to design and build the portion of the Fanno Creek trail that lies in the City. It is a key segment of the entire trail system from the Willamette Park at John's Landing to the Tualatin River. Overall, the City is proposing a reasonable plan to comply with the Title 3 requirements. As discussed on Friday, below are our comments: When the trail abuts a wetland or is in the vegetated corridor of a stream, where possible or practicable, reduce the area of impact through means such as: CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL • PAGE 11 OF 13 • • . • Narrowing shoulders (from 2ft to 1ft) with native vegetation and/or grasses • No mowing of the shoulder adjacent to the wetland • Narrowing impervious trail surfaces (from 10ft to 8ft) • Pervious trail surfaces where possible (Gresham is using compacted gravel - call Phil Kidby, Gresham Parks at 612-2530 and Metro is planning to use compacted gravel on the • Springwater Corridor Trail - call Dawn Uchiyama, Portland Parks at 823-5596 for more information) • Boardwalks as an alternative along wetlands and at pinch points There are numerous opportunities for restoration of the riparian corridor including removal of non-native, invasive plants and replacing them with native plants. A 3-year plan for . monitoring the success of the restoration projects is recommended. Title 3 requires that any fill added to the floodplain be matched with an equal amount of fill removal to maintain the capacity of the floodplain. Staff Responses: Regarding the necking down of the trail and shoulder, our understanding was that this comment applied to two areas: the wetland area along the edge of the sports field and the portion of the trail alignment located on top of flood control berm. We understood that Metro had no objection to a ten-foot wide trail in the upland areas. In order to avoid user conflicts, we would prefer to build to the state and regional ten-foot standard. City staff is agreeable no mowing of the shoulder adjacent to the sports field wetland. Since the trail route and shoulder is within the existing lawn area, we will need to coordinate with the school district regarding a change to their current practice of mowing the entire sloped area. Pervious surface where possible is a suggestion we have investigated. Other than experimental surfaces and expensive inter-locking pavers, crushed rock appears to be the only feasible alternative surface available. City staff do not view this as an appropriate surface for the Fanno Creek Trail. This is because the trail is intended to be multi- modal, serving pedestrian, bicyclist, wheel chair users, and skaters. Compacted gravel is not suitable for narrow wheeled bikes and roller and in-line skates and is problematic from a maintenance point of view. Therefore, we would prefer to go with an asphalt surface. We plan to use boardwalks at the two locations we pointed out in the field. The plan has been revised to include compensatory excavation, as required under Title 3. The excavation will include removal of the overgrown hard surface basketball court and the grubbing out of the blackberries in the area between the flood control berm and creek bank on the Johnson Street Apt. property. The cleared area will be restored with natural vegetation as described in the project proposal. Engineering is doing the quantity calculations at this time. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 • CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 12 OF 13 A ' • To go back, when we visited the apartment property, we incorrectly y identified the trail as running on top of the portion of the berm near the bend in the creek. Instead, the trail is proposed to run over and along the apartment side of the berm and within in the lawn area. It then runs up and back over the berm. For handicapped and ramp safety reasons, we would prefer to not narrow down this section of the trail to eight feet. Our engineers believe this width is too narrow relative to the gradient of the frail and would pose a potential safety hazard to frail users Robert Bothman of the Fanno Creek Trail Working Group has reviewed the proposal - and provided the following comments: I have reviewed the amendment and the plans for segments 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6B.. I have visited the segments and support the amendment and plans for these sections. SECTION VII. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS Dewey and Margaret Hamilton have reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: We are retired and walking and riding bicycles along these trails is important to us in maintaining a healthy life style. Being able to walk and ride on a trail with a natural setting rather than a roadway is an important safety feature for us. Ken Tolliver has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: I want you to know that at least one family is 100% behind the needed amendments that your • are considering. Access to the trail will increase the exposure of local residents to the natural areas along the creek and help them to be more connected with it. Please approve the amendment requests. Mike Meredith has reviewed the proposal and provided comments in support of approving the applicant's proposal. . June 9, 1999 . PREPARED BY: Mark J. Roberts DATE Associate Planner June 9, 1999 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager iAlrpin\dua ne\fa n nocreektra il.doc CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 13 OF 13 a _ r�. ., --_ ice■ �_ ...i�� "IN f ;:ism1♦A riummou 11- , �,,i , ir.o■<_ . wa ■ CITY of TIGARD ■ 0[06RA►M10 1Mf011MATION tYeTtY`'����� i\likt:,%\ vvilil` �, at ,'� � E■■ialli E •,e Wit► p.p �, !■1 �■ ■�s�_ �• � VICINITY MAP .fir. �� .ay .• ., i 61:1 um. 2 �;r - �, ,; ;�! ��• �r ii CPA 1.999-0000�f a •` , ttttttttttt��. �,I�L� �I .� 11tttttttt� �� \\\\ Ie rmuip�■�.`. 1: :� ��! CITY OF TIGARD Ii.■‘. - ' wir 4 0 FANNO CREEK �a� •4# P;i41 ik∎ ∎ TR AIL ALIGNMENT N\ „• �E! _�� ��► 'I ��.�`�� I ► �� i 16 SubJect properties��� :►' '!■ � \'\� •, ♦♦, are included int the- ■��y % ������ .• �� ' trail alignment project . :111111111 I� •:.,,� e !.:' .��*�/�♦ •��►�.` h ��> ♦ Streams 11111 1m.111 %■• 414.'♦ ` N. ,t,; A `• , . 'I / MAJOR S44 • 11011.411411111P,A4St , .40 , *' . # \\\‘‘N 1 ,W'' #■■■R'1,,, � 444 ■4,11#4 ' ``N,,".7 , MINOR■ irialWAIIIIIPP$0,° * %At#/#, 4•A• ‘\\\%\• ,,t ppoti �,�`�� �, ��, . . , `�°°��` Tigard Wetland Inv.•17.44-60.9,-. • j : Ivi .� me ♦�.,. ..•,•�.♦!, .,. • e 1� ■■►•I : am ` �� T M :. O . 44 . S' % ` 0 400 800 1200 Feet ild���■ :INN: � , �� �� 1....kilt, ..�� ` ,.858 feet ..,,�. . :11111 ;int.� I��� ��,• ,�►000.•*" A At ill 40 tie a am I A orm 1111■■■;■■■■ ■ �� •;, ♦ ♦�— /.1/b�,tE ■Ii V„■ City of Tigard . ■„�,,,.=■■■is ■�� pow,,.,. �� �. n�IIII•iIIIIIli.l .1■ ■ Informsfon on this map la for general loulton only and . `�� t48*II . •.t. ,61, ` . '111111 "uld De wdfied w(lA tAe Dawlopment 3eMUa Dlvtdon' ■`fie . 11.11■'' �.. 0-$A# IIIIflIfluiimrniuu.UEUuIi AmMI� ,J125 SW Han 23. ` , """,-. -, Tlgard,OR 9T22d� I,, 1�11,�1�'��1�1���� '� / ''•• • . (503)6JWt,T,a,..a.. ■■■..4.' ` • AttpIAAwN.el.tigafd.or.ui '.n^ 1��� m■■� Community Cavolnnmant Plnf��fo• ens..,� +onn•r,4....--:-IA•A n Jf 7, • • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) City of Tigard ) I, G ree r A . Clasto n , hereby certify: Please Print . That I am a n e m? (o e c for the City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served notice of the Tigard City Council 0 o+i ce. o-1 Fi na I Order 6P j -coO01 , SLR lgg9- OODO3 r Fenno .reels. Tr l Ali'nmc,nl . of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhibit A) upon each of the following named persons on the 24 day of ` ii-n o , 19 cicJ , by mailing to each of them at the address shown on the attached list (Marked Exhibit B), said notice is hereto attached, and deposited in the United States Mail on the 24 day of Ju_n& , 19 q q , postage prepaid. : Al" IF .. Prepared Notice t Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of . 19 q9 . .2. OFFICIAL SEAL k:•:� CATHERINE o wlAnEY ti. =/ NOTARY ausuroREOON 4)76-Q/LA>LQ. , (,2) " COMMISSION NO.922999 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 10,2009 Notary Public of Oregon , I: - - My Commission Expires: -/ ) O1 .03 i. h:\login\cathy\afofmail if • 120 DAYS=N/A CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL • Case Number(s): COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT[CPA]1999-00001 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW LSLRI 1999-00003 Case Name(s): FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT Name of Owner(s): Various Owners (List available upon request) Name of Applicant: City of Tigard - Attn: Duane Roberts, Project Manager Address of Applicant: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Location: 1S134 AND 2S102: Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over Summer Creek): Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park: Segment 3: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a bridge over Fanno Creek): Segment 4: Grant Avenue to Main Street along Fanno Creek: and Segment 5: Main Street South (has a bridge over Fanno Creek) Request: > THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS APPLICATION ON 6/7/99 AND VOTED UNANIMOUSLY TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL. ON 6/22/99 THE CITY COUNCIL HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE APPLICATION TO RECEIVE PUBLIC TESTIMONY AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION. THE COUNCIL VOTED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE REQUEST AS FOLLOWS: Approval to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources overlay from 0.30 acres of wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, to allow construction of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Trail. Sensitive Lands Review was also approved for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. Action: > ❑ Approval as Requested © Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of Record within-the Required Distance © Affected Governmental Agencies © The Affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The Applicant and Owner(s) Final Decision: THE DECISION WAS SIGNED ON JUNE 22, 1999, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON JUNE 22, 1999. :.:.1 The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. Appeal: A review of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) according to their procedures. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or the City Recorder at (503) 639-4171. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE CITY COUNCII (COVER SHEET) • • CITY OF TIGARD,OREGON _ - ORDINANCE NO. 99- !7 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA 99-00001), SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR 99-00003), AND TITLE 3 CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW, REQUESTED TO CONSTRUCT FANNO CREEK TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the applicant has requested approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the City's Water Resources Overlay, Sensitive Lands Review, and Title 3 Conditional Use Review to construct sections of the Fanno Creek Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail; and WHEREAS, on June 7, 1999, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the aforementioned land use applications, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval included in the attached Exhibit"A"; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 1999, the City Council held a public hearing and approved the aforementioned land use applications, subject to the findings and Conditions of Approval included in the attached Exhibit"A." NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The proposal is consistent with all of the relevant criteria as noted in the attached Planning Commission recommendation to the Tigard City Council, also referred to as "Exhibit A." SECTION 2: The City Council approves the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Sensitive Lands Review, and Title 3 Conditional Use Review, subject to the Findings and Conditions of Approval as set forth in the attached"Exhibit A." SECTION 3: Because the prompt implementation of this ordinance is necessary to complete the construction of the Fanno Creek trail improvements during the current building season, an emergency is declared to exist, and this ordinance is effective upon its passage by the Council. ORDINANCE NO. 99-1—] Page 1 of 2 • • PASSED: By UrlailA YaS vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only,this iiday of/ AA,∎.e_ , 1999. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard.City Council this?' day of '99. of es Nicoli, ayor • Ap roved as to form: Attorney .4a aq Date i:\citywide\ord\Fannotrail.ord.dot ORDINANCE No. 99-) Page 2 of 2 • EXHIBIT A • dq 2'„` ��,�,:5: yi;�,�,.i•" .qr; -; ,.c- 3p F-- k STAFF`REPORT y ss3 F � Y o: TO NTH KING COMMISSION . y��.• wri_ .,;r` ar.;.;�;.'> .�'�;. >: " . �y :7": FOR THE CITY OF:,T,ICAC®;OREGON 4 ' € ° L*fy' � .,C. r, °t,°'i .r` ,}s," ,?f rt s"t a ' '. `=.'h.'•.'s - _ vt yr �+,:,' '. --_, - ¢ ,' rDe e lop v IK/Y IA. ;& a. 120 DAYS = N/A SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment CPA 1999-00001 Sensitive Lands Review SLR 1999-00003 PROPOSAL: The City, as applicant, requests consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to remove the Water Resources Overlay from small portions of three wetlands to allow construction of segments of the multi- modal Fanno Creek Greenway trail between SW Tigard Street and the SW Ash Avenue Extension. The combined area included within the wetland fills in question is approximately 0.30 acres. As part of this same application, the City requests Sensitive Lands approval for trail improvements within the 100-year floodplain and Title 3: Water.Quality, Flood Management, and Fish and Wildlife Conservation approval for a conditional use within the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone. APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: City of Tigard Attn: Duane Roberts, Project Planner 13125 SW Hall Boulevard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential, Industrial, Central Business District. ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4.5, IP and CBD. LOCATION: Fanno Creek Greenway between Tigard Street and Ash Avenue Extension. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3 Model Ordinance. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff proposes that the':Planning Commission:recommend APP..ROVAL to:the_:City Council CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 1 OF 13 • • for the above request subject to certain Conditions of Approval. The proposed findings and conclusions on'which the recommendation is:based are noted in Section IV.: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE`FOLLOWING.,CONDITIONS SHALL BE.SATISFIED: 1. Submit a copy of the permit approval from the Division of State Lands and US Army Corps of Engineers. 2. Install erosion control measures prior to construction. Erosion control measures may not be removed until construction has been completed. 3. Any fill placed within the floodplain shall be offset by an equal amount of excavation elsewhere within the floodplain portion of the project area. • 4. Upon completion of construction, the Water Quality Resource Area shall be restored and maintained in accordance with the mitigation plan and specifications contained in Table 2 of the Title 3 Model Ordinance. 5. To the extent practicable, during construction existing vegetation shall be protected and left in place. Work area shall be carefully located and marked to reduce potential damage to the Title 3 Water Quality Resource Area. Trees in the Water Quality Resource Area shall not be used as anchors for stabilizing construction equipment. 6. Where existing vegetation is removed during construction, or the original land contours disturbed, the site shall be revegetated, and the vegetation shall be established as soon as practicable. Nuisance plants, as identified in the Metro Native Plant List, may be removed at any time. Interim erosion control measures such as mulching shall be used to avoid erosion on bare areas. Nuisance plants shall be replaced with non-nuisance plants by the next growing season. 7. Prior to construction, the Water Quality Resource Area shall be flagged, fenced or otherwise marked and shall remain undisturbed, except as may be required to complete the proposed trail improvements. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1983. The Comprehensive Plan includes a bicycle/pedestrian trail element that calls for a bikeway along Fanno Creek. The Comprehensive Plan and 1987 Tigard Park Plan identify the Fanno Creek bikepath as a continuous, off-street path that follows the route of Fanno Creek as it flows between the northern and southern city limits. Between the 1980's and mid-1990's, new development in the area of the Fanno Creek Greenway was conditioned to provide the bikepath as conceptually identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Within the boundaries of the present project, bikepaths have been constructed along the streamside edge of the Morlan Plumbing property and under the Pacific Highway bridge connecting to Main Street. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 2 OF 13 • In order to add more specificity to the Comprehensive Plan designation, in 1997 the City conducted a technical study, with extensive public participation, to map the alignment of the trail from Tiedeman to Durham Road. In designating the most appropriate route, the study considered wetlands, soils, vegetation, wildlife, and topography within thie greenway corridor as well as various social factors, such as neighborhood and employment locations. Vicinity Information and Proposal Description: The land uses along the two sides of the trail corridor consist of a school sports field, industrial development, commercial development, and older single-family residential development on 7,500 .square foot lots. The boundary of the Greenway Corridor is coterminous with the floodplain. Over the years, significant encroachment and fill has occurred within the greenway Corridor, which is located within an older part of the City. With the exception of parts of three segments, the proposed trail segments consist of a 10-foot-wide paved pathway with two feet of shoulder on either side. This width is consistent with regional and state standards for the Fanno Creek Trail and is designed to provide for the safe passage of two bicycles approaching in opposite directions. The five segments are, from north to south: Segment 2: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (Fowler School Site) Wetland Impact Area: 11,250 square feet (SF) (750 linear feet); 52 cubic yards (CY) excavation; 427 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Summer Creek Segment 3: Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park (Woodard Park Site) Segment 4: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue Wetland Impact Area: 1,995 SF (133 linear feet); 0.17 CY excavation; 117 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Segment 5: Grant Avenue to Main Street Segment 6b: Main Street South Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek • Total Wetland Impact Area: 13,245 SF (0.30 acre) or 833 linear feet of trail; 52.17 CY 'removal and 544 CY fill Three bridges are part of the project, and will span Fanno Creek (twice) and Summer Creek from top-of-bank to top-of-bank. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND PROPOSED FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: CHAPTER 18.775, SENSITIVE LANDS Section 18.775.020.0 states that landform alterations or developments which are only within wetland areas that meet the jurisdictional requirements and permit criteria of CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 3 OF 13 • • the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Division of State Lands, Unified Sewerage Agency, and/or other federal, state, or regional agencies do not require a sensitive lands . permit. The City, shall require that all necessary permits from other agencies are obtained. All other applicable City requirements must be satisfied, including sensitive land permits for areas within the 100-year floodplain, slopes of 25% or greater or unstable ground, drainageways, and wetlands that are not under state or federal jurisdiction. The proposal will impact wetlands that are under state and federal jurisdiction and, therefore, do not require sensitive lands review. Permit requirements of state agencies are addressed elsewhere within this report. The Water Resources overlay is applicable to the wetlands impacted by this project and is addressed elsewhere in this report. Floodplain impacts are addressed below. Section 18.775.020.E.2 states that sensitive lands permits shall be required in the 100- year floodplain when any of the following circumstances apply: • Ground disturbance(s) or landform alterations in all floodway areas; • Ground disturbance(s) or landform alterations in floodway fringe locations involving more than 50 cubic yards of material; • Repair, reconstruction, or improvement of an existing structure or utility, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure prior to the improvement or the damage requiring reconstruction provided no development occurs in the floodway; • Structures intended for human habitation; and • Accessory structures which are greater than 528 square feet in size, outside of floodway areas. The proposal includes ground disturbance involving more than 50 cubic yards of material in the floodway fringe. Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) 183.120 defines "floodway fringe" as the area of the floodplain outside the floodway area. Therefore, sensitive lands review is required for this project. • Section 18.775.070.B provides . that an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: • Land form alterations shall preserve or enhance the floodplain storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway shall not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge; The project engineer has determined that the proposed project will preserve the floodplain storage capacity of the portion of Fanno Creek within the project area, that the zero-foot rise floodway will not be disturbed, and that the project will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 4 OF 13 • • • • Land form alterations or developments within the 100-year floodplain shall be allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the Comprehensive Plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community recreation uses, utilities, or public support facilities as defined in Chapter 18.120 of the Community Development Code shall be allowed in areas designated residential subject to applicable zoning standards; The land within the project area is zoned .R-4.5, IP, and CBD. Landform alternation is permitted in areas designated as commercial or industrial. The proposed use is community recreation and, as such, is an exception to the prohibition on landform alteration within _ residentially designated zones. • Where a land form alteration or development is permitted to occur within the floodplain it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100- year flood The applicant has proposed to offset the proposed floodplain fill with an equal amount of excavation within the 100-year floodplain, so that the proposed alteration will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year floodplain. • The land form alteration or development plan includes a pedestrian/bicycle pathway in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan, unless the construction of said pathway is deemed by the Hearings Officer as untimely; The proposed alteration is a pedestrian/bicycle pathway project that carries out the City pathway plan and the policies and objectives of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. • The plans for the pedestrian/bicycle pathway indicate that no pathway will be below the elevation of an average annual flood; The applicant proposes to locate the pathway above the elevation of an average annual flood. • The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands approvals shall be obtained; and The approval of the Division of State Lands has been obtained. A copy of the project permit has been provided to the City. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approval is pending. • Where landform alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. The proposal under consideration carries out the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 5 OF 13 • • PROPOSED FINDING: Based on the analysis above, Planning Commission recommends City Council find that the proposal satisfies the approval criteria for landfomi alterations within the 100-year floodplain. WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (18.797.080) This Chapter has standards for sites identified as significant on the Tigard Wetlands and Stream Corridors Map. The standards identify Fanno Creek as a Major Stream, which requires a 50-foot setback from top-of-bank or the upland edge of associated wetlands. Table 18.797.2 identifies water related recreation facilities and trails as a "Type I allowed use with mitigation" within the riparian setback area. However, any landform alteration within wetlands in the Water Resource overlay is prohibited. Section 18.797.140 states that in order to develop within wetlands, a Comprehensive Plan amendment is required. This section addresses the applicable criteria for construction of the trail, in the riparian setback area and for the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Section 18.797.060.A states that, for Type I uses, the applicant shall prepare a plan that demonstrates that the use will be constructed and located so as to minimize grading, native vegetation removal, and the area necessary for the use. The Director may require additional information where necessary to determine WR district boundaries or to mitigate identified impacts from a proposed development, including but not limited to: • Site survey as prescribed in Section 18.797.060B; The applicant has submitted a site survey completed by certified land surveyors. • One or more of the reports described in Section 18.797.060D. The applicant has submitted a topographic survey as conducted by David Evans and Associates along with a technical study prepared by Fishman and Associates addressing the vegetation removal and grading associated with the proposed and alternative trail alignments. The proposed alignment minimizes natural vegetation removal and grading to the maximum extent consistent with trail safety. The applicant also has provided a wetland delineation study covering the project area, as well as a wetland mitigation plan. Alternative sites are limited due to the intended location of the trail adjacent to Fanno Creek and the location of the existing trail system. Segment 2, Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue, has unavoidable wetlands within the project area. Beginning at Tigard Street, the trail is routed outside the wetland boundary and crosses the unavoidable portion of the wetland near its narrowest section. The trail then skirts the edge of the wetland and the edge of the playing field and associated equipment (fitness course signs, workout equipment stations, and ballfield backstop) and impacts only a narrow fringe of mowed and disturbed wetland. All Oregon Ash trees on the north side of Fanno and Summer Creeks are avoided, and only emergent wetland is impacted. The bridge crosses Summer Creek where no adjacent wetlands are present, and then joins with Tiedeman Avenue to connect with Segment 3. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 6 OF 13 • • • • Segment 3, Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands in the park, as well as an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) mitigation area north of the park. Segment 4, Woodard Park to Grant Avenue: The trail skirts above the wetland boundary where possible, impacting a narrow fringe of emergent wetland on the north side of Fanno Creek. The trail runs in an upland area on the south side of Fanno Creek and then crosses a narrow neck of unavoidable emergent wetland, avoiding forested wetland areas. Trail alignment is constrained through this segment due to steep upland slopes.on the north side of Fanno Creek; the trail has to cross a backwater emergent area on the south side of Fanno Creek to connect with the paved ramp up to Grant Avenue. Impacts to the backwater wetland area are avoided by constructing a boardwalk bridge across the wetland area, with piers in the upland (top-of-bank to top-of-bank). Segment 5, Grant Avenue to Main Street avoids wetlands. The trail alignment has been routed outside of the wetland area; it connects with an existing concrete walk located north of SW Pacific Highway (99W) and north of SW Main Street. Segment 6b, Main Street South: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands, and a large section of the proposed trail on the east side of Fanno Creek was abandoned due to the extensive amount of wetlands present. A part of the trail in this section is a boardwalk, to raise the trail up and avoid excessive fill (in uplands) near the top-of-bank of Fanno Creek. In this segment, the location of the bridge crossing Fanno Creek was constrained by the City's easements on the adjoining properties (and by construction of a new building south of Main Street on the east side of Fanno Creek). The trail continues in upland on the west side of Fanno Creek to connect with the existing paved pathway. A southern portion of this trail segment connects to the Ash Street right-of-way, avoiding wetlands on both sides of the trail. The wetlands along the trail alignment have been delineated and described in two wetland delineation reports prepared by Fishman Environmental Services (FES) in the spring of 1998. The two impact areas are described below: The northernmost impact area is in Segment 2, on the Fowler School site owned by the Tigard-Tualatin School District. The trail skirts a broad flood plain of Fanno Creek dominated by reed canarygrass and meadow foxtail, and crosses a narrow neck of the wetland that extends away from the floodplain area (this wetland neck extends upslope to the west, off-site to a wetland seep area). The trail then impacts a narrow grassy fringe of emergent wetland east of the school ball field and west of an Oregon Ash wetland forest that is immediately adjacent to Fanno Creek. Part of this wetland area is regularly mowed as lawn associated with the ball field. Soils in the floodplain area were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silty clay loam, with no redox concentrations to 6 inches, over a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) stiff clay, with brown (10YR 5/3) redox concentrations to a depth of 16 inches. Soils in an upslope position near the crossing of the wetland neck were a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) silty clay loam to 16 inches, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations, and gray (10YR 5/1) depletions at 14 inches. The floodplain receives high-water over-bank flows from Fanno Creek and has a high groundwater table. . CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 7 OF 13 • • The other segment with wetland impacts is Segment 4, north of Grant Avenue. The trails passes through an emergent meadow associated with the floodplain of Fanno Creek. . Bentgrass and Reed dominate the meadow area Canarygrass, and has soils that were a very dark grayish brown and dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2 and 4/2) sandy silt loam, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations and dark gray (5Y 4/1) depletions in the surface 10 inches. The soils had a compacted hardpan at 10 inches, possibly disturbed from previous sewer line construction. The second wetland crossing in this segment occurs on the opposite (south) side of Fanno Creek, where the trail crosses a narrow finger of sparsely-vegetated, disturbed wetland dominated by Climbing Nightshade and Red-Osier Dogwood, with Himalayan Blackberry on the slopes. The trail avoids the surrounding Oregon Ash and Red Alder trees near the trail. Water quality in this backwater area appears to have been negatively impacted by trash and debris. Section 18.797.140 requires the following criteria to be addressed to allow the proposed fill and mitigation of wetlands designated on the City's Significant Water Resources map: The analysis shall consider the Environmental, Social, Economic and Energy (ESEE) • consequences of allowing the proposed conflicting use fully, consider both the impacts on the specific resource site in comparison with other comparable sites within the Tigard Planning Area; The ESEE analysis must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Tigard City Council that the adverse economic consequences of not allowing the conflicting use are sufficient to justify the loss, or partial loss of the resource; In particular, ESEE analysis must demonstrate why the use cannot be located on buildable land, consistent with the provisions of this chapter, and that there are no other sites within the Tigard Planning area that can meet the specific needs of the proposed use; The Comprehensive Plan calls for a trail through the Fanno Greenway, which is defined as the area co-terminus with the 100-year floodplain. Because of existing development along and within the floodplain and also because two-thirds of the floodplain area is wetlands, very limited locations are available at this time for the retrofitting of the trail within the corridor. A trail located on buildable land outside of the corridor would not be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and, because of creekside development, would have to be designed as an on-street trail. Such a trail would serve a transportation function but would not serve the purposes of a recreational trail as conceptually identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's ESEE analysis demonstrates that the benefits of allowing the trail far outweigh the limited negative consequences associated with its environmental impact. The ESEE analysis shall be prepared by a team consisting of a wildlife biologist or wetlands ecologist and a land use planner or land use attorney, all of whom are qualified in their respective fields and experienced in the preparation of Goal 5 ESEE analysis; • CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 8 OF 13 • • • • . In addition to City of Tigard Planning and Engineering Staff, the qualified professionals who contributed to the ESEE analysis include David, Evans and Associates, Fishman Environmental Services, and Percival Associates. David Evans and Associates conducted a topographic and tree survey of the project area. Fishman Environmental Services completed a wetland delineation and mitigation plan, plus an existing conditions assessment of the project area based on the Water Quality Resource Area Requirements table included in the Metro Model Ordinance. Percival Associates provided planting plans for the two upland areas adjacent to the creek. If the application is approved, then the ESEE analysis shall be incorporated by reference into the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and the Tigard Wetland and Stream Corridor Map shall be amended to remove the site from the inventory. PROPOSED FINDING: Based on the analysis above and the applicant's ESEE analysis • incorporated "herein by reference, the Planning Commission recommends City Council adopt a finding that the adverse economic, social and energy consequences of not allowing portions of the Fann'o Creek trail are sufficient to justify partial loss of the wetland resource. TITLE 3: WATER QUALITY, FLOOD MANAGEMENT AND FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION, MODEL ORDINANCE CONDITIONAL USE REQUIREMENTS, SECTION 4.F 1n 1998, Metro Council adopted performance standards for the protection of streams, wetlands, and floodplains, called Title 3 of the Functional Plan. Tigard and the other jurisdictions within Metro are required to amend their Comprehensive Plans and develop codes to address these new standards by January 1, 2000. In addition to Title 3, Metro has adopted a model ordinance that provides approved examples of provisions that can be used by jurisdictions to comply with Title 3 performance standards. Although the City has not as yet adopted Title 3 compliance measures, the Metro attorney has determined that local Comprehensive Plan amendments related to water quality and flood 'management must comply with Title 3 as it stands during the period before adoption and acceptance of such measures. Since only the model ordinance, and not Title 3, contains standards for pathways, these are followed in this application in order to address the present proposal's consistency with Title 3. The applicable portion of the Model Ordinance is Section 1.5 "Walkways and bike paths". This section states as follows: b. A paved walkway or bike path shall not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the Protected Water Feature. For any paved walkway or bike path, the width of the Water Quality Resource Area must be increased by a distance equal to the width of the path. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation. Where practicable, a maximum of 10 percent of the trail may be within 30 feet of the Protected Water Feature; and c. A walkway or bike path shall not exceed 10 feet in width. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 9 OF 13 • • The trail alignment was developed based in part on the avoidance of significance natural resources and maintenance of the 10% standard specified in the model ordinance. However, due to development along the creek and the extent of wetlands within the floodplain, aligning the trail to meet the 10% standard proved impracticable. According to the applicant's submittal, as presently designed, 29% of the trail including paved and boardwalk portions, is within 30 feet of water resource boundaries. The reasons for this amount of encroachment and the consideration given to alternative alignments that could reduce this impact are detailed in the ESEE analysis section of this report. To recapitulate briefly, Segment 2 is constrained by the sports field location. Segment 4 is constrained by the need to cross the creek bend and the configuration of the • wetland within the greenway area. Segment 5, Grant Street to Main Street, is constrained by existing buildings (the Woodard Apartments) and the existing berm, which is located very near an oxbow of Fanno Creek, and also by the need to connect to the existing trail, which is close to the creek. Segment 6B, Main Street South, is constrained by an existing building on the Dolan property. In each case, no alternative alignments are present. Although the alignment exceeds the 10% standard, the trail poses very limited disturbance to the existing vegetation and has avoided all forested and most scrub-shrub areas, with the exception of the two Oregon Ash trees that need to be removed for the bridge over Fanno Creek in Segment 4. In order to compensate for the removal of riparian vegetation, however limited, and to enhance the vegetation along the creek, the applicant has provided a specific planting plan for two highly disturbed sites of 0.83 and 0.78 acres. The proposed planting plans satisfy the Title 3 baseline standard of 80% groundcover and 50% tree canopy using non-nuisance planting from the Native Plant List. This proposed upland re-vegetation work is in addition to the mitigation required by wetland fill permit conditions. As a result of these two projects, the net effect of the trail project will be to improve the overall biological conditions of the riparian area along Fanno Creek. In addition to City of Tigard Engineering Staff, the qualified professionals who contributed to this project included David Evans. and Associates, Fishman Environmental Services, and Percival Associates. David Evans and Associates conducted a topographic and tree survey of the project area. Fishman Environmental Services completed a wetland delineation and mitigation plan, plus an existing conditions assessment of the project area. Percival Associates provided planting plans for the two upland areas adjacent to the creek (attached). Topographic, tree survey, wetland, and debris and noxious materials information is depicted in the base maps accompanying this report. The implementation schedule, including timeline for construction, mitigation, mitigation maintenance, monitoring, reporting and contingency plans are included in the reports. These timelines are subject to right-of-way negotiations and the timing of the necessary permits and approvals. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 10 OF 13 PROPOSED FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the Planning Commission recommends City Council find that the applicant's plan satisfies the standards of the Metro Title 3 model ordinance relating to Walkways and Bike Paths. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department and Water Department have had an opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no comments or objections. The Operations Utility Department has had an opportunity to review the proposal and has offered the following comments. Because the proposed trail will parallel an existing sewer trunk line, the trail could provide access for sewer line maintenance and emergency repairs. It also could provide improved access for much needed stream bank stabilization projects. As such, the trail surface should be constructed to support the weight of utility vehicles SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and The Unified Sewerage Agency have had an opportunity to review this proposal and offered no comments or objections. The Oregon Division of State Lands has had an opportunity to review the proposal an offered no comments or objections. The Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development has had an opportunity to review the proposal an offered no comments or objections. The US Army Corps of Engineers has had an opportunity to review the proposal and offered no comments objections. Metro was given an opportunity to comment on the proposal and provided the following comments: Once again, thanks for taking us on the field trip. We all enjoyed being able to see the alignment first hand and to see that two critical needs, providing trail opportunities and protecting natural resources, are being met. Metro is totally supportive of Tigard's efforts to design and build the portion of the Fanno Creek trail that lies in the City. It is a key segment of the entire trail system from the Willamette Park at John's Landing to the Tualatin River. Overall, the City is proposing a reasonable plan to comply with the Title 3 requirements. As discussed on Friday, below are our comments: When the trail abuts a wetland or is in the vegetated corridor of a stream, where possible or practicable, reduce the area of impact through means such as: CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 11 OF 13 • • • Narrowing shoulders (from 2ft to 1ft) with native vegetation and/or grasses • No mowing of the shoulder adjacent to the wetland • Narrowing impervious trail surfaces (from 10ft to 8ft) • Pervious trail surfaces where possible (Gresham is using compacted gravel - call Phil Kidby, Gresham Parks at 612-2530 and Metro is planning to use compacted gravel on the Springwater Corridor Trail - call Dawn Uchiyama, Portland Parks at 823-5596 for more information) • Boardwalks as an alternative along wetlands and at pinch points There are numerous opportunities for restoration of the riparian corridor including removal of non-native, invasive plants and replacing them with native plants. A 3-year plan for . monitoring the success of the restoration projects is recommended. Title 3 requires that any fill added to the floodplain be matched with an equal amount of fill removal to maintain the capacity of the floodplain. Staff Responses: Regarding the necking down of the trail and shoulder, our understanding was that this comment applied to two areas: the wetland area along the edge of the sports field and the portion of the trail alignment located on top of flood control berm. We understood that Metro had no objection to a ten-foot wide trail in the upland areas. In order to avoid user conflicts, we would prefer to build to the state and regional ten-foot standard. City staff is agreeable no mowing of the shoulder adjacent to the sports field wetland. Since the trail route and shoulder is within the existing lawn area, we will need to coordinate with the school district regarding a change to their current practice of mowing the entire sloped area. Pervious surface where possible is a suggestion we have investigated. Other than experimental surfaces and expensive inter-locking pavers, crushed rock appears to be the only feasible alternative surface available. City staff do not view this as an appropriate surface for the Fanno Creek Trail. This is because the trail is intended to be multi- modal, serving pedestrian, bicyclist, wheel chair users, and skaters. Compacted gravel is not suitable for narrow wheeled bikes and roller and in-line skates and is problematic from a maintenance point of view. Therefore, we would prefer to go with an asphalt surface. We plan to use boardwalks at the two locations we pointed out in the field. The plan has been revised to include compensatory excavation, as required under Title 3. The excavation will include removal of the overgrown hard surface basketball court and the grubbing out of the blackberries in the area between the flood control berm and creek bank on the Johnson Street Apt. property. The cleared area will be restored with natural vegetation as described in the project proposal. Engineering is doing the quantity calculations at this time. CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 o CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 12 OF 13 • • • To go back, when we visited the apartment property, we incorrectly identified the trail as running on top of the portion of the berm near the bend in the creek. Instead, the trail is proposed to run over and along the apartment side of the berm and within in the lawn area. It then runs up and back over the berm. For handicapped and ramp safety reasons, we would prefer to not narrow down this section of the trail to eight feet. Our engineers believe this width is too narrow relative to the gradient of the trail and would pose a potential safety hazard to trail users Robert Bothman of the Fanno Creek Trail Working Group has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: I have reviewed the amendment and the plans for segments 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6B. I have visited the segments and support the amendment and plans for these sections. SECTION VII. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS Dewey and Margaret Hamilton have reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: We are retired and walking and riding bicycles along these trails is important to us in maintaining a healthy life style. Being able to walk and ride on a trail with a natural setting rather than a roadway is an important safety feature for us. Ken Tolliver has reviewed the proposal and provided the following comments: I want you to know that at least one family is 100% behind the needed amendments that your are considering. Access to the trail will increase the exposure of local residents to the natural areas along the creek and help them to be more connected with it. Please approve the amendment requests. Mike Meredith has reviewed the proposal and provided comments in support of approving the applicant's proposal. June 9, 1999 PREPARED BY: Mark J. Roberts DATE Associate Planner June 9, 1999 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Planning Manager is lrpin\duane\fannocreektrail.doc CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 CITY OF TIGARD FANNO CREEK TRAIL PAGE 13 OF 13 .igai■ ingsti , �� g Zvi e= �_� I �a CITY o f T ' • e J� �, IV.' ,..,, ,'■ : .: ■=<-�:•=;� i, OL00 AAVNIC INfORYATION tYeTLY • �J' ..' -- ` - Ir 0 ■.41111 as �.. VICINITY MAP om:' ° \\::\‘*t.. \\*414,.. �'•!`: 11111: .1 �IJ iL!=:: •sum um tri �.1: :�i 11. :N Ain CPA 1999-00001 . N . ,`i'IMUIP r'∎• 11 . vi CITY OF TIGARD ��`��' �• ��� FAN NO CREEK r, �, �: . '�'.'�I���. �r►�♦� TRAIL ALIGNMENT • Ns NI•11171W 1 c 4'11 � �` \\ aO t4 a lV 1 16 Subject properties 'fist ail l ► ,� � of 0,•� t . are included in the ■ r UPI` -.qv**4:T ♦ � .. ' ♦� \,,' .A1 trail alignment project . .11111111111111111 ria NW ;j .1 t / S' �t.,. . •j 1�4.4*�� 0��� ����\� �w. ,�� ..,`�♦ , I Streams 01110011111111 *%S. ` �`` • #I ` ♦■♦!�I MAJOR ■■■■ ■11 ``+ ' •�♦' g*+ ' Akt' /fir �/ MINOR. .\\1 1 PI * TlEfp .1 � f4e* Tigard Wetland Inv.lo l ��. ��:,'�.� ► • .A4„v-, ausommo ripow■ \ ■ ‘111Ws**ON. ,,NAS \ II A . 111"*4..ff oinmr 47 i• vitA- ,# ...A* \ mi N 60!vita nroull Elie N it f tr ���. Vft, ••+ ''• \O\ \\ 0 400 800 1200 Feet , r, . .:+.`\\ t'•858 feet � � �■�1111 i' �� � ���,. . .ditt.leiT&A, "r= ��400`-.-01 ep al AI • t."""1110.. ■� �t•∎∎ ♦ ♦ ea �„■ Ciry of Tigard......; 1.0.... ., -�'....,,,, �` r ., �,, tipmr...111111rm Informetve oe this mtp it for topmen Ioution only end i i. ry- '� . ,A ■■ �� should be verified wthe Development$eMOet Oivieion' • .1.`t ■.�.,' �• '', ,,,�'� ", 125 SW Mall BNd■' /� erd•OR 97223. e f f � '� O. s• e.ta,.m..• ,"I.. ■�//, , (503)839-4171 aim „ ,I„” ouga_ nt1pY(503) 399trd.or.ut ME I ii :mummy .EI111111■�■■11,Al `AA. .•,■■■■■■��■�■�!■■�■�■ ■ • Pln}rl�1n• AAw 17 1000•/`•,..+..r.(ntA Rn/�rnno Ann Community Dpvelrnment • • -E-- 40;-1-- • Michael Smith • Michael Smith Properties CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 231235 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT PO Box Tigard 231235 9 35 NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE CITY COUNCIL g (i:\curpin\setup\labels\cpa\cpa 1999-00001 council final order.doc) School District 23J Hammond, David E & Christine N 13137 SW Pacific Hwy 3015 SW 116`h Tigard OR 97223 Beaverton OR 97005 Stevens, Page N Wilshire Real Estate Partnership 9180 SW Burnham Road 1776 Madison St Tigard OR 97223 Portland OR 97205 Sorg, Otto Ball, Robert D PO Box 2971 2255 NW Johnson Suite#1 Portland OR 97208 Portland OR 97210 Wilshire Real Estate Partnership Reed, William C 1776 Madison St PO Box 12564 Portland OR 97205 Portland OR 97212 Snyder, Darold D & Sue A 12937 Water Gap Rd Williams OR 97544 • Metro 600 NE Grand Ave Portland OR 97232 Smith, Charles R & Debra D 10065 SW Johnson St Tigard OR 97223 Casa La Veta Associates PO Box 5886 Portland OR 97228 Dolan & Co LLC 4025 SE Brooklyn Portland OR 97202 ip (:.E. : CP 163g4 —CWO 1 fl FrDpo$ o fl . ai SENDER: I also wish to receive the 72 •Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. following (for an to •Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. 9 services( 0 ■Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): E card to you. v m •Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not 1.❑ Addressee's Address ' •Wat ri te"Return Receipt Requested"on the mailpiece below the article number. 2.❑ Restricted Delivery o • Ito. •The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date Consult postmaster for fee. N delivered. P c ^ ' °'^'^ ^''��^° - 4a.Article Number �� OR. DEPT.OF LAND CONVERVATION & DVT� Z 0 c(, A1114: LARRY Fig 4b.Service Type a[ 1635 CAPITOL STREET NE, SUITE 150 \ ❑ Registered Ck Certified ¢ SALEM, OR •97301-2540 .0 Express Mail ❑ Insured c — — -1 ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD 3 f . 0 7.Date of Delivery o• ¢ 5. Received By: (Print Name) r 8.Addressee's Address(Only if requested ,Y and fee is paid) as w m . cc. 6.Si. atur-I .res•eeorAgent , X % '�1i•__ _� ,> y PS Form 811,December 1994 102595-98-B-0229 Domestic Return Receipt • • Z 4:35 490 568 US Postal Service • Receipt for Certified Mail i No Insurance Coverage Provided. rv,rim..ICA fnr Intematinnal.Mail(See reverse) g '•OR. DEPT.OF LAND CONVERVATION X AWN: . 'LARRY FRENCH - • 635 CAPITOL STREET NE, SUITE 150 • SALEM, OR 97301-2540 . - Postage $ • 1,s 'lU . �U/n Certified Fee ") v 2 Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee r rn . -. g , Retum Receipt Showing to Whom&Date Delivered s a 5 .n Return Receipt Showing toWhom,-A i 6, V cr a Date,&Addressee's Writs--.%.-----", v 0 c TOTAL Postage&IF,e.( '.1�, �- . CO Postmark or Date‘,.[ .../A,"6 • • € v. pv o / ` u. CO �b0 00\° • • • • __ . , . . 1 ,e. ; cPq. 1949 _ , tfPRoPO.E? M fr CAIDA4 UT - ai SENDER: I also wish to receive the 1 ;0 •Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. following services(for an H •Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. a1 •■Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): n card to you. W > ■Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not 1.❑ Addressee's Address r_ w permit. 2.❑ Restricted Delivery m d •Write°Return Receipt Requested°on the mailpiece below the article number.r ry °�. 1 ■The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date . delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. a o 3.Article Addressed to: 4a.Article Number c07+ -- — Z 455-4610 396 =( a 4b.Service Type m E Metro • ❑ Registered l&Certified ¢ u ATTN: LAND USE & PLANNING ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured En 600 NE Grand Avenue ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD Portland, OR 97232-2736 p 7.Date of Delivery ,o S- /3- 9F 0 5.Received By (Print Name) 8.Addressee's Address(Only if requested • and fee is paid) m w L 6.Sign re: (Ad ess a or Agent) ~• y PS Form 381 , :ernbr194 102595-98-B-0229 Domestic Return Receipt . Z 435 490 390 q US Postal Service Receipt for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided. Do not use for International Mail(See reverse) Sent to Metro- -- . . ATTN: LAND USE & PLANNING— ‘.q • 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232-2736 o Postage $ 1 r cif C1 _ t Certified Fee i/ _ . . Special Delivery Fee l ` �� Restricted Delivery Fee I —.--- rn Return Receipt'rstiowing•to 6�� i�5 Whom&Da e.Deliv re ed�,n, f Ot •a Return Receipt Showing to Whef, ' " j < Date,&Addressee's Address,%1 . -414:. ' O TOTAL Pos`a &Frees $ (p yv o Postmark or''ttc,, ON ,N Q - u_ V4 • Co a • • 41 • •• • . ge; (pig 0aq-p i "PrDPo d ArrikreOLoatil • ai SENDER: I also wish to receive the 3 •Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. w •Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. following services(for an 1 y •Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): card to you. U > •Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not 1.❑ Addressee's Address • w permit. C i .2 •Write'Return Receipt Requested°on the mailpiece below the article number. 2.❑ Restricted Delivery t cn •The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date delivered. —°.Consult postmaster for fee. a • o 3.Article Addressed to: 4 •'Article'Nurrtber a cc '1" 4b.Servic Type' : g . ODOT- Region 1, District 2-A r �' � 0 ®\Re is eedG `' °' (Jane Estes, Permit Specialist 1 ...R 9 �-+ [ Certified 5440 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 350 Expr�es 'tl"�``�� ❑ Insured ' w Portland, OR 97221-2414 ❑:Return Recelpt.forMerchandise 0 COD a ta 7.Date of•Deliy ry Z T 5.Received By: (Print Name) 8.Addressee's oldreis (Only if requested Y I ( and fee is paid) R 6.Si.n. ure: .sass--or Agent) 1 >.o X�:"// • / w PS •rm 3811,De(mber 1994 102595-98-B-0229 Domestic Return Receipt ! 1• 2 43-5 4-9:0 567 • US Postal Service Receipt for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided. Do not use for International Mail(See reverse) . ODOT-Region 1, District 2-A l ;Jane Estes, Permit Specialist - .5440 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 350 ,Portland, OR 97221-2414 v)- - o Postage s /, a ( .c • Certified Fee 1 4 146 Special Delivery Fee i' Restricted Delivery Fee �� . ',?^3 �o Return Receipt Showin(tb+ `mil I Whom&Date Deliverer J`�v_�_ 5 I < Date, Addressee's Stowing ' C��f �T Date,&Addressee's � _ i, `I• .. TOTAL Postage&F,-s-‘:,r i, �� Postmark or Date "0-----own`y 2 o - `— - V • cn NOTICE t PROPOSED AMOINDMENT This form must be received by DLCD at least 45 days prior to the final hearing ORS 197.610 and OAR Chapter 660, Division 18 See reverse side for submittal requirements Jurisdiction City of Tigard Date of Final Hearing June 22, 1999 Local File# CPA 1999-00001 Has this proposal been previously submitted to DLCD? Yes x No Date _ Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment X Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Land Use Regulation Amendment Zoning Map Amendment New Land Use Regulation Briefly summarize the proposal. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached." Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water Resources Overlay from 0.30 acres of wetlands as justified by an ESEE analysis for the construction of the multi-use Fanno Creek Trail. Plan Map Change From to Zone Map Change From to Location: Three sites along Fanno Creek Acres Involved: 0.30 between SW North Dakota Street & SW Ash Avenue.change in Density: Current Density N/A Proposed Density N/A Applicable Goals: 5 Is an Exception proposed?_ Yes x No Affected State or Federal Agencies, Local Governments or Special Districts: DSL, Tigard, Metro and the Army Corps. of Engineers. Local Contact: Duane Roberts, Associate Planner Phone: 503-639-4171 Address: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 DLCD File# Date Rec'd #Days Notice • • • r SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ORS 197.610 and OAR Chapter 660,Division 18 1. . Send this Form and Two (2) Copies of the Proposed Amendment to: Department of Land Conservation and Development 1175 Court Street, N.E. Salem, Oregon 97310-0590 COPY TO: Metro Land Use & Planning 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232-2736 - ODOT- Region 1,District 2-A Jane Estes, Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive, Suite 3 Portland, OR 97221-2414 2. Unless exempt by ORS 197.610 (2), proposed amendments must be received at the Salem DLCD office at least 45 days before thefinal hearing on the proposal. 3. Submittal of proposed amendments shall include the text of the amendment and any other information the local government believes is necessary to advise DLCD of the proposal. "Text" means the specific language being added to or deleted from the acknowledged plan or land use regulations. A general description of the proposal is not adequate. 4. Submittal of proposed "map" amendments must include a map of the affected area showing existing and proposed plan and zone designations. The map should be on 8 1/2 by 11 inch paper. A legal description, tax account number, address or general description is not adequate. 5. Submittal of proposed amendments which involve a goal exception must include the proposed language of the exception. If you need more copies of this form, copy it on green paper or call the DLCD office at 503-373-0050. • • v ;' fr SETTING THE STANDARD FOR SERVICE EXCELLENCE Facsimile To: �, cam/ Company: Phone: Fax: (T0(y c3 72 6 From: 4 h RIO �✓- �-•'��- Company: City of Tigard Phone: (503)639-4171 Fax: (503)684-7297 Date: 7/0/5' 2 Pages including this page: Zl COMMENTS: Co, C.-o /4_ /"—) 4 --L.—i 4 L✓ . / C/f/V 77-/ G.� h / r e1-7 74- D h 7 r ei mss— -74 cam., j v A 4 vim_ a � / r-�-2.J < 0 . City of Tigard, 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 ** PLEASE DELIVER THIS FAX IMMEDIATELY ** 05/10/99 17:08 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 0001 4 *************************** *** ACTIVITY REPORT *** *************************** TRANSMISSION OK • TX/R% NO. 5331 CONNECTION TEL 503 362 6705 CONNECTION ID DLCD SALEM START TIME 05/10 16:57 USAGE TIME 11'01 PAGES 21 RESULT OK FishmlEnvironmental Services 43 W Sixth Avenue • Suite 304' Portland, OR 97209-3600 November 17, 1998 . 503-224-0333 o�o NMAN . Bill Parks, Washington County Resource Coordinator ` \\ Oregon Division of State Lands 775 Summer Street NE Salem, OR 97310 • Jan Stuart, Regulatory Specialist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District P.O. Box 2946 Portland, OR 97208-2946 • SUBJECT: Fanno.Creek Trail Wetland Fill and Removal Permit Application for City of Tigard,Oregon T1S R1 W Section 34; T2S RI W Section 2 DSL Number ?; Corps ID Number 98-334 Dear Bill and Jan: At last, please find enclosed the wetland fill and removal permit application for the Fanno Creek Trail project that Duane Roberts, Planner for the City of Tigard, and Vannie Nguyen, Engineering Manager for the City of Tigard, have previously discussed with you. I have also included a conceptual mitigation plan and the Compensatory Mitigation Form. The project is scheduled for construction in early spring 1999, and as always,we very much appreciate your review of the enclosed materials and coordination of the permit application. Please let me know if additional materials are needed or if we need to respond to any comments. Thank you. Sincerely, C‘ lki(AA41/. Ul3 C. Mirth Walker, PWS Wetlands Program Manager c: Duane Roberts, City of Tigard PS: Bill, you may wish to check with Annette Lalka at the DSL, as she was reviewing the wetland delineation reports for this project: Hopefully this application will clarify any confusion over the wetland boundary mapping in the delineation reports. Thank you. G:\1 998\98073\reg_Iet FAX: (503)224-1851 • i Printed on Recycled Paper PLEASE RECYCLE �6 " Division of State Lands N DSL E Compensatory Mitigation Form - S If the permit involves multiple compensatory mitigation projects at different locations then use a separate sheet for each location. Please be sure to complete Item#1 and the grand total acreages for impacts and mitigation, Items #2 and #3. Give breakdowns by Cowardin class only if known. 1. Crr'i' oFTl&ii - n (Applicant) Permit No. (if known) . • MITIGATION SITE LOCATION FOWL i2 SCA40OL Mitigation Site # . ' Adjacent Waterway FA'NA o Ci a e.g.< County Section_ � Township /5 Range / VY Tax Lot(s) /O U.S.G.S. Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) No. 1 f O q o(1 O 151S41DD River Basin Name fr1V(O(r?.P lv WETLAND IMPACTS • 2. What wetland type or types will be filled or converted by your removal-fill project? (Not the compensatory mitigation project.) List all of the types. Where "wetland types" are requested on this form, the Division uses the Cowardinl wetland classification codes found on National Wetland Inventory Maps. Below are the most common wetland types. If your wetland type is not listed, use one of the blank spaces and fill in the appropriate code. Also, indicate the acreage involved for each wetland type you list. 'Acreages should be listed to the 1/100 of an acre if possible. (F=Fill; R=Remove, C=Convert) Acres Acres Acres Acres F R C F R C F R C F R C ❑PEM 030 0i30 -❑ R3RB ❑ E2EM 0 ❑PSS ❑R3UB ❑ E2SS ❑ ❑PFO ❑.R4SB ❑ E2FO' ❑ Grand Total of Wetland Impacts 0.30 Acres COMPENSATORY MITIGATION 3. List all of the wetland types (on the reverse side) that will result from your proposed compensatory mitigation project by mitigation kind and wetland type. Indicate the acreage involved for each wetland type you list. (continued on reverse side) .- : . . . .. REST R; TION . .... . . . Acres . Acres Acres - Acres • ❑ PEM - ❑ R3RB ❑ E2EM ❑ ❑ PSS _ ❑ R3UB ❑ E2SS ❑ ❑ PFO ❑ R4SB ❑ E2F0 ❑ Restoration Total ci Acres _ IV ;':;•:i:--- _ EHAN: E C MEN Acres Acres Acres Acres ❑ PEM ❑ R3RB ❑ E2EM ❑ ❑ PSS ,O S - ❑ R3UB ❑ E2SS ❑ ❑ PFO OW ❑ R4SB ❑ E2F0 ❑ Enhancement Total 0,q0 4-Acres _v�.r-.�t...._,,..:,�...717f.47-;17.7:7_77.7. �?.:xy;-r� ;.-w_e-i�,.s--.c-• r.•r-:.y.•--..-�_.__ . -:�%5'; :';? r_ �„err S•� :<;fw-a:- _ :.r,;.,^,_w�-rr.-+..,.-'-,a- .;{G�--••- ;.. .:'lit. , _ _ _� t. F._ - - ::CREA:� Acres Acres Acres Acres ❑ PEM ❑ R3RB ❑ E2EM ❑ ❑ PSS ❑ R3UB ❑ E2SS ❑ ❑ PFO . ❑ R4SB ❑ E2F0 ❑ 1 Creation Total pc Acres • Grand Total of Wetland Mitigation 0 ,104- Acre _ _-- -V 4. Is part or all of the compensatory mitigation project site a prior converted cropland, a farmed wetland or a former wetland that is now upland? If known, state which type below: 5. If an upland buffer is proposed, please give average width and type: 51--ro (S ADeothl-ray Width (ft.) Acres � �= Forested Scrub/Shrub Herbs/Grasses Buffer Total Acres (�Q 6. Form completed by C C.Mir4h, WA,Ikeg- 1.(.1(9.96 (Signature) (Printed Name) (Date) • I Cowardin,Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States, 1979. Oregon Division of State Lands.Wetland Inventory User's Guide, 1990. fomitfrm.doe 11.1(0•70 • JOINT • OF O • PERMIT APPLICATION FORM • <;:^t` I.4. THIS APPLICATION WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF BOTH AGENCIES ti US Army Corps per ' Z of Engineers ` ' Portland District i e s AGENCIES WLT ASSIGN NUMBERS Corps Action ID Number (98-334) Oregon Division of State Lands Number SEND A SIGNED COPY OF YOUR APPLICATION TO BOTH AGENCIES District Engineer State of Oregon ATTN: CENPP-OP-GP Division of State Lands • P 0 Box 2946 775 Summer Street NE Portland, OR 97208-2946 - Salem, OR 97310 503/326-7730 503/378-3805 • Applicant Name City of Tigard business phone # (503) 639-4171 and Address Attn: Duane Roberts • home phone # 13125 SW Hall•Blvd FAX # (503) 684-7298 Tigard OR 97223 ❑ Co-Applicant Fishman Environmental Services business phone # (503.) 224-0333 ® Authorized Agent Attn: Mirth Walker home phone # ❑ Contractor 434 NW 6th Ave Ste 304 FAX # (503) 224-1851 Name and Address Portland OR 97209 Property Owner City of Tigard and Others - business phone # (if different than applicant) See Attached List home phone # Name and Address FAX # PROJECT LOCATION Street, Road or other descriptive location Legal Description Segment 2 Tigard St. to Tiedeman Ave.; Segment 3 Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Sement 4 Woodard Park to Quarter Section Township Range Grant Ave.; Segment 5 Grant Ave. to Main St.;Segment 6b SE 1/4 34 T1S R1W Main St. South NE & NW 1/4 2 T2S R1W In or Near (City or Town) County Tax Map # Tax Lot # Tigard Washington See Attached List Waterway River Mile Latitude Longitude Wetlands associated with Fanno Creek, "4 miles N of North End: 45° 26' 13" 122° 46' 57" Tualatin River (Fanno Creek RM unknown) South End: 45° 25' 34" 122° 46' 21" Is consent to enter property granted to the Corps and the Division of State Lands? ® Yes ❑ No PROPOSED PROJECT INFORMATION Activity Type: ® Fill ® Excavation (removal) ❑ In-Water Structure ❑ Maintain/Repair an Existing Structure Brief Description: Construct Fanno Creek Trail Segments - multipurpose pedestrian - bicycle trail Fill will involve - cubic yards annually and/or - cubic yards for the total project 544 cubic yards in a wetland or below the ordinary high water or high tide line Fill will be ❑ Riprap ❑ Rock ❑ Gravel ❑ Sand ❑ Silt ❑ Clay ❑ Organics ® Other Borrow material free of unsuitable materials Fill Impact Area is 0.30 Acres; - length; - width; (11,250 SF in Segment 2 and 1,995 SF in Segment 4) Removal will involve - cubic yards annually and/or 52 • cubic yards for the total project (from wetlands) cubic yards below the ordinary high water or high tide line Removal will be ❑ Riprap ❑ Rock ❑ Gravel ® Sand ® Silt ® Clay ❑ Organics ❑ Other Removal.Impact Area is same as fill area (see attached Wetland Impact Area Calculations Summary Sheet) Is the Disposal area: Upland? ® Yes ❑ No Waterway/Wetland? ❑ Yes ® No Are you aware of any Endangered Species on the project site? ❑ Yes ® No If'Yes, please explain in the project Are you aware of any Cultural Resources on the project site? ❑ Yes ® No description (on page 2, block 4) Is the project site near a Wild and Scenic River? ❑ Yes ® No • PROPOSED PROJECT PURPOSE& DESCRIPTION Sheet O. Wetland Impact Area Calculations - Project Purpose and Need: Sheet Index: Summary (Fill / Removal Calculations) Sheet 1. Trail Location Map See Attached Information. Sheet 2. Segment 2 Trail Location and Wetland Impact and Bridge Over Summer Creek Sheet 3. Segment 3 Trail Location Sheet 4. Segment 4 Trail Location and Wetland Impact and Bridge Project Description: Over Fanno Creek See Attached Information. Sheet 5. Segment 5 Trail Location Sheet 6.. Segment 6b Trail Location and Bridge Over Fanno Creek Sheet 7. Existing Conditions and Proposed Enhancement Mitigation Sheet 8. Proposed Planting Specifications How many project drawing sheets are included with this application? Sheet 9. Digitized Aerial Photograph of Mitigation Site NOTE: A complete application must include drawings and a location map suomittea on separate t3 Y2 X 11 sheets. Will any material, construction debris, runoff, etc. enter a wetland or waterway? ❑ Ygs ® No If yes, describe the type of discharge (above) and show the discharge location on the site plan. Estimated start date: early 1999 Estimated Completion Date: within 6 months of start date © PROJECT.IMPACTS AND ALTERNATIVES Describe alternative sites and project designs that were considered to avoid impacts to the waterway or wetland. See Attached Information. Describe what measures you will use (before and after construction) to minimize impacts to the waterway or wetland. See Attached Information. . • NOTE: If necessary, use additional sheets. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION Adjoining Property Owners and Their Addresses and Phone Numbers • See Attached Information. . • Has the proposed activity or any related activity received the attention of the Corps of Engineers or the State of Oregon in the past, e.g. wetland delineation, violation, permit, lease request', etc.? ® Yes ❑ No - Wetland Delineation Reports (2) submitted March 31, 1998 and June 2, 1998 If yes, what identification number(s) were assigned by the respective agencies: Corps # 98-334 State of Oregon # CITY/COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT (to be completed by local planning official) ❑ This project is not regulated by the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. ❑ This project has been reviewed and is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. ❑ This project has been reviewed and is not consistent with the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. ' o Consistency of this project with the local planning ordinance cannot be determined until the following local approval(s) are obtained: ❑ Conditional Use Approval ❑ Development Permit N4 Plan Amendment ❑ Zone Change ❑ Other An a•'n. has ❑ has o been made for local approvals checked above. � < 5 TIGARD !/ Signature (of local planning offi•a" Titl ✓ City/County Date COASTAL ZONE CERTIFICATION If the proposed activity described in your permit application is within the Oregon coastal zone, the following certification is required before your application can be processed. A public notice will be issued with the certification statement which will be forwarded to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development for its concurrence or objection. For additional information on the Oregon Coastal Zone Management Program, contact the department at 1 175 Court Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97310 or call 503/373-0050. CERTIFICATION STATEMENT 1 certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the proposed activity described in this application complies with the approved Oregon Coastal Zone Management Program and will be completed in a manner consistent with the program. NOT APPLICABLE Print/Type Name Title Applicant Signature Date SIGNATURE FOR JOINT APPLICATION (REQUIRED) Application is hereby made for the activities described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this information is true, complete, and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority including the necessary requisite property interests to undertake the proposed activities. I understand that the granting of other permits by local, county, state or federal agencies does not release me from the requirement of obtaining the permits requested before commencing the project. I understand that local permits may be required before the state removal-fill permit is issued. I understand that payment of the required state processing fee does not guarantee permit issuance. DUANE ROBERTS PLANNER Print/Type Name Title l ////7/f S Applicant Signature /Date I certify that I may act as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. MIRTH WALKER WETLANDS PROGRAM MANAGER Print/Type Name Title Fjs4mak &,y. SVGS . MAM4A.....A,\!ziar Agent Signature Date • • • illr■■•••■111■MI SUPPLEMENTAL WETLAND IMPACT INFORMATION* (FOR WETLAND FILLS ONLY) • Site Conditions of impact area Impact area is ❑ Ocean ❑ Estuary ❑ River ❑ Lake ❑ Stream ® Freshwater Wetland (associated with Fanno Creek) Note: Estuarian Resource Replacement Is required by state law for projects involving Intertidal or tidal marsh alterations. A separate Wetlands Resource Compensation Plan may be appended to the application. Has a wetland delineation been completed for this site? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, by whom: Mirth Walker and Stacy Benjamin, Fishman Environmental Services, 1998 (two reports): Wetland Delineation Fanno Creek Trail. T1S, R1W, SE 1/4 Section 34& T2S, R1W,NE& NW 1/4 Section 2, Washington County, Tigard, Oregon. Prepared for Duane Roberts, Planner, City of Tigard. March 31, 1998. FES Project 97126. Wetland Delineation Supplement, Fanno Creek Trail: Woodard Park Site, T2S R1W NW 1/4 Section 2, Washington County, Tigard, Oregon. Prepared for Duane Roberts, Planner, City of Tigard. May 27, 1998. FES Project 97126. Describe the existing Physical and biological character of the wetland/waterway site by area and type of resource (use separate sheets and photos, if necessary) See Attached Information. Resource Replacement Mitigation Describe measures to be taken to replace unavoidable impacted wetland resources See Attached Information. ` Because this information is not necessary for a complete application, you may submit this sheet and other environmental information after submitting you application. • • • ATTACHED TEXT BY SECTION - FANNO CREEK TRAIL November 16, 1998 JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION @ and © PROPERTY OWNERS OF TRAIL ALIGNMENT. BY TAX LOT Tax lots listed in geographical order beginning with the most northerly property. 1S1 34DD 1000 Tigard-Tualatin School District District #23-J 13137 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, OR 97223 2S1 3AA 101 Tigard-Tualatin School District • 2S1 2BB 600 Metro Regional Parks and Greenspaces 600 NE Grand Ave. Portland, OR 97232-2736 2S1 2BB 832 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97009 2S1 2BA 300 Wilshire Real Estate Partnership 1776 SW Madison St., #300 Portland, OR 97205 2S1 2BA 2000 Ronald and Gayle Wicks 12345 SW Grant Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 • . 2S1 2BA 1501 City of Tigard . • 2S1 2BA 1400 Robert Ball 2255 NW Johnson Ste #1 Portland, OR 97210 2S1 2AC 700 Dolan & Co. LLC (not in adjoining property owner list). By Florence T. Dolan 4025 SE Brooklyn Portland, OR 97202 2S1 2AC 200 Page Stevens (not in adjoining property owner list) 9180 SW Burnham Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 • FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 1 November 16, 1998 2S1 2AC 1 101 Dave & Christine Hammon (not in adjoining property 3015 SW 116th Ave owner list) Beaverton, OR 97005 2S1 2AC 1100 Otto Sorg (not in adjoining property By First Interstate Bank owner list) • Trust Real Estate T-12 PO Box 2971 Portland, OR 97208 2S1 2AC 204 City of Tigard 2S1 2DB 500 City of Tigard Project Purpose and Need: The project is the construction of five segments of a pedestrian/bike trail to connect to the existing trail sections along Fanno Creek. The trail is a goal of the City of Tigard as outlined in the City's adopted Tigard Park Master Plan, which calls for a Fanno Creek recreational trail running the length of the Creek within the city, extending from Tigard's northern city limits downstream to the confluence with the Tualatin River. Thus far, about twenty per cent of the Fanno Creek trail system, consisting of six discontinuous sections, has been completed. The present project proposes the construction of five additional Fanno Creek trail segments. Recent City surveys indicate a high demand for recreational trails, and the existing sections of the trail receive extensive use by citizens. The Fanno Creek trail is a part of the four-county, Forty-Mile Loop regional trail system originally proposed in 1903. Project Description: The proposed five trail segments consist of a 10 foot wide paved pathway (shoulder is additional). The five segments are, from north to south: Segment 2: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (Fowler School Site) Wetland Impact Area: 11 ,250 SF (750 linear feet); 52 CY excavation; 427 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Summer Creek Segment 3: Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park (Woodard Park Site) Segment 4: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue Wetland Impact Area: 1,995 SF (133 linear feet); 0.17 CY excavation; 117 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Segment 5: Grant Avenue to Main Street Segment 6b: Main Street South Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Total Wetland Impact Area: 13,245 SF (0.30 acre) or 833 linear feet of trail; 52.17 CY removal and 544 CY fill FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 2 November 16, 1998 • . Three bridges are part of the project, and will span Fanno Creek (twice) and Summer Creek from top-of-bank to top-of-bank. For reference, Segment 1 is already under construction and goes from N. Dakota Street to Tigard Street. OO PROJECT IMPACTS AND ALTERNATIVES Describe alternative sites and project designs that were considered to avoid impacts to the waterway or wetland. Alternative sites are limited due to the intended location.of the trail adjacent to Fanno • Creek, the location of the existing trail system, and .the City's ownership and easement procurement. Segment 2, Tigard Street to Tiedeman. Avenue, has unavoidable wetlands present. Beginning at Tigard Street, the trail is routed outside the wetland boundary and crosses the unavoidable portion of the wetland near its narrowest section. The trail then skirts the edge of the wetland and the edge of the playing field and associated equipment (fitness course signs, workout equipment stations, and ballfield backstop) and impacts only. a narrow fringe of mowed and disturbed wetland. All Oregon ash trees on the north side of Fanno and Summer Creeks are avoided, and only emergent wetland is impacted. The bridge crosses Summer Creek where no adjacent wetlands are present, and then joins with Tiedeman Avenue to connect with Segment 3. Segment 3, Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands in the park as well as the ODOT mitigation area north of the park for the Highway 217/Kruse Way Interchange project. Segment 4, Woodard Park to Grant Avenue: The trail skirts above the wetland boundary where possible, impacting a narrow fringe of emergent wetland on the north side of Fanno Creek. Two Oregon ash trees on the north bank of Fanno Creek have to be removed for the bridge (please note that the tree survey incorrectly identified trees). The trail is aligned in an upland area on the south side of Fanno Creek and then crosses a narrow neck of unavoidable emergent wetland, avoiding forested wetland areas. Trail alignment is constrained through this segment due to steep upland slopes on the north side of Fanno Creek; the trail has to cross a back-water emergent area on the south side of Fanno Creek to connect with the paved ramp up to Grant Avenue. Impacts to the backwater wetland area are avoided by constructing a boardwalk bridge across the wetland area, with piers in the upland (top-of-bank to top-of-bank). Segment 5, Grant Avenue to Main Street avoids wetlands. The trail alignment has been routed outside of the wetland area; it connects with an existing concrete walk located north of Pacific Highway and north of Main Street. FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 3 November 16, 1998 Segment 6b, Main Street South: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands, and a large section of the proposed trail on the east side of Fanno Creek was scrapped due to the extensive amount of wetlands present. A part of the trail in this section is a boardwalk, to raise the trail up and avoid excessive fill (in uplands) near the top-of- bank of Fanno Creek. In this segment, the location of the bridge crossing Fanno Creek was constrained by the City's easements on the adjoining properties (and by construction of a new building south of Main Street on the east side of Fanno Creek). The trail continues in upland on the west side of Fanno Creek to connect with the existing paved pathway. A southern portion of this trail segment connects to the Ash Street right-of-way, avoiding wetlands on both sides of the trail. Describe what measures you will use (before and after construction) to minimize impacts to the waterway or wetland. Standard best management erosion control practices (such as silt fences and biofilter bags, as outlined in the Unified Sewerage Agency Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans, Technical Guidance Handbook) will be specified in the construction documents prepared by the City of Tigard. - • • FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 4 November 16, 1998 SUPPLEMENTAL WETLAND IMPACT INFORMATION* (FOR WETLAND FILLS ONLY) Describe the existing Physical and biological character of the wetland/waterway site by area and type of resource•(use separate sheets and photos, if necessary) The wetlands along the trail alignment have been delineated and described in the two wetland delineation reports prepared by FES in the spring of 1998. The two impact areas are described in this section. • The northernmost impact area is in Segment 2, on the Fowler School site owned by the Tigard-Tualatin School District. The trail skirts a broad flood plain of Fanno Creek . dominated by reed canarygrass and meadow foxtail, and crosses a narrow neck of • the wetland that extends away from the floodplain area (this wetland neck extends upslope to the west, offsite to a wetland seep area). The trail then impacts a narrow grassy fringe of emergent wetland east of the school ball field and west of an Oregon ash wetland forest which is immediately adjacent to Fanno Creek. Part of this wetland area is regularly mowed as lawn associated with the ball field. Soils in the floodplain area were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silty clay loam, with no redox concentrations to 6 inches, over a very dark gray (10YR 3/1 ) stiff clay, with brown (10YR 5/3) redox concentrations to a depth of 16 inches. Soils in an upslope position near the crossing of the wetland neck were a very dark gray (10YR 3/1 ) silty clay loam to 16 inches, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations, and gray (10YR 5/1) depletions at 14 inches. The floodplain receives highwater over-bank flows from Fanno Creek and has a high groundwater table. The other segment with wetland impacts is Segment 4, north of Grant Avenue. The trails passes through an emergent meadow associated with the floodplain of Fanno Creek. The meadow area is dominated by bentgrass and reed canarygrass, and has soils that were a very dark grayish brown and dark grayish brown (1'OYR 3/2 and 4/2) sandy silt loam, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations and dark gray (5Y 4/1) depletions in the surface 10 inches. The soils had a compacted hardpan at 10 inches, possibly disturbed from previous sewer line construction. The second wetland crossing in this segment occurs on the opposite (south) side of Fanno Creek, where the trail crosses a narrow finger of sparsely-vegetated, disturbed wetland dominated by climbing nightshade and red-osier dogwood, with Himalayan blackberry on the slopes. The trail avoids the surrounding Oregon ash and red alder trees near the trail. Water quality in this backwater area appears to have been negatively impacted by trash and debris. FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 9 November 16, 1998 Resource Replacement Mitigation Describe measures to be taken to replace unavoidable impacted wetland resources The proposed conceptual mitigation plan calls for the mitigation of the 0.30 acre wetland impact by enhancing 0.90 acre of non-forested, reed canarygrass- and meadow foxtail-dominated wetland, located in the floodplain area east and south of an Oregon ash wetland forest adjacent to Fanno Creek, on the Fowler School site in Segment 2. This provides a 3:1 enhancement ratio and mitigates adjacent to the largest wetland impact incurred by the trail system. The existing wetland forest area is dominated by Oregon ash and reed canarygrass, with scattered clumps of Piper's willow, clustered wild rose, and Douglas' spirea. The wetland will be enhanced by planting large Oregon ash saplings and Piper's willow cuttings, to extend the forested wetland area into the meadow area, and appropriate shrubs (clustered wild rose, red-osier dogwood, and Pacific ninebark) will be planted adjacent to the existing forest near the trail to provide additional wildlife habitat. The trail will still remain open and not obscured by the plantings (for security reasons). The attached drawings explain the proposed trail alignment and wetland mitigation plan. • FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 10 November 16, 1998 i S MITIGATION PLAN - FANNO CREEK TRAIL - FOWLER SCHOOL SITE IMPACT AREA: 0.30 Acre Emergent Wetland MITIGATION AREA: 0.90 Acre Enhancement Wetland MITIGATION LOCATION: Fowler School, Segment 2, between the trail and Fanno Creek, outside the existing wetland forest EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS (ADDITIONAL SITE VISIT 9/9/98) Vegetation . The existing wetland forest area is dominated by Oregon ash and reed canarygrass, with scattered clumps of Piper's willow, clustered wild rose, and Douglas' spirea. Patches of orange balsam, slough sedge and smooth scouring-rush are present. The • following species are present in trace amounts: Pacific ninebark, red-osier dogwood, ornamental hawthorn, leafy beggars-tick, rice cutgrass, and climbing nightshade. A table of the vegetation noted on-site in the mitigation area is shown below. Reed canarygrass dominates the majority of the wetland meadow east and south of the forest. Meadow foxtail dominates a portion of the meadow, especially near the trail crossing area (it appears to compete well with reed canarygrass). Several isolated Oregon ash trees are present in the meadow, as well as patches of clustered wild rose and spirea. A few small clumps of small-fruited bulrush and slough sedge are present, as well as quite a bit of wooly sedge and birdsfoot-trefoil. It should be noted that the reed canarygrass in the forest is approximately 3 feet tall and spindly, whereas the reed canarygrass in the meadow is taller and more robust, and has a thicker mat of _root-thatch; an enhancement goal is to shade the reed canarygrass to lessen its vitality and provide greater vegetational and structural diversity. • VEGETATION OF THE FOWLER SCHOOL WETLAND FOREST AND MEADOW Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Status meadow foxtail Alopecurus pratensis FACW leafy beggars-tick Bidens frondosa FACW+ wooly sedge Carex lanuginosa OBL slough sedge Carex obnupta OBL red-osier dogwood Corpus sto/onifera FACW ornamental hawthorn Crataegus monogyna FACU + smooth scouring-rush Equiseturn /aevigatum FACW. Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia FACW FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 11 November 16, 1998 i • VEGETATION OF THE FOWLER SCHOOL WETLAND FOREST AND MEADOW Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Status orange balsam Impatiens capensis FACW rice cutgrass - Leersia oryzoides OBL birdsfoot-trefoil Lotus corniculatus FAC - reed canarygrass Phalaris arundinacea FACW Pacific ninebark Physocarpus capitatus FACW- Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU • clustered wild rose . Rosa pisocarpa FAC Piper's [Hooker] willow Salix piped [hookeriana] FACW [FACW-] small-fruited bulrush Scirpus microcarpus . OBL Douglas' spirea Spiraea doug/asii FACW climbing nightshade Solanum dulcamara FAC+ Soils Soils in the floodplain and forest area are mapped as the hydric Cove silty clay loam, which are poorly drained soils that formed in recent clayey alluvium on floodplains. On-site soils in the drier portions of the wetland were a very dark gray (10YR 3/1 ) stiff clay to silty clay loam, with brown (10YR 5/3) and dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations (mottles), and gray (10YR 5/1) depletions (mottles). The very dark gray chroma matches the surface horizon of the Cove soil; it is likely that soils sampled in the wetter portions of the floodplain would exhibit the darker matrix colors typical of the subsoil of Cove soils (very dark gray (N 4/0) clay), with dark yellowish brown and dark reddish brown mottles. The on-site soils are mapped accurately. Hydrology The floodplain receives highwater over-bank flows from Fanno Creek and has a high groundwater table. The existing ground in the floodplain area is very hummocky, and many anthills are present (the latter is an anecdotal indicator of wetland hydrology). The Cove soil series typically experiences common, brief duration flooding during the months of December to April (Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon, USDA SCS, 1982). During these same months, the soil survey lists this soil as having a perched high water table within 0 to 12 inches of the surface. . FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION. Page 12 November 16, 1998 S Reference Site The existing Oregon ash forest provides an ideal reference wetland for the proposed mitigation. Appropriate species from the reference site have been chosen for use in the mitigation plan. Wetland soils and wetland hydrology are already present. Enhancing the wetland meadow by providing vegetational diversity is achievable. PROPOSED ENHANCEMENT PLANTS The following plants have been chosen for use in this mitigation plan, based on their natural occurrence in the on-site reference wetland and desirability for wildlife habitat and aesthetics: COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME WETLAND TREES Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia Piper's [Hooker] willow Salix piperi [hookerianal WETLAND SHRUBS red-osier dogwood Cornus stolonifera [sericea] Pacific ninebark. Physocarpus capitatus clustered wild rose Rosa pisocarpa The attached drawings show existing conditions and the enhancement area. The size and spacing of the plants in the enhancement area are shown on the attached planting plan. The mitigation goal is, simply, to enhance existing reed canarygrass- dominated wetland by creating a natural looking Oregon ash forest with a willow forest around its perimeter, and increasing the wildlife value along the existing forest perimeter with enhanced shrub plantings. PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS • The mitigation enhancement area will be flagged in the field prior to mitigation construction. Trees and shrubs are to be balled and burlapped or in containers. Bare root plants are allowed if nursery-grown proof is available. All plants will be flagged for identification, to enable' monitoring of plant survival rate. Soil compaction form power machinery and damage to existing forest vegetation must be kept to a minimum. Substitution of plant species must be approved by the City's representative (Fishman Environmental Services). • Oregon Ash Forest 1 . Installation needs to occur in September/October of the construction year. Soil should be moist. FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 13 November 16, 1998 . .1 2. Randomly select planting locations within the transect. 3. Remove reed canarygrass top growth and root thatch within a 3-foot diameter circle around the planting location center point. 4. Dig a hole twice the diameter of the root ball and place the soil to the side. Place the plant in the hole so the top of the root mass is even with the adjacent ground level. Hold the plant in place and place loose topsoil around the roots. Lightly tamp the soil around the roots to remove large air pockets. 5. If the soil is. not saturated during planting, then each individual plant will be . watered at the time of planting (approximately.1 gallon of water per plant). 6. Upon completion of installation, place a mulch (chipped woody material) around the plant stem in a 3-foot radius, 3 inches deep. Willow Forest 7. Select live cutting of willow from the surrounding area. - 8. The cuttings will be taken during the winter months and planted within 2 days of collection. 9. The cuttings will be 4 to 5 feet in length and consist of one and two year old growth. 10. The cut ends must remain moist until planted, and leaves (if present) carefully removed to avoid bark injury. 11 . At the planting location, open the soil to a 1-foot depth with a spade or shovel. Insert the cutting into the soil wedge and push deeper another 4 to 6 inches to ensure complete soil contact. Tamp soil around cutting. Shrub Enhancement Area Planting specifications are the same as for the Oregon Ash Forest (numbers 1-6). MONITORING After the first year after planting, all plant specimens will be counted and vigor will be assessed. An annual monitoring report will be prepared for 3 or 5 years as determined by DSL to document the survival of enhancement plants. Phototransects will be permanently marked. The site will be monitored in accordance with DSL and Corps guidelines. • SUCCESS CRITERIA The enhancement will be considered successful if 80 percent of the planted trees and shrubs (by. each individual species) survive. Additional saplings and shrubs will be planted as necessary as the project progresses to meet the 80 percent survival target. FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION . Page 14 November 16, 1998 G:11998\98073\attach text.wpd FANk(0 C2Ee- je-A1L__ • ClIk( 6F I Wetland Impact Area Calculations Summary Existing Ground = Surface Area (not including shoulder) .= Surface Area (including shoulder) Finish Grade L. B = Softdesk Calculated Volumes 0.9167' 0 = Path Structure Section �, 12.5' AVG Segment 2: Stal3+50 to 16+50(300') Sta 17+75 to 22+25(450') .Totals Al = 3000 SF " Al =4500 SF Al =7500 SF A2 =4500 SF A2 =6750 SF A2= 11250 SF Bcut= 31 CY Bcut=21 CY Bcut= 52 CY Bfill =64 CY Bfill =45 CY Bfill= 109 CY C= 127CY C = 191CY C=318CY Segment 3: No Impact Segment 4: Sta 14+25 to 14+33(8') Sta 14+75 to 15+50 (75') Sta 16+75 to 17+25 (50') Al =80 SF Al =750 SF Al =500 SF • A2= 120 SF A2= 1125 SF A2 =750 SF Bcut=0.03 CY Bcut=0.14 CY Bcut=0 CY Bfill= 0.88 CY Bfill= 18 CY . Bfill=42 CY C= 3CY C = 32CY C =21 CY Sta 19+50 to 19+75 Totals Bridge Construction Al = 1330 SF • • (Temporary Impact) A2= 1995 SF Bcut= 0.17 CY Bfill= 61 CY C =56CY Segment 5: No Impact Segment 6B: No Impact TTAcL_ R Ll_- - A 2 = 1-2) -1 5 F < � ' 3 ° P's-c-' " CV Fanno Creek Trail Permit 11 = S << "� C _ J Sheet p of q 11/98 �OTPd. FEMOVACL— c A, — Si 5Z, 17 1 SEE 625 MAR 6 �:® � . � ,•: �, .. x�tY U IJ P•�!at:,,,.. �e�0100000oL'���.A,P•�1 4 s�1n11,-- IS�GIfSfiw��tS "- .. ��_ ���. :.�asf��la�t�®�Qi_©���7:192 :101 YI '��:t�'S!L T7[•aR�j=� a fir.,r 1�I I . ((�y,.� , ■ r sY l:• •J ' 1,' rP La T ul ±�� 1r �,. "rl'-' f■ a• �"�"'-�••,2.7f1 yT1r•1Y r A '1 ? g�' r/ jai NueE , :a t�. �� : y� © © C,. 0`V( �.� ST 4. 6�W��� ,t,i,' '4tu0turr • ,AA A w i?... 28 L7. . Z r b tt y r;,�y i LFRED .• .xu r n d , �i• // p C2.3/•'�:i A^ BORDERS E , '% '' ff`:' °r�,E4:,5' ';si..n ,/;�' S�"a 'hC:II�YKMI v♦ A- - W1fR ,� 1 % yu Q ])00 A `•W .• 't-f'ENiUPA'• I x J' - ,7�n:.•{�% �, ` m 4f °�` 5T AA, _ ST r.F73 r• 7� lA' '4 - '2� i. , A A�L Mlii'R .�'•. F-'r y7717'� ��':• t t r - � �r�..# p y�� i Y � I�Da ,. �I•SN .+N OS •`d ��., tl •fG O IC[p'' ' �{ 7 •���! y 6 = p P.y�"ry TW ? • i' `ti a 3, JC71:!i_��7llf � . vi R 6.' i .._ .mot_• r 7'i? — �l .,, - ':E •'�i i iN1D,:t,'� `,,,, 0i1 �� ! �u llllll N� I II_..rr'���•�� "�5'I�E t■: HOL 210 t ..y. TDwq X�r�' + r�,1.rp" -!.L' '/ :` u,'[ t...,.. �"5 5�.4' t E P1NE >~vii4e.. op €wri^�W,, 7 :h;r ], ` "hy t {;' A ilx+a z, , si .il• �� r w,�y"p "?, 0 . ,jc, tz... ., Q . 4—..,wig... .*, ..0 t wrcc. ,.1 y f •;,i'; ©�� T! j�.. ,7^ �r/� Z N•.Ls1 R{ .[7"1 �`•, 4 }.. 'P« -1 �r:. r" A0 / v'..'ag•.^-1f` 't 1„, r �rzaj a '� �� /� _ I' -wit �25: ' !,� .:o" ." + a .4,21 rrt�t;i t t� 1• ' - •s,' . of ,. ��j (s!$I �0 14 Air €_ 1. E_ .A!'j,.rD® A.,-„ 'f "ia0 iw,.rtta•, „- ',,,10,'�4�"" '„,t.L`:U ld7, '''n '` `�r1-'t' ..___. r �^ #: '.Qt \ .{P ''-I�'I ! 11 X33 R;!�__.n�t!Y.�t'a'PJ •.®,o�•r �� .n. __ ,mss.. � _ �(® ' .sq ,��' �'4;• ®I t't. � — -1f� — _ r+ �y7y 03, g�gtjt t r� � rf y �• I� '+' W�t�s � iLiJ !L� ,tin@ E't:�tet r� �n ,t Yr,.z'. ' s'Y99Wlh4h rift,• 7 31 u. ® �, ri �r gig) (47-7,71''' .kY »'A ,r,M1. <+(, v,t�c ‘:IG 1: 9 = �' ,2'' r ;'4'1, Ve.„ S Z, l P!^' Q `L11 . m, �ct,t + s. . pprox. Trail Alignment i e , 54611 ,- � � �, , �y . ,,, , , '' ° �' S , g 0:_.,--„, ;. ' 't„�, :^r�+�. �Ce, k �� �:, ` :t,. .4 .'.i 6�,°„t. <(\, , � xI•.,� 'N$W F .�'• e ,ry J � r� Pr rrr c•yt�• e•� •�mI2 .� 4�+.!.L]I'f Y'- gQ,v� � .� yi� ^ u !� '"i d 1 .•` L-y lur ET � u{ r...a t� a ., : ,1. t�t�:'7' ' r A A s;i1P c�11,5:'l Nw'1, e ,i4 f j v Jyj'' " pY / ''' ,, h'i,' �®r'' ID,” „ ! St�I �' -:�v/:r E•' a 4 'm' <�.- 4 E� 1 �9 {it �'. e`- 4 ^t'r 8'�j f{ .. `+ C'tt77 M1ri' ^; .v:2x.,�t � SN NAINES i• ,P :,, ,+,w,,,,.i+. r: P1' r " f�; L A a.... k ,'` ems' (e ,4k _ t. —'s 1/44::. T;*.A. a''' -4( st ♦ {`� 1'l•{r's ®: � :'t,, <"''G �11-_ le �,, . .° .L,,�a1� '� \` ` r.Yi'. {�.,,t. n �. t� ���rl 4 .T . ,.�.� .R1 yti' EM �G' © i ,.3 6'( ^ �' J. \� C.7, l ai .V(F,l�;; a •'C' �' .,R_t( !A t, 'l _ Fi'„ ��, -.':, 'c 11^!x' I) S' ,,.I o5,41,te ♦� : ,�: �.�,� CIS' �11��j _ r ., ..Yyp :, 1 v c.b °V ,.1", ... J , •�A� IQ @ , e°�o e •t i, y,(��yy'� 1 },..y'47M1,. ,' , 'M1">,1 ,•t'i \Sl" E Ey e r�'ti •'7 : „fir [� � M' i,r 5U' d yd.`., �. '�rP "Mf` �i. .f aM.1. '��L • 1 �� ,Cx�.'3i:•,...,'Y) f � ' �'`' 91E': •, ��-r , ,4," ,,, .f.am.4,,Z.� a ,A, �i ,i!A r _.____--2-1-t--•+" _-, � �''-w"' f,!>r r � �? C 77074_ ®9tf3F.1'fi n.� L y na3� . t_ +,r/ _6 i�''r �w�� B' r"�, 9`;,,:� :.'` ���+ 7: ...,,‹.njt �''2- ,..t,- %�`. v •rj%00 / � X71.:4 ,,, E.'i. .,,,,;l, r.,,,,, ,t i",..i�i' "-,-,P a�.ria+'�r'.751c27Zlil!" �w®(�,� _ 4.' T'." 'A' ,idl:! F-iC� "g ttst �;eTzf np�A (�Ql 4C+', 7�y�p'(�' x..}ar 1 r:,C �. :,+1 _ a.::L:w�-Ai[1141. e�",,.A=t r.to E ' N �11 of§•' � � A��.•, „x �'ay7''`i'!q �Y�pR+^�'t "..•�� %-L�",�V i 4i '#{\� + ! `t t I .i ' - - ., ;a � P0r �� � t;T^ A *�`: W`, � e� 7 ,Al tiY '`7x� a� _„�R,+�,,. , ' � NkL2N I �� O/•vl '7 33, � '� A'�2{., �. r!`. SY'�� .��� 'S. / f�. �l/}��i'S (���' '�,�i'Y` :C p � �'�i�1i17 T•�'1.5: p ( .. wR n+M E � I .. ',t ,, :. ':i•A rt' i u 5 ��� r�`'r+: -iS•1 + a'r:' _ 6? 01 ♦D p, •.....,.... ALNUT .1 3': .:, y A sF �"'1!n �JYf''Gv �'f '7 f ��`P�`'), c�� G4'�, V . t�y,�.��'x7ty �..'10.,1:4'4 i; - y `A e l ,c�T ♦ Z >15200.1 900 S ,l•t• y:,, iGq f. fIw'`�tj f,�,y t `C !^t'7.,sT'FF,IW J ' •;�•"..• ++ y,; 1pI `•f' p,< 'St 'c�!!K .' ` -:3ii/��,d� •h • � ,Q'+ r r �+ nb tr,'�'r, ii � x;,,ii .�i tdj j'AE',l'1•. �, XM' ,' ® ',D !got n I,, w�i.4. 1 t iw1 Sy IL6N T . �•�•,I d ry •,'t)./ iN9/ d '"7r(.t e'r r a � a. ♦' 4' j�� t5.. fit'+ 7e.s<.. f RZ, t. y� 3 yPpy±±�, ,,■?'• +. o. 'J <° R ST t'Qd'-t ,.�'' i.:''„ ♦,' . !:..� r .�•Y, ,f{�.+. r �Rl.'i�,? �Y''.,.. Frti..�.*.•.,.,o„•• A�\`,{,��_�` 3 � I •13 gs — l w� <I- dpi'....It r,`• __ :,, r:-,...l '.. i 7St� i '''A,r'tn'i-'1�4L1,40,,12A i�4:..Wr,., ::St4 a:'t:::...t�rt ip,:`,./^:.'U�:ir:.'�«. :l:r'+. `,`.T.,,mLL��tl �l _._0,,,:?.. 71', ��_.. 1�•".�"� '�„� 12100 k✓ _ y:. •1 ;. ?, ,... �t2' .'3' ti'ti y p1•'16c !Y.a : ^'L_421' ''T19 ', .i t I ?�ir"G'�_naTt -�� iU Ky.�j' '�:BSC� _ N MARION ST _ v � ����''`4,, :? �.y r 'r3 'i �x,,�,�,.,•`'1 b A•'„[�':�'��,i�,�';�O �°•'r:,� � � �.'.• l;. .. .' �� �,pac , `i'? ,' ggilimil. �,, •• .�`�•`ir1>j's'h ' ' t.sol$,- , ,, 1 t,t i. ' 2p''7t 7 r- '��tls d`t' 1� f�1 ti R ti�' .4, .k4 ��r _ x`r 3, ,,, „� )i'yf ..,4� c i, k t•'' L iy::, }i '^. ; F it's rc' 1 '$ � ,. ' 2+ 1 t•' : aa1' `.i,lv, S�'r` `r�``t1'S � . !` Sr 1, 4 EP' •.''� `" '� Y! riitT�i_h f �,,,,1, ,'!Pr `.4,•,(-�� 2•. " s d&s.uM silt ri tt r[ Q.•.4, _ .., 217 S: '.1�i,r ',.;,, .� .4:,,,r. ' r.. �; y $ i , 4.1�i��,,�61*�_, .m 11 C'•G N1 ,a,,,t;1.4.4.i•.9` .'fts pr:i ,,T A i t[,, �j ' G + L'. I� Q► : 1• .c,' 1a't :i 'rkf(1 17;t'S t +t 1.r..,''''' ' '' �s$ T''''' 7°T, ' 5i },*-14''''''',..'a 'r ) SW r i �I �:'�c :,.. .r 9' raJ ,M p'A't .SY c, 4. 'Y7,/`f L�'��3t�.tti',t tf:::l� i'4 ! +i;�N,�(', ,.•' p �i' •,a, r ♦,to .. ^-t1 `v + M1.t;t. 'wJr X! CI' I .1 ). ,,1'lt4i: rt F04,,, ,t' 7 ,467 t• • ,�. a'S1hi ,r , t. a B „rid 1111 [ i -A-K ry�{' t w � i', U ut i� ,t' �Y t t d dC°�� fib a t'4 ktkr 'ay r•• EaErl�i�xl L Y .e) ! ■ i, mj7t41Q :aka . i ;f1 e� ayi �tr� k r • 4� V'r,, I LGi, I r � � 'fi.Y11L•�7 r•P,{I.- '�� — a 1j' "a 22`4∎ - i..t._n..,.:~. e:'C:.traTA'= 44V¢i�t.; i:,w1,F:4"''.g,i .. : _� /�� 'rrs :,>,g Hd �t n••:relmaro; Ci- -: +4't. ric9 t a c:,•.r 'rLl5F�'PPt 7;1 FM,!•iz t j ae u'uRh 1`r L,„: 9+� :,•N{�T7,r,47 1:- n ��- ���\•,.,1 .! ' Z"L��� 4.r...� /•kr••£ A ,' t?may}dg v,> 4 - ♦;a �,n•s• xL G'� �1�y ' t`i-f}j� �f.,',1-41.s‘;,...,ai, •t-1 I I,r. r:. , t� =.e>svia' t ,nap/��Jry/(moo J} N r ,, iL�t + �, .,, : �+ r : <i„ ` tj^�} k V X DS{ l 4 3 ' ,,� le:', g i'[, tI,`1 a Aa a. a: � 1711:.: �0.1: r' ',^ f r 8 ♦i+.I.v.''qrl. '� `�L&4L Tc4i :,Crr-w. .,, , ._ � ...a .lil4f�.i��:tLC,� fv..-.,; tY.t > ,11Lp !! ''' .},,:..Pin i�%` ({(,,y,'S!`. 1 r ri / , 1t .! 1.,:..aF5i SW BONIN L"-) I ItA. - ��A!:ttW- n trti �W' la,, 1'' "'/. 1'� i f� 14 rn?'.' r1I'1 771$,+"}� }�'tj. )�r)y .i.' C«'I'�-t�Lll"t^d ,,'��S,r, t1 l5f7• r�^'' ..,. I� ,1t1 • f -- J4,--.1.4„,10,-p{, '^,i y} rZ.�.;...f' �,��,we r Gi't-6P?"'vy�+�y g(,I r< ']C77x -� e�.�,AuA',,,7'�{ r",fa 11 ';. x. '''''''-'*p';',4-1' t'2:h1 �•e� �' ' S.r. 4 '' M•` a ,,-gttel!:-.9. '•.>tta i if e1 tr'7 �'x L M w(X, 40 tx tli,a '. 3., >�P UNG,� LN S+i f' ..•m slln,,.eTv99W 1 . rc,ri tlG�1 s I,i+t, K{r� ' r:-;,!!i,111,:-WP::' a �f,. j ] r71 • f ! G I/ � ,a r r ?0E.f KI �� � � Sw j ,1 t r .+e 4 t�I ?a�F-, s J. 3 e t.. rh Lii,r:,,:,,,,t.phill..:1:,....,,h,:::1.14--st,;:'-� z r Tr _ ra.5..;;i R e t,. !iye �, a ! 'J Sdj`'' , j r }' 1 z t.f y s �i u,v. ' M1p xl c o i, � , 1 t(El r r t' -C�t r[t � 4�'+� SM �iJ�xrv-.3• 1'A'l '-r ri . .,, r ' ? '7 r l •nev`"s ' w161 �;',Y'i A,y Yom., , , 9' A> �p1'ry rx Z /'\ :IPt r 7 Tli� Ai$INRESPFAR'^� �3, �� \.1 I I 1 .+�.•:�7�1�YSt.YSa�.i....:a�,.�,�J. ,M�Y'th,..s�f7t71i'Y'��r -,M �� Yr.-�.,_ n F-tL/L+»5.•.J�i.4. ■u EtS•9r - .h..4 T. .... E �.:.�' ..,. ,,.3.e1.�:: f Y R n ^^x^Ta T, WI,q 0 , R ,i Z 1•.1"- IBS r7 , -3 f J -,*: �"r g • •, R re- "(,�'7cat,:/r• -v .t,sr e 'S fig, • .�i 1�;�„ �4,,, 'f*F3'. 1P iT�Y.1 r. :p1 ,1 s*4•t` '4 t t 7,rCreN, s:M. �� ��9 ` tiff P 43.. .�, ,� 4 y, � 1 3 ,.Y I•ao r?i y6 .- Rti.A, ]L r t h s tj��aw, y; .i :J�, _ "<' 4 °•,r <,.,,•% �' u'71' _ iN., ..r.:r :r:•r• ��•.,,,, E a i. A ',”! .,L) r,} S'T R' t• a 1 { ��t. Y k I tr .5, CrFT'. A ,.�'�'-^;1r'J ;tj u1• A .w ro� 1 i:, �>CrA].l d�l�>.'�iE'��LRr1..�.��s1 'it�'4 t��'� �� ;,• '2'� �ie�.'!�'sa?' .i'Ta�� 1 r+•,a;z � J ' . 't, •• ��UN Y I'q.`� ..�, '�i `�a��`:t'"s,fri !SF"k'1F'�!"'�R j'1'. � ' f f ? `T' J P;oTL� .�"� ` �i�j':^'i '. -t. d' 1`ft,:J' 1 +Y. Yn s i, n1- r . , �,7w•`},.'vem r1 � 1 fw ! �A�:...,-„t' � ' f '�1 1 0 t n' , r' ,/4 I � �i 1�L-i�F f � � `.;�.y`♦ �e.� �,i S�'eP f.' . S. 1. ,� ,,. �E3C "„ � ` ,.fi rr{;', � tl Y:r f't. ..1ivG L...,;�W'��,. 1,•.: jf.'» ii 61 :- �� r 9 ..- •• ., s. 41` : 6. k,,-' w:� ,„ , ,. it s. .+1,,,tg, _tom' . 4`+ +,s �1:•i„ �+ , , , : j t t•_ ,m,. ,71<.ix,YAr M tlar ',4,ucF r, �, •t .. � 4 ir, �t ufc��F• 4„ � ,�fF •�, r: t RR] ;r Fanno Creek Trail Permit •pi r,y.•,, ,�`�rf*Pkr j ,q L^ 4�� C [ 1,�Lyt ,ftq t Y. (t ±] �" Sir1)J r u.. �y\ t' el _ , ROM ST II .4,. f,i; t,,,:„,,,,,,,...,�,.,� xS,'•' h. 'Y' _,)t+ `j dr:''-N '"' ,�tlS.,+I fnj ll'`' S!,t x'^''Y�•,i. '•,rJ3• I'� ;PZ Z ! rt . Sheet I.. of 9 11/98 _ "x° �r, ,,DURHAM' Sheet 1 . Trail Location Map -3y1.. �t � K� ■�, _ - _ � �, tn+.w :mwt^ tt' c'1 >•4 4 ' ,_ F�f r'I 3 ,. `,( t 1 7,16.).,.....41^-43,,.44,‘,,,„,. Y smuE/I :t,, -- n// l E�+1.n e.. `e.tiiSlt /Sr .t '. ... :t i k4I .d i/ ut.m��.20a021:3PZIIT� uar.s�Fif®® I��irriu�i .��iFlt�iGlaL 685 3£nire39tti�s�G 1490 ∎ISCIVNl►a�a,3AEL��®I®i�ri�a�Tr��--as r�vl!��5 CCC MAD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community(Development Shaping Better Community DATE: May 20,1999 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts,Associate Planner Phone: [503)639-4111/Fax: [503)684-1291 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT[CPA]1009 00001/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLR]1000-00003 ➢ FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT < The City of Tigard is requesting to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources overlay from 0.30 acres of wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, to allow construction of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Trail. Sensitive lands approval is also requested for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. LOCATION: 1S134 AND 2S102; Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over Summer Creek); Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Segment 3: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a bridge over Fanno Creek); Segment 4: Grant Avenue to Main Street along Fanno Creek; and Segment 5: Main Street South (has a bridge over Fanno Creek). ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map, Applicant's Statement and Related Information for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: JUNE 3,1999. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact ' of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ti ('lease provide the foffowing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: Phone Number[sl: I CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 1_. • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS ' -- :,,,c,,,tom. �- s .r -•,.a^,� V ''Z•:7,41J ,i q' 44•° ,;:i0--[cm ecig[�a`[sI w] {` `' :> CIflZEN'INVOLVEM.ENTTEAMS .1(; ®Place for reviewI UbraryCRBoo (sl ;, s FILE NO[S).: C �(- (`i"W003 FILE NAMEISI: .. . .rca(o c. c-ce , � ! �O�' ,, , f;;:, ., .. . ., s,•;e,,. s .' „.iQ 4T �YLSS= ,/,,,s- ,,,,4:;,,, s ,_. , „.:N:-: .<,. _-_ °b Z: : �., LONG RANGE PLANNING/Nadine Smith,snpem.. _COMMUNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./DNpmt.sva.Technicians /POLICE DEPTJJim Wolf,Crime Prevention orroer _BUILDING DIVJDavid Scott,a,uind orr,cn ENGINEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,olpmet.Review Engineer,L WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,utimes Manager _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,c.t r OPERATIONS DEPTJJohn Roy,Property Manager _OTHER ... ;a4 .. 5.: T ;;,,.. . :;"•. . �-• =; . .. x ASPECIAL.DISTRIC.TS-k4 ,4. ..i ,� .� %,; .., k4 A �� 4? ... TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*_TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* _TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT*/NIFIED SWRGE.AGENCY Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Office Julia Huffman/SWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N.First Street Beaverton,OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 " --.' rA• ; .,:*:4"4: •a - = : : ... FLOC. ,.,„o;STATE IURISDICTIONS s, a w°: ', . ik.A, , m: t, ,.. .4 _CITY OF BEAVERTON* _CITY OF TUALATIN * ZOR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE /OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street,NE _Mike Matteucci,Neignbrnd.Coors. PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 Beaverton,OR 97076 _OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. ,/METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street,NE _CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 PO Box 23483 _ ZUS ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97281-3483 Paulette Allen,Growth Management Coordinator ••-.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERVV DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue . ,tMel Huie,Greenspaces Coordinator(CPA's/ZOA's) 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 200/ PO Box 2946 _CITY OF KING CITY* - -m,OR 97301- •G Portland,OR 97208-2946 City Manager _METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION 15300 SW 116th Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street _OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODD ) _WASHINGTON COUNTY King City,OR 97224 Building#16,Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of.Land Use&Trans. Portland,OR 97232-2109 Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director _OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Bonneville Power Administration _Brent Curtis(cPA•s) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera _ODOT,REGION 1 * _Scott King(CPA's) PO Box 3621 Sonya Kazen,ovlpmt.Rev.Coord. _Mike Borreson(Engineer) _CITY OF PORTLAND 'Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders. _Jim Tice(lGA•s) David Knowles,Planning Bureau Dir. Portland,OR 97209-4037 Tom Harry(Current Pl.Apps.) Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 _OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY _Phil Healy(Current Pl.Apps.) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue 811 SW Sixth Avenue _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* _Sr.Cartographer tcPAacuiMS 14 Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,Permit Specialist 5440 SW Westgate Drive,Suite 350 Qom/ ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A Portland,OR 97221-2414 K�1 Right-of-Way Section(vacatons) ` Rick Reeves t c� St�N � oe 123 NW Flanders . Portland,OR 97209-4037 :;•A i a , s ,,5w�.. " % :kt UTITP ROVIDERS;AND SPECIAL AGENCIES, W4% A '.`X,719. :fr;._ ,m# _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE R/R,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Robert I.Melbo,President&General Manager 110 W.10th Avenue Albany,OR 97321 —SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Pat McGann Michael Kiser,Project Planner 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court 710 NE Holladay Street Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 • _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _GENERAL TELEPHONE } _ US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer Elaine Self,Engineering Patty Stambaugh,Engineering 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue MC: OR03O546 8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Rm 11( Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Tigard,OR 97281-3416 Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _TCI CABLE(Apps.E.olHatVN.of 99W) Marsha Butler,Administrative-Offices Joy-Gay Pahl,Demographs&Planning Dept. Diana Carpenter 13137 SW Pacific Highway 16550 SW Merlo Road 3500 SW Bond Street Tigard,OR 97223 • Beaverton,OR 97006 Portland,OR 97232 * -INOICATBS AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IF WITHIN SOO. OF TAX iUBJBCT PAOPBAVY FOS A14P/A!L CITY PROJECTS. IPROJBCT PLAMNLR Is&UPONfMBLL FOR INDICATING PARTICS TO NOTIFY/ h:\pathAmastersVtcnotice.mst 22-Apr-99 A CITY OF TIGARD Community(DeveCopment ShapingA'Better Community - LA N D U SE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION DE SC RIPTION , .: . - " 120 DAYS = N/A FILE NOS.: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ICPAI 1999-00001 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW[SLR]1999-00003 FILE TITLE: FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER(S): Various Owners Duane Roberts, Project Manager (List available upon request) 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 x347 . REQUEST: The City of Tigard is requesting to amend the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map to remove the water resources overlay from 0.30 acres of wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, to allow construction of the multi-modal Fanno Creek Trail. Sensitive lands approval is also requested for trail construction within the 100-year floodplain and wetlands. LOCATION: 1S134 AND 2S102; Segment 1: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (has a bridge over Summer Creek); Segment 2: Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Segment 3: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue (has a bridge over Fanno Creek); Segment 4: Grant Avenue to Main Street along Fanno Creek; and Segment 5: Main Street South (has a bridge over Fanno Creek). ZONE: N/A APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.390, 18.775 and 18.797; and Metro Title 3. CIT AREA: S, W, C.& E CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: COMMENTS SENT: DUE: ❑ STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: ❑ HEARINGS OFFICER IMONJ DATE OF HEARING: . TIME:1:00 PM © PLANNING COMMISSION MOW DATE OF HEARING: JUNE 7,1999 TIME:1:30PM © CITY COUNCIL [TUESJ DATE OF HEARING: JUNE 22,1999 TIME:1:30PM COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION © VICINITY MAP © LANDSCAPING PLAN © NARRATIVE © SITE PLAN ❑ ARCHITECTURAL PLAN ❑ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ❑ ARBORIST REPORT © TREE PLAN STAFF CONTACT: Mark 1.Roberts,Associate Planner 15031639-4111 ext. 315 CPA 1999-00001/SLR 1999-00003 FANNO CREEK TRAIL ALIGNMENT LAND USE PROPOSAL I 0 A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT �V11 TYPE IV APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 PRE-APP. HELD WITH: GENERAL INFORMATION DATE OF PRE-APP.: Property Address/Location(s): Fanno Creek greenway FOR STAFF USE ONLY corridor from Tiedeman to Ash Ave. Tax Map &Tax Lot#(s): see attached Case No.(s): Other Case No.(s): Site Size(s): 6,068 lineal feet of path Receipt No.: Application Accepted By: Property Owner/Deed Holder*(s): see attached Date: Address: Phone: City: Zip: Date Determined To Be Complete: Applicant*: Address: Phone: Comp Plan/Zone Designation: City: Zip: • * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the CIT Area: applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession Rev.11/26/98 is\curpin\masters\cpa.doc with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written • authorization with this application. REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS PROPOSAL SUMMARY ✓ Application Elements Submitted: The owners of record of the subject property request a Application Form Comprehensive Plan Amendment (if applicable)from: ❑ App to . ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization OR...The applicant requests an amendment to the following sections ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed of the Comprehensive Plan or Community Development Code ❑ Site/Plot Plan (please be specific): (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Amend the comp plan map to remove the water ❑ Site/Plot Plan (reduced 81/2"x 11") resources overlay from 0.30 acres of ❑ Applicant's Statement wetland, as justified by an ESEE analysis, (#of copies based on pre-app check list) to allow construction of the mu_ lti—modal ❑ 2 Sets of Pre-Addressed/Pre-Stamped Fanno Creek Trail. Legal Size Envelopes ❑ Filing Fee $4,015.00 (Map,Text,or Both) 1 I List any VARIANCE OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: Sensitive lands approval for trail construction within the 100—year floodplain. Title 3: Water quality, flood management and Fish & Wildlife Conservation approval for a conditional use in the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay zone. APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this / C2 day of _A-Z 7 , 19 Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 • -• J CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Mark Roberts FROM: Duane Roberts DATE: 5/10/99 SUBJECT: Fanno Creek Trail Project Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA 99-00001), Sensitive Lands (SLR 99-00003), and Title 3 Reviews Enclosed herein, I believe, is all the necessary submittal information relative to the above- referenced land use application. Please advise me should any required information not be included in the submittal. Any overlooked information will be provided ASAP. The contributors to this application package include: Vannie Nguyen, P.E., City of Tigard Duane Roberts, AICP, City of Tigard Mirth Walker, PWS, Fishman Environmental Services Joe Perceival, ASLA, Perceival Associates With regard to the ownership or control of land within the project area, the following information is provided: Of the fifteen parcels within the project boundary, the City owns or has obtained access easements on nine. Land purchase and access deals on the six remaining parcels are pending. Should any of these deals fail to be realized, the City has the legal authority under state statute to acquire the needed right-of-way through condemnation. The public involvement program associated with this proposal included area-wide informational mailings and two public outreach meetings, each attended by approximately fifty Tigard residents and land owners, as part of the development of the 1997 Fanno Creek Trail Alignment study. The public involvement process has also included numerous public meetings and two formal public hearings related to the preparation of the1999 Tigard Park and Open Space Master Plan, which identifies the trail segments in question as priority park improvement needs. Lastly, the adopted 1998-1999 and proposed 1999-2000 Capital Improvement Plans, both of which provide funding for the projects under discussion, included public involvement components. To recapitulate briefly, the reason Title 3 applies to this project is as follows: In mid-1998, the Metro Council adopted performance standards for the protection of streams, wetlands, and floodplains, • • called Title 3 of the Functional Plan. Tigard and the other jurisdictions within Metro are required to amend their comprehensive plans and develop codes to address these new standards by January 1, 2000. In addition to Title 3 itself, Metro also has adopted a model ordinance that provides approved examples of provisions that can be used by jurisdictions_to comply with Title 3 performance standards. Although the City and most other jurisdiction within the Metro area have not as yet adopted Title 3 compliance packages, the Metro attorney has determined that local comprehensive plan amendments related to water quality and flood management must comply withTitle 3 as it stands during the period before adoption. Since only the model ordinance, and not Title 3, contains standards for pathways, these are followed in this application in order to deal with the question of the present proposal's consistency with Title 3. Please note that Larry French of DLCDC (503-373-0050, x 283) has reviewed the proposal and has informed the City that his department has chosen to not submit comments. A letter of confirmation for the project file has been requested. Please note also that a project site visit by Metro officials is scheduled for May 21, 1999, in conjunction with this agency's review of the project. Enclosures: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Applicant's narrative Site Map Deeds and Easement records Design drawings (6 sheets) Joint Corps and DSL Fill and Removal Permit Application DSL Removal/Fill Permit Memo from Vannie Nguyen, P.E. addressing flood impacts Natural area restoration plan (2 sheets) Title 3 and Model Ordinance City Forested Natural Areas Inventory and Assessment City Local Wetlands Inventory and.Wetlands Functional Values Assessment Fanno Creek Trail Study • • • i :cow, r CITY OF TIGARD Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Phone 503-639-4171 Fax: 503-684-7297 TO: Whom It May Concern FROM: Vannie Nguyen, P.E. !1 DATE: May 12, 1999 • SUBJECT: Fanno Creek Trails This is to certify that constructions of the Fanno Creek trails will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge and will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood. • • • OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN TRAIL ALIGNMENT BY TAX LOT- Tax lots listed in geographical order beginning with the most northerly property • /1S1 34DD 100 Tigard-Tualatin School District District#23-J 13137 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, OR 97223 J 2S 1 3AA 101 Tigard-Tualatin School District 2S1 2BB 600 Metro Regional Parks and Greenspaces 600 NE Grand Ave. Portland, OR 97232-2736 2S1 2BB 832 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97009 2S1 2BA 300 Wilshire Real Estate Partnership 1776 Madison St. Portland, OR 97205 2S1 2BA 2000 Ronald and Gayle Wicks 12345 SW Grant Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 2S1 2BA 1501 City of Tigard 2S1 2BA 1400 Robert Ball 2255 NW Johnson Ste#1 Portland, OR 97210 2S1 2AC 700 Dolan& Co. LLC By Florence T. Dolan 4025 SE Brooklyn Portland, OR 97202 • • • 2S1 2AC 200 Page Stevens 9180 SW Burnham Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 2S 1 2AC 1101 Dave& Christine Hammon 3015 SW 116th Ave Beaverton, OR 97005 2S1 2AC 1100 Otto Sorg By First Interstate Bank Trust Real Estate T-12 PO Box 2971 Portland, OR 97208 2S1 2AC 204 City of Tigard 2S1 2DB 500 City of Tigard i/Irpn/dr/trail.tx FtS7•1-34DD-, } 1S 1 34DD • w., aw° q wa .4, , .•e : .a ti r �mr 2>r ,I , 1 2000 gg ° M? 2 x i 't .a.a.wa •• .,,smooL. ,. 6-56.61L1 60, i ►w,a W / F���y/" �M*# .,'.'� . .., mmin ,•ioim � u�. • 1..01 it t,00-a 4y'"' 54.''..' /d' ,/.1 'IN • asp 1700'•it. e I .hk� '-• 3, 2200 aril•• ." w.'P• 100 V 103 1 ^•yip 'tiff ''''' C 9 ..... ' d ,w1K 217K !I \ n 8 a. WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON W ?,•"� ;` 17 AC 3 V`' SE7/4SE7/4SECTION34T1SR1WW.M. 1.71 AC 102 ---- � e' a �r rr -.•...,..,..„,,<.\., " a .00 a 10, / 32 i0 i♦<♦ii♦?♦i ♦tii•c♦i c �♦+♦� •,?'.2'TMI'=., •' ro.wi iR A. III X-, ��I♦(��li.:1:+;.:4�♦r►1{i/�►~♦'►�♦/�♦� :; aaw a ,��� iii�i��i v��r mk"."" - e,w•a wa.n T. ♦�i� a1!����ti��♦♦i�Cc��P X996► R SW ° t / .��r_J_�•(04:ii4!i_��.; 0 MX Y TIGARD STREET p (CR 916) I �♦i'i♦+ ►i+�i�i�+i�♦:irr• PO►�♦♦ ♦♦l ► •♦i �t 23-74 I 1- r �.. Y- q, .1 AC ',.#::(04Don .4.4.4 143/- .71 A- Q a 1100 1 .;`. --alta .--,..7.71110. ..,,,,.• .,.,.. ,:,,,,,:;,..,,,„:„....,. 1111 8 1300 E�(.,�-,• M �K #L A a4Z ::',C,4'!:MCI I i 1 1 1 '� Canc 0iO For:19131DD • 3 ,600 200.500.626. AIK iir t 1600 11 1.,.K I e;'•. `.O Ass®s$mrl®ov4 �, ,700 I1 .CCARTOGRAPHY't,` w.>, 11 • x ® t I 0 P1 PLOT DATE i June 18,1998 E too CO FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES t0"` ONLY-DO NOT RELY ON FOR OTHER USE f + w„ _ .w.wl .// TIGARD 1 S 1 34DD 1S 1 34DD NE 1/4 NE1/4 SECTION 3 T2S R I W W.M. .71-7-t2, rfiFtiiit7"..74 (-v . . SEE MAP WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON IS 1 340C eee...... i'ns i SEE MAP H 61.11r61.0 6'7. SCALE 1'210 CV IS 1 3400 r___,,,,,„„____„,„.......in..,.... ,-„,....;. "COO. 6 GP lel 1 s....• -F ••••Ise. C\I I 1 A44.S KTHEThNE “...,.....” Ator-77-1) I ■ ta ....Amu, 34 35 '...•-••\ .6 5'WOOL DISTRICT . 3.44"..c. , PAI TWILL"Of.RION I 1t N. ,. . 1 , \ I I , 3 2 . I / ....' N 0 'R -r H w ii rt NORTH '..\ I I ' ..-.. I o''7— 'I.us ..;p1. n 7 g TioAroviLL.E: TIGARDVILL E.' 2 j_\DDiTioN .- . . % - AMENDED A D D 1 -r I 0 N ,...:•,:: :::.:: --- "-r. ....-/ .- .•• .... ....Mt. 66. • 4 1 SCO CI • . t ' • I I ' ...: 11 1• • , o•• 2000 2100 2200 2300 2600 2700 •21100 ••4900 00111T • 23-74 !! t I , :- 2 :1; 1. • A ;• V 4 r_.. 41 .F. , •11. • . A l .C. ... $ 5 ,.. , •• 9 0 3000 In t e I • 4 3 S.W, . ••• lo 11 S' _ • ! , /06 4'1 ta°, , 4...., 6 IG..,•;,* 113100 1,•t: •• N I I i 1'.14400 6 ‘ % • -3 24 1 g'•1000'• N. A Wt. 2•: .. • w t• *i . '1,01..t".IS •••••. ' * u , " At CLYDESDALE pt. 07:0,“ .: 2 002 . )14.,, ..■,,' % 0.) . . !35;0 4k ,....' s'a°, c : I I ! An.6 3900 s ,o4,3..3,00 2 • ; • to ' . . Z 4'.*4.2CO 4100 N- '4.„. t •to t •4, 3400 3300 *-• • 1 w • 3700 I. a .2iftil ---''' 1 I . Is 22 1 21 1, 3800 .. • $• . 14 , 13 $ 20 17 a It. 301 . 3•009• ,i • In 1.,. • to .••••• r I. t. , .. • .. •• •• ...vet 011•• 11 1 I. I I* • ,.190S ... .I C A • " 1710" 1911 1912 0 Ing 10 NW E4. 1 • 3• -. i i lit .•.• I ,• • r .. cc z - le I. .7 . • ,. I - • it .1. 4.1.......A.910...1.4....f.•••;:makimio,......i.,f...........i.F.Trittremw.•.44t,rw ' . x S.W. JOHNSON. STREET' - 0 r•0 ii..... ,n MIN I II S. TO 70 i70 .2 SOL 1900... 1001 1002 110 0 1500 1100 MO 1702 170e 1904 • 1916 ..*R.. .••■,. •••... •••••. , .... 1 — I • 4• A L 2. ! ? AM ito•. . 0 .44 NI ! F.1 14 1 T. ...-—-,.—-_.„.—C 1903 1902 • 1901 - 23 O; a 4 i $ •• E C H 0 HE10H TS'' 23-78 13 g e 1917 • • . $1: •. 6 .1 1900 T ',N.."• H.... ...._.. ••••• ••••• ■se• t ...""Sit.,.... •i • • ■ , 23 4 • too 802 : :; 1401 1400 C IV tun .e 6 ADr. 5 4 .4. 3 leao. to s. 47..:2 •,.. -.. .. 3 .-"zz--7.-----, ... lttMeler.„. ' 6.1671111•••• to4 an tow ..”. ..7.64 • • Is. 1200 BOO , 4 i .... .. me,31 ■34 , ...• ' \ . ••••:. \ • g tt t II.• I201 0 ....t • 1 ..... i .. •, I 1 : .J.• • ...... : 'I. ............... , ...., ..: .8 • FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES WILY u 4. --._ "r431.•• tow nee I.o.t: I 00 NOT RELY OM FOR ANY OVIER USE 111 ••■ t 1 k • i di A)411N,000000...............ffeRoe 43? . . TIGARI ii SEE MAP 24 I 340 0 I u) 2$ I 3AA • • • WASHINGTON COUN7 uncnun _eef MA► .1'.1 3600 NW V4NWW4 SECTI0N 2 T2S RIW W.M. STALE I" loo' N _ S.W. r KATHERINE ' 1 ', STREET 2 , •••• 2 Y a 2S sI y2,BB?•".To 4 !S uo•F W 1 91/Aa 112, .14 ° 100 / J g . ' 1 11 ; TI l• / I N G R E E N B U R G • u :/: yur... 2 si , T •• ; .i..1 K 'A° R ! a •\ 17 14 i 15 y,10. ►cr.tiao ; `` // 3 HR JCMTS "": :" ! a e :I pric,, U R • . - ' 22—� 11+� p • . A •N o 1 T 1 O N 1 1 1 5,/407 � 1 I S `! ° • 7 FOR ASSESSMENT _ ..«.. ' .«.• I e•-•1,i « ( . / ^"'1{�• 'ti'e. PURPOSES ONLY re... 1 ,',• r'..n. ' DO NOT RELY ON 396 FOR ANY OTHER USE Stole \ N •••p R T H T 1 G A R I��;,Y 1 L L E ��.. 23 74 ••r'" • 191. (..._....„.5:'',827 1, a xe CLt, , � . A D D 1 _1- 1 O N . .:T» ..•. /6 ers ;.t� •/ 1 $Fe00\ S` 7Es , . "•.e'•:• 11 10 •9 14 ' Wy' / MAP P A/ �R 13 l 06 1 2 S 1 !AA i y •- 0 5 ,Sd1 A M E ■ sD Lp / / • ,.. ; `x.1.>a " \•� • SI SEE MAP e, r e ' ncx Y • r h / e � / °2e 022 • . ` / . 131 Y" L S 1321 S b2 1. 1 I' / .+�•'a .y v .01 • u+• 94j...e .. Q 002 I •-•.4..,d X20 ',O•.11, t'.,, "` 0 e1z a0 , M ,p e19/ J a 13 A e10 �F 'I •., 4.e S 2 1309 4,,,,,, T 3 1200'4• �� •P'..... •• r .., "t .K Ae /30j '6' s � . eoe % m 1301 3 •.,. . •:°° VTRF 'h\\ ' 0071 ..4/,122 ., ' •„ '".. 19 .y^o ' ' re° ••003 /,T0 /:'•�.'°o . 3 .A •.'`y.• ••'+ 's `\\`•,._ SEE MAP ' ''• r*. 231 2 S .•• 17 • . • }f SEE MAP 2S 1 290 q4.4,7„ / ...`' y.4. TIGARD 2SI2BB • (-4 �E� foo••NORTH� ,�) ''''ZSr{BA N$ TLS cow WM, .441(49.1.4;�0 37lOARDVIL Q NE�/4 «� p NTf 0N£00N yit NAF_1e 1 Stitt ^ � $"•••••aO•y .'. .<-f��y7A:aNINSf�CWI^.100. sot Toy So 1 S k, N Ty Cp �+' .,.. .. 1 i tr►M ;f ;: "lcE R MAI RC�•dj 1 (S.q.,11 /.•,• , S • 1 /1 4�q00 .. FIN w'4 !F C S 1 v :`,ro•` em A.n.1 ,.,,.• ,>.. _ t t O •l : fir M. �.—r '22 1\1 /., R : t , >M r= • r.4 6tA ± 1: C.w.Y0 2 . y �" It •1�. � t000 F L! , 7 • . X1,1 t MO, <. :, 57 SEE NAF /� f 7' •. YS 1 YBB 7j' ! A F '. tf' i,/ 4 u F 5 a?n \•r r BEt NAF I y.^' t300 •,4.•:„.. LfrK Q^ r•e .< 70••..^ FOP ABEESSIS W /�G; f.to•r , M•i. WRY Y,,,,, •'� f• !/ t200 . 45 do-'o' ;14 � _rr l Y aTNER USE.D SW I ^J • t t,M. —7� `.150z + r 100 a 23 a� 73 1 7 +'\V 0 A z t p1 M• •4•IGiM..PN �... 1 • 17 w iaa ^ La.. 13 ao�M A �K r•�K , .��,.//• •.j Y1a1 M `^20 •• 1',•,` ! • ♦ V 4 a .D �• 5 .' 1t / ,,,, \.t •.yr^ f • **.. ..0 .... :,.1 .%SEE NAF •;.iK• tw 3 OZ` �.r.(' �w 53 / M••f. Isod /� l�p\■k SEE. NAF • .. 71GARD xslteo ..; .,� / 2S 1 2 BA /11 • N. x NW 1/4 SE 1/4 SECTION 2 T2S R I W W.M. 2S 1 208 p ' As ! WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON tif, H ��Q((/4 SCALE 1'•100 °ZK 4116 N S T I e ,Anw•w•..:., SEE MAP ;/dAfIG ,�`\ rb / e. ii e..wa 23 1!AC ,I SEE MAP i 4. 0 i% 25 1 2AD .1".r + e es • • ° 8 l`y 8 ) ZN4.. +• Py _.,r) !01 / • 4� R74 AG e F/ J +P+d SEE NAP `% / 29126. B U R N }- A )`a .; 7 R A T S a`� I 4, .1000 v. .• 1 • 4 O w M +� .* I 9EF MAP o 4y I 41110;\ 04 \ . , ..^ 4.1i 0'700 2 V ./..C• 41:1;0.T� �•.p. .... 4 -- • \*. +A.,,c.,' •1• / I MR ASSESSMENT 1� 5201 iQ'% IIM Ati. 'I PURPOSE!ONLY II '1{. 206 / /1�_�A c/rr rlaw I Obi DO NOT RELY ON "'ISO! - ♦ `A1 - ./C47 204 G T POP ANY OTHER USE liiii; M -1 .. / il `I GY •lN• 17 111#`�'•�+7�D:. / .•8 -,4.. 9 ,T300+ / I 2401 'V +q,Fi� �'ax d 2100 2 74„... 'A00 NA-� , ,,i 1W0'. iinu • U SI •-+" 2e llOO�r!' ! SEE MAP , Ea 10 t 23 1 2CA ■ 04900 Q 3403, f 4 ig- • O 26 • II N ..iIa5°° y4600 . 'f F • . •� fe 71 i 25 1-1 • (444 .;(< P mt.;It/ • u s 4700 "� '•w✓" '1`e 8700 ` t• 0eoor Q '/ 2 EX 604 ".. " la q 47 W m �••G e4 + A6800 V ECM n kit nKJ ' 45 •.rear. Seoo y [ HO' 6400 +°s7oo yi as o `$ 002 603 601 8300 •`A• N JIAC .iaC .JlC �' !EE MAP A ` 6100 6200 X00 M r' W 23 1200 Min,1 e00p 4117E 42 +, C MA 0 5 3 a•' 07 4 "/ ' ae B a9 \J 4a .. 1_ N fS 42000 , 41 b 9i 8 L i y TIGARD LW to .A„ a I if ✓• "�4 w 2S 1 209 /414* � 44 L SEI MAP 29 1 20C I 11 u • N S.W.I/4 NE 1/4 SECTION 2 T2S R I W W.M. mmyaomt ' �2AC-e 0 WA9NINGTON COUNTY OREGON !p,'4\ / SCALE I••100' .,/. +r' / ,"t . 3oO I N 'f TOO.) *, ``�� WA J 400 /��.. 900�.\•• A9A< ttA.. SEE MAP / • ?00 ` - - G/A 1 SEE MAP . 25 129A 23 1 2AS 100 / ',� "200 / .au a •eauaa A:7° ''t.9iAC veq.ia•.i,Na. F.A.N,AiMII '�1101's> ..e,.••e.Nagem,•�•. eek• ,d' -{ �� 201 \ y/ 202 \\ SEE MAP <1/4"/ , ,/' I..9sM \� 2 l.tsAe. 2E 1 2AD - k� /J_� �� \\\ B U Ft A M loo p1'- \ e. \ \ • �\ \ \ zol ~•\ ,.. f \ \\i > \> '�1 y? \• \ \ zoo •.0' •/ �� •1701 \ \ \ ' ,. / 1 le ��4 ilE .��' ,'' t\vet. T A C' T • gkg' •1703' 1700' 4 • / y .OWM .IS `4 \ 4S 40/ ~� 1900 \ ,f‘ / • f' I.B« \�,4' .0. \ /, \ Aq •tip \ / ..0.: \ +;P \ ..�•,,. / /' \ / 4• y/ / f, a92ENMAY �� • t / /• \ '..:` .s,./ %4, /*1i \ \ E SEE MAP e `" >! 251 2AD ,CS' as I.,Mill ` - / •ti P 9E[MAP N. 2S 12BD �`." C • 9 e ` FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY f• �\ • ,...1:o7 tft' DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE . ,t,%f \�.• Y /r` \. < \ ► .'.., SEE MAP \ \ 221 208 t.\ y4• . \ • TIGARD 2S I 2AC STATP OF OREGON } CouOaf Washington SS I, Jerry ft..-�a�n.ti �' �r of Assess- ment andfi.,-tin ... ^. 0 o County Clerk for 'r,�.4„ .7 !:f rtify that /r im the with' irr . 4,�‘; 1"1gg��� ceived and re.i.ra8• z �e•�ot�,1 1 ot8 .f said county. *- tt�_� " �za ;:. isrnilNl ��i I y� .04 cirector of _v' 11 ,, W re- ` • axation Ex- IQ• �"7• n Jerk &A.' Doc : 98123648 City of Tigard Rect: 219941 56.00 11/03/1998 11:43:31am 13125 SW Hall Tigard, OR 97223 COVER PAGE FOR RECORDING Name of Transaction: Easement - Bikeway & Pedestrian Way Re-recorded to correct missing legal and correct map, previously recorded as Document No. 98066323 Name of Person (Grantor, Grantee, etc.): Grantors - Tigard-Tualatin School District Grantee - City of Tigard The True Consideration for this conveyance is: - zero - NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT After recording, return to: City of Tigard Records Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 I . 5" • _ ST OF OREGON Rerecorded to correct *sing legal and } SS correct map, previously recorded,,;as County of Washington Document No. 98066323 Jerry nemit fire"or of Assess- men - d atLOn and E ffic,io County Clerk fo T -io t•a ,a!�ertify that the withityyi Iii e. r, r hJ w3sYreceived and re •rtle•,'�:::•�`•k • .'e ords>of said AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: county. * '�- '_r t�. * ) ti t " City of Tigard - Records A17%- °° �`•' c jfJ/J 13125 SW Hall Blvd. .f ;='* ector of Tigard, OR 97223 esoieliy'Cleka • , Ex- o1. Eg SEND ALL TAX STATEMENTS.TO: Doc 98066323 Rect: 211076 48. 00 NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT 06/22/1998 11 : 00: 51am EASEMENT FOR BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN WAY Tigard-Tualatin School District,hereinafter called the Grantors,grant and convey unto the City of Tigard a perpetual easement,thirty(30)feet wide encompassing a ten(10)foot wide trail,subject however to relocation or termination as hereinafter provided, over, across, and under the land and'real property described in the attached Exhibit "A" for a bicycle way and pedestrian way, which may be used by pedestrians and non- motorized mechanical means of transportation, such as bicycles and for no other purposes. The grantee shall have the right to place, construct, operate, replace, maintain, inspect, reconstruct, install necessary improvements, and in connection therewith may remove any trees, shrubs, or brush necessary or convenient to accomplish said purposes. Grantor expressly reserves for a period of fifteen(15)years commencing with the recording date hereof,the right to relocate the easement granted herein on the same legal parcel affected thereby, or to terminate the easement if Grantor and Grantee cannot agree on a relocation placement, which may be exercised by Grantor if it determines in good faith that the easement substantially obstructs Grantor's school construction and development plans for the legal parcel on which the easement shall exist. Exercise of the right of termination may only be exercised in the event reasonable efforts to relocate the easement are unsuccessful. Grantor shall give to Grantee not less than six(6)months prior notice of the exercise of its rights of relocation or termination. Grantor's rights of relocation and termination shall expire fifteen(15)years from the date of the recording of this instrument. Grantor shall not be responsible nor liable for any claims, costs, expenses or damage arising from the exercise of its rights of relocation or termination reserved herein; and Grantee agrees to bear all costs of relocation or removal of improvements in the event of such exercise. THE TRUE CONSIDERATION for this conveyance is $0.00 . However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD that this easement does not convey any right,title, or interest except those expressly stated in this easement, nor otherwise prevent Grantors from the full use and dominion thereover; provided, however, that such use shall not interfere with the uses and purposes of the intent of the easement except to the extent of exercise by Grantor of the rights of relocation and termination reserved by Grantor. IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, Grantee agrees that if said Grantee, its successors or assigns shall cause said easement to be vacated,the right of the Grantee in the above-described easement will be forfeited Page 1 EASEMENT FOP-BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN WAY a 5°. 2._ - .. - • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR 30.00 FOOT WIDE BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN WAY EASEMENT A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 34,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, AND THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 3,TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SW. TIEDEMAN AVENUE WHICH IS S 68° 44' 56" W A DISTANCE OF 539.07 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 3; THENCE ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF A 30.00 FOOT WIDE PATHWAY (15.00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF SAID CENTERLINE); THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 74.00 FEET, A DELTA OF 40°42'42" (A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 49° 20'27" W, 51.48 FEET), AND A LENGTH OF 52.58 FEET; THENCE N 23° 59' 06" W.A DISTANCE OF 88.78 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE OF CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 134.00 FEET, A DELTA OF 48°08'09"(A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 00°04' 59" E, 109.30 FEET), AND A LENGTH OF 112.58 FEET; THENCE N 24°09' 04"E A DISTANCE OF 143.48 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, A DELTA OF 23°49'05" (A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 12° 14'31" E, 20.64 FEET), AND A LENGTH OF 20.79 FEET; THENCE N 00° 19' 59" W A DISTANCE OF 631.15 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 175.00 FEET, A DELTA OF 96°22'02"(A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 48°31' 00" E, 260.85 FEET), AND A LENGTH OF 294.34 FEET; THENCE S 83°18' 00"E A DISTANCE OF 70.24 FEET TO A POINT OF A CURVE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET, A DELTA OF 30°51'34" (A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 81° 16'13"E, 53.21 FEET), AND A LENGTH OF 53.86; THENCE N 65° 50' 26" E A DISTANCE OF 94.75 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET, A DELTA OF 24°09'34"(A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 77°55' 13" E, 41.85 FEET), AND A LENGTH OF 42.17 FEET; THENCE N90°00' 00" E A DISTANCE OF 110.77 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE TO THE LEFT; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A DELTA OF 90°00'00" (A CHORD WHICH BEARS N 45°00'00" E, 35.36 FEET), AND A LENGTH OF 39.27; THENCE N 00° 00'00"E A DISTANCE OF 21.05 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY OF SW. TIGARD STREET. -5 , :) a :_-. • . • -ill , 1.^ . v e" i-0, II I 5/8" Iron Rod Edge of :"r '•i�(��5 f 1!N Track i r 1,4414-0o-.1, r ea Marked Fowler School Bollfietd TECH ENGR PLS 990 Running Field k .. 10 ` ', I Backstop Fowler School Limits of ' (20 Ash r' 0" Cedar Ball Field Lawn �' I I 5/8" Iron Rod 12+60 ' � � it 1 Iron R.�d 7 -�v. /zRPC Mark• I t :•�Y ! "DEA CONTROL. _ •q No Cap, Bent • PS 20 Ash/ �- •Ts "Fitnes7 1 RPConoRod Courses 7 ��' , Limits of / Workout /� 10.0 O QD / �!/� 14"AshyI ,�1:i/ l� Lawn Course Sian Limits of YVERA CONTROL" I Equipment \'bp I Exist Sign 4 Ash H/e� Agie .'Ashy/� �i ?*�• \ .;7 Miliglan''' - 1/ Iron Rod ..Ie �/ '// / T of Bonk �\w�t=�.��"' ����.. •• .. 18+00 •.lre 20+00 1 W/yRPC Marked p/I 'Jr oP z' _ - ?fy.� 'DEA CONTROL" 8" o Ie /(7 i A _ �0 0%1!/�0\ 10"M°ae�el/� Workout v -- s �MUs�4•� � 12 4.pl Equipment 5 �' \/1 -°9 8 ��\ t'c \ 16 •pl. 8^Ash Well••• =oundory 1 I �` y "Fitness sour '.n 1\ �e •if-1 ) �- sh A- ( ) > 2(2)1° (3)Ash 11.01111111111$1+ 1\y � 1 p + 12",8",8"As 1• 10"7 A (� `` I , Begin Construction ``.{. � .5 Cedar 3"Fir 7 12".12-Ash 12 Ash O 3 Ash (.� d _ -10"2 8"2 Ash een �`�? 1 I F V°tf 18"M,p �41' \ uQ}Fi e_ ;Fir o 12",10".10 Ash 8"(p)6(3)ASh 12%12-Ash ( ) ( ) Path Centerline 1. g•.s v • ..r Q (�"Fir td 12"Ash v a N 652146.1678 6 �O e •Fir,> m \\ I I ink Fen - ` + 1 sh 1,<j E 76Exist AC ! tum. ^°' \ vi Join Exist AC S 68'30'09 \ .� �� 36'WOlnut i �e449 `1. 2.�_.__ _ .:411� Wetland Boundary \ I 10+10.80 i e Const. Sted Posts - • ea. k.sPK Fit1.•"Cedar - - 90 ��- .5 C dory Curve Table 's/ 1.5"redo'T> G Curve No.Length (ft)Radius (it) Ddta Tangent/.j9 1.5"redo /-� 1 14.21 10.00 81-23-52 8.60 ROW , 0 12.34 10.00 70-42-13 7.09 ., €1 52.58 74.00 44-31-03 30.29 s �Top of Bonk -/ / \ O 112.58 134,00 48-08-09 59.85\ ` �- f 1 20.79 50.00 23-49-05 10.54\ O'1.5'Cedar I I // / \ 294.34 173.00 96-22-02 195.61 1, I\ U 53,86 100,00 30-51-34 27,60/ I \ \ Q 4217 100.00 24-09-34 21.40 1 •. I \ L\\ 39.27 25.00 90-00-00 25.00 \ 20.24 15.00 77-19-38 12.00 I m * `i 1ji 22.62 15.00 _ 86-23-10 14.08 I $ I Z • 8" Iron Rod I 4+ YPC Marked \ I \ PATHWAY 1 II., Scale 1• • 100' "'DEC PLS 2553" 1 q 1 5 14}•1B• 5/g IRON ROD I I 23• - - Sr 5• 2.S• V I /AL. CAP MARKED \ F' VAL. PLS 1945 / I 3' CLASS •C• AC FANNO9 1997" \ N1 8" Iron Rod \ YPC Marked "e;EC PLS 2553" \ / 2% �•--2%SLOPE r 2% t a I I •P Nail \ \ / �` 9f"' \\ \\\\ 1 B' OF 3/4-0 Aggregate shoulder `\W/gYCr Marked \ Mot - 3/4• - 0I NARROW "08EC PLS 2553" Bridg \ C • Marks BRIDGE- Sign . ROW I '�.�` 3 4"brass Cap ` �1;?ON , • - IA. ed CITY OF S 'VEY CONTROL-TIGARD \ \ \ i' 11' ' UN W UL TO DISTURB' N �` TYPICAL SECTION Al f:40 I 3 34 \\ \ ` 27+90.75 \• \ \ l lik..1, ; I I Canal Sted Posts - 2 ea TE M••, \ N 1� ► I End Construction 2 35 SECTION CORNER \� - \ I Ii 27+9'5.92 3 1 2" ALUMINUM CAP - •2. 875 i / ��IY r 7615728.1201 MARKED WASH. CO. �'D EA CONTROL" � - 1AP• :N 9W/iPC Marked ` -- T of Bank 1 UNLAWFUL i0 DISTURB' _ -- \ P BC 26 PGe6'I�, 4 '7nt 'PEED 35" • _�v7Yr \ \ p24 Existing Asphalt Trail LEGEND \ \ 41000; -�� \ \ \ ,p pi I/, anitor MH\` o 'f I` Rim=14.86 • NEW ■ \ \ P i�f I t S°rm MH g WETLAND TEST PLOT � ;r�I k/ '5/8 Iron PATHWAY Scale: 1" = 550• \ \ -="t► �UI,(y`�/8" Iron Rod 6 WETLAND FLAG BY OTHERS \ 11-1 l `SO - ▪ UTIUTY METER \ " mce I EXISTING - o UTIUTY MANHOLE Sign .O - 9 �:.TOP OF BANK O TREE - DECIDUOUS • RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE TREE - CONIFEROUS \ ► _ PROPERTY UNE • SIGN EASEMENT UNE ¢ POWER POLE \ \ • \ GUARDRAIL • \ MAILBOX \ -x-x-x- FENCE UNE • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ■ an il` EDGE OF WETLAND • CONTROL POINT(SET BY DEA) - - CURB LINE B CATCH BASIN A FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 2 CURB UNE W/YPC WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP 01 Nf � +i PM t� VANNIE T. NGUYEN TIGARD STREET TO TIEDEMAN AVENUE CENTERLINE W/RPC MATH RED PLASTIC CAP veaeen+u0 e �/w �^^^^"'^-^^•- AL. ALUMINUM a _ LLII)lu�II LAYOUT • .....f......BRUSH/TREE UNE -5- "' CITY OF TIGARD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT L THOMAS OREGON p FILE NO. 260 OWO NAME: SHEET Nus Ka aNAaLLr OML Issue srA� I awoelLCmeec��yw am psy eue-m1 ras 11,,U,a 11104-7817 aP98- N:\EN4\1998\FANN0\SRE L w+ z3 - After Recording Return Cot'bcorded Document to: (S 99583 ' City Recorder-City of Aoanington County 11S_ 13125 SW Hall Blvd.-Tigard,OR 97223 8- CORPORATION File No. DEDICATION DEED GREENWAY FANNO CREEK ASSOCIATES, an Oregon General Partnership do hereby dedicate to the public for Greenway purposes the real property described in Exhibit"A"located in Washington County, Oregon: To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the public forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantors hereby covenants that they are the owner in fee simple and the property is free of all liens and encumbrances, they have good and legal right to grant their right above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the property. The true consideration for this conveyance is $ 0.00 . However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand on this ..2 da , 19 33 Fanno Creek Associates , /— J an Oregon General Partnership Name of Corporation ignature tarry A. Cain, Vice President Gramor Development Northwest , Inc. Address Title 9895 SE Sunnyside Road, "P" Signature Clackamas, OR 97015 Tax Statement Address Title Same STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Washington ) Ci4CKc+ This instrument was acknowledged before me on LI y (o, 19 93 (date)by Nrr\, A. Cct n (name(s) of person(s)) as \h'e e Prec,i(ten# (type of authority,e.g.,officer,trustee,etc) of(,rumor C evetapment Nor-1-hvwib* (name of party on behalf of whom instrument was executed). =eta: ZirotO__. • eit41.1C/14--RA • L OMICIAL SEAL NICOLE M.MUSSER Not y s Signature 0 NOTARY PUBLIC-MOON My Commission Expires: S��—9.5-- COM COMMISSION NO.G�9 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR.MI5 Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this 1714 of ✓u I, , l9 95 . ‘</fZ////z--e-), City Engineer l � � ci . 1 �. . , ; //' f' I /- • ••• / • z • 0 // 0 c /5 V , 1. (0, 'C • • • ‘,,....\.._) SCALE 1" = 100' • • s C• • I 1r ;• y4), 1 0Q• // F UNE TABLE i �N, // LINE BEARING DISTANCE ^ I c? 1 N 47'42'20"W 3.71 , 0 2 N 1258'11"W 37.66 , // h' 3 N 052719'E 66.56 /j 4 N 6056'S3'E 74.92 �/� • 5 N 5339'28'E 20.95 C. • / .,• 8 N 62'0717'E 128.66 I - 8 7 N 0621.35'W 20.46 \ ./ N 333448W 45.70 / • /9 N 0673'10W 29.56 10 N 273604W 38.37 • /'W 11 N 37135'17 26.75 1 /' /� 12 N 02'46'16'W 56.02 / /4) S 13 S 881)7'20'W 152.92 j/ j� /Sr. 14 S 0175'03'E 58.56 1 (, ' �,. 15 S 85'26'56'W 8.10 I • POINT OF 16 N 313734'W 31.91 / l �'� '` BEGINNING 17 S 5853'18"W 121.27 • •1:s F 18 N 8838•42"W 6.11 ,/ 0 • ti•� 19 N 28'48'18"W 5.28 / 9 ' 20 N 10'55'00'W 21.63 / 'Aj • //' • /• •• • • / 1/j / • i • •• /• • j // • / / C_) 21 N 31'09'51-E 6.83 P • ct\ / 22 N 52-36'1YE 125.88 23 N 6470'3VE 46.97 24 N 35'4916'E 31.10 25 N 18'18'44"E 38.94 Gj� / �( 26 N N 48'44171 30.31/8'?3'43'E 28.46 ��0 �� Q'j/ O �� 42 4• / 28 N 01713'51'W 12.01 • �1 tic �� `V f'.� 29 N 4421'06'W 130.95 O �� j G GO 30 N 527723'W 41.99 • Q Q / j/ N ��A 31 N 74'58'07'W 1 3300 i!di. 4\,�`t� 34 33 N N 14�7'W 15.09 • '�O� /' // GO t. 35 N 29'06.49'E 11.93 ,p6 / 36 N 7729'08'E 160.97 y*0<k / 37 N 1020'55'E 12.90 / 38 N 0575'25'W 16.99 ( 4:1 j/. 39 N 13'0412N 32.24 40 N 3727'23'W 16.64 • '\O' . / i / j / • • I / • DRAWING TO ACCOMPANY EXHIBIT "A" surveyors LEGAL DESCRIPTION engineers planners VILLAGE AT FANNO CREEK PARK Incorporated FLOODPLAIN PARCEL 17355 S.W. 800NES FERRY ROAD JUNE 26, 1993 LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97035 (503)635-3618 FAX (503)635-5395 f t r� .J EXHIBIT"A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION FLOODPLAIN PARCEL - July 26, 1993 A parcel of land in the northeast one-quarter of Section 2, T.2S., R.1W.,W.M., City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon; said parcel being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the easterly corner of Tract 9 of the plat of"Burnham Tract", a duly recorded plat in ' said Washington County, said easterly corner being a point on the centerline of S.W. Ash Street; thence N.44°46'37"W., 30.02 feet to a point on the proposed northerly right-of-way of said street and the Point of Beginning of the herein described parcel; thence S.43°00'20"W. along said proposed northerly right-of-way,449.89 feet; thence leaving said right-of-way the following courses and distances, N.47°42'20"W., 3.71 feet; thence N.12°58'11"W., 37.66 feet; thence N.05°27'19"E., 66.56 feet; thence N.60°56'53"E., 74.92 feet; thence N.53°39'28"E., 20.95 feet; thence N.67°07'17"E., 128.66 feet; thence N.06°21'35"W., 20.46 feet; thence N.33°34'48"W., 45.70 feet; thence N.06°23'10"W., 29.56 feet; thence N. 27°36'04"W., 38.37 feet; thence N.37°05'17"W., 26.75 feet; thence N.02°46'16"W., 56.02 feet; thence S.88°07'20"W., 152.92 feet; thence S.01°25'03"E., 58.56 feet; thence S.85°26'56"W., 8.10 feet; thence N.31°37'34"W., 31.91 feet; thence S.58°53'18"W., 121.27 feet; thence N.88°38'42"W., 6.11 feet; thence N.28°48'18"W., 5.28 feet; thence N.10°55'00"W., 21.63 feet; thence N.31°09'51"E., 6.83 feet; thence N.52°36'19"E., 125.88 feet; thence N.64°20'35"E., 46.97 feet; thence N.35°49'16"E., 31.10 feet; thence N.18°18'44"E., 38.94 feet; thence N.48°44'27"E., 30.31 feet; thence N.18°23'43"E., 28.46 feet; thence N.01°26'S1"W., 12.01 feet; thence N.44°21'06"W., 130.95 feet; thence N.52°22'23"W., 41.99 feet; thence N.54°30'27"W., 49.33 feet; thence S.74°58'07"W., 122.30 feet; thence N.52°06'27"W., 18.09 feet; thence N.14°11'17"W., 15.09 feet; thence N.29°06'49"E., 11.93 feet; thence N.72°29'08"E., 160.97 feet; thence N.10°20'55"E., 12.90 feet;thence N.05°35'25"W., 16.99 feet; thence N.13°04'22"W., 32.24 feet; thence N.32°27'23"W., 16.64 feet; thence S.44°25'04"E., 73.59 feet; thence S.04°29'26"E., 62.06 feet; thence S.41°19'02"E., 232.07 feet; thence S.46°06'57"W., 3.00 feet; thence S.44°46'37"E., 309.45 feet to the Point of Beginning. Contains 80,576 square feet (1.850 acres), more or less. STATE OF OREGON } SS County of Washington I, Jerry H�anson Director of Assess- ment and,1' xa 6n and�'E9t O�ficdo County Clerk for at oifrity, to�erebytcertify that the with n'instr Tf.-, 'frog"w,as`received . and re a reed'' k;i.o *`-cords lo f said county. * ictsT4r r,er.,.* VII * tip ;" '�a�ti ' Jerryy Ra--an'YSon,,Director of v7:i nns AAA t Assessment aadzTaxation, Ex- Offic`,io;County``Clerk Doc : 93099583 Rect: 112436 23. 00 11/30/1993 11: 02: 27AM 4275\FLOODPLA.LGL 793.26 RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT T S OF OREGON 1 SS CITY HALL RECORDS DEPARTMEN ,y of Washington CITY OF TIGARD I Jerry 1 Assess- 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Y Lj�H�nQS1 Rio r of Assess- ment and eon an.d� ff o County Tigard,OR 97223 Clerk for• a 99rit Xd e elf 'Ertify that the with'tl�}�initr e �S� rttlnQw:s! ceived and rec rde it i To .-:ores of said INDIVIDUAL county. � `= b Y •�s A • .' File No. 250 • 1(eir, R:-H o�r„Director of I s eserelr'rht ari ffaxation, Ex- Offitti9- giitjF'Cierk Doc : 98080219. 1 Rect: 213294 26.00 5 EASEMENT 07/23/1998 09:54: 27am BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN WAY Page N. Stevens hereinafter called the Grantors, grant and convey unto the City of Tigard a perpetual easement over, across, and under the land and real property described in the attached Exhibit "A" for a bicycle way and pedestrian way, which may be used by pedestrians and non-motorized mechanical means of transportation, such as bicycles and for no other purposes. The Grantee shall have the right to place, construct, operate, replace, maintain, inspect, reconstruct, install necessary improvements, and in connection therewith may remove any trees,shrubs,or brush necessary or convenient to accomplish said purposes. THE TRUE CONSIDERATION for this conveyance is $ 0.00 . However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD that this easement does not convey any right, title, or interest except those expressly stated in this easement, nor otherwise prevent Grantors from the full use and dominion thereover; provided, however, that such use shall not interfere with the uses and purposes of the intent of the easement. IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, Grantee agrees that if said Grantee, its successors or assigns should cause said easement to be vacated, the right of the Grantee in the above-described easement will be forfeited and shall immediately revert to the Grantors,their successors,and assigns in the case of such event. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above-described and granted premises unto said Grantee, its successors, and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I hereunto set my hand on this 13th day of July 19 98 Signature - � Stevens Marine, 9180 SW Burnham Tax Statement Mailing Address Mailing Address Tigard, OR 97223 STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on 7-/3-9$ (date)by: iV ANG4) /1). E.43-15£7Z7- (name of person(s)). > •_: j ! OFFICIAL SEAL f NANCY �i IL.. i :�<V NOTARYP BLIC OREGON r No .�. Signature • COMMISSION NO.046590 r My Commission Expires: 8-098- 99 i MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG.2111999 4 • Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this 131:14 day of -�1 t y , 19 18 city Engineer NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT 1 --• 3 MENG\PUB-FORM\BIKPD-IN.DOT - LEGAL DESCRIPTION • FOR PATHWAY EASEMENT A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF THE SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 BURNHAM TRACT AS RECORDED IN BOOK 2 PAGE 29 OF THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SUBDIVISION RECORDS ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 BURNHAM TRACTS; THENCE N 63° 54' 00" E ALONG THE LINE BETWEEN LOTS 1 AND 2 A DISTANCE OF 85.00 FEET; THENCE S 04° 15' 00"E, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 42.00 FEET; THENCE S 63° 54' 00" W, PARALLEL.WITH THE EAST LINE OF LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 85.00 FEET; THENCE N 04° 15' 00" E ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 42.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING . CONTAINING 3314 SQUARE FEET • Beng\johnrh\fanno6.des • c 11'\.'\'`'11- 1't't'�'`'•�!^f... _ r•i hte+4 f� f ! OFFICIAL SEAL f i``n NANCY M EMERY f f L'''r" No .0 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ry_ f COMMISSION NO.048590 f My Commission Expires: 8-018-9� • f MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG.28,1999h �1'�1\11' - .'�\'�1'`1-�11'�11'�•�1T'`11� `"� . .=:�S.1 i;-;1 Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this I"3 day of di y 19 18 • P. . w + CCity Engineer ,,; �}ri 'g, NO CHANGE IN TAX STATEMENT ^� 3 T•\FNf:\PT TR-FORM\RTKPD-IN.DOT , r' , .t S P • 2S1 2AC 1101 ,. 2S1 2A 1100 A . SQ. • l' • PATHWAY EASEMENT 2S1 02AC ' :7... • 1 • 1 • 1 I. ' I •` I 3 • I I . . • _ . : . , .. _ .,,,; _•:.„.„..,...,...„...,.„,„,,,..„.„. ,. :. ,,..„%,:::,,..„..:„.„,..,,,„,,_. ,,• ,• Washington County BARGAIN AND SALE DEED G KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that The Wetlands Conservancy, Inc. , an Oregon nonprofit corporation, hereinafter called grantor, for the consideration hereinafter stated, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the City of Tigard, hereinafter called grantee, and unto grantee's heirs, successors and assigns all of that certain real property with the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, situated in the County of Washington, State of Oregon, described as follows, to wit: See Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Ul J" To Have and to Hold the same unto the said grantee and grantee's successors and assigns forever, for public park and greenway use. The true and actual consideration paid for this transfer, a-¢ stated in terms of dollars, is $-0-. However, the actual c consideration consists of or includes other property or value given c, or promised which is the whole consideration. W In construing this deed and where the context so requires, Nthe singular includes the plural and all grammatical changes shall be implied to make the provisions hereof apply' equally to wcorporations and to individuals. �_- THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED °) IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the. grantor has executed this instrument on this /54 day of r:Pbrua ei , 1991. GRANTOR: THE WETLANDS CONSERVANCY, INC. ■'; �� 41W.,e11.v.e___, •HN W. BROOME 'resident The Wetlands Conservancy, Inc. , an Oregon Nonprofit Corporation Page 1 - BARGAIN AND SALE DEED, - 1 STATE OF OREGON SS County of Washington I,Jerry R. r of Assessment and Taxation rder of C on- veyances for i d c e' ertify that the withinrs {q� f ,�, eceived andrecor•,=d B�aounty. b* � gpj�ar or of ressr ea :.. . 612 t Ex- � roe'. . '; ;a 7(;) t4.l.: i__ e 2 , y �rirni3 O s a� N COUNT• ' Doc : 91011577 Rect: 50558 48. 00 • 03/11/1991 02: 22: 25PM ..... _ , (//' ' 111 . III . • STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of b6SNZw<-pTD/J) Theegoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 814 day of -(?.hrU a r ei , 1991, by JOHN W. BROOME, President of THE WETLANDS CONSERVANCY, INC. , an Oregon Nonprofit Corporation. GZQc ; • `-;;.' N ry Public for Oregon IN$TARTWISEAL) My Commission Expires:,�//0 f \\ " Y '-< r� r • AFTER RECORDING, RETURN TO: SEND ALL TAX STATEMENTS TO: Kenneth M. Elliott City of Tigard O'Donnell, Ramis, Crew & Corrigan P. O. Box 23397 Attorneys at Law Tigard, Oregon 97232 1727 NW Hoyt Street Portland, OR 97209 • orec\tigard\coft.bs4/smc Page 2 - BARGAIN AND SALE DEED • 2 STATE OF OREGON ) . ,5 ? A County of Washington 1 ss I,Jerry R. HansQp„p e 0!of Assessment and Taxation a x•Off c o rder of Con- veyances for OA ceynty4dcO re' ertify that the within �jr e r egt=of�wciti fi'v eceived In and recor•=d br� k of r rs aounty. • rr�t,:3E;Mangy raptor of A$sessgaent in .1= atii , Ex- • H C O O . • Doc : 910115'77 Rect: 50558 48. 00 03/11/1991 02: 22: 252M s • - _ IP . Exhibit A • • Order No. W75167 Page No. 4 DESCRIPTION All of Lot 13, NORTH TIGARDVILLE ADDITION, in the City of Tigard, in the Northwest quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, EXCEPT the South 409. 44 feet and also EXCEPTING the following,: Beginning at a point which is the Southeasterly corner of the above described • tract; thence, North 39°53 ' East 66 feet to a point; thence, North 22°29' West 78.95 feet to a point; thence South 76°41 ' West 55.84 feet to a point; thence North 57°40' West 138.50 feet to a point; thence, South 32°18' West 71 feet to a point; thence, South 57°40' East 234.60 feet to the point of beginning. Also except the parcel of land belonging to the City of Tigard described as follows: Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of Lot 13, NORTH TIGARDVILLE ADDITION; thence from said corner following the meander of Fanno Creek 290 feet more or less to the center of County Road #1496 (S.W. Grant Avenue) ; thence South 32°18' West 24 feet more or less; thence South 33° 45 ' East 150 feet; thence South 51°16' East 121.40 feet; thence South 30°35' East 24.55 feet; thence Northerly to the place of beginning. . • s • • J - IN • as a8� County of Washington 1 ss I,Jerry R. Hansg�,,p 9r of Assessment and Taxation at Ex-Off c� rder of Con- veyances for i cgpngdo,f,hare' ertify that the within s r "t of wrL�h�'Ow received and recor•:dkh �,ikaf r-} •r f�aiounty. .�13rry7j :H4.n 9 ppe�r or of Assessment" a,`•• . ='tab. , Ex- ti Q� H N� COu ' Doc : 91011577' ~ fir,, V.6: Rect: 50558 48. 00 ?� 03/11/1991 02: 22: 25PM ' NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 4 T2S R1W, W.M. • �. ; 600 Co 3DZ 3c1 900 RD 9.01 4/ loot) 2 J4, I S0 o s+� it Iloo 1901 _'R� 19oc 190 1501 : 701 . C� 1802 150 ' l4a0 X503 1500 Iff Described Area 1601 1700 _ Q,� • . . G r 2000 • 4/p -N- SON 1300 goo S 900 l000 NORTH • . _..,•K NO SCALE STATE OF OREGON a15 i o2Blk County of Washington SS I,Jerry R. Hans2p„p or of Assessment and Taxation a Ex-Off c��prder of Con- , veyances for�p cQyntQQdc, reb" ertify that the within Ip'S r,,��{{rr,nne0t=ofrw^Lnkyv t received and recor•ed iqliook:ofir r s fl,sal o unty. : ' � ' * RFI.Y�Fj;m _Hn 7Ire or of f Assessent-- rid,TjaRati;n, Ex- • Q \co• ou z v,2 � ).0N COUNv' Doc : 91011577 Rect: 50558 48. 00 i'.;,. 03/11/1991 02: 22: 25PM ...•4'_f _•..• .-. -........--..a.u.aaua• .�.... •,asw.a fv.,ayw ow.,u/• STEVEN6-NESS LAW PUB,CO.,PORTLAND,ORE. 111,) all coulto 1Y-V b 1 •- `Y' , e . KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That WARNER'S, INC, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Oregon in consideration of Ten and No/l00 Dollars, -o and other good and valuable consideration o L- to it paid by JAMES..Il.I.LLOCIK..and.-.BETI...M....WILL.QCK,...hus-band..-an.d..wif_e •D , grantee.S., o- w has bargained and sold, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the said grantee.S., the i r heirs and assigns, all the following real property, with the tenements, hereditaments and a. appurtenances, situated in the County of Wash i ngton , and State of Oregon, bounded io and described as follows, to-wit: `^ Lot 10 and all that part of Lot 12 of the Amended Plat of North Tigardville o Addition, Washington County, Oregon, excepting therefrom the following described c tract of land, to-wit: > o Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Lot 12; running thence Northwesterly o along the North line of Lot 12, 77 feet to a point; thence Southwesterly parallel to the East line of Lot 12, 200 feet to a point; thence Southeasterly o parallel to the North line of Lot 12, 77 feet to the East line of said lot; o thence Northeasterly along the East line of Lot 12, 200 feet to the point of o beginning; t„ EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion platted as Brookside Park, and EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion platted as Brookside Park, Plat 2, ID Washington County, Oregon, 0 SUBJECT TO: Rights of the public in any portion within boundaries of roads a and highways, and easements, restrictions and conditions of public record; Assessments for the use and benefit of the Tigard Sanitary District. c . 0 +.J To Have and to Hold the above described and granted premises unto the said grantee.S., their co L heirs and;;assi¢nt§,forever: °) 6 o''�4'' i Done by order of the Board of Directors, with the seal of said corporation, �'_�� ° ;""::'°, this 7th day of January , 1964... •w s .• me�i� . Januar C +„ f 0 ° r '� WARNER'S INC.•( • •;'!,,,•-: 4 . ."' C r � • � �q`, r c .; V q` e B y...... . llksi'1 'j- A16 �� President --,A-i.i:)T..4 O* f� . ' STAtt*;'0 ON; fei.. fre i Secretary . 4. 11 V* r . • ss. County of Multnomah On this 7th day of...� Janu ly 64, before me appeared Frank] n W. White and R.-..An.thony...D.uBay both to me personally kno ' , who being duly sworn, did say that he the said Franklin...W.....White is the President, and he the said E3..--.Path atty...Ru•Ba.y is the Secretary of the within named Corporation, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said Cor- poration, and that the said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said Corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and Franklin W. White and R. Anthony DuBay `\t�,,,;j,( � acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said Corporation. �ti� ::'.�i(i u 1 /, IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official C�-.• " n''; seal the day and year last above written. • ",»ts,•,� 1 h, r;' ir C' %,t i ...:, j'G:;i:': ,, = Notary Public for,, a on• ''. e u ,..1, C My Commission expires -2 i 66 _._. Q0 Bargain and Sale Deed STATE OF OREGON ° Corporation County.,of Washington 4.ss WARNER'S, INC, ,, 1:4 a'I:if rt n.,Tkio D4edtfsr ,of Records and E1gciianp:iand iEx=.0fficio:Reorder of Conveyances (DON'T USE THIS fgr .Baird:county, do herel?y certify ;that the within TO SPACE; RESERVED writing vists sec wed_ and recorded • Z FOR RECORDING ] vv ,,,, ,p Z LABEL IN COON• iri�'pOOk'-- T- _•=-1;= •-i-- - /�'-'-�-�-� JAMES WILLOCK, et ux TIES WHERE in 99" I4,eCOr4i3-Eif�„_r- _ -1� S M i ulna.) of sad'd(Connty.,_ .•` r, •- Witness ms y H dnd •and•8ear affixed. Q WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO •••••'', OGER THOMSSEN, Director _ ' — • � , / / %,s G=/Y,A)-1;e- 4,5Y �Q Deputy �`0 -� !/• -,y , G�,. . ._,. BOOK 507 PAGE 334: • ” PM '64 P — . Mat .2 3 01 1, a 406 Olik'.j 'r •r. :. I ,'. The sketch below is made solely for the purpose of assisting in locating said premises and the Company assumes -no liability for variations, if any, in dimensions and location ascertained by actual survey. Pioneer National Title Insurance Company T; TITS AND TRUST DIVISION / } ■'1;. _-� '. W .✓ J 1 :.-/ O I C '� 0 ! e M r. .n N y e N 0 RI r4'�•', N O •r a ,,.•; ,J ri 3L9 o „_,, 7 s e9°zs'w , ,_ . _i ....... .,.. • • N 0 • • • n r 5 5 4. h 6C S6 '7 44 Y 79 0 • p r� -r H TIGAR �, �� N 40 '7oSE A ore. W 6 -J\N s 0 s e ( ' : ......• ., . Z sE *1-4---. t f r' ti 6 2 7 N 82 8 , _ s .\ n', \) I I� • "* 829 • . el J j Nei°le ,.r - , •I0 h • . :',;!..1._. r-13('Nr, '...f" !.• I.\ ..-...,.. .."}„ .3-,\ , .9 - ;t 82C _ 8 3 c , • fI e ,° U� / t~ •qc`• IM A'• • 831 vti 1000 4• -',.,^ v.: ,.1 231"..., ; k. i 4 r. _ i' •bsY • V i'IR( )KCIGF OW 1 4i _ ''e, qE-• ,, 51I J�. J o, ,: soo°..z5r ��82� s 822 ,� lr •`� ,o ~ y 1 / Z I �� . .. 824 a 82I cti sj..*-816 - .. 43, r': 5 < ti r. - _ '•\ \� z I S h v 0 A —F 9: i ~-, l.off. • �,\,.,, e')' IP• J 80 I `. �� �i f ;,C i ♦ ‘*/,#/0: 820 •0 �.+ ` he 4e • • , 2..... s i 2- 6 8 . 1� 1 % • , (V I l r '• . .: ln• • : j h'r'• `( .s t y t. r k l t r..,1 i• a wC � l . f .� •yr ,}1Yni i .i� 5 1 �... - 1 k. �•R .ii; 4 t' ,i 4 r 2;:.:ti F x':: 9 MM 'br :;• °y:n i -'4 i •r�:+. .fi t:Si isx A C� , , ,a:•l'+ , \' ^'L ^4'1, . r.4 4 Y�g i' r � . .. i re' .CC sl t .l'i `tr - bO' : t O:', r v :f'Y,Y.t r :,,r ' . ni 1, S a.. Hr: n e t4•, � 0 : Y{ 4x 4 i x l Y'• . I O t^ti r `fir iy:1 w { • ,nf :;i ,,,�: .i ' i a t Q f 10 Op R9 ry r • • a c. • Lr 4: ':•.9 0.. ...: L'4 : "1S.ax i": i•i ;57 v - a i• ,..• '. . 0 r •.�4.1 1�,1I , r . s,.d 1 ,' r :i a .rT rF l J H O . , i} - Y Q ;.S: ` j* ' .� "'' tii d y : - 'i':x: 'p !" :. 'c9J . x as '4\ -d' * : dD'• •.''t 'v it � iH,,r lr u.. O a ',lt yy F F-i -E=r . ' '.� •y, ::s �:' ,` w ;(u A f: ' s. . -• :-'- ? :.':9 -y SS - :• . . sp`/ 1600 SAo 9s.'•(C.S:.N1:11;449 •go,A�' a6 y 13� :;;e',a•• • ! Q'.: v7 '�'3;+, r�i•"' • 1200 ° ¢' >Y•^J i?t;Rii::-ti•..Sri" :�,a:,' :$'•. �i^" t• • o?9o'w 3./OA(' . . { 5'4 ` o a� ' ;} o • a ,•'v .. .. o ra' •: ''�• • A r,:. 53 :' . 1* • • / ' • G `'.ti, e�9 • • • •p Z1 /0 .0 �ti�/. • .,...,.. ..L. ....—...aaweaa. na■■ OMLLLGaDL STEVENS-NESS LAW PUB.CO.,PORTLAND,ORE. . ' ''''"1421:5''''' ''-''''' '' '' • '. .• ANI of• . ''i ,} <W ,:'.7'KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That I HEDV " :•. , lG.._>3LtEL.Ii�I,.._unremarri2. i. , Via'; =,wid o.w,‘Q f'.F.ranic._.13.rel.in • 'titiAltt:1!,,,;..T.,,,.,:.:. ��;•' !:);' .., , grantor , a.✓0 ..' ,. Y,s 4 k, in'consideration of Teil.._aS1G�-..X10#0 Dollars, ;' W' ..:aid:--other valuable consideration.�_r�-t.i_Q totaling. than. $100 • pct.;�..'; . to , ."•m4 paid by CITY'�,rh=y. �^..,;,;.',' P Y .0F...xZGARI?. a.•.n�una.ca�p.a.l.i.ty Of...the---S_tate.._cf • �) +.:,;:. :., •- , grantee...., ,' ":5 ;, ':;•. ,,. do • hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the said grantee....,1tS successors Frs arrd assigns, all the ,',',.* f.::k•.;.*:.' following real property, with the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances, situated in the County of " ' ' Washington and State of Oregon,bounded and described as follows, to-wit: i :. • ' A portion of Lot 13, North .Tigardville Addition described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of that tract of land described .. in Book 378 Page 668 Deed Records of Washington County, Oregon, • • said point also being the southeast corner and point of beginning °" 4 ' .'•:' of the remaining segment of Lot 13 not sold; thence N 39° 53' E. ''' • 30 feet more or less to the old channel of Fanno Creek; thence in• ,4:- :.•'•. , .• a northwesterly direction following the meander of Fanno Creek 290 ',. '' ,feet more or less to the center of County Road #1496 (S .W.Grant Ave. ) thence S. 32° 18' W. 24 feet more or less along the center line of •#county road #1496 (S.W.Grant Ave . ) ; thence S. 33° 45 ' E. 150. 0 feet; - 1Y ' ` thence S. 51° 16' E. , 121.4 feet; thence S. 30° 35' E. , 24. 55 feet : to the place of beginning; excepting County ::Road #1496 (S.W.Grant ' ▪ Ave. ) • . • i s: r `'•rcc ' To Have and to Hold, the above described and granted premises unto the said grantee...., .._its . siiccessC� and assigns forever. i. 0::',' U Witness my hand..,. and seal.._. this f ce day of May 19--.6.4.. • ' 0 K �° �'Y'' ., ' (SEAL) } ".z. nI l�Ivq' L/ (SEAL) ";iJri}`"r .. . s7?€' (SEAL) •;'.; 1 + :•'Y;` STATE OF OREGON, (SEAL) .vi*}ss. ^'':.'" '� County of Wa hin ton p� �''}' �'r �>>�'',:• Y g On this ° day of May , 19.64'.., . ^:` • •;•.;1, . 't.,,•before,.'gre, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the-, ' •- R: K. , \.*w� :z1p aed HEDVIG_.BRELIN „ ,...:v.,4-? �z l ,yti ';'.07)4,. .c r'. who is .;i:47-:.:;4, I '° '” nown to me be the a ;Vjr• :'. .wo ' , ;•�; ` $ to e identical individual_.__ described in and who executed the•within•. . �; qc;; '° i o#instrument, and acknowledged to me that executed the same freely and voluntarily.',',', s • 11l ', �.4r `r;;, ' �� '' ' IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,I have hereunto et my&and and aff• ed my official . °.t,�•'I r, '• „ � .4 t I. s,seal the day and year last above written. � /L a .:. ..'.`';'t;,, I {'i „ ;..a,,: 1 ;;k .S, ' .••t+f ''� ,`� _.._A� �i. .1.'L :_.�_.c• (a� '. .y,I%•k'gry I a }^' . a S. d :,f �."F �r gi;,`t,t�` otary Public f �Or Eon ,p;4; i� M ,s' ,IJU�u um; __ .. . . .My co mis :C 4 5 7 `'`��' ;e ..'F t• .Avt14f Y: Sion expires. ' st .v` '�'f'F N 1.j 9 h g .,-_- rs ,44.' " 'Bargain and Sale STATE CIP Fr! !` • y".. : _ti, — ` a'+a h'F C�^t°K 4 County.,of5Washing3� e . ms, • d I.I I Inc , . r_' ;•...1' `'^ ;•r,y ,,,,'i, I.'Ffo er Thamas Director of Records and ,,, .Electiorie'#n ha-Off) Reorder of Conveyances'" a r',` for said' 'unfy..de. hefeby'gts}•tify that the within .ti�,•,,k. `'v .?-;,P'•,..1't �I'•jam+.-i.)•.T,Q (DON'T E USE RESERVED instrurnen pf b.�rVrihnq wqs received and recorded,! ' •`-..•ri '' �.•".`,,Z% SPACE: RESERVED (,,,..•` ,,, • {, ow,r,I,: / 47 i a in boRk _,.,,e.,_:` 1��d2.._ .4 ..-.1.4: ,y r; FOR RECORDING � •� ry. • ti• .p s .• .�•• • LABEL IN �GCOr[1S•af' 1'y �S g Tt S''•� COON. in old — ,l' tZ ;X,- 5..41,i�y�: ;.';' , TIES WHERE of Said lALtrityf _ :'f•.'•!�''.'............. ....:.: USED.) ! �';)•'."i1 Witness my hand and seal affixed. Ls ':',,• yL,,.{" r;'I.ER'RECORDING.,RETURN TO. . ¢r7 t? �; Gr; _ s ;.,..: ROGER THOMSSEN,• Directaor '• .% r'•i, I A• Ate, DERSON ''w':; .. .; ,� : -P • 3.s'AT'LAW : t'''..;:f:./A,' - .a.. •• :>:'::' f P Y:'r, �:: ,,:' OTFIFI•BLDQ' r. r . a N-"" r, y c"•',Vic .e.ae, ,� x , rub. , •> sil. �•° a' ` " 514 PAG 4 PR), ?c 0 _ -!, >� ► ',.::•.r• ,• X1', I < .... .`A" .1")l;fKtl'I+..s fK1. . (e • • 1 NARROW f BRIDGE"Sip I 15/8"Iron Rod - • x _ fI l5/8"Iron Rod��WOOden �.---- -- -- -- �s -- -- -- -- -- -- 5./8 hen Rod_ I r i / z I Plot BwwQy 1� ri 1 I I ' I CTE Yorker x W �N Table 1 6' I Curve No length (ft) Rodas(ft) Delta Tangent (fl) I 1 i Link Fence I I 0 23.56 1500 2158.19" 1500 1 8 Aop , x "35 I i I 0 23.90 1500 2158.19" 15.34 ' PGE/5869 OS ' SIGN h•m • I GRAVEL © 11'46 10000 5717'45" 5.74 I • Ta Meter I $ +~ h I ------ ----- ------ © 104.88 81.00 7044'08' 61.25 i ` 1 1 i� .■ j o c Remove :at 0 45.93 94.00 . 605Y11' 23.43 8"Apple I ', Existing Asphalt Troa e e e a AC •• . ent Root J 14".• Sonitorr YH I 'NO MOTOR ° v I� 10•• 8- ...nu � ® 11850 16500 34'43 29" 61.94 1 � Rm 1 86 \1 SKr /'�.:••a o 0 ....rasa.. 0 _ -.L4 0 ,_' • I 0 11.67 100.00 571 Y45" 5.84 I . -°w: Oak I� 4tI Fence 3•Barbed 1 \ 'I �''$+iw:••:\\\\'��•-—'' '..:►►�. ..` Oak f�'i//I I 1 tyre Fenn x1 14' Culvert ` t•7►\\ec�.• -- ��=�.�_ 1� Z h. I PI F :!: E:5Rod I - + x o .• Planted ��G ,. B. 1 I "FANNO CREEK" - '.: o s o c 2" Trees ��� �� I ' / J t 1 r-IV* •�^ o,. /I Exist 1Y01P "'y ' i b• 1/2 Iron Rod Sit Fence 1 i / -- -- -- c 4'ylire 1E w 156.10±/ �,� s W/RPC Yanked Storm ----- . ' \-t: +$E 5 Fence 1 ( 1 Detention •$ 1 :ill. o m 4 na 1 R•Orop \ 1 'DEA Con tray Pond X x X i i ..- 1 j�1 ./Headwall) © �`�,\ protect in Place 1 1 I I E I \\\ p EE p °ti4�' EC �•.‘i: %\\7 ` ' i I --- 1 2' Trans Wee ,�\\�•' f I X 121 i 1 Iron : i I n 1 I co) Fence ��\�\ •Z --� _ 1 - W Marked 11 g 14"N" • 1—-- \ _ . \N��� �aat F I o I 'OEA Control- 'Boot O 115 m + r-' -T-5°. 1 . . I 16 0okk�� .� ------------ �` ' 1 Protect In Place I� -vl 1 Polh.a Centerline I- Wetland�_oundory 0. 16%2)12(2)Maps °o 1 I / - 1 l W 14'Mope 0 Pi I r 1 1.. g 1Foot L + e S I I 50 Newly II • 1 d LEGEND 1 1 Planted 12' 4a�le� I 1 Y Trees I' T ` ® Wetland Impact within 30' Buffer I 1 i All -------------------- ----- Hoot Y i X ' 1 I ------________-_-- 1 Sanitary MK Top of 4'Fence 1 i1 I Rim.158.14 II Bank Fence PATHWAY ' FANNO SEEK __ // 2.5' S. 2.5' - ---- - __ -- - ---------------------- 18'Y,\ i 7 3' CLASS C AC 5 1 _ ------------- --- ----- \ 16- la -- ' I BacldWy ___ t f 21l SLOPE -� 21< ? I ___-__---_ 3/4'bran Poe \ x �� • 8" OF 3/4-0 Scoter w 30' ■ \\ y • NOTE: Sat fence and blo-bog shall be installed along wetland �\ \ ; 1/2"Iran Rod boundary and Nat structures respectively o^9 \ i W/RPC Marked TYPICAL lE1L'71OM ABBREVIATION to provide adequate erasion control for I i 1 IDEA Contra' Not To Scale the project Edge Of Pavement I 1 R/W Right of Way • W/RPC With Red Pastic Cop . W/YPC With Vega.Plastic Cop - - � 1 FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 1 Q��+ VANNIE T. NCUYEN °� Ovae>,eec SWOON FROM APPROX. 400• NORTH OF BW TKs1ARD ST. TO SW NORTH DAKOTA ST. m„pp. aescaa :. =11 LAYOUT 1.`14'T + CITY OF a1wI W ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Fi..E N0. 260 DWG NAME: MIT TU HO,L THOMAS OREGON .ate ca ma.as 10.X Mom� I N\ENG\1998\FANNOI\SfTE L1 •'coins npues onw.mwe =MOM g * CIP98-05 • • i Edge c; ` 1 / �t 7� '.\„,-1 1 1 W/YPC Marked Fowler School `iti' j'alik' �t 1 /"TECH CNGR PLS 99c" Trock V U: 6x11IieId S Running Field - ,, 6okstc- Fowler Schaal e • a£+ I Boll Feld A I ,,4":401 , 61:3".....;;,--- :g W m /�'•iron •.dl 1 J - �� 1 i ' ' ,\ \N • l♦�-ate ° 1 I 1 \\\\ /J I +, �I,I 1 I 1 RCW • \ I a r I Top of Bonk _-,Y /�\ I 1 • II j 1 ' 1 \ II / /.------ \\ �\ Cum Table I• P �"' I • • `` lI ///�/�-__1 \ \\ oa1s2 T• - 12.34 10.00 70 42-13\ \ � \ t1 57.09 74.00 44-12-13 3o.ps 'I 1 I 1 `� / 0 112.58 134.00 48-Oa-09 59.85 ' f� I I I \ I I �/ I \\ \ 0 20.79 50.00 23-49-05 10.54 I �I + • i' I Z 5/6" Ircn Rcd I / I \ 0 294.34 175.00 96-22-02 195.61 w 24+1 w/YPC Marked \ 4{a • ,,[ ��f OEEC PLS 2553" ' I \ I \ \ 49 5186 100.00 30-51-34 27.60 I 1 \ \\ 1 1 ? 42.17 100.00 24-09-34 21.40 •• t-J I I �' 5/2-V IRON ROD \ I ' I 0 39.27 25.00 90-00-00 25.00 V � A#•11• _•./AL. CAP MARKED _ \ \ / / '(• 20.24 15.00 77-19-38 12.00 \ ; ?3.14412 t • I -KURA9ASHI Lc 1945 I\ I it 22.62 15.00 86-23-10 14.08 I I 6" Iran Rcd • \ \\ i• \ WC •Mark1553-d \ �� \ \\ I / � f 11�•• \ \ I EEC PLS . 1 •. \ 1 \P Nail• ` \ Pathway ♦ I I \ t 5/6" Iran Rod \, ) I 1 \\_ LEGEND a I 1 -NARROW 4. ' /YPC Marked �� \ \ • \G Markel 1 E.'<!DGE- Sgr. L J O6EC PLS 2553" \ \` \ -- ---_ I I 6rida- ROw \\ \ \ Wetland Impact Area ` tl 2 3/a' Gross Co^ I \ \ \ i 1 1 Marked CITY OF TIGARD `\ I \ \ ® Wetland Import within 30• Buffer .?1.44-11 '0 -T SURVEY CONTROL • _ - l. 4.1 I 6' UNLAWFUL TO DISTURB- \ \\ N. tkf.• ; �I 4Y. I , .. 30. \\ \ i 27+80.35• CansL Steel Posts - 2 ea 1 1 r �• \ \ of ice►••,•wir 2 SECTION CORNER \ \ 110 . 2 75 1/2 ALUMINUM CAP - 111 MARKED WASH. CO. \ \ "OEA CONTROL" \ �� .' ` 653433.1201 - SURVEYOR t982 _ N(• 7615726.1201 W/RPC Morkeo \ UNLAWFUL TO DISTURB `� \ ?/2" Iron Rod \ `- �\ Top of Bank i P Eg566"� 1 /E�lisl AC -1- �, _SPEED 35" ■ _�� `\ \ \ Px S• At.L1 .+� �.`//Q-__��� tin�Asphalt Tro;, ■ ` \\ \\\ \\ ! Irk •;,J� anitary MH• ` \ \ \ �/ q / Rim=taa.86 NOTE Sted pmts shop be constructed as per \ N. I ' / S crm MH Standard Delos No. 192 of the Standard . \\ \ \ IM=15a.C5 Details. Pmts shad be pointed with red �oair+otl1°o'o_ \ \ \ N. a7>'avn 7 o'o. Pathway \ \ \ \ I 5/'•• and while stripes. oar NOW--/t F �\ \ .. ,. Irv- Rcd rPes• • 2.5' 5• S• 2.5 �\ \ \\\ F_ntle At I'/ •� -S� Existing Ground - • • - \ ■ • �•,- � "..7 , �� . -- ^\ STEEL POST DETAL N.T.S. \\V\\vv,\ 3� Doss�C AC `\ ■ \ �yf. 1 l 2%Slope-o- 27G ?. ■\ ` ., \ r.: .- H-- - '�`� - Aggregate Shoulder 8' Of P?• `y •-0 wb . ° OW) FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 2 +a 1 N tt VANNIE T.NGUYEN P.E. ` I""R ' ,,.,,.�„ TIGARD STREET TO TIEDEMAN AVENUE TYPICAL SECTION 111,I„It' N.T.S. aauoe •61. 'I I LAYOUT *t°'6Y CITY OF 71til�RD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT >•ST N K.Y.AK]tEIE OREGON ones s0.•w0.as FAE N0. 2600 OWG NAME: • m.o.mor 's I- I 4��µ we cP99- N:\ENG\1999\FANNO2\SITE I Li • • • • 1 I I I ' ' / / / I L I I ,, _________.___.___ / I ! ...... MEADOW STREET — _ ( , , / N N 652500.1365 E 7315613.9251 I Join Eclat AC . A ' `/ \ ' '�/ © •.•coder. I I I I 1 t a Curve Table ��d I I I ', Ozb 146.tatgth(ft) Roar(A1 Delta Togott(ft) W yt `, It M •. •I . ,+ C 0 21.18 10 121-71•55• 17.81 2 3/0. Bross Cco 7 " o al _ Marked City c( \06 ‘41.S0 'r I t YW O 13.07 15 4954.50 6.98 Tigord Control Pc■nt" 0q �4� °/6" Iron Rc c —— —— 0 \ :,'� — o Cop. +O.0. — — , ,I +g , a 0 28 60 25 6552 36• 16.09 3 CM- °��=z:'- 12+00 13+00 ', '.. .`� 0 34.83 25 79.49.34' 20.91• �' c\; . - -•°ll iBn 9d ��• 1 i - —1 I 4+00 1 15+00 WI•i1 W. -- -- 0 36.15 25 825100 22.06 / ..9 • —— —— —— —— 'a♦ E><ist .,t it 4. 0°' I snit° :...s';1� —— `. �ir>Ly19e • P 5/8-PCr A� Rod '[7 I -•�c�ROO R/,M for Future �- / "OEEC FEir ed I 7. 0 w/ e 1 51� I I Cct�� . ♦ I r 60C N NGad ARot & Christie verett 1 102 SW Kathene Stret 1 1 gardOR 973:::;::; ; Eii: " j ,� l Wash. C. i9E'L" !• i (JW SEC COS \ I ,.N `37 •athwey 8 Centerline /■ \' �'5. 8 I — I I 0.G \ \ 1 I 1/2- tr.- od I\ 1FRC M°r•_. \ othwoy Centerline `t SC I c "ULA Control" R/W for Future 1 w CON Johnson Street To cf Kenneth K Alice Tolliver I Eon4 \ \ .7-'-'",. 10200 SY!Katherine Street LEGEND...i \ „1,J \ I I Tigard. OR 9722.. I / • \ \ I I ®/ 1 ° I Wetland Impact within 30•Buffer rete ) \ . N, + I ' \ Sa� g -- ---, 1 I I I I \ J! 41°4' i I II t I {P ce =/6 Iron Rod _/Y s Morked _ ,Jr •�� oris I ASSCC. =�S 2264 1 1 ,. .1,0^,-?, . I I 1/2 Iron Roo m LI—— /RPC Mcr4ec Gh Oin EICCk it°fI I bE0 Coo of �� . It 5/6 Iron Rod I Link Fence w,Ece•d r 1 .r Nc Cop. Bent. er` Propane Took �• a- +C.3 I Block Wail \ w/ Guard Posts �C^' O Jc �° amitor / Chain Link —— —— —— —— —— a Ri = _,8< � � ° (-k�i =,Si.Og ' Odey Learsn��)' ��lf? Sonitor I Low Sgn' / >VR;i� /,-��^ R..- �`. two 1/2- Iron Rod r a /RPC Morked wry /� / re�� �.\ ?� j �) �44. 1.:21+00 +00 �!� 3+00 +00 `_mica/a = ��.. gsph0/t p - 1 I, i \\,,: t` �w�=wi �� — ter` V���. � �rp ork'n9 inr �_�J�� ent 4 ille ` <\•tGv ;� ��,dY�% W. 19SA Bu fler_� 4 \ I PK mil y� r 1.9.9 / 1 Pomeroy 1 _ \ f T E � ,n: �� Gtr m rg°ra `. J t.- P«r ee eR en 2.5 5• 5• 2.5 / �i t°ry tTiord. I+°u sl3 ',a, �� ,,:". „.1 .S 0 R....=10.9.77 Tiq°r°.C 7722_ 1.,J / Existing Ground _—S Ill. \`V•�� 3.Cosa .C. AC ��r,._t5 r-7 22 slope 2X --1.-- /1\--"j / we�tar? ,�ca A99regota Shoulder + `!/�v� -� '�+ ` SEEK '�2i ,,,,P marl - 3/4' - 0� (Typ) 8' OF 3/4'-0 \�j�1, \\ -' 1 ao GPO° Scole: 1" = 50' Z W TYPICAL SECTION N.T.S. 3a„s,� VANNIE T. NGUYEN A FANNO CREEK TRAIL—SEGMENT 3 s„.N.= 11j1I TIEDEMAN AVENUE TO WOODARD PARK 01=011 _. l =u LAYOUT CITY OF TIGARD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FILE No. 260 DWG NAME: Rau KARLEEN M. AICHELE OREGON um as.au as IMAM COCCOS AM t N\EMG\199f\FANNO\SITE Li wave. I DC TECHNICIAN LCrt CM”- . • • . . / I i , \ N A I , / SIP■ ` T/c4Ro Sl �l / I \/�r �- / , .y� � `k+\ Exist Parking Lot /.../..,...../—Praperty Lls•-/ ■ * fiikep •..,..,- / 7/' \.. 0 / (� \\ .and Meo jam` _ 7 /1 &/ § \ \ -/� moo=.. "•.\ �F a , / / /I / // r;a \\ \\ \ ����.�` Frye Electronic Inc. / �� / / (c/v p 9826 SN Tord SL emo.e t \ ` Z W Fence ■\ , ■ \ \1 \ \� \\ 6y_ a -\ Rm ///4 / '/ P \ \----- \ \ ♦. ,$1\1 ♦ Esist Forking Lot / -- mss. / G� / \ -- \ \ \ �i �� �� �� ----_ / 7/ //7 � ..� J ��4 , . \ �. --- `fie= / / / \ a°�► ��Rj� i /,' r%/ sist FANNO CREEK \ ���� • / / LEGEND 1 i _■_s��. .: ., ;�Gj wand +� �"' \\ 1'- '\-liph L---- .4' -,o// // WETLAND IMPACT AREA \ �� 17111: .11-111111�� .1) �` \ / // // vz WETLAND IMPACT NATHAN 30' BUFFER AREA \\ ��— � . w . ^ �,�+,• !' I'It �� A f'� Y �� 0,� -mot Ada' _ f,. ,,,` ■ \\ ,` \ r. 4,1 a �, /.4 ".*','4 ,... rye ���/���,' ■\ / mss r : ..0-- A. I,t► 0• Pathway c. 2.5' 5' 5' 2.5 �♦ Existing Gound ♦ � T. T t 2ope Aggregate Shoulder ry •, .-� ,• Mat — 3/4- - 0- (Typ) 8- OF 3/4'-0 '- -.. / ± n°n£ / // ZW3 SECTION A-q soap 1 - 60' ///, /r-vm, • N.T.S A Curve Tabu Olib Moo. Length(R) Rodin(ft) Delts T l9.tt(R) 8 15.13 50 17'2010- 7.62 2 48.40 50 552736- 26.28 �3 48.47 50 5522•54- 26.24 4 50.56 200 1429'05- 25.42 — 05 118.91 200 3493.56- 61.27 - 6 57.19 50 6531'59- 32.18 51.49 50 599025• 28.29 er+= ,N� FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 4 . YANNIE T. NGUYEN P.E. WOODARD PARK TO GRANT AVENUE 8 15.33 10 8T48'51- 9.63 _ t9XJ 16.09 10 92 11'09' 10.39 •""� otsaod i'i' -111 LAYOUT I. mi, t 14'r CITY 'WARD ENGINEERING SAL OEPARtMENTI I !Qi SO, K.Y.AIp/ELE OREGON um is wu sta FILE NO. 260E DWG NAPE: [� tvwp. oroum•c ac..o.n . .:fir gppg_ N:\ENC\1998\FANNO4\SRE L1 ..� ....� P� S : 1 /ii52\�, . / �;� ,/� \ Potnwor Air /// s' 2.5' j \� % 3'oats 'C AC Pathway/ / / .......... .. „Jr_. \ / �--272 f z7L Slope _/„.... �° r 4• 1........>„ / ' \ o \\\ / i�� g•or 3/4•-0 Mon —3/4'w- 0 (T p) , I 6 r■, / \\ ■ ■ A _______ © \\\ I ' t / .. \ ‘We•••i" i 3 � %\ \\ 2.75' °. I; ,% ro '\\° --N. LEGEND CO = 1,/ 4III^ nW \ / \ \\ ® tHetlOrnd Mnpoct wtth:,q 30• Buffer �n k/'�' N. N 2 15;;i \ O O N. N (// s \\ ..-- — NOTE: Steel posts that be constructed as per • / —� Standard Oetoi No. 192 of the Standard \ \ \ �� N. Details. Posts shalt be pointed with red ``` /// �� �/ ( '' \ \ \ // N. and white stripes. r \\ ��� Scae: 1' _ 20' l// II/� �,` \; F,qN� \\\ S. \ - .. , 1 1 / \ RFF \ ♦♦ /i I / / ' N `♦ �\ I / / 1 ,.' \ \ )1 / / ,.. .0 A / / / / • 4W4NY % \ N. S. i.; / 1 1 // I �- \ \ \ \ ■V4_ vw-tx......3b ti1---� " \\ \ ' % \1 / " \/ © i 1 Etistb g fence 1[' C P Path ¢ / / % \ it■N. • retalninq berm 1 i )I S. / ` I � � \� , , � . �.. 44,taNce �te ,l ►� Proposed 2500• / �v // •� Tae 17+1766struction \ 1 / 0 _ N 651257.9942 I 1 / \ \ \ \ // E 7616237.1143 I 1 / Join Exist AC ' , �� EDWE' #* VANNIE T. NGUYEN FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 5 � on ,.,G MANAGE, A GRANT AVENUE TO MAIN STREET pefppe __._11:31_k LAYOUT " CITY OF TIGARD ITARLEEN M. AICNELE OREGON ENGINEERING a FILE NO. 2600 OWG NAME: >l�t< Lamm wives oroexwNC n[pao/w P.M E r DEPARTMENT' CIP99- N:\._\FANNOS\SfTE I L.1 n'n ss..ma 11 • . • • 1 / / I •)1?. (4./ =— ._4 — _' , \ \ ice.___ -=-/ — — _ — EP Asii A Relocate Object '" 1� Yorker - Tea I _- u�nd Boundary _yi ./ / �l Swfocnq� 5,44.46•31 ' Install St Posts as Per k L l/�r� 6535. I. 'Steal Post Detai' - 2 ea I 0_ -- �is�:�o:;�:: 0 \ Curve Table _ r_=:' �/7/ir4/��///I/%//%_ _--i'���� �����' alb 00 Rade(V__Ma 'kneed(fW -�-__68!9 08 17.12 jrY��'' ��'3778.00' 17.04 ���/ ~1252 57' 564 E \ G�I� 7 —,lam - V/ AOr © 6.92 S 7920'17' 4,15 ^ao / J ----® 20.29 10 1161!•35' 16.08 8 IIS Z o \ © \ ` \ RAN o-, �' I i' 41j CI CI i P. / Pathway City of Nord / eR,o E \ \ Corduroy Cf y�Lr .t(� • vigor 4 !ate: 3'Ooss 'c' Ac \ N. \ °0.W 21<Slain __ (\(^\\\ ` .:4 El OF 3/4--0 �~ Aggregate Shoulder Yo Witt f- TYPICAL SECTION t7 - 3/4 - 0- (Typ) LEGEND NOT TO SCALE VA Wetland Impact .ithinq 30'Buffer PM ELEV - 148.67 5000• vc-- PM ELEV• 145.59 er f at , 1 n Pathway 152 $ ,3 * + 1 1 L 4• - m iya ^° •- ao Esist'nq Grade �1 Ir (t 1.0X) -1.00X I m +j F 7L. of Pothsay<E of P�a�Nwo7(E _ ' 6 • 2£ \ -0.407E 1 144 cg° -- ( t0.47Q p y�• i u 2 s ,l Cim C� _ 1 ( I I � I W-s . 136 N . " f m v� � -a: v c d..NOTE: Steal posts fhaR be constructed as per Standard Octal No. 192 at the Standard Details. Posts shall be pointed with red 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 and white stripes. STEELOTPO DETAIL eV=t= "v ♦+a ,1 VANNIE T. NGUYEN FANNO CREEK TRAIL — SEGMENT 6A .w�«R ail,. ASH AVENUE TO FANNO CREEK S - __.1.4.-„g=11 LAYOUT d. PROFILE `.14,T N * QTY OF 1lGA ENGNEERING DEPARTMENT nix NO. 260 DWG NAYS air KARLEEN 11. AICNEtE OREGON war z.war as Ior. '°Ns I orremNc icosw/N r n apse-13 N\ENG\1998\FANN06NSITE L1 rm r.rss \ ... . .. • • CurY8 Tale emb Ip WWI(R) Raan(t� Geka Toward(N (x+� 13.76 19.17 - 4190'50• 7.20 V 13.17 15 5098.15• 7.04 22.34 15 65'2+'04• 13.63 \t 25.40 +5 9700'53. 16.96 Pathway QS . 42.32 115 21'05'05• 21.40 1 \ 1 I. 4' h 4' 1' © 19.37 200 05.32'59• 9.69 \ \ ` See note See note \ 8 Q7 8.74 _ 10 50'05•26' 4.67 \ \\ 3• Doss • C• AC \ \ wwwwwww 5. WOODEN \ _ ° FENCE ON � OTTO SCRG ` / `•i �� `=�` C�11 RETAINING WALL 72566 SW MAIN 1 /4.-0(A8) Aggregate Shoulder • �� \ ► /Mo ts - 3/4• - 0• (T1'p) !`10+00.00 TO igg:gg 1+ d _1�- • 13+80.00 TO LINK"FENCE -/ NOT TO SCALE Ii ,.`• X=__ \ . Note: 5 s ` ��� • k �� 1 Path width narrows from 10' to W from 10+00.00 to 10+25.00. v SA o ` i ��� ° X I c - - I I •'1�� • •Y Q $°9� M� 2552 54w MAIN \ ed ' , + (COWS 1. 290' x 307 1 W •oncppg © End AC '•t 1 '�ll �"' gages .. /-` B..in Lurid•„ if 1 ,. Pathway \ \ / , Q Y IJ 1 1 11 I 1 Path Raging \\ - _ •odi xist Bridge III �' as per De eet 81 ` • I1 3' Doss •C• AC ;` VIII r 271 Slope ? _4 11/ `�co -�5 -�N » i \BS • = age Oe s °0 I r ti e' of 3/4._0(Ae) uego3/s:a,ldo(TrD) \ \ I 1 \ ' �� 0 0` -1�'" �I`fl NW et '. Lsr�111� i 12+80.00 TO 13+80. \,,,„ �'� Illcts' Lq It 1r. 14+90.00 TO 15+19.90 I 9y6 „ ` '° _ w N •;6.54'0 `,�'e��w NOT TO SCALE \ \0�0 I "��-1� N��� /�O II 1\77. __________\1:P. End 8idge `4 J 1111111111 B-•in :oord •,_ a 127-•-• l 111 •�ii'F57it9111i'I� •Iicrr;reGl install stet!' •psIts \\\ +"j `�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII..__aTSi1111111II11E:i11E111<�'r 5 a ox per'gee! I.° ° Detae• this eet Pathway Ion,•, / : um g i VI )1\ - :tars i o� o. W m° $ "•'Y'1 a a. •I l \ \' s Oetoes(typ) 1 °o 0 rim w :4: 6• M." 1, ' 4' / ,IS / I A-BOY ELECTRIC I• I 1 / / 1252G SW MAIN STREET ~ 2.75' / 1 I OC IacAtb r AI (n 4 - 1 I a STEVENS MARINE 1 RISC SW BURNHAM STREET NOTE: Steel posts shall be constructed as per - Notes: - I Standard Delae No. 192 of the Standard 1. Set fence shall be placed along the creek side far the entire length ength of the path Details. Posts shall be wrapped with red and around the bridge abutment excavation areas. and white tope in and alternating pattern. , control implemented - 2. Appropriate erosion control measure shall also be implemented for the staging area FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 6B STEEL OTPOSTE DET 4, N VANNIE T. NGUYEN P.E.DOGRORING• MANAGER „IIIllil AT MAIN STREET or_GOr __•_4_l -7111 LAYOUT 44,): Np�1'a aTM � 1IGARD ENDNEERING DEPARTMENT FILE NO. 2600 DWG NAME: ilwi K. U. AICNELE OREGON u+xs Ca•.IL WM IOxe: °isvos I DOWERING reoew.n J1 CIP99-02 N:\ENG\1999\FANN06\SITE L1 fo Eon • • City of Tigard ginadrd Tigard OR 97223 i*Y4141111 01 111\\ I I Phone(503)639-4171 i ' Fax: (503)684-7298 Letter of Transmittal Transmitted By: Date April 14, 1999 Project# 260B-F El Mail Project:. Fanno Creek Trails-Segment 1,2,3,4,5,6A,6B • 0 Will Call • [1] Other TPiii4i;:''.?" ddieSS1; FishnianEnyirOnMentalSer*es.:;,;: ;;!; • I•- . r 4 4341NrVW6th-Avenue State J04:: " POrtland- OR 97209 • We are Sending you... Transmitted... n Drawings Prints n For Approval fl Specifications (z) Plans N As Requested n Copy of Letter El Samples n For Your Use n Change Order Li Other • [X] Comment #of Copies Description 7 11 x 17 layout of Fanno Creek Trail - Segments 1,2,3,4,5,6A,6B showing Wetland impacts 1 Calculations for 30' buffer impact areas 1 Calculations for wetland areas(previously sent September 24, 1998) Items Are... isj Attached n• Under Separate Cover via Remarks: • Attached are preliminary plans of the Fanno Creek Trails indicating locations where the trail impacts both the wetland areas and areas within a 30' buffer of the wetland boundary. From: U-rjannie Nguyen x375 Karleen Aichele x379 • 4/19/99 • • Wetland Impacts due to Fanno Creek Trails • SEGMENT I PATH AREA I IMPACT LOCATION I BUFFER S.F. .F ER WETLAND ND .1 TOTAL S.F. STATION .F • '571 93474 ' 10+00 to 14+50 4215 0 4215 • 245' :." 2 26169 15+00 to 17+75 2735 20+75 to 21+30 644 24+50 to 25+50 328 • 13+50 to 16+50 4500 17+75 to 22+25 6750 • 3,707 11,250 • . 14,957 • :772i147577-7773°+7°76: 23+75 to 24+50 823 " ••- ,,r-4 • •.; . ' -,• 4 16815 12+75 to 12+25 861 13+75 to 14+25 382 14+25 to 14+50 337 15+00 to 17+00 390 19+00 to 19+25 392 19+25 to 20+00 447 20+25 to 21+25 612 • • 14+25 to 14+33 120 • 14+75 to 15+50 1125 16+75 to 17+25 750 3,421 1,995 5,416 5' ▪ 10755 11+75to13+25 463 1463 e'!!`' • T • ":; , • 6A 7350 10+75 to 12+50 2082 13+00 to 14+90 1621 0 • 3,703 0 • 3,703 6B • 3000 0 01 • •fl'• 95,479 8,122 7,500 31,015 Percentage of combined wetland and buffer impact - 33% • • • T ' • Wetland Impact Area Calculations Summary Existing Ground gm = Surface Area (not including shoulder) Avw Finish Grade \ \ \ �• = Surface Area (including shoulder) J_____. 8 = Softdesk Calculated Volumes 0.9167' 0 = Path Structure Section `v.) My 12.5' AVG Segment 2: Stal3+50 to 16+50 (300') Sta 17+75 to 22+25 (450') Totals Al =3000 SF Al =4500 SF Al =7500 SF A2=4500 SF A2 =6750 SF A2= 11250 SF Bcut= 31 CY Bcut= 21 CY Bcut=52 CY Bfill =64CY Bfill =45CY Bfill= 109CY C= 127CY C = 191 CY C =318CY Segment 3: No Impact Segment 4: Sta 14+25 to 14+33(8') Sta 14+75 to 15+50(75') Sta 16+75 to 17+25(50') Al =80 SF Al = 750 SF Al =500 SF A2= 120 SF A2 = 1125 SF A2 =750 SF Bcut= 0.03 CY Bcut= 0.14 CY Bcut= 0 CY Bfill= 0.88 CY Bfill= 18 CY . Bfill=42 CY ' C= 3CY C = 32CY C=21 CY Sta 19+50 to 19+75 Totals Bridge Construction Al = 1330 SF (Temporary Impact) A2= 1995 SF w`� Bcut=0.17CY G`" Bfill = 61 CY 'k CJ` C = 56CY \0' Segment 5: No Impact ' ,i\..., Q Segment 6B: No Impact - • • Seeded with Native Grasses and Planted with Native Shrubs to Cover 30%-50% of Area footbridge —.0----6- - `� _ Native Willows Planted . / ,-�_ •�I� Along Bank of Creek CI et„. ,._..,..,..... o • e ., . ,� !% if , . /44.t' ,i - 1. -.-e. u- ,, -. - , • . ... . , . ... 4. Western Red Cedar ,- ......■, I # zil)r f L ,..:m ,fil e. ........_ 9‘.., :::•••' ,4„:".4', / ,,,■,. /0101- -.'-'''' - • - -V / - • - ,,,...-0 1r ir Oregon Ash y 2-:,,:t4,----. • i .( ,s:-/7� / � � ► ;� J� ! e 1A _shy-�`® Existing Ash Woodland //" C, 18 ' ��1�4 44:y. *' , , 11.,,,:o, • ,it .' . , .,,,, / q ! - . . �,� _ > Eradicate Blackberries .411- in Restoration Area / , s co J 0 north / Fanno Creek Vegetation Restoration Project City of Tigard May 1999 (Figure 1) no scale • ar Seeded with Native Grasses /�' / 1 ✓ `Y 1 and Planted with Native Shrubs �'` �/l ( l /v. ._. • to Cover 30%-50% of Area 'km- - ..or Creek Fanno ! � .ems! /�/ Oregon Ash ' I i"4,07. \vii . -%(ti: "11 i Native Willows Planted ;/�:∎ , 1"‘- % Along Bank of Creek I,// ' 411 44,///� / �� ��+ _,701 Eradicate Blackberri in Restoration Area elf i( • ,cN ,, \ 1 • //�� ) !;�! Ponderosa Pine IS 4 . or f '(- • /`' ■ ' 4-,,N • Black Hawthorne Ni■ \s\ . ■ ..„ fee • . , •AVZ7r .1- , NI 4f. •!* Id , ' N-.. ' , Pl‘tp __-..:.:.kif e,,,,..;f,l, .wm.. . 1 • \ .s. .- i _I .. 4,44411.- 4. ,1) ',I — - ,l 'Existing As Woodland A. h \I� �, � fi. Atei L �/a ed 1.- ;iii;'•• •••• -• • .,�''�: 1 •�d1�f lawn • a Douglas Fir liN - • l. � . , n Johnson Street Apartments 1 Fanno Creek Vegetation Restoration Project City of Tigard May 1999 (Figure 2) :c',V..r no scale yid • 1111 !fi '1! awns 11i1 MU MHO #fol 0�a .u■..■g�♦♦'■:_►♦��. ..�.IV ass � � � , m • i*S■h 0 fit■--�I- v *aIlrl rd'`• ■ M=`1 C ■� ��• ' Ii.� .s■-/11,i�i,■■■r= 1'i.1a ItiI■ �5 C `� I I ..I=Biqa a1 = I!. .■ fl■ i & pi�V w•It�■ all∎ ! i mum I Ilin q---j=............■.■ ■� �' �_ 91 ` si,�s111./��1 O■0 . , A LIE 1111 mum*owe= -. .hi■' ■a Inr ■ 1 IIIF Cil:1!: , aI. ; i mE� ..■► Dy r■.�■�.1111 V J■ .■. _Th■:,►• if 3'.._a� %'�,1, k I., _•■■11111: ■u • t,• �... 411■la 111 _IMPAAP•I� _ � P.u._M :- 4, -111111111■IEI 4 iI::∎� 1*1I oino # I ..._ !!1 -- ,~:�C1111�■ ,3 ;- is %► ,�, � -••����:� :Oe�' �♦� F�► ,....lionnINim moat lin vfimi ■1 a ,k:-• , I♦♦ 10/ ♦ 4•♦� 1 a jp . ilaimi fi L - _N so k•1Mo; :: • • •',�1 NIII 111 or � :..as■1010711 011111p14 Ivai�■ ter �1 ► • 1 `01 <.� <•� � e� �I :;..;:� ■ m 1111 sir . ;4-4.. 44 ,,, v .... „ .♦, ,,jam is���� �'=G�,=��Tamp *w4 . gyp 0 ♦ �. 1 v ♦ ,�� �'.''„,„•4, ,,v ■ * 4 lif r. ■ IA Ili SAW itiAlillr■00',-,13114 44 44 1• X imam lona ri,.1, 4%C.1► ra A:t r 11►►,i,••••■11111:I ,',may �� -,���,i+. 4,-c,1.Ci�i1 �_�• - ��a.11111 ■Cm,,��.►.► � �.♦�:r:� ti+�o ' !34 ►404►„,,r• j∎►����: :♦ �r ■..1111■1111■/ ■■■t■■1111■_� `i . s$*.y 4 040♦' 1••��• ee♦ 111 1111■•.i ,11111111■ 1. 0NI •/ # I I ” ow r ► • ♦ 11 .r or-1111.1 1111111111'�c � • Amilmimprom 1„,r, divi lir_mug rut ii, :Ea Nal 2:X Milli LI 11117AME goo Noi Es ‘ +4,,,Imummossl. IL.es It Tar- £1.! I IiIMkj! ' .mo�■� �\� .. I 1 1 _ ■■1 • Ala=trr♦ - Conim pity Development SITE MAP • mi NUR= mit,EL• ME ill A 8111114■1 .11,3114111 1111111m.lair"r, . a wiry,: Aa LOMfTA lzt*A1111■ Ihriam - (.1.,-,,- f— tea� � _� i r , mpl . .,,,,.::,,.., ,Aln- 1- mow aril 2-'-'' ANEW 111111111 MEADOW �' . 404'1: ..■■Z ■ ICI s „skv<it. , #4*4..1 ,-: *--.:-/I*;°,',„ :,: „ 4„ „:7::: , ,:,,,,,,T,,:i:,:i.„:„-,-s-'-') fn. , ,,„,. ,,...;.;:_,,,,,..,,,, . it 4ip p,s4111 6.....40 pm*.rookiii:4-.A''''' 41 4,,::4,:,,,,,,,,,/,,„,,,,...44, 4, „i 5,-; ,I.,:7,,,,,,i,iiii.,:14.1., sillsimil ilairill. , sq4 I hy 9Lv k 441,14,**,,,,,, ■47 illqiip S ii7,4?iiiiiIiIF ,,, ,,, • irjillisillialli11111110/11 r Alb*P4'4 .*#4,4. ! N'44 %1 464''''',,:fP.,, , ,,_ .#410' 11. *Ab#4.b# ,,,, ,,,Asimilr ‘.. * 44., IFEIP.F'''‘,0, INIWk . .44 **S4 # 41 oft: ' ilbk. ilk 4iit Lail Ila III ma" ■ .� ■ WAIN.. .,. t , 41,t,<L,',:::-;':'°°.:;414 . „ .ill III-.:icTi ■∎ i ♦�. % Ate.,!�.. ....e„,,, ■ :11.■.1114 • : � E tin Nam ittifiac....__,.._•_•_rte aP ,� ♦ • #iii N ♦� S '�� :'._ �• s 4 * * v-v• I 1 . ....._ IT_ g •P-01614...**0% ** •4*. *- 4 )imi gum 111 I i tt* ■ , , --/ASsoilsr,A4141lar moilimilvr Community Development /114 6 p ,c ,„..,itj ,7/ 4 e-- ���7,-.„. , / � Q.- a C.,... ,C� 4 '-1. A' • • • ,-... 10' MIN. 6" CLASS "C AC — OR — 3" CLASS "C AC ON 8" OF 3/4"-0 • -.0--- 2% SLOPE TO STREAM -I11 o000 00 0 0 000000 oIIIIIIIL 1 1„1 1 1 1 1�1 1-III—III;i l 1-11' ------'—=111E _ -'I I III E II=111 1I1 COMPACT & STERILISE SUBGRADE I FABRIC MAINTENANCE ACCESS 5' MIN. 2 1/2”/2" A.C. 4" OF P.C.C. ON 4" OF 3/4"-0 �-- 2% SLOPE TO STREET .11=111=1 I I— � � III=III=III- =HIE-11 ��/ �I� 0 0 0 0 a 00 0 0 I I � —III— '11, �111�111= 0 00 n 0000 00 11-11 1111 II 11 4" A.C. FABRIC PEDESTRIAN PATH OR BIKEWAY NOTES: 1. CONCRETE SHALL BE 3000 P.S.I. AT 8 DAYS, 6 SAC MIX, SLUMP RANGE OF 1 1/2"-3" 2. CONCRETE PANELS SHALL BE SQUARE, 3/4" DEEP SCRIBES AT JOINTS 5 FEET APART, EDGED ON 4 SIDES AND HAVE A LIGHT BROOM FINISH. 3. FABRIC TO BE A WOVEN GEOTEXTILE (AMOCO 2006) OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4. COMPACT AND STERILIZE SUBGRADE. A APPROVED Br. NO SCALE AGUSTIN P. DUENAS MAINTENENCE ACCESS OR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DWG. NO. iiwi r� 13125 SW. HALL BLVD. Or MOWER _alli1 9:2" MARCH 1998 PEDESTRIAN/BIKE PATH an or TIGARD FAX 1503, 681-7297 16 6 CROON APPROVAL DATE "NOTE' LI 1 t ' /5/6•ban Rod 5/e'Yon Rod I 1 --__----y.-�_-�__- _ 5/0'bon Rod pi.aatridery W r Z 1 w ;,�^` 1 • Cirri Table 1 CIE Marker I wI.No yam GU xva:..pq ouv Tangent(IU I I 1 0 7156 1100 SIX'19• IS00 1 I • t 6'OeF I I 1 I EM TPne. 0 2]90 1100 7/7e',9' 1134 11.46 100.011 571 r0' 5.74 I r .' 1) � 'as 111• t i � 1 904 F, 1 CRAYL 0 ,4.66 e,.00 7°•u'Oe- 61,n 1 t 2.1vr%0/SeeeP9 ' 1 g •. g L ------------I () 419] 04.00 60Srt1' i]ss I To Wt. K d d. Reraw Met I I I ems. 'y I [.ktinp Ag1.r1 rn4 AC -i rt DI+A 1 14••�.. ' . W.e' ,'�J 1,e.50 ,6100 34RS 9• 0,.94 1 SW W I NO ROTOR _ y 11.67 100.00 sn rl5' 5.4 1 Rin-154.0° 1 KM0Er Ogn '' •:� ' -iti. o • • _i ooY r,�cOReelt 1 SAL n,B°r v ' • ,c t>Awl ar.a.ara. ems_ ___ _!:"`_,=``1►: j Stern OreF w ��(1 I f Slams P e' S!` �- `\-1/1,1', Rm-160.e1 OA I • PI I I RF.-,sa,os .� • 5 .. �e R..Ir. `\ •/ --- DAKOTA rEAOOrs sveaM9w 1t/'1' t vet Won Rod A.- Planted •4..b _, $ I r Trees � 'j I +r0^ , �e ,\ lb ,/0 Iran Red 9t Tear 1 Ii it EAR 1111v /�,, 9 ,� ~b p ::::_/.1 E-156.-04 4 •t. r/MO YaNe ilanr. r ----:izi -------- y• Y 1 r.+a O�\`�a g -----1.--- --s '+rr<' I r.... ror..d : i I I t 0175 �"\, \ O I 'OEA Centrtl' Dad 0 '� I 6'Oak \\1 ♦ 9ue(f 1�{1 Protect F Plan I I e I I. I (�'1J .�. _---0_-_ l 11 ! fhVrb'llr • 9 ^/11^� s0' .\ ■ ,Y(a)m` "' �� `` -..--* - (--I ). : 4:: 1 16.ems•Rat 29901ef 10' A_�'�`-..-3q�`�ynp. �\\:�� _ ��•mb�;ld Patn-a Ce te1M Y a' ..o.t and .., . • ,6'(7);(i)144'e g•` `try. 1 t ../ I4•Y4M T IDrat ' I So r..y ,r n 4. y' 1 aI s 6] Wetland brood ofUF 50'BAN I I I 1 1 II 1 1 1 ■ •r- , -__-- Drat u I if 1 !I_____________ r4 of _ P t aF. se.,a • Beet ' I 1 tarp • PATDA9 1 _-__-- OITEN . 1 7s s y --- -- I f I r Y 1X/55 C(AC I� ' BtY16r1 ------- --------, \ \ ' ------ 5/.•1\non Pip. R w-7t aiOPE 7R , I \, ,0. I 1 Scant r-NT 1�1 e'a 3/i-0 I/2-ban MRod NOTE: 91 fe.ce and bb-et9 rob W N.toa.d aleq Rood \\\I ( I r/RPt Monad • Um Ple and IN.!structures r.tId 100, 11EA Control' ABBREVIATION to provide adequate maim contw b l 1�4rr�eer.����� 5rrryy�..�1rf�yy, o..pn}aL Nat11 .✓® MP Edo.01 townonl R/r Rionl of tar 11/11PC rRn Rod Plaolk C4 1W/WPC Win Y6b-Plo.tk Cop FANNO CREEK TRAIL — SEGMENT f `. fe YAMNIE T.MOURN A APWML 100'NORTH Of SW TKIARD ST.TON NORTH DAKOTA• Ora•MmiC 0.00.0. •Lt a/Lk, LAYOUT 11, ...foe an,OF ,1GIYW ERDNEOwG OEPRRINENTI RE R0. 700 09C RAPE: ME' T,R TU NO,t1.i°wAS aroaN �Nm_. 11{ °° .bet. I re hZ-ar ISPS6-03 “Anw-11Menr...0As,TC I L1 • • I{{{{{�� ..:'N \\ i v 1fEGN'GF vL5 99^.' Foot P4M -\ 1. 1%1 k i 6oc,VL `FV.I✓Sd,� - { - 9 S �11 I FIV6 ELW s'y♦1 I�7a;:.'� •6 •OrCCO It I1 ` ..y� \ ,�• I ��vc SCvc��Ee�i 10.6' ��� yr:•.� .UEA COry IROL{' P.�- (�n�� �f - - _� ?GEAV CON R•OL" Rl.".• �.•. •� I r•w x- •.wa•w E. 1 r. ��/� • ;DY 7... .. .y - i I,cn Ree,/..4 Tq 00 I • Construction �,n • 0 c�- O a 4 f!1 O l 30' PoN C�.tsIM •••••„..... \ 0� ;p • • e will- 1 652146.3174 ]615154.469] _ ` .->„:„....e. + �� 411 fitness ,arse (1 .o' 1 a I 1 :7 1515 469.de �\ � 5;9n ),\...,. o o ; --- .____ ; I ,,��1 ; \ i 1 I \ 1 I Top el 11ent '�__ I /�\\ \\ 1 • 1 `\ I I // f-�� \ \ \\ COMP T�19 111 P I I I / ■ O 1471 10.00 m-7}67 LBO 1 1 pp I % \ +\ / \\ \\ i! 17.7 00.99 70-47-13 7.09 .1 '7 • \\ I y \\ \\ 57.09 74.00 44-17-13 30.05 ! I g I I I I 117.56 1x.00 46-06-09 5665 I I 1 I „ I \ I. 2(AA 5000 2}t9-OS 10.7 Z - ./6"Ircn Rte I \ 171.16y W \ \ 790.7 15000 96-77-01 19561 • /7PC MS 25 \ \ *117 100.00 30-51-34 27.60 of I i+t.� OBEC PLS i5s- I I 1 L1 42.17 100.00 70-09-x 71.40 \\ `l I I 39.77 nao 9o-oD-0.6 2206 44iyY I :�� C' -S KED \ x0.74 1000 77-19-b 1200 ,•! •1 1 1 ANANASNI BLS 9.. 1\ \' / / - 22.62 l 15.00 66-23-10 14.06 •Pt 1 I I 09■99>"I W/WC Mortee J \\ \\ / 6EG vL5 2554' 1`v 1 \ \ I / / ., 1\ I i •Pets*, \ • I I b ( 6"Ircn Fea, `� 1 1\ \\_ LEGEND 9 ''\\G „.4e: ' hE I ENNS•9n 1 • 66E0 vL5 • 1'_5, ■ ROW \\\`\\\ II.OWW*pod Mw •• 6 . 7;/.'grass • �` 1 \ \\ 4en 6 OE nGARD I \ \\ ®r.U✓M*wet*Ole 30 6e11■ • SURVEY CONTROL \ I_I� L L------ 6' .' I 6'irk \ \ TT•4y� g � j l 1` . \\. \ 11 .I ' j � 77.60.35 4.° ..' - . \ \ . ;. t.Bbl Pest.-7 ea 7 5EC//] GORNEVM CAV [ \ \ � 1 �:-p966• I UNLAWF L O ° `` \ O/RPC OMmReo \ Wei •7615726.1701 .. SURVEYOR 1907 �� \� ;UNLANFUL i0 DISiURD" /7 rp.Roe \ \\ T•P o1�• yam 'C l t EE0 35• `` � \ \\ \ P-0 ri`• 'u, r.�est..N AfPhol it• Z%.` \\ \ 9`11 R(„ ,erY ,� Non: sum w.l.l.0 a m sbectee es pee ` \ 9•,11`Y', \ \\ \ N I • MN Slsk✓e 04106 No.197.5 the 550.46* .i'0. . Peln \ `\ \\\\\\ �c�/ 'IN. /'°.ce RC- 0ete.a Poets INS D.P0Fb6.IN rb 07.0,1 e.] � 0..e*Its waa Pon ..Vs \ wq �'' ' gL,7 . • • 2.y 5' _Q Y 2.5 `\`\ \ \\\ \ I -- STEEL POST DET/L (0595.'p awes I ( r am.'r 6C �\ \`` - \�5.45 A N.T.S rW���iV•� L �\ �- 1 - lw°l•B"°'e✓ 6•OF,/--0 FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 2 .�110� MIMIC T.IIGIT[„P.L TYPICAL SECTION a,�,s TIGARD STREET TO TIEDEMAN AVENUE 63.0. _ - •LL 'ii LAYOUT `p �i4 CITY OF TIGARD cNONEEwNe 9EPN+TrwTl Na :906 I ore MSC I SOT CAL�"° 0160:41 I 1� �� I ��� �- „:\c„c\1999\r�wNOrsrtc L1 P ■ I I I / . / I L -I I / — MEADOW STREET r N C 651500.1365 I I I I \ E]]656119151 < \ a .w..E.I.t Ac / curve Table I I I I I \ I I 1 I 1 j. OA N.UN*(N Reba{N 01119 T 2(� 4 1 I t�`, S 0 21.18 to Izl Zl•ss' 17.61 ,tied C�iyj' / .y S✓y+� ., ` C c 0 1107 IS 497!50- 6.90 ——— Tigard Centre! ?$7' - '`�J — --— —_——_— 3160 25 6s7Y.Y- 60.09 I 5 li y ': Nobcao�d•o< It 1, Y °� O .6.155 25 6751'1.' 20.96 __ T t. .tlm,.l © lils a Bt71/C0' nob /� 95�� I- r� 1 (I 15.00 .sii PoNB Ere <1N�l I 1 Nit p�•HJ,,' V/TPC 4 r.ee a1 1-"'�'':1'9• 7P xe~tn.lner5�«t. ": -MEC Pt 1 - oat cemrmi e I id I II OF,�1 ——.h.__ \ 600 BE Metro Ave • Evc<r," c<r,.,,r<e.<r<„ �� 90 3w'd:n c<rn3fiz� « \ i drum.of 9nve1 \1 �lipr .o 9o`,:i <9iizi`r<m 1 1 5........../ai •1 vts COI �... •.tn�76 Cr�slms I �� I w / .'.\ \ I 1 _\ I o \ dd \ �o '/////�Pec'+�dr. �� l ap7�c.rlt.mP. ' <rd.<. 'lb Ccntrdl' xM b.Futon I �`�� ,az73T,o;',`..<sv«, LEGEND Mown Sv«t 1 1'¼i_irsiiit •• O 1 I ?� §a v,E 2'64" MI ` .r 6icc. 1 •i.oc rrer^,�� 5/6'.r rids I deer« »/Edda aerie 1 Gene Tor. _——_ corer,n \0. Cae�6en. 1 <_ \ ./G o e Pczt. har„e•,. E .0 1 rl,n�,q o y`cda°��L,n.; oee;rs.eeer.r is---------- i \ � 1 c o R..-z c jr n aed L'9 ' .Tit""'roopel i��— a 4,�,a c�co \6- '' .6 :7 Q !1. ►�� 4'.Pair P I.ao o,,,n•1 i � ,'; ;,' �► Eder- ^11r�� 0�1 «I. • ,.\I i B�fle I.�\ 1 PK✓o� i:Y AE.1e�1 9.9 ,• `\ •w �59A_ x'11 �{. i ,,I.- II 2.5 5. Q s. 2.5 ,1 0:°',.13., ,_ma �;\I` U j,[?4�-. E.bt.r9 Ground r I i �V / r •�V.:J <'..i _J Y :r .• I 1-ao«.e' eel 4x _ ��.,, V ,,- '" 7my.9oa yrwla4. 6,(7'.23/4--0 �� rMEE b S xutl-1/r-o'(7,01 F�NO Scale: Y = 50r \ ,ii TYPICAL SECTION x.7.5 y� FANNO CREEK TRAIL—SEGMENT 3 �°•+ '• mE �', ”, TIEDEMAN AVENUE TO WOODARD PARK 119 •Li∎I:i I LAYOUT .14 r.2 CM'OF TIGARD EN0MEI5x=wPM1YEx7 El8 x0. 260 I 09C 9090 WM x69EEEx Y.A-O9 MCC. �� w.n. I pi°'Q"�ROiO'" _ m f,',$` alms— x:\a.c\1999\r6xx01\SaE Li ■ • • I I \ • N I / \ � 1 1 \i l / cARo / / ST / \ 4211] / —� t� UM DorMYq Let q�b Vy `- ` `\ .„7, 7......„,.... ......7 / . / ,, ,, , 7----- 110," II/ � P \ ........%* 9026 5w i a 5l; R4now Ecbl r t....."•,........... / ` ///// ` _ / / ■ \ I \ 1 ~ \ �— � \i• � 4 ~� Exit Po,Kq Lot �1\ � /•1 ■ /- // \\\ \ FJ� �;� ;ifs. ,, 1 `"��__.�\ I /ARNO CREEK \ '4lj�l / / i EElD:::: // j ihwi]d BUFFER AREA \\ \�,..` i' t» / 4 /p S . .... .... "'- ir .' a• ••, -. .36 °° 1■474/ibt Lam/ p \ / • 2.3• 5• 3• 2.5 �i l• r Dialing Enna 'n� /,. . . rOOer AC • • ?x1 - is SECTION A—A /�/N • N.T.S Curio Taw. • cub No .rath(y Ras.(U %V.°(6 • Q 1513 50 1720100 7.92 © M40 so 332736• 25.29 Q 40.•7 50 552754' 26.24 O 50.56 200 1426.05' 2142 Q 116.61 200 3813.56' 61.27 - V 51.19 50 6571.56• 32.16 O 01.46 50 s60025• 20.29 FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 4 U 1533 is am'sr 6.63 _ WOODARD D PARK TO GRANT AVENUE A 10.06 10 6211.06• _ 1436 •1.IA LAYOUT `�,,1N• + CITY K BOARD ENaNEERWC OEPMTUEN1I FRL Na 260F 060 NAME: gaff 6 ACME GREGG. I°° °'^' I 0D F�' aF66- I N\N\1666VARNO\srtc I L ' i iV 1, 2 ...1,--,2"CMS / ,,,,,,'.'—'-'",//7 / /77 IP . // . / ,4 . \\\:".\ J yr,,4 \\ / votf lwT vvv / 7.3 Y „ •� Se' 1 Er.1ng Dowd/ / \ / Y Oaa-C K �.th ., c ✓ Q t s S / `�, o \\\ i 7 \-------.5* I e --uJ \-eya,.QOt.sore.. 1 e- ■■ / \ \ 1411)- µ--0-(TM ■ / \ f I ` \• 27Y ' x_v 55 Ill �',' ..\ \ �--\ LEGEND /N,gt aii il / ) / 0.,..\ N I ,/ / /-i — \\ NOTE: Steel poets rat w.on.t t.a..o., .- ............. end white Woes. It gO /4. op/ „..,.... \ .\ 00 % / /--- -\-_,_s_j \ ` __ \ 1f1 i 1 11 / / k \.\ ■, ) 1 / /14)). 1 ``\ \ /•`��/. / I / / .1. - / 1`\ \\ , \/,,,,..... „rl&....*Ikr • ` ,` ♦ • _.y� �` O 1 Cabling r.M. ,2•c a Pont Q / 1 \ II 0 \ \i)"\"`rte so / 4% t. c; _ End Construction I / / — To..t r 17+17.66 , i ' / / \ M 731)3)7.111 I T r so II FY.EWI K nw�4rc T.T. FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 5 Ns '. �' GRANT AVENUE TO MAIN STREET .i.lik LAYOUT . .� + If CRY OF MOOD ENGWEERRIG DEPARTMENT RE N7 37W 0MC MAIZE: ■� ��LL��... OIECOM _ 6 • • / ; til( / --_, / I ,,,,,,,,,. ._______/.._// / //* ..,.. ',.. '....... T ,- - _14„....„ ,...___.__7_______ _._ --—-R-./w .__ A EP ASH A ' / darker-i• 1 =ben+=er7 f`" / _ e. Svrodng 544.6.41 I 4 Instal St Pab a ptr ../ I a / A ` 6174• '//� "Steel pat Oetor-2 se I 0- 't� — Cures Table _ =� aG�� I o /i�/ ///_I//.///2 �•se!:� //JI/ / // I�i 0 I 4��/�IiS� G/%'i�Ill/ +I III// ff��If,e......_....., -,....... O 2166 50 2914•x0• 1112 9� ao.tu x5 66Yp•O6• n.1x �i` S•f 0 axes m 47']9'00' �i /�./ - -------- -- ----- ---- ��.,f. ��n.r sD lxvsr 164 \ �G�j�/� .--...910 -_ /' ( 92 5 mo.tr us 6- III/� "J �! R 0 229 10 11614.55• 16-06 8Bag, 0 U• ....... A‘ i 4.}„.E fi 7 4 x5 a• s x.6-• _•g4.'t _ r Oa.r AC \ \ a g r OF 3/4,0 Apvegate SneJa. TYPI/�Iy�]�� SECTION Yell-a/e•-Lr(T15) eo IL f-,s LEGEND NOT TOSS ® web.Invent"Nine 30•s.n. PY OP/■14667 50.00.K vY 71EV-14156 xiarK I 5- ¢ I PpNep7 162 1 :1 i �`' a• E �+ x 1 I ewms ova I I (:t.0aq ' ! 1 Poln.a7 Q 1 Po oo�. = 4 1 6 tl 2 q - a • ■1 1 4• sg3 �� �� � . —1— -a4oa 1 I 1 144 $o _I �}---1 __ da41q I V I I li 274• 9 { I 3''j I I tae x R `� a fa , 'p °1 .._•31 3 _3 a S 3 ROrz Steel poets rap a caneVeeled a _ Stsndrd Delea Ne.162 W Ow standard _ end W 11*S a{aided*Olt nd 10+00 11100 12+00 13+00 14+00 16+00 STEEL POST DETAIL aka$:11 • NOT TO SCALE ...1.4;''', .499E T.t10URR FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 6A e A ASH AVENUE TO FANNO CREEK 1.71.a MOW. '..',# • we�V•1.1-'HOARD LAYOUT& PROALE any f uom..11.ACM COY noA ERtA1EERWG DEPARIYERT RE Ra xaD DRD RAYS I�r. 1 al'''"" cars.u I IR‘nw11666\.ARwnSm I aL�l • • u Curve Table Olb > R Rod*(U *KO *Wile(N 1 '' 0 1176 19.17 4110'30' 7.20 Q 1117 13 3016'15' 7.04 O n.3. a 0511'04' 1183 1 Poln.a7 4 25.40 15 9790'53 16.96 \ 1\ E 0 42.32 ns 2195'05' 21.4 1 ` \ 1• 0 4' 1' 0 19.37 200 05'3739- 9.69 \ i See note See note \ 07 6.74 10 309526• 4.97 \ T\ 1 r rrao.e r.e 3. "� ►I cocem a C FENCE ON OTTO SORRG ' " " RETAINING':ALL 1 Y' A \ ' _ `\ 12566 5a!MniN � _�JL` .� —_vil \�---3 _�,y,!_`�l* 0 56� " '\ \---\a'OF 3/4•-O(A6) JJJ "' `Aggregate shone.. 6' Yell-3/4'-0•(Tp) ��` ` \ —/1.— — 10+00.00 TO 1+90.00 �' v'L►`a� �----— • 3+80.00 TO 3+80.00 o I• 6'COON ............. .....1461.111t 41/.NOT To v.I E` \ �► uN<FENGE� \1 11 Roth Nola 1 eitlU nor.*bun 10 to 6'ham 10F00.00 to 1M25.00. pp njls �,� ""--�,K "' Nee 13 \,1 2552 SW'MAIN 1 I II \ ( O a � A -� Waco..20'.301 14. 1 II �',\ _17• ���-"Wail'" \ 1 I lip grammar \ 7"---a.,_ S,- O 1• 1 it NVKi............,Iii , •od v.Edst 6ddge �I = 1 Roth Railing \ '!lq� .' 3 co per 0.tah,9�e� i �-Zx gape .1 \ .l/�. \ // '4� Ii— r OR 3/4'-0(A9) z ;000 uuiaiiurle� 12+80.00 TO 13+80.00 9f g7�� "'E°6 \ I ill" 14+90.o�N�5+19.9Q y'9=� o.0 / o I '\ End.�Nge 1 Il{hiii Tun a FFSNt llli ni iilim •�' Install Ie� is ' ' Fnil�a�iiiillliilli�li3s Iliiiilliliiil0 i�. as per 3Eed 1 y D.IaE Ns set No Moog � I WIN. b • greet es an " 1 Ph h it 1 i l / a o.lage(Itp) g°�B ;y W / \ I��\�dX8. 6 c9 v 8 6• �II J� ; I 6m� b =W k ' ,{ / I A-60v ELECTRIC I 1- _ hi / 25226 SW MAIN STREET ! >' 1 1 lit i 1 . _ 1CC / i I 8848 r gar I z_ i VI — STEEY,S MARINE 1 1 a ..?E S.,:L..'.AM STREET 1 1 NOTE: Steel aa pests Noll be nstrualed os pen Nolen I I Standard Delos No.192 of the Standord I. Set lanes Nog be placed Mang UN creek side Iv tN entire length of Um potty Deloh Posts Nall M gapped 510 red and uaund lee bridge abutment*motion Neoe. and*Ito tape In and altem5Ong palls... 2. Aponepdal•yes*control measure NMI also be implemented for the sloping area. ;,:,':. FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 6B STEEL POST DETAIL ..+ ., YAONI T.NGUYEN P.E NOT TO Scut Ob.mag e.m AT MAIN STREET — •ioapug •�u.^....� LAYOUT �.(®® )))�"' M.. WARD ENGINEERING OEPM YENT ru Na 260C mac NAY[ MET N.Y.=NEU MECO. leash w.. I 01011:018 Na«p. 02 I N:\ENG\1999nfANN06,SITE 1 L1 • Division of State Lands • Permit Noll) RF-16167 775 Summer Street NE , Permit Type: Removal/Fill Salem, OR 97310 Waterway: Wetland/Fanno Creek 503-378-3805 County: Washington Expiration Date: March 17, 2000 • Corps No.: 98-334 CITY OF TIGARD IS AUTHORIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORS 196.800 TO 196.990 TO PERFORM THE OPERATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED COPY OF THE APPLICATION, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIAL CONDITIONS LISTED ON ATTACHMENT A AND TO THE FOLLOWING GENERAL CONDITIONS: 1. This permit does not authorize trespass on the lands of others. The permit holder shall obtain all necessary access permits or rights-of-way before entering lands owned by another. 2. This permit does not authorize any work that is not in compliance with local zoning or other local, state, or federal regulation pertaining to the operations authorized by this permit. The permit holder is responsible for obtaining the necessary approvals and permits before proceeding under this permit. 3. All work done under this permit must comply with Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 340; Standards of Quality for Public Waters of Oregon. Specific water quality provisions for this project are set forth on Attachment A. 4. Violations of the terms and conditions of this permit are subject to administrative and/or legal action which may result in revocation of the permit or damages. The permit holder is responsible for the activities of all contractors or other operators involved in work done at the site or under this permit. 5. A copy of the permit shall be available at the work site whenever operations authorized by the permit are being conducted. 6. Employees of the Division of State Lands and all duly authorized representatives of the Director shall be permitted access to the project area at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting work performed under this permit. 7. Any permit holder who objects to the conditions of this permit may request a hearing from the Director, in writing, within 10 days of the date this permit was issued. 8. In issuing this permit, the Division of State Lands makes no representation regarding the quality or adequacy of the permitted project design, materials, construction, or maintenance, except to approve the project's design and materials, as set forth in the permit application, as satisfying the resource protection, scenic, safety,recreation, and public access requirements of ORS Chapters 196, 390 and related administrative rules. 9. Permittee shall defend and hold harmless the State of Oregon, and its officers, agents, and employees from any claim, suit, or action for property damage or personal injury or death arising out of the design, material, construction, or maintenance of the permitted improvements. NOTICE: If removal is from state-owned submerged and submersible land, the applicant must comply with leasing and royalty provisions of ORS 274.530. If the project involves creation of new lands by filling on state- owned submerged or submersible lands, you must comply with ORS 274.905 - 274.940. This permit does not relieve the permittee of an obligation to secure appropriate leases from the Division of State Lands, to conduct activities on state-owned submerged or submersible lands. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in civil or criminal liability. For more information about these requirements, please contact the Division of State Lands, 378-3805. Earle A. Johnson, Manager Western Region Field Operations ` Oregon Division of State Lands I_ • -1 : _ _ March 17, 1999 • uthoriz:I Signatu e Date Issued Salem\FOWo nsWuthonzation\Permit Face.doc • • ATTACHMENT A Special Conditions for Material Removal/Fill Permit No. 16167 1. This permit authorizes the placement of up to 544 cubic yards of fill material and the removal of up to 52 cubic yards of material in Section 2 and 34, T1 and 2S, R1 W (Wetland/Fanno Creek) for construction of a multipurpose pedestrian trail as outlined in the attached permit application, map and drawings. 2. Turbidity shall not exceed 10% above natural stream turbidities as a result of the - project. The turbidity standard may be exceeded for a limited duration, (per OAR 340-41) provided all practicable erosion control measures have been implemented as applicable, including, but not limited to: -use of filter bags, sediment fences, silt curtains, leave strips or berms, or other measures sufficient to prevent offsite movement of soil; -use of an impervious material to cover stockpiles when unattended or during a rain event; -graveled construction accesses to prevent movement of material offsite via construction vehicles; -sediment traps or catch basins to settle out solids prior to water entering ditches or waterways; and Erosion control measures shall be maintained as necessary to ensure their continued effectiveness, until soils become stabilized. 3. Petroleum products, chemicals, or other deleterious materials shall not be allowed to enter the water. 4. Waste materials and spoils shall be placed at an approved upland disposal site and not in any unauthorized wetland areas. 5. Removal of existing woody vegetation shall be minimal. MITIGATION CONDITIONS 6. The following conditions apply to the replacement wetland as described in the application and as depicted on Sheets 7 through 9 of 9 . a) The wetland shall be constructed prior to or concurrently with the permitted fill. b) The wetland shall be maintained as specified in the Mitigation Plan and as depicted on sheets 7 of 9 and 9 of 9 of the permit application. • • Attachment A RF 16167 Page 2 of 2 c) The buffer and wetland shall be seeded or planted with native shrubs and trees. Trees and shrubs shall be of the species indicated in modified Planting Specifications sheet 8 of 9. Following planting of the area, the vegetation shall be allowed to establish a natural character with minimal maintenance. Trees shall be protected with heavy gauge (cattle wire) to prevent animal damage The criteria for success shall be 80% survival for a period of three years. d) The issuance of this permit is conditional upon establishment of replacement wetlands of approximately 1.20 acres enhanced for loss of 0.30 acres of wetland habitat. MONITORING CONDITIONS 7. To insure a successful habitat replacement the permittee shall, for a period of three years, maintain the wetland until vegetation has become established and the area is functioning as designed. 8. The applicant shall establish fixed photo points. Photos shall be taken annually from the established points for monitoring purposes. A photo documentation report shall be submitted annually to the Division of State Lands for a period of three years after wetland construction. CONTINGENCY CONDITIONS 9. The issuance of this permit is conditional upon acquisition of the required Comprehensive Plan Amendment from The City of Tigard. 10.The Division of State Lands retains the authority to require appropriate corrective actions to the mitigation site in the event the newly created wetlands are not functioning as designed within a period of three years. 11.The Division of State Lands retains the authority to temporarily halt or modify the project in case of excessive turbidity or damage to natural resources. March 17, 1999 attachmentAwest\RF-16167.doc • DwIS)O e s,a:: tn`; JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM e lIllrmlmm."mmmm""mm • iiVii- I ry,� . I'�'I c: 1 THIS APPLICATION VNLL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF BOTH AGENCIES N c'-'R^1� Z ipi':Corps �j'" of Engineers •••.•- Portland District • T 8 s 9 AGENCIES WILL ASSIGN NUMBERS �/`/ Corps Action ID Number (98-334) Oregon Division of State Lands Number r� (� t 7 SEND A SIGNED COPY OF YOUR APPLICATION TO BOTH AGENCIES District Engineer State of Oregon ATTN: CENPP-OP-GP Division of State Lands • P 0 Box 2946 775 Summer Street NE Portland, OR 97208-2946 Salem, OR 97310 503/326-7730 503/378-3805 Applicant Name City of Tigard business phone # (503) 639-4171 and Address Attn: Duane Roberts home phone # 13125 SW Hall Blvd FAX # (503) 684-7298 Tigard OR 97223 . ❑ Co-Applicant Fishman Environmental Services business phone # (503) 224-0333 . ® Authorized Agent Attn: Mirth Walker home phone # ❑ Contractor 434 NW 6th Ave Ste 304 FAX # (503) 224-1851 Name and Address Portland OR 97209 Property Owner City of Tigard and Others - business phone # (if different than applicant) See Attached List home phone # Name and Address FAX # p PROJECT LOCATION Street, Road or other descriptive location Legal Description Segment 2 Tigard St. to Tiedeman Ave.; Segment 3 Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Sement 4 Woodard Park to Quarter Section Township Range Grant Ave.; Segment 5 Grant Ave. to Main St.; Segment 6b SE 1/4 34 T1S R1W Main St. South NE & NW 1/4 2 T2S R1W • In or Near (City or Town) County Tax Map # Tax Lot # Tigard Washington See Attached List • Waterway River Mile Latitude Longitude Wetlands associated with Fanno Creek, "4 miles N of North End: 45° 26' 13" 122° 46' 57" Tualatin River (Fanno Creek RM unknown) South End: 45° 25' 34" 122° 46' 21" Is consent to enter property granted to the Corps and the Division of State Lands? . ® Yes ❑ No Q PROPOSED PROJECT INFORMATION Activity Type: ® Fill ® Excavation (removal) ❑ In-Water Structure ❑ Maintain/Repair an Existing Structure Brief Description: Construct Fanno Creek Trail Segments - multipurpose pedestrian -bicycle trail Fill will involve - cubic yards annually and/or - cubic yards for the total project 544 cubic yards in a wetland or below the ordinary high water or high tide line Fill will be ❑ Riprap ❑ Rock ❑ Gravel ❑ Sand ❑ Silt ❑ Clay ❑ Organics 0 Other Borrow material free of unsuitable materials Fill Impact Area is 0.30 Acres; - length; - width; (11,250 SF in Segment 2 and 1;995 SF in Segment 4) Removal will involve - cubic yards annually and/or 52 cubic yards for the total project (from wetlands) - cubic yards below the ordinary high water or high tide line Removal will be ❑ Riprap ❑ Rock ❑ Gravel 0 Sand o Silt 0 Clay ❑ Organics ❑ Other Removal Impact Area is same as fill area (see attached Wetland Impact Area Calculations Summary Sheet) Is the Disposal area: Upland? 0 Yes ❑ No Waterway/Wetland? ❑ Yes 0 N Are you aware of any Endangered Species on the project site? ❑ Yes 0 No If Yes, please explain in the project Are you aware of any Cultural Resources on the project site? ❑ Yes 0 No description (on page 2, block 4) Is the project site near a Wild and Scenic River? ❑ Yes 0 No . 1 PROPOSED PROJECT PURPOSE & DESCRIPTION Sheet 0. Wetland Impact Area Calculations Project Purpose and Need: Sheet Index: Summary (Fill / Removal Calculations) Sheet 1. Trail Location Map See Attached Information. Sheet 2. Segment 2 Trail Location and Wetland Impact and Bridge Over Summer Creek Sheet 3. Segment 3 Trail Location Sheet 4. Segment 4 Trail Location and Wetland Impact and Bridge Project Description: Over Fanno Creek Sheet 5. Segment 5 Trail Location See Attached Information. Sheet 6. Segment 6b Trail Location and Bridge Over Fanno Creek Sheet 7. Existing Conditions and Proposed Enhancement Mitigation Sheet 8. Proposed Planting Specifications How many project drawing sheets are included with this application? Sheet 9. Digitized Aerial Photograph of Mitigation Site' NOTE: A complete application must include drawings and a location map submitted on separate is Y2 A 11 sheets. Will any material, construction debris, runoff, etc. enter a wetland or waterway? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe the type of discharge (above) and show the discharge location on the site plan. Estimated start date: early 1999 Estimated Completion Date: within 6 months of start date PROJECT IMPACTS AND ALTERNATIVES Describe alternative sites and project designs that were considered to avoid impacts to the waterway or wetland. See Attached Information. • Describe what measures you will use (before and after construction) to minimize impacts to the waterway or wetland. See Attached Information. NOTE: If necessary, use additional sheets. © MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION . Adjoining Property Owners and Their Addresses and Phone Numbers See Attached Information. , • • Has the proposed activity or any related activity received the attention of the Corps of Engineers or the State of Oregon in the past, e.g. wetland delineation, violation, permit, lease request, etc.? ® Yes ❑ No Wetland Delineation Reports (2) submitted March 31, 1998 and June 2, 1998 If yes, what identification number(s) were assigned by the respective agencies: Corps # 98-334 State of Oregon # ATTACHED 0 JOINT PERMIT App Y SECTION _ LICATipN FRNNO CREEK 0 and Q PROPERTY p TRAIL Tax lots listed in wNERS OF TRAIL November 16, 199 /S1 34 pD geographical order ALIGNMENT BY Tq 8 100 Tigard-Tualatin, beginning with the X LOT District #23-J n School District most northerly property. y 2S 1 3AA Tigard, OR 9Pacific NwY 101 J 23 Tigard_ v 2S 1 2gg g00 __ .._.T atin Scho°/. D Metro istrict 6�0 io al Parks and ,/2S 1 288 Portland GOraRnd Ave Greenspaces 8 832 City 97232-2736 13 5 S Tigard 2S 1 2BA Tigard, OR 9 j0 Blvd 340 09 Wilshire Rea/ Estate p a • erh'p 7fi S W R 9 n St #30OPortland j2 O5�2S 1 284 2 000 Ronald and Gayle 12345 SW Wicks 2S 1 2BA 150 Tigard, OR 97223 Ave ✓- 1 City 2S 1 284 1440 . _-------°f gT 2255 NW gal! N 2S1 2q Portland OR 9nson Ste #1 C 700 Do/an 7210 By Flore C o . LLC 402 SE g o k Dnlan (not in adjoining 2S1 2qC 200 P Portland, OR 97202 property owner list) Page Steens 9180 S Tigard, OR 97nharn Rd. (not in adloini ng property ° N4NNO.cREE 223 caner list) ovember �6, TR4IL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED /WORN/AT/ON Page 1 • • 2S1 2AC 1 101 Dave & Christine Hammon (not in adjoining property 3015 SW 116th Ave owner list) Beaverton, OR 97005 2S1 2AC 1100 Otto Sorg (not in adjoining.property By First Interstate Bank owner list) Trust Real Estate T-12 PO Box 2971 Portland, OR 97208 2S1 2AC 204. City o Bard 2S1 2DB 500 City ard CD Project Purpose and Need: The project is the construction of five segments of a pedestrian/bike trail to connect to the existing trail sections along Fanno Creek. The trail is a goal of the City of Tigard as outlined in the City's adopted Tigard Park Master Plan, which calls for a Fanno Creek recreational trail running the length of the Creek within the city, extending from Tigard's northern city limits downstream to the confluence with the Tualatin River. Thus far, about twenty per cent of the Fanno Creek trail system, consisting of six discontinuous sections, has been completed. The present project proposes the construction of five additional Fanno Creek trail segments. Recent City surveys indicate a high demand for recreational trails, and the existing sections of the trail receive extensive use by citizens. The Fanno Creek trail is a part of the four-county, Forty-Mile Loop regional trail system originally proposed in 1903. Project Description: The proposed five trail segments consist of a 10 foot wide paved pathway (shoulder is additional). The five segments are, from north to south: Segment 2: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (Fowler School Site) Wetland Impact Area: 11 ,250 SF (750 linear feet); 52 CY excavation; 427 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Summer Creek Segment 3: Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park (Woodard Park Site) Segment 4: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue Wetland Impact Area: 1 ,995 SF (133 linear feet); 0.17 CY excavation; 117 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Segment 5: Grant Avenue to Main Street . Segment 6b: Main Street South Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Total Wetland Impact Area: 13,245 SF (0.30 acre) or 833 linear feet of trail; 52.17 CY removal and 544 CY fill FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 2 November 16, 1998 • Three bridges are part of the project, and will span Fanno Creek (twice) and Summer Creek from top-of-bank to top-of-bank. For reference, Segment 1 is already under construction and goes from N. Dakota Street to Tigard Street. Q5 PROJECT IMPACTS AND ALTERNATIVES Describe alternative sites and project designs that were considered to avoid impacts to the waterway or wetland. Alternative sites are limited due to the intended location of the.trail adjacent to Fanno Creek, the location of the existing trail system, and the City's ownership and easement procurement. Segment 2, Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue, has unavoidable wetlands present. Beginning at Tigard Street, the trail is routed outside the wetland boundary and crosses the unavoidable portion of the wetland near its narrowest section. The trail then skirts the edge of the wetland and the edge of the playing field and associated equipment (fitness course signs, workout equipment stations, and ballfield backstop) and impacts only a narrow fringe of mowed and disturbed wetland: All Oregon ash trees on the north side of Fanno and Summer Creeks are avoided, and only emergent wetland is impacted. The bridge crosses Summer Creek where no adjacent wetlands are present, and then joins with Tiedeman Avenue to connect with Segment 3. Segment 3, Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands in the park as well as the ODOT .mitigation area north of the park for the Highway 217/Kruse Way Interchange project. Segment 4, Woodard. Park to Grant Avenue: The trail skirts above the wetland boundary where possible, impacting a narrow fringe of emergent wetland on the north side of Fanno Creek. Two Oregon ash trees on the north bank of Fanno Creek have to be removed for the bridge (please note that the tree survey incorrectly identified trees). The trail is aligned in an upland area on the south side of Fanno Creek and then crosses a narrow neck of unavoidable emergent wetland, avoiding forested wetland areas. Trail alignment is constrained through this segment due to steep upland slopes on the north side of Fanno Creek; the trail has to cross a back-water emergent area on the south side of Fanno Creek to connect with the paved ramp up to Grant Avenue. Impacts to the backwater wetland area are avoided by constructing a boardwalk bridge across the wetland area, with piers in the upland (top-of-bank to top-of-bank). Segment 5, Grant Avenue to Main Street avoids wetlands. The trail alignment has been routed outside of the wetland area; it connects with an existing concrete walk located north of Pacific Highway and north of Main Street. FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION . Page 3 November 16, 1998 • Segment 6b, Main Street South: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands, and a large section of the proposed trail on the east side of Fanno Creek was scrapped due to the extensive amount of wetlands present. A part of the trail in this section is a boardwalk, to raise the trail upland avoid excessive fill (in uplands) near the top-of- bank of Fanno Creek. In this segment, the location of the bridge crossing Fanno Creek was constrained by the City's easements on the adjoining properties (and by construction of a new building south of Main Street on the east side of Fanno Creek). The trail continues in upland on the west side of Fanno Creek to connect with the existing paved pathway. A southern portion of this trail segment connects to the Ash Street right-of-way, avoiding wetlands on both sides of the trail. Describe what measures you will use (before and after construction) to minimize impacts to the waterway or wetland. Standard best management erosion control practices (such as silt fences and biofilter bags, as outlined in the Unified Sewerage Agency Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans, Technical Guidance Handbook) will be specified in the construction documents prepared by the City of Tigard. FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 4 November 16, 1998 • ..ITY/COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT AFFIDAv i (to be completed by local planning official) ❑ This project is not regulated by the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. ❑ This project has been reviewed and is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. ❑ This project has been reviewed and is not consistent with the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. Consistency of this project with the local planning ordinance cannot be determined until the following local approval(s) are obtained: o Conditional Use Approval ❑ Development Permit �q Plan Amendment ❑ Zone Change ❑ Other An a..on tshas ❑ has -o been made forrlocal approvals checked above. �pp r i'�/ v • TIGARD /� !G _ v� 5 •Signature (of local planning offi•a Titl -/ City /County Date • COASTAL ZONE CERTIFICATION If the proposed activity described in your permit application is within the Oregon coastal zone, the following certification is required before your application can be processed. A public notice will be issued with the certification statement which will be forwarded to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development for its concurrence or objection. For additional information on the Oregon Coastal Zone Management Program, contact the department at 1175 Court Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97310 or call 503/373-0050. CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the proposed activity described in this application complies with the approved Oregon Coastal Zone Management Program and will be completed in a manner consistent with the program. NOT APPLICABLE Print/Type Name Title Applicant Signature Date • SIGNATURE FOR JOINT APPLICATION (REQUIRED) Application is hereby made for the activities described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this information is true, complete, and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority including the necessary requisite property interests to undertake the proposed activities. I understand that the granting of other permits by local, county, state or federal agencies does not release me from the requirement of obtaining the permits requested before commencing the project. I understand that local permits may be required before the state removal-fill permit is issued. I understand that payment of the required state processing fee does not guarantee permit issuance. DUANE ROBERTS PLANNER Print/Type Name Title Applicant Signature Date I certify that I may act as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. • MIRTH WALKER WETLANDS PROGRAM MANAGER Print/Type Name Title Fl $4,244 -Ay. Srvc4 . nfiblig Agent Signature Date irwr SUPPLEMENTAL WETLAND IMPACT INFORMATION* (FOR WETLAND FILLS ONLY) Site Conditions of impact area Impact area is ❑ Ocean ❑ Estuary ❑ River ❑ Lake ❑ Stream ® Freshwater.Wetland • (associated with Fanno Creek) Note: Estuarian Resource Replacement Is required by state law for projects involving Intertidal or tidal marsh alterations. A separate Wetlands Resource Compensation Plan may be appended to the application. Has a wetland delineation been completed for this site? ® Yes ❑ No - If yes, by whom: Mirth Walker and Stacy Benjamin, Fishman Environmental Services, 1998 (two reports): Wetland Delineation Fanno Creek Trail. T 1 S, R 1 W SE 1/4 Section 34 & T2S, R 1 W,NE& NW 1/4 Section 2, Washington County, Tigard, Oregon. Prepared for Duane Roberts, Planner, City of Tigard. March 31, 1998. FES Project 97126. Wetland Delineation Supplement, Fanno Creek Trail: Woodard Park Site, T2S R1W NW 1/4 Section 2, Washington County, Tigard, Oregon. Prepared for Duane Roberts, Planner, City of Tigard. May 27, 1998. FES Project 97126. Describe the existing Physical and biological character of the wetland/waterway site by area and type of resource (use separate sheets and photos, if necessary) See Attached Information. Resource Replacement Mitigation Describe measures to be taken to replace unavoidable impacted wetland resources See Attached Information. • Because this information is not necessary for a complete application, you may submit this sheet and other environmental information after submitting you application. • { SUPPLEMENTAL WETLAND IMPACT INFORMATION* (FOR WETLAND FILLS ONLY) Describe the existing Physical and biological character of the wetland/waterway site by area and type of resource (use separate sheets and photos; if necessary) The wetlands along the trail alignment have been delineated and described in the two wetland delineation reports prepared by FES in the spring of 1998. The two impact areas are described in this section. The northernmost impact area is in Segment 2, on the Fowler School site owned by the Tigard-Tualatin School District. The trail skirts a broad flood plain of Fanno Creek dominated by reed canarygrass and meadow foxtail, and crosses a narrow neck of the wetland that extends away from the floodplain area (this wetland neck extends upslope to the west, offsite to a wetland seep area). The trail then impacts a narrow grassy fringe of emergent wetland east of the school ball field and west of an Oregon ash wetland forest which is immediately adjacent to Fanno Creek. Part of this wetland area is regularly mowed as lawn associated with the ball field. Soils in the floodplain area were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silty clay loam, with no redox concentrations to 6 inches, over a very dark gray (10YR 3/1 ) stiff clay, with brown (10YR 5/3) redox concentrations to a depth of 16 inches. Soils in an upslope position near the crossing of the wetland neck were a very dark gray (10YR 3/1 ) silty clay loam to 16 inches, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations, and gray (10YR 5/1) depletions at 14 inches. The floodplain receives highwater over-bank flows from Fanno Creek and has a high groundwater table. The other segment with wetland impacts is Segment 4, north of Grant Avenue. The trails passes through an emergent meadow associated with the floodplain of Fanno Creek. The meadow area is dominated by bentgrass and reed canarygrass, and has soils that were a very dark grayish brown and dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2 and 4/2) sandy silt loam, with dark yellowish brown (1 OYR 4/4) redox concentrations and dark gray (5Y 4/1) depletions in the surface 10 inches. The soils had a compacted hardpan at 10 inches, possibly disturbed from previous sewer line construction. The second wetland crossing in this segment occurs on the opposite (south) side of Fanno Creek, where the trail crosses a narrow finger of sparsely-vegetated, disturbed wetland dominated by climbing nightshade and red-osier dogwood, with Himalayan blackberry on the slopes. The trail avoids the surrounding Oregon ash and red alder trees near the trail. Water quality in this backwater area appears to have been negatively impacted by trash and debris. FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 9 November 16, 1998 Resource Replacement Mitigation Describe measures to be taken to replace unavoidable impacted wetland resources The proposed conceptual mitigation plan calls for the mitigation of the 0.30 acre wetland impact by enhancing 0_ao acre of non-forested, reed canarygrass- and meadow foxtail-dominated wetland,d located in the floodplain area east and south of an Oregon ash wetland forest adjacent to Fanno Creek, on the Fowler School site in Segment 2. This provides a 3:1 enhancement ratio and mitigates adjacent to the largest wetland impact incurred by the trail system. The existing wetland forest area is dominated by Oregon ash and reed canarygrass, with scattered clumps of Piper's willow, clustered wild rose, and Douglas' spirea. The wetland will be enhanced by planting large Oregon ash saplings and Piper's willow cuttings, to extend the forested wetland area into the meadow area, and appropriate shrubs (clustered wild rose, red-osier dogwood, and Pacific ninebark) will be planted adjacent to the existing forest near the trail to provide additional wildlife habitat. The trail will still remain open and not obscured by the plantings (for security reasons). The attached drawings explain the proposed trail alignment and wetland mitigation plan. • FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 10 November 16, 1998 655 Lt. 625 .,moo !HWY ELROSE:91, gl n•'tt CDUN 9 Fanno Creek Trail Sheet of 9 Permit 11/98 u.un n SE," y tib 0 W .a !IA •4' "o ak .s a ` V .' Sheet 1 . Trail Location Map :'.•i�;I,h ,; *APr,-SwnF" ,4Agf.. 7r I .,,, 1 HHAM41;RUO 6F15 • • _ FANkfo CR Ci-rq op I ( p.: Wetland Impact Area Calculations Summary Existing Ground gm = Surface Area (not including shoulder) i Finish Grade \\ \ . ' = Surface Area (including shoulder) B = Softdesk Calculated Volumes 0.9167' 0 = Path Structure Section \ i)i 12.5' . F-- 7•,fir<f g.,,,T,_ - -'`./ ._ ,,")..-'. AVG Segment 2: Stal3+50 to 16+50 (300') Sta 17+75 to 22+25 (450') Totals • Al = 3000 SF Al =4500 SF Al =7500 SF A2 =4500 SF A2 =6750 SF A2= 11250 SF Bcut= 31 CY Bcut=21 CY Bcut= 52 CY Bfill = 64 CY Bfill =45 CY Bfill = 109 CY C= 127CY C= 191CY C =318CY Segment 3: No Impact Segment 4: , Sta 14+25 to 14+33 (8') Sta 14+75 to 15+50 (75') Sta 16+75 to 17+25(50') Al = 80 SF Al =750 SF Al = 500 SF A2 = 120 SF A2 = 1125 SF A2 = 750 SF • Bcut= 0.03 CY Bcut=0.14 CY Bcut= 0 CY Bfill = 0.88CY Bfill = 18CY . , Bfill =42CY C= 3CY C= 32CY C =21 CY . Sta 19+50 to 19+75 Totals Bridge Construction Al = 1330 SF • (Temporary Impact) A2 = 1995 SF Bcut=0.17 CY Bfill= 61 CY C= 56CY Segment 5: No Impact Segment 6B: No Impact 5 ( D 3 O tC1ZG-) /vTi4cL- t-I u-- C Fanno Creek Trail Permit 11 = 8�'i l l -1- C Sheet of 9 1 1 /98 ToT� F� aVPt_ = c_A,t = 52, 17 C`r "frilitifial�: r I � 1 I ii: • UOp a J , I o 1 ENCR PLS 990' • Boca \fola SoNaa e� ms l� ea1 r�ld�\ - -W/ �:,31 1). m /�'Iron R a ` `_ n' i '• Ipon aoa� •.�,. YI RPC Mork ,� PS I Co B.nl EA CONTR"l Wakoul /7 E9Uipment I 1 �'/ rq .• 'filnes7 I/' CONTROL Co"rs • S.. • Tf� 0 7 ,1 •nurse Si•n ° RPC Marked • • VEA CONTROL,' f � al C '•It 7 •fitne.2•.. rer8 n^r O o '- •D• -.. II■ �.• O o O " o-0- o Path rA t.�k. 1 I Itlt>!> 00 0' 0 d l N, 0\v_____ _ - war, y\le-TuNi) (IAPAci A 120A --1 , , i •5�\T�l, O iffri _ \\ I t \ \\\, I I I Tap of Bonk _i✓ /�\\ \ \ 1 % _ �� \\ \\\ Curve Table P •I 11 ' // /-- \\\ \� Curve No.L.ngln(Il�Radius(11) Data Tangent \ u.a 10.03 e1-23-5: e6o II \ \ 11 �� �� I \ \ 12.14 10.00 70-Q-13 7.09 I11 I III 1 • �\ I/� % 1 \ \ v 57.09 74.00 44-12-13 3005 lItji 0 112.56 134.00 4e-0e-09 59.°5 I 1 / \ \ 20.79 50.00 23-A9-05 10.54 �� I I �� \ \ 19161 rJ •C u d ' \ \ 29..14 175.00 96-22-02 2..tQ.°/pvP \ 5166 100.00 J0-51-14 I7.60 V I 1'OBEC Ply 1553' .\\\ \ I \ i .L17 100.00 2.-09-3. 25.00 11y W/AL C�u0 RKED \\ \�` ]9.27 25.00 90-00-00 kt I(I .1 VRAHASHI PLS 19.3 20.2! 15.00 77-194]8 12.00 Yl 1 t 1 fANN09 1997' I 22,62 15.00 66-23-10 1..06 I I I yy�� \ `�\\ \ \\ I , I 'OBEC PLS 2553' •\ \P N.1 k\ \ ' I I • 1 • LEGEND �\ 1 , �\ 1 1 'NARRQW 5/8'Iron Rod t I \ , \O -Norkery I BRIDGE Slgn WW//YPC uon.d \ �\ ® WUond Impact Atha ` te1 'OBEC PLS 2553' Bridg s I \\ \\ !\ ` .\ ROM I �\ \ Y�,1 i _ 2]/. Brae,cap •\ \ a��i(iiCi►i; Marked CON of TIGARD ` 1 1 SURVEY CONTROL \ \\ \\ 111 VNUIKUL TO DISTURB' .1 r(=' 1 \\ tee}\\ 2760.]5 • ` ■\ \ \ \ �� 11 Caul SIN Pat.-2 eo.\ Itl leISECTIQN CORNER `\� `\ 1\- \ \ \\-��. vep.i .E� � ]1/2 /a url CAP \ 'D A CON TROT' \�-_--_ 7°13726.1201 MARRK[[D WASH.CO. ` W 1[PC Morten Top a!Bonk � 7�I.1 AC SVR\EYOR 1992 �� I Iron Rod \` _-_ �\ ED 35' I., ...,,,,,, ,urMWNL TO DISTURB' --\ __ \ �\ .� 'Ieting A.pkalt Trod. . . .... \ \ ,\ IPLfilif IM:1 51 OS\\ \ 777 s/e'won Rod•ord •a 93.44 4 9.9i/.4 9o, PolN.oy mII.we./c Q \ enc. I ,, / ..\ Ng.• L5• 5• 5• 2.5 • \ \�iANNO�•-yy/ �q - L ailing,and Fanno Creek Trail Permit ��5`° ' --- 3'aoa'C 7 ,\ A ��z,•w `� ,. Sheet 2- of 9 1 1/98 ` �- 21E ■ gap.-�• >< y ._ s\ _ Aggrpol.SNwlda n \, • - N.t,-]/.•-o•(T,p> ° �'�`'-° fir" FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 2 • ,ae44.1si[k1 VANNIE T.NCUYEN 0.1.07.4 N ,GUY TIGARD STREET TO TIEDEMAN AVENUE °III' LAYOUT ,TYPICAL SECTION .•.il -�� N.T.$ '•1ti QTY OF IMMO EN,NEEmmc summon FILE NO. 260 OwC NAPE: MIXT $fAff OREl92N w a®r,.. ion and.Wetland Impact and Bridge Over Summer Creek �� �� I a,SST np.ey. e,� ,; pP16- N\CN0\1196\fANN02\SR[ 1 •1 1 1 1 , . I I . . ....-.----- / / / // _ MEADOW STREET — • I I 1 1 `\ Curve Table oed•• `.,iw © 1 I 1 1 1 111\ a ONO.L.7t 16 R) as 0(ft) 12121'99' ion17.et(R) . • b wfil ' I,��f�, 13.07 is s9se'so• 6.9e 0 A — —— Noe" P. Roni I_ `1\ a °i 0 78.63 25 7979.36' 1609 ,l�‘ No COP.40.4 • P. 0 3/,e3 25 )9'79'3.' 70.91 • • ,2`�,..:.- 12.00 43.00 an,n`5..o0 �———— tnv3 ——————— 0 36.19 _ a e2sroo•_ 77.06 o+i. ` 1- --1--g--I— _ 49400 .:•. _ °\6v q °� • ��1 1 1 1 1 , E Ial l Tre9 _or.n. ` 1 • I ' 1 i3).f. -/f'. .w tot NW,. : •j �i . .„,,,,,..v. I O /RFC Marta KaU.rIne Sines. FL{ 99,1• 1 ••.0.O.T.Gonave L 1 1 pi I 1 r� , Metro ¢ a~' ,I I R°a l k CKraline Everett 600 NE Grand Ave. I.IJ 110210 SW.OR 972 Slr.el 1 1 Secl'g0 Corn ro Po000nd.OR 97032 I ❑qad,Oa 9722)cqp}1/2 Co.1 2 7177 waan.C.4962 611. 9.y was m. -POI y B C....IY.. \ \y� 1 I —— 1 • Il\ 'O. , 1/ .d \ /$DRC Nar fairway N Gntoliw \` t!0 SEA C°nlyd" 1 \ JI� , IO200'SW Whirring TeD e/ ""� 1 \ BaM I I figad,OR 97223 • \\—"�I71 II,1 i3/Pen Red .le �� I L�— — I o.t 11 ?1114N�' o t ---Ili I I I I � g --- I I I 1 \ 9anitarrr , ye� I I Rim.l SO Q f. ,.I. 1 I I \ I I \ �_ -/ i— ` \ � . . n I 5/8'Iron Rod \ ` an k Assoc.PLS 2 67• 1 I \ \ �ie Y 81 wa! 1 ' I I \ ` INK�w.w�1 \��� `1 9/B"Irv.Rod 1 tin.Fi nc° :/ 1 Y e.ae r«.. v 9Pan.icnY I i 'DEA rwv! •. �` `' BO.E.D.Bent. I &qcY wa7 /0°ad Pmts ' I S.n(lar�• a• { Y. g -r y ./Crain Link r.• 7.-.° Ob7y L.vN lint'?0.61 r�R�° /n'99 :05.,71., �• L••bSign .d — /-- ••,•9.T,—• 1RdIDf- -4_1 ^1 _ �` 1/ PC M.M1 I •� t 1�+� V S�Iv °1�7wf,...� Jr.' 9. A Ca.vaw • .«.' 11(01 4 .>r-==�1•• t °E �*� .o v^ O �/ ,�� ��'>t1 ... °.,77.77 " I % \ fib; ' w � .i.na. y /' Lv aT•r rp.r. 8 I / 9..w cwdr. Po E / / , 43439!°na sna d / . S. 9' 212 1 .k.......1. q O 3..,.T7 16 al 7777 is 5155.—.. u i fr., / /I ���\`\\.. 1 1/ ^� _� t...9. / - /�� (\t\\ .tee RE // \ \toe 1 IS °•a 3/7-o \\\\\",�,—F�NN0 1 I \\\ Fanno Creek Trail Permit.__ �$=W TYPICAL SECTION \\�,��_�� - • Sheet a of 9 11/98 ILLS. - - Ak a, �� VAM FANNO CREEK TRAIL-SEGMENT 3 TIEDEMAN AVENUE TO WOODARD PARK �1 ...74:1,1:11 LAYOUT CITY OF HOAR) ENGNEERINC OEPARTMENT - �T RARLEEM M.AICIIELE OREGON a a®.a 177E NQ no onC NAME: Gn I IRM. I 00.49...0 ao..o.. $e•T. :• GPM- N.\aa11996\rAMMOS�srtt L 1 • — ?) of 9 / ". \ • / \ / .........\,.......... • r......... 1 ``` \ Sr• / J - EWl Parkig Lot bU \` / / / \ / / / / / / 1... • 4". i ET:�� ��� 1 Rx Electrank Xper SI �� / / / ♦ �\ Q 9626 SW Tperd SL F -J.-.......j , . ..,........1 / o I• \\ \\ 9 Sly .. t. CAW Parkin Lot 1L-.71 b >iya�` _ �� • \\ \ ., "I' �— -,. \� :ter -- �S / (2.141 O I FANNO GREEN \�` /'.�, \\ ` _ ;,:_,G3, -1 0,0 1 'i -----�\ \\ A / LEGEND j\ \Q �.� ;.. I 6,� © ivaond �� ��`p \\ . \\ o `a......�� 01111* 1 Al 1\\ `/•® AMMO IMPACT AREA \ .e • / \� �6tJ :p� 'a. 414 �v,>s . \,.. ...... „........, .v.\ ``� a I w '/ T� . ••.. ■. ------,-,.1 ,,,,,,a_ ,......,... ..*00 I.....dja* , . .--"----___,..," 3.;4 • 40. 1-V;X' f / V 'PoNw7 �� . 91 5' �, _ /nor . / is 3'aou-G' AC p Sao.-� y • ?. 'A^ . 4 r `r "` °' New Ca /t' ./ /(,,SECTION A-A Rca St 11°° Curve Table • —C.NMW i;. 5 0a9$o.t.•oth(R) Radar() Delta Tap.,t(it) O 15.13 50 171010' 7.67 . O 46.40 50 5527'36- 26.26 • . O 46.47 50 _ 5522'54' 26.24 ' 50.56 , 200 1429'05- 25.42 ' O Q 116.91 200 3413S56. 61.27 _, - 6 57.19 50 69131.59- 32.16 ppp FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 4 51.49 SO 59.00'25' 26.79 0.e+ol N•f VANNI[T.NWYEM A 15.33 10 erae'51' 9.63 • 19R + �,�,,,�,�, WOODARD PARK TO GRANT AVENUE _ 16.09 _ 10 9211'09' 10.39 .1ja1Q1 11 LAYOUT CITY OF 11GARD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MOLT • ItMItEN W AN21ElE OAEDON TILE NQ 260 DING NAYS: w I @� _°�'0 J "1°rto-or _ .._ _ .—F w. _.. __GP96- N:\CNC�1996\fANND4�3Rt LI / . 0,c7., . ..-.., ,,,,, , ,,,,,,:r„. IN.I5I 4,, ' 4(....V ,,,,li / / Yt 11722/ / is,/ ..„R 701.4.:..,,,,....mt. lira" ...., A 0 /• .V / / Fk s‘s,. V.404. '.. ss - ,v,"00".°'''''....y 41.iif I `• 9` f l'.t •n 1 End Construction• •....OM A So..,Y:.. \ ..l / 1)55..aw."P..,,. ',Y •« A 1 N 6$1237.9942 // r..Y.,•w 01210 ./.rc M. • 1 C 7616237.1143 'a.c« I Join(tht Co..<PotN / 1 // * 1 S I 1 al ,1 /// : i1--1)1SS".M9w 1 fj.4MS1i73 Y......».U.. I 1 5521 wn..[f.w■twin 1 OR fn. • /' I 1 • Po1n.*7 I E / t ' S' S' 23 /, 1 , A.i.w. Y a*..•C• 7 // 1/i'.»••• 1 •M.,.0»f 1111 WI. ./a.c»vY' / a 1».Mint. rs sap•—� < �•� /�a.....a .Q/.N) �� Vhwiu.t�T Settle: 1• = 50' / j it M'+t. ' / . SEC TIONsc A , iD, a )� i ,1� r»...N E»w._, • 9.41 lu ra.US / \ • / // Ak'y /mss.... Fyy �` /� /.1. Curve Table / 4. /` 7r•04 ta ) C. 9«a _ / ' ar.1 Curb No.length(N) Radio,(It), Dolt* Tangent(It) /� r. `� /' M.«M».�M/ "••�sv O 15.71 70 9O 000 taoo Q Y•t 0 ' 15.73 10 9000'00. 10.02 /" 4' ./ �� b...t!ien, �\` 0 6129 73 493744• 34.66 / r<Y' �••"•1 O 16.46 23 4216'40• 9.67 / // �� « • 0 31.53 75 2406'I3• 16.o1 / ,-/ S�� ems.'% 0 5160 75 4105'45• 2015 - / / // �N ■ .,n•,t 0 3156 2s 6,3006 - =1.54 G'. '1" °•6^•t• SA.Roo;a• s. Fanno Creek Trail Permit 13 17.94 25 4106'24' 9.37 5 Y...Rf rw.' ,— t Sheet 5 of 9 1 1/98 ;. vANNrc T.IICUY(N A FANNO CREEK TRAIL-SEGMENT 5 000(1..14.401 1 , GRANT AVENUE.TO MAIN STREET ■ MIMI •u '11 LAYOUT an aF �GARn . OP, (ARILCN Y.A,CNEIL a9(OON ENG91EOM to owl OM fa(N4 290 0Y NA0 MT • I' NA . I o*.ca.c c*..a,. -m . ana- t. N,\ENG\1144VANNOSVIT( L1 • :rve Toble r.0) olio howl(0, 19.17 1110'50' 7.20 1 5o16'1Y 16.9 • 11.79 7733x3' 9.53 15 9790'SJ� 16.96 ' 115 21136'05. 21.10 ■• S'WOODEN • too 05'3t59' 9.69 ,�� FENCE ON OT70 SONG 10 5095•x6• 167 �' RETAINING WALL 12566 SW MAIN o7�io � \ 6'CHAIN ` amp i• LIMN FENCE '�/ ' • -03`\� .*0 %..,i ' OAVIO.CHRISTINE HAMMOND i IxS62 S W MAIN i g.= . , a E.—, m r W _I`. T End '..T / i If"1 Pathway \ ® 8 111 9'-•9 A. r or 3/1.'0 �. )....---.•r'---t----------------,--- ._____rh,■r/ :✓=�%� �\P.-- ""falli 2 I \-- --...-., ,--.,-....exx..... , � _ 1 o �__Iri� R ■■r���• I I- 1 o I w n+WAY Eosenanl 5 71111"..1 I N 1' I I I1 I 1 I 3m_ I I // I OOLAN 6'COMPANY INC. T / A-003 ELECTRIC ' I / 12520 SW MAIN STREET U) 1 •6•Out Lan I I S6�kE:—two' I " =1101 • • 111 / PAGE N.S1E‘ENS . 1 Pier i STEVENS MARINE 1 • 9180 SW 6MRNNAM STREET I `-E•,.+q Ground Fanno Creek Trail Permit Sheet of 1 1 X98 •TION B-@ FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 66 ` « ,,,,,„,„,,,,;•, VANNIE T.NCIMN A„o......11.C. AT MAIN STREET LAYOUT ,LLF"I iI «:a C1 O 11CARD ENGINEERINGOEEPARTMENT ITT GARGLES M.AICNEEL OREGON w a at• nu N0. 260 OWG NAPE: lion and Bridge Over Fanno Creek i� ..,. I �. «. �� � ;; arts- w\c11c\+ne\rANNOgsrtE 11 EXISTING PIPER'S WILLOW FOREST ■f;!. / 1 I 1 ,TECNCEw4°°1 990' jpek``,.J f- 1 o UPLAND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT AREA j� 1 / Doe field Yowf,l xh�, /\ + A W 1 —_ f_ ` oil = I. Oa Me } m s Odl i"d0� S/ll'I.en Roa /_ '� em'�� R° WETLAND SHRUB ENHANCEMENT'AREAS n, PS /Na` awn, R°y k Wvkoul , • EA ONIR•L w PC Yo.0 Cows • .,• Equipment •� / ° L!, Caul rae7 Sin UCA CON IR� , (970 ill. • ,L I ,� K- ` W�RPC ua kea 1 F.k J/�� � \, it, V —�_� 4A� EA CONTROL •ens,-.,-,:�„_ LI .._. • gVbmM1 \ F�^-+ 'w/ �I.,�.---_I/�„,.., "y_�,, —���/�AT�i/� d i �: . : 6 O ° A' OA A6 /C��p,g • ` P°U Centerline . O ` ._A:‘,... ���1� O :na 4 � 0 a ':i\ `� •.;��— ��1 r EXISTING OREGON ASH FOREST //SAAAd�+� ' -7--,o. •(:n,I o - /1 PROPOSED - yl p J �1 ' -------- _\ Iz 2G 'l I I I 0 j 1 , /— OREGON ASH w ! r ,��, I A �1 Tap Sonic =--. / \\\ \\\ FOREST ,w P \ \ 1 1 //////c------( eoN C ,a / I s \ \\e\P \ I 1 ,� 1 \\ \\ ul I�I 5/ Irw Red I \ y; 2,4°4 \ (1I`\ 1 1 I S/E'IRON R00 •ODEC PLS 2557' l CC Sly W,If(//AL CAP PARKED _: w 1°t I I 1 IANRNO9A1997 LS 1945 \\ \ I / I �1, vs. \ I I I 1\ \`\ I / 9 5/B Yon Rod A\ •I \ \\\ J./'.' •• OBEC PLS 2553' • \ ` / I •P Noi•\, \ ` \, \\ ' 11 LEGEND \C Ya.kerl • ,BRDCEQ'NSgn 5/ 1 W IcC uoh 0 / I .\\ ® Wetland Impact ANN �� --_-- 'OOEC TIM).\ addq` ROW \�\ �� 1!\ 2 s/.•s,aee Cep ,� `� \�\\\ *!!i -'3 ; y. uahea a y c-TIC o UNLAw CO DISNRO' \ \\ ♦ \\ rS� , `\ \ Op \ \\ W\• [ 271!0.33 \\ \ I CmeL SlN Poele-2 ea. `\,p \` �L�i ' 309Be 9�` , illit 1r 7613720.1201 I auioµORNNUU CAP `\ �\ \ `'D A CONTROL- _—_ �-.— —�� 1 J • 'SP'11C YA0./K[D wASN.C0.- v\ .j w itvC u°.tea \_ �\ Top°f Bank 'I Ep y5• SURE TOR 1992 �� 11 Iron Red —� \ , _.•� 7{- UNIAMNI TO pISNRO' I}- `\ �� `1,... .4.7.- Ielinq Aephoh Trail �\ P2R *1rD4'(()�/'^�'(�'�'� Rim 1l\�_V�/ IY.15 \ \dd , •I:eraPathway I 1 I�L` Ind �e°rnae°�ac, E `\`� `\ \ J _--- i5. 5•, 5• 2.5 '\ ■ \\ '744610 :.�7/ m � - `\ Fanno Creek Trail Permit SIT, I M. 3'aan•C' AC 1 1/98 ��:ti�:.. \ Sheet �-of -- d�o Z9:Sow 7: —r. 1. a\ Agq.pal. I''.'2dw 5.a J/A--o '”., rn • A FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 2 call-J/A -0'(Tp) �' ' 4 a1Kf YANNIE T.NCUYEN TIGARD STREET TO TIEDEMAN AVENUE ` 4ya• �``' U..m..�....01 1V 11,1M TYPICAL SECTION g llyED 318.9 ..i. =n LAYOUT Id Proposed Enhancement Mitigation N.T.& cd4VJ ..,° .' au Of TIGARO CNONEERINC OCp�TYENT '� a � y0.E 610. 260 N.�CNG���rANN02\SRC 1 L1 JOITIONS AND PROPOSED ENHANCEMENT AREAS q(� S`•y �"`� I p.p.Kw•n°o.lo.. • ._._ . - --. • -449 .1 i..'r=''>'a""'^r' 1:4 :11-"-i r. '_',•''�_..:.-..`1 c 9'+�.. `I..0..:.'•:_i-;F'i.t3+.-cJ.-,.ri'}•.J i.,).,..8a..y`�;rt tJ l:-z t�.J:t-:T.e`l g•'r'r-y~..Y',l'r':T.-a,.;�...,ti.'.-cy.r�:3 M!'w y r'n-"'.iX t-','r R"'G`6+.�`.�r 2{r.i k- 1', `..-,r�-•�7....,.44.t"'1 s'4.-$}E'y,�`r..`n r�,V",'r c-t'L.-„r.••7`r p-.+�'.jr t�.-,r 'v,i3:,r,Y 1i,-�-,��,.�'i)r>d?ir_,.r;.;''.. .T.rI;..+',�'.�...J,”._t�,r#t-µY.`\,•-?.'r.:.s-:... .�w��w -'.3"ty a r r^.I_"T��a'1-'r•,'=sya-.....°r L.�da(sat`y 7*.a ' ' r a a l / F ♦\r: v '•.C.:,'y' '• • y wQ,' 4 .e' � OCOOnA PN10 IN FORMATION S,STCM,_.. J .il i.�u. ' Z,,h3 wn < 6.— -: r .,' .ik` l?<':Y leYai?Py 'Sxi 's;X p,YS�r f .4t it A ,T@: 0 .);s1;,.. h� y � ' � �i� f y. : � ,U:; y,. .2}V ! f � 1 ri ' < _ `y 1 ux r a gY r CP.:^3 . i a Yi ' :Q ., 5' 'q a +�``�r r 4'.ufi , Y�-[^•�# �,..: � ' L�fr•'' s'5 a0i44,, P" r ? Q.v . 04,., ,y° ` a 5 i . F 'y':..: .- •'Y' i t{ J ':A . r B� ,T' Fowler School Campus u s' ` +a N?r .•`� . F. ', ; p ,�,,-.rlt yn Y 'r ,..'+s �T � s t,c i r , i Is: Via 1 t*x`+.•'M .: � �. ' I-*, �# :,..,„• x7..iy � d`l*� a ^•e „ L ' .>w .y „s # 4,-i 3 ' ,,., if,., ,, ;., � YTi r1+�' ,. 1 n p tl• and M} 1 fa i . < i t• ,,r r, e L ;" 6r w..1, (-,7,..-i . }?= ' � t2 •, M; i t r� t r1 • y„� 'r ., , ^S p a� I.• ",}r♦, afr ±^t�xt r .Y:4 r.1 ..., t# ',4.'4. s,, ltL i. 7tl/J1,4:a.'�e Y.ah 1 r ZFv.'� i'K++a* M1 4. ., ',; `'� M1 is r:y v� r- J ;A, ,T�,S .v 'x(, T l. wf. , "c ;re,r; gp �., f X }�;: f a "•^, t • b�C t •'1'' ' e 1i;'; "4� �/a ':3,i b ' ?•T.<R� .dr r,4' ` }3!1 t V a. c „ w, t Y }!? � j i.»Y l Z` .-i.... .4474�� 1a.f✓;'k tigation Project ec I. t_L�' s,y ;;- e.°� .f �'a b}y� �'J #f 2 # j fi1f At�K, T'9nxx ,'y 3i.0r�fi' tns. - i 3�- +#w f ,ddd a� q . om•! ,. <,!''J u 6 arT, y' r r� 5;1�i�i 4T r�yY rcka?pt ' � '^y_F r-.N ri 1t,- . 'r . s0.f .l a L � .'' ifYr 11 F� 3 ��1Y� a s. f , y S;{ a V r sr !15 �.' fli t. Y f Y g :s7{ . w 4, 4 , _ *. < ♦L +:h.31%.r . ,C{..•• ✓ ; tF r %,• ,-;f Y y rcK F7 s y ` . t•.E ., r ' :+s 'r.� : / � lt 4 1...44; l'A'° i� ' N Apr• Y4 � .4 ilx 6∎1 1:;`e 'TN. r: V� 'k' +4n‹s • 1 �.i I5 ` .•;.:c� r :4;e:1,1,:,:-•;; r�:r le? , i a ,^~ ; ,, Y >�%'.. ,, . 4ft'P„ i[, ,i.,sx„'4r rc ,ko- •.t:7 �r r.1. 7' <4 r rl h. -t i :� c t.5 i, i •q '4'`. =A � 't<i«:= �aG, ft , t"`✓�y . �i9E' i}: a ., } .i i - e d F .. '.,. ' tsV. "4:m4.Sa .Nji X*.h ,x : ; ,L .«- is i ssrd L 3{ � } 7.,,A F 0.•. e. SJV-� "-Y�' Fr ' -I''4: .1'.; , ..Z,&-;.:...'; • PeT St y V 5#%?:c v,.O •3tilr,i ''�3 F?*;F3 !7 f r roaa� - •ATM; 'P ,a L 4,i, f4 ,i?S.S < ;{v"n5,.$ . � Y i s .tr x t ` u r ?;•. r F 1 `'fe t ,S }- "Y, t .0;=r . •f4 S.. . . ♦t/ t,✓i+`y < 7.a f:Ar aYY* t(! I+ 41 i 7^.}1iR �A7rv,.rr;•9'. ) r Vwtr{ ,r t tfi i T /`r�A. .' .:1 h v N 3'.'Ft Fx. N�{•l L (O 7C t--s 54,'-'}F 'r s 4F: ,j J v ';X f . T�S') !T `i .,4.5 C, t ,.V;-: 5s�� . � <:. .�` � � 4 l ? S -[y`Y "�� 44 1'•;• ,',! . ii-4-irg::1 t'1• f 5, a i rt_f ' �”1'j 1r � .a,4. ",i d '''el L. i♦+hL r ' y,. I• . ,r .. i' let{ 417.7.:i•:•.1.41. .• . � - 4 l;x, r i �K{~. 4, r14,�kt}. •k� ",; �� r cr fi./ "1 rr ,N `+ r � � a -St' , 1' 'T...-, .lt ,f � ' lC}-+ � .Y F ,Y } <3l r�• .,,,," . a r „ A 4,, - +� 3 . �� � . e, � Ak r ;•-.t.'. '. L.t G7 b/ k k ck is t t f n. .: t }s'' r:) r 's. 4:,';` :. ar ` , 'r .•„a .....t t / , 't .,ti r1 "e s ae s a n' 1) • r. . ,s . h r a �,Y G 0t tlit...`-.5,4,,::i. p 4 � ,' I+ '; .1 1. r, ic,' ,rt c.i - ,r?-a:.,,-4,..;•t? _. .r ,r.� r • ✓ +'� s.''F+ T: J .<+"i•3 4 . :Z3 0✓- � ,,4 r .. ,,. a 1^ , / :F ytr..c,s;'.1 Zr . . i _ iY t+ , j Y 5c1"t . .y�_s' . 1rr: .-*: .� r "f 'h #r`:✓ fir ,- ]e. ' ` -•r _� F .'jfink r.r. , .• ,rZ^ . r - M.:t ., 4o-;5 � . �, .'✓ � is Ip S t?v;•,` J � `a,r t Y i a r yc ?X3 ` iJ"-..Yt ' ),o,, • 7' Y ti? y h.X, fiir .4r -?;;;4 +ir:h e T : ,.r : .1+ ' J s> 1 >rr+ r r` '•r• a ..`r 4 . jcfi '+y ., i.,..4y s r � ♦ I �o Y��lti'Ji ^y. '` . ” ',Y > L +��4� yr 1 t 'Y i - _1 fi .^`r J a; iG ' •.''::::.-.'-!.p` r r�, /; rr .v -, • � , . F7r�. a. t c .� �� I +,•.,ia,, r . a -t,>i . „ r ._.r ;,,,.:*:'21.4'...44,:'l ` 3; ',r'r,r1 1 , � , 7 � . � i� t c.a l< cyj S . �:r�e1'.•,.;.?'*:: +5H t l` >4 v< i 4 t 1.. 4,?,,, `-.-:... ,.'r:-.;...r'.4.-:4:N.,,...:,?,!._:;,,,,,,:,..,-.. 1 7 . < !.,43.,,. , F :. �t i , T > 2t r � t ..4,1;i` 1 -s`. ,, 1 :• . 1 ; J .� 'ti 1 y F17„" f? $1 i ,.y '017:::$. : 7' ,U t ,a r .. x r 8`rt�•� '^ + � .n tw+ �F r r ♦T 1 a ]1.,.:.. at�-Cv 3 x4 iJ�.. •�.: j j F * r .• 1•[j_ t f'4 s Ti;:as-�',r," �d' a ',l:..- : o )”"r yt F` A0't r. ..,44...4:-:".3 U a,:..►:.. t ,� '-i....?', aY ', er 4 S..ti'rt� p y 4 - <r` - -• ..> ; + �l } d •<* 'r s� L-4 Y ..,♦!r „r ,"4 -y Y y (t,-,;;;,,,,.•••,:;-,•,-,.=;„.., . y' i r� s ter p n 4? , 7,-,'.",, c �$ � �'h - t r J S j`Z �k A 9 4rjz:i w ar t. a4 ,rr,. S- ....,,:''.:et,.. *l r 9Er #s 0 nt .. ' � 12; '' �r i 'Y;(,,,;4 ,41‘1,,,14.!'`.44:..!4:1)'r,y'tis ).;i4 � Y. +. 1 a, 5 + !#; S t 12`1 ".14$ ,,1, . . 4y ?- tt t 5,-t. a,a ri ri q t :�lyiii.'l 6 F F L .f2 A 4j t]` k:•,•.:,4•"" :t� S :., ' -'4N- ` At -4 �J%:`j. Ar', *,- *a 1t •',41=.4,4,-...."4,4'a"... ti tdiE ,y. ',.'. ';^itl 1 i . �Y , I' ,s ;*-'1.7. ::!.A-.....17.'74 �t;;.1?ML „y* J 4 v s ef j , 1S _ ;: > yt, r 3 ! z=3,,0) � . ir 1M1 ' ; : 1 rY /'_a� 3. '' •' .123. !� c f, { � 1 lk ' ;G , '" i . :.i1� a.� s -t°d.>.,:: �r '14. S # i. . yf ° ` r . -. , . � A' l !-3J ,� „ t ( r . 3r1 _.,t . S `1 � r 1” .6y+y. ? b r r Ys l'ri qArS � F.,/ �Qv t ? 3 1 i! 3 t.:''sJ f'. ♦ ~ y" � ' , c,x S F �v " ' � ` 5 ,•ff 3, 4{i l - ar *v l 'R . . ti+ 2. b y1= T .. {:i' .� t I • • W'v 7 - y N �1, 4�G Yk. si, ' `^s r 4 '"v.T T �`+S .• a ,. K i '•••t>.'•• Y Y� ` W.•,9 k a 1 i C. : ' . 4.-.4,11,i.4....,....-:(4t, 'q', i :< i x e 5 ' ' /a'°S %z �Y ravyfi �'1U .' i , J k T 4' T' nYJ3 y -+i y!tea 4d,: '! Yk 6 3 , I r n w. a ` 1„.. s tr't j v , I a 9.r • `q ! < t..- 7 F., -"l# ;:.R 1 j t' _ i `3 iFanno Creek Trail Permit' �t 7. ' ` .,)",:',;‘;'.,?..-.V + M .(,5 r .4 9� t . .t . „ • !,. .•'i . 'C.t i>c ,t . , > . r. s z f ?:' . 17 , ' :.it 7.41 >. ., .t 9 of 9• • • . . •?r � - 'v ? - r . , h r-`1 e% t-'hp" .1 y Z - 7•' ,,r � x j i ti t:,.... 1 +l ''� .. „.401,,,,,,.:174H3., E ! b, Sheet 3 3_+t-.5-r�', V r, <: ( ,. .ly#S:wS F t. . . „i ' •� r',- 1 . � . ,as " ”' . a.':„'♦v.,.'.. K r.,• .}T r-"-..< �v { ,: "-•I t,x, ._. # :I a .. .-.a::• a . `.t,. . 3••.••«a.„,...• Mii,-....a ; 1..-.l.�R r.._>. '. l,F .:'„ 1 Y i t .., r`r ° < ,' yy ,p " �' ri ' r4 :Jr` G } ti : < �-pi • ' C v:: ;`f ale: ,� r .'...1.;•;',.: r- n ,,,i J ► y 1 e 1 .. ci, � , r : i ar f- r, ' E„' + # t w l ,,,,,..,.;.:4.,.., : .a ��'.n r,.: Y' " 7 r .,s1 'j d l a y v.t 4 . k fit�' e+ !.t ?.4,,,,......4:- '{Fw.S.%`i � a K ► ! L � I� k- kY vv<r''r � t . J . t 1 ` , {fi 1 r ‘‘'.4.-.!..r;'-‘4,• .. �i #7 �., Z '4 4 i# '' r . -+, ak'','• 1 Sop Feet,'3i o- 1 - t 1L , : , x .F • r 1.wS f 150 200 250 ;♦ { .< h' } d . y '7..;',... ?yam �v � jedt: `p �4 . 0 5o too i S S.z _ , , ' a ,' A � '. iir 9 ?D �.:.:` •tS ti { I ‘ >,>,e:°s. '?% ' `i•cr LIUr 4 •F S.:S l- 1'•138 feet�^ `' . , ..s arc '....?.?:-14,;--'-..` • 1 ..,.,Z A *� J ; • ! � Y, w ri_ N ac`'' °v , dc"ti r y . •• ':', ..1 . ?' '�* ,:^,-',/, ier 5 r - � ; . - \c fA .: .,, l t K ' a 4^-Y4E k. F i'N ~a} ' { v . t t a+ i>r r: 'i't,' L XY i♦ #' ; yr, .yr s '.� _ r t . r - ;t f t eji.'s' S qt rk rif�`R, t ? 1 i } A,. .. ..Jpp/7 xp . . r,y ,. ` .•. ti y1: 11!1'.,:fi s7%l 1 -' c. r - .t .": .r , Y.a » tir n c '-.Z a 4 yi h r L } !4 1 1 .„T,µ� .S? ` - 'x , � .o aat . '�t tY xT.�• ,w r C . r, ,x ,' S`��) s 4 „.�V ti a 4 r" , s T Zt -Y., } - a(4' r w r : ' v i,44! •••4')'•)-3..;:• ?+ h4• ,,t 4>Lr r i t. •nkF S-i"n l - £ ; . T '4-•P. • r r '•a.E.. 1,.. r ..,: `rY: ..�'H .v 1' � `# _#]w-. ,... a •G,,t'�' i: '} F sy r' , fs .* J { w'': .\ l ,; '' `.:".Y in:, L 'e'r' J , , : i, <� a ti5 f�i,.. , Sa r Y:.0.t j T ye- )1. y�i+ ikoe 1riJ„ ' City of Tigard • 'ti- r t a 'ar` . a ' � i ; ia 0: 3 t 3 .' ". 4}' !...z P- ' 1 ! )u ^' v'r3 r 4',, , # ,•: :°t 2 a.. . .A- f- `'c':fi : r',A' ' 'e-A y J i' a � r„ ' , _,P. ,_ :' 1.. - [ .ii�. i r 3 f , y yrr r•:c-iy y U q 4 s� � . ¢ Wc. • tF" . s�J '•,'; } i .i J 1 i .,>: 1f ,;� .' . ,� a• ;. j ''• '.'7.-;?.:'.;14,...i '''. + }ytzl. •.Sti'4 tCri.ii „ F.�'`�t<''9' ` ` hIounfod mbae tivordoien d thwis i1t3h m1aln5 e iSs DW evfor Heglaopell neBmNanO l t bSwervliobn e s o nDvly aisnd io n•r .v ef y • ,-,,,143.s .-1.',. ..:-;!--.....-.r,,,,.K ii � ''p 1tt; Tigard.OR 97223"--:.-,.,%:',.:z.4.1;.',..,:„.? e ,#` ._ R ;.K - {Tti Z -. f J `•• ,l M•(1),- i 1. 'iy � �? (50.3)639.4171....,-'7'...••,';‘,.:;,,..: '". . ". `SZ T4•t: . f, •�rj: fs'a•s-yv t' ;+y� i 't-:.-4 X` � v -ti : ' a �t e * 2 � 1Ma+`Y �Y?R.e f?af 3, � : rdtplic rv.ci.tigard or.us. -i ( t Y k ,� FIVt + , ' a yy` !! 417 v .t.� fi c ,1 ° .�� ) l ;-'40,;-,-:.1%;..-.Aslla i :. s,j;y r c .q a-f'4.1 •.il�, ti x a.-A• kr, t y z IA'' , . .- ,vF., .:.x:...= .+ y_ .. .SL.• .; y,•• • '.,, Plot date:Sep 11,1998;i:Urpinduane\wetmap.apr 3rpoh of Mitigation Site - eo • TABLE OF PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS FOWLER SCHOOL MITIGATION SITE mmon Name Scientific Name Indicator Type Size Number of Plants Approximate Total #of Plants, (minimum) per 10 x 10 SF* Planting Area (SF), by Area =# per every 100 SF by Area (see Figure 7) gon ash Fraxinus latifolia FACW nursery stock 5 to 6 feet tall 1,plus clump of 3 every 44,590(C) 317+ 13=330(C) 50 feet •Hooker]willow Salix piperi[hookeriana] FACW cutting 4 to 5 feet tall 3 9,600(C) 210(C) [FACW-] osier dogwood Cornus stolonifera[sericea] FACW nursery stock 2 to 3 feet tall 2 7,800(A&B)+9,600(C) 156(A&B)+ 192(C)=348 'fie ninebark Physocarpus capitatus FACW- nursery stock 2 to 3 feet tall 1 7,800(A&B)+9,600(C) 78(A&B)+96(C)= 174 tered wild rose Rosa pisocarpa FAC nursery stock 2 to 3 feet tall 2 7,800(A&B)+9,600(C) 156(A&B)+ 192(C)=348 tern crabapple Pyrus[Malus]fusca FACW nursery stock 2 to 3 feet tall 1 7,800(A&B)'+9,600(C) 78(A&B)+96(C)= 174 TANCEMENT elderberry Sambucus cerulea FACU nursery stock 1 to 2 feet tall 1 800(D) 80(D) flowering currant Ribes sanguineum UPL/NOL nursery stock 1 to 2 feet tall 2 800(D) 160(D) :atoon serviceberry Amelanchier alnifolia FACU nursery stock 2 to 3 feet tall 1 800(D) . 80(D) e2 aca.a.. rli,ij a /0/s . - , , . , K6)(0i _2_o (o) _ • • LEGEND Consultants in ecology and natural resource management Fanno Creek Trail - Fowler School Site DRAWN: S.Benjamin Mitigation Plan APPROVED: M.Walker _ o" �� Fishman Environmental Services PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS o MAN 434 NW Sixth Avenue • Suite 304 DATE: 11/16/98 y Portland,Oregon 97209-3600 REVISED: 03/08/99 - (503)224-0333 lam# 8 of 9 Project#98073 • c:\98073\pintspa.cdr Stia[�— a DIVISION OF STATE LAND `', Waterway Project Permit Review Division of State Lands RECEIVED MIME: May 14, 1999 775 Summer Street NE Salem, OR 97310 .PAY 1 7 1999 `' 503-378-3805 or FAX 503-378-4844 r ur TIGARD Corps Public Notice No.: 99-39 State Project No.: RF-16660 Corps Coordinator: Jan Stuart/Bill Davis DSL Coordinator: Bill Parks, ext.234 Applicant: ODOT County: Washington/Clackamas Please return comments to the Division of State Lands by: June 7, 1999 IF YOU HAVE COMMENTS,PLEASE SEND A COPY TO BOTH THE CORPS AND DSL, SEPARATELY. Application involves: • Structure • Fill • Removal O Riprap O Coastal Zone O Willamette Greenway O LWRMP 0 Scenic Waterway • Wetlands O Essential Salmonid Habitat 0 Water Quality Limited Stream for Notice of Permit Application The attached proposal has been received for work within the waters of the State of Oregon. If you wish to make written comment on the proposed project,please use this form or attach comments and return it to us. This form is a self- addressed mailer for your convenience. Please affix proper postage. A public hearing may be requested within 25 days from the date of this notice. If a public hearing is requested,the director of the Division of State Lands will decide whether a public hearing will be held based on the merits of the request and the level of public interest. THIS NOTICE IS NOT A PERMIT I have reviewed the attached information and offer the following comments: O A permit is required by this agency. O We do not believe the project would have an adverse effect. O We believe the effects of the project, although measurable, would be acceptable. O We believe the project would be acceptable if methods of construction or design were altered as listed below O We would attend a conference with the applicant to seek project alternatives. O This project will adversely affect Threatened and Endangered Species. (please explain below.) O The project is unacceptable as proposed. (Please explain below.) O We have no comment. COMMENTS: Agency: ' ,� ce By: Date \\saleml\fo\forms\I \s c C� • • � � S STAMP DIVISION OF STATE LANDS Field Operations Western Region 775 Summer Street NE Salem, OR 97310 dr 1 FJBLIC NOTICE US Army Corps for PERMIT APPLICATION of Engineers Portland District Issue Date: May 6, 1999 Expiration Date: June 7, 1999 Corps of Engineers Action ID: 99-39 30 Day Notice Ore:on Division of State Lands Number: RF-16660 Interested parties are hereby notified that an application has been received for a Department of the Army permit for certain work in waters of the United States, as described below and shown on the attached plan. Comments: Comments on the described work should reference the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers number shown above and should reach this office no later than the above expiration date of this Public Notice to become part of the record and be considered in the decision. Comments should be mailed to the following address: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ATTN: CENWP-OP-GP (Jan Stuart) P.O. Box 2946 Portland, Oregon 97208-2946 Applicant: Oregon Department of Transportation Location: Interstate 5, mile point 291.08 to 293.05, at the Hwy 217-Kruse Way Interchange; near Carter and Ball Creek,Washington County, Tigard, Oregon (Sections 1 & 12; 6&7; T2S/R1W&R1E) Project Description: The project will permanently impact 0.24 acres and temporarily impact 0.21 acres of wetlands in the project area,Ball Creek and Carter Creek. Impacts to Ball Creek will include a 20 extension of an existing culvert where the creek enters the interchange site (see impact site 1); channel realignment where is exits the project(impact site 4). The channel realignment will include extending an existing 6' by 6' box culvert by the construction of a 64 foot rock lined concrete channel (sides and bottom concrete) and riprap lining of a 130 linear foot section of Ball Creek channel. This will allow construction of a new Hwy 217 southbound ramp to I-5. Impacts to Carter Creek will be the extension of an existing 48-inch CMP culvert by 40 linear feet (impact site 3). This will allow for the construction of a new I-5 ramp to Hwy 217 westbound. There will be substantial impacts to existing trees and shrubs in the Kruse Way swamp area during construction of the two overhead ramp structures. Part of the temporary construction impacts will include impacts to the upland berm between the Ball Creek channel and Kruse Way Swamp. The vegetation to be removed may include mature trees (Douglas fir, Oregon oak, and ash), and several smaller red alder, in addition to shrubs, including spiraea and ninebark. In addition, the Ball Creek channel will be crossed by construction equipment in this area. • • r Purpose: To improve safety and operation of the Interstate 5 interchange with Hwy 217 and Kruse Way. Drawings: Twelve (-12-) drawings labeled ODOT I-5/Hwy 217 interchange COE#99-0039 Additional Information: Additional information may be obtained from Alan Lively, Oregon Department of Transportation, Transportation Building, Room 307, Salem, Oregon 97310-1354, s telephone (503) 986-3782, or by telephoning, Jan Stuart, Project Manager,U.S. Army Corps of Engineers at (503) 808-4381. Authority: This permit will be issued or denied under the following: Section 404, Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), for discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States. Water Quality Certification: A permit for the described work will not be issued until certification, as required under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (P.L. 95-217), has been received or is waived from the certifying state. Attached is the state's notice advertising the request for certification. Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation: The impact of the activity on the public interest will be evaluated in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency guidelines pursuant to Section 404(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act. Public Hearing: Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Endangered Species: Preliminary determinations indicate that the proposed activity may affect an endangered or threatened species or its critical habitat. Consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat.,844) will be initiated. A permit for the proposed activity will not be issued until the consultation process is completed. Cultural Resources: The described activity is not located on property registered or eligible for registration in the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places. This notice has been provided to the State Historic Preservation Office. Evaluation: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the described activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the described activity, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors, which may be relevant to the described activity will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water • • /+ quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, consideration of property ownership and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, state, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. Additional Requirements: State law requires that leases, easements, or permits are obtained for certain works or activity in the described waters. These State requirements must be met, where applicable, and a Department of the Army permit must be obtained before any work within the applicable Statutory Authority, previously indicated, may be accomplished. Other local governmental agencies may also have ordinances or requirements, which must be satisfied before the work is accomplished. • • I _- • iS1Y ° b.•.• OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . v �,^....". (ww Y" :: MM�.• ° 0 • ^"^ `� ' ° �f I-5 AT HWY 217/KRUSE WAY UNIT 1) PROJECT ""� r`' © m °° 9 "°�' CLACKAMAS AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES ��/����'•' Q a,,., °""" 0 C. um 0., j VICINITY MAP "On © yr 10) Cpl y° Tr . .":—A• 7 "'" a�.a F"' Sllt. 1 _ Q1©tina� Q ao � ..( a.. Nr -d^ ODOT I-5/Hwy 217 Interchange illUK . m •_« COE 99-0039 .w.CI. m v`• ical ° " '"'°'""' r SHEET 1 OF 11141, 4-30-99 "" ✓L+tea r(„4. LAKE OSWEGO P. (I t.k ,I ;. \ ; ''' \\_. -\.....t1,..-2,• r, W w {j- „. o0. <? J^ O , f.\ ` 0 r ` ... .,. .JCS „7/f•-\ ,., ,.,. �'� I— I,., �; END OF PROJECT—V �.J L�;. afar..,a •� c v i '� I / (,x—c. 1 I " I,/ II fn. I-4° %j n li �� `1 _ I �"y L-- _ I --.;_cir9 .„-E—vir_: , . I': I = I fl ,.: I lil!j—J^��\, S.. SII . .,� ^I II II" ` ! :' C. NNY.- WASMINCiTON �� .a. '`�.... .._ ....h____;) $Y tl <I �. I ...\•V ?, ==1 .1 ao�aa :I TIGARD . '�\' II t,: rl� i1_ ,.�I -I aI I I. I Sht.#1 -Vicinity Map w� i�� .� ;I�JLJL ' �� ( �;i l,� '� �, � rr i L I• 3 —Ball Cr. Culvert Ext. �I ti,11)," -' °�L v --- --- 4 —Ball Cr. Channel Change rl! ; �y III s i 5 —Riparian Planting Plan.:.,,; ��{• I >r`I K.•.l� .p Q,e , _ 6 —Riparian Planting Plan 11---- j c l 1 Pty` F 7 —Wetland Mitigation Vicinity Ma VP? // �.....,ll-11-' ,.\, :.,. g n Map �� 8 —Wetland Mitigation Planting Plan • ��" 4\,,. � P� < <_ $ .teI �; 9 —Wetland Mitigation Grading Plan °s ''i Y ��p'�� r ,,q� �o`' r_ ,:. " . 10 —Wetland Mitigation Details ]I= •� ,. P� i [ o "—� 11 —Wetland Mitigation Details J u� Ii 0�e 0 ''"°c^ y`,, r T. 2 5.. .12 —Wetland Mitigation Details R. I w.. I E., W.M. 13 —Wetland Mitigation Details • 14 —Wetland Mitigation Plant List . BEGINNING OF PROJECT . ODOT I-5/Hwy 217 Interchange OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COE 99-0039 I-5 AT HWY 217/KRUSE WAY(UNIT 1) PROJECT SHEET 2 OF`t84 a.. 4.30-99 CLACKAMAS AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES PROJECT IMPACT SITES Sht.2 r Impact site#1 Extend existing 84 inch CMP 20 feet and construct wingwalls (see sht.3 for details) Impact site#2 Wetland area#6 impacts–0.015 ac. Wetland area#2 impacts–0.056 ac. Wetland area#6a impacts–0.015 ac. ,� Removal= 40 C.Y. Impact site#3 0 Removal= 30 C.Y. ,lb Fill =245 C.Y. Remove headwall and extend Fill =100 C.Y. �a existing 48 in CMP 40 feet , c. Wetland#1 impacts–0.073 ac. kg , ) n Removal= 60 C.Y. 'I/, Fill =475 C.Y. ; ) —.......c.z....—......„ ____IL7 __•_.471.11._....isumeminv ,Arh, iffta 1-5 1711/77 1 I-S .. r T.- VO Ball Creek 1 i%. 1 ..-} 1 //. Impact site#4 , Extend existing 6 ft.by 6 ft.box culvert 64 feet Construct concrete rock lined channel 225 feet 001 Construct riprap lined channel feet TOTAL IMPACTS, . v7;443 (see sht.4 for details) g Wetland#7 impacts–0.080 ac. Removal = 300 C.Y. Removal=170 C.Y. Fill = 1610 C.Y. Fill =790 C.Y. Wetlands=0.24 Acre t, .. 1 L OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • I-5 AT HWY 217/KRUSE WAY(UNIT 1)PROJECT CLACKAMAS AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES • xtend the existing 84 inch CMP IMPACT SITE 1 by 20 feet and construct wingwalls Sht.3 •• I' Type 2A &r rodtypteall • ODOT I-S/Hwy 217 Interchange Eststin0'0uardrail COE 99-0039 dl� SHEET 3 OF!i-/-- 4-30-99 , \ \ y ' 1r1r a»�Ton t� ", " t�rf' 1 �w'�� .— 11p o • / / • • • . 0 KA"Line i %= ::..•44 e. a eei••*e Werae:WM ��vi e .v.el PLAN ••••�*** ••••••• ♦•*••♦ ••••0•!et•.444...•• . •/••••••4 • !•••••i •. f "KA"Line Finish ground line •%:','• 84 inch CHIP �0••�s trm /••••j•• •••••••• I —60 -�ExiaHrq 0►an0 line tet•�•�►' •.1-•.•■• 1_' ---- -�------------ ----- ' -55 'I�� Oats d structure aaoartion • Pass'C"Leading —50 �— Slope 0.652% • M. Elevations ore Dosed on teeHotioatleodelic • ELEVATION TYPICAL PIPE SECTION Vorttaa,datum O Reno►'Headwall O Install 2100 CM?.advert 6m conned . to existing 2100 advert pipe.Connection • t0 be Meter tiye►. OS Construct headwall. • Q Cross 50 riprap.See 6.0.'00000 for details. • ODOT I-5/Hwy 217 Interchange OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COE 99-0039 I-5 AT HWY 217/KRUSE WAY (UNIT 1) PROJECT SHEET 4 OF 10.I aL 4-30-99 CLACKAMAS AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES IMPACT SITE 4 Ii Sht.4 • ::::::9_4592,0 ssu6 :0° ill- °'°°° `„,� a • 0000 �°c O • • A • — B � 000� Construct concrete rock lined channel-225 ft. Constrict riprap lined chap net-130 ft, • • e.•aoJ. es.` -e... _ ... . _ V • ll` rl' �1 3 14 14 4•.U' .4. 41'a - • .. . • Slope 0:05% ---j • • "SBT" "RAY"Line SBT` 55' - £ 56' "RAY"Line .l 16' , r 25' ? I . I_ • • 0.5 Loan RIDroO Cass 501 Typical A-A . Typical B-B -- .--• OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I-5 AT HWY 217/KRUSE WAY (UNIT 1) PROJECT Construct rock lined channel bottom with CLACKAMAS AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES meandering low flow channel: BALL CREEK LOW FLOW CHANNEL IMPACT SITE 4 Place bar run rock 1 foot deep and 700 lb. Sht.4A boulders on the channel sides. Place bar run rock 0.5 foot deep in channel center. ODOT IS/Hwy 217 Interchange COE 99-0039 SHEET 4a OF 12 4-30-99 • ----1-1-1---------- --1-------------------- ______ _____ __________________L____ ----___, I tl -}±� �-!� A O 0 0 O-. • • • q. `' r 0 c-, 0 0 ' � i�► � �• 4411. 11111imilimmpersis,, .. ......,„....„.4 ''B` TA~ to — [ to m Between I PLAN Sections ION Some• 11150 • 25 m 2.5 m 25 m 25 m U m U m 25 m 25 m 15 m { 15 m 1 15 m 15 m 500 etch Link 00 I pain Link 5001 CAOIn Lint Chin Lint 1D_ �-- fence fence iAy fence Pence Woo 2 24., Woa 2 500 t Won 50� No 12 1 - j mismi . Boulders Class 50 SECTION "A-A" SECTION 'B-B" SECTION "C-C" SECTION 'D-D" Riprgo No Scott No Scale No Scots No Soule All Dimensions Shown Are In Deters Unless Otherwise Noted i OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ., o I-S AT 217/KRUSE WAY(UNIT 1)PROJECT cn CLACKAMAS AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES w CARTER CREEK CULVERT m i d* 2 10 IMPACT SITE 3 • Sht.4H 0 r A m FboAvay Cbno ,r- .,� �,� •� • ODOT IS/Hwy 217 Interchange ca .a ..y •' I:. -.. , :^ • r. .� • . . Vm COE 99-0039 Z0 b 0, , *Z0 .ZZrr * rrrrrr 4-30-99 „ Loss Rlprgp try`1r��ltr©;;trcjIlleialif :Ifidlllrdiettrc•Vr4sptie '-`r 3i al w (class 100 1�q�tt�.. VV..'10Avo.It e.wQ.•pr d•or, 1..t'iprIP a�1� m 1„ `oftr `�.tr r•i1r 'mask Neflr `rant �.(tr �ltr �tQr �(1.!#,•- aD co .•1•1tr©sitr©oao 4 6,••11r�wltr�4llr o Ca ... o it, +,►..•. .. �p ~• •r�,I4r ., Lre • Remove headwall &extend existing 4 ft CMP 40 feet . Jack new S ft pipe ander hwy next to exiting pipe A counter sunk 1 ft. Protect inlet with riprap. Work ELEVATION area to be isolated from the active flowing stream. ti ti 01 impacts—0.073 ac. 0 STA. "L5" 25+47 i . Lt. Removals 60 C.Y. Fill 8.473 C.Y. H W N.R.Romp et* �. • Loose Rlprop i ,_r, (Class 10D) -� •. •. ■• •t , • "ii) .4;.4�Tfi ���4�4A.4 4fi svt4`.be+ti 3.L__- p. .. ;pFe'find`�fi ` r5�41,�`.*m`V1.`0t0t0 01 Oroar►e LIne Loose Rtprlop •` Coss 100) Pips IN r i1 g1;Tr,- (�ril�C 1%44* " A%!`4i��li4iri li'�i�i��i4ili.�i�i. 40,E 0,4iari�t ,r o__j L 0% 4A ca 0 0 6— SECTION A-A 0. • ODOT I-5/Hwy 217 Interchange • • COE 99.0039 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF T 0 BIG LEAF MAPLE SHEET 5 OF 1 /�,L TRANSPORTA 4-30-99 1-5 AT HWY 217/KRUSE WAY (UNIT 1) PROJECT ION 0 RED ALDER CLACKAMAS AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES • RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN - UPPER BALL CREEK O PACIFIC MAL3R NE Sht. 5 • 0 INCENSE CEDAR • O OREGON ASH 0 SCARLET OAK OOREGON WHITE OAK Existing Evergreen Tree O NORTHERN RED OAK Existing Deciduous Tree Edge or Shoulder III ODOUGLAS AS F/R Existing BrusAline • e\� • � _1 < .:A • y o '` r .�O WESTRN RED CEDAR ' ' i, l: pT / :.i- - .:" ' :. GV::o vQ vile MAPLE / + % I U �1 J ^ iC �) % k !• OCEAN SPRAY 0Of /:: l I•.o viii, v RRr � �% '' '~ '' . fc s I :`f O R ED ELDERBERRY O a 0o'.� /:. r r � l O• � JT oO. ou 7 a v•J O" ' • � �d •..Y O 0 I lt•• O r G O' i r ✓V 111,w 'a giber L. r ;ire ♦ ,oil 1" Ro- J y > o U ♦ r f � t ro ♦ M/ �: :� • � vu e 1 ® 0 0 o M.1 �•o o. f' � r 'r 0 •pp, ♦ ,.: r••r QpQUI\^. Gp - .per i/ 0 OD et J _ r Op 4,8%::::;;;;::••• ..K; �'� Y�,;�(L�..�`^ O �3 C;•J U`0\r' r Urr, � / .0+� r. �v.�''�:°'obi 1 Creek_E 84• +-.—�li�r,\I�•� �e`: �•.I,00ci,. SaO�P��� �'�• � Canmao snaw[rr .:t t�1 O JUp.. xist1 ;• -.. \ \ •.11!'' nv .!:;:: ;•:•::•i:❖:•i•'J .•�••• 1. O y• i uo 8:... t„e `� Qg IQCb C wl} ?Jr •O•iS• Q� r�'� / \\\\ Shiny-Leaved'Spare :wI O' qUP V •(.1� �•��.�.�. • gQ� \ �:., • . �, •i!�":p7 Red-Flowering QA7en/• a\ 1/p'(+000`� •,.4�i•C '••••1 \ \ •�.���.�.�.��i0i0iiOPr..�w•r�:� .�.� Te//a' •*.- :..3:.• : \ \•.:•......--,-,..,.. pad' II buy,/Dogwood ,. _?: wad s S/iawArrry Edge or Shoulder —� 5'Y::c:s3 c ZotelLowe/ Le"Oswego C ly Limits Di —Edge or Povmenl �: r4;: �.. ,•�Oswe .• , . Pacific Highway (1-5) •j W:/ditowerM:.. Tigard City Limits r I I . I • r r J— \\\\\ seedyLown \\\\\ • • • ODOT I-S/Hwy 217 Interchange OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COE 99-0039 1-5 AT HWY 217/KRUSE WAY(UNIT 1) PROJECT SHEET 6 OF (.;2 4-30-99 CLACKAMAS AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES RIPARIAN PLANTING PLAN- LOWER BALL CREEK O 8/C LEAF MAPLE Sht. 6 O RED ALXR cr OPAC/F/C'MORONE ' � O /NCENSE CEDAR t fr- /)173, O OREGON ASH J ......"''..6"."."..41%1� * Existing Evergreen Tree O° SCARLET OAK g \ © Existing Deciduous Tree O CEGaV WHITE OA t\0 "p i w 16,4 J \ r� Existing Brus/line/ o°I'l '` Edge of Povmenl \ Ma4THERN RED OAA •� � q O Ci g(Pp O La.CLAS FIR - /qo// Q %R ,Re°MOM aly Limits • O —Z—� ... O WESTRN RED CEDAR 0 VINE MAPLE • _ .;:•'..!.., • ; '�`7°,• � 0 OCEAN SPRAY AY Jo 9()0 O OSOBERRY/ . o • t 0 RED ELDERBER• RY�l�) •.•.‘•••••.'.•.•.•.•.•.!%:!•:•:.•:,•:•:•.•.//eU/��;�: : :::.;:�• UpU ip J J'O.JJJ J ®iOOT ; ;:;•••••;... o...,.... :...•....... .. . .. __.• ,0.0 T�'<)=i, ..;.�..,t� •.•...••.: ••••., ...... � ____.0.,_„_,___O VO p0 (-� Ilti:li •..r g`'�ter:i :•:'d.:!•%. :•i 4- --." • f ODOT I-5/Hwy 217 Interchange OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION '• COE 99-0039 4-30-99 SHEET 7 OF AA 4-30-99 AT HWY 217/KRUSE WAY(UNIT 1)PROJECT CLACKAMAS AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES WETLAND MITIGATION VICINITY MAP Sht.7 S, 94/I/gyros ) �a`rer • 1 8�y - H I ETA L.) sr. Nom OM07111 I !T. , . ( -11-- 447:, pLa e sr, ..,Li 1 „ et sf `. �•• s r. 4.. \\�. \/ O r` ME �'� etP • 3 r D . /,,,„6 /1. 4,4,, ,\A\ 401, t,,, ,,, _.,_ \., s i ) /N>/■,.. • /\.' 1\ WETLAND MITIGATION SITE ' , ODOT I-5/Hwy 217 Interchange . • COE 99-0039 SHEET 8 OF 11,A.. 4-30-99 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . . 1-5 AT HWY 217/KRUSE WAY(UNIT 1) PROJECT BearpMeing 7ree st ...z.., ,,, .......) , —s Daednduous Hawthorne CLACKAMAS AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES . i \ r k _ .--- \ WETLAND MITIGATION PLANTING PLAN ( • ( .01), ) ( . ) Sht 8 Hawthorne \ ... ....... \ Groding Limits Approz in Centerle Of TOTAL WETLAND CREDITS Abandoned ttcgdway / i# I to ee.4 1 1 I C 1 1111111It \\ 0 • Vk l'a i Creation Enhancement 0 '.ntA d " I '1 0.282 ac.4 1.5 + 0.420 ac 4.3 =0.328 acres II t I I 110\I\ 4.#:211 / . 1 1 ...","...-v.--4.:; „5111 \;:::::........ \ . • 'k. 1/4. • 1 II i ...............,14 ........c...........I IMMO 11■11■11111111•1•\ •.. Proposed Wetland&mimicry \ \ \ thtle4 0 ,41 11/4.., =.1.1r......m.v., I ,,,: ..,.......\ ..„-- k Kssi,st,, 1 , A\ 711.avea ;-.'"Al Ilh .A \\ 0 00 ,--, Als, "1)k ... ,=,, ). „p, ....=.,.........j. r Proposed Welland .• •• .1.4' 2A r I.M r I MMI M..4 1 i="a Mk".. 41,-.-„,,,, . *., A 1 ..;9‘ Grad, LimIti rAvfri;:_ =.1.illitt.".11:41.1V.■1/1 talh \ "MI:allF="1;f 1"1"Ifli I 11 I ,....!.tv.°4\, \ -. i? .,.. ,. ., ■ OrV ' ......... . 5 -- -5 MIL-3111MAJIMII■ \ ts ..01004\14\ I M I IM a I MIEMIIMION•■■■■••■ IL \ Plant Pahastrfne Emergent(Zone 1)500 mm o.o. MENN/Shasaf1M111■11•11 Mi=f MAIMINT11■11111MMINNIII■ ■ M (Approx.1083 mg) vs.s.m 11)-(- • '.:" Seed As Otrected With Seed Mix"'A''' \ \"11.$1-11 r:„.... .m....1 m"..•1 1.k irmr. 'Vs., \ • (Wetland Mix) 0 (APProm.325 mg) NI :"..... t." • - =MEI lk \ .\,‘ N I I I MI 11••■•••■Mill ININ1 \ . Plod Palustrine Shrvb/Foratted(Zone 2). \\...4 10411 , Zu■Nowirr■---•■•*a_ wAswir 1101111C \ 11111111 0 Space At Hated On Sht.4 E. ,....... .wr....■.4 (Approx.1422 mg) 4•\t *7 -1-11-• . ■V A•1`1")"\- -) *1/4-A-'Ll \\ IrS % .--' -- \ 0 .04, ts4 etc,\ r:. ..f-.... ..irwitk;,,tt7 Plant Ripalan Fame(Zoos 3). -- ■ \ 0 sSird it"4-1EL:Vintra mu) \ t 00A .,:r--== , '1, ,4„. \ (Approx.1133 mg) \T .fifylA 4tkl.,ilttNee,*or4,6'•, -L Plant Riparian Restorotion acme 4) W- Aff r 4 C) Space As Mated On SM.4 0 0 \\\ (Approx 987 mg) 0 rA/t\ 1 \ \ •IN‘Ills,41",i s vv. op ,creek MA Penne civet -\-L..t. ROMO&Fi1fnç 0 % 0'6; dt.%I) • 0 Rubuso:slcolor(Himalayn a Blackberry). 000 wsi4e#A& N 1 \ ■:, ' 000 And Cratoegim monogyna(English HmvMorn) (Approx.907 ml) Approx.LIM Of Work Planting ...., Seed Mix-e•(Erosion Control&Crtowtosnr) N........ 1.:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•i .(9 And cA CmtrIll Fabric: (Approx.765 in') /:• donna&VW Area (For Detall.See SM.3) 0 * 20 io • :1 m Seed Mix'V'(Etoston Ocntnd&Orcemdconcr) METERS I \I1 Approx.750 mg) • r- . --., +7 • OREGON DEPARTMENT OP TRANSPORTATION •. I-5 AT HWY 217IKRUSE WAY(UNIT 1) PROJECT _ CLACKAMAS AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES 46 t o 0 0 § WETLAND MITIGATION DETAILS 7 Sht. 11 '.•.: :.._- no • _''_';� ;R +_ i_•r_:�;�_I ODOT 1-5/Hwy 217 Interchange 7....7,-.- COE 99-0039 aim vel SHEET 9 OF Viol, 4-30-99 SI 0 • 600 inn 42 SCALE: Horlz.= 1:2 Vert. • 1:1 SECTION A-A 0 O © O . 46 Elio. +5 AMIE• t+� V O Bottomon 4f ed S1►ale ++ M-' r l Elevation Boundary(Approx.) SCALE 0 Hortz.• t:10 © © ®Grading Limits Vert. • 1:1 0 SCALE:Horiz.•1:10 M Evicting Grouts Vert. • hi QQ Edge 0r SWo/e • SECTION D-0 C) SECTION C-C p Proposed flnlshed crude pO Rlpr -dose 100 +6S . 0 0 0 0 O m 0 0 QQ finer Blanket- 150 mm (100 mm —0 em SYaoe) \ o o 25 o +ssv - _ k C Ormeet Approved t. Filmillim ENE ® Channel Bottom (Fenno Creek)" ++S � • 1111 n Ordinary Cow Water IIRE t Ele affon 41.1 43.5 ©A ITr�-1 46© SCALE 0 SCALE _ Hertz.• 010 Horlz.= 1e2 0 0 Vert. • i:i § Vert. • hl SECTION B-B SECTION E-E • a • OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION • I-5 AT HWY 217/KRUSE WAY(UNIT 1)PROJECT CLACKAMAS AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES ODOT I-S/Hwy 217 Interchange WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN LIST COE 99.0039 Sht. 14 SHEET 10 OF IQ/X 4-30-99 • BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME GRADE CLASS SPACING PLACEMENT IN ZONE TOTAL • ' . op... ZONE I-PALUSTRINE EMERGENT . (See Nate 11 . Ste►sedge T1 Bottom Of Slrpls 300 Sdroue Eall Hard-stem byt RI Bottam Of Swale 300 ShalKru'ted bulrush T1 500 mm ao. Bottom Of Swale 300 SIBIBBIOINLIMENE Common t treed T1 Iregulorty Group Bottom Of Strode 300 - Dense sedge TI For Natural 370 • ix-8N a Booked sedge T1 . • Ap.n+Ce 370 Sorbs*sedge T1 Remainder Or Zone 370 etctufkle.Ana?eeca nofus Taper-tip rush TI 370 ,Amax arrows San rush T1 370 ZONE 2 - PALUSTRINE SHRUB/FORESTED (See Note 21 • • • Tromp f pz'nus ktW a (rem ash No.5 Cotalner 5 m as Throughout Zone 2 35 MOPES, SFstbeS Red-osier dogwood See'Mariam SAsda►N For Nursery Stoat'(ANSI 200J-19961 T2 • TMaghOut Zane 2 175 For Minimum Pont Quantity Standards. eliZIENCZIESNENAN PaaMlo nlabork T2 • Upper ThIrd a Zone 2 42 Marx/flow T2 My 4 Mods 500 sea e4 TMagPad Zone 2 175 1J Leas 30%0f Zone I Oppen.As Directed By oOOT Environmental. Scaler willow T2 Spas Moos J w ea Upper TNrd Qr Zone 2 42 PJ Leave 30%0'Zone 2 Shrub Planting Area Open SEILECEthElErl Vita willow T2 Throughout Zone 2 175 As Directed 13y o00T Environmental. 4 • Herbaoeoum • E Dana sedge T1 Low Lo Half Of Zone 2 1680 41211.1118A352011 Henderean's sedge TI 500 mm oa Upper Half 0f Zone 2 1680 k83211 etfuws Soft rush T1 Throughout Zone 2 3360 PLANT 7YPE Ksr - RZ•Rhizome ZONE 3 -RIPARIAN FORESTS ZONE 4 - RIPARIAN RESTORATION TI•Tueelnp P nttnern 163 army T2 •Tueeling(LbviMner)525 a,,3 Trees, Oregon ash No.5 Container Throughout Zones 3 &4 82 f easnainstearea Block oditnwsod Na 5 Container 4 m as Throughout Zones 3 &4 82 Q,egOn while oak No.5 Container Throughout Zone 4 82 Shrubs, anelee NE dbuolasl! Blink hawthorn 72 • 600 X 21 Pentlo nlnetark 7E aril 4 Mods 500 sn ail. Throughout Zones 3 &4 600 Clustered rose T2 Space pups 2 is as 600 SYnn/arlasroat albs Snaoteny T2 600 Herbaceous; Dewey*sedge • Zone 3 csaLtrzostria Henderosi✓s sedge T1 1 aA Throughout Zones 3 &4 p5� Telllma aradlfbra frfngewp T1 Throughout Zone 4 2400 SEEDING Nix'A•IWetond Seed) Openings(30X Zan 11 325 mt Mlx-r(Erasion Control Cutalope Ony.Zone 3 765 mt Mx'B'(Crane/owl 4.!n Areas Of 750 mt Merits Plant Remora) r —x • • • PUBLIC NOTICE Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality 401 Certification Corps of Engineers Action ID Number: 99-39 Notice Issued: May 6, 1999 Oregon Division of State Lands Number: RF-16660 Written Comments Due: June 7, 1999 WHO IS THE APPLICANT: Oregon Department of Transportation LOCATION OF CERTIFICATION ACTIVITY: See attached U.S.Army Corps of Engineers public notice WHAT IS PROPOSED: See attached U.S.Army Corps of Engineers public notice on the proposed project NEED FOR CERTIFICATION: Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act requires applicants for Federal permits or licenses to provide the Federal agency a water quality certification from the State of Oregon if the proposed activity may result in a discharge to surface waters. DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGES: See attached U.S.Army Corps of Engineers public notice on the proposed project WHERE TO FIND DOCUMENTS: Documents and related material are available for examination and copying at Oregon Department of Environmental Quality,Water Quality Division,811 S.W.6th Avenue,Portland,Oregon 97204 While not required,scheduling an appointment will ensure documents are readily accessible during your visit. To schedule an appointment please call Donna Kelly at(503)229-6962. Any questions on the proposed certification may be addressed to the 401 Program Coordinator,(503)229-5845 or toll free within Oregon at 1-800-452-4011. People with hearing impairments may call DEQ's TTY at(503)229-6993. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Public hearing: DEQ will provide opportunity for a public hearing for interested people to appear and submit written or oral comments on the proposed permit if: • the submitted comments indicate significant public interest,or • written requests from 10 or more persons are received,or • an organization representing at least 10 persons requests a public hearing. Written comments: - - Written comments on the proposed certification must be received at the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality by 5 p.m.on(full date). Written comments should be mailed to Oregon Department of Environmental Quality,Attn: 401 Program Coordinator, 811 S.W.6th Avenue,Portland,Oregon 97204. People wishing to send written comments via e- mail should be aware that if there is a delay between servers or if a server is not functioning properly,e-mails may not be received prior to the close of the public comment period. People wishing to send comments via e-mail should send them in Microsoft Word(through version 7.0),WordPerfect(through version 6.x)or plain text format. Otherwise,due to conversion difficulties,DEQ recommends that comments be sent in hard copy. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT: DEQ will review and consider all comments received during the public comment period. Following this review,the permit may be issued as proposed,modified,or denied. You will be notified of DEQ's final decision if you present either oral or written comments during the comment period. Otherwise,if you wish to receive notification,please call or write DEQ at the above address. ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION: This publication is available in alternate format(e.g.large print,Braille)upon request. Please contact DEQ Public Affairs at(503)229-5766 or toll free within Oregon at 1-800-452-4011 to request an alternate format. People with a hearing impairment can receive help by calling DEQ's TTY at(503)229-6993. • DIVISION OF STATE LAN CPA qq_ 1 Waterway Project ec t Permit Review Division of State Lands DATE: January 15, 1999 7;5 Summer Street NE RECEIVED PLANNING Sklem, OR 97310 503-378-3805 JAN 2 0 1999 503 378-4844 FAX CITY OF TIGARD Corps Public Notice No.: 98-1090 State Project No.: RF-16167 Corps Coordinator: Jan Stuart DSL Coordinator: Bill Parks, ext. 234 Applicant: City of Tigard — J2LnhO eree..4- J Yi,' / Y77�` h/YU� prij� Please return comments to the Division of State Lands by: February 8, 1999 Application involves: • Structure • Fill • Removal O Riprap O Coastal Zone O Willamette Greenway O LWRMP 0 Scenic Waterway • Wetlands O Essential Salmonid Habitat 0 Water Quality Limited Stream for Notice of Permit Application The attached proposal has been received for work within the waters of the State of Oregon. If you wish to make written comment on the proposed project,please use this form or attach comments and return it to us. This form is a self- addressed mailer for your convenience. Please affix proper postage. A public hearing may be requested within 25 days from the date of this notice. If a public hearing is requested, the director of the Division of State Lands will decide whether a public hearing will be held based on the merits of the request and the level of public interest. THIS NOTICE IS NOT A PERMIT I have reviewed the attached information and offer the following comments: A /4'4) v5e- pp •-r.permit is required by this agency. O We do not believe the project would have an adverse effect. . O We believe the effects of the project, although measurable, would be acceptable. O . We believe the project would be acceptable if methods of construction or design were altered as listed below O We would attend a conference with the applicant to seek project alternatives. O This project will adversely affect Threatened and Endangered Species. (please explain below.) O The project is unacceptable as proposed. (Please explain below.) O We have no comment. COMMENTS: e a ovi'rc.h c-.,J.z,sL P/'i•--. •er4-. f/7;W4 3 i ie,,T,,#( 6420 CCM /V–e-00/ JMO2/RF16167 CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL TIGARD OR 97223 Agency: B 4.t " :ate / \\salem l\fo\forms\letters\sac.doc 41) • " D • STAMP DIVISION OF STATE LANDS Field Operations Western Region 775 Summer Street NE Salem, OR 97310 ,.; � UBLI , ,., , C NOTICE • US Army Corps for PERMIT APPLICATIOr Portland District Issue Date: December 21, 1998 Expiration Date: January 20, 1999 Corps of Engineers Action ID: 98-334 30 Day Notice Oregon Division of State Lands Number: RF-16167 Interested parties are hereby notified that an application has been received for a Department of the Army permit for certain work in waters of the.United States, as described below and shown on the attached plan. Comments: Comments on the described work should reference the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers number shown above and should reach this office no later than the above expiration date of this Public Notice to become part of the record and be considered in the decision. Comments should be mailed to the following address: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ATTN: CENWP-OP-GP (Jan Stuart) • P.O. Box 2946 Portland, Oregon 97208-2946 Applicant: City of Tigard Location: Bike path Segment 2: Tigard St. to Tiedeman Ave.; Segment 3: Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Segment 4: Woodard Park to Grant Ave. ; Segment 5: Grant Ave. to Main St.; along Fanno Creek, Washington County, Tigard, Oregon (Section 34 T 1 SIR 1 W; Section 2 T2S/R1 W). Project Description: The proposed five trail segments consist of a 10 foot wide paved pathway (shoulder is additional). The five segments are, from north to south: Segment 2: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue-0.26 acre wetland impact area; this segment has a bridge over Summer Creek Segment 3: Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park—no wetland impacts Segment 4: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue-0.05 acre wetland impact area; this • segment has a bridge over Fanno Creek Segment 5: Grant Avenue to Main Street—no wetland impacts Segment 6b: Main Street South—has bridge over Fanno Creek The wetland impacts will be mitigated by enhancing 0.9 acre of non-forested, reed canarygrass- and meadow foxtail-dominated wetland located in the floodplain area east and south of an Oregon ash wetland forest adjacent to Fanno Creek, on the Fowler School site in Segment 2. Purpose: To construct a pedestrian/bike trail to provide recreational opportunities Drawings: Nine (-9-) drawings labeled Fanno Creek Trail Permit Additional Information: Additional information may be obtained from Mirth Walker, Fishman Environmental Services, 434 NW Sixth Avenue, Suite 304, Portland, OR 97209-3600, telephone (503) 224-0333, or by telephoning, Jan Stuart, Project Manager, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers at (503) 808-4381. Authority: This permit will be issued or denied under the following: Section 404, Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), for discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States. Water Quality Certification: A permit for the described work will not be issued until certification, as required under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (P.L. 95-217), has been received or is waived from the certifying state. Attached is the state's notice advertising the request for certification. Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation: The impact of the activity on the public interest will be evaluated in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency guidelines pursuant to Section 404(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act. Public Hearing: Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Endangered Species: Preliminary determinations indicate that the described activity will not affect endangered species, or their critical habitat designated as endangered or threatened, under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 844). Formal consultation under Section 7 of the Act is not required for the described activity. 2 • • Cultural Resources: The described activity is not located on property registered or eligible for registration in the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places. This notice has beenaprovided to the State Historic Preservation Office. Evaluation: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the described activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the described activity must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors, which may be relevant to the described activity will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and,fiber production, mineral needs, consideration of property • ownership and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. • The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, state, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed,activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. Additional Requirements: State law requires that leases, easements, or permits be obtained for certain works or activity in the described waters. These State requirements must be met, where applicable, and a Department of the Army permit must be obtained before any work within the applicable Statutory Authority, previously indicated, may be accomplished. Other local governmental agencies may also have ordinances or requirements which must be satisfied before the work is accomplished. 3 - UJJ A B D E /. `� E G H V J ■ Jd�� ��Lf96Y�I���<! LG�L1l� I■� �.tm.�:4C:ut wa r saY.Si I FNb', R�"• `•, •, t, f1�i1.:.;�♦:,� , A � Sv,14x �t� SY A L1'g eo• - � �A WSNlRGT[W - r. SY :IaCN [ > -�: - � CV(IVq't^ r' _ ��^. 70��1 t �i•'' ,�' S •'t'� •� SQMRE J tlmrn a w ST / I4 2J d 1�=1W1U = 5r L ; $Yi f"EL M C I .Q!rns i t• 1 Fir c ► W •. - SW C ARCRES I. `� - _ `•slT z- ' 1 5 ;St �!'�pc IlAQ CFNFfR F I ST a I 4 NUBE_P. $1 j� �' R['qp t•y + ■,,,b y e600 7900 7soo 000 n c -e,r v' sa r- , ��+- �) fqM S • v � fSr pY'p��.�i • ,��':t�, ' w:A. u �� C,n 7 �,TNUT d ST f•':�.. SV � 6600%Sr!.O[t�rf N Sr a y, , � g AR.. ... E s `� s.. , ;:ar,•,ca:o. I r > sY n 1' Fa o d�. �/,•.>�.,r a 28 rozel .4y /� ije, ` < 000: LOLA •'SW�' 6.AL E S7 Si K S4 FRED Si b, / y : gin S,•, �, • I< SYdP B A SW Ell•NEIO Sti .. . um (`a w'`'tiin0 � 'y d!' •'tIco r, > " / 10 ���.7 BORDERS �L D-- : I i Sv 1.11 }Y Nf•r, rp,IKfIU�F',Id - y ta ■.n >r Y •`!I i:. 2 9100 aroo-7f ♦ 7700 �'i€ AIR SA VCMNPAy �� s� u�t,ti S y _fr urnr t l ♦. •,ta r, �;:: IPt7r, ., SW CM R. ,•.�.'• S C,{Y /•�V I u ... `� 0. r ',,,:7 C. '>- .SW .LEMAN' ST t0C ST h' :., , .LN• ,CT q1 gW\ \eaRD ,•pH.. '^` '� g w n .N., S� +D' F:T K 6ROVL, l;92, 6"[.'Ct;,,;.:T,; !`Y� Ni j Q•rp��oe •r ,^'t+ 0. � ,�,� ?' :0 '.•.CEM�i i Aa SW CONES� •..,t§ }5h , Q dpSW'rl'�CORRAI J uatx 30. ST "ill :' ... •t? �•4 L ,Mj!... LANDAU®_ . _,�ST a EST von r i w■uy x "'I W fC no SY 7. N70 0 tl0.�' �e-!M1{L- :(5' S ' i .t'''{;ik::>. ��,+;+�] G LL'1� .,� 'SY lOt < €�:t E_ _ ��. i.v.1 �• G . L" r i •RBCN a lY ( -RD;,. ,r;r.fY lwlmAi f�7 "V ® ,,..„t. li;,ST L' � '." / u 1 vFw c�.I '1� tr:'�' 3GX4 err.'' +'�_ f. '�'tii^1,1: ,+. '4 a , I� < E — !• • I +, a u h S.. +.y:. 1 '.-' !► EIEAF S T 1' DK a� -,• F� t I ' f'7 .,t.. .F.:j.t, i:F5•.. ':4ts s, y MADL s. d we �' S / 210 7' ',';'!„i. ;4'�P:- '+''t' 1LY\ �s�'�♦/ v _ ST o �e° . `.s:'1° Iv. A' tl F HOL\- ;'a„u,x;„ . :, 1 ': . fi C ~35 :i.217 N'ol 's{%5., ,z_�v,�•® 3 �I �� a •aAi[f� 'O ; '""" �,® r�I ` • ....' �< Y fa ' t .y.,: .\� OAK �_ ^ d _..; sr_d•.n d 1i5 :GREEN1,44..., 't, L: , s - ` �•� .v5 79r' .. �®�I© ,d c1 '//••_.}I :�� yR `w c;+S rxru,' � . a 1 a + : rf - ,�:lti �C�-Yf REEA7 of L•''¢,s ,� PINE �� „�N �_� /� 'x AL . , if, :: r gCAN.',+ti L 4:� � iCi. 't'A!J' • a�' `.-©®® h^' l I� •ACAQ Ai_ 4,:21 0z� E N�GND k5 ts;:< a ari`:ra Wi " ma 4ir, a,,' PI 'kK' qrr. ®� �+ /;/ a"` sY -cDrowosr'iE,A- E �.:t#'e�Y d 33-y >5.uta 'e 1 x A ..ICSa'R °' 1h,. StIADY 0 is .,o, , �_� II'' -\' . . ,., A•. ,� :9 1t- ." c +}W :' i',..^ y�;; �/ Sll i •ryl P. T7p 7. �. 4 • SY-v A T' y�': A `'fm's'i 'yt'.'€•,uiraj. ',•� r �O � 1 ^ qc:., :'tit.i:,���CG �:{YL''SM': -r.�'� � ��,{1 5�'''>$M NII. 91., .K•r f,•��t,:'�'r. ':"'.I� �' i al<��t: � S7 ��•E: O %' .:�b *I,, ASS�I! .` L,NGST 'A 'y -:1;''''..'-"'d" .'ic`*„t;x .:.i•., '/��. ..33 R 11._' _� ��r€t” ¢°1 A. 1 '' .�L- 'I A 'y «r 1 I�� a}�a�i f r /f♦�31. t iii. 4+•c:B'iY r •1," a •sY w ... . .r, T`. . Q,! s ` .? /, Sri '� �. �, � 1y - 6 ,�M ::�Ai;iiu;';: "v ��; ;; ,•. -F!T`T4%T .a,',. •. pprox, Trail Ali nmen e�`,r` .< 7 °�. I ;d, ,,,E�` $� .,.,.: L .•; t L,,•.yT,,-4i•t s�.- - �. t }� ,..-d.,�,;,. J• .<^!\ I� rn' .J ,i'.i'e.,:7",...7,.•i�; ?i".c''v �,LL Y� `r'i yv j•.TTS.'_ 3?J% t�� '"7,risr',A ?' � °$W•.FAFF E' zi ti ' ALUr.4 sr�' 1L� , ,;.; •,,,,s .}I;:Y d JL:c -; A `' :. a :J 7 f ,c ,1 '^a,f• .�•: v Cr i 7 I !r �A v0! 5L, rp'aTS`1" � .,v •t. 11 TI ."-'1'' 'c ,Il .:t -: ° ,;;,,5...ti�. xi# ,; %x > <ST;1 I SW HAINES :,".. ∎. ` ^ ,�,rd,I .p -r .'!7'•.\ ^ . ,'RIDE i. a ' � _ S �� - f ,C•,• 't \' EYI e '' G A +•.•'^7l Y 1 _.< 0 6000 p 4' �''I r�`.•,Q ,. u d_ k r' d e �' (� jr; y'QP � • a. ± K • : _!6 �� :4,41.- 'r.Ltai s(�pr''1441:4 .p ">. �' I.GAR, `` -�.. r SW,.BAY , +'� "•r,;� �i, lin AC�•a., i R.N, <&I G m , .At,c I av,' .r�S �,�` • •∎•14 L Ai 1 ':: 7000 ,I wl ,�!' -'�' 1 , •'��j .•�aL g ^•re;, %:;%.- _ ,S [ i ;�Y Z w•' :Je • yM1,S'1� 'C.'J � ` '.Y r E•I; {i' •pi. { `�fAi, _u 've ss i• .� � _ sAls 56�y �� � __•_ T S_` , ����. 's e� .9� ���Y \'� �y s,v':> sw': tt 'I® ^�i' r � ° '..a i ,.-,.y 1,1 �,."q'�' • �aQ► aa�i. _i / '9.1818 L^ i/ •A -��."�::ta' ,a .7!. (.M1 'ru i v. --...f.,.,,'.,•••-•,..., rY;s[ri�;r 1I.,K1f-•r •�`" HIV' / E.•s ' \ ... ' •+'.,;,.. .y,!,' 77 5""PIn.1,!\fir- ...- c,..:.•' _II �., s aN `':.Z iii 7 a v 17 •�a -',n , (i w {.i.t.i,r{'';t4„-,,� f.t .,,..'i-' r Pid� I' EL•+.r )�"�^giria.Y DL�S.� �ni� � t' ;'_ Li ..,,,; .'A I"�•'••!E/ ::C� •XiD sr, .' }�•p.NrW� '• 1`�•... '�6V � 8 311,1. '� �!, ,,�. .?,yTr.�JJL y%t�t', E�RSi 1�-'$<; a kE9./21 �� l0„0 �r,. 7ti : .�0♦ r „5T1j'HElppSp. yy r� tq,, [ • r�•n•_ .P 111 -116,E dry i "• a.•9�. e ,' AA 4 '18 ' 4�r•.: ® t, CRt[R:!A; <SZ /;r ''!P• r1; `'.', " p f.' r.• r (Yr SW -7 NKa• N "Y S4 ERWL ST~ Mp. ,Rr' •C 7 e :::::::,','..'1.-,..1'.d- .I 9.?: �'�� ;;tr "2:\,./-� �� ' Sl� ;ZiY•fr L LIN � Dlw 'tL ��LP � 11 _ � � P �s. 1 `l�. eJ ,,pp ))r '�"��J�,,"�a..±7200. f RR: .$i.. � CT,Q � Ci 14," °` �`i:{. IC• E ;;.+ ' QI' 41'it�.. 4KiS;, 'TE7fK..e '•.�IF1E SAT eaKS 6 y�Qi I ANT � y�Su t': � �,N.'�. ,'�f � �y �+ gip.'; K'ri!?• 3`,�. ? � r';�'',pY'= GOH2aW � -'fir e E �,5� r+1 tll+t1 13200 f .1800 LA - A_ L s •..44, i� �: 'FU4 >,. •••.l ,NI -4.• SV .� M'.:1."� .. f. 7,.. !,,,,,,4E 1.T. F .. C : t J' q SW t 'I 1 ' ,4.0 .R ;4. I -"1 rY� 'r1 ?r 1' llY"i.: Y 1 - •,..+7�.SW,.H (� t' I ,� a S4 ALBERTA ST i G .I y �� S';T WTRI t! 1'• wnt tt� r, v`�. r:{., {R� hANP 9�® "E.,r' " Y b; l' �s':� ';, ,'••';rN y:;'�,1.:::Y; $ r :t r_A.d "r C-'. ..,aL •a;•�asi'f,",.,V,?:v ''i''•'v. .34-:lt It �' `R?1...^> 't11.0. 0 Syr:.. �,:t!' .r.-:.'i • ' t` 'l�1- ■ PARa' r ��..r_12100 k9 -_ <_; .rr.- ' '4•ry4'.'l,, 2 r• *41',, '� ' IOL� .?0 -y it0TT xuw n�• 0ililt[I►7S� ' ran'S4 HARION S•D .�, a ,..: '*.e 1 '�V fit# ) i> J:7N 'ti I trk 7,z.ruxcr ',g 'Q C;,`a: 0 .Yr' .c`,' ,..„... •-�p,��I.ee.0 Iii.f,�til r��,e ,.. . tv.,�1.. Sj"'< -1 -- ! pz...s I r ■_ �'' r `dal�f.,,w ¢•11• . $ .j:°- 4'�' '7 r .¢ ry •F;•uy�=%, '�.�r.Y��, •3, "�” TiO ,k• .',�. 2r' i rl»ti 'YRUSfoPr ...'� J-''''' d :st.i..•' `tI::Ri` 9'< ,L``' _i n' tem•,'6 - .1: •,(..:4,* i .—, t s '," .a El M7tFiRf d\I P�. a auvEx.' us ti q r. y Ai.•* ,Zi. A4- 1;44,;1,21' .` • A _ :a g I,- o -7 '` " + in 'b Vtr. 1• '�'RF,::. M1 •L. „.„y�' •.-e-,r fl$�Y Ts r 0'7 y. 3 a` SW n_'d`.' I ":64°•-" -.'. 'ems ✓: _ �'cl..l ' '1■ '„„..v�:.(L" __,�ggnee .d •... rI•a _1.1jk 7.4+},:r -''-, 4- jt}li DBURG .". i -G <, cr sw` r. .iS "ann' C i I'*' z 0r ERR .d'S \: , F. ,SW t'EDGE [� Y:' i j•.` a l�- '};'- _ ` �'' .t :.':.,Ytsq'...".i�'� c.���.9\t�9 iv ry EW000.- .i3Y:sAt �otlR''A,, t � bt- -...;,vr. �.,1 •otr.r 1,g.., en-0.1 _ I _ "isi. _ . vl[1Lo T,CT: T s. H 11. 'a• _ Sy' :.. , ,. M ATIi.: ."9 ,�''' .''t.t�t`.ST ` g DARKV•ay :x. z sr Q sT NnLVta �' EI', 7,''r. t=AAA ;`', rb«:: 1', `,c.r 4 i .N .e w • 6 D IQ,® 'MI 1.• 4.,.,-..•M t a''' :. 4 l y ..� .Yim,Es g��1I■m�I I CDOND . ':� ` fiOR.. ' .kt}t` ��17alairY■C' o'DE ®®��g ®®��AEF>1f>> ®..,a..ail L t'• +1' ';t� a t - /Ii� /� • _ rpa •v N T �tr.'p < i.,. .e- YY.all ,' `(yL ,ji,.;L' E ',i SEST.' tc�.Yli94.. • 6i �• 7."r R,,. .,. �' �� ►y "r v i 1 r I .1{'' ' Av:'>YAM t 6 -%� t s 4.'E'.1,Ty , 0.4-i:,.:. ;•'7,. ,r, •a:�.,_ :r ''!•,141,7 4,:,• ;;i „vr< %1 •gi,:.;1„, ,, ek tWb ','(7 . .+,: "*.,,,41„: w a!j: -/, I I M _ _. : ;yr�'e't,r: Gt•• � �§, 't�,y,,.�p�A t w ;yq� may¢ R' > f:Y!?:• f rid- •�.4 �"y�e+�si 7tF THE" C ' ,��":�'� ?� d°r,";-r,�5. y.. .,,, •� ��" ! F a AC;ri j -- Rp_. a V �1a. 1; S z e' yV":I A :;:' }'1` c'.!0::. 4C';,,11, .r' t-q:. c' o n,a ,t,. °€ mip,;45., , ',A• -i' . 9,• rl- v s'_•' - -'�4A7fR - a�---- \ 33 R: �s �:.f-.. �' Sr 1 'fi G - SV 41t0, A •� .K a �• � 9 Y. J .yO' A' ,1,: •a VI a .7t,rc: r ,n kG3,.*.,':" 7.7,'5qZ 0.nr;x:d p Jai Se S ,y; w'; - '� �'-0,�CaE� \11 �laC „pd < -s' �8�,��:-8�1 �C7' it viii.;:aa���RD I”' ,,,,,,.:•,: +i ' `Y�i •.;r.•• 9 s:�,ppst�'dE Tt'::. .. s:..'BONITA` t{'RD � •$4 DONITAI '� ■ • ,rd < A.A,:UL'LT'= ..': NTAIN�" 111,•' Ey�y,LE. .A0,,^_' -.: 4, ti l F 17;111?",;:3;:e , ta,„,,. +"....,. i§d,F' +;e900 _ = 6000 L. -J: 1i• fi• ri.. �' Y 5000 4 L o , .,r!t• .:.'.CEII ; ..... 3 4 dP S pct yr LANG L•r _ -�s /s ■ liu i7�6lEL� _. 6. 1`a T = q t > � y't, <�� .`1 r% ) ..' �d LN F(r ` - sMl rt.�ESra ,. `1Ut: 99W: `1 • d, 1t .•4 Pii:'I pn;4< y6 7f IX, "•' J`' x.' RurdIta!.''i Q, ...��'Y /r _�., ` '0.-1-4. AaY' •"' 7,v: ,sl". • is .>,•.•, n p., V r, i,Y+ Ti. � , p ri.y O !Vi " ^I ` 'So_.i. ,, 4,�y, '..t;r> G:.�d�y/5dalIEI;i i.'• A, •�SI1 . .. ; o a .., l',11:.A d it , +.. .: •R„f,:, . >F=.0,1E't 3 SW B • I `RD �; ,,,•• X51• `� I /,1•4100,91. „, CT !Y.lj7r•I t 'NMI r'tj h. E b's 't sv'8 i, ', : 4i.'• .N;JJ.'S �^ ,�.P '✓ y e i.'+ Gr, :'� ;•�Yt?•ti f•. 1, n 7`ks;f•.a '` A'nt'i z:TT” -b.,C"r5Y•.�1��� rSS' <}• u-. 'R.�s?...;n 4 .:','�.;� •^ S• tI L SW S1OKESDEAAt RD , a,€ w.Yn it' u'i. 1 ',,,fc7 ,.. .rt.t. .Si a q.t.:FSI ou 10.CT S• BQ 7', _ "•t ..•' , "1^-'^ 'i' 0 •� ,. r• ;.. .. A Vii('■ .8 •rp p "y?14/ crfr'Y -irx 14MER D.,1''Y•"'a • ';{r,`� Be ''', ©, �f,.F±L;i• :--,SW' �..rr '?, ', S�• fl i n r 9 _c�0 a ': .' ,,11.rt:,0' 3. } ff��°p R[Ydas' {t 4r(¢.. A ♦s,wd '� �hYdio`�° BLE +'z} �N':i; 6 t c 1 p0 _ ` Rf•t“;€40%• .y •rST..'7 f Y 14•"' •Y �E�f�3', s .}Y, —6, 'y �� 4'rv, . �,I_.HARRIND'fJN „� 1 A• q� i ^.t•S'2' y3,er, '' sUk` P .c?,•' �- 1S�' s4,� r..;i •✓�. Ir •F, Fanno Creek Trail Permit • C .P.:,,,-1,..,' ,', , '. i `� , , i,. �W ',«, :; �,a '' : ,' ,,.';' :rJ' o - s . ,. ��� .�'!Y l.C..btr.• a eF_iiV'••'.7..::a? q e::qr °," i sv svn NI Sheet 1 of 9 1 1 /98 ^ f ., 4d-/'-,•`•47- -- ' Sheet 1 Trail Location p e ra {c+ `" ��� °''!`inn° Lt""" ( - / SW' DURHAM ..:.t r+ -. Irr. '+a-ISJWr• . —. . • E' ,s 7 A 7 r �I o a I KHAM� R�iy ._ --i- _1----".. ..�_ _ __ n tr���''A I1 :'7_ aaa�[vst�.����- � ¢ ' �.' .M I � j Ti.,,' � � 7-_,.., •A7L.rar7/� ,1�er.I NE:r��rgal 685 mho®Ga�■O®_ ®�.�� KM M=7 ",—'Td� _ . .�__'' SEE MAP ti ;f���GE III rj.- 1 ; ..,;tt RM R«.Sy nee - • l' Ban«a. re.l.leR.d • I'm.eCww`RS a /44"1671 sip ,,04 f}R�i-0. R. I • J 1¢C '.1" / '/ �•. •,OLD toYia." ::1 1 c •.. c..^„' w1 e� RS I Ste Fen e:.r -7-..7.;„iiii A 1 I I 1111..�. l L. r' ... i I I 1 Construction « O +�..� 1- 1 Boob Y`t-KS11. • •'d I O - 0 ; I 0 Peg C.t.l.. \:.::..: i !r•ulxe••1 \ as r.. \• �— • m. r' !_ : wETLAN p M PAIT A lac --� `'� , I 10.01.!1 ,^ 1�it -- '1 \ 1 I\ifi GPM.SU.1 hl.-lea, . .R I 11 P. I 1'•�r,\ I M 1 \ `\, \\O' I i / /�— L/ \\\ \\\ turn Table I I I' ///-- I \\ \\ c .Y. .Mn tR P.P.tR ale . nl • !+ I I % j I \\ \ ' Ie.li Ia00 •r-ls-!! aw + i� 1 ' i • \ Ir\��/ /i I \\ \\ tt�v �s�•r� I I J� w -'MM 'Qazc"ais JSSI. \\ t ' \ MOM I®�� I��-Lt. I MUM MIMI 1•1: Ei5.091111FO:7=1 f ( t.)�®��• x...:77'.7:11 fv O t y' I `3 8011 R¢1 I \ \`` i t4�Warn=Cli 1_ .3 oil. q .S..:e vliis., S�c`y w 1 / MELI♦EErCF>t�(aFET7 e■ , ' P •docc RiRiis,' \•1 \\ \\ % / I R�" �/e .. Re. / 1 LEGEND L III I 'OBEC RS)33)• I \\ \�\ •4\O Y«.wl 1 1 RRiO'OCQ"SP• \ . Ra' \ \ ® Y.U.MI.1.rl Me. _i_ 1 1 LMT.:OCOrn�a...RO ' \`\\\\\ • t4j4I4 a•'� UMl.M.1l i0 pSNRa• \ \\ \\\ t 1 , \ 5CC Q"COPPER \ \ ' CeM.A.r Me-2« !.». ! 13�] %v�L![[/.}w d C.. ,\\ `\ \ \ ---_` 1 4 1.4 Essig d utructbl URA..I PSNRB' `� tt � •p/[R.0 Y...M \ I , li 1M1101 \ • .)]'ben Rae \�--_`` ``` K 14 N aa�a ' tit4 1 41,r_./ki I R( \ J MOTE: SIM�b.nM w s.4.e1M M \, \ \ M.w-151!••SI.Mat OHMS 1112N Me Sl.r.e , \ \ I ------�a.'"'..n.� M.M.1M NM n. m..o R.uws \\\\\\ aril,• '��Sr.Os 1 411 STEEL POST DETAL C.Y C_s.5 I I �� — ' r.......- .< 1 - , \ Fanno Creek Trail Permit \\� \''' -,' a I : N II \ Sheet 2 of 9 1 1/98 � -- — _. -- r, \ • 4g..• ",,, r .M FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 2 TYPICAL SECTION I1„ TIGARD STREET TO TIEDEMAN AVENUE M.r.t. - ...LL� LAYOUT Sheet 2.. Segment 2 Trail Location and Wetland Impact and Bridge Over Summer Creek sr.,, aTY OF T"0"l;.";;x":R�"'` Tar M¢ lw�o.c MA K: I =a�:-. 1fr - le\trw\I/Mr.YYal�wc yL Iq Zcr • • / / / I 1_ _I . • , / , ..t _ MEADow STREET A - 0. / _ _ N R 957son�1.123 I I I I 1 (77159119751 A 1A Uhl AC ' \ O ee..n � 1 ! ,�/ �„ I I I 1 • Z Curve Table e ,iq'a 1 1 ore me sepq(n) man.(n) on. horol(n) • 8�m 1 71.19 10 121T'S71• 11,91 ,!+ Mar Y.1.R p �..o..e,.,..4 w. o. •= 5 x590 » aart9' I9.a ` 'M/ •\v.���.yyat•oo -- =a.ao .SAnS.I.ao ———— 1 rn,�a —3— a..ax » )r.rar' xa91 /'' /.a Ab . .°• ��1 —-- _- 11.05 , ,;. ' �1� ——--_—-- 740 » _ fxSlbO' 7L01•'' ' .• as e."„tl i l' I..."" :,,L.1rz.. NAP,.rw. �( O• I ; -- f�.`»s�• I c.nuaa. I ri 095-0 / ,'�, S«ICp tern %n .a .40171t272 yr• ` 161ReN.l t awlM[ 11 ' g4. ' `1tq M7 L .,Se, R. ♦ I I lots a oaiiit�i:•l I I \\ �� q A Cwl.w. /' \ W I \'b I I --�,J I //}PN 1 It All W Arun 1 \ (s ' aDC.Ce�nl.d' 1-M I • J/r1.sn SIIwI I 1 ` Bw°r 1 . 1 1 r",1"-aged.tiv47-, 1 �• 1 ii.,444.4,41, 4 se..A . 1 1 11 �'ttflR,:- .bf TO 's I L- -_—I 1 91 I I • I I \ ` ` r;; :15•40 \ \ , or..:=74...• :,(444c,f, tira • s/9•Ye RW 1 i 'elm.r w' �1��,i: Is, op.Ihni°. i:.°rm.. �/er.�a r... • /A�er,,iw •I I. ,. d :.,' ° r Mr 2�a:�[:,.r : a9r yaw I.• I �r �9 _ !!_. ... .. L.3 1/�•,,�Yen Ref Iiir/ / �. ► ,. hC / / ' ip alrr°�� �O � OI� ��� _�1.r.Apt. `\ 11111141,St C.Y! 6nrn9 F Ls' s' s' 15 / A 0....14 n Ih.a oat MD�l� O 0 1 �� TYPICAL SECTION \`\\\\,,-- ---,,,t020,... "'.. 111= 100' \ Fanno Creek Trail Permit._- - :- Sheet a of 9 1 1/98 - Y.1.5. ; ;.., VAMMC FANNO CREEK TRAIL-SEGMENT 3 • TIEDEMAN AVENUE TO WOODARD PARK nil"°e �.-� �I10 LAYOUT Sheet 3.Segment 3 Trail Location "°�;,R Y.ACM( atr OF nc�Rn[Yw[wec 11 �nrrl ru Ra xw o.c Yr[: �x OrPor 3,69 • • / S, : \L`�\ rs,MYW I., 0.. s I LbJ - / \■ \ a N / . 7 / /� Imes �` r ��� repo ae4..,s:.,. , i r MS!.l¢e!l 1 t c N e.0 o -'---/ • . 1 , \;\\ ..,,,,itik.0- . \ \ 'Z32 '• /4' -.-.L...--,4.--------- ------•• — / 47/ • /.., it LEGEND ; .0 �..� ►j�i� t1� 0 +�Ir �o \\/J� �'•i �i i ® ..u........,w.. \\ \ O do-'), ►� 1 f _`� a -.d`��'.�, \ • , . \ -- A...120111iI4V. A pfr.. et.f_cr. ..) Iii,, //'\�/ Ire •, .3 ;4:.34 �/11,. r.`.. ���'— i��/ '�i'' b�dV a�� �� , ///,'���/��/�i/, •ar I / /I I Y C I `WeTLAND ""- 1,419/t<-1-ARa A � � • ifi Y� 44.3-,;/••-a•(lFJ r m 3/4•-41 / ,\ +O.R.i / , SECTION A-A I(1=Ippi /71 Curr. Table w N.:1e411.(n) .r:n CO) 0i.* m4.,,(n) ,,, so 374113 7442 Fanno Creek Trail mit 4414. w as�rx• fam . MIA w 55-2354• le f. Sheet of q 11/98 87M KO ,4x05- K.42 —1 5 41.87 7 24,s'Ir 4x40 - (r� !nw 103 x3.33«• 44.00 FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 4 44.414 m , :4-x'44- x.r 4� 14' YMNR I.NC,R[N A WOODARD PARK TO GRANT AVENUE `�+f' et1 iic LAYOUT diY a'11CAftD rHaaw":W=N(A, I.[Na f.o a.c MM.: � Sheet 4. Segment 4 Trail Location and Wetland Impact and Bridge Over Fanno Creek ` "M"`,;"` °¢`° 1..∎ .4,. I n 8Y-... an.- I e\t.e\,s44\r.NMO4\sot 1-1_7 • • • felt ;,; F • • ` \ r . ►T.11, 1 \III \ \_, 60 ' w ��� / N I� lire / / \��� / / u r\\ o ` r �w? ��s. 0 1 I � N/'' :y°....\�. �_ /� •11)8 I I� ........ / �..-.�• o ` . y. I u.... I End Construction 1 i ..../. I N 131137.4142 .n'4.•.. /•' ....r w nn, 444/�wn I (ril{2U.IIU • Jo%GM Caw Fog • /•t I .( � I a. 44.4.4.44 4/444 e l E€off c 10 • LS' r S. 2.3 1/ l'\[i 6W Tow 3...,C r.'«a u' '�'\\�4, I 1 ' /. 1�.e.�.5.1 t •ar....r n i na.._ •wn-3/4.-0•(T•{) C cr 3N'-a "y, w,li. 41, / -+ ( .w..�.... SceIC 1-- 50' ' drj a;...� 7 . SECTI9N —A ,//�--1∎• ;,\� ' :.rr— \ \/ •.44,.44 ::4:::".....•:: . / I \ \ :i 44•....44 .r• i�n�� \ • Curve Table .' .• '•••• ' .• �''�� Cu.144.-1.44414 ia (n) ..•0 PO 0414 30 Te.0.00(n) / /' ‘ / •� � f7/ ' =i 4 a un to Iooaao" Iaao �Q ` ' -^- 0 Is,, IS IOVC•JT 1001 /, •0 ,e ' ,\' /� O ISIS x wow N.M ��- .... O IBM n 43.)'40' LQ /� '/ ' /' ` 55 / M.� • 9 31.53 n 1.9/13. In01 '0 0 uw n a9a's• MIS /� i / VN / \ 0 3514 n 11,0'4.{• as4 /_- Z,•v► ergo. �n.cR�.....e o 11.11 n 4111474. {.32 - !� Fanno Creek Trail Permit / Sheet 5 of 9 11/98 • ...g:4,...'., II/X141(T.MIMIC FANNO CREEK TRAIL—SEGMENT 5 OCIWOWL yew. GRANT AVENUE TO MAIN STREET .iOF TjJ LAYOUT aTY O1(11CJW0 aaN[[aec acr.;nal nc nn x0 O c..,c: r3. .00. N.♦.4111 o0m� Sheet 5. Segment 5 Trail Location I� ) ,� = 0,41_ i,nr n,41,\,♦N.aS�,IT L1 • • • • • • • -.1 •••• '�Lurve Tobio '� _ c t/16-166.16(0) .wr n) 0.11. t.•••.1(n . tan 1/17 6110.7e• 7.12 tan 5 775[1 as J 1.127 01.12 127713' CS) nu 1 1171:01171:01.7. 18.11 61.7 017 amm• 51..0 . \ 06 WS? 200 751717E [.w r("000" wct a ono SO11c 0 /74 10 7067112' 9.61 -� 11(101/6.0 11661 12766 SW MAIN a te\`, • $ _ 011pi ...N `\ a aAIN -- ` '0._ 'I,\ (wc 111217��_-' 4T M.+8.t t�� .. . 8 8° ` `',�i`.`•` � -.i- 4 0611 t amsty∎N6tnwo ggab .■�' • _��7� e :76x s.MAIN huq \ \ y • 17'0.°cAc \\ (4111411101• �` ; `,k 41 x+1_91111 - .�- \ :��`� - _ Sri ,. / � �� �� %1�:r0 3/4*-0 ■,__ „,„......... _SECTION A—A [.mot ( 1611267. 1 •1111■•6 1 I'� 9 (r •i.r.y I \ 8 in I I � 3:x a UM /. I 00(611![O611611V.6: / / ,-e0.ca me 1E111 . 17770 sw WAIN sm[tt I (/j e .r i I III .11-10' • PAGE PI srza:Ns s 4 rzSrNS M6ttNt I ,1 7160 Sw ikWt6uM 712[11 t (.Mtiy O.vN I Fanno Creek Trail Permit Sheet_2 of. 11 X98 _SECTION B-a ...�;..' VINN�["1,I It�[11 FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 8B • AT MAIN STREET .u... LAYOUT '4 a: + arr OF 11CARO C11O4CMN0 0[1141711,1(111 r6t to xa o.c N6NC Om Sheet 6. Segment 6b Trail Location and Bridge Over Fanno Creek A "'°""w. Ntt[ I°° v. I "—"68. Z. E".;,, ay.6- te\[wgt6..v,....[\snt L 1 • E. ICI EXISTING PIPER'S WILLOW FOREST ijci.0461.4 ' : "PC aaa o i' C•(.171 Pl• \` AkeikA-�•lvr 4,t,°"°' I SHRUB ENHANCEMENT AREA _� I ':. I /R rte.)N m R.• f IOaV �j /i�J,.• COR C'w,�.r)S. •O(.CON tnOl' Cwr� t. C mml PS I A ��'f ,� :� w r •. -.�\�Rff. � crr'11��_. :/ iii •&:`ta Z.• 7 Bogil Construction ! .. .. ` ,i r 'r.r�.a.. .. .!.� � �O �' �,'�i��¢� a-in. R 0x1.0431. \ r fm•_\�`I,' •�„) t r U • 1 1st' I (ts131s...an ` .\� �`\1': 1 1 +�Cal sw..R ` Y \' �_ EXISTING OREGON ASH FOREST PROPOSED ` 1, I 10.0411 .��\ — --. !°'C.a.fa••Raa.-x.a, PIPER'S WILLOW III �it, ' ___ :::::ED FOREST 041 1 s r I■� '�, ° ✓ `\\ ASH I ' •\ \ 0, • 1 • I • \ �� I i I 1 Tca,••e"w ---�✓ / \�\ \\` FOREST III , , °i !� ' I I 1 i • • . • . . ' . • . • • .w...-(,KAlt- . .... ... ... ..t. 1 CITY of TIGARD • ' . . '1/151rjr. I .7.1.'4. .-... ' '1'7 . ilezit'..i..kY..:*Li".:.,1°{;,•,••.-.r..t,....,:::4.: , ..mi7,,,y- ..„1........•‘,..:.•----e_trztr., .... .,......t-.. 4:....,..;/...::::....:,:,, . II A. ab • •J'''7"'''.:•#,;14.''''. ••z...its...:k•;'- •••17.411100„.it •- : 'air.7 .',1... :4.--. ,.ig:• .4.7e'l:.r44,..*S.f.,,ket''''''.: -Iitti.V.,,k±!-:''S'4':•••Cr 44* 4:4"....; I.;;.6 Zte %•'4.- -..-..1',.. 4 :::!:-,.;,*,--... -',.,,,7.it'lt,..:" . -:,7-•-• i..A. .4..,.....16=6Fir.,.ii,,,,,..:---..;t,. ., r 4, -•''.':'*i'' „kelt',• i$-.14.;f'-141:1••iN,."401.yr,n, .0, .,',;:iter,v,ifir•,...,,.,;;,;1,4, „.,..4-.,4.... ,s„,....:. it,;;..t:,....i.:Az:,.?:;,.:..,1;,- -•;,....:.,.... silifslkel‘,, K-7, v''''%4,..*--.?4'i't,.. 'ar,-' ' f brA.'''; - fri;.:. '''.'"‘_,It' .• ?'''' • '61 4'. '' '. .: - i.-.■403e:Vk' '''' * •4 "•. !..'.?"SC', '--:1';,e__-- '•,--.44 - / :. '.7 ..':-••• - 1 Fowler School Campus ..iii.lin. ....,ii. . . • -- ,I. f„;),,,,v,; - •- -*.4.0...--iel :e■ .--...,.,.: 4.17,,ii,N: .,,,,-,...... , - . -. . 1,y,. . ......4,,,,,-4,..,„iv .. • •, ctg-.• • -•.-.-.•.---.-., , .,,..• .-. -,..7,,•.,e,-•. , ..','7. ..: -,--.?-•.-.4A..i.....• N- - . -;• .-,„ .7:-,t. ..,Ir... s,. ,..:g.:,,,,• • •-•.••-41.‘...z...-• ''',.F.,-.4.4-3...M:...P.-.&t, 'A.:-•••••,•• •!:.. r,11-.. -,-. ! ,... ..10.•!.;...•- ,fit .4.• ,.•;,..1,....., ..40.. vi ,.....4. -•,4... .,, ..y . ....i... /.. a, 1.4 . 7"'".. --.41":",*.. •• •t's*: '."'"7". .1"--16/1''• -'.. -..,..A,, - . -. . .-, Ii:,(4.-.::;., .,.....-.:41......t , •, .4.. ., ..- .,...„ , ,..,.....7 .4,1, Wetland Mitigation Projecl La". ...44`,.,. ...: A 41141:5i,•••ritt:34$• ..1.;;,,,itf.- ‘ ,........„, ,.,...4.•. ,,, .,..,„,. ,,, .„..,,, Wksi. ''"'I) A 11. - .4',:;,..1 ''..'.1/•,-"--.-....: -,...' l'fit sk.7 . .AM 1 ' •r :.- .... - 4, ' ' ...A!•,,c...;.-<:::?fri. 1:" Ai, . .i ....:4'."..V.„;:'!,;',,:i,t_.:.'..isit *: 4'....;.-;;:.;q!efti,kri,■.'7::.j': '"4".••• ''... ' ',:i.''' /'•.;...'e.' ; -- i.e' t' . ; .,•• 40 . • Tit • •44.•-ai!'•,: 4 'ke..?4-..•"d'..- t ''‘'., •-'. '.'--i.1: •.:.:::, ''.''.':4 .‘1,:: • t.••••,...fii11,11•1t€,;(:•4'.;%e-'0}:;.,,,,,,..."••• • 1-* - i.'r('c• ,- i• :.. - 1...t.- ., ''''v: • .,,;•:?le).f;••!„, .4,,„; .. .v.;..3..,„., ,.. ,. ': -4.. 4'. •',. •.' N' e.• ..A •--:: . - ',„.:0,.i........,..-...•;,,,,,,,,, . :.' i , t;0. „. ,, , ,,i.t. . 7.,.;,..t, . .. .,.. ,. ' l'.',..r.,.• . 0.. ,;•41•••1,!•.:;,, ,I''':.2.4i.,.,:/,‘, .-. -.•,,Vp,..44,„. •.; .....10,'„;.:-..-TV.,/ sfj4,1-',.1:,,,4-..,.• ,i'•,...:,-.:f..?"....7:,is.. ••:1::...,..... •.:•-.1- ‘. '...'-• 4.w et • 7,7.-4,.•••■ . ''',..••*. l•-i. . ''*.\••'-'•,••• . 7...'t4 `.1•47.%41::'-4 4*. '''-14414•.;•:.''' '''',4.4,-.-.'. . 11t.. 7.i:•..''7 •- •:*. °.ii. •••11,, N4.Vt'S,'.7;k1:;•,r.V..t..;.7 aeiN:?..447. 0?‹.;' - . ... ‘').......•,... ,, ..LiV''/'. •'' ':',.:;A• '''•,{..4.::-.. . ''.,.. '..7'4....,;.•.'' .7,'If."f.''"Af':'.. •-•• 7`1-- ils'4'(,"....;..-'•?i'•", h1,.i.V.,-..., ;,:441,0R.)':i•.**,,i,4,T..''' ...-...--:. •,!!• k ...,••,'t .2'... ;(... 7. ,„,.,-,ek,,,..:•:.:....:.,•,•t:i4-..f_ ... '. •:.i . .4. •4 1, 4T ....„I•. „ . • t.,14.4:?:1...golltg:.:.. ,;. .-., •-_,,...,•-.:...,tii,s,- t' ,k_ .,.hSp, .„X744•1.:: .. .. 0,4 '„te a;L i 'ic,:-• / • - ' ' '414 - iii*.' 'kJ.; 'i.,:,....,,,:•'.;.;€,-*--::"I't'irill.tf,c'-44..,.....liticic- ',?-t-iir..,,;,-,'' .. ..i. ,..egt• ./.. .f ,r1,6.......„. •:-.....4.40:. ....:„,...:•,:;,.... .-...,--4,4---I,,;;;„:-.7;.f'::j44%..41:. (4-S5-4.'''',4',';'..!'s" 144,..•''"elie• !ic.4''')-"'....4 : ' ....:, - • f -S, •:".' . .t,' ''''• V•I 1' .t.;,.. .o. 2...1,e,,1:1*'ir.'•'..- 4%; ' ,,,v, 3,1141.At'• h,.. 0 ri...;..,,-,,.:. ,,,,t,„x,......;.,,;4NiiiiitAt!.,,NsAiimpi. ,-,,........7.1...,•-',,,..i:-..•:-.,..,:li...-...,,,i. . i4.0.t.-..., :•.-•ce . .....„ --...•.:,. 4.•,,,1.,....,,;47,k,*4.05.0,. . ,. fi,- ,:-Vil.."...'' .. ' •.p.., - , . •- n, -.4.- .-0.,;.t71--ziiitiffiA?,;00.:4,„ , 2-s, ...,....-.;-:. .•" ,..:i:,....,...•.,-.•71,.......:k.,.. .A'11A,t• • *-els.' .77.$. ..&17,.•41 .•.7.. - .S'.4's:: •• . • *r ,, . N.,,,,t•:'.'1..., 7'4:1.4•...c.i) ..:•.,•).•..,...i,:: •:..••e......, ,..., -,...,...,.. ...• ....,.., . ,.,. :". . -.,_. . .. .,t.,. . ‘.,..,}......, .. . • • r ri• „.,,,i,....•. ... ,. ty..,..,....„ ....4 '.•:-7-,,..‘..,‘ ....,......,/..;,k1?-; :..,,,,.,..?:x4i,.:.;4.4.,3,,...,,,0..„4. ....,Np...4, ,.....4,,„,. .. • • • ... ,,, .•!,...:',...,'•44...11.;•?•$-.Is.......-1 0.., ..,.... ,7.....4. .i•bt v 4" ,.'•.'N1.!•:.r,' ' tic 44.•e.f...‘,',,.. ..,...0.•:,t•3•A...„.' .• •''•-' ''/V; .#1:'• '''• P.. •Z.... ---:',.,. ;•....,•.•4'''' .•!..I'L !!r,...,:wi4.,n.% f,..,•ffeitA.',4t.I ..' il.A ..41....•5':-..:1•:•.if ii '-'jF.0'..:t• ,'..$,. _..•.; ....1: 4. :. ....1 ,,110:: , 4,,,4`4: ,,te. ,3.••`i4,1,;, .4.6,, '• .5",••••••0.-,:.4...:....., :***....4;tee;.•Clie,...,,..S.PLIIII:t,14,6#07.177Y14.1,..A411;'•If.•••11., tlipiriti .. (•'' U: ../../.A.'W. -:.;;', :;...',•1;7_4' • 1.4 --‘ - •),- -•;: .- • 4,4--te-i.•,.,•,-et, '.' 4)'•'''r 4' • :- ' -4#' ; - k . • • .--;•,- ' ? - • - r''''t.. •- - -4.1 g 4 • . -' -; -1 - , ,„•,,t- 4. ,.•,--,, • ... ... • ,4•.•: , -- . • , '-- ' .--; -• 1: • • ,::::,- ,• ."- . ' • ', •:?,{.4. ..., _kk_.,..,.. lid ...,..,.,, 1., , „„, - ..,,,..;.041 -'rok• U - ,. Y ..,..tirs47.--., .• .c ,,r- .. . il •:-• •.. -..„„4.4..-._.. .. .- :.....,,..-•;-x!,...,_.e.,, .:. .- .,..• , "-- '-'•• `. ..; -,•9:- Nor 4 ;a- •,:' .4-'A'.4:'A.-."' -...'• ' ' ,4•"''''••.'-'• '''-'''' 'IF&'•• - • t i if.,, 4 '3•.••-•' • •.-f."'-. ' • ,"701- • 7-Z .,-„,„.41..,tr.TI,; 1,,, •....., .4.,, 1 .,...,::,421X,,....5-er..,. ,...,44-.4.Y,,.t' . •. .••.••••• .4....- ',.-.,,r• q :,, .w ,iww4t...• • 4, .. •• . ..,.. . r A , its.kc'e a."' !S., ,:....474.1.' ' .. • ...i..,,,,eger i::0..9,... ....,:',!.. ' ,..,4„..714;,1 ,..v.i.:4.,:ta .i.: u.-.•`.., s•::,. . 1. ' -74'1...ii.:i ii;441.7 1 ,.... . ,...„ . , . ,..,-.0.-. . ...,,,......5„,.4 f .. e..,., ,,, ,,r• • . -.0,.... 10.1 , .. . ,,.1.- i.`k, Ilt, I rAIN.::.jr.r. y1/44 . • 1‹.4 :,^e-: -' -;.A.3,,:-.:.!.,.:. .: . ...7. ',5.4„A • • • lol‘tri:, •:.' 'Pti.411-1 k.• ,., '4 -.4'4V:A ..);;5'7%,..:..i'_;44;45;tery.(4 - 4e•ii'?" jtt•-,It.,.. •, -g....,:.•5,•.,,... • , p 11 • '• ' 0§ .;,'.1:4"4'i• '.1,V'''',P:kr?: -,1'....ra .4; 441?..?..11".4::.,.•144. ,,41.144;A,L,i ,',...Xir' '•1 - .... .'..■ .;•-•:•_____,_,41,14. ',..:., ,,,,;•;•,•-4-.-.- , . .. .A' •:,.7ES kirlsci..41,Z1i- .t.:41,-"'...;,.,.'. .,.01,4.,..A 51i... 711'1,4.,633 711.1:;-,.:: ,)7,..,-,ir,..'Ts'••••"....,-:.i:;y;t;p:'4....:. .7.144:'.r:71,_.fe..1 ,.r 41::. 4'** ':..'" ..."! 4'..1"''. : .....71‘11..4!;''4.:'''' ''...‘':-.... . 4. -.' '1 4ke' ;:s .Z',.±".1., ‘;4 77f.t&17.-g74' *-.4 f'gitl!!_t,,tkif„,.;,iii•;._#,..tV't '4,?111..:,,,‘.'.•- ..p:r.'31?''-' • .1•''. '*' ' A ..i.e.t..v. - • • -,4-Aiacs) • -. ,-1,-,..14 $4-.1,4.iff.*„;:,,.."-.:,0-,3,5.,,v-p.T.ip .„.94.,,,,v, i,e,:,-,.)-s .,.,x0...i..11,4%,--,i, p.1.: .....i0,..,v...::....-. .,,,..,. - e•,, -1.,..: . •ilftelg,t44%,.,,1••., fit i3;; •„-- .,i", tsi-itii„, ,-7,..7,.41.;;,t;t...,eni-.;•At."1/4...-4Z,6:4,;31;;41"..4" e. 1,1.174... .. -ik .t.,..,.. .,:%..• • ..,: • ....i.,0,.. ...: ______ _____. ••,...-,:-: .:__:,„..-.:.,•,,,,,.4,...4,...0.,,..,„,f..,. .,:. , -.4......„-...„I„ .,:,..,,,..z. 19,,,,r-,,ri.:,•::.1,...:4,:t ..,:t...„:.,,,,..t!-,...,,..,-r!,•••,,,f• , ,, 4,_• , ::.=-44...., ..:.,.. • .,;•-Te!..- ...,... 4 ....p....,,..:1,..1. ,„,..-?0, 1),,y.f,.?" 1. ...,Jr• ek.• r, ) ., - * .- . .4...-ip.. . I .,:•.,..,..,. ...•,..m.11.4.3,-,-,-.1..le.....--_•.. 2•,..4. ,N•il 4..4::::.,,-;...-1-2,-4. ,..c....,,A6,,,,,36,- ._...%:_ ,. ...15;,,,4.:'&1?..:4,1'.-s..-4:,.. • . . A '•- ...4,.-.',•••*,.4:.:•.A4 •: .!,,•..- •.:..," . 77.--,.'• ••• . -1-• litk5twi ff'40.-• '•,`",‘,if.'■:::fitt-1".2"1: J.C.,...9:.:45'17,''PIStie.'4,`!ktiX4:-.'0,74itpo.:..Zto..7•,. , •711,.,, ,.. ..„,le.:'44/"i-','...- ; . ;.. ''''''. •• '' .v.,-,-".... `.-.:•:-:-... 6.,... 4.5..'' .,•,,:7SP P ''').r-''-t..:,- 1-,..;,V.rzz,...Air,",,,.V .44•4•.g•tt 34,.. e ,.... ., .>,1;,./ „,..t,,,,.#, 1,..,..4. . . ....,4 .,, ,... ... ,...,.i. ,' '•..,-'•.."4.licr Ilk . '.:;;;:','•, ..,:,...:4, •,-,!..•••_.t•!.:!,,P All,: •.. 4., i.';•;••;,"?..*:::Nqt,'.,..,.;:;;.,',,,,k;•, ■ ..i.r.1';::."Are•..,..; .t.'1-; 5*-14•,..,••.'` ..■:.1 • , ,,-,.- ."."V.C.;,-,,N. ..?-,. .., -, `-. _.;,7t7 .. ,V, .:.. ,, •,:e';',.;. • ''''t j'..4'14' '''''+•'" - "(.',-5-vkl'el';',1",-: "Ja.,.":71.1%..E.V.,Wq.i.r..A.:.oi.x.tfe...-i•,..r:'.,,.,it;-..` :.,..'P,-..... -'4,..,.-714.4-t.93.1" "1', - ,Sle, ,....' 4 •■ •! ..,... Fanno Creek frail Permit • ,%,,,A,4;1.4,1;k,";'',,;,,IP,Ii.4„?..'et:"--ir.:;‘\;,itii4'''..c.:(;!:1--- Jle, . ';'.9.-t!4'..,0,'4,.: ...i.da.-::.S."-:',4 •-•.,,a4'.' -•., .' .•.'.. :.: -".'"..:•,......'......t',.7.`"4,'T. '4.;.•• • .-..t:.2 - : ;•••' .4 :14:1‘.1.,,rizt..,,....e s5.,..,,,,,,i•-•,•.,,t;.,.....74-.:4411v•rs:-P - ,;.7'•,:t,,'.; .,?.:".t..tefrys,.4'1.,14:;7/7.11,,f111;;;Ta::1.'''''.1.4.-.1k.--.2-4•-...: 7.776Ifsi:..'•..••..'-:-. ...4;:.'"'' 's 17. ' ' '4- or Sheet 9 of 9 11/98 i?.....o.'.;:i.141•:- t.;:''-'.t'.d4?4t's.T.r,.`: ' .. .- , ,f,..i Tpi :, ...•:,,;-V.-4:-%-,,t-4 • .- qr -,.f.1.-..!-; 1 ..:T.: . .,.., . ...-„--, P•••" ?'77AS'..:''-' 14,4 • ••,•. .., .._....„,....,.,:.„,,,,„.,. . ...„,,.,,,,,.,:..,...„,,,,,,..--•: .,.... ....„.... ..,-•••••• '.... r _ •ci:Orr".....2i -'.4v.-1---...P-;••?- .-, •::;•,. -....ei, ,y,•,•.- , -,,,-,- . ,, - , 4 t.4- , .4441 '. .,1,' .- .•.."`, ' . .1t(ki,, ,kir, • ./.,;1,;".'!.....:1;:■.-1•:•;i:,.::::::7*-''!:...*I'''''''7,.':::','•1"A.k.ti''' .-.T....i,, ., •4.,...., ..,• -.• •-c..?'• ...-•"....„..,,,,,•,, . .,.,..s.: .....,,. ._ ..--- .., , N • ..43.,,,,i,....,.;■,..„,.....,., '...",-.....:'.F!:7X,Ok"keti.'"'4: •• ',." .i'l''..cit-,:i4 q.,,,-.....-4•-•.:,-.,:••.f.••.•••.de.-4.,•-4, . ,,-4 i.- ••.:. •-3 .•' •..--4....- --. . , P*-',•••••••••.e.;:•:•:::-,'-`.:%::..,....;•::•':.::!..,:•:;...: ::,..4.4,1;,.i.•1,0-Ai .,,. '., ,.t••••,:•.t/-1-.1r,..2,4,:;:f•tfli''''':,:,;;;--,V.r.•:::•‘Ti':•-•-:::twi-,,,>)•• ..f:-. ."1 - ,..v..,:ii... . ' •••• , ..,.....• - • ,-;:ii.. '.. •:;:?':!.....'.1'.:"?;"gF•.';;;;:t.;;•:,-1,, ,P:.....-ki:,-;"?•'•%4'`•-... .'Ae.. .:.-0...,..,,,e.-.4, w, ,,..11,...,e47-,:.k..i .i-..-.4-,-.,-...-:. ..:,,,,. e7.p04 :. ,, , '..;,.,..,-'- f-.!t„'J,-,_:1,4v,64:1•‘::;,,„,•t:71:1- ..4iTile.,....i.s.v. ..,..on..*:).•.' :-:."Cl•ItrA'f*-4•.', .4-;.#,,c vti•-,1"til Lf,.....' •,-•,,,,,. , ..,-,•:s;-...,-,-..t. •••-,-• • - " .-•'..,- ' ' '''4t 'alt,,;..''*1..... • ' -too,•-• :,1*.' '.... rk:,,,,-....i:7'.•'..,'4.:i.4....71....q...-t7WiliSyrIV•5,,,,, -14..,st-7....ri,i'-v,:.•P,'L--,r,.,5---.11:-;... -7..'1-----....--i ' .,:ffr.,' ,.:-„1....,:4:77", ..t.,ef.1,4...,i.T '.1'!"'-'•':'..fr 71-v-, :f.ra: lot •E.1, . . , , , o ,0 11- 'fl N° 2- .-.4•••,....„ . ....„.:.,,,‘:,:„.„-, ,,,,.....,;,,,::,_,...„.„ V'h,'I .4.=?.ffix:-05Y nif,• I' ,i.',V..f.:••■'?•244.,i, 747.;1_, .11r- , •,.,-s,,loiV4•-:.-.A!Y .1 0. 7'•::-..'v."., .II t'.7 •• - i .,.:-., . ,,,,..■..,..,,...,,,,,p. .1.4...A.B. to.o§flni. N.+.•,%•:;,.,.A.r4;.•,.,.i...:1.,,At,.--.e. -4;7.714,......",.1;;#...i-tio,i. t.. •.- .4-4_. -• •... ; ,.., .•„;.,- 4.•:, r . 4e; . . .,..• •;•., -__. .. _.... ',.1."-stg:i•-13.ht.-'-4. .ist,:•',. V' !.".''..::-.1.1:*.:z.#.,:-. ttifcii.,..4:.‘1. .-.,..ti....::-,47 7.:ys..•:•:..... ,.90z.,. !. ,... , -...4..,...-rVW• .....!,.,:,••••.:; ,-..-, ,••••....-4,• • t... A..... 0,......-....„•••,.:-- ,.. •• '..;-,;'• .... .0.44. .:--i.•-vt:,, .±,,*.•TM;Z:,..e.'ti' •- .11-:*:rn'16,1:'`44ir.W:;"- -'* .:2Zfr1) ..'`.1..."''' /.'n.".4.f...i . '' 1 ,, -.„.4.7.,.;, ,,:, -.2itsig-j.' '',:',1-.. . 4.490 :. ..,-..' ,-..,-r- ,_, _,--,t?' -z.,ii5 ' .t......:,' ....,, •f,.`, ..'. ...'..;,:kiirt. ;-::: ;',.?„11ri,:ti 1.;.....:::',r.i. : .iy.-,-*,...' ',.:-.,-,,..1-..,.''et...I ..:.,..**7-i, ....-i---.,1P-;)-.51.51, ..e:',...;:7.:; ..:Ti.7 .-,. ,..;iii; i:,.4.;.....:.".`k-a7..t;!.. ".!::: -4-10 - "1,4,41r•'-v-- '-m..,•,!,',..,•••'..:•',.-','''^'■:,. 4, . ':i•,....."-•..',..." ••.:.f .J., -,-: %•.,:,- •','. : •-•-••-• ',..: --e. --,1!,..v,4:',:,"..),.'"'..--.. .:- ,,,,,,,,,,,..% , -..1,. ..,.. ;. . . , .:*..„. ..., • ,,.... _..- -.. ....:,,,....„.„..„ - „,, ... . ,i..k......:„..,...., • : . .„ 1.,... . •.•'i.2..iv,441 714,,,. ,. ,..„0... ,j,.,,,,, .., ‘,. ,.. ,,,......,,,.,,, ,..,,.. ....., , .... ...., ... ......‘,..0.m . ...c.t....„..„4„.• .."•...-.f;a•••••.". ■ .. ,• .. . ... 6,, .,.4!5 kr'. ...". . 1 r•-• i..4.4..,*!-..-;' .1'...4%-- if.• ,..4 I'" ;.•:4'40.'.;-f • • 4.*,:,,;i.... .--7•1"'-' 3.. • •••:.:.,:.,....... „..,,„ ., .,..-fr.,- .,. . 1. ,.- ',,....y.,....-..-:.: ,.? ...-1 n ('ity 01Tigatti 4•".4,0,',..,.... 34,,,,,.. ' rKTA"'''.......*•...P.r, .;.. tr,4•••••.un ,' ';,,,:'...;,.. •‘a.,;.,e. . • 4.:. .....,..., .../...p.,. ,44,,,gyi,,,,ia,t. • ,,tr.„4-keat•71. ..:-...i...,,.. . , 71.,..11........ ..,-„:„.„...„..,:s , ..., . ,..;....„•:.f.-•'- :,N•.:S•i',..:t.... .N.,. • ' . . -...77•.'k-* n1,1,- .-...,.F.,,,,.. ,. • -••: .../..i.,,,,r.-.--,. ••••`*".4•,•••••5.. i'.4.- ...,4,•••,t, .• •. •1.•;44. ' , 0 4..ri,A,"':. "0•...Ar••!,.•..t.4,• , .•:... ....., ...-..:.. . ..- ....., • I ..,,,,,i...1.•,-4(-: ,,..,,,., ......,%............-........,•.,.... .e...:...,...e. /..,,, ' ,,4,72...ilab, '''' '‘.. ./,'.I,•:-.:•-•;.••,, 0.1',',,,•-1,..••"».•N i -.P.-.-.e..'.,-.. •---...• . .• . .'r:...fi..---. • -.-...:- -,:::',...i....1-,;....-',... ''"''''''' " - " .' • , , ---,3•.'.v ei,i,..„,". ."• -',',...d..“,...,;•;":7,„E?".Tt.t.; ,-......, - ,'",:rx -1, 4 ."' •, ii...i..kg..;•kkv '4'1.45;;V/'.'.1. :,I:-r-It''..,,,j .'"?.,...' ,...,,.:.., ',J.'. ;‘.i A....';. '' ''-‘;',..-.:4'.;,',••••••z' .;.,..,..13_ ..,....„.:,,.....,„.,„,..,.„..,„..„.,,,.,... .......,. .. -•••• ....PZev . '•4;,'.11.:.:,.•-•-g4;•,.'•:,,;. . ''',41•;•..-i.'.-,./'N.„:•:., :,":;_,6-4 • „. -,....),,.^,:e. ,..;, .,i,,,..,,' ,ir .14,,,:',:.:,...-,:.■t:.. .,., .,,,,:.,:•!:,.;;.:-.:,; , V.,k , ....•„:;,'-- X .-no,..t• - c'ii ••••:. ..:-"V•.,.-L.(;,,'.•,--• T.s,-.-...-- 4k-t:'-fh•I'' :-.'-'•.. - r.,'':',71";•-•)`4-44- ,-,•4•:•-•‘'. .1•'• • - - -4.*I;',........ •••.,•' ■,,,,;;;.•1 ,.. A. "It Jr• • 7..e......:3i.,'4,"• . ,, , ...,..).;,......1,6A, ,1.42., ,/;,, ...1 4.•,";•?1":.4 or- , . , „.. -• . t:.r ..43",1 '7..cip:" .: ':4's.44.--- -.i•'`....:.••• :•:,. ..C.,,;''.1,•.i- ... • • . 0:.,4,16:1 '\ 33%.7".',.^1! .;,....z....y. ......,...,...7.r,s,A,..,•... •!., 1•41...... . ...." . ,...4,,, :• ,.,• ..kl. • 5.• .. WA:••••■•'• ,,,r,,,1 •,•..,--. ..,--.• ••,...•:••••,;•• :3::•••••.' • ....- ''•'. - , • -*.;,-14•"--.r, ..• •,-. •-,.*, ,;:.: .ar,-...4....7. -4-•;t . :•:.Ziv.;-..•./.4k ,_.- i,:o-..;:. 'x. ,..,,,g7,..,,,,../.,r4:.....,. ........A., ,:r...N..e.,,,,t,,• :-.. -..,,, „,;. ...... ..,.......1 T., , •..,..,.... . ',..• ..7• . . -,.....15 4..,;". Itr',.- ••;:..1k.i4"-'..1'..5.-.4;.'.'•'-4-74-...y.)4,, .;,•,:.:t .:rill i--,•• ..,-,...... - Community DeveloonVnt Sheet 9 Dirlitlied Aerial Photograph of Mititinticut S11.-: . . . • • • Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Type Size Quantity per Approx..Planting Total# (minimum) Template Area(sq. ft.) Plants Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia FACW nursery stock 5 to 6 feet tall I 31,700 317 Trees Oregon ash** Fraxinus latifolia clump of 3 every 50 feet 13 Piper's [Hooker]willow Salix piperi(hookeriana] FACW cutting 4 to 5 feet tall 3 7,000 210 **Total Oregon ash trees=330 • • red-osier dogwood .Cornus•stolonifera[sericea] FACW nursery 2 to 3 feet tall 2 3,300 66 Shrubs Pacific ninebark Physocarpus capitatus FACW- nursery kry 2 to 3 feet tall 1 3,300 33 clustered wild rose Rosa pisocarpa FAC nursery 2 to 3 feet tall 2 3,300 66 • • F: SI • LEGEND toff. Consultants in ecology and * • natural resource management Fanno Creek Trail - X X=number of plants within template DRAWN: S.Benjamin �, p p Mi igati loft. Fishman Environmental Services APPROVED: M.Walker o MAN 434 NW Sixth Avenue •Suite 304 DATE: . 11/16/98 PLANTING Sri.Portland,Oregon 97209-3600 Fi ure ll Sheet 8. Proposed Planting Specifications (503)224-0333 g + at 9 1• • • • PUBLIC NOTICE Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality 401 Certification Corps of Engineers Action ID Number:98-334 Notice Issued: December 21, 1998 Oregon Division of State Lands Number: RF-16167 Written Comments Due: January 20, 1999 • WHO IS THE APPLICANT: City of Tigard LOCATION OF CERTIFICATION ACTIVITY: See attached U.S. Army Corps of Engineers public notice WHAT IS PROPOSED: See attached U.S.Army Corps of Engineers public notice on the proposed project NEED FOR CERTIFICATION: Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act requires applicants for Federal permits or licenses to provide the Federal agency a water quality certification from the State of Oregon if the proposed activity may result in a discharge to surface waters. DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGES: See attached U.S.Army Corps of Engineers public notice on the proposed project • WHERE TO FIND DOCUMENTS: Documents and related material are available for examination and copying at Oregon Department of Environmental Quality,Water Quality Division, 811 S.W.6th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204 While not required,scheduling an appointment will ensure documents are readily accessible during your visit. To schedule an appointment please call Donna Kelly at.(503)229-6962. Any questions on the proposed certification may be addressed to the 401 Program Coordinator, (503)229-5845 or toll free within Oregon at 1-800-452-4011. People with hearing impairments may call DEQ's TTY at(503)229-6993. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Public hearing: DEQ will provide opportunity for a public hearing for interested people to appear and submit written or oral comments on the proposed permit if: • the submitted comments indicate significant public interest,or • written requests from 10 or more persons are received,or • an organization representing at least 10 persons requests a public hearing. Written comments: Written comments on the proposed certification must be received at the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality by 5 p.m. on (full date). Written comments should be mailed to Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Attn: 401 Program Coordinator, 811 S.W. 6th Avenue,Portland,Oregon 97204. People wishing to send written comments via e- mail should be aware that if there is a delay between servers or if a server is not functioning properly, e-mails may not be received prior to the close of the public comment period. People wishing to send comments via e-mail should send them in Microsoft Word (through version 7.0),WordPerfect(through version 6.x)or plain text format. Otherwise,due to conversion difficulties, DEQ recommends that comments be sent in hard copy. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT: DEQ will review and consider all comments received during the public comment period. Following this review, the permit may be issued as proposed, modified,or denied. You will be notified of DEQ's final decision if you present either oral or written comments during the comment period. Otherwise, if you wish to receive notification,please call or write DEQ at the above address. ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION: This publication is available in alternate format(e.g. large print,Braille) upon request. Please contact DEQ Public Affairs at(503)229-5766 or toll free within Oregon at 1-800-452-401 I to request an alternate format. People with a hearing impairment can receive help by calling DEQ's TTY at(503)229-6993. • • • FishmO Environmental Services 434 NW Sixth Avenue • Suite 304 Portland, OR 97209-3600 November 17, 1998 0 NMAN 503-224-0333 • Bill Parks, Washington County Resource Coordinator Oregon Division of State Lands 775 Summer Street NE Salem, OR 97310 • Jan Stuart, Regulatory Specialist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District P.O. Box 2946 • Portland, OR 97208-2946 SUBJECT: Fanno.Creek Trail Wetland Fill and Removal Permit Application for City of Tigard, Oregon T1S R1 W Section 34; T2S R1W Section 2 DSL Number ?; Corps ID Number 98-334 Dear Bill and Jan: At last,please find enclosed the wetland fill and removal permit application for the Fanno Creek Trail project that Duane Roberts, Planner for the City of Tigard, and Vannie Nguyen, Engineering Manager for the City of Tigard, have previously discussed with you. I have also included a conceptual mitigation plan and the Compensatory Mitigation Form. The project is scheduled for construction in early spring 1999, and as always, we very much appreciate your review of the enclosed materials and coordination of the permit application. Please let me know if additional materials are needed or if we need to respond to any comments. Thank you. Sincerely,. • C C. Mirth Walker, PWS Wetlands Program Manager c: Duane Roberts, City of Tigard PS: Bill, you may wish to check with Annette Lalka at the DSL, as she was reviewing the wetland delineation reports for this project. Hopefully this application will clarify any confusion over the wetland boundary mapping in the delineation reports. Thank you. G:\1998\98073\regJet FAX: (503)224-1851 (2D Printed on Recycled Paper PLEASE RECYCLE • • " Division of State Lands N DSL E Compensatory Mitigation Form S If the permit involves multiple compensatory mitigation projects at different locations then use a separate sheet for each location. Please be sure to complete Item#1 and the grand total acreages for impacts and mitigation, Items #2 and #3. Give breakdowns by Cowardin class only if known. 1. Crr'ioFTI&* n (Applicant) Permit No. (if known) MITIGATION SITE LOCATION FOR-El_ SC4400L Mitigation Site # Adjacent Waterway FAAwo C� County \ \/PrH._ Section � Township /6 Range. / VY Tax Lot(s) 1(.50 U.S.G.S. Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) No. i l09 oo 0 151 341 DD River Basin Name FA VlnoCr2P.e ¢» P,■Ye WETLAND IMPACTS 2. What wetland type or types will be filled or converted by your removal-fill project? (Not the compensatory mitigation project.) List all of the types. Where "wetland types" are requested on this form, the Division uses the Cowardini wetland classification codes found on National Wetland Inventory Maps. Below are the most common wetland types. If your wetland type is not listed, use one of the blank spaces and fill in the appropriate code. Also, indicate the acreage involved for each wetland type you list. Acreages should be listed to the 1/100 of an acre if possible. (F=Fill; R=Remove, C=Convert) Acres Acres Acres Acres F R C F R C F R C F R C ❑ PEM 030 0,30 -❑ R3RB ❑ E2EM 0 ❑ PSS _ ❑ R3UB 0 E2SS ❑ ❑ PFO ❑ R4SB ❑ E2FO - ❑ Grand Total of Wetland Impacts 030 Acres COMPENSATORY MITIGATION 3. List all of the wetland types (on the reverse side) that will result from your proposed compensatory mitigation project by mitigation kind and wetland type. Indicate the acreage involved for each wetland type you list. (continued on reverse side) 0 ::•. :: , _:::_..._ RESTORATION Acres Acres Acres Acres ❑ PEM ❑ R3RB ❑ E2EM ❑ ❑ PSS ❑ R3UB ❑ E2SS ❑ ❑ PFO ❑ R4SB ❑ E2FO ❑ Restoration Total 9 Acres .E CE ... Acres Acres Acres Acres ❑ PEM ❑ R3RB ❑ E2EM ❑ ❑ PSS ,D R3UB CI E2SS ❑ ID PFO O t g 1 CI- ❑ R4SB ❑ E2FO ❑ Enhancement Total 0,170 Acres ,... .r.^^n-... ,k v.�........ ........ .r.: ..-'` /%'mss:: - ,5.;.• :;, .. .REATION:� .: ����:'�� tip,:-;�,; .. . _.. . _ _-.._..._�_ ___ - Acres Acres Acres Acres ❑ PEM ❑ R3RB ❑ E2EM ❑ ❑ PSS ❑ R3UB ❑ E2SS ❑ . ❑ PFO ❑ R4SB ❑ E2FO ❑ I Creation Total pr Acres • Grand Total of Wetland Mitigation 0 ,1 D-1-. Acre 4. Is part art or all of the compensatory mitigation project site a prior converted cropland, a farmed wetland or a former wetland that is now upland? If known, state which type below: OKI ST,t'J M[T�Cet7 t°1\[5. If an upland buffer is proposed, please give average width and type: 5j- (S ADEQuAitLY Width (ft.) Acres FF{i Forested _ ' Scrub/Shrub Herbs/Grasses Buffer Total Acres P 6. Form completed by C L A /G 1 uJ C. M I O W a I ke - '1.1 " PI " (Signature) (Printed Name) (Date) 1 Cowardin,Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States, 1979. • Oregon Division of State Lands,Wetland Inventory User's Guide, 1990. Comitfim.doc JOINT 0FO I PERMIT APPLICATION FORM � '•'I THIS APPLICATION WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF BOTH AGENCIES J. t\, _q� O U S Army Corps xmn"t� of Engineers Portland District i e s AGENCIES WILL ASSIGN NUMBERS Corps Action ID Number (98-334) Oregon Division of State Lands Number SEND A SIGNED COPY OF YOUR APPLICATION TO BOTH AGENCIES District Engineer State of Oregon ATTN: CENPP-OP-GP Division of State Lands P 0 Box 2946 775 Summer Street NE Portland, OR 97208-2946 Salem, OR 97310 503/326-7730 503/378-3805 OO , Applicant Name City of Tigard business phone # (503) 639-4171 and Address Attn: Duane Roberts home phone # 13125 SW Hall Blvd FAX # (503) 684-7298 Tigard OR 97223 ❑ Co-Applicant Fishman Environmental Services business phone # (503) 224-0333 ® Authorized Agent Attn: Mirth Walker home phone # • ❑ Contractor 434 NW 6th Ave Ste 304 FAX # (503) 224-1851 Name and Address Portland OR 97209 Property Owner City of Tigard and Others - business phone # (if different than applicant) See Attached List home phone # Name and Address FAX # PROJECT LOCATION Street, Road or other descriptive location Legal Description Segment 2 Tigard St. to Tiedeman Ave.; Segment 3 Tiedeman to Woodard Park; Sement 4 Woodard Park to Quarter Section Township Range Grant Ave.; Segment 5 Grant Ave. to Main St.; Segment 6b SE 1/4 .34 T1S R1W Main St. South NE & NW 1/4 2 T2S R1W In or Near (City or Town) County Tax Map # Tax Lot # Tigard Washington See Attached List Waterway River Mile Latitude Longitude Wetlands associated with Fanno Creek, "4 miles N of North End: 45° 26' 13" .122° 46' 57" Tualatin River (Fanno Creek RM unknown) . South End: 45° 25' 34" 122° 46' 21" Is consent to enter property granted to the Corps and the Division of State Lands? ® Yes ❑ No 03 PROPOSED PROJECT INFORMATION Activity Type: 0 Fill 0 Excavation (removal) ❑ In-Water Structure ❑ Maintain/Repair an Existing Structure Brief Description: Construct Fanno Creek Trail Segments - multipurpose pedestrian - bicycle trail Fill will involve - cubic yards annually and/or - cubic yards for the total project 544 cubic yards in a wetland or below the ordinary high water or high tide line Fill will be ❑ Riprap ❑ Rock ❑ Gravel ❑ Sand ❑ Silt ❑ Clay ❑ Organics 0 Other Borrow material free of unsuitable materials Fill Impact Area is 0.30 Acres; - length; - width; 111,250 SF in Segment 2 and 1,995 SF in Segment 4) Removal will involve _ - cubic yards annually and/or 52 cubic yards for the total project (from wetlands) cubic yards below the ordinary high water or high tide line Removal will be ❑ Riprap ❑ Rock ❑ Gravel 0 Sand 0 Silt 0 Clay ❑ Organics ❑ Other Removal Impact Area is same as fill area (see attached Wetland Impact Area Calculations Summary Sheet) Is the Disposal area: Upland? 0 Yes ❑ No Waterway/Wetland? ❑ Yes ® No Are you aware of any Endangered Species on the project site? ❑ Yes 0 No If Yes, please explain in the project Are you aware of any Cultural Resources on the project site? ❑ Yes 0 No description (on page 2, block 4) Is the project site near a Wild and Scenic River? ❑ Yes 0 No • I PROPOSED PROJECT PURPOSE & DESCRIPTION Sheet 0. Wetland Impact Area Calculations Project Purpose and Need: Sheet Index: Summary (Fill / Removal Calculations) Sheet 1. Trail Location Map See Attached Information. Sheet 2. Segment 2 Trail Location and Wetland Impact and Bridge Over Summer Creek Sheet 3. Segment 3 Trail Location Sheet 4. Segment 4 Trail Location and Wetland Impact and Bridge Project Description: Over Fanno Creek See Attached Information. Sheet 5. Segment 5 Trail Location Sheet 6. Segment 6b Trail Location and Bridge Over Fanno Creek Sheet 7. Existing Conditions and Proposed Enhancement Mitigation Sheet 8. Proposed Planting Specifications How many project drawing sheets are included with this application? Sheet 9. Digitized Aerial Photograph of Mitigation Site NOTE: A complete application must include drawings and a location map suomitteo on separate is Yz A 11 sheets. Will any material, construction debris, runoff, etc. enter a wetland or waterway? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe the type of discharge (above) and show the discharge location on the site plan. Estimated start date: early 1999 Estimated Completion Date: within 6 months of start date © PROJECT IMPACTS AND ALTERNATIVES Describe alternative sites and project designs that were considered to avoid impacts to the waterway or wetland. See Attached Information. Describe what measures you will use (before and after construction) to minimize impacts to the waterway or wetland. See Attached Information. • NOTE: If necessary, use additional sheets. © MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION Adjoining Property Owners and Their Addresses and Phone Numbers See Attached Information. Has the proposed activity or any related activity received the attention of the Corps of Engineers or the State of Oregon in the past, e.g. wetland delineation, violation, permit, lease request, etc.? ® Yes 0 No Wetland Delineation Reports (2) submitted March 31, 1998 and June 2, 1998 If yes, what identification number(s) were assigned by the respective agencies: Corps # 98-334 State of Oregon # CITY/COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT (to be completed by local planning official) ❑ This project is not regulated by the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. ❑ This project has been reviewed and is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. ❑ This project has been reviewed and is not consistent with the local comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. ❑ Consistency of this project with the local planning ordinance cannot be determined until the following local approval(s) are obtained: ❑ Conditional Use Approval ❑ Development Permit Plan Amendment ❑ Zone Change ❑ Other An a • 'on Chas ❑ has •o been made for local approvals checked above. �pp TIGARD !/ !4 _ J Signature (of local planning offi.;14 Titl ✓ City /County Date COASTAL ZONE CERTIFICATION If the proposed activity described in your permit application is within the Oregon coastal zone, the following certification is required before your application can be processed. A public notice will be issued with the certification statement which will be forwarded to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development for its concurrence or objection. For additional information on the Oregon Coastal Zone Management Program, contact the department at 1175 Court Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97310 or call 503/373-0050. CERTIFICATION STATEMENT I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the proposed activity described in this application complies with the approved Oregon Coastal Zone Management Program and will be completed in a manner consistent with the program. NOT APPLICABLE Print/Type Name Title Applicant Signature Date • C) SIGNATURE FOR JOINT APPLICATION (REQUIRED) Application is hereby made for the activities described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this information is true, complete, and accurate. I further certify that possess the authority including the necessary requisite property interests to undertake the proposed activities. I understand that the granting of other permits by local, county, state or federal agencies does not release me from the requirement of obtaining the permits requested before commencing the project. I understand that local permits may be required before the state removal-fill permit is issued. I understand that payment of the required state processing fee does not guarantee permit issuance. DUANE ROBERTS PLANNER Print/Type Name Title // / 7/2 S Applicant Signature Date I certify that I may act as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. - MIRTH WALKER WETLANDS PROGRAM MANAGER Print/Type Name Title 54 444 t ,EAy, Sr/Cs (� if//b/98 Agent Signature Date • SUPPLEMENTAL WETLAND IMPACT INFORMATION* (FOR WETLAND FILLS ONLY) • Site Conditions of impact area Impact area is ❑ Ocean ❑ Estuary ❑ River ❑ Lake ❑ Stream ® Freshwater Wetland (associated with Fanno Creek) Note: Estuarian Resource Replacement Is required by state law for projects involving Intertidal or tidal marsh alterations. A separate Wetlands Resource Compensation Plan may be appended to the application. Has a wetland delineation been completed for this site? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, by whom: Mirth Walker and Stacy Benjamin, Fishman Environmental•Services, 1998 (two reports): Wetland Delineation Fanno Creek Trail. T1S, R1 W, SE 1/4 Section 34 & T2S, R1 W, NE& NW 1/4 Section 2, Washington County, Tigard, Oregon. Prepared for Duane Roberts, Planner, City of Tigard. March 31, 1998. FES Project 97126. Wetland Delineation Supplement, Fanno Creek Trail: Woodard Park Site, T2S R1 W NW 1/4 Section 2, Washington County, Tigard, Oregon. Prepared for Duane Roberts, Planner, City of Tigard. May 27, 1998. FES Project 97126. Describe the existing Physical and biological character of the wetland/waterway site by area and type of resource (use separate sheets and photos, if necessary) See Attached Information. Resource Replacement Mitigation Describe measures to be taken to replace unavoidable impacted wetland resources See Attached Information. • • * Because this information is not necessary for a complete application, you may submit this sheet and other environmental information after submitting you application. • I ATTACHED TEXT BY SECTION - FANNO CREEK TRAIL November 16, 1998 JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION @ and ® PROPERTY OWNERS OF TRAIL ALIGNMENT BY TAX LOT Tax lots listed in geographical order beginning with the most northerly property. 1S1 34DD 100 • Tigard-Tualatin School District District #23-J 13137 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, OR 97223 2S1 3AA 101 Tigard-Tualatin School District 2S1 2BB 600 Metro Regional Parks and Greenspaces 600 NE Grand Ave. Portland, OR 97232-2736 2S1 2BB 832 City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97009 2S1 2BA 300 Wilshire Real Estate Partnership 1776 SW Madison St., #300 Portland, OR 97205 2S1 2BA 2000 Ronald and Gayle Wicks 12345 SW Grant Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 2S1 2BA 1501 City of Tigard 2S1 2BA 1400 Robert Ball 2255 NW Johnson Ste #1 Portland, OR 97210 2S1 2AC 700 Dolan & Co. LLC (not in adjoining property owner list) By Florence T. Dolan 4025 SE Brooklyn Portland, OR 97202 2S1 2AC 200 Page Stevens (not in adjoining property owner list) 9180 SW Burnham Rd. Tigard, OR 97223 • FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 1 November 16, 1998 • • 2S1 2AC 1101 Dave & Christine Hammon (not in adjoining property 3015 SW 116th Ave owner list) Beaverton, OR 97005 • 2S1 2AC 1100 Otto Sorg (not in adjoining property By First .Interstate Bank owner list) Trust Real Estate T-12 PO Box 2971 Portland, OR 97208 2S1 2AC 204 City of Tigard 2S1 2DB 500 City of Tigard Project Purpose and Need: The project is. the construction of five segments of a pedestrian/bike trail to connect to the existing trail sections along Fanno Creek. The trail is a goal of the City of Tigard as outlined in the City's adopted Tigard Park Master Plan, which calls for a Fanno Creek recreational trail running the length of the Creek within the city, extending from Tigard's northern city limits downstream to the confluence with the Tualatin River. Thus far, about twenty per cent of the Fanno Creek trail system, consisting of six discontinuous sections, has been completed. The present project proposes the construction of five additional Fanno Creek trail segments. Recent City surveys indicate a high demand for recreational trails, and the existing sections of the trail receive extensive use by citizens. The Fanno Creek trail is a part of the four-county, Forty-Mile Loop regional trail system originally proposed in 1903. Project Description: The proposed five trail segments consist of a 10 foot wide paved pathway (shoulder is additional). The five segments are, from north to south: Segment 2: Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue (Fowler School Site) Wetland Impact Area: 11 ,250 SF (750 linear feet); 52 CY excavation; 427 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Summer Creek Segment 3: Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park (Woodard Park Site) Segment 4: Woodard Park to Grant Avenue Wetland Impact Area: 1 ,995 SF (133 linear feet); 0.17 CY excavation; 117 CY fill; Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Segment 5: Grant Avenue to Main Street Segment 6b: Main Street South Segment contains bridge over Fanno Creek Total Wetland Impact Area: 13,245 SF (0.30 acre) or 833 linear feet of trail; 52.17 CY removal and 544 CY fill FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 2 November 16, 1998 • Three bridges are part of the project, and will span Fanno Creek (twice) and Summer Creek from top-of-bank to top-of-bank. For reference, Segment 1 is already under construction and goes from N. Dakota Street to Tigard Street. OO PROJECT IMPACTS AND ALTERNATIVES Describe alternative sites and project designs that were considered to avoid impacts to the waterway or wetland. Alternative sites are limited due to the intended location of the trail adjacent to Fanno Creek, the location of the existing.trail system, and the City's ownership and easement procurement. Segment 2, Tigard Street to Tiedeman Avenue, has unavoidable wetlands present. Beginning at Tigard Street, the trail is routed outside the wetland boundary and crosses the unavoidable portion of the wetland near its narrowest section. The trail then skirts the edge of the wetland and the edge of the playing field and associated equipment (fitness course signs, workout equipment stations, and ballfield backstop) and impacts only a narrow fringe of mowed and disturbed wetland. All Oregon ash trees on the north side of Fanno and Summer Creeks are avoided, and only emergent wetland is impacted. The bridge crosses Summer Creek where no adjacent wetlands are present, and then joins with Tiedeman Avenue to connect with Segment 3. Segment 3, Tiedeman Avenue to Woodard Park: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands in the park as well as the ODOT mitigation area north of the park for the Highway 217/Kruse Way Interchange project. Segment 4, Woodard Park to Grant Avenue: The trail skirts above the wetland boundary where possible, impacting a narrow fringe of emergent wetland on the north side of Fanno Creek. Two Oregon ash trees on the north bank of Fanno Creek have to be removed for the bridge (please note that the tree survey incorrectly identified trees). The trail is aligned in an upland area on the south side of Fanno Creek and then crosses a narrow neck of unavoidable emergent wetland, avoiding forested wetland areas. Trail alignment is constrained through this segment due to steep' upland slopes on the north side of Fanno Creek; the trail has to cross a back-water emergent area on the south side of Fanno Creek to connect with the paved ramp up to Grant Avenue. Impacts to the backwater wetland area are avoided by constructing a boardwalk bridge across the wetland area, with piers in the upland (top-of-bank to top-of-bank). Segment 5, Grant Avenue to Main Street avoids wetlands. The trail alignment has been routed outside of the wetland area; it connects with an existing concrete walk located north of Pacific Highway and north of Main Street. FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 3 November 16, 1998 • Segment 6b, Main Street South: The alignment was changed to avoid wetlands, and a large section of the proposed trail on the east side of Fanno Creek was scrapped due to the extensive amount of wetlands present. A part of the trail in this section is a boardwalk, to raise the trail up and avoid excessive fill (in uplands) near the top-of- bank of Fanno Creek. In this segment, the location of the bridge crossing Fanno Creek was constrained by the City's easements on the adjoining properties (and by construction of a new building south of Main Street on the east side of Fanno Creek). The trail continues in upland on the west side of Fanno Creek to connect with the existing paved pathway. A southern portion of this trail segment connects to the Ash Street right-of-way, avoiding wetlands on both sides of the trail. Describe what measures you will use (before and after construction) to minimize impacts to the waterway or wetland. Standard best management erosion control practices (such as silt fences and biofilter bags, as outlined in the Unified Sewerage Agency Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans, Technical Guidance Handbook) will be specified in the construction documents prepared by the City of Tigard. • FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 4 November 16, 1998 • • © MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION Adjoining Property Owners and Their Addresses (no phone numbers) 2S102BA-02200 f 2S102BA-02300 DONALD M STROUM BRENDAN ENRIGHT 9975 SW JOHNSON ST 21028 HWY 99E NE TIGARD OR 97223 AURORA OR 97002 • V 2S102BB-00600 ✓ 2S102BB-00700 METRO MARY JANE LAWTON 600 NE GRAND AVE 10355 SW WALNUT PORTLAND OR 97232 TIGARD OR 97223 2S102BB-00827 ✓ 2S102BB-00828 DALE & CAROL KAMMEYER PAULINE WEAVER (TRUSTEE) 10495 SW JOHNSON CT 7865 SW BONITA RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 /2S102BB-00829 ,J2S102BB-00830 HOLLY J WINICK DOUGLAS OPPEDAL 10470 SW JOHNSON CT 10440 SW JOHNSON CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 /2S102BB-00831 V 2S102BB-01000 IVAN & RAMONA JONES CHRISTINE COCHRAN 6450 SW FISHER 10085 SW JOHNSON ST BEAVERTON OR 97005 TIGARD OR 97223 ✓ 2S102BB-00900 ✓ 1 S134DD-01000 CHARLES & DEBRA SMITH TIG.-TUAL. SCHOOL DISTRICT #23-J 10065 SW JOHNSON ST 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD. OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S103AA-00100 ✓ 1 S134DD-01200 DONALD & ELIZABETH SWAN DANIEL DILSAVER 12060 SW TIEDEMAN 11675 SW TIEDEMAN TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S102BA-02000 1 S134DD-01400 RONALD GAYLE WICKS KEVIN DRESSEL 12345 SW GRANT AVE 13459 SW 136TH PL TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 5 November 16, 1998 • • • 1 S134DD-01600 V 1 S134DD-01800 STEVEN & ALICE POPE MARCEL J CHAPUT 2120 NW 135TH 11935 SW TIEDEMAN AVE PORTLAND OR 97229 TIGARD OR 97223 J2S 102AB-01.801 JOAN K RISBERG (TRUSTEE) ✓2S102AB-01802 4210 IMPERIAL DR CITY OF TIGARD WEST LINN OR 97068 13125 SW HALL TIGARD OR 97223 2S102AB-01900 c�28102BA-00300 DOUGLAS R ALLRED WILSHIRE REAL ESTATE PARTNERS. 5820 SW CHESTNUT 1776 SW MADISON ST, SUITE 300 BEAVERTON OR 97005 PORTLAND OR 97205 ✓ 2S102BA-01000 /2S102BAOO5O1 GARRY & RICHARD HELMER DAROLD & SUE SNYDER 10585 SW WALNUT AVE 12937 WATER GAP RD TIGARD OR 97223 WILLIAMS OR 97544 ✓ 2S102BA-01200 / 2S1028A-01 190 MORLAN PROPERTIES ALVIN S ELKINS 5529 SE FOSTER RD 1730 SW SKYLINE BLVD # 107 PORTLAND OR 97206 PORTLAND OR 97221 2S102BA-01400 TIGARD RESIDENT ROBERT D BALL 12300 SW GRANT 2255 NW JOHNSON STE 1 TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97210 1 S134DD-01 100 TIGARD RESIDENT GERALD L ANDERSON 10865 SW WALNUT 11645 SW TIEDEMAN RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 / 1S134DD-01300 TIGARD RESIDENT ANA & RONALD BOYCE 9438 SW TIGARD ST PO BOX 23093 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223. 1 S 134DD-01500 WOLTER VAN DOORNINCK � TIGARD RESIDENT 10155 SW JOHNSON 6555 SW DALE AVE TIGARD OR 97223 BEAVERTON OR 97005 FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION November 16, 1998 Page 6 • . • TIGARD RESIDENT /2S102BB-00900 �vt/P 11825 SW TIEDEMAN TIGARD RESIDENT . TIGARD OR 97223 10065 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD RESIDENT i/ 2S103AA-00100 ,,,,P` 9828 SW TIGARD ST TIGARD RESIDENT TIGARD OR 97223 12060 SW TIEDEMAN AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD RESIDENT ✓2S102BA-02000 9685 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD RESIDENT TIGARD OR 97223 12345 SW GRANT AVE TIGARD OR 97223 • TIGARD RESIDENT /2S102BA-02300 ` 9440 SW TIGARD TIGARD RESIDENT • TIGARD OR 97223 10005 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD OR .97223 ✓ 2S102BA-02200 964, /2S102BB-00700 To. TIGARD RESIDENT TIGARD RESIDENT 9975 SW JOHNSON ST 10355 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 ✓�S1-0268_0.0.60 2S102BB-00828 TIGARD RESIDENT �ii' TIGARD RESIDENT 10270 SW KATHERINE ST 10500 SW JOHNSON CT TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 ✓ 2S102BB-00827 V 2S102BB-00830 1 '' TIGARD RESIDENT TIGARD RESIDENT 10495 SW JOHNSON CT 10440 SW JOHNSON CT TIGARD OR 97223 . TIGARD OR 97223 ✓ 2S102BB-00829 ) ' -/2S102BB-01000 , TIGARD RESIDENT TIGARD RESIDENT V 10470 SW JOHNSON CT 10085 SW JOHNSON ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 V 2S102BB-00831 �� /1 S134DD-01200 TIGARD RESIDENT T TIGARD RESIDENT 10410 SW JOHNSON CT 11675 SW TIEDEMAN AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 7 November 16, 1998 %° 011441i- 115 may 400 IGARD RESIDEN T YS' 11755 SW TIEDEMAN AVE TIGARD OR 97223 /2S1O2BA-01000 pf ' TIGARD RESIDENT, 9540 SW TIGARD ST - TIGARD OR 97223 V2S102BA-01200 1 . TIGARD RESIDENT 12585 SW PACIFIC TIGARD OR 97223r-el) ✓1 S134DD-01 100 p"'? , TIGARD RESIDENT (P5 11645 SW TIEDEMAN AVE TIGARD OR 97223 11S134DD-01300 -Pt"? ' rov,- TIGARD RESIDENT (P5' 11735 SW TIEDEMAN AVE TIGARD OR 97223 ✓1 S134DD-01500 D s-o TIGARD RESIDENT. C v 11 175 SW TIEDEMAN AVE TIGARD OR 97223 34P)� 1 S134DD-01800 T � ' TIGARD RESIDENT GPI 11935 SW TIEDEMAN AVE TIGARD OR 97223 /2Slo2ABol8o2 TIGARD RESIDENTf 9460 SW TIGARD ST TIGARD OR 97223 12S102BA-00501 TIGARD RESIDENT 9740 SW TIGARD ST TIGARD OR 97223 FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 8 November 16, 1998 • • • SUPPLEMENTAL WETLAND IMPACT INFORMATION* (FOR WETLAND FILLS ONLY) Describe the existing Physical and biological character of the wetland/waterway site by area and type of resource (use separate sheets and photos, if necessary) The wetlands along the trail alignment have been delineated and described in the two wetland delineation reports prepared by FES in the spring of 1998. The two impact areas are described in this section. The northernmost impact area is in Segment 2, on the Fowler School site owned by the Tigard-Tualatin School District. The trail skirts a broad flood plain of Fanno Creek dominated by reed canarygrass and meadow foxtail, and crosses a narrow neck of the wetland that extends away from the floodplain area (this wetland neck extends upslope to the west, offsite to a wetland seep area). The trail then impacts a narrow grassy fringe of emergent wetland east of the school ball field and west of an Oregon ash wetland forest which is immediately adjacent to Fanno Creek. Part of this wetland area is regularly mowed as lawn associated with the ball field. Soils in the floodplain area were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silty clay loam, with no redox concentrations to 6 inches, over a very dark gray (10YR 3/1 ) stiff clay, with brown (10YR 5/3) redox concentrations to a depth of 16 inches. Soils in an upslope position near the crossing of the wetland neck were a very dark gray (10YR 3/1 ) silty clay loam to 16 inches, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations, and gray (10YR 5/1 ) depletions at 14 inches. The floodplain receives highwater over-bank • flows from Fanno Creek and has a high groundwater table. The other segment with wetland impacts is Segment 4, north of Grant Avenue. The trails passes through an emergent meadow associated with the floodplain of Fanno Creek. The meadow area is dominated by bentgrass and reed canarygrass, and has soils that were a very dark grayish brown and dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2 and 4/2) sandy silt loam, with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations and dark gray (5Y 4/1 ) depletions in the surface 10 inches. The soils had a compacted hardpan at 10 inches, possibly disturbed from previous sewer line construction. The second wetland crossing in this segment occurs on the opposite (south) side of Fanno Creek, where the trail crosses a narrow finger of sparsely-vegetated, disturbed wetland dominated by climbing nightshade and red-osier dogwood, with Himalayan blackberry on the slopes. The trail avoids the surrounding Oregon ash and red alder trees near the trail. Water quality in this backwater area appears to have been negatively impacted by trash and debris. • • FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 9 November 16, 1998 • • Resource Replacement Mitigation Describe measures to be taken to replace unavoidable impacted wetland resources The proposed conceptual mitigation plan calls for the mitigation of the 0.30 acre wetland impact by enhancing 0.90 acre of non-forested, reed canarygrass- and meadow foxtail-dominated wetland, located in the floodplain area east and south of an Oregon ash wetland forest adjacent to Fanno Creek, on the Fowler School site in Segment 2. This provides a 3:1 enhancement ratio and mitigates adjacent to the largest wetland impact incurred by the trail system. The existing wetland forest area is dominated by Oregon ash and reed canarygrass, with scattered clumps of Piper's willow, clustered wild rose, and Douglas' spirea. The wetland will be enhanced by planting large Oregon ash saplings and Piper's willow cuttings, to extend the forested wetland area into the meadow area, and appropriate shrubs (clustered wild rose, red-osier dogwood, and Pacific ninebark) will be planted adjacent to the existing forest near the trail to provide additional wildlife habitat. The trail will still remain open and not obscured by the plantings (for security reasons). The attached drawings explain the proposed trail alignment and wetland mitigation plan. • FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 10 November 16, 1998 • • MITIGATION PLAN - FANNO CREEK TRAIL - FOWLER SCHOOL SITE IMPACT AREA: 0.30 Acre Emergent Wetland MITIGATION AREA: 0.90 Acre Enhancement Wetland MITIGATION LOCATION: Fowler School, Segment 2, between the trail and Fanno Creek, outside the existing wetland forest EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS (ADDITIONAL SITE VISIT 9/9/98) Vegetation The existing wetland forest area is dominated by Oregon ash and reed canarygrass, with scattered clumps of Piper's willow, clustered wild rose, and Douglas' spirea. Patches of orange balsam, slough sedge and smooth scouring-rush are present.•The following species are present in trace amounts: Pacific ninebark, red-osier dogwood, ornamental hawthorn, leafy beggars-tick, rice cutgrass, and climbing nightshade. A table of the vegetation noted on-site in the mitigation area is shown below. • Reed canarygrass dominates the majority of the wetland meadow east and south of the forest. Meadow foxtail dominates a portion of the meadow, especially near the trail crossing area (it appears to compete well with reed canarygrass). Several isolated Oregon ash trees are present in the meadow, as well as patches of clustered wild rose and spirea. A few small clumps of small-fruited bulrush and slough sedge are present, as well as quite a bit of wooly sedge and birdsfoot-trefoil. It should be noted that the reed canarygrass in the forest is approximately 3 feet tall and spindly, whereas the reed canarygrass in the meadow is taller and more robust, and has a thicker mat of root-thatch; an enhancement goal is to shade the reed canarygrass to lessen its vitality and provide greater vegetational and structural diversity. VEGETATION OF THE FOWLER SCHOOL WETLAND FOREST AND MEADOW Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Status meadow foxtail Alopecurus pratensis FACW leafy beggars-tick Bidens frondosa FACW+ wooly sedge Carex lanuginosa OBL slough sedge Carex obnupta OBL red-osier dogwood Corpus stolonifera FACW ornamental hawthorn Crataegus monogyna FACU + smooth scouring-rush Equisetum laevigatum FACW. Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia FACW FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 11 November 16, 1998 s • VEGETATION OF THE FOWLER SCHOOL WETLAND FOREST AND MEADOW Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Status orange balsam Impatiens capensis FACW rice cutgrass Leersia oryzoides OBL birdsfoot-trefoil Lotus corniculatus ' FAC reed canarygrass Phalaris arundinacea FACW Pacific ninebark Physocarpus capitatus FACW- Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU clustered wild rose Rosa pisocarpa FAC Piper's [Hooker] willow Salix piperi [hookeriana] FACW [FACW-] small-fruited bulrush Scirpus microcarpus OBL Douglas' spirea Spiraea douglasii FACW climbing nightshade Solanum dulcamara FAC+ Soils Soils in the floodplain and forest area are mapped as the hydric Cove silty clay loam, which are poorly drained soils that formed in recent clayey alluvium on floodplains. On-site soils in the drier portions of the wetland were a very dark gray (10YR 3/1 ) stiff clay to silty clay loam, with brown (10YR 5/3) and dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations (mottles), and gray (10YR 5/1 ) depletions (mottles). The very dark gray chroma matches the surface horizon of the Cove soil; it is likely that soils sampled in the wetter portions of the floodplain would exhibit the darker matrix colors typical of the subsoil of Cove soils (very dark gray (N 4/0) clay), with dark yellowish brown and dark reddish brown mottles. The on-site soils are mapped accurately. Hydrology The floodplain receives highwater over-bank flows from Fanno Creek and has a high 0 groundwater table. The existing ground in the floodplain area is very hummocky, and many anthills are present (the latter is an anecdotal indicator of wetland hydrology). The Cove soil series typically experiences common, brief duration flooding during the months of December to April (Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon, USDA SCS, 1982). During these same months, the soil survey lists this soil as having a perched high water table within 0 to 12 inches of the surface. FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 12 November 16, 1998 • Reference Site The existing Oregon ash forest provides an ideal reference wetland for the proposed mitigation. Appropriate species from the reference site have been chosen for use in the mitigation plan. Wetland soils and wetland hydrology are already present. Enhancing the wetland meadow by providing vegetational diversity is achievable. PROPOSED ENHANCEMENT PLANTS The following plants have been chosen for use in this mitigation plan, based on their natural occurrence in the on-site reference wetland and desirability for wildlife habitat and aesthetics: COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME WETLAND TREES Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia Piper's [Hooker] willow Salix piperi [hookeriana] WETLAND SHRUBS red-osier dogwood Corpus stolonifera [sericea] Pacific ninebark. Physocarpus capitatus clustered wild rose Rosa pisocarpa • The attached drawings show existing conditions and the enhancement area. The size and spacing of the plants in the enhancement area are shown on the attached planting plan. The mitigation goal is, simply, to enhance existing reed canarygrass- dominated wetland by creating a natural looking Oregon ash forest with a willow. forest around its perimeter, and increasing the wildlife value along the existing forest perimeter with enhanced shrub plantings. PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS The mitigation enhancement area will be flagged in the field prior to mitigation construction. Trees and shrubs are to be balled and burlapped or in containers. Bare root plants are allowed if nursery-grown proof is available. All plants will be flagged for identification, to enable monitoring of plant survival rate. Soil compaction form power machinery and damage to existing forest vegetation must be kept to a minimum. Substitution of plant species must be approved by the City's representative (Fishman Environmental Services). Oregon Ash Forest 1 . Installation needs to occur in September/October of the construction year. Soil should be moist. FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 13 November 16, 1998 • • • 2. Randomly select planting locations within the transect. 3. Remove reed canarygrass top growth and root thatch within a 3-foot diameter circle around the planting location center point. 4. Dig a hole twice the diameter of the root ball and place the soil to the side. Place the plant in the hole so the top of the root mass is even with the adjacent ground level. Hold the plant in place and place loose topsoil around the roots. Lightly tamp the soil around the roots to remove large air pockets. 5. If the soil is not saturated during planting, then each individual plant will be watered at the.time of planting (approximately 1 gallon of water per.plant). • 6. Upon completion of installation, place a mulch (chipped woody material) around the plant stem in a 3-foot radius, 3 inches deep. Willow Forest 7. Select live cutting of willow from the surrounding area. 8. The cuttings will be taken during the winter months and planted within 2 days of collection. 9. The cuttings will be 4 to 5 feet in length and consist of one and two year old growth. 10. The cut ends must remain moist until planted, and leaves (if present) carefully removed to avoid bark injury. 11 . At the planting location, open the soil to a 1-foot depth with a spade or shovel. Insert the cutting into the soil wedge and push deeper another 4 to 6 inches to ensure complete soil contact. Tamp soil around cutting. Shrub Enhancement Area Planting specifications are the same as for the Oregon Ash Forest (numbers 1-6). MONITORING After the first year after planting, all plant specimens will be counted and vigor will be assessed. An annual monitoring report will be prepared for 3 or 5 years as determined by DSL to document the survival of enhancement plants. Phototransects will be permanently marked. The site will be monitored in accordance with DSL and Corps guidelines. SUCCESS CRITERIA The enhancement will be considered successful if 80 percent of the planted trees and shrubs (by each individual species) survive. Additional saplings and shrubs will be planted as necessary as the project progresses to meet the 80 percent survival target. FANNO CREEK TRAIL JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION - ATTACHED INFORMATION Page 14 November 16, 1998 G:\1998\98073\attach text.wpd • • . FANMO Cg y 1 t� Wetland Impact Area Calculations Summary Existing Ground cal = Surface Area (not including shoulder) m = Surface Area (including shoulder) Finish Grade _i_____ B = Softdesk Calculated Volumes . ANN 0.9167' 0 = Path Structure Section \ �. 12.5 imj AVG Segment 2: Stal3+50 to 16+50 (300') Sta 17+75 to 22+25 (450') Totals Al = 3000 SF Al =4500 SF Al = 7500 SF A2 =4500 SF A2 =6750 SF A2= 11250 SF Bcut= 31 CY Bcut=21 CY Bcut= 52 CY Bfill = 64 CY Bfill =45 CY Bfill = 109 CY C= 127CY C= 191CY C =318CY Segment 3: No Impact . Segment 4: Sta 14+25 to 14+33 (8') Sta 14+75 to 15+50 (75') Sta 16+75 to 17+25 (50') Al = 80 SF Al =750 SF Al = 500 SF A2= 120 SF A2 = 1125 SF A2 = 750 SF Bcut=0.03 CY Bcut= 0.14 CY Bcut= 0 CY Bfill = 0.88 CY Bfill = 18 CY . Bfill=42 CY C= 3CY C = 32CY C = 21 CY . Sta 19+50 to 19+75 Totals Bridge Construction Al = 1330 SF . • (Temporary Impact) A2= 1995 SF Bcut= 0.17 CY Bfill = 61 CY C='56 CY Segment 5: No Impact Segment 6B: No Impact Ta !�� �. — A2- = 13,2-4-15 6p ( 69 ' 3 ° P'-cg€ T rl C Y Fanno Creek Trail Permit 11 = BO l t ru = ► 1 C Sheet p of q 11/98 —10T P0.--- FGMO AN L_ 13 Lc,tt = 5Z, I7 655 25 "� ■GTtt•R�•t'�r.,..+.�y '!��J�� ���1sldF 4�r'°"•'����,/ti[ffiZIt'S<'a • _���ik.—i i7L��Awnwml�6© ��•=_.M!l g. gy,.y�q 1• 'ttar i 1 1� i Lr l •a�x:141.„.,... q Sy Ks, �•��C",N 1 I115N1NfiIG'(2- 5 y Y y rsw r >,�j.i• r ri l�J'L ��5 1 r'r :d. � 50UAREA1•� .SW.: .ARCRE I'a�' 25 ifir...w.A 10':.... ifAf` �=� _ sF mad x < ` sr yy '�vr` � lr , ' •P/S CENTER 7+q. g1 a !` ♦ w• S NWII ST - . ,e G e ,110 el w` > „1 ri 1 © © ■nwa G �&< 9i�it/ 0600 .zo. STi •]�!SW t,,6.;:?II WWII a sr t av .a N A � E�'.N) < _ . .! " ,, ■ Ill , �' .1 .. .,fie '4“ , ' .. 28 '1r, .I l,'• ,, 27... _ 3'r�'''''t .O. ' 1 S' aS[Alt.D,kprg'. r ;` f' LFREO S ; r x1 Sy /• rig., A_ 7 RR •�`• "' s //1 iG Leo/• <SWAP BORDERS• B((r �ELMi00D_'Cli a�.;t,`A'`�. 5' `iF •clw Sv" s j' r 5]00./ r . q Si m r : 'K. ■6 `*+7' .. �,r 2 9100> eeoo noo k :•:,M" aA• 01 n i�irGYB as ? uo,w- n.F i �i i�t`F• m rr` 7 RFSC'',f). Y a LENt41N` sT i, La sT , P?%,��W`p a.et6 (,.,„ ,�, *�, °�• APy.• ..,_ d .4 14 c A r 0' W 1qi•,,l 6/ �,{P • dP. > 1. "r d F'trf. I .Y i�r•�1 �)/i • DR �4 yy .r. 11 �� . ® r(uI I" f ©- !t 'ta,I.. 1">,N�N < < ",k ♦,.' 14..�.4d♦', {:•�u: „,`•t i 1 •o. a Yk['� �OGA ®�t .�4 IC 5414. uRtx k y J!±�i !,,rE�, ,NES7R7� �L� 4cyA.. r iNtoQ�, qg� CORRAL T ,�� �,r _:5� .YENT ` r�S.:-Y! S° < 3O ' W PM ��y�� _ i x.51 �4L'ii'1 �� E" UNOAU ST s•. , v uro r if • � `4•t :Tt ..6at1P111T.1� .� ,r N YIP Sr w,r t{- 7r a4, A r � , MID ��. •".ER• n ',) ;.:may h v97 .0 IE$:.^a. ��c�!��®^',t'2rN.',�lat I< _ N / 1`4Ra ••..4`! '':,: BEND• .,,v`„,.e v.4•ti-z du, - r �'n p` •, :t•r $ .,•S, I.ST..- _ 7,.... c e' `■/t�r-. j��r I� I• �l 5” Ifir \ r .,. Q•.' T�11. ELEAF - '-STAE :•'?•" l e �•il�x A/ F•_ II-,�r.t•+-'•" !''iR•IN.:�I� 21D >. �� k.Plr F".t k• -te i :+ 217,•r',y• Y'" !t, .�I MAPLE ?a...•... w RBI � fl, S HO �: I _ ,:.•a t W.. °'�� �� ©�I � DAR. • [�G,i . ,1 r'�.,ws Zx(1, to 1. 'F -f .\ ] ,5 OAK p +dt,ix :G,-,^6 7F' fs`e1 f0 sG�I 5 , ��• .Ai „; eit •A �, (*,, •ar,R.9000 ■®�I� <?x A `A { '©�j u,i .R.tD ' ' .u....K�. Op'y.7t17,,. -i'� t'ywY.A,iaoefldi"+ :,lrt p 'r t ".si`+' RY'E ;..5', .E! PINE !X{"' ST: 12r�• �� /� �� "�. 'J,, am.'' ..4 `h ' 4+s_ ooQ Y.0 �;4: of tEJ.• a .tt,' ,:?t y % .�. �_pi SA NOLS r1?.:: ` 1e :c..., 1 Ant ,,V�1 = .epp�o;. .. NAOV . ©� io'n,-'''s'®ICWy,;„ �cnQ ,,: IIN 5C es.:: : ret '4. i;.1 e• x ''''- s'''15'''''. a!iFacV N's` 44111T. t';Y 2^rsy . 0 N 'so -. , ,-- 't r /1st `AOL , 8 . I �,�/i�. %Y a "gt;$/,1•. �^ WV•"0' .Aa:..B J4 'rir:.• y'. ”�H a :. {SWr. $'AG :. AH i,15,,„621E4,110;',_Tlg s, R` Y ..., ,. .b. '..•„limy�', n � � �lI ��J`���33� „4-211§5,,,,,-..o• � �s fi•�s"�? .� ,'»� s^' ,,� aaC9� NG51 F -�i , f�r�_ ���'®IQ a tI. � -'pr" ;ii„''!' ..:V•CE..Ax�lLYp.,T:7 tish.d1�k4®•V/`�'ND'H»!,DAKOTA: z° ..il Yd!L'B> '�!1:f16� Ty m .it]r �• tri r „ T�F .4,�t.r s •rcr`.,,...a 99WW.�`.i• ''':4;'.3.. ":. 31 Ea 61xE pp ..II r , y�,• ,� 'x d• i..._.•.CA,a. -n• !i 1g r� 'r�= FJ �.. .r.' t ►'�'.I Flo..Nit;±.s.% + � '. ; 1d'"4yiCi *�.•sv i , .'*�.►4 "�,C.W 1:IC l 9 \ •� �6 a ;i�' ,, r® [ pl,n�'�%`�.,M ' >� *.:°,l� `t �k ;.t ;.;Approx. Trail Alignment ∎6( < : ar y4 r :.'. , �$ t g yp �,,. 4 : . a :� ° I 4.94.' X36•' ' •' ,' : '' 3- I rX',7 'Y„�•"•, v�^ ., y••:..,f:w'a 1:v'��,'�r . _."hY, ^'A: [ ' �:�'m. Q, g• r SWy•F F Lg''''•\•Ry� <.I A c •';r:,, L., I PuuY CT a Y, ,,t y,�, J��a3h . � td'f�1l�,,q�i,,`'g�.4rip`k� :IOC '✓",' a�j��SM A� `rr •"r7r•'..'A�;' GjQi�{ ''��3 F ��';'_ �4•y 'St,?}. t A' (E17 4%. •�4 ;lit `� k'-':5T!I ISM HAINES I,;j. 7'.I?:��e""� tf. y , ud e: ,y ,.:4 t' s y ;:A€k� c"0.'}fh °`� 1L4�is �, (�Ql s QpC �i rY r = : 600o v1 t i s,rc�a .®: L iAt,. '..::, 1., ,..,,w'�"i.,.. . .„: r i; :+ _r• ., tt ,, _ v„,. \� .1 Sr :, f-s' :a�,. :ri .rt ST.i e,:' ' trfr•M14� wnaNr� 1i'p, ,°- •r=' r,. ,u'""•r 11I X' •,i� D ♦@., \�- t e,4_ Gj l� • ,- Y-^ ` 1,' ` Rt�� _ :,� { .d�y�� p5 A�.A .:Y,.•®K � .I.,h #��,.�y"',:r.r,�y�,1/,�\11 a(\ �r .r�r/�•�7Qj��:' � � �t :' /��. �01��Q�'` �� � +'L�.!W�"k j� -LL[ ��671� .1i�I F R � C� `., ir$`:iT � . , "� 41(.k,'''•.;'••`i•.J T . . :• s. 's i, , u'p 94 \' •>' .;i .'P.' R/ _,.,,, _Iti'a.4ff 1 ei%',_'B.JJ l. ._ a - " % �����'��rp,t, _�®�� ` � � �;:.:��—�: �� , r1i,•:�aQ�� .��� �-�. fie_,�,:��.� � _ _ _ ,_ _ ' ��...�V',Ae'Y,�y�` rn�r� el:, � •3�;" .•�'�;:��aiY ��,r,r:r.7i 'R` '^• �`i't� �`/';y�y�_ �.'� , * }�,t .7� ® ,'�''•� i• ��� ,P ���',tn.°s+i'.•a�T'..A6.J_F1/i1�""��w 4'®� raG '`,°j 1 •'�'.; '�f 3� I4.E`9° yrE'n° Y�SrD`f,,+ 6 :V�P •.w.�e� � �Q� ,•f �. s r" i, 'ELMIti IFL ?L;<!: �LiPcil 'C.',JaF1d,. �,'.Lr..,.,+`,`�„' ¢ys y ,!! di Q T 4.+.. 1'F A ....:1SA Rt �.1 +�.i r \, f T: r \n � A. JC i � .* �.' '$'pr .,.otrk f e�� 7 rr:�r' n.roSH NE f/��4 L CRi� •A is a i r�P�9,:, -"�� SL6•' A to•.. fii .r,-,• ,. w!M1`:�,f�.C,. •BEd R+ ��i3i ,�'ro".pci• �Y . rSNly NKL1N �• :r �, N� /�''S 5, � ..� A :"�` ..x:. dE,a_i, C �> i Sy"' ERIUL 4 �j,,+ •O�.Y / 4+'" .,Vp' (���.. 7 119`,t,N`.P 'SW*i:E1�EUNU> F.. . ..F wq'C, _:� i• :':'6,:::0'.-,,,,, rtl _ q�, � ) � l 5. da A J ,p > E; . SV r,IIJ rr,. ,'u.•l�O; .'.'�` I -.• �' S = _ I Dh u "'f 4�. ' L ��r �. 'a•. t rt Trir' a' r - y 3 :: 0p 4. , a ALNUT` , y�SW a� �-' �F<�r i tNl Sie� � . 0 �' ,F 1 rA ® o�4 RAW. 4d j' ' �• acs •s 3 '`10'00 1 •L:ALN -sA, ✓s¢ •r sy a f` '4•'3r,• cN , -; ' E `�1 '..'e• /�+'ra 1 s ,yly' _ c . c�,,i3' c sW t,., _ j�. _ - _ yE�x 7` _ tlNWT• Y�41 !w' SW ALD RTC [■I� <' — � .IN ' 'Ir ""��� ; .�•.Vf;X .., l.Es+• d 's,1,Fy.,r;'.� y',u' m' +Saxi;�. �f: `sTL'"y m "°lI1� s+_ ,.4 1 . AST■ rl4: 'P t•. , s TKINS.4� .,Etta y t'- . 0 U , r7� ', � Y 9 a �7 - EEEiii k.c, t� 12500 rONNEA $T 'Q V t• 4 I .l 9` O rr a.4111 •. d ,'R •J ' lq., 4 �t r is -0 a {„ M; a _ •r r i42 - PC1R� r I _r I]I�r d a r' R 4 'S`"', . . ...-t,:. {�.VB� tr 3,.wit 'v 7r � � ''.t6i^ y ja,,. ..L •,, ,Nr-�l' •tl : •1'1., t,t '�s-. kv , p �. 1.,.. r L g '�il' d I NN.A '.yf:'4• Nair— �+�•1i47rpa. �r �C rfj'' `��sW HARION 21' W p'-f4: QI a0`•4" :f 'A)~•' �• 'f- s,1 .-- -r,;f4r. PY 74° `' , �-b►� i.;i�k', •i' ri f 1�;�. •4 /p�,,i•,�.�s�,a'r1 6,' As. . A, C•";„, .,.. .0 '.a r :.� r�'i"} '.y l� '1r M1 I±i i TD+u 4-,„3.,,,,,. � '' /`. • ..."C�v a�' 52-c 1'� '4 pP Y� t : lY r t +� 'G`: Ifl:,�„ Sjy '•iat Fi . .\ a_ 1 f i, - i, 74.' t-G '1. ---77-,,,, •� ,:I ybs i si c''-f �}s :i° M.i r�fR.: '. 5.4: :d ,•N:. K nil j, ,4• ,i/ `1 217 t ' �t 41��1 'r1� '¢ S 3i� A VER IL' P �t�� r'.0 1-i Y,17 a �` '' , � •i • t,4 t s,,e�� .aar,` :,�:'. ,' "`• , C� y -a. 'sN¢ ; n` r♦,t S' .:A•r" "� y 4 �! SW u. G r tt a..hu.5�........:1,V2.4% i •< -4<.{^,I sy• .•�� r in. 3`A`�,A rlduv. a '`.. i,CJ��Q V"yvy.� tF P », g,.� (.''.7E; - R �. DBURG I=..� .a1 t . ".- rt..F'� wss �' u 5 r ti i S C9{r9i DGEW001 1 sWw aDtl tr/ E t 11;1 ,ar,r - .,,uA A e..' _:'i t4 t;1•t.�__ lf y� . ;im� �. ri,. .rr'' • �:r j.':�? �5 D V. y2e5r. 5'4 SY.' C . g PAR R..h• "H t1 r_ St 0r t )i, t.• . *IL' ♦x J .1 4''Y' t .h k'`R�''o»taT � ,� .` Sy 2t -''Y] F' ms's.'1'-tA_. •ic _k4 r,.%.jr ,,4,%„. te".,:,•,'• -` E� N'® swFit tea` :>#hIC�O A "Jr� , ''•7',1.�`.Tlr, F. ys ,; .' NTEk T',� �1 ��'.�; KRUS 4'•rt�•P �?• f4 x..,t: A is r }Q ?, a - _ I•l ". 1 ! '''';''k \�Z® I NEZ ''. NP D!. Erm t9FII:1r Aga m S''.• —'3� t ti •.. .;,;•,... Y 3 /,U /+� ymi., .lo . - .4.A ,:,qtA ®o q '{ ..ISy,, h.$,'c'., ,.64-it-,.Z3.f A 1, q '�'�' _ uu _ 'fi 'o !! !! -���•C'yea g 1; I�:a ek,.'s;�i'ai' „..,:5;,1....-la f Ai a�:.*:- g, .+!A ° .,. Y,- t a '..q-,.,;:,.4,' • Lra'v,': ..,•s i e- ,:a� �' '+1 •h r -� I Ro v 44 la ,t' 4 r EO :f e'1 7 1 P�t�� 1F •r: EI �r A' "A'.4 q `,Rv� 8r, '��°N?�'{� a�^'°Y.y�R •t,',pAl�,• "E t� U:7L743,�"P../....6.1. fis. 1 �t 'BONI'TA� y �.E,sa�• _. �.SW�' RONITA !�i � C_��la P < 5 A 3:UL'LI' ^`?� - NTA N�f3i 'sf j'.' s. - r1717:‘,..o ]v. 6r II. T : i. ,� I..... ,I{ d y ^ R AAG 1p.�.'"i.�l,^ �;} �j , �y '`�i M' 5000 f• a'l n II.F""t:•IT A_' 'k E N . 5,t.S ?+ 1'Y '•1ri 41.a` tiro ,r. �• i .:' Y?_ . . ir` Ai . 1e :C1•X y1 :. •I UNG I•r� LN 1.■ 04 E' .m syJ�.rns i ZU 99W . n^ F,,.,WW444:04,' , Atli I 1 ' ? a{ Pu :°tea ors �Q 4 f a s., !F 9W . < r F• ,�"4] `., r ' :11" :EV fl.,. 'v 2 (in$ ''''7 °'rii.;,. .'N;R,_,•• d.f f y5 u'. " ,ii1 'yhs `-t.� 'F ;3g1ir :t' `t '^♦i it; . SW ,lu:'- ■, , '" 'j.7 ''` lI '� r.,.. •' �v r U4 m. �1,, :•• t'`.yiiii '"IF' I • C -1?� ',Ltitii,j1 G rI' " '��,•n7 �D, AI B! Nc` Q ��' G7tt�.d1�} _ _Gr S51 SHAKESPEARE RD �,F .�;. v,r 91..c.�.,� .8 •fp ryfR:l �/ t4.''. ,'-iuu;nx. l'S CE.VR �tal6L•t-7CUa I,.k�Fit 0....efti, ,�, ,�p���,• ��t�, ��.- $'t e.3e/eZ Ays.,,;a ai ' 4rR Ft . _ " a F s P�"" <' vx�t�q�� �r j� rat. 'sr.` UN Y �� *Po / f�;�t7 11Ey Y^� �6N _,Y w 7 y '1: ` t�i(•'' �� �,t Yii ' S'�, a ` _ 7 , , - , N 5,. 'kin r q to �B'+,,O `R tIja r. :.. P'' T.k� . ` � a f`� ',zi�` .Air, �, .. ' al0 �sti lityl-n K Av.''0.' .,0,,P !tor. Rp i. Q f a :; ,� "'• r <} ij. •S sL, R Cs1 �u:J. . h,. � I A i uuJ'�. SPA D fyi r-" ERF�, sS ,,j ..? ' .' Vn. " , {a� i ?�' 4 •Q�4�•, HARM , sN ^r W f Fanno Creek Trail Permit Fj�j ,. `I ; ,�'q"I.., ''`' `,� v :e a•rL� ', , �r ,finy*,: 1 zAY, , Y i _ ,RDN, STI� fi tt3;3a9 �A:�r"^ ,y`.'. .�.+ A_.M S .7,T.4Ex a 0._.-:RUas.l: �' \� 9°' �y.Q :i B '�1 ►'I t err T h s•'y J",j $ L ! ,°, r I 4 � cr„�d q'�l' �j�� �r r �� � i !`i��� sye strut_ �.• r:• Sheet �. of 9 1 1/98 ^� �.,� { A Sheet 1 . Trail Location Map ,I A, , E E { ”' 1 _Y.. ._�. rvnna., ...:..ANIMA a.; :a.lt{l�L2f., fl la. .. 1 � �� i .,• 1., _......,•,...•. .,,...._.,q n-rr, ..- i nva: me R P _I NJWYA,,1'L�i7-0 .4.,/ 11113fit�EE///�i KHAM... • 41110., • o : I ! N..........''''''.- Met,of T� 4��` 1;�• o - I I I 5/8" Iron Rod Fowler School '.\te \ .i :. Ballfield \ -WVjT//�E yj ` 1 YPC Marked Running nee 10 ';m I ' Backstop Folder Scholl ,i ` CH ENCR PLS 990• • `�=Vj.•�31!� um`I/ Iron R•d \ . . r , IvORPC Mwk 140' • ��� /�, •• ` "Fitness 1/ Iron Rod nes• • • Workout .4 PS I 5/8"-Ion Rod j % 1i, ,,�� j W PC Marked_ Cours. No Cap. Bent /zR Si.• Equi ment yr.--,11.�r�, %/��:" Course Si•n "pEA CONTROL p •` I .„r�/� • �N x i.15IMIIIMIIIIIIIIIII �J/� „�.'� \ Eby 4.::::... _ _ , 1& ' 1 "Iron Rod#A1 i of v ,:.•. +.+_ •.• •DEA CONTROL �� v\�. �. '\Ei/1 Workout . Ito _ -1 _ ....... ... -... .:. ��= \414 Equipment \ 1 ^ - - . ........- I'+ ''1 .... :-c: 1 I 1-8: \ ••i) ♦ _ "Fitness•r•urxrA O 4'1 Begin construction /A O O I 1. // r./ a,\ \ O p• s O Path Centerline 1 174 6,+C\ / o n 1 U MI-N 761515.4697 zynk Fen \ + �� 4 E 7615 54. ill a o •.'� 1 lid Jon Exist Sidewalk Y'\2 �,, fi O\ Wel7--A�(D ( MPAGT A t2 10+04.51 .: ` \ 1 1 Const. Steel Pmts 2 ea... ♦ "a PK O 1 i I / \ I I /� ROW �i :I ♦ v E I \ I I \ 1 7 I I Tap of Bank ___,V /1\ \\ I i I \ I I / �\ ` 0 I I /i-- �// \\ �N Curve Table p \\ II / // / \\ \ Curve No.Length (ft)Radius(fl) Ddto Tangent I ♦` . ` I I // /� I \\ 1 14.21 1400 81-2J-52 6.60 • a , I • • 12.34 10.00 70-42-13 7.09 \\\ \y// / 1 \ \\ fI 57.09 74.00 44-12-13 30.05 r.l I 1 \ \ O 112.58 134.00 48-08-09 59.65 1 I I Z �'� 5/ ' Iron Rod \ 11:1\s•-4---....// �/ \ \ 20.79 50.00 23-49-05 1454 I I wW/gYP 0 294.34 175.00 96-22-02 195.61 �• "bBEC PLS 2553" \ I \ \ 0 53.86 100.00 30-51-34 27.60 I I• I•• 24+1g46 1 ' \\I I , 1 0 42.17 100.00 24-09-34 21.40 ' U >A 5 8" IRON ROD (I (\\.. ' ' 0 39.27 25.00 90-00-00 25.W 1 4tOO" W/AL CAP MARKED •oO \ I [. 20.24 15.00 77-19-38 12.00 •1 I I I KURAHASHI PLS 1945 :j I\ \\ ft 22.62 15.00 86-23-10 14.08 P I FANNO9 1997" rf 5/8" /8'PC/ontaAC d r • ` \\ I / 1 �`` \ \ I I I �08EC PLS 2553" ` \ \‘•1 \ `\\ / / ,.•; \ •P Nail•\ \ \ \ / / \ -\•• i Pathway \ f r \ f S/B" Iron Rod • ♦ , \ LEGEND .t \ t NARK W 4• _ "/YPC Marked \ \ \ • +-\C Marken !BRIDGE Sign 1 1 UeBEC PLS 2553" Brill � L" " 9 ROW ` \ \ P • SURVEY CONTROL 1 I 1 UNLAWFUL O DISTURBO .. I \\\ \\ `1•: ' 6• psi I 6 �, \ \\ \\ ����� ' I ' , 3 3a \ \• !/\ 1141 27+80.35\�VII:✓ . \\ \ 1 Cant Steel Pmts - 2 eo\ CTE M... I kOilA 2 SECTION CORNER \\ \\b� • \\ \ I Ij 2 End 7653433.+89.609188 2.75' 3 1 2 ALUMINUM CAP `�_ .� if 1- MARKED "WASH. CO. \ / \ y�RPC CONTROL" \� _� 7 /�1 ' 761 , SURVEYOR TO 1982 D \ ■ �t �• r UNLAWFUL TO DISTURB- \ _� J \ t/2 Iron Rod \`__ Top of Bank if Er586':11 / ■ �\ �YY/ U 0,\,... 4 Existing Asphalt Trail \ \ \ P2% ses�r�l 4 tit 17+,• onitary MH NOTE: Steel posts shall be constructed m per \ \ \\\ \\ 31 i "` Rim=154.86 Standard Oetoll No. 192 of the Standard _ \ <<.1Cr. \ \ IM=154.05•Oetois. Pmts shall M ` \ \ p� S arm 4.painted with red -�MAN.17 11/M Pathwa \ \ .,M 1�and white stripes. am soar.9/s 7 ` \ \ L �5/8" Iron Rod e 2.5• 5' 5' 2.5 ` ` � \-\ \ \ \ :.cote �I !r;�8 -5� STEEL POST DETAL Existing Ground 'F--n o-:"7"_ 'c •;��ti 3- Cass -C• AG \'\ \ Fanno Creek Trail Permit �_5 ___ I N.T.S. ���% 4 Ns, .\ \■ Sheet 2- of 9 1 1/98 • %' o �� 27[saps $,` ' \ \ i i ---■ Aggregate Shoulder `r/�r�" e��+4'•_O .��`` Mail - 3/4- - o• cryp) �> . FR A FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 2 �c�' *Q UI tN VANNIE T. NGUYEN TYPICAL SECTION :LL„1ij1�'�. TIGARD STREET AOouTEDEMAN AVENUE ■N.T.S. OILEGOK `V4't1 M 1, am OF 11^ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FILE N0. 260 OMG NAME: !QT Sheet 2. Segment 2 Trail Location and Wetland Impact and Bridge Over Summer Creek STAFF OREGON L,M ILK.N.I.Ilb 1sn•� syUSS I aolrtrxrc>'co«o•r . p�a�'�as-gym CIP96_ NAENG\1998\FANN02\51TE Li 'LT paA r1-sr, •• Z0-Y9 I / • - - - - - I- - / L j I / / // - MEADOW STREET — g� / co- / N 10' 00.00 5 E 7315613.9251 I Join Exist 3 I it / II I 1 �= p ;loader , 1 I I fi _E Curve Table �«iyr • I 1 t \ �- Curb No. Length (ft) Radius(ft) Delto Tangent (ft) 2 3/4 gross Cop , �.,i'i?i `�� 1t ° w• Marked City of C' tip;, I•v o ,W 0 21.18 10 121Z1'S5' 17.61 Tigard Control Point" Q 9 0Q. `�,• _ 0 13.07 15 4954'50' 6.98 *Oak - - 5/8' Iron Ro — o, . // ■ p •- No CoP. +0.4 — — \ + os - - Q 28.60 25 6512.36. 16.09 30 CM••,�`��=��•:•�= 12+00 13+00 N S Tj - •"fir c� `z � y,� 34.93 25 79 49'34' 20 91 V °\_ailing B d9 iO � i I — •_I — I — 4+00 I 15+00 +',:, � - - 36.15 25 9251 00' 22.06 I -/ PK\Nail lR -- nC. - _ - _ - - - - - -tor- v �► - —� �\ ��st f't r CON • soni, 7r Y 1 C�� _L',• Troll P�N3 5/8 Iron)Rod l 1 1 Rirn.157.9a 5/9'kon Roa /) • / future I,y� w/YPC Marked w/RPC Marked Kotheri Street w � '° 0�pN q1 OBEC PLf 255.1" I "6-0.0.T. Contra- e . I, r I I I �Q Metro Q~ ,Robert & Christine Everett 600 NE Grand Ave. X41 I r 10240 SW Kotherine Street 1 1 r� Section Corn Por Uond, OR 97232 I Tigard, OR 97223 C)�j� � � •�it�.' \wash•Co.Alum. � . fii I l\\ \1 CAP SEC Caa •, •I _ •oth y 8 Cwn seine I is, ao. ,ss g 1 I I \ 1/2" Ir•- •od \ /PRC Mor -. atheoy Centerline 150 "UEA Control" I 11/11 for Future I \ \ cast Johnson Street Top of Kenneth le Alice Tolliva I I \ \ Bank I I 10200 gurdKatherine 9223treet 1 1\ � /8�ton R 1V� �i �� � ` � �� \4; 1 I II I Tt0d+0.1 cA 1 ` �\ Sanitary , •�•. - - , •• \ \ — — \ `. �__� _7 I I i \ / \ - � /// \ \ :11 $ 5/8" Iron Rod w/YPC Marked I 1 ` \ \ • Doris do Assoc. PIS 2 64" \ \ aV I I -/2'Yon Rod I I \ \ /RRC uorkea 6' Chain Block Wall 1 1 ' 'DEA Contra' ��,4 Ilr 5/8"Iron Rod I Link Fence w/Board Fen e I 1� No Cop, Bent. Pr one Tank ' Sanitor .••lrr 4" +0. 1 81 k Wall w�Guord Posts -I I y ,-k J - anitar w�Choin Link F - Rim=150.84 -4 S Obgy Learsh x ` Ur�' • Rim=15y1.0l ,,,' low Sign ' e-` A �• V /. 1/ Iron Rod I I �� ,+� e • �f" Sanit�__�C� "DEA Contrd' • NIkii. 1.1 .111: _`v4,� tt'' I ron e< ra� Q1+00 ;•3+�� 1 4. ` .. 4SPha/f P IIIN:I I� �,_. • I — --� 1 • , 0-k,;,,,Co-XE/ / / O� ee ` E' •y �r•��• . Segm t 4 t•\� ` M Palh.oy / f4'!� 15a 7 'PK 8 L,� .t 1 9.9 / 1 \/ / / / aly of regard .� OI J wre Fence ■`10 0 2.5' 5' S' 2.5 / ottiry Td125 sw nar 28 a. ./4� / voor-o-ton Esktinq Gourd / O R—T49.77 raDra. Nt 9rxu� 8:8 �, / / ce • Yi\i\ 3.Ctass"C" AC `� / � '��I ���� Sand. �� /� •+ as, / / Top of / �� \ / tam Aggregate Shoulder "7/�r� ��� 1 \ Bonk /'/17" \�� 1I Yon 3/4' - 0' (Tx1) 8' of 3/4'-0 ;.,., \� \ / i NO GREEK/� _ - \ \ 'b 1 1 w o \�` FPN , III =_ 1�, \ Fanno Creek Trail Permit E4 =W • TYPICAL SECTION \\�, Sheet 3 of 9 11/98 N.T.S. FANNO CREEK TRAIL-SEGMENT 3 4�+ t VANNIE T. NGUYEN • Alk oarEmNa a '11111II1 TIEDEMAN AVENUE YTOO WOODARD PARK Ilk`� On LLOF 11GARD ENGINEERING OEPARTMENT ftLE NO. 260 0140 NAME: >�i Sheet ' Segment 3 Trail Location KARLEEN W.AICHELE OREGON uwserwu MO �°°� wM/� O1OMEDR"a 1O"O"" 'a �1r CIP9a- N:\ENG\1996\FANN05\sITE L1 rut erA"no • • • i i \ - AI / N I / \ A , 1 /I ,1 sii, ..-------........„110,,y...0 r *. . , , , , \ � :a \ \ / / • `�` Exist Parking lot / Properly Line \`` / ' ...,........7 2......... �1 / r _ / / / /I n 4\ / // /II // / ,/****...* / // renal \\` F\\ `��a Frye Oectronic Inc / ..\ / / ./ / q�\ 0 9826 SW Tigard SL .,........,/ , \ ��--- \\\ \ Q ���` 4 • • • Exist Parking Lot % �/ �� / `.. \ \,_ °\ IPAcrialit A:1 4 - ":1 '-_-=t'=--- ____ / //-- / / ` \ �� •.. ..:.iii \, ?' /,`i •...;,..(2 .( `_`� I FANNO CREEK—\ �`` �.�1/, /".. 0 dk\lo / `>/l /// /� LEGEND a \ �-�•. fig ..� Q Upland Also -►��\ ��� yillit ,/ // // Hletiond Impact Area \ 0 �.1 �.r j'" 4CP4'"‘i�, 0 T[ '*./1 1 .,$ 40 .e. 0 vi 4 .. , p.ti;$1411:-. •Z■i:$4.6.'7 ■ J,\\ / md t2'!�*/' i •:, .: �I`/ a e. -... ..•••• ..• 4. ao Vgl I I ILN. IVO I., 9 s-1% 2..„(3h,("7 Pathway . r! 2.5' 5' 5' 2.5 Existing Ground \�,.r .: WETI-&14D IMp�T �-:r ��t 2X Slope—� -, ���� o + Ott/ '��.W -�7�� / N fir.£ Aggregate 4- - 02' / o n= Yat'I - 3/4 - 0"(Typ) 8.OF 3/4.-0 „‘i1i. / 4. a / / 3N Z W 7! SECTION A—A ( 1 1 _ lop' �R/W , N.T.S. N. NT.S. _ Curve Table Curb Na. Length (ft) Radius (ft) Delta Tangent (ft) 1513 50 1720',0" 7.62 Fanno Creek Trail Permit 2 4840 50 55-27'36" 26.28 ,/ /� 2 46.47 50 ss-22'54" 26.24 - Sheet �f• of `'7 1 1/98 4 50.56 200 14-29'05' 25.42 I / 0 84.67 200 241518" 42.98 (el 8830 200 2517'44" µ.b8 • 49.68 100 28.34.46" 25.47 0 „ FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 4 C1 !17'iR�� VANNIE T. 40./YEN oa, , ,Piml� WOODARD PARK TO GRANT AVENUE %iiatmcc." ' _.LLL i LAYOUT aN TIMID ENGINEERING OEPARTYENT FILE NO. 260 OtYG NAME: INLET Sheet 4. Segment 4 Trail Location and Wetland Impact and Bridge Over Fanno Creek KEEN Y. AIGHELE OREGON u,asxwAr aw 1 (� W..w I oa•rrx..a 110•00AN `�t°w��' cle98- N:\ENG�1998�FANN04�SRf L I r.e li2 •-n•. • • v� Sle. .gore 19x6'• 4*_\. *'..Y.---...:� `f ./Pore.Yawn ' O Rin�151.67 , . or �� ��.� 4w, /� • !f ,♦ +` \ 5//B"Fen Rod■ Renard Wicks J No Cap 12x6 SW Gent Ave. ./ 1� ��`+.�� /\ \ Nord.OR 97223 �, 1 \ / J I 11 „,/, ,/ �9 ,stns m.rein mw. .qa4 OR 9722.5 ��,� \.. ...,..•,...s ,/ --k o it / Gib / __ r +'' / ± / `\ CRFFk \\\\ / 0 ; ; ; \ . .PK Noll I / / /., °,c\ • ■ • ■ ��`� � 1 1 ^�i'\ea cede \l _ I ■■ 3 Chain =ie.v C.- t bw1 1� I Link Fence v + •.r.e..E�•t Cant / 1/Y Fon Rod \ 4 4 Q` I I / RPC Marked DEA Control" 0 r • ..• I / Baeketedl Link I r_' MooD / crate End Cautruction / Robert Bas.&Sherry worse / wall I 2255 NW Johnson Shwet. t .�\ 1/2"Yon Rod I N 651257.9942 • / • Portland.OR 97210 • of RPC York • I E 7618237.1143 / // "DEA Cant..F I Join Exist Conc Path / / / . / / / Gty of Tigard / r �}—17125 Sw htas&b 1 / 1 natal R 97223 uorton Properties n I / 5529 SE Foster Road 1 • / Portland.OR 97206 / 0 1 Pathway Poy o/ I 1 1 25' 5' 5' 2.5 / Existing Ground / 1 1 1• X„,.w.. r Class'C' AC / 1 1 2,/Y eras Cap �l�!�6\�1� / ,/2'Feq Rod named"OR.state / r/RPC Narked 11 / •0n Noy.Tap of T7 1941' • (. 2><Slop!y 'DEA Central' ^ a Aggregate Ut --_ `./4� 'ENT*Sign ',11441/ \ / \../...-----19609.ad //�/\�' /1663 1/ Nota Average !t!SAloulde /�� '• Prohibited / age Vertical Clearance MOO – J/4' – 0'(Typ) 8'OF J/4'-0 •�\���', Seni�tisi.5, Sign\ •\\ Tram Bridge Ndh.aa4tFeeelaon, Scale: 1' = 50' / 1.�ir Bridge Support\ a �\�s 3'Nvhaa2- , . - SECTION A—A , .,�`. ,2}+ . NOT TO SCALE / 12\�\ \ / _ / / r Cho:, pc(054N Foot d Easement link Fence \ ��/i• Book 1, r Book 183 Page 457 • / / Vdky \ ` / Gella / + \ / ,y /Steps /'',` .\ ' A e, M / ��` /George gooey aY1 \•� ' / ' / 12551 SW Rein Street �a -•4111 Curve Table / / (�G i\ Nara.OR 97223 GO g' Bend, Gtr o! Curb Na Length (/Q Radius (ft) Delta Tangent (ft) /4 G� / . � 00 • 1garc Sgn Bross eras./Bross o 15.71 10 9000'00' 10.00 Q Weisner Marked 0 15.73 10 9006'56• 10.02 /� t7� ' \/ ro.her Ls:s0,' �\\ Q 63.29 75 4932'41' 34.88 / .....-'77.- Plc N. \ EI°p ent 0 18.46 25 4218'40' 9.67 - .� ,' \l\ © 31.55 75 2406'13' 16.01 /' ■ / 5��� eawnk J \ 0 53.86 75 4108'45' 28.15 / / / — \ aoltnq 0 35.56 25 8r30'06' 21.54 !)`P / on eriag. 5/s"Fen Rod Fanno Creek Trail Permit ' S'N . 5/y'PC Narked , 17.94 _ 25 _ 4106'24' 9.37 Weer PLS 2801• • / Sheet 5 of 9 1 1/98 1 e` FANNO CREEK TRAIL-SEGMENT 5 `C��7:G �A VANNIE T. NCUYEN 4� °°' R , III��IIg, GRANT AVENUE TO MAIN STREET _.Ll rlI LAYOUT • 'a. CITY Ce ^-RD ENCMIEERINC OEPARTAtENT nu NO. 260 OMC NAME: !QT Sheet 5. Segment 5 Trail Location IURLEEN Y. AICHEIf aREIbN stn:.reha aka I maws "�st� I ohoFttaNC,Ew.aAN ; aP96- N:\ENG\1998\'ARNO5\5RE Li • y • • Curve Table Curb No. Length (It) Radius(ft) Delta Tangent (ft) 0 13.78 19.17 4110'50' 7.20 O 13.17 15 5018'15' 7.04 O 16.03 11.79 7753'23' 9-S3 O 25.40 15 9700'53' 16.96 \ \ 0 42.32 115 2195'05' 21.40 © 19.37 200 05'32'59' 9.69 -. 5' WOODEN FENCE ON Q 8.74 10 5095'26' 4.67 5660 SW M tJ RETAINING WALL 12566 SW MAIN V\Q . ��� / \ 0,1. .d�j1.� ..„4,,, , 6• CHAIN V C LINK FENCE Mg& .6 n° ����Y�`� r — DAVID do CHRISTINE HAMMOND QC a [ V 8 g$o• \ + 12562 SW MNN \ GGG7777 dd 0 _\ oo Easement Easement m KS W ts Z © /, 0 •\• BRIDGE 5 j I 3' Claa C AC \ \\ / 1 -....—25 '......66,A01111111 amer rd \\t,„.... ... i _..... s.1 *.„, 1, r ' 4, I ili Gil e•of 3i<•-o MB 00 �! �� 14W. -".ThIMIIIP Existing Ground \ �� =°— Q ���� � ,� �� SECTION A-q Nom., � f —� ��� ' \ \ 4 WI,-V,,f• -gliti.1.-ip VIIII 4ild■ ■..___111. ".•••1.1■•■•■---------..010-0 6-0."'":—/.■• .„./..e---;314-.• lie .4A s o —111111 1 0101 w Easement PATHWAY Easement 1 4- I I © I W cr 4' I I a 4' (n Rai-nq ► - 8 m I 1 I ms Z• Oedceq I OOLAN Y E INC. OECTRIC QQ`ai� W..'2 a [ I // y I 1 / / 12520 SW MAIN STREET 18' x6'aue Lam I I I U) r- I I SCALE-1:._ o-r e a" / ' I III —41° f .i\\\-K■%As PAGE N. STEVENS I 1 . Pia STEVENS �11X 9180 SW BURNHAMI STREET I • E:blinq Ground — I Fanno Creek Trail Permit Sheet & of 1 1 1/98 SECTION B-B A FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 61 � VANNIE T. NGUYEN asxe°I xM� .LL°I1O' AT MAIN LAYOUT STREET `�'1'T1 N t arr OF 71GARD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FILE HO. 260 o NAME: FT Sheet 6. Segment 6b Trail Location and Bridge Over Fanno Creek ItAREEN M.AICHEE OREGON use xa.MU.lie i UPC@ Wc/° I CNOWEI IC ao«a r w iii aP96- PIAENG\1996VANN06\SRE • • I I I • I o EXISTING PIPER'S WILLOW FOREST I 1 -J'-. ! _ \ Edge of ' 'IV ° - \ , I 5/8 Iron Roo Track I ,• mil I. I w WC Marked Fowler School 1 •u:. Bollfield CH ENGR PLS 990• (a < 1a.la Scholl i I Running Field �7 Al S m Backstop 1n9 \ �� �.• c c I , Boll field , ��� �l- ..•,�::• � Wm.,/- ,ran R SHRUB ENHANCEMENT AREA , F,Li W�RPC York . I I 5/e- Iron Rod �•' : `V� EA CONI'R•� _ _ 1/ Iron Rod - nes Workout PS I /NO CaP, Bent • /�'���� !�� -Fitness W RPC Marked Cours ` Equipment ••, - I Tlf• 10,0• Q • -_ /z j //4.'4. N•2 s� course si.n -pEA coN TROL'�� �' /� s "sby•!';:•. 1/ Iron Rod��� tom, -•'-.i.',-°_ - �— IL410111IIIII%Amkk•4 , I , RPC Marked C _+I4� / - •w A CONTROL'/"/ Top of :•. f •.. .:. •.�_ , .• r r i •.. ... t��� . u r� f/� workout . ` -- . • 4e`�' ` `k. / Equipment ♦ 0 4 - ...A.- - - - _-- - i � �� �. 1 1 .?�y. ` y .Filnes3••• rs� . O O r�•0 O `... r 8o91n Canstructicn •444.4 .,1 O O b >�� O "� V';:7.•• Path Centerline N 652146.3174 \ 6• Ch• �. � ^ I O S.•.'�q � I `\ , �` -- 1 1 � �` °, _ •S,�le EXISTING OREGON ASH FOREST :PROPOSED •\ 1 • 1 10+04.51 -9 (` --- '' - CansL Steel Posts - 2 eo,� 4PK o PROPOSED PIPER'S WILLOW 50• • 2.x. J'l` / FOREST vi RDw � o %,✓1 ----- --1 --\\\ OREGON ASH Isl 1 I 1 \ i 1 Tap of hank /�_---� �i \\\\ \\\ FOREST P I• X. \ ` \, 1, I // ! / • 1 \\ \\ , ` \ / I \ 1 i 1 \ �\-4 \ ='�0I 1 / \ I I / \ Z ;✓�PC•uarRlcod \ 1 \ \ I 24+18.48 , - BEC PLS 25s3- \ k 1 1 I I \ 't - \) ' , S4 I S/8- IRON ROD l I 1 ,1#11• 1 I WWKKJJURAHASHI PLSK 1945 I\ \` I / / , \ \ I FANN09 1997"•• 5/8- Iron Rod I \ \ I 1` 1 \ \\ 1 ` \\P Nl•\ o; I \ Path.ay \ I LEGEND E 5/8- Iron Rod i 1 ■ ; 1 I -NARRQW W//1PC Marked • �.\G Marked t BRIDGE Sign 4 -68EC PLS 2553- �• \ • Bridg- \ ® Wetland Impact Area ` L•� C 1 ROW \ \ �(�1 ►��\ ---_--- 2 3/4-brass Cap \ t \ 1 \\•--1- 11110 Marked CITY OF TIGARD , \ tl `l: 1 \ t SURVEY CONTROL 1 I 6w : UNLAWFUL TO DISTURB" \ \\ .1.\ ••••■ -WO ""•••., ip 3 34 ` \\ \ J1jfr1: 2 o •2 5 ECTION CORN \ \2- ALUMICAP 2• KKEsI Top of Bank - ` �\ \ �� YYY t A4.17.7. Existing Asphall•Trail \ '+` snits. MH • 41' � '�1. Rim=1 4.86 NOTE: Steel posts shall be constructed as per ` \ \\ \\ •124 IY=•154.05. ---- Standard Ostao No. 192 of the Standard •-nar.ao-Fo'an• ` \\\ \ w if .. 5/8- Iron Rod■Details. Posts shall be pointed with red 03MaVn Jda/M Pathway and .hlte drips oat emu-a/sue Y `\ `\ \. \\ • 1' .1!IL� $ - `\ =0 2.5' S' S' 2.5 \\ \ enc_ .L STEEL POST ()ETA!, ,-sass Ac \ , Fanno Creek Trail Permit __ �.� \,\ Sheet "3—of 1 1/98 I I________,_ 4% 21C Slope—r >< . / - Aggregate 4 - 0r 8- OF 3/4--0 v,, 4211 FANNO CREEK TRAIL - SEGMENT 2• Yat'I 3/a' 0' (Typ) j Wam+erc sw�tfA ,,,,�,i,� p;'.tt 'FANNIE T. NGUYEN TYPICAL SECTION TIGARD STREET TO TIEDEMAN AVENUE Sheet 7. Existing Conditions and Proposed Enhancement Mitigation N-T.S o, •1.l'"=�� LAYOUT •s. CITY T1GJ1R0 ENGINEERING OEPARTYENT !QT EXISTING WETLAND CONDITIONS AND PROPOSED ENHANCEMENT AREAS FILE NO. 260 " S II4)98 STAFF OftEGt7N Ca �b Ino•� *MI. o:a.crw.•.c,co.,o,ur , lsa�p astern am- , N:\ENG\199E1\FANN02\SRE L 1 • ��9 • 410 0 Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Type Size Quantity per Approx. Planting Total # (minimum) Template Area (sq. ft.) Plants Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia FACW nursery stock 5 to 6 feet tall 1 31,700 317 Trees Oregon ash** Fraxinus latifolia clump of 3 every 50 feet 13 • Piper's [Hooker] willow Salix piperi [hookeriana] FACW cutting. 4 to 5 feet tall 3 7,000 210 **Total Oregon ash trees = 330 red-osier dogwood Cornus stoloni era sericea FACW nursery 2 to 3 feet tall 2 g f [ stock 3,300 66 Shrubs Pacific ninebark Physocarpus capitatus FACW- nursery 2 to 3 feet tall 1 3,300 33 clustered wild rose Rosa isocar a nursery P P FAC stock 2 to 3 feet tall 2 3,300 66 Fanno Creek Trail Permit Sheet E of 9 11/98 LEGEND loft. Consultants in ecology and natural resource management Fanno Creek Trail - Fowler School Site * I X I X =number of plants within template DRAWN: S.Benjamin Mitigation Plan 10ft. __,� Fishman Environmental Services APPROVED: M.Walker MAN . PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS 434 NW Sixth Avenue • Suite 304 DATE: 11/16/98 Portland, Oregon 97209-3600 Sheet 8. Proposed Planting Specifications (503)224-0333 Figure # 89 Project# 98073 4110 'HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING IS A COMPLETE AND EXACT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL THEREOF. BEFORE THE METRO COUNCIL RillFeet1-V- 0_110111_1A-• U�r Clerk of the Metro Council FOR THE PURPOSE OF AMENDING ) ORDINANCE NO 98-730C ORDINANCE NOs. 96-647C AND NO. 97- ) 715B,TO AMEND TITLE 3 OF THE ) Introduced by Councilors Naito and McLain URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT ) FUNCTIONAL PLAN,AND AMEND ) THE REGIONAL FRAMEWORK PLAN, ) APPENDIX A,AND ADOPT THE ) TITLE 3 MODEL ORDINANCE AND ) WATER QUALITY AND FLOOD ) MANAGEMENT MAPS ) WHEREAS, the Regional Growth Goals and Objectives - Objective 12 identifies the need to manage watersheds to protect, restore and ensure to the maximum extent practicable the integrity of streams, wetlands, and floodplains. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 96-647C, the Urban Growth • . Management Functional Plan(UGMFP), adopted November 21, 1996, delayed implementation of Title 3 of the UGMFP until Metro adopted a Model Ordinance to demonstrate one method of implementing Title 3, and Water Quality and Flood Management Area maps. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 97-715B-, the Regional Framework Plan, adopted December 18, 1997, incorporates the UGMFP at Appendix A. The Regional Framework Plan is awaiting acknowledgment before the Land Conservation and Development Commission. WHEREAS, the Water Resources Policy Advisory Committee (WRPAC), during 1997,drafted a Model Ordinance and maps to comply with Title 3, Section 6 of the UGMFP. WRPAC released a preliminary draft of the proposed Model Ordinance and maps in August 1997, and a revised draft on September 4, 1997. The proposed Model Ordinance was then forwarded to the Metro Policy Advisory Committee(MPAC) and the Metro Technical Advisory Committee(MTAC) for review. WHEREAS, WRPAC and MTAC formed a joint subcommittee to further refine the Model Ordinance and maps and consider amendments to the UGMFP,Title 3, Sections 1-4, and Sections 6 and 7. The joint subcommittee met twice per month beginning September 26, 1997 and ending December 19, 1997. The joint subcommittee forwarded proposed amendments to Title 3, dated December 30, 1997, to WRPAC and MTAC. The same proposed amendments were released for public comment prior ORDINANCE 98-730C Page I • I .. 4 • to Metro's Stream and Floodplain Protection Plan workshops which began January 17, 1998. WHEREAS, MTAC reviewed the joint subcommittee's proposed amendments to Title 3 at its January 8, 22,February 5, 19,March 5, 19, 26, April 2, 16, and May 21, 1998 meetings. WHEREAS, WRPAC reviewed the joint subcommittee's proposed amendments to Title 3 at its January 26, February 9, March 9,25,April 13 and May 11, 1998,meetings. At the March 25 meeting, WRPAC members reviewed and commented on MTAC's proposed changes to Title 3 and provided those comments to MPAC at chair Judie • Hammerstad's request. WHEREAS, the Metro Growth Management staff gave a presentation on Metro's "Stream and Floodplain Protection Plan"(Title 3) to MPAC at its February 11, 1998 meeting. MPAC also received a copy of the joint subcommittee's proposed Title 3 amendments. WHEREAS, MPAC reviewed the joint subcommittee's proposed amendments to Title 3 at its February 11, 25, and March 11, and 25, 1998 meetings. At its March 25, 1998 meeting, MPAC passed forward recommended changes to Title 3 to the Metro Council after considering a package of WRPAC/MTAC recommendations. WHEREAS, concurrently with WRPAC and MTAC's review of • the joint subcommittee's proposed amendments to Title 3,Metro held Stream and Floodplain Protection Plan workshops on January 17, 20, 27 and 31, 1998. Copies of the joint subcommittee's proposed amendments • to Title 3, the September 4, 1997,draft Model Ordinance and Title 3 maps • were available for public review and comment. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Committee considered proposed amendments to Title 3,the Model Ordinance and maps at a work session held on February 17, and at public hearings on March 17, April 7, May 5 and 28, 1998. WHEREAS, the Metro Council considered proposed amendments • to Title 3, the Model Ordinance and maps at public hearings held on February 26, May 7 and June 4, 1998. WHEREAS, Title 3 of the UGMFP as adopted November 21, 1996, has a different effective date and compliance date than the UGMFP generally. The UGMFP has an effective date of February 19, 1997, with compliance required by February 19, 1999. Originally, Sections 1-4 of ORDINANCE 98-730C Page 2 - .• • • Title 3 were not effective until 24 months after the Metro Council adopted a Model Ordinance and maps addressing Title 3 because it was anticipated that drafting the Model Ordinance would take three to four months. That drafting process took one year. MPAC,WRPAC and MTAC recommended that compliance be required within 18 months of Metro Council adoption of the Model Ordinance and maps. WHEREAS,through review at WRPAC,MTAC and MPAC, - Sections 1-4 of Title 3 have been extensively reorganized. •For that reason, Exhibit A will fully replace_Title 3, Sections 1-4 as adopted by.the Metro Council on November 21, 1996. WHEREAS,no significant changes have been made to Section 5 of Title 3. Sections 6 and 7 have been amended and clarified. Therefore, - - Exhibit B only amends Title 3, Sections 5-7 as adopted by the Metro • Council on November 21, 1996, now therefore, • • • 4 ORDINANCE 98-7300 Page 3 • • . • THE METRO COUNCIL ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinances No. 96-647C and No.97-715B,Appendix A, Sections 3.07.310 through 3.07.340 are hereby replaced to read as shown in Exhibit A which is attached and incorporated by reference into this ordinance. Section 2. Ordinances No. 96-647C and No.97-715B,Appendix A, Sections 3.07.350 through 3.07.370 are hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit B which is attached and incorporated by reference into this ordinance. Section 3. As required by Ordinances No. 96-647C and No. 97-715B, Appendix A, as amended,the Model Ordinance at Exhibit C,and the Water Quality and Flood Management Area maps at Exhibit D are hereby adopted to implement Title 3 of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. Section 4. To provide effective notice to affected property owners of the first city or county hearing on the ordinance to implement Title 3,the following effective dates, local hearing and property owner notice requirements are added to Title 8. Section 1 of Title 8 of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan at Metro Code Section 3.07.810 is hereby amended to read: "A. All cities and counties within the Metro boundary are hereby required to amend their comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances tocomply with the provisions of this functional plan within twenty-four months of the effective date of this ordinance. Metro recommends the adoption of the policies that affect land consumption as soon as possible. • B. Notwithstanding subsection A of this section,cities and counties are required to amend their comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances to comply with Sections 1-4 of Title 3 within 18 months after the Metro Council has adopted the Model Ordinance and Water Quality and Flood Management Areas Map." Section 5. Section 2A of Title 8 at Metro Code Section 3.07.820 is hereby replaced to read: "A. On or before six months prior to the 24 month deadline established in Section 1 A, cities and counties shall transmit to Metro the following: 1. An evaluation of their local plans, including public facility capacities and the amendments necessary to comply with this functional plan; 2. Copies of all applicable comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances and public facility plans, as proposed to be amended; ORDINANCE 98-730C Page 4 • • 3. Findings that explain how the amended city and county comprehensive plans will achieve the standards required in Titles 1 through 6 of this functional plan. In developing the evaluation,plan and ordinance amendments and findings, cities and counties shall address the Metro 2040 Growth Concept, and explain how the proposed amendments implement the Growth Concept." Section 6. Section 2 of Title 8 at Metro Code Section 3.07.820 is hereby amended to add a new subsection as follows: "F. On or before six months prior to the 18 month deadline established in Section 1 B, cities and counties shall schedule their first hearing on the ordinance to implement Sections 1-4 of Title 3,or a hearing on implementation of Title 3, if no code amendments are proposed to comply with Title 3, and transmit notice of that hearing and a copy of the proposed ordinance to Metro at least 30 days prior to the hearing. • 1. Metro shall prepare and mail a notice of the city or county hearing to each affected property owner. 2. The Metro notice shall include the date, time, location and the title and number of any local ordinance; an explanation of the general requirements —„ of Title 3, and an explanation of the implementation in the local ordinance, - if no code amendments are proposed to comply with Title 3. 3. Metro shall review any amendments to Title 3 proposed by cities and • counties based on the testimony of property owners." • Section 7. Section 2 of Title 8 at Metro Code Section 3.07.820 is hereby • amended to add a new subsection as follows: "G. On or before six months prior to the 18 month deadline established in Section 1 B, cities and counties shall transmit to Metro the following: 1. An evaluation of their local plans, including any relevant existing regulations and the amendments necessary to comply with Title 3 of this functional plan; • 2. Copies of all applicable comprehensive plans, maps and implementing ordinances as proposed to be amended; ORDINANCE 98-7300 - Page 5 • 4 - . 3. Findings that explain how the amended city and county comprehensive • plans, maps and implementing ordinances will achieve the standards required in Title 3 of this functional plan. In developing the evaluation,plan and ordinance amendments and findings,cities and counties shall address the Metro 2040 Growth Concept-and explain how the proposed amendments implement the Growth Concept." Section 8. In accordance with Title 8, Section 3 of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan, Ordinances No. 96-647C and No. 97-715B, Appendix-A, any amendment of city or county comprehensive plans or implementing ordinances shall be consistent.with Ordinances No.96-647C and No. 97-715B, Appendix A, Sections • 3.07.310 through 3.07.370 of the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan as amended after the date this ordinance becomes effective. Section 9. Cities and counties are hereby required to comply.with Title 3, Sections 1-4 of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan, as amended herein, within 18 months of the adoption of this ordinance. Section 10. Ordinances No. 96-647C and No. 97-715B, Appendix A, Section 3.07.1000 is hereby amended to add and replace definitions shown in Exhibit E which is attached and incorporated by reference into this ordinance. Section 11. The provisions of this ordinance are separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence,paragraph, section, subsection, or portion of this ordinance or the invalidity of the application thereof to any city, county, person or . circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance or its application to other cities, counties, persons or circumstances. • ADOPTED by the Metro Council this 184' day of 998. i fz Jo/ vis : .,Presiding Officer A - : • •p%• as to Form: / - • d. ` =PA - Li . - .rding Sec• tary .Daniel B. Coo• r, Gen- -:1 Counsel ORDINANCE 98-7300 Page 6 TITLE 3: WATER QUALITY,FLOOD MANAGEMENT AND FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION Section 1. Intent To protect the beneficial water uses and functions and values of resources within the Water Quality and Flood Management Areas by limiting or mitigating the impact on these areas from development activities,protecting life and property from dangers associated with flooding and working toward a regional coordination program of protection for Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas. Section 2. Applicability A. This Title applies to: 1. Development in Water Quality Resource and Flood Management Areas. 2. Development which may cause temporary or permanent erosion on any property within the Metro Boundary. 3. Development in Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas when Metro's Section 5 analysis and mapping are completed. B. This title does not apply to work necessary.to protect,repair, maintain, or replace existing structures,utility facilities, roadways,driveways, accessory uses and exterior improvements in response to emergencies provided that after the emergency has passed, adverse impacts are mitigated in accordance with the performance standards in Section 4. Section 3. Implementation Alternatives for Cities and Counties A. Cities and counties shall comply with this Title in one of the following ways: 1. Amend their comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances to adopt all or part of the Title 3 Model Ordinance or code language that substantially complies with the performance standards in Section 4 and the . intent of this Title,and adopt either the Metro Water Quality and Flood Management Area Map or a map which substantially complies with the Metro map. Cities and counties may choose one of the following options for applying this section: a. Adopt code language implementing this Title which prevails over the map and uses the map as reference; or EXHIBIT A Page • • b. Adopt a city or county field verified map of Water Quality and Flood Management Areas based on the Metro Water Quality and Flood Management map, updated according to Section 7, implementing this Title which prevails over adopted code language. • Field verification is a process of identifying or delineating Protected Water Features, Water Quality Resource Areas and Flood Management Areas shown on the Metro Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map. This process includes examination of information such as site visit reports, wetlands inventory maps, aerial photographs,and public input and review. The field verification process shall result in a locally adopted Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map which: 1. Applies the Title 10 definitions of Protected Water Feature, Water Quality Resource Areas and Flood Management Areas to all those protected areas on the Metro Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map to show the specific boundaries of those protected areas on the locally adopted Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map; and 2. Is subject to amendment by applying adopted code language to add Protected Water Features, Water Quality Resource Areas and Flood Management Areas and to correct errors in the local Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map as required by Section 7 and • consistent with Section 3.D. 2. Demonstrate that existing city and county comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances substantially comply with the performance standards in Section 4 and the intent of this Title. 3. Any combination oft. and 2.above that substantially complies with all performance standards in Section 4. B. Cities and counties shall hold at least one public hearing prior to adopting . • comprehensive plan amendments,ordinances and maps implementing the performance standards in Section 4 of this Title or demonstrating that existing city or county comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances substantially comply with Section 4, to add Protected Water Features, and wetlands which meet the criteria in Section 7.C., to their Water Quality and Flood Management Area EXHIBIT A Page 2 41110 • map. The proposed comprehensive plan amendments, implementing ordinances and maps shall be available for public review at least 45 days prior to the public hearing. C. Cities and counties shall conduct a review of their Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map concurrent with local periodic review required by ORS 197.633 (1997). D. Some areas which would otherwise be mapped as Protected Water Features, Water Quality Resource Areas and Flood Management Areas do not appear on the Metro Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map because streams had been culverted, wetlands had been filled or a fill permit had been approved, or the area was demonstrated to have existing conflicting water dependent uses, or existing plans or agreements for such uses,or the area was developed or - committed to other uses. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Title, cities and counties are not required to establish Protected Water Features, Water Quality Resource Areas and Flood Management Areas through adopted code provisions or mapping for areas which were examined but not included on the Water Quality and Flood • Management Areas map adopted by the Metro Council. Section 4. Performance Standards � a A. Flood Management Performance Standards. 1. The purpose of these standards is to reduce the risk of flooding, prevent or reduce risk to human life and property, and maintain functions and values of floodplains such as allowing for the storage and conveyance of stream • flows through existing and natural flood conveyance systems. 2. All development, excavation and fill in the Flood Management Areas shall conform to the following performance standards: a. Development,excavation and fill shall be performed in a manner to maintain or increase flood storage and conveyance capacity and not increase design flood elevations. b. All fill placed at or below the design flood elevation in Flood Management Areas shall be balanced with at least an equal amount of soil material removal. c. Excavation shall not be counted as compensating for fill if such areas will be filled with water in non-storm winter conditions. EXHIBIT A Page d. Minimum finished floor elevations for new habitable structures in the Flood Management Areas shall be at least one foot above the design flood elevation. e. Temporary fills permitted during construction shall be removed. f. Uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by DEQ in the Flood Management Area shall be prohibited. 3. The following uses and activities are not subject to the requirements of Subsection 2: • a. Excavation and fill necessary to plant new trees or vegetation. b. Excavation and fill required for the construction of detention facilities or structures, and other facilities such as levees specifically designed to reduce or mitigate flood impacts. Levees shall not be used to create vacant buildable lands. c. New culverts, stream crossings, and transportation projects may be permitted if designed as balanced cut and fill projects or designed to not significantly raise the design flood elevation. Such projects shall be designed to minimize the area of fill in Flood Management Areas and to minimize erosive velocities. Stream crossing shall be as close to perpendicular to the stream as practicable. Bridges shall be used instead of culverts wherever practicable. B. Water Quality Performance Standards 1. The purpose of these standards is to: 1)protect and improve water quality to support the designated beneficial water uses as defined in Title 10, and 2) protect the functions and values of the Water Quality Resource Area • which include, but are not limited to: a. providing a vegetated corridor to separate Protected Water Features from development; b. maintaining or reducing stream temperatures; c. maintaining natural stream corridors; d. minimizing erosion, nutrient and pollutant loading into water; e. filtering, infiltration and natural water purification; EXHIBIT A Page 4 • f. stabilizing slopes to prevent landslides"contributing to sedimentation of water features. 2. Local codes shall require all development in Water Quality Resource • Areas to conform to the following performance standards: a. The Water Quality Resource Area is the vegetated corridor and the Protected Water Feature. The width of the vegetated corridor is specified in the table below. At least three slope measurements along the water feature, at no more than 100-foot increments, shall be made for each property for which development is proposed. • Depending on the width of the property, the width of the vegetated corridor will vary. • •`` • EXHIDIT A Page 5 • • Table 1 Protected Water Slope Adjacent to Starting Point for - ,Width of Vegetated Feature Type Protected Water Measurements Corridor (see definitions) Feature from Water Feature Primary Protected <25% • Edge of bankful 50 feet Water Features' flow or 2-year storm level; • Delineated edge of Title 3 wetland • Primary Protected >25%for 150 feet • Edge of bankful 200 feet Water Features' or mores flow or 2-year - storm level; • Delineated edge of Title 3 wetland Primary Protected >25%for less than • Edge of bankful Distance from Water Features' 150 feet5 flow or 2-year starting point of storm level; measurement to top • Delineated edge of ravine(break in of Title 3 wetland >25% slope)', plus 50 feet.` Secondary < 25% • Edge of bankful 15 feet Protected Water flow or 2-year Features2 storm level; • Delineated edge of Title 3 wetland Secondary >25%' • Edge of bankful 50 feet Protected Water flow or 2-year Features2 storm level; • Delineated edge • • of Title 3 wetland t Primary Protected Water Features include:all perennial streams and streams draining greater than 100 acres,Title 3 wetlands,natural Woes and springs 2Secondary Protected Water Features include intermittent streams draining 50-100 acres. Where the Protected Water Feature is confined by a ravine or gully,the top of ravine is the break in the>25%slope(see slope measurement in Appendix). 4A maximum reduction of 25 feet may be permitted in the width of vegetated corridor beyond the slope break if a geotechnical report demonstrates that slope is stable.To establish the width of the vegetated corridor,slope should be measured in 25-foot increments away from the water feature until slope is less than 25%(top of ravine). 'Vegetated corridors in excess of 50-feet for primary protected features,or in excess of 15-feet for secondary protected features,apply on steep slopes only in the uphill direction from the protected water feature. EXHIBIT A Pugc 6 • • b. Water Quality Resource Areas shall be protected,maintained, enhanced or restored as specified in Section 4.B.2. c. Prohibit development that will have a significant negative impact on the functions and values of the Water Quality Resource Area, which cannot be mitigated in accordance with 2.f. d. Vegetative cover native to the Portland metropolitan region shall be maintained,enhanced or restored,if disturbed,in the Water Quality Resource Area. Invasive non-native vegetation may be removed from the Water Quality Resource Area and replaced with native cover. Only native vegetation shall be used to enhance or - restore the Water Quality Resource Area. This shall not preclude • construction of energy dissipaters at outfalls consistent with watershed enhancement, and as approved by local surface water management agencies. e. Uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by DEQ in the Water Quality Resource Area shall be prohibited. • f. Cities and counties may allow development in Water Quality Resource Areas provided that the governing body, or its designate, - implement procedures which: 1. Demonstrate that no practicable alternatives to the requested development exist which will not disturb the Water Quality Resource Area; and • 2. If there is no practicable alternative, limit the development • to reduce the impact associated with the proposed use; and 3. Where the development occurs, require mitigation to ensure. that the functions and values of the Water Quality Resource Area are restored. g. Cities and counties may allow development for repair, replacement or improvement of utility facilities so long as the Water Quality Resource Area is restored consistent with Section 4.B.2(d). h. The performance standards of Section 4.B.2 do not apply to routine repair and maintenance of existing structures, roadways, driveways, utilities, accessory uses and other development. EXHIBIT A Page 7 • • • 3. • For lots or parcels which are fully or predominantly within the Water Quality Resource Area and are demonstrated to be unbuildable by the vegetative corridor regulations, cities and counties shall reduce or remove vegetative corridor regulations to assure the lot or parcel will be-buildable while still providing the maximum vegetated corridor practicable. Cities and counties shall encourage landowners to voluntarily protect these areas through various means, such as conservation easements and incentive programs. C. Erosion and Sediment Control • 1. The purpose of this section is to require erosion prevention measures and sediment control practices during and after construction to prevent the discharge of sediments. 2. Erosion prevention techniques shall be designed to prevent visible and measurable erosion as defined in Title 10. 3. To the extent erosion cannot be completely prevented, sediment control measures shall be designed to capture, and retain on-site, soil particles that have become dislodged by.erosion. D. Implementation Tools to protect Water Quality and Flood Management Areas 1. Cities and counties shall either adopt land use regulations, which authorize transfer of permitted units and floor area to mitigate the effects of development restrictions in Water Quality and Flood Management Areas, or adopt other measures that mitigate the effects of development restrictions. • • 2: Metro encourages local governments to require that approvals of • applications for partitions, subdivisions and design review actions be conditioned upon one of the following: a. Protection of Water Quality and Flood Management Areas with a conservation easement; b. Platting Water Quality and Flood Management Areas as common open space; or c. Offer of sale or donation of property to public agencies or private non-profits for preservation where feasible. EXHIBIT A Page 8 • • 3. Additions, alterations,rehabilitation or replacement of existing structures, roadways, driveways, accessory uses and development in the Water Quality and Flood Management Area may be allowed provided that: a. The addition, alteration,rehabilitation or replacement is not inconsistent with applicable city and county regulations, and • b. The addition, alteration,rehabilitation or replacement does not encroach closer to the Protected Water Feature than the existing structures,roadways,driveways or accessory uses and development, and c. The addition, alteration,rehabilitation or replacement satisfies section 4.C. of this Title. d. In determining appropriate conditions of approval, the affected city or county shall require the applicant to: 1. Demonstrate that no reasonably practicable alternative design or method of development exists that would have a lesser impact on the Water Quality Resource Area than the ,. one proposed; and 2. If no such reasonably practicable alternative design or method of development exists, the project should be conditioned to limit its disturbance and impact on the 4 Water Quality Resource to the minimum extent necessary r to achieve the proposed addition, alteration, restoration, replacement or rehabilitation; and • 3. • Provide mitigation to ensure that impacts to the functions • and values of the Water Quality Resource Area will be mitigated or restored to the extent practicable. 4. Cities and counties may choose not to apply the Water Quality and Flood Management Area performance standards of Section 4 to development necessary for the placement of structures when it does not require a • grading or building permit. 5. Metro encourages cities and counties to provide for restoration and enhancement of degraded Water Quality Resource Areas through conditions of approval when development is proposed,or through incentives or other means. EXHIBIT A Page 9 • • lb 6. Cities and counties shall apply the performance standards of this Title to Title 3 Wetlands as shown on the Metro Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map and locally adopted Water Quality and Flood Management Areas maps. Cities and counties may also apply the performance standards of this Title to other wetlands. E. Map Administration Cities and counties shall amend their comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances to provide a process for each of the following: 1. Amendments to city and county adopted Water Quality and Flood • Management Area maps to correct the location of Protected Water Features, Water Quality Resource Areas and Flood Management Areas. Amendments shall be initiated within 90 days of the date the city or county receives information establishing a possible map error. 2. Modification of the Water Quality Resource Area upon demonstration that the modification will offer the same or better protection of water quality, the Water Quality and Flood Management Area and Protected Water Feature. 3. Amendments to city and county adopted Water Quality and Flood Management Area maps to add Title 3 wetlands when the city or county receives significant evidence that a wetland meets any one of the following criteria: a. The wetland is fed by surface flows, sheet flows or precipitation, and has evidence of flooding during the growing season, and has 60 percent or greater vegetated • cover, and is over one-half acre in size; or the wetland qualifies as having"intact water quality function"under the 1996 Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology;or b. The wetland is in the Flood Management Area, and has evidence of flooding during the growing season, and is five acres or more in size, and has a restricted outlet or no outlet; or the wetland qualifies as having "intact hydrologic control function" under the 1996 Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology; or EXHIBIT A Page 10 • • c. The wetland or a portion of the wetland is within a horizontal distance of less than one-fourth mile from a water body which meets the Department of Environmental Quality definition of"water quality limited water body"in OAR Chapter 340, Division 41 (1996). Examples of significant evidence that a wetland exists that may meet the criteria above are a wetland assessment conducted using the 1996 Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology, or correspondence from the Division of State Lands that a wetland determination or delineation has been submitted or completed for • property in the city or county. 4. Cities and counties are not required to apply the criteria in Section 4.E.3. to water quality or stormwater detention facilities. `` • • • EXHIBIT A Page I I • Proposed Method for Determinin g . • _ Vegetated Corridors Next to Primary Protected Water Features Figure 1 207 . so sr r How measure slope (Figure 1) • l• 1' " Measure 50 feet horizontally(L1)from the K2 stream (top of bank) and determine the slope • "' (H1/L1 -the difference in elevation divided • by the difference in horizontal distance multiplied by 100). • If the slope in this 50-foot area is less than Figure 2 25%, the corridor width is 50 feet from the slope 425% top of bank (see Figure 2). • ,��50'Buffer 50' . If the slope in the 50-foot area is 25% or • greater, measure another 25 feet • horizontally. If the slope in this incremental 25-foot area is now less than 25% (H2/L2 Figure 3 2s% <25%), the vegetated corridor width would tar Buffer �s+s'H' • be 100 feet (50 feet for the horizontal distance from the top of bank with slope . greater than 25% PLUS an additional 50 o s0 75* 10C/ feet). (See Figure 3.) • If the slope is greater than 25% in this incremental 25-foot area, continue End Pant measuring the slope every 25 feet (H/L) Figure 4 •25 1(4 25% until yod.either. 125'Boner i •ax! • (a) find a slope less than 25% i I • (see Figure 4), or 1 1 1 1 1 • 0 s0 may 125 (When you find a slope less than 25%, the vegetated corridor equals the distance from the stream's top of bank to the end point of the last surveyed 25-foot increment with a End Pow slope greater than 25% PLUS an additional Figure 5 2 lncre 1e"" 25x ,251, a/ 50 feet). 200 Buffer (b) reach 200 feet (the maximum corridor width). (See Figure 5.) 1 o SO ?sloe 1?5•tSa 7S-20a • • Advantages: • • • Provides protection for most steep slopes, yet corridor widths can be varied to fit a number of different situations (corridor • widths include 50 feet to 100 feet, 125 feet, 150 feet, 175 feet, and 200 feet) • Provides flexibility. • Disadvantages: •. Does not protect slopes that rise steeply after a gradual foodplain' area. ss • Section 5. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area A. The purpose of these standards is to conserve,protect,and enhance fish and wildlife habitat within the fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas to be identified on.the water quality and flood management area map by establishing performance standards and promoting coordination by Metro of regional urban water sheds. B. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area Recommendations These areas shall be shown on the Water Quality and Flood Management Area Map. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas generally include and/or go beyond the Water Quality and Flood Management Areas. These areas to be shown on the map arewill be Metro's initial-inventory of significant fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. Metro hereby recommends that local jurisdictions adopt the following temporary standards: 1. Prohibit development in the-Ffish and Wwildlife 6conservation Areas that,adversely impacts fish and wildlife habitat. Exceptions: It is recognized that urban development will, at times, necessitate development activities within or adjacent to Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. The following Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Mitigation Policy, except for emergency situations, applies to all the following exceptions: A project alternatives analysis,where public need for the project has been established,will be required for any of the exceptions listed below. The alternatives analysis must seek to avoid adverse environmental impacts by demonstrating there are no practicable, less environmentally damaging alternatives available. In those cases where there are no practicable, less environmentally damaging alternatives,the project proponent will seek alternatives which reduce or minimize adverse environmental impacts. Where impacts are unavoidable,compensation,by complete replacement of the impacted site's ecological attributes or,where appropriate, substitute resources of equal or greater value will be provided in accordance with the Metro Water Quality and Flood Management model ordinance. a. Utility construction within a maximum construction zone width established by cities and counties. b. Overhead or underground electric power, telecommunications and cable television lines within a sewer or storrnwater right-of-way or within a maximum construction zone width established by cities and counties. EXHIBIT 13 Puge I • • c. Trails, boardwalks and viewing areas construction. d. Transportation crossings and widenings. Transportation crossings and widenings shall be designed to minimize disturbance, allow for fish and wildlife passage and crossings should be preferably at right angles to the stream channel. 2. Limit the clearing or removal of native vegetation from the Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area to ensure its long term survival and health. Allow and encourage enhancement and restoration projects for the benefit of fish and wildlife. 3. Require the revegetation of disturbed areas with native plants to 90 percent cover within three years. Disturbed areas should be replanted with native plants on the Metro Plant List or an approved locally adopted plant list. Planting or propagation of plants listed on the Metro Prohibited Plant List within the Conservation Area shall be prohibited. 4. Require compliance with Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) seasonal restrictions for in-stream work. Limit development activities that would impair fish and wildlife during key life-cycle events according to the guidelines contained in ODFW's "Oregon Guidelines for Timing of In-water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources." C. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Protection Within eighteen (18) months from the effective date of this functional plan, Metro shall complete the following regional coordination program by adoption of functional plan provisions. 1. Metro shall establish criteria to define and identify regionally significant fish and wildlife habitat areas. • 2. Metro shall adopt a map of regionally significant fish and wildlife areas after(-l-a) examining existing Goal 5 data,reports and regulation from cities and counties, and( b holding public hearings. 3. Metro shall identify inadequate or inconsistent data and protection in existing Goal 5 data, reports and regulations on fish and wildlife habitat. City and county comprehensive plan provisions where inventories of significant resources were completed and accepted by a LCDC Periodic Review Order after January 1, 1993, shall not be required to comply until their next periodic review. EXHIBIT B Page 2 • 4. Metro shall complete Goal 5 economic, social, environmental and energy (ESEE) analyses for mapped regionally significant fish and wildlife habitat areas only for those areas where inadequate or inconsistent data or protection has been identified. 5. Metro shall establish performance standards for protection of regionally significant fish and wildlife habitat that must be met by the plans implementing ordinances of cities and counties. Section 6. Metro Model Ordinance Required Metro shall adopt a Water Quality and Flood Management Areas Model Ordinance and map. - _ _ . -. •..-. _ _ _ _ :_ - __ •_ . The Model Ordinance shall represent one method of complying with this Title. The Model Ordinance shall be advisory,and cities and counties are not required to adopt the Model Ordinance, or any, part thereof, to substantially comply with this Title. However,cities and counties which adopt the Model Ordinance in its entirety and a Water Quality and Flood Management . Areas Map shall be deemed to have substantially complied with the requirements of this Title. • Sections 1-4 of this Title shall not become effective until 2418 months after the Metro Council has adopted a Model Codethe Model Ordinance and inopWater Quality and Flood Management Areas Ma. - - z.. -- - - - - - • =. Section 5 of this Title shall be implemented by adoption of new functionalplan provisions. The Metro-Council may adopt a Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Model Ordinance and mMap for protection of regionally significant fish and wildlife habitat. - =- :. • = = - - : - - •- : - • • Section 7. Variances City and county comprehensive plans and implementing regulations are hereby required to include procedures to consider claims of map error and hardship variances to reduce or remove ctreameer or-Fish and Wildlife Habitat pProtection for any property demonstrated to be converted to an unbuildable lot by application of Fish and Wildlife Habitat Pprotection regulations. EXHIBIT B Puge 3 • • • Title 3 Model Ordinance • Growth Management Committee May 28, 1998 e. METRO • • • EXHIBIT C rage 1 • • • • Table of Contents Introduction 4 Section 1. Intent 7 Section 2. Applicability 8 . Section 3. Administration 8 Map as Reference 8 • Field Verified Map 9 Periodic Review 9 Section 4. Water Quality Resource Areas 10 Uses Permitted Outright 12 - Uses under Prescribed Conditions 12 Conditional Uses 12 Prohibited Uses 13 Application Requirements 13 Development Standards 15 Section 5. Flood Management 21 . . . Uses Permitted Outright 21 ..Conditional Uses 21 Prohibited Uses 22 . Development Standards 22 Section 6. Subdivision and Partitions 23 Section 7. Density Transfers 24 • Section 8. Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control 25 Section 9. Variances 26 Hardship Variance 27 Buildable Lot Variance 28 Variance Conditions 28 Section 10. Map Administration 29 Section 11. Consistency -31 Section 12. Warning and Disclaimer of Liability 31 . Section 13. Severability 31 Section 14. Enforcement 31 EXHIBIT Page 2 • • • Definitions 33 Tables: Table 1. Vegetated Corridor Widths 11 Table 2. Water Quality Resource Area Requirements 18 • Appendix • • • EXHIBIT C Page • EXHIBIT C Metro Water Quality and Flood Management Area Model Ordinance Introduction Attached is the model ordinance required by Title 3, Section 6 of Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. The purpose of this model ordinance is to provide a specific example of provisions approved by the Metro Council that can be used by a city or county to comply with the • performance standards for Title 3: Water Quality, Flood Management, and Fish and Wildlife Conservation described in the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. Title 3 describes specific performance standards and practices for floodplain and water quality protection. It also requires that Metro adopt a Water Quality and Flood Management Model Ordinance and map for use by local jurisdictions to comply with Title 3. This model ordinance fulfills the Title 3 requirement. It is also consistent with Metro's policies in the 1995 Future Vision Report, in the 1995 Regional Urban Growth Goals and Objectives (RUGGOs)in the 1.992 Greenspaces Master Plan, and in the 1997 Regional Framework Plan. The purpose of Title 3 is to protect water quality and floodplain areas. Floodplains protect the region's health and public safety by reducing flood and landslide hazards and pollution of the region's waterways. This Model Ordinance and Map address that purpose. Another purpose of Title 3 is to protect fish and wildlife habitat. Statewide land use Goal 5 measures, which include fish and wildlife habitat protection, will be addressed in a Metro study that will be conducted within the next 18 months. Title 3 will apply to development in Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas when Metro's Section 5 analysis and mapping are completed. As additional issues are addressed, further regulations may be imposed on areas contained within or outside of the Water Quality Resource Area and Flood Management Area Overlay Zones addressed in this Model Ordinance. The Metro Future Vision, Greenspaces Master Plan, Regional Urban Growth Goals and Objectives(RUGGOs),and Regional Framework Plan identify water.quality protection, floodplain management, fish and wildlife habitat protection, development of recreational trails, acquisition of open space and maintenance of biodiversity as critical elements of maintaining healthy, livable communities. This Model Ordinance, however,only provides specific examples of local ordinance provisions for a portion of the issues identified in Title 3:protection of the region's floodplains, water quality and reduction of flood hazards and the implementation of erosion control practices throughout the Portland metropolitan region. Other issues EXHIBIT C Page 4 • • including fish and wildlife habitat,watershed-wide stormwater management, steep slopes, landslide hazards and biodiversity are addressed in the December 1997 Metro Regional Framework Plan. The approach in Sections 2,3 and 4 of Title 3 is to implement.Oregon Statewide Goal 6 and Goal 7. Goal 6:Air, Water and Land Resources Quality and Goal 7:Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards are addressed by protecting streams,rivers,wetlands, and areas adjacent to streams and floodplains within the Water Quality Resource and Flood Management Areas. Cities and counties are required to amend their plans and implementing ordinances, if . . necessary,to ensure that they comply with Title 3 in one of the following ways: Adopt the applicable provisions of the Metro Water Quality and Flood Management Area model ordinance and map, which is entitled the Metro Water Quality and Flood Management Area Map. Local jurisdictions have two options with regard to their adoption of code language and a map(either the Metro Water Quality and Flood Management Area Map or a city or county :. field verified map that substantially complies with the Metro map): The code language that describes the affected area prevails and the map is a reference; or the field verified map prevails and the descriptive code language is used to correct map errors when they are discovered and for delineating and marking the overlay zone boundary in the field. This map must be reviewed concurrently with local periodic review. • The advantage-of the first approach above is that the final boundary is determined at the time of the development application, based on a detailed survey of the site. If a large scale, precise boundary can be mapped,the official map should prevail. This method allows for a more efficient permit process and more certainty for the property owner. In this case, the language is used to correct mapping errors when they are discovered. A map, however, should only be used if it has a level of detail and clarity equal to or better than I"= 300 feet, and has been field-checked for accuracy. Adopt plans and implementing ordinances and maps that substantially comply with the performance standards of Title 3. Any combination of the above that substantially complies with all performance standards in Title 3, Section 4(see Title 3,Section 3). The purpose of the map adopted by Metro is to provide the performance standard for the location of Water Quality Resource and Flood Management Areas. Therefore, the map is the basis for evaluation of substantial compliance of local maps for those jurisdictions that choose to develop their own field verified map of Water Quality Resource and Flood Management Areas. "Substantial compliance" means that the city and county EXHIBIT C Page 5 • • comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances,on the whole, conform with the purposes of the performance standards in the functional plan and any failure to meet -individual performance standard requirements is technical or minor in nature. • EXHIBIT C Page 6 • • Water Quality and Flood Management Area Model Ordinance Section 1. Intent The purpose of this ordinance is to comply with Sections 1-4 of Title 3 of Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. A. To protect and improve water quality, to support the designated beneficial water uses and to protect the functions and values of existing and newly established Water Quality Resource Areas, which include,but are not limited to: 1. Provide a vegetated corridor to separate Protected Water Features from • development; 2. Maintain or reduce stream temperatures; 3. Maintain natural stream corridors; 4. Minimize erosion, nutrient and pollutant loading into water; 5. Provide filtration, infiltration and natural water purification; 6. Stabilize slopes to prevent landslides contributing to sedimentation of water features. B. To protect Flood Management Areas, which provide the following functions: 1. Protect life and property from dangers associated with flooding; 2. Flood storage, reduction of flood velocities, reduction of flood peak flows and reduction of wind and wave impacts; 3. Maintain water quality by reducing and sorting sediment loads, processing chemical and organic wastes and reducing nutrients; 4. Recharge, store and discharge groundwater; 5. Provide plant and animal habitat, and support riparian ecosystems. C. To establish two overlay zones for Water Quality Resource Areas and Flood Management-Areas,which operate contemporaneously with the base zone and implement the performance standards of Title 3 of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. EXHIBIT C Poge 7 • • • Section 2. Applicability A. This ordinance applies to: 1. Development in the Water Quality Resource Area and Flood Management Area Overlay Zones. The overlay zones restrict the uses that are allowed in the base zone by right, with limitations,or as conditional uses. 2. Development that may cause visible or measurable erosion on any property within the Metro Boundary. B. This ordinance does not apply to work necessary to protect,repair, maintain, or • replace existing structures,utility facilities,roadways, driveways, accessory uses and exterior improvements in response to emergencies provided that after the emergency has passed, adverse impacts are mitigated in accordance with Table 2 standards for restoring marginal existing vegetated corridors. Section 3. Administration A. Title 3 of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan allows for two methods for applying the provisions of this ordinance to applications to allow development in the Water Quality Resource Areas and Flood Management Areas Overlay Zones. The purpose of this section is to show how this ordinance is applied under each method. Alternative 1 requires the text of this ordinance, including definitions, to describe and regulate the protected areas shown on the city/county Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map using the map as a reference. _ Alternative 2 requires the city/county Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map to describe and regulate the areas shown on the map after the city or county •has field verified the protected areas on Metro's map and identified or delineated those areas, and other Protected Water Features, Water Quality Resource Areas and Flood Management Areas the city/county may identify,on the city/county map. B. Map as Reference (Alternative 1) 1. The text provisions of this ordinance shall be used to determine whether applications to allow development in the Water Quality Resource Area and Flood Management Area Overlay Zones are subject to the requirements of this ordinance. 2. The Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map shall be a reference for identifying areas subject to the Water Quality Resource Area or Flood Management Area Overlay Zones. EXHIBIT C Pup • • 3. Applicants are required to provide the city/county with a delineation of the - Water Quality Resource Areas and Flood Management Areas on the subject property as part of their application. An application shall not be complete until this delineation is submitted to the city/county. 4. Wetlands which meet the criteria in Section 10.D.2 shall be subject to the standards which apply to the Water Quality Resource Areas and Flood Management Areas Overlay Zones. C. Field Verified Map(Alternative 2) 1. A field verified Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map shall be - used to determine whether applications to allow development in the Water Quality Resource Areas and Flood Management Areas Overlay Zones are subject to the requirements of this ordinance. 2. The city/county shall identify and delineate the areas shown on the Metro Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map by: a. Conducting a site visit, with the owner's permission,of the property where a Water Quality Resource Area or Flood Management Area is shown on Metro's map to delineate the resource area; and b. Gathering and reviewing other information such as wetland inventory maps, aerial photographs and other significant evidence submitted by citizens; and c. Mapping the specific boundaries of the Water Quality Resource Areas and Flood Management Areas on the city/county Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map. 3. The city/county Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map shall be amended to add wetlands which meet the requirements of Section 10.D.2 and to correct the locations of Protected Water Features, Water Quality Resource Areas and Flood Management Areas in accordance with Section 10.B. D. The city/county shall review the Water Quality and Flood Management Areas Map during periodic review as required by ORS 197.633 (1997). EXHIBIT C Page 9 • • Section 4. Water Quality Resource Areas - A. The purpose of this section is to protect and improve the beneficial-water uses and functions and values of Water Quality Resource Areas. B. This ordinance establishes a Water Quality Resource Area Overlay-Zone,which is delineated on the Water Quality and Flood Management Area map attached and incorporated by reference as part of this ordinance. (Note:If it has been determined during local public review that the code language is to prevail,adoption of these standards as written is appropriate. If a map is to . prevail, this section should be used for map correction and interpretation, and the • definition of areas should be by adopting an official map by reference.) C. The Water Quality Resource Area is the vegetated corridor and the Protected Water Feature. The width of the vegetated corridor is specified in the Table One. At least three slope measurements along the water feature, at no more than 100-foot increments, shall be made for each property for which development is proposed. . - Depending on the width of the property, the width of the vegetated corridor will vary. • • EXHIBIT C Page Ill • • • • • Table 1 • Protected Water Slope Adjacent to Starting Point for Width of Vegetated Feature Type Protected Water Measurements from Corridor (see definitions) Feature Water Feature Primary Protected <25% • Edge of bankful 50 feet Water Features1 flow or 2-year storm level; • Delineated edge • of Title 3 wetland Primary Protected >25%for 150 feet or • Edge of bankful .200 feet Water Features1 mores flow or 2-year storm level; • Delineated edge of Title 3 wetland Primary Protected >25%for less than • Edge of bankful Distance from starting Water Features1 150 feet5 flow or 2-year storm point of measurement level; to top of ravine(break • Delineated edge in>25%slope)3, plus of Title 3 wetland 50 feet 4 • Secondary Protected <25% • Edge of bankful 15 feet Water Features2 flow or 2-year storm level; • Delineated edge of Title 3 wetland Secondary Protected >25%5 • Edge of bankful 50 feet Water Features2 flow or 2-year E.torm level; • Delineated edge of Title 3 wetland (Primary Protected Water Features include:all perennial streams and streams draining greater '" than.100 acres,Title 3 wetlands,natural lakes and springs • • 2Secondary Protected Water Features include intermittent streams draining 50-100 acres. 3Where the Protected Water Feature is confined by a ravine or gully,the top of ravine is the break in the>25%slope(see slope measurement in Appendix). 4A maximum reduction of 25 feet may be permitted in the width of vegetated corridor beyond the slope break if a geotechnical report demonstrates that slope is stable.To establish the width of the vegetated corridor,slope should be measured in 25-foot increments sway from the water feature until slope is less than 25%(top of ravine). • SVegetated corridors in excess of 50-feet for primary protected features,or in excess of 15-feet for secondary protected features,apply on steep slopes only in the uphill direction from the protected water feature. (Note:- Thefollowing methodology is an alternative for the purposes ofsubstantial compliance:a jurisdiction can meet the performance standards in Title 3 by applying the following method to the water quality resource area:for areas with zero slope(as measured parallel to the ground) the buffer will be 50 feet from top of waterway bank, but for every one percent(1%)slope after that point, add six(6)feet.) • EXHIBIT C Page I I • • D. Uses Permitted Outright 1. Stream, wetland, riparian and upland enhancement or restoration projects; and farming practices as defined in ORS 30.930 and farm uses, excluding buildings and structures,as defined in ORS 215.203. 2. Placement of structures that do not require a grading or building permit. (Note: City and Counties have the option of choosing to apply the Water Quality and Flood Management Area performance standards of Table 1 to all structures.) 3. Routine repair and maintenance of existing structures,roadways,driveways, utility facilities, accessory uses and other development. (Note:Local jurisdictions may choose to place this subsection—D3— in subsection E as item 3, Uses under Prescribed Conditions, and prescribe those conditions.) E. Uses Under Prescribed Conditions 1. Repair, replacement or improvement of utility facilities where: a. The disturbed portion of the Water Quality Resource Area is restored; and b. Non-native vegetation is removed from the Water Quality Resource Area and replaced with vegetation from the Metro Native Plant List. 2. Additions, alterations, rehabilitation, or replacement of existing structures • that do not increase existing structural footprint in the Water Quality Resource Area where the disturbed portion of the Water Quality Resource Area is restored using native vegetative cover. F. Conditional Uses The following uses are allowed in the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone subject to compliance with the Application Requirements and Development Standards of subsections H and I: 1. - Any use allowed in the base zone, other than those listed in subsection D and E above. 2. Measures to remove or abate nuisances;or any other violation of State statute, administrative agency rule or city or county ordinance. EXHIBIT Page 12 • • 3. Roads to provide access to Protected Water Features or necessary ingress and egress across Water Quality Resource Areas. 4. New public or private utility facility construction. 5. Walkways and bike paths. (Subsection I.5). 6. New stormwater pre-treatment facilities(Subsection I.6). 7.- Widening an existing road adjacent to or running parallel to a Water Quality Resource Area. 8. Additions, alterations, rehabilitation or replacement of existing structures, roadways, accessory uses and development that increase the structural footprint within the Water Quality Resource Area consistent with Subsection I.7. G. Prohibited Uses 1. Any new structures, development, other than those listed in subsection D, E and F,construction activities; gardens, lawns, dumping of any materials of any kind. 2. Uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by the Department of Environmental Quality. • H. Application Requirements Applications for Conditional Uses in the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone must provide the following information in addition to the information required for the base zone: 1. A topographic map of the site at contour intervals of five feet or less showing a delineation of the Water Quality Resource Area,which includes areas shown on the city/county Water Quality and Flood Management Area map, and that meets the definition of Water.Quality Resource Areas in Table 1.. 2. The location of all existing natural features including,but not limit to, all trees of a caliper greater than six (6) inches diameter at breast height (DBH), natural drainages on the site, springs, seeps and outcroppings of rocks, or boulders within the Water Quality Resource Area. 3. Location of Title 3 wetlands. Where Title 3 wetlands are identified, the applicant shall follow the Division of State Lands recommended wetlands EXHIBIT C Puge 13 • • delineation process. The delineation shall be prepared by a professional wetlands specialist. 4. An inventory and location of existing debris and noxious materials. 5. An assessment of the existing condition of the Water Quality Resource Area in accordance with Table 2. 6. An inventory of vegetation, including percentage ground and canopy coverage. 7. Alternatives analysis demonstrating that: a. No practicable alternatives to the requested development exist that will not disturb the Water Quality Resource Area; and b. Development in the Water Quality Resource Area has been limited to the area necessary to allow for the proposed use; and • c. The Water Quality Resource Area can be restored to an equal or - better condition in accordance with Table 2; and d. It will bf: consistent with a Water Quality Resource Area Mitigation Plan. e. An explanation of the rationale behind choosing the alternative selected, including how adverse impacts to resource areas will be avoided and/or minimized. f. For applications seeking an alteration, addition, rehabilitation or • replacement of existing structures: 1. Demonstrate that no reasonably practicable alternative • design or method of development exists that would have a lesser impact on the Water Quality Resource Area than the one proposed; and 2. If no such reasonably practicable alternative design or method of development exists,the project should be conditioned to limit its disturbance and impact on the Water Quality Resource to the minimum extent necessary to achieve the proposed addition,alteration, restoration, replacement or rehabilitation; and EXHIBIT C Page 14 • 3. Provide mitigation to ensure that impacts to the functions and values of the Water Quality Resource Area will be • mitigated or restored to the extent.practicable. • 8. A Water Quality Resource Area Mitigation Plan shall contain the following information: a. A description of adverse impacts that will be caused as a result of development. b. An explanation of how adverse impacts to resource areas will be avoided,minimized,and/or mitigated in accordance with,but not limited to,Table 2. c. A list of all responsible parties including,but not limited to, the owner, applicant, contractor or other persons responsible for work on the development site. d. A map showing where the specific mitigation activities will occur. e. An implementation schedule, including timeline for construction, mitigation, mitigation maintenance, monitoring, reporting and a contingency plan. All in-stream work in fish-bearing streams shall be done in accordance with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife in-stream timing schedule. I. Development Standards Applications forConditional Uses in the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone shall satisfx_the following standards: 1. The Water Quality Resource Area shall be restored and maintained in accordance with the mitigation plan and the specifications in Table 2. 2. To the extent practicable,existing vegetation shall be protected and left in place. Work areas shall be carefully located and marked to reduce potential damage to the Water Quality Resource Area.- Trees in the Water Quality Resource Area shall not be used as anchors for stabilizing construction . equipment. 3. Where existing vegetation has been removed,or the original land contours disturbed, the site shall be revegetated, and the vegetation shall be established as soon as practicable. Nuisance plants,as identified in the Metro Native Plant List, may be removed at any time. Interim erosion control measures such as mulching shall be used to avoid erosion on bare, EXHIBIT Puge 15 areas. Nuisance plants shall be replaced with non-nuisance plants by the next growing season. 4. Prior to construction,the Water Quality Resource Area.shall be flagged, fenced or otherwise marked and shall remain undisturbed except as allowed in Subsection F. Such markings shall be maintained until construction is complete. 5. Walkways and bike paths: a. A gravel walkway or bike path shall not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the Protected Water Feature. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation. Where practicable, a maximum of 10 percent of the trail may be within 30 feet of the Protected Water Feature. b. -A paved walkway or bike path shall not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the Protected Water Feature. For any paved walkway or bike path, the width of the Water Quality Resource Area must be increased by a distance equal to the width of the path. Walkways and bike paths shall be constructed so as to minimize disturbance to existing vegetation. Where practicable, a maximum of 10 percent of the trail may be within 30 feet of the Protected Water Feature; and c. A walkway or bike path shall not exceed 10 feet in width. 6. Stormwater pre-treatment facilities: a. The stormwater pre-treatment facility may only encroach a maximum of 25 feet into the outside boundary of the Water Quality Resource Area of a primary water feature; and b. The area of encroachment must be replaced by adding an equal area to the Water Quality Resource Area on the subject property. 7. Additions, alterations, rehabilitation and replacement of lawful structures. a. For existing structures, roadways,driveways, accessory uses and development which are nonconforming, this ordinance shall apply in addition to the nonconforming use regulations of the city/county zoning ordinance. EXHIBIT C Page 16 • b. Additions, alterations,rehabilitation or replacement of existing structures,roadways,driveways, accessory uses and development shall not encroach closer to the Protected Water Feature than the existing structures,roadways,driveways, accessory uses and development 8. Off-site Mitigation: a. Where the alternatives analysis demonstrates that there are no . practicable alternatives for mitigation on site,off-site mitigation shall be located as follows: 1. As close to the development as is practicable above the confluence of the next downstream tributary, or if this is not practicable; 2. Within the watershed where the development will take place or as otherwise specified by the city or county in an approved Wetland Mitigation Bank. b. In order to ensure that the mitigation area will be protected in perpetuity, proof that a deed restriction has been placed on the property where the mitigation is to occur is required. • EXHIBIT C Page 17 • • Table 2 • WATER QUALITY RESOURCE AREA REQUIREMENTS EXISTING CONDITION OF REQUIREMENTS IF WATER REQUIREMENTS IF WATER WATER QUALITY QUALITY RESOURCE AREA QUALITY RESOURCE AREA RESOURCE AREA REMAINS UNDISTURBED IS DISTURBED DURING DURING CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION Good Existing Corridor. Combination of trees,shrubs Provide certification by Prior to construction,a biologist - and groundcover are 80% registered professional or landscape architect shall present,and there is more than -engineer, landscape architect, prepare and submit an inventory 50%tree canopy coverage in or biologist or other person of vegetation in areas proposed " the vegetated corridor. trained or certified in riparian to be disturbed and a plan for or wetland delineation that mitigating water quality impacts vegetated corridor meets the related to the development, standards of this ordinance. including: sediments,temperature and Inventory and remove debris nutrients and noxious materials. sediment control temperature control or addressing any other condition that may have caused the Protected Water Feature to be listed on DEQ's 303 (d)list. Inventory and remove debris and noxious materials. Note: The middle column, being italicized, indicates that it is an option for consideration • • • in the development review process. • EXHIBIT C Page I • • EXISTING CONDITION OF REQUIREMENTS IF WATER REQUIREMENTS IF WATER WATER QUALITY QUALITY RESOURCE AREA QUALITY RESOURCE AREA RESOURCE AREA REMAINS UNDISTURBED IS DISTURBED DURING DURING CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION Marginal Existing Vegetated Corridor. Combination of trees,shrubs Provide certification by Vegetate disturbed and bare and groundcover are 80% registered professional areas with,non-nuisance present,and 25-50 percent engineer. landscape architect, plantings from Native Plants _ - canopy coverage in the or biologist or other person List vegetated corridor. trained or certified in riparian or wetland delineation that Inventory and remove debris vegetated corridor meets the and noxious materials. standards of this ordinance. Revegetate with native species using a City/County approved Inventory and remove debris plan developed to represent the and noxious materials. vegetative composition that • would naturally occur on the site. Seeding may be required prior to establishing plants for site stabilization. Revegetation must occur during the next planting season following site disturbance. Annual replacement of plants that do not survive is required until vegetation representative of natural conditions is established on the site. • • • Restore and mitigate according to approved plan using non-nuisance plantings from Native Plants List. Inventory and remove debris and noxious materials. Note: The middle column,being italicized, indicates that it is an option for consideration ' in the development review process. • • EXHIBIT C Page 19 • • EXISTING CONDITION OF REQUIREMENTS IF WATER REQUIREMENTS IF WATER WATER QUALITY QUALITY RESOURCE AREA QUALITY RESOURCE AREA RESOURCE AREA REMAINS UNDISTURBED IS DISTURBED DURING DURING CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION Degraded Existing Vegetated Corridor: Less vegetation and canopy Vegetate bare areas with Vegetate disturbed and bare coverage than Marginal plantings from approved Native areas with appropriate plants Vegetated Corridors,and/or Plant List. from Native Plants List. greater than 10%surface coverage of any non-native Remove non-native species and Remove non-native species ands: species. revegetate with plantings from revegetate with non-nuisance approved Native Plants List. plantings from Native Plants List. Inventory and remove debris and noxious materials. Plant and seed to provide 100 percent surface coverage. Restore and mitigate according to approved plan using non- nuisance plantings from Native Plants List. Inventory and remove debris • and noxious materials. Note: The middle column,being italicized, indicates that it is an option for consideration in the development review process. • • • EXHIBIT C Page 20 • Alk Section 5. Flood Management A. The purpose of these standards is to reduce the risk of flooding,prevent or reduce risk to human life and property; and maintain the functions and values of floodplains,such as allowing for the storage and conveyance of stream flows through existing and natural flood conveyance systems. B. This ordinance establishes a Flood Management Area Overlay Zone, which is delineated on the Water Quality and Flood Management Area Map attached and incorporated by reference as a part of this ordinance. • C. The Flood Management Areas mapped include: 1. Land contained within the 100-year floodplain, flood area and floodway as shown on the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance • maps and the area of inundation for the February 1996 flood; and 2. Lands that have physical or documented evidence of flooding within recorded history. Jurisdictions shall use the most recent and technically accurate information available to determine the historical flood area, such as the aerial photographs of the 1996 flooding and digitized flood elevation maps. 3. The standards that apply to the Flood Management Areas apply in addition to local, state or federal restrictions governing floodplains or flood hazard areas. .D. Uses Permitted Outright: • • ,, . 1. Excavation and fill required to plant any new trees or vegetation. 2. Restoration or enhancement of floodplains, riparian areas, wetland, upland • and streams that meet federal and state standards. E. Conditional Uses: All uses allowed in the base zone or existing flood hazard overlay zone are allowed • in the Flood Management Overlay Zone subject to compliance with the Development Standards of subsection H. • EXHIBIT C Page 21 F. Prohibited Uses: 1. Any use prohibited in the base zone or existing flood hazard overlay zone. 2. Uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by the Department of Environmental Quality. G. Development Standards All development, excavation and fill in the floodplain shall conform to the following balanced cut and fill standards: • 1. No net fill in any floodplain is allowed. All fill placed in a floodplain shall be balanced with at least an equal amount of soil material removal. 2. Excavation areas shall not exceed fill areas by more than 50 percent of the square footage. 3. Any excavation below bankful stage shall not count toward compensating for fill. (Note: These areas would be full of water in the winter and not available to hold stormwater.) 4. Excavation to balance a fill shall be located on the same parcel as the fill unless it is not reasonable or practicable to do so. In such cases, the excavation shall be located in the same drainage basin and as close as possible to the fill site, so long as the proposed excavation and fill will not increase flood impacts for surrounding properties as determined through • hydrologic and hydraulic analysis. • 5. For excavated areas identified by the city or county to remain dry in the summer, such as parks or mowed areas, the lowest elevation of the excavated area shall be at least 6 inches above the winter"low water" elevation, and sloped at a minimum of two percent towards the Protected Water Feature. One percent slopes will be allowed in smaller areas. 6. For excavated areas identified by the city or county to remain wet in the summer, such as a constructed wetland, the grade shall be designed not to drain into the Protected Water Feature. 7. Minimum finished floor elevations must be at least one foot above the design flood height or highest flood of record, whichever is higher, for new habitable structures in the Flood Area. EXHIDIT C Page 22 • • 8. Short-term parking in the floodplain may be located at an elevation of no more than one foot below the ten-year floodplain so long as the parking facilities do not occur in a Water Quality Resource Area. Long-term parking in the floodplain may be located at an elevation of no more than one foot below the 100-year floodplain so long as the parking facilities do not occur in a Water Quality Resource Area. 9. Temporary fills permitted during construction shall be removed. 10. New culverts, stream crossings and transportation projects shall be designed:- as balanced cut and fill projects or designed not to significantly raise the . design flood elevation. Such projects shall be designed to minimize the area of fill in Flood Management Areas and to minimize erosive velocities Stream crossings shall be as close to perpendicular to the stream as practicable. Bridges shall be used instead of culverts wherever practicable. 11. Excavation and fill required for the construction of detention facilities or structures, and other facilities, such as levees, specifically shall be designed . to reduce or mitigate flood impacts and improve water quality. Levees shall not be used to create vacant buildable lands. Section 6. Subdivisions and Partitions (optional) A. The purpose of this section is to amend the city/county regulations governing land divisions to require that new subdivision and partition plats delineate and show the Water Quality Resource Area as a separate tract. B. The standards for land divisions in Water Quality Resource Areas Overlay Zone shall apply in addition to the requirements of the city/county land division . ordinance and zoning ordinance. • C. Prior to preliminary plat approval, the Water Quality Resource Area shall be shown as a separate tract,which shall not be a part of any parcel used for construction of a dwelling unit. D. Prior to final plat approval,ownership of the Water Quality Resource Area tract • shall be identified to distinguish it from lots intended for sale. The tract may be identified as any one of the following: 1. Private open space held by the owner or homeowners association; or 2. For residential land divisions, private open space subject to an easement conveying storm and surface water management rights to the city/county and preventing the owner of the tract from activities and uses inconsistent with the purpose of this ordinance; or • EXHIBIT C • Page 23 4. • 3. At the owner's option,public open space where the tract has been dedicated - to the city/county or other governmental unit; or 4. Any other ownership proposed by the owner and approved by the Director. E. Where the.Water Quality Resource Area tract is dedicated to the city/county or other governmental unit, development shall be subject to a minimum 3-foot setback from the Water Quality Resource Area. Section 7. Density Transfers A. The purpose of this section is to allow density accruing to portions of a property within the Water Quality Resource Area and Flood Management Area Overlay Zones to be transferred outside the overlay zones. B. Development applications that request a density transfer must provide the following information: 1. A map showing the net buildable area to which the density will be transferred. • 2. Calculations justifying the requested density increase. C. Density transfers shall be allowed if the applicant demonstrE.tes compliance with the following standards: 1. The density proposed for the lot receiving the density is not increased to more than two (2) times the permitted density of the base zone. Fractional units shall be rounded down to the next whole number. (Note: This is one way of restricting density.) 2. Minimum density standards will not increase due to the density transfers. D. The area of land contained in a Water Quality Resource Area may be excluded from the calculations for determining compliance with minimum density requirements of the,zoning code. E. All standards of the base zone other than density requirements continue to apply. F. Density transfers shall be recorded on the title of the lot in the Water Quality Resource Area and on the title of the transfer lot. EXHIBIT C Page 24 • • G. Once density is transferred from a lot in the Water Quality Resource Area, the density increase allocated to the transfer lot may not be transferred to any other lot. Section 8. Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control A. The purpose of this section is to require erosion prevention measures.and sediment .-. control practices for all development inside and outside the Water Quality Resource Area and Flood Management Area Overlay Zones during construction to prevent _ .. and restrict the discharge of sediments, and to require final permanent erosion prevention measures,which may include.landscaping,after development is . completed. Erosion prevention techniques shall be designed to protect soil particles from the force of water and wind so that they will not be transported from the site. - Sediment control measures shall be designed to capture soil particles after they have become dislodged by erosion and attempt to retain the soil particles on site. B. Prior to, or contemporaneous with, approval of an application that may cause visible or measurable erosion, the applicant must obtain an Erosion and Sediment Control Permit. C. An application for an Erosion and Sediment Control Permit shall include an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, which contains methods and interim measures to be used during and following construction to prevent or control erosion. The. plan shall demonstrate the following: 1. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan meets the requirements of the Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans, Technical Guidance Handbook(Handbook) attached and incorporated by reference as part of this ordinance; 2. The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan will: a. Prevent erosion by employing prevention practices such as non- disturbance,construction schedules, erosion blankets and mulch covers; or • b. Ensure that where erosion cannot be completely avoided,the sediment control measures will be adequate to prevent erosion from entering the public stormwater system, surface water system, and Water Quality Resource Areas; and c. Allow no more than a ten percent cumulative increase in natural stream turbidities, as measured relative to a control point immediately upstream of the turbidity causing activity. However, limited duration activities necessary to address an emergency or to accommodate essential dredging,construction or other legitimate EXHIBIT C Page 25 • • • • • activities, and that cause the standard to be exceeded may be authorized provided all practicable turbidity control techniques have been applied. 3. The applicant will actively manage and maintain erosion control measures and utilize techniques described in the Permit to prevent or control erosion during and following development. Erosion•and sediment control measures • required by the Permit shall remain in place until disturbed soil areas are permanently stabilized by landscaping, grass,approved mulch or other permanent soil stabilizing measures; 4. No mud,dirt,rock or other debris will be deposited upon a public street or - any part of the public stormwater system, surface water system, Water Quality Resource Area,or any part of a private stormwater system or surface water system that drains or connects to the public stormwater or surface water system. . D. . The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall be reviewed in conjunction with the _ requested development approval. If the development does not require review under Sections 3 and 4 of this ordinance, the Director may approve or deny the permit with notice of the decision to the applicant. E. The city or county may inspect the development site to determine compliance with the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Permit. F. Erosion that occurs on a development site that does not have an Erosion and Sediment Control Permit,or that results from a failure to comply with the terms of such a Permit, constitutes a violation of this ordinance. G.• - If the Director finds that the facilities and techniques approved in an Erosion and • • Sediment Control-Plan and Permit are not sufficient to prevent erosion, the Director shall notify the permittee. Upon receiving notice, the permittee shall immediately install interim erosion and sediment control measures as specified in the Handbook. Within three days from the date of notice,the permittee shall submit a revised Erosion and Sediment Control Plan to the city or county. Upon approval of the revised plan and issuance of an amended Permit,the permittee shall immediately implement the revised plan. Section 9. Variances A. The purpose of this Section is to ensure that compliance with this ordinance does not cause unreasonable hardship. To avoid such instances, the requirements of this ordinance may be varied. Variances are also allowed when strict application of this ordinance would deprive an owner of all economically viable use of land. EXHIBIT C Page 26 • B. This Section applies in addition to the standards governing proposals to vary the requirements of the base zone. C. The Director shall provide the following notice of variance applications: 1. Upon receiving an application to vary the requirements of this ordinance, the Director shall provide notice of the request to all property owners within (100)feet inside the urban growth boundary, (250) feet outside the urban growth boundary and Metro. 2. Within(7)days of a decision on the variance, the Director shall provide notice of the decision to all property owners within (100)feet inside the . urban growth boundary, (250) feet outside the urban growth boundary and Metro. D. Development may occur on lots located completely within the Water Quality Resource Overlay Zone that are recorded with the county assessor's office on or before the date this ordinance is adopted. Development shall not disturb more.than _._.. 5,000 square feet of the vegetated corridor, including access roads and driveways, subject to the erosion and sediment control standards of this ordinance. E. Hardship Variance Variances to avoid unreasonable hardship caused by the strict application of this ordinance are permitted subject to the criteria set forth in this section. To vary from the requirements of this ordiinance, the applicant must demonstrate the following: 1. The variance is the minimum necessary to allow the proposed use or activity; • 2. The variance does not increase danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion; 3. The impact of the increase in flood hazard,which will result from the variance,will not prevent the city or county from meeting the requirements of this ordinance. In support of this criteria the applicant shall have a qualified professional engineer document the expected height, velocity and duration of flood waters, and estimate the rate of increase in sediment transport of the flood waters expected both downstream and upstream as a result of the variance; 4. The variance will not increase the cost of providing and maintaining public services during and after flood conditions so as to unduly burden public agencies and taxpayers; EXHIBIT C Page 27 • - • 5. Unless the proposed variance is from Section 4.H.8 (mitigation)or Section 8 (erosion control), the proposed use will comply with those standards; and 6. The proposed use complies with the standards of the base zone. F. Buildable Lot Variance A variance to avoid the loss of all economically viable use of a lot that is partially inside the Water Quality Resource Overlay Zone is permitted. Development on such lots shall not disturb more than 5,000 square feet of the vegetated corridor, • including access roads and driveways, subject to the erosion and sediment control standards in Section 8 of this ordinance. Applicants must demonstrate the following: 1. Without the proposed variance, the applicant would be deified economically viable use of the subject property. To meet this criterion, the applicant must show that: a. The proposed use cannot meet the standards in Section 9.E (hardship variance); and b. No other application could result in permission for an economically viable use of the subject property. Evidence to meet this criterion shall include a list of uses allowed on the subject property. 2. The proposed variance is the minimum necessary to allow for the requested use; •-, 3. The proposed variance will comply with Section 4.H.8 (mitigation) and • Section 8 (erosion control); and 4. The proposed use complies with the standards of the base zone. G. Variance Conditions The Director may impose such conditions as are deemed necessary to limit any. . adverse impacts that may result from granting relief. If.a variance is granted pursuant to subsections E. 1-6, the variance shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The minimum width of the vegetated corridor shall be 15 feet on each side of a Primary Protected Water Feature, except as allowed in Section 4F; EXHIBIT C Page 28 2. No more than 25 percent of the length of the Water Quality Resource Area for a Primary Protected Water Feature within a development site can be less than 30 feet in width on each side of the water feature; and 3. In either case,the average width of the Water Quality Resource Area shall be a minimum of 15 feet on each side.for Secondary Protected Water Features,a minimum of 50 feet on each sidelor PrimaryProtected Water Features;or up to 200 feet on each side in areas with slopes greater than 25 percent. The stream shall be allowed to meander within this area, but in.no _ _ case shall the stream be less than 10 feet from the outer boundary of the Water Quality Resource Area. Section 10. Map Administration • A. The purpose of this section is to provide a process for amending the Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map to add wetlands and correct the location of Protected Water Features and the Water Quality Resource Areas . and Flood Management Area Overlay Zones. B. Map Corrections 1. Within 90 days of receiving information establishing a possible error in the existence or location of a Protected Water Feature, Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone or Flood Management Area Overlay Zone, the city/county shall provide notice to interested parties of a public hearing at which the city/county will review the information. 2 The city/county shall amend the Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map if the information demonstrates: a. That a Primary or Secondary Protected Water Feature no longer exists because the area has been legally filled, culverted or developed prior to the adoption of this ordinance; or b. The boundaries of the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone or Flood Management Area Overlay Zone have changed since adoption of the Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map. • • C. Modification of the Water Quality Resource Area To modify the Water Quality Resource Area Overlay Zone, the applicant shall demonstrate that the modification will offer the same or better EXHIBIT C Page 29 • • protection of the Protected Water Feature, Water Quality Resource Area and Flood Management Area by: 1. Preserving a vegetated corridor that will separate the Protected Water Feature from proposed development; and 2. Preserving existing vegetated cover or enhancing the Water Quality Resource Area sufficient to assist in maintaining orreducing water temperatures in the adjacent Protected Water Feature; and • 3. Enhancing the Water Quality Resource Area sufficient to minimize erosion,nutrient and pollutant loading into the adjacent Protected Water Feature; and 4. Protecting the vegetated corridor sufficient to provide filtration, infiltration and natural water purification for the adjacent Protected Water Feature; and 5. Stabilizing slopes adjacent to the Protected Water Feature. D. Adding Title 3 Wetlands. 1. Within 90 days of receiving evidence that wetland meets any of one of the criteria in D.2., the city/county shall provide notice to interested parties of a public hearing at which the city/county will review the evidence. 2. A wetland shall be protected by the standards set forth in this ordinance if the wetland meets any one of the following criteria: a. The wetland is fed by surface flows, sheet flows or • precipitation, and has evidence of flooding during the growing season, and has 60 percent or greater vegetated cover, and is over one-half acre in size; or the wetland qualifies as having"intact water quality function"under the 1996 Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology; or b. The wetland is in the Flood Management Area, and has evidence of flooding during the growing season, and is five acres or more in size, and has a restricted outlet or no outlet; or the wetland qualifies as having "intact hydrologic control function"under the 1996 Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology; or EXHIBIT C Page 30 • • • c. The wetland or a portion of the wetland is within a horizontal distance of less than one-fourth mile from a water body which meets the Department of Environmental Quality definition of`rater quality limited water body" in OAR Chapter 340,Division 41 (1996). Section 11. Consistency Where the provisions of this ordinance are less restrictive or conflict with comparable provisions of the zoning ordinance, regional, state or federal law,the provisions that are more restrictive shall govern. .Where this ordinance imposes restrictions that are more - stringent than regional, state and federal law, the provisions of this ordinance shall govern. Section 12. Warning and Disclaimer of Liability The,degree.offloodpr.otection required by this ordinance is considered reasonable for - regulatory purposes and is based on scientific and engineering considerations. Larger floods can and will occur on rare occasions. Flood heights may be increased by man-made_ or natural causes. This ordinance does not imply that land outside the areas of special flood hazards or uses permitted within such areas will be free from flooding or flood damage. This ordinance shall not create liability on the part of the City or County, any officer or employee thereof, or the Federal Insurance Administration, for any damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made hereunder. Section 13. Severability The provisions of this ordinance are severable. If any section, clause or phrase of this ordinance is adjudged to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the decision of that'court shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. • Section 14. Enforcement A. No person shall engage in or cause to occur any development,use or activity that fails to meet the standards and requirements of this ordinance. Development, uses or activities that are not specifically allowed within-the Water Quality Resource Area are prohibited. All activities that may cause visible or measurable erosion are prohibited prior to the applicant obtaining an Erosion.and Sediment Control Permit. B. In addition to other powers the city or county may exercise to enforce this ordinance, the city or county may: 1. Establish a cooperative agreement between the (enforcement authority) and the applicant (or responsible party) to remedy the violation. • EXHIBIT C • Page 31 • • 2. Issue a stop work order. 3. Impose a civil penalty of not more than$_for each violation upon the permittee, contractor or person responsible for carrying out the development work. Each day of violation shall constitute a separate offense. 4. Cause an action to be instituted in a court of competent jurisdiction. 5. Authorize summary abatement and subsequent recovery of costs incurred by the city or county. C. Upon notification by the city or county of any violation of this ordinance the. applicant,permittee, contractor or person responsible for carrying out development work may be required to immediately install emergency erosion and sediment control measures that comply with Section 8. EXHIBIT C Page 32 • • Section 15. Definitions Definitions.Unless specifically defined below,words or phrases used in.this section shall be interpreted to give them the same meaning as they have in common usage and to give this classification its most reasonable application. Architect-An architect licensed by the State of Oregon. Bankful Stage-Defined in OAR 141-85-010(definitions for Removal/Fill Permits) as the stage or elevation at which water overflows the natural banks of a stream or other waters of the state and begin to inundate upland areas. In the absence of physical evidence, the two- year recurrent flood elevation may be used to approximate the bankful stage. Created Wetlands -Those wetlands developed in an area previously identified as a non- wetland to replace, or mitigate wetland destruction or displacement. A created wetland shall-be regulated and managed the same as an existing wetland. Constructed Wetlands -Those wetlands developed as a water quality or quantity facility, subject to change and maintenance as such. These areas must be clearly defined and/or separated from naturally occurring or created wetlands. Debris -discarded man-made objects that would not occur in an undeveloped stream - corridor or wetland. Debris includes, but is not limited to, tires, vehicles, litter, scrap metal,construction waste, lumber, plastic or styrofoam. Debris does not include objects necessary to a use allowed by this ordinance, or ornamental and recreational structures. Debris does not include existing natural plant materials or natural plant materials which are left after flooding, downed or standing dead trees or trees which have fallen into protected water features. Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) Water Quality Standards - The numerical criteria or narrative condition needed in order to protect an identified beneficial • use. Design Flood Elevation -the elevation of the 100-year storm as defined in FEMA Flood Insurance Studies or, in areas without FEMA fioodplains,.the elevation of the 25-year storm,or the edge of mapped flood prone soils or similar methodologies. Development- any man-made change defined as buildings or other structures, mining, dredging,paving, filling,or grading in amounts greater than ten(10)cubic yards on any lot or excavation. In addition, any other activity that results in the removal of more than 10 percent of the vegetation in the Water Quality Resource Area on the lot is defined as - development, for the purpose of Title 3 except that more than 10 percent removal of vegetation on a lot must comply with Section 4C - Erosion and Sediment Control. Development does not include the following: a) Stream enhancement or restoration projects approved by cities and counties; b) Farming practices as defined in ORS 30.930 EXHIBIT C Page 33 • and farm use as defined in ORS 215.203,except that buildings associated with farm practices and farm uses are subject to the requirements of Title 3; and c) Construction on lots in subdivisions meeting the criteria of ORS 92.040(2)(1995). Disturb -man-made changes to the existing physical status of the land, which are made in connection with development. The following uses are excluded from the definition: enhancement or restoration of the Water Quality Resource Area; planting native cover identified in the Metro Native Plant List. Division of State Lands Wetland Determinations-As defined in OAR 141-86-200 • (1997) (definitions for Local Wetland Inventory Standards and Guidelines),"wetland determination"means identifying an area as wetland or non-wetland. Emergency-any man-made or natural event or circumstance causing or threatening loss of life, injury to person or property, and includes,but is not limited to, fire, explosion, flood, severe weather, drought earthquake,volcanic activity, spills or releases of oil or hazardous material, contamination, utility or transportation disruptions, and disease. Engineer- A registered professional engineer licensed by the State of Oregon. Enhancement- the process of improving upon the natural functions and/or values of an area or feature which has been degraded by human activity. Enhancement activities may or may not return the site to a pre-disturbance condition,but create/recreate processes and features that occur naturally. • Engineering Geologist - A registered professional engineering geologist licensed by the State of Oregon. Erosion . Erosion is the movement of soil particles resulting from actions of water or wind. Fill-any material such as,but not limited to, sand,gravel,soil,rock or gravel that is placed in a Title 3 wetland or floodplain for the purposes of development or redevelopment. Floodway Fringe-The area of the floodplain, lying outside the floodway, which does not contribute appreciably to the passage of flood water, but serves as a retention area. Floodplain - The land area identified and designated by the United States Army Corps of Engineers,the Oregon Division of State Lands, FEMA, or(identify name) county/city that has been or may be covered temporarily by water as a result of a storm event of identified frequency. It is usually the flat area of land adjacent to a stream or river formed by floods. EXHIBIT C Page 34 • • • Floodway -The portion of a watercourse required for the passage or conveyance of a given - storm event as identified and designated by the(identify name)city/county pursuant to this Ordinance. The floodway shall include the channel of the watercourse and the adjacent floodplain that must be reserved in an unobstructed condition in order to discharge the base flood without flood levels by more than one foot. Flood Management Areas-all lands contained within the 100-year floodplain, flood area and floodway as shown on the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Maps and the area of inundation for the February 1996 flood. In addition, all lands which have documented evidence of flooding. Invasive Non-native or Noxious Vegetation -plant species that have been introduced • and due to aggressive growth patterns and lack of natural enemies in the area where . introduced, spread rapidly into native plant communities, or which are not listed on the Metro Native Plant List as adopted by Metro Council resolution. Lot- Lot means a single unit of land that is created by a subdivision of land. (ORS 92.010(3)). Mitigation -the reduction of adverse effects of a proposed project by considering,in the ; order:.a)avoiding the impact all together by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; b) minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation; c)rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating or restoring the effected environment; d) reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action by monitoring and taking appropriate measures; and e)compensating for the impact by replacing or providing comparable substitute water quality resource areas. •� -Native Vegetation- any vegetation native to the-Portland metropolitan area or listed on - the Metro Native Plant list as adopted by Metro Council resolution. ODFW Construction Standards - Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife construction guidelines for building roads, bridges and culverts or any transportation structure within a waterway. Open Space- Land that is undeveloped and that is planned to remain so indefinitely. The term encompasses parks, forests and farm land. It may also refer only to land zoned as being available to the public, including playgrounds, watershed preserves and parks. Ordinary Mean High Water Line - As defined in OAR 141-82-005 as the line on the bank or shore to which water ordinarily rises in season; synonymous with.Mean High Water(ORS 274.005). EXHIBIT C Page 35 • Ordinary Mean Low Water Line-As defined in OAR 141-82-005 as the line on the on the bank or shore to which water ordinarily recedes in season; synonymous with Mean Low Water(ORS 274.005). Owner or Property Owner-The person who is the legal record owner of the land, or where there is a recorded land sale contract, the purchaser thereunder. Parcel -Parcel means a single unit of land that is created by.a partitioning of land. (ORS 92.010(7)). Perennial Streams - means all primary and secondary perennial water ways mapped by • the U.S. Geological Survey. Plans -The drawings and designs that specify construction details as prepared by the Engineer. _ Post-Construction Erosion Control-Consists of re-establishing groundcover or landscaping prior to the removal of temporary erosion control measures. • Practicable- means available and capable of being done after taking into consideration cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of overall project purpose. Protected Water Features Primary Protected Water Features shall include: a. Title 3 wetlands; and b. rivers, streams, and drainages downstream from the point at which 100 acres or more are drained to that water feature (regardless of whether it • carries year-round flow); and c. streams carrying year-round flow; and d. springs which feed streams and wetlands and have year-round flow and e. natural lakes. Secondary Protected Water Features shall include intermittent streams and seeps downstream of the point at which 50 acres are drained and upstream of the point at which 100 acres are drained to that water feature. Restoration - the process of returning a disturbed or altered area or feature to a previously existing natural condition. Restoration activities reestablish the structure, function, and/or diversity to that which occurred prior to impacts caused by human activity. EXHIBIT C page 36 • "Resource"versus "Facility" - The distinction being made is between a"resource," a functioning natural system such as a wetland or stream; and a"facility"which refers to a created or constructed structure or drainage way that is designed, constructed and maintained to collect and filter, retain,or detain surface water run-off during and after a storm event for the purpose of water quality improvement. Riparian -Those areas associated with streams, lakes and wetlands where vegetation communities are predominately influenced by their association with water; Routine Repair and Maintenance--activities directed at preserving an existing allowed • use or facility,without expanding the development footprint or site use. Set-back Adjustment-The placement of a building a specified distance away from a road,property line or protected resource. _ • Significant Negative Impact- an impact that affects the natural environment, considered individually or cumulatively with other impacts on the Water Quality Resource Area, to the point where existing water quality functions and values are degraded. Statewide Planning Goal 5 - Oregon's statewide planning goal that addresses open space, scenic and historic areas, and natural resources. The purpose of the goal is to conserve open space and protect natural and scenic resources. Statewide Planning Goal 6 - Oregon's statewide planning'goal that addresses air, water and land resources quality to "maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state" as implemented by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC). Statewide Planning Goal 7 - Oregon's statewide planning goal that addresses areas subject to natural disasters and hazards to"protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards"as implemented by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC). Steep slopes - Steep slopes are those slopes that are equal to or greater than 25%. Steep slopes have been removed from the"buildable lands"inventory and have not been used in calculations to determine the number of acres within the urban growth boundary which are available for development. Stormwater Pre-treatment Facility—any structure or drainage way that is designed, • constructed, and maintainedlo collect and filter, retain, or detain surface water run-off during and after a storm event for the purpose of water quality improvement. Stream - a body of running water moving over the earth's surface in a channel or bed, such as a creek, rivulet or river. It flows at least part of the year, including perennial and EXHIBIT C Page 37 • • intermittent streams. Streams are dynamic in nature and their structure is maintained through build-up and loss of sediment. Structure-A building or other major improvement that is built, constructed or installed, not including minor improvements, such as fences, utility poles, flagpoles or irrigation system components, that are not customarily regulated through zoning codes. Substantial Compliance-city and county comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances, on the whole,conform with the purposes of the performance standards in the -functional plan and any failure to meet individual performance standard requirements is technical or minor in nature. • Title 3 Wetlands -wetlands of metropolitan concern as shown on the Metro Water Quality and Flood Management Area Map and other wetlands added to city or county adopted Water Quality and Flood Management Area maps consistent with the criteria in Title 3, Section 7.C. Title 3 wetlands do not include artificially constructed and managed stormwater and water quality treatment facilities. Top of Bank -The same as "bankful stage"defined in OAR 141-85-010(2). Utility Facilities -buildings, structures or any constructed portion of a system which provides for the production, transmission, conveyance, delivery or furnishing of services including, but not limited to, heat, light, water, power, natural gas, sanitary sewer, stormwater, telephone and cable television. Utility facilities do not include stormwater pre-treatment facilities. Variance-means a discretionary decision to permit modification of the terms of an implementing ordinance based on a demonstration of unusual hardship or exceptional circumstances unique to a specific property. Vegetated Corridor—the area of setback between the top of bank of a Protected Water Feature and the delineated edge of the Water Quality Resource Area as defined in Table 1. Visible or Measurable Erosion -Visible or measurable erosion includes, but is not limited to: Deposits of mud, dirt sediment or similar material exceeding one-half cubic foot in volume on public or private streets, adjacent property, or onto the storm and surface water system, either by direct deposit, dropping discharge, or as a result of the action of erosion. • Evidence of concentrated flows of water over bare soils; turbid or sediment-laden flows; or evidence of on-site erosion such as rivulets on bare soil slopes, where the flow of water is not filtered or captured on the site. Earth slides, mudflows, earth sloughing, or other earth movement that leaves the property. EXHIBIT C Page 38 • • Water Quality Resource Areas - vegetated corridors and the adjacent water feature as established in Title 3. Water Quality and Floodplain Management Area-The area that identifies where the Water Quality Resource Area and Floodplain Management Area Overlay Zone is applied. Water Quality Facility- Any structure or drainage way that is designed,:constructed and . . maintained to collect and filter, retain, or detain surface water nun-off during and after a .storm event for the purpose of water quality improvement. It may also include,but is not limited to,existing features such as constructed wetlands,water quality swales, and ponds . that are maintained as stormwater quality control facilities. Watershed- A watershed is a geographic unit defined by the flows of rainwater or snowmelt. All land in a watershed drains to a common outlet, such as a stream, lake or wetland. Wetlands-Wetlands are those areas inundated or saturated by surface or ground water.at a _. _ _ frequency and duration sufficient to support and under normal circumstances do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes,bogs and similar areas. Wetlands are those areas identified and delineated by a qualified wetland specialist as set forth in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. • • EXHIBIT C Page 39 i • • • Proposed Method for Determining - . • Vegetated Conidors Next to Primary . . . Protected Water Features Figure t 70O • eo Zr :10....,How measure slope (Figure 1) • LI L2 Measure 50 feet horizontally (L1)from the K stream (top of bank)and determine the slope "' . (H1/L1 -the difference in elevation divided . by the difference in horizontal distance multiplied by 100). - • If the slope in this 50-foot area is less than Figure 2 25%, the corridor width is 50 feet from the Slope<25% top of bank(see Figure 2). s .50'Buffer 0 5a • . If the slope'in the 50-foot area is 25% or greater, measure another 25 feet horizontally. If the slope in this incremental 25-foot area is now less than 25% (H2/L2 Figure 3 1.2,•• < 25%), the vegetated corridor width would tar Boner • >25%!H: . �_ be 100 feet (50 feet for the horizontal distance from the top of bank with slope greater than 25% PLUS an additional 50 0 sor 7S 10a feet). (See Figure 3.) . If the slope is greater than 25% in this - incremental 25-foot area, continue End Point measurin9 the slope every 25 feet (H/L) Figure 4 >25 S/<25% until you either. 125'Buffer .zsx j i i i (a) find a slope less than 25% (see Figure 4), or 1 I . • 0 50' 75100'12f (When you find a slope less than•25%, the • . vegetated corridor equals the distance from the stream's top of bank to the end point of • the last surveyed 25-foot increment with a End Pow slope greater than 25% PLUS an additional • Figure 5 n '^ueR1°"'• f >25x f—.25%—• 50 feet). 200'Buffer i (b) reach 200 feet (the maximum corridor I .. . . width). (See Figure 5.) I • 1 . . 1 . . 1 0 5a 75100 12515a 175'207 • • Advantages: • Provides protection for most steep slopes, • yet corridor widths can be varied to fit a number of different situations (corridor widths include 50 feet to 100 feet, 125 feet, 150 feet, 175 feet, and 200 feet) • Provides flexibility. Disadvantages: • Does not protect slopes that rise steeply after a gradual 'floodplairi' area. • . • • The Metro Water Quality and Flood Management Areas map consists of quadrangle maps which were adopted by the Metro Council on June 18, 1998, as part of Ordinance 98-7300. The maps are available for review and may be copied at the Metro Regional Headquarters. • • DEFINITIONS (Title 10) Design Flood Elevation -the elevation of the 100-year storm as defined in FEMA Flood Insurance Studies or, in areas without FEMA floodplain, the elevation of the 25-year storm,or the edge of mapped flood prone soils or similar methodologies. • • Development-any man-made change defined as buildings or other structures,mining, dredging,paving, filling,or grading in amounts greater than ten.(10)cubic yards on any lot or excavation. In addition,any other activity that results in the removal of more than 10 percent of the vegetation in the Water Quality Resource Area on the lot is defined as - development, for the-purpose of Title 3 except that more than 10.percent removal of - vegetation on a lot must comply with Section 4C -Erosion and Sediment Control. Development does not include the following: a) Stream enhancement or restoration projects approved by cities and counties; b) Farming practices as defined in ORS 30.930 and farm use as defined in ORS 215.203,except that buildings-associated with farm practices and farm uses are subject to the requirements of Title 3; and c)Construction on lots in subdivisions meeting the criteria of ORS 92.040(2) (1995). Emergency-any man-made or natural event or circumstance causing or threatening loss of life, injury to person or property, and includes,but is not limited to, fire, explosion, flood, severe weather, drought earthquake, volcanic activity, spills or releases of oil or hazardous material, contamination, utility or transportation disruptions,and disease. Enhancement - the process of improving upon the natural functions and/or values of an area or feature which has been degraded by human activity. Enhancement activities may or may not return the site to a pre-disturbance condition,but create/recreate processes and . features that occur naturally. Fill-any material such as,but not limited to, sand, gravel,soil, rock or gravel that is plat c4.in a wetland or floodplain for the purposes of development or redevelopment. Flood Management Areas- all lands contained within the 100-year floodplain, flood area and floodway as shown on the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Maps and the area of inundation for the February 1996 flood. In addition, all lands which have documented evidence of flooding. Invasive Non-native or Noxious Vegetation -plant species that have been introduced and due to aggressive growth patterns and lack of natural enemies in the area where introduced, spread rapidly into native plant communities,or which are not listed on the Metro Native Plant List as adopted by Metro Council resolution. Mitigation - the reduction of adverse effects of a proposed project by considering, in the following order: a) avoiding the impact all together by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; b) minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and • its implementation; c) rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating or restoring the EXHIBIT E Page I • • effected environment; d)reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action by monitoring and taking appropriate measures; and e) compensating for the impact by replacing or providing comparable substitute water quality resource areas. • Native Vegetation -any vegetation native to the Portland metropolitan area or listed on the Metro Native Plant list as adopted by Metro Council resolution. Protected Water Features Primary Protected Water Features shall include: • a. Title 3 wetlands; and b. rivers, streams, and drainages downstream. from the point at which 100 acres or more are drained to that water feature(regardless of whether it carries year-round flow); and c. streams carrying year-round flow; and d. springs which feed streams and wetlands and have year-round flow and e. natural lakes. Secondary Protected Water Features shall include intermittent streams and seeps • downstream of the point at which 50 acres are drained and upstream of the point at which 100 acres are drained to that water feature. Restoration'.= the-process-of returning a disturbed or altered area or feature to a previously existing natural condition. Restoration activities reestablish the structure, function, and/or diversity to that which occurred prior to impacts caused by human activity. Routine Repair and Maintenance - activities directed at preserving an existing allowed use or facility,without expanding the development footprint or site use. Significant Negative Impact- an impact that affects the natural environment,considered individually or cumulatively with other impacts on the Water Quality Resource Area, to the point where existing water quality functions and values are degraded. Stream- a body of running water moving over the earth's surface in a channel or bed, such as a creek, rivulet or river. It flows at least part of the year, including perennial and intermittent streams. Streams are dynamic in nature and their structure is maintained through build-up and loss of sediment. EXHIBIT E Puge 2 • • • Substantial Compliance-city and county comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances, on the whole, conform with the purposes of the performance standards in the functional plan and any failure to meet individual performance standard requirements is technical or minor in nature. Title 3 Wetlands -wetlands of metropolitan concern as shown on the Metro Water Quality and Flood Management Area Map and other wetlands added.to city or county adopted Water Quality and Flood Management Area maps consistent with the criteria in Title 3, Section 7.C. Title 3 wetlands do not include artificially constructed and managed stormwater and water quality treatment facilities. Visible or Measurable Erosion - visible or measurable erosion includes,but is not limited to: a. Deposits of mud, dirt sediment or similar material exceeding one-half cubic foot in volume On public or private streets, adjacent property, or onto the storm and surface water system, either by direct deposit, dropping discharge, or as a result of the action of erosion. b. Evidence of concentrated flows of water over bare soils; turbid or sediment laden flows; or evidence of on-site erosion such as rivulets on bare soil slopes, where the flow of water is not filtered or captured on the site. c. Earth slides, mudflows, earth sloughing, or other earth movement that leaves the property. Utility Facilities - buildings, structures or any constructed portion of a system which provides for the production, transmission, conveyance, delivery or furnishing of services including, but not limited to,heat, light, water, power, natural gas, sanitary sewer, stormwater, telephone and cable television. Water Quality Resource Areas - vegetated corridors and the adjacent water feature as established in Title 3. Wetlands - Wetlands are those areas inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support and under normal circumstances do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes,bogs and similar areas. Wetlands are those areas identified and delineated by a qualified wetland specialist as set forth in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. I:\PAT\FINAL.T3 EXHIBIT E Page 3 • • • . . GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE AND COUNCIL WORK SESSION REPORT CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 98-730C, FOR THE PURPOSE OF AMENDING ORDINANCE Nos. 96-647C AND NO. 97-715B, TO AMEND TITLE 3 OF THE URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONAL PLAN, AND AMEND THE REGIONAL FRAMEWORK PLAN, APPENDIX A, AND ADOPT THE TITLE 3 MODEL ORDINANCE AND WATER QUALITY AND FLOOD MANAGEMENT MAPS. • Date: June 9, 1998 Presented by: Counselor Naito Committee Action: At its May 28, 1998 meeting, the Growth Management Committee amended Ordinance 98-730A and then voted 2-1 to recommend Council adoption of Ordinance 98-730B. The ordinance is also referred to as the Stream and Floodplain Protection Plan. Voting in favor: councilors McCaig, and Naito. Voting against: councilor Morissette. Council Action: The full Council held a work session on Ordinance 98-730B, on June 4, 1998, and accepted further amendments, generally of a technical nature as proposed by legal counsel or staff. Current Document: The ordinance consists of: • The cover ordinance --References the relation of this ordinance to RUGGO's, the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan and the Regional Framework Plan; detailing review performed by advisory committees, Growth Management Committee and the Council; and specifying the impact of this Ordinance on the Framework Plan and Metro code. • Exhibit A--Contains sections 1-4, revising Title 3 of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan(which was adopted in the fall of 1996). Section 4 contains performance standards with which cities and counties must comply. These sections been extensively reorganized compared to the original Title 3. • Exhibit B--Sections 5-7 references Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation, and requirements for Model Ordinance and Map Adjustment Process. This exhibit was not significantly revised from the original Title 3. • Exhibit C--The Model Ordinance. Its creation was required by the original Title 3, and is one way cities and counties can demonstrate compliance. In addition, the performance standards in Exhibit A do not become effective until 18 months after Metro Council adoption of the Model Ordinance and the Water Quality and Flood Management Areas Map. • • ' • Exhibit D--Water Quality and'Flood Management Areas Map. • Exhibit E--Definitions applying to Title 3 of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan, but residing in Title 10 of same. Committee and Council Issues/Discussion: The following amendments to the March 25 MPAC recommended version of the ordinance, were adopted by the Growth Management Committee. Council amendments are indicated by *. Cover Ordinance • Accepted language recommended by Office of General Counsel clarifying that no substantive changes were made to the Original Title 3, sections 5-7. The cover ordinance was also amended to direct that sections 1 and 2 of Title 8 of the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan(Compliance) be amended. Title 8 will now contain explicit references to Title 3 and direct the timing of local hearings, information to be transmitted to Metro and Metro's role in notice to citizens and review of the results of the hearings. * A new section, section 11, was added to provide a severability clause, protecting those parts of the ordinance which are not part of an appeal,or ultimately found to be contrary to law. Exhibit A Revised Table 1, describing vegetated corridor requirements, to be consistent with a similar, but more condensed table in the model ordinance. Specifications remain the same. Table 1 was also revised to make clearer where measurements begin when delineating water features. - Agreed with MPAC recommendation concerning language for existing structures and alternatives analysis (Section 4.D.3.d). A key amendment known as"Discussion draft 1 B" modified several components of exhibit A, especially "Section 3--Implementation Alternatives for Cities and Counties." It clarified the relation between map and text in the identification of, and application of title 3 to wetlands. In summary, a local jurisdiction will have the option of adopting a field verified map, or code language in complying with performance standards. The application of field verified maps was also clarified and expanded. In addition, cities and counties will be required to hold at least one public hearing prior to adopting comprehensive plan amendments, implementing ordinances and maps, and documents related to same must be available for public review at least 45 days prior to the public hearing. • • *Language relating to map administration was moved from Section 7 of Exhibit B, into (a new) section 4.E., Map Administration. It had already been revised to clarify the timing and process for amending maps where errors had been identified. The process, when related to wetlands was been clarified and expanded. By moving the language into the Performance Measures section, the Council made it clear that map criteria and requirements are properly attached to Title 3 performance standards,not Fish and Wildlife Habitat Protection (Exhibit B). Exhibit B * With the removal of map procedures language, section 7 now reverts to Title 3 language originally adopted in 996, covering variances related to fish and wildlife habitat. Exhibit C Agreed to a housekeeping motion to include the table of contents and appendix to the model ordinance. Amended model Ordinance to be consistent with change to Exhibit A, replacement and rehabilitation of existing structures and alternatives analysis (Section 3.H.7.f). Agreed with MPAC recommendation to section 3.I.7 clarifying regulation of nonconforming uses in the vegetated corridors. Agreed to definitions for"disturb" and "stormwater pre-treatment facility" in the definitions section (section 14) of the Model Ordinance. Also agreed to revise the definition of"development"to include application to buildings associated with farm practices and farm uses, to be consistent with similar change to Exhibit E (below). Directed legal council to review model ordinance for consistency with all May 28 amendments. * A new section 3 was added, titled "Administration", which corresponds to map/text requirements in the performance standards section (4)of Exhibit A. *A new section 10, "Map Administration", was also added which corresponds to Section 4E mentioned above. Exhibit D * Four map amendments were approved. They were related to map errors, and had been submitted with sufficient lead time to be reviewed by staff and others. Exhibit E Amended definition of"development" to include application to buildings associated with farm practices and farm uses. The language was suggested by legal counsel, at the request of MPAC. • • Included a definition for "debris". The definition of wetland has been revised to be consistent with the Department of State Lands (DSL). A definition of "Title 3 Wetlands" is also created to refer to wetlands of metropolitan concern. * Invasive Non-Native or Noxious Vegetation now refers to a list to be adopted separately, by Metro Council Resolution. Future Council Action: Ordinance 98-730C will appear on the June 18 Council agenda for final adoption. • • • CITY OF TIGARD FORESTED NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT Michael R. Reichenbach . .. Arboreal Enterprises I SEE MAP FIVE_ _ _ ,. I aliitura X11►..24 0; � ! � du15Ign ,Vi '.l"_.%� _:1.■.' moms, ,r-.mum 11�:mute -uu� Anil • I s 5 4� "INN"1'! 1:11/'. ••I 111111:1111■IIIa � •1 Name . � == .,OM • r r�. w .i7 RA 11111:1©Ill.a��1:1■1®,�1 'x1:111 i am � ����- ,,g� .11�m.IJI-suns I L ■111 119 J�1 •: -w- a`' ■EMI VIM I rl 1111■n. 1fli11R1■■ X77_ '` %I�'�' ri ■1111 1:'1"1111U SIIW III:'I IT 1'�" �'�' .. � . = ne.E Ilr3.n ■-■Fn br1'�•r; er • pn unn Iglu aal:am 111118 lid rim En AuE p: IR7■ .I�m Ilr/, _�©.%111!all I:111U : _■■9 1,swill ,1111 ! 1 ■11' f�J 111111 111 ��� ■r�.►•"1� . 4 "s �A AI�is!!II :1111x.i' !Hilt 111.1 i©M■Ii1ii■-i� it g-�ti\�, 1�� 1: 1111 x'111' am:UM!gun — ➢➢1©1 �—pia • • o.` u(I L 4 ,L..�i.T.ri� 1111: 11•n mr. uL■ �imilm■■■-- � ' wa_1 r irrAilPle• �. ;� � i lM■P : mm= If i- uns d; ■.�D iliiii . ■a:.�ITSE6►0�-.�■ -'C �sf3�3 M 1 I♦m ag 4_101..■ ■■E lig 41 �=1°� gr.IGRE:ut.P11:. f11111► 't:: :"■':-: : ea ill Iligl r Vi�r�r■■u. c■ -o ■ ell .i1I:t i■.at air r.• r i ' A INERHIII4. '11150111"" '4\ 0 ..Att rmeilEdEl(l_Elg] . . ,...4 NI "...L. !..r 0 , � :L ;• likinfon• �I �/` �r+e�r��-�� :�,���=� ki 1 ro •� � IwA ,' �IIII ® L L. , �.�,dinnn�1.111U� ti',. .' .•�5'I'.'..-,c•�'s%+►0 1�` �� 1 �� 1/111 -`'I EMMEN � it ..� � • • �� � ■AW •; ,�w ::ajti: �\. • o VW. ■1111•� IW `.1111 �. 1..:. w e:�.� ♦�' l ♦,_( .4.,-4/1„, \ • x..111.111 0*a!um w r..�ns. �►!�♦y'r';:... A . � �� VI AP ,^:.■1111111; 5 .. . , Rffit�CS�?4,.-7 -W 1} ��� -.N. ' AC 111 I�,'� �.'_q` �.:•■-- �':\..,% �' 4 to . atom .� �" �< ,v,-*. V�•, ,yam i/�War ilit ?■■iiim■■■ `�r■ q' CITY OF TIGARD • • �, .i ce �1 e1IFI■r■e i ■�• i . R.Pe_.e� ; -s.44,* ��"� . ,i. .� Ire _■nom.Is FORESTED• ���;��*��� �`•� '�s,� �1►` NATURAL AREAS • c.,•_ ��0�■ .; ,, r ir■k �` � ■11 :-=, •- MAP TWO Ili ''` � ....•• ...,-'44)...4' R ..,� ? ,x.41 ,1'■11��. , ..``;,; ' i �i �° w ��©■■■■a■■ �.,,, Color I PotentiQI ��h���: '''"�.}'�QiSG"►i•�?�+".o"' �. <:`` I ■■■1111■t �1• ,;b;:i _ .. t ■■■■ �: Red 9 ■■11\• •I..�♦i+LOS S.. f r' � d`.. lig■ �4 ^�i i•�-C1'�♦_ •�. .� • ' s � •q ■ �� •• Blue Moderate ,to,0 4,t∎A1r•le ∎ < ` nom: ■\f11, t �D� Ll A •4;••�s?° ••i:.4! a 4- �� ai .<�.�� 11�■1■�� Green ` Low y :��; \111■■ �E�� +.������,�+.��.nll►�e iii�1�� ",. • :�:;I i���c iip+�r ' S;$;020111+" 111q������� �IIIIIII North`� �1 14 mile J.`�I� �••' Filial ,� 1 °� `.r Pre axed ��Me Reichentach February /,:1�11I(!�11111 414` 4011111111M, �� _ real Enle iii 3 � P � :994• r��01 AL:!V'��■■■ ��,��©.��sd��!111�l X11 �:�-5• 's: 0,I���j] 1111m ■d'LAI_1 ��� c� •, �:•"..- _•... �Iprr1.JJJ ICStG°W •• • ■ ��esE► nal, O� (V .PM 11.1 IY er a am.I 29128 = YEN .. 2:r s rr��'.:.� 271 26 . 32 1a�\ ■i-:r o AL p♦♦ ■tI v�*ec1r�II��1�5 t� /� .` eus nis 3li 35 fit/;i r►■ ♦.♦l♦, n„„7 +I 1■r1 u,,O♦�,l i, :. + .. '■■■■1\eat 1n■■rr 'I1• L`II►�: —laird, CENTER iii. plink 1lf3to u1c■1n:r1:Ge to�♦v\ :i .. r i ■ t! ■I I ili ■Icy Ikt ai i■■'JI'r ■■7r!■•' . g,. ICITY OF TIGARD u ■■�:0 it.4,nr,.�,>.,■,� -F o..FA■ 1■•°'1Ji/i�n.. ifi��11►b M ,r.► 4�♦p♦t�)♦♦1. _■.:MI �':III■• n.r■■4t+ ©' �: ♦. FORESTED °-mum l}-,me se��” /E`sir rm° �, '4 unL t25i id L1111111!.14144.�i�i . ::e� /ii;:ci';tiii!Ni w oo't�,R i fit I .. NATURAL AREAS = .• •• .,.A.� .1��i .. . •,...■ •aa • MAP FOUR �1� .n►• GOIOtential ' ► °i�► /'► •�� • "ra r uxllt mos I Red High i �� ..•„.,�'�=1 Inn a..at t= ► ;.�.l,ll ln7 �' , '�. i .,X�.°'�..4U►�••,'�l�ZCT !411111ns■BNroll, III-�I 81ue Moderote I ac i�rae�A 4.0 .3��,,,,,� . ■1►, l mN■" . ■'AI U ba For°�� r p' •n a m■♦ 1�Aj W �.■t11■i IIIr Green Low a� •.►•e■nr.�+��»�r ! 1 II�.1 tea/ �-1'E ° : �.. wr / �� ���Ili I�� `' bil�lllllei?I� ref■G.si►�`7'�►!•-�■ ' 10���1■i�■I„ I North \\ ‘.,:;;•, .a��� ■■u►�1um:rif 1I re■�I!AlIONIII gins p3sv 7:1�'" 1 / 1 I _ 0 1/4 mile \ r. • •n� �.,.. �,,4i� ■0 ♦♦♦ _• Prepared by Nike Re¢hen6och II February ;\) �.:caul-Hilt.-e.,..1.e•►,p��Qit,I•' I'SI�,♦��AMMO■■u♦'♦'! ♦��♦' Wbaeol Enterprises 1994 \, ..: dour,„,2..♦ L1■ai 1-xii ii am ♦�♦ ♦jc■■mor. �\' a�-r-it B�$a,,�c1-��UPI�� � "�-•� mill 1 � 1.r;,C.� R�,.,, ” •t tc I�7•II■rlNlnn l *, 6dI■/ �2.;:;.;.<K,• r. uc ,■11111.•�G♦ X91■. �:=sawn W 7 F �,;3`^ II _... ;�\ \\' ; .:1=u•..► ie .-tilt C� % - _ ■�n� ■�r ,�,, �� ‘, 1,‘ \,.�\ ���' lC� ceci:���i,Lie 1 7i' 11111 ,qR����r�6 R,p,.,.., i��gulls im ♦ g;1 iu, `_ eland ♦ ♦■IllYinAy . s:iii , ,.■ vs•q■p+■ 11 \ 6`ma ► \�\ \1` � lfll l,lIDO ■C�`� 7■0■ Rit 33•'J:\ :it ■�i0 raldelitypie�h\/!1 3� l,, 0�1�% ■e''. \ S ,-- s\\ \,∎•w,\�\\ `\O,. o\:rC.•,'\..,„ `,\,. � �' „' `/■to < ■.■■niu 11 • =u t - 2 C \. ....•�V`�;i. , �� I lllllB■111' :I'm i\�� �.. \s� � �Y' 'a: �'.. 11 t n/■/U` ■ � \ \\ �.' 1° 1 ■■■■' n ■11■■■ ■. y\\\\ \ � .N � �pill�Ft .■ /• /d/ �■\� �\ ♦�., n as o1��_..3r3t�■'Lt:� .. ..► . ■: D` .^ � 1 ■�� .■ ;. :\.\� t 1.0\., tea we 1 ■ Ip 1 : ... 9�aQ6om■M.111E 1,6 f4e� i !: , s� tfi 1 .. `R'■�1 f w Q .t1 n r■ ►./fi`a■ tp ' U.ba...For,-4+ gat.�♦ :./) I Ilir \�` Lit, ,.!f pa....., IT9€4 tail fei F�oA y ��� 111 , I �= �. \ � ��'[rcc►;•��i � ...o.pun._ ■.i�.�h� /I■�Ipso_1''1111 •p11' �pl�lll 1 � -•,, �.1nnVi ``'" •I::: P. V I .0♦i'•. fi ' P .r.' ■ .�53 ' • 1■ .�■•■ ...11■ �z ♦tea ■-� 1 =p -p �'y■uq/ ■ ■►, -, D ` 1� � O n� R,p° ,ate a" \ R .��1■'�i■ri�'a°• "%IV• 0$1. 11,,,j1114.5.100111/1 ,a 1 1�1i��■11�.` %� < a .. `ate I III �y 04 ��fILIIILICIrMell i Mai�I ,w, 1►�0K ��lir+l E ; pp ■ fy■■■■ T■ ..0 _ �•AI' gi ell�I.1 T :44: A „5,...4.m.MO I:046# �,i : :, 17,, . `:. :,, IIL1h1;! Lh1P 111111111■ 1 ;�„40401.r t t.. e I \ ' \' F°4,,,, IRl7 !9■I V 1 u ■ ■■1■ 7I. ► �fiOln..---- y \\\ \r �� S\�� ::��\�;02141.■.■■.■■��/\.�~ i�.>`e\ `; ��,is�llRl-"I�C���� A►p�li♦��3 !�'il��!!.'■i;� I .:r \ \\\ 4113- `C�V 11 /a \ a1 :Ir ° f' Port ``\`.\ \\: 1' r t1 y: s .11 1111■Itttt�t■`r'�1/ at,0,,, �.-j. ■111111 1 ©.I•\\ \.\\\ :v ! \J ,,�„ senlni' 1 + 6 e11RRm11■�!1 �•♦ ■,- n�6• y .eiillll_ ■�11� \�f \ � �� \ ,k'n**Ri 3 1' l 4 �1�■■1111111•�/�♦♦ ±��ayp�:�'ii-n■1%1111 :_��/•ow \ 'S• �” am 9 1 i�r/ � \\ � : �!1$.! ►'�is:�w Mk;i■„■�[R111 i.� r . \ \\\ �. /.,0.: 111 O o Y' 1414- ■■■_ ■•`\\ �� ��\".�� ; > S13•Q►►t��� 3� ,�.t,e_ \ ♦ /i♦♦ G � if IrT.��-r lit :. 4. I \"\ � s"' _'' fi xou4 a`a� i1 t 3' \\`r., ♦'�/ ♦ 11111111 � �'Ire\\ C� 1 U\'- ' .a/ ¢ ��e' 1' i a¢ir.■r�.Y"Alain 1111■fit \\ \ ...., \\\\ �\ ` tip w�1(�♦! �— w , .• i��■�Ak Div @614C171/� I�� ®�\ :\\'‘ \ ,t' ' \\ Irn•-�4 ♦�: it ■.all. .ures�,■ww� .. ■j ss ■ \ �' s!y _ ��I�t11e� MA �' ' E E■ ®■■t. e re •�F 1■�ae:�l.o emu■■mm �!t■111.�\.11 I!L !rrr1ur!�■∎ \ , J' 9IIll ■ .. � "i■■it \`�� ► �i ■ ■■ l'a■tnia�r .�♦ i ■■� ■I ►. o'er ■■" p tow SEE MAP THREE • • City of Tigard Forest Areas Inventory Page 1 Data Sheet 1 NATURAL AREA 19 2 DATE of evaluation 1/4/94 CATEGORY OF 3 NATURAL AREA Forested, Unique forested_ VEGETATION TYPE upland conifer • upland mix upland deciduous 4 upland shrub riparian conifer. riparian mix riparian deciduous riparian shrub riparian mix CANOPY CLOSURE 5 closed open scattered scattered 6 COMMON TREE SPECIES Oregon white ash, Oregon white oak, Ponderosa pine • OCCURRENCE OF HABITAT 7 abundant common uncommon uncommon 8 ESTIMATED AGE >100 SUCCESSIONAL STAGE very early success 9 early successional mature late successional old growth mature to late successional 10 ESTIMATED SIZE 18 11 LINKAGES high, low, none high 12 RANK NATURAL QUALITY 1 to 5 3 13 RANK SIZE .1/acre 1.8 14 RANK LINKAGES 0 to 1 1 15 RANK FEATURES 0 to 3 1 16 TOTAL RANK , 6.8 Prepared by Mike Reichenbach Appendix C February. 1994 • • City of Tigard Forest Areas Inventory Page 2 Data Sheet 1 NATURAL AREA 19 17 SITE VALUES wildlife, open space, passive park use • 18 COMPATIBILITY WITH Much of this area is already dedicated to park use. The DEVELOPMENT ponderosa pine and Oregon white oak to the north and west of the park represent a remnant of a Oregon white oak/ponderosa pine remnant. Development to preserve the natural character of the savanna community is not compatible. However, development could proceed if only individual trees are to be preserved. 19 COMMENTS This unit represents two distinct natural communities. A evidence of disturbance remnant of the Oregon white oak savanna and a more wildlife observations common riparian unit. Both areas have show evidence of management needs disturbance. Within the park, lawn has been established existing uses under the trees. Along the.stream Himalaya black berry other is the predominant vegetation. Restoration of this area to a more natural condition would require removal of the non-native species and replacement with native grasses and shrubs. Add one point for the uncommon nature of this community. Prepared by Mike Reichenbach Appendix C February, 1994 • • City of Tigard Forest Areas Inventory Page 1 Data Sheet 1 NATURAL AREA 50 2 DATE of evaluation 12/29/9:3 CATEGORY OF 3 NATURAL AREA Forested, Unique forested VEGETATION TYPE upland conifer upland mix upland deciduous 4 upland shrub riparian conifer riparian mix riparian deciduous riparian shrub riparian mix/upland mix CANOPY CLOSURE 5 closed open _ scattered closed 6 COMMON TREE Oregon white ash, Douglas-fir, bigleaf maple, western red cedar, SPECIES Oregon white oak, Ponderosa pine OCCURRENCE OF HABITAT 7 abundant common uncommon uncommon 8 ESTIMATED AGE > 100 for the ponderosa pine SUCCESSIONAL STAGE very early success 9 early successional mature late successional old growth late successional 10 ESTIMATED SIZE 24 11 LINKAGES high, low, none high 12 RANK NATURAL QUALITY 1 to 5 4 13 RANK SIZE .1/acre 2.4 RANK LINKAGES 14 0 t 1 1 15 RANK FEATURES 0 to 3 2 16 TOTAL RANK 9.4 Prepared by Mike Reichenbach Appendix C February, 1994 • • City of Tigard Forest Areas Inventory Page 2 Data Sheet 1 NATURAL AREA 50 17 SITE VALUES Wildlife, open space, learning area for school, wetland 18 COMPATIBILITY WITH none DEVELOPMENT 19 COMMENTS Much of this site is on Fowler Junior High School evidence of disturbance Property. The area is has a diversity of habitats including wildlife observations wetland and Oregon white oak/Ponderosa pine habitat. management needs existing uses Add two points for uncommon forest type and for wetland. other SRI wetlands include E34, E35, E36 and B17. • Prepared by Mike Reichenbach Appendix C February. 1994 I, • • CITY OF TIGAR ) LOCAL WETLANDS INVENTORY WETLANDS FUNCTIONAL VALUES ASSESSMENT Prepared for: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Prepared by: Fishman Environmental Services Consultants in Ecology and Natural Resource Assessment Project Manager: Christie Galen 434 Northwest Sixth Avenue, Suite 304 Portland, Oregon 97204-3600 FES 94043 December 1994 Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory - Offsite Option WETLAND SUMMARY SHEET • UNIT: 3 WETLAND: B-5 Wetland Acreage: 8 Field Verified Date: 8/29/94 (3ac PFO, 5ac PEM) Location: Fanno Ck: SW Tiedeman to SW Tigard St. Beaverton Quadrangle T1S RIW Sec. 34/35 . Tax Map: Zoning: R-4.5 Aerial: NW NWI Classification: PEM, PFO, R WWHA Score: 64 Mapped Soils: 13 Cove SCL Hydrologic Basin: Fanno Creek Sub-basin: Fanno Creek Hydrologic Source/Comments: Fanno Creek Dominant Vegetation: Trees Shrubs Herbs/Emergents• Fraxinus latifolia Salix sp Phalaris arundinacea (scattered) Spiraea douglasii Solanum dulcamara Veronica americana Lemna sp. Boundary Information: distinct topographic break and fill dirt; vegetation changes to mowed lawns Buffer Information: Standard 25ft min. Comments: Fanno Creek, perennial stream with fringe wetlands; garbage can in creek at Tigard Street. Fishman Environmental Services . • • Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory - Offsite Option WETLAND SUMMARY SHEET UNIT: 5 WETLAND: E-5 Wetland Acreage: Stream Field Verified Date: 9/13/94 Location: Fanno Creek: SW Tiedeman to 99W Beaverton Quadrangle T2S R1W Sec. 2 Tax Map: Zoning: R-4.5, I-P, Park Aerial: NW + NE NWI Classification: R WWHA Score: 59 Mapped Soils: 13 Cove SCL Hydrologic Basin: Fanno Sub-basin: Fanno Creek Hydrologic Source/Comments: Fanno Creek • Dominant Vegetation: Trees Shrubs Herbs/Emergents Fraxinus latifolia (Rubes discolor) Salix sp. Populus trichocarpa Boundary Information: distinct topographic break; dominant vegetation changes to Himalayan. blackberry, big leaf maple, snowberry, Douglas fir, and Oregon white oak. Buffer Information: Standard 25 ft buffer; protect coniferous trees adjacent to wetland. Comments: Fanno Creek, perennial stream, without fringe wetlands; interspersion with upland coniferous woodland at Woodard Park. • Fishman Environmental Services • r • • Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory - Offiite Option WETLAND SUMMARY SHEET UNIT: 7 WETLAND: E-6 Wetland Acreage: 5.52 Field Verified Date: 9/13/94 ac PEM/1 ac POW) Location: Fanno Ck: SW Main St to SW Ash Ave. Beaverton Quadrangle T2S R1W Sec. 2 . Tax Map: 25102 AC Zoning: CBC Park Aerial: NE NWI Classification: POW, PEM, R • WWHA Score: 62 Mapped Soils: non-hydric Hydrologic Basin: Fanno Sub-basin: Fanno Creek Hydrologic Source/Comments: Fanno Creek Dominant Vegetation: Trees Shrubs Herbs/Emergents Fraxinus latifolia Salix sp Phalaris arundinacea Salix lasiandra Spiraea douglasi Juncus efusus (pockets of trees) Eleocharis sp. Echinochloa crusgalli Typha latifolia Boundary Information: vegetation changes from reed canarygrass to Himalayan blackberry, red hawthorn, and pine; and soil changes to fill material. Buffer Information: Standard 25 ft buffer: Comments: Fanno Creek and adjacent wetlands and ponds; provides wildlife habitat. Newly created irrigation pond and drainage swales and older vernal pond with islands; no paths. Fishman Environmental Services • • • Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory - Offsite Option WETLAND SUMMARY SHEET UNIT: 7 WETLAND: E9-13 Wetland Acreage: 17.11 Field Verified Date: 8/23/94 (=6 ac PFO/11 ac PEM) Location: Fanno Ck Park;west of SW Hall Blvd. Beaverton Quadrangle T2S R1W Sec. 2 Tax Map: 25102 AC, DB, DA Zoning: Park Aerial: NE NWI Classification: PFO, PEM WWHA Score: 75 Mapped Soils: non-hydric, 22 Huberly SL Hydrologic Basin: Fanno Sub-basin: Fanno Ck Hydrologic Source/Comments: Fanno Creek Dominant Vegetation: Trees Shrubs Herbs/Emergents Fraxinus latifolia Salix sp. Phalaris arundinacea Salix lasiandra Rosa sp. Populus trichocarpa Spiraea douglasi Cornus stolonifera Boundary Information: Vegetation changes from reed canarygrass to Himalayan blackberry and tall fescue. Distinct topographic break. Buffer Information: parts of buffer are forested with western red cedar, Douglas fir, Oregon white oak and ponderosa pine. Comments: Fanno Creek is a perennial stream with extensive wetlands and ponds. Very scenic and excellent wildlife habitat; paved trails; 50%-80% stream riparian cover; wood debris instream. Enhancement of vegetation in buffer needed; mowing and gravel fill should not be allowed on pond edge because it reduces wildlife values. • Fishman Environmental Services TIGARD LOCAL WETLANDS INVENTORY - FUNCTIONAL VALUES. Fishman Environmental Services 1994 UNIT Wetland PFO PSS PEM POW R WILD FISH LINK UNIQ WQ HYDR REC ED AEST 3 B-1 R M M M L L H H ' L M 3 B-2 1.0 2 1.5 H M H •L M H H L H 3 B-3 14.4 H M H L M H L L H 3 B-4 2.0 1.0 H M H L _ M H L L M 3 B-5 3.0 5.0 H M H L M H L L M 3 B-19 2.0 M M H L M H M L M • 3 B-20 0.1 M M M L L H H . L M 4 A-1 2.6. 0.2 H M H L M H •H L L 4 A-2 3.3 6.0 H M H L M H H LM 4 A-3 1.0 9.5 . H H H H M H H • H H 4 A-4 1.5 ML L L L M L LM 4 A-5 0.3 0.5 MM L L M H . M M M 4 A-7 0.34 H L M L M H L L L 4 A-8,9 0.5 2.0 4.0 H M H M M H H H H 4 A-10 1.08 R M L M L M H H L M 4 A-11 8.0 2.0 M L M L M H L LM 4 A-12, E-36 12.3 1.3 H L H L M H L LM 4 A-13 2.73 L L L L L M L L L • 4 A-14 0.28 H L H L L L L L H 4 B-17, E-35 1 1.4 H L H H L M M L H 4 E-34 4.72 H M H H M H H H H • 2 • Note: Acreage approximate; see text for.abbreviations (PFO is forested wetland, WILD is wildlife habitat, etc.) TIGARD LOCAL WETLANDS INVENTORY - FUNCTIONAL VALUES. Fishman Environmental Services 1994 UNIT Wetland PFO PSS PEM POW R WILD FISH LINK UNIQ WQ HYDR REC ED AEST 5 E-1-3 7.53 M M M L M H L L M 5 'E-4 1.19 M M M . L M H L L M 5 E-5 R H M M L L H L L M 6 C-15 0.19 H M M L L H L LM 6 E-26, 27 1.0 0.5 ML L L M H L L L • 6 E-28 1 1 1.0 H M L H H H L L H • 6 E-29 1.0 M M _ L L M H M L H 6 E-30 5.0 ML L H M H L M H 6 E-31-33 1.5 1.0 M M . L L M H L . L M 7 E-6 4.5 1.0 H H H L H H H M H 7 E-7,8 2.56 ML L L M H L LM 7 E-9-13 6 1 1 H H H L H H H H H 7 E-14-16,18-21,39 19 0.25 4.0 2.0 H H H H H H L L H 7 E-17 R H L M L L H L L M 7 E-22-25 1 2.0 H H H L H H L L H 7 E-37 0.25 0.25 M L M L M H L L L 7 E-38 0.5 ML L L M H L LM • 7 E-39 0.25 L L L L L L L L L 3 Note: Acreage approximate; see text for abbreviations (PFO is forested wetland, WILD is wildlife habitat, etc.) ��� '��f Y��� _ \�- °°� CITY OF TIGAHU s% \�_, WETLANDS INVENTORY �k et, a- VI, RR: Ro "-'� rail UNIT 3 S�NO\,` ,'- 11.0-4;014._a 1 , m Identified Wetlands .4� ��; • 4 : 2.• 1�1�1�■■■■ ■t I ■ A-1 . Wetland ID ill gig eniii MURIEr:.,i :`. ; :.:. 8-12..`11 II ._......... .. . .. 1.014107:%4Ate.'''' ii;"404444#,. 9::::;.;;_: :::::;;:...` ISI613 �� — — Aquatic Resource Unit 1 4 3::;:?>s �r�� Boundary lieu saw 4, '"� m0 rrrrr■� mi .�■:. ► ' ...■. .. ���► a�� ;:: :> ii 0 .' „ 1 , ■k•-.I.■II- ' ,. SNMY LN m ■•� ��.,, ■� . ■■ �,■` ��� � o _ ' Stream Corridor emei i��/G ; rIi■■■■■\ 111V1111= 1(44 x!11 :.. ''''X ®��� L. Wetlands e � � Now �0 ..14 IA_ 111111/ P 5-- 1111■ .. .i 1111.011 1 r •7.So rTA�t rlid 111111♦1111attl i■r■ 111114. 1'1 1 i� 8.-16 33+3a Public Land Survey log _Nee iI� V III ■� ri e`ie,,_�1 r i ...::::. �� 4 s Section IDs O1 iimemil l 1.: ■r1 �p2 �...,;;; .mss , • B, ■. �. ■ ■µ■ r��1 holm-I 1'I�It pjliIt.IiØiOhi ��LI:•1/.�.Y I.7- 11111.1011111 III pilligo I 1111 1111 11 # .-41161., Fr! ... Iv I - till 04;& IN iin - 1 El 1�'' �►"���: -. �_� . ,,� � � .■ jI Source: Scientific., r' .' tr.■ ■ r ■■ �IF _ - ""• ■ Fishman Environmental Services. Aerial . �: _1CC=� ` a �«1■� ■ _ 1 photography from April, 1994 at a "" . iai : i -, . =� �, nominal scale of 1" = 400'. f a k , m I. wn 21= dil �■1 Information on this map is o hiritimilrall141 =t ,/ 1 °Al_ -N= .�-; generalized nature. In all cases, actual Ifi ,=AIL �-� D'�1 field conditions determine wetland ,""111 '� �■ /MIN Ap N 3 �� ■� boundaries. .!fi;fi;IRl i -- .,`. _i- . ME�OpW s. """' �.�_ ■ ' Public Land Survey Information: All•!�: � .` ',= m,.. �� ��r�. \ • �� ��, Public land survey sections depicted or .,F . .._.� �� � �IMTP �® _ �,j;r �� � �' \ �'��'.__ this map survey are within either e t rlt I ■ r� ■11 ��, 1 T1 SR wa or T2SR1W.0 . IIII .... I OE" 4 II I I Wi4 z, '''..,%,*1144 � •'�s '' y' . 1''' ' I • 2 it J,...fr 1.11' '. izeo r Mil C �_��I�!!�",- '�� , , PLOT DA TE: 02/10/95 '11:11' .:'.:• m�� ` MEADOW 6T , ����� ■,- W /_ �i�� � 11111. ._ . >»:;: :> ::> = RI M Tu- ::d JIft_ `` CITY OF FoY\ akin �*4} �o.'�::,�;;; :- ,a ' E-5 ', " Identified Wetlands �y C E � br irmin loriti ���a�r (� A 1 Wetland D Ea 1111: _— , / �� • NZ/RIM IIi11IIiIIihIIIIIL - - c soure Unit ar,•�/ i 1111,,':'■1111 —::� ;4 _. Stream Corridor ...r —�� � III �J' \ .O ',T " " , Wetlands l 3�I.�4 Public Land Survey ■11111 �� i ♦ �� erection IDs 1111■ �� �„1 •�� !!! ► : A� ��� 1111 �.l A �,, .t i ■IIIi■ �1 1 11 ! ■I ..1 1,1 � ,�,� 4111.11- ■ _-, . 41*NNE ime..,. .a,p,-. #.. w-,1111, , .',,. ��•��'� .'� \w•, , ' 1 ■'� !1,x+,4.- $ :::_' v..1>I.•.',e `,l���`/������ � : .:�, , �— �.� � .,��. Source: Scientific Resources Inc end• �,�, 11■•■•ilairn.� , I sue. TT,1\ . 1 4,4 ��.�,.' Fishman Environmental Servia eat a eriai -_ �l ..� „ ■ �� 11 .A,�� .p photography from April, 199 S '' ��/� ,� aP �'�'l•.i2 •.�.•,,,-to nominal scale of 1” 400'. ', ��'��,��' i,_v. '! TOG�♦� Information on this map is of a •, 1111111111111 �y4 ■■■■■li■ 4 ��s g��, , a, ■ .orir P v 4-04Nivair.. ' field rcondidtionsudetermainlecwetlandctual ....away�>ta� _� ■■ ■� �, 1111,, ■ � ,' 1111 1 bdt ■■ ■rr��i I v■11 u �1 , ♦ i I�� * •� All,- ;'.■.. �, .'� 4 �� �c> �, ` Public Land Survey Information: All �A.. Fill = �� ' (� ���, Public land survey sections depicted on ,1111■1 ■ ',�� �;��'�" um a_lr� �•••• ,��,..,', r.�••��' ` 1111 this map survey are within either ire-,� '-11.-11■ rya 11.A T1SR1W or T2SR1W. ' �, , -- , . HILL VIEV ST `, ^,-T 1111 S/, == 11M i -■. .folk ' #11111111� - Lig,� „.T.. .._A -E► 16■■■ am a ■■■�� _ 11 �IORTH " ' nu ■ 7r, . S 11 - , „t �1 °” . Scale 1°:600. ,. _mill M IO or ■ i_ pI_ '��!o'�r . II—. _ FEET �� �� �, o 1 MI \ _ _ ©,[ ��• — P1 OT DATE. 02/10/95 . 3 � pz<,"• ' ' '\\\N ,4011‘• .i'� ` 7 '4 ' CITY OF TIGARD.41P / s s ♦ UNIT 7 \ J > / \ ■ .. E-6';.; iii,74 Identified Wetlands • 411 .....: .:,:•:. ... ..."i .. ...::::::,::..a. 4*. /''J -31 A-1 Wetland ID III \ ` \` ,, ,, / m"11 , _ - Aquatic Resource Unit f.7...^1.. ..1...)..:S-::.,1 1 Ek.7 1/4"-"-i_ e NAw ij *0 i. k',42,7::::......-...:,...:)...::s:.;:.I:.::,‘.:,.,u'.,.:.-:m.-::::.•::::e:::.::v.:.:.:::.:'::::,::.:.:k.-.:-:::-:..;..:::::::::E::::::*:::::.'::.:g:::‘zii:::... I Nu�j / /® .::: ■ f: "E-32 1d1 Boundary ? ....... :.:..". ' -` !```�;. , 1. Stream Corridor E 8 ,l. 1 t �il� � '► : 11: \ Iii a1111 Wetlands �, �,� • # r.' ,.al,i A :::::::::: >::;. 1\ LI RI_ 3 4 Public Land Survey .,. ♦Al' I ti' 11 N`>> \ \\ in NM Section IDs P \ \.>..,\ Ailli Ili.1 - l V k* 11111111C1111 t� • ��I 1 It .. s . N I �.■ 4111111 oillilinalpsi�'�• � \ ���uu��� Source: Scientific Resources Inc. • -tit p Aerial ,� � i � � "1 Fishman Environmental Services, am, , Ak�. ` . :� :E-21 -- photography from April, ervi at a I' ` //N� I �L ��� 1�i 11 L 1 . 1 : nominal scale of 1" _ 1, 19 ■� �` '�� ,: '2 Information e this.map is of a ■,. 1 „ �r i 0_, ,,..;•;.%:•••• _, ..`•� i • generalized nature. In all cases, actual 'I� �' �� . .j �` : ail �" �' ^Q��� ,poG field conditions determine wetland ,,, ■.a� ;,�' \.i 1111111,u �' _il „ , 'ti9 boundaries. �' MIM '� n ruldr,'�� © '� Public Land Survey Informaton: All .r kii —� �11 �o Public land survey sections depicted on 112— _ ., '" • teri �t' *�. ..••" • `? this map survey are within either Er■ r ■ • 't 11 11 f �. '� ;:: ".. " ■rte � �'• Li pilaw �° ,Ø!11R X11 °� r T1SR1W or T2SR1W. E"�t. € � ii...,,,_ tiff r •� i tf > � _ " �� ��� � � r����� _ ���]�' • NOR T N TWALITY ■ ■ t , In ��� } �. r� enno ,/ i ,;,o L Scale 1".600' l ■ LC -�-- FEE T .�.;. i JUNIOR ■ ■ � 1 �_ � �rQ HIGH •�t SCHOOL ■ ■ �� ■� \ L _ !LIRA 0 600 • �a \ — 't � 1200 - _. -_ _. =Mug I__,_.__BA __ eP N PLOT DATE: 02/10/95 -,.--:---'or::-''',1-.1....;;-.'''`..',1,1,-,-M.,'11 ,....t.,, -.••" -: .., -,,i...--ts:•.-„.':,'.,'I',....i--,.t,.....,,;-,,-;,,•,,,,-,..,,,,,..,_-,,,,,„,,,..--‘2.', - s , .• ,., ,„,,,,-„o:;„‘f-,,,.e,4,■;";-':::!:..-, -,,-,-,.. , .,,..i•,..,-, ,'--:- - • .4.1," •.....- '"i.,•""-"" ..",:"" 4', ...1%,..'".,..;',.'.,...• .r.,-*tr:'"'". -.1,4":".7 .:::::•,..,•;':(‘'Igl',',4,'''''• t''':,"•-!:'',:" i3'"- ,-,,' ":".;;"A. i. '' '' '' ' '.`•••',-:-"er'7A-..S!',. ',..";S•'.i..;;%-..:e;‘;';'..: '`''.3,1"•,`f,'..Y''''... :V•;-', .:1‘3`;.4 -5' '.1;';'^''1'1'1'..7•:!1•' ''-,r1'.''• i....s- ‘',! :',,>•'', 5.,, '''''"` . ."',-:' '-a' ' . '- " -'1"-1"'''...?''T'I' ..2.,"„".,h.,.,•„.`.;', -."1,:•.';`'' ', ..,,,,"-.)-:, , ,. :`,2-,'..."..,:. ,V:‘,F;i1;■:-..r.f,''''.•-':'''7`" ."'": '-'' 4>.".".1. ''' ':9- -..4:'::.--:';:',:':','-:$1 1.2"1:?:;;'''"1:*i • , _i:,,';•..:.,,g.,,,,,,,,, _:-;, -,,,,,-',. ;:f', „` 4 . ' '. '',',t,.-‘'.,'t -,**,-; ':*'• ;.'' 4:,,-',.! ` ,TZ, -2,"....-2;; ..,• -.7..,,,, ,-.-'....:4"-.7.;:,";-":'-'';;'::.!.;:.`' =: 4 -,--„. ,--, „ _,- -;--,-;,- , :,r - ..,-, ',- ',1: . ..„-- -...., .r.--, .-4, .r•-1,c-::-',---' - ' cs, i-.;,; .-„,,,-„,.,:-,-'- ' ---'- - -. ,-1-,.,:," '--'" s, :_,...„- - ,. , _,,,„„,,,, ,...,-.7,„.„,‘,.:....„---,„,...;-_, -.,-,..,,<-:, ,--..L. -.7-,,.., .,,:, ',. 7•.,_„,v..."•,' ,. -.,, • •;:',,,7.•''.:'' ' ' m' ‘*' -.3-"••,--'''''' ''..-'' '''' IL.-. ---.1-7'.2, '",-c*,..,4.:*..'"'',-",;'"t-,.:-!:',,,:,",„''"•,-,,--', ', ....• .i„, . -,- ,_ P-=-,-, ,a,..,,, .,, •r,,-. , „, ., a ,1;:?;J•,I,, ,.".-,L--- --•-..'";i's,,- 4..-4.7, -.- -': 1 •-:4',",,,',-,.1,.' '',, . ,'' ,,•.1 1'`'';'4.' ,'" -',.' -.-; k,.17 . ;- ' -I'.." -47!...,,..1',... 7;4,'''.'`.:"‘,i.' ,:',:-;-:1 ('';.71 I ., /1;4 i' -:: , ,.,,,..,`-''...."f- n17.:)',..7,'.;.--,:.":.1 1',',;'-'z'''--' ''''''.*'Z; ''' -." ` ''i *- *''1 • '.i '',"'„ I ..',.f ti,,1 1 __- - ---- r - -, -....,.,,,,-.., :i,,,,----... ,.. ,, : ..,.- .,,,,.."...,,::!,,,:.-.:-:-.,,,,, ::.--2,......Y.: _'.:"...:"'1:.., ,'' ..,.,i , , ,, „.„,...,;•,,,,t,,.T,.,,,j, ; ,, ,. L \‘;',_ _,'''S.‘[. ,., '..T.V-7T •-1'-: ‘..',.:., .7''',. ....•'‘,. „:':";:::"2.'''.".;?.:''''''''''-'7,':*,. '''',. .!'."* ''-- • ...'.'''''.' 7.'','''''''' *'..,, ''',{ %., s ' ‘. :.':'•::''';'''':*1;1*• t.‘' '' '' ' '' -' '--' ' --;,-'h N....•••,.1 :1 ',..1.*.! 7''''''' •''•., - ..c. •'.'7,".,".' '7.' ''';''"-- . /7. . ':.' *',.•,,, ", I, `- ' '.. ',.• '• --. ;„, „,'„,,_,.,_•„.....,.._... ......_ ....L.....,- --•-•."-E.. ,3-,:....,.„...,...2. , ..'- —- '.... = •' --- _,..._ ____-..............,-,.-_ '!.,,,` ;-, ,•, '-1_---s---'17- -..'.*7.'-'.----7.' :;'- _"' '' , -2... 7777:-77-77-7---77-1,-=--7"--- --7 :- ':,‘ '`' '"-:,' _-'s'-' '-------.-'. -.-. , .-, •'`: I;(...„;;;;4.-' - --- - i , ',- - „. •• .1 ..„ ..- - : ; -- '• ., ' •" - ---,.. ",. c ''..'" '_'., -.' -•.', -''‘''t,7,''' ,,'** * -./.._," "- -,. , ,_2.--2.,;"'-','',,'',q,..:' , ,: ' ' , • - i* , ".' *-'-, - ," "' *- %, • . "''' . - ', ',• , -,,' F, .. -"••-"-'''-'"'----7- --- t.'"''`7-7,, -, '‘• -2 . '': - , .- -7' '' ' ,, ." '.' ' , .. * , _*,:--'''-•-•-,."- _------' - .,,,„ t*, ',",-,' - , ,,, , , ' ,.. ' -7. ----"- ......, '''..,' 7, •.""' s'", F-;:: 1; t.7 -• -,--.--,•:: k' ,, -r• -• . : - ' ' .. '.- • •.: —'1-••••=•,.,.0' r-11 -;•• „ r:,--.-.,,'''f;, ., „ . ,F.....,_ - _ ,,,,,. --_,,,, 7,---7"7-, - ' .c__. .7.'- LI'.i..",,,'"*''''' , • - "" '' , ,•• ' '',.' r - ,,, , T.-. 1.7 pc'...,:: .• ..- I.,.-.....f ': - ' ;- '''.. t;:..:;"•'-e " I . " ' - ' - .` , •' .-`...i: 1..e'' e:-'-,' ' !---1-:: t_-"..•-1 ..a '"--"; - .,,,, ,,.,•.-2 p: Lz-''''"% '4,,r i •,:,.`-J. t1 ' . e,..',-.. ,, 1 , ,.. , -,, , ,, • •;/. '. .: \, At'' '' "1-1- _1 --, - 7, - r . _ ._ 7,,-,...„,•,;:,„".',..,,,";;,,, t,,•:: .."..' ' ,,- . , , • _ ' •,:, ,j.., ,`,,,_,,1,, - CI\ ..,./ ,,-*-1-7.7 _,•„;__. '---„,. ----- ;”--7-*,--,-`,'..----c -*".",-',:.•',"- .,.,,',... ,-- ': , , •.,.1-'..-7.i..' ''''. -. . ''' '-. ."•-'' '',,, '--... ;•' . ,ir,' :' ..',:.'•••-.'"7`.7.''C'''''..T.,,,,,,,.,_,-_.••...,- -----"":"'1777.7",::,,__"._ -,:,.... ''I,',,, ••,.' 2:,...?:„;"1,_ ..`',....... .,:,,•. ,..:•-'." '---`..":".. I --;--:.`:=.. ,-,-- ;I.:- , '.- - , ..- -,.., .-=-' '',,,-- : -. ----''''-,-- -.,-,-. , ,, ,,„.,-,-- .-,2 ,„ - - -.- ', ,', '- ' ',, ' ' ,V.,`-:(1.; 1--' . - - ' -` - , ---,. -,,' ."-.-: ' . -,. 1 , - ‘- '-',--S, ."'':- ' --- ---.' - :----.,=''...--`,"=:.-- _ --r..,0 -,: s",---:', :-‘',-/?'„,„ ; -- - ,„:.,- 4 . .-,..:, . ..- - ,= . -. .-- , ' - ,- . -.• ,,--,-,,...„ . -,,,.i ..„„, ,..,,,,--. , ,- , -..--....-.=„--;< -- . ..,.;.'... -....,,,.,.1-.:‘ ..... -- . -----,f '-, ,,,... ;, .-'.., ;---, :--- ': -, , -=,---, ,.. -,- - ,- ...,,, ... -, ......, ---- -7_,-.-C..---t- ./=--, .. ., --== : •-•,';',,- , ---'.,,---„, i--. , ,.- - --- --- -= . -- - ----.'-. ,- 'c'i----'t ..;;;,- -. - ,, ,-„-- --..-. -, - --; ..;...,-, , .,.. ,.,,, _,,,- -,,---, ---,- ,.---,,--. -' -''.-,,,,.;_.,...-."-.;-' ..,-;;- r--,...f-',..-- ,.' =,:-.'. - -',, = ',--: --,j,::-i.,- . ,_ -= ;,. , ' - -„ ,----. .„..-' ..-;- ;+,-l'i 5 ‘-`,‘•`T e ,-, .•'..=' ,,. -' ..`."--;:,•`. "',. ;-, :,:`1,.-.",:=1;-..t ' -- :_., , ,.., -; :'- ' - •, --. ,,;.. . ' -'' ' - r -. -; ' "'.1', ''':st.,-';",:_i'-:••' -..,•,-: : '',-•-,._: -.....: -:',..•„-'--..,,. ; ,. ' ? --'. - '."..-•:',., -:-...--.1... i:,1-,s,;;',, -‘,.-.'„ ' ;'-!:_-. ". - ' " ,,'-*, ', ,‘..V , •".:`'•,.7''':,'•'': ."-: "" ''''_-.:s'... ,■.' .V.,,,,- '1",..''?''..' ' ,1-",'' ••:` ,,',.... " -, '.. =; ,,, ` ' :c". '. --' '- '" „Z.",..1"..',..-1•,.- i ''' ''” -.-, '' ,■'' -; - ','',- ;:,. .--''....1 ;',• ,`. :, , _,- .';'•'; '''::'‘''''tr..'-'-•;,'-,.: ''.1.::.,'',.i1,cri.4 •,(,...4,.:4,1,,"ji,,,,,41 4,-.,,•",s', „, ......., ;.i..1, - ,',,,•., ••- '• ' •,,,,,,,fis .,,1•‘‘.. f":, .• -C . - c',;;-.•-•• ,.:,i.." ' ' -...., .`. ,,..„',-..''.",,,'....... „,..,-.„ t,.t. „,,::,..Z.....i,,i i„;.,•••,„"t:,,,••••_%t,t'i.ri, .7.',., , . .,.' -...,.,"•,,,.4.....„4"'-`,;. Y..,..-.. - .,:'...• . ,.”` -„ ---..-•-•„.",,`:: ,..".i.T.,' . ,'...- ''..,.• :1.s",-.'" ',:' ,-.: ; ,", '_1,----",-•=,';',',„.":."-:- -• • ' ---...4'---;•,..‘"„ .-"iv,,,,----f,-, ' t ' '' • ,.•,.`,. ":"'1-"---'. -",'-- .-•k - . •- '.; ..- --4 - -; 1.-', •" ---t:- - ' -,'. ' ---- 1, ..'' . .,...:•-•-•tz-.. --f-,^--'"-z -'-"- ' `,1-,-O-.:5-1,,",Z't,-+. <'.-, ,‘..,''',.".- " '.:',7,' • 6."3' ,.. -..'":•`44=•:"4-,i''•••!. ..'.... a.,' ': -- - '-, •','"---4., ,`.-" '". "^.., , , •,;' -•f ',-.'f" ''. - ' '';', .,,.2 '••:'---Iii)--t-s ,e- !!-',. -'. '‘'.''':..' 't--...,"]-, -;.•;.",.J.,1._;.--•''-,-"., -Y4-„v•-•,:i4,-;-•,‘ '''‘; ' - ', ;' - ."'.. ."x-: '''-• '---,--''.------■'.'' _ 7‘.- ,.. ,,.'', S-'-'-. ` 4 ' - 7.f;-'' -.f..".',2.,:••,., t-'''-zt ""-:-...,;,..-:'.,•,',"'''''2.1'..:.1,•:- ',,-1-.,-_- '..e,',7 ',1 .":-, ,-, '- ', - •r- ',.•,a-, t.'; ' •.i ' •, -- ":',", -., . 7," , ,.-'. :-.- - ,-I ,.;,,". ;-1.' -,1, -' 0.,..''• ..`.--.";''A'''•2--,4,,,-;,,P ; • -`', - -•-".,,... ; ,:..t. .-..-1,;:-".- , „,.--, , ' .' .' --', , . • -„,.•-, `..,''`...":-..".„t" ,'',--A'' ''1. ',.'-'7-''' •', ,..... ',''...„,,.,7.'".;-' -,,,,',,,•,,,a.is,, - , ''. ,'• .-:,,.,•,,,;-•_',.;';--, i.,----",.1.- 7,_•,•_„., ,,--....,_._. ,,,-., „'„ :, . _ • , ., ,t ,-...t ...;‘'...'„--„,-,-,:,., :‘...- '- ' '1-.' ,,,.• '...,.,t•-",..-,'- ..4 •.*',',7,- :•'.i''''C''-'1‘..17:','..- ' '''',•?",,*::^..,i,.S..,,,-•• '''.,-''.••". .... '-'......,:.- _,,,, - , i',... ,'' L---7,Z. ,..•:.‘. ‘,. , . '*7,°."'7_ * • . ' "--.. .: ,-.,-,., - - '• 1 -' .-i--.,".--..... '--',..f••-; ..-.1...§,.''- sair.•?...1.1`":.--:, ' ',.,• , -.._,•1 `',.. '' t"- ''-•-..7...:+.‘--, 1 - •":'---, :'- '"-- -i' ' ' , •-;" -, ,z....,'.:.-i'.-.- -"*; - -- '"'•.-.. :,i- ','-', .‘..., t ,'-i',,.. ,'"-, -•`.. ,, ,,4,,,,..1.2 ?‘.. ,...-,- ..,•,, ,..„7.,...!,, , ,.. ...,,:,_,,,.,;._.;..„.,...-,,,,,. . .=., .. .',...- . ... _-.s ••, ........' ' ' -..;,.,..,..:- ..-.. ,‘`...,v,.--, .1: ,....->>>. .".t, „ ,. •,.4 ,„s --‘■,.. .?..'1.:. -r-,,; ''t 4.:',,,:',11..''...,,-" '..''' -,-.,.• :.... ,,...•..".., .',..,7 st ."', , ,, .. . ' ' .."'-`"-'' 7 ,..'..... . ..7,.,..,,,Z,',,..., 2.,, ,' ■,,, 7.,..."),, .... .'7•...,.f.,..-' -.-"... ...'". .1 ,;',-', .7" , ",Z • .'' .'•,," • , .,'.'' = '-'-'1`. „t , .t. •:•;-; -...,,•., .,- ".`'.4:•,. :°, r -•■ ..„.•:■'•:,,•-.-;,,,C.;,,,,-,.:,,.,:".1.,;:•„.r.,1 '-'- •• "•1 "'S. - ".7 , • ---1,-"t e'.... •‘... .. .., •'-' • - ".'. - .. ,-.-,- " -'I, :.. ., ....,%",‘, '%•- -,,-, ..._ -f I•.,.;,:. :,.'....,'_,4„;::,, ,...%.0 A'...'s".. •''.', ''' , 4.2 I,:.. ....,„ ''..,"4.-' ' le ''.." , A i ,''..-•4 ' .!..•- A.4......... :-. :... " '', .":',.. ' ..• -I .' '...Ailri''' 4 'E.,.1:4.--ci:z.,,,, •:•"_„- -c---, .L.:7' .. ,.'. ., ,,.••••:::-,t.r.,-.4-' -•::.,,=: ,-. ,,: ;t-4,‘.-." 7. i '' '' -, .'''‘ '; " -''' `"' "7,-..P.:,-r,%,`-,,, ,.'. ,,„ -,'-,'-: ' ''`'' ,, , ;,. .,, -,;',-;:,„ ,':,";:' ,. . . ,`; . .7. . 1...-.,.: ..:,-;.:-....,, ..-..., 7 :F-,,,if -...-4'-,:'.-, 1 . ..... :..!..7 ,,. ., ,,..,' .`,,,,:i...,,;.`'`,.-‘1. ..,...•." ,' -;--...: ;- ....,';.!;-!.i'"" ',.,.....,,.:,,1...y.s:,,....; if...„-. ....„..7 , _,,, .-.:‘'.;..-7"IL,:• .1.,- , ,,-;:_ - .-.......; .',,...z. ' ,-,..- ,.:- .. - ",•'"1-'• •`-‘•'',"'',‘.,,',...Z. ::,--„,"-'-.-- ,.-•;--,.....'-`k,„- f.-... . •••,_ -,, 1_-,,, --,„,.,,,7„.,.....•,....f.,- , ..-- ••"- '.-- -,'-'.- ,,_ , ;-,-- -7, ' ,-,. ',' " -",-‘,•.-' ' .".4 5,1,..,, )' t' '." -' ',, .,-,, -,-°,.•--- •", ,-- " •;:.,-,r--..-- _ ...---,-,-. .1!„,•''.-,..:71., 1 7 '•"'7 , , -", "-;.', .. "" :7,-"4".7. :-,'=, 't`,.- -,"'" .'';-1 ,,- •;'„- ,, -%_. , .",'1.,, ;,„.„.:„.;!"04.: ,,,,, ,. ..;„,., -,.-, , • •_,,","„;., ,- .: , :7,", .,',.,,,,,,,.:,,.....!,-,,,,,J. "',,, ', , ,s•.1-",, ".."1,s,"„..,,,,' '-'- _,, .,., ..,_- .. - ,,':7„"' ',,'" 4",",',-;%: „---,.-, .•• ",:l_', ,..„, ,, .-„,, . , ' ,.''•-,,,,,",,,, -;,•, "":',..1:-,,,,..4,;,,-,i,. ,,,,:....,,.,j,„. •-,....,,,,,..,„..._,-,--,.,,,,.,,,_--,__-.„:. :„„ , !'..",,,,,,..,,_,7-7.-i _,e,""--, .- -. ,": •-. : '.?,,, -,. ;" '..', .r. .; ..--;;*.,..2--•''` ' -: -2 ',41'-.•:''. ". -.. ' " ' ' '•," ', ':-- , :,* ,.-.:'.'`-,,'':.'.••-:';:','-'•:'-s-`.:,:`, - = `..'----',,' - ‘•'"-, 1.`':-.'-'`i` ---,"'.:-':'4's4--'-...;!., "-..!•i-,.,..- -.s--. - •-,•;--_- -. ---• .',c,r•-..,•••, , ;.-, .. -. ,: -,-.,-.- • .-,,.: - - - ' I-. s''---:,- z• "..‘•,.-- - '.-',"•---'• -- ' • ' ." ...'•..--.,-,,,, ••.,% ,,-_..•..s :,41?-'t;.•---?-,r- - - . .. '•.: „ - . ". -,.... -, - -,- i •= - ':•• ' -, .',,- .` ---': ''.e.--:---C-1`..,h:1?,`',':-....,Y'''-' -=-,..- ,'• _,- .-,'• - -, -'%-•,.-, - ,'=. ,- '• .-", ' •--I'. ''..-'4,:".'1,,:-,--P.S. 7.' '-' '- '-' - 1 - -- '• - : 1.'' ',...cr '''s-.--•' •, .,. .....,: -,,_,.,..•,,'; ,-'...:',, ,-,„-,• ..- - -.. ''' . - --. -„ -.- , -- - -,-,',,,..; : ,t. •,. -,;;.,-;._.--,.s)...!..,..1:1.-,.; , . , ••,. -„. ,• , .....:- _, ,.,, .,‘ -,, ,%-,•--:1:,,,, •-•. _,_ .-, _•-,... -..'- . ;:;..' :4-;•..,:.•''-'. .6-:. ,t-', ',-...s:',:...-,:-..„:, , ;,„I,' Y...-- '; ""` ,',', •-**•.,•"_",r ., ,-.:" ,- ..),`;'+"=‘,""-,"1,1 _:,:'....,f,!:, s.,,,,... •.:-.' .:''', ''.',%...`,-, ''..:'''*.: '''*.'”7-.7,'2.‘4'..-*---'1"7* .. -' ,;,,,',1 ,:,.i•Il :..7, .. ,'/, -:, "..:"-,,,..", ',,: - `',%,;..."7„=",2,' . ,'"i,„';'1„,, ,I,:,:',, , •, .., '''*. '.1 z,, ':.1',,,',...., -;,:'".**_.,'''.1`,, ,.-5 1-',":',...,-,/ -'"'",-c s•,-1.-..,•., 'L'-•.?<4 z'' .:-1'..!.-^--'•,':''''. ,r ,•- -;--- -.--= - ;, - :;;:- ''7 '2.'''. '-', ;,..rP...?•T-I.;:'...: . , 1..--• -•:--!':-,; ","e•'•,-:;.:-'',..%'.-.':',r -.'•,---V'.''.,•'..._. ,..,' ‘., '..7-.,'.:, . ,,, ,:_, . , •,,,,... _•,,," :` .r , ':, ' ''-_...,.. ,, •7 Z: :•,,„ ,:, '."-*- • ' '.''t "''-" ` • ,‘• -'- . , 14 -:';' . :•.,".''.',1-. ,-'..- • ,. • ' .'.'.":4•-:.,,,,-.-'7.•-.''' -::':::•...:••••••:,.-•,•-•V" ',-."5-`' %s ,..'":".i•.'.-,1, . t,"•,!...: ••=",'':.'''' .•..." `'_ .- ,..r:• '-,•:' ,;,',,,:,, -:', P.'-‘'','•;•''.,'.1'''..'-''''''' •..r•-:'," :,- ,-. ,....•• -.",.1'",: .-;,. ;•'f ,,.:"..;.,•,.' ,-" .=,,-„: i: ,:.,'i,--,,,, • _''f-j..,,...:.::_s-L,4......44:•,,.,t.f.,.1.•..,,' • .'-'..'`; %.'"."-:.: : -,- ‘-'',' , ,.7.-:--.,,.`;2.i F‘':. -. "+„--,.. !-i.-4.•7.'+:'''' ''..7. '.''„1,-,?.'..." ..,-,1::::,.•! • -.:-„,=-,, .,...s.,.. •,...---:.: -._, .„,..r.F,k;77'• .,_,..- .,,;e•S"--;,. -,.:: , '7''; -;,-;"i.--.1Ci'••"•`.•.,..'.,,..: ''" ; ‘ , -'f",'.. .-....., .='-. ....,,1-., . ____ ,... .,..,,.,",•:.',.`,1,.':',,.:-. , -.; .'.4',..,:"...j: ._•J ‘-',"•-•- -"--•' • -: - '4-- "'';',• '.•'''-,'•-'-k •-:,'. - ---t-,-•.- .,' . -•,--, '-••--' -.--.- .4'-''''' "i',-•1 -,‘....e.,..• - 1 ,,17:. '45,'.,'''.-. , • .'.a . .-.-,„...4,...•:',... "-.` '.,-,f..t..1.‘".•.''Q.•..."-;''' • ''.'•.1, .- " 1---+":F.:?= -1-;='-"•.. • :"..',`--;'•-.-,, (''2,,.--:-. -.-7---=7,-7:. 7'..77,7;:,.:.....",',::.‘;-.. ‘":-..::, ''...""''' ...'-Z. '`', s..: , .Y...2 .• '.:''';11:f4'''L"' ..`:--,•. •., •7 - 1 - ''..-•-•:- .=:-`''''';4.---Z",". '..i.: ."' ' ''':-':..■1," :':, r: ' 4''''''.".'■ .. 5 9 in'' .r'‘'''-. .-'7' .... ,.'-•...•"", '_'" ..:::',..-A*•*".••'''..k.•- '1''',, ;.='7';'_,.. - ..:„----...,,7,r,..• s.,•?. .."•S'..'7',- .. ', .. ` • "r.."':•-• ;,'; •,-1`o*"-S-''''.1, -,'‘•`'... •.;.• _,",f7j,',.,p, •.-.:1 '. ••,'-',...1:•''';',--...,"''''' . , , .!';', .*,i; •"'. 7e7^C,7 1%';'1.;1 •,. .7". .''.'-' ''''1-5 .r -e'r,••',.....'• ''',.....`-:.• *''..Y.,.,'-.7.,,,-;r-,;,'.. 'rie.•''3,, :1'''.%!•-•`'.:••'`•1...,';,..; ".'' ''1,4%" :;*"7‘,7.7--C,'.:1'.'..4),_ ',.,.,, :'..•: _:r..."•-c1, ," '1',':,"‘ ''''..• 'f'.....' .:!'.,14;";•"'''1.;;-. ''',.'•''3'...;''i'l.,`;::';:•-•'2•'''± •,-::.-',,../.^-.•.,L i...',C.'''',.',.z.,'-'4--,:,,vi,:,''.., ,,".i.--,"-‘,-".,;:-.,....t,.:.-:-.:-..",-.,,---':-'--_;:r.5- • -.7:-"-•,%-t,.'.; -,..-- „.-,--- s:-,„?,,t,•5i.,!t;”,•--'?„,i::: ,-,,•„, ,, ,•.., ;; • z.--I .7.,•„ ...,-,,.•:::-.,„.;,..-_,,.,.„„,.„--„‘-2,..,,.;„;,...-';.....:,:•-J,‘.t...:,:,,ti-i,:-.., ,,•,.-,._.,,,-.. .'.":,,,:,1-'4_4.=1.,-- -..; "..":-,_";.,;:."--;x;-.,;<.17,..,':: 1,',•:=,•'f',;,: ..70".,,,, '.'1,-,1„:: '..,'4,„,,;:::;.:-.7 i...?4',.:;,..;;;;T„,„., • '';-- .-i',.. •-,..: ...',, '-".''''-''.1' '--,',../7"1".!.....-1■••'.,..4.6.,,";',...,';',:.•:,"',z.Z .'-;;:";_'‘"...,,,.?„.:-._.,...... ...;._-_,,4,,,',1 '"0".. ,., 7 "- ".•'„. J :'.E..r. ..41. ',; ,:k-.-; _"'`t.•-,-,!-rt-,c,f-W•L1,:-_-."--'r--;"-jr-;,:::: ..:!..;*".;,,i';:;•,,"." ,:;'.-•; ''..,,`;' E -''--,, i...,'-'.:*'I ."---'... '',..--:. '':'-':,-'-•:. _ ,,i--.:„', .••-:4,','.',-•?;',-,-,:;',-:'-- 5...,..•,..,,,-,:=1---•'1__-...,t",,,I.''''''..../e.'%;;! ....,1...„,,,,,,i4v.,,,,_., _,, ,..-,., ,, ,,,,f_',1,`,' •'",.." -:,..•',''.. ,if,,'"-=•‘-'7.•':,.."'1'''..-1*-1.-..,e'2‘ --. 4 ' '';•.'; 1.*'-e'"'"•'-, •'''''''''' .4:.::,''.....;.'. 'r-;*"..'':i",.,f•--, '''.:J',''',.'•1'',..,,::•-I. '7''s*".',',''..1-•";',......It7.,s..."F,./.c-■.:'•..'5',..‘1t.•••?!'.'';-,::_,.,:-'....,,V4.e5,:,' ;... .,,,,,,* ,s.".- i.1 -', 1:2',...‘'''...";?•";;.),,..-1/;•,,..7.1c:` ........ ,,-.....,,-,:„.1.,....,.,.....,,....„.:..,„,...„.,.‘.. ...,.,„......,- ,,,4..4,1„,,,,,„.,..,„,„,.. .:,..„, , ..,-...,, :e ..-,, ,,...„....._, :„.. .,.„..., .,.....? , ,..: ,..,._,...:. : •--tr...` '',..''''.7,I 4.'""+1'• .•■•0"•r',4-•--'1'..'.r.,..;'',.-...".:".",•.t',. '•.' ‘'-',,.2".,-,',',',.. -'),...•;.'.:'.• •...':„.'4:03.i:;%..:`,'',' ;••■,.``,:,'1.42G.,A','='',-;•'.4,,..9':':.•'....,,,•I!,,'',.•,,;.-C%•• ,-•,•••,.•:.....;`,',., .''...-/:' ‘+''V-''',•V"•'•ti"' ,•,..,•.''' .;-,.-c;.','l''',:.•‘,=•::,;.:1,t',•'• •..,',7•, ''''•`.11':''''',-',,•':::..:..;''''t;,,,''.•,".11',.L':A.:1-:.:f',..".•......",!,•:.''::,:',.,?<--1-:-...,,,q...`"Y:4:••;',',?•',1' -•.•,L'4,71.1,',,1.z•,`a....,•)",.,2eYre 1.,i :..',.- -.4.' --, , -.. -,--..-..,.;--„, -,,,,:,,,,,!,,.....„21.:::-..-,:...4■32:--"f,••:,,r;:ti•:,:f..,,,44',.'ssi;-,r4=-•,-,*•••,),'i-,.^.71;:;.-:',-,q..--.-7:'.4.7.1',--.:;:%,1,,,':-.:.'5:-",..*:-.}",."';',...,V'<.,..•141'4,,,'.,%2-1-?,1,--z.-1:,-./.'"„, ),,-2 ---!•,:-,-.:,•-,.1--.,::;:.;::,--jr;;.1,•‹-i."....44ye. :,„t ...,, .....„:„ -,.,..,.., :,.., .f.,,,,..,..2,-;..,,__,s Al•,-,.,,%.,,,,,P,'„„.,„,,,,s;.;:s....,,,,,.,„;,:',1,71,'„i,4,,,,'-'„,,c,;.4...,:,„,:::,,,,,,,4-,,,,,,,z:,.7.;,',,,,,.i..%,',,-,`,,,,,,«,!,,,,,,,_4,,--,,„:•_,,,,':,,,,,,-.,-_,-,,,,:,4,,,,p,',,--„.1;,,,„■,.....,,s T-•.,"%?..:"i%-C,:-..7.1!:::';',-,,fr*'-'-,:.'-k".i.'••••.4-i/•••:;•%.:::::,-;.t•-;--"'"--.4.1i';-, ,,,c,'' •".--=''*-:',;-7L:v.,• •:.-.4":-;,..;-,-;r:•_;'",'",:;:1:..;;.;;;Z.:',Y-`, ".-1..`:`,V..:•••'-.L.1,"4,'' `;,'-'''....-s "-1.-4,. .::::`;`-'1.-::'--';,.41.•se7Y:14'-'.I`,..1';',;!::.-,SI-- ,?.z.,'4V-341'1•11.''., `\,---'•;;:i'"4 ti::,',:•I'gl'i'''''.::1;>:,',.',34.-*.;'---"=Y"'z'--'`-'`..''-1 ''- ...';,',..',-. ;-,,;-••-•.-:;':;:-,-,'"1'-',-;4;;;!,zr,-;;;37::„..;,•,:;i'.',,,,_,I.'';-.)':-'4,4.:,•:-.V:i4,2'.. `"...s.,,,•,„„;;..`?"..`,.:;;";',",7",;,".;'`,:'t.:.-ki;;:;;,..:4: "V".-*;i1',',Z."5-4,''''\'''''41-...'"Vg?-,' k'''''''''''''"i'''''''': - ..''''''''" .---.2:-,;:e".' ;,'c'''„,".."'r,- 4'4::4.,';,:lff r.4":411.-;,;`:,*/:Y;':..,'Ie,''.•?),,,:.,;'):'z,0 V;1,4!•;,...1,0";?.''';',..1'1.16-,11.7.-CiV;ir;sr.1.,.;':i.";:'41-G.:"ii''''''' ,, .,-I.-:--,,,..",.'',, ,'''''4,1';-•t1.%-.."''•re-C:';4-4'',":-..;,5.i.k.?4,5.1.- -,ilil:•'`,‘,4"-F,k‘'`'%,7I''?"4.1,s-..e.-'"*"'- ''' i..,:r--..1.-q-t?,.---..-',.!-.1",.):....;:*--,,,,......•;.11--!..,...-11/4., .., ,,,,w-,..,.-,-..;-6-14-4.. . • • • Acknowledgements The Fanno Creek Trail Study Project Advisory Committee (PAC) is: Duane Roberts City of Tigard Planning Greg Berry City of Tigard Engineering Dave Drescher Metro • Tom VanderPlaat Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) • Linda Lane Fans of Fanno Consultants: McKeever/Morris, Inc. Paul Morris Bob Cushman Steve Siddoway , , ‘? • • • . Table of Contents Introduction 1 Metropolitan Greenspaces 2 Fanno Creek Watershed Planning 2 Benefits of the Greenway and Trail 3 Preserve Sensitive Areas,Wetlands, and Habitat 3 Provide Passive Recreation Opportunities 3 Provide Pedestrian Access Throughout the Community 3 Existing Conditions of the Fanno Creek Corridor 5 Wetlands 5 Floodplain 5 Soils 6 Vegetation 6 Wildlife 6 Topography 6 Zoning 7 . Public Ownership 7 Trail Suitability 8 Wetlands 8 Floodplain 8 . Soils , 8 . Vegetation 9. Wildlife 9 Topography 9 Zoning 10 Trail Alignment and Access 11 Tiedeman Avenue to Grant Avenue 11 Grant Avenue to Main Street 12 Hall Boulevard to Bonita Road. 12 Bonita Road to Durham Road 14 Parking for Trail Users 15 Public Involvement 16 Trail Construction Methods and Cost Analysis 17 Hard Surface Trails 17 Boardwalks 18 Design and Construction Guidelines 19 Cost Estimate • 20 Greenway Acquisition 25 Maps Figure 1. Study Area Figure 2. Floodplain and Wetlands Figure 3. Soil Limitations Figure 4. Forested Natural Areas Figure 5. Zoning - Figure 6. Public Ownership Figure 7. Trail Suitability Map Figure 8. Proposed Trail Alignment: From Tiedeman Ave. to Main Street Figure 9. Proposed Trail Alignment: From Hall Blvd. to Bonita Road Figure 10. Proposed Trail Alignment: From Bonita Road to Durham Road Appendix • • Introduction . The City of Tigard's current greenway master plan, adopted in 1987, includes three main corridors. Chief among these, because it passes through the center of the city, is the Fanno Creek Greenway. This greenway includes the land that lies within the 100-year floodplain of Fanno Creek and its tributaries. By preserving the riparian areas of the creek the City "will retain and improve livability of the community and serve the leisure and aesthetic needs of city residents."' The greenway master plan calls for connecting trails through the entire greenway system. To date about 20% of the Fanno Creek trail system has been completed. However, these sections of trail are discontinuous and existing plans do not provide any direction for the location of future trail segments. The purpose of the present study is to map the route of the trail through the undeveloped portions of the greenway between Tiedeman Avenue and Main Street, and from Hall Boulevard to Durham Road (see Study Area Map, Figure 1). The study will also identify trail connections to neighborhoods, workplaces, schools and parks, and other trail systems or greenways. When completed, the trail will provide passive recreational opportunities and important pedestrian linkages through the community. Local residents will have a beautiful place to walk, jog, or bicycle for exercise and leisure or to commute to work and school. Ultimately,Tigard's Fanno Creek Greenway Trail will form part of an interconnected regional trail system, providing new, expanded recreational opportunities. Residents will have nearby access to a trail network where they can take a five-minute walk around their neighborhood or an all-day bike ride across the region through some of our most scenic natural areas. This project is also part of a larger effort to preserve water quality, riparian areas, wetlands, and fish and wildlife habitat; provide passive recreation opportunities; and develop a regional greenways and trails system. Metro and the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) understand the value of Fanno Creek, its wetlands, floodplain, vegetation and wildlife habitat, and are working on projects associated with the greenway. 1 City of Tigard Greenway Master Plan, 1987. Fanno Creek Trail Study Page 1 • • Benefits of the Greenway and Trail "There can be little doubt as to the importance of leisure and associated services to our individual lives, communities, economy and environment."3 The benefits of providing outdoor recreation opportunities such as the Fanno Creek Greenway and Trail are numerous. They include personal (health, stress management), social (community pride, family activities), economic (preventive health care, productive work force), and environmental (clean air and water, storm water management, noise reduction, wetlands preservation) benefits. Fanno Creek is one of the city's most significant natural resources. By establishing the Fanno Creek Greenway, the city will be able to protect the floodplain and associated wetlands of Fanno Creek. This, in turn will help preserve water quality, riparian areas, and fish and wildlife habitat. The trail system will provide recreation opportunities and important pedestrian linkages for the community and the metropolitan area. Preserve Sensitive Areas, Wetlands, and Habitat Establishing a Greenway along Fanno Creek will help to preserve critical wetlands, riparian zones, and fish and wildlife habitat within the city. It is important to remember that nearly two-thirds of the Greenway study area is wetlands. Such wetlands serve as recharge areas for local aquifers, filter runoff headed for the stream, and provide important food and nesting habitat for waterfowl and other wildlife. Provide Passive Recreation Opportunities People love to walk,jog,bicycle, and enjoy the beauty of nature. In fact, the Oregon Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) states that the predominant outdoor recreation activity in the region (Region 7), including the Tigard area, is hiking and walking. Forty three percent of the residents within the region participate in hiking and walking for recreation. Based on the current population of the City of Tigard, this would suggest that over 15,500 city residents currently participate in hiking and walking for recreation. And that number is expected to increase by 12% annually. The existing availability of recreational trails in Tigard is well below this demand, leaving a great need for additional trails. Provide Pedestrian Access Throughout the Community - Pedestrian linkages are often overlooked in the fabric of a city. However, pedestrian access can be • the lifeblood of a city, and should be treated as a primary alternative means of transportation. A 3 The Parks and Recreation Federation of Ontario. The Benefits of Parks and Recreation a Catalogue, 1992. Fanno Creek Trail Study Page 3 • Existing Conditions of the Fanno Creek Corridor In determining the best alignment for the trail, this study considered several environmental factors such as wetlands, floodplain, soils, vegetation, wildlife, and topography. Other factors, which do not necessarily affect alignment,but are useful when looking at neighborhood connections and the cost of land acquisition, include zoning and public ownership. Wetlands In 1994, the City of Tigard updated their existing wetlands inventory to include a wetland functions and values assessment. The majority of wetlands that were inventoried are closely associated with Fanno Creek and its tributaries, and tend to be limited to the floodplain (see Floodplain & Wetlands Map, Figure 2). Between Tiedeman Avenue and Main Street, wetlands are located along Derry Dell and Fanno Creeks. Wetlands in this area "provide four important functions: wildlife habitat; aesthetic quality, water quality and hydrologic control."4 Uplands along Fanno Creek provide food, water and cover for a variety of wildlife species. Some of the best functioning wetlands within the city are located between Hall Boulevard and Bonita Road. This is due to their large size, adjacent undeveloped uplands, and large mixed deciduous/coniferous woodlands which provide wildlife habitat and aesthetic quality. Wetlands located along the creek between Bonita and Durham Roads "may have the greatest development pressure within the city due to the available open space and industrial zoning."5 All of the wetlands located within the study area provide, or have the ability to provide, several valuable functions. Foremost among these may be their ability to store floodwaters and reduce peak storm flows. As has been experienced recently by residents and business owners located within the vicinity of the creek, anything that can be done to protect the function of these wetlands would be beneficial. Certainly one way to do this is by protecting these wetlands and making them part of the Fanno Creek Greenway. Floodplain In 1978, the Federal Emergency Management Agency identified the floodplain associated with Fanno Creek and its tributaries (see Floodplain & Wetlands Map, Figure 2). Within the study area, the 100-year flood elevation was determined to be at the following approximate elevations 4 Fishman Environmental Services. City of Tigard, Local Wetlands Inventory, Wetlands Functional Value Assessment, 1994. 5 Fishman Environmental Services. City of Tigard, Local Wetlands Inventory, Wetlands Functional Value Assessment, 1994. Fanno Creek Trail Study Page 5 floodplain. Elevation changes can be found at the edges the creek where downcutting has occurred as a result of increased urbanization, loss of wetlands and floodplain, and other changes within the watershed. Other noticeable elevation changes can be seen in old meanders and oxbows, at the edges of the floodplain and where fill has been placed.to elevate adjacent industrial, commercial and residential uses. Zoning " Land along the Fanno Creek corridor, within the study area, includes three general designations: residential, industrial and commercial (see Zoning Map, Figure 5). Between Tiedeman Avenue and Main Street, the northwesterly section of the corridor runs through low density residential zones. In the southeastern portion of this segment,the creek acts as a divider, with industrial uses to the north, low and medium density residential uses to the south, and a small commercial area located near Highway 99W and Main Street. Between Hall Boulevard and Durham Road the creek again acts as a division between zones. The area to the east of the corridor has been designated industrial, while lands to the west are zoned medium(directly adjacent to the creek) and low density residential. Because land uses vary greatly from one side of the creek to the other, a greenway, once established, will serve as a buffer between these uses and provide a connection between homes and businesses. Public Ownership Currently, the greenway is "defined with the same physical boundaries as the 100 year floodplain"7. Based upon this definition, the Fanno Creek Greenway, within the study area, encompasses approximately 150 acres. To date, approximately 25 acres or 17% of the greenway has been acquired by the city (see Public Ownership Map, Figure 6). The majority of these parcels, with the exception of Woodard Park and a quarter mile of trail east of Hall Boulevard, are undeveloped. 7 City of Tigard, Comprehensive Plan, 1992. Fanno Creek Trail Study Page 7 S . uses without overly expensive modifications. As was mentioned earlier, soils within the study area were mapped based upon their limitations for the construction of improved (hard surface) trails. Soils with "severe" limitations occur on steep slopes, tend to be highly erosive, and should be avoided whenever possible. Although trail construction is difficult it can be accomplished by incorporating proper construction techniques, including retaining walls and switch backs. . "Moderate" limitations occur where soils drain poorly and standing water is often a problem (the majority of the greenway). In these areas, grading the trail to drain water away from the alignment will be necessary. Soil conditions in areas of "slight" limitation are generally favorable to trail construction. The trail alignment should be located in these areas whenever possible. • Vegetation The city's current vegetation mapping is limited to forested natural areas. However, based upon observations and other studies, remnants of native vegetation do exist throughout the greenway. These remaining native plant communities are a valuable resource, not only because of their environmental benefits, but also the educational opportunity and link to the past. Native plants are slow to recover after disturbance. The location of the trail and its construction could have severe negative impacts if not done carefully. The vegetation can also impact the trail. Invasive and/or shallow rooted plants, requiring constant pruning or removal, and damaging the surface of the trail may exhaust maintenance budgets. Wherever possible the trail should be located in open areas where dense growth does not require extensive clearing. When siting the trail in forested areas, tree removal should be avoided and the trail should be located as far from the root zones of trees as possible. Wildlife Greenways are often the last remaining undeveloped areas within the urban environment. They provide corridors for wildlife, connecting differing habitats which are critical to the survival of many species. In order to provide this valuable function, greenway corridors need to be not only continuous but wide enough to provide a buffer between development and sensitive species. The trail should be sited to avoid any sensitive habitats, such as breeding, nesting and feeding areas, and to provide an adequate buffer between these activities. In situations where species are tolerant there may be an opportunity for observation and education. Topography The topography of the Fanno Creek Greenway poses little challenge for the location of a trail. As was mentioned earlier, the topography of the greenway is gentle with few significant changes in elevation. Where the trail does encounter major changes in elevation appropriate construction Fanno Creek Trail Study Page 9 • • Trail Alignment and Access The preferred and alternative trail alignments, and neighborhood connections were located using the Trail Suitability Map, aerial photography, and physical observation. By walking and viewing those sections of the floodplain where we had permission from property owners, we were able to make a preliminary determination where the trail alignment should be located. We then used the suitability mapping to either verify or adjust this preliminary alignment. In cases where we were not able to access the floodplain, the suitability map and aerial photographs were used to determine the trail location. Another factor considered when determining the most suitable location for the trail, was the limit of the greenway (floodplain) itself. By locating the trail within the floodplain, the potential exists for the trail to be covered by flood waters and impassable during certain periods of the year. Locating the trail outside of the floodplain would most likely increase the length of usable season. However, acquiring properties beyond the limits of the floodplain may not be feasible financially. Tiedeman Avenue to Grant Avenue Beginning at Tiedeman Avenue, the preferred trail alignment follows the north side of the creek, through an existing horse pasture, Woodard Park and several undeveloped parcels of industrial property to Grant Avenue (see Proposed Trail Alignment Map—From Tiedeman Ave. to Main Street, Figure 8). The north side was chosen because of the available space between the creek and existing.uses (residences to the south are very close to the creek), and the general openness of vegetation. In addition, no bridges would be needed for this alignment. No wetlands have been mapped along this section of the creek and conditions appear to be suitable for an asphalt surface. An existing neighborhood connection intersects the preferred route in Woodard Park. A new southerly connection has been proposed from.Walnut Street, along the east side of Derry Dell Creek, to Woodard Park. This trail could also tie into Johnson Street to the east and west. Two bridges would be necessary, one across Derry Dell Creek and the other across Fanno Creek. An asphalt path is recommended if wetlands along the creek are avoided. If property acquisition is limited to undevelopable areas, it may be necessary to utilize a boardwalk system. A connection to neighborhoods north of the greenway is shown along a currently unused street right-of-way, from Katherine Street to Tiedeman Avenue. This route is already being used by neighborhood children, probably as a short cut to Fowler Middle School, which is located west of Tiedeman. The existing path surface appears to be road base material requiring minimal base preparation for the construction of an asphalt trail. Fanno Creek Trail Study Page 11 • • • the trail should be coordinated with the design of the wetlands to decrease costs and possibly incorporate interpretive opportunities. Near the confluence of Fanno and Red Rock Creeks the alignment crosses wetlands and Red Rock Creek itself, then continues east to the edge of the floodplain. At this point the trail turns to the south, following the edge of the floodplain, until entering a large stand of trees. Within this forested area the alignment passes through stands of native Oregon White Oak, Western Red Cedar and Douglas Fir, providing a unique experience and interpretive opportunity not found anywhere else in the study area. The route, though still located in the floodplain, is at an elevation a few feet higher then adjacent wetlands, extending the length of usable season. The alignment exits the forest near the cul-de-sac at the north end of Milton Court and continues south, between the road and creek, to Bonita Road. This portion of the greenway is publicly owned and provides an opportunity for enhancement of the riparian corridor. An asphalt surface would be appropriate for the majority of the trail in this segment. Where the trail crosses existing wetlands, near Red Rock Creek, a boardwalk connecting to the proposed bridge would minimize impacts to the wetland and water quality. Due to the heavy volume of vehicular traffic, the pedestrian crossing at Hall Boulevard, in addition to signs and pavement markings, may require warning lights or a signal. At Bonita Road the crossing should be combined with pedestrian access to Milton Court, and include signs and pavement markings. Two neighborhood connections provide access to the preferred trail alignment from residential areas to the west of the creek. The first connection will tie to an existing neighborhood trail near Deeann Court, where it will cross the creek almost immediately before continuing in a northeasterly direction to the main trail. A bridge and boardwalks will be necessary to cross the creek and designated wetlands. A second neighborhood connection is located along Reiling Creek, a tributary to Fanno Creek. This connection follows the northern side of Reiling Creek to its confluence with Fanno Creek, where it then crosses the creek. It then continues to the east, following an existing right-of-way along.the northern side of Fanno Creek, before.tying into the main trail. It appears that an asphalt surface will be suitable for the majority of this connection, however, a boardwalk will be necessary where the trail crosses wetlands near the confluence of the two creek. _ Alternate alignments have been shown in two locations of this segment of the study area. The first connects to the preferred alignment about 400 feet from Hall Boulevard, where it crosses the creek Fanno Creek Trail Study Page 13 • . . parcels. The surface material along the existing right-of-way and a portion of the east-west connection would be asphalt. Boardwalks and a bridge would be necessary to link the remainder of the neighborhood connection with the main trail. Two alternative trail alignments have been identified for this segment of the greenway. The first would be located primarily on the west side of the creek and cross several parcels of publicly owned property. However, three additional bridges would be required, and much of the alignment crosses designated wetlands making boardwalks necessary. The second, also located on the west side of the creek, would travel north from Durham Road, along the slope behind existing residences. This route would require one less bridge than the preferred alignment, and reduce the need for boardwalks to cross wetlands. However, due to the grade of the slope, retaining walls may be necessary. - Parking for Trail Users The existing trail segments are used almost exclusively by local residents who live adjacent to the trail. This pattern is expected to continue as long as the trail provides only local connections. However, as the trail system expands, providing increased opportunities and access to other trails in the region, it is anticipated that people from outside the surrounding neighborhoods will require access to the trail. When the entire trail system is completed, it may be necessary to provide parking and trailhead facilities. These facilities should be located in areas where impacts to surrounding land uses and residents are minimized. Determining where and how large to construct these facilities at this time might result in parking lots that do not meet the needs of the users (too large or small,poor location). By waiting until the trail has been completed, it will be possible to determine user patterns and needs, and where potential opportunities might occur. Then facilities can be sited and designed which meet the needs of users and take advantage of the opportunities. These opportunities might include existing • parking lots at parks and public facilities, shared parking with private businesses (during non-peak hours), and street side parking in non-residential areas. Fanno Creek Trail Study Page 15 • Trail Construction Methods and Cost Analysis Because of the variety of conditions that will be encountered when constructing the Fanno Creek Trail, it will be necessary to use several trail surfaces. By incorporating proven design techniques, using appropriate materials (e.g., asphalt or concrete, boardwalks, etc.) and proper revegetation techniques, the trail will have minimal impact on the greenway. The opportunity exists to actually improve native plant habitats if invasive non-native plant species (Himalayan & Evergreen Blackberries, Reed Canary Grass, English Ivy, Scotch Broom, etc.) are removed during - construction. In addition, specialized construction equipment and methods, such as tire or timber mats for construction machinery to travel on, should also be used. Hard Surface Trails For much of the trail alignment we have recommended the use of an asphalt surface, similar to existing trails in the greenway. Hard surface trails should be 8 feet wide,the same as the existing trail, and meet all necessary ADA requirements. Trail surfaces should be constructed with a cross slope of 1 to 2 percent to provide adequate drainage and prevent puddling. The grade of the trail should not be elevated above the natural grade of the surrounding floodplain, as this may reduce flood capacity and redirect or impede the flow of flood waters. Several hard-surface alternatives exist for the construction of the trail, in addition to asphalt. These include soil cement, crushed stone, and concretes. The benefits and limitations of each of the surfaces are described below. Asphalt Asphalt is an ideal surface for the trail in many respects. It is a hard surface that accommodates nearly all potential trail uses. It provides an all-weather surface, does not erode, and requires little maintenance. On the other hand, it has a relatively high installation cost, is expensive to repair when repairs are needed, can crack during freeze/thaw.cycles, and heavy construction vehicles need access to the area where the trail is to be constructed. The cost of an asphalt trail is approximately $2 per square foot. The projected life of an asphalt trail is 7 to 15 years. Soil Cement Soil cement is a low-cost surface that is often used in areas where the cost of asphalt is prohibitive. Soil cement is a mixture of native soil and Portland cement that is mixed on site, spread and rolled into a dense surface with machinery. Results with this surface have been mixed. It can crack with 8 Rails-to-Trails Conservancy. Trails for the Twenty-First Century: Planning, Design, and Management Manual for Multi-Use Trails. Island Press, 1993. Fanno Creek Trail Study Page 17 In place of concrete footings, which require excavation and the use of equipment which can do a great deal of damage to the wetland, a variety of systems are now being used. In seasonally wet areas the boardwalk may rest on pre-cast concrete, Douglas fir logs, or recycled plastic lumber grade beams. Where the ground is too wet for grade beams, "pinned piles", a combination of galvanized pins and vertical posts, or two-inch-diameter steel pipe piles (eliminating the need for heavy pile-driving equipment) may be used. The boardwalk may also be supported on steel posts (resembling an auger) which are screwed into soft ground. Another method for supporting the boardwalk involves the use of"floats These may be similar to those used for traditional floating docks, or consist of recycled tires filled with Styrofoam and sealed with plastic. When using grade beams or a floating system, the boardwalk should be anchored wherever a potential of flooding exists. Depending upon the technique used, sections of the boardwalk can be preassembled off- site, further reducing disturbance of the wetland. Materials used for the construction of boardwalks have traditionally consisted of pressure-treated lumber. "However, conventional pressure-treated lumber may leach toxic chemicals into the wetland, killing fish and other wetland organisms"9. Alternatives include Douglas fir pressure- treated with ACZA, a non-leaching treatment, and recycled plastic lumber. In addition to eliminating the need for chemical treatment, plastic lumber increases the life of the trail structure and reduces maintenance costs. Design and Construction Guidelines In 1996, the Unified Sewerage Agency completed Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Management. These guidelines have since been adopted by the City of Tigard. One of the purposes of these standards is to protect sensitive areas, such as wetlands and streams, "which serve as water quality filtering systems, or otherwise function to improve the water quality of the storm and surface water system". One way of doing this it to protect or create a vegetated corridor that will act as a buffer between sensitive areas and human development or structures. This corridor must be a minimum of 25 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the boundaries of the sensitive area. Boundaries are defined as the edge of the wetland, or the top of the waterway bank along streams which are not defined as a wetland. Paved or gravel trails, with a maximum width of 8 feet, may encroach upon the vegetated corridor. However, the trail "may not be constructed closer than 10 feet from the boundary of the sensitive area, unless approved by the Agency or the City". If the trail does occur within the vegetated 9 Polly El Aidi. Innovations in Wetland Trail Construction, Landscape Architecture Magazine, Vol. 83, No. 7, 1993. Fanno Creek Trail Study . Page 19 O • Fanno Creek Trail Preliminary Cost Estimate Item and Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost L TIEDEMAN AVE.TO WOODARD PARK 1.Preferred Trail Alignment Asphalt Path: 8'wide 1,185 Lin.Feet 25.00 $ 29,625.00 3"thick on 4"gravel base, compacted subgrade Boardwalk: (none) - Lin.Feet 160.00 $ - Bridges: (none) - Each 25,000.00 $ - Site Clearing&Preparation 21,330 Sq.Feet 0.20 $ 4,266.00 Revegetation: 5'wide on both sides of trail 11,850 Sq.Feet 0.25 $ 2,962.50 Preferred Trail Subtotal $ 36,853.50 2.Neighborhood Connection Trails A.To Katherine St. Asphalt Path: 8'wide 595 Lin.Feet 25.00 $ 14,875.00 3"thick on 4"gravel base, compacted subgrade Boardwalk: (none) - Lin.Feet 160.00 $ - Bridges: (none) - Each 25,000.00 $ - Site Clearing&Preparation 10,710 Sq.Feet 0.20 $ 2,142.00 Revegetation: 5'wide on both sides of trail • 5,950 Sq.Feet 0.25 $ 1,487.50 Katherine St.Connection Subtotal $ 18,504.50 B.To Walnut St. Asphalt Path: 8'wide 900 Lin.Feet 25.00 $ 22,500.00 3"thick on 4"gravel base, compacted subgrade Boardwalk: 8'wide 250 Lin.Feet 160.00 $ 40,000.00 ACZA(Chemonite)-treated Doug Fir Log supported system with Bull-rail Bridges 1 Each 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 8'wide by 40'span,with abutments Designed,supplied,and installed Site Clearing&Preparation. 16,200 Sq.Feet 0.20 $ 3,240.00 Revegetation: 5'wide on both sides of trail 9,000 Sq.Feet 0.25 $ 2,250.00 Walnut St.Connection Subtotal $ 92,990.00 C.To Johnson St. Asphalt Path: 8'wide 115 Lin.Feet 25.00 $ 2,875.00 3"thick on 4"gravel base, compacted subgrade Boardwalk: 8'wide 100 Lin.Feet 160.00 $ 16,000.00 ACZA(Chemonite)-treated Doug Fir Log supported system with Bull-rail Bridges 1 Each 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 8'wide by 40'span,with abutments Designed,supplied,and installed Site Clearing&Preparation 2,070 Sq.Feet 0.20 $ 414.00 Revegetation: 5'wide on both sides of trail 1,150 Sq.Feet 0.25 $ 287.50 Johnson St.Connection Subtotal $ 44,576.50 iedemafi"'.veto;Wood"ai1L.k r f aL .} 2;9 p' 4.,- ;Y ..," V.. r*ift.',;Gra.u Tpta[A 'Z2I;8634.$ Fanno Creek Trail Study Page 21 • • Item and Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost IV.HALL BLVD.TO BONITA ROAD 1.Preferred Trail Alignment Asphalt Path: 8'wide 4,895 Lin.Feet 25.00 $ 122,375.00 3"thick on 4"gravel base, • compacted subgrade Boardwalk: 8'wide 365 Lin.Feet 160.00 $ 58,400.00 • ACZA(Chemonite)-treated Doug Fir Log supported system with Bull-rail Bridges 1 Each 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 8'wide by 40'span,with abutments Designed,supplied,and installed Site Clearing&Preparation 88,110 Sq.Feet 0.20 $ 17,622.00 Revegetation: 5'wide on both sides of trail 48,950 Sq.Feet 0.25 $ 12,237.50 Preferred Trail Subtotal $ 235,634.50 2.Neighborhood Connection Trails A.To DeeAnn Court Asphalt Path: 8'wide 40 Lin.Feet 25.00 $ 1,000.00 3"thick on 4"gravel base, compacted subgrade Boardwalk: 8'wide 375 Lin.Feet 160.00 $ 60.000.00 ACZA(Chemonite)-treated Doug Fir Log supported system with Bull-rail Bridges 1 Each 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 8'wide by 40'span,with abutments Designed,supplied,and installed Site Clearing&Preparation 720 Sq.Feet 0.20 $ 144.00 Revegetation: 5'wide on both sides of trail . 400 Sq.Feet 0.25 $ 100.00 DeeAnn Ct.Connection Subtotal $ 86,244.00 B.To Fanno Creek Drive(along ReIling Cr.) Asphalt Path: 8'wide 635 Lin.Feet 25.00 $ 60,000.00 3"thick on 4"gravel base, compacted subgrade • Boardwalk: 8'wide 200 Lin.Feet 160.00 $ 32,000.00 ACZA(Chemonite)-treated Doug Fir Log supported system with Bull-rail • Bridges 1 Each 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 8'wide by 40'span,with abutments • Designed,supplied,and installed Site Clearing&Preparation 11,430 Sq.Feet 0.20 $ 2,286.00 Revegetation: 5'wide on both sides of trail 6,350 Sq.Feet 0.25 $ 1,587.50 Fanno Cr.Drive Connection Subtotal $ --29236150-- — �T .,T ;741 Ir ta-Bo;,ta Rba•Total y$s 614 ��^ 04 p ,,:,:j',$TCbnlingency $' 36:001 • Fanno Creek Trail Study Page 23 • • • Greenway Acquisition Recently, the City of Tigard has contacted property owners along Fanno Creek and collected information on those who do and do not wish their land to be considered for potential greenway • trail acquisition. It is the established policy of the Metro Greenspaces program to acquire land from willing sellers, and the City of Tigard is placing great emphasis on the willing seller policy. Several methods to acquire and/or protect land within the floodplain may be used by the city and Metro. The first, and most common of these, is fee title acquisition, where the city or Metro purchases and gains to title an entire parcel or portion of a parcel. Another method, which has been used by the City of Tigard in the past,involves the transfer of ownership of that portion of the land owner's property which falls within the floodplain in exchange for a transfer of development rights to the remaining developable portion of the property. Easements may be used where transfer of title or purchase is not a viable option for acquisition. Access easements would allow for the construction of a trail and provide access across private property. However, this type of easement only allows access and does not provide any protection to the floodplain. Conservation easements allow the property owner and the lease holder to establish acceptable conditions which protect the resource in a way that is acceptable to both parties. These are generally used by government agencies, land trusts and other conservation organizations, and they can be written in ways that provide public access in the form of a trail or boardwalk. Even if the ownership of the property changes, the easement remains in place assuring the continued protection of the resource. Fanno Creek Trail Study Page 25 Proposed Trail AligiThient / From Bonita Road to Durham Road :/.-'f' - �4 saT=0-vTt' �i �I �l11,//�� ♦ c iY+� �yri.i 943^ t!'�,H� �, 171.k h t6 , } ` Y,-, }- ...• • ` Y s t?..----".! = �. Y� '- x�"",.' t J , �="•=t-- _ ,• r T ,i" :c. r4 t 11 ,0 �8 � r.p : -, ! s j„ . � Gyt 7: pf C� W vh F v � � _. e . - i t_ 5v0 ' ,. T&•, -.r -i. �";' '.-r .� 1 C , IS` 'i ' T 1�'^�,'' c T Y { C� ,L 1 77j 'i` tul --1 '' e.• "�a �y a`aa"�„-mi .i a >t.1' `:'�,':Fa;<•.� ,a r. 1 y=`y f. - t , rw":�`: 4., r s '',7.r 4 .... t 'i gr�4.1. �: 3.y iteS f.;11, , ,. 1 �� '•� �� � S`-''y� - �. s`T a-,F } H",;+ \'� �i,.:t'., n �k 1 a ' 1 p,'4,"3- x` � t J r• .)'i ( iz E �k�s. � M .; .� tr � � 37S7 S a r d z4Y ' \_ ..'_ . u. d ' o ¢ • S .., .,, fAt`1 10 >I 1 ' \ T� <- AMs i s%IV • J7 _-' r I. � .1�,t * .1A / �i; .; ;.. O d {' 4." ° ,,- • jr kj l fy. ..' ."! 1 , ' t . —_ .? T* ,.•r t . - ti 14 �i0 4 cif//_ki.t!� T°,: l9 ,y 'y ...1 t� J' �,. i' 4,,tt.® r' 3r' +l' ,.. V e114.1 try -(,4,1- oka'4: or--1 � ilh F 0110` E--r_..�. V. ,i.‘., a y-' - 4141.► AJ97 al¢ 11dA`1iiiike 3yi ''' $' r-: 1 --`'� ' _.• ` _r.F�-r ., ..-.. iiis�A -)... .. lik*I;voli = l'\�- IN�ti 1, V i:';. y' y- �t ' 1 pT' r l. t.., • aar� `_ _, e ,s. %'i�" �`',501,Sr' ` �-,,. :fir '- tq ry 0-,---- n:rim i''1.7.;„ • ::, . ' ,. ` .'' :„r� i3,,`'ry .'�.a�. `.w7 + -Ii1G 0)� .r' r i1 t':''-.1:A'4 •-+ �.-¢ 4 '. •. ,�, r,��.Y,r.�... '"t.idi- � 7 � {, . "t ?;..., . . k s m { .. , , } s 4G: fir. I 1 ary• , 7: 'F'el 1 rx- 4 , .. . ,..., ., .. ....„,_, ,...,.•.,. :,..„:„...„,..„....„„:,,,,,...„....•,..,,,,„ . •,....4, ,..,..,.-.......„..A,„!,.....„ ,..,........,......... , .-.:1,-,02.,,..-. .:7-.... . . „:„ --p,..: . . • i ';',' 't, -,;,v.:14,::-....., Y. �. * �y'r``?fir' 'r»�,r'•°,, �a��¢rly`' ' At fi : -1 y e — - r tWfi'z.. l-- %,.--,fi�r, //� _ = . Wetlands 4;,'-S : Preferred Trail Alig t'- , :.-.,,,,I. ",: ' r Alternate Trail Alignment -.: _' �< . 7.:.,Z, 4 Neighborhood Connection Trails A/Fanno Creek Tributaries Existing Trail Segments 41k)Greenway (Floodplain) MPublic Ownership /V Roads 500 0 500 Feet Parcels • —1 U�=' City of Tigard F anno Creek Trail Study Date: 2/7/97 • • Proposed Trail Alignment From Hall Blvd. to Bonita Road �\ '.. -� 4^ , ^`�. E SQ _ L-'tY::,,,,Y,�;'_; •t' •: ,� ."'.k. :I___: .• `\r_ \?.a ',.„..,,,,,'''.77:,5::71.-i'.''''.`rte: �'fi'i r ra , Z` -•� • 'tt0i..L. - •Y"' ,: f+�j mM J 2 r ,i � rtl .t!11, .; .,.:_.1.:y.f ,�....�,. '�"r'. t��.v ,-.-,.:1„('•'"-= • :� +''4�:_.. ;, r .d ..apt 1 — '. , 'K • Y ,- 2 JS: Ft p ti Ole 1t ( 1.,,I.:*'..,-..,.' + " '� 66 T '3` . . 1"vy '� F 't': y + '° } �, � ,ea, �1 � " `. D� ` � t .Y....'i ' f\1i y� �� ytleilir1 •4�� • ha4,a, .q> a• i; ► iy fir� . ` {C F'j c ' ' • „1.'.• t t: � , - rif" gf t� y,r.,, l? k, 5 L���r! :.W } ;"- t f •/F� � y ..-'.' ,-'1:-'78 2` Pr v� .N. '.4k a. ''ki ..z 4. `i.:— .1,:..14`4i. t. {—°?» • ).�. -..1 . , i. . +2m,,0 14 \‘'..%. A' y ":',-,.:iy tom + tO' , y -'-.a,u..+�; . \''''1,: s 1�"il7 - 04f'R 1';.1`011, . ,; 1 v-"v",4.2.s '�✓'''P. j. G,b.•`5+2t ' 'r_1441'''''4 ' .1 .' - �. �'f� ;7 �7, i �/ °i y �f�fi./ +i t}i€ 4., iyy� t • p f r M .', ; ti '4.:4:,'.',...-.� N- '.4:"4� "�0'y�1.� 2J�' Y V a �t• x,+ r.)Ii&i: +e!6 P � '' ve, 'F.d ,r : }>3 f i1 /� ,� Hi xJA�G� �Ji��� ery ai r t ta 'y'�4 t v X "� S '.: C =*'. v y.:yS' -L.1r :'-�:� ii}s,7, .'�. ``ii.4' � ,'34y;Ne; N, , b` 7-1t.i .":..1;' 'y' is ' '^"i' .,-4-.i ' S 1 J ;Sy." Z, . \1 •`"- ' �� r'' ..tf...--J. I� i�b. � �� 9gE�'.4- - �'i.�.t•3 'r':�`�. _7 \4: _• �; S- l� I^� 5 ' •�'' i �� ` ,' 'i � r• 1 a +- 4..S.: .?...7,..f.,%,.,',..-'4--N. P I,im ' 15'' 1... ..CF k1 -, _ . 4 „, ' ■� rfi p f � _ J i'4� ' 4- � G+! i 1 i se-74o tl ,ir« /11�#+1 1 4 t , f. f. i.Fl[ j ai �..;.. i'l ` 1 . Y + � k • tc , 9}l � .,� t ” � 3 N r • z 1 iy A 7�✓�fs �'•; 4e36 r . � ... ; ' `j. �� w }Fig / • � �17'� + ir4Li t4 3r!r di� ,GC':`,' . ,, r , , lava muiik ..... ..- . ,,.,,,..,,,,:fah,. ,� * ' , pr ; � r� j L � ' � �q 1 im'° t gi of� l- b �P `y . ��r v Till •n 4. . n $ aY1 =ice ji ?,.4-3r a1p' d �f7 " egg 2 1.1 ;•,t . ��� k . ta- 'a' `qv` 'a f Cy fi. .. +w r_ „ ., ,1 -'. �� ��t So� o T: .7,,,-.1.-'=---_..-'n'.--L'LL .-Cir:* Z''''_ ' '(".fill°1, � g +�'!', �" i� tom' & ;'..C.'-'• '�'"` � ..�;c: °�' .� _! " . _ Wetlands A/Preferred Trail Alignment Alternate Trail Alignment Neighborhood Connection Trails A/Fanno Creek A/ Tributaries il_k A/ Existing Trail Segments Greenway (Floodplain) Public Ownership `\/Roads • 500 0 500 Feet I Parcels _' _ City of Tigard r Fanno Creek Trail Study _; , =' Date: 2/7/97 •Pro osed Trail Aligr?ment p • From Tiedeman Ave. to Main Street F}F.�.. �� �y,A. .,lit,,,,:-,-. P! _� .4 iyd.� i!. *� ... .i,- "��„Y •7�sa }tom,-.'..,I�.�—fir. !e 3ti=��tMtL r ,$ior .y a •� t, :.• a :'C f :*z.p�, d�j ,,ty - 75,•M�. ,, ,.�fi1 a;�' $.:m�,� yr.,.. '�\ 'ri, eve : •"�i. -r.:• °i 5 � �ar5if Y.4. , e/ tl aT;-",;L�..3! � ;' .. i`?''. ,;• ,ar. "� c... ia'- r 1j-'.y '�':w� Jay i1P4i<f,r..= t0��� " R� ..„7.7•':%'.., tt 1 s- ft '1 '`ax.. u� '• ,'',w• ._.�.I `fj,•F,c. Are:;, �, � s'� µms, �,�� ��� � �� _. :rt( y - .'^Yl Fi�A1t•�t.^f'a ��' d '' �E f_ it, BL. r.4.tt,s'LL r _1 !.v y: 1 .` mo�o.. ! s^ r•�!!."�Eil.-: "'+" ar,yM4 F 4,ii O ri o.,, •�a.� e s r �.� ft:; ';/ - i t �� Fs. ;,.:;L�ynesrr: n�°4. �. l4rle� i- ii .: [, .,-;s10,, , .: _ -ate, ;; �. t - A rc► g,,, - ,� jv� , a,4.' j. gym . ”- "„ +2 `"�. x � '4 t>h _ - '' ., 9 ' - ; : ``tie °�. ¢ �, � _ k Ywlfr�' q Q _ '��\ y�� 1 ^ $ s I; -1 ''sfD� s S1 1,:?-f--- c`.• 3p �1,N, `:�.j/ .� Sr ,"'',,I•I,LO fi,it?,4..;2,,4111..,....;i,..7'x,.,,1...75 = ';'•41-.=-777. -' ,....:274-- iii..=;-..—.40-,,T1 I w.ii 7.,f,4,41 :: ' ,..1,. ly1"-u,. /,.tt..,16,,-. #1,-. 1 1 • ..- .•:- v.‘.v.-',._ -7-.,.•.„..;..40;t0.1'.. -,,, . yy.,q,e77-"- eI *!. 71R l.,.0,4,,„->,' 7- `1 i lot r . r � r • ri ii� it&. ` ,. : • , , , P e�� � I a ` ,rue , Y i.. ' ' N t .,' / �7 k* ,, t ��'.:.+ ' r, . l'�\� 0i +,i n r a � , .'N ' 4 i , 'f r Y S � ^ . . as Wetlands Preferred Trail Alignment • Alternate Trail Alignment Neighborhood Connection Trails ' A/Fanno Creek A/ Tributaries (A) . //V Existing Trail Segments Greenway (Floodplain) .\��� Public Ownership 500 0 500 Feet Roads '''''61§... ji Parcels City of Tigard Ivr�a • dik_ Fanno Creek Trail Study 2/7/ 7 • • Public Ownership . . , , i , /-\\--„,/ . -----Z ■ I y\--- 1,---- PA: ---- • if' .2,-.. 7.) , _ IL H.i ' ---0-',---41,L./ 5\-/ i ' .' c ■'' c-/ \' ,< , (', . --"-).'‘y ,\ .,-//1. ..: --' ',,'‘,-.;, ; „ '• ..' ',-- ; '.: ;,- / ---- ,,, ‘, , ,,/ / i -,,, s ,,,,, / \ , .(.‘.,,-,' , I L--i, , / x' 7 \ [.-);,,, ,,-:>: ,:., ,----., ,',".•;-(,-t).):=.--;KNI. ---,-,-- : . -Li -:,, ', I : 1,..1\7-:''''',..- '' -1:-.-. ‘_. i 'CP-(\.. ''/:', \ \<<0=,- i-o, , ti- --, i, )1 , rbk Ei—,; \----i , ,, \-;'111 1 • , ,, .... 1 . „, Eli:: ti j1-- A_II i \ ---] ---Al ,,,, \\ • I, --, \ \\ \\-<, \ *- McDonakLa. I ii -e l ' :`,. `.).):. \ '., lea Mid W.II''.-1 ---7-----....,77 * __\, isa IL r„„,,,,,,__to-•-, _ ., ,x, _,---_ err,•J,67-LA- f" - ,.. _ . ,_ , _ . , ,,-; ,„ ----„,„ ..„... , jn\-_,\/until-li ig \ \ , .__.\13 j i‘„,_ Qnilta_Rat:____ I .V-_-__{11___IL1 -= ti ‘.. I i ,- I c---11f--- •s:La • . .!1 --<,---' ME ---) Fa ---11-- ll 1-2 i mIll ■ .__ \ r ',11.- • c 1 -\\\ \ • li:0:Ili,, . )\, ) ) IL 1 6 •-____— IIM _ ,i 1 -,C. • J r—L-1 PR 1,, 1 ....= ./\ ,7 Fanno Creek --..---,Thim Tirmitim IA. JIDLIthaln_kd.1 1 h[ all • •• Tributaries Li- --,),„:// Existing Trail Segments \ ' Roads , i Parcels Public Ownershin r , 400 0 400 800 1200 Feet 144.*IMenla loc • ' .-7 City of Tigard . F „:„.•,_,„_,, . • • OPEN HOUSE RESPONSES October 23, 1996 Do you own land adjacent to Fanno Creek? yes 11 no 4 Which statement most closely describes your feeling about the Fanno Creek Greenway Trail Project? 1. I think its a great idea. I highly support the project. 6 2. I somewhat support the project. 8 3. I somewhat do not support the project. 1 4. I think its a bad idea. I do not support the project. 0 Written comments: We are very concerned about the wildlife in the area behind our house, specifically wood ducks, Heron, Merganser etc. These animals are very skittish around people and have an extremely limited habitat. Also the floodplain in our area is very wide and flat. Any path with most likely be under 3-4 feet of water 10-20 times each year. Establishment of a greenway should not affect the buildability of adjacent upland spaces. Our property indivisible. Make sure chain link fence to prevent break-ins, vandalism. No activity evenings and weekends. We deeded strip to City of Tigard when warehouse was built. Therefore you have authority to walk the property as required. I think the city should adopt a preservation policy along the creek and proposed trail so as to prevent damage to the creek and loss of greenway due to development. It would be great to make this suitable for both walking and biking. If it were also a bike trail, people would use it all the time for recreation and for commuting. This would cut down on concerns people have about being alone in the woods. And please don't mow it and plant grass! Leave the trees! All of them. I'm all for it if the price is right! Proceed as planned! The only flaw I can see it that the entire trail isn't in the plan. Bank erosion and low-land flooding problems exist in this area. I would favor the project on the south side of Fanno Creek only and would sell this portion of land. OPEN HOUSE RESPONSES December 9, 1996 Do you own land adjacent to Fanno Creek? yes 4 no 3 What do you like most about the proposed trail route? The main trail alignment. Approve of having a trail. Not directly concerned by owning property,but would like to see land acquirable. Judging from map, east side of creek seems better site for trail. Increased biking potential, alternative transportation route, we to enjoy Tigard's small remaining natural areas. I want a continuous trail system along the creek. Possibility of going through a forested area. Pulling together pieces to let me stay on the trail over longer distance. "Preservation." What do you like least about the proposed trail route? The neighborhood connection trail along the tributary that goes under walnut street. The map id not even close to reflecting where Fanno and this tributary meet. Must be cautious about damaging wetlands, either during construction or by trail itself. We need to limit access or opportunity for trail users to stray off trail. I do not like the idea of a trail cutting through my neighbor's horse pasture. Seems it would be cheaper to either go where the brush is on west side of creek or on existing road right of way. Alternated that run along houses. I don't like the proposed trail through the center of my land. Won't be a"year-around trail." Additional Comments: Please take a look at my back yard any time (whether I am home or not). The connection trail cannot happen in this area. Good luck-you're on the right track. I would very much like to see the Durham Road to Tualatin River(Cook park) section built. Could I get a copy of the plan area by Tiedeman and Woodward Park? • 1XREENWAY TRAIL PROJECT OCTOBER 7, 1996 PROJECT SUM MARY ` " R: '.3E The Fanno Creek Greenway Trail Study is a project currently x, underway in the City of Tigard to establish a greenway and 3 y ry g g y � 1� OPEN HOUSE trail system along Fanno Creek. The study considers ap- x Z ,,,,,,;',,->: , proximately 12,000 lineal feet of land along the Creek (see g Ns= reverse side for a map of the study area). Fanno Creek is one We Need your of the City's most significant natural resources, as it flows r right through the heart of the City. The greenway will protect Input! the floodplain and associated wetlands of Fanno Creek. This, , a r ,'3 in turn will help preserve water quality, riparian areas, and Wx WHr : x`,. fish and wildlife habitat. The trail system will provide recre- £041 ation opportunities and important pedestrian linkages in our Wednesday pp p p g a October 23 1996 community. tAti,-- Lig p.m. 6u S J 1?c Recently, the City has contacted the owners of flood land lo- .ted along Fanno Creek and has collected information on , WHERE: those who do and do not wish their land to be considered for 4' Tigard City Hall Orl ma potential greenway trail acquisition. It is the established policy Filf, Town Hall Room of the Greenspaces program to acquire land from willing sell- lit 13125 SW Hall noulevard pg ers. The City of Tigard is placing great emphasis on the will- � a and Ped ing seller policy. Anyone who owns land along Fanno Creek _ in the City of Tigard is especially encouraged to come and ,,,R4 learn more about the project. Your opinion counts! to,: Cone help us kick off the project aand give us your input. The study will consider environmental factors.such as topog- ,` your suggestions will help us raphy, soils, and vegetation when siting the trail. We will ' . select the best possible trail route V;' i Pg y also use the comments and suggestions we receive at the open ,- along 7anno Creek. ,, house to guide the trail alignment. Come and help us iden- „,s tify potential opportunities for the trail,as well as any hazard i'�' , areas you might be aware of. Help us identify important neigh- t . r ,7`'c a c '� M_ Y borhood connections that would make the trail system more ` _ � .. s accessible and useful for you. L R YS FUTURE OPPORTUN!TIES t ; 4' 7. *Al : P '‘'% The information we receive at this open house will be used to .,.. MA explore potential trail alignments along Fanno Creek. After - .oducing a preliminary design, we will hold another public p l open house in December. At the second open house,you will lial:1 !' - ! j '' be able to review the proposed layout, provide input, raise 'z 7�� '-' - j 4 concerns,ask questions for clarification,and express support `, ,. r 4 %,:;-,•= x,i z for the project. Your input will make a difference! r x�� �)tk 1 ` K z .� �z�` `fig r.Q' r • -1 el ANNO C lq E E 1K _:...,..-_,‘ R E E NWAY TRAIL PROJECT OCTOBER 23, 1996 •... .• :.,. `r ._- '' WELCOME TO THE O_ PEN HOUS__ E "-` `-'.4,.',-- �i;, - � • i Thank you for coming! We need your input to make this a successful project. ,A ` �.-a`2 '4,` a ,.; 1 . WHY IS THE CITY OF TIGARD DESIGNING A TRAIL ALONG FANNO` w CREEK? t::::;- *':.' Tigard's park master plan calls for the establishment of a greenway trail along the length of 4` j '14 ; ; Fanno Creek inside the city. About 20% of the greenway(the area within the floodplain)is .-,-,:‘,.:,....,,,,,-.3-,h 'YS':,1 'Yip' t=`� r^..,� �. - � � `in public ownership at present. Passage of the Greenspaces Bond Measure has provided T a YI7Ji(Yt tk 4° 3 • � �..,• _ funding to acquire additional flood land along the creek. r .- '' a " Presently, we are conducting a study that will map the route of a recreational trail through <� w u ' the greenway. When completed,the trail will provide recreational opportunities'and impor : �x �Xp • tant pedestrian linkages in our community. Local residents will have a beautiful,place to...,-.:,5,• walk,jog,or bicycle for exercise or leisure. Several short sections of trail already have been K ' . •,', f built along Fanno Creek. Our goal is to connect these isolated sections into a continuous..;A• - !k J -ii• trail system. - .. ., - sr--, s ? > Ultimately, Tigard's Fanno Creek Greenway Trail will form part of an interconnected re- °:r;` • 4Y' Y; t k'�`' g ional trail system,providing new, expanded recreational opportunities. Just imagine hav; h fx v ,�.� ing nearby access to a trail network where you can choose to take a five-minute walk around ,::;=,• _ your neighborhood or an all-day bike ride across the region through some of our most scenic ....., -`i' r 'natural areas. i; � •2. WHERE IS THE STUDY AREA FOR THE PROJECT? .�;J � '` rt _' r ,t 'The study area includes about 2 1/2 miles of land along Fanno Creek within-the City of � >� Ear�. ] � s i Tigard. The study area is divided into two sections. The first section is along Fanno:Creek from Tiedeman Ave. to Highway 99W. The second section runs along Fanno'Creek from .: y � } Hall Blvd. to Durham Rd. - `,�; - fi y x'' 3 WHAT IS HAPPENING AT THIS OPEN HOUSE? `:,,,.:., , ,, Fs• " We want to give you an opportunity to learn more about the Fanno Creek Greenway Trail-: ;, ''• , ;1 Project and give us input. This is your chance to ask questions,register comments, or make =:. s; # f.° - 3 - • suggestions. You will notice several displays around the room from various organizations., -. 4 The Unified Sewerage Agency(USA)can describe the relationship between this projectn'd. .;,, p, 6.: `� • their current efforts to control flooding and protect and enhance water quality in Fanno `` g.'' t�-e- 4,, Creek. METRO.is here to provide you with information about the link between this project;,-- ' ' ' il.? ;Y' v 1 and the Regional Trails & Greenways system. The Fans of Fanno can tell you how this ,,•• . . project will help their goal to preserve, protect, and enhance the natural resources of Fanno``', i CREEK• • RE E N wAY TRAIL PROJECT OCTOBER 23, 1996 f; � OPEN O U S E , r t ,, 4 ` RESPONSE FORM 4��4.;..;IL; ,_ .—Vint , Name: z , -,-. -x , Address: '$ Yo, '}+�',y "'�` o 3 �.yi'�1 k !f'9 � ', 74 � �<''t �-, Phone: 4 � .V y Do yo u own land adjacent to Fanno Creek? dyes ono ., tip Which statement most closely describes your feelings about the Fanno Creek Greenway Trail Project: (circle one) �� 1. I think it's a great idea. I highly support the project. x ; � ���� 2. I somewhat support the project. t �� 3. I somewhat do not support the project. -- .. `yy�� ry 4. I think it's a bad idea. I do not support the protect. ., rroce,,,.R 117,Sum,;"�'i e,`Z, ` 'qY .' xJ : Additional Comments: , ,£h may,-F^'k",9-, rQ Y v. a n . w mss^ e-`-z, n2$+Fw�T cY4x % ��e,,� ffi�r ,r? ': F de- F s • �"r 3'5VA'.... • • . . . , . s Iii, FANN0 CREEK 9REENWAY TRAIL STUDY DECEMBER 9, 1996 3 WELCOME TO THE OPEN -HOUSE '1,-,''' ',.74,i E; ,. . Thank you for coming! We need your input to make this a successful project. • . :a °� ° i7'z 1 WHAT IS HAPPENING AT THIS OPEN HOUSE? �: ' fi We want to give you an opportunity to review the proposed layout of the Fanno Creek Trail kz ; ' '' • _ � j and give us input. This is a chance for you to ask questions, register comments, or make suggestions. You will see several maps on display around the room. These maps represent G F'"f'z, information that was used to identify the most suitable location for the trail. Maps of x +,` ' :: 1 existing conditions include soils,wetlands, floodplain,topography, city ownership, and the ' � ,kit; existing trail system. These factors were combined to create the Trail Suitability Map,which ;x ...-E i '-: was used to evaluate potential trail alignments. The Proposed Trail Alignment Map is dis- -,'16,w''4<j r n : played for your review. You will notice that the proposed alignment includes a preferred "i.,q ZF4.E route as well as alternative routes. ©;Sk 9). r• il Or ' 2. WHY IS THE CITY OF TIGARD DESIGNING A TRAIL ALONG FANNO T; CREEK? ::: _ � 3 Tigard's park master plan calls for the establishment of a greenway trail along the length of • Fanno Creek inside the city. To date about 20% of the trail system has been completed, , .1:`' '• .• :".7%‘...7.,-,• 1 however,these sections are discontinuous and existing plans do not provide any direction for - the location of future trail segments. _. �;,£1„ , .'k• Presently, we are conducting a study that will map the route of a recreational trail through = the greenway. When completed,the trail will provide recreational opportunities and impor- ' , ,; :-.,--• -. -- ' tant pedestrian linkages in our community. Local residents will have a beautiful place to } 7 :;,..22....f",;1.4.11' walk,jog,or bicycle for exercise or leisure. - .;3 ,_.�.- ,r Ultimately, Tigard's Fanno Creek Trail will form part of an interconnected regional trail __. x : system, providing new, expanded recreational opportunities. Just imagine havingnearby:�: , i�f� zs t. y access to a trail network where you can choose to take afive-minute Walk around your -.*4•. :3x neighborhood or an all-day bike ride across the region through some of our most scenic '' fy w natural areas. , ' ;. �"7:dyr ti4- 3. WHERE IS THE STUDY AREA FOR THE PROJECT? - _::' -. ,�;___. z h The study area includes about 2 1/2 miles of land along Fanno Creek within the City of, ,X . >x g study ng _..:.:. , , .� ;.��� Tigard. The stud area is divided into two sections. The first section is along Fanno Creek • s• f :'&,' . ' from Tiedeman Avenue to Highway 99W,and the second runs from Hall Boulevard to Durham] 5 < Road. ::`:-•- .• ,, _..... , • • . .., , CREEK TRAIL EENwAY 9, 996 BER , .. A \. , DECEM • , ,.•,,•,:rz-zTW''';,7"1 OPEN H 0 U S E _ ,......, .. - .,,,,....7„.... ,, -:,-r-,.,'.5,1e.,-.,',.-4,..!,:t,,,'',,-,-.,,:',,,<;.;•,'!.-,;,• - k74.,5v1- R ES PONS E FORM c Ce,' c•'..,,,,• ••••",‘•••••• •,".'Os. ••^ ,•k•,..,••••••••':.;••,••,•• •••••• • ••",• .- .4 ' '4" --,. ••,•. . ..„.'.,.•,.. r,- s-, r- Name: ,,•,.‘„„.„,= ,,,-„„:`,-....-4,,,,t'", --4.;; : ,..t;'; ---,..'"A"''','•'''-''''',-•.--''' .I Address: q i .,,,- -,-*, :-,. ".s. ••,:.' j'. '' ,,"4'"Af ' ..,,•,,z ,4,,,,,,, ,, ,,t7s",7;',.`" 4 .,„,,,,,,,i•r","•ZZ>,/,"*".1.-" 4.4:' 1•.' '',,,%'''' ''''•tx-'4 Itto-- ..,\,-—,,,,.4.4. 4,..,.,'"'`,4I,,,' •..,7.0'..}4*",',.,al.*°`',. -'044--1 •••,,,, ..,,. * , %,•44:.'„*.,„,r4 A,,,44. .i'-•, Ta,I) y el 1,,. 1.,„ .,,, Phone: ..„„,r,,,,, .,- - 'i, ,,,, 4 :v f.1','">-',"'b's'x "),`','"'i ir,..,,,••fl yeS El no ,A,,, --. -.,;;;.„-, -,.,;,,„il. fl yes=....., .,-.:-.._4.p*,t„, ,• o Creek?adjacent to Fann land a D you own o 'L,'..',14;1.- .•'*".„ ''';',1• .-c„„;,,,,,,40,, ;4";,`,,k'c,,'"'.'"--,' :fi;t:fr„i4R-T3145•7 ,‘,1, •„„.',6,..,7•,,,1--4,q,4'.1..... ,ok:, ' .,, •,,,,,..• ,1.,:',74., As What do proposed . d frai 'I route? h o you like most about the prop ......,• „ „- „.„ ,-„,....,..-„A..„,......; vv_ 1......„„ , ......i..„, .....„,„,„ ,1•.•••'•'a-0•.,•.' VA"' ''*1£••1. •A' •,,,•.,." ,..,",,,,,,,,,,_V,.. ,•,• r•,••,,,,':,,,••4•:4 ••• •;'•••••2•‘,4••''',44.":.•‘1,-40..•'0,. .; .s.•'•—•'•i.el•tr'..L".• ••1 ;S-Z•r'• ,,",:•,,,,,V•t.+4' ••• .;:1 ,,•1 ..••■••, •••••• “,.S.•.4•:•*'•!" .0014. • ••"•• •• •,,,,.,,N,,..“„ .,..., N-..;,,, ' '1=•.,,",..Z.,,,,,,rvt.43,VA-.,,,,r' ..",' ' .:,,,1•Ps T''...';':'.^..,.,„1, 9 trail route. , ; . .-- ,.: about the proposed A, A,...... - ,..„. ,...,-,-....--- -..,- -,.k1.),"4-to,;14. like least abo „. What do you like "'•,• '`,4, •"..-... ,,4, ,,,,4N.,",-, '^.;" -'\ •'0. '•••,•' '14,t ••". -r k,-"',.., 1....p.,• ' • '....,r., ,..., , • „ , -1,'',..„.„,,,x,„3.-4 t„,,,• ..,, '"•,,j...,.,-...x ,,,,,t....,tz„., ,..'"'' '4.-tc:`, -n-!,•...e,,,z,;'". <,-, r, -."".:\ , ;,,,,,ts, ,,4.Of:„tt‘....•.' +CC:1•"..1';': % ] "%-•,,,,,, `4«,,,t, .,..'--..e-AfS M..tr,..., „,,,,1%,:.-eli,', „ °"4:.•"I'',Al 414'4,4,k,,,",.,-0,'.. .,,,Ii.,,,,,•'',' ., ,,.7 ,-A-41,„„, , , -fes.'-'..'.,•re=0,"•. 'fr.,- -. -...,.••,e•,..-,f',„, *- *,.' ,""'„„, -.4, `1,-"4, ,‘," 1 Comments: -..-,-- ,--..--,..A•,....-, Additional 1 , . - , n•• 0--'• ''., ',••; ns,',' e.;`'d•r-',.; $ 4.',f-•; V1.,;•,...,,,,t.0 ..., ";' <:.■ ,..45.&.`,..•1"i,-V.,(,. "=",",.,„...1.;,,,,i, .2.,.. 4 Or..e. ... ,4,,,,,....., t•4 ••".".9.•;', , ,-.'`. , ''.<•U,-•>4„,file P ,,--"i... . . "" P"'"-,---•,;›,1,-", • z ---i.,.•;r::: -...--,t:,,-;0:,\t,,,,:-3, . _ ,, , ... ••••■ - •-:•.-1 •cc.• •.` """-1,-7„ ° ^`,. ,,,., ::::• ":),".•;,,,-/•ut,..,,'„41$1,....,Zce, r , ,,.•,- - - ;....;,.• .--„,,'<z,x, ,...,....-- , • // I '.,../r\ 'trail Suitability Map p-*/---L_41' i--rgsk.s.\\\ 4--74,I , 1(LT,." ';...*•i•I-k`'k-;.-1..'.7.--..:-j i 1 7‘-7- *-fl i /.<7--7-"•--.•---:-,; l jI r / ---'11 . • - -., . , "dee:, 4,9_,---, ,--,,,, 72-----.....-.•,•›,-.„), /2;2, i . • 1 la-'. •To •,,., •, , ..,-- , , ) - _ „Tv,•,... -4,-.• --•-• ,/ or ,;,...\ T y / / , _,. . .. , ,..„, IFT- - , --;.,\--,..3.-_, ,,•••• • deri .„40:00*.\\\/ ` \r-o--,.. , ,-.. (., -.,5, . • 4#4. is;., <\\/ r- '. '.- y'. •T* ...../`! 1: k :Iv 4 4. " ‘`t•P. il /V/ • , • i pto r 44..74-,.4i ,, / ,;.ifiti 4414.....t \ [ . irs11".214pmv,V,....44 0, in iiir,_,.„\\ gooroa, a 3.32,L En mug WA \ ..., .-_ \u, r Jill .,.. .., .., zu,-......04.4, , ralk L__IL_J mar inut) \ KM !Ewa .1.; \\ 911 int / Mc Don. • 1 III litrin;t14 gam mig.mr-Trdr- -ir.r pi ‘\ to mu ,40;•. ,:., tin Immoral. k.-.. . /4 ‘. V , ,----------i It ----a-- -- iv904 --1-------, 7: f .,' vii.z:*, s, ,\sitifirr... .. .!I:- • --.. •1-• oc. ,,.... A.,..„40.\\ illogif.lerli we#\-oirt • 1 , , ., . p 4 .....41 v, ()MO. WC; la ',n • I/II MMII , ! r---- :...* ---- i Preferred Trail Alignment a".m Ea a a AO o r,t l.. Alternative Trail Alignment Eii e A' /N t lborhood Connection Trails — ,fi,i.z Z-- 111111.4.40 5!.WOMI. tl V j:, Fanno Creek lillAit..'Afr;:#471.1 lem tr• -titi;41%• •, \.,,= Tributaries j 112 ■ i. /\./ Existino Trail Seg,ments am gallUllIto,"%,-,-irej , .\ fill 40111111111111w 4) 4r,0 . , zr• ,.. ,_„..e , in mums ‘.. .. Roads mom?-........ . ar,lyP4-..•' ' ' . Parc,ls lan / Public Ownership r:o rt ,0,• '\P- k,c1 ,;„'\ iL) DIr_ba c1,1 "P4 4 i!,..I 4 1,1---± t rail Suitability Hioh Suitability F / , / ' i Medium Suitabiliry at...." ( I Low Suitability \ ....n f.../.\\ .--....,-,--.-...— .„ Ma= el City of Tigard „ . Fanno Creek Trail Study ....,........... ,•.,:. ... • • . . . •Public Ownship N ��. ..�►:(\\\_. r, :r: _L.- \,,,V, , \,.�.. .J . ..,,ter y14•* i•V:WA P 4-107.3,1 t ■- ..-i■ —13 74 Ilir ;, 4%-, ...* a",:t\. itip-w %4-4 •••,. so ,,e,,,ts 4 �S A 4„ • 7---7 co , .***. NV ,--. 1..; -v ‘s;: 1,■\\ 1 ____, i .. 0*<" 4A.:•swv6. iik\.\•,4, i.f: ItT4 $40 Nr*.rine Zig-ilirig, .4011.:audio MI r j I 1! }1 _L1_�m.. \ /��1LJ fin 1111 i \ IN BIN McDona I `r fN iiii— :� _ �� AL jr;■ i 7iiili�� nn_ J �\ 'emu n uuq nil=er:40'l ► 1.:. 1 %I1111mI ty i ra 1111, Ai,JS Ii!" Noir- - oi L_ lir) iir:me li, III I m 3..:i� III (4i-) . J III..,liti,.. III Ol } III X11111111111 i{1 ^I: Fanno Creek 1 Ducha ■ ;� 1` 7 - / A/ Tributaries '�\ ; Existing Trail Segments I /' Roads lfr Parcels . n Public Ownership 400 0 400 800 I200 Feet • City of Tigard M ; = ! 2/19/96 ' Fanno Creek Trail StudY A rn • . . .,.... . . . . . . . . ..... ..,..... .. ..: . 41) • , ,,, ,, Zoning f,-,4,, • ........, \\,,„,,R;,,,,..m.i,, 4,:,$:.4.dii . \.,,,\k.- A,MIM/Shows■\., `1,1 ci,1:1,ip „..,,;,,,„,..‘c,7,111,,,,vi N -■-,..tik.„-',;.,-t.-4,„:4•411,4tp ASP&, . itainerib,....11b1-.N..`%,.. /4,9* 4•■44VP .' • 1 i:Winh.%1 Mike A till,WRI II DirEat'P':■..t....*...PS.$*k hef. ,e/ ' i' ';. 1•••MIN rill&• • ,tdiemt ,.;•■%. ,, , 7 f,;: ,.:, am —id;a miff 1;,•*4 gt,•4.4.P.,,to 40, It\ - ', , p1* 0 u, .11■..„• 4:::,,,'.fw ‘.9. ,: ■••■, - , r v. f .44*,A,``",,,' ,14 ,,,,,,. .t •/,,, , - ---i.. 41,0*■ -(41. 4: Ap ,,,,,,A T.,.,,,,,,,,. ■ ,....3;;,:4,„ A v t\\ •sq.$,,,,Im' , r -,,. , k s-v-\4c,-;:el!,,,, 'too s,-„-.4.,./...-Nvt-,,,,, • \\ — .... •.,to-44,-, „„-iti i .er..,-,1,,, . fel 0 folais-41-vprri---4* \\ ■ limmimm...,..,,k.-voza,...7$ :., - .0,... NM maw tr.N,-,ytyip.44 \ ' VAIIIMIll mil );) more i.• -=.-.4 N. 4., ow mom Asa.c,0,14N4.1 \ III 511 In5V,,,V/7,N \ ,,,in McDona I 11 Ill yti.74,071Etrer■Lv,;,:-:;:,;:,,,,,.......k" ..).,..\....\ XL' lg,b7,„iiN''' 1.1.,,,igataLEIAC.441g.:*t.1,fyett,i1S lilli,\ A/Fanno Creek Tributaries la Wi4',,`,:eiYit ,,"1:,\'-",F,r;A:.J,■ 1147i4 -- A/Existing Trail Segments 1 11 '-":401re;P:iYi-"Illo-s,;',',,,rilkli isk TINT Roads ,,,,,,v ut,,,k.-...,,,-,/k,,c,,,),,,,kinii 1 x . • ' - 1,t;lrA -f-;i•vAii,,-.:Ipiri,r-51:1,„1?4 lor, ,-,,-, Parcels IIZoning 1 -1,../y2:,,,,i.,./ammo• i ne, ups =LI t, ., ;IIIIII Iti 1=111•rtigial C-G V`K411111/111 111: b 1111nial WI C-N = p 11r;.AmitIll Mil nu---.a, : -1MM Er li rittlgtlia.' ISai 17U1.',....;1.1,!no ti6t:11:3,-.4,,o,-,-',,i/;:„,,aii-ermat,„iit., COUN tsstp4,,,,,,, ,,,,,„,09.,,,/,.ounlio-N ..1-7 ., 0, ..p.1,,amov,Likii, ,4 _ I-H . q,c2.7,,,',,Ii/iFii'/Z,..4,34.2.4.,;fivilitijini F7-5tLnrr65kn,,,sf. /157' 12 :NAllill . ' d - ' I-L il'qt,T3',...3,,..'3 N 1331.1e L ,,I.A,ow 3,,• v. , . 1 .• , 1 I-P , aPt... :4,,,,,,t.),R..ele70. ."..... r• ',.:46 f■-•,..., ' ,‘?.,„-J 1 R-I '".4.2'/ri';‘;1'W,1,::'' ''.,;_A=``p'i4:11tiktgl , 1,,,,t/ ... 1p -.,...4 R-I2 y ..-Ev..r.,':?4'i,....,-f- ',V 4. I iikgrillikilt-0 i R-2 = R-25 , .. I 1 R-3.5 , • ,. 1 RR40.5 MSvn I -, 400 0 400 803 1200 Feet nimi,--i■-- AXONS • : 11 City of Tigard 11 • ......-- E5.- - ,.. . Fanno Creek Trail Study Dam 12/19/96 t ...._ • ,� Forested N r eas lAta vie aunri1111111.►� \ri„ nom - 4,4 row EleAr -it::77477,&< / . .<ct I .......1 ,,,...../,. .. ....... . -4)0 ■.• � 0 /1/4 ph *� ii ►.v � ....4....„,%. issimi I ••► ` ' -' --9 y iaX / O �� I � ` \ pr I• L•44 . ?4,1,. **-• #■ '-‘ 4 4i1 ----, 44, / p ma \ , 1 7c. 111k,.. , " 41,4ii\ •.,.. , 4 \, A • A $.4* ;16 riAllr--,•-,-., 4014 . *V 4.40.Vgs:41.......k to� 1�a a ::iiimu \ i 111110 „rjoi WAI \ ��Lu 111. — VIM SE I. �\, McDon. . '@ in iui►if. \�.. ..IN 41111 1111111rr/►�Tp•. fin■uuu1alLow_- IIII \\ �,.`aunq= 1-1 =aimmuipLogist ,:ii _Lit *,.\\.... • i_ wrogrici. . L. -, t IN". . %, J.' r_J r----occal Eigillig a Illpr t' `1 . mu ® wa .m1iuI: I _1 Iv Sul Ewe a� .■:■nu.���. i III MINIM III A/Fanno Creek ;: , an Tributaries ■ J `A/Existing Trail Segments } uu nuuuu� �1 —�_J �■•.� l ���Roads �a • .7d.��� '._� Parcels JForested Natural Area Potential ;Wt*411111171ke- High-;�ti Medium..f� Low I 1000 0 1000 Fea ■ City of Tigard Fanno Creek Trail Study Dace: 12/19/96 • • • Soil Limit§tions )0,2„.....,..„,,,,.„..„..„:„...... ■ 4- ."- AVII1, 1 ::,3::-...,t4',-.,: ---- • ..„;:-.-,2 ";:---n"r:',-:=.:7F,7-'.Ak'=',":'..::,',:-. ..t,A.":. i 1%...4■1111111 \ r.1.-„*N,..4r,;,,,,xx,1:4i.1.."tle.,4",:-P,-.2..zet,:".31 . /(-- _....,Viallawm.\ 11, 1;<•':',',-,.",-,7.,--,,..?....-=.'70,-:.7'-1-,,:. ,.-r.":":,,,A","'-i-."'' 1 Aff„yainvirak\ ', :,,,e0.ffial ...... .......,,..,—.-or. < -6?,... ...../../;.?:''''' P'. • .,ii. Mill11,141; •4:.e. -..':;,,,. .3:',',iil: ,,,,,,,,,,',,,,,,;,,,,to.___,N Aso gfr ..---,-•04%. -,,,,--,-,:,,, ,:,„::, ,„..,.. .,,,:-,,:;,:r.- ,...;,..-07-ery.....TIA,,T,1•41",__ _.r 4. ---,„....‘0, i.''','' , :.-,.-.::',"-.1' ,--,4-ft:" ..,.`-.;-.; .-,,--.- • -..,op.% rii,is_.,..i. .11,\ / -.1',',.......•.10,r ta'-'`.4.;-:-.A:4ki,....,---."-:,,,,,;'4,,,,.,,,, .;:"i",":: .i :/. .--.": Mil Et% 0 w • A=. 'I.4,.14, " "'• ,,,.??,W,,,,,-,a,,V , •141,10'aki, 4■ Nre ,j-.-;;;.:..j- ,7,•,!." :";-;:.';' Will lilt It *4 1'010 4.6,. t•s A, -;'T:-,,, 4\ f 111.ikr%, • .. .; ,....v.--%.,.•;,:,--,1, oar or,&•,,, ii., 11' .., 4" • •,:ti"." - ,n% :"..1,.." T▪r...!:"▪ :",,,t• 'r;5!..E,,',:,:::>,',.7 ifr- Ili, /11` ,7 4; ,..;: „..S 4,4 A, ■ ■■ *" .‘■.,5**.N.N\..,\. --',,,',..-,,,, 1' '. ..,:w1,1::,:',',V''.:= ..S ',41tA14::■414SZA AIN , ';:,1,- ., .■ ■ , •.. . . -,. . . mil■\ .„ .. ,:,,,,,V.,,:`-:- ..'','''',':,,t,,,f,,,,,.. . •..,,I., 44,. :.1,, • ""'-,-,"*,,,?-1, ,,,,..., If-?.'-g,,,,,,,,T_,Sy,,,,t",,,:.-7,..\ .t..0.,,,,-_0:44:04"46 41■Ao a '4%k .",.'-''-e:;...1.1",;,.'''''''',-..,"2'..'. '''', „ ,. "..$ •('-4.:1',:',.',"1.;`,-'4%"•ak.',' .=424'.'",'4".",iy?-,',,,A' $'■4•4..-•• '.".4 "Iirs•I:, \ ?;5','7.t,:,..,,:a'--':•tA, ,,,,,,•,•••,.•-• • Iti,." 4:i443 .0 ,A.,144,,M.;„•Z141 :0•■•11',4)#4.104# •as. Fidtiorar ,\ti--A'c,-,. •',:),1'44, ,.;="'''';'.4',1';:-.-'':'' ,i.'4 ,,...,x7.%-.-,,b1,,VYs, ..4.....4.:*.igilv,v,:::::'44.g.i2i etol,44.4:ti:...-..1% ;,,-.:.,.-.i , \ ,...4 0-,'"4-,.k-- =-=`;,&,`,1';?„,‘",t,.=•. _*f.=';',..,1 r,,ftft.11,441.1 pi„11:11,4'&,--R."1,44,4'7 Set”•064 Zs%.......Z i.:::::.,■.'-. -,-7-7:04=;:i.:-. iii'... ?..:-.5),-":,-('1,-,-;:;;;::,.;-.:,.':,,:.; i.,:.: k-,,,..,".t.4-i.-.1,-, ,--.-,..,.,.i,N...k..0,4..,(41,-,*:- 0 111%.414010. •la:..,..i1 flak,--..„•.,A4.:,..% . .'- 4,,i41,f,W 4.(47.P,,,I'lif,(0,44,4"4.44411,,..r ,...:.Vf.f.aa.6 lien'firsaull W AZ:, 1 \ 't.A.,%`-:-..:„.=&4;•••:,Y; '-•:.... ,,...- i•V''''''r;l''T,''''''.1.4. '41:.#/f•al•VIKJ>43:fIllt5V4-11:'.0•41t,145;41ini:"P-. land'''' .'eM,;4",( A \ - --r,, .'.-'-' :., e0,4/ 1,4,,,itglt.4.41,,,`,,,,A,),.J.,g,Y„^:„,5VYA'D..1.,,,;*'?:;.',,',ii,e'■(,...`," ..,,,".".:1?,:',:i, ,visa..";;;;,;;,.,.... 1,5,,., ,,,,-A'eki., , , . ,-V611§1, ,. ."' ,:m3:::Adtt 42109 2":"MillinIM 'gVt4,43ttie;,.::: S•''C'j'-McDoij". '.—r;imiltd,Mv■_ ..„,st Milk ....,,:kv.,..942..s....c.,R,z4.,...;.,.,„,...,. _ ,..0,..- . it,-,?,.,„...,:::?:*_.?„4,vpiln... 12:3_..vago-iimper.771 I Ok11111111 4.,,,, 4.,,,,,,,,.,,,,,„.!... .iik:;,,,,,,y,:etsyi.---7.,1E...;,...,„„,„,t,war.,1-.-. . • /1404k\ gm 11):.;.•,iitnt,..411,.: l'-"•....,,?,j■1 •.:A.--:,,,,,•;;"..•:0.1407,71".. ..1V.1;."^.7.;::,,,,',",:, ovine ki.,,,,peil..gm, . -.-.,- : ,,,,,,,,,,,t4+:11;,:i-Z.;z:i14.4.'1:0 ,z^,.',1,,:.=e4iiniiiiiiptil S.le, ,•2:i;,.jit, ..!'s",W.,",' '1_,.4.,',r?.,14,,r,--....-p,6'::::,,.-s, -';',•,!---0:[:,..iNVITSIMoiroiti-so 14 121; 1 -.,,,-..-:-. -....,..•...,,,,, .--1-_-:,...,...."-t,•-----.!"„ -";,,,, ,aggo9c.-,,tt".ati- gal lip : :4`;,,'"1--:, '41:.?::".:Hri .,?!-:,"4'$,_?■, -.-',31.0%it IT'r,6ogi 4,r4.i , ,:;I 44 • .V...::,--f'-',if';ii_":',4,',.'''.jc.t;.4=-..3-ii< f ."''''' ::=".11;',.;?gr'',-,!'':::: ::2,-"'''''. ,Ii."■-r..':"'",7!.)::• ;-"Q;::''i'-:2":;f,,,,, Sg ,7.:...ai,:.:4Z Ellmimmr"111•1 res ::,.".',.•:"W;IY,.;;.?? 1:4":4".-0. -5.7.j?..Wir 0,.'v izr.mo,,,,,. l 4:il. a,lin mm.1 ; IIIN r i''''''.@;•;,,,,g1:11,:.,,,,..;,:rilf;A*4 R.tiegrA P'''',111.1/i ..., Nolips k .;..;MBE lir 4-';' .p....",,,-4.--.1-4,7:-'4,4121-01'''; 192111,■11+111. alla';''Aiiin 1 _ ,d-,.:-Wil. -4,14r4,1'm IliAti VIII .,,,,F1-14,.,s.'il,,,,K4,,,,, ,i7.•in bruin spa" ue.:_usginoniV,t7 ill Fanno Cree --`r:WIS Mesta 1:Cal/Aral ,.. • ",1:',.:,L-i.' -6 et attif;.101r 1,,:;.;, A/Tributaries 7.:•.1..:-'31 -,:.:k ,_,), .,, „ . , . ,„... .,. isanin 4,0... .1 :.:;;;ii:;ifs."•tri .''4k:el!ELM,;‘,1‘111, '''-'tt--;',:.:', ,..1 ..,...--, / /Existing Trail Segments 1:::::;"-.?i:,42.'';;X.k'' --0,-(dill Pia riAlk)i■' I , :.r.,..miufauitllilIl1 a6Nakiii',.'"i''A'. _j...,, , A/Roads .,,,,,i,;,.,. .,,,,,i:4*`y:4-., ,, -t?g-,,,i'2,:-4 _ Duch 1 t.,,----t-N L Parcels [ .,,,,...'.- --_,.:,-;:","•?•,. . _ ,'2,7;;;:::.- iteg;:%-;.-z\I" Soil Limitations , ,,.9„. ., -f. ... = .,, ,,.1,-; . ) -,*.,,,,,,:psi.,,,,,,,ik.}c,IF,.w,,;,.,..„,,,,.:....4,,t--4-;'.:;,,,,,li ' s .g.-0,,W,-_:=0: .1,1F21,.71 Slight ,,.s., 4,,,,,,,,,,-.4. 1.-.. ,,....4„*.a.,.. ,..2, ,..,,,:-.,4 .—. -4,..,..- ‘..c.,6 .,...w.e, Moderate 4,,,,,..k,-*„..„..,i:,..,ukr.:-.,.- -:-....ik,,,,,,,,e,,,,,t,,,,,Aikoi,-,,,,,,....41,,, , ',4?7:eA. ' ,14."A4::-;,-Ffi "-,..7".".i : „. ..7t,1/4,-6:;;".V,'•-1„*1:-- ',.4',..,,,,!,,,,•,,,,,,4.-•',:--,,,,:;,a,14:,.-•;,,,,,;.:,,,,,,;}...., ..- -,?, .,:,...i--, ,,,,y,,F.7.,0 •,,,,,t..,.,,, ,,-..:,vm;.:La?,,:..,,,t,,,...,;f;,-,„..,,,,, • tittop, Severe .S.ILimitations impacting the location of improved trails 400 0 400 800 1200 Feet tT !!6■■ii5 Mall. • El City of-Tigard ..,..-- ..-.5.--.- :.-......1 .. .,. Fanno Creek Trail Study Dam I 2/19/96 • • Fiocfdplain & Weffands 1 r S1 Sl • 11! ` 1 •.Or. ...4.-..: k j, </y Nu.Ha her. ':•qii�- ��.:.. V r,.,. .„4k.. ..„, 1„..,..„,• ,,,, ,,,, en in ,.:::....:.,.:,-,...:,:, ri„.,...„,,,,. #11°- ^�_ �qgC \ a% airs , ., ;,; i, 1tegi IIETAm11'�® \ �)1 Iu- gi %= rl o. - NO -II``--':AEI .. _.. ,-.7 \\ we"McDona • "�II WI.,n.r, '''.'1,-: �. Me u ffigi r/r. lip. Ill le.r. of 1 '',� \ r 1� ...�■� 1 fir" � ��R:4 II A( -�� x IN.... 1. .. .....1 r N.::R_ ; i .... 1 .. ; S_„.■ v ■1�o1i 1®� b In 4 400 j m.mm�Sy�fsf.,1 4 1 ( =Da ra /gm /V Fanno Creek tall / Tributaries ,,,, ,,,,,,.j� rlw V L ram 7� Existing Trail Segments III or NRoads Parcels � Wetlands Floodplain 400 0 400 800 1200 Feet 10 " City of Tigard ., Fanno Creek Trail Study = ==' Data [Z/I9�96 ....... ...,.. ... .. . • . • , • . • „...„..(k,1 Study Area ,'Yj Fir 1 ri..1. . /`.4,4,tits Jam/ .'40100 ®tom>° , 7 g3nqbft, *.tr _,07 -a=role 0•♦g//��z.: rs . .4,40� z.- ~, . I!n u ICI•'♦�•:4, v# #, 4P' ... ..„4*.„. ,,,,-`'w , ,,\, / 2.7,4„. .,,,,,, All__ ,o,,,k, i # :4,-4,1,A„,k\ ..-1 welli\ 1111■ ,e.;4 ty,k_ 'I*) Ike, 7c. , . $.1,40,... 44..„4„,.. _ ,,. t;*4'itt.••41.i.ms ds.,„1, illiiir _=,::\\\ -1414-1 ii.6. , ..,:.„1 r _I, i 1 -LL:=11. 1 N\ 111L-11---1 arAii 'S.c- , , \ LAM in. 11111111tesoN, \MIME McDon • ' 1 uus f ,: 1.0--.,,. r�� INrI,iu r� � ,4.. Ilimilk b -!nuilu f>11111111 • *in Immo*II==1111p91ill�a"I• �' �- ills��1V,:isPM. U 1.r.`t. ■ I=:ter►���1 7 Li%IIIIIIIIIIi iI ��i n . ■m 11 '` Ii um IN A i IIE la III AVInikii i No ir ivtmal 141 Rat_II Amnia MI m•i Ina 111111♦/r� 1%i�t'11 4y.,, 1 • ) 111,,...,.: l m■uoul.� mute saw mil r11INl1 uurr?'11111 all Fanno Creek Du 1 a , r 7� ' /V Tributaries = ' `��� � /Reads _,_ / V J �, Parcels F*Ililli Greenway(Floodplain) 1000 0 1000 F. la City of Tigard T, Fanno Creek `Trail Study tea 12/19/96`' . • • . , Proposed Trail Alignment • From Tiedeman Ave. to Main Street Igrer; 11-,,,ie,:b; ,,.ei : 1.' 101111:11144, A „ %'1 „f 'tqt`I''V' - --------, -,,'t,,., - -cll.. *,. '=' t. -3.‘•-,...-1-,,,-;-, -, -,--: .i '..;•,N4,..1,- - -'3`i t4 *,‘,:(t ,o' 141tVZ-V. .4110" '13(4 .;7*. P.-\,,,,,,,,,,. t, ;4'i "c'.,,,,,''',..„, „%;.4 ;l -i''''....`-',„- N 1 k -,-t '"k`%5,, ,;;;, ..,., ,,',; ';',;.V-tt*, , ,, e4,i/i<hAt-44-,-7,,,,, li0.-,-..-Y4,4.,..,14?''.....' ,, 1. 7.' ' ,,-.' -ta,i,-. ,1-,. ,r -::., . ,W?ing5,5,,i,i1," ,,t#4:-,N.,;.:g,z1tivto .0.',.:.T,04,-.4.*..-#0c1Yfir ` . ' : ,.. '74144? ftf). N:ige I, ,,„44: ' ,..',;ztf - /0 ,3Y,v,,,4041.; -itilre'let .10 ,,,,,c; ..„,,„„0,,,„‘„At, kv„,,,tbk4, It 1 •,,,"0'": - rhoi All ., Ig..,' Atrckk.i,r,',!%s,,,Acaiz,;, '414, 1,- ,,,..4,e04-.., .'r•Vir.0;\-"`"Atr:Y,='V.:7;:,*'''"_wkA tic, pAiqf-Aot4e • 0 iva,-:4 f i,7 ;le, 1,. - -Yi, -,„ -,-.0,-7 ' ''''-''''',.. .', ,V,s1',‘. •04,,,,.i..._,.,..,- „ . -\'', ii..4....,4;',..-'r..C.,:.:A';'?. 4 -^^`* 141417,4 - -,,,,I,-4,.,;,,E446 ' -..' ,.'..*o''‘' ... 44,-..•v Pr':ti,r.f. c. rt '!'4"---'',1, Z r„. yl i 1 1>ij"'.':' k i, '1,..0:0 I ; 4,;;S:ikliii0Miik :14, - .,..'., ip ,,,,, v; . 044,ay. 11 vi,,kmiti.,,,...„-_,,44*.itgor ,•A , , .,01;ii›, . ,.-4-1,-.74.:-.Z•,•,,rtrz?,& , .,-,, Pn:24,1', .,,.;•,,,v--, V-, : .-t.49,. itiq 'i' •-41.ti,,,ce„;-.''..,i,',14',. .-‘,:' \.s,.:*•sz, ',PI,'•'4.' ,i-4.4.7--,i v:''' ritt16% ""4-31.44'' ir.....4.'&,..i)-Q,,-•-., 411Opet:':,-',4-t.,...4,0:4 ,,, .. i_ 1 .,,,....,_,,„„... :4,,,o,',7,7:,--eoP• .1-..„...,r..•, QI, Y,'."'"...j."f,„ ,<-,-VA''',..aji-s :', Al P', "%"t'''' I',,V.-','- .41*c?*.' 4,--",, * Eli 7-',-7--''..`v4.--,-• ''''-t‘,' ,,,,'.... ,4,... 3.41tvilikl.241431'"'-'`-4' -,...4* ".-;;::,-,'t;',.0-*S444,4‘,v.., ,,,zsmt4i,-„At•-. ,--fl„..,00.;;- if / ,!--r+ At.41,, • ,,,,-,,..--,,,-t•. 1... ,isriro ,. -,,f,,,,.., .+,,., ,.%,:fit,,...,s(It ,+4• .k .ittrr.."-, ,,$,.. -,,•':,`.''),,,--,'4:AA, t,u4 okS2,t'0,..1r.:.:•.,,,,c,,.;,,.1-„,.-, :-'. t", ry r .- 1 . ,,... v _, , ,, ,,, ,,,,,,,, 417..,,„"e 4';e4rfl.i ' . .5,...414,,I .:;'01Z,,,,/..... , ,1., ',.•7,4.„..,,,, ,... 4/ xi,,f ‘-•-•,,z,'-‘;z,Z., f,t,y.,-;.-:.-7- -.---...„ . tti:'....,L: . , 4 irr:14 '.14/6--,./6 mtlti.-,,..'..)'9,te....- ,;, 1,„...1..-.e;=-. ..--i-.40.,: -'",:-::".,`,lii.'i liv,44.'-',1*-3-, ..7N: lg47 44"7:?t,,,..4.1-r.!: ,.,t,,'. lz.,,,.. 1—11_ I, 1 ,,,:;',,.- , .•.., ,-,- *'''fAA),4,-. ,''' Nis,,,.:-',„ :', -'.-.....,-4,- ti' -4:4Y- "--''.44-4-4 ',.9.4,-4iiikV-V,', Z1 -- i..''./ h14,16.1.4.44,426,'- - 44`A ,*;'...?1,,,11;„ "-/-4'il'e .,,,i,„:S.2,A:'.,..01.;.17:..,:; :=. ,-.--,,,,,--- , .1,0......,,: .,...•,-‘.;,'-...--., j,,,;,a,--.'0? I r,,,,;1:-;‘,,,Y,:-.:11:-.;,-,1.4,,,i,;,;,„..-,,;.t. „,,, ''F-ty„.:,o .t.:,W .:;,,7,." 41, . f.,• 4.' t 45 - 4"4,,,--. i ti,i ,, 7-., P:r k 4 n W4".41.ipt:,g""'• '„,,,Or':-.1,,'• ',.,.;e*;i,.,..,,,-' °Ai * won"..4-/Akp,,,,,,,,,, ......* ::, .-k '''' ,-,----.''LAt'"*S' ■'1',....tia'''''. Sii1/4) AP .,..,11610t* '-'4,4.4)Z, .,..*:'-'t,-.y.-,P, , ,-;%.,',. , -' ,,--"'-..4,43., 41103e.v.A'.6t,-!„.. ./4.4f,or;„77-1-lit'4,..z..- l4" --rN ..^,4),, 1,10,4i,4-46_11!„.•ii tt:74",-;:r.1/4 ,2,4'.4',..q...e.4.,;i,,,N.1.1,,,t,to., ,,N -ir ,,k,...41,:tv,.... ,,. 1 1-.4.',7-` . 4.11 , ./.2, ,414.,..7 My'474-,q'''; ,,- Ifil4-1;:4§.1,1, sz% 11 l "■,&t 4,t, ,c7,`, s.,.441,,,A* :„.„Qp,c,;4.*,,,),. 4 PF)..,3,,,f,„Aie 1, i„,,/kt.•, ...:),.,„, % 1 -`-, t 1'1 - ' .,-.-,-.- 4),,,,t4t,,s.4 ,,r,\,?,;,;-:,+.i4-4*;,,, ir.4.., . ',,,,*'%,,,., ' Ag._ '11041\1'Ik'd)144,`-'0';''A,Vik.*kg -t,... , ,-.41,'.1-''''-. -"-.% '1;-',,I.- *NV' 14*: 4 ,,,'1;`:7, ,,'`e, ■A ,,T., 4-kid;i,, p AV:A:. . - ' A ;;;-„,.,., ..ilr -60 ,,,L. , ,dip .,.1'Ji, 4'.,„do. ,,,..',4ks,, ,,,41.ski „A 4 ' ,71,4,4:^3N,AS ,..,r - , `.\IN...tit,*..4wf-111W/C10 .4-" 4'110,,iVs*,4.-.1".., r4e,fiV,/,”.;-/-:„ osis 1 .-, „ .I.,..,.4..4..0,,,,,o?.. ...:1-0 ,,T,,,c,,...---,:_,,,,-4.0, „,,,• ,l,k ...1kot:.,11. ,,k,041-00 - 1 - ;17-';fAikore,- 441, ,,,-• 1,::0'41(.1,V4.44t , 1‘.,..' ,..iit-1/440,, -,74 --ip.il,1-,,..:),r-',..7. 11 ,-,, '1, ,..1"•-.61.0e..0.t--.. 4 , , ,--4”: '+, •.:r0.',' 1 q '''' !•.. ..;..4 '''0.:.< 1,' .k ...1... / . ._. , ,. ;of ,,f4, ..-. co4),,,,..: „f ,,,, tlo„',.,*., ..,0.-r.Welt 44, ).. t ::. 1-. ., , #4, *.4.7tt,„e,;1:. jeltk:v,',(34,44. "I - '' '''.11' '''''1 4 g ,•, 1:V,,•,.4414414... '..."4. e...,;,,,t,. -;,,. ...:::,..•4, ,..:.-. - 0 ?ova '•,:ytil,,,,4N7,4,404, .1;4,.st,,S, , 4:-.6 4:i.,1;;V,V,;1,. Wetlands A/Preferred Trail Alignment • . .".... Alternate Trail Alignment / . V Neighborhood Connection Trails A/Fanno Creek Tributaries Existing Trail Segments 0" Greenway (Floodplain) N Public Ownership . 500 0 500 Feet /V Roads ...."••■•=. Parcels MIMI • F31 City of Tigard 2,......--- Trail a7. -Tv-- .:61 ....-s1.-....1 .2- Fanno Creek Trau. Study Date 2,7,97 • . PropOsed Trail Alignment I . From Hall Blvd. to Bonita Road `� +D':; {tvn�3 '°'\�Yr { ,l ♦ yr sY J j . , K.,. ., ,,,:,,,„,0' yt x , .-Y r ,-,./..-:.y s' l o 't ' .. l; f(;ate � )mlii L�. il�i \�??�+ %, �%6riffi t 4i A ;�,F�f'J.t. / ,, ` �t'5 t'e#'11 r i f, �i j -0.7, �. tt...-- 1 ... 1 'k � s' ��lp ,,,t�zz /r {, -. \zt) a,byt, t P I7lr-- 'n t t a fL° ,.1 c Rt4�ril‹ i ,i' �+,:y".k i t Ilya N ...s\. 4 ",fr + i�eR > ,, I ..d*fy,z• i A•_✓^`\:,:;,)�,�=O, i. \Ctk tY f. 1 e' �d r 1 44.0,y',i'4.: ', s'. �99.�1 t 'O r 'd_ + 7Y.\ 4,:A F4 1)05 0\1 2:14 y Jri Jd y ``�u f, '' ' Y:.� i1`7:. i ``t, it 0r 17,-- pr >,d1 :' , v )P ,A.:', �i"�+1�' 7P's7 f- .:-,..,::,.,,-:..-1.i„.,,,,.,.;, .lam•• -T-rr d'.,i xx4 r- 1a w�z.y-, t ((�. . 'g' �4'I.�� ! �� ✓ r � _ Ey kr .(. k�. ®:. •I�1,ior:* � , '•i! ‘' •3 ti :5;,Y / ; rt +' , Yom." 4 1.2 ,;- P+aa.,,� s f • h,N-I ,4 d J .yb'1'„`}y 1 k• })'.t. r` ''', .t` -Ayi . 11,l'in/IPHibtaiW.111 a. r .. I L 4. .1 � � S,,�^ } } +fit !se - 8 f r.0-",;. z 't, 3 � •lrf 0:\#O !� i fj1. ' . yl{ { Y J 1 i r1YrV' tr �i' r p r ♦ 1■s F''Y1 `` '' 1 i_ tr. •, ,ri ,7 ti .!a '4,-44,.., -"k.4.1„;,4 • 5 i 1' ' i .�. a .t ' �4• t .� o- et.■ t p' , .,1.1.* '' ' \ '• y,1:r4 .l . ^t y L, '-:I 1 1' ,t a P f e1 3F ,1 ,'i" z A 1\.•.'".. 9sif 4 7 ;77,1 : 74t•47;1. Nit... n F h . + f ", 11 t ,:-....,.;•A l't4 4 .. 1 " �t. f'-t..:.(4), • Nuit�� 7fyl_rf3 ; s , .} ,y re i +' c `M1 t r � l +✓ �.+. \ r kt 'S ! 4 t 4- ' . { . t. .��i4�°'� 1 ,,.`'�� J ! 1��, ,i�' iP'i{RC'1 a�l '-�cy1 .+L: ,mti 4,.k J< 1*C - ,*-7-7, ��! Y y ;*#•sz 7'7 ` Y k4v A ,i674y4, fij ` j �y�is t .7a at. 7. v N , tts3, ! L,' !•-•.e l-,,, .,1,-,,,,." . ')41 1.4 1.4'�' +f1,-t. t• g `t ti c q s'1 tr ��„ ��, , t.i IIIiiIiIu 1111d�HI . 11 , ,"�� A...„' �, .- j y�z ,;� 4.4.-,,,,,3;,41,,,r;.,,4'4072,u�7/^fy 1 rtt�rr...t ♦ 1 k " :.` l Fe.'$'',''' ''.:`,--`4----„---\ y .�. �,t S , , e.' '�",+: �c\ . 1i* :1 F a gi,s_e+.,�',fyi yuv t.t v.L.v,, iily�Y ' -. \ 4 3x t i`tu `,. -', �'0t"r 17_ y,t,4ur.. i'in1& •V tia s, " 4,,.,Sy"1 Xt, r:1) Oy♦ \.,f ;t+„ xl ,, R 2+ --'31" t '. p diva 41 ttTT.}r�/i 1.114". ``1:2 f=6 1,' .)AP,. ∎.,� . . C `'ISM, .... L 1 t■ � ?eq�to '41��� i,L + '�}`G ++ ♦ �7ps , 4 :•-•--\\ ? \ z �} 7j J , 1 1 I,,,,,. a yrvmrL .•la a J.a $ fr iv r w�� d f 't,A �\�7,1 y p 4 y, { '41.," 1'413 �.xf,frr,. �GG �I a+ 4,\t���a v" M +���, ' ,�w;�i � e � .t. �5r \°�Y`���� � �� ' Ift rt".E• I { � We F -,-,./....,,,,,,o, ! 'P 101"4'.:i\\ ma ida p1<M,,.7 '4 s".F` 1x' ^:rr t j' 'b.\\ \�}k1.; ' g"x� d7 g' �y,r' l�.b �. ' ";l.M'"'x � .ta �/`h:� ��,i s rq> \1 C z �•• tt _� t,NitifT'I .0- 0. ° y + 4 1�+ {1 t 11 4 N, ' F,1,1 t h+.ti;,,lrf t try f ,,RMM y 7 �� �...1,, t� d ;I i t i. y f y Yii 1 t t - l iM �sj /� 1"'- •^crr . . ,r''' ] , yy P,..— -Rkt �St-4,-1.ec ,..L Ifl ,J t 'w' 1" .v 's� y � + i,�1 ,1 �1' 'i. : `.� :si4Ol tiiIir fl.. _t L L' tH �t'`Yd'r 1251• eir.-''Y x' j,. Wetlands VPreferred Trail Alignment '• ;' Alternate Trail Alignment Neighborhood Connection Trails NFanno Creek A/Tributaries Existing Trail Segments Greenway (Floodplain) 1C—i( ' Public Ownership 500 0 500 Feet A/Roads .1.1••• 11 Parcels 11 • City of Tigard _ .4 Fanno Creek Trail Study =� ==' �,, Dare: x/7/97 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS WETLAND DELINEATION FANNO CREEK TRAIL T1S, R1W, SE 1/4 SECTION 34 & T2S R1W NE & NW 1/4 SECTION 2, WASHINGTON COUNTY TIGARD, OREGON Prepared for: Duane Roberts,Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Prepared by: C. Mirth Walker& Stacy Benjamin Fishman Environmental Services Consultants in Ecology and Natural Resource Management 434 NW 6th Avenue, Suite 304 Portland,OR 97209-3600 March 1998 FES Project 97126 Fishman Environmental Services • 434 NW Sixth Avenue • Portland, OR 97209-3600 0 (503) 224-0333 • FAX (503) 224-1851 0 _ �tUN WETLAND DELINEATION FANNO CREEK TRAIL T1S, R1W, SE 1/4 SECTION 34 & T2S R1W NE & NW 1/4 SECTION 2, WASHINGTON COUNTY TIGARD, OREGON Prepared for: Duane Roberts, Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Prepared by: C. Mirth Walker & Stacy Benjamin Fishman Environmental Services Consultants in Ecology and Natural Resource Management 434 NW 6th Avenue, Suite 304 Portland, OR 97209-3600 March 1998 FES Project 97126 Fishman Environmental Services • 434 NW Sixth Avenue • Portland, OR 97209-3600 (503) 224-0333 • FAX (503) 224-1851 atk n�N TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION 3 1.1 National Wetlands Inventory 3 1.2 Soil Survey 4 1.3 Site Elevation and Topography 4 1.4 Flood Plain Information 4 1.5 Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory 4 2 METHODOLOGY 5 3 WETLAND AREAS 6 3.1 Area One - Fowler School Site 6 3.2 Area Two - SW Grant Street Site 8 3.3 Area Three - Dolan Property/SW Main Street Site 9 3.4 Area Four - SW Ash Avenue Right-of-Way Site 10 4 WETLAND DETERMINATION CONCLUSION 10 5 REFERENCES 12 6 SITE DATA SHEET 13 APPENDICES 23 Appendix A: Wetland Determination Data Sheets Appendix B: Vegetation of the Fanno Creek Trail Sites Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 Page i LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1. SITE LOCATION MAP 14 FIGURE 2. NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP 15 FIGURE 3. SOILS MAP 16 FIGURE 4. FLOOD PLAIN MAP 17 FIGURE 5. TIGARD LOCAL WETLANDS INVENTORY 18 FIGURE 6. AREA ONE - FOWLER SCHOOL SITE WETLAND MAP AND SAMPLE PLOT LOCATIONS 19 FIGURE 7. AREA TWO - SW GRANT STREET SITE (NORTH) WETLAND MAP AND SAMPLE PLOT LOCATIONS 20 FIGURE 8. AREA TWO - SW GRANT STREET SITE (SOUTH) WETLAND MAP AND SAMPLE PLOT LOCATIONS 21 FIGURE 9. AREA THREE - DOLAN PROPERTY/ SW MAIN STREET SITE & AREA FOUR - SW ASH AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY SITE WETLAND MAP AND SAMPLE PLOT LOCATIONS 22 Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 Page ii WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY SITE NAME: Fanno Creek Trail SITE LOCATION: Four site areas: Fowler Middle School, SW Grant Street, Dolan property/SW Main Street, and SW Ash Avenue right-of-way, all located along Fanno Creek, west of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Tigard Street in Tigard, Oregon. T1 S, R1W, SE '/4 Section 34 and T2S, R1W,NE &NW 1/4 Section 2 Washington County APPLICANT: Duane Roberts, Planner City of Tigard DATE OF SITE VISITS: January 6 & 16, February 4 & 5, 1998 PROJECT STAFF: C. Mirth Walker, Wetlands Program Manager Christie Galen, Ecologist Stacy Benjamin, Biologist FES PROJECT: 97126 SUMMARY The City of Tigard is proposing to build a pedestrian/bicycle trail along Fanno Creek as a continuation of an existing series of trails in Tigard. The current phase of trail construction will be located in four areas: Fowler Middle School;north and south of SW Grant Street; south of the Dolan property and SW Main Street; and SW Ash Avenue right-of-way. These four areas are all located along Fanno Creek, west of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Tigard Street in Tigard. Eleven wetland areas, including emergent and mixed emergent/forested,were delineated on the four site areas in the vicinity of the proposed trail. The City of Tigard has not determined the final trail alignment and intends to route the trail around wetlands to avoid impacts where feasible. Hydrology of the delineated wetland areas is provided by groundwater seeps and precipitation. Fanno Creek (a water of the State and of the U.S.) is the predominant hydrologic feature of the subject areas. Hydrology observed in the wetland areas included shallow scattered ponding, a depth to free water ranging from the surface to 5 inches, soils saturated to the surface in most areas (a few areas were saturated to 4 inches only from recent precipitation) at the time of the site visits, drainage patterns in wetlands, and oxidized root channels in the surface horizon. Our investigation was conducted during the very early part of the growing season; some upland areas exhibited ephemeral hydrology. Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 Page 1 Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Delineation March 31, 1998 Soils in wetland areas at 10 inches below the surface ranged from black (10YR 2/1) and very dark gray(10YR 3/1) clay and silty clay to very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) and dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2)silty clay loam, silt loam, and sandy silt loam with brown(10YR 5/3 & 7.5YR 4/4), dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4), gray (IOYR 5/1) and dark gray (5YR 4/I) redoximorphic (redox) concentrations and depletions(mottles). The low matrix chroma of 1 and the chroma of 2 with redox concentrations indicate the presence of hydric soils. Soils in upland areas immediately adjacent to the wetland boundary at 10 inches below the surface ranged from dark gray(10YR 4/1) to very dark brown(10YR 2/2), very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2), dark grayish brown(10YR 4/2) and dark brown(10YR 3/3) clay, silty clay loam, silt loam and sandy silt loam with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4), brown (7.5YR 4/4), and dark gray (5Y 4/1) redox concentrations in some areas(mottling was absent in other areas). Redox concentrations were faint or absent in the majority of the upland area. The high matrix chroma of 3 and the chroma of 2 with only faint mottles indicate the presence of non-hydric soils. Dominant vegetation of the Fowler School site was a mixed emergent/forested wetland (Wetland 1) and included reed canarygrass and meadow foxtail in the western portion, and reed canarygrass, smooth scouring-rush, Douglas' spirea, willow and Oregon ash in the southern portion along the creek. Uplands were characterized by the presence of tall fescue, bluegrass, Himalayan blackberry, rose, and ornamental hawthorn. The SW Grant Street site contained four wetlands. The emergent western wetland(Wetland 2A) was dominated by bentgrass. Upland vegetation was demarcated by a predominance of tall fescue. Emergent Wetland 2B was dominated by small-fruited bulrush, creeping buttercup, bentgrass, and American speedwell. Wetland 2C was a sparsely vegetated back water slough. An adjacent upland island was dominated by Himalayan blackberry and English ivy.A mixed emergent/forested wetland in the eastern portion of the site (Wetland 2E)was dominated by reed canarygrass and Oregon ash. Adjacent uplands were dominated by Douglas fir, Oregon white oak, and Himalayan blackberry. Dominant vegetation of the Dolan property/SW Main Street site emergent wetland (Wetland 3) consisted of reed canarygrass, with small amounts of soft rush, Douglas' spirea,willow, and Oregon ash. Uplands were characterized by a predominance of Himalayan blackberry, black hawthorn, and Nootka rose. The SW Ash Avenue right-of-way site contained five wetlands. Wetland 4A was an emergent mitigation site in the western portion of the site consisting of reed canarygrass and broad-leaf cattail. A mixed emergent/forested wetland (Wetland 4B) was dominated by small-fruited bulrush, reed canarygrass, trace soft rush, and Oregon ash. An upland area separating Wetlands 4A and 4B was characterized by reed canarygrass,Himalayan blackberry,black hawthorn,and ornamental hawthorn. Wetland 4D was a small,emergent wetland pocket dominated by reed canarygrass. Reed canarygrass Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 Page 2 Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Delineation March 31, 1998 and soft rush dominated a second emergent mitigation site(Wetland 4E)in the eastern portion of the site. Finally, emergent Wetland 4F consisted entirely of reed canarygrass. Determination of the wetland boundary was based on changes in hydrophytic vegetation and soils. Wetlands were flagged in the field for surveying by David Evans & Associates (surveys attached). Wetland determination data sheets are included in Appendix A. Vegetation noted on the four site areas is listed in Appendix B. 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION At the request of the City of Tigard (City), Fishman Environmental Services (FES) conducted a wetland delineation of the wetlands associated with Fanno Creek in the vicinity of a proposed pedestrian/bicycle trail along Fanno Creek. The purpose of the wetland delineation was to assist with determining trail alignment. The City requested that FES delineate wetlands within 50 feet of the edge of Fanno Creek. Fanno Creek flows in a generally southerly direction through the site areas, and for ease of discussion, trail and sample plot locations will be referred to as being on the east or west side of the creek. The current phase of trail construction includes four site areas located west of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Tigard Street in a residential/commercial area of Tigard (Figure 1). The four site areas are described below, in a north to south direction. Area One, the Fowler School site, is located west of SW Tiedeman Avenue, south of SW Tigard Street, and north of the Fowler School and track, on the west side of Fanno Creek. Area Two, the SW Grant Street site, is located north of Pacific Highway (Highway 99W) and east of SW Tiedeman Avenue, both north and south of SW Grant Street, on the east and west sides of Fanno Creek. Area Three, the Dolan property/SW Main Street site, is located south of SW Main Street, east of Maplewood Drive, and west of SW Burnham Street, on the east side of Fanno Creek, and extends to the Ash Avenue right-of-way and an existing trail. Area Four, the SW Ash Avenue right-of-way, continues south from Area Three on the west side of Fanno Creek. 1.1 National Wetlands Inventory The Beaverton, Oregon National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)map (Figure 2) identifies Fanno Creek as riverine, upper perennial, open water that is intermittently exposed/permanent (R3OWZ). Two additional wetlands are mapped on the Fowler Middle School site.A palustrine,persistent, emergent, wetland that is intermittently flooded/temporary (PEM1W) is mapped in the northern portion of the site, and a palustrine, broad-leaved deciduous, forested wetland that is intermittently Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 Page 3 Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Delineation March 31, 1998 flooded/temporary (PF01 W) is mapped in the central portion of the site. No additional wetlands (aside from Fanno Creek) are mapped in the other three sites. 1.2 Soil Survey Soils were mapped on the site by the USDA Soil Conservation Service (Natural Resources Conservation Service)in the Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon (USDA SCS 1982; Figure 3).North of Pacific Highway, a band along Fanno Creek is mapped as the poorly drained Cove silty clay loam (map unit 13) which formed in recent clayey alluvium on flood plains. The portion of the Fowler School site to the west of Fanno Creek is also mapped as Cove silty clay loam. South of Pacific Highway,a band along Fanno Creek is mapped as the moderately well drained McBee silty clay loam(map unit 30)which formed in alluvium on flood plains. The Cove soil is a listed hydric soil on the Hydric Soils in Washington County Area, Oregon list (USDA SCS, 1989). The McBee soil may have inclusions of hydric Cove and Wapato soils. 1.3 Site Elevation and Topography Elevation of the sites ranges from approximately 140 to 150 feet(USGS, 1961,photorevised 1984). The sites are generally level, with steep 10 foot banks sloping down to Fanno Creek. The north/northwest portion of the Fowler School site slopes down to the south from SW Tigard Road and to the east from a scrub-shrub/forested area. 1.4 Flood Plain Information Fanno Creek is mapped within the 100-year flood plain (Zone A3), which is shown as 147 to 159 feet in elevation on the subject site on the Flood Insurance Rate Map prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (Figure 4). Fanno Creek has a broad 100-year flood plain which extends from approximately 50 to 750 feet east and west of the centerline of the creek. Portions of the site immediately east and west of Zone A3 are mapped as Zone B, areas between the limits of the 100-year and 500-year flood. Zone B extends approximately 20 to 150 feet beyond Zone B. The floodway extends from approximately 20 to 400 feet from the centerline on either side of Fanno Creek. It is likely that the majority of the proposed trail will be within the 100-year flood plain. 1.5 Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory The majority of the four site areas are mapped as wetlands or are within the resource unit boundary as shown in the Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory Offsite Option and Wetlands Assessment, conducted by FES in 1995 to update the City of Tigard's existing wetlands inventory. Area One is mapped within wetland Site B-5,Area Two is mapped within the Site E-5 Fanno Creek resource area Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 Page 4 Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Delineation March 31, 1998 boundary,Area Three is mapped within wetland Site E-6, and Area Four is mapped within wetland Site E-9. 2 METHODOLOGY The methods for determining the presence of wetlands and delineating wetland boundaries follow the routine methodology of the Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987)used by both the Corps and the Oregon Division of State Lands. Field work was conducted January 6 & 16 and February 4 & 5, 1998. Soils, vegetation, and indicators of hydrology were observed at a total of 15 sample plot locations at the four site areas to document site conditions. The sample plots were marked with flagging tied to lathe stakes or wire whip flags. Wetland boundaries were marked with orange "wetland boundary" flagging tied to vegetation and numbered consecutively. A total of eleven wetland areas were delineated and surveyed in the vicinity of the proposed trail: one wetland (Wetland 1) in Area One, four wetlands (Wetlands 2A, 2B, 2C & 2E) in Area Two, one wetland (Wetland 3) in Area Three, and five wetlands (Wetlands 4A, 4B, 4D, 4E & 4F) in Area Four. Wetland determination data sheets are included in Appendix A. Sample plot locations and wetland boundaries are shown in Figures 6 through 9. Wetlands are defined as areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. In other words, wetlands typically display hydrophytic (wetland) vegetation and hydric (wet) soils, and normally experience wetland hydrology(ponding or near-surface saturated soils) for at least 5 percent of the growing season (typically 12 days or so for this region). The growing season is generally defined as March 1 through October 31 for this region, but may vary annually. Disturbed areas require additional effort and research to confirm the three wetland parameters (disturbed areas do not automatically become non-wetland just because of the disturbance). Reference material used in this study included Reed's National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9) and the 1993 Supplement to this list, where the indicator status of wetland plants are listed. These indicators include: Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 Page 5 Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Delineation March 31, 1998 OBL Obligate wetland(almost always occur in wetlands) FACW Facultative Wetland(usually occur in wetlands) FAC Facultative(equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands) FACU Facultative Upland(usually occur in non-wetlands) UPL,NOL Upland,Not Listed(almost always occur in non-wetlands) NI No Indicator(insufficient information available or plant is widely tolerant) Soils are described with standardized color chips (Munsell Soil Color Charts, Kollmorgen Corporation, 1990 revised edition) of hue,value, and chroma and by texture (sand, silt, clay, loam, muck, peat, etc.). Other materials used in this study are included in the Reference section. 3 WETLAND AREAS A total of eleven wetlands were delineated in the vicinity of the proposed trail in the four site areas. Both emergent and mixed emergent/forested wetlands were present. Wetlands were located on both the east and west sides of Fanno Creek. Fifteen sample plots were examined to document site conditions; their locations are shown in Figures 6 through 9. 3.1 Area One - Fowler School Site The Fowler School site contains a mixed emergent/forested wetland (Wetland 1) associated with Fanno Creek which extends west of the creek across the majority of the site. The emergent wetland in the western portion of the site is dominated by reed canarygrass and meadow foxtail. Small amounts of quackgrass and vetch are present, as well as scattered Douglas' spirea, ornamental hawthorn and Himalayan blackberry. The forested wetland is located nearest to the creek in the southern portion of the site. Dominant vegetation includes Oregon ash,willow, Douglas' spirea,reed canarygrass, and smooth scouring-rush. Two sample plots document wetland site conditions and are discussed below. Sample Plot 2 was located in the northeast portion of the site, on the west side of Fanno Creek. Vegetation was dominated by reed canarygrass and meadow foxtail. Soils were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silty clay loam with no redox concentrations to 6 inches. From 6 to 16 inches, soils were a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) stiff clay with brown (10YR 5/3) redox concentrations, oxidized root channels, and gley starting at 16 inches. Soils were saturated to 4 inches from recent precipitation. Plot 2 was determined to be wetland based on a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, low soil chroma of 1, and hydrology. Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 Page 6 Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Delineation March 31, 1998 Vegetation at Sample Plot 4, located in the northwest portion of the site, was dominated by meadow foxtail, with small amounts of quack grass and ornamental hawthorn and trace amounts of vetch and Himalayan blackberry. Soils were a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) silty clay loam with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations and oxidized root channels. Gray (10YR 5/1) depletions were present at 14 inches. Soils were saturated to the surface, and depth to free water was 0.5 inches. Plot 2 was determined to be wetland based on a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, low soil chroma of 1, and hydrology. The wetland area extends upslope to the west in the northern portion of the site. The wetland boundary was not flagged in this portion of the site; the boundary was only flagged in the vicinity of the proposed trail. There may also be wetland pockets upslope to the north of the wetland boundary, where there are openings in the Himalayan blackberry and black hawthorn canopy and meadow foxtail is the dominant vegetation. Uplands located adjacent to the wetland area were dominated by reed canarygrass, meadow foxtail, tall fescue, bluegrass,rose, Himalayan blackberry, and black hawthorn. A ball field is located in the southwest portion of the site which consists of fill soils planted with bluegrass species. The ball field ponds water on the surface from recent precipitation, but soils lack hydrology indicators below the surface horizon.No sample plots were located in the ball field. Four sample plots document upland conditions and are discussed below. Sample Plot 1 was located in the northeast portion of the site in a fill area at the top of slope. Vegetation was dominated by meadow foxtail with small amounts of reed canarygrass and Himalayan blackberry. Soils were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silty clay loam with faint redox concentrations to 16 inches. Soils were saturated to 4 inches from recent precipitation. Although Plot 1 met the vegetation and hydrology criteria,Plot 1 was determined to be non-wetland based on soil chroma of 2 with only faint mottles. Vegetation at Sample Plot 3, located approximately midslope in the north central portion of the site, was dominated by meadow foxtail, with small amounts of reed canarygrass and tall fescue, and a trace amount of vetch. Soils were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silt loam with no redox features to 5 inches. From 5 to 9 inches, soils became a dark brown(7.5YR 3/2) silty clay loam with faint redox concentrations. Soils were a dark brown (10YR 3/3) silt loam with faint redox concentrations from 9 to 14 inches. Soils were saturated to 5 inches from recent precipitation. Although Plot 3 met the vegetation and hydrology criteria, Plot 3 was determined to be non-wetland based on a high soil chroma of 3. Sample Plot 5 was located in the northwest portion of the site. Meadow foxtail, Himalayan blackberry, and ornamental hawthorn dominated the vegetation. Trace amounts of sword fern and vetch were also present. Soils were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2)silty clay loam with dark brown (7.5YR 4/4) redox concentrations and oxidized root channels to 5 inches. From 5 to 12 Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 Page 7 Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Delineation March 31, 1998 inches, soils were a dark gray (10YR 4/1)with dark brown (7.5YR 4/4) redox concentrations. Soils were saturated to 12 inches, and depth to free water was 2 inches. Although Plot 5 met the soils and hydrology criteria, Plot 5 was determined to be non-wetland based on a lack of a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation. Sample Plot 6 was located in the southern portion of the site, south of Summer Creek. Vegetation was dominated by meadow foxtail and tall fescue, with Himalayan blackberry as a subdominant. Soils were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silt loam or silty clay loam to 16 inches. Below 10 inches faint mottling was present. Soils were moist. Plot 6 was determined to be non-wetland based on a lack of a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, soil chroma of 2 with only faint mottles, and no hydrology indicators. 3.2 Area Two - SW Grant Street Site The SW Grant Street site contains four emergent wetland areas (Wetlands 2A, 2B, 2C & 2E) associated with Fanno Creek, two on the east side of the creek and two on the west side. Wetland 1 A is located in the western portion of the site on the east side of Fanno Creek(Sample Plot 2). Vegetation was dominated by bentgrass,with small amounts of tall fescue and quack grass. Soils were a very dark grayish brown to dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2 &4/2) sandy silt loam with dark yellowish brown(10YR 4/4) redox concentrations and dark gray (5Y 4/1)depletions to 10 inches. Shallow 0.1 inch ponding was present,and soils were saturated to the surface. Plot 2 was determined to be wetland based on a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, soil chroma of 2 with mottles, and hydrology. Uplands adjacent to Wetland IA (Sample Plot 1) were dominated by tall fescue and bentgrass, with small amounts of quack grass, creeping buttercup, and dock. Soils were a very dark grayish brown to dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2 & 4/2) sandy silt loam with dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) redox concentrations and dark gray (5Y 4/1) depletions to 10 inches. Soils were saturated to the surface. Although Plot 1 met the soils and hydrology criteria, Plot 1 was determined to be non- wetland based on a lack of a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation. No sample plots were placed in Wetland 2B or the back water slough area(Wetland 2C). Wetland 2B is an emergent wetland located on a terrace on the east side of Fanno Creek. Vegetation is dominated by small-fruited bulrush, creeping buttercup, bentgrass, and American speedwell. The sparsely vegetated back water slough area is located on the west side of Fanno Creek. Uplands adjacent to the slough were dominated by Himalayan blackberry and English ivy, with small amounts of climbing nightshade. Wetland 2E is located in the eastern portion of the site,on the west side of Fanno Creek(Sample Plot 3). Vegetation was dominated by reed canarygrass and Oregon ash,with a small amount of climbing Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 Page 8 Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Delineation March 31, 1998 nightshade, Soils were a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) silt loam alternating with layers of sand to 10 inches. Soils were saturated to the surface. Plot 3 was determined to be wetland based on a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, low soil chroma of 1, and hydrology. Uplands adjacent to Wetland 2E were dominated by Douglas fir, Oregon white oak, and Himalayan blackberry. 3.3 Area Three - Dolan Property/SW Main Street Site The Dolan property/SW Main Street site contains an emergent wetland(Wetland 3) associated with Fanno Creek which extends east of the creek across the majority of the site. Vegetation is dominated by reed canarygrass,with small amounts soft rush,Douglas' spirea,Oregon ash, and willow. Several upland islands are present within the wetland area adjacent to the creek. These upland areas are dominated by dense thickets of Himalayan blackberry, rose, and ornamental hawthorn. A pond (assumed to be a mitigation site) is present in the northern portion of the site. An inflow to the pond is present in the northeast portion of the site, and an outflow to Fanno Creek is present at the southwest corner of the pond. Dominant vegetation includes reed canarygrass, soft rush, pondweed, Douglas' spirea, and willow. Vegetation at Sample Plot 2, located in the northwest portion of the site, was dominated by reed canarygrass,with a small amount of willow. Soils were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silt loam with dark gray (10YR 4/1) depletions at 10 inches below the surface. Soils were saturated to the surface, and the depth to free water was 5 inches. Plot 2 was determined to be wetland based on a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, soil chroma of 2 with mottles, and hydrology. Sample Plot 3 was located southwest of the mitigation pond and west of the outflow to Fanno Creek. Vegetation was dominated by reed canarygrass,with a small amount of Himalayan blackberry. Soils were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) silt with no redox concentrations to 4 inches. From 4 to 16 inches, soils were a black (10YR 2/1) very stiff clay with yellow concretions. Soils were saturated to 4 inches. Plot 3 was determined to be wetland based on a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, low soil chroma of 1, and hydrology. Upland areas adjacent to the wetland boundary in the northwest portion of the site (Sample Plot 1) were dominated by reed canarygrass. Small amounts of Himalayan blackberry, Nootka rose, and Oregon ash were also present. Soils were a very dark grayish brown(10YR 3/2)sandy silt loam with no redoximorphic soil features at 10 inches below the surface. Soils were saturated at the surface only. Plot 1 was determined to be non-wetland based on a soil chroma of 2 with no mottles, and no hydrology indicators. Upland conditions were also documented at Sample Plot 4 at the top of bank. Reed canarygrass dominated the vegetation, and a trace amount of Himalayan blackberry was present. Soils were a very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) sandy silt loam with no redoximorphic soil features to 10 Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 Page 9 Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Delineation March 31, 1998 inches. Below 10 inches, soils became a very dark brown(10YR 2/2) clay. Soils were saturated at the surface only. Plot 4 was determined to be non-wetland based on a soil chroma of 2 with no mottles, and no'hydrology indicators. 3.4 Area Four- SW Ash Avenue Right-of-Way Site The SW Ash Avenue right-of-way site contains a total of five wetland areas(Wetlands 4A, 4B, 4D, 4E & 4F) on the west side of Fanno Creek, including four emergent wetlands and one forested wetland. Upland areas were disturbed, and were dominated by Himalayan blackberry, reed canarygrass, ornamental hawthorn, and black hawthorn. Wetland 4D (Sample Plot 2) is a small isolated emergent wetland dominated by reed canarygrass. Soils were a very dark gray (10YR 3/1) silty clay loam at 10 inches below the surface. Scattered ponding was present, and soils were saturated to the surface. Plot 2 was determined to be wetland based on a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, low soil chroma of 1, and hydrology. Upland areas (Sample Plot 1) adjacent to wetlands were dominated by Himalayan blackberry and black hawthorn. Soils were a very dark grayish brown(10YR 3/2) silty clay loam with dark brown (7.5YR 4/4) redox concentrations and dark gray (5Y 4/1) depletions to 10 inches. Soils were saturated to the surface, and depth to free water was 4 inches.Although Plot 1 met the soils and hydrology criteria, Plot 1 was determined to be non-wetland based on a lack of a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation. No Sample Plots were located in Wetlands 4A, 4B, 4E, or 4F. Wetland boundaries were determined by changes in hydrophytic vegetation. Wetlands 4A and 4E are emergent wetland mitigation sites dominated by reed canarygrass, broad-leaf cattail, and soft rush. Wetland 4B is a mixed emergent/forested wetland dominated by Oregon ash with a small stream dominated by small-fruited bulrush, reed canarygrass, and a trace of soft rush. Wetland 4F is an emergent wetland dominated by reed canarygrass. Vegetation noted on the four site areas is listed in Appendix B. 4 WETLAND DETERMINATION CONCLUSION Eleven areas meeting the three wetland criteria were delineated on the four site areas in the vicinity of the proposed pedestrian/bicycle trail. Wetland boundaries were surveyed; however, wetland acreage was not calculated in this study. Wetland determination data sheets are included in Appendix A, and Figures 6 through 9 show the wetland boundaries and sample plot locations. Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 Page 10 Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Delineation March 5, 1998 The proposed project will keep impacts to wetlands to the minimum; the trail alignment will be modified to avoid wetlands where feasible. Once the final trail alignment is determined, impacts to wetlands must also be determined. If any wetlands will be impacted by the trail construction, the City must apply for a Section 404 Removal/Fill permit. The services provided under this contract as described in this report include professional opinions and judgements based on data collected. These services have been provided according to generally accepted practices of the environmental profession. Wetland boundary delineation is an inexact science, and different individuals may disagree on exact boundaries. The boundaries drawn in this report represent our best professional judgement after examination of the site conditions and background information. Our report and conclusions must be confirmed by the Oregon Division of State Lands and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to site-development. Please contact the undersigned with any questions about the enclosed information. Report prepared by: 1' le Stel-Cci "6'1 Stacy N. Benjamin C. Mirth Walker, P Biologist Wetlands Program Manager Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 Page 11 Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Delineation March 31, 1998 5 REFERENCES Environmental Laboratory, 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. Fishman Environmental Services, 1995. City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory "Offsite Option" and Wetlands Assessment. Hitchcock, C.L. and A. Cronquist, 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle. Kollmorgen Instrument Corporation, 1990 revised edition. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Baltimore. Reed, P.B., Jr., 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands:Northwest (Region 9). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report No. 88 (26.9). Reed, P.B., Jr., et al., 1993. Supplement to List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). USDA SCS, 1982. Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station. USDA SCS, 1989. Hydric Soils in Washington County Area, Oregon. US Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1982. Flood Insurance Rate Map, City of Tigard, Oregon, Community-Panel Number 410276 0003 B. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, no date. Beaverton, Oregon National Wetlands Inventory map. 1:58,000 CIR, 8/81. USGS, 1961, photorevised 1984. Beaverton, Oregon 7.5' topographic quadrangle. Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 Page 12 Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Delineation March 31, 1998 6 SITE DATA SHEET Project Name: Fanno Creek Trail Project Number: 97126 Staff: C. Mirth Walker, Christie Galen & Stacy Benjamin Site Visits: January 6 & 16, February 4 & 5, 1998 Applicant: City of Tigard Contact: Duane Roberts, Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 fax 684-7297 Location: Four site areas: Fowler Middle School, SW Grant Street, Dolan property/ SW Main Street, and SW Ash Avenue right-of-way, all located along Fanno Creek, west of SW Hall Boulevard and south of SW Tigard Street in Tigard, Oregon. County: Washington Adjacent Stream: Fanno Creek on site Drainage Basin: Fanno Creek is a tributary to the Tualatin River Flood Plain: Yes, all four site areas are in Zone A3 (areas of 100-year flood) and Zone B (areas between 100- and 500-year flood) on City of Tigard FEMA/FIRM map Community Panel Number 410276 0003 B (revised 3/1/82) Topography: Elevation of the sites is generally level and ranges from approximately 140 to 150 feet, with steep 10 foot banks sloping down to Fanno Creek. Soils: (13) Cove silty clay loam (hydric) and (30) McBee silty clay loam (hydric Cove and Wapato inclusions) Vegetation: Emergent and forested wetlands, and a variety of upland vegetation communities T/R/S: T1S /R1 W/ Section 34, SE 'A, T2S /R1 W/ Section 2,NE 'A& NW Proposed use: Recreational, undeveloped Present use: Undeveloped Past use: Undeveloped Surrounding areas: Residential, commercial Determination: 11 wetland areas delineated and surveyed; trail alignment will avoid wetlands where feasible Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 Page 13 11) \ :.• I r- (It r _ �-u- :i1- +iii/ra 1 • ,ate—_'=% ;��"�r"=F iiiii”.. .......,,,\A"-:.1 --.1,-4prikelaW‘10) t etztial2g., . \ II li:.),Abc9Hr'--';' ,:',,.itiviriiiiiiirriginera-Litiitni.ri ;i HAe7t ' 4.111. \____,_:_;:;I: . AN\alcuir,,,,71 :„-74 _t clianor r 47;i IN/ �Q�lWWI . u A/ / ■ ' I _J ! i :- �:�.�� ) �'-gyp Iit1 N 1 . 111: - \ • I, \ < f. '� .,t:- ri Area 2 �' " /� . - Area 1 -- -'i .� �� !• �.,., •.�,� .. o� . _ `• • ,gr k � L' ` r' `/'off\ di ° rr \' io- /:4 . NI k�•i • J .. r....l � ��— ' �' -s%`� / .• Area 3 'i`A� ���L�;� per✓ •,'IlL— 0 , ' "-\:.4, • ). -1(", . -AS Silkw -,,,,,,,,,,N,NN,-- ye, %, 11, :**"‘•---1)\\411 r'47*-5`-/`(- . Fit 'r. 1 10 F ;--;-„-tot ii bari).: t t, ..s, PP(. \ iN \--- 8----c.a.s!„,,,,,t r ars--L-r-- A. pf,, ,,,,iarasee," . 4sAti44, ,,,r rirre.::-..---<, I: rtilid611W-. i fiefr lS I \ `" �-'_ Area 4 1�s9`1 C�� .i i Iresk 0'4.1 .5 lits./4 itri-149"clat:'1..- ' ' %-c8,0% :".2,),10°.;___ 77iti 1 J.' miciirt„ :±rt,"(�; w ! 'ice-° r i ! 1 ir alma t' 4_. .AL rix",1<z41( ° rt;:: tgrat% 00 . \rPPt i •• ��b/1� • i / .,1.: mN .� _�_— zoo • ..r ! FøPtSt , wo 1,-17!•J , CI: I 0gii. �� ,�2,< iii i\Vl.. 4 LEGEND .NS►W Fanno Creek Trail Area I - Fowler School Site DRAWN: s Benjamin Wetland Delineation Area 2 - SW Grant St. Site APPROVED: M.Walker Area 3 - Dolan Property/SW Main St. Site Area 4 - SW Ash St. Right-of-Way Site DATE- Main 19vs- SITE LOCATION MAP SCALE: 1 inch=2,000 feet con,,,//ono:ne<otagy and - aw,attiauTa Bement Figure # 1 e.•. enno�<ow s<n�u. Source: USGS Beaverton,Oregon Topographic Q N""" .' 4von„a�"°g;zosib u304 Quadrangle, 1961,photorevised 1984 eoa Project # 97126 (503)324-0333 , , y . . .. /O G .: . ♦ + l• \/� i. . RoltnA ' ra Geuve; -. , --_ V• � /A`� c v (7 ' - ' C a • • ..+. t t1 • i' ` , =r t' 0641-7:(7 R3OWZ=—a i_ce- " r \\ T'. POZt _ w 2' u = • PEMIY ^e 111•-...., // 9 '0 t ten.. ry - � ' � � I .34 '\,,_ ,I.;-• r 7?-Pe.MiW. - to 1. _ ... " �:is? ' ��' .' Br,.. 3`v ,t _\•� -.y.:•s:•., s .f?oa-' A\ E I ' ' ''-'PgMIy :;z ...y.„.--7:- _- `••• •:! ,• . .'� n� a`•`:�� .��\s-'F� ..P t •I\ir •• �,,?tll ...• :P'�.:/„ _ �..•.Eas-FC`[-; .+l • --.....•;1 'A �. - PM /t%)J) •oOyNZwo--:" .' - • :..:1�#. ' -• ea'' •' .-• ..,.•1 ---X--+,1 "PPOI E<, s z- \y t • r• <w I`��� • 7 i. � �.• ^~ � :,-,Ale c: �� �, e -• I.;1r,t:..P0 , . \ -,.-/ 5-- \ .�`•_ _ _ •.'••4...�FQIR Ci.4 ntA .+ Iy:4a. - ol/,•,- • , .,y ; ,f -°'BEMIY els I,•* .: . . �F•.. EM ti.. I� rt Atha.�. „ .: r J'' .. /�7- - . svosar. I l`-re 4,. . "- (.= 'a�r7.^ ' , �'.�'%,• 1MY;) a.'• vy,gt //4 zip ✓ °-- PY:' • .a I ;, ..,,,...,9%.1 / l :.t 1,.., s F t l `'J� './ '� yOY,� Iii IFS ' :, .�• �• � .}..;-'7- �. �'" O � \\\\N\\ ' •, i-- /'• � ,tJ - 1<,0 ° KLh . -- r .-dam � '• l�1 %' ;. ; f Is ;- .t ,f' �2 "e[!s�rIDtri ° fin,. r.r� %F01�% v�� • -'✓ It-E,---- 1•,--7,;i5�!/,.Sj/a q�*3;e<i+'� t III;i BM•.; /,�_.,- i � _ i ,--c--, M / • ..„. ,• 77 f c Y,^� tI fr i 7 W- '-- w# re/— ,m 7-7 5 7 4 - iy OI _..1 - '1 T.'7✓-.° \• '' \�� l it' / s'• :` �s . t. i\i., \ ,� 'OF0IY eaeita _' aG i ,/ / /� - om- e i lI { i f i >• Lam_ 'L / 1 / 4 • ier it, -,, I,4 ,24„ �— .1 ^ .'I 1 1n+ �� ✓,'`' ,.i Qom. f 1:==<->-.:::,,C"'45' . • „' ' .-7- _ "_/`� Ai = • rf,:/sn'FLEA: -a. MIY, lY WKLk ----,-._;:-%-:�, ,ter ,_.,•,, \q s - . L / ° I . 2001' L.-171; K?', • 1 is — _ ...LLLllF///---iii444 ' 'x/ t s"PJIvzy„-_____ I IIti 12 I (i1 LEGEND ,0„ R3OWZ-Riverine,upper perennial,open water, 441 Fanno Creek Trail intermittently exposed/permanent DRAWN: S.Benjamin _ Wetland DelllleatiOii PEM1 W-Palustrine,persistent,emergent, intermittently flooded/temporary APPROVED: M.Walker PFO1 W-Palustrine,broad-leaved deciduous,forested DATE March 199!__ NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP intermittently flooded/temporary SCALE: l inch_2,000 feet copinmmw, eeemrye„d namralre.ource management Figure # 2 FWmen Environmental Services Source:USFWS Beaverton,Oregon NW!Quadrangle, ' 4 NW Sixth Avenue• 304 1:58,000 CIR, 8/81 gCM . 43 S60e (503)224-0333 Project # 97126 P'r' / �~ •��® .yy.. :{,,. CortleT1 /x ra�.'w".' -tyR. w,airit• 1 • of-e: ' 1* -'t'r .4 Th"-,.:4. F, t ;i ° it '"�" ix' api i apt ;Al-j 2Yj?17FJ{z /� iN•"n ',, Y r('i , may' v. .z. ',.pu.•a58 : sf- .„. : Y q, C , +4e 45A 45A 13 _ - al w 1 � i. "�/r . . .tea :21 � • Y' ,, •F ,i b" -- 4F 4 ` ti ya` zn 378.34 " :'a+la�''}t-:s- 4- 3� <r3 ee. 71-is•.:,. .�' , .@..X E.. ..” , Y i .,z1 ..a." iv.�, l P 1, .. `jv`A �,,,'4 vl r� +f. • • ?. {lea �r'` r b 13 t„, rat 7 z "; a' 3A"'}. � ,M+' ••• �� 2 � yas` y� i jj�� 524+.. 7 '1.\ -----4,4"..,:, +h if 'tt �_ (F r � i. s .Sf ,Tfj I-7.z. ¢-A,.>, xk?.y°s�W s� i ♦'J` sw' p... .6 r jr 49..r, . �. �At .d ro"%%∎. i „y`1 A*i. And ci ; 4 .1. .r (,.� ewe 4asvr e 'i� -'Y.4 g'��j'M;ti /� /S `i.�F' 1. VI VI i �1' 1 [ u ' i� +ICY �+ r w. ,s �� S o. H'^ / `t T '4i. `` (x.:.:{1 ['' ..: t •tt- s7xdb Y ise ti ,,,,, „ \/ ''a �• i�j•(f 4 1TSt > +L . .-Arm .* tx' p ::. ,.a... ' l ?'; Mel si�:�6. �./. jyi'� \�l 4 , ®sret345B%•ss� t ga r 3� t.' L• i/ pi . ,4`..-X s_.a�,.\7C:, . .,thr....„, .,„eif , .;.: ..„s r1/4„, .401; #1 -IsC/7:1-f:_ e. ' ‘r - -,-,' :,.•:4"..t..,-„,!Vigit r z,4n,t r• t-".w -0112-/af 7/4 r,_, 2 ,. � l 1`) . -" .^ P..+'fi t1Ti / r j�� �L YMtr 4g 1 J.K :� 1. ¢9 i 13781 Ark. 1'• ” .h ri 45�x4vs " .cu :::}.3,=,i an ` ' t 5. . - t z< v + c ( V4,1;.(-1_, -t, 1` . I r x B ...:',;',Ni., f( rt 9n'- Y 178. T c Y { ,,2/'� `4 378 St -(%-,.:i '" 4.Y fir/rift 5 ,..22'' s =.• ' ! v �`• r _ %mil 7 y3A - f! L v �`. . ., it 4 '•• :37.1;t J't.,4` ,•.il 37A; 'e 1.36-t 22 u,l 3 B. 1'?� 11C G 1 1'� r�S 3B ' f t37B } .5Q u! 1 dtir 70 ^_a.z2 �.: 1.. 21.6 t. P. 12:7 37A �I'1 �' LEGEND ms Fanno Creek Trail 13 -Cove silty clay loam(hydric) DRAWN S.Benjamin Wetland Delineation 30-McBee silty clay loam APPROVED M.Walker (hydric Cove&Wapato inclusions) DATE' March 1998 SOILS MAP SCALE. l inch=1,667 feet con.mamt�„trc<„mg„m,d mil...i .o„rcemanagem,. Figure # 3 FiSMmn Bwwmm.nrel Sewice, Source: USDA SCS Soil Survey of Washington County, v aM 434NW egov,n a:'sea o 04 Oregon, 1982, sheet 44 Project # 97126 (503i224 0333 � \_ n 1 1 m sW N 3 V+ 1S�Jly �d E' W l SCprf $iiiPij) zpNE s �iA fir$' ,r, 0 ZONE 6 LX -� to tt.,3 R1Nf feAA➢ ST _ P ease 4 yON 70::017144, iAEFT `�•p SjY O U i yONt 6 '� a/ylyl Z a •� 4rl FR(` ,,n zONEO .> ,/ �a� 4(• 3 NE Pt _ 5+ ���3c'b.. ti, n .� ONE fl y ��Itll\h1 � tY \ V OE S E1 CL our" fl � f N : ( w WEST ZOtAE , �2 � 6 fOH �toot GV0E5O G A k5OM ON£ � Pt ,' ST / . ZONE fl �W z y �� o y, rts ss T e`5o /riO�.``�'2/s ( 100 C p)A. ACNUr ,� r���s V ZONEfl _ r 074,,3 F �W 4- Ow _ Qql 9� Y (--\ $ R cev�a' � ?'' 0y, R v ' °� .- pN£G v F 1 s �, �y'A "Y r. Z - i ci'' s„, pR s �"' r 514 3- Sy. k�xal, ° anno C� lx�ea�iOZ�GI Eo- Z U 11 ° 4- �1 P w3 51etl y� PPRK 0"SiN ze°4 sW s.8an art`'-%" Vj,'O FiQ, 91�,�6 . • eA ri pg,{'"�' wa1-� solute/0-CI e�I Sfle^".\,e'l pT0}eC't R��R()vtp. /'c019n Gons°nah'ral resourc vo rufh o"99io4::t LE� tnt <3; 2A a 3(letarn eat 0°a OATS'• inc ;toe s � �; q5" \ Leo's •A�33 ooa,ba$eeie�ati�or d5p0.y 01100 year of tine 14o_Yeat 1100-an scA�� Zone A3, me.— ee�* 111u's tl p�e1 �0n Aseesbetw o{T gaz 1g%2-Cp0.gm e�, d Otet n, M*C�tY licatt soince.F 10bectkkOrl6 0038 _ll-----.—__ —I --*1 osr " \ /I F It�1 I I/ I / , it II I Il 4, g I - 'fin � I I IIl I ' / fit) • i__ / j //J fl - , k seI a I N✓oF I i /' / /, / .. I ! )/may^ N / ,,,,,:c, nta4.. ' K % / ,// '�/` /N / , i/ y _ 1''. / / i/ ..e)< >� V ,. .�' { '_ 0 fa '; / , d'�'� -6.a✓ ,re: I i' yr?' y H __ 11 w �) v , :Y; ays j I _ /' li \: Z. 1 I1 i>. I •d \/ - IF. __ I L.I_I .1_ 1 - . / AI�: / , F. f i 1_17: 7 i l I L1_� l� 1 1 ,e-, 0.04; I I J 11- TT i I fp It ii . // , - , -1 1111 I<<ll, ,�..I I ' ' L(_I I-( 1--1-11 I I I 1 LEGEND Wetlands Fanno Creek Trail DRAWN: s_M3en;amin Wetland Delineation - - - - Streams APPROVED: M.Walker — Resource Unit Boundary DATE _March 1998_ TIGARD LOCAL WETLANDS INVENTORY SCALE: I jech px.700 feet ComWmnO m ecolog w,d ""P,rolecowtemanageme"1 Figure # 5 Source: City of Tigard Local Wetlands Inventory ' - Fishman Environmental Services g ry Q IAN P tZ ghee V 9'1209 3600300 "Offsite Option"and Wetlands Assessment, 1995 so3uze-onnn Project # 97126 05 0009 ossd'3 S- en34'•nsQ'.a3m 010\R rhos 3_ cd\3 S.N1 y h� 064 1 old �, �oafoza Qt�a a��� C " h 1 yo id 9ZZL • ta. \ \c;\ \ , st4oi3"4°°S4 o asp �t��Z�taza ° ���,� pv ' a 311 u�k am j• C�� / �_� gata`s ate. ��„P„ o \\\ 11.11 o y0'� l„ ,fi v.m''a rs ems_ !` 7 '� '”try '`� poip�,/ "Vw-�� O �(lAelA f..� sI /^ ,srm t 4A �'/� �� Y � tT:141)” ,ob o o QtNI its < wF // A \ 3' vAMn va. ■�ypp.c, �� \s �� \ . ■ Vilikttir!\ `, v9 �\ . v v-. Y// \ i ` r,P«a. 0 ONNbiv.. __. �wna n ed tr »oro'. �>y \ s2 � \ \ . \ \1`\ - E 0 : \ `\ M11 \ hp 3� �._�..� _._�. .rte ��doi yp16 - -- us ''--- ---:-. -------- a�i.saiela°ssd ryt suen3P`nECi'.aazn°S .:03S ,` iv-„(64 (1- ?a e. Gy� 3 /S106. .0,410 •'1r1 aOrt1. ' uaOS oiy��°y,_iriD33$ .�aaz� s y�OWAIN �� �'� • /// a, / ' / / 7 /4.,/ -- ^ am/// , / / N _ Y9 " �T_ 'C'``l \ ` v sA X13 ` .. �„r.f �.�) . ., •,,� .. a 7 At,v ac's \ /,-0. ; )� \ . am i l t , ° ` . ∎, � w, / , d yF t �n,. M. -,. a / �: \ p : a 8 1 '. fir' .� t; a. � ,.- - \w� .A�� x lee"L.-P °.d. .,w+ � x+� - -� r v - n ? 3„,--",..)._9)-,J °'. °` .o........,,.,... ,vs m a ♦ � `°`°t , ^, �'j�` "=' ,� moo, o N _ � / 1)it:[�„1V V r ,n _!fit »- u..a.:w,., °' ,en,j > .. ,. -b "� � m^'.: ` I w, ,'- ;:�° /; ten" ., I(/ / , 11 j /�i/.,�, a�',"o,'d• (' !7 v/ z_ - i517- -- p . ,7. ! , t3 1- .._____ 1 0A,satEwossd'V susNar.nQQ'.aazIlOS 8619ZIZ , Atlas s°0. ova 0. . ' -"` 866[4 4'I Qov�y _=iaxl m Vt 0 \Y1 97,I L6#aaaCpzd r d �uaa`s VS�� a OMy "�" SgoWn L1'OisyS� 9 MS t�x�.xaaz� 0�3 wylos)�yis a t 1� �oi�eau1t°Q :-, �,�r' a "r of z ,�\�yti / , / / ,/ v r, r / UP, / N4 ` , / a.Pva"Vie. V,\ //( / trv^Y'.,w.v r\,eR+l � K`tMl_. � �s ip ».� / 1 VM'< wX• ( '� W o- )<4"--,/ , ., � rmr ,r m • „..ip. /' / 5` \\ Vii ,,m. cgiv,;:cr ■ i \\' en N.i\clet/An w„1,„1.,,,,,t.,„,:....::, , c, / J � ) as¢ ... N33J ONNVe rm',''' .r' .� POW.:"”", o n''r,nn ep yyy API 1 4 J wx �J J X '' ✓ \ 0 4 "'" ii/ .V,";0+01,o; oar.' ,44', it s zs y1 ♦74R � s ro\ \ L \2 ,, v \\, ', onmo x aursnXC u a^a .as7 .,< �. aen�s r"„`•" io`os eoX,oa[�s o � Area Four AfCa 1 feP �.,.. ...° j \\ a., aw.p /, 1,<nrt\\,. \ ______------4?Li/ PLOT 4 ir.o uPLPA7 in,A■r7„:H 1 ( ,Z51p SWE4�x59�t]>- wkTL1NND \ �Q PLoT\3 PLOTa \\ '���� ETLAND � ..,,.,. \ \ - AlSO ASwEBXXXNl.0 951RZ E. u CnpLA»p / \ �. WesIPND \ e�° (.4PLAlyO /” wW��LAND / \ 'I \ / Wr�LAND \ LAPLNNV / \ \ W� \ h3-o11„--,_-, L \ / W ECLAND\ \ / CHEEKS .,r, w \ \ \! N ssyd' f \\ LE END �L-* DRAWN: S.Benjamin, Fanno Creek Trail Wetland Delineation AREA THREE-DOLAN PROPERTY/SW MAIN STREET SITE& APPROVED: -M.Walker ___ AREA FOUR-SW ASH STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY SITE. DATE: March 1.998 __ WETLAND MAP AND SAMPLE PLOT LOCATIONS Figure#9 Project# 97126 SCALE: s shown .. _ $ Source:David Evans&Associates,Inc.2128198 _A APPENDICES APPENDIX A: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEETS APPENDIX B: VEGETATION OF THE FANNO CREEK TRAIL SITES Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 Page 23 APPENDIX A: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEETS Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - 1987 MANUAL Project #: 9MIYoSite: Fowler 5c4 ci ArcalCounty:waskir -, State: 02 Date: /5/q Plot: -�- Applicant/Owner: C-i+c./ Qf Tfo/ara. Sect.(1/4)34 5E Township IS Range IW Wet /611 Plot Location: -f ill arca a,; -I0 brr , -iop o f S)ope Topographic Location: (o " kurNn-,ocKS + ac Pr"SSimS Do normal environmental conditions exist?Ct N Explain: Are soils_ vegetation_ hydrology_significantly disturbed? Explain: COI A -6 III VEGETATION *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. Herb Stratum (%total cover: tao ) (5 ft. radius) Shrub/Sapling Stratum (%total cover: ) (5' rad.) Q Alopecc.aLA$ Pia rz�S `0 FAcw 1. Pubu.3 a,'scal o r- -1< FAcbt 2. Pima larr5 arurnc\.trNacea 1O FACIA) 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. Tree Stratum (%total cover: ) (30 ft. radius) 7. 1. 8. 2. 9. 3. Remarks: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): %1 = 100°70 Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? lasp NO NWI Class SOILS / Mapped unit names moo\.e 5(1-frt/ curl Inar ,- Matches Profile? Y N Taxonomy: \.)C-r it Maps&q otIS Drainage Class: par19 Ara,-r-N-A Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Texture, Struct., Other 0-16 In'42 h fain+ rtia+l-S ,Sic.L Histosol Reducing Conditions (test) Hi. Organic Cont. Surf. Layer _Histic Epipedon Gleyed Organic Streaking Sulfidic Odor Mottled (w/i 10") Organic Pan Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concretions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils List Remarks: .Sof berme 10Y2 3/3 ti15 ' 5 oc.r 4 in PNAR �icla @lU"c�ley cS+ac4ino] Hydric Soil Criterion/Indicators Met? YES NO HYDROLOGY Depth of inundation: — Depth to free water: — Depth to saturation: 0.-4i seeps: —" 1° Indicators 2° Indicators 2° Indicators Inundated Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12" Local Soil Survey Data )( Saturated in upper 12" _Water-stained leaves FAC-Neutral Test Water Marks Recorded Data Available (aerials, gauge)? Explain: Drift Lines Other: Sediment Deposits Remarks: Sa-ura-1;a-, prrr i P1fafrom Drainage Patterns Wetland Hydrology Criterion / Indicators Met? YE NO DETERMINATION: Is this plot a Wetland? YES NO Comments: Determined by: CAA., --{'1,. .v{.(a(Ex t 51-acts (3enSacmin Fishman Environmental Services rev 9197 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - 1987 MANUAL Project#:crila67 Site: Fa-ohs Soinco)ACca i County: &- ;i-- ,4- State: OR Date:W5/778 Plot: Applicant/Owner:Ci-1 o rci7ara Sect.(1/4) 311 3111/4.5E Township I S Range 1Lo U, Plot Location: ^' IOC f Plo-I- 1 Topographic Location: ^" 3' be-1w R04-1, 6"1-,,„ocX3 1 c\.e P'n S57,S Do normal environmental conditions exist?® N Explain: Are soils vegetation_ hydrology_significantly disturbed?()Explain: VEGETATION *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. Herb Stratum (% total cover:/WI ) (5 ft. radius) Shrub/Sapling Stratum (% total cover: ) (5' rad.) (�. p�,al a rs arun�'r acea (oo FACL) 1. CD A-I o c cu tt.3 prad-ceSrs _9_0__ F2a1 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. Tree Stratum (% total cover: ) (30 ft. radius) 7. 1. 8. 2. 9. 3. Remarks: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): /� = /C 7o Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? dr, NO NWI Class PEAI SOILS / Mapped unit name: (oVe-Si-k1 GI ati )o arm Matches Profile? Y N Taxonomy: U ark'C idapla9(Ao11S Drainage Class:pooc kj ca.f'ainea, Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Texture, Struct., Other O -Co OW 3/D no pmo&S o cL 6s1b__ JoYQ 3/1 co, f-rnJO?R5/3 ,?Icy @l6"1o(G Sh Uac1 _Histosol Reducing Conditions (test) Hi. Organic Cont. Surf. Layer Histic Epipedon X Gleyed Organic Streaking Sulfidic Odor X Mottled (w/i 10") Organic Pan Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concretions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils List Remarks: Hydric Soil Criterion/Indicators Met? E NO HYDROLOGY /, Depth of inundation: — Depth to free water: Depth to saturation: O _7 seeps: 1° Indicators 2° Indicators 2° Indicators Inundated X Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12" Local Soil Survey Data x Saturated in upper 12" _Water-stained leaves FAC-Neutral Test Water Marks Recorded Data Available (aerials, gauge)? Explain: Drift Lines Other: Sediment Deposits Remarks: 3 ra-h r', fc-o-'m prtG'p i I a-h m Drainage Patterns Wetland Hydrology Criterion/Indicators Met?4 NO DETERMINATION: Is this plot a Wetland? tay NO Comments: LuL bourla f lag a-, Cc9e of 12(.41T Determined by:CMW t5S Fishman Environmental Services rev 9/97 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - 1987 MANUAL Project#:93'D6 Site: Fc..cicr ..Se col 4rca1 County:UlaS),i tm9 *.n State:OP Date:a/3/9n Plot: 3 Applicant/Owner: C.(1 3'ti of -1?9ara Sect.(1/4)311 5&" Township 15 Range IL) Wet //,���� Plot Location: "1 300/ L.) of P14 t r 15 of !Dour c;ati j ..j2la9 4 Topographic Location: r'1;„(.._ LAE a/cpe Do normal environmental conditions exist?(YON Explain: Are soils_ vegetation_ hydrology_ significantly disturbed?©Explain: VEGETATION *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. Herb Stratum (% total cover: (DD ) (5 ft. radius) Shrub/Sapling Stratum(%total cover: ) (5' rad.) C Alopecu2 A3 pca-)-ec a;S FACIA) 1. 2. ()kalarrS arur-a,'nacea FACW 2. 3. Fes-luca arum nacea ID FAC - 3. 4. U r c- .Sp 4-i — 4. 5. 5. 6. Tree Stratum (%total cover: ) (30 ft. radius) 7. 1. 8. 2. 9. 3. Remarks: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): Vl = too% Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? ES NO NWI Class SOILS U� Mapped unit name: ( tic Si 1-j U ark Joann, Matches Profile? Y N Taxonomy:Umrht. )4ap)a9clol)S Drainage Class: poorI(7 cX( ainccX Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Texture, Struct., Other o-5 IoYR /a no roll Srt, , .5 -9 ?.5W 3/a -lec..>,fr„e,faof rlks 3;GC q l y ida N3 few, nP fa r.� rnol+S S r L Histosol Reducing Conditions (test) Hi. Organic Cont. Surf Layer Histic Epipedon Gleyed Organic Streaking _Sulfidic Odor Mottled(w/i 10") _Organic Pan _Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concretions (w/i 3",>2mm) On Hydric Soils List Remarks: Hydric Soil Criterion/ Indicators Met? YES NTO HYDROLOGY Depth of inundation: Depth to free water: Depth to saturation: 0-5 seeps: 1° Indicators 2° Indicators 2° Indicators Inundated Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12" Local Soil Survey Data X Saturated in upper 12" Water-stained leaves FAC-Neutral Test Water Marks Recorded Data Available (aerials, gauge)? Explain: Drift Lines Other: Sediment Deposits Remarks: Sat.A(Catsa", "arm prec pi-la-4-cm _Drainage Patterns Wetland Hydrology Criterion/ Indicators Met? e NO DETERMINATION: Is this plot a Wetland? YES 0 tomer-C° 1" +-Lrs,n,ocl[cj Comments:a"4" 60A-ctn._ ,� - b=ccnmes )00 76 I7:+,• p 3 a cs4 , Awe_ 4090 y/ 4" • e �'"541<yIN Determined by: CAW 1-S13 Fishman Environmental Services rev 9/97 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET- 1987 MANUAL Project#:(MX Site: Fa of crr S I Areal County:L1..51 kmc A-u, State:as Date:R/..5M Plot: Applicant/Owner: Gill o 1P9arr4 Sect.(1/4)3113E Township )S Range )W / U. Plot Location: Lie-S-1-ern (oer-I-cam n f 5^1� Topographic Location: n r ea fir— of Slope, Do normal environmental conditions exist?�I N Explain: Are soils_ vegetation_ hydrology_significantly disturbed?DExplain: VEGETATION *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. Herb Stratum (%total cover: 100 ) (5 ft. radius) Shrub/Sapling Stratum (% total cover: 5 ) (5' rad.) 1. Alopccc (.S pra-Icn3ii.S 90 .FAS) 1.G4a+aeo s rmor,r cjna 5 FAct.�d 2.A9rb pc/re rcper-S In FAC- 2. RU.8c,tS c.isco)oC -J-r EALu 3. 1J iCa .sp _ —" 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. Tree Stratum (%total cover: ) (30 ft. radius) 7. 1. 8. 2. 9. 3. Remarks: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): AI/! = /0 0 % Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? 1fP NO NWI Class Pt/"I SOILS Mapped unit name: Coax° Si 1 U )oar*, Matches Profile? Y N Taxonomy: Uec4cC. Naplac7(.AOl)S Drainage Class: ?ooduj elra;re_el Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Texture, Struct., Other Q1(z ID`)R 3�1 (a' r(-rf OW y/Llr/OYR5�lG' )7'i OQG ,SicL Histosol Reducing Conditions (test) Hi. Organic Cont. Surf. Layer • Histic Epipedon .Gleyed Organic Streaking Sulfidic Odor )( Mottled (w/i 10") _Organic Pan Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concretions (w/i 3",>2mm) On Hydric Soils List Remarks: Hydric Soil Criterion/Indicators Met? e NO HYDROLOGY Depth of inundation: — Depth to free water:0- r Depth to saturation:O �)t " seeps: — - 1° Indicators 2° Indicators 2° Indicators Inundated X Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12" Local Soil Survey Data X. Saturated in upper 12" Water-stained leaves FAC-Neutral Test Water Marks Recorded Data Available (aerials, gauge)?Explain: Drift Lines Other: _Sediment Deposits Remarks: Drainage Patterns Wetland Hydrology Criterion / Indicators Met? alb NO DETERMINATION: Is this plot a Wetland? ES) NO Comments: L✓c*lar G - ru.re3 *a -14'r=' _ , Determined by: (MW +553 Fishman Environmental Services rev 9/97 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET- 1987 MANUAL Project#:331:Site: FcA )Ie S64-00I cad County:loas)-0- f) n State:OP Date: 0'588 Plot: 6 Applicant/Owner: Olt/o f t'2' rd Sect.(l/4)34 SE Township IS Range 11.0 Wet / Plot Location: 30' A) o f Piof 4, JO 'N Topographic Location: I la pSlgpe of Flo-)- 4 Do normal environmental conditions exist?© N Explain: Are soils_ vegetation_ hydrology_ significantly disturbed?®Explain: VEGETATION *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. Herb Stratum (% total cover: /Oo ) (5 ft. radius) Shrub/Sapling Stratum (%total cover: /03 ) (5' rad.) (jl Alopeortas pr. -l-enS;s ale Ice FAdU(f) Rubes c scc4or 80 FAW 2. Uto1'a se- -h" — - • sass. at, 0.S FFlC[a-; 3.poItyS}ic .-orr rTmUni4t4rn < EAQA 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. Tree Stratum (%total cover: ) (30 ft. radius) 7. 1. 8. 2. 9. 3. Remarks: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): '/3 = 33°70 Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? YES IO NWI Class SOILS Mapped unit name: Care. 1)-1/4.4 G I oarn Matches Profile? Y N Taxonomy: \) es"-1iC h play cAoU, Drainage Class: poorlC� acau,e..a Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Texture, Struct., Other o-S /o(R3/a fei e4-r"Th7.S4'Q q/Ll .feco of2C SiCL S )� IoYR rte, ,n.r - /v .5 c.L Histosol Reducing Conditions (test) Hi. Organic Cont. Surf. Layer Histic Epipedon Gleyed Organic Streaking _Sulfidic Odor )X Mottled (w/i 10") _Organic Pan Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concretions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils List Remarks: Hydric Soil Criterion/Indicators Met? ` NO HYDROLOGY r� Depth of inundation: -- Depth to free water: Depth to saturation: O-I M a seeps: — 1° Indicators 2° Indicators 2° Indicators Inundated )( Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12" Local Soil Survey Data )( Saturated in upper 12" Water-stained leaves FAC-Neutral Test Water Marks Recorded Data Available (aerials, gauge)? Explain: Drift Lines Other: Sediment Deposits Remarks: _Drainage Patterns Wetland Hydrology Criterion / Indicators Met?(V"4 NO DETERMINATION: Is this plot a Wetland? YES Comments: ('`1a be C...t1- I Determined by: (WAN'`I-513 Fishman Environmental Services rev 9/97 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET- 1987 MANUAL Project#:gq)e Site: FE i)er Sc-Lo0I%(ca.4 County:LJashino/l„) State: oR Date:a/5/98 Plot: 6 Applicant/Owner:Cil[� cf T'o/�d Sect.(1/4) 34 SE Township IS Range IL/ Wet / Plot Location: Sot 1) am per-Ho-, of 3 14e, Sou-{4-, of Sunv,nme-Ctez-le, -'-loo' Li of ro�1 Topographic Location: Do normal environmental conditions exist?(N Explain: Are soils vegetation_ hydrology_ significantly disturbed?)Explain: VEGETATION *Dominant Plant Species , Cover Ind. *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. Herb Stratum (% total cover: 00 ) (5 ft. radius) Shrub/Sapling Stratum (%total cover: I b ) (5' rad.) CO A'.op°cc_,a As pr -4ers)..3 86 PALL dP LAbLA,s A,•3 c.ol or FAG- 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. Tree Stratum(%total cover: ) (30 ft. radius) 7. 1. 8. 2. 9. 3. Remarks: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 1/3 = 3372) Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? YES (0 NWI Class SOILS Mapped unit name: Cope Si 4-(.1 G) )oer n Matches Profile? Y N Taxonomy: 4ic /apla9 CoI1 S Drainage Class: pool it! cXre;nea Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Texture, Struct., Other o (a Io9R 3/) no rTheil S 311 I 0-16 l oWQ 3/a cw,f nc,far,-a- S;c L Histosol Reducing Conditions (test) Hi. Organic Cont. Surf Layer Histic Epipedon Gleyed Organic Streaking Sulfidic Odor Mottled (w/i 10") Organic Pan Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concretions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils List Remarks: Hydric Soil Criterion/Indicators Met? YES TO HYDROLOGY Depth of inundation: Depth to free water: — Depth to saturation: seeps: 1° Indicators 2° Indicators 2° Indicators _Inundated Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12" Local Soil Survey Data Saturated in upper 12" _Water-stained leaves FAC-Neutral Test Water Marks Recorded Data Available (aerials, gauge)? Explain: Drift Lines Other: Sediment Deposits Remarks: Cm° 154- cr')cl Drainage Patterns Wetland Hydrology Criterion / Indicators Met? YES 'O DETERMINATION: Is this plot a Wetland? YES (Na) Comments: • Determined by: CI. t �i� Fishman Environmental Services rev 9/97 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - 1987 MANUAL Project #: Site:C-fan+S-1,- Area 2 County:Wask twy-an State:OR Date:0688 Plot: �- Applicant/Owner:Ci}t1 0� Trgar< Sect.(1/4) a Mu Township aS Range 11) Wet /CD Plot Location:2 'NaF -RA II bang of crteV @ Trojara ana- S+rfa1 Pa(-)4 Topographic Location: floodplaic' Do normal environmental conditions exist? Y N Explain: II a S after Snotc Are soils_ vegetation_ hydrology_ significantly disturbed?DExplain: VEGETATION *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. Herb Stratum (% total cover: Ice ) (5 ft. radius) Shrub/Sapling Stratum (% total cover: ) (5' rad.) Q Fes+uca aa..om nacea 6o FAC.- 1. O Aciro,5-ks sp. a0 Fob FAG 2. 3. A,ropyram repers FAC- 3. 4. Ranc.flce_ luS repenS 1 FAGW 4. 5. Pt2,0heA 5jD.. 3 — 5. 6. Tree Stratum (%total cover: ) (30 ft. radius) 7. 1. 8. 2. 9. 3. Remarks: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): t/a = Soho Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? YES (NO bu+ clasa NWI Class SOILS Mapped unit name: CoUe. Sit-k9 C1 10 arm Matches Profile? Y N Taxonomy: V er+(c Nap)a9uo113 Drainage Class: poor)[/ craincA Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Texture, Struct., Other 0-10 /oYQ 3/a4y/0 ca.,,rnca SY 4.{ew,fine Io?R 4/4 SaSi L Histosol Reducing Conditions (test) Hi. Organic Cont. Surf. Layer Histic Epipedon X Gleyed Organic Streaking Sulfidic Odor X Mottled (w/i 10") Organic Pan _Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concretions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils List Remarks: probe hi4- kara. Pa @ /0'r Hydric Soil Criterion/Indicators Met? ii�ES) NO HYDROLOGY Depth of inundation: Depth to free water: Depth to saturation:SL face seeps: I° Indicators 2° Indicators 2° Indicators Inundated _Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12" Local Soil Survey Data X Saturated in upper 12" Water-stained leaves FAC-Neutral Test Water Marks Recorded Data Available (aerials, gauge)? Explain: Drift Lines Other: _Sediment Deposits Remarks: Drainage Patterns Wetland Hydrology Criterion/ Indicators Met? ES NO DETERMINATION: Is this plot a Wetland? YES C O> Comments: -14-115 bccr Callen Ue9Je*aFfam Determined by: CPm1.J +- CC— Fishman Environmental Services rn 9/97 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET- 1987 MANUAL Project #:97'11 Site:Grect'5t -_A4 a County:Ua3l-,dn9fc,--, State:OR Date: 1//6/98 Plot: Applicant/Owner: Ci-I-o/ o fr arr Sect.(I/4) MO Township DS Range f Lu / U. Plot Location: G r Sotc-14-, o f (J/0+ -2 Topographic Location: f loo d plain r, _ Do normal environmental conditions exist? Y N Explain: 4 cay e S af45nol-° Are soils V vegetation_ hydrology_significantly disturbed? N Explain:c 3-lorbe. 6y c° ' pac+ron F�erhap3 -frcrn Sec,..er Cam5}nc 4 nn VEGETATION *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. Herb Stratum (% total cover: 160 ) (5 ft. radius) Shrub/Sapling Stratum (% total cover: ) (5' rad.) CD Aoras+•s 90 probFAc 1. 2. Fr.S+Uca ana cr°a .5 FAG- 2. 3. A-o/copt/fa. reper-.,S 5 FAC- 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. e Tree Stratum (%total cover: ) (30 ft. radius) 7. 1. 8. 2. 9. 3. Remarks: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 1 = /00% Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? eg, NO NWI Class PENT SOILS Mapped unit name: Cove 3;I GIB 1oarm Matches Profile? Y N Taxonomy: Uer\-;C- i4ap)acuo113 Drainage Class:Nock/ dratnea Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Texture, Struct., Other U-/O" 1o923/a4'11b ron,,ne.1 59 IV/'corn_fre bYP 4/4 5a-5 N.. ca-,cry-cns e lI it Histosol _Reducing Conditions (test) Hi. Organic Cont. Surf. Layer Histic Epipedon X Gleyed Organic Streaking Sulfidic Odor X Mottled (w/i 10") _Organic Pan Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concretions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils List Remarks: Probe re(ctsalta 1o" - ),arc par, Hydric Soil Criterion/Indicators Met? da,NO HYDROLOGY Depth of inundation:O. I u Depth to free water:Sc*(f ce Depth to saturation: -Surface seeps: 1° Indicators 2° Indicators 2° Indicators Inundated Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12" Local Soil Survey Data )( Saturated in upper 12" Water-stained leaves FAC-Neutral Test Water Marks Recorded Data Available (aerials, gauge)? Explain: Drift Lines Other: Sediment Deposits Remarks: X Drainage Patterns Wetland Hydrology Criterion / Indicators Met? 6LES-)NO DETERMINATION: Is this plot a Wetland? te. NO Comments: Determined by: CtrrAO CC Fishman Environmental Services rev 9/97 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - 1987 MANUAL Project#:q?)a Site: (,-fan-1- St. -"tea J County: Loat51,fr,-1-m State: OP Date:)/IL/98 Plot: 3 Applicant/Owner: Cl L. 0 17. ar s Sect.(1/4) NNW Township aS Range IL) s Plot Location: e_ •,. sm. _ si - .ehi _ _ . . a •a So /_ . crec •_ t Topographic Location: f/ooc p)a;n Do normal environmental conditions exist? Y N Explain: 1/ pa3+ SfoLo Are soils_ vegetation_ hydrology significantly disturbed?Explain: VEGETATION *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. Herb Stratum (% total cover: 1o3 ) (5 ft. radius) Shrub/Sapling Stratum (% total cover:„Da ) (5' rad.) Rai ari s aaAn l;nzcea 100 FACW ) Fra)Unus Do FALL' 2. Bohm )can,ar. S FAC-I- 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. Tree Stratum (%total cover: ) (30 ft. radius) 7. 1. 8. 2. 9. 3. Remarks: C.pL .a Uec . 1 5 P.aME, PC-40.1, OUGA Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): /a = IOD% Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? ego NO NWT Class RTh/p0 SOILS Mapped unit name: Cove Si)}c.) C)ac../t1 I oar'O Matches Profile? Y N Taxonomy: Uer+tc )-Iap)a7Lion S Drainage Class: peaky gained Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Texture, Struct., Other IoYR 34 �1 Frmal r cJ co/layers o Histosol Reducing Conditions (test) Hi. Organic Cont. Surf. Layer Histic Epipedon Gleyed Organic Streaking Sulfidic Odor Mottled (w/i 10") Organic Pan Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concretions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils List Remarks: Hydric Soil Criterion/Indicators Met? cg,Mi NO HYDROLOGY Depth of inundation: — Depth to free waterSurfarP Depth to saturationauC face seeps: I° Indicators 2° Indicators 2° Indicators Inundated Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12" Local Soil Survey Data Saturated in upper 12" Water-stained leaves FAC-Neutral Test Water Marks Recorded Data Available (aerials, gauge)? Explain: Drift Lines Other: Sediment Deposits Remarks: Drainage Patterns Wetland Hydrology Criterion / Indicators Met? CESDNO DETERMINATION: Is this plot a Wetland? ES NO Comments: Determined by:j rnL J k CG- Fishman Environmental Services rev 9/97 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - 1987 MANUAL Project#: (0Site:Iolan/Mam3t.-Arca3 County:L?aSkino State:0 Q Date: t/)9A Plot:..1 Applicant/Owner:[io of TroarA Sect.(1/4) AJE Township D3 Range IL/ Wet /Q'* Plot Location: -5oU41 o[ r 1 r i t a�a-l,'o n F'e, .5a.A-14-, ea;..o f Si 4-e Topographic Location: Do normal environmental conditions exista N Explain: Are soils_ vegetation_ hydrology_ significantly disturbed`1 Explain: VEGETATION *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. Herb Stratum (%total cover:)o& ) (5 ft. radius) Shrub/Sapling Stratum (%total cover: A. ) (5' rad.) Phalarrs aun, tnacea Iov FACw 1. Pubes ArSCr)or S PAc . 2. 2. QoSa ncxl Kara -1'r �A 3. 3.FfaXinu3 FAcI.� 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. Tree Stratum(% total cover: ) (30 ft. radius) 7. 1. 8. 2. 9. 3. Remarks: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FAY YJ FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): lI = Ir7o � Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? .i.�� NO NWI Class SOILS Mapped unit name: r1c ace. .37 1+9 GIat/ I oa-rr--, Matches Profile? Y N Taxonomy: <c.rmcslic (a111,'c, HaploXeccihS Drainage Class:1hc erals1j1A sll \rained, Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Texture, Struct., Other in IUYQ 3/a no re- X 5a3 IL Histosol _Reducing Conditions (test) Hi. Organic Cont. Surf. Layer _Histic Epipedon Gleyed Organic Streaking Sulfidic Odor _Mottled (w/i 10") Organic Pan Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concretions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils List Remarks: Sate connprcssea. rim probe Hydric Soil Criterion/Indicators Met? YES (Wth HYDROLOGY 1 Depth of inundation: Depth to free water: Depth to saturation: 4acep s�eps: 1° Indicators 2° Indicators 2° Indicators Inundated Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12" Local Soil Survey Data Saturated in upper 12" Water-stained leaves FAC-Neutral Test Water Marks Recorded Data Available (aerials, gauge)? Explain: _Drift Lines Other: Sediment Deposits Remarks: Drainage Patterns Wetland Hydrology Criterion/Indicators Met? YES NO DETERMINATION: Is this plot a Wetland? YES (NO) Comments: Determined by: Cr'Lj '•• ,-51?) Fishman Environmental Services rev 9/97 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET- 1987 MANUAL Project ft:VIZ Site:J�) 11an��} �rea3 County: State:OP Date:0_6 Plot: Applicant/Owner: (ck1 of Trooacc Sect.(l/4)) a�Township DS Range 16-) / U. Plot Location: 2.5 r cos} o-f plol'1} to' Luc&+- of" irif Ic u `c. Topographic Location: -‘/1 IoWcr Mat- Pict'--i Do normal environmental conditions exist?6)N Explain: Are soils_ vegetation_ hydrology_ significantly disturbed? I�Explain: VEGETATION *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. Herb Stratum (%total cover:I00 ) (5 ft. radius) Shrub/Sapling Stratum (%total cover: S )�(�5�' rad.) O 0-al�x;S zMr,arrt Icx� Ftc-u 1. 5 t?c sp. 3 F c L^- a 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. Tree Stratum (%total cover: ) (30 ft. radius) 7. 1. 8. 2. 9. 3. Remarks: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): ��1 = loo nn Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? NO NWI Classf Efl SOILS Mapped unit name: /`laBee 3i1-114 Uaci /oars Matches Profile? Y N Taxonomy: CurThc.l;c LA!1-cc )4apIoxerollS Drainage Class:f t era}ekiI-en ra;rer\ Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Texture, Struct., Other 10" io? "bia {rr ,,nee-caars e 105'2 41f c<.,cara-rari-; S 3;1- Histosol Reducing Conditions (test) Hi. Organic Cont. Surf Layer _Histic Epipedon Gleyed Organic Streaking _Sulfidic Odor X Mottled (w/i 10") Organic Pan Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concretions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils List Remarks: 53t I Can Hydric Soil Criterion /Indicators Met? E NO HYDROLOGY //,, Depth of inundation: — Depth to free water:`t -5" Depth to saturation:0 40ur seeps: 1° Indicators 2° Indicators 2° Indicators Inundated Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12" Local Soil Survey Data Saturated in upper 12" Water-stained leaves FAC-Neutral Test _Water Marks Recorded Data Available (aerials, gauge)? Explain: Drift Lines Other: Sediment Deposits Remarks: -1'},iot,.nu-I- Drainage Patterns Wetland Hydrology Criterion/ Indicators Met?CD NO DETERMINATION: Is this plot a Wetland? 0-/ES) NO Comments: Determined by: CP-,LJ S 2) Fishman Environmental Services rev.9/97 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET- 1987 MANUAL Project#9J Site:lf)ar,/Main& -Acba3 County. . .... State:OQ Date:DP/Pi&& Plot: 3 Applicant/Owner:Q-k14 Tf r° ; Sect.(1/4) a AJ Township aS Range !W a / U. Plot Location: L5' Sw 4 Ski Corrrr-`7" papa, to' L 1-o-: lam` nc.24-�(9w -inn, CfCcK Topographic Location: Do normal environmental conditions exist?(S) N Explain: Are soils_ vegetation_ hydrology_significantly disturbed?(Explain: VEGETATION *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. Herb Stratum (% total cover: lea ) (5 ft. radius) Shrub/Sapling Stratum (% total cover: 5 ) (5' rad.) b Qlmaixr3 artAn ,r area iw__ FACJAJ 1. Qubuo c\;sco)oC S FPCLi 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. Tree Stratum (% total cover: ) (30 ft. radius) 7. 1. 8. 2. 9. 3. Remarks: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 1II = 10076 Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? I NO NWI Class PE/ SOILS Mapped unit name: McBee- Sri G)ay )o a Matches Profile? Y N Taxonomy: (cz r'-u l i c. 014-c Ua p l o er'o f l 3 Drainage Class:t"noaera ICS L eil ra inca Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Texture, Struct., Other 0"21 /GYP 3/0 no rec\oX 5i il-IG l oYR ali yellow c re or3 vets-14 clad Histosol Reducing Conditions (test) Hi. Organic Cont. Surf. Layer Histic Epipedon Gleyed Organic Streaking Sulfidic Odor X Mottled (w/i 10") _Organic Pan Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concretions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils List Remarks: Hydric Soil Criterion/Indicators Met? 6E. NO HYDROLOGY N Depth of inundation: Depth to free water: - Depth to saturation0-7 seeps: 1° Indicators 2° Indicators 2° Indicators Inundated Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12" Local Soil Survey Data Saturated in upper 12" Water-stained leaves FAC-Neutral Test Water Marks Recorded Data Available (aerials, gauge)? Explain: Drift Lines Other: Catcrnrni, Glad be Je- Sediment Deposits Remarks: Qt.A cShcnabla L 90\COI oo�Ll Drainage Patterns Wetland Hydrology Criterion/Indicators 1\ et' tE> NO DETERMINATION: Is this plot a Wetland? CY.7ES) NO Comments: Determined by: C( -L) '- SO> Fishman Environmental Services rev 9/97 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET- 1987 MANUAL Project#:(Pilo Site: Dolanl/1 ;n,St.-ACra.$County: A �1I 1 State: o2 Date:DP/I MP/ Plot: Applicant/Owner: 0-k1 6.f Tfrr oia . Sect.(1/4) )AU E Township a 5 Range 1 W Wet (T: Plot Location: 16' 500+4, o.� PI c+ 3 , 4 'eaS-1- o f -fop of bam)L Topographic Location: ( - 5 " �6a.re P1oi- 3 Do normal environmental conditions exist? ®N Explain: Are soils_ vegetation_ hydrology_ significantly disturbed?UN Explain: VEGETATION *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. Herb Stratum (% total cover: i(XD ) (5 ft. radiu_s) Shrub/Sapling Stratum (% total cover: +f ) (5' rad.) ® J.- - _. - 100 FAC W 1. Rults Sco1 cf" -J- atUA 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. Tree Stratum (%total cover: ) (30 ft. radius) 7. 1. 8. 2. 9. 3. Remarks: i Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): l = Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? eV NO NWI Class SOILS Mapped unit name: tic Cie e 5 r)Rt.] G I,(4 10 arm Matches Profile? Y N Taxonomy: (LAnmL-d WC (al l,'G Na jDloXcc-oil S Drainage Class:rno a} lc./ t ?ll ar'aIneA Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Texture, Struct., Other o-_r)o 1oYR 3la r- ° r-c ox ,Bast L Ire+ 1r)42 ID no recX f IaP' Histosol Reducing Conditions (test) Hi. Organic Cont. Surf. Layer Histic Epipedon Gleyed Organic Streaking _Sulfidic Odor Mottled (w/i 10") Organic Pan Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concretions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils List Remarks: Hydric Soil Criterion/Indicators Met? YES 0 HYDROLOGY onlc Depth of inundation: — Depth to free water: —' Depth to saturation:-5...+(f seeps: 1° Indicators 2° Indicators 2° Indicators Inundated Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12" Local Soil Survey Data Saturated in upper 12" _Water-stained leaves FAC-Neutral Test Water Marks Recorded Data Available (aerials, gauge)? Explain: Drift Lines Other: Sediment Deposits Remarks: P'lo131` ak . }-a'rh Drainage Patterns Wetland Hydrology Criterion/ Indicators Met? YES 0 DETERMINATION: Is this plot a Wetland? YES NO Comments: Determined by: CP*. +-SC3 Fishman Environmental Services rev 9/97 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - 1987 MANUAL Project#:q-713 Site:AS),Ave. POW - Area County:L)aS},twrk„ State:OP Date:I/6/98 Plot: 1 Applicant/Owner: 64c1 of Tr?ara Sect.(1/4) NZ; Townshipa3 Range IL) Wet /(Uph Plot Location: 10 5L.) of Is, Topographic Location: i n lac A 1 -,corn -1-h;die+ Do normal environmental conditions exist?�Y N Explain: Are soils_ vegetation_ hydrology_significantly disturbed?6)Explain: VEGETATION *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. Herb Stratum (%total cover: ) (5 ft. radius) Shrub/Sapling Stratum (%total cover: 14' ) (5' rad.) 1. �j1 Qc4 usA;scolor- 8o FArf 2. 02 Cra+ae?us dcxx7lasi7 60 PAC 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. Tree Stratum (%total cover: ) (30 ft. radius) 7. 1. 8. 2. 9. 3. Remarks: P1-1.412 ou-1-Sie plo+ Sic CS Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): // 2 = 50% Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? YES @ NWI Class SOILS Mapped unit name: /icBcc S; 1-k9 Claci to ac'm Matches Profile? Y N Taxonomy:Cur,uliC bti-11C Nap/ox-e- -6/13 Drainage Class: rne a41-elc1Zoellara;nea Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Texture, Struct., Other o to loYR3/a Cpr-.,r-,ce\ 9R `I/q4j 5?11/i .5;cL Histosol _Reducing Conditions (test) Hi. Organic Cont. Surf. Layer _Histic Epipedon X Gleyed Organic Streaking Sulfidic Odor A Mottled (w/i 10") Organic Pan Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concretions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils List Remarks: probe ca.npr-cSSeS Soi 1 Hydric Soil Criterion/Indicators Met? . NO HYDROLOGY /, A Depth of inundation: Depth to free water: 7 Depth to saturation:3urface° seeps: 1° Indicators 2° Indicators 2° Indicators Inundated Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12" Local Soil Survey Data Saturated in upper 12" _Water-stained leaves FAC-Neutral Test Water Marks Recorded Data Available (aerials, gauge)? Explain: Drift Lines Other: Sediment Deposits Remarks: Drainage Patterns Wetland Hydrology Criterion/ Indicators Met? dig) NO DETERMINATION: Is this plot a Wetland? YES (NO Comments: / ,,� Determined by: �1 iL C,C, Fishman Environmental Services rev 9/97 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - 1987 MANUAL Project #511,1 Site:A5)-,Ave QoW Afea 4 County: State:OR DateI/ '/q/c9 Plot: a� Applicant/Owner: _ Sect.(l/4) 2 /we Township DS Range I L) MO/ U. Plot Location: 14.-r—A-la„�1 .D Topographic Location: Do normal environmental conditions exist?(S)N Explain: Are soils_ vegetation_ hydrology_significantly disturbed?? Explain: VEGETATION *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. *Dominant Plant Species % Cover Ind. Herb Stratum (% total cover: 100 ) (5 ft. radius) Shrub/Sapling Stratum (% total cover: ) (5' rad.) UP) �larr , arz n. ac.ea l00 FAGW 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. Tree Stratum (% total cover: ) (30 ft. radius) 7. 1. 8. 2. 9. 3. Remarks: bpiar,a Vac,- PS QtA - CRMO Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 1/1 = /00% Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? 01)}§) NO NWI Class eril SOILS Mapped unit name: Matches Profile? Y N Taxonomy: Drainage Class: Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Abund., Size, Color, on Pores/Peds? Texture, Struct., Other 10 u 1 oYR 3/l no Histosol Reducing Conditions (test) _Hi. Organic Cont. Surf Layer Histic Epipedon Gleyed Organic Streaking Sulfidic Odor Mottled (w/i 10") Organic Pan Prob. Aquic Moisture Regime Concretions (w/i 3", >2mm) On Hydric Soils List Remarks: Hydric Soil Criterion/Indicators Met?0 NO HYDROLOGY Depth of inundation: Depth to free water: Depth to saturation:cLAr&ce. seeps: 1 ° Indicators 2° Indicators 2° Indicators Inundated Oxidized Root Channels in upper 12" Local Soil Survey Data Saturated in upper 12" _Water-stained leaves FAC-Neutral Test Water Marks Recorded Data Available (aerials, gauge)? Explain: Drift Lines Other: Sediment Deposits Remarks: 5CaJ,`-Pse ecn In,3J Drainage Patterns Wetland Hydrology Criterion/ Indicators Met? to NO DETERMINATION: Is this plot a Wetland? 4.7iili+ NO Comments: Determined by: C f'm LJ ' CC-1- Fishman Environmental Services rev 9/97 APPENDIX B: VEGETATION OF THE FANNO CREEK TRAIL SITES Fishman Environmental Services Project 97126 VEGETATION OF THE FANNO CREEK TRAIL SITES AREA ONE - FOWLER SCHOOL SITE Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Status WETLAND quack grass Agropyron repens FAC- meadow foxtail Alopecurus pratensis FACW ornamental hawthorn Crataegus monogyna FACU+ smooth scouring-rush Equisetum laevigatum FACW Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia FACW reed canarygrass Phalaris arundinacea FACW Himalayan blackberry (trace) Rubus discolor FACU willow Sal ix species FAC or wetter Douglas' spirea Spiraea douglasii FACW vetch (trace) Vicia species - UPLAND meadow foxtail Alopecurus pratensis FACW ornamental hawthorn Crataegus monogyna FACU+ tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC- reed canarygrass Phalaris arundinacea FACW bluegrass Poa species - sword fern (trace) Polystichum munitum FACU rose Rosa species - Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU vetch (trace) Vicia species - VEGETATION OF THE FANNO CREEK TRAIL SITES AREA TWO - SW GRANT STREET SITE Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Status WETLAND quack grass Agropyron repens FAC- . bentgrass Agrostis species - tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC- Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia FACW reed canarygrass Phalaris arundinacea FACW creeping buttercup Ranunculus repens FACW small-fruited bulrush Scirpus microcarpus OBL climbing nightshade Solanum dulcamara FAC+ Douglas' spirea(trace) Spiraea douglasii FACW American speedwell Veronica americana OBL willow Salix species FAC or wetter UPLAND quack grass Agropyron repens FAC- bentgrass Agrostis species - red alder Alnus rubra FAC slough sedge Carex obnupta OBL ornamental hawthorn Crataegus monogyna FACU+ tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC- English ivy Hedera helix NOL reed canarygrass Phalaris arundinacea FACW sword fern Polystichum munitum FACU creeping buttercup Ranunculus repens FACW Himalayan blackberry Rub us discolor FACU dock Rumex species - climbing nightshade Solanum dulcamara FAC+ • VEGETATION OF THE FANNO CREEK TRAIL SITES AREA THREE - DOLAN PROPERTY/SW MAIN STREET SITE Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Status WETLAND Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia FACW soft rush Juncus effusus FACW reed canarygrass Phalaris arundinacea FACW pondweed Potamogeton species - Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU willow Sal ix species FAC or wetter Douglas' spirea Spiraea douglasii FACW UPLAND black hawthorn Crataegus douglasii FAC Oregon ash (trace) Fraxinus latifolia FACW reed canarygrass Phalaris arundinacea FACW Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU VEGETATION OF THE FANNO CREEK TRAIL SITES AREA FOUR - SW ASH AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY SITE Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Status WETLAND Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia FACW soft rush Juncus effusus FACW reed canarygrass Phalaris arundinacea FACW small-fruited bulrush Scirpus microcarpus OBL broad-leaf cattail Typha latifolia OBL UPLAND black hawthorn Crataegus douglasii FAC ornamental hawthorn Crataegus monogyna FACU+ Oregon ash (trace) Fraxinus latifolia FACW reed canarygrass Phalaris arundinacea FACW Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU