Loading...
Specifications . ., e.vgo?efio -061 1111111 , .. . , • /af/c?cs G/'4'" ,..., wittomo nivpsi - krotaiii 4esofn, nitiSil ' A;400.-ASA,K.4, Seismic Rx Approaches to zloisira Category D, E and F installations NIVSKVOM %.4FORTIMI. '',;1:4wieVaR Attached Wall rKilgt8A4 Attached Wall . , BERC2 Clips BERC2 Clips OR Pop Rivets S - - "ME garAVAzi ---,.. \ 1 i Nta.a. ' •-•• ---• ! r , 4 .•_, .- . - -- -- . , • ---,. , • ,. : 7,1.,:‹ *‘- '''' . , Ang. MIA , II .-,..V;Wi4PC11 Ilti 1 ., .,• ,,,, •,.:-:, •..,.. ;' •,•'• :•'• £,,,,,,,, .6 • , II '''2 Ill 44; AgirM,.41 . , 8'. I Ellinilill ;;,,,kar,:54Z.,' • 0■4 A-', -,"..;., , , '; Unattached Wall Unattached Wail X Hanger Wire j:Ca417.40 B BERG or BERC2 Clip U,MtfAIA P Pop Rivets •,:i;:r..X.V.:*-1z. SEISMIC; RX CODE COMPLIANT SOLUTIONS AND BENEFITS (ESR-1308 ,; PI Narrow, sleek aesthetic with standard 7/8" molding m Attached grid on two adjacent walls with the BERC2 -g.i''I'I'd Eliininates installation and aesthetic probleillS or pop rivets associated with 2 wall rpoldina ro BERC2 clip with 3/4" clearance on unattached walls a L.mver cost solution vq51.11!fem Better access to the plenum .. — • ,• • • 41011:1 . 'a Eliminates stabilizer bars ,.....,-,i0, :: ,,,, M Eliminates visible pop rivets through the wail angle 1 , a , ":.,:,.-„•& , ,,,. More profiles from which to choose !>,' ."...'", 1444:APRAZ! WA:C NBC Approach to Category D 5 E and F installations 5-1:kfowtzeo. Attached Wall Ati..... Riategl 6 ,i#7040 P P 1)7 , ' '''"n:I.'..: , "MT"' I B C REt..wil.-1,1VIEN , ,,,') ,',;,-.,::;:i*,,ZA 414141 .. . , 2 2" inolding / . .., ., x - ,...„.... „...--- g Attached grid on two adjacent walls \ with pop rivets, screws or other means sodiglgt-4 ,,,-.„, >', , -1 ,--:;,-. r 3/4 clearance at perimeter on unattached walls and stabilizer bars to prevent the Attached Wall W.W.WASPI ,4 spread of mains beams and cross tees 'ftiviamp:1: t m1- 40-0 N, ' :',''- ,...- E3 Heavy-duty grid ,..,t.,,,,,vi%.',., <..'..,, I ; ;n3,v,t4-q *.7,-,-mot S. X Hanger Wire T 54,40.10A1 Allail P Pop Rivets IR IL,Wifill 1 443 liabetel VW:tall 1 . 1 -'' • ' c -, ''''' ' X —X t• 2>,,,,,' `.., , K ligt - - - Unattached Wall Unattached Wall • :!E-.11011 ' ''/Y.ligla Rade :i49iSION 31 10,01 :', ''IWAIKE 'Iiittliell Lklin'itil 1Kiil: Seismic fix° Approaches to Category C installations . ' 1 atallE10 P*410, Easo square the system Tight Wall SEISIVOS Rx CODE COM:PLAINT AMITNIA BERC BERC2 I 8 B 8 1 SOLUTION L D 44:1444 S AND BENEIS OT — 7 4:i4.00 MiSR-1308) ''' ,M °. .:ikiii,4 kNOM .0 N, -"--- . — . 9,- ' Tight Wall light Wall B 111 L Meets code requirements ta y t 17 Eliminates stabilizer bars : a a ri Better acess to the plenum 1 :r,itat4; 1 3 Cross W Narrow, sleek aesthetic with standard i! 7/8 molding rat* r' da vea'a7t, BERG BERC2 E Grid can be tight on two adjoining . ... „ . walls — can use the BERC or BERC2 iilhata. • . „ 11 ' 111 NI7termediate-duty grid ..__ 4 t§ i t t , .11 Clearance Wan Clearance Wall ?.. .' .: , ■ X Hanger Wire B BERC or BERC2 Clip WilIIIIP 4 47: 4, P-144.MAL'c 4A 4 IBC Approach to Category C installations pift,..:411. . 1:41100 :, IF,10, Unattached Wall 1. ESEOUIREMENTS AN444:44-3- Ai 718 ' molding w 318 clearance on all sides: 3/8' overlap of the grid on toe wall molding t I rg Prevents the spread of mains/cross tees with stabilizer bars Ottr: ,„ ri inermecliate-dly grid tat'tt;4,;Z:, . 444-4 o.44.- 1 R i'b .'' 1 ;.' .. a \ x x it:71::i:11 '4: 14 f-,, -, :lis wilifil „ X X .0 Aft Unattached Wall (all four sides) kilki0, 04: • ', -:t , '''''' '''4,0.0: X Hanger Wire , '.7 Airet 4 .: Unattached Wall WI:PA _wow A .n , .: : v) :, details To download GAO drawing go to a-mstro-sg.e.oralsa'snlic. 4 rZ,44::,:l115 Fe complete seismic inslalialion i:erluireMerliS 0:quact TesnLine' ar - I K7 ARMSTRONG. t'Arkri,`fl Preventing Border a is ;' 6 , t from Ill Installation Tip Nttiw :7,, THE CASE FOR 'ERE ' =fr.` EP a • ,n , • In full -scale seismic test evaluations for areas su bject to severe seismic motion. the common cause of system failure; came from damage to cross tee end connectors ;Armstrong and competitive systems). _ ` Damage occurred in one of two ways: ° i a Connector clip bends ,`<yw '= wr Base metal bends '- } ` l�'l�en this damatle occurs it allows i�nbraced sections of ceiling to move up to 3,'8 at each '� �,'., , 'L; w ,,; , , f connection. F ?�e cunli iative of ect of damage at the cross tee t or3ner inns may move the ceiling �, w A more than . , F 4 Without perimeter support wires, test results demonstrate that the load of the ceiling may cause -''•y , the main beams and cross tees to move beyond the 2' wall molding and drop out. System failure 14 ti; at the perimeter does not conform to the requirements of the code. 40: G% ; , g 1 '3;1 S ° ;;,� ' r^ ..:s f :fin, �d : ; %�,r , ; n , <..� �� � '',1 � ' , '�,, ;� : :4 `Fey , : ^ - 'a :,` .,sa w at * sa °. UI Da nape at cress tee connections Ur supported cross tees allow panels ; allows ceiling movement. ' - : Braced£ • `�' inn =i „ D E it;A,,vol, s' >:3 4' o.c. Potential Movement ``z t ,' 9 11 A ft C D E - Is 3/4" + 3/8" + 3/8" + 3/8" + 3/8" = 2-1/4 " -' ..:ria ` y\0 ti ;�;nv ;- Seismic Separation Joints ,1 -. PURPOSE:: OF SEPARATION JOINTS •i 1 ASCE 7 Section 13 5.6 2.2 mandates that ceiling areas greater than 2,500 SF must have seismic 0 4;••Z 'if separation joints, closure angles and norizontal restraints. This means 2' molding, perimeter spacer ;:;P�; °''° ,,. bars - and if the area is greater than 1,000 SF lateral force bracing. It is thought Mat these measures ;;;•.t\ will prevent the accumulated forces from overpowering an individual suspension system connection. ., 3 i. This method of failure was observed after some strong California quakes in the 1980s. <„ The code does not describe now to construct the separation joint, Initially, we responded to inquiries ;_ `: by providing an expansion joint detail fabricated from steel moldings, This type of joint is widely ,i;: r accepted because it is familiar to inspectors and because the width of the separation can be se: to march whatever the project designer requires. However. many designers find this method objectionable: 4 K;•. ii " Traditional field- fabricated expansion joint details are very noticeable on the ceiling plane 1 The system is not very rigid and the grid system can move 'off module" y jy"' ,. j' £'rte. n ov.9 VF_R k S ..,+�,t C �. SOLUTION fir:4:,,, ,7 "a' H� LJ S.. � �..J ^�k ''. t.i tT 0.i :... ly � � L9 N t,'0413 Armstrong has done full -scale testing which coniir :ris that a ceiling fitted with our Seismic Joint Clip for Main Beams ;SJMR) and Seismic Joint Clip for Cross Tees (SJCG S SCJSI) performs as well as ` " fix° a field fabricated separation joint. Additional benefits to triese seismic - rested separation joints are: a ,_�, <..� t SCI I' C';..Ia- �.,5r( j; A (SJMR) ,:;,j - >" m Gives architects and designers a clean look (not visible from the floor) ' Saves contractors time with a reliable installation method : :` -_e Easily installs in minutes at main beam splice is \ Ap _° Maintains integrity of ceiling module, unlike field assembled alternatives t' Allows for full acoustical panel at the joint :e . " 2 Easier to keep the ceiling system square " v VA tl kT 't v ,i011 y ' y . , !II SEISMIC JOINT CUP — CROSS TEE i,SJCG & S, CSI) z Gives architects and designers a clean look (not visible from the floor) • s Saves contractors time with a reliable installation method " "' Li Installs in minutes, no need to cut the face of the grid to install clip r -= ,,. - 4,tz° to Eliminates the need for additional hanger wires Maintains integrity of the ceiling module, unlike field assembled alternatives ``. i at Allows the use of full size panels %. „r'A n Works with our PeakFore grid (Suprafine , Prelude) and square bulb grid ,°, ' 'tt;119 (Silhouett and Interlude') t x ;iikti C ae 40007..... v Separation Joint Layout Details „,, -, ,,,,,,,, S' F' I 4” I „, SJC 4- -Main 2 — Main Beam — Man 2' -Main Beam- -Main 2' -Main Main- •u `� - '°-j3„ - Beam � 'Beam � � Beam - Beam Beam • = ``air SJC a' <`:;; -SJMR -SJMR ST ?:,s,s 1- -SJMR - -SJMR SJMR - -1 -'SJMR — SJMR-- - 4" Cross I ' SJC - ' SJC Tee SJMR 2' — SJMR SJMR" �.-.1 -4" Cross Tee -4' Cross Tee 1 SJC -4' Cross Tee '" " SJC -- 2 Cross -- 2'Cross � ,���,a =,, '`y Tee Tee SJC - , I j T SA'. its ? z 4 ; .. 53..1Mil am SE i° 2' x -_ ; - 'Votst r= Bracing and Restraint for Seismic Installations W yi° IF wit NCE . E ' I ,f" R ;as-y iiu AND P '-, *E(trfl '. ; Y -� � Le Attachment to the wall is considered restaint. Bracing is a form of restraint (compression post '°'t°°=: - : r; . and wires). t.• ,tc � ,. »E: Typical seismic bracing for a wail -to -wall ceiling consists of clusters of tour 12 -gage wires arrayed 14 9 ° f� one attached main p., cross tee ct' These ii53 - -� > . d from o,je �,r�othe! and aftache.l to the m�.i,i beam Within 2' of a c,,,s., ec intersection. Then m 4 wires are to be angled no more than 45° from the plane of the ceiling. The compression post is , attached to the grid at the cluster o` wires and extends to the overhead structure (see Figure 1). r The compression post needs to be engineered for the application and the longer its length the more substantial it must be. Typical post materials are EMT conduit or steel stud (see Figure 2). ,.'. 1 ,,tcl t it-1, • c' r ` , z _ d ° ' '': The code also allows to the use of rigid bracing. The advantage here is that when a rigid member is used in place of wires if can handle loads in two directions ;push and /or pull) so only two diagonals kc,' � \P , and one vertical are needed at each location, v.4•Ji5,!y •,�,\`„ STEEL STUD L>\ ;y — ' f COMPRESSION POST '` �±',?\ .,, COMPRESSION POST 12 GA HANGER WIRE ,. � ,�, 3 .: #12 HANGER W • ' ':'4 ,: TYP TWW (3 TIGHT WR APS ) 45° OR LESS IRE 45° OR LESS €s.,•`� , ; :',? '' MAIN BEAM \ < \ `•' ' 4 ?' \ ?\\`•`•w .:..4 4' -0' O.C. f : asy ,. , �� `fi e„ 45° ~/\ �. OR LESS 72 GA BRACE WIRES ARMSTRONG �� 5° OR LESS CROSS TEE- ARMSTRONG ' ` - MAIN BEA ' CROSS TEES ■ t r . Flgl€ "e 1 \ Figure �: '';‘- z -o•oc. X f ;; _` , is Typical wall-to-mill ceiling restraint is achieved by proximity or attachment to the perimeter angles I 3, ' 5 ° which are fixed to the walls. Seismic Design Category C allows some movement but limits are Ci; established by setting the required clearance at 3/8". Seismic Design Categories D, E and F require =° :_ the ceiling grid to be fixed to the wall molding on two adjacent walls. This attachment to the molding : —. is the first element of restraint. As the ceiling area gets larger and the mass (or weight) of the ceiling t` A increases additional restraint must be applied in the form of , :lateral force bracing.:` Clouds and Canopies f INSTALLING CLOUDS >( "\� Armstrong defines a cloud as a ceiling that is not connected to a wall on any side. f": ; =Y' ° ASCE -7 Design Manual, Section .t 3 states that the design of architectural components and their f, i.i ,: ,r,' supports is required to meet minimum values as calculated in Section 13,3.1 for seismic force and . , ,tT . ;T Section 13.3.2 for lateral displacement. Ceilings are a line item on the chart associated with these Ls P calculations. Unless specifically exempted oy the local authority, it should be assumed that a cloud , T (architectural component) comprised (If grid and panels must be restrained. Part of the formula used 4; 2 <,, in these calculations takes seismic design category into consideration, so the minimum force values 10 '' will go down or up as toe seismic risk changes. N VA k, , diii Id a, 5<,.