Loading...
CUP1996-00009 • • 110 Akk rI CITY OF TIGARD Community ,.wlopmrnt hoping 4 „Senor Communitg • CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER a BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0009 Case Name(s): AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Name of Owner: Estate of Rosemarie Emery c/o David Kim Name of Applicant: AirTouch Cellular Address of Applicant: 15575 SW Sequoia Parkway City: Portland State: Oregon Zip: 97224 Address of Property: 12925 SW Pacific Highway City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Tax Map & Lot No(s).: WCTM 2S1 0213D. Tax Lot 02600 Request: > The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop an 80- foot -tall cellular monopole structure with associated equipment structures. Zone: General Commercial (C -G). -The purpose of the C -G zoning district is to provide sites for a wide range of goods and services. Utilities are also permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, - 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. Action: > © Approval as requested ❑ Approval with conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of record within the required distance © Affected governmental agencies © The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The applicant and owner(s) Final Decision:' THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON JANUARY 15, 1997 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $1,745.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON JANUARY 15, 1997. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Dept. at (503) 639 -4171. CUP 96.0009 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER {COVER SHEET} • • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application for a conditional use permit ) FINAL ORDER for an 80 -foot tall tower for cellular telephone antennas ) and an accessory structure in the C -G zone at 12925 ) CUP 96 -0009 SW Pacific Highway in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (Airtouch Cellular) I. SUMMARY The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit for an 80 -foot tall tower that will support antennas for cellular telephone services and for a related equipment building and associated development. The proposed use will occupy the northwest roughly 1600 square feet of a commercially developed 0.87 -acre parcel. The proposed use has vehicular access to SW Pacific Highway through the existing parking lot on the site. The applicant will enclose the cellular tower site with a 7 -foot tall slatted chain link fence. The applicant will preserve existing trees abutting the site and will plant vegetation (15 conifer trees providing about 375 square feet of new landscaping) along the northwest and southeast sides of the tower site. A 12- x 20 -foot accessory building will adjoin the tower. A duly noticed public hearing was held to review the application. City staff recommended approval. The applicant accepted the staff recommendation without objections. No one else appeared at the hearing orally or in writing. The hearings officer approves the conditional use permit as provided herein. II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE, SURROUNDINGS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES The hearings officer incorporates by reference the findings about the site and surroundings in Section III of the City of Tigard Staff Reported dated November 27, 1996 (the "Staff Report "), and the agency comments in Section V of the Staff Report. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS The hearings officer incorporates by reference the approval standards in Section IV of the Staff Report. IV. HEARINGS AND RECORD 1. Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer ") received testimony at the public hearing about this application on December 9, 1996. The record closed at the conclusion of the hearing. The testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. 2. At the hearing, city planner Mark Roberts summarized the Staff Report. The applicant's representative, Chris Eaton, accepted the Staff Report without objections or corrections. The applicant's radio engineer, Joe Ahsing, explained why the tower includes two levels for antennas. No one else appeared orally or in writing or by representative. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST City staff recommended approval of the conditional use permit based on the findings in section IV of the Staff Report. No one disputed those findings. The hearings officer concludes the findings in section IV of the Staff Report accurately reflect the law and the facts. The hearings officer adopts and incorporates those findings as his own. Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 96-W09 (AirTouch Cellular) Page 1 • • VI. CONCLUSION AND DECISION 1. Based on the findings adopted and incorporated herein, the hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit complies with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws. 2. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of affected public agencies and testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings officer hereby approves CUP 96 -0009. DATED this 17th day of December, 1996. �l /iA. 4L _ If!/ Larry Epste' • • City of Tig. e ngs Officer Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 96 -0009 (AirTouch Cellular) Page 2 • Agenda Item: 2, Hearing Date: December 9. 1996 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY OF TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOL Conditional Use Permit CUP 96 -0009 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval to develop an 80- foot -tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures: APPLICANT: AirTouch Cellular OWNER: Estate of Rosemarie Emery 15575 SW Sequoia Parkway 1360 SW Woodward Way Portland, OR 97224 Portland, OR 97225 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C -G). ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C -G). LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 02BD, Tax Lot 02600. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, and 18.164. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Hearing's Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely: affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, staff. recommends APPROVAL. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 1 • • SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The property is developed with a retail commercial building that is occupied by a mixture of retail and office uses. In 1981 Site Development Review, Minor Land Partition, Variance, and Zone Change approvals were issued for a 4,800 square foot expansion to the existing commercial center. This approved addition was not developed. The City has no record of anymore recent development applications having been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: To the north the site is adjoined by an apartment project. The proposed lease area is adjoined by the site's primary existing retail commercial use to the south. The property is adjoined by other commercial uses to the west and to the east. Site Information and Proposal Description: The western portion of the site is presently developed with a retail commercial center. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit Approval to develop an 80 -foot cellular communication tower facility and related equipment structures. The Public Hearing Notice for this request inadvertently listed the height of the proposed monopole at 60 feet. Although the application itself states that a 60 -foot height is being requested, all of the detailed application materials state that an 80 -foot height is requested. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a 80 foot cellular monopole. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a utility. Code Section 18.62 lists utilities as a conditionally permitted use in the General Commercial Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.62 states that there is no minimum lot size requirements. Developments within the General Commercial Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant has provided a landscape plan for the leasehold area that is proposed to be developed. The plan appears to provide in excess of the 15% minimum landscaping requirement. The applicant shall provide calculations concerning the percentage of landscaping to impervious surface ratio within the leasehold area. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 2 • • Setback: Section 18.56.050 states that there is no front yard or side yard setback facing the street. No side and rear yard setbacks are required except; a minimum of 20 feet shall be required where a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district. The site adjoins a residential zoning district and complies with the 20 -foot setback standard of the General Commercial Zoning District as proposed. Building Height Limitations - Exceptions: Section 18.98.020 states that any building located in a non - residential zoning district shall not exceed a height of 75 feet subject to certain criteria. Section 18.98.010 exempts structures that are not intended for human habitation from this limitation. The proposed cellular monopole is not intended for human habitation and is exempt from the height requirement as provided under Section 18.98.010. Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart. The maximum planting distance is dependent on the trees size at maturity. A minimum of a two inch caliper tree at four feet in height is required at planting. The existing commercial center does not have street trees. For this reason, the shopping center is not currently in compliance with this standard. It is recommended that this section be found to be not applicable to this proposal. The proposed leasehold area does not have direct frontage on a Public Street. The existing site improvements are not made more non - conforming through the development of a new communications use. This interpretation is consistent with the Non - Conforming Structure provisions of Section 18.132.040 (C). Screening Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has not proposed to develop a parking lot in conjunction with this use, therefore, the listed parking lot screening provisions are not applicable. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 -foot distance along the street right -of -way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 -foot distance points with a straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height The height is measured from the top of the curb. Where no curb exists the height is measured from the street grade at the center line. Trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has not proposed to construct improvements that exceed the aforementioned height within the Clear Vision areas. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 3 Section 18.106.030 does not • Minimum Off - Street Parking: specify a min' p fy minimum parking ratio requirement for an unmanned utility use such as the proposed cellular communications monopole. The applicant has not provided a parking lot to serve this development. Because there is no minimum parking ratio for this type of facility, no off - street parking has been provided. Access: Section 18.108.080 states that commercial and industrial uses that require less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30 -feet, and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. This use does not require that parking spaces be provided therefore, two -way access is also not needed to serve this facility. For this reason, no specific access width is required for this use. Through the Building Permit Fire and Life Safety Review, any necessary revisions will be made to this plan for emergency vehicle access. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections • 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, 18.134 18.150 and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Sections are reviewed within this staff report. • Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (Sensitive Lands), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.120.180.11 (Access and Circulation) 18.120.180 (Public Transit), 18.120.180.12, (Parking) 18.120.180.13, (Drainage) 18.120.180.15, (Provision for the Handicapped) 18.120.180.16, (Signs) 18.120.180.17 and are therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. This proposal does contain elements related to Sections 18.120.180.2 (Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment), 18.120.180.4 (Buffering and Screening), 18.120.180.10 (Crime Prevention and Safety), 18.120.180.14 (Landscaping); and are reviewed elsewhere within this report. The underlying provisions of the General Commercial Zoning District are also reviewed elsewhere within this staff report. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 provides the following criteria for review of new developments compatibility with the environment: a. Buildings shall be: (i) Located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage; (ii) Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; (iii) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire fighting; and (iv) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind; and STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 4 b. Trees having a six inch caliper or greater shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character Section "a" is not applicable as no buildings are proposed to be developed. The application addresses the requirements of Section "b ". The applicant does not propose to remove trees through the development of the lease hold area. Existing trees will be used to partially screen the proposed monopole from view. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses: Section 18.120.180.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The applicant has provided a mixture of screening and buffering materials to screen the ground mounted equipment. Due to its 80 -foot height and for communication purposes, it is not possible to screen the entire facility and still allow the necessary clear line of site to the antennae structure. Any plantings at a height of 80 -feet would necessitate greater height for the proposed antennae. The monopole itself has been designed to be as unobtrusive as possible given the antennas height requirements. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on -site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to screen ground mounted equipment through the use of a seven - foot -tall slatted chain link fencing and new landscape plantings along the north and south sides of the proposed leasehold area. Other existing trees around the perimeter of the site will partially screen this facility. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department reviewed this application and had no comments or concerns with this development as proposed. Landscaping: Section 18.120.180.14 provides the following standards for the provision of landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.100. b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped; The applicants compliance with the requirements set forth in Section "a" is reviewed elsewhere within this report. Section "b" is found to be inapplicable to the proposal because these sections refer to privacy, noise, glare and outdoor common areas that are all unaffected by this proposal. A minimum of 15% of the overall existing site area is presently landscaped. A minimum of 15% of the proposed leasehold area is to be landscaped. The proposed new landscaping is for areas that are not currently landscaped. STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 5 Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval a roval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the . proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. . The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The use, as proposed, complies with all site development standards set forth for the General Commercial Zoning District. The property is physically separated from existing residential development due to its location. Fencing, landscaping, and existing trees will partially screen the proposed monopole and fully screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The applicant has not requested that public facilities be made available to serve this development as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met by this proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. The use is defined as a Minor Impact Utility due to the type of proposed facility. The location criteria for a Minor Impact Utility is that the site have access to a minimum of a Minor Collector Street. The site is proposed to be provided with an access easement to a commercial driveway that provides direct access to SW Pacific Highway, a designated Arterial Street. Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will not generate substantial traffic, light, or other impacts as the facility would be an unstaffed communications antennae. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements that are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. The applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact of the antenna. The antenna is described in the applicant's submittal as being a galvanized metal pole with antennas which are not expected to draw attention to the structure. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 6 No other unique, natural fe atures have been noted on this site. The small leased area requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use, leaving remaining underdeveloped portions of the property for future redevelopment. The specific development criteria of the Comprehensive Plan that addresses the development of this type of utility facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code. The applicable development standards are addressed within this report. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the applicant has also not proposed to extend other utility services to the site, no conditions have been recommended concerning the provision of public utilities. The Building Department has reviewed this request and provided the following comment: A Building Permit is required for all fences, towers, and walls in excess of six feet in height. No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS No other comments or objections have been received. 7I' November 27. 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner C / tLi - -t November 26. 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorle DATE Planning Manager STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 7 1 1111 1 • or ` "°' a. _ I TAX for �j y-:� MO ` \ I 1 � / �i , 4 % 4'^_ i I CAN RM YARD 927000t . Id MCI Lu \ ,. 4, 'a � � `y" �«Y7s +sr ti ' .w7rnw lvsooct I [ - ktr,, / QQ��, eitk err o'.' c'_ c'> Z . . A /, II/ TAX to► % ■ d , ► W 4, g. �' ® � • ���; Z 1000 2 V!!////! TAX for & ` ) I y 7700 Y1 f. , i tt 1 £ ' v I • r y , ,� .... OAar a l � P . *' L 1 I ' 1 I \ 1 TAX nor r�7 for A ��� �` / .. ,� I • S OQ I 7000 `\ Z i I III 1 1 1 1 1 1 , I I ,a ,, ? M �'°"°` 1 / I L�'. -I i . 1 A tonne:i I n , I T 44D1r , E1D1T Ss777701 ttLM cm - - - STATE HIGHWAY 99W - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- L 4 ( PACIFIC HIGHWAY) I 4 CURS LL 0 >` l U PLOT PLAN a CASE NO. EXHIBIT M A P s Air Touch Cellular Monopole CUP 96 -0009 } iv 1-_-. l' • / / V /.. Vi i ' "jar 0 ■ 2 • % . / • V: V OLW • -a' ..,„+#4 •• / vo •i'i 4 -t c S 41 -* •■■ o Aa„‘ O ■ • - % SU u 0) -N1* P I17 kip --11 04W N . I., .,„ • c IWIW ( C IL GJ IT:# \***. s- E 'male N_,. ...1. ,-#1,..-0 .„,...., • 0 ,- ima /.._ 1 1 JC cn 1 i P afT ‘ W i= iL- O "10,-4 T 4. 1 4, 1. * * vo g ° --ii .. ---1 vc� ,� Q ° c� -00 10;•.,...•$. /4* .., A'vTouch 96 Ce Monopole 'S ElkIBIT A • CITY OF TIGARD Community . .v Iopm.Ot • • Shaping 04 antic Community CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER a BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0009 Case Name(s): AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Name of Owner: Estate of Rosemarie Emery c/o David Kim Name of Applicant: AirTouch Cellular Address of Applicant: 15575 SW Sequoia Parkway City: Portland State: Oregon Zip: 97224 Address of Property: 12925 SW Pacific Highway City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Tax Map & Lot No(s).: WCTM 2S1 02BD. Tax Lot 02600 Request: > The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop an 80- foot -tall cellular monopole structure with associated equipment structures. Zone: General Commercial (C -G). The purpose of the C -G zoning district is to provide sites for a wide range of goods and services. Utilities are also permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. Action: > © Approval as requested ❑ Approval with conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of record within the required distance © Affected governmental agencies © The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The applicant and owner(s) Final Decision:9> THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON JANUARY 15, 1997 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $1,745.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON JANUARY 15, 1997. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Dept. at (503) 639 -4171. CUP 96 -0009 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER {COVER SHEET) • • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application for a conditional use permit ) FINAL ORDER for an SO -foot tall tower for cellular telephone antennas and an accessory structure in the C -G zone at 12925 ) CUP 96 -(X)09 SW Pacific Highway in the City of Tigard. Oregon ) ( Airtouch Cellular) I. SUMMARY The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit for an 80 -foot tall tower that will support antennas for cellular telephone services and for a related equipment building and associated development. The proposed use will occupy the northwest roughly 1600 square feet of a commercially developed 0.87 -acre parcel. The proposed use has vehicular access to SW Pacific Highway through the existing parking lot on the site. The applicant will enclose the cellular tower site with a 7 -foot tall slatted chain link fence. The applicant will preserve existing trees abutting the site and will plant vegetation (15 conifer trees providing about 375 square feet of new landscaping) along the northwest and southeast sides of the tower site. A 12- x 20 -foot accessory building will adjoin the tower. A duly noticed public hearing was held to review the application. City staff recommended approval. The applicant accepted the staff recommendation without objections. No one else appeared at the hearing orally or in writing. The hearings officer approves the conditional use permit as provided herein. II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE, SURROUNDINGS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES The hearin officer incorporates by reference the findings about the site and surroundings in Section III of the City of Tigard Staff Reported dated November 27, 1996 (the "Staff Report "), and the agency comments in Section V of the Staff Report. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS The hearings officer incorporates by reference the approval standards in Section IV of the Staff Report. IV. HEARINGS AND RECORD 1. Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer ") received testimony at the public hearing about this application on December 9, 1996. The record closed at the conclusion of the hearing. The testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. 2. At the hearing, city planner Mark Roberts summarized the Staff Report. The applicant's representative, Chris Eaton, accepted the Staff Report without objections or corrections. The applicant's radio engineer. Joe Ahsing, explained why the tower includes two levels for antennas. No one else appeared orally or in writing or by representative. V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST City staff recommended approval of the conditional use permit based on the findings in section IV of the Staff Report No one disputed those findings. The hearings officer concludes the findings in section IV of the Staff Report accurately reflect the law and the facts. The hearings officer adopts and incorporates those findings as his own. Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 96 -0009 (Air -ouch Cellular) Page 1 • • VI. CONCLUSION AND DECISION • 1. Based on the findings adopted and incorporated herein, the hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit complies with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws. 2. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of affected public agencies and testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings officer hereby approves CUP 96 -0009. DATED this 17th day of D cember, 1996. ■I/4 A , /Ii!1, Larry Epste' . • • • - City of Tig P e ngs Officer • Hearings Officer Final Order C :'P 96 -0009 /AirTouch Cellular) Page 2 • Agenda Item: 2° Hearing Date: December 9. 1996 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY OF TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Conditional Use Permit CUP 96 -0009 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval to develop an 80-foot-tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. APPLICANT: AirTouch Cellular - OWNER: Estate of Rosemarie Emery 15575 SW Sequoia Parkway 1360 SW Woodward Way Portland, OR 97224 Portland, OR 97225 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C -G). ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C -G). LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 02BD, Tax Lot 02600. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, and 18.164. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Hearing's Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, staff • recommends APPROVAL. STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 1 • SECTION III: BACK RQUNp INFORMATION Site History: • The property is developed with a retail commercial building that is occupied by a mixture of retail and office uses. In 1981 Site Development Review, Minor Land Partition, Variance, and Zone Change approvals were issued for a 4,800 square foot expansion to the existing commercial center. This approved addition was not developed. The City has no record of any more recent development applications having been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: To the north the site is adjoined by an apartment project. The proposed lease area is adjoined by the site's primary existing retail commercial use to the south. The property is adjoined by other commercial uses to the west and to the east. Site Information and Proposal Description; The western portion of the site is presently developed with a retail commercial center. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit Approval to develop an 80 -foot cellular communication tower facility and related equipment structures. The Public Hearing Notice for this request inadvertently listed the height of the proposed monopole at 60 feet. Although the application itself states that a 60 -foot height is being requested, all of the detailed application materials state that an 80 -foot height is requested. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a 80 foot cellular monopole. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a utility. Code Section 18.62 lists utilities as a conditionally permitted use in the General Commercial Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.62 states that there is no minimum lot size requirements. Developments within the General Commercial Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant has provided a landscape plan for the leasehold area that is proposed to be developed. The plan appears to provide in excess of the 15% minimum landscaping requirement. The applicant shall provide calculations concerning the percentage of landscaping to impervious surface ratio within the leasehold area. STAFF REPORT CUP 960009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Pa9e 2 Setback: Section 18.56.0 states that there is no front yard • or side yard setback , , facing the street No side and rear yard setbacks are required except; a minimum of 20 feet shall be required where a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district The site adjoins a residential zoning district and complies with the 20 -foot setback standard of the General Commercial Zoning District as proposed. Building Height Limitations - Exceptions: Section 18.98.020 states that any building located in a non - residential zoning district shall not exceed a height of 75 feet subject to certain criteria. - Section 18.98.010 exempts structures that are not intended for human habitation from this limitation. The proposed cellular monopole is not intended for human habitation and is exempt from the height requirement as provided under Section 18.98.010. Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart. The maximum planting distance is dependent on the trees size at maturity. A minimum of a two inch caliper tree at four feet in height is required at planting. The existing commercial center does not have street trees. For this reason, the shopping center is not currently in compliance with this standard. It is recommended that this section be found to be not applicable to this proposal. The proposed leasehold area does not have direct frontage on a Public Street. The existing site improvements are not made more non - conforming through the development of a new communications use. This interpretation is consistent with the Non - Conforming Structure provisions of Section 18.132.040 (C). Screening Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas . shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has not proposed to develop a parking lot in conjunction with this use, therefore, the listed parking lot screening provisions are not applicable. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 -foot distance along the street right -of -way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 -foot distance points with a straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height The height is measured from the top of the curb. Where no curb exists the height is measured from the street grade at the center line. Trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has not proposed to construct improvements that exceed the aforementioned height within the Clear Vision areas. STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 3 Minimum Off -Street Parking: Section 18.106.030 does not specify a minimum parking P 9 ratio requirement for an unmanned utility use such as the proposed cellular ' communications monopole. The applicant has not provided a parking lot to serve this development. Because there is no minimum parking ratio for this type of facility, no off- • • street parking has been provided. - Access: Section 18.108.080 states that commercial and industrial uses that require less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30 -feet, and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. This use does not require that parking spaces be provided therefore, two -way access is also not needed to serve this facility. For this reason, no specific access width is required for this use. Through the Building Permit Fire and Life Safety Review, any necessary revisions will be made to this plan for emergency vehicle access. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, 18.134 18.150 and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Sections are reviewed within this staff report. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), _ 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (Sensitive Lands), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.120.180.11 (Access and Circulation) 18.120.180 (Public Transit), 18.120.180.12, (Parking) 18.120.180.13, (Drainage) 18.120.180.15, (Provision for the Handicapped) 18.120.180.16, (Signs) 18.120.180.17 and are therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. This proposal does contain elements related to Sections 18.120.180.2 (Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment), 18.120.180.4 (Buffering and Screening), 18.120.180.10 (Crime Prevention and Safety), 18.120.180.14 (Landscaping); and are reviewed elsewhere within this report. The underlying provisions of the General Commercial Zoning District are also reviewed elsewhere within this staff report. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 provides the following criteria for review of new developments compatibility with the environment: a. Buildings shall be: (i) Located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage; (ii) Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; (iii) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire fighting; and (iv) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind; and STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 4 . b. Trees having a six inicaliper or greater shall be reseed or replaced b P P by new plantings of equal character Section "a" is not applicable as no buildings are proposed to be developed. The application addresses the requirements of Section "b ". The applicant does not propose to remove trees through the development of the lease hold area. Existing trees will be used to partially screen the proposed monopole from view. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses: Section 18.120.180.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The applicant has provided a mixture of screening and buffering materials to screen the ground mounted equipment. Due to its 80 -foot height and for communication purposes, it is not possible to screen the entire facility and still allow the necessary clear line of site to the antennae structure. Any plantings at a height of 80 -feet would necessitate greater height for the proposed antennae. The monopole itself has been designed to be as unobtrusive as possible given the antennas height requirements. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on -site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to screen ground mounted equipment through the use of a seven - foot -tall slatted chain link fencing and new landscape plantings along the north and south sides of the proposed leasehold area. Other existing trees around the perimeter of the site will partially screen this facility. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department reviewed this application and had no comments or concerns with this development as proposed. Landscaping: Section 18.120.180.14 provides the following standards for the provision of landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.100. b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped; The applicants compliance with the requirements set forth in Section "a" is reviewed elsewhere within this report. Section "b" is found to be inapplicable to the proposal because these sections refer to privacy, noise, glare a:'d outdoor common areas that are all unaffected by this proposal. A minimum of 15% cf the overall existing site area is presently landscaped. A minimum of 15% of the proposed leasehold area is to be landscaped. The proposed new landscaping is for areas that are not currently landscaped. STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 5 Conditional Use: SectionS.130.040 contains the following g approval criteria for a Conditional Use: • 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The use, as proposed, complies with all site development standards set forth for the General Commercial Zoning District. The property is physically separated from existing residential development due to its location. Fencing, landscaping, and existing trees will partially screen the proposed monopole and fully screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The applicant has not requested that public facilities be made available to serve this development as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met by this proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. . The use is defined as a Minor Impact Utility due to the type of proposed facility. The location criteria for a Minor Impact Utility is that the site have access to a minimum of a Minor Collector Street. The site is proposed to be provided with an access easement to a commercial driveway that provides direct access to SW Pacific Highway, a designated Arterial Street. Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will not generate substantial traffic, light, or other impacts as the facility would be an unstaffed communications antennae. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements that are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. The applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact of the antenna. The antenna is described in the applicant's submittal as being a galvanized metal pole with antennas which are not expected to draw attention to the structure. STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 6 No other unique, natural feeures have been noted on this site. The small leased area , requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use, leaving remaining underdeveloped portions of the property for future redevelopment. The specific development criteria of the Comprehensive Plan that addresses the development of this type of utility facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code. The applicable development standards are addressed within this report. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the applicant has also not proposed to extend other utility services to the site, no conditions have been recommended concerning the provision of public utilities. The Building Department has reviewed this request and provided the following comment A Building Permit is required for all fences, towers, and walls in excess of six feet in height. • No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS No other comments or objections have been received. November 27. 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner ' > �Li !c• - - a November 26. 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorr DATE Planning Manager STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 7 \ \,\\�\ \ \ \ \\ I �k ___ _ � • 1 `� I rlig tr 174 Ill I �� 1 I--- I- -.» --1 :ti , g� a� if :' ' • 44 1 'y Ij I i ,� — M w_ �.cannr X IX i .1 1�� 1 _ 1111 II II,! � . ;I, H 1 -;•-:,>, 1 r 1 °I it II ! rl� • P ‘. == - li d _ , I - 03 3 fr -,- , %, — It ,44 41 jill, / • .....41 >,„ ...( • 1.,,c, , ,.. ...„ r ,_ .. : __J : . 1 0" ?.. Z i ...4)1 / 1 6. 4 &. . i .. •4 ..$ , • I .. I 1 ,y" . r . 4 .-, .V.r• • .. , 6 i -0 J ' .ftw r " tst ..i." "" 1 I+ r I 1 , � � :ii E ( 1 0 iii • C 1� `J 1 ti p 1 ; ;� w 0 (n ° I b U . rr� I I �s • ■ c n z , I 1 O I I 1 • �' Er J 1 1 3 I ,� _ 0 0 W 133815 1i'NldM . S CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. k a --- 7.7 t ---4 : ----- 7 2- -', f \.)- / / .. // \\/" / _____. — .:cusi l .' -- /./ ‘‘.: '-__, ''' -� , , t ..,_ -••* \____,..-,-/ / 1/4 /". 4 - _.1 /// c , I,7, / / C . \—,•", '',//' ' 4 , , .."//' N/ 'N / / // /-/ 02 .\y . / / /C7 / , .:;4 . # ,,--------' P , , ,y. I , , % 4 f9 s4 4t. r, co4 8 : /'‘ • ) „, s SUs �# - I ‘,44 PAR S V>4# c ' , •• , 4 '" I t■ C e G Cr \ SV ' \ <t .1 4*#. A ii4. . 1 0 O. r ♦ 47\: -1 0 L__ I nik pARK - 7 .- 4 a ' $ 01 IC , a . . •* v 4 ! : 1 " ----, 1 � :i J -4* , 7 . ./ /17 ! i ik , . .,---. 0 4;,,,,i O. \.:.:-..-- _ i ., , ! 4„,_ / LL-1-; . s■• / 7\kvgL) ____. --// /KN i 1 ; . - ,-\\ !,\ 'r \ O \■ r'14i ('''/- '< \ vA ■/ vicinity Map A CUP 96 -0009 voce: Map is au U scale AirTouch Cellular Monopole N NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY 1111HEARING'S OFFICE EXHIBIT CUP 96 -0009 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE AIRTOUCH CELLULAR 15575 SW SEQUOIA PARKWAY PORTLAND OR 97224 DAVID KIM ESTATE OF ROSEMARIE EMERY 1360 SW WOODWARD WAY PORTLAND OR 97225 W & H PACIFIC INC. CHRIS EATON 8405 SW NIMBUS AVENUE BEAVERTON OR 97008 -7120 • • A i .,.-ipv:pi. • City of 1l9ard, Oregon • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: ( O .Cr boa ..aw.....ro.. -) (o+eat appropn.te box bebw} (Enter Pub.e Hearn; Date above) O City of Tigard Planning Director O Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer O Tigard City Council ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) DECISION FOR: 02....r+.•..•......) City of Tigard Planning Director 1 That I served NOTICE OF AMENDED 0) FINAL ORDER ) AL RDER FOR: • c t..., ea..n.....ppeo.erl a+etlt avproprooe box Wow} ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑/ Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer O Tigard City Council ❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of whic ' attached, marked Exhibit "A ", wa -' - ./ each r .: med p -. on(s) at the addres (s) shown on the attach d li t(s), marked Exhibit "B" • • e .0— • ay of ;,� 'Ow,/ // 199( , and deposited in the Uni ed States Mail o e „- "" da . 199 po c Y of � '�_..� !AN i ,stage prepaid. Y Pre red Notice Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the / L day of L /L...LA.4 , 19 ° I.7 f• a OFFICIAL SEAL `� DIANE M JELDERKS _ ‘ n ;�rf V / NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON E:, COMMISSION NO 046142 \ ' �/, i Lc 1; MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07, 1999 NO PUBLI 0 OREGON My Commission ' . Tres: FILE INFO.: 7 VANE(51: m A- tat/ c . uzyz f 4 ivi Poz6 :ASE NO.(S): cup q6 "'RE OF NOTICE & DATE: ij 41 4" / I, $ � 'u 9� Aeli-1- • December 11, 2003 t''4161 Leah Fredericks CITY OF TIGARD Cingular Wireless • OREGON 2701 NW Vaughn, Suite 890 Portland, OR 97210 RE: MMD 2002 -00012 Cingular (Walnut Street) Modification extension re Dear Ms. Fredericks: This letter is in response to your request received on December 8, 2003 for a one -year extension to the approval of the Cingular Wireless Modification approval (Case File MMD 2002 - 00012) of CUP96 -0009. Your request has been approved based on the following findings of fact in consideration of the criteria of Tigard Development Code Section 18.360.030(D). 1. No changes are made on the original site development review plan as approved by the director. The approved plans have not been altered from those that were approved except where required by city staff. 2. The applicant can show intent of initiating construction on the site within the one year extension period; and According to the applicant, the delay was due to economic factors, and construction is expected to begin at the beginning of 2004. 3. There have been no changes to the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. There have been no changes to the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinances that would affect this approval. Based on the above findings, the case will now expire December 10, 2004 If you have any questions, call me at (503)639 -4171 ext. 2428. Sinc ely, G• M rgan racy, AICP Associate Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 h • • cingular WIRELESS December 5, 2003 RE C LEAVED Mr. Morgan Tracy City of Tigard G1751 OF IVA Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Requested one -year extension of zoning permits MMD2002 -0012 Dear Mr. Tracy: On behalf of Cingular Wireless and Salmon PCS, I would like to request a one -year extension to the current zoning permit referenced in this letter. The current expiration date of this permits and the new expiration dates with the one -year extension request are as follows: MMD2002 -0012: Current Expiration — 12/10/03. New Expiration with 1 Year Extension — December 10, 2004 We make this request due to a delay in our deployment efforts throughout this market. Due primarily to economic concerns, budgeting of this project was frozen until the end of 2003. Deployment efforts are anticipated to begin again — including construction — at the beginning of 2004. This extension would allow us to complete this fixed period of delay and provide us enough time in the beginning of 2004 to complete construction efforts related to this zoning permit. In addition, we warrant that no changes have been made to the site plan as submitted and approved and that there have been no changes to the development code on which the original approval was based. Please feel free to contact me directly with any further questions or concerns related to this request. Thank you, Leah Fredericks Cingular Wireless / Salmon PCS 503 223 1689 leah.fredericks@cingular.com Cingular Wireless • 2701 NW Vaughn. • Suite 890 • Portland, OR 97210 • • Date/Time Stamp 1/15/2004 3:37 PM ��';� j mall All - New Records City of Tigard, Oregon Transmittal Form Department: Community Development Account: 2230 Date: January 15, 2004 Current Planning Division Prepared by: Patty Lunsford, Planning Secretary Extension: 2438 Date: Retention Retention Record Series Description: From To Code: Period: Title: Planning — Land Use File Modification. Same as land TO BE MICROFILMED WITH ORIGINAL LAND USE 12/11/03 use files APPLICATION THAT IS ALREADY ON MICROFILM To be microfilmed and added to MMD2002- 00012 OF CUP96 -0009 fireissiMiti • MMD2002- 00012 /CINGULAR WIRELESS Already entered into Clerks Index. This just needs incorporated into the file. Contains a 1 -year extension approval letter, request, and receipt for payment. New expiration date is 12/10/04. KEYWORDS: TO BE COMPLETED BY RECORDS DIVISION STAFF Received by: Date Medium: Received: Clerk's Index: Clerk's Index Record Identification Yes ❑ No ❑ Date of Entry: Code: I: \CURPLN \MASTERS \TRANSMITTAL -LAND USE FILES.DOC • • * 1 June 10, 2002 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Ed Fournier 25977 SW Canyon Creek Road Wilsonville, OR 97070 RE: Minor Modification Request of CUP96 -0009, Case File No. MMD2002 -00012 Dear Mr. Fournier: This letter is in response to your request for a Minor Modification (MMD2002- 00012) of the approved site development and conditional use permit located at 12925 SW Pacific Highway, WCTM 2S102BD, Tax Lot 02600. You have requested to add additional antenna array and associated equipment cabinets to the existing monopole. The submitted site and elevation plans reflect the current conditions and proposed additions. Analysis of Modification Request: Section 18.360.060 of the Tigard Development Code Site Development Review chapter, states; "any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in section 18.360.050 shall be considered a minor modification." Section 18.360.050 states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. The proposal does not involve residential property. Therefore, this standard does not apply. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is not applicable, as this request does not involve a residential development. 3. A change that requires additional on -site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The proposed wireless communication facility is not required to provide any parking, pursuant to the parking demand table in TDC 18.765. Therefore, no additional on -site parking is needed. 1 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. No change in the structural occupancy type of the structure is proposed. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. The applicant has proposed to establish the new antennae at 59 feet above ground level on the existing 78 foot pole. No increase to the pole height is proposed. Therefore, this standard is met. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off -site traffic would be affected. No changes to the site layout or accesses are proposed, therefore this criterion is satisfied. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. The existing and proposed conditional uses are similar in nature in terms of traffic generation, approximately 1 trip per month. This modification will double that trip generation to 2 trips per month, significantly below the 100 trip per day threshold. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 - - • - • • 8. An increase in the floor areas proposed for a non - residential use by more than ten percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The proposal will add impervious area where the concrete pad for the equipment cabinets will be located. This expansion is approximately 120 square feet, below the 5,000 square foot limitation. The expansion will also occur within the established fence enclosure. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by the code or reduces the open space areas by more than ten percent. There is no common open space required for this type of development, therefore this standard does not apply. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and/or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by the code or by more than ten percent where specified in the site plan. There are no specific amenities provided by the existing development. The amount of landscaping exceeds the 15% minimum required in this zone. Two arborvitae will be removed to accommodate the relocated utility meter, but these two arborvitae will be replaced on the southwest edge of the fence enclosure. Therefore this criterion is met. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that is not the subject of criteria (B). 1 through 10 above. The site was developed prior to the present Wireless Communications Facility Ordinance (TDC 18.798) and was approved through a conditional use process, CUP 96 -0009. There were no additional conditions of that approval. Since no conditions are adversely impacted, this criterion is satisfied. THIS REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THIS LETTER WITH YOUR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site. The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will continue to promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that, development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable local, state, and federal laws. If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 639 -4171 ext. 407. Sincerely, • Morgan racy Associate Planner is \curpin \morgan \workspace \sdr \mmd2002 -00012 (cingular walnut).doc Page 2 of 2 • M E R I C O M - C O R P O R A T I O N May 30, 2002 Mr. Morgan Tracy City of Tigard Community Development Department RECEIVED /C CD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. C Tigard, OR 97223 _ CITY OF TIGARD RE: Salmon PCS; Minor Modification ApplicatigryNING /ENGINEERING Dear Mr. Tracy: On behalf of Salmon PCS, I am submitting the following Application for a Minor Modification to a CUP to collocate upon an existing mono -pole and place equipment in an existing fenced equipment compound located at 12925 SW Pacific Highway. Please find enclosed five copies of the following: • Minor Modification Application form • Applicant's Statement • Site Plans • Owner's Written Authorization — Copy of a Letter of Authorization & Deed • CWS Service Provider Letter Please find enclosed one copy of the following: • 8.5" x 11" Site Plan • Filing Fee: a check for $100.00 is enclosed Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, MERICOM CORPORATION • a d Es) . Fournier Senior Project Manager Direct Line: 503/303 -3012 E -Mail: Ed.Fournier @Mericom.com 25977 SW CANYON CREEK ROAD, SUITE E, WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070, U.S.A. TELEPHONE: (503) 303 -3000 / FAX: (503) 303 -3001 II • MINOR MODIFICATION %',, �4 �� 1 TYPE I APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hal! Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 6394171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 • GENERAL INFORMATION • 12925 SW Pacific Highway • • Property Address/Location(s): FOR STAFF USE•O�1LY • 2S- 1 -02BD -02600 �• t.'I� - • Tax Map & Tax Lot #(s): ,r , — � Case 'NON: � • Site Size: 0.87 AC / r: • C fh'1 r: she (s): . Mericom Corporation as Agent , '. , ; A • Applicant ": Salmon PCS. I I f !RdCeipi.' .tic :• a►. , �-�' ' ; Maw Creek Road, Suite E ted?B . °� TIM I•' / `�`a Address: 25977 SW Canyon pplicat(on - i: A i•ep ,Y':. _ 97070 - -_ : i • City/State: Wilsonville, OR Zhp: ! (t {e;. *i! 1 i .r .•:-;::.. . Primary Contact: Ed Fournier • Phone: 503 - 303 -3012 Fax: 303 -3001 � •� -• -� '' •• • • . {r7ate Det i itiedtCompl�t Property Owner /Deed Holder(s) ": (Attach list if more than one) :;:::� ...; . t � : :. �tu urp G :. ` st�tsY 'rel ��n1(+orrfia?`m�t`: Robert & Hae Lim Kim, with a land lease to AirTouch / American Rtivt:�e ph one: 626 -8014 Address: SW Woodward Way Pho 87225 City/State: Portland, OR Zip: _ • • When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant MITTA S REQUIRED UB UB L ELEMENTS must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written REg REQ applications ED will L be accepted authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) without the required submittal elem must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY I /� �- Application Form • The owners of record of the subject property request permission for a pwner's Signature/Written Authorization Minor Modification. To review a modification as a Minor [j Transfer Instrument or Deed - Modification, the Director must first find that the expansion does not U invoke one or more of the 11 criteria discussed within Section Site Development Plan (3 copies) 18.120.070(B) of the Tigard Development Code. If the modification fj exceeds the maximum allowed under any one or more of the y Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'11"x 11 ") following criteria, a Major Modification review is required. Major p Modifications are processed in the same manner as address s Site j APplicanYs Statement (3 copies) Development Review. In a separate letter, please ® Add _ ro t's Stat Under I es .050(B� . c riteria below contained in Section 18.360.050(B) including a detailed $100.00 response to each criteria. ® Filing Fee (City,) 1. An Increase in dwelling density or lot coverage for development I (Urban) $236.00 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. - — .. 3. A change that requires additional on -site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. In addition, the Director must find that the S. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20% ro sec change complies with the underlying 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be p t� t standards of the applicable ith 9 district. T.c affected. complete this review, the Applicant's propose .chi • 7. An Ines per d pe in o vehicular traffic to and from the site and increase can be expected to exceed i00 must include a discussion indicating how the asion will continue to comply with the 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non-residential use by more than 10% exduding site a minimum n lion k building height, parkin comply wi lane expansions under 5.000 square feet ndscaping standards. Other 'apPlicablc 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the p ercent la la uiements such a minimum Clear Vls than ten p ble open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more areas near driveways and street intersection may also be applicable depending on when Pi reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening, and/or, landscaping P rovisi) the building expansion is proposed to bi below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10% where specified in the site plan II. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not constructed on the site. • • APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS• as application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. _ described on the front of this app _ _ _ _ _ — — _ (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) • THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: •oes , t• a : .' seed property, • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. • DATED this day of , 20 See attached E &T Agreement Owner's Signature • Owner's Signature • Owner's Signature Owner's Signature • • • • • • Applicants Statement — Project Overview AirTouch Cellular (now purchased by American Tower Corporation (ATC)) has an existing 76' mono pole upon the property with an existing 34' x 33' fenced enclosure, permitted via CUP 96 -0009. Salmon PCS, LLC (Salmon) proposes collocation upon the pole with 2 antennas per sector attached onto the existing mono -pole at an elevation of 59'. The proposed installation consists of installing 3 small equipment cabinets approximately (30 "x30 "x60" tall) that will be located upon a concrete pad. As call volume increases at the site additional cabinets may be added. As the, proposed development shall occur entirely within the area leased from the land owner to American Tower Corporation, a copy of the Entry and Testing agreement signed by American Tower is enclosed as written authorization for this land use application. Impact to public facilities and services will be minimal. Access shall be via the existing paved parking lot from SW Pacific Highway. During construction or operation of the site, minimal traffic would be generated as a result of the facility. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. Telephone service and electrical power are the only public facilities required by the proposed site, and are available at the site. Salmon's proposed site is an unmanned facility, and would not require any water, waste treatment or management of hazardous materials. No improvements to public facilities are needed to accommodate this development. The proposed communication facility will not interfere with surrounding properties or their uses, and will not cause interference with any electronic equipment, such as telephones, televisions, or radios. Non - interference is ensured by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulation of radio transmissions. Salmon PCS Technology Similar to cellular technology, Salmon systems use "cells" or geographic coverage areas that resemble a honeycomb pattern to provide service. Typically, one antenna fixture and a base station area located within each cell area. The base station is comprised of equipment cabinets about the size of small refrigerators. The wireless PCS digital technology is emerging as a necessary emergency service and business tool, as well as a convenience for personal and family use. PCS will provide two -way mobile voice communication, two -way paging /short message service, data transmission, voice mail, and conference calling through compact devices. The new digital technology also produces a higher quality transfer of voice and data than the analog /digital hybrid systems currently in use by the cellular carriers. System Information Salmon, a Cingular Wireless affiliate, is currently developing a digital PCS (Personal Communications System) throughout Oregon. Upon completion of this network, Salmon will operate a state of the art digital network of wireless communication sites throughout Oregon, and in connection with other nationwide Cingular market areas. Mericom Corporation (Mericom) is responsible for the development of many of the Salmon sites and provides a broad range of professional services; to include program management, land use planning, site acquisition, construction management, and technical services. Mericom, on behalf of Salmon, has submitted this application. The proposed use would allow Salmon to provide the needed service to the surrounding community and to this heavily traveled portion of Highway 99W. The need for specific service is determined by market demand, capacity requirements for a specific geographic area, and the need to provide continuous coverage from one site to another in a particular geographic region. Once the need for additional capacity or enhanced coverage in a particular area has been established, Salmon's Radio Frequency (RF) engineers identify a target area ( "search ring ") to locate a new facility. The required site location and antenna height is determined by an engineering study. This study evaluates radio signal propagation over the desired coverage area based on topography, geographic features and possible signal • • attenuation due to seasonal changes in vegetation. It is desirable to have direct line of sight from the base station antennas to the required coverage objectives. Based on the topography and the amount of traffic in the servicing area, Salmon's RF engineers determined that the above listed antenna elevation upon the existing tower would enable them to meet their coverage objectives. It is crucial for Salmon to have adequate coverage in this area in order to serve customers in compliance with its FCC license regulations. Other specifics of the proposed installation are addressed on the enclosed site plan and responses to applicable Code Sections including 18.798.050. • • CONDITIONAL USES (Chapter 18.330) Per Chapter 18.330.20.C, the application meets the criteria of a Minor modification to a CUP. The applicant has submitted the required forms and other submittal elements for City approval of this request via a Type I procedure. 18.330.030 Approval Standards and Conditions of Approval A. Approval standards. The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; The proposed development does not significantly modify the existing compound area nor mono -pole. This criteria was addressed and met via the original CUP. 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; There shall be no adverse impact to the property or surrounding land uses by the proposed development. The proposed development does not significantly modify the existing compound area nor mono -pole. This criteria was addressed and met via the original CUP. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; Impact to public facilities and services will be minimal. Access shall be via the existing paved parking lot from SW Pacific Highway. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. No improvements to public facilities are needed to accommodate this development. Salmon's proposed site is an unmanned facility, and would not require any water, waste treatment or management of hazardous materials. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter; The underlying zoning district criteria have been met and are further detailed in the narrative section regarding Chapter 18.520. The proposed development does not significantly modify the existing compound are nor mono -pole. This criteria was addressed and met via the original CUP. 5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050; and 18.330.050 Additional Development Standards for Conditional Use Types 16. Emergency Services and Basic Utilities: a. Minimum lot size shall be 5,000 square feet; This lot is .87 acres in size and exceeds the Chapter requirements. b. Minimum setbacks shall be those in the applicable zone; This existing mono -pole was approved via a CUP permitting the pole location and height. The proposed development does not significantly modify the existing compound area nor mono -pole. The CG code allows for setbacks of 20' from residential districts, which is met by this development. c. Height limitation shall be in accordance with Chapter 18.730; This existing mono -pole was approved via a CUP permitting the pole location and height. The proposed development does not significantly modify the existing compound area nor mono -pole. d. Off -street parking and loading requirement shall be in accordance with Chapter 18.765; and • • No specific requirements for wireless communications facilities are listed in Chapter 18.765. This criteria teria as addressed and approved via the existing CUP. The proposed development does not significantly modify the existing development. e. Screening shall be in accordance with Chapter 18.745. This existing mono -pole and equipment compound was approved via a CUP. The proposed development does not significantly modify the existing compound area and only 2 of the existing arborvitae will be impacted by the proposed development. These 2 arborvitae shall be replaced with 2 new plans as shown upon the Site Plans. 6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. Other applicable Chapters are discussed in this narrative. This development is not subject to Chapter 18.780, as no site signs are proposed, and Chapter 18.360 is not applicable as the only application for this proposed development is for a Minor Modification to an existing CUP via a Type I application. IMPACT STUDY (Chapter 18.390) Impact to public facilities and services will be minimal. Access shall be via the existing access roadway from Highway 99W. During construction or operation of the site, minimal traffic would be generated as a result of the facility. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. Telephone service and electrical power are the only public facilities required by the proposed site, and will be arranged with the local private utility companies. Salmon's proposed site is an unmanned facility, and would not require any water, waste treatment or management of hazardous materials. No improvements to public facilities are needed to accommodate this development. COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Chapter 18.520) In general this Chapter described allowable uses in Commercial Districts. Specifically, Chapter 18.520.030 (Table 18.520.1) lists Wireless Communications Facilities as a Permitted use, subject to Chapter 18.798. Table 18.520.2 lists numerical criteria for this District. While the proposed mono -pole development is specifically subject to Chapter 18.798, but please note that, the existing mono -pole met the setback requirements via the original CUP. This development does not propose significant modification of the equipment compound or the existing landscaping nor site coverage percentages. Only the height of the proposed mono -pole (76') exceeds the underlying Zoning District (CG) requirements of 45' maximum. However, this height is permitted by the original CUP. Chapter 18.520.60 lists no additional criteria or guidelines for the CG Zone. ACCESS (Chapter 18.705 ) The parcel is currently developed as a small retail building and a ATC mono -pole facility. This Chapter was addressed during the approval of the CUP with the original development. No changes to the previously approved access is proposed. Current requirements are met with at least 1 access point meeting the minimum access width of 30' and the minimum pavement width of 24'. OFF - STREET PARKING /LOADING (Chapter 18.765) The parcel is currently developed as a small retail building and a ATC mono -pole facility. This Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original CUP for the ATC facility. No changes to the previously approved loading or parking areas are proposed. Chapter 18.765.040 sets no minimum requirement for parking for wireless telecommunications developments. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. • • PARKING (Chapter 18.765.040) Please see the above narrative addressing Off - street parking / loading (Chapter 18.765). TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS & MITIGATION (Chapter 18.790) The parcel is currently developed as a small retail building and a ATC mono -pole facility. This Chapter was addressed during the approval of the CUP with the original development. No tree removal is proposed. Removal of the 2 arborvitae to accommodate the Verizon service H -frame are less than 6" in trunk diameter and do not qualify as trees as defined in Chapter 18.790. These 2 arborvitae shall be replaced as shown upon the attached Site Plans. CLEAR VISION AREA (Chapter 18.795) The parcel is currently developed as a small retail building and a ATC mono -pole facility with a primary access point to SW Pacific Highway. This Chapter was addressed during the approval of the CUP with the original development. No changes to the previously approved clear vision area are proposed. WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES (CHAPTER 18.798.050) A. Uses permitted. The Director shall review the uses subject to Site Development Review, as regulated by Chapter 18.360, using approval criteria contained in Section B below. The following uses are subject to approval under this section: 1. Towers in commercial zones and the I -P zone. A tower, including antennas, other support equipment and /or accessory equipment buildings, in any commercial or I -P district, provided that such a tower shall be set back from any existing off-site residence by a distance equal to the height of the tower; The existing mono -pole is not set back from the adjacent apartment building the distance equal to the height of the tower. However, the tower shall not be modified in any way by this proposed development and was originally approved via the CUP of the original development. The applicant's collocation is subject to a Minor Modification to the existing CUP. B. Review criteria. Any use subject to Site Development Review per Section A above, shall be evaluated using the following standards: 1. Aesthetic: a. New towers shall maintain a non - reflective gray finish or, if required by the FAA, be painted pursuant to the FAA's requirements; Not applicable. No modifications shall be made to the existing mono -pole b. If collocation on an existing tower is requested, the design of any antenna(s), accessory structures or equipment shall, to the extent possible, use materials, colors and textures that will match the existing tower or non -tower structure to which the equipment of the collocating provider is being attached; The proposed antennas and attachment hardware shall be of a similar dull gray non - reflective color as the existing mono -pole described in Section B.1.b above. • • c. If collocation on an existing non -tower structure is requested, the antenna(s) and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment shall be a neutral color that is the same as the color as the supporting structure so as to make the antenna(s) and related equipment as visually unobtrusive as possible. The proposed antennas and attachment hardware shall be of a similar dull gray non - reflective color as the existing mono -pole described in Section B.1.b above. 2. Setbacks: a. Towers designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back in accordance with the setbacks contained in the base zone; The base zone required a 20' setback from adjacent residentially zoned property. The existing mono -pole does meet this criteria. No modifications shall be made to the existing mono -pole b. Towers not designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back from the property line by a distance equal to the height of the tower. Not applicable. No modifications shall be made to the existing mono -pole 3. Tower spacing: No new tower shall be allowed within 500 feet of an existing tower. If, having completed the collocation protocol outlined in Section 18.798.080 without success, the provider will be required to build a tower less than 500 feet from an existing tower, it will be required to obtain a Type I adjustment governed by 18.370.020 C8b; Not applicable. No modifications shall be made to the existing mono -pole. 4. Tower height: No tower shall exceed 100 feet for a single user or 125 for multiple users; Not applicable. No modifications shall be made to the existing mono -pole. 5. Lighting: No lighting shall be permitted on a tower except as required by the FAA; Not applicable. No modifications shall be made to the existing mono -pole. 6. Fencing and security: For security purposes, towers and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a minimum six -foot fence; The existing equipment compound is enclosed by a chain -link fence 7 feet high. Please see the Site Plans for further detail. 7. Landscaping and screening: a. Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs which reach six feet in height and 95% opacity within three years of planting; Please see the attached Site Plans for further detail. The proposed development does not significantly modify the existing compound area and only 2 of the existing arborvitae will be impacted by the proposed development. These 2 arborvitae shall be replaced with 2 new plans as shown upon the Site Plans. b. When adjacent to or within residentially -zoned property, free - standing towers and accessory equipment facilities shall be screened by the planting of a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height at the time of planting. The planting of said trees shall be prescribed in number by a plan prepared by a registered arborist in locations that (1) most effectively screen the wireless facilities from residential uses and (2) promote the future survival of the trees while limiting adverse effects of the trees on abutting properties. Existing evergreen trees at least 15 • • feet in height may be used to meet the screening requirement of this section if the arborist demonstrates that they provide screening for abutting residential uses; This proposed compound development is located on property zoned CG, and adjacent to residentially -zoned property. In the existing CUP (96- 0009), screening was addressed in Section 18.120.108.4 A &B. It was determined at that time that the existing conifer and deciduous trees with heights ranging from 14' to 24' (back in 1996) were acceptable to screen the facility. As these trees have grown is height and size over the past 5 -6 years, and the applicant is not proposing modifications to the existing pole height or significant modifications to the existing compound, this criteria is deemed to be met. 8. Noise: Noise - generating equipment shall be sound - buffered by means of baffling, barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 dBA (day) /40 dBA (night) when adjacent to a noise - sensitive land use and 75 dBA (day) /60 dBA (night) when adjacent to other uses. The proposed development complies with the above listed noise levels. The equipment has no external HVAC units to produce noticeable noise. C. Other requirements. At the time a provider requests a building permit, it must demonstrate compliance to all applicable state and federal regulations, including, but not limited to, the Oregon Uniform Structural and Building Codes and FAA. Salmon shall comply with applicable state and federal regulations, and provide the required evidence upon the request for a building permit. STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS (Chapter 18.810) The parcel is currently developed as a small retail building and a ATC mono -pole facility. This Chapter was addressed during the approval of the CUP with the original development. No changes to the previously approved street improvements are proposed. The only utilities needed by this development are power and telephone service and shall be arranged with the local service providers and will be extended to the proposed development site as governed by 18.818.120 Utilities. This criteria is addressed upon the attached Site Plans. • l ' • • CSW Site Assessment • • • • • Sent by Mericom. Corp. 5033033001; - c `''''' l 6: 63m4;: etFa , • 317;Page "• /1- ', _L .I t L � File Number 1 qL1 S • CleanWat APR 1 7 200 // \ Servic a er Sery c Our commitment is clear. By Sensitive • rea Pre - Screening Site Assessment • Jurisdiction 1 (cam Date (7 -02 Map & Tax Lot 9 /- 02$ b- 02 6 0 o Owner R-0 8eiP -7 -4- 44F- l- ■ ∎ '" Site Address /2- L(? SW P r it7t-- Z ■ vv\ t4- (C /4-utiwy Contact Ei F 00 (2.14 i et?.. Proposed Activity ,0-0 f e (3zu i P, @ - r" Address ZS 77 7 $ M) C#Piror e .RP. E M-N1 .x 1 s T? M> c e r 1 j Iso,v 1/P� ok_ 97Q ?t S 2 T'F ' Phone 503 303 --3 d l Z /31:64601 lfaD(. Y N NA Y N NA E ❑ n Sensitive Area Composite Map ID 0 ® S OS # wa���nfrastructure maps Map# 2.5/ 4)4 ? • Locally adopted studies or maps Other n n rF I Specify ❑ Specify 000 Amp: / J ew Based on a review of the above information and the requirements of Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order No. 00 -7: ❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200' of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. ham! Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or. within 200' of the site. This pre- screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. ❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. . Comments: 6 4.0 ..1e/ P+r SA "0.4 o 1 d20c9 ever; «/ p 4.-re ) rig Y o go or .»r.'al/Y 0'49 ;tivP a.✓ •• cyreneo y+. .4* D.�r'0/ ' Reviewed By: Date: y - w — O Post-it® Fax Note 7671 Date 4._d ., lpages► / Returned to Applicant 1I Mail u Fax ,A Counter To �7 �ourn er FromG�4`tt 6vtp lc. flow Date N-A 1f -0, By.�(�_ 6 Co. /Dept. Co. CAS f, Phone # Phone # A So3-frg6- 3 -53 Fax #I)3- 303.300/ Fax# • w • r .'i ^ t. `, 111 : _ s . li . .... ... , .:N , —,.. , -; r . • .. . •:,.r .:..j•Ln'rf F` 6 .s \. �t1R1, � i', ;-' ` � j r ' '- ., .,g, a' - • .,F. ,' • • Title Transfer Instrument or Deed ,.& Authorization (Entry and Testing Agreement) . . - :.... • . • •• -..• • • ••• - , '.:.• 'F.' kr•'. '''...... • - 7.- ' ' 1 . . . ' • . • • • - . • ' liec'elvecl: 4/22/02 1 :58pm; . _ > Me r icoth Corp .• ; Page 2.. • . . . ... . ,, ,...., , .,, ,.% .::,.; , t.. ,, ,i.i,, ,.., , ,,, ‘,..., .,. , ,,., .. , e ...,,... ....„. „,.......,,,.. „.... •• 64/2210.z. MON 13: 45 FAX 150394,96 . . SBA . - • . ..• .z002 • • . • . . . . . . : • . 1 • , . • . 1 . . . . .. . . , '' 6.3,X5V02 AX MON 14:01 F 16039639696 Stk • • • " , .... . • -, , - ' ' ,. '..,11:'"....,,'ai.-.' , '• '', . , . .._.. — .-. i . • . • . . • • ' i • . . . . • ' ' • •••- „-■.:::'.',, :.0 .• , ,.. . ; . • . . . . . • • • :' . • . • . , , . . .. .. . • • - • , • • . • " . - - . . • • • , . . . • . - . .• . • i P r - 3 ''' ' • ' . ' '' ' .' ' • • • • 1 • L . . • • I . . . . . . . . • . . :..• ' --.1 • • .......„''. • .. ''.•' • . 1 , • . • ' . , ' . ' . ' , 1 . ' r ' , .•' ", '! . • . ''' , .. , . . • „ ... --, :: %. .'4:1*$, , ''''' ' ' ..'. . , I • . . . . • . . . . ,. • . , , s . . • • , , , White ;Ti • . - Site II) 082liOS • • Mt*: • - . . . . . .. --: • . . . .- • • .- • i . , . . • • • • • . . 3 . . . . . . . , . . • . • . , . . .-. • ' . • •.!•;'!, ,,.+ , s•4. ,,Y ' • •, ■• .' ,', ; t 4 i • . . • AsizeriCse Tower- L.P. • .:: • ' • ' . '. - : .. . . • .• .-::, ,: .. ■ ...,••••• %, :: . ,: ..„.; .... : . F. • • ENI'ILY AND TPATING AGM' . • ,. :. .'• '... .. • , '',.:' :.' •"s'''ct..!; ,.• • • '‘:. • •., .: ,q,!', ':,•;•'5:7;,••• : :••• ..., . ,• . t: • . :.,, . .....,•:..‘, -, ,,,,.•,:•,, , , , :„') . ,,k..v. , ..;ri„rwm)* , %.1,4,.....: '..",‘ , . .. _ _ . • , ... . • , .. .21113 )1Prrit..Y4kiti'D 21f8rOTIG AGESSMXT (Aigannter) t4 rnda anddinteroidiODDIS of the Agarra'.. • •••: , •,•••. ,:„ -.•,.., • ; ..• • • • ' ' ‘; ''. ' ' • • '' - • ' aAy at....;„-• 20)2, laY mod between IglimitM.JOIEWSILIM ('Comp') aril Auenicais Tower. 14: Sid . ...,....;',„T,....r.' ",*:.., .,. .;, • •, , • . . it Affiliates C`Cti me). conotreing the fhliewing desclihadialintetY *laza bf Owaltre'P!oPag,t6-, , ...-,.. •';!:: - "i', ? .•. ' . • • ", '''' , ..: . . • , , .., • . . .. A ce h„ •„* t i itostapircetgaiiisg) tha Pavia:sty Ate IWO 433 Or 111311. J.,' ='1 , '•'. '-, •• '• • •,A ...,:,., ..;;,.:•••,:...,..... :.;;;,. ; late firs the reolkItt and Itaisittilsalcu OiNteixeless OftiaggalliCadanO Mali i sad • • •: • - 2 ..': . ,; ,:, .... : -• ! 1 . -.. ••'. 't • ' ., , . . n. fft;'order for aCer*Or t datemitte the Viability and fee:ability Delius Trap:tiny as Otoliet or " '. • " '' . . • . . ' : ' l i . ag ., . . • • . . „ , • . • =wow lite, it ii Deeelasty for tooploycas, ents ox indepoldezt ecietreobets of "Comouly" to tater lotion 2 , ., 1 .,., . , • .. 1 . • ' • . and impact the 'Pry:goody amdfor toroptirszily loetne sonimunications equips:not ein the'Preparty to eenduer ' •,', . • ,... •.:,. ...‘ '.. • .•:. .. , •• • 'short term midiii propagation tests and to make soPliectioo ad& IsPeal, abate and fedosel seseerinneural • . • . ,- -t ',,!.• , - . . the eerxiival ofthe kronernt ea a towarbt antenna itte: and . . .. 4 . • . • . • C. admier and 41 Cteorporty" . i dash* tie peovido tbr sal ez■trY ripe% iolpe edoe, ond/ot testi)* . , . • ' . ., .,,,..! #adaig144 fOld arlidioetioos sonserning the ralpany pursuant to the rerun criatahrod In this Agreement . :, . . , . . .. . • • • • . • • . • • • . . , . . • broW,I.I'MPARIFORIC, in *widen:Aka of the annual promisee, oovnoleit . undertakings aed • '.. ' ". - • .'., : .: . ' . ••: ' , ,.. • other rensitletatkui sat forth in &it Agmemeet, Cteatet and ''Cotupzuse * epee follows: • ' • ' . , • , . •• .' ; ,•, :•,. , . . • : •- ' . . , , , ... . . . .• . . . . 1. aillitat, Donor consents •eydegrees that ''Cosopeny'' lb targdoyaos, agents and independent *. • ...s "..•• • .•;' ,. . . ., . . • • coottacterc (NAtithozized Pitttice") may*enter won the Property to combatt bed paten eons* at all of the • • tent:wing activities ("Pesnoitted Activities"): survey*, geeteebedeal soil besiege and analyses, phase I • • . • • . . envineneental cledin. boundary surveys, radio propagatien mediae ttnd *nab other mate and forpectioni of ' ,,.,': • ' • ; ' ••• • : • Th° i've/Pal7 wkok "CemPoir luaY au= Ite!eiv•arf as adViSabk. "CovainAyg treed tolxs rciponsifile tar ' ., : .. ."- .... ' • ' . Guy and all moo related to the petaitaa. Acties. including itudanotrezi on end oposatjon wad reniOval of ''., •:• ,'' •.• . ^.'• ',1. • • ,'• , - • ' , . . , - . ' - ' . . • upapseent =Oa Proputy. • . . . , . . „. . . . .. • . . . • • , .. . . . . . ..•... • . . . . . .„ , ••• .• • , • • I liblilL 06 volar ennaliels and aria& that SID 'Authorized pastiest may make Out ille - ' ':": • ' . .. .applications mai Owner's behalf os' such loca1 . stunt end &dew. gavetemearal entities whose agprovel: • • ‘. ' • • N Oterpate Moir etesaider Yuman or advisable re have the Property approved as a•touier . eS euteMile Site. • . . ": : ' ' • ' .. • . • 61 0104, but sbg Umnied to govaternestet approvals for sozang veriantot, teronlog 40plinatione. blifidink! . ...',.'..'“;',.'• ' ' ' ‘ " ' . Pawn% and wat.taingl poi, °Weer hereby agrees that an executed stopy ofthis Agreement Una offeatiiic' ..!,• • '', ' •••••''',:•••••'''...• • . '— • .' • , • .., . . u the original. 1..fiewevuz, if requested by th e AutbaltiZed Parties, Ownce agrees to taceeom sot* ogaz ,i14::,:. ...,‘ '. . ';'• ' ' ... • . , ••„, , • -,... - ..., . fords= docturicat es poly be required by fbo governmental amity is question to cvidetieci Osinsez 'einuotat' ' •••`'.. '''' ''`' '" ' ' • ' .1 ' ' ' • :;•?,;".:•,: "" ' ' • • •."' to 410 Atoka valt.ch is presumed tea be • , ... . .1 . • . . .. . • . - . • , . , . .. . • • , 3- AeFeilx C3oehar agrees that tbo A,uthotired Patties' ItzsY mats mPott the literieseY. Poldban the ' '. • ' '' . ' - , . • . , , . *. Permitted Activrios upon execution of Ilia Algernon end raaY lava agetss l'Y IllY PrefontrY for ufi.to SO ' - ' : '''''.." • '''' '' ' • ' .• . '. . days. . ,. • . • . . . .. , . • • • . . - • , • 1 . . . • • . . . . . . , • . , • • •,... i, . . • . . .. . . . . . . . , . • . . • . • . • . . . , - • I • • . . , . . - I ' . • • - , . . . . . . ., . . • , I . • . , . • . .. • , • • • . . • . , . • • • . . - • • • . • • . • . . • • • • , . ' • '." :- ,::,.' • -.• :., • •• ' • . . . . • • . . • i . • . . .. . • . . .. . . • • . . , 1 • . . . • . . . • . . • , , . . • • . ovo • , • • - .! . . : . • • . • . • . 1 . • I • . • .. , . . . . . . i . • . . • • : . • , . . . . . . . • . ' • • ' • • : .: • ,. ' • ,. c i ' ', • : .• .. • • • • , • !, • , . i • . • • . . . • tIO'd 99eStt ' . • ' -• - tT:IT E0OZADVAIVf4H'' , . . . • . • • II■meomme■r . , • . . .. . . ,•• „ . 1 '.1 : } .':+M: 17 . 4 7:: • ;',..,:,i ',. ,' . - , .. -a'�l - F'-i'} I r. ,7,:.• i' !1 Received 4/22/02 1 :57PM ->. Mericom Corp : ; ;Page 3 - *', A.4/22 • MON 13:46 FAX 1503 SBA ' ' 1 r 003 041ia MOON 14:02 FAX 1 �? '?, ,�7 u t4 :).." � 4. a•c o wai of Property. "Compeer agrees that it will. opal the examination of the Oaten of this 4 •w: � Ae . + 40Y equl meta installed ap . a tae Property pert orris. P Act:Whis . rapes way ••.', ' >.•; • deans* to the Piope l y that what bevel bean coned to eceOcetion tries stay Of tar PetmitpoA AO:Nit6er sad' ' '1'. :. • 'r: %9,111 t tt *era tbo ]'4bperty to the • coadhiota is %V&A in berms 4 Ceaeopsay e' cosy Onto the Property. lo the .J ' ear , , :. , • > 1Y oqutpmeet b st.11ed on the Property by "Conan' hoot 1y kemAvcd, Owes V4)1 41 •ba Lt to • ' ' • . .. • *annoy. . suck eqs i ___ wad "Cottlpaoy' apnea to he responsible fbe the reaaoaublo tames of suehrarnoval. , ,, tut taq • 5. fahos iat'ty- "Cautopeny" agrees to itadta.auE,�► cav hezt ens end dot end Owner, its direrotatal, s', :' ' y ' y a +0 Favpa'ttY meaa$aaeisr agent., kcal .,fiat a y, kc Pad ail olafaa. aceamA.�' ' S , '' .; ti,... + , , • ,}'' • dosages, n y� y clad expense is eotoo4eattdn ash portent) igit>:y attrd/arda>oeats m pa'epeiey esis+iwt from '�� T`� • {; ' 'eferx., c ;' : x . _ or nit 6f nay oa t>eseaea b. upon a at the Peopetty canned by tite act we omission vitae ae ,Autoifs.d Patten'�., ' . : :� ' I : w+ '' '0,....,'1 , f o od tit P a r o d s Activities. . A y drf an e s P I by' Compare of etaY snob claims, aciiotsa: ` 1. ,•',..'i,■;' ;.' • ;_ • . :.,''' N donnas, ltiMlity and etatreaoo will be cortduct�ed by inam-y* chalets by' Crap y" Sod : •:x! ° .; n • .. , 1:;: ,r 1 ' ' "' • be liable for tae` payment td' ant/ sod ell court emit; oa psmcs of lit�atitas. reasonable irao® feel c sad , ; , 1:=t , - • .,, - .. ..a'yludgi ent ibiit lie eadeeeatheit i� ;,,,,, , : 4, 1 `` 6. Y .,�artrasee. At Owae><'s request. "4` *grecs to provide a or illas of �'i '•,1° ..t .,k;'..,•; 1; , " , .,,t •1• , j dvidt�amg "Cotrl>p„s insurance govaatagn. ;; �t c •;:- ,.r. 7- CAvedriitbeIlaw- The pectic' e®ec taut $ae betetpletstiots ?tad 000stractican of this Aggeemibt •, °::' ..: 'i'' ' 1 ' sbadl be govcteed by the laws of this *fate of , without mad to nub st:ta's .conflict of Lew' ' ; • prevision!. i Y J Wr NESS Wes, the parties hams have executed' this Agrocascta es of' the 4ay and d Yew ' • ' , i ! ' T a bo v e warn s ; r :". • CO11dtANY I; • OWl> &L h �� { • • Nantes ._.1),cc �.. Mayo: _ 7 --^�•: t o i ^. _'''' ' • • t5 0,Zr , Dam • >.- j .. r t , , .1 1, r 1. • • . . 1 • • II . -w.. • ,_^4 -M•.• Is . • , Si0'd 9925# iT :TT 200Z;OZ'VVwt . • Received: 3/13/02 9:37AM• -> Mericom Corp'. ; Page . 6 '' :. • • �' ' ;ROM :FIRST AMER I CRN TITLE S03 790 787 2 .03 - 09 s 09 872... R . X06 /06' • .. - --r- ..•mow _ - - • _ - - - -'-. —_ • . .- •— .. ;' ' �;v' ,�`' ' • —. t ,_._ i1. tti.=n..�Ji M$D .... .rl.a..«.1_ ate.•.. __ '3 : :� 7 (l mom MO fail OM r • K NOW ALL !' fBN BY 'H ass n s wrs. }hat l�sri �cY... !A_■_ aa;vi t taean_ r1. I l o survivorship - ef Marie s: Miller [also � known as sacra a_ lioui ' . a�iv�n�eyl duets, • • f • • 1 or r a» d refion Aetainakae .rural, dew hereby gnat, bargain. soil amd convey vnto.A_A %f L� r.5_4E_ ' • ' Trolr9a,.ai}. to -• tbe 9R}CCanor,Tsustee - p the, 0oetoariq„?.aesY Revo�abls ktiiin�. sate..._ _._. :: • , • • I A.reftw ter called grantee, and unto gtwntee'a.lmf i .aooa.srp and assigns LR of that cartdn teal pfoperiy seith the • 1 • , °Co o ' • . 1 tenem ant% laaditarnmete and apataf.aenow tfentanto belonged or Lo ewe's wfaa appoftaiNlw tuatad In dl. t y► . ' i ` • . I d., lis7lh {grbt► .,.. State o described a fol lows. tawik I " ' 1 : +' • _ 141 of Lot 37, Korth %%gardville Addition. in the County of Ilaehingten to • ' ;, • .' . • ' . af' n e xce tia therefrom 16.5 feet en the'twat and.be twit h'r ,`' ;i . ,',4 ;•' 90 . P 4 iwJ Parallel vibb'ret, : x ; - : :{ '. ,,a',;y. . 38, North Tigardville Addition: also asserting tlwrifrom. tbae pertiun convoyed • *� to the State of Oregon foc highway purposes by Deed 333- page 604. ; ;, . 1 : ;; • • • om .... - . : ? `W • • •I • ... ' y''' • ',∎ 4,:, :`•' 1 1 • Aqr dement daead April 26, 19 ,.• `, -. :i } • • _� i ( I • • � 1 To flew sad to Hold the Mae u nto f acrd a and ran .110 1 au i aert and aagro fewer- •;a The fns awl actual consideration peddler fhb transfer. atst.d in i., t of dellan, f1. $...0..00:••- :• -_ - -. ' • •i ti • • 1 1 ! NW NaleeWda mtone(redkate glitiokAlrhe wow. bowm., holm Orot .007citlRdread b.d.1.ndSwORSP,.o a). d. d•Y o/..0 - fir ' 1 In °crafting this deed and where Um anew ao requitea, the dniular includes the plural and all gram:naeiad. • • i cMnga Moil be implied to make the provisions lowed apply equally to corporations and td individual.. • ±3' : 1! Ir. Witness ktaol. the grantor has a.sgltad fhb iroMrcant this ,,,, .. 192.1. . ' ' .. ' d a camerae. g rantor, If has sawed its name to be sidnelri and he eased by an of other piton duly author- • i , is.d go do w by ord.: of Its heard al directors. _ .' } '�. : 'MS 04101011EM MAIN eu USE OP 1NE PROPERTY 06SCM DIN :NOS _ _ :ti I IN 10110E IaeteLANDM:AN MOREGMAIMA No a Emery OEM WOW Oil ACCIPT1d7)15 INE L N NAC UMINC i� • i�1 May ... ..... x • 't ' ;p h PUMING d�f 10 YEA APPROVED UM M O ID ownlm MY _ •r ;- a� , Urals ox uOVROM isUNSf F taeNG OA M EVPIALMS AS 011140 IN - - - -- -- -- ----------•-•" .... red J090a I K', ,:. ;."7"1 • .1 srwri OF Olt>:coIY, County et !!WHl- e°elw°" - • / ... ' i ' r : • =1 n This /,utnr .nt vas acknowledged before new an _• 1�iit arm. I,- 4 I ' ' 1� Ii b Rosemarie. EL '...� e .'SL._. ^ .• : ' _ .- • - - _-.•.. � r._ 1 `• ,"-1 !: b The. lneftument was acknowledged before me an -.. .- .- ..r.r --- -•r. /9 .._-., it ; r R\ •- r r•_w.,,- r•_ ww-rrr+�-w� «-red ww - -.- �. �' ' n ` ww••.•_••- .www.r•r« • w«wr•r•r-•.rw.r•ww...•r....w r••wr.rr.. ' -.-. • ' INVICE .1. YAMADA 1 - •.i.. { \ '� .IOTIIAY pLIC,IC • OAEOON_ 1 1 - • • 3 I� CAM MIb01�0N ItQ07910t dr y i 1• My co ' ttlr CALuailk N amen out - m +t91 N ot PubJ a Ion Oregon ! lon sap it e.._- .•_......•- .-...- �...:_._ _ I !',' • : ' - K. • • .rte .- lac.- ._.._.....«.••__. _ srwrl: OP ORgGON �. I I •1T1. , ' ; . • • 9)L 016 K : ' • • , 111.m46 4A -- - tam o ; t ' • 9 7520 County./ 1611 � 1a•: _ y� a.+' v7.7.47741.—"-"— I cerlJy fb a! the witkin Ins 1.0 • • ' RliI9tIROXIA..( MU .-_, -- r d ,. mad was received fur d on the -..i a rk 02.. --611 der 19-� • . Ast13t104«J11L— 4752D ,, sea *1.a -... ae «•-----r o'clock -.M„ and recorded •! a1....V are ..raar.■ roe. 1st book /nd /vohmteNo on I: ; • • M1.......1ws f Pr.1•. eft.* MI6 1ICaae.p vw pegs or ' ■ . i Terence J. Yamada, Anderson i Yamada P "'•- r as I/Al. /imii ''' � %.- , • Tere 5th, Suite 1020 . C mane /r•awidC 0 • a o. ' t fin: ' . , " E�� « OA 9 and, 7201 -.- Record of at said hand a I! i• , . •`'• uewe tegmarl r ,_ . ! Minim sty Awed and maul of.. . I' •1��i <' , :' : • . ' 'Mahar; KIM end He Lim Xi ` m P`•~r+\.a�, Couafr alf re d ; • {f; ' . ' . 1367 - SW woaeu,6r0 day - �; � - Portland. OA a • • "`� 1I ' , tens na .' ' , .;. s aY _ _..Dsprtfq r;' :y' : • is • • - - - - - - --- - - — • • Site Plans • • • y • 1",4g U • �Z - R.3 , 0 C till" .E 8° �� a O: c 0< as E _� T* a � I , 4I,; t J / - u gg a. PT326-O , PORTLAND, OREGON ° PI OA � L] 6 gd N . z . . 0 �y, . ,.. m C C�( co 17 E 110 21 12955 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY vis N TIGARD OR 97224 c rzi c.,. .. • SaImonPCS .. = w F , CV O = _ CV . >. O a0 3 IU co l Z O I THIS PROJECT IS TO INSTALL A LOCAL PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN (SHEET DESCRIPTION REV. O ( (PCS) SITE WHICH WILL TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE RADIO SIGNALS AS PART ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDRIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS (O OF A REGIONAL PCS NETWORK FOR SALMON PCS, LLC 6 ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING W AUTHOS. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS G1.0 TITLE 1 11x17 DRAWINGS N TO BE CONSTRUED P STRUED TO ERYR WORK NOT T C MG ONFORM TO THESE CODES. F PORTLAND THE MAIN COMPONENTS ARE ARE 50� REDUCTIONS 1. OREGON STATE STRUCTURAL SPECIALTY CODE 1998 G2.0 GENERAL NOTES. LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS 1 Q.. () ANTENNAS. MOUNTED AT 59' (CL) ON 5' DAVIT ARMS ON AN EXISTING 6 Me 78' HIGH MONOPOLE 2. ANSI /EIA -222 -F UFE SAFETY CODE NFPA- 101 -1990 • � SITE �ST9VBI Y. K.PLpWNt 6 0) (2) INITIAL EOUIPUENT CABINETS (3) FUTURE CONTAINED WITHIN A -- • — EXIST ATC FENCED LEASE AREA 3. NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE 1998 C1,0 TOPOGRAPHIC SITE SURVEY o a Cl • N i PROJECT DESCRIPTION CODE COMPLIANCE ti, � WINO, SICK. o) — — 1 T O F ORS D TIGARD A1.0 DUSTING CONDITIONS/ VICINITY MAP 1 N SW GAARDE ST SW MCDONALD ST. I APPLICANT / LESSEE: I ARCHITECT: PRIMARY A1.1 SITE DEVELOPS/DC PUN 1 GAZLEY • o 1 ON S. LLC GAZLEY � WIAAN ARC CONTACT: A1.2 PLOWMAN 123 NE 3RD AVE.. SURE 240 2701 NW VA•JGHN. SUITE 764 E SBE PLAN, EOUIPIIENi PLAN DETAR 1 2701 NW Vaughn AC7 O SW BULL OUNTNN �• PORTLAND, OR 97232 PORTLAND. OR 97210 MERICOM CORPORATION, SUITE E CONTACT: DEAN HOOUE 25977 SW CANYON CREEK RD. A2.0 ELEVATIONS 1 Sulu 764 • Penland. Or. 97210 PHONE: (503) 274 -7800 x 237 PORTLAND. OR. 97232 50.12747800 _ece r FAIL• (503) 274 -7803 CONTACT: ED FOURNIER A2.1 ELEVATIONS 1 103274 7803 Far (503) DATE: 5117102 FAX: (503) 303 -3001 - CV KING CITY SURVEYOR: ZONING: REVISIONS e l PROPERTY INFORMATION: MACKAY & SPOSITO MERICOM CORPORATION, SUTTEE REV.: DATE DESCRIPTION: BY: 25977 SW CL OWNER: MARA HYLTON 1703 MAIN ST. VANCOUVER. WA 98660 PORTLAND. CANYON CREEK RD. OR. 97232 (D DURHAM ADDRESS: 6802 SOUTH 220TH STREET CONTACT: MIKE)) NE (503) COONEY CONTACT: ' ED FOURNIER fN KENT. WA 98032 FAX: ( (350) 695 -0833 FAX: (503) 303 -3001 0 PHONE: E ( 25151 5460 CONSTRUCTION O AREA OF CONSTRUCTION: 162 SO. R. MANAGER: - ISSUED FOR 5/2 ZONING PERMIT TT 0 SW CANYO N CREEK RD. STE E //�'' \�� J Q 5/17/02 zONIN C REVIEW PR 25977 VICINITY MAP CURRENT ZONING: cc (GENERAL COCOMMERCIAL) YBLSO1ry�yE. OR, 9 7070 - RECEIVED C SITE No. '� ZONING APPUCATION /: ANT: (503) 303-x, C V ` 1— AP.N.: 25- 10 -2bd -02600 PT326 -04 ADA REQUIREMENTS: FACILITY /. , j HUMAN HABITATION. - � LITY 6 UNMANNED AND NOT FOR 129 I FROM PORTLAND. PROCEED SOUTH ON 1 -5 TO 99W / TIGARD EXIT. PROCEED ACCESS NOT REQUIRED 55 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY HANDICAPPED ID ^I� OF T1GAR D 12 95RD, OR U) THE UGHTED INTERSECTION FOR WTTH WALNUT AVENUE. THERE IS A SNAI LYSTRIP R • G ETAL V �I CENTER ON THE RIGHT. THE POLE 5 BEHIND THIS CENTER IN THE REAR PARKING N 97224 - (e . ni TITLE SHEET D DRIVING DIRECTIONS — PROJECT SUMMARY — PROJECT TEAM — SHEET INDE — n . rt U V V N JOB No. 02 - 072 • • • O GENERAL NOTES ABBREVIATIONS LEGEND 1 ,1P � - �� =a � 0 1 1 AU. ° i 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY A DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON SITE. SYMBOLS G S SYMBOLS 0 �- �+ < 2. CONTRACTOR IS NOT TO OBTAIN DIMENSIONS THROUGH MEASUREMENT OF THESE SCALED DRAWINGS. USE < ANGLE GA GAUGE 580 SUPPUED BY OWNER C ONLY THE DIMENSIONS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS. SHOULD ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS BE REQUIRED, 0 AT GALV GALVANIZED SC SOUR CORE DETAIL No. U < (ti CONTACT THE ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION. 0 DIAMETER or ROUND GB GYPSUM BOARD SCHED SCHEDULE Mk DETAIL ROOM NAME ROOM NAME E 1 PERPENDICULAR GSX GYPSUM BOARD SECT SECTION REFERENCE 10000) ROOM NUMBER E }, BEFORE ORDERING ANY MATERIAL OR DOING ANY WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY IN THE FIELD ALL 1 POUND or NUMBER (TYPE "X) SHG SHEATHING SHEET No. - DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR CONNECTIONS TO, OR INSTALLATION IN EXISTING / - PER or OVER GFI GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT SHT SHEET O STRUCTURES, AND FOR MODIFICATIONS INSIDE EXISTING STRUCTURE, AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE 14 CENTER UNE INTERRUPTER SW SIMILAR 0 r -0• MARKER d .1 CL 2, GRAD GROUND EE Q S � ^. PLATE GLB GLUE LAMINATED BE SPEC SPECIFICATIONS a BUILDING A.F.F. B I $$ CORRECTNESS OF THE SAM SO SQUARE SECTION $ >- - 4. ALL WORK PERFORMED AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPUCABLE A GPS GLOBAL POSITIONING SS STAINLESS STEEL ® 1000.0'1 FINISH O P£ a AA a O CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL S T STEEL N LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY BEARING ON THE AB ANCHOR BOLT GRD GRADE PEE AC MR CONDITIONING GYP GYPSUM STRUCT STRUCTURAL 441131L. - 000.0 EXISTING 0 . k 7 0 (� PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. ACCA ANTENNA GABLE - SUSP SUSPENDED WALL SECTION Ns. SPOT GRADE IF.; .. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQU COVER ASSEMBLY H SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. ACOUS ACOUSTICAL T DOOR ACT N AD AREA ACOUSTICAL HC HO 0 TILL HOSE LLOW CORE T TOP EXTERIOR 000 NUMBER r 6. PROVIDE ADEQUATE CLEARANCES BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURAL. MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL :. SYSTEMS. VERIFY PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OF EQUIPMENT WITH AVAILABLE SPACE AND A A.F.F. ABOVE FINISH LADE HDW HARDWOOD T G TONGUE AND GROOVE ACCESS ROUTES A0.1 ADJUSTABLE HDR HARDER TEMP TEMPORARY ELEVATION I.: 0 WINDOW THROUGH CONCEALED SPACES. A.F.G. F.G. ABOVE FINISH GRADE HDWR HARDWARE E THK THICK Yr.!b7 TYPE C 7. DETAILS ARE INTENDED TO SHOW END RESULT OF DESIGN. MINOR MODIFICATIONS M AY BE REQUIRED TO AGAR AGGREGATE HAT HEIGHT THRESH THRESHOLD O AG.L ABOVE GROUND LEVEL HM HOLLOW METAL T.OA TOP OF ANTENNA SUIT JOB DIMENSIONS OR CONDITIONS, AND SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE 0 _ KEY ALUM ALUMINUM HORIZ HORIZONTAL T.O.C. TOP OF CONCRETE GRID UNE 1 O NOTE WORK. ANT ANTENNA HR HOUR T.O.F. TOP OF FOUNDATION H- 4.... APROX APPROXIMATE T.O.P. TOP OF PLATE Wµ1 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND ADJACENT ARCH ARCHITECTURAL 1 (PARAPET) O TYPE 2 CONSTRUCTION AND UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT OCCURRED DURING ASPH ASPHALT T.O.S. TOP OF STEEL G MATCH UNE O CONSTRUCTION TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PROJECT MANAGER. AWG AMERICAN WIRE IBC INSTALLED BY T.O.W. TOP OF WALL d GAUGE CONTRACTOR TYP TYPICAL O E Q) 9. PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2 -A OR 2 -A1OBC WITHIN 75 LBO INSTALLED BY OWNER WORK POINT C7 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. B ICGB ISOLATED COPPER U 1 9 - -- GROUND BUS L REVISION BD BOARD ID INSIDE DIAMETER UG UNDER GROUND O BRTUM BITUMINOUS IN. (') INCH(ES) UL UNDERWRITERS 0 c BLDG BUILDING INSTAL INSULATION LABORATORY 4120 w INTERIOR v 0 BLK BLOCK • • INT INTERIOR UNO UNLESS OTHERWISE 2 ELEVATION N BM G BLOCKING BEAM J NOTED 0 B.O.C. BOTTOM OF CURB V = N4 O BOT BOTTOM JT JOINT ! N N M BTS TRANSCEIVER SYSTEM K VEN VENEER 0 Z QD N BTWC BARE TINNED VERT VERTICAL EQUIPMENT C j K Gln COPPER WIRE KPL KICK PLATE V.I.F. VERIFY IN FIELD < 0 O B/U BACK UP CABINET L W Q NEW ANTENNA zz mom 3 c Ib. (/) POUND(S) w/ WITH 7 FIRE HYDRANT V3 z -1 2 CAB CABINET LB LAG BOLT WD WOOD CEM CF CEMENT COLUMN FACE LF. L UNEAR FEET LONG(TTUOINAL) W/O WP WITHOUT WATERPROOF n LIGHT STANDARD a O COP- CAST IN PLACE LT UGHT WT WEIGHT -0- ��, POLE CM CJ CONTROL JOINT YAM WOVEN WIRE MESH 1 CLR CLEARO M E POLE GUY WIRE C4 cMU CONCRETE MASONRY MA H TERN ARE 50% REDUCTIONS 11x1 DRAWINGS Lam) COL COLUMN AWL MAXIMUM I— CONC CONCRETE MECH MECHANICAL O. CONN CONNECTION MFG MANUFACTURER MATERIALS c�ED ? C CONST CONSTRUCTION 14H MANHOLE VST BVBI Y K R W O CENT CONTINUOUS MH MANHOL • C CSH CONCRETE SURFACE MW MINIMUM I =1 CONCRETE EARTH C HARDENER MISC MISCELLANEOUS a r.ax .--3 O CTR CENTER MO MASONRY OPENING CMU GRAVEL CTSK COUNTER SINK MID MOUNTED PQITINO, 01®GOI = MIL METAL =II C) 0 MUL MULLION ® BRICK I• -'. -: % -"1 SAND ..A o C�G� d PENNY (NAILS) N I• 1 GYPSUM WALLBOARD PLYWOOD OF Q DEPT DEPARTMENT NIC NOT IN CONTRACT V N DF DOUGLAS FIR No. (/) NUMBER Nn IMMUM mluml0L0 BAIT INSULATION .....- FINISH WOOD GAZLEY DIA DIAMETER NOM NOMINAL I's DIM DIMENSION NTS NOT TO SCALE RIGID INSULATION ��� WOO (CONT.) PLO IAN O I N DR DOOR gWL DETAIL 0 DOWEL ® STEEL 2 ARCHITECTS WOOD BLOCKI Pon1 761 OC ON CENTER r E 0 0 OUTSIDE DWAETER ® ALUMINUM EXISTING STRUCTURE 5033 Fax 97210 503 274 7800 9 EA EACH OPP OP DATE: 5/17/02 CO - ES EACH SIDE OS OUTSIDE CO EV EV/ EACH WAY EJ EXPANSION JOINT P REVISIONS il EL ELEVATION UNE TYPES REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: • ELEV ELEVATOR PCS PERSONAL d ELEC ELECTRICAL COMMUNICATIONS NEW WORK — as — ss — SANITARY SEWER O E EQUAL PPC PPC SERVICE - - DENOTATION WORK — SD — 5n — ST ORM SEWER CO CO - EQUIP EQUIPMENT CABINET - CENTERUNE — FD — FD — FLOOR DRAIN STN PR PAIR G PROPERTY / LEASE UNE — RD — 80 — ROOF DRAW II EX EX OCT EXTERIOR PRC PRIMARY RADIO CABINET - - — 0 P.S.F. POUNDS PER SQUARE BREAK UNE • O F P.S.L POUNDS PER SOUARE -- - EXISTING CONTOUR — GAS — CAS — GAS Qj 5/2 ZONING FOR TF FAB FABRICATION INCH N CON T O UR — . — . — WATER ISSUED FOR FACT FACTORY PT PRESSURE TREATED Q p 5/14/02 ZONING RENEW PR FB FLAT BAR PWD PLYWOOD — K. — K. — HOT WATER FD FLOOR DRAIN PWR POWER (CABINET) • SITE No. 0 M FON FOUNDATION PINS - PIGMENTED WOOD STAIN 0 0 0 EXISTING CHAIN UNK FENCE — C. — CW — COLD WATER - FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER - o�� EXISTING WOOD FENCE pT326 04 FEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER Q IZ - - CABINET — 0 — x — CHAIN UNK FENCE - A — A - ANTENNA COAX CABLE FF FINISH FLOOR 0T OUARRY TILE • — c — c — GROUND CD FIR FLOOR GRADE R OTT QUANTITY —P—P— POWER — GEN — GEN — GENERATOR 12955 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OR CO l �. -. _ F1.Dt1R FLUORESCENT F.O.C. FACE OF CONCRETE RAD _ — 1 — T — TELCO — E — E — ELECTRICAL CONDUIT 9722a RD RADNS' — Pat — Pal — POWER & TELCO _ — c — c — CONDUIT 1 F.O.F. FACE OF FINISH RD ROOF DRAIN .. F.O.M. FACE OF MASONRY REINF REINFORCED _ F.O.S. FACE OF STUD RED REQUIRED _ .. GENERAL NOTES F.O.W. FACE OF Wµ1 RO ROUGH OPENING — DNP — — OVERHEAD POWER 8 ABBREVIATIONS FP FIRE PROOF — — 0147 — — OVERHEAD TELCO FT FOOT or FEET FTG FOOTING • FURR FURRING • — ON — — OVERHEAD — — — G2• N JOB No. 02 -072 . • • •- 4 • VICINITY MAP ' 5 \ N OT TO SCALE N~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION — PARENT PROPERTY: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 4a P .O . CURRENT VESTING DEED, SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED UNDER DOCUMENT NO. IN ` u ,� s a 99014369. RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY. OREGON. \ TAX LOT 2600 \ Z _if ALL OF LOT 37, NORTH MGARDVILLE ADDITION, IN THE COUNTY O' WASHINGTON AND , IN ` 3 O' STATE OREGON EXCEPTING THEREFROM 18.5 FEET ON THE EAST AND BEING SECTION 2, T. 2 S., R. 1 W. \ FARM I Fl WITH LOT 38. NORTH TIGARDNLLE ADDITION, ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM , W.M. �. \.' F �= THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OREGON FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES BY WASHINGT COUNTY, OREGON DEED BOOK 333. PAGE 604. ■ U Q LEGAL DESCRIPTION — LEASE AREA: / \ 0 A PORTION OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED / ■ )8' • 0, RECORDED UNOER DOCUMENT NO. 99014369, RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY. Q71 /5 4' d _ OREGON BEING LOT 37 OF NORTH TIGARDVILLE ADDITION LYING IN THE NORTHWEST / ( \ N '%. W 0: >'A QUARTER OF SECTION 2. TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH. RANGE 1 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE / '/G_ Y!l 3 ■ a $ !Id! MERIDIAN. DESCRIBED AS FOLWS: O SS BEGINNING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG THE g SITE WARD I r. - NORTHWESTERLY UNE O" SAID PARCEL NORTH 1453'00• EAT 47.00 FEET: THENCE � ��/ NN„ \ , a .F.. ;.,y. LEAVING SAID UNE SOUTH 45117'00' EAST 15.82 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT O' ' / - \- y O BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 4512700" EAST 16.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH / \ A p- 4453'00" WEST 9.33 FEET: THENCE NORTH 450700" WEST 16.33 FEET: THENCE NORTH 44'53'00' AST 9.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT O' BEGINNING. / 7 / F ■ — ,_„ -a+- !O ' / / � -F� / / lb \ PROPERTY INFORMATI �` a \ OWNERS NAM MARA H YLTON '/' p� • { H q t- L 3 . OWNERS ADORES& 6802 SOUTH 220th STREET 'T Y 1�.}*,✓ ; � / N TH ARROW MIXES KENT. WA 98032 4 .`-1y s � 6 72 / NOT TO SCALE T .'� r �1r•� ■ \\>/( / \ 6' \ 97E ADDRESS: . WA 97224 4:,,;;;„,..,,,..„,.. SW PACIFIC HIp/WAY TIGAR O @"��+� \ \ TAR MUNICIPAL MUNICIPAL Y \ COUNTY: WASHINGTON RADICTION: OTT OF TIGARD / \ / / \ \ ■ JLI TO - ■ AS TAX LOT NUMBER 251W0280 2600 U / \ / °! l j •i NET AREA OF UNDERLYING PARCfl(Sk 0.87t ACRES � � C O �i / � NET AREA OF PROJECT AREA 120 SQUARE FEET F */ MO \ k y / / / \ TILE REPORT BY: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON C N / \ / TITLE REPORT DATE /ORDER NO.: MARCH 27. 2002 ORDER NO. 957135 0 j � �- TAX LOT IGAD \ lAA 3 E am \ TI \ / Qi �o // ` : - \ FEMA OD ZONE DESIGNATION R • y - r \ / NATIONAL FLOOD I NSU RA NCE PROGRAM u \ ! l• \ C 7 �._ _ - _ _ _ _ ,. /., \ COUNTY: FLOOD EFFECTIVE DATE MARCH 1. 1982 v- 2 .., _ - .;�;.: r3 -.:. . / .: -' ' COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 410276 0003 8 de - ' " - _ _ - - _ AMC Wl / , y ;; g \ FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATHXt 'C' AREAS OF MINIMAL FLOWING a - / > . , : H i " "m / / . \ 11x17 DRAWINGS � F ; 50% REDUCTIONS � ARE 50 E \y - _ - - DATA _ GEODETIC D � @•� _ - _ DATUM BASE AO B - _� � 0 ) J{ ;i _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ 1 '46'47.53' / _ _ - - _ 45 '36.01' LONGITUDE: 22 _ - - - UTT10E ZS I.ON O RT C •.' - - _ _ _ : - -_ - _ " _ � - - AK AT THE OF THE M ONOP (LATITUDE AN LONGITUDE ARE TAKEN E CENTER E 0.E / 1 � ��t'� - DE O lD r 0 , _ - f ' 1 - r 4 ' r - _ _ - - � r - $ M► ^ ... :..: ^ / . IM HN9fF V TI WA IN � A ON GPS OBR A ON O" H GTO I _ T A NAD 88 B D CL D Tnc "� - - - _ r� + ) 1'_: y `lmmy COUNTY CONTROL PANTS �`•1N tik .► y 4 p ....e . ' 1 , _ TQP O� MONQ r r� • �h - - ^ O� , .r - - - - - r — 7 84 A SL•• B�tO IIIC + a 2..,, +, r .r f 1 - - - ; _ - " - - _ - - BOTTOM Of ANTENNA MOUNT 1703 MAN STREET VA/COMER. WA 96660 � ,r 721 A0L "."7 r' ° ° . _ _ / NOTES PH. T36o1 695-301 FAX (360) POD PC nuo +,. .)" ,)r - _ _ _ _ _ / / 1. MAGNETIC NORTH DECUNATON O ' APPR07(1MATELY 15 FOR 7HE YEAR (5713) 2� -6726 M NOAA PROGRAM ON NO WEBS - - 2002. C OM BY USING THE THE / 002 PUTEO B 7E, • sec.• ., � • 1 ,j' r 1' ,1�. - -- _ - 49.6 TO1° or MOUNT *VALUES O' EARTH'S uAGNE1IC FIELD (VIIR90N 4.0); AND DOES NOT E' MAY 29, 2002 ' ' �. ,. t , _ - - _ _ ACCOUNT FOR ANY LOCAL VARIATION OR ANOMALY ic& r REVISIONS _ 7a.2 - " - - -- -. _ - /. - -: / REV; DATE - DESCRIPD01t BY: 2 CONVERSION BET7IEEN NAVO88 AND NGVD 1929 VERTICAL DATUM'S IS , W Z .: _ _ _ . '/ / t OBTAINED FROM CORPSCON VERSON 5.11.08. TO OBTAIN NGVD 1929 -,k :_ macaw , ,R 7 r • - _ _ .. ' r � / \; SUBTRACT 3.49' FROM THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON TI4S y y;'L`„i � ! `. .- - - C r / 4 / 3 . THIS SURVEY DOE NOT CONSniUTE A BOUNDARY SURVEY YAP. O' THE PARENT _ m° _ _• � � %� PARCEL. MONUMENTS OF RECORD WERE FOUND AND HELD FOR POSITION. z' * l _ _ , . / / \ THE BOUNDARY OF THE PARENT PARCEL IS DEPICTED FROM RECORD 3. =z „ - _ _ _ _ - - / .. / \ FOR U9NG FOUND uONUMENiS FOR CONTROL := ' . I „_ - - - - - - - / tT \ ��$ 1 , \ 4. TIE GINTILITY WTES EEN RESEARCHED. i .� . 1 ) - _ - _ _ _ - _ / a'\ THE CONTRACTOR LO110N OF EXIST SMALL G CO4TACT U THE FAC RESPECTIVE HAS UTILI B TY COMPANIES TO r _ _ _ O INFORMATION EXACT DEPTH OF BUR D BURIAL AN ` =` , _ 35- )!1/1 - __. _ " _ ' /_ / � � 4 HORRON LOCATION REGARDING OF UTILITY UNES PRDR TO CURIAL AND THE T +r - T _ `_ ',. •�( +, t l lJ - =L,'..:., _ � y"� �:; o- AI RVEYOR ASSUMES NO RESPON980JTY FOR THE OELWEATON OF 91CH -. �- "i s: c ; ` - / / lf/ D UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. NOR FOR THE E)ISTENCE OF BLARED OBJECTS SITE No. VimP ;% _ '.-. -' -.- ,, _ _ - / ,` MITCH ARE NOT SHORN ON TM5 PLAN r REGISTERED r x.,. _ - - .._Y -, PT326 -04 � BTAIN PROFESSIONAL 4 \. = / - 1 LAND SURVEYOR g ' / ' �` / • \ / 12955 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY ' /-t / / 0' LEGEND nGARD, OR 97224 ma \ `r ° /° TAX LOT 1601D / 1 - 1 ASPHALT PAVING • GATE POST \/ / I- 4.-:: CONCPF_TE PAVING ■ WATER YET3t 7.( o�, - / y / Z6)11 i ' \ \ / 0 UTDU1Y POLE PI POWER NETER O R E G O N TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY v!/ G/ _ - / Q Daum MONOPOLE 0 GAS LETER OCTOBER 17, 1975 / •m -m SPOT ELEVATION 092.77) RECOftp DISTANCE A. COONEY / / • FDIS40 1J0181ME1 4T 1052LS / — BASE o MONOPOLE AS NOTED ID 1.0 EXPIRES 12 -31 -03 ,,,,,,,,� MONOPOLE M AIRBORVIrAE 0 N� W� ILIC6 MA L TA11 Ab/XJr Sa_a m SQUARE CATCH BASIN STAMPED U.S TRAY. PT.' NT I9 SW MI 10 SCALE © STORM MANHOLE ELEVATION ■ 19319 ,GIB 140. 13473 Il l. , ;11 I • ill !i 1 , ' :. CO • ' • 1 EXISTING BUILDING ,II41 � $R ( s • •Y \ 'bp,. ! X 1 11 ;1 1 ' Z ill" / / � I l( ��I l / lit Or 0 • Q \ V` \ 11X1Il' I- C \ / . Si-, 0 < 3 / -J r ^ , 1 \ ADJACENT ZONING: L . S a it / \ / h f ZONE GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) / \ �, u �g 11;'1' ill' ^a El JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD ¢¢ >+ 1 1 / 11,, 'X;1, uo. N j C) s REDUCTIONS / 17 rill. ' l1 ,1 , / \ V 10 -- V ` ✓ ; 5)1 \ 1 li.'. 1; 1 1, z « �,. 1 u rllllr ADJACENT 1111 ZONE: R (RESIDENTIAL) : 1111' IU UPP / / L ......_./ �� 'lit' RESIDE r'111/„. 1 1;{ •J;11rX \ • • CN ' 1 1 11,, JURISDICTION CITY OF TIGARD j11. i, I� '711„ r 1 i' `• ,• 1 r1,, 1`1 1 i / \ • 1 1'11 1 1 1 l Il,hll 1, II 9114111 / C 11 1 .Ilj, l C 1111, x1 1111 / 11 1141„ EXISTING MARKET , j A IA M ONIN : 1 1 11 1 11' , CD 1 1 1X` / \ Ij 11 1 J \ 1'11 ZONE: GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ;' 11 11 1 111 '1 J`' 1 ' ' 11 1 / / 1/ , JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD j 11! ' 1 1 ( 1 1, 1 11 ; 1 l . 1 A REA = 1 , , ri 1 I l , 1, . C 4;1; 1, / 38,384 S0. FT. 7„ , 1 1(11, 11 `'It G 1!h EXISTING 11 , 'I`I; 1' 1 1 1 1 4 a 1 i APARTMENT 11 1 11 ? / / 11'' x 1 1 1 1` 11 EXISTING GAS 1 41. ; , > 0 „ 1ji ; • BUILDING , Ill \ / / \ Illj, . 1 11 1 / +il STATION 1 • Li) ;�Ili, !1 ,l, / \ iJ 1 ‘ `1 P h �H' � / \ ! l , , 1 1 / In p 1 1 `111 l' . \ 1 1', f'' % O • • . 1''711 i 1� 1 11 1 / / 1 0 \ 1 111 i lfl r //1 / L CV 11 I .Il �( TAX LOT N0. • IA. \ / = Q 1 C I � V JONING P \ O 1 111 I / ZONE: GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ' w m CV / '.' JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD \�} > K r 1; Ir / j \ � \ 4 \ E a O O di, l; 1111 ('/'( �[ o �` \4, . \ Zy �\ ADJACENT ZONING; . Z 1r / CI W 17 d 1 i ? i i iI / i I I 111,1' l J r r �.-. 1 , ` ,Ol 1. \ JURISDICTION: �) y gl d CC ZONE: GC O 1 1,1 41 . , ),� / ' ' CB 7 \ \ 111 /I ` - � // `, / �-. Q I 'hi d i ills F Si ASP : ) \ P ING LOT `'' / ^ CO vi 1/' C � \ °' ( y � \ / G , � I 11 x17 DRAWINGS CV 111 II' it X /(c.,:/% 4- e� , : MONOPOLE • p I ' \ / '� C� ji \ ARE 509: I 1 11 {, DUSTING 11 th r a V J / � ! m , / o \ / ' i, ) ,11 APARTMENT 9 EXISTING CB ill' t, I 4 I / 1111 j � ", PARKING 1 1 1 • 1• j1 BUILDING c... C cn a. 1 �, _ C 111 i ii • J i ' 1 • � ry - • i ' q, NI C1yT8pBi Y. N.rLaWuncn C h ill l l h �1r/ L `' 4 • 1 1 1 11 ' C 1 , ' `� 1 1, I �'o \ \� / r ,) I aoRTLUO. almlall 111 1' i ' 1 � S ?• ; I 1 ? C O 1'1 , j1 1 ,,� 1 � ` �- S ;••° .SS C , { . 0 l l J1 l j` l; 4 \ \ I / _ �+ \ -�� 4 OF 1 !' 3 \ 1 11 x 1 1 i �1 . / / ' , t is SJ J '1 y f1' 1l I \ / ' \ , r � � , • 0 \ 11 i ) ' 1 l ' ` r j ! ' I (c C �}i 1 Y % GAZIEY 1 ' 7^ �` ! i i 1 t 1 \�:J ,C". PLOWMAN p \ 4.` ' EXIST C • , • Il 1 1 , 1,1 / / ARCHITECTS , r C TELECOMMUNI •NS ..� p I , ASPHALT I I EXISTING 1 PA RKING IOT C \ Suite 764 0.. 37210 CV \ . y L S rfE r ;i ` z7oX NW Vaughn O J 1 �,�"" \ \' • 111 CO ;% , \ • ...i / 4 i 1 ,, REPLACE (2) REMOVED / ` C BUILDING I' ,y ` \� c ) A 303 274 MOO a"• ARBORVITAE �j: N, \ P CY \ e 503274 7807 Fax O r '' '' c, C y.9 11 rr \\ 4 \ /J�'� DATE 5/17/02 , ',., = �' % \ /` � � \ < k REVISIONS / , , 1 111 x 11 1 11 , ct ? / k -' ^ , S � L � i 1 1 , i 1J'i1� y n P REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: ASPHALT KING �\1 ' 1 • ,t, I l 11 1 $ ` J \ \ �q � �`C /� v C . PARKING LOT � CV / c c__, r ".." .., ,i' \ 1 } F- - • / F , C +.. + C `� vt ADJACENT 7 Iyr Cl - / \_ L F w ' �, , �" ' ( \ ,�v / ZONE GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ISSUED FOR ES / `G ) ADJACENT ZONING: / � ` \ \ � JURISDICTION: CRY OF TIGARD Qj 5/28/02 ZONING PERMIT / JJURISDICTION C OF TIGARED �) "/7" / / SITE No. FL / OF \ / C C C PROPOSED RD (RE /_ / PT326 -04 \<< a / POWER AND TELCO �\ x - CD BUCKET I STIG RA LITY POLE W/ ' `�� TIGARD, OR CIFIC HIGHWAY � � - -- AND TELCO POLE 5175 - TN , 97224 a / I M 17.8 OVERALL SITE PLAN , � MI/ z � / 1.0 . // // A N EXISTING CONDITIONS/ VICINITY MAP . ° SCALE 1 JOB No. 02072 < • , ' • BUILDING di .1 cc ilelk- • / \ �� 4,1 (fi G Z � ✓ \ / ASF� �9� �(�!1, ,1 `tea r _ \ ^' `�` '(I�j Ii111 0 — is co • Q / 38.364 50 . F T . \ , ✓� ` Ill lllij ll r u \ �Vljl r , 4 �'�� / \ / ii ADJACENT ZONI • L" 0. $ l 7 r ZONE: GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) @ d / 1 l1 i 1'11`!i ,1il JURSDICTI CRY OF TIGARD WCC uE� >, 1 i \ / . 11'1 i1 O 6 E W 7 \ \ 1 1, Ey ivy L dill LC \f � 1/ T , \ il l 11.11 / in.-K1 \- 1 rl i ADJACENT ZONING; i L• E •� w 11!. '4111/, ZONE R (RESIDENTIAL) 1 l � I f l , /,1 !, 1, C• ``/� 14 jllf' . JURISDICTION: CRY OF TIGARD I 'tII ' fj 1 / \ j l , 1 il' '„1 '1( / 'filth ' 1 \ \ a li , 1 , , 'Iliil I , iti' EXISTING MARKET 'ti; 1, / • • 0) . 1111 11 v, / lttil 411 .1 i c njt , / ! \ ' 11!. 1 , , , AD1ACO1T ZONING j'!i /i \ 0) 1111 '11, / I t r, I l i •' ZONE GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) lij '.11!,• \ 1 ii , , . , '/1, ,ll \ � 1 11''11,, JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD 1 '1/1j, rt+ I ' • '1 1 / \ 1 jf. . I l f l ' 1 1 ".l, • • C Ilii 111 I 111i, 1) 1 / ' , j 11 � ' i j jl , G j" 1 , EXISTING 14 r 1'Ir 11f gil a APARTMENT . ( III / '10, ii//,/ rl•I' 1 .1 EXISTING GAS rl ' l BUILDING / j i ' / ` Nip 1, 1 / I / 1' STATION / r1j �j, . rlli• I p \ 111j O ' j \ \ . iil .il, . jr / >// OdAk • ii11 1 � (1I /1jib 1 ' • X 0 0/ \ ) j 1 , Ifi O jllir, .1 '1 � / j 1 .� \ 11 11 1 1' 1 1 / ° O • ilia 1 ? Y O 1 Is dill IL - It I ' \ ? \ t r / I- N PROP OSED 16' - X 9' -4 ' 1 il' r 1 1 1 . J TAX LOT NO. B• • 0 0 SALMON LEASE I LEASE AREA WITHIN Ill /' 1 i• � ACRES: - / = H N A N EXISTING LEASE AREA 112 1 11 / \N„ / �a (V 1' I l i' 2 CT / �\ 70NING O j 1 111 / ZONE GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) \ z O° LV / \\ JURISDICTION: CTIY OF TIGARD \ ry \ E L' O 0 i l ll ,,,m„, '1 '!llj r _ o Q'� \,,,,, \ — 20 ■ Il ! I y. �y' 3 j'I 1 111 11( \ j / / \ � PT' ON F GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) Z EL . t • 1 •1111, r `\ •[- ` ` 3 q . \ JU RISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD .-O 1 'Ij � > > � \ Q rl1l 11r j ' 'a ` � 4�.. �� A /1LSP C:<.- CB . �� /� / ,� 1 jl 1 11 1 \ P - INC LOT � �,' \ ^� III (' ,)) 1 1 x 17 DRAWINGS N 1 . 1 1 t 1 • 1 �,1 r jia � .. / ,.9 \ ti , C „ 111 / ♦.: v , \ I \ \ / , Q 1 ARE 50% REDUCTIONS � ♦ �' I OF ACCESS I PROPOSED ROUTE \ , y1 1 111, ,i /', a s � �/ / EX - G ! ' �, / 1 ' �IArnRTNMFM 1 ^ 1 � �� - P , KING ` :B 1(I- ''r, ')4110P‘ 6 1 / � � �--, 10'1) '•C • 11 1 1 11 BUILDING 'ii tl ill y` 1 * .. 4 . 1 I ‘,.......-_,..3, c r r - \ 3 ` e� � 1 . 11 "% ` , \ 1' L _ I. r.2 5T0VB1 NN n C ' I i'r dpi r -1 f- — A c'. l x ..-3 N i, b 111111 �/ , V �J / I ti 1 ' Ill ' � y0 \ \ t''' \ � � POLTUVO. aR8CJ1N N I' 11 - { t /� .. 4 piri , 1 1; J o 1 / ��t.y 9 � , ��i 3 Ill lr, t 11 i 1 Gtr , `` ,.r t.a ( i . / l \ ii \ \ / �` �'� �' OF � � 0 \ 1111' /,,.ems ' \/ ill! ,ll I 1 C , ' �) • N 1j rl r �r� �� l ' ,1 — ; � \ GAZLEY O \ 4 1 ' ' : REPLACE (2) ` ► . 111 f l I .1; \ \ 1 / PLOWMAN I ■ ' y �' REMOVE • ^` a ,. . 1 , ASPHALT / v ARCHITECTS CV / 2701 AIN V® O ` � ARBORVITAE / \ . '''1111 CCOI •'1 PARKING LOT C Suuc 764 t 1 ( ' 13 L. ` BUILDING Q � \ �1 _(� 5 97210 • r — Y J ) ( 11, 1' �' O C � Vr 503 274 7803 Fax l / 6 r . �:, L r 1 1j I '' \ / ti y ` \ � \ G DATE 5117!02 11 1 c. REVISIONS • c? C .:` C . 1 il l'11;111,1111,11,1',-,'I' 1 •1. 1j \ d� Q / (• l • ASPHALT ^ 11 it I li'/ r �1' n ". REV.: DATE DESCRIPTION: BY II / r c ' A PARKING LOT ! ' li . ',11111 \q O C''' ' i y , � ) \ .11 ,, l i'. t \ /�/ L I Ni • fh / / r,r.,..`" t 1, / �' ' • N ,111 . - , �:�i �/ • ' AIUACFNT ZONING; er O ` Y ) ` \ \ , �v ZONE: GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ISSUED FOR O ` ) ADJACENT ZONING v � ` \ JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD ,, 5/26/02 ZONING PERMIT IF 1. / ZONE CC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) 71-1-_,:-' ' d s'a� - a c�� ) JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD ',. / Q 5/17/c ISSUED FOR T 0 / ZONNG REVIEW 1 r // J ' J, , ' - ` - SITE No. El , Y A / PROPO D . A / / PT326 -04 POWER AND TELCO m Ewrnl+c LJTILfTY POLE w/ 12955 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY BUCKET TRANSFORMER TIGARD, OR I- ) AND TELCO POLE / S175 / TN MN 97224 s</,, d / ,.17.8 OVERALL SITE PLAN cc / . . . %F .� / / • . A 1.1 N SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN • SCALE r • 10,:7.0' 1 JOB No. 02 ��, ` I t ; i f / 15' -0• 1) 1 111] / r " I li l! , W I / //\ in 1- a C 1 1 ' �! E XIST. BURDING l r �� ' i 1 r / i - - O • • • • .i. I ' - co �' N Q � ' III/ 1I ' / 1 (FUTURE) (INITIAL) I 1 / / \ / 1 SERVICE 2 SERVICE 1 BASE EXTENSION 1 I EXTENSION 2 1 P I I (INITIAL) (FUTURE) 1 (FUTURE) A _ • 1 0 \ .ri [E i.„ s O ' /,Ii'i' / .-' \ POWER STUB L F " \ \ ® / DSCAPE r .s., TO REMAIN m TI ♦I 11 V K ^ i ° =�a TO y1 � 1.., IN SERVICE' `�-O �� �� zR's �-. �3 9 -- � ^ WITH CONDUIT Q • (\j O e---, / I ® \ AND TELCO DIAGRAMS) . l(�� ' \ J , A ), 0 \ ® SLUE: ' • C 1 �'` / tl/ 1 / / \ CABINET MANUFACTURERS 1 t / J 1 f WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS 03 1 0 ` , 1 /‘ . Id EW :15 OUI ONCRETE PHEW ON \ to / u i t E.°. ) ry� ` (' � : B' 1 I Y 0 - 4-4 /"' ��� �`� SLAB ON RADE ./ / \ l � ''� CON IN D UIT TO CABINETS TO BE INSTALLED , NEW COAX 4' - 1 2 4' - 1 2' PER MAN UFACTURERS WRITTEN CO ) J ( I ' BRIDGE TO EX'+ / 6 / STRUCTIONS. SEE ALSO ELECTRICAL `( _/ / PORTHOLE \ 4 CO � ! t, 1 -- / ( )) NG 7B' HIGH STEEL , O 1 h ` ✓ /- /fY ...- •--�` MO POLE W/ SALMON PCs CA \ / ��--'' ! qda 0 59' CL v p ' - I `� 1 L : `-•; /♦ , \ SALMON H -FRAME EQUIPMENT LAYOUT scALE 2 �' W N MST. BUILDING r \( / trz.t•d • CT ./. •� ^ EXISTING 33'x34' / 1 q: k; " ? . % ` EQUIP. AREA W N wi EXISTING 7 -0 HIGH CHAIN O Z a" c� 1 . �J `J y: Y ; ,.' • �• w ' % ' `.' ,_ LINK FENCE W/ 3 STRANDS > K / PROPOSES r s•- �"X AA it _ \ « \ OF BARBED WIRE 2' -4• 2• -4' 2' -4• 2' -4• 2' -4• Q O SIDE OF MQNOVO � ^� �� i 1 G O \ ..._ FU M . �• i 1 ELO PMENi BURD II5TING `v Z i 3 :y , 1 I l ( ® �� c.; 4/ 1 I / oISTING / / \` r - - - r - - - I r - - -, 11x17 DRAWINGS N i 1 \ ��I 4 / /,./;;: � ( I I I 1 1 1 I ARE 50% REDUCTIONS co /yam / / \ J , // ;/ / �� ; I I 1 I I I 1 II %"' / \/ ` \ a- ;� / 4Y EXISTING '1'4' L - - -J • %) I PARKING LOT • I B75 �V � � �•C r` • \* s i \\ / V ACCESS GATE EXISTING AC PAVED L 1 L ,� \ • • 7 SERVICE2 SERVICE BASE EXTENSION 1 EXTENSION • PUNTH �� � C //y --�� ✓ � � ^ � � / v /e�� Dpp 2 CONDOR w/ 1 e (FUTURE) (INITIAL) (INRVLL) (FUTURE) I (FUTURE) ASSEMBLY CD Y. M.RQWN n / \` � g" ' t. ; • 24 SWEEPS ' / , � EQUIPMENT [C --3 1 N , - F \.___> ^ ` \ - _ -- - W 6 � O •` ' T EXISnE DSCAPE ,' I SLAB �,�FaRTLAro. af®Ga = C � ) ` c J D • • ) \ • 0 . `, � � / .. UNDERGROUND L - - - -J- L---- JAL - - - - J 9T' OF Q�V ` J, ' ) 1 , , / '' PO R & TELCO ROUTE TO 4 `��� � � 1 .I I EX1 UTILITY BOARD + • • • N `"� /■J v ... ' �' PROPO GIN EEN 1.--4 GAZLEY C ;� U� ��` I FOR TEL �• `I r AME PLOWMAN r .� v ARCHITECTS CT . '' '• � \ / � � PROPOSED W '- p , GALv. EQUIPMENT ELEVATION (LOOKING WEST) 3 5 Vaughn 10 1 POST 1 1 ?.,•4' 503 274 7800 ■ ° 1 , 503 274 7803 Far Or ` I ' REMOVED ARBORVITAE R TELCO 1I( DATE 5/17/02 / J, REPLACE (2) ` n H -FRAME REQ. BY Taco REVISIONS N �G• ARBORVD • �/ / PROVIDER t � _ 1 '•1•(i. ARBORVITAE (` \ � 1 1 \ REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: 11 a � , -1..e. J / I , PROBED 4' -0• VERRON TELCO \ 2• -2• -I— N ] � � \ l 4 CONDUIT '' I w/ MIN. 30 SWEEPS l i • ( w'0. / J 1. ,i '\ \ _ n v I 1 B. ) 1 I ` WORK a 4.E- \ I . / r r i 1 r UGHT ..—+ 5 SUED FOR 6 \ ° , i © / 28 02 I ZONING PERMIT IF 0 r ' ' ISS UED R * ' 0 ■ ` } < 1 ®' .t. FOR L2 5/17/02 ZONING REVIEW IT C © / ..... I f 1 ur SITE No. ® 1 J � \ I,; BACKBOARD BASE PT326 -04 a l- �� • —' BUILD LNG EXISTING BuLLNG PLINTH • u� UT / ASSEMBLY • I m / (-' \ , 1 D 12955 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY ` r l _ � ; r ! CONCRETE Ise E Ertl T D. OR � � I \ I ♦` \�II1 lsa a r • ♦ / 1 r ' ° r EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS ( I TN Y ` �.r' ii N g Er- 1 - D VERIFY LOCATION OF t �; • POSTING UTILITIES 1 ' B EFORE YO DIG I„ y : `�, . Al .2 Ni ENLARGED SITE PLAN s `A`E 1 EQUIPMENT ELEVATION (LOOKING SOUTH) :a 4 JOB No. 02 -072 to I • • aR «+ E - 0 !II" L Q — u a5 1 F" co 0 E Ec O Et a i,4: o WQ LgEL§ N .O ix9a 0 co �k, .1. N a) C 2 a. T .., i ii fird1 an 2 O I� r1 I+. t 1 O I I ■ I` a tv o \ ` 0 z� CV z 0 y t _ W ad 0 LI. ill , j _ I TOP OF MONOPOL �� C CA ._ d O \ ( IXSTING ANTENNAS j i / / \ IXISTING ANTENNAS , / L ; I / S'' ,, 6 / \ // ARE R DUCTIONS N (` 777 C7) a N M \ � _ i � \ STBVBI Y. M. RW1N t� • \ PROPOSED SALMON PCS PROPOSED SALMON PCS , C>: y C V l GENIE RUNE OF ANTENNAS ANTENNAS. 0 59' CC.L. ON 5' i , N / i ,k '1 DAVIT ARM MOUHTSC.L ON 5 , ' _ R — _ _ _ — _ i _ DAVU A RM MOUNTS / /J /I \\\\ , t fs�POiRAN). ORBCDI O I ` .. \ (2) PROPOSED COAX PORTS x • 1 \ / \ ` 7 /k\ Q�' OO co CI i \( �NMES BELCH C.L. SEE n • \ / j c % - N L ` EXISTING 78 MONOPOLE I � ^ ` EXISTING 78 MONOPOLE i < ' \ ' / , \ / GAZLEY O I i!> (\ i ( -7 t �� \ �! �� . PLOWMAN RC L' J ) / 1 f s � ^ 1 Y�j / J ` t ARCHITECTS ISTING AEN � ' IXISTING ANTEN WlS - - - - -- - — L ' I S t ! �_ / f y ` \ \ \ \( \ — ` 0., / L �� Y A \ DATE: 5/17/02 N ` ? /• ^ EXISTING BUILDING BEYOND / \ !• \ I ,? M K j A REV.: DA7 8Y : Q, EXISTING COAX CABLE BRIDGE DGE , \ / ` / ( ° < "I / . ca / I. ) , L i \ tom.1 \ , ti N /,{ V - C NEW CABLE BRIDGE //� / t { N I , f''' Y / ` / / (I I ! L ' \ COAX TO ENTER EXISTING /VP ` • � ,v \ ` COAX T ENTER EXISTING, Nt� ' 1— Y ti (mss L 1 \ PORT AND RUN ALO / Y (� 5 1- D( UNG EQUIPMEM \ INSIDE OF MONOPOLE I t p COSTING EQUIPMENT SHELT ; A \ W t ` \ INSIDE AND MONOPOLE `\ O PROFUSm METER DN � PROPOSED SAIIION , d \ V \ 7 t 4 `.�� ��, PROPO SALVO ` � ZON Tr O A GALVANIZED POST I V COAX CABLE BRIDGE I ` t� / 1 . , , 1 EQUIP SED ON A 1 SSUED G FOR FOR PERMR /jq µ /t. ' // I t 1 V l\ 1 5 1. Qp 5/t7�02 ZONMG REVIEW ! !I I!I I I 1%11' ' + r• PROPOSED PORTION OF `' N IA PRO POSED sALMO • j\.., / 1 ' LL \►,`` CONCRETE PAD � ` �y O EXISTING FENCE 70 BE 1 t , 1 ' \ E�O ON A © //), • 1� 99111 ` 1 �l v ` ! 1 I l \ © SITE No. I `" i V I L / • f PROPOSED SAU1 i M NOTCHED OUT FOR II t /I i i i tL Llnutt H -FRAME a �` , I PT326 -04 TELCO FRAME P� PPRO HE- -FRAME SALMON L If I� E + V r ` , i CL ( ''II PROPOSED 4' -0' WIDE I _ I i� - y VERIZON H —FRAME — (1 WAY CD iii — R _— — _ :_. 1 ! 12955 PAC IFIC HIGH a' 2955 SW ;rc:r .:ic: ??z. :: :.i; S � - e v:,. TIGARD O - x�R � S 4 y s s � s.y o y w >a 3 ✓ - 97224 CO 1— I I . '. s. r r / x� / 4 s,.....:3 I � ill ^ ",..16,":"„4.7:.,,, r Ei 1Z t: d zs S S x' ' � , :. 3 .i. k x Z.+ z y . x � s '�r< f l',AO � ¢ 3 � nT f ` i s i' . i 7 x.- S{ Jy i x : ik x i y £ i rt d t i y„ 2' s _ h ,� y � s. Y / ? _ ' + {.: ,�'�:,.� s s'i. _ k .r_ , :.vx I . . . : r :kx'w I y`* y . ✓ r _ T ....m......... :i - ELEVATIONS g , D Z A2. - U N SOUTHEAST ELEVATION . SCALE 2 ns NORTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE ns :t'� 3 JOB No. 02-072 I • • v, ' ' b - V 3s. •z : D 31 f's E. Q o F- u- c 0< (0 b a a .l 1 - 0 zOst.. N m C CO L 2 a 0 11 0 co iri 0 V N N O o— N F, CO � O W / E o L .o r Y/ ' 1 0 2i ‘ CI 2 5 — 1 n Y O. 0 i 1 \ � ' - _— • - ! EXISTING ANTENNAS 0 TOP OF MONOPOLE EXISTING ANTENNAS L + 6p J 1 1 1 4/ V i 1 11x17 DRAWINGS II CNI 1 \ \ 1 o Ake ARE 50% REDUCTIONS I I €� C ' ? � \ / ST9VB1 Y. N. PLOW n C PROPOSED SALMON PCS \ �� 1' m ANTENNAS. • 59' C.L ON YYY \ PROPOSED SALMO PCS - 1 CENTERLINE OF ANTENNAS 1 ANTENNAS. O 5S' C.L ON tJ �+T • aReCOI CL re 1 5' DAVIT ARM MOUNTS ] I _ — _ — _ _ _ _ _ — _ 1,\1,, / �� j i 5' DAVIT ARM MOUNTS rn t (2) PROPOSED COAX PORTS NEAR r \ N I \ I o a 59' ANTENNA C.L SEE NOTES BELOW • 7 (, } / \ \ ` 1 - .� a \ % j \ O EXISTING 78' MONOPOLE _ - _ 7 I ARCHITECTS LOWMAN + EXISTING 78 MONOPOLE ' PLOWMAN \ \ y C 0 EXISTING ANTENNAS � �\ 1 j } i s.1 7� 47210 ' O EXISTING ANTENNAS P ort 80 T... � k ` } \ 0 507 274 7803 Fm O — L t ��� I e i DATE: 5/17/02 N i c o i EXISTING BUILDING BEYOND 0 ' i , REVISIONS 1 0 ! BEYOND BUILDING REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: rts NEW CABLE BRIDGE EXISTING COAX CABLE BRIDGE \\` ` ∎� I- 4 \ (V COAX To ENTER EXISTING / + / ^, 1 PORT AND RUN ALONG I �^` +' 1I I INSIDE OF MONOPOLE i I L / \` �� 1 . � , . Q 0 SHELTER . 1 L' L ` y j 11L- i \,\ �` \1 f SHELTER 1 Z 55 U ED FOR TF a i CASTING EOUIPMENT 'J ` .( �1 `` j EXISTING EOUIPMENT 5/03/.2 ISSU D 0• PROPOSED SALMON 1 �. /N I �� ' ' 0 517/02 TF 1. EO T ON A CONCRETE I I • / / ,Ii , f, i 1 O CONCRE PA 1 ; 1, 1i n . 1' / /( I I \q I I EXSTING UTILIT'f BOARD 1 SITE No. �A 1j (\ ; ; I �` ' V € ' I I I i1 I PROPOSED FR I 1 , PT326 -04 Q. / l( "1 m I+ ` 12955 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY l TI R I 1 GARD O € ' — — 97224 i r ^ -.. � ...5> i:. : ,v:: w.- , ^ : ?5 r- :- i 6 rr :? c: j >:: . wi ? `: S?: :'::;X" :.. � o CL F,.=. x 7“ 3 ' i art 3 l c� ✓h v l i y .gr h .i t / ' • _ S`; , s n� y �„ f � ,A ( x s h x r s xc CC �. �� £I �. i s Y . , xy fi '� 4 � y Y y y ? .. .. yx k Fii i ELEVATIONS D Z A2 . 1 - U N NORTHWEST ELEVATION S ` E "` 1 1 = L SOUTHWEST ELEVATION SCALE 2 JOB No. 02 -072 l eff11,80 CITY OF TIGARD PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUR 96 -0009 FILE TITLE: AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE APPLICANT: W & H Pacific, Inc. OWNER: Estate of Rosemarie Emery Attn: Chris Eaton 1360 SW Woodward Way 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Portland, OR 97225 Beaverton, OR 97008 -7120 (503) 378 -2911 x229 (503) 626 -0455 Attn: David Kim (Son of trustee) REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 60 -foot tall monopole tower with antennae and equipment cabinet on an existing commercial site. LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 02BD, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General Commercial (C -G). The purpose of the C -G zoning district is to provide sites for a wide range of goods and services. Utilities are also permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.120, and 18.130. CIT: Central CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY STAFF DECISION DATE COMMENTS DUE: Monday November 18,1996 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30. X HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: 12/9/96 TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (503) 639 -4171 x317 CUP 96 -0009 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS -•- -+- -+- LAI11101SE APPLICATION FILE CONTEND -•- -•-� •- —•— sr I PRIMARY FILE NO.: CuPgi - 60O f SEE ALSO : Application Summary: Lil Approved: No. of Lots: 1 Commercial - IB9ts1 0 Denied: Lot Size(s): 0 Industrial (Date) No. of Phases: Gross Sq. Ft.: O Residential ... \ { :::;;.ia:i::`:ti:: �tiv:.v:22: \\:: + <.;::; 'v::;' {;;:: ::'n: \.a:,i,. ti '• ti•:o,. \r•\ `:a. \•:,.>'i< ..V:, vv: v::. .:: : :: :: ..... . :�:.:.�.. . 1:i.agh,‘„,,W;..„„ J i 4 SID .:1M0k:•',.e%:e :ZZt%.,,ktilek.411011SIIMEt4kiNnataik$iikkil: o PLANNING SECRETARIES MATERIALS: El "REQUEST FOR COMMENTS" RETURNED Mailing Labels O yj inity Map lD Site Plan i1f`/ewspaperAd: &O. /P.C. /C.C. ;.: .'. .:...:; ..•. ® Sarin Notice: 9 of ce: ./P CC Final !' a Order Cover er. lP. I C C. C. . I DLCD Notification(s) of Amendment: 0 SUBSEQUENT CORRESPONDENCE ❑ Proposed ❑Adopted ❑Withdrawn /Denied !( Includes All Communications Following Application Acceptance) "Request for Comments" Distribution List Q� WORKING COPY - ORIGINAL DECISIONATA NEWSPAPER AD - Affidavit of Publication: ❑ N/A WORKING 9OPY - PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE(S) ❑ Administrative i'H.O. ❑ P.C. ❑ C.C. g H.O. 0 P.C. ❑ C.C. ❑ ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION - Affidavit of Mailing WORKING 9OPY - FINAL ORDER(S) (As Applicable) Includes: Affidavit of MaiUng/Posting, Original Derision. & Copy of Mailing Labels. Qa H.O. ❑ P.C. ❑ C.C. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE - Affidavit of Mailing Includes: Affidavit of Mailing. Co of Public Hearing Notice (Original with ❑ WORKING COPY - RESOLUTION NO.: Meeting Minutes). & Copy of ling Labels. H.O. 0 P.C. ❑ C.C. ❑ WORKING COPY - ORDINANCE NO.: FINAL ORDER - Affidavit of Mailing TO CITY COUNCIL: Includes: Affidavit of Mailing/P q�g Coov of Final Order (Original with Meeting Minutes). & Copy of Mailing Lab�ts. 0 Forward for Review by the Planning Director H.O. ❑ P.C. ❑ C.C. 0 Council Call -Up for Review ❑ OTHER - Affidavit of Mailing t COPY OF MEETING MINUTES Includes: Afridavd of Mailing/Posting. Ordains( Decision. & Copy of Mailing Labels. TYPE: HEARING BODY: ❑ P.C. 0 C.C. TYPE: HEARING BODY: Coate) (Date) :::::::: APPEALED TO SSE ':: P.C. C.C. t (Date) e 1 0 DSUARMY CORPS. OF ENGINEERS PERMIT APPEALED TO LUBA: O OTHER: ❑ FROM P.C. ❑ FROM C.C. (Date) (Date) El AP SUBMITTAL ITEMS: LUBA REMAND• . r9 A pplication and Receipt for Payment of Fees Proposal/Summary of the Application 0 TO P.C. ❑ TO C.C. ,Correspondence with the Applicant Prior to Acceptance (Date) (Data) J Neighborhood Meeting Documents/Affidavits 11 of the Title Transfer Instrument/Warranty Deed 0 Traffic Impact Study(or) 0 See: file of _ 0 Wetlands Mitigation Plan(or) 0 See: file of 0 arrative (or) 0 See: file of 0 Maps (or) 0 See: file of 0 Tree PreservationiMitigation Plan and/or Arborist Report (or) 0 See: file of H:IPATT WASTERSICONTENTS.MST III 11111 08/23/96 18:22 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD a004 /009 - CITY OF TIGARD OREGON 6)..,iht10Ka iitsit. lei'rM.,'7 CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY • C.SE NO..: - C P q6 OTHER CASE NO'S: ky RECEIPT NO. / - Z f APPLICATION ACCEPTM BY: 4114 DATE: ID 1. Gr'TJEe.AL LVFORMATION Application elements submitted: P.OPEaTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 12925 SW Pacific Highway CA) application or (1) Tigard, OR 97223 1 1 L/ (B) Owner's signature /written TAX M A P AND T A X LOT NQ ,` _ ` uthorization d , _ _ 2S • ►D2D (/(C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE 1,600 square foot leased area of 0.87 ac. d1 /Q(D) Assessor's man (1) PROPERTY OWNER /DEED BOLD 1. Estate of Rosemarie Emery !" E) Plot plan (pre -app checklist) ADDRESS 1360. SW Woodward Way PHONE503- 378 -2911 Applicant's statement David " trim ext. 229 CITY Portland, OR 97225 tit (son of 'trustee) (pre-app checklist) APPtICANTy W &H Pacific, Inc. for AirTouch Cellular h 7(G) List of property owners and ADDRESS 8405 SW Nimbus Ave. •PEONE 503- 626 -0455 addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY Beaverton. OR ZIP _ 97008 -7120 - L Filing fee ($56e We DU ;When the owner and the applicant are different " (I) ConstrLction Cost estimate people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record ` or a Ieasee is possession with written authorization DATE D D TO BE COM2LZTE: from the oTamer or an agent of the owner with written /0/ R 4 authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PL I /ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY C -CI- The owners of record. of the subject property • request site development review approval to V _ e'K %✓1l, allow a 60 -foot tall cellular monopole tower Approv71.1 te: . with antennae and an equipment building on the ) - 2 6 I - PM7"a LAP Kim Upholstery 'site. Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering 0524P/13P ' Revd 5/87 08/23/96 18:23 0503 684 7297 Liii ur iilnitUJ . List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions co be considered as part of this application: . Applicants: To have a complete application you will need co submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application- . THE APPLICANT (S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject co all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application- Oar DATED this 0(54 day of ( / f' 'P L Q 19 1 IGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. Please See Authnrizatinn Tartar • ;KSL:pm /053 • • l ~. • AIMINIONIWOMok [II- - 1 I PACIFIC 1 4. : I PACIFIC TRANSMITTAL 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue (503) 626 -0455 •Planning •Surveying •Environmental Mar OR 97008 -7120 Fax (503) 526 -0775 •Engineering •Landscape Architecture Services ' To: I `a r lam/ w - l Date: 16 / f / I �(O CA U T ( J T, . Project Number: — 16 o - 0 '76 r Z 1�, / , j _ l � c- _ P at . Project Name: �--� yam _ 99 - ode , (IL 7 4L q7 W3 Regarding: PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY i AT (503) 626 -0455 IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS RECEIVING THIS TRANSMISSION We are Sending: These Are Transmitted: Copied To: ` Attached ' For Your Info /File -e(3 15)/f-et- 8?» ❑ Facsimile ❑ As Requested ro at_ (rd€uL - - Number of Pages Including Cover ❑ For Review And Comment ❑ ❑ Copies Description - �' D_wia � - - 2- 2 &1— /<4eCte' o- 5 _ - Comments -- ktoll — 0, / - - as s 6/44144 .e.. t- elh 0±e_c cAtaff xa_o_ k-- p-(Ain44-- P2)______A__ /1411 et a'- /_ 2-$ 5W P "hci a . IC 1 ofr taitive- cot (Ke&-/-e- ca- Si CA 2 3 I %2 ;/I f? 6 ! G l_// — • • THE MERIDIAN GROUP • Land Use Planning & Development Services • October 21, 1996 Penny Kim Kim Upholstery 12977 S.W. Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Proposed US WEST NewVector Group, Inc. Site Plan Dear Penny: Enclosed for your review and approval is a copy of the site plan for the proposed US WEST NewVector Group. Inc. cellular communication facility located on your property in Tigard. The site plan depicts all of the required improvements (a 12' x 20' equipment shelter and a 80 -foot tall monopole tower) located within the 35' x 35' leasehold area. Pursuant to the City of Tigard Zoning Code development standards, the required perimeter landscaping is proposed along the northwestern and southeastern portions of the fenced equipment enclosure. These perimeter landscaping strips are both approximately 5 -feet wide and are located outside of the leasehold area. US WEST NewVector Group, Inc. has requested that I obtain the owner's consent and approval for the attached site plan, including the perimeter landscaping, as depicted on Sheet L.1 of the enclosed site plan dated September 27, 1996. Could you please sign the authorization form at the bottom of this letter to indicate the owner's consent for the proposed required perimeter landscaping and return an original copy of this letter to me at your earliest convenience. Please feel free to call me at your convenience at (206) 633 -5659 if you have any questions regarding the enclosed site plan or this request. Sincerely, THE MERIDIAN GROUP rt /�- Owner's authorization: Date. Andrew T. King ATK/wp w. enclosures 4127 Meridian Avenue North • Seattle, WA 98103 • Tel (206) 633 -5659 • Fax (206) 633 -4985 • • R. Dols a <envllm. 1_v \ ® • -rows 0. b... for .e.. ow... .09 .. Q 6 -26 -n W.4........ IMO t o ... ® • -9 -1{ 6 .1.••••> c........4 KV \ e s -21 -96 Y.ce,y..vloo ,... ••■•I .69 • • f i " i I10iE$ • • l % i 3 V \ % ,gi ./ //?>\--. - - --- 4'7•` '' ` { l1 f i , ijl ,it!,1 ;.:il. y al lif ' i' �ii�'l l . � / -.- s. , ' `\ /''r;';ii..iuii!t1ir iirL 1I '` i I , X / t i ,�Y a ' s' 1 f- �' ii � :, ...: 1 !! ` I ii 11 i's \. \i' / _. (p r` 1 .1 : t' 1!':1! r r`jUCH !il IIII -- > _ :. .Q� r C 1 , 5 � K,� v' j :;i:licr'rr. -. r. -rp 1'I''jii'i,� � i e ' (E/ R_TA'IJi.NG t," x l i °� y,y; 1l' a!'1 tf !!;':i•;j''jlija if! lilI " ''y , \ \ W I.l i ' "� t, 1 ''71 • • ;t . I - ., ``'A • �ii iii;i. ; l•'il`j 1 t li ' ''� 1 ;i71j 11', ,? , \ / i' _.- r j •. .. r { 1J' 41, LANDSCAPING (t 375 S.F.) ili: ; 1,, : h i: , .! , ..'' (15) MED. -SIZE EVERGREEN TRANSWORI.D CONSORTIUM. INC. �" ''` SHRUBS, 5' -G DIAMETER AND HT. / �. , . , I ..l �.1 {t� 11''•7: I -.• q✓ / II./ _:,4: _; ;4z - - ,, :4' -- - _ ` , \ / / •= • Rhododendron 'Scintillation' - 5 got. 160 ® .<IR.<T, 919 60 636-09° _ / y.. 6R 91936 4a 696-0]6 -3163 / p .; lob 9.. • (DE Media 'Densi /ormis ' ^ `+�' .. /At (DENSIFORMIS YEW) - 5 gal. / `‘ • ' • Thuja occidegfalis - A I R T 0 U C H - • (AMERICAN ARBORVITAE) - 5 gal. Cellular • +,^, s 'C - ; / ; 1 • TIGARD /99 CELLULAR SITE SCALE 12925 s. aer 109.• -0 • '..`` i • 0 5 10 20 TIGARD, OREGON f 1 wmsr.:r.c PLAN .. • i <Y ; - - - In .. nc elsarn W.: uiw.cmc • ) SITE PLAN - I .... Ora) .RfOlt“ muw .Rata w. 7,1 saic: r.la rr vlor2ro Dv /1.n L 1 1 1 1 Application for a Conditional Use Permit 1 1 A Proposal Submitted to the City of Tigard 1 1 1 Prepared for: AirTouch Cellular 1 (Formerly USWest Cellular) 15575 SW Sequoia Parkway Portland, Oregon 97224 1 Prepared by: W&H Pacific 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, Oregon 97008 -7120 1 October 21, 1996 1 1 1 1111 4111 1 Table of Contents 1 I. INTRODUCTION 1 Background on Cellular Communications 1 Cellular Communications System Improvement 2 1 Frequency Emissions 2 Structural Characteristics 2 Proposed Cell Site 3 1 Construction and Post - Construction Activity 3 1 II. REQUESTED LAND USE REVIEWS 4 III. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION 4 IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA 4 Compliance With Community Development Code 5 1 Site Development Review 6 V. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CRITERIA (Code Section 18.130) 7 1 VI. CONCLUSION 9 U VII. EXHIBITS 10 A. Tigard Zoning Map B. Assessor's Quarter Section Map C. Site Plans D. Digital Photo Simulations (To be submitted under separate cover.) ' VIII. ATTACHMENTS 18 A. Authorization Letter from Property Owner (To be submitted under separate cover.) B. Letter of Support from Property Owner C. Pre - Application Conference Notes 1 • 1 1 1 • 4 AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site 1 Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 L INTRODUCTION AirTouch Cellular (formerly US West Cellular) is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval from the City of Tigard to install twelve panel and two dish cellular communications antennae on an 80 -foot monopole located at 12925 SW Pacific Highway. A 12 -foot wide by 20 -foot long by 10 -foot high utility structure would also be placed on the site. 111 Background on Cellular Communications AirTouch Cellular service began in 1985 on a limited basis (then under the name GTE Mobilnet). The • initial system consisted of five locations, and over the years since cellular service was licensed, has grown to approximately 90 sites in the region. As this region continues to grow, cellular communications offer a method of accommodating the increased need for communication in a wireless fashion. This need includes business communications, public safety (i.e., emergency response for police, fire, ambulance and 911), and personal use. Cellular technology has proven to be an invaluable aid to community emergency service providers ' in that it provides a rapid, efficient means for the traveling public to notify emergency services in the event of accidents, fires, and crimes -in- progress. AirTouch Cellular is currently a cellular provider for emergency services for the greater Metro region. Tigard's emergency service providers desire additional cellular communication capacity in order to provide enhanced service in times of large scale emergencies. The proposed site is especially critical for providing quality coverage for emergency service providers in the Pacific Highway and 217 corridors. Another benefit of cellular technology is its ability to compliment the existing land -based telephone system. For example, the windstorm of December 21, 1995, interrupted standard phone service in many areas. Our cellular network allowed emergency service providers and public utilities to continue operating under these difficult conditions. 1 Cellular communications provide a larger variety of communications options while at the same time preserving livability and valuable resources. For example, in today's fast -paced business environment, wireless telephone is not only essential for business transactions, but increases time savings (=proving economic efficiency), and in many instances has the ability to prevent actual physical trips, thereby reducing vehicular trip generation and it's accompanying consumption of natural resources. , Cellular technology allows a higher level of both convenience and personal safety for those traveling. The ability to stay in touch with your home and/or business permits greater peace of mind for cellular users, their families, friends, and colleagues. In the wake of important events and/or emergencies, contacting such individuals can be of the utmost importance. The increased popularity of cellular phones has resulted in the need for greater cellular service. 1 1 1 • AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site 1 Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 Cellular Communications System Improvement Additional cell sites are being added where signal strength is poor and to provide added capacity in 1 high call volume areas. Cell sites are also being added to better "balance" the system so that calls are spread more evenly between cells, thereby improving system efficiency. Now that the AirTouch cellular system has been in operation here for nearly 12 years, use patterns and use projections can be made with an improved degree of certainty. Cell sites can now be added 1 to the system area "sized" to accommodate local area needs. Effective radiated power is adjusted between nearby cell sites to provide good coverage (from a user's standpoint), while at the same time maximizing the AirTouch Cellular system capacity. 1 Antenna height can be a concern with some communities. AirTouch Cellular is cognizant of these concerns and minimizes antenna heights as much as possible in order to minimize impacts. Cellular 1 site selection involves a variety of factors, including line of sight connection to other AirTouch locations, precise topographic elevation, and distance and power considerations. Frequency Emissions The signals emitted by the proposed AirTouch Cellular antennae/transmitter fall between 880 -894 1 megahertz bandwidth. This range of frequencies does not interfere with those used by local emer- gency service providers. The operation of this tower will in no way affect the daily operations of these essential services. In addition, these signals do not interfere with television, FM radio, or other similar 1 electronic transmissions. The proposed transmission/receiving facility will operate at a typical power range of 40 -200 watts of effective radiated power (ERP). Structural Characteristics The proposed monopole has been structurally designed to exceed state and local regulations for ' towers in accordance with EIAITIA -222 -E standards. These standards dictate that in Oregon, cellular towers must be designed to withstand an average maximum wind speed of 95 miles per hour. From 1 a design standpoint, the proposed 80 -foot monopole has a telescopic steel structure that is heavier at the base than at the top. In addition, the footing of the monopole is buried below grade to a depth of approximately 6 to 25 feet. This construction technique allows the monopole to flex when it is 1 subject to high wind. The cross members that sit atop the monopole and hold the antennae panels are also engineered to withstand high winds over long periods of time. The hollow nature of the mono- pole causes the steel shaft to bend instead of breaking if it is struck by a falling object. One potential cause of monopole collapse would be an undermining of the soil strata upon which the monopole footing rests. Extensive soils analysis for engineering parameters, such as bearing capacity ' and plasticity, allow the structural design of foundations adequate to preclude such an event. Nonetheless, should such failure occur, it is not likely that adjacent structures would be compromised. To date, there has been only one recorded incident of monopole compromise in the United States. 2 1 • , AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 1 This compromise occurred in southern Florida during Hurricane Andrew (which had sustained winds 1 in excess of 120 mph). The monopole compromise consisted of a 5 to 15 degree lean in the mono- pole shaft. ' Monopoles are generally not affected by icing since there are no horizontal components for ice to cling to. Any ice that would form on the tower as a result of freezing rain would slide off and fall to the base of the tower. Since freezing rain episodes are not typically associated with high winds, falling ice would not pose a hazard to any surrounding buildings. If required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), this monopole may be lit. FAA approval of this facility is a requirement for the cellular courier, above and beyond requirements from the City. Proposed Cell Site 1 AirTouch Cellular plans to utilize a vacant portion of the property located at 12925 SW Pacific 1 Highway (currently zoned General Commercial (C -G)), to install a new cellular transmission/receiving facility. The new cellular transmission/receiving site is proposed to improve cellular coverage along the Pacific Highway corridor, between Highway 217 and southeast Washington County. 1 The site is accessed from Pacific Highway via a paved parking lot on the east third of the subject property. The lease site is located in the southwest corner of the site, on an area that is currently covered with grass (refer to Exhibits A, B and C). Development on the site includes an L- shaped, two building (one - story aboye grade fronting Pacific Highway) surrounded by parking lots on three sides. The site is located immediately to the south of a convenience store and gas station. Other adjacent uses include apartments to the west and commercial development across Pacific Highway to the east. Adjacent zoning districts are General Commercial (C -G) to the north, south and east, Neighborhood Commercial (C -N) to the northwest and Multi -Family Residential (R12) to the west. AirTouch Cellular's radio engineers conducted a service area study to determine siting criteria and the acceptable geographic area for the cell site. When feasible, AirTouch Cellular installs antennas on existing structures (e.g., water towers, buildings, other transmission towers). In the case of the proposed Tigard site, there are no such features within the technical search area for "co- locating" that meet AirTouch's technical criteria. The proposed site was found to be the most suitable site in the area. In fact, without a facility in such location, it would be necessary to install multiple towers on both ends of the city to provide equal coverage. 1 Construction and Post - Construction Activity AirTouch Cellular's construction schedule spans an approximate 30-40 day time frame. The construc- P aPP Y tion schedule allows for mobilization, material delivery, poor weather conditions and other scheduling constraints. Therefore, the actual time period for erecting the monopole and installing the equipment shelter may be less than 10 days. The equipment shelter and cellular equipment is pre - manufactured 1 3 1 ' • 40 AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site ' Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 ' offsite. All staging of construction equipment will occur on the subject property, in conformance with City of Tigard standards. The purpose of the cellular transmitting/receiving site is to facilitate cellular use. The proposed shelter houses the transmitting/receiving equipment which is fully automated (unstaffed). Occasionally, the equipment requires maintenance or repair, in which case a technician will visit the site. Typically, this would occur approximately once every 30 to 45 days. ' IL REQUESTED LAND USE REVIEWS The applicant requests the following land use reviews from the City of Tigard for placement of a ' cellular telecommunication facility at 12925 SW Pacific Highway: ► The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION The project consists of an 80 -foot monopole and a 12 -foot by 20 -foot by 10 -foot equipment shelter. Twelve panel and two dish antennae will be attached to the monopole. The facility will be sized to accommodate increased capacity in the future (this site could potentially co- locate an additional ' twelve antennae), without increasing the monopole height, or adding new poles or towers in the technical service area. As illustrated in the site plan (Exhibit C), the proposed cell site is located behind an existing commercial building fronting Pacific Highway. There will not be any open storage within the proposal area, and the facility will be surrounded by a 7 -foot tall sight obscuring fence in accordance with the ' City of Tigard Zoning Code, Sections 18.100 and 18.120. There will be 300 square feet of land- scaping around the lease area to screen the proposed shelter building. All existing trees in the project vicinity will be retained, the facility will not generate appreciable • sound or glare, and the monopole's galvanized steel finish is the same finish as nearby light standards ' and will blend with the surrounding features and colors. Its visual impact will be further minimized by facility location on the cell site, cell site location on the parent parcel, and existing site topography and vegetation, and surrounding commercial development. Exhibit D shows two views of photo- simulation of the proposed monopole. IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The following is a review of applicable review requirements. ,. 4 • • 1 AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 1 Compliance With Community Development Code ' Use Classification, 18.42 Response: The use is classified as a utility. Code Section 18.62 lists utilities as a conditionally permitted use in the C -G district. C - G Zone Dimensional Requirements, 18.62.050 Minimum Lot Size: N/A ' Average Lot Width: 50 feet Maximum Building Height: N/A (non - habitable structure) Setbacks Front: N/A Side: N/A Rear: 20 feet (adjoins residential district) Corner: N/A Maximum Lot Coverage: 85% Minimum Landscaping: 15% Response: The proposal is consistent with all relevant dimensional requirements. Over 15 percent , (15 %) of the site is landscaped. The proposed landscaping improvements are further discussed under the response to Section 18.120.180 (A)14 - Landscaping. Special Setbacks, 18.98.020 Response: A 50 -foot setback from the centerline of Highway 99W is required. The proposal ' complies with the standard. Building Height Limitations - Exceptions, 18.98.020 ' Response: Nonhabitable structures are exempt to the height limitation standards. The proposed monopole and equipment shelter are nonhabitable. Screening Special Provisions, 18.100.110(A) 1 Response: No parking is required; therefore, the standards do not apply. Visual Clearance Areas, 18.102 Response: This proposal does not impact the visual clearance areas. ' 1 5 1 AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site ' Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 ' Parking and Access, 18.106.030 and 18.106.080 Response: According to City staff, parking is not required for the proposed use. Site Development Review 1 Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that the development proposal be found consistent with various standards of the Community Development Code. 1 Buffering, Screening, and Compatibility between Adjoining Uses, 18.120.180 (A)4 ' Response: The cellular communication tower and electronics equipment building will be screened from the commercial uses to the north, residential uses to the west and northwest, and commercial uses to the east and northeast, south and southwest (see Attachment C, Pre - Application notes). Screening will consist of a 7 -foot tall sight- obscuring fence which will surround the facility. In ' addition, existing trees provide substantial screening. There are several existing, mature (50 to 70 -foot tall, 12 to 24 -inch caliper) trees to the north and west of the proposed site (see Exhibit C, Site 1 Plan). Additional landscaping is proposed for the southeast and northeast sides of the site. The site is further buffered by the site's topography. The proposed cell site is approximately 10 feet below the grade of Highway 99W. 1 Access and Circulation, 18.120.180 (A)11 a. The number of allowed access points for a development shall be as provided in Section 18.108.070; b. All circulation patterns within a development shall be designed to accommodate emergency vehicles; c. Provisions shall be made for pedestrian ways and bicycle ways if such facilities are shown ' on an adopted plan. Response: 18.120.180 (A)11.a. applies to residential use only. No changes to existing paved parking lots (covering 0.35 acres of a 0.87 acre lot) are included in this application. The Pacific Highway sidewallc currently accommodates the site access needs of pedestrians. The site is currently serviced ' by TriMet routes 12 and 99X; the nearest bus stop is located on the southeast corner of Pacific Highway and Walnut Street. Due to the nature of this facility, it is highly unlikely that any other individuals other than service technicians will ever access the site. t Landscaping, 18.120.180 (A)14 a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter ' 18.100; 6 4 AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 ' b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of Subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent (20 %) of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; c. A minimum of 15 percent (15%) of the gross site area shall be landscaped ' Response: This application includes approximately 300 square feet of new landscaping, more than 15 percent (15 %) of the 1,225 square -foot (SF) lease area. Landscaping will add vegetation to the southeast and northeast sides of the site. Combined with the existing large trees on the northwest and southwest side of the leased area the entire lease areas will be surrounded by vegetative cover. All landscaping will be designed and installed in accordance with City standards. V. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CRITERIA (Code Section 18.130) , Zoning Ordinance Section 18.62.040(A)4 authorizes this Conditional Use proposal in the C -G district. Code Section 18.130.040 Approval Standards and Conditions apply to this proposal. ' 18.130.040(A) (1) The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; , Response: The site size and dimensions are adequate for the proposed use. The cell site will be located behind the existing building, preserving the northwest portion of the property for future ' development. The proposal is consistent with the C -G zone site coverage requirements and all dimensional requirements. The site utilizes existing trees, topography, and proposed landscaping to screen the site from adjacent residential uses. (2) The characteristics of the size are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features; Response: The cell site is suitable for the proposed use. This flat, square- shaped site is located in AirTouch Cellular's primary search area behind the Kim Upholstery Building. The cell site is located on the least prominent part of the site, approximately one -story below finished grade at the site entrance. Existing perimeter landscaping will be incorporated to enhance site screening. No topo- graphic or natural constraints exist on the site. The proposal constitutes an efficient use of an other- wise unusable area. (3) All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; Response: The site is served by the full compliment of public facilities. Sewer and water are not required for the proposed use. The site has excellent access to Highway 99W. Power and telephone are available. 1 1 • • AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site 1 Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 ' (4) The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter; 1 Response: All applicable requirements of the zoning district will be met. (5) The supplemental requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114, Signs, and Section 18.120.180, Approval Standards, if applicable, are met; Response: No signs will be provided. As demonstrated in Section IV., this proposal complies with all relevant approval standards. ' (6) The use will comply with the applicable policies of the comprehensive plan. Response: The Tigard Comprehensive Plan has been acknowledged and Community Development 1 Codes have been adopted to implement it. Applicable Community Development Code approval criteria have been addressed. Comprehensive Plan Section VIII (B) under Public Facilities and Services (Private Facilities/Communication) does not address cellular communications. Goal 12 Locational Criteria [Section 12.4.1.A. (1) and (2)] / Minor Impact Utilities and Facilities are applicable to this proposal. This site lies within AirTouch Cellular's Primary Search Area to provide ' appropriate levels of service. As demonstrated, this proposed location provides appropriate access and required services are available. The proposed use is an unmanned cellular telephone transmitter/ receiver station that will include a pre - manufactured 12 -foot wide by 20 -foot long by 10 -foot high equipment shelter and a 80 -foot steel pole with antennae. The site will be remotely monitored, and visited by a technician approximately once every 30 to 45 days. Site access will not cause dangerous intersections or traffic congestion. Site will transmit on radio frequencies licensed to AirTouch 1 Cellular by the FCC, in compliance with all FCC regulations and standards for transmission power levels. 1 The site was placed in the back corner of the property adjacent to Pacific Highway to remain visually unobtrusive from adjacent properties. The site, as proposed, will have no significant impact upon the 1 operations of the existing property or the surrounding properties. Existing landscaping at the site will not be significantly affected by this project. Existing parking lot lighting will remain unaffected. Adverse effects from the site are minimal. The proposed cell site will not produce dust, odor, or glare 1 after construction ends. Except for two small HVAC condensers, which generate a slight amount of noise, no sound emanates from the site. These units are located away from the existing residential buildings. Installation of this uninhabited cell tower does not affect the privacy of adjacent residential 1 developments. The proposed monopole will be placed among existing trees at the lowest site eleva- tion to provide maximum screening. A 7 -foot high sight obscuring fence will provide further screening. The pole is covered with galvanized steel, similar to nearby light standards. 1 1 8 .1 • • 1 AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 1 Some minor noise and traffic will be generated during construction, but that noise will not be heard 1 above the existing noise emanating from Pacific Highway. During the brief construction phase, several vehicle -trips per day will be generated, however, such trips should not be noticeable in this urban area or intrude upon the privacy of adjacent multi - family residential development. The site was chosen at a location on this lot to provide cellular phone coverage of Pacific Highway, while being minimally intrusive upon the visual environment of the area. Since the site is unmanned, and the neighborhood is a commercial area, the minimal traffic generated would not be noticed. VL CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing analysis and findings, the applicant requests approval of the proposed design review and conditional use permit applications. The application meets all applicable criteria for approval. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 ' • • AirTouch Cellular - Tigard Site 1 Conditional Use Permit Application October 21, 1996 VIL EXHIBITS A. Tigard Zoning Map ' B. Assessor's uarter Section Map P C. Site Plans D. Digital Photo Simulations '. (To be submitted under separate cover.) • 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 1 • 0 EXHIBIT A 1 . . _ 1 ,...L , ,, ,•.,,,,• , • • I ; ■ ---.;_j 1 : i L_-___, ,. i • ' X , I [ 1 1 i 1 N_ I. • ... ...,.. L. \ --.1- i: IA ,,i 1 \ . ; .1...._L_L-1---1- -- -I -..a'IJ . • • ..:,... 0 i I I ,,;'. xt • \.• .:1\ i 1 ilpipi.,, %.±.1... • '. - \ ,•• ... ./' ..'. ' ' • ..-* -"-- W1?" - : - ; • ( - x --42c - -- FF . ! - if ;•••• 1 I 1 .... ---.‘i. \C ' \...\ C \ ..') ./ \/.<:^\•,.>,•••.\< ..'''‘,/•,/ .)-,•":•••;' -- I i 0 c 3 '''''.-;', \•-•-. , .-" . :.:..•::' \ :<'. ,..,/-' ,;;;%:, ,' 1 - ,.., e; ?.• - 5 -, . ...1 ,,.<... ).„ ,.. zi,• ..;;.i _. d3) vT ,: V) (-) -TnT 1 of ., ,.... , J . I_LiAn_u_ ct , Lt.....6:,. --.;,,. - . .. , ..X\ . .,„> \ . .. \../,',..\ _ r ..- rr 1 3' “ .(: . \\ k .., ,- - N ./ '.• -.)' \ °I 1 1 - _ . ''. \• - ." Y .N ' . .' \ \ / / 0 "-"---' • „ - I-. tfl it Ill 1 ./ %.:17 : ‘•>■.; / l' CD.. ''..: ,". ..>:1.'‘`. .- 44 k 7 :114DRII -- 7 1 •• 1 .- Fl UT I 1 --./..<" 1 ] \ Z 1.44' .4):.: ; .=•-• . ,,.._... /7 -: Cd L J .,..'' .•‘. \ •\;.\\''..'..; ..... \ c \ ...:.::.:::.: \.::::•.'::)\ s ,. I • 1. . - - - - - --) .::' .... • •(:....).. A / ''.:..< „. / ....-,_,,s'kw.. /kJ.) J 114Z 1' i • • • j • • • - . -..1 ...7 "-IT-1 ''F*P • .... ......-:-... : , .;:i ' 1. i IR ri . it '1 . 1. - b,+( -. ' I I :...., 1 ..... • • '.. .* .. "-?'. ' ., 1/4. ..\, + 1 $ 4 1 1,1 " :.•: : .. \ \ I 1 " I • • 1 1- 1 e \, . • '.....4c, ../.!,4.4! • v .10/";: ---- 1 I .• I I::: Lit_ / 11: .. it 1 ' /////:•');'.: ...'...\:.' \ ,14....49:17....,' .... ...--lig.: ...:,,,,, .".......c\ ' --- \ .',. •-• X /,',f '47;WKI, , ; ` ' "I/ 1 'T. - • - -. - r* I l i • • ...‘fli I, .• •• -li - . 1.-1% . .'• )b \;."-: fliii .:•••'!.• ..\.•. '`., '''.• _A • ; Y.< - - ..,s . • ' IV 1 • / I t i •,e, .r., .'....: .4 / • , ,/, \ ..:'''''''''" (.• '; __ r_ 1 F D jl. f .- :1, ,--i 1 , i • - = ,, I . /.:"..4,1- • / N, ' .. .. V .\ ': .•' / \'•.( ' .." .-..-,-`,.=1.' Y., .1 di .1_ ! lir - 1 - 1 i.f:.' , 'Ill ,- , f s - /,../.../ . -,, N ...' ` , c.7' , .• )-' . 1 . 1 j T-1 1 / f 1- FT . :LET- - .. , ,i, , L . . ‘ , •,, N •• •... N ... . • '.\ s CJ L a , ___>.. N• '`. ‘.. 1,4 •••••;:•: • C* V f j %... 2. s • r I, . . ..' ......1 I .P 1) , , ' I b ' • \ 1/4I C‘I .. -- >*\i s )* L. A. • -..-'\, '..., c -1.\,,,-...... 7 . 1 • L.:., • -- . \ . . .. LI . ___ , i.o.„.. pa.7 l... . ..,. „..,.. ,.:,::......• \. ' \ III • - :1 . .. -• 1711 . / , it T .;.1...1k. , s , ,„ , , , .> -, , . \ .. , 01.„. \.......-\\ L \ .......,.., • - ..,/ , , ,.. . : ..,...; - Fri] -7; r-, 1 , .. 1 . • ,/, a ' ' l I. - -.1.7 .MV 1 - 141 itt. / • • V/ ' 7' 1,.. 7 . ...,/ _.. ,---. , : --- ' .... crN, / ..-\-.......,•\ .„ . L ../ .. , j -,..,.,...: .- . p. , •- ... ,. . ,...N., • / 1 < - , ' .• ' - ,4 "' \- -t r . \`• , '' \ ‘ ..*.ti ..._>:- .: ..-. • -' . (' , - . a . :;-\ ■ .4,4, ' . ">-/,(•';,: \.. .)::-<\.\ k • / . .,,.... / ./ . 4* .'"''///' V \ ‘7 'C' V or.,. ,.. `,-• ! .,......,-- ...7 • I LI •,•";. • I - - • --Al .- -..--. s. ' / / ('' / . ./.:)\\ i > /: • I V,. 1 ... \ %.) t '... ................... • ••s• 1--- ' \ /.‘i >,' \ . ' t '‘‘`• .. \''' \...-.1.1..›,.." 11 •..... . , .... • qv 1, ,..: ' .., \ . c. ... ,... _ - ) ..... ,........ ', A . ! ''''--, . El - •7• --.--■ • `-.,? i ..' / < s.. -...../ ,.:4 ---7 ...-:--:,---='---"-. ‘,-.' --, ...,Nk',1' . ?..i,..,, y. `i ,; '>. %--.I ...• / 1 li, : .., , • 1 ."\'' -- I 1•••• /'s. .1 i---, in ,_.; . • t 1 , ,•„ s .st,‘ ' ,A -,,....., u.,-- z ,...• ••., '''',74.,.)-..--ts c., ,N . ,.,. 4 I- s \ • ...' . I •,,, ,.. \y"M. .$7 / ;') / / ' . • .>c 1 1 I i / 0 V' ' a ,.. ,. •. 1 .,.....,..... . .._.. ,..., ,:., ;, • . ...., J (. 4 I '1 ir ...... .\ . / I I 4..-.'. / 's T .-- • ...1 .. t ... IV • . l.i .. ..\\e ), 7 / • s ° >rr.1‘ ) . -- I r ,,, .• .,. , ,... / N, ...\..., • . ;t1 . , '''',- 1, ...- 1 !'- I • • . ) ,• • ••.0. , , / .). • , • .).... 1 ' ff, ,- ..- , r ; 1-- • '.." ‘ C.. ; ) g.•4‘-0 ,* #'?.24 1 . /... ".. ; ‘ </ s . 7 / - V__- I ■ , -. ' ‘":11c.4 11 l''•\ „ ‘_ '''' r.70,.. ". i;,.., ,-,....„,......-_- ev_L . , ,,,,,, /- ' ' .. . "?' .1-...4 • 1 .11.1 ; ..g:tz... 0.. 1 .1, ' T _C\,1.._ ' ..:*'': ..,71; 1 " . ' \ cc.....!. ' / 1 . 1 1 mi [ ...1.... ! i_ __LI __• 11 _L . 1 ,, • ,., ,k,-1 \ ..• c....:ett ., ,, 1 , 1 . Il. - - Z - 6 - - r‘,. ... 1 I .14 [ -1? t'7 ' . \ \- u% .1 ' / WI 1 1 1 - I --- - I 1 ,-,.......y.,.... , _ _.., , ,, • 1.-:- 1 i ---s--.1'' ■;nr..... \ .. ... rI r 1 tr) .. r .11 ') r - E -- I 1 1 1 \ \„•;.,x„,,;;,-\\ „:\\,...-.\ ......i _ . 1 1 ..._.., --- 1 • • •, ; .. 1 i - , - T ......... 1 1 • ---) I •N \• .\ \,..; %- ,;"'1,1„...V . Y. - 2 ---1 '•-• I i• - ---; .t'avt ' • i::-.1 • ' I -1- - -__.: ; IT. . ‘, ';.,•• . N . .'• .. .., Nyz ! ..: 6.. • - 4 .....-.. I • • ..rj 1 1 • I II Oil ;•• hzt;'.'-'tats, /-10 .\\;..\ •-:,... \ \\;\ 1 \ ':. \ .;,, \. .4 C - 50 - 1--il t -1-41 [1,4 1 [1 1 -I 3 . - .1 2 ) ' \' ..V7 F :1-21 Err 1 I i 1 , r---1 I, ! • ■ . r-...:At.• .. \ ,,,,),\ \k, ' -1...i.i - _. 1:. :,. --I ri t -r 1 . - -- 7 ',-:-'7" -- 1•*77TI :, ..- 1•; L ' J IX ' -1 0 0 ‘ \ • \ \ .1" ,' - ''''' 1 .1r. - . r L-7-,,AITI 't44.4 1 - vl__ \ \. ..N. .. ...r . " ...,+,.. ; I , 1 r , _ . L _ J , 1 0 1 _. , : _, .. \ : 1 •• f \ 1..at / I, 't 1 1 ... Tr 1 ..----._. _... 1,,,..:i.1:1,•4J 4.) ' '' . ..:L L'"-''''- 1;Z . . \•\ \ s il' I 1 %, \Z ) .....,.., . n 1 1 1 ;......07.,,v .1•:::,., .A. - ij 'Ill: Lirt c•, ;= 1 1 :!! ,.71,..1....Li . ._ _ Lit.' l' ,',;:i.:5:7-, N.-:**2...41.-4 :is„.'. \, -..,,--\•\ \ ‘ , 1 \ , \ • -\*„..., \ , N‘it NS ' . . \ \ ..% ! 1 • .. 1 ' ... • IL. 1 "*".k-C CD i ,:' VI , 1• .. ...-- . , 1 i . I -77- : L' ....r71 ■ \" s \\ \ \ \ \ 1 \ '' f ) .. 4 1' %. -1 ‘ f i 1 '•••• -1 n I CI) .11 ._ .. ._ i I . • _ _ 1[..',- •I• :_,_.10 \ \ ., ,W'';'`', ,\ , '''' \ ..,..6..:d \ :1 •\.-..,-:‘,\L.0'... :1 Lt i n I .. r *- : :"1 1 • 11 I i 1 I ' /. • i \ \ \ \ \‘ \ \ \ \ ' \\ h - ..-‘ ' 1 7 :1-1-H-114- 1 j. '.! . ';`..1 • \ . ' ‘,. _. ‘.: ■ 2. • s-;\ \ • ' -% . .\ .1/N v4.V \.... , ... . .- . ...1 ..., A j i . .' i t rtc. \ j L ' ,, %, • . L , ! , ,, \ \ \ :t . Ni q„ .. "grit .. _ .• ,'. j ' • I ' . • • •- 1 1 I : 7 141 II ,t1 I F ill iMr9II:J171._ i t'..;C: ' \ \ 1 ‘. t . \ \ 1 \ i's- .. -'1%\ .' ... A • :1 -- -- ' " :-1 .' I ' \ \ F EL • - \ \'....„ l' • r l \ ‘ • • ''.A N :1:1- \ . 1.' L.L...;.;:-. ... 'c•-fr-i , ..;,, ..,,..4 , ; i'rlor!._ • I i...;• •,,i ''... .N.i.-.., il_ _IL 1 1 , r 1 i . .k.,,_,.., i L_L:_, _1, , 1 ..„ , .. .,,, ..,...\\_ _,/ 1_, _.:, 1 \,.L, 4 „Li ,L-i,, : .'',z,\ . . \ , \ .'s \ ..t.\\,\ . - •> 1 -7 ' i"' -. WI - \ • - 1 1- • 1- 1 1-- A .s.-',..Y., \ r \ r - '1;•''. • .. _ _ . . 1'7.1 \ ,...1 L,1 4 ..-..s' Ss., s • .. \ ‘‘‘ s. ‘‘\ N i ," / . • • 'i 4.•,'...• -: . ---- ill' '•\"' s..' • ‘. '.• -. .. \- ....` - i. I t otts" - ; • ,-, -1 r---," ‘\\* \ \\, .,_,__.., ,......• ,..... .\ \ vb .' . \........I r, -- , ! % L.,... 1 -.--, 1--:_ .: ..z,":•,\I; ''s,„ \ \ ', I I-- \\. N 'Ni' \ N \ N:k . v ' 1 4. 1 " ',..■ i , ., .s,... - • .. ., .' /. \ V 1 . 10 • r \ : . ! ' ! : P \ •.,:,,, ,„ \ : ..,\‘‘ . \\,,\ \ , ' : ‘ ,\. ‘: :M , , , , , ......: 1 § ; : \ • \, ... 4 .., \:, .\\` ..`.,' * i , • .• .1.4..", I IN O NM I al. Ell NM 4. 11. 111111 11.1 ingi OM IMO ; 2300 o ce_ � ° a d � �i l r �� rNuEr �` ,� ���� a 4 ; 1300 ,2 /Aa .s� b' � NOR - n-: -.1--.' � ' %�`� ! toe j' ; •t, o \ at �� .. a , /7Ac. 14 00 'ee . K �`' a a $ . ti 'e .28 Ac. • ;•:p • b i ∎\ %° . j, 2 201 / • ,•,te iv y / Iaoo a ° ui 2400 \ I. eo : .35 c. / •. 4 01 X42 AG e j o V �, o ' �e P� 1 r o = _ v ° • . (C S No 113741 `` 22 00 a . \c �� I' , � b ° r l CS. No. 13151 1 .19 A f� c E � e ' o TJ a , . 2100 r .234c. o �° • � 10929) / i s �� . ■ 1 01j1r ' ) 4, � ,� � 39 ` �. 9 20 00 as• = :, . 30 by \ � 6 � %If .25AG �l.. ' • • a0 ;: 'Z600 2101 ,�,'& 4 , . i'''' 4~ s .� �� Cc; �' (C .111121 I �\ �� ; I . fro\ ii" 10' . ..• TT! oiN .:-:.:.:-• go 91 cy ; �, • � / o \dam, 4, f 2700 :•�;; {' �4ry• \ �i' 'r,* .35Ac. d ie' ' :� 71.-t:-._ 3 / .6 /Ac. '1 2800 • .. • = 26 AG ' • o . ; i '. '' . �"' 3 2900 '� .32Ac. c _ � .. '�. � a ' 3000 e � • •244c. w CO v` .n W Scale Unknown • 1 * 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I EXHIBIT D I Digital Photo Simulations I (Will be submitted under separate cover) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • Table of Contents 1 VIM ATTACHMENTS A. Authorization Letter from Property Owner B. Letter of Support from Property Owner 1 C. Pre - Application Conference Notes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ATTACHMENT A Authorization Letter from Property Owner (Will be submitted under separate cover) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OCT -24 -46 THU 01259 PM THE MERIDIAN CROUP „ .4995 Pe FROM Fr 1 K I UUCH CELLULAR -Q •�i ?rn :.: - • • • ' ' 1 +' INHLOF EM_Lay_AiznER_OFAUTh.Q1AZAZDN l'he underafyru;d is the owner easement (tho "Property”) ("Owner") ") of the properly, premrses or P tY ") d ?scribed as follows: gS rk at. The Owner does hereby grant permission to U S WEST NewVector Group, Inc. operating as AirTouch Cellular and its and representatives (herein individually and colle refer, en�plcYefer consultants " for d period of ninety olte red to as 3 enter onto the Proper ty and contiguous property owned ho controlled b consent, Owner to for the purpose of performing y the Owner f ru he p g an inspection of the Property, including surveys, a strength analysis, subsurface assessment, and other ar:tivities 03 Nev" s ` boring tests, an environmental sits cost of NewVector• to addition boring may decor necessary, at the sol the F'rppert , NewVector may remove samples of the soil from Y• NewVector shall be solely responsible for the actions of its employees or contractors white on the Property. Owner grants permission to NewVector for the err ose obiainin9 all licenses, permits P • p of making applications and b4a tying all e • and any and all other necessary approvals, at Proposed lease premises. that may be required for NewVector's intended use of the p rrrrtises. aertualUiee. NewVector shall restore the surface of the Property i• oric�'n::�' 4on�:or;r as nearly as practicable GCCasioned by to the extent that ;he riistu bance, r � y :tiewVeCtor•s inspection. 'K• The individual executing this consent on represents to NewVector that such individual is authorized toedo f so action of the Owner. the Owner Y requisite OWNER 13y Its: Date: 10 ROE -3 B/ 1195 OCT.25.1996 4 :49PM W &H • NO.151 P.1 /2 PACIFIC TRANSMITTAL S.W. Nimbus Avenue (503) 626 -0455 •Planning 'Surveying 'Environmental �� �•��/��� Beaverton, o O _ R. 97008-7120 Fax (503) 526.0775 'Enginee •Landscape Architecture Services To: I - lL� RED bat (S I Dat 012-1 a f � c . ( 0-f- r ( 1 Y 4 _ Project Numbe4l o70 Z. - -_ 8(trd 7 j Project Name: o Q.l qcj eel( ...sit e_ 6 � ( 117% Regarding: 4c-- 'Fit - 643 4 . -- ?29 letutow g. 54 -Fra►t 1.4- 4+ PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY AT (S03) 626 -0455 IF TZERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS RECEIVING THIS TRANSMISSION We are Sending: These Are Transmitted: Copied To: Attached N For Your Info/File _ al Facsimile ❑ As Requested — Number of Pages Including Cover ❑ For Review And Comment El 0 Copies Description — ._. l r .r or- AIA*1 i 3 a.tfil h -Of ..... -'12 5" Su,! - - -- Pa. ets .A H _ -- Comments tn a ( Y ou v recto r �3 - tom,. A pt_2.i�- ,, p- 42__/ Z & J Pc 6rc S D ire , A . • it e A ' .-ems 41! yo , pu,_ c„,a-e- 14._e_ uupoly 2 Z � ° & 7 -o4- signed at ( c S kl G N0.151 P.2i2 OCT.25.1996 4 :49PM PACIFIC • • • • • • $F eiratiantERAFAMISMIIIMI rite estemoot (the n eo is the owner rovrtieri of the peter(y, prornutes or Prupefty 1 dasortbail as fellows: `al a v S.W. forc.SCS4 liSirtiwk1 Group. f T i Owner daps het Or Parmulo t to U 3 WEST NawV.RQr r ° o se AirTouch CsBeier ere( its *aurae. emplanes. consultants ' s erdves thwrgin indrvidvstly aM! cdteetivety referred to as "WiliitYaluttn. for is Defied of oinoly (SO) days from tiro date et this consent, to .tar 4 Mo the Piopiay and cofttpwu, property mooed 6r • dtf:ar 0 ns* of perforrl+aep an of of i P controlled by the u eye. * length amply*, sebarrr taste., a ;miming ental s e �en•nt, end uthpc kt;�rteEos as N.w` Dorir+d tests, an er>v�arurer�ial site ' otut of �Wyeter. M a� - Teeter may doom �aN. et the solo 'tht+ �, Newvuotor may remove *temples of the soli from employees - AdWVeerer shall ap so the ° white on the Propeesponsible for s rty. (=tons of its OWrW giants permission to N6wVector fort . pur of ms vbraimne °y des. omits fnrits o t arty end NU *thaw pop eiiona of KavAtne erQ m►p e. that may be r ewired f or Nee�rVeotor� sDprovsls, eat Dryad teed* p, se S interwar! use of -, 'nr V �� _ tort± to wrfoce of tn. Property to es�o ed by NevrV a• id rho e+RoNt diet the estv.'bieie+s ;e Qaot a ,. The it nividerpt as►•ocutinti thin reDtdyrrts to �rYeetor that such n�vidust i3 � °n Do of by the r qu iJt °moon et the **net. authorized w CO by rota • By: DUE t<x • Robert Kim, Trustee 1 Estate of Rosemarie Emery 1360 SW Woodward Way Portland, OR 97225 (503) 378 -2911 x 229 Christina Simon, Manager of Construction and Acquisition AIRTOUCH CELLULAR 15575 SW Sequoia Parkway ' Portland, OR 97229 RE: AirTouch Cellular Communication Facilities 1 September 26, 1996 Dear Ms. Simon: This will authorize you to sign applications for landuse actions submitted to the City of Tigard as my agent. I understand that these planning and permitting documents are being prepared by W&H Pacific, Inc. for submittal to obtain necessary planning 1 approvals and building permits for the development of cellular communication facilities at 12925 SW Pacific Highway. 1 1 Robert Kim, Trustee of Estate of Rosemarie Emery 1 1 1 1 ' • •ATTACHMENT 3 Robert and Penney Kim, Trustees: Estate of Rosemarie Emery 1360 SW Woodward Way 1 Portland, OR 97225 Owners: 12925 SW Pacific Hwy, Tigard, OR. 97223 Contact: David Kim (503) 378 -2911 x 229 City of Tigard Planning Division Y 9 9 Attn: Mark Roberts 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR. 97223 1 RE: AirTouch Cellular Communication Facilities ' October 10, 1996 To Whom It May Concern: 1 We are writing to express our support of the proposed telecommunications facility to be located at 12925 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard, OR. Due to the unique shape and placement of structures on our lot, we believe this to be a very accommodating space for this type of use. We have had several opportunities to discuss the project with AirTouch Cellular staff, and it is our opinion that they have done their utmost to locate and screen the tower and accessory structure as unobtrusively as possible. The placement of the tower near the existing trees will minimize its impact to both our property and the surrounding area. In addition, the proposed location of the structures is preferred over the empty lawn 1 space in the NE corner of our lot because we hope to reserve that corner for future development. 1 Sincerely, 1 • ' Robert and Penney Kim, Trustees of the Estate of Rosemarie Emery 1 1 1 1 - •ATTACHMENT C '' i� . . 1 . .i,I 1 • CITY OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD 1 PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON - RESIDENTIAL 1 . DATE: 6 Z'r TAFF: 1A4 a3 APPLICANT: 4. i v 2 T t.t A CE 11 (a AGENT: (( ( /4. ` r/�- �tVI IN Q S listO GttN/S "dt •hone: ( ) 2� e ra d Phone: ( ) 6 ? _ <S" G � � I ' ROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS. I ` Q 2. Z S S w Ajc/c 4,7O, 4,-v / TAX MAPITAX LOT: 2 5 1 0 v3 D 4 i( ECESSARY APPLICATION(S): (nt-toliAmei us.F R. v'lu 1 7 `V cog a 14 ce- I ' ROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: 13 „lid a KO rat t toKo eon' ze 11 e l 4 v- j�.el..e rou.,,,a u t ) ca ,c/ use,. OMPREHENSIVE / / ' LAN DESIGNATION: `i.t , e L Co 1M w �,vcld l (C — G ' ONING DESIGNATION: t/9 e ttevrc,{ (owt tntedctal (c C ITIZEN INVOLVEMENT Z. L4VL 1 FACILITATOR: ,ee St EAM AREA: PHONE: (5031 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS tio u Minimu lot size: LI s. - . • -rage lot i •- 0 ft. Maximum buildi g height: I/A ft. Setbacks: front ft. de '7() . - i. corner £i �r ft. from street. 1 Maxim m site coverage: Z % Minimum I. • - .: -. or natural vegetat on area: LS % • (Refer to Code S n I W1 ev2 , eiGg , O :wed re sided - Jai Zo tie p ut, ei- I TY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 N.Residential applicationiPlanning Department Section • • 1 )DITIONAL LOT DIMEN IONAL REQUIREMENTS 1 Minimum lot fr tage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as art of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. The depth of all Tots hall not exceed 2 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1 times the minimu lot size of the applicable zoning d'strict. in,� (Refer to Code Section 1 .164.060 Lots) 'ECIAL SETBACKS J � 1 , ➢ . Streets: feet from the centerline of SLt) racJ c ➢ Established areas: Gt/ • feet from ➢ Lower intensity zones: f Q feet, along the site's boundary. 1 ➢ Flag lot: f side yard setback. (Refer to Code Section and 18.96) I .. ' ECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS .---- -" " - • ' ' 44 = Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non - residential zone may be built to a height of 75'x' feet provided: i ' r.. 1 ➢ A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; t • '' ➢ All actual building setbacks will be at least 1 /2 (half) of the building's height; and i I ➢ The structure will not abut a residential zone district. t ?` • (Refer to Code Section 18.98.020) -..�,. • IRKING AND ACCESS - ° ' - - - -' • '• - ... .. ..'. _' ,. Required parking for this type of use: I Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): Lj Q Secondary use required parking: 14 Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): 14 A I f .. • - ..n 4.' of required spaces may be designated and /or dimensioned as compact spaces. 1 Parking stalls shall be • imensioned as follows: > Standard • .rking space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft. 1 > Compact pa ing space dimensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft. (Refer to Code Section 18.10 .020) 1 > Handicapped parkin • • All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and 1 dimensioned disabled • erson parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be pr• ided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disa oilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A . 1 handicapped parking space -ymbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be pos -d. Y OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 1 Residential applicationlPlanning Department Section I • • I Bicycle racks a required for multi - family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces sha be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular I parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: ©K e. Minimum access width: C . 1 Minimum pavement width: • hip, , A Drive -in use queuing ar s: Il (Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108) . ALKWAY REQUIRE ENTS Walkways shall tend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevator of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide I the required access nd egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi - building com ercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed tween a new development and neighboring developments. I (Refer to Code Section 18. 08.050) !LADING AREA REQU EMENTS Every commercial r industrial building in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a I loading space. The ace size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section .106.070 -090) I VISIONAREA - The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height a road /driveway, road /railroad, and road /road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area I: depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. ' , , - er to Code Section 18.102) f _ BUFFERING AND SCREENING 1 In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or erices may also be: required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. - The I required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation; fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional 4. information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Community Development I Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100) It Y OF TIGARD Pre.Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 -R aoplicationIPlanning Department Section • • 1 The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: P P P ft. along north boundary. ft. along east boundary. 1 ft. along south boundary. ft. along west boundary. 4 n aciciitina f ight obscuring screening is required ang ., a i irnucid " t k t . eq uffjp Id18ct 1 c' a 4014443 4. 4.-- Tro (A t/kel ' ley() ( ' . . 1 .NDSCAPING Street trees are required fo all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which, are more tha 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the • public right -of -way or on private • operty within six (6.) feet of the right -of -way boundary. Street I trees must have a minimum caliper •f at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 0 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Furt •er information on regulations affecting street trees may be I obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven 7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all I parking areas i • •er to provide a vegetative c. opy effe a • . • - • • . • • . - . - Inc u•- specia design features w lc - -c ive y screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed I information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108) 1 3NS , Sign permits mu be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for 1 Sign Permits" ha out is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be rmitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alterna 'vely, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the ' Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Section 18.114) 1 :NSITIVE LA S 1 The Code rovides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas within the 100 -year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 I percent, or o unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre - application onference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitiv lands areas. and their boundaries. is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas I meeting the defi 'tions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development applic tion. 1 Y OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes • Page 4 of 8 1 9eoidential appiicationlPlannmg Depanment Section 1 • 0 I Chapter 18.84 a o provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential evelopment is prohibited within floodplains. In most cases, dedication of 100 - year floodplain area to the City for park and open space areas is required as a condition of the 1 approval of a develop ent application. 1 (Refer to Code Section 1 .84) 1 TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS 1 A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is 1 filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the following: I b Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; 1 . b Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. 1 according to the following standards: ➢ Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a I ➢ mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two - thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section I 18.150.070.D; ➢ Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 1 18.150.070.D; ➢ Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; I b Identification of all trees which are ro ose r p p d to be removed; and 1 b A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. 1 Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 1 18.150.070.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.025) 1 Y OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 •Residential application /Planning Department Section • • i 1 1 TIGATION Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ' ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: I ➢ The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located 1 on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. 1 ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent P p y y, sent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.070 (D) aRRATIVE The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32) • )DE SECTIONS • 1 18.80 18.92 1004 .. _ 18.108 120 _ 18.150 18.84 _ 18.96 _.✓ 1�02,L _ 18.114 '� 18.130 _ 18.160 18.88 18.98 ►/18.106 - 18.116 18.'134 . 18162 ,' t/18.164 :IGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your a pplication or the application will not be accepted. ! OF TIGARD Pre.Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 residential application:Planning Department Section • RECYCLING I Applicant should con ct franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625 -6177. I (Refer to Code Section 18.1 ) I DDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: • I CI Tt ►s advl aty Q s•Ye Joe des' u 1 - �o ; _ , �`o(loW ._ • c c- loc'( wl■ c+4 e/" - Gel tia tAA_ mum i ca JouS yro d.eds 1 ti o ia -' "i a (foil 60 k 144. (t � ( ,tales t4Q 5-6 r e _ - \ H � w� tM �c�� . V i c t H � Df ea c bided/04 W - ,) N '✓ ea a a v eas 1 5 ireorttlecdA ► 55 (1. Va-v tIAACQ-; 61.€AMOIA si-reS 1-Kiegf cirCavii Sfetm4 P 1,euS� v" v id- 0 N �S x t 1 p 4 JZ_ f _ 1 r OCEDURE administrative Staff Review. 1 ✓Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission 1 making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. I PPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS I All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or d-_:pped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications I submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 Residential appucauomPlanning Department Section • . Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch ' ' by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted, 1 The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff 1 will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or 1 protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows, all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard Gel Cou k a / . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is availab4e from the Planning Division upon request. This pre - application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the 1 prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE:, The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. 1 Additional pre - application conference(s) is /are required if an application(s) is /are to be submitted more 1 than six months following this pre - application conference, unless the additional conference(s) is deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division. • . 1 � er PREPARED BY: L �4i"e4/ `J CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: (503) 639 -4171 FAX: (503) 684 -7297 ;in 1patty lmasters',preapp -c.mst leering Section: masters\preapp- c.eng) OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 ;esidentiel application:Planning Department Section • • CITY OF TIGARD Alk MM NITY DEVELOPMENT P T. CO U DEPARTMENT MENT 4�,, 1 APPLICATION CHECKLIST CRY OF TIGARD 1 The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your I • application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. I See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639 -4171. . Staff: 144 Isle Date: ‘/-2,5- I APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS I A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization Z-- C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed -- -- zi� D) Applicant's statement �,, No. of Copies t E) Filing Fee 1.:.* E , f _ *, $ 16 IS t lu ''fly i); 7- I `^�'" i, . t to q_. 2 of 1 / 0 0 Iowa FDQ ( SITE - SPECIFIC ��IAP(S) /PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS I CL U E ./ ARKED ITEMS I A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies 16 1. Vicinity map d/: 1 2. Site size & dimensions lo 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0 -10% or 5 ft for grades > 10 %) ❑ 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds o I 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: o (a) Floodplain areas ❑ I • (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground o (d) Areas with high seasonal water table ❑ I (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential o (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils 0 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive I Map Inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands 0 I 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" +. caliper measured 4 feet from ground level ❑ 1 . . 8 Location of existing structures and their uses: C.----- 9. " Location and type of on and off -site noise so ❑ 41.0, Location--of!e`x`isting utilities. and easements �� 1 �.. _ .. �"-a =-i+'_E,i -: =:x . ,�rtz ,. , • ^ r �;:r . :: ,ts 1 1. Location or existing dedicated ri -of -ways + ' I LAND LSE APPLICATION / LIST PACE 1 OF 3 B) Site Development Plan Indicating: No. of Copies I 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties m� 1 2. Contour line intervals o 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and 1 easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site ❑ I (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ❑ 4. The location and dimension of: 1 (a) Entrances and exits on the site igi • (b) Parking and circulation areas #1• (c) Loading and services area ❑ (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ (e) Outdoor common areas ❑ (f) Above ground utilities -.... ....__,. -.—_ _. . .- ❑ 5.7.: The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: .::J (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and; IN easements.which li•e located`ori the site an _ d on adjacent / • property wtHin 25 feet of site �•- •�" " " "� � • � (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements 1 on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ 7. Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ 1 ' The location areas to be landscaped �---- 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ t 10. The location of mailboxes . _ . ...,. . _ 0 1 The location of all structures and their orientati 12:' Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ I C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies I The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1. The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: I (a) General contour lines ❑ (b) Slope ratios ❑ 1 (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) ❑ (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development ❑ 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual 1 substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ❑ (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service.proposals ❑ I (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated ❑ 1 1 LAND USE APPUCAT:ON / UST PAGE 2 OF - G<<O � D) Architectural Draw kiss Indicating: •No. of Copies /0 1 - The site developmeVplan proposal shall include: 1. Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures ' I • proposed for use on -site 2.' Typical elevation drawings of each structure 1 E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies 1, I The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: I 1. Description,of the irrigation system where applicable, �I' 2. Location and height of fences, buffers'and scr'eenings d. 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ I 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials to 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ❑ 1 (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ F) Sign Dra 'nes: o 1 Sign drawin s shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code a part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining • a Building Per 't to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generan Estimate: ❑ I H) Prelimina Partition /Lot Line Ad'ustment Ma • Indicatin • : No. of Copies 1. The own . r of the subject parcel o 1 . 2. The owner authorized agent o 3. The map sc. e (20,50,100 or 200 feet-1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description o •arcel location and boundaries ❑ 1 5. Location, width .nd names of streets, easements and other public ways within and . • jacent to the parcel o 6. Location of all perm,nent buildings on and within 25 feet of all 1 property lines ❑ 7. Location and width of .11 water courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees wi in 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above I ground level o 9. All slopes greater than 25% 0 I 10. Location of existing utilities a d utility easements ❑ • 11. For major land partition which reates a public street: • (a) The proposed right -of -way •cation and width 0 I (b) A scaled cross - section of the • roposed street plus any reserve strip 0 1 2. Any applicable deed restrictions 0 13. Evidence that land partition will not pr- lude efficient future land division where applicable 0 1 LAND LSE APPuCkTION I LIST ?AGE 3 OF 5 1) Subdivision Prelimi a at Ma. and Data Indicatin:: 10 of Copies 1. Scale equaling ' 1,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet o 2. The proposed nam: of the subdivision o 3. Vicinity map showi : property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ I 4. Names, addresses and elephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and ,, esigner (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided o 7. Names of adjacent subdivi ion or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un -sub• ivided land ❑ 1 8. Contour lines related to a Ci \ - established benchmark at 2 -foot intervals for 0 -10% grades greater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type an• size of all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private right -of- ays and easements ❑ (b) Public and private sanitary aid storm sewer lines ❑ r (c) Domestic water mains includ g fire hydrants o (d) Major power telephone transm'ssion lines (50,000 volts or greater) o I (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for parks, ope , spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances 0 10. Approximate plan and profiles of propo -d sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on t e plans ❑ 11. Plan of the proposed water distribution sy tem, showing pipe sizes and I the location of valves and fire hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable • istance beyond the limits of 1 the proposed subdivision o 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right •f- way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inundatio or storm water overflow ❑ 1 15. Location, width & direction of flow of all wat= courses & drainage -ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate I •t dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for pu poses other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such Tots. ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inch or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of p .posed tree plantings 0 18. The existing uses of the property, including the I•cation of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a state , ent of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ • 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ I (b) Proof of property ownership 0 (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetf nds & marsh areas ❑ 21. If any of the foregoing information cannot practicabl be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narra ive and submitted . with the application ❑ 1 ill t.ANO USE APPLICATION / LIST ?ACE 4 OF 3 • • )) Solar A ess Calculations: o K) Other Infor .tion No. of Copies 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' h:login\FaMAInasten \I<klist.rnst May 23. 1995 1 LANO USE .APPLICATION J LIST PACE 5 OF 5 • • Alb City of Tigard. Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L Lunsford, being first duly swom/affirm, on oath depose and say: that am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: 11A:6,0 ca.rfr e.a att.vR r aoprca.r.l O er t aop�onatr tax bebw) (Enter Pubic Nearing Date above) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director a / Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) DECISION FOR: �an•*•••••••....•..w City of Tigard Planning Director { ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) FINAL ORDER FOR: • Risk am mein. r app.ra.Y) per* appropriate box below) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", wa iled to e-ch - - -d pers•n(s) at the addresp(s) shown on the attach list s), marked Exhi a) •n d - y - /., %�i � / 199 (fi , and deposited in the nit States M -;, ,_ih _/ 44 •-y of 199 ' postage prepaid. frifile0 7 tP l gl°9 4 Ail A. A7t Prepared Notice Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the / day of to! ALA. , 19L �', OFFICIAL SEAL �r.+;�'. a DIANE M JELDERKS i � .� NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON /./L.! • � . � COMMISSION N0.046142 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07. 1999 NOTARY PUBLIC F ► - GON / My Commission E pir- s: °J /7 9 PILE INFO.-e7 I � agie,414 / �/1 21 U b CASE NO.(S): 4 -z 9 f 9 I'YPE OF `OTICE & DATE: (/ • •XPI . • CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE 1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 9,1996 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: _. FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0009 FILE TITLE: AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE APPLICANT: W & H Pacific, Inc. OWNER: Estate of Rosemarie Emery Attn: Chris Eaton 1360 SW Woodward Way 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Portland, OR 97225 Beaverton, OR 97008 -7120 REQUEST > The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 60 -foot tall monopole tower with antennae and equipment cabinet on an existing commercial site. LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 02BD, Tax Lot 02600. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.120, and 18.130. ZONE: General Commercial (C -G). The purpose of the C -G zoning district is to provide sites for a wide range of goods and services. Utilities are also permitted subject to approval of Conditional Use Permit. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTEF 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639 -4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684- 2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CUP 96.0009 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 12/9196 PUBLIC HEARING ♦^ t� • ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER NOVEMBER 18. 1996, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE -NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY -FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY -FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS AT (503) 639 -4171, TIGARD CITY HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. Z / 1.1 * -i.* S . ice' /, 'alb 1 *' . 1 `�-t4 I r4W 1 Ell �t ♦♦ I •.. r a , .. • 04 , /* Aar al p 0V 4 $$$ ■0 /\°((.0 CUP 96 -0009 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 12/9/96 PUBLIC HEARING 0- u. 'Ile ODOGI f}i much 1VLn'i volt ' C F6 l o • 2S102BD -01001 2S102BD -02200 EXHII T _ 3 BLINE, MARY C AND BUSCHA, HELMUT AND ERIKA BLINE, MARY C TRUSTEE 6215 SW 41ST AVE 2981'SW FAIRVIEW BLVD PORTLAND,OR 97221 PORTLAND,OR 97201 2S102BD -02400 2S102BD -02000 CAMPBELL, CHARLES A COMET CORPORATIO SANDRA RAE BY DENISE MC 12820 SW GRANT AVE PO BOX TIGARD,OR 97223 P LAND,OR 97228 2S102BD -02101 2S102BD -01700 COMET CORPORATION DAVIDSON, WILLIAM G & DIXIE L ATTN: DENISE MCKEE 12830 SW PACIFIC HWY PO BOX 5969 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97228 2S102BD -02600 2S102BD -02500 EMERY, ROSEMARIE TRUSTEE ERICKSON, EDWARD J BY KIM, ROBERT & HAE LIM DIANE 1360 SW WOODWARD WAY #2 ABELARD PORTLAND,OR 97225 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S102BD -02300 2S102BD -01100 HANSEN, DOROTHY L HARDY, GERALD T Go FINGER, ROGER A & PHILLIS 4618 FOX LN SOUTH • 610 NW SPRING AVE SALEM,OR 97306 PORTLAND,OR 97229 2S102CB -03101 2S102BD -01900 HUDSON, MARILYN D HUDSON, ROBERT E ESTATE 11795 SW KATHERINE ST BY MARILYN HUDSON PERS REP TIGARD,OR 97224 11795 SW KATHERINE ST TIGARD,OR 97224 2S102BD -02700 2S102BD -02800 KAF, INC KAF, INC BY KATHRYN A FUHRMAN BAKER BY KATHRYN A FUHR ER MOTO AZABU TERR APT 501 MOTO AZABU T PT 501 2 -11 -5 MOTO AZABU, MINATO -KU 2 -11 -5 BU, MINATO -KU TOKY0,10 JAPAN 0,10 JAPAN 2S102CB -02800 2S102CB -02900 KEERINS, HERMAN 0 & PATRICIA E KEERINS, HERM ICIA E 12195 SW 121ST AVE 12195 SW VE TIGARD,OR 97223 T ,OR 97223 2S102CB -03200 2S102BD -02100 KEERINS, HERMAN 14rRICIA E LIM, KYUNG S AND YONG H 12195 SW E 10803 SE BOISE ,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97266 2S102BD -00904 2S102CB -03000 PAXMAN, SUSAN RAHIER, MARTIN D 9995 SW WALNUT c/o TRAIN, ARTHUR T & JUDY M TIGARD,OR 97223 12990 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD,OR 97223 �u N Klp 1-1100Ltat ,iLuIvvrdor c (P6 i f • 2S102B0-02201 2S102CB -00200 ROBERT RANDALL CO, THE, ET AL SCHOOL DISTRI Go LAND, RICHARD L & CHRISTIN , 00 9500'SW BARBUR BLVD #300 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S102CB -00100 2S102BD -01200 SCHOOL DISTRICT N TOSCO CORPORATION 00000 ATTN: TAX DEPT 2300 CLAYTON RD, SUITE 1100 CONCORD,CA 94520 2S102BD -02900 2S102BD -03000 TRUCK TERMINALS TRUCK TERMINALS INC 1825 SW PHEASANT DR 1825 SW PHEASANT DR BEAVERTON,OR 97006 BEAVERTON,OR 97006 School District No. 23J W& H PACIFIC, INC. Attn: Susan Stark- Haydon ATTN: CHRIS EATON 13137 SW Highway 8405 SW NIMBUS AVENUE Tigard, OR 97223 BEAVERTON OR 97008 trUMMUNI l Y NtWSPAPERS, INC. Legal T1 68� P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503) F C ; t, Notice T 8 ° BEA VTO. G7075 ng Lega Notice A dvertis Cl YOF - I •City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice T GARr. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. •Tigard,Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit • Accounts Payable • s Officer on - the Tigard Hearing The following will be considered . at Tigard on. Both Public, oral and Hall;131Z S•w•$Ot •fi pu lic hear ng on this matter will be AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION i written testimony Officer, Failure conducted in accordance procedures Hearings st the Tiger IV STATE OF OREGON, .Municipal Code, -and rule letter accompanied by statements or COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) )ss' Mu = to raise an_iss ci en person or by. the ri on from th e evidence sufficient to low a hearings y parties to to specify and t p I. Kathy Snyder ..respond P recludes an appeal. C ommand Development Code.oi Compreheennsi�ve pl crite n n. Further. being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising y` • - based Director, or his principal clerk, of the c3a rr� — T»a l t in 'T'imes comment is ma y be btainedf o a h be obtained from the ling ►v (503)-639-4171. S. - and 193.020; published at ircula ardef in ORS 193.010 _information > may be Oregon 97223, Y „ g in the _ _ ..., :..�;. — > :s. _ � aforesaid county and state; that the - - � i ' ' �� - iO�r - " '- - _ = - CUP96 -0009 Airtouch Cellular Mono PUB "`�'"';� - '` B�''`�' �Y �; = a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the ! Y '" -CONDITIONAL USE MONOPOLE < :. " ` .- -Y�` . AIRTOUCH CELLULAR pERm val lo dev - elop an entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and =� - uestin Conditional Use — Permit apro consecutive in the following issues: The applicant is req g ui merit cabinet on an 80 -foot tall monopole tower with antennae IO 2925 SSW, Pacific.Highway; :- November 2 8 ,19 9 6 `existing commercial site. LOCAT ZONE: General Comore ride )'- == - The 2S102BD, Tea Lot 02600: royal of a . se of.the C -Ci zoning district is to-piovide sites for a wide range. 7- The urp also permitted subject to app i ' o and services. Utilities are I o f g Conditional Use Permit. Uti Code Chapters Bed subject c 98 E8 omf 1 . III Ka ' (� ,,�,,,, Community 18.1 pme _ - ' "i, '-� "' v 18.102r Community 18.106; Development and Code Subscribed and sworn t Wore me this2 8th c3 �y n f Nove � �� .k * - .� L'4 — 6--- � � 1.; = 1 ®' 4ic p o f dp � � Notary P l for Oregon ` ; ' ' � . `` My Commission Expires: � � ,� ` S� T - AFFIDAVIT �i - p m , o a t ._ -,„.,. � 1 : 4411111101 i 1 ;. A ‘ 4.# . - el#, • • • - . \ %. 4 ,--1 alle" *St 4 0 #4 -.-.' 1----1 ,1 ! L___1, % A ., ■ otkv I: 7711689 — publish November 2.8, 1996. . • FAX TRANSMITTAL 4 DATE: November 22. 1996 TO: Mary White, Legals (fax) 620 -3433 FROM: Patricia Lunsford, City of Tigard (Ph.) 639 -4171 PLACE UNDER CITY OF TIGARD LOGO IN THE LEGALS SECTION The following will be considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer on Monday, December 9. 1996 at 7:00 PM at Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. Both public, oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and rules and procedures of the Hearings Officer. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to allow the hearings authority and all parties to respond precludes an appeal, and failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 or by calling (503) 639 -4171. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT [CUP) 96 -0009 > AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Q The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop an 80 -foot tall monopole tower with antennae and equipment cabinet on an existing commercial site. LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 02BD, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General Commercial (C - G). The purpose of the C - G zoning district is to provide sites for a wide range of goods and services. Utilities are also permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.120, and 18.130. -P • 4. . , 4 , # 4 . % s . . . 4 • *4 4$*** . ‘# c p I SU 1 if) ® ,s4i0 1 N* .# 1 . pir .. , a ii 11,411/* .,.. .. , , ill . . 1 Iii. 4 ; . ,,,, „„„, .. TT PUBLISH DATE: November 28, 1996 CUP 96 -0009 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 12/9/96 PUBLIC HEARING • • I W, • • v //////// !.." TAX / / / 1 1, % R-42 REM V / j a. 1 SETBACK 20 / / `b 4 * / TAX LOT E' 1 C-41 REM TARO T _ _ V • . x R/B1 r as iY1.J0 '%`'1 �R ABVftKM RESIOENC R I - -� � � _ 1 ..... �J. c� � il- I j/ ///// V W.�e + ,, .. roe s 4 4 ` / / 1 � • tN• `' N4617131.- 4 617 13 ... I 1 / „ / TAX lAT • Z Qns,.. , : _ — ra _ � ' ' 1 ' 1 / 2100 I \ ■ I '"' 1 ^^ ` "' ! rANO TAX LOT iJ = a ' 4 1 I / / :MA - o' .P-18.. 1 2!Oo _ ' • , ,. . -.- •: 1 ' �.; ' / / / / / //,4 Ell 2000 ` S . : - : . I 1 1 L 1 !' `� 1 TAX LOT J 1.1 - - 1 1 j , '4 * r < / //////// I 2700 1 You 41 Mill . _ - -� . ) f N , / SETBACK - 0' ! \ �, q I / % I :ill `Tp I i TAX LOT TAX nor CC SPE 080 2000 OW I/ / 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 /1 1 I SETBACK - o' I/ 1 1 .. I n.n2 E 1 �% Q T =RI wAr 8471211318 lose' QM aB1E]lur - - - CC \ *It - r� -- - - - - 4_ ,„ ______ STATE HIGHWAY 99W - L � / V ' \ i (PACIFIC HIGHWAY) - 1 1 : / \ _ ___ _ _ ____ 0 . >- 0 • • PLOT PLAN ) CASE NO. Air Touch Cellular Monopole EXHIBIT' MAP I CUP 96 -0009 e, imp ..4110 . 4 Or v't i • # 41 . .4. •,# 4N P got* , 4 ■ • Ai, • • . 4 4 ** IP* 4$ *" ,z1 4, . S A al a) : ‘ . " su + Q , P' g WO& c t-, irvie \tk,4., _ a: co wicTAL4 _ N 4 -4-,,,,p_ E i, . I" co . Iml, ,4%-. # P aim* # *4 0 l ' P.* VI 0 ' 1 4$ A 3 ‘" * 0 r iri! to% . * s# 0# v... � Map A C UP 9Cr0009 Monopole AirTOUCh Cellular • l % . # 4 '' 1. Al If ,: ....alio, iliPP • et IIIIIP 41p, o. T • 8 ■1* (II ,* 4 ... ,.. ., 4. ...‘#, 4 4 4. - 4 C P . 4 , Al % r , 41 14 , . 4V4 ' 0-0 , 04 • CO C 4810480 -01001 2810280 -02800 ■ E , PBD• , ,i 0280 424 2 280-0 p 0280 -01 80 -02 ' 0 2810280 -02201 10280-0 • 10 2 ∎280 -020''1 281 80 i `' 510208-01101 2810280 -02000 2 0480 011 C I t 2510208-00200 25 250.0 28 2 104 0 80-02 2 :0 1 0 B0 -02 0 810280 -01B� ■ 4810408 -08101 • 8,CB8 D • YS CB-0 O ', \ 0-0I00 ' 208 -08' , 0 AM is ooiloio -01 a._ as 0) ._ ■ 111 - 4 s ■, 4 0 ' • 0 1 ......., PARK ST 10# 1 IV 4110;01:, 0 . _ . zi, q .000. * . ., .- Vicinity Map CUP 96 -0009 Notification Map N • • �� III1I CITY OF TIGARD Shaping J4 (Better Community REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: November 6,1996 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts 1x3111 Phone: [5031639 -4171 Fax: [5031684-1291 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUM 96 -0009 ➢ AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE < The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 60 -foot tall monopole tower with antennae and equipment cabinet on an existing commercial site. LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 02BD, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General Commercial (C -G). The purpose of the C -G zoning district is to provide sites for a wide range of goods and services. Utilities are also permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.120, and 18.130. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - November 18. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the abovq date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v (Please provide the focawing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: 1 Phone Number(s): CUP 96-0009 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 44 1 out, 6:eat a - 14"o uP'‘-CCd l RitUEST FOR COMMENTS IP t NOTIFICATION UST FOR LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS CIT Area: (W) (S) (E) (C) CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS m Placed tor review in Library CIT Book / _ CPAIt?MENTS _ IDG. DEPT. /David Scott....•o•wo.... OU T. /Kelley Jennings. a..,..... .,, .., oe,c. _ O /John Roy. 1....w..u,.p. _ CITY ADMIN. /Cathy wheotley. aw...... - . DEPT. /Brion Roger. o......,..,,......t .,.. _ DEV. DEPT. /0.S.T. S ADV. PING. /Nadine Smith. •,.,.,...... _ WATER DEPT. /Michael Miller. O..oron...o. /o..o..0 mad ... SPECIAL DISTRICTS FIRE MARSHALL _ UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DIST. Gene Bircnell SWM Program /Lee Walker PO Box 74S wo. County Fire District 155 N. First Street Beaverton, OR 97075 (pick -up box) Hillsboro. OR 97124 AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS WA. CO. DEPT. OF LAND USE & TRANSP. METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION _ METRO - GREENSPACES 150 N. First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St. N I6. Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's /ZOA's) Hillsboro. OR 97124 Portland. OR 97232 -2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland. OR 97232 -2736 _ Brent Curtis (CPA's STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION _ Jim Tice (IGA'S) Som Hunaidi _ METRO _ Mike Borreson (Engineer) PO Box 25412 Mary Weber _ Scott King (CPA's) Portland. OR 97225-0412 600 NE Grand Avenue _ Tom Harry (Current Planning App's) Portland. OR 97232 -2736 _Lynn Bailey (Current Planning App's) _ OREGON DLCD (CPA's /ZOA's) 1 175 Court Street. N.E. _ ODOT /REGION 1 CITY OF BEAVERTON Salem. OR 97310-0590 Transportation Planning Lary Conrad. Senior Planner 123 N.w. Flanders PO Box 4755 _ CITY OF PORTLAND Portland. OR 97209 -4037 1120 SW 5th _ CITY OF BEAVERTON Portland. OR 97204 _ 000T /REGION 1. DISTRICT 2 -A Mike Matteucci. Neighborhood Coordinator Bob Schmidt /Engineering Coord. PO Box 4755 _ CITY OF DURHAM 2131 SW Scholia /PO Box 25412 Beaverton. OR 97076 Planning Director Portland. OR 97225 Beaverton. OR 97076 City Manager PO Box 23483 _ CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO _ CITY OF TUALATIN Tigard. OR 97281 -3483 City Manager PO Box 369 PO Box 369 Tualatin. OR 97062 _ d'OTHER% Lake Oswego. OR 97034 _ CITY OF KING CITY City Manager 15300 SW 116th King City. OR 97224 SPECIAL AGENCIES _ GENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC _ PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _ COLUMBIA CABLE CO. Paul Koff. Engineering Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 146.5.5 SW Old Scholls Ferry Rd. 14200 SW Brigcdoon Court Tlgard.OR 97281-3.416 Beaverton. OR 97007 Beaverton. OR 97005 _ NW NATURAL GAS CO. rw.: (MI )11.2450 _ METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _ TRI -MET TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT Scott Palmer rac (!.2177,•21.2 Jason Hewitt Kim Knox. Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue Twin Oaks Technology Center 710 NE Holladay Street Portland. CR 97209 -3991 1815 NW 169th Place 5 -6020 Portland. OR 97232 Beaverton. CR 97006 -4886 _ TO CABLEVISION OF OREGON _ US WEST COMMUNICATIONS _ SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS. CO. • Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Clifford C. Ccbe. Const. Engineer 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Ook Street 5424 SE McLoughlin Portland. OR 97201 Portland. OR 97204 Pcrtiand. OR 97202 _ BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION _ BURUNGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD PO Box 3621 Attn: Administrative Offices Routing TTRC -Attn: Renae Ferrero 1313 W. 11th Street Portland. CR 97208 -3621 Vancouver. WA 98660 -3000 STATE AGENCIES FEDERAL AGENCIES _ AERONAUTICS DIVISION (000T) _ DIVISION OF STATE LANDS _ US POSTAL SERVICE _ COMMERCE DEPT. -M.H. PARK _ FISH S. WILDUFE Rcndy Hummock Growth Cord. _ PUC _ DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station _ DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUTY _ U.S. ARMY CORPS. OF ENGINEERS Portland. CR 97229 -9998 _ OTHER iku3a..v.,m..,.vw..e.., ...pm a ,+.al : I PACIF?C 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008 -7120 July 8, 1996 Dear Property Owner and Interested Party: RE: Proposed Cellular Communications Facility W &H Pacific is representing AirTouch Cellular, formerly USWest Cellular, who is interested in installing a cellular communications facility (including a 60 - fcot pole and equipment shelter) at the southwest corner of the property located at 12925 SW Pacific Highway (Kim Upholstery), also known as tax lot 2600, 2S 1W 02 BD. Installation of the proposed communication facility requires a Conditional Use Permit and in this case, AirTouch Cellular will also seek a variance from the rear yard setback standards on this commercially - zoned lot. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding properly owners and residents and hear what you have to say. Therefore, you are invited to attend a meeting on: Time: 7:00 to 8:30 p.m. Monday, July 22, 1996 Tigard Water Board Building Red Rock Creek Conference Room 8777 SW Burnham Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Please note that this will be an informational meeting only, to review schematic plans and discuss the implications of these proposed changes. We look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 626 -0455 if you have any questions. Sincerely, W &H PAC( IC, INC. n ‘ ' 7 /-1-g,e1 (67/1/ Cset etA.--417)—) Chris Eaton Project Planner (503) 626 - 0455 Fax (503) 526 -0775 Planning • Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture • Environmental Services • • AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE V' 1' H1NSEM <::7'C4I7ADAYSOPTHg..X .N.l'.........RE';r......... .. . . I, Julia R. Haykin , do affirm that I arm (represent) the party i interest in a proposed development affecting the land located (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) gt 12925 SW Pacific Highway (tax lot 26001, and did on the 1 lth , day of July, 199., personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a Conditional Use Permit/Variance application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign(s) were posted at northeast and southeast site corners. Southwest corner of Walnut Street and 99W, (state location you posted notice on property) • 6w+-- Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) \� Subscribed and sworn/aff day of U.Y � / , 19 �. umed before me on the r , OFFICIAL SEAL . , s NOTARY Ill MILLER r / u / /, ARY PUBUC - OREGON 1 - -- COMMISSION NO. 036419 r NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON p Q' . � ` MY COMMISSION ON EXPIRES JULY 19, 1998 ( I / D My commission Expires: U- 4 1 9 (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: Cellular Communications Facility TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Conditional Use Permit/Variance Name of Applicant/Owner: AirTouch Cellular (4- 1620 -0702) Address or General Location of Subject Property: 12925 SW Pacific Highway. Tigard. Oregon 97223 Subject Property Tax Map(s) and Lot #(s): 2S 1W 02 BD / Tax Lot 2600 • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS. City of Tigard ) I, Julia R. Haykin , being duly sworn, depose and say that on July 11 , 19�¢ I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 12925 SW Pacific Highway, Tigar Oregon, a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 7405 SW Garden Nome Road, Portland_ Oregon 97219, with postage prepaid thereon. Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 1 I day of 19 c r(-) . OFFICK SEAL . I/. /LP' I, cr �� o3s4 a OTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON f A 1 Y COMAI�SSION EXPIRES JULY 19, 1888 f My commission Expires: aTAL6, ( 9 / g q g- i (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: Cellular Communications Facility TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Conditional Use Pennit/Variance Name of Applicant/Owner: AirTouc Cellular (4- 1620 -0702) Address or General Location of Subject Property: 12925 SW Pacific Highway. Tigard. Oregon 97223 Subject Property Tax Map(s) and Lot #(s): 2S 1 W 02 BD / Tax Lot 2600 - • • 111 RECEIVED PLANNING • MAR ®7 1996 Name of applicant Matrix Development s p ro p er t y: Tax map and Lot# NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Section' T2S R1W Lots: 100, 200, 300 Address or GeneralLocatlon Corner of S.W. Hall Boulevard and S.W. Sattler Street AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE 1. Chris Eaton , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed Comp Plan Amendment /Zone Change affecdog the land lotted at S.W. Hall Blvd. & Sattler Street & P1a j _D t Over ?ay Ma rch 19 9 6 personally p o that Qdy notice the site may be proposed for a Comp Plan Amendment /Zone Change apn, and the time, data and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. &Planned Development Overlay The sign was posted at See attached Map. (State location on property) This 4th day of March . 19 96 0/144 Signature Stied and swan to. affirmed. before me this 1 day of /Y)61.4 J6A M . 19 / I P cies -AA-4- Ct6MgEFV A o AFB Notary Public for State of Oregon N3TARY MEMO - O . ; My Expire= 1Ylm X121.0, / 9940 !� rg };RS�SiQU NO. 014215 Pr tSSK:I EXPIRES MAR. 2S, 18866 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard. OR 97223 logtAjcApostrtoult 1: 1/4., ..,_„...,_.:•,; :: › r z , 1 . • _ . 1. 1 : . ,.._:- : i . , 1 1 i-- ------ :-. • . ; .:-...._i F-.,_,- j . .1.. I • --, LIlif . • -_-:' L.,... ..___, i , - -1 , P -. ; X-' ! • -- -..: ;------- • 1 < , - v•-q-___J - --, - , I I II !: 1-' :---, '-----. :- :- --'‘..., ! ! . i ! _.,. ,:,;,. .. ______. . . . . , • , ! i : J I • __ \ \ . s - .. 1; c'z. od , • . _ . • 1 1 : j , . • t T W ALIT Y .:;-=':.*-- -•:-- 1-F...,-,•22 • r•• 1 ,-.-_-; ; -1-_•;!. ) ..----7-7--- ......_ 4 - ■ -7-Trrg • , ;---:---,-,,,---, s.,• , T ___,.., ; ,_, ,_ Iffil JuNtoR H .---2-. t \ • .... , ,.._ 1•7 ' - . --R-1-7 .`•- .k--1A.;:,c • '-' , , , (1);_r I I -- ____LIILU -- HIGH i • , . . . ,___ • . .---• ,---. ,-,- . :_-.,...-.-,,,, 1 i 1. c . ; I c--).--,-• , !--, : - ; •,- , - , ,____, 1 i 1 I ,____, ,...,,TH L____L___ . I i V t,-,..,...1 I — 1.- • • ' I . (PD 37. S CH OO L r\ -- n - i ------ T ‘. 'T • .-,1 )__: , :i,--i0"-.t ,.,' \ I I `>'11 L • I•P sk..n,,..) 1 ,,--... —, , . --, ...,__H ,..; ,:______. ,_._______ — 7 . , ; ,-,--,•-7.... I___.: -- I i i_ ,!.. j L___J___., : 1 I vT"- iLI I 1 VA& 1 r _.. :-.; -_, •; _.:---- -- .,,,_! --.• I IS! ! I ! --.,' I 1.• 1 . Fr" 1-';', •...,.., 1 EN 1 [ 1 1 ,. i 1 itflf,..:•: _ - I-• t \ \ i, C.:ARDINJ i •-____,---. I I th.c•ILY I ...:--, ;'. r ....-1,-,•,- ,-. .. j ,C -.- •-,- . .,, r.„= 1 t I • 2 1:: - .):''-.:• 3 : -3-;' , , i 1111'1: .-*. 1 • .ii MIAMI 11:''. ).,t , '.--1•-•:.-_, --i p_ j ...., . ._ . ,,., .- l„ • ..,-• f*ITIU 1---: • 1.. o'S , -----" '' •.!', \ • ‘ N._ 1 Lt1 ,. _____ A• I \ n .II ,---, rr : , •., - . INEmpLETON -- : L . 1 - - ;, 11--- -- -) .-. (- ,--c it :!_ li o,4 : — " 1 -.5 -11 11-1- D I t--t-'--1---1.:--H -1 — • .... ..,..,, i I * ---1 I I * I **- 1111 - 1 ....■ I *I.11- ' ' - )"'---• V - I I 1 I r 1 51 \- [ • ' F PI -- 1-: ii.c._;:.:.••?.. .!•...,.:-.!.., , i • .. -- \ I , d ■ T FL's !.''' '' --_.-_;_; ---,1 ei . fro.f • , , i - -- - -. • "-.., - . ts - 00- ' . ' ' ,.: -,,,:...,:::. •„,.. 2.___ _______. 1 \,. 1-- -, 1_ . --1 ,-,__ i , , __ lLi - _ - :_ t ______. , , --. .. 1 i•. , i' ,-1 1 1 •-t . ... , , • ; : c; 1 ,:......:.: 4-4 ::,,, c. I l.E Mall I ( i - II I 1 L I i -I m 1' 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 . _ „_,_,_ • _ _1 f ___. ..., -- -'-- - - 1 i__,. -,_-----4 ,.._ . k242,51 'i .-,.;,.. !, I; , , I PE DWOOL i - -- 7 I..... ---- i: ‘, . ' I 1 i L ._ 4.__!,...!..,........1-.:.__ r • .-ii'c,.. 0 /I 1 ' i , :,..J....,,,-.- ,.--...:!,,,,-,i,.:.. ...•;.-:,.. i. \\ , I LN 1 r-6-4 inihu =-1--' - t- i'',, T : !-- i S,..:;7' , e' r l I ' M11112ti '7-1-I -11 ,41-2- f-- I f-f- , , E. A9,11 _Li 2 .-- L. ' '' '- II ' •"--:-- -;,-,-- . 11 — - _I i_ - - \, \ 1 ( , ( NMI t___L.i. !.:_....._:__:_• .- 1 -' '--;-' r - ---- ' ••., 1 N.- 1 r -I. 1 ! • - -- - I ! - 7-7-, -•-' • i•-...;...i _.:,---_-:-._ ___L__.--1 .. ,- 1 ,... 1 -- i I_ I i IT1 • _A_ - .•../ 1. . i--4 * ... 1 .---17-7•7 S"-7- - 7 -- ., ,= ,.. / . r -,-- ,1 , Rn!- - - -■:). 2 ' -- / '''.'..".."'"-- 1 .1 1 i '4 • illVE1 111 2 .- .": \----- . -4- • ..-.-- . i : ! '. i :;::: .. • L.: E ''' ‘. \ -1.t: ....,: ti..-J . ._,E .---' - 1 I _] LI, ' ' , 71:-_--I 1--- --'...:- :: - - - ,.::,::.;::-,,:.--:;. II' '__. _.. • l'. 1-------- I ti 7-----: - ,-- -fr_ j_. .` T - . •----=- -- : - =-Ef-:. A., , ___„.... , E . . ,..;_„.... . .,- ..,...:...;;.:..- ! • --- , L ,,., : ,. N '-. • .. ----• . • J,),;. p.,.-7 ..... 7 :-....... , ,,,..' ; - , • 1 i . , . • :-..--i- , , . • .o.- o , "'"'" "1 1 ' - ---• j--. (PD)!•Ti. ..:':" \ . Dc. '-' ' V ; ,-___-=....-- _1 t -4, i : •,,,.., ..,, i ! ! ; i 1.-- ) _:.T-1 ,,_,.. ! ■ : •..........,;.,,,... :If ..:,,, I I *'‘ ' C31 ! • * . .- ." 1 • • .:, - 2 1 1 • / *I ' .' --- *. ---I ' * 1 2 -ELj I I' I I- ' J-L I -/ Ii: % I.TI '*I-.I ' ... I i 7 -.I : ” * "' "1 I- --:*-I.I —:5 If , R4 i ._.. , . , j ,,, .2_______.• " - , ,r . -, \ L -----. 1 . . •.■:1, A L / - ? / , / . ,--. -- -- , -1 , I 'AI.. I - 1 ..,- ' I I I I I - I I I 1 ' ' I ' . . I ' * ' I - ' I ' " '' I - ' --- I I -- j * • - •,;''. 1_1 / /.... ,. „ / --, , \ 1 ,i.. , I . ..1. .... '''I.• .. ' , .. i I . • , i" -.1 ! I II I I .. i . • • • - • ' . - ' (PP) ; - — • 1 1 • 6•L• ;17 :>7.. l' , • :•)1_1 -..Irx I i , ---::-,••_f -, ' -- - • ) .- •- , LI .= - 11R ..., . _.s. . _.,._ ,,..,..„ V.. ■ I . , - - - -- --1 .... '''. n \ i . . 1 2..\-5 . .' . ." :1. :,..-, ‘- r-- '1/-s 2., .: 1 . - 'r - -- , ".--- --' -- - r .': '•' !--1 I - - •:-- - . - ! il li. 1, • •, , ..-. . - - , - / \ -C- :>•,1_2 -:_-_! i 1 _z__NI.,, ■ , ..1. : .:::':..--,- ...1-- , --, - ?; , , , ; : 1 _ ..., 1 • ,-_-; c." It 1 ' . '‘'...-- ,.- _-; 0,..11 00...L.A. 5_,- , 1 ; -N.,,ir o I — ---- 1 — ' 4. 1. 1") ...\-,;1.:/.::',1: - 1 - I -1-17 T i - 1 N - T • . - - - ':fr ; : 1 i ' : ' i III: 1 1 1 1 I 11 '1'■_ , --L.-;,111 1 11 ' 111 '' r•".:. f.:: - s . • -.-.^ iriPPA /n. ■eiti I:II 1 .:.:;''' g ‘..7 -['• V1 1 id 71 - ---' / -, 1 i I F ---- 1 - 1 ,....:i I i: : --- . \ NS- • , gm ii , ,-.. --.......,- „ i .• , .., . -----,., _,•,...,_.,..,_i - • r -. 7 , is_ili-:.:„..,._ ri 55 iG-12: • .... !// / ..,: ! III MIL _ . _ _ • , ( / Wrri'lil - - 1.1 . :--, \ 1-- -- :1 I 1 Ti L • 1 iii•Fiii - I . -p„.,._....r..,!.. 1 .. 1 .!_ . 1 . 11_1 LI ..._ i..._• ..1 ; .... , .--r --, - 1 - ----, , . . . .;_ i .... '3.1 , 75 ------- FT 1 ' , . ... . _..--•:. . ,--r.;- .. ,..,:c • -- :•••-•:.: \ -- \ . I ‘...... I I ."..... .1' H ---'..1 r. TIGARD 1 1 , .. — , • . I ; I i R—:•..12 1 . . . .,,,..,,, • . ...//, , allk II _ i / ii k , V - ' -- 1 : 0 HIGH SCHOOL ; 1 _ -; ..k„:' • . :.-7' • /...-‘ J illik_li J.1_1 1--__ i ; • ' °' 1 i 111 4 E I 01, / h '- 1 rj-i , L i Tr I I I-7—A USA . [ ''-; . • .. . ... , . . • , - : M..'lm E i \I T A R Y 61.0 H I bot‹ :-..-:.:..,./. , I .„. -t.:,--14 ••'• , ,-- . - • . • .,. I , i • i , . ... .,.1 T____A_ -r , , 1" • A -.• ..:, 1 v.) % \-a , \l....! _._ r-1,_ L.! R I ! I • I I ,---- )) 6. I X ''''/'. 1 .. 777 , . •-) --.- --. T • Pa Ve 4,) .,. / '; -; I ---- j ; : . ---- . . ' :* / PA I i I ! . • ! ! ILO Cadti .-', ' . i • ■'. ' , 1 --- p "k-,-., ,W•• 4 q 1 v.,-...-. •; i .. „.1, n,•,, -4 Nti■ .--"---,/ - --I • I \ , 1--_-_7 ('-•‘'• - •"-' '• • • b - /4. P1/01 , • _: • . • --; I Lg ---1 - "I i j 1 , • 1 - Y-:H-L--- --- :; - ', 4 . -- . ; .• . ; ; .," ,- - I • , "---. • " • • • • • • _2_1_, 1 . : ----=---SC_Ole"- I .• - • - I N .-_ a '-',; • . ,-;---- , -__ _i______I -,...}-... ,,,, --. 4 r - • . _--- ,- .• . - • - \ \ "f• I • . ,1 # 0 gi lif -4--) ...-.„,.. 0 . .... -, :, - / . i • i „-- .„..,.:...,,,,,,,,,,.../,- • - .. • -- ,...-.2..„,.., .,,.- ti' .„:•,.;;: :_ ''''';'"'' '''''''':".....!!' // ;.:'-/ ' -- . -*•';'•• --.. ' 1 .• . . ' •' ..„ r • ...• ... s.'...J:.-.',.....i : : , , , • -- ,-... 7 i \.,,,,_ • ..s ,--;.;,:T.-!..-:: 1 !.... . , _ t_p -------:. : • - --.-- --:-....:•----.:.--, . C—G /. • , - : . ..... ..., .,....... i . 1 ••\ - ------• - i — 1 . ... N 1 1 . / , • . 1 _ 1,;:_±, ....,.,....,...,./ c_------- ,.___,..-:_v:---1,-.7- : '. --■,-- . -- / • 4 . .• -.. ... . c... I.:-.' _. i . • . I I \ \ \ !.: ./ li / • , t'l C ., I '‘, . _ e'..v.-M< _/ ,-; ...,, • , II : 1110 RECE IVED PLANNING MAR 7.1996 • AFFIDAVIT OF MAIUNG STATE OF OREGON ) )SS CITY OF TIGARD ) 1, Stacey Babcock , being duly sworn, depose and say that on March 1 , 19 96 ,1 caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at Sattler Street and Hall Boulevard in Tigard a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. 1 further state that said notices were endosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at Beaverton (97008) , with postage prepaid thereon. . ci e. Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this ( P day of MP &i1 , 19 9 ii . 05= F;c!At AL t KIMBERLY A LAME YLIIit� /�p�, a • AA-A- ' NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON pt�y Public • i CC.:1`. ::^'^,IOR3 NO. 014216 CONJ71SSION EXPIRES MAR. 28, 1928 My Comm ion Expires: f a/ic i 2-40 / 6 i' (i Pc Voginyo \affrna-ct 1 • Jack Biethan 15525 SW 109th Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97224 John Benneth 1550 SW 109th Avenue Tigard, Oregon 97224 Ray Valone City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Lary York Matrix Development Corp. Plaza 2, Suite 200 6900 SW Haines Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 R0500381 R0500390 R0500657 William & Martha Reynolds Geoffrey & Launee Reader Thomas Lacey 15025 SW 92nd Ave 15015 SW Dawn Ct 15070 SW 92nd Ave Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 :0500666 R0500675 R0507927 :;uadalupe Diaz & H Barbara Michael & Joan Arnett Edward Sattler Sr. & E Lillian DO Box 428 8076 SW 184th Ave 15245 SW Hall Blvd :amuela, HI 96743 Aloha, OR 97007 Tigard, OR 97224 R0507936 R0507945 R0507954 SATTLER AGNES ESTATE OF Lillian Sattler Henry Schmidt Edward Jacob Sattler 15245 SW Hall Blvd 15435 SW Hall Blvd 8800 SW Sattler St Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0507963 R0507972 R0507981 • Aubrey & Mary Hubbell Virginia Drumm & Carla Webber Martin & Virginia Borgford 15200 SW Alderbrook Dr 15220 SW Alderbrook Dr 15240 SW Alderbrook Dr Tigard, OR 972.24 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0507990 R0508007 R0508016 Robert & Lois Aungier Louie Yazzolino & C Carmella Helena Hoffman 15260 SW Alderbrook Dr 15280 SW Alderbrook Dr 1 15300 SW Alderbrook Dr Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0508025 R0508034 R0508043 Melvin & Betty Nielsen Wilfred Burgess & S Margaret G Homer & Grace Hamlin 15320 SW Alderbrook Dr 15340 SW Alderbrook Cir Edyth Henderson Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 15360 SW Alderbrook Cir Tigard, OR 97224 R0508052 R0508061 R0508070 William & Norma McCabe Walter Grimm Donald & Virginia Croy 15380 SW Alderbrook Cir 15400 SW Alderbrook Cir 15420 SW Alderbrook Cir Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0508089 R0508098 R0508105 Maxine Price John Irma Kreitzer Eugene Marie Walman 15440 SW Alderbrook Cir 15460 SW Alderbrook Cir 15480 SW Alderbrook Cir Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 • R0508114 R0508123 R0508132 Otto Lindeman Richard Williams & B Eleanor Allan Coutant & G Eleanor 15500 SW Alderbrook Cir 15520 SW Alderbrook Cir 15540 SW Alderbrook Cir Tigard, OR .97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0508141 R0508150 R0508169 Glenn & Jeanette Wegner Charles & Betty Mathisen Walter & Mary Crow 15560 SW Alderbrook Cir 15555 SW Alderbrook Cir 15535 SW Alderbrook Cir Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0508178 R0508196 R0508203 William Leo Hughes & Mary Sharon Pamela Porter Brandt Jeannie Wilkie 15515 SW Alderbrook Cir John Porter 15475 SW Alderbrook Cir Tigard, OR 97224 15495 SW Alderbrook Cir Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0508212 R0508221 R0508230 Virginia Hartman H W Peck & Marcella O'riel Peck Virginia Barber 15455 SW Alderbrook Cir 15435 SW Alderbrook Cir 15415 SW Alderbrook Cir Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 80508249 R0508258 R0508267 William & Jeanne Frykberg Ramsey & Joan Chaffey Donald Pinkerton & Fry Virginia 15395 SW Alderbrook Cir 15375 SW Alderbrook Cir 15355 SW Alderbrook Cir Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0508276 R0508301 R0508310 Daniel Schierman & C Emma Robert Gillette & J Maida Betty Chord 15335 SW Alderbrook Cir 15315 SW Alderbrook Dr 9100 SW Summerfield Ct • Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0508329 I R0508374 R0508383 Donald & Eunice Wilhelm Robert & Margaret Lucas Bert & Joyce Astrup 9130 SW Summerfield Ct 9135 SW Summerfield Ct 9105 SW Summerfield Ct Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0509060 R0509079 R0509088 Lester Lieberman Margaret McKeen Alva & Mary Jane Slavens 15580 SW Alderbrook Cir 15600 SW Alderbrook Cir 15700 SW Alderbrook Cir Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0509346 R0509355 R0509364 Frances Hoffman Harold Lyster & J Marjorie James Kjos 15685 SW Alderbrook Cir 15625 SW Alderbrook Cir 15605 SW Alderbrook Cir Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0510076 R0510290 R0510307 Norma Koenig Janet Lanford James Wilson & R Christine 15575 SW Oaktree Ln 15680 SW 88th Ave 8960 SW Hamlet St Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0510316 R0510325 R0510334 Chang Hwan Lee & Kyung Ja Lee Gale & Bernice Marvel Jacques Lee Voelzke Jr. 8940 SW Hamlet St 8900 SW Hamlet St 8870 SW Hamlet St 41, Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0510343 R0510352 R0510361 Harry & Sally Brown Wayne & Judith Brown Loren & Penny Jahraus 8850 SW Hamlet St 26400 SW Baker Rd 8800 SW Hamlet St Tigard, OR 97224 Sherwood, OR 97140 Tigard, OR 97224 I R0510370 R0510389 R0510398 Tony & C Suzanne Houk Herbert Berta Neubauer Robert Himmelwright 8805 SW Hamlet St 8835 SW Hamlet St 8855 SW Hamlet St Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0510405 R0510414 R0510423 Timothy & Susan Burke 8 Rupert Koblegarde John Arrigoni & R Margar4I0 8885 SW Hamlet St 1130 SW Morrison St 8935 SW Hamlet St Tigard, OR 9722.4 Portland, OR 97205 Tigard, OR 97224 R0510432 R0510441 R0510450 Fred Feather & M Virginia John & Jan Merchant Jr. Sue Higdon 8955 SW Hamlet St 15630 SW 88th Ave 15615 SW 88th Ave Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0510469 R0510478 R0510487 Peter & Cathy Herstedt James & Barbara Squires Greg & Kim Williams 15645 SW 88th Ave 15675 SW 88th Ave 15695 SW 88th Ave Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 • • RECEIVED PLANNING : 1 PACIFIC MAR ® 7 1996 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008 -7120 March 4, 1996 Dear Property Owner and Interested Party: RE: Proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zone Code Amendment W &H Pacific is representing Matrix Development, who is interested in developing property located at the southwest corner of Hall Boulevard and Sattler Street (also known as tax lots 100, 200 and 300 NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Section II, T2S R1W W.M.). Matrix Development is considering an amendment to the comprehensive plan and zoning map to create one single zoning of Single - Family Residential (R- 7) for these tax lots in order to develop the area with single family residences. The current zoning for the property is split with a portion zoned Multi - Family Residential, (R -12) and a portion zoned Single Family Residential (R -4.5). The developer will also seek a Planned Development (PD) overlay for the subject property. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary approvals, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents and hear what you have to say. Therefore, you are invited to attend a meeting on: Tuesday, March 19, 1996 Tigard Senior High School (Commons Area, enter at front of building) 9000 SW Durham Road Time: 7:30 to 8:30 p.m. Please note that this will be an informational meeting only, to review schematic plans and discuss the implications of these proposed changes. The owner does not have specific site plans developed at this time. We look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 626 -0455 if you have any questions. Sincerely, W &H PACIFIC, INC. Chris Eaton (503) 626 - 0455 Fax (503) 526 -0775 Planning • Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture • Environmental Services • • - • RECEIVED PLANNING • .. - . MAR ©7 1996 • AFFIDAVIT OF MAIUNG STATE OF OREGON ) . ) SS CITY OF TIGARD ) • Stacey Babcock , being duly swam, depose and say that on March 4 , 19 96 ,1 cawed to have malted to each of the persons on the attached Qat a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at Sattler Street and Hall Boulevard in Tigard , a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. 1 farther state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposked on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at Beaverton (97008) with postage prepaid thereon. S tili epekboaci< Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this (i day of , /"l I e,k , 19 q (0 q NIr L3 HLV A LANE ° Notary P / - j NOTARY P 'LEA - N M Commission Expires: / � ', -/ 4 1 ° coml.coml./ass= m 014216 y r .11 U � CO A➢SS= EIY S k "- R. 2a. 1923 K \IoginyoVdfma7.eit R0509346 R0509355 R0509364 Frances Hoffman Harold Lyster & J Marjorie James Kjos 15685 SW Alderbrook Cir 15625 SW Alderbrook Cir 15605 SW Alderbrook Cir Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0510076 R0510290 R0510307 Norma Koenig Janet Lanford James Wilson & R Christine 15575 SW Oaktree Ln 15680 SW 88th Ave 8960 SW Hamlet St Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0510316 R0510325 R0510334 Chang Hwan Lee & Kyung Ja Lee Gale & Bernice Marvel Jacques Lee Voelzke Jr. 8940 SW Hamlet St 8900 SW Hamlet St 8870 SW Hamlet St Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 III 80510343 R0510352 R0510361 Harry & Sally Brown Wayne & Judith Brown Loren & Penny Jahraus 8850 SW Hamlet St 26400 SW Baker Rd 8800 SW Hamlet St Tigard, OR 97224 Sherwood, OR 97140 Tigard, OR 97224 R0510370 R0510389 R0510398 Tony & C Suzanne Houk Herbert Berta Neubauer Robert Himmelwright 8805 SW Hamlet St 8835 SW Hamlet St 8855 SW Hamlet St Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0510405 R0510414 R0510423 Timothy & Susan Burke B Rupert Koblegarde John Arrigoni & R Margare 8885 SW Hamlet St 1130 SW Morrison St 8935 SW Hamlet St Tigard, OR 97224 Portland, OR 97205 Tigard, OR 97224 R0510432 R0510441 R0510450 Fred Feather & M Virginia John & Jan Merchant Jr. Sue Higdon 8955 SW Hamlet St 15630 SW 88th Ave 15615 SW 88th Ave Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0510469 R0510478 R0510487 Peter & Cathy Herstedt James & Barbara Squires Greg & Kim Williams 15645 SW 88th Ave 15675 SW 88th Ave 15695 SW 88th Ave Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 • R0510496 1 R0511707 R0512617 Donna Lynam John & Jane Schmidt Lynn McDonald & R Monica 15705 SW Stratford Loop 8325 SW Ross St 8340 SW Ross St Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0987659 R0987668 R0987677 Carl & Evelyn Yardley Robert Butler & Joeanne Butler E Gough Margaret 15620 SW Alderbrook Cir 15640 SW Alderbrook Cir 15660 SW Alderbrook Cir Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R0987695 R101562.6 R1015635 Varney Cornwell Jr. F J Scheckla F J Scheckla 1572.0 SW Oak Meadow Ln 15085 SW Hall Blvd 15085 SW Hall Blvd • Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 81015644 R1015653 R1015662 Ray Metzger Kazern Kn & Salari Marzei Nejad Theresa Castellanos 8705 SW Reiling St 8695 SW Reiling St 8700 SW Reiling St Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R1015671 R1015680 R1015733 Larry Williamson & L Sandra Herb Truax S Jane Morrill 8710 SW Reiling St 8720 SW Reiling St 10055 SW Hedges Ct Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tualatin, OR 97062 R1015742 81015751 R1015760 David Westfall & M Tina Steven Reynolds & Linda Hart Floyd & Beverlee Goff JAI, 15110 SW 88th Ave 15140 SW 88th Ave PO Box 230669 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97281 R1015779 R1015788 R1015840 Michael Berry HOUSING AUTHORITY OF Aaron & Katie Shovers 15115 SW 88th Ave WASHINGTON COUNTY 1420 Iroquois Ave Tigard, OR 97224 111 NE Lincoln St #200 -L Long Beach, CA 90815 Hillsboro, OR 97124 R1015859 R1015868 R1015877 Sharon Miller Wendy & Ronald Hughes Jill Taylor 15040 SW 89th PI 9205 NW Skyline Blvd 15080 SW 89th P1 Tigard, OR 97224 Portland, OR 97231 Tigard, OR 97224 R1015886 R1015895 R1015902 Scott & Leslie Chase Gary & Judy Slavens Mark Sahli & Patricia Callaghan 15100 SW 89th P1 15120 SW 89th P1 15140 SW 89th P1 • Tigard, OR 972.24 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R1015911 R1015920 R1015939 Eric Schamp Lana Williams HOUSING AUTHORITY OF 15145 SW 89th P1 15125 SW 89th P1 WASHINGTON COUNTY Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 111 NE Lincoln St #200 -L Hillsboro, OR 97124 R1015948 R1015957 R1015966 David Harold Riverrnan Steven & Kimberly Ann Self Mark Robert Winston 15085 SW 89th P1 15065 SW 89th P1 15045 SW 89th P1 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 40 R1016028 R1383782 R1383906 Thomas Furukawa & Y Estelle Bette Atkinson Richard & Marilyn Durand 15025 SW 89th P1 8722 SW Hamlet St 15675 SW 87th Ave Tigard, OR 972.2.4 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R1383915 R1383924 R1383933 David Dailer John Burns Jr. & D Pamela Dennis & Sylvia Ford 15653 SW 87th Ave 8785 SW Hamlet St 8769 SW Hamlet St Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R1383942 R1383951 R1392326 David Hildahi & A Lorna Gary Mays & Teddi Gordon Duncan & Deborah Cameron 8743 SW Hamlet St 8721 SW Hamlet St 15119 SW 91st Ave Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R1392335 R1392344 R1392353 Raymond HuughLon 1.1. & Li Carolyn Kimberly Hubbell Robert Ray & Valerie Harris 22401 Mckenzie Ct 15073 SW 91st Ave 15061 SW 91st Ave West Linn, OR 97068 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R1392610 R1392629 R1392638 Octavio & Cathryn Garcia Clayton & Diane Wilson Timothy & Joanna Medinger 9057 SW Westlund Ct 9045 SW Westlund Ct 9033 SW Westlund Ct Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 • R1392647 R1392656 R1392665 Mark & Kati Fantz McKee Patricia Recht David & Kyong Penaflor 9021 SW Westlund Ct 9022 SW Westlund Ct 9034 SW Westlund Ct Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R1392674 Donald Werner & A Kathleen Scott & Wendy Galloway Dana & Beverly Woodard 9046 SW Westlund Ct 9058 SW Westlund Ct 8469 SW Ashford St Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R2004800 R2004801 R2020446 William & Ann Bradley Paul Eklund Daniel & Stacy Childers 8447 SW Ashford St 8425 SW Ashford St 14954 SW Kenton Dr Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 410 R2020447 R2020448 R2020449 Todd & Susan Beahm Carolyn Nielsen Stephen Bried 14932 SW Kenton Dr 14910 SW Kenton Dr 14896 SW Kenton Dr Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R2020450 R2020451 R2020452 James & Carolyn Moll Patricia Jo O'Connor Bradley & Laurie Pittmon 14874 SW Kenton Dr 14852 SW Kenton Dr 14830 SW Kenton Dr Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R2020453 R2020454 R2020455 Kenneth & Karen Rose Kiassy Andrew & Valorie Westlund Douglas & Jacqueline Jones 0 14818 SW Kenton Dr 14800 SW Kenton Dr 14807 SW Kenton Dr Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 R2020460 R2020467 Gary & Clydene Wanderscheid TIGARD CITY OF 14943 SW Kenton Dr PO Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97281 • • RECEIVED PLANNING : I PACIFIC MAR ® 7 1996 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008 -7120 March 4, 1996 Dear Property Owner and Interested Party: RE: Proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zone Code Amendment W &H Pacific is representing Matrix Development, who is interested in developing property located at the southwest corner of Hall Boulevard and Sattler Street (also known as tax lots 100, 200 and 300 NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Section II, T2S R1W W.M.). Matrix Development is considering an amendment to the comprehensive plan and zoning map to create one single zoning of Single - Family Residential (R- 7) for these tax lots in order to develop the area with single family residences. The current zoning for the property is split with a portion zoned Multi - Family Residential, (R -12) and a portion zoned Single Family Residential (R -4.5). The developer will also seek a Planned Development (PD) overlay for the subject property. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary approvals, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents and hear what you have to say. Therefore, you are invited to attend a meeting on: Tuesday, March 19, 1996 Tigard Senior High School (Commons Area, enter at front of building) 9000 SW Durham Road Time: 7:30 to 8:30 p.m. Please note that this will be an informational meeting only, to review schematic plans and discuss the implications of these proposed changes. The owner does not have specific site plans developed at this time. We look forward to discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 626 -0455 if you have any questions. Sincerely, • W &H PACIFIC, INC. Chris Eaton (503) 626 -0455 Fax (503) 526 -0775 Planning • Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture • Environmental Services • Vr A \1\. \0■1 U • 4 TRANSWORLD CONSORTIUM, INC. \1• \ 100 Kerr Parkway #16 v■G Lake Oswego, OR 97035 VC ) e )/ 41 \ 0209, 635 3166 fax ��- � January 28, 1997 Mark Roberts Community Development Department City of Tigard Dear Mark: Regarding our building permit application (plan check # 1 -113C) for an AirTouch Cellular mobile telephone transmission /receiving site at 12925 SW Pacific Highway, there has been a minor modification to the approved plans. Our planning permit drawings show four antennas at the top of the pole and eight at a lower level. Due to radio engineering concems it is necessary to switch the antennas so that four of the antennas are at a lower level and eight at the top. The total number of antennas remains the same as in the approved plans. I am enclosing a check for $ 100.00 for the additional processing fee. Sincerely, Eero Tanttu Project Manager Enclosure: 1 cc: Joe Ahsing, AirTouch Cellular Creative Solutions ... Superior Service ►�� AX WiEl PACIFIC ;>f L TRANSMITTAL 0405 S.W. Nimbus Ave. ` � I Beaverton, OR 9700B -7120 r 'I To: j a ( lL Date: December 2, 1996 Company: Ci-ty D .F- T tee( Project Number: i 620 _ 070 Z Address: t 3 t Z 5 SW + e Project Name: - t -Z 9 , t c LQ , City /State: T 1 a 6 (L q 7 ZZ RE: Reu ;se) P latn.d Te 4 U1 g '' 77,q7 From: / t �// r Confidentiality Notice: 'this facsimile is intended only for the use of the individual GV / r� S / / v/ and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message Phone No. (503) 626 -0455 to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the unauthorized dissemination, distribution cc copying of this communication, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this Fax No. (503) 526 -0775 facsimile in error, please notify us immediately by telephone (collect). 'Thank you. We are Sending: These Are Transmitted: Copied To: ci Attached C(j i t 10 t ( 14 1 For Your Info/File C Gi ` ; �f a C Facsimile / As Requested AYE G) (32/ - LP # of Pages Including Cover (J For Review & Comment Copies Description f /d 7 2 Gut P - coo • Comments: (a ✓lG 514/1 /e vi 74) S i [r4/ P/C! scr w 17 • 719 C Calla ,' a fraert4 W del ` olua 't ✓rr „ sw ,- 3 " "`ter. P� Giles L • wi u car i / tu....ee ligv9 Engineering • Landscape Architecture • Environmental Services Planning • Surveying and Mapping Washington • Oregon • Idaho ` .= � � / ��. /����', icA - __. -_-_ _ -- I v _ -_- _- --- -_ _' -- -___ ~` - -- _-- --- -- - -----'-- --^ -----0. '--- `--~ -- - -- - ' _--- ____ _- ---- —`j--- __ - - - - j lAlp4) et 100 4e, .2 Q..- 4— -e,y..x.il iv_imafitve .4.--/e.te_ cu '7 e Ii% _ c re ,..4,_,.taffle as L/J.ewed , ?aim i frto iPgi at/t ell/1 et t a____<42_, -Vgkt2_._4,/_t______i_g4_1_____4YQ Ch_<_trAYly_____ Yik6_€., ____ t_ir pkairos__ed "4-0' cur/I/wild/ 7 Iiic , . is ,, __ _ __PaCA.11 ' * ____tet__ L.Q__-- Ir17 . ,. e x; - n- _____ , Vizt_o_u_L 4-tfolme-cat - - --__ -- . -- _ '_- _'---_ ' - -__' -- . — �� — �������` __ • • CITY OF TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER DECEMBER 9, 1996 - 7:00 P.M. TOWN HALL TIGARD CITY HALL, 131,25 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223 anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign -in sheet(s). PUBLIC NOTICE: Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the meeting. Please call (503) 639 -4171, Ext. 320 (voice) or (503) 684 -2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: > Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and > Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above. (OVER FOR MEETING AGENDA ITEM(S) TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 1 OF 2 12/9/96 PUBLIC HEARING h:\patty\masterslagendho.mst • CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER CITY OF TIGARD (.ommumty •Devefopment .S(ap }7 Better Community DECEMBER 9, 1996 - 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 >AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE< CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0009 The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval to develop an 80- foot -tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 02BD, Tax Lot 02600. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General • Commercial (C -G). ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C -G). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, and 18.164. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 2 OF 2 12/9/96 PUBLIC HEARING h:\patty\masters\agendho.mst • • Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: December 9. 1996 7:00 PM • ..�"� STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY OF TIGARD • HEARING'S OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Conditional Use Permit CUP 96 -0009 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval to develop an 80- foot -tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. APPLICANT: AirTouch Cellular - OWNER: Estate of Rosemarie Emery 15575 SW Sequoia Parkway 1360 SW Woodward Way Portland, OR 97224 Portland, OR 97225 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C -G). ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C -G). LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 02BD, Tax Lot 02600. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, and 18.164. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Hearing's Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely . affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL. STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 1 • • SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The property is developed with a retail commercial building that is occupied by a mixture of retail and office uses. In 1981 Site Development Review, Minor Land Partition, Variance, and Zone Change approvals were issued for a 4,800 square foot expansion to the existing commercial center. This approved addition was not developed. The City has no record of any more recent development applications having been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: To the north the site is adjoined by an apartment project. The proposed lease area is adjoined by the site's primary existing retail commercial use to the south. The property is adjoined by other commercial uses to the west and to the east. Site Information and Proposal Description: The western portion of the site is presently developed with a retail commercial center. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit Approval to develop an 80 -foot cellular communication tower facility and related equipment structures. The Public Hearing Notice for this request inadvertently listed the height of the proposed monopole at 60 feet. Although the application itself states that a 60 -foot height is being requested, all of the detailed application materials state that an 80 -foot height is requested. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a 80 foot cellular monopole. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a utility. Code Section 18.62 lists utilities as a conditionally permitted use in the General Commercial Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.62 states that there is no minimum lot size requirements. Developments within the General Commercial Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant has provided a landscape plan for the leasehold area that is proposed to be developed. The plan appears to provide in excess of the 15% minimum landscaping requirement. The applicant shall provide calculations concerning the percentage of landscaping to impervious surface ratio within the leasehold area. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 2 • • Setback: Section 18.56.050 states that there is no front yard or side yard setback facing the street. No side and rear yard setbacks are required except; a minimum of 20 feet shall be required where a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district. The site adjoins a residential zoning district and complies with the 20 -foot setback standard of the General Commercial Zoning District as proposed. Building Height Limitations - Exceptions: Section 18.98.020 states that any building located in a non - residential zoning district shall not exceed a height of 75 feet subject to certain criteria. Section 18.98.010 exempts structures that are not intended for human habitation from this limitation. The proposed cellular monopole is not intended for human habitation and is exempt from the height requirement as provided under Section 18.98.010. Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart. The maximum planting distance is dependent on the trees size at maturity. A minimum of a two inch caliper tree at four feet in height is required at planting. The existing commercial center does not have street trees. For this reason, the shopping center is not currently in compliance with this standard. It is recommended that this section be found to be not applicable to this proposal. The proposed leasehold area does not have direct frontage on a Public Street. The existing site improvements are not made more non - conforming through the development of a new communications use. This interpretation is consistent with the Non - Conforming Structure provisions of Section 18.132.040 (C). Screening Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has not proposed to develop a parking lot in conjunction with this use, therefore, the listed parking lot screening provisions are not applicable. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 -foot distance along the street right -of -way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 -foot distance points with a straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The height is measured from the top of the curb. Where no curb exists the height is measured from the street grade at the center line. Trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has not proposed to construct improvements that exceed the aforementioned height within the Clear Vision areas. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 3 . . Minimum Off - Street Parking: Section 18.106.030 does not specify a minimum parking ratio requirement for an unmanned utility use such as the proposed cellular communications monopole. The applicant has not provided a parking lot to serve this development. Because there is no minimum parking ratio for this type of facility, no off - street parking has been provided. Access: Section 18.108.080 states that commercial and industrial uses that require Tess than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30 -feet, and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. This use does not require that parking spaces be provided therefore, two -way access is also not needed to serve this facility. For this reason, no specific access width is required for this use. Through the Building Permit Fire and Life Safety Review, any necessary revisions will be made to this plan for emergency vehicle access. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, 18.134 18.150 and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Sections are reviewed within this staff report. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (Sensitive Lands), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), 18.120.180.11 (Access and Circulation) 18.120.180 (Public Transit), 18.120.180.12, (Parking) 18.120.180.13, (Drainage) 18.120.180.15, (Provision for the Handicapped) 18.120.180.16, (Signs) 18.120.180.17 and are therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. This proposal does contain elements related to Sections 18.120.180.2 (Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment), 18.120.180.4 (Buffering and Screening), 18.120.180.10 (Crime Prevention and Safety), 18.120.180.14 (Landscaping); and are reviewed elsewhere within this report. The underlying provisions of the General Commercial Zoning District are also reviewed elsewhere within this staff report. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 provides the following criteria for review of new developments compatibility with the environment: a. Buildings shall be: (i) Located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage; (ii) Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; (iii) Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire fighting; and (iv) Oriented with consideration for sun and wind; and STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 4 b. Trees having a six inch caliper or greater shall be preserved or replaced b 9 P 9 P P by new plantings of equal character Section "a" is not applicable as no buildings are proposed to be developed. The application addresses the requirements of Section "b ". The applicant does not propose to remove trees through the development of the lease hold area. Existing trees will be used to partially screen the proposed monopole from view. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses: Section 18.120.180.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The applicant has provided a mixture of screening and buffering materials to screen the ground mounted equipment. Due to its 80 -foot height and for communication purposes, it is not possible to screen the entire facility and still allow the necessary clear line of site to the antennae structure. Any plantings at a height of 80 -feet would necessitate greater height for the proposed antennae. The monopole itself has been designed to be as unobtrusive as possible given the antennas height requirements. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on -site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to screen ground mounted equipment through the use of a seven - foot -tall slatted chain link fencing and new landscape plantings along the north and south sides of the proposed leasehold area. Other existing trees around the perimeter of the site will partially screen this facility. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department reviewed this application and had no comments or concerns with this development as proposed. Landscaping: Section 18.120.180.14 provides the following standards for the provision of landscaping: a. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.100. b. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections 5 and 6 above, a minimum of 20 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped; and c. A minimum of 15 percent of the gross site area shall be landscaped; The applicants compliance with the requirements set forth in Section "a" is reviewed elsewhere within this report. Section "b" is found to be inapplicable to the proposal because these sections refer to privacy, noise, glare and outdoor common areas that are all unaffected by this proposal. A minimum of 15% of the overall existing site area is presently landscaped. A minimum of 15% of the proposed leasehold area is to be landscaped. The proposed new landscaping is for areas that are not currently landscaped. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 5 Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval g g pp oval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The use, as proposed, complies with all site development standards set forth for the General Commercial Zoning District. The property is physically separated from existing residential development due to its location. Fencing, landscaping, and existing trees will partially screen the proposed monopole and fully screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The applicant has not requested that public facilities be made available to serve this development as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met by this proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. The use is defined as a Minor Impact Utility due to the type of proposed facility. The location criteria for a Minor Impact Utility is that the site have access to a minimum of a Minor Collector Street. The site is proposed to be provided with an access easement to a commercial driveway that provides direct access to SW Pacific Highway, a designated Arterial Street. Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will not generate substantial traffic, light, or other impacts as the facility would be an unstaffed communications antennae. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements that are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. The applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact of the antenna. The antenna is described in the applicant's submittal as being a galvanized metal pole with antennas which are not expected to draw attention to the structure. STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 6 • • No other unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The small leased area requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use, leaving remaining underdeveloped portions of the property for future redevelopment. The specific development criteria of the Comprehensive Plan that addresses the development of this type of utility facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code. The applicable development standards are addressed within this report. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the applicant has also not proposed to extend other utility services to the site, no conditions have been recommended conceming the provision of public utilities. The Building Department has reviewed this request and provided the following comment: A Building Permit is required for all fences, towers, and walls in excess of six feet in height. No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS No other comments or objections have been received. • 4 :7 1 4 , 1 , j q November 27. 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner `^� 1 November 26. 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdo DATE Planning Manager STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0009 - AIR TOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Page 7 • • i t ■ • a. • Mu OM We / / 1 , WOW( . so Lij \ • % / / b I r 2 r % i! .. 4 Q P C QM WOO wurnm I --41 _tee. 1 . = .00. ._ e .A. 4� % / / / // (3 • •tiltr 74217 o'-' ".c c • 1 - 1 I / NUR MID for t I CC so 1 no, / / MUM - o t Z nu for 1 �y�r • . * . - o® 0M I I ■ - ` tot . ,. _-� I _ . . II y N , a ,,, // I anwar . Cr =1 1 �1 1 = TAN wr I \ / � VI z. I � � � / I a I Al 1 1 d cc a x Yoe I mx100t.or �% D ao+� li iiiiiirli c. / / / /ll . „At mrtrso yy N Lei T �ow�cntr su�aary �nw oun owxlwr — — — _ - - ....._ - 4._ .....„-___--_,N.__L_ ft._ "ks• 4 LI " STATE HIGHWAY 99W i (PACIFIC HIGHWAY) ? i , Ixx. L.L. ■■■■■■ __t CIRO 0 >- 0 PLOT PLAN '1 CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP , y Air Touch Cellular Monopole I I CUP 96 -0009 co ___ , c PIP* 6 iii . . ,.,. *.... _ ' .1 11 / 1 " Cf 7 ‘ * /„ % / / At . .c ** ea* )1, • Aa°, ■ • • ' "' *4 4. 4'1.4 im p. 'e 444.. / ,. , #, 41 � � o ..s.- su:� a , f4*. P' 4 , . ao *, - : ,,,, - I T \*.k.••• , , Il ia, N ,. , -.4v. ,-,-,-.. -2 m f ' ( imp 11: i o %1 „A". v ...,_.0- 4P t A tdiv , * , $v, : P!‘"S I v 'S* v � tl � A cur 96-000 nura�n ceuwar Monopole • • CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 9.1996 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: • FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0009 FILE TITLE: AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE APPLICANT: W & H Pacific, Inc. OWNER: Estate of Rosemarie Emery Attn: Chris Eaton 1360 SW Woodward Way 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Portland, OR 97225 Beaverton, OR 97008 -7120 REQUEST > The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 60 -foot tall monopole tower with antennae and equipment cabinet on an existing commercial site. LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 02BD, Tax Lot 02600. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.120, and 18.130. ZONE: General Commercial (C -G). The purpose of the C -G zoning district is to provide sites for a wide range of goods and services. Utilities are also permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639 -4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684- 2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CUP 96-0009 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 12/9/96 PUBLIC HEARING • ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER NOVEMBER 18. 1996, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE —NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY -FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY —FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS AT (503) 639 -4171, TIGARD CITY HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. -� L J i ♦ ` • />, S • **` '#?k • sn A., low .11 MK W s r r 40.t os$,, $ CUP 96 -0009 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 12/9/96 PUBLIC HEARING RECEIVED PLANNING v� NOV 25199 I ,Li 0 iii CITY OF TIGARD S(rapinfly! Better Community REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: November 6,1996 TO: John Roy, Operations Property Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts [x3111 Phone: (5031639 -4111 Fax: (5031684-1297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUPI 96 -0009 ➢ AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Q The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 60 -foot tall monopole tower with antennae and equipment cabinet on an existing commercial site. LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 02BD, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General Commercial (C -G). The purpose of the C -G zoning district is to provide sites for a wide range of goods and services. Utilities are also permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.120, and 18.130. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - November 18. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLWE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: V We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V 1 (Tkase provide tke focrowing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): CUP 96 -0009 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS �,e J • 54 1j 2-7 j 1 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RE IVED PLANNIN r8ettercommunity DATE: November 6,1996 0 V 1 8 1996 TO: Brian Roger, Development Review Engineer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts 1x3171 Phone: (5031639 ax: (5031 6844291 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUPI 96 -0009 ➢ AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 60 -foot tall monopole tower with antennae and equipment cabinet on an existing commercial site. LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 02BD, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General Commercial (C -G). The purpose of the C -G zoning district is to provide sites for a wide range of goods and services. Utilities are also permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.120, and 18.130. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - November 18. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. ..)s, Written comments provided below: 1. N c-D ct-- P 1.. ►JF,�I t4 4) s 1 X11-1 240 u-' . 4G) C — QvAtA'z Ns[ P S. [.b SI 4M(F1<,t rf — tMPAc.T . 4. . v (Please provide the foffawing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: (� Phone Number(s): 310 CUP 96 -0009 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • READ PLANNING /oesot NOV 0 6 1996 � F. CITY OF TIGARD Shaping il (BetterCommrnity REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: November 6,1996 TO: Development Services Technicians FROM: City of Tigard Planning Dhlision STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x3111 Phone: [5031 639 -4111 Fax: (5031684 -1291 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUM 96 -0009 ➢ AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE < The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 60 -foot tall monopole tower with antennae and equipment cabinet on an existing commercial site. LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 02BD, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General Commercial (C -G). The purpose of the C -G zoning district is to provide sites for a wide range of goods and services. Utilities are also permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.120, and 18.130. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - November 18. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the abovq date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: a414/(414- fVt .:�7 GttQ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. 74i°1 /77 Please contact of our office. -I / mQ 11/27-'ea ). j Q Please refer to the enclosed letter. et, u Written comments provided below: / 1 V'j D� . 1 loo osE TOT* APIS. 5r TOO Litt\ ' gem,- v (T1 ase provide tfefoffowing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): CUP 96 -0009 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE PROPOSALIREQUEST FOR COMMENTS •EIVED PLANNING NOV 0 719'x„ i r ii11 _ J CITY OF TIGARD Shaping ./1 (Better Community REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: November 6,1996 TO: David Scott, Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x311) P11011e: (5031 -4111 Fax: (5031684-7291 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUR 96 -0009 ➢ AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 60 -foot tall monopole tower with antennae and equipment cabinet on an existing commercial site. LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 02BD, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General Commercial (C -G). The purpose of the C -G zoning district is to provide sites for a wide range of goods and services. Utilities are also permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.120, and 18.130. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - November 18. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the abovq date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: k .‘ -44 s\A‘ 41 ) ''' (Please provide tkefollowing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: �� 5 . I Phone Number(s): k j�� ' I CUP 96 -0009 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REOUEST FOR COMMENTS • RECEIVED PLANNING vI �I • NOV q CITY OF TIGARD NV 1 2 1996 Sfiaping)1 Better Community REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: November 6,1996 TO: Kelley Jennings, Tigard Police Dept Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x3111 Phone: (5031639 -4111 Fax: (5031 684-1291 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT [CUPI 96 -0009 ➢ AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE Q The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 60 -foot tall monopole tower with ' antennae and equipment cabinet on an existing commercial site. LOCATION: 12925 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 02BD, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General Commercial (C -G). The purpose of the C -G zoning district is to provide sites for a wide range of goods and services. Utilities are also permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.42, 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.120, and 18.130. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - November 18. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: v • /Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Comment • g: • I t •� � r I Phone Number(s): 22 1 CUP 96 -0009 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 1 • • ABBREVIATIONS Rev Date Description Eng w stet AWG Anwkan Win Guoge CLG Coiling ID' DETAIL SYMBOL CO Conte e ® 11 - U Original r.» r• 8.n 1 ,w4" 1109 1 CAB Cabinet Adjustable °t4 L 9 - Clrbd mid= ON DETAIL Cu Copper DIA Diameter 9-9-119 Added Mau eru dowor1plke 1109 .o. SECTION PAIR DWG Drawing INT Exterior TIGARD /99 CELLULAR SITE Li, .t . 1 WV �► ME at TIGARD, OREGON m "-'~"' .o. <10 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS NIS Nat to seals SW Shn11ar rn Steel TOC Top of Concrete TOY Top of Masonry TYP Typical s* • '• _ LION Chile.. Othe rbs Noted i fi WWF Welded Win Fabric . "' r- 0 ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLS ` ,. ''r; • Y LEASE AREA DESCRIPTION: 11.4g,'" J�OTES 1 A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED 24 THE NORTHWEST ONE- QUARTER, SECTION $ 0 TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANG 1 WEST W WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, THE QTY OF TIGARD. WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, AND BEING A PORTION OF LOT 37, NORTH O2 FOLLOWS: ADDITION SAID TRACT IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS 1RTOIJCH 1 FCIlOMS TH COMMENCING AT THE WESTERN CORNER OF LOT 37. NOR TIGARDNLLE ADDITION; 0 THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERN UNE OF SAID LOT, NORTH 48, 7.35' EAST. 0 48.24 FEET; I THENCE PERPENDICULAR TO SAID UNE, SOUTH 43•2'25' EAST, 15.00 FEET TO 0 THE TRUE PANT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 43'42'25' EAST, 35.00 FEET, Cellul O THD4C1 PARALLEL WTH SAID UNE• SOUTH 46,7'35' WEST. .35.00 FEET; THENCE PERPENDICULAR TO SAID UNE. NORTH 4342 WEST, .35.00 FELT; 7 THENCE PARALLEL WITH SAID UNE; NORTH 467725 EAST, .35.00 EET O 5.00 F TO THE (FORMERLY USWEST CELLULAR) 0 TRUE PONT OF BEGINNING; 1 SAID TRACT CONTAINS 1,225 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. Q BEARINGS BASTED ON THE OREGON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, • NORTH ZONE 10 = LEGAL DESCRIPTION SITE OWNER: SITE ADDRESS: Rosemarie Emery, 12925 S.W. Pacific Hwy. • 12925 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, Oregon Ti TITLE SHEET Tigard. Oregon C1 SITE PLAN 1 ZONING: OCCUPANCY: C — Al DETAILED SITE PLAN - a - A2 ELEVATIONS • CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V —N Ll LANDSCAPING PLAN METZGER j PORTLAND APPLICANT• • AREA CALCULATIONS: OVERALL PARCEL • LEASED PARC :FL, • Total Ana 38,551 t 100* 1,225 agit 100* AlrTouch Cellular rq Area wet egft 188 240 soft 208 � SHEET INDEX Paved Area 20.885 .qft 547E 0 egft 0* 24 1 5575 S.W. Sequoia Ave. Total impervious Area 28,823 egft 707E 240 soft 20* Portland, OR 97224 Told Landscaped Ana 9.043 .gR 2371 0 .qft OR GREIN9URG OFFICE: 503 603 - 3991 Net Landscaped area es 300 soft lox INC. 1 p FAX: 503- 603 -3377 A OF PROPOSED CALCULATED CONCLUSION TRANSWORLD CONSORTIUM, ' .. OUTSIDE OF LEASED O v 4 b amp ncARD . , LAKE OSWEGO DESIGN /BUILD o a` 110 4"'e19e 4 sit. I. unstaffed and normally unoccupied. \ ►�L6E w ADA COMPLIANCE: CONTRACTOR BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE PROJECT: CELL_ CORD COMMUNICATIONS INC. �j�� documents. _ • the SITE 7160 S.W. FIR LOOP, S 102 A mobile telephone transmission/receiving alts for A I R T 0 U t H • PORTLAND OREGON 97223 NR TOUCH Cellular. conflating d an unoccupied radio ^ OFFICE: F 503 - 598 - 0800 p�ep�ent pho txdkinq antsnnoe an (n) monopole, Cdll11� FAX: 503 - 598 - 0700 f.r,cirq.M p°^J+w. eat and tN e n e u t t eonneNone. ae of wtl h A be cone al the site. 19979 00 Mgr& P 1108-409-41182 1 DIRECTIONS FROM TIGARD/TUALATIN AREA: '� s 117T114 sos-so -0000 be LAND SURVEYOR: TIGARD /99 CELLULAR SITE Go SOUTH on 1 -5 to Hwy. 217. 12925 SW F eane1eay Go WEST on Hwy. 217 approx. .5 miles to 99W (Pacific Hwy.). W &H PACIFIC INC. - TIGARD, OREGON Go SOUTH on Hwy. 99W approx. 2 miles to 12925 Pacific Hwy. 8405 SW NIMBUS AVE. MU sNlET 1 Site is located on the WEST aide of Hwy. 99W, SOUTH if BEAVERTON. OR 97008 ob' own er pat. Walnut et. / \ TM Nttacta Na tISti1P -00x A0001.01 CE uLaa PROW 110: 17/3/07063 = VICINITY MAP N.T.S. '�© = PROJECT TEAM = PROJECT SUMMARY = A PPROVALS T1 1 - 1 0 • Rev Date DeeaApflon Ew I TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING ACCESS/UTIUTY EASEMENT / �P } ti � { / /� C ® 7-_�� orOriginal haus ~` e11.nt nrrt.v 11D11 / 1 ry 0 '9 m 7 -11-94 New Now area beaROn 8011 LEASED PREMISES 16.12 POINT EGINNING 2'25�E . �� � t G Q . / ` �r g / ■ � �9` ! ® 7 -111-94 CIMeat «n.e lease 11011 . /� ti 4, / � / / � I. c� ` �/ m o t o `ST ® 7 -22-.. .. / Pie { 4 • . ry � cP j r / � � cp y �4 0 / FT m 7 - > «. t- .,..� .o.., .a e b?' 0� 4 s / \ \ Q f �' , / . ® 11-:11-« a«to.1 MOO / 9. \ ® 11 - 11 -94 raaP«.1«w awmr+a 110. I IPA (PA i 7 s 9418 23'28'W WALNUT \ y Q 7.c�` 4200' ,' DELI-MART PINE . / ® ►-24-94 ra«p•eaw n" S"q NA 'rj, N469 7'35'E / J : .). � 4 10.00' �� / o\ / , 1 ?` r•Jr• Y .� { 1' LAWN \ ,`� ♦ Ap / S56 41'43'W 5/8' RON R00� `� / 1 / APARTMENT ' 127.19' ELEV• 1952 ` `` / / / / 7" ( POIN T OF COMMENCEMENT BUILDING I / �` \ MIES LEASED PREMISES AND � / ' ` • ' \ `� \ I O 1 AGCESS/UnUTY EASEMENT 1 { ' \ 1 ` p � _ rLO ,� 0 1,�0 r ',;''s s • \ `, �`. A/C ASIRO / / / //r---- \ W QY � I 9 ;�, ;\ r �` PARKING \ GAS STATION / / O LEASED PREMISES DETAIL , �ti r' . ) :(c., / CF, LAWN . ` \'‘,"\,%:.1,, v 0, 0 , \ j / ' 2 , �0 �, a �� SCALE 1' 30' Q` 9� +��� i`" �' .�. 9 7.47'04'E` . ,cpf yp4' o \ / O �If° ,c..' .i; �� :i \ �' 9 W A.- / / /' / / 3 DECIDUOUS TREE LINE /� rir - �+� t' ^ �g, ` +L. �? P O 2 TOP ELEV. 224' i - 5 y' > X 4` .� E` CP ' / 4 4' . fi ` r 1 0ti ` ' '� .` \. `. .' j / TOP ELEV. 258' .I1. O / / / 1 / �\ .13.,- 20' ACCESS/ /' O . .. °r , / A/C �; A/C .� UTILITY EASEMENT ' ''' / ' O PARKING. �'': � / / ` PARKING ` + ( - ` -� pr °' • % i , v �`.` BRASS / 'fa' / / 6 1 N) AIRTOLJCN ` e ; � =° �� v QC /'9 : i . SCREW / LA / O \ \ SSE DWG. Al I �O,. �� • AILED AILED : % / { ry6� / " �� ,.- r � � - \ i ' O ■ 1 APARTMENT PN 1 • AR i ^ �` / ✓ •` ' g V ` ^" ' � i ' a" ISc 4‘, �` `� / , / 7 1 \ I BUILDING g' . ![_ •''4 ! \- v ` / O ,y' w / 004 f�GAWN . ; i , � \ \�� \ I'. ' .. k1ti 6 `F g • ' OWER POLE /898 / / 8 0 ,�0 + 3ti• /\ °� 1 . y / 0 . I / 1c9 . o�CP- • 0 \ _': ‘/� o� C� / f o V, k� y . OFFICE j �` �fti / / / • i / \ � \ 6 J , 1 BUILDING A C ' PAVEMENT / 2 1. PRKING WIDTH +/- 55 FT. N. � y' / � PONT 1 LEGEND: I \ \ ` a / b 5/8 IRON R00 �? `� '`� ' `t A GPS CONTROL POINT / / \ � pf 1 { 0 ,` r ` \ 1/ /�k •F, / �� ` � `A'�� / ELEV 194.98' WATER METER ti 0� . la ♦ ,��' P' V`` -O- unuTY POLE I / \ \ \ o� \ � e" . / P { / /, \ G �,�, ��` CATCH BASIN ,y1 / O FOUND 5/8' IRON ROD \ \ \ �•1� ' � °I. 9 (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 1 \ POWER POLE /76 ' Q P , - `� LUMINAIRE TRANSWORLD CONSORTIUM, INC. / \ , COORDINATE UST FOR CE / / NTER OF A. PROPOSED TOWER 1 \ / PROPOSED ANTENNA + \ JOHN L SCOTT \ / / / $AD 83 GEODFTIC COORDINATES A/C ASPHALTIC CONCRETE ��` 110 I \ OFFICE BUILDING / L AnTUDE: 4575'36.001' N UM >o12112 r�JS .te O- a11�1111O \ '6 �������/ BUILDING law Chimes. as 9101111 m O44111-4411-4194 / LONGITUDE: 12246'47.532' W � \ I / \ . / NAD 27 (FODFTIC COORDINATE$ - :.' CONCRETE \ X / LATITUDE: 4525'36.586' N LONGITUDE: 12246'43.181' W - s =g - - CONTOUR \ / ' '�s JIA0 8.3 STATE PLANE COORDINATES / NORTHING: 649,908.70 SI FT EDGE OF PAVEMENT A I RR __ T '''' O u t H \ / ' / / FASTING: 7,616,861.22 9 FT LEASED PREMISES UNE ill / / ELEVA nON AT BASE OF \�� V/ WIG IN / TOWER 1929' x FENCE leers Sequoia 7eaby 11011 11011-11011-111101 t \ a rnw 601-1/06-41171 r. / / TIGARD /99 CELLULAR SITE / / / / SCALE TT o ' ' / 25 50 100 9,c PLAN PLAN , I // y © TUC PROJECT 110.: usoP -oax SITE PLAN , ' , / / ( PROJECT 17131971M ,7t�,.) 0 SCALE: 1 , / / SCALE 1' -50' WHEN PLOTTED ON 11x17 smelt Ns. C1 • 1 0 • - - 74001, Rev Date D..erlpRon i lit. / ® II-14-96 Orl�rd Woo M r/�1 n PLO 1 1 ` � .,, r / / ' , m 6-29-1111 Clerical r.Y1/ao • i I • /•�, - - ,� r #./ - 4 ' '•.i- ,/ / ® 1-11-96 rrareraw rplanner ..wma+sr OA ' - e / Lt .-29-96 rn..wrd.. WWI MO 1 i' i i • ' - — // • / - j i r" /ice _. / DECIDUOUS TREE LINE /'. /., ;, % •,, ' `'` f} / � TOP ELEV. 224' i -:\ ...,\ s .r - % ' / r /" / / i / i Ij �" / NOTE$ O TOWER BASE % ,' - / V ''� (E) CURB 1 ELEVATION + 192' -9" j / ,s 1 1 / / 0 0 EDGE OF TREE % , • l 200 sq. ft. / Q CANOPY .. : 1111 i I ‘ , ` 4 ' 7' CI-LAINLINK FENCE s 1 \ / � " � I `�` T' 3 STRANDS OF BARBED i' Q • 1 WIRE to H SIGHT OBSCURRNVGi 1. _ :',. SLATS O 1 APARTMENT O' / . __ - -- h , i` / / BUILDING / / + 1 / j ,, 6 MONOPOLE `, CUT URB / i ' ' ,/,A <' ' (N) 1 2' / to }, �. . , GATE / / ,---• / '"•• ,.._--- eik. ; ,.. i y O p y °,, "0 ; • .... " . I,;;.,,, (E) CURB / :i::: ; N 12X .,.,,: G �, i r ' � i :, iE j' i I �, \ 24 PI NE � ;.t ,; AIRTOUCH .:,: ,, ! +,;;,, / 5 �,'� � J Q � TD' ELEV. 258' - -J �� : QUIP: SHELTER I' Q U: !11!1'!j V (E) RETAINING - ` a„ i , ,,:, WALL lir (� Q` p / ` Y ,. : � i ■ r:iE:j,:i j' ,•t •.,.,, , ,, ,, , -\,) ,... ,Y2" AND 16" DECIDUOUS , '� ,' . ;� • 11 j ., ; , ; . h i; i ; ,, � ,; 1.! . { ' :; ' ; ; , '' "' ;;;' ", (N) OSCAPING TRANSWORLD CONSORTIUM INC. TOP ELEV. 260 .� -s /i : j;;: , I;ir' .,, .� , i ;; t!' ° , ill;,.I 175 s. ft. - '--- --, ; �J %' � , '1 !J ' : ! Ei' ' �� �L7 IA 14 FIR , \ J - _._._._..._ t.. r Olt 91 919 - +� I / TOP ELEV.. 244' -- _ �. lake Omer. ~'' Olt n�o96 ea 900-11111-11100 • • / \ i � ,\ , , WN J d ;'�' AIRTOUCH I d Cellular 0•111111•1 NMI AIWA GA O r y t / \ r� . � OR '.. y ` S CALE 9� STIT ( 5' � ''\� � 14 DECIDUOUS % ' . TIGARD/9 - j OREGON TOP ELEV. 219' 0 5 10 20 � t . El COAm run � � O F FI C E IN IN =ter TIC LED s "OJECT "C.` uaw -amc DETAILED SITE PLAN BLDG. C SW 1713197063 O DETAILED r.1a SCALE -10' IF PLOTTED ON 11x17 g,..1 w. A l • ! _. ...... . . ..r/..-..-. ..1.1 1."': I 41 0 . . ; • . ... • . " • --. / - "., ' Rev Date Description Eng - \... i 1 .., -- •\ ' / , . \ • ( '.., ! ! . //' A,. / / . //' .- / AS, 9-10-98 OrIgIne0 how for aged ,w.,., OA 1 .-1. • ''' \ ; / . ,,.. "-. i ' * r / ■V . i ., /-- f I \ '''.:', :-." i „ , • ' ./i. ..•-• ...- , / / & 11-28-96 Corlool rovlokof ROO \ , V / • - , - . .- - . . ' --- / . , i . / & 9-9-90 Incorporator planner omornordo 11011 i' \ j. i ... .: • i , , .// & 11-27-110 Insorporoko ram 1111.7111f 109 • • I f .--/ ; / 4: . .,-,' / ./,. . / :, .....,.., /1; r• ....--- ..• / ''' ...-/ . .... . ' ' ' . / . z i.- '. ./ ,....' .... ' r , / .., ,." / \ "...,,-- . , / , I /-. • . /.. //, ,c.,- ., '' A\ • .. . - . . //..., - .,-/ ..„ ., ,- ,./. t.„. ,. . • .. ,-, , ‘.. , . .... ,.. ,./ ...., ....„..,. ....\ /- / , ........... ) ., .,...,. _/ DECti T RE E. i_i NE -'- / -.. N ' ,..i.- .:,--.:,. .. -.-- ,", : • „s /,./., ., / . '7,, .. ,,/ .., 1 TOP E ..I.EV. 22 •;'-' / / .-/ ,--. ---1 ,-' ., ; .,-- 1 . „..., / . ,:, .....- , t / / ..--i , ,- ,/ .. ,,/,.,>:/. , . .. ' NOTES ; ss. L ," ' , / ? - ,r.R 13/1.3E. ,..+. / ' / ..? / 1'.; ,./. ' ./ ' ." .- , 0 1 , < A/ i / / ' I i j \ / EE'v 4 ic.);•! ! •2' --- 9' // / 4 9 i . , , • -.. /I r-•• / •-`: / '••;;Q--- - 1 (.,0-:- ••. / , / , i /- • / / ., •,,,,,' .. z •.• ...-, / — ., / e / • v‘,....„- „. ,.. , .., , I , , il : . i ••• , , E ,-.,- 1 OTT- ;... , ...;:_n.... .../. , : • ,...t... /. , , / „ / r\ < „ •,-- -,,,,,- .,,..,„ ._. . .... -,.. .„, • , / , , .,. i i r.,..41-J( '• ., ,/ .- - - \ ./.. ,, • .. (..) 1 ; -. N ! , . / ..% / .;' ' '..:' : ',. ! • 4\ . ./. , \ HA,g ., 7:/ / . . W;i18,5 SIANi.)...5 / 0 i , \ • 1 . / r , '`--- i --. ! #•/' , \...\-.., (.:•,-,.,, 7 - ;;;C:;" - i 'PR/ir / / i ! \ . ‘,.--• I 404' . ''',- "R. ..'4-.. ).!,..E. •1‘ , ...;;;.....• i....t..1 SLATS 0 . 1 AP API OE NT , ; •• i i / \ • /- - 7 - ,A ' I OP „X.. ‘,7"1 .:/ .- \ '... . , . . /' .- -C • \ \ N \ \ „ , .•. , / . / ,/// / "3:_l•I.D/!-.;;; 1 ‘ / ,, .," • • / • ' / I / / I .- m , • .• • ; P - / 1 ; / x / / \ - \ \ - --- --- .,i/ . / ''I 'A' ' , .,,,/ • '4- ':\• .--- ' •%'' ii i \ '''''.. ••- -..:, \ ; , , i , <e ,_,....,,,,.... / ....i: / - CI .:', , / .., 4i r , , 7 • / ,.' .. _.,, •/ •ii' 4 / CATE /fir i / / y / \ / ? /;-\„/,,,.'! / z / \ / - • / . I ! : ., . ' ,/ / / ."---------- ., / ' ,...,... . ,- ! ./ , , L --- / -/ /1-- ( %,.:,-.•!,,,, y:!-! \., • • 1 •vil.!!! ,--------- /' 4,•.\. 1 / ,):' / _.___ \ •V' / // \., \,;-• , r 1 l\ c---- \ - I i / • 1, , 1 ,.. ,...-, .4: fil,.i.. .,. .,..00111,i.:hr. r" I }` j... 1 / ..c:.,) ...1:r' .:,'..)• „, .4 -■,'; ' t=:-; z e'?'‘`. / . .... ..' • 0- ' / ./ \ .. \ ,.,. . ‹ ..i . , . / / '' - ! -/ 1 1 / „; , I, . , ._ . ,. ... .,/ 1 .--/ .v. ,. ,... t .. \ -.. i. \ ,., • % : N.. (;illiiiilliliii!'llt ..4Z ( .. , ■1':!iiiiitii;jil: . 'N \: : 1 ,1i;, ,. .• ..' , ....• ,-1,i,r 7 < il! C' i ■ \ /: , . . 2.A. 211 Iiiiih - ' / ".. > N / ..:.A.- '7 *- 7 ---- (E) CUR13 A . ... ' // / V t , -' •- • ?..; r• ' , ,‘• /i V •(!:‘ '• 1 . , A. , % . • V; •'" 4 - ; • , ,,.. , •••, , , - \ .'kidii!!)4:1!!!iiii.i . .. ( • •• 1:1iioi! -----7-,\,, '4tep f. „1/4 :-.0,;* : i l ii ii : ii :.:! ,, i ! i i ,, i: : ,, 1 l i ; 1 1 1 , 1 1: ,, ; ii j, l • , i , , i i :: , ,., ..„ , .., - / ..... ,._ . . • ", ! ..4,!, i i:C... c;..1,7: T! C 1;iii!;:il!!//'! , •' / • \ i 1 ) Rf-TritiiNG __ - • I -•:- s.,!lj --; -,' • ;••••1"` (IX ., - ; ,.- --... 1 •••;;;;;. ,...k.. L.:, . ..,, 1....., ,_ , • ; „ , o! , t1 ,.. .„,./, -4,, i., • ;, ,1-.,••;,:::, Vii!tc: .-j;lill!iii;11;!!ililril;1;:ii!!!!' •i!;:iiii;;;!!!X 41,1,7 : ,,-- ,1• .0, ; ,• d ,dil ,,, :14 ;;;; ,;,,f,.:;, ,;; / './.1'. ill 1 3.,--.LL „s. t' I ' ▪ ' / 1 / i / \ kV : ' I■iii;iii1:1,;;!!!! P. ./ EW LANDSCAPING 0375 S.F.) ■.. /, / Ill / • :\ \ N'ill71!;li'illIVIYI;iill!ii!:MY / (15) MED.-SIZE EVERGREEN I / / . k.._ - • '4.; , , /'// \ . - . -.. „ L :: 11 .Li•;.; Ni;ly:■ ..,,, ot•i;ii!1;•;':::1;V. ;• DIAMETER AND HT CH • TRANSWORLD CONSORTIUM, In. , , ,.. :„. ".:4.A,:.ii• ,/ / / ,,, „•-• - - ,. _. I V / • Rhododendron 'Scintillation' - 5 gal. 100 =RR PAIITA.T. pa 1109-106-011011 I ,./ l• , .e '• • 4_, . ..:. / \ \ , -.. * t . ` \ - t.., , .,,"-- ` - =Z4fr ic = 4 1..4 .....1,0,7 / I.A ..i \ \ rr1 , ' • Taxus ' edia 'Densiformis' -, / ' lake Onoogo. OR PION Su acesasines / '-. /-‘, \ . ,---N■ - Ns. ; ' % ''. '; / i ; -. (DENSIFORMIS YEW) - 5 gal. ,....,-, s 's• :--. . • , x. , , • ,/ : , ; • ., / ., i - i .- V-„/ # i , \ • Thuja occidentals - 1 - // .; \. 11110 ,// 1 i i I , ., . (AMERICAN ARBORVITAE) / • 9," ., , I ; I MPS IT llolosIs Portop 111011-000-01111 t 1 "•::-.. DTC:P..i0L _____ ‘') .1_,L .) • i 1 / 4 . ‘ i ) ' / / / ! : ! 1 i I I I ; i I , i 1 i I ; t ii V SCALE PCIROAXIX OR MOM 000-000-401/1 Imo TIGARD/9 9 CELLULAR SITE 12925 5111 Pock% Woo& . 7r;P i 9 i '.,/' %.' ". f ; ■ 1 TIGARD. OREGON 0 5 10 20 LAMOSCAPOICI PLAN 1 DETAILED SITE PLAN ,. • ,,,,t. il / 1 ; ! : lE) . . 3: , i........ ; • I , IN al 1111 MO MEM ....M.1.111...11 (FEL7) TUC PRC1JECT NO.: USOIR-001 AIRTOUCM CELWLJA PROJECT MO.: 1713197053 0 SCALE: r .10' , / i i • ' . SCALE: l'■10' IF PLOTTED ON 11x17 Li 1 - N-. 4 , . ... . • 1 0 0 Rev Date Description FAR I ® S-14-94 Original Mum f r Merl NM.. Rai m 1 -21-11 Clerical notion En it 1-9-91 .r..rpaalw planner ..rrrnwrrl. RE 19 1 1 N ) AIRTOUCH ANTENNAS (4 ANTENNAS ON 60' 1 1 1 - 1.1• AZIMUTH SIDE) - TYP. - _ l 1 111 _ n (E) TREES NOTES BEYOND 1 (TOP ELEV. 224') 01 ALL FENCING SHALL BE SIGHT OBSCURRING (SLATS). 0 1 0 1 (N) 80' MONOPOLE - TYP. 0 I . I (N) AIRTOUCH ANTENNAS - - -' —^ N (4 ANTENNAS ON EACH OF �] ' •,•I•i = — 0 b 2 SIDES - 180' AND 240' I 11 11 UII u 1I _ AZIMUTHS) - TYP. - 0 0 1 (N) 12'x24' AIRTOUCH 10 EQUIPMENT SHELTER - TYP. 1 ;4- _ (N) ICEBRIDGE AND Nr o ICEBRIDGE SUPPORTS - TYP. I (N) 7' CHAINLINK FENCE I II WITH 3 STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE I 1 I AND SIGHT OBSCURING SLATS - TYP. 1 u1 • : ' i . i iii ii/ /� 1 1RRl. t� . .. ��� // /i // / ii/ /ii / / / /�// /ii / s /% % % / I %/ / . // / J / /� /i /� /ii // /Z // z 1 , , 31 1-- -12 --I- -6 12' 1- -I 8' -- . 17' 33' I- 8' 12' 6' --12 J -.-3' I I- 20' -I i TRANSWORLD CONSORTIUM, INC. 33 33 � 33 •+ Z. I � Z• I I /If =I' (LOOMS S.c.) as 1 t lQ µR 11011-4111-0109 I*-li 0 Lb da•.r. as 11TORf RQ 11011-411941110 SCIIE 1/1r =1' 00010 K S.E. ELEVATION © N.E. ELEVATION © N.W. ELEVATION 0 S.W. ELEVATION (1r.) SCALE: 1 /tr =1' 0.00/014 £W.) SCAM SCAM 1 /tr =t' (LOOMS n.c) 1 AIRTOUCH" Cellular I PORT. A `pale l efc.v 9011-1011-411101 t�1m� a ttRN 9011∎1o.-NR►f R. SCALE TIGARD /99 CELLULAR SITE 0 8 16 32 1 a' p°°"` I''"�' IN _ TIGARD, OREGON 1 = NB 1sr w3lolls TNC PROJECT 10.: USAfil-00X IN 1/16" =1 `I PLOTTED ON 11x17 aal0lull CELLULAR PROECT ICJ 171319 053 Sheet Mo. A2 i,.„........ / / , ,/ • 0 ' 7 / i :: .....\ Rev Date Description Eng / -,- f / / 6 -2 / 4 8-14-94 OrIgMol lease fes dant mains ROI . / V : ...:- ...„ . / • . • •-• --- ." • , e-26-S$ -26-S$ Oseka re on l stsl ROO Z / s /...4. \ :::; - 3 . ...' \ / ,. ,.. ... .... . : .' .. V / & 11-11-1111 Incorporates simmer carnments ROB . / • • . . . . / & 1511-13 Incarposales any survey MI 5 7 :. --• . ./ V / A, 10-22-114.Added witty easement PIM / ' , . ""' / •••'•:S. K ... ••• /* / V / ....". / .. :1 / / / 11-2S- A6, 14 Roved ge at nos -- / / y DECIDUOUS TREE LINE / e / ../ ) y / ./ TOP ELEV. 224' .f •,.- /,‘,„ ,.....'; / , / ' , - ., / / -- / ,-. NOTES / e ,•• '. --' / i / ...• / ..../ 0 ELEVATION +192'-9" // / / • / ‹ ; 7 A ` (E) CURB / / „. / „ ....,..... . V • / / • 0 : 1 / e / .-- / 0 --.• -- A .... ,. (N) IANIACAPI \ . / EDGE OF TREE / / --- :( '' CANOPY /// / / / .•• • ..,-, i -..\\ /- 200 'lit. / 0 / / 111 / :-...--- - , . -- / 0 /' ..,.e.' i .1s / N. 7' CHAINLINK FENCE .., -; i 4.:-.-. ■ / ,." / lik ../.:. e \ / TN 3 STRANDS OF BARBED - 0 , : :..' / WIREVI SIGHT OBSCUR9J‘G,' / I\ ' ..,..):..,,,, ' SLATS ; / 0 / .. APARTMENT ...0 \ / ; c BUILDING /74‹ '...`-'''. • .9. . / 80\ ; • / (N) URB i r = . co ‘ A A MONOPOLE CUT / ..... e ; ..., / CI c_ . , / ; ,..11 / sp \ Q o4 . , cn c o / #' 1 / . . . " 13 4 ,-- - . ....., .... (110 e s ..... , (N) 2' // ,__. ' s, ,1 . ; ... .,q::::: cs.. A A ci / / ... 4 ns \ GATE ( . = ./ (E) CURB ,.. / "..- n ..:ii;In!!:::::::::::?Iy....).' TOUCH A, . , / ro PINE .•, i i • .:IiiiIi ...... AIR - 1 1 -1:. e 11V . / ' „ / TQFC ELEV. 258' • \,!) ,-----:: -...\---,..... `,, % SHELTER:4:: 11, (E) RETAINING . :., , 1 ; . • en OCI-c)01 ';'s • *. % , '...:::::1:::::::::::::::::::::P101:::::- WALL AND 1r DECIDUOUS • / ./ •*; ,.. ).-. .... ..-:::::::::::::is :::::::::::::::::::- / i / TOP ELEV. 260' .\? '`-----,../----.' ,-. •. e • tn ti % .:::: -;;K;;;:::-.3,1::::::::::::;:::• • / . : • : - ' .. I N) ' DSCAPING - : .., ":::::::?i:'::::::1Viiii TRANSWORLD CONSORTIUM. INC. -. 1 / \ \.,/ i ‘9. 175 s• ft. .;:. ti \ ..'.. 0 ! / KO 10152 PROOTAY. I lake Oswego. Oft 07035 01:0-430-31011 tax 603-130-311111 AT' 1 5 / 14" FIR • i -...._ ...... r •-• ..," ft I CV / ,-----' ....... ''''. i '5 , % : 0 .WN / TOP ELEV. 244' : f ,. \4 sek / :4; - a / i •• i / e . • <::.:.. cu / • / \-::'..., ; = PVC 6 ,', • . \ ! 4 AIRTOUCH I • = / (N) # .• - 3" TELCON0DUIT - Cellubx C.3 ,..acJ4.9S) -•-• I : CC • / N - •CE IMPS SR Iterwle ParThel 803-403-14.111 cn AO' -kr UNDERG oo , 7-- 11 : l ii V PORTIARD. OR Wflas 1103-30-11177 fax ,--4 C . i TIGARD/99 CELLULAR SITE . .....- . 14" DECIDUOUS ,- .. 1 ILL.,..-, : SCALE -- ..; : 12973 Af Poerc Ifghway cn TOP ELEV. 219' 1 i ) : 0 5 10 20 TIGARD. OREGON 1— I I i (E) OCULECI 91E PLAN 5..: : M ON C3 ‘s. , ,...,. I ' OFFICE so El ■ ■INI■Nom nic PROJECT 603-: usirt-ow DETAILED SITE PLAN - (N) 3" PVC POWER CONDUIT .\ BLDG 46 1 1 (FEET) MRTOLICR CELLULAR PROJECT fez 1,1131970S3 cc BLDG. ..-- sulk. rwr UNDERGROUND 1 k SCALE: l'■10' IF PLOTTED ON 11:17 A 1 9wet Tio. Li • ‘‘ ., . 4 I I O. .....,_ _ _ __ ._. _. _ _ _ 1111 • 0 Rev Ws Dsserlpfon Eng • ® 1 -i4 -Is OApkwt Yews kw earl rwlw ROI . © 6 -26-96 Cwtool revision nos hS , 9 -9 -96 Moe.perviss planner eerrrnenb MI ® 10 -26-96 CJsrkd revision nos (N) AIRTOUCH ANTENNAS n 17 ON EACH OF nn 2 SIDES - 180' AND 300' I II 11 11111 l 1 t 1 _ - ll 1 j ij ij ll U AZIMUTHS) - TYP. J U II 111111 fi �, _ . (E) TREES �J NOTES BEYOND 0 ALL F RwC ) E SIGHT (TOP ELEV. 224') 0 0 (N) 80' MONOPOLE - TYP. O 0 (N) AIRTOUCH ANTENNAS O • a• ' (4 ANTENNAS ON 60' ' t •fl C °p _ CO • • • AZIMUTH SIDE) - TYP. - - - I I I I I' Qa • U O D 4-3 _ (N) 12'x24' AIRTOUCH D N EQUIPMENT SHELTER - TYP. U \ (N) ICEBRIDGE AND - o ICEBRIDGE SUPPORTS - DP. 3 (N) 7' CHAINLINK FENCE c WITH 3 STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE _'' AND SIGHT OBSCURING SLATS - TYP. _ � ®.i.i■ _ ■iii■ . to • '• • • 7 1 "1 1 • • . r 1..• 1 • v••••• • ows mm Raw f47.-:a • cn o ivi 3' 1-12' 18' 8 1 20' —1-5 18' 1 12 --1 3' 5'-1- 20'' -1. 8' TRANSWORLD CONSORTIUM. INC. . 1 D 33 33' 33' 33 ,•. ��� cu 100 I PARKWAY. /16 000 -920 -0109 C11 02211 lake Orme. OR MOO 6u 600 - 631 -7l16 0 0 S.E. ELEVATION 0 N.E. ELEVATION 0 N.W. ELEVATION 0 S.W. ELEVATION Z :::; : sm.& 1 /sew (.001076 Kra SCALE: 1/ir.l' (LOOM S.W.) SCALE 1/ir.r exam 3.0 SAM 1/ir.I' (100A714 NZ) „ 3 AIRTOUCH' > Cellular IyJ 6evr�r ee er�nl J l.l.l - 16676 N c. Partway 600 - 9 7, CT U-1 Ol fr66/ 667 -66)- ha cn SCALE TIGARD /99 CELLULAR SITE i Q , 0 8 16 32 u923 s' poorre _ TIGARD. OREGON NI No Nom ■Nommomm an...ma i O • SCALE: 1/16 =1 `IF PLOTTED ON 1 1 :17 MC t> a NO.: CC ARf0UO3 CEUlAAR pRO[CT NO 1717197051 A2 Sheet les. U II .0 • • , D..onofon Eno TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING / ∎• y 406, / /� "! ■ ® -2-00 o.+orr I mo r« ...a r•.,•. RN TRUE POINT /UnUTY EASEMENT OF BEdNNiNG S43 e r 7 / \ ■ PANT 42 Z5 E / I ` LEASED PREMISES 18.12' 4, / mo o. J �' �' G / 40 ® 7 -16-66 Period ..rr..a.. Ra ® 7 -22-66 R.drvrn Rio - p ` m 7 -n-66 lnwpur.N. r+n• ..•w Ra Ai ryk 4 Q 7 �' / / \ � iP yI / \ . ® 6-26-66 CMrbd mrY.r p � If 7 .y ®ajN / , WatxuT 4 / � � ® h:.-.. M«v«..» corny III � N187J' DEL - MART j bow y . N4697'35 4200' \ • / elr ?. -t � 10.00' / ° , ®,6-u ss�ae.. Wally ....n.+ .o. NT :? �. ?;: � y\■ �t S56 41'43 OPS-PO1NT 2 ` ` \ / / BUILDING 127.19' \ 9.E IRON) v 2 r : v v , \ ■ ELEV.- 195,E �° P OI OF COMMENCEMENT ' 1 \ \\ f \ AOCESS LEASED PREMISES AND VOA 0 / \ '� . \ I' / / O1 /UnurY EASEMENT ‘ 1 _•\1 l rI , 'P .i \ s \ \ \ A/C \ ASTRO / ,/ / f r�'� I �� `'; / 'Ly , / �� ', ` \\ PARKING °� GAS STATION \ O O 2 LEASED PREMISES DETAIL $ ► LAWN • � . + \ \ / / SCALE 1 it! .� , --; � , 1' 3,7„,"5.. : \587'47 E • ?�,. ti I / i " / O. DECIDUOUS TREE uNE y j9, ^ -�C . r 9.8 7' \\� 1 \\ . C � 9 ' / ' / / 0 24 PINE �/, J ► / X1 1 /° , / J� , '�� �,\ \ \ \\ ���' 20 ACCESS/ ' / TOP ELEV. d� / /A/C N. \� A/C \ \\ `�,- U71U1Y EASEMENT / / / O li• ����' 0,ii /PARKWCy :� r' PARKING \ t , / -pr li t H Ig i ii ! / / � / r / V 1.. \ \ BRASS ' E4. % AIRIDIX21 r�,a; i )</ APARTMENT / / - /" �9 ' �,"" aM 1 1 2 ' 1 J / Y % BRASS \ DWG. N . ' AILED 44 1 i . i • I ' ' Ora 49 e \\ , �� O ` 1 PLAN I � AREA ' i a ; d 'ij ,; rtbt .. 4,. •- / \ ,:t.. .ay.' 1 \ / BUILDING O VS r �L �1 j) ,, i 'ai y ` j / �� 1. O♦ ` � / / j / / 8 \ ■ 6. o0 04. r0 2 .6 .4,s \ \`\ � / Or- 1 b 1 � k� • M6^ g , • OVER POLE /8983 j ' O d°- •X‘• i \ i �1 / 10 • \ / Id? • of `'r 1 { \ v 1�+ .0.00. � � y \ OFFICE / /� 1, � / / / / / \ \ 1 lUr � ♦ BUILDING PARK NG SIG" `9 V101H 1+%E" 55 F T \ �� \ I r �'/ / POINT 1 LEGEND: \ f .// ti 4 b s /atiRav ROD 0 PPS CONTROL POINT / ({� � ' \ , I ' •F ,,/ � , 0 WATER METER \ / \ A ti��. y , \ ti� P� _ � P / -6- UT1UTY POLE /\\ (� ;�\ : / / C I S; tx �' C)‘‘ / ® CATCH BASIN / `9 \ ' CONDUIT ") J \ \. r / �� G / FOUND s /9' IRON ROO \ \ Q . V /., G\� ? / ` � (UNLESS OTHER NOTED) / / \ ti� \ ' I POWER POLE /76 ' ` (J / = � 1' u,M► "AIRE TxarrsWoRL.D CONSORTIUM, INC. \ \ ® / / J ` / COORDINATE UST FOR CENTER OF ® PROPOSED TONER ' PROPOSED ANTENNA A C ASPHALTIC CONCRETE ,�`u" \44 \ / / MAD 83 I AAFTIC COIIROINATE$ / JOHN L SCOTT \ , LATITUDE: 457636.001' N '/ 100I= eamar, /u 406-416-0106 \ OFFICE BERM; 3a, / LONGITUDE 12Z'46'47.s32' W ' / / / / / /// BUILDING Las Ono" OR man - Ra 666-410.01 • \ I I1 / D 27 WOOFTIC COORDINATES - - - CONCRETE / / \ . MA LATITUDE: 4575'36.586 N �: , :' `) \ ' ' / / LONGITUDE: 12Z46'43.181' W - t98 - -- - CONTOUR - \ / . / NORTHING` 649,908.70 9 FT EDGE PAVEMENT A IR — u C H \ / " ' / EASTING: 7,616,861.22 9 FT - •-• LEASED PREMISES UNE CCll� / / ELEVATION AT BASE OF f p . " _ \/ . i TOWER .. 192 9 , x — FENCE 1..,s . w So OR Maws; .a- w.�..1 n ra VI a 6 6 0a.- .00 -.e r. , / TIGARD /99 CELLULAR SITE HIghooy / / / , / SCALE 5 SW oiz / / 0 25 50 100 ,, �, SRI / / © MC .Roar w. us,1n-cm SITE PLAN ' " A11701.101 m1uM rROaca,o 1713197053 / , / S CALE• 1' -50' WHEN PLOTTED ON 11x17 scar: Yd0' / , / / Shod No. . , • :- 0 • ‘• • / . / /1/ / .• • \ /... e ss :le ortincw diem mi.. Eng , ?..,.... 0 • , , - , / .. . - , . - - ..:. / \ . / 4, . ..., :::,...; ; ,.... ../ .. / / . . . . '.. . ./ . OS „,••• / / ..../ • , ••■ X. / & 11-211-11S Claim' resides MOS 4/ /. \ •./ / ' / ., .. ''..... / //. z aro sey / ‘-../ / A- , ., , .......• . •••.„ / hs 11-11-111 lacerporates planer cearnents MO / . ; ''. '. . ' ' & 1-27-11 besorporalse ury OS „. ., ' // • ,; .... , .. , , , •'•'•:"*... / . • - ./ / / ..• / & 11 -211-1111 Mond eats OS . / ,%'/' s . .„.... .../ 3," / . • / /7 % .. ./ . ( , ./„. „ , „3/7 '>.• ,) / , ., (••• :;.;:, ,... ....<,.. ./ /./• \ / /. •'• / / ..... . ' / / e . /.. .• , ,-,: ., / ./. iI)r.C,S li...E1 ..g.,/E. ,.<„...,, .„-, / , ....;;•.,,,. 0 ,.. \ , „ ,./,. [ ,....j E v -.?'•?4 ' s ,./ ".„. „.-..1 • / / . ... .. , / ,---• \ : - ..*-- . ,/ , .•-• , •-• „i .../ • \ 1 • / s• P - „," .,/ \ .... ..... .. - / ., . , - „. -. NOTES TO ii?M Fitt.:3(: / , „. . .•'. .. / • ; ./' • \ il : y: :!ft..!;si 1: ; :' .--:-; / 1 ,-.. •••: / V .,./ ,./.....X... fc : !"- . , .... / \ / / •• ..„.... / / /e/ / ,, ,--<• ,. , , , „,.. _... , \ ' .. .., / / ,:// i • y/ - ..,,:vor-7-?-- - 1- ).„.. /: , ........,..„.„....„.. .„.„. ,-. .... / ......... \ „..• • ,., i • \ „/ .,.,..,......//••-_(...\• \ / , . /A ,••• , • EDGE OF 7REE ___., .././// .../:// - - z.' / .........,-, • / ...../ ' • „. i • ....„7 / , / ,s./-'- I% ... / / 0 • \ \.;„::;:>..; .., .1,:-........ .......... , ? t ,....s, /2, . ......,, ,./ \ •: ::1/4::. - • , /. i of / ,......... :::••:Th-,., f:-iY.-e fi pr;f2f.? ' / . \ .. . - ® • t ' 3 4:;•• , '7■.. „ \ : \ ,..., '' ,. ...1 . , • :: \• ) 10 /. 0 .: ' . ' ' • -'3%..f:3.". 1 ' 0 \ ••!.. ... / ) .. ., " APARTMENT • , / '),... 's, -• . ..- LI , \ .. .. • /:„ \ , „ s.:•:,:. ••.„ \V -;,...... . , \ ... •,.. , \ / ; . • ., ,..... ,. .• , -,. : . ,.. ,- 1 :-.;iif-..::.:. / . •-/ ..;,- ....,„ ----- --- - ../.• c ... „ \-....V.. • ---- ',•:, .„..- / • — . • .... • . ,. , -- .......,: /;„,..,.,. i / CI / s5 s, . 4 )c c) i / \ -./..... ..: \ /.../ \ '3; • ?..)-!, / ./ -, ./ .,. e ; 3 c i / / 1, \ / % ' •,:/,,‘, ---/ / - s• ; / .•• 0 i es"' \•-...;:•‘).'s4ip,,,<,,,s „... ....„:,:.... . n .... - ' / • ...,,,,,...,„ , \p.:„:„:„.: .:„ ..„/ .c, , , ... : / rs , - - '..• ( ., . .....•• / ,.., •-• .....; ,........ '—' C.. / \ .s • .• .% .:iiiiiiiiiiiiIiiiiiiiN- :,: •,,,f' 4:. ?.• CM ./7 1 \ CY..? Vz:: /' .... ,,/ / „, . —4,, ,„„ / ,:.." / -•:,;:::::::::D --- "..: :•,,,,,,,.., . ...• „. -s. / 4 • , , .„ 0-....! ...:,:,... / / / , ,,, , • - s.! G.: ... .N. • ....,,i, : %,.■;.' z : :. : : f \ • „„...."; . .... 4 .;% . \ cii /ci : l.. : :....e "... ::; :::•:;Nif•-a; , ..,..■•• f„ , \ , 'e %;,.\ iii:N.ii:ii,:::: ),,,, ...... 1-- ID ' Q-. 0\ C;; ' '''''.., ..?''''. ,"'-. ' :\ ? ..... N . ": ::::::iiHEiy, ...V 1..:c.; .....::- --''' .t'.:.;.::::::::::::::::•:, / 01 ' ,1 •Z‘ ••••.; , •rik: . 1::::i'VH:!:f::::::::iiiH:1::::::0 .... .4V CTI c-Ns /N.'s' ;.? ...?-: • • .+:.::::l'"••:::}1::::D:iiiiii1:::::iliHEiPiii1Mii:.:'s \,.. ,-. <t c,.`;' 4•••" ir2" A:VD = ir r •,"*; ., t• 'ke\ •-• c-.:-.........::::::::1:::::::11:-::;:,::::::::::::::::: • • - - / ...."" ...4. • j "; . \ , - - , : :::::::::::::::4::::::P.•:- ..i•-• i- > .g 3 •-..• --. •••••••:•••••••••••••::f:::-. <:,-.::::::::::1. ..... ? ; fr . NEW LAIVDSCAPING (1375 S.F.) ELEV. 26()' . 's? t / EVERGREEN cn •,... N -J.' / \\•,„ .../ ; 4 • iiiiigtfts1:::::::::::::::::: -.: .4:: ; 41.:,:k4::::ill:::::::::. / ' / .. . TRANSWORLD CONSORTIUM, INC. .• SHRUBS 5' —6 DIAMETER AND HT. . . • ..• - \ --....2 .: . , SUCH\AS: / / , ,,,, .. .................... .0/ 1 0/ 1 r. r a / % ?):. '' ' . r■ . ,,z.'. % ........... I '.: 4j'N /e / • Rhododendron 'Scintillation' — 5 gal. 100 KOS MOO. CIS 003-106-01101 0.1 ,., 4••••• ,... ........ . ... / r•( E.1.1Y, 24-4 ' ,-*, ....-•••Vr" ..... y ....,',... \ Lake Onsga. OS VOX Tea 503-136-311111 > \ X> ,,, : .. .7%. 0 ,' • • . _, f : 4 / \ • Toxus in edio 'Densiformis' .. . .. . .. • , --,.„ / / \ . 4.: • , -..;•• / -..:„. %\ :-: •-•• \,%. .,.. (DENSIFORMIS .YEW) — 5 gal. .,...-,...... ,..... ..., .... i.... . t; / • Thu la occideptolis „ , , / c, .; ,../ -... y st; . ---, ..-- \ / • -,.. y AIRTOUCH' • .... ..., - • . (AMERICAN ARBORVITAE) — 5 o 1 • cn / : ••••• . , = / / Cellular .:x ....,-;,:•:.,q-4 /-, \ , N •,,cy -,?. N • / -. ......- \ 160?5 WS IllopoIa Paring 003-4103-31/11 . PORTIA= OS MU 1100-003-31377 On % f • '.. V i gl , / i .. • '':-. .0' TIGARD/99 CELLULAR SITE - ....., ...--- 14" i..:E'c,`IDUC)!',. '`,:). i 3 1 SCALE 12273 9N PeciTc Tegheroy 0') ... e. / TIGARD, OREGON al TOP 0 5 10 20 1-4 '• . . :•/ LAMOSCAMIG PLAN F— ..., / R..: ../' s. 3•'' '....../ ; II MN Mr / / . Ori....;C.F. i M MO .1.1 1/11111111.1111i TO PROJECT SW usaP-oca DETAILED SITE PLAN cc t.... . , : ,-/i i-%ii,:::; (FEET) mrrouo■ CELLULAR ROOT NM: 1,13197053 I SCALE: 1" ■ 10' IF PLOTTED ON 11x17 ...--"" lb SCAM r.zr •;::,:., : / 1 Seed Na. L 1 Li -..::.. ..z?.:.. • • . I ABBREVIATIONS Rev Date Desortptton Eng d Mersa AWG American Wire Gunge ® AAA AdJuettDN DETAIL SYMBOL ® it-14-116 original issue for awl rev*w RN LG Cabinet 9-211-91 Period e.vtrron NW • `� w :so dd.' le w� oar r.d CONC Concrete .i Cu ..o. DIA Diameter TIGARD/99 CELLULAR SITE ® f-, -,t Added lease one denotation ROe iA _.-iSECTIOH PAIR DIN Drawing ' NV INT tenor MAX Maximum ® , -71-,g Updated Mae area description 1108 MM Minimum m 10- 1H11 CMrloal minion foe A MTR Manufacturer TIGARD OREGON oontrod Q . ➢ WC Not In .cafe INTERIOR ELEVATIONS IDS Sot to srnM SIY Similar sn Steel is TOC Top of Concrete TOM U yp p li��o�f Masonry UON Untas Otherwise Noted -4 V -1 ,e".. s� WWF Welded Win Fabric �`�� s «: ;,, @ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLS ` r LEASE AREA DESCRIPTION: _'S NOTES A TRACT Cr LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST ONE - QUARTER, SECTION 2. O TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST. WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE OTY OF t. TIGARD. WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, AND BEING A PORTION OF LOT 37, NORTH O TIGARDWL E ADDITION. SAID TRACT IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS AIRT TM FOLLOWS COMMENCING AT THE WESTERN CORNER OF LOT 37, NORTH TIGARDWLLE ADDITION: 3 THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERN UNE OF SAID LOT. NORTH 4617'35- EAST. 0 46.24 FEET; THENCE PERPENDICULAR 70 SAID UNE; SOUTH 43•215 EAST, 15.00 FEET TO O THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING, SOUTH 4342'25 EAST. 35.00 FEET; C ellular 0 THENCE PARALLEL WITH SAID UNE. SOUTH 4617'35 WEST, 35.00 FEET; 7 THENCE PERPENDICULAR TO SAID UNE NORTH 43'42'35 WEST, 35.00 FEET, O THENCE PARALLEL WITH SAID UNE, NORTH 461125 EAST, 35.00 FEET TO THE (FORMERLY USWEST CELLULAR) 0 TRUE POINT OF BEGNNIN SAID TRACT CONTAINS 1.225 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. 0 BEARINGS BASED ON THE OREGON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, NORTH ZONE 10 © LEGAL DESCRIPTION SITE OWNER: SITE ADDRESS: Rosemarie Emery, Estate 12925 S.W. Pacific Hwy. 12925 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, Oregon T1 TITLE SHEET Tigard, Oregon C1 SITE PLAN ZONING: C — Al DETAILED SITE PLAN OCCUPANCY: B -4 A2 ELEVATIONS L1 LANDSCAPING PLAN CONSTRUCTION TYPE: v -N METZGER PORTLAND APPLICANT: AREA CALCULATIONS: •OVERALL PARCEI, .LEASED PARCEL Total Area 38 wt ' 16X 240 so 1.225 .q 20 12011 AlrTouch Cellular Building = SHEET INDEX Building Ann 8.138 saa 18>< R >< q Poved Area 20.685 so ft 54X 0 sat 0* 1 o575 S.W. S97224 Ave. To al Landscaped t A 28 23* 2 0 wet 01St TRANSWORLD CONSORTIUM, INC. Portland, 7 OFFICE: 503 - 603 - 3991 Net Landscaped 9,043 area •e300 sat 1911 GREENBURG V FAX: 503- 603 -3377 *AREAS CALCULATED AT CONCUISION OF PROPOSED PROJECT 07:41 ..NEW LANDSCAPING OUTSIDE OF LEASED lin 1. J PARCEL LAKE OSWEGO DESIGN /BUILD ADA COMPUAHCE: ioo mai num. µe 503.435 i.><. Owego. OR ,Ale Liz 003 1136 - ei« Sits M unstaffsd and normy unoccupied. � \ � CONTRACTOR BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE PROJECT: CORD COMMUNICATIONS INC. Without force and effect on the ca+haet documents. SITE 7160 S.W. FIR LOOP, SUITE 102 the preJect may be summarized 01 A 1 R T o u t H f� PORTLAND OREGON 97223 A motd(e telephone unoccupied AIR TOUCH Cellular. Lhg _11__1_- FAX: OFFICE: 1 503- 598 -0800 . ,. twtldirhq antennas on (n) nanopols n , \.rCfl FAX: 503 - 598 -0700 f• w. M w potato& electrical and t connections, an of which et11 ere.far er! enMn11 be consbucted at the sae. Mil IT 11gesia Perim, 0011"e°e-111wi FORM= OR *7001 11011- 11Oe -S3rr !s DIRECTIONS FROM TIGARD/TUALATIN AREA: Go SOUTH on 1 -5 to Hwy. 217. LAND SURVEYOR: TIGARD /99 CELLULAR SITE Hwy. opprox. ( Go WEST on 217 a x. .5 miles to 99W Pacific Hwy.). 12925 SW Poodle Ietay soy ). W✓tH PACIFIC Go SOUTH on Hwy. 99W approx. 2 miles to 12925 Pacific fic Hwy. 8405 SW NIMBUS BUS AVE. TIGARD, OREGON 1IRd s11E>:T Site is located on the W side of Hwy. 99W, SOUTH if BEAVERTON, OR 97008 Property O11er Watnut et NC PROJECT NO: USRP-00x A11n01.101 CELLULAR PROJECT NO.: 1713197063 e VICINITY MAP N.T.S. 'V© = PROJECT TEAM = PROJECT SUMMARY No. T1