ZCA1995-00003
. ~
March 10, 1999
CITY OF TIGARD
Oregon Department of Revenue OREGON !
Cartography Department ° I
955 Center Street
Salem, OR 97310
RE: Formal submittal of the Ordinance and related Exhibits officially
withdrawing properties annexed into the City of Tigard from the
Tigard Water District.
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter serves as formal notice that certain properties annexed into the
City of Tigard have now been officially withdrawn from the Tigard Water
District. Enclosed is a copy of the signed Ordinance passed by the Tigard
City Council on 2/23/99 withdrawing those properties from the Tigard
Water District. The Department of Revenue previously had the
opportunity to review the "draft" ordinance and the necessary changes
were made at that time to the exhibits prior to adoption by the City
Council.
Thank you for your time on this matter. If you have any questions or
comments, please feel free to contact me at (503) 639-4171 x407.
Sincerely,
. .
;
Julia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner i:\curpln\julia\annex\wdlet2.doc
' Enclosure: City of Tigard Ord. No. 99-05 & Supporting Exhilaits #1-27
C: Tigard Water District Withdrawls from 3/23/98 to 12/31/98 Planning File
1999 Planning correspondence file
City Land use files: ZCA 92-7; 93-2 & 4; 95-1,2,3,4,5,6 and 8; 96-1,3,5 & 6;
97-1,2 & 3; and 98-1,2,3 & 4.
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772
~ ~
~ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ~
ORDINANCE NO. 99- CF5 ~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TIGARD DECLARING THAT PROPERTIES THAT HAVE RECENTLY
BEEN ANNEXED TO THE CITY ARE WITHDRAWN FROM THE TIGARD WATER DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, The City of Tigard withdrew from the Tigard Water District on March 23, 1993; and
VVHEREAS, since that time, the City has annexed certain properties that were within the Tigard Water Dish-ict; and
WHEREAS, property within the Tigard Water District annexed into the City after March 23, 1993, must be withdrawn from
that Water District to insure the proper entity receives the taxes; and WHEREAS, pursuant to ORS 222.520(2), the City is liable to the District for certain debt obligations, however, in this
instance, the District has no debt for the City to assume, therefore, no oprion regarding the assumption of debt needs to be
made; and
WIEREAS, pursuant to ORS 222.524, nodce was given and the City held a public hearing on the issue of withdrawal of
those annexed properties from the Tigard Water District on February 23, 1999; and
~ WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully considered the testimony at the public hearing and determined that withdrawal of
the annexed properties from the Tigard Water District is in the best interest of the City of.~'igard; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to ORS 222.524, the City must declare the withdrawal of annexed properties from the Dish-ict by
ordmance. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CIT'Y OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECI'ION 1: The properties located in the Tigard Water Dish-ict which have been annexed by the City of Tigard and
Final Order by the Metro Area Boundary commission after the City withdrew from the Tigard Water
District on March 23, 1993, are hereby withdrawn from the Tigard Water District.
SECTION 2: Legal descriptions and maps of the properties to be withdrawn from the Tigard Water District are attached
hereto as Exhibits 1 through 27 and incorporated herein.
SECTION 3: Pursuant to ORS 222.465, the effective date of the withdrawal of these properties from the Tigard Water
District shall be July 1, 1999.
SECTION 4: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its enactment by the Council.
PASSED: By Uf) (t rl't mUUS vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this c2
day of 41999.
- yL,E GU
Catherine Wheatley, City Recor
APPROVED: By Tigard City Council thiday of r~wjxo-~ , 99.
a s Nicoli, Mayor
Approved as to form:
i Attomey
Date
ORDMANCE No. 99-_ Tigard Water District Withdrawls from 3/23/93 to 12/31/98
Page 1 of 1 i:\citywide\ord\wdwithdr.ord.doc Julia H. I I-Feb.-99
-y ~ • CITY OF TIGARD WATER DISTRICT WITHDRAWAL
Boundary Commission
, FinalOrderNo.3s,3o 'I
HIBIT 10 ZCA No. 9s 0003
EX
LEGAL DESCRIPTION Of TNE AREA
. .
A tract of land situated in the Northwest one-quarter of Section 4,
Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washingtori
County, Oregon described as follows:
Beginning at the West one-quarter Corner of Section 4, T 2 S,
•it 1 W of the Willamette Meridian thence N 890 43' 30" E a
distance'of 100.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence N
89° 43130" E a distance of 300.00 feet to the west line of Lot 18 Handy Acres; 'thence N OQ° 42' 55" E a distance of 200 feet;
thence S 890 43' 30" W a distance of 250 feet thence N 000 43'
00" 435.76 feet to the south right-of-way of S.W. Fern Street;
thence S 890 37' 00" W, along said southright-of-way, a distance of 50.00 feet; thence S 000 43' a distance of 635.67 feet to the
true point of beginning.
ViCINITY MAP OF THE AREA
. ~
' TIGARD p
~ 0 5 8
Q 15 R H A N A Y
z I
~ .
a
a °O0 .ao -
I 1 re.c ~
~ = 5 ; _
51-8'~
~ 1!?=-: W = .L J
ao
I21 2
~ 23
20
- ~ -8 g 24
17 , 16
A C ft £ S
I •
W ~
J
<i't2i:{............. i%
W 2'•{ <
o : AREA TO BE
m ANNEXED
i:::::•V. '
i /
'DC ONFIDENTIAIO
City of 7'16AP,D
Address 1~(5'~2D ~f~W ST
HOIISING TYPE TENIIRE
Single Unit Structure (l~ Owner Occupied
Multiple Unit Structure Renter Occupied
Trailer or Mobile Home vacant
RE3IDENTS
Last Name First Name Sex Age
Respondent J EFFp:(zy
2. JFrF~,
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Portland State University School of Urban and Public Affairs I,
Center For Population Research and Census 725-3922 '
. , ; ° • b~ . ~
~J
V\~
Council Agenda Item • ~
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL '
MEETING MIlYiJTES - SEPTEMBER 12, 1995
• Nieeting was called to order at 6:38 p.m. by Mayor Yicoli.
1. ROLL CALL
Council Present: viayor Jim NicoG; Councilors Wendi Conover Hawley, Paul Hunt,
Bob Rohlf, and Ken Scheckla. Staff Present: Bill rlonahan, City Administrator;
Niichael Anderson, Development Review Engineer; Dick Bewersdorff, Senior
Planner; Jim Hendrys, Community Development Director; Liz Yewton, Assistant to
the City Administrator; Jim Coleman, Legal Counsel; Associate Planner Valone;
Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder.
STUDY SESSION
• Ntayor NicoG introduced the following issues:
- Rerional Arterial Road/Street Construction - Three counties, Washington,
i'vIultnomah, and Clackamas, are looking at putting together a proposal for arterial road construction. The counties have approached Metro to
coordinate this effort. There is a proposal for a gas taY of 6 cents per gallon
which will have to be submitted to the voters.
If the voters approve, each county would receive $75 million for road
construction. In addition, a separate fund will be established for bridge
work. W'hile most of the bridges are in iNtultnomah County, there may be
an opportunity for funding of an extension of Hall Blvd. to cross the Tualatin
River.
- Building Code Appeals Board - viayor Nicoli introduced this concept to City
Council. This Board would review appeals relating to building code
requirements. Formation of such a Board has been available in the past for
cities to utilize; however, Tigard has never had such a Board. Niayor NicoG
noted that most of cities of Tigard's size opt to utilize this Board. Further
discussion of this topic has been scheduled for Council review on
September 26. (Recorder Note of schedule chan;e: Council review on
agenda of October 10, 1995.) _
CITY COLNCIL tiIEETING v1N-tTTES - SEPTET-vIBER 12, 1995 - PAGE 1
~
o
- - Urban Grnwth Boundaries (2040 Process) - The majority of Council, after
brief discussion, agreed that the Mayor should send a letter to Metro
supporting Executive Officer Mike Burton's proposal with regard to the
Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). Mr. Burton's proposal is to increase
deasities along major arteriafls and coasider adding 4,000 to 9,000 acres to
the UGB. Councilor ScheckYa advised he did not support this. Councilocs
Hawley, Hunt, and Rolilf advised they had no objection to the Mayor sending
a letter of this type.
Washington Countv Coordinating Committee (WCCC) Update - Mayor Nicoli
noted that at a recent WCCC meeting, there was discussion on the amount
of dollars left from the MSTIP/1 projects ($4 million). The Cominittee would
like to use the funds leftover to apply to cost overruas on a few projects in
MSTIP/2. Project overruns in MSTIP/2 have been contributed to
environmental problems which need to be addressed, or new regulations
which are a contributing factor. It is csrtimated that approldmately $3 million
would be needed to complete these MSTIP/2 projects. All dollar transfers to projects in MSTIP/2 would be referred to the : Washington County
Coordinatimg Committee. _ _ . _ . . . . , -
, : . _ . . . • . . , .
~ Nietro Greenspaces - Tigard will have $750,000 from Metro as their share of .
the voter-approved Greenspaces bond. In Tigard, t6e Citizen Involvement
Teams have been reviewing potential projects which could utilize the Greenspaces money. Coeancil will be reviewing the results of the CIT
information in late October or early November. . .
.
. . , . . , . • . . r • .
- Fanno Creek Watershed - Also related to the Metro Greenspaces bond is
money for 4he Fanno Creek Watershed which is coasidered to be a regional
facility. Niayor Nicoli noted that in discussioas with Mayor Rob Drake, it
was expressed that the cities of Beaverton and Tigard want to be veay
involved in deciding how dollars will be spent in the Watershed since it is
located primarily in these two cities. Part of the Fanno Creek Watershed is
also found in Portland and unincorporated Washington County. During
preliminary discussions, an idea was formulated that a task force could be proposed to review and put together a recommendation for the e.Ypenditure
of the Greenspaces funds. The task force members would consist of
individuals from t6e jurisdictions in wluch the Watershed is located.
- Council Compensation Task Force - George Burgess, Deborah Hinton, and
Craig Dirksen of the Compensation Task Force were present to answer
questioas from City Council. A draft ordinance had been provided to
Council and task force members.
CITY COL1iCII, vIEETI~i 1G vlPi iUTES - SEPTEViBER 12, 1995 - PAGE 2
.
i ~ deposited in this area; this is substandally over the amount granted by a
permit from the A►rmy Corps of Engineers. N1r. Blomgren noted the pians
are for a motel unit with 128 parking spaces to be placed on the site where
currendy there is a designation for a street e.Ytension for 95th street.
City Administrator Monaha0 advised the owners of the property have beem
at City Hall discussing preliminary ideas for a development with Planning
and Engineering staff. An application was recently received.
City Administrator LNionahan advised this project could potentially corrne
before the City Council as a public hearing item. Council should be cautious
about discussing matters regarding the project outside of a hearing process.
Senior Planner Bewersdorff also noted t6at in order to implement the plans
for development, the applicant would have to propose a street vacation which
would be before City Council in a hearing, process.
iNfr. Blomgren referred to the wildlife which lives in the area. He asked that
he be kept informed of the status of any development proposal.
4. CONSEiN'T AGENDA: .
Councilor Hunt requested that Item 4.2(b) be removed for additional discussion.
viotion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Hawley, to approve the
Consent Agenda, less Item 4.2(b).
4.1 Approve City Council viinutes: August 8 and 15, 1995
4.2 Receive and File:
a. Council Calendar
4.3 Approve Library Board and Planning Comm_i_ccion Appointments - Resolution
No. 95-33
4.4 Local Contract Review Board:
a. Award of Contract for Coastruction of the Ash/Scof~ins Street Storm
Drainage CIP
iNtotion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (-NiIayor Nicoli and
Councilors Hawley, Hunt, Rohlf, and Scheckla voted "yes. .
CITY COUNCII. INEEETL1iG vM-U"TES - SEPTEVBER 12, 1995 - PAGE 4
_ • i
Discussion on Item 4.2(b) - Tentative Agendas:
Councilor Hunt asked for status on the following items not listed in the tentataee
agendas:
• Revisions to Development Code
• Summerlake - 130th/Winterlake Connertion
• Water Supply .
• Bikepaths/Greenspaces
City Administrator reported on the above issues as follows:
. • Revisions to Development Code - These revisions include buffering an
residential areas. This project has been placed on the "back burner," as staff
is awaiting results of the 2040 planning process. Staff is also working on
reprioritizing the Triangle issues, as well as transportation issues.
• Summerlake - 130th/Winterlake Connection - Neighborhood meetings aa°e
being scheduled; this item will be assigned an agenda date after these
meetings. -
• Water Supply - This issue will be discussed at the September 26 Council
meeting. .
• Bike aths/Greens aces - Bik
p p ePaths/GreensPaces will be assigned a timelfne
for Council review.
City Administrator Nionahan agreed with Councilor Hunt that the tentative agendas
should show the items listed above; the Tentadve Agendas will be revised and
resubmitted to Council on September 26. He clarified that the Tentative Agendas
are used as a tool to track agenda items and to determine how to schedule future
items by forecasting how full the agendas are becoming.
5. DISCUSS FEE WAIVERS
Community Development Director HendryY reviewed the staff report, noting the
issue before Council was:
• Should Council submit a formal request to Washington County for amending
the Urban Planning Area Agreement?
• Should Council waive the application fees for a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment. CITY COL1i CIL iNIEETDi GMlri 'L"TES - SEPTErIBER 12, 1995 - PAGE 5
. .
~ • .
iNIr. Bledsce initiated discussions with staff earlier this year about changing the
policy in the Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) with Washingdon County
regarding t6e zoning of land upon anncYation to the City. Mr. Bledsce also sent a .
letter to Council dated April 5, 1995. Staff wrote a letter to W. Bledsce on April 6, .
informing hiin that this policy was contained not only in the iJPA►A, but also in the
City's Comprehensive Plan and Community Development Code. Mr. Bledsoe
e.pressed interest in amending the Compreheasive Plan and was advised of the time
period limitatioas for initiating this processs.
Nir. Bledsoe presented his proposal to amend the plan and requested a fee waiver ;
to the West and Central CITs and received their approval on August 1 and August 3 respectively. NIr. Bledsoe then sent a letter to Council reque.sting the fee waiver on ~August 22. Contained in the staff report in the Council packet is a memorandum
to City Council from James HendryY regarding the request or the UPAA amendment
and fee waiver for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. I
iNir. Bledsoe was also present and testified in support of his quest. He submitted to
Council members a memorandum in rebuttal to the memorandum on the matter
from Community Development Director Hendryx.
Council discussed this issue. Assistant to the City Administrator Newton advised -
that the Central and West CTTs agree it was appropriate to proceed to discuss Mr.
Bledsoe's proposal.
After discus,sion with staff inembers, City Council agreed to waive t6e
Comprehensive Plan Amendment processing fee; this amendment wiIl be submitted
during the regular review process cycle ne.Yt Spring. Council also agreed to include
ivlr. Bledsoe's issue on a review of the Urban Planning Area Agreement with he
County, but not to e.Ypedite the timing of the review, given the current workload of
the Planning staff. Staff will analyze the Urban Planning Area Agreement and
determine which issues they would like to reopen with the County, with Mr.
Bledsoe's issues incorporated at the time staff is prepared to request a total review .
with the Countv. iNIotion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to waive the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment fee required to initiate review by the Planning
Commission.
iNIotion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (11-iayor Nicoli, and
Councilors Hawley, Hunt, Rohlf, and Scheckla voted "yes.
CITY COLniCIL INIEETLNG MP1i,TTES - SEPTEVfBER 12, 1995 - PAGE 6
i
6. DISCUSS/REVIEW PROPOSED 2040 COMNEENTS TO FORWA.RD TO NIETRO
In response to a request from Council, the Planning Commission drafted a letter to Nietro regarding the proposed 2040 Plan. Once Council reviewed the letter, several
members, while agreeing with the issues the Commissioa identifed, thought the Caty
should take a more supportive position. Councilor Rohlf redrafted the letter. Thas
redrafted letter is contained in the Council packet.
viotion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to authorize the Mayoir
to sign the letter presented to Metro, commenting on the Region 2040 Plan.
Nlotion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli and
Councilors Hawley, Hunt, Rohlf, and Scheckla voted "yes.
7. UPDATE FROM TASK FORCE ON THE COOS PARK PROPERTY PURCHASE
Councilor Hunt updated t6e Cowncil on a possable purchase of some property
adjacent to Cook Park owned by Mr. Robert Gray. The soccer and little league
organizations are also interested in buying part of this property. Upon request by
Councilor Hunt, Council directed staff to propose an outline of scope of services for
a consultant, including an estimate of the cost for this consultant, to determine how -
much property is needed by the City for proposed uses for parking and recreationafl
areas (i.e., permanent stage, covered picnic area, landscaping).
8. DISCUSS GREENSPACES
vlayor NicoG advised Tigard would be receiving $750,000 for projects within Tigard.
The pubGc review/input is now underway with Citizen Involvement Teams. Mayor
Nicoli also advised that the Fanno Creek Watershed would be receiving dollars as
a regioaal project. The cities of Beaverton and Tigard and the other jurisdictions
affected by the Watershed will be organizing to obtain public input.
, 9. PUBLIC AEARLNG (QUASI-NDICIAL): ZONE CHAIYGE ANNEYr1TION - ZCA
95-0003 - JEFFERY
A request to annex one parcel of 1.88 acres into the City and change the
Comprehensive Plan and Zone from Washington County R-6 to City of Tigard
Medium Density Residential, R-7. LOCATION: The western end of SW Fern
Street adjacent to the Bonneville Power Administration easement. APPLICABLE
REVIEW CRITERIA: The relevant review criteria are Comprehensive Plan Policies
2.1.1, Citizen Involvement; 10.1.1, Service Delivery Capacity; 10.1.2, Boundary
Criteria; and 10.1.3 Zoning Designation. Community Development Code Chapters
13.136, rlnnexation Requirements, and 18.138, Land Classification of Anne.Yed
Territory. ZONE: Presently `Vashington County R-6.
CITY COLTNCIL VEEETNG MINUTES - SEPTEVIBER 12, 1995 - PAGE 7
0 • - .
a. Public Hearing was opened.
b. Declarations and challenges.
Niayor Nicoli read the following:
Do any members of Council wish to report any e.Y parte contact or
information gained outside the hearing, including any site visits? (There were
none.)
Have all members familiarized themselves with the application? (All
members indicated familiarization.)
Are there any challenges from the audience pertaining to the Council's
jurisdiction to hear this matter or is t6ere a challenge on the participation of
any member of the Council? ('P6ere were no challenges.)
Councilor Scheckla received a letter of protest and submitted this letter to
City Administrator iMonahan for review. Upon review, City Administrator
Nionahan advised that the tax lot described in the letter is for property
nearby, but not the subject of this pubGc hearing. The letter was referred -
to Planning staff for follow-up.
c. Staff Report '
Senior Planner Valone reviewed the staff report, which is on file with the
Council packet material. In response to a question from Council, Mr. Yalone
clarified that this annexation would not create an island; Fern Street as a
County street. iNIr. Valone reported that he had visited the site and, in
response to a question from Councilor Scheckla, advised he did not recall
that there were wetlands in the area.
d. Public Testimonv.
iNIayor Nicoli read the following:
For all those wishin; to testify, please be aware that failure to raise an issue
accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to afford the Council and
parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal to the
Land Use Board of Appeals on this issue. Testimony and evidence must be
directed toward the criteria that staff will describe or other criteria in the
plan or land use rewlation which you believe apply to the decision.
CITY COLNCIL vIEETriG MEN-L°TES - SEPTEVIBER 12,4995 - PAGE 8
I
. ~ •
Applicant:
• Gary Jeffrey, 14520 SW Fern Street, Tigard, Oregon, 97223, Qestgfled
in support of the annexatioa.
e. Public Hearing was closed. f. Council Coasideradon.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-39 - A RESOLUTION INTTIATING ANNEXA1'Y°YON
TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE TERRITORY AS DESCRIBEIID N
EXiIBTT "A" A~~iD ILLUSTRATED IN EXiIBTT "A" (ZCA 95-0003)
Niotion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Hawley, to adopt
Resolution No. 95-39.
iNiotion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council gresent. (Niayor Nicou
and Councilors Hawley, Hunt, Rohif, aad Scheckla voted "yes.")
ORDINA,~TCE NO. 95-18 - AN ORDINANCE ADOP'TING FINDIN~S AND
CONCLUSIONS TO t1PPROYE A ZONE CHANGE AND DECLARIlVG AN EFFECTNE DATE (ZCA 95-0003)
iNtotion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to adopt Ord►nance
No. 95-18
~ Motion was approved by a unanimous vote of Council present. (Niayor Nicou
and Councilors Hawley, Hunt, Rohlf, and Scheckla voted "yes.
10. PUBLIC HEaRING (QUASI-JUDICIAL): APPEAL OF A REQUEST FOR A
SUBDIVISION (SUB) 95-0002/LOT LTVi E ADNS1'v1EiN'I' (INIIS) 95-0012 Al
SENSITIVE LAiNDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0006 a.PPROVAL - FOItAaN
PLACE/PICULELL GROUP
A request for approval of the following development applications:
' l. Subdivision preliminary plat approval to divide an approrimately 3.9 acre ,
parcel iato 12 lots ran;ing between 6,091 square feet to 8,737 square feet.
2. Lot Line adjustment request to adjust two parcels of approJrimately 4.53 and
2.26 acres into two parceLs of approAmately 3.9 and 2.89 acres.
3. Sensitive Lands Review approval of preliminary plans for grading, road
_ construction and development of portions of the subject propeaty that exceed
25 percent grade.
CITY COLiNCIL iNEEETLNG iNMNL''I'ES - SEPTEVIBER 12, 1995 - PAGE 9
.
• • . ,
1LOCATION: West of Woodford Estates, and approximately 650 feet north of S. W.
Bull Ntountain Road. (WC'TiNi 2S1, 9AB, Tar Lots 1200 and 5700). APPLICABLE
. REVIEW CRdTERIA: Commuaity Development Code Section 18.52, 18.84, 18.88,
18.92, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, 18.160 and 18.164.
Comprehensive Plan PoGcies: 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 7.6.11
8.1.1 and 3.1.3. ZONE: R-7 (Residential, 7 units per acre). The R-7 zone allow►s
single family residential units, duple.Y residential units, public support facilities,
residential treatment home, farming, manufactured home, family day care, home
occupation, temporary use, and accessory structures.
a. PubGc Hearing was opened.
b. Declaradons or Challenges.
Niayor NicoG read the following:
Do any members of Council wish to report any eY parte contact oe
informadon gained outside the hearing, including any site visits? (lYoane
reported.)
Have all members famiGarized themselves with tbe appGcadoa? (AIlfl -
members indicated familiarizataon.)
Are there any challenges from the audience pertaining to the Council's
jurisdiction to hear this matter or is there a challenge on the participation of
any member of the Council? (There were no challenges.) '
c. Staff Report
Senior Planner Bewersdorff reviewed the staff report, which is on file with
the Council packet material. An appeal was filed with regard to the Hearings
Officer's decision as contained in the Final Order on file with the Council
packet material. Staff recommended that Council support the applicant's
request, which would accommodate the westerly and southerly street
connection. Staff recommended that City Council adopt the findings as
contained in the staff report submitted to the Hearings Officer. Condition
9 of the Hearin;s Officer's Final Order should also be deleted as it relates to
the redesign of the proposed Foran Street. It is recommended that City
Council approve amended conditions by adopting the resolution contained in
the Council packet material.
CITY COUYCII. MEETING MI]Nti"TES - SEPTEViBER 12, 1995 - PAGE 10
. • . •
d. Public Testimony
Mayor Nicoli read the following: For all those wishing to testify, please be aware that failure to raise an issue
accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to afford the Council and
parties an opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude an appeal to the
Land Use Board of Appeals on this issue. Testimony and evidence must be
directed toward the criteria that staff will describe or other criteria in ttne
_ plan or land use regulation which you believe apply to the decision. Applicant:
0 Art Piculell, 3236 SW Kelly, Portland, Oregon, testified on behalf of
the appGcant. Mr. Piculell submitted a list of cYhibits w6ich are
contained in the Council packet materia! (he reviewed them wittn
Council, noting areas of disagreement with t6e staff proposal as i4
related to the Comprehensive Plan). Mr. Piculell also reviewed areas
of the Hearings Officer decision where he believed t6ere were
problems. He advised that letters had been submitted from Elizabet➢n .
Price, 13125 SW Bull Mountain Road, and Mark & Linda Cooley9
13135 SW Bull Mountain Road, with regard to loss of privacy relating
to a proposed bikepath in the area.
Nir. Piculell noted the Hearings Officer's decision, Page 9, listed a
, series of exceptions to Section 18.164.040 (B) (1), noting there are
e.risting homes in the area so the exception is met with regard to
earlier streets not e.YCeeding 1,800 feet.
ir. Piculell advised the City's bike system plan (1988) does not
indicate any bikepath in the area. He also noted the location of the
bikepath leading to a collector and to. an arterial. He reiterated that
they were within the esception rulings for pedestrian paths.
• Frank Foran, 13145 SW Bull viountain Road, Tigard, Oregon, 97224,
' testified, noting he was the owner of the property. iNIr. Foran testified
with re;ard to concerns for privacy if the development is conditionecl
as requested by the bikepath. He also noted concerns for the Price
and Cooley property.
• Charles Chimento and William Horning were also signed up to speak
on this matter; 6owever, they declined to make comments.
CITY COL,iCIL viEETI~i iG v1"L"TES - SEPTEVIBER 12, 1995 - PAGE 11
• • ,
Opponents:
0 Ed Me#zler, 13267 SW Bull Mountain Road, Tigard, Oregon, 97224,
testified and submitted a letter to City Council dated September 12,
1995, w6ich is contained in the Council packet material. Mr. Metzler
advised he was not in support of the agreement on the western road
extension. He questioned that the curve should be more gradual and
moved to the east to provide a safer street and to preserve the large
trees that may be destroyed if the road is placed farther north.
• Niilce Done, 14401 SW 130th Street, Tigard, Ore;on, 97224, testified
with regard to safety issues concerning traffic. He noted he would be
in support of bike paths and e.Ypressed concern over e.YCessive length
of blocks. He noted it would fit the city's needs, in the long run, to
have these bikepaths.
• Ken Steele, 8035 SW Churchill, Tigard, Oregon, 97224, testified in
support of a bikepath that would make it possible to travel out of the
area without having to backtrack. He advised he would like to see
more connectivity in the community with bikepattps.
• William F. Horning, 2436 SW Kelly, Portland, Oregon, 97201, noted
Conditions 2 and 3 of the plan, advising that access to the area had
been planned by using 132nd Avenue. He said that pedestrian access
at arterials represents a safety hazard. He advised he shares a
concern for a continuous bike system, but feels it cannot be achieved
in an economical format as proposed. He advised that safety issues
had been addressed in the Hearings Officer's decision. With regard to Mr. ~ietzler's concerns, he noted the applicant had
tried to pull the road up as far as they could. He referred to the
extension which would also meet the transportation plan.
• Sandy Metzler, 13267 SW Bull Mountain Road, Tigard, Oregon,
97224, •testified with regard to history in the area and the location of
some fill. `Vith re;ard to the statement that 132nd Street was to be
utilized to address the connectivity concerns, she advised that 132nd
Street was not yet a road and would not become a road in the
foreseeable future. She proposed that the development should be
smaller to mitigate some of the traffic issues, and advocated a
different layout to accomplish some of the. connectivity issues.
CI'TY COL,iCII, vEET]ING INILNiJ'TES - SEPTEViBER 12, 1995 - PaGE 12
. • •
Rebuttal
• iMr. Foran testified during the rebuttal phase, referrnng to the Mr.
Metzler's concerns with trees. He advised that some trees would be
eliminated. He noted he aLso has a tree farm on his property and that
Mr. Art Piculell has prnmised Mr. Foran that he wmuld retain as
many trees as possible.
• Nir. Piculell noted that witti the requested width of the right-of-way,
three of the four trees would aeed to be removed with the Heariags
Officer design. He acknowledged that some of the tsees would have
to come out.
e. Staff Recommendation. .
i Staff recommendation was to approve the proposed resolutmmn as writteaao
Staff noted that some of t6e large trees will be affected.
Council discussion followed. There was concern e.icpressed vvnth regard to the
agenda item scheduled far later in the meeting to consider a proposed tree
ordinance. Legal Counsel Coleman advised the ordinance would not affect .
this application before City Council. The application wouald follow the
ordinance in effect at the time the appGcation was submitted. He noted that
the actual building of the homes could be affected by the tree ordinance, if .
certain conditions were imposed by the ordinance at t6e time of building of
the development.
There were Council questions with regard to the drawings. It was offered by
staff that if the half-street improvements were made, then the turn-arounsfl
area. as shown on one of the maps would not be needed. Council was advised
by vlichael Anderson of the Engineering Department that the Fire Marshall
has not reviewed the plans without the turn-around. There were questions
on the number of trees which would be taken out (siY inches in diameter and
greater) should the Planning staff's recommendation be put into place. The record is to remain open on two issues:
1. Staff is to obtain input from the Fire Marshal on the turnaround; that
is, is it needed if the staff s proposal is implemented?
2. The applicant is to determine the number of trees (6-inches in
diameter and greater) which would be affected if the Planning Staff's
proposal is implemented.
CITY COL:NCII. NEEETING MENZJTES.- SEPTEVIBER 12, 1995 - PAGE 13
• . . .
f. Niotion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Rohif, to continue the
tiearing to September 26, 1995.
Niayor Nicoli advised that on September 26 testimony would be limited to t6e
two issues identified. (as stated above.)
Council meeting recessed at 10:02 p.m. 'I
Council meedng reconvened at 10:16 p.m.
11. PUBLIC EWARING (LEGISIA1'IVE): ZONE ORDiNANCE AMENDMENI' (ZOA)
92-0004 TREE REMOVAI,
LOCATION: Citywide. A request by the City of Tigard to replace Chapter 18.150
of the City of Tigard Community Development Code wit6 new code provisions
pertaining to tree removal and to provide amended provisions for a stop work order
hearing in Section 18.24.070. The proposed amendments to section 18.150 call for
the following: ~
1. Tree remoeal pe.smits only on sensitive lands as defined by Chapter 18.84;
2. A tree plan prepared by a certified arborist to be provided with any
development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development
review, planned development or conditional use;
3. iNlitigation requirements for tree removal in developments; .
4, The prohibition of commercial forestiy (reffioval of ten (10) trees or more,
per acre, per calendar year for sale);
5. Permit cYemption for land used for Christmas tree production or if registered
as property ta.Y deferred tree farms or small woodlands;
6. Permit criteria including erosion control standards and seventy-five (75) I
percent canopy cover within fifty (50) feet of stream or wetland; I,
7. Provisioas for incentives and setback adjustments to allow for tree retention;
8. Penalties for the illegal removal of trees;
9. Replacement tree provisions.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITEYtIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, and 5;
Comprehensive Plan PoGcies 1(General Policies), 2(Citizen Involvement), 3.4.b
(Natural Areas), and Implementation StrateU of Policy 3.4; and Community
Development Code Chapter 18.30.120.
a. Public Hearing opened.
b. Staff Report. '
Senior Planner Bewersdorff reviewed the staff report which was contained in the ,
Council packet material. Staff recommended approval of the proposed Tree
Ordinance as submitted in the Council packet. ~
I
I
CTTY COUiNCIL iNfEETNG v1LXtTTES - SEPTEVIBER 12, 1995 - PAGE 14
~ •
c. Public Testimony.
Proponents: .
• Ken Steele, 8035 SW Churchill, Oregon, 97225 commended the Catrq
Council for the proposal which was before them. Mr. Steele spoke oT
his concerns with the commercial forestry section, noting that t6e
intent of the ordinance was to prevent people from clearing land. He
said he believes the commercial forestry portion, allowing cutting of
ten trees per acre, presented a loophole to the ordinance's intent. He
recommended this language be tighteried to allow the reffioval of five
trees per acre per year.
• Christie Herr, 11386 SW Ironwood Loop, Tigard, Oregon, 97223,
advised she was a member of the Task Force and supported the
ordinance. However, Ms. Herr advised she had some issenes with t1ae
commercial fore.stry portion of the ordinance. She stated the Task
Force had decided not to present a minority report; therefore, iNs.
I Herr advised her testimony was being presented as an individual.
Ms. Herr noted that ten trees per acre per year s6ould be
reconsidered as proposed in the commercial forestry section of the tree .
ordinance. She recommended a reduction to five trees.
• Malcolm F. Kirsop, 11323 SW Basswood Court, Tigard, Oregon,
97223, advised the ordinance represented a good plan and said it was
an eYCellent concept. He did share the concern that ten trees per acre
(commercial forestry) was not definitive enough.
• Doug Smithey, 11396 SW Ironwood Loop, Tigard, Oregon, 97223,
advised he served on the Task Force and supported the ordinance. He
advised he felt that concerns e.Ypressed by individuals with regard Yo
the commercial forestry were legitimate, noting that the Task Force
did not talk about an average number of trees removed on acreage
owned by individuaLs. He advised this deserved additional reviewe
Opponents:
• Joseph Schweitz, 12505 S`V North Dakota, No. 1604, Tigard, Oregon,
97223, testified with regard to concerns of cost which would be passed
on to private property owners. He referred to restrictions placed on
developers building houses. However, once a private property owner
purchases one of these homes, the property ovmer would have to
remove or care for the trees; this would represent additional costs.
CITY COL,iCIL iNEEETP iG v1LN-UTES - SEPTEMBER 12, 1995 - PAGE 15 -
• ,
i
• Bob Bledsoe, 11300 SW Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, 97223,
testified with regard to wording on two different sections of the
ordinance. He referred to Page 2, 18.150.025(a), noting an e.YCeption
when no trees would be affected. He also requested that t6e words
"when such a permit is required," be added to a paragraph on Page
7. ~vYr. Bledsoe advised that the law appeared to be appGed more
broadly than was needed.
• vlr. Bob O'Dell, member of t6e Task Force, responded to an inquiry
from Councilor Hawley: Tree removal had been discussed for ~
sensitive lands only.
Doug Scnithey also referred to the regulations that were for
commercial forestry only. People cutting down trees foc landscaping
were not affected by the tree ordinance.
There was reference to a letter submitted by the Fans of Fanno Creek
with re;ard to protection of the tree canopy. Upon request of
Council, NIr. Smithey reviewed the importance of tree canopies to the
eco-system.
d. Staff Recommendation. ~
Staff recommended approval of the tree ordiaance as written.
e. Council Discussion ,
In response to a question from Councilor Hawley, Senior Planner
Bewersdorff responded that the "ten trees," as cited in the commercial
forestry section of the ordinance, was selected by the Task Force through a
coasensus process. The Task Force did not want to be overly restrictive on
private property rights.
There was brief discussion on vlr. Bledsoe's suggestions for wording changes.
Mr. Bewersdorff advised he believed some of the wording was impGed, but
said he did not object to the additional words suggested by Mr. Bledsoe.
f. Public Hearin; was closed.
a. Council Consideration.
CITY COL,iCIL vIEETrqG iNILr`UTES - SEPTEVIBER' 12, 1995 - PAGE 16
, . ' , - • ~ II
' -
h. Motion by Councilor Hawley, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to change the
number of. trees from ten to five as the number of trees per acre in the
. definition of commerciafl forestry; to add the words "when such permit is
required" as suggested by Mr. Bledsce, and to incorporate the Fans of Fanno
- Creek verbiage on tree canopy as submitted in their letter, which is coantained
in the Council packet material.
Discussion on the motion followed. Councilor Rolilf was reluctant to change
any of the wording of the ordinance drafted by the Tree Task Force. He
. referred to a letter from Sally Christensen, member of the Tree Task Force,
. which stated she would object to any amendment to the tree ordinance which
- the Task Force had put together. Councilor Hunt noted his agreement with
. Councilor Rohlf, and advnsed he would withdraw his. second to tpae motion on
the floor.
Councilor Scheckla suggested the ordinance be adopted as presented by the
Task Force. Then, if problems occur, amendments could be proposed at a
.later date.
Councilor Scheckla commended the Task Force for a fine jobe .
Coeincilor Hawley made a motion to approve Ordinance No: 95-19, with one
amendment to Section 18.150.020, changing the commercial forestry trees
from ten to five. There was no second to the motion.
i. ORDOiANCE NO. 95-19 - AN ORDINAiCE TO ArvIEND PItOVISIONS OF
THE CONIlNIIJNITY DEVELOPNIENT CODE BY ADOPTING A REVLSED
CODE CHAPTER 18.150 REGARDING TREE REMOVAL (ZOA 92-0004)
AiND NEW SECTIONS 18.24.070.
Motion by Councilor Iiawley, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt
Ordinance No. 95-19 as submitted.
Motion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (vtayor Yicoli
and Councilors Hawley, Hunt, Rohlf, and Scheckla voted "yes.
j. RESOLU"TION NO. 95-40 - A RESOLUTION TO A,-VEEND RESOLUTION
NO. 91-01 TO EST.4BLISH A FEE FOR A TREE RENIOVAL PERMIT
AND SETTI~i 1G AN EFFECTIVE DATE. .
iNtotion by Councilor Hawley, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to adopt
Resolution No. 95-40.
CITY COL1iCII, vEEETPi iG INIPi 1U'I'ES - SEPTEMBER 12, 1995 - PAGE 17
~
~ ~ .
iNtotion was approved by unanimous vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli and Councilors Hawley, Hunt, Rohlf, and Scheckla voted "yes.
After brief Council discussion, it was decided that the Task Force woiald be asked
to meet again to determine whether amendments should be coasidered to the
ordinance with regard to the number of tree per acre,. allowing for commercial
forestry (reduce from ten to f ve), and to review the tree canopy recommendation
= offered by the Fans of Fanno Creek.
Items 12, 13 and 14 were set over to October 10, 1995.
12. REVIEW DEPARTI~IEN'TAL SERVICE STAiNDARDS
13. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: PROPOSED AMENDNIENT TO COUNCYL
CONIPENSATION
14. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION: COUNCIL GROUNDRULES
15. NON-AGEYDA TTENIS
o Award a Water Rate Study Contract Council reviewed an issue presented by City Administrator Monahan wi4h
regard to CH_tiI Fiill and the Water Rate Study. The principals who made
the presentation to the Intergovernmental Water Board were awarded the
contract and but are no longer with the CH_M Hill. ivlinunal progress has
been made on the rate study. After discussion, Council decided that CHZM
Hill and EES will be asked to make another presentation to the
Intergovernmental Water Board. CH:M Hill will be asked to agree to
terminate their contract if Council decides to go with another consultant.
16. Esecutive Session - Canceled.
17. Adjournment - 11:26 p.m.
Attest: Catherine W'heatley, City Recorder
Ni y, City of Tigard ate: f
cano9i2.9s
CITY COLiYCIL iNIEETL1iG MINL"TES - SEPTEVIBER 12, 1995 - PAGE 18
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION A4~
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
F I LE N O: ZCA 95-0003
FILE TITLE: Jeffery
APPLICANT: Harry & Judith Jeffery OWNER: Same
14520 SW Fern Street
Tigard, OR 97223
REQUEST: Annex one parcel of 1.88 acres into the city and change the comprehensive plan and zone
from Washington County R-6 to City of Tigard Medium Density Residential, R-7.
LOCATION: The western end of SW Fern Street adjacent to the Bonneville Power Administration
easement.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW CRITERIA: The relevant review criteria are Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, citizen
involvement; 10.1.1, service delivery capacity; 10.1.2, boundary criteria; and 10.1.3,
zoning designation. Community Development Code chaPters 18.136, annexation
requirements; and 18.138, land classification of annexed territory.
ZONE: Presently Washington County R-6.
CIT: West CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request
PHONE NUMBER: (503)
DECISION MAKING BODY
STAFF DECISION
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30
HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00
X CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: 9/12/95 TIME: 7:30
RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
VICINITY MAP X LANDSCAPING PLAN NARRATIVE
ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN OTHER
STAFF CONTACT: Ray Valone (503) 639-4171 x336
J ~ .
♦
Na e Final Order Number
,
ANNEXATION FOLLOW-UP PROCEDURE
1. Receive Final Order from Boundary Commission. Date
2. Request census.
If less than 200 homes City Recorder must perform.
(Put in work order for Office Aide assistance) e/
If more than 200 homes, Portland State performs: Date
PSU Center For Population Research 464-3947
. Individual census form to be filled out for each address
when interviewing residents at their homes.
. If annexation area comes in close to end of the quarter
(March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31) get census
certified to Portland State approximately one week prior
to these dates to allow state-shared revenue to be received
for the next full quarter.
• If census to be done through PSU, call and schedule census
to be completed as soon as possible. Negotiate contract and
get necessary signatures. Check with Recorder for any Local
Contract Review Board involvement requirements.
3. Make 25 copies of Final Order.
4. Prepare department distribution o'I Finsl-Afder w/map.
Chief of Police - Ron Goodpaster
Engineering -
Planning - Ray Valone
Accounting - Amanda Bewersdorff
Building Official - David Scott
Librarian - Kathy Davis
Community Development - Nels Mickaelson
City Recorder - Cathy Wheatley
Water - Randy Volk
Send memorandum to department distribution, listing names
and addresses of all citizens in the newly annexed area.
Effective date from Boundary Commission should be included
in memo. Date
5. Notify agencies of annexation (see list attached). Letters must
be sent by certitied mail to:
General Telephone Co.; Paciflc NW Bell Telephone; NW Natural Gas;
Unitied Sewerage Agency; MACC; Portland General Electric;
Tualatin Valley Water District; Pride Disposal; Miller's Sanitary
Service, Inc.; Schmidt's Sanitary Service.
Only send letter to OLCC if a liquor license outlet is involved. Date I/-~~/•-~
6. Send Mayor's welcome letter to newly annexed citizens at each
address (include New Citizen Packet with letter).
(Also check with City Recorder if annexation 90 days before primary
or general election on even years or 34 days prior to any special ~
election date.) Date
7. If the area being annexed has a hotel or motel, notify Washington
County for receipt of Transit Room Tax. Date
8. If there are businesses in the newly annexed area notify Business
Tax Coordinator for the City. Date
9. City Recorder has a file folder titled "TRUE CASH VALUE." This ~
file is to be kept up-to-date with annexation statistics at all times! Date
10. Complete and mail Portland State Questionnaire, when received.
Include cover letter, completed questionnaire and individual
census forms to: (Retain copy for our files)
Annexations Center for Population Research & Census
Portland State University
P.O. Box 751
Portland, OR 97207 Date
11. Place annexation file folder in Central Files. Place all material
in date order. Type label to reflect annexation name, Boundary
I Commission Order number along with location description. Date
h:\loginVo\annexpro.l
Revised 03/95
NOTICE TO TAXING DISTRICTS
ORS 308.225
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE This is to not'rfy you that your boundary
Cartogranhic Unit change in Uashington County, for
955 Center Street NE AtJid[X TO TEIE CITY OF
5alemr Ok 97310 TIGARD. WITHDRAW FR0M
(503) 945••8297 LlASli. G0. SERV. DIST.
. FAX (503) 945-8737 iVO. 1
TDD t503> 945-•8517 FINAL ORDER. 3530
has been:
CITY OF T%GARD ~ Received 10-30-95
FINANCE AIRECTOR 13125 SW F9ALL BLVD
TIGARD OR 97223 X~ Approved 11-13-95
Notes: ❑ Disapproved (see notes) ~
FOR MAPPING UNIT AND ASSESSOR USE ONLY Department of Revenue file number: DOR 34-•-1495-••95 19ike liughes
oundary: (3 Change ❑ Proposed change ❑ Planned change
The change is for:
❑ Formation of a new district ~ Description
~ Annexation of a territory to a district . Ll Map ~ PESGR IPT ION AidD MAP ARPROVCD ~
~ Withdrawal of a territory from a district ~ 11-13-95 ~K
❑ Dissolution of a district ~c AS ER ORS 308.225
I ❑ Transfer ~~K*~K#******~~~K~R**~K~K~~K~~K*********
❑ Merge Received from: P. hf o R. C.
150-303-039 (Rev. 12-93)
Dlatributlon: WhAe - taxing dlst. Canary - county asaessor Plnk- Dept. ol Revenue Goldenrod - county commisslonera or County Court/Boundary Commleabn (It epproprlate)
Z 045 322 407 Z 045 322 404 Z 045 322 405
~ C~ tif ed 6VIai9 Receipt for ' Receipt for - '
~ Certified Mail ~ Certified Mail I
~ No Insurance Coverage Provided No Insurance Covera e Provided
~ 9 No Insurance Coverage Provided
UMTFDSTATES Do not use for International Mail ~
VOST4l5E1NICE Do not use for International Mail
(See Reversel, ~;,o~*. Do not use for International Mail
_(See_ Rev_erse.)---- I : Sem (See Reversel
i Sent to
to • ~
;Sireel and;IQ"o: 1 i - - - - - - - - a - -
S~ tre t and Stree NJFO. < .
P. , State and ZI Code P.0`S.,_ State and Z C^dey p,0 tate and ZIP Cod
o ,
tage e s I Postage
. , V $ . ~ ~ Postage 1 . ~ cti I
/
' Certified Fee Certified Fee ~ $ d'+
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee Special Delivery Fee Special Delivery Fee I
Restricied Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee i
Restricted Delivery Fee ,
' (4)
Return Receipt Showing ~ M Return Receipt Showing C.) II~
~ to Whom & Date Delivered ~
~ to Return Whom Receipt Oate Showing Delivered W to Whom & Date Delivered A
L Return Receipt Showing to Whom, ~ <,J
t Return Receipt Sho ' o m`
~ Da~e, and Addresse ' t Return Receipi Show hom,
~ ~ Date, and Addres eV L Date, and Addr~fAdUies~
~ TOTAL Postage TOTAL Postag ~ .
O & Fees & Fees 2 TOTAL Posta`e\i. $ 0 Postmark o~ °v O Postmark or t ~ & Fees
~ CD yrl 1 0 Postmark ~ te
Y ~ ~ b~
M 1~ M
~~y~, ~
€ l!
` ~ ~ + 1
Z 045 322 406 Z 045 322 408 Z 045 322 409 Receipt for Rece9pt for Receipt for
~ Certified Mail ~ Certifieo3 NIaiB ~ Certified Mail I
No Insurance Coverage Provided ~ No Insurance Coverage Provided No Insurance Coverage Provided
Do not use for International Mail Do not use for International Mail Do not use for International Mail
POSruSEWACE (See Reverse) (See Reverse). _LSee_ Reversel_
- -1 eq{:tq, 40 - - i I~
M-S(reef and No. tt- ea, W Stre d'No- j I
wP.0 tate and ZIP ode P.O., State and ZIP C de ^ ( p,p„ tete a ZIP Code
7l~Q e ~t ~ Z ~
oi os age y,~ Postage $ ~J Postage s
i Certified Fee $ Certified Fee 0 ~ Certified Fee `
~J
Special Delivery Fee ~ Special Delivery Fee ~ Special Delivery Fee
I~ Restricted Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee
~ Return Receipt Showing 03 Return Rece;pt Showing ~ Return Receipt Showing 01 to Whom & Oate Delivered to Whom & Date Deliveed IM to Whom & Date Deliveretl r• ! O ~I
L Return Receipt Showing to Whom, t Return Receipt Showing to Whom, t Return Receipt Showing,rof'Whortj;.
~ Date, and Addressee ' ti+ess ~ Date, and Addressee's L Date, and Addre e~',sl4adjQSs
~ TOTAL Post e TOTAL Postage 0 TOTAL Postag
& Fees N/. $ ~ & Fees & Fees , ;IIi-
p "vt/ r- O Postmark or Date
~ Postmar pfi ate ~ ~ ~Postmark or ~[~a1~e;
E ~ E
o . ,
~s. o
~
6~I ~'j q1.
~ ~ sT a-~ --y4--•-%• , I
I
il
. . : . . . •
~
.o SENDER:
~•y • Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the SENDER: I also wish to receive the
I m• Complete items 3, and 4a & b. fOllOWing SBfVIC6S (}Or an extra m • Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
UE• Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can V • Complete items 3, and 4a & b. fOllOwlng SBfViC@S (for an extra
I4) retum this card to you. fee)' ` • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can fee1:
I m• Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address m retum this card to you.
I does not permit. N • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address
m •
t Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number. d
• The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date 2• ❑ Restricted Delivery does not permit.
•m i . Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number. 2, ❑ Restricted Delivery
o deiivered. Consult postmaster for fee. m' • The Return Receipt Fee will provide you the signature of the person delivere i
"0 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number ¢ i to and the date of delivery. COnSUIt ostmaster for fee.
m
c ~ 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number
a(j~~.~~'I~t.v, Z(~ ~ 5 3 2- Z- Z O4l Z5- 3~Z[~
-y-- [G 5
~ ^ 4b. Service Type ~ 4b. Service Type
o f~, „ ❑ Re i s t e r e d ❑ I n s u r e d
9 ~ i ❑ Re9istere d ❑ Insure d
Certified ❑ COD
ffl J r p( SVr~-
y 7`~ • ~£ertified ❑ COD
~ ~ ~1 y w ❑ Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt for n ~
Merchandise Z Li S-- ❑ Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt for
7• Date o Deli ery w Merchandise
17. Date of Deliv ey ~
Q I ~ I/~7'~
~ 5. Signatur Addressee) 8. Add sse s Address (Only if requested c 5. Si nature (Addressee) 8. Addresse ' Address (Only if requested /0 and fee is paid) 9 and fee is paid)
~ . S'gnat e gentl H '
6. Signature (
y PS Form 3811, December 1991 itU.S.CaP0:1983-352-714 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
PS Form , ovember 1990 *u.s. oao: 1991-287-066 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
~ -
i
dSENDER: m SENDER:
'o ■Complete items 1 and/or 2 for addilional services. I 31S0 wlSh t0 fBCelVe th2 Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I eISO wish t0 receive the
y
cO ■Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b.
following senrices (for an ~ m• Complete items 3, and 4a & b. following serviCes (for an extra m • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can
m■ Prirrt your name and address on the reverse oi this fortn so that we can retum this fee): '2
>
~ card co you. extra fee): m ro return this card to you. -
Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address ~
~ permit. P p 1. ❑ Addressee's Address does not permit. m
d L' Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number.
m ■ Write'Retum Receipt Requested'on the maitpiece below the aAiGe number. 2. ❑ RBStfiCted DeliVery
2 ❑ Restricted Delivery
~ ■The Retum Receipt will show to whom the artide was delivered and the date • The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date m
delivered
. a~ delivered. COnSUIt ostmaster for fee. ~
o Consult posbnaster for fee. ~ I o .
~
-a 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number a4-o 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number ~
m ~/f Z vy 5 3 a~ 4-1v y c t m Z D~r~ 3z z ~
E F 4b. Senrice Type B i~ 4b. Service Type cc
o m o ~ ❑ Regis tere d ❑ Insure d
~ ! b v ~ _ ❑ Registered ~ Certified 0
01 o~ `~Certified ❑ COD ~
`~~/L j~~~ O Express Mail ❑ Insured W ❑ Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt for
❑ R e t u m R e cei p t f o r M e r c h a ncfls e ❑ C O D M e r c h a n d i s e .
4~711,3 o ~ 7. Dat 7. D a t e o f D e liv ery 7
eof ~ Q
/-:elive ~
5. Received By: (Print Name) 8: Addressee's Address (Only if requested Y~ 5. Signature (Addressee) 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested ,Y
cM and fee is paid) ~
ead fee is paid) r
~ 6. ~gna 4ur ( yentl^
' ~
0 6. Signature: ( dre ~e¢-o~ent)
~ X o
> PS F9Cm 3811, December 1991 ,ws.Gao:1eea-as~au DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
Ps Form 3811, December 1994 Domestic Return Receipt -
,
SENDER:
• Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I eISO WiSh t0 fBCBIVB th8 i
• Complete items 3, and aa & b. following services (for an extra
• Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can f@el:
return this card to you.
• Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address
does not permit.
• Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece 6elow the articla number. Z. ❑ R@StflCted DBIIVBry
• The Return Receipt Fee will provide yau the signature of the person delivere
to and cne date of deiiverY. Consuit postmaster for fee.
3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number
~ ~GG 4b. Service Type
❑ Registered ❑ Insured
(,j A-Certified ❑ COD '
❑ Express Mail ❑ Retum Receipt for
Merc dise
7. Date of Delivery
~ t-\
5. Signature (Addressee) 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested
and fee is paid)
6. S' atyre IAgen~
~ L..'~.'~tSt ~
PS Form 391 Novemb 99 *u.s. GPO: 1991-2e7-0ss DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
h
m SENDER:
~ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I 81S0 WiSh t0 receive th8
N
m• Complete items 3, and 4a & b. fOllOwing services (for an extra 4;
y• Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can fee):
~ return this card to you.
• Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or an the back if space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address y
m
, does not permit.
t• Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the maitpiece below the article number. 2, ❑ Restricted Delivery •a
• The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date ~
~ delivered. Consult ostmaster for fee. ~
~ 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number ~
a ~tlG, G~ ~e c~~ Z 0 4.5- m
4b. Service Type oC
❑ Registered ❑ Insured
c
° Certified ❑ COD ~
y ❑ Ex ress Mail ❑ Return Receipt for .3
~ c! P Merchandise o
7. Date of Delivery
w
Q i~✓ - f{_ ' ~ ~ l ~ o
.
z 5. Signature (Addressee) 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested Y
~ and fee is paid) ~
r
LU
6. Sign re-4Ageni)
Form 3811, Decemtier 1991 ,*us. GPO: 1eM-a52a114 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
°
2
• MEMORANDUM •
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON I
T0: Ron Goodpaster, Amanda Bewersdorff, Nels Mickaelson, Cathy Wheatley,
Randy Wooley, Randy Volk, David Scott, Kathy Davis
FROM: Ray Valone
DATE: November 14, 1995
SUBJECT: Final Order on Annexation 3530 (Jeffery)/ZCA 95-0003
We have received the final order on Annexation 3530 (Jeffery), effective October 19,
1995. Census information is as follows:
Final Order 3530:
owner:
Harry & Judith Jeffery 2S1 04BC-01 100
14520 SW Fern Street Est. population: 2
Tigard, OR 97223 Single family dwetling
/
TIGARD ro ~ Y I
O ~ 8 i• y 9 ~ 8 'r I
~ ~I ~
~ 13 13 , H A N D y ~
~
2_ I
O
Q
I
~ IlR I ' ~ I
. ~ sW ~ ~ .
51'8~
21 "°22
b?.
20 23
~ _o
' p 19 ~ 24
17 ie A IC R E J I
J V`'
a~o::; ii`i ti.;.::: ~::.yti::.; :ti; > .a.:\1.L:~:~:w:v;:.t\)• Z
Z'~~ AREA TO BE I
••My:; I
h:\IoginUerree\annexmem
November 14, 1995
FINAL ORDER ON ANNEXATION 3530 (JEFFERY)
We have received the final order on Annexation 3530 (Jeffery), effective
October 19, 1995. Census information is as follows:
Final Order 3530:
owner:
Harry & Judith Jeffery 2S1046C-01100
14520 SW Fern Street Est. population: 2
Tigard, OR 97223 Single family dwetling
E• ~ r~~ rr • r' rr~ u•
A1 ~
TIGARD b =
\
9
~ 0 5 8 .
~ '2 T
o H A N D Y
, N
+ I
ti
E Q
-
~ _ = e~ ~r ro . Srq
.
sut
51-81 1
` I a az - -
t 20 u I
' II
~ z4
; r 1 n s
: :a-: = A IC R _ S I
i
J (
~ ~ 4~J':L}{;::•_T~[~;
W WWJI.\
W \
♦ ~ I
~ $ ` AREA TO 8E
ANNQCED I
~ ~ : 4.\\•wiY.!t ~ 4 •vn~~','' '
Please call if you have any questions.
Ray Valone
Community Development Department
~
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
November 21, 1995
Mayor
Jim Nicoii
City Council
Harry and Judith Jeffery Wendi Conover Hawley
14520 SW Fem Street Paul HuM
Tigard, OR 97223 Bob Rohlf
Ken Scheckla
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Jeffery:
We received official notification that the annexation proposal you requested became final. The effective
date of the annexation was October 19, 1995.
On behalf of the City Council, I welcome you to the City of Tigard. The Counry Elections Department has
been notified; they will update your voter registration so you can vote on Tigard issues and candidates.
Emergency public safety services can be reached by dialing 9-1-1. The Fire District continues to serve
you as before. The Tigard Police Department will now respond instead of the Sheriff's Department.
Please call the Police Department for any public safety concems you may have.
Tigard is proud of its well-run facilities. Street maintenance and sewer line services are provided by the
City. Unified Sewerage Agency is responsible for sewage treatment through a contract with the City. Your
sewer billing will be handled through a City billing process instead of through the County tax bill. Water
service will continue through the Tigard Water Department as before.
The City of Tigard's Library and its association with the Washington County Library Service offers you first-
rate library service and access to just about any subject. Our Finance and Administration Departments
are oriented to good citizen service and we ask that you not hesitate to call 639-4171 if you have any
questions or concerns.
Once again, I wish you a sincer Llcome.
i
Sinc ~ ly, /
~ ,
James Nicoli Y~
Mayor
~
enclosure
jo\h:ldocs\welcome
13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772
PORTLAND METROPOLAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT A DARY COMMISSION.
800 NE OREGON ST #16 (STE 540), PORTLAND OR 97232-TEL: 731-4093
FINAL ORDER
RE: BOUNDARY CHANGE PROPOSAL N0: 3530 - Annexation of territory to the City of Tigard.
Proceedings on Proposal No. 3530 commenced upon receipt by the Boundary Commission of a I,
resolution and property owner/registered voter consent from the City on September 15, 1995, ,
requesting that certain property be annexed to the City. The resolution and consent meets the i
requirements for initiating a proposal set forth in ORS 199.490, particularly Section (2)(a)(B).
Upon receipt of the petition the Boundary Commission published and posted notice of the public
hearing in accordance with ORS 199.463 and conducted a public hearing on the proposal on
October 19, 1995. The Commission also caused a study to be made on this proposal which
considered economic, demographic and sociological trends and projections and physical
development of the land.
The Commission reviewed this proposal in light of the following statutory guidance:
"199.410 Policy. (1) The Legislative Assembly finds that:
"(a) A fragmented approach has developed to public services provided by local
~ government. Fragmentation results in duplications in services, unequal tax bases and
resistance to cooperation and is a barrier to planning implementation. Such an
approach has limited the orderly development and growth of Oregon's urban areas to
the detriment of the citizens of this state.
"(b) The programs and growth of each unit of local government affect not only
that particular unit but also activities and programs of a variety of other units within
each urban area.
"(c) As local programs become increasingly intergovernmental, the state has a
responsibility to insure orderly determination and adjustment of local government
boundaries to best meet the needs of the people.
"(d) Local comprehensive plans define local land uses but may not specify which
units of local government are to provide public services when these services are
required.
"(e) Urban population densities and intensive development require a broad
spectrum and high level of community services and controls. When areas become
urbanized and require the full range of community services, priorities are required
regarding the type and levels of services that the residents need and desire.
Community service priorities need to be established by weighing the total service needs
against the total financial resources available for securing services. Those service
priorities are required to reflect local circumstances, conditions and limited financial ~
resources. A single governmental agency, rather than several governmental agencies is
in most cases better able to assess the financial resources and therefore is the best
mechanism for establishing community service priorities. Final Order - Page 1
T •
~ ~ .
"(2) It is the intent of the Legislative Assembly that each oundary commission
establish policies and exercise its powers under this chapter in order to create a
governmental structure that promotes efficiency and economy in providing the widest
range of necessary services in a manner that encourages and provides planned, well-
ordered and efficient development patterns.
"(3) The purposes of ORS 199.410 to 199.534 are to:
"(a) Provide a method for guiding the creation and growth of cities and special
service districts in Oregon in order to prevent illogical extensions of local government
boundaries and to encourage the reorganization of overlapping governmental agencies;
"(b) Assure adequate quality and quantity of public services and the financial
integrity of each unit of local government;
"(c) Provide an impartial forum for the resolution of local government jurisdictional
questions;
"(d) Provide that boundary determinations are consistent with acknowledged
local comprehensive plans and are in conformance with state-wide planning goals. In
making boundary determinations the commission shall first consider the acknowledged
comprehensive plan for consistency of its action. Only when the acknowledged local
comprehensive plan provides inadequate policy direction shall the commission consider
the statewide planning goals. The commission shall consider the timing, phasing and
availability of services in making a boundary determination; and
"(e) Reduce the fragmented approach to service delivery by encouraging single
agency service delivery over service delivery by several agencies.
"199.462 Standards for review of changes; territory which may not be included in
certain changes. (1) In order to carry out the purposes described by ORS 199.410
when reviewing a petition for a boundary change or application under ORS 199.464, a
boundary commission shall consider local comprehensive planning for the area,
economic, demographic and sociological trends and projections pertinent to the
proposal, past and prospective physical development of land that would directly or
indirectly be affected by the proposed boundary change or application under ORS
199.464 and the goals adopted under ORS 197.225." I
"(2) Subject to any provision to the contrary in the principat Act of the affected I
district or city and subject to the process of transfer of territory:
"(a) Territory within a city may not be included within or annexed to a district
without the consent of the city council;'
"(b) Territory within a city may not be included within or annexed to another city;
and I
I
"(c) Territory within a district may not be included within or annexed to another ,
district subject to the same principal Act."
I
Final Order - Page 2
~ , •
' The Commission also considerr,Td its Policies adopted under Administoive Procedures Act
(specifically 193-05-000 to 193-05-015), historical trends of boundary commission operations and
decisions and past direct and indirect instructions of the State Legislature in arriving at its decision.
FINDINGS
(See Findings in Exhibit "A" attached hereto).
REASONS FOR DECISION
(See Reasons for Decision in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.)
RD
O ER
On the basis of the Findings and Reasons for Decision listed in Exhibit "A", the Boundary
Commission approved Boundary Change Proposal No. 3530 on October 19, 1995.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED THAT the territory described in Exhibit "B" and depicted on the
attached map, be annexed to the City of Tigard as of November 8, 1995
PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT
BOUNDARY COMMISSION
DATE:
ha r
T'
ATTEST:
" The potential effective date of this annexation (October 19th) falls within 61 days of the
November 7th election. ORS 199.519 prohibits boundary changes from taking effect within
this time period.
Final Order - Page 3
I
• ' • ~
Exhibit A
Proposal No. 3530
FINDINGS
Based on the study and the public hearing the Commission found:
1. The territory to be annexed contains 1.88 acres, 1 single family dwelling, an estimated
population of 2, and has an assessed value of $227,110.
2. The applicant wishes to receive City services to facilitate development. One additional single-
family residence is planned.
' 3. The Boundary Commission has three adopted policies. The first of these policies states that
the Commission generally sees cities as the primary providers of urban services. Recognizing
that growth of cities may cause financial problems for the districts, the Commission states in
the second policy that the Commission will help find solutions to the problems. The third
policy states that the Commission may approve illogical boundaries in the short term if these
lead to logical service arrangements in the long term.
4. The territory is within the regional Urban Growth Boundary and the boundary of Metro.
5. The territory is included in the Urban Area of the Washington County Comprehensive Plan
and is within the Bull Mountain Community Planning area. The site is designated R-6, 6 units
per acre with a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet on the Community Plan map.
Washington County has a single designation for planning and zoning.
Major development concerns, community design considerations and the land use prescrip-
tions created to address them which are specific to the Bull Mountain community are
addressed as "Community Design Elements" in the community plan. Some of the Communi-
ty Design Elements apply to the whole Planning Area, while others are specific to subareas.
The subject territory is within the "Summit and Slopes" subarea.
The site is also designated as a"Significant Natural Area" on the Bull Mountain Community
Plan.
6. Washington County reviewed its role in service provision in its Countv 2000 program. In this i
document, the County adopted a policy of supporting a service delivery system which
distinguishes between municipal and county-wide services to achieve tax fairness and
expenditure equity in the provision of public services. The County policy states that
municipal services should be provided either by cities or special districts.
7. The City of Tigard and Washington County have entered into an Urban Planning Area
Agreement (UPAA) which is a part of both the County's and Tigard's adopted Comprehensive
Plans. The UPAA sets out an "Active Planning Area" within which the City assumes
responsibility for land use planning, and an "Area of Interest" in which the County agrees to
coordinate its planning because of the potential impacts on Tigard. This proposal falls within
Tigard's "Area of Interest" as shown in the UPAA.
Final Order - Page 4 I
• , ~ •
Exhibit A
Proposal No. 3530
8. The City of Tigard has a"city limits" plan. The County's plan and ordinances remain
applicable unless the City takes other action after the annexation is effective. The City's plan
has been reviewed to determine whether it contains provisions consistent with the Bull
Mountain Community Plan. The City has policies requiring new development to be serviced
with sewer and water.
The Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies relevant to this case are policies 2.1.1 (Citizen
Involvement); 10.1.1 (Service Delivery Capacity), • and 10.1.2 (BoundarY Criteria). The
pertinent Tigard Community Development Code sections are Chapters 18.136 (Annexations);
and 18.138 (Established/Developing Area Classification).
9. The City of Tigard staff has indicated to the applicant that the City zoning which most closely
conforms to the current County zoning for this territory would be R-7 (minimum 5,000 sq.ft.
lot size).
10. On July 14, 1986, Tigard adopted an Urban Services Policy deelaring its willingness to plan
and ultimately provide urban services in an area around the current City limits. The area
proposed for annexation falls within the territory covered by this policy. In addition, Tigard
has conducted an Urban Services Studv covering the study area. The study describes the
area and discusses annexation, service provision, expenditure requirements and revenue
projections.
11. Sewer service will be available via an 8-inch City line in a street (as yet un-named) which is
under construction in the Hillshire Woods subdivision. This street is approximately 40 feet to
the east, and a 4-inch stub line is planned to connect the sewer to the territory to be ,
annexed.
The territory is within the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) which has a standard agreement I
between the Agency and the large cities within the Agency (Beaverton, Comelius, Forest
Grove, Hillsboro, Tigard, Tualatin and Sherwood). In that agreement the Cities agree to: 1) '
comply with the Agency's construction and maintenance standards for sanitary and storm
water sewer facilities, 2) follow and accomplish the Agency's work program for storm and
surface water, 3) obtain the Agency's consent before issuing construction permits within
wetlands, floodways and floodplains. The agreement provides that the city owns and is
responsible for sanitary sewer lines under 24 inches in diameter within the City limits and for
storm water facilities within the City limits as identified on a map (virtually all facilities). The
Unified Sewerage Agency is responsible for all industrial waste discharges, both in and out of
cities. The Unified Sewerage Agency agreed not to extend sanitary sewer service to areas
outside the City within the City's Urban Planning Area unless the City approves.
The City must pass over to the Agency a portion of the sanitary sewer service charges, storm
sewer charges, sanitary sewer connection fees and storm sewer connection fees collected by
the City. The City may charge charges and fees higher than those charged by the Agency
and retain the additional revenues.
Final Order - Page 5
' . • • A
Exhibit
Proposal No. 3530
USA assesses a property tax which goes toward payment of bonds sold to construct district-
wide major improvements and regional treatment plants. For the 1994-95 tax year, this tax
is $0.0681 per thousand assessed value. Recent new facilities constructed to meet federal
Clean Water Act standards were financed by revenue bonds. These bonds are repaid from
the District's monthly sewer user charges.
12. The site can receive water service via an 8-inch water line in a street (as yet un-named)
which is under construction in the Hillshire Woods subdivision. This street is approximately
40 feet to the east of the site.
The territory is within the boundary of the Tigard Water District. The City of Tigard, which
' was previously served by the District, has withdrawn the territory within the City from the
District and established a Tigard Water Department. The City of Tigard has an intergovern-
mental agreement with the Tigard Water District which provides for services within the
District by the City. Tigard also has an agreement with Durham and King City, which have
also withdrawn from the District, to provide water services within those cities. Subsequent
to annexation it is the intent of the City to withdraw the territory from the District as
provided for in ORS 222.
The term of the City/District agreement is until December 31, 2018. The agreement
establishes an intergovernmental water board (IWB) consisting of five members, one from
, each of the city councils (Tigard, Durham, and King City) and from the Tigard Water District
Board plus one at-large member. The IWB makes recommendations to the City Council on
water service issues. The District agreed to transfer to the City of Tigard assets that are
necessary to the operation of the City's water system, including water supply contracts, but
to retain its other assets located within the remaining District. All District employees were
transferred to Tigard. The District agreed that the Tigard Water Department would manage
all the assets. If the District or Durham or King City terminate their agreement with Tigard,
the system assets will be proportionately distributed. The agreement provides that the fees,
rates and charges for water service to the District, Durham and King City will be the same as
those charged within Tigard. However, the charges may be higher when the cost of providing
service is higher because of unusual circumstances, including added costs to pump water up
hill. The agreement covers the original boundary of the District, at the time of the Agree-
ment/withdrawals. It specifically provides that Tigard has no obligation to serve water to I
areas annexed to the District after the date of the agreement. Extensive storage exists in several locations on Bull Mountain which provides adequate
volume and pressure of water to serve this area. Specifically, the 10 million gallon Terminal
reservoir near Bull Mountain Road and Hazeltree Street at elevation 470 feet, and the 1.1
million gallon High Tor reservoir at elevation 713 feet will provide service to this area.
Currently the City charges in the Bull Mountain area include a $1000 system development
charge plus a $250 installation fee for a total installation charge of $1,250 for a standard ,
I 5/8" or 3/4" meter. The monthly user charge is $6.50 for the first 400 cubic feet of water
and then $1.20 per 100 cubic feet of water.
Final Order - Page 6
• , ~ •
Exhibit A
Proposal No. 3530
13. Upon annexation to the City, the territory will be automatically withdrawn from the Washing-
ton County Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District and the District's $ .8367 per thousand
property tax will no longer be levied against the territory. The County Service District
provides a level of service of .51 officers per 1000 population which in addition to the
general County level of .43 officers per 1000 population means that the current level is .94
officer per 1000 population.
Subsequent to annexation, the Tigard Police Department will provide police protection to the
territory. Tigard provides a service level of 1.3 officers per thousand population. Emergen-
cy response in Tigard is under five minutes.
14. The territory is within the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District. Annexation will not affect
this service because the City is in the District.
15. The territory is within the boundary of the Washington County Urban Road Maintenance
District. Upon annexation the territory will be automatically withdrawn from the District, and
the District's levy of $.3229 per $1000 assessed value will no longer apply to the property.
Upon annexation and withdrawal from the District, the County's policy is to retain jurisdiction
over arterials and major collectors. The County does not desire jurisdiction over local roads.
SW Fern Street is designated as a"local street" on the County's Transportation Plan Map,
and defined as intended to provide direct property access. A local street is not intended
to serve through traffic." The City finances road maintenance from gas taxes.
16. The territory is within the boundary of the Washington County Vector Control District. Tigard
is not a part of the District. Upon annexation, the territory will be automatically withdrawn
from the unfunded Washington County Vector Control District.
I 17. The territory is within the Washington County Service District #1 for street lights. The
District provides services to areas within its boundary which request street lighting services.
The District uses local improvement districts to finance the service. The District does not provide street lights in the subject territory. Upon annexation it will be automatically
withdrawn from the District.
The City provides street lighting service out of its Street fund which receives State shared
gasoline tax revenues as its primary revenue source. Street lights are required by the City in
residential subdivisions. Upon installation of street lights by a developer to City standards,
the City accepts dedication of the street lights and takes on ongoing operation and mainte-
nance costs.
18. Tigard operates a park system funded through its tax base which finances the general fund.
Tigard has 6 developed recreation park sites.
19. The site can receive water service via an 12-inch storm line in a street (as yet un-named)
which is under construction in the Hillshire Woods subdivision. This street is approximately
Final Order - Page 7
. • •
Exhibit A i
Proposal No. 3530
40 feet to the east of the site. The Unified Sewerage Agency levies an annuai assessment
for storm drainage services of $36 per dwelling unit of which $24 goes to the City.
I
REASONS FOR DECISION li
i
Based on the Findings the Commission determined: I
1. The proposal is consistent with City, County, and Regional planning for the area.
2. The City can provide an adequate quantity and quality of public services to the area.
3. The proposal is consistent with the Boundary Commission Policy On Incorporated Status
(OAR 193-05-005) and the Policy On Long Term/Long Range Governmental Structure (OAR
p193-05-015).
i
Final Order - Page 8
• ' • ~
Exhibit B
Proposal No. 3530
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ANNEXATION TO
City of Tigard
A tract of land situated in the Northwest one-quarter of Section 4,
' Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington
County, Oregon described as follows:
Beginning at the West one-quarter Corner of Section 4, T 2 S,
,R 1 W of the Willamette Meridian thence N 89° 43' 30" E a
distance of 100.00 feet to the True Point of Beginniag; thence N
890 43130" E a distance of 300.00 feet to the west line of Lot 18
Handy Acres; thence N 000 42' 55" E a distance of 200 feet;
thence S 890 43' 30" W a distance of 250 feet thence N 00° 43'
00" 435.76 feet to the south right-of-way of S.W. Fern Street;
thence S 890 37' 00" W, along said southright-of-way, a distance
of 50.00 feet; thence S 000 43' a distance of 635.67 feet to the
. true point of beginning.
Final Order - Page 9
I
• •
PROPOSAL ■ 3530
SW 1/4 NW 1/4 SECTION 4 T2S R 1 W W.M. 2S 1 4BC
Washington County
~
Scale: 1 200'
• ~N~ ~)O W ~~G6I'-- I~OG' ~IO.P'
/ ,oo ~w.w' • iro.a. ~ro ~roor ~ a i.io . gpp 300 200 100
~ ,
/.IS AC .19 L~ !!I IG 1.0o AG
' I90 JC ~ K PI! dG 157 14
lo aenc
TIGARD b 400
Z ~ p ~s II ~,.,.9 s S $
~ 12 eoo
~ 15 i zl i3 ~ rl r\ ~I Y
~ lu n~es 1 ' , I
Z r .td pb.
G I P ~i
0 iR.~O ~a~
Q 1900
2100 o•
I ' .16 IL: tm K br . `
~ w
•'I_~~. _,a_ ~ JTR
4
2\00 ~qa, l
.K.G w,
' 2500a'e• .
' • ,
L ~wor I^ ~ ;
R i
I600
s i s.W. .94 X wl - I zooo I
isoo ~ z,r ,r. ~
.cr I
~ 1300 amaY 1000 .9S AC ' 1800
W ew Ae 1.J0 d~. IW AC'
3 ~ ~ : ~ 2600
~ = A !.!s Ac
1700
a' I 109K 21 R g Z2200
I aLf~
I ~ tur
20 = 23 ti
izoo n ~ ~~o• 24 i
R 1.s sc -8 19 2000 I
17 g Ia
~l C R r J
W
J
J
j .'iioo~
W :~:tie Ac
Z I
z AREA TO BE
C)
m
ANNEXED
.11171
PROPOSAL N0, 3530 I
CITY OF TIGARD
ANNEXATION
FIGURE 2
~
• 1
• •
0
October 19, 1995 Hearing
, PROPOSAL NO. 3530 - CITY OF TtGARD - Annexation
~ Petitioner: City of Tigard; Harry & Judith Jeffery
90th Day: December 14, 1995
Proposa! No. 3530 was initiated by a resolution of the Tigard City Council and a consent
petition of the property owners and registered voters. The resolution and petitions meet
the requirement for initiation set forth in ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B) [double majority annexation
law]. If the Commission approves the proposal, the boundary change will become
effective on the date of approval, subject to the provisions of ORS 199.519.
The territory to be annexed is located generally on the west edge of the City , on the south
edge of SW Fern Street, west of SW 135th Avenue. The territory contains 1.88 acres, 1
single family dwelling, an estimated population of 2, and has an assessed value of
$227,1 10.
REASON FOR ANNEXATION
The applicant wishes to receive City services to facilitate development. One additional
sirgle-farr;ify residence is planned.
BOUNDARY COMMISSION POLICIES
The Boundary Commission has three adopted policies. The first of these policies states .
that the Commission generally sees cities as the primary providers of urban services.
Recognizing that growth of cities may cause financial problems for the districts, the
Commission states in the second policy that the Commission will help find solutions to the
problems. The third policy states that the Commission may approve illogical boundaries in
the short term if these lead to logical service arrangements in the long term.
LAND USE PLANNING
Site Characteristics. The site slopes downward from east to west/northwest. There is a
wooded area running north to south through the middle of the site. Land use on sur-
rounding territories is as follows:
Proposal No. 3530 - Page 1
ti
• ,
• ,
North: Single-family residences on Tax Lots 1200 and 1300; Tax Lot 900, across
Fern Street, is part of the Hillshire Woods subdivision.
East: Being developed as part of the Hillshire Woods subdivision.
~ West: BPA and PGE power easements and large lot parcels 0 -10 acres) in unincor-
porated Washington County.
South: Being developed as part of the Hillshire Woods subdivision.
Re4ional Plannina. The territory is within the regional Urban Growth Boundary and the
boundary of Metro. '
Washinqton Countv Plannin4. The territory is included in the Urban Area of the Washing-
ton County Comprehensive Plan and is within the Bull Mountain Community Planning area.
The site is designated R-6, 6 units per acre with a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet
on the Community Plan map. Washington County has a single designation for planning
and zoning.
Major development concerns, community design considerations and the land use prescrip-
tions created to address them which are specific to the Bull Mountain community are
addressed as "Community Design Elements" in the community plan. Some of the
Community Design Elements apply to the whole Planning Area, while others are specific to
subareas. The subject territory is within the "Summit and Slopes" subarea. The following
are pertinent general and subarea provisions from the Community Plan:
General Design Elements
1. In the design of new development, floodplains, drainage hazard areas, streams and
their tributaries, riparian zories and wooded areas, steep slopes, scenic features, and
powerline easements and right-of-way shall be:
a. used to accent, define, or separate areas of differing residential densities and '
differing planned land uses;
b. preserved and protected and
c. where appropriate, interconnected.. .
5. All new subdivisions shall provide for pedestrian pathways...
9. new development within the Planning Area, with the exception of construction
of a detached residence on a lot of record, shall be required to conneci to public
water and sewer service.. .
10. New development shall dedicate right-of-way for road extensions and alignments
indicated on Washington County's Transportation Plan or the Bull Mountain Commu-
Proposal No. 3530 - Page 2
. • • .
nity Plan. New development shall also be subject to conditions set forth in the
County's growth management policies during the development review process.
11. The County shall emphasize non-auto (transit, bicycle, and pedestrian) measures as
an interim solution to circulation issues...
16. Open space shall be used for a variety of recreational activities, the protection of
wildlife habitat or aesthetic purposes, such as scenic views.
SUMMIT AND SLOPES
• iF M
Design Elements:
1. The residential character of this subarea is to be protected. Improvement of
roadways should be done in a manner which does not encourage excessive through
traffic. all the roads planned for improvement or connection to Bull Mountain
Road within the Planning Area should be constructed as minor collectors or local
streets following the topography generally and not directly aligned with other major
roadways.
2. Hillside building techniques and foundation designs such as stilts, stepped founda-
tions, etc., shall be used to minimize the alteration of existing slopes over 20
percent.
3. No grading, filling, clearing, or excavation of any kind shall be initiated on steep
slopes until a grading plan, as defined in the Community Development Code, is
approved. Borrowing to obtain fill material shall be prohibited unless the material is
obtained from a cut permitted under an approved grading plan, or imporied from
outside the hillside area.
4. Removal of natural vegetation shall be minimized, existing vegetation protected and
destroyed vegetation replaced. A slope stabilization and revegetation plan,
which includes a schedule for revegetation after areas have been cleared, shall be
included with the required grading plan.
5. Because trees are such an important natural and scenic resource on Bull Mountain,
development in areas of standing trees shall be designed to minimize the number of
trees to be cut. At the time of development, no more than fifty percent of the
mature standing trees (six inch diameter or greater) shall be removed from any
' parcel. Development design and clearing for structures shall provide for maximum
retention of old growth trees. Prior to development, the harvesting of forest tree
species for their commercial value shall be in accord with the Oregon Forest Practic-
es Aci. The slope stabilization and revegetation plan shall indicate the mature trees
planned for removal and describe the replacement programs. Replacement trees
must be of at least 1-1 /2 inch diameter.
6. Streams, seasonal waterways and immediately adjacent riparian zones, as defined in
the Community Development Code, shall be preserved in their natural condition
Proposal No. 3530 - Page 3 ,
~ .
~ ~ .
including topography and vegetation. Where roads are required, bridges shall be the
preferred means of crossing streams and waterways rather than infill and piping or
channelization of waterflow.
7. Use of powerline easements for farm operations, open space, and wildlife habitat
shall be encouraged as appropriate in this subarea.
The site is also designated as a"Significant Natural Area", on the Bull Mountain Community
Plan, and described as follows:
Sites of special importance, in their natural condition, for their ecologic, scientific,
and educational value.
Countv 2000. Washington County reviewed its role in service provision in its County
2000 program. In this document, the County adopted a policy of supporting a service
delivery system which distinguishes between municipal and county-wide services to
achieve tax fairness and expenditure equity in the provision of public services. The County
policy states that municipal services should be provided either by cities or special districts.
Urban Planning Area Agreement. The City of Tigard and Washington County have entered
into an Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) which is a part of both the County's and
Tigard's adopted Comprehensive Plans. The UPAA sets out an "Active Planning Area"
within wnich the City assumes responsibiiity for land use plannirig, and an "Area of
Interest" in which the County agrees to coordinate its planning because of the potential
impacts on Tigard. This proposal falls within Tigard's "Area of Interest" as shown in the
UPAA. The following pertinent provisions are from Section B, "Area of Interest" portion of
the UPAA:
B. Area of Interest
1. Definition
Area of Interest or Primarv Area of Interest means unincorporated lands contig-
uous to the Active Planning Area in which the CITY does not conduct compre-
hensive planning but in which the CITY does maintain an interest in comprehen- I
sive planning and development actions by the COUNTY because of potential
impacts on the CITY Active Planning Area...
2. The COUNTY shall be responsible for comprehensive planning and development
actions within the Area of Interest.
3. The COUNTY is responsible for the preparation, adoption and amendment of
the public facility plan required by OAR 660-11 within the Area of Interest.
Proposal No. 3530 - Page 4
.
. r
.
. •
4. The CITY may consider requests for annexations in the Area of Interest subject
to the following:
a. The CITY shall not require annexation of lands in the Area of
Interest as a condition to the provision of urban services for
development.
b. Annexations by the CITY within the Area of Interest shall not
create islands unless the CITY declares its intent to complete
the island annexation.
iF ♦ R
d. Upon annexation of land within the Area of Interest to the
CITY, the CITY agrees to convert COUNTY plan designations
to CITY plan designations which most closely approximate
the density, use provisions and standards of COUNTY desig-
nations. Furthermore, the CITY agrees to maintain this desig-
nation for one year after the effective date of annexation
unless both the CITY and the COUNTY Planning Directors
agree at the time of annexation that the COUNTY designation
is outdated and an amendment may be initiated before the
one year period is over.
IV. Amendments to the Urban PlanninQ Area Aqreement
r~. •
B. Prior to the commencement of periodic review for the Citv of TiQard and the
Countv's Urban Areas (April. 1989), the CITY and the COUNTY shall mutually study
the following topics:
1. The feasibility of expanding the "active planning area" to include the current
"area of interest" and assigning land use planning responsibility to the CITY.
2. The feasibility and cost-effectiveness of the CITY and the COUNTY contracting
to provide building inspection and plan review services, administer development
codes and collect related fees within the active planning area.
Proposed revisions to this Agreement shall be considered by the CITY and the
COUNTY as soon as anatysis of the above topics is complete, subject to the
time constraint and other requirements of the COUNTY's land use ordinance
hearings and adoption process.
C. The parties will jointly review this Agreement every two (2) years, or more frequent-
ly if mutually needed, to evaluate the effectiveness of the processes set forth herein
and to make any necessary amendments. The review process shall commence two
(2) years from the date of execution and shall be completed within 60 days. Both
Proposal No. 3530 - Page 5
'J
• • .
parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve any inconsistencies that may have
developed since the previous review. If, after completion of the 60 day review
period inconsistencies still remain, either party may terminate this Agreement.
Citv of Tiaard Planning. The City of Tigard has a"city limits" plan. The County's plan and
ordinances remain applicable unless the City takes other action after the annexation is
effective. The City's plan has been reviewed to determine whether it contains provisions
consistent with the Bull Mountain Community Plan. The City has policies requiring new
development to be serviced with sewer and water. Policy 7.1.2 states that as a pre-
condition to development the City shall require that:
a. Development coincide with the availability of adequate service capacity including:
1. Public water;
2. Public sewer shall be required for new development within the city unless the
property involved is over 300 feet from a sewer line and Washington County
Health Department approval for a private disposal system is obtained; and
3. Storm drainage.
b. The facilities are:
1. Capable of adequately servicing all intervening properties and the proposed
development; and
2. Designed to city standards
c. All new development utilities to be placed underground.
With regard to natural areas the City's Plan contains the following policy and implementa-
tion strategy:
Policy 3.4.1.b The City shall require that development proposals in designated timbered
or tree areas be reviewed through the planned development process to minimize the number
of trees removed;
Implementation strategy 4: Where there exist large or unique stands of trees or major
vegetation areas within the planning area on undeveloped land, the City shall ensure that
development proposals do not substantially alter the character of the vegetation areas
through the planned development process and the "tree cutting" section of the Community
Development Code.
The Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies relevant to this case are policies 2.1 .1 (Citizen Involve-
ment); 10.1.1 (Service Delivery Capacity); and 10.1.2 (Boundary Criteria). The pertinent Tigard I
Community Development Code sections are Chapters 18.136 (Annexations); and 18.138 (Estab-
lished/Developing Area Classification).
For the Boundary Commission's reference, the annexation policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan
(Policies 10.1.1 and 10.1.2) are provided here:
10.1 Prior to the annexation of land to the City of Tigard: .
Proposal No. 3530 - Page 6
• •
a. The city shall review each of the following services as to adequate capacity, or
such services to be made available, to serve the parcel if developed to the most
intense use allowed, and will not significantly reduce the level of services
available to developed and undeveloped land within the City of Tigard. The
services are:
1. water;
2. sewer;
3. drainage
4. streets;
5. police; and
6. fire protection.
b. If required by an adopted capital improvements program ordinance, the appli-
cant shall sign and record with Washington County a nonremonstrance agree-
ment regarding the following:
1. The formation of a local improvement district (L.I.D.) for any
of the following services that could be provided through such
a district. The extension or improvement of the following:
a) water;
b) sewer;
c) drainage; and
d) streets.
10.1.2 Approval of proposed annexations of land by the city shall be based on findings with
respect to the following: .
a. The annexation eliminates an existing "pocket" or "island" of unincorporated
territory; or
b. The annexation will not create an irregular boundary that makes it difficult for
the police in an emergency situation to determine whether the parcel is within
or outside the city;
c. The police department has commented upon the annexation;
d. The land is located within the Tigard urban planning area and is contiguous to
the city boundary;
~ e. The annexation can be accommodated by the services listed in 10.1.1(a).
10.1.3 Upon annexation of land into the city which carries a Washington County zoning
designation, the City of Tigard shall assign the City of Tigard zoning district designa-
tion which most closely conforms to the county zoning designation.
The City of Tigard staff has indicated to the applicant that the City zoning which most
closely conforms to the current County zoning for this territory would be R-7 (minimum
5,000 sq.ft. lot size).
Proposal No. 3530 - Page 7
~ .
Citv of Tiqard Urban Services Policv. On July 14, 1986, Tigard adopted an Urban Services
Policy declaring its willingness to plan and ultimately provide urban services in an area
around the current City limits. The area proposed for annexation falls within the territory
covered by this policy. In addition, Tigard has conducted an Urban Services Studv
covering the study area. The study describes the area and discusses annexation, service '
provision, expenditure requirements and revenue projections. ~FACILITIES AND SERVICES
Sanitarv Sewer Service. Service will be available via an 8-inch City line in a street (as yet
un-named) which is under construction in the Hillshire Woods subdivision. This street is
approximately 40 feet to the east, and a 4-inch stub line is planned to connect the sewer
to the territory to be annexed. The territory is within the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) which has a standard agree-
ment between the Agency and the large cities within the Agency (Beaverton, Cornelius,
Forest Grove, Hillsboro, Tigard, Tualatin and Sherwood). In that agreement the Cities
agree to: 1) comply with the Agency's construction and maintenance standards for
sanitary and storm water sewer facilities, 2) follow and accomplish the Agency's work
program for storm and surface water, 3) obtain the Agency's consent before issuing
construction permits within wetlands, floodways and floodplains. The agreement provides
that the city owns and is responsible for sanitary sewer lines under 24 inches in diameter
within the City limits and for storm water facilities within the City limits as identified on a
map (virtually all facilities). The Unified Sewerage Agency is responsible for all indu.strial
waste discharges, both in and out of cities. The Unified Sewerage Agency agreed not to
extend sanitary sewer service to areas outside the City within the City's Urban Planning
Area unless the City approves.
The City must pass over to the Agency a portion of the sanitary sewer service charges,
storm sewer charges, sanitary sewer connection fees and storm sewer connection fees
collected by the City. The City may charge charges and fees higher than those charged by
the Agency and retain the additional revenues.
USA assesses a property tax which goes toward payment of bonds sold to construct
district-wide major improvements and regional treatment plants. For the 1994-95 tax year,
this tax is $0.0681 per thousand assessed value. Recent new facilities constructed to ~
meet federal Clean Water Act standards were financed by revenue bonds. These bonds '
are repaid from the District's monthly sewer user charges.
Water Service. The site can receive water service via an 8-inch water line in a street (as
yet un-named) which is under construction in the Hillshire Woods subdivision. This street
is approximately 40 feet to the east of the site.
The territory is within the boundary of the Tigard Water District. The City of Tigard, which
was previously served by the District, has withdrawn the territory within the City from the
Proposal No. 3530 - Page 8
1
'
• • •
District and established a Tigard Water Department. The City of Tigard has an intergovern-
mental agreement with the Tigard Water District which provides for services within the
District by the City. Tigard also has an agreement with Durham and King City, which
have also withdrawn from the District, to provide water services within those cities.
Subsequent to annexation it is the intent of the City to withdraw the territory from the
' District as provided for in ORS 222.
The term of the City/District agreement is until December 31, 2018. The agreement
establishes an intergovernmental water board (IWB) consisting of five members, one from
each of the city councils (Tigard, Durham, and King City) and from the Tigard Water
District Board plus one at-large member. The IWB makes recommendations to the City
Council on water service issues. The District agreed to transfer to the City of Tigard
assets that are necessary to the operation of the City's water system, including water
supply contracts, but to retain its other assets located within the remaining District. All
District employees were transferred to Tigard. The District agreed that the Tigard Water
Department would manage all the assets. If the District or Durham or King City terminate
their agreement with Tigard, the system assets will be proportionately distributed. The
agreement provides that the fees, rates and charges for water service to the District,
Durham and King City will be the same as those charged within Tigard. However, the
charges may be higher when the cost of providing service is higher because of unusual
circumstances, including added costs to pump water up hill. The agreement covers the
original boundary of the District, at the time of the Agreement/withdrawals. It specifically
provides that Tigard has no obligation to serve water to areas annexed to the District after
the date of the agreement.
The City has water available to serve the other portions of this area from lines in existing
subdivisions to the east and south. Extensive storage exists in several locations on Bull
Mountain which provides adequate volume and pressure of water to serve this area.
Specifically, the 10 million gallon Terminal reservoir near Bull Mountain Road and Hazeltree
Street at elevation 470 feet, and the 1.1 million gallon High Tor reservoir at elevation 713
feet will provide service to this area.
Currently the City charges in the Bull Mountain area include a $1000 system development
charge plus a $250 installation fee for a total installation charge of $1 ,250 for a standard
5/8" or 3/4" meter. The monthly user charge is $6.50 for the first 400 cubic feet of water
and then $1.20 per 100 cubic feet of water.
Police Service. Upon annexation to the City, the territory will be automatically withdrawn
from the Washington County Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District and the District's $ .8367
per thousand property tax will no longer be levied against the territory. The County
Service District provides a level of service of .51 officers per 1000 population which in
addition to the general County level of .43 officers per 1000 population means that the
current level is .94 officer per 1000 population.
Subsequent to annexation, the Tigard Police Department will provide police protection to
the territory. Tigard provides a service level of 1.3 officers per thousand population.
Emergency response in Tigard is under five minutes.
Proposal No. 3530 - Page 9
'l
Fire. The territory is within the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District. Annexation will
not affect this service because the City is in the District.
~
Roads. The territory is within the boundary of the Washington County Urban Road
Maintenance District. Upon annexation the territory will be automatically withdrawn from
the District, and the District's levy of $.3229 per $1000 assessed value will no longer
apply to the property.
Upon annexation and withdrawal from the District, the County's policy is to retain
jurisdiction over arterials and major collectors. The County does not desire jurisdiction over
local roads. SW Fern Street is designated as a"local street" on the County's Transporta-
tion Plan Map, and defined as intended to provide direct property access. A local
street is not intended to serve through traffic." The City finances road maintenance from
gas taxes.
Vector Control. The territory is within the boundary of the Washington County Vector
Controf District. Tigard is not a part of the District. Upon annexation, the territory will be
automatically withdrawn from the unfunded Washington County Vector Control District.
Street Liqhts. The territory is within the Washington County Service District #1 for street
lights. The District provides services to areas within its boundary which request street
lighting services. The District uses local improvement districts to finance the service. The
District does not provide street lights in the subject territory. Upon annexation it will be
automatically withdrawn from the District.
The City provides street lighting service out of its Street fund which receives State shared
gasoline tax revenues as its primary revenue source. Street lights are required by the City
in residential subdivisions. Upon installation of street lights by a developer to City
standards, the City accepts dedication of the street lights and takes on ongoing operation
and maintenance costs.
Parks. Tigard operates a park system funded through its tax base which finances the
general fund. Tigard has 6 developed recreation park sites as follows:
A. Cook Park has 51 acres. It is the City's largest park and is located on the Tualatin
River. The site is heavily wooded along the river and the southeast portion of the
park. Improvements to the park include ball fields, play equipment, paths, shelters,
cooking facilities, a boat launch and natural areas and trails. I
B. Summerlake Park has 27.82 acres. It has a shelter, cooking equipment, paths,
ballfields and 2 tennis courts.
C. Woodard Park has 26 acres, and contains play equipment and paths.
D. Fanno Creek Park has 20 acres. It has a large field, play equipment, paths, and
basketball and volley ball facilities.
E. Englewood Park has 15 acres, with playing fields, play equipment, and paths.
Proposal No. 3530 - Page 10
• •
F. Jack Park has 5.62 acres, play equipment, a shelter, paths, a basketball court and a
I volleyball facility.
Storm Drainaae. The site can receive storm water service via an 12-inch storm line in a
street (as yet un-named) which is under construction in the Hillshire Woods subdivision.
This street is approximately 40 feet to the east of the site. The Unified Sewerage Agency
levies an annual assessment for storm drainage services of $36 per dwelling unit of which
$24 9oes to the City.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the study and the proposed Findings and Reasons for Decisions found in Exhibit
A, the staff recommends that Proposal No. 3530 be approved.
Proposal No. 3530 - Page 11
~
3530
~
• ~ J
♦ .
~ . 1r\r' ~
11 ' ~
PF'opo .
10V 1S ( l J
C ~
~ f~~c` ~.,s+,a °"'c n'~ c..~a•~ c~. .u~P~- ~ r g
. A
r ~ ; w .~s•.. A ` ~ `
~ µwY + }`tt` • ,
~ ^ ~ . ° Y
j~ tonna u ~~-bJ ~ g g
.~oc~ou~ `p_ J~ ~~~vt y ~t. _ . ~i~ t~ osoaA si
covc ' _ g r c+• 'S ~
P ~"~7 Cqyy.~ll ~ti~~ ~M1~n11~ ~+i t f 2
w.
~ ~y~ 1 ` , ~L . r~wi~w~t• ~ r t,o~ ~ yi.
1
si. 1 .
~ {P
` v0~ ~.•'.~J~ ~ t
r
ry% ~ d' !pd• ~ • V'~
i
.~IGARp
Y Lt. °c
.rfi
Tp
p,RE A " ` ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~
, , ANN~xEp
~ Rutd'. r~ ..~~.t~+ _ •
. << c.f..r. .~Li ~
57.
Cl.
~ kOrl $~IOt( ~ C .
~ ~ M~CCf St. " ~
/\S: 1 ~ y ~ I~Niif • ~ / .1~'
1 S N ~ ( y
/ r.:~i l 1~ / cw~ • s
~ t.
r •.tlia~• I:M~A ~ M CI. {
Lv
~ ~ ' , st. ~ \ $ ~ ~
cr i ' fi'4': ~r S
~ . ~t . u~ • 4~ ~
z,. ~
~t ~ +rr . f $ r ^11V~ 4 /
~ 'I ~ i f•~ir~t ~s 1 \1 ( I
u' t1, !
rYM..,^~II
~ " 1 ~
~
V4~~
~
aaAeovE~ WN ~a 3530
~ ` t~ PROPOS FL. ~IGARD
\L ~ } ^ n
ANN~XATION
• 'r FIGURE 1
. .~r,".
cJ ' k~`Vy~ y4 ~
S~~ ' ~ ^l
. ~
~ •
PROPOSAL ~
■ 3530
SW 1/4 NW 1/4 SECTION 4 T2S R 1 W W.M. 2S 1 4BC
Washington County
Scale: 1 200'
. .
- vo.a' noo! ~rua
I . ~ro ,raor nor 1roor 200 100
Spp 300
~ ~ f!2 ~4 I.Od AC
~ ~0 9 2/l.1C L65 dC /.IJ AC .19 ~f^.
/90 .IC
irooe
'O .asx R
TIGARD 4~
z ~ g II ,..9 8
p ~ 8 12 7
,r
Q 15 I rl A 1~1 D
^ (CS 13i6] 1
i ~ • I
1t 1 4
Q ~Il.~o h•
Q 2100 na
I ~ 4 e
~ toe AC s _,~r _,a_ ~ sTRc ;
~ I 2100
,16 AC.
. . . F'~ 4'•' a I 2800
6 ewor I^ ~ ia l~a C
1600 Q ~ i
' g ~ s.w .9.,r I A i Z4~
~ I~y~ ~ .a ~
I Z /t AC.
xcoof
~~4°.~`' 1300 I400 .931C ~ I I800 J ~ o.
W [OI IC. 2.50 dC. /PO F:. -j ~
2600
1700 I 2.39 /C
= R
a I 409.aG R 2200 - - - -
21 ~ za ar~Z ~ur
I $ L 23
20
•
.Y
izoo _ 8 19 ^I ,~0 24
R 146 aC., ZppO
17 ia
~l ~ f 1 r ~ '
I
W
J I
Z J~
, ;1oo'
~ z
0 AREA TO BE I
X-N ANNEXED .
m
%
11 1~4 qwl • M~>' ]0' t
1
.
PROPOSAL N0, 3530
CITY OF TIGARD
ANNEXATION
FIGURE 2
,
.
. . ` •
Exhibit A
Proposal No. 3530
FINDINGS
Based on the study and the public hearing the Commission found:
1. The territory to be annexed contains 1.88 acres, 1 single family dwelling, an
estimated population of 2, and has an assessed value of $227,110.
2. The applicant wishes to receive City services to facilitate development. One
additional single-family residence is planned.
3. The Boundary Commission has three adopted policies. The first of these policies
states that the Commission generally sees cities as the primary providers of urban
services. Recognizing that growth of cities may cause financial problems for the
districts, the Commission states in the second policy that the Commission will help
find solutions to the problems. The third policy states that the Commission may
approve illogical boundaries in the short term if these lead to logical service arrange-
ments in the long term.
4. The territory is within the regional Urban Growth Boundary and the boundary of
Metro.
5. The territory is included in the Urban Area of the Washington County Comprehen-
sive Plan and is within the Bull Mountain Community Planning area. The site is
designated R-6, 6 units per acre with a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet on
the Community Plan map. Washington County has a single designation for planning
and zoning.
Major development concerns, community design considerations and the land use
prescriptions created to address them which are specific to the Bull Mountain
community are addressed as "Community Design Elements" in the community plan.
Some of the Community Design Elements apply to the whole Planning Area, while
others are specific to subareas. The subject territory is within the "Summit and
Slopes" subarea.
The site is also designated as a"Significant Natural Area" on the Bull Mountain
Community Plan.
6. Washington County reviewed its role in service provision in its Countv 2000
program. In this document, the County adopted a policy of supporting a service
delivery system which distinguishes between municipal and county-wide services to
achieve tax fairness and expenditure equity in the provision of public services. The
County policy states that municipal services should be provided either by cities or
special districts. Findings - Page 1 of 5
~
. !
-
~ •
Exhibit A
Proposal No. 3530
7. The City of Tigard and Washington County have entered into an Urban Planning
Area Agreement (UPAA) which is a part of both the County's and Tigard's adopted
Comprehensive Plans. The UPAA sets out an "Active Planning Area" within which
the City assumes responsibility for land use planning, and an "Area of Interest" in
which the County agrees to coordinate its planning because of the potential impacts
on Tigard. This proposal falls within Tigard's "Area of Interest" as shown in the
UPAA.
8. The City of Tigard has a"city limits" plan. The County's plan and ordinances
remain applicable unless the City takes other action after the annexation is effec-
tive. The City's plan has been reviewed to determine whether it contains provisions
consistent with the Bull Mountain Community Plan. The City has policies requiring
new devefopment to be serviced with sewer and water.
The Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies relevant to this case are policies 2.1.1
(Citizen Involvement); 10.1.1 (Service Delivery Capacity); and 10.1.2 (Boundary
Criteria). The pertinent Tigard Community Development Code sections are Chapters
18.136 (Annexations); and 18.138 (Established/Developing Area Classification).
9. The City of Tigard staff has indicated to the applicant that the City zoning which
most closely conforms to the current County zoning for this territory would be R-7
(minimum 5,000 sq.ft. lot size).
10. On July 14, 1986, Tigard adopted an Urban Services Policy declaring its willingness
to plan and ultimately provide urban services in an area around the current City
limits. The area proposed for annexation falls within the territory covered by this
policy. In addition, Tigard has conducted an Urban Services Studv covering the
study area. The study describes the area and discusses annexation, service
provision, expenditure requirements and revenue projections.
11. Sewer service will be available via an 8-inch City line in a street (as yet un-named)
which is under construction in the Hillshire Woods subdivision. This street is
approximately 40 feet to the east, and a 4-inch stub line is planned to connect the I
sewer to the territory to be annexed.
The territory is within the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) which has a standard
agreement between the Agency and the large cities within the Agency (Beaverton,
Cornelius, Forest Grove, Hillsboro, Tigard, Tualatin and Sherwood). In that agree-
ment the Cities agree to: 1) comply with the Agency's construction and mainte-
nance standards for sanitary and storm water sewer facilities, 2) follow and
accomplish the Agency's work program for storm and surface water, 3) obtain the
Agency's consent before issuing construction permits within wetlands, floodways
Findings - Page 2 of 5
~
.
Exhibit A
Proposal No. 3530
' and floodplains. The agreement provides that the city owns and is responsible for
sanitary sewer lines under 24 inches in diameter within the City limits and for storm
water facilities within the City limits as identified on a map (virtually all facilities).
The Unified Sewerage Agency is responsible for all industrial waste discharges, both
in and out of cities. The Unified Sewerage Agency agreed not to extend sanitary
sewer service to areas outside the City within the City's Urban Planning Area unless
the City approves.
The City must pass over to the Agency a portion of the sanitary sewer service
charges, storm sewer charges, sanitary sewer connection fees and storm sewer
connection fees collected by the City. The City may charge charges and fees higher
than those charged by the Agency and retain the additional revenues.
USA assesses a property tax which goes toward payment of bonds sold to con-
struct district-wide major improvements and regional treatment plants. For the
1994-95 tax year, this tax is $0.0681 per thousand assessed value. Recent new
facilities constructed to meet federal Clean Water Act standards were financed by
revenue bonds. These bonds are repaid from the District's monthly sewer user
charges.
12. The site can receive water service via an 8-inch water line in a street (as yet un-
named) which is under construction in the Hillshire Woods subdivision. This street
is approximately 40 feet to the east of the site.
The territory is within the boundary of the Tigard Water District. The City of Tigard,
which was previously served by the District, has withdrawn the territory within the
City from the District and established a Tigard Water Department. The City of
Tigard has an intergovernmental agreement with the Tigard Water District which
provides for services within the District by the City. Tigard also has an agreement
with Durham and King City, which have also withdrawn from the District, to provide
water services within those cities. Subsequent to annexation it is the intent of the
City to withdraw the territory from the District as provided for in ORS 222.
The term of the City/District agreement is until December 31, 2018. The agreement
establishes an intergovernmental water board (IWB) consisting of five members, one
from each of the city councils (Tigard, Durham, and King City) and from the Tigard
Water District Board plus one at-large member. The IWB makes recommendations
to the City Council on water service issues. The District agreed to transfer to the
City of Tigard assets that are necessary to the operation of the City's water system,
including water supply contracts, but to retain its other assets located within the
remaining District. All District employees were transferred to Tigard. The District
agreed that the Tigard Water Department would manage all the assets. If the
District or Durham or King City terminate their agreement with Tigard, the system
Findings - Page 3 of 5
.
Exhibit A
Proposal No. 3530
assets will be proportionately distributed. The agreement provides that the fees,
rates and charges for water service to the District, Durham and King City will be the
same as those charged within Tigard. However, the charges may be higher when
the cost of providing service is higher because of unusual circumstances, including
added costs to pump water up hill. The agreement covers the original boundary of
the District, at the time of the Agreement/withdrawals. It specifically provides that
Tigard has no obligation to serve water to areas annexed to the District after the
date of the agreement.
The City has water available to serve the other portions of this area from lines in
existing subdivisions to the east and south. Extensive storage exists in several
locations on Bull Mountain which provides adequate volume and pressure of water
to serve this area. Specifically, the 10 million gallon Terminal reservoir near Bull
Mountain Road and Hazeltree Street at elevation 470 feet, and the 1.1 million gallon ;
High Tor reservoir at elevation 713 feet will provide service to this area. II
Currently the City charges in the Bull Mountain area include a $1000 system !
development charge plus a $250 installation fee for a total installation charge of
$1,250 for a standard 5/8" or 3/4" meter. The monthly user charge is $6.50 for
the first 400 cubic feet of water and then $1.20 per 100 cubic feet of water. ~
13. Upon annexation to the City, the territory will be automatically withdrawn from the Washington County Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District and the District's $ .8367 per
, thousand property tax will no longer be levied against the territory. The County
Service District provides a level of service of .51 officers per 1000 population which
in addition to the general County level of .43 officers per 1000 population means
that the current level is .94 officer per 1000 population.
Subsequent to annexation, the Tigard Police Department will provide police protec-
tion to the territory. Tigard provides a service level of 1.3 officers per thousand
population. Emergency response in Tigard is under five minutes.
14. The territory is within the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District. Annexation will
not affect this service because the City is in the District.
15. The territory is within the boundary of the Washington County Urban Road Mainte-
nance District. Upon annexation the territory will be automatically withdrawn from
the District, and the District's levy of $.3229 per $1000 assessed value will no
longer apply to the property.
Upon annexation and withdrawal from the District, the County's policy is to retain
jurisdiction over arterials and major collectors. The County does not desire jurisdic-
tion over local roads. SW Fern Street is designated as a"local street" on the
Findings - Page 4 of 5
.
~ • , ~ •
Exhibit A
Proposal No. 3530
County's Transportation Plan Map, and defined as intended to provide direct
property access. A local street is not intended to serve through traffic." The City
finances road maintenance from gas taxes.
16. The territory is within the boundary of the Washington County Vector Control
District. Tigard is not a part of the District. Upon annexation, the territory will be
automatically withdrawn from the unfunded Washington County Vector Control
District.
17. The territory is within the Washington County Service District #1 for street lights.
The District provides services to areas within its boundary which request street
lighting services. The District uses local improvement districts to finance the
service. The District does not provide street lights in the subject territory. Upon
annexation it will be automatically withdrawn from the District.
The City provides street lighting service out of its Street fund which receives State
shared gasoline tax revenues as its primary revenue source. Street lights are
required by the City in residential subdivisions. Upon installation of street lights by
a developer to City standards, the City accepts dedication of the street lights and
takes on ongoing operation and maintenance costs.
18. Tigard operates a park system funded through its tax base which finances the
general fund. Tigard has 6 developed recreation park sites.
19. The site can receive water service via an 12-inch storm line in a street (as yet un-
named) which is under construction in the Hillshire Woods subdivision. This street
is approximately 40 feet to the east of the site. The Unified Sewerage Agency
levies an annual assessment for storm drainage services of $36 per dwelling unit of
' which $24 goes to the City.
REASONS FOR DECISION
Based on the Findings the Commission determined:
1. The proposal is consistent with City, County, and Regional planning for the area.
2. The City can provide an adequate quantity and quality of public services to the area.
I
3. The proposal is consistent with the Boundary Commission Policy On Incorporated
Status (OAR 193-05-005) and the Policy On Long Term/Long Range Governmental
Structure (OAR 193-05-015).
Findings - Page 5 of 5
GQACKAMAS • •
MULTNOMAH
WASHINGTON
'1' A 1 '1'I A A 1 A GOVERMENT' :1 1A' 1 1
800 NE OREGON STREET It 16 (SUITE 540) PORTLAND, OREGON 97232 PHONE: 731-4093
September 20, 1995
Ray Valone
City of Tigard
13125 SW Hail
Tigard OR 97223
Ref.• 3530
Dear Ray:
The Boundary Commission Statute, ORS 199.410 to 199.534 authorizes posting
of Public Hearing Notices within the area(s) to be annexed .
In order to meet the requirements of ORS 199.463, they need to be posted by
October 5, 1995
Therefore, we would appreciate your cooperation in posting 3 copies of the
enclosed NOTICE OF HEARING and map. They should be posted in conspicuous
places within and/or immediately adjacent to the involved area(s) and they
should be placed in a manner reasonably calculated to be observed by the public.
(The additional copy of the hearing notice is for your records.)
Also would you please send us an "AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING."
Thank you.
Kenneth S. Martin
Executive Officer
KSM/Imr
Enclosures
STAFF COMMISSIONERS
KENNETH S. MARTIN, Executive Officer RAY BARTEI. Chair MARILYNN HEIZEFIMAN
DENIECE WON, Executive Assistant TOM WHITTAKER, Vice-Chair SY KORNBRODT
KELLY PAIGE. Executive Assistant BOB BOUNEFF SUE L,4M8
LANA RULIEN, Adminiscrative Assistant NATHALIE DARCY
PROPOSAL ■ 3530
SW1/4 NW1/4 SECTION 4 T2S R 1 W W.M. 2S 1 4BC
Washington County
Scale: 1 200' .
.
" „aa~ „a~ „od-_ ~ro iroor ~mor noa' 200 100
/ m .1o1o: • no.o~ ~ a .r» . 500 300
1000 9 ~ [45 aC .49 A: fsr Ic 1.08 K
' /90 JG I,1C. 2/!JC 161 a4
o/
lo JSaG s
TIGARD 400
9
S g ~
p ~ ~ 12 °.r 7 ~
~ 15 1 aY
tu msa t ~
F"
(n . .ea
C I ~.L
L p { r
Q ~nq h•
a 1 2100
~ . s ,r. ex Ac a,
I I S
I '4 R
x.oo
.K AC. ~ ° 4..
' f,? ~ EI ~ .
' • j ~
y ewor I IM ~ I ~u~: '
1600 R
~
I S.W y.,ec A I 2400 ~
- # 1500 5I Tti '
• p:. imo; V .
~ ~?9 i300 1400 .s~.c. ~ ~800
w L04 nc. r.ao.r ,m.c. - i•~- J ~
zcoo
r.js nc
1700
I 109 K .A s 2200 'Q -
.~f ~u
2~ ~ 2.4i sGL ~ G
I 23
20
izoo -~T1{ 19 24
~R i4s.a, V :I 2000
a Q• Y 17 18 y,' +I ~1 c f 1 r :J
I
lJ.l
J I
~ iioo
W :~JSa Ac
Z I
z AREA TO BE
m
ANNEXED
°
` .o,., : : : : : ~ . . . : : : ' . .
~ ~V~~CP~I• : ~ . . i
PROPOSAL N0, 3530
CITY OF TIGARD
ANNEXATION ~
FIGURE 2 ~
V U1lil \,,\IV V1J
MUI,TNQMAH •
1NASHINGTON ~
,
A► A LOCAL GOV
ERNMENt tl 1A' 1 1
800 NE OREGON STREET q 16 (SUITE 540) POIiTIAND, OREGON 97232 PHONE: 731=4093
PUBLI(;
IY13TICE
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT AT 7:00 PM ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 19, 1995, IN
ROOM 602 MULTNOMAH COUNTY COURTHOUSE, 1021 SW 4TH AVE., PORTLAND,
OREGON, THERE SHALL BE A PUBL(C HEAR(NG BY AND BEFORE THE PORTLAND
METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION ON
PROPOSALS, INCLUDING THE ONE LISTED BELOW. INTERESTED PERSONS MAY
APPEAR AND WILL BE GIVEN REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD.
PROPOSAL NO. 3530 - ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD of territory located ~
~ generally on W edge of City, on S edge of SW Fern St., E of the BPA easement; more
particularly, TL 1 9 00, SW 1/4 NW 1/4 Sec. 4, T2S R 1 W W.M., Wash. Co., OR. I
GENERAL INFORMATION, MAPS AND AN AGENDA MAY BE OBTAINED BY CALLING
731-4093.
SEPTEMBER 22, 1995 RAY BARTEL, CHAIRMAN STAFF COMMISSIONERS
KENNETH S. MARTIN, Execulive OI(icer RAY BARTEL, Chair MARIIYNN HELZERMAN
DENIECE WbN, Executive Asststant TOM WHITTAKER, Vice-Chair SY KORNBRODT
KELLY PAIGE, Executive Assistant DOB BOUNEFF SUE LAMB
LANA RULIEN, Adm(nlslratlve Assistant NATHAIIE DARCV
• CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ~
ORDINANCE N0. 95-
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE (ZCA 95-0003).
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on September 12,
1995, to consider initiating annexation and to consider comprehensive
plan and zone designations for one parcel of land located at the western
end of SW Fern Street adjacent to the Bonneville Power Easement; and
WHEREAS, on September 12, 1995, the Tigard City Council approved a
resolution forwarding the proposed annexation to the Portland
Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission; and
WHEREAS, the zoning district designation recommended by the planning
staff as set forth in the attached staff report and in Section 1 below
is that which most closely approximates the Washington County land use
designation while implementing the city's existing Comprehensive Plan
designation of Medium Density Residential,
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION l: Upon annexation, the affected property shall be
designated as follows:•
Tax Map, Lot Number Current Land Use New Land Use
2S1 4BC, lot 1100 Wash. Co. R-6 Medium Density Residential
Current Zonincr New Zonincr
Wash. Co. R-6 Tigard R-7
SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its
passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and
posting by the City Recorder.
PASSED: By UnCLi/liVVlOc.L.S vote of all Council members present
after being read by number and title only, this day
o f -~p ~-zm- 19 9
ather'ne Wheatley, Cit corder
APPROVED : By Tigard City Council t y o
1995.
Ja Nicol', Mayo
Approved as to form:
- ; G(
Cit to'ney
Date ORDINANCE No. 95-
Page 1
• CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON •
ORDINANCE N0. 95-
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE (ZCA 95-0003).
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on September 12,
1995, to consider initiating annexation and to consider comprehensive
plan and zone designations for one parcel of land located at the western
end of SW Fern Street adjacent to the Bonneville Power Easement; and
WHEREAS, on September 12, 1995, the Tigard City Council approved a
resolution forwarding the proposed annexation to the Portland
Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission; and
WHEREAS, the zoning district designation recommended by the planning
staff as set forth in the attached staff report and in Section 1 below
i is that which most closely approximates the Washington County land use
designation while implementing the city's existing Comprehensive Plan
designation of Medium Density Residential,
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Upon annexation, the affected property shall be
designated as follows:-
Tax Map, Lot Number Current Land Use New Land Use
2S1 4BC, lot 1100 Wash. Co. R-6 Medium Density Residential
Current ZoninQ New Zonincr
Wash. Co. R-6 Tigard R-7
SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its
passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and
posting by the City Recorder.
PASSED : By Un C(,✓li V►Ivc,t..S vote of all Council members present
after being read by number and title only, this /jt r-`` day
o f
Cather'ne Wheatley, Cit "corder
APPROVED. By Tigard City Council t i /Z~~ y o~
1995. /
~
Ja~ Nicol', Mayor/
Approved~as to form: i
I /
, t
Cit to neyi~
- -~sr
Date ORDINANCE No. 95-
, Page 1
~ CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON •
.
RESOLUTION N0. 95-
A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE
TERRITORY AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A AND ILLUSTR.ATED IN EXHIBIT B
(ZCA 95-0003). ~ WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a hearing on September 12, 1995,
to consider the annexation of one parcel of land consisting of 1.88
acres located at the western end of SW Fern Street adjacent to the
Bonneville Power Easement; and
i WHEREAS, the proposed annexation constitutes a minor boundary change
under Boundary Commission law ORS 199.410 to 199.519; and
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B)
to initiate an annexation upon receiving consent in writing from a
ma'orit of th
~ y e electors registered in the territory proposed to be
annexed and written consent from owners of more than half the land in
the territory proposed to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, the ro ert which lies within the boundar of the Washin
P P Y y gton
County Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District, Washington County Urban Roads
Maintenance District, Washington County Street Lighting District #1 and
the Washington County Vector Control District would, by operation of ORS
199.510, be automatically withdrawn from those districts immediately
upon completion of the annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
Section l: The City Council, pursuant to ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B),
hereby initiates proceedings for annexation to the City
of Tigard of the territory described in Exhibit A and
illustrated in Exhibit B.
Section 2: The City Council hereby approves the proposed annexation
and requests that the Portland Metropolitan Area Local
Government Boundary Commission approve the proposal and
effect it as soon as possible.
Section 3: The City Recorder is hereby directed to file certified
copies of the resolution with the Portland Metropolitan
Area Local Government undary Commission at once.
PASSED: This day 1995.
Ma - City of Tigard
ATT T:
Gertified to be a T'rue Copy of
City R corder - City of T' ard
Original on file :4T 7zamD cz-Zt./
Date
Nqu
RESOLUTION NO. 95 j ! ~y Page 1 City Re order - City of Tig d
Date: 131? s
.
~
• ~ EXHIBIT A
STAFF REPORT
September 12, 1995
' TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
TIGARD TOWN HALL '
13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD
TIGARD, OREGON 97223
A. FACTS
1. General Information
CASE: Zone Change Annexation 95-0003
' REQUEST: To annex one parcel of 1.88 acres of
unincorporated Washington County land to the
' City of Tigard and to change the comprehensive
plan and zone from Washington County R-6 to
City of Tigard Medium Density Residential,
' R-7.
APPLICANT: Harry and Judith Jeffery
14520 SW Fern Street
Tigard, OR 97223
OWNERS: Same
LOCATION: The western end of SW Fern Street adjacent to
the Bonneville Power Administration easement -
WCTM 2S1 4BC, lot 1100 (see vicinity map).
2. Vicinitv Information
Properties to the north are in Washington County and zoned
R-6. Properties to the east and south are in the city and
zoned R-7. The Bonneville Power Administration easement is
directly to the west with unincorporated county territory
beyond the easement. The parcels to the north have single
family residences. Properties to the east and south are
currently vacant but will be part of the Hillshire Woods
subdivision.
3. Background Information
The applicants approached the city with a request to annex the
property. No previous applications have been reviewed by the
city relating to this property.
4. Site Information and Proposal Description I
The parcel is a flag lot with the existing residence located
close to the eastern lot line. Driveway access is shared with
1
~
the flag lot to the north (2S1 4BC, lot 1200). The site
slopes from east to west/northwest, varying from about a 10%
to 25% grade. There is a wooded area running in a north/south
direction through the middle of the property.
The applicants have requested that the 1.88-acre site be
annexed to the city by means of the double majority method.
Representing the owners of more than half the land (100%) and
a majority of the registered electors (100°s) of the area
proposed to be annexed, the applicants have initiated this
action through their written consent. The applicants intend
to partition the parcel after annexation to the city.
5. Actency Comments
The Engineering Division, Tigard Police and Water departments,
Unified Sewerage Agency, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue
District, PGE and GTE have reviewed the proposal and have no
objections. No other comments were received at the time of
this report.
B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive
Plan policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2, and 10.1.3; and Tigard
Community Development Code chapters 18.136 and 18.138.
Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the
relevant portions of the comprehensive plan based on the
following findings:
1. Policy 2.1.1, requiring an ongoing citizen involvement
program, is satisfied because the West CIT and
surrounding property owners have been notified of the
hearing and public notice of the hearing has been
, published.
2. Policy 10.1.1, requiring adequate service capacity
delivery to annexed parcels, is satisfied because the
Police Department, Engineering, Water Department, USA and
TVF&R have reviewed the proposal and indicate that
adequate services are available and may be extended to
accommodate the affected property.
3. Policy 10.1.2, boundary criteria for annexations, is
satisfied because the proposal will not create a boundary
irregularity in this area; the Police Department has been
notified of this request and has no objection; the
affected land is located within the city's urban planning
area and is contiguous to the city boundary; and adequate
services are available to accommodate the property.
2 'I
~
Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the
relevant portions of the community development code based on
the following findings:
1. Code Section 18.136.030, requiring approval standards for
annexation proposals, is satisfied because:
a. Service providers have indicated that adequate
facilities and services are available and have
sufficient capacity to serve the affected site.
b. Applicable comprehensive plan policies and code
provisions have been reviewed and satisfied.
i c. The zonin desi nation of R-7 most closel c n
3 J y o forms
to the county designation of R-6 while implementing
the city's comprehensive plan designation of Medium
Density Residential.
I d. The determination that the affected ProPer
tY is an
established area is based on the standards in
Chapter 18.138 of the code.
2. Code Section 18.138, providing standards for the
classification of annexed land, is satisfied because the
affected property meets the definition of an established
area and shall be so designated on the development
standard areas map of the comprehensive plan.
C. RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings noted above, the planning staff
recommends approval of ZCA 95-0003.
3
~
Z
a
~
a
~
N
2
~
O
Q
oG
~ W
4 Q
a
J
W
Z
O
m
L
- e
n
9 ~
. d ZoRe Gha
pnneXation a R~ to CitY R e~om Feet
~ ~rom GountY plan chan9 ~
ComPrehenaive Medium Densi1y
ofi Tigacd COUnty ~o c'nv
R
ity 6
C`,
1 plannin9 oe ~aad Annexation t~mits
han9 Area CiCY
Zone C ~
ZCp,g5 Da03
08lG4~5 M:Wt5DArTIGCO,,#,NNFJa
. . . • •
AGENDA ITEM #
For Agenda of September 12, 1995
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
, COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUNIlMARY
ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE Zone Chancre Annexation ZCA 95-0003 (~-rre!~)
PREPARED BY: Ray Valone DEPT HEAD OK CITY ADMIN OK
ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL
Should the City Council forward to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local
Government Boundary Commission a request to initiate annexation of one parcel
consisting of 1.88 acres located at the western end of SW Fern Street
adjacent to the Bonneville Power Easement?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the attached resolution and ordinance to forward the annexation request
to the Boundary Commission and to assign comprehensive plan and zone
designations to the property in conformance with the city comprehensive plan.
INFORMATION SUMMARY
The proposed annexation consists of territory comprised of one parcel of
land, totaling 1.88 acres, which is contiguous to the City of Tigard. The
applicants request annexation in order to partition the property and receive
sanitary sewer service. Attached is a resolution initiating annexation and
an ordinance to change the comprehensive plan and zone designations from
Washington County R-6 to Tigard Medium Density Residential, R-7.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Deny the request.
FISCAL NOTES
Since the territory is not within the city's active planning area, the
applicant is responsible for the Boundary Commission application fee of $395.
• CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON •
ORDINANCE N0. 95-
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE
AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE (ZCA 95-0003).
' WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on September 12,
1995, to consider initiating annexation and to consider comprehensive
plan and zone designations for one parcel of land located at the western
end of SW Fern Street adjacent to the Bonneville Power Easement; and
WHEREAS, on September 12, 1995, the Tigard City Council approved a
resolution forwarding the proposed annexation to the Portland
Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission; and
WHEREAS, the zoning district designation recommended by the planning
staff as set forth in the attached staff report and in Section 1 below
is that which most closely approximates the Washington County land use
designation while implementing the city's existing Comprehensive Plan
designation of Medium Density Residential,
THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Upon annexation, the affected property shall be
designated as follows:-
Tax Map, Lot Number Current Land Use New Land Use
2S1 43C, lot 1100 Wash. Co. R-6 Medium Density Residential
Current Zoninct New Zonincr
Wash. Co. R-6 Tigard R-7
SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its
passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor, and
posting by the City Recorder.
PASSED: By vote of all Council members present
after being read by number and title only, this day
of , 1995.
Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder
APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of ,
1995.
James Nicoli, Mayor
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
Date
ORDINANCE No. 95-
Page 1
• CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON • '
RESOLUTION N0. 95-
A RESOLUTION ZNITIATING ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TIGARD OF THE
TERRITORY AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A AND ILLUSTRATED IN EXHIBIT B ~
(ZCA 95-0003).
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a hearing on September 12, 1995,
to consider the annexation of one parcel of land consisting of 1.88
acres located at the western end of SW Fern Street adjacent to the
Bonneville Power Easement; and
WHEREAS, the proposed annexation constitutes a minor boundary change
under Boundary Commission law ORS 199.410 to 199.519; and
WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B)
to initiate an annexation upon receiving consent in writing from a
majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be
annexed and written consent from owners of more than half the land in
the territory proposed to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, the property which lies within the boundary of the Washington
County Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District, Washington County Urban Roads
Maintenance District, Washington County Street Lighting District #1 and
the Washington County Vector Control District would, by operation of ORS
199.510, be automatically withdrawn from those districts immediately
upon completion of the annexation,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
Section l: The City Council, pursuant to ORS 199.490(2)(a)(13),
hereby initiates proceedings for annexation to the City
of Tigard of the territory described in Exhibit A and
illustrated in Exhibit B.
Section 2: The City Council hereby approves the proposed annexation
and requests that the Portland Metropolitan Area Local
Government Boundary Commission approve the proposal and
effect it as soon as possible.
Section 3: The City Recorder is hereby directed to file certified
copies of the resolution with the Portland Metropolitan
Area Local Government Boundary Commission at once.
PASSED: This day of , 1995.
Mayor - City of Tigard
ATTEST:
City Recorder - City of Tigard
Date
RESOLUTION N0. 95-
Page 1
. . . • • •
, EXHIBIT A
STAFF REPORT
September 12, 1995
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
TIGARD TOWN HALL
13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD
TIGARD, OREGON 97223
A. FACTS
1. General Information
CASE: Zone Change Annexation 95-0003
REQUEST: To annex one parcel of 1.88 acres of
unincorporated Washington County land to the
City of Tigard and to change the comprehensive
plan and zone from Washington County R-6 to
City of Tigard Medium Density Residential,
R-7.
APPLICANT: Harry and Judith Jeffery •
14520 SW Fern Street
Tigard, OR 97223
OWNERS: Same
, LOCATION: The western end of SW Fern Street adjacent to
the Bonneville Power Administration easement -
WCTM 2S1 4BC, lot 1100 (see vicinity map).
2. Vicinity Information
Properties to the north are in Washington County and zoned
R-6. Properties to the east and south are in the city and
zoned R-7. The Bonneville Power Administration easement is
directly to the west with unincorporated county territory
beyond the easement. The parcels to the north have single
family residences. Properties to the east and south are
currently vacant but will be part of the Hillshire Woods
subdivision.
3. Background Information
The applicants approached the city with a request to annex the
property. No previous applications have been reviewed by the
city relating to this property.
4. Site Information and Proposal Description
The parcel is a flag lot with the existing residence located
close to the eastern lot line. Driveway access is shared with
1
• •
the flag lot to the north (2S1 4BC, lot 1200). The site
slopes from east to west/northwest, varying from about a 10%
to 25°s grade. There is a wooded area running in a north/south
direction through the middle of the property.
The applicants have requested that the 1.88-acre site be
annexed to the city by means of the double majority method.
Representing the owners of more than half the land (100°s) and
a majority of the registered electors (100%) of the area
proposed to be annexed, the applicants have initiated this
action through their written consent. The applicants intend
to partition the parcel after annexation to the city.
5. Acrency Comments
The Engineering Division, Tigard Police and Water departments,
Unified Sewerage Agency, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue
District, PGE and GTE have reviewed the proposal and have no
objections. No other comments were received at the time of
this report.
B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive
' Plan policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2, and 10.1.3; and Tigard
Community Development Code chapters 18.136 and 18.138.
Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the
relevant portions of the comprehensive plan based on the
following findings:
l. Policy 2.1.1, requiring an ongoing citizen involvement
program, is satisfied because the West CIT and
surrounding property owners have been notified of the
hearing and public notice of the hearing has been
published.
2. Policy 10.1.1, requiring adequate service capacity
delivery to annexed parcels, is satisfied because the
Police Department, Engineering, Water Department, USA and
TVF&R have reviewed the proposal and indicate that
adequate services are available and may be extended to
accommodate the affected property.
3. Policy 10.1.2, boundary criteria for annexations, is
satisfied because the proposal will not create a boundary
irregularity in this area; the Police Department has been
notified of this request and has no objection; the
affected land is located within the city's urban planning
area and is contiguous to the city boundary; and adequate
services are available to accommodate the property.
2
~
, . .
• •
.
Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the
relevant portions of the community development code based on
the following findings:
1. Code Section 18.136.030, requiring approval standards for
. annexation proposals, is satisfied because:
a. Service providers have indicated that adequate
facilities and services are available and have
sufficient capacity to serve the affected site.
b. Applicable comprehensive plan policies and code
provisions have been reviewed and satisfied.
c. The zoning designation of R-7 most closely conforms
to the county designation of-R-6 while implementing
the city's comprehensive plan designation of Medium
I DensitY Residential.
d. The determination that the affected property is an
established area is based on the standards in
Chapter 18.138 of the code.
2. Code Section 18.138, providing standards for the
classification of annexed land, is satisfied because the
affected property meets the definition of an established
area and shall be so designated on the development
standard areas map of the comprehensive plan.
C. RECOMIIrlENDATION
Based on the findings noted above, the planning staff
recommends approval of ZCA 95-0003.
3
ilt
.1• '
z
0
r
4
oC
N
N
Z
~
a
Q
a
~o w
O
It"
J
w
z
0
~
[
• -
an9e
~
e
GitY Ch R7
p,,r,nexatian an ~to
~rrom GauntY R lan chan9e hom ~ 124 F eet
ComPrehe~'Slv Gc~ty Medium DensitY ,12~
G~tY of pePartc'nent exation count~ R-6 to
P1a~~'Ghan9e and A~~ Area witt~in Cifi! lirtits
Zor\e 3
~ ZCAgS-000
OBN~S M:V3t5DAT1'GCo
• •
11MME \ \ITY O
. 4
F TIGARD
~
~
*\~•.a
:
.tt:•:\.::•~+:~",»•.~::ti:?:;
• w ~•.•..:'.:•.::w:: ;.~x•ti::t•.\d.,•,::.:•.::•:~;~~w
~ ~ ~ti...}...t.,
' \ 33,
.
~\~~+.:~y:~~ v•,.~.'s: \ •.~..+.i, •
, Y 1\';+•\~~:::.,.~,
.
• ti c ~~~\\w~r
. ' 0~ ~ ,~~.~.~:,ti
\w~ ~ \~`x CCk~.+,`'..,.'+.~,.+~,.ti\~ti:•:'\~ti•tiC~~\\
~ \ ~ ti \;:`+~}x k\.+~\. ~ 4 ; \ . j. > ti ~ ♦
\ ♦ ` \ ' ti,..,•.>•, w ~ ~
kti tiC\ w~v~~Qt~\ a♦ .c~:;•~:~':•>i~k~ i• ti~. • ti•±: ti~: ~.w~~~~
4 ~ ; \ ~
~ %`~<'•t' ~ ~ti \ ~'\4+;:: \ •::.~\iY; ti~ \.w~.ti~ :$~~t~^'
\ ~~'~~~\\C\titi~\ti ~\',C~ti~ ~•~'\`~'•.`.:;"~ti.'~k~`~
PllBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the
appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor
at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes
or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or
, the City Administrator.
Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be
present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can
be heard in am► order after 7:30 o.m.
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be
scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting.
Please ca11639-4171, Ext. 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices
for the Deaf).
llpon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
• Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;
and
• Qualified bilingval interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to
allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on
the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above: 639-
4171, x309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEEi7NG ,
SFEPTEMBER 12, 1995 - 6:30 Pie AG EN DA .
6:30 p.m.
• STUDY MEETING
> Executnre Session: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session
under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), st (h) to discuss labor
relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. As
you are aware, all discussions within this session are confidential; therefore
nothing from this meeting may be disclosed by those present. Representatnres
of the news media are allowed to attend this session, but must not disclose
any information discussed during this session.
> Agenda Review
7:30 p.m.
~ . BusnrESS MEETINc
1.1 Call to Order - City Council 8t Local Contract Review Board
1.2 Roll Call
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
1.4 Council Communications/Liaison Reports
13 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items
2. PROCLAMATIONS:
2.1 Disability Employment Awareness Month
2.2 Crime Prevention Month
3. VISITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please)
4. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted
in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be
removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to:
4.1 Approve City Council Minutes: August 8 and 15, 1995
4.2 Receive and File:
a. Council Calendar
b. Tentative Agendas
4.3 Approve Library Board and Planning Commission Appointments - Resolution
No. 95-
4.4 Local Contract Review Board:
a. Award of Contract for Construction of the Ash/Scoffins Street Storm
Drainage CIP
• Conseet Azenda - Items Removed for Seoarate Discussion: Ami items requested to
be removed from the Consent Menda for senarate discassioe vin'll be considered
immediately after the Coanai has voted on those itenns which do not need
discassion.
COUNCIL AGENDA - SEPTEMBER 12, 1995 - PAGE 2
• •
5. DISCIISS FEE WAIVERS
6. DISC!! / TO FORWARD TO METRO
• Community Development Director
7. IIPDATE FROM TASK FORCE ON THE COOK PARK PROPERTY PLIRCHASE
• Mayor Nicoli
8. DISC[ISS GREENSPACES
• Mayor Nicoli
9. PtIBt,1C HEARING (QWASI-][lDICIAi.): ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION - ZCA
95-0003 - JEFFERY A request to annex one parcel of 1.88 acres into the City and change the
~ Comprehensive Plan and Zone from Washington County R-6 to City of Tigard
Medium Density Residential, R-7. LOCATION: The western end of SW Fern Street
adjacent to the Bonneville PowerAdministration easement. APPLICABLE REVIEW
CRITERIA: The relevant review criteria are Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1,
Citizen Involvement; 10.1.1, Service Delnrery Capacity; 10.1.2, Boundary Criteria;
and 10.1.3 Zoning Designation. Community Development Code Chapters 18.136,
Annexation Requirements, and 18.138, Land Classification of Annexed Territory.
ZONE: Presently Washington County R-6.
a. Open Public Hearing
b. Declarations or Challenges
c. Staff Report: Community Development Department
d. Public Testimony
- Applicant
- Proponenu
- Opponents
- Rebuttal
e. Staff Recommendation
f. Council Questions
g. Ctose Public Hearing
h. Council Consideration: Resolution No. 95-
Ordinance No. 95
COUNCIL AGENDA - SEPTEMBER, 12, 1995 - PAGE 3
~
• •
10. PIIBLIC HFARING (QtIASI ]tIDIC1AL): APPEAI. OF A REQ[IEST FOR A
SIIBDMSION (S[IB) 95-0002/LOT LINE ADJIISTMENT (M15) 95-0012 AND
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95-0006 APPROVAL - FORAN
PLACE/PICIILELL GROl1P
A request for approval of the following development applications:
1. Subdivision preliminary plat approval to divide an approximately 3.9 acre
parcel into 12 lots ranging between 6,091 square feet to 8,737 square feet.
2. Lot Line adjustment request to adjust two parcels of approximately 4.5 3 and
2.26 acres into two parcels of approximately 3.9 and 2.89 acres.
3. Sensitive Lands Review approval of preliminary plans for grading, road
construction and devetopment of portions of the subject property that exceed
25 percent grade.
LOCATION: West of Woodford Estates, and approximately 650 feet north of S.W.
Bull Mountain Road. (WCTM 2S 1, 9AB, Tax Lots 1200 and 5700). APPLICABLE
REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.52, 18.84, 18.88,
18.92, 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150, 18.160 and 18.164.
Comprehensive Plan Policies: 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.2.1, 7.3.1, 7.4.4,
7.6.1, 8.1.1 and 8.1.3. ZONE: R-7 (Residential, 7 units per acre). The R-7 zone
allows single family residential units, duplex residential units, public support
facilities, residential treatment home, farming, manufactured home, family day care,
~ home occupation, temporary use, and accessory structures.
a. Open Public Hearing
b. Declarations or Challenges
c. Staff Report: Community Development Department
d. Public Testimony
- Applicant
- Proponents
- Opponents
- Rebuttal
e. Staff Recommendation
f. Council Questions
g. Close Public Hearing
h. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 95-
COUNCIL AGENDA - SEPTEMBER, 12, 1995 - PAGE 4
1
• •
11. PIIBLIC HFARING (LEGISLATIVE): ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA)
92-0004 TREE REMOVAI.
LOCATION: Citywide. A request by the City of Tigard to replace Chapter 18.150
of the City of Trgard Community Development Code with new code provisions
pertaining to tree removal and to provide amended provisions for a stop work order
hearing in Section 18.24.070. The proposed amendments to section 18.150 call
for the following:
1. Tree removal permiu onty on sensitive lands as defined by Chapter 18.84; ~
2. A tree plan prepared by a certified arborist to be provided with any
development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development
review, planned development or conditional use; ~
3. Mitigation requirements for tree removal in developments;
4. The prohibition of commercial forestry (removal of ten (10) trees or more,
per acre, per calendar year for sale);
5. Permit exemption for land used for Christmas tree production or if registered
as property tax deferred tree farms or small woodlands;
6. Permit criteria including erosion control standards and seventy-fnre (75)
percent canopy cover within fifty (50) feet of stream or wetland;
7. Provisions for incentives and setback adjustments to allow for tree retention;
S. Penalties for the illegal removal of trees;
9. Replacement tree provisions.
~ APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, and 5;
Comprehensive Plan Policies 1(General Policies), 2(Citizen Involvement), 3.4.b
(Natural Areas), and Implementation Strategy of Policy 3.4; and Community
Development Code Chapter 18.30.120.
a. Open Public Hearing
b. Staff Report: Community Development Department
c. Public Testimony
- Proponents
- Opponents
d. Staff Recommendation
e. Council Questions
f. Close Public Hearing
g. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 95-_
Resolution No. 95-
12. REVIEW DEPARTMENTAL SERVICE STANDARDS
• City Administrator
13. COIINCIL CONSIDERATION: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO COIINCIL
COMPENSA770N
• Staff Recap of History to Date: City Administrator
COUNCIL AGENDA • SEPTEMBER 12, 1995 - PAGE 5
•
14. CO[INCIL CONSIDERATION: CO!lNCIL GROtINDRtlLES
• City Administrator
15. NON AGENDA ITEMS
16. EXECIITIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under
the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), 8t (h) to discuss labor relations, real
property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. As you are aware, all
discussions within this session are conftdential; therefore nothing from this meeting
may be disclosed by those present. Representatives of the news media are allowed
to attend this session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this
session.
15. AD]OIIRNMEM
cw0912.95
COUNCIL AGENDA - SEPTEMBEB 12, 1995 - PAGE 6
~ ' .
~ CITY OF TIGARD
~
;
! OREGON
;
~
September 15, 1995
;
Kelly Paige, Management Analyst
Portland Metropolitan Area
~ Local Government Boundary Commission
Suite 540
-I 800 NE Oregon Street #16
~ Portland, OR 97232
~ Dear Kelly:
i I am writing to submit the enclosed forms for a city-initiated, double
j majority annexation request (Tigard ZCA 95-0003) and to request space
on the Boundary Commission's agenda of October 19, 1995. If you
have any questions or need additional information, please call me at
~ 639-4171.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
j Sincerely, _
i
Ray Valone, AICP
i Associate Planner
' . Enclosures
~ -
'
13125 S1N Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772
HAR E. JEFFERY ~°--.~n» 3055 ' JUDITH A. JEFFERY ~
14520 SW FERN ST.
TIGARD, OR 9»3 7- a~
a ~
,
fl1 o aer'of Bt~v,c.~g coo►.~,u cssr a.c/ I$ 3~'S_..~-.! ~
j.~ 4
1 i- Nb Ag' .gl~ry Vff-' o0 4
U.B. BANK ] 800 US BANKS - . . ' ~
~ • - ' i ♦L. r (
UNITED STA7'FSgNA'i'[ONAL BANK OF OREGON
~ TL /loo ~~x a r~ow/ ~ ~
. ~
1000,
N • • •
PMALGBC FORItil #6
BDUNDARY CHANGE DATA SHEET
1. EXISTING CONDITIONS IN AREA TO B.&' AlYNEXED OR WITHDRAWN
A. Land Area: Acres or Squaze Miles
B. General description of territory. (Include topographic features such as slopes,
vegetarion, drainage basiris, floodplain areas, which aze pertinent to this proposal).
_ I K t 5.~ S LJ ~'~S ,'J~;.i.+uwA2~j ~✓L~ A 7L
)
~/,a lr•-( ~ ~ G T,~.c .~t .4} 1'f'rpx; ,.~witil-j ` 3 v7 . i1h 2c ; S ~ L..: ~ .7
' 7n ~1J 1 . (,(N A.' ~ ~ ~ c"~ ' ►i ~ ~ l4 -C
C. Describe land uses on surrounding parcels. Use tax lots as reference points.
NOtih: rnMe:A a~t~.~l l~+ ~ c•~'bl AA,c 'iwi. S~ v o c..~ -Fo-~c ~-1 A-c.3c a v~t:_ S~a'~'S I 2 ~ G£ 13 Da
g`
ZS~ d8G(~- ,1
L1 t2~ss .~i e.; S'2~-E'~ A~.c='. _~hc~,,,,; F~~ PtR'SL'S OJ(:" l'I!' B~' n-ait-7 ur ]L('~.r
~25 1 456C
EBSt: ,L+G' PR-°c2+t 1-b '1A41:' Liic~- fs-~4ov l"'t/Li^-~ Ll
WOVbS ~
5c P-.,a O.r ;w I-kanh l1t: _'Qc=~r S,AA--.avis 1U.J ,
• $ OUt~l: p!► !LC C.: L 42s I4 L.> i SG~ ~ 5 C:.~/~/L~•a.: L°~ 1/~~1vl ~i iy u T i,..i, l L
r
,3 Or 71.1.~ S k• 2c- wUob5 Sv •9,9.
West: .5~A•~~ts
A i=.r~ 7r- d PAR a~-+
D. Existing Land Use:
Number of single-family units 1 Number of mulri-family units O
Number commercial structures G Number industrial structures O
Public facilities or other uses G
What is the current use the land proposed to be annexed: r.A
IC ~ i.7 ~ ti1 1/n`
E. ?otai cunent year Assessed Valuation $ ZZ-7 ~ 1 IC)
F. Total exisring population 2
--11--
Revised 11/93
. • • •
II. REASON FOR BO UNDARY CHANGE
A. ORS 199.462 of the Boundary Commission Act states: "In order to carry out the
purposes described in ORS 199.410 when reviewing a boundary change..., a boundary
. commission shall_ consider local comprehensive planning for the area, economic,
demographic, sociological_projecrions pertinent to the proposal, past and prospective
physical developments of land that would directly or indirectly be affected by the
proposed boundary change..." Considering these points, please provide the reasons the
proposed boundary change should be made. Please be very specific. Use addirional
. pages if necessary. (This information is often quoted in the Staff Report, so be
thorough and complete.)
! / IG lJ~"~l'.L S ~ ~ ~~.~~~ti S~ 1i 6 .Q nJ `.~~Zl ~i.i fZ ,21 1 il G •v i~% f ~ `cL i~ .
I u%.i ~..4 e 6~. i. (..J . L L Q,-A, •2 Z- S r-LA-,c -C f C.J.,'zZ: 1 S L7,A-vc 7D
5dc,c.~e-A2- -f' G4~.a-✓G`. S~co.t L~ bt~ 7b <A ~,L~....:
A l-
/'.C.t~1/L ~ : v ~i %1~: ~ l~1'v✓. v ,qn.~ U t-'j~1-J Sc2.l.i.cS ,~ls.va/il ov ,
B. If the property to be served is enrirely or substantially undeveloped, what are the plans
for future development? Be specific. Describe type (residential, industrial, commercial,
etc.), density, etc.
i~, -J 6 D,20 P~ ~ r-~ 6ks o---t z. ,C s , 6 -4.~7
C~,s i~ f~,,j i io,.-,-f- .,:c PA i1~.-..
-J~i f L~ !A~ C o~~K.NIL'./,~t .d C' L o"i~ ~'~Z-i= S•' 'c- "iG:' -
III. LAND USE AND PLANNING
A. Is the subject tenitory to be developed at this rime?
B. Generally describe the anticipated development (building types, facilities, number of
units).
A A
J i-~•+~ , ~~9 ~ ~~ti~ .8 i`~ tiG ~•,..~s; s... ~ri=~ .
C. Is the subject temtory inside or outside of the Metro Regional Urban Growth
Boundary?
12
Revised 11/93
. . ~ ~
D. What is the applicable County rlanning Designanon. ,
or City Planning Designation ~1ro~u.~ pt~•~y 2rs.~~ U; M~ 2--7 ...c~-~,.•• ~CNNL1f14~1:Jti..
Does the proposed development comply with applicable regional, counry or city
comprehensive plans? Please describe.
.
A ~ Lti~ iL ~ P~r~ L=:~ •v~z 1-.~r~~~'~..,
tu I(A A a A uL.i
Iv !L \
E. What is the zoning on the territory-to be served?
- ,
A n1 ti.' L 1cA 1v^.'
F. Can the proposed development be accomplished under current county zoning?
' ~C Yes ❑ No
II If No,---has a zone change been sought from the counry either formally or informally.
o Yes ❑ No
Please describe outcome of zone change request if answer to previous questions was
Yes.
.
G. Is the ProPosed develoPment comparible with the city's comprehensive land use plan for
the area?
Yes o No o City has no Plan for the area
, Has the proposed development been discussed either formally or informally with any of
the following? (Please indicate)
o Ciry Planning Commission ~ City Planning Staff
❑ Ciry Council o City Manager
Please describe the reaction to the proposed development from the persons or agencies
indicated above.
pY-~PasA L Cs~~t1 fs~ A('c,,.q'[)~/~
Gi t:L S
' ~cVr l~.h,wi'.~i~ ~c•p:: .
13
Revised 11/93
ilpermits H. Please indicate and/or aPProvals from a CitY, CountY, or Regional
Government which will be needed for the proposed development. If already granted,
please indicate date of approval and identifying number:
APPROVAL PROJECT DATE OF FUTURE
. .
FILE # APPROVAL REQUIREMENT
Metro UGB Amendment
City or County Plan Amendment
Pre-Application Hearing (City or County)
Preliminary Subdivision Approval
Final Plat Approval
Land Partition
Conditional Use
Variance
Sub-Surface Sewage Disposal li
Building Permit
Please submit copies of proceedings relating to any of the above permits or approvals
which are pertinent to the annexation.
I. If a city and/or county-sancrioned citizens' group exists in the area of the annexation,
please list its name and address of a contact person.
Y 6_1 v..
IV. SERVICES AND UTILITIES
A. Please indicate the following:
1. Locarion and size of nearest water line which can serve the subject area.
L.i.,, i1, !Z L. •-C sELL~ v;
/ b /W- P1L Lk- .0AW, `
l
~t _ E.t ~ % ,L•
, f T 5 A/' 2=- . ACi'
~2--••
14
Revised 11/93
. . • ~ ~
2. Locsrion and size of neazest sewer line which can serve the subject azea.
n.,
A .,i-f), Q p S~-s .~i_ ~~:::°~•2~ .
3. Proximity of other faciliries (storm drains, fire engine companies, etc.) which can
serve the subject azea
~ .
1~ ~ 5 ra Z'
r
5 i ve,- i%*:. L -4517 .4 .3
, 4. The time at which services can be reasonably provided by the city or district.
LlPoAji L cj f'A/t7V 7\ '0:,;
5. The estimated cost of extending such faciliries and/or services and what is to be
the method of financing. (Attach any supporting documents.)
i:.S;iA^^~-b Cc>S-I L,1i l.L •3C (L..: u...i-J f F-T~2 A,vn iryS,• S
Gj 5~..5~►~ TL6 A P.PL.c,4'1a.~ ~I,-' P.A~-'~ A /'PZ.~ .
6. Availability of the desired service from any other unit of local government.
(Please indicate the government.)
15
Revised 11/93
osal is resentl incIuded within the boundaries of
B. If the temtory Pescribed in the prop p y
any of the following types of governmental units, please so indicate by stating the name
or names of the govemmental units involved.
City Rural Fire Dist
. S,f.m;if ..i;,,sA,-, ~e...w; County Service Dist. ~•ti~ Sanitary District S'~•
Hwy. Lighring Dist. Water District
. Grade School Dist. Drainage District
High School Dist. Diking District
Library Dist. Pazk & Rec. Dist.
Special Road Dist. Other Dist. Supplying Water Service
C. If any of the above units are presently servicing the territory (for instance, aze residents
in the territory hooked up to a public sewer or water system), please so describe.
' 1~'~: Sf►-i:2~ F+r`S P1ri (~i,.n~J '"v~.,^,;~=.~'.F"'ti= ~r A./\-:Riu,a S414oc:L
4AL.D
APPLICANT'S NAME G~T o F -r~ c:.~
MAILING ADDRESS i 3 ~ 2.S S w 0..:.~
C,A 2-S GE cl -11
23
C;; iu- nC,I-k _ Qj> ~•A l. G'AE
TELEPHONE NUMBER (Work)
(Res.)
REPRESENTING
DATE:
16
Revised 11/93
0 •
C17''r OF TlGARD, OREGON
NDMENT/ZONE CHANGE/ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDI~NT APPLICATIOK
CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Bog 23397
Tigard, Oregon 97223 -(503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY
CASE N0. --?,~C}A 9~i-4-0b'3
OTHER CASE NO'S:
RECEIPT N0. N M '
APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: P-)/
DATE: fZ.7 j9 S
1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted:
PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION L~,S~0 ScJ -~/~,J ~S i• ~A) Application form (1)
~
p "I22~ B) Owner's signature/written
TAX MAP AND TAR LOT N0. ZS I46C, J 16 U authorization
i ,J~(C) Applicaat's statement
SITF SIZE A~C (pre-app check list)
PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER*Ju,A)ht £ ~
`.2~( JCgre~r.Y ~
Z(D) Filiag fee 3355'0"'•)6v---L.
a4 - Zsc;s --f ~ 6e-c
ADDRESS 14 5Lc> $c.J ~~.3= PHONE -o -7 ev - Additional iaformation for Compre-
CITY 7) 6 .k1?,6 ZIP Z3 "12Z3 sive Plan Map Amendments/Zone Changes
APPLICANT* _IZ(E) Maps indicating property
ADDRESS PHONE location (pre-app check list)
CITY ZIP (F) List of property owners and
*When the owner and the apnlicant are different addresses within 250 feet (1)
people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record ~G) Assessor's Map (1)
or a leasee in possession with written authorization (H) Title transfer instrument (1)
from the owner or an agent of the owner with written
authorization. The owner(s) must sign this
aonlication in the space provided on page two or
submit a written authorization with this application. DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE:
~13~ 1 ~s
2. PROPOSAL SUM'4ARY Z~ieF C.JAjC(:F J
The owners of record f the subject property FINAL DECISION DEADLI,YE:
request aG-;...vuo 23;a- e^n
aa-e-t (if COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION:
a licaSle) from
PP 2- ~ to i1'c.~2o /'1F4~'~
and a Zone Change from u,aSLc •cr-t 2-(, to
N.P.O. Number:
OR
The apoiicant requests an ame lto the Planning Commission Approval Date:
following s>Dev of omprehensive Plan
or Communitment Code
City Council Approval Date:
' 0737P 23P
ev'd: 5/87
9
• •
3. List any variance, conditional uses, or other land use actioas to be considered
as part of this application:
4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachmente
described in the attached informatioa sheet at the time you submit this
application.
I ' S. TIiE APPLICANT(S),SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be
attached to or imposed upon the subject property.
• B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights
granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and
limitations of the approval.
C. All of the above statements and the sta[ements in the plot plan,
attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the
applicants -so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this
application, may be revoked if it is found that any such etatements are false.
D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including
the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving
or denying the application.
DATED this -'7- ~day of J Ul-y 19
SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property.
ILd J-16
I
(KSL:pm/0737P)
• •
I
27 July, 1995 I
Harry E. & Judith A. Jeffery ~14520 SW Fern St. I~
Tigard, OR 97223
Ph. Day 684-7505/Eve. 524-0437
City of Tigard I
,
Planning Department
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223 'Re: Request for annexation into the city.
We hereby request annexation into the city of tigard for the reason
of being able to sub-divide our 1.88 acres into two lots and gainig
access teD city services.
Sicerely: w
Harry E: & Judith A. Jeffery
~I
I
I
~ PMALGBC FORAI
PETITION FOR ANNEYATION TO THE CITY OF T! 6A2 D , OREGON
T0: The Council of the City of GA R D , Oregon
We, the undersigned property owners of and/or registereci voters in 'he area described below,
hereby petirion for, and give our consent to, annexation of the area to the City.of
j G,q n,D . If approved by the city, we further request that this petition be
forwarded to the Portland Metropo[itan Area local Cmvernment Boundary Commission for
' the necess;uy procedures as prescribed by ORS 199.<190(2).
The property to be anneYed is described as folJotivs:
,
(Insert Legal llescription /iere OR attacli it as EYl:ibi't "A
s C T41c LoT / j 6 o
P~~~- or= 1-°r ft7 1(4"-D yA cf'C.Lzs .
17
Revised 1I/93
P E T I T I O N S I G N E R S
NOTE: This petitron rrmy bo sipnod by quvbfiad persons ovnn thouUh they may not know their proparty desctiption or precinct number.
SIGNATURE PRINTED fVAME 1 AM A:• ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PRECINCT 0 DATE
PO RV OV LOT # 1/4 SEC. T R
? /HS~Q Sw i~E1E/~ 5r.
f'- ' NA~2RY ~JgFFEl:y V Gn 2D or2 7741 11146 2S ~U! DI q 3 7'•ZS-9s
~clDlr /~fSzO a~ r=-z2N sr•
~H ►e _ 0 orz 7ZZ3 ~s a) 9 3 -zs-
.
' PO = Property Owner
RV = Repistered Voter
OV = Owner Votet
IFx,4T'A" i
~ .
D i sP' laY ProPer,tY. Recor•d II
Pr,operty ID : R4813E6 2S14BC-01100 (Real Estate) I~
Legal Bescription: HANDY ACRES, LQT RTS 1E 8 17, ACRES 1.68
i
Owner, ID ; 16E007 Prop Class : 1012
' JEFFERY, HARRY E R JUDITH A Neighborhood: HNDY '
13975-A SW RACIFIC HWY Year• Bui lt : 1991
TIGARD, OR 97223 Living Ar,ea : 288E
5ale Date : 11/27/89
Sa1e F'r•ice : 29,000
Situs : 14520 SW FERN STREET Deed Type
Inst N~amber~ ART0220!
Code Area : 051.84
Exemptions : 1994 Rroper•ty Values
Mort Lender: - Impr•ovements $ 158,410
Land $ 68,700
1994 Tax Status Total Assessed $ 227,110
Cur•rent Levied Taxes : 3,125.31 Exemptions $ 0(-)
Special Assessments . Taxable $ 227,110
' No Taxes Due
Depr•ess the RETURN key :
. . .
.
PMALGBC FORM #4
- CERTIFICATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND MAP
` I hereby certify that the description of the property included within the attached petition (located on
I
' Assessor's Map
i
has been checked by me and it is a true and exact description of the property under consideration,
i
' and the description corresponds to the attached map indicating the property under consideration.
NAME
- TTTLE C~X 7oO:Pe4f,~15~
DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF
~ DATE
~
,
1
19
Revised 11/93
DESCRIPTION FOR ANNEXATION
A tract of land situated in the Northwest one- uarter of Section 4
q ►
Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington
County, Oregon described as follows:
Beginning at the West one-quarter Corner of Section 4, T 2 S,
R 1 W of the Willamette Meridian thence N 891 43' 30" E a
distance of 100.00 feet to the True Point of Beqinning; thence N
89° 43130" E a distance of 300.00 feet to the west line of Lot 18
Handy Acres; thence N 001 42' 55" E a distance of 200 feet;
thence S 890 43' 30" W a distance of 250 feet thence N 000 43'
00" 435.76 feet to the south right-of-way of S.W. Fern Street;
thence S 890 37' 00" W, along said southright-of-way, a distance
of 50.00 feet; thence S 000 43' a distance of 635.67 feet to the
true point of beginning.
EXHIBIT "A"
Y *PUBLIC HEARO~G
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL,
AT A MEETING ON TUESDAY, September 12, 1995, AT 7:30 PM, ,
IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, CITY OF TIGARD '
13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 '
WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION:
F I LE N O: ZCA 95-0003
FILE TITLE: Jeffery
APPLICANT: Harry & Judith Jeffery OWNER: Same
14520 SW Fern Street
Tigard, OR 97223
REQUEST: Annex one parcel of 1.88 acres into the city and change the comprehensive plan and zone
from Washington County R-6 to City of Tigard Medium Density Residential, R-7.
LOCATION: The western end of SW Fern Street adjacent to the Bonneville Power Administration
easement.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW CRITERIA: The relevant review criteria are Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, citizen
involvement; 10.1.1, service delivery capacity; 10.1.2, boundary criteria; and 10.1.3,
zoning designation. Community Development Code chapters 18.136, annexation
requirements; and 18.138, land classification of annexed territory.
ZONE: Presently Washington County R-6.
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF
CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER
18.30.
ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL
ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED
BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-
2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE
HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS.
ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN
WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC
HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE CITY COUNCIL WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION
FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN
✓ TESTIMONY. THE CITY COUN•MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HE)*G TO ANOTHER MEETING TO
OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE
APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER August 21, 1995.
ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE
GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD
REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE HEARING.
INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE
TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR
DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE
CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST
PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED.
FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE, OR FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE WITH SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY SO AS TO
PROVIDE THE CITY, APPLICANT, OR OTHER PARTIES TO THE APPLICATION WITH A REASONABLE
OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND, WILL PRECLUDE APPEAL ON SAID ISSUE TO THE STATE LAND USE BOARD
OF APPEALS (LUBA).
ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION
AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO
THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A
COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TEN CENTS PER PAGE.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY RECORDER OR SENIOR PLANNER
RICHARD BEWERSDORFF AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD,
TIGARD, OREGON.
g~f[M!~i:;:i~i:Ri i!!TeN:I!:!:iy8i' i.Ci`n, " lii il:' •~tr. . J yi
~ 4 µj?Oi~fiiN'f~ dp 1 t S . :
2 ~ ..~:~iAia:?I:~'S:i'A,:[:;~:✓l'e:A. : .~1 ~ i. ~i~~
Q '•"i'~ i'` r ' 4; S 'if ' 'ii~ii .
- a ~v~:~~: ~ :y••• ` :~t•~:
. oip.,~[!~' ~ d'r' i~:~1'in~^. ~~.il:~•,.:~i:.; •:tii'~ ~ i
I i:t.:.. `rl:r! a:t 'i 5; ~,S",G. ~ . 1'~ Ei: :t>: ;:i!ES~I``~`'? , •I' ~I;i ; ~i
i!.,
i'
`g`
W
; ;
i,`:.
..:i°•ii ~i F~nR: ~J~' ~"•'d
:i>Si:;~: ~yi?il'ie: • ~T.!ii:'.
'y'!i2,?lix;'; ~::ti!Yi n 'ii ~
` i~'"d •,i n"~Ji ii
!~;i~;:,:
~
~lil
i-
€€i i~i~1
kl• M~.:'m;
; ;i::.~i~~: ',,•?st~,.::•
s~•1 s6~ ~~r.:t Ir~~ y:ty'r.',. I~ ~'I iP':6tr
+;~5~!•;'•~;r„a~;:=.~~::s:nx:,::„ ~ :
.fi.~ •tzr~ ~ yi•itiyF•iFis[ .y~iii;:i"i+ aS.!i - ::i;re.-:;;;.~~.
. r x: ~~~:4:y;k.:Yil,~s?;i
'.;t•.:y8it~i ti~~Yts':a~i'Ha5'.'i ~"•ia~;: ~m~.t:a':.:i,:.G
.;?.~*~['e'i.f;..::..:ee.::.:c.:,.::z:i§:.i'5+~;:~'<E~i?:`•';~:,~~;: ,
i~ziiEiGtiifFa ~~1E~'"'~;°::¢:~ ~ 4.«iN~ i6,i+::,: .
p,iH: ::.I;,ry;,.l•6~;. y.,tii~li~ri it R
i~ M R, :t!~>>:.
'.:€~v~.~;a,':'~•d~~;~.';,;::';,h:~:i?a:'~k'*~~,I;,~:: ~t..~~.~y;~.~; ~L i~ t:::
tr:i:~~.
: ~ • ~':~:h~"=' "r'i~'s t'° :
*:s,:;:~..i:~~ .
;5.~ ~:1,:. ~1'r:i~r?;.'.;•.;`'n'' °.j„'
..~?Li~~3:i^~:in:~n::f•:i eE
:.X"z'i'a'i~ •a'i~~y~~:`~' ^j2:i i~~
'?~?f
•iilii!: ~j~~i
.i:.
3: i °'.::J'iE~•`<;rt~~;i
!~.ifiE::. N: . L•~`:L'.':a'~3i.~~k•.~'i'i?i~ ~o-~.5.::::i~':.:ff 'a°~~~~' : ~R:
..v.%E<sYl~<.<:ui.~ :ttr':: ?:':;l'e::~'.~'~,1".: f _'.';'.~'y'iie•.':~i
~..5r'~' >a 7R.'
ti~:~i!. iF! i ~l~iid3'c:nE~!ljtieii:•a ~::i. ::i~iy
i
:i1.^.':il:~i
::q: r,:ysr: ::~i'u:~;i,ti:",:8•F ite:;t:iEK.::. .a...
I €:4:+.u;. :
' cw;,":i
~:,•.~a:f•~:n'~::~•"•>~7iH~
¢ r I• ~ 34 r.¢r::,L'"n'':. ::4i~;
;~i•,,m;a,y;~:~e~~.rrE_i: ai~h~~~:u"i~a:`:L~~'n"•i;8~e:l;i[~~:":`!:'•.i.~~irt':?:>;I. .
i"~......:. .,L....n:.
.•.7.... . ti:ui::.8:- A `:'i~:.ii
' 9.b•.:.: s•
iii;l,.:::.iw E:,'.:l:~iN~.~:: :Mtvi:!~.`•!:iiii:F.v.;; .~1~a,::yF.o-~:p `.ii~i .lF:i i:i~ n
•r•I:S2:
iEiE$i::Fe>
. ..L.... : '•!iii~3ij;":,~i3~: :i:j'v:?:!~:
:Riiii>. siii •
i::i:3;'.?!~ riii>ii~: :.r•.. ~i.i i:ii:: ai:'e.4~
:il.rx.: P:sr:n.
•Sqn.:ah!! a ..1 'i
: Y
ii
etsr.~::
it •!•1 i
{ .~'~':`f:^... .
i. .
a;:~ :i:r; :S'.'•.is: i; <'ii~ s :€[ii:'s~ 'c<i:i:i
~i'i ~::i;i's:~ ' i'4[~ i':'p•:, +:e<'.
~ it `i+~ eiil'?i '.::Y• tl:t:. i'i:i
n;iii~.f•:Y i ~ :'~:T'ti i~: ~ri<f1p:~
..":1:...•.... w'.~.w':aa£!:;1:!..wa.:~:md~.;r<.~a
c;ty m Tiqara nnnaamm y,a zons cnuw "
PlarWng oepart,,,e„t ~Rm ca" R$mcov R-, A
Zone Chanpe and MnexaUon ~ meam o~N
ZCA95-0003 - 150 0 150 Feet
Q Area wifh6f Cib tlmib
mr r5N0Annor0wir=
EXHIBIT "B"
2S,1,04BC-01000
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTR*....
•
COMPANY
ATTN: PROPERTY DEPARTMENT
121 SW SALMON
PORTLAND OR 97204
2S104BC-01100 2S104BC-01200
JEFFERY, HARRY E& JUDITH A RIEKER, DAVID TRUSTEE
13975-A SW PACIFIC HWY 14504 SW FERN ST
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
~ 2S104BC-01300
BRIGHT, WILLIAM ALBERT AND
KAREN L
14444 SW FERN ST
TIGARD OR 97223-1571
2S104BC-01500 2S104BC-01700
LUDLUM, ROBERT S HOHNBAUM, MICHAEL LEE & KARI R
LUDLUM, JOANN 14160 SW FERN ST
14065 SW FERN ST TIGARD OR 97223
TIGARD OR 97223
2S10400-00800 2S10500-01401
SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT INC CHURCHILL, MARGARET ANN & JOE
PO BOX 1754 14664 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD
LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035 BEAVERTON OR 97007
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
RIGHT OF WAY DEPARTMENT
905 NE 11TH AVE
PORTLAND, OR 97232
• •
~
CITY OF TIGARD
AFFI DAVIT OF MAI LI NG OREGON
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss.
City of Tigard )
I, Jerree L. Gaynor, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say:
That I am a Department Secretary for The City of Tigard, Oregon.
X That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR:
That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR:
City of Tigard Planning Director
Tigard Planning Commission
Tigard Hearings Officer
X Tigard City Council
A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was
mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked
Exhibit "B", on the 21 st day of Au ust, 1995; said PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF
DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER as hereto attached, was posted on an appropriate
bulletin board on the n/a day of n/a and deposited in the United States Mail on the 21st
day of Au ust, 1995, postage prepaid.
0
Prep d Notice •
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the ,Vday of 19 !kr
oFFictat~r.t. _
uvm to. JE .~:~~s ;
, rarAxrPUgL Ic-oRIEcoa
coa+wiSSIaN Nacx1e97p ~ NOTARY PUB F OREGON
b!t c M"Ol+ ExMFRE~ ^EP'r. 7. 1
My Commission xpires:
'4 COIINER t0° eAWCElLfO 1'
80I,603,800i
- - - - - - - ~ - - - - \ 100, aoa,aoo•'
I 3501,3302,10;
1400, i4o:,1so
5 , 4 isoa'na1' m
;:wa~:~
200 . - 0• n~ ,aoa~~ooo„too
sV.os Ac.
I 2 S ~ S ~ w [A YENT.•~ :,~~~00 f'~01~01 N(
I ~b . i103~ti02~t
~b 4b 100L,l100,81
LoT 42.68 . LOT 42.60 to'
~ aa o'
1200
?BAe.
I ~
o ~
n ,
f tl '
.51778 o~
N 890 ae' E
440 040 377.3' 375.3' SEE MAP
104 1100 1300 8
0.14 Aa 20.73Ae. 4.11 Ae. 2S 1 48
~ I(p ~301 I oG~' ~./OAe. N n
m 1
n t 1 s p o
z
~ I o 11f ,
~ '0 1500 ~a~ F ~
'
S09° 35,w aA~ k J6Ae, g'
aae.:s'
1000 iv s ,~Ary 3 ziti 1401
s.it Ae. ~ ~ . ~ eSb o
Ooi ~
H ~ M= 4og. o ` o
h
z a A•~ 1600 ~a ryd 1502 in ' •
9.4ak. ~ Z
pe 1700 0 ~ O
,,o'w 5oc d,t• 4.dISA •
6~444 T p 1 ip
1800 m ~
ii. rea~. o = " o" cr. .
011.9, 1900
N W p ~ ~
2~~~ ,~BPAC.
f N
,S.67i0G. p 0 Mj w O W N z
ENTER
N
)f SEC - n ' - a-' r- -
' o
1 I/4 COR. Q
o ~u
= d o
5 I -°8 4 W W `~.SN°
SEE MAP N
W = = 2S I 5DA 0
o ~
r
6 r p 3~► MS A~~~ S89° 47 L~ ,
oa _J
2001 ~ ~ = N'~ tbZ R
oe '2" • .
t.l9Ae. N ~,`9 ~
190I2T N s eao 12'F 388019,
~
337, 307. ¢oaw
w
3
a SEE MAP
2S I 4
SEE MAP 2S I 5DB o
~
W
2
v
SEE MAP .y
2S 1 5DD J J
~
W
. 2
W Z
N
SEE MAP FOR ASSE
2S I 5DC q . m PURPOSES
DO NaT R
PO R ANY ar
.
. .
4 •
. ~
' 32 33 ~ SEE MAP 2.5) ~ SEE MAP
~
IS I 33C IS I 33CD
~
• S.W.
RIST
5 4 0Sk , ct ~ y
~oQ = . SEE MAP
2S I 48A ~
, ~.q- MINDON s I.W.
W
~oa v WAINUT
SEE MAP ` •(fy ~
2S I 486 0•y s~,
' y w~aRO~T 2~ ~ ~J `t~
~
; £ 09 oA.
~
SEE MAP S •
~ YARCIA OR.
i2S I 5
z .
a .
ALNUT
~
~ r
C
I ~ a SEE MAP ~fRN SEE MAP
' 2S I 4BC 2S I 4BD
i S W . TREET
~ . .
I 7
r
a • .,S ' ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ •
800
M1ti ds.97Ae I
( ' I
• ~ ~ ~
AM
~ • ' ~
SEE MAP
2S I 4CA
R , y ~G W
~ ~SEE MAP W
~2S I 5DA 3 .
~ 0 Q
a =
~
~
.
a .
:
: , y~ . - ~..r..:i:~..:.+~:•' ,
. P~
'4 • sk ~ ~ _
,
} SEE MAP SEE MAP SEE MAP
2S I 5DD W 2S I 4CC 2S 1 4CD
x J i
Z c~ y~' • J►~
0
m
5 4 Sw
or na. ~ ~
• SCALE I100'
~SI ~gL.
SEE MAP ,
2S I 48
.
,.w. i/a I70.Oi' 170.01,
130.0e' ~ no.o1' 170.01' ITo.oi' 700 S eso ao' w 600
ioo' 800
, 1000 900 Z. /3 AC l 65 AC, 45 AG
/.90 AC. 4.94 AC.
0
J
' ~
N IO
d
M
Q I I
Z a
0 12
~
- Q 15 ~ 14 13 ~-1 r~ 1\J f
on M 10
. Yi . ~ ~ 10 ~ •
' M1
1D
, . cn 172
Z •
.1 ~
Q %72.90
Q 1900 ~
b0 I .46 AC.
-55' f- -80'- 50'
~V o I
\?p ~,t ~IH
y0 ~ < N
~
P ~ ~4~~,~~9 2~q,• N W o
a ~ I
$ 230•03' - 170 66.70' 6 41 I
O
y ' • c ~ I600 . h ~ V.~. 5~5 .94 AC. ~ 'n
~ 170 66.70~ 104.90 1500 TO
i00 i- 50'^J ~ 50~ 30.03, 200.02~
~ ~3' ! 1300 .93 AC.
0.03 1400 •9 ~ 1800
/.04 AC. 2.50 AG /.00 AC.
i 144'
ii5'
~ 20
0 Q ~ 1700 .
Q- N 4.09 AC. o
N
~
0
" 2I"
'
n
N 20 ~
~ N
~ M
a
~ 200
i
i oo , 12d
I2
n 19 g
; „ ~ /.46 ~C. '
~ - ~ 2000
~ in 0 m I~ 10 140.25'
vi
~16 ~ I tn N R -
M
10
1
W ~
J 250'
J - -
~ - I
> 1100
I W ` i ae Ac.
Z Z
O
m ~
rINIT1AL POINT , I N 98° 43' 30" E
i~0,,..•.:.,.,,,.,,..,.,.
II4 CORNER ' 300'
~
a0p'u.i.iiui.i viiiiiii.aiiii.l.bAii.ii.iioiiiii ....i.
SEE MAP
~ .2S 1 4
. ~ •
PNIALGBC FO #16
CERTIFICr1TlON OF PRUPF.RTY OWNERSHIP
- (Double Majority Method)
i
. I hereby certify that the attached peririon for annexarion of the territory described therein to the Ciry
of T' G A ➢ c ntain
I YL o s the namP ..s of the owners* of a maJonty of the land area of the
temiory to be annexed, as shown on the last available complete assessment roll. ,
`
NAME
TITLE T"~~(;~-r4wP
DEPARTMENT
-
COUNTY OF
s
IATE Z
7
i * "Oumer" means the owner of the ritle to real property or thc contract purchaser of real
property.
. P1VALG13 C FD.RM ##17
'CERTIFICATIO?V OF REGISTERL'D VOTLRS
I hereby certify that the attached petirion for annexation of territory described herein to the City of
_7-l6;A-23> _ cuntains the names oF at least a majority of the
electors registered in the territory to be annexed.
NANLE ~
TTT'j,,E enior Administrative Specialist
DEFARTMENT Assessment & Taxation/ Election Divisio
'COUN-fY UF Washinqton
DaTE July 25, 1995
18
t Revised 11/93
. .
~
PMALGBC F'ORA0#19
(This form is NOT the petrlion)
ALL OW.VERS OF PROPERTY AND/QR REGISTERED VOTERS INCLUDED IN BOUNDARY
CHANGE PROPOSAL ARErI ~
(To be completed IF the propuSal contains 10 or fewer land owners/registered voters.
Please indicate the name and address of all o%vners/voters regardless of whether thcy
signed an annexation petirion or not.) This is for notification purposes.
NAME OF OWNERNOTER ADDRESS PROPERTI' DESIGNATION
(Indicate tax lot, section number,
Township and Range)
I
(1) PA r2 L( r. JLFF~.PQY
Pysaa 5 w F-F-►2~J sr. Ti6~2D or q7ZZ3 ._rkilov S-11 7-Zs n~ c4)
~
(2) JuDiTH A. JF- FFEr2 x
r--
)fs.ZD sw Fn2A) s r, TIGM ~ 02 9712 3 r~,1) oo s1FT-,2 S~r c,d
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
20
Revised 11/93
• ~
PMAL GBC FORM #20
DOUBLE MAJORITY ly'ORK SHEET
Please list all properties/registered voters included in the propcsal. (If needed, use separate sheet for
udditional lisrings). _
P130PER'Y'IES
Propel ry Assessed Si ned Petition
Designarion Name of Owner Acres Value Yes No
(Tax Lot #s) .
H62RY E. I JuDiTH A. ~
ll00 , FC ►e 1,8s~ .2 27) 1/0 ~
~
TOTAI.S
22
Revised 11/93
. ~ ~
1'AIAL G13C F0R1tiI #21) (contitialed)
12EGISTERED vOTERS
ADDRESS OF REGISTERED - NAMF OF REGISTEiZED SIGNED PETITION
Voter Vocer Yes No
TOTALS
SU&I1LU1R.Y
TOTAL WNIBER REGISTERED VOTER.S IN THE PROPOSAL
NUNiBER OF REGISTERED VOTEKS WIIO SIGvED '2
PERCEN'I'AGE OF REGISTERED VOTERS WHO SIGNED /DL) 6L71)
TOTAL ACREAGE IN PROPOSAL ~ • ~~S
ACREAGE SIGiNED FOR SltT
PERCENTAGE OF ACRE AGE SIGNED FOR ldo vTv
23 .
Revised 11/93
z
0
- I
i
~
~
~
.I
~
~
z
- I
~
o '
Q
~
w
~
O
a
J
J
~
Z
Z
O
m
C
City of Tigard Annexation and Zone Change N
Planning Department ~ From County R-6 to City R-7 ~
Zone Change and Annexation Comprehensive Plan change from
ZCA95-0003 County R-6 to City Medium Density
150 0 150 Feet
~ Area within City limits ~
OB/D4/95 M:%GISDATTIGCOVWNNEX2
- FAX TRANSMITTAL -
*PLACE UNDER CITY OF TIGARDOGO
LEGAL NOTICE SECTION OF TIGARD TIMES ,
DATE: August 25, 1995
TO: Sue Curran, Legals (fax) 620-3433
FROM: Jerree Gaynor, City of Tigard (Ph.) 639-4171
The following will be considered by the Tigard City Council on Tuesday, September 12, 1995 at 7:30 P.M.
at the Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. Both public oral and written
testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of '
Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and rules and procedures of the City Council. Failure to raise an
issue in person or by letter precludes an appeal, and failure to specify the criterion from the Community
Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that
criterion. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard,
Oregon 97223, or by calling 639-4171.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 95-0003 (IEFFERI) A request to annex one parcel of 1.88 acres into the
city and change the comprehensive plan and zone from Washington County R-6 to City of Tigard Medium
Density Residential, R-7. LOCATION: The western end of SW Fern Street adjacent to the Bonneville Power
Administration easement. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: The relevant review criteria are Comprehensive
Plan policies 2.1.1, citizen involvement; 10.1.1, service delivery capacity; 10.1.2, boundary criteria; and 10.1.3,
zoning designation. Community Development Code chapters 18.136, annexation requirements; and 18.138,
land classification of annexed territory. ZONE: Presently Washington County R-6.
J.
~
I I i II
' I I~I 1~ f I ~ i~l, ~I
.
atMf$~~' ;
5'~ i: ~ P y+~ yl., 1~
~
i
W 5
0
4 ~ ; i.. '~r:1,•r~i~yni[~ ~ t~ . ~ , .I
...N. ~.i.:a..~r~.... vi
II t1~~1 It 41 I 1 ~ . .
.+.01111w,~
N
p annl p D partment ~ Flo. C°"M R4 A
Zone Chanpe erd Anirexa8on ~^o~nna~* wm dunoe nan
ZCA954M 150 0 150 Feet
TT PUBLISH August 31, 1995 ~s vWDdn CAV Unft esa!!n
- ,
~ • •
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ~
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
TO: lim Wieskamp, GTE DATE: August 2, 1995
FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Ray Valone
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE: ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 95-0003 A request to annex one parcel of 1.88 acres into
the city and change the comprehensive plan and zone from Washington County R-6 to City of
Tigard Medium Density Residential, R-7. LOCATION: The western end of SW Fern Street adjacent
to the Bonneville Power Administration easement. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: The relevant
review criteria are Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, citizen involvement; 10.1.1, service delivery
capacity; 10.1.2, boundary criteria; and 10.1.3, zoning designation. Community Development
Code chapters 18.136, annexation requirements; and 18.138, land classification of annexed
, territory. ZONE: Presently Washington County R-6.
Attached is the Site Plan and aPPlicant's statement for Your review. From information supPlied bY various
departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be
prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: August 14, 1995. You may use the space provided below
or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to resaond bv the above date, please phone
the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
~ you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
_ Please contact of our office.
_ Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
(Please provide the following information)
Name of Person Commenting: Qv~ WtCLC~~
Phone Number: b2.0-5943
I
~
r • I
I
1:~'•':• i
I
I
Z
I
Q
~
Q
I
~
f"
L~•:
y
_ . I. .
2
~
~
O
Q
Q-~
w
~
O
a
J
J
W
2
m
C
i
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
:S
rE:
City of Tlgard Annexafion and Zone Change N
Planning Department ~ From County R-6 to City R-7 ~
Zone Change and Annexation Comprehensive Plan change from
ZCA95-0003 County R-6 to City Medium Density
- 150 0 150 Feet
~ Area within City limits
08104lBS MAGISOATWIGCOVWNNEX2
_ _ . w • •
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ~ I
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
TO: Lee Walker, USA DATE: Au ust 2 1995
FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Ray Valone
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE: ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 95-0003 A request to annex one parcel of 1.88 acres into
the city and change the comprehensive plan and zone from Washington County R-6 to City of
Tigard Medium Density Residential, R-7. LOCATION: The western end of SW Fern Street adjacent
to the Bonneville Power Administration easement. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: The relevant
review criteria are Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, citizen involvement; 10.1.1, service delivery
capacity; 10.1.2, boundary criteria; and 10.1.3, zoning designation. Community Development
Code chapters 18.136, annexation requirements; and 18.138, land classification of annexed
territory. ZONE: Presently Washington County R-6.
Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various
dePartments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a rePort and recommendation will be
prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: August 14, 1995. You may use the space provided below
or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone
the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
~ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
(Please provide the following informa[ion)
Name of Person Commenting: M , d, ,VIA9 ke:LRI
Phone Number: ln '~~0 L'`7!X
•
z
0
~
Q
mo
~
N
2
~
C
Q
Q,O
w
I
~
O
a
I
J
J
W
2
m
' C
i
E~
City of Tigard Annexation and Zone Change N
Planning Department ~ From County R-6 to City R-7
Zone Change and Annexation Comprehensive Pian change from
ZCA95-0003 County R-6 to City Medium Density
- 150 0 150 Feet
~ Area within City limits
08104l85 M:1GiSDAl1TIGCOVIANNEX2
- ' • •
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ~
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
TO: Brian Moore, PGE DATE: August 2, 1995
FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Ray Valone
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE: ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 95-0003 A request to annex one parcel of 1.88 acres into
the city and change the comprehensive plan and zone from Washington County R-6 to City of
Tigard Medium Density Residential, R-7. LOCATION: The western end of SW Fern Street adjacent
to the Bonneville Power Administration easement. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: The relevant
review criteria are Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, citizen involvement; 10.1.1, service delivery
capacity; 10.1.2, boundary criteria; and 10.1.3, zoning designation. Community Development
Code chapters 18.136, annexation requirements; and 18.138, land classification of annexed
territory. ZONE: Presently Washington County R-6.
Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various
departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be
prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: August 14, 1995. You may use the space provided below
or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond bv the above date, please phone
the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. I
_ Please contact of our office.
_ Please refer to the enclosed letter. ,
_ Written comments provided below:
I
(Please provide the following information)
Name of Person Commenting: -±Zl~ ~400a,-=
Phone Number: S190 -1351
5-1 -'ctS
u y ~ •
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ~
CITY OF TIGARD
OREGON
TO: Michael Anderson DATE: August 2, 1995
FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Ray Valone
I Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE: ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 95-0003 A request to annex one parcel of 1.88 acres into
the city and change the comprehensive plan and zone from Washington County R-6 to City of
Tigard Medium Density Residential, R-7. LOCATION: The western end of SW Fern Street adjacent
to the Bonneville Power Administration easement. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: The relevant
review criteria are Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, citizen involvement; 10.1.1, service delivery
capacity; 10.1.2, boundary criteria; and 10.1.3, zoning designation. Community Development
Code chapters 18.136, annexation requirements; and 18.138, land classification of annexed
territory. ZONE: Presently Washington County R-6.
Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various
departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be
prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: August 14, 1995. You may use the space provided below
or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to resaond by the above date, please phone
the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
,
~ PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
~ V We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
_ Please contact of our office.
_ Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below: '
.
(Please provide the following information)
Name of Person Commenting: ~i(/ > •
Phone Number: ~
~
z
0
~
a
~
~
~
z
~
~
0
a
e-°
W
~
~
a
J
J
W
2
Z
m
t
~
City of Tigard Annexation and Zone Change N
Planning Department ~ From County R-6 to City R-7 ~
Zone Change and Annexation Comprehensive Plan change from
ZCA95-0003 County R-6 to City Medium Density
- 150 0 150 Feet
~ Area within City limits !Q~~
08104185 M:IGISDAl1TIGCOVIANNDC2
Y ' • •
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ~
• CITY OF TIGARD
' OREGON
TO: Kelley lennings DATE: August 2, 1995
FROM: Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Ray Valone
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE: ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 95-0003 A request to annex one parcel of 1.88 acres into
the city and change the comprehensive plan and zone from Washington County R-6 to City of
Tigard Medium Density Residential, R-7. LOCATION: The western end of SW Fern Street adjacent
to the Bonneville Power Administration easement. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: The relevant
review criteria are Comprehensive Plan policies 2.1.1, citizen involvement; 10.1.1, service delivery
capacity; 10.1.2, boundary criteria; and 10.1.3, zoning designation. Community Development
Code chapters 18.136, annexation requirements; and 18.138, land classification of annexed
territory. ZONE: Presently Washington County R-6.
Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various
departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be
prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: August 14, 1995. You may use the space provided below
or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone
the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hal) Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
i
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
~ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
_ Written comments provided below:
(Please provide the following information)
r
Name of Person Commenting:
-~t/g
Phone Number:
. • '
z
O
Q
~
H
y
Z
~
0
a
w
~
O
a
J
J
W
2
2
m
C
E~
.l~
City of Tlgard Annexation and Zone Change N
Planning Department ~ From County R-6 to City R-7 ~
Zone Change and Annexation Comprehensive Plan change from
ZCA95-0003 County R-6 to City Medium Density
- 150 0 150 Feet
~ Area within City limits
08/04/85 M:IGISDA'nTIGCOVIANNEX2
08/17/95 09: 26 $509 526 2538 TV FIRE' MA1tSHAL 0001/002
~
k4~ Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue
~Fire Marshal's Office
~h
~ 4755 SW Grit'fith Dr.
Beaverton, OR 97005
(503) 526-2469 FAX: (503) 526-2538
~
~
~
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
M ~ /f
TO:
From:
~
~
Date:
RE:
MIN
~ Note:
z- /M
C-~ „ 4-1:~ d-v►
I
✓ I
Number of pages: ~
x~
• (incJuding cover shcet)
, nv1
di
~ If you do not receive all pages, please call as soon as Possible (503) 526-2469.
~
RL
i
..r-,.. Thank you.
/P`pS1N Vq<\
~ "Working' Smoke Detectors Save Lives
~~AF'a 17E5GJ
tpjwc~
08/17/95 09:28 00509 526 2538 TV FIRE MARSHAL
r ,j.. . .s.•.. C :-t~ ''r. 't;
. ' '''3'' ~ ~ t I'' i j':: S' ;1`•! ~'el
: e::: :i: : ;.s.., ~ :`i: . ,
:.,i~. ~•i i; ~;i;i t ' ;i;a
. :a,: ::i: :-e •;•:..•i .:.a . 'i:6• S. i ;~se"i' •
.ti:~ .j: ' .:y ' ..i ;,y:;'
~::i: ;c:c:::•.=.•••::=•.•ji:••:::c~: i ...j~ i .i~?~'i
- E9c'i'::iii: iis : .:s:. •s • . :t'i yi:
:.t . _a 1 •~;i} . . .ri~i
:''s':•.':ei::' ::i:;:i::: :~i;:'~ ':c6::':es~• . l u. ii •.3':
: : : • '.';:i' ;•':i; . : i•a ~ s :
::'I ~ ::Sti':::i}: ;::i:~ : :i'. ,•;i' • i.: . 'i':• • .Sf.~~ ~ . . :1 lj
S:. ::7:;::2:: .:?ti: : ~;:i1• :;.f:: ~151;. ' :3.i~ l~j:i.e F•.
::s:.E:: : cE:9° ::ii •:h. ~ :;s:. •~y::~ s.: ;.c.i :,?I
i ~ :y :-s ;i i~.i :
.~.i•: :~.•a•:•
•i~i~ ° ~:I ~s.. .
:;i : :r ::S• .;5: • ~.1:`:3 4~7. :j. ~~..j~~.
~ ':2'.• ~ .:t. .7.i,ti: :':::::;:::$.i~
°~tie ~3 :'c•; =:i%: 't•:Y•ty';iet~'.i is:
:;1~:~•!••••,•
~ .
':f::•i••:: ~i'.'.:
~t i ~ i~ • ii=t:iif!~ i'i(~~ ~'i
tp ~ii'ii~''~i~iis
::t c ~:'scia E•. .
::i :1•.t.•.,•e•=
i: :ig s:f 4;i: fFa: f;-
a :_~':~:?i3:'•~t:4:•~ i~;~Sit;; :+ti
a : : : .i :~~~s, jFFs}°;~g :
. : ;iz:: •,•,::•j•i• ~
i;i: : ~ :s::: s=:=:~•:•~+ ~
'.'•6i:l:i:::i~:?
i 1'i. .s.~t:,
W ' iii?i'-!s?i ~ i`E={isir~l:3ii •s':
O j2fiFiia=f
•rr ; ` ~ ~yf},f 4 .~.s: t F'; ~:~s
d I;:'E:F*'{~ ~
::s;: ::!.1'S•IS~=i3~~ i i:i ;=i; '=e=1
~e:;: : • . ~.'•iti'i i ~ ti a
•e::~:: i.,...:. .
: 9•.:.a.4 : ~ '
••:i:.~ • ~ s~; ~i
~'~s:~ :.4'?; 'i'i' ~•'I 4 • i i i ~i~~
:;}•.•::qy:i?T; 9;?~ :•i~:,~~i F{° t;yifi;"
s .~i•:~i
i~:•.".•:;~ i Si.F[i i•: i= i• 1
; :::e: :;~;:f 4s•=:si ss•. 1?l;•~ 'i•F''st
';•~iS:'~ ' . } t,
~ ~:?::i' :~::e eii;::':i•:ii ;~~ii:?iiii?i: iI;e '•ii's'•; i;i:i~~ ;
• t...,-, •
ui ~:i~'s; ; •i ;':'.'::i-:- :i'::,:;.?=i~l ;et ij:~:,•.•=i:i'•9
~ c::•~ ~ :j:?i::;;' i! 'SSi;:={ i .?.e•?~ t•'• 's
~ ,::c?::'?: q:•:::5 :S ~x•~; ; ~S3 q4ij~=~ t;ii :;i c :s,
O :::1.~; • i.•:~::: . ~
..~:i :•:t.:;: •:•e•'•:• . c.• 'e's 1' :
m Fs i:t.n z i i's..~:~ :ii
:'.:,i: ;ii;s:s: iii:=7~=12~}:i 4;s~i~4i°•i
~?s ; t: ?'i s"" ' . • , .
. 3 y i•~ 1:SSS •t 1'1
•:ii'=~ i : Sjf'SS .•.S •.S4 : ! ~ t~it S ' ' ~t S•j'j~ 't~
. i•.: ..i•:;. ~ ti . ~ F 7• .
::;s : :::::::::icE•r: ='`i:iift:~:~:•:: ~•.3 :j. . i i
'::3::=••: . :::L:~:•.•_:_'.•~ : i'.`:~~ ije~S... i :S:t ~ t~
a:~.. . i.S. F . l~: '
+:~i=i:~:'•r•r':•.'-: : ::~i~::::•s•:•: :•s•: : ?:~i~•.'::~: : .3i: c.: •:U. . s•.
'•'•:i : 's;:=:; : : ;i i:i;~'s';';: ;:=~:;i;:•; .
ir: :i'•:~' :%:~•.'•e•. . 1,., .,F, : '•.;c: ,
.'=S"-:'t ~ :~1 .•s~:•:t•:
:i~ ~:i:: ::fG: : 3.•
, :iJ:ii i:~:~ :5~~: `S : i~S•~
..•S•: • :~i'7::•G'i~:~'r.:~l~ ..=i`:: . . . .TS '
•~f:: .=i:: : i~:
:•f^i=:
. i'' . ..:t
. :t.:
.
.•-y .
i
C:~i~:•:~:: :~Y t . !
~'_~'••~:::•:~:=:e:~ .S • F.:
;?:i ::~c=:~•;'= 1_;:i:i•.'-c::: i';'•: r: : : ::e : , i~ a a
~ ; ::f:: s'i:' ;:s:• :~i: :~s~s:% : ii.~~ =:fi.:i; .~S
.zi. ~.I., t .
i. i
.i
i
. 3. i'
s: t
s c.
:°•s= i , i•.
:~'s•: t s
S!: .
-3•
r
:•r:= :-t . o
•~t :
!
=2 .
::i::
~5=72
i . .j.G~.
'C2•1
p.i.:
.j
'•C'y'.% ;Ci7; .q .
: vs
: F...
ej
:.i•.
i:•.
t•. .
•i
3.
1
t
i
i
~ s
S•: . =S
:ii•': :cia
•4•
7 :i:!'
~l7~7
.,j
.
• ~31:
~:tie" ='ei•'.•~ F~ i;~
l
3 •
::S ::5~.....: . :
...5• {i ::t :~'~:::i::~':: :
:.i;. .s. ;:i; ;ij:: ~ i~:;.i; ~I.i,I tip•}i; :i;?~' :?sy :
;~:si: : E=i~i: ~ :i::::::; :~~•::9i~ : ::e~~~: ...i~ : :i°~ • ..e. . . F•. ~ •.s •
:~ii'• .t •.s;i• . ~
:~i~i ::i : •r ::3;: :3 !?s ii;{: ~i
~ci•. ~ S , .
t
:;i •.i
! ~ • . .
, S..
i :.i..
:•i•: ~%i~:
~i
.-i
. •S .
:'=i :•%':i!'.•'.•%i-'.•: ~j~::::: : ~ [7; :y
• S
i : :
: .S .
s
:;:T~ ?:•:~•~=%=~•'.••,:7~.;.: :-S7 : : : i.... ...i.: . fi:.,s : S ty
~i{iyi; •,•''::;:i ~ :;j i=. ~,ij: :~••a
'•Y' :i
i.:
jSj:;
~F
•S .
. •t F:
i,,.. ..~.s..~.s.:.... .~c: i. ..y a : :
:':i : ' 'i'' •.'::'s':'•'.'; E•: . t. . i;
rs: i•.•. t• ~ :•:=:c•.'•::'t':=~: : :~i' ~:~1':'~~i: : :~iiiiir :'c: :cs?i?':•t;:s?•::: : •s• = i~: .
r,<:::;. .:s:~ .,s.- , i,.,t,i .i_ = . £ ~ i i :i : ir:
~ ::i:,::,•a::;::••• :°•icinfii~•.•;•.••:.:.-=: : :•.r: • irrr:•:=:i i . . c c l.~ .
:i
:':~i=: ~:~:~•.'•:::•.'•s~:: • e ...F.
. .d .
e, ~:i~ . ' .s i' • i .
'•i`. : i• S•i:'. : S'
i
~~L~: t . '.i•
i
~.s
:'•i~:
: o..'.
S~'s'•i : i: t • ' r
.
.•s ~
;~Sii 3c ° .::s . s
o !
i
c
: : a • •t~. .::f~
S e i:Ei:: .
:..s .
•i
i
SS
: :5~:'• ~'.•i': ~='~:•S:~i•i : i~ t•~
...s..~.,.. . .i•.•t•.:..•.~ . : .Y's s : S t • I .
::.t.~.:-.-.•.; . i . i. . 7 .
::=i°•~ ~ •.•ii"~'.': ~ ~ i'::~'•': i:::~:'~'e'i':: . } .~:I . .i
:::s::: :•:~::~i-:'::=: :~si:: :~5=-: : : : :~:;`•:••s:i:?::,-: : :??:i;:':'; '.•t ; :i•.'•: E; il:::~ ; S~:};a.: ` o
i ;i; : :3; • i: • , •3 ei?' 3 i~•.'.i°'~ • ie~ i• ••i-~:~o
••rs ;f~ ~:°•i=:: :=i~~ E: •.'it::~~ ..,t :.:jo-::•• ° tr r.~ v:. ~ :
i:'s'~; :::~,;:~a:i::;._.. c;i'sii :y i : ' ; 4 i:•: .•s; ? j:it:i. .,.=t' .i:;
.,.i ::t~::~.: :z;:.:.:'.:r~: s~:•t::: ~ r: s; :::::i:S::..;.;..--• ' ~i'i : .r t:~i~r. .~~;'s .~r: .
~ :i•~r': : 1:~:;:~e:'s•:; ; ;:;:;s :.:::::.:..::::•s;:;:;:; : e;~si: ; s::. y:~ ; ?}.t: - s : 3e i
::.:i::::::::::.°: ::r: :S_::•r~ :s::::•:: : ; r ' . f
i:i•,% ..5.: •:3.• : i:. .:i. : f~~: :;l: ,ti~ ~ :4
; . s ,~i: :1'F''s'
:•:i~ F'i' i :•a c
'•E ti •
t ••t
t
4.
•i.f 3•. .
;S i:; ;i;e?';-';•.';•.'-aiii<; •."°;•.•.';s:.
s
.3.:: ,.s•: .:t:
i S•i i '~7''
::•i'%:T.•i': : ::':~:i't=i~' S
t:5 : %2 : :•S:: . 1.. t .t . 1
:~i:% •~y 7 i
i~
~ S . .5...,.
..i•.
1.i i .
•'1 . ~
:~i•: ~Si~
2 F :•s•
•i:
!.S•' i
:1•: .
1•f .
•s:
~t. .
•
.•y:•' : 'j'
:i j . .
:~i•: '~i~: . j,.
!
i
.j
.L . .
i
S c .
e:i .
' s . ..s. .I' . .4.!..c .ci
~,i,• :SSj: :o-: . . . . . . ~5=: . .::1 : . . ~
, i:'s'::,. N
pnneYadon and Zone Ghange ~
Gity ot Tigard ~From Gounty R-6 to City R-T
Plannin9 DePartment Comprehensive P1an change hom
Zone Chan9e and Annexation Caunty R-6 tn Ci1'Y Medium Dens'dy 1 50 0 150 FeQt ZCA95-0003 T5;zTT
~
~ qfea within CiW limits
981~a9S MaGtSG'RTIGGONANNF~
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
fW.ti 110N UST FOR LAND 115E b DEVElOPMENT APPU T10N5
. .
. : : . .
:
/~(~~~~~r~~~~~•~
. : . • : ~ ~ ~ ~ :
. . : . ; > :
. . . .
.
. . . . . . . ~ : • : . i.::;•:2;i:z:;~::::;:: ::,?:;;22;;:<':::::: :;v':.;:~:
....M~~i~f ~i~Gfll. ...a......~.~.;~.,.:.y..~..:.•::~'•[:.:t°:tC::~':.
• . . . : ~ .
. . .
.::<o:;~ . • . . . . : , : ~ . :
•
. .
~~.~~~:::i';:..:;~.~... . :;:Oi::~'ir:^.i:;;`•. :•i~~:::
. ; . .
. , . . . . . . . . . . . ;
. . . . _ . ~ . , .
~nJ r:SST
{ A}
CR Area: ~ c9 m(O " Placed for revlewtn LJbrary.QT 8ook CPO NO.
-
• . •:;.ti.>.:.:.::;::,
. . . : . <::v:<.v~~ ~i:~~~i:.: : 4~:i: :
. . : \.~:~~:~i~?\~::: ~ . . . ...~.,~:~:::"::ii.::v}' `::\ii31::~:•i::~i\C:.~:~i~\:~T~\~. C•ri•
.......:..~:...v.J::iY.ii::~~:•::•:: •..:.~:..~:•:}.•i::.:'::ir:i:•:i?~...~.~;.~:Li:i:•::..... ~ w..~~\~..\;
?.:`::.;:;::.i}.i.... . .\....~ti.~n......~..... ~~.v+i`~~i\~:y.v.~::•:•:~:::~..,4..
.:.v ~ . •v\.. v
• •ii:.i ::ti~::~vi :ii:v: i: :•:.~~:...t.... i.~...:: ~:~ii:.}~.\t:..~ :.~..::.i.~~:.. ~ ~ •:.L:..;..~. : .:~~:ti•:i.v: ~~...i'~i ~:i ~ •
. .\?.•.v. t• N:.
. . ~ : ~ : v.:::::::.: v: v:... ..t : . . v~.`\
. ::ti•ri{•
..:..~~:.;:~:C•~ :~\h:~:i~::~':::~::'f}+~~::::~t~~
::..:::'::v.~...~•.•: ~.~..\:..~.;,.v.~..~...~.~.:.:.nv:~:~C:::.~~~. ♦ ♦
.•::..c...~:>:..av...o.o,.,a•::~~:::<~:\iti:~a~`:.~::+~:~'Y`., \:i~~x.~,,,..,...;:::..•:>:..•>:..'"~:
,-.:.::....~.,...:.,..c: ~.:~c:.:.:.:: ti. ~.\r: ~~j•~U:~aC,)>: ~:•::a,::.:>:>;,~~.:.: •:::a: x>:. ~ :::~;.:>:~::::o-:;<:::. . . >a.
.
: . . . . . . . •
_ BLDG. DEPTJDave Scott, .A,, onar fE1fG.DEP1rJMlchael POLICa D~TJKelley Jennings - OPOWTtONS/John Acker, CfT1f ADWN1Cathy Wheatley, Anderscn, CO1LD6Y. DEPTJD.S.T.'S
RADV. PWGJCaroI landsman, WATER DEPTJMIChael Mlller, ao.mou»~~oo.~orow..,:
.
.
. .
qRL' MARSHALL UNIRED SEIAIERAGB AGENCY _ TUALATIN VALLBY WATER DIST.
Cene Blrchell SWM Program/lee Walker PO Box 745
Wa. County Fire Dlstrict 155 N. prst Street BeaveKOn, OR 97075
(pict-up box) Hillsboro, OR 97124
.>aFFECM.<Juaisnrcnops::.::
, WA. t0. DEPT. OR LAND USB & TRANSP. ~ AIEiRO AREA BOUNDARY COIMYISSION M6TRO-GREENSPACfS
150 N. pr5t Avenue 800 NE Oregon SL 116, Sulte 540 Mel Hule (CPA'Y10A'y
Hlllsbaro, OR 97124 Partland, OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue
Portland, OR 97232-2736
Brent NRts cCPA'g STATB HICHWAV OMSION
j~ Jlm Tice aGA'9 Sam Hunaidl ODOT/RECtON I
Mike Bomeson (En IneeA PO Box 25412 ~ Laurle NlcflolsoNTrans PIan
9 . ning
" Scott Ktng tCPA'sl Portland, OR 97225-0412 123 N.W. Flanders
Tom HartV cCVrrent Planning App-sl Portland, OR 972094037
_ LYnn Bailey tCUrrent Planning App's1 OREGON DLCa (CPA's20A's)
1175 COUtt Stre2G N.E. _ OTHER
CiT1f OF BEAVERTON Salem, OR 97310-0540
larry Conrad, Senior Planner ~ CtTY OF PORTLAND
PO Box 4755 U71f OF DURHAIYI Planning Dlrector
Beaverton, OR 97076 dty Manager 1120 SW 5th
PO Box 23483 Portland, OR 97204
GTY OF bNG GT1f TlgarC, OR 972813483
Clty Manager C1TY OF LAKE OSYYECO
15300 SW 116th t1TY OF TUALATIN City Manager
King Gty, OR 97224 PO Box 369 PO Box 369
Tualadn, OR 97062 Lake Oswego,-OR 97034
. . . . .
~ . . . . . . . : . . .
SPECiACACENClES::::::<
)(GQVERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC 2C PORTLAND GEHERAL ELECTRIC COLUMBIA CABLE CO.
Jim WlesKamp, Engineering Brian Moore Craig Eyestone
PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Schalls Ferry Rd. 14200 SW BMgadoon Court
Tigard, OR 972813416 BeaveROn, OR 47007 Beaverton, OR 97005
~NW NATURAL GAS C0. vnaneaosnmwa METRO AREA CONOIIIUNICATIONS TR!-M6T TRANSIT OEVELOPMENT
Scott Palmer Fn IM n,-:sM Jason Hewitt Kim Knox, Prolect Planner
220 NW Second Avenue 1Win oaks Technology Center 710 NE Holladay Street
Portland, OR 972093991 1815 NW 169th Place 5-6020 Porttand, OR 97232
~ Beaverton, OR 97006-4886
TC1 GABLEV1510N OF OREGON ~__US WEST COMMUNICATIONS SOIRNERN PACIFlC TRANS. CO.
lintla Peterson Pete Nelson Duane M. Fomey, PLS-Pro)ea Eng.
3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 800 NW 6th Ave., Raom 324
Porttancl, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97204 Union Statlon
Portland, OR 97209
. . . . .
. . : STATE:;AGENCIES.::'
AERONAUTICS DIV1510N (ODOn DIVISION OF STATE LANDS US PCSTAL SERVICB
- COMMERCE DEPT.-M.H. PARK FlSH & WILDUFE Randy Hammock, Growth Cord.
_ PUC DOGAMI Cedar Mill Statlon
_ DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL OUAUTY Portland, OR 97229-9998
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
_ onHER h:~otrez"o~~cmt
- . _
. . ~ ~ ~
WASHIN~TON ~OUNTY OREGON
I"-1 ' SCALE - 40
. ,
~ ~
~
~ S~E SEE M~P S~E MAP
t0 25 ! 2S ! 4B8 2S ! 4BD
~
tD
~ N.NI COR.OF S,W. 1/4
Q~ ~ ~ ' I. 1~ 170.Oi' ItQ.O~~ 170.
~ ~ ~ro.a~' ~~o.o~ i~o.o~ ro o, ~pp 130.06 S 89° 30 W 3~0 ~~Q ~ ~ 6~ ~
~000 ` 900 ~e2 ~oe. 49 AC. 2.13 AC 1.65 AC. 1.45 AC~._ ~ .
I.90 AG 4.94 .4C ~
O
~
. t70.4►' s-
~ ~ ~ C ~ ~
j„~ w a ,5B AC. N ~ ~y ti }
~ M O M3 M N 1
~ N ~/~p ? ~
d1 J ~ - ! 19.98 W ~ Q
500 ~ ~
t!y I ,at a~,^ 1
'Q I / ~
~ l- ~ a ~ - o ~ o~ a ~ ao ~i ~
M ~ ~ _ ~ _ ( C.S. 13165 l : ' ~
- . !t2.20` Z 9S, ~
~ I
a4' . . • ~ ~
.iZ ~ Q s3 ~ A ~,f2.90 ~
~ f~ ~
~~~0 8~~0• .48 /iC. r~~
, 1,00 A~ 3s .
~e ~ t.~' •-so-•. r~
~ ► ~340 ~w .46 AC.
, ~P ~ m i~'
A• ~ ~ y h j~ -
, ~M a a
SEE MAP y ~ " ~ • 3 wo ~ ~ 4~33 N a
~S~ i ~'3 ~ " ~ ~ ~ g a~o.rr~ .
w _ 0 123.54'
~~QQ p i . 3.5~
o: ' ~ .94 ~ ~ ~ 2400 ' , , ~za ~ a. • ro
10o so , ~ ~ 2oo.oz` ~ 2. T2 AC: 3ao3 ~ AC
130~ ~~00 .93 ~ 18 0~ - q~ ~ , ~2a.sa'
~ j,~ l.04 AC. 2.,~0 , ~ / aJ QC i 138.42_ 144 s _
il'S~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ir
122,42 ~ n ~ ~ 7~~ ri a
Y. n o N 4,09 AC. °f 220Q
a° ° N 2,4/ I
a m J - !
'o, o ~ m ~ h h ~ r
~ N ~ M N ~
C 2Qa ~
~ ~ ' ~ ~ - _
~ . i ~ 2~ 20
~ L ~ ~ K1 ~ ~ ~ as ac.
~ M r ZOaO ~ o°~ r 140• 25
h ~ F rri~.~~ ~ 'Q ~ ~
r, ~ r r'' ,r r ~ 1' r
~
~
~
W ~
J z5a'
J r
I ~OV
~l.~ 1,88 AC.
~
~
~ , ~ ,
~ ~
~
INITIAL FOINT ~ a
~ ~ l . N 88° 43 30 E ~~n~
~lq 6tasrltn ~ ~w ~ ~ ! V
17 SEE MAP
2S I 4
2S 1 4 V C