Loading...
12/06/2021 - PacketPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA – December 6, 2021 City of Tigard | 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 | 503 -639-4171 | www.tigard-or.gov | Page 1 City of Tigard Planning Commission Agenda MEETING DATE: December 6, 2021 - 7:00 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: Members Remote via Microsoft Teams Link to virtual hearing online: www.tigard-or.gov/virtualPC Call-in number for public testimony: 503-966-4101 Public testimony call-in time is between 7:15 p.m. and 7:45 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL 7:00 p.m. 3. COMMUNICATIONS 7:02 p.m. 4. CONSIDER MINUTES 7:04 p.m. 5. TIGARD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN (TSP) UPDATE 7:05 p.m. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT CASE NO. CPA2021-00006 / DCA2021-00004 Staff: Senior Transportation Planner Dave Roth PROPOSAL: The proposal is the result of a long-range planning project to update Tigard’s Transportation System Plan (TSP). The proposal adopts Tigard’s updated TSP and amends Chapter 12 of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan with new goals and policies related to Tigard’s transportation system. It also makes minor changes to Chapter 18.660 of the Tigard Community Development Code that regulates roadway cross sections on SW 72nd Ave in the Tigard Triangle. 6. OTHER BUSINESS 8:35 p.m. 7. ADJOURNMENT 8:45 p.m. December 6, 2021 Page 1 of 6 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes, December 6, 2021 Location: Members Remote via Microsoft Teams Call-in number for public testimony: 503-966-4101 Testimony call-in time: 7:15 p.m. and 7:45 p.m. Link to virtual hearing online: www.tigard-or.gov/virtualPC CALL TO ORDER President Hu called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: President Hu Vice President Jackson Commissioner Brook Alt. Commissioner Miranda Commissioner Quinones Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Schuck Commissioner (K7) Tiruvallur Commissioner Watson Commissioner Whitehurst Absent: Alt. Commissioner Dick Staff Present: Tom McGuire, Assistant Community Development Director; Dave Roth, Sr. Transportation Planner; Doreen Laughlin, Executive Assistant COMMUNICATIONS ² None CONSIDER MINUTES President Hu asked if there were any additions, deletions, or corrections to the revised November 29, 2021 minutes; there being none, President Hu declared the revised minutes approved as submitted. TIGARD TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN (TSP) UPDATE CASE NO. CPA2021-00006 / DCA2021-00004 PROPOSAL: The proposal is the result of a long -UDQJHSODQQLQJSURMHFWWRXSGDWH7LJDUG·V 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ6\VWHP3ODQ 763 7KHSURSRVDODGRSWV7LJDUG·VXSGDWHG763DQGamends &KDSWHURIWKH7LJDUG&RPSUHKHQVLYH3ODQZLWKQHZJRDOVDQGSROLFLHVUHODWHGWR7LJDUG·V transportation system. It also makes minor changes to Chapter 18.660 of the Tigard Community December 6, 2021 Page 2 of 6 Development Code that regulates roadway cross sections on SW 72 nd Ave in the Tigard Triangle. President Hu asked the following questions for the record: Does any commissioner wish to declare a conflict of interest? None. Does anyone in the audience wish to challenge any member of the Planning Commission for bias or conflict of interest? Please call in to raise your concern. None. Commissioners, have you had any ex parte communications? None. Does anyone wish to challenge the jurisdiction of the commission? Please call in to raise your concern. None. STAFF REPORT Dave Roth introduced himself and said he was there to present the staff report for the 2040 Transportation System Plan (TSP) update . He would take them through a PowerPoint presentation which will review the proposed update to the TSP and review proposed amendments. The commissioners will consider public testimony that had been received in writing and also what may be presented at this meeting. He noted the proposed 2040 TSP and WKHWHFKQLFDODSSHQGL[DUHDQFLOODU\GRFXPHQWVWR7LJDUG·V&RPSUHKHQVLYH3ODQThere is also a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for revising the transportation specific Chapter 12 (in the staff report). Additionally, there·s a proposal for the Development Code Amendment regarding the Tigard Triangle section within the Development Code. Dave acknowledged the project manager from the consultant team of Fehr & Peers, Kendra Brieland. Matt Hastie from Angelo Planning was also present. Kendra and Dave will make the presentation and then all three will be available to handle any questions after the presentation. Dave presented his PowerPoint (Exhibit A). He noted the 2040 TSP serves as a blueprint for transportation investments; as a coordination tool with regional agencies and local jurisdictions; as an important component of prudent & effective land use choices; and is a compilation of existing & future transportation needs related to pedestrians, bicycles, transit, automobiles, freight & emerging technologies. He went through the key themes of th e document: Completing our streets to serve everyone; breaking connectivity barriers with OR-217 crossings; continuing to invest in our trail system; highlighting bottleneck issues and roadway alignm ent opportunities; and partnering on regional mobility solutions. He went over the 2040 TSP Vision and Goals and Key Themes. (Exhibit A pp 6-12.) At this point he handed the presentation over to Kendra from Fehr & Peers. She focused on the public involvement process for the TSP. She noted that despite the global pandemic, they had managed to connect with over 2000 community members between January 2020 and August of this year. She touched on how they went about their public involvement, what people wanted to see improvement on such as new sidewalks near schools, high priority safety locations, pedestrian corridors, bike network improvements, etc. She spoke about having a focus on transportation needs and infrastructure improvements and went over project co sts and more. (Exhibit A pp.14 ² 22). December 6, 2021 Page 3 of 6 Kendra then turned the presentation back to Dave who went through the additional implementation activities that the plan recommends . Dave then reviewed the proposed amendments, potential future amendments, and next steps (Exhibit A pp. 23-34). Next Steps ² Public Hearings x Planning Commission reviews (December 2021) and City Council considers (January 11, 2022) adoption of 2040 TSP, and amendments to Comprehensive Plan and Development Code. x 2022 and beyond: Plan Implementation STAFF RECOMMENDATION x Recommend approval to City Council to adopt the 2040 TSP as an ancillary document to the Comprehensive Plan. x Recommend approval to City Council of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA2021-00006) x Recommend approval to City Council of the proposed Development Code Amendment (DCA2021-00004) PUBLIC TESTIMONY Planning Commission received oral testimony at the hearing from three individuals. x George Brandt, 11651 SW Penn Court, Tigard, member of the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee (TTAC), and member of the 2040 TSP Community Advisory Committee, spoke in favor of the 2040 TSP. Mr. Brandt indicated support for adoption of the 2040 TSP and highlighted the need for investment in neighborhood side walk gaps. x Ezra Hammer, Land Acquisition Manager for Taylor Morrison, made comments related WRFRVWVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKSURYLGLQJ´PLGGOHKRXVLQJµSURGXFWVLQ7LJDUG0U+DPPHU voiced support for recommendations contained within the 2040 TSP technical memorDQGXPWLWOHG´6\VWHP'HYHORSPHQW&KDUJH5HFRPPHQGDWLRQVWR6XSSRUW763 8SGDWHµRQSDJHRIWKH7637HFKQLFDO$SSHQGL[ x Ruth Harshfield, 12505 Southwest Karen Street Tigard, chair of the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee (TTAC), and member of the 2040 TSP Community Advisory Committee indicated support for the 2040 TSP and related Comprehensive Plan and Development Code amendments. Ms. Harshfield made comments related to the need to provide equitable and climate -friendly transportation options, support better transit service, and increase connectivity for Tigard residents. STAFF REPLY Dave Roth thanked the callers for their input and Kendra Brieland DGGUHVVHG6'&·V 6\VWHP Development Charge Recommendations) because Ezra Hammer had brought up some December 6, 2021 Page 4 of 6 thoughts about them. She noted that Mr. Hammer and staff both agree that there are a lot of improvements that could be made , not only to help tailor the program a bit more to support housing goals, but to help tailor the program to better s upport multi-modal transportation delivery goals. She said there are a lot of good examples throughout the region where other SDC programs are funding multi-modal project lists, and that SDC programs should work hand in glove with the TSP. She said, ´So now that Tigard is updating the TSP, this is a great opportunity to update the SDC program ² MXVWWRPDNHVXUHWKDWLW·VRSWLPL]HGWRGHOLYHUWKH TSP program, but also fit within the realities of development within Tigard.µ QUESTIONS Several Commissioners asked clarifying questions prior to and during their deliberations regarding: x Why the proposed Development Code amendment extends the Fee in Lieu project completion requirements to a 5-year window. Answer: Ultimately this comes down to providing more flexibility to complete projects on a more realistic WLPHOLQH)HHLQ/LHXSD\PHQWDJUHHPHQWVDUHW\SLFDOO\RYHUVHHQE\7LJDUG·V(QJLQHHULQJGHSDUWPHQW x Concern over a perceived conflict with the proposed Development Code requirements for curb extensions and right-turn lanes utilizing on-street parking lane space? Answer: The proposed cross section requirements are designed to accommodate multiple competing needs on the street. While curb extensions are not required if they conflict with bus movements, the same would hold true if the parking lane space were used for a dedicated right -turn lane. x :K\WHUPVVXFKDV´VWUHVV-IUHHµDQG´FRPIRUWDEOHµDUHXVHGLQGHVFULELQJWKHIXWXUH SHGHVWULDQDQGELF\FOHQHWZRUNVDQGQRWWKHWHUP´VDIHW\"µ Answer: Safety of the transportation system is an overarching policy objective of the 2040 TSP. We need WREHFDUHIXOZLWKWKHXVHRIDGMHFWLYHVVXFKDV´VDIHµDQG´XQVDIHµWRGHVFULEHWUDQVSRUWDWLRQIDFLOLWLHVDV doing so can potentially expose the city to liab ility issues. x Why the 2040 TSP indicates that only 61% of residents in poverty have access to transit in Tigard and how this compares to other cities of similar size. Answer: This is often a function of land use and proximity of housing to transit corrid ors, but it is something that the plan strives to address through prioritizing the needs of these populations aligned with 7LJDUG·VVWUDWHJLFYLVLRQ x :KHWKHUWKH763ZLOOVXSSRUW7LJDUG·VSRVLWLRQLQJIRU)HGHUDOLQYHVWPHQWVDVSDUW of the recently passed Federal Transportation Bill. Answer: The 2040 TSP sets Tigard up well for both Federal and State funding opportunities by SULRULWL]LQJDUDQJHRISURMHFWVRIGLIIHUHQWVL]HDQGVFDOH,W·VLPSRUWDQWWKDWWKH763LQFOXGHVODUJHU aspirational projects that we would otherwise be unable to fund solely with local dollars. x Whether the SW 72nd Ave cross section requirements in the Development Code Amendment were broadly supported by the adjacent business community and what type December 6, 2021 Page 5 of 6 of outreach was conducted. Answer: The city and its consultant team conducted a thorough outreach and engagement program over the course of a year that included multiple open houses, online web surveys, and stakeholder interviews of businesses within the Tigard Triangle to develop the proposed cross section requirements for SW 72nd Ave. With development in the Tigard Triangle and along SW 72nd $YHRFFXUULQJDWDUDSLGSDFHLW·V important that we have a consistent cross section requirement in place to avoid inconsistent r oadway improvements. DELIBERATION The commissioners each gave their thoughts on the proposed TSP. All who spoke were very enthusiastic in their support of the proposed 2040 TSP and the related amendments as presented at the hearing. FIRST MOTION Commissioner Roberts made the following motion: ´I move the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to City Council for the 2040 TSP as an ancillary document to the Comprehensive Plan.µ The motion was seconded by Commissioner Quinones. VOTE TO APPROVE 9 to 0 - Motion to approve passed unanimously. SECOND MOTION Commissioner Roberts: ´I move that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to City Council for application CPA2021-00006 and adoption of the findings contained in the staff report and on the testimony rece ived.µ The motion was seconded by Commissioner K7 Tiruvaller. VOTE TO APPROVE 9 to 0 - Motion to approve passed unanimously. THIRD MOTION Commissioner Roberts: ´I move that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to City Council for application DCA2021-00004, and adoption of the findings contained in the staff report and based on the testimony received.µ The motion was seconded by Commissioner Watson. December 6, 2021 Page 6 of 6 _______________________________________ Doreen Laughlin, Planning Commission Secretary __________________________________ ATTEST: President Yi-Kang Hu VOTE TO APPROVE 9 to 0 - Motion to approve passed unanimously. HEARING DATE FOR CITY COUNCIL January 11, 2022 OTHER BUSINESS President Hu shared with the commissioners that KH·GEHHQ reminded by the City Attorney that the only time DYRWHIRUDEVWHQWLRQLVDOORZHGLVZKHQWKHUH·VD n actual conflict of interest. He asked that the commissioners keep that in mind and noted that Tom McGuire had agreed to be the one to remind them in the future. Tom thanked the commissioners for their hard work and noted that this meeting was the last one for the year. He thanked outgoing Commissioners Melanie Brook and Cole Whitehurst for their time on the commission (each had served four years). They will both be very missed. Tom also noted that Commissioner John Roberts had been selected to serve a second term and that alternate Commissioner Miranda would become a voting member for the next year while filling CommisVLRQHU:KLWHKXUVW·VUHPDLQLQJWHUP+HDOVRZHOFRPHGQHZYRWLQJ&RPPLVVLRQHU George Brandt who will be starting his 4-year term officially in January 2022. ADJOURNMENT President Hu adjourned the meeting at 8:45 p.m. City ofTigardDecember 6, 20212040 TSP Planning Commission Public Hearing Purpose of Hearing‡Review proposed update to the Transportation System Plan (TSP)‡Review proposed amendments‡Consider public testimony The Transportation System Plan TIGARD ON THE MOVE,WKH&LW\RI7LJDUG·V7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ6\VWHPPlan (2040 TSP) charts a roadmap for providing equitable mobility in our community over the next 20 years.dŚĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ^LJƐƚĞŵWůĂŶŝƐĂŶĂŶĐŝůůĂƌLJĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƚŽdŝŐĂƌĚ͛ƐComprehensive Plan TIGARD ON THE MOVE,WKH&LW\RI7LJDUG·V7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ6\VWHPPlan (2040 TSP) charts a roadmap for providing equitable mobility in our community over the next 20 years.The 2040 TSP Serves As:A blueprint for transportation investmentsA coordination tool with regional agencies & local jurisdictionAn important component of prudent & effective land use choicesA compilation of existing & future transportation needs related to pedestrians, bicycles, transit, automobiles, freight & emerging technologies. ͞dŝŐĂƌĚ͛ƐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶsystem advances our Strategic Vision to be an equitable community that is accessible, walkable, and ŚĞĂůƚŚLJĨŽƌĞǀĞƌLJŽŶĞ͘͟2040 TSP Vision and Goals Key Themes Key ThemesCompleting Our Streets to Serve Everyone‡Recognize that ourstreets play host to more than just cars.‡We can do this by:9Completing the system for walking and biking9Reviewing speed limits9Making the most of 2-3 lane cross sections where planned 5-lane sections would drastically increase costs andimpactneighborhoods and conditions for active transportation Key ThemesBreaking Connectivity Barriers with OR-217 Crossings‡Prioritizetwo new active transportation crossings of OR-217:9SW 95th Avenue9Tigard Triangle‡Adequate vehicle connections into the Triangle are also considered Key ThemesContinuing to Invest in Our Trail System‡Moving forward with key projects:9Closing gaps and improving roadway crossings on Fanno Creek trail9Design and construction of the Red Rock Creek Trail9Modernization/upgrades to existing trails Key ThemesHighlighting Bottleneck Issues & Roadway Alignment Opportunities‡Thinking systemically and improving circulation by advancing needed transportation studies to identify right-sized solutionsat locations such as:9North Dakota Street/Tiedeman Avenue/Greenburg Road area9Scoffins Street/Hunziker Street alignment at Hall Boulevard Key ThemesPartnering on Regional Mobility Solutions‡DĂŶLJŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĂƌĞŶ͛ƚĨƵůůLJǁŝƚŚŝŶdŝŐĂƌĚ͛ƐũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐ͗9Upper Boones Ferry/72nd Avenue/Durham Road Circulation Study999W Regional Investment Strategy9Bull Mountain Corridor upgrades9Partnering to improve transit access, speed & reliability‡These projects require regional coordination, but Tigard can be a leader in carrying these efforts forward Public Involvement Public InvolvementPublic involvement for the development and review of the 2040 TSP was achieved in several ways: ‡Involvement by citizens on the Community Advisory Committee (CAC)‡Targeted digital and printed advertisements‡Assistance and review by agency representatives on a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)‡Public hearings as part of the adoption process‡Virtual events and online surveys Transportation Needs and Infrastructure Improvements New Sidewalk Prioritization Bike Network Improvements Transit System Improvements Modal Plans & Projects Modal Plans‡Pedestrian‡Bicycle‡Motor Vehicle‡Transit‡Freight Constrained Project List by Mode Project List By Cost Implementation Activities Implementation ActivitiesIn addition to projects and program, the TSP recommends several additional activities and topic areas to support implementation: ‡Vehicle and transportation system electrification‡Transportation sector GHG reduction strategies‡Posted speed zone reductions on several roadways‡Future TSDC methodology updates to support city affordable housing objectives‡Future Tigard Development Code updates‡Micro-mobility transportation options‡Curbside management and parking Proposed Amendments Proposed Amendments‡Comprehensive Plan‡Chapter 12: Transportation‡Development Code‡Minor updates to Chapter 18.660 Proposed Amendments‡Comprehensive Plan: Chapter 12‡New and updated language‡Updated overarching goals‡References, rather than lists detailed policies‡Updated findings Proposed Amendments‡Development Code: Minor updates to 18.660‡Cross sections and right-of-way requirements for SW 72ndAve within the Tigard Triangle‡Bike Parking, access, above ground utilities, screening, other minor housekeeping changes Potential Future Amendments‡Updated cross sections for all roadways‡Changes to off-street parking standards‡Bicycle parking at transit facilities‡Notice to transportation agencies‡Traffic impact analysis refinements‡Significant effect on state facilities‡Vehicle electrification‡Mobility hubs Staff Recommendation & Decision Alternatives Staff Recommendation‡Recommend approval to City Council to adopt the 2040 TSP as an ancillary document to the Comprehensive Plan‡Recommend approval to City Council of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment(CPA-2021-00006)‡Recommend approval to City Council of the proposed Development Code Amendment(DCA-2021-00004) Decision Alternatives‡Recommend approval to Council with no changes.‡Recommend approval to Council with minor changes.‡Continue hearing to a date certain to consider public comments or major changes. Next Steps Next Steps‡Public Hearings‡Planning Commission reviews (December 2021) and City Council considers (January 2022) adoption of 2040 TSP, and amendments to Comprehensive Plan and Development Code.‡2022 and beyond: Plan Implementation Thank you STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 1 OF 16 CPA2021-0006, DCA2021-0004 Hearing Date: December 6, 2021 STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: Tigard Transportation System Plan Update FILE NO: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) 2021-00006 Development Code Amendment (DCA) 2021-00004 PROPOSAL: The City is proposing to update the transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan. The update includes a comprehensive replacement of the 2035 Tigard Transportation System Plan (2035 TSP) with an updated version titled the 2040 Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP). As part of this update, the City is also proposing to amend the Development Code to implement needed amendments identified in the Tigard 72nd Avenue Corridor Study. APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: The City of Tigard APPLICABLE Tigard Community Development Code Chapter 18.380, 18.390, 18.710, and 18.790; PROVISIONS: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, and 12; Metro Code 3.08 (Regional Transportation Functional Plan) Titles 1, 2, 3, and 4; Oregon Transportation Planning Rule OAR 660-012; and Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, and 12. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 OF 16 CPA2021-0006, DCA2021-0004 SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The City of Tigard adopted the most recent Transportation System Plan in 2010. The City, in conjunction with representatives of the technical advisory committee (TAC) and community advisory committee (CAC), and the consultant teams from Fehr & Peers, Alta Planning + Design, JLA, and Angelo Planning Group began work on the project at the beginning of 2020. The committees met four times each over the course of project development. Additional public outreach included five virtual events, three digital surveys, and a project website with materials and opportunities for residents to comment. The project team conducted work sessions with the Planning Commission and City Council to provide an overview of the TSP requirements and plan recommendations. The Planning Commission work session s were held on 12/2/19, 12/7/20, and 4/19/21 and City Council work sessions were held on 9/15/20 and 10/26/21. The proposed 2040 TSP establishes goals and policies for transportation systems in the City through the year 2040. Key goals are related to safety, environmental and community health, quality of life, livable neighborhoods, economic vibrancy, and maximization of transportation resources. The plan recommends projects to address the following needs: stronger streets network, urban upgrades and active transportation, connectivity, transit, transportation system management and operations, and special study areas. These projects are illustrated in Figures 13 through 15. Tables 11 through 16 provide project descriptions and planning-level estimated costs. The TSP project also reviewed Development Code provisions and Comprehensive Plan policies to ensure consistency with the proposed plan and with state and local law. The project also includes review of a variety of previously adopted local plans to ensure that those efforts are reflected in the TSP where needed. A subset of the recommended Development Code amendments is proposed to be adopted in conjunction with adoption of the 2040 TSP. The remainder will be recommended for adoption at a later time after they have undergone additional review, anticipated within the next one to two years. Comprehensive Plan policies will be updated to reflect the project’s vision and goals and Comprehensive Plan narrative will be updated to reflect key findings from the TSP update process. Transportation policies will be found in the 2040 TSP. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the 2040 Transportation System Plan as an ancillary document to the Comprehensive Plan and recommend approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to the Tigard City Council as provided by the public hearing process. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 3 OF 16 CPA2021-0006, DCA2021-0004 SECTION IV. APPLICABLE PROVISIONS, FINDINGS, AND CONCLUSIONS A. TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (Title 18) Chapter 18.380: Zoning and Text Amendments 18.380.020.A Legislative zoning map and text amendments shall be undertaken by means of a Type IV procedure, as governed by Section 18.309.060.G. FINDING: The proposed amendments are being reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as set forth in the chapter. This procedure requires public hearings before both t he Planning Commission and City Council Chapter 18.390: Decision-Making Process 18.390.020.B.4 Type IV procedures apply to legislative matters. Legislative matters involve the creation, revision. or large-scale implementation of public policy. Type IV matters are considered initially by the Planning Commission with final decisions made by the City Council. FINDING: The proposed amendment will initially be considered by the Planning Commission on December 6, 2021. City Council will consider adopting the proposed amendments after the Planning Commission has made their recommendation. A hearing date before the City Council has been tentatively scheduled for January 11, 2022. 18.390.060.G The recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based on consideration of the following factors: 1. The Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines adopted under Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197; 2. Any federal or state statutes or regulations found applicable; 3. Any applicable Metro regulations; 4. Any applicable comprehensive plan policies; and 5. Any applicable provisions of the City’s implementing ordinances. FINDING: Findings and conclusions addressing the factors list ed above are provided within this report. Chapter 18.710.110 (Legislative Procedure) and Chapter 18.790 (Text and Map Amendments) 18.790.020.A 18.710.110.A Approval process. A legislative amendment application is processed through a Legislative procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.110. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 4 OF 16 CPA2021-0006, DCA2021-0004 FINDING: The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) and Development Code Amendment (DCA) are being processed through a legislative procedure, as provided in TCDC Section 18.710.110, using the approval criteria outlined in TCDC Section 18.790.020. Additionally, TCDC Section 18.710.110 requires two public hearings: one before Planning Commission (scheduled for December 6, 2021), and one before City Council (scheduled for January 11, 2022). Following a recommendation from Planning Commission, City Council will make a decision on this application. These requirements have been or will be met. 18.790.020.B Approval considerations. A recommendation or a decision for a legislative amendment application may be based on consideration of the applicable legal requirements. They may, but do not necessarily include: Oregon Revised Statutes, Oregon Administrative Rules, one or more Statewide Planning Goals, Metro’s Urban Growth Management Functional Plan and any other regional plans. FINDING: The following city, regional, and state provisions apply to the proposed CPA and DCA: Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.380, 18.390, 18.670, 18.710, and 18.790; Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, and 12; Oregon Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, and 12; and Metro Regional Transportation Functional Plan (Chapter 3.08) Titles 1, 2, 3, and 4. As detailed in the findings below, the applicable city, regional, and state provisions are met for this pro posal. CONCLUSION: The applicable provisions of the Tigard Community Development Code are met. B. TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Chapter 1: Citizen Involvement Goal 1.1 Provide citizens, affected agencies, and other jurisdictions the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. FINDING: The TSP update process included numerous opportunities for community members and affected agencies to participate in the planning process. The progress of the Tigard TSP update was guided by a TAC and a CAC. Membership consisted of more than 20 members who represented interests and expertise from a number of stake holder viewpoints, including various City departments and committees, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Washington County, and TriMet. Advisory committee meetings were held through virtual meeting platforms to balance equitable access with COVID-19 safety precautions. The TAC and CAC were responsible for reviewing technical aspects of the TSP update, including all technical memoranda, and providing input to represent various agencies, organizations, and community groups. Committee members met a total of eight times. City staff also provided monthly briefings to the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee (TTAC). The TTAC consists of community volunteers and acts as an STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 5 OF 16 CPA2021-0006, DCA2021-0004 advisory body to City Council and staff. All TTAC members were provided opportunities to share feedback throughout the course of the project and provide input on the draft TSP. In addition to the established advisory committees, five virtual events and three digital surveys were held at key junctures in the planning process to solicit input from other Tigard community members. At these virtual events, participants were asked to share their knowledge and concerns and comment on existing transportation conditions and future improvement projects, programs, policies, and priorities for the transportation system. The City’s Planning Commission discussed the draft 2040 TSP and related proposed implementation measures during three work sessions that were open to the public. Work sessions were held on 12/2/19, 12/7/20, and 4/19/21.Similar work sessions were also conducted with City Council on 9/15/20 and 10/26/21. The first public adoption hearing is scheduled before the Planning Commission on December 6, 2021; the City Council will subsequently hold a public hearing and consider the Planning Commission’s recommendations. It is tentatively scheduled for January 11, 2022. The project included a dedicated webpage that provided project information and updates throughout the course of the project. The website served as a source of information for the general public, as it hosted all project technical reports, TSP goals, and information for community engagement. Goal 1.2 Ensure all citizens have access to: A. opportunities to communicate directly to the City; and B. information on issues in an understandable form. FINDING: As noted in the finding to Goal 1.1 above, citizen involvement and public participation activities for the 2040 TSP were and will be addressed through the following activities and project elements: - A CAC comprised of citizens from various City committees that met four times over the course of the project. - A TSP project website that included project updates, all technical reports, and links to engagement opportunities. - Five virtual events and three digital surveys where the community could learn about aspects of the project and provide comments and feedback. - Adoption hearings with the Planning Commission and City Council. Chapter 2: Land Use Planning Goal 2.1 Maintain an up-to-date Comprehensive Plan, implementing regulations and action plans as the legislative basis of Tigard’s land use planning program. FINDING: Existing state, regional, and local plans, policies, standards, and laws relevant to the TSP were reviewed and evaluated to guide the development of the 2040 TSP (See TSP Technical Appendix). Current land use patterns and potential impacts were also addressed through an existing and future condition analysis (See TSP Technical Appendix). STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 6 OF 16 CPA2021-0006, DCA2021-0004 Coordination between state, regional, and local agencies was accomplished through both the Project Management Team (PMT), which included key City staff members, and the TAC and CAC. Members of the TAC and CAC that provided guidance on the development of the TSP included representatives from multiple agencies. The 2040 TSP includes a revised policy framework that will serve as the basis for transportation policies in the City’s Comprehensive Plan (see Chapter 3). The policy framework included six new goals and 34 policies to guide future land use decision-making towards achieving Tigard’s Strategic Vision. The goals address safety, environmental issues, community health, quality of life improvements, multimodal livable neighborhoods, economic vibrancy, and efficient use of transportation resources. Chapter 9: Economic Development Goal 9.1 Develop and maintain a strong, diversified, and sustainable local economy. FINDING: Chapter 3 of the 2040 TSP provides the policy framework and evaluation criteria that guided the development of the planning process and will continue to guide future transportation improvements. In it, Goal 5 addresses economic vibrancy by “accommodating movement of people and goods and creating equitable opportunities for economic development.” The goal includes three policies for providing a framework to guide decision-making towards that goal. Evaluation criteria developed for the updated TSP provided a process to evaluate project alternatives relative to TSP goals (see Table 3). The evaluation criteria included three components that evaluated how well a project would create new or improved connection to regional destinations, increase capacity for motorized and/or other modes on arterials and collectors, and how well it accommodates freight needs. Chapter 6 of the 2040 TSP identifies transportation projects, which if built, would help achieve the City’s Strategic Vision. Nearly half of the 74 improvement projects, categorized as Stronger Streets Network projects, will improve some of the City’s busiest street corridors that provide access and connections to the City’s economic areas. The corridors include 72nd Avenue, Greenburg Road, and Hall Boulevard (see Figure 13 and Table 11). Goal 9.2 Make Tigard a center and incubator for innovative businesses, including those that focus on environmental sustainability. FINDING: In addition to Goal 5 and it’s supporting policies, there are several other related policies in the 2040 TSP with a focus on creating or strengthening the connection between businesses and sustainable transportation infrastructure. Policy 1.3 emphasizes coordination between the City, businesses, and other stakeholders for developing projects with the greatest regional benefit. Policy 3.3 directs the City to require development adjacent to transit to provide direct pedestrian accessibility that will result in increased access and foot traffic for businesses. Policy 6.5 calls for the City to use parking and curb management strategies in ways that will support adjacent land uses and community activities while maximizing the efficiency of transportation resources. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 7 OF 16 CPA2021-0006, DCA2021-0004 Portions of the TSP Pedestrian and Transit modal plans in Chapter 4 anticipate increased transit service to meet growing multi-modal needs, particularly in the Tigard Triangle area. The modal plans support the development of transit-oriented developments (TODs) through land use strategies and partnerships, particularly around major stations and transit centers. The TSP identifies several transportation projects that support the City’s mixed use areas of Downtown, the Tigard Triangle, and Washington Square Regional Center. Nearly all of the stronger street projects identify improvements to corridors adjacent to one of these areas (Table 11 and Figure 13). These include: eight street improvements to Greenburg Road adjacent to the Washington Square Mall; four projects in the Tigard Triangle that will upgrade 72nd Avenue to urban standards; and. three projects near Downtown Tigard that include improvements to Pacific Highway (OR 99). In addition, the 2040 TSP identifies a need for a new local connector transit service in the Tigard Triangle (Project T- 1); support for high frequency transit through improved transit treatments on Pacific Highway (OR 99) (Projects T-2 and T-3); and the need to complete a study of Highway 99W that will develop a corridor vision, review needs, opportunities, and constraints, identify potential corridor improvements and funding sources, and develop a strategy to equitably accommodate growth (Study-3). Goal 9.3 Make Tigard a prosperous and desirable place to live and do business. FINDING: Chapter 3 of the 2040 TSP provides the policy framework and evaluation criteria that guided the development of the planning process and will continue to guide future transportation improvements. In it, Goal 1 addresses prosperity and desirability by creating a “safe, comfortable, and connected transportation system for all users.” Key among the eight policies under this goal is policy 1.1, which seeks to prioritize projects with the greatest benefit to the community and the region through multi-modal projects that enhance mobility, safety, and connectivity. Key elements of the TSP’s modal plans address partnerships to identify regional mobility solutions to support improvements outside of the City. Coordination with surrounding jurisdictions is important to ensuring the improvements identified inside the City are supported and support regional travel needs and requirements . Chapter 10: Housing Goal 10.2 Maintain a high level of residential livability. FINDING: The estimated future travel demand is based on population forecasts in the year 2040, existing travel patterns, and existing and planned/funded transportation improvements. The TSP update project modeled travel demand patterns for the year 2040 using Washington County’s Travel Demand Model to help determine where system improvements were needed. The City is expecting significant growth over the planning horizon. Areas that are expected to experience the most growth include the River Terrace area, Washington Square Regional STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 8 OF 16 CPA2021-0006, DCA2021-0004 Center, the Tigard Triangle, and Downtown Tigard. Transportation projects have been identified to support the anticipated growth. The transportation improvement identified in Chapter 6 and the implementation efforts identified in Chapter 7 are intended to support the City’s anticipated growth within a financially constrained environment over the next 20 years. Many of the projects identified in the TSP, as well as the goals and policies of the TSP, will help improve the livability of Tigard for its residents by providing improved access, mobility, and connectivity via walking, bicycling, and transit; achieving environmental sustainability goals; and improving connections between homes, businesses, shopping , community facilities, and other amenities. In addition, 2040 TSP Goal 4 is to “Create livable neighborhoods that are designed to improve multimodal connections while discouraging unsafe interactions” and the policies included under this goal provide additional guidance regarding improving livability. Similarly, 2040 TSP Goal 3 and its policies focus on “improving quality of life for all, including historically marginalized and underserved communities.” Chapter 12: Transportation Goal 12.1 Develop mutually supportive land use and transportation plans to enhanc e the livability of the community. FINDING: The 2040 TSP includes a Land Use modal plan in Chapter 4. The Land Use modal plan addresses existing and anticipated types and intensities of land uses. It acknowledges that most of Tigard is zoned for resident ial use but also includes three distinct mixed-use districts with unique needs and challenges. As noted in the finding to Goal 10.2, the 2040 TSP has identified transportation improvements that will accommodate the expected growth through the year 2040. Goal 12.2 Develop and maintain a transportation system for the efficient movement of people and goods. FINDING: The Motor Vehicle modal plan in Chapter 4 includes a freight component. The plan recognizes that movement of goods through freight is essential for the City and the region. Figure 12 illustrates freight routes in the City as designated by Tigard, Washington County, and ODOT. The designations inform where improvements may be needed for the safe and efficient movement of trucks and to minimize negative impacts on local streets. As part of this planning effort, new freight designations were identified on SW Roy Rogers Road and on SW 72nd Avenue south of Highway 217. The existing and proposed freight route designations helped inform needed improvements for projects along those corridors (see Project S-17 through S-21 and S-28 through S-30 in Figure 13 and Table 11) Goal 12.3 Provide an accessible, multi-modal transportation system that meets the mobility needs of the community. FINDING: The 2040 TSP continues to classify streets using a functional class ification system (Table 5 and 11). The functional classification system seeks to balance the mobility STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 9 OF 16 CPA2021-0006, DCA2021-0004 of all road users by defining the intended function of the roadways. Functional classifications range from Interstates which serve the longer distance mobility needs to Local Streets that provide neighborhood circulation and direct access. The classifications are balanced and distributed throughout the City to provide the greatest amount of mobility for all road users. The 2040 TSP also identifies a pedestrian and bicycle network (Figure 4 and 8). Each network uses a classification system to identify the desired use of the street. The pedestrian and bicycle networks define the following core elements: Pedestrian Corridors to support higher pedestrian activity; Major Street Bikeway to support biking in key transportation corridors; Neighborhood Greenways to create comfortable environments for walking and biking; and trails to support non-motorized mobility. For pedestrians and bicyclists, high levels of mobility are the result of direct connections to destinations and routes. Chapter 6 identifies investments that will strengthen alternative mobility needs by improving Neighborhood Streets. Examples include sidewalk infill and new bike facilities along corridors such as 79th Avenue, Murdock Street, and Watkins Avenue (Projects AT-5, AT-22, and AT-32) and improvements to Neighborhood Greenway Standards on multiple corridors such as Ash Avenue/100 th Street or Fonner Street/115th Avenue/114th Avenue (Projects AT-8 and AT-16). Goal 12.4 Maintain and improve transportation system safety. FINDING: Goal 1 of the 2040 TSP calls for providing a “safe, comfortable, and connected transportation system for all users.” Policies under Goal 1 intended to support the goal include prioritizing projects that have a safety component for all users that will benefit the community. Project evaluation criteria included a guiding principle to assess a project’s capacity for providing a safe transportation system (see Table 3) Transportation investments for the City were developed and evaluated to address transportation needs based on current and future forecast conditions that included a review and analysis derived from Tigard’s 2019 Transportation Safety Action Plan, which combined data from ODOT, Metro, TriMet, and the City Tigard (see Table 5). The bicycle modal plans in Chapter 4 completed a Level of Traffic Street (LTS) analysis to quantify perceived safety associated with roadways within the City (Figure 7). The LTS analysis helped inform needed multi-modal safety improvements as provided in Chapter 6. Several investment projects identified in the 2040 TSP are intended in large part to improve safety (Tables 10 and 11 and Figure 13). Examples include the addition of high visibility pedestrian crossings on Greenburg Road (Projects S -14 through S-16); adding or improving sidewalk and bike facilities on Hall Boulevard (Projects S-17 through S-21); or completing sidewalk infill at key locations such as along 79th Avenue (Project AT-5), Ash Avenue/100th Street (Project AT-8), and Bull Mountain Road (AT-12). Goal 12.5 Coordinate planning, development, operation, and maintenance of the transportation system with appropriate agencies. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 10 OF 16 CPA2021-0006, DCA2021-0004 FINDING: As has been described previously, development of the 2040 TSP involved close coordination between the City, ODOT, TriMet, Washington County, and other affected stakeholders. Coordination between these stakeholders was accomplished through both the PMT and the TAC. Members of the TAC reviewed technical memoranda throughout the course of the planning process and provided guidance to inform the development of the TSP. In addition, existing state, regional, and local plans, policies, standards, and laws relevant to the TSP were reviewed and evaluated to guide the development of the TSP. The 2040 TSP also includes policies aimed at continuing this coordinated approach to transportation planning, operations , and maintenance, including policies 1.2, 2.3, and 3.1. Goal 12.6 Fund an equitable, balanced, and sustainable tran sportation system that promotes the well-being of the community. FINDING: As noted in the finding to Goal 12.3, the 2040 TSP is a multi-modal plan and includes many proposed improvements that enhance mobility and safety for all road users – including those that choose not to drive or that are unable to drive. The Pedestrian and Bicycle modal plan identifies needs and presents improvements and programs to accommodate and support pedestrian and bicycle travel over the next 20 years. Several of the projects identified in Table 10 identify urban upgrade and active transportation projects that will improve streets to include active transportation facilities, fill gaps in the sidewalk and bicycle lane network, improve crossings for people walking or bike, or construct new facilities such as trails or pathways. In addition, as noted previously, 2040 TSP Goal 3 and its policies focus on “improving quality of life for all, including historically marginalized and underserved communities,” which will serve to direct funding toward the creation of a more equitable, balanced system. CONCLUSION: The applicable Goals of Tigard’s Comprehensive Plan are met. C. METRO CODE 3.08 (Regional Transportation Functional Plan (RTFP)) Title 1 Transportation system design shall ensure that new street construction and re-construction projects are designed to improve safety, support adjacent land uses and balance the needs of all users. FINDING: Title 1 of the RTFP prescribes transportation system design requirements for achieving the vision contained in the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The 2040 TSP plans for a network of interconnected streets using a functional classification system (see Table 5 and Figure 11). The functional classific ation system uses a network of major arterial, arterial, and collector streets adequately spaced to maximize mobility. The 2040 TSP includes a Transit modal plan that identifies the existing and planned transit network in the City (see Chapter 4). The modal plan identifies existing transit facilities, key corridors, and services (Figure 9). The plan also identifies transit needs and a transit network plan necessary to support anticipated growth (Figure 10). Strategies for STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 11 OF 16 CPA2021-0006, DCA2021-0004 Tigard to improve service, reliability, amenities, and access to the transit network are provided in Table 4. The 2040 TSP includes modal plans for pedestrians and bicyclists, respectively. As noted in the finding to Goal 12.3 each modal plan identifies networks for pedestrians and bicyclists (Figure 4 and 8). Each network uses a classification system to identify the desired use of the street. The pedestrian network in the Pedestrian Modal Plan defines the following core elements: Pedestrian Corridors to support higher pedestrian activity; Neighborhood Greenways to create comfortable environments for walking; and trails to support non-motorized mobility. Like the pedestrian network, the bicycle network shares the same Neighborhood Greenway and trail core elements, and also includes a Major Street Bikeway element to support biking in key transportation corridors. The 2040 TSP includes a Freight Modal Plan that considers existing freight conditions and future freight needs (Chapter 4). As noted in the finding to Goal 12.2, the plan recognizes that movement of goods through freight is essential for the City and the region. Figure 12 illustrates freight routes in the City as designated by Tigard, Washington County, and ODOT. The designations inform where improvements may be needed for the safe and efficient movement of trucks and to minimize negative impacts on local streets. The TSP includes a Transportation Demand Management and Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSMO) plan (the plan). The plan defines strategies focused on maximizing the existing transportation system before/prior to major capital expenditures. Strategies that the plan identifies include advanced signal systems, signal retiming and optimization, and real-time traveler information. Title 2 Title 2 provides requirements for the development of and update to local Transportation System Plans. The Title specifies the types of transportation needs and solutions (in priority order) as well as performance targets and standards a TSP must address. FINDING: Chapter 3 of the 2040 TSP provides a summary of technical analysis used to determine transportation needs based on existing c onditions relative to forecast growth using the Washington County Travel Demand Model. The diverse needs of all community members including youth, seniors, people with disabilities, minorities, and low -income families are represented in the identified needs based on technical analysis and through the public engagement program (described in Chapter 2 of the 2040 TSP). The 2040 TSP is consistent with Metro Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) forecasts, system maps, non - SOV modal targets, deficiency thresholds and operation standards, and regional mobility corridors (Tables 1, 3, and 3.6 and Figures 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, and 11). The 2040 TSP also considers the needs of transportation-disadvantaged such as youth, seniors, people with disabilities, and environmental justice populations. The Vision calls for a transportation system that is “accessible, walkable, and healthy for everyone.” Several of the goals focus on achieving that vision through providing a safe, comfortable, and connected transportation system for all users (Goal 1); improving quality of life for all, particularly historically marginalized and underserved communities (Goal 3); and creating livable neighborhoods through improved multimodal, safe connections (Goal 4). Chapter 4 of the STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 12 OF 16 CPA2021-0006, DCA2021-0004 TSP also documents the socioeconomic analysis to evaluate current conditions and identify transportation needs. As noted in the finding to Title 1 above, the 2040 TSP includes modal plans that address the City’s street, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, and freight systems (Ch apter 4). Each modal plan identifies existing conditions (Figures 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, and 12), considers future facility and user needs, and includes designs to accommodate growth over the next 20 years (Figures 4, 8, 10, 11, and 12). The 2040 TSP considers current and future facility and user needs and provides for a range of solutions and to address current and future transportation needs within the community over the next 20 years (Figures 4, 8, 10, 11, and 12). Solutions were identified and prioritized using a framework (Table 4) consistent with RTP implementation priority guidance for: 1. TSMO, TDM, safety, and operational and access management solutions; 2. Transit, bicycle, and pedestrian system improvements; 3. Traffic calming designs and devices; 4. Land use strategies; 5. Connectivity improvements; and 6. Motor vehicle capacity improvements. Coordination of the 2040 TSP solution development with neighboring jurisdictions, agency partners, and roadway and transportation facility owners w as conducted through a combination of TAC meetings, one-on-one meetings, and via electronic communication. Documentation of this coordination is provided in Chapter 2 of the 2040 TSP. The 2040 TSP formally adopts the Metro RTP Interim Regional Mobility Po licy as the performance standard for Tigard roads until such time that a new Regional Mobility Policy is adopted (Policy 1.10 and Table 3.6). Title 3 Title 3 includes provision for the development of transportation projects. Each city is required to specify the general locations and facility parameters of planned regional transportation facilities and improvements. FINDING: The 2040 TSP was prepared consistent with the 2018 RTP, which provides the regional framework for planning and investment. The RTP provides guidance to regional roadways (Highway 217, I-5, Pacific Highway, and several others). There are several projects identified in Chapter 6 where improvements connect with regional facilities that are not under the City’s jurisdiction (Projects S-6, S-9, S-11, AT-11, AT-25, C-1 and C-2 with connections or crossings on Highway 217). The TSP calls for close coordination with regional entities and the continued support of regional policy goals while improving the City’s transportation network. Chapter 6 also identifies other projects for regional facilities that are under the City’s jurisdiction (Projects S -26 through S-30, AT- 7, AT-12, AT-13, AT-17, and AT-20, AT-21, and T-1 through T-3 with improvements on or connected with Pacific Highway) STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 13 OF 16 CPA2021-0006, DCA2021-0004 Title 4 Cities and counties shall establish parking ratios and ensure adequate bicycle parking. FINDING: Chapter 6 of the 2040 TSP includes an investment component for citywide programs for improving the transportation system. One of the identified programs calls on the city to develop a curbside management program to complete a citywide inventory of the City’s curb-space resources and establish parking solutions and broad-based parking policies to maximize the efficiency of parking facilities. Chapter 7 provides an implementation plan that includes several follow -up efforts the City will undertake to fully implement the 2040 TSP. Among these include updates to Title 18, the City’s development code, which includes parking ratios and standards for automobiles and parking. The amendments to Title 18 will be incorporated with other code amendments as part of an omni-bus update effort. In addition, as part of the previous TSP Update process, the City reviewed and address ed parking ratios to ensure consistency with specific parking standards identified in the RTFP . The RTFP parking standards have not changed since that time. CONCLUSION: The applicable Titles of Metro’s Regional Transportation Functional Plan are met. D. OREGON TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE (TPR) (Oregon Administrative Rules 660-012) The purpose of the TPR is “to implement Statewide Planning Goal 12 (Transportation) and promote the development of safe, convenient and economic transportation systems that are designed to reduce reliance on the automobile so that the air pollution, traffic and other livability problems faced by urban areas in other parts of the country might be avoided.” A major purpose of the TPR is to promote more careful coordination of land use and transportation planning, to ensure that planned land uses are supported by and consistent with planned transportation facilities and improvements. FINDING: The 2040 TSP was informed by technical memoranda that document existing and future conditions and includes a roadway classification system, recommended improvements by mode, programmatic solutions to enhance existing facilities, and a general funding plan as required by Section -0020 of the TPR. The previously adopted TSP was acknowledged by the Department of Land Conservation and Development and found to be in compliance with the TPR. The 2040 TSP is an update of the acknowledged TSP. Section -0045 of the TPR requires that local jurisdictions amend their land user regulation to implement the TSP. Elements of the 2040 TSP are implemented through the requirements of the City of Tigard Community Development Code (Code). The Code regulates land uses and development within the City and implements the long-range vision of the Comprehensive Plan, of which the TSP is part. The City already is in compliance with a significant majority of the standards found in the TPR as a result of previous Code updates undertaken as a part of earlier TSP updates, including the 2035 TSP. Additional proposed amendments to the Code have been identified and are found in the TSP Technical Appendix. As part of adoption of the 2040 TSP, the Code will be updated to incorporate new street design standards for 72nd Avenue. The remainder of the recommended amendments will be completed through a subsequent planning effort, as part of an omni-bus update to the Code. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 14 OF 16 CPA2021-0006, DCA2021-0004 CONCLUSION: The applicable provisions of the Oregon TPR (OAR 660-012) are met. E. STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS (Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 197) Goal 1 Public Involvement FINDING: Goal 1 requires the City to provide opportunities for the public to participate in all phases of land use decision making. In this case, the City’s Goal 1 obligations are satisfied by compliance with the procedural requirements for a Le gislative Amendment in TCDC Section 18.710.110 and by the extensive community engagement conducted as part of the Transportation System Plan Update Project that are detailed earlier in this report in response to the City’s community involvement goal. The proposal is consistent with this goal. Goal 2 Land Use Planning FINDING: Goal 2 requires local governments to adopt a comprehensive plan and implementing ordinances that are consistent with its plan. The CPA proposal updates the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, providing the City with new goals, policies, and action measures consistent with the TSP 2040. Goal 2 also requires an “adequate factual base” for legislative decisions. The CPA proposal was developed with the help of a consultant team with expertise in multimodal transportation planning. It is supported by the extensive technical analysis completed by this team, including but not limited to existing and future transportation system needs based on 20 years of forecast growth. Finally, Goal 2 requires coordination between local governments and state agencies. The City’s Goal 2 obligations in this regard were satisfied through ongoing coordination with and notices to affected local, regional, and state governmental entities. The proposal is consistent with this goal. Goal 12 Transportation Planning FINDING: Goal 12 requires cities to “provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system” and to “avoid principal reliance upon any one mode of transportation.” There is good access and mobility across the city for automobiles, however there are significant gaps and system deficiencies at locations around the city for people traveling on foot, by bicycle, via transit, or other non-automobile mode. The 2040 TSP and related CPA amendment recommends new planned pedestrian and bicycle networks along with several key connectivity projects to improve mobility options for all transportation system users. The 2040 TSP and related CPA amendment serve to mitigate climate emission impacts of the transportation system while also building climate resiliency and equity in future transportation system investments. The 2040 TSP supports access and mobility needs for jobs, services, education, and recreation over the plan horizon. The proposal is consistent with this goal. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 15 OF 16 CPA2021-0006, DCA2021-0004 CONCLUSION: The applicable provisions of the Oregon Statewide Planning Goals are met. SECTION V. CITY STAFF COMMENTS Planning staff worked closely with other City departments and committees as part of this plannin g effort. As noted in several of the findings, the 2040 TSP was developed with guidance from a TAC, who was responsible for reviewing the technical aspects of the update. Additionally, key staff in the Community Development and Public Works Departments had an opportunity to formally review the proposed 2040 TSP. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS The following agencies/jurisdictions had an opportunity to review the proposed code amendments: Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) Oregon Department of Transportation Metro Tri-Met Washington County City of Beaverton City of King City City of Tualatin Tigard-Tualatin School District Tualatin Hills Parks & Recreation District Washington County responded with several recommended map edits and several clarifying questions by phone. DLCD responded by email with a clarifying question. As of the writing of this report, no other agency comments have been received. SECTION VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS City staff followed the legislative notice requirement in CDC Section 18.710.110. Notice of the proposed 2040 TSP adoption as an ancillary document to the Comprehensive Plan, proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and Development Code Amendment was sent to individuals on the citywide interested parties list. Notice was also published in the Tigard Times and on the city’s website. Additional public outreach was conducted as part of the 2040 TSP Update Project. Further details are provided earlier in this report in the findings for Comp rehensive Plan Goal 1 (Community Involvement). As of the writing of this report, no public comments have been received. STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 16 OF 16 CPA2021-0006, DCA2021-0004 SECTION VIII. CONCLUSION The proposed 2040 TSP, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and Development Code Amendment meet all applicable provisions of the Tigard Community Development Code, Tigard Comprehensive Plan, Metro Regional Transportation Functional Plan, and Oregon Statewide Planning Goals. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the 2040 Transportation System Plan as an ancillary document to the Comprehensive Plan and recommend approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to the Tigard City Council as provided by the public hearing process. November 29, 2021 PREPARED BY: Dave Roth DATE Senior Planner November 29, 2021 APPROVED BY: Tom McGuire DATE Assistant Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS 1. Proposed Tigard Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 2. Proposed TCDC Chapter 18.660 Text Amendment 3. Draft Final 2040 Transportation System Plan Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 1 Chapter 12: Transportation “To provide and encourage a safe, convenient, and economic transportation system.” ADOPTED AMENDMENTS Effective Date CPA# Changes 07-22-09 2009-00002 Goal 12.1, Policy 2.C, Ordinance 09-09 12-23-10 2010-00001 Entire Chapter updated by Ord. 10-18 XX-XX-22 XXXX Entire Chapter updated by Ord. 21-XX An important tool for a community to use when preparing for future growth is a long range transportation plan. It acts as the principal document for staff, decision makers, and the public to identify the function, capacity, and location of future facilities, direct resources to transportation projects, and provide the community with the level of investment that will be needed to support anticipated development within the community. The goals and policies contained in Tigard’s this chapter Transportation System Plan were developed to guide the long range planning, development, and management of the City’s transportation system. They incorporate and build upon previous transportation goals and policies and prior plans adopted by the City. They also integrate regional and statewide planning rules and policy, including the requirement for a multi-modal, balanced approach to transportation policy. Coordination with the City’s regional partners is particularly important to the successful implementation of these policies. GOAL 12: Transportation: “To provide and encourage a safe, convenient, and economi c transportation system.” The 2035 2040 Tigard Transportation System Plan (2035 2040 TSP), an update of the previously adopted plan, was initiated in 2008 2020 and completed in 2010 2021. The completion of the 2035 TSP satisfies the requirements for Goal 12 and is timely for two reasons. First, traffic congestion has consistently ranked as the number one issue facing Tigard in community attitude surveys and the City is committed to finding solutions to this issue. Secondly, the community has developed a vision for Tigard’s future and a key component of this vision is developing an efficient and balanced multi -modal transportation system. The 2040 TSP responds to a new strategic vision for Tigard’s future, which emphasizes developing a multi-modal transportation system that is safe, walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. It serves as a long-range planning tool for Tigard to ensure its transportation system can meet community needs. The 2035 2040 TSP supports that vision, addresses community needs, communicates the City’s aspirations, and conforms to state and regional policies. The Oregon Revised Statutes require that the transportation plan be based on the current Comprehensive Plan land uses and that it provide for a transportation system that accommodates the Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 2 expected growth in population and employment that will result from implementation of the land use plan. Development of the 2035 2040 TSP was guided by Oregon Revised Statute 197.712, and the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) contained in Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012, and the state TSP Guidelines prepared by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The TPR requires that alternative travel modes be given consideration along with the automobile, and that reasonable effort be applied to the development and enhancement of the alternative modes in providing the future transportation system. In addition, the TPR requires that local jurisdictions adopt land use and subdivision ordinance amendments to protect transportation facilities and to provide bicycle and pedestrian facilities between residential, commercial, and employment/ institutional areas. It is further required that local communities coordinate their respective plans with the applicable county, regional, and state transportation plans. Additional requirements were adopted by the Oregon Legislature in 2009 in Oregon House Bill 2001— Jobs & Transportation Act (JTA). Among the chief changes introduced in JTA is an emphasis on sustainability. JTA requires the development of a least cost planning model, as well as planning for reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Precise implementation measures and evaluation technologies are still under development. However, these elements were integrated in concept in the 2035 TSP. The 2035 2040 TSP was also prepared consistent with the Portland Metro 2035 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and the Climate Smart Strategy adopted by Metro Council. The RTP provides a regional framework for transportation planning and investment, including implementation of Metro’s 2040 Growth Concept. The Climate Smart Strategy, adopted in 2014, provides guidance for reducing per capita greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from cars and small trucks. The 20352040 TSP has been developed in close coordination with the RTP in order to ensure consistency at the state and regional levels. Over the past thirty years, the transportation sector has, on average, accounted for nearly forty percent of Oregon’s overall share of GHG emissions. A significant portion of transportation sector GHG emissions can be attributed to the widespread use of cars and light trucks for everyday travel. Tigard’s 2040 TSP seeks to pair strategic transportation investments with planned growth to reduce GHG emissions by advancing programs and projects designed to reduce dependency on automobile travel. A community’s transportation system and infrastructure are the cumulative result of hundreds upon hundreds of decisions made over time. Each decision results in benefits and costs borne by roadway users and the community. Foundational to the 2040 TSP is the concept of Complete Streets; a philosophy that promotes a more equitable distribution of these benefits and costs. The 2040 TSP envisions a vibrant and healthy community where people of all ages and abilities can safely, efficiently, and comfortably travel on a well-connected and optimized multi-modal network of roads, trails, and paths. Additionally, tTransportation planning in Tigard is shaped by opportunities and constraints as much as by transportation needs. Historic gGrowth within Tigard and the surrounding area has increaseds travel demand and associated congestion, while the built environment also has madekes major roadway expansions costly or infeasible to construct. At the same time that these costs rise,With significant Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 3 competition is high for scarce transportation funding resources, the 2040 TSP recommends strategic programs and projects that support current and projected future growth within the community. There is also a greater awareness of the negative impacts that come from creating an environment geared toward reliance on personal automobile travel. There is growing concern about greenhouse gas emissions as well as dependency on foreign oil and rising fuel costs. Reliance on automobile travel instead of active transportation, such as walking and cycling, is also one culprit in the rise of obesity, including among children. While there are myriad strategies to combat these issues, a critical role for transportation is the provision of a balanced, multi-modal transportation system. These challenges— climate mitigation and adaptation, equity considerations, public health, the existing built environment, high costs, and limited funding, environmental impacts, and personal health issues— were significant in shaping the 2035 2040 TSP. At the same time, they helped direct the plan toward opportunities to integrate Tigard’s transportation system with regional and state investment plans; to promote land use patterns that support those investments; to minimize impacts to the local community; and, to provide Tigard residents with a range of options for personal, recreational, and commute travel. KEY FINDINGS • The City’s Transportation System Plan must comply with the Transportation Planning Rule (Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012) and Metro’s Urban Growth Management Functional Plan. • Transportation System Management (TSM) can be an effective way to improve existing street function rather than adding travel lanes. • Motor vehicle travel is now, and will continue to be, the primary mode of travel in the community, but creating better opportunities for alternative modes is essential to an effective future transportation system. • Compact development, transit access, and local circulation are important to support investments in high capacityhigh-capacity transit service and result in shorter trips and more walking. • Connectivity in Tigard is challenged because of Hwy. 217, Interstate 5, the railroad, natural features, and dead enddead-end streets. • Improving connectivity will maximize the investment in the existing transportation system. • Current development patterns result in highly directional travel demand. • Land use patterns that shorten home-to-work trips, support transit, and make walk/bike trips more viable can help reduce congestion. • Transportation challenges have a direct affect upon A balanced transportation system capable of safely moving people and goods is essential to support the development potential of the Tigard Triangle, Downtown, and the Washington Square Regional Center. • State owned highways provide critical access to Tigard, but congestion contributes to neighborhood cut through traffic. • Limited east-west connections mean widening the existing routes could improve traffic flow, but such improvements must be balanced with the benefits of local traffic and impacts borne by the local community. • The City has a long-standing goal of directing a significant portion of future housing and employment growth in three key areas. Adopted plans support this targeted growth and increased density in Downtown Tigard, the Tigard Triangle, and the Washington Square Regional Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 4 Center. Plans for these areas area designed to create complete communities that are walkable, provide multi-modal transportation options, and provide many jobs, service, and a range of housing options; all of which will reduce the need for travel for commuting, shopping, and recreation. • High comfort and low-stress bicycle and pedestrian facilities are vital to developing a fully functioning network that accommodates people of all ages and abilities. • Transit service provides an alternative to private automobile travel for distances too far to walk or bike. • Funding is limited and transportation improvements require strategic investment to maximize the value for all people who use the transportation system. GOALS AND POLICIES The adopted 2040 Transportation System Plan is a special-function Plan concerned with Goal 12 requirements and contains the City’s Goals and Policies that advances the strategic vision to be an equitable community that is accessible, walkable, and healthy for everyone. Overarching goals include the following: 1. Provide a safe, comfortable, and connected transportation system for all users, especially pedestrians and other vulnerable users. 2. Support environmental and community health by reducing our carbon footprint, minimizing impacts to natural resources, and addressing unequal health impacts/outcomes of our transportation system on low-income communities and communities of color. 3. Improve quality of life for all, particularly historically marginalized and underserved communities, by providing access to jobs, schools, and essential services with conveni ent and affordable travel options. 4. Create livable neighborhoods that are designed to improve multimodal connections while discouraging unsafe interactions. 5. Support economic vibrancy by accommodating the movement of people and goods and creating equitable opportunities for economic development throughout Tigard. 6. Make the most of transportation resources by leveraging funding opportunities, not overbuilding our system, and making investments that reduce ongoing system maintenance and preservation costs. See Chapter 3 of the 2040 TSP for the complete set of the City’s transportation goals and policies. GOAL: 12.1 Develop mutually supportive land use and transportation plans to enhance the livability of the community. POLICIES: 1. The City shall plan for a transportation system that meets current community needs and anticipated growth and development. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 5 2. The City shall prioritize transportation projects according to community benefit, such as safety, performance, and accessibility, as well as the associated costs and impacts. 3. The City shall maintain and enhance transportation functionality by emphasizing multi -modal travel options for all types of land uses. 4. The City shall promote land uses and transportation investments that promote balanced transportation options. 5. The City shall develop plans for major transportation corridors and provide appropriate land uses in and adjacent to those corridors. 6. The City shall support land use patterns that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and preserve the function of the transportation system. 7. The City shall strive to protect the natural environment from impacts derived from transportation facilities. 8. The City shall mitigate impacts to the natural environment associated with proposed transportation construction or reconstruction projects. 9. The City shall coordinate with private and public developers to provide access via a safe, efficient, and balanced transportation system. 10. The City shall require all development to meet adopted transportation standards or provide appropriate mitigations. RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES: i. Create commercial nodes within residential neighborhoods to provide residents with opportunities to walk or bike for non- commute travel purposes. ii. Encourage non-auto-dependent development with mixed uses and higher densities in targeted areas, such as along Pacific Highway, in the Downtown, and in the Washington Square Regional Center. iii. Review and update development code requirements for on-site motor vehicle parking. iv. Review and update development design guidelines to promote pedestrian-friendly commercial areas. v. Identify, evaluate and adopt City of Tigard performance standards that promote safe and efficient access and mobility for walk, bike and transit modes as well as personal automobile travel. vi. Work with State and Regional partners to identify and evaluate multi-modal mobility/performance standards for major transportation facilities. GOAL: 12.2 Develop and maintain a transportation system for the efficient movement of people and goods. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 6 POLICIES: 1. The City shall adopt and maintain transportation performance measures. 2. The City shall manage the transportation system to support desired economic development activities. 3. The City shall design streets to encourage a reduction in trip length by improving arterial, collector, and local street connections. 4. The City shall design arterial routes, highway access, and adjacent land uses in ways that facilitate the efficient movement of people, goods and services. 5. The City shall cooperate with the railroads in facilitating and preserving rail freight service to existing and future businesses that depend on railroad service. 6. The City shall develop and maintain an efficient arterial grid system that provides access within the City, and serves through traffic in the City. 7. The City shall use strategies for access management, including the support of modifications that bring access points into compliance or closer to compliance with applicable standards. 8. The City recognizes freight movement as being a priority of the transportation system. 9. The City shall require the provision of appropriate parking in balance with other transportation modes. 10. The City shall strive to increase non-single occupant vehicle mode shares through vehicle trip reduction strategies, such as those outlined in the Regional Transportation Plan. 11. The City shall design the transportation system to provide connectivity between Metro designated centers, corridors, employment and industrial areas. RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES i. Conduct a citywide connectivity and circulation study to identify potential circulation improvements for street systems serving Tigard. ii. Create a comprehensive inventory of street stubs, unimproved right-of-way, and other potential future roadway connections to inform long range planning and development review. iii. Review and update/clarify, as warranted, development code requirements for new roadway or pedestrian/bicycle connections as part of land development. GOAL: 12.3 Provide an accessible, multi-modal transportation system that meets the mobility needs of the community. POLICIES: 1. The City shall continue to support the existing commuter rail and bus service in Tigard and will seek opportunities for increased service frequency and passenger convenience. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 7 2. The City shall engage with regional partners to support development of High Capacity Transit serving the Tigard. 3. The City shall design and construct transportation facilities to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 4. The City shall support and prioritize bicycle, pedestrian, and transit improvements for transportation disadvantaged populations who may be dependent on travel modes other than private automobile. 5. The City shall develop and maintain neighborhood and local connections to provide efficient circulation in and out of the neighborhoods. 6. The City shall require development adjacent to transit routes to provide direct pedestrian accessibility. 7. The City shall develop and implement public street standards that recognize the multi -purpose nature of the street right-of-way. 8. The City shall design all projects on Tigard city streets to encourage pedestrian and bicycle travel. 9. The City shall require sidewalks to be constructed in conjunction with private development and consistent with adopted plans. 10. The City shall require and/or facilitate the construction of off-street trails to develop pedestrian and bicycle connections that cannot be provided by a street. 11. The City shall require appropriate access to bicycle and pedestrian facilities for all schools, parks, public facilities, and commercial areas. RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES i. Develop parking management plans for Downtown, Tigard Triangle, Washington Square Regional Center, and other areas to support economic development and a balanced transportation system. ii. Identify and adopt mode split targets that achieve and exceed Metro targets for regional centers, town centers, and downtown Tigard. iii. Review and update, as warranted, street design standards to ensure that public right of way is planned, designed, and constructed to provide safe and comfortable facilities for all travel modes and adequate drainage and treatment for storm water. iv. Create a more complete network of pedestrian facilities by identifying and prioritizing gaps within the current sidewalk and trail system. v. Develop pedestrian and bicycle corridors to neighborhoods, schools, parks, recreation users, activity centers and transit stops. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 8 vi. Prioritize transit, pedestrian, and bicycle investments in areas serving a high proportion of disadvantaged or transit dependent communities. vii. Fill in gaps in the bicycle network to provide for greater citywide bicycle mobility. viii. Develop bicycle routes that connect neighborhoods, schools, parks, recreation users, and activity centers. ix. Develop a bicycle signage program to help cyclists find routes on relatively level terrain with low traffic volumes. x. Engage with regional planners and service providers to support transit as a travel option with increased frequency and better connections for buses, high capacity transit, and WES commuter rail. xi. Improve the comfort, convenience, and safety for transit users through bus shelters, seating, signage, and other bus stop/ station features. xii. Provide local transit connector service linking residential neighborhoods with transit stations/stops, employment and retail centers, schools, and recreational areas. xiii. Work with Metro and other regional partners to advance High Capacity Transit in the Pacific Highway-99W/Barbur Boulevard corridor. xiv. Start a dialogue with regional transit providers to accommodate cross-service passes to facilitate ease of ridership. GOAL: 12.4 Maintain and improve transportation system safety. POLICIES: 1. The City shall consider the intended uses of a street during the design to promote safety, efficiency, and multi-modal needs. 2. The City shall coordinate with appropriate agencies to provide safe, secure, connected, and desirable pedestrian, bicycle, and public transit facilities. 3. The City shall require new development to provide safe access for all modes to and from a publicly dedicated street. 4. The City shall develop access management strategies for arterial and collector streets to improve safety in the community. 5. The City shall prioritize intersection improvements to address safety deficiencies. 6. The City shall include safety mitigation as a priority criterion in making transportation investments. 7. The City shall enhance and maintain a neighborhood traffic management program to address issues of excessive speeding and through traffic on local residential streets. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 9 8. The City shall require safe routing of hazardous materials consistent with federal and state guidelines. 9. The City shall require new transportation facilities to meet adopted lighting standards. RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES i. Review high crash locations, including state and county data, and develop a system for evaluating and prioritizing safety mitigations. ii. Continue to implement neighborhood traffic management techniques to promote safety and livability in residential neighborhoods. iii. Improve pedestrian crossing treatments at high traffic volume streets and/or locations with high levels of pedestrian demand (e.g., schools, retail centers, transit stops, etc.) GOAL: 12.5 Coordinate planning, development, operation, and maintenance of the transportation system with appropriate agencies. POLICIES: 1. The City shall coordinate and cooperate with adjacent agencies and service providers—including Metro, TriMet, ODOT, Washington County, and neighboring cities—when appropriate, to develop transportation projects which benefit the region as a whole, in addition to the City of Tigard. 2. The City shall collaborate with other transportation providers to develop, operate, and maintain intelligent transportation systems, including coordination of traffic signals. 3. The City shall coordinate with TriMet, and/or any other transit providers serving Tigard, to improve transit service to, from, through, and within Tigard. RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES i. Partner with Regional and County transportation planning organizations to leverage statewide and federal transportation funding for local projects. ii. Work with regional and state partners to mitigate negative impacts to Tigard from high traffic volumes traveling through Tigard on state facilities, including capacity enhancements on Highway 217 and Interstate 5. iii. Work with state and regional partners to develop alternative mobility standards in order to accommodate desired land development changes. iv. Prior to implementation of projects associated with the Highway 99W Corridor Plan, especially those requiring additional right-of-way or affecting property access, there shall be established protocols whereby affected property owners or businesses are made aware of pending improvements. Those that might be affected shall be informed and asked to be involved in the project development process as early as possible. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 10 v. The City of Tigard shall state a position that alignment of the proposed I -5/Hwy 99W Connector be established as one which reduces through traffic and freight movement on Highway 99W to the greatest extent possible; and that the City shall support this position and otherwise participate in the project as an active member of the I-5/99W Connector Steering Committee. vi. As part of the transportation management, planning and design process, the livability benefits of future Highway 99W improvements shall be publicly discussed and evaluated. vii. The City shall adopt Alternative B as contained in the Tigard 99W Plan as part of its Transportation System Plan and prioritize its recommendations. Subsequently, the City shall, in conjunction with other agencies, jurisdictions, and stakeholders, develop action plans to implement the alternative’s specific project recommendations. Action plans to implement Alternative B shall include design and engineering strategies, funding measures, and stakeholder and citizen engagement. Reasonable time frames shall be associated with the action plans. viii. Other transportation and land development projects within the vicinity of Highway 99W shall be evaluated to determine potential negative or positive impacts on the facility. Negative impacts shall be avoided or mitigated. Furthermore, it is important that solutions to Highway 99W problems be evaluated to assess impacts on other streets, and that negative impacts in these circumstances are avoided or mitigated and positive impacts promoted. ix. A land use planning effort shall be a priority for future City/ state efforts to recreate the Highway 99W corridor. In particular, coordinated land use and transportation planning is essential to promote transit as a viable transportation option. x. The City should be imaginative and “think outside the box” with the purpose of creating a safe, attractive, transit oriented, and vibrant urban corridor along Highway 99W. When there are obvious benefits to specific physical improvements, the City should request design exceptions from ODOT. xi. In the near term, the City and ODOT shall develop an Access Management Plan for Highway 99W. Each property identified as needing access management treatment shall be treated as unique. A one-size fits all approach should not be used. The economic vitality of businesses is important. xii. Implementing improved transit service should be an ongoing priority with the long -term objective of light rail service along the Highway 99W corridor. If light rail is not possible within the reasonable future, then improved bus service/rubber tired vehicles shall serve as an alternative until it is. xiii. Highway 99W Action Plans shall seek to enhance the economic vitality of the corridor through transportation, aesthetic land use, and other improvements. In addition, resources shall be used to coordinate business development and retention activities, and aid in communication among the business community and city government. GOAL: 12.6 Fund an equitable, balanced, and sustainable transportation system that promotes the well - being of the community. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 11 POLICIES: 1. The City shall make street maintenance a funding priority. 2. The City shall seek to invest in capital projects that leverage other infrastructure investments. 3. The City shall seek opportunities for transportation investments that support transportation goals of efficiency, multi-modal access, and safety. RECOMMENDED ACTION MEASURES i. Periodically review and revise transportation system development charges to ensure the cost of development is appropriately covered.. ii. Periodically review and evaluate the street maintenance fee to ensure the most appropriate and equitable calculations are being used. iii. Continue to seek grant monies to plan for and develop multi- modal infrastructure improvements. iv. Continue to submit project proposals for regional, state, and federal transportation monies to implement the Tigard 2035 TSP. Proposed Code Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 PC Draft (12/6/2021) Page 1 of 13 Text shown in bold, italic, and underlined is proposed to be added. Text shown in strikethrough is proposed to be removed. Chapter 18.660 TIGARD TRIANGLE PLAN DISTRICT Sections: 18.660.010 Purpose 18.660.020 Applicability 18.660.030 General Provisions 18.660.040 Approval Process 18.660.050 Pre-Existing Development and Approvals 18.660.060 Land Use Standards 18.660.070 Site Design Standards 18.660.080 Building Design Standards 18.660.090 Transportation Facility Standards 18.660.100 Sign Standards 18.660.070 Site Design Standards C. Utilities and service areas. 1. Above-ground private utilities proposed to serve a single development, such as transformers and control valves, that are 1 cubic foot or greater in volume or have any one dimension greater than 2 feet must be located on the site with the proposed development, and: a. Located inside a building; b. Located no closer to the street property line than the street -facing façade of the nearest building on site and painted or wrapped with a non-reflective material that is dark in color; or c. Screened as required by Paragraph 18.660.070.F.4 where not screened by a building. Landscaped stormwater facilities are exempt from this standard, and wireless communication facilities are subject to the standards and procedures in Chapter 18.450, Wireless Communication Facilities. 2. Service areas, such as those that contain waste and recycling containers, outdoor storage, and mechanical equipment, must be screened as required by Paragraph 18.660.070.F.4 where not screened by a building. Roof-top mechanical equipment is exempt from this standard. Vehicle parking and loading areas are subject to the standards in Subsection 18.660.070.D. 3. Landscaped stormwater facilities and roof-top mechanical equipment are exempt from these standards. Vehicle parking and loading areas are subject to the standards in Subsection 18.660.070.D. Wireless communication facilities are subject to the standards and procedures in Chapter 18.450, Wireless Communication Facilities. Proposed Code Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 PC Draft (12/6/2021) Page 2 of 13 E. Public bicycle parking. 1. Quantity. The minimum quantity standard for public bicycle parking is provided in Table 18.660.5. There is no maximum quantity standard for public bicycle parking. Public bicycle parking is defined as bicycle racks or lockers that are available for use by members of the public, including but not limited to visitors, employees, and residents. 2. Size and design. Public bicycle parking spaces must be a minimum of 2 feet in width and 6 feet in length. All public bicycle racks must be designed to allow a bicycle frame to lock to it at 2 points of contact. Table 18.660.5 Minimum Number of Public Bicycle Parking Spaces Proposed Development Minimum Number of Spaces Residential development that is not mixed-use and has more than 4 units. 1 space per 30 linear feet of street frontage or any portion thereof Non-residential and mixed-use developments. 1 space per 20 linear feet of street frontage or any portion thereof 2. Design. All bicycle parking must meet the following standards. a. Bicycle racks must be designed to allow a bicycle frame to lock to it at 2 points of contact, except that spiral racks and wave racks with more than one loop are prohibited; b. Bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground; c. Bicycle parking spaces must be at least 2.5 feet in width and 6 feet in length and have an access aisle between each row of spaces that is at least 5 feet in width. Covered bicycle parking must provide a vertical clearance of 7 feet; and d. Bicycle parking spaces must be paved with a dust-free hard surface material. 3. Location. Public bicycle parking spaces must be visible to pedestrians on the sidewalk in front of the proposed development. They must be located in front of or to the side of the building. They may be located in the public right-of-way with approval by the City Engineer. Bicycle parking must not conflict with the use and maintenance of any utilities, service areas, off-street vehicle parking and loading areas, driveways, or transportation facilities. F. Retaining walls, fences, and street screens. 1. The maximum height of retaining walls is 4 feet where located within 12 feet of any street property line. 2. Fences and walls along street and interior property lines are allowed but not required. The maximum height of fences and walls is 3 feet where located within 12 feet of any street property line. 3. Chain link fencing and unfinished concrete blocks with any one dimension equal to or greater than 15 inches are prohibited within 12 feet of any street property line. Proposed Code Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 PC Draft (12/6/2021) Page 3 of 13 4. Street screens are required to screen off-street parking and loading areas, service areas, and some utilities from the street. Utilities and service areas include, but are not limited to, waste and recycling areas, transformers, utility vaults, and mechanical equipment. Street screens must meet the following standards: ac. Location. A street screen must be located within 5 feet of the area to be screened, except on sites sloping down from the street. A street screen on downward sloping sites must be located as far from the street property line as possible so that the area to be screened is not visible to pedestrians on the sidewalk in front of the proposed development. A line of sight analysis is required in these circumstances. A street screen is not required where it would obstruct vehicle or pedestrian access. b. Height. If the area to be screened is an off-street parking area, the street screen must be between 4 and 6 feet in height. If the area to be screened is an off-street loading area, service area, or utility, the street screen must be between 4 and 8 feet in height. cd. Length. The maximum length of a street screen is 12 feet where located along, and within 35 feet of, any street property line. This standard does not apply to street screens meeting the standard in Subparagraph 18.660.070.F.4.a. da. Materials. The street screen must be a wall, fence, or combination thereof. It must be opaque and permanent and located within 5 feet of the area to be screened. Chain link fencing and unfinished concrete blocks are is prohibited. G. Driveways. 1. Quantity. Driveways on all streets are subject to the standards in Table 18.660.6, except for driveways on Dartmouth Street, 72nd Avenue, and Pacific Highway. Driveways on these streets are subject to the access management standards in Chapter 18.920, Access, Egress, and Circulation. Table 18.660.6 Maximum Number of Driveways Street Development Site Length of Street Frontage Maximum Number of Driveways 72nd Ave Not applicable 1 per street frontage, except where a second driveway is required by Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue for emergency access. If a second driveway is required, it must be: • Shared with an adjacent development subject to 18.660.070.G.5, or • Gated and limited to emergency vehicle access only. All Other Streets For each street frontage less than or equal to 300 feet in length 1 per street frontage For each street frontage more than 300 feet in length 1 per every 200 feet of street frontage Proposed Code Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 PC Draft (12/6/2021) Page 4 of 13 2. Size. Driveways for all nonresidential uses, mixed-use buildings with residential and nonresidential uses, and apartment buildings with residential uses, other than rowhouses and single detached houses, must be 20 feet or less in width on all streets, except for driveways on Dartmouth Street, 72nd Avenue, and Pacific Highway. Driveways on these streets must only be as wide as needed for safety and are subject to the access management standards in Subsection 18.920.030.H. Driveways for all other residential uses rowhouses and single detached houses must be 10 feet or less in width. Driveway width measurements do not include driveway wings. 3. Location. Driveways must be located as far apart from each other as practicable except where shared. Driveways near street intersections must be located as far from the intersection as practicable. Driveways must notare not allowed to be located in the influence area of any intersection with Dartmouth Street, 72nd Avenue, or Pacific Highway and are subject to the access management standards in Subsection 18.920.030.H. 4. Sight distance. Driveways must have adequate sight distance for safety. A sight distance analysis is required for proposed driveways or existing driveways on sites where development is proposed. The City Engineer will specify the technical information that must be included in the analysis. 5. Shared access. Shared access is required along 72nd Avenue for certain types of residential development to prevent a series of closely-spaced driveways. Development that includes a single detached dwelling unit or two attached dwelling units is prohibited from using a single driveway to access 72nd Avenue. Shared driveways access between adjacent residential or nonresidential developments may also be required where practicable. Where required, they shared access must be maintained into perpetuity with a recorded joint access agreement, contract, or other legally binding document. H. District trees. 1. District trees are Oregon white oaks located throughout the TMU zone adjacent to existing and future public rights-of-way as shown on the Tigard Triangle District Tree Inventory and Map. Oregon white oaks in public rights-of-way are regulated as street trees and are subject to the provisions in Subparagraph 18.660.090.C.4.c18.660.090.C.4.b. 18.660.080 Building Design Standards C. Building entrances. Building entrances must be located on street-facing building facades as follows: 4. Weather protection. A required building entrance must be covered, recessed, or treated with a permanent architectural feature that provides weather protection for pedestrians. The required weather protection must be at least as wide as the entrance, a maximum of 6 feet above the top of the entrance, and a minimum of 3 feet in depth. The required weather protection may project into the minimum building setback and public right-of-way as allowed by Paragraph 18.660.080.D.318.660.080.D.2. Weather protection standards are shown in Figures 18.660.3 and 18.660.4. E. Building facade windows. Building facade windows are required as follows: 1. Windows are required on all street-facing facades within 35 feet of any street property line and are subject to the window area standards in Table 18.660.8 and as shown in Figure 18.660.4. Any portion of a street-facing facade that contains vehicle parking, such as a parking structure, does not have to provide windows but must provide facade openings that meet the minimum required Proposed Code Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 PC Draft (12/6/2021) Page 5 of 13 window area in Table 18.660.8. If required facade openings contain glass, they must meet the standards in Paragraph 18.660.080.E.3. If required facade openings do not contain glass, they may contain architectural elements that are no more than 30 percent sight-obscuring. 2. Window area is the aggregate area of the glass within each window, including any interior grids, mullions, or transoms. Facade area is the aggregate area of each street-facing vertical wall plane. 3. Required windows must be clear glass and not mirrored, frosted, or reflective. Clear glass within doors may be counted toward meeting the window coverage standard. Table 18.660.8 Minimum Window Area Type of Story and Use Use Minimum Window Area First Story: Mixed-Use and Nonresidential Upper Stories: Mixed-Use and Nonresidential Nonresidential 50% of facade Residential 30% of facade First Story: Residential Only Upper Stories: Residential Only (Does not apply to stories with sloped roofs or dormers) Nonresidential 30% of facade Residential 1520% of façade (not applicable to stories with sloped roofs or dormers) Figure 18.660.4 Window Area and Weather Protection Standards Proposed Code Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 PC Draft (12/6/2021) Page 6 of 13 18.660.090 Transportation Facility Standards C. Transportation facility standards. 1. General standards. b. Right-of-way must be dedicated to the public for transportation purposes in accordance with the standards in this chapter. i. Additional right-of-way dedication may be required at intersections for needed improvements identified by a transportation impact study or applicable road authority. Where practicable or required, such as along 72nd Avenue, right-of-way provided for parking lanes may be used for intersection operational needs in lieu of additional right-of-way subject to approval by the City Engineer. ii. Additional right-of-way dedication or public easements may be required to address slope or drainage issues as determined by the City Engineer in addition to the maximum right-of-way widths required in Tables 18.660.9 – 10. 3. Transportation network connectivity. c. Bicycle and pedestrian connections are required where the addition of a connection would link the end of a permanent turnaround to an adjacent street or provide a midblock connection through a long block. A midblock connection is required where at least one block face is 800 feet or more in length. A required connection must go through the interior of the block and connect the block face that is 800 feet or more in length to its opposite block face. Bicycle and pedestrian connections include off-street trails and paths as described in Subsection 18.660.090.C.4.e18.660.090.C.4.d. 4. Transportation facility design. a. Street design. All streets are subject to the standards in Table 18.660.9 and as shown in Figure 18.660.5, except for Dartmouth Street, 72nd Avenue, Pacific Highway, and the future business access street parallel to Pacific Highway that connects the western portion of Atlanta Street to the future 74th Avenue. i. 72nd Avenue is subject to the standards in Subparagraph 18.660.090.C.4.b. ii. Dartmouth Street, 72nd Avenue, and Pacific Highway are subject to the standards in Subsection 18.910.030.E. iii. The future business access street is subject to the standards in Subsection 18.910.030.E, specifically the local street standard shown in Figure 18.910.6.A. Table 18.660.9 Street Elements and Widths Street Element Width Notes Maximum Right-of-Way (without bike lanes) 64′ Any turn lanes required by the City Engineer must be accommodated in the on-street parking lane. Proposed Code Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 PC Draft (12/6/2021) Page 7 of 13 Maximum Right-of-Way (with bike lanes) 70′ – 76′ Any turn lanes required by the City Engineer must be accommodated in the on-street parking lane. Bike lanes are required on specific streets. See Map 18.660.B for bike lane locations. Bike lanes are 6′ in width and usually, but not always, located on both sides of the street. Vehicle Lane 10′ One travel lane in each direction is required. The need for a center lane is determined by the City Engineer. On-Street Parking Lane 8′ Parking on both sides of the street is required along the full length of each block face unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer for access, sight distance, stormwater facilities, bus stops, right turn lanes, or other need as identified by the City Engineer. Sidewalk Corridor 14′ Sidewalk corridors are required on both sides of the street. Each corridor must include a sidewalk, landscape strip or tree well, and a 6″ curb. • Minimum sidewalk width is 6′ • Minimum landscape strip width is 5′ • Minimum tree well dimensions are 5′ x 14′ Landscape strips and tree wells may be designed as stormwater facilities. See below for additional standards on street trees and stormwater facilities. Curb extensions must be included at all intersections where dedicated on-street parking lanes are provided. Figure 18.660.5 Street Elements and Widths Proposed Code Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 PC Draft (12/6/2021) Page 8 of 13 b. 72nd Avenue street design. 72nd Avenue is subject to the standards below, in Table 18.660.10, and as shown in Figures 18.660.6A - E. i. Sidewalks must have a minimum width of 9 feet when not adjacent to a bus stop. This minimum width includes a 1-foot-wide buffer on the side abutting the bike lane. Sidewalks must have a minimum width of 6 feet when adjacent to a bus stop. ii. Landscape corridors must have a minimum width of 5 feet and include the required number of street trees in a continuous landscape strip or tree wells. If tree wells are provided, minimum dimensions are 5′ x 14′. Landscape strips and tree wells may be designed as stormwater facilities. See below for additional standards on street trees and stormwater facilities. iii. Bus stops located in landscape corridors or parking lanes must have a minimum width of 8 feet. iv. Parking lanes must be provided along the full length of each block face where required, except where otherwise approved for mid-block crossings, private property access, sight distance, stormwater facilities, bus stops, or other needs identified by the City Engineer. Any right turn lanes required by the City Engineer must be accommodated in the on-street parking lane. v. Curb extensions must be included at all intersections where dedicated on-street parking lanes are provided, except where they would interfere with bus movements. vi. A reduced right-of-way width with minimal street elements is required where 72nd Avenue crosses Red Rock Creek to minimize natural resource impacts. The maximum right-of-way width is 54 feet through this sensitive lands area. The cross section includes two travel lanes and sidewalks and bike lanes on both sides of the street. Table 18.660.10 72nd Avenue Street Elements and Widths Pacific Highway to Red Rock Creek (Figure 18.660.6A) Street Element Width Notes Maximum Right-of-Way 62’ See 18.660.090.C.4.b.vi for reduced right-of-way width over Red Rock Creek. Vehicle Lane 10’ One travel lane in each direction is required. No center turn lane is required. Sidewalk 6’ – 9’ See 18.660.090.C.4.b.i. Bike Lane 6’ Landscape/Bus Stop Corridor 5’ – 8’ See 18.660.090.C.4.b.ii and iii. Red Rock Creek to Dartmouth Street (Figure 18.660.6B) Street Element Width Notes Maximum Right-of-Way 90’ – 94’ See 18.660.090.C.4.b.vi for reduced right-of way-width over Red Rock Creek. Proposed Code Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 PC Draft (12/6/2021) Page 9 of 13 An additional 4’ of right-of-way is required to accommodate bus pull-outs in parking lanes at bus stop locations only. Vehicle Lane 11’ – 12’ One 11’ travel lane in each direction and a continuous 12’ center turn lane are required. Sidewalk 6’ – 9’ See 18.660.090.C.4.b.i. Bike Lane 6’ Landscape/Bus Stop Corridor 5’ – 8’ See 18.660.090.C.4.b.ii and iii. Parking Lane 8’ – 10’ See 18.660.090.C.4.b.iv and v. Parking lanes on both sides of the street are required. Parking lanes must be widened to 10’ to accommodate bus pull-outs where bus stops are provided or required. Dartmouth Street to Beveland Street (Figure 18.660.6C) Street Element Width Notes Maximum Right-of-Way 96’ Vehicle Lane 11’ – 12’ One 11’ travel lane in each direction and a continuous 12’ center turn lane are required. Sidewalk 6’ – 9’ See 18.660.090.C.4.b.i. Bike Lane 6’ Landscape/Bus Stop Corridor 5’ – 8’ See 18.660.090.C.4.b.ii and iii. Flex Parking Lane 11’ See 18.660.090.C.4.b.iv. Flex parking lanes on both sides of the street are required. Flex parking lanes must accommodate bus pull-outs where bus stops are provided or required. Flex parking lanes provide on-street parking during non-peak travel times and convert to travel lanes during peak travel times. Signage with parking and travel times, including violation warnings and consequences, is required. Beveland Street to Gonzaga Street (Figure 18.660.6D) Street Element Width Notes Maximum Right-of-Way 104’ Vehicle Lane 11’ – 12’ Two 11’ travel lanes in each direction and a continuous 12’ center turn lane are required. Sidewalk 6’ – 9’ See 18.660.090.C.4.b.i. Bike Lane 6’ Landscape Corridor 5’ See 18.660.090.C.4.b.ii. Parking Lane 8’ See 18.660.090.C.4.b.iii, iv, and v. Proposed Code Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 PC Draft (12/6/2021) Page 10 of 13 A parking lane on the east side of the street is required. The parking lane must accommodate bus stops where provided or required. Gonzaga Street to Highway 217 (Figure 18.660.6E) Street Element Width Notes Maximum Right-of-Way 96’ Vehicle Lane 11’ – 12’ Two 11’ travel lanes in each direction and a continuous 12’ center turn lane are required. Sidewalk 6’ – 9’ See 18.660.090.C.4.b.i. Bike Lane 6’ Landscape/Bus Stop Corridor 5’ – 8’ See 18.660.090.C.4.b.ii and iii. Figure 18.660.6A Street Elements and Widths for 72nd Avenue Pacific Highway to Red Rock Creek Proposed Code Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 PC Draft (12/6/2021) Page 11 of 13 Figure 18.660.6B Street Elements and Widths for 72nd Avenue Red Rock Creek to Dartmouth Street Figure 18.660.6C Street Elements and Widths for 72nd Avenue Dartmouth Street to Beveland Street Proposed Code Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 PC Draft (12/6/2021) Page 12 of 13 Figure 18.660.6D Street Elements and Widths for 72nd Avenue Beveland Street to Gonzaga Street Figure 18.660.6E Street Elements and Widths for 72nd Avenue Gonzaga Street to Highway 217 Proposed Code Amendments: Planning Commission Draft 12/06/2021 PC Draft (12/6/2021) Page 13 of 13 cb. Street trees. dc. Stormwater facilities. ed. Pedestrian facilities. fe. Bicycle facilities. i. Bicycle facilities include bicycle parking, on-street shared lanes, on-street bike lanes (including buffered or protected bike lanes), trails, and paths. Trails and paths are defined in Subparagraph 18.660.090.C.4.d.i. gf. Transit facilities. i. Transit facilities include transit stops, transit shelters, transfer stations, and other related public transit facilities. ii. Transit facility improvements include, but are not limited to: benches, signage, shelters, bus turnouts, curb extensions, bicycle parking, pedestrian crossings, and pedestrian lighting. iii. Factors that determine the level of transit improvements needed include, but are not limited to: street classification, existing and planned level of transit service on adjacent streets, block length, proximity of major pedestrian destinations, existing and estimated ridership, and estimated transit needs of the proposed development. iv. Transit facilities must comply with current TriMet and city standards with final approval by the City Engineer. D. Fee in lieu of construction (FILOC). If improvements to public transportation facilities are required by Subparagraph 18.660.040.B.2.b, the applicant may request to pay a fee in lieu of constructing the required improvements. The provisions of this Subsection do not allow the applicant to a pay a fee in lieu of dedicating any needed public right-of-way. 1. FILOC review criteria. The city may accept a fee in lieu of constructing the required improvements when one or more of the following conditions exist. a. The city is actively in the process of studying or developing new design standards for one or more of the streets on which the proposed development has frontage. b. Required improvements are not feasible due to the location of existing development or frontage improvements. c. Required improvements are not feasible due to the inability to achieve proper design and safety standards. d. Required improvements are part of a larger approved capital improvement project that is listed as a funded project in a local or regional Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and is scheduled for construction within 5 years of the city’s approval of the proposed development. Tigard On the Move Transportation System Plan Prepared By: November 2021 Table of Contents Section Title NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Table of Contents Chapter 1 | Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Evolution from the Previously Adopted TSP ............................................................................ 2 1.2. Plan Background & Regulatory Context ................................................................................... 3 1.3. Organization of the 2040 TSP .................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2 | Public Involvement Summary ....................................................................... 8 2.1. Outreach Activities ........................................................................................................................ 9 2.2. Messaging and Advertising ........................................................................................................ 10 2.3. Activity Summaries ....................................................................................................................... 11 2.4. Overarching Outreach (Phases 1-3) ........................................................................................ 14 Chapter 3 | TSP Development ........................................................................................... 16 3.1. Vision and Goals ........................................................................................................................... 16 3.2. Policy Framework ......................................................................................................................... 18 3.3. Evaluation Framework ................................................................................................................. 21 3.4. Technical Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 26 Chapter 4 | Modal Plans ................................................................................................... 28 4.1. Plan Area ....................................................................................................................................... 29 4.2. Land Use ........................................................................................................................................ 31 4.3. Demographics .............................................................................................................................. 32 4.4. Pedestrian Plan ............................................................................................................................ 33 4.5. Bicycle Plan ................................................................................................................................... 43 4.6. Transit Plan ................................................................................................................................... 53 4.7. Motor Vehicle Plan ...................................................................................................................... 65 4.8. TDM and TSMO Plan .................................................................................................................. 77 4.9. Rail, Water, Air, and Pipeline Plan ............................................................................................ 80 Chapter 5 | Transportation Funding .............................................................................. 83 5.1. Estimated Transportation Resources ....................................................................................... 83 5.2. Revenue sources for which City has direct control over ..................................................... 86 5.3. Non-City revenue sources ......................................................................................................... 87 5.4. Other Potential Revenue Sources ............................................................................................ 87 Table of Contents Section Title NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Chapter 6 | Recommended Investments ......................................................................... 89 6.1. Project List ..................................................................................................................................... 89 6.2. Citywide Programs ..................................................................................................................... 112 Chapter 7 | Special Planning Areas ................................................................................ 116 7.1. Land Use Planning ..................................................................................................................... 116 7.2. Parking Management ................................................................................................................ 116 7.3. Tigard Triangle ............................................................................................................................ 116 7.4. Washington Square Regional Center ..................................................................................... 119 7.5. Downtown Tigard ...................................................................................................................... 122 7.6. River Terrace .............................................................................................................................. 124 Chapter 8 | Implementation Plan ................................................................................. 126 8.1. Programmatic and Code Changes ........................................................................................ 126 8.2. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures ................................................................................... 127 8.3. Emerging Technologies ........................................................................................................... 129 8.4. Transportation Planning Toolbox & Tracking Our Progress Over Time ........................ 132 8.5. Systemwide Performance Measures ..................................................................................... 134 Table of Contents PREFACE NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Tigard on the Move, the City of Tigard’s 2040 Transportation System Plan (2040 TSP) charts a roadmap for providing equitable mobility in our community over the next 20 years. The development of this plan was guided by City of Tigard staff, a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Community Advisory Committee (CAC), as well as the Planning Commission and City Council. Additionally, this plan was informed by broad-based input gathered over multiple phases of community engagement to better understand the Tigard community’s priorities and concerns, as they relate to transportation and mobility. The TAC provided guidance on technical aspects of the 2040 TSP and consisted of representatives from local and regional agencies. The CAC was comprised of Tigard residents to ensure that community perspectives were considered in the crafting of the 2040 TSP. Members from each of these groups are shown below. City Team Dave Roth, Senior Transportation Planner Susan Shanks, Senior Planner Gary Pagenstecher, Project Planner Lauren Scott, Community Engagement Coordinator Schuyler Warren, Senior Planner Joe Wisniewski, City Engineer Carla Staedter, Engineering Project Manager Tom McGuire, Assistant Community Development Director 2021 City Council Jason Snider, Mayor Heidi Lueb, Council President John Goodhouse, Councilor Liz Newton, Councilor Jeanette Shaw, Councilor Aishiki Nag, Youth City Councilor 2021 Planning Commission Yi-kang Hu, President Nathan Jackson, Vice President Melanie Brook Darlene Dick Ahsha Miranda Alexandria Quinones John Roberts Craig Schuck Keshavan Tiruvallur Jamie Watson Cole Whitehurst Table of Contents PREFACE NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN Technical Advisory Committee Steve Kelley, Senior Transportation Planner, Washington County Jean Senechal Biggs, Transportation Planner Manager, Beaverton Glen Bolan, Principal Planner, ODOT John Russell, Traffic Analysis Engineer, ODOT Avi Tayar, Development Review Team Leader, ODOT Brenda Martin, Service Planner, TriMet Mike McCarthy, Principal Transportation Engineer, Tualatin Keith Liden, Planner, King City Jeannine Rustad, Planning Manager, Tualatin Hills Parks and Recreation John Wolff, City Liaison, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Community Advisory Committee Ben Gooley, Committee Member, TTAC George Brandt, Committee Member, TTAC Ruth Harshfield, Chair, TTAC Ali Quinona, Committee Member, Planning Commission Jamie Watson, Committee Member, Planning Commission John Goodhouse, City Council, Tigard Basil Christopher, Former Tigard P/B Committee Mario Rosales Cortes, TTSD Geoff Smoke, TTSD Transportation Manager, TTSD Consultant Team Kendra Breiland, Fehr & Peers Briana Calhoun, Fehr & Peers Cadell Chand, Fehr & Peers Derek Abe, Alta Planning + Design Philip Longenecker, Alta Planning + Design Allison Brown, JLA Brandy Steffen, JLA Matt Hastie, Angelo Planning Group 2040 Transportation System Plan NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 1 Chapter 1 | Introduction The 2040 TSP was initiated in 2020 and responds to a new strategic vision for Tigard’s future, which emphasizes developing a multi-modal transportation system that is walkable, healthy, sustainable, and accessible for everyone. This TSP serves as an important long-range planning tool for Tigard to ensure its transportation system can meet community needs realize the City’s strategic vision and conform to state and regional policies. This document meets the state requirements for a TSP and acts as a resource for staff, decision makers and the public. It identifies the preferred multi-modal transportation system, consisting of a network of facilities adequate to serve local, regional, and state transportation needs. It is the principal document used for identifying the function, capacity, and location of future facilities, directing resources to transportation projects, and providing the community with the level of investment that will be needed to support anticipated growth and development over the next 20 years. The TSP also serves as the transportation element, and as a supporting document, of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan as required by state law. Goals and policies were identified at an early stage of the TSP update and are adopted as the Goal 12: Transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan. These goals and policies will help to guide future decisions. THIS TSP SERVES AS:  A blueprint for transportation investments;  A coordination tool with regional agencies and local jurisdictions;  An important component of prudent and effective land use choices; and  A compilation of existing and future transportation needs related to pedestrians, bicycles, transit, automobiles, freight, and emerging technologies. TIGARD ON THE MOVE, THE CITY OF TIGARD’S 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN (2040 TSP) CHARTS A ROADMAP FOR EQUITABLE MOBILITY IN OUR COMMUNITY OVER THE NEXT 20 YEARS. Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 2 1.1. Evolution from the Previously Adopted TSP The last TSP was adopted in 2010 and featured a bold project list of capital projects with a combined capital value exceeding $600 million. While the list included multimodal facilities like sidewalks and trails, the most capital-intensive projects on the TSP project list were roadway widening projects, Highway 217 crossings, and intersection projects along Pacific Highway (OR99W). Over the past 11 years, many of the projects identified in the last TSP have been advanced, either in construction or design. Examples include:  Pacific Highway upgrades, including added turn lanes and signal modifications at the intersections with SW 72nd Avenue, SW Hall Boulevard, McDonald-Gaarde, and Walnut Street; addition of a southbound auxiliary lane between 72nd Avenue through the OR- 217 interchange, and a raised landscaped median along the Tigard Triangle.  Walnut Street improvements (116th Avenue to Tiedeman Avenue) Roy Rogers Road (Scholls Ferry Road to Bull Mountain Road); and Bull Mountain Road at Roshak Road were completed in partnership with Washington County.  Main Street Green Street improvements in Downtown have been partially completed (southern half), which provide both a sense of arrival and advance environmental/ safety objectives.  Expansion of the City’s trail network, including Fanno Creek Trail segments and Tigard Street Heritage Trail, as well as planning for the Red Rock Creek Trail in the Tigard Triangle. Additionally, since 2010, the City has undertaken several substantial planning efforts that clarify a new strategic direction for Tigard. These include:  Adoption of a strategic vision in 2014, which was updated in 2020. This refreshed vision for the community emphasizes equity, accessibility, and walkability.  Annexation of River Terrace in 2014.  Adoption of a complete streets policy in 2019, which prioritizes the movement of people in the planning, design, operations, and maintenance of transportation facilities and improvements to create streets that work for people of all ages and abilities regardless of how they get around.  Land use and connectivity planning in the City’s designated centers, including Washington Square Regional Center, the Triangle, and Downtown.  Completion of a Transportation Safety Action Plan in 2019, which established an evidentiary basis for prioritizing investments that would address collisions involving people walking, bicycling, and driving as well as fatal crashes. Building on this momentum, the focus of the 2040 TSP has shifted to creating safe and comfortable Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 3 connections for active transportation, especially those walking and bicycling. This focus has been carried throughout the planning process and shaped the final list of projects and programs that the City will focus on over the 20 year planning horizon. 1.2. Plan Background & Regulatory Context There are numerous state, regional, and city plans that influenced the development of the 2040 TSP. State and regional plans provided a regulatory framework for the analysis and elements incorporated into the TSP, while the City’s plans provided more local context. This work is intended to be consistent with and complementary to the work that has already been done in Tigard, while responding to changing conditions. 1.2.1. State and Regional Context The Oregon Revised Statutes require that the TSP be based on the current Comprehensive Plan land uses and that it provides for a transportation system that accommodates the expected growth in population and employment that will result from implementation of the land use plan. Development of this TSP was guided by Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 197.712 and the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) administrative rule known as the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR, OAR 660-012). The TPR requires that alternative travel modes be given consideration along with the automobile, and that reasonable effort be applied to the development and enhancement of the alternative modes in providing the future transportation system. In addition, the TPR requires that local jurisdictions adopt land use and subdivision ordinance amendments to protect transportation facilities and to provide walking and bicycling facilities between residential, commercial, and employment/institutional areas. It is further required that local communities coordinate their respective plans with the applicable county, regional and state transportation plans. The Metro Council adopted the Climate Smart Strategy in December 2014 to respond to a state mandate to reduce per capita greenhouse gas emissions from cars and small trucks by 2035. The strategy affirms and reflects the region’s shared commitment to provide more transportation choices, keep air clean, build healthy and equitable communities and grow the economy, while at the same time reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In March 2020 the Governor issued Executive Order 20-04 directing state agencies to take actions to reduce and regulate greenhouse gas emissions and establishing new emissions reduction goals for Oregon. This commitment to reducing transportation-related greenhouse gases was integrated in concept in the development of the TSP. Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 4 The TSP was also prepared consistent with the Portland Metro 2018 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The RTP provides a regional framework for transportation planning and investment, including implementation of Metro’s 2040 Growth Concept. The update of the Tigard TSP has been developed in close coordination with the 2018 RTP update process to ensure consistency at the state and regional levels. Metro’s Regional Mobility Policy includes the mobility targets for facilities designated on the Regional Motor Vehicle Network and state-owned facilities in the UGB in Tigard as shown in Table 2. For evaluating the performance of these roadways, Tigard uses the Deficiency Thresholds identified in Table 3.6: Interim Regional Mobility Policy of the RTP until such time that a new Regional Mobility Policy is adopted. Led by ODOT and Metro, the policy is in the process of being updated in 2019-2021. While the recommendations from this update are still under development and thus cannot be incorporated into this TSP, the City coordinated extensively with ODOT in the development of this TSP and will continue to do so for subsequent planning efforts in the City. A memo summarizing how the TSP and implementing ordinances are compliant with the 11 The Metro 2040 Growth Concept (2018) identified ten urban design components as focal points for growth in the region. The definitions for each design type and maps for the Metro region can be found at: https://www.oregonmetro.gov/2040-growth-concept. TPR and other regulatory requirements is provided in the Technical Appendix. 1.2.2. Mode Share Targets As part of the 2018 RTP and the 2040 Growth Concept, Metro identified maximum mode share targets for Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) travel for designated Centers1 as shown in Table 1. The Metro RTP also has a goal for the region to triple walking, bicycling, and transit mode shares by 2035, compared to 2015. Table 1. Metro RTP Mode Share Targets 2040 DESIGN TYPE NON-DRIVE ALONE MODAL TARGET Portland Central City 60-70% Regional Centers Town Centers Main Streets Station Communities Corridors Passenger intermodal facilities 45-55% Industrial Areas Freight intermodal facilities Employment Areas Neighborhoods 40-45% 3-70 Chapter 3 | System Policies to Achieve Our Vision 2018 Regional Transportation Plan | December 6, 2018 Table 3.6 Interim regional mobility policy Deficiency thresholds for peak hour operating conditions expressed as volume to capacity ratio targets as adopted in the RTP and Oregon Highway Plan. Locations Target Target Mid-day One-Hour Peak A, B PM Two-Hour Peak A, B 1st hour 2nd hour Central City Regional Centers Town Centers Main Streets Station Communities .99 1.1 .99 Corridors Industrial Areas Intermodal Facilities Employment Areas Neighborhoods .90 .99 .99 I-84 (from I-5 to I-205) .99 1.1 .99 I-5 North (from Marquam Bridge to Interstate Bridge) .99 1.1 .99 OR 99E (from Lincoln Street to OR 224 interchange) .99 1.1 .99 US 26 (from I-405 to Sylvan interchange) .99 1.1 .99 I-405 C (from I-5 South to I-5 North) .99 1.1 .99 Other state-owned routes D I-205 C I-84 (east of I-205) I-5 (Marquam Bridge to Wilsonville) C OR 217 US 26 (west of Sylvan) US 30 OR 8 (Murray Boulevard to Brookwood Avenue) C, D OR 47 OR 99W OR 212 E OR 224 OR 213 F .90 .99 .99 Table Notes: A. Unless the Oregon Transportation Commission has adopted an alternative mobility target for the impacted state-owned facility within the urban growth boundary, the mobility targets in this table (and Table 7 of the Oregon Highway Plan) are considered standards for state-owned facilities for purposes of determining compliance with OAR 660-012-0060. B. The volume-to-capacity ratios in this table (and Table 7 of the Oregon Highway Plan) are for the highest two consecutive hours of weekday traffic volumes. The 2nd hour is defined as the single 60-minute period, either before or after the peak 60-minute period, whichever is highest. See Oregon Highway Plan Action 1.F.1 for additional technical details for state-owned facilities. The mid-day peak hour is the highest 60-minute period between the hours of 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. C. A corridor refinement plan, which will likely include a tailored mobility policy, is required by the Regional Transportation Plan for this corridor. Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 6 Metro’s travel demand model estimates base year (2015) and forecast (2040) mode shares as a function of several factors, including street connectivity, transit availability and parking pricing. Table 3 shows the made shares estimated in Metro’s 2015 and 2040 travel demand model for the City of Tigard. Table 3. Estimated Daily Mode Split in Tigard TRAVEL MODE MODELED ESTIMATE 2015 2040 CHANGE Automobile 92.0% 87.3% -4.7% Single Occupancy Vehicle 52.6% 48.9% -3.7% Shared Ride 39.3% 38.3% -1.0% Transit 1.7% 4.6% +2.9% Bike 4.4% 5.9% +1.5% Walk 1.9% 2.2% +0.4% Source: Washington County Travel Demand Model The Metro model indicates that Tigard’s base year and forecast 2040 SOV mode shares are within the RTP’s target range for a regional center. However, the model shows only slight improvements over the 25-year planning period. This reflects a forecast condition that assumes generally consistent conditions related to transit, parking pricing, and connectivity. The City will fall short of its climate mitigation and greenhouse gas reduction goals without a significant reduction in auto mode share. With this TSPs emphasis on supporting non-auto modes and with our coordinated land use planning, Tigard is striving to better these projections. Chapter 8 includes additional measures the City will implement to further reduce SOV travel. 1.2.3. City of Tigard Plans The development of the TSP began with a review of the local plans and policies that guide land use and transportation planning in Tigard. In addition to the previously adopted TSP (2010), the 2040 TSP incorporates the following other transportation planning efforts:  Tigard Strategic Plan (2020)  72nd Avenue Corridor Study (2020)  Tigard Complete Streets Policy and Implementation Plan (2019)  Tigard Transportation Safety Action Plan (2019)  Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan (2015)  River Terrace Community Plan (2014)  Tigard Washington Square Regional Center Plan and Update (1999; In Progress)  Tigard Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) These previous planning efforts informed the understanding of existing and future conditions, shaped the vision, goals, and policies, and were the starting point for the 2040 TSP project list. A complete list of the plans and policies reviewed as part of the project is included in the Technical Appendix. Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 7 1.3. Organization of the 2040 TSP The 2040 TSP is organized into the following chapters:  Chapter 2 summarizes the public involvement activities and stakeholder input received throughout the development of the TSP.  Chapter 3 includes the goals and policies that were developed to guide the city’s long-range vision of transportation system needs. It also documents the process that was undertaken to develop the 2040 TSP, including the screening and evaluation of transportation strategies and projects.  Chapter 4 breaks out the TSP findings and recommendations into modal plans. It also summarizes the existing conditions and future needs for pedestrians, bicycles, transit, autos, transportation demand management (TDM) and transportation systems management and operations (TSMO).  Chapter 5 provides the funding element of the TSP.  Chapter 6 outlines the recommended project list.  Chapter 7 outlines key revisions in the Tigard codes and policies that will be required to implement the 2040 TSP, as well key considerations for continuing to improve Tigard’s mobility beyond 2040. The Technical Appendix includes technical memoranda that were prepared in the development of the 2040 TSP. 2040 Transportation System Plan NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 8 Chapter 2 | Public Involvement Summary Between January 2020 and August 2021, the City of Tigard connected with over 2,000 community residents, businesses, and visitors to help shape the future of transportation in the City through a variety of outreach activities. These opportunities, as well as highlights from the feedback received, are summarized below. Public involvement for the development and review of the 2040 TSP was achieved in several ways:  Involvement by the community on the Community Advisory Committee (CAC)  Assistance and review by agency representatives on a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)  Virtual events and online surveys  Targeted digital and printed advertisements; and  Public hearings as part of the adoption process. In March 2020 Oregon entered mandatory COVID- 19 lockdown that restricted the gathering of people to reduce the spread of the virus. Outreach activities that were previously planned for face-to- face engagement were shifted to virtual/digital engagement. Advertising through social media, printed newspapers, postcards, and yard signs helped to spread the word in safe ways. It should be noted that some community groups were affected more by the COVID-19 outbreaks and Table of Contents Chapter 2 Public Involvement Summary NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 9 faced greater barriers to digital engagement, which resulted in reduced participation levels.2 2.1. Outreach Activities Below is a summary of the outreach activities grouped by the three project phases. The public had the opportunity to reach out to City staff to ask questions and share their thoughts on the project. The Technical Appendix includes all public comments and information collected throughout the TSP process. 2.1.1. Phase 1: TSP Initiation (January – December 2020)  Tigard on the Move Speaker Series- “Smart Cities... Resistance is Futile (Transportation & Technology)”; “Reimagining Suburbia: What’s Next? (Transportation and Urban Form)”; “Tigard Transportation System Plan (TrendLab)” – 60 people (virtual speaker series)  Transportation Goals Survey (digital outreach) - 206 people visited, 88 contributed 2 Background demographic data is included in the project’s Public Involvement Plan. Demographic questions were asked during each survey; however, there were not enough responses to know who participated in the outreach activities.  Transportation Needs Map (digital outreach) - 250 people visited, 150 comments collected  Community and Technical Advisory Committee meetings  Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee (TTAC) briefing  Tigard Planning Commission - TSP update briefing  Tigard City Council - TSP update briefing 2.1.2. Phase 2: Recommendations Development (January – June 2021)  Let’s Talk Transportation (virtual event) - 20 people attended  Prioritize Transportation Projects Survey (digital outreach) - 204 people participated  Tigard on the Move Speaker Series - “The Path to Mobility Equity- A Panel Discussion” (virtual speaker series) - 20 people attended  Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee (TTAC) monthly briefings throughout the process.  Tigard Planning Commission - TSP update briefing Table of Contents Chapter 2 Public Involvement Summary NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 10  Two Community and Technical Advisory Committee meetings 2.1.3. Phase 3: Plan Refinement and Adoption (July 2021-January 2022)  Community and Technical Advisory Committee meetings  Tigard Planning Commission - Public Hearing on December 6, 2021  Tigard City Council - TSP update briefing on January 11, 2022  Council briefing on Oct 26, 2021  Council Public Hearing on Jan 11, 2022 During all outreach phases, these goals guided the outreach activities and messaging:  Inform the public on the transportation system plan update.  Receive input and ideas on transportation issues, goals, network plans, projects, and programs from key stakeholders and the public.  Key stakeholders include members of the public that are already engaged in City transportation issues, and community members from historically underrepresented groups who have an interest in transportation.  Engage local elected officials, business and community leaders through education and outreach, policy discussions and a collaborative design process. 2.2. Messaging and Advertising Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all project outreach was conducted online. To ensure that community members knew about the project and would participate, the City used the following techniques to alert people to the project generally:  25 yard signs strategically placed throughout the city on major roads, neighborhoods, parks, and trails  Paid advertisements in Tigard Life  Cityscape weekly newsletter  Email blasts  Posts on social channels including Instagram, Nextdoor, Facebook, and Twitter Additionally, there were targeted outreach messages at key points to collect community feedback, using the methods above as well as a postcard that was mailed to all homes and businesses in Tigard before the final survey (May 2021). One of the 25 yard signs placed around the city. T igard’s Transportation System Plan (TSP) is a roadmap for future investments that support our community’s shared transportation system; one that serves all road users including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users, drivers, and freight. The TSP update has been guided by community input. Below is a summary of community feedback gathered between 2020-2021. This input will help shape the future of transportation and support equitable access for people of all ages and abilites. Make the most of transportation resources by leveraging funding opportunities, not overbuilding our system, and making investments that reduce ongoing system maintenance and preservation costs. 78% 82% 83% 74 % 67% 76% 6% 2% 7 % 6% 17% 8% 17% 16% 10% 21% 16% 16% Create livable neighborhoods that are designed to improve multimodal connections while discouraging unsafe interactions, such as cut- through traffic and speeding. Support economic vibrancy by accommodating the movement of people and goods and creating equitable opportunities for economic development throughout Tigard. Transportation System Plan Update ON THE MOVEON THE MOVE ON THE MOVE Transportation Goals: Improve quality of life for all, particularly historically marginalized and underserved communities, by providing access to jobs, schools, and essential services with convenient and affordable travel options. Provide a safe, comfortable, and connected transportation system for all users, especially pedestrians and other vulnerable. Support environmental and community health by reducing our carbon footprint, minimizing impacts to natural resources, and addressing unequal health impacts of our transportation system on low-income communities and communities of color. ON THE MOVEON THE MOVE ON THE MOVE Transportation Needs and Infrastructure Improvements New Sidewalk Prioritization Transit System Improvements (in order of importance) Bike Network Improvements 91 24 15 10Bike/Walk Needs Auto/Freight Needs 1. Near Schools 2. High Priority Safety Locations 3. Pedestrian Corridors and Near Transit & Trail Connections 1. Speed and Reliability on Key Corridors 2. Amenities at key transit shops (lighting, benches, shelter, etc.) 3. On-demand transit stops for those who can’t use a fixed system 1. Places with identified safety issues 2. Safe Crossings 3. Local circulation especially around schools and neighborhoods Transit Needs Other Needs TOP 3 TOP 3 Community members mapped existing needs around Tigard, and within their neighborhoods. Most comments involved walking and biking challenges. The community then prioritized locations of new sidewalks, bike network, and transit system improvements for future funding. TIGARD ON THE MOVE | 2040 Transportation System Plan Table of Contents Chapter 2 Public Involvement Summary NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 14 2.4. Overarching Outreach (Phases 1-3) 2.4.1. Advisory Committees To guide City of Tigard staff and the technical project team in the development of the TSP, two advisory committees were formed. The Community Advisory Committee (CAC) initially consisted of 10 members. Meeting topics included: 1. Introduction to the project, including draft vision and goals, schedule, and public engagement plan, as well as defining the CAC roles and responsibilities. (November 2020) 2. Overview of existing and future conditions; as well as introduction to a layered network approach (pedestrian, bicycle, transit, auto/freight). (February 2021) 3. Project update including review of goals and evaluation criteria; engagement update; project themes; and a funding update. (June 2021) 4. Proposed pedestrian and bicycle networks; discussion of key projects and ways to engage the community moving forward (September 2021) The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) initially consisted of 12 members including partner agencies, including ODOT, Washington County, Tualatin, Beaverton, King City, Metro, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, Tualatin Hills Parks & Recreation District, and TriMet. Meeting topics included: 1. Introduction to the project, including draft vision and goals, schedule, and public engagement plan, as well as defining the TAC roles and responsibilities. (November 2020) 2. Overview of existing and future conditions; as well as introduction to a layered network approach (pedestrian, bicycle, transit, auto/freight). (February 2021) 3. Project update including review of goals and evaluation criteria; engagement update; project themes; and a funding update. (June 2021) 4. Proposed pedestrian and bicycle networks; discussion of key projects and opportunities for regional partnerships (September 2021) 2.4.2. Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee (TTAC) Two members of the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee (TTAC) served on the project’s Community Advisory Committee. Additionally, City staff provided monthly project updates at TTAC meetings starting in November 2020. TTAC meetings are open to the public and opportunities to comment are provided. TTAC has supported the “Tigard on the Move” Events since their inception by assisting with planning and hosting the events during its scheduled monthly meeting time. Table of Contents Chapter 2 Public Involvement Summary NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 15 2.4.3. Tigard Planning Commission The Planning Commission was kept updated on the project progress through inclusion of two Tigard Planning Commission members serving on the Community Advisory Committee. City staff provided three TSP Update briefings to the Planning Commission on December 2, 2019, December 7, 2020,and April 19, 2021. At the time of publishing this document, the project team was planning to hold a Planning Commission briefing and public hearing on recommended adoption of the draft TSP on December 6, 2021. 2.4.4. Tigard City Council City Council was kept updated on the project progress through inclusion of one Tigard City Councilmember serving on the Community Advisory Committee. City staff provided two TSP Update briefings to Tigard City Council on September 15, 2020 and October 26, 2021. The City Council public hearing on TSP adoption is set for January 11, 2022. 2040 Transportation System Plan NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 16 Development of the 2040 TSP had two main components: creation of the goals and policies that would guide the process, and technical analysis that provided insight into the current and future conditions so that projects and programs could be developed to meet Tigard’s needs over the next 20 years. 3.1. Vision and Goals The 2040 TSP vision and goals were developed at the outset of the planning process to establish the City’s long range vision for providing equitable mobility and to guide the overall development of the TSP. The TSP vision and goals reflect the guidance received from City staff, the CAC, TAC, and the Planning Commission, as well as community feedback. The transportation goals and policies identify the intent of the city to accomplish certain results. They relate to one another and are obligations the City wishes to assume. They incorporate and build upon existing transportation goals and policies and prior plans adopted by the City, and integrate regional and statewide planning rules and policy, including the requirement for a multi-modal, balanced approach to transportation policy. The transportation goals and policies provide the necessary link to the transportation element of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and their purpose and function have been coordinated with Tigard’s Vision Statement to ensure consistency. Chapter 3 | TSP Development TIGARD ON THE MOVE | 2040 Transportation System Plan CHAPTER 3 TSP DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 18 3.2. Policy Framework The policies provide a framework of actions and direction that clearly define the ways the City should make decisions and prioritize when building and improving the transportation network. While many of these policies have been in place since 2010 TSP, others reflect updated priorities. TSP Vision: Tigard’s transportation system advances our Strategic Vision to be an equitable community that is accessible, walkable, and healthy for everyone. To do this we: 1. Provide a safe, comfortable, and connected transportation system for all users, especially pedestrians and other vulnerable users. 1.1. The City shall prioritize transportation projects according to community benefit, including (but not limited to) safety, performance, and accessibility, as well as the associated costs and impacts. 1.2. The City shall design, maintain, enhance, and invest in a transportation system that emphasizes multi-modal travel options for all types of land uses. 1.3. The City shall consider the multiple intended uses of a street and public rights of way during the design phase to promote safety, efficiency, and multi- modal needs. 1.4. The City shall coordinate with private and public developers and with agency partners — including Metro, TriMet, ODOT, Washington County and neighboring cities — to develop transportation projects which benefit the City of Tigard and the region as a whole by enhancing mobility, safety, and connectivity. 1.5. The City shall design streets to encourage a reduction in trip length by improving connections for all modes. 1.6. The City shall strive to provide mobility and accessibility for all roadway users through a balanced transportation network that is comprised of different roadway functional classes. 1.7. The City shall use strategies for access management to enhance safety and mobility. 1.8. The City shall design the transportation system, including investments in transit, to provide connectivity between Metro designated centers, corridors, employment, and industrial areas. 1.9. The City shall require new development to provide safe access for all modes to and from a publicly dedicated street. 1.10. The City shall use the deficiency thresholds identified in Table 3.6: Interim Regional Mobility Policy of the RTP as the performance standards for Tigard roads until such time that a new Regional Mobility Policy is adopted. 2. Support environmental and community health by reducing our carbon footprint, minimizing impacts to natural resources, and CHAPTER 3 TSP DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 19 addressing unequal health impacts/outcomes of our transportation system on low-income communities and communities of color. 2.1. The City shall support land use patterns that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and greenhouse gas emissions and preserve the function of the transportation system, including land use planning to reduce per capita vehicle miles traveled. 2.2. The City shall strive to protect the natural environment from impacts derived from transportation facilities. 2.3. The City shall support TriMet and other transit providers in enhancing transit services and amenities, especially along congested corridors and in low income communities or communities of color. 2.4. The City shall mitigate impacts to the natural environment associated with proposed transportation construction or reconstruction projects. 2.5. The City shall strive to reduce transportation-related impacts on low- income communities and communities of color in the design, location, and funding of transportation improvements. 2.6. The City shall support a transition toward greater adoption of electric vehicles and electric vehicle infrastructure. 2.7. The City shall support emerging technologies to reduce climate impacts from transportation, including micro- mobility, mobility as a service, and vehicle electrification. 3. Improve quality of life for all, particularly historically marginalized and underserved communities, by providing access to jobs, schools, and essential services with convenient and affordable travel options. 3.1. The City shall continue to work with TriMet and other regional partners to support existing and planned future commuter rail, high capacity and other transit service to, from, through and within Tigard and will seek opportunities for increased service frequency and passenger convenience and comfort. 3.2. The City shall develop a park and ride policy in collaboration with TriMet as it relates to potential future light rail. Park and Ride should be a temporary condition that would transition to TOD over time. 3.3. The City shall design and construct transportation facilities to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 3.4. The City shall require development adjacent to transit routes to provide direct pedestrian accessibility. 3.5. The City shall include an equity lens when considering transportation investments, emphasizing projects and programs that serve environmental justice communities and connect underserved areas. 3.6. The City shall work to address and enhance the safety and transportation needs of vulnerable users. CHAPTER 3 TSP DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 20 4. Create livable neighborhoods that are designed to improve multimodal connections while discouraging unsafe interactions. 4.1. The City shall develop and maintain neighborhood and local connections to provide efficient circulation in and out of the neighborhoods. 4.2. The City shall design all projects on Tigard city streets to encourage pedestrian and bicycle travel. 4.3. The City shall require sidewalks to be constructed in conjunction with private development and consistent with adopted plans. 4.4. The City shall require and/or facilitate the construction of off-street trails to develop pedestrian and bicycle connections that cannot be provided by a street. 4.5. The City shall provide bicycle and pedestrian routes to schools and other destinations by requiring appropriate bicycle and pedestrian facilities such as sidewalks, trails, and on-street bicycle routes to schools, parks, public facilities, and commercial areas. 4.6. The City shall enhance and maintain a neighborhood traffic management program to address issues of excessive speeding on local residential streets. 4.7. The City shall require safe routing of hazardous materials consistent with federal and state guidelines. 5. Support economic vibrancy by accommodating the movement of people and goods and creating equitable opportunities for economic development throughout Tigard. 5.1. The City shall manage the transportation system to support desired economic development activities. 5.2. The City shall design major transportation corridors, arterial routes, highway access, and adjacent land uses in ways that facilitate the efficient movement of people, goods, and services. 5.3. The City shall cooperate with the railroads in facilitating and preserving rail freight service to existing and future businesses that depend on railroad service. 6. Make the most of transportation resources by leveraging funding opportunities, not overbuilding our system, and making investments that reduce ongoing system maintenance and preservation costs. 6.1. The City shall prioritize investments in maintenance of the entire transportation system, including both roadway and non- motorized facilities. 6.2. The City shall seek to invest in capital projects that leverage other infrastructure investments. 6.3. The City shall strive to increase non-single occupant vehicle mode shares as well as reduce VMT through strategies, such as those outlined in the Regional Transportation Plan. 6.4. The City shall seek opportunities for transportation investments that support transportation goals of safety, mobility, access, and efficiency for all roadway CHAPTER 3 TSP DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 21 users through the operation and maintenance of intelligent transportation systems, including coordination of traffic signals. 6.5. The City shall use parking and curb management strategies that make the most of public transportation assets to support desired land use and community activities. 6.6. The City shall look for opportunities to reduce parking requirements to support affordable housing objectives and TOD. 3.3. Evaluation Framework The TSP Goals were used to develop a framework for evaluating potential transportation projects. Working with staff, a set of evaluation criteria were developed to measure the effectiveness of projects in supporting each goal. Two or three criteria were established for each goal with a total of 17 evaluation criteria identified, which collectively totaled to a maximum of 72 points that a project could receive. Discrete project ideas on the TSP project list were then evaluated using the criteria shown below in Table 4. This effort helped to prioritize projects and show whether a project supports the goals established for this TSP. Of high priority were projects that would potentially reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and help the City reach its goal to be carbon neutral by 2035. At the writing of this TSP, Oregon had just experienced an unprecedented heat wave resulting in the deaths of over 100 people, the state’s worst natural disaster on record. Climate scientists suggest these heat events will become increasingly common in the Pacific Northwest due to anthropogenic climate change brought about by the burning of fossil fuels. According to Oregon’s Department of Environmental Quality the transportation sector has, on average, accounted for nearly 40 percent of Oregon’s GHG emissions over the past thirty years. A significant portion of transportation sector GHG emissions can be attributed to cars and light trucks used for everyday travel. Locally, most trips (roughly 53% according to the Regional Travel Model) made by Tigard community members occur in single-occupancy vehicles; the majority of which are powered by internal combustion engines (ICE). Largely a function of the built environment and historical patterns of transportation and land use development, an ICE dominated transportation system disproportionately impacts marginalized populations. Historically marginalized communities are subject to an overwhelmingly greater share of negative outcomes from transportation and land use decisions. These populations suffer a legacy of community fragmentation, greater air and water pollution, and significant economic burden. Marginalized populations will also be impacted the CHAPTER 3 TSP DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 22 most by climatic changes brought about by GHG emissions. This TSP prioritizes projects that will address and mitigate for climate change and for past inequities in transportation investments in the Tigard community. CHAPTER 3 TSP DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 23 Table 4. Project Evaluation Criteria GUIDING PRINCIPLE PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORING Providing a safe, comfortable, and connected transportation system for all users, especially pedestrians and other vulnerable users. 1.1 Project addresses a location with a history of fatal/severe injury or bike/ped collisions; or is included in Transportation Safety Action Plan (TSAP) 4 Location with one or more fatal/severe injury collisions and/or multiple bike/ped collisions in the past 5 years; OR Location included in TSAP. 2 Location with one or more collisions of any type and severity in the past 5 years. 0 Location with no collisions in the past 5 years. 1.2 Project creates new connections for active transportation modes or rebuilds critical infrastructure 4 Project provides a new connection for people walking and bicycling (including a new high visibility crossing or dedicated facility, such as a sidewalk, trail, or bike lane) or rebuilds critical infrastructure (such as a bridge) 0 Project does not provide any of the above. 1.3 Project improves safe access to school 4 Project is listed on Tigard's Safe Routes to School maps 2 Project improves walking/bicycling/transit facility within 1/2 mile of a public or private school 0 Project does not provide any of the above. Maximum points 12 Supporting environmental and community health by reducing our carbon footprint, minimizing impacts to natural resources, and addressing unequal health impacts of our transportation system on low-income 2.1 Project encourages travel to be less impactful on the environment, including reducing vehicle travel by shortening trips or shifting to other modes, or making the vehicle travel that does occur more efficient. 4 Project or program reduces VMT (encourages shift to other modes or reduces vehicle trip length) 2 Project or program makes vehicle travel more efficient (ITS or intersection improvement) 0 Project does not provide any of the above. 2.2 Project reduces negative health impacts such as noise and air pollution on existing neighborhoods. 4 Project reduces noise or emissions. 0 Project does not provide any of the above. CHAPTER 3 TSP DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 24 GUIDING PRINCIPLE PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORING communities and communities of color. 2.3 Project helps residents access natural areas and/or parks. 4 Trail project that helps residents access natural areas and/or parks. 2 Other project benefiting park access. 0 Project does not provide any of the above. Maximum points 12 Improving quality of life for all, particularly historically marginalized and underserved communities, by providing access to jobs, schools, and essential services with convenient and affordable travel options. 3.1 Project benefits high equity areas. 4 Project intersects with a high equity area, as defined by Tigard's Equity Index. 0 Project does not provide any of the above. 3.2 Project improves transit access or quality of service for riders in Tigard 4 Project results in increased transit service or access for Tigard residents. 0 Project does not provide any of the above. 3.3 Project improves travel time reliability 4 Project relieves traffic congestion or results in improved travel time reliability for auto or transit 0 Project does not provide the above. Maximum points 12 Creating livable neighborhoods that are designed to improve multimodal connections while discouraging unsafe interactions, such as speeding. 4.1 Project represents an urban upgrade to more complete streets 6 Complete streets improvement. 0 Project does not provide any of the above. 4.2 Residential street improvements that make neighborhoods more livable. 6 Project is in a residential area and includes lighting, improves visibility, or widens an existing bike or pedestrian facility 0 Project does not provide any of the above. Maximum points 12 Supporting economic vibrancy by 5.1 Project creates new or improved connections to 4 Transportation connections facilitating mobility in these specific areas. CHAPTER 3 TSP DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 25 GUIDING PRINCIPLE PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORING accommodating the movement of people and goods and creating equitable opportunities for economic development throughout Tigard. regional destinations, including Downtown Tigard, Tigard Triangle, WSRC, or major transit stops. 0 Project does not provide any of the above. 5.2 Project increases capacity for motorized and/or other modes on the collector or arterial network 4 Project improves volume to capacity (V/C) on collectors and arterials or increases transit/freight throughput. Creates better connections to high-capacity ODOT facilities. 0 Project does not provide any of the above. 5.3 Project accommodates movement of goods 4 Project meets a specific freight-accommodation needs 0 Project does not provide any of the above. Maximum points 12 Making the most of transportation resources by leveraging funding opportunities, not overbuilding our system, and making investments that reduce ongoing system maintenance and preservation costs. 6.1 Project meets objectives of multiple planning efforts or departments. 4 Project is listed on other adopted City plans or could be incorporated into separate city effort. 0 Project is not included on any other adopted plan. 6.2 Project builds on investments in transportation funded primarily by entities other than the City of Tigard. (state, regional, county, grants, or development impact fees) 4 Project may receive funding from non-City sources. 2 Project eligible for system development charge or transportation development tax funding 0 Project would rely on local funding 6.3 Project improves or maintains existing facility conditions and/or alleviates maintenance needs. 4 Projects that extend the lifespan of existing facilities or reduce future maintenance needs. 0 Project does not provide any of the above. Maximum points 12 Maximum Points (all criteria) 72 CHAPTER 3 TSP DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 26 3.4. Technical Analysis The technical analysis performed for the 2040 TSP built on work completed for other planning efforts as well as an updated analysis of existing conditions, forecast needs, and a multi-step evaluation of improvement options. The section is organized as follows:  2020 Baseline Conditions Analysis  2040 Forecast Analysis  Identification of Needs  Draft and Final Project List Creation 3.4.1. 2020 Baseline Analysis An inventory of the existing transportation system was developed. This inventory documented transportation-related facilities and services within the Tigard Urban Planning Area, as well as other important planning considerations, including the location of natural resources and areas where sociodemographic groups with higher transportation needs reside. The data and analysis included the roadway network, traffic conditions, safety performance, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and transit service, among other topics. The findings of the technical analysis are summarized in the Modal Plans in Chapter 4, with more detail included in the Technical Appendix. 3.4.2. 2040 Forecast Analysis The horizon year of this plan is 2040, which is consistent with the Metro Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) that was completed in 2018. The future year forecasts were developed using the Washington County Travel Demand Model, which assumes Metro’s forecast of regional land use growth through 2040, as well as Metro’s list of financially constrained transportation projects. Outputs from this model were used to understand growth patterns throughout the City and traffic growth for the operations analysis. Future transportation conditions were evaluated based on the forecast land use and planned improvements. These findings are briefly summarized in the Modal Plans in Chapter 4, with more detail included in the Technical Appendix. 3.4.3. Identification of Needs Future multimodal transportation needs in Tigard were identified based on an assessment of existing conditions, planned transportation investments, and anticipated growth in population and employment, both within Tigard and throughout the region. The identification of key issues was informed by input from City of Tigard staff, public comment, and issues raised in other plans and studies. Many of the roadway policies and projects from the 2010 TSP have been carried into this TSP with updates, such as adjustments to classifications or CHAPTER 3 TSP DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 27 travel speeds. A major focus of this TSP is providing more robust facilities for active modes (like walking and bicycling) and connections to transit in order to provide a more complete transportation network in Tigard. To identify needs for this TSP, the gaps in the current system were identified for each mode, along with potential strategies to complete the system. In addition to individual project needs identified, there are several larger transportation issues that will require additional focused study and would likely involve multiple agencies and/or regional investment. These future studies are presented in the Special Study Areas table in Chapter 6. 3.4.4. Draft Project List To draft the initial, unconstrained project list for Tigard, the projects from numerous planning efforts were compiled. These projects came from:  Tigard’s Capital Improvement Program (2022-2027)  Tigard’s 2010 TSP constrained and unconstrained project lists  The River Terrace amendment to the TSP (2014)  Tigard’s Transportation Safety Action Plan (2019)  The 72nd Avenue Corridor study (2019)  The Regional Transportation Plan financially constrained project list (2018) New projects were added as identified in the future needs assessment, which addressed capacity constraints at key intersections, the need for more robust transit service and amenities, and a stronger emphasis on closing bicycle and pedestrian system gaps. This initial, unconstrainted list was then narrowed to remove duplicate projects from multiple plans, projects that had been completed, and those that are no longer deemed feasible. Project descriptions and costs were updated as needed to reflect the most recent estimates. 3.4.5. Final Project List After creation of the draft project list, discrete project ideas on the TSP project list were then evaluated using the evaluation framework described above. Input from the TAC, CAC, city staff, as well as the community also influenced which projects were included on the final project list. The final package of projects was balanced across modes, costs, and geography to give the City a range of project options that could be built as funding becomes available. A summary of this process is included in the Technical Appendix. 2040 Transportation System Plan NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 28 Chapter 4 | Modal Plans Transportation planning in Tigard is shaped by both opportunities and constraints. Projected growth over the next 20 years, both in Tigard and throughout the region, will increase travel demand and associated congestion, but increasing roadway capacity is unlikely to solve these problems. Tigard’s Strategic Vision emphasizes developing a multimodal transportation system that is accessible, walkable, and healthy for everyone. To achieve this vision, the focus has shifted to strengthening connections, access, and opportunities for all residents with a strong emphasis on equity, safety, and multimodal accommodation, particularly for walking and bicycling modes. This shift guided the identification of priorities, projects, and programs for implementing this TSP over the next 20 years. Key elements of this TSP include:  Completing our streets to serve everyone: Recognizing that our streets play host to more than just cars. We can do this by reviewing speed limits; completing the system for walking and bicycling; and making the most of 2-3 lane cross sections where planned five-lane sections would drastically increase costs while negatively impacting neighborhoods and conditions for active transportation.  Breaking connectivity barriers: This TSP prioritizes two new active transportation crossings of OR-217, one at SW 95th Avenue and another in the vicinity of the Tigard Triangle. Adequate vehicle connections into the Triangle should also be considered.  Continuing to invest in our trail system: Moving forward with key projects like the Fanno Creek gap closure; construction of the Red Rock Creek Trail and Heritage Trail crossing at Tigard Street; and modernization/upgrades to existing trails.  Highlighting bottlenecks issues and intersection alignment opportunities: Thinking systemically about improving circulation at locations such as the N Dakota Street/Tiedeman Avenue/Greenburg Road area and the Scoffins Street/Hunziker Street alignment at Hall Boulevard. These are challenges locations that will require additional study to identify a right-sized solution; however this TSP recognizes that the time is now to begin crafting solutions.  Partnering on regional mobility solutions: Many of the most important improvements aren’t fully within Tigard’s jurisdiction, such as the Upper Boones Ferry/72nd Avenue/Durham Road Chapter 4 | Modal Plans Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 29  Circulation Study; 99W Regional Investment Strategy; Bull Mountain Corridor upgrades; partnering to improve transit access and speed & reliability. These projects will require regional coordination, but Tigard can be a leader in making carrying these efforts forward. The following sections describe the planning environment in Tigard, including the land use that helps to shape the transportation system and the demographics of the people who live and work in Tigard. Each transportation mode is then described with a summary of existing and future conditions, as well as the City’s proposal modal network, which guided the development of projects and programs, which are identified in in Chapter 6. 4.1. Plan Area The City of Tigard is located in Washington County, about 10 miles southwest of Downtown Portland. It is a part of the Metro region, located adjacent to the cities of Beaverton, Portland, King City, Durham, Tualatin, and Lake Oswego. With a population of about 53,000 people, Tigard has seen steady population and job growth in the last decade. New development, including River Terrace on the west side of the city and expansion of the City’s boundaries have increased the housing opportunities and density in Tigard since the last TSP update. As shown in Figure 1 below, Tigard is generally bounded by Scholls Ferry Road to the northwest, I- 5 to the east, and the Tualatin River to the south. Highway 217 crosses the north end of the city and Pacific Highway (OR99W) bisects Tigard, connecting travelers to Portland in the north and Tualatin, Sherwood, and Yamhill County in the south. There are numerous roads in Tigard under ODOT or Washington County jurisdiction, making interagency coordination an important part of transportation planning in Tigard. The plan area includes both the City of Tigard boundary and sections of unincorporated Washington County within Tigard’s Urban Service Area. The Urban Service Area is within the City’s planning area but does not include transportation planning. 99W 217 5 Taylors Ferry Rd 121stAveTiedemanAve72nd AveB e e f B e n d R d GreenburgRd Mcdonald St Walnut St Dartmouth S t Gaarde St 68th AveHunzikerRd Hall Blvd150thAvePfaffle St 135thAve68thPkwy80th AveOak St Durham Rd 85th AveRoy Rogers RdBonita RdBull Mountain Rd SequoiaPkwyB u r n h a m S t Barrows Rd 78th AveScholls Ferry R d Wall StFigure 1 Tigard Planning Area 0 1 2½ Miles ODOT Roadways Tigard Urban Service Area Tigard City Boundary N Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 31 4.2. Land Use The types and intensities of land uses are significant factors influencing travel demand and mode choice. Low-density development tends to correlate with higher rates of driving, whereas dense, mixed-use developments have been found to result in shorter trips and more walking, bicycling, and transit use. The majority of Tigard is zoned for residential uses and single-family neighborhoods comprise much of the City’s land area. Commercial uses flank most of the City’s frontage of Pacific Highway, which serves as a major regional arterial, and many of the interchanges to Highway 217, which is grade- separated through Tigard. Tigard’s industrial district is located in the southwest quadrant of the City, running west of I-5 and Highway 217, centered around the Portland and Western Railroad (PNWR) rail line, which serves both freight and passenger rail. There are three mixed-use districts in the City, which have been a special emphasis of planning in recent years: Downtown Tigard, Tigard Triangle, and Washington Square Regional Center (WSRC). These districts, in addition to River Terrace, provide the opportunity to better connect residential uses with commercial and employment destinations, create a more efficient transportation system when short trips can made by walking or bicycling, rather than relying on a car. Tigard is planning for significant growth over the next few decades, both in households and employment. This growth includes development of new businesses, increased density in the Tigard Triangle and Downtown Tigard, and the accompanying increase in travel by all modes. Land use patterns in the City of Tigard and surrounding areas are suburban in character, with residential areas separated from commercial areas and a relatively low density of development overall. Based on current zoning and growth projections, forecast household growth in Tigard is highest in the River Terrace area where approximately 2500 new households are expected by 2040. Significant residential growth is also anticipated around the WSRC, in the Tigard Triangle, and in Downtown Tigard. Most of Tigard’s employment growth over the next few decades will occur near Highway 217 within the Tigard Triangle, neighborhoods around Washington Square, and in Downtown Tigard. The city has adopted plans to significantly increase density in Downtown Tigard and the Tigard Triangle. These planned changes in downtown, along with the strategies identified below, could move more houses close to jobs, increase mixed use development, and help mitigate the strain on the east-west roadways by shortening home-to- work trips, supporting transit service, and making walk/bike trips more viable for work, shopping, and other activities. Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 32 4.3. Demographics An evaluation of current socioeconomic conditions was conducted as part of the environmental justice analysis for transportation needs. Census data 3 were used to evaluate census blocks within the planning area based on percentages of the population comprised of one or more of the following populations:  Minority groups: people who did not self- identify as white non-Hispanic  Low-income residents: people who earned between 0–1.99 times the federal poverty level  Seniors: people 65 years of age or older  Children: people under the age of 18  Limited English-speaking individuals: people who self-identify as speaking limited English  People with disabilities: people five years or older with any type of disability: sensory, physical, mental, self-care, go-outside-the- home or employment  Residents that do not own a vehicle Examining the location and distribution of these populations in the City offers a way of identifying areas that may have a higher need for transportation services and projects as well as the 3 American Community Survey 5 year estimates, 2014-2018 potential negative impacts of new facilities. Findings include:  The percentage of non-white residents is high near Scholls Ferry Road and 135th Avenue, between Greenburg Road and Highway 217, and south of Upper Boones Ferry Road with the highest concentration to the east of Pacific Highway between McDonald Street and Main Street.  The same Census block group with the highest percentage of non-white residents also has the highest percentage of low- income residents.  Low-income residents are also concentrated to the east of Pacific Highway and along Highway 217. These tend to be areas with higher industrial and commercial land uses located along major transportation corridors, which are often less desirable housing options for more affluent residents.  The percentage of youth under age 18 is fairly evenly distributed across the City, but the senior population is heavily concentrated in the southeast neighborhoods between Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard.  The population with a disability is distributed near Pacific Highway and up to the Tigard Triangle. The type of disabilities Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 33 surveyed in the Census include a wide range of both physical and mental disabilities for all age groups, which may explain the high percentage of residents reporting a disability. Supporting maps and details from this analysis are provided in the Technical Appendix. 4.4. Pedestrian Plan Pedestrian facilities are the elements of the network that enable people to walk safely and efficiently on the transportation system. The pedestrian network includes both on- and off-street walkways (sidewalks, mixed-use trails) as well as safe crossings. Each plays a role in developing a comprehensive pedestrian network which can promote both walking trips and multi-modal trips such as using a combination of walking and transit to complete a trip. 4.4.1. Existing Pedestrian Network All roadways in Tigard, other than access- controlled freeways, are intended to accommodate walking. Completing a connected city-wide network for people walking allows the community to get around comfortably and conveniently using a combination of on-street facilities and off-street paths. As illustrated in the existing Pedestrian Network Map, (Figure 2), the quality of the pedestrian network in Tigard varies significantly across the City. While some areas of Tigard such as Downtown Tigard, the Summerlake Park neighborhood, and River Terrace have robust sidewalk coverage, coverage in other areas is more sporadic, including 83 miles of public streets that are missing sidewalks on one or both sides of the street. The majority of Tigard’s sidewalks are found on residential streets (73% of residential streets have a sidewalk on at least one side). Even when sidewalks are present along an arterial, very little buffering between pedestrians and vehicles tends to exist, making for an unpleasant walking experience along these busier, higher speed roadways. People with mobility issues or disabilities face special challenges in areas with gaps in the pedestrian facilities. The quality of the existing sidewalks, crossings, and trails can affect those with mobility issues even where there are complete facilities. All new pedestrian facilities are built to meet current ADA requirements and the City has a Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 34 program to address needs identified in the City’s 2019 ADA Transition Plan (discussed in more detail in Chapter 6). There are approximately 25 miles of trails in Tigard. These off-street path and trail facilities offer not only physical distance from traffic, but also a more comfortable, scenic, and attractive environment for people walking and bicycling. In some cases, these paths provide a more direct connection between origins and destinations. In other cases, they offer less direct, albeit more scenic and/or recreational, route alternatives to the sidewalk network. Trails are typically considered “all ages and abilities” facilities because they are separate from traffic and comfortable to most users. However special attention is needed where these pathways cross major roadways, to avoid barriers in the walking network. 4.4.2. Active Transportation Demand Analysis To better understand the role of the Tigard’s active transportation network in connecting people to destinations, an active transportation demand analysis was performed by overlaying the locations where people live, work, play, shop, learn, and access public transit into a composite sketch of user demand (see Figure 3). The results of this analysis was used to inform development of the City’s bike and pedestrian networks and associated improvement projects by highlighting areas where there is likely to be higher demand for facilities that enable active transportation. More details about the active transportation demand analysis methodology can be found in the Technical Appendix. 99 217 5 Taylors Ferry Rd 121stAveTiedemanAve72nd AveB e e f B e n d R d Locust St GreenburgRd Mcdonald St Walnut St Dartmouth St Gaarde St 68th AveHunziker RdHall Blvd150thAvePfaffle St 135thAveS c h o l l s F e r r y R d RoshakRd 68thPkwy80th AveOak St Durham Rd 85th AveRoyRogersRdMain StBonita Rd UpperBoonesFerryRdBu ll M ou ntai n R d SequoiaPkwyB urn ha m St Barrows Rd 78th AveWall StFigure 2 Existing Pedestrian Network 0 1 2½MilesN Sidewalk One Side Both Sides None Trail Tigard City Boundary 99 217 5 Taylors Ferry Rd 121stAveTiedemanAve72nd AveB e e f B e n d R d Locust St GreenburgRd Mcdonald St Walnut St Dartmouth St Gaarde St 68th AveHun z i k e r R d Hall Blvd150thAvePfaffle St 135thAve68thPkwy80th AveOak St Durham Rd 85th AveRoy Rogers RdMain StBonita RdBull Mountain Rd SequoiaPkwyB u r n h a m S tBarrowsRd 78th AveWall StFigure 3 Active TransportationExisting Land Use Demand Analysis 0 1 2½ MilesN Composite Demand Lower Score Higher Score Highway Trail Tigard City Boundary Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 37 4.4.3. Pedestrian Network Future Needs By identifying the network gaps and the areas of Tigard with the highest demand for walking and bicycling, future needs were identified. These needs fall into a few categories:  Sidewalk and crossing gaps  Topographical and freeway barriers  Pedestrian accommodations in key mixed use centers 4.4.3.1. Sidewalk and Crossing Gaps In comparing the places where active transportation demand is highest and where streets lack sidewalk infrastructure, there are a few locations that stand out:  Significant sections of Pacific Highway lack sidewalk infrastructure in places where there is high demand for it, particularly in the southern portion of the City. Additionally, multiple roadways that connect to Pacific Highway lack complete sidewalks.  There are gaps in the sidewalk network on Hall Boulevard and the streets connecting to it.  72nd Avenue is currently a high-stress environment for people walking and bicycling due to the lack of comfortable sidewalks, crossings, and substandard or missing striped bike lane. In particular, improvements are needed across Highway 217 and its ramps.  Sidewalk gaps along most of Washington Square Road and lack of crossings along SW Greenburg Road make it difficult for people to access the retail and employment opportunities at the Washington Square Mall by foot.  There are opportunities to improve pedestrian connections in areas with high transit ridership. These include connections to the Tigard Downtown Transit Center, along Pacific Highway, and along Hall Boulevard. Most of Tigard lacks a traditional connected street grid, meaning that even small gaps in the pedestrian network on major through streets like Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard are impactful to pedestrian connectivity and can lead to significant out of direction travel for people walking. Filling these gaps can have an inordinate benefit on the pedestrian network. Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 38 4.4.3.2. Topographical and Freeway Barriers Tigard is bounded by major arterials to the north and west, I-5 to the east, and the Tualatin River and mountainous terrain to the south. These major streets and topographical elements can be barriers to regional connections for all modes but especially those walking and bicycling. I-5 is Tigard’s eastern boundary, and there are limited crossing opportunities for people walking and bicycling. It is a significant barrier between Tigard and the Portland Community College campus just east of the freeway, as well as between Tigard and the cities of Portland and Lake Oswego. Highway 217 is a physical barrier that limits connectivity, especially for people walking and riding bikes. The 2010 TSP identified projects crossing Highway 217 in the Washington Square Regional Center (WSRC) and also connecting from SW Hunziker Street to SW Beveland Street in the Tigard Triangle. 4.4.3.3. Key Mixed Use Centers Some of the areas of the City with the highest demand for active transportation are the mixed use centers in Downtown Tigard and the Tigard 4 See the City Center Urban Renewal Plan for more details on future needs and projects. Triangle. The needs identified in these centers include: Downtown 4  Improving pedestrian and bicycle crossing opportunities at the intersection of Commercial Street and Hall Boulevard.  There are barriers to an at-grade crossing of the railroad tracks at Ash Avenue.  Explore opportunities and benefits of a connection from the Fanno Creek Trail to the new Universal Plaza in Downtown Tigard.  Re-align Fanno crossing at Main Street to create a more direct crossing, along with removing, replacing, and/or upgrading the existing wooden bridge south of Main Street. Tigard Triangle  Enhancement of 68th Avenue/Parkway as a key north-south spine through provision of sidewalks and buffered/protected bikeway between Atlanta Street to Pacific Highway.  Improvements to the 72nd Avenue Corridor, another critical north-south spine, to add sidewalks and protected bikeways as identified in the 72nd Avenue Study 5.  Multimodal improvements on SW Dartmouth Street to facilitate east-west travel through the district. 5 This study has not yet been adopted into the Tigard TSP. Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 39  Development of the Red Rock Creek with connections across the significant Hwy 217 and railroad barriers to the Fanno Creek Regional Trail, public library, and downtown for people of all ages and abilities. Development will be throughout the Tigard Triangle and across the rail line that creates a barrier to the Public Library and Hall Boulevard. The City has identified potential opportunities to connect this trail to Downtown via the planned Highway 217 overcrossing, a much safer east-west route than the current options that rely heavily on Pacific Highway. 4.4.3.4. Southwest Corridor and Transit Oriented Development Connections While funding for the Southwest Corridor is uncertain, ensuring that Tigard’s active transportation network aligns with this planned major regional investment is a priority. The Tigard Triangle is a planned major regional investment to accommodate transit and increased density, so these ideas may still be relevant regardless of the exact timing and alignment of the Southwest Corridor:  Pacific Highway is a significant barrier for cross travel, and historic crash records show that pedestrians and bicycles are especially vulnerable in this area. Providing enhanced crossings of Pacific Highway at 64th Avenue and either 68th Parkway or 69th Avenue would allow for safer, more comfortable pedestrian and bike crossings at these existing major signalized intersections.  Hall Boulevard will be a key north-south route between neighborhoods within Tigard, providing a critical function for accessing Downtown, the Tigard Transit Center, the Tigard Triangle, numerous civic uses, including the library. With a potential for jurisdictional transfer of this road, the city has an interest in enhancing this corridor with improved sidewalks and bikeways between SW Omara Street and Pacific Highway. 4.4.4. Planned Pedestrian Network Tigard aspires to provide a robust pedestrian system of connected sidewalks, crossings, trails, and pedestrian-only paths. Achieving this goal will require investment spread over many years, even beyond the planning horizon of this TSP. Pedestrian improvements should be prioritized based on their ability to complete connections between places that generate and attract pedestrian trips such as schools and housing; housing and transit stops; and employment and transit stops. Figure 4 shows Tigard’s Planned Pedestrian Network, which includes the following core elements: Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 40 1. Pedestrian Corridors - Streets intended to support higher pedestrian activity, with high quality sidewalks, buffers/landscaping, lighting, and pedestrian amenities. Pedestrian Corridors are often on busier, higher order streets with commercial/retail destinations, transit stops, and higher levels of activity. 2. Neighborhood Greenways - low-speed, low-volume, low-stress corridors that are designed to be more comfortable, welcoming, and attractive to people walking and bicycling, primarily on local streets to connect to neighborhood destinations such as parks, schools, transit, and other community destinations. Improvements include traffic calming, vehicle speed and volume reduction, and enhanced crossings of major roadways. 3. Trails - Paved, off-street shared use paths, that can be utilized by people walking, bicycling, and other non-motorized modes to connect to neighborhood and regional destinations. Trails connect seamlessly to pedestrian and bike facilities on the local street network with enhanced at-grade crossing improvements, overcrossings, and/or undercrossings. Proposed Active Transportation Connections are new grade-separated crossings and/or pedestrian facilities on new roadways that are not part of the current street network. The three Pedestrian Focus Areas shown on Figure 4 are areas of high pedestrian activity in Tigard’s Regional Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 41 and Town Centers that should be the focus of area- wide planning and priority. This network is intended to identify locations for future improvements and the ideal pedestrian network in the City. This does not dictate design elements that would contradict the City’s roadway functional class or design standards, but instead guides investments and project development. Taylors Ferry Rd 121st AveTiedeman AveevA dn27Roshak RdB e e f B e n d R d Mcdonald St Walnut St Dartmouth St Gaarde St 68th AveHun z i k e r R d 150th AvePfaffle St 135th AveS c h o l l s F e r r y R d 68th Pkwy80th AveGreenburg RdOak St 85th AveRoy Rogers RdBonita Rd Locust St Bull Mountain Rd Sequoia PkwyB u r n h a m S t Barrows Rd 78th AveDurham Rd Wall StKing CityFonner StFonner St Hall BoulevardHall BoulevardWatkins AvenueWatkins AvenueAsh AvenueAsh AvenueF a n n o C r e e k T r a i l F a n n o C r e e k T r a i lWe s t S i d e R e g i o n a l T r a i lWe s t S i d e R e g i o n a l T r a i l North Dakota StNorth Dakota St Sattler StSattler St Summerfield DrSummerfield Dr Cook Park Greenbelt Cook Park Greenbelt Ki-A-Kuts Bicycle & Pedestrian Bridge Ki-A-Kuts Bicycle & Pedestrian Bridge Murdock StMurdock St 5 PlannedPedestrian Network Figure 4 0 1 2½Miles N 217 99 Railroad City of Tigard Transit Center Water School Park Pedestrian Focus AreaPedestrian Corridor Neighborhood Greenway Trail Proposed Active Transportation Connection Highway 217 Crossing (location TBD) Existing FeaturesPlanned Pedestrian Network Existing Trail Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 43 4.5. Bicycle Plan Bicycle facilities are the elements of the network that enable cyclists to travel safely and efficiently. These facilities include public infrastructure (bicycle lanes, mixed-use trails, signage, and striping) as well as off-road facilities (secure parking, changing rooms and showers at worksites). Each plays a role in developing a comprehensive bicycle network. 4.5.1. Existing Bicycle Network As shown in Figure 6 below, existing bicycle facilities in Tigard are fairly evenly distributed across the City and come in four types:  Multi-use paths or trails (25 miles)  Buffered Bike Lanes (5 miles)  Bike Lanes (21 miles)  Shared Lane (Low, Moderate, or High Traffic: 67 miles) However, it is important to note that major roadway facilities like Pacific Highway, I-5, and Highway 217 present significant obstacles to bicycling across the City. Creating routes that allow people riding bikes to cross these major arterials and freeways safely and comfortably is critical to developing a bikeable city. 4.5.2. Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress For bicycling to be a viable option for most Tigard residents, bike facilities must be comfortable for most people, meaning they are on streets with low traffic volumes or offer physical separation between the bikeway and a vehicle travel lane. ‘The Four Types of Riders’ classification developed by the City of Portland describes how different segments of the population require lower stress facilities to feel comfortable bicycling. The number shown in parentheses is the approximate percentage of people in each category, based on national survey data. 1. Strong and Fearless (7%): People willing to bicycle with limited or no bicycle-specific infrastructure 2. Enthused and Confident (5%): People willing to bicycle if some bicycle-specific infrastructure is in place 3. Interested but Concerned (51%): People willing to bicycle if high-quality bicycle infrastructure is in place 4. No Way, No How (37%): People unwilling to bicycle even if high-quality bicycle infrastructure is in place Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 44 Figure 5. Four Types of Cyclists Source: Fehr & Peers, 2021. High comfort and low-stress facilities are vital to developing a fully functioning network that accommodates people of all ages and abilities. As shown in the mileage statistics above, over half of Tigard’s bikeway system is provided by shared-use lanes, typically on moderate to high volume streets, which are generally only accessible to the “strong and fearless” rider. The remainder of Tigard’s existing system is roughly split between multi-use paths and bike lanes, which are more accessible to a broader range of riders. To better understand the accessibility of Tigard’s bike network to all riders, a Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) analysis was performed to quantify perceived safety (stress) associated with roadways in Tigard for those traveling by bicycle (see Figure 7). LTS 1 represents low stress roadways that are suitable for most bicycle riders, including children and those in the ‘Interested but Concerned’ class of riders. Locations with LTS 1 are typically low-speed residential streets or bike facilities that are physically separated from motor vehicle traffic (i.e. multi-use paths or protected bike lanes). LTS 4 represents the highest level of stress and will only be suitable for ‘Strong and Fearless’ riders. LTS 4 facilities are the types of facilities found on many of Tigard’s arterial streets, which tend of have high speeds and two or more travel lanes in each direction. Details of the Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 45 LTS methodology and analysis can be found in the Technical Appendix. Over two-thirds of streets in Tigard received an LTS score of 1. These LTS 1 facilities are primarily local streets and multi-use trails. Despite the high number of LTS 1 facilities, most of the facilities that provide connections in between neighborhoods or access to destinations are high-stress facilities. Most arterials and collectors received an LTS score of 3, indicating most people will not feel comfortable bicycling on them. The following streets received an LTS score of 4, indicating that all but a few riders would feel uncomfortable using them:  Bull Mountain Road  Pacific Highway south of Gaarde Street/ McDonald Street  Hall Boulevard north of Highway 217 Overall, there are many low-stress bike facilities within Tigard, but they are not connected and do not form a low-stress network that provides access to key destinations or allow travel between most neighborhoods. The main barriers between the low-stress bike facilities are crossings of the higher- stress arterial and collector streets with bike lanes. These include Pacific Highway, Bull Mountain Road, Gaarde Street/McDonald Street, Durham Road, Scholls Ferry Road, Bonita Road, and portions of Hall Boulevard. 99 217 5 Taylors Ferry Rd 121stAveTiedemanAve72nd AveB e e f B e n d R d Locust St GreenburgRd Mcdonald St Walnut St Dartmouth St Gaarde St 68th AveHun z i k e r R dHall Blvd150thAvePfaffle St 135thAveS c h o l l s F e r r y R d RoshakRd 68thPkwy80th AveOak St Durham Rd 85th AveRoyRogersRdMain StBonita Rd UpperBoonesFerryRdBull Mountain Rd SequoiaPkwyB u r n h a m S t Barrows Rd 78th AveWall StFigure 6 Existing Bike Network 0 1 2½ MilesN Multi-use path Buffered Bike LaneBike Lane Difficult Connection Shared Lane on High traffic through street Shared Lane on Moderate traffic through streetShared Lane on Low traffic through street Tigard City Boundary 99 217 5 Taylors Ferry Rd 121stAveTiedemanAve72nd AveB e e f B e n d R d Locust St GreenburgRd Mcdonald St Walnut St Dartmouth St Gaarde St 68th AveHun z i k e r R dHall Blvd150thAvePfaffle St 135thAveS c h o l l s F e r r y R d RoshakRd 68thPkwy80th AveOak St Durham Rd 85th AveRoyRogersRdMain StBonita Rd UpperBoonesFerryRdBull Mountain Rd SequoiaPkwyB u r n h a m S t Barrows Rd 78th AveWall StFigure 7 Bicycle Level of Traffic StressAlong Bike Routes 0 1 2½ MilesN Level of Traffic Stress12 3 4 Tigard City Boundary Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 48 4.5.3. Bicycle Network Future Needs By identifying the network gaps, streets that are high-stress environments for bicycling, and the areas of Tigard with the highest demand for walking and bicycling, future needs were identified. These needs fall into a few categories:  Citywide bike routes and crossing gaps  Topographical and freeway barriers  Bicycle accommodations in key mixed use centers  Emerging and shared technologies 4.5.3.1. Citywide Bike Routes and Crossing Gaps In comparing the places where active transportation demand is highest and where the bike network lacks dedicated or exclusive facilities, a several locations stand out:  SW Greenburg Road is unique in that it is one of the few north-south connections that links multiple high demand areas and crosses Highway 217. However, the dedicated or exclusive bicycle facilities on this road are intermittent.  There is poor connectivity for bicycling along Pacific Highway, and at major crossings of Pacific Highway at SW 64th Avenue, SW 65th Avenue, SW 68th Parkway, and SW 69th Avenue. Facilities along Pacific Highway are high stress and likely only comfortable for ‘Strong and Fearless’ riders.  The existing trail network paired with planned improvements, has the potential to provide a higher degree of bicycle connectivity that should be leveraged and enhanced to further Tigard’s identity as a great place to bike.  There are very few multi-use paths or separated facilities north of Highway 217. Additionally, the high concentration of service roads that lack accommodations for bikes in the commercial areas means that bike facilities or sidewalks are scarce.  Hunziker Road and North Dakota Street are key east-west connections that could serve to connect major demand centers.  SW 69th Avenue is an important north/south connection between neighborhoods and the future station. The City could enhance this connection through implementing a Neighborhood Greenway or other dedicated bikeway treatment on SW 69th Avenue connecting to Pine Street and Oak Street.  Transit ridership in Tigard is highest around the Tigard WES Station, along Pacific Highway, and along Hall Boulevard. Lowering the stress of bike facilities around these locations provides an opportunity to increase multimodal trips. Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 49 4.5.3.2. Topographical and Freeway Barriers Connectivity in Tigard is challenged by the location of both I-5 and Highway 217 as major barriers to people walking and bicycling. Some potential strategies to improve bike connectivity include:  Improving the active transportation connection on the Atlanta Street/Haines Street overcrossing of I-5, including potential addition of buffered bike lanes.  Reassessing the planned Highway 217 crossings to increase connections across the freeway.  Completing the bike lanes and sidewalks on Pacific Highway to make this important roadway a safer option for active transportation; strategies should include filling gaps and enhancing facilities where there is sufficient right of way. 4.5.3.3. Key Mixed Use Centers Some of the areas of the City with the highest demand for active transportation are the mixed use centers in Downtown Tigard and the Tigard Triangle. The bicycle needs identified in these centers include: Downtown  Leverage Scoffins Street to provide an enhanced bikeway connection through Downtown Tigard to connect neighborhoods to the north to the future Southwest Corridor Hall Boulevard Station.  Provide bicycle facilities on Commercial Street to improve connections between the future Hall Boulevard Station and Downtown Tigard/Tigard Town Center. This would include improving pedestrian and bicycle crossing opportunities at the intersection of Commercial Street and Hall Boulevard. Tigard Triangle  Enhancement of 68th Avenue/Parkway as a key north-south spine through provision of sidewalks and buffered/protected bikeway between Atlanta Street to Pacific Highway.  Improvements to the 72nd Avenue Corridor, another critical north-south spine, to add sidewalks and protected bikeways as identified in the 72nd Avenue Study. 4.5.3.4. Emerging and Shared Technologies Bikesharing companies provide a network of bicycles for rent. The bikes are either placed at centralized docks throughout a service area or are dockless and can be left at any location within a service area. These services can have conventional bicycles, electric bicycles, and/or adaptive bicycles for people who cannot use a traditional bicycle. Similarly, electric scooter share is also available in some markets, including in Portland where a Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 50 number of competing companies provide dockless scooters for rent. While these services are not currently available in Tigard, the City should work toward implementing shared mobility solutions, particularly with new electric micro-mobility options that can help achieve TSP goals. 4.5.4. Planned Bicycle Network Many different bicycle facility types are needed to create a complete bicycle network that connects people to their destinations and allows cyclists to feel safe riding. Figure 8 shows the proposed bicycle network, including includes the following categories: 1. Major Street Bikeways - On-street bikeways along key transportation corridors. Major Street Bikeways typically coincide with bigger, busier streets with higher traffic speeds and volumes with commercial/retail destinations, transit stops, and higher levels of activity. Buffered bike lanes and protected bike lanes which provide dedicated bike facilities with physical separation are common facility types in this improvement category. 2. Neighborhood Greenways - low-speed, low- volume, low-stress corridors that are designed to be more comfortable, welcoming, and attractive to people walking and biking, primarily on local streets to connect to neighborhood destinations such as parks, schools, transit, and other community destinations. Improvements include traffic calming, vehicle speed and volume reduction, and enhanced crossings of major roadways. 3. Trails - Paved, off-street shared use paths, that can be utilized by people walking, biking, and other non-motorized modes to connect to neighborhood and regional destinations. Trails connect seamlessly to pedestrian and bike facilities on the local street network with enhanced at-grade crossing Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 51 improvements, overcrossings, and/or undercrossings. Both pedestrian and bicycle improvements have Neighborhood Greenways and Trails categories in common, by virtue of the types of improvements these facilities would involve, e.g., traffic calming, low-stress crossings of major roadways, etc. This network is intended to identify locations for future improvements and the ideal bicycle network in the City. This does not dictate design elements that would contradict the City’s roadway functional class or design standards, but instead guides investments and project development. Taylors Ferry Rd 121st AveTiedeman AveevA dn27Roshak RdB e e f B e n d R d Mcdonald St Walnut St Dartmouth St Gaarde St 68th AveHun z i k e r R d 150th AvePfaffle St 135th AveS c h o l l s F e r r y R d 68th Pkwy80th AveGreenburg RdOak St 85th AveRoy Rogers RdBonita Rd Locust St Bull Mountain Rd Sequoia PkwyB u r n h a m S t Barrows Rd 78th AveDurham Rd Wall StKing CityFonner StFonner St Hall BoulevardHall BoulevardWatkins AvenueWatkins AvenueAsh AvenueAsh AvenueF a n n o C r e e k T r a i l F a n n o C r e e k T r a i lWe s t S i d e R e g i o n a l T r a i lWe s t S i d e R e g i o n a l T r a i l North Dakota StNorth Dakota St Sattler StSattler St Summerfield DrSummerfield Dr Cook Park Greenbelt Cook Park Greenbelt Ki-A-Kuts Bicycle & Pedestrian Bridge Ki-A-Kuts Bicycle & Pedestrian Bridge Murdock StMurdock St 5 217 99 Planned Bike Network Figure 8 0 1 2½Miles N Railroad City of Tigard Transit Center Water School Park Major Street Bikeway Neighborhood Greenway Trail Proposed Active Transportation Connection Highway 217 Crossing (location TBD) Existing FeaturesPlanned Bike Network Existing Trail Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 53 4.6. Transit Plan Transit service is an important part of a balanced transportation system, providing an alternative to private automobile travel for distances too far to walk or bike. TriMet is the primary transit service provider in the City of Tigard, although the City is also served by Yamhill County Transit. The City’s partnership with TriMet is essential to developing a more comprehensive transit system. Tigard can also play a direct role in improving transit service by providing facilities that support transit use, such as transit stop amenities, transit supportive roadway treatment such as queue jumps and dedicated transit-only lanes, and strong pedestrian connections. Additionally, the City may choose to seek alternative services to provide local and on- demand micro transit options for Tigard residents. Supporting an environment in which transit is a preferred travel option for the Tigard community requires more than direct investments in transit service. Land use, connectivity, and streetscape features have a major influence on the effectiveness of transit service and will help the Tigard community get more out of its available transit investments. For this reason, potential local strategies to improve transit service include planning for land uses that are transit supportive, in addition to providing appropriate facilities and connections to transit. 4.6.1. Existing Transit System The public transit system in Tigard consists of mainly fixed route buses, along with commuter rail and paratransit services. As shown in Figure 9, transit service is currently concentrated in the north section of the City and along Pacific Highway, with two Transit Centers and two Park and Rides lots within the City’s boundary. The southeastern and southwestern sections of Tigard lack transit service, especially through the single-family residential neighborhoods. The locations with the highest boardings and alightings occur at the Transit Centers, including the highest instances of paratransit boardings. 4.6.1.1. Transit Centers There are two transit centers in Tigard – the Tigard Transit Center and the Washington Square Transit Center. The Tigard TC also doubles as a Park & Ride location and is served by seven bus lines and the Westside Express Service (WES) Commuter Rail, along with the Yamhill County Transit routes 44/44x connecting to McMinnville. The transit center has 103 park and ride spaces and secure bike parking. The Washington Square TC is located on the north side of the Washington Square Mall. Six TriMet routes stop at the transit center. These transit hubs are locations for transfers between different buses and create connections for travelers accessing other cities in the region. This also supports the high number of workers that live in Tigard but work outside of Tigard, and those trying Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 54 to access the commercial and retail services in Downtown Tigard and Washington Square Mall. !!p !p !!p !!p !p !!p !X 99W 217 5 Taylors Ferry Rd 72nd AveTiedeman AveNorth Dakota St B e e f B e n d R d Locust St GreenburgRd Mcdonald St Walnut St Dartmouth S t Gaarde St 68th Ave121stAveHunzikerRd Tigard St Hall Blvd150thAvePfaffle St 135thAveS c h o l l s F e r r y R d Roshak Rd 68thPkwy80th AveOak St Durham Rd 85th AveRoy Rogers RdBonita RdBull M ount ain Rd SequoiaPkwyBarrows Rd 78th AveWall StFigure 9 Existing Transit 0 1 2½Miles TriMet Transit Peak Hour Frequent Regular Yamhill County Transit TriMet WES Commuter Rail Transit Center !!p Park-and-Ride !X WES Station Tigard City Boundary N !92 !38 !94 !94 !12 !64 !62 !76 !78 !78 !38 !45 !45 !45 !43 !78 !92 !92 !45 !62 !93 !96 !96 !76 !76 !43 !92 !62 Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 56 4.6.1.2. Park & Ride Along with the transit centers there are two Park & Ride lots in Tigard for TriMet patrons. The Christ the King Lutheran Church Park & Ride, located near the intersection of Pacific Highway and SW Bull Mountain Road, has 30 parking spaces and is available Monday through Friday serving TriMet routes 93 and 94. The Tigard Park & Ride is located near Pacific Highway and SW 74th Avenue. It has 220 parking spaces, bike racks, and serves routes 12, 64, and 94. While not within the Tigard Planning Area, there are two Park & Ride locations on the edge of the City boundary that likely serve Tigard residents. The Progress Park & Ride lot is located in Beaverton at the intersection of Scholls Ferry Road and Highway 217, and the Tualatin Park & Ride lot is located where SW 72nd Avenue intersects with Bridgeport Road. 4.6.1.3. LIFT Paratransit Along with its fixed bus and light rail routes, TriMet offers LIFT paratransit service to eligible riders within their service district. These are shared rides in smaller vehicles that take riders directly from their pickup location to their drop off location, though there may be stops in between to pick up or drop off other riders. LIFT service is available throughout Tigard. It runs during the same hours and days as TriMet bus service and must be scheduled in advance. Riders must show that they qualify for LIFT service due to a medical need, and LIFT ridership is about one percent of the annual boarding rides. 4.6.1.4. Ride Connection Ride Connection is a private non-profit organization that helps to provide trips to seniors, low income individuals, and individuals with disabilities. They provide free demand responsive transportation that serves residents throughout the region, and they rely on volunteers and partnerships with community organizations to provide these rides. In 2019, over 30 percent of rides were for medical reasons, 19 percent were for support services, and 18 percent were to access groceries or food services. Ride Connection also operates four first-last mile shuttles in Washington County, and provides travel training services to over 300 individuals per year. Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 57 4.6.1.5. Transit Quality of Service Fixed route transit can be evaluated by its quality of service. Three measures were used to evaluate transit service in Tigard:  Service Frequency – how often the bus arrives at each stop  Service Span - the hours of operation for a route  Service Coverage - the area within walking distance of transit service The two frequent routes that serve Tigard, 12 and 76, have the highest service frequency and span. Others, such as routes 78 and 93, have high service span but lower frequency. Overall, the transit service coverage area reaches 49 percent of Tigard’s total population and 87 percent of jobs. Transportation disadvantaged populations in Tigard include minorities, low-income residents, and seniors. The transit service area reaches 46 percent of the City’s non-white population, 46 percent of seniors, and 61 percent of those living in poverty. While this is fairly similar to the percentage of the total population served by transit in Tigard, it still means that there are many residents without convenient access to bus service. Without access to the bus system, this population is thus more dependent on cars to reach jobs and services, which is either a financial burden or makes access infeasible for youth, seniors, or those with disabilities. 4.6.2. Transit Network Future Needs While the City of Tigard does not operate the fixed route transit system and thus cannot directly control the fixed route bus and rail operations, the City has the ability to support transit service on its streets and advocate for community transit needs with TriMet. Additionally, the City may choose to seek additional services, such as Ride Connection, to provide local and on-demand micro transit options for Tigard residents. Ride Connection currently operates four first-last mile shuttles in Washington County and a similar service model could be explored for Tigard. Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 58 4.6.2.1. Transit Access and Frequency Considerations Tigard is served by regular, peak hour, and frequent bus service as well as commuter rail. However, only half of Tigard residents live within walking distance of a bus stop, and this percentage declines for non-white and senior residents. Pacific Highways and the north and east sides of the city are the most well served by transit. Several of the City’s major corridors (Roy Rogers Road, Barrows Road, Walnut Street, Gaarde Street, Bull Mountain Road, and Durham Road) lack transit service altogether. The lack of transit service can make key destinations such as River Terrace, Progress Ridge shopping center, Cook Park, and Tigard High School inaccessible to those without regular access to a car. 4.6.2.2. Congestion Impacts on Transit Delay The corridors with the highest transit ridership are among the most congested roadways. While roadway congestion is an issue for all modes, the increased travel time for transit riders can pose a barrier to attracting new riders. In some cases, operational improvements can be made to reduce transit delay, such as traffic signals with queue bypass functions, or dedicated acceleration lanes for buses to reenter the general travel lanes. TriMet has developed analysis showing levels of congestion on current transit routes. In Tigard, these include Greenburg Road approaching the Washington Square Regional Center and Pacific Highway north of Downtown Tigard, connecting to Portland. 4.6.2.3. Potential New Transit Service There are large areas of Tigard that are not served by TriMet fixed route service. These tend to be lower density residential neighborhoods where new fixed route service is not likely to meet TriMet’s thresholds for new service. TriMet’s Southwest Service Enhancement Plan (SWSEP) noted the potential for using pass-through federal funding to support more local service such as Ride Connection to fill these gaps. In addition to federal funding, Oregon House Bill 2017 established new funding for public transportation. The Statewide Transportation Improvement Fund (STIF) is administered by ODOT and may provide additional resources to augment existing transit service. 4.6.3. Planned Transit Network The City of Tigard has the opportunity to support transit service on its street and advocate for community transit needs with TriMet. Additionally, the City may choose to seek additional services, such as Ride Connection, to provide demand responsive or on-demand micro-transit services for Tigard residents. Improvements to transit can be categorized as: Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 59  Increasing the frequency or the coverage of existing service,  Improving the reliability of service,  Maximizing rider comfort while waiting at a transit stop,  Increasing access to transit stops and first/last mile considerations, and  Implementing land use strategies to support Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) The network strategies described below discuss how Tigard can either directly or indirectly improve and enhance transit in the City. 4.6.3.1. Transit Service Improvements Fixed Route Service Tigard can work with TriMet to identify areas that may benefit from new or improved fixed route service. In 2018, the Portland Bureau of Transportation, in coordination with TriMet, published the Enhanced Transit Corridors (ETC) Plan, which looks to improve transit capacity, reliability, and travel time on key routes through capital and operational treatments of moderate cost. Tigard could build on the work in the ETC plan to identify transit corridors in Tigard to receive priority for capital improvements. Alternative Transit Some areas of Tigard may not have the density needed to support a fixed route bus service. In these areas alternative transit services such as on- demand service organized through an app or small circulator shuttles that pick up and drop off at key destinations could fill the gap in transit service. Tigard can partner with agencies such as Ride Connection (currently operating in Tigard and the Metro region) to offer expanded on-demand transit or microtransit services for seniors and people with disabilities in areas that are not currently served by TriMet. There may also be opportunities to pilot new and expanded alternative transit services for the general population. 4.6.3.2. Transit Bottleneck Improvements Congestion and delay on the roadways affect not only people traveling in personal vehicles but transit vehicles and their passengers. Tigard owns and maintains many of the roadways in the City and can make improvements such as transit signal priority, bus queue jumps, or bus-only lanes to decrease those bottlenecks. For ODOT or county- owned roadways such as Pacific Highway or Scholls Ferry Road, Tigard can partner with these agencies to promote congestion relief projects on transit routes. Projects that decrease delay and help to relieve congestion on key transit corridors make transit a more reliable and feasible travel option for residents. Tigard plans to work with TriMet to identify bottleneck locations affecting major transit routes in the City and identify projects to improve transit reliability and travel time. Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 60 4.6.3.3. Transit Amenities Many of the transit stops in the City could benefit from new or improved amenities such as benches, shelters, and lighting. Improving these amenities can increase rider comfort while waiting for the bus, potentially increasing ridership. Updating amenities is also an opportunity for Tigard to partner with TriMet, as transit stops tend to be located in the City’s right-of-way. 4.6.3.4. Access to Transit and First/Last Mile Connections Increasing access to transit involves building out the bicycle and pedestrian networks, including sidewalks, bike facilities, and crossings, to provide complete and safe infrastructure for all residents, regardless of age or ability, to get to transit stops. Often these access improvements are focused on the areas directly around transit stops to provide safe and comfortable connections destinations. These first/last mile connection improvements remove barriers that could prevent travelers from taking transit. 4.6.3.5. Transit Oriented Development Transit Oriented Development (TOD) is a set of land use strategies to support transit use and access, especially around major stations or transit centers. These strategies support planning and design decisions by TriMet, private development, and the City that will allow TOD to thrive around stations and enable the city to achieve its land use vision. Some example TOD strategies include encouraging more dense retail and residential development around a transit station, smaller block sizes, provisions for affordable housing, and building infrastructure to encourage non-auto travel modes. Tigard already has a TOD Project Charter with TriMet to describe efforts they will take to facilitate TOD around light rail stations in Tigard consistent with the City’s strategic vision. Figure 10 shows the transit network for the 2040 TSP. Key elements of this network include:  Frequent Transit Routes/TOD Priority Areas: These are routes or TOD areas that will accommodate high frequency transit, including both bus and rail.  Continuous Transit Service Corridors: These are streets where the City would like Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 61 to see TriMet provide continuous transit service (whether or not they do today).  On-Demand Service Areas: These are areas of the City that do not have the land use to support traditional fixed route service, but where provision of on-demand services such as neighborhood shuttles would help community needs, particularly those with fewer mobility options. Strategies for Tigard to improve service, reliability, amenities, and access for each of these components of the transit network are summarized in Table 5. Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 62 Table 5. Transit Network STRATEGY PERFORMANCE MEASURE POTENTIAL PROJECTS/ACTIONS Tier 1: Frequent Transit Routes and TOD Priority Areas Support frequent and reliable service. Strive for average travel speed along key transit routes.  Speed and reliability treatments, such as transit signal priority and queue jumps  Advocate for increased service/reduced headways Strive to maximize rider comfort. Stop amenities.  City investments in comfort/amenities at major stops; e.g., lighting; seating; comfortable shelters; real time transit information Strive to maximize rider access. Number of people that can access stops on a low stress network.  Sidewalks/trails connecting to stops  Enhanced street crossings  Bike parking  Curb space management considerations  Prioritize TOD over park and ride Tier 2: Areas Where Regular Transit Service is Desired Support continuous service. Strive for continuous service, based on hours/day and days/week; minimum headways  Advocate for continuous service Strive to maximize rider comfort. Stop amenities.  City investments in comfort/amenities at major stops; e.g., lighting; seating; comfortable shelters Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 63 STRATEGY PERFORMANCE MEASURE POTENTIAL PROJECTS/ACTIONS Strive to maximize rider access. Number of people that can access stops on a low stress network.  Sidewalks/trails connecting to stops.  Enhanced street crossings. Tier 3: On-Demand Service Needs Support on-demand service. Percent of priority populations with access to on-demand or fixed-route service.  Advocate for on-demand service that meets community needs.  Support on-demand service that is equitable (well publicized, accessible to people of all ages/all abilities)  Partner to support affordable service. !!p !!p !!p !!p !!p !!p 99W 217 5 Taylors Ferry Rd 121stAveTiedemanAve72nd AveB e e f B e n d R d GreenburgRd Mcdonald St Walnut St Dartmouth S t Gaarde St 68th AveHunzikerRd Hall Blvd150thAvePfaffle St 135thAve68thPkwy80th AveOak St Durham Rd 85th AveRoy Rogers RdBonita RdBull M ount ain Rd SequoiaPkwyBarrow sR d 78th AveWall StPlanned Transit Network 0 1 2½Miles Planned Transit Network Frequent Transit Routes and TOD Priority Areas Areas Where Regular Transit Service is Desired On Demand Service N eeds Southwest C orridor Existing Elements Transit Center !!p Park-and-Ride TriMet WES Commuter Rail N !94 !94 !12 !64 !62 !76 !78 !78 !38 !45 !45 !43 !78 !92 !45 !62 !93 !96 !76 !76 Figure 10 !43 Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 65 4.7. Motor Vehicle Plan The street network serves as the backbone of Tigard’s multi-modal transportation system. These facilities must accommodate many travel modes within their rights of way, with users’ experience also shaped by the surrounding land use. Overall, the roadway network is intended to be multimodal, serving auto, freight, and transit needs, as well as people walking and riding bicycles. 4.7.1. Existing Motor Vehicle Network Streets in Tigard are owned and maintained by ODOT, Washington County, and the City. They are designed to fit the purpose that they serve, generally ranging from longer distance mobility to neighborhood circulation to direct access. Their characteristics, including functional class, speed, number of lanes, and intersection treatments, should match the intended use of the facility. 4.7.1.1. Functional class The street network in Tigard is a mix of arterials that accommodate higher volumes and speeds to promote regional mobility and local roads oriented 6 https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/national_highway_system/ 7 Seismic Lifeline Routes are roadways and bridges that play a critical role in emergency response and evacuation in the event of a seismic event. https://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Planning/Documents/Seismic-Lifelines-Evaluation- Vulnerability-Synthese-Identification.pdf to internal circulation. Tigard has multiple access points to I-5 and Highway 217, which connect to the rest of the region. The functional classes in Tigard are shown in Table 6 and Figure 11. Figure 12 identifies the roadways that currently have 4-5 lanes and locations where there is planned widening. Title 18 of Tigard’s Municipal Code (Development Code), developed by the City Engineering Department, identifies the design standards for roadway cross-section elements based on the street functional class. These standards are currently under revision and being updated. I-5, Highway 217, Pacific Highway, and Scholls Ferry Road are designated by the FHWA as part of the National Highway System (NHS). The federal government defines the NHS as roads important to the nation’s economy, defense, and mobility 6 and thus emphasizes the importance of maintaining vehicle mobility. I-5, Highway 217, and Pacific Highway are also lifeline 7 routes and future planning for these routes will be consistent with the Oregon Resiliency Plan. SW Hall Boulevard, currently under state jurisdiction, is under consideration for a jurisdictional transfer to the City of Tigard. This transfer would enable the City to establish its own Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 66 vision for SW Hall Boulevard, including its functional classification designation, design standards, and performance expectations. At the same time, this transfer would require the City to take over responsibility for maintenance and the associated expenses. Hall Boulevard from Scholls Ferry Road to SW Hemlock Street is currently designated by ODOT as a Special Transportation Area, meaning that the need for appropriate local access in this area outweighs the considerations of highway mobility, and there is a focus on planning this section of the state highway to accommodate non- auto modes and local circulation. Downtown Tigard has special street designations and a plan to build out the street grid to increase connectivity. A map of these designations can be found in the Technical Appendix. Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 67 Table 6. Classifications of Roadway ROADWAY TYPE DESCRIPTION / PURPOSE EXAMPLE PHOTO Interstate Interstates primarily serve long distance travel between cities and carry high volumes. They provide only limited access via grade separation and access ramps. I-5 OR 217 Principal Arterial Principal arterials tend to carry the highest volumes of any roadway type below interstate routes. They can potentially serve regional through trips and connect the region. Mobility is a priority on principal arterials and access control is important. OR 99W Arterial Arterials are designed for higher volumes, but tend not to be major regional travel ways. Minor arterial streets provide inter-neighborhood connections. Hall Boulevard Durham Road Collectors Collectors distribute trips between local streets and arterials and serve as transition roadways to or from commercial and residential areas. Collectors have lower volumes than arterials, and must balance experience for all modes. 135th Avenue Locust Street Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 68 ROADWAY TYPE DESCRIPTION / PURPOSE EXAMPLE PHOTO Neighborhood Streets Neighborhood streets serve a similar purpose to Collectors, however they are distinguished by having lower traffic volumes and more connecting driveways. Neighborhood streets offer more access at lower speed and with fewer travel lanes. North Dakota Street Sattler Street Local Streets Local streets are the lowest functional classification, providing circulation and access within residential neighborhoods. They provide access to homes and properties, and serve a slower-moving mix of modes. SW 88th Avenue Photo Credit: Google Maps, 2021 99W 217 5 Taylors Ferry Rd 72nd AveTiedeman AveNorth Dakota St B e e f B e n d R d Locust St GreenburgRd Mcdonald St Walnut St Dartmouth S t Gaarde St 68th Ave121stAveHunzikerRd Tigard St Hall Blvd150thAvePfaffle St 135thAveS c h o l l s F e r r y R d Roshak Rd 68thPkwy80th AveOak St Durham Rd 85th AveRoy Rogers RdBonita RdBull M o u nt ain Rd SequoiaPkwyB urn h a m St Barrows Rd 78th AveWall StFigure 11 Tigard Functional Classifications 0 1 2½Miles Roadway Classification Freeway Principal Arterial Arterial Collector Neighborhood Special Transportation Area Planned Connections Local Collector Neighborhood Tigard City Boundary N 99W 217 5 Taylors Ferry Rd 72nd AveTiedeman AveNorth Dakota St B e e f B e n d R d Locust St GreenburgRd Mcdonald St Walnut St Dartmouth S t Gaarde St 68th Ave121stAveHunzikerRd Tigard St Hall Blvd150thAvePfaffle St 135thAveS c h o l l s F e r r y R d Roshak Rd 68thPkwy80th AveOak St Durham Rd 85th AveRoy Rogers RdBonita RdBull M o u nt ain Rd SequoiaPkwyB urn h a m St Barrows Rd 78th AveWall StFigure 12 Planned Roadway Widenings 0 1 2½Miles Existing 4-5 Lane Roads Principal Arterial Arterial Collector Planned Widenings to 4-5 Lanes Planned Widenings to 6-7 Lanes Tigard City Boundary N Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 71 4.7.1.2. Access Management The Oregon Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) defines “Access Management” as “…measures regulating access to streets, roads and highways from public roads and private driveways.” A requirement of the TPR is that new connections to both arterials and state highways must follow designated access management categories. Typically, existing accesses can remain as long as the land use does not change. In general, access management standards require more spacing for higher capacity roadways. However, the specific spacing value may vary by jurisdiction and agency. The City of Tigard’s access spacing standards are found in Chapter 18.920.030 of the Tigard Development Code. Washington County has access standards which are established in the Washington County Community Development Code, in Section 501-8.5(A). Projects being considered on County facilities such as Scholls Ferry Road will need to refer to these standards. The Oregon Highway Plan (OHP) includes access management spacing standards for ODOT highways. Hall Boulevard and Pacific Highway are under ODOT management and must follow OHP standards. 4.7.1.3. Traffic Operations The evaluation of existing traffic conditions focused on daily volumes along key corridors in Tigard, along with 30th highest hour operations at 30 intersections in the City. Outside of I-5 and Highway 217, Pacific Highway and Scholls Ferry Road carry the highest volumes in Tigard. Most of the City’s other high volume streets are designated as arterials, indicating that they are built to accommodate the traffic volumes they carry. There are exceptions, however: Dartmouth Street is a collector that carries 13,000 ADT and Sattler Street and SW 98th Avenue are local streets that carry high enough volumes to be considered for an upgrade in their functional classification. Of the 30 intersections studied, ten study intersections have an LOS E or F, indicating high amounts of delay. These are spread across the City, with several on SW Tiedeman Avenue, Main Street, and 72nd Avenue. Seven intersections exceed a v/c ratio of 0.99:  SW Greenburg Road & SW Tiedeman Avenue  SW 121st Avenue & SW North Dakota Street  SW Tiedeman Avenue & SW North Dakota Street  SW Tiedeman Avenue & SW Tigard Street  SW Walnut Street & SW Gaarde Street  SW Hall Boulevard & SW McDonald Street  SW Durham Road & SW Hall Boulevard Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 72 4.7.1.4. Freight Freight movement is essential to bring goods to residents and to move products throughout the region. Tigard, Washington County, and ODOT all designate freight routes, as shown in Figure 13. This system provides connections with truck routes serving areas within and outside of Tigard making efficient truck movement and the delivery of raw materials, goods, services, and finished products possible. Freight routes are designated to identify where improvements may be needed for the safe and efficient movement of trucks and to minimize negative impacts on local streets. 99W 217 5 Taylors Ferry Rd 72nd AveTiedeman AveNorth Dakota St B e e f B e n d R d Locust St GreenburgRd Mcdonald St Walnut St Dartmouth S t Gaarde St 68th Ave121stAveHunzikerRd Tigard St Hall Blvd150thAvePfaffle St 135thAveS c h o l l s F e r r y R d Roshak Rd 68thPkwy80th AveOak St Durham Rd 85th AveRoy Rogers RdBonita RdBull Mountain Rd SequoiaPkwyB u r n h a m S t Barrows Rd 78th AveWall StFigure 13 Tigard Designated Freight Routes 0 1 2½Miles Truck Route Railroad Tigard City Boundary N Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 74 4.7.1.5. Safety In evaluating the performance of Tigard’s street network, it is important to consider this performance from a safety perspective. The collision data and analysis discussed here is derived from Tigard’s 2019 Transportation Safety Action Plan (TSAP). The TSAP used data from ODOT, Metro, TriMet, and the City of Tigard collected between 2013 and 2017. The analysis does not include collisions on freeway mainline segments and ramp segments. Compared to the State of Oregon and ODOT Region 1 averages, collisions at intersections and collisions involving pedestrians or bicyclists are overrepresented in Tigard as shown in Table 7. In contrast, collisions attributed to roadway departure or speeding are underrepresented. This is likely due to the more urban nature of Tigard’s streets compared to roadways statewide or even across ODOT Region 1. Table 7. Fatal and Injury Collisions by Attribute CRASH ATTRIBUTE CITY OF TIGARD (2013-2017) OREGON STATEWIDE (2009-2013) ODOT REGION 1 (2009-2013) Roadway Departure 22% 54% 37% Intersection 54% 34% 45% Speeding 11% 27% 21% Alcohol and/or Other Drug Use 20% 22% 21% Motorcycle 12% 15% 14% Pedestrian 25% 10% 14% Bicyclist 15% 4% 6% Source: Tigard TSAP 2019 Over half of collisions (and 60% of fatal and severe injury collisions) in Tigard occurred at intersections with at least one arterial or principal arterial roadway. The collision analysis identified 20 priority intersections, based on collision occurrence. Of these 20 priority intersections, 12 are located on Pacific Highway, and four are on Scholls Ferry Road. Overall, collision rates have remained stable between 2013 and 2017, with no substantial temporal trend discernable. Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 75 4.7.2. Future Motor Vehicle Needs Key challenges on Tigard’s roadway system were identified through the existing and future conditions analyses: operational constraints, inconsistencies between streets’ classification and function, areas where connectivity is lacking, and how to address parking in the Tigard Triangle. 4.7.2.1. Traffic Operations By 2040, it is expected that 18 of the 30 study intersections will have LOS E or F operations during the 30th highest hour volume and 17 intersections will exceed a v/c ratio of 0.99, indicating high amounts of delay. These intersections were evaluated for potential mitigations, including projects that were identified in the 2010 TSP, and included on the TSP project list. The future traffic analysis can be reviewed in more detail in the Technical Appendix. 4.7.2.2. Street Classifications Several streets in Tigard that carry consistently higher volumes than their functional classification would suggest (see Table 8). The City should consider appropriate classifications for these roadways, including potential adjustments to design and operating characteristics. The TSP reclassifies some of the roadways whose function has changed since the last TSP. These include 85th Avenue south of Durham Road, 92nd Avenue, and 90th Avenue. Table 8. Streets Carry Higher Volumes than Functional Classification Guidance COLLECTORS WITH >6,500 ADT LOCAL AND NEIGHBORHOOD ROADS CARRYING 3,750-6,500 ADT  SW Dartmouth Street  SW 68th Avenue  SW Hunziker Street  SW Tiedeman Avenue  SW 121st Avenue  SW Main Street  SW Bull Mountain Road  SW Sequoia Parkway (south of SW Bonita Road)  SW Durham Road (south of Upper Boones Ferry)  SW North Dakota Street (121st Avenue to Tiedeman Avenue)  SW Tigard Street (Tiedeman Avenue to Main Street)  SW Beveland Street (72nd Avenue to 68th Avenue)  SW 69th Avenue  SW Sattler Street (98th Avenue to Hall Boulevard)  SW 98th Avenue (Durham Road to Sattler Avenue) Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 76 4.7.2.3. Speed Limit Considerations Nine street sections in Tigard were identified that have posted speed limits that may be inconsistent with their functional classification (Table 9). This TSP also identifies the intention to reduce posted speeds to no higher than 35 mph on City-owned facilities, and a citywide expansion of 20 mph speed zones on all local and high- priority neighborhood streets. Posted speed limits are not based solely on the functional class, but consider operational factors such as roadway width, surface, lanes, shoulders, signals, intersections, roadside development, parking, accidents and 85th percentile speed. Further, changes in posted speed limits require ODOT approval so this TSP identifies these roadways to inform future deliberations, coordination with the County, and potential requests to ODOT for approval of speed reductions. Table 9. Streets for Consideration of Speed Limit Change STREET EXTENT FUNCTIONAL CLASS POSTED SPEED RECOMMENDED SPEED1 Bull Mountain Road2 All sections within City limits Collector 40 35 66th Avenue Hampton Street to end Local 45 20 Sattler Street 94th Avenue to Hall Boulevard Neighborhood 35 20 Tigard Street Main Street to Twin Park Place Neighborhood 35 20 Pfaffle Street Pacific Highway to 78th Avenue Local 35 20 Hampton Street 68th Avenue to 66th Avenue Local 35 20 Commercial Street Main Street to Hall Boulevard Local 30 20 SW 135th Avenue Scholls Ferry Rd to Walnut St Collector 40 35 Hall Boulevard3 Pfaffle Street to northern City limits Arterial 40 35 1 This is a planning level assessment only and would need to be further explored through a speed study and discussion with ODOT. 2 Some sections of Bull Mountain Road are owned by Washington County 3 Currently owned by ODOT, under consideration for jurisdictional transfer to the City of Tigard Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 77 Outside of speed limit reductions, the City can also manage speeds on local roads through establishment of a neighborhood traffic calming program. This program (discussed further in Chapter 6) would identify locations where traffic calming is needed and the appropriate solutions to slow traffic speeds. 4.7.2.4. Freight Freight and commerce are essential to the economic vibrancy of Tigard. While critical to the City’s success, freight traffic in and through Tigard can present challenges to the City’s transportation system. Conflicts between freight and other modes (walking, bicycling, transit, and personal vehicles) along Tigard’s most heavily travelled freight corridors pose safety and efficiency concerns. Non-freight specific transportation projects should be aware of freight system needs and implement solutions that accommodate freight movement. The current freight network classifications generally reflect the needs for access to commercial and industrial areas, as well as major transportation connections. Minor updates are recommended that are consistent with this purpose, and that would bring Tigard’s classification into consistency with Washington County: a freight designation on SW Roy Rogers Road and on SW 72nd Avenue south of Highway 217. 4.8. TDM and TSMO Plan 8 Metro. TDM Inventory Needs and Opportunities Assessment. August 2019. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSMO) are two strategies to enhance the existing transportation system without major capital expansion. TDM is focused on reducing vehicle demand while TSMO is focused on making the current system more efficient. 4.8.1. Transportation Demand Management TDM programs aim to reduce the use of single- occupancy vehicles and promote active modes of transportation. Many TDM programs are employer- based and can consist of incentives such as free transit passes, infrastructure such as secure bicycle parking, employee education programs on transportation choices, or site changes such as reduced parking. The Westside Transportation Alliance is a Transportation Management Association in Washington County that works with both employers and local governments to encourage behavior change for commute trips and provide transportation options. The TPR requires jurisdictions to take steps to reduce single-occupancy vehicle use. TDM measures can help to accomplish these goals. Metro recently completed a TDM Inventory 8 that assessed the needs and opportunities for TDM programs throughout the Metro region. Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 78 4.8.1.1. TDM Strategies TDM measures include any method intended to shift travel demand from single occupant vehicles to non- auto modes or carpooling, or travel at less congested times of the day. Some common examples of TDM strategies include programs such as carpool matching assistance or flexible work shifts; parking management strategies; direct financial incentives such as transit subsidies; or facility or service improvements, such as bicycle lockers or increased bus service. Some of the most effective TDM strategies are best implemented by employers and are aimed at encouraging non-SOV commuting. Strategies include preferential carpool parking, subsidized transit passes, and flexible work schedules. Telework, which only a small share of workers had access to before the COVID-19 pandemic, is becoming a more viable part- or full-time working situation. Many employers are rethinking their policies around work from home, and if there is greater adoption pre-pandemic it could reduce peak hour commute trips. Cities and other public agencies can play a critical role in support of TDM through provision of facilities and services, as well as development policies that encourage TDM. 4.8.2. Transportation Systems Management and Operations TSMO is a coordinated set of measures to both maintain and improve the operations of existing facilities. Some TSMO strategies include access management, traffic signal coordination, real-time traveler information, and incident management teams. While Tigard does not have a City-specific TSMO document, Metro is currently updating their Regional TSMO Plan. The Metro 2021 TSMO Plan has six goals: Free from Harm, Regional Collaboration, Eliminate Disparities, Reliable Travel Choices, Connected Travel Choices, and Prepare for Change. It identifies regional actions and performance measures to track the operational improvements over time. Figure from the 2021 TSMO Strategy 4.8.2.1. TSMO Solutions TSMO refers to a wide range of strategies that improve the operations of an existing roadway system to make it more efficient without roadway widening. TSMO measures are focused on improving transportation “supply” through enhancing efficiency, typically with technologies to improve traffic operations. Several TSMO strategies are identified for application in Tigard in existing plans, including Metro’s 2010 TSMO Plan. Some Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 79 of the key strategies identified for consideration in Tigard are summarized below. 4.8.2.2. Signal Retiming/Optimization Signal retiming and optimization refers to updating timing plans to better match prevailing traffic conditions and coordinating signals. Timing optimization can be applied to existing systems or may include upgrading signal technology, including signal communication infrastructure or signal controllers or cabinets. Signal retiming can reduce travel times and be especially beneficial to improving travel time reliability. Signal retiming could also be implemented to improve or facilitate pedestrian movements through intersections by increasing minimum green times to accommodate pedestrian crossing movements during each cycle in high pedestrian or desired pedestrian traffic areas, eliminating the need to push pedestrian crossing buttons. Bicycle movements could be facilitated by installing bicycle detection along major bicycle routes. Signal upgrades often come at a higher cost and usually require further coordination between jurisdictions. 4.8.2.3. Advanced Signal Systems Advanced signal systems incorporate various strategies in signal operations to improve the efficiency of a transportation network. Strategies may include coordinated signal operations across jurisdictions as well as centralized control of traffic signals. Advanced signal systems can reduce delay, travel time, and the number of stops for vehicles, while potentially increasing average vehicle speed. In addition, these systems may help reduce vehicle emissions and have a high impact on improving travel time reliability. Of the 95 signals in the City of Tigard, 25 are owned by Tigard but maintained by Washington County; the rest are owned by either Washington County or ODOT. These agencies would take the lead in signal upgrades and implementing advanced signal systems. Any strategies that may be implemented would require coordination among the City of Tigard and the jurisdictions that own and operate the signals. There are six key coordinated systems within the City. These are:  Pacific Highway throughout the City;  72nd Avenue between Highway 217 southbound ramps and Hampton Street;  Scholls Ferry Road throughout the City;  Durham Road;  Greenburg Road between Highway 217 southbound ramps and Locust Street; and,  Upper Boones Ferry Road between Sequoia Parkway and Durham Road. Coordinated signal systems enhance the capacity of an existing system through improvements in operations, rather than widening. 4.8.2.4. Real-time Traveler Information Traveler information consists of collecting and disseminating real-time transportation system information to the traveling public. This includes information on traffic and road conditions, transit arrival and scheduling, general public transportation and Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 80 parking information, interruptions due to roadway incidents, roadway maintenance and construction, and weather conditions. Traveler information is collected from transit vehicles, roadway sensors, traffic cameras, vehicle probes and, devices such as cell phones or laptops. Data from these sources are sent to a central system and subsequently disseminated to the public so that drivers can track conditions specific to their route and can provide historical and real-time traffic conditions for travelers. When roadway travelers are supplied with information on their trips, they may be able to avoid heavy congestion by altering a travel path, delaying the start of a trip, or changing which mode they choose to use. This can reduce overall delay and fuel emissions. Transit information systems enhance passenger convenience and may increase the attractiveness of transit to the public by encouraging travelers to consider transit as opposed to driving alone. Traveler information projects can be prioritized over increasing capacity on roadway, often with high project visibility among the public. 4.9. Rail, Water, Air, and Pipeline Plan There are a number of other transportation modes that are present in and around Tigard. The City has rail lines and pipelines that pass through it, access to waterways such as the Tualatin River, and an airport within driving distance. 4.9.1. Existing Rail Network A Portland and Western Railroad (PNWR) line passes through Tigard, parallel to Highway 217. Along this line operates the WES Commuter Rail, which is owned by TriMet and operated by PNWR, and has a stop at the Tigard Transit Center. At-grade railroad crossings are a potential conflict point between trains and vehicles, bicycles, or pedestrians. They can be a safety concern and can cause delays and operational concerns when traffic must stop for train traffic. There are nine at-grade railroad crossings in Tigard:  SW Scholls Ferry Road south of SW Cascade Avenue  SW North Dakota Street west of SW Tiedeman Avenue  SW Tiedeman Avenue south of SW North Dakota Street  SW Main Street west of SW Commercial Street  SW Hall Boulevard south of SW Commercial Street  SW Bonita Road west of SW 72nd Avenue  SW 72nd Avenue north of SW Kable Lane  SW Upper Boones Ferry Road west of SW Sequoia Parkway  SW Durham Road north of Upper Boones Ferry Road There are no Amtrak passenger terminals within the city limits. The nearest passenger terminal is Union Station in Portland. Union Station is approximately 12 miles north of Tigard via Pacific Highway and I-5. Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 81 4.9.1.1. Rail Network Future Needs In several locations, the existing rail lines are barriers for existing access, project design, and new connections. Some related issues have been identified by existing plans or project design issues. Typically, rail lines have limited crossings and even these few crossings are blocked, at times, by trains. Key identified rail needs include:  The North Dakota Street/Tiedeman Avenue/Greenburg Road intersection area includes two closely spaced rail crossings of the roadways. A circulation study is included on the TSP project list to evaluate the operations in this area, including the railroad crossings.  The Upper Boones Ferry Road/Durham Road intersection is frequently congested and forecast 2040 demand will exceed its capacity. The rail line crosses Durham Road approximately 350 feet west of Upper Boones Ferry Road. Widening the road at an existing rail crossing is not generally advised. As such, the proximity to the rail line, coupled with the need to provide safe access to adjacent commercial property, is a challenging factor in developing alternatives. A circulation study is included on the TSP project list that would include analysis of the railroad crossings.  Ash Avenue would benefit from a connection across the railroad tracks from Burnham to Commercial Street to increase connectivity in Downtown Tigard. A grade-separated crossing at this location is included on the TSP project list.  Plans for the Red Rock Creek Trail include a pedestrian railroad overcrossing near Wall Street.  Extension of the Tigard Street Heritage Trail include a railroad undercrossing for pedestrians and bicycles west of Pacific Highway, connecting Grant Avenue with 95th Avenue. 4.9.2. Air There are no commercial airports located within the city limits. The nearest airport with commercial services is the Portland International Airport (PDX) in Portland. PDX is approximately 22 miles northeast of Tigard via I-5 and I-84. The Hillsboro Airport, which is approximately 20 miles northwest of Tigard via Highway 217 and Highway 26, provides corporate and charter flight services, as well as repair and refueling facilities. PDX and the Hillsboro Airport are the first and second busiest airports (by aircraft operations) in Oregon, respectively. Within city limits, the Lincoln Tower Heliport, located at the top of the Lincoln Center building near Highway 217 and Greenburg Road, allows landing and take-offs of helicopters between 8 A.M. and 6 P.M., and is only accessible by tenants of the Lincoln Center. Additionally, the privately-owned Meyer Riverside Airpark off Beef Bend Road contains two turf runways. There are no identified air needs or projects within Tigard. Table of Contents CHAPTER 4 MODAL PLANS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 82 4.9.3. Water The Tualatin River, a tributary of the Willamette river, runs along approximately 1.5 miles of Tigard’s southern city limits. While the Tualatin River does not support transportation, the waterway is used for recreational purposes. The only public boat launch within city limits launches into the Tualatin River, and is located at Cook Park. The City has purchased property on the west side of Roy Rogers Road for the planned Lasich City park that also has water rights access to be developed in the future, including a planned boat launch. There are no identified water access needs or projects within Tigard. 4.9.4. Pipeline A 17-mile pipeline that carries hazardous liquids (non- volatile) between Northwest Portland and North Wilsonville runs through the northwest corner of Tigard between SW Barrows Road and SW Bull Mountain Road. The pipeline is operated by SFPP, LP (a Kinder Morgan affiliate). Gas pipelines operated by Northwest Natural Gas Company also run along the north border of Tigard along Scholls Ferry Road. There are no identified pipeline needs or projects within Tigard. 2040 Transportation System Plan NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 83 Chapter 5 | Transportation Funding Tigard on the Move, the 2040 TSP, includes projects that will be entirely under the jurisdiction of the Tigard, as well as projects that would be implemented in partnership with state, county, and other local agencies. By extension, transportation capital improvements are typically funded through a combination of state, city, county, and private funds. This Chapter documents Tigard’s projected transportation revenues and resources over the life of this plan. This funding analysis informs the size of the recommended TSP project list in concert with review and input from City staff, the Technical Advisory Committee, Community Advisory Committee (CAC), as well as project list feedback solicited from the broader community. 5.1. Estimated Transportation Resources Tigard’s transportation revenues were calculated based primarily on the methods and assumptions used for the 2018 RTP financial forecast, as provided by Washington 9 The RTP forecast is expressed in 2016 dollars; annual revenues were adjusted to reflect 2021 dollars. A 1.10 factor was used to make this adjustment, based on the Consumer Price Index from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The annual revenue stream was adjusted to reflect the 19-year period from 2022 to 2040, inclusive. Minor adjustments were made based on input from City staff, such as the use of City fuel taxes and inclusion of new Urban Renewal funds. County. The 2018 RTP revenue forecast reflects the 25 years from 2016 to 2040, with relevant adjustments.9 This forecast of long-term funding capacity has been developed to inform the planning of future investments. Inclusion of funding here does not constitute an obligation or approved budget. Rather, it reflects the best available information and coordination with county and regional planning as of the publishing of this TSP. Table 10 summarizes the total anticipated revenue and resources for transportation during the 19-year planning period. As Table 10 shows, total capacity for transportation projects is expected to be just under $285 million during the life of the TSP, or $15 million annually. This estimate includes improvements made by developers (such as frontage improvements or off-site mitigation), which are established at the time of development permitting. While these development- provided improvements contribute significantly to Tigard’s overall transportation system, they cannot be counted as “revenue” received by the City. Table of Contents CHAPTER 5. TRANSPORTATION FUNDING NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 84 Table 10. Transportation Revenue/Resources Forecast (2022-2040) CAPITAL INVESTMENT OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE (O&M) TOTAL Average Annual $14,954,700 $4,263,200 $19,217,900 Total for the Planning Horizon (19 years) $284,139,300 $81,000,800 $365,140,100 The sources of transportation revenue/resources are detailed in Table 11, which shows annual average contributions for capital and O&M of city-owned transportation facilities. The table distinguishes between revenues sources that are directed by the City of Tigard (for which the City has the most control over expenditures) and non-City sources (for which the City has less discretion in how revenues are spent). The revenue/resource categories in Table 10 are described in the following section. This is followed by a list of other potential revenue sources. Table of Contents CHAPTER 5. TRANSPORTATION FUNDING NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 85 Table 11. Average Annual Transportation Revenue/Resource SOURCE ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION CAPITAL INVESTMENT OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE LOCAL SOURCES DIRECTED BY CITY OF TIGARD City Fuel Tax $715,000 - Street Maintenance Fee - $287,100 *Citywide TSDC $4,017,500 - *River Terrace TSDC $699,300 - NON-LOCAL SOURCES DIRECTED BY CITY OF TIGARD Transportation Development Tax $3,205,300 $- State highway fund $330,000 $2,970,000 County fuel tax $22,000 $198,000 Vehicle registration fee $89,800 $808,100 Ride Hailing Service License Fees $60,000 $- TOTAL CITY OF TIGARD REVENUE $9,138,900 $4,263,200 NON-CITY OF TIGARD SOURCES Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program $3,648,700 $- *HB2017 $1,618,600 $- Federal and State $608,500 $- TOTAL NON-CITY $5,875,800 $0 COMBINED LOCAL, COUNTY, STATE, FEDERAL RESOURCES $15,014,714 $4,263,157 * New since the 2010 TSP Table of Contents CHAPTER 5. TRANSPORTATION FUNDING NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 86 5.2. Revenue sources for which City has direct control over City Fuel Tax – this tax has long been an important source of transportation. Under city code (Municipal code 3.65.270) the purpose of the gas tax is “to raise revenues necessary for the construction, reconstruction, improvement, repair, maintenance, operation and use of the public street system in the city.” When adopted, the revenue was prioritized to fund improvements at the Greenburg Road/Highway 99/Main Street intersection. With that project now completed, revenues are programmed in the CIP and ultimately approved by City Council in the City’s budget. Street Maintenance Fee – this fee is assessed as a transportation utility fee and is used for street maintenance (not capital) only. Transportation System Development Charges (SDC) SDCs are contributions paid by developers to accommodate increased capacity needs associated with their projects. SDC revenues are limited to capital projects that add multimodal capacity to the system. The citywide and River Terrace SDCs are a major contributor to capital investment. As was noted earlier, these contributions may be credited to developers who construct capital projects in conjunction with development and therefore would not take the form of revenue to the city. Transportation Development Tax (TDT) – this is a voter-approved countywide tax on development that functions as a system development charge. Similar to the Tigard TSDC estimates, this TDT estimate represents revenue received as well as frontage improvements and credits for off-site improvements. State Highway Fund and County Fuel Tax – cities and counties each receive part of the 30-cents-per-gallon gas tax, large truck weight-mile fees and vehicle registration fees collected by the state. Washington County also has an added one-cent-per-gallon gas tax. These funds are distributed to local agencies by formula and used to cover the cost of maintaining existing roads. Vehicle Registration Fee – Washington County has imposed a charge on vehicle registrations. This revenue is distributed to local agencies by formula. This revenue is primarily used for operations and maintenance but some funding and activities may result in capital improvements as well. Ride Hailing Service License Fees SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE REVIEW As Tigard grows, SDCs will continue to be an important source of funding for capital projects. As part of this TSP, the City is evaluating its current SDC program to ensure it aligns with the goals of the TSP and the City’s Strategic Plan. This TSP will be accompanied by recommendations to the SDC program to update the list of projects it funds to better align with the TSP and to ensure the program’s structure supports strategic goals like housing affordability and encouraging travel by walking, bicycling, and transit modes. Table of Contents CHAPTER 5. TRANSPORTATION FUNDING NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 87 Tigard recently entered an agreement with the City of Portland for administration of licensing and fees for ride hailing service, such as Lyft and Uber. Under Tigard municipal code (5.24.030(B) “….A TNC must pay the City a 50¢ fee per trip originating within the City of Tigard.” Revenue generated by fees shall be restricted to City service areas impacted by the operation of TNCs or involved in the regulation and administration of TNC policy. 5.3. Non-City revenue sources Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program (MSTIP) – this program is funded through a county property tax, approved by ballot initiative, dedicated toward transportation capital investments. House Bill (HB) 2017 - in 2017 the state legislature allocated additional revenue to transportation to be distributed to each community. These numbers were established as a biannual distribution and are reported as such. It was determined that this revenue source would generally be applied toward capital improvements. Federal and State Funds – The City receives other revenues for transportation from federal and state sources beyond those listed above. In general, these funds are directed towards specific projects or programs. 5.4. Other Potential Revenue Sources In addition to the revenue sources identified above, there are several other sources that will likely contribute to future planning and development of Tigard’s transportation system. 5.4.1. Urban Renewal District An Urban Renewal District (URD) is an area that is designated by a community to assist in economic development for revitalization. Funding for the revitalization is provided by urban renewal taxes, which are generated by the increase in total assessed values in the district from the time it was first established. Tigard has established urban renewal districts in the Downtown Tigard and the Tigard Triangle. The City Center Urban Renewal Plan was adopted in 2006 with a 20-year duration and a maximum indebtedness of $22 million. In May 2021, Tigard voters approved an extension to Fiscal year 2034/35 and increased the maximum indebtedness to just under $43 million. The Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan was approved by voters in 2017. This URD has a maximum indebtedness of $188 million and will endure through 2052/53. Both urban renewal plans will support investments in infrastructure, including transportation. The project list in the TSP Update is being coordinated with the projects identified in both URDs. 5.4.2. State and Federal Grants Table of Contents CHAPTER 5. TRANSPORTATION FUNDING NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 88 Tigard, like most cities, frequently seeks grants for transportation planning, design, and construction. These could include ODOT grants under the Bicycle-Pedestrian Program or State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP); or federal funds through the Regional Flexible Fund Allocation (RFFA) program, administered by Metro. The RFFA funding program also includes smaller targeted grants, such as the Regional Travel Options or Greenway Trails programs. Tigard has had considerable success with these programs in the past, including segments of the Fanno Creek Trail and phase 1 of the Main Street Green Street project. In this coming year, RFFA planning grants will pay for planning work for the Red Rock Creek Trail. Recently Tigard obtained approximately $1 million in a Safe Routes to School (SRTS) infrastructure grant for sidewalks on Locust Street as well as a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) for sidewalk infill on Commercial, SW 95th, and Frewing. In addition, the City received a recent TGM award for $100,000 to support development of an Electric Vehicle Strategy for the city. 2040 Transportation System Plan NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 89 Chapter 6 | Recommended Investments The previous chapters describe the City’s vision for accommodating travel for everyone in Tigard, a multimodal framework for planning facilities, and the level of capital project funded that Tigard anticipates over the life of this TSP. This chapter describes the TSP’s prioritized project list, which if built, would provide a safer and more connected multimodal system that can be afforded within the City’s anticipated financial resources over the next 20 years. 6.1. Project List Approximately 80 projects were identified to address existing and future transportation needs and deficiencies. The infographic on the following page describes the TSP project list, in terms of projects by type, location, and cost breakdown. These projects were evaluated at a planning level and serve as direction for further planning of transportation investments. While some of these improvements are warranted under existing conditions, in other cases projects are identified to address the transportation needs to accommodate forecast growth. In some cases, the planning-level assessment has identified a specific proposed treatment; however, a more detailed analysis will be required to identify any environmental, topographic, right-of-way, or other construction constraints and to identify specific treatments and alignments. The identified projects include site- specific low-cost improvements, such as bicycle lanes and pedestrian crossing improvements, as well as larger scale projects (e.g., interchange improvements or freeway overcrossings) needed to address issues on state or county roadways. These larger projects will require a leadership role by state, county and/or regional partners, but would be supported by the City. Improvement projects are grouped into six categories:  Stronger Streets Network: Roadway capacity and intersection enhancements to improve the function of the City’s arterial system.  Urban Upgrades & Active Transportation: Complete streets improvements and standalone infrastructure to improve comfort and safety for people walking and biking.  Connectivity: New street connections to reduce out-of-direction travel.  Transit: Transit supportive infrastructure, including features that support transit oriented development and speed and reliability.  TSMO: Transportation systems management and operations, such as signal enhancements and upgrades to improve the efficient of the transportation system. Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 90  Special Study Areas: Areas where the City should perform more focused planning to identify optimal improvements. These projects are illustrated in Figure 14 through 16. Tables 11 through 15 provide a description of the projects including the estimated costs. 2040 TSP Constrained Project List by Mode # Project Type Project Cost Estimate Number of Projects Stronger Streets Network Urban Upgrades & Active Transportation Connectivity TSMO Transit Special Study Area $96,976,000 $166,442,000 $30,100,000 $4,510,000 $7,370,000 $7,440,000 TOTAL $312,838,000 80 Project List by Cost HighCost(>10M) Medium High Cost(5M-10M) Medium Cost(1M-5M)Low Cost(<1M) 9%18%42%32% 32 32 5 2 3 6 TIGARD ON THE MOVE | 2040 Transportation System Plan 99 217 5 Taylors Ferry Rd 121st AveTiedemanAve72nd AveB e e f B e n d R d Locust St GreenburgRd Mcdonald St Walnut St Gaarde St 68th AveHun z i k e r R d Hall Blvd150thAvePfaffle St 135thAveS c h o l l s F e r r y R d RoshakRd 68thPkwy80th AveOak St Durham Rd 85th AveRoyRogersRdBonita Rd UpperBoonesFerryRdBull Mountain Rd SequoiaPkwyB u r n h a m S t Barrows Rd 78th AveWall StS-2 S-31 S-1 S-23 S-12 S-25 S-27 S-13 S-24 S-11 S-22 S-7 S-8 S-14 S-15 S-16 S-32 S-9Figure 14 Stronger Streets Projects 0 1 2½Miles Stronger Streets Projects N 217 HallBlvdLocust St Oak St S-12 S-13 S-11 S-8 S-14 S-15 S-16 Refer to TSP projects list for project descriptions. Project colors are assigned to help demarcate project extents and are for illustrative purposes only. Tigard City Boundary S-28S-29S-28 S-29 S-30S-21S-17S-18S-19S-20S-10S-6S-5S-3S-4S-17 S-9S-10S-26 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 93 Table 11. 2040 TSP Stronger Streets Projects PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST S-1 121st Ave/North Dakota St 121st Ave & North Dakota St Add a traffic signal. $630,000-$910,000 S-2 65th Ave/Haines St 65th Ave & Haines St Add signal and northbound right turn lane on 65th Ave at Haines St to maintain or improve mobility, queuing, and safety for TPR compliance. $1,350,000-$1,950,000 S-3 72nd Ave upgrade to urban standards Dartmouth St to Beveland St Widen to 4/5 lanes with one travel lane each direction, one center turn lane, and on street flex parking on both sides of street. Includes sidewalk and cycle track. $8,640,000- $12,480,000 S-4 Red Rock Creek to Dartmouth St One travel lane each direction, one center turn lane, on street parking on both sides of street. Includes sidewalk and cycle track. $9,090,000-$13,130,000 S-5 Gonzaga St to Beveland St Two travel lanes in each direction, one center turn lane, on-street parking on the east side of street. Includes sidewalk and cycle track. $2,430,000-$3,510,000 S-6 Highway 217 to Gonzaga St Two travel lanes in each direction, one center turn lane, no on-street parking. Includes sidewalk and cycle track. $2,430,000-$3,510,000 S-7 Durham Rd & SW 79th Ave Durham Rd & 79th Ave Add a westbound right-turn lane. $670,500-$968,500 S-8 Greenburg Rd Greenburg Rd & Cascade Ave Make operational improvements to reduce the intersection v/c ratio. $670,500- $968,500 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 94 PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST S-9 Highway 217 to Washington Square Rd (N) Install separated bike lanes and sidewalks per the Greenburg Rd plan in the Washington Square Regional Center update. Seek jurisdictional transfer of roadway segment from Washington County, coordinated with proposed improvements. $1,350,000-$1,950,000 S-10 Washington Square Rd (N) to Hall Blvd Narrow roadway to three lanes with turn lanes, separated bike lanes and sidewalks per the Greenburg Rd plan in the Washington Square Regional Center update. Seek jurisdictional transfer of roadway segment from Washington County, coordinated with proposed improvements. $900,000- $1,300,000 S-11 Greenburg Rd & Highway 217 Add a right-turn lane from Greenburg to SB Highway 217. $1,350,000-$1,950,000 S-12 Greenburg Rd & Oleson Rd & Hall Blvd Intersection Improvements. $1,350,000-$1,950,000 S-13 Greenburg Rd & Locust St Reconfigure to a standard 4 way intersection with crosswalks on all four legs per the Greenburg Rd plan in the Washington Square Regional Center update. $1,350,000-$1,950,000 S-14 Greenburg Rd & Washington Square Rd (N) Add a high visibility pedestrian crossing across Greenburg Rd per the Greenburg Rd plan in the Washington Square Regional Center update. $450,000-$650,000 S-15 Greenburg Rd & Lehman St Add a high visibility pedestrian crossing across Greenburg Rd per the Greenburg Road plan in the Washington Square Regional Center update. $450,000- $650,000 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 95 PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST S-16 Greenburg Rd & Summit Dr Add a high visibility pedestrian crossing across Greenburg Rd per the Greenburg Road plan in the Washington Square Regional Center update. $450,000-$650,000 S-17 Hall Blvd upgrade to urban standards and jurisdictional transfer from ODOT (SW Locust to SW Durham Rd) coordinated with roadway improvements Oleson Rd to Pacific Highway (OR99W) Upgrade to urban standards, including widen to 2/3 lanes; building sidewalks and bike lanes; safety improvements; and high visibility pedestrian crossings at Metzger Park and the future Steve Street Park. $4,680,000- $6,760,000 S-18 Pacific Highway (OR99W) to Fanno Creek Upgrade to urban standards with sidewalks and bike facilities depending on corridor plan. $1,800,000-$2,600,000 S-19 Fanno Creek to McDonald St Upgrade to urban standards with sidewalks and bike facilities depending on corridor plan. $450,000- $650,000 S-20 McDonald St to Bonita Rd Upgrade to urban standards with sidewalks and bike facilities depending on corridor plan. $1,350,000-$1,950,000 S-21 Bonita Rd to Durham Rd Upgrade to urban standards with sidewalks and bike facilities depending on corridor plan. $450,000- $650,000 S-22 Hall Blvd & Pfaffle St New traffic signal with appropriate illumination, crosswalks, and lengthening and separation of the turn lanes on Pfaffle St. $1,170,000- $1,690,000 S-23 Hall Blvd & Durham Rd Add a second southbound left-turn lane at the intersection of Hall Blvd/ Durham Rd. $630,000- $910,000 S-24 Hall Blvd & McDonald St Add a southbound right-turn lane from Hall Blvd to McDonald St and a second northbound left-turn lane. This would require a second receiving lane on McDonald St. $1,800,000- $2,600,000 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 96 PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST S-25 Hall Blvd & Hunziker St / Scoffins St intersection Realign offset intersection to cross intersection to alleviate congestion and safety issues. $6,750,000-$9,750,000 S-26 Pacific Highway (OR99W) Improvements Pacific Highway (OR99W) & Dartmouth St Intersection improvements for active transportation, including bicycle lanes and improved pedestrian facilities. $8,010,000- $11,570,000 S-27 Pacific Highway (OR99W) & I-5 Southbound Ramp Intersection improvements to maintain or improve mobility and safety for TPR compliance, such as the removal of the northbound left turn lane/signal at 64th Ave. $900,000- $1,300,000 S-28 King James Pl to 68th Pkwy Improve bicycle and pedestrian crossings of streets intersecting Pacific Highway (OR99W) between SW King James Pl and SW 68th Pkwy, including the intersection of 64th Ave. Crossing treatments may include, but are not limited to: sidewalk infill, marked crosswalks, Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB), High-intensity activated crosswalk beacons (HAWK), curb extensions, lighting improvements, signal changes, lane width reduction, and/or intersection reconstruction. $9,310,000- $13,450,000 S-29 Entire (in city) Fill in gaps in bike lanes along Pacific Highway (OR99W) and upgrade to buffered or separated facilities where warranted. Enhance bicycle crossings of major intersections. Assumes no roadway widening. $900,000-$1,300,000 S-30 Entire (in city) Complete gaps in sidewalk along the entire length of Pacific Highway (OR99W) within Tigard city limits. $6,580,000-$9,510,000 S-31 Scholls Ferry Rd/ River Terrace Blvd Scholls Ferry Rd & River Terrace Blvd Install a traffic signal with bicycle and pedestrian treatments. This location is a critical River Terrace Trail crossing. $1,170,000-$1,690,000 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 97 PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST S-32 Walnut St & SW Gaarde St Walnut St & Gaarde St Add a second northbound left lane. $670,000-$970,000 Taylors Ferry Rd 121st AveTiedeman AveevA dn27Roshak RdB e e f B e n d R d Mcdonald St Walnut St Dartmouth S t Gaarde St 68th AveHun z i k e r R d 150th AvePfaffle St 135th AveS c h o l l s F e r r y R d 68th Pkwy80th AveGreenburg RdOak St 85th AveRoy Rogers RdBonita Rd Locust St Bull Mountain Rd Sequoia PkwyB u r n h a m S t Barrows Rd 78th AveDurham Rd Wall StKing CityFonner StFonner St Hall BoulevardHall BoulevardWatkins AvenueWatkins AvenueAsh AvenueAsh AvenueF a n n o C r e e k T r a i l F a n n o C r e e k T r a i l North Dakota StNorth Dakota St Sattler StSattler St Summerfield DrSummerfield Dr Cook Park Greenbelt Cook Park Greenbelt Ki-A-Kuts Bicycle & Pedestrian Bridge Ki-A-Kuts Bicycle & Pedestrian Bridge Murdock StMurdock St AT-27 AT-19 AT-24 AT-4 AT-8 AT-18 AT-10 AT-5 C-3 AT-3 AT-31 AT-17 AT-12 AT-32 AT-27 AT-19 AT-24 AT-4 AT-8 AT-18 AT-10 AT-5 C-3 AT-3 AT-31 AT-17 AT-12 AT-32 AT-6 AT-25 AT-14 AT-25 AT-30 AT-7 AT-21 AT-22AT-13 AT-26 AT-11 AT2 AT-29 AT-23 AT-28 AT-9 AT-6 AT-25 AT-14 AT-25 AT-30 AT-7 AT-21 AT-22AT-13 AT-26 AT-11 AT2 AT-29 AT-23 AT-28 AT-9 C-1 C-2 AT-20 AT-1 AT-16 C-1 C-2 AT-20 AT-1 AT-16 C-4C-4 AT-15AT-15 5 217 99 Active Transportationand Connectivity Projects Figure 15 0 1 2½Miles N Water Railroad City of Tigard School Park Project C-2 (location TBD) Refer to TSP projects list for project descriptions. Project colors are assigned to help demarcate project extents and are for illustrative purposes only. Projects Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 99 Table 12. 2040 TSP Urban Upgrades & Active Transportation Projects PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST AT-1 121st Ave Upgrade to urban standards Tippit Pl to Whistler Lp (N) Build complete street with bicycle and pedestrian facilities. $4,050,000-$5,850,000 AT-2 Walnut St to Gaarde St Upgrade to urban standards with sidewalks and bicycle lanes. $2,160,000-$3,120,000 AT-3 North Dakota St to Walnut St Upgrade to urban standards with sidewalks and bicycle lanes. $1,728,000- $2,496,000 AT-4 68th Ave Bikeway 66th Ave to Oak St Install protected bike lanes (buffered bike lanes and flexible delineator posts) with no roadway widening on SW 68th Ave, SW 68th Pkwy, and SW 69th Ave between SW 66th Ave and SW Oak St. $90,000-$130,000 AT-5 79th Ave Bonita Rd to Durham Rd Fill sidewalk gaps and facilitate bicycling along 79th Ave so pedestrians will no longer be forced to share the roadway in the vehicle travel lane. $2,610,000-$3,770,000 AT-6 80th Ave Taylor’s Ferry Rd to Oak St Install bike lanes and construct sidewalks on both sides of the street from Taylor’s Ferry Rd to Oak St. $1,800,000-$2,600,000 AT-7 Ash Ave Trail connection Walnut Pl east of Pacific Highway (OR99W) to Ash Ave Create a new active transportation connection from Walnut Pl east of Pacific Highway (OR99W) to Ash Ave, connecting to the Fanno Creek Trail. $6,750,000-$9,750,000 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 100 PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST AT-8 Ash Ave/100th St Greenway Scoffins St to McDonald St; McDonald St to Murdock St Improve SW Ash Ave between SW Scoffins St and SW McDonald St, and SW 100th Ave between SW McDonald St and SW Murdock St to Neighborhood Greenway standards. This includes, but is not limited to, sidewalk infill, shared lane markings, speed humps, stop sign reconfiguration, curb extensions, and crossing improvements. At minimum, this project will include a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) and marked crossing at both the intersections of SW Scoffins St and SW McDonald St, a railroad crossing, shared lane markings, and speed humps. $5,670,000-$8,190,000 AT-9 Ash Creek Trail Alignment Study Fanno Creek Trail to 95th Ave & Shady Ln Determine the alignment for a shared-use path from the Fanno Creek Trail to the Highway 217 Crossing at 95th Ave (see project C-1) following the alignment of Ash Creek. Coordinate this study with the Greenburg/Tiedeman/N Dakota intersection study (Study-4), which includes a rail-crossing. $135,000-$195,000 AT-10 Bonita Rd improvements 72nd Avenue to I-5 Construct a traffic signal and add a bike lane along Bonita Rd from 72nd Ave to I-5 Bridge. $630,000-$910,000 AT-11 Bonita Rd & 72nd Ave Add a second northbound left lane from 72nd Ave to Bonita Rd. $670,000-$970,000 AT-12 Bull Mountain Rd Upgrade to Urban Standards Benchview Ter to Pacific Highway (OR99W) Upgrade Bull Mountain Rd from Benchview Ter (Tigard City Limits) to Pacific Highway (OR99W) to urban standards, including completing gaps in sidewalks and bike lanes. Add a crossing to connect Alberta Rider Elementary School to Elizabeth Price Park. $18,000,000-$26,000,000 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 101 PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST AT-13 Roy Rogers Rd to Pacific Highway (OR99W) Infill approximately 7,000 ft of sidewalk gaps on SW Bull Mountain Rd between Pacific Highway (OR99W) and SW Roy Rogers Rd. Sidewalks will be at least 6ft wide and include curb and gutter. This project will also install a marked crosswalk, a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB), and median at the intersection of SW Peachtree Dr. Also install protected bike lanes with no roadway widening on SW Bull Mountain Rd between Pacific Highway (OR99W) and SW Roy Rogers Rd. The section of Bull Mountain Rd between Benchview Ter and Darwin Ave is in Washington County and would require coordination with the County to complete this project along the full extents. Coordinate with Washington County AT-14 Dartmouth St widening 72nd Ave to 68th Ave Widen to 4 lanes plus turn lanes, bike facilities, and sidewalks between 72nd Ave and I-5 (68th Ave) to maintain or improve mobility, queuing, and safety for TPR5 compliance, such as the addition of a second westbound through lane and dedicated westbound turn lane at 68th Ave. Also consider options for on-street parking. $4,050,000-$5,850,000 AT-15 Fanno Creek Trail Entire Improve the Fanno Creek Trail system at various locations with upgraded facilities at the following locations: SW Hall Blvd (High-intensity activated crosswalk beacons or HAWK), SW Scholls Ferry Rd (signal), Woodward Park to SW Grant Ave (trail extension), SW Main St to SW Hall Blvd (trail extension), Tigard Public Library to SW Bonita Rd (trail extension), SW 85th Ave to Tualatin River (trail extension). This project also includes trail repair and would bring the existing segments of the trail up to standard for width. $7,050,000-$10,190,000 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 102 PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST AT-16 Fonner St/115th Ave/114th Ave Greenway Walnut St to Bull Mountain Rd Improve SW Fonner St, SW 115th Ave, and SW 114th Ave to Neighborhood Greenway standards between SW Walnut St and SW Bull Mountain Rd. This includes, but is not limited to, sidewalk infill, shared lane markings (2 per block), speed humps (2 per block), stop sign reconfiguration, curb extensions, and crossing improvements. At minimum, this project will include a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) and marked crossing at the intersection of SW Gaarde St, shared lane markings, and speed humps. $2,520,000-$3,640,000 AT-17 Gaarde St bikeway Pacific Highway (OR99W) to Walnut St Restripe the roadway with buffered bike lanes (no roadway widening included) on SW Gaarde St between Pacific Highway (OR99W) and SW Walnut St. $160,000-$230,000 AT-18 Greenburg Rd, Tiedeman Ave, and North Dakota St Complete Streets Greenburg Rd, Tiedeman Ave and North Dakota St Following the completion of a circulation study (Study-4), construct the identified projects to improve circulation and bring the roadways up to urban standards with complete bicycle and pedestrian facilities. $14,670,000- $21,190,000 AT-19 Locust St Greenburg Rd and Hall Blvd A new crosswalk with a rapid rate flashing beacon will be constructed across SW Locust St to SW Lincoln St. A new sidewalk and upgraded bike lane will be constructed from SW 92nd Ave to Hall Blvd on the north side of Locust St. $1,500,000-$2,160,000 AT-20 Main St Green Street Retrofit (Phase 2) Railroad tracks to Pacific Highway (OR99W) Provide two travel lanes, turn lanes where necessary, on-street parking, good sidewalks, and lots of pedestrian-friendly amenities on Main St from the railroad tracks north to Pacific Highway (OR99W). $3,690,000- $5,330,000 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 103 PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST AT-21 McDonald St Hall Blvd to Pacific Highway (OR99W) Widen roadway to a 3-lane complete street (with sidewalks, buffered bike lanes, and center turn lanes where appropriate) and crossing enhancements at some locations. $19,800,000-$28,600,000 AT-22 Murdock St. Improvements 103rd Ave to James Templeton Elementary Construct sidewalks and minor roadway widening where required along one side of the street from 103rd Ave to James Templeton Elementary. This project will also construct a new storm drainage system. $2,190,000-$3,160,000 AT-23 North Dakota St (Fanno Creek) Bridge Replacement Entire Replace bridge, with bike lanes and sidewalks. $4,950,000-$7,150,000 AT-24 Oak St Improvements Greenburg Rd to Hall Blvd A new 12' wide multi-use trail on the south side of the road from Greenburg Rd to Hall Blvd. $1,530,000- $2,210,000 AT-25 Red Rock Creek Greenway Trail NA New trail paralleling Red Rock Creek in the Tigard Triangle. Alignment and design details subject to Red Rock Creek Trail Alignment Study to be completed in 2022. Trail will connect to Fanno Creek Trail near the Tigard Public Library via a new rail overcrossing (see project C-4) and a crossing of Highway 217 (see project C-2) $4,050,000- $5,850,000 AT-26 Roy Rogers Rd Bull Mountain Rd to Beef Bend Rd Complete roadway improvements to a five lane county arterial from Bull Mountain Road to Beef Bend Road. Improvements between Scholls Ferry Road and the Urban Growth Boundary are currently under construction in conjunction with the Willamette Water Supply PLM 5.1 project. $8,640,000- $12,480,000 AT-27 Taylor’s Ferry Rd Washington Dr to 62nd Ave Complete gaps in sidewalk and add bike lanes on both sides of the street from Washington Dr to 62nd Ave. $5,970,000-$8,620,000 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 104 PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST AT-28 Tiedeman Ave upgrade to urban standard Railroad Tracks to Greenburg Rd Build a sidewalk, bike lane and associated stormwater infrastructure. $810,000-$1,170,000 AT-29 Tigard St (Fanno Creek) Bridge Replacement Entire Replace bridge, with bike lanes and sidewalk. $4,680,000-$6,760,000 AT-30 Tigard St Heritage Trail southern extension Main St to rail path Conduct a feasibility study to extend the Heritage trail south from its current end point on Main St through the TriMet Park and Ride to connect with the existing rail path. This would include an improved crossing of Main St adjacent to the rail line. $135,000-$195,000 AT-31 Walnut St Upgrade to urban standards Tiedeman Ave to 135th Ave Infill a sidewalk gaps on SW Walnut St between Tiedeman Avenue and SW 135th Ave. Sidewalks will be at least 6ft wide and include curb and gutter. Also install protected bike lanes with no roadway widening on SW Walnut St between Tiedeman Ave to 135th Ave. $7,520,000-$10,860,000 AT-32 Watkins Ave Pedestrian Corridor Walnut St to Pacific Highway (OR99W) Infill sidewalk gaps on SW Watkins Ave between SW Walnut St and Pacific Highway (OR99W). Sidewalks will be at least 6ft wide and include curb and gutter. This project shares partial extents with a planned Neighborhood Greenway on SW Watkins Ave between SW Park St and SW Fairhaven St. $3,060,000- $4,420,000 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 105 Table 13. 2040 TSP Connectivity Projects PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST C-1 Highway 217 Crossing at 95th 95th Ave & Shady Ln on the south side to 95th Ave on the north side of Highway 217 A new active transportation crossing of Highway 217 from 95th Ave/Shady Ln on the south side to 95th Ave on the north side of Highway 217. This bike and pedestrian overcrossing would provide a direct connection between the Washington Square Regional Center and Metzger area to Downtown Tigard, the Fanno Creek Trail system, and the rest of the City south of Highway 217. $8,100,000- $11,700,000 C-2 Highway 217 Pedestrian/Bicycle Overcrossing Tigard Triangle to Downtown Tigard region, TBD Construct a new Highway 217 overcrossing for active transportation users connecting the Tigard Triangle with Downtown Tigard. This project may be coordinated with the Southwest Corridor Light Rail and the Red Rock Creek Trail planning efforts. The exact alignment of the overcrossing is to be determined. $8,100,000-$11,700,000 C-3 Ped/Bike Rail Undercrossing at 95th Ave Commercial St to Tigard St This project would build a railroad undercrossing for pedestrians and bicycles west of Pacific Highway (OR99W), connecting Grant Ave with 95th Ave. $3,620,000-$5,230,000 C-4 Red Rock Creek Trail rail overcrossing Wall Street to Fanno Creek Trail near Tigard Library As part of the Red Rock Creek Greenway Trail (project AT-25), build a rail overcrossing to connect to the Fanno Creek Trail near the Tigard Library. Alignment and design details subject to Red Rock Creek Trail Alignment Study to be completed in 2022. $6,000,000 99 217 5 Taylors Ferry Rd 121stAveTiedemanAve72nd AveB e e f B e n d R d Locust St Greenburg R d Mcdonald St Walnut St Dartmouth St Gaarde St 68th AveHun z i k e r R d Hall Blvd150thAvePfaffle St 135thAveS c h o l l s F e r r y R d RoshakRd 68thPkwy80th AveOak St Durham Rd 85th AveRoyRogersRdBonita RdBull Mountain Rd SequoiaPkwyBarrows Rd 78th AveWall StTSMO-1 and T-1 Study-7Study-7 Study-6 Study-4 Study-2Study-1Transit, TSMO, and Study Area Projects Figure 16 0 1 2½Miles Transit and TSMO Projects N Refer to TSP projects list for project descriptions. Project colors are assigned to help demarcate project extents and are for illustrative purposes only. Tigard City Boundary Study Area Projects Study-3T-3T-2Study-5 TSMO-2 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 107 Table 14. 2040 TSP Transit Transportation Projects PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST T-1 Tigard Connector Service in the Tigard Triangle N & A Provide local connector service serving Tigard Triangle to Downtown Tigard, and/or the Washington Square Mall and potential residential areas. $990,000-$1,430,000 T-2 Transit supportive treatments on Pacific Highway (OR99W) Entire (in city) Support existing high frequency bus service on the Pacific Highway (OR99W) corridor by providing benches, shelters, and real-time information at bus stops. $540,000- $780,000 T-3 Transit supportive treatments on Pacific Highway (OR99W) Entire (in city) Support existing high frequency bus service on the Pacific Highway (OR99W) corridor by implementing transit treatments such as bus queue bypass lanes and transit signal priority at key intersections. $4,500,000-$6,500,000 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 108 Table 15. 2040 TSP TSMO Projects PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST TSMO-1 Tigard Triangle Adaptive Signals N & A Upgrade signals throughout the Tigard Triangle with adaptive signal coordination technology. $2,700,000-$3,900,000 TSMO-2 Upper Boones Ferry Rd / Durham Rd Adaptive Signal Coordination Upper Boones Ferry Rd & Durham Rd Improve arterial corridor operations by expanding traveler information and upgrading traffic signal equipment and timings. Install upgraded traffic signal controllers, establish communications to the central traffic signal system, provide arterial detection (including bicycle detection where appropriate) and routinely update signal timings. Provide real-time and forecasted traveler information on arterial roadways including current roadway conditions, congestion information, travel times, incident information, construction work zones, current weather conditions and other events that may affect traffic conditions. Upgrade and/or add traffic signage. Also includes ongoing maintenance and parts replacement. $990,000-$1,430,000 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 109 Table 16. 2040 TSP Special Study Area Projects PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST Study-1 Ash Ave Railroad Crossing Burnham St to Commercial St Conduct a feasibility study to extend Ash Ave across the railroad tracks in a grade-separated bicycle and pedestrian crossing from Burnham to Commercial St. $225,000- $325,000 Study-2 72nd Ave/Highway 217 Interchange Improvements 72nd Ave & Highway 217 Interchange Conduct a feasibility study and identify a preferred concept for the Highway 217 interchange at 72nd Ave. As a part of this study, review recommended projects from the Tigard Triangle to assess the need for additional lanes to maintain or improve mobility, queuing, and safety for TPR compliance, such as the addition of a second northbound right turn lane. Key to this project is improving connectivity between the Triangle and downtown Tigard through a redesign of the interchange and assessment of multimodal connectivity opportunities. This study would identify the type, size, and location for ways to improve north/south connectivity into the Tigard Triangle for roadway users. The preferred concept should include pedestrian and bicycle facilities consistent with the City's design standards. $450,000- $650,000 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 110 PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST Study-3 99W Study Entire Highway 99W plays an essential role in our regional and state transportation systems. This corridor links the cities of Tigard, Tualatin, and Sherwood and connects the Portland Metro area to the greater Willamette Valley. It serves a concentration of communities of color, limited English proficiency speakers, and lower income communities. Highway 99W runs through the center of cities along the corridor, separating residential areas from commercial areas, making it difficult for pedestrians to cross the highway. The envisioned corridor will provide opportunities for lower-wage earners to access a range of employment throughout the region. The Highway 99W Corridor Study will: - Develop a unified vision for the corridor through extensive public and stakeholder outreach - Assemble a list of the needs, opportunities and constraints - Conduct market analyses and identify potential investment strategies for road, transit and land use improvements - Determine how 99W and the surrounding local transportation networks should be improved and managed to balance local, regional and long-distance travel needs - Identify transportation infrastructure projects, service enhancements and potential funding sources - Develop a strategy for economic resilience, adaptation and growth - Identify potential land use and transportation system plan changes to build equitable multimodal, transit-supportive communities along the corridor $4,500,000-$6,500,000 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 111 PROJECT ID PROJECT NAME EXTENTS DESCRIPTION COST Study-4 Greenburg Rd, Tiedeman Ave and North Dakota St Circulation Study Greenburg Rd, Tiedeman Ave, and North Dakota St Conduct a circulation study to evaluate the proposed projects around the intersections of Greenburg Rd, Tiedeman Ave and North Dakota St. The study would identify a preferred concept plan to improve circulation and bring the roadways up to urban standards with complete bicycle and pedestrian facilities. This study would also identify an alignment for the Ash Creek Trail connecting from Fanno Creek Trail at North Dakota St to the new Highway 217 overcrossing at 95th Avenue. $225,000-$325,000 Study-5 Main St Signals Study Entire Complete a feasibility study and operational analysis for potential traffic signals as Main St/Tigard St and Main St/Commercial St. Signals would need to be coordinated with the adjacent railroad crossing. $225,000-$325,000 Study-6 Metzger Neighborhood Circulation and Connectivity Study NA Conduct a circulation study to reassess street classifications, cross sections, and connectivity to better distribute traffic in the Metzger Neighborhood. Add Lincoln street description. $225,000- $325,000 Study-7 Upper Boones Ferry Rd, 72nd Ave, Durham Rd Circulation Study Upper Boones Ferry Rd, 72nd Ave, Durham Rd Conduct a circulation study to evaluate the proposed projects around the intersections of Upper Boones Ferry Rd, 72nd Ave, and Durham Rd as well as the I-5 interchange on Carmen Drive. The study would identify a preferred concept plan to improve circulation and bring the roadways up to urban standards with complete bicycle and pedestrian facilities. $450,000-$650,000 Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 112 6.2. Citywide Programs While a major focus of the TSP is on future transportation capital projects, ongoing maintenance and other citywide programs are vital to the upkeep and improvement of Tigard’s transportation system to best serve residents, businesses, and visitors. Key citywide program that are critical to ensuring safe and equitable mobility are described below. 6.2.1. Pedestrian and Cyclist Connections Program The Pedestrian and Cyclist Connections Program is an annual program on the City’s Capital Improvement Program. It focused on filling in missing sidewalks, bike lanes, pathways, crosswalk treatments, and minor intersection modifications. The city will be increasing the CIP program budget to address needs in the TSP. he projects covered under this program typically cost less than $50,000 and may be located throughout the City. Funds from this program can also be used to cover matching funds for eligible grant projects benefitting pedestrians and cyclists. The Pedestrian and Bicycle Networks identified in this TSP provide guidance as to where investments under this program would provide the most value. 6.2.2. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Right-of-Way Program This annual program implements projects from the City’s ADA Transition Plan to provide equal access and remove barriers to public facilities. This program focuses on needs in the right-of-way including curb ramps and pedestrian crossing push buttons. Projects are prioritized based on criteria in the City’s 2019 ADA Transition Plan and may be coordinated with the annual Pavement Management Program. 6.2.3. Pavement Management Program Funded by the Street Maintenance Fee, this annual program provides for the preservation or replacement of the road through overlays, crack sealing, or slurry sealing. The program also upgrades some curb ramps when they are impacted by overlay projects. A key element of this program is implementing low-cost striping improvements to fille bikeway gaps. The program rehabilitates or performs preventative maintenance on about 15 miles of streets each year to extend the usable service life of the pavement. 6.2.4. Traffic and Transportation System Major Maintenance Program The City has a large amount of deferred signal maintenance at the traffic signals it owns and operates. This annual program provides funding to replace signal equipment that is outdated, poorly operating, or near failure. Work includes items like signal head upgrades, controller cabinets and appurtenances, and functionality upgrades such as new controllers and detection for vehicles, cyclists, and pedestrians. Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 113 6.2.5. Fiber Communication Networks Program A fully connected and functioning fiber network allows the City to have a connected traffic signal system to optimize traffic flow and efficiency. In addition, it allows for remote access to signal systems, which improves response times to community concerns and signal issues. This program adds conduit and/or fiber as an opportunity response to other planned projects to help build out the City’s signal fiber network. 6.2.6. Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Infrastructure Improvements The City should consider creating a new program to implement smaller scale infrastructure improvements as part of their Safe Routes to School Program. There are a number of larger capital projects on the project list that provide improved access to the City’s schools, but this program would capture smaller spot improvements. It could also be used to cover matching funds for eligible grant projects benefitting SRTS. 6.2.7. Citywide Curb Space Management Program Cities everywhere are seeing an uptick in demand for curb space with growth in online shopping and associated freight deliveries, curbside pickups and drop- offs, ridehailing through transportation network companies like Uber and Lyft, storage for micromobility fleet devices like bikes and scooters, electric vehicle charging, and increased desire for curbspace activation, via parklets and streeteries. These emerging uses are increasingly competing for limited curb space with traditional uses like transit access and parking. To effectively manage this limited resource, the City should develop a curbside management program that inventories the City’s curbspace resources to maximize mobility, safety, and access for the wide variety of curb demands. The City has an agreement in place to develop parking management strategies in the Tigard Triangle. In addition to the Triangle parking management plan, the City plans to establish a fully resourced citywide parking and curbside management program to identify other locations for parking solutions, as well as broad-based parking policies related to parking supply and curb management. 6.2.8. Micromobility Solutions The range of travel options available to people is expanding rapidly, especially as it relates to micromobility devices such as electric bikes and scooters. Many communities throughout the world have seen the introduction of bikeshare and scootershare programs, which make fleet devices available via an app. These “new modes” offer a green and convenient alternative to driving and are aligned with the policy objectives of this TSP. While Tigard does not currently have a bikeshare or scootershare program, this is likely to change in the near future. As such, the City should develop programs and policies to facilitate introduction of these new travel modes, including provision of necessary infrastructure and regulations to ensure that fleet operations fit seamlessly within the City’s overall transportation system. Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 114 6.2.9. Transit Infrastructure Upgrades While Tigard does not directly control transit service, the City can support improved transit infrastructure in the public right-of-way. A transit infrastructure program would provide funds for upgrades to bus stop amenities such as benches, lighting, and bicycle parking. This program would also cover intersection upgrades such as transit signal priority, bus queue jumps, and improved bus pull outs as an opportunity response to other planned projects. These could be used in conjunction with TriMet funds to improve stops and signals throughout the City. 6.2.10. On-Demand Transit Some areas of Tigard may not have the density needed to support a fixed route bus service. In these areas alternative transit services such as on-demand service organized through an app or small circulator shuttles that pick up and drop off at key destinations could fill the gap in transit service. Tigard should partner with agencies to provide services like Ride Connection (currently operating in Tigard and the Metro region) to offer expanded on-demand transit or microtransit services for seniors and people with disabilities in areas that are not currently served by TriMet. There may also be opportunities to pilot new and expanded alternative transit services for the general population 6.2.11. Vehicle Electrification The City was just awarded TGM grant funding to develop an Electric Mobility Strategy. A new EV program would fund needed future investments to support the transition to electric vehicles. Examples include charging infrastructure and programmatic elements such as potential pilot programs. 6.2.12. Neighborhood Traffic Management Neighborhood Traffic Management (NTM) is a term that has been used to describe traffic control devices typically used in residential neighborhoods to slow traffic or possibly reduce the volume of traffic. NTM is descriptively called traffic calming due to its ability to improve neighborhood livability. Tigard has done extensive work in the way of testing and implementing NTM measures such as speed humps, chokers, pavement texturing, circles, chicanes, and other elements. The following are examples of neighborhood traffic management strategies that have been applied in Tigard:  speed wagon (reader board that displays vehicle speeds)  speed humps  traffic circles  medians  landscaping and street trees  chokers (narrow roadways in short sections)  narrow streets  closing streets  photo radar  on-street parking  selective enforcement Table of Contents CHAPTER 6. RECOMMENDED INVESTMENTS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 115  neighborhood watch  curb extensions Typically, NTM receives a favorable reception by residents adjacent to streets where vehicles travel at speeds above 30 mph. This program would implement traffic management strategies throughout the City. 2040 Transportation System Plan NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 116 Chapter 7 | Special Planning Areas This chapter identifies four special planning areas within the city: Tigard Triangle, Washington Square Regional Center, Downtown Tigard, and River Terrace. These areas offer growth opportunities, but also face significant transportation challenges. This chapter describes each area, including a summary of current transportation challenges, followed by strategies for infrastructure investments. 7.1. Land Use Planning Each of these areas is designated for significant housing and employment growth. Development of commercial and residential uses in close proximity to each other promotes walking trips for commute trips and non- commute travel. These opportunities can be captured by incorporating densities, mixed-uses, design standards and other land use strategies in the overall planning efforts for the areas. 7.2. Parking Management Parking management will be a critical component of creating travel options to and from each area. Adequate parking is essential to economic vitality; at the same time too much parking can degrade the pedestrian environment and unnecessarily increase impervious surface. A review of parking requirements and parking management measures is warranted in conjunction with land use planning for these areas. In particular, as more emphasis and investment is directed toward accommodating trips made by walking, bicycling, and transit, the amount of parking provided and how it is managed should be modified to support the priority purposes of each area. 7.3. Tigard Triangle The Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan, completed in 2015, created a blueprint for a pedestrian-oriented, mixed-use district built around the Triangle’s distinguishing natural features with the vision that, ultimately, the Triangle evolves into an active, multimodal district connected to the City and the region that attracts new residents and businesses. To implement this vision, specific provisions for land uses and design standards—including building heights and massing, public and pedestrian spaces, multimodal and circulation and parking requirements are included in the Plan to guide development. In 2016, the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan was created which identifies specific goals and urban renewal projects within the Triangle The Tigard Triangle is bordered by Pacific Highway, I-5, and Highway 217. Although these are three major regional roadways, these roadways function as barriers to access the Triangle. Access to and from the Tigard Triangle area is a critical issue to the success of the area. The majority of employees and customers traveling to the area on city streets access the Tigard Triangle area Table of Contents CHAPTER 7. SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 117 off of Pacific Highway. There is considerable congestion on Pacific Highway in the vicinity of the Tigard Triangle and this congestion is forecast to worsen with regional growth. A second issue with the Triangle relates to non-auto mobility/circulation to, from, and within the area. The Triangle area as a whole is generally sloping downward from Pacific Highway and I-5 to Highway 217. The topography makes walking and bicycling difficult. These conditions are exacerbated by incomplete bicycle and pedestrian systems within the Triangle and a lack of non- motorized connections across the major roadways that border the Triangle. At the broadest level, options for improving access to and within the Tigard Triangle fall into the following categories: • Provide additional intersection and roadway capacity improvements to the boundary streets. • Increase internal connectivity as development occurs to support a pedestrian-oriented development pattern. Maximize existing infrastructure investments by focusing on parking management and travel demand management programs. • Build upon high capacity transit planning and transit oriented development to increase density and encourage non-auto trip making. • Provide a more integrated system of transportation options for pedestrians, cyclists, and transit users. Figure 17 shows the existing and planned transportation facilities in the Tigard Triangle that improve access to, from, and within the area. New streets, trails, and paths are designed to complete the original street grid pattern and provide additional circulation options for all modes of travel. A new bridge across Highway 217 is intended to overcome the barrier created by the Highway to create a better connection with Downtown Tigard. The 72nd Avenue corridor study determined segment- specific cross sections that address the competing multimodal transportation needs along this corridor. Another key project in the Triangle is the Red Rock Creek Trail, a planned off-street facility running parallel to Pacific Highway and connecting across Highway 217 to Downtown Tigard. These projects are described in more detail in Chapter 6. Table of Contents CHAPTER 7. SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 118 Figure 17. Triangle map Table of Contents CHAPTER 7. SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 119 7.4. Washington Square Regional Center The WSRC is the only designated Regional Center in the City of Tigard. It is primarily designated for mixed-use development and is an area of the City with significant forecast job growth. Some of the highest job growth in the WSRC is on the west side of Highway 217 and along Hall Boulevard east of Greenburg Road. A plan for the area, being updated in 2021, includes priority projects aimed at connecting the Washington Square Mall with the land uses on the west side of Highway 217 and east to the Metzger Neighborhood. The WSRC is crisscrossed by Highway 217, Scholls Ferry Road and Greenburg Road and partially bounded by Hall Boulevard and Fanno Creek. Travel in and out of the area is primarily funneled through the Highway 217/Scholls Ferry Road and Highway 217/Greenburg Road interchanges and the Scholls Ferry Road/Hall Boulevard intersection. All of these facilities are under the jurisdiction of either ODOT or Washington County and currently experience significant peak hour congestion and queuing. The WSRC has a transit center at Washington Square connecting it to the Beaverton, Sunset, Tigard, and Lake Oswego, as well as the City of Tualatin and downtown Portland. It also has a WES commuter rail station located on the west side of Highway 217 near Hall Boulevard. Although all of the major facilities in the WSRC have sidewalks (with the exception of segments of Greenburg Road), the size, traffic volumes and design of all of the intersections and roadways within the WSRC do not create a very desirable environment for pedestrians to travel within the WSRC. Similarly, the absence of bicycle lanes on Greenburg Road, and around the Highway 217 ramp terminals on Scholls Ferry Road, compromise cycling access to the WSRC. The WSRC is an important regional center in Tigard and Washington County. Multi-modal access and accommodation of growth continue to be priorities. Options for improving access to the WSRC area fall into the following categories: • Provide better facilities for alternative modes, especially pedestrians and bicycles. • Improve internal circulation within the Mall site. • Provide intersection and roadway capacity improvements to improve traffic operations at the boundary streets. Figure 18 shows the planned improvement projects serving the WSRC vicinity. The 1999 WSRC Plan proposed two bridges and roadways to connect the WSRC across Highway 217 to reduce the magnitude of this barrier: the northern crossing extended from Washington Square Mall Road across Highway 217 connecting to Cascade Avenue; the southern crossing conceptually extending Locust Street across Highway 217 to Nimbus Avenue. The current plan update reviewed the potential Highway 217 crossings in conjunction with the development of the TSP and consolidated these crossings into a single nonmotorized crossing at 95th Avenue east of Greenburg Road. Table of Contents CHAPTER 7. SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 120 Other infrastructure improvements planned within the WSRC include pedestrian improvements throughout the WSRC, bicycle lanes on Greenburg Road, street connectivity enhancements on Lincoln Street, and intersection enhancements on Greenburg Road and Hall Boulevard. Specific project considerations can be found in the TSP project list. Table of Contents CHAPTER 7. SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 121 Figure 18. WSRC map Table of Contents CHAPTER 7. SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 122 7.5. Downtown Tigard The City of Tigard is committed to creating a downtown that is active, has a compact urban form and provides multi-modal access and circulation. Public investments and planning activities for downtown are intended to provide a catalyst for economic development. Significant growth in Downtown Tigard is planned for both employment and housing uses. Downtown Tigard is primarily located south of Pacific Highway between Hall Boulevard and Fanno Creek but also extends north of the Pacific Highway near Greenburg Road and Hall Boulevard. Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard are the primary access routes to the downtown area. Pacific Highway currently experiences significant peak hour congestion and queuing which also impacts travel on Hall Boulevard. The Pacific Highway viaduct over the railroad tracks creates a grade separation between Pacific Highway and Main Street and limits both access and visibility to the Downtown Tigard from the highway. Downtown Tigard has a transit center which connects riders to the Beaverton Transit Center, Sherwood, Lake Oswego, Tualatin, and downtown Portland. The Tigard Transit Center is also served by WES Commuter Rail. The existing transit service available to Downtown Tigard, combined with future plans to provide high capacity transit from Portland to Tualatin with stops in central Tigard, position Downtown to have transit service that can support increased employment and residential growth in the area despite existing congestion along Pacific Highway. Although Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard have sidewalks and bicycle lanes (with the exception of a few gaps in the sidewalk system on Hall Boulevard), the lack of local and collector street connectivity and existing roadway geometry within the Downtown Tigard area do not create a very desirable environment for pedestrians and bicyclists to travel within the downtown. At the broadest level, options for improving access to the downtown area fall into the following categories: • Improve local and collector roadway connectivity to and within Downtown Tigard. • Provide better facilities for alternative modes (transit, bicycles, pedestrians, etc.). • Enhance intersection capacity on Pacific Highway to increase the ability to cross and access Pacific Highway from Walnut Street, Greenburg Road and Hall Boulevard. To address these issues, the City prepared a City Center Urban Renewal Plan (updated 2021) which identified a more complete system of streets and pathways to improve multi-modal access to, from and within the Downtown Mixed Use Central Business District. Connectivity and circulation improvements, including new road and pathway connections within and adjacent to the downtown area were identified and can be seen in Figure 19. These improvements are intended to foster creation of smaller block sizes, efficient routes into and within downtown, and new streets to accommodate and encourage downtown development as well as to solve some existing connectivity issues, such as access across railroad tracks. Table of Contents CHAPTER 7. SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 123 Figure 19. Downtown Tigard Table of Contents CHAPTER 7. SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 124 7.6. River Terrace River Terrace is a 500-acre greenfield development on the western edge of the City. Annexation was completed in 2013 and the community plan for River Terrace 1.0 was adopted in 2015 with significant development following soon afterwards. The community plan includes new streets, the River Terrace Trail, and local community parks. This plan covered the first phase of development at River Terrace. Concept planning for the second phase of River Terrace is currently underway. The first phase of River Terrace is generally bounded by Scholls Ferry Road to the north, a point halfway between Bull Mountain Road and Beef Bend Road to the south, Roshak Road/ 150th Avenue to the east, and Roy Rogers Road to the west. New development along Roy Rogers Road spurred expansion of the roadway and the addition of new sidewalks and bike lanes. To the east and west of Roy Rogers Road will be a connected network of streets and shared-use paths providing on- and off-street connections to schools, parks, housing, and shopping. Primary street connections to Roy Rogers Road for those driving in the River Terrace area will be via Lorenzo Lane, Bull Mountain Road, and a new street located midway between Bull Mountain Road and Beef Bend Road. New roadways within River Terrace are expected to meet urban standards for walking and bicycling infrastructure. However, no transit connections are planned for the development, which limits the ability of residents to travel outside the area by non-auto modes. Options for improving access to the River Terrace area fall into the following categories: • Provide complete facilities for alternative modes, especially pedestrians and bicycles. • Build a street grid that promotes internal circulation within the River Terrace site. • Provide intersection and roadway capacity improvements to improve traffic operations at the boundary streets. Figure 20 shows the plan area and new connections within the development. While some of these have since been completed, such as sections of River Terrace Boulevard, the streets and intersection improvements not yet completed are included in the TSP project list described in Chapter 6. Table of Contents CHAPTER 7. SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 125 Figure 20. River Terrace 2040 Transportation System Plan Chapter 8 | Implementation Plan NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 126 Chapter 8 | Implementation Pla 8.1. Programmatic and Code Changes The TSP establishes a vision for the City to work towards, with the most visible goal posts being the modal plans and TSP project list. However, reaching these goal posts will require modifications to the City’s Development Code, Engineering Standards, Transportation System Development Charge Program; and other key policies. The following summarizes the recommended programmatic and code changes as part of the TSP update, but more details on these recommendations are provided in the Technical Appendix in the form of memoranda. 8.1.1. Development Code Title 18 is the Development Code for the City of Tigard. Subsection 910 provides guidance for the improvement of streets and will require updates to align with this direction provided in this TSP. Specific changes include:  Replace all TSP references to Tigard on the Move, 2040 TSP.  Update guidance for street cross-sections, including recommendations for lane widths and inclusion of parking and bicycle facilities in text, tables, and figures to align with the recommendations and policy direction of this TSP  Update characterization of Hall Boulevard to reflect the jurisdictional transfer 8.1.2. Engineering Standards Roadway design standards dictate how new transportation facilities need to be built. This includes the roadway cross-section elements, such as lane width and inclusion of sidewalks, as well as provision of off-street parking, and streetscape elements. These can be found in the City of Tigard’s Public Improvement Design Standards, which are currently under revision, and the City’s Development Code. Both the state and Metro have a number of guidance documents when updating the cross-sections, including the ODOT Highway Design Manual, ODOT Blueprint for Design, Metro Designing Livable Streets, Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (OBPP) and Regional Active Transportation Plan (ATP). To reflect the policy direction of this TSP, updated standards should reflect more comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian facilities; traffic calming features, and curb zone features that respond to more robust use of the curb for freight deliveries, drop off/pick up, storage of micromobility fleet devices like electric-bikes and scooters, electric vehicle charging, and curb space activation, such as streeteries and parklets. Metro also provides roadway design guidance in its 2018 RTP. This guidance applies to roadways that fall under Metro’s Regional Motor Vehicle Network. Within Tigard this includes several roadways: Highway 217 and I-5 are identified as throughways, Pacific Highway is identified as a major arterial, and several other roadways are identified as minor arterials. The City should continue to Table of Contents CHAPTER 8. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 127 coordinate with regional entities to ensure that design guidance for these regionally significant facilities continues to support the policy goals of this TSP. 8.1.3. Transportation SDCs As Tigard grows, SDCs will continue to be an important source of funding for capital projects. As part of this TSP, the City is evaluating its current SDC program to ensure it aligns with the goals of the TSP and the City’s Strategic Plan. Key updates to the SDC program include the list of projects it funds to align with the 2040 TSP project list and ensuring the program’s structure supports strategic goals like housing affordability and encouraging travel by walking, bicycling, and transit modes. 8.1.4. Other Key Policy Shifts Beyond projects, the TSP recommends several other policy shifts that will need to be adopted as part of Tigard’s Comprehensive Plan. These include:  Citywide expansion of 20 mph speed zones on all local class and high-priority neighborhood class streets  Updates to speed limits on streets listed in Chapter 4 of this TSP  Updates to functional classification of streets listed in Chapter 4 of this TSP  Establishment of fully resourced citywide parking and curbside management program 10 Oregon Global Warming Commission 2020 Biennial Report. https://www.keeporegoncool.org/reports/  Establishment of fully resourced neighborhood traffic calming program  Designating certain areas of Tigard as Multi- Modal Mixed Use Areas (MMAs). This concept allows the City to exercise more flexibility in balancing the mobility needs of cars with non- auto modes. This designation has been discussed for Downtown, but may be appropriate for other areas such as WSRC and the Triangle. 8.2. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures According to the Oregon Global Warming Commission 10, almost 36 percent of Oregon’s total GHG emissions derive from transportation. Transportation emissions can be reduced by improving the emissions profile of the vehicle fleet, such as switching to more electric vehicles, or by reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and encourage mode shifts from single-occupancy vehicles to shared (e.g., transit) or active modes of transportation (e.g., bicycle). This shift to more active transportation modes aligns with the City’s updated strategic vision to be an equitable community that is accessible, walkable, and healthy for everyone. Implementing policies and programs to reduce GHG emissions will support the City’s goal to be carbon neutral by 2035. It also creates a healthier community and reduces the burden that Table of Contents CHAPTER 8. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 128 pollution and climate change, driven by GHG emissions, often have on BIPOC and low income communities. There are a number of transportation measures that Tigard could implement to further its GHG reduction goals. These measures are pulled from the Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity 11, which is discussed in more detail in the Technical Appendix.  Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program (Voluntary)  Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program (Mandatory Implementation and Monitoring)  Implement Commute Trip Reduction Marketing  Provide Ridesharing Program  Implement Subsidized or Discounted Transit Program  Provide Employer-Sponsored Vanpool  Price Workplace Parking  Provide Community-Based Travel Planning  Implement Employee Parking Cash-Out  Provide Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure  Implement Market Price Public Parking (On- Street) There are ten measures related to Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) programs, including implementation of voluntary (up to 4% GHG reduction) or mandatory (up to 26% GHG reduction) CTR programs. Tigard does not 11 August 2021 Public Review Draft. https://www.airquality.org/ClimateChange/Documents/Ha ndbook%20Public%20Draft_2021-Aug.pdf currently require new development to offer commuter benefits, though the City has an internal commuter benefits program for its employees. The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality mandates that employers with more than 100 employees provide commute options to encourage employees to reduce auto trips to the work site. Regionally, the Westside Transportation Alliance is the only Transportation Management Association in Washington County and a 2017 Travel Options Assessment identified that expanded travel options programs are needed. There is an opportunity for the City to review its development code and determine if it should require or encourage Trip Reduction Programs in new employment locations that do not qualify under the DEQ mandate or in housing developments. Provision of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure could be accomplished either through the City siting these in public locations, or by requiring or encouraging private development to incorporate EV charging on their sites. The City has installed two chargers – one at the Tigard Public Library and one at City Hall – but could greatly expand these efforts. On-site chargers have an estimated 11.9% mitigation of GHG emissions and while EVs are currently more expensive than conventional vehicles it is expected that this will not be the case in the future. The City’s upcoming EV Strategy Plan will explore this particular mitigation in more detail. Table of Contents CHAPTER 8. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 129 Implementing Market Price Public Parking could be incorporated into the City’s parking management program for specific areas of the City. This measure can have a GHG emission reduction of up to 30 percent and can incentivize the use of alternative transportation modes, especially when used in areas with a walkable street grid, high density residential uses, and robust transit options. Areas such as Downtown Tigard and the Tigard Triangle may be good candidates for parking pricing, especially as the trail system continues to be built out, density increases, and high capacity transit is planned. 8.2.1. Lighting and Landscaping There are five measures for GHG reductions that are not directly related to transportation but that could be accomplished in conjunction with planned transportation projects:  Require Higher Efficacy Public Street and Area Lighting  Replace Incandescent Traffic Lights with LED Traffic Lights  Design Water-Efficient Landscapes  Create New Vegetated Open Space  Expand Urban Tree Planting As a transportation project is developed, the associated landscaping and lighting can be planned to further the City’s GHG reduction goals. 8.3. Emerging Technologies Currently, there are several emerging transportation technologies and trends that the City must plan for during the 20-year TSP planning period:  Micromobility services (including their impact on first-mile, last-mile trips)  Electrification  Shared Mobility (e.g. car share programs) and Ride Hailing  Autonomous Vehicles (AV) and Connected Vehicles (CV)  Mobility as a Service (MaaS)  Big Data (public-private partnerships, deep learning and artificial intelligence systems to predict traffic patterns, congestion, and roadway safety)  Shifts in parking need and behavior While it is not yet necessary to identify exactly how the City will address each emerging transportation technology, it is prudent to identify emerging issues, discuss the reasonably expected impacts on Tigard’s transportation system, and identify the various options for incorporating them to obtain the most benefit for the community. In some cases, the future technologies can drastically benefit local jurisdictions, but in other cases, future technologies and trends can have negative impacts on communities. This section briefly discusses micromobility, electrification, shared mobility, and the long term forecast for AV and CV technology. This is due to the imminent nature of these technologies arriving in Tigard Table of Contents CHAPTER 8. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 130 and the fact that they could have the biggest impact on Tigard’s transportation system and thus warrant deeper discussion and planning. Tigard can explore ways to encourage new mobility services in the City, but also put policies in place early to manage them as these users are added to City streets. 8.3.1. Shared micro-mobility Shared bicycle and scooter programs reduce the need to own and maintain a personal bicycle, provide flexible options for residents and visitors to travel, and help connect riders to transit. These programs are already in place in Portland, run by private companies, and at this time all active programs use electric bicycles and scooters. The City should work toward implementing shared micro-mobility solutions such as electric scooters and electric bike share within the City, especially in denser areas that can support these programs such as Downtown and the Tigard Triangle. Putting electric vehicle charging infrastructure in place to support these services can be done in conjunction with plans for electric vehicle infrastructure. 8.3.2. Electrification Personal electric vehicles have been available to the public for some time, and while conversion from traditional to electric vehicles may not reduce SOV trips, it can have positive environmental impacts that further the City’s goals. While the City cannot control electric vehicle ownership, it can encourage the use of electric vehicles with the installation of more charging stations and encouraging new development to install charging stations on their property. These strategies and others will be explored in the Electric Mobility Strategy. 8.3.3. Car Sharing and Ride Hailing A host of new mobility options have entered the transportation scene since the last TSP. These include on-demand and/or shared vehicles that can help to fill mobility gaps for Tigard residents. Transportation Network Companies (TNC’s), also known as ride hailing companies, are on-demand vehicles reserved through a smartphone app that provide door-to-door transportation. Car sharing is a system of on-demand car rentals where the vehicles are located throughout the service area and individuals can rent them through the computer or an app for a few hours up to a few days. TNC companies already operate in Tigard, but at this time there are no car sharing companies operating in the City. These services reduce the transportation barriers for individuals that don’t own a vehicle, make it easier for households to choose not to own a vehicle, and provide flexibility and access to a variety of travel modes. As discussed in Chapter 5, Tigard recently entered an agreement with the City of Portland for administration of licensing and fees for ride hailing services operating in the City, which will provide a new source of revenue for City projects. 8.3.4. Autonomous Vehicles (AV) and Connected Vehicles (CV) The Tigard TSP outlines the path for investments in the Tigard’s transportation system through 2040, but the Table of Contents CHAPTER 8. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 131 commitment to improving the system does not end there. AV and CV technology is still being tested, and there are a wide range of predictions for when it will be mainstream but planning for it extends beyond the 20- year TSP horizon. AV and CV technology can transform how cities manage, operate, and invest in their streets. Given the revolutionary potential of AVs and CVs, the City of Tigard should do its best to prepare for the future arrival of this technology on city streets. AVs and CVs could result in significant changes in travel. Specific AV and CV impacts on the City of Tigard may include:  Reduced potential for collisions  Traffic flow benefits  Increased access and travel options  Increase in VMT  Reduced parking demand  Increased curb activity (i.e., pick-ups/drop offs)  Potential for redevelopment in commercial areas of the City due to reduced parking demand  Increase in neighborhood cut-through trips  Decreased transit ridership 8.3.5. How the City of Tigard Can Prepare for Emerging Technologies Outlining a pathway to address new transportation technologies will prevent a reactionary approach and reduce the risk of being caught “flat-footed” when the technology reaches Tigard. Such a proactive approach will ensure that the City can minimize negative impacts while ensuring that the community benefits from the technology. Tigard should consider undertaking some or all of the following steps in the near- and mid-term to prepare for the arrival of new transportation options:  Begin community and stakeholder engagement early to allow time for everyone to understand what the impacts will be from these technologies and the tools available to cities for addressing them.  Track and monitor federal and state developments and lobby and advocate for Tigard’s interests.  Plan infrastructure needs and build data and computing capacity.  Work with Metro to accommodate the data, communication, and computing needs of vehicles in the future.  Consider expanding the existing fiber optic network in priority areas to replace existing copper wire based networks.  Develop an inventory of AV-ready assets, asset gaps, and future upgrades that may be necessary.  Consider land use impacts and whether new technologies will put pressure on the suburban character of Tigard, given that some will allow people to live further from job centers.  Plan for impacts to transit. AVs and CVs are expected to make it easier to travel by car, which will potentially reduce transit ridership, while shared micro-mobility could be sited to connect more people to transit. Table of Contents CHAPTER 8. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 132 Regardless of the methods taken to prepare for the arrival of new technology, any level of preparedness will greatly serve the Tigard community. 8.4. Transportation Planning Toolbox & Tracking Our Progress Over Time As the City anticipates growth over the next 20 years, it must find solutions to manage the impacts on the transportation system. Increases in roadway capacity through widening existing roads or constructing new roads are often prohibitively expensive in terms of construction costs, right of way acquisition and impacts to adjacent properties. While expansion of roadway capacity is a component of the 2040 TSP, a greater emphasis is placed on measures to manage the existing roadway system and to increase the convenience and viability of active transportation modes. A range of alternative solutions to traditional roadway widening projects were considered during the development of the 2040 TSP. They include solutions to enhance the quality and availability of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit systems to shift travel demand toward a more balanced system. Also included are measures to improve the traffic operations on the existing system. Preparing for the Future Although internal combustion energy (ICE) powered motor vehicles represent the primary mode of travel in Tigard today, significant change is projected within the 2040 TSP horizon. To meet Tigard’s ambitious land use plans and support a transition to a more climate-friendly transportation system, significant increases in walking, bicycling, and transit mode shares are essential. Similarly, Tigard’s transportation investments must support the transition to electric-powered mobility solutions. This will be accomplished through building and maintaining effective infrastructure for active modes. Transit Investments: Public Transit Connections Tigard has an opportunity to gain federal, state and regional investments for significant transit improvements. While the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Line has been stalled, the City can still plan the system to ensure that future land development, transit access and local circulation will support transit investments. Additionally, the rise of flexible transit options such as first/last mile connector shuttles, circulator shuttles, and on-demand transit provide opportunities to expand transit access outside of fixed route service. Connectivity and Circulation: Local Mobility Connectivity in Tigard is severely challenged by Highway 217, I-5, and the railroad as well as Fanno Creek, Bull Mountain, and other natural features. These challenges are exacerbated by a built environment that precludes efficient connections through the prevalent use of cul-de-sacs and other dead-end streets. One of the priorities of the 2040 TSP is to identify and preserve potential opportunities for future connectivity improvements in order to protect and maximize the function of the existing transportation network. Land Use Patterns: Developing for Efficient Transportation The types, intensities and locations of different land uses are major determinants of travel patterns. Land use patterns in the City of Tigard and surrounding areas are suburban in character, with residential areas separated from commercial areas and a relatively low density of development overall. This development pattern results in travel demand that is highly directional according to typical weekday peak periods. Tigard has adopted plans for a more compact urban form in several areas including Downtown, the Tigard Triangle, and the Washington Square Regional Center (WSRC). The 2040 TSP supports such land use strategies to mitigate the strain on the roadways by shortening home-to-work trips, supporting transit service, and making walk/bike trips more viable for work, shopping and other activities. County and Regional Partnerships Facilitating partnerships with other regional agencies provides opportunities for joint funding, also many roadways/facilities cross jurisdictional boundaries so a continuous, well connected system relies on cooperation. Examples of this are Pacific Highway (OR 99W) which is an ODOT facility that crossing numerous cities; the planned Upper Boones Ferry Road/Durham Road/72nd Avenue circulation study; and ongoing development in River Terrace. Transportation Planning Toolbox TIGARD ON THE MOVE | 2040 Transportation System Plan Table of Contents CHAPTER 8. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 134 8.5. Systemwide Performance Measures Systemwide performance measures are used to understand how progress on projects and policies translates into progress on TSP goals. The TSP is a living plan and the measures are used as checkpoints to understand where progress is occurring and not occurring, so that redirection can occur, if necessary. Table 17. Potential Systemwide Performance Measures TSP GOAL POTENTIAL SYSTEMWIDE PERFORMANCE MEASURE Providing a safe, comfortable, and connected transportation system for all users, especially pedestrians and other vulnerable users. Miles of pedestrian and bicycle facilities constructed each year Downward trend in serious/fatality collisions and those that involve a pedestrian or cyclist. Percent of streets that meet Complete Streets criteria Supporting environmental and community health by reducing our carbon footprint, minimizing impacts to natural resources, and addressing unequal health impacts of our transportation system on low-income communities and communities of color. Implementation of greenhouse gas reduction strategies Downward trend in VMT per capita Improving quality of life for all, particularly historically marginalized and underserved communities, by providing access to jobs, schools, and essential services with convenient and affordable travel options. Percentage of population with access to:  Comfortable walkways and bikeways  Local and regional transit Percent of community with a 10-minute walk of a developed park Percent of residents living within walking distance of essential services Creating livable neighborhoods that are designed to improve multimodal connections while discouraging unsafe interactions, such as speeding. Reduction in speeding complaints Annual implementation of citywide traffic calming program Table of Contents CHAPTER 8. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN NOVEMBER 2021 TIGARD ON THE MOVE: 2040 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN - PAGE 135 Table 17. Potential Systemwide Performance Measures TSP GOAL POTENTIAL SYSTEMWIDE PERFORMANCE MEASURE Supporting economic vibrancy by accommodating the movement of people and goods and creating equitable opportunities for economic development throughout Tigard. Percent of Tigard neighborhoods that are “20-minute” neighborhoods Making the most of transportation resources by leveraging funding opportunities, not overbuilding our system, and making investments that reduce ongoing system maintenance and preservation costs. Number of projects funded by SDCs Amount of grant funding received Percent of roadways that meet maintenance service standards City of Tigard December 6, 2021 2040 TSP Planning Commission Public Hearing Purpose of Hearing •Review proposed update to the Transportation System Plan (TSP) •Review proposed amendments •Consider public testimony The Transportation System Plan TIGARD ON THE MOVE,the City of Tigard’s 2040 Transportation System Plan (2040 TSP) charts a roadmap for providing equitable mobility in our community over the next 20 years. The Transportation System Plan is an ancillary document to Tigard’s Comprehensive Plan TIGARD ON THE MOVE,the City of Tigard’s 2040 Transportation System Plan (2040 TSP) charts a roadmap for providing equitable mobility in our community over the next 20 years. The 2040 TSP Serves As: A blueprint for transportation investments A coordination tool with regional agencies & local jurisdiction An important component of prudent & effective land use choices A compilation of existing & future transportation needs related to pedestrians, bicycles, transit, automobiles, freight & emerging technologies. “Tigard’s transportation system advances our Strategic Vision to be an equitable community that is accessible, walkable, and healthy for everyone.” 2040 TSP Vision and Goals Key Themes Key Themes Completing Our Streets to Serve Everyone •Recognize that our streets play host to more than just cars. •We can do this by: ✓Completing the system for walking and biking ✓Reviewing speed limits ✓Making the most of 2-3 lane cross sections where planned 5-lane sections would drastically increase costs and impact neighborhoods and conditions for active transportation Key Themes Breaking Connectivity Barriers with OR-217 Crossings •Prioritize two new active transportation crossings of OR-217: ✓SW 95th Avenue ✓Tigard Triangle •Adequate vehicle connections into the Triangle are also considered Key Themes Continuing to Invest in Our Trail System •Moving forward with key projects: ✓Closing gaps and improving roadway crossings on Fanno Creek trail ✓Design and construction of the Red Rock Creek Trail ✓Modernization/upgrades to existing trails Key Themes Highlighting Bottleneck Issues & Roadway Alignment Opportunities •Thinking systemically and improving circulation by advancing needed transportation studies to identify right-sized solutions at locations such as: ✓North Dakota Street/Tiedeman Avenue/Greenburg Road area ✓Scoffins Street/Hunziker Street alignment at Hall Boulevard Key Themes Partnering on Regional Mobility Solutions •Many important improvements aren’t fully within Tigard’s jurisdiction, such as: ✓Upper Boones Ferry/72nd Avenue/Durham Road Circulation Study ✓99W Regional Investment Strategy ✓Bull Mountain Corridor upgrades ✓Partnering to improve transit access, speed & reliability •These projects require regional coordination, but Tigard can be a leader in carrying these efforts forward Public Involvement Public Involvement Public involvement for the development and review of the 2040 TSP was achieved in several ways: •Involvement by citizens on the Community Advisory Committee (CAC) •Targeted digital and printed advertisements •Assistance and review by agency representatives on a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) •Public hearings as part of the adoption process •Virtual events and online surveys Transportation Needs and Infrastructure Improvements New Sidewalk Prioritization Bike Network Improvements Transit System Improvements Modal Plans & Projects Modal Plans •Pedestrian •Bicycle •Motor Vehicle •Transit •Freight Constrained Project List by Mode Project List By Cost Implementation Activities Implementation Activities In addition to projects and program, the TSP recommends several additional activities and topic areas to support implementation: •Vehicle and transportation system electrification •Transportation sector GHG reduction strategies •Posted speed zone reductions on several roadways •Future TSDC methodology updates to support city affordable housing objectives •Future Tigard Development Code updates •Micro-mobility transportation options •Curbside management and parking Proposed Amendments Proposed Amendments •Comprehensive Plan •Chapter 12: Transportation •Development Code •Minor updates to Chapter 18.660 Proposed Amendments •Comprehensive Plan: Chapter 12 •New and updated language •Updated overarching goals •References, rather than lists detailed policies •Updated findings Proposed Amendments •Development Code: Minor updates to 18.660 •Cross sections and right-of-way requirements for SW 72nd Ave within the Tigard Triangle •Bike Parking, access, above ground utilities, screening, other minor housekeeping changes Potential Future Amendments •Updated cross sections for all roadways •Changes to off-street parking standards •Bicycle parking at transit facilities •Notice to transportation agencies •Traffic impact analysis refinements •Significant effect on state facilities •Vehicle electrification •Mobility hubs Staff Recommendation & Decision Alternatives Staff Recommendation •Recommend approval to City Council to adopt the 2040 TSP as an ancillary document to the Comprehensive Plan •Recommend approval to City Council of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA-2021-00006) •Recommend approval to City Council of the proposed Development Code Amendment (DCA-2021-00004) Decision Alternatives •Recommend approval to Council with no changes. •Recommend approval to Council with minor changes. •Continue hearing to a date certain to consider public comments or major changes. Next Steps Next Steps •Public Hearings •Planning Commission reviews (December 2021) and City Council considers (January 2022) adoption of 2040 TSP, and amendments to Comprehensive Plan and Development Code. •2022 and beyond: Plan Implementation Thank you Good Evening My name is George Brandt. I am a member of the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee. I have lived in Tigard for about 9 years now, and my wife was raised in Tigard. I have served the committee since 2017. As a member of TTAC, I also served on the Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Project - Community Advisory Committee. I am here tonight to support the adoption of the 2040 TS P and the related amendments to the city's Comprehensive Plan and Development Code. In my time serving the City of Tigard, pedestrian and bicycle safety have been my primary interest. I am especially concerned with pedestrian and bicycling infrastructure a round Tigard’s schools. The 2040 TSP increases the focus on creating livable neighborhoods that are designed to improve multimodal connections while discouraging unsafe interactions. The 2040 TSP also recognizes the importance of working on filling in Tigard’s sidewalk and bicycle infrastructure to create high comfort and low-stress bicycle and pedestrian facilities. For these reasons, I support the adoption of the 2040 TSP and the related amendments to the city's Comprehensive Plan and Development Code. Thank you. Good Evening I am Ruth Harshfield, Chair of the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee. I am a long time resident of Tigard, moving here in 1989. My career included many years working statewide to promote transportation safety. As a member of TTAC, I also served on the Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Project - Community Advisory Committee. I have found this process to be very positive. I am here tonight to share my support for the adoption of the 2040 TSP and the related amendments to the city's Comprehensive Plan and Development Code. Through the CAC meetings I found that many of the key findings identified compliment the opinions of TTAC members. We often discuss the fact that although motor vehicle travel will continue to be the primary mode of travel, creating better opportunities for alternative modes is essential. We want to see improved connectivity in the existing system, and a change to land use patterns to shorten home-to-work trips, support transit and make walking and biking more viable to reduce congestion. We are concerned with the potential negative impacts to neighborhoods and active travel modes of widening roadways to improve traffic flow, there needs to be a balance. High comfort and low-stress bicycle and pedestrian facilities are seen as vital while transit service is viewed as an alternative to private automobile travel. We are very aware that funding is limited and transportation improvements require strategic investment to maximize the value for all people who use the transportation system. The Goals of the 2040 TSP also resonate with TTAC including: • Supporting environmental and community health by reducing our carbon footprint, minimizing impacts to natural resources, and addressing unequal health impacts/outcomes of our transportation system. • Improving quality of life, by providing access to jobs, schools, and essential services with convenient and affordable travel options. • Creating livable neighborhoods that are designed to improve multimodal connections while discouraging unsafe interactions. • Supporting economic vibrancy by accommodating the movement of people and goods and creating equitable opportunities for economic development. • Making the most of transportation resources by leveraging funding opportunities, not overbuilding our system, and making investments that reduce ongoing system maintenance and preservation costs. Dave Roth and the staff and consultant team that worked on this plan have developed a new strategic vision for Tigard’s future, emphasizing developing a multi-modal transportation system that is safe, walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. As a long-range planning tool for Tigard it will ensure our transportation system can meet community needs. For these reasons, I support the adoption of the 2040 TSP and the related amendments to the city's Comprehensive Plan and Development Code.