08/07/1991 - Minutes f
NPO 3 MINUTES
August 7, 1991
Present: Porter, Froude, Garner, Hansen, Mortensen, Bishop (excused), Smith
(absent)
We had a joint meeting with NPO 7 and had a presentation from Liz Newton on the
proposed new ordinance on RV storage,and a long discussion between members on new
fence requirements. There was a new resident present - Mr. Reid- who has encountered
a problem siting a fence on his new lot and home. He requested we vote for the new
ordinance because the existing one is too restrictive.
We jointly heard a presentation by David Bantz of Otak Engineering on a proposed
subdivision for MB Development Company on property east of SW 132nd, south of
Walnut. This proposal will come before City Planning Commission on Monday,
August 19, 1991 , case number 91-0009.
NPO 3 then went into our own meeting. We continued discussion on Otak - MB
Development proposal. Herman Porter commented this new proposal was inadequate
as the Gaarde Street extension because of the proposed size. He proposed we reject
it and if the City Council decides on an alignment that goes through the proposed MB
Development property to exist on SW 132nd. NPO 3 would concur in this plan, but if
another alignment which makes a new intersection, other than an existing one, on
SW Walnut, then the first proposal would be preferable.
NPO 3 Motion - "Move to deny this proposal on the grounds the Gaarde Street
extension through this proposed subdivision has not been included
in the plan because the alignment for Gaarde Street extension has
not been reconciled between NPO 3 proposal and Tigard
Transporation staff proposal."
Passed unanimously, we recommend strongly the City Council make Gaarde Street
extension a priority to bring to a conclusion now.
Approved annexation request by Brajawich because of septic tank failure.
RV Storage Proposed Ordinance
• We suggest a number be attached to the RV storage units allowed such as 1, 2,
3...
• Make RV storage mandatory on private property rather than parked permanently ,.
in the street as in some areas.
• Explore and communicate ways that older neighborhoods can put in place or
renew CC and R's to enforce new ordinance or to make rules the people in the
individual neighborhoods would like put in place in their neighborhoods.
Fences
• NPO 3 requests that someone knowledgeable on this ordinance come to our NPO
meeting in September.
We did not take a position yet. We had many questions and discussed at length. We
would request the wording before the "C" - probably "A" and "B" of the Code TMC
18.102.020 - Visual Clearance: Required.
Submitted by,
4Bverly�Fr de
Acting Secretary
NP03MIN.807
loginvo