10/29/1992 - Minutes OGT -,Z0 - g2 P R 1 �34 ORPAC P . 01
Bill Gross
1103S SU 135th
Tigard, OR 97223
Tel: 524-6325
October 29, 1.992
Liz Newton
Tigard Community Development
13125 SU Hall
Tigard, OR 97223
Tel: 639-4171
Fax: 684-7297
RE: SPECIAL NPO #7 MEETING; THURSDAY, OCTOBER 29, 1992-7=00 PM
MEETING. CRLLEO TO ORDER RT 7:00 PM.
ROLL CRLL
Present= Uoolery, Blanchard, Cunningham, Dorsett, Gross, Howden,
McGlinchy.
REUIEU OF CPR 91-OOOSfZOA 91-0006: NEU COMMUNITY COMMERCIRL DISTRICT
Members considered whether to endorse or oppose the recent revisions to
the Plan and ordinance texts for this new district.
Members reconsidered the merit of this new district.
Motion: Ed Howden; to endorse, in general, this new district in order
to allow possible nearby shopping opportunities for Tigard's neighbor-
hoods.
Second: Cal Uoolery; In Favor: 6; Against: 1 ; Rbstain= 0.
Members considered the merit of the new scale criterion which requires
that the zoning districts within one-half. mile of this district must
average no less than eight dwelling units per acre:
1 . It is a criterion which might be practical for urban medium
and high density neighborhoods, but not for Tigard's suburban
low density neighborhoods; and
NPO 7 MEETING-OCTOBER 29_ 1992 PAGE 1
OCT _ :5 0 - 9 2 PRI :54 O RPA C • P _ 0 2
2. It denies Tigard's low density suburban neighborhoods of poss-
ible nearby shopping opportunities.
Motion: Jin Blanchard; to oppose the new density criterion in order to
allow more possible community commercial sites.
Second: Kat Dorsett; In favor: 7; Against: 0; Abstain: 0.
Katy � -
Members considered the merit of the new locational criterion which ex-
plicitly allows the City to limit the size of this district to less
than eight acres to ensure consistency with other Plan policies and
locational criteria.
Motion: Bill Gross; to endorse the new site size limitation criterion
in order. to ensure that possible community commercial sites would be
compatible with nearby neighborhoods.
Second: Ed Howden; In Favor: 6; Against: 1 ; Abstain: 0.
Members considered the merit of the new locational criteria which allow
conditions of approval for this district at any future site such as,
BUT NOT LIMITED TOS access, setbacks, buffers, parking, coordinated de-
sign and operating hours.
Motion: Bill Gross; to endorse the new conditions of approval criteria
in order to ensure neighborhood compatibility.
Second: Katy Dorsett; In Favor: 7; Against:. 0; Abstain: 0.
Members considered the merit of the new design guidelines and standards .
for this new district.
Motion: Lee Cunningham; to endorse the new design guidelines and stand-
ards and propose that the new design guidelines become mandatory design
standards in order to ensure neighborhood compatibility.
Second: Ed Howden; In Favor: 6: Against: 0; Abstain: 1 .
Motion: Larry McGlinchy; to propose that the planners consider possible
environmental standards for this new district as well.
Second: Katy Dorsett; In Favor: 6; Against: 0: Abstain: 1 .
Members considered the merit of possible design guidelines or standards
for existing districts.
NPO 7 MEETING-OCTOBER 29, 1992 PAGE 2
OCT.--,30 - 92 FR I, �3S ORPAC • P . 03
Motion: Lam McGlinchy; to oppose any design guidelines and standards
for existing districts.
Second: Ed HIden; In Favor: 4; Rg ainst: 3; Rbstain: 0.
t
Chairman Uoolery will present our positions on the recent rev ions to t �
the Plan and ordinance texts for this district atr the Planning Commiss-
ion's public hearing on November 2, 192.
MEEETIHG ROJOURHEO V-25 PM.
Respectfully submitted, +
Bill Gross, Secretary
HPO 7 MEETING-OCTOBER 29. 1992 PAGE 3