Loading...
02-10-2014 - Packet III .4I Completeness Review TIGARD for Boards, Commissions and Committee Records CITY OF TIGARD Planning Commission Name of Board, Commission or Committee 2/10/14 Date of Meeting I have verified these documents are a complete copy of the official record. Doreen Laughlin Print Name 2NID4, 1:nilik,Qt„_ Signature 12/4/14 Date 1:\Records\Forms-Instructions\Boards & Committee Procedures - 12/04/2014 Page 1 City of Tigard T» Planning Commission Agenda MEETING DATE: February 10, 2014; 7:00 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard—Town Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL 7:00 p.m. 3. COMMUNICATIONS 7:02 p.m. 4. CONSIDER MINUTES 7:03 p.m. 5. PUBLIC HEARING — COSTCO GAS STATION CUP2013-00002 7:05 p.m. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and Tigard Triangle Design Evaluation Team approval for the construction of a members-only retail fuel station located at the existing Costco site. The station is proposed at the northeast corner of the site currently used for parking. The facility consists of a 73 foot by 102 foot canopy with three fueling islands, nine fuel dispensers and four underground storage tanks. The proposal also includes reconfiguration of the parking area surrounding the proposed fuel station and landscaping. 6. BRIEFING— FIELDS SITE DEVELOPMENT 8:05 p.m. 7. BRIEFING— SW CORRIDOR/BALLOT MEASURE 8:35 p.m. 8. OTHER BUSINESS 8:55 p.m. 9. ADJOURNMENT 9:00 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA— FEBRUARY 10, 2014 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 1 Agenda Item: 5 Hearing Date:February 10.2014 Time:7:00PM STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Nos FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD 120 DAYS = 4 16 2014 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: COSTCO FUEL STATION CASE NOS: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2013-00002 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and Tigard Triangle Design Evaluation Team approval for the construction of a members-only retail fuel station located at the existing Costco site. The station is proposed at the northeast corner of the site currently used for parking. The facility consists of a 73 foot by 102 foot canopy with three fueling islands,nine fuel dispensers and four underground storage tanks. The proposal also includes reconfiguration of the parking area surrounding the proposed fuel station and landscaping. APPLICANT/ Costco Wholesale APPLICANT'S Barghausen Consulting OWNER: David Rogers REP: Engineers, Inc. 999 Lake Drive Angelo Bologna Issaquah,WA 98027 18215 72nd Avenue South Kent,WA 98032 LOCATION: 7850 SW Dartmouth Street;WCTM 1S136CD,Tax Lot 02200. ZONE: C-G: General Commercial District. The C-G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a city-wide and even regional trade area. Except where non-conforming, residential uses are limited to single-family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini-warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.620, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.765, 18.780,18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Planning Commission find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the Approval Standards for a Conditional Use as outlined in this report. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approval: COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 1 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY SITE WORK: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Agnes Kowacz, 503-718-2427. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 1. Prior to any ground disturbance work, the project arborist shall perform a site inspection for tree protection measures, document compliance/non-compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to the city manager or designee within one week of the site inspection. 2. Prior to any ground disturbance work, the applicant shall submit to the city the current Inventory Data Collection fee for urban forestry plan implementation. 3. The project arborist shall perform semimonthly (twice monthly) site inspections for tree protection measures during periods of active site development and construction, document compliance/non-compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to the project planner within one week of the site inspection. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: MIKE MCCARTHY 503-718-2462. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 4. Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover street improvements, public utility issues, and any other work in the public right-of- way. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Depart.nnent will delay processing of project documents. a. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition (and any subsequent versions or updates)." 5. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall develop,implement, and record signed agreements for an access/parking management plan that includes the establishment of an agreement(s) with neighboring property owner(s) to use some of their off-site parking for Costco employee parking during peak seasons in order to replace the 84 spaces removed for the fueling station. The applicant shall submit the agreement to the city. 6. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall obtain approval from the city engineer and other appropriate agencies confirming that pollution controls and protection measures are in place and functioning properly before allowing the under canopy drainage to flow into the sanitary sewer. 7. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall obtain city approval of a site plan with calculations of the net change in impervious area. If this net change is more than 1,000sf, stormwater detention is required. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 2 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 8. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall obtain city approval of plans to retrofit the northern driveway so that all trucks to Costco can stay within the curb lines of the driveway as they enter the site. 9. Prior to issuance of a site permit, the applicant shall obtain approval from TVF&R for access and hydrant location. 10. Prior to issuance of a site permit,the applicant shall obtain a 1200-C-N General Permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Agnes Kowacz 503-718-2427. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 11. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall contact the Staff Planner, Agnes Kowacz, 503-718-2427 for final walk-through. All site improvements must be completed per approved plans. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ATTN: MIKE MCCARTHY 503-718-2462. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 12. Prior to final building inspection, all elements of the proposed infrastructure (such as transportation, sanitary sewer, storm drainage,water, etc.) systems shall be in place and operational with accepted maintenance plans. 13. Prior to final building inspection,the applicant shall have completed the retrofit of the northern driveway so that all trucks to Costco can stay within the curb lines of the driveway as they enter the site. 14. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall make a proportional share contribution of $525,000 towards the cost of mitigating this development's traffic impact along Hwy 99W, particularly at its intersection with SW Dartmouth Street. 15. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall contribute $26,361 towards the cost of mitigating this development's traffic impact along SW Dartmouth Street,particularly at its intersections with SW 72nd Avenue and SW 68th Avenue. 16. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant's engineer shall submit a final access report to city engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and street connections to be used by site traffic are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by the City and AASHTO. THIS APPROVAL MUST BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE DECISION. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 3 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Proposal: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and Tigard Triangle Design Evaluation Team approval for the construction of a members-only retail fuel station located at the existing Costco site. The station is proposed at the northeast corner of the site, which is currently used for parking. The facility consists of a 73 foot by 102 foot canopy with three fueling islands, nine fuel dispensers, and four underground storage tanks. The proposal also includes reconfiguration of the parking area surrounding the proposed fuel station and landscaping. Site History: Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property and found that a Site Development Review and a Planned Development Review (SDR93-00018 & PDR93-00010) were approved to construct the original building for the Costco warehouse and associated site improvements. In 1999, a minor modification (MMD1999-00002) was approved for a 10,000 square foot addition and restriping of the existing parking lot. Lastly, in 2007 a minor modification (MMD2007-00011) was approved to allow the planting of an additional 52 parking lot trees to satisfy the original 1993 permit conditions of approval. Vicinity Information: The subject site is located at 7850 SW Dartmouth Street; west of SW Dartmouth Street and bound to the north and west by SW Pacific Hwy and Hwy 217. The property, located within the Tigard Triangle Plan District, is zoned General Commercial (C-G) with a Planned Development (PD) overlay. All surrounding properties are also zoned C-G. Commercial development is located to the east and proposed for the property to the south (Walmart). Neighbor Comments: The applicant held a formal neighborhood meeting on April 11, 2013 with one neighbor in attendance. Neighbor concern focused on conflicts between fuel truck access and other vehicular traffic using the driveway. The city has not received any written comments from neighborhood residents. SECTION IV. REPORT MAKING PROCEDURES. PERMITS AND USE Use Classification Chapter 18.130 defines the Use Categories used in the Development Code. The proposed Costco Fuel Station is defined as a vehicle fuel sales use (18.130.060.S) and is permitted as a conditional use in the C-G zone. The existing Costco sales-oriented retail use is a permitted use in the C-G zone and is proposed to continue. Summary of Land Use Permits and Decision-making Procedures Section 18.330.020.A states that a request for approval for a new conditional use shall be processed as a Type III-HO procedure, as regulated by Chapter 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A and subject to other requirements in this chapter. The Type III-HO procedure is a quasi- judicial procedure that applies discretionary approval criteria. Type III-HO actions are decided by the Hearings Officer with appeals being heard by the City Council. The applicant has also requested a Tigard Triangle Design Evaluation Team (DET) approval, which is processed as a Type III-PC procedure and reviewed by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may approve an alternative design to the Tigard Triangle standards by granting an adjustment meeting the criteria of 18.620.090.C. In cases such as this one where more than one land use review is requested, they may be reviewed concurrently using the procedure providing the greatest level of notice and review,in this case,the Type III-PC procedure. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA Staff has reviewed the proposal for consistency with the following code sections. Findings for these code sections are in Section VI of this report. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 4 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION A. Applicable Development Code Standards 18.330 - Conditional Use 18.360 - Site Development Review 18.620 -Tigard Triangle Plan District 18.705 -Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 - Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 - Landscaping and Screening 18.765 - Off-Street Parking and Loading 18.790 - Urban Forestry Plan 18.810 - Street and Utility Improvement Standards SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS A. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS AND APPROVAL CRITERIA Conditional Use (Chapter 18.330) 18.330.010 Purpose A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. The a-pplicant requests approval of a vehicle fuel sales use on the subject site. The following standards in this ciapter ensure the proposed development will not adversely impact surrounding uses and public facilities. 18.330.030 Approval Standards and Conditions of Approval A. The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; As described in the applicant's narrative, the 14.86 acres site is adequately sized to accommodate the needs of the proposed vehicle fuel station. This standard is met. 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography and natural features; The site is approximately 14.86 acres in size and new fuel station canopy will occupy one percent of the total site area. The site's size and shape can accommodate adequate parking, landscaping and circulation. The site is relatively flat with grades of approximately 3.5 percent. There are no natural features within the location of the proposed fuel station; the station will be located within an existing parking lot. This standard is met. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and As described in the applicant's impact study in Section 2.0 of their submittal, there is adequate capacity in the public facilities that serve the site. The frontage improvements along SW Dartmouth Street, including bicycle facilities (on the east side only), have already been constructed. The proposal does not require any additional water connections. A limited amount of runoff is anticipated from the canopy area; this area will be hydraulically separated from the rest of the site and routed through an oil/water separator prior to discharging to the sanitary sewer system. The proposed project will not increase stormwater runoff; however, the project will improve fifty percent of the overall site to comply with current water quality standards. This standard is met. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 5 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION The proposed site is zoned C-G (PD). Table 18.520.2 includes development standards in commercial zones related to lot size, width, coverage, and building setbacks, height, and landscape requirements. The table below compares the applicable standards of the base zone,the additional standards required for a vehicle fuel sales use (see 18.330.050.B.7),with the proposed development. TABLE 18.520.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN COMMERCIAL ZONES STANDARD C-G CU Vehicle Fuel Sales Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 10,000 N/A -Detached unit - - -Boarding,lodging, - - rooming house Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. None N/A Minimum Setbacks -Front yard 0 ft.[11] 10 min/40 max ft. 58'8" -Side facing street on - 40 ft. N/A. corner&through lots[1] -Side yard 0/20 ft.[8] 0 ft. 89'7"/1,736' -Side or rear yard abutting - 20 ft. more restrictive zoning district N/A -Rear yard 0/20 ft.[8] 0 ft. 343'7" -Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public or private street. Minimum Building Height N/A I N/A Maximum Building Height I 45 ft 45 ft I 17.5 ft Maximum Site Coverage[2] I 85% I 27% Minimum Landscape 15% I 56.4% Requirement II Minimum FAR[3] I N/A I N/A Minimum Residential N/A N/A Density[4][5][6] Maximum Residential N/A N/A Density[4][5][6][7] [1]The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2]Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3]Applies to all nonresidential building development and mixed use development which includes a residential component. [8]No setback shall be required except 20 feet shall be required where the zone abuts a residential zoning district. [11]There shall be no minimum front yard setback requirement;however,conditions in Chapters 18.745 and 18.795 must be met. FINDING: As shown in the comparative table above, the proposed development meets all of the applicable development standards of the underlying zoning district and the additional standards required for a vehicle fuel sales use, with the exception of the front yard setback. The applicant is applying for an adjustment to the front yard setback requirement as part of this application,which is addressed in detail below. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 6 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050 are met; and Section 18.330.050.B.7 contains the following standards for Vehicle Fuel Sales: a. Minimum lot size shall be 10,000 square feet; b. Setbacks: i. The front yard setback shall be 40 feet; ii. On corner and through lots, the setback shall be 40 feet on any side facing street; and iii. No side or rear yard setback shall be required, except 20 feet where abutting a residential zoning district; c. Fuel tank installation shall be in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code; and d. Building height shall be the same as applicable zoning As discussed above, the comparative table shows that the proposed development meets all of the applicable development standards of the underlying zoning district and the additional conditional use standards for vehicle fuel sales,with the exception of the front yard setback. The applicant is applying for an adjustment to the front yard setback requirement as part of this application, which is addressed in detail below. A building permit is required for the installation of the fuel tank and shall ensure that the tank meets all applicable building and fire codes. 6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; Chapter 18.790, Urban Forestry Plan; and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. FINDING: The supplementary requirements that are applicable in this case include the following chapters of the Community Development Code: 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.620, Tigard Triangle Plan District; 18.705, Access, Egress and Circulation; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Site Parking and Loading; 18.790, Urban Forestry Plan; and 18.810 Street and Utility Improvements Standards. As reviewed below in this report, all supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of the code are either met or conditioned to be met. Site Development Review (Chapter 18.360) 18.360.020 Applicability of Provisions Site development review shall be applicable to all new developments and major modification of existing developments. The proposed vehicle fuel station is a new development. Therefore, the applicable site development review criteria apply. 18.360.090 Approval Criteria The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: The following approval criteria are not applicable to the proposed vehicle fuel sales use: 18.360.090.0 (Exterior Elevations of residential buildings); 18.360.090.E (Privacy and Noise); 18.360.090.E (Shared outdoor area-Multifamily-use);and 18.360.090.G (Landfills adjacent to 100-year Floodplain). Approval criteria 18.360.090.A. (Street and Utility Standards); 18.360.090.D (Buffering, Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses); 18.360.090.K (Landscaping); and 18.360.090.L (Drainage); are discussed elsewhere in this decision. The following are the applicable approval criteria of this section that are relevant to the proposed project: COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE T OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION A. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; The proposed project will be in compliance or conditioned to comply,with all of the applicable requirements of Title 18 as reviewed in this report. B. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: 1. Buildings shall be: a. Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; b. Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; c. Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and d. Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. The proposed fuel station will be located within an existing parking lot and not within any natural drainage areas. The existing trees within the parking lot will be replaced with new trees. The site for the new fuel station is not subject to ground slumping or sliding. The proposed fuel station will be located approximately 367 feet from the existing warehouse which allows for light, air circulation and fire-fighting. The canopy, which provides weather protection, is open on all four sides; therefore. sun/wind orientation does not apply. This standard is met. 2. Innovative methods and techniques to reduce impacts to site hydrology and fish and wildlife habitat shall be considered based on surface water drainage patterns, identified per Section 18.810.100.A.3. and the City of Tigard "Significant Habitat Areas Map." Methods and techniques for consideration may include, but are not limited to the following: a. Water quality facilities (for infiltration, retention, detention and/or treatment); b. Pervious pavement; c. Soil amendment; d. Roof runoff controls; e. Fencing to guide animals toward safe passageways; f. Re-directed outdoor lighting to reduce spill-off into habitat areas; g. Preservation of existing vegetative and canopy cover. According to the City of Tigard "Significant Habitat Areas Map," the subject site does not include any habitat areas. The narrative states that the under-canopy area will be hydraulically isolated from the rest of the site and routed through and oil/water separator prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer system. The proposal will not increase stormwater runoff, therefore; there will be no impact to the capacity of the downstream system. The new fuel station is proposed to preserve existing vegetation and trees to the extent possible. This standard is met. H. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention—Nonresidential development. 1. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and 2. These areas may be defined by, but not limited to: a. A deck,patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine, b. A trellis or arbor, c. A change in elevation or grade, d. A change in the texture of the path material, e. Sign, or f. Landscaping. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 8 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION The site is clearly defined along SW Dartmouth Street by a landscaping buffer and elevation change between the sidewalk and the existing Costco parking lot. There is a sidewalk and pedestrian walkways that lead from the front of the building into the associated parking lot and to SW Dartmouth Street. The parking lot and walkways are lighted for safety. The proposal includes enhancements to the site landscaping along SW Dartmouth Street which will better define public and private areas. This standard is met. I. Crime prevention and safety: 1. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; 2. Interior laundry and service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; 3. Mailboxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; 4. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and 5. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The proposed development plans were submitted to the Tigard Police Department for review. The Department commented on the proposal and had no objections. Most of the crime and safety standards relate to residential uses and areas having heavy pedestrian and vehicular traffic. The proposed vehicle fuel station is restricted to daytime activity and will have fueling facility attendants to monitor the area during business hours. In addition,close circuit cameras are proposed to be installed as well.This standard is met. J. Public transit. 1. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route; 2. The requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: a. The location of other transit facilities in the area, and b. The size and type of the proposal; 3. The following facilities may be required after city and Tri-Met review: a. Bus stop shelters, b. Turnouts for buses, and c. Connecting paths to the shelters. The nearest transit facilities are bus line #12, #64 and #94, which run on Pacific Highway, approximately 175 feet from the site. The nearest bus stop is located on Pacific Highway, north of SW Dartmouth Street, approximately 525 feet away from the site. The proposal was referred to TriMet for review and comment; however, no response was received. This standard is met. M. Provision for the disabled. All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447. The proposal has been designed in accordance to the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447- Plumbing,Architectural Barriers. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, all of the applicable site development review standards have been fully met. Tigard Triangle Design Standards (18.620): 18.620.010 Purpose and Applicability COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 9 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION A. Design principles. Design standards for public street improvements and for new development and renovation projects have been prepared for the Tigard Triangle Plan District. These design standards address several important guiding principles adopted for the Tigard Triangle Plan District, including creating a high-quality mixed use employment area, providing a convenient pedestrian and bikeway system within the Triangle, and utilizing streetscape to create a high quality image for the area. B. Development conformance. All new developments, including remodeling and renovation projects resulting in uses other than single family residential use are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. In addition to meeting the design standards described in this chapter and other development standards required by the community development and building codes, such developments will be required to: 1. Dedicate and improve public streets, to the extent that such dedication and improvement is directly related and roughly proportional to an impact of the development; 2. Connect to public facilities such as sanitary sewer,water and storm drainage; 3. Participate in funding future transportation and other public improvement projects in the Tigard Triangle Plan District, provided that the requirement to participate is directly related and roughly proportional to an impact of the development. In 1993, the applicant obtained Site Development Review and Planned Development Review approval (SDR1993-00018/PDR1993-00010) on the subject property for the construction of the Costco warehouse building and associated parking lot which included street and frontage improvements, landscaping, and a water quality facility. The applicant has met a number of conditions of approval associated with the previous approval including dedication of right of way along the SW Dartmouth frontage. Public facilities improvements not completed with the previous approvals will be conditions of the current proposal. This standard is met. According to the applicant's narrative, the proposed development is already connected to sanitary sewer, and storm drainage systems. Water is provided by Tualatin Valley Water District; however, no new water connection is proposed. This standard is met. The applicant's narrative states that the applicant will contribute a proportionate share to future transportation funding. Payment of the Transportation Development Tax at the time of building permit issuance will satisfy this standard. This standard is met. C. Conflicting standards. The following design standards apply to all development located within the Tigard Triangle Plan District within both the C-G and the MUE zones. If a standard found in this section conflicts with another standard in the development code, standards in this section shall govern. 18.620.020 Street Connectivity A. Demonstration of standards. All development must demonstrate how one of the following standard options will be met. Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of Section 18.370.010 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. 1. Design option. a. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet. b. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more than 330 feet. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 10 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PANNING COMMISSION 2. Performance option. a. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight street intersections per mile. b. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance. c. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than 1-1/2 the straight-line distance. The proposed development is adjacent to SW Dartmouth Street, just south of the intersection with SW Pacific Highway. SW Dartmouth is identified as a major arterial in the Tigard Triangle District Plan Street and Accessway Standards, which connects to SW Pacific Highway, a principal arterial (Tigard TSP). The subject property and adjacent properties have a direct connection to adjacent properties as well as direct access to SW Dartmouth Street. SW Dartmouth Street provides pedestrian facilities along the frontage of the property and to the north to SW Pacific Highway. Bicycle facilities are only provided along the east frontage of SW Dartmouth Street. This standarc is met. 18.620.30 Site Design Standards B. Compliance. All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one acre or larger a phased development plan must be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010.C.2, governing criteria for granting a variance, is satisfied. 1. Building placement on major and minor arterials. Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50% of all street frontages along major and minor arterial streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on major and minor arterial streets. See Diagram 1 for some examples of how this standard may be met. The SW Dartmouth Street frontage is 762 feet; the canopy is 102 feet wide, which occupies 13% of the frontage. The applicant is asking for an adjustment from this standard through the Design Evaluation Team (DET) process. The DET met on October 21, 2013 to discuss the request and recommends approval of the adjustment with conditions. Therefore,if the adjustment is granted, this standard is met. 2. Building Setback. The minimum building setback from public street rights-of-way or dedicated wetlands/buffers and other environmental features shall be 0 feet; the maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. According to the applicant's site plan (Sheet DD11-15) and narrative, the building setback along the SW Dartmouth Street frontage ranges from 58 feet to 73 feet, as the lot curves. The applicant is asking for an adjustment from this standard through the Design Evaluation Team (DET) process. The DET met on October 21, 2013 to discuss the request and recommends approval of the adjustment with conditions. Therefore,if the adjustment is granted, this standard is met. 3. Front yard setback design. Landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path must be provided between a structure and a public street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one street, the required improvements shall be provided on all streets. Landscaping shall be developed to the applicable standard in paragraph 5 of this subsection A. Hard-surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Benches and other street furnishings are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.520.040B and Table 18.520.2. The applicant's narrative and site plan (Sheet DD11-15) shows the proposed canopy will be set back fifty- eight (58) feet from the front property line at the closes point. The setback area is covered with a landscaping buffer and hard-surfaced access. There are also pedestrian connections from the street to the main entrance of the warehouse building. This standard is met. 4. Walkway Connection to Building Entrances - A walkway connection is required between a building's entrance and a public street or accessway. This walkway must be at least six feet wide and be paved with scored concrete or modular paving materials. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 11 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Building entrances at a corner near a public street intersection are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.520.040B and Table 18.520.2. There is an existing 8-foot-wide concrete sidewalk along SW Dartmouth Street and internal, raised pedestrian walkways from the sidewalk to the building entrances as shown on the site plan (Sheet DD11- 15). This standard is met. 5. Parking location and landscape design. Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on the side, parking is limited to 50% of the street frontage and must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 landscape standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 landscaped area is eight feet or is equal to the building setback,whichever is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to an L-2 landscape standard, except where a side yard abuts a public street where it shall be landscaped to an L-1 landscape standard. See Diagram 2 below. The site has an existing parking lot that is located along the entire frontage of SW Dartmouth Street, which will not change. The proposed fuel station will be located in the northeast corner of the existing parking lot. Parking is located behind an existing landscaped area of which a majority it eight (8) feet in width, a small portion towards the north accessway is 6.5 feet. The landscaped area appears to meet the L- 1 landscaping requirements as shown on the applicant's existing tree plan (Sheet L-1 and L-2). This standard is met. 18.620.40 Building Design Standards A. Non-residential buildings. All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010 .C.2, criteria for granting a variance, are satisfied. 1. Ground Floor Windows - All street-facing elevations within the Building Setback (0 to 10 feet) along public streets shall include a minimum of 50% of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings. The ground floor wall area shall be measured from three feet above grade to nine feet above grade the entire width of the street-facing elevation. The ground floor window requirement shall be met within the ground floor wall area and for glass doorway openings to ground level. Up to 50% of the ground floor window requirement may be met on an adjoining elevation as long as all of the requirement is located at a building corner. The proposed structure is a fuel station canopy and does not contain any windows or doors. This standard does not apply. 2. Building Facades. Facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing at least one of the following features: (a) a variation in building materials; (b) a building off-set of at least 1 foot; (c) a wall area that is entirely separated from other wall areas by a projection, such as an arcade; or (d) by other design features that reflect the building's structural system. No building facade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building. As shown in the elevation drawings, the proposed canopy on the east elevation adjacent to SW Dartmouth Street is 102 feet in length. The canopy is supported by a vertical structural column which provides articulation and variation. This standard is met. 3. Weather Protection. Weather protection for pedestrians, such as awnings, canopies, and arcades, shall be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk or a hard-surfaced expansion of a sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or accessway.Awnings and canopies shall not be back lit. As shown in the elevation drawings, the entire canopy will serve as weather protection for fueling customers. This standard is met. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 12 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 4. Building Materials. Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete or plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than two feet. Building materials for the proposed fuel canopy are described on the elevation drawings and include prefinished metal fascia panels and prefinished metal columns. The proposal does not include any prohibited materials. This standard is met. 5. Roofs and Roof Lines. Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the building and should respect the building's structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted. The roof of the proposed canopy is flat and designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the existing Costco warehouse. No false fronts or false roofs are proposed. This standard is met. 6. Roof-Mounted Equipment. All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so that exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. Solar heating panels are exempt from this standard. The applicant's narrative states that "no roof-mounted equipment will be installed". This standard does not apply. 18.620.50 Signs A. Sign standards. In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.780 of the development code the following standards shall be met: 1. Zoning district regulations. Residential only developments within the C-G and MUE zones shall meet the sign requirements for the R-25 zone in Section 18.780.130.B; nonresidential developments within the C-G zone shall meet the sign requirements for the commercial zones in Section 18.780.130.C; and nonresidential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone in Section 18.780.130.D. 2. Sign area limits. The maximum sign area limits found in Section 18.780.130 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle Plan District. 3. Height limits. The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roof line of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted within the Tigard Triangle Plan District. 4. Sign location. Freestanding signs within the Tigard Triangle Plan District shall not be permitted within required L-1 landscape areas. The applicant's narrative states that new signage will comply with the sign regulations for the C-G zone and Tigard Triangle Plan District. This standard is met. 18.620.060 Entry Portals Required locations. Entry portals shall be required at the primary access points into the Tigard Triangle Plan District. A. Location. Entry portals shall be located at the intersections of 99W and Dartmouth; 99W and 72nd; I-5 and Dartmouth; Hwy. 217 and 72nd; and at the Hwy. 217 overcrossing and Dartmouth. B. Design. The overall design of entry portals shall relate in scale and detail to both the automobile and the pedestrian. A triangle motif and at least two trees according to the L-2 standard shall be incorporated into the design of entry portals. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 13 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION The subject property is not located adjacent to a primary entrance point into the Tigard Triangle. This standard does not apply. 18.620.070 Landscaping and Screening Applicable levels. Two levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle Plan District. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other subsections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. A. L-1 parking lot screen. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on public streets. The L-1 standard is in addition to other standards in other chapters of this title. The setback shall be a minimum of eight feet between the parking lot and public street. L-1 trees shall be considered parking lot trees and spaced between 30 and 40 feet on center within the setback. All L-1 trees shall be a minimum of 31/2 inch caliper at the time of planting. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a three-foot high screen and a 90% opacity within one year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two years. B. L-2 general landscaping,The L-2 standard applies to all other trees and shrubs required by this chapter and Chapter 18.745 (except those required for L-1 parking lot screen). For trees and shrubs required by Chapter 18.745, the L-2 standard is an additional standard. L- 2 trees that are also street trees, median trees, and trees required to frame entry portals shall be selected in conformance with Table 18.620.1 of this section. If conformance with Table 18.620.1 is precluded by physical constraints caused by public utilities or required public improvements, the director may approve alternative selections. All L-2 trees shall be a minimum of 21/2-inch caliper at the time of planting. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two years. The site is directly served by SW Dartmouth Street and the L-1 landscape and screening standard applies. As shown on the existing tree plan (Sheet L-1 and L-2) a majority of the street frontage along SW Dartmouth Street is buffered with an existing 8-foot landscape setback; however, there is a small portion towards the north accesssway that is 6.5 feet. The existing buffer contains screening that meets the intent of the L-1 standard. This area is planted with Honeylocust, Purple Leaf Flowing Plum, Scarlett Oak and Vine Maples. A portion of the landscape area is within the visual clearance triangle of the north entrance, but those plantings will be maintained to stay below the 3-foot visual clearance area. In response to the DET recommendation, the applicant was conditioned to provide a denser buffer directly in front of the area where the fuel station is proposed to mitigate certain impacts. The applicant has done so as shown on the landscape concept plan (Sheet L-9). This standard is met. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the Tigard Triangle Plan District design standards have been fully met. 18.620.090 Design Evaluation A. Purpose. It is recognized that the above design standards are to assist in upgrading and providing consistency to development within the Tigard Triangle Plan District. It is recognized that different designs may be used to meet the intent of the standards and purpose statement of the Tigard Triangle Plan District standards. With this in mind, applicants for development in the Tigard Triangle Plan District may choose to submit proposed projects which demonstrate compliance with the design standards or request adjustments from the plan district design standards and submit design plans for review and recommendation by a city design evaluation team. This option allows applicants to COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 14 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION propose alternative designs to the plan district design standards that are consistent with the purpose of the standards. When a structure which has nonconforming elements is partially or totally damaged by fire or other causes beyond the control of the owner, the structure may be rebuilt using the same structure footprint without receiving an adjustment from design standards. B. Design evaluation team (DET). Evaluation of the adjustment to allow an alternative design is made by a three-person professional design team contracted by the city for professional design review. The DET shall consist of design professionals with experience in architecture, landscape architecture and civil engineering. This team is charged with balancing the purpose statements, goals and standards of the Tigard Triangle Plan District design process with the alternative proposal submitted by the applicants. The DET shall accept design proposals that vary from any of the plan district design standards. This process is to be applied only to the Tigard Triangle Plan District design standards. Applicants must comply with all other development code standards according to the regular development review requirements of Title 18 of this code. The DET will prepare a report outlining conditions and recommendations in response to the applicant's proposal(s) for submission to the Planning Commission within 30 days of meeting on the proposal. C. Approval criteria. For guidance in evaluating the purpose of the design standards, the DET shall refer to the planning director's interpretation that provides purpose statements for the Tigard Triangle Plan District design standards. All adjustments to allow an alternative design are subject to the following criteria: 1. Granting the adjustment will continue to meet the purpose of the standard(s) to be modified in an acceptable alternative manner; and 2. The proposal will not significantly detract from the livability or appearance of an area and the proposal will be consistent with the desired character of the area; and 3. If more than one adjustment is being requested, the cumulative effect of the adjustments as well as each individual adjustment results in a project which is still consistent with the overall purpose, goals and standards of the zone; and 4. Granting the adjustment is the minimum necessary to allow the proposed use of the site, and any impacts resulting from the adjustment are mitigated to the extent practical. The DET met on October 21,2013 and reviewed the following adjustments requested in this application: 1. Adjustment from the minimum 50% building placement standards along SW Dartmouth Street. 2. Adjustment to the maximum 10 foot setback from SW Dartmouth Street,approximately 73 feet. The DET discussed the proposed adjustments and whether the request meets the intent of the Tigard Triangle design standards. The intent is to create a high quality development with a streetscape that contributes to the image of the area and provides convenient and pedestrian friendly connections. The discussion included concerns about the large setback from Dartmouth Street, the queuing of vehicles to use the fueling station, building/canopy articulation, amount and size of signage, creating and maintaining a pedestrian environment (particularly activating the northeast corner near the entrance), and screening the parking along Dartmouth Street. With these concerns in mind, the DET felt that the intent of the Tigard Triangle design standards could still be met as long as they were mitigated through certain conditions. The DET has recommended approval of the applicant's adjustment requests with the following conditions: 1. Minimize the proposed setback by moving the entire structure toward SW Dartmouth Street a minimum of 6 to 8 feet or more if possible. 2. The landscaping and screening along SW Dartmouth Street where the gas station will be located shall be increased to mitigate glare resulting from vehicle headlights, screen the parking spaces along the frontage and provide a more inviting pedestrian environment. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 15 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDING: The applicant has submitted a site plan that meets the DET recommended conditions of approval. A copy of the DET report is attached as a part of this staff report,Exhibit"D". Access. Egress and Circulation (Chapter 18.705) 18.705.020 Applicability of Provisions A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. B. Change or enlargement of use. Should the owner or occupant of a lot or building change or enlarge the use to which the lot or building is put, thereby increasing access and egress requirements, it is unlawful and is a violation of this title to begin or maintain such altered use until the provisions of this chapter have been met if required or until the appropriate approval authority has approved the change. The applicant submitted a site plan (Sheet DD11-15), which shows the existing pedestrian circulation. No streets, off-street parking or auto accessways are proposed. This standard is met. 17.705.030 General Provisions D. Public Street Access: All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030H and 18.705.030I shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. The site has two existing accesses onto SW Dartmouth Street. No other access is proposed. This standard is met. F. Required walkway location. On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: 1. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; The applicant's site plan shows existing five foot walkway connections between SW Dartmouth Street to the existing Costco warehouse as well as circulation around the proposed fuel station. This standard is met. 2. Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; This standard does not apply to the proposed vehicle fuel sales use. 3. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum three-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; As stated in the applicant's narrative and shown in the applicant's site plan (Sheet DD11-15), the existing walkways are 5 feet wide and separated from the vehicle access driveways by curbs. Pavement markings COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 16 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION are used when crossing drive aisles. The existing walkways comply with ADA standards. This standard is met. 4. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, other pervious paving surfaces, etc. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. As described in the applicant's narrative, the existing walkways are constructed of concrete and lighted with overheard lighting for safety purposes. This standard is met. 030.H. Access Management 1. An access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT,Washington County, the City and AASHTO (depending on jurisdiction of facility.) 2. Driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from city engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. 3. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. 4. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. Access to the site is from SW Dartmouth Street. The two existing driveways to the site are approximately 617 feet apart. No new access is proposed. The existing driveway locations are well over 300 feet from the existing driveways to the south of the site. There is an existing driveway, approximately 50 feet, to the north of the site. This standard is met. It has been observed that the existing north entrance, which will be utilized by fuel trucks for the new fuel station, does not provide adequate space for the large vehicles to make this turn within curb lines. Public Works Engineering has noted in their comments on the application that the applicant should retrofit this driveway to correct this operations/safety problem. Through field observations, the queuing of vehicles, particularly at the existing southern entrance, sometimes extends onto SW Dartmouth Street. This is due to pedestrian crossings as well as customers looking for an available parking space. The loss of parking from the proposed fuel station results in the likelihood of traffic queuing onto SW Dartmouth Street. To mitigate for this impact, this decision should be conditioned so that the applicant must develop, implement, and record signed agreements for an access/parking management plan that includes the establishment of an agreement(s) with neighboring property owner(s) to use some of their off-site parking for Costco employee parking during peak seasons in order to replace the 84 spaces removed for the fueling station. This standard can be met as conditioned. J. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use. 1. Vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.3 (for greater than 100 required parking spaces, one 50- • COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 17 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION foot access width with 40-foot minimum pavement width). Per Table 18.765.2, a minimum of 441 and a maximum of 905 parking spaces are required for the proposed and existing use. The applicant's site plan (Sheet DD11-15) shows the two existing accessways, the north at 30 feet and the south at 40 feet. This standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, all of the applicable access, egress and circulation standards have not been fully met but can be met with the stated conditions of approval. Environmental Performance Standards (18.725) These standards require that federal and state environmental laws, rules and regulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 (Performance Standards) regulates: Noise,visible emissions,vibration and odors. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Visible Emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. FINDING: The proposed vehicle fuel sales use would not typically generate unacceptable levels of noise, visible emissions, vibrations, odors, glare, heat, or attract insects and rodents. To ensure compliance, any activities that would generate unacceptable adverse effects would be subject to the enforcement provisions of the Tigard Municipal Code. Landscaping and Screening (18.7451 18.745.030 General Provisions A. Maintenance responsibility. Unless otherwise provided by the lease agreement, the owner, tenant and his or her agent, if any, shall be jointly and severally responsible for the ongoing maintenance of all landscaping and screening used to meet the requirements of this chapter according to applicable industry standards. B. Installation requirements. The installation of all landscaping and screening required by this chapter shall be as follows: COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 18 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 1. All landscaping and screening shall be installed according to applicable industry standards; 2. All plants shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nursery Stock (ANSI Z60, 1-2004, and any future revisions); and 3. All landscaping and screening shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. C. Certificate of occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the requirements of this chapter have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the city such as the posting of a bond. The accepted planting procedures are the guidelines described in the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual. These guidelines follow those set forth by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) tree planting guidelines as well as the standards set forth in the most recent edition of the American Institute of Architects' Architectural Graphic Standards. In the Architectural Graphic Standards there are guidelines for selecting and planting trees based on the soil volume and size at maturity. Additionally, there are directions for soil amendments and modifications. 18.745.040 Street Trees A. Street trees shall be required as part of the approval process for Conditional Use (Type III), Downtown Design Review (Type II and III), Minor Land Partition (Type II), Planned Development (Type III), Site Development Review (Type II) and Subdivision (Type II and III) permits. B. The minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet. When the result is a fraction, the minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by rounding to the nearest whole number. C. Street trees required by this section shall be planted according to the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. D. Street trees required by this section shall be provided adequate soil volumes according to the Street Tree Soil Volume Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. E. Street trees required by this section shall be planted within the right of way whenever practicable according to the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. Street trees may be planted no more than 6 feet from the right of way according to the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual when planting within the right of way is not practicable. F. An existing tree may be used to meet the street tree standards provided that: 1. The largest percentage of the tree trunk immediately above the trunk flare or root buttresses is either within the subject site or within the right of way immediately adjacent to the subject site; 2. The tree would be permitted as a street tree according to the Street Tree Planting and Soil Volume Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual if it were newly planted; and 3. The tree is shown as preserved in the Tree Preservation and Removal site plan (per 18.790.030.A.2),Tree Canopy Cover site plan (per 18.790.030.A.3) and Supplemental Report (per 18.790.030.A.4) of a concurrent urban forestry plan and is eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. G. In cases where it is not practicable to provide the minimum number of required street trees, the Director may allow the applicant to remit payment into the Urban Forestry Fund COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 19 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION for tree planting and early establishment in an amount equivalent to the City's cost to plant and maintain a street tree for three (3) years (per the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual) for each tree below the minimum required. The site already has street trees planted along SW Dartmouth Street,which were required as part of the previous Site Development Review and Planned Development Review (SDR93-00018&PDR93-00010) approval.The site plan shows fifteen existing Littleleaf Linden street trees planted approximately 40 feet apart. This standard is met. 18.745.50 Buffering and Screening A. General provisions. 1. It is the intent that these requirements shall provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution at a development site, without unduly interfering with the view from neighboring properties or jeopardizing the safety of pedestrians and vehicles. 2. Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening, shall be required as specified in the matrix. The site is surrounded by similar commercial uses to the south and east.An L-1 parking lot screen is required along the eastern perimeter of the property. The existing tree plan (Sheet L-1 and L-2) shows that the existing trees and landscaping meet the L-1 screen standards. No other buffering or screening is required. This standard is met. E. Screening: special provisions. 1. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas: a. Screening of parking and loading areas is required. In no cases shall nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas (i.e., nonconforming situation) be permitted to become any less conforming. Nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas shall be brought into conformance with the provisions of this chapter as part of the approval process for conditional use (Type III), downtown design review (Type II and III), planned development (Type III), and site development review (Type II) permits only. The specifications for this screening are as follows: i. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; ii. Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off- street parking areas from the public right-of-way; iii. Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; iv. All parking areas, including parking spaces and aisles, shall be required to achieve at least 30% tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the parking area in accordance with the parking lot tree canopy standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 20 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION The existing parking lot tree plan (L-3 and L-4) shows parking lot trees distributed throughout the parking lot that provide 160, 315 square feet of canopy coverage. The parking lot and loading area is approximately 377, 873 square feet and the trees provide approximately 42%canopy. This standard is met. 2. Screening Of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; The narrative states that the proposal does include installation of clean air separator and electrical transfer box will be located within the landscape area just south of the proposed fuel station. The facilities will be screened with shrubs. All existing facilities are also screened by landscaping. This standard is met. 3. Screening Of Refuse Containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. The narrative states that no new refuse containers for the fuel station are proposed and the existing containers for the warehouse will be utilized. The existing containers are located just south of the existing warehouse and screened with a masonry wall. This standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards have been fully met. Off-Street Parking and Loading (18.765) 18.765.030 General Provisions y ` B. Location of vehicle parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 200 feet from the building or use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the following exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 300 feet from the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. As shown on the applicant's site -plan (Sheet DD11-15), the parking lot on the site is located adjacent to the existing Costco warehouse anc the proposed fuel station. This standard is met. F. Preferential Long-Term Carpool/Vanpool Parking. Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitors to the site. At least 5% of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 21 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION The proposed fuel station and existing warehouse does not have any long term parking spaces; therefore, this standard does not apply. G. Disabled-Accessible Parking. All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The site plan (Sheet DD11-15) shows twenty-one existing ADA handicap spaces located at the main entry to the building. This standard is met. 18.765.040 General Design Standards B.Access drives. With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: 1. Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; 2. The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.705,Access, Egress and Circulation; 3. Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences,walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; 4. Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795,Visual Clearance; 5. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt, concrete, or pervious paving surface. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained; and 6. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Section 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right- of-way will be required. The proposed access drive meets the requirements of Chapter 18.705, is clearly marked, and is designed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site. Accessways will be maintained to provide clear visual clearance areas. This standard is met. D. On-site vehicle stacking for drive-in use. 1. All uses providing drive-in services as defined by this title shall provide on the same site a stacking lane for inbound vehicles as noted in Table 18.765.1. The applicant's site plan (Sheet DD11-15) shows 118 feet from the curb to the nearest fuel pump. This meets the required 75 feet. This standard is met. F. Pedestrian Access. Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. The applicant's site plan (Sheet DD11-15) shows that the proposed pedestrian access is provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. There are no drop-off grade separated areas within the parking area. Therefore, this standard is met. I. Parking lot striping. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 22 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEr1RING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off street parking requirements as contained in this chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and 2. All interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The applicant's site plan (Sheet DD11-15) shows that parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping. This standard is met. J. Wheel Stops. Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant's site plan (Sheet DD11-15) shows a wheel stop next to the parking island close to SW Dartmouth Street and just south of the fuel station next to the pedestrian walkway. The remaining parking spaces are either interior or rely on low lying landscape material on the boundary. This standard is met. N. Space and Aisle Dimensions. No more than 50% of the required spaces may be compact spaces. 1. Except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: a. 8.5' x 18.5' for a standard space; b. 7.5' x 16.5' for a compact space; and c. As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; d. The width of each parking space includes a stripe which separates each space. 2. Aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width; 3. Minimum standards for a standard parking stall's length and width, aisle width, and maneuvering space shall be determined as noted in Figure 18.765.2. According to the applicant's site plan (Sheet DD11-15), the parking lot space and isle dimensions meet the applicable design standards. This standard is met. 18.765.050 Bicycle Parking Location and Access. A. Location and access. With regard to the location and access to bicycle parking: 1. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; 2. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; 3. Outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; 4. Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. B. Covered parking spaces. 1. When possible,bicycle parking facilities should be provided under cover. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 23 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2,'10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 2. Required bicycle parking for uses served by a parking structure must provide for covered bicycle parking unless the structure will be more than 100 feet from the primary entrance to the building, in which case, the uncovered bicycle parking may be provided closer to the building entrance. As shown in the site plan (D11-13) the applicant has proposed bicycle parking adjacent to the main entrance to the warehouse. The parking will be covered by the warehouse canopy and visible from the parking area. This standard is met. C. Design requirements. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: 1. The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for longterm (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; 2. Bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground,wall or other structure; 3. Bicycle parking spaces shall be at least two and one-half feet by six feet long, and, when covered,with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; 4. Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; 5. Required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; 6. Areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. D. Paving. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete, other pervious paving surfaces, or similar material. This surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. The applicant's narrative states that a "loop wave" style bike rack will be used similar to the ones already installed at the site. The racks will be securely anchored to the concrete ground with bolts. Each space will provide the required space of 2.5 feet by 6 feet and will be reserved for bicycle parking only. This standard is met. E. Minimum bicycle parking requirements. The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Single-family residences and duplexes are excluded from the bicycle parking requirements. The director may reduce the number of required bicycle parking spaces by means of an adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020.C.5.e. Pursuant to Table 18.765.2, bicycle parking for a vehicle fuel sales use is required at 0.2 spaces/1,000 square feet. Two spaces are required (7,344 square feet of canopy/1,000= 7.344 x 0.2= 1.5) and the applicant has proposed 2 spaces. This standard is met. 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements H. Specific requirements. See Table 18.765.2. Table 18.765.2 states that the minimum parking requirement for a vehicle fuel sales use is three (3) spaces and an additional two (2) spaces for each service bay. The existing warehouse is considered a sales-oriented COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 24 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION retail use and the requirement is three (3) spaces per 1,000 of floor area. Therefore, a minimum of 441 spaces are required (438 spaces for the warehouse and 3 for the fuel station). The site will have 730 spaces after the addition of the fueling station. This standard is met. Exceptions to maximum parking standards.When calculating the maximum vehicle parking allowed as regulated by Section 18.765.080.H,the following exception shall apply: 1. The following types of parking shall not be included: a) Parking contained in a parking structure either incorporated into a building or freestanding; b) Market-rate paid parking; c) Designated carpool and/or vanpool spaces;d) Designated disabled-accessible parking spaces; e) Fleet parking. The applicant has proposed a total of 730 spaces. The site is located within Zone B and the maximum parking allowed for a vehicle fuel sales use is four (4) spaces and an additional 2.5 spaces for each service bay and 6.2 spaces per 1,000 of floor area for a sales-oriented retail use. The maximum allowed is 905 spaces. This standard is met. 18.765.080 Off-Street Loading Requirements A. Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: 1. A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; 2. A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The applicant's narrative states that one off-street loading space is provided for the fuel truck, which is located just south of the fuel station. A separate lane for the truck will allow the truck to park and unload fuel without interruption to other vehicle traffic circulation. This standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking and loading standards have been fully met. Signs (18.780): Requires that a permit be issued for any sign that is erected, re-erected, constructed, structurally altered, or relocated within the City Limits. A wall sign is shown on the elevation drawings facing. The applicant states that they will comply with the requirements of the sign design, location and lighting in Chapter 18.620 and 18.780 at the time of building permit issuance. Therefore, all subsequent signage will be reviewed through a Type I process and will be subject to the code standards in effect at the time of application submittal. FINDING: Because signs will be reviewed and approved as part of a separate permit process, this standard is met. Urban Forestry Plan (18.790) 18.790.030 Urban Forestry Plan Requirements A. Urban forestry plan requirements. An urban forestry plan shall: 1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor (the project arborist), except for minor land partitions that can demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; An Urban Forestry Plan prepared/approved by a landscape architect has been provided. This standard is met. 2. Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual (UFM); The proposed conditional use permit is to construct a new fuel station at the existing Costco warehouse site. A tree preservation and removal plan was submitted identifying all trees proposed for preservation and 52 for removal. The plan meets the tree preservation and removal standards; this standard is met. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 25 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 3. Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; and A existing tree plan (Sheet L-1 and L-2) was provided that identifies the canopy of existing open grown trees. According to the supplemental report, the existing soils on-site are mostly made of silt and clay. The arborist recommends importation of high loan content fill for newly planted trees. The applicant's Urban Forestry Plan shows that the site meets the minimum effective canopy requirements. The project landscape architect has signed the Urban Forestry site plan and attested that the plan meets the tree canopy site plan standards. 4. Meet the supplemental report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. A supplemental report was prepared by the project landscape architect, Art Seidel; Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc and Don Richards;Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. The report includes the required inventory data for the existing open grown trees (UFM Section 10, Part 3, and Subsection D). Protection measures, consisting of a 5 foot metal fence secured to the ground located along the dripline of preserved trees shall be in place prior to any site work. The table below demonstrates the effective tree canopy in accordance with UFM Section 10, Part 3, and Subsection M). Because the site is zoned C-G, the required effective tree canopy is 33% for the entire site. According to the supplemental report, the effective canopy is as outlined below: Square feet of Canopy Percent of Canopy Existing canopy 43,198 6.6% I Newly Planted Trees266,126 41.1% TOTAL CANOPY FOR SITE 309,324 47.7% **This number reflects trees less than 6 inch DBH which are considered as newly planted The required canopy for the entire site is met. B. Tree canopy fee. If the supplemental report demonstrates that the applicable standard percent effective tree canopy cover will not be provided through any combination of tree planting or preservation for the overall development site (excluding streets) or that the 15% effective tree canopy cover will not be provided through any combination of tree planting or preservation for any individual lot or tract in the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 districts (when the overall development site meets or exceeds the standard percent effective tree canopy cover), then the applicant shall provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in the tree canopy fee calculation requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual. The site meets the canopy requirements; therefore, this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the urban forestry plan requirements have been fully met. 18.790.060Urban Forestry Plan Implementation C. Tree Establishment. The establishment of all trees shown to be planted in the tree canopy site plan (per 18.790.030 A.3) and supplemental report (per 18.790.030.A.4) of the previously approved urban forestry plan shall be guaranteed and required according to the tree establishment requirements in Section 11, part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual. FINDING: The newly planted trees are not used to meet canopy requirements; therefore, a tree establishment bond is not required. This standard does not apply. D. Urban forest inventory. Spatial and species specific data shall be collected according to the urban forestry inventory requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual for each open grown tree and area of stand grown trees in the tree canopy site plan (per Section 18.790.030.A.3) and supplemental report (per Section 18.790.030.A.4) of a previously approved urban forestry plan. Section 11, Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual states that prior to any ground disturbance work, the applicant shall provide a fee to cover the city's cost of collecting and processing the inventory data for the entire urban forestry plan. This can be met through a condition of approval. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 26 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the applicable urban forestry inventory standards have not been fully met but can be as conditioned. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795) 18.795.030 Visual Clearance Requirements A. At corners. Except within the CBD zoning district a visual clearance area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to the intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. B. Obstructions prohibited. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge,planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has indicated in the narrative and shown on the site plan (Sheet DD11-15) that there is an existing tree within the visual clearance area at the north accessway. However, the tree will be maintained to provide a clear vision area. FINDING: Based on the analysis above,the visual clearance area standard is met. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Chapter 18.810) Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: 18.810.030 Streets A. Improvements. 1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street 2. No development shall occur unless streets within the development meet the standards of this chapter 3. No development shall occur unless the streets adjacent to the development meet the standards of this chapter,provided, however, that a development may be approved if the adjacent street does not meet the standards but half-street improvements meeting the standards of this title are constructed adjacent to the development. The proposed fuel station fronts onto SW Dartmouth Street which has already been improved to city standards. This standard is met. E. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Unless otherwise indicated on an approved street plan, or as needed to continue an existing improved street or within the Downtown District, street right-of-way and roadway widths shall not be less than the minimum width described below. Where a range is indicated, the width shall be determined by the decision-making authority based upon anticipated average daily traffic (ADT) on the new street segment. (The City Council may adopt by resolution, design standards for street construction and other public improvements. The design standards will provide guidance for determining improvement requirements within the specified ranges.) These are presented in Table 18.810.1 The site is adjacent to SW Dartmouth Street, which is classified as a major arterial in the Tigard Triangle Street Plan. This street has been constructed and the right-of-way has been dedicated in accordance with this plan. This standard is met. CC. Traffic study. 1. A traffic study shall be required for all new or expanded uses or developments under any of the COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 27 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION following circumstances: a. When they generate a 10% or greater increase in existing traffic to high collision intersections identified by Washington County. b. Trip generations from development onto the city street at the point of access and the existing ADT fall within the following range: Existing ADT ADT to be added by development 0-3,000 vpd 2,000 vpd 3,001-6,000 vpd 1,000 vpd >6,000 vpd 500 vpd or more c. If any of the following issues become evident to the city engineer: i. High traffic volumes on the adjacent roadway that may affect movement into or out of the site. ii. Lack of existing left-turn lanes onto the adjacent roadway at the proposed access drive(s). iii. Inadequate horizontal or vertical sight distance at access points. iv. The proximity of the proposed access to other existing drives or intersections is a potential hazard. v. The proposal requires a conditional use permit or involves a drive-through operation. vi. The proposed development may result in excessive traffic volumes on adjacent local streets. 2. In addition, a traffic study may be required for all new or expanded uses or developments under any of the following circumstances: a. When the site is within 500 feet of an ODOT facility; and/or b. Trip generation from a development adds 300 or more vehicle trips per day to an ODOT facility; and/or c. Trip generation from a development adds 50 or more peak hour trips to an ODOT facility. The applicant has submitted a traffic study prepared by Kittelson&Associates,Inc. According to the traffic study "Under the 2014 Total Traffic Conditions Scenario ... the intersection of OR 99W/Dartmouth St-78`h Ave ... does not meet the City of Tigard standards. Several movements on the northbound and southbound approaches to the intersection are projected to operate at a LOS [Level of Service] F and/or v/c [volume/capacity] ratio over 1.0 during both the weekday PM and weekend midday peak hours, as under existing and 2014 background conditions." While the proposed fuel station is not the sole cause of the identified traffic problems at this intersection, as shown in the applicant's study,it will contribute to them. The amount of traffic generated at this intersection by the proposed fuel station is 110 net new trips during the afternoon peak hour and 135 net new trips during the weekend midday peak hour, for an average of 122.5 net new trips during the peak hours. As identified in the applicant's traffic study, the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP) includes a project to mitigate traffic congestion at this intersection by construction of turn lanes and/or auxiliary through lanes, at a cost of$6 million. This project is anticipated to increase the capacity of this intersection by about 1,400 vehicles per hour. The net new trips generated by the proposed fuel station amount to 8.75% of the capacity to be provided by this project. Therefore,as a condition of approval, the applicant shall make a proportional share contribution of 8.75% of the cost of this $6 million project, which equals a contribution of$525,000. This will be paid to the City of Tigard to be deposited in a fund to be used for transportation capacity improvements in this area. Two other intersections in this area have been identified as needing traffic signals;the intersection of 72nd Ave with SW Dartmouth Street and the intersection of 68th Avenue with SW Dartmouth Street and the I-5 Ramps. As development has occurred in the Tigard Triangle,and where a development introduces additional trips to these intersections, funds have been collected from the developers that will contribute to the future capacity improvements and/or reimburse for the installation of needed capacity improvements. The precedent set by previous Council action and land use cases has been a per-trip COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 28 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION charge of$711.62 for each PM Peak Hour trip through the 72nd/Dartmouth intersection and $501.25 for each PM Peak Hour trip through the 68th/Dartmouth intersection. The proposed fuel station (according to the applicant's traffic study) will generate 30 additional peak hour trips through the 72nd/Dartmouth intersection, for a total contribution of$21,349. The proposed fuel station would generate 10 additional peak hour trips through the 68th/Dartmouth intersection, for a total contribution of$5,012. These will be paid to the City of Tigard to be deposited in a fund to be used for transportation capacity improvements in this area. According to the applicant's traffic study "Given that the site is essentially at [parking] capacity during the peak half hour period, the proposed reduction in on-site parking needs to be addressed so that adequate parking supply will still be available on-site for Costco members and shoppers. Costco will pursue agreements with neighboring property owners ... for employee parking during peak periods in order to free up sufficient space for Costco members." , Prior to issuance of a site permit, these agreements need to be established and implemented as part of the access/parking management plan. 18.810.070 Sidewalks B. All industrial streets and private streets shall have sidewalks meeting city standards along at least one side of the street. All other streets shall have sidewalks meeting city standards along both sides of the street. A development may be approved if an adjoining street has sidewalks on the side adjoining the development, even if no sidewalk exists on the other side of the street. There is an existing 8-foot wide sidewalk along the site frontage on SW Dartmouth Street. This standard is met. 18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers A. Sewers required. Sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. This site is served by an existing sanitary sewer system. Drainage from the area under the new canopy will be connected to this sanitary sewer system. There are no identified sanitary sewer concerns in this area and it is anticipated that this limited amount of runoff can be accommodated within the capacity of the existing system. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain approval from the city engineer and other appropriate agencies for the pollution controls and protection measures to be used before this under canopy drainage flows into the sanitary sewer. 18.810.100 Storm Drainage A. General provisions. The director and city engineer shall issue a development permit only where adequate provisions for stormwater and floodwater runoff have been made, and: 1. The storm water drainage system shall be separate and independent of any sanitary sewerage system; 2. Where possible,inlets shall be provided so surface water is not carried across any intersection or allowed to flood any street; and 3. Surface water drainage patterns shall be shown on every development proposal plan. C. Accommodation of upstream drainage. A culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development, and the city engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 29 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION D. Effect on downstream drainage. Where it is anticipated by the city engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the director and engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention. A limited amount of runoff is anticipated from the canopy area; this area will be hydraulically separated from the rest of the site routed through an oil/water separator prior to discharging to the sanitary sewer system. The proposed project will not increase stormwater runoff; however, the project will improve fifty percent of the overall site to comply with current water quality standards. No downstream stormwater issues were identified. This standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the street and utility improvements standards have not been fully met but can be as conditioned. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: Fire and Life Safety: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) is the service provider for fire and emergency services. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Public Water System: Water service is available to the site. Tualatin Valley Water District is the service provider for water in this location. The applicant submitted a Statement of Service Availability from Tualatin Valley District. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. (For Private Facilities) To ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages throughout the project and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard (Inspection Supervisor) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. (For privately maintained Stormwater Management Units) COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 30 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION The proposed unit from Stormwater Management is acceptable, provided the property owner agrees to hire the manufacturer (or approved equal) to provide the required maintenance of the unit. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate that they have entered into a maintenance agreement with Stormwater Management, or another company that demonstrates they can meet the maintenance requirements of the manufacturer. The application did not include a computation of the net change in impervious area resulting from the proposed changes. However,it is apparent that the net change will be less than 1,000sf. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain city approval of a site plan with calculations of the net change in impervious area. If this net change is more than 1,000sf, stormwater detention will be required. The application states that "the project will improve fifty (50) percent of the overall site to current water quality standards with the use of StormFilter catch basins." This will be adequate to meet the water quality treatment requirements. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The Federal Clean Water Act requires that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permit be issued for any development that will disturb one or more acre of land. A 1200CN/1200C Permit will be required if the disturbed areas on site are over one acre and five acres respectively. The plans shall be submitted to the city development engineer for review, approval and subsequent transmittal to CWS. No work shall begin on-site until the permit is obtained. Site Permit Required: A site permit from the Building Division is required before any work begins on the site. Address Assignments: The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard. An addressing fee in the amount of $50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the city prior to issuance of the site permit. For multi-tenant buildings, one address number is assigned to the building and then all tenant spaces are given suite numbers. The city is responsible for assigning the main address and suite numbers. This information is needed so that building permits for tenant improvements can be adequately tracked in the city's permit tracking system. The applicant shall contact Paul Izatt, 503-718-2589 to request a new address for the fuel station. C—IMPACT STUDY SECTION 18.390.040.B.e requires that the applicant include an impact study. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication of real property interest, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 31 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2,'10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION The applicant has provided an impact analysis addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The applicant's plans propose improvements or upgrades as needed to not have any adverse impact on the city infrastructure. Existing public sanitary sewer and water laterals will serve the site. There is no known deficiency in capacity. Since the site is a commercial development, there should be no impact on the City's parks system.A proportional share contribution will be made for the resulting transportation impacts. ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS The Transportation Development Tax (TDT) after adjusting (as requested by applicant because this is a members only station) for higher-than-normal internal (store and gas) trips is $192,528. The TDT has been implemented at a level that would recoup 23.3% of the Countywide cost necessary to provide the transportation system capacity necessary to accommodate new development. The total impact of the proposed development on the transportation system is estimated at the calculated'MT ($192,528) divided by the recapture rate (23.3%),resulting in a calculated amount of$826,299. The required proportional share calculations total$551,361,which is significantly less than the calculated estimated impact of $826,999. The driveway modifications do not count in this calculation because they solely serve the Costco property. Less mitigated costs and credits The proposal requires a proportional share contribution to mitigate traffic congestion at the intersection of 99W and SW Dartmouth Street. The new fuel station will add 110 net new trips to the intersection which amounts to 8.75% of the $6 million project (identified in the TSP), which equals $525,000. The new fuel station will also impact the intersection of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Dartmouth and SW 68th Avenue and SW Dartmouth. The proposal shall contribute $21,239 for the SW 72nd intersection and $5,012 for the SW 68th Avenue intersection.All of these contributions are TDT creditable. FINDING: Based on the analysis above,no TDT is required. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Public Works Department reviewed the proposal and had no comments. The City of Tigard Police Department reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it. The City of Tigard Development Engineering Division has reviewed the proposal and provided findings which are included in the Access, Egress and Circulation section and Street and Utility Improvements Standards section of this report. Recommended conditions are included in the conditions of approval. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Oregon Department of Transportation reviewed the proposal and supports the city in collecting the proportionate share contribution from this development to fund transportation capacity improvements in this area. (Contact Marah Danielson,Development Review Planner, 503-731-8258) Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal and responded that a Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization must be obtained. The proposal shall continue to comply with the conditions set forth in the Service Provider Letter No. 11-000222, dated June 2, 2011. These items will be reviewed during the city's site permit and public facility permit review. Tualatin Valley Water District commented that they had no objections to this project. The following comment was provided by Ryan Smith: 1. Submit plans to the TVWD if public water improvements are required or if new meter or fire line is required. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) reviewed the proposal and had no objections to it. The following comment was provided from John Wolff, Deputy Fire Marshal II;503-649-8577: 1. Assure that adequate fire hydrant is located within 400 feet. COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 32 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Attachments Exhibit A: Development Review Engineering Comments,January 21, 2014. Exhibit B: Vicinity Map Exhibit C: Site Plan, Sheet DD11-15 Exhibit D: DET Report, October 28,2013 Oate PREPARED BY: AHiles Kowacz ' DATE Associate Planner / 2?" REVIEWED $Y: Tom McGuire DATE Assistant Community Development Director COSTCO FUEL STATION PAGE 33 OF 33 CUP2013-00002 2/10/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION EXHIBIT A 1111 " City of Tigard TIGARD Memorandum To: Agnes Kowacz, Associate Planner From: Mike McCarthy P.E., Senior Project Engineer Re: CUP 13-02; Costco Fuel Station, 7850 SW Dartmouth St. Date: January 21, 2014 Access Management (Section 18.705.030.H) Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and/or AASHTO (depending on jurisdiction of facility). The applicant has provided a copy of this access report along with the traffic study for this development. Trucks turning into the Costco property at the north driveway have been observed dragging wheels across the sidewalk, curb ramp, and landscape area because the existing driveway does not provide adequate space for these large vehicles to make this turn within its curb lines. This access route is also proposed for fuel delivery trucks. Prior to public use of the proposed fueling station the applicant shall retrofit this driveway to correct this operations/safety problem so that all trucks to Costco can stay within the curb lines of the driveway as they enter the site. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain city approval of plans to retrofit the northern driveway. Field observations have also observed queuing of entering vehicles, particularly at the southern driveway, that sometimes extends onto Dartmouth St. This is likely due to drivers waiting for pedestrians to cross near the store entrance, and drivers slowing as they consider where they might find an open parking space. The removal of parking spaces for the proposed fueling station increases the scarcity of parking, which would be likely to result in longer queues, especially when some drivers decide to stop and wait for a space to become available. This increases the likelihood of traffic queuing onto Dartmouth St, which would be a public safety issue that needs to be avoided as much as reasonably possible. Prior to public use of the proposed fueling station, the applicant shall develop, implement, and record signed agreements for the long-term maintenance of an access/parking management plan that will minimize the likelihood of queues of entering vehicles extending onto Dartmouth St. Upon completion of the improvements, the applicant's engineer shall submit a final access report to City engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and streets to be used by site traffic are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by the City and AASHTO. The applicant shall obtain approval of this report prior to public use of the proposed parking area. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. No new access connections are proposed. Vehicle queuing from other intersections typically does not block the existing site accesses. This standard is met. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. No new accesses are proposed to arterial or collector streets, nor are any new local streets proposed. While the northern site access is closer than 600 feet to Hwy 99W, left turns are physically prevented by a raised median. This standard is met. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620, Tigard Triangle Street Plan, designates Dartmouth St as a Major Arterial. The Tigard Triangle Street and Accessway Standards requires Major Arterial streets to have a 94-foot right-of-way width. Other improvements required include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways, underground utilities, street lighting, storm drainage, and street trees. This site lies adjacent to SW Dartmouth St, which is classified as a Major Arterial in the Tigard Triangle Street Plan. This street has been constructed and right-of-way has been dedicated in accordance with this plan. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.620.020 of the Tigard Triangle Design Standards includes the street connectivity requirements applicable to this development, stating that all development must demonstrate how one of the following standard options will be met. ... Design Option: a) Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet; and b) Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more than 330 feet. Performance Option: a) Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight street intersections per mile; and b) The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight-line distance; and c) The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from a local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than one and one-half the straight line distance. Street connections in this case are precluded by Hwy 217 to the west and access spacing requirements and intersection influence areas on Hwy 99W to the north. There is an existing pedestrian connection to Hwy 99W to the north. This standard is met. Section 18.810.030.H.2 states that all local, neighborhood routes and collector streets which abut a development site shall be extended within the site to provide through circulation when not precluded by environmental or topographical constraints, existing development patterns or strict adherence to other standards in this code. A street connection or extension is precluded when it is not possible to redesign, or reconfigure the street pattern to provide required extensions. Land is considered topographically constrained if the slope is greater than 15% for a distance of 250 feet or more. In the case of environmental or topographical constraints, the mere presence of a constraint is not sufficient to show that a street connection is not possible. The applicant must show why the constraint precludes some reasonable street connection. Street connections in this case are precluded by Hwy 217 to the west and access spacing requirements and intersection influence areas on Hwy 99W to the north. There is an existing pedestrian connection to Hwy 99W to the north. This standard is met. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. The existing grades along Dartmouth St are less than 10%. No grade changes are proposed to Dartmouth St. This standard is met. Access to Arterials and Major Collectors: Section 18.810.030.Q states that where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or major collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following: • A parallel access street along the arterial or major collector; • Lots of suitable depth abutting the arterial or major collector to provide adequate buffering with frontage along another street; • Screen planting at the rear or side property line to be contained in a non- access reservation along the arterial or major collector; or • Other treatment suitable to meet the objectives of this subsection; • If a lot has access to two streets with different classifications, primary access should be from the lower classification street. The proposal does not include residential properties adjacent to or accessing an Arterial or Major Collector. Private Streets: Section 18.810.030.T states that design standards for private streets shall be established by the City Engineer. The City shall require legal assurances for the continued maintenance of private streets, such as a recorded maintenance agreement. Private streets serving more than six dwelling units are permitted only within planned developments, mobile home parks, and multi- family residential developments. No private streets are proposed with this development. Traffic Study: Section 18.810.030.CC Requires a traffic study for development proposals meeting certain criteria. Mitigation of Transportation Impacts: Policy 1.9 of Tigard's Transportation System Plan states that the City shall require all development to meet adopted transportation standards or provide appropriate mitigations. The applicant has submitted a traffic study prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc. According to that traffic study "Under the 2014 Total Traffic Conditions Scenario ... the intersection of OR 99W/Dartmouth St-78th Ave ... does not meet the City of Tigard standards. Several movements on the northbound and southbound approaches to the intersection are projected to operate at a LOS [Level of Service] F and/or v/c [volume/capacity] ratio over 1.0 during both the weekday PM and weekend midday peak hours, as under existing and 2014 background conditions." While the proposed Costco Fuel station is not the sole cause of the identified traffic problems at this intersection, as shown in the applicant's study, it will contribute to them. The amount of traffic generated at this intersection by the proposed Costco Fuel station is 110 net new trips during the afternoon peak hour and 135 net new trips during the weekend midday peak hour, for an average of 122.5 net new trips during the peak hours. As identified in the applicant's traffic study, the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP) includes a project to mitigate traffic congestion at this intersection by construction of turn lanes and/or auxiliary through lanes, at a cost of$6 million. This project is anticipated to increase the capacity of this intersection by about 1,400 vehicles per hour. The net new trips generated by the proposed Costco Fuel station amount to 8.75% of the capacity to be provided by this project. Therefore, as a condition of approval, the applicant shall make a proportional share contribution of 8.75% of the cost of this $6 million project, which equals a contribution of$525,000. This will be paid to the City of Tigard to be deposited in a fund to be used for transportation capacity improvements in this area. Two other intersections in this area have been identified as needing traffic signals; the intersection of 72nd Ave with Dartmouth St and the intersection of 68th Ave with Dartmouth St and the 1-5 Ramps. As development has occurred in the Tigard Triangle, and where a development introduces additional trips to these intersections, funds have been collected from the developers that will contribute to the future capacity improvements and/or reimburse for the installation of needed capacity improvements. The precedent set by previous Council action and land use cases has been a per-trip charge of$711.62 for each PM Peak Hour trip through the 72nd/Dartmouth intersection and $501.25 for each PM Peak Hour trip through the 68th/Dartmouth intersection. The proposed Costco Fuel station (according to the applicant's traffic study) will generate 30 additional peak hour trips through the 72n /Dartmouth intersection, which gives a calculated contribution of $21,349. The proposed Costco Fuel station would generate 10 additional peak hour trips through the 68th/Dartmouth intersection, for a calculated contribution of$5,012. These will be paid to the City of Tigard to be deposited in a fund to be used for transportation capacity improvements in this area. According to the applicant's traffic study "Given that the site is essentially at [parking] capacity during the peak half hour period, the proposed reduction in on-site parking needs to be addressed so that adequate parking supply will still be available on-site for Costco members and shoppers. Costco will pursue agreements with neighboring property owners ... for employee parking during peak periods in order to free up sufficient space for Costco members." These agreements need to be established and implemented prior to removal of parking spaces. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length, width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.6.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 2,000 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. Street connections in this case are precluded by Hwy 217 to the west and access spacing requirements and intersection influence areas on Hwy 99W to the north. There is an existing pedestrian connection to Hwy 99W to the north. This standard is met. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Section 18.620 requires sidewalks on both sides of the street in the Tigard Triangle. There is an existing sidewalk along Dartmouth St along the frontage of the subject property. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Sewer Plan approval: Section 18.810.090.6 requires that the applicant obtain City Engineer approval of all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prior to issuance of development permits involving sewer service. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. This site is served by an existing sanitary sewer system. Drainage from the area under the new canopy will be connected to this sanitary sewer system. There are no identified sanitary sewer concerns in this area and it is anticipated that this limited amount of runoff can be accommodated within the capacity of the existing system. Prior to obtaining the site permit the applicant shall obtain approval from the City Engineer and other appropriate agencies for the pollution controls and protection measures to be used before this under canopy drainage flows into the sanitary sewer. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2007 and including any future revisions or amendments). Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which require the construction of on- site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed in accordance with the CWS Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Management and shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces of more than 1,000 square feet provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention, but a fee-in-lieu would be required. The application did not include a computation of the net change in impervious area resulting from the proposed changes. However, it is apparent that the net change will be less than 1,000sf. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain city approval of a site plan with calculations of the net change in impervious area. If this net change is more than 1,000sf, stormwater detention will be required. The application states that "the project will improve fifty (50) percent of the overall site to current water quality standards with the use of StormFilter catch basins." This will be adequate to meet the water quality treatment requirements. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. The existing utility lines along Dartmouth St have already been placed underground. Any utilities serving the subject property shall be placed under ground. Fire and Life Safety: The applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) for access and hydrant location prior to issuance of the site permit. Public Water System: Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) provides service in this area. The fueling station is not proposed to be connected to the water system. TVWD approval would be necessary before any connections are made. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The applicant shall meet the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act regarding National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permits that may be needed for this project. The applicant shall follow all applicable requirements regarding erosion control, particularly those of the Federal Clean Water Act, State of Oregon, Clean Water Services, and City of Tigard including obtaining and abiding by the conditions of NPDES 1200-C or 1200-C-N permits as applicable. Site Permit Required: The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.) and driveway construction. This permit shall be obtained prior to approval of the final plat. Survey Requirements Final plats and other survey work on that level shall contain State Plane Coordinates [NAD 83 (91)] on two monuments with a tie to the City's global positioning system (GPS) geodetic control network (GC 22). These monuments shall be on the same line and shall be of the same precision as required for the subdivision plat boundary. Along with the coordinates, the plat shall contain the scale factor to convert ground measurements to grid measurements and the angle from north to grid north. These coordinates can be established by: • GPS tie networked to the City's GPS survey. • By random traverse using conventional surveying methods. In addition, the applicant's as-built drawings shall be tied to the GPS network. The applicant's engineer shall provide the City with an electronic file with points for each structure (manholes, catch basins, water valves, hydrants and other water system features) in the development, and their respective X and Y State Plane Coordinates, referenced to NAD 83 (91). Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Mike McCarthy, 503-718-2462 or mikem@tigard-or.gov) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of a site permit, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover street improvements, public utility issues, and any other work in the public right-of-way. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. Prior to removal of existing parking spaces Costco shall establish agreement(s) with neighboring property owner(s) for 84 spaces of off-site employee parking during peak periods in order to free up sufficient space for Costco members. Prior to obtaining the site permit the applicant shall obtain approval from the City Engineer and other appropriate agencies for the pollution controls and protection measures to be used before the under canopy drainage flows into the sanitary sewer. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain city approval of a site plan with calculations of the net change in impervious area. If this net change is more than 1,000sf, stormwater detention is required. Prior to issuance of the site permit, the applicant shall obtain city approval of plans to retrofit the northern driveway so that all trucks to Costco can stay within the curb lines of the driveway as they enter the site. The applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) for access and hydrant location prior to issuance of the site permit. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition (and any subsequent versions or updates)." The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C-N General Permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO PUBLIC USE OF THE PROPOSED FUELING STATION: Submit to the Engineering Department (Mike McCarthy, 503-718-2462 or mikem@tigard-or.gov) for review and approval: Prior to public use of the proposed fueling station all elements of the proposed infrastructure (such as transportation, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, water, etc.) systems shall be in place and operational with accepted maintenance plans. Prior to public use of the proposed fueling station the applicant shall retrofit the northern driveway so that all trucks to Costco can stay within the curb lines of the driveway as they enter the site. Prior to public use of the proposed fueling station, the applicant shall develop, implement, and record signed agreements for the long-term maintenance of an access/parking management plan that will minimize the likelihood of queues of entering vehicles extending onto Dartmouth St. Prior to public use of the proposed fueling station the applicant shall make a proportional share contribution of $525,000 towards the cost of mitigating this development's traffic impact along Hwy 99W, particularly at its intersection with Dartmouth St. This will be paid to the City of Tigard to be deposited in a fund to be used for transportation capacity improvements in this area. Prior to public use of the proposed fueling station the applicant shall make a proportional share contribution of $26,361 towards the cost of mitigating this development's traffic impact along Dartmouth St, particularly at its intersections with 72nd Ave and 68th Ave. This will be paid to the City of Tigard to be deposited in a fund to be used for transportation capacity improvements in this area. Prior to public use of the proposed fueling station, the applicant's engineer shall submit a final access report to City engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and street connections to be used by site traffic are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by the City and AASHTO. L< S PINE ST VICINITY MAP 7 L., __ CUP2013-00002 t n '= , Costco Fuel Station SP1cUGt Si ,_w THORNST Q f- "r'/ • •e'.2' . ' STEVE Si Villa . Ridge 11 w Q Lu ? . Q z c > may. I, Subject Site z ra CO hl Q¢.G/ O, S . Pal it i I I i-1:-,r-3-' L I . . itflp 1 DA ,_, 7 1 .1, .77 _No , I I I riter • i`��i�• • • .,..... . ► AT L A N ra S r I� I 1 . • • `s a' SI,- 0 f.... ci. lq I Cr 1 i zi! . ....c., : •,, .. %yam :. ., CLINTON ST 03 � �+ _ <'43 Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the �� Development Services Division. S `140 D A T M C}U T H S T b 8 ii, ' !I Approx.Scale 1:8,000-1 in=667 ft ���1 Q al Map printed at 02:57 PM on 08-Jan-14 1w^i • 1.1.37 I DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD 1. 1 MAKES NO WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE u CONTENT,ACCURACY,TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF W ID > THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE H"-i _ -0 I INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. H Iliki 47 f I f' City of Tigard r' 13125 SW Hall Blvd Feet I - limn it Tigard,OR 97223 a 0 1000 M 503 639-4171 ,.�� I www.tigardor.gov TICAt:❑ ��r �na�s n lef..1V r ___ PROJECT DATA EXHIBIT C BASE LINE i.—- ——----— V I I I —__—__-——-K�-- ----I ,�� ` q 44„ ♦ \-. CLIENT: COSTCO WHOLESALE • / ° I I lie U 0 (✓ a 41,-- ® �� 999 LAKE DRIVE e. -',• r� `. ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 / ETE (s�ND __ M EA , , M ^ — 0 RC V i® PROJECT ADDRESS: 7850 S.W.DARTMOUTH 71 .) .16. 4 TIGARD,OR. 97223 / —e B _0 J \\ ,\,, ® SITE AREA: 27.29 ACRES(1,188,962.99 S.F.) 7BA ER , _,I fi..._ JiV O ` .s JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD .1;lL— + O �.� i -� • �. ZONING: C-G(PD) PLANNEDLDEVE DEVELOPMENT ENIST. — �.`.,— � I P r , S scRueSER PRI r.: !_I —:p -I�i .... BOUNDARIES THIS PLAN HAS BEEN WETLAND MEMOSEPARATOR I I I : • , I I l \ ',so INFORMATION: PREPARED BY USING A "E °N MANHOLE CODERS I — 0 — ® FRONTIER LAND SURVEYING I A PPA ETCAGE 2A� y„M� COSTCO • \ ,- PLAN DATED 10/30/13. /? / —�' lel I Il I - 1 11 I I \ LANDSCAPE DATA: o v RECEIVING / f© .4-- ,\ ♦ / ®a•.` EXISTING AREA: 671,325.24 S.F.(56.46%OF SITE) F EXIST.TIRE CENTER 1 P II q II ♦ r PROPOSED AREA: 671,562.34 S.F.(56.48%OF SITE) • �� II - D I B ('13 41 1 --16 ' e '' .;c 'S/_ BUILDING DATA: \I i I EXIST.BINE RAMS- ti` ISS I. 11 1 :I 11 _ 1 _ J .l \ ♦ 91- BUILDING AREA: 140,640 S.F. \ EMT i (15)STALLS _ �- + (` • TIRE CENTER: 5,184 S.F. LOADING DOCK �IKE MONS-(e) -�(ae� i "� • I Su S 1-' fl`-I p1 � , r, ` ,I 1i 1 : 1 - II � - II J•'. ♦ • TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 145,824 S.F. I \ DUST7 —— 0,_ 1_I�Itil "+ .i_,, I I I rl� II ;II��_ 1 ' ';`'s l . IX'SNiFANCE ' ”• .----13 \" I� IrI �I I '''-il l I' I� 9 EXISTING PARKING DATA: AREA OF - •4.•••I ., k41 'L L 6 1 . _ u , V . 1 1 . 1 ° I 'J l .,.,\ PARKING PROVIDED: `\ \ WORK l - "` + — ' ' o 10'® WIDE COMPACT STALLS 32 STALLS _ 4./ NrsalNce � \i, �' II i I- 0 R 1 1 j'� n `� \ __ .:L °""°"�f: i� 4 ll r III II I I f 11 P(1 �"� 10'WIDE STALLS 467 STALLS Li L k l --- \_�_I \. -� •.., r.z,�.' • '/ems E\. :_ ., ' Il. . u u I NI I I I.1 :1- I `. 1e I (-_ ®9'WIDE STALLS 210 STALLS \ �O 1 p 11HC LI..a�\( ..�....4. —' E.-= —, - t� —r r He HANDICAP STALLS 21 STALLS �� _ = _ TOTAL PARKING 730 STALLS \\ �� °_i `9 - t°- n 1 °,. V v t son O I I 13 _\1 ,, NO.OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. \ ° per_ S a= 1S D2 v __® 0- F-- '° V Ii— 0 f E• OF BUILDING AREA:(145,890 S.F.) 5.00 STALLS 11 1 .a Iiii: 7_ ar --1I _ 2, ,2R j �_ a �. I PROPOSED PARKING DATA: —H ° ` I_ - -A-I 0 a a a s• PROPOSED PARKING: c _ i m .: Q 10'WIDE COMPACT STALLS 32 STALLS N ____; — = — c----:' 'c '�' iL ,' '; JL= I [I@' _ q_eri -1, 10'WIDE STALLS 391 STALLS N, r., c_ c __Ti_ ';17---�_�j f- I )J; ®9'WIDE STALLS 202 STALLS T •_ ' — —I ^I I t I I .`�, . -1 ®HD HANDICAP STALLS 21 STALLS /\ : 0— i'(- -4% — _ _ —i -- — TOTAL PARKING 646 STALLS WETLAND osuxEAnoNUNE--/ \ , ,�_ � �(]i o c - 'C �E1y ii 0, 0.1 A 0 r h !` NET PARKING LOSS -84 STALLS \ •C>- ,gig= 4 t__b Q tt. J = -I i1r; I sl1 ' I !i.,' . 0 If, 10'WIDE STALLS -76 STALLS _ yk ' � t � t lt� � ,�� . _ lM ; � ® © O _J , f SSr 9'WIDE STALLS -8 STALLS �\ , ° 19 I 1 III I , _ N - - 1 NO.OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. y �� �'/ WA OF BUILDING AREA:(145,890 S.F.) 4.43 STALLS 1. -IE?" _.,�� ` - r; �, ,. , a 0 NOTES: I d!�®t aT�+"`p6� EXISTING CONDITIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. 6 11. 10 DV NW BTY \ \\\`�u...d.e�11b.�a� Q48� :r I .v+'o1 i�/ I�L.I��� ';pg �® ! �'' — - COSTCO — EXHIBIT D TIGARD City of Tigard October 28,2013 Costco Wholesale Corporation c/o Barghausen Consulting Engineers,Inc. Attn:Angelo Bologna 18215 72„d Avenue South Kent,WA 98032 Re:Design Evaluation Team Response to Costco's Tigard Triangle Design Standards Adjustments Dear Mr.Bologna: The City of Tigard Design Evaluation Team (DET) convened on October 21,2013 to review proposed adjustments to the Tigard Triangle Design Standards as outlined in a letter dated October 11,2013 (Exhibit A). Costco is proposing a new fueling station on property located at 7850 SW Dartmouth Street; the facility would occupy the northeast corner of the site. The applicant is requesting two adjustments,one for a greater setback than allowed on Dartmouth Street,and a second to allow for less than the required minimum 50% building placement along the Dartmouth street frontage. Based on Exhibit A, the DET recommends approval of the requested adjustments providing that the applicant meets the following recommendations and conditions. Applicable City of Tigard Development Code sections. 18.620.030 Site Design Standards A. Compliance. All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one acre or larger a phased development plan must be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010.C.2, governing criteria for granting a variance,is satisfied. 1. Building placement on major and minor arterials. Buildings shall occupy a minimum of50%of all street frontages along major and minor arterial streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on major and minor arterial streets. 2. Building setback. The minimum building setback from public street rights-of-way or dedicated wetlands/buffers and other environmental features shall be zero feet;the maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. Applicant Request: The applicant requests an adjustment from the minimum 50%building placement standard. The proposed canopy structure occupies less than the minimum 50%required of street frontage along Dartmouth Street.The applicant is also requesting a setback of 73 feet from Dartmouth Street. DET Discussion and Recommendation: The DET discussed the proposed adjustments and whether the project with these adjustments still meets the intent of the Tigard Triangle design standards. The intent is to create a high quality development with a streetscape that contributes to the image of the area and provides convenient and pedestrian friendly connections. The discussion included concerns about the large setback 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov from Dartmouth Street, the queuing of vehicles to use the fueling station, building/canopy articulation, amount and size of signage,creating and maintaining a pedestrian environment(particularly activating the northeast corner near the entrance),and screening the parking along Dartmouth Street.With these concerns in mind,the DET felt that the intent of the Tigard Triangle design standards could still be met as long as they were mitigated through certain conditions. The DET recommends approval of the applicant's adjustment requests with the following conditions: DET Conditions: 1. Minimize the proposed setback by moving the entire structure toward.Dartmouth Street a minimum of 6 to 8 feet or more if possible. 2. The landscaping and screening along Dartmouth Street where the gas station will be located shall be increased to mitigate glare resulting from vehicle headlights,screen the parking spaces along the frontage and provide a more inviting pedestrian environment. Sincerely, ........_ _____K ,v.<ti71..,,._:_itAt.-- Brian Feeney Calista Fitz!.:-raid Don Schmidt Costco Loc. No. 111 / BCE #6324 PRE-APP. ASID BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION 1111 . LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION CTO of Tigard Permit Center 13 125 SLY/ Hall Blvd, Tigard, OR 97223 IP gARet Phone: 503. 639.4171 Fax: 503.598. 1960 . , File hi I Other Case # Date I I By I I Receipt # I I Fee I I Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR • Adjustment/Variance (I or II) • Minor Land Partition (II) 11 Zone Change (III) III Comprehensive Plan Amendment (IV) . Planned Development (III) INI Zone Change Annexation (IV) ❑ Conditional Use (III) III Sensitive Lands Review (I, II or III) 1.1 Development Code Amendment (IV) • Historic Overlay (II or III) MI Site Development Review (II) 1.1 Home Occupation (II) 1. Subdivision (II or III) LOCATION WIIERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY \'{MITI, OCCUR (Address if available) Costco Gasoline (Loc. No . 111 ) - 7850 S .W. Dartmouth Street, Tigard, Oregon 97223 TAX MAPS & TAX LOT NOS. 1 S 136CD02200 TOTAL SITE SIZE ZONING C,ASSIFICA7ION 16 .84 acres (647,301 S . F) General Commercial APPLICANT* Costco Wholesale Corporation do Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. MATTING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 18215 72nd Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032 PHONE NO. FAX NO. (425) 251 -6222 (425) 251 -8782 PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON PHONE NO. Angelo Bologna (425) 656-7447 PROPERTY OWNER/DEED T-IOLDER (Attach list if more than one) Costco Wholesale Corporation MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 999 Lake Drive, Issaquah , WA 98027 PHONE NO FAX NO. (425) 313-8100 (425) 313-8105 *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY (Please be specific) Construction of a members-only retail fueling facility at the above-referenced Costco location . The fueling facility will be located in an area that is currently used as warehouse parking on the north portion of the property. The fueling facility will consist of a 73- by 102-foot canopy with three (3) fueling islands, with nine (9) multi-product dispensers (providing 18 fueling positions).7APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE "BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS" INFORMATION SHEET. is\curpin\masters\land use applications\other land use applications.doc Costco Loc. No. 111 / BCE #6324 THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s) . SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. vow, 0 QD4-eC5 / 3 Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services 818 Stewart Street, Suite 800 Seattle, Washington 98101 Title Officer: Chantale A. Stiller-Anderson Phone: (206)448-6286 Fax: (866)678-0584 E-mail cstiller@firstam.com File No: NCS-476759-WA1 SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE NO. 3 ALTA Owners Standard Coverage Liability $ Premium $ ALTA Owners Extended Coverage Liability $ Premium $ ALTA Lenders Standard Coverage Liability $ Premium $ ALTA Lenders Extended Coverage Liability $ Premium $ ALTA Leasehold Standard Coverage Liability $ Premium $ ALTA Leasehold Extended Coverage Liability $ Premium $ Endorsements Liability $ Premium $ Govt Service Charge Cost $ Other $ We are prepared to issue Title Insurance Policy or Policies in the form and amount shown above, insuring title to the following described land: The land referred to in this report is described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. and as of 04/03/2013 at 8:00 a.m., title to the fee simple estate is vested in: Costco Wholesale Corporation, a Washington corporation Subject to the exceptions, exclusions, and stipulations which are ordinarily part of such Policy form and the following: This report is for the exclusive use of the parties herein shown and is preliminary to the issuance of a title insurance policy and shall become void unless a policy is issued,and the full premium paid. Preliminary Report Order Number: NCS-476759-WA1 Page Number: 2 1. City liens, if any, for the city of Tigard. Note: An inquiry has NOT been made concerning the actual status of such liens. A fee of $25.00 will be charged per tax account each time an inquiry request is made. 2. These premises are within the boundaries of the Tualatin Valley Water District and are subject to the levies and assessments thereof. 3. These premises are within the boundaries of the Clean Water Services District and are subject to the levies and assessments thereof. 4. Rights of the public and of governmental bodies in and to that portion of the premises herein described lying below the high water mark of Unnamed Creek . (Affects Parcels I and II) 5. Any adverse claim based upon the assertion that some portion of said land has been removed from or brought within the boundaries thereof by an avulsive movement of the Unnamed Creek or has been formed by the process of accretion or reliction or has been created by artificial means or has accreted to such portion so created. (Affects Parcel II) 6. An easement for electrical lines, telephone lines and appurtenances and incidental purposes, recorded February 27, 1953 in Book 341, Page 0598 In Favor of: Portland General Electric Company, a corporation of Oregon Affects: Parcel II 7. An easement for underground sewer line and appurtenances and incidental purposes, recorded October 11, 1968 in Book 720, Page 0515 In Favor of: City of Tigard Affects: Parcel II 8. An easement for sewer line and incidental purposes, recorded February 06, 1970 in Book 770, Page 0759 In Favor of: City of Tigard Affects: Parcel II 9. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Agreement of Conveyance, Easements and Covenants" recorded January 15, 1992 as Fee No. 92002831 Document re-recorded January 22, 1992 as Fee No. 92004083 Document(s) declaring modifications thereof recorded March 20, 1995 as Fee No. 95017634 Document(s) declaring modifications thereof recorded April 12, 1999 as Fee No. 99044504 First American Title Preliminary Report Order Number: NCS-476759-WA1 Page Number: 3 Document re-recorded August 12, 1999 as Fee No. 99094869 10. This property is within the Dartmouth Street Local Improvement District No. 40 and is subject to assessments therein, as disclosed by deed to Western-Duff Tigard Partners, a California general partnership; Recorded: September 21, 1993 Recorder's Fee No.: 93077272 (Affects Parcels II, IV, V and VI) 11. Restrictive Covenant to Waive Remonstrance, pertaining to street improvements including the terms and provisions thereof Recorded: April 28, 1994 as Fee No. 94041551 12. Reservation of utilities in vacated street area and the right to maintain the same as set forth in Ordinance No. 94-02 a copy of which was recorded October 24, 1994 as Fee No. 94096591 13. The terms, provisions and easement(s) contained in the document entitled "Easement and Access Agreement" recorded December 08, 1994 as Fee No. 94109528 14. Unrecorded leases or periodic tenancies, if any. 15. Limited access provisions contained in Deed to the State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission recorded February 18, 1966 in Book 588, Page 0567 Deed Records, which provides that no right of easement or right of access to, from or across the State Highway other than expressly therein provided for shall attach to the abutting property. (Affects Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of Parcel I) 16. Limited access provisions in favor of the State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission as contained in Decree of Condemnation entered April 21, 1966 in Suit No. 27-169 in the Circuit Court for Washington County, which provides that no right of easement or right of access to, from or across the State Highway other than expressly therein provided for shall attach to the abutting property. (Affects Parcels IV, V and VI) 17. An easement for underground sewer line and incidental purposes, recorded August 08, 1967 in Book 653, Page 0596 In Favor of: City of Tigard, a Municipal corporation Affects: Lot 8 of Parcel I 18. An easement for underground sewer line and incidental purposes, recorded August 08, 1967 in Book 653, Page 0600 In Favor of: City of Tigard, a Municipal corporation of Oregon Affects: Parcel VI First American Title Preliminary Report Order Number: NCS-476759-WA1 Page Number: 4 19. An easement for underground sewer line and incidental purposes, recorded March 31, 1969 in Book 737, Page 0807 In Favor of: City of Tigard, a Municipal corporation Affects: Lots 4 and 5 of Parcel I -END OF EXCEPTIONS- First American Title Preliminary Report Order Number: NCS-476759-WA1 Page Number: 5 INFORMATIONAL NOTES NOTE: Taxes for the year 2012-2013, paid in full. Tax Amount: $224,110.67 Code No.: 023.81 Map &Tax Lot No. 1S136CD-02200 Property ID/Key No. R284392 (Affects Lots 1 through 3 of Parcel I & Parcels II and III) NOTE: Taxes for the year 2012-2013, paid in full. Tax Amount: $24,962.07 Code No.: 023.81 Map &Tax Lot No. 2S11BA-00200 Property ID/Key No. R458089 (Affects Lots 4 through 8 of Parcel I) NOTE: Taxes for the year 2012-2013, paid in full. Tax Amount: $14,956.04 Code No.: 023.81 Map &Tax Lot No. 2S11BB-01201 Property ID/Key No. R458329 (Affects Parcels IV, V &VI) First American Title Preliminary Report Order Number: NCS-476759-WA1 Page Number: 6 THANK YOU FOR CHOOSING FIRST AMERICAN TITLE WE KNOW YOU HAVE A CHOICE! Cc: Attn: Cc: Attn: Cc: Attn: First American Title Preliminary Report Order Number: NCS-476759-WA1 Page Number: 7 R■[ NL First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE ALTA LOAN POLICY(10/17/92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage,costs,attorneys'fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a)Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances,or regulations)restricting,regulating,prohibiting or relating to(i)the occupancy,use,or enjoyment of the land;(ii)the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii)a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part;or(iv)environmental protection,or the effect of any violation of these laws,ordinances or governmental regulations,except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy; (b)Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other matters: (a)created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b)not known to the Company,not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services,labor or material or the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at date of policy);or (e)resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy,or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness,to comply with the applicable"doing business"laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage,or claim thereof,which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services,labor or materials(or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services,labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim,which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy,by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy,state insolvency,or similar creditors'rights laws,that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer;or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination;or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a)to timely record the instrument of transfer;or (b)of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. ALTA OWNER'S POLICY(10/17/92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage,costs,attorneys'fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a)Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances,or regulations)restricting,regulating,prohibiting or relating to(i)the occupancy,use,or enjoyment of the land;(ii)the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii)a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part;or(iv)environmental protection,or the effect of any violation of these laws,ordinances or governmental regulations,except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b)Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other matters: (a)created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b)not known to the Company,not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy;or (e)resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim,which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy,by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy,state insolvency,or similar creditors'rights laws,that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer;or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer;or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. SCHEDULE OF STANDARD EXCEPTIONS The ALTA standard policy form will contain in Schedule B the following standard exceptions to coverage: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records;proceeding by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments,or notice of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Facts,rights,interests,or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements or claims of easement,not shown by the public records;reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;water rights,claims or title to water. 4. Any encroachment(of existing improvements located on the subject land onto adjoining land or of existing improvements located on adjoining land onto the subject land),encumbrance,violation,variation,or adverse circumstance affecting the title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the subject land. 5. Any lien,or right to a lien,for services,labor,material,equipment rental or workers compensation heretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by law or not shown by the public records. NOTE: A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM(OR FORMS)WILL BE FURNISHED UPON REQUEST TI 149 Rev.6-06 First American Title Preliminary Report Order Number: NCS-476759-WA1 Page Number: 8 Exhibit "A" Real property in the County of Washington , State of Oregon, described as follows: PARCEL I: LOTS 1 THROUGH 8, INCLUSIVE, PALMER ACRES, (PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 0026), WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF A 20 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY THAT INURED THERETO BY ORDINANCE NO. 94-02, RECORDED OCTOBER 24, 1994, AS FEE NO. 94096591. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF LOT 8 CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OREGON BY AND THROUGH ITS STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 588, PAGE 0567, WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS CREATED PRIOR TO JANUARY 01, 2008. PARCEL II: A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS PARCEL II, IN THAT CERTAIN DEED OF TRUST TO NEW WEST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION RECORDED AS FEE NO. 89028994, DEED RECORDS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, SAID PORTION BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL II, WHICH POINT BEARS SOUTH 83°36'41" EAST 22.60 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; AND RUNNING THENCE 381.33 FEET ALONG A NONTANGENT 465.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT (THE LONG CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 03°43'22" EAST 370.74 FEET); THENCE 510.80 FEET ALONG A 535.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT (THE LONG CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 07°32'55" EAST 491.62 FEET) TO THE CENTER OF A CREEK KNOWN AS RED ROCK CREEK; THENCE FOLLOWING THE CENTER OF SAID CREEK SOUTH 10°32'11" WEST 13.89 FEET, SOUTH 62°27'30" WEST 39.83 FEET, SOUTH 19°21'41" WEST 7.92 FEET, SOUTH 87°54'42" WEST 17.36 FEET, SOUTH 05°24'38" WEST 34.15 FEET, SOUTH 51°12'52" WEST 33.47 FEET, SOUTH 40°02'17" WEST 43.15 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL II; THENCE NORTH 00°13'56" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE, 986.76 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL II; THENCE SOUTH 83°36'41" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, 22.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT THE PORTION OF PROPERTY DEDICATED TO PUBLIC FOR ROAD PURPOSE AS DISCLOSED BY THE INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 08, 1994 AS FEE NO. 94109529. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS CREATED PRIOR TO JANUARY 01, 2008. PARCEL III: LOTS 1 TO 19, TWIN OAKS LANE (PLAT BOOK 12, PAGE 18) IN THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON AND STATE OF OREGON. First American Title Preliminary Report Order Number: NCS-476759-WA1 Page Number: 9 TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF A 20 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY AND S.W. 79TH AVENUE THAT INURED THERETO BY ORDINANCE NO. 94-02, RECORDED OCTOBER 24, 1994, AS FEE NO. 94096591. THE ABOVE SUBDIVISION HAS BEEN VACATED BY THE ORDINANCE NO. 94-02, RECORDED OCTOBER 24, 1994, AS FEE NO. 94096591. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS CREATED PRIOR TO JANUARY 01, 2008. PARCEL IV: THAT PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND IN SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE BEAVERTON TIGARD HIGHWAY AS DESCRIBED IN CASE NO. 27- 169, CIRCUIT COURT FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY. BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE GEORGE RICHARDSON DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 38, SAID BEGINNING POINT BEING REACHED BY RUNNING FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE W.W. GRAHAM DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 39, SOUTH 83° EAST 4.69 CHAINS AND NORTH 20°10' WEST 4.52 CHAINS TO A STONE, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 79°25' EAST 4.45 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 77°28' EAST 3.30 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 44° EAST 2.50 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 12°30' EAST 1.70 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 37°10' WEST 1.69 CHAINS; THENCE SOUTH 86°13' WEST 49 LINKS; THENCE NORTH 00°29' WEST 15.00 CHAINS ALONG THE WEST LINE OF TWIN OAKS LAND, A PLAT OF RECORD OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, AND ITS SOUTHERLY AND NORTHERLY EXTENSIONS, TO THE CENTER OF TAYLOR'S BRIDGE ROAD; THENCE WEST 30 LINKS; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE AND ITS SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THAT TRACT CONVEYED TO RALPH L. PALMER, ET UX, BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 251, PAGE 0759, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS, SOUTH 00°29' EAST 15.00 CHAINS; THENCE SOUTH 86°13' WEST 1.84 CHAINS; THENCE SOUTH 59°10' WEST 4.50 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 84°33' WEST 3.11 CHAINS; THENCE SOUTH 20°10' EAST 2.72 CHAINS TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS CREATED PRIOR TO JANUARY 01, 2008. PARCEL V: THAT PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND IN THE GEORGE RICHARDSON DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 38 AND 55 IN SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST AND IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE BEAVERTON-TIGARD HIGHWAY AS DESCRIBED IN CASE NO. 27-169, CIRCUIT COURT FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY. COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID RICHARDSON DONATION LAND CLAIM, SOUTH 83° EAST 4.69 CHAINS FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE W.W. GRAHAM DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 39; AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 20°43' WEST 4.52 CHAINS TO A STONE; THENCE SOUTH 79°25' EAST 4.45 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 77°28' EAST 3.30 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 44°00' EAST 2.50 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 12°30' EAST 1.70 CHAINS; First American Title Preliminary Report Order Number: NCS-476759-WA1 Page Number: 10 THENCE NORTH 37°10' WEST 1.69 CHAINS TO BEGINNING POINT OF THE LAND TO BE DESCRIBED; RUNNING THENCE FROM SAID BEGINNING POINT SOUTH 86°13' WEST 32.34 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF PRIVATE ROADWAY 30 LINKS WIDE; THENCE NORTH 0°03' WEST FOLLOWING THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID ROADWAY 336.03 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE; THENCE EAST 321.86 FEET TO AN IRON PIPE ON THE WEST LINE OF PALMER ACRES, A RECORDED PLAT IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON; THENCE SOUTH 1°44'40" EAST FOLLOWING THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PLAT OF PALMER ACRES, 333.65 FEET; THENCE WEST 299.00 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS CREATED PRIOR TO JANUARY 01, 2008. PARCEL VI: THAT PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE BEAVERTON-TIGARD HIGHWAY AS DESCRIBED IN CASE NO. 27-169, CIRCUIT COURT FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY: A TRACT OF LAND IN THE GEORGE RICHARDSON DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 38; BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF THE RICHARDSON DONATION LAND CLAIM 4.69 CHAINS SOUTH 83° EAST FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE DONATION LAND CLAIM OF THE W.W. GRAHAM DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 39; AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 20°43' WEST 4.52 CHAINS; THENCE SOUTH 79°25' EAST 4.45 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 77°28' EAST 3.30 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 44° EAST 2.50 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 12°30' EAST 1.70 CHAINS; THENCE NORTH 37°10' WEST 1.69 CHAINS; THENCE EAST 4.50 CHAINS, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WEST LINE OF PALMER ACRES, A RECORDED PLAT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE SOUTH 1°15' EAST 10.365 CHAINS TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID RICHARDSON DONATION LAND CLAIM; THENCE NORTH 83°00' WEST 11.95 CHAINS TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS CREATED PRIOR TO JANUARY 01, 2008. First American Title • NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING COSTCO GASOLINE PROJECT TIGARD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 12345 SW MAIN STREET,TIGARD, OR 7:30 P.M. APRIL 11, 2013 PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION • AGNES KOWACZ ASSOCIATE PLANNER CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD. OR 97233 PHONE: (503)7182427 JOHN ELLINGSEN SENIOR PLANNER BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 PHONE: (425)251-6222 6324.002.doc 94:4 .� CIVIL ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING,SURVEYING �� 9 sG 9 4 may, 441G ENoNf March 27,2013 RE: Neighborhood Meeting Costco Wholesale Fueling Facility 7850 S.W. Dartmouth Street, Tigard, Oregon 97223 Costco Loc. No. 111 /Our Job No. 6324 Costco Wholesale Corporation is proposing the construction of a members-only retail fueling facility at the above-referenced Costco location. The fueling facility will be located in an area that is currently used as warehouse parking on the north portion of the property. The fueling facility will consist of a 73-by 102-foot canopy with 3 fueling islands, with 9 multi-product dispensers (providing 18 fueling positions). This site is zoned General Commercial. Prior to preparing the engineering design plans and making a formal application to the City of Tigard for the necessary review and approvals,we would like to provide an opportunity for the surrounding property owners and residents to hear a brief presentation about the project and to discuss project details with our team. Therefore,you are cordially invited to attend an informational meeting scheduled for: DATE: April 11,2013 LOCATION: Tigard Chamber of Commerce 12345 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 TIME: 7:30 pm to 9:30 pm Please note that we will be discussing preliminary project plans and these may be altered prior to the submittal of a formal application to the City of Tigard. We look forward to discussing the project with you. •ectfu P EP 4 Jo n Elling enior Planner JE/kb 6324c.014.doc enc: Location Map Conceptual Site Plan Neighborhood Meeting Information cc: David H Rogers,Costco Wholesale Corporation 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT,WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX BRANCH OFFICES 0 OLYMPIA,WA 0 CONCORD,CA 0 TEMECULA,CA www.barghausen.com NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Cosrco GASOLINE PROJECT TIGARD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 12345 SW MAIN STREET,TIGARD,OR 7:30 P.M. APRIL 11,2013 ATTENDANCE NAME ADDRESS ►y,..c i 1335 5 w Ge. kV/ 19o/ P771, 9 7u..2 6324 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES COSTCO GASOLINE PROJECT TIGARD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 12345 SW MAIN STREET, TIGARD, OR 7:30 P.M. APRIL 11, 2013 The meeting promptly began at 7:30 p.m. Presenters: John Ellingsen, Barghausen Engineers Sonia Hennum, Kittelson & Associates David Rogers, Costco Wholesale The meeting's agenda: fr Read Statement of Purpose Describe project Attendee: Dave Kimmel Items Discussed: Potential tanker conflict with main driveway traffic Comments from Attendee: He does not shop at Tigard Costco The meeting ended at 9:20 p.m. 6324.005.doc BCE#6324 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING/POSTING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A COPY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE,TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Divisions 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223-8189 IN ADDITION,THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT&COPIES OP ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: I, John Ellingsen ,being duly sworn,depose and say that on the 28th day of March 20 13 ,I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list,a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 7850 SW Dartmouth Street,Tigard,OR ,a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 18215 72nd Avenue South, Kent,WA 98032 with postage prepaid thereon. r Si y.azure (In the p f a Notary Public) POSTING: I, John Ellinasen ,do affirm that I am(represent)the party initiating interest in a proposed land use application for Costco Gasoline affecting the land Iocated at (state the approximate location(s)IF no address(s)and all tax lot(s)currently registered) 7850 SW Dartmouth Street.Tic)ard. OR _ ,and did on the 27th day of March ,20 13 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a new fuelina facility land use application,and the time,date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at 7580 SW Dartmouth Street,Tigard, OR,main drive isle entrance off of Dartmouth Street. (State the location you posted notice on property) s Si nature n the presenc�'a otary Public) (THIS SECTION FORA STATE OF OREGON,NOTAR LM TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF lilks(A. �3 f v,t ) County of 1 )ss. cite Subscribed and sworn/ ya � ilforkJtogSu thet day of .�tA.vt� ,20 13 \1�1t, \` \5510N o Ft % 1.z. v': ; NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON N P(IBL\G .'O My Commission Expites: O, .11v i\nir&\magas\ndghborhood mee`m+_-.s3dti a ig1471}g1rhood mectii g-doc [Type text) �— OF WAS�� �'t Narrative Proposal Description and Zoning Analysis Costco Gasoline 7850 SW Dartmouth Street Tigard, Oregon Costco Loc. No. 111 Prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. ¢coHAtt 460 'k RtiGit41•4 18215 — 72nd Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Our Job No.6324 Date: November 19, 2013 Updated: January 22, 2014 Table of Contents Page 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 2.0 CHAPTER 18.330- CONDITIONAL USE 1 3.0 CHAPTER 18.360- SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 21 4.0 CHAPTER 18.370- VARIANCES AND ADJUSTMENTS 27 (i) 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project includes the construction of a members-only, retail fueling facility within the existing Costco shopping center development, located at: 7850 SW Dartmouth Street, within the City of Tigard. The fueling facility will be located in an area that is currently used as Costco warehouse parking in the northeast portion of the property. The fueling facility consists of a 73- foot by 102-foot canopy with three (3) fueling islands, with a total of nine (9) multi-product dispensers (MPDs) providing eighteen (18) fueling positions. The project also includes the installation of three (3) 30,000-gallon underground gasoline storage tanks, one (1) 1,500-gallon underground fuel additive tank, a clean air separator, and a 6-foot by 12-foot controller enclosure. The purpose of the controller enclosure is to house the electronic monitoring equipment and alarm systems for the product piping, dispensing, and storage systems. It is not an employee workstation, nor will there be monetary transactions being made from the enclosure. Signs will be mounted on the canopy for business identification. Gasoline prices will not be advertised at the facility, except as provided on the individual dispensers. Directional signs will also be installed at the facility's entrance and exit to facilitate the one-way directional flow of traffic. 2.0 CHAPTER 18.330—CONDITIONAL USE Pursuant to Chapter 18.330.030.A of the City of Tigard Development Code, the new Costco Gasoline fueling facility conforms to the following list of standards and conditions of approval: 1. The site size and dimension provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; Response: The site size and dimension provide adequate area for the needs of the new Costco fueling facility. The total site area is 27.29 acres (1,188,962.99 S.F.), which consists of three (1) lots (parcel numbers: 1S136CD0220 — 12.69 acres; 2S101BA00200 — 10.22 acres; and 2S101 BB01201 —4.17 acres). The developed area consist of 14.86 acres (parcel: 1S136CD0220 — 12.69 acres and 2.17 acres of parcel 25101 BA00200) with an existing 145,824-square-foot Costco Wholesale warehouse, an existing parking lot with 730 parking stalls, and 12.43 acres of undeveloped wetlands area. The new fueling facility will be located within the existing developed 14.86 acres northeast section of the parking lot consisting of a 7,344- square foot canopy with eighteen (18) vehicle fueling positions. With the addition of the fueling facility total building lot coverage shall be thirteen (13) percent where a maximum of eighty-five (85) percent lot coverage is allowed. 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; Response: The existing Costco Wholesale site can accommodate the new fueling facility. • Size: The site is 27.29 acres (1,188,962.99 S.F.)with the existing Costco Wholesale warehouse occupying thirteen (13) percent of the overall site area. The new fueling facility canopy will occupy less than one (1) percent of the total site area. • Shape: The site's shape will not impact the fueling facility development. The project will accommodate the required landscape area as well as circulation needs of the facility. 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -1- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR • Location: The fueling facility will be located at the northeast corner of the property on the periphery of the site to separate the existing on-site traffic circulation of the existing Costco Wholesale warehouse from the fueling facility. The peripheral location of the gas station will maintain a contiguous primary parking field without isolating any parking spaces from the main entrance of the warehouse. • Topography: The site is relatively flat with grades of approximately 3.5 percent in the existing condition. The proposed site grading for the subject property will include grades of approximately 1 to 4 percent. As a part of the fueling facility storm drainage design, the under canopy area will be isolated from the rest of the project site through the use of grade breaks. The under canopy area will be discharged to the sanitary sewer system. • Natural Features: There are no natural features located within the location of the proposed fueling facility. The proposed location is an existing parking lot. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; Response: The site and surrounding vicinity are currently improved with all necessary facilities and services required for the project. There are no identified sanitary sewer or downstream stormwater capacity issues. The under canopy area will be hydraulically isolated from the rest of the site and routed through an oil/water separator prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer system. This limited amount of runoff is not anticipated to impact the public sanitary sewer. The project will not increase the stormwater runoff resulting in no impact to the capacity of the downstream system. However, the project will improve fifty (50) percent of the overall site to current water quality standards with the use of StormFilter catch basins. Related to streets and transportation, a formal Transportation Impact Study has been completed based on a scope agreed upon with the City of Tigard and the Oregon Department of Transportation. The study found that all study roadways and intersections will operate within applicable City and ODOT standards with the proposed development in place. In addition, the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan identifies several future improvements within the Tigard Triangle area. The transportation impact fees that will be paid by the development will be contributions to the funding and completion of these improvements. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter; Response: The site is zoned General Commercial (C-G)with a Planned Development (P-D) overlay district. Vehicle fuel sales are an allowed use with a Conditional Use Permit. The following is a list of applicable zoning district requirements: General Commercial (C-G)Zoning Standards Development Standard Required Proposed Front Yard Setback Min: 10 feet, Max: 40 feet 58'-8" Side Yard Setback 0 North: 89'-7" South: (E) 1,736' Corner Yard Setback 40 feet facing a street N/A Rear Yard Setback 0 (E) 343'-7" Building Height Max 45 feet 17'-6" Lot Width 50 feet (E)2,033' Minimum Lot Size 10,000 S.F. 1,188,962.99 S.F. 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -2- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR Maximum Site Coverage 85% 13% Minimum Landscaping 15% 56.4% Based upon our review of the zoning requirements shown in the table above, the fueling facility meets the requirements described in Chapter 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts except the maximum front yard setback. A development adjustment is requested. Pursuant to the Design Evaluation Team (DET) hearing on October 21, 2013 to review the adjustment request, DET has recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. Minimize the proposed setback by moving the entire structure toward Dartmouth Street a minimum of six(6) to eight(8) feet or more if possible. Response: The fueling facility has been moved five (5)feet toward Dartmouth Street. We have reviewed moving the fueling facility six (6) feet; however, vehicles exiting from the northern fueling positions would not have the required turning radius to exit the fueling facility. 2. The landscaping and screening along Dartmouth Street where the gas station will be located shall be increased to mitigate glare resulting from vehicle headlights, screen the parking spaces along the frontage and provide a more inviting pedestrian environment. Response: Additional shrubs have been added to the proposed landscaping plans to mitigate the glare resulting from vehicle headlights and screen the parking spaces along the frontage parking and provide a more inviting pedestrian environment. 18.390.040.6.2.E— Impact Study Transportation: A formal Transportation Impact Study has been completed (Kittelson & Associates, Inc., Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition — Transportation Impact Study, dated August 5, 2013). Based on the results, the fueling facility can be developed while maintaining acceptable operations on the surrounding transportation system. The study found that all studied roadways and intersections will operate within applicable City and ODOT standards. In addition, the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan identifies several future improvements within the Tigard Triangle area. The transportation impact fees that will be paid by the development will be contributions to the funding and completion of these improvements. Bikeways: There is an existing bikeway path located on Dartmouth Street with marked lanes suitable for bicycle travel. There are no impacts to the bikeway path system anticipated. Park System: No impact to the park system is anticipated, as the fueling facility shall be developed within the existing Costco Wholesale parking lot. Water System: No impact to the City's water system is anticipated with the addition of the fueling facility. The fueling facility will not have a restroom or sales area; therefore, no water shall be required at the fueling facility. 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -3- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR Sewer/Stormwater System: There are no identified sanitary sewers or downstream stormwater capacity issues. The under- canopy area will be hydraulically isolated from the rest of the site and routed through an oil/water separator prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer system. This limited amount of runoff is not anticipated to impact the public sanitary sewer. The fueling facility development will not increase the stormwater runoff, resulting in no impact to the capacity of the downstream system. However, the project will improve fifty (50) percent of the overall site to current water quality standards with the use of Storm Filter catch basins. Noise Impact: Noise impact to the surrounding area is not anticipated. Loudspeakers will not be used. The adjacent uses are zoned C-G commercial; the fueling facility is characteristic of the surrounding uses. Fire Protection: The fueling facility shall comply with the City of Tigard and State of Oregon fire code. The fueling facility is equipped with fire extinguishers, emergency shut offs, and a direct telephone to emergency dispatch via a "911 telephone" accessible to the customers which is mounted on the exterior of the control enclosure. CHAPTER 18.620—TIGARD TRIANGLE DESIGN STANDARDS 18.620.020 Street Connectivity A. Demonstration of Standards. All development must demonstrate how one of the following standard options will be met. Variance of these standards may be approved per the requirements of Section 18.370.010 where topography, barriers such as railroads or freeways, or environmental constraints such as major streams and rivers prevent street extensions and connections. 1. Design Option. a. Local street spacing shall provide public street connections at intervals of no more than 660 feet. Response: The existing drive isles into the Costco Wholesale property are spaced approximately 762 feet apart. No changes are proposed. b. Bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way shall be provided at intervals of no more than 330 feet. Response: No change to the existing bike and pedestrian connections on public easements or right-of-way is proposed. 2. Performance Option. a. Local street spacing shall occur at intervals of no less than eight street intersections per mile Response: Not applicable. No local streets are proposed. 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -4- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR b. The shortest vehicle trip over public streets from a local origin to collector or greater facility is no more than twice the straight line distance. Response: Not applicable. No changes to the existing street connectivity are proposed. c. The shortest pedestrian trip on public right-of-way from local origin to a collector or greater facility is no more than 1-1/2 the straight-line distance. Response: Not applicable. No changes are proposed. 18.620.030 Site Design Standards A. Compliance. All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one acre or larger a phase development plan must be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be me. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010.C.2, governing criteria for granting a variance, is satisfied. 1. Building placement on major and minor arterials. Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50% of all street frontages along major and minor arterial streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on major arterial streets. See Diagram 1 for examples of how this standard may be met. Response: An adjustment to the placement of the fueling facility to occupy a minimum of 50% of the street frontage along Southwest Dartmouth is being requested with this application. The fueling facility canopy will be set back 58- feet, 8- inches from the property line. The increase in setback is needed to allow for the required turning radius of emergency vehicles, fuel deliver trucks, and the vehicles exiting the fueling facility. 2. Building Setback. The minimum building setback from public street rights-of-way or dedicated wetlands/buffers and other environmental features shall be zero feet; the maximum building setback shall be 10 feet. Response: As noted above, the proposed fueling facility is set back 58 feet, 8 inches from the public rights-of-way. An adjustment to the Tigard Triangle setback requirement is being requested to allow for the required vehicle circulation. 3. Front yard setback design. Landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path must be provided between a structure and a public street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one street, the required improvements shall be provided on all streets. Landscaping shall be developed to the applicable standard in paragraph 5 of this subsection A. Hard-surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Benches and other street furnishing are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.520.040B and Table 18.520.2. Response: The fueling facility is an accessory use to the existing Costco Warehouse. The existing landscaping within the pedestrian paths shall remain. No changes are proposed. 4. Walkway connection to building entrances. A walkway connection is required between a building's entrance and a public street or accessway. This walkway must be at least 6 feet wide and be paved with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Building entrances at a corner near a public street intersection are encouraged. These areas 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -5- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per Section 18.520.040B and Table 18520.2. Response: There are existing walkway connections from the public street to the building entrance; no additional walkway connections are required. 5. Parking location and landscape design. Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on the side, parking is limited to 50% of the street frontage. When abutting public streets, parking must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 parking lot screen standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 landscaped area is eight feet or is equal to the adjacent building setback, whichever is greater. All other site landscaping shall be landscaped to an L-2 general landscaping standard. The L-1 and L-2 standards are more fully described in Section 18.620.070. Response: No new parking is proposed. The existing parking adjacent to the public street rights-of-way is developed based on the L-1 and L-2 standards. 6. Parking location and landscape design. Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. If located on the side, parking is limited to 50% of the street frontage and must be behind a landscape area construct to an L-1 landscape standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 landscape area is eight feet or is equal to the building setback, whichever is greater. Interior side and rear yards shall be landscaped to an L-2 standard, except where a side yard abuts a public street where it shall be landscaped to an L-1 landscaped standard. See Diagram 2 below. Response: No additional parking is proposed. The existing parking lot is developed to meet the L-1 and L-2 standards. 18.620.040 Building Design Standards A. Nonresidential buildings. All non-residential buildings shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010 C2, criteria for granting variance is satisfied. 1. Ground floor windows. All street-facing elevations within the Building Setback(0 to 10 feet) along public streets shall include a minimum of 50% of the ground floor wall area with windows, display areas or doorway openings. The ground floor wall area shall be measured from three feet above grade to nine feet above grade the entire width of the street-facing elevation. The ground floor window requirement shall be met within the ground floor wall area and for glass doorway openings to ground level. Up to 50% of the ground floor window requirement may be met on an adjoining elevation as long as all of the requirement is located at a building corner. Response: Does not apply. The proposed fuel canopy will not contain windows or doors. The fuel canopy will provide weather protection for customers fueling their vehicles. 2. Building facades. Facades that face a public street shall extend no more than 50 feet without providing at least one of the following features: (a) a variation in building materials; (b) a building off-set of at least 1 foot; (c) a wall area that is entirely separated from other wall areas by a projection, such as an arcade; or (d) by another design features that reflect the building's structural system. No building façade shall extend for more than 300 feet without a pedestrian connection between or through the building. 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -6- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR Response: The canopy is a post and truss system; providing an off-set of at least one (1) foot will not provide any structural function. The fuel canopy is supported by a vertical structural column that provides articulation and variation. The canopy will complement the existing warehouse in similar colors and materials. 3. Weather protection. Weather protection for pedestrians, such as awnings, canopies, and arcades, shall be provided at building entrances. Weather protection is encouraged along building frontages abutting a public sidewalk or a hard-surfaced expansion of a sidewalk, and along building frontages between a building entrance and a public street or accessway. Awnings and canopies shall not be back lit. Response: A fuel canopy will be constructed to protect customers from the weather. 4. Building materials. Plain concrete block, plain concrete, corrugated metal, plywood, sheet press board or vinyl siding may not be used as exterior finish materials. Foundation material may be plain concrete block where the foundation material is not revealed for more than 2 feet. Response: The new fueling facility will be designed and constructed with similar colors and materials of the existing Costco Wholesale warehouse. 5. Roofs and roof lines. Except in the case of a building entrance feature, roofs shall be designed as an extension of the primary materials used for the building and should respect the building's structural system and architectural style. False fronts and false roofs are not permitted. Response: The flat roof design of the fuel canopy will complement the existing Costco warehouse and surrounding area. 6. Roof-mounted equipment. All roof-mounted equipment must be screened from view from adjacent public streets. Satellite dishes and other communication equipment must be set back or positioned on a roof so the exposure from adjacent public streets is minimized. Solar heating panels are exempt from standards. Response: No roof-mounted equipment will be installed. 18.620.070 Landscaping and Screening Applicable levels. Two levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable to the Tigard Triangle. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other sub-sections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitation are met. A. L-1 parking lot screen. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on public streets. The L-1 standard is in addition to other standards in other chapters of this title. The setback shall be a minimum of eight feet between the parking lot and public street. L-1 trees shall be considered parking lot trees and spaced between 30 and 40 feet on center within the setback. All L-1 trees shall be a minimum of 3% inch caliper at the time of planting. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a three-foot high screen and a 90% opacity within one year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two years. Response: The narrowest dimension of the frontage landscape along Dartmouth is approximately 6'-6". Deciduous trees are two (2)-inch caliper and evergreen trees are 6'-7' height at an average of 15'-6" on center. The shrubs are aligned in a formal row along the 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -7- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR frontage of the property to provide additional screening from the vehicle headlight glare and frontage parking. Shrubs are a minimum of 3' height for ninety (90) percent opacity within one (1)year. Groundcover is spaced for full coverage within two (2)years. B. L-2 general landscaping. The L-2 standard applies to all other trees and shrubs required by this chapter and Chapter 18.745 (except those required for L-1 parking lot screen). For trees and shrubs required by Chapter 18.745, the L-2 standard is an additional standard. L-2 trees that are also street trees, median trees, and trees required to frame entry portals shall be selected in conformance with Table 18.620.1 of this section. If conformance with Table 18.620.1 is precluded by physical constraints caused by public utilities or required public improvements, the director may approve alternative selections. All L-2 trees shall be a minimum of 2%-inch caliper at the time of planting. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two years. Response: Parking lot islands are planted with deciduous canopy trees 2 '/2" caliper at 17' to 26' on center. Shrubs and groundcover are of a size and quality to achieve screening within two (2)years. 18.620.090 Design Evaluation A Design Evaluation adjustment is requested for the minimum setback of zero (0) feet with a maximum of ten (10) feet where approximately seventy (70) feet is proposed. An adjustment is also requested for the building façade variation. 1. Granting the adjustment will continue to meet the purpose of the standard(s) to be modified in an acceptable alternative manner;and Response: Granting of the adjustment requested above will continue to meet the purpose of the Tigard Triangle Design Standards, which include creating a high-quality mixed-use employment area by including the retail fueling facility with the existing Costco Wholesale warehouse; providing a convenient pedestrian and bikeway path system by maintaining paved paths from Southwest Dartmouth to the Costco site; and utilizing streetscape to create a high quality image for the area by improving the vegetative buffer between the street and parking field. 2. The proposal will not significantly detract from the livability or appearance of an area and the proposal will be consistent with the desired character of the area;and Response: The fueling facility will not detract from the livability or appearance of the area. As a member-only fueling facility, the facility is able to provide a valuable service to the community without the visible impacts of a typical corner fueling facility development. The fueling facility will provide minimal signage with appropriate lighting to promote safety. The fueling facility will be consistent with the character of the area. The surrounding area consists of retail shops, restaurants, office, and a retail fueling facility with service bays. 3. If more than one adjustment is being requested, the cumulative effect of the adjustment as well each individual adjustment results in a project which is still consistent with the overall purpose, goals and standards of the zone;and Response: The requested adjustment for the front yard setback requirements is consistent with the overall purpose, goals, and standards for the C-G Zone of providing a wide range of uses which include warehouses and retail fueling facilities. The C-G Zone requires fueling facilities to be setback forty (40)feet. 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -8- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR 4. Granting the adjustment is the minimum necessary to allow the proposed use of the site, and any impacts from the adjustment are mitigated to the extent practical. Response: Granting the adjustment for the front yard setback requirement is the minimum necessary to allow for the use of the fueling facility. Should the fueling facility be placed within the required setback, the fueling facility would not be able to provide the required turning radius for vehicles to exit the fueling facility. CHAPTER 18.705—ACCESS, EGRESS, AND CIRCULATION Existing access and egress will be maintained. Circulation pattern for the proposed Costco Gasoline fueling facility will route customers utilizing "one-way" directional signs where members will be entering and exiting the fueling facility in a one-way direction. Please see the attached Transportation Impact Study for a complete description of circulation. 18.705.030 General Provisions C. Joint Access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both use, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title provided: 1. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented in the form of deeds, easements, leases or contracts to establish the joint uses;and Response: The fueling facility is an accessory use to the warehouse similar to the bakery, tire center, and food court. Joint access and egress for the fueling facility should not be required. 2. Copies of the deeds, easements, leases or contracts are placed on permanent file with the City. Response: As noted above, the fueling facility is an accessory use to the Costco Wholesale warehouse and is owned and operated by Costco Corporation; no access agreement should be required. D. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Section 18.705.030.H and 18.705.030.1 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on continuous basis. Response: Vehicular access and egress for the fueling facility is connected to the two (2) existing Costco Wholesale warehouse egress accesses from Southwest Dartmouth Street. The access and egress will be maintained at the required standards. F. Required walkway location. On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: 1. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps. Or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -9- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR Response: There are two (2) walkways, five (5) feet in width, which extend from the Costco Wholesale warehouse to the new fueling facility and connect to the street. There is a pedestrian walkway located adjacent the northern Southwest Dartmouth Avenue drive isle that connects the existing warehouse and fueling facility to Southwest Dartmouth Street. The second walkway connects Pacific Highway to the existing Costco Wholesale warehouse and new fueling facility. 2. Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; Response: Not applicable. No dwellings are proposed. 3. Whenever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six- inch vertical separation (cubed) or a minimum three-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossing of traffic aisles are permitted for distance no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. Response: All walkways that cross vehicle access driveways and the parking lot are separated by a six (6)-inch curb. The pavement is markings are used when crossing traffic aisles. 4. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, other pervious paving surfaces, etc. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. Response: The existing walkways are five (5)feet in width and paved with concrete and are lighted with overhead lighting which meets ADA requirements. H. Access management. 1. An access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and AASHTO (depending on jurisdiction of facility.) Response: Not applicable. No new driveways or streets are proposed. 2. Driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -10- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR shared access with adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. Response: Not applicable. No new driveways are proposed. 3. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. Response: Not applicable, no driveways and streets are proposed. The existing driveway to the north is approximately 30 feet in width and is located approximately 617 feet from the southern driveway which is approximately 40 feet in width. 4. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. Response: Not applicable. No local streets are proposed. J. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use. 1. Vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.3; Response: The vehicle access, egress, and circulation for the fueling facility will meet the minimum access requirements. The entrance of the fueling facility will provide a 50-foot-wide drive aisle entrance into the fueling facility. A 33-foot 9-inch access width is provided for vehicles exiting the fuel pump canopy, and 48 feet is provided for vehicle exiting the fueling facility. 2. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; Response: Not applicable to the fueling facility. 3. Additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. Response: Acknowledged. CHAPTER 18.725— ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 18.725.030 Performance Standards A. Noise. For the purpose of noise regulation, the provision of Section 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Response: There are no potential impacts to uses within the surrounding area. The adjacent uses are zoned C-G commercial; the new fueling facility is characteristic of the surrounding uses. B. Visible emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-07) apply. Response: No emission which results in a stack source or point source will be produced 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -11- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR from the fueling facility. C. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircrafts is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Response: No vibrations will be produced from the fueling facility. D. Odors. The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Response: No emission of odorous gases beyond the property line will be emitted. E. Glare and heat. No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and 1. There shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot of the source;and 2. These regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking area or construction equipment at the time construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Response: No glare and heat will occur from the new fueling facility. The fueling facility will use LED lighting for under canopy lighting. F. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which not to attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. Response: Costco Wholesale will continue to provide adequate means for required periodic maintenance at the site. 18.745.040A Street Tree Standards Street trees shall be required as part of the approval process for conditional use (Type Ill), downtown design review (Type 11 and Ill), minor land partition (Type II), planned development (Type III), site development review(Type II), and subdivision (Type II and III)permits. Response: Fifteen (15) street trees were installed as part of the overall Costco Wholesale warehouse development. The existing street trees are planted one (1) tree per forty (40) linear feet. No additional street trees should be required. 18.745.050E Screening: Special Provisions 1. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas: a. Screening of parking and loading areas is required. In no case shall nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas (i.e., nonconforming situation) be permitted to become any less conforming. Nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas shall be brought into conformance with the provisions of this chapter as part of the approval process for conditional use (Type Ill), downtown design review (Type ll and Ill), planned development(Type Ill), and site development review(Type II) permits only. The specifications for this screening are as follows: 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -12- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR i. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; Response: The existing parking area is screened from views of the public rights-of- way with a minimum eight (8)-foot-wide landscaped area that is designed with a berm for the locations where the site is level with the public rights-of-way and is sloped upward as Southwest Dartmouth slopes downwards. Additional shrubs will be planted within the existing landscape strip to screen the fueling facility from Southwest Dartmouth Street. ii. Landscaped planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-street parking areas from the public right-of-way; Response: The existing parking lot has been landscaped to screen the parking lot area from view of the public rights-of-way. The parking lot is elevated above the public rights-of-way and is landscaped with shrubs and trees. Additional trees and shrubs are proposed to provide additional screening and glare from the vehicle headlights facing Southwest Dartmouth Street. iii. Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; Response: A mixture of trees, shrubs, and ground cover has been installed to achieve a visual interest and screening. Additional trees and shrubs and ground cover shall be installed to provide additional screening of the fuel facility. iv. All parking areas, including parking spaces and aisles, shall be required to achieve at least 30% tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the parking area in accordance with the parking lot tree canopy standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. Response: The parking area shall have a tree canopy cover at maturity above the parking area of approximately 42.42 percent. 2. Screening of service facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse material shall be contained within the screened area. Response: No service facilities such as refuse containers or disposals are proposed. The electrical transformer and clean air separator will be screened from the public view with landscaping. 4. Screen of refuse containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. Response: No refuse containers for the fueling facility are proposed. The fueling facility shall use the existing Costco Wholesale warehouse refuse containers which are screened with a masonry wall. 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -13- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR CHAPTER 18.765—OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS The new fueling facility will be located within the northeastern portion of the existing Costco Warehouse parking lot. Per Section 18.765.2 "Parking Ratio Requirements for Retail Sales," the required parking spaces are 3.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet with a maximum of 5.1 spaces per 1,000 square feet of retail space with an additional three (3) parking spaces required for the fueling facility; therefore, a minimum of 438 and maximum of 744 parking spaces are required. The existing site contains 730 parking spaces; 83 spaces will be removed; therefore, 647 parking spaces will be provided. 18.765.0303 Location of Vehicle Parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s). Response: Not applicable. No dwellings are proposed. 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 500 feet from the property line that they are required to serve, measured along the most direct, publicly accessible pedestrian route from the property line with the following exceptions: a. Commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parking space may provide for the space in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 500 feet from the primary site; Response: All off-street parking is located on the primary site with all parking spaces located within 500 feet of the property line. b. The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces, Response: All disabled-accessible spaces are located on the primary site adjacent to the Costco Wholesale warehouse entrance. Disabled-accessible spaces are not required for the fueling facility. 2) Short-term spaces, Response: Not applicable. Short-term parking spaces are not required for the fueling facility. 3) Long term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces, Response: Based upon 340 employees, at total of 17 carpool/vanpool spaces have been designated to the southern portion of the parking lot. 4) Long-term spaces, Response: Not applicable. Long-term parking spaces are not required for the fueling facility. 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -14- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR 18.765.030.0 Joint parking. Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the following: 1. The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; Response: Joint parking is not applicable to the fueling facility. The number of parking spaces required by Section 18.765.070 for the Costco Wholesale site is 437, and the fueling facility shall require three (3) parking spaces. A total of 646 are proposed. Based upon the information provided, an additional 206 parking spaces are provided beyond the code requirement. 2. Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; Response: The proposed fueling facility is an accessory use to the Costco Wholesale warehouse similar to the tire center or bakery. The fueling facility will be owned and operated by Costco Wholesale Corporation. 3. If a joint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the use change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately Response: As noted above, a joint arrangement should not be required for the fueling facility; the use is an accessory use to the operations of the Costco Wholesale warehouse. 18.765.030.E Preferential lona-term carpool/vanpool parking. Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, students and other regular visitor to the site. At least five percent of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in Section 18.765.040.N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday. Response: Not applicable. Carpool/vanpool is not required for this use. 18.765.030.G Disabled-accessible parking. All areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. Response: Pursuant to the State Building Code and federal standards, a total of 13 disabled- accessible parking spaces are required, and a total of 21 existing disable accessible parking spaces are provided. All parking spaces are sized, signed, and marked as required by state and federal standards. 18.765.040.J Wheel stops. Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the font of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -15- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR Response: A six (6)-inch curb is provided for parking spaces along the boundaries of the parking lot, adjacent to interior landscaped areas and sidewalks, and the landscaping shall be maintained with low lying landscaping. Four (4) inch wheel stops have been added to interior parking spaces where the landscaping is adjacent to the parking stall. 18.765.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards Minimum bicycle parking requirements. The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Single-family residences and duplexes are excluded from the bicycle parking requirements. The Director may reduce the number of required bicycle parking spaces by means of an adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020.C.5.e. Response: Two (2) additional bicycle parking spaces will be provided for the fueling facility, located at the front entrance of the Costco Wholesale warehouse under the entrance canopy. A. Location and access. With regard to the location and access to bicycle parking: 1. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; Response: The two (2) additional bicycle parking areas for the fueling facility will be located within twenty (20) feet the Costco Wholesale warehouse entrance, under the entrance canopy. 2. Bicycle parking area shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways. Response: As noted above, the bicycle parking will be located under the Costco Wholesale warehouse entrance canopy, adjacent to the main warehouse entrance. 3. Outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible form the street, directional signs shall be used to locate the parking area. Response: The bicycle parking is located adjacent to the Costco Wholesale warehouse main entrance visible from the existing parking area. 4. Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirements for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Response: As noted above, the bicycle parking area is located on the main floor, outside, with the main warehouse entrance canopy. B. Covered parking spaces. 1. When possible, bicycle parking facility should be provided under cover Response: The bicycle parking is located under cover, located within the Costco Wholesale warehouse main entrance canopy. 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -16- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR 2. Required bicycle parking for uses served by a parking structure must provide for covered bicycle parking unless the structure will be more than 100 feet from the primary entrance to the building, in which case, the uncovered bicycle parking may be provided closer to the building entrance. Response: Not applicable; not served by a parking structure. C. Design requirements. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: 1. The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provisions of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee)parking is encourage but not required. Response: The bicycle parking spaces will be a "3-Loop Wave" style bicycle rack that will allow for bicycles to be securely locked without undue inconvenience. 2. Bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure. Response: The bicycle racks will be securely anchored to the ground with bolts. 3. Bicycle parking spaces shall be at least two and one-half by six feet long, and, when covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking. Response: The proposed bicycle parking spaces shall provide a two and one-half(2 1/2) by six (6)feet space for each bicycle. 4. Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle. Response: Each bicycle parking space will be accessible without moving another bicycle by providing a "loop wave"style bicycle rack. 5. Required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement. Response: No bicycle parking spaces will be rented or leased. 6. Areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Response: Bicycle parking spaces will be reserved for bicycle parking only and located adjacent to the existing bicycle parking spaces. D. Paving. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e. pavers, asphalt, concrete, other pervious paving surfaces, or similar material. This surface must be designed and maintained to remain well drained. Response: The bicycle parking area is paved with concrete. 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -17- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR 18.765.080—Off-Street Loadina Reauirements A. Off-street loading spaces. Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: 1. A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; Response: One (1) off-street loading space is provided for the fuel truck, which will be located to the south of the fuel dispenser. The separate lane will allow the fuel truck to unload the fuel into the tanks without interruption to the fueling facility traffic circulation. 2. A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. Response: Not applicable. The fueling facility is less than 40,000 gross square feet. B. Off-street loading dimensions 1. Each loading berth shall be approved by the City Engineer as to design and location. Response: The fueling facility is designed so that the area where the fuel delivery truck stops and offloads fuel is separated from the dispensers and the circulation and queuing area. The offloading of fuel will not create interference with normal operations, circulation, or queuing at the fuel station. Please reference the "Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition — Fuel Truck Circulation Assessment" prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated September 5, 2013. The fueling facility queuing lanes for each pump is 118 feet — 6 inches, which exceeds the City's requirement of 75 feet. 2. Each loading space shall have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of vehicles on the site. At a minimum, the maneuvering length shall not be less than twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the facility site. Response: The fueling facility is designed to have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering. Figure 02 of the "Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition — Fuel Truck Circulation Assessment" prepared by Kittelson &Associates, Inc., dated September 5, 2013, depicts the fuel truck's proposed circulation through the parking aisles. 3. Entrance and exists for the loading areas shall be provided at locations approved by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 18.710. Response: The fuel truck enters the site from the northern right-in/right-out access closest to the fuel station. The fuel station is designed so that the area where the fuel delivery truck stops and offloads fuel is separated from the dispensers and the circulation and queuing area. The fuel truck will exit the fuel station area through the southern portion of the Costco parking lot. The fuel truck will exit the Costco site through the southern, signalized access. 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -18- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR 4. Screening for off-street loading facilities is required and shall be the same as screening for parking lots in accordance with Chapter 18.745. Response: The fuel facility loading area shall be screened pursuant to Chapter 18.745. CHAPTER 18.775—SENSITIVE LANDS The fueling facility will not be located within a sensitive area as described in Chapter 18.775. Pursuant to the Clean Water Services (CWS) letter dated June 2, 2011 (CWS file 11-000222), CWS staff concurs that the project will not significantly impact the existing Sensitive Areas found near the site. As Southwest Dartmouth Street is sloped downward, the existing landscape strip is sloped upward from the public right-of way to the existing parking lot. The sloped area is planted with existing trees and shrubs. No construction activities will occur within the sloped landscaped areas. CHAPTER 18. 790—TREE REMOVAL The landscape design maintains the existing, established trees on-site except as required for the construction of the new fueling facility. A tree removal plan will be submitted per this section. A total of 49 trees will be removed and thirty-three (33) new trees will be installed. 5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050;and Response: The applicable requirements of 18.330.050 are met as follows: A. Concurrent variance application(s): A variance is not requested for this project. B. Additional development standards: The following is a list of Vehicle Fuel Sales development standards of 18.330.050.7: Section 18.330.050.7 -Vehicle Fuel Sales Development Standards Development Standard Required Proposed Front Yard Setback 40 feet 58'-8" Side Yard Setback 20 feet North: 89'-7" South: (E) 1,736' Corner Yard Setback 40 feet N/A Rear Yard Setback 0 (E) 343'-7" Building Height 45 feet 17'-6" Minimum Lot Size 10,000 S.F. 1,188,963 S.F. Maximum Site Coverage 85% 13% Based upon our review of the requirements of Chapter 18.330.050.7 — Vehicle Fuel Sales Development Standards (outlined in the table above), the fueling facility meets the standard development requirements. 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -19- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR 6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. Response: Chapter 18.780.130.C.2 Wall Signs allows for walls signs not to exceed in fifteen (15) percent of any building face on which the sign is to be mounted. The new Costco fueling facility complies with Chapter 18.780.130.C.2 as follows: Wall Sign Area Calculation Proposed Allowable Sign Elevation Elevation Area Sign Area Area North 72'-0x3'-0" = 20 sq ft 216x .15 = 216sgft 32.4sgft South 72'-0" x 3'-0" = 20 sq ft 216 x .15 = 216sgft 32.4sgft East 102'-0"x 3'-0" = 20 sq ft 306 x .15 = 306 sq ft 45.9 sq ft West 102'-0"x 3'-0" = 20 sq ft 306 x .15 = 306 sq ft 45.9 sq ft CHAPTER 18.810.030—STREETS A. Improvements: Response: Not applicable. No off-site street improvements are proposed. Off-site street improvements and access is part of the overall Costco Wholesale development. B. Creation of rights-of-wav for streets and related purpose: Response: Not applicable. Rights-of-way for streets and related purpose are not proposed. The fueling facility will be located within the existing Costco Wholesale parking lot. C. Creation of access easements: Response: Not applicable. No access easements are proposed. D. Street Location. width and grade: Response: Not applicable. No streets are proposed. E. Minimum rights-of-wav and street widths: Response: Not applicable. No streets are proposed. F. Future street plan and extension of streets: Response: Not applicable. No future streets are proposed. G. Street spacing and access management: Response: Not applicable. No streets are proposed. 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -20- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR H. Street alignment and connections: Response: Not applicable. No street alignment or connections are proposed. CONCLUSION Based on the forgoing criteria for the Conditional Use requirements, the proposed fueling facility complies with the minimum requirements set forth in the City of Tigard Development Code. A DET hearing was conducted on October 21, 2013 for the maximum front property line setback and building placement. DET's recommendations for moving the fueling facility canopy and additional screening to mitigate the glare resulting from vehicle headlights have been incorporated into the proposed fueling facility drawings. The City is justified in approving the Conditional Use permit, as the development of the fueling facility will meet and exceed the City of Tigard's Development standards. 3.0 CHAPTER 18.360—SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Evaluation Criteria for Major Modification to Approved Plans or Existing Development: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development; Response: Not applicable. Not a residential development. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units; Response: Not applicable. No dwelling units located on site. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765; Response: The new fueling facility will decrease the existing parking by seventy-six (76) parking stalls; therefore, 654 parking stalls will remain, and 543 is required per Chapter 18.765. However, as noted in the Transportation Impact Study, the peak half- hour demand will be exceeded on-site; therefore, Costco has an off-site employee parking agreement for peak periods. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniformed Building code; Response: No change is proposed. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20%; Response: There will not be an increase in the height of the building. The new fueling facility canopy will be 17'-6", where the existing Costco Wholesale warehouse is 30'-6". 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; Response: There are no changes to the existing location of accessways and parking area that will affect off-site traffic. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day; 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -21- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR Response: It is anticipated that the proposed Costco Gasoline addition will generate approximately ninety (90) net new weekday p.m. peak hour trip ends (or 45 net new vehicles) and approximately 110 net new weekend peak hour trip ends (or 55 net new vehicles). 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a nonresidential use by more than 10% excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet; Response: The fueling facility will consist of a 7,344-square-foot canopy, and the existing Costco Wholesale warehouse has a total floor area of 145,824. The total floor area is 153,168 square feet, which is a one (1) percent increase to the total floor area. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10%; Response: No reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or open space is proposed. The fueling facility will be located within the existing paved parking lot. 10. A reduction of project amenities below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10% where specified in the site plan: 1. Recreation facilities; Response: No recreation facilities are located on-site. 2. Screening;and/or Response: No change to the on-site screening. 3. Landscape provisions. Response: There is no reduction to the on-site landscaping. The minimum required parking lot canopy cover is thirty (30) percent, and the proposed canopy coverage is 48.67 percent (including proposed trees). The minimum required site area canopy coverage is thirty-three (33) percent, and the proposed canopy coverage is 96.85 percent(including proposed trees). 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of site development review approval which are not the subject of Subsection B.1 through 10 above this section. Response: A modification to the existing conditions imposed at the time of the site development review approval is not required. CHAPTER 18.360.090—APPROVAL CRITERIA A. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title, including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards Response: Acknowledge. The fueling facility shall comply B. Relationship to the natural and physical environment—Nonresidential development. 1. Building shall be: 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -22- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR a. Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible base upon existing site conditions; Response: The fueling facility has been located within the existing Costco Wholesale parking lot. Existing trees to be removed will be replaced with new trees. b. Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; Response: The fueling facility location is not subject to ground slumping or sliding c. Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air, circulation, and fire-fighting; Response: The fueling facility has been located approximately 367 feet from the Costco Wholesale warehouse entrance. The placement of the fueling facility allows for circulation of the vehicles and emergency vehicle turning radius. d. Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Response: Not applicable, the fueling facility consists of a covered canopy roof to provide for shelter from rain or snow, but the fueling facility canopy is open on all four(4)sides. 2. Innovative methods and techniques to reduce impacts to site hydrology and fish and wildlife habitat shall be considered based on surface water drainage patterns, identified per Section 18.810.100.A.3 and the City of Tigard "Significant Habitat Area Map."Methods and techniques for consideration may include, but are not limited to the following: a. Water quality facilities (for infiltration, retention, detention and/or treatment); b. Pervious pavement; c. Soil amendment; d. Roof runoff controls; e. Fencing to guide animals towards safe passageways; f. Re-directed outdoor lighting to reduce spill-off into habitat areas; g. Preservation of existing vegetative and canopy cover Response: The under-canopy area will be hydraulically isolated from the rest of the site and routed through an oil/water separator prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer system. The fueling facility development will not increase the stormwater runoff, resulting in no impact to the capacity of the downstream system. However, the project will improve fifty (50) percent of the overall site to current water quality standards with the use of Storm Filter catch basins. C. Exterior elevation 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -23- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR 1. Along the vertical face of single-family attached and multiple-family structures, offsets shall occur at a minimum of every 30 feet by providing any two of the following: Response: Not applicable, no single-family or multiple-family structures are proposed. D. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses — Nonresidential development 1. Nonresidential development shall provide buffering between different types of land uses — for example, between commercial and industrial uses and residential and commercial uses — and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: Response: Not applicable, the Costco site and surrounding uses are zoned General Commercial. No different types of land uses are surrounding the site. 2. On-site screening from view adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage area, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e. air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening Response: On-site screen from views of adjoining properties will be provided by providing additional landscaping surround the fueling facility, as noted in 18.620.070 Landscaping and Screening of this report, additional trees and shrubs shall be added to screen the fueling facility from Dartmouth Street. E. Private outdoor area—Multifamily use 1. Private open space such as a patio or balcony shall be provided and shall be designed for the exclusive use of individual units and shall be at least 48 square feet in size with a minimum width dimension of four feet; and Response: Not applicable, no multifamily use is proposed. 2. Wherever possible, private outdoor open spaces should be oriented toward the sun; and Response: Not applicable, no multifamily use is proposed. 3. Private outdoor spaces shall be screened or designed to provide privacy for the users of the space. Response: Not applicable, no multifamily use is proposed. F. Shared outdoor recreation areas- Multifamily use. 1. In addition to the requirements of subsection E of the section, usable outdoor recreation space shall be provided in residential developments for the shared or common use of all the residents in the following amounts: Response: Not applicable, no multifamily use is proposed. 2. The required recreation space may be provided as follows: 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -24- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR Response: Not applicable, no multifamily use is proposed. 3. Shared outdoor recreation space shall be readily observable to promote crime prevention and safety. Response: Not applicable, no multifamily use is proposed. G. Where landfill and/or development for a nonresidential use is allowed within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain, the city shall require consideration of the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle plan. Response: Not applicable, the site is not located within the 100-year floodplain. H. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention- Nonresidential development. 1. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that the public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility;and Response: The fueling facility shall provide lighting to provide for safety. The fueling facility attendants shall monitor the facility during business hours. In addition, close circuit cameras are provided to monitor the fueling facility. 2. These areas may be defined by, but not limited to: a. A deck, patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine b. A trellis or arbor c. A change in the texture of the path material d. Sign, or e. Landscaping Response: Not applicable to the fueling facility I. Crime prevention and safety—Nonresidential development 1. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; Response: Not applicable, no windows are installed at the fueling facility 2. Interior service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; Response: Not applicable, no interior service areas are proposed; 3. Mailboxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; Response: Not applicable, no mailboxes for the fueling facility are proposed. 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -25- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR 4. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime;and Response: The exterior lighting will be oriented over the fueling positions to provide a well-lit area for the customers. 5. Lighting fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stair, ramps and abrupt grade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so the light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Response: Lighting fixtures are provided in all areas having heavy pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Existing parking lot lights illuminate the existing parking lots, and new lighting within the fueling facility shall provide LED lighting which overlaps to illuminate the entire area under the fuel canopy. J. Public transit. 1. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route; Response: Not applicable, existing provisions have been made in regards to transit for the Costco Wholesale warehouse development. An existing TriMet Bus stop is located approximately 175 feet northwest of the Costco Wholesale property line and approximately 475 feet to the proposed fueling facility. 2. The requirements for transit shall be based on: a. The location of other transit facilities in the area, and b. The size and type of the proposal; Response: Acknowledged. 3. The following facilities may be required after city and Tri-Met review: a. Bus shelters, b. Turnouts for buses, and c. Connecting paths to the shelters. Response: Acknowledged. K. Landscaping 1. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapters 18.745 and 18.790; Response: All landscaping has been designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.745 and 18.790 see Chapter 18.75 and 18.790 response the landscape chapter requirements and enclosed landscape drawings. 2. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections E and F of the section, a minimum of 20% of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas shall be landscaped;and 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -26- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR Response: 56.4 percent of the gross area including parking, loading and service areas will be landscaped. 3. A minimum of 15% of the gross site area shall be landscaped. Response: As noted above 56.4 percent of the gross site area will be landscaped. L. Drainage. All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan. Response: All drainage has been designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 mast drainage plan and ODEQ requirements. M. Provisions for the disabled. All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447. Response: The fueling facility has been designed for the disable in accordance to the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447— Plumbing, Architectural Barriers. CONCLUSION The fueling facility meets the Site Development Review criteria set forth in Chapter 18.360 for the City of Tigard Development Code. The fueling facility shall be developed within the existing paved parking lot of the Costco Wholesale property which will create minimal impact to the surrounding natural environment. The proposed on-site landscaping and trees will exceed current development standard. As demonstrated above, the fueling facility will meet the intent of the Site Development review giving regard to the natural environment and the elements of conserving and enhancing the appearance of the City. 4.0 CHAPTER 18.370—VARIANCES AND ADJUSTMENTS A Development Adjustment Criteria is requested for the fueling facility front yard setback of sixty- eight(68)feet where a maximum of forty (40)feet is allowed within the C-G zoning district. DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENT CRITERIA a. A demonstration that the adjustment requested is the least required to achieve the desired effect; Response: The City of Tigard setback standards for the C-G District require a minimum of 10 feet with a maximum of 40 feet setback from the front property line. The new fueling facility canopy will be set back approximately 68 feet from the property line. The increase in setback is needed to allow for the required turning radius of emergency vehicles, fuel deliver trucks, and the vehicles exiting the fueling facility while also maintaining the required twenty (20)-foot front yard vegetative corridor setback. b. The adjustment will result in the preservation of trees, if tress are present in the development area; Response: The adjustment to the maximum setback requirement would not result in the preservation of trees. Existing trees within the development area will be required to be removed. New trees will be planted to replace the trees that will be displaced, and the resulting tree and shrub mass will exceed the existing landscape improvements. c. The adjustment will not impede adequate emergency access to the site; 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -27- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR Response: An adjustment to the setback requirement is to allow for adequate turning radius of emergency vehicles. Existing emergency access shall remain. d. There is not a reasonable alternative to the adjustment which achieves the desired effect. Response: Alternative locations have been reviewed, and we have found that the location of the fueling facility is the best possible location based upon sound site planning practices. The fueling facility is located so it is outside of the primary parking field that is nearest to the front door of the Costco Wholesale warehouse. Placing the fueling facility at the peripheral corner of the site will allow for a natural separation of the gas station and warehouse circulation. CONCLUSION The Development Adjustment to the maximum setback is required for the fueling facility to provide adequate circulation and landscaping. The fueling facility will comply with the Tigard Triangle Design Standards of creating a high-quality mixed-use employment area. Improved vegetative buffer between the street and parking field will further enhance the appearance of the area. As demonstrated granting the adjustment to the front yard setback will not impact the appearance, health, safety, or welfare of the surrounding area. 6324.004-Project Narrative-2014-01-22.docx -28- Costco Loc. No. 111 Tigard, OR • BASE NE • `� [ PROJECT DATA 1/ i . CLIENT: COSTCO WHOLESALE „ -(70 999 LAKE DRIVE 7 COONCCRRETE ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 I to7 rn -- , ' nil ,, \ PROJECT ADDRESS: 7850 S.W.DARTMOUTH J I Q 434' D TIGARD,OR. 97223 Ems. ' •� SITE AREA: 14.86 ACRES(647,301 S.F.) --- BALER JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD -.i. "' • _ 0 BOUES PLAN -- EXIST. \I INFORMATION:NDARIPREPARED THIS BYHAS USINGBEEN A ... COMPACTOR Eus, p161 MULVANNYG2 SCRUBBER PIT t B NCOSTCO --,--L— ARCHITECTURE SITE PLAN wE UEA n MST.. ---' Bs \ DATED 6/94. oELINBATION olusANosEPARw1aa N 36' 1 1_ 1 UNE MANHOLE COVERS N BUILDING DATA: PIALET CAGE —TRANSFORMER BUILDING AREA: 140,640 S.F. .se— ® A TIRE CENTER: 5,184 S.F. _ t__ ___ __ �� 1Oi TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 145,824 S.F. RECEIVING / �J / EXISTING ,0 PARKING DATA: 68 EXIST.TIRE CENTER / PARKING I y 5 — — ,/// 0 \ / PARKINGWIE PROVIDED: c'S% ® 10'WIDE COMPACT STALLS 32 STALLS 1 B • ;meg , (#� 10'WIDE STALLS 474 STALLS KNG / 9 9'WIDE STALLS 217 STALLS c CHG / , \ aHCHANDICAP STALLS 21 STALLS N ; EXIST. % �� '7n fi1 - - --- - m \ TOTAL PARKING 744 STALLS IEXIST. ENTRANCE,• %; J / NO.OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. by b '4: a ®®' OF BUILDING AREA:(145,890 S.F.) 5.1 STALLS 334' osr.� ale a • OWDP ® � E n . 0 ' VICINITY MAP B1 .,... oHD 3 `, ® ®' 18 18 ]Y� L" 3-,-- S:J ,' �'� © Lf5 p4y. '� — V ,t, cr, • a , C C �aV� ____, — T • 1 ___ 3P LS &' I_ SP' i0• — & _— Pr -_ &' _ - 61' _ - fi4' _ &' - &' 1 --- C G EXISTING �_ o I — - D C -_ -_-PARKING -- -__--.__ -I —t O 99 " PROJECT ( - - SITE e• c TIGAR :$." D / DG WETUWD DELINEATION UNE J __- C C _ --._. _ —�.__._ �- NOTES: „ � , J �� i EXISTING CONDITIONS TO BE HELD VERIFIED. c ) PP 17- 0_ _ PROJECT'HISTORY I, '9 I SCOPE OATE(m-y)I UPDATED BY PROJ.MGR. WHSE.PLANS COMMENTS W '� ```. /� O r 2J01 KJ JGI el. �{'/ I ,0 15�� .y 12A1 KJ ELS ADDED SCRUBBER PIT 1<� _ I G 12.01 KJ ELS ADDED TRAFFIC SIGNAL 0 IR 20' 40' BO' \ DARTMOUTH ROAD _ I 15 10,-,D JLC JLC EGRESS DOOR WILLED I I COSMO WNOLEBiALE TIGARD,OR #111 7850 SW DARTMOUTH ST TIGARD,OR 97223 \I 1110112TH AVE.NE I SUITE 600 BELLEVUE,WA 198000 2425.4832000 I 1425063.2002 MUlranny52.0om I 95-1840 JANUARY 28,2010 EXISTING SITE PLAN COSTCO WHOLESALE EXISTING SITE PLAN EX1.1 TIGARD, OREGON JANUARY 28, 2010 ____ "—BASE PROJECT DATA .�— J ),,; 1! I J, —,♦ p,` CLIENT: COSTCO WHOLESALE •, / I III I CU I I I I I i I+B 2 C V -- �© 999 LAKE DRIVE iRETE B i� I� 2s� ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 7 7 °� r rn rn 1f' rn —► 0 FO ♦ ® PROJECT ADDRESS: 7850 S.W.DARTMOUTH / /I y /, � C •_ ♦ :� TIGARD,OR. 97223 I — Ems. ti'=�° ♦ ® SITE AREA: 27.29 ACRES(1,188,962.99 S.F.) BALE0. m�o. } r�.'i Ili '� i�," �\ !� JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD . a•I f- 9 EXIST. ! .-� ~► =♦ •® .- ZONING: C-G(PD)-GENERAL COMMERCIAL, ff —COMPACTOR All..L • . •- LUJ -: 1� ` PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ExIST •I II I X \. , SCRUBBER ^-� / WERA� �i I J '� S ♦o BOUNDARIES THIS PLAN HAS BEEN OFLNFAnON MANHOLECOVERSTOR _\ = t ♦ :'\ INFORMATION: PREPARED BY USING A NE —EMT COSTCO : -•► - \ •'(\X ®\`\\ FRONTIER LAND SURVEYING 1 _BALLET.. _TRANSFORMER A_[ 111,4 [ - \ NIHOLESA/C �� � �\ PLAN DATED 10/30/13. F - 1 / , H 1 [ J . �I L L II CI \yI. LANDSCAPE DATA: RECEIVING • -4 .I. f- ♦, 0 (, EXISTING AREA: 671,325.24 S.F.(56.46%OF SITE) -- / EXIST.TIRE CENTER -► p ♦ 4. PROPOSED AREA: 671,562.34 S.F.(56.48%OF SITE) 1, O .: c I all I-I-•+-_I a II 0 ) \TM„ / BUILDING DATA: IIII MST.B a RACKS" �V, O !I� u I II I_ • I II L II I I \ ♦` 9� BUILDING AREA: 140,640 S.F. 1 I EXIS1 OEM/ALS te r; r© TIRE CENTER: 5,184 S.F. 1 11c7CBS-Q) Y \ -- �J_ ��i q r, q q p ' ♦ A\v TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 145,824 S.F. 1 • IXIST.FXR 1 41.-�_I _' d °tl E ;';�— _�I-moi �� I'•-• I \ �® �\ EXISTING PARKING DATA:—AREAOF , • 1. I, Ic§V NULL . I� , . i , J u . v SHLA" , 4 PARKING PROVIDED: i WORK Exlsr :I ©NO tr i ♦ ' o ❑ 10'WIDE COMPACT STALLS 32 STALLS _ __ �-F -.. /ENTRANCE Z • "'N 'I'.•\ '�\' I I� n l r l \ `•"• .� I ® 10'WIDE STALLS 467 STALLS /dD� I* � Ik I li O 1� ' ®9'WIDE STALLS 210 STALLS . `jL� 6. , .- R v. �.. .... �1IIBIII UIHIILI)R Ie, lT 0HE J I - He HANDICAP STALLS 21 STALLS ,, ` I - ®WI- $) ( TOTAL PARKING 730 STALLS P C a°� I;likI .s NO.OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. ©_I - s c : ,s iz I ® aT 0- _ 1s I E ly m<., 7. o ` ' —LI- — I rX 1 OF BUILDING AREA:(145,890 S.F.) 5.00 STALLS HI L- —I X' ttl PROPOSED PARKING DATA: (] — - - 4J— �:: r N — __ c c I c _ I o o o o •I-.. I PROPOSED PARKING: — �j — I �.I ; r , ® 10'WIDE COMPACT STALLS 32 STALLS •• • • I T _-_ ��' . 1 ® 10'WIDE STALLS 391 STALLS N - c i • c •• -� I QJ I 9'WIDE STALLS 202 STALLS _ ° c1 I I'-� fiI is He HANDICAP STALLS 21 STALLS 4 f I c c n _ II _ TOTAL PARKING 646 STALLS wEnw°°EuuPnnoN LRrE� \ l _ I c c 4_, 'L.Y� _Y I' 4 8 ° 0 p \\\���lJ E c i — NET PARKING LOSS 84 STALLS C'� A%_ ` I� t _b 4, t C ®l t^��( &-7::t- � � _4I I r r`; ® 10'WIDE STALLS 76 STALLS B 15 &� , -�=i siIir 1 u i=i - �� 0 9'WIDE STALLS -8 STALLS I 'I I9I I II I i r •� t V j t' ( '' -- I t , .1 NO.OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. Ecrs L> y, //� r -0 OF BUILDING AREA:(145,890 S.IF.) 4.43 STALLS I� : �;I © � 6�� � A c`�� NOTES: - -- -- - - �pT��� /� I I ii " EXISTING CONDITIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. 0 4: B \ \ % ..•............ ae _____------_'M-81-- x' ��vlsuaL rx€dRAI E� i -- / �� o -- _— —�" % VICINITY MAP COsico /moi L.. / , / .`• - .. __ � .... I TIGARD,OR I .1-.:,--,-------- ® #111 • I eec) /'`O 7850 SW DARTMOUTH ST TIGARD, �j AREA OF WORK -7 B OR 87223 I I il 1 ,% IPPIN I / CO m�^� PROJECT �� / - SITE I /• ( 1110 112TELLE UE A 1 NON I BE2000 I r•WA I Biba /, TIGARD uzs.ass.zoao I r•126 463 11 i' 1 1 MuMeee,cz,wn 1 / NOTES: / I EXISTING CONDITIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. 95-1840-16 JANUARY 16,2014 CONCEPT SITE PLAN COSTCO WHOLESALE CONCEPT SITE PLAN DD1 1-15 TIGARD, OREGON JANUARY 16 , 2014 100-0" / - 1r-0 34'-0' _ 34',0' 1r-0- SIGN LIGHT EI-N___ \ \ 1\Wm %i . =Nil • Mal • 111111. ® MOUNT SUCANOPY FASCIA BY CANOPYPPPU EACH SIDE /' OF CANOPY FOR INCOMING AND PREFINISHED METAL FASCIA PANEL PPEFNISHED METAL COLUMN. OUTGOING TRAFFIC(5104 TIP) p SPRAYLAT COLOR FAWN r"SPRAYLAT COLOR FAWN 3S oz ti Ft2 III 111 ��g o w E� o W kd1:14 _ 111 DISPENSER O 1. 11WANG �' WRONG ISLANDS DIVILDRADJM WINGS ' 1.... WAY M,Ay f� ,My CML ORAWINGS� CEAST ELEVATION (WEST SIM.) SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" TS-0' * / P4 -E7 \ L � SIGNAGE AREA TABULATION (CANOPY SIGNS) 1E= r F� ,— - I I Q . SIGN DETAIL SIZE AREA(S.F.)EA. TOTAL S.F �. 4 COSTCO GASOLINE 3 2'-4"X 8'-5 3/8" 20 S.F. 80 S.F. uu 0 o TOTAL SIGNAGE AREA 80 S.F. Li U LL o u 8,-s 3/8 o,it ��\J _ 'COSTCO','SAFE7Y REO'SW40B7(RED) cji; i E3 ` Q RAISED CONCRETE ISLAND . `1' E WITH METAL EDGE FORM, wZ PAINT GLOSSBLACK 19 >111 ENTRANCEM 9i E7(IT SIDE / _ ! L-'GASOLINE AND(3)STRIPES'LAPIS LAZULI'SW1805(BLUE) SIDE H L_IIILII!rlli.M2AH ______� .J L .____.__.0 11 SOUTH ELEVATION (NORTH SIM.) CANOPY SIGN ® SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" C SCALE' 1/2"=1'-0" 1--11 imi U _ r— ©SIM. �® \ TYPICALggi INSULATED III .moi -I� STEEL FACED I -- - SAFETY GLASS W INSULATED• SS i AC UNIT • a INSULATED O SAFETY GLASS >' i PANELS•PAINTED =jl ` _ :-- CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE FlNISH: > m \. -�.X liri Sr- IWO!' . I M.I��.-�I O ''� ISPRAYLAi'COLOR FAWN' I / iii J L J • • L L LJ © �I WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION C CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS _,___,/, T KEY PLANCC:05TC° w ELEVATIONS 02.04.2013 wHoisSALE 95-1840-16 / ,..___ CleanWater Services April 02, 2013 SPL expires April 02, 2015 ANGELO BOLOGNA BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC 18215 72ND AV SOUTH KENT WA 98032 Re: Retail Fueling Facility CWS file 11-000222 (Tax map 1S136CD Tax lot 02200, Tax map 2S101 BB Tax lot 01201, Tax map 2S101 BA Tax lot 00200) Clean Water Services has reviewed the Service Provider Letter issued on June 03, 2011 for file 11-000222. District staff has evaluated the Service Provider Letter conditions and project plans and found them to be in compliance with Resolution and Order 07-20 (R&O 07-20). Please attach this letter to the existing Service Provider Letter for all applications made after June 1, 2007, to demonstrate compliance with R&O 07-20. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at (503) 681-3639. Sincerely, „.„,„ - 2e/t/4-e Y Ci:1-vai------"- ,,,,,A-. Laurie Harris Environmental Plan Review 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 Phone: (503)681-3600 • Fax: (503)681-3603 • cleanwaterservices.org CleanWater Services June 02, 2011 Expires: June 1, 2013 Angelo Bologna BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC 18215 72ND AV SOUTH KENT WA 98032 RE: Retail Fueling Facility CWS file 11-000222 (Tax map 1S136CD Tax lot 02200, Tax map 2S101 BB Tax lot 01201, Tax map 25101 BA Tax lot 00200) Clean Water Services has received your Sensitive Area Certification for the above referenced site. District staff has reviewed the submitted materials including site conditions and the description of your project. Staff concurs that the above referenced project will not significantly impact the existing Sensitive Areas found near the site. As a condition of approval, the vegetated corridor shall be enhanced by removing invasive non-native plant species (e.g., Himalayan blackberry and Scotch broom). The attached site plan identifies the enhancement location and specifies enhancement methods. In light of this result, this document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20, Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, state, and federal law. This letter does NOT eliminate the need to protect Sensitive Areas if they are subsequently identified on your site. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 681-3639. Sincerely, l / P dir Laurie Harris Environmental Plan Review Attachment(1) 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 Phone: (503)681-3600 • Fax: (503)681-3603 • cleanwaterservices.org r PROJECT DATA ' __ _ • �_--___ _ . ( ___— G, ` CLIENT: 999SLAKE DRIVE SALE ,/ + / J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 + '\`+ ISSAQUAH,WA 98027 ../ ruuw M + O� PROJECT ADDRESS: 7850 S.W.DARTMOUTH 7 �,] " 434 n" I /---♦ ` TIGARD,OR. 97223 / I _ +. ♦ r SITE AREA: 14.86 ACRES(647,301 S.F.) — + 1' = I I ♦♦♦�� `, JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD1 ur AREA OF WORK — I I ♦ BOUNDARIES THIS PLAN HAS BEEN — s • * . INFORMATION: PREPARED BY USING A MULVANNYG2 �B-COMM — �I �O �. ARCHITECTURE SITE PLAN wea asaril b.. I ` DATED 6/94. _ w ^ iN. SWATS* .td4 36 Y ' �• s �, BUILDING DATA: I =7Rvcc `<' COSMO1 Y 0 • ., BUILDING AREA: 140,640 S.F. I nv+vn • TIRE CENTER: 5,184 S.F. �-. \— j � " '� - s �6$` `. 1 TOTAL BUILDING AREA 145,824 S.F. �' RECEMNG 1 ��1 EXISTING PARKING DATA: 1 EXIS7.TIRECENTER I Y �� \�, 'Sj PARKING PROVIDED: �� �+ ( I I a fl+ `'- C,S, R 10'WIDE COMPACT STALLS 32 STALLS �) '� a— L I 1 - I - � 12•9 1D'WIDE STALLS 468 STALLS 1 .. L ))) 1 :.. 0>9'WIDE STALLS 210 STALLS or �- 'oI.G �4 l' �"' a' �1CHANDICAP STALLS 20 STALLS �,\I I .ti:' r • ( `; TOTAL PARKING 730 STALLS we / / � `' OF BUILDING STALLS PER1000S.F. AREA OF WORK {; �■■�, ■ • OF BUILDING AREA(145,890 S.F.) 5.OD STALLS 3 ' p,...,;,..„, ,,:://0zQ�e e ■1'±Y± ± ft -- ® ~1 PROPOSED PARKING DATA: MIL ` v I I �y� y} �/,�1 �J % y r/,� .,-- . -V.. - ... . .IGO !� ng� CLnI■t'L■YIaIar a®10WIDESTALLS��� ����/ � _ � 271 STALLS _� ®9'WIDE STALLS 0 E : �I I 1 1 Gj 0 0 4 fl= O= 0.1.-7— m « •��j 1 I ®Hc HANDICAP STALLS 20 STALLS TO I I A ' a _ % / I TOTAL PARKING 650 STALLS - �_ M ✓ cc o NET PARKING LOSS -80 STALLS '� t Il>n �KI I 1 w ` „ ` I I I u I I ,, x - ,”ol ":^' I El 10'WIDE COMPACT STALLS 0 STALLS J a e1. 8 71 B 8 -141 STALLS \ ; I) I J + ;_ I ®10'WIDE STALLS ;* j f I — I I %//////// e \\\\\\\\` I • _ � I NO.OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. 4.46 STALLS _ 1 — I j , 1 _ 1 1 1 1 ? % '.-f OF BUILDING AREA:(145,890 S.F.) I C c !,-'?- . w m NOTES: /� • 1 1 i I 1= e c _ f �,- --.. EXISTING CONDITIONS TO 8E FIELD VERIFIED. xstuwwa navtx --/ 1 1 1 `I' 1— a a 1 1 1 1 = e 1 1 \ j 1�♦ c_ . c ) _ — lid° ° e a ■ L . 1 , ; --- — —-�— �~—� (`` , jl + V e?�c-teo,�r1 P,v► C2-(44-WA- ``1� . 11 11 ;_1- 1 * NI I I ' _- --v___ u , i'- '� a vim. �►4u+V�ce wl�wk 51/tali. i \ �� - e.. 4. . a,Q p �� 04116 DARTMOUTH ROq �—� li�vvwvcJl a 1��VUS��� 4�o4t- ptc ve, ecies 0 • _ �i ,VW-WA d I�r wee (tin i. ti - -. . _ eA 'R.5'{- AREA OF WORK - G lei W afer Ser.rtic�s' t _ : = Co ,. ��.+� M(�v,�wvte w� Cy cle , Z 00 17 U'^'t i 1 - -o„JF U - � - �° VICINITY MAP TIGARD,OR sgur v� o 't J l.c t4t ve .tial cave. CANS •R le IS O. ti–OD0Z2.2. - #111 e �asosw DARTMOUTH i srnrnRn. 51(04-R �/2, �}� wilr�I rnC� t+gyp" Approved m 1 /1/1 OR 9J?xt 've -tue AKA, 5k Clean Water Services .` -�� e,,c+Vsfir uta t't e ly 1► vtet. , latcw-v i, n�vnnI r�Y �. c:�eS le avtied avews lard *ail By L W*-tt Date(e/ /t, .,) � h ` +15o++7M AYE+E 1 SWF= aavuerm StnPLl ►�G Seeded P� al , W 14 x/1 `� PROJECT ' 1 r"'�70°i 5�' ft. • J(3 l- LGII-V LN1''L CII ' ` 0 F @ `� SITE vla�ivr✓ �,1rU/* 5 °`� 100 A area( CI) 95-1840 mmmczm.1 TIGARD09 1/e/rrA �a~. \ FEBRUARY 01,2011 JJ NOTES: PRELIMINARY SITE EXISTING CONDITIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. PLAN COSTCO WHOLESALE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN P1.1-14 TIGARD, OREGON FEBRUARY 01 , 2011 GHAV m ik x PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CALCULATIONS y 4 <, A'Q ENG041° Date: August 9, 2013 Prepared By: Chris M. Tebaldi, P.E., Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. RE: Water Quality Improvements Costco Wholesale Fuel Facility Addition 7855 S.W. Dartmouth Road, Tigard, Oregon 97223 Costco Location No. 111 /Our Job No. 6324 The proposed Costco Wholesale Fuel Facility Addition consists of approximately 54,230 square feet (1.25 acre) of disturbance and is located at 7855 S.W. Dartmouth Road in Tigard, Oregon. The site is located at the northeastern end of the existing Costco Warehouse store along Dartmouth Road. The proposed development consists of the construction of a new fuelling facility with nine (9) new fuel dispensers. The fuelling facility installation is considered a redevelopment as determined by the 2007 Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards. As dictated by the Design and Construction Standards, the impervious area at the fuel facility triggers the requirement that 50 percent of the undisturbed impervious for the site must have upgraded water quality treatment to meet the current standard. The stormwater treatment for the fuelling facility will involve the replacement of the seven on-site catch basins with Stormfilter catch basins. In addition, a new Stormfilter catch basin will be installed in the proposed fuelling facility. This is based on the water quality treatment design standards that require 0.36 inches over a 4-hour period to be treated. Based on this requirement, a single 15 gpm Stormfilter cartridge can treat 16,043 square feet of drainage cartridge. The drainage basin areas have been identified on the enclosed Water Quality Basin Map along with the required number of cartridges for each drainage basin. The new Stormfilter catch basins will discharge to the existing conveyance system. This storm drainage system flows south to the existing wetland located southeast of the existing Costco Warehouse. The new facilities will be maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' recommendations and in accordance with the requirements of the City of Tigard and Clean Water Services. The proposed stormwater treatment facilities have been designed to comply with applicable standards and regulations. Attachments: Water Quality Basin Map 6324.006.doc Ty _ TIGARD l N IL A C ,-, ,. *1/4.,,, .. A .ok .. F WAPOSCGASOLINE S A A 3 s i - • 77---i---L \ \ Z Q U , 1=307 moi• /�, ♦� `� _-� _ �� SS • �� 1 Sp �J • ' 0 15 30 60 (^ �� -- 0 / ,A ,(-s /4.''.7 do.-7--7-i r____.-f-_:___7 7---________________.-—:______.____-_—______.___________—_____.___-,_-_____.. -------.___ ...,---__-----__....___—__..._...,_--______--:----__, ......--- __,.,--- a 1,\,,,,\ .._.--\ ifs O . > . .: ,,,.,-"s I ... ,_,_,ad - g <in < CC Z / / moi/ � 0 ' - \''''-*:4'''''''-'11--C-7‘ x \ — _ ^!� ' ' '!� V w7<. . 7 / ,- • ..- r, Z < — H. .......... ��N NO I J F— Q / '',// ,_-;! \ \ .. . / / /j/////.. 4 ..._____,... mfr --�. 1,1 1 �•/ / ` I I I I I I I I L�3Tgl� \ V, CJ. -A- v‘ ' ---17(41 wA'i, •• ■ `�v O1 . 'z ---___ I ---1 y. 4:* `. / :`� // / a ~ iBASIN D4 Q � �, / � T.7-:''' ''::::\---1...-' � � /9-,.#°.°•''--#-""� `�.."47'4,f � AREA="�7,437 SF.. SD \ � 7.____.\_._ 11,-i'l'\‘v_i_11;\\ �-el 0 1)''''' \:_,:i /---- 0000/11111164" ---.._._____..H ._ ,11 1/4 -- Q E— QA I-- l4 A/q 0 t.11,••• \ ________-r--0 (1.1 _N _4_______r ==t . ::_v r___,_ / � / %�/ ;„,/- / f'-'1k-i'4 ,7 / z<_:',/,':,;>-:. �►° �. ° _ t p}� jr----t__ moi' _-11:----P— ' 00 /LL- -7 f X ., 7 / +y /°� /��j�+ / /a/ O ` IItt/ I �-- I �7r ) r iri it JL •,- �' ,�`ll 1I ' / /�� "� _ I oI ;7 , IN _cL ,► =.SKI® ©� i a , \\ Y z 1%. ` q /Q n �� - ����� , . -.1-------H: • 1 1 III / ' : , ”! �—� , e _ . -�� I-i .*;=-:-. A----- � . .r� // I�n1X n u Y I n / �. a uR n �y 1I / I -rum L�� IJu/ j ��'�►�� � a-a � � J � IIS � I u t � • � �les ��` [ 0 �, /f/ /// `am�'C _ ' °�' I —a \� ISI wI T 41V . / --� - n" In , Y ., ,;-- I ____________...__.I -------- In 1 1:===i ' .111.10L ..,.., ..."..."---.-..........., / 7Trit ..-..--.'""----- .."1 r 1 Hi )'I )1' I" -. , i'c\I aa —ter r I „ . �� r ' I V•///) 2 n X(n 1�I i ) ‘ / IIIltt I� ' IInC _ / �I'-' � II �\45/ //! n n �vN- \ : TO ‘\, �♦ �✓ / j�'� nn / ���_� IL�� �; II u _ v ','��1T'� tt_i / tt � —_—----I � '� � � /�'�' tx � xCA ,-, 1 it �� `�. - - - , - � -�. I � _ -:- -� _ ,� // ,� � R//`' ( n ' ' IEX. 10” PVC SD4. / / , •./�%�� ���~\ -`-- . . . . - ����'.._ NOTE• a - )14 f :II xl . „ ;; \ �� / ✓" ' 1. REMOVE EXISTING Q CATCH BASINS AND INSTALL NEWW =1/��,// l /i • • • ° �Tf " ,, -rte Ltt.. _ `� i / - �.- I,� _` rr i�` 11aNf / _-- a , r/ I �\ i / j/ „ STORMFILTER CATCH BASINS IN PLACE. WQQ�� // "l/�,d' o • • • • - - : °''' 11 Y INVERT ELEVATION OF EXISTING�////%„ � _' . � , , _' _� _� ;-'�$ 1_ � , - �",i- � " x ''. matt_�i 'L� r rr � / l��l � „�■ / IN DI ., i , n n r I /� „ 2STOORMAPIPESTO VERIF Q11/�1/l _� • N 17, , , T n 11 „ 8 �,I ,'EA=40,729 SFS=__ _ _�l i - I ' ///(1/ p T RMINED THAT EXISTING STORM PIPESARENT / u L - /// /,.` �� °„ — = r i 1 I ' !U p1 / ,� Yj3. IFFTERDEE R SHALL INSTALL NEW STORM W0) Q 1' KEYSTO / +, g ��� r � II 9” � / � � // pf\WALL ■ / / /��t . a ��M _ "tt - / ,; �, / ,� /AREA=45, SF BASIN D5 r r � „ DEEP ENOUGH, CONTRALTO/� / r--irIY 1n 1V r l na/////// ! ~ � � " I , \� � AREA=45,593 S� � �/// � DRAIN LATERAL. O r • • p rI `� / l \ uNI —.1 i '' '' A n / .I 7LIME I 1li i I I • ~` n „ I, il/ �� en� � I PAO o � n ► 4 n to�/ / ' 4. /// ,/ 0 - q AINA/ / ” - -a.- �_ - • •____ ��_ _ '_ 1 �3F� � ( ' �� ,.Id� S nN • `_\� '� 1� Il...s �' il11 ' I— // �� ; • jl V '` .. NIP"1/ STORM DR GE KEYNOT�r(( ( M;�! —I� IIP �` P W� - �+.� N i 1 NEW SFCB#1 ANEW SFCB#5 (f, 1 - SD - SD -SD 1 - -S ___p_. SD SD s sr)— EX. 24 PVC D n / I I Illl I -IS.4 4� „ ��� /////Y�I . // OW/3 CARTRIDGES W/3 86 ARTRIDGES O J) 1 I QQss (gyp ss ss ss ss � 0 \ rill �., RIM 1 96 LL l i7 ' . — yr 0IE 83 SI a ax•♦ b II � II■ u _ JIL 0o I / ' W/3 CARTRIDGES _4, YI + Y F -1/ s:. =.s_ .,__ ,ee===s�aJ1 \ _ --- IIN IIJ4I`��r�:� " , GES _ z ,,.' 11 W/3 CARTRID/ i 1 c1 � u u u 'J N n Y ' �_'"H �_� MI° RIM 186 65 RIM 186 37 0 0 EX. 18" PVC SD !Iii/ ) :.Ic I x' IE-184.35 IE 184 07 0 o II'41 y a I ' 3 EWONEW1 A: I 'Sr ��• i� W j3 CARTRIDGES W/1 CARTRIDGES 'Vss �'__ yI J •■ RIM-186.75 t ' ' ^ I ♦ �� _-_- \(� —--.4. \N__ I iiii ° 1 RIM 186.14 v> IE=184.45 IE=183.84 =J I ... i iir-Di„Y \AREA=5,990 SF ;III ` 'I 1 . n u 1 ' / �'�� 4 C C 0 I �-� 4 NEW SFCB# ®NEW SFCB#8 C ; Tualatin Valley Water District 1850 SiV 170"' Ave. 0 Beaverton, Oregon 97006. 0 Phone: (503) 642- 1511 a Fax: (503) 649-2733 o www.tvlvd org STATEMENT IF SERVICE AVAILABILITY PROPOSED PROJECT NAME: COSTCO FUELING STATION PROPOSED DEVEI.,OPMENT ACTION : FUEL STATION CONSTRUCTION • EXISTING USE : APPLICANT OR AGENT: COMPANY: ADDRESS : • PHONE: OWNER(S): NAME: . ADDRESS: PHONE: • Property Description: Tax Map(s) : Lot Numbers: 1 S136CD 02200 • Site Size: Site Address: 7855.. SW DARTMOUTH, PORTLAND. OR 97223 • Nearest Cross Street: SW PACIFIC HWY The District will provide service from a 8-inch line. stub-out from a 12-inch main located in SW • Dartmouth Street. • The proposed use will be required to make the necessary connections and/or extensions of water mains to serve the subject property and will be as shown on plans submitted for approval prior to connection to the system. 'AY / / 7r--- g g-a 1a. SIGNATURE: DATE: ZOO POSITION :POSITION : dorto Faciallon aomae . V KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES , INC . TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLAN N I N G 610 SW Alder Street, Suite 700, Portland, OR 97205 503.228.5230 503.273.8169 Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition — Fuel Truck Circulation Assessment Date: September 5, 2013 Project#: 11367 To: Mike McCarthy, PE, City of Tigard From: Sonia Hennum, PE, PTOE & Kelly Laustsen, Kittelson &Associates, Inc. CC: David Rogers, Costco Wholesale John Ellingsen, Barghausen Consulting Engineers Ed Galliway, Mulvanny G2 Architecture Project: Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition—Tigard, Oregon Subject: Fuel Truck Circulation Assessment Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (KAI) reviewed and evaluated anticipated fuel truck circulation and operations for the proposed Costco Gasoline fuel station addition to the existing Costco development located on SW Dartmouth Street in Tigard, Oregon (known as the Tigard Costco). The review was conducted to assess on and off-site impacts of fuel truck deliveries and queuing at the existing Costco access locations. Based on the review, fuel truck deliveries can be accommodated without impacts to fuel station operations, parking lot circulation, or access operations. While there are existing peak period congestion and queuing on site at the southern driveway to SW Dartmouth Street, the improvements proposed to the eastbound approach of the driveway as part of the project (along with improvements on SW Dartmouth Street that will be implemented with the development currently under construction to the east) will improve operations, reduce queues, and mitigate impacts of the additional traffic from the proposed fuel station. Based on data from numerous other Costco Gasoline sites, fuel deliveries will be 10 or less per week (once or twice per day). For their own operations and member experience, Costco schedules these fuel deliveries for off-peak hours whenever possible. Therefore, it is unlikely that fuel truck deliveries will impact peak-hour queuing. Even if a fuel delivery were to occur during the peak hour, it would only be one truck during that entire time. Further details of the review and findings are provided in the following sections. FILENAME:H:1 PROJFILE111367- TIGARD COSTCO GASOLINE ADDITIONI TRUCK CIRCULATIONI11367 TIGARDCOSTCOTRUCK CIRCULATION MEMO .DOCX Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 September 5,2013 Page 2 BACKGROUND The proposed development plan consists of adding an 18 fueling position Costco Gasoline fuel station to the existing Costco site in Tigard, Oregon. The fuel station will be located on the northeastern portion of the site, just south of the site's northern-most access to SW Dartmouth Street (which is a right-in/right-out only access). Some of the existing parking on the site will be removed to accommodate the fuel station, The existing Costco site also has a signalized full access driveway on SW Dartmouth Street, located approximately 650 feet south of the right-in/right-out access. The signalized driveway currently has exclusive left- and right-turn lanes for vehicles exiting the Costco warehouse. In order to provide improved operations and storage for this driveway, the approach lanes will be restriped to accommodate an exclusive left-turn lane and shared left- and right-turn lane with approximately 250 feet of storage. The SW Dartmouth Street/Costco Access intersection will also be improved as part of the retail development currently under construction to the east of the Costco site. This development has been conditioned with providing an additional eastbound through lane on SW Dartmouth through the intersection and to their site. As such, capacity on both the Costco approach and the eastbound SW Dartmouth Street approach of this intersection will be increased. In addition to the changes at the site's signalized access, modifications will be made on-site to accommodate fuel truck circulation to and from the fuel station. The conceptual development site plan which highlights the proposed changes is provided in Figure 1. Fuel trucks will access the site from OR 99E via the northern-most (right-in) access and exit the site via the southern-most access. The proposed fuel truck path and circulation were assessed to identify any impacts to the fuel station, parking lot circulation, and queuing at the southern access. Costco sells two grades of fuel at their fuel stations: regular and premium. Each grade is delivered by a different truck. Fuel deliveries are scheduled once the underground fuel storage tanks are emptied to a level that can accommodate a full tanker delivery. Partial fuel deliveries are not possible from an operational and logistics perspective. Based on data from numerous existing Costco Gasoline locations, on average, there are 7 to 10 total fuel deliveries per week (or 1 to 2 deliveries per day depending on if one or both grades of fuel are needed). Whenever possible, deliveries are scheduled during off-peak hours so as to minimize interactions between delivery trucks and Costco member circulation. However, given that fuel deliveries have to occur when the underground tanks need to be replenished, the site has been designed to accommodate fuel truck circulation, even during peak times, without impact to the operations and circulation of the fuel station itself or other areas on site. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon 11367.Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition September 2013 7 +\ IS (NO SCALE) 1 -1 • , -----------------L--'L 2 �,?',�' - — - 7; + o �i m �I 1 I 3 • - + ., a; �l r ►' sed L. ® r 1 LI(V hr ,I. 1 r I' i _ �, I . II r'� L, J .-7°.-: iJ ISI �� ?� �� ��\ t tii n / , Imo-Th_ l y,r /�.ww n XT I. f 1 e� r III, l - _ "7 I 1 I' I 11 I 1 1 fI l7. I° �, © -�I . -I ; ,n1 1 I I, �. 1 1 II I I I� J a li` J p C]' T J I I I i1 r'' II f] �, I Vii e Alii /%? 1. I I r 1-: ,c) 6 t) : v II i's) 16 0 do '1 a 11 i 1 `I I I fr (::.;tom,. .y1=.,,;to.)x'> .1? ,��`if ..•- 17%Ti 11-.7I 7 it o 1 - • n I,I' t , 'r r n _ f ~ t dry r`= . M G _ - _ .-• . ,.. _ . •-, _ I Illi 9 i ' I 1 Il-O. + L' • -,; O i ':'i ;. J;a,�N y;-g. 71 I� I yrs.•, L.� i 4 ` 6 I I l 0 lJ ° '� w 1 V .ZI.E �uL l- • p I Q i1 Sat ' 0, y,,i17l,:1,.'., d'",',J ,,,: .kf- . y K re 6. -t-,.. f� F " i n i d—..''�.o„ ,r �- ,,Q w p g 1 ,1v l \,,\ i - FI '$ -)! .- < Etit3 'lI I 4; : G,' , 1 ,S, r. . -1 \ \ ,,,,‘ �, Driveways; \ .`,� `„ , F. _ � ii Improvements ,. .S> 6R Co F U iii R / \ qt w 8 i I I �,z,szz 1 . _- J I k' 1 �N 1 n r—r-- L I 11J I I t s 1 ` g sti r /r J�/� /� 1 A r I H 11 Rii I I I $C$ IPROPOSED SITE PLAN AND IMPROVEMENTS FIGURE i 1 TIGARD,OREGON 01 ' KKITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINE ERN*/PLANNING Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 September 5,2013 Page 4 ON-SITE IMPACTS The proposed fuel truck path is shown in Figure 2. The blue lines indicate the envelope of the fuel truck vehicle and extents of the truck's impact. As seen in the figure, the fuel truck enters the site from the northern right-in/ right-out access closest to the fuel station. The fuel station is designed so that the area where the fuel delivery truck stops and offloads fuel is separated from the dispensers and the circulation and queuing area. As such, fuel station operations (i.e., member payment and vehicle fueling) can continue as normal while the underground fuel tanks are being filled. The offloading of fuel will not create interference with normal operations, circulation, or queuing at the fuel station. The fuel truck will exit the fuel station area through the southern portion of the Costco parking lot. As shown in the figure, modifications have been proposed to accommodate the clearance needed for fuel trucks to circulate through the parking aisles. The figure also shows that the fuel truck path avoids the driveway area in front of the warehouse entrance and will not conflict with pedestrian activity in this area. The fuel truck will exit the Costco site through the southern, signalized access, With the proposed driveway modifications, the fuel trucks will likely use the outer left-turn lane. There is space to accommodate side-by-side movements of the fuel truck and a passenger vehicle through the intersection. SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY QUEUEING As part of the Traffic Impact Study conducted for the proposed Costco fuel station, vehicular queuing was analyzed for both Costco driveways during the weekday PM and weekend midday peak hours for the year 2014 under background conditions (without the fuel station) and total traffic conditions (with the fuel station).The analysis compared the projected 95th percentile queue lengths for both driveways to the existing available storage, as summarized in Table 1. Table 1:Queuing Analysis Summary—SW Dartmouth St/South Costco Driveway Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekend Midday Peak Hour Available 2014 Back- 2014 Total 2014 Back- 2014 Total Movement Storage(ft) ground Traffic Traffic ground Traffic Traffic Northbound Left 225 100 125 125 200 Turn Eastbound Left-Turn 100 150 250 275 400 Eastbound Right-Turn 100 25 50 100 100 Note:Queues rounded up to the nearest 25 feet Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon 11367.Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition September2013 i" 111‘44,,.. 19 (NO SCALE) f ` S .iSSL -r .� py , ..- '-'1....-',;es ` / ar � ''; * . \ ' (77,/ 7 1,0_ r 1 tit �f —T I .0 $r 1s' - r I "T_• -;il PO !r',. it i t r: ..:;.-)/ ' .. ;t: Ili_ :_A 4 7 . I — 'E:31CJ 1 J t 1 f 0 I • f : = _DT '' II • ' Toa 6 11 1 1 l i III /,. ' 9. (-) I' C� I t) 0 ® .�1I•!S � •J`1 _I, I I -I �J , 11 ` Y I°r .::#�: o4,t =11 t -.•' ,4,t .. 4t ''-6(a� , :Ti + f, Li. - ' , e 1- 4t�, II I L I I d 1‘,' S Q O I j+ dS f .i:_l__I_Ii_�y� _ _ _ . Ann ... � — l'i i'•4 ' uI I I �f�.,�fi If- 'It ' p rial.-Yi X. u•;IS.I \ 1,:.-T':‘::-.. .,--,:-..:.-,-;,-7,--,...,.„ •-'—._-"-''''''''.-7‘. h ll ) . I. l I I 1 I Il V� 11.. I+I w I psi ' r ) .-- I_'FY:j 1 1 1 CC 11 g� , h.4 '`4d 1 70' 7 1 I 1: ! ' Q'' O1 � IIIIIorll�� a —Ci T.c4,..„ i 6 cc 2.co w o ,.., ,a,rk Irl 1 11 • , 11 W IY •'' 4 ;te S 1 <CI---4 r:'::-,,r-i' 11, 1,,,,_11.t1..... 7 : . ', -L___-_,.---.--------- ,..,-,i '- - A i il NI r — bi • ra e _i ` Ai 5 w / \1 •� F W m .ifi. ._.. ,.ZS J ; { (P= 1 I PROPOSED FUEL TRUCK CIRCULATION FIGURE ,1 TIGARD,OREGON 02 , KKITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING/PLANNNG Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 September 5,2013 Page 6 As shown in Table 1, the anticipated 95th percentile queue lengths are anticipated to increase negligibly (by one to three cars) between the background and total traffic conditions for all movements except for the eastbound left-turn at the South Costco Driveway. The anticipated 95th percentile queue length increases from approximately 275 feet to 400 feet between the 2014 background conditions and total traffic conditions for the weekend midday peak hour. Right now, the approach is configured with an exclusive left-turn lane and an exclusive right-turn lane. In order to provide improved operations and storage for this movement, the approach lanes will be restriped on-site to accommodate an exclusive left-turn lane and shared left- and right-turn lane with approximately 250 feet of storage. This improvement would reduce the queue to 250 feet under 2014 total traffic conditions during the weekend midday peak hour (or to a condition better than that without the fuel station in place). As noted above, fuel truck deliveries are anticipated to occur no more than once or twice per day and typically during off-peak hours. Therefore, fuel trucks are not anticipated to impact the peak hour queuing at the site driveways. However, in the instance that a fuel truck exits the site during peak hour operations, there will be impacts to the eastbound queue at the driveway. As seen in Figure 2, the fuel truck path crosses through both eastbound lanes at the driveway. Therefore, if a fuel truck gets stopped in the queue before reaching the intersection, the rear of the vehicle may block access to the second left-turn lane. Additionally, the fuel truck is much longer than a typical passenger vehicle (approximately 75 feet), which would also increase queue lengths. This being said, the impact to queues on the eastbound approach of the driveway would be contained to only one signal cycle during which the fuel truck passes through the intersection.Therefore, while a fuel truck delivery during peak- hours would increase queues at the southern driveway, the impact would be limited (less than two minutes). CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of this review it can be concluded that fuel truck deliveries can be accommodated with the proposed modifications to the Costco parking lot and southern driveway. Fuel deliveries will be minimal (only 1 to 2 per day and less than 10 on a weekly basis). To the extent possible, the deliveries will be scheduled during off-peak hours when possible to minimize impacts to site access operations, parking lot circulation, and queuing at the southern access. There are improvements proposed as part of the project to improve existing and future operations and queuing at the site's signalized access and these will result in better queuing and operations at the site's southern access than would exist without the project. We trust that this memorandum provides the information needed related to the fuel truck circulation. Please contact us at 1-866-900-2683 or shennum@kittelson.com if you have any questions or require additional information. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon PROJECT DATA i41—1�, 11 1- 1' ( 11 �� •\Q EXISTING PARKING DATA: \ N C730.-1. --. \ .,, TOTAL PARKING STALLS TRANSFORMER 1 ,o PROPOSED PARKING DATA: �� TOTAL PARKING DD1.1-11 654 STALLS CEIVING �. 0 �— \ �,� �� \ STUDY PARKING DATA: EXIST.TIRE CENTER —� -► •• �� �9 r 1 h I �. �a �� PROPOSED PARKING: ,=4.-- I mak:,., R� y// ® 10'WIDE COMPACT STALLS 32 STALLS lie7i 10'WIDE STALLS 391 STALLS EXIST.BIKE RACKS- • v L p L I' 1 L L � 9'WIDE STALLS 202 STALLS ''Fi EXIST. (15)STALLS LOADING '' 43 `_ - . r \ DOCK _ -♦ —i •:\ _ \'®, ®Hc HANDICAP STALLS 21 STALLS BIKE CKS-{2) 4e \ \ TOTAL PARKING 646 STALLS STALLS 45 �•- r I�,I 1- 1 1 1 1 1� 1 r ,I 1 - I T� r, 1 Exlsr.EXIT Ip�� '�, NET PARKING LOSS FROM EXISTING -84 STALLS EXIST. ,'1—_ e Jr,I e N . I IT�—I__ —T- h 11 1 �q" _\ ENTRANCE (. � I f I 1 I �� t \ • NET PARKING LOSS FROM DD1.1-11 -8 STALLS 4 :.:i �� �C \I L 1 L I I L LJI. - I I L L L �' 1-.s. i f-- OHc E•- \ \ - NO.OF STALLS PER 1000 S.F. EXIST. 1 ��Hc '-� 2a OF BUILDING AREA:(145,890 S.F.) 4.43 STALLS .n. a ; __ .a..,- ENTRANCE \ 1 \`1 I 1 l f l - r a 't \\ . 1� r, _ _ 'I CANOPY `, .� V\ � � II , r 1 r 1� � S' NOTES: I. i- '- -\- 7 e,,'.'.� / �/ - .� I' I,_ I � i. 11.-.1 1 'I LI 1 ,I I �! �s.o? ® / — - e v 1 ,z f,�, ,J+ i ills ¢ EXISTING CONDITIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. ��� ,„v ��4�i� C� ��k�4 .' � • . ..... • :..�--�_� ". uunuu�unu�n��slLL '. meg.. �' 4 , � � • � • � ®� O N ' I _ / b 9� 3' t S _ i � t •-� 4 t ° - - ° 4 4t ° °fit ° `-,� - 4 t o l ID v _ ,e ° ,a 3z i� as—� STOP —,10 C C ® 1 �. ��. _ -- 23 ,t C _ C ._ iL -� SII II 24' —18 10 120' 1 — C C , , 1 • - _ _ c c it --�I c T. _ — C _C _ I �— — - I r.. 1 /�, _ c _IItJ ��--�t� tae (g� �T �• 'm — {� R �-� 1\ � —1 I 1 1`5 — _,E . r - ',. ` ` \ n f 3 t : 28�— 30' 30' f 20' "[I. - •- 1 ,. / -. - U h �.1 r: - r �;'� 9 r ��'�- t J—�I _� I '!i �I `` 89'-7• ' -�� t_I rki / N '-` _ , -(:)--':- ' \. ` ' II � i1LYY� I I I ��\.I %III i I I I � t �/ ?( • : 4 , / ./1 _,_, ______—L --L.L_______—___________7-_-___:::: Y - \ / TIGAR D,OR ' � / tmil f ,„<...--* �� i! _ x _fir ___ - - ----------- — 7850 SW DARTMOUTH ST TIGARD,OR 97223 . _` _� �9 l 77 PEPPIN r ,o i;ty /7 ,,/,/ ,,,,,,,<;,-:- 1110 112TH AVE NE I SURE 500 BELLEVUE,WA 196004 /r/ - /,'; 1425 463 2000 1425.453.20M/ i'/ Hmcam /' J 95-1840-16 NOVEMBER 8,2013 NOTES: CONCEPT EXISTING CONDITIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. TRUCK ROUTE PLAN COSTCO WHOLESALE CONCEPT TRUCK ROUTE PLAN DD15-13 TIGARD, OREGON NOVEMBER 8 , 2013 N 4 Z - . ---.. ; a / O COVERSI SHEET6. _`"`F 5—.. 0W 0.0 COSTCO WHOLESALE GAS STATION ADDITION a Ierewo four R EX. LEGEND 7855 SW DARTMOUTH TIGARD, OREGON. 97223 A r Z F EXISTING CONCRETE R PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL POLE LOCATION NO. 111 ss PROJECT i J F- U oy to SITEvp ISI O CENTERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY - LIGHT POLE LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST ONE— QUARTER OF SECTION 36, .--c. O< ' 1 0 > 4 — -- - E. sT NG BARR ER cures - POWER POLE/LIGHT POLE TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE I WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, TIGARD �' I 50 O EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE - POWER POLE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON \ - _ 0 O N OPER LINE DR KTs a o 0 - - EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT L POWER METER = _ _ VICINITY MAP = O 3 0 - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING WATER LINE POWER PISER _ _ . . . . . . .. . .. .. AAAA .. . . . , m — . — — Er. CONTOUR = JUNCTION BOX VERTICAL DATUM LO FENCE LINE r. TELEPHONE RISER 1.m1007Carl CM rrir KNUTH-KA 05- DPD .RL E a CO --- I---- - - , TELEPHONELINE fl UNKNOWN UTILITY VAULT LOT 1700 DE:,n1=N .,s e,. °-s Mc nI THE 0.11CPETE cues m 2 - - - -- - - P - - - UNDERGROUND POWER LINE sD' ,OO' R I, _ - UNDERGROUND STORM DRAINAGE LINE - GASEMETERHDL,: �oZ ---- UNDERGROUND SANITARY LINE LOT 1800 E � ' - - CONIFEROUS TREE METER FEP T. L PAPE 75E, OWNER SURVEYOR IN n DECIDUOUS TREE WATER VALVE SIGN Py L. YRP Y TAKEN FROM TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PREPARED BY EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION ON THESE PLANS WAS _ Z C oo SANITARY SERER MANHOLE STOP SIGN \G i F _ - ISSADu• E w""o" 0 m \GN , - >'`� „ I . -� A, / _ CIVIL ENGINEER PORTLAND, ENa W 2 STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE VELD SIGN PP. "t _. - � DSEry ENGINEERS, INCFAX E (503) 538 97132 '�' h 2 O CLEAN OUT O PARKING SIGN P ;OA/ - 1 1 72ND c 33 (503) 538-4633„ NOTE BCE DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN m u CATCH URB INLET DR DITCH INLET MAILBBOLLAROX - ' / < .Id4 -q '� I I '�- `,'I� ' � EAK "KENT`((:251) zS,1Sa,OzCONSTRUCTED IT IS THE O w = -_-- TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE h HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE / s"'. d4 -�I� 171 s 1'T'J';^ — _- - �I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER BE BROUGHT To THE ATTENTION of BCE PRIOR TO WORK-FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR 10 CONSTRUCRON DISCREPANCIES LL ' LU g g 11 1 TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER TO HAVE ALL IMPROVEMENTS c may` , d4 �, � - ��� � iA3 ]J7L m � � ' • SWDIBs,o svrtEn ' N $ PROPOSED LEGEND �' - + II 1 IHL � , • ONE. (so» 6441447 LU _ d4 _ - 1 it I ' FAX (503) 643-1905 =Q � , 0 PROPOSED ASPHALT �f - 1 -� 1-°, - r -7 II r4 _f , i � 'WIT_. a / P • I OQ PROPOSED CONCRETE II1 /L _ ; e - } u 9 / /O/ / SHEET INDEX ® NEW COMMUNICATION ft � 84 ,di d4 = d4 3 j* � p �+� 5. Vl i 3 .! fid LOT 2000 a EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN I- P NEW POWERCONDUIT/WRING _ der _- . ' 1.= `!Lr — � - = I (, C3 SITE IMPROWMENT PLAN DRAIN PUNGE AND c p - - - SAWCUPROPOTELNBARRERCNRB Irl — '� \ C/Ifi,�yl, i it,• j �I ' ' .� 0 ' ' C6 PBELMNARYDTLTIPLM 0 now PATH I _1 i �, " I .y: __ 1 �=1I f I' I '�(BGOB EH, EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION = LOT 2200 � a , , ( ��� p - PR SPOT 1- E 112 1 11 ,�BG < EG ExDSHBEDNREACERADE _ ; sw. .P C illi IMII `�tre tp), ) 1 , al 'p s s 21 _ -a 1 A I z ., ES ED E II 2 OR 1 PROPOSED GRADING SLOPE = �I tp f 1 Pi. ( , n k1 �'i ',,1, , e BasaTED LGN, POLE r= 71 S 17 I( ( -- � >t . A & Y o K I= II \g p >. 1 PE 7.E:Matti Moat, C T2102831 SI IISI = V LA 1 w z = 17 TR_ LOT 200 --- --- ----- — \�\ - " EASEMENT ARE \ 2 = NO D OLIGO}, 044 %,„404\\ 4w CALL BEFORE DIGGING = - M Pia 1-800-332-2344 bb8 AGO"s - NNYCMfIKT NOTE CANON POTENTIAL UTILITY CONFLICT CONTRACTORPRIORFIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING MD NEW UTILITIES TO THE coNIKICTOR HUI M RESPONSIBLE EOR VEMEMIG ENE Eutaw DRENstoo, AND !TEETH CONSTRUCTION SEE URI EH I 1 Hew NOTE Or ELL DOTING VIOLMES yIREIBER SHIM OK THESE PLANS OR NOT ef PORTOuli0 TM THE EXISTING WATER, STORM. MD m, s CE SHOtflitif0 HD setemma 112 HOR201121. AND vERTJmi HATO PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION APPROXIMATE', BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND 1AS-BUILW WN IS DSCD 2 THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL on OF TELE crisnato WHIMS AT LOCATIONT OF NM WON CPOSSEMS TO PHESIVINT G " EiNSPOE MOM wfHtIMR OR NM CONFLICTS EXIST LOCATIONS OF SOD AMES AS SIMMT OK 105(THFS HALL mate Marne min LOCATE 0 I-BOH332-1144 AND IAN pailozz i Al. ,, OHIM ) RRTO FUNS ARE 0/5ED MON HE UNATRIFIED PUBLIC oircwwai0,9 ARO HE SUBJECT TO CONSULTINC Rs.r CONFLICTS SHOULD IIW TO MEsauE ATL F OB[NS PPM TO saw_ man PROCEEDING YAHRHENM ENTATNE. 0 a Consmuc om AND sARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS THE-OWNERS22), "" `li - - � \ � jNI - ! , Q. r\ ftt10 HTTT ,d,„_,, 1'4 11, -,i - c l �I ;' IIT\ 1 111 II -it tI IP a ,t \ _= o ri,1 'p "'I I T,-,--.- 11 1,1 II I I � — 6 32. ._il I I 'r a ` -. CD I I� •1111'11 I !'Il !(, 1 1 1 r III r k i. 1 'I' ��I L } _ll~ 11 LI � \. .. /z \ } \G it Ili 11 Li 11 I cu ii I1 H l\ }.\- �'V C 1 V , 0 j E�r� II1 Z II 1 ...... r,...r. ,d, 1El , rl '' I 11 r L I c �.tx, l 1 �1 1 Lor LL 11 li 1 Hi' 1 pa 11 11 Iii II 1 p i '' v ®_ I fq'rL 11 1 1__ TIL �., 11-- 1-1 II 1 - ,-I '1� I'�:C ;;--- T� y`1 �' , I 11 - I:, h-� b IT-TT , ,O I --- — - t, II h,1 I IT f I r - eJ III 1r'i 1 I; '1 11 1 ' z;- \ pm Air r Z �`"A4°ttl IN; 11 / I I i ; r I ;:,---1 II 11 I, 1 r II 6 - II 'U\','`T"1 ii i—I111 -�!1i 11 I. I 1 1 -i, ,� -d id ;,1 I - f 114-J I ,L_ L k"--Qi �Li 1 r H- }-- a Ir—'' -"I I- it t 16-' �Ict.L�.l !NO I,� 11 II it I, 1 1 ! i. • -- --_`—�. . ___ -- - — --- --- G _ 1 -- — II/, 1'32 - 'I - I I - -_ ITLpti; 1 1 1 II ch.;&LTG.1 (zIU4,' _(b.l�,l ick& -�__ - - -� J11 1 _ i- __ 1 -' I --1,-_II; l! ;1—,I I� 1 �,,,,�. 1 IIT 4 -Ir . L -11--- --,1 - --{_-- :_ _-- F.-r -- - rr_=_-__l _ - - ,, _ — x,�.11 f _ I _ _ 1 _ it I 1 =t 1 - ' F —' I. VqAl�- —F'TEI 1-r `I --,i- T2 II _ F- --1 I 'LI I _-�1 -I , D - -- , :. �_ I` i I _ -' 1 1 l' {ff - - - I r LL _ I! _ 4t 553 1 tcr-:....�"44pLe 1--,;'. _ ~ _ _ f fl,.-Y tal °t, Il1p �- - 1 :_Jt r 1 - - Ir ,1 ✓3 �' _ '_ '�` , n F / L s r H 11 1/41 Ni ill kli I No 00 52/12 JD ole By ZGMT eta HPO I LAND USE SUBMITTAL aea°u" BCE m^Hooter sc.e 1914411. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH Designed GMT_ For TIME' 6324 P ±j t�2 KENr, wA 98032 L ! 1 EXISTING CONDMONS - tt (az5. 3251-62322 s> 3251-a7az FAX °^°°"°°°" ° COSTCO GASOLINE ADDITION she. 4:vr, _ rower a„� COSTCO WHOLESALE GAS STATION ADDITION 7855 SW DARTMOUTH TIGARD, OREGON. 97223 '0, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, a LM - 999 LAKE DRIVE 62a /r'/✓G EN4IEEP SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Dote°e/°2!u ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON.98027 COSTCO LOCATION Na 111 laaP ^ENIl.1124 e+y]"eernq`6i24 11 free C°le/T1re0 2:Uli I°Cy"N Sc°le 1”= 1 !DENNG sir: -�-- :m: 11,;17 ru - �I I� \ -N 31, 11 _ ,'1 17 \ o III rn \ J\. O L 1a 00 o0e00e0e0000c . _o � S A I 1 ti I - " ii' " lip 1Z — I i IIi - _ e 1 3 1mmeO _� r — . �1 1° - 11 11 p; 't' m p, I II II s c \s Sr I I E, r1 II I st ii n 0 ".-I- _- II-I HI -11 = r-i Ili--i` 11-1 - - 11 A N •v v�\ �o.` I I I I I d I3 r� At 71 E'4\ m g' I I I I N II I,1 'I II - \. . III _ 4, II Ii m III u! tv.io II '0' I .��\ I I � I_ Ir II s II nii! II v, I: II I� I ' Ii II c 11 I __ I -L-1, 1,-,11-,Ir -i',I -r-1- IIS I --,I-^! 1 r I II !i-_-I / I I[S_.,I&,1 LI:±4.,„116,_i; ,' '-L I I 111 I 11---SII I! I 11 1 LL 1 I - 1 , I i -,--r-$T-------r0-,n � —__ —_ _- _r� l,�'_-_I�i `t�lu ,,,-,$, II 'I II r - _ _ I 'I 11 1 I il I 1, �l c. S.I _.. _. . III 11 , _ u,c'zl 'I c�,rel (S. c4j-- / -,— -._ :E, L II III n I' I � � y . eNEW 50 DRIVEWAY e / __ _ I - 4 _ - -_I = = _ t a i I- ilta _ L = I"' — = , _ _ — ' I c 0 4 ,,k,......t - �' I - ,- - '- - - —_ ] - 7 , + _._ ,3 1 g1 I 4 ® ;� I 1 1, .I ��.. 1 R - 7 - fi �- - _ —r ' __ II I °� --- -- - . -- datilitiii : km 44 : - = - - -- _---- _- =4 I - 0 -- - Ill " - 111 oh O w P_ - — mgoPtANo iri t' R s7m Ro s o e' f 313 31, 53 PIP Pn NI 0e/01/111„D CM° App. I LAND uSE suEIMmAL Da, BCE Jap xumpv aJ p "°' �(' (®S 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH °"°""" For: Title: 6324 m1r t KENT, WA 98032 D .P JD „epP . .... . . •• SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN #- (425) 251-6222 checked cm_ I 2 spec, _Z. (425) zs-6782 FAX COSTCO WHOLESALE GAS STATION ADDffION COSTCO DARTMOUTH hGASOLINE ADDITION „, 0 c' CML ENGINEERING.LAND PUNNING, NA 999 LAKE DRIVE 7855 SW TIGARD, OREGON.97223 C3m, 6` <)-„„G ERG„,st SURVEYING.ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Dote oe/o¢/ ISSAOUAH, WASHINGTON.98027 COSTCO LOCATION NO.111 rpeP 00000p ISA'PP, P!lp A/—ol App DpIo'ip,pA 2 2110 le F AV .cow = 1 4201i/13 C-N ---- PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGEPLAN z N g W z zE � _ mo cs 1°-20' 0 0 90 30 60 0 Q ¢ O � I- s l5C1 O -- cL• c Iii " • — O \ ���'l 1 - -- - - _ _ - - - - - - \ _ I _ STORM DRAINAGE KEYNOTES = ' Q o Q 7 i - _- - - - - I ONEW Snag W 1 z Mu HIGH KEvsoxE WALL M RrRDG0122 70 g O U 0 _. WITH PEOEs cro - _ - _ _ - - - E iso °o co 1 - - -- - - . O LF z nos x Iz 0 LO - - - 1\\SSS _- aax NN ▪ _ in - - i - _ CO CO _ ' , - - -- _ • :® - So ® r ODA Min s t96 fit \ _• y e o - II GRADES MATCH EA ASPHALT \ Ff/ 1 �. w _ 1 /� \ - - Q n 1 - Lsss ▪ - .►- i'�- - H III ish 12_6_,97" �-111. / O SO I y -- - _ _ en P s - ' _ • t3 ? 1 ' hhrh - I - h 0 ( ,� NRS ` �� . W Q ME �k RocE L q 1, 1 ': - < a z © { II t I - i - `c'. L _ - III - - �3' 2 If - h 11 11 <▪14 ® WRN, LN {` wu3� 1 © meg / RIDGERNE 1:. ' �I _ iF 1 � MI � i it II� :'I J SII 3I 4: T: : y lull _ m � ,- '_ II �� t JrLf i_ 11111 fl I - I - 1 ih r • hl � � N : 11 :71-: 1 I1 ' I1IIIO T - - - - — _ _- - - D. - .1 IL _ 1 I— I 1 i 11 �11I , �� , 1 ,) Ip � I l - - r �. 1 J( � � - , _ t iq 11 0 - _ -- - - � - � +.. 4 i �" Id fi '7W >>i\ ZII • I!` I I`! II d I _ '— _- _ _ II -., _ -MATCH EY Lr J m 7sI �i t si� J I r 2 2o o ff, SAWC TME '� �. 1 I I o . .II GRADES A 11 III - - ti - -__ 11:11771 _ 11 L _ — L rI - bl I 1 w e I- - ---- - - I' 111 1 �1 ` I '� , - - ' 1 _ 1 1 IC � ,ill 111 - --- i 1 . - II � � II , �'u.'* .M _ � ' Ii!' " N — 1 dIr 11 j _ __II ' r - 1 - m N p }- r" 3 liat P R.D ®- I; H - - -"� NOTES • _ - 1i I ; r ' , � - i SEE ARCH. PUNS FOR ON-SITE SIGNAGE x PAVEMENT MARKINGS la VIII 11 ‘ 1 1 I.1 { - _I 1— FLY t - -� `Chh — - r -(/ I� J 2 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE 10 FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 0 I1 11 �Z, 1 j — ��- � 1 -_ ,C - _ r `� 3, CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN SERVICES OF A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR Q K1 1 1 I1 1i II � ! ' II = I � LH _ - STAKE HORIZONTAL CONTROL FOR ALL NEW IMPROVEMENTS STAKING E Ern �, J � 1 Y ' - 1 r : + Ii r CONTROL SHALL BE TAKEN FROM ELECTRONIC PUN LES PROVIDED BY BCE CTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL SITE. GRADING, AND UTILITY WORK WITH B� 4 SITE TCONTRACTOR TO ENSURE SMOOTH TRANSITION BETWEEN PROJECTS vore 4 c F V 0 N 30 co 1 NI 00 U Si ID 1 7 ., 1 11 II 11, p H H II II IIS I (1 11 111 II I,I 9 n I� 1 , �y � _Ill f 11 '� I1 FI• � . +� `9� Q �I 1 III \. Ill — _ .I' Y 1 HI I II Ii Hu H il 11 . pY n : ' -\ 11 11 e;a__ 1ifr1 II I'rji ylr'1 i y= § °I'' I1 }', Oy �'. , I' lit I In II _ --� V �I u II �I 'u '.I L -'111>7'1,'I''''1,11.‘ .1. wt- ',r , T h III 1, `I II I' '' 1 .;',l Y. - JlJ - r I L, fII — 1 jL r \ - , II II I- CO ryx .F � � Ill'' i � i _ ,. ♦ m I k^� � 'ice ` f l I - ill bi _-1 i _ Y� II III II II 11 i1 r { I �f :- I I 11 7,1 r , '�}�i yl _ . I � - ! 'II 1 o4I I I ��� 7, I, SII I II li 1 11 n r ' I II - -- 11P-62116,1 , I. I 1 I _ L l --' l1 'f cII ItI Triii I -pL-' i — 2ll ,tii - r1 - '_ i I IIIl _ 1, I .2 'kILII 11P-62116,1`.I : � LI i II I 1 I , I i h' I , 7/ I -g'� • - Y �, , 7 -�,_ _ ''31 f`I 7 Imo' Imo' r. _ - - fd . _ , II II 'I ! '� 'I �i- -;L . ISI c �'� I4't�I — -- - i — - -- - ` _ I , , _ -LPI s --_, Jl'- _ I, I' - L{ r - -'i iH -- FYi li !" Ir ° L� — '� _i.— II =_— J r , 7 + ' ++ I -- rl-- Tri ,i 1�- �r r ' ll c- 1T1 I :K4.1 , I _I - r - -- -1 _- r _ 1I e 1 g b 1 '' a rI bll b1_,0 ili Ir. e — _ w-�- �� amu""" t IT tltl + a -Lj' 1' l iriFiTMOtmi Ai -� _ A ":"7----------- - _ - L `- _ —TT. pE� AE - — — 67- SPi Pu gym `gym o sor7i'a O O N0 r CO OO Cohi go ki at fi rv° I MI',I JO 6y IMN. A9p LAND USE SUBMITTAL ary1S1O" BCE,°e Numberte Q.GF{q`tT 18215 72NN AVENUE SOUTH °"pn tl CML s�" For: I Titley m ` �y , • E PRELIMINARY OVERALL STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 6324 P IazsKENT) zwAs98032–szzz z 2 1-s]ez FAG °^°°^°°°°' TICOSTCO GASOLINE ADDITION g COSTCO WHOLESALE GAS STATION ADDITION 7855 SW DARTMOUTH GARD, OREGON.97223 Sheet sND , ch' CML ENGINEERING,LAND PUNNING, MGmw°„PC e. 999 LAKE DRIVEC5” 6 1, 6 ENG,e` SURVEYING.EM/IRONMENTAL SERVICES °e/12/13 ISSAOUAH,WASHINGTON.98027 COSTCO LOCATION NO.111 FIe1' ,L000.py4, I .:nn9fiIIV_mlya G°,e T'me[b 1LIJ IU!UIII ]..vl ' ]Ic6A,o ..e, -- - s in O=mil II I' 11 I I' I,, 11 U - _a A ti —6 I.,I''I: 11 l - IT _ (/ I'i ` I° - IT IL 11- 1 L II LI,,- - - _ �_.. - � ., 11 - - Hill ,- n _ • A C�,. - - -,1.J-,6: I „, i;,----0-i, 1 _, d , 1 i r, ...._ _:„. —0 IY ,:l IiII I i \ I: �� Ill I F it 'I I' s " c ! 1, 'I, ,III I11---;1 �i ! II j F ,m( Z a ,p lc y Ire � � e `'H \• D I -JL4 II 411 JI JI JI II I LI II LI I' I' .', I �A, \— it ILIIus. J o 0 II h `I V A y .^� 8 ! II - 1- III 2 11 II -1-. 1 -1 1.1„. i i - 11: °I II +0 a$ —__ �, t l 1 - 4 C_ r"✓ _ U L I!I v _ T , _ d G. Ai II 1 ' A Ni .yr ° . V�> Id A 2-2442 1N I Hf - - . '� I � 1. ' �';� - 4 ' � _I ' I 1, 11 I n1 'I I I I � I. 'I I �J, I i YJ F.IFI 'Y- ' 1 H_- 4 Iv ji4- 1 I I h I Z I �I _I I, It I, —1 I_._ I- III_ I -a. =-I{, 'I I4- i i' I-1- !&:IN,l' 1 41,.Li 6(.11 I 11 I, I; '1 II I� 11 I' li II I,; i -Ca; / ' , II r -- - _ __ 'I.r -I' -i'.'- f III.441 II`. r H II ri - -. 1 _ic4c>_I S�_1isci' 4 __ _ _ _ _ ---__- t � ,�1 =' i' � �I 1 I' i' li 1' ' �1 i1 }- ! 1 _li L2 ITr II-� - -II= -I -II n _ S A - II - „ - .221_ l' A, i i 3 . —_ 1— i i 4I , m - V - - 3 - L _ to 11 Y L — J — I I Ill- , II YI 4li 11 I ,- — I I _ I _ 1, 11 i,- _ p " 1 FI r .i imari _ - � � m� IIS 1 4 8 _ --y�+�_, r -'I R 4 mg {Ii, ,..I L. I 1 II I = j 1 IJ l o a l .� .' © k 1 U2 Q1.4 a nIpt 1C F AOUTIIROAD- 1111' 11 I. i7. _ O Az og m P o —I c_ O 0 000 O m A - s a] mo oo� z 12 P z? mN- 11 111 0 tn go 1141 Ag 9 R 9g - ' T or s NTEn o s" p Hi w N ll m 4 rv° 108/n0.2,/,131 B°mle3I 6Y3 I SAT I ABRCpc I °USE SUBMITTAL Ne"nion 6CE J°E Numpn e1�{ *P °. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH 42"uem_ For 6324 ar 02 KENT. WA 98032 uo.n m.oc. PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN y (425) 251-6222 z azs) 251-8782 Fnx °^•_` VAT_ COSTCO GASOLINE ADDMON O pv°5mnne °ea,eml COSTCO WHOLESALE GAS STATION ADDITION ��e CIVIL ENGINFEFING.UND PLANNING. Np 999 LAKE DRIVE 7855 SW DARTMOUTH TIGARD, OREGON. 97223 C6`-, 6 (T`NG EN 3„,41'-' SURVEYING.ENNRONMENTAL SERVICES We 08/02/I1 ISSAOUAH,WASHINGTON.98027 COSTCO LOCATION N0.141 FJe P�C^:OO:fi3IJ cn9 neer1_Al A 3:9-u1:rv9 U°Le'TISA 9, """'" YCIJ 1030+II S.m1... = I' ILEfllll: 4el AREA CALCULATIONS N TOTAL SITE MEA 647,301 S.F. PARKING LOT AREA 377.873 S.F. N TOTAL CANOPY AREA OF PRESERVED TREES 21,599 S.F.(DICWDES PROPOSED AND TOTAL QUALIFTING EXISTING TREE CANOPY AREA 160.315 S.F. SEE SHEETS L-1 AND L-4 COSTING GDGREATER CALJPER):TREE CANOPY INCENTIVE(2X) 21,599 S.F.(ECLUDEES PROPED OSED AND IXCWDES TREES TO BE REMOVED) REMOVED TREES) TOTAL QUALIFYING MATURE TREE CANOPY AREA: 180.315 S.F. Z TOTAL CANOPY AREA NEWLY PLANTED TREES 266,126 S.F.(EXCLUDES PROPOSED AND (COSTING TREES LESS THAN 6'C4l1PER): REMOVED TREES) X CANOPY COVER: 42.42 0 (EXCLUDES PROPOSED TREES) w Z MINIMUM X CANOPY COVER: 30.00 0 c Z TOTAL QUALJFYING CANOPY AREA COVRAGE 309,324 S.F.(EXCLUDES PROPOSED AND 0-0 0 `1— c S o REMOVED TREES) 's >" 0 0 0 %CANOPY COVER: 47.78 0 (IXCWDES PROPOSED AND \ MINIMUM X CANOPY COVER: 33.00 X REMOVED TREES) te _ 0.. 0 Z 47.78%IS GRADER THAN THE MINIMUM OF 33%TOTAL QUALIFYING MATURE CANOPY FOR THE SITE, THEREFORE CITY REQUIREMENTS IS MET. \ 0 < Z 42.42%IS GRADER THAN THE MINIMUM OF 30%TOTAL QUALIFYING MATURE CANOPY FOR THE PARKING LOT, THEREFORE CITY REQUIREMENTS IS MET. w 1O— TOTAL SITE AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE FROM MULVANNY/G2 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN,DATED 6/1994. SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT Q Z F EXISTING TREE INFORMATION IS BASED ON ARBORIST SURVEY REPORT BY GRANT HAMILTON CERTIFIED ARBORIST WE-2326,DATED 07/01/2013. PER BOOK 770, PAGE 759 E s U J F Q EXISTING TREE LEGEND W zj ✓�,i�•f" = E 6 00 0 %� � __ / QUALIFYING PARKING LOT MATURE CANOPY COVER _- - !L OPEN SOIL VOLUME \ -maim `�` \.:. 0 0 //// ® • / r • #247 RZ 0 !_ /247A �l ,,.. ''..:.'13„. \ 8 8 / INDMDUAL TREE MATURE CANOPY OUIUNE N/A COVERED SOIL VOWME st�� 249 # 1•. ���� 0 �•/ _ . —Q�_� �=.283 of/' ;`�w` 7 �d$a �' W v {�� I--- EXISTING TREE NUMBER FROM ARBORIST REPORT INDICATES EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED FOR j,..„,..:6, .1/291 11�i iTyT�--� -� ��y'� 0- IlikA�\� \ N $ • FOR TEES LESS THAN 6'CAIJPER(SEE SHEET x PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ,�$ - -I I:- F.1 r y. I'- �•�y, `t'.I L-6 rT�HRU a FOR EXISTING TREE CANOPY �sR_ l 1.1i1 j'� G > �°^�s ..�)�4\� [�TABLE) , �19lei _� 1- -= -1 I- L L�.t �[;'a' -`Il�,iy! A�� ! r t I--'1._. EXISTING TREE NUMBER FORM ARBORIST REPORT T,v. -„- t _-1 1 1 1 sr a 1 �- � `` 4 - -FOR TREES 6'AND GRATER CALIPER(SEE I -1 I r- 1C ,¢� 1 - �, `SHEET L-6 THRU 8 EXISTING TREE CANOPY {•w• _ 'n _ -�, iy- 1 11 �INDICATES EXISTING TREEC4N0• �y, [ , - J20t:____. O _ �i � P' #242 --T7 +F�tQ-I 1,�.. I + I.TABLE) TO SCALE PER ARBORIST ' .III J=_:„ INDICATES LIMO OF PARKING LOT MEA REPORT / .-�4 \\ �, #28 $2438 1PAF(KING LOi gg , ___ Ef84o�U;#� #235 /265 y}�!1266 •SEEEXISTING TREE PROTECTION FENCING / \ I WSEE SHEET L-6 FOR DETNL '/ Y(1 rm ���jr, I b\ "1 n -. #z73 #2�2 \\. \ N _ c� •a�a a - 1 #z7o #269 1 266 co 5 Go ,/ ( _ 1I24r, .e ,,' N - -_ HMO= • - ,.� -� b W ET a) ,]\V” •"' +q® ,_.:;___...:,1...r..,1_,":., /A P". fIlI' _ -- / I \biifil \e�\ • 1• W �O `,�22, �� #17m�► V ��#2 2 ,•,9,1 J2 1 1 ���� • Q Q '''G © ° I O 283 ■I: OL IJ I�/� ����1 \\ #172 a ,�', s¢slcn-e rca # ♦ 1 / I Q J l • 0 • 3311 ',s '►,+ `e b` #171 _ _� na r "► oD,l� _L��� �I.^1� ��' S / 1 L 0 ., 104.7.,,r., 4000,00\\„) �� _: P. /° ,:, i GASOLINE I , ► co Q V -► u las,..'.4.0 co ;i ns' '---__10 #+�6 ADDITION �,k#,3 AI 1 O \, co \ i6 I # _ I" #•1 l01' 1 :26s 1 0 -. I#175 I I - 9 - rG•.� TI 1 �,,.I. '� 1 ;2so' 1 _ Tit \\ #�s7• (�f /�' �J II 6 IH35 ,I Al _ - - �e�� _ '� #158 ''•oar #176 , l sn \\ \ J 1IILa —,x'. 1'.'i0'-�' „ii1,*,,, #,"`\ '� �° ,j.• D as O O I u u rL:a •WTI �,= iPO ia► v,. ?/ , \\ • �. II .I.., 29 — II _I. , 1294 1295 1 I 1 D 16 30 60 - 1 77--00,10),--,:,,, \` A' • I!Ir4 I H I I . -� #297 '#zs6J 3 .•I �E�\ f�Fa 3 • / ,✓ .\O\ \ #155 I I #158 I #169 #m i'�O•,. 11 427' LI, 42 I #42s ..� '..- ;:` •,/ • 6 � • 92 - II -. rte ♦ '. ° 1� P1.4-7-1-41-.Is' 3 / >i,_i I,�1 =1- I\.` #291�M�: I _ i • �' \ #1sa _I '_. YT <�e �J _ - �� .I I n .•Rr aNI c • • '�°� �_ �I q wl, I f I ` s 3, 're r �='j *' Z 1D, /i4 k, v_,y �i 'x`C�",�� II 11 #178 N- 4sa L 1 J I j �I ve�61 ► dUP #303 /�,. �1�#3001 a S�,/2•/}-/3G,t,'s 1 /zot �I �� X�: ��„Fe,, �/ I 4pF AR �F' \` I(;152 I 159 ��7:# I (VAUD ONLY WITH SIGNATURE) /tee„* „ _,-11171110 i 1 #u3 1 #tse #aza r, .I I i .•� MJ #taz.F I �` -I '� -,-. 121 =tin • ` 19 r y1 ' _ '71 I z 1. ii4 112& I1..,_1-I I L ,�'a o_..,,,,''� t,„ II #,80 "�Iy IH16 �•► '�i: d ,x¢mmmlaa x _ '' \ II# • _ _ II II ` � 17— / L i'iiiT�#31�fe =I, Q• ,vow mcv. -'0 - 144 1151 _ #423 i U'>4`, \>xE �b �. • ax $ 1zs i., _11._•-' a II • I#•so II ;ts7 / /� _ l.P$1' ; o o # =)__Pk▪ ,.�/Af J • • 7 • • M Y •! ) #409 / / `J/ � I.� �I�313j o o 8 J , 9 1�f:r� #tas p,au II �N� �/ l f ` / �I�II D zi71 • LI • h _ Piti15 _or lr / / (�+ . I, 'T Ti \ II I II r #192 _ : — ''\ / 1 / •C1KED\ iiCir' g \ II#745 I 1,1: zW- / I5, Ota; , �� 9, �/#315/I / nll AA#14 _ wW _ #183 / / j p zi i—Ww - -� - / / !I�� c�Z— — — II �I — —W— 1� ;3t , N• —iTt, — IM• ll i/ t4/ • ZIn v n _ ,,,_ 3#184 1 (W4_ 1- = . _ _ I•opA,ll lk 163 h_ • c/116I 38I #39 • • ;#162 # L l i s• •� r7#1�` � 'LIMBOF PMKIG LOT MEA ./_ 1107 d.S` A I I o o e e e `+e 1 1 - - • • ', #395 ` � / :� V 0'01'54410 , • s 1 I \ 'kw,1101 I , f 1 I� �•• l t� • I 39 '�I — Al .97 I —_ • #327/ 1 g,- ,, ..,-,- - -L,,.: I Cd:PSTCO 1 '#too .v' _. -._ �OIE I # - j--' I / E a..LI • m d' I - o n I h1 0V I + N r • �'��, 39k r i1= LI- ra 1 /131 ;135 1136 1137 I 9F# #330 14._ \ I m L n _4'- : - - MATCHUNE SEE SHEET L-2 �� _ I =mix > ., = :L �,. -! , 0 II'' ' - Idlll ! Ill I,i/'' t 1,:,..11,.-. .r7 Ip 11 I . • I.I it-11^1 -I ITI -,.L. I :I kni (Jli. II(• 'tel Il(' ",a1al .\ _f_ I L r _ -�I L -T Ci ''1,. l�Yie}1- - _ I --L--I- J �- II D' II. r ,r116.74,-:,it �� I, II II l II i q Ild I 1-LI %p ;� Ia� '.LII IL r,l LI I. `iii I lid+' v �. lG•i' ,---- T ) 1_ - { m_,I I' I � r C 1' �I, j.-,. 1•T__I, - i:J1tr,/ta `onda I�_'il I I III I_� 1, �,,.!:•,;._!.0.., L I' rIOW*'( 1 D -I,, - 1- yJ� r.-L J,1 It + ` 1 111I ,y / 0,11 I I•_ I L-I r, I*iT ''C' 1' I , ' tl 11- ;�. 1I t 6 ••`IO I-11111r- IL r ITwo/( OMIT OF PARKING LOT -LF al... r' ;10IT -r:;--, 1 v P Y L;,y _I -1 J e LIMIT• 7-EKING l- w wLTMIT�PWtK11dC YEW AREA W W W w- _ / l- "!;�I(e I♦ I._ -- "��7.� �r - -- -���- -- - - 1- _ -w OF PARIMO-LOT.-ABEA_-w- - - - N p-_ I f / I �Te6fF -w- -w 1 / I TI I\I W Y �!- ..I / 1 a� l 1_ , ( \\ •.-.,T_i_7i.1`_.• r 5 ,1 IiIL�I ILI. 1_ I'r� it �7r HI '• .. _co - rrl '' Ii� � _rj rte. lI-I -, `I , I i- I'= -Irl-I_-!. 1- ;� J -,-I ,-I- L_ l l-_I�--JI 1111,111 C-�1„ , i:pp1` II 1�11-1:i. li_ 1T1' � -I• 1_11,-.;.111 IIt ��yyL' /. "'---,, r''11-1,N: lr-J I- I r,T 1-,1',7,.j.1 ' ' ~ A 18 `}PLj';4{:iTir, j,r"I^il iTl+l �' I- -T-I.rJ- -I I- "I L ,-2,--,,,i—,_,- T7, _y_ �{' K�irL.. °h 11a I --T.-1.-•I1 1 - I i.1_ 1_,-? 11 , 111 11LH--i 1 1 -. J.I,7 .I--1--1111[1 1 II' LIMIT OF PARKING LOT AREA I I-,-1T--y 1 --1 1 Jm LI I II11 1 1 � '! q ..-.11.7,..v:.,,,..,..11.1 '� ,LIr �1 ,-,11,' t141i4- 1 r ..1- -11-1-1-J.-I, ' '�._ I� 1 C1E-I 1.=.•1'1,1-7 -i C7L.I p IJIILL-1f:.1 II I i.r•{,711,•,, -$- :-.1-- - =1---I -1---., .I-T-1-T-1-1 'G ;.`I.1�11 \ LFit ',1 1._n,"-r�i-1_i,1I 1,-1 IJ': \ ".d 11,=1.4h 11:1-..-1rh_ �L--I-moi'- .-I ''1+; \1 _I ,"TI -16i!'IIa \ _ J I 1 ,.II b' \ - . �t 1 , .. . L. I Y I lc,TI I,)II I !Ci. �` 41, .ASF KI I li AREA '. o e e e e e -'r 7� I U I I -Ill- 1 I_ir.LI T t,1. I/I I e. •,:J I L r 1 1 7 IIII \ „.... .______., :•.''..: - ..., i -1I I-I I ._-f \ LIMIT OF PARKING T AREA '.k1 -I II LTr!11 TII { T,1 Ii i I\ —w— — — —w— — — —w— _ r L*L71I 7 1�1,hI_I �I11 II, — —W— — — —w— _ _ —v • w w w _ T L ,-a e w C1 /7-w- `ILIII i1 j;I 11 1LJ 1i #1 ,per ?I'' /Q O. �I, [....inL , II -I .1 rift& �� '" -----; �► 7n I ... I fliii 1 • 1'-' T I III 1 111 w Bi' 1 II S I 1 F It I 4d 9 ,I, I, 1 1 SIa I/ ,4211.._....1.4?? C y I 1 I I? 1 1- 11- 1 4-'11:I I I� �,.1.1‘.'1`41,,•a... .-1;1_ . h /11 ,o jfF _ 747 I �-,✓_L,L II I :12-1''''-'. -)..1.-i'7..'1 ,0-1,1 1=;I l�6 1,1,_. I_I it� 1.:= 'o • ' • • • -,. '��L 1, T: ;,, 1'711 dl' 1 , ' •l '• • .� I_�IJ PIla1 -1 III1-;=.I.!---I I - 15” - .1 1,J T T, 1I 7..---11-... 111 11 '-±-,-_1•,--..--.-. 1111 11, '�m , 11,. ' �� 4 ,I- I TII I _II I r 1 1 I ,_1 ! r. es I I' I ILI 11, J1r m r l In+J Pf. fL 111 71 11 ', t�/� w ,' ^'I �� 't -I 1 11 , , TI h I. Io O -.1--•6 1 I 1 11 -- y - ''�}}q,��,,���`,,� L�' I. ,1rLI'I ` 11= �1�1:.; �' va7' i l L �Ii ,L1A _ il�� .w �i '- I1 111` i6� .;IiJ . ` I N .I1 sarWI if ' 1pIA��`;] _ 11. 1 lo I I •� ' �rTl-lei (41.,.-.'","Iii? l• , i?:t- m Ib __; 1 11. {. V. B ...:,_0,., ,., T w, 0 1J I ^ �� r 1I \ z,.,..P.-,.., a : 1. 1 11 111 731W 0ii _ — oWm n .Zm1 10/1 0 /'Xk Al A+Pn -_ D • / "-- - /,%./ OAm / di / I _.2Tn '''V' m �D y / 1 [ / / ' '.. . 2 12/11/13 AMS CMT JO PER CITY COMMENTS 1 11/11/13 AMS CMT JG PER DET RECOMMENDATION LETTER,DATED 10/20/13 No. Dote By I Ckd. Appr. Revision Job Number Scale: c. Q•G11A(/t� 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH De81gned o r)5� p For Title: 6324 P � / t� KENT, WA 98032 Mann Horizontal = a�_zv Fc, COSTCO WHOLESALE EXISTING TREE / CANOPY PLAN m Z (425)251-8782 "'T r A s a 999 LAKE DRIVE COSTCO GASOLINE ADDITION e` �'� Checked.JE_ 1'=30'-0'g ` U. Sheet 21 (425)251-8782 FAX v N j = z / Approved_Ey_ Vertical `- L'oz ISSAOUAH, WA 98027 7855 SW DARTMOUTH TIGARD, OREGON.97223 i� dp 0' CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, Yn2 L2 m 11 (r/1 ENG+N`�� SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Dote 03/10/11 N/A p /reCT . O COSTCO LOCATION NO.111 FlIe:P:\06000e\6324\engineering\6324-L1-0.dwg Dote/Time:12/11/2013 2:46 PM Scale:1:1 AS0DEL Xref:---- AREA CALCULATIONS N TOTAL SITE AREA 647,301 S.F. PARKING LOT AREA: 377.873 S.F. Z TOTAL CANOPY AREA OF PRESERVED TREES 21,599 S.F.(EXCLUDES PROPOSED AND TOTAL QUALIFYING EXISTING TREE CANOPY AREA 160,315 S.F. (SEE SHEETS L-1 AND L-4 Q (8'AND GREATER CALIPER): REMOVED TREES) (EXCLUDES TREES TO BE REMOVED) J EXISTING TREE CANOPY INCENTIVE(2X) 21,599 S.F.(EXCLUDES PROPOSES AND Z REMOVED TREES) TOTAL QUALIFYING MATURE TREE CANOPY AREA 160,315 S.F. O TOTAL CANOPY AREA NEWLY PLANTED TREES 266,126 S.F.(EXCLUDES PROPOSED AND (EXISTING TREES LESS THAN 6'CALIPER): REMOVED TREES) %CANOPY COVER: 42.42 X (EXCLUDES PROPOSED TREES) o O O W r MINIMUM%CANOPY COVER: 30.00% Z r TOTAL QUALIFYING CANOPY AREA COVRAGE 309,324 S.F.(EXCLUDESXCTREES) AND o Cr Q %CANOPY COVER: 47.78 X (EXCLUDES PROPOSED AND \ o1 V 0 z MINIMUM X CANOPY COVER: 33.00% REMOVED TREES) \ ! CC Z 47.76%IS GRADER THAN THE MINIMUM OF 33%TOTAL QUAUFYING MATURE CANOPY FOR THE SITE, THEREFORE CRY REQUIREMENTS IS MET. W w Q 0 42.42%IS GRADER THAN THE MINIMUM OF 30%TOTAL QUALIFYING MATURE CANOPY FOR THE PARKING LOT, THEREFORE COY REQUIREMENTS IS MET. F CC Z ♦.c SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT _ V TOTAL SITE AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE FROM MULVANNY/G2 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN,DATED 6/1994. PER BOOK 770, PAGE 759 E# 1- J p ,` EXISTING TREE INFORMATION IS BASED ON ARBORIST SURVEY REPORT BY GRANT HAMILTON CERTIFIED ARBORIST WE-2326,DATED 07/01/2013. 0 EXISTING TREE LEGEND • - \ L5 ca O O O O QUALIFYING PARKING LOT MATURE CANOPY COVER = IE I- OPEN SOIL VOLUME (Met , • O ";,,/,,, ®�l, s r 2 1217 124M / \, $ ~ Q 0 ::\ p\0'• x U 1 INDMDUAL TREE MATURE CANOPY OUTUNE N/A COVERED SOIL VOLUME ��7►..�� '7'f---) .-- r\ 24f1 �/ / Y_ __ \ — 252 1253 0 __^--` 263: �263A in WIPP* Z (1?-1 i. . `y'°I i' 'may _.1.-1-......,-,L„___ __� �'.� ��� O O•j• �O?•\\ - __ FOR TIES LESS TWIN 6'CALIPER(SEE SHEET PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS % moi. -'1 -.-� �'4! - I� /- EXISTING TREE NUMBER FROM ARBORIST REPORT INDICATES EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED FOR co IIS _ _ 'S e�se�� y co _ 1 8237 _ T+- -7-'7-4 3_I v4�° \�� \ -C W L-6 THRU 8 FOR EXISTING TREE CANOPY - �I� T 1 _11 -. �.'�2 '� -- A ^� °' z ~W e 1 1 I� t° g� �� N 1___ FOR ES 6 AND GRATER CALIPERS(SEE . .r ` ,r /r _. _� II I iI 4 - r - 243, ea.,..2 f �f v�i7 1 12w - _,,1 � .4. d TAB \ SHEET L-6 THRU 8 EXISTING TREE CANOPY INDICATES EXISTING TREE I %: A ��%'X242 124 r -(V3 9f`'� 73. k7. _ �I V� \ 0 TABU] TO SCALE PER ARBORIST ,/ / /// • "2348 82438 LIMIT SOF - 7 L_.5;471777, -- 284 REPORT J�/ r 1 �i'" ' 4 +�t� . PARKING L0T AREA - -..-__ ._ ���__ \ INDICATES UHF OF PARKING LOT AREA ,r.1 1'; -1 f 'n,• �4 V SJR r a �,��.p��y - 9'\ 12._.._ - X266 A • EXISTING TREE PROTECTION FENCING j a \ pr0 ///' ;/ // / /, �,+ 5 \ 6 N. SEE SHEET LE FOR DETAIL - \ rtw -i11-r• - %/// �'� I W I % 1�/.- \ sg sl.r�-a ca, i - i ` � \ JQ N • 1, L • %i ocna f/ � � z/r. //u///v 4.1"/A,;,‘"'',"/''If W O CO > VII J e -11� I.1 #, 11' y�y'/ ' \ co `IIIIIIIIIImn a' .y.4iir//lfi.;E///LKrati4// i3Y.F r -,-;,7--------,,.'*;--;! rqi \ W 0 < �a p' d{� y?d7 y� ,T �.it L .tom" - / .. Ae � f////1L.e$i/. 3 .:1 'J Q Q ��Gr� �A® • / ,,, ? �\ ,_, ELI ' 4 ,:' ' "l�/ ?„ � •//j,0/ e �P \ \ O W 1 . , 4 / ..- oar \ G��\G 00 I -�, 0// e�\ 7 od Pn3 , / do •rIRE MOTEL. p p �, 2 2 •e /eat _ 2 �A © - 6i 4.,";„. !y^�%/\/moi,' ` // / y/ - y i��//�!y y SF.�-a MR ��r_ I /283 .+:rl �j 1 \ 1"� O J /D 1” �' 11 � j/!Gi�.\ ,,,,,/,,A1 ,L / r / + %F _ - '•�.��� _ IC 'Till \ If t•/ •� y,',, �) GASOLINE tt 8�i 'y'\� /J / � / , % , / e 8436 ADDMON p 828.9-44:113 4.eP , • s� \ / j''2," ' "%i io r%i-2, I I p_ - Zea 1 N t ' /// / // j�jG,' I� 4351 _- — , �/ mLi 1�ihi1 ./a4" J�i/°0 '� � ; ri/// /"%,. /iII - -_ : _`sn -� I i.,.,I. � I290 IA ,I �I { y \ / y /�j (/�. 1 13A a ..' ,� _ `+ ,r'r��� /,�y�'�'\ /J,/ ..„- 7,, 'r'''''.1"-i'''''''..-02f,,, , ,c i%'./I/�t c� U 6 18436 .fi'all I �.s -- - .:,/f�-�P'- ,' , � ^'6 "'\\ / i;. /"r%� �� 'OiE� , 7X/ %., -�1(1(-)- -podia' sn •J-- - «. � i _ -1=30'-0p / _Fd� � , ' ` `!%�' YG� /j j., �L p ,. #29447.9279.5:11-41;4:1-_,' PEG �s- it -I - - ;- \ i .. �.,,„ ,: 0 15 30 60 1 %`./i 4Y'9N�%//VA — 14,7 -29 i_ 295 ,iT �, \ E 15 3inzma0.'4\"J 'a �..:z.. �S}97 11 ism 1 %`; w.�\ / �j� //,eiw. F N;i I I I I I I �•� 297 ��s �,i1)296 3 -G S I '%%# j. _ , jj/ '� :/ ,;" ,� 4/00,,,,r, �5�u/� / T I I - az7 4z¢ Sazs :),LiT Saw, 8 �1I • sat •298 wriffAcl I'Si�I c >i / � � �� ¢r 3" ter :/ Q L: I .e._+ef'' �� 1 �' 4 8?. Oi•L 1'i4 I v A�uy'`ONI c~I /ice,�4_. yf///\ ,�fS' / �.,.,.i • � 1%"T 'R�'. �'// �L'•� �I �' I . � r�..%a°" �i if J�//i %/ /;O//ice` o�/cy Y •� 429lII� I - tv04. yO 1 ;t/la ��u //A"" \\�// /�i` , �!1//�/// I J 1?. ��► 8303 ' fii; �)8300 3lS'c �j Viz-(9 a �} \'\ f %3% A6i���/ _-ASIq'' a/ �' a�. v�/:, I IPF AR T _ a x201 0 :Gs:YIli y , , �„ r��1111)8 - - ,�/!/�. %l// % /� . / �� Nn� I (VALID ONLY wITH SIGNATURE) Ji_. -r , ,,,,„...'N i':'/. IG%A/ iNr i//Hi./ri/�, / £ % J/ i�7 !°/ 1L { / %' /r .•/�*47 .,.�a .��� / /" / .,,.P.7, ,/'/oi 1 ,/ 1 r. , / Y/,.,q'r/' I 6 •� _ Q •1 e Z y yTr 1J(r.,-.d6% / r /.CJ l r ,moi f%�?�''j/j '�f .v 4//".4 ' '/�,,./4 O 0/ �7,'/h�/ ,G i+ 4' �.' ,?Wri,•„i% .15'il- - ,.;;//1*,41 /',: i „tiro i///%- %' ,,.r. /:?' %/i S„ y /E % / i /.�i fi, ,>�° "'y:'// , \ :''� ( I 305 1L/ G�/ / / i,, // iY/// f% L . Sia 8ir- - �.� ''s/�• , �� it - /� � % j 1�:,iii'..,i 6. /,� / /4 , ys•7/ _ r �i A I-_ -J �'' '�/%>` /ii / T_4`C`d iLr� ' / "' . ice /'� f/ 4p//////,/ 5 A i r.. AI,,-,i. - 4" E' ►128A �1 _119 1 ie_v1 i Ago g i 4. Q / p . s . sf'',/��///GL6, /- Via► /ash tit 1 u° 0 .. _ h"a� y �.; / " ' / T�- „` Tg ,p¢rnala,ax `I 77 � 'i - %` / �///% /�i.,: ii:.w. 1 6' I 1/ fJ sj I /, •> / '„� / p 8`r i r '� auOLIM.- ' l o / w r//.11aGS'�°i/b "" , / %�'/N/ , ':"/ ^'`//• ,L FON Epp W. -� /its '1 i L-1,47-,......,±':1-4- ?y9•� �'14°:0;,,,,,i‘6'dG �N J„ �!%;g.... '�,G,'i,/y,,7„0 ,�J�/Vi ii %;i'._/" i/ .,.iaa,� / / j � ' +C��r !!'Ia " u Y oI. �,, -T-�it�/ �f/ / l ��/�:, / 5 ' 4 . , //✓�//%� % � .� �! /�/ 3/ a'ys i�.a � 73 I o oi/v-�`�yi/i !!/// i/ uu • :/ � ;ny;- - - ,,. ems/ _ `�r��� r & ;, s�/ .%i Iw €/' se :41 r / r/- $c° '�'ve, Ilp`�/ / > 8 �`f'af&3%//moi %/;%, 59Gi//%/�' � 'y/��s, ' 4�;!/1' '%/�,,-/J��,i,%y/ill• i��:,.41s;'� ,�,8 � / N g _ /�� L' ,. %/ % .J //��7iiE� �' "' I "" f% //dam 't�//G�l 5, ��� _ J '. / 41 W x . n ffit �p /�:: ,4'.,!'% i 3:. �f,�. ///rei,,. %' �: ,�% ,".$ / / /S'oiiv : 414i/ r�9// a--' 3 ` ¢ a1' KEYSTO r fir" .... r / �'/ 'i it , 6'// p p wy�'`:�/�///"` i; /i , re/�//'„ %/,. <%%1f%��, /�, 'i 0 ��'�S; - Ill -''r!' / 1',I eVWALL !ISO .� y�e .. �/,�/L,i., 11� �v / .f "� / /315 z ,a.•r,..,,,,, ,.i/� � � / f� _ M N N r 1' `, .//, i' % .„:„.1„,/..,;(4,1/P..0.12?..; :'; U/ /C4J///; / �j y I : %%�' � �// y 'pati% y I 'o N po & St1t Of :,d ,I�..i/l�� i,r/ �7n////'!y ��// / /.�, %i? a �/ / / 1 .i,,,. "I 1 ,21 ........_0;117:11 �y a ����/ ��gff %�p�y�/: \\fir '� yj s� p<N I� ?S 110 = Y' � /y// j I— //� ?;1.- _. i — — WAY/3j"/ A /" ' O ;� I 11111P ri �U J c ii m O _\ ffi V .VIII III ( O F /,_111-1 1I I_ r ' �` -\I'-I '^*I _ .iit, p O 4S a ,y. i 'a'J _ 9 L_I 1:I 1' 1.•''7,--P---- 1— _L.—wr 1 m ,.. 1—T 1 1,11 Ills 1- .I.�I L I'"' I_I�I - I\1 1 4!} 7""'-I I l _ r I I I I r�/ int.„1, v .,p '�1.1 .4-'1.7;1 1 --".-1 -." __ I. -1 1 I ` �g� wlr'. is. , 11.7-1 r f 1.1-I I I L. -I:1 ��r 11y-40 I �. �Y �I o_I_ r 'r. l�r]4 i�1�0f�ill i f '� 1 i. } �I{, isl 1 .I �I l� I I:!`1 Q 1 1.. 11....:::' :,;A,e• : �'��.� �,.. - _�lY �7,510- l- - -Y - , 1 W 7 1''I i I_a �q I ` \ A'S: .. v\ . , 7 f 1 �i Ir-1 1'n7II aj d. -'S _ i ► Oa. i;." qi I II l4't ' � ' \\ \.... P'ARKI \ & I " r I:,_ Ia .� 11-1 1 r —w— — -WOR7'DF PAtKING AREI\�\\ �\ r="'KING ///' 1.1so,.'-11 a \,mss - - - yv•., 7 l 1 I \�\\`, 1 fel- ---_--. OF PARNING-LOT-AREA_—w- - - -w - 1 Yh)6ff —w— I'--1I-1 n l'; 1 -rrr- / W7-,I1 1I_�I 4 -_I •e•- 1711-1.1 '1 sf' 1 I II' • 6 I T' I r* - I J. e •i--Ii L;:1_\I_ _., Z • 11=1 . `� t i Vii- I[4,76;11,:-•,,-/„./. \`\ \ ..111 !1 1 �I I Q r I , \\a� I ,1--;1I-: 111 - ll IL,IAg' �� 21 I III 11� L 1IIII,X11 ,l e 'q o `1 1I.-'I-,_I I 1,_,r;i t,,-1 1_Id .. li' ��J I L'_ 1 r I I I 1 *II 1 III 11-1 I l tiT` pAV Y - .. . _1.141l1 11.11I1-1 17.IT:CiL-1 , , j-l11IJr `- -=11--IL ,-1_ `iz, FI , I 111¶_1 � �. aLl - I I- 1 11IL�pi-_-.1,. --,,,A,-. . ' In, -lTllFIC -,-*-;7,-!,,_---.4. TI p IIx J'iI lI1 I 1 ;,� �Y . ,i ? 0 III 1 N �V Jill LI 1111 I I 11 I 1111 8-,y//,, - - ,, \;, ... - . _.______ 7, /-- /// - + ^'_— is //__; ` \ ` *\ •. o ® oma ;T\ i II 11 7 \ • ,4 .9). V\ � / o \ ... : e1[1S1 /j ♦ o / T z, , , \ I / : ,- ___ ¢_I .-1:: ii H=:---. 4-_ _ ____--- ------- _ --_.'.\ V> \\\ \: •‘ ] ,i / N 1 \ . . \ / ... • II � I %j.,, 1 '- /� G 11 II III (1 � G G 111111 .1c7 ) e \ 1,1 ,:: iC 1i 11 II II II II 11 11 c: T ''ill - II II . . cc'`IL 1111 f( :10— II LI II 7. 11 11 III U . . fI II `i :� El c?...:_., II II II �a ilea \ S '.�. ,i �fir .- - � ` \ 7- 471\\\ \ ` liv \. ' + • i a 'II •. . II S_ I.,I + • TT • —IT co Lio mil \m\ m, II itII . II it N \• 'iILs • �r' (1 M •— all ) /II ^� `,,,\R: r o e + d o + d . °II \ ...---- ------------------------ �': \ice; Q\ \Cyd. ,,\ II ( \ \ I ori o \ \ � ,ems\ (( ` �"��,'\��E .t�I k. - , :;%•:;;:yot , \ \ \ \ \ �' DARTSdO�JTH ROAD / ,x \ \� \-- .:7,, `\> 04, \�\lA<ik041 i %• vt �t .\°1 \..„ fie i �\��\ \@� \`\�� +w "o `} ri °r iie "te �i a s I / ♦' �7 } -„ ilia I .. - 11111111111.* ---------— zil 04________! _ p 2 12/11/13 MIS CMT JO PER CITY COMMENTS 1 11/11/13 AMS CJO PER DET RECOMMENDATION LEITER DRIED 10/28/13 No.I Dote I By IMI Ckd. Appr. ReWalon Job Number q.— —S 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH Deelgned SMS- wale: O r,2 L • ,, ` Title: 6324 mP � �`t�Z KENT, WA 98032 Drawn ° No,;�„te, ,. a M_ i cT COSTCO WHOLESALE PROPOSED TREE / CANOPY PLAN �� (425)251—szzz § r 999 LAKE DRIVE COSTCO GASOLINE ADDITION e` Checked�L 1'=30'-0' N Sheet it (425)251-8782 FAX v N y "WIC Approved_...E_ vortical � : — L, , ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 7855 SW DARTMOUTH TIGARD, OREGON. 97223 0G Qe• SUR ENGINEERING,LANDMEN PLANNING,RV ```<0 COSTCO LOCATION NO.111 L5 11 `ING ENGIN*� SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Date 0/1o/it N/n ? /TF r m C '4 File of File:P:\06000s\6324\engineering\6324—L1-8.d.g Oate/Time:12/11/2013 2:46 PM Scale:l:l ASEIDEL %ref:---- i CO N 1 N EXISTING TREE CANOPY TABLE SEE THIS SHEET TO THE LEFT FOR CONTINUATION 0 I TREE S2IE 405145 PR55ERMON OPEN SOD. COVERED SOIL TOTAL 005540 INURE x AND MEA OVER IXWIFYING PRESERVATION TREE SPE 100010 N PRESERIAIIOH OPEN SOIL COVQLD SOIL TOW_ EKISTNG MANIE S AND APER OVER WAUFONG PRE,RNAPON TREE NO. SPE61E /1.611 RATING MING VOLUME 001441E SOL WL711E CANOPY I CANOPY PARKING L2 SRE CANOPY I TREE N0. SPECIE I 1/A� _RATING RUING J WWYE I VOLUME SOIL VOLLIME CANOPY CA40Pr PARKING LOT SIZE CANOPY 0F,5{fj0)_ • 1 O I A LW _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ 73. _.. _..' tirPVWETREE_ 9 c.. `•d.IiileA' 1.?W.Sr•6.:..I„ _i iIPJp S=.... A.OI''al 1Bx - 723 ar 46E7af .6 n 1 6 FRONS 041650,0/OREGON ASH 2' 3 3 OVER IWO cf.0 cf. 1,000 cf. 19.63 a. I 70650 6.f. NOT A PMKNG IDT TREE 70850 al. TES I 734 ANUS RUBRA/ 2•Y/S 3 3 OVER 1,000 cf. 0 cf.. il<J0 1 4827 et. 125664 a.f. 235 295 at 1256.64 al YES 1 AvY I C P56040 3 0419111/OREGON ASH IS 13 JNEA/SCARLET OAK I e 3 3 Cha IA00 cf.1 0 cf. 11.000 cf. 5017 cf. 7 650 cf. N00 A PARKING LOT TREE 706.50 6.f. m I W O 1,7„1 r I OYR 1,000 cs1 p a. 1,000 6.I. 19.63 a/• I 70650 a, NOT A PARKWG LOT TREE ]0150 at IFS I 74 OM=COW IN= 1 1000 cf. J 54 .f. 17667 f. 235 40 f 17863 ei. YES '- I E I FROINUS LAMM/OREGON ASH _... 35'W/f 3 3 I OVER 1,000 cf.1 0 cf. i 1,000 cf. I 502]at i 70050 6.L NOT A P31510 LOT TREE 70650 aL...YES I 78 ON M-15.NNE MARE. .. .1 Y Y/S 3 ,yOa0cn�1 1 i-`.:., r. ...1.„39„241., 4s,15, -I_ ._ .,s : . :< :: � p c II9E'��'�`,�� 1r. 1,030 al o [ 1 pop cf. 19.63 L 70630 a. N2 A mew Lm TREE ]1450 I YE T"'t _ - '�'_Y3Y�pn.a,.Y- a 12 I FRIONUS 04IWOUA/OREGON 4.SN • •'• 19.8': ..jl 3 13 OVER LAW c/.0 e. 1.500 el. 19.63 4e 706.60 4e NOT A P000045 LDr TREE 70650 at /E I78 4004 cow:MNY NN0 MAPLE I15,1/S 3 OVER 1,000 N.0 cf. 1 1.000 c.f. -460.2' .:. _� _-: __: Os 1 m Q O Z 3 1 3 OVER 1,030 6..1 0 6.r. 116.00 6.r. 50v..r. I now 6.f. NOT A PABRG LOT IEEE n663 6.L vs l � 0 0 Z 13 I F0AIRUS 0411016/OREGON ASH 125' 13 I 3 I DrR 1,000 6.r.0 6.L 11,000 c1, I 19.03 LL I 706.50 4L I NOT A PARKING LOT 110E I 706.50 6.1. I YES I 170 ANNUS RWM/RED AIDER 11'4/S 3 1 3 OVER 1,000 ell 0 0.1. 11,000 6.L 5027..f. 11256.64 cL N2 A PARR0 LOT 1REE 1256.64 LL YES 1 0 I G 1 FP.WNUS 0419LL4/OREGON ASH I r 3 I J UER 1,050 el.0 6.r. 11,000 c/. I 19.63 ar. 706.50 41. I N2 A PNKNG 1113 TREE I 706.50 al. I YES •,. ••� •• • •• cc z 1065 175"'.-41 0•, 1."""_. • 0., * . 1_061- 1 ci Z Q • 14 I FWJ0NL5 LAMA/OREGON AS4 1,J;• 3 I3 I OVER 1,000 611 0 6.f. 1,000 6.f. ...19.63 a. 70650 af. I NOTA PARKING IDT TREE I 706.50 41. I T. I '• `° I r I 1 0B'rp,.• 0 4 6.e 'v D • ^x ° 1 9-4 _ - F Z W Q _ 4.._ . .. . 21I'2:00p a„71`. -.--2.k-'.2.,:--'., ,:. ,i.. ,,:. `..s.,r,-2...,,,,.zz.:,44, I.,, . .T;. ..'6..i:::.'sc. ,..,',---.._V ',-.; i=:'�'1: ' : _. a °45.6.7 0 :f. -- '100.- I.1w5 -:..49,47- _ 6 04 Z 0 H 6.4 I maims IAIIFOA/OREGON ASH Y .3 3 OVER 1,000 4I.0 ac 1.000 6.f. 19.63 el. 706.50 O. NOT A PARKING LOT TREE 70650 cf. YE 82 AMER WICIM7UY NNE MAPLE IS 4/3 3 3 OYER 1.000 6.f.0 c1. 1500 cf. 7654 6.1. 17663 4f. 316 55 41.1 176,03 at YES 14 10 J I- Q 50 10001(3 0410014/OE0011 AAL 11.78• 13 13 OVER 1,000 40.1 0 el. 1,000 61. 19.43 4f. I 7°650 4E NOT A PARKING LOT TRE 70650 41. I YES 163 126X21%RUBM/REO 4OEA 15.11/6 13 13 I OVER 1.000 cf.10 6.f. 1.903 cf. 5027 4f. 125664 a. 28% 347 a.1 1250.64 of YES I x n � 6 seI45)29 S IAl*W14/OEGOx ASH 11.78• 13 13 0,9E taco eel 0 C. 1.050 cf. 19.63 41 I 70650 40. 55 33 cf. 706.80 af. YE 18501 1 AGER OROIA106/VIRE MAPLE 15'4/6 13 13 I OYER top acl 0 c/, 1,000 c f. 0027 Al 176.63 4L 355 61 0L I 176.63 6.L I NNS I O O 1 50 0002601 S 04709114/CREION ASH 11.75• 3 13 OeR 1,000 cf.0 cr. 1,000 a. 19.63 cf. I 706.50 cf. 14% 98 41. 70650 cf. I YES 1838 I ACR memos/NNE MAPLE IS M/S 13 13 I OVER 1,000 all 0 cf. 10.000 cf. I 5027 6.L 176.83 4L 335 59 44 176,63 6.L I YES cq W Q 1 6E 1010,00X{5 041Pa14/OREGON ASH 1 12s• ' 3 I S OVER 1500 ell 0 6.f. 1.000 6.i. 9.63 6.r. ]0650 6.f. x el a. 700.50 6.L E 184 I comas coma A/sc' r Ow I 2' 13 13 I OM 1,000,1 0 ef, 11000 a. I 7.07 a 70650 e. 405 285 f 1 70650 f I YES W !.5 IF1 FR4N8U5 IA5R9LL4/OREGON ASN 1.75' 3 3 0.50 1500 ell 0 6.f. 1.000 cf. 19.63 et. 705,50 at. 205 142 6.1. 706.50 O. I YES 165 i PRUNE 251101FEM/PURPLE LEAF FLOM4NG RUM I 4' I3 I3 1 CM 1,000 ell 0 1 11550 f 111!10 1 31418 1 316 96 af.I 314,16 f I YES La V 50 I iRAptA15 0418014/OREGON ASH i.7g' 3 3 OVER 1,030 6..1 0 a. 1.000 ef. 19.63 af. 70650 a. 13% 4 6.f. ]14.50 6.f. Y6I'll'''. 4-: �s / ', - aa a 0 Stl 16400s 0476014/OREGON ASH 11.76' 3 3 OYER 1500 2/.l 0 el. 1,050 6.r. 19.63 ei. 706.50 41. 15% 106 6.1. 706.50 ar. I YES �.Iw^� �I 11��11 ' •� _. '-:..�. .. ... - - 84 PRUNUS'.e)NI. )PIIAP,E LEIG ANG RI1Y ''''''"':;,v, S 3 OVER 1,000 a.0 6.f• '-4.-0-..0. 5021 6.f• 374.16.0. 5x 127 6.f, 314.16 al ,i O VY. 1- 5I I FM5009 04160114/OREGON ASN 11.75' 3 ,3 OR 7.000 cf.'0 el. 1500 cf. 19.63 4f. 70650 6.i. 6% 39 OL 70650 cf. YE 1 e50 I ACER CIFCIM1UM/NNE 16.44E 1 15'11/S 3 3 I'. 1.000 cf.0 cf. I 1.000 e/. I 5027 6.L I 176.83 M. Zx {O. 17643 O. I YE �_ I-' cc CA 51 1108211 5 1,010./OREGON ASH I Y 3 13 OM 1,000 cf.0 el. 1,000 cf. 10.63 O. 70650 40. NOTA MOW IDT TREE 70650 af. YE 14C 1 PRUNUS CEIMFERA/PURPLE LEAF f0OWWNG PUN 135'M/7 3 3 OM 1,000 ell 0 c.f. 1 1500 al 1 78.54 at I 314.16 4f. I 345 107 O. 314.16 a. I YES o CO O SK FRD0RI6 110014/OREGON ASN 1 1.75' 3 13 OVER 1,000 ell Sc!. 1,000 e1. 19.63 et. . 706.50 cf. 5% 38 6.4 70650 6r. YES 87 I AGR 510040 0/NNE MAPLE I S Y/5 3 1 3 I OE'Elt 1,003 6.r Sc!, 11500 cf. I 7854 cf. I 176.63 a ) 255 38 1 176.93 1 I YE G LT to 0 0 .m,.. ,T'. 111�,].�_1� ,.-... .i0^_:=_-F s' -'cr' .F..' -re� >..., :..;,•.:5-- ;:iI .P08 mclg_r1R 'i<! ,�_. 0 61 >7 5L FRAME 041014/OREGON A94 1.75' 3 3 I OYER 1500 c/.1 2 el. 1503 a. 19.63 al 706.50 6.1. NOT A PARKING LOT TEE 70650 af. YE LTJ T A a 3 3 3 OYER LOW a 0 c..f. 1,000 Si. 78.54 LL 314.16 f NOTA PARKING IDT TREE 314.16 of YE Lt' X cn 6M 0106,10X.5 1,079.014/OREGON ASH 2.5'• 3 3 OVER 1,000 all 0 cf. 1550 Si. 19.63 a. 70650 V. NOT A PARKING LOT TBE 70650 at YE I Wcn 6 FPAp0US CRUSC11J OREGON MIRS 6.91 2.5' 3 13 I OVER 1,30 61.1 0 a. 1,000 cf. 13.14 4f. 706.50 41. 22% 154 41. 3141`6 af. YE I - { k .- ' 2.11/91 000 ell 0 cr. s:e- 11000 u. 590 at. 1 176.63 6.f. 325 58 0.1$ na61 e.f. YE 4 CM94IAIS CRlSCAtU INEAYE/COCJCiUR F4YITIC/DN V 3 3 OVER 1,500 6..1 0 c1, 1,000 et. 3.14 al. 314.16 6.f. BS 9 6.f. 314.18 e.f. YE 910 • GRGMNYeJ • 4' 3 3 f.M Vldite n t+b�T ' '• 76' ':.- �81y'I 1733.0J.1}LI \�o 696. NEER GRGMNY/NNE MANE 3 3 ORE 1, LO 7 PYRUS OLIE1NA tHANIICIFR'/GA41MAEOt FlDWOONG PEAR 1.75' 3 3 1 OAR 1500 ell 0 e. 1,000 cf. 7.07 6.f. 178.63 cr. NOTA PARING L2 1RFE 178.63 cf. YE 4/3000 5.1.1 0 c1. 11,000 cf. 113.10 4f. I 176.63 cf. 1101 A PARKING LOT TREE I 17663 O. I YE N=O In 7A 005403 04/0 4/OREGON ASN 28.10 3 3 I OVW 1,000 411 0 et 1,050.r. 16.63 al. 70850 a. NOT A PARKING LOT IRE 706.50 a. YES 192 N0114 PJG1A/WESTERN RED 00440 114• I S 3 I OM 0.500 5.11 0 at 11000 c.f. 113.10 O. I- I NOT A PARKING L01 TREE I 113.10 6.f. I YE • F N. I e'ISRl9141N1/NNE MAPLE 1 1'5/5 1 3 13 OFR 1,000 of I 0 f 1000 f 12.57 1 17663 t I N2 A PARKING IDT TREE I 17663 at. I YE O I P/RR4 G4LEIYAM Y]WNWEDR'/CHANIpIIDi FLOWERING PEAR 125' 13 3 I OAR 1,000 ell 0 el. 1,000 at. 7.07 6.L 1790.1 al X01 A PNWNG LOT GREE 17463 al. YE B3 � _ .. - �` Z 8A EPA/ONUS 04T1DLA/OREGON ASH 3'Y/T 3 3 OER 1.000 6./.1 0 6.L 1.000 cf. 2827 6.1. 70050 et. N2 A PARING IDT 1REE 706.50 a. YE -1b•RfA�4 -'"•h' _, 3 3 ;,.r -,, d£4 4 TAS f5..,::L�.x'...'•� 355 4 _ 'F4 �:: J.Pf!1FIT-k�Y 74Vv.ama3" __- :'..6.i 3 ali .1 : _ o I BUNK - I- - I- I- - - - _ - 1- 65 I PIATNNS ACERIrO A/LONBDN RAMERFE 4.5' 3 3 ah10 1550 6.r 9 L IoW 1. 5027 f 125664 6.f. '475 589 a 125664 a�YE F4 v 1• S S1,000 f 1 0 6!. 1,000 of 2AZ/ l ) 7°6.50 6.f. NO A P11511NG IN TREE 70050 al. YE Ie PRUNUS GERV.LFEM/PJRRE LEAF'FLOWERING PI161 J5' 1 3 OrW 7.050 of 1 0 r 1,000 oi. ]°54 6.L 314.16 wf. NOTA 700040 LDT TREE 314.16 al YES M 1 FRAME IAIIRxIA/OREGON ASI J3' 3 3 I OR --- -� ... _. - �y �D] PRUNUS CFAASIFERA/PURPLE LEAF FIDM9LNG 8101 JS' 13 3 OAR 1500 ef.O. .1 1503 Cf. 7454 4. 314.18 6.1. 25 7 41. 314.16 at. YES 3 F:!1, •f"€:^ _ .'r )401 5 P1150010 1011100 SfA95 1 i YE& 1 BB PRUNUS 05143fERA/PARE LFAf 0100010X6.PLUM 35• 1 3 3 OAR 1,000 a.0 el 1530 6.f, 7654 6.f. 314.16 O. NOTA PN60NG LOT TREE I 314.16 cf. YE I I 1110001E 04109.4 OREGON ASH 3.5'3 M/1 3 3 OR 1,000 f 0 I 1000 5.I 262] f 70 50 f. I NOT A PARING IDT TRE 706.50 I. YE 99 PRUNUS STWNATA/WEEPING CHERRY 1• 13 3 OM 1.000 6..l 0 6.f. 1,000 cf. 314.I. 490.87 6.f. NOT A PARKING IDT 1REE 490.07 0r. YES 111 I PMAUS C41ERf026'CHANTICLEER'/CIANIICIIDi FlDWSPINc PEM 1.25- 13 13 1 0X1 1,000 f)0 f 1 100 c.I 3.14 f I 17663 4f, 1 N0T A PARKING LOT 1REE 1 176.83 1. I YES A 1 MS NUS GTI014/OREGON ASH 193 M 3 3 OVER 1,000 0.{.0 cf. OW cf 19.63 6.L 7136.50 e.1,. I NO A PARKING D RFE 706.50 6..l. E 30 P ATIM S,00010100!/WNWNRP=CHERRY 4. 3 3 MR 1,000 c/.1 0 at. 0.030 c f. 009 cf. 125664 4f. 365 457 J. 1256.64 al YES �� /�� t 101 YW15 SPP./CPABWPLE Y 13 3 OCR 1500 cL 0 cf. 1,000 O. 1257 a. 314.16 M. 245 76 61. 314.16 M. YE / � 1I l AAYO cazAr H.nle.�.en Atompia MA a- -I J -:.3,- • , 00 ti• Ir cl f5004t I 1s 83 f:l: I A PAR01G:lOCTfEE,.:.1 al, YES.- I 1102 PIATNA6 ACEHIFOLM/IDNOON PIMEIREE {• 3 3 OVER 1,900 ell O al 1500 6.r. 5027 6.f. 1256.64 M. 36x 466.t.l 1958.64 6.r. YE W rl- 6. PRINW EIMRGWJA ENTER CHERRY 4 1 3 OrR 1,000 f 0 c.f. 1000 cf 3 fi e.1,. 31416 cf. NOT A PARING LOT TREE 314.1 a f Ys 114 P76W6 SENRIMTA/WEEPING FIDW9OIC CHERRY 210 I,O30<l.0 6.f. 1 1500 6.L 3.14 6.1. 49031 6.L NM A PARKING IDT GREE 490.00 a(. YES • ;�, y'l I; `I I l/'-, �,••4 A _. -11 ,•"/ l{ \ .. 7)J 104 1 PANE CEAASff9A/PURPLE LEAF FlDWENNG RDM 1 1' I J 3 OVER 1.000 af.1 0 6.r. 1500 el 1 ].D7 al 314.18 at I NO A PN6WG LOT TREE I 31,018 nf. I YE W O ^,.'2, - :',111 ..... -..1 3 b'_. - 04:05.?' O.f' *•549:34.: r .6._ _ {NOF/.PA%I 6}lA�`-19 01 !.%{�,l�NY.. os RATNus ACE�Fn14/IDxI%IN PIAHERNEE 4' I I I I W - ."'- 1 3 J OVER Loco c.1.0 at. 11000 a. 502]6.r. 12564 6.L I 4ox 496 l 11256.64 6.r. 1 YES CO CO 115 ER4IIEG I 4, IS UR HAWTHORN 125' 13 J OVER 1,000 f 0 cl. 1,000 a 3.14 41. 314.16 af. 185 55 e.l.I 314.16 W. YES 1106 I PRUNUS 000.111 04/PURPLE REN'FLOWERING I I 1 O 6. 1 I I I W 0) N 5• J J OH.1.000 6.f f 1000 L 19 63 al. 3141fi f. N2 A PAPofBp L2 TREE 714.16 cf. TES 16 LY,,03106...5 C ONEA/SCARE/Q G SPUR MWIHOR 1' 13 3 I OCR 1,033 ell 0 cf. 1,050 of I 3.14 af. I 70850 c.f. 215 83 el, 70650 ac I YES ➢, 1 NSR P fTN ODES/ ' ' y OCR} 1,F p f IjpOEf, 7H W of ,r��L PD60p 1�{'1REE{.7864',06 ES J Q if ir iM W EItLE COCGNM/SCARLET 06.5 1' 1 3 13 1 GER 7,000 all 0 6.f. 1 1500 a 1 ]6.7 a 1 ]0650 6.E 15 10 6..L I 70650 6.1. 1E 11' OA P A YUTIF C£GR, - 1 3 3'�� OER 1550;cJ O a 171043 WY - I Wf A P��11DFiREE) 17 6391�+I YE' O �l 17 I MOS CALLER/6.x1'ONNIMADN/CHWACLEER FLOWERING PEW 1' 13 1 3 I OVER 1.000 6..1 D cf. 1 1,000 a 1 314 6f. I 77683 ar. NOTA PARKING IDT TREE I 17163 at YES I 09 TIp 6.. A/Y 4 10 Ep Cf NR � 2 ' S 3 O0 7 Sl 5 cfi ^'T2A4 1,f : Jg A Wf8@8 U lR'I 7 P 'l YE W 174 I COMM WRa8EA/BUR OM I. 1 3 1 3 I OE 1,000 6.-I 5 cf. 11000 el I 3.14 a I 49057 N2 6.f. 4 PARKING LER 114E I 490.87 4f. YE I 110 1 HMG RUGA/RED ALDER 3'M/1 3 :.._� OVER 1,030 cf.0 cf. 1,000 cf. 19.63 6.r. 1256.64 6.L NOT A PAR/010 LLT TREE 11256.64 6.1. I YE 40 I'., -- ' : •- 3p'v/31 -111,---e.- 2--,,_•.1.1''- WI.R 3 - ? ,',i-.... - .2.10,,.. -, 1604-1 746:50.E ';'7E- 1111 I AGER 8 ccmoo1/WE WAS 12'14/6 3 3 OVER 1500 ell 0 el 1,000 cf. I 19.83.I. 17653 atNOf A P/RKNG LOT TREE I 116.63 aI YE 0' I 1M WERCUS 0011X0,0/SCARLET GK I 2 2 I OM 1,000 c 0 1. 1,000 a 76.7 6.f. 70450 cf. NOT A PARKING LOT 110E I 701.50 el 1 YE 1 112 RATNNU5 NIIOF➢W/WNWN PLNEREE 1 4I' 13 3 I OVER 1,000 61.1 0 cf. 1 1,0es cf. I 2627 af. 1125664 Lf. 176 206 41.)1256.64 cf. I YE O J 4 >_. -.,.>,„-zJc <yP3c -:_ ; ..{,Ir• r_. 3_:_ , ,y.._,..,...,,,,,,, .%E... .a., e, ---- 4„.c '1,_ 'e0j ��1 ,.,,,-.,.„...,-,,,,N 7 .pa -1:,,,10'6. - -3�' _ „Oaf A . .6.T T. _-I n - ...,-.,_•,..-4,,,- m_ 1000 er F r1 '. P 1w _._._±,2_,..,_._ 184 fM1IIRl19 043096./OREGON 6.91 i 3 3 OVER 1.000 a.0 el 1.000 c1, 72 6.1. ]00.50 f. N2 A PARKING 12 TREE�70650 at.�YE �H •. {MI.�'_ I�,i �a,ii _ . .- _y � --; a'I,�1 c/ 0� -:. }UQO-F.f. 2837 a1 ..1- /�'A� �GREE� =•4+�I -1 YES..:.; �: :I � O ..�..,cJ. ,•., - ,6..,.. 6' - _5- :L 8210•._ . .�,. :-..,�L_. �,�Exix...�. ._ - - :� :_. .•.,__...�__ _-:... _ �:, .-. .: .. .�.. .�Q'1�1e�E�L#1..-:�,._-r-r-.#TNT _A. :LLLL_�`13,�1�Aa`•�i1���1 ,) ,..,... - ': _ -.�,. ...'- 6q�E'� _ .._ ,3••4/7 '3 3> .. 6.R 1,fA-tl s1, .:... '>Wao:.1. ,.iioTA4 -�q-'T..1EEa �{T (n H � a 200 WERCUS COCCIN00/SCARLET OAK 1' 3 3 OVER IOW 6.r.0 el 1,000 of 7.07 41. 70850 O. N2 A PARKING LOT'REE 70850 e.f. 116 e',ALL4 WN.. ,61'1 1, ,.. 1 5- 3 3 OVER 1,000 L.I. 0 c.f. 1,000 6.f. 254.47 Lf. 125664.1. 416 509 cf.11256.64 e.1. YES 7 I 200 I FMSNE INROA/OREGON MH 1' 1 3 13 1 049 1501 e1I 0 cf. 11,000 Si 7.07 al 1 70850.f. I NOTA PARING LER TREE 706.10 6.f. I YE I 1117 I ALR GROWNM/NNE MARE I 2'M/5 1 3 1 3 1 OM 0.500 c.f.0 c.1. 1,000 5r. I 2827.0. 176.63 6.f. NOT A PMKNG IDT TREE I 176.63 41. I TE I 0 co 1 Roc I FMpNUS 40110LIA/OREGON ASI r 13 13 I OVER 1,000 ad 0 cf. 11.000 of I 7.07 M. I 706.50 cf. I NOTA PARKING L2100E 706.50 Si. I NES 1 1 118 1 CLEW=1R°GWR14 INS./IIN0IDCUST 5 1 3 13 I OM 1,000 2.1.1 0 c.f. 1 1,000 6.f. 1176.63 of 562.11 4f. 645 816 41.1 96•L11 OL YES I 1200 1 FRA.NE 111FOLN/OREGON ASH la 13 I OM 1,030 all 0 a. 11,000 6.1 I 7.07 a. 70850 af. I N2 A PARING LOT TREE 70650 cf. I YES I 1 111 1 PLAT4NE 00 0054/LONDON 746970E 4• s 1 3 1 OM 1.000 4.1.1 0 el 10.030 el I 70.54 et. 1 1254.64 41. 215 269 cf. 1206.84 a/ I YE 1 1 21 1 GLMPAA IRMO/RHOS NERY5/#01001.DCUS1 5' 13 13 I OVER 1,000 6.1.1 0 cl 11000 cf 113.10 cf. 962.11 LI. I 35% 333 6.f. 06211 4f. I YES I I 1202I AGER 00017.006/WE MAPLE I Y N/5 3 1 3 OR 1,000 cr 1 0 f. 11,000 c.f. 1 1199..63 cf. I 176.65 Si. NOTA PN60NG LOT TREE I 176.63 s.l. 110 I 122 I=eve 1RN^ANRp9 INEMIS/HONEYIDCUSI 1' I a 13 OVER 1,0.0 0,11 0 c.1 1 1,000 of 113.10 al. 96211 6.f. I 395 371 l 862.11 at. I YE I WY._ fel-Pt,T /0. - S '0M-E Sr 0-4427 1,QW 6.i - :iragg6�u Y i 3 711''1 s I-� T. 'f,S'. '•'SgNpnGO6_B�11EJ L 15' 0sr - - . 6'.- _ 3 :1 - OVER 1000 af. 0.c I 1 .c. : }y�r7 _._ < 122 I AGER 000141 4119//NAE MAPLE 2'94/5 13 I J OVER 1,000 c.f.l 0 cf. 11.000 c.f. 2827 6.1. 17663 6.f. NOT A PARKING WI TREE 1 176.63 at 1 YES I• 900 , I.1i0.m o-.1 /M1005 pNM-•- 211_.- A _ '?SS'c.,;..'7'.'-''''''''Fr'''''-.'',','--7."1.:, > - - �' i s ": OVER,P00 e= 0�ef. '950 c:F'' T654if- .-_.a,' fD05__.;'_� ..:� ,„- ... '$�.k, .hWu:P?1rAiA t-. - AIN �'•'_--3 _ J. • WR'1560-el 0=r`- /,WJ 6.i 'tlsayy_p -_ <=;N6FA4P.lWOp;;(Pf Tuff ,:1-t5g7-:L'�_I xEs, > . :.etl --- 124 PIATMUS 0001/11100/10 N IE110 5' 1 J W.I,OW cf 0 01. 1 1,000 c.f. 11710 of 125664 1 405 560 I. 125864 6.1. TE 24 IFRWNUS 14110900 OREGON ASH 3' J 3 OVER 1,000 021 0 cf. 1,000 cf 19.03 4cf.0. 70650 6.6 NOT IBJ a/. 706.50 a. YE 1 244 1 FM%WIIS 1,0300,0/OREGON ASH 1' I 1 5 1 OVER 1.500 811 0 5.I. 1(OGO 6.L I 7.07 a. 70630 6.L I NOT A PARKING WT IRE I 706.50 6.f. 15 S 1 1125- '4 X.10 RATMIOEBJ.N 00.4' "e_7". ,r F3 3 - CNR 11040 1.1 4 7" J{15°0 cf. 5037 41: - NO112.111A10Gl0 WE 710E 50.2]'.1 1 lE. ' •,-I 125 I?RA1p1415 0410900/OREGON AAI 4'yr 13 J OVER 0.900 e.fl 0 et. 11,000 et. I 11.63 cf. I 70650 al. 726{ 101 cf.I 70650 a1. I YE - i 12 3,2.4 2L76473,/ . 12' . .3, ' 3.7.. -OVL;1500 cl'0 c.1 -. 1YAW of ”6"11Y4,1 - _1110 A3•6014-aa'79E/'i 1,l 19'8:1. I-YTS '.. .. ,7-7,\51E 120 I FROMM LATVIAN/OREGON ASH 1 12e 13 13 OVER 1.000 ell 0 0.1. 11,000 el 3.14 el. I 706.50 a. 1 255 175 O.1 706.50 4f. 1 YES 12M was WORMY/NNE MAPLE 1'4/S 3 3 OVER 1.000 c.f. 0 c.f. 11,000 6.6. 1963 al 176.63 41. I NOT A PARKING LOT TREE I 176.63 wf. YES I A V 127 I CREWS 1116AGWRIE NONE/HONEYI0005T 5" 3 1 0 I OVER 0.003 cf.0 cf.. 11,002 c.0. 7854 cf. I 96211 cf. I 285 267 6.f.I 0°211 af. I Y :-_v,�- i I /V f +11µ"IW�y�\.� I ._ ._0,,,.___,___:. O/9t 1 OAT 1ct-9,3.1„:_ _. 000 cr-__113-14, ::-...- { 075- : ',30 1 1_13,.2_110_,___1 YES I _ . 4,•, ' -,_: 45 I.3'.: Y. -ci }'. "i '. � "1 w. ,...$,;0:..1,2 . A ,,,11�.:Y].• _ .12 ".3 _ -0{011 f50S_ Dai 3.306 c1, ": 11350.41 NOTA PARION0 W[3� 113:10-, frS' - • 6 O• 4 _ 1104.,.,-.. _ .70,"'6.+`.1:.3 .45 II 027_ �y FAf60NOl1 1%t+`ryLrr ' _ 281 Gt6515N lRVCNl1105 NRY5/HONEYI➢WSf 4' 3 3 2496.1. Ocf. �249 cf. 15017 a(. � 882116.1 l i� 9� I.I 962116.f. Y6 � :T2®A" IH. FLG'rM �..��, "'''...'. -.. -I�P : _I 1.' 0{010.1-000=r,Fticf -.� 1000 r..f_�:133'0 t-.- - :'NOTAAWtY.G LOj iRFE� T;3 i➢uf Y6 �� ` 120 WW1=TR1101T103 REIMS/4/0251.05191 14• 13 1 3 1 OVER 1,000 a1.1 0 Si, 1 1,000 81. I 5017 cf. I 96211 41. 001 A PARKING WT IRE I 962.11 6.f- I YE 129 AGER 01008159/NNE MAPLE 1 1'M/S 3 13 OVER 1,000 cf. 0 c.f. 1,000 c.f 113.10.1. 176.63 41. I NOT A PARK00 LOT TREE 1 176.63 6.f. YES I - . .Seidel I- • ::'c}PR09`P477Yo/0EGA5947._:' . •1;0/4;'.,'/-:`'0. 4' 3-•••" {•oisittAf06<J,O., 1508-,. 71410.00-";., `. 1lat,s_ . - .'4.3'1-W,{} _Y< 1.'.LL- :C40016009APIif004000'71100 .. If' 3.,. ,.3 OVER,.000cTdc`" 1,0.00 176431L: :IWFA026408 101311100 1,,:63ai. lES I OREGON V :. .?RNr4M,EIosNERM4�/.. _.... • '.- _ •, :=.]::1 :'�-.rtWo, cf, T.. _ :'£. 'S,7,i5,4.1-7.;',: ',- iSb X141 f "4IDw �a'�_.-3 � 3' _RC1'iPO?D cfi,oPi -. 1 ca: a9em er' NOTA -RW ‘'(11 s,e:( 1Ys 1 103114 .�_._€ // It .` /�YL o-{ a� n np. 4,6 ms: - w5 314s6,Y,...9.e .... , 1 :, .yam l4 �._._.__. to } aRaoa• 9f f ddrd.h tbTrtFEI s�sa7si es <, 10/31/14 !Z/?./ 31 IHAA P(1G/, Altai RED CEIYR 14 J 3 OVER 1,000 6.f.0 of 1,000 c.f. 5017 RI. 706.50 al. 175 110 6.f. 706.50 al. I YE '_++' a,. { '? -: 25047 1 T- f 132 904!3.54 T64vW0IS DEl8I5/HO4EYWWST 1 46.'Y/T 13 13 1 OVER(,000 0,1.1 0 6.1. 1 1,000 cf. 78.54 J. I 06211 41. I 405 381 cf.1 962.11 cf. 1 YE 1320 ACM CIRGM14M/NNE MAPLE 1.2/S 3 3 OVER 1,000 cf. 0 c.f. 1 000 cf. 1963 82. 176.63 f NOT A PA76➢NG LOT 1REE 176.53 e.' 105 1./I 4P 133 1108.61 HEIFAORN'u/WESTERN B1DCK I Y 13 13 I OM 1,000 cf.'0 O. 11,00 6.f. I 12.57 6f. 11256.84 al I 40% 496 a.11256.64 cf. I YE 1 133 1 WERCUS MCCREA/SCARLET OAK I 3' 13 1 3 397 I. I 0 c.f. 597 al I 19.63 6.i 0 50 8.1. 1005 70650 f 1 70650 41 I YE I F A 34 0 051115(4 0RLNNRIIE DONS/IION0IDCUST 145' 13 13 1 OVER 1,000 6.11 0 a 11.00 6.f, 1 113.10 at I 90211 O. SD 1 �:R / .: 4 - - Y4'. .N 3 < 3 AYR S 710 0703 000 6..f -2571]a! 'I.- HOliLlf9495/1-TGF�,]It�' i "T3 �1krc. Y c i I (VALID ONLY WITH SIGNATURE) I 309 370 Lf.I 70250 ef. I YE I 135 I MORE 411X0104 GLAUG/Cm R CEDAR I-70 3 I T A A 100 6.i 0 0 f I .000 el !2 �elT 961 0 el PARKRG 559 f 186350 6.r 1 s 35 11LW 0116.3,0/WESfRN PID CEIWt 2 l 3 l S OVER 1,000 6.1.1 0 cf. I 1,050 6.f. 1251 6.f. I 70630 al. 355 90 6.f.I 700.50 6.f. YE l Lam-. - 1. li s! '"e' .......X"'.... 6.'.4 3 >.. 3 -.2;;,.3-.:433g* 626.+. I „ I r ' t 'B�a L+d YmA+9 P 1 46. TT e,'�m : ,, H .I _/rypp�p I ._ " I ,el. 1534tf±a.:_d 0,al .!4615O.I i -al._I X*-5. >, -''9 .. .. _ i -x_ - .:: ail 'WI ` r _-- tc z > z 37 �f T-J 4,4,1E/A11hll z' 13� J Sx cr. i o el. 534 cf. I2s7 al 7850 6.r. z6x 166.O.I 7psw 6.f. V3 I ��!'� 1d...e. e,+.•.•;rA.c. �`••:t",:- ..3'..•.o?a '.0�;7 ��`d.,.Q-�/+...,z:r];590.f:Y ::>;�s€:Er it ].:�,:hseiQtD1G" 1� � �YS'31t5--ri_,___ i FO I JB GUE RRA 1RMCAMN05 THERMS/00401000.53 135- 13 I OVER 1,000 ell 0 a. 11500 a. I 5027 cf. I 96211 of 385 30 ai.I 96211 6.r, I YE 136 ACE 1581594/RE MAPLE E 4S 3 3 312 6.f. 0 f 312 r 7654 et 125654 f 1 1,. 1250.84 J. 123654 ai. YE i ._ 139 AM RURUY/R.MAPLE 4S 3 1 3 1312 a. 0 cf. 312 cf. 7854 LI. 1 1256.64 at. 1 1005 1256.64 41.1 1256.64 6.1. Y. I :. OVER 1.`90 ail 0 i. 11,000 f. I 1027 f. I 0-I. I N2 A PARKING L2 TIRE I 3 00 - 140 ACR 76110.4/RED MAPLE 145' ] 3 1165 6.f. I 0 c1, 165 c f. I 7844 6.f. 1125664 a. 11005 1250.64 al.1 125664 6.I. I Yl9 I RLR ORdWNY/NNE MAKE l 3 M/5 3 3 OVER 1,500 / 0 f I 1500 6.T 1 5027 l I 176.10 a 455 44 f 176.63 a I YE /GREEN ASH l 413-• Rl' 7 / .4e.:-;:-..., I : - 1i:... 1 T N - 1256.64`. 1 ! 00 IDERI-„ - .. .: PIROO. r 141,0 FRNRIIS PFNNMVMM4/GRFR ASN 251ke 3 3 OM 1500 ell 3 3 OM LOW 0 a• LOW a. I 7554 a}. 11256.54 6.f. 100%1 125854 a.000 cf. 7651 . .f. 125654 la 1 100,14 cf.256 11256.64 1. I YE _ 1 43 - O16RU� OAK ;3.,, 3... 1 r.:. �P'•1.000 el.0 at 1500 of 1257 a/. 48081 6.L 65 39 6.1.� 480$7 6.L YE ., 142 010,00X..5 PENXSttVNOG/GREEN AG 25 3 3 OAt 1,000 ell 0 O. 1.000 cf. I ]454 al 11256.64 M. 110011 1256.64 af.1 1256.61 O. I YE q c s C� 44 I DUERWs 0401X00/SCARE1 6.4 2 1 3 1 3 I OVER 0.500 ell 0 a. LOW e1 1583 J. 706.50 O. I N101 A PARKING LOT TREE 1 708.50 cf. I YTS 143 FPA0NUS P010(511.00000/GREEN ASH 25' I J 3 0.Et5 150 a.0 et 1,000 a. 1 75.54 . 11256.64 6.I. 1 1005 1256.64 e/.l 1256.64 M. I YE _ '' 45 100010006 masa/sower 592 I Y l 3 3 OCR 1,000 m.1 0 a. 1.000 6..l 10.63 O. 706.60 6..f. I N2 A PARKING IAT TREE I 7.950 6.f• I YE 14 ACR 044049/RED MAPLE 25 13 3 165 c1, 0 c1. 1.000 6.6 1 7854 al 1125484 O. 1 1005 1256.64 at 1 125664 M. I YE o o v o 46 •111,04 106.,0X000 08109415/112NE1'DCUST I r 1 3 13 I'0CA 1500 al o cf. 1,000 et. 7.07 5L 96211 O. I 30% 265 6.L I 9811 cf. I YE 145 ACR RUoRUY(RR MASE 2.5' I 3 3 165 a. 0 cf. 1530 0.f. I 78.54 6.e 11258.64 6.f. 11005 17183 0.1 1256.64 O. I YE e 6.7 1 GRCNN.4/NNE WPIE146 NYI.449009)RFD MAPLE 125' 13 3 312 ed. 0 6.c 312 6.c 1 7854 6.r. 1 16.5.56{6.r. .1 )014 1256.64 al 1256.64 al I>B x Cl'U 11'M/6 l 5 l 3 I OM 15GO 6.1.1 0 6.r. 1,300 6.f. 506.a. 1794 O. 30% 64 a•1176.6.3 6.e. I YES 147 ACE INBRUY/RED MAPLE 25 3 3 312 a. 0 el 312 at I 7654 cf. 1125664 6.f- 11005 1258.64 6.f. 0736.64 a. I YES j 1,Ge6 LI 9 a. 080 cf. 314 J. 0 1. WM .r.I :Li I v 146 AOR RUBAUY/RE MAPLE 2Y 3 3 712 a. 0 Si. 312 a. 1 7854 6.L 1 195(1.64 6.e. 1 tDox 175464 af.1 1266.64 O. 1 YE 1 O z N 49 1 GEG73n 1X0100.5/HOaVLOCUST 1 135' I 3 13 OCR 1,000 6.8.1 0 a. 1.000 cf. ].0]a. 96211 6.f. 2317 219 6.L 96211 al. I YE I fn 5 In ' 50 NNW SPP./c 4102241E 1145 /CFR RUBRUY/RED MAPLE 1 26• 3 13 312 0f. 0 e?. 312 c1, I 78.54 cf. 1125684 cf. 11005 1250.04 0L 1 1256.64 6.r. I YES l O. 1 2'WA 13 13 I OVER 1.000 all 0 cf. 1,004 cf. 2827 6.f. 314.18 4f. 1 N2 A PIIKNG L2 170E 314.10 6.f. I YE La a 51 P76NUS CRA9FR4/10061E LEAF FLOWERING RUM -I 3• 13 13 IOM 1.000 611 0 6.l 1,000 et. 176.63 al. 314,19 cf. I N2 A WAKING IDT TREE I 314.16 a: I YE 1150 ACR RUBRUY RR PYRE L24" J 1 3 165 cf. 0 at I las 6.L I 7654 cf. 11256.64 a. 11000 125854 all 1256.84 6.1. I YE n X p L, 6 52 ACR=.RATA/4'NE I MRE 13 M/S 13 13 I OR 1,000 al 0 66 11.°00 cf. 5027 6.1. 176.83 el. I N2 A PNK°LG IDT TREE 176.63 at. 110 151 ICER 0100124 1 PED MAPLE 125' I 3 165 a, out. 111 a 7654 a. 1 1226.54 6.i. 1 100% 1256.64 6.L 1256.64 6.r. 1 YES Z I,_ 5 M to 53 AV,W,,_=HETEROPHYLLA/WESTERN H99OK 1 t' `3 3 OR 1,000 ell 0 K 11.080 a. 3.14 e. 126664 41. I NOTA FIRING LOT 1PEE 125664 a. YE 150 ICER 10.61000/RFD MAPLE 125• 3 1 165 al 0 6.L 1164 a. I 7854 6.f. 11216.64 a• 11005 (25464 at 12544 6.f. I YE I Q M N EN p cTi 54 RINW CEMSOR4/PUIIPLE LEAF F10WERNC PLUM 15 13 L` I tow al 0 al 11500 a. 113.16 al. 314.16 6.1. 1 N2 A PARKING 1,m TIM 314.16 al I YE 153 SLINK 1- I- I- - - 1- I- I- I- I- 1- I N^ z s0 • 55 I PRUNUS 0FPASOEIN/PURPLE LEAF F1.OWOBNG PLUM 14' 13 I J I ova 1500 01.1 0 et. 11500 c6.. 1 7554 a. 1 316.18 a. 1 NOT A POKING LOT TREE I 314.10 a. 1 YE I 154 11000X.4 PENNMNWIG/GREEN ASI 1 25' 1 3 1 3 OR 1.000 cf. 0 c1, 1.000 a. 11983 al 1256.64 O. 11005 125464 al l 1238.64 af. I YE 1 Z 05 00 W W E a 47-11.157-': ^'/ - I:-:5/5-1-1-I-1-/-5-...-7.:.--.'--:. ' :..",_.. 1 :-: �. :.-T. ' � 155 f1NWNUs PRxm0MMA/GREEN ASH 125' 13 13 OR 1,°W a.o at 1,°00 a. I 19.63 a.I. 1258.64 a. 1 1005 1258.64 6.L 11256.64 a. 1 YE I n 4 I I Z W E1ER0%Mu/ME1RN HEYWCX 115' 13 13 I OM 1500 a.0 el 1,000 al I 7.07 M. 160 FRANNE PE/15 MNBG/GREEN ASH 25• 13 3 OR 1,000 et.0 cf. 1,000 e1. 19.63 al 125664 al 1005 125664 al 125684 O. YE 3 Ln Ln (9 Z 1 1236.64 6.L 115 133 6.L 1 125664 6.L 110 1 I N N ZZ c N ''8 I MCA NLTLROPHNIA/WESTERN MAW. 115' 13 13 I OR 1500 ell 0 6.f. 1.00 at I 7.07 O. 11256.4 et. 05 70 el. 175164 al I YES 157 FRAYONE PENNSYLVAIG/GRIM ASI 125' 3 3 MIR 1,000 a.0 el 7.000 a. 1683 a. 1256.64 a. 1505 125654 6.L 1258.64 a. YES 'n W E 59 115(04 XEIFRGRttSLA/MEW%(000.001 115 1 I 1 001 1,000 6.LI 0 el. 1,00 6.f. I 757 6.L 1 124.4 a. 25 30 O. 12114 cf. I YE I 11 ACM RUB/661/RD 0APIEL 13 3 165 a. 9 cf. 14 a. 7631 6.1 12514 21 1005 1258.4 al. 12564 Cf. IS • 5.2CO W 0•4 04 02] E .0 1776665 CFR49FR4/PUI61E LEAF 010450ONG PWY I Y 3 3 OVER 1.000 01.l 0 a. 1.000 a. 50.27 at. 1314.15 at- N2 A PARKING LOT TREE 314.16 at I YE 1599 AGER RURUY/RE MALE 1 2.6• 3 13 185 a. 0 cf. 105 a, 7854 a. 1250.4 a. 1005 125664 cf. 125664 a. YES 1-Y vv C3 W m 81 I PRUNUS CERWOFRARPLE LEAF ROWDRC PUN Y 3 J OTR 1,000 ell 0 cf. 1.000 el. 50.27 a. I 314.16 cf. NOT A PARKING LOT TBE 314.10 O. YE 160 ACER RERUN RED WPIE 25E a 3 I3 1 a 0 c1. 185 . 755 a 4 . 1258..64 02. 1005 1250.64 al 1256.04 ao . YES 62 1 OLER05%C'3CGN50/5GaE1 0PURPLE 00 11' 0 0 - I- - - - - - NO 161 ALR fUE1NN/REO MAPLE 1 2S 3 13 165 0.I. 0 el. 165 a. 7054 a. 1258.4 a. 1005 1230.4 cf. 125664 at YE ca 63 I PR10105 C0R45IFEM/PURPLE IF.2 FLOWERING R1111 4 3 3 OVER 1.000 6.-I 0 cf. 1500 eI. I 7654 O. 314.16 a. NOTA PARKING LOT TBE 314.16 at YE 102 ACR RUMOR/RED MAPLE 25' 3 3 279 al 0 cf. 229 a, 7884 a. 1256.64 6.L 1505 1256.64 at 1258.64 O. YE V� 6 Op/, 64 11501 CO2441UY/VIE MAPLE 2.11/3/ 3 3 OM 0.000 al 0 a. 1,000 6.f. I 2827 el. 176.63 a. NOT A PARKING L2 TBE 176.63 a. YE 163 ACE RUBB14/RED MARIE 25' 3 3 230 a. 0 0.1 270 a. 78,24 a. 1256.64 O. 1005 125664 al. 1256.64 a. YE ,54, v I 28.27 a. 176.03 et. N2 A PAROL LUT TBE 170.53 a. Y1 164 WRWs 0000X04/SCARLET 03 25' 3 3 OYER 1500 a 0 af. 1,000 cf. 240 a. 70650 et. 105 70650 er. 70850 41. 95 4 W 6N AIDE(009411111/NNE IMRE Y u/sWV 3 3 OVER 1,000 01 0 at 1500 c1, ,0,- ! s I 618 NIDI 046.X81114 4410 PYRE r Y 3 3 OR 1,030 s I.0 a. 1,000 a. 105 066515 X6.400/SCARLET 000 25• 3 5 I OM 1,000 d l 0 a 1,000 Si. 2827 a. 70050 Si. 130% 70850 at. 700.50 a, YTS �„ Pr / /S I 27.07 O. 172.71 a. NOT A PARKNG l2 116E 9]411 a. I YE -'C9 i,Y O ss I?imnsN FRUONRps 6016E xalen5cusr tab I AGR RLIOBO/109 MAPLE 2.5• 3 3 1145 cf. 0 6.r. 1�a. 7as4 a. 1256.64 a. 1005 1256.64 a. 72594 O. YE Q .1'° z N / 1.5Y 3 3 OM 1.002 6.1 0 a. 1.000 cf. 7.57 at 17613 ar. 285 769 e.f. 97213 a. I YE a� W 64 ACR CIRCNANY/NNE PAPE 1.5'Y/3 3 3 O.'R TAW 6..l Oal 1000 a. 125]a/ f]a63 at. x2 A PARING UR GREE 176.00 al YE 1,6/ I ACR 10.8600/no WPM P5' 3 13 f 164 al I 0 el. I ies el 7034 a. izs6.4 al 1005 tffia6{a. t2sa64 al I YE i I`�1•' V, n 67 I PRUNUS NRGNLO48/CMAOA RW 0IIOCHR 0 1' 13 3 OVER 1500 0.1 0 a. 1550 et. 757 et 314.14 O. N2 A PARKO10 IDT 1100E 314,16 a. YES tee I ECR Fiume/RE RAPE 2.5' 3 13 l 145 a. 0 a 1165 cf. 78.4 a 1256.4 a 100% 125964 a 12564 a. YE '/ \ : 66 I ACE RAINAWE/6041141 MALE 1' 1 3 3 ova 1,900 02.1 0 a. 1500 at. 7.07 at 1258.64 O. 37% 487 cf. 12564 at YE 189 Ina RUBRUM/RED MARIE 25' 3 13 1 150 a. I 0 a. 1185 el. 78.4 O. 1250.64 a. 1008 1256.64 a.I 1256.54 al LIES 4{y 1444, Jv - 1 ACR CICN0IO/NNE AWE 2'4/3 13 3 OR 1530 dl 0 a 1500 a. 170 1 ACR RUBM11//�R�E�D��_M_A�PLE 25• 3-I 3 195 a, 0 a, 195 a. 7654 M. 1125844 O. 1005 1256.64 a. 125664 O. I LP. 9 I 282]a. ]0.8]O. es 6.1. 1360!a. E 71I I 8 9 GOO c 70 IALE C0C0AM1/NNE MAPLE 1'Y/s 13 3 WE 1,000 ell 0 a. 1500 O. I 1257 ar. 178.63 O. 286 46 al 17683 a. Its 0,0,0X1..5 PFN /GOER MI Y 3 13 OVER 1,030 Si.0 a. 1,950 at 1053 a• 1125&4 a. 7001E 1258.4 a 11256.64 O. I YE ]7 I ACR OIR5NA104/NNE WPM 1'Y/S 3 J OVER 1.000 6..l 0 a. 1.000 6.f. I 10.63 e1. 1 176.83 O. N2 A MOM WT 110 176.63 el. YE 1172 10WO0.1�5 70H/�0�1011/154/�GRR�EEN ESN 33 �� �3y�4,,,/,‘!".%',7 �i,�/�WE 1,000 6.f.5 ccl��y 150,3 a 1°6�3 LI. 125864 L 1 W% 1256.4 f 11254.84 al 1 9S r���� a I AO'R CIW WUY/V9E MAPLE r Ws 13 3 OTR 0.000 ell D el. 0.000 ef. I 2627 6.f. 17463 at NOT A PMIONG LOT TBE 176,63 at YES 'PiJ'7D%��'Jl 0550154/3n10((Illff47..e/0�1.7L'.;r/?/.% ...4:12/,'.. ./Y//HIS A/slll,,/,! `'4 1./ ✓/0 ..,72•���i g.1117,`Y.. 'r'83 5/.-7/f 2 01.1/6///.O/�.1,00 2 174 AM RUER10/RR MARE 25' 3 3 OVER 1,500 c.f.0 et. 1,000 cf. 7654 at 1258.64 cf. 1005 P.1256.64 al. 1256.64 a. YES I it 41Cr ta SEE THIS SHEET TO THE RIGHT FOR CONTINUATION SEE SHEET L7 FOR CONTINUATION Ea e 2 I^ N W % 1 J d 4 co gag: g,Ngogg it, ' R1e a41m#4 , mit :A +iii �n,F r g'tli:5 9Ii 1 N•t 'i' VA- §lu aa. ; A ei ;tea me:w 1 EaReREm8g '.1 CA V i ! I —+ J fmfl iI Pg �i:.A0.186 € f 4 h1 Pri:1 111 ', t' S' 888 i'till8 g , I g r ; g.g .1 a -0 " ' i li cn * r r . 1 i � s ; £ 1 I I -14 _ '� i iliiiiiiiii m z ,C° i ke -i; r t + 1 �_ 1, s, R M,� 1 . �, ;, . „ I ii, ',I I ' � R .' ' AA '4" �e �. ,} � ! o,, leaHigggdomo —1 �� - '- � j k.r.. .',...1, ,1 ' .rj Eii I >I 6 { F � ,� 1I C) IT, '�i , i I ",; k O v w z --I Ykz s\A w 8:sxk I2,": •g44Ing a,-4,g.+a; .,-. YCG .n-:u t 414 Yw4u G C�'•G \ �,t �� E. ` 1� I ,n >< � � 3�3�1�s � I Y4'�i �G',G4',f.,Gy' CtCia C [ y: '� la��� I f 1 ml �,S�,�, 1 � SS �' P� 'lY � wwwwwwwww 1,•,,,,... w uw �" �:� n��uN I + - _i 0 wr<�w0 ..w -Iw nw Hw; www�W . Www �u w w �w� wwww wnn O --- { , 1,'f f w _. �� z Wry -.+#w 1l� 1 ulw C 1111131111 \ ;111313 111 s 1 ii11 all t i itiil iii 1 71.0i110; _.t4 44L4E4131111444r4R1 D b $¢ y �,..pppp ;55��� .. w w $ Iq' ppppgp 4qqpp pp ppppRR R y g�p qp 2 p ypSt p 4 p Y 2 $$} $pYy$p ,__1 S8 ttgSSg8 \-tEE § S $ ..L- l'i g. 1[ --= EE§§ 11':16 SSSSSIS 7S{{PST25�SS --E`" '25 i535S --S§81 E13 ..] i5 E -S E $i58SSSESS V 2..l A A A A C C C C C C a'C L C :`C '1;4 _._, 81 *, 2,C C C a 4 D. -=t- 41;;;t:1P1,14 :r n w.= t 4 t 1 >.C C 4 4 : ,°4 Ck -:: - 4 ''' r n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !Yo� � �o so i; o� -C C:, C C-CCC C tC^ CPrnP PP P. A 2,1,,`X0 ti.1. P r r } P E.r. ;,C nr PPn i-o0 1 . 000000000Et 1 1 i IC 1C _ t ,-C , , fl C-, . 4 . . . CCP . Inn i- s ,, r en rrn PP nC. P.P. Cr. I i y__ rt fittliv§t-§� tR,•a§$t :-§x,1 1 _k Ok Ila` 'n1 �§.§-§t. §1 _§ 11111 t 71 �1 r I "1 i.iii tiiS� ' - 1 ' ig� , § =-§1 - v§t-§-§tgt ;0 n r P P P n P e r t,,5.C r ^ r " 3"s ..4,Ii-'. P1.r.I;C.C MI'•' -i n n yIC t C t e P 4 t, n n - C C C P r .i t C ^ D.It 1 IS, C P P• r . ^ t^ P P n e ii w 4441144144 'r,, '�. A1� � �� e r 1� �1�i�1 � s 0�—� 1 � -'� --�- �tyjj, G j� � - � N- � •1 �„ - 01iE r 44 41..4a .a+ E ECS D u;x ;; 11 , 444 u t 1 � f 11ae44RR0s040411 AAAA 4AAAA d[. A. :r I 1-tr.'..I I.It 121:x` P r.2_ 01 P. .:.;:.r: 22G !Gs _,;i _ AA G :le !AA g.ee.eAAA r.r, ! ! N 3G (, a 1' li to, 17, i V '�I Ip 1414'''''''''''11 '.1161' 1 ,y ' ''`'11 '1 ' i 1 [ ' I Ir-, ,,i t "f , 1aC ^1 �'1 RR2Gg P 22. i 1 s ti 8 g Re' R = -8t, 1r • r : g -•g RRrRT X ERIr'Ra RE 1 � RR •g { 1 i. I , EEEE w � E $ �s�19 1 1d�=; ,B.;�. :$$ ;,$$ C¢Gr. C,r..GG "1 e^ I . t' K .i T a2 -RR RR R 2 RR . 4-1- _ 1 _G � :. Cr.r • '�1iG CCCCG 4 2 Cr r r 1 A 1 ; I1 i£&NI 44 1 1-It4 £1 44 ! .•1. ! 1a4aa 1=x1 �� !f1! a +_MA A s N-4 !�I__ ! 4I p g -RR"R 0.iPpP4 - 55,-5 ,& ,, 6AN . 4,__4 5 � ,52ng%� � � � 'V21-5/05'4-8 5 - ;;;; ;;; ;; ;. ; 1 BREC gggFtmry gg y g iA14 A. _ uI 6? - r - o tiY " RR 'tt2 CGtt G C t G ' 1Z1 14' 2. r. e. G A. ' t ?„ tLr Pn ^ rn ! rr ! !) ii01P11 Pw 0 et r�1= 4w mslYE` $,g 'sdv41Lad r o* gggtiR8Nxwj.i+NI �'ma — $ RRRRRERERReBBBIrb .BIRR .34S1c . Y : .I:20, * TBBBB C Ca8$ Yl!r li EEsi i.$: 'otzl8r., • a' C - :2: R R R R AGC =AA it C -5tr r! GC • t ,iM t.C4C C.IS : ! C-^ r.., I P1tC .! ! Pr.4.. t P r_ 4 4C S ! !41 G C CrCCS ! ®Ir tit tit. _ ! r! rCCCCrrt • ' -ddddddddd g\ dddd , k01. 0.i.. d d 6; d6d}d' 66664 '6 6666 -6666l6dd5t 05ddd0�i" 60 COO x .0500 ddud01660660065066 , 1 1 'to — _ 1 i � ( _ CA iiii #g 18.1116>,`;1. . .11116111/ 1611111' 11 1.1Sm/ x N EX ggg5 g 9 9II8588ifs=ig'emz nu 144yt1•a g .v. � 4� \g 1m CA i � t i 1 6 1 i I I i i 1 1 i i i I gt1 ! g11 g ig 1 1 i 1 81 s 11 1118 8 �" �k � ��1_; /' L `0101 :t is '1 _ 11111 : _ pp§E\Eg $\E L �L Z � � a � �Cy g � , ' g 5yp� < ,.W. W0,1,*-- ' - -.p„MINI + ic; g Inq Ql Sp MM Mg` ` 15T1 8 �' o \I,\,- r 5--5 ,St'`I 5\ F , • \\\ �i ;N k`\` \F \` �\\ \16 i• t gulYYiA -a " E4 i ii 1 1 IIS I i1 i 1 1 . t\ " i ;� s z „�_ � m � � 3 �i � � s 4 i 1� 5 i g k \ ` . i - 34\ 1 �} >e —mI ii 11 1 C) r . k y. v.vv `k„' \vN,,,. .t.:.g \\—,„ ,k,,,,,k \, ‘.\.......,,,N \,.. .„..;...„..,„,.,, r I• se\ jamA' g'• t....4 . .+.„,• a r A A A A HYY,„ YYY Y Y a GY IqC G HC g. g,C .Nn ow 44•Guw; g. \a. .,\\ ..\'\.,.v- t174- 1 t. • zwwwwwwwwwnnN nNVNNwwwwwwwnwNwa wwwwnnwwnww wwwwwwwwwwwwwwnwnwnwwww ww ��k\\ A. N`\ \\S� _ w- O � sk � ,`�� www ao t\O000°ownnno° oa°Oeo wnwwwwwwwww wwww wwwnwwnwwwwwwwww�wnwnow \\\ .�Nw Nr �\vf�t o� O ;15 g g 1 1 11 111E 1111111111111111111 Q 11111!1111 1 111 13 311111 111131 111131111\ \ t •1\ \\\\,1�\\ �\v,;\ !1 D CC^ P n P ^ \ V A y \\�\ A .-A tt t A§tt ttgtgF§V§tgt >- ' g ' tt §t 11th.§.§.§-§FrgF§t-§t t.§tttt- 1\\ yv$e�� §y v-- § ;, � i,' § —� t C n P PPC ��n,t^ ^ C C ^ C C C r r P P P n t r t I-' r P n n n P P P P n C C C C ^-^ C C t F C C t C C C C C F C P P P P PCC.:X,k,,, \ \'\V, \l P�`\P. \\ P \S,•:..\.,: , . E�"xN C G— O `��\or,a .00000 eo ... ... . . ....... .... 0 0.. ..... ...... ...... ... ♦ \\\ o. a \ ..., vv o \ \ \\ ^ C C t C C t^ C t C C t��r P n r P n r P r r n r PPP P P e r i P C *C C^ ^ tP P P n P ' n P n r P n r P n P P C ^C C” C C C C C C C 2 C C C � - \P `@� t \•• ` N.t- \ � \ 1�^ ^ z . . . . . . . . . . . . ��\ ' �� �\� ‘, ,\,,,. \�� eeee,gtt'girth t tgtgt-gt' -§ ii I= ' Ig §� -§-§t ' §gt tttt-§tt ggt -§ -§- tg k'' \ ^ i'' i \ \'7`\\-S� \ . 7; ii00 C. . . . . . . . A A A AAA . . . . . . . AAAA . AAA . . . . . AAAA . . . AAAA . " AAAA AAA. . . \\\ A.�. ,,?,,,t, -\ � - \\ l\�'! C ysuss �m ss a� � -- - - - eMAA \\\ � \ Q ��A`\ ' "� � \` "ssRMi e 44044;;221444%14;eaaassssss4yEy;R E4 ses4Cslsssss ' e �� �4 ; 44: 1a;ee14e4400488 -44\��; co N N SEE SHEET L7 FOR CONTINUATION rn WEE SEE MORON 1 PRLSERVA1ION OPEN 509. WVERm 50L /0161 555RNG 1/A1URE %Alp NEA OVER I OU05Y0N0 I PRES0NA110N I TREE NO SPECIES cEjI8I9 ROM RHINO 001440 VIXJ%AE 506.VOl140 CANOPY CANOPY KIMONO LOT SIE CANON Z 390 ASIGHUS PE/216%10%CA/GREEN ASH 3' 3 3 129 et 0 M. 120 c.f. 5027 f. 1250.64 1 1001 125464 f 1258.64 a1 n 0 ',,,:y.../fes .0 v ////// /%,g%�� r'%'//. f,r// /% moi////,09"'//./i . // /i/ , ///x m r 7 y"-'i y ' '',', /,%///.11.% ',/'/ 3//�/l/ � , // Vz/ ' S',,� ISS//,•,4-',,,0%,;„5-.,;-., /,//,/ i r," , 1 Ili Z W � .�. ., y 293 RNtlN115 PENNSYLVANICA GREEN ASN 3' 3 3 511 et 0 et. 291 c.f. 50.27 af. 1230.64 / 1001 1256.64 1 1256.64 M YES , 1 390 117.451015MVA V5 PENNRq GRED ASH 3 3 3 327 eMel f. 0 . 327 . 50.27 ar. 11256.04 af. 105% 1258.64 O. 1268.64.1. YES 1 p E 0.y. • 1395 AGER ROBRIl9/RED%APRE 35' 3 3 354 ef. 0 er. 354 ef. 7254 a1. 1 1256.64 M. 100% 125664 el. 1256.64 O. YES c IID 0 396 AGER RU0501/PID 1MPI1 35' 2 2 185 c.f. 0 c.f. 165 ef. 50.27 af. 125684.t 100% 125884 al. 125664 af. YES t .- Q Q Z 397 ICER RUORI1/RED MARE 35 3 3 165 ef. 0 CI. 165 et. 5027 af. 1250.64 M. 100% 1258.64 Pl. 125854 61. YES Ili < 9.VZ 1398 ADMMORON/RID MARE 35' 3 3 155 O. 0 e1. 165 tI. 5027 M. 1256.84*1. 100% 1256.4 61 1256.64 M. WM i 0 O 1 399 ERANNU5 PENIISHVARIG/GREEN 091 3' 3 3 285 el. 0 e1. 285 M. 5027 LI. 1256.64.1. 100% 125654 6/. 1256.64 at. YES R Z W 400 19 011115 PENNSNYAVICA/GREEN ASH 3' 3 3 245 et. 5 M. 255 c.f. 5027 M. 1256.64 61. 1001 1256.64 6f. 1150.64 a1. I YES 4 J Q 401 FRAME PENNStt 9441CA/0024 ASH 3' 3 3 488 ef. 0 e1. 488 ef. 5027 6r. 125054 M 1001 125684 at 1256.64 LI. I YES V 402 MOMS PENNSYLMWIGA/GREDI ASH 3' 3 13 488 M. 0 M. 460 et. 6027 M. 1250.64 61. 1001 1256.64..f. 1236.64 LI. I YES i g I0 403 ACM RU96RED01/RDARE 55' 2 1 2 1 105 LI. 0 e1. 185 tI. 50017 4t )1256:64 61. 500% 1256.4 ef.1 125654 LI. 1 YES 8W CO Sy 404 9LEA RU2R014/RE.WP5 M.I. 3 3 13 1186 0 c.f. 165 et. 5427 M. 110264 M. 100% 125404 61.1¶234 W g J 64.1. 1 YES u c 405 ACR RUMBA/RED MAPLE 3- 5 3 1 3 1 165 LI. 0 M. 185 cf. 5027 I. 1256.84 M. 100% 1256.64 a1.1 1250.64 af. I YES g g IS O •• ' �• *7«i. 69.27..f. 0 4. 01 0«l. 0 4. ''-' 407 16404 S PD1NS1tVANICA/51614 ASH 3' 3 13 1 EIA LI. 0 M. 1 e7 cf. 5427 6f. 1256.84 M. 106% 1256.64 at 125264.1. I YES /et O 40 9 112234 S p54451 444MA/0Rm14 791 1 3' 3 3 1291 LI. 0 UM . I'BI . 502LI 7 . 1256.84 et 1100 .1 % 1256.84 M. 1256.04 O. 515 RV U Co409 FAWNUS PEN 2.00NG/GREEN ASH 13' 3 13 1291 C.I. 1 0 et. 291 et. 60.27 fa1258.84 M. 11001 1256.64.5. 1256.64 M. (Y6 $ Z VJ 410 I AGER RUBRUM/RED MAPLE 1 35' 3 13 1 165 M. 1 0 es. 165 e.f. 2827 e.f. 1250.84 M. 1100% 1250.64 61. 125464 at• Iles 9 P 411 1 AMR RUEMIM/RED MAPLE 135 3 1 3 1 165 M. I 0 ct. 1 165 ef. 26.27 LI. 1258.64 el I 100% 125664 M. 125.64 M I YES 0U 412 ACER RUDNW/ROD 1/AP5E 1 35' 3 3 tm ef. 0 et. 185 cf. 18.27 af. 1256.54 r 100% 125464 6f. 1258.64 al YES X I.1 %� 't%if f 7 .rik / ///.// '6 i'y//%/��✓.J//1////f.'('. � .,E� "V%�' ,"/, , '/./// Ar�r/////1''/ � i ,, i 8 m LU V Cl) „qi/.�o /�' //f i, ,- 'moi/, / �4'• 'a '/ � r /✓/i�,/�,r '.-� vi� y ., C ':SU'%J//%/11,.,i;,,,ffe;;i:;r,-', 'r;..'///''/<' G%%O�i�///, ,7.„ /%//i///d d:0'J/ff Ari,///J/1i/✓r00,J/.,,y Sf :' i/�l�i/3//J//J/ ,,h//„f8'- »; 416 A1F14 0UBRUY/RIM MAPLE 3.5' 3 0 843 M. 0 et. 843 ef. 2527 af. 1256.01 f. 1001 1256.64 M. 1256.84 of YES cc 417 LSANx I- I- I- I- - - - I- _ - _ a co 418 OL.V:N 1- II- I- - - - _ _ - - H 419 AGER RUBRRI/RED MAPLE 1 35 I a I 0 543 M. 0 ef. 543 ef. 2827 M. 1125664 LI. 100% 1258.64 M. 123654 M. As 420 AC61 RUORW/RED MAPLE 1 s.5 133 185 e1. 0 Cl. 185 et 21527 M. 1 1256.64 ed. 100% 1256.54 M. 1255.64 M. 1 YES 421 ILEA RUMBA/RED MALE 135' 13 13 1 165 a1. 0 c.f. 185 ef. 2827 M. 1 125464 at. 100% 125464 LI. 1258.64 M. 1 YES 422 ILEA RUBRUM/RED WPM 155' 1 3 3 1 145 at. 0 et 165 et 2027 M. 1 126484 61 1008 1256.64 61. 125654 at I YES 423 ER/MUS PENNSYLVANICA/GREEN ASI 13' 1 3 1 0 1173 M. 0 cf. 173 ef. I 50.27 M. 1 1256.64 M. 1001E 1258.64 a1. 1256.84 6f. I YES 424 RAO.PENNSILVANICA/GREEN A94 3' 3 0 173 0.1. 0 Cl. 173 M. 5027 af. 125601 f ' iG100% 1258.84 M 125 44 oYS / 1r� -% / ' ti fHfA:4/// //,�/"/;�,,,/ //�/ /,,. %fytrm Tr , I /' r Ur1 / � !„ .yn1 . / -/ %/p.4' fA; i 9 �%//" Ira, 1 / // '� • /,G W N ;17416)Y../1%.",.,)'•y / / am// J r,",,///,-, ,o5,9/ wa .,,,./4,7 i� , Ja' / / e�� //e/ uJ %////%� /Y/Omo/ev / / / Q /" ' " ;ug ,./..;,,,/,,,,,,,,/,',//1ao %A �% /r,�/Or.J' r � /J / ii/ / / ' /// /y„/ CO > i, api3 ) ji / /r;. Yom,�T,/,A% /%%/'%/%%/ / / � � %/!/ ^ !r , �/ //' '''.. /,..!2: 'r,c,1 W 0) i18W45 - - - JC 1442 I6uNN I- I- I- I- I- - - I- 1- 0 433 IBLAK I i- I- I- I- - I- 1- I I LU j 434/�9ANN i / ;/ / /�/ ' .s1,"/ 470.4ei,�/iL%ri,f!';'� 27./ /'•' r TAW /J//y.K.',7//, i..% %P//%�f%/// �' Q I- /r.11'.:ffota, , hy'�' // % /,',.,////F''G.rtY#41r-'%0%/i////�i,'g''Ai ® /�, /fir n2i///,017//�/J////J%�n/'// O J a MOM.;; AS.,.3�''.li i h ,�� 1' F'/,YY/lar...,,,007, i; '�f&IT'MG ':Z' ye X9 '5/'// // H O yi; .40.%,;:=1 ,/01..02,4:45"///////�/%/////',/////E f' ' / .P•, /. //.Y!//�D'.,1,//,010i.///////��� 1 ,51 u/J///; /////////J/1�///, / !/ • f/3// O <n C:7 "yr"f.: -,.,("%,"1,'"';'''?"- 7 7.///%4 v//`. /. L':/ r)55' /H/!/:� > o:. /. / ". `y". /// ,. j'4 co NC% 0 co MOTES EXISTING 1RD5 61 NO 40101ER COPPER t X _ V :>t , �E >=' _.__. . ¢•.:�.•6,a_ ,.t,ME.s�+s;::Z4.34. . akx%s,..,;'-J=x=�: ._k? a1 x .XLL-: ._.:- 00101ES TREES WN21106 14540 OF 1 OR LONER G 1e 1- Ir. 1. Ir..'. - ) 1 ' I:: - ODp1Es 0111RD5 ro BE RDAOJm EOR PROPoSm IYP 1.000 et. .f,7'./,P4 ,r//i iii:%.,,,,/,iii%P /z/////., '///%//J, IM IIIIMI LLLLL� _ _ py i a� It' < , / % TCHLIW tHE�T= .3�\�\ N \ MA E St 1 R 0 G> Ave1. t o-. 6.:- - lir. ,F Z 1"=30'-0" qP �A� / / \\ � ', illi : 4t' �` w$til '4 \1 Z wa 0 IS 30 60 a;f:. c` 7''' '-,..o I ,� I ._ j • \_epigrf o W ® 7 \ 1 [�' sfl /"�I �J°r ` 1111 = O (= \ r Li 'i p O F \ ,�. 1111 3 °- z Aged '" .(5' ,„,,,./;.- \\\ j sn illi •sb. �.,�:;,�".- 0\0 �\ � '{,r _ I t O J F Q ,, /1 �f y�..�1 F 1I� �n I i6i'bei N W Q O O / IIf1l� l '1 / 3 � U � I► I , ,.,*,/' , \\\ ;6 p� ,c1r, lot I qZ N p U \\,\\ 11 'TI II , ,fF , \ II _ I _ •. L J f.,/ t ,ice ff r -` W N. I •' II • • IIIF id _ �, // ;' ' e 111 3 .` Qwo "s',...- / / - • - - iiiil 1 /-----... / _I ,--, ....r /4 ..'*"... / II II , d,1,__ _+ i i / 21 / . • =Y�TO -w / 4J/ 1i \ Q i y , , / t. i'.., -W- - - _ -�. TT- -w_ _ - _�y _ - -w w- .-� -w_ _ --fir-- - -W_ _ /3,/ •/ O D 'ILF' ,1121 - / / ----.... ,../ // ., . , II , : :j_. 1 _, „ii c=4,E=D i 1 0 I 0 I I / — .._—_-=_ _.-7-_[: -_,- i i ••••,,,,,,..r.' it I . Y. a , �/ G\Si , ___ � 7 o r • • , . . .e�/ I or—!1 i 7 1 i v 641 • cli � - Arthur-•,-, I — /1 / . cgpyt>� �\ I I . F A } I J VV I (VALID ONLY WITH SIGNATURE) - - T 1:CPSTCCP .. 1 , t Q Q 1 .. •I i < n n i . r. V. I LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND I III II IIIJI7' : I I SYMBOL BOTANICAL/COMMON NAMES CONDITION SPACING QUANTITY REMARKS I,. - ' II' II !' = I x • ---.-•=__.—.: I TREES. II. I \ c oB $ c w GREEN ASHNSYLVANICA/ 2 6 B SHOWN AS 7 NURSERY GROWN FOR STREET TREE USE,E MD GUY FOR ONE GROWING I I. I 0 LA i 4111 BRANCHED AND 6' I I LI LI LI ll LI LI Ll LI II Il IJ 11. 11 ", ' a GLEDITSR TRIACANTIIOS'MORAINE'/ 2'CAL AS 6 I STAKE AND GUY FOR ONE GROWING SEASON, I I } y I z MORAINE LOCUST B&B SHOWN NURSERY GROWN FOR STREET TREE USE, ; I N g N _ BRANCHED AND 6' .I I I �, a Si PLATANUS ACFRIFOLIA'BLOODGOOD'/ 2 1/2"CAL AS 10 STAKE AND GUY FOR ONE GROWING SEASON, I N Z a BLOODGOOD LONDON PLANE TREE B&B SHOWN NURSERY GROWN FOR STREET TREE USE, t • • �f i ll W � l BRANCHED AND C I I -- �--• III' f I I 0 22 N N - 1111t4 '// • •• �I O N co 0= ry 3 PYRUS CALLERYANA'CHANTICLEER'/ 2'DAL AS 4 STAKE AND GUY FOR ONE GROWING SEASON, I =-�— I I T1 rn' ' z n �� CHANfICLfIIt FLOWERING PEAR B k B SHOWN NURSERY GROWN FOR STREET TREE USE. i - I i I9 �I BRANCHED AND 6' I (�I " ,,n DY Z THUJA PUCATA'IXCELS'A'/ 6'-T HL AS 6 STAKE AND GUY FOR ONE GROWING SEASON, i,;. I _ L • - • • Imo ( �_ �� • N'2.n�n _ � -`4 IXCELAS WESTERN RED CEDAR B&B SHOWN NURSERY GROWN,UN-CUT LEADER,FULL -__ i I}= op 4,•Nd,�,- SHRUBS: 1 .-Y"= ci vi E ARBUTUS UNEDO'COMPACTA'/ 36'HT. 4'O.C. 111 FULL AND BUSHY,MATCHED HEIGHT AND FORM E•��„ I --- �% { ' X COMPACT STRAWBERRY TREE MINIMUM O ,____ { V� 0'0,v,,,s4. o V S --- ® HEMEROCAWS HYBRIDS/ 1 GALLON 2.5'O.C. 61 FULL YELLOW FLOWER I •_ ,, A •' { ,'�.GATE\ 1111 `Giii: d,�, DAYULY /,h R+�1�.=-- -. I I I I I 11 J s � IT/ `` z as I MAHONA AQUIFOLIUM/ 36'Hf. 4'O.C. 171 FULL AND BUSHY,3 CANES MINIMUM••_=_-__.— .,(,4(.. /� Q NOREGON GRAPE MINIMUM 4'.B ' I..{. , { _ n S PRUNUS lA1ROCERASUS OTTO IAYKEN'/ 16"-21" 3'O.C. 339 FULL AND BUSHY,MATCHED HEIGHT AND FORM I�"� I I { • 0 '/, ,` rn 0 OTTO LUTIIENN LAUREL �,.,,' (fA v ./ R I GROUNDCOVERS: ":.0 '" c Yl/// ARCTOSTAPHYLOS WA-URSI/ 4'POT 12'D.C. AS REQ'D FULL,HOLD 12"FROM BORDERS F„ y `` KINNIKINNICK I „r \\ \\\ •�, ; _ I .i %/O/' FRAGARIA'UPSTICK'/ 4”POT 12"O.C. AS REQ'D FULL,HOLD 12'FROM BORDERS - - _ _ _ /" �,5"(ON e , '.1i2 LIPSTICK BEACH STRAWBERRY a - ."°�= 1' t L \ E N o • Fi '.;;g.��:r:.�, WAG FLOWo C PET ROSE/ 1 GALLON 2.5'O.C. AS REO'D FULL AND BUSHY,HOLD 16'FROM BORDERS 4',. I41.0 W[... \ i CO N I �L I EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA I J 1 mom mom il • A \1 y \ s,.� 0 .__,..,. .__,-_ _ CHI Sth SHEEr-LCL c\\ :`, \ FS co 1 - P / • ,,.-• 7,-- • RELOCATE EXISTING HEADS J`.. � y 6.j ✓r- -� CO p0J \\� TO NEW CURB UNE . - - y \ ' ''\GF ( 1 z ' II ''',.. ,-17:timiti—rics.11 1 1'=30'-0' RV' ! I' F ' ? 1 �Q Z Z . ,-:\ :� o r s ,..; j .„.‘„,(S\ "�.« •�` • -ass=; I f % P., dflH' fi, + �� P 4 t ?.751 O I :'1 I 'E ] ` i Ii 4 . �--- •� II I (. 114,'' �� I .y V�VE,r2 IUB CHErK S/ '2' •�\ y • ,y 3 0. V O qq .� ,py r--` ,I - �� •All MMIUP r VA•/E IN Ji1M • ci a Z yy, (73 r I '0, Mes7 _ I FIBER G C� Bo vERr - O U ,► `� 1 DDD -1 J I— i - „ _ �o _!I �1• si 2 60 7 f "'K.'''. SIZE, �Nr RKI�►;COD P J V '� ' SPIE/AI•'4'0 TL ST fOF ;3" •P'"' '�< -{` , r " b �1 :`WORKCD La %. S �s-,s \\-\.{\\\\\\\\ C, II II ' • • i{ � 5�' + ulel3 I ` >��" In `O II I{ Ii cur AND CAP obi •�f''E u--.—,,, 7 C I f7G:f r I I hg,V4 (I { LINE FROM EXISTING ALVE-429A f j.r�. I 7 z t•�• Vic;% L II l a - lif,,,i— l'irfi I�—,. —_ 4,i � �i° .� ♦; I I � .S �_ ....:.-� — � � ..'d -�.C.N 3/4'LITERAL LINE f 3 / � T IXI NG 1 1/4'LITERAL I `<j % • I� II II • " • // I Ill ���,� A. y/• • 'NE ''M IXISTIN0 VALVE X22 l r n I • • • • II -+ P.O.C.NEW 3/4'LITERAL UNE / / /, 1 I. 4, rt f r., e O. a {1 J €f{ TO EXISTING 3/4'LATERAL UNE / .O.C,NEW 1 1 2 LATERAL UNE `'� 3 19.<. CV i � .''''''J _I • • t't• • S.E { FROM EXISTING VALVE�29A ./7 EXISTING 1 1/2'LATERAL UNE ' / /,,• W 1 r / FROM EXISTING VAI-VE 421 IX x `10 ' 1 II I f• fli .4,,_•-/ F. , / / / -I _ _ _ _ F----____ �% 'f • 2 W YSTOIiZ_ .�. `'' I, I ii II / I ....,;"r- is€� r`� `�i 47. 1 � /111; 0 J a LI \\ )w— _ -W_ _ _ _._ _ _ _w.4. — —W—— _ •.— _ - _ ,-/ P.O.C.NEW I'LITERAL UNE ��•, ."-- -°-•••••••,...!' J co a r,,,� v I -I{ 7/ — — L w_ Tr _ -W_ _ - - — —W W- --Q -W- - -�-�-..: _ -yy_ _ f 4,/ TO EXISTING 1'LITERAL UNE X f 1.5 O cow V T� II r -W- - / FROM EXISTING VALVE 121 ��" �:, • U • s! ..____ ... sem- 3 ;' �r .ra , , -Il sI ISTING CONTROLLER LOCATION <_' _' t '/4 .1 II • • I I I�—�:^ t�. f j` J�IC 3I 4�,�...... t 3 CI . • L J L �7 t t P / • •°; IOL I © � 1 .7 . I C�vsl�nFo j 1I13 r e�s- �1 i ./ ! ► •I • I \ \C 3 C:» kol1_� =�oJLi =; •� — a _ _ �` •t l I ;r Li •641 ' �— rkl { i 1 v p. c� E• G-u . a3 �' = — ===-11--771' _— —_ a—E. 3 ! I • i : I ZQ o ��14 �4r �� _..117:: O r t I lh�,.' F aR (VALID ONLY VMTH SIGNATURE) I I ' i II __ 3I LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION LEGEND 3 f �* ; O Emil!. I DESCRIPTION 1 L Q I a o 1 $ I SPRINKLER HEADS:TORO 570Z-12P POP-UP FOR SPRAY HEADS SQ/TRW RADIUS L. •y I I H o i I SYMBOL NOZZLE MIN.PSI GPM PRECIP. COVER .--I I t , F I -i I ••o e o e 5702-5 F,T0,TT,H.T,0-PC 30 0.38,0.29,0.25,0.19,0.12,0.09 1.47/1.70 5' fl 'IpII nI /� I 'o b b b 6 b 5702-8 F,TO,IT,H.T,0-PC 30 1.00,0.76,0.70,0.50,0.30,0.24 1.45/1.68 8' 3 E-....--.,....,..„. ..,...,.....-..,..,..,......... ._, '. -•LI.,I I II(I�� 1 I ! ,� x / 1 n ii '4 ll IInI� I ji fi 3 .•e•o• 5702-10 F.TO,TT,H.T,0-PC 30 1.49,1.04,0.97,0.71,0.52,0.40 1.44 1.67 10' 1 II II 1 • y oya� I •• • e•0 570Z-12 F,TO,TT,H.T,0-PC 30 2.19,1.55,145,1.09,0.72,0.50 1.47/1.70 12' I I '1 . --.. .i z I p 6I Q —J I D b F'I.N®570Z-15 F,TO,TL H,T,0-PC 30 3.60,2.60,2.20,1.65,1.10,0.85 1.46/1.69 15' \,�4T,,� _ '�`'� W. 1 ri I ,, Q e� ,9 L_ e u 5702-4 SST,EST-PC 30 0.90,0.45 1.44 4'x30'/15' t� II II I I,•IH , ' 7 �— I ® II; 308-10-02 2 NOZZLE 35 1.44 - 20' .`'.I I v (J U LI L U -LI Li Ii �• �y I I I I 11 -I I .., 016'180 01 1s5 m o ' I IIIJJJ Ll LLLIII LLLIII aI f 12 CD I • BUCKER BPRV SERIES REMOTE CONTROL VALVE,SIZE AS INDICATED ON PLAIDS,TO REMAIN OR REUSE AND INDICTED ON PUNS, t ! _., I z 3 VERIFY LOCATIONS,SIZES,AND WORKING CONDITION ON SITE PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY WORK a:1 I 19 »' 0 vE'i I 3 P.O.C.NEW 1 1/2'LITERAL UNE ' .{ I - N S w' EXISTING IRRITROL MC-24 PLUS-B AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER,PEDESTAL MOUNT,TO REMAIN IN USE,VERIFY LOCATION,SIZE,AND I 1.5 X J. a a OOTO EXISTING 1 1/2'LATERAL UNE I w WORKING CONDITION ON SITE PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY WORK •'.I Ir i I I FROM EXISTING VALVE#19—\ °I 1. e. I — I P.O.C. EXISTING AND TO REMAIN IN USE,VERIFY LOCATION,SIZE,AND WORKING CONDITION ON SITE PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY WORK •-II I �, - • • -.1%._-_,_-1.1t`-_ . —1 y ? } I i ; N w g i rr EXISTING MANUAL GATE VALVE,TO REMAIN IN USE,VERIFY LOCATION,SIZE,AND WORKING CONDITION ON SITE PRIOR TO THE START •• I • • / -� ' .-r"--1 ¢O c� CONZ¢ I OF ANY WORK .•' I I I I 'I 1 t 1• I 1 Z CO[No 0^0 E Fc 3 r LATERAL UNE CUT AND RECONNECTION POINTS AS INDICATED ON PLANS 3 ;-� -==E. �=— - -_ _ /.. 1 I N Q I I z w EXISTING MAINUNE 2 1 2'CLASS 200 PVC PLASTIC PIPE VERIFY LOCATIONS,SIZES,AND CONDITION ON SITE PRIOR TO THE START I I 1 • 3 N u1 ES _---- OF ANY WORK / I Z' _.,...... • • I I Ioj' D I . I • 1 __ ,nzz, NEg,N 6 i' •- 1 1E EXISTING LATERAL CLASS 200 PVC PLASTIC PIPE WITH SCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLVENT-WELD FffRNGS.VERIFY LOCATIONS,SIZES,AND 9`.4 ,•" II • • �I I �II H , v m CONDITIONS ON SITE PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY WORK _ _ I -.O-C.NEW 3/4 LATERAL UNE 11 I ;, !, ' - ".� c0 m DOSING SLEEVING: CLASS 200 PVC PLASTIC PIPE WITH SCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLVENT-WELD FITTINGS,VERIFY LOCATIONS,SIZES,AND �';0 ' TO EXISTING 3/4'LATERAL UNE , ,Q. .' I X o CONDITION ON SITE PRIOR TO THE STMT OF ANY WORK I I FROM EXISTING VALVE 419 r i I _- LATERAL CLASS 205 PLASTIC PIPE,SIZE AS INDICATED ON PUNS,12'COVER I ;,1 - �,A. I C. ,ett /•ON7 S a --- SLEEVING: CLASS 200 PVC PLASTIC PIPE,12'MINIMUM COVER,4'DIAMETER MINIMUM I t'\ -- r^j _', t £ x.1 4 GATE `�' Viii 'A o VALVE STATION NUMBER I II ] t ®®1rI , •w ��{1_jr--) 1 �1 ; % _ 11 z i I O u VQVE GPM • IEi „t % ` # \ p. .�,1F/4 W n �—• i VALVE Et I 1. }...� 7 ' r,_.. \ .^� �',\ O� % �� J V EXISTING LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION TO REMAIN,SAVE,AND PROTECT I 4 ,..• --"- / be 1 1 L :"`, DUSTING LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION TO BE REMOVED AND/OR MODIFIED AS INDICATED ON PLANS r-•.,0 I _ /� \\ i CONS '� 1 1 IRRIGATION SHOWN DIAGRAMATICALLY FOR PLAN CLARITY.COMMON TRENCH MD PLACE EQUIPMENT IN LANDSCAPE; MANIFOLD r" I ---,_-.--- ..- ` •,..�• I. •:-- H I 3 GROUPED VALVES IN ADJACENT SHRUB AREAS WHERE FEASIBLE " ,ON - � EYSV \I q.:....L '1' \ 1 w c) ,„..-.:.,'... \ e J n ="•' 0 RELOCATE EXIS TNG HEADS e \\\®ff_A -• m Q Q .. .r: ®.* _ \ilkk OV A '.. Zio.., - CURB UNE O _ TD NEW 1'=30'-0' i<, �e ___- ...._- - __ �v \\ g co p Z 0 15 30 60 --'-'12.":' -—"'---. - �\ ! R O \G ,r 4 _ dCL'EGS EAS MEtaT # i 41�/ 3\ ., . _ . _ _ PER DOCUMENT -_(� Q - O O = U LJ Q P '. 0- 4410952&t----1 ' m" \ p • .-�Y F- IIS �rlll�r �`\ 'n • ,° g ¢ O O MATCHLINE SEE SHEET L-10 U co 8g x W 6 0 O 0- O U LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION NOTES 0u) 1. PROVIDE A COMPLETE,OPERABLE,AND AUTOMATIC MODIFICATION TO THE EXISTING I j/j,I I :I�iL I,I.II,I,,I�I,I «5LO IRRIGATION SYSTEM FOR ALL NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS IDENTIFIED ON THIS PLAN. —,-.'°• .�• FINISH GRADE I ■1 Z inco �o•• Jo • a WIRE WITH WATERPROOF WIRE Q r 2. VISIT SITE AND VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION COMPONENTS AND P.:o FINISH - - CONNECTOR a z J PAVING SECTION �, _ COVERAGE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK, PROMPTLY NOTIFY THE GENERAL PER CIVIL PLANS GRADE il ' I f1--I- PLASTIC CONTROL VALVE CONTRACTOR OF ANY CONFLICTS OR OBSTRUCTIONS. - COMPACTED BACKFILL 'o O• '8.?: _ 1 SCR PEO ■ I� BOX WITH COVER M (10"DIAz12"MIN.) 3. PROVIDE PROTECTION OF ALL PROPERTY,WORK IN PROGRESS,EXISTING LANDSCAPE °•.." '! 'o• -• SCH 80 SET tilt -III-I I AT 90R DENSITY � •. •. PVC LATERAL AND EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM, ALL DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO �, -_ • - 7 90' ELBOW Illi - - � �"�_ TO SPRINKLERS BE REPAIRED TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS, BEFORE CONSTRUCTION,AT NO ■ _ cis AT 9UC DENSITY ,�b SCH 80 y�9 ADDITIONAL EXPENSE TO OWNER. .- �� 4: — (STRUCTURAL) oppp�.( ,Q• ", NIPPLE PVC LATERAL - • ! •• • ' 4. AT ALL TIMES MAINTAIN IN PROPER WORKING ORDER ALL EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM °-- ° I o• o• Ole.0•••o•" PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE �i O O Q O O•O(�C� AND FEMALE ADAPTOR WIN THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. 6"OFFSET SLEEVE(S) a ••. Qv�`77 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE; _I N ALT.WIRE SLEEVE ' {J o- o 0 0 o BODY CLEAR OF SUMP Q 5. CONNECT NEW IRRIGATION COMPONENTS TO EXISTING IRRINGATION SYSTEM AS REQUIRED. IL na 7o�L"i - w 0 •USE EXISTING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY, IRRIGATION WATER METER,MAINLINE, ETC.AS - PVC MAINURE I 1 C.F.7/8"GRAVEL SUMP W REQUIRED. SEE NOTE 22 BELOW. o Y " d PVC -- �_ . VALVE WIRING -' :i¢ LA- ( MAIN MAINLINENFITTING ._I 3 Q 6. REMOVE EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND COMPONENTS,AS REQUIRED, PRIOR TO NEW 2 e ) 7 �PIPE BED MATERIAL �•�n N SCH 40 SUP TEE O CONSTRUCTION. CAP(WATER TIGHT)ALL MAINUNE, LATERALS,CONTROL WIRES,ETC., i $ ''.'.'.'-✓ TO BE CLEAN&FREE yc\�%,;: I (IJ FOR MODIFICATION AND/OR RECONNECTION. I OAF NO�Z LARGER _ NOTE a 7. OBTAIN AND PAY FOR AU.NECESSARY PERMITS AND I-LES AS REQUIRED BY ,� PROVIDE EXTRA COILS(18")OF EACH WIRE IN VALVE BOX 0 -I Q APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES FOR THIS WORK. ALL WORK TO BE20 FT. 0 NOTE: TAPE WIRE TOGETHER EVERY INSTALLED PER LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS AND MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE MIN.CLEARANCES. MIN.6"DEPTH,7/8"WASHED GRAVEL UNDER EACH VALVE Cl) § Q SPECIFICATIONS. ALL IRRIGATION SLEEVING TRENCH BACKFILL MATERIAL TO BE CLASS COMPACT SOIL AROUND VALVE BOX Q 8. CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL COORDINATION WITH B"OR BETTER(MAX.OF 10%PASSING N0.40 SCREEN)AND BE USE TEFLON OR FL04NABLE SEALANT IN ALL THREADED FITTINGS,PER 0 co COMPACTED TO MIN,95%OPTIMUM DENSITY PER ASTM D-1557-70 MANUFACTURES SPEC S. 03 GENERAL AND SUB-CONTRACTORS AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH THEIR WORK. (MODIFIED PROCTOR) U 9. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE AND VERIFY: SLEEVE/TRENCHING DETAIL REMOTE CONTROL VALVE ASSEMBLY A. 110V ELECTRICAL SERVICE FROM ELECTRICAL SOURCE TO AUTOMATIC NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE CONTROLLER. LL B. EXISTING IRRIGATION/SERVICE METER. C. STATIC WATER PRESSURE AT POINT-OF-CONNECTION (P.O.C.) R" 151f'C CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY OWNER AND BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, i INC.,OF ANY VARIATION IN STATIC PRESSURE OVER 5 PSI GREATER/LESS THAN • • DESIGN PRESSURE. PER MANUFACTURER'S 1". 8"CTR.OF - '"ur .Idel F-D. INSTALLATION OF SLEEVING AS INDICATED ON PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS 12"POP "�■ OBSTRUCTION A O" -O N .) e gilp Q 1 31/14 A 10. ALL WORK PER LOCAL CODES. INSTALLATION PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN SPECIFICATIONS. + FINISH GRADE sC' /=_I1._ \X"' ' • e .•.. ;riga!I;►, ,.11..,1ir PLASTIC VALVE BOX pF ARC' 11. HEAD AND UNE POSRIONING IS DIAGRAMMATIC ON PLAN. ADJUST IN FIELD AS ._ • I i 1I__ I-I, (III_ I (vgUD ONLY WITH SIGNATURE) '10UNTING BRACKET _ _ NECESSARY FOR ADEQUATE COVERAGE. VALVES TO BE POSITIONED ADJACENT TO / •.G I I-I I I- ULCH LAYER _ILII' __�' QUICK COUPLING VALVE - CURBS,IN SHRUB BEDS WHERE POSSIBLE. 1111 TTI l l-I FINISH GRADE • " < < a < •••:(, ,u SPRINKLER1=-111=111 _ ' I 8 i '8 i '' :JJN SENSOR FLUSH WIM SI I-III ADJUST ANGLE AT � 1 C.U.FT.7/8"GRAVEL u, z 12. PROVIDE OWNER WITH TWO(2)SETS"AS-BUILT"DRAWINGS AND OPERATOR'S MANUAL / 1. MULCH UNE -III _I I-III SLOPE COVERAGE . =I SUMP s I UPON COMPLETION. - �= CONDITIONS.50R OF I MOM m SLOPE ANGLE(TYPICAL) .I I- 13. FAMILIARIZE FACIUTY OPERATOR WITH IRRIGATION SYSTEM FUNCTION, CONTROLLEREll SPRINKLER RLIX ' J� MARLIX ELL(TYPICAL) >< PROGRAMMING,SYSTEM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS. SCH BO PVC •� 90' ELBOW .,�;+ w 1=O.0. /J SCH 80 P.V.C.NIPPLE NIPPLE MARLEX -$}po�'�I�A P 8 14. SPRINKLERS ON RISERS WILL NOT ALLOWED. ■ � S ELBOW o /^� m • o E / SCH 40 PVC SXSXT TEE c` E $ c 15, ANTI-DRAIN VALVES TO BE INSTALLED AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT LOW-HEAD RUN-OFF. PVC LATERAL //- SECURE PER MANUFACTURER'S / _ c.8 16. ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE U.L.TESTED AND APPROVED,AND TO BEAR SPECIFICATIONS NOTE: SCH II PVC II / z - MANUFACTURER'S LIMITS PREVAIL FOR TEE SzSzT ■ S = THE U.L LABEL - (SIDE INLET ONLY) `IitOO O NOTE: INSTALLATION AND ADJUSTMENTS. V1 N 17. IRRIGATION SCHEDULING: MOUNT ON WEATHER EXPOSED WALL 8'ABOVE GRADE PROVIDE SWING JOINT RISERS AT WALKS AND CURBS. LU a a 24" FLEXIBLE RISERS ACCEPTABLE ELSEWHERE. M N 'z COORDINATE IRRIGATION SCHEDULE WITH OWNER AND SITE LANDSCAPE MAINTANENCE w LL w COMPANY- RAIN SENSOR DETAIL POP-UP RISER ASSEMBLY QUICK COUPLING VALVE ASSEMBLY 2 M N N p - O N o0 Z¢ 18. SUBSTITUTION OF IRRIGATION MATERIAL/EQUIPMENT TO BE MADE ONLY UPON WRITTEN NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE 00 cci 0)CO K z APPROVAL OF OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. N Q I I w 19. ALL ZONES TO PASS A MINIMUM DISTRIBUTION UNIFORMITY OF 62 PERCENT,AS � NN 6Z \ TESTED THROUGH AS IRRIGATION ASSOCIATION CERTIFIED WATER AUDIT. I-B)U) E 20. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ARE TO BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND IN Y''' F.,PI ACCORDANCE WITH THE CRITERIA.AND STANDARDS OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGLES, AND OTHER APPUCABLE STANDARDS AS OF THE APPROVED DATED OF THESE PLANS. 21. EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND LOCATION OF IRRIGATION COMPONENTS ARE BASED ON 0 ,11, sbd RECORD DRAWINGS BY DAVID BABCOCK&ASSOCIATES LAFAYETTE CALIFORNIA, DATED J NI , I.... o 09/04/02 REVISED 02/25/03. Q "_ e,. v Z 1-9F I 22.IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS ARE BEING CONNECTED ' TO EXISTING OPERATING SYSTEM. NO NEW BACKFLOW d' �� ~ DEVICE SPECIFIED CONTRACTOR TO INSPECT AND d8 o coay� VERIFY EXISTING DEVICES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH F. CURRENT CODES. PROVIDE OWNER WITH SCOPE AND RELATED COSTS FOR NECESSARY UPGRADES. B '' z c if iiitc. r.4 ♦ ARBORIST'S REPORT AND TREE SURVEY Tigard, OR-Costco 7855 SW Dartmouth Road Tigard, OR 97223 ♦ PREPARED FOR Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72nd Avenue Kent, WA 98032 ♦ PREPARED BY Don Richards, President Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. P.O. Box 2355 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 ♦ TREE SURVEY DATES Tree Survey Dates: April 9 and 10, 2013 ♦ REPORT DATE July 1, 2013 Copyright©Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc.2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 1.0 Scope and Limitation of Work 1.1 General 1.2 Timetable 1.3 Engineering Requirements 2.0 Standards 2.1 General 2.2 Reference Standards and Guidelines 2.3 Specifications 3.0 Recommendations 3.1 Tree Protection Zone TPZ 3.2 Compaction Protection 3.3 On Site and Post-Construction Care and Maintenance 4.0 Existing Tree Inventory 4.1 Identification of Existing Trees 5.0 Mitigation 5.1 Replacement of Trees to be Removed 6.0 Qualifications, Assumptions and Limiting Conditions Certification of Arborist's Report and Signatures Photographic Exhibits 1-22 Tree Survey Exhibit Appendix A - Tree Identification Worksheet Appendix B - Tree Canopy Specifications Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. ARBORIST'S REPORT iiitc. r.4 Consulting Arborist's Report and Existing Tree Survey Costco - Tigard, Oregon Prepared For: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72nd Avenue Kent, Washington 98032 Prepared By: Don Richards Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. P.O. Box 2355 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 Certified Arborist Consulting Arborist,ASCA Certified Arborist,ISA#PN-5536A Certified Professional Horticulturist,ASHS Reg. #25543 OCCB#143325 METRO License#6409 July 1, 2013 Copyright©Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc.2013 Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. July 1, 2013 1.0 Scope and Limitation of Work 1.1 General 1.1.1 A request was made by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc., the design engineers for this project, on behalf of Costco Wholesale, for an updated consulting arborist's report containing a tree survey of all existing tree species on the site and an opinion on specifications for existing tree protection and post-construction tree care on this site in Tigard, Oregon. Costco Wholesale plans to develop a portion of this site in to a fuel station. This scope of work shall include reporting of all applicable tree-related requirements for the site as outlined by the City of Tigard's March 2013 Urban Forestry Manual, Sections 5, 7 and 10 describing Title 8-18 inclusive and other applicable titles in the Tigard Municipal Code. 1.1.2 A pre-construction tree inventory was conducted on April 9 and 10, 2013 and includes the location of each tree (regardless of size) on the entire site. Rights-of-Way trees, such as those along the Highway 217 off ramp to Highway 99W and those in the designated Tree Grove within the Sensitive Lands area just south of the site that were physically separated from the development areas were not inventoried. No tree removal or construction is scheduled for or allowed in these areas. The tree inventory includes the genus and species of each tree, the current size of each tree measured in DBHI, and all other pertinent or special tree information associated with this project. 1.1.3 All the trees that were inventoried were in good condition, healthy and thriving on the site except 25. Two trees are dead and the other 23 are covered in ivy, with no top or trunk damaged. These trees are identified on Appendix A, Tree Survey. 1.1.4 Two trees are marked in memoriam, 1 with a plaque and 1 with a stone monument. 1.1.5 Fifteen trees are street trees along Dartmouth Road. 1 DBH is diameter at breast height measured 4.5' above mean ground level. Costco Wholesale-Tigard, Oregon 1 Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. July 1, 2013 1.0 Scope and Limitation of Work (continued) 1.1 General (continued) 1.1.6 There were a total of 492 trees of assorted species and sizes on the entire site excluding the right-of-way trees along the west property boundary and the trees south of the site in the designated tree grove and sensitive lands area. Fifty-two trees are scheduled for removal. Fifty trees are scheduled for removal as a result of development. Two trees are already dead. Only 3 of these 52 trees are 6" DBH or larger. This meets the requirement of retention for existing tree canopy, thereby requiring no mitigation as a result of tree removal. 1.2 Timetable 1.2.1 A timetable for completion of our part of the project was confirmed as the week of July 1, 2013. 1.3 Engineering Requirements 1.3.1 The project engineers will need to provide a tree dripline plan to scale for all existing trees 6" DBH or larger using the spread specifications for each tree's current size as described on Appendix A. 1.3.2 The project engineers will need to provide a tree canopy plan to scale for all existing trees 6" DBH or larger (103 live trees) using the spread specifications for each tree's mature size as described on Appendix B. 1.3.3 The project engineers will provide a tree removal plan to scale for all existing trees 6" DBH or larger (3 trees) within the construction zone. I also recommend showing where the remaining 50 trees will be removed even though they are smaller than 6" DBH and 2 trees are already dead. 1.3.4 The project engineers will need to provide a tree protection fencing plan to scale for all existing trees 6" DBH or larger within 50 feet of the construction zone. Costco Wholesale-Tigard, Oregon 2 Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. July 1, 2013 2.0 Standards 2.1 General 2.1.1 Research and documentation for this report and the attachments consists of: 1) A measurement of trees identified on the site by size; 2) An identification of trees on the site by common and botanical names; 3) A visual inspection of trees on the site for quality and general health prior to construction including photographic exhibits representing the types and sizes of trees identified in the tree survey; 5)A numeric rating (0-3) for condition; 6)A numeric rating (0-3) for preservation; 7)A mathematical calculation of existing canopy; 8) A review of applicable tree protection specifications, all the applicable titles from the City of Tigard's March 2013 Urban Forestry Manual; 9) Recommendations for pre-construction tree preservation; 10) Recommendations for post-construction tree care; and 11) A drawing indicating the trees that were surveyed by number. 2.2 Reference Standards and Guidelines 2.2.1 Measurements for this report are based on the American Standard for Nursery Stock, revision ANSI Z60.1-2004 and the National Arborist Association Standards for Tree Measurements, ninth edition. 2.2.2 Common and Botanical names referred to in this report are based on vernacular currently used to describe similar goods or products in the national nursery industry and correspond to plant names and listings found in Hortus III, Fourth Edition, 2004. 2.2.3 Plant protection criteria used in this report are based on best management practices adopted for use by the American Society of Consulting Arborists and the International Society of Arboriculture as found in Trees and Development, A Technical Guide To Preservation Of Trees During Land Development, 1998. Costco Wholesale-Tigard, Oregon 3 Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. July 1, 2013 2.0 Standards (continued) 2.2 Reference Standards and Guidelines (continued) 2.2.4 The reporting format used to present the findings in this document follows the current guidelines found in Guide To Report Writing For Consulting Arborists, 1995. 2.3 Specifications 2.3.1 Specifications for existing tree protection and retention are based on information gathered during the site evaluation conducted on April 9 and 10, 2013. 2.3.2 Additional specifications used for tree protection will be developed from information contained in the reference Trees and Building Sites, 1995. 2.3.3 Tree Retention: Observations of quality were made during the site inspection and all of the trees surveyed for retention are of sufficient quality to warrant protection unless otherwise noted. A total of 440 trees2 are scheduled for preservation from the 492 total trees surveyed. Two trees are already dead. One hundred three live trees to be preserved are 6" DBH or larger. Twenty-three trees are of poor quality. 2.3.4 Tree Removal: The recommendations for tree removal and tree retention are based on the proposed development plan drawings submitted as part of the permit application. A total of 50 live trees3 are scheduled for removal as a result of development. Three of these trees to be removed are 6" DBH or larger. Two additional trees are scheduled for removal that are already dead. 2 Refer to Tree ID Worksheet,Appendix A. 3 Refer to Tree ID Worksheet,Appendix A. Costco Wholesale-Tigard, Oregon 4 Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. July 1, 2013 2.0 Standards (continued) 2.3.4 Tree Removal (continued) 1) Based on the growth habits of the existing tree species, it may be common to encounter large subsurface roots outside the "Tree Protection Zone" TPZ defined under section 3.1. It will be important to avoid damaging these large (> 3" diameter) subsurface roots during excavation. If subsurface roots are encountered during excavation, the excavation should stop and the consulting arborist should be contacted. 3.0 Recommendations 3.1 "Tree Protection Zone" TPZ 3.1.1 Delineation of the "Tree Protection Zone" TPZ shall be established as a minimum distance equal to the same area affected by existing development or up to 15-25 feet from each tree as defined by the drip line determined during initial observations made on April 9 and 10, 2013. This TPZ shall be marked using a minimum 5-6 foot high, chain link metal fence secured by steel posts driven in the ground 2 feet deep on 10 foot centers around all trees to remain within 25 feet of the construction zone. Tree protection fencing shall be installed prior to commencement of construction and shall remain in place until completion. A note that clearly informs all site contractors about the necessity of preventing damage to the trees shall be affixed to the fence and incorporated on all final plan drawings. 3.1.2 Trees physically separated from the proposed development areas, such as those on the other side of the north entrance road, those behind the existing black metal fencing in the raised bed along the north entrance road, or those behind adequate curbing, do not require tree protection fencing. Trees in individual tree wells, such as those in the parking lot, require fencing only within the confines of the existing tree wells. 3.1.3 A construction drawing identifying the actual location of the tree protection fencing must be provided by the client with the final permit application documentation. Costco Wholesale-Tigard, Oregon 5 Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. July 1, 2013 3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS (continued) 3.1 "Tree Protection Zone" TPZ (continued) 3.1.4 TPZ's physically separated from the proposed development areas or more than 50 feet from any of the proposed development areas do not require tree protection fencing. 3.1.5 The TPZ shall be protected at all times from chemicals and contaminants, which may be injurious to the root systems of trees. 3.1.6 The TPZ shall be protected at all times from excess water, mud or debris that may accumulate as a result of construction and soil excavation. 3.1.7 The TPZ shall be protected at all times from erosion or sediment depositing as a result of construction and soil excavation. 3.2 Soil Characteristics 3.2.1 Soil types and their anticipated affect on tree establishment and longevity and proposed methods for improvement. 1) Soils information has been taken from the geotechnical report dated February 14, 2011 created by Kleinfelder West, Inc. specifically for this site.4 2) Soil pH was found to be relatively neutral at 6.4 Mv, Sulfate levels were found to be low at 64.9 ppm and no Chloride was detected. 3) The site is underlain by silt and clay with variable amounts of fine sand. These soils are moisture sensitive and will be suitable for planting during dry weather only. They may require drying, which is typically not practical at an operational warehouse site. I recommend a provision for importation of high loam content fill and exportation of on-site construction debris. The moisture contents of the clay, sandy clay, and silt were about 30 percent and particle sizes were typically low to medium. 4 Geotechnical Report for the Costco Site located at 7855 SW Dartmouth Avenue in Tigard, OR 97006 by Marcus B. Byers, P.E. On February 14, 2011. Costco Wholesale-Tigard, Oregon 6 Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. July 1, 2013 3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS (continued) 3.3 Compaction Protection 3.3.1 The TPZ shall be protected at all times from compaction and mechanical tamping as a result of construction and soil excavation. 3.3.2 No machinery will be allowed in the TPZ of the trees to be retained during excavation, unless approved by the consulting arborist. Soil excavation outside the TPZ is expected to be accomplished mechanically. Any roots that may be exposed outside the TPZ should be uncovered by hand and removed using a saw with a clean cut at an angle perpendicular with the growth of the root by a qualified tree care company. No roots within 25 feet of the TPZ shall be removed using excavation or construction equipment. 3.3.3 If machinery is required to enter the TPZ during construction or excavation, a protective pad must be established over the soil surface prior to entry for purposes of weight distribution and compaction prevention. The options for soil surface covers are, 1) installation of 'A" steel plating over the soil surface adequate for weight distribution of the equipment to be used; or 2) installation of 1/4" steel grating over the soil surface adequate for weight distribution of the equipment to be used. 3.4 On Site and Post-Construction Care and Maintenance 3.4.1 If required by City Code, the consulting arborist or his representative may be on site with 48 hours notice after tree protection has been installed and prior to any excavation or tree removal to insure compliance with the specifications outlined in this report. 3.4.2 Visits to the site by the consulting arborist may also be required by City Code every two weeks during the excavation and construction phase of the project. The consulting arborist shall retain a log of all visits to the site. These additional on-site visits may be provided for an additional fee. Costco Wholesale-Tigard, Oregon 7 Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. July 1, 2013 3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS (continued) 3.4 On Site and Post-Construction Care and Maintenance (continued) 3.4.3 Post-excavation and construction care of the trees to be retained shall include, but not be limited to; pruning of limbs and branches that appear to have been impacted as a result of excavation or construction activities for a period of two years after completion of the project. Fertilization and irrigation adequate for the proper health and maintenance of the trees equal to or greater than that which existed prior to excavation and construction shall be maintained for two years after completion of the project and; pest management if trees show serious pest infestation resulting from excavation or construction activities for a period of two years after completion. 4.0 Tree Inventory 4.1 Identification of existing trees 4.1.1 The existing tree inventory with sizes and ratings is as follows... 1) See the attached Tree ID Worksheet identified and attached as Appendix A. 2) See the attached Canopy Spread Worksheet identified and attached as Appendix B. 4.2 City inventory requirements 4.2.1 Following documentation of compliance with the urban forestry plan by the project arborist or landscape architect for each lot or tract, the city shall collect spatial and species specific data for each open grown tree and area of stand grown trees for inclusion in a publicly accessible inventory of trees. 4.2.2 Prior to any ground disturbance work, the applicant shall provide a fee to cover the city's cost of collecting and processing the inventory data for the entire urban forestry plan. 4.2.3 No establishment bond will be required since the trees are either existing or the newly planted trees will be used to meet canopy requirements. Costco Wholesale-Tigard, Oregon 8 Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. July 1, 2013 5.0 Mitigation 5.1 Replacement of trees to be removed 5.1.1 Replacement or mitigation of the trees scheduled for removal due to their proximity to the construction zone, grade changes or other Tree Code reasons are not required because only 3 of the trees are 6" DBH or larger and the overall tree canopy is not being reduced beyond the allowed percentage. However, City Development Codes may require tree planting as part of their development requirements under the headings of landscape and screening, parking lot canopy enhancement or street tree planting. 6.0 Qualifications, Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 6.1 Qualifications Mr. Richards is a consulting arborist under certification with ASCA, American Society of Consulting Arborists and the ISA, International Society of Arboriculture with certification number PN5536-A, and a Certified Professional Horticulturist under certification with the American Society for Horticultural Science with License number 25543, he is licensed by the State of Oregon as a contractor under license number 143325 and by METRO under license number 6409. Mr. Richards is a member in good standing with all of these organizations and is therefore qualified to perform this consultation. 6.2 Assumptions Any legal descriptions provided to the consultant are assumed to be correct. Any titles and/or ownerships to any property or services are assumed to be true and accurate. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character. It is assumed that the property is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes, or other governmental regulations. Costco Wholesale-Tigard, Oregon 9 Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. July 1, 2013 6.0 Qualifications, Assumptions and Limiting Conditions (continued) 6.2 Assumptions (continued) Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable and up to date sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible; however, as the consultant, Mr. Richards can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. Information provided by the client in association with this consultation is assumed to be correct and accurate to the best of their knowledge. 6.3 Limiting Conditions The limited use of this report is to offer an existing conditions analysis in regards to the trees on the site and best management practices for existing tree protection and post construction maintenance by the client in performing their tasks in relation to development of this property. As the consultant, Mr. Richards has not been asked to render any opinions legal in character. Mr. Richards is not an attorney. This report is not intended as, and does not represent legal advice and should not be relied upon to take the place of such advice. Although every effort has been made to assure the accuracy of the information included in this report as of the date which it was issued, laws, court, and arbitration decisions and governmental regulations in the United States and Oregon are all subject to frequent change. Current information is to be included in all the standards and duties of evaluation, investigations, interpretations, methodology and contradictions in determining the failure for claims and litigation. As the consultant, Mr. Richards may be asked to give testimony or to attend meetings with the City's Development Review or Planning Commissions by reason of this report for an additional fee. Costco Wholesale-Tigard, Oregon 10 Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. July 1, 2013 6.0 Qualifications, Assumptions and Limiting Conditions (continued) 6.3 Limiting Conditions (continued) Loss or alteration of any part of this report or its attachments may invalidate the entire report. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed without prior written or verbal consent from the consultant. Neither all nor part of the contents of this report, nor copy thereof, shall be conveyed by anyone, including the client, to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media, without the prior, expressed, written or verbal consent of the consultant - particularly as to conclusions, identity of the consultant, or any reference to a professional society or institute or to any initialed designation conferred upon the consultant as stated in the qualifications listed. This report and any information expressed herein represents the opinion of the consultant, and is in no way contingent upon a stipulated result, the occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon any finding to be reported. Costco Wholesale-Tigard, Oregon 11 Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. July 1, 2013 CERTIFICATION OF REPORT I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: The statements of facts contained in this report are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. I have no undisclosed interest in the trees that are the subject of this report. I have no bias with respect to the trees that are the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. My engagement in this assignment is not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. The compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined direction that favors the cause of the client, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. The analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this appraisal report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and subject to review by their respective, duly authorized representatives. The tree preservation and removal site plan meets all of the requirements Section 10, part 1 of the City of Tigard, Oregon March 2013 Urban Forestry Manual. The tree canopy site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10, part 2 of the City of Tigard, Oregon March 2013 Urban Forestry Manual. The supplemental report meets all of the requirements in Section 10, part 3 of the City of Tigard, Oregon March 2013 Urban Forestry Manual. Costco Wholesale-Tigard, Oregon 12 Applied Horticultural Consulting, Inc. July 1, 2013 SIGNATURES I certify by my signature that I am the project arborist and tree risk assessor: Don Richards, President, .AHC, Inc. <=> Do.y ,cis PN-5536-A Arborist's Name and Title Arborist's Signature and ISA Cert. Number P. O. Box 2355. Lake Oswego. OR 97035. Ph: (503) 756-5198. Email:don@aDDliedhort.com April 9 and 10. 2013 <=> July 1. 2013 As-Of Date for Inspection Date of Final Report I'N-553 t Costco Wholesale-Tigard, Oregon 13 EXHIBITS PHOTO EXHIBITS Photographic Exhibits Costco Wholesale - Tigard, Oregon plio 04 %�J Honeylocust - S. Entrance Corner Median RIO 11, thi.k, ,,, 4 04.,jely V J 1111 Scar et Oak, Honeylocust and Red Maple - S. Entrance Exhibit 1 Photographic Exhibits „' , I. • �e. t • r a ,��,(ifar r^'. ! ,‘ ,,. ..,,, • ., `.,.t.. elf AJr. �" • yt r, .. .. .. • lit I 1 Western Red Cedar - E. Property Boundary - Dartmouth Road a P t dG yy {r 1 1 awe Western Red Cedar - E. Property Boundary - Dartmouth Road Exhibit 2 Photographic Exhibits /k �J 1 k n �` y 4 r k✓' +R • `- 1 G '1hrF A $` • .7,_ iii it. w rk -5 Vt •Z1. a�yr s+ oaf y y' , dit� Y-d4 SII! (!\ r, r : • .a.P. Mme,. # _ F �: Vine Maple, London Planetree and Purple Leaf Plum - E. Property Boundary - Dartmouth Road IF 5 y A/ Vy, ,i,It',0%,• ;.0, ‘\ V 7 h Iff \',t'Y VP Ai 4'55,i 4 '')jit h Y k -:.� apt —,.i '1 lei � 1 liik, .. it tui IA l,-,i,, i--h1 hh1h 11: "IIIii1110 A" eP i #? Flowering Pear and London Planetree - N. Entrance Exhibit 3 Photographic Exhibits \ I ; , 1 41E4 4,C1 J N•lk• k‘. i w'r fli 1"/ ‘Alitlif://' fr i , \ N s:: Irdkr• IIIII 1' i/ ' 1 . Nte, - ' 1V "710TA'. \ y,fl i : 11„0", r -,I,11...• - ; . ,... 6,11s 9 ,_ y ,-- 54,...,. > , ,....I It 1 ' Nm... ...1 .,_. ;,..gl A A 4 Green Ash - Lot N. Parking 4.,. , ,.. ,• . , 4). 4,,,,,,* ...- , ... .... ,, , ..i.....,,i.. .v.,g A :„ r • , , 4 .,..0.a 1' '*,‘ ' '"' ) .',.1!:;',617.4:- :!.'1' :.,1. • -'''.;\•.---., „,--`;',-0-i-,itazitylafillarr4. --.'''-„-'‘'. ,•,Ii;‘.,/.„.4.t:i41,.--,,4,%,.',/ -'., ,ligirii4k.,':j'. r,.--- ,,,, ,. 78 . lin Xv: 04 V ;,7.;,,,,,:-IIAT,..-' ' ktvi • k,44 !k4r-I a • .4 ..- ,i0fi --- -.4 i ' .., -"---s'— -— . .- igr.,:z2--.-7- ''s - • %.% w— -., -,-........i.,-40 um. I It? * 7= Alai - - 1 1 riblimmmilliF' allirillr..., • Lot - Scarlet Oak - NE. Parking Dartmouth Road Exhibit 4 Photographic Exhibits :�4ti — ',,jK4 7-,.-4-A Vii_. . ,, ..„,k,'„ ,,, , ......k , , :, ,,,.,:,„_:,./ ',Jr lipit,_. „' , ,,,,.v , Q_®i ei 11 '!P �. .. , „ , _ y 15, __- - @�! ^�. .may"ate '/ ii .r a MNIII II Honeylocust - NE. Parking Lot - Littleleaf Linden - Street Trees Along Dartmouth Road r . - 1611111111.1111L-- - Red Maple - N. Parking Lot Exhibit 5 Photographic Exhibits l x�A€ ^� y� "`�v,3 p� cif Q om '" �!§':°ita3. w ) v y , r JIN{Y I. > 11*. .,`�"k kx � ' .-Y-3c _ y 4�. � -IP•-*4._44.141:*-44 ,14PIOVIO z".a 14f4kiait' %III M f . } Yf ''',\*trfriftk k;1111.6 - fr-1.. t,"---,, '4 " ,..,.__,, , :,....„„vs,,,,, v �4d� 1h �a r�'� �. - --- r ,„ 4 • -•� Y •.L r 'Ate , y, �,,,s� 7 ,,. ! 14 5..----- -.f1'`.` S. 3 a °r 9Y r� it I- ., INW .' Red Alder - S. Parking Lot . fl P. . N ` \ ..14,141 I 161 1 r Ott Big Leaf Maple - S. Parking Lot Exhibit 6 Photographic Exhibits ,fii r � 55 p Sy r� ,;,7:,-,',:z>P d- '-` , . -- 44 .r-e.-...3:'....2 i.i x d rat !,,t,� C „3' .-Ay?:.'.''.k�._ t J. ,� ��. l y Oregon Ash - S. Parking Lot " - U x.1,19 it-,*, . ' '- ' s .�r e �}'.„."b> !` f�"is „- sd `da e ,, ' d � R ^ {� ] 3 f 3i 4 y i�A1 Q F \ �� "`' �v J�./Yt �,�.�s,. --'".. �-asf� � :d��. ^�,u ^�e� -�_�'— � ---- am ,_ ,_ London Planetree - W. Parking Lot Exhibit 7 Photographic Exhibits i A .44p. • ilk Writ" , ,, '„- 14,4,,t,.1„ ' ! ,.�. a \ 5, II 41 fib" 4' .;\ a ,....,,,, r it'�4"�' • , kk r 8%; 4 ! 44 & 1,--,.,6-,41,1 irAiRO 11� _y ,i„.-, .„,,---,-. 'fir,. ,,,,,.,,,,4,,,,,00 ,.,,,.,3„,,,,,- w Q 3 ¢} y \q4 „^l�A i��,tr. .ulf+lB' rs. d1 ,.£ ", u9�9�. �6,. ;: Y {'ate i.=`,., 1' ..'.. sM � ' .mss �,.. �� . rt Scouler's Willow - W. Parking Lot ,,..„,,,,,, ,, , „: v.,-,„„_,, ,., ,, ..„„,L 4.1,,„, _ ,,,,, - ,, . .„,1 .1 �_ �' e �1,1,/, ,,:'� gyp.Aslitz.,,, ' P .4,4,....,.. 7, � � ��. 9, ,.�'Y F� � �I ,/:.#4,:i'',`,',� r r sou y '� �^ - I ll i � v r nidal rtl, � �: C,v i \ ifu: E 3I� 4 e I, - - ' - ;id-,.../ ,,. ''''1. ' '"it.,:g 417,',.-.."'"g4'ti','"'‘,., - ' ",-01,.„,.. , "' Flowering Crabapple - W. Parking lot Exhibit 8 `.V�Photographic Exhibits hibits 1 $1 lill'4 t., i,4 ' ,14. * ,,k4- 04' a ; _ x � 0 Aft 44 I "�;„ z � r.,c �� }y am, 4' i &7 a�'3 - n 'd ' A 1JZ",, Y, sMter y iAtY� s i ti;. ' — " '--. • '..°x. te,. s'S," � ¢ ;. '� � .1 Weeping Cherry - W. Parking Lot '' 4. ) 4";t4 _ V,:kikt 'ts,4;10,to•I IrIV qi 1 l— - gixt,r 0r r Jnr„ Red Maple - NW. Parking Lot Exhibit 9 Photographic Exhibits e -17_ : �9/r =x '. d ♦ �" ';', X5'1��1t-101 y '4'4 p "" {4 y to 1 J i .,'t4:t .. J yl�- ,. X5 irk `�� '�ilj� :; 0.2_ .,_,,, ,..... ._,...s.,,,,,:i -_. '.,..-;:-=_,,...,,,' t . Ir 2+, y ii�;Y-'4,15',;.: li°yy _ _ ...AI1lIF Bi" F S ' 1 } '10;5x"F' 7"--;4';'' "-- fir. It � Norway Maple - N. Property Boundary Y I ' ti ( 'rt,- -" ti�4,ar ,? , If o. yea i 4 Mgr ,.me S; / r Irr a 1i 1 i 11 _ ,3t c ilk .l p Green Ash - NW. Parking Lot Exhibit 10 Photographic Exhibits 14.r.-.,471,,';4-'^‘:.,=4.,,,(-4,7' r 4,7' t� -J� t ! la . .-\``,4;,'il '; 1":„.i.' '.,--,1:',..,,',-4.,,s-4.4 'r .':;'-'4r,:-A''''',$j' )%' '....,,-'4:1 ,,., ';' `'..ir -,,,,,ste ' 34,..4.-,4,4:-.',' ,,Y'r,,,,,,a::0 7,,,,-k- 7,,,.;,' ' -' ..., ' ...-4,' ,,.. -%1.4.A-;,,.V '-'4 ,, . ' •/,''''vYkliit k'A,\I''' ''';`1,17.-:i Plq"4-4',#!1',4'41,,, 7---=- -, r: 4FN , '1/4,1 e-',::-.,,_ - • - 't t . ,. *17111:-; a« , , y '. rrx-_ x--4';'. 4'. '-'-'4,..,-41,- fip *1' -', '0'4 'v+✓ , ' -x y1 .-c � gz4S . �,-,-.: r "}v it -�� 4 's ,t"b. 5, x `ti•' ) h a. h . av' y rI� +4 �i"Yto . . / � p ' �P( -tt ry,, 1C +t«> r ( 4,-,1,::,1,7,44:44,,,, Y,,„4 'S7"%3.'t e . ki," t f �'ti '012,01,..!,,7 , i'.,,,,k,;: 4_ 3' 3. Vine Maple - N. Property Boundary , r t:.=; N * .411 .. * _ 1/fIt*F "i F`t .„44:", y k Y y. S 37' f S 4 ,� ! 'OM1 $Q , : sem: 7 ., wall de -:t" 5 -' 1',,, {{gy�pp ' 5711: ': ,yq t I .�.. , `. — I " . sib 1�� _ — Purple Leaf Plum - E. Property Boundary - Dartmouth Road Exhibit 11 Photographic Exhibits . . •• 1 ,R *e eo�. i r v �, ::$4101t IP .' �t ••' t; v.i..? viimit .} .. e.e . '*4\4 -. ',4i, '"' • Y fi= Scarlet Oak - N. Parking Lot 1 a 2 1 i R tit Y-- ',• .:- .,-"f.-04/11:51111,- i,l'',-..s" ts t � r ,_r;,..,_!;, t,4 � cfx .,/ .: -...7 .„ -.._:,.. ..-..:11,r,,,,,---.,:f.,.., . ...,-.4.,:,. ,- ..:,.As, .F..---....,:__.:3.4-, .;.--v.-A-1,-,:r. r4 t j rir Y v1 , ;FleP jos r Canada Red Chokecherry - W. Parking Lot Exhibit 12 Photographic Exhibits ' • l- . _ 'f "_i� 4F : y r� � Fix • - r_ " ' x- - Limber Pine - N. Property Boundary i'., r ay,O'y, —---______ - - ..‘,,r.,.1F-, 5..sti.,._ ..sr .,,,,,: : 4,11., .,&,. *.,-. 44 t ' 7 . .a' r Via: . ��' ! w �'4 gkc. ___ _ ___ °AFa` 4_4 tr L __ ,,,___ _ __,______ ___ I _ ._ .._ . 1.#, _._ , Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn - S. Parking Lot Exhibit 13 Photographic Exhibits -:''' '4K'''''/.;',1 -',:-V;-,.:7- '-'-**".-!--., ,----- "..',..1`,.',A"'-'a',--.-'-';', ...-:. ., '.',, ,-f,.,„,,,ifr:44,,Y,'..‘, .:.,-..,-*4,'''.,.!:„'-)t't:i.,,'. *,,;...,-_0,,,,r,,,,,,.?17,,.:-ii,7)4?fes I;. .o r � i es z .-, g fie` 's � :+w`"y a55/¢f -: ws�- =,,N,.- ' 4, , t �� ;4: " 1 ; ., 1 r w''' • : 11 r r` 4 is a , r� , s�t� — C t i z'b"`tea rs k , ' 'kf °vim 1 yy ::,...,--'4.::.S ✓ '".'- _. "* a WM Western Hemlock - S. Parking Lot }� t ?f,-.'7'..4,-.,.-• -.1 ' 4 k. R (f y - .' :-:,,lit,--7....:.- ' ''' ,.r."..i."0'c:/, '''.'.ii''''.i";;' '1• 71' 447f4 ��t s a �� q �k $kt ec �` A .�. h . 2 � 4 , .l rdv 7r t Bur Oak - S. Parking Lot Exhibit 14 Photographic Exhibits d� w3�Y Y d e ,t' ti� Sf ,.jxts a°+ } sN'k.,.- ',,,,,,,_,:..3.::.k.:. •I'fl'•-°;MYIA)., 'f., rf.r-A:41.ii*--Tfiq'14,0!'- '4,-:i''''''''714.*;:‘:' ' �' Tr cry. 6 e�.`,� 1y b'r L � ,: .,}� 1-, 33 -, ;:114010'.4;14,:::.!-#—, r r.;eel ' �, '� J'.Rrt� �,1W. v ' i ., .- 4 �Wk° "�� x T .ri, .r II iaR sv, --T,� L n L* Bitter Cherry - N. Property Boundary .':---1:-.:'i.1,*4.,,t,.: -, i1 *' v tt'„—',".,:'..'..:„:.4114:,-0-,. , . , te t $ .t'1:::‘-';':,-,-.,-:-.•-.. ..., ..,,,,,_.2.; ti ,f ,4">, n" r k fl ,y ' $ - r ,-,,' ':4 ; — .....:.. . ,,,,,40*-7,.-.* ,,,..4-,‘,,,A, } P 4: `meg :1 4i E ' L I 111,1111.1111r- 4.'":'-''',1,-.'''-4;.-,..?*::';',''''';43 . ' . f Flowering Pear - N. Entrance Median (With Plaque) Exhibit 15 Photographic Exhibits Cit ♦ 3w 'C•` q y�. . a r� 1 /.ci'•--...I. it,,,) - • •• le+ •r,•,•nrc''i g'li.. Air,'T •r' • • ,-.-•1 .•••,,, ,- . r � . --�:j I. a� ¢� I- awe :t-•••,--3i-' ' -.�I i ! .sJ �� �r�J�ti .��',il ;, 1�.. `` sr -r? ii ,.mi J! 1 r r A; 4.:,,,_,,,,.,,, ,i .... t1 ( � ,iri*,94:,,,... 1 es s 1:: r - i -4,-. : _,. ::5041:114k,, , :., ? , . . . P-•41 is • t i Ya c vir•. s4 * i Flowering Pear - N. Entrance Median (Plaque) rrAA ' _, i/./ a ..4 , , ...,. . , ..„._ ‘,. ,.,,,,,„ ,.,.. . .„:„,,,.......„,..;.,„/„. „.. ...,,...,,,‘,,,,,,,,, ., ,,.,.,,..... „.„ ,,„,..:.:,. ._ ___ Nkett..vt.„, ,. , c-,101111V-ht, ,. i 5x' ,..:,...5.::::,41%,,,,, f4 �k,�° h � Yls .. Ailliii Honeylocust - NW. Parking Lot (With Monument) Exhibit 16 Photographic Exhibits 1111 A , 0„1. ',,•", ;Tt,Yrs,'.5 •',r ,--''',4•-2:-POrde 4 —— , .. Vt4 '''''•. ,,r e,",,?:?.--, 1-"r) '4'1%, N., ill • k , ' ' 4 ,,,Iti:;e01 ,• 'v 1,;., :- - . .4.',,',',`,7,, • -, -' - --- ta, - ,- . ' ..),,, 7 - ,,, it, Nti.,- --1,,,...„ - '''''''.: '----,':.-Z.--'''•---?OW','• ' . ,'' . . - 4r,' ,; 4.:,'.',,,lk_. , ..t'It )2 \.').,'''Ot•",--rN ''' -- ;;-1-',:'• '''• '''''4'''''''''-"•''' 7.' .17''.-"t•••-4:‘ ' A --' -''. ,/,4,-- ,,,,-ti;.1.:‘,',"•-• - ''''. -----•- , ,}..7.'ri.,-'1,------;-_---;:--- -`'-'--c ` I '-- } =.i -#'''' ---''''-*-••.---",!:%V.4' ,,-„. l•-:,,...-• - --:-- -: ---;•:--1',-;,,,471,-;17,.•-iii.4%::-•Y't';1-?,'.:A_ ,',,,-e ' ,5------ ---,,e_o''',",t;'-'47,,...;,:. '''' . -- ,..+ ^:,--,,C''S.?•\'"1,00 .44, -',.---7;,- '''.--"..'1,-/rf;' ,-- - 14-'''\l',--'-;':' '75;1;',);ritt',., , :''--,.:4-4 - '',-;-!,,(A..-ik..--kt, ''-.44-';•j---t?-^ii-,:;,":'_-,''''', "-‘;''''''.---- •4-:'''' ),;-?-'•,i,---.:j:1:'''./2e-4;/14;11" 'i. ;',,i',;/.:4-: -4.: ------cal..;:,''-f..-7:42°-1,'Iele*,-,..',::4•_',k,-:',.._;,.'s.:,-,;'.z.7,1 r'''.,,_ -„..-.,- ,-.----- 1-''''";-,,,,-,1".- t) 10 ti,,,,,. .,_ ,,,,. ,,,-„..7, _,,,.. (,:ifi*, 4 -•:;_,.--,,,,,,, ,,,-4, .-7_7--..".4_.-",;?..: --,,,,-",.V--N. -r''''-'",.. •'` '- if Honeylocust - NW. Parking (Monument)'4 ;/, ,,_-, y-l-i./,z, --"‹,,t1,--fv-)':•,,,' t'''.';'t'' .1-'''''''''''- :',...-•-i,,,,-:::,-*.„,-; ---,-,,,,,,,..„4-- Lot k---. _ mo i r ' ,,;•':n _73..-.....•:'',- •=4":^";,': ---- tre;,,,-43*;:'4,...., 4,-•. '1,‘,:',.--,44.1 ,4,-:"=", — ' ' - :2.4;,',7.1`,;,4*".,,,,,,,pr-A:, ' • ,, , 11,4- NEMMNNIOM — S ".....-...„.4ver _ Deodar Cedar - S. Parking Lot Exhibit 17 1 Photographic Exhibits k�I v..t.,,,i.,,, .. t ,..4.. Y ,-.:,,,..„4....,,,,r4,,;:*,,,,,-.....* p; F r''B y � � *Yr W 7w1r i _' #,: 1 Qi'4-r ,+,t „,,,..,,,,, , , . , , , ,,,-,-., ,L,-,,.;,_-:;7, -,...,ftylr.„4:- ,...:1,,,,,..,z, ,,..,ri,;,--.,1 • �: - - _ _ _ Western Red Cedar - W. Parizing Lot Ceols i i Atlas Cedar - N. Along Building Exhibit 18 Photographic Exhibits y4 - I / li,elf....,''N 9' • f i ,„4,,, ... s.,,, •r � .. - i+,' gi p. 2 . - c � •�'4ew t. ` ?.aims = z`"-'�, v�/ o 'i ,, s; tri• Douglas Fir - N. Property Boundary r• APOIr \ - • Austrian Pine - N. Property Boundary Exhibit 19 Photographic Exhibits s;, -,,, .1•- 1 -). ' ' , -,•,.:;,',f- i,",:•.: : ,,,,- ,, , ..-.••,/,,,, Vet&l - . Q 1 , Milli ,t *"1.. ''' •'''•-•,• ' • . , , . • • , , ',''. i 6,,-,n•'.,'iexpi,C,,,,,ft.-;-...,: •,;:,.•••V",/,•-----,,,jc.,,,--i-,,,,t..., . .. '',... ...7 ' ;,il''..::.,,;140A0..s1::--N,-,- ,,,•,••-i.,‘,t,''',,, ' • , , -.-4•7:1•`,-,•,-;,•--- ::,-;.,..-4-,s, .;.,,;:-.4,...;,,,,;.,.; ,64,......,.°-'" •---.,7.- , ..:•?.•`•,:••0',,' -. .. „.4..",''''.. , i'1/4'. •/i.•,..",'".','".;. .'''.. ' ,. .... ,.,• ... . , ( i ;.', • , „','-: - . •, ''' F;; .J. , . ,.. , . . •.,,,.,....,,, ., '' , • t4r,i, . ,. ' - ,-. . '.•• ' . - , . . ,.;, ,,,,;;.....i,,,',';,..,,,,:•,, - - .;, -,,i':...i.....,;:,.,,,;.„,,,,,,c.,..,(41,,,,,.;' •*,'!„-.... ',I, , ''' 6.4 , ,,,,• . 0..,, ,, ' Japanese W. Parking t Counted as a Tree) • , . - • Maple - • Parking Lot .. ..."`.4 ,, `777- -,--1. ,,, , ----. ,-.-.s.,.;-.. :_:-....-., :, _4•• ., fre" - ,-,-. ...„,,, ,,, • .. .4A7-77-3- .:4:'':-;"6,:)/' .›..,--:7-1-;,4.7zik ..,"'''''''"":-.1".,2 ,,,,,;.:,*..,„ ....:,{„...,.._.,. 4*,..,,. .7,,i'f,e7.11w,-...,,, s h'vv, ,.., ',' .tt,. .•__ ..:,-,,,.,.;:, .`''.' , :;.,EL,!....:t--Ak.---74.4410-.. ..,.._ v,,,,,, 4"*"'-r'''C'''''-':''''-- •''.-''s--. 411%." ,:.:.V•''11 .7 ',.:7,...4, 41114._,...4„;(*; ,Iiir14,...0:,, .‘-,:',"44..;';;, ,; -• '' ''',":,,,,I;., - ,..,, ,,, N .173._::,..i.„,,,,z4f,z7.4ir.,A,,,„,....::..: . .. ..., ‘1/44, .,,„ ei, 1e,-*4-4*,-.114-17,44,1-:::„. itg„--34---: J,4,-,i4",,,,,,,,..4,-,,.:::,,;„:1,-,2_,,_,',:;,.„. ' - Iitirw-------4-•-- ---, .,. -----•,-:-0,-------•-,-';__ 'r• -....... 1,,.'••:1411%,,,,,t,--,-- •,-"..,,,, 1r,, .,,,t?„„,-..,.,...0.....,,,,„*., -. •Titil,t,„14,4,it ., -...0,•4;10.. ibio t 130741:....--,. **,,,QN ';1 .;-- j.r.-;-7'7,-;04'.,`. N'-, ..,t,,,&'i•-•/, . Avi:Tio,Ar 1*ot/A- -,,,a-,-.*;,.-.,-. /It ,.--2tv-.-*A0.-..:-,•.-,.:'----..:74,-:,:t01-4,,4„y4-70. 4,.._ ,._,,- -,zi,.„4..,!,e,;„,v.-:o‘vu,,„lkop,iks,cf0,4,71.A,,'1;.,r,, is 010 ....,...0,,...t...w. ,,,,,,;„,..„:„,„... :44.v..„„ritzie.c„. ...,.„,,,,,t,..:., •\,....„.,,,,,•,....,.,a,,,,..,.,roil,,:i.;t_,:;:,,,;.f:i;,.".,. ;:1",.A...44V,,,,iii,V7„7.:27. '''.7'-'4W.'',,if.4.CM''''''i'lli* :0 ;.:44:'''' ''..-,'-' ."—'''' — --,Z.:.,-:',1,re,,. '+'....V.,,,N742.,.:::',,z7;grAii•,?,46.,;,..0...!.,;-, 24.4"0 7-rl'•4:'''-te.i7i ;o44/t", q't --.te'1-4,0-;'''• - '-'"--•.--i•'-"':- ''''''''.7.-:-.:•4-*-Vt.r. .,"7:t.;;;,,T-z- 1,,vf.A.0,4";.:04,,kl•-; , ,,,...,4,,,„„*„‘„ ),,,!--..f..;-q-.iiiii,47-:„,:',.'•.',.::„.''.',:,-- "I ,- ..-.Nit....-ft,Iijr•pifLtii.;*'Itir4,41-rtil.,11!;-:.i.. -'..''' '-'*--4t•;;;:t*Illyfo-;;;;";.• -;'-';''''' '''';'... 2'-'' ,' - -l',;* „"4.._`z-7,04AA.';',:';4'W711ii01'!,'-'.'e!'1"-;i4i ='''-'-'4"-fAci-,V., .":fr-011'i.1-45.' ;:', .: '' ,*.-1-•' ''.-'. .-:-.-1",:i4„,.--;•. --2,1.tii,:itio.Y..4-c.i-ite.,,,', ,444,..:N: ,,,4--.,...,_„,,,,;*-1,...-..$,;:c.,•,--- -., . -.•, ,- • ..1..-,-;1,4.,,-- „,„,,, ..,:f.- -.41-4,A0,4,1441m-4,_%,,;:- _. ti,t}qt. :v4..i.,,,,,o,.':e ... , . '.;,-.0----,•,. ...00-,:-.;,,,-oNim-,...*?;.t5,3-41 '2.,..., ,), .' st, of,':....;'''., - . '''' '`'.- -..r..; --I,-`-',7,:f's4N,•.41v,-,,-,,,,,--z0',:p3*4-,,,,,,,1 ,1, ' .06111,4,..,.'7-.tt'...1",e;", ".,. •,'". • .,., -'.4.;;'.-1A4,.--i''''';'.,,,'"..;3'k, :";.%.,te";1;',...1;.;•;.:.;;;Ia.".'-' 4 1 , . •. '''"''. .:7.'.' '', ",". .',''''''T.-;'''''.-f . '' - - .'-:,'.i.,;-.a.7.',.,,..1-4, .3,-. ,-,:,,,' ,,gflkilt,-%'4..t''''''' r. Lot ...: .. :!•-,;...--::, 1ki,,,,,,--,;:,-,-.- - 7 .„,-_, , :,.-.. _ - .- ''''':'''. '-' ' 7 Z T Parking Ir. _ . - ed Gray Alder - Covered With Ivy Canopy Overhangs vv . Exhibit 20 Exhibits Photographic ,4:Lo%::'c''$;,•'',,':,;•4\'-r•,','','T--;1:','.:,0',-:0,-0-':,.'',:k,..'-',.4,'.---'s. 3 icy 4,-.,;,','',..,_‘,'.',t,.i::,7i.,:-:-.,.1,r.:,.-..''4,,.,.*II',-::-#...'.'-''',.'''-',,..:1,.:,.;:,,..,t,?'''„-'1,i.;.,-r-i:•.''-6l.a',z4-'::ri:3;:1;jl,-'.:,-' 4y 4 14 ?: #'fit. t d*. ':::::,.:.':-.p.,,„:,'1:,--:.2.--: • ' «� .F� •se a� ROCK DRIVERS (3 C t `-. '•:L'',44-;;• ARSO TELY ' a w • �1 � 3 -;:::."1!--1,4,..',:7: � 10 OVEIIPIICNT 1 ,, `�- -' t. , r -yy:„: PARKING ON � `� Z....:,-.:'-{ ^ • ^, PROP RTY x••- 6is * ° % N \, „y 4, $. .n;R ± �` - t V 3` _ �C .• 1 ptsi• „:,...,:,..., "•# 4 °t^� tw �s l..• � r ` Black Locust - In Rii,_ ight of Way - Canopy Overhangs W. Parking Lot 1 7 IFLy { , 11"QR+f t �� ., ✓ Red Maple - Sign of Graft Incompatibility - Trunk Damage Exhibit 21 Photographic Exhibits Ve 3 a < 4 t s des tIX r a Y y F 3`a. } +A "i $;..H' ,, b - le, S,,r } I.,' ,t ' �ji,,,..",!..t.,dam saw w �I f.9µ Jr .xi'�,fk Y t `s a ' ,,✓ r° 4 � -,"t--.1 tt,4,..,:zlefri,c . tvg:1-1.i t, :,, , -N. „„),P �.. t a ' ,,,, to � ---*(-4- - eiy� s t i 4tf + ythN a/,as ✓ �, '.. Trees in Right-Of-Way Along W. Property Boundary that Do Not Overhang the W. Parking Lot — (Not Counted) rt .b S �i '"ks r• .�i t . Ia k�" ^} r irk - 444 7 f E . i 77}7 =, J a t i p AMM � t 9B ',It°, s s r 5 .f ty f x.61 -,--_-...--2-4-,. _syr ,fie` ' 'R ., iii ',- 151 y7 I 1' :, -L'; .�T lam. 3 d u� ' - i Trees in Designated Grove S. of Property Boundary - (Not Counted) Exhibit 22 TREE SURVEY SITE PLAN EXHIBIT APPENDIX APPENDIX A Revised July 1,2013 Tigard Costco Tree ID Worksheet AHC,Inc. TREE TREE TYPE TREE CURRENT HEIGHT,SPREAD,CONDITION,LOCATION CONDITION'PRESERVATION OPEN GROWN(0) HERITAGE PROPOSED FOR NUMBER (GENUS,SPECIES,VARIETY SIZE AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS RATING RATING OR TREE PRESERVATION (KEY) AND COMMON NAME) ("DBH) (0-3) (0-3) STAND GROWN(5) (YES/NO) (YES/NO) A Intentionally Blank - Intentionally Blank - - - - - B Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 2" 10'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES C Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 2.5" 12'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 O NO YES D Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 4.5"M/S 18'Height x 8'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES E Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 3" 12'Height x 5'Spread(S.Property Boundry-Dartmouth) 3 3 0 NO YES 1 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 11" 40'Height x 25'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 S NO YES 2 Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 2.5" 12'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 3 Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 2.5" 12'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO I YES 3 A Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 2" 10'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 4 Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 2.5" 15'Height x 10'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 5 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 12" 40'Height x 20'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 S NO YES 5 A Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 3" 10'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 5 B Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 1.75" 10'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 5 C Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 1.75" 10'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 5 D Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 1.75" 10'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 5 E Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 1.75" 10'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 5 F Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 1.75" 10'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 5 G Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 1.75" 10'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 5 H Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 1.75" 10'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 5 I Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 1.75" 10'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 5 J Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 2" 10'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 5 K Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 1.75" 10'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO I YES 5 L Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 1.75" 10'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 5 M Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 2" 10'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 6 Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 2.5" 12'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 6A Crataegus crusgalli inermis-Cockspur Hawthorn 1" 6'Height x 2'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 S NO YES 7 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 1.75" 10'Height x 13'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 S NO YES 7 A Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 2.5"M/S 12'Height x 5'Spread Multi-Stem(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 8 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 1.25" 10'Height x 3'Spread(S.Entrance)Dead Top 3 3 S NO YES 8 A Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 3"M/S 14'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 9 Intentionally Blank - Intentionally Blank - - - - - 9 A Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 3.5" 14'Height x 6'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 10 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 10" 30'Height x 15'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 S NO YES 10 A Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 3.5"M/S 14'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 11 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 1.25" 8'Height x 2'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 S NO YES 11 A Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 2.5"M/S 12'Height x 5'Spread Multi-Stem(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NO YES 12 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 8" 18'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 S NO YES 12 A Prunus emarginata-Bitter Cherry 4" 20'Height x 20'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 0 NOI YES 13 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 9" 20'Height x 8'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 S NO YES 14 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 8" 15'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 S NO YES 15 Crataegus crusgalli inermis-Cockspur Hawthorn 1.25" 7'Height x 2'Spread(SE.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 16 Crataegus crusgalli inermis-Cockspur Hawthorn 1" 6'Height x 2'Spread(SE.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 16 A Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 1" 8'Height x 3'Spread(SE.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 17 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 1" 7'Height x 2'Spread(SE.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 17 A Quercus macrocarpa-Bur Oak 1" 7'Height x 2'Spread(SE.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 18 Alnus rubra-Red Alder 30" 40'Height x 30'Spread 3-Stem(SE.Parking Lot) 3 3 0 NO YES Appendix A Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc.2013 1 Revised July 1,2013 Tigard Costco Tree ID Worksheet AHC,Inc. TREE TREE TYPE TREE CURRENT HEIGHT,SPREAD,CONDITION,LOCATION CONDITION PRESERVATION OPEN GROWN(0) HERITAGE PROPOSED FOR NUMBER (GENUS,SPECIES,VARIETY SIZE AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS RATING RATING OR TREE PRESERVATION (KEY) AND COMMON NAME) ("DBH) (0-3) (0-3) STAND GROWN(S) (YES/NO) (YES/NO) 18 A Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 1" 8'Height x 3'Spread(SE.Parking Lot)No Top 2 2 S NO YES 19 Acer macrophylla-Bigleaf Maple 11" 20'Height x 10'Spread(SE.Parking Lot) 3 3 0 NO YES 19 A Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 1" 7'Height x 3'Spread(SE.Parking Lot) 3 3 0 NO YES 20 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 6" 20'Height x 12'Spread(SE.Parking Lot)Corner 3 3 - S NO YES 20 A Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 1" 8'Height x 3'Spread(SE.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 20 B Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 1" 7'Height x 3'Spread(SE.Parking Lot) 3 3 0 NO YES 20 C Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 1" 7'Height x 3'Spread(SE.Parking Lot) 3 3 0 NO YES 20 D Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 1" 7'Height x 3'Spread(SE.Parking Lot) 3 3 0 NO YES 21 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 5" 20'Height x 12'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 22 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 5" 20'Height x 12'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 23 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 6" 20'Height x 12'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 23 A Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 22" 21'Height x 10'Spread(S.Parking Lot)By Loading Dock 3 3 S NO YES 24 Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 3" 12'Height x 5'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 0 NO YES 24 A Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 1" 7'Height x 3'Spread(SE.Parking Lot) 3 3 0 NO YES 25 Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 4" 18'Height x 5'Spread 2-Stem(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 0 NO YES 26 Fraxinus latifolia-Oregon Ash 1.25" 12'Height x 2'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 0 NO YES 27 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 5" 18'Height x 10'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 28 Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 30" 45'Height x 25 Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 28 A Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 4" 18'Height x 8'Spread(S.Parking Lot)By Loading Dock 3 3 S NO YES 29 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 4" 18'Height x 8'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 29 A Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 28" 40'Height x 20'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 30 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 9" 30'Height x 20'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 31 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 4" 18'Height x 8'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 32 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 4.5" 18'Height x 10'Spread 2-Stem(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NOI YES 33 Tsuga heterophylla-Western Hemlock 3" 8'Height x 4'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 34 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 4.5" 18'Height x 12'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 35 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 2" 8'Height x 4'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 36 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 6" 20'Height x 15'Spread(S.Parking Lot)Parking Penninsula 3 3 S NO YES 37 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 2" 8'Height x 4'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 38 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 3.5" 15'Height x 8'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 39 Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 4" 18'Height x 4'Spread(S.Parking Lot)Dead Top 1 1 S NO YES 40 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 3"M/S 10'Height x 8'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 41 Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 8.5" 20'Height x 12'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 42 Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 12" 25'Height x 15'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 43 Quercus macrocarpa-Bur Oak 3" 10'Height x 4'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 44 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 2" 12'Height x 5'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO I YES 45 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 2" 12'Height x 5'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 46 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 1" 10'Height x 3'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 47 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 4"M/S 12'Height x 8'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 48 Prunus serrulata-Weeping Flg.Cherry 1" 6'Height x 2'Spread(W.Parking Lot)Dead Top 1 1 S NO YES 49 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 1.25" 10'Height x 3'Spread(S.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO I YES 50 Malus spp.-Crabapple 2"M/S 6'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 51 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 3" 20'Height x 15'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 52 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 3"M/S 10'Height x 8'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 53 Tsuga heterophylla-Western Hemlock 1" 8'Height x 2'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 54 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 5" 20'Height x 12'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 55 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 4" 18'Height x 10'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 56 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 3.5"M/S 6'Height x 5'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot)Mostly Dead 1 1 S NO YES 57 Tsuga heterophylla-Western Hemlock 1.5" 8'Height x 3'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 58 Tsuga heterophylla-Western Hemlock 1.5" 8'Height x 3'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 59 Tsuga heterophylla-Western Hemlock 1.5" 8'Height x 3'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 1 1 S NO YES 60 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 3" 18'Height x 8'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NOI YES 61 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 3" 18'Height x 8'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 62 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 1" 10'Height x 4'Spread(W.Parking Lot)Dead 0 0 S NO NO 63 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 4" 18'Height x 10'Spread 2-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 64 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2"M/S 6'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 64 A Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2"M/S 6'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 64 B Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2"M/S 6'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 65 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 1.75" 12'Height x 3'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 66 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 1.5"M/S 5'Height x 4'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 67 Prunus virginiana-Canada Red Chokecherry 1" 10'Height x 3'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 68 Acr pla`anpidps-Norway Maple 1" 6'Height x 3'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 69 Acer grana um-Vine Maple 2"M/S 6'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 70 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 1"M/S 5'Height x 4'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 71 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 1"M/S 5'Height x 5'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 72 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 73 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 22" 30'Height x 25'Spread(W.Parking Lot)Covered with Ivy 2 2 S NO YES 73 A Alnus rubra-Red Alder 2"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 O NO YES 74 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 2" 10'Height x 8'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES Appendix A Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc.2013 2 Revised July 1,2013 Tigard Costco Tree ID Worksheet AHC,Inc. TREE TREE TYPE TREE CURRENT HEIGHT,SPREAD,CONDITION,LOCATION CONDITION PRESERVATION OPEN GROWN(0) HERITAGE PROPOSED FOR NUMBER (GENUS,SPECIES,VARIETY SIZE AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS RATING RATING OR TREE PRESERVATION (KEY) AND COMMON NAME) ("DBH) (0-3) (0-3) STAND GROWN(S) (YES/NO) (YES/NO) 75 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 3"M/S 10'Height x 10'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 76 Salix scouleri-Scouler's Willow 42"M/S 45'Height x 45'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 2 2 0 NO YES 77 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 22" 30'Height x 25'Spread(W.Parking Lot)Covered with Ivy 1 1 S NO YES 78 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 1.5"M/S 10'Height x 8'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 79 Alnus rubra-Red Alder 1"M/S 10'Height x 8'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 0 NO YES 80 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 1" 6'Height x 4'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot)No top 1 1 S NO YES 80 A Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 2" 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot)No Top 1 1 S NOI YES 81 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 22" 30'Height x 25'Spread(W.Parking Lot)Parking Penninsula 3 3 S NO YES 82 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 1.5"M/S 10'Height x 10'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 83 Alnus rubra-Red Alder 1.5"M/S 12'Height x 8'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 0 NO YES 83 A Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 1.5"M/S 10'Height x 8'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 8313 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 1.5"M/S 10'Height x 8'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO I YES 84 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 2" 15'Height x 3'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 85 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 4" 18'Height x 12'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 86 Alnus incana-Gray Alder 15" 30'Height x 20'Spread(W.Parking Lot)RoW Overhang-Covered w/lvy 2 2 0 NO YES 86 A Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 3" 10'Height x 8'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 86 B Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 1.5"M/S 10'Height x 8'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO I YES 86 C Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 3.5" 10'Height x 10'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 87 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 3"M/S 18'Height x 10'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 88 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 12" 25'Height x 12'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 89 Malus spp.-Crabapple 3" 15'Height x 10'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 89 A Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2"M/S 12'Height x 8'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 90 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 6"M/S 18'Height x 12'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 91 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 4"M/S 18'Height x 12'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 92 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 14" 25'Height x 12'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 93 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 1"M/S 8'Height x 4'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 94 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 6" 20'Height x 15'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot)On the Corner 3 3 S NO YES 95 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 4.5" 25'Height x 8'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NOI YES 96 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 3.5" 10'Height x 10'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 97 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 3.5" 10'Height x 10'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 98 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 3.5" 10'Height x 10'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 99 Prunus serrulata-Weeping Flg.Cherry 1" 6'Height x 2'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 100 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 4" 18'Height x 8'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 101 Malus spp.-Crabapple 2" 8'Height x 4'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 102 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 4" 18'Height x 8'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 103 Prunus serrulata-Weeping Flg.Cherry 1" 6'Height x 2'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 104 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 1" 6'Height x 3'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 105 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 4" 18'Height x 8'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 106 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 1.5" 6'Height x 5'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 107 Ae,p!g�tapoid9,s-Norway Maple 8" 20'Height x 10'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 108 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 12" 20'Height x 15'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 109 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 12" 20'Height x 15'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 110 Alnus rubra-Red Alder 3"M/S 18'Height x 5'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 0 NO YES 111 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2"M/S 12'Height x 5'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 112 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 4" 20'Height x 6'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 113 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 12" 20'Height x 6'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 114 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 11" 20'Height x 6'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 115 Robinia pseudoacacia-Black Locust 36"M/S 30'Height x 30'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot)ROW Overhang 3 3 S NO YES 116 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 5" 20'Height x 18'Spread(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 117 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2"M/S 10'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(W.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 118 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 5" 20'Height x 15'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 119 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 4" 20'Height x 10'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 120 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2"M/S 6'Height x 5'Spread Multi-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 121 Acer platanoides-Norway Maple 6" 20'Height x 10'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 122 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2"M/S 12'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 123 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 12" 20'Height x 15'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 124 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 5" 22'Height x 12'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 125 Acer platanoides-Norway Maple 7" 20'Height x 8'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 126 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 12" 20'Height x 12'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 126 A Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 1"M/S 6'Height x 5'Spread Multi-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 127 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 6" 22'Height x 12'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 128 Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 12" 20'Height x 12'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 128 A Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 10" 20'Height x 12'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 129 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 1"M/S 22'Height x 12'Spread Multi-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 130 Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 14" 25'Height x 15'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 131 Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 14" 25'Height x 15'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 132 Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 14" 25'Height x 18'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 132 A Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 1"M/S 6'Height x 5'Spread Multi-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES Appendix A Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc.2013 3 Revised July 1,2013 Tigard Costco Tree ID Worksheet AHC,Inc. TREE TREE TYPE TREE CURRENT HEIGHT,SPREAD,CONDITION,LOCATION CONDITION PRESERVATION OPEN GROWN(0) HERITAGE PROPOSED FOR NUMBER (GENUS,SPECIES,VARIETY SIZE AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS RATING RATING OR TREE PRESERVATION (KEY) AND COMMON NAME) ("DBH) (0-3) (0-3) STAND GROWN(S) (YES/NO) (YES/NO) 133 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3" 20'Height x 5'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Cormer Penninsula By Tire Store 3 3 S NO YES 134 Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 14" 30'Height x 18'Spread(N.Side of Building)By Tire Store 3 3 S NO YES 135 Cedrus atlantica Glauca-Atlas Cedar 4.5 18'Height x 6'Spread(N.Side of Building)By Tire Store 3 3 S NO YES 136 Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 14" 30'Height x 18'Spread(N.Side of Building)By Tire Store 3 3 S NO YES 137 Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 14" 30'Height x 18'Spread(N.Side of Building)By Tire Store 3 3 S NO YES 138 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 4.5 15'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 139 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 4.5 15'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 140 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 4.5 15'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 141 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 2.5" 12'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 141 A Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 2.5" 12'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 142 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 2.5" 12'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 143 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 2.5" 12'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO I YES 144 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 145 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 146 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 147 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 148 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO I YES 149 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 150 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 151 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 152 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 153 Intentionally Blank - Intentionally(Blank - - S NO - 154 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 2.5" 15'Height x 5 Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 155 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 2.5" 15'Height x 5'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 156 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 2.5" 15'Height x 5'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 157 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 2.5" 15'Height x 5'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 158 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 159 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NOI YES 160 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 161 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 162 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 163 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 164 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 2.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 165 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 2.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 166 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 167 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 168 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 169 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 170 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 171 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 5'Spread(N.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 172 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 5'Spread(N.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 173 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(N.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO NO 174 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 175 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 176 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 177 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 178 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 179 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 180 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 181 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 182 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 183 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 184 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 185 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 2.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(N.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 186 Gleditsia triacanthos inemlis-Honeylocust 5" 25'Height x 20'Spread(N.Property Boundary)Parking Pennisula 3 3 S NO YES 187 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 5" 25'Height x 20'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 188 Acer platanoides-Norway Maple 15" 30'Height x 25'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 189 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 3" 10'Height x 8'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 190 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 8" 15'Height x 12'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 191 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 3" 10'Height x 8'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 192 Acer platanoides-Norway Maple 10" 20'Height x 18'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 193 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 5" 25'Height x 20'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 194 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 5" 25'Height x 20'Spread(N.Property Boundary)Parking Pennisula 3 3 S NO YES 195 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 7" 25'Height x 20'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 196 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 3"M/S 18'Height x 12'Spread Multi-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 197 Acer platanoides-Norway Maple 9" 18'Height x 16'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 198 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 11" 15'Height x 10'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 199 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 11" 15'Height x 10'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES Appendix A Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc.2013 4 Revised July 1,2013 Tigard Costco Tree ID Worksheet AHC,Inc. TREE TREE TYPE TREE CURRENT HEIGHT,SPREAD,CONDITION,LOCATION CONDITION PRESERVATION OPEN GROWN(0) HERITAGE PROPOSED FOR NUMBER (GENUS,SPECIES,VARIETY SIZE AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS RATING RATING OR TREE PRESERVATION (KEY) AND COMMON NAME) ("DBH) (0-3) (0-3) STAND GROWN(S) (YES/NO) (YES/NO) 200 I Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree I 6" 125'Height x 20'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 I 3 I S NO I YES 201 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 7" 25'Height x 20'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Parking Pennisula 3 3 S NO YES 202 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 21" 25'Height x 20'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 203 Acer platanoides-Norway Maple 11" 22'Height x 18'Spread(N.Property Boundary)Dead Top 1 1 S NO YES 204 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 12" 25'Height x 20'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 205 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3.5" 18'Height x 5'Spread(NW.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 206 Acer platanoides-Norway Maple 12" 22'Height x 18'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 207 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 4" 18'Height x 10'Spread(NW.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 208 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3.5" 18'Height x 5'Spread(NW.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 209 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3.5" 18'Height x 5'Spread(NW.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 210 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 2"M/S 10'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 211 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 6" 18'Height x 10'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 212 Acer platanoides-Norway Maple 11" 20'Height x 15'Spread(N.Property Boundary)Dead Top 1 1 S NO YES 213 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 4" 18'Height x 10'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 214 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3.5" 18'Height x 5'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 215 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3.5" 18'Height x 5'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 216 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 5" 25'Height x 18'Spread(N.Property Boundary)Parking Pennisula 3 3 S NO YES 217 Acer platanoides-Norway Maple 12" 22'Height x 18'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 218 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 6" 18'Height x 10'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 219 Acer platanoides-Norway Maple 11" 20'Height x 15'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 220 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3.5" 18'Height x 5'Spread(NW.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 221 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 8" 18'Height x 12'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 222 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 3" 18'Height x 5'Spread(NW.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 223 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 10" 25'Height x 18'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 224 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 7" 18'Height x 12'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 225 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3.5" 18'Height x 5'Spread(NW.Parking Lot) 3 3 S NO YES 226 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3.5" 18'Height x 5'Spread(NW.Parking Lot)Trunk Scar&Severe Lean 2 2 S NO YES 227 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 12" 22'Height x 18'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 228 Acer platanoides-Norway Maple 12" 22'Height x 18'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 229 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 10" 20'Height x 15'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 230 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 10" 20'Height x 15'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 231 Acer platanoides-Norway Maple 12" 22'Height x 18'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 232 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 12" 20'Height x 15'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 233 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3.5" 18'Height x 5'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 2 2 S NO YES 234 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3.5" 18'Height x 5'Spread(N.Property Boundary)By Steps 3 3 S NO YES 234 A Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 3"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 234 B Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 3"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 235 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3.5" 18'Height x 5'Spread(N.Property Boundary)By Steps 3 3 S NO YES 236 Acer platanoides-Norway Maple 10" 20'Height x 15'Spread(N.Property Boundary)Dead Top 1 1 S NO YES 237 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 4"M/S 8'Height x 8'Spread Multi-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 238 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 11" 20'Height x 12'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 239 Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 26" 30'Height x 20'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 240 Pseudotsuga menziesii-Douglas Fir 18" 20'Height x 12'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 241 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 12" 20'Height x 12'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 242 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 3"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 243 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 3"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 243 A Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 3"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 243 B Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 3"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 244 Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 8" 15'Height x 10'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 245 Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 19" 25'Height x 20'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 246 Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar 19" 25'Height x 20'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 246 A Prunus emarginata-Bitter Cherry 6" 25'Height x 20'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 0 NO YES 246 B Prunus emarginata-Bitter Cherry 6" 25'Height x 20'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 0 NO YES 246 C Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 11" 20'Height x 18'Spread(N.Property Boundary)Dead 0 0 S NO NO 247 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 9" 16'Height x 14'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 247 A Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 20" 20'Height x 18'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 248 Pseudotsuga menziesii-Douglas Fir 16" 20'Height x 18'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 249 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 8" 12'Height x 5'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 250 Intentionally Blank - Intentionally Blank - - S NO - 251 Intentionally Blank - Intentionally Blank - - S NO - 252 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 20" 30'Height x 20'Spread 2-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 253 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 20" 30'Height x 20'Spread 2-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 254 Pseudotsuga menziesii-Douglas Fir 6" 12'Height x 10'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 0 NO YES 255 Pseudotsuga menziesii-Douglas Fir 12" 20'Height x 20'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 0 NO YES 256 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 8" 12'Height x 5'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 257 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 8" 18'Height x 12'Spread 2-Stem(N.Property Boundary) _ 3 3 S NO YES 258 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 8" 18'Height x 12'Spread 2-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 259 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 8" 118'Height x 12'Spread 2-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES Appendix A Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc.2013 5 Revised July 1,2013 Tigard Costco Tree ID Worksheet AHC,Inc. TREE TREE TYPE TREE CURRENT HEIGHT,SPREAD,CONDITION,LOCATION CONDITION PRESERVATION OPEN GROWN(0) HERITAGE PROPOSED FOR NUMBER (GENUS,SPECIES,VARIETY SIZE AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS RATING RATING OR TREE PRESERVATION (KEY) AND COMMON NAME) ("DBH) (0-3) (0-3) STAND GROWN(S) (YES/NO) (YES/NO) 260 Thuja plicata-Western Red Cedar 8" 18'Height x 12'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 261 Thuja plicata-Western Red Cedar 8" 18'Height x 12'Spread 3-Stem(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 262 Thuja plicata-Western Red Cedar 4" 18'Height x 12'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 262 A Pinus flexilis-Limber Pine 6" 6'Height x 5'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 263 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3" 12'Height x 5'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 263 A Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3" 12'Height x 5'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 264 Pinus nigra-Austrian Pine 3" 6'Height x 5'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 265 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 6" 22'Height x 12'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 266 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 3" 18'Height x 10'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO NO 267 Tilia cordata-Littleleaf Linden 6" 18'Height x 12'Spread(N.Property Boundary)Street Tree 3 3 S NO YES 267 A Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 7" 22'Height x 12'Spread(N.Property Boundary) 3 3 S NO YES 268 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 1.25" 8'Height x 4'Spread(N.Entrance) 3 0 S NO I YES 269 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 3" 18'Height x 4'Spread(N.Entrance) 3 0 S NO YES 270 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 3.5" 15'Height x 8'Spread(N.Entrance) 3 0 S NO YES 271 P,sudotsuga m9�nzi sii-Douglas Fir 4" 12'Height x 4'Spread(N.Entrance)Sheared 3 0 0 NO YES 272 Platanus acerifo(ia-London Planetree 3.5" 18'Height x 8'Spread(N.Entrance) 3 0 S NO YES 273 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 3.5" 15'Height x 8'Spread(N.Entrance) 3 0 S NO YES 274 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 4" 20'Height x 8'Spread(N.Entrance) 3 0 S NO YES 275 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 4" 15'Height x 10'Spread(N.Entrance) 3 0 S NO YES 276 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 4" 20'Height x 8'Spread(N.Entrance) 3 0 S NO YES 277 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 3.5" 18'Height x 8'Spread(N.Entrance) 3 0 S NO YES 278 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 4.5" 18'Height x 12'Spread(N.Entrance)Memory Plaque 3 0 S NO YES 279 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 3" 12'Height x 6'Spread(N.Entrance) 3 0 S NO YES 280 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 3.5" 18'Height x 8'Spread(N.Entrance) 3 0 S NO NO 281 Tilia cordata-Littleleaf Linden 7" 20'Height x 15'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)Street Tree 3 3 S NO YES 282 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 4" 18'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)On Corner 3 0 S NO NO 283 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 4" 15'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)On Corner 3 0 S NO NO 284 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2"M/S 6'Height x 5'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 285 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 4" 18'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 286 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 3" 6'Height x 5'Spread Single-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 287 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 4.5" 12'Height x 8'Spread (E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 288 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 4" 18'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 289 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 4.5" 12'Height x 8'Spread (E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 290 Tilia cordata-Littleleaf Linden 4.5" 12'Height x 6'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)Street Tree 3 3 S NO YES 291 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2.5"M/S 6'Height x 5'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 292 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 4" 18'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 293 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 5" 15'Height x 12'Spread (E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 294 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 4" 18'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot-Dartmouth)Parking Penninsula 3 0 S NO NO 295 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 3.5"M/S 10'Height x 10'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 296 Tilia cordata-Littleleaf Linden 4.5" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.-Dartmouth)Street Tree-Trunk Damage 2 2 S NO YES 297 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3.5" 18'Height x 8'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 298 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 4.5"M/S 12'Height x 10'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 299 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3" 15'Height x 6'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)Parking Penninsul, 3 0 S NO NO 300 Tilia cordata-Littleleaf Linden 4" 18'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)Street Tree 3 3 S NO YES 301 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 3"M/S 6'Height x 5'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 302 Thuja plicata-Western Red Cedar 12" 18'Height x 12'Spread 3-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 303 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 3.5" 15'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 304 Thuja plicata-Western Red Cedar 13" 18'Height x 12'Spread 4-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 305 Tilia cordata-Littleleaf Linden 4" 18'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)Street Tree 3 3 S NO YES 306 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 3.5" 15'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 307 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2.5"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 308 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2.5"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 309 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2.5"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 310 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 3.5" 12'Height x 8'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)Parking Penninsul. 1 0 S NO NO 311 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 3.5" 15'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 312 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 4" 15'Height x 12'Spread (E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO NO 313 Tilia cordata-Littleleaf Linden 5" 20'Height x 12'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)Street Tree 3 3 S NO YES 314 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 4" 15'Height x 12'Spread (E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 0 S NO YES 315 Tilia cordata-Littleleaf Linden 3.5" 25'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)Street Tree 3 3 S NO YES 316 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 5" 18'Height x 12'Spread (E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 317 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 3.5" 18'Height x 12'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 318 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2.5"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 319 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3" 15'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 320 Tilia cordata-Littleleaf Linden 4.5" 25'Height x 12'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)Street Tree 3 3 S NO YES 321 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3" 15'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 322 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2.5"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 323 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 3.5" 18'Height x 12'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 324 Tilia cordata-Littleleaf Linden 5" 20'Height x 12'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)Street Tree 3 3 S NO YES Appendix A Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc.2013 6 Revised July 1,2013 Tigard Costco Tree ID Worksheet AHC,Inc. TREE TREE TYPE TREE CURRENT HEIGHT,SPREAD,CONDITION,LOCATION CONDITION PRESERVATION OPEN GROWN(0) HERITAGE PROPOSED FOR NUMBER (GENUS,SPECIES,VARIETY SIZE AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS RATING RATING OR TREE PRESERVATION (KEY) AND COMMON NAME) ("DBH) (0-3) (0-3) STAND GROWN(S) (YES/NO) (YES/NO) 325 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3" 15'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 326 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2.5"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 327 Tilia cordata-Littleleaf Linden 4" 18'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)Street Tree 3 3 S NO YES 328 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 1" 6'Height x 2'Spread (E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 329 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3" 15'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 330 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2.5"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)By Steps 3 3 S NO YES 331 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 3.5"M/S 10'Height x 8'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)By Step 3 3 S NO YES 332 Tilia cordata-Littleleaf Linden 5" 20'Height x 12'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)Street Tree 3 3 S NO YES 333 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2.5"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)By Steps 3 3 S NO YES 334 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 3" 12'Height x 8'Spread (E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 335 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 3" 18'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 336 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 3.5"M/S 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO I YES 337 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2.5"M/S 10'Height x 8'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 338 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 1" 6'Height x 2'Spread (E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 339 Tilia cordata-Littleleaf Linden 5" 20'Height x 12'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)Street Tree 3 3 S NO YES 340 Intentionally Blank - Intentionalll(Blank - - S NO - 341 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 3.5" 18'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 342 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 3.5" 18'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 343 Prunus cerasifera-Purple Leaf Flowering Plum 3.5" 18'Height x 12'Spread (E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 344 Tilia cordata-Littleleaf Linden 4" 18'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)Street Tree 3 3 S NO YES 345 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 3.5" 18'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 345 A Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot-Dartmouth)Parking Penninsula 3 3 S NO YES 346 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2.5"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 347 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree 3.5" 18'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 348 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 2.5"M/S 8'Height x 6'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 349 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 1.5"M/S 6'Height x 5'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 350 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 351 Tilia cordata-Littleleaf Linden 5" 20'Height x 12'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)Street Tree 3 3 S NOI YES 352 Thuja plicate-Western Red Cedar 12" 22'Height x 18'Spread 3-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 353 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3" 15'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 354 Acer circinatum-Vine Maple 1.5"M/S 6'Height x 5'Spread Multi-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 355 Thuja plicata-Western Red Cedar 13" 22'Height x 18'Spread 5-Stem(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth) 3 3 S NO YES 356 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3" 15'Height x 10'Spread(E.Property Boundary-Dartmouth)Corner 3 0 S NO YES 357 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 3.5" 15'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance)Dead Top 2 0 S NO YES 358 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3" 18'Height x 8'Spread(S.Entrance)Dead Top 3 0 S NO YES 359 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 3.5" 15'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance)Dead Top 2 0 S NO YES 360 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3" 18'Height x 8'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 0 S NO YES 361 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 3" 15'Height x 10'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 0 S NO YES 362 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3" 18'Height x 8'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 0 S NO YES 363 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 3.5" 18'Height x 10'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 0 S NO YES 364 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3" 18'Height x 8'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 0 S NO YES 365 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3" 18'Height x 8'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 S NO YES 366 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 3.5" 18'Height x 10'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 S NO YES 367 Quercus coccinea-Scarlet Oak 3" 18'Height x 8'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 S NO YES 368 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 3 S NO YES 369 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 3" 15'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance)Dead Top 2 0 S NO YES 370 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 3" 15'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance)Dead Top 2 0 S NO YES 371 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 3" 15'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance)Dead Top 2 0 S NO YES 372 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 3" 15'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance)Dead Top 2 0 S NO YES 373 Pyrus calleryana-Chanticleer Flowering Pear 3" 15'Height x 5'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 0 S NO YES 374 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 3.5" 18'Height x 10'Spread(S.Entrance) 3 0 S NO YES 375 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3.5" 15'Height x 10'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO NO 376 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3.5" 15'Height x 10'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO NO 377 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 4" 20'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 378 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 4" 20'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Trunk Damage-Island 2 2 S NO YES 379 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis-Honeylocust 3.5" 18'Height x 10'Spread (E.Parking Lot)Large Island 3 3 S NO YES 380 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 4" 20'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 0 S NO YES 381 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 4" 20'Height x 12'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 0 S NO YES 382 Gleditsia triacanthos inemiis-Honeylocust 3.5" 18'Height x 12'Spread (E.Parking Lot)Island 3 0 S NO YES 383 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 4" 20'Height x 12'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 0 S NO YES 384 Gleditsia triacanthos inemiis-Honeylocust 4" 20'Height x 12'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 0 S NO YES 385 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 18'Height x 10'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 386 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 18'Height x 10'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 387 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 388 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 389 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 390 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 391 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO NO Appendix A Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc.2013 7 Revised July 1,2013 Tigard Costco Tree ID Worksheet AHC,Inc. TREE TREE TYPE TREE CURRENT HEIGHT,SPREAD,CONDITION,LOCATION CONDITION PRESERVATION OPEN GROWN(0) HERITAGE PROPOSED FOR NUMBER (GENUS,SPECIES,VARIETY SIZE AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS RATING RATING OR TREE PRESERVATION (KEY) AND COMMON NAME) ("DBH) (0-3) (0-3) STAND GROWN(S) (YES/NO) (YES/NO) 392 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO NO 393 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 394 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 395 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 20'Height x 10'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap-Trunk/Root Flare Damage 3 3 S NO YES 396 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 2 2 S NO YES 397 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 398 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 399 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 400 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 401 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO I YES 402 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 403 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Trunk Damage-Island 2 2 S NO YES 404 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 405 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 406 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO I YES 407 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 408 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 409 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 410 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 411 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 412 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO YES 413 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO NO 414 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO NO 415 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Trunk/Root Flare Damage-End Cap 2 0 S NO NO 416 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 0 S NO YES 417 Intentionally Blank - Intentionally Blank - - - - - 418 Intentionally Blank - Intentionally Blank - - - - - 419 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 0 S NO YES 420 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 421 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 422 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO YES 423 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 0 S NO YES 424 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 0 S NO YES 425 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO NO 426 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO NO 427 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 3 S NO NO Appendix A Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc.2013 8 Revised July 1,2013 Tigard Costco Tree ID Worksheet AHC,Inc. TREE TREE TYPE TREE CURRENT HEIGHT,SPREAD,CONDITION,LOCATION CONDITION PRESERVATION OPEN GROWN(0) HERITAGE PROPOSED FOR NUMBER (GENUS,SPECIES,VARIETY SIZE AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS RATING RATING OR TREE PRESERVATION (KEY) AND COMMON NAME) ("DBH) (0-3) (0-3) STAND GROWN(S) (YES/NO) (YES/NO) 428 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 0 S NO NO 429 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 0 S NO NO 430 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO NO 430 A Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO NO 431 Intentionally Blank - Intentionally Blank - - - - - 432 Intentionally Blank - Intentionally Blank - - - - - 433 Intentionally Blank - Intentionally Blank - - - - - 434 Intentionally Blank - IntentionallyBlank - - - - - 435 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 0 S NO NO 435 A Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 3 S NO NO 436 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 0 S NO NO 437 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 0 S NO NO 438 Acer rubrum-Red Maple 3.5" 18'Height x 6'Spread(E.Parking Lot)Island 3 0 S NO NO 439 Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Green Ash 3" 15'Height x 8'Spread(E.Parking Lot)End Cap 3 f 0 S NO NO 52 Trees Scheduled for Removal(2 of the 52 Trees are Already Dead)(3 of the 52 trees are 6"or Larger) n9, ,40_12_,.FT. 440 Trees Scheduled for Preservation(Not Counting 2 Dead Trees)(103 of the 432 Live Trees are 6"or Larger) TOTAL CANOPY 492 Total Trees(2 of the 492 Total Trees are Already Dead and 23 More are in Poor Condition) AT MATURITY (106 of The 492 Total Trees are 6"or Larger not Counting 2 Dead Trees) (REFER TO APPENDIX B) (Avg.Mature Canopy Spread/2)'x p (Including%Covered By Parking Lot) (Excluding Trees To Be Removed) Appendix A Applied Horticultural Consulting,Inc.2013 9 APPENDIX B SPECIES MATURE CANOPY SPREAD (In Alphabetical Order by Genus) DECIDUOUS TREES (Found On-Site) Acer circinatum-Vine Maple- 15' Height x 15' Spread (Dirr) Acer macrophyllum- Bigleaf Maple-65' Height x 50' Spread (Native Trees)2 Acer platanoides -Norway Maple-45' Height x 40' Spread (Nuisance Trees)3 Acer rubrum-Red Maple-45' Height x 40' Spread (Street Trees-Large Stature)5 Alnus incana- Gray Alder-40' Height x 30' Spread (Dirr)i Alnus rubra-Red Alder- 100' Height x 40' Spread (Native Trees)2 Crataegus crus-galli inermis-Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn-30' Height x 20' Spread (Dirr)i Fraxinus latifolia- Oregon Ash-60' Height x 30' Spread (Native Trees)2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica- Green Ash-50' Height x 40' Spread (Parking Lot Trees)4 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis - Honeylocust-45' Height x 35' Spread (Street Trees-Large Stature)5 Malus spp. - Crabapple-20' Height x 20' Spread (Street Trees -Small Stature)6 Platanus acerifolia-London Planetree-50' Height x 40' Spread (Street Trees -Large Stature)6 Prunus cerasifera-Flowering Plum-30' Height x 20' Spread (Dirr)i Prunus emarginata-Bitter Cherry-30' Height x 20' Spread (Native Trees)2 Prunus subhirtella-Weeping Cherry- 15' Height x 25' Spread (Dirr)i Prunus virginiana- Canada Red Chokecherry- 30' Height x 20' Spread (Dirr)i Pyrus calleryana'Chanticleer' -Flowering Pear-40' Height x 15' Spread (Columnar Trees)4 Quercus coccinea- Scarlet Oak-45' Height x 30' Spread (Dirr)i Quercus macrocarpa-Bur Oak-30' Height x 25' Spread (Dirr)i Robinia pseudoacacia- Black Locust- 100' Height x 50' Spread (Nuisance Trees)3 Salix scouleri-Scouler's Willow-40' Height x 40' Spread (Native Trees)2 Tilia cordata-Littleleaf Linden-50' Height x 35' Spread (Dirr)i CONIFEROUS TREES (Found On-Site) Cedrus atlantica Glauca-Atlas Cedar-90' Height x 50' Spread (Dirr)i Cedrus deodara-Deodar Cedar- 120' Height x 65' Spread (Dirr)i Pinus flexilis -Limber Pine-40' Height x 20' Spread (Dirr) 1 Pinus nigra-Austrian Pine-45' Height x 25' Spread (Dirr)i Pseudotsuga menziesii-Douglas Fir- 180' Height x 40' Spread (Native Trees)2 Thuja plicata-Western Red Cedar- 100' Height x 30' Spread (Native Trees)2 Tsuga heterophylla-Western Hemlock- 150' Height x 40' Spread (Native Trees)2 i Source:Manual of Woody Landscape Plants,Dirr, 1990. a Source:Appendix 5,City of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual,March 2013. 3 Source:Appendix 6,City of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual,March 2013. 4 Source:Appendix 3,City of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual,March 2013. s Source:Appendix 2-Large Stature Street Trees,City of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual,March 2013. s Source:Appendix 2-Small Stature Street Trees,City of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual,March 2013. (See Prairiefire Crab). Appendix B 1 ,% KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES , INC . TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLANNING N610 SW Alder Street,Suite 700,Portland,OR 97205 503.228.5230 F 503.273.8169 Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition —Transportation Impact Study Date: August 5, 2013 Project#: 11367 To: Mike McCarthy, PE, City of Tigard Douglas Baumgartner, PE, ODOT Region 1 ->- PROpe ic<GGINk.F (S'sa From: Sonia Hennum, PE, PTOE& Kelly Laustsen, Kittelson &Associates, Inc. /, ' 9 ' .i .3074-PE CC: David Rogers, Costco Wholesale # John Ellingsen, Barghausen Consulting Engineers OF EGO9/200- 44. Project: Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition-Tigard, Oregon . Subject: Transportation Impact Study This technical memorandum summarizes the transportation impact analysis completed for the proposed Costco Gasoline fuel station addition to the existing Costco development located on SW Dartmouth Street in Tigard, Oregon (known as the Tigard Costco). In fulfillment of City of Tigard and Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) requirements, traffic operations and impact analysis have been conducted to determine whether the site and surrounding transportation system can adequately support the proposed development and what transportation-related mitigations are required. This memorandum is organized in to the following sections: 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Introduction 3.0 2013 Existing Traffic Conditions 4.0 Traffic Impact Analysis 5.0 Access Operations and On-Site Circulation 6.0 Site Parking Supply and Demand 7.0 Findings& Recommendations 8.0 References FILENAME: I I K' TELSON.COMI FSI H PORTLAND I PROJFILEI11367-TIGARD COSTCO GASOLINE ADDI770NIREPORT111367 77GARDCOSTC077S V3.DOCX Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 2 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SITE LOCATION & SURROUNDING AREA The proposed development site is located on SW Dartmouth Street in Tigard, Oregon,just south of the intersection of SW Dartmouth Street and OR 99W. The site is currently developed with a Costco warehouse and parking. No changes to the location or number of existing access points for the site are proposed as part of this development application. In addition to the Costco property, SW Dartmouth Street serves as access for a mix of other retail, commercial, and office uses. A site vicinity map showing the project location and surrounding roadway network is provided in Figure 1. DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION The proposed development plan consists of adding an 18 fueling position Costco Gasoline fuel station to the existing Costco site. The fuel station will be located on the northeastern portion of the site, just south of the site's northern-most access to SW Dartmouth Street (which is a right-in/right-out only access). The existing Costco site also has a signalized full access driveway on SW Dartmouth Street, located approximately 650 feet south of the right-in/right-out access. Some of the existing parking on the site will be removed to accommodate the fuel station. Overall, there is a net parking reduction of 84 spaces proposed.The conceptual development site plan is provided in Figure 2. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of this transportation impact analysis, the proposed Costco Gasoline fuel station addition to the existing Tigard Costco site can be developed while maintaining acceptable operations on the surrounding transportation system and within the site. The study resulted in the following findings and recommendations: Existing Conditions ■ Under existing conditions all of the study intersections operate within volume-to-capacity and LOS standards during the weekday PM and weekend midday peak hours, with the exception of the intersection of OR 99W/Dartmouth Street-SW 78th Avenue. Several movements at the northbound and southbound approaches are operating at a LOS F and/or v/c ratio over 1.0 during both the weekday PM and weekend midday peak hours. Therefore, operations at the intersection do not meet City of Tigard standards. ■ Historical crash data from ODOT for the last five years identified a total of 137 crashes at the study intersections, none of which resulted in fatalities. Less than half the crashes were identified as injury crashes. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition ,� August 2013 A I / _I-7 I.iLL] 1j �1 �I 1 I �i 4 i 1 1 044--. plzi 1 / i , (_, \ li_fl 1 1 I ) _- f ik, . , ./ z �� SITE ,C\'. -fi ' J r 1 4* 1 . [ l rd 1,0 i , 217 \ -I—:c,_711 1 jj il =,, 1.--- n I \ .., \ - ., *is..... ii ..g , I --I- k 4 - �, 21.7 m YI N O rnl M N ¢' (.:0_,L) I 3 m I0 0 Si O a CD 0 ti to r NI el O 3 aI 0 (/ WASHINGTON COUNTY(7/f 219 a m c f *11) 4 4V161 mSITE U o, oir ,.m M ________ _____N F SITE VICINITY MAP FIGURE • -STUDY INTERSECTIONS TIGARD, OREGON 1 v KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. N` TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING/PLANNING H:IprojfilelI 1367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Additionldwgslfigsl11367 TigardCostcoFigures.dwg Aug 01,2013-9:03am-klaustsen Layout Tab:02 '. BABE LINE y a / , 1 1 cl, 1 (7. "— __:::....... , a �. 1 1 !• o® Q , ,... c) D q��or� M -, ® O /-i- „ I 0 13 R1 434' - ®4 0 o r — Mr g O T, A (n —nnrB m� m— A. y N .401 0 — oo.17 MPM,o, ~ y ,\N. • N z alep� 1 • z D E, 1o�Plr” 4K. 1 ?J- : �I L1 N ALAN eco Aa°ic— T36' II . . O .,. o. f(z f • Z D — � ii1OLEBALE (^��I `�� 'A''`IL f `�\ q RECEIVING �W7,...J l f l I. I� @ . 0 pi EXIST.TIRE CENTER y Z z b A I . 01 iI 1_L1 o n ., z ri 11"" 1.,',7 o mac. I '' BA tea* r _iI .R �l all - p II III 1 n ) o AREA OF N0e 4 4h� . .11 a la 1 I I II \ 33a' rWORK /Ce �o Tr —s` ,o U t + i Int y It y y i �- I 8_ Ca E 'E ® _ 1 ® C) 1 a i dl - N — _ o A i h ii fi, b I WETLAND oe BNACN LINE� —= I D - -9 0 ,_-D— —�4 s ,, o b 1 n'V'�� t1_ ,fit + t byt � _� - Ip1 B ` 1 I _l14 i 11 R\. I �1 L m: 1 I '' yr 01 'off `� , y?��- .1 _ ; 1 / I 11 . DARTMOUTH p 4 Om v ". .' _ N r"r • 0 CD XI �V r 1 O DI /' AREA OF WORK Z z / 2) O I n Itl: (ce, IV i / = Q o m co Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 5 o The study intersections along the OR 99W corridor experienced relatively high numbers of rear-end type crashes. o The intersection of OR 99W and SW 72nd Avenue experienced relatively high numbers of turning type crashes and a higher numbers of injury crashes than the other study intersections along OR 99W. This is likely due to the fact that the intersection is skewed and the northbound and southbound left-turns were previously permitted phasing. The northbound and southbound left-turns have recently been converted to permitted + protected phasing. 2014 Background Traffic Conditions ■ A 0.5-percent per year annual growth rate was used to forecast year 2014 conditions for the ODOT intersections along OR 99W, and a 2-percent per year annual growth rate was used to forecast year 2014 conditions for the remaining City of Tigard intersections along SW Dartmouth Street. ■ Under the 2014 Background Conditions scenario (i.e., not including the proposed Costco Gasoline development), all of the study intersections were found to continue to operate within applicable standards with the exception of the intersection of OR 99W/Dartmouth Street-SW 78th Avenue, which does not meet the City of Tigard Standards. Several movements on the northbound and southbound approaches to the intersection are projected to operate at a LOS F and/or v/c ratio over 1.0 during both the weekday PM and weekend midday peak hours, as under existing conditions. Proposed Development Plan ■ The proposed development plan calls for the addition of a Costco Gasoline fuel station as an ancillary use to the existing Costco development located on SW Dartmouth Street. ■ The proposed site plan consists of an 18 fueling position fuel station located in the northeastern portion of the site, just south of the site's northern-most access to SW Dartmouth Street. ■ Overall the development plan will result in a net parking reduction of 84 stalls. ■ No changes to the location or number of site access points are proposed. ■ The proposed Costco Gasoline fuel station is expected to generate approximately 430 total trip ends and 90 net new trip ends during the weekday PM peak hour. ■ The proposed Costco Gasoline fuel station is expected to generate approximately 460 total trip ends and 110 net new trip ends during the weekend midday peak hour. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 6 2014 Total Traffic Conditions ■ Under the 2014 Total Traffic Conditions scenario, all of the study intersections were found to operate within standards, with the exception of the intersection of OR 99W/Dartmouth Street-SW 78th Avenue, which does not meet the City of Tigard Standards. Several movements on the northbound and southbound approaches to the intersection are projected to operate at a LOS F and/or v/c ratio over 1.0 during both the weekday PM and weekend midday peak hours, as under existing and 2014 background conditions. o This forecast condition has been previously identified as a future need and an improvement is outlined in the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan. The transportation impact fees that will be contributed by the development will be contributions to the funding and completion of these improvements. Access Operations & On-Site Circulation ■ The operations of site-access driveways were reviewed to ensure that adequate intersection sight distance can be maintained for vehicles exiting the site. ■ Both driveways will be able to provide adequate sight distance. ■ Landscaping should be monitored to verify it does not limit sight distance. ■ Internal circulation was evaluated as part of this study to ensure that the site provides sufficient on-site circulation for pedestrian movements and internal site traffic. ■ Truck routes and turning templates were also reviewed to ensure safe and efficient truck circulation for the proposed fuel station. ■ Vehicular queuing was analyzed for the right-in/right-out North Costco Driveway and signalized South Costco Driveway on SW Dartmouth Street. o The queuing impacts from the proposed gas station traffic are not expected to be a hindrance to safe efficient operations at the North Costco Driveway. o The queue from the eastbound left-turn at the South Costco Driveway is anticipated to exceed the available storage under all future analysis scenarios. To mitigate this, the eastbound approach can be restriped to accommodate an exclusive left-turn lane and shared left-through turn lane with approximately 250 feet of storage. Site Parking Supply & Demand ■ There are a total of 730 existing parking spaces located on site. ■ During the peak half hour of activity on the weekend, the site's parking was 92% utilized. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 7 ■ Addition of the proposed Costco fuel station in the eastern portion of the site will result in a net reduction of 84 parking spaces in total on site and a revised total parking supply of 646 spaces ■ Given that the site is essentially at capacity during the peak half hour period, the proposed reduction in on-site parking needs to be addressed so that adequate parking supply will still be available on site for Costco members and shoppers. ■ Costco will pursue agreements with neighboring property owners (such as the Regal Cinema of SW 72nd Avenue) to utilize their lots for employee parking during peak periods in order to free up sufficient space for Costco members. The details of the analysis, pertinent findings, and recommendations are documented in the remainder of this memorandum. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 8 2.0 INTRODUCTION Costco is proposing to add a Costco Gasoline fuel station to the existing Costco development located on SW Dartmouth Street in Tigard, Oregon. The existing Costco site is bounded by SW Dartmouth Street to the east, the southbound OR 217 ramps to the west, OR 99W to the north, and undeveloped property to the south. The proposed fuel station would be located on the northeastern portion of the existing Costco property, just south of the site's northern-most access to SW Dartmouth Street. The northern-most driveway to the Costco site is a right-in/right-out access. The existing Costco development also has a signalized full access driveway on SW Dartmouth Street, located approximately 650 feet to the south of the right-in/right-out access. Again, a site vicinity map showing the project location and surrounding roadway network is provided in Figure 1 and the proposed development site plan is provided in Figure 2. STUDY INTERSECTIONS Based on a collaborative scope provided by the City of Tigard and Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Region 1, the transportation impact analysis for the project examined the following seven intersections: ■ OR 99W (Pacific Highway)/Southbound OR 217 Ramps ■ OR 99W (Pacific Highway)/Northbound OR 217 Ramps ■ OR 99W (Pacific Highway)/SW Dartmouth Street-SW 78th Avenue ■ OR 99W (Pacific Highway)/SW 72nd Avenue ■ SW Dartmouth Street/North Costco Driveway ■ SW Dartmouth Street/South Costco Driveway ■ SW Dartmouth Street/SW 72nd Avenue SCOPE OF THE REPORT Traffic operations and impact analysis has been conducted to confirm whether the site and transportation system can adequately support the proposed development and identify any mitigations that may be required to address deficiencies. The scope of the project analysis was developed in collaboration with City of Tigard and ODOT Region 1 Staff. Specifically, this analysis documents: ■ Existing land uses and transportation system conditions within the site vicinity; ■ Other planned developments and transportation improvements in the study area; Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 9 o Based on discussion with City of Tigard staff, the in-process traffic for the Tigard Triangle Retail Center and Red Rock Center will be included in the study; o The transportation improvements along SW Dartmouth and Highway 99W proposed as part of the Tigard Triangle Retail Center and Red Rock Center will also be included in the background analysis of the study; ■ Year 2014 Background Traffic Conditions (future build-out year without the proposed project) during the weekday PM and weekend midday peak periods, including in- process/approved developments and regional growth; ■ Trip generation, distribution, and assignment estimates for the proposed development; ■ Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions (future build-out year with the proposed project) assuming full build-out of the site during the weekday PM and weekend midday peak periods; ■ Site access and site circulation analysis; ■ A peak period site parking supply, demand, and utilization study to document the adequacy of on-site parking needs with the proposed project in place; and ■ Conclusions and recommendations. TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL STANDARDS The acceptable levels of service for the study intersections are based on the road's jurisdiction and the operating standards established by the respective jurisdictional authority. Intersections along OR 99W are required to meet Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Standards, while intersections along SW Dartmouth Street are required to meet City of Tigard Standards. Per the Oregon Highway Plan updated mobility policy (Reference 1), the following standards apply to the ODOT intersections along OR 99W: ■ The ODOT study intersections along OR 99W are required to operate with an overall peak hour volume-to-capacity ratio (v/c) that does not exceed 0.99. The following City of Tigard standards apply to the intersections along SW Dartmouth Street: ■ The City of Tigard requires that LOS "D" and a v/c ratio of 0.95 or better be maintained at all signalized intersections during the peak hour — applies to the SW Dartmouth Street/South Costco Driveway intersection ■ At all-way-stop controlled (AWSC) intersections, LOS is based on overall intersection operations. City operating standards require that LOS "E" and a v/c ratio of 0.95 or better Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 10 be maintained at all unsignalized intersections during the peak hour — applies to the SW Dartmouth Street/SW 72nd Avenue intersection ■ At two-way-stop controlled (TWSC) intersections, LOS is based on the operations of the critical movement. City operating standards require that LOS "E" and a v/c ratio of 0.95 or better be maintained at all unsignalized intersections during the peak hour— applies to the SW Dartmouth Street/North Costco Driveway intersection ■ In addition, City of Tigard standards require that no individual movements operate at a LOS F or v/c ratio of 1.0 or above at any intersections. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 11 3.0 2013 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The existing conditions analysis identifies site conditions and the current operational and geometric characteristics of roadways within the study area. The purpose of this section is to create a basis of comparison to future conditions. The proposed location of the fuel station is currently developed as parking for the existing Costco warehouse. TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES As shown in Figure 1, the study site is bordered by OR 99W and SW Dartmouth Street. These roadways connect to OR 217, SW 72nd Avenue, and SW 68th Avenue (which connects to 1-5) as part of the greater local and regional transportation network. There are also interchanges between OR 217, OR 99W, and 1-5 in the vicinity of the site, forming the "Tigard Triangle." Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the primary transportation facilities in the site vicinity. Figure 3 shows the existing lane configurations and traffic control devices at the study intersections. Table 1 Existing Transportation Facilities and Roadway Designations mb Post- Bicycle On-Street Roadway Classification Lanes Sidewalks Lanes Parking OR 99W Statewide 5 lanes 35 MPH TWLTL Yes Yes No Highway(ODOT) SW Dartmouth Yes St/SW 78th Ave Major Arterial(T) 3-5 lanes 35 MPH TWLTL' Yes Partial No SW 72nd Ave Major Arterial(T) 2-4 lanes 30 MPH TWLTL Partial Partial No (ODOT)=ODOT jurisdiction (T)=City of Tigard jurisdiction MPH=miles per hour TWLTL=two-way left turn lane 'Median on SW Dartmouth Street starting at OR 99W and ending between the South Costco Driveway and SW 72"d Avenue TRANSIT SERVICE The Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) operates public transit service within the City of Tigard. The site vicinity is well served by a variety of transit options. In the site vicinity, bus service is provided along OR 99W between the Northbound OR 217 Ramps and SW Dartmouth Street, at the intersections of OR 99W and SW Dartmouth Street, SW 74th Avenue, and SW 72nd Avenue, and the intersection of SW Dartmouth Street and SW 68th Avenue. These intersections serve the following bus lines: • #12: Barbur/Sandy Blvd— Serving riders from Parkrose/Sumner or Gresham Transit Center (TC) to Sherwood; Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon H:Iprojfile111367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Additionldwgsifigs111367 TigardCostcoFigures.dwg Aug 01,2013-9:04am-klaustsen Layout Tab:03 77o ** 1 < a r X 0 513 0 0 Z33 -1 O O -0mco < a• 0 -n co y m z 2° z -0 riii r m G) = a i N D ccn, �\\ 0 m0 r Z a D -om ✓ En Z — ZZ an j\ iii O o1 ti 0 0 2` \ / I iC y 41- 1 /( 1 ilii < L_ Vs., '''.\-- \Nt SW BEAVERTON-TUALATIN Y / /11' I N m \ 1 1 x cr5 . I -1 ,e �O . m u, I 4 m 0 ---I �% n 0 0 - )41 o 'y�,i- c c 33 z Ta. \ SW 72ND AVE O Il z N Qo 33 0 mI(7 I SW 68TH AVE / 1 z I I 00 �_ ,, r O m w 73 00 1 I I Om zN Imhz W � / 1:1: Fr.., DJm m W \ 1i Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 13 ■ #64: Marquam Hill/Tigard—Serving riders from Marquam Hill to Tigard TC; ■ #78:Beaverton/Lake Oswego—Serving riders from Beaverton TC to Lake Oswego TC; and, ■ #94: Sherwood/Pacific Hwy Express — Serving riders to Portland City Center and to Sherwood. In addition, there is a Tigard Park and Ride available near the Costco site at the intersection of OR 99W and SW 74th Avenue. MAX light rail service is provided within the site vicinity as well, through the Tigard TC. Currently the WES Commuter Rail connects this area to the Portland City Center through connections with the MAX Red Line and MAX Blue Line at the Beaverton TC. The WES Commuter Rail operates with 30 minute headways. Between bus and WES service, the immediate vicinity is served by transit service from 5:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. on weekdays and 5:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. on weekends. Additional bus transit service is also available at the Tigard TC, which is approximately % of a mile southwest of the Costco site. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND OPERATIONS Manual turning movement counts were conducted at the study intersections in early June 2013. The counts were conducted on a typical mid-week day during the evening peak period (4:00 to 6:00 PM) and on a Saturday during the midday peak period (12:00 to 3:00 PM).Appendix "A"contains the traffic count worksheets used in this study. A system peak hour was established for the study area to identify the time period of highest volume during each peak period on the overall network. This system peak hour may be slightly different than the individual peak hour at any one particular intersection and may not directly match the individual peak volumes. However, the system peak provides the highest volumes on the overall system and does represent the critical system wide peak for evaluating transportation operations. The weekday PM system peak hour in the study area was found to occur between 4:50 and 5:50 PM. In no case was the system peak total entering volume at an intersection is less than 2% of the individual peak. The weekend midday system peak hour was found to occur between 12:15 PM and 1:15 PM. In this case, the total entering volumes at the Costco accesses are notably higher during the intersection peaks. Therefore, the intersection peak hour volumes were used at these intersections to represent a conservative analysis. The turning movement counts from the weekday PM and weekend midday peak hours were summarized and rounded to the nearest five vehicles per hour as shown in Figure 4. Peak Hour Intersection Operations All level of service analyses described in this report were performed using Synchro software and in accordance with the procedures stated in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (Reference 2). A description of level of service and the criteria by which it is determined is presented in Appendix 'B."As outlined previously, a volume-to-capacity ratio of 0.99 or lower is in general considered acceptable for Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition August 2013 0 10 0 0 .. ,,,' o ems a O Qs s=c• D 14 1 a 0 Los=B ✓265 a O c 1 ---) I I ? I if-—IS s L s D �p } O $Bios c A/� 00 = Del=20.0 0 = Del=12.3 0 = ♦ Del=41.2 I 0 = ♦ Del=32.7 ♦ I I I W• Q J►V/C=0.75 W Q J►V/C=0.67 W Q 66 Jr V/C=0.91 W Q 115 V/C=0.77 I I W W .0k.--,k-,. w LU 4,,,..-,L t W LU .8,—* \r w LU ,2��—► \l ci- s° w�fls '-i oo 0 o yr: lT 99W >- �i�w6` >- j0 tyS 0• CC ass y p Q Q o`s`y Q ov`y \ 1 f1 p5 �19gp 0 �'�Q p 0CC \325 LOS=C ,1 O LOS=B O LOS=D 11 O LOS=C 12 o = Del=29.3 0 i Del=12.6 0 = ♦ Del=37.7 * 0 _ * DeI=28.2 I 4 Z Y V/C=0.87 Z Y J►V/C=0.69 Z Y 56/J►V/C=0.81 Z Y ,,,p"....x ` ..------- LU W Q p9p.�► W < 6'Ip.-� r W < \1p.-,� �R r Y < 1011^�► �R ( V` Y W 9Qp Y W 1 965 h Y W 1 635 ` $p \ y LWLI 0_ LWLI 0_ aoo`r LWLI 0_ wgioo W 0_ `P�r$� / ( SPG\�\G 0 3 S4491›.. � :5 \y7f---------- NO co, up o_ cc Ail J I . LOS=B 2 W \ o = 60 LOS=B — SITE Y Y DeI=10.9 N. Q I < 5 w < V/C=0.09 1 o a 6 a ~ T } CDD co 41 s�A DARTi19pUTy II g sT '— .- ¢11 \ >- 00 IT '-----K\ Vo c� o /� dl 0 (Pt_ I I r O CM=EB I LOS=B CC N a = 150 DeI=14.6 ; �9G it i' Z Y V/C=0.29 O W Q t C• ", �"7" Wco Oji / ccj ® O � I i 9� T \ 0 U N O NO NN C9')??, R. O5 2 2251 DeI=117 p O= 165 De0S=C 1 212 x265 to W Q,1 a160 V/C=0.50* IY Q 125 likV/C=AWSC c 160 a � I d � It� I y NM NNS 3 a 1------\-_: Z 0 a a ., co G ›- aco acorn m 0 a f t L I I _ \ O 2951 LOS=B 2 451 LOS=B X50 h LEGENI a I 220 DeI=15.5 0 I 175 DeI=11.2 -4-145 U Z Y V/C=0.60 Z Y 160 V/C=AWSC c45 a CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (111 as w 0- 1 w cood 1 r, (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL NN �N / CO 0.3 OF SERVICE(UNSIGNALIZED) Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL o. DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS, WEEKDAY PM & WEEKEND MIDDAY PEAK HOURS = WC=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO TIGARD, OREGON i KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. p TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING/ PLANNING Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 15 the study intersections by ODOT. City of Tigard requires a volume-to-capacity ratio of 0.95 or lower and level of service "E" or better, with the exception of a level of service "D" requirement for the signalized intersection of SW Dartmouth Street and the South Costco Driveway. Furthermore, per City of Tigard requirements, no individual movement may operate at LOS F or v/c ratio over 1.0. The results of the weekday PM and weekend midday hour operational analyses are summarized in Figure 4.Appendix "C" contains the existing conditions operational analysis worksheets. Under existing conditions all of the study intersections operate within ODOT and City of Tigard standards during the weekday PM and weekend midday peak hours with the exception of the OR 99W/SW Dartmouth Street-SW 78th Avenue intersection. While the intersection meets the ODOT volume-to-capacity ratio standard during both the weekday PM peak hour and weekend midday peak hour, several movements operate at a LOS F and/or over a v/c ratio of 1.0 and therefore do not meet City of Tigard standards. The northbound left-turn, northbound through/right-turn, southbound left- turn and southbound through/right-turn movements operate at a LOS F during the weekday PM peak hour. The southbound through/right-turn movement also operates at a LOS F during the weekend midday peak hour. Table 2 shows the LOS and v/c ratio of the movements that do not meet standards under existing conditions. Table 2 Movements at OR 99W/SW Dartmouth Street-SW 78th Avenue intersection that do not Meet Standards under Existing Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekend Midday Peak Hour Movement LOS v/c Ratio LOS v/c Ratio Northbound Left-Turn F 0.90 - - Northbound Through/Right-Turn F 1.18 - - Southbound Left-Turn F 0.94 - - Southbound Through/Right-Turn F 0.86 F 0.91 A site visit was performed on Wednesday, July 24th, 2013 during the PM peak hour to better assess existing conditions, corroborate the analysis findings, and ensure the operational analysis software was accurately reflecting existing conditions. As noted in past studies of the area (i.e. the Tigard Retail Center TIA, City of Tigard Transportation System Plan (Reference 3)), several intersection approaches on the Highway 99W corridor operates at near or oversaturated conditions during the weekday PM peak hour. In particular, westbound demand along the corridor is very high. During the site visit, it was observed that westbound through vehicles are typically able to clear the study intersections in a single cycle. There is a high demand at the northbound and southbound approaches to Highway 99W at the SW 72nd Avenue and SW Dartmouth Street-SW 78th Avenue intersections. During the site visit, a few cycles were observed at OR 99W/SW Dartmouth Street-SW 78th Avenue where the northbound queue was not able to clear the intersection in a single cycle. Significant demand was also observed at the southbound approach to the intersection. Therefore, the operational results shown in Table 2 accurately reflect the conditions observed in the field. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 16 INTERSECTION CRASH HISTORY Historical crash data for the study intersections was reviewed in an effort to identify any potential existing intersection safety issues. Crash data for the study intersections was obtained from ODOT for the most recent five-year period on record (January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011). Table 3 identifies the reported crashes at each of the intersections during this five-year period. Table 3 Intersection Crash History(January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011) Crash Type Crash Severity Intersection Rear-End Turning Angle Ped. Other PDO1 Injury Total OR 99W&SB OR 217 Ramps 20 12 1 0 0 21 12 33 OR 99W&NB OR 217 Ramps 30 4 1 0 6 24 11 35 OR 99W&SW Dartmouth St/SW 78`h Ave 13 0 3 0 0 12 4 16 OR 99W&SW 72nd Ave 14 14 3 2 0 12 21 33 SW Dartmouth St from OR 99W to SW 72"d Ave(Costco site driveways)2 2 4 2 0 0 5 3 8 SW 72"d Ave&SW Dartmouth St 3 3 5 0 1 4 8 12 1 PDO—property damage only 2Crash data collected for stretch of SW Dartmouth St from OR 99W to SW 72nd Ave,as ODOT only recently started isolating crashes at the Costco driveways Table 2 illustrates the total number of crashes, as well as the breakdown of crashes by type and severity, at the study intersections. There were no fatal crashes observed at the study intersections over the past five years. The OR 99W corridor experienced relatively high proportion of rear-end crashes during the past five years. In addition to the rear-end crashes, the intersection of OR 99W/SW 72nd Avenue experienced a relatively high proportion of turning movement crashes. The intersection of OR 99W/SW 72nd Avenue had a relatively higher number of injury crashes compared to the other study intersections along OR 99W. The majority of the turning movement crashes at this intersection occurred between 2007 and 2009 (12 of the 14 crashes). These crashes may be attributed to the fact that the intersection is skewed and the northbound and southbound left-turns at the intersection were previously permitted turns. The signal timing at the intersection has recently been updated to change the northbound and southbound left-turns to permitted plus protected phasing. Appendix "D"contains the historical traffic safety data provided by ODOT. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 17 4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS For the traffic impact analysis, the horizon year 2014 was established for study. Year 2014 represents the anticipated build-out year for the proposed Costco Gasoline development (i.e., when it is anticipated to be constructed and operational). For year 2014, both background (without the proposed project) and total traffic (with the proposed project) conditions were evaluated to determine the Costco Gasoline development's specific impact on the surrounding transportation system. The background analyses address regional growth and planned developments in the site vicinity. The total traffic conditions analyses also include the projected site-generated traffic from the proposed development and resultant traffic conditions assuming occupancy of the site. 2014 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS In the year 2014 Background Traffic Conditions analysis, traffic operations prior to occupancy of the proposed development were analyzed for the purposes of establishing a baseline against which to measure the specific impacts of the proposed Costco Gasoline facility. Previous studies conducted in the Tigard Triangle have established that a 0.5-percent per year annual growth rate is acceptable for the OR 99W intersections, while a 2-percent per year annual growth rate is acceptable for the other study intersections in developing the 2014 Background Traffic Conditions traffic volumes. In addition to the annual growth rates, two in-process developments were identified as applicable to the study intersections. Estimated trip generation volumes for the Tigard Retail Center and the Red Rock Center were added to the existing year 2013 traffic volumes, shown in Figure 4, along with the appropriate growth rate to develop the 2014 Background Traffic Conditions scenario traffic volumes. Based on other proposed development in the area, several transportation improvements are currently planned at the study intersections. These planned and pending improvements have been included in the 2014 Background Conditions analysis. Specifically, the planned improvements are: ■ Widen OR 99W along the north and south side to add a third westbound through-lane and raised landscape median between OR 217 and SW 72nd Avenue (includes the removal of one of the westbound left-turn lanes at OR 99W/SW 72nd Avenue). ■ Add an overlap phase to the eastbound right-turn movement at the signalized intersection of OR 99W/SW 72nd Avenue. ■ Widen SW Dartmouth Street between the South Costco Driveway signal and the proposed driveway for the Tigard Retail Center entrance on SW Dartmouth Street to allow a second westbound thru-lane (entails converting the southbound right-turn lane at the South Costco Driveway signal to a through-right lane). ■ Increase the storage for the northbound left-turn lane and the eastbound right-turn lane at the intersection of OR 99W/SW Dartmouth Street. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 18 Figure 5 summarizes the Planned Lane Configurations and Traffic Control Devices for 2014 Background Conditions. Using the planned lane configurations and traffic control devices, Figure 6 summarizes the results of the 2014 Background Traffic Conditions (without the project) peak hour traffic operational analysis. As shown in the figure, the four intersections on OR 99W meet the ODOT v/c ratio standard of 0.99. However, the intersection of OR 99 W/Dartmouth Street-SW 78th Avenue does not meet City of Tigard standards as multiple approaches are operating at a LOS F and/or v/c ratio over 1.0 during both the weekday PM peak hour and weekend midday peak hour (as during existing conditions). Table 5 shows the LOS and v/c ratio of the movements that do not meet standards under 2014 background conditions. This forecast conditions has been previously identified as a future need and an improvement is outlined in the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan. Both Costco driveways on SW Dartmouth Street and the intersection of SW Dartmouth Street/SW 72nd Avenue meet applicable standards. Table 5 Movements at OR 99W/SW Dartmouth Street-SW 78th Avenue intersection that do not Meet Standards under 2014 Background Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekend Midday Peak Hour Movement LOS v/c Ratio LOS v/c Ratio Northbound Left-Turn F 1.33 F 1.13 Northbound Through/Right-Turn F 1.39 - - Southbound Left-Turn F 0.95 - - Southbound Through/Right-Turn F 0.98 F 1.13 Attachment "E"contains the 2012 Background Conditions scenario operational analysis worksheets. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN The proposed development plan consists of adding an 18 fueling position Costco Gasoline fuel station to the existing Costco site. The fuel station will be located on the northeastern portion of the site, just south of the site's northern-most access to SW Dartmouth Street (which is a right-in/right-out only access). The existing Costco site also has a signalized full access driveway on SW Dartmouth Street, located approximately 650 feet south of the right-in/right-out access. Some of the existing parking on the site will be removed to accommodate the fuel station. Overall, there is a net parking reduction of 84 spaces proposed. Again, the conceptual site plan is provided in Figure 2 of this report. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon H:Iprojfile111367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Additionldwgslfigsl11367 TigardCostcoFigures.dwg Aug 01,2013-9:04am-klaustsen Layout Tab:05 _, Q. � 1 viii O0 Q SI) . 1 1 1O O N J -1 < O G)7' m , D D O m oO Oz �\' R' o z20 Cn_ Z m oii a z D m G7 I a zN H > CD/) \\ N mO r Z ~ A n G) c0i > mm r D . Z - ZZ Z 0 . 0 \\4 4:: 0 1.4 OO ,r _i_--/ 1 .I` 1 iii r 011e\ / "1 tfi Gk .W BEAVERTON-TUALATIN Y 4. ilik 11 I- D Z'''‘\ Th., lJ D Z ^0 J . oD • c•' s� O40 il ,y 'v7c C z y m co D 6 y SW 72ND AVE O Z , -,J -i, CnD0 no SW 68TH AVE / ti 3z _ J.. xi ( I I r - - X) m \ m <_ On / I zu J I n � T / I0 o X \ al ). M CO Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition August 2013 0 10 0 0 .. S !Q �l I I I --IS d �pss y 19�o a d2o a cc ws„y �10 y acc �$o�y �3o I I I I } O CLOS=C yy >- O LOS=B �2 } O LOS=E �,9� } 0 LOS=C /N� ¢p = Del=21.8 p = Del=11.4 p = ♦ Del=69.6 i p = f Del=32.5 ♦ I I I I W Q yJ�V/C=0.78 W Q y�V/C=0.70}} W Q gy/J►V/C=0.76 W Q 115/ V/C=0.75 I w Lu w ,y`ZR�^+ w W 1�°y'� l W W 12�y-�► W W �0'� a 2 a ti� � a .....,c‘116, � a ti- 0 99W a y 3° a ¢ oo y Q o�o CC p 1/I �,6y pp �0 CC Z�Ro pp ; N � 3-y pCC p 325 O LOS=C r O LOS=B O LOS=D 13 ' O LOS=C A/1`Z ' p = Del=33.9 p i Del=11.5 p = ♦ Del=50.6 1 p = ) Del=26.0 ♦ 4 Z Y Jr V/C=0.90 Z Y Jr V/C=0.74 Z Y yy Jr V/C=0.83 ' Z Y 13° V/C=0.58 / w ¢ yyy w < s°y ! w < -,. ��r Y w 06°—,. AN Y W ° Y w 1 96y h Y W 1 ly5 $° \ y W a W a ao9s W a NrNcP W a °AS SPG \°C) 0 (\ s5� :5 — m. 5 — � Q M= IH CM=EB w Y¢ = LOS=B — 2 SITE Y 60 Del=13.1 \ ¢ > w IQ V/C=0.13 1 p t oo 41 r CO C I S T RT�,jOUT1 up y sr — Y >- COLO �\ Eri o °C '�1 IT o m I r O CM=EB I- LOS=D CC co 0 = 200 Del=28.2 w \9d i" Z Y V/C=0.58 ;,.:.` op w LU CL CO m 07i 3 , 7 I I I — w. ® O �9�T \ 0 1 U o N COO o NIS Im NCOUI CI' d � �1 o_ f+�► I a >- 0 1 LOS=B Q o 130 LOS=B 5L100 ' p = Del=11.9 p = 260 Del=11.4 x360 M W QCI- H 165 V/C=0.51 W Q 220 V/C=0.67 C195 ------\--: y NN MNO L8-j IN t el, -0 _ G 0 a a cC i 1 a cC A/I,\-:'''\\\ o -- \ 0 325 LOS=B g Q 170:11: LOS=A X50 h LEGUI p 2 215 Del=16.4 p = 295 Del=9.4 4-280 U Z Y A V/C=0.64 Z Y 290 V/C=0.58 C45 I T,, CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) Y < •�t Y < f / S LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE w o w o Nim (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL • 2co- co OF SERVICE(UNSIGNALIZED) Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL o. DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) YEAR 2014 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS, WEEKDAY PM AND WEEKEND MIDDAY PEAK HOURS = WC=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO TIGARD, OREGON KKITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING/ PLANNING Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 21 Development Trip Generation For the past 15 years, Kittelson and Associates, Inc. (KAI) has maintained a database of traffic data and travel characteristics for Costco Wholesale. The database contains transportation information such as trip rates, trip type percentages, and parking demand for Costco locations in the United States as well as Canada and Mexico. The database is updated and refined each time new Costco traffic counts or information become available to KAI. In order to best evaluate the anticipated transportation characteristics of the proposed fuel station addition to the existing Costco on SW Dartmouth Street, the Costco database was quarried to develop the trip generation estimate since it provides use-specific data that most accurately represents the anticipated traffic characteristics of the unique development type. Evaluating the transportation-related impact of the proposed Costco Gasoline addition on SW Dartmouth Street requires special consideration as there is an existing Costco warehouse that has been in operation on the site for several years. As such, the site currently generates traffic based on the existing Costco development's characteristics, market, and Costco membership base. In evaluating the fuel station addition, it is essential to isolate out the new uses and characteristics that are proposed for the site as these are the elements that will effect and change the site's existing trip generation. Costco Gasoline fuel stations all function as ancillary uses to the main Costco warehouses that share their sites. The fuel stations are only available for members and require a Costco membership card to activate the pumps for dispensing gasoline. Payment can only be made with credit card and, unlike traditional gas/service station operations, there are no other automotive services (such as repairs) or other type of sales (including food or sundries) associated with the Costco Gasoline facility. All Costco Gasoline facilities have a minimum of one attendant working at all times who is responsible for expediting members' use of the fuel pumps, directing entering vehicles to open pump locations, and managing on-site queues from the pumps. In Oregon, there will be multiple attendants working at the fuel station at all times it is open to dispense fuel for member as required by State Law. The Costco transportation data base contains a large quantity of data related to Costco Gasoline fuel stations. Trip generation rates and trip type information for over 25 Costco Gasoline facilities located throughout the U.S are included. Costco has invested significant effort into developing this use-specific trip generation database for both their warehouses and their fuel stations because of the unique characteristics of Costco customer travel that exist due to membership requirements and the nature of Costco sales. These unique elements apply to the trip generation for Costco warehouses, Costco Gasoline fuel stations, and the interaction of trips between the two. Costco Gasoline Trip Characteristics The data collected at existing Costco Gasoline sites indicate the trip generation characteristics summarized in Table 6 for total gas station trip generation rates, internal trip capture between the fuel Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 22 station and the warehouse, as well as pass-by or diverted trip capture from the surrounding street system. Table 6 Costco Gasoline Trip Generation Characteristics Trip Characteristic Weekday PM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour Total Trip Ends(50/50 entering/exiting split) 430 430 Internal Trip Percentage 34% 35% Pass-by Trip Percentage' 37% 33% Diverted Trip Percentage' 37% 36% 'Percentage of remaining external trips after internal trips have been accounted for. As indicated in the table, the unique nature of Costco operations and its membership requirements result in different trip characteristics than those observed at the standard fuel stations summarized in the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The percentage of pass-by and diverted trips at Costco fuel stations is considerably lower than that quoted in the ITE manual for typical fuel stations. Correspondingly, membership requirements also have a significant effect on trip internalization (or sharing of trips) between the warehouse and the fuel station. Fewer people exclusively visit a Costco fuel station (in comparison to a typical standalone station) because they have another primary purpose for visiting the site (that being a trip to the warehouse). The supporting database information for these characteristics can be provided upon request. Internal Trips A key finding from the studies conducted at Costco facilities is the fact that approximately 34% of weekday pm and 35% of the weekend midday peak hour trips to and from Costco fuel stations are internal capture trips. Internal capture trips account for those members who patronize both the warehouse and the gasoline pumps during a single visit to the Costco site. As such, although they account for a trip to both the warehouse and the fuel station, they only account for one overall vehicle trip to the site and on the surrounding transportation system. Table 3 shows that, based on studies including surveys at Costco fuel stations and membership card transaction data, on average 34% or 35% of the members buying gas during the weekday and weekend peak hours are members whose main purpose to the site is to visit the Costco warehouse. At some sites this number ranges as high as 75% but for the purposes of conservative analysis the average estimate is typically used. Pass-by& Diverted Trips Another key trip characteristic that must be considered is that of pass-by and diverted trip capture. Pass-by and diverted trips represent members (and trips) that are currently traveling on the surrounding street network for some other primary purpose (such as a trip from work to home) and stop into the site en route during their normal travel. As such, pass-by and diverted trips do not result in a net increase in traffic on the surrounding transportation system and, typically, their only effect Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 23 occurs at the immediate intersections and site access driveways where they become turning movements. Table 3 shows that, based on studies of customer surveys at Costco fuel stations, on average 74% of the members buying gas during the weekday PM peak hour and 69% of the members buying gas during the weekend peak hour can be classified as pass-by and diverted trip capture from the surrounding street system. This is lower than the average pass-by rate quoted in the ITE Trip Generation Manual for typical service stations (45%) and, again, is attributable to the unique travel characteristics that result from Costco's membership requirements. Costco Gasoline Trip Generation Estimate Based on the above information, a trip generation estimate for the proposed Clackamas Costco Gasoline fuel station was prepared as summarized in Table 7. Table 7 Tigard Costco Gasoline Trip Generation Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekend Midday Peak Hour Size Trips In Trips Out Total Trips Trips In Trips Out Total Trips Total Trip Ends(50/50 Split) 215 215 430 230 230 460 Internal Trips(34%PM,35%WE) 70 70 140 80 80 160 Total External Trip Ends 18 fueling 145 145 290 150 150 300 Pass-by Trips(37%PM,33%WE) positions 50 50 100 45 45 90 Diverted Trips(37%PM,36%WE) 50 50 100 50 50 100 Net New Trip Ends 45 45 90 55 55 110 As shown in Table 7, it is anticipated that the proposed Costco Gasoline addition will generate approximately 90 net new weekday PM peak hour trip ends and approximately 110 net new weekend peak hour trip ends. Trip Distribution & Assignment Estimates of the distribution of site generated trips for the proposed project were developed based on existing travel patterns observed from the site and an understanding of key origins and destinations in the area. Figure 7 illustrates the estimated trip distribution pattern that was used for this analysis. Figure 8 shows the resultant assignment of site generated trips for the weekday PM peak hour and the weekend midday peak hour based on the assumed distribution pattern. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon H:Iprojfile111367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Additionldwgslfigs111367 TigardCostcoFigures.dwg Aug 01,2013-9:04am-klaustsen Layout Tab:07 -I K p A- = I_�\ y (ii• —I °W o -0 ITI x NSW BEAVERTON-TUALATIN Y sl) > 0 0 o- Z m z Qo m �--5-' a zD 2• N z m0 v• m � r z (!1 Ze°°1112i.r.D Z .• f74401 ilir f\ \'''\C9 C)------ ---Cr' _w (.5% CO '� E -73 y m ,0 L c° Z % co = -1 m \ �� SW 72ND AVE —I - - -- il 171 1 0 / O —I 73 I0 —I W y I I I I SWI68TH AVd 33 0 r 1 I m� �� - I � zz / "' a N G)m1,., I J 1 I A 3 IW m H:Iprojfilel11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Additionldwgslfigsl11367 TigardCostcoFigures.dwg Aug 01,2013-9:05am-klaustsen Layout Tab:08 y V/\\ WEEKEND MIDDAY WEEKDAY PM Q �1 51 x PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR O o 0 m 6Z ( j 5. z Spct a ZN ~�s ~ ° O m N m0 Is 2• n 13m D (n WEEKEND MIDDAY WEEKDAY PM z• f0—) PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR t a\ c>.--IL 9� `o `'° WEEKEND MIDDAY WEEKDAY PM WEEKEND MIDDAY WEEKDAY PM WEEKEND MIDDAY WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR 0 PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR © PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR 40-"ill40 110 105 -25—10- -25—► 90—O. -4---25 80— 1—-25 c. ww°cis WEEKEND MIDDAY WEEKDAY PM WEEKEND MIDDAY WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR 0 PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR I ...-/._. CI,LSI C.71 j s 7 41 Ai Ji. \ \ 5-)1 �5 5-)I1 �5 �I.� / M U) 11111 /-I INTI v .W BEAVERTON-TUALATIN _ m m 1 z IIP XI I m 1 D M N ✓ —� X D c, r^ , G' VJ I— i \ M i co 1 m 66 �� 9 33 0 m I fil o ti� 1 —— y v_< i z co E 4, SW 72ND AVE 2,3 T. �j-----:.--\--7/11/ / M Z I I I 0 j— I II I SV1l 68TH AV� �- v i �� I I I 11m \ — — ° D - _ m o1 X 1 iligig I kildCO c -,-- 7-- , m f/ Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 26 2014 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS In the total traffic conditions analyses, traffic operations including occupancy of the proposed Costco Gasoline development are evaluated to determine the project's specific impacts and necessary mitigations. The estimated site generated traffic volumes (shown in Figure 8) were combined with the 2014 Background Traffic Conditions traffic volumes (shown in Figure 6) to develop the 2014 Total Traffic Conditions volumes estimating future conditions upon build-out of the proposed Costco Gasoline facility. The resultant 2014 Total Traffic Conditions volumes and operational conditions (including the Costco project) are summarized in Figure 9 for the weekday PM and weekend midday peak hours. As shown in the figure, the four intersections on OR 99W all will continue to meet the ODOT v/c ratio standard of 0.99 with the inclusion of the Costco Gasoline traffic. However, as under background conditions, the intersection of OR 99 W/Dartmouth Street-SW 78th Avenue will not meet City of Tigard standards during the weekday PM peak hour or weekend midday peak hour, as multiple movements are operating at a LOS F or v/c ratio over 1.0. Table 8 shows the LOS and v/c ratio of the movements that do not meet standards under 2014 background conditions. Again, this forecast conditions has been previously identified as a future need and an improvement is outlined in the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan. Both Costco driveways on SW Dartmouth Street and the intersection of SW Dartmouth Street & SW 72nd Avenue meet applicable standards with the addition of the proposed fuel station traffic. Table 8 Movements at OR 99W/SW Dartmouth Street-SW 78th Avenue intersection that do not Meet Standards under 2014 Background Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekend Midday Peak Hour Movement LOS v/c Ratio LOS v/c Ratio Northbound Left-Turn F 1.45 F 1.23 Northbound Through/Right-Turn F 1.56 F 0.91 Southbound Left-Turn F 0.95 - - Southbound Through/Right-Turn F 0.99 F 1.14 RECOMMENDED MITIGATIONS All intersections are projected to meet applicable standards by jurisdiction under the 2014 background and total traffic conditions with the exception of the intersection of OR 99W/Dartmouth Street-SW 78th Avenue. This intersection does not meet the City of Tigard standards under either scenario (or existing conditions), and therefore no mitigations are required or attributable to the Costco Gasoline development. This intersection is identified in the City of Tigard TSP for improvement. Project 66e identifies intersection improvements, including turn lanes and auxiliary lanes for the intersection. The Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition August 2013 0 0 .. > I J h----113 �Qrs`'s ° 0 ws'r� V'6.k' I I I I I --1 I Q O LOS=C ( Q 0 LOS=B Q LOS=F 12° Q O LOS=C TBS Os. CC / O Del=22.2 0 Del=11.7 0 ♦ Del=>80 I 0 f Del=32.6 W• Q yJ.V/C=0.78 W Q yJ►V/C=0.71} W Q goy/�V/C=0.80 W Q , V/C=0.75 I �" W W "...-,` W w 1�2 y--+. \ W w 1`Z1 '�► r w w 1`Z°.10-* lk r Cl- � a ~a Lua ~c''c� wa ..........„„") vss �.-3os oo J I -7- 99W sss r r ���s Q sP 0, O Aq9 LOS=C r O LOS=B O ►� LOS=E 1� O LOS=C /�''° O i Del=34.7 0 = Del=11.7 0 = ♦ Del=60.7 1 0 = ) Del=26.0 ♦ 4 V/C=0.91 V/C=0.75 / V/C=0.90 0 V/C=0.58 / ZY � ZY � �I ZY 5y� R ZY 13 � r Y W 1y p0A .....................! Y < ggy. h` Y < 11,0�► N. Y < 0,11y-lb, ` 0 ( uoo 3 c NV J IH 0 Q j O CM=EB _ w (\ LOS=B 2 Y Y 90 SITE Del=14.2 N. 0 I Q . . V/C=0.20'S Lu0 1 1 r CO Y 1 41 C I S T up RT�,jGUT yST '- .59.- LO 0 NCO oi f,' IT '----‹\ 0 cc Al+ \ ZO S/ I r O CM=EB I74- - LOS=E CC co a = �1 Del=36.4 ; �-9` i Z Y V/C=0.69 t Y aw" CO 2r 1 3 , I I I __.____ ® O �9�� 0 1 U o N 00 O NIS Im 2 cc O2 335 DeI=14.6 0 O= 265 De35:1:4 l=11.5 R. 1. r 365 \ to W QH 175-N. V/C09 IY Q 225 V/C==0.68 C 195 Ti, 11 MN0 /3a.„, , .:, , G > mro0 -o \ g O .1 = g K =O 175-.11LOS=A X50 h LEGEN) 0 I 225 Del=22.1 0 = 300 Del=9.5 4-285 �� U Z Y A V/C=0.73 Z Y 295. V/C=0.59 c45 a cc Ai 1 0 c, r-a,,,,,-- ... a CM=CRITICAL MOVEMENT(UNSIGNALIZED) LOS=INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE as W d T W d T / 00 0�0 mom (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL N� 2 CO 01 OF SERVICE(UNSIGNALIZED) Del=INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY (SIGNALIZED)/CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL o. DELAY(UNSIGNALIZED) YEAR 2014 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS, WEEKDAY PM AND WEEKEND MIDDAY PEAK HOURS = V/C=CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIOTIGARD, OREGON • KKITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING/ PLANNING Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 28 Tigard Triangle is a special area of focus in the City of Tigard TSP, as it is described as a "priority opportunity for community development and economic activity." The TSP notes that there is "considerable congestion on Pacific Highway in the vicinity of the Tigard Triangle and this congestion is forecast to worsen with future development and regional growth." Therefore, the TSP includes a number of projects aimed at providing capacity and relieving congestion in the Tigard Triangle, including the intersection improvements at OR 99W/Dartmouth Street/SW 78th Avenue. The TSP also includes widening on 72nd Avenue. Table 9 shows the transportation projects included for the Tigard Triangle area in the City of Tigard TSP. The transportation impact fees that will be contributed by the development will be contributions to the funding and completion of these improvements. Table 9: City of Tigard TSP Projects in Tigard Triangle Time Financially Cost ID Name Project Type Description Jurisdiction frame Constrained? Estimate 72'Avenue 31 Widening:Ore 99W Road Widen to 4/5 lanes Tigard Mid- Yes $8,000,000 to Dartmouth Widening term 72"d Avenue Road Widen to 4/5 lanes, Mid- 32 Widening:Dartmouth Tigard Yes $7,000,000 to Hunziker Widening including bridge term I Complete 4/5-lane section I Dartmouth St. Road from Costco to 72nd Ave Near- 37 Widening Widening (small section missing in Tigard term No $320,000 eastbound direction only) Widen to 4 lanes plus turn Dartmouth St. Road lanes and sidewalks Near- 38 d Tigard Yes $3,000,000 Widening Widening between 72" Avenue and I- term 5(68tH) 52 72"d/Dartmouth Tigard Intersection Traffic signal and Near- Yes $1,100,000 Improvement intersection widening term Intersection improvements Pacific Highway Intersection such as added turn lanes,a Near- 66f 99W/72odAve Improvement southbound right turn ODOT/Tigard term Yes $2,000,000 pocket Intersection improvements- Pacific Highway Intersection Near- 66e Turn lanes and auxiliary ODOT/Tigard Yes $6,000,000 99W/Dartmouth St. Improvement term lanes Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 29 5.0 ACCESS OPERATIONS & ON-SITE CIRCULATION The operations of site-access driveways were reviewed to ensure that adequate intersection sight distance can be maintained for vehicles exiting the site. As they do today, both driveways will be able to provide adequate sight distance. Landscaping should be monitored to verify it does not limit sight distance. Queuing and operations at the southern-most site access points was also reviewed to ensure appropriate operations and configurations. Internal circulation was also evaluated as part of this study to ensure that the site provides sufficient on-site circulation for pedestrian movements and internal site traffic. KAI worked with the project development team to enhance the operational and safety aspects of the proposed site-access driveway, on-site circulation, and parking. Truck routes and turning templates were also reviewed to ensure safe and efficient truck circulation for the proposed fuel station. Through this analysis, the proposed site plan has been refined to meet the needs of both pedestrian and vehicular traffic. ACCESS QUEUING ANALYSIS In addition to the capacity and level of service evaluations, vehicular queuing was analyzed for both Costco driveways during the weekday PM and weekend midday peak hours for the 2014 Background Traffic Conditions and 2014 Total Traffic Conditions scenarios. The 95th percentile queue lengths for both intersections are summarized in Table 10 and compared to the existing available storage. Appendix "G"provides the queuing analysis worksheets for these scenarios. Table 10: Queuing Analysis Summary—SW Dartmouth St/South Costco Driveway Weekday PM Peak ur Weekend Midday Peak Hour Available 2014 Back- 2014 Total 2014 Back- 2014 Total ntersection Movement Storage(ft) ground Traffic Traffic ground Traffic Traffic SW Dartmouth St& Eastbound Right-Turn 200 25 25 100 150 North Costco Driveway Northbound Left- 225 100 125 125 200 SW Dartmouth St& Turn South Costco Driveway Eastbound Left-Turn 100 150 250 275 400 Eastbound Right-Turn 100 25 50 100 100 Note:Queues rounded up to the nearest 25 feet As shown in Table 10, the anticipated 95th percentile queue lengths are anticipated to increase negligibly (by one to three cars) between the background and total traffic conditions for all movements except for the eastbound left-turn at the South Costco Driveway. The anticipated 95th percentile queue length increases from approximately 275 feet to 400 feet between the 2014 background conditions and total traffic conditions for the weekend midday peak hour. Right now, the approach is configured with an exclusive left-turn lane and an exclusive right-turn lane. In order to provide improved Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 30 operations and storage for this movement, the approach lanes on-site could be restriped to accommodate an exclusive left-turn lane and shared left-through turn lane with approximately 250 feet of storage. This improvement would reduce the queue to 250 feet under 2014 total traffic conditions during the weekend midday peak hour. A sketch showing this improvement is provided in Figure 10. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon TigardCostco Gasoline Addition August 2013 Us-'11`-'11.-'0,-'f/'-'11,-'11`-'11`-'11‘-'11'-'11,-'11,-'11`-'11,-'17`-'11`-')Wc 13 .III—fl 411.' . , '- 111PP omm '''',11.' ... .- • .4 j Will - --\ ! \ \ .. () • • _ :.:::;:=:- . _. 0._._,:::,,,y _,,.. \ •,-, • • !WI! ..../ ,.. , . ., Ito rot" - --1/\. r__„,::::::.. .... , \ 4i P % -41111 -410 * „......:::::. „ •e \ f.:::::-.:::.._. jt ., iii\ _1, • I., It(I-1i t.I - 11 -,'..- li 4 _. \ " - -..--\ n n .,.../ ,,,i) \ , ... — J I ...., _ _ Ar° 4 4100.— So ...',- s r'---,,, ... .. „. (-- .* A' —11. ,,-...)c•.) ( -Q... 1.--.0"_... \\$*4 lk.' U L 0) .... ......, • X1 0' 2 icr ._ ,,, .:_,7..__:_••=----- I ,,,-.:.• •,,•• \\, c•Ls , . ., STOP 4: - -1 -- --- . \\ ,..._— \ 1 ID I 1 . Ill 1 .• 1 -w-- — .— .. .....n n—o-in 6-,b . LUU 'tJ' L - Wei jp. tii L - _ e- c-(71.116 ^,4-•:. .. : 14 0 'N'' 4_ _- . - _ - n et . -I, . r 41 !loud 1,1 r gi _It , .1.. •'''' • • LI . R . C.I/i4 • ir„. 4. 1 :116 Nut lieTio 3. . .:• ' • R . ...... , ..c I _, _. mi, .... . ii: - li- I i .1,111, •-•---. 1 ' - , 1 OP .c----.."--- g il, ... .. . .-.. -- • - rin i ,.. .;.:' .. , •Illi ., .. .ta .:.., L . - 4 r - , A , • A - ,...1 di. 2 ... - •f D' ri..... I . •..\ .. . _4, .. . ._ „,„ ....... IN i .1 , Ali Lai vie.1`-----_-_-.- .• - „ ' ..., , , • ..---.r ' .*v. ' ",V. .. • , : ‘kikb... .v . Vomo h -441 , ,,'%-•,,,;,-;,,,',,, -I:K.'. — - ‘• sh. --. ...---• - -.•,.. _ laziaiiii.„/Li '--- -- . .• •-- -' ' - rt .,.. " bit ,.----.:. ., ... , ._,...,.. .. , 1.:. 2 z NOTE: DRAWING IS CONCEPTUAL SOUTH COSTCO DRIVEWAY IMPROVEMENT FIGURE TIGARD,OREGON 10 , _.... K\ KITTELSON&ASSOCIATES,INC. N. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERNG/PLANNNG Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 32 6.0 SITE PARKING SUPPLY & DEMAND Existing parking conditions on the Tigard Costco site were inventoried and observed during the weekend peak demand period to identify the existing parking supply and occupancy and to evaluate the impacts of the proposed parking changes associated with fuel station development. This evaluation included a review of existing parking inventories, peak hour occupancy, parking conditions, and the physical layout of existing parking facilities. The focus of the parking analysis was to inventory parking on the site, including the number of parking spaces available, and to obtain peak period parking demand counts to determine the current utilization of parking supply. To collect the parking data, the existing Tigard Costco site was divided into four zones, as illustrated in Figure 11, for ease of data collection, documentation, and refined analysis. EXISTING PARKING INVENTORY An inventory of existing parking supply was determined from on-site parking space counts. All spaces were identified by location. Under existing conditions, no designated on-street parking is permitted for the Costco warehouse and all parking demand is contained on the Costco property. Table 11 summarizes the existing parking inventory within the site area by sub-area. As summarized in Table 11, there are a total of 730 existing parking spaces located on site. Table 11 Existing Parking Inventory Summary Study Zone Parking Spaces 1 85 2 246 3 207 4 192 Total 730 EXISTING PARKING UTILIZATION Parking utilization measures the level of occupancy of the parking supply during a given time period. It is typically expressed in terms of a percentage of parking supply. To evaluate existing parking utilization rates at the Tigard Costco site, parking demand counts were conducted in October 2010. The weekend midday peak period (11:00 a.m. to 3:00 PM) was counted at half-hour intervals. This peak period was identified for evaluation based on the known trip generation characteristics at Costco warehouses.Trip generation characteristics and activity levels at Costco warehouses indicate that the weekend peak period generates the highest number of trips and is, therefore, expected to experience the highest parking demand.A complete summary of the parking data collected is provided as Appendix "H." Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 33 From the parking data collected, it was determined that the peak period of parking demand occurred during the weekend time period from 1:30 to 2:00 PM. Figure 11 also provides a summary of the parking utilization on the Costco site by study zone for this peak half hour period. As summarized in the figure, the parking lot in total was 92% utilized during the weekend peak period. Parking zones 2 and 4, which provide the closest access to the warehouse, were most highly utilized during the peak period (both at 99% utilization). EFFECTS OF PROPOSED FUEL STATION ON PARKING UTILIZATION Addition of the proposed Costco fuel station in the eastern portion of the site will result in a net reduction of 84 parking spaces in total on site. All of the parking spaces proposed to be removed due to the fuel station development are located in Zone 3, which is 93% utilized during the weekend peak half hour. Given that the site is essentially at capacity during the peak half hour period, the proposed reduction in on-site parking needs to be addressed so that adequate parking supply will still be available on site for Costco members and shoppers. The Costco Warehouse has developed agreements with neighboring property owners (such as the Regal Cinema on SW 72nd Avenue) to utilize their lots for employee parking during peak periods in order to free up sufficient space for Costco members and shoppers. During these peak periods, there can be approximately 100-120 Costco employees on site. Freeing up these spaces currently used by employees will greatly improve the availability of parking on-site. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon 11367 Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition August 2013 APA - .I'It. ,,i ' A , . ,.._,. . . ,c3s, :, . _ ,_ . .. . . f . _ ..„2::,_...,... . szeits"4 , . . \ lo-Z-ONE 2 .,..." . .. " ,t r� - T PARKING SUPPLY • 93% ra PARKING DEMA-_e, r'..i � t` PARKING SUPPLY=207 ' ' • r. Z , PARKING DEMAND=192 filk. 4,111°04_‘..411,,_ -_.....-. .. . Q v 1.0%,1" ik% ..,. ZONE 1 ZONE 4 `S S - .. COSTCO 56% WHOLESALE 99% PARKING SUPPLY=85 - 2 PARKING DEMAND=48 PARKING SUPPLY=1? - PARKING DEMAND=191 '-. m 3 o - CENTER TOTAL '. SUPPLY = 730 0 DEMAND = 664 0 UTILIZATION = 92% U r. H m WEEKEND MIDDAY PEAK HALF HOUR PARKING DEMAND Figure TIGARD, OREGON 11 a I /1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES,RINC. Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 35 7.0 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of this transportation impact analysis, the proposed Costco Gasoline fuel station addition to the existing Tigard Costco site can be developed while maintaining acceptable operations on the surrounding transportation system and within the site. The study resulted in the following findings and recommendations: Existing Conditions ■ Under existing conditions all of the study intersections operate within volume-to-capacity and LOS standards during the weekday PM and weekend midday peak hours, with the exception of the intersection of OR 99W/Dartmouth Street-SW 78th Avenue. Several movements at the northbound and southbound approaches are operating at a LOS F and/or v/c ratio over 1.0 during both the weekday PM and weekend midday peak hours. Therefore, operations at the intersection do not meet City of Tigard standards. ■ Historical crash data from ODOT for the last five years identified a total of 137 crashes at the study intersections, none of which resulted in fatalities. Less than half the crashes were identified as injury crashes. o The study intersections along the OR 99W corridor experienced relatively high numbers of rear-end type crashes. o The intersection of OR 99W and SW 72nd Avenue experienced relatively high numbers of turning type crashes and a higher numbers of injury crashes than the other study intersections along OR 99W. This is likely due to the fact that the intersection is skewed and the northbound and southbound left-turns were previously permitted phasing. The northbound and southbound left-turns have recently been converted to permitted + protected phasing. 2014 Background Traffic Conditions ■ A 0.5-percent per year annual growth rate was used to forecast year 2014 conditions for the ODOT intersections along OR 99W, and a 2-percent per year annual growth rate was used to forecast year 2014 conditions for the remaining City of Tigard intersections along SW Dartmouth Street. ■ Under the 2014 Background Conditions scenario (i.e., not including the proposed Costco Gasoline development), all of the study intersections were found to continue to operate within applicable standards with the exception of the intersection of OR 99W/Dartmouth Street-SW 78th Avenue, which does not meet the City of Tigard Standards. Several movements on the northbound and southbound approaches to the intersection are Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 36 projected to operate at a LOS F and/or v/c ratio over 1.0 during both the weekday PM and weekend midday peak hours, as under existing conditions. Proposed Development Plan ■ The proposed development plan calls for the addition of a Costco Gasoline fuel station as an ancillary use to the existing Costco development located on SW Dartmouth Street. ■ The proposed site plan consists of an 18 fueling position fuel station located in the northeastern portion of the site, just south of the site's northern-most access to SW Dartmouth Street. ■ Overall the development plan will result in a net parking reduction of 84 stalls. ■ No changes to the location or number of site access points are proposed. ■ The proposed Costco Gasoline fuel station is expected to generate approximately 430 total trip ends and 90 net new trip ends during the weekday PM peak hour. ■ The proposed Costco Gasoline fuel station is expected to generate approximately 460 total trip ends and 110 net new trip ends during the weekend midday peak hour. 2014 Total Traffic Conditions ■ Under the 2014 Total Traffic Conditions scenario, all of the study intersections were found to operate within standards, with the exception of the intersection of OR 99W/Dartmouth Street-SW 78th Avenue, which does not meet the City of Tigard Standards. Several movements on the northbound and southbound approaches to the intersection are projected to operate at a LOS F and/or v/c ratio over 1.0 during both the weekday PM and weekend midday peak hours, as under existing and 2014 background conditions. o This forecast condition has been previously identified as a future need and an improvement is outlined in the City of Tigard Transportation System Plan. The transportation impact fees that will be contributed by the development will be contributions to the funding and completion of these improvements. Access Operations & On-Site Circulation ■ The operations of site-access driveways were reviewed to ensure that adequate intersection sight distance can be maintained for vehicles exiting the site. ■ Both driveways will be able to provide adequate sight distance. ■ Landscaping should be monitored to verify it does not limit sight distance. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 37 ■ Internal circulation was evaluated as part of this study to ensure that the site provides sufficient on-site circulation for pedestrian movements and internal site traffic. ■ Truck routes and turning templates were also reviewed to ensure safe and efficient truck circulation for the proposed fuel station. ■ Vehicular queuing was analyzed for the right-in/right-out North Costco Driveway and signalized South Costco Driveway on SW Dartmouth Street. o The queuing impacts from the proposed gas station traffic are not expected to be a hindrance to safe efficient operations at the North Costco Driveway. o The queue from the eastbound left-turn at the South Costco Driveway is anticipated to exceed the available storage under all future analysis scenarios. To mitigate this, the eastbound approach can be restriped to accommodate an exclusive left-turn lane and shared left-through turn lane with approximately 250 feet of storage. Site Parking Supply & Demand ■ There are a total of 730 existing parking spaces located on site. ■ During the peak half hour of activity on the weekend, the site's parking was 92% utilized. ■ Addition of the proposed Costco fuel station in the eastern portion of the site will result in a net reduction of 84 parking spaces in total on site and a revised total parking supply of 646 spaces ■ Given that the site is essentially at capacity during the peak half hour period, the proposed reduction in on-site parking needs to be addressed so that adequate parking supply will still be available on site for Costco members and shoppers. ■ Costco will pursue agreements with neighboring property owners (such as the Regal Cinema on SW 72nd Avenue) to utilize their lots for employee parking during peak periods in order to free up sufficient space for Costco members. Based on the results of this study it can be concluded that the proposed Costco Gasoline fuel station addition to the existing Costco site on SW Dartmouth Street can be developed while still maintaining safe and acceptable operations at the study intersections provided the recommended mitigation measures are implemented. We trust that this report addresses the transportation impacts associated with the proposed Tigard Costco Gasoline fuel station development located in Tigard, Oregon and meets the requirements outlined by the City and ODOT. Please contact us at 1-866-900-2683 or shennum@kittelson.com if you have any questions or require additional information. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#:11367 August 5,2013 Page 38 REFERENCES 1. Oregon Department of Transportation. OHP Policy 1F Revisions. Adopted by the Oregon Transportation Commission: December 21, 2011. 2. Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual. 2000. 3. City of Tigard. 2035 Transportation System Plan. 2010. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Appendix A Traffic Count Data Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: SW 72nd Ave--SW Dartmouth St QC JOB#: 10973701 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE: Tue,Jun 04 2013 266 410 Peak-Hour: 4:55 PM--5:55 PM i t 0.0.a o.2 29 139 98 1 Peak 15-Min: 5:05 PM--5:20 PM i t i 4 0.0 1.0 525*31 J t 86*513 J i ~ 1. 0A 0.0 t 0.0 0A 157* 0.90 * 263 •* 0.0 0.4 307* 119 i il t r 164* 296 7 - 0.0 0.0 fi t r, 0.6 0.3 233 293 41 Quality tullkQ• n �0.4 0.3 0.01-- • 422 567 T RAN SPQR TA.TION DATA i t COL LECTIOFd SERVICES 0.2 0.4 _1 3 L -1 r i 4 L o J t o 1 AX I 0 0 * 4. 0 STOP j 1 1 ;,mP z r o 1-- , -1 1 2 0 1 • NA *J i 4 I -] J i 4 L . ., 4:).t . STOP 1 T. STOP J ■ t * •* * 4.NA NA NA w w NA * i /r * i r -141 t i t � --lob .1- 1.4 1-- NA NA 5-Min Count SW 72nd Ave SW 72nd Ave SW Dartmouth St SW Dartmouth St Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U 4:00 PM 7 21 1 0 7 8 0 3 9 7 0 7 22 6 0 101 4:05 PM 15 23 3 0 10 13 1 0 2 15 12 0 8 13 1 0 116 4:10 PM 14 21 1 0 10 17 1 0 2 16 8 0 6 20 9 0 125 4:15 PM 20 18 5 0 5 11 3 0 4 9 3 0 6 28 5 0 117 4:20 PM 6 19 4 0 14 11 2 0 1 18 10 0 8 16 3 0 112 4:25 PM 15 22 3 0 7 12 6 0 4 13 9 0 11 17 7 0 126 4:30 PM 7 17 2 0 4 28 2 0 3 14 11 0 10 23 3 0 124 4:35 PM 13 21 3 0 6 13 1 0 1 13 8 0 13 22 4 0 118 4:40 PM 17 21 2 0 7 14 4 0 1 12 9 0 13 17 3 0 120 4:45 PM 13 18 5 0 5 15 8 0 3 9 7 0 5 14 4 0 106 4:50 PM 22 15 3 0 7 12 1 0 4 18 16 0 8 21 5 0 132 4:55 PM 13 26 1 0 8 9 1 0 4 12 14 0 3 20 4 0 115 1412 5:00 PM 18 17 2 0 9 11 2 0 2 11 6 0 14 25 7 0 124 1435 5:05 PM 22 26 2 0 2 14 2 0 0 20 12 0 15 25 13 0 153 1472 5:10 PM 18 24 2 0 14 18 3 0 3 14 9 0 10 25 6 0 146 1493 5:15 PM 18 27 1 0 17 11 3 0 2 14 17 0 16 23 10 0 159 1535 5:20 PM 20 31 4 0 5 3 3 0 0 16 10 0 17 25 8 0 142 1565 5:25 PM 25 23 8 0 5 13 1 0 3 8 5 0 10 26 5 0 132 1571 5:30 PM 17 29 8 0 5 15 4 0 2 11 9 0 15 17 9 0 141 1588 5:35 PM 25 25 4 0 4 12 2 0 4 13 6 0 13 21 6 0 135 1605 5:40 PM 23 19 1 0 5 8 2 0 4 14 9 0 23 20 5 0 133 1618 5:45 PM 15 24 6 0 9 12 4 0 3 12 10 0 15 19 7 0 136 1648 5:50 PM 19 22 2 0 15 13 2 0 4 12 12 0 13 17 6 0 137 1653 5:55 PM 9 11 7 0 5 15 4 0 2 13 9 0 10 12 4 0 101 1639 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates I Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U I Total All Vehicles 232 308 20 0 132 172 32 0 20 192 152 0 164 292 116 0 1832 Heavy Trucks 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 12 Pedestrians 0 4 0 0 4 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/18/2013 5:30 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: SW 72nd Ave--SW Dartmouth St QC JOB#: 10973702 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE: Sat, Jun 01 2013 362 255 Peak-Hour: 1:50 PM--2:50 PM i * 0.3 2.4 52 192 118 Peak 15-Min: 1:55 PM--2:10 PM i t i 4 0.0 0.0 0.8 38141 45 J t 23.220 J i 4 1. 0.5 0.0 t 0.0 0.0 41. 172* 0.97 152 •• �c 0.0 0.0 389* 172 i * r r 45+ 319 + 7 0.0 0.0 fi * 0.0 0.6 178 187 29 Quality i * ull k Counts1.1 3.2 3.4 410 394 T RAN SPQR TA.TION DATA 4 4 COL LECTIOFd SERVICES 0.0 2.3 ___1 0 L 0 . 0 J 4 4 L 0 t 0 1 I AX I 0 0 . •. 12PD 4. 0 STOP j �► :Alp z r 1 �, * 2 1-- � � 1 2 0 1 • NA 4 J i 4 I —4, J i 4 «` 4,),, • STOP 1 T. STOP J t MI NA NA NA w w NA * h .1- P NA NA i 4 5-Min Count SW 72nd Ave SW 72nd Ave SW Dartmouth St SW Dartmouth St Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U 1:00 PIS 23 15 1 0 8 19 4 0 2 12 10 0 6 11 4 0 115 1334 1:05 PM 18 10 2 0 8 17 5 0 0 19 19 0 5 10 5 0 118 1348 1:10 PM 13 16 2 0 9 10 4 0 5 22 12 0 4 15 3 0 115 1352 1:15 PM 11 8 1 0 7 7 4 0 5 13 11 0 5 14 1 0 87 1330 1:20 PM 10 19 6 0 7 23 2 0 2 11 14 0 7 10 7 0 118 1332 1:25 PM 16 11 3 0 7 12 3 0 1 16 15 0 4 14 0 0 102 1318 1:30 PM 15 15 2 0 10 12 2 0 5 14 11 0 2 11 1 0 100 1303 1:35 PM 10 23 2 0 15 15 2 0 4 11 13 0 1 9 3 0 108 1303 1:40 PM 11 15 4 0 9 19 3 0 3 8 15 0 4 19 2 0 112 1302 1:45 PM 7 19 2 0 8 14 4 0 7 17 15 0 4 9 0 0 106 1306 1:50 PM 16 9 4 0 9 18 3 0 4 14 13 0 2 15 1 0 108 1302 1:55 PM 16 14 4 0 8 12 4 0 1 14 20 0 2 9 2 0 106 1295 2:00 PM 15 21 3 0 10 17 6 0 7 12 9 0 5 15 3 0 123 1303 2:05 PM 17 14 1 0 8 25 6 0 2 12 11 0 5 18 4 0 123 1308 2:10 PM 16 15 4 0 10 12 1 0 3 16 12 0 4 11 2 0 106 1299 2:15 PM 15 14 8 0 12 17 3 0 3 12 19 0 3 11 2 0 119 1331 2:20 PM 13 16 2 0 7 22 3 0 3 18 14 0 3 6 1 0 108 1321 2:25 PM 13 13 1 1 8 11 3 0 4 14 16 0 5 7 3 0 99 1318 2:30 PM 12 14 0 0 13 17 5 0 4 15 18 0 6 18 0 0 122 1340 2:35 PM 15 24 1 0 14 14 7 0 4 19 13 0 1 10 1 0 123 1355 2:40 PM 16 17 1 0 9 7 3 0 4 10 16 0 4 16 3 0 106 1349 2:45 PM 13 16 0 0 10 20 8 0 6 16 11 0 5 16 1 0 122 1365 2:50 PM 17 7 4 0 15 15 3 0 2 8 11 0 2 7 2 0 93 1350 2:55 PM 14 19 0 0 9 15 5 0 3 15 13 0 4 9 2 0 108 1352 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates I Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U I Total All Vehicles 192 196 32 0 104 216 64 0 40 152 160 0 48 168 36 0 1408 Heavy Trucks 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/18/2013 5:30 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: SW Dartmouth St--South Costco Dwy QC JOB#: 10973703 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE:Tue,Jun 04 2013 286 602 Peak-Hour: 4:55 PM --5:55 PM i t Peak 15-Min: 4:55 PM--5:10 PM • 26 260 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 4+ i 4 41 . 4 237«225 i 0♦ 0 0.0 ♦0.0 : 0.0♦ 0.0 0 ♦ 0.92 �` o o.o ♦ + 0.0 390♦ 165;h * e r 0~ 0 i 1 r 0.0 0.0 h * 0.0 0.0 211 377 0 i * Quality �I4, 7 0.0 0.5 0.0 425 588 T RAN SPQRTATION DATA i t COL LECTIOFd SERVICES 0.0 0.3 0 2 0 __I 0 L IJ i 4I 0 1 t. o 2 1 X I 8 0 . 125D `4. 0 74.o. J 1 r 0 h t r 0 1 0 2 0 p li. * NA 1 —J NA J 4 4 • 1 •t 1TT 1 _ t NA i O« NA NA �� « NA * 1 t • 1 i ti * r ti t r• 7 . NA * 7 NA7 5-Min Count SW Dartmouth St SW Dartmouth St South Costco Dwy South Costco Dwy Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U 4:00 NA 12 22 0 0 0 17 2 0 16 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 84 4:05 PM 5 23 0 0 0 24 4 0 16 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 81 4:10 PM 10 33 0 0 0 31 1 0 10 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 100 4:15 PM 15 29 0 0 0 20 1 0 21 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 95 4:20 PM 10 25 0 0 0 26 3 0 13 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 88 4:25 PM 17 15 0 0 0 25 0 0 9 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 78 4:30 PM 7 30 0 0 0 34 1 0 14 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 99 4:35 PM 13 36 0 0 0 16 4 0 9 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 86 4:40 PM 19 24 0 0 0 23 0 0 13 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 90 4:45 PM 15 19 0 0 0 28 3 0 12 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 87 4:50 PM 13 28 0 0 0 31 0 0 16 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 102 4:55 PM 15 40-6 0 0 ' 4 0 13 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 106 1096 5:00 PM 17 29 0 0 0 20 4 0 17 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 100 1112 5:05 PM 26 36 0 0 0 16 0 0 36 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 137 1168 5:10 PM 16 27 0 0 0 20 1 0 17 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 99 1167 5:15 PM 15 30 0 0 0 27 1 0 19 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 106 1178 5:20 PM 22 31 0 0 0 26 2 0 22 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 113 1203 5:25 PM 15 42 0 0 0 17 5 0 16 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 100 1225 5:30 PM 13 23 0 0 0 22 3 0 16 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 95 1221 5:35 PM 20 35 0 0 0 16 1 0 21 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 101 1236 5:40 PM 22 32 0 0 0 28 3 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 107 1253 5:45 PM 14 23 0 0 0 23 2 0 19 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 94 1260 5:50 PM 16 29 0 0 0 24 0 0 18 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 106 1264 5:55 PM 8 15 0 0 0 16 2 0 20 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 73 1231 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates I Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U I Total All Vehicles 232 420 0 0 0 228 32 0 264 0 196 0 0 0 0 0 1372 Heavy Trucks 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Pedestrians 0 0 0 12 12 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/18/2013 5:30 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: SW Dartmouth St--South Costco Dwy QC JOB#: 10973704 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE: Sat, Jun 01 2013 458 559 Peak-Hour: 1:45 PM--2:45 PM i I' 0.2 0.4 51 407 o Peak 15-Min: 2:30 PM--2:45 PM a J i 4 0.0 0.2 0.0 J ti J i 4 41. 279 320 0 0 1.1 0.6 J 0.0« 0.0 0 * 0.94 �" o * • 0.0 0.0 530* 210 1 * + 0* 0 * 7 r 0A 0.0 fi * 0.0 0.0 228 239 0 1-- • * Quality �I 1.3 0.0 0.0 617 467 T RAN SPQR TA.TION DATA 4 4 COLLECTION SERVICES 0.2 0.6 _1 0 L 1 1 0 r 4 4. 1 J i o L x .1 1 . r 1 * 0 6 1-- -1 1 1 0 J i 4 1 • NA 4 I — J a 4 * \ * 4.NA NA NA w w NA * z \/r • z r -141 *i * � --lob .1- r• � NA NA 5-Min Count SW Dartmouth St SW Dartmouth St South Costco Dwy South Costco Dwy Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U 1:00 PM 24 24 0 0 0 26 0 0 31 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 119 1381 1:05 PM 22 27 0 0 0 34 3 0 23 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 133 1391 1:10 PM 20 13 0 0 0 35 5 0 25 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 119 1395 1:15 PM 12 16 0 0 0 26 1 0 25 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 101 1374 1:20 PM 17 17 0 0 0 25 6 1 23 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 105 1371 1:25 PM 17 15 0 0 0 31 1 0 25 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 111 1375 1:30 PM 15 19 0 0 0 33 1 0 18 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 106 1366 1:35 PM 14 18 0 0 0 33 3 0 19 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 103 1348 1:40 PM 19 19 0 0 0 33 2 0 23 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 111 1336 1:45 PM 9 20 0 0 0 34 7 0 30 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 124 1355 1:50 PM 27 23 0 0 0 30 3 0 21 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 127 1367 1:55 PM 20 15 0 0 0 42 3 0 25 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 121 1380 2:00 PM 26 17 0 0 0 35 1 0 16 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 104 1365 2:05 PM 23 28 0 0 0 34 6 0 25 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 131 1363 2:10 PM 12 22 0 0 0 31 4 0 20 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 112 1356 2:15 PM 17 16 0 0 0 35 1 0 28 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 112 1367 2:20 PM 15 23 0 0 0 32 7 0 23 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 116 1378 2:25 PM 13 16 0 0 0 32 4 0 35 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 120 1387 2:30 PM 21 19 0 0 0 41 4 0 29 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 131 1412 2:35 PM 21 21 0 0 0 26 7 0 33 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 127 1436 2:40 PM 24 19 0 0 0 35 4 0 35 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 130 1455 2:45 PM 22 18 0 0 0 39 0 0 23 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 116 1447 2:50 PM 13 20 0 0 0 31 1 0 26 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 100 1420 2:55 PM 22 24 0 0 0 36 4 0 21 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 127 1426 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Total All Vehicles 264 236 0 0 0 408 60 0 388 0 196 0 0 0 0 0 1552 Heavy Trucks 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 16 Pedestrians 0 0 0 8 8 Bicycles 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/18/2013 5:30 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: SW Dartmouth St--North Costco Dwy QC JOB#: 10973705 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE:Tue,Jun 04 2013 477 599 Peak-Hour: 4:30 PM --5:30 PM i I' 0.0 0.2 205 272 o 1 4. Peak 15-Min: 5:15 PM--5:30 PM i * i 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 J t • J •i 4 205• 0 1 1 0.0 0.0 J 0.0« 0.0 •0 0.94 �" 0 * • 0.0 0.0 • 1 r • 61 61 * 0 2 0.0 0.0 7 fi * 0.0 0.0 0 598 2 1-- • * Quality �I4, 0.0 0.2 0.0 333 600 T RAN SPQR TA.TION DATA i 4 COL LECTIOFd SERVICES 0.0 0.2 ___1 0 L -1 r 4 4 L o J i 0 01 iA I 3 0 . 4. 0 41 1 :,oP 1 : :� °°p 01- l • NA 4 J i 4 I NA —4, J i 4 . ., /\t • STOP I I. ' i * , * 4.NA NA NA w w NA * z \/r • z r 7 ., • * � --lob .1- I., 1-- NA NA * 5-Min Count SW Dartmouth St SW Dartmouth St North Costco Dwy North Costco Dwy Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U 4:00 PIS 0 48 0 0 0 25 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 84 4:05 PM 0 39 0 0 0 23 23 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 87 4:10 PM 0 41 1 0 0 25 12 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 85 4:15 PM 0 57 0 0 0 26 20 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 106 4:20 PM 0 44 0 0 0 26 19 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 92 4:25 PM 0 26 1 0 0 21 16 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 67 4:30 PM 0 42 0 0 0 36 13 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 94 4:35 PM 0 48 0 0 0 18 24 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 98 4:40 PM 0 40 0 0 0 19 22 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 83 4:45 PM 0 30 0 0 0 28 14 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 77 4:50 PM 0 45 0 0 0 26 13 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 94 4:55 PM 0 55 0 0 0 17 26 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 102 1069 5:00 PM 0 54 1 0 0 23 12 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 98 1083 5:05 PM 0 64 0 0 0 16 14 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 95 1091 5:10 PM 0 56 0 0 0 20 15 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 96 1102 5:15 PM 0 52 0 0 0 23 15 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 97 1093 5:20 PM 0 53 1 0 0 24 18 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 99 1100 5:25 PM 0 59 0 0 0 22 19 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 106 1139 5:30 PM 0 38 0 0 0 22 18 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 80 1125 5:35 PM 0 51 1 0 0 15 11 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 82 1109 5:40 PM 0 46 0 0 0 25 13 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 90 1116 5:45 PM 0 45 0 0 0 24 10 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 82 1121 5:50 PM 0 49 1 0 0 19 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 77 1104 5:55 PM 0 34 0 0 0 16 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 63 1065 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Total All Vehicles 0 656 4 0 0 276 208 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 1208 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/18/2013 5:30 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: SW Dartmouth St--North Costco Dwy QC JOB#: 10973706 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE: Sat, Jun 01 2013 768 658 Peak-Hour: 2:00 PM--3:00 PM i * 0.4 0.6 407 361 o 1 Peak 15-Min: 2:30 PM--2:45 PM i * i 4 0.7 0.0 0.0 J t • J i 4 407• 0 3 3 0.7 0.0 J � 0.0« 0.0 •0 0.95 �" 0 * • 0.0 0.0 • 196* 196 i * r 0 3 * 7 r • 1.0 1.0 fi * 0.0 0.0 0 655 3 * ullkQ• �I4, �0.0 0.6 0.01-- • 557 658 T RAN SPQR TA.TION DATA 4 4 COL LECTIOFd SERVICES 0.4 0.6 _1 0 L o 1 0 r 4 4 L o J i 0 0 i' ll JA 10 0 0 ► L ° ti t r` 0 o z a 1 • 4 NA J i 4 I —i. 4.0 i 4 . J t , STOP I I. ' i MI * ,4. * 4.NA NA NA w w NA * 1 \/r • 1 r 7 • * * � --1 .1--1 .1t IT — NA NA 5-Min Count SW Dartmouth St SW Dartmouth St North Costco Dwy North Costco Dwy Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U 1:00 Pry 0 59 0 0 0 22 3n 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 124 1498 1:05 PM 0 55 0 0 0 32 41 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 141 1522 1:10 PM 0 48 0 0 0 29 33 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 124 1519 1:15 PM 0 45 0 0 0 28 41 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 126 1507 1:20 PM 0 52 0 0 0 27 33 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 124 1507 1:25 PM 0 41 0 0 0 20 39 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 115 1499 1:30 PM 0 42 0 0 0 31 33 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 118 1479 1:35 PM 0 40 1 0 0 29 41 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 1 0 126 1483 1:40 PM 0 49 1 0 0 26 49 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 136 1492 1:45 PM 0 44 0 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 122 1501 1:50 PM 0 51 0 0 0 40 30 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 128 1496 1:55 PM 0 39 0 0 0 40 32 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 116 1500 2:00 PM 0 35 0 0 0 36 33 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 118 1494 2:05 PM 0 60 0 0 0 35 43 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 151 1504 2:10 PM 0 61 0 0 0 21 27 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 133 1513 2:15 PM 0 42 1 0 0 30 35 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 1 0 128 1515 2:20 PM 0 60 1 0 0 26 42 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 142 1533 2:25 PM 0 53 0 0 0 39 34 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 1 0 141 1559 2:30 PM 0 58 0 0 0 26 35 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 138 1579 2:35 PM 0 70 0 0 0 27 30 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 142 1595 2:40 PM 0 58 1 0 0 35 37 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 149 1608 2:45 PM 0 52 0 0 0 36 34 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 138 1624 2:50 PM 0 50 0 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 1 0 113 1609 2:55 PM 0 56 0 0 0 25 32 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 132 1625 Peak 15-Min I Northbound Southbound Eastbound 1 Westbound Flowrates I Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U I Left Thru Riaht U I Total All Vehicles 0 744 4 0 0 352 408 0 0 0 208 0 0 0 0 0 1716 Heavy Trucks 0 8 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/18/2013 5:30 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: SW 72nd Ave--SW Pacific Hwy QC JOB#: 10973707 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE:Tue,Jun 04 2013 295 271 Peak-Hour: 4:40 PM --5:40 PM l 0 * Peak 15-Min: 4:55 PM--5:10 PM a * 103 83 109 0.0 1.2 0.0 4J # 4 J •i 4 1836 108: i 25«1706 2.3 +0.0 1 4.0♦ 2.6 12734 0.97 ♦1577 2.7 • 2.6 • 1445 64 ; �r 1041568 . 1 r + 2A 1.6 h * i* 1.9 2A 7156 138 186 Quality i * Ula k �I 7 0.6 0.0 1.6 251 480 IRAN SPQRTATION DATA • t COL LECTIOFd SERVICES 1.6 0.8 _1 3 L 1 0 2 0 J * 4 l 0 1 i o 0 r A I 17 3 • • 1 IF.440. 4 1► , r 0 h t el. 0 8 4— 0 0 1 p 1 1 • * _, NA —4 NA d i 4 J •i 4 • 1t 'l T r 1 — t NA i O« NA NA �� « NA • 1 r • 1 r ti * r ti * r• 7 7 i NA * p NA 5-Min Count SW 72nd Ave SW 72nd Ave SW Pacific Hwy SW Pacific Hwy Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U 4:00 PM 7 11 Tl 0 11 5 6 0 9 99 4 0 3 98 2 0 266 4:05 PM 5 7 16 0 6 10 7 0 8 80 4 0 14 124 0 0 281 4:10 PM 10 8 13 0 11 6 7 0 13 116 4 0 7 121 2 0 318 4:15 PM 6 6 15 0 10 10 10 0 12 93 8 0 8 129 2 0 309 4:20 PM 6 10 12 0 8 5 7 0 9 99 6 0 8 128 2 0 300 4:25 PM 7 13 21 0 12 12 12 0 7 106 6 0 9 140 0 0 345 4:30 PM 9 7 14 0 9 7 9 0 7 96 2 0 11 123 1 0 295 4:35 PM 7 7 9 0 12 8 6 0 7 94 4 0 11 116 5 0 286 4:40 PM 8 12 16 0 11 9 10 0 6 93 3 0 15 136 2 0 321 4:45 PM 5 12 13 0 7 6 5 0 8 116 7 0 7 143 0 0 329 4:50 PM 7 14 9 0 5 7 12 0 7 110 4 0 9 120 5 0 309 4:55 PM 11 5 19 0 5 3 13 0 13 127 8 0 11 129 3 0 347 3706 5:00 PM 12 11 14 0 10 13 13 0 6 100 6 0 2 142 2 0 331 3771 5:05 PM I 27 12 11 0 11 5 5 0 13 106 6 0 7 130 1 0 334 3824 5:10 PM 13 15 15 0 11 11 9 0 9 106 4 0 14 104 3 0 314 3820 5:15 PM 11 5 17 0 10 8 5 0 5 108 6 0 13 141 4 0 333 3844 5:20 PM 17 16 20 0 6 2 9 0 7 86 3 0 7 147 2 0 322 3866 5:25 PM 12 14 17 0 10 5 8 0 11 121 4 0 5 127 2 0 336 3857 5:30 PM 14 10 9 0 12 7 4 0 15 114 8 0 9 130 1 0 333 3895 5:35 PM 19 12 26 0 11 7 10 0 8 86 5 0 5 128 0 0 317 3926 5:40 PM 12 11 15 0 8 15 6 0 12 81 5 0 3 126 3 0 297 3902 5:45 PM 12 11 14 0 11 5 2 0 8 99 10 0 4 116 1 0 293 3866 5:50 PM 13 7 8 0 5 6 6 0 4 85 5 0 10 136 2 0 287 3844 5:55 PM 7 6 13 0 5 6 5 0 7 114 4 0 9 140 4 0 320 3817 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Total All Vehicles 200 112 176 0 104 84 124 0 128 1332 80 0 80 1604 24 0 4048 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 4 0 16 0 72 Pedestrians 16 4 0 12 32 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/18/2013 5:30 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: SW 72nd Ave--SW Pacific Hwy QC JOB#: 10973708 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE: Sat,Jun 01 2013 301 264 Peak-Hour: 12:15 PM-- 1:15 PM •0 t Peak 15-Min: 1:00 PM-- 1:15 PM • 109 81 111 2.8 0.0 0.9 v 4 4 1480.128 1 t • 38 1448 APP + 4 2.4 ♦2.3 : t 2.6♦ 2.2 1049♦ 0.97 •1287 3.3 ♦ + 2A • 1255 78 7 h * r 123 1346 3.1 ♦ 1.3 i h * �r 0.0♦ 2.9 84 98 186 I # * Quality Counts1.2 0.0 1.6 282 368 TIN DATA + 4 COL LECTIOFd SERVICES 0.4 1.1 _1 4 L 1 00 0 J i 4 l 0 1 t 0 0 1 A I 26 0 * 125D `t' 2 4.0. 4 1. , r 3 h t fi 0 2 4— 0 0 1 p 1 1 • * _. NA —0 NA J 4 I • 1 •t IF 4] T 1 1 — t NA i O« NA NA PI « NA * 1 4 • 1 C 7it * 77 ~ t � 7 NA NA 5-Min Count SW 72nd Ave SW 72nd Ave SW Pacific Hwy SW Pacific Hwy Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U 1 :00 PM 6 7 11 0 7 3 16 0 7 100 6 0 5 97 5 0 270 12:05 PM 6 12 7 0 10 7 8 0 14 100 8 0 6 101 4 0 283 12:10 PM 11 11 13 0 14 8 17 0 12 75 11 0 14 92 0 0 278 12:15 PM 6 8 13 0 9 5 3 0 7 96 5 0 15 103 1 0 271 12:20 PM 6 11 23 0 6 4 15 0 13 101 7 0 7 114 5 0 312 12:25 PM 5 7 15 0 15 7 13 0 15 74 5 0 7 91 3 0 257 12:30 PM 7 6 14 0 15 7 14 0 13 74 5 0 10 104 4 0 273 12:35 PM 5 5 16 0 9 5 8 0 11 100 6 0 18 108 3 0 294 12:40 PM 9 15 17 0 3 6 10 0 13 83 5 0 8 87 6 0 262 12:45 PM 10 7 13 0 14 7 10 0 10 76 6 0 13 95 4 0 265 12:50 PM 9 11 13 0 8 6 8 0 8 87 6 0 10 134 3 0 303 12:55 PM 13 8 18 0 5 3 5 0 9 86 11 0 6 98 1 0 263 3331 1:00 PM 3 8 5 0 14 9 10 0 7 76 6 0 14 113 0 0 265 3326 1:05 PM 2 2 19 0 6 16 6 0 6 95 6 0 4 128 3 0 293 3336 1:10 PM 9 10 20 0 7 6 7 0 16 101 10 0 11 112 5 0 314 3372 1:15 PM 6 9 12 0 8 9 6 0 11 69 7 0 7 86 0 0 230 3331 1:20 PM 5 4 17 0 12 7 8 0 7 95 2 0 17 119 4 0 297 3316 1:25 PM 6 7 14 0 9 2 7 0 17 103 9 0 14 113 6 0 307 3366 1:30 PM 4 3 14 0 14 7 6 0 8 62 3 0 11 68 2 0 202 3295 1:35 PM 7 5 11 0 12 8 6 0 13 90 8 0 13 122 1 0 296 3297 1:40 PM 5 14 17 0 8 8 7 0 16 80 6 0 3 91 2 0 257 3292 1:45 PM 9 15 15 0 6 7 5 0 6 82 5 0 9 93 3 0 255 3282 1:50 PM 8 6 10 0 13 10 15 0 7 76 6 0 8 87 5 0 251 3230 1:55 PM 3 4 14 0 5 8 6 0 8 90 6 0 16 126 4 0 290 3257 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Total All Vehicles 56 80 176 0 108 124 92 0 116 1088 88 0 116 1412 32 0 3488 Heavy Trucks 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 36 0 100 Pedestrians 0 0 0 8 8 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/18/2013 5:30 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: SW Dartmouth St--SW Pacific Hwy QC JOB#: 10973709 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE:Tue,Jun 04 2013 268 249 Peak-Hour: 4:40 PM --5:40 PM i * 1.5 0.0 40 92 136 Peak 15-Min: 5:15 PM--5:30 PM i t i 4 10.0 0.0 0.0 2136 73 J t • 12 1822 J i 4 1. 2.2 0.0 t 0.0 2.3 1273* 0.97 .1743 •• • 2.6 2.4 • 1634* 288 i * r 67 1478 * 7 - 2.0 0.0 fi * 14, 0.0 2.2 353 164 68 I } Counts i * Ula k0.3 0.0 0.0 446 585 IRAN SPQR TA TION DATA 4 4 COL LECTIOFd SERVICES 0.0 0.2 _1 2 L o 0 0 r 4 4 o J t o or A I 4 3 . 4. 1 I YL 0 ' .1 * f` 0 1 , o o a l • NA *J i 4 I — J i 4 NA NA NA w w NA >.t • ism 4.• 1 \/r • 1 r -141 i * * � --I .1 * IT — NA NA 5-Min Count SW Dartmouth St SW Dartmouth St SW Pacific Hwy SW Pacific Hwy Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U 4:00 PM 26 13 4 0 15 9 0 2 99 16 0 6 116 0 312 4:05 PM 20 6 2 0 13 9 7 0 7 102 28 0 10 110 0 0 314 4:10 PM 25 11 4 0 8 6 3 0 4 131 19 0 3 140 0 0 354 4:15 PM 33 10 2 0 5 7 4 0 1 86 25 0 3 132 1 0 309 4:20 PM 29 12 4 0 14 14 0 0 7 101 26 0 8 140 1 0 356 4:25 PM 33 6 5 0 10 10 5 0 3 111 21 0 4 137 1 0 346 4:30 PM 32 13 4 0 7 5 1 0 7 98 40 0 4 132 0 0 343 4:35 PM 28 12 2 0 13 9 9 0 6 102 24 0 5 130 1 0 341 4:40 PM 26 8 3 0 11 7 4 0 6 118 29 0 3 143 0 0 358 4:45 PM 25 6 2 0 12 8 5 0 1 108 28 0 4 139 2 0 340 4:50 PM 17 9 6 0 6 7 3 0 9 114 25 0 5 130 1 0 332 4:55 PM 30 13 9 0 8 7 3 0 10 104 31 0 5 141 1 0 362 4067 5:00 PM 33 17 7 0 12 8 2 0 6 101 23 0 6 155 2 0 372 4127 5:05 PM 40 21 5 0 15 11 6 0 5 104 18 0 3 139 0 0 367 4180 5:10 PM 29 10 7 0 15 11 4 0 8 110 19 0 6 129 0 0 348 4174 5:15 PM 28 14 9 0 12 6 5 0 6 103 24 0 4 156 2 0 369 4234 5:20 PM 32 14 5 0 10 5 1 0 3 108 25 0 10 157 2 0 372 4250 5:25 PM 33 16 5 0 13 6 1 0 8 113 26 0 9 144 0 0 374 4278 5:30 PM 22 16 9 0 9 9 2 0 7 90 24 0 7 159 1 0 355 4290 5:35 PM 38 20 1 0 13 7 4 0 4 100 16 0 4 151 1 1 360 4309 5:40 PM 28 19 3 0 14 13 4 0 5 83 25 0 6 129 0 0 329 4280 5:45 PM 30 10 5 0 10 6 1 0 10 118 26 0 0 129 1 0 346 4286 5:50 PM 22 10 5 0 13 3 4 0 6 103 14 0 2 143 1 0 326 4280 5:55 PM 27 12 7 0 12 7 1 0 5 109 19 0 3 152 1 1 356 4274 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Total All Vehicles 372 176 76 0 140 68 28 0 68 1296 300 0 92 1828 16 0 4460 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 24 0 36 Pedestrians 0 4 0 8 12 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 4 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/18/2013 5:30 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: SW Dartmouth St--SW Pacific Hwy QC JOB#: 10973710 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE: Sat, Jun 01 2013 320 180 Peak-Hour: 12:15 PM--1:15 PM i I' 1.6 0.0 67 122 131 Peak 15-Min: 1:00 PM-- 1:15 PM i t i 4 3.0 0.8 1.5 1869 55 J t • 29 1512 J i ~ 1. 2.0 0.0 t 0.0 2.2 1143* 0.96 *1377 * 3.4 2.4 1720* 522 i * r 106 1371 * 7 - r * 2A 0.6 fi * f` 0.9 3.0 425 96 97 Quality i * Counts �0.7 0.0 0.0 1-- • 750 618 T RAN SPQRTA.TION DATA 4 4 COL LECTIOFd SERVICES 0.7 0.5 ___1 10 L 1 o 1 0 r 4 4 l o J t o 0 I A 1 18 I 0 * * 2 Y • IlL 0 ' 4, * f ` 0 6 , 0 0 0 1 1 • NA 4 J i 4 I — J i 4 '� ' /\t '` 11 A J ire t * \* * 4.NA NA NA w w NA * 1 \/r * 1 r 7 * * � --lob--lob1- r• � NA NA i 5-Min Count SW Dartmouth St SW Dartmouth St SW Pacific Hwy SW Pacific Hwy Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U 12:00 PIS 33 7 5 0 6 5 6 0 3 120 50 1 7 103 5 0 363 12:05 PM 29 3 8 0 9 6 3 0 8 87 43 0 9 123 2 0 330 12:10 PM 41 12 13 0 13 11 5 0 6 81 38 0 10 89 3 0 322 12:15 PM 30 2 13 0 8 9 5 0 10 123 41 0 3 113 4 0 361 12:20 PM 37 9 7 0 9 13 1 0 3 96 48 0 6 133 4 0 366 12:25 PM 47 12 8 0 13 9 7 0 5 73 40 0 14 103 1 0 332 12:30 PM 25 11 6 0 18 16 5 0 5 95 51 0 11 88 1 0 332 12:35 PM 32 9 8 0 9 6 5 0 1 100 46 0 9 122 1 0 348 12:40 PM 42 11 9 0 4 9 9 0 1 75 37 0 13 107 5 0 322 12:45 PM 39 6 6 0 16 9 7 0 5 90 47 0 6 106 5 0 342 12:50 PM 34 4 7 0 9 11 8 0 0 109 47 0 7 126 1 0 363 12:55 PM 31 12 5 0 12 10 4 0 5 81 35 0 11 113 1 0 320 4101 1:00 PM 39 11 9 0 13 15 9 0 18 93 30 0 8 100 0 0 335 4073 1:05 PM 31 6 10 0 9 8 2 0 6 109 53 0 9 142 4 0 389 4132 1:10 PM 38 3 9 0 11 7 5 0 6 99 47 0 9 124 2 0 360 4170 1:15 PM 46 4 8 0 11 16 3 0 4 74 39 0 9 97 0 0 311 4120 1:20 PM 21 13 9 0 7 11 4 0 7 115 50 0 4 116 0 0 357 4111 1:25 PM 21 8 8 0 5 12 2 0 7 94 32 0 7 127 2 0 325 4104 1:30 PM 37 9 8 0 12 9 2 0 6 80 44 0 11 86 0 0 304 4076 1:35 PM 27 6 2 0 12 10 5 0 8 110 53 0 7 105 0 0 345 4073 1:40 PM 33 5 8 0 8 9 6 0 7 91 58 0 3 109 1 0 338 4089 1:45 PM 37 11 9 0 11 14 2 0 8 76 40 0 12 114 2 0 336 4083 1:50 PM 37 3 8 0 13 15 11 0 9 89 50 0 8 94 2 0 339 4059 1:55 PM 28 4 3 0 12 9 5 0 5 109 52 0 11 123 1 0 362 4101 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Total All Vehicles 432 80 112 0 132 120 64 0 80 1204 520 0 104 1464 24 0 4336 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 56 4 0 40 0 108 Pedestrians 0 8 0 24 32 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/18/2013 5:30 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Hwy 217 NB Ramps--SW Pacific Hwy QC JOB#: 10973711 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE: Tue,Jun 04 2013 0 571 Peak-Hour: 4:20 PM--5:20 PM a * L 0.0 1.6 0 0 o Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM--5:15 PM a J i 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1841 0 J t 5 • 71 2168 i 4 1. 2.2 0.0 t 1.6 2.1 1616* 0.95 •1597 •• • 2.7 2.3 1939* 323 i * r r 0 1761 * 7 r • 2.7 2.8 fi * r 0.0 2.6 244 0 145 Quality 1-- • * ull k Counts1.6 0.0 1.4 323 389 T RAN SPQRTA.TION DATA 4 4 COLLECTION SERVICES 2.8 1.5 _1 0 L 0 0 0 r 4 4 o J t o 0 I JA I 0 4 1 'IL1 r �► o h * P 0 1 , o o a J i 4 l • NA 4 I NA — ___L4., 1 40:: ,t. • a 4 it 1 rig J ilia NA NA NA 4.w w NA * z \/r • z r 7 ., * � --1 .1 .1- r• � NA NA i * 5-Min Count Hwy 217 NB Ramps Hwy 217 NB Ramps SW Pacific Hwy SW Pacific Hwy Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U 4:00 PM 21 0 6 0 0 0 5 0 0 110 25 0 0 107 41 0 310 4:05 PM 14 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 32 0 0 101 36 0 340 4:10 PM 20 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 29 0 0 108 50 0 361 4:15 PM 24 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 27 0 0 121 41 0 328 4:20 PM 17 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 135 29 0 0 132 42 0 371 4:25 PM 21 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 33 0 0 138 46 0 388 4:30 PM 21 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 157 31 0 0 131 53 0 410 4:35 PM 18 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 16 0 0 131 42 0 346 4:40 PM 19 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 25 0 0 131 43 0 352 4:45 PM 18 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 23 0 0 115 47 0 366 4:50 PM 28 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 131 27 0 0 120 33 0 351 4:55 PM 21 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 35 0 0 121 46 0 380 4303 5:00 PM I 20 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 29 0 0 152 51 0 401 4394 5:05 PM 18 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 26 0 0 151 57 0 391 4445 5:10 PM 21 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 131 28 0 0 151 50 0 391 4475 5:15 PM 22 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 21 0 0 124 61 0 349 4496 5:20 PM 20 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 139 17 0 0 132 54 0 367 4492 5:25 PM 27 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 21 0 0 122 42 0 346 4450 5:30 PM 14 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 34 0 0 133 61 0 377 4417 5:35 PM 17 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 133 29 0 0 153 53 0 388 4459 5:40 PM 10 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 29 0 0 137 40 0 355 4462 5:45 PM 21 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 40 0 0 147 39 0 380 4476 5:50 PM 17 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 21 0 0 132 34 0 337 4462 5:55 PM 12 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 23 0 0 139 47 0 359 4441 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Total All Vehicles 236 0 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 1588 332 0 0 1816 632 0 4732 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 8 0 28 16 100 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/18/2013 5:30 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Hwy 217 NB Ramps--SW Pacific Hwy QC JOB#: 10973712 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE: Sat, Jun 01 2013 0 563 Peak-Hour: 12:20 PM--1:20 PM a * L 0.0 1.8 0 0 o Peak 15-Min: 1:00 PM-- 1:15 PM a * J i 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1657 0 J t 5 • 60 1950 4.1 i 4 1. 2.1 0.0 t 1.8 2.1 1637* 0.97 .1390 •• • 2.1 2.2 • 1985* 348 i * r 0 1812 * 7 2.1 2.3 fi * 0.0 2.2 267 3 175 Quality 1-- • * Ula k �I 1.1 0.0 3.4 348 445 T RAN SPQRTA.TION DATA 4 4 COL LECTIOFd SERVICES 2.3 2.0 ___1 3 L o 0 0 r 4 4 o J t o orA to o 1 IlL z r 11-- o o a i_ _. l • NA 4 J i 4 I —4, J •a 4 ii. , if 1 rig J NA NA NA w w NA ilia 4.* z \/r • z r 7 ... . i * � --lob .1- r• � NA NA 5-Min Count Hwy 217 NB Ramps Hwy 217 NB Ramps SW Pacific Hwy SW Pacific Hwy Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U 12:00 PM 12 0 n 0 0 0 6 0 0 154 7 0 0 94 41 0 347 12:05 PM 24 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 131 25 0 0 109 55 0 357 12:10 PM 20 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 153 30 0 0 115 38 0 369 12:15 PM 16 1 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 35 0 0 98 57 0 363 12:20 PM 24 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 23 0 0 109 51 0 358 12:25 PM 19 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 34 0 0 130 50 0 389 12:30 PM 17 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 37 0 0 95 41 0 338 12:35 PM 27 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 119 26 0 0 106 42 0 337 12:40 PM 25 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 131 35 0 0 123 46 0 372 12:45 PM 21 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 148 32 0 0 119 50 0 387 12:50 PM 20 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 31 0 0 110 48 0 347 12:55 PM 24 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 133 25 0 0 118 35 0 346 4310 1:00 PM I 20 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 27 0 0 139 47 0 395 4358 1:05 PM 20 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 21 0 0 110 49 0 360 4361 1:10 PM 28 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 28 0 0 116 49 0 372 4364 1:15 PM 22 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 148 29 0 0 115 52 0 379 4380 1:20 PM 21 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 19 0 0 97 49 0 351 4373 1:25 PM 23 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 23 0 0 85 43 0 302 4286 1:30 PM 21 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 151 24 0 0 100 59 0 375 4323 1:35 PM 20 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 144 29 0 0 102 40 0 353 4339 1:40 PM 27 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 16 0 0 101 42 0 337 4304 1:45 PM 22 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 27 0 0 116 50 0 370 4287 1:50 PM 17 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 30 0 0 126 49 0 388 4328 1:55 PM 18 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 127 27 0 0 89 45 0 324 4306 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Total All Vehicles 272 4 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 1688 304 0 0 1460 580 0 4508 Heavy Trucks 4 0 8 0 0 0 0 44 8 0 32 8 104 Pedestrians 4 4 0 0 8 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/18/2013 5:30 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Hwy 217 SB Ramps--SW Pacific Hwy QC JOB#: 10973713 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE:Tue,Jun 04 2013 730 0 Peak-Hour: 4:15 PM --5:15 PM a I' 2.1 0.0 241 3 486 1 Peak 15-Min: 4:20 PM--4:35 PM a * i 4 3.3 0.0 1.4 20210 J t • 0 1845 J a ~ 1. 2.7 0.0 t 0.0 2.5 1458* 0.95 .1780 • • 3.2 2.6 • 1730* 272 i * r 65 1945 * 7 - 3.0 1.8 fi * 1.5 2.8 7, 0 0 1-- • * Quality �I4, 0.0 0.0 0.0 339 0 T RAN SPQR TATION DATA a 4 COLLECTION! SERVICES 1.8 0.0 _1 6 L o 0 0 r 4 4 o J t o 0 t JA t o 3 3 �' �► 0 z ti * r`r 0 2 0 0 0 a NA —3 NA — J i 4 « � t11 if � ■S NA i NA NA 4.w w NA * 1 \/r • z r --14, * � 1 .1 * r• � NA NA 5-Min Count Hwy 217 SB Ramps Hwy 217 SB Ramps SW Pacific Hwy SW Pacific Hwy Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 37 0 15 0 0 97 34 0 3 122 0 0 308 4:05 PM 0 0 0 0 67 0 23 0 0 124 18 0 5 111 0 0 348 4:10 PM 0 0 0 0 36 0 15 0 0 119 25 0 4 123 0 0 322 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 32 1 25 0 0 107 25 0 5 144 0 0 339 4:20 PM 0 0 0 0 41 0 19 0 0 128 33 0 8 140 0 0 369 4:25 PM 0 0 0 0 32 0 17 0 0 140 24 0 6 146 0 0 365 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 44 0 29 0 — 0 138 25 0 4 155 0 0 i 395 4:35 PM 0 0 0 0 58 1 26 0 0 88 30 0 3 141 0 1 348 4:40 PM 0 0 0 0 58 1 16 0 0 93 24 0 6 148 0 0 346 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 43 0 11 0 0 128 11 0 11 129 0 0 333 4:50 PM 0 0 0 0 29 0 17 0 0 137 18 0 4 153 0 0 358 4:55 PM 0 0 0 0 41 0 26 0 0 143 12 0 1 134 0 0 357 4188 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 37 0 17 0 0 123 20 0 4 163 0 0 364 4244 5:05 PM 0 0 0 0 33 0 16 0 0 113 29 0 7 168 0 0 366 4262 5:10 PM 0 0 0 0 38 0 22 0 0 120 21 0 5 159 0 0 365 4305 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 34 0 21 0 0 91 22 0 1 146 0 0 315 4281 5:20 PM 0 0 0 0 39 0 21 0 0 112 22 0 7 150 0 1 352 4264 5:25 PM 0 0 0 0 44 1 16 0 0 115 12 0 1 152 0 0 341 4240 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 34 0 19 0 0 127 24 0 3 135 0 0 342 4187 5:35 PM 0 0 0 0 37 0 21 0 0 126 15 0 2 174 0 0 375 4214 5:40 PM 0 0 0 0 49 0 12 0 0 114 21 0 1 139 0 0 336 4204 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 36 0 31 0 0 109 18 0 6 146 0 0 346 4217 5:50 PM 0 0 0 0 47 0 26 0 0 88 19 0 2 143 0 0 325 4184 5:55 PM 0 0 0 0 41 0 19 0 0 108 15 0 5 150 0 0 338 4165 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Total All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 468 0 260 0 0 1624 328 0 72 1764 0 0 4516 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 44 0 4 56 0 120 Pedestrians 4 12 0 0 16 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/18/2013 5:30 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Hwy 217 SB Ramps--SW Pacific Hwy QC JOB#: 10973714 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE: Sat, Jun 01 2013 978 0 Peak-Hour: 12:10 PM--1:10 PM 0.0 a * Peak 15-Min: 12:55 PM-- 1:10 PM 2.0 448 7 523 2.2 0.0 1.9 1 J i 4 1969 0 J t • 0 1627 J i 4 1. 1.9 0.0 t 0.0 1.8 1472* 0.97 *1521 * 2.3 1.8 • 1812* 340 i * r 106 1995 * 7 r • 2.5 3.2 fi * 0.9 2.2 7, 0 0 1-- • * Quality �I4, 0.0 0.0 0.0 453 0 IRAN SPQR TA TION DATA a 4 COL LECTIOFd SERVICES 2.6 0.0 _1 4 L o . 0 r 4 4 o J t o 8 0 •0 * 4. 2 IF J � �► o zti * r`r 0 2 0 0 0 a NA —P NA — J i 4 /\tIf if ' ids t NA * NA NA * w w 4. NA * 1 \/r • z r 7 * � 1 .11 .1 .1- r• � NA NA + 5-Min Count Hwy 217 SB Ramps Hwy 217 SB Ramps SW Pacific Hwy SW Pacific Hwy Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U 12:00 PIS 0 0 0 0 51 1 32 0 0 123 27 0 9 111 0 0 354 12:05 PM 0 0 0 0 49 0 34 0 0 112 22 0 6 111 0 0 334 12:10 PM 0 0 0 0 38 0 42 0 0 144 32 0 8 135 0 0 399 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 43 0 25 0 0 116 28 0 6 120 0 0 338 12:20 PM 0 0 0 0 55 1 48 0 0 111 24 0 10 101 0 0 350 12:25 PM 0 0 0 0 31 1 30 0 0 138 29 0 7 149 0 0 385 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 36 0 46 0 0 129 25 0 11 110 0 0 357 12:35 PM 0 0 0 0 51 1 46 0 0 107 23 0 9 109 0 0 346 12:40 PM 0 0 0 0 36 1 35 0 0 132 30 0 7 134 0 0 375 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 40 0 27 0 0 134 28 0 10 136 0 0 375 12:50 PM 0 0 0 0 68 0 40 0 0 97 19 0 12 121 0 0 357 12:55 PM 0 0 0 0 32 3 38 0 0 123 27 0 7 125 0 0 355 4325 1:00 PM 0 0 0 0 38 0 37 0 0 136 46 0 8 149 0 0 414 4385 1:05 PM 0 0 0 0 55 0 34 0 0 105 29 0 11 132 0 0 366 4417 1:10 PM 0 0 0 0 40 0 29 0 0 121 23 0 4 130 0 0 347 4365 1:15 PM 0 0 0 0 31 0 33 0 0 150 21 0 6 138 0 0 379 4406 1:20 PM 0 0 0 0 55 0 26 0 0 98 31 0 7 111 0 0 328 4384 1:25 PM 0 0 0 0 51 0 34 0 0 105 12 0 6 100 0 0 308 4307 1:30 PM 0 0 0 0 44 0 16 0 0 120 23 0 4 116 0 0 323 4273 1:35 PM 0 0 0 0 39 0 24 0 0 123 28 0 8 115 0 0 337 4264 1:40 PM 0 0 0 0 66 2 19 0 0 98 16 0 9 106 0 0 316 4205 1:45 PM 0 0 0 0 36 0 38 0 0 135 23 0 6 129 0 0 367 4197 1:50 PM 0 0 0 0 38 1 31 0 0 131 31 0 7 138 0 0 377 4217 1:55 PM 0 0 0 0 58 0 38 0 0 106 27 0 9 100 0 0 338 4200 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Left Thru Riaht U Total All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 500 12 436 0 0 1456 408 0 104 1624 0 0 4540 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 12 0 4 0 48 16 0 36 0 116 Pedestrians 8 4 4 0 16 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/18/2013 5:30 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Appendix B Level of Service Description APPENDIX B LEVEL-OF-SERVICE AND VOLUME-TO- CAPACITY CONCEPTS LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CONCEPT Level of service (LOS) is a concept developed to quantify the degree of comfort (including such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and impediments caused by other vehicles) afforded to drivers as they travel through an intersection or roadway segment. Six grades are used to denote the various level of service from "A" to "F.i1 Signalized Intersections The six level-of-service grades are described qualitatively for signalized intersections in Table Al. Additionally, Table A2 identifies the relationship between level of service and average control delay per vehicle. Control delay is defined to include initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Using this definition, Level of Service "D" is generally considered to represent the minimum acceptable design standard. Table B1 Level-of-Service Definitions (Signalized Intersections) Level of Service Average Delay per Vehicle Very low average control delay,less than 10 seconds per vehicle.This occurs when progression is extremely favorable,and A most vehicles arrive during the green phase.Most vehicles do not stop at all.Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. Average control delay is greater than 10 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 20 seconds per vehicle.This generally B occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths.More vehicles stop than for a level of service A,causing higher levels of average delay. Average control delay is greater than 20 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 35 seconds per vehicle.These higher C delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths.Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level,although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. Average control delay is greater than 35 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 55 seconds per vehicle.The influence of p congestion becomes more noticeable.Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression,long cycle length,or high volume/capacity ratios.Many vehicles stop,and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines.Individual cycle failures are noticeable. Average control delay is greater than 55 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 80 seconds per vehicle.This is usually E considered to be the limit of acceptable delay.These high delay values generally(but not always)indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths,and high volume/capacity ratios.Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. Average control delay is in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle.This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers.This F condition often occurs with oversaturation.It may also occur at high volume/capacity ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures.Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also contribute to such high delay values. 'Most of the material in this appendix is adapted from the Transportation Research Board,Highway Capacity Manual,2000. Table B2 Level-of-Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay per Vehicle(Seconds) A <10.0 B >10 and<_20 C >20 and<_35 D >35 and<_55 E >55 and<_80 F >80 Unsignalized Intersections Unsignalized intersections include two-way stop-controlled (TWSC) and all-way stop-controlled (AWSC) intersections. The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) provides models for estimating control delay at both TWSC and AWSC intersections. A qualitative description of the various service levels associated with an unsignalized intersection is presented in Table A3. A quantitative definition of level of service for unsignalized intersections is presented in Table A4. Using this definition, Level of Service "E" is generally considered to represent the minimum acceptable design standard. Table B3 Level-of-Service Definitions (Unsignalized Intersections) Level of Service Average Delay per Vehicle to Minor Street A • Nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. • Very seldom is there more than one vehicle in queue. B • Some drivers begin to consider the delay an inconvenience. • Occasionally there is more than one vehicle in queue. • Many times there is more than one vehicle in queue. • Most drivers feel restricted,but not objectionably so. D • Often there is more than one vehicle in queue. • Drivers feel quite restricted. • Represents a condition in which the demand is near or equal to the probable maximum number of vehicles that can be E accommodated by the movement. • There is almost always more than one vehicle in queue. • Drivers find the delays approaching intolerable levels. • Forced flow. F • Represents an intersection failure condition that is caused by geometric and/or operational constraints external to the intersection. Table B4 Level-of-Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay per Vehicle(Seconds) A <10.0 B >10.0 and 15.0 C >15.0 and 25.0 D >25.0 and<_35.0 E >35.0 and<_50.0 F >50.0 It should be noted that the level-of-service criteria for unsignalized intersections are somewhat different than the criteria used for signalized intersections. The primary reason for this difference is that drivers expect different levels of performance from different kinds of transportation facilities. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes than an unsignalized intersection. Additionally, there are a number of driver behavior considerations that combine to make delays at signalized intersections less galling than at unsignalized intersections. For example, drivers at signalized intersections are able to relax during the red interval, while drivers on the minor street approaches to TWSC intersections must remain attentive to the task of identifying acceptable gaps and vehicle conflicts. Also, there is often much more variability in the amount of delay experienced by individual drivers at unsignalized intersections than signalized intersections. For these reasons, it is considered that the control delay threshold for any given level of service is less for an unsignalized intersection than for a signalized intersection. While overall intersection level of service is calculated for AWSC intersections, level of service is only calculated for the minor approaches and the major street left turn movements at TWSC intersections. No delay is assumed to the major street through movements. For TWSC intersections, the overall intersection level of service remains undefined: level of service is only calculated for each minor street lane. In the performance evaluation of TWSC intersections, it is important to consider other measures of effectiveness (MOEs) in addition to delay, such as v/c ratios for individual movements, average queue lengths, and 95th—percentile queue lengths. By focusing on a single MOE for the worst movement only, such as delay for the minor-street left turn, users may make inappropriate traffic control decisions. The potential for making such inappropriate decisions is likely to be particularly pronounced when the HCM level-of-service thresholds are adopted as legal standards, as is the case in many public agencies. VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY CONCEPT The Highway Capacity Manual 2000 defines capacity as "the maximum number of vehicles that can pass a certain point during a specified period under prevailing roadway, traffic, and control conditions." Capacity analysis examines segments or points (such as signalized intersections) of a facility under uniform traffic, roadway, and control conditions. These conditions determine capacity; therefore, segments with different prevailing conditions will have different capacities. Capacity is not the absolute maximum flow rate — driver characteristics vary from region to region, and the absolute maximum capacity can vary from day to day and location to location. Signalized Intersections Capacity at signalized intersections is defined for each lane group. The lane group capacity is the maximum hourly rate at which vehicles can reasonably be expected to pass through the intersection under prevailing conditions. The ratio of flow rate to capacity (v/c), often called the volume to capacity ratio, is typically referred as to the degree of saturation. The critical v/c ratio (also known as the intersection v/c ratio) depends on the conflicting critical lane flow rates and the signal phasing, and considers only the lane groups that have the highest flow ratio (v/s) for a given signal phase. Unsignalized Intersections For unsignalized intersections, capacity is determined using a gap acceptance model which calculates the potential capacity of each minor traffic stream in accordance with Equation 17-3 in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000. The potential capacity of a movement is a function of the conflicting flow rate expressed as an hourly rate, as well as the minor-street movement. Appendix C Existing Traffic Conditions Operational Analysis Worksheets HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1 : SW Pacific Hwy & Hwy 217 SB Ramps 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 r I 14 ii 4 r Volume(vph) 0 1486 240 44 1886 0 0 0 0 463 1 245 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3505 1511 1805 3539 1681 1686 1563 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3505 1511 1805 3539 1681 1686 1563 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow(vph) 0 1548 250 46 1965 0 0 0 0 482 1 255 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 1548 208 46 1965 0 0 0 0 241 242 240 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 1 8 8 1 1 1 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 5 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 2% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% Turn Type Perm Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 4 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 92.2 92.2 7.4 104.1 26.4 26.4 26.4 Effective Green,g(s) 92.7 92.7 7.9 104.6 27.4 27.4 27.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.06 0.75 0.20 0.20 0.20 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 4.8 4.8 2.5 4.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 2321 1000 102 2644 329 330 306 v/s Ratio Prot 0.44 0.03 c0.56 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.14 0.14 c0.15 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.21 0.45 0.74 0.73 0.73 0.78 Uniform Delay,dl 14.3 9.3 64.0 10.1 52.9 52.9 53.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.09 0.61 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.5 0.5 1.8 1.5 7.5 7.5 11.7 Delay(s) 15.8 9.7 71.5 7.7 60.3 60.3 65.2 Level of Service B A E A E E E Approach Delay(s) 15.0 9.2 0.0 62.0 Approach LOS B A A E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 20.0 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Existing Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SW Pacific Hwy & Hwy 217 NB Ramps 7/31/2013 _ C 4- 4\ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 14 r +14 li r Volume(vph) 1604 345 0 2287 245 110 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 *0.89 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3505 1515 4974 1770 1615 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3505 1515 4974 1770 1615 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow(vph) 1688 363 0 2407 258 116 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 83 0 0 0 46 Lane Group Flow(vph) 1688 280 0 2407 258 70 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 6 6 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 6 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 0% 2% 2% 0% Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 2 8 Actuated Green,G(s) 108.1 108.1 108.1 22.4 22.4 Effective Green,g(s) 108.1 108.1 108.1 23.4 23.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.17 0.17 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 4.6 4.6 5.2 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 2706 1170 3841 296 270 v/s Ratio Prot 0.48 c0.48 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.24 0.63 0.87 0.26 Uniform Delay,dl 7.0 4.5 7.0 56.8 50.8 Progression Factor 1.08 3.35 0.73 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 0.9 0.4 0.4 23.0 0.3 Delay(s) 8.4 15.3 5.5 79.8 51.1 Level of Service A B A E D Approach Delay(s) 9.7 5.5 70.9 Approach LOS A A E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 12.3 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Existing Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW Pacific Hwy & SW 78th Ave 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'I 11' r I 14+ 'I"I 14 ii T. Volume(vph) 83 1280 289 68 1763 11 369 184 73 140 98 37 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 3505 1576 1805 3536 3502 1803 1805 1782 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 3505 1576 1805 3536 3502 1803 1805 1782 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow(vph) 86 1333 301 71 1836 11 384 192 76 146 102 39 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 121 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 10 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 86 1333 180 71 1847 0 384 257 0 146 131 0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 2 1 1 2 8 8 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 3 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8% Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Split Split Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green,G(s) 10.9 83.3 83.3 11.2 83.6 16.5 16.5 11.5 11.5 Effective Green,g(s) 10.9 83.8 83.8 11.2 84.1 17.0 17.0 12.0 12.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.60 0.60 0.08 0.60 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.09 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension(s) 2.3 5.2 5.2 2.3 5.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 141 2098 943 144 2124 425 219 155 153 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.38 0.04 c0.52 0.11 c0.14 c0.08 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.64 0.19 0.49 0.87 0.90 1.18 0.94 0.86 Uniform Delay,dl 62.5 18.2 12.7 61.7 23.4 60.7 61.5 63.7 63.1 Progression Factor 0.88 1.23 3.88 0.71 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 4.6 1.2 0.4 0.8 2.9 21.9 116.4 54.7 34.0 Delay(s) 59.5 23.6 49.7 44.6 12.7 82.6 177.9 118.4 97.1 Level of Service E C D D B F F F F Approach Delay(s) 30.0 13.9 121.8 108.0 Approach LOS C B F F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 41.2 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Existing Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SW Pacific Hwy & SW 72nd Ave 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations "1 14 r 'pi 14+ "I t r "I 1+ Volume(vph) 117 1276 71 91 1579 28 171 139 191 113 90 98 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.92 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 3505 1541 3467 3496 1787 1900 1533 1794 1729 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.22 1.00 1.00 0.43 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 3505 1541 3467 3496 423 1900 1533 810 1729 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow(vph) 122 1329 74 95 1645 29 178 145 199 118 94 102 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 18 0 1 0 0 0 170 0 29 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 122 1329 56 95 1673 0 178 145 29 118 167 0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 3 9 9 3 18 18 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 3 2 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 1% 1% 3% 0% 1% 0% 2% 0% 1% 0% Turn Type Prot Perm Prot pm+pt Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 8 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 13.1 85.1 85.1 8.2 80.2 29.3 17.3 17.3 28.1 16.7 Effective Green,g(s) 13.6 85.6 85.6 8.7 80.7 30.3 17.8 17.8 29.1 17.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.61 0.61 0.06 0.58 0.22 0.13 0.13 0.21 0.12 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 5.1 5.1 2.3 5.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 175 2143 942 215 2015 213 242 195 252 212 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.38 0.03 c0.48 c0.07 0.08 0.04 0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 c0.11 0.02 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.62 0.06 0.44 0.83 0.84 0.60 0.15 0.47 0.79 Uniform Delay,dl 61.2 17.0 11.0 63.3 24.1 48.3 57.7 54.4 47.2 59.6 Progression Factor 0.91 0.82 1.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 8.4 1.0 0.1 0.8 4.1 23.1 3.1 0.2 0.8 16.6 Delay(s) 64.3 14.9 12.3 64.2 28.2 71.4 60.8 54.6 48.0 76.2 Level of Service E B B E C E E D D E Approach Delay(s) 18.8 30.2 62.0 65.6 Approach LOS B C E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 32.7 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Existing Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: North Costco Dwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 f - , 4\ t 1 4/ Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r 14 14 Volume(veh/h) 0 59 0 626 271 184 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 15% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 63 0 673 291 198 Pedestrians 1 1 Lane Width(ft) 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 Right turn flare(veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) 372 614 pX,platoon unblocked 0.97 0.95 0.95 vC,conflicting volume 729 391 490 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 391 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 338 vCu, unblocked vol 561 338 441 tC,single(s) 6.8 *6.2 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 5.8 tF(s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free°A° 100 91 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 602 676 1076 Direction, Lane# EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 63 337 337 489 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 63 0 0 198 cSH 676 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.09 0.20 0.20 0.29 Queue Length 95th(ft) 8 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 10.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B Approach Delay(s) 10.9 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 * User Entered Value 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Existing Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: South Costco Dwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 4 t 1 4' Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations vir Volume(vph) 223 160 208 376 267 26 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 5.4 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 1594 1803 3574 1900 1576 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.51 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 1594 959 3574 1900 1576 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 242 174 226 409 290 28 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 99 0 0 0 20 Lane Group Flow(vph) 242 75 226 409 290 8 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 1 2 2 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% Turn Type pm+ov D.P+P Perm Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 14.0 23.1 24.2 29.2 15.1 15.1 Effective Green,g(s) 14.0 23.1 24.2 29.2 15.1 15.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.43 0.45 0.54 0.28 0.28 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 5.4 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 471 836 576 1947 535 444 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.02 c0.07 0.11 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.11 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.09 0.39 0.21 0.54 0.02 Uniform Delay,dl 16.9 9.0 9.3 6.3 16.3 13.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.1 1.1 0.0 Delay(s) 17.8 9.0 9.4 6.3 17.4 13.9 Level of Service B A A A B B Approach Delay(s) 14.2 7.4 17.1 Approach LOS B A B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.7 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 53.6 Sum of lost time(s) 15.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Existing Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 6 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: SW Dartmouth St & SW 72nd Ave 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) t r ) 1+ ii 1+ ii t r Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume(vph) 31 163 123 159 267 85 236 286 42 90 138 28 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate(vph) 34 181 137 177 297 94 262 318 47 100 153 31 Direction, Lane# EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total(vph) 34 181 137 177 391 262 364 100 153 31 Volume Left(vph) 34 0 0 177 0 262 0 100 0 0 Volume Right(vph) 0 0 137 0 94 0 47 0 0 31 Hadj(s) 0.50 0.00 -0.70 0.52 -0.17 0.50 -0.06 0.52 0.00 -0.70 Departure Headway(s) 8.7 8.2 3.2 8.1 7.4 8.0 7.4 8.6 8.1 3.2 Degree Utilization,x 0.08 0.41 0.12 0.40 0.80 0.58 0.75 0.24 0.35 0.03 Capacity(veh/h) 392 420 1121 435 476 435 473 398 424 1121 Control Delay(s) 11.3 15.6 5.4 15.1 33.0 20.3 28.4 13.1 14.1 5.1 Approach Delay(s) 11.3 27.4 25.0 12.8 Approach LOS B D C B Intersection Summary Delay 21.2 HCM Level of Service C Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Existing Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1 : SW Pacific Hwy & Hwy 217 SB Ramps 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 r ) 14 ii 4 r Volume(vph) 0 1492 339 105 1571 0 0 0 0 538 7 446 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3539 1528 1770 3539 1681 1688 1551 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3539 1528 1770 3539 1681 1688 1551 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow(vph) 0 1554 353 109 1636 0 0 0 0 560 7 465 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 1554 271 109 1636 0 0 0 0 286 281 443 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 4 2 2 4 8 8 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 2% 3% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% Turn Type Perm Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 4 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 68.0 68.0 10.1 82.6 37.9 37.9 37.9 Effective Green,g(s) 68.5 68.5 10.6 83.1 38.9 38.9 38.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.53 0.08 0.64 0.30 0.30 0.30 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 4.8 4.8 2.5 4.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 1865 805 144 2262 503 505 464 v/s Ratio Prot c0.44 0.06 c0.46 v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.17 0.17 c0.29 v/c Ratio 0.83 0.34 0.76 0.72 0.57 0.56 0.95 Uniform Delay,dl 25.9 17.7 58.4 15.7 38.5 38.3 44.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.22 0.52 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 4.5 1.1 17.1 1.8 1.1 0.9 30.0 Delay(s) 30.5 18.8 88.4 10.0 39.5 39.2 74.7 Level of Service C B F A D D E Approach Delay(s) 28.3 14.9 0.0 55.3 Approach LOS C B A E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 29.3 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 130.0 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 126.6% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Existing Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SW Pacific Hwy & Hwy 217 NB Ramps 7/31/2013 _ C 4- 4\ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 14 r +14 li r Volume(vph) 1668 363 0 1988 268 186 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 *0.96 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3539 1534 5365 1770 1568 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3539 1534 5365 1770 1568 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow(vph) 1720 374 0 2049 276 192 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 96 0 0 0 34 Lane Group Flow(vph) 1720 278 0 2049 276 158 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 1 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 3% 0% 2% 2% 3% Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 2 8 Actuated Green,G(s) 96.7 96.7 96.7 23.8 23.8 Effective Green,g(s) 96.7 96.7 96.7 24.8 24.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.19 0.19 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 4.6 4.6 5.2 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 2632 1141 3991 338 299 v/s Ratio Prot c0.49 0.38 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.24 0.51 0.82 0.53 Uniform Delay,dl 8.3 5.2 6.9 50.4 47.3 Progression Factor 0.80 2.07 0.94 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 0.9 0.3 0.3 13.6 1.1 Delay(s) 7.5 11.1 6.8 64.1 48.4 Level of Service A B A E D Approach Delay(s) 8.1 6.8 57.6 Approach LOS A A E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 12.6 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 130.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Existing Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW Pacific Hwy & SW 78th Ave 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'I 11' r I 14+ 'I"I 14 ii T. Volume(vph) 56 1172 535 109 1412 30 436 98 99 134 125 69 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 3505 1549 1787 3526 3467 1717 1770 1759 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 3505 1549 1787 3526 3467 1717 1770 1759 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow(vph) 58 1221 557 114 1471 31 454 102 103 140 130 72 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 268 0 1 0 0 29 0 0 15 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 58 1221 289 114 1501 0 454 176 0 140 187 0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 10 6 6 10 18 18 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 2 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 1% 3% Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Split Split Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green,G(s) 7.3 66.9 66.9 10.9 70.5 20.0 20.0 14.7 14.7 Effective Green,g(s) 7.3 67.4 67.4 10.9 71.0 20.5 20.5 15.2 15.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.52 0.52 0.08 0.55 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension(s) 2.3 5.2 5.2 2.3 5.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 101 1817 803 150 1926 547 271 207 206 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.35 0.06 c0.43 c0.13 0.10 0.08 c0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.67 0.36 0.76 0.78 0.83 0.65 0.68 0.91 Uniform Delay,dl 59.8 23.1 18.5 58.3 23.3 53.1 51.4 55.0 56.7 Progression Factor 0.81 1.15 4.19 0.69 0.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 4.4 1.5 1.0 13.8 2.3 9.8 4.6 7.3 37.6 Delay(s) 52.9 28.2 78.6 54.2 8.6 62.9 56.0 62.3 94.3 Level of Service D C E D A E E E F Approach Delay(s) 44.2 11.8 60.7 81.2 Approach LOS D B E F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 37.7 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 130.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Existing Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SW Pacific Hwy & SW 72nd Ave 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations "1 14 r 'pi 14+ "I t r "I 1+ Volume(vph) 131 1076 80 126 1320 39 86 101 191 114 83 112 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 3505 1562 3502 3520 1787 1900 1523 1767 1708 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00 0.53 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 3505 1562 3502 3520 512 1900 1523 994 1708 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow(vph) 135 1109 82 130 1361 40 89 104 197 118 86 115 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 24 0 1 0 0 0 172 0 39 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 135 1109 58 130 1400 0 89 104 25 118 162 0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 4 2 2 4 26 26 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 3% 1% 0% 2% 3% 1% 0% 2% 1% 0% 3% Turn Type Prot Perm Prot pm+pt Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 8 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 16.5 76.1 76.1 8.7 68.3 26.3 15.8 15.8 28.1 16.7 Effective Green,g(s) 17.0 76.6 76.6 9.2 68.8 27.3 16.3 16.3 29.1 17.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.59 0.59 0.07 0.53 0.21 0.13 0.13 0.22 0.13 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 5.1 5.1 2.3 5.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 231 2065 920 248 1863 215 238 191 293 226 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.32 0.04 c0.40 0.03 0.05 c0.04 c0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.54 0.06 0.52 0.75 0.41 0.44 0.13 0.40 0.72 Uniform Delay,dl 53.2 16.0 11.4 58.3 23.9 43.1 52.6 50.5 42.0 54.1 Progression Factor 0.69 0.63 0.72 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 2.8 0.7 0.1 1.3 2.8 0.8 0.7 0.2 0.5 9.3 Delay(s) 39.5 10.8 8.3 59.6 26.8 43.8 53.4 50.7 42.6 63.3 Level of Service D B A E C D D D D E Approach Delay(s) 13.6 29.5 49.8 55.6 Approach LOS B C D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 28.2 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 130.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Existing Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: North Costco Dwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 4 t 1 4' Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 1+ Volume(veh/h) 0 148 0 633 360 409 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 15% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 151 0 646 367 417 Pedestrians 2 3 Lane Width(ft) 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 Right turn flare(veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) 372 614 pX,platoon unblocked 0.95 0.95 0.95 vC,conflicting volume 904 578 787 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 578 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 326 vCu, unblocked vol 832 526 747 tC,single(s) 6.8 *6.2 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 5.8 tF(s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free% 100 71 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 479 524 823 Direction, Lane# EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 151 323 323 785 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 151 0 0 417 cSH 524 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.29 0.19 0.19 0.46 Queue Length 95th(ft) 30 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 14.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B Approach Delay(s) 14.6 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 * User Entered Value 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Existing Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: South Costco Dwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 4 t 1 4' Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations vir Volume(vph) 297 220 209 251 380 38 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 5.4 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 1615 1805 3574 1881 1578 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 1615 664 3574 1881 1578 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow(vph) 316 234 222 267 404 40 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 126 0 0 0 27 Lane Group Flow(vph) 316 108 222 267 404 13 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 1 1 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% Turn Type pm+ov D.P+P Perm Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 18.0 27.8 31.1 36.1 21.3 21.3 Effective Green,g(s) 18.0 27.8 31.1 36.1 21.3 21.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.43 0.48 0.56 0.33 0.33 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 5.4 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 504 821 494 2000 621 521 v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.02 c0.07 0.07 c0.21 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.15 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.13 0.45 0.13 0.65 0.03 Uniform Delay,dl 20.3 11.1 10.4 6.8 18.4 14.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 2.4 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.4 0.0 Delay(s) 22.8 11.1 10.6 6.8 20.9 14.6 Level of Service C B B A C B Approach Delay(s) 17.8 8.5 20.3 Approach LOS B A C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 15.5 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 64.5 Sum of lost time(s) 15.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Existing Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 6 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: SW Dartmouth St & SW 72nd Ave 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) t r ) 1+ ii 1+ ii t r Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume(vph) 46 177 162 46 145 48 184 203 27 91 185 38 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Hourly flow rate(vph) 47 182 167 47 149 49 190 209 28 94 191 39 Direction, Lane# EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total(vph) 47 182 167 47 199 190 237 94 191 39 Volume Left(vph) 47 0 0 47 0 190 0 94 0 0 Volume Right(vph) 0 0 167 0 49 0 28 0 0 39 Hadj(s) 0.50 0.02 -0.70 0.50 -0.15 0.50 -0.06 0.50 0.03 -0.70 Departure Headway(s) 7.4 6.9 3.2 7.4 6.7 7.0 6.4 7.2 6.7 3.2 Degree Utilization,x 0.10 0.35 0.15 0.10 0.37 0.37 0.42 0.19 0.35 0.03 Capacity(veh/h) 456 490 1121 458 504 497 540 475 511 1121 Control Delay(s) 10.0 12.4 5.6 10.0 12.5 12.7 12.8 10.6 12.1 5.1 Approach Delay(s) 9.2 12.0 12.8 10.8 Approach LOS A B B B Intersection Summary Delay 11.2 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Existing Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 7 Appendix D Crash Data CDS150 07/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION-CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE OR 99W(Hwy 091)@ OR 217(Hwy 144)Northbound ramps January 1,2007 through December 31,2011 NON- PROPERTY INTER- FATAL FATAL DAMAGE TOTAL PEOPLE PEOPLE DRY WET INTER- SECTION OFF- COLLISION TYPE CRASHES CRASHES ONLY CRASHES KILLED INJURED TRUCKS SURF SURF DAY DARK SECTION RELATED ROAD YEAR: 2011 REAR-END 0 4 5 9 0 7 0 6 3 8 1 9 0 0 SIDESWIPE-OVERTAKING 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2011 TOTAL 0 4 7 11 0 7 0 8 3 10 1 11 0 0 YEAR: 2010 REAR-END 0 2 5 7 0 3 0 4 2 6 1 7 0 0 2010 TOTAL 0 2 5 7 0 3 0 4 2 6 1 7 0 0 YEAR: 2009 REAR-END 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 4 1 5 0 5 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 2009 TOTAL 0 1 6 7 0 2 0 6 1 6 1 7 0 0 YEAR: 2008 REAR-END 0 4 1 5 0 5 0 2 3 3 2 5 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2008 TOTAL 0 4 2 6 0 5 0 3 3 4 2 6 0 0 YEAR: 2007 REAR-END 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 3 1 3 1 4 0 0 2007 TOTAL 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 3 1 3 1 4 0 0 FINAL TOTAL 0 11 24 35 0 17 0 24 10 29 6 35 0 0 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes are reported for the 2011 data file compared to previous years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Northbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 05851 Y N N 10/01/2007 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 01 NO RPT Mon TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE NE SW 001 00 12P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EF PAC HY 1W EBD 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 M OR-Y 047,026 000 01 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 23 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 022 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 M OTH-Y 000 000 00 N-RES 01884 N N N 04/09/2008 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NO RPT Wed TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 5A PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAWN INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 30 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG NO<5 03 F 000 000 00 03 PSNG NO<5 01 F 000 000 00 02041 NNNNN 04/15/2008 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLD S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 6P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 48 F OR-Y 043,026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 61 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR>25 02049 N N N 04/15/2008 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NO RPT Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 6P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 46 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 PSNG NO<5 03 F 000 000 00 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 47 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 05402 Y N N 10/03/2008 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 01 NO RPT Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 6P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EF PAC HY 1W WBD 06 0 N DUSK INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 F OR-Y 047,026 000 01 OR<25 02 PSNG NO<5 01 M 000 000 00 CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 2 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Northbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 23 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 01888 N N N 04/23/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 UNKN 9 STRGHT 07 NO RPT Thu TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 3P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 50 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 05536 N N N 05/05/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 UNKN 9 STRGHT 10 NONE Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR UNKN NE SW 000 00 1P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 014,026 000 10 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 60 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 04343 N N N 08/19/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 UNKN 9 STRGHT 07 NONE Thu TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 2P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK 026 000 07 UNK 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 31 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 00473 NNNNN 01/26/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY Wed TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 4P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 52 M OR-Y 026 000 07 OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 51 F OTH-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 00678 NNNNN 02/07/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLD S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07,27 CITY Mon TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 2P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 50 M OTH-Y 043,016,026 038 07,27 N-RES 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 48 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 3 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Northbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 01952 Y N N 04/15/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 UNKN 9 STRGHT 01 NONE Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR UNKN NE SW 000 00 6P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 U UNK 047,026 000 01 UNK 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 79 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03662 N N N 07/14/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 UNKN 0 STRGHT 013 07 NONE Thu TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR UNKN NE SW 000 00 7P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY PDO UNKNOWN 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 026 000 07 UNK 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 50 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 022 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 38 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 05042 N N N 09/19/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE Mon TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 3P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 83300 N N N 12/08/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 07 NONE Thu TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 001 00 5P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 36 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 74 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 00 F 000 000 00 03 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 022 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 31 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 4 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Northbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# EIGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 05265 N N N 10/17/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE Sat TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 5P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 40 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 01775 N NNN N 04/13/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 093 07 CITY Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 8A PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 65 M OR-Y 043,026 000 093 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 67 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 05728 NNNNN 10/15/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLD S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY Sat TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 6P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 16 F OR-Y 043,026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 35 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 05766 N NNN N 10/17/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLD S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07,27 CITY Mon TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 7A PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 21 M OR-Y 043,016,026 038 07,27 OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 35 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 04696 NNNNN 09/22/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-OTHER 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 013 07 CITY Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE SE SW 000 00 9P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 01 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 38 F OR-Y 043,026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE SE SW 013 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 50 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 56 M 000 000 00 CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 5 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Northbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 03 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE SE SW 013 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR>25 04 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE SE SW 013 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 28 F OTH-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 05 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE SE SW 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 50 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 04304 N N N 07/28/2007 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NO RPT Sat TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 2P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 02 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 38 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 32 M OTH-Y 000 000 00 N-RES 03322 N N N 06/24/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-OTHER 01 NONE 0 TURN-R 07 NONE Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN UNKN SE NE 000 00 11A PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 02 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 042 000 07 UNK 02 NONE 0 TURN-R PRVTE SE NE 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 37 F OTH-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 05114 N N N 09/23/2008 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 UNKN 9 STRGHT 04 NONE Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN ONE-WAY N DRY TURN UNKN NE SW 000 00 1P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 03 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 35 M OTH-Y 020 000 04 N-RES 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE SE SW 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 01651 N N N 03/26/2008 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NO RPT Wed TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 4P PORTLAND UA 8.56 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 27 M OR-Y 026 000 07 OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 27 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR>25 CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 6 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Northbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 00335 N N N 01/20/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 UNKN 9 STRGHT 07 NO RPT Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 4P PORTLAND UA 8.59 NB EF PAC HY 1W EBD 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 21 F OTH-Y 026 000 07 N-RES 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 35 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR>25 00065 N NNN N 01/07/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 07,27 CITY Thu TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 12P PORTLAND UA 8.59 NB EF PAC HY 1W EBD 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 M OTH-Y 043,026,016 038 07,27 N-RES 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 022 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 28 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR>25 01381 N N N 03/21/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013,004 07 NONE Sun TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W N R-GRN-SIG N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 1P PORTLAND UA 8.62 NB EF PAC HY 1W WBD 09 1 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 28 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 32 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG NO<5 02 F 000 000 00 03 NONE 0 TURN-R PRVTE NE NW 013 004 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 25 F 000 000 00 02844 N N N 05/01/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 UNK PORTLAND UA 8.62 NB EF PAC HY 1W WBD 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 29 M OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 UNKN 9 STOP UNKN NE SW 011 00 UNKNOWN 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 000 000 00 UNK CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 7 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Northbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 05425 N N N 10/27/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-OTHER 01 NONE 0 TURN-R 08 NONE Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN UNKNOWN N DRY TURN PRVTE NE NW 000 00 12P PORTLAND UA 8.62 NB EF PAC HY 1W WBD 01 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 48 M OR-Y 006 000 08 OR>25 02 NONE 0 TURN-R PRVTE NE NW 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 19 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02370 N NNN N 05/07/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY Sat TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY SS-0 PRVTE NE SW 000 00 8A PORTLAND UA 8.62 NB EF PAC HY 1W WBD 01 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 M OR-Y 042 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE NE SW 006 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 57 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 06935 N N N 12/10/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 07 NONE Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 9A PORTLAND UA 8.62 NB EF PAC HY 1W WBD 02 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 50 M OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 54 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03 UNKN 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 UNKNOWN 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK 000 000 00 UNK CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 8 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 144 BEAVERTON-TIGARD OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Northbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 06307 N N N 11/13/2010 WASHINGTON 1 19 2 INTER 3-LEG N N UNK S-1STOP 01 UNKN 9 STRGHT 07 NONE Sat TIGARD 6 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SE TRF SIGNAL N UNK REAR UNKN SE NW 000 00 5P PORTLAND UA 6.48 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 05 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE NW 012 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 46 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02185 NNNYY 04/19/2007 WASHINGTON 1 19 2 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE STRGHT 07 Thu TIGARD 6 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SE NW 000 00 3P PORTLAND UA 6.48 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 45 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE STOP PRVTE SE NW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 05119 N N N 09/01/2007 WASHINGTON 1 12 2 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 07 NO RPT Sat TIGARD 6 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SE NW 000 00 8P PORTLAND UA 6.48 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 M OR-Y 026 000 07 OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE NW 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 35 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE NW 022 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 44 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 01863 N N N 04/18/2010 WASHINGTON 1 19 2 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 10 NONE Sun TIGARD 6 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SE NW 000 00 2P PORTLAND UA 6.48 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 49 M OR-Y 014,026 000 10 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE NW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 48 M OTH-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02481 N N N 05/14/2011 WASHINGTON 1 19 2 INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 10 NO RPT Sat TIGARD 6 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SE TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE SE NW 000 00 5P PORTLAND UA 6.48 NB EX PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 25 F OR-Y 014,026 000 10 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE NW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 36 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR>25 CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 9 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 144 BEAVERTON-TIGARD OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Northbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 02 PSNG INJC 29 F 000 000 00 ACTION CODE TRANSLATION LIST ACTION SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 000 NONE NO ACTION OR NON-WARRANTED 001 SKIDDED SKIDDED 002 ON/OFF V GETTING ON OR OFF STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE 003 LOAD OVR OVERHANGING LOAD STRUCK ANOTHER VEHICLE, ETC. 006 SLOW DN SLOWED DOWN 007 AVOIDING AVOIDING MANEUVER 008 PAR PARK PARALLEL PARKING 009 ANG PARK ANGLE PARKING 010 INTERFERE PASSENGER INTERFERING WITH DRIVER 011 STOPPED STOPPED IN TRAFFIC NOT WAITING TO MAKE A LEFT TURN 012 STP/L TRN STOPPED BECAUSE OF LEFT TURN SIGNAL OR WAITING, ETC. 013 STP TURN STOPPED WHILE EXECUTING A TURN 015 GO A/STOP PROCEED AFTER STOPPING FOR A STOP SIGN/FLASHING RED. 016 TRN A/RED TURNED ON RED AFTER STOPPING 017 LOSTCTRL LOST CONTROL OF VEHICLE 018 EXIT DWY ENTERING STREET OR HIGHWAY FROM ALLEY OR DRIVEWAY 019 ENTR DWY ENTERING ALLEY OR DRIVEWAY FROM STREET OR HIGHWAY 020 STR ENTR BEFORE ENTERING ROADWAY, STRUCK PEDESTRIAN, ETC. ON SIDEWALK OR SHOULDER 021 NO DRVR CAR RAN AWAY - NO DRIVER 022 PREV COL STRUCK, OR WAS STRUCK BY, VEHICLE OR PEDESTRIAN IN PRIOR COLLISION BEFORE ACC. STABILIZED 023 STALLED VEHICLE STALLED 024 DRVR DEAD DEAD BY UNASSOCIATED CAUSE 025 FATIGUE FATIGUED, SLEEPY, ASLEEP 026 SUN DRIVER BLINDED BY SUN 027 HDLGHTS DRIVER BLINDED BY HEADLIGHTS 028 ILLNESS PHYSICALLY ILL 029 THRU MED VEHICLE CROSSED, PLUNGED OVER, OR THROUGH MEDIAN BARRIER 030 PURSUIT PURSUING OR ATTEMPTING TO STOP ANOTHER VEHICLE 031 PASSING PASSING SITUATION 032 PRKOFFRD VEHICLE PARKED BEYOND CURB OR SHOULDER 033 CROS MED VEHICLE CROSSED EARTH OR GRASS MEDIAN 034 X N/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - NO TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 035 X W/ SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 036 DIAGONAL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - DIAGONALLY 037 BTWN INT CROSSING BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS 038 DISTRACT DRIVER'S ATTENTION DISTRACTED 039 W/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER WITH TRAFFIC 040 A/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER FACING TRAFFIC 041 W/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT WITH TRAFFIC 042 A/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT FACING TRAFFIC 043 PLAYINRD PLAYING IN STREET OR ROAD 044 PUSH MV PUSHING OR WORKING ON VEHICLE IN ROAD OR ON SHOULDER 045 WORK ON WORKING IN ROADWAY OR ALONG SHOULDER 050 LAY ON RD STANDING OR LYING IN ROADWAY 051 ENT OFFRD ENTERING / STARTING IN TRAFFIC LANE FROM OFF-ROAD 088 OTHER OTHER ACTION 099 UNK UNKNOWN ACTION CAUSE CODE TRANSLATION LIST COLLISION TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST CAUSE SHORT COLL SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 00 NO CODE NO CAUSE ASSOCIATED AT THIS LEVEL & 0TH MISCELLANEOUS 01 TOO-FAST TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS (NOT EXCEED POSTED SPEED - BACK BACKING 02 NO-YIELD DID NOT YIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 PED PEDESTRIAN 03 PAS-STOP PASSED STOP SIGN OR RED FLASHER 1 ANGL ANGLE 04 DIS--RAG DISREGARDED R-A-G TRAFFIC SIGNAL. 2 HEAD HEAD-ON 05 LEFT-CTR DROVE LEFT OF CENTER ON TWO-WAY ROAD 3 REAR REAR-END 06 IMP-OVER IMPROPER OVERTAKING 4 SS-M SIDESWIPE - MEETING 07 TOO-CLOS FOLLOWED TOO CLOSELY 5 SS-0 SIDESWIPE - OVERTAKING 08 IMP-TURN MADE IMPROPER TURN 6 TURN TURNING MOVEMENT 09 DRINKING ALCOHOL OR DRUG INVOLVED 7 PARK PARKING MANEUVER 10 OTHR-IMP OTHER IMPROPER DRIVING 8 NCOL NON-COLLISION 11 MECH-DEF MECHANICAL DEFECT 9 FIX FIXED OBJECT OR OTHER OBJECT 12 OTHER OTHER (NOT IMPROPER DRIVING) 13 IMP LN C IMPROPER CHANGE OF TRAFFIC LANES 14 DIS TCD DISREGARDED OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE 15 WRNG WAY WRONG WAY ON ONE-WAY ROADWAY 16 FATIGUE DRIVER DROWSY/FATIGUED/SLEEPY 18 IN RDWY NON-MOTORIST ILLEGALLY IN ROADWAY 19 NT VISBL NON-MOTORIST CLOTHING NOT VISIBLE 20 IMP PKNG VEHICLE IMPROPERLY PARKED 21 DEF STER DEFECTIVE STEERING MECHANISM CRASH TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST 22 DEF BRKE INADEQUATE OR NO BRAKES 24 LOADSHFT VEHICLE LOST LOAD OR LOAD SHIFTED CRASH SHORT 25 TIREFAIL TIRE FAILURE TYPE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 26 PHANTOM PHANTOM / NON-CONTACT VEHICLE & OVERTURN OVERTURNED 27 INATTENT INATTENTION 0 NON-COLL OTHER NON-COLLISION 30 SPEED DRIVING IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED 1 0TH RDWY MOTOR VEHICLE ON OTHER ROADWAY 31 RACING SPEED RACING (PER PAR) 2 PRKD MV PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE 32 CARELESS CARELESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 3 PED PEDESTRIAN 33 RECKLESS RECKLESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 4 TRAIN RAILWAY TRAIN 34 AGGRESV AGGRESSIVE DRIVING (PER PAR) 6 BIKE PEDALCYCLIST 35 RD RAGE ROAD RAGE (PER PAR) 7 ANIMAL ANIMAL 8 FIX OBJ FIXED OBJECT 9 OTH OBJ OTHER OBJECT A ANGL-STP ENTERING AT ANGLE - ONE VEHICLE STOPPED B ANGL-OTH ENTERING AT ANGLE - ALL OTHERS C S-STRGHT FROM SAME DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT D S-1TURN FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT E S-1STOP FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED F S-OTHER FROM SAME DIRECTION-ALL OTHERS, INCLUDING PARKING G O-STRGHT FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT H 0-1TURN FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT I 0-1STOP FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED J 0-OTHER FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION-ALL OTHERS INCL. PARKING DRIVER LICENSE CODE TRANSLATION LIST DRIVER RESIDENCE CODE TRANSLATION LIST LIC SHORT RES SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 0 NONE NOT LICENSED (HAD NEVER BEEN LICENSED) 1 OR<25 OREGON RESIDENT WITHIN 25 MILE OF HOME 1 OR-Y VALID OREGON LICENSE 2 OR>25 OREGON RESIDENT 25 OR MORE MILES FROM HOME 2 OTH-Y VALID LICENSE, OTHER STATE OR COUNTRY 3 OR-? OREGON RESIDENT - UNKNOWN DISTANCE FROM HOME 4 N-RES NON-RESIDENT 3 SUSP SUSPENDED/REVOKED 9 UNK UNKNOWN IF OREGON RESIDENT ERROR CODE TRANSLATION LIST ERROR SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION 000 NONE NO ERROR 001 WIDE TRN WIDE TURN 002 CUT CORN CUT CORNER ON TURN 003 FAIL TRN FAILED TO OBEY MANDATORY TRAFFIC TURN SIGNAL, SIGN OR LANE MARKINGS 004 L IN TRF LEFT TURN IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC 005 L PROHIB LEFT TURN WHERE PROHIBITED 006 FRM WRNG TURNED FROM WRONG LANE 007 TO WRONG TURNED INTO WRONG LANE 008 ILLEG U U-TURNED ILLEGALLY 009 IMP STOP IMPROPERLY STOPPED IN TRAFFIC LANE 010 IMP SIG IMPROPER SIGNAL OR FAILURE TO SIGNAL 011 IMP BACK BACKING IMPROPERLY (NOT PARKING) 012 IMP PARK IMPROPERLY PARKED 013 UNPARK IMPROPER START LEAVING PARKED POSITION 014 IMP STRT IMPROPER START FROM STOPPED POSITION 015 IMP LGHT IMPROPER OR NO LIGHTS (VEHICLE IN TRAFFIC) 016 INATTENT FAILED TO DIM LIGHTS (UNTIL 4/1/97) / INATTENTION (AFTER 4/1/97) 017 UNSF VEH DRIVING UNSAFE VEHICLE (NO OTHER ERROR APPARENT) 018 OTH PARK ENTERING/EXITING PARKED POSITION W/ INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE; OTHER IMPROPER PARKING MANEUVER 019 DIS DRIV DISREGARDED OTHER DRIVER'S SIGNAL 020 DIS SGNL DISREGARDED TRAFFIC SIGNAL 021 RAN STOP DISREGARDED STOP SIGN OR FLASHING RED 022 DIS SIGN DISREGARDED WARNING SIGN, FLARES OR FLASHING AMBER 023 DIS OFCR DISREGARDED POLICE OFFICER OR FLAGMAN 024 DIS EMER DISREGARDED SIREN OR WARNING OF EMERGENCY VEHICLE 025 DIS RR DISREGARDED RR SIGNAL, RR SIGN, OR RR FLAGMAN 026 REAR-END FAILED TO AVOID STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE AHEAD OTHER THAN SCHOOL BUS 027 BIKE ROW DID NOT HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY OVER PEDALCYCLIST 028 NO ROW DID NOT HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY 029 PED ROW FAILED TO YIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO PEDESTRIAN 030 PAS CURV PASSING ON A CURVE 031 PAS WRNG PASSING ON THE WRONG SIDE 032 PAS TANG PASSING ON STRAIGHT ROAD UNDER UNSAFE CONDITIONS 033 PAS X-WK PASSED VEHICLE STOPPED AT CROSSWALK FOR PEDESTRIAN 034 PAS INTR PASSING AT INTERSECTION 035 PAS HILL PASSING ON CREST OF HILL 036 N/PAS ZN PASSING IN "NO PASSING" ZONE 037 PAS TRAF PASSING IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC 038 CUT-IN CUTTING IN (TWO LANES - TWO WAY ONLY) 039 WRNGSIDE DRIVING ON WRONG SIDE OF THE ROAD 040 THRU MED DRIVING THROUGH SAFETY ZONE OR OVER ISLAND 041 F/ST BUS FAILED TO STOP FOR SCHOOL BUS ERROR CODE TRANSLATION LIST ERROR SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION 042 F/SLO MV FAILED TO DECREASE SPEED FOR SLOWER MOVING VEHICLE 043 TO CLOSE FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY (MUST BE ON OFFICER'S REPORT) 044 STRDL LN STRADDLING OR DRIVING ON WRONG LANES 045 IMP CHG IMPROPER CHANGE OF TRAFFIC LANES 046 WRNG WAY WRONG WAY ON ONE-WAY ROADWAY (DELIBERATELY TRAVELING ON WRONG SIDE) 047 BASCRULE DRIVING TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS (NOT EXCEEDING POSTED SPEED) 048 OPN DOOR OPENED DOOR INTO ADJACENT TRAFFIC LANE 049 IMPEDING IMPEDING TRAFFIC 050 SPEED DRIVING IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED 051 RECKLESS RECKLESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 052 CARELESS CARELESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 053 RACING SPEED RACING (PER PAR) 054 X N/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION, NO TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 055 X W/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION, TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 056 DIAGONAL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - DIAGONALLY 057 BTWN INT CROSSING BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS 059 W/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER WITH TRAFFIC 060 A/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER FACING TRAFFIC 061 W/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT WITH TRAFFIC 062 A/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT FACING TRAFFIC 063 PLAYINRD PLAYING IN STREET OR ROAD 064 PUSH MV PUSHING OR WORKING ON VEHICLE IN ROAD OR ON SHOULDER 065 WK IN RD WORKING IN ROADWAY OR ALONG SHOULDER 070 LAYON RD STANDING OR LYING IN ROADWAY 073 ELUDING ELUDING 080 FAIL LN FAILED TO MAINTAIN LANE 081 OFF RD RAN OFF ROAD 082 NO CLEAR DRIVER MISJUDGED CLEARANCE 083 OVRSTEER OVERCORRECTING 084 NOT USED CODE NOT IN USE 085 OVRLOAD OVERLOADING OR IMPROPER LOADING OF VEHICLE WITH CARGO OR PASSENGERS 097 UNA DIS TC UNABLE TO DETERMINE WHICH DRIVER DISREGARDED TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE EVENT CODE TRANSLATION LIST EVENT SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 001 FEL/JUMP OCCUPANT FELL, JUMPED OR WAS EJECTED FROM MOVING VEHICLE 002 INTERFER PASSENGER INTERFERED WITH DRIVER 003 BUG INTF ANIMAL OR INSECT IN VEHICLE INTERFERED WITH DRIVER 004 PED INV PEDESTRIAN INVOLVED (NON-PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENT) 005 SUB-PED "SUB-PED": PEDESTRIAN INJURED SUBSEQUENT TO COLLISION, ETC. 006 BIKE INV TRICYCLE-BICYCLE INVOLVED 007 HITCHIKR HITCHHIKER (SOLICITING A RIDE) 008 PSNGR TOW PASSENGER BEING TOWED OR PUSHED ON CONVEYANCE 009 ON/OFF V GETTING ON OR OFF STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE (OCCUPANTS ONLY) 010 SUB OTRN OVERTURNED AFTER FIRST HARMFUL EVENT 011 MV PUSHD VEHICLE BEING PUSHED 012 MV TOWED VEHICLE TOWED OR HAD BEEN TOWING ANOTHER VEHICLE 013 FORCED VEHICLE FORCED BY IMPACT INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE, PEDALCYCLIST OR PEDESTRIAN 014 SET MOTN VEHICLE SET IN MOTION BY NON-DRIVER (CHILD RELEASED BRAKES, ETC.) 015 RR ROW AT OR ON RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY (NOT LIGHT RAIL) 016 LT RL ROW AT OR ON LIGHT-RAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY 017 RR HIT V TRAIN STRUCK VEHICLE 018 V HIT RR VEHICLE STRUCK TRAIN 019 HIT RR CAR VEHICLE STRUCK RAILROAD CAR ON ROADWAY 020 JACKNIFE JACKKNIFE; TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE STRUCK TOWING VEHICLE 021 TRL OTRN TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE OVERTURNED 022 CN BROKE TRAILER CONNECTION BROKE 023 DETACH TRL DETACHED TRAILING OBJECT STRUCK OTHER VEHICLE, NON-MOTORIST, OR OBJECT 024 V DOOR OPN VEHICLE DOOR OPENED INTO ADJACENT TRAFFIC LANE 025 WHEELOFF WHEEL CAME OFF 026 HOOD UP HOOD FLEW UP 028 LOAD SHIFT LOST LOAD, LOAD MOVED OR SHIFTED 029 TIREFAIL TIRE FAILURE 030 PET PET: CAT, DOG AND SIMILAR 031 LVSTOCK STOCK: COW, CALF, BULL, STEER, SHEEP, ETC. 032 HORSE HORSE, MULE, OR DONKEY 033 HRSE&RID HORSE AND RIDER 034 GAME WILD ANIMAL, GAME (INCLUDES BIRDS; NOT DEER OR ELK) 035 DEER ELK DEER OR ELK, WAPITI 036 ANML VEH ANIMAL-DRAWN VEHICLE 037 CULVERT CULVERT, OPEN LOW OR HIGH MANHOLE 038 ATENUATN IMPACT ATTENUATOR 039 PK METER PARKING METER 040 CURB CURB (ALSO NARROW SIDEWALKS ON BRIDGES) 041 JIGGLE JIGGLE BARS OR TRAFFIC SNAKE FOR CHANNELIZATION 042 GDRL END LEADING EDGE OF GUARDRAIL 043 GARDRAIL GUARD RAIL (NOT METAL MEDIAN BARRIER) 044 BARRIER MEDIAN BARRIER (RAISED OR METAL) 045 WALL RETAINING WALL OR TUNNEL WALL 046 BR RAIL BRIDGE RAILING (ON BRIDGE AND APPROACH) 047 BR ABUT BRIDGE ABUTMENT (APPROACH ENDS) 048 BR COLMN BRIDGE PILLAR OR COLUMN (EVEN THOUGH STRUCK PROTECTIVE GUARD RAIL FIRST) 049 BR GIRDR BRIDGE GIRDER (HORIZONTAL STRUCTURE OVERHEAD) 050 ISLAND TRAFFIC RAISED ISLAND 051 GORE GORE 052 POLE UNK POLE - TYPE UNKNOWN 053 POLE UTL POLE - POWER OR TELEPHONE 054 ST LIGHT POLE - STREET LIGHT ONLY 055 TRF SGNL POLE - TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND PED SIGNAL ONLY 056 SGN BRDG POLE - SIGN BRIDGE 057 STOPSIGN STOP OR YIELD SIGN 058 0TH SIGN OTHER SIGN, INCLUDING STREET SIGNS 059 HYDRANT HYDRANT EVENT CODE TRANSLATION LIST EVENT SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 060 MARKER DELINEATOR OR MARKER (REFLECTOR POSTS) 061 MAILBOX MAILBOX 062 TREE TREE, STUMP OR SHRUBS 063 VEG OHED TREE BRANCH OR OTHER VEGETATION OVERHEAD, ETC. 064 WIRE/CBL WIRE OR CABLE ACROSS OR OVER THE ROAD 065 TEMP SGN TEMPORARY SIGN OR BARRICADE IN ROAD, ETC. 066 PERM SGN PERMANENT SIGN OR BARRICADE IN/OFF ROAD 067 SLIDE SLIDES, FALLEN OR FALLING ROCKS 068 FRGN OBJ FOREIGN OBSTRUCTION/DEBRIS IN ROAD (NOT GRAVEL) 069 EQP WORK EQUIPMENT WORKING IN/OFF ROAD 070 0TH EQP OTHER EQUIPMENT IN OR OFF ROAD (INCLUDES PARKED TRAILER, BOAT) 071 MAIN EQP WRECKER, STREET SWEEPER, SNOW PLOW OR SANDING EQUIPMENT 072 OTHER WALL ROCK, BRICK OR OTHER SOLID WALL 073 IRRGL PVMT SPEED BUMP, OTHER BUMP, POTHOLE OR PAVEMENT IRREGULARITY (PER PAR) 075 CAVE IN BRIDGE OR ROAD CAVE IN 076 HI WATER HIGH WATER 077 SNO BANK SNOW BANK 078 HOLE CHUCKHOLE IN ROAD, LOW OR HIGH SHOULDER AT PAVEMENT EDGE 079 DITCH CUT SLOPE OR DITCH EMBANKMENT 080 OBJ F MV STRUCK BY ROCK OR OTHER OBJECT SET IN MOTION BY OTHER VEHICLE (INCL. LOST LOADS) 081 FLY-OBJ STRUCK BY OTHER MOVING OR FLYING OBJECT 082 VEH HID VEHICLE OBSCURED VIEW 083 VEG HID VEGETATION OBSCURED VIEW 084 BLDG HID VIEW OBSCURED BY FENCE, SIGN, PHONE BOOTH, ETC. 085 WIND GUST WIND GUST 086 IMMERSED VEHICLE IMMERSED IN BODY OF WATER 087 FIRE/EXP FIRE OR EXPLOSION 088 FENC/BLD FENCE OR BUILDING, ETC. 089 OTH ACDT ACCIDENT RELATED TO ANOTHER SEPARATE ACCIDENT 090 TO 1 SIDE TWO-WAY TRAFFIC ON DIVIDED ROADWAY ALL ROUTED TO ONE SIDE 092 PHANTOM OTHER (PHANTOM) NON-CONTACT VEHICLE (ON PAR OR REPORT) 093 CELL-POL CELL PHONE (ON PAR OR DRIVER IN USE) 094 VIOL GDL TEENAGE DRIVER IN VIOLATION OF GRADUATED LICENSE PGM 095 GUY WIRE GUY WIRE 096 BERM BERM (EARTHEN OR GRAVEL MOUND) 097 GRAVEL GRAVEL IN ROADWAY 098 ABR EDGE ABRUPT EDGE 099 CELL-WTN CELL PHONE USE WITNESSED BY OTHER PARTICIPANT 100 UNK FIXD UNKNOWN TYPE OF FIXED OBJECT 101 OTHER OBJ OTHER OR UNKNOWN OBJECT, NOT FIXED 104 OUTSIDE V PASSENGER RIDING ON VEHICLE EXTERIOR 105 PEDAL PSGR PASSENGER RIDING ON PEDALCYCLE 106 MAN WHLCHR PEDESTRIAN IN NON-MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR 107 MTR WHLCHR PEDESTRIAN IN MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR 110 N-MTR NON-MOTORIST STRUCK VEHICLE 111 S CAR VS V STREET CAR/TROLLEY (ON RAILS AND/OR OVERHEAD WIRE SYSTEM) STRUCK VEHICLE 112 V VS S CAR VEHICLE STRUCK STREET CAR/TROLLEY (ON RAILS AND/OR OVERHEAD WIRE SYSTEM) 113 S CAR ROW AT OR ON STREET CAR/TROLLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY 114 RR EQUIP VEHICLE STRUCK RAILROAD EQUIPMENT (NOT TRAIN) ON TRACKS 120 WIRE BAR WIRE OR CABLE MEDIAN BARRIER 124 SLIPPERY SLIDING OR SWERVING DUE TO WET, ICY, SLIPPERY OR LOOSE SURFACE 125 SHLDR SHOULDER GAVE WAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION TRANSLATION LIST HIGHWAY COMPONENT TRANSLATION LIST FUNC CLASS DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION 01 RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE 0 MAINLINE STATE HIGHWAY 02 RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER 1 COUPLET 06 RURAL MINOR ARTERIAL 3 FRONTAGE ROAD 07 RURAL MAJOR COLLECTOR 6 CONNECTION 8 HIGHWAY - OTHER 08 RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR 09 RURAL LOCAL 11 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE 12 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER FREEWAYS AND EXP 14 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER 16 URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL 17 URBAN COLLECTOR 19 URBAN LOCAL 78 UNKNOWN RURAL SYSTEM 79 UNKNOWN RURAL NON-SYSTEM 98 UNKNOWN URBAN SYSTEM 99 UNKNOWN URBAN NON-SYSTEM INJURY SEVERITY CODE TRANSLATION LIST LIGHT CONDITION CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 1 KILL FATAL INJURY 0 UNK UNKNOWN 2 INJA INCAPACITATING INJURY - BLEEDING, BROKEN BONES 1 DAY DAYLIGHT 3 INJB NON-INCAPACITATING INJURY 2 DLIT DARKNESS - WITH STREET LIGHTS 4 INJC POSSIBLE INJURY - COMPLAINT OF PAIN 3 DARK DARKNESS - NO STREET LIGHTS 5 PRI DIED PRIOR TO CRASH 4 DAWN DAWN (TWILIGHT) 7 NO<5 NO INJURY - 0 TO 4 YEARS OF AGE 5 DUSK DUSK (TWILIGHT) MEDIAN TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST MILEAGE TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE LONG DESCRIPTION 0 NONE NO MEDIAN 0 REGULAR MILEAGE 1 RSDMD SOLID MEDIAN BARRIER T TEMPORARY 2 DIVMD EARTH, GRASS OR PAVED MEDIAN Y SPUR Z OVERLAPPING MOVEMENT TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST PARTICIPANT TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 0 UNK UNKNOWN 0 OCC UNKNOWN OCCUPANT TYPE 1 STRGHT STRAIGHT AHEAD 1 DRVR DRIVER 2 TURN-R TURNING RIGHT 2 PSNG PASSENGER 3 TURN-L TURNING LEFT 3 PED PEDESTRIAN 4 CONV PEDESTRIAN USING A PEDESTRIAN CONVEYA 4 U-TURN MAKING A U-TURN 5 PTOW PEDESTRIAN TOWING OR TRAILERING AN OB 5 BACK BACKING 6 BIKE PEDALCYCLIST 6 STOP STOPPED IN TRAFFIC 7 BTOW PEDALCYCLIST TOWING OR TRAILERING AN i 7 PRKD-P PARKED - PROPERLY 8 PRKD OCCUPANT OF A PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE 8 PRKD-I PARKED - IMPROPERLY 9 UNK UNKNOWN TYPE OF NON-MOTORIST PEDESTRIAN LOCATION CODE TRANSLATION LIST TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE CODE TRANSLATION LIST CODE LONG DESCRIPTION CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 00 AT INTERSECTION - NOT IN ROADWAY 000 NONE NO CONTROL 01 AT INTERSECTION - INSIDE CROSSWALK 001 TRF SIGNAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS 02 AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY, OUTSIDE CROSSWALK 002 FLASHBCN-R FLASHING BEACON - RED (STOP) 03 AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY, XWALK AVAIL UNKNWN 003 FLASHBCN-A FLASHING BEACON - AMBER (SLOW) 04 NOT AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY 004 STOP SIGN STOP SIGN 05 NOT AT INTERSECTION - ON SHOULDER 005 SLOW SIGN SLOW SIGN 06 NOT AT INTERSECTION - ON MEDIAN 006 REG-SIGN REGULATORY SIGN 07 NOT AT INTERSECTION - WITHIN TRAFFIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 007 YIELD YIELD SIGN 08 NOT AT INTERSECTION - IN BIKE PATH 008 WARNING WARNING SIGN 09 NOT-AT INTERSECTION - ON SIDEWALK 009 CURVE CURVE SIGN 10 OUTSIDE TRAFFICWAY BOUNDARIES 010 SCHL X-ING SCHOOL CROSSING SIGN OR SPECIAL SIGNAL 15 NOT AT INTERSECTION - INSIDE MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK 011 OFCR/FLAG POLICE OFFICER, FLAGMAN - SCHOOL PATROL 18 OTHER, NOT IN ROADWAY 012 BRDG-GATE BRIDGE GATE - BARRIER 99 UNKNOWN LOCATION 013 TEMP-BARR TEMPORARY BARRIER 014 NO-PASS-ZN NO PASSING ZONE 015 ONE-WAY ONE-WAY STREET 016 CHANNEL CHANNELIZATION 017 MEDIAN BAR MEDIAN BARRIER 018 PILOT CAR PILOT CAR ROAD CHARACTER CODE TRANSLATION LIST 019 SP PED SIG SPECIAL PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL 020 X-BUCK CROSSBUCK SHORT 021 THR-GN-SIG THROUGH GREEN ARROW OR SIGNAL CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 022 L-GRN-SIG LEFT TURN GREEN ARROW, LANE MARKINGS, OR SIGNAL 0 UNK UNKNOWN 023 R-GRN-SIG RIGHT TURN GREEN ARROW, LANE MARKINGS, OR SIGNAL 1 INTER INTERSECTION 024 WIGWAG WIGWAG OR FLASHING LIGHTS W/O DROP-ARM GATE 2 ALLEY DRIVEWAY OR ALLEY 025 X-BUCK WRN CROSSBUCK AND ADVANCE WARNING 026 WW W/ GATE FLASHING LIGHTS WITH DROP-ARM GATES 3 STRGHT STRAIGHT ROADWAY 027 OVRHD SGNL SUPPLEMENTAL OVERHEAD SIGNAL (RR XING ONLY) 4 TRANS TRANSITION 028 SP RR STOP SPECIAL RR STOP SIGN 5 CURVE CURVE (HORIZONTAL CURVE) 029 ILUM GRD X ILLUMINATED GRADE CROSSING 6 OPENAC OPEN ACCESS OR TURNOUT 037 RAMP METER METERED RAMPS 7 GRADE GRADE (VERTICAL CURVE) 038 RUMBLE STR RUMBLE STRIP 8 BRIDGE BRIDGE STRUCTURE 090 L-TURN REF LEFT TURN REFUGE (WHEN REFUGE IS INVOLVED) 9 TUNNEL TUNNEL 091 R-TURN ALL RIGHT TURN AT ALL TIMES SIGN, ETC. 092 EMR SGN/FL EMERGENCY SIGNS OR FLARES 093 ACCEL LANE ACCELERATION OR DECELERATION LANES 094 R-TURN PRO RIGHT TURN PROHIBITED ON RED AFTER STOPPING 095 BUS STPSGN BUS STOP SIGN AND RED LIGHTS 099 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN OR NOT DEFINITE VEHICLE TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST WEATHER CONDITION CODE TRANSLATION LIST CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 01 PSNGR CAR PASSENGER CAR, PICKUP, ETC. 0 UNK UNKNOWN 02 BOBTAIL TRUCK TRACTOR WITH NO TRAILERS (BOBTAIL) 1 CLR CLEAR 03 FARM TRCTR FARM TRACTOR OR SELF-PROPELLED FARM EQUIPMENT 2 CLD CLOUDY 04 SEMI TOW TRUCK TRACTOR WITH TRAILER/MOBILE HOME IN TOW 3 RAIN RAIN 05 TRUCK TRUCK WITH NON-DETACHABLE BED, PANEL, ETC. 4 SLT SLEET 06 MOPED MOPED, MINIBIKE, MOTOR SCOOTER, OR MOTOR BICYCLE 5 FOG FOG 07 SCHL BUS SCHOOL BUS (INCLUDES VAN) 6 SNOW SNOW 08 0TH BUS OTHER BUS 7 DUST DUST 09 MTRCYCLE MOTORCYCLE 8 SMOK SMOKE 10 OTHER OTHER: FORKLIFT, BACKHOE, ETC. 9 ASH ASH 11 MOTRHOME MOTORHOME 12 TROLLEY MOTORIZED STREET CAR/TROLLEY (NO RAILS/WIRES) 13 ATV ATV 14 MTRSCTR MOTORIZED SCOOTER 15 SNOWMOBILE SNOWMOBILE 99 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN VEHICLE TYPE CDS150 07/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION-CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE OR 99W(Hwy 091)@ OR 217(Hwy 144)Southbound ramps January 1,2007 through December 31,2011 NON- PROPERTY INTER- FATAL FATAL DAMAGE TOTAL PEOPLE PEOPLE DRY WET INTER- SECTION OFF- COLLISION TYPE CRASHES CRASHES ONLY CRASHES KILLED INJURED TRUCKS SURF SURF DAY DARK SECTION RELATED ROAD YEAR: 2011 REAR-END 0 3 2 5 0 4 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 2 1 3 0 2 1 0 3 2 1 3 0 0 2011 TOTAL 0 5 3 8 0 6 1 5 3 7 1 8 0 0 YEAR: 2010 ANGLE 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 REAR-END 0 3 2 5 0 3 0 4 1 5 0 5 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 1 2 3 0 2 0 2 1 1 2 3 0 0 2010 TOTAL 0 4 5 9 0 5 0 6 3 6 3 9 0 0 YEAR: 2009 REAR-END 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 4 4 0 0 1 3 0 3 1 4 0 0 2009 TOTAL 0 0 6 6 0 0 1 5 0 5 1 6 0 0 YEAR: 2008 REAR-END 0 2 2 4 0 2 0 2 2 3 1 4 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2008 TOTAL 0 2 3 5 0 2 0 3 2 4 1 5 0 0 YEAR: 2007 REAR-END 0 1 3 4 0 1 0 2 1 3 1 4 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2007 TOTAL 0 1 4 5 0 1 0 3 1 4 1 5 0 0 FINAL TOTAL 0 12 21 33 0 14 2 22 9 26 7 33 0 0 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes are reported for the 2011 data file compared to previous years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Southbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 00491 YNNYY 01/23/2007 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N UNK S-1STOP 01 NONE STRGHT 01 NO RPT Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N UNK REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 6P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 06 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 24 F UNK 026,047 000 01 OR<25 02 NONE STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03 NONE STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 49 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 89410 N N N 08/19/2008 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NO RPT Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 10P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 06 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 38 M OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 29 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 01632 N N N 04/10/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 32,07 NO RPT Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 11A PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 35 F OR-Y 052,026 000 32,07 OR<25 02 PSNG NO<5 04 F 000 000 00 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 41 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03672 NNNNN 07/24/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 UNKN 0 STRGHT 013 07 CITY Sat TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 2P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EF PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 M OR-Y 043,026 000 07 OR>25 02 UNKN 9 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 66 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 022 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 40 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 2 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Southbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 02866 NNNNN 06/03/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 1 STRGHT 07 CITY Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 9A PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 38 M OR-Y 043,026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 57 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 20 M 000 000 00 05600 YNNNN 09/21/2007 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE STRGHT 01 STATE Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 6P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EF PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 21 F OR-Y 026,047 026 01 OR<25 02 NONE STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 05749 YNNYY 09/28/2007 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLD S-1STOP 01 NONE STRGHT 013 01 Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 2P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EF PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 U UNK 026,047 000 01 UNK 02 NONE STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 U UNK 000 000 00 UNK 03 NONE STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 51 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 04 NONE STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 U UNK 000 000 00 UNK 05392 N N N 10/03/2008 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 UNKN 9 STRGHT 013 07 NONE Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR UNKN SW NE 000 00 11A PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EF PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 026 000 07 UNK 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 58 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 3 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Southbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 03 UNKN 0 STOP UNKN SW NE 022 00 UNKNOWN 01 DRVR NONE 00 U UNK 000 000 00 UNK 05175 N N N 10/15/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NO RPT Thu TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 10A PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 51 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 35 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 01563 N N N 04/05/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE Mon TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 4P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EF PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 23 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 55 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03531 NNNNN 07/18/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY Sun TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 10A PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EF PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 F OR-Y 043,026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 66 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 07471 N N N 08/06/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR UNKN NE SW 000 00 5P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 U UNK 026 000 07 UNK 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 53 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03309 N N N 06/24/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 10 NONE Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 4P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EF PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 29 F OTH-Y 014,026 000 10 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 55 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 4 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Southbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 03627 N N N 07/12/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 11A PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EF PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 M OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 40 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 05008 N N N 10/09/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR ANGL-STP 01 NONE 1 TURN-L 012 08 NO RPT Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE NW NE 000 012 00 4P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 01 0 N DAY PDO SEMI TOW 01 DRVR NONE 50 M OR-Y 002,080 000 08 OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 012 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG NO<5 01 F 000 000 00 00199 N N N 01/11/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 UNKN 9 TURN-L 04 NONE Mon TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN ONE-WAY N DRY TURN PRVTE NW NE 000 00 9A PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 01 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 020 000 04 UNK 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE NE SW 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR>25 05895 N N N 10/30/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N RAIN ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 04 NONE Sat TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N WET ANGL UNKN NE SW 000 00 9P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 01 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 F OR-Y 020 000 04 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE NW SE 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 76 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 00226 NNNNN 01/12/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-OTHER 01 NONE 1 TURN-L 012 08 CITY Wed TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N WET TURN PRVTE NW NE 000 012 00 12P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 01 0 N DAY PDO SEMI TOW 01 DRVR NONE 53 M OTH-Y 002 000 08 N-RES 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE NW NE 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 75 F OTH-Y 000 000 00 N-RES CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 5 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Southbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 04788 N N N 08/19/2007 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NO RPT Sun TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 5P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EF PAC HY 1W C2 02 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 37 M OTH-Y 026 000 07 N-RES 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 58 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 05337 N N N 09/13/2007 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 UNKN 9 STRGHT 04 NONE Thu TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN ONE-WAY N DRY TURN UNKN SW NE 000 00 2P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 02 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK 020 000 04 UNK 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE NW NE 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 51 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 01105 N N N 03/10/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR 0-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 04 NONE Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN ONE-WAY N DRY TURN PRVTE SW NE 000 00 12A PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EF PAC HY 1W C2 02 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 51 M OR-Y 020 000 04 OR<25 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE NE SE 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02532 NNNNN 05/25/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N RAIN 0-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 04 CITY Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN L-GRN-SIG N WET TURN PRVTE SW NE 000 00 9P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EF PAC HY 1W C2 02 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 F OR-Y 020 000 04 OR>25 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE NE SE 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 40 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 06552 N N N 11/21/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER UNKNOWN N N RAIN 0-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 04 NONE Mon TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN L-GRN-SIG N WET TURN PRVTE SW NE 000 00 8P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EF PAC HY 1W C2 03 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F OR-Y 020 000 04 OR<25 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE NE SE 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 19 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 05856 N N N 11/19/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N UNK S-OTHER 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 27 NO RPT Thu TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N UNK TURN PRVTE NW NE 000 00 2P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 04 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 34 F OR-Y 016,080 038 27 OR<25 CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 6 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Southbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE NW NE 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 05529 NNNNN 10/16/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 04 CITY Sat TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE NW NE 000 00 l0P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 04 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 43 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE SW NE 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 60 M OR-Y 020 000 04 OR<25 01349 N N N 03/07/2008 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 9 STRGHT 07 NONE Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR GOVMT SW NE 000 00 12P PORTLAND UA 8.69 SB EF PAC HY 1W C2 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 47 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG NO<5 02 M 000 000 00 CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 7 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 144 BEAVERTON-TIGARD OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Southbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 05089 NNNNN 09/22/2008 WASHINGTON 1 19 1 INTER CROSS N N CLD S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 10 CITY Mon TIGARD 6 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NW SE 000 00 7A PORTLAND UA 5.90 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 41 M OTH-Y 014,026 000 10 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NW SE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 30 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 06679 N N N 12/05/2008 WASHINGTON 1 19 1 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-OTHER 01 NONE 0 TURN-R 07 NONE Fri TIGARD 6 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NW TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE NW SW 000 00 9A PORTLAND UA 5.90 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 M OR-Y 026 000 07 OR>25 02 NONE 0 TURN-R PRVTE NW SW 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 47 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03534 YNNNN 07/22/2009 WASHINGTON 1 19 1 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-OTHER 01 UNKN 9 TURN-R 01 CITY Wed TIGARD 6 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NW TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN UNKN NW SW 000 00 3P PORTLAND UA 5.90 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 047,042 000 01 UNK 02 NONE 0 TURN-R PRVTE NW SW 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 66 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03752 Y N N 07/30/2010 WASHINGTON 1 19 1 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 004 01 NO RPT Fri TIGARD 6 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NW SE 000 00 7P PORTLAND UA 5.90 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 21 F OR-Y 047,026 000 01 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NW SE 011 004 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 51 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR>25 00205 NNNNN 01/12/2011 WASHINGTON 1 19 1 INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-OTHER 01 NONE 0 TURN-R 07 CITY Wed TIGARD 6 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NW TRF SIGNAL N WET TURN PRVTE NW SW 000 00 8A PORTLAND UA 5.90 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 55 F OR-Y 014,026 000 10 OR<25 02 NONE 0 TURN-R PRVTE NW SW 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 42 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02357 NNNNN 05/06/2011 WASHINGTON 1 19 1 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 TURN-R 07,10 CITY Fri TIGARD 6 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NW SW 000 00 9A PORTLAND UA 5.90 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 M OR-Y 043,014,026 000 07,10 OR<25 CDS380 7/18/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 8 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 144 BEAVERTON-TIGARD OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ OR 217 (Hwy 144) Southbound ramps January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 02 NONE 0 STOP PUBLC NW SE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 50 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR>25 06153 N N N 11/04/2011 WASHINGTON 1 19 1 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 10 NONE Fri TIGARD 6 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NW SE 000 00 2P PORTLAND UA 5.90 SB EX PAC HY 1W Cl 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 65 M OR-Y 026 088 10 OR<25 02 UNKN 0 STOP UNKN NW SE 011 00 UNKNOWN 01 DRVR NONE 00 U UNK 000 000 00 UNK ACTION CODE TRANSLATION LIST ACTION SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 000 NONE NO ACTION OR NON-WARRANTED 001 SKIDDED SKIDDED 002 ON/OFF V GETTING ON OR OFF STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE 003 LOAD OVR OVERHANGING LOAD STRUCK ANOTHER VEHICLE, ETC. 006 SLOW DN SLOWED DOWN 007 AVOIDING AVOIDING MANEUVER 008 PAR PARK PARALLEL PARKING 009 ANG PARK ANGLE PARKING 010 INTERFERE PASSENGER INTERFERING WITH DRIVER 011 STOPPED STOPPED IN TRAFFIC NOT WAITING TO MAKE A LEFT TURN 012 STP/L TRN STOPPED BECAUSE OF LEFT TURN SIGNAL OR WAITING, ETC. 013 STP TURN STOPPED WHILE EXECUTING A TURN 015 GO A/STOP PROCEED AFTER STOPPING FOR A STOP SIGN/FLASHING RED. 016 TRN A/RED TURNED ON RED AFTER STOPPING 017 LOSTCTRL LOST CONTROL OF VEHICLE 018 EXIT DWY ENTERING STREET OR HIGHWAY FROM ALLEY OR DRIVEWAY 019 ENTR DWY ENTERING ALLEY OR DRIVEWAY FROM STREET OR HIGHWAY 020 STR ENTR BEFORE ENTERING ROADWAY, STRUCK PEDESTRIAN, ETC. ON SIDEWALK OR SHOULDER 021 NO DRVR CAR RAN AWAY - NO DRIVER 022 PREV COL STRUCK, OR WAS STRUCK BY, VEHICLE OR PEDESTRIAN IN PRIOR COLLISION BEFORE ACC. STABILIZED 023 STALLED VEHICLE STALLED 024 DRVR DEAD DEAD BY UNASSOCIATED CAUSE 025 FATIGUE FATIGUED, SLEEPY, ASLEEP 026 SUN DRIVER BLINDED BY SUN 027 HDLGHTS DRIVER BLINDED BY HEADLIGHTS 028 ILLNESS PHYSICALLY ILL 029 THRU MED VEHICLE CROSSED, PLUNGED OVER, OR THROUGH MEDIAN BARRIER 030 PURSUIT PURSUING OR ATTEMPTING TO STOP ANOTHER VEHICLE 031 PASSING PASSING SITUATION 032 PRKOFFRD VEHICLE PARKED BEYOND CURB OR SHOULDER 033 CROS MED VEHICLE CROSSED EARTH OR GRASS MEDIAN 034 X N/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - NO TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 035 X W/ SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 036 DIAGONAL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - DIAGONALLY 037 BTWN INT CROSSING BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS 038 DISTRACT DRIVER'S ATTENTION DISTRACTED 039 W/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER WITH TRAFFIC 040 A/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER FACING TRAFFIC 041 W/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT WITH TRAFFIC 042 A/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT FACING TRAFFIC 043 PLAYINRD PLAYING IN STREET OR ROAD 044 PUSH MV PUSHING OR WORKING ON VEHICLE IN ROAD OR ON SHOULDER 045 WORK ON WORKING IN ROADWAY OR ALONG SHOULDER 050 LAY ON RD STANDING OR LYING IN ROADWAY 051 ENT OFFRD ENTERING / STARTING IN TRAFFIC LANE FROM OFF-ROAD 088 OTHER OTHER ACTION 099 UNK UNKNOWN ACTION CAUSE CODE TRANSLATION LIST COLLISION TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST CAUSE SHORT COLL SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 00 NO CODE NO CAUSE ASSOCIATED AT THIS LEVEL & 0TH MISCELLANEOUS 01 TOO-FAST TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS (NOT EXCEED POSTED SPEED - BACK BACKING 02 NO-YIELD DID NOT YIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 PED PEDESTRIAN 03 PAS-STOP PASSED STOP SIGN OR RED FLASHER 1 ANGL ANGLE 04 DIS--RAG DISREGARDED R-A-G TRAFFIC SIGNAL. 2 HEAD HEAD-ON 05 LEFT-CTR DROVE LEFT OF CENTER ON TWO-WAY ROAD 3 REAR REAR-END 06 IMP-OVER IMPROPER OVERTAKING 4 SS-M SIDESWIPE - MEETING 07 TOO-CLOS FOLLOWED TOO CLOSELY 5 SS-0 SIDESWIPE - OVERTAKING 08 IMP-TURN MADE IMPROPER TURN 6 TURN TURNING MOVEMENT 09 DRINKING ALCOHOL OR DRUG INVOLVED 7 PARK PARKING MANEUVER 10 OTHR-IMP OTHER IMPROPER DRIVING 8 NCOL NON-COLLISION 11 MECH-DEF MECHANICAL DEFECT 9 FIX FIXED OBJECT OR OTHER OBJECT 12 OTHER OTHER (NOT IMPROPER DRIVING) 13 IMP LN C IMPROPER CHANGE OF TRAFFIC LANES 14 DIS TCD DISREGARDED OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE 15 WRNG WAY WRONG WAY ON ONE-WAY ROADWAY 16 FATIGUE DRIVER DROWSY/FATIGUED/SLEEPY 18 IN RDWY NON-MOTORIST ILLEGALLY IN ROADWAY 19 NT VISBL NON-MOTORIST CLOTHING NOT VISIBLE 20 IMP PKNG VEHICLE IMPROPERLY PARKED 21 DEF STER DEFECTIVE STEERING MECHANISM CRASH TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST 22 DEF BRKE INADEQUATE OR NO BRAKES 24 LOADSHFT VEHICLE LOST LOAD OR LOAD SHIFTED CRASH SHORT 25 TIREFAIL TIRE FAILURE TYPE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 26 PHANTOM PHANTOM / NON-CONTACT VEHICLE & OVERTURN OVERTURNED 27 INATTENT INATTENTION 0 NON-COLL OTHER NON-COLLISION 30 SPEED DRIVING IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED 1 0TH RDWY MOTOR VEHICLE ON OTHER ROADWAY 31 RACING SPEED RACING (PER PAR) 2 PRKD MV PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE 32 CARELESS CARELESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 3 PED PEDESTRIAN 33 RECKLESS RECKLESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 4 TRAIN RAILWAY TRAIN 34 AGGRESV AGGRESSIVE DRIVING (PER PAR) 6 BIKE PEDALCYCLIST 35 RD RAGE ROAD RAGE (PER PAR) 7 ANIMAL ANIMAL 8 FIX OBJ FIXED OBJECT 9 OTH OBJ OTHER OBJECT A ANGL-STP ENTERING AT ANGLE - ONE VEHICLE STOPPED B ANGL-OTH ENTERING AT ANGLE - ALL OTHERS C S-STRGHT FROM SAME DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT D S-1TURN FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT E S-1STOP FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED F S-OTHER FROM SAME DIRECTION-ALL OTHERS, INCLUDING PARKING G O-STRGHT FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT H 0-1TURN FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT I 0-1STOP FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED J 0-OTHER FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION-ALL OTHERS INCL. PARKING DRIVER LICENSE CODE TRANSLATION LIST DRIVER RESIDENCE CODE TRANSLATION LIST LIC SHORT RES SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 0 NONE NOT LICENSED (HAD NEVER BEEN LICENSED) 1 OR<25 OREGON RESIDENT WITHIN 25 MILE OF HOME 1 OR-Y VALID OREGON LICENSE 2 OR>25 OREGON RESIDENT 25 OR MORE MILES FROM HOME 2 OTH-Y VALID LICENSE, OTHER STATE OR COUNTRY 3 OR-? OREGON RESIDENT - UNKNOWN DISTANCE FROM HOME 4 N-RES NON-RESIDENT 3 SUSP SUSPENDED/REVOKED 9 UNK UNKNOWN IF OREGON RESIDENT ERROR CODE TRANSLATION LIST ERROR SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION 000 NONE NO ERROR 001 WIDE TRN WIDE TURN 002 CUT CORN CUT CORNER ON TURN 003 FAIL TRN FAILED TO OBEY MANDATORY TRAFFIC TURN SIGNAL, SIGN OR LANE MARKINGS 004 L IN TRF LEFT TURN IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC 005 L PROHIB LEFT TURN WHERE PROHIBITED 006 FRM WRNG TURNED FROM WRONG LANE 007 TO WRONG TURNED INTO WRONG LANE 008 ILLEG U U-TURNED ILLEGALLY 009 IMP STOP IMPROPERLY STOPPED IN TRAFFIC LANE 010 IMP SIG IMPROPER SIGNAL OR FAILURE TO SIGNAL 011 IMP BACK BACKING IMPROPERLY (NOT PARKING) 012 IMP PARK IMPROPERLY PARKED 013 UNPARK IMPROPER START LEAVING PARKED POSITION 014 IMP STRT IMPROPER START FROM STOPPED POSITION 015 IMP LGHT IMPROPER OR NO LIGHTS (VEHICLE IN TRAFFIC) 016 INATTENT FAILED TO DIM LIGHTS (UNTIL 4/1/97) / INATTENTION (AFTER 4/1/97) 017 UNSF VEH DRIVING UNSAFE VEHICLE (NO OTHER ERROR APPARENT) 018 OTH PARK ENTERING/EXITING PARKED POSITION W/ INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE; OTHER IMPROPER PARKING MANEUVER 019 DIS DRIV DISREGARDED OTHER DRIVER'S SIGNAL 020 DIS SGNL DISREGARDED TRAFFIC SIGNAL 021 RAN STOP DISREGARDED STOP SIGN OR FLASHING RED 022 DIS SIGN DISREGARDED WARNING SIGN, FLARES OR FLASHING AMBER 023 DIS OFCR DISREGARDED POLICE OFFICER OR FLAGMAN 024 DIS EMER DISREGARDED SIREN OR WARNING OF EMERGENCY VEHICLE 025 DIS RR DISREGARDED RR SIGNAL, RR SIGN, OR RR FLAGMAN 026 REAR-END FAILED TO AVOID STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE AHEAD OTHER THAN SCHOOL BUS 027 BIKE ROW DID NOT HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY OVER PEDALCYCLIST 028 NO ROW DID NOT HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY 029 PED ROW FAILED TO YIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO PEDESTRIAN 030 PAS CURV PASSING ON A CURVE 031 PAS WRNG PASSING ON THE WRONG SIDE 032 PAS TANG PASSING ON STRAIGHT ROAD UNDER UNSAFE CONDITIONS 033 PAS X-WK PASSED VEHICLE STOPPED AT CROSSWALK FOR PEDESTRIAN 034 PAS INTR PASSING AT INTERSECTION 035 PAS HILL PASSING ON CREST OF HILL 036 N/PAS ZN PASSING IN "NO PASSING" ZONE 037 PAS TRAF PASSING IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC 038 CUT-IN CUTTING IN (TWO LANES - TWO WAY ONLY) 039 WRNGSIDE DRIVING ON WRONG SIDE OF THE ROAD 040 THRU MED DRIVING THROUGH SAFETY ZONE OR OVER ISLAND 041 F/ST BUS FAILED TO STOP FOR SCHOOL BUS ERROR CODE TRANSLATION LIST ERROR SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION 042 F/SLO MV FAILED TO DECREASE SPEED FOR SLOWER MOVING VEHICLE 043 TO CLOSE FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY (MUST BE ON OFFICER'S REPORT) 044 STRDL LN STRADDLING OR DRIVING ON WRONG LANES 045 IMP CHG IMPROPER CHANGE OF TRAFFIC LANES 046 WRNG WAY WRONG WAY ON ONE-WAY ROADWAY (DELIBERATELY TRAVELING ON WRONG SIDE) 047 BASCRULE DRIVING TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS (NOT EXCEEDING POSTED SPEED) 048 OPN DOOR OPENED DOOR INTO ADJACENT TRAFFIC LANE 049 IMPEDING IMPEDING TRAFFIC 050 SPEED DRIVING IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED 051 RECKLESS RECKLESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 052 CARELESS CARELESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 053 RACING SPEED RACING (PER PAR) 054 X N/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION, NO TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 055 X W/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION, TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 056 DIAGONAL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - DIAGONALLY 057 BTWN INT CROSSING BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS 059 W/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER WITH TRAFFIC 060 A/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER FACING TRAFFIC 061 W/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT WITH TRAFFIC 062 A/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT FACING TRAFFIC 063 PLAYINRD PLAYING IN STREET OR ROAD 064 PUSH MV PUSHING OR WORKING ON VEHICLE IN ROAD OR ON SHOULDER 065 WK IN RD WORKING IN ROADWAY OR ALONG SHOULDER 070 LAYON RD STANDING OR LYING IN ROADWAY 073 ELUDING ELUDING 080 FAIL LN FAILED TO MAINTAIN LANE 081 OFF RD RAN OFF ROAD 082 NO CLEAR DRIVER MISJUDGED CLEARANCE 083 OVRSTEER OVERCORRECTING 084 NOT USED CODE NOT IN USE 085 OVRLOAD OVERLOADING OR IMPROPER LOADING OF VEHICLE WITH CARGO OR PASSENGERS 097 UNA DIS TC UNABLE TO DETERMINE WHICH DRIVER DISREGARDED TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE EVENT CODE TRANSLATION LIST EVENT SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 001 FEL/JUMP OCCUPANT FELL, JUMPED OR WAS EJECTED FROM MOVING VEHICLE 002 INTERFER PASSENGER INTERFERED WITH DRIVER 003 BUG INTF ANIMAL OR INSECT IN VEHICLE INTERFERED WITH DRIVER 004 PED INV PEDESTRIAN INVOLVED (NON-PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENT) 005 SUB-PED "SUB-PED": PEDESTRIAN INJURED SUBSEQUENT TO COLLISION, ETC. 006 BIKE INV TRICYCLE-BICYCLE INVOLVED 007 HITCHIKR HITCHHIKER (SOLICITING A RIDE) 008 PSNGR TOW PASSENGER BEING TOWED OR PUSHED ON CONVEYANCE 009 ON/OFF V GETTING ON OR OFF STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE (OCCUPANTS ONLY) 010 SUB OTRN OVERTURNED AFTER FIRST HARMFUL EVENT 011 MV PUSHD VEHICLE BEING PUSHED 012 MV TOWED VEHICLE TOWED OR HAD BEEN TOWING ANOTHER VEHICLE 013 FORCED VEHICLE FORCED BY IMPACT INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE, PEDALCYCLIST OR PEDESTRIAN 014 SET MOTN VEHICLE SET IN MOTION BY NON-DRIVER (CHILD RELEASED BRAKES, ETC.) 015 RR ROW AT OR ON RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY (NOT LIGHT RAIL) 016 LT RL ROW AT OR ON LIGHT-RAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY 017 RR HIT V TRAIN STRUCK VEHICLE 018 V HIT RR VEHICLE STRUCK TRAIN 019 HIT RR CAR VEHICLE STRUCK RAILROAD CAR ON ROADWAY 020 JACKNIFE JACKKNIFE; TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE STRUCK TOWING VEHICLE 021 TRL OTRN TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE OVERTURNED 022 CN BROKE TRAILER CONNECTION BROKE 023 DETACH TRL DETACHED TRAILING OBJECT STRUCK OTHER VEHICLE, NON-MOTORIST, OR OBJECT 024 V DOOR OPN VEHICLE DOOR OPENED INTO ADJACENT TRAFFIC LANE 025 WHEELOFF WHEEL CAME OFF 026 HOOD UP HOOD FLEW UP 028 LOAD SHIFT LOST LOAD, LOAD MOVED OR SHIFTED 029 TIREFAIL TIRE FAILURE 030 PET PET: CAT, DOG AND SIMILAR 031 LVSTOCK STOCK: COW, CALF, BULL, STEER, SHEEP, ETC. 032 HORSE HORSE, MULE, OR DONKEY 033 HRSE&RID HORSE AND RIDER 034 GAME WILD ANIMAL, GAME (INCLUDES BIRDS; NOT DEER OR ELK) 035 DEER ELK DEER OR ELK, WAPITI 036 ANML VEH ANIMAL-DRAWN VEHICLE 037 CULVERT CULVERT, OPEN LOW OR HIGH MANHOLE 038 ATENUATN IMPACT ATTENUATOR 039 PK METER PARKING METER 040 CURB CURB (ALSO NARROW SIDEWALKS ON BRIDGES) 041 JIGGLE JIGGLE BARS OR TRAFFIC SNAKE FOR CHANNELIZATION 042 GDRL END LEADING EDGE OF GUARDRAIL 043 GARDRAIL GUARD RAIL (NOT METAL MEDIAN BARRIER) 044 BARRIER MEDIAN BARRIER (RAISED OR METAL) 045 WALL RETAINING WALL OR TUNNEL WALL 046 BR RAIL BRIDGE RAILING (ON BRIDGE AND APPROACH) 047 BR ABUT BRIDGE ABUTMENT (APPROACH ENDS) 048 BR COLMN BRIDGE PILLAR OR COLUMN (EVEN THOUGH STRUCK PROTECTIVE GUARD RAIL FIRST) 049 BR GIRDR BRIDGE GIRDER (HORIZONTAL STRUCTURE OVERHEAD) 050 ISLAND TRAFFIC RAISED ISLAND 051 GORE GORE 052 POLE UNK POLE - TYPE UNKNOWN 053 POLE UTL POLE - POWER OR TELEPHONE 054 ST LIGHT POLE - STREET LIGHT ONLY 055 TRF SGNL POLE - TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND PED SIGNAL ONLY 056 SGN BRDG POLE - SIGN BRIDGE 057 STOPSIGN STOP OR YIELD SIGN 058 0TH SIGN OTHER SIGN, INCLUDING STREET SIGNS 059 HYDRANT HYDRANT EVENT CODE TRANSLATION LIST EVENT SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 060 MARKER DELINEATOR OR MARKER (REFLECTOR POSTS) 061 MAILBOX MAILBOX 062 TREE TREE, STUMP OR SHRUBS 063 VEG OHED TREE BRANCH OR OTHER VEGETATION OVERHEAD, ETC. 064 WIRE/CBL WIRE OR CABLE ACROSS OR OVER THE ROAD 065 TEMP SGN TEMPORARY SIGN OR BARRICADE IN ROAD, ETC. 066 PERM SGN PERMANENT SIGN OR BARRICADE IN/OFF ROAD 067 SLIDE SLIDES, FALLEN OR FALLING ROCKS 068 FRGN OBJ FOREIGN OBSTRUCTION/DEBRIS IN ROAD (NOT GRAVEL) 069 EQP WORK EQUIPMENT WORKING IN/OFF ROAD 070 0TH EQP OTHER EQUIPMENT IN OR OFF ROAD (INCLUDES PARKED TRAILER, BOAT) 071 MAIN EQP WRECKER, STREET SWEEPER, SNOW PLOW OR SANDING EQUIPMENT 072 OTHER WALL ROCK, BRICK OR OTHER SOLID WALL 073 IRRGL PVMT SPEED BUMP, OTHER BUMP, POTHOLE OR PAVEMENT IRREGULARITY (PER PAR) 075 CAVE IN BRIDGE OR ROAD CAVE IN 076 HI WATER HIGH WATER 077 SNO BANK SNOW BANK 078 HOLE CHUCKHOLE IN ROAD, LOW OR HIGH SHOULDER AT PAVEMENT EDGE 079 DITCH CUT SLOPE OR DITCH EMBANKMENT 080 OBJ F MV STRUCK BY ROCK OR OTHER OBJECT SET IN MOTION BY OTHER VEHICLE (INCL. LOST LOADS) 081 FLY-OBJ STRUCK BY OTHER MOVING OR FLYING OBJECT 082 VEH HID VEHICLE OBSCURED VIEW 083 VEG HID VEGETATION OBSCURED VIEW 084 BLDG HID VIEW OBSCURED BY FENCE, SIGN, PHONE BOOTH, ETC. 085 WIND GUST WIND GUST 086 IMMERSED VEHICLE IMMERSED IN BODY OF WATER 087 FIRE/EXP FIRE OR EXPLOSION 088 FENC/BLD FENCE OR BUILDING, ETC. 089 OTH ACDT ACCIDENT RELATED TO ANOTHER SEPARATE ACCIDENT 090 TO 1 SIDE TWO-WAY TRAFFIC ON DIVIDED ROADWAY ALL ROUTED TO ONE SIDE 092 PHANTOM OTHER (PHANTOM) NON-CONTACT VEHICLE (ON PAR OR REPORT) 093 CELL-POL CELL PHONE (ON PAR OR DRIVER IN USE) 094 VIOL GDL TEENAGE DRIVER IN VIOLATION OF GRADUATED LICENSE PGM 095 GUY WIRE GUY WIRE 096 BERM BERM (EARTHEN OR GRAVEL MOUND) 097 GRAVEL GRAVEL IN ROADWAY 098 ABR EDGE ABRUPT EDGE 099 CELL-WTN CELL PHONE USE WITNESSED BY OTHER PARTICIPANT 100 UNK FIXD UNKNOWN TYPE OF FIXED OBJECT 101 OTHER OBJ OTHER OR UNKNOWN OBJECT, NOT FIXED 104 OUTSIDE V PASSENGER RIDING ON VEHICLE EXTERIOR 105 PEDAL PSGR PASSENGER RIDING ON PEDALCYCLE 106 MAN WHLCHR PEDESTRIAN IN NON-MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR 107 MTR WHLCHR PEDESTRIAN IN MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR 110 N-MTR NON-MOTORIST STRUCK VEHICLE 111 S CAR VS V STREET CAR/TROLLEY (ON RAILS AND/OR OVERHEAD WIRE SYSTEM) STRUCK VEHICLE 112 V VS S CAR VEHICLE STRUCK STREET CAR/TROLLEY (ON RAILS AND/OR OVERHEAD WIRE SYSTEM) 113 S CAR ROW AT OR ON STREET CAR/TROLLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY 114 RR EQUIP VEHICLE STRUCK RAILROAD EQUIPMENT (NOT TRAIN) ON TRACKS 120 WIRE BAR WIRE OR CABLE MEDIAN BARRIER 124 SLIPPERY SLIDING OR SWERVING DUE TO WET, ICY, SLIPPERY OR LOOSE SURFACE 125 SHLDR SHOULDER GAVE WAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION TRANSLATION LIST HIGHWAY COMPONENT TRANSLATION LIST FUNC CLASS DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION 01 RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE 0 MAINLINE STATE HIGHWAY 02 RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER 1 COUPLET 06 RURAL MINOR ARTERIAL 3 FRONTAGE ROAD 07 RURAL MAJOR COLLECTOR 6 CONNECTION 8 HIGHWAY - OTHER 08 RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR 09 RURAL LOCAL 11 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE 12 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER FREEWAYS AND EXP 14 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER 16 URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL 17 URBAN COLLECTOR 19 URBAN LOCAL 78 UNKNOWN RURAL SYSTEM 79 UNKNOWN RURAL NON-SYSTEM 98 UNKNOWN URBAN SYSTEM 99 UNKNOWN URBAN NON-SYSTEM INJURY SEVERITY CODE TRANSLATION LIST LIGHT CONDITION CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 1 KILL FATAL INJURY 0 UNK UNKNOWN 2 INJA INCAPACITATING INJURY - BLEEDING, BROKEN BONES 1 DAY DAYLIGHT 3 INJB NON-INCAPACITATING INJURY 2 DLIT DARKNESS - WITH STREET LIGHTS 4 INJC POSSIBLE INJURY - COMPLAINT OF PAIN 3 DARK DARKNESS - NO STREET LIGHTS 5 PRI DIED PRIOR TO CRASH 4 DAWN DAWN (TWILIGHT) 7 NO<5 NO INJURY - 0 TO 4 YEARS OF AGE 5 DUSK DUSK (TWILIGHT) MEDIAN TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST MILEAGE TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE LONG DESCRIPTION 0 NONE NO MEDIAN 0 REGULAR MILEAGE 1 RSDMD SOLID MEDIAN BARRIER T TEMPORARY 2 DIVMD EARTH, GRASS OR PAVED MEDIAN Y SPUR Z OVERLAPPING MOVEMENT TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST PARTICIPANT TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 0 UNK UNKNOWN 0 OCC UNKNOWN OCCUPANT TYPE 1 STRGHT STRAIGHT AHEAD 1 DRVR DRIVER 2 TURN-R TURNING RIGHT 2 PSNG PASSENGER 3 TURN-L TURNING LEFT 3 PED PEDESTRIAN 4 CONV PEDESTRIAN USING A PEDESTRIAN CONVEYA 4 U-TURN MAKING A U-TURN 5 PTOW PEDESTRIAN TOWING OR TRAILERING AN OB 5 BACK BACKING 6 BIKE PEDALCYCLIST 6 STOP STOPPED IN TRAFFIC 7 BTOW PEDALCYCLIST TOWING OR TRAILERING AN i 7 PRKD-P PARKED - PROPERLY 8 PRKD OCCUPANT OF A PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE 8 PRKD-I PARKED - IMPROPERLY 9 UNK UNKNOWN TYPE OF NON-MOTORIST PEDESTRIAN LOCATION CODE TRANSLATION LIST TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE CODE TRANSLATION LIST CODE LONG DESCRIPTION CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 00 AT INTERSECTION - NOT IN ROADWAY 000 NONE NO CONTROL 01 AT INTERSECTION - INSIDE CROSSWALK 001 TRF SIGNAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS 02 AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY, OUTSIDE CROSSWALK 002 FLASHBCN-R FLASHING BEACON - RED (STOP) 03 AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY, XWALK AVAIL UNKNWN 003 FLASHBCN-A FLASHING BEACON - AMBER (SLOW) 04 NOT AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY 004 STOP SIGN STOP SIGN 05 NOT AT INTERSECTION - ON SHOULDER 005 SLOW SIGN SLOW SIGN 06 NOT AT INTERSECTION - ON MEDIAN 006 REG-SIGN REGULATORY SIGN 07 NOT AT INTERSECTION - WITHIN TRAFFIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 007 YIELD YIELD SIGN 08 NOT AT INTERSECTION - IN BIKE PATH 008 WARNING WARNING SIGN 09 NOT-AT INTERSECTION - ON SIDEWALK 009 CURVE CURVE SIGN 10 OUTSIDE TRAFFICWAY BOUNDARIES 010 SCHL X-ING SCHOOL CROSSING SIGN OR SPECIAL SIGNAL 15 NOT AT INTERSECTION - INSIDE MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK 011 OFCR/FLAG POLICE OFFICER, FLAGMAN - SCHOOL PATROL 18 OTHER, NOT IN ROADWAY 012 BRDG-GATE BRIDGE GATE - BARRIER 99 UNKNOWN LOCATION 013 TEMP-BARR TEMPORARY BARRIER 014 NO-PASS-ZN NO PASSING ZONE 015 ONE-WAY ONE-WAY STREET 016 CHANNEL CHANNELIZATION 017 MEDIAN BAR MEDIAN BARRIER 018 PILOT CAR PILOT CAR ROAD CHARACTER CODE TRANSLATION LIST 019 SP PED SIG SPECIAL PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL 020 X-BUCK CROSSBUCK SHORT 021 THR-GN-SIG THROUGH GREEN ARROW OR SIGNAL CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 022 L-GRN-SIG LEFT TURN GREEN ARROW, LANE MARKINGS, OR SIGNAL 0 UNK UNKNOWN 023 R-GRN-SIG RIGHT TURN GREEN ARROW, LANE MARKINGS, OR SIGNAL 1 INTER INTERSECTION 024 WIGWAG WIGWAG OR FLASHING LIGHTS W/O DROP-ARM GATE 2 ALLEY DRIVEWAY OR ALLEY 025 X-BUCK WRN CROSSBUCK AND ADVANCE WARNING 026 WW W/ GATE FLASHING LIGHTS WITH DROP-ARM GATES 3 STRGHT STRAIGHT ROADWAY 027 OVRHD SGNL SUPPLEMENTAL OVERHEAD SIGNAL (RR XING ONLY) 4 TRANS TRANSITION 028 SP RR STOP SPECIAL RR STOP SIGN 5 CURVE CURVE (HORIZONTAL CURVE) 029 ILUM GRD X ILLUMINATED GRADE CROSSING 6 OPENAC OPEN ACCESS OR TURNOUT 037 RAMP METER METERED RAMPS 7 GRADE GRADE (VERTICAL CURVE) 038 RUMBLE STR RUMBLE STRIP 8 BRIDGE BRIDGE STRUCTURE 090 L-TURN REF LEFT TURN REFUGE (WHEN REFUGE IS INVOLVED) 9 TUNNEL TUNNEL 091 R-TURN ALL RIGHT TURN AT ALL TIMES SIGN, ETC. 092 EMR SGN/FL EMERGENCY SIGNS OR FLARES 093 ACCEL LANE ACCELERATION OR DECELERATION LANES 094 R-TURN PRO RIGHT TURN PROHIBITED ON RED AFTER STOPPING 095 BUS STPSGN BUS STOP SIGN AND RED LIGHTS 099 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN OR NOT DEFINITE VEHICLE TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST WEATHER CONDITION CODE TRANSLATION LIST CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 01 PSNGR CAR PASSENGER CAR, PICKUP, ETC. 0 UNK UNKNOWN 02 BOBTAIL TRUCK TRACTOR WITH NO TRAILERS (BOBTAIL) 1 CLR CLEAR 03 FARM TRCTR FARM TRACTOR OR SELF-PROPELLED FARM EQUIPMENT 2 CLD CLOUDY 04 SEMI TOW TRUCK TRACTOR WITH TRAILER/MOBILE HOME IN TOW 3 RAIN RAIN 05 TRUCK TRUCK WITH NON-DETACHABLE BED, PANEL, ETC. 4 SLT SLEET 06 MOPED MOPED, MINIBIKE, MOTOR SCOOTER, OR MOTOR BICYCLE 5 FOG FOG 07 SCHL BUS SCHOOL BUS (INCLUDES VAN) 6 SNOW SNOW 08 0TH BUS OTHER BUS 7 DUST DUST 09 MTRCYCLE MOTORCYCLE 8 SMOK SMOKE 10 OTHER OTHER: FORKLIFT, BACKHOE, ETC. 9 ASH ASH 11 MOTRHOME MOTORHOME 12 TROLLEY MOTORIZED STREET CAR/TROLLEY (NO RAILS/WIRES) 13 ATV ATV 14 MTRSCTR MOTORIZED SCOOTER 15 SNOWMOBILE SNOWMOBILE 99 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN VEHICLE TYPE CDS150 07/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION-CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE OR 99W(Hwy 091)@ SW 72nd Avenue January 1,2007 through December 31,2011 NON- PROPERTY INTER- FATAL FATAL DAMAGE TOTAL PEOPLE PEOPLE DRY WET INTER- SECTION OFF- COLLISION TYPE CRASHES CRASHES ONLY CRASHES KILLED INJURED TRUCKS SURF SURF DAY DARK SECTION RELATED ROAD YEAR: 2011 ANGLE 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 PEDESTRIAN 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 REAR-END 0 3 2 5 0 5 1 2 2 5 0 5 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 2011 TOTAL 0 5 4 9 0 8 1 4 4 6 3 9 0 0 YEAR: 2010 ANGLE 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 REAR-END 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2010 TOTAL 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 YEAR: 2009 PEDESTRIAN 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 REAR-END 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 2 2 4 0 7 0 3 1 3 1 4 0 0 2009 TOTAL 0 6 2 8 0 12 1 6 1 7 1 8 0 0 YEAR: 2008 ANGLE 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 REAR-END 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 1 3 4 0 1 0 3 1 3 1 4 0 0 2008 TOTAL 0 3 3 6 0 6 0 5 1 5 1 6 0 1 YEAR: 2007 REAR-END 0 3 1 4 0 8 0 2 2 2 2 4 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 2 2 4 0 2 0 1 3 3 1 4 0 0 2007 TOTAL 0 5 3 8 0 10 0 3 5 5 3 8 0 0 FINAL TOTAL 0 21 12 33 0 38 3 18 12 24 8 33 0 1 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes are reported for the 2011 data file compared to previous years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ SW 72nd Avenue January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 00529 Y NNN N 01/24/2007 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR BIKE 110 04,01 CITY Wed TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W N TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN 4P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 06 0 Y DAY INJ STRGHT 01 BIKE INJA 22 M 020,047 000 04,01 NE SW 01 NONE TURN-L PRVTE SW N 019 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 29 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 06261 NNNNN 12/04/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR PED 01 NONE 1 TURN-L 02 CITY Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY PED PRVTE NW NE 018 00 8A PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 05 0 N DAY INJ SEMI TOW 01 DRVR NONE 59 M OR-Y 029 026 02 OR>25 STRGHT 01 PED INJC 57 F 01 000 035 00 SE NW 06814 NYNNN 12/02/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR PED 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02 CITY Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY PED PRVTE NW NE 018 00 7P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 05 0 Y DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 55 M OR-Y 029 000 02 OR<25 STRGHT 01 PED INJB 53 M 01 000 000 00 NW SE 86707 Y N N 06/11/2007 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 01 NONE Mon TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE NE SW 001 00 8A PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 F OR-Y 047,026 000 01 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 34 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR>25 02 PSNG INJC 36 F 000 000 00 04465 N N N 08/04/2007 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 27 NO RPT Sat TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 10A PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 19 M OR-Y 016,026 038 27 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 79 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 07080 N N N 11/16/2007 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NO RPT Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 4P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 06 0 N DUSK INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 41 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 2 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ SW 72nd Avenue January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 36 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 12 F 000 000 00 03 PSNG INJC 11 F 000 000 00 04 PSNG INJC 11 M 000 000 00 05 PSNG INJC 12 F 000 000 00 03729 N N N 07/13/2008 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N Y CLR PRKD MV 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 040,013 12 CITY Sun TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY ANGL PRVTE SW NE 000 040 00 11A PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 06 0 Y DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJA 20 M OR-Y 080,081 028 12 OR<25 02 NONE 0 PRKD-P PRVTE NW SE 009 013 00 MOTRHOME 03 NONE 0 PRKD-P PRVTE NW SE 009 00 PSNGR CAR 03587 N N N 07/23/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 07 NO RPT Thu TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 2P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 25 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 30 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03 UNKN 9 STOP PRVTE NE SW 022 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 26 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR>25 04930 N N N 10/02/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N UNK S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N UNK REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 5P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 38 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 06278 N N N 12/07/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 10 NO RPT Mon TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 12P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 88 M OR-Y 014,026 000 10 OR<25 CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 3 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ SW 72nd Avenue January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 21 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 19 M 000 000 00 03 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 022 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 58 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 01866 N N N 04/10/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE Sun TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 12P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 35 M OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 PSNG NO<5 03 F 000 000 00 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 37 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02142 NNNNN 04/26/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 10 NO RPT Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 10A PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 32 M OR-Y 014,026 088 10 OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 55 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 06128 NNNNN 11/03/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY Thu TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE L-GRN-SIG N WET REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 8A PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 06 1 N DAY INJ TRUCK 01 DRVR NONE 35 M OR-Y 043,026 000 07 OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 012 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 43 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 01 M 000 000 00 03 PSNG INJC 13 M 000 000 00 01359 N N N 03/07/2007 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 27 NONE Wed TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 7P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 06 0 N DUSK INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 57 F OR-Y 016,026 038 27 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 29 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 4 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ SW 72nd Avenue January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 05656 N N N 10/22/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N UNK S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 27,07 NONE Fri TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N UNK REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 6P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 06 0 N UNK INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 17 M OR-Y 016,026 000 27,07 OR-? 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 21 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 01383 N N N 03/14/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 UNKN 9 STRGHT 07 NONE Mon TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SW TRF SIGNAL N UNK REAR UNKN SW NE 000 00 7A PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 026 000 07 UNK 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 21 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR>25 07537 N N N 12/03/2007 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN 0-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02 NO RPT Mon TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N WET TURN PRVTE S SW 000 00 6P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 01 0 Y DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 19 F OR-Y 004,028 000 02 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N S 018 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 53 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03744 N N N 07/12/2008 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 UNKN 9 TURN-R 02 NONE Sat TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN UNKN N SW 018 00 8P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 01 0 Y DAY PDO UNKNOWN 01 DRVR NONE 00 U UNK 028 000 02 UNK 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE NE SW 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 04101 NNNNN 08/04/2008 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR BIKE 01 NONE 0 TURN-R 02 CITY Mon TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE NE NW 019 00 5P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 01 0 Y DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 F OR-Y 027 000 02 OR<25 STRGHT 01 BIKE INJC 50 M 03 000 035 00 NE SW 02131 N N N 04/19/2008 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02,13 NONE Sat TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE NE SW 000 00 12P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 02 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 79 M OR-Y 045 000 13 OR<25 CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 5 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ SW 72nd Avenue January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 02 NONE 0 TURN-R PRVTE S NE 016 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 28 M OR-Y 028 000 02 OR<25 04577 N N N 09/14/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 14 NONE Mon TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE NE SW 000 00 4P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 02 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 41 F OR-Y 003 000 14 OR<25 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE NE S 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 000 000 00 UNK 81739 N N N 11/01/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-OTHER 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 004 07 NONE Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N WET TURN UNKN NW NE 018 00 7P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 02 0 Y DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK 026 000 07 UNK 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE NW NE 013 004 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 63 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 06168 N N N 11/10/2008 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN 0-1TURN 01 UNKN 9 TURN-L 02 NO RPT Mon TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N WET TURN PRVTE S SW 000 00 6P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 03 0 Y DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 19 F OR-Y 004,028 000 02 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N S 018 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 39 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 06326 NNNNN 12/10/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR 0-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02,14 CITY Thu TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE SE SW 000 00 9A PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 03 0 Y DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 28 M OR-Y 004,028 000 02,14 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 49 F 000 000 00 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE NW SE 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJA 51 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 06525 N N N 12/20/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02,08 NONE Sun TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N WET TURN PRVTE N S 018 00 4P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 03 0 Y DUSK PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 30 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 6 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ SW 72nd Avenue January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 02 NONE 0 TURN-R PRVTE SW S 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 61 M OR-Y 028 000 02,08 OR<25 01796 YNNNN 04/13/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLD ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 2 STRGHT 062 04,01 CITY Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N WET ANGL PRVTE NE SW 001 00 9A PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 03 0 Y DAY INJ SEMI TOW 01 DRVR NONE 32 M OTH-Y 020,047 000 04,01 N-RES 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N S 018 062 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJA 32 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02882 NNNNN 06/01/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLD 0-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02 CITY Wed TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE S SW 000 00 5P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 03 0 Y DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 24 F OTH-Y 004,028 000 02 N-RES 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N S 018 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 67 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02444 N N N 05/02/2007 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR O-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02 NO RPT Wed TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N WET TURN PRVTE N NE 018 00 2P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 04 0 Y DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 18 F OR-Y 004,028 000 02 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S N 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 67 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 04812 NNNNN 09/28/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 04 CITY Mon TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE SW NW 019 00 7A PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 04 0 Y DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 32 F OR-Y 020 000 04 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE NW SE 018 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 26 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 34 M 000 000 00 03 PSNG INJC 40 F 000 000 00 06756 NNNNN 11/29/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 3-LEG N N CLD ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 04 CITY Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N WET ANGL PRVTE NW SE 018 00 4P PORTLAND UA 8.02 SW 72ND AVE 04 0 Y DUSK INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 18 M OR-Y 020,016 038 04,27 OR<25 CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 7 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ SW 72nd Avenue January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE SW NE 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 40 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 05657 N N N 10/13/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE Thu TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 10A PORTLAND UA 8.37 SW 72ND AVE 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 74 M OTH-Y 000 000 00 N-RES CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ SW 72nd Avenue January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW INT-TYP SPCL USE E AUCO DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFF-RD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST DCSLK TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 80806 Y N N 01/16/2007 16 SW PACIFIC HY 99W INTER 3-LEG N N CLR 0-1TURN 01 UNKN 0 TURN-R 124 01 NO RPT Tue 0 SW 72ND AVE S TRF SIGNAL N ICE TURN UNKN SW S 000 124 00 11A 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 047,080 000 01 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S N 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 41 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03882 N N N 07/21/2008 16 SW PACIFIC HY 99W INTER 3-LEG N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 07 NO RPT Mon 0 SW 72ND AVE S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S N 000 00 5P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 19 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S N 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 24 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 24 F 000 000 00 03 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S N 022 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 51 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 31 F 000 000 00 ACTION CODE TRANSLATION LIST ACTION SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 000 NONE NO ACTION OR NON-WARRANTED 001 SKIDDED SKIDDED 002 ON/OFF V GETTING ON OR OFF STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE 003 LOAD OVR OVERHANGING LOAD STRUCK ANOTHER VEHICLE, ETC. 006 SLOW DN SLOWED DOWN 007 AVOIDING AVOIDING MANEUVER 008 PAR PARK PARALLEL PARKING 009 ANG PARK ANGLE PARKING 010 INTERFERE PASSENGER INTERFERING WITH DRIVER 011 STOPPED STOPPED IN TRAFFIC NOT WAITING TO MAKE A LEFT TURN 012 STP/L TRN STOPPED BECAUSE OF LEFT TURN SIGNAL OR WAITING, ETC. 013 STP TURN STOPPED WHILE EXECUTING A TURN 015 GO A/STOP PROCEED AFTER STOPPING FOR A STOP SIGN/FLASHING RED. 016 TRN A/RED TURNED ON RED AFTER STOPPING 017 LOSTCTRL LOST CONTROL OF VEHICLE 018 EXIT DWY ENTERING STREET OR HIGHWAY FROM ALLEY OR DRIVEWAY 019 ENTR DWY ENTERING ALLEY OR DRIVEWAY FROM STREET OR HIGHWAY 020 STR ENTR BEFORE ENTERING ROADWAY, STRUCK PEDESTRIAN, ETC. ON SIDEWALK OR SHOULDER 021 NO DRVR CAR RAN AWAY - NO DRIVER 022 PREV COL STRUCK, OR WAS STRUCK BY, VEHICLE OR PEDESTRIAN IN PRIOR COLLISION BEFORE ACC. STABILIZED 023 STALLED VEHICLE STALLED 024 DRVR DEAD DEAD BY UNASSOCIATED CAUSE 025 FATIGUE FATIGUED, SLEEPY, ASLEEP 026 SUN DRIVER BLINDED BY SUN 027 HDLGHTS DRIVER BLINDED BY HEADLIGHTS 028 ILLNESS PHYSICALLY ILL 029 THRU MED VEHICLE CROSSED, PLUNGED OVER, OR THROUGH MEDIAN BARRIER 030 PURSUIT PURSUING OR ATTEMPTING TO STOP ANOTHER VEHICLE 031 PASSING PASSING SITUATION 032 PRKOFFRD VEHICLE PARKED BEYOND CURB OR SHOULDER 033 CROS MED VEHICLE CROSSED EARTH OR GRASS MEDIAN 034 X N/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - NO TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 035 X W/ SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 036 DIAGONAL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - DIAGONALLY 037 BTWN INT CROSSING BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS 038 DISTRACT DRIVER'S ATTENTION DISTRACTED 039 W/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER WITH TRAFFIC 040 A/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER FACING TRAFFIC 041 W/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT WITH TRAFFIC 042 A/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT FACING TRAFFIC 043 PLAYINRD PLAYING IN STREET OR ROAD 044 PUSH MV PUSHING OR WORKING ON VEHICLE IN ROAD OR ON SHOULDER 045 WORK ON WORKING IN ROADWAY OR ALONG SHOULDER 050 LAY ON RD STANDING OR LYING IN ROADWAY 051 ENT OFFRD ENTERING / STARTING IN TRAFFIC LANE FROM OFF-ROAD 088 OTHER OTHER ACTION 099 UNK UNKNOWN ACTION CAUSE CODE TRANSLATION LIST COLLISION TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST CAUSE SHORT COLL SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 00 NO CODE NO CAUSE ASSOCIATED AT THIS LEVEL & 0TH MISCELLANEOUS 01 TOO-FAST TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS (NOT EXCEED POSTED SPEED - BACK BACKING 02 NO-YIELD DID NOT YIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 PED PEDESTRIAN 03 PAS-STOP PASSED STOP SIGN OR RED FLASHER 1 ANGL ANGLE 04 DIS--RAG DISREGARDED R-A-G TRAFFIC SIGNAL. 2 HEAD HEAD-ON 05 LEFT-CTR DROVE LEFT OF CENTER ON TWO-WAY ROAD 3 REAR REAR-END 06 IMP-OVER IMPROPER OVERTAKING 4 SS-M SIDESWIPE - MEETING 07 TOO-CLOS FOLLOWED TOO CLOSELY 5 SS-0 SIDESWIPE - OVERTAKING 08 IMP-TURN MADE IMPROPER TURN 6 TURN TURNING MOVEMENT 09 DRINKING ALCOHOL OR DRUG INVOLVED 7 PARK PARKING MANEUVER 10 OTHR-IMP OTHER IMPROPER DRIVING 8 NCOL NON-COLLISION 11 MECH-DEF MECHANICAL DEFECT 9 FIX FIXED OBJECT OR OTHER OBJECT 12 OTHER OTHER (NOT IMPROPER DRIVING) 13 IMP LN C IMPROPER CHANGE OF TRAFFIC LANES 14 DIS TCD DISREGARDED OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE 15 WRNG WAY WRONG WAY ON ONE-WAY ROADWAY 16 FATIGUE DRIVER DROWSY/FATIGUED/SLEEPY 18 IN RDWY NON-MOTORIST ILLEGALLY IN ROADWAY 19 NT VISBL NON-MOTORIST CLOTHING NOT VISIBLE 20 IMP PKNG VEHICLE IMPROPERLY PARKED 21 DEF STER DEFECTIVE STEERING MECHANISM CRASH TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST 22 DEF BRKE INADEQUATE OR NO BRAKES 24 LOADSHFT VEHICLE LOST LOAD OR LOAD SHIFTED CRASH SHORT 25 TIREFAIL TIRE FAILURE TYPE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 26 PHANTOM PHANTOM / NON-CONTACT VEHICLE & OVERTURN OVERTURNED 27 INATTENT INATTENTION 0 NON-COLL OTHER NON-COLLISION 30 SPEED DRIVING IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED 1 0TH RDWY MOTOR VEHICLE ON OTHER ROADWAY 31 RACING SPEED RACING (PER PAR) 2 PRKD MV PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE 32 CARELESS CARELESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 3 PED PEDESTRIAN 33 RECKLESS RECKLESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 4 TRAIN RAILWAY TRAIN 34 AGGRESV AGGRESSIVE DRIVING (PER PAR) 6 BIKE PEDALCYCLIST 35 RD RAGE ROAD RAGE (PER PAR) 7 ANIMAL ANIMAL 8 FIX OBJ FIXED OBJECT 9 OTH OBJ OTHER OBJECT A ANGL-STP ENTERING AT ANGLE - ONE VEHICLE STOPPED B ANGL-OTH ENTERING AT ANGLE - ALL OTHERS C S-STRGHT FROM SAME DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT D S-1TURN FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT E S-1STOP FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED F S-OTHER FROM SAME DIRECTION-ALL OTHERS, INCLUDING PARKING G O-STRGHT FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT H 0-1TURN FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT I 0-1STOP FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED J 0-OTHER FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION-ALL OTHERS INCL. PARKING DRIVER LICENSE CODE TRANSLATION LIST DRIVER RESIDENCE CODE TRANSLATION LIST LIC SHORT RES SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 0 NONE NOT LICENSED (HAD NEVER BEEN LICENSED) 1 OR<25 OREGON RESIDENT WITHIN 25 MILE OF HOME 1 OR-Y VALID OREGON LICENSE 2 OR>25 OREGON RESIDENT 25 OR MORE MILES FROM HOME 2 OTH-Y VALID LICENSE, OTHER STATE OR COUNTRY 3 OR-? OREGON RESIDENT - UNKNOWN DISTANCE FROM HOME 4 N-RES NON-RESIDENT 3 SUSP SUSPENDED/REVOKED 9 UNK UNKNOWN IF OREGON RESIDENT ERROR CODE TRANSLATION LIST ERROR SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION 000 NONE NO ERROR 001 WIDE TRN WIDE TURN 002 CUT CORN CUT CORNER ON TURN 003 FAIL TRN FAILED TO OBEY MANDATORY TRAFFIC TURN SIGNAL, SIGN OR LANE MARKINGS 004 L IN TRF LEFT TURN IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC 005 L PROHIB LEFT TURN WHERE PROHIBITED 006 FRM WRNG TURNED FROM WRONG LANE 007 TO WRONG TURNED INTO WRONG LANE 008 ILLEG U U-TURNED ILLEGALLY 009 IMP STOP IMPROPERLY STOPPED IN TRAFFIC LANE 010 IMP SIG IMPROPER SIGNAL OR FAILURE TO SIGNAL 011 IMP BACK BACKING IMPROPERLY (NOT PARKING) 012 IMP PARK IMPROPERLY PARKED 013 UNPARK IMPROPER START LEAVING PARKED POSITION 014 IMP STRT IMPROPER START FROM STOPPED POSITION 015 IMP LGHT IMPROPER OR NO LIGHTS (VEHICLE IN TRAFFIC) 016 INATTENT FAILED TO DIM LIGHTS (UNTIL 4/1/97) / INATTENTION (AFTER 4/1/97) 017 UNSF VEH DRIVING UNSAFE VEHICLE (NO OTHER ERROR APPARENT) 018 OTH PARK ENTERING/EXITING PARKED POSITION W/ INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE; OTHER IMPROPER PARKING MANEUVER 019 DIS DRIV DISREGARDED OTHER DRIVER'S SIGNAL 020 DIS SGNL DISREGARDED TRAFFIC SIGNAL 021 RAN STOP DISREGARDED STOP SIGN OR FLASHING RED 022 DIS SIGN DISREGARDED WARNING SIGN, FLARES OR FLASHING AMBER 023 DIS OFCR DISREGARDED POLICE OFFICER OR FLAGMAN 024 DIS EMER DISREGARDED SIREN OR WARNING OF EMERGENCY VEHICLE 025 DIS RR DISREGARDED RR SIGNAL, RR SIGN, OR RR FLAGMAN 026 REAR-END FAILED TO AVOID STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE AHEAD OTHER THAN SCHOOL BUS 027 BIKE ROW DID NOT HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY OVER PEDALCYCLIST 028 NO ROW DID NOT HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY 029 PED ROW FAILED TO YIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO PEDESTRIAN 030 PAS CURV PASSING ON A CURVE 031 PAS WRNG PASSING ON THE WRONG SIDE 032 PAS TANG PASSING ON STRAIGHT ROAD UNDER UNSAFE CONDITIONS 033 PAS X-WK PASSED VEHICLE STOPPED AT CROSSWALK FOR PEDESTRIAN 034 PAS INTR PASSING AT INTERSECTION 035 PAS HILL PASSING ON CREST OF HILL 036 N/PAS ZN PASSING IN "NO PASSING" ZONE 037 PAS TRAF PASSING IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC 038 CUT-IN CUTTING IN (TWO LANES - TWO WAY ONLY) 039 WRNGSIDE DRIVING ON WRONG SIDE OF THE ROAD 040 THRU MED DRIVING THROUGH SAFETY ZONE OR OVER ISLAND 041 F/ST BUS FAILED TO STOP FOR SCHOOL BUS ERROR CODE TRANSLATION LIST ERROR SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION 042 F/SLO MV FAILED TO DECREASE SPEED FOR SLOWER MOVING VEHICLE 043 TO CLOSE FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY (MUST BE ON OFFICER'S REPORT) 044 STRDL LN STRADDLING OR DRIVING ON WRONG LANES 045 IMP CHG IMPROPER CHANGE OF TRAFFIC LANES 046 WRNG WAY WRONG WAY ON ONE-WAY ROADWAY (DELIBERATELY TRAVELING ON WRONG SIDE) 047 BASCRULE DRIVING TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS (NOT EXCEEDING POSTED SPEED) 048 OPN DOOR OPENED DOOR INTO ADJACENT TRAFFIC LANE 049 IMPEDING IMPEDING TRAFFIC 050 SPEED DRIVING IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED 051 RECKLESS RECKLESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 052 CARELESS CARELESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 053 RACING SPEED RACING (PER PAR) 054 X N/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION, NO TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 055 X W/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION, TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 056 DIAGONAL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - DIAGONALLY 057 BTWN INT CROSSING BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS 059 W/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER WITH TRAFFIC 060 A/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER FACING TRAFFIC 061 W/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT WITH TRAFFIC 062 A/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT FACING TRAFFIC 063 PLAYINRD PLAYING IN STREET OR ROAD 064 PUSH MV PUSHING OR WORKING ON VEHICLE IN ROAD OR ON SHOULDER 065 WK IN RD WORKING IN ROADWAY OR ALONG SHOULDER 070 LAYON RD STANDING OR LYING IN ROADWAY 073 ELUDING ELUDING 080 FAIL LN FAILED TO MAINTAIN LANE 081 OFF RD RAN OFF ROAD 082 NO CLEAR DRIVER MISJUDGED CLEARANCE 083 OVRSTEER OVERCORRECTING 084 NOT USED CODE NOT IN USE 085 OVRLOAD OVERLOADING OR IMPROPER LOADING OF VEHICLE WITH CARGO OR PASSENGERS 097 UNA DIS TC UNABLE TO DETERMINE WHICH DRIVER DISREGARDED TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE EVENT CODE TRANSLATION LIST EVENT SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 001 FEL/JUMP OCCUPANT FELL, JUMPED OR WAS EJECTED FROM MOVING VEHICLE 002 INTERFER PASSENGER INTERFERED WITH DRIVER 003 BUG INTF ANIMAL OR INSECT IN VEHICLE INTERFERED WITH DRIVER 004 PED INV PEDESTRIAN INVOLVED (NON-PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENT) 005 SUB-PED "SUB-PED": PEDESTRIAN INJURED SUBSEQUENT TO COLLISION, ETC. 006 BIKE INV TRICYCLE-BICYCLE INVOLVED 007 HITCHIKR HITCHHIKER (SOLICITING A RIDE) 008 PSNGR TOW PASSENGER BEING TOWED OR PUSHED ON CONVEYANCE 009 ON/OFF V GETTING ON OR OFF STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE (OCCUPANTS ONLY) 010 SUB OTRN OVERTURNED AFTER FIRST HARMFUL EVENT 011 MV PUSHD VEHICLE BEING PUSHED 012 MV TOWED VEHICLE TOWED OR HAD BEEN TOWING ANOTHER VEHICLE 013 FORCED VEHICLE FORCED BY IMPACT INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE, PEDALCYCLIST OR PEDESTRIAN 014 SET MOTN VEHICLE SET IN MOTION BY NON-DRIVER (CHILD RELEASED BRAKES, ETC.) 015 RR ROW AT OR ON RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY (NOT LIGHT RAIL) 016 LT RL ROW AT OR ON LIGHT-RAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY 017 RR HIT V TRAIN STRUCK VEHICLE 018 V HIT RR VEHICLE STRUCK TRAIN 019 HIT RR CAR VEHICLE STRUCK RAILROAD CAR ON ROADWAY 020 JACKNIFE JACKKNIFE; TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE STRUCK TOWING VEHICLE 021 TRL OTRN TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE OVERTURNED 022 CN BROKE TRAILER CONNECTION BROKE 023 DETACH TRL DETACHED TRAILING OBJECT STRUCK OTHER VEHICLE, NON-MOTORIST, OR OBJECT 024 V DOOR OPN VEHICLE DOOR OPENED INTO ADJACENT TRAFFIC LANE 025 WHEELOFF WHEEL CAME OFF 026 HOOD UP HOOD FLEW UP 028 LOAD SHIFT LOST LOAD, LOAD MOVED OR SHIFTED 029 TIREFAIL TIRE FAILURE 030 PET PET: CAT, DOG AND SIMILAR 031 LVSTOCK STOCK: COW, CALF, BULL, STEER, SHEEP, ETC. 032 HORSE HORSE, MULE, OR DONKEY 033 HRSE&RID HORSE AND RIDER 034 GAME WILD ANIMAL, GAME (INCLUDES BIRDS; NOT DEER OR ELK) 035 DEER ELK DEER OR ELK, WAPITI 036 ANML VEH ANIMAL-DRAWN VEHICLE 037 CULVERT CULVERT, OPEN LOW OR HIGH MANHOLE 038 ATENUATN IMPACT ATTENUATOR 039 PK METER PARKING METER 040 CURB CURB (ALSO NARROW SIDEWALKS ON BRIDGES) 041 JIGGLE JIGGLE BARS OR TRAFFIC SNAKE FOR CHANNELIZATION 042 GDRL END LEADING EDGE OF GUARDRAIL 043 GARDRAIL GUARD RAIL (NOT METAL MEDIAN BARRIER) 044 BARRIER MEDIAN BARRIER (RAISED OR METAL) 045 WALL RETAINING WALL OR TUNNEL WALL 046 BR RAIL BRIDGE RAILING (ON BRIDGE AND APPROACH) 047 BR ABUT BRIDGE ABUTMENT (APPROACH ENDS) 048 BR COLMN BRIDGE PILLAR OR COLUMN (EVEN THOUGH STRUCK PROTECTIVE GUARD RAIL FIRST) 049 BR GIRDR BRIDGE GIRDER (HORIZONTAL STRUCTURE OVERHEAD) 050 ISLAND TRAFFIC RAISED ISLAND 051 GORE GORE 052 POLE UNK POLE - TYPE UNKNOWN 053 POLE UTL POLE - POWER OR TELEPHONE 054 ST LIGHT POLE - STREET LIGHT ONLY 055 TRF SGNL POLE - TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND PED SIGNAL ONLY 056 SGN BRDG POLE - SIGN BRIDGE 057 STOPSIGN STOP OR YIELD SIGN 058 0TH SIGN OTHER SIGN, INCLUDING STREET SIGNS 059 HYDRANT HYDRANT EVENT CODE TRANSLATION LIST EVENT SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 060 MARKER DELINEATOR OR MARKER (REFLECTOR POSTS) 061 MAILBOX MAILBOX 062 TREE TREE, STUMP OR SHRUBS 063 VEG OHED TREE BRANCH OR OTHER VEGETATION OVERHEAD, ETC. 064 WIRE/CBL WIRE OR CABLE ACROSS OR OVER THE ROAD 065 TEMP SGN TEMPORARY SIGN OR BARRICADE IN ROAD, ETC. 066 PERM SGN PERMANENT SIGN OR BARRICADE IN/OFF ROAD 067 SLIDE SLIDES, FALLEN OR FALLING ROCKS 068 FRGN OBJ FOREIGN OBSTRUCTION/DEBRIS IN ROAD (NOT GRAVEL) 069 EQP WORK EQUIPMENT WORKING IN/OFF ROAD 070 0TH EQP OTHER EQUIPMENT IN OR OFF ROAD (INCLUDES PARKED TRAILER, BOAT) 071 MAIN EQP WRECKER, STREET SWEEPER, SNOW PLOW OR SANDING EQUIPMENT 072 OTHER WALL ROCK, BRICK OR OTHER SOLID WALL 073 IRRGL PVMT SPEED BUMP, OTHER BUMP, POTHOLE OR PAVEMENT IRREGULARITY (PER PAR) 075 CAVE IN BRIDGE OR ROAD CAVE IN 076 HI WATER HIGH WATER 077 SNO BANK SNOW BANK 078 HOLE CHUCKHOLE IN ROAD, LOW OR HIGH SHOULDER AT PAVEMENT EDGE 079 DITCH CUT SLOPE OR DITCH EMBANKMENT 080 OBJ F MV STRUCK BY ROCK OR OTHER OBJECT SET IN MOTION BY OTHER VEHICLE (INCL. LOST LOADS) 081 FLY-OBJ STRUCK BY OTHER MOVING OR FLYING OBJECT 082 VEH HID VEHICLE OBSCURED VIEW 083 VEG HID VEGETATION OBSCURED VIEW 084 BLDG HID VIEW OBSCURED BY FENCE, SIGN, PHONE BOOTH, ETC. 085 WIND GUST WIND GUST 086 IMMERSED VEHICLE IMMERSED IN BODY OF WATER 087 FIRE/EXP FIRE OR EXPLOSION 088 FENC/BLD FENCE OR BUILDING, ETC. 089 OTH ACDT ACCIDENT RELATED TO ANOTHER SEPARATE ACCIDENT 090 TO 1 SIDE TWO-WAY TRAFFIC ON DIVIDED ROADWAY ALL ROUTED TO ONE SIDE 092 PHANTOM OTHER (PHANTOM) NON-CONTACT VEHICLE (ON PAR OR REPORT) 093 CELL-POL CELL PHONE (ON PAR OR DRIVER IN USE) 094 VIOL GDL TEENAGE DRIVER IN VIOLATION OF GRADUATED LICENSE PGM 095 GUY WIRE GUY WIRE 096 BERM BERM (EARTHEN OR GRAVEL MOUND) 097 GRAVEL GRAVEL IN ROADWAY 098 ABR EDGE ABRUPT EDGE 099 CELL-WTN CELL PHONE USE WITNESSED BY OTHER PARTICIPANT 100 UNK FIXD UNKNOWN TYPE OF FIXED OBJECT 101 OTHER OBJ OTHER OR UNKNOWN OBJECT, NOT FIXED 104 OUTSIDE V PASSENGER RIDING ON VEHICLE EXTERIOR 105 PEDAL PSGR PASSENGER RIDING ON PEDALCYCLE 106 MAN WHLCHR PEDESTRIAN IN NON-MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR 107 MTR WHLCHR PEDESTRIAN IN MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR 110 N-MTR NON-MOTORIST STRUCK VEHICLE 111 S CAR VS V STREET CAR/TROLLEY (ON RAILS AND/OR OVERHEAD WIRE SYSTEM) STRUCK VEHICLE 112 V VS S CAR VEHICLE STRUCK STREET CAR/TROLLEY (ON RAILS AND/OR OVERHEAD WIRE SYSTEM) 113 S CAR ROW AT OR ON STREET CAR/TROLLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY 114 RR EQUIP VEHICLE STRUCK RAILROAD EQUIPMENT (NOT TRAIN) ON TRACKS 120 WIRE BAR WIRE OR CABLE MEDIAN BARRIER 124 SLIPPERY SLIDING OR SWERVING DUE TO WET, ICY, SLIPPERY OR LOOSE SURFACE 125 SHLDR SHOULDER GAVE WAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION TRANSLATION LIST HIGHWAY COMPONENT TRANSLATION LIST FUNC CLASS DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION 01 RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE 0 MAINLINE STATE HIGHWAY 02 RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER 1 COUPLET 06 RURAL MINOR ARTERIAL 3 FRONTAGE ROAD 07 RURAL MAJOR COLLECTOR 6 CONNECTION 8 HIGHWAY - OTHER 08 RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR 09 RURAL LOCAL 11 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE 12 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER FREEWAYS AND EXP 14 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER 16 URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL 17 URBAN COLLECTOR 19 URBAN LOCAL 78 UNKNOWN RURAL SYSTEM 79 UNKNOWN RURAL NON-SYSTEM 98 UNKNOWN URBAN SYSTEM 99 UNKNOWN URBAN NON-SYSTEM INJURY SEVERITY CODE TRANSLATION LIST LIGHT CONDITION CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 1 KILL FATAL INJURY 0 UNK UNKNOWN 2 INJA INCAPACITATING INJURY - BLEEDING, BROKEN BONES 1 DAY DAYLIGHT 3 INJB NON-INCAPACITATING INJURY 2 DLIT DARKNESS - WITH STREET LIGHTS 4 INJC POSSIBLE INJURY - COMPLAINT OF PAIN 3 DARK DARKNESS - NO STREET LIGHTS 5 PRI DIED PRIOR TO CRASH 4 DAWN DAWN (TWILIGHT) 7 NO<5 NO INJURY - 0 TO 4 YEARS OF AGE 5 DUSK DUSK (TWILIGHT) MEDIAN TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST MILEAGE TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE LONG DESCRIPTION 0 NONE NO MEDIAN 0 REGULAR MILEAGE 1 RSDMD SOLID MEDIAN BARRIER T TEMPORARY 2 DIVMD EARTH, GRASS OR PAVED MEDIAN Y SPUR Z OVERLAPPING MOVEMENT TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST PARTICIPANT TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 0 UNK UNKNOWN 0 OCC UNKNOWN OCCUPANT TYPE 1 STRGHT STRAIGHT AHEAD 1 DRVR DRIVER 2 TURN-R TURNING RIGHT 2 PSNG PASSENGER 3 TURN-L TURNING LEFT 3 PED PEDESTRIAN 4 CONV PEDESTRIAN USING A PEDESTRIAN CONVEYA 4 U-TURN MAKING A U-TURN 5 PTOW PEDESTRIAN TOWING OR TRAILERING AN OB 5 BACK BACKING 6 BIKE PEDALCYCLIST 6 STOP STOPPED IN TRAFFIC 7 BTOW PEDALCYCLIST TOWING OR TRAILERING AN i 7 PRKD-P PARKED - PROPERLY 8 PRKD OCCUPANT OF A PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE 8 PRKD-I PARKED - IMPROPERLY 9 UNK UNKNOWN TYPE OF NON-MOTORIST PEDESTRIAN LOCATION CODE TRANSLATION LIST TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE CODE TRANSLATION LIST CODE LONG DESCRIPTION CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 00 AT INTERSECTION - NOT IN ROADWAY 000 NONE NO CONTROL 01 AT INTERSECTION - INSIDE CROSSWALK 001 TRF SIGNAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS 02 AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY, OUTSIDE CROSSWALK 002 FLASHBCN-R FLASHING BEACON - RED (STOP) 03 AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY, XWALK AVAIL UNKNWN 003 FLASHBCN-A FLASHING BEACON - AMBER (SLOW) 04 NOT AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY 004 STOP SIGN STOP SIGN 05 NOT AT INTERSECTION - ON SHOULDER 005 SLOW SIGN SLOW SIGN 06 NOT AT INTERSECTION - ON MEDIAN 006 REG-SIGN REGULATORY SIGN 07 NOT AT INTERSECTION - WITHIN TRAFFIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 007 YIELD YIELD SIGN 08 NOT AT INTERSECTION - IN BIKE PATH 008 WARNING WARNING SIGN 09 NOT-AT INTERSECTION - ON SIDEWALK 009 CURVE CURVE SIGN 10 OUTSIDE TRAFFICWAY BOUNDARIES 010 SCHL X-ING SCHOOL CROSSING SIGN OR SPECIAL SIGNAL 15 NOT AT INTERSECTION - INSIDE MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK 011 OFCR/FLAG POLICE OFFICER, FLAGMAN - SCHOOL PATROL 18 OTHER, NOT IN ROADWAY 012 BRDG-GATE BRIDGE GATE - BARRIER 99 UNKNOWN LOCATION 013 TEMP-BARR TEMPORARY BARRIER 014 NO-PASS-ZN NO PASSING ZONE 015 ONE-WAY ONE-WAY STREET 016 CHANNEL CHANNELIZATION 017 MEDIAN BAR MEDIAN BARRIER 018 PILOT CAR PILOT CAR ROAD CHARACTER CODE TRANSLATION LIST 019 SP PED SIG SPECIAL PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL 020 X-BUCK CROSSBUCK SHORT 021 THR-GN-SIG THROUGH GREEN ARROW OR SIGNAL CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 022 L-GRN-SIG LEFT TURN GREEN ARROW, LANE MARKINGS, OR SIGNAL 0 UNK UNKNOWN 023 R-GRN-SIG RIGHT TURN GREEN ARROW, LANE MARKINGS, OR SIGNAL 1 INTER INTERSECTION 024 WIGWAG WIGWAG OR FLASHING LIGHTS W/O DROP-ARM GATE 2 ALLEY DRIVEWAY OR ALLEY 025 X-BUCK WRN CROSSBUCK AND ADVANCE WARNING 026 WW W/ GATE FLASHING LIGHTS WITH DROP-ARM GATES 3 STRGHT STRAIGHT ROADWAY 027 OVRHD SGNL SUPPLEMENTAL OVERHEAD SIGNAL (RR XING ONLY) 4 TRANS TRANSITION 028 SP RR STOP SPECIAL RR STOP SIGN 5 CURVE CURVE (HORIZONTAL CURVE) 029 ILUM GRD X ILLUMINATED GRADE CROSSING 6 OPENAC OPEN ACCESS OR TURNOUT 037 RAMP METER METERED RAMPS 7 GRADE GRADE (VERTICAL CURVE) 038 RUMBLE STR RUMBLE STRIP 8 BRIDGE BRIDGE STRUCTURE 090 L-TURN REF LEFT TURN REFUGE (WHEN REFUGE IS INVOLVED) 9 TUNNEL TUNNEL 091 R-TURN ALL RIGHT TURN AT ALL TIMES SIGN, ETC. 092 EMR SGN/FL EMERGENCY SIGNS OR FLARES 093 ACCEL LANE ACCELERATION OR DECELERATION LANES 094 R-TURN PRO RIGHT TURN PROHIBITED ON RED AFTER STOPPING 095 BUS STPSGN BUS STOP SIGN AND RED LIGHTS 099 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN OR NOT DEFINITE VEHICLE TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST WEATHER CONDITION CODE TRANSLATION LIST CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 01 PSNGR CAR PASSENGER CAR, PICKUP, ETC. 0 UNK UNKNOWN 02 BOBTAIL TRUCK TRACTOR WITH NO TRAILERS (BOBTAIL) 1 CLR CLEAR 03 FARM TRCTR FARM TRACTOR OR SELF-PROPELLED FARM EQUIPMENT 2 CLD CLOUDY 04 SEMI TOW TRUCK TRACTOR WITH TRAILER/MOBILE HOME IN TOW 3 RAIN RAIN 05 TRUCK TRUCK WITH NON-DETACHABLE BED, PANEL, ETC. 4 SLT SLEET 06 MOPED MOPED, MINIBIKE, MOTOR SCOOTER, OR MOTOR BICYCLE 5 FOG FOG 07 SCHL BUS SCHOOL BUS (INCLUDES VAN) 6 SNOW SNOW 08 0TH BUS OTHER BUS 7 DUST DUST 09 MTRCYCLE MOTORCYCLE 8 SMOK SMOKE 10 OTHER OTHER: FORKLIFT, BACKHOE, ETC. 9 ASH ASH 11 MOTRHOME MOTORHOME 12 TROLLEY MOTORIZED STREET CAR/TROLLEY (NO RAILS/WIRES) 13 ATV ATV 14 MTRSCTR MOTORIZED SCOOTER 15 SNOWMOBILE SNOWMOBILE 99 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN VEHICLE TYPE CDS150 07/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION-CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE OR 99W(Hwy 091)@ SW Dartmouth Street/SW 78th Avenue January 1,2007 through December 31,2011 NON- PROPERTY INTER- FATAL FATAL DAMAGE TOTAL PEOPLE PEOPLE DRY WET INTER- SECTION OFF- COLLISION TYPE CRASHES CRASHES ONLY CRASHES KILLED INJURED TRUCKS SURF SURF DAY DARK SECTION RELATED ROAD YEAR: 2011 REAR-END 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2011 TOTAL 0 1 2 3 0 1 0 3 0 2 1 3 0 0 YEAR: 2010 REAR-END 0 1 4 5 0 3 0 3 2 3 2 5 0 0 2010 TOTAL 0 1 4 5 0 3 0 3 2 3 2 5 0 0 YEAR: 2009 REAR-END 0 2 1 3 0 3 0 2 1 2 1 3 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2009 TOTAL 0 2 2 4 0 3 0 2 2 3 1 4 0 0 YEAR: 2008 REAR-END 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2008 TOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 YEAR: 2007 REAR-END 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2007 TOTAL 0 0 3 3 0 0 1 3 0 2 1 3 0 0 FINAL TOTAL 0 4 12 16 0 7 1 12 4 11 5 16 0 0 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes are reported for the 2011 data file compared to previous years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ SW Dartmouth Street / SW 78th Avenue January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 01462 N N N 03/30/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE Mon TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 4P PORTLAND UA 8.37 SW 78TH AVE 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 57 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02818 NNNNN 06/09/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY Wed TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 8P PORTLAND UA 8.37 SW 78TH AVE 06 0 N DUSK PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 29 M OR-Y 043,026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 35 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR>25 00527 NNNNN 01/29/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 CITY Sat TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 5P PORTLAND UA 8.37 SW 78TH AVE 06 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 72 F OTH-Y 043,026 000 07 N-RES 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 28 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG NO<5 01 M 000 000 00 05657 N N N 10/13/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE Thu TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 10A PORTLAND UA 8.37 SW 72ND AVE 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 74 M OTH-Y 000 000 00 N-RES 03768 N N N 07/19/2011 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 4-LEG N N CLR 0-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02 NO RPT Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE SW NW 000 00 1P PORTLAND UA 8.37 SW 78TH AVE 01 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 89 F OR-Y 004,028 000 02 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE NE SW 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 36 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 2 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ SW Dartmouth Street / SW 78th Avenue January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 04022 N N N 07/31/2008 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 092 07,26 NO RPT Thu TIGARD 0 0 SW DARTMOUTH ST NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 7P PORTLAND UA 8.38 SW PACIFIC HY 99W 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 28 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 092 26 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 56 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 05533 N N N 10/16/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 27,07 NONE Sat TIGARD 0 0 SW DARTMOUTH ST NE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 00 3P PORTLAND UA 8.38 SW PACIFIC HY 99W 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 35 F OR-Y 016,026 000 27,07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NE SW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 80416 Y N N 01/27/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N SNOW ANGL-STP 01 NONE 0 TURN-R 124 01 NONE Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW DARTMOUTH ST SE TRF SIGNAL N ICE TURN PRVTE SW SE 000 124 00 9A PORTLAND UA 8.38 SW PACIFIC HY 99W 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 F OR-Y 047,001 000 01 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE NW 012 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK 000 000 00 OR<25 00780 N N N 02/15/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE Sun TIGARD 0 0 SW DARTMOUTH ST SW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 12P PORTLAND UA 8.38 SW PACIFIC HY 99W 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 51 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 24 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 24 F 000 000 00 05664 N N N 11/08/2009 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 07 NONE Sun TIGARD 0 0 SW DARTMOUTH ST SW TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 00 9P PORTLAND UA 8.38 SW PACIFIC HY 99W 06 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 19 M OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 32 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 3 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING 091 PACIFIC HIGHWAY WEST OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ SW Dartmouth Street / SW 78th Avenue January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE EAUCO DATE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST D C S L K TIME URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 03 UNKN 0 STOP UNKN SW NE 011 00 UNKNOWN 01 DRVR NONE 00 U UNK 000 000 00 UNK 04910 YNNNN 09/18/2010 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER 4-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 076 01 CITY Sat TIGARD 0 0 SW DARTMOUTH ST SW OFCR/FLAG N WET REAR PUBLC SW NE 001 076 00 7P PORTLAND UA 8.38 SW PACIFIC HY 99W 06 0 N DUSK INJ SCHL BUS 01 DRVR NONE 56 M OR-Y 047,026 000 01 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 18 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 19 F 000 000 00 03 PSNG INJC 19 F 000 000 00 04105 NNNYY 04/17/2007 WASHINGTON 1 14 INTER CROSS N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE TURN-R 02 Tue TIGARD 0 0 SW DARTMOUTH ST CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE SE NE 016 00 11A PORTLAND UA 8.38 SW PACIFIC HY 99W 02 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 75 F OR-Y 028 000 02 OR<25 02 NONE 1 STRGHT PRVTE SW NE 000 00 SEMI TOW 01 DRVR NONE 45 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY OR 99W (Hwy 091) @ SW Dartmouth Street / SW 78th Avenue January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW INT-TYP SPCL USE E AUCO DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFF-RD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST DCSLK TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 01278 N N N 03/05/2007 17 SW DARTMOUTH ST INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 10 NONE Mon 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SE NW 000 00 6P 06 0 N DUSK PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 67 M OR-Y 014,026 000 10 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE NW 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 26 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 07018 N N N 11/20/2007 17 SW DARTMOUTH ST INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 UNKN 9 STRGHT 013 07 NO RPT Tue 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SE TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE SE NW 000 00 1P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE NW 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 47 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SE NW 022 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 52 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 01599 NNNNN 04/02/2010 17 SW DARTMOUTH ST INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 089 07 CITY Fri 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S N 000 089 00 12P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 M OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S N 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 58 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 01600 N N N 04/02/2010 17 SW DARTMOUTH ST INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 07 NO RPT Fri 0 SW PACIFIC HY 99W S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S N 000 00 12P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 F OR-Y 026 000 07 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S N 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S N 011 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 000 000 00 OR<25 04 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S N 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 53 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 ACTION CODE TRANSLATION LIST ACTION SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 000 NONE NO ACTION OR NON-WARRANTED 001 SKIDDED SKIDDED 002 ON/OFF V GETTING ON OR OFF STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE 003 LOAD OVR OVERHANGING LOAD STRUCK ANOTHER VEHICLE, ETC. 006 SLOW DN SLOWED DOWN 007 AVOIDING AVOIDING MANEUVER 008 PAR PARK PARALLEL PARKING 009 ANG PARK ANGLE PARKING 010 INTERFERE PASSENGER INTERFERING WITH DRIVER 011 STOPPED STOPPED IN TRAFFIC NOT WAITING TO MAKE A LEFT TURN 012 STP/L TRN STOPPED BECAUSE OF LEFT TURN SIGNAL OR WAITING, ETC. 013 STP TURN STOPPED WHILE EXECUTING A TURN 015 GO A/STOP PROCEED AFTER STOPPING FOR A STOP SIGN/FLASHING RED. 016 TRN A/RED TURNED ON RED AFTER STOPPING 017 LOSTCTRL LOST CONTROL OF VEHICLE 018 EXIT DWY ENTERING STREET OR HIGHWAY FROM ALLEY OR DRIVEWAY 019 ENTR DWY ENTERING ALLEY OR DRIVEWAY FROM STREET OR HIGHWAY 020 STR ENTR BEFORE ENTERING ROADWAY, STRUCK PEDESTRIAN, ETC. ON SIDEWALK OR SHOULDER 021 NO DRVR CAR RAN AWAY - NO DRIVER 022 PREV COL STRUCK, OR WAS STRUCK BY, VEHICLE OR PEDESTRIAN IN PRIOR COLLISION BEFORE ACC. STABILIZED 023 STALLED VEHICLE STALLED 024 DRVR DEAD DEAD BY UNASSOCIATED CAUSE 025 FATIGUE FATIGUED, SLEEPY, ASLEEP 026 SUN DRIVER BLINDED BY SUN 027 HDLGHTS DRIVER BLINDED BY HEADLIGHTS 028 ILLNESS PHYSICALLY ILL 029 THRU MED VEHICLE CROSSED, PLUNGED OVER, OR THROUGH MEDIAN BARRIER 030 PURSUIT PURSUING OR ATTEMPTING TO STOP ANOTHER VEHICLE 031 PASSING PASSING SITUATION 032 PRKOFFRD VEHICLE PARKED BEYOND CURB OR SHOULDER 033 CROS MED VEHICLE CROSSED EARTH OR GRASS MEDIAN 034 X N/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - NO TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 035 X W/ SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 036 DIAGONAL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - DIAGONALLY 037 BTWN INT CROSSING BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS 038 DISTRACT DRIVER'S ATTENTION DISTRACTED 039 W/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER WITH TRAFFIC 040 A/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER FACING TRAFFIC 041 W/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT WITH TRAFFIC 042 A/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT FACING TRAFFIC 043 PLAYINRD PLAYING IN STREET OR ROAD 044 PUSH MV PUSHING OR WORKING ON VEHICLE IN ROAD OR ON SHOULDER 045 WORK ON WORKING IN ROADWAY OR ALONG SHOULDER 050 LAY ON RD STANDING OR LYING IN ROADWAY 051 ENT OFFRD ENTERING / STARTING IN TRAFFIC LANE FROM OFF-ROAD 088 OTHER OTHER ACTION 099 UNK UNKNOWN ACTION CAUSE CODE TRANSLATION LIST COLLISION TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST CAUSE SHORT COLL SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 00 NO CODE NO CAUSE ASSOCIATED AT THIS LEVEL & 0TH MISCELLANEOUS 01 TOO-FAST TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS (NOT EXCEED POSTED SPEED - BACK BACKING 02 NO-YIELD DID NOT YIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 PED PEDESTRIAN 03 PAS-STOP PASSED STOP SIGN OR RED FLASHER 1 ANGL ANGLE 04 DIS--RAG DISREGARDED R-A-G TRAFFIC SIGNAL. 2 HEAD HEAD-ON 05 LEFT-CTR DROVE LEFT OF CENTER ON TWO-WAY ROAD 3 REAR REAR-END 06 IMP-OVER IMPROPER OVERTAKING 4 SS-M SIDESWIPE - MEETING 07 TOO-CLOS FOLLOWED TOO CLOSELY 5 SS-0 SIDESWIPE - OVERTAKING 08 IMP-TURN MADE IMPROPER TURN 6 TURN TURNING MOVEMENT 09 DRINKING ALCOHOL OR DRUG INVOLVED 7 PARK PARKING MANEUVER 10 OTHR-IMP OTHER IMPROPER DRIVING 8 NCOL NON-COLLISION 11 MECH-DEF MECHANICAL DEFECT 9 FIX FIXED OBJECT OR OTHER OBJECT 12 OTHER OTHER (NOT IMPROPER DRIVING) 13 IMP LN C IMPROPER CHANGE OF TRAFFIC LANES 14 DIS TCD DISREGARDED OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE 15 WRNG WAY WRONG WAY ON ONE-WAY ROADWAY 16 FATIGUE DRIVER DROWSY/FATIGUED/SLEEPY 18 IN RDWY NON-MOTORIST ILLEGALLY IN ROADWAY 19 NT VISBL NON-MOTORIST CLOTHING NOT VISIBLE 20 IMP PKNG VEHICLE IMPROPERLY PARKED 21 DEF STER DEFECTIVE STEERING MECHANISM CRASH TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST 22 DEF BRKE INADEQUATE OR NO BRAKES 24 LOADSHFT VEHICLE LOST LOAD OR LOAD SHIFTED CRASH SHORT 25 TIREFAIL TIRE FAILURE TYPE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 26 PHANTOM PHANTOM / NON-CONTACT VEHICLE & OVERTURN OVERTURNED 27 INATTENT INATTENTION 0 NON-COLL OTHER NON-COLLISION 30 SPEED DRIVING IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED 1 0TH RDWY MOTOR VEHICLE ON OTHER ROADWAY 31 RACING SPEED RACING (PER PAR) 2 PRKD MV PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE 32 CARELESS CARELESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 3 PED PEDESTRIAN 33 RECKLESS RECKLESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 4 TRAIN RAILWAY TRAIN 34 AGGRESV AGGRESSIVE DRIVING (PER PAR) 6 BIKE PEDALCYCLIST 35 RD RAGE ROAD RAGE (PER PAR) 7 ANIMAL ANIMAL 8 FIX OBJ FIXED OBJECT 9 OTH OBJ OTHER OBJECT A ANGL-STP ENTERING AT ANGLE - ONE VEHICLE STOPPED B ANGL-OTH ENTERING AT ANGLE - ALL OTHERS C S-STRGHT FROM SAME DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT D S-1TURN FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT E S-1STOP FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED F S-OTHER FROM SAME DIRECTION-ALL OTHERS, INCLUDING PARKING G O-STRGHT FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT H 0-1TURN FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT I 0-1STOP FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED J 0-OTHER FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION-ALL OTHERS INCL. PARKING DRIVER LICENSE CODE TRANSLATION LIST DRIVER RESIDENCE CODE TRANSLATION LIST LIC SHORT RES SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 0 NONE NOT LICENSED (HAD NEVER BEEN LICENSED) 1 OR<25 OREGON RESIDENT WITHIN 25 MILE OF HOME 1 OR-Y VALID OREGON LICENSE 2 OR>25 OREGON RESIDENT 25 OR MORE MILES FROM HOME 2 OTH-Y VALID LICENSE, OTHER STATE OR COUNTRY 3 OR-? OREGON RESIDENT - UNKNOWN DISTANCE FROM HOME 4 N-RES NON-RESIDENT 3 SUSP SUSPENDED/REVOKED 9 UNK UNKNOWN IF OREGON RESIDENT ERROR CODE TRANSLATION LIST ERROR SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION 000 NONE NO ERROR 001 WIDE TRN WIDE TURN 002 CUT CORN CUT CORNER ON TURN 003 FAIL TRN FAILED TO OBEY MANDATORY TRAFFIC TURN SIGNAL, SIGN OR LANE MARKINGS 004 L IN TRF LEFT TURN IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC 005 L PROHIB LEFT TURN WHERE PROHIBITED 006 FRM WRNG TURNED FROM WRONG LANE 007 TO WRONG TURNED INTO WRONG LANE 008 ILLEG U U-TURNED ILLEGALLY 009 IMP STOP IMPROPERLY STOPPED IN TRAFFIC LANE 010 IMP SIG IMPROPER SIGNAL OR FAILURE TO SIGNAL 011 IMP BACK BACKING IMPROPERLY (NOT PARKING) 012 IMP PARK IMPROPERLY PARKED 013 UNPARK IMPROPER START LEAVING PARKED POSITION 014 IMP STRT IMPROPER START FROM STOPPED POSITION 015 IMP LGHT IMPROPER OR NO LIGHTS (VEHICLE IN TRAFFIC) 016 INATTENT FAILED TO DIM LIGHTS (UNTIL 4/1/97) / INATTENTION (AFTER 4/1/97) 017 UNSF VEH DRIVING UNSAFE VEHICLE (NO OTHER ERROR APPARENT) 018 OTH PARK ENTERING/EXITING PARKED POSITION W/ INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE; OTHER IMPROPER PARKING MANEUVER 019 DIS DRIV DISREGARDED OTHER DRIVER'S SIGNAL 020 DIS SGNL DISREGARDED TRAFFIC SIGNAL 021 RAN STOP DISREGARDED STOP SIGN OR FLASHING RED 022 DIS SIGN DISREGARDED WARNING SIGN, FLARES OR FLASHING AMBER 023 DIS OFCR DISREGARDED POLICE OFFICER OR FLAGMAN 024 DIS EMER DISREGARDED SIREN OR WARNING OF EMERGENCY VEHICLE 025 DIS RR DISREGARDED RR SIGNAL, RR SIGN, OR RR FLAGMAN 026 REAR-END FAILED TO AVOID STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE AHEAD OTHER THAN SCHOOL BUS 027 BIKE ROW DID NOT HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY OVER PEDALCYCLIST 028 NO ROW DID NOT HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY 029 PED ROW FAILED TO YIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO PEDESTRIAN 030 PAS CURV PASSING ON A CURVE 031 PAS WRNG PASSING ON THE WRONG SIDE 032 PAS TANG PASSING ON STRAIGHT ROAD UNDER UNSAFE CONDITIONS 033 PAS X-WK PASSED VEHICLE STOPPED AT CROSSWALK FOR PEDESTRIAN 034 PAS INTR PASSING AT INTERSECTION 035 PAS HILL PASSING ON CREST OF HILL 036 N/PAS ZN PASSING IN "NO PASSING" ZONE 037 PAS TRAF PASSING IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC 038 CUT-IN CUTTING IN (TWO LANES - TWO WAY ONLY) 039 WRNGSIDE DRIVING ON WRONG SIDE OF THE ROAD 040 THRU MED DRIVING THROUGH SAFETY ZONE OR OVER ISLAND 041 F/ST BUS FAILED TO STOP FOR SCHOOL BUS ERROR CODE TRANSLATION LIST ERROR SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION 042 F/SLO MV FAILED TO DECREASE SPEED FOR SLOWER MOVING VEHICLE 043 TO CLOSE FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY (MUST BE ON OFFICER'S REPORT) 044 STRDL LN STRADDLING OR DRIVING ON WRONG LANES 045 IMP CHG IMPROPER CHANGE OF TRAFFIC LANES 046 WRNG WAY WRONG WAY ON ONE-WAY ROADWAY (DELIBERATELY TRAVELING ON WRONG SIDE) 047 BASCRULE DRIVING TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS (NOT EXCEEDING POSTED SPEED) 048 OPN DOOR OPENED DOOR INTO ADJACENT TRAFFIC LANE 049 IMPEDING IMPEDING TRAFFIC 050 SPEED DRIVING IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED 051 RECKLESS RECKLESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 052 CARELESS CARELESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 053 RACING SPEED RACING (PER PAR) 054 X N/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION, NO TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 055 X W/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION, TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 056 DIAGONAL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - DIAGONALLY 057 BTWN INT CROSSING BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS 059 W/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER WITH TRAFFIC 060 A/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER FACING TRAFFIC 061 W/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT WITH TRAFFIC 062 A/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT FACING TRAFFIC 063 PLAYINRD PLAYING IN STREET OR ROAD 064 PUSH MV PUSHING OR WORKING ON VEHICLE IN ROAD OR ON SHOULDER 065 WK IN RD WORKING IN ROADWAY OR ALONG SHOULDER 070 LAYON RD STANDING OR LYING IN ROADWAY 073 ELUDING ELUDING 080 FAIL LN FAILED TO MAINTAIN LANE 081 OFF RD RAN OFF ROAD 082 NO CLEAR DRIVER MISJUDGED CLEARANCE 083 OVRSTEER OVERCORRECTING 084 NOT USED CODE NOT IN USE 085 OVRLOAD OVERLOADING OR IMPROPER LOADING OF VEHICLE WITH CARGO OR PASSENGERS 097 UNA DIS TC UNABLE TO DETERMINE WHICH DRIVER DISREGARDED TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE EVENT CODE TRANSLATION LIST EVENT SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 001 FEL/JUMP OCCUPANT FELL, JUMPED OR WAS EJECTED FROM MOVING VEHICLE 002 INTERFER PASSENGER INTERFERED WITH DRIVER 003 BUG INTF ANIMAL OR INSECT IN VEHICLE INTERFERED WITH DRIVER 004 PED INV PEDESTRIAN INVOLVED (NON-PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENT) 005 SUB-PED "SUB-PED": PEDESTRIAN INJURED SUBSEQUENT TO COLLISION, ETC. 006 BIKE INV TRICYCLE-BICYCLE INVOLVED 007 HITCHIKR HITCHHIKER (SOLICITING A RIDE) 008 PSNGR TOW PASSENGER BEING TOWED OR PUSHED ON CONVEYANCE 009 ON/OFF V GETTING ON OR OFF STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE (OCCUPANTS ONLY) 010 SUB OTRN OVERTURNED AFTER FIRST HARMFUL EVENT 011 MV PUSHD VEHICLE BEING PUSHED 012 MV TOWED VEHICLE TOWED OR HAD BEEN TOWING ANOTHER VEHICLE 013 FORCED VEHICLE FORCED BY IMPACT INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE, PEDALCYCLIST OR PEDESTRIAN 014 SET MOTN VEHICLE SET IN MOTION BY NON-DRIVER (CHILD RELEASED BRAKES, ETC.) 015 RR ROW AT OR ON RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY (NOT LIGHT RAIL) 016 LT RL ROW AT OR ON LIGHT-RAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY 017 RR HIT V TRAIN STRUCK VEHICLE 018 V HIT RR VEHICLE STRUCK TRAIN 019 HIT RR CAR VEHICLE STRUCK RAILROAD CAR ON ROADWAY 020 JACKNIFE JACKKNIFE; TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE STRUCK TOWING VEHICLE 021 TRL OTRN TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE OVERTURNED 022 CN BROKE TRAILER CONNECTION BROKE 023 DETACH TRL DETACHED TRAILING OBJECT STRUCK OTHER VEHICLE, NON-MOTORIST, OR OBJECT 024 V DOOR OPN VEHICLE DOOR OPENED INTO ADJACENT TRAFFIC LANE 025 WHEELOFF WHEEL CAME OFF 026 HOOD UP HOOD FLEW UP 028 LOAD SHIFT LOST LOAD, LOAD MOVED OR SHIFTED 029 TIREFAIL TIRE FAILURE 030 PET PET: CAT, DOG AND SIMILAR 031 LVSTOCK STOCK: COW, CALF, BULL, STEER, SHEEP, ETC. 032 HORSE HORSE, MULE, OR DONKEY 033 HRSE&RID HORSE AND RIDER 034 GAME WILD ANIMAL, GAME (INCLUDES BIRDS; NOT DEER OR ELK) 035 DEER ELK DEER OR ELK, WAPITI 036 ANML VEH ANIMAL-DRAWN VEHICLE 037 CULVERT CULVERT, OPEN LOW OR HIGH MANHOLE 038 ATENUATN IMPACT ATTENUATOR 039 PK METER PARKING METER 040 CURB CURB (ALSO NARROW SIDEWALKS ON BRIDGES) 041 JIGGLE JIGGLE BARS OR TRAFFIC SNAKE FOR CHANNELIZATION 042 GDRL END LEADING EDGE OF GUARDRAIL 043 GARDRAIL GUARD RAIL (NOT METAL MEDIAN BARRIER) 044 BARRIER MEDIAN BARRIER (RAISED OR METAL) 045 WALL RETAINING WALL OR TUNNEL WALL 046 BR RAIL BRIDGE RAILING (ON BRIDGE AND APPROACH) 047 BR ABUT BRIDGE ABUTMENT (APPROACH ENDS) 048 BR COLMN BRIDGE PILLAR OR COLUMN (EVEN THOUGH STRUCK PROTECTIVE GUARD RAIL FIRST) 049 BR GIRDR BRIDGE GIRDER (HORIZONTAL STRUCTURE OVERHEAD) 050 ISLAND TRAFFIC RAISED ISLAND 051 GORE GORE 052 POLE UNK POLE - TYPE UNKNOWN 053 POLE UTL POLE - POWER OR TELEPHONE 054 ST LIGHT POLE - STREET LIGHT ONLY 055 TRF SGNL POLE - TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND PED SIGNAL ONLY 056 SGN BRDG POLE - SIGN BRIDGE 057 STOPSIGN STOP OR YIELD SIGN 058 0TH SIGN OTHER SIGN, INCLUDING STREET SIGNS 059 HYDRANT HYDRANT EVENT CODE TRANSLATION LIST EVENT SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 060 MARKER DELINEATOR OR MARKER (REFLECTOR POSTS) 061 MAILBOX MAILBOX 062 TREE TREE, STUMP OR SHRUBS 063 VEG OHED TREE BRANCH OR OTHER VEGETATION OVERHEAD, ETC. 064 WIRE/CBL WIRE OR CABLE ACROSS OR OVER THE ROAD 065 TEMP SGN TEMPORARY SIGN OR BARRICADE IN ROAD, ETC. 066 PERM SGN PERMANENT SIGN OR BARRICADE IN/OFF ROAD 067 SLIDE SLIDES, FALLEN OR FALLING ROCKS 068 FRGN OBJ FOREIGN OBSTRUCTION/DEBRIS IN ROAD (NOT GRAVEL) 069 EQP WORK EQUIPMENT WORKING IN/OFF ROAD 070 0TH EQP OTHER EQUIPMENT IN OR OFF ROAD (INCLUDES PARKED TRAILER, BOAT) 071 MAIN EQP WRECKER, STREET SWEEPER, SNOW PLOW OR SANDING EQUIPMENT 072 OTHER WALL ROCK, BRICK OR OTHER SOLID WALL 073 IRRGL PVMT SPEED BUMP, OTHER BUMP, POTHOLE OR PAVEMENT IRREGULARITY (PER PAR) 075 CAVE IN BRIDGE OR ROAD CAVE IN 076 HI WATER HIGH WATER 077 SNO BANK SNOW BANK 078 HOLE CHUCKHOLE IN ROAD, LOW OR HIGH SHOULDER AT PAVEMENT EDGE 079 DITCH CUT SLOPE OR DITCH EMBANKMENT 080 OBJ F MV STRUCK BY ROCK OR OTHER OBJECT SET IN MOTION BY OTHER VEHICLE (INCL. LOST LOADS) 081 FLY-OBJ STRUCK BY OTHER MOVING OR FLYING OBJECT 082 VEH HID VEHICLE OBSCURED VIEW 083 VEG HID VEGETATION OBSCURED VIEW 084 BLDG HID VIEW OBSCURED BY FENCE, SIGN, PHONE BOOTH, ETC. 085 WIND GUST WIND GUST 086 IMMERSED VEHICLE IMMERSED IN BODY OF WATER 087 FIRE/EXP FIRE OR EXPLOSION 088 FENC/BLD FENCE OR BUILDING, ETC. 089 OTH ACDT ACCIDENT RELATED TO ANOTHER SEPARATE ACCIDENT 090 TO 1 SIDE TWO-WAY TRAFFIC ON DIVIDED ROADWAY ALL ROUTED TO ONE SIDE 092 PHANTOM OTHER (PHANTOM) NON-CONTACT VEHICLE (ON PAR OR REPORT) 093 CELL-POL CELL PHONE (ON PAR OR DRIVER IN USE) 094 VIOL GDL TEENAGE DRIVER IN VIOLATION OF GRADUATED LICENSE PGM 095 GUY WIRE GUY WIRE 096 BERM BERM (EARTHEN OR GRAVEL MOUND) 097 GRAVEL GRAVEL IN ROADWAY 098 ABR EDGE ABRUPT EDGE 099 CELL-WTN CELL PHONE USE WITNESSED BY OTHER PARTICIPANT 100 UNK FIXD UNKNOWN TYPE OF FIXED OBJECT 101 OTHER OBJ OTHER OR UNKNOWN OBJECT, NOT FIXED 104 OUTSIDE V PASSENGER RIDING ON VEHICLE EXTERIOR 105 PEDAL PSGR PASSENGER RIDING ON PEDALCYCLE 106 MAN WHLCHR PEDESTRIAN IN NON-MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR 107 MTR WHLCHR PEDESTRIAN IN MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR 110 N-MTR NON-MOTORIST STRUCK VEHICLE 111 S CAR VS V STREET CAR/TROLLEY (ON RAILS AND/OR OVERHEAD WIRE SYSTEM) STRUCK VEHICLE 112 V VS S CAR VEHICLE STRUCK STREET CAR/TROLLEY (ON RAILS AND/OR OVERHEAD WIRE SYSTEM) 113 S CAR ROW AT OR ON STREET CAR/TROLLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY 114 RR EQUIP VEHICLE STRUCK RAILROAD EQUIPMENT (NOT TRAIN) ON TRACKS 120 WIRE BAR WIRE OR CABLE MEDIAN BARRIER 124 SLIPPERY SLIDING OR SWERVING DUE TO WET, ICY, SLIPPERY OR LOOSE SURFACE 125 SHLDR SHOULDER GAVE WAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION TRANSLATION LIST HIGHWAY COMPONENT TRANSLATION LIST FUNC CLASS DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION 01 RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE 0 MAINLINE STATE HIGHWAY 02 RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER 1 COUPLET 06 RURAL MINOR ARTERIAL 3 FRONTAGE ROAD 07 RURAL MAJOR COLLECTOR 6 CONNECTION 8 HIGHWAY - OTHER 08 RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR 09 RURAL LOCAL 11 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE 12 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER FREEWAYS AND EXP 14 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER 16 URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL 17 URBAN COLLECTOR 19 URBAN LOCAL 78 UNKNOWN RURAL SYSTEM 79 UNKNOWN RURAL NON-SYSTEM 98 UNKNOWN URBAN SYSTEM 99 UNKNOWN URBAN NON-SYSTEM INJURY SEVERITY CODE TRANSLATION LIST LIGHT CONDITION CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 1 KILL FATAL INJURY 0 UNK UNKNOWN 2 INJA INCAPACITATING INJURY - BLEEDING, BROKEN BONES 1 DAY DAYLIGHT 3 INJB NON-INCAPACITATING INJURY 2 DLIT DARKNESS - WITH STREET LIGHTS 4 INJC POSSIBLE INJURY - COMPLAINT OF PAIN 3 DARK DARKNESS - NO STREET LIGHTS 5 PRI DIED PRIOR TO CRASH 4 DAWN DAWN (TWILIGHT) 7 NO<5 NO INJURY - 0 TO 4 YEARS OF AGE 5 DUSK DUSK (TWILIGHT) MEDIAN TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST MILEAGE TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE LONG DESCRIPTION 0 NONE NO MEDIAN 0 REGULAR MILEAGE 1 RSDMD SOLID MEDIAN BARRIER T TEMPORARY 2 DIVMD EARTH, GRASS OR PAVED MEDIAN Y SPUR Z OVERLAPPING MOVEMENT TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST PARTICIPANT TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 0 UNK UNKNOWN 0 OCC UNKNOWN OCCUPANT TYPE 1 STRGHT STRAIGHT AHEAD 1 DRVR DRIVER 2 TURN-R TURNING RIGHT 2 PSNG PASSENGER 3 TURN-L TURNING LEFT 3 PED PEDESTRIAN 4 CONV PEDESTRIAN USING A PEDESTRIAN CONVEYA 4 U-TURN MAKING A U-TURN 5 PTOW PEDESTRIAN TOWING OR TRAILERING AN OB 5 BACK BACKING 6 BIKE PEDALCYCLIST 6 STOP STOPPED IN TRAFFIC 7 BTOW PEDALCYCLIST TOWING OR TRAILERING AN i 7 PRKD-P PARKED - PROPERLY 8 PRKD OCCUPANT OF A PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE 8 PRKD-I PARKED - IMPROPERLY 9 UNK UNKNOWN TYPE OF NON-MOTORIST PEDESTRIAN LOCATION CODE TRANSLATION LIST TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE CODE TRANSLATION LIST CODE LONG DESCRIPTION CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 00 AT INTERSECTION - NOT IN ROADWAY 000 NONE NO CONTROL 01 AT INTERSECTION - INSIDE CROSSWALK 001 TRF SIGNAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS 02 AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY, OUTSIDE CROSSWALK 002 FLASHBCN-R FLASHING BEACON - RED (STOP) 03 AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY, XWALK AVAIL UNKNWN 003 FLASHBCN-A FLASHING BEACON - AMBER (SLOW) 04 NOT AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY 004 STOP SIGN STOP SIGN 05 NOT AT INTERSECTION - ON SHOULDER 005 SLOW SIGN SLOW SIGN 06 NOT AT INTERSECTION - ON MEDIAN 006 REG-SIGN REGULATORY SIGN 07 NOT AT INTERSECTION - WITHIN TRAFFIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 007 YIELD YIELD SIGN 08 NOT AT INTERSECTION - IN BIKE PATH 008 WARNING WARNING SIGN 09 NOT-AT INTERSECTION - ON SIDEWALK 009 CURVE CURVE SIGN 10 OUTSIDE TRAFFICWAY BOUNDARIES 010 SCHL X-ING SCHOOL CROSSING SIGN OR SPECIAL SIGNAL 15 NOT AT INTERSECTION - INSIDE MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK 011 OFCR/FLAG POLICE OFFICER, FLAGMAN - SCHOOL PATROL 18 OTHER, NOT IN ROADWAY 012 BRDG-GATE BRIDGE GATE - BARRIER 99 UNKNOWN LOCATION 013 TEMP-BARR TEMPORARY BARRIER 014 NO-PASS-ZN NO PASSING ZONE 015 ONE-WAY ONE-WAY STREET 016 CHANNEL CHANNELIZATION 017 MEDIAN BAR MEDIAN BARRIER 018 PILOT CAR PILOT CAR ROAD CHARACTER CODE TRANSLATION LIST 019 SP PED SIG SPECIAL PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL 020 X-BUCK CROSSBUCK SHORT 021 THR-GN-SIG THROUGH GREEN ARROW OR SIGNAL CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 022 L-GRN-SIG LEFT TURN GREEN ARROW, LANE MARKINGS, OR SIGNAL 0 UNK UNKNOWN 023 R-GRN-SIG RIGHT TURN GREEN ARROW, LANE MARKINGS, OR SIGNAL 1 INTER INTERSECTION 024 WIGWAG WIGWAG OR FLASHING LIGHTS W/O DROP-ARM GATE 2 ALLEY DRIVEWAY OR ALLEY 025 X-BUCK WRN CROSSBUCK AND ADVANCE WARNING 026 WW W/ GATE FLASHING LIGHTS WITH DROP-ARM GATES 3 STRGHT STRAIGHT ROADWAY 027 OVRHD SGNL SUPPLEMENTAL OVERHEAD SIGNAL (RR XING ONLY) 4 TRANS TRANSITION 028 SP RR STOP SPECIAL RR STOP SIGN 5 CURVE CURVE (HORIZONTAL CURVE) 029 ILUM GRD X ILLUMINATED GRADE CROSSING 6 OPENAC OPEN ACCESS OR TURNOUT 037 RAMP METER METERED RAMPS 7 GRADE GRADE (VERTICAL CURVE) 038 RUMBLE STR RUMBLE STRIP 8 BRIDGE BRIDGE STRUCTURE 090 L-TURN REF LEFT TURN REFUGE (WHEN REFUGE IS INVOLVED) 9 TUNNEL TUNNEL 091 R-TURN ALL RIGHT TURN AT ALL TIMES SIGN, ETC. 092 EMR SGN/FL EMERGENCY SIGNS OR FLARES 093 ACCEL LANE ACCELERATION OR DECELERATION LANES 094 R-TURN PRO RIGHT TURN PROHIBITED ON RED AFTER STOPPING 095 BUS STPSGN BUS STOP SIGN AND RED LIGHTS 099 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN OR NOT DEFINITE VEHICLE TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST WEATHER CONDITION CODE TRANSLATION LIST CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 01 PSNGR CAR PASSENGER CAR, PICKUP, ETC. 0 UNK UNKNOWN 02 BOBTAIL TRUCK TRACTOR WITH NO TRAILERS (BOBTAIL) 1 CLR CLEAR 03 FARM TRCTR FARM TRACTOR OR SELF-PROPELLED FARM EQUIPMENT 2 CLD CLOUDY 04 SEMI TOW TRUCK TRACTOR WITH TRAILER/MOBILE HOME IN TOW 3 RAIN RAIN 05 TRUCK TRUCK WITH NON-DETACHABLE BED, PANEL, ETC. 4 SLT SLEET 06 MOPED MOPED, MINIBIKE, MOTOR SCOOTER, OR MOTOR BICYCLE 5 FOG FOG 07 SCHL BUS SCHOOL BUS (INCLUDES VAN) 6 SNOW SNOW 08 0TH BUS OTHER BUS 7 DUST DUST 09 MTRCYCLE MOTORCYCLE 8 SMOK SMOKE 10 OTHER OTHER: FORKLIFT, BACKHOE, ETC. 9 ASH ASH 11 MOTRHOME MOTORHOME 12 TROLLEY MOTORIZED STREET CAR/TROLLEY (NO RAILS/WIRES) 13 ATV ATV 14 MTRSCTR MOTORIZED SCOOTER 15 SNOWMOBILE SNOWMOBILE 99 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN VEHICLE TYPE CDS150 07/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION-CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE SW Dartmouth Street @ SW 72nd Avenue January 1,2007 through December 31,2011 NON- PROPERTY INTER- FATAL FATAL DAMAGE TOTAL PEOPLE PEOPLE DRY WET INTER- SECTION OFF- COLLISION TYPE CRASHES CRASHES ONLY CRASHES KILLED INJURED TRUCKS SURF SURF DAY DARK SECTION RELATED ROAD YEAR: 2011 ANGLE 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 FIXED/OTHER OBJECT 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2011 TOTAL 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 0 3 2 1 3 0 1 YEAR: 2010 REAR-END 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2010 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 YEAR: 2009 ANGLE 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 2009 TOTAL 0 3 1 4 0 4 0 2 2 4 0 4 0 0 YEAR: 2008 ANGLE 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 2008 TOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 YEAR: 2007 REAR-END 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2007 TOTAL 0 1 2 3 0 1 0 2 1 3 0 3 0 0 FINAL TOTAL 0 8 4 12 0 10 0 4 8 10 2 12 0 1 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes are reported for the 2011 data file compared to previous years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY SW Dartmouth Street @ SW 72nd Avenue January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW INT-TYP SPCL USE E AUCO DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFF-RD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST DCSLK TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 02735 N N N 06/02/2010 16 SW DARTMOUTH ST INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 UNKN 9 STRGHT 10 NONE Wed 0 SW 72ND AVE N STOP SIGN N WET REAR PRVTE N S 000 00 11A 06 0 N DAY INJ UNKNOWN 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 014,026 000 10 UNK 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N S 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 64 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR>25 03091 NNNNN 06/13/2011 16 SW DARTMOUTH ST INTER CROSS N Y CLD FIX OBJ 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 079,062 16 CITY Mon 0 SW 72ND AVE S STOP SIGN N WET FIX PRVTE N S 000 079,062 00 8A 05 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 45 F OR-Y 080,081 025 16 OR<25 02009 YNNYY 04/11/2007 16 SW DARTMOUTH ST INTER CROSS N N RAIN ANGL-STP 01 NONE TURN-L 01,08 NO RPT Wed 0 SW 72ND AVE S STOP SIGN N WET TURN PRVTE E S 001 00 2P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 43 F OR-Y 002,047,026 017 01,08 OR<25 02 NONE STOP PRVTE S N 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 53 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 06116 YNNYY 10/15/2007 16 SW DARTMOUTH ST INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE STRGHT 01,27 Mon 0 SW 72ND AVE S STOP SIGN N DRY REAR PRVTE S N 000 00 2P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 19 M OR-Y 026 000 01,07 OR<25 02 NONE STOP PRVTE S N 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 50 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 03220 N N N 06/07/2007 17 SW DARTMOUTH ST INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 UNKN 9 STRGHT 07 NONE Thu 0 SW 72ND AVE W STOP SIGN N DRY REAR UNKN W E 000 00 12P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 026 000 07 UNK 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE W E 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 34 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02618 N N N 05/01/2009 16 SW DARTMOUTH ST INTER CROSS N N CLR 0-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02 NO RPT Fri 0 SW 72ND AVE CN STOP SIGN N DRY TURN PRVTE S W 015 00 3P 01 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 30 M OR-Y 028 000 02 OR>25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N S 015 00 MTRCYCLE 01 DRVR INJB 30 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 2 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY SW Dartmouth Street @ SW 72nd Avenue January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW INT-TYP SPCL USE E AUCO DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFF-RD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST DCSLK TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 00242 N N N 01/13/2011 16 SW DARTMOUTH ST INTER CROSS N N RAIN ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 03 CITY Thu 0 SW 72ND AVE CN STOP SIGN N WET ANGL PRVTE N S 000 00 2P 01 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 61 F OTH-Y 021 000 03 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE E W 015 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 34 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02054 N N N 05/04/2009 16 SW DARTMOUTH ST INTER CROSS N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 NO RPT Mon 0 SW 72ND AVE CN STOP SIGN N WET ANGL PRVTE S N 015 00 11A 02 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 88 M OR-Y 028 000 02 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE E W 015 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 00033 N N N 01/02/2008 16 SW DARTMOUTH ST INTER CROSS N N RAIN ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-R 02 NONE Wed 0 SW 72ND AVE CN STOP SIGN N WET ANGL PRVTE W S 015 00 5P 03 0 N DARK PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 28 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N S 015 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 31 F OR-Y 028 000 02 OR<25 07080 N N N Y 12/14/2011 16 SW DARTMOUTH ST INTER CROSS N N RAIN ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 NONE Wed 0 SW 72ND AVE CN STOP SIGN N WET ANGL PRVTE W E 015 00 8P 03 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 67 M OR-Y 028 000 02 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE N S 015 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 43 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 50 F 000 000 00 01912 N N N 04/24/2009 16 SW DARTMOUTH ST INTER CROSS N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 03 NO RPT Fri 0 SW 72ND AVE CN STOP SIGN N DRY ANGL PRVTE S N 000 00 12P 04 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 50 M OR-Y 021 000 03 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE W E 015 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 53 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 05322 NNNNN 10/25/2009 16 SW DARTMOUTH ST INTER CROSS N N RAIN 0-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 03 CITY Sun 0 SW 72ND AVE CN STOP SIGN N WET TURN PRVTE S N 000 00 1P 04 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 51 M OR-Y 021 000 03 OR<25 CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 3 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY SW Dartmouth Street @ SW 72nd Avenue January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW INT-TYP SPCL USE E AUCO DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFF-RD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST DCSLK TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE N E 015 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 15 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 59 F 000 000 00 ACTION CODE TRANSLATION LIST ACTION SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 000 NONE NO ACTION OR NON-WARRANTED 001 SKIDDED SKIDDED 002 ON/OFF V GETTING ON OR OFF STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE 003 LOAD OVR OVERHANGING LOAD STRUCK ANOTHER VEHICLE, ETC. 006 SLOW DN SLOWED DOWN 007 AVOIDING AVOIDING MANEUVER 008 PAR PARK PARALLEL PARKING 009 ANG PARK ANGLE PARKING 010 INTERFERE PASSENGER INTERFERING WITH DRIVER 011 STOPPED STOPPED IN TRAFFIC NOT WAITING TO MAKE A LEFT TURN 012 STP/L TRN STOPPED BECAUSE OF LEFT TURN SIGNAL OR WAITING, ETC. 013 STP TURN STOPPED WHILE EXECUTING A TURN 015 GO A/STOP PROCEED AFTER STOPPING FOR A STOP SIGN/FLASHING RED. 016 TRN A/RED TURNED ON RED AFTER STOPPING 017 LOSTCTRL LOST CONTROL OF VEHICLE 018 EXIT DWY ENTERING STREET OR HIGHWAY FROM ALLEY OR DRIVEWAY 019 ENTR DWY ENTERING ALLEY OR DRIVEWAY FROM STREET OR HIGHWAY 020 STR ENTR BEFORE ENTERING ROADWAY, STRUCK PEDESTRIAN, ETC. ON SIDEWALK OR SHOULDER 021 NO DRVR CAR RAN AWAY - NO DRIVER 022 PREV COL STRUCK, OR WAS STRUCK BY, VEHICLE OR PEDESTRIAN IN PRIOR COLLISION BEFORE ACC. STABILIZED 023 STALLED VEHICLE STALLED 024 DRVR DEAD DEAD BY UNASSOCIATED CAUSE 025 FATIGUE FATIGUED, SLEEPY, ASLEEP 026 SUN DRIVER BLINDED BY SUN 027 HDLGHTS DRIVER BLINDED BY HEADLIGHTS 028 ILLNESS PHYSICALLY ILL 029 THRU MED VEHICLE CROSSED, PLUNGED OVER, OR THROUGH MEDIAN BARRIER 030 PURSUIT PURSUING OR ATTEMPTING TO STOP ANOTHER VEHICLE 031 PASSING PASSING SITUATION 032 PRKOFFRD VEHICLE PARKED BEYOND CURB OR SHOULDER 033 CROS MED VEHICLE CROSSED EARTH OR GRASS MEDIAN 034 X N/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - NO TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 035 X W/ SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 036 DIAGONAL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - DIAGONALLY 037 BTWN INT CROSSING BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS 038 DISTRACT DRIVER'S ATTENTION DISTRACTED 039 W/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER WITH TRAFFIC 040 A/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER FACING TRAFFIC 041 W/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT WITH TRAFFIC 042 A/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT FACING TRAFFIC 043 PLAYINRD PLAYING IN STREET OR ROAD 044 PUSH MV PUSHING OR WORKING ON VEHICLE IN ROAD OR ON SHOULDER 045 WORK ON WORKING IN ROADWAY OR ALONG SHOULDER 050 LAY ON RD STANDING OR LYING IN ROADWAY 051 ENT OFFRD ENTERING / STARTING IN TRAFFIC LANE FROM OFF-ROAD 088 OTHER OTHER ACTION 099 UNK UNKNOWN ACTION CAUSE CODE TRANSLATION LIST COLLISION TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST CAUSE SHORT COLL SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 00 NO CODE NO CAUSE ASSOCIATED AT THIS LEVEL & 0TH MISCELLANEOUS 01 TOO-FAST TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS (NOT EXCEED POSTED SPEED - BACK BACKING 02 NO-YIELD DID NOT YIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 PED PEDESTRIAN 03 PAS-STOP PASSED STOP SIGN OR RED FLASHER 1 ANGL ANGLE 04 DIS--RAG DISREGARDED R-A-G TRAFFIC SIGNAL. 2 HEAD HEAD-ON 05 LEFT-CTR DROVE LEFT OF CENTER ON TWO-WAY ROAD 3 REAR REAR-END 06 IMP-OVER IMPROPER OVERTAKING 4 SS-M SIDESWIPE - MEETING 07 TOO-CLOS FOLLOWED TOO CLOSELY 5 SS-0 SIDESWIPE - OVERTAKING 08 IMP-TURN MADE IMPROPER TURN 6 TURN TURNING MOVEMENT 09 DRINKING ALCOHOL OR DRUG INVOLVED 7 PARK PARKING MANEUVER 10 OTHR-IMP OTHER IMPROPER DRIVING 8 NCOL NON-COLLISION 11 MECH-DEF MECHANICAL DEFECT 9 FIX FIXED OBJECT OR OTHER OBJECT 12 OTHER OTHER (NOT IMPROPER DRIVING) 13 IMP LN C IMPROPER CHANGE OF TRAFFIC LANES 14 DIS TCD DISREGARDED OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE 15 WRNG WAY WRONG WAY ON ONE-WAY ROADWAY 16 FATIGUE DRIVER DROWSY/FATIGUED/SLEEPY 18 IN RDWY NON-MOTORIST ILLEGALLY IN ROADWAY 19 NT VISBL NON-MOTORIST CLOTHING NOT VISIBLE 20 IMP PKNG VEHICLE IMPROPERLY PARKED 21 DEF STER DEFECTIVE STEERING MECHANISM CRASH TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST 22 DEF BRKE INADEQUATE OR NO BRAKES 24 LOADSHFT VEHICLE LOST LOAD OR LOAD SHIFTED CRASH SHORT 25 TIREFAIL TIRE FAILURE TYPE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 26 PHANTOM PHANTOM / NON-CONTACT VEHICLE & OVERTURN OVERTURNED 27 INATTENT INATTENTION 0 NON-COLL OTHER NON-COLLISION 30 SPEED DRIVING IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED 1 0TH RDWY MOTOR VEHICLE ON OTHER ROADWAY 31 RACING SPEED RACING (PER PAR) 2 PRKD MV PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE 32 CARELESS CARELESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 3 PED PEDESTRIAN 33 RECKLESS RECKLESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 4 TRAIN RAILWAY TRAIN 34 AGGRESV AGGRESSIVE DRIVING (PER PAR) 6 BIKE PEDALCYCLIST 35 RD RAGE ROAD RAGE (PER PAR) 7 ANIMAL ANIMAL 8 FIX OBJ FIXED OBJECT 9 OTH OBJ OTHER OBJECT A ANGL-STP ENTERING AT ANGLE - ONE VEHICLE STOPPED B ANGL-OTH ENTERING AT ANGLE - ALL OTHERS C S-STRGHT FROM SAME DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT D S-1TURN FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT E S-1STOP FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED F S-OTHER FROM SAME DIRECTION-ALL OTHERS, INCLUDING PARKING G O-STRGHT FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT H 0-1TURN FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT I 0-1STOP FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED J 0-OTHER FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION-ALL OTHERS INCL. PARKING DRIVER LICENSE CODE TRANSLATION LIST DRIVER RESIDENCE CODE TRANSLATION LIST LIC SHORT RES SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 0 NONE NOT LICENSED (HAD NEVER BEEN LICENSED) 1 OR<25 OREGON RESIDENT WITHIN 25 MILE OF HOME 1 OR-Y VALID OREGON LICENSE 2 OR>25 OREGON RESIDENT 25 OR MORE MILES FROM HOME 2 OTH-Y VALID LICENSE, OTHER STATE OR COUNTRY 3 OR-? OREGON RESIDENT - UNKNOWN DISTANCE FROM HOME 4 N-RES NON-RESIDENT 3 SUSP SUSPENDED/REVOKED 9 UNK UNKNOWN IF OREGON RESIDENT ERROR CODE TRANSLATION LIST ERROR SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION 000 NONE NO ERROR 001 WIDE TRN WIDE TURN 002 CUT CORN CUT CORNER ON TURN 003 FAIL TRN FAILED TO OBEY MANDATORY TRAFFIC TURN SIGNAL, SIGN OR LANE MARKINGS 004 L IN TRF LEFT TURN IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC 005 L PROHIB LEFT TURN WHERE PROHIBITED 006 FRM WRNG TURNED FROM WRONG LANE 007 TO WRONG TURNED INTO WRONG LANE 008 ILLEG U U-TURNED ILLEGALLY 009 IMP STOP IMPROPERLY STOPPED IN TRAFFIC LANE 010 IMP SIG IMPROPER SIGNAL OR FAILURE TO SIGNAL 011 IMP BACK BACKING IMPROPERLY (NOT PARKING) 012 IMP PARK IMPROPERLY PARKED 013 UNPARK IMPROPER START LEAVING PARKED POSITION 014 IMP STRT IMPROPER START FROM STOPPED POSITION 015 IMP LGHT IMPROPER OR NO LIGHTS (VEHICLE IN TRAFFIC) 016 INATTENT FAILED TO DIM LIGHTS (UNTIL 4/1/97) / INATTENTION (AFTER 4/1/97) 017 UNSF VEH DRIVING UNSAFE VEHICLE (NO OTHER ERROR APPARENT) 018 OTH PARK ENTERING/EXITING PARKED POSITION W/ INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE; OTHER IMPROPER PARKING MANEUVER 019 DIS DRIV DISREGARDED OTHER DRIVER'S SIGNAL 020 DIS SGNL DISREGARDED TRAFFIC SIGNAL 021 RAN STOP DISREGARDED STOP SIGN OR FLASHING RED 022 DIS SIGN DISREGARDED WARNING SIGN, FLARES OR FLASHING AMBER 023 DIS OFCR DISREGARDED POLICE OFFICER OR FLAGMAN 024 DIS EMER DISREGARDED SIREN OR WARNING OF EMERGENCY VEHICLE 025 DIS RR DISREGARDED RR SIGNAL, RR SIGN, OR RR FLAGMAN 026 REAR-END FAILED TO AVOID STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE AHEAD OTHER THAN SCHOOL BUS 027 BIKE ROW DID NOT HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY OVER PEDALCYCLIST 028 NO ROW DID NOT HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY 029 PED ROW FAILED TO YIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO PEDESTRIAN 030 PAS CURV PASSING ON A CURVE 031 PAS WRNG PASSING ON THE WRONG SIDE 032 PAS TANG PASSING ON STRAIGHT ROAD UNDER UNSAFE CONDITIONS 033 PAS X-WK PASSED VEHICLE STOPPED AT CROSSWALK FOR PEDESTRIAN 034 PAS INTR PASSING AT INTERSECTION 035 PAS HILL PASSING ON CREST OF HILL 036 N/PAS ZN PASSING IN "NO PASSING" ZONE 037 PAS TRAF PASSING IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC 038 CUT-IN CUTTING IN (TWO LANES - TWO WAY ONLY) 039 WRNGSIDE DRIVING ON WRONG SIDE OF THE ROAD 040 THRU MED DRIVING THROUGH SAFETY ZONE OR OVER ISLAND 041 F/ST BUS FAILED TO STOP FOR SCHOOL BUS ERROR CODE TRANSLATION LIST ERROR SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION 042 F/SLO MV FAILED TO DECREASE SPEED FOR SLOWER MOVING VEHICLE 043 TO CLOSE FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY (MUST BE ON OFFICER'S REPORT) 044 STRDL LN STRADDLING OR DRIVING ON WRONG LANES 045 IMP CHG IMPROPER CHANGE OF TRAFFIC LANES 046 WRNG WAY WRONG WAY ON ONE-WAY ROADWAY (DELIBERATELY TRAVELING ON WRONG SIDE) 047 BASCRULE DRIVING TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS (NOT EXCEEDING POSTED SPEED) 048 OPN DOOR OPENED DOOR INTO ADJACENT TRAFFIC LANE 049 IMPEDING IMPEDING TRAFFIC 050 SPEED DRIVING IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED 051 RECKLESS RECKLESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 052 CARELESS CARELESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 053 RACING SPEED RACING (PER PAR) 054 X N/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION, NO TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 055 X W/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION, TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 056 DIAGONAL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - DIAGONALLY 057 BTWN INT CROSSING BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS 059 W/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER WITH TRAFFIC 060 A/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER FACING TRAFFIC 061 W/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT WITH TRAFFIC 062 A/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT FACING TRAFFIC 063 PLAYINRD PLAYING IN STREET OR ROAD 064 PUSH MV PUSHING OR WORKING ON VEHICLE IN ROAD OR ON SHOULDER 065 WK IN RD WORKING IN ROADWAY OR ALONG SHOULDER 070 LAYON RD STANDING OR LYING IN ROADWAY 073 ELUDING ELUDING 080 FAIL LN FAILED TO MAINTAIN LANE 081 OFF RD RAN OFF ROAD 082 NO CLEAR DRIVER MISJUDGED CLEARANCE 083 OVRSTEER OVERCORRECTING 084 NOT USED CODE NOT IN USE 085 OVRLOAD OVERLOADING OR IMPROPER LOADING OF VEHICLE WITH CARGO OR PASSENGERS 097 UNA DIS TC UNABLE TO DETERMINE WHICH DRIVER DISREGARDED TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE EVENT CODE TRANSLATION LIST EVENT SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 001 FEL/JUMP OCCUPANT FELL, JUMPED OR WAS EJECTED FROM MOVING VEHICLE 002 INTERFER PASSENGER INTERFERED WITH DRIVER 003 BUG INTF ANIMAL OR INSECT IN VEHICLE INTERFERED WITH DRIVER 004 PED INV PEDESTRIAN INVOLVED (NON-PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENT) 005 SUB-PED "SUB-PED": PEDESTRIAN INJURED SUBSEQUENT TO COLLISION, ETC. 006 BIKE INV TRICYCLE-BICYCLE INVOLVED 007 HITCHIKR HITCHHIKER (SOLICITING A RIDE) 008 PSNGR TOW PASSENGER BEING TOWED OR PUSHED ON CONVEYANCE 009 ON/OFF V GETTING ON OR OFF STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE (OCCUPANTS ONLY) 010 SUB OTRN OVERTURNED AFTER FIRST HARMFUL EVENT 011 MV PUSHD VEHICLE BEING PUSHED 012 MV TOWED VEHICLE TOWED OR HAD BEEN TOWING ANOTHER VEHICLE 013 FORCED VEHICLE FORCED BY IMPACT INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE, PEDALCYCLIST OR PEDESTRIAN 014 SET MOTN VEHICLE SET IN MOTION BY NON-DRIVER (CHILD RELEASED BRAKES, ETC.) 015 RR ROW AT OR ON RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY (NOT LIGHT RAIL) 016 LT RL ROW AT OR ON LIGHT-RAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY 017 RR HIT V TRAIN STRUCK VEHICLE 018 V HIT RR VEHICLE STRUCK TRAIN 019 HIT RR CAR VEHICLE STRUCK RAILROAD CAR ON ROADWAY 020 JACKNIFE JACKKNIFE; TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE STRUCK TOWING VEHICLE 021 TRL OTRN TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE OVERTURNED 022 CN BROKE TRAILER CONNECTION BROKE 023 DETACH TRL DETACHED TRAILING OBJECT STRUCK OTHER VEHICLE, NON-MOTORIST, OR OBJECT 024 V DOOR OPN VEHICLE DOOR OPENED INTO ADJACENT TRAFFIC LANE 025 WHEELOFF WHEEL CAME OFF 026 HOOD UP HOOD FLEW UP 028 LOAD SHIFT LOST LOAD, LOAD MOVED OR SHIFTED 029 TIREFAIL TIRE FAILURE 030 PET PET: CAT, DOG AND SIMILAR 031 LVSTOCK STOCK: COW, CALF, BULL, STEER, SHEEP, ETC. 032 HORSE HORSE, MULE, OR DONKEY 033 HRSE&RID HORSE AND RIDER 034 GAME WILD ANIMAL, GAME (INCLUDES BIRDS; NOT DEER OR ELK) 035 DEER ELK DEER OR ELK, WAPITI 036 ANML VEH ANIMAL-DRAWN VEHICLE 037 CULVERT CULVERT, OPEN LOW OR HIGH MANHOLE 038 ATENUATN IMPACT ATTENUATOR 039 PK METER PARKING METER 040 CURB CURB (ALSO NARROW SIDEWALKS ON BRIDGES) 041 JIGGLE JIGGLE BARS OR TRAFFIC SNAKE FOR CHANNELIZATION 042 GDRL END LEADING EDGE OF GUARDRAIL 043 GARDRAIL GUARD RAIL (NOT METAL MEDIAN BARRIER) 044 BARRIER MEDIAN BARRIER (RAISED OR METAL) 045 WALL RETAINING WALL OR TUNNEL WALL 046 BR RAIL BRIDGE RAILING (ON BRIDGE AND APPROACH) 047 BR ABUT BRIDGE ABUTMENT (APPROACH ENDS) 048 BR COLMN BRIDGE PILLAR OR COLUMN (EVEN THOUGH STRUCK PROTECTIVE GUARD RAIL FIRST) 049 BR GIRDR BRIDGE GIRDER (HORIZONTAL STRUCTURE OVERHEAD) 050 ISLAND TRAFFIC RAISED ISLAND 051 GORE GORE 052 POLE UNK POLE - TYPE UNKNOWN 053 POLE UTL POLE - POWER OR TELEPHONE 054 ST LIGHT POLE - STREET LIGHT ONLY 055 TRF SGNL POLE - TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND PED SIGNAL ONLY 056 SGN BRDG POLE - SIGN BRIDGE 057 STOPSIGN STOP OR YIELD SIGN 058 0TH SIGN OTHER SIGN, INCLUDING STREET SIGNS 059 HYDRANT HYDRANT EVENT CODE TRANSLATION LIST EVENT SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 060 MARKER DELINEATOR OR MARKER (REFLECTOR POSTS) 061 MAILBOX MAILBOX 062 TREE TREE, STUMP OR SHRUBS 063 VEG OHED TREE BRANCH OR OTHER VEGETATION OVERHEAD, ETC. 064 WIRE/CBL WIRE OR CABLE ACROSS OR OVER THE ROAD 065 TEMP SGN TEMPORARY SIGN OR BARRICADE IN ROAD, ETC. 066 PERM SGN PERMANENT SIGN OR BARRICADE IN/OFF ROAD 067 SLIDE SLIDES, FALLEN OR FALLING ROCKS 068 FRGN OBJ FOREIGN OBSTRUCTION/DEBRIS IN ROAD (NOT GRAVEL) 069 EQP WORK EQUIPMENT WORKING IN/OFF ROAD 070 0TH EQP OTHER EQUIPMENT IN OR OFF ROAD (INCLUDES PARKED TRAILER, BOAT) 071 MAIN EQP WRECKER, STREET SWEEPER, SNOW PLOW OR SANDING EQUIPMENT 072 OTHER WALL ROCK, BRICK OR OTHER SOLID WALL 073 IRRGL PVMT SPEED BUMP, OTHER BUMP, POTHOLE OR PAVEMENT IRREGULARITY (PER PAR) 075 CAVE IN BRIDGE OR ROAD CAVE IN 076 HI WATER HIGH WATER 077 SNO BANK SNOW BANK 078 HOLE CHUCKHOLE IN ROAD, LOW OR HIGH SHOULDER AT PAVEMENT EDGE 079 DITCH CUT SLOPE OR DITCH EMBANKMENT 080 OBJ F MV STRUCK BY ROCK OR OTHER OBJECT SET IN MOTION BY OTHER VEHICLE (INCL. LOST LOADS) 081 FLY-OBJ STRUCK BY OTHER MOVING OR FLYING OBJECT 082 VEH HID VEHICLE OBSCURED VIEW 083 VEG HID VEGETATION OBSCURED VIEW 084 BLDG HID VIEW OBSCURED BY FENCE, SIGN, PHONE BOOTH, ETC. 085 WIND GUST WIND GUST 086 IMMERSED VEHICLE IMMERSED IN BODY OF WATER 087 FIRE/EXP FIRE OR EXPLOSION 088 FENC/BLD FENCE OR BUILDING, ETC. 089 OTH ACDT ACCIDENT RELATED TO ANOTHER SEPARATE ACCIDENT 090 TO 1 SIDE TWO-WAY TRAFFIC ON DIVIDED ROADWAY ALL ROUTED TO ONE SIDE 092 PHANTOM OTHER (PHANTOM) NON-CONTACT VEHICLE (ON PAR OR REPORT) 093 CELL-POL CELL PHONE (ON PAR OR DRIVER IN USE) 094 VIOL GDL TEENAGE DRIVER IN VIOLATION OF GRADUATED LICENSE PGM 095 GUY WIRE GUY WIRE 096 BERM BERM (EARTHEN OR GRAVEL MOUND) 097 GRAVEL GRAVEL IN ROADWAY 098 ABR EDGE ABRUPT EDGE 099 CELL-WTN CELL PHONE USE WITNESSED BY OTHER PARTICIPANT 100 UNK FIXD UNKNOWN TYPE OF FIXED OBJECT 101 OTHER OBJ OTHER OR UNKNOWN OBJECT, NOT FIXED 104 OUTSIDE V PASSENGER RIDING ON VEHICLE EXTERIOR 105 PEDAL PSGR PASSENGER RIDING ON PEDALCYCLE 106 MAN WHLCHR PEDESTRIAN IN NON-MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR 107 MTR WHLCHR PEDESTRIAN IN MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR 110 N-MTR NON-MOTORIST STRUCK VEHICLE 111 S CAR VS V STREET CAR/TROLLEY (ON RAILS AND/OR OVERHEAD WIRE SYSTEM) STRUCK VEHICLE 112 V VS S CAR VEHICLE STRUCK STREET CAR/TROLLEY (ON RAILS AND/OR OVERHEAD WIRE SYSTEM) 113 S CAR ROW AT OR ON STREET CAR/TROLLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY 114 RR EQUIP VEHICLE STRUCK RAILROAD EQUIPMENT (NOT TRAIN) ON TRACKS 120 WIRE BAR WIRE OR CABLE MEDIAN BARRIER 124 SLIPPERY SLIDING OR SWERVING DUE TO WET, ICY, SLIPPERY OR LOOSE SURFACE 125 SHLDR SHOULDER GAVE WAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION TRANSLATION LIST HIGHWAY COMPONENT TRANSLATION LIST FUNC CLASS DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION 01 RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE 0 MAINLINE STATE HIGHWAY 02 RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER 1 COUPLET 06 RURAL MINOR ARTERIAL 3 FRONTAGE ROAD 07 RURAL MAJOR COLLECTOR 6 CONNECTION 8 HIGHWAY - OTHER 08 RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR 09 RURAL LOCAL 11 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE 12 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER FREEWAYS AND EXP 14 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER 16 URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL 17 URBAN COLLECTOR 19 URBAN LOCAL 78 UNKNOWN RURAL SYSTEM 79 UNKNOWN RURAL NON-SYSTEM 98 UNKNOWN URBAN SYSTEM 99 UNKNOWN URBAN NON-SYSTEM INJURY SEVERITY CODE TRANSLATION LIST LIGHT CONDITION CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 1 KILL FATAL INJURY 0 UNK UNKNOWN 2 INJA INCAPACITATING INJURY - BLEEDING, BROKEN BONES 1 DAY DAYLIGHT 3 INJB NON-INCAPACITATING INJURY 2 DLIT DARKNESS - WITH STREET LIGHTS 4 INJC POSSIBLE INJURY - COMPLAINT OF PAIN 3 DARK DARKNESS - NO STREET LIGHTS 5 PRI DIED PRIOR TO CRASH 4 DAWN DAWN (TWILIGHT) 7 NO<5 NO INJURY - 0 TO 4 YEARS OF AGE 5 DUSK DUSK (TWILIGHT) MEDIAN TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST MILEAGE TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE LONG DESCRIPTION 0 NONE NO MEDIAN 0 REGULAR MILEAGE 1 RSDMD SOLID MEDIAN BARRIER T TEMPORARY 2 DIVMD EARTH, GRASS OR PAVED MEDIAN Y SPUR Z OVERLAPPING MOVEMENT TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST PARTICIPANT TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 0 UNK UNKNOWN 0 OCC UNKNOWN OCCUPANT TYPE 1 STRGHT STRAIGHT AHEAD 1 DRVR DRIVER 2 TURN-R TURNING RIGHT 2 PSNG PASSENGER 3 TURN-L TURNING LEFT 3 PED PEDESTRIAN 4 CONV PEDESTRIAN USING A PEDESTRIAN CONVEYA 4 U-TURN MAKING A U-TURN 5 PTOW PEDESTRIAN TOWING OR TRAILERING AN OB 5 BACK BACKING 6 BIKE PEDALCYCLIST 6 STOP STOPPED IN TRAFFIC 7 BTOW PEDALCYCLIST TOWING OR TRAILERING AN i 7 PRKD-P PARKED - PROPERLY 8 PRKD OCCUPANT OF A PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE 8 PRKD-I PARKED - IMPROPERLY 9 UNK UNKNOWN TYPE OF NON-MOTORIST PEDESTRIAN LOCATION CODE TRANSLATION LIST TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE CODE TRANSLATION LIST CODE LONG DESCRIPTION CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 00 AT INTERSECTION - NOT IN ROADWAY 000 NONE NO CONTROL 01 AT INTERSECTION - INSIDE CROSSWALK 001 TRF SIGNAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS 02 AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY, OUTSIDE CROSSWALK 002 FLASHBCN-R FLASHING BEACON - RED (STOP) 03 AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY, XWALK AVAIL UNKNWN 003 FLASHBCN-A FLASHING BEACON - AMBER (SLOW) 04 NOT AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY 004 STOP SIGN STOP SIGN 05 NOT AT INTERSECTION - ON SHOULDER 005 SLOW SIGN SLOW SIGN 06 NOT AT INTERSECTION - ON MEDIAN 006 REG-SIGN REGULATORY SIGN 07 NOT AT INTERSECTION - WITHIN TRAFFIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 007 YIELD YIELD SIGN 08 NOT AT INTERSECTION - IN BIKE PATH 008 WARNING WARNING SIGN 09 NOT-AT INTERSECTION - ON SIDEWALK 009 CURVE CURVE SIGN 10 OUTSIDE TRAFFICWAY BOUNDARIES 010 SCHL X-ING SCHOOL CROSSING SIGN OR SPECIAL SIGNAL 15 NOT AT INTERSECTION - INSIDE MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK 011 OFCR/FLAG POLICE OFFICER, FLAGMAN - SCHOOL PATROL 18 OTHER, NOT IN ROADWAY 012 BRDG-GATE BRIDGE GATE - BARRIER 99 UNKNOWN LOCATION 013 TEMP-BARR TEMPORARY BARRIER 014 NO-PASS-ZN NO PASSING ZONE 015 ONE-WAY ONE-WAY STREET 016 CHANNEL CHANNELIZATION 017 MEDIAN BAR MEDIAN BARRIER 018 PILOT CAR PILOT CAR ROAD CHARACTER CODE TRANSLATION LIST 019 SP PED SIG SPECIAL PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL 020 X-BUCK CROSSBUCK SHORT 021 THR-GN-SIG THROUGH GREEN ARROW OR SIGNAL CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 022 L-GRN-SIG LEFT TURN GREEN ARROW, LANE MARKINGS, OR SIGNAL 0 UNK UNKNOWN 023 R-GRN-SIG RIGHT TURN GREEN ARROW, LANE MARKINGS, OR SIGNAL 1 INTER INTERSECTION 024 WIGWAG WIGWAG OR FLASHING LIGHTS W/O DROP-ARM GATE 2 ALLEY DRIVEWAY OR ALLEY 025 X-BUCK WRN CROSSBUCK AND ADVANCE WARNING 026 WW W/ GATE FLASHING LIGHTS WITH DROP-ARM GATES 3 STRGHT STRAIGHT ROADWAY 027 OVRHD SGNL SUPPLEMENTAL OVERHEAD SIGNAL (RR XING ONLY) 4 TRANS TRANSITION 028 SP RR STOP SPECIAL RR STOP SIGN 5 CURVE CURVE (HORIZONTAL CURVE) 029 ILUM GRD X ILLUMINATED GRADE CROSSING 6 OPENAC OPEN ACCESS OR TURNOUT 037 RAMP METER METERED RAMPS 7 GRADE GRADE (VERTICAL CURVE) 038 RUMBLE STR RUMBLE STRIP 8 BRIDGE BRIDGE STRUCTURE 090 L-TURN REF LEFT TURN REFUGE (WHEN REFUGE IS INVOLVED) 9 TUNNEL TUNNEL 091 R-TURN ALL RIGHT TURN AT ALL TIMES SIGN, ETC. 092 EMR SGN/FL EMERGENCY SIGNS OR FLARES 093 ACCEL LANE ACCELERATION OR DECELERATION LANES 094 R-TURN PRO RIGHT TURN PROHIBITED ON RED AFTER STOPPING 095 BUS STPSGN BUS STOP SIGN AND RED LIGHTS 099 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN OR NOT DEFINITE VEHICLE TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST WEATHER CONDITION CODE TRANSLATION LIST CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 01 PSNGR CAR PASSENGER CAR, PICKUP, ETC. 0 UNK UNKNOWN 02 BOBTAIL TRUCK TRACTOR WITH NO TRAILERS (BOBTAIL) 1 CLR CLEAR 03 FARM TRCTR FARM TRACTOR OR SELF-PROPELLED FARM EQUIPMENT 2 CLD CLOUDY 04 SEMI TOW TRUCK TRACTOR WITH TRAILER/MOBILE HOME IN TOW 3 RAIN RAIN 05 TRUCK TRUCK WITH NON-DETACHABLE BED, PANEL, ETC. 4 SLT SLEET 06 MOPED MOPED, MINIBIKE, MOTOR SCOOTER, OR MOTOR BICYCLE 5 FOG FOG 07 SCHL BUS SCHOOL BUS (INCLUDES VAN) 6 SNOW SNOW 08 0TH BUS OTHER BUS 7 DUST DUST 09 MTRCYCLE MOTORCYCLE 8 SMOK SMOKE 10 OTHER OTHER: FORKLIFT, BACKHOE, ETC. 9 ASH ASH 11 MOTRHOME MOTORHOME 12 TROLLEY MOTORIZED STREET CAR/TROLLEY (NO RAILS/WIRES) 13 ATV ATV 14 MTRSCTR MOTORIZED SCOOTER 15 SNOWMOBILE SNOWMOBILE 99 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN VEHICLE TYPE CDS150 07/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION-CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE SW Dartmouth Street from OR 99W to SW 72nd Avenue(excluding ending intersections) January 1,2007 through December 31,2011 NON- PROPERTY INTER- FATAL FATAL DAMAGE TOTAL PEOPLE PEOPLE DRY WET INTER- SECTION OFF- COLLISION TYPE CRASHES CRASHES ONLY CRASHES KILLED INJURED TRUCKS SURF SURF DAY DARK SECTION RELATED ROAD YEAR: 2011 SIDESWIPE-OVERTAKING 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2011 TOTAL 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 YEAR: 2010 REAR-END 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 SIDESWIPE-OVERTAKING 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2010 TOTAL 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 YEAR: 2009 REAR-END 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2009 TOTAL 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 YEAR: 2007 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2007 TOTAL 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 FINAL TOTAL 0 3 5 8 0 3 0 7 1 8 0 0 2 0 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes are reported for the 2011 data file compared to previous years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY SW Dartmouth Street from OR 99W to SW 72nd Avenue (excluding ending intersections) January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW INT-TYP SPCL USE E AUCO DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFF-RD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST DCSLK TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 01333 N N N 03/12/2011 17 SW DARTMOUTH ST ALLEY N N CLD S-OTHER 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NONE Sat 435 SW 72ND AVE W (NONE) STOP SIGN N DRY TURN PRVTE N S 000 00 12P 07 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 49 M OR-Y 026 000 07 (04) OR<25 02 NONE 0 TURN-R PRVTE N W 013 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 45 M OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 45 F 000 000 00 03 PSNG NO<5 04 F 000 000 00 06845 NNNNN 12/29/2009 16 SW DARTMOUTH ST ALLEY N N SNOW ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02 CITY Tue 500 SW 72ND AVE W (NONE) UNKNOWN N SNO TURN PRVTE N E 018 00 2P 07 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 45 M OR-Y 000 000 00 (04) OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE E W 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 79 M OR-Y 028 000 02 OR<25 00472 N N N 01/29/2010 17 SW DARTMOUTH ST STRGHT N N CLR S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 13 NONE Fri 300 SW 72ND AVE W (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY SS-0 PRVTE W E 000 00 2P 08 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 35 M OR-Y 045,028 000 13,02 (04) OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE W E 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 00656 N N N 02/05/2011 17 SW DARTMOUTH ST CURVE N N CLR S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 13,02 NONE Sat 150 SW PACIFIC HY 99W SE (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY SS-0 PRVTE SE NW 000 00 1P 08 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 39 F OR-Y 045,028 000 13,02 (04) OR<25 02 PSNG NO<5 01 M 000 000 00 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE SE NW 000 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 17 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 00015 Y N N 01/01/2010 17 SW DARTMOUTH ST STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 01 NO RPT Fri 20 SW PACIFIC HY 99W S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE S N 000 00 2P 06 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 23 F OR-Y 047,026 000 01 (02) OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S N 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 52 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 CDS380 7/19/2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 2 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY SW Dartmouth Street from OR 99W to SW 72nd Avenue (excluding ending intersections) January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2011 S D P RSW INT-TYP SPCL USE E AUCO DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFF-RD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S SER# ELGHR DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED INVEST DCSLK TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 04596 N N N 08/10/2007 17 SW DARTMOUTH ST ALLEY N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 9 STRGHT 02 NONE Fri 25 SW PACIFIC HY 99W S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY TURN PRVTE S N 000 00 4P 06 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 000 000 00 (02) OR<25 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE W N 018 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 21 M OR-Y 028 000 02 OR<25 04470 N N N 09/10/2009 17 SW DARTMOUTH ST STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07 NO RPT Thu 200 SW PACIFIC HY 99W S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE S N 000 00 2P 08 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 63 F OR-Y 026 000 07 (02) OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S N 011 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 55 F OR-Y 000 000 00 OR<25 06447 N N N 10/27/2007 17 SW DARTMOUTH ST ALLEY N N CLR 0-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02 NO RPT Sat 350 SW PACIFIC HY 99W S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY TURN PRVTE S N 000 00 1P 08 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 19 M OR-Y 000 000 00 (04) OR>25 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE N E 019 00 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 M OR-Y 004,028 000 02 OR<25 ACTION CODE TRANSLATION LIST ACTION SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 000 NONE NO ACTION OR NON-WARRANTED 001 SKIDDED SKIDDED 002 ON/OFF V GETTING ON OR OFF STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE 003 LOAD OVR OVERHANGING LOAD STRUCK ANOTHER VEHICLE, ETC. 006 SLOW DN SLOWED DOWN 007 AVOIDING AVOIDING MANEUVER 008 PAR PARK PARALLEL PARKING 009 ANG PARK ANGLE PARKING 010 INTERFERE PASSENGER INTERFERING WITH DRIVER 011 STOPPED STOPPED IN TRAFFIC NOT WAITING TO MAKE A LEFT TURN 012 STP/L TRN STOPPED BECAUSE OF LEFT TURN SIGNAL OR WAITING, ETC. 013 STP TURN STOPPED WHILE EXECUTING A TURN 015 GO A/STOP PROCEED AFTER STOPPING FOR A STOP SIGN/FLASHING RED. 016 TRN A/RED TURNED ON RED AFTER STOPPING 017 LOSTCTRL LOST CONTROL OF VEHICLE 018 EXIT DWY ENTERING STREET OR HIGHWAY FROM ALLEY OR DRIVEWAY 019 ENTR DWY ENTERING ALLEY OR DRIVEWAY FROM STREET OR HIGHWAY 020 STR ENTR BEFORE ENTERING ROADWAY, STRUCK PEDESTRIAN, ETC. ON SIDEWALK OR SHOULDER 021 NO DRVR CAR RAN AWAY - NO DRIVER 022 PREV COL STRUCK, OR WAS STRUCK BY, VEHICLE OR PEDESTRIAN IN PRIOR COLLISION BEFORE ACC. STABILIZED 023 STALLED VEHICLE STALLED 024 DRVR DEAD DEAD BY UNASSOCIATED CAUSE 025 FATIGUE FATIGUED, SLEEPY, ASLEEP 026 SUN DRIVER BLINDED BY SUN 027 HDLGHTS DRIVER BLINDED BY HEADLIGHTS 028 ILLNESS PHYSICALLY ILL 029 THRU MED VEHICLE CROSSED, PLUNGED OVER, OR THROUGH MEDIAN BARRIER 030 PURSUIT PURSUING OR ATTEMPTING TO STOP ANOTHER VEHICLE 031 PASSING PASSING SITUATION 032 PRKOFFRD VEHICLE PARKED BEYOND CURB OR SHOULDER 033 CROS MED VEHICLE CROSSED EARTH OR GRASS MEDIAN 034 X N/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - NO TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 035 X W/ SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 036 DIAGONAL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - DIAGONALLY 037 BTWN INT CROSSING BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS 038 DISTRACT DRIVER'S ATTENTION DISTRACTED 039 W/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER WITH TRAFFIC 040 A/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER FACING TRAFFIC 041 W/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT WITH TRAFFIC 042 A/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT FACING TRAFFIC 043 PLAYINRD PLAYING IN STREET OR ROAD 044 PUSH MV PUSHING OR WORKING ON VEHICLE IN ROAD OR ON SHOULDER 045 WORK ON WORKING IN ROADWAY OR ALONG SHOULDER 050 LAY ON RD STANDING OR LYING IN ROADWAY 051 ENT OFFRD ENTERING / STARTING IN TRAFFIC LANE FROM OFF-ROAD 088 OTHER OTHER ACTION 099 UNK UNKNOWN ACTION CAUSE CODE TRANSLATION LIST COLLISION TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST CAUSE SHORT COLL SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 00 NO CODE NO CAUSE ASSOCIATED AT THIS LEVEL & 0TH MISCELLANEOUS 01 TOO-FAST TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS (NOT EXCEED POSTED SPEED - BACK BACKING 02 NO-YIELD DID NOT YIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 PED PEDESTRIAN 03 PAS-STOP PASSED STOP SIGN OR RED FLASHER 1 ANGL ANGLE 04 DIS--RAG DISREGARDED R-A-G TRAFFIC SIGNAL. 2 HEAD HEAD-ON 05 LEFT-CTR DROVE LEFT OF CENTER ON TWO-WAY ROAD 3 REAR REAR-END 06 IMP-OVER IMPROPER OVERTAKING 4 SS-M SIDESWIPE - MEETING 07 TOO-CLOS FOLLOWED TOO CLOSELY 5 SS-0 SIDESWIPE - OVERTAKING 08 IMP-TURN MADE IMPROPER TURN 6 TURN TURNING MOVEMENT 09 DRINKING ALCOHOL OR DRUG INVOLVED 7 PARK PARKING MANEUVER 10 OTHR-IMP OTHER IMPROPER DRIVING 8 NCOL NON-COLLISION 11 MECH-DEF MECHANICAL DEFECT 9 FIX FIXED OBJECT OR OTHER OBJECT 12 OTHER OTHER (NOT IMPROPER DRIVING) 13 IMP LN C IMPROPER CHANGE OF TRAFFIC LANES 14 DIS TCD DISREGARDED OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE 15 WRNG WAY WRONG WAY ON ONE-WAY ROADWAY 16 FATIGUE DRIVER DROWSY/FATIGUED/SLEEPY 18 IN RDWY NON-MOTORIST ILLEGALLY IN ROADWAY 19 NT VISBL NON-MOTORIST CLOTHING NOT VISIBLE 20 IMP PKNG VEHICLE IMPROPERLY PARKED 21 DEF STER DEFECTIVE STEERING MECHANISM CRASH TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST 22 DEF BRKE INADEQUATE OR NO BRAKES 24 LOADSHFT VEHICLE LOST LOAD OR LOAD SHIFTED CRASH SHORT 25 TIREFAIL TIRE FAILURE TYPE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 26 PHANTOM PHANTOM / NON-CONTACT VEHICLE & OVERTURN OVERTURNED 27 INATTENT INATTENTION 0 NON-COLL OTHER NON-COLLISION 30 SPEED DRIVING IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED 1 0TH RDWY MOTOR VEHICLE ON OTHER ROADWAY 31 RACING SPEED RACING (PER PAR) 2 PRKD MV PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE 32 CARELESS CARELESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 3 PED PEDESTRIAN 33 RECKLESS RECKLESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 4 TRAIN RAILWAY TRAIN 34 AGGRESV AGGRESSIVE DRIVING (PER PAR) 6 BIKE PEDALCYCLIST 35 RD RAGE ROAD RAGE (PER PAR) 7 ANIMAL ANIMAL 8 FIX OBJ FIXED OBJECT 9 OTH OBJ OTHER OBJECT A ANGL-STP ENTERING AT ANGLE - ONE VEHICLE STOPPED B ANGL-OTH ENTERING AT ANGLE - ALL OTHERS C S-STRGHT FROM SAME DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT D S-1TURN FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT E S-1STOP FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED F S-OTHER FROM SAME DIRECTION-ALL OTHERS, INCLUDING PARKING G O-STRGHT FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT H 0-1TURN FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT I 0-1STOP FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED J 0-OTHER FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION-ALL OTHERS INCL. PARKING DRIVER LICENSE CODE TRANSLATION LIST DRIVER RESIDENCE CODE TRANSLATION LIST LIC SHORT RES SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 0 NONE NOT LICENSED (HAD NEVER BEEN LICENSED) 1 OR<25 OREGON RESIDENT WITHIN 25 MILE OF HOME 1 OR-Y VALID OREGON LICENSE 2 OR>25 OREGON RESIDENT 25 OR MORE MILES FROM HOME 2 OTH-Y VALID LICENSE, OTHER STATE OR COUNTRY 3 OR-? OREGON RESIDENT - UNKNOWN DISTANCE FROM HOME 4 N-RES NON-RESIDENT 3 SUSP SUSPENDED/REVOKED 9 UNK UNKNOWN IF OREGON RESIDENT ERROR CODE TRANSLATION LIST ERROR SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION 000 NONE NO ERROR 001 WIDE TRN WIDE TURN 002 CUT CORN CUT CORNER ON TURN 003 FAIL TRN FAILED TO OBEY MANDATORY TRAFFIC TURN SIGNAL, SIGN OR LANE MARKINGS 004 L IN TRF LEFT TURN IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC 005 L PROHIB LEFT TURN WHERE PROHIBITED 006 FRM WRNG TURNED FROM WRONG LANE 007 TO WRONG TURNED INTO WRONG LANE 008 ILLEG U U-TURNED ILLEGALLY 009 IMP STOP IMPROPERLY STOPPED IN TRAFFIC LANE 010 IMP SIG IMPROPER SIGNAL OR FAILURE TO SIGNAL 011 IMP BACK BACKING IMPROPERLY (NOT PARKING) 012 IMP PARK IMPROPERLY PARKED 013 UNPARK IMPROPER START LEAVING PARKED POSITION 014 IMP STRT IMPROPER START FROM STOPPED POSITION 015 IMP LGHT IMPROPER OR NO LIGHTS (VEHICLE IN TRAFFIC) 016 INATTENT FAILED TO DIM LIGHTS (UNTIL 4/1/97) / INATTENTION (AFTER 4/1/97) 017 UNSF VEH DRIVING UNSAFE VEHICLE (NO OTHER ERROR APPARENT) 018 OTH PARK ENTERING/EXITING PARKED POSITION W/ INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE; OTHER IMPROPER PARKING MANEUVER 019 DIS DRIV DISREGARDED OTHER DRIVER'S SIGNAL 020 DIS SGNL DISREGARDED TRAFFIC SIGNAL 021 RAN STOP DISREGARDED STOP SIGN OR FLASHING RED 022 DIS SIGN DISREGARDED WARNING SIGN, FLARES OR FLASHING AMBER 023 DIS OFCR DISREGARDED POLICE OFFICER OR FLAGMAN 024 DIS EMER DISREGARDED SIREN OR WARNING OF EMERGENCY VEHICLE 025 DIS RR DISREGARDED RR SIGNAL, RR SIGN, OR RR FLAGMAN 026 REAR-END FAILED TO AVOID STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE AHEAD OTHER THAN SCHOOL BUS 027 BIKE ROW DID NOT HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY OVER PEDALCYCLIST 028 NO ROW DID NOT HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY 029 PED ROW FAILED TO YIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO PEDESTRIAN 030 PAS CURV PASSING ON A CURVE 031 PAS WRNG PASSING ON THE WRONG SIDE 032 PAS TANG PASSING ON STRAIGHT ROAD UNDER UNSAFE CONDITIONS 033 PAS X-WK PASSED VEHICLE STOPPED AT CROSSWALK FOR PEDESTRIAN 034 PAS INTR PASSING AT INTERSECTION 035 PAS HILL PASSING ON CREST OF HILL 036 N/PAS ZN PASSING IN "NO PASSING" ZONE 037 PAS TRAF PASSING IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC 038 CUT-IN CUTTING IN (TWO LANES - TWO WAY ONLY) 039 WRNGSIDE DRIVING ON WRONG SIDE OF THE ROAD 040 THRU MED DRIVING THROUGH SAFETY ZONE OR OVER ISLAND 041 F/ST BUS FAILED TO STOP FOR SCHOOL BUS ERROR CODE TRANSLATION LIST ERROR SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION 042 F/SLO MV FAILED TO DECREASE SPEED FOR SLOWER MOVING VEHICLE 043 TO CLOSE FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY (MUST BE ON OFFICER'S REPORT) 044 STRDL LN STRADDLING OR DRIVING ON WRONG LANES 045 IMP CHG IMPROPER CHANGE OF TRAFFIC LANES 046 WRNG WAY WRONG WAY ON ONE-WAY ROADWAY (DELIBERATELY TRAVELING ON WRONG SIDE) 047 BASCRULE DRIVING TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS (NOT EXCEEDING POSTED SPEED) 048 OPN DOOR OPENED DOOR INTO ADJACENT TRAFFIC LANE 049 IMPEDING IMPEDING TRAFFIC 050 SPEED DRIVING IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED 051 RECKLESS RECKLESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 052 CARELESS CARELESS DRIVING (PER PAR) 053 RACING SPEED RACING (PER PAR) 054 X N/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION, NO TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 055 X W/SGNL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION, TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT 056 DIAGONAL CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - DIAGONALLY 057 BTWN INT CROSSING BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS 059 W/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER WITH TRAFFIC 060 A/TRAF-S WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER FACING TRAFFIC 061 W/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT WITH TRAFFIC 062 A/TRAF-P WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT FACING TRAFFIC 063 PLAYINRD PLAYING IN STREET OR ROAD 064 PUSH MV PUSHING OR WORKING ON VEHICLE IN ROAD OR ON SHOULDER 065 WK IN RD WORKING IN ROADWAY OR ALONG SHOULDER 070 LAYON RD STANDING OR LYING IN ROADWAY 073 ELUDING ELUDING 080 FAIL LN FAILED TO MAINTAIN LANE 081 OFF RD RAN OFF ROAD 082 NO CLEAR DRIVER MISJUDGED CLEARANCE 083 OVRSTEER OVERCORRECTING 084 NOT USED CODE NOT IN USE 085 OVRLOAD OVERLOADING OR IMPROPER LOADING OF VEHICLE WITH CARGO OR PASSENGERS 097 UNA DIS TC UNABLE TO DETERMINE WHICH DRIVER DISREGARDED TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE EVENT CODE TRANSLATION LIST EVENT SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 001 FEL/JUMP OCCUPANT FELL, JUMPED OR WAS EJECTED FROM MOVING VEHICLE 002 INTERFER PASSENGER INTERFERED WITH DRIVER 003 BUG INTF ANIMAL OR INSECT IN VEHICLE INTERFERED WITH DRIVER 004 PED INV PEDESTRIAN INVOLVED (NON-PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENT) 005 SUB-PED "SUB-PED": PEDESTRIAN INJURED SUBSEQUENT TO COLLISION, ETC. 006 BIKE INV TRICYCLE-BICYCLE INVOLVED 007 HITCHIKR HITCHHIKER (SOLICITING A RIDE) 008 PSNGR TOW PASSENGER BEING TOWED OR PUSHED ON CONVEYANCE 009 ON/OFF V GETTING ON OR OFF STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE (OCCUPANTS ONLY) 010 SUB OTRN OVERTURNED AFTER FIRST HARMFUL EVENT 011 MV PUSHD VEHICLE BEING PUSHED 012 MV TOWED VEHICLE TOWED OR HAD BEEN TOWING ANOTHER VEHICLE 013 FORCED VEHICLE FORCED BY IMPACT INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE, PEDALCYCLIST OR PEDESTRIAN 014 SET MOTN VEHICLE SET IN MOTION BY NON-DRIVER (CHILD RELEASED BRAKES, ETC.) 015 RR ROW AT OR ON RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY (NOT LIGHT RAIL) 016 LT RL ROW AT OR ON LIGHT-RAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY 017 RR HIT V TRAIN STRUCK VEHICLE 018 V HIT RR VEHICLE STRUCK TRAIN 019 HIT RR CAR VEHICLE STRUCK RAILROAD CAR ON ROADWAY 020 JACKNIFE JACKKNIFE; TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE STRUCK TOWING VEHICLE 021 TRL OTRN TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE OVERTURNED 022 CN BROKE TRAILER CONNECTION BROKE 023 DETACH TRL DETACHED TRAILING OBJECT STRUCK OTHER VEHICLE, NON-MOTORIST, OR OBJECT 024 V DOOR OPN VEHICLE DOOR OPENED INTO ADJACENT TRAFFIC LANE 025 WHEELOFF WHEEL CAME OFF 026 HOOD UP HOOD FLEW UP 028 LOAD SHIFT LOST LOAD, LOAD MOVED OR SHIFTED 029 TIREFAIL TIRE FAILURE 030 PET PET: CAT, DOG AND SIMILAR 031 LVSTOCK STOCK: COW, CALF, BULL, STEER, SHEEP, ETC. 032 HORSE HORSE, MULE, OR DONKEY 033 HRSE&RID HORSE AND RIDER 034 GAME WILD ANIMAL, GAME (INCLUDES BIRDS; NOT DEER OR ELK) 035 DEER ELK DEER OR ELK, WAPITI 036 ANML VEH ANIMAL-DRAWN VEHICLE 037 CULVERT CULVERT, OPEN LOW OR HIGH MANHOLE 038 ATENUATN IMPACT ATTENUATOR 039 PK METER PARKING METER 040 CURB CURB (ALSO NARROW SIDEWALKS ON BRIDGES) 041 JIGGLE JIGGLE BARS OR TRAFFIC SNAKE FOR CHANNELIZATION 042 GDRL END LEADING EDGE OF GUARDRAIL 043 GARDRAIL GUARD RAIL (NOT METAL MEDIAN BARRIER) 044 BARRIER MEDIAN BARRIER (RAISED OR METAL) 045 WALL RETAINING WALL OR TUNNEL WALL 046 BR RAIL BRIDGE RAILING (ON BRIDGE AND APPROACH) 047 BR ABUT BRIDGE ABUTMENT (APPROACH ENDS) 048 BR COLMN BRIDGE PILLAR OR COLUMN (EVEN THOUGH STRUCK PROTECTIVE GUARD RAIL FIRST) 049 BR GIRDR BRIDGE GIRDER (HORIZONTAL STRUCTURE OVERHEAD) 050 ISLAND TRAFFIC RAISED ISLAND 051 GORE GORE 052 POLE UNK POLE - TYPE UNKNOWN 053 POLE UTL POLE - POWER OR TELEPHONE 054 ST LIGHT POLE - STREET LIGHT ONLY 055 TRF SGNL POLE - TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND PED SIGNAL ONLY 056 SGN BRDG POLE - SIGN BRIDGE 057 STOPSIGN STOP OR YIELD SIGN 058 0TH SIGN OTHER SIGN, INCLUDING STREET SIGNS 059 HYDRANT HYDRANT EVENT CODE TRANSLATION LIST EVENT SHORT CODE DESCRIPTION LONG DESCRIPTION 060 MARKER DELINEATOR OR MARKER (REFLECTOR POSTS) 061 MAILBOX MAILBOX 062 TREE TREE, STUMP OR SHRUBS 063 VEG OHED TREE BRANCH OR OTHER VEGETATION OVERHEAD, ETC. 064 WIRE/CBL WIRE OR CABLE ACROSS OR OVER THE ROAD 065 TEMP SGN TEMPORARY SIGN OR BARRICADE IN ROAD, ETC. 066 PERM SGN PERMANENT SIGN OR BARRICADE IN/OFF ROAD 067 SLIDE SLIDES, FALLEN OR FALLING ROCKS 068 FRGN OBJ FOREIGN OBSTRUCTION/DEBRIS IN ROAD (NOT GRAVEL) 069 EQP WORK EQUIPMENT WORKING IN/OFF ROAD 070 0TH EQP OTHER EQUIPMENT IN OR OFF ROAD (INCLUDES PARKED TRAILER, BOAT) 071 MAIN EQP WRECKER, STREET SWEEPER, SNOW PLOW OR SANDING EQUIPMENT 072 OTHER WALL ROCK, BRICK OR OTHER SOLID WALL 073 IRRGL PVMT SPEED BUMP, OTHER BUMP, POTHOLE OR PAVEMENT IRREGULARITY (PER PAR) 075 CAVE IN BRIDGE OR ROAD CAVE IN 076 HI WATER HIGH WATER 077 SNO BANK SNOW BANK 078 HOLE CHUCKHOLE IN ROAD, LOW OR HIGH SHOULDER AT PAVEMENT EDGE 079 DITCH CUT SLOPE OR DITCH EMBANKMENT 080 OBJ F MV STRUCK BY ROCK OR OTHER OBJECT SET IN MOTION BY OTHER VEHICLE (INCL. LOST LOADS) 081 FLY-OBJ STRUCK BY OTHER MOVING OR FLYING OBJECT 082 VEH HID VEHICLE OBSCURED VIEW 083 VEG HID VEGETATION OBSCURED VIEW 084 BLDG HID VIEW OBSCURED BY FENCE, SIGN, PHONE BOOTH, ETC. 085 WIND GUST WIND GUST 086 IMMERSED VEHICLE IMMERSED IN BODY OF WATER 087 FIRE/EXP FIRE OR EXPLOSION 088 FENC/BLD FENCE OR BUILDING, ETC. 089 OTH ACDT ACCIDENT RELATED TO ANOTHER SEPARATE ACCIDENT 090 TO 1 SIDE TWO-WAY TRAFFIC ON DIVIDED ROADWAY ALL ROUTED TO ONE SIDE 092 PHANTOM OTHER (PHANTOM) NON-CONTACT VEHICLE (ON PAR OR REPORT) 093 CELL-POL CELL PHONE (ON PAR OR DRIVER IN USE) 094 VIOL GDL TEENAGE DRIVER IN VIOLATION OF GRADUATED LICENSE PGM 095 GUY WIRE GUY WIRE 096 BERM BERM (EARTHEN OR GRAVEL MOUND) 097 GRAVEL GRAVEL IN ROADWAY 098 ABR EDGE ABRUPT EDGE 099 CELL-WTN CELL PHONE USE WITNESSED BY OTHER PARTICIPANT 100 UNK FIXD UNKNOWN TYPE OF FIXED OBJECT 101 OTHER OBJ OTHER OR UNKNOWN OBJECT, NOT FIXED 104 OUTSIDE V PASSENGER RIDING ON VEHICLE EXTERIOR 105 PEDAL PSGR PASSENGER RIDING ON PEDALCYCLE 106 MAN WHLCHR PEDESTRIAN IN NON-MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR 107 MTR WHLCHR PEDESTRIAN IN MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR 110 N-MTR NON-MOTORIST STRUCK VEHICLE 111 S CAR VS V STREET CAR/TROLLEY (ON RAILS AND/OR OVERHEAD WIRE SYSTEM) STRUCK VEHICLE 112 V VS S CAR VEHICLE STRUCK STREET CAR/TROLLEY (ON RAILS AND/OR OVERHEAD WIRE SYSTEM) 113 S CAR ROW AT OR ON STREET CAR/TROLLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY 114 RR EQUIP VEHICLE STRUCK RAILROAD EQUIPMENT (NOT TRAIN) ON TRACKS 120 WIRE BAR WIRE OR CABLE MEDIAN BARRIER 124 SLIPPERY SLIDING OR SWERVING DUE TO WET, ICY, SLIPPERY OR LOOSE SURFACE 125 SHLDR SHOULDER GAVE WAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION TRANSLATION LIST HIGHWAY COMPONENT TRANSLATION LIST FUNC CLASS DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION 01 RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE 0 MAINLINE STATE HIGHWAY 02 RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER 1 COUPLET 06 RURAL MINOR ARTERIAL 3 FRONTAGE ROAD 07 RURAL MAJOR COLLECTOR 6 CONNECTION 8 HIGHWAY - OTHER 08 RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR 09 RURAL LOCAL 11 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE 12 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER FREEWAYS AND EXP 14 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER 16 URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL 17 URBAN COLLECTOR 19 URBAN LOCAL 78 UNKNOWN RURAL SYSTEM 79 UNKNOWN RURAL NON-SYSTEM 98 UNKNOWN URBAN SYSTEM 99 UNKNOWN URBAN NON-SYSTEM INJURY SEVERITY CODE TRANSLATION LIST LIGHT CONDITION CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 1 KILL FATAL INJURY 0 UNK UNKNOWN 2 INJA INCAPACITATING INJURY - BLEEDING, BROKEN BONES 1 DAY DAYLIGHT 3 INJB NON-INCAPACITATING INJURY 2 DLIT DARKNESS - WITH STREET LIGHTS 4 INJC POSSIBLE INJURY - COMPLAINT OF PAIN 3 DARK DARKNESS - NO STREET LIGHTS 5 PRI DIED PRIOR TO CRASH 4 DAWN DAWN (TWILIGHT) 7 NO<5 NO INJURY - 0 TO 4 YEARS OF AGE 5 DUSK DUSK (TWILIGHT) MEDIAN TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST MILEAGE TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE LONG DESCRIPTION 0 NONE NO MEDIAN 0 REGULAR MILEAGE 1 RSDMD SOLID MEDIAN BARRIER T TEMPORARY 2 DIVMD EARTH, GRASS OR PAVED MEDIAN Y SPUR Z OVERLAPPING MOVEMENT TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST PARTICIPANT TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST SHORT SHORT CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 0 UNK UNKNOWN 0 OCC UNKNOWN OCCUPANT TYPE 1 STRGHT STRAIGHT AHEAD 1 DRVR DRIVER 2 TURN-R TURNING RIGHT 2 PSNG PASSENGER 3 TURN-L TURNING LEFT 3 PED PEDESTRIAN 4 CONV PEDESTRIAN USING A PEDESTRIAN CONVEYA 4 U-TURN MAKING A U-TURN 5 PTOW PEDESTRIAN TOWING OR TRAILERING AN OB 5 BACK BACKING 6 BIKE PEDALCYCLIST 6 STOP STOPPED IN TRAFFIC 7 BTOW PEDALCYCLIST TOWING OR TRAILERING AN i 7 PRKD-P PARKED - PROPERLY 8 PRKD OCCUPANT OF A PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE 8 PRKD-I PARKED - IMPROPERLY 9 UNK UNKNOWN TYPE OF NON-MOTORIST PEDESTRIAN LOCATION CODE TRANSLATION LIST TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE CODE TRANSLATION LIST CODE LONG DESCRIPTION CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 00 AT INTERSECTION - NOT IN ROADWAY 000 NONE NO CONTROL 01 AT INTERSECTION - INSIDE CROSSWALK 001 TRF SIGNAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS 02 AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY, OUTSIDE CROSSWALK 002 FLASHBCN-R FLASHING BEACON - RED (STOP) 03 AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY, XWALK AVAIL UNKNWN 003 FLASHBCN-A FLASHING BEACON - AMBER (SLOW) 04 NOT AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY 004 STOP SIGN STOP SIGN 05 NOT AT INTERSECTION - ON SHOULDER 005 SLOW SIGN SLOW SIGN 06 NOT AT INTERSECTION - ON MEDIAN 006 REG-SIGN REGULATORY SIGN 07 NOT AT INTERSECTION - WITHIN TRAFFIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 007 YIELD YIELD SIGN 08 NOT AT INTERSECTION - IN BIKE PATH 008 WARNING WARNING SIGN 09 NOT-AT INTERSECTION - ON SIDEWALK 009 CURVE CURVE SIGN 10 OUTSIDE TRAFFICWAY BOUNDARIES 010 SCHL X-ING SCHOOL CROSSING SIGN OR SPECIAL SIGNAL 15 NOT AT INTERSECTION - INSIDE MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK 011 OFCR/FLAG POLICE OFFICER, FLAGMAN - SCHOOL PATROL 18 OTHER, NOT IN ROADWAY 012 BRDG-GATE BRIDGE GATE - BARRIER 99 UNKNOWN LOCATION 013 TEMP-BARR TEMPORARY BARRIER 014 NO-PASS-ZN NO PASSING ZONE 015 ONE-WAY ONE-WAY STREET 016 CHANNEL CHANNELIZATION 017 MEDIAN BAR MEDIAN BARRIER 018 PILOT CAR PILOT CAR ROAD CHARACTER CODE TRANSLATION LIST 019 SP PED SIG SPECIAL PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL 020 X-BUCK CROSSBUCK SHORT 021 THR-GN-SIG THROUGH GREEN ARROW OR SIGNAL CODE DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 022 L-GRN-SIG LEFT TURN GREEN ARROW, LANE MARKINGS, OR SIGNAL 0 UNK UNKNOWN 023 R-GRN-SIG RIGHT TURN GREEN ARROW, LANE MARKINGS, OR SIGNAL 1 INTER INTERSECTION 024 WIGWAG WIGWAG OR FLASHING LIGHTS W/O DROP-ARM GATE 2 ALLEY DRIVEWAY OR ALLEY 025 X-BUCK WRN CROSSBUCK AND ADVANCE WARNING 026 WW W/ GATE FLASHING LIGHTS WITH DROP-ARM GATES 3 STRGHT STRAIGHT ROADWAY 027 OVRHD SGNL SUPPLEMENTAL OVERHEAD SIGNAL (RR XING ONLY) 4 TRANS TRANSITION 028 SP RR STOP SPECIAL RR STOP SIGN 5 CURVE CURVE (HORIZONTAL CURVE) 029 ILUM GRD X ILLUMINATED GRADE CROSSING 6 OPENAC OPEN ACCESS OR TURNOUT 037 RAMP METER METERED RAMPS 7 GRADE GRADE (VERTICAL CURVE) 038 RUMBLE STR RUMBLE STRIP 8 BRIDGE BRIDGE STRUCTURE 090 L-TURN REF LEFT TURN REFUGE (WHEN REFUGE IS INVOLVED) 9 TUNNEL TUNNEL 091 R-TURN ALL RIGHT TURN AT ALL TIMES SIGN, ETC. 092 EMR SGN/FL EMERGENCY SIGNS OR FLARES 093 ACCEL LANE ACCELERATION OR DECELERATION LANES 094 R-TURN PRO RIGHT TURN PROHIBITED ON RED AFTER STOPPING 095 BUS STPSGN BUS STOP SIGN AND RED LIGHTS 099 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN OR NOT DEFINITE VEHICLE TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST WEATHER CONDITION CODE TRANSLATION LIST CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION CODE SHORT DESC LONG DESCRIPTION 01 PSNGR CAR PASSENGER CAR, PICKUP, ETC. 0 UNK UNKNOWN 02 BOBTAIL TRUCK TRACTOR WITH NO TRAILERS (BOBTAIL) 1 CLR CLEAR 03 FARM TRCTR FARM TRACTOR OR SELF-PROPELLED FARM EQUIPMENT 2 CLD CLOUDY 04 SEMI TOW TRUCK TRACTOR WITH TRAILER/MOBILE HOME IN TOW 3 RAIN RAIN 05 TRUCK TRUCK WITH NON-DETACHABLE BED, PANEL, ETC. 4 SLT SLEET 06 MOPED MOPED, MINIBIKE, MOTOR SCOOTER, OR MOTOR BICYCLE 5 FOG FOG 07 SCHL BUS SCHOOL BUS (INCLUDES VAN) 6 SNOW SNOW 08 0TH BUS OTHER BUS 7 DUST DUST 09 MTRCYCLE MOTORCYCLE 8 SMOK SMOKE 10 OTHER OTHER: FORKLIFT, BACKHOE, ETC. 9 ASH ASH 11 MOTRHOME MOTORHOME 12 TROLLEY MOTORIZED STREET CAR/TROLLEY (NO RAILS/WIRES) 13 ATV ATV 14 MTRSCTR MOTORIZED SCOOTER 15 SNOWMOBILE SNOWMOBILE 99 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN VEHICLE TYPE Appendix E 2014 Background Traffic LOS Worksheets HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1 : SW Pacific Hwy & Hwy 217 SB Ramps 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 r I 14 ii 4 r Volume(vph) 0 1523 241 54 1930 0 0 0 0 530 1 246 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3505 1511 1805 3539 1681 1686 1563 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3505 1511 1805 3539 1681 1686 1563 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow(vph) 0 1586 251 56 2010 0 0 0 0 552 1 256 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 1586 209 56 2010 0 0 0 0 276 277 242 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 1 8 8 1 1 1 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 5 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 2% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% Turn Type Perm Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 4 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 90.2 90.2 8.0 102.7 27.8 27.8 27.8 Effective Green,g(s) 90.7 90.7 8.5 103.2 28.8 28.8 28.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.65 0.06 0.74 0.21 0.21 0.21 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 4.8 4.8 2.5 4.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 2271 979 110 2609 346 347 322 v/s Ratio Prot 0.45 0.03 c0.57 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.21 0.51 0.77 0.80 0.80 0.75 Uniform Delay,dl 15.9 10.1 63.7 11.2 52.8 52.8 52.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.15 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.8 0.5 2.0 1.7 11.5 11.6 8.9 Delay(s) 17.7 10.6 75.3 8.3 64.4 64.4 61.2 Level of Service B B E A E E E Approach Delay(s) 16.7 10.1 0.0 63.4 Approach LOS B B A E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 21.8 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 124.9% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Background Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SW Pacific Hwy & Hwy 217 NB Ramps 7/31/2013 _ C 4- 4\ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 14 r +14 li r Volume(vph) 1707 346 0 2418 246 120 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 *0.89 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3505 1515 4974 1770 1615 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3505 1515 4974 1770 1615 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow(vph) 1797 364 0 2545 259 126 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 83 0 0 0 37 Lane Group Flow(vph) 1797 281 0 2545 259 89 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 6 6 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 6 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 0% 2% 2% 0% Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 2 8 Actuated Green,G(s) 108.1 108.1 108.1 22.4 22.4 Effective Green,g(s) 108.1 108.1 108.1 23.4 23.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.17 0.17 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 4.6 4.6 5.2 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 2706 1170 3841 296 270 v/s Ratio Prot c0.51 0.51 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.24 0.66 0.88 0.33 Uniform Delay,dl 7.5 4.5 7.4 56.9 51.4 Progression Factor 1.09 3.52 0.35 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.0 0.4 0.6 23.4 0.4 Delay(s) 9.1 16.1 3.2 80.3 51.8 Level of Service A B A F D Approach Delay(s) 10.3 3.2 70.9 Approach LOS B A E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Background Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW Pacific Hwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) 14 r "I '`'FT+ li 14 li 1+ Volume(vph) 83 1241 444 88 1727 11 542 208 93 141 115 37 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 3505 1576 1805 5080 3502 1794 1805 1795 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 3505 1576 1805 5080 3502 1794 1805 1795 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow(vph) 86 1293 462 92 1799 11 565 217 97 147 120 39 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 195 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 8 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 86 1293 267 92 1810 0 565 303 0 147 151 0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 2 1 1 2 8 8 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 3 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8% Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Split Split Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green,G(s) 10.9 80.5 80.5 14.0 83.6 16.5 16.5 11.5 11.5 Effective Green,g(s) 10.9 81.0 81.0 14.0 84.1 17.0 17.0 12.0 12.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.58 0.58 0.10 0.60 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.09 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension(s) 2.3 5.2 5.2 2.3 5.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 141 2028 912 181 3052 425 218 155 154 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.37 0.05 c0.36 0.16 c0.17 0.08 c0.08 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.64 0.29 0.51 0.59 1.33 1.39 0.95 0.98 Uniform Delay,dl 62.5 19.7 15.0 59.7 17.3 61.5 61.5 63.7 63.9 Progression Factor 0.88 1.19 4.37 0.91 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 4.4 1.2 0.6 1.0 0.7 163.7 200.3 56.1 65.4 Delay(s) 59.4 24.6 66.0 55.3 12.6 225.2 261.8 119.8 129.2 Level of Service E C E E B F F F F Approach Delay(s) 36.6 14.6 238.3 124.7 Approach LOS D B F F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 69.6 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Background Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SW Pacific Hwy & SW 72nd Ave 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) 14 r "I 141 li t r ) 1+ Volume(vph) 117 1257 71 181 1562 28 172 140 293 113 91 99 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.92 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 3505 1540 1787 5023 1787 1900 1559 1790 1729 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 3505 1540 1787 5023 364 1900 1559 1025 1729 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow(vph) 122 1309 74 189 1627 29 179 146 305 118 95 103 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 24 0 1 0 0 0 74 0 29 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 122 1309 50 189 1655 0 179 146 231 118 169 0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 3 9 9 3 18 18 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 3 2 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 1% 1% 3% 0% 1% 0% 2% 0% 1% 0% Turn Type Prot Perm Prot pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 8 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 19.4 68.9 68.9 21.6 71.1 34.9 20.2 41.8 28.1 16.8 Effective Green,g(s) 19.9 69.4 69.4 22.1 71.6 35.9 20.7 42.8 29.1 17.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.50 0.50 0.16 0.51 0.26 0.15 0.31 0.21 0.12 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 5.1 5.1 2.3 5.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 257 1737 763 282 2569 248 281 521 278 214 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.37 0.11 c0.33 c0.08 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.11 0.08 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.75 0.07 0.67 0.64 0.72 0.52 0.44 0.42 0.79 Uniform Delay,dl 55.2 28.4 18.4 55.5 24.9 43.9 55.1 39.0 47.1 59.6 Progression Factor 0.80 0.67 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.0 2.1 0.1 5.3 1.3 9.0 1.0 0.4 0.6 17.0 Delay(s) 45.0 21.0 17.1 60.8 26.2 52.9 56.1 39.4 47.7 76.6 Level of Service D C B E C D E D D E Approach Delay(s) 22.8 29.7 47.1 65.8 Approach LOS C C D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 32.5 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Background Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: North Costco Dwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 f - , 4\ t 1 4/ Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r 14 14 Volume(veh/h) 0 60 0 853 466 188 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 15% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 65 0 917 501 202 Pedestrians 1 1 Lane Width(ft) 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 Right turn flare(veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) 372 614 pX,platoon unblocked 0.94 0.94 0.94 vC,conflicting volume 1063 603 704 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 603 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 460 vCu, unblocked vol 736 545 652 tC,single(s) 6.8 *6.2 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 5.8 tF(s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free% 100 87 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 481 509 885 Direction, Lane# EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 65 459 459 703 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 65 0 0 202 cSH 509 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.13 0.27 0.27 0.41 Queue Length 95th(ft) 11 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 13.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B Approach Delay(s) 13.1 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 * User Entered Value 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Background Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: South Costco Dwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 4 t 1 4' Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r Volume(vph) 227 163 212 599 466 27 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 1603 1804 3574 3576 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 1603 756 3574 3576 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 247 177 230 651 507 29 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 100 0 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 247 77 230 651 532 0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 1 2 2 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% Turn Type pm+ov D.P+P Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 14.2 23.5 24.5 29.5 15.2 Effective Green,g(s) 14.2 23.5 24.5 29.5 15.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.43 0.45 0.55 0.28 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 474 844 523 1949 1005 v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.02 c0.08 0.18 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.09 0.44 0.33 0.53 Uniform Delay,dl 17.0 9.0 9.3 6.8 16.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.5 Delay(s) 18.1 9.0 9.5 6.9 16.9 Level of Service B A A A B Approach Delay(s) 14.3 7.6 16.9 Approach LOS B A B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.9 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 54.1 Sum of lost time(s) 15.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Background Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: SW Dartmouth St & SW 72nd Ave 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) t r ) 1+ ii 1+ ii t r Volume(vph) 132 260 220 195 359 100 324 280 59 96 131 124 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1802 1900 1615 1787 1828 1804 1812 1787 1900 1593 Flt Permitted 0.30 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.66 1.00 0.45 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 571 1900 1615 1026 1828 1261 1812 855 1900 1593 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow(vph) 147 289 244 217 399 111 360 311 66 107 146 138 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 146 0 17 0 0 13 0 0 0 80 Lane Group Flow(vph) 147 289 98 217 493 0 360 364 0 107 146 58 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 3 3 1 1 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 2 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 5% 1% 0% 0% Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 18.2 18.2 18.2 18.2 18.2 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Effective Green,g(s) 18.2 18.2 18.2 18.2 18.2 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 230 765 650 413 736 530 762 359 799 670 v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.27 0.20 0.08 v/s Ratio Perm 0.26 0.06 0.21 c0.29 0.13 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.38 0.15 0.53 0.67 0.68 0.48 0.30 0.18 0.09 Uniform Delay,dl 10.9 9.5 8.6 10.2 11.0 10.6 9.5 8.7 8.2 7.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 5.7 0.3 0.1 1.2 2.3 3.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 Delay(s) 16.6 9.8 8.7 11.4 13.4 14.1 10.0 9.1 8.3 7.9 Level of Service B A A B B B A A A A Approach Delay(s) 10.9 12.8 12.0 8.4 Approach LOS B B B A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 45.2 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Background Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1 : SW Pacific Hwy & Hwy 217 SB Ramps 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 r ) 14 ii 4 r Volume(vph) 0 1555 341 115 1629 0 0 0 0 646 7 448 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3539 1528 1770 3539 1681 1688 1551 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3539 1528 1770 3539 1681 1688 1551 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow(vph) 0 1620 355 120 1697 0 0 0 0 673 7 467 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 1620 276 120 1697 0 0 0 0 336 344 447 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 4 2 2 4 8 8 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 2% 3% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% Turn Type Perm Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 4 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 67.6 67.6 10.3 82.4 38.1 38.1 38.1 Effective Green,g(s) 68.1 68.1 10.8 82.9 39.1 39.1 39.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.52 0.08 0.64 0.30 0.30 0.30 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 4.8 4.8 2.5 4.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 1854 800 147 2257 506 508 466 v/s Ratio Prot c0.46 0.07 c0.48 v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.20 0.20 c0.29 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.34 0.82 0.75 0.66 0.68 0.96 Uniform Delay,dl 27.2 18.0 58.6 16.4 39.7 39.9 44.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.24 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 6.1 1.2 24.3 2.0 2.8 3.1 31.5 Delay(s) 33.2 19.2 97.0 17.9 42.5 43.0 76.2 Level of Service C B F B D D E Approach Delay(s) 30.7 23.1 0.0 56.4 Approach LOS C C A E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 33.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.90 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 130.0 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 132.6% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Background Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SW Pacific Hwy & Hwy 217 NB Ramps 7/31/2013 _ C 4- 4\ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 14 r +14 li r Volume(vph) 1836 365 0 2142 269 197 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 *0.96 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3539 1534 5365 1770 1568 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3539 1534 5365 1770 1568 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow(vph) 1893 376 0 2208 277 203 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 97 0 0 0 24 Lane Group Flow(vph) 1893 279 0 2208 277 179 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 1 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 3% 0% 2% 2% 3% Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 2 8 Actuated Green,G(s) 96.6 96.6 96.6 23.9 23.9 Effective Green,g(s) 96.6 96.6 96.6 24.9 24.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.19 0.19 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 4.6 4.6 5.2 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 2630 1140 3987 339 300 v/s Ratio Prot c0.53 0.41 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.25 0.55 0.82 0.60 Uniform Delay,dl 9.2 5.2 7.3 50.4 48.0 Progression Factor 0.79 1.95 0.54 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.1 0.3 0.4 13.6 2.4 Delay(s) 8.3 10.5 4.3 64.0 50.4 Level of Service A B A E D Approach Delay(s) 8.7 4.3 58.2 Approach LOS A A E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.5 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 130.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Background Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW Pacific Hwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) 14 r "I '`'FT+ li 14 li 1+ Volume(vph) 57 1133 753 134 1374 30 638 124 125 135 151 69 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 3505 1549 1787 5066 3467 1719 1770 1774 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 3505 1549 1787 5066 3467 1719 1770 1774 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow(vph) 59 1180 784 140 1431 31 665 129 130 141 157 72 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 288 0 2 0 0 28 0 0 12 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 59 1180 496 140 1460 0 665 231 0 141 217 0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 10 6 6 10 18 18 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 2 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 1% 3% Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Split Split Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green,G(s) 7.3 66.7 66.7 10.8 70.2 21.5 21.5 13.5 13.5 Effective Green,g(s) 7.3 67.2 67.2 10.8 70.7 22.0 22.0 14.0 14.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.52 0.52 0.08 0.54 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.11 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension(s) 2.3 5.2 5.2 2.3 5.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 101 1812 801 148 2755 587 291 191 191 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.34 c0.08 0.29 c0.19 0.13 0.08 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.65 0.62 0.95 0.53 1.13 0.79 0.74 1.13 Uniform Delay,dl 59.9 22.9 22.3 59.3 19.0 54.0 51.8 56.2 58.0 Progression Factor 0.82 1.16 2.10 0.77 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 4.5 1.3 2.5 52.6 0.6 79.5 13.2 12.7 105.6 Delay(s) 53.5 27.9 49.4 98.0 5.2 133.5 65.0 68.9 163.6 Level of Service D C D F A F E E F Approach Delay(s) 37.0 13.3 114.3 127.5 Approach LOS D B F F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 50.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 130.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Background Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SW Pacific Hwy & SW 72nd Ave 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) 14 r "I 141 li t r ) 1+ Volume(vph) 132 1081 80 127 1326 39 87 101 192 114 83 112 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 3505 1562 1805 5058 1787 1900 1549 1767 1708 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00 0.53 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 3505 1562 1805 5058 512 1900 1549 994 1708 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow(vph) 136 1114 82 131 1367 40 90 104 198 118 86 115 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 26 0 2 0 0 0 106 0 39 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 136 1114 56 131 1405 0 90 104 92 118 162 0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 4 2 2 4 26 26 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 3% 1% 0% 2% 3% 1% 0% 2% 1% 0% 3% Turn Type Prot Perm Prot pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 8 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 16.5 72.5 72.5 12.3 68.3 26.3 15.8 28.1 28.1 16.7 Effective Green,g(s) 17.0 73.0 73.0 12.8 68.8 27.3 16.3 29.1 29.1 17.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.56 0.56 0.10 0.53 0.21 0.13 0.22 0.22 0.13 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 5.1 5.1 2.3 5.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 231 1968 877 178 2677 215 238 394 293 226 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.32 c0.07 0.28 0.04 0.05 0.02 c0.04 c0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.57 0.06 0.74 0.52 0.42 0.44 0.23 0.40 0.72 Uniform Delay,dl 53.2 18.3 13.0 57.0 19.9 43.1 52.6 41.3 42.0 54.1 Progression Factor 0.69 0.61 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 2.8 0.9 0.1 13.4 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.2 0.5 9.3 Delay(s) 39.8 12.0 7.9 70.4 20.7 43.8 53.4 41.5 42.6 63.3 Level of Service D B A E C D D D D E Approach Delay(s) 14.6 24.9 45.2 55.6 Approach LOS B C D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 26.0 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 130.0 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Background Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: North Costco Dwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 f - , 4\ t 1 4/ Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r 14 14 Volume(veh/h) 0 200 0 893 634 415 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 15% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 204 0 911 647 423 Pedestrians 2 3 Lane Width(ft) 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 Right turn flare(veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) 372 614 pX,platoon unblocked 0.95 0.92 0.92 vC,conflicting volume 1319 861 1072 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 861 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 459 vCu, unblocked vol 1042 802 1033 tC,single(s) 6.8 *6.2 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 5.8 tF(s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free% 100 42 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 350 353 622 Direction, Lane# EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 204 456 456 1070 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 204 0 0 423 cSH 353 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.58 0.27 0.27 0.63 Queue Length 95th(ft) 87 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 28.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS D Approach Delay(s) 28.2 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary Average Delay 2.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 * User Entered Value 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Background Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: South Costco Dwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 4 t 1 4' Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r Volume(vph) 326 214 233 494 680 52 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 1615 1805 3574 3533 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 1615 441 3574 3533 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow(vph) 347 228 248 526 723 55 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 49 0 0 5 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 347 179 248 526 773 0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 1 1 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% Turn Type pm+ov D.P+P Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 20.0 30.8 34.3 39.3 23.5 Effective Green,g(s) 20.0 30.8 34.3 39.3 23.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.44 0.49 0.56 0.34 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 518 830 428 2015 1191 v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 0.03 c0.09 0.15 c0.22 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.22 0.58 0.26 0.65 Uniform Delay,dl 21.9 12.0 11.2 7.8 19.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 3.3 0.0 1.2 0.1 1.2 Delay(s) 25.2 12.0 12.4 7.8 20.8 Level of Service C B B A C Approach Delay(s) 20.0 9.3 20.8 Approach LOS B A C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 16.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 69.7 Sum of lost time(s) 15.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Background Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: SW Dartmouth St & SW 72nd Ave 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) t r ) 1+ ii 1+ ii t r Volume(vph) 172 296 290 47 278 49 323 197 28 93 179 174 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1801 1881 1615 1805 1829 1800 1834 1805 1863 1590 Flt Permitted 0.49 1.00 1.00 0.53 1.00 0.64 1.00 0.61 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 930 1881 1615 1009 1829 1214 1834 1167 1863 1590 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow(vph) 177 305 299 48 287 51 333 203 29 96 185 179 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 186 0 11 0 0 9 0 0 0 103 Lane Group Flow(vph) 177 305 113 48 327 0 333 223 0 96 185 76 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 3 3 5 5 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 2% 0% 1% 4% 0% 2% 0% Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 15.4 15.4 15.4 15.4 15.4 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.3 Effective Green,g(s) 15.4 15.4 15.4 15.4 15.4 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 352 712 611 382 692 516 780 496 792 676 v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 0.18 0.12 0.10 v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 0.07 0.05 c0.27 0.08 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.43 0.19 0.13 0.47 0.65 0.29 0.19 0.23 0.11 Uniform Delay,dl 9.7 9.4 8.5 8.3 9.6 9.3 7.7 7.3 7.5 7.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.1 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.5 2.8 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 Delay(s) 10.8 9.8 8.6 8.4 10.1 12.0 7.9 7.5 7.6 7.1 Level of Service B A A A B B A A A A Approach Delay(s) 9.6 9.9 10.3 7.4 Approach LOS A A B A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 9.4 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 40.7 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Background Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 7 Appendix F 2014 Total Traffic LOS Worksheets HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1 : SW Pacific Hwy & Hwy 217 SB Ramps 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 r I 14 ii 4 r Volume(vph) 0 1535 241 59 1942 0 0 0 0 537 1 246 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3505 1511 1805 3539 1681 1686 1563 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3505 1511 1805 3539 1681 1686 1563 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow(vph) 0 1599 251 61 2023 0 0 0 0 559 1 256 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 1599 209 61 2023 0 0 0 0 279 281 243 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 1 8 8 1 1 1 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 5 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 2% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% Turn Type Perm Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 4 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 89.7 89.7 8.2 102.4 28.1 28.1 28.1 Effective Green,g(s) 90.2 90.2 8.7 102.9 29.1 29.1 29.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.64 0.64 0.06 0.74 0.21 0.21 0.21 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 4.8 4.8 2.5 4.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 2258 974 112 2601 349 350 325 v/s Ratio Prot 0.46 0.03 c0.57 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.17 0.17 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.21 0.54 0.78 0.80 0.80 0.75 Uniform Delay,dl 16.3 10.3 63.7 11.5 52.7 52.7 52.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.15 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.9 0.5 3.2 1.8 11.6 12.0 8.3 Delay(s) 18.2 10.8 76.7 8.7 64.2 64.7 60.3 Level of Service B B E A E E E Approach Delay(s) 17.2 10.7 0.0 63.2 Approach LOS B B A E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 22.2 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 125.6% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SW Pacific Hwy & Hwy 217 NB Ramps 7/31/2013 _ C 4- 4\ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 14 r +14 li r Volume(vph) 1725 346 0 2441 246 125 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 *0.89 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3505 1515 4974 1770 1615 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3505 1515 4974 1770 1615 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow(vph) 1816 364 0 2569 259 132 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 83 0 0 0 36 Lane Group Flow(vph) 1816 281 0 2569 259 96 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 6 6 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 6 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 0% 2% 2% 0% Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 2 8 Actuated Green,G(s) 108.1 108.1 108.1 22.4 22.4 Effective Green,g(s) 108.1 108.1 108.1 23.4 23.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.17 0.17 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 4.6 4.6 5.2 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 2706 1170 3841 296 270 v/s Ratio Prot c0.52 0.52 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.24 0.67 0.88 0.36 Uniform Delay,dl 7.5 4.5 7.5 56.9 51.6 Progression Factor 1.07 3.46 0.46 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.0 0.4 0.6 23.4 0.5 Delay(s) 9.1 15.8 4.0 80.3 52.1 Level of Service A B A F D Approach Delay(s) 10.2 4.0 70.8 Approach LOS B A E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.7 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW Pacific Hwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) 14 r "I '`'FT+ li 14 li 1+ Volume(vph) 83 1216 491 120 1702 11 590 211 125 141 117 37 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.96 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 3505 1576 1805 5080 3502 1773 1805 1796 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 3505 1576 1805 5080 3502 1773 1805 1796 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow(vph) 86 1267 511 125 1773 11 615 220 130 147 122 39 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 215 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 8 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 86 1267 296 125 1784 0 615 335 0 147 153 0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 2 1 1 2 8 8 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 3 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8% Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Split Split Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green,G(s) 10.9 80.5 80.5 14.0 83.6 16.5 16.5 11.5 11.5 Effective Green,g(s) 10.9 81.0 81.0 14.0 84.1 17.0 17.0 12.0 12.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.58 0.58 0.10 0.60 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.09 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension(s) 2.3 5.2 5.2 2.3 5.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 141 2028 912 181 3052 425 215 155 154 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.36 c0.07 0.35 0.18 c0.19 0.08 c0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.62 0.32 0.69 0.58 1.45 1.56 0.95 0.99 Uniform Delay,dl 62.5 19.5 15.3 60.9 17.2 61.5 61.5 63.7 64.0 Progression Factor 0.88 1.20 4.50 0.92 0.66 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 4.3 1.1 0.7 7.6 0.6 214.1 272.8 56.1 69.9 Delay(s) 59.2 24.4 69.6 63.8 12.0 275.6 334.3 119.8 133.8 Level of Service E C E E B F F F F Approach Delay(s) 38.4 15.3 296.9 127.1 Approach LOS D B F F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 84.5 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SW Pacific Hwy & SW 72nd Ave 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) 14 r "I 141 li t r ) 1+ Volume(vph) 117 1264 71 185 1569 28 172 140 297 113 91 99 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.92 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 3505 1540 1787 5023 1787 1900 1559 1790 1729 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 3505 1540 1787 5023 364 1900 1559 1025 1729 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow(vph) 122 1317 74 193 1634 29 179 146 309 118 95 103 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 23 0 1 0 0 0 73 0 29 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 122 1317 51 193 1662 0 179 146 236 118 169 0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 3 9 9 3 18 18 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 3 2 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 1% 1% 3% 0% 1% 0% 2% 0% 1% 0% Turn Type Prot Perm Prot pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 8 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 19.7 68.6 68.6 21.9 70.8 34.9 20.2 42.1 28.1 16.8 Effective Green,g(s) 20.2 69.1 69.1 22.4 71.3 35.9 20.7 43.1 29.1 17.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.49 0.49 0.16 0.51 0.26 0.15 0.31 0.21 0.12 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 5.1 5.1 2.3 5.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 260 1730 760 286 2558 248 281 524 278 214 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.38 0.11 c0.33 c0.08 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.11 0.08 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.76 0.07 0.67 0.65 0.72 0.52 0.45 0.42 0.79 Uniform Delay,dl 55.0 28.8 18.6 55.4 25.2 43.9 55.1 38.9 47.1 59.6 Progression Factor 0.80 0.66 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 0.9 2.2 0.1 5.3 1.3 9.0 1.0 0.4 0.6 17.0 Delay(s) 45.0 21.2 16.3 60.7 26.5 52.9 56.1 39.3 47.7 76.6 Level of Service D C B E C D E D D E Approach Delay(s) 22.9 30.0 47.0 65.8 Approach LOS C C D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 32.6 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 140.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: North Costco Dwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 f - , 4\ t 1 4/ Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r 14 14 Volume(veh/h) 0 89 0 935 441 294 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 15% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 96 0 1005 474 316 Pedestrians 1 1 Lane Width(ft) 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 Right turn flare(veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) 372 614 pX,platoon unblocked 0.94 0.94 0.94 vC,conflicting volume 1137 633 791 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 633 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 504 vCu, unblocked vol 815 575 744 tC,single(s) 6.8 *6.2 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 5.8 tF(s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free% 100 80 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 457 488 817 Direction, Lane# EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 96 503 503 790 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 96 0 0 316 cSH 488 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.46 Queue Length 95th(ft) 18 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B Approach Delay(s) 14.2 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 * User Entered Value 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: South Costco Dwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 4 t 1 4' Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r Volume(vph) 334 173 251 574 466 27 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 1602 1804 3574 3576 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.37 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 1602 702 3574 3576 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph) 363 188 273 624 507 29 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 74 0 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 363 114 273 624 532 0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 1 2 2 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% Turn Type pm+ov D.P+P Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 18.7 30.4 28.7 33.7 17.0 Effective Green,g(s) 18.7 30.4 28.7 33.7 17.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.48 0.46 0.54 0.27 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 537 903 526 1918 968 v/s Ratio Prot c0.20 0.02 c0.10 0.17 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.13 0.52 0.33 0.55 Uniform Delay,dl 19.4 8.9 11.0 8.2 19.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 3.4 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.6 Delay(s) 22.7 8.9 11.4 8.3 20.3 Level of Service C A B A C Approach Delay(s) 18.0 9.2 20.3 Approach LOS B A C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 14.6 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 62.8 Sum of lost time(s) 15.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: SW Dartmouth St & SW 72nd Ave 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) t r ) 1+ ii 1+ ii t r Volume(vph) 136 265 225 195 364 100 328 280 59 96 131 128 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1802 1900 1615 1787 1829 1804 1812 1787 1900 1593 Flt Permitted 0.30 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 0.66 1.00 0.45 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 576 1900 1615 1020 1829 1261 1812 845 1900 1593 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow(vph) 151 294 250 217 404 111 364 311 66 107 146 142 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 147 0 17 0 0 13 0 0 0 83 Lane Group Flow(vph) 151 294 103 217 498 0 364 364 0 107 146 59 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 3 3 1 1 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 2 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 5% 1% 0% 0% Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 Effective Green,g(s) 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 237 783 666 421 754 520 747 348 783 657 v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.27 0.20 0.08 v/s Ratio Perm 0.26 0.06 0.21 c0.29 0.13 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.38 0.15 0.52 0.66 0.70 0.49 0.31 0.19 0.09 Uniform Delay,dl 10.7 9.3 8.4 10.0 10.8 11.1 9.9 9.0 8.5 8.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 5.5 0.3 0.1 1.1 2.2 4.1 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 Delay(s) 16.2 9.6 8.5 11.1 13.0 15.2 10.4 9.5 8.6 8.2 Level of Service B A A B B B B A A A Approach Delay(s) 10.7 12.4 12.7 8.7 Approach LOS B B B A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.5 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 45.6 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1 : SW Pacific Hwy & Hwy 217 SB Ramps 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 r ) 14 ii 4 r Volume(vph) 0 1568 341 121 1643 0 0 0 0 654 7 448 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3539 1528 1770 3539 1681 1688 1551 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3539 1528 1770 3539 1681 1688 1551 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow(vph) 0 1633 355 126 1711 0 0 0 0 681 7 467 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 1633 276 126 1711 0 0 0 0 340 348 448 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 4 2 2 4 8 8 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 2% 3% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% Turn Type Perm Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 4 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 67.5 67.5 10.4 82.4 38.1 38.1 38.1 Effective Green,g(s) 68.0 68.0 10.9 82.9 39.1 39.1 39.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.52 0.08 0.64 0.30 0.30 0.30 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 4.8 4.8 2.5 4.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 1851 799 148 2257 506 508 466 v/s Ratio Prot c0.46 0.07 c0.48 v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.20 0.21 c0.29 v/c Ratio 0.88 0.35 0.85 0.76 0.67 0.69 0.96 Uniform Delay,dl 27.5 18.0 58.8 16.5 39.8 40.0 44.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.23 1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 6.5 1.2 30.4 2.1 3.0 3.3 31.8 Delay(s) 33.9 19.2 102.9 18.8 42.8 43.3 76.5 Level of Service C B F B D D E Approach Delay(s) 31.3 24.6 0.0 56.6 Approach LOS C C A E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 34.7 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 130.0 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 133.5% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: SW Pacific Hwy & Hwy 217 NB Ramps 7/31/2013 _ C 4- 4\ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 14 r +14 li r Volume(vph) 1858 365 0 2170 269 202 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 *0.96 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 3539 1534 5365 1770 1568 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3539 1534 5365 1770 1568 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow(vph) 1915 376 0 2237 277 208 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 97 0 0 0 23 Lane Group Flow(vph) 1915 279 0 2237 277 185 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 1 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 3% 0% 2% 2% 3% Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 2 8 Actuated Green,G(s) 96.6 96.6 96.6 23.9 23.9 Effective Green,g(s) 96.6 96.6 96.6 24.9 24.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.19 0.19 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 4.6 4.6 5.2 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 2630 1140 3987 339 300 v/s Ratio Prot c0.54 0.42 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.25 0.56 0.82 0.62 Uniform Delay,dl 9.3 5.2 7.4 50.4 48.2 Progression Factor 0.78 1.90 0.59 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.1 0.3 0.4 13.6 3.0 Delay(s) 8.4 10.3 4.7 64.0 51.2 Level of Service A B A E D Approach Delay(s) 8.7 4.7 58.5 Approach LOS A A E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.7 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 130.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: SW Pacific Hwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) 14 r "I '`'FT+ li 14 li 1+ Volume(vph) 57 1108 806 168 1349 30 691 127 158 135 153 69 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 3505 1549 1787 5066 3467 1700 1770 1774 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 3505 1549 1787 5066 3467 1700 1770 1774 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow(vph) 59 1154 840 175 1405 31 720 132 165 141 159 72 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 283 0 2 0 0 35 0 0 12 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 59 1154 557 175 1434 0 720 262 0 141 219 0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 10 6 6 10 18 18 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 2 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 3% 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 1% 3% Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Split Split Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 7 7 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green,G(s) 7.3 66.7 66.7 10.8 70.2 21.5 21.5 13.5 13.5 Effective Green,g(s) 7.3 67.2 67.2 10.8 70.7 22.0 22.0 14.0 14.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.52 0.52 0.08 0.54 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.11 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension(s) 2.3 5.2 5.2 2.3 5.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 101 1812 801 148 2755 587 288 191 191 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.33 c0.10 0.28 c0.21 0.15 0.08 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm c0.36 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.64 0.70 1.18 0.52 1.23 0.91 0.74 1.14 Uniform Delay,dl 59.9 22.6 23.7 59.6 18.9 54.0 53.0 56.2 58.0 Progression Factor 0.82 1.16 1.80 0.77 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 4.4 1.2 3.5 126.5 0.6 116.5 30.6 12.7 109.2 Delay(s) 53.7 27.5 46.0 172.6 5.0 170.5 83.6 68.9 167.2 Level of Service D C D F A F F E F Approach Delay(s) 35.8 23.2 145.1 130.0 Approach LOS D C F F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 60.7 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.90 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 130.0 Sum of lost time(s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: SW Pacific Hwy & SW 72nd Ave 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) 14 r "I 141 li t r ) 1+ Volume(vph) 132 1089 80 132 1335 39 87 101 197 114 83 112 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 3505 1562 1805 5058 1787 1900 1550 1767 1708 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.27 1.00 1.00 0.53 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 3505 1562 1805 5058 512 1900 1550 994 1708 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow(vph) 136 1123 82 136 1376 40 90 104 203 118 86 115 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 26 0 2 0 0 0 105 0 39 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 136 1123 56 136 1414 0 90 104 98 118 162 0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 4 2 2 4 26 26 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 3% 1% 0% 2% 3% 1% 0% 2% 1% 0% 3% Turn Type Prot Perm Prot pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 1 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 8 4 Actuated Green,G(s) 16.5 72.0 72.0 12.8 68.3 26.3 15.8 28.6 28.1 16.7 Effective Green,g(s) 17.0 72.5 72.5 13.3 68.8 27.3 16.3 29.6 29.1 17.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.56 0.56 0.10 0.53 0.21 0.13 0.23 0.22 0.13 Clearance Time(s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 5.1 5.1 2.3 5.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 231 1955 871 185 2677 215 238 401 293 226 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.32 c0.08 0.28 0.04 0.05 0.03 c0.04 c0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.57 0.06 0.74 0.53 0.42 0.44 0.24 0.40 0.72 Uniform Delay,dl 53.2 18.7 13.2 56.6 20.0 43.1 52.6 41.1 42.0 54.1 Progression Factor 0.70 0.59 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 2.8 0.9 0.1 12.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.2 0.5 9.3 Delay(s) 39.8 11.9 7.1 69.5 20.7 43.8 53.4 41.2 42.6 63.3 Level of Service D B A E C D D D D E Approach Delay(s) 14.4 25.0 45.0 55.6 Approach LOS B C D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 26.0 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 130.0 Sum of lost time(s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: North Costco Dwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 f - , 4\ t 1 4/ Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r 14 14 Volume(veh/h) 0 227 0 982 612 526 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 15% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Hourly flow rate(vph) 0 232 0 1002 624 537 Pedestrians 2 3 Lane Width(ft) 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 Right turn flare(veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal(ft) 372 614 pX,platoon unblocked 0.95 0.91 0.91 vC,conflicting volume 1399 895 1163 vC1,stage 1 conf vol 895 vC2,stage 2 conf vol 504 vCu, unblocked vol 1101 838 1132 tC,single(s) 6.8 *6.2 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) 5.8 tF(s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free% 100 31 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 333 336 570 Direction, Lane# EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 232 501 501 1161 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 232 0 0 537 cSH 336 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.69 0.29 0.29 0.68 Queue Length 95th(ft) 121 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 36.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS E Approach Delay(s) 36.4 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary Average Delay 3.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 * User Entered Value 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: South Costco Dwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 4 t 1 4' Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r Volume(vph) 437 227 272 471 680 52 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1805 1615 1805 3574 3533 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1805 1615 357 3574 3533 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow(vph) 465 241 289 501 723 55 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 42 0 0 5 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 465 199 289 501 773 0 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 1 1 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% Turn Type pm+ov D.P+P Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 30.6 43.8 38.6 43.6 25.4 Effective Green,g(s) 30.6 43.8 38.6 43.6 25.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.36 0.52 0.46 0.52 0.30 Clearance Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 653 932 389 1842 1061 v/s Ratio Prot c0.26 0.03 c0.12 0.14 0.22 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 c0.22 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.21 0.74 0.27 0.73 Uniform Delay,dl 23.2 11.1 16.4 11.6 26.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 3.7 0.0 6.6 0.1 2.5 Delay(s) 26.9 11.1 23.0 11.6 29.0 Level of Service C B C B C Approach Delay(s) 21.5 15.8 29.0 Approach LOS C B C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 22.1 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 84.6 Sum of lost time(s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: SW Dartmouth St & SW 72nd Ave 7/31/2013 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) t r ) 1+ ii 1+ ii t r Volume(vph) 177 301 296 47 283 49 328 197 28 93 179 179 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb,ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1801 1881 1615 1805 1830 1800 1834 1805 1863 1589 Flt Permitted 0.48 1.00 1.00 0.52 1.00 0.64 1.00 0.61 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 912 1881 1615 991 1830 1214 1834 1167 1863 1589 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow(vph) 182 310 305 48 292 51 338 203 29 96 185 185 RTOR Reduction(vph) 0 0 190 0 11 0 0 10 0 0 0 105 Lane Group Flow(vph) 182 310 115 48 332 0 338 222 0 96 185 80 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 3 3 5 5 Confl. Bikes(#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 2% 0% 1% 4% 0% 2% 0% Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 Effective Green,g(s) 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 344 709 609 373 690 522 789 502 801 683 v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 0.18 0.12 0.10 v/s Ratio Perm c0.20 0.07 0.05 c0.28 0.08 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.53 0.44 0.19 0.13 0.48 0.65 0.28 0.19 0.23 0.12 Uniform Delay,dl 10.0 9.6 8.7 8.4 9.8 9.3 7.7 7.3 7.5 7.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.5 2.8 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 Delay(s) 11.5 10.1 8.8 8.6 10.4 12.1 7.9 7.5 7.6 7.2 Level of Service B B A A B B A A A A Approach Delay(s) 9.9 10.1 10.4 7.4 Approach LOS A B B A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 9.5 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 41.4 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 7 Appendix G Queuing Analysis Worksheets Queues 6: South Costco Dwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 247 177 230 651 536 v/c Ratio 0.53 0.22 0.44 0.34 0.54 Control Delay 22.8 2.2 10.3 8.0 19.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 22.8 2.2 10.3 8.0 19.9 Queue Length 50th(ft) 67 0 32 51 72 Queue Length 95th(ft) 149 23 89 116 153 Internal Link Dist(ft) 183 300 292 Turn Bay Length(ft) 100 100 225 Base Capacity(vph) 1207 1347 1063 3574 3201 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.13 0.22 0.18 0.17 Intersection Summary 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Background Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 1 Queues 6: South Costco Dwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 363 188 273 624 536 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.22 0.52 0.33 0.56 Control Delay 27.9 3.1 12.8 9.3 23.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 27.9 3.1 12.8 9.3 23.6 Queue Length 50th(ft) 120 7 50 62 90 Queue Length 95th(ft) 243 34 117 123 173 Internal Link Dist(ft) 183 300 292 Turn Bay Length(ft) 100 100 225 Base Capacity(vph) 1043 1294 947 3574 2885 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.15 0.29 0.17 0.19 Intersection Summary 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions-Weekday PM Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 1 Queues 6: South Costco Dwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 347 228 248 526 778 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.26 0.58 0.26 0.66 Control Delay 30.7 7.1 14.8 8.8 24.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.7 7.1 14.8 8.8 24.0 Queue Length 50th(ft) 127 29 47 53 142 Queue Length 95th(ft) 264 80 112 108 263 Internal Link Dist(ft) 183 300 292 Turn Bay Length(ft) 100 100 225 Base Capacity(vph) 944 1322 865 3501 2639 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.37 0.17 0.29 0.15 0.29 Intersection Summary 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Background Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 1 Queues 6: South Costco Dwy & SW Dartmouth St 7/31/2013 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow(vph) 465 241 289 501 778 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.25 0.74 0.27 0.74 Control Delay 32.1 6.6 28.0 12.2 32.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 32.1 6.6 28.0 12.2 32.0 Queue Length 50th(ft) 206 35 86 77 195 Queue Length 95th(ft) 396 86 178 113 295 Internal Link Dist(ft) 183 300 292 Turn Bay Length(ft) 100 100 225 Base Capacity(vph) 762 1284 710 3384 2134 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.61 0.19 0.41 0.15 0.36 Intersection Summary 11367-Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Year 2014 Total Traffic Conditions-Weekend Midday Peak Hour Synchro 7- Report KML Page 1 Project Name:Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#: 11367 Analysis Scenario: 2014 Background Conditions,Weekday PM Peak V=flow rate for movement Analysis Period: 1 (peak hour analysis) C=capacity of movement Analyst: KML Q=95th percentile queue(veh) Date:July 31,2013 5=storage need(ft) #of Int: 1 Veh.Length(ft): 25 *Queue length calculated using Equation(17-37)presented inHghway CapaciryManua/200t. NB LT NB TH NB RT SB LT 5B TH 5B RT EB LT EB TH EB RT WB LT WB TH WB RT V 60 SW Dartmouth Street/ C 509 North Costco Driveway Q 0.4 S 25 11367_N Costco Dwy Queues.xls bc_pm Project Name:Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#: 11367 Analysis Scenario: 2014 Background Conditions,Weekday PM Peak V=flow rate for movement Analysis Period: 1 (peak hour analysis) C=capacity of movement Analyst: KML Q=95th percentile queue(veh) Date:July 31,2013 5=storage need(ft) #of Int: 1 Veh.Length(ft): 25 *Queue length calculated using Equation(17-37)presented inHghway CapaciryManua/200t. NB LT NB TH NB RT SB LT 5B TH 5B RT EB LT EB TH EB RT WB LT WB TH WB RT V 89 SW Dartmouth Street/ C 488 North Costco Driveway Q 0.7 S 25 11367_N Costco Dwy Queues.xls tt_pm Project Name:Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#: 11367 Analysis Scenario: 2014 Background Conditions,Weekend midday V =flow rate for movement Analysis Period: 1 (peak hour analysis) C =capacity of movement Analyst: KML Q =95th percentile queue(veh) Date: July 31,2013 5 = storage need(ft) #of Int: 1 Veh. Length(ft): 25 *Queue length calculated using Equation(17-37)presented inHghway Capacity Manual 2000. NB LT NB TH NB RT 58 LT 5B TH 5B RT EB LT EB TH EB RT WB LT WB TH WB RT V 200 SW Dartmouth Street/ C 353 North Costco Driveway Q 3.7 5 100 11367_N Costco Dwy Queues.xls bc_we Project Name:Tigard Costco Gasoline Addition Project#: 11367 Analysis Scenario: 2014 Total Traffic Conditions,Weekend midday V=flow rate for movement Analysis Period: 1 (peak hour analysis) C=capacity of movement Analyst: KML Q=95th percentile queue(veh) Date:July 31,2013 5=storage need(ft) #of Int: 1 Veh.Length(ft): 25 *Queue length calculated using Equation(17-37)presented inHghway CapaciryManua/200t. NB LT NB TH NB RT SB LT 5B TH 5B RT EB LT EB TH EB RT WB LT WB TH WB RT V 227 SW Dartmouth Street/ C 336 North Costco Driveway Q 5.7 S 150 11367_N Costco Dwy Queues.xls tt_we Appendix H Parking Supply & Demand Data Andrew Walters 10/9/2010 Quality Counts Costco Wholesale f RANSPORTATION DATA Tigard,OR COLLECTION SERVICES 16285 SW 85th Ave,Ste 302 Tigard,OR 97224 Costco Parking Utilization Survey IZone 1 2 3 4 Site Total Designation m ua'x '' o Ts Ts Tso s a 1 F g a I g a I g a I g a o g Stall Classification Available 11 66 8 MI 85 10 236 246 0 207 207 0 192 192 21 709 730 Stalls 11:00 AM 8 38 4 5 55 9 215 224 0 129 129 0 191 191 17 577 594 11:30 AM 11 41 4 5 61 10 219 229 0 154 154 0 192 192 21 610 631 12:00 PM 10 40 5 2 57 10 217 227 0 162 162 0 191 191 20 615 635 12:30 PM 7 35 3 4 49 10 235 245 0 170 170 0 192 192 17 635 652 1:00 PM 9 39 2 4 54 10 232 242 0 165 165 0 192 192 19 630 649 1:30 PM 5 37 2 4 48 9 235 244 0 192 192 0 191 191 14 657 671 0.92 2:00 PM 9 45 4 5 63 6 211 217 0 163 163 0 185 185 15 608 623 2:30 PM 10 40 8 4 62 9 221 230 0 184 184 0 192 192 19 645 664 Utilization 56% 99% 93% 99% 92% Notes General Zone 01 Cars parked along the outside perimeter curb in the SE corner of zone 1 Zone 02 Zone 03 Zone 04 COSTCO GASOLINE 7 --r--- _. . ._ . • A IP • Ai.,• •. .--r ...4•_,--t 3 417 No'- • '- • --s...... . ate, %-4, IN,., •47„,1••„'N.6%.• W'sr',.. • ii, . , i•,. .V*, . 0.-.;iv - , .. . . • ..... .4 . .. - . •. '- ''... . • 4.4.0,7.1 Igh. :-011` . -•' ' .. . , . . . . :•.:A„7.•140_ :•,. .,.. • r0i4.11, "..•.- - ::-,_,.- •. • -.. ..... , 4. , • . . •• - -""--•-but- , .i4S.. 4.-o,•• ;S.',,.-.'.•,- ;4"'i;.•-lxit...„%,-.•.••:k....- 40,• . . 07-4... • .._21.. -, . -, "...... ..... . ....P.•... • . ilk .• -...-.."1"........ .....-.. =. ' m.'....7 "Oft . '4i. 4" Ir''..es... .. •..".• ..-.1,4•44•3!.., . . . • -— •— - . ...--• - • .f.,5, ...... .:., ,; .-- 1 --- '•-: - ••;,", '::: — - '- N-0.-.. e'.* - 4. •:. : :.• ".••........!•13",.. ., . . - . _-__ ..-.--,--4,..,,-__,..,.-r•_. '-'---.-_--,--•'.W.L---.A-".-.-- . 2-2-_--_-.1-.• - -.-‘4•'-=• l'1.r 1 „,.._.., • .-.=.....i.. ,• ,.. • .7 ,.•-,..- 4 i.4i:i.4.*...‘'..:,m..'1(''1'4‘"'."._•'1!_. i. • I 4T,.rifl.:.--,4: *.,. _.-...-............. — = • --- ----- - -- - - - -- ___---...------- ----_ _ ,..-_-- • ' ' ' -.;•.." --' ------ 7------- ' —_- 4.;.------..=- - - 41°‘ _._ • .-• .-' .7 -----____ - 1&. -_____............ .-- -- --------__-7:—..".7____-.- cz.---___---;., " - - _ .., _-- ..---- - ,c.,.....,,, AA ULVAN NY;G2 librASOLINE City of Tigard Tigard Costco Fueling Facility Tigard Triangle Surrounding Area .... i 0 ,46...... ..-.;,- .• \ ..,., V- Ak ( "111- Af• ,,-- ,.. i Q 400 100 :: mi.:. TI It , 1, lc. - - ' . • ;Am - .f- . \ +.•;— !ID e X 1 is 4 „ _,• r - - P . ' lii ---'-- -- :- \\ is • . . _ . _ .. ,, Ciostco,\Alholesal itilift— i.4 . . Cc. , .. ' a 1 ...., 7.,;-•:. a .• ,: ,, " x.: • T ' • _, 4,2! ii------- : ,_ . • wait -,, . v • IRMi 4, ts. . - • ,_ ,, %i 1111 V la ii i ki;,,,. . -v. - •.:_. LO.. i'...-- -'77- --.-, ',31Alf.tfra h ups t....st c4.. 41 4 / Lit-._. il: 0 ,!:,: . -• . .7. -;.:..-.-- . -. iii . '..n.-!'`• . : Art \Ii41. -.,,. Irk IA. r -A.,.. . . t , ' .. , 1, .9. 0.. .i., 4:, . _.. 0 . --i." .41, • --....1 1.," CI , Ilt. • /-: : . , _.1 . _c. ' '115441. V ri rzz.; ''..74. •- :ikir 'V. - ' 6 -irfii ..1. , . . ..__.. --Ei. it 1 -. r -„,. . 0 A . , sw..B.,,,,,,,. _ . 0-, , . :. . ir, -v .., 1 . . r.--, - --.Hi2. ..,. , 2 ' '' ' •,.. ' - ID ' • i - r-ii . A • 47. / -, • -.. : Nun VIII . .. 1,... _._ ,. . - ,..i-L . i. , . . . . , . , • ICI' I CosPCIO fy WY of Tigard Tigard Costco Fueling Facility 41 Aerial Exhibit .;� �. .. • i .it .. . . , . 411',Jel' ...4,5' ----Nr.,".4 _ ,.. .,,....„ ... . • ii. .Pl. 1.4:',... \� i Asr. ..id,•0,_,4 , . t . . +�' rJet t r-7 . -42, I-'mi Ir ,It 1 N Area .7.%.:1.1°l'Cr"42:: .'' 1\14'-:‘71--;;::I 7 '''''1. ,L'.'_.'',"'..r_ op ,,,t4....:„.,:‘, : • i - -.. -_ . .- ., , , •Al, i IF .. . IS Costc� oiesalea r ,}1 i�ti1t "om' • e.-_—.....` _ •" .:2C 1rGoggle. - 7 �y,?. i \.a.4!-.4 !►! [S 11 [�rte,` • I '`I I I ` a ;;T4„�. �7oo( 1e ea Cosr9 1TTTT Z 4FASOLINE Ly of Tigard Tigard Costco Fueling Facility Overall Site Plan \\N -:4 - --E---- -I L3 ii2 -1)!S \\ \ ( --, �MYOI�IItf ` I 0 0 P \, ,'��.L AIG / . r b — • 'G'� • ..1. 7 , ,• ••_. a . yAR�Ep/1y�F t. A. ...AA WORK OF •y.r " • / - •••'Y•••'Y ♦ '!/ 1 \ i 1. • c 1 . 3 ® y NLi 1 . • O' 0 • D'• 0 0 • I le_��t i• ti 1 1 .a R r�`�4 mit • 7 . r t • '1 t • DAR11:01-711 Rage •"4":•••••••„ _42 T.: g=Jr . . ' \'''12.,e. 4.., , : ........,.. —- . . ' •...:,;1. jj.: (../ 1/ X,. `IDEA OF WORK Qt MULVANNYG2 mz City of Tigard Tigard Costco Fueling Facility —111 Enlarged Site Plan ( k i (,j1 j 1 ,,i1 1 ,' I -- 1,,,, ® N`.. ' '-'-- \ N► ,,I' i 9 1 ...,.) . °4t � � ° .1 * ,,IIS 1 24 1V--10 120' j• )'; )lt _ , I) j L' leg • II 41.— 1 r!olm ® 4 : ,.,„ . )61p ___ _, , , ,, , , , , . Lk, . „,,,,,„ ., , „., • _ _ .., . 0 : ,, .,,,______ __ ___ __. ,k.....tit. , i ‹,,,,, 1 1 ®:"' iv8 = 30im.1 j :In ._0~ - fir: E4, t .4 4. 1---_ .;._-1-: 1,1! ''• . . __, 8 it* ,\ \ \ 11 \ t51,_. p r�''__ '• , Afif „„,9„ , c .) ' ,r;.:,'‘‘ 014: CosTco Y+ VISUAL .6J - P48 1:4,04., Z,<,7:__-- tMULVANNY G2 goASOUNE -111.1rCity of Tigard Tigard Costco Fueling Facility 1=1 . — Landscape Site Plan _ • //� '� ria illirJ�1 .t :.`•.:.i1.,A,,•?,: .-:1.-N.!.,• ' �~*.:.{ti ., ,,l. .A..451,!..,.....-.:-.i::::•.:.• .4-6 i. i • -/� 1...:, Y.1..a.4Ymu.,dYdn�.d.h,..liih.• 1�. .:.i „, (( • '.•..'...'...'...7'• ylvrt: dial Lli 4a� mini�i. ��'"• •a_•_.;;•� \—, lit - ' _ _�. ' .Ida iiiit. � 1 •� •fr Ut - 1 �� 11 l \ SD •t \\ f� i__11. Al .. 1 1 \ , 4::-....:.3, . ii,,f- •. . .0,..,,.... .:... .. .. . . -3/4. ...•... . _....:.:.,.. . 3 ... • •r �y fie,• • `�w — Ce�i Off, • `_ ,,�' , " ,•\ �.,1_ likii • _ ►. I f,GI.jL:.:,�,lw� �IER;i, � mi:„, ,1,,,i1„6, Tre kg&ihrdiaili ,ovieirr,,,,,,,, : ,,i,,, k g• ..:. /i 7 --- _ , .dry f `'I i 'r f i , , is. ti c Il 'a f� I. rCosrco � , .� f • MULVANNYG2 irASOLINE City of Tigard Tigard Costco Fueling Facility Ground Photo Exhibit , •Inill ___ __ __ sir :-!s.- - _ _ 3 i1 ■ - ` - �. Looking south on Southwest Dartmouth Street. Looking north on Southwest Dartmouth Street CosTco47 o-GHAV � s� My of Tigard Tigard Costco Fueling Facility Proposed Perspective Rendering View SW Dartmouth Street « '"� • V ..Q i _ .. _ .V:. _ - . - -. .-•• ______)1 - - - ____ -, -- --- ter . COSTCOQ,�q�s MULVANNY G2 ',,,,? City of Tigard Tigard Costco Fueling Facility Aerial View . . - - 4 . - . ! 4114 • VI ' 1# .. -.... 's 7 o 7 --.4 --, • -... p , 17: - • 4 , , 4. , --.,. ./1111•5 • • .441". .. - — 1 4 • - . •• '4 IL -;.11.14 I Iiii ... . . . oLariv ,..i . t. z, , - . . ..m. .. f : ' —is j r .. ._. • 3 -. --. • - •=II s • — • -77.• -0 : '.1 ry. • ,,. -_.. . 4 v.11. : 1 • : • ** • ,.• . „_ • _ •41 - • i.—•. ..,-,. •.. . - ,• g ,•• s ' . • • . ... • , . I i M 6 ..,=2„.. . _ .;.,..„ ,...._.1: • ..., ......• .. . .. 44. -•NI IIIM .-:.. ' k ''1 • --.1 : ,- . - i 11-0, ' ' •4 ithe 4' ' III" . , • 4 jeiti4 N- lits4;41.. • ...... • . • 0 . _ . _ ___.. •... 4 ..."14; (- . . 11. ' .44 ........s • ,.,i„„ s... , a a - 1 , --e'l . II‘4 • . . '.4.' -0. . . ,-.4.?4, ,-,•_. .- • . si . 41 1.--- ...I'll . ' 4 .. Apt. .op i S c 4.-4.,. • . _,... ..7.1_ . . . . .. . ., . . • . , . . .. ..,-,',.,.. i . _ .111 ,... - -. ,4, ... .. •4 lir 5 . . i:. - . _.,--;.i _- _ . at 1. A • : a• ..,.: .....- ,.. . _, . . a i . lt,--411?' ' ' '7. - --, ' ' . • • , 1"1116."""o JIN. .. ,, ... 1—• • 4 . :i, I itor'ly Ili-•\ . .... ... .1. Oa ,li, A. •\ , • __- , - . . . •0-4' *.- I. : — • . ''' Z 41-5-1.--.4.-'61,4 - * • 0" ifl.. . IL\, N_... ...., . '. ....... N , I. ' ."- '': . • .. - . i I • .. . . ,-;41".:., . ..,, . ...._ ‹. , fl, , , / S • . .. . wvacc, i • • "..4 • - • ....de": 4 jet .. _ I ,.10,,, li '... , : • 4. . 4 4 • . . • ' .,. t._ . , • ' ri • ..... • ., ,A.,, ., III. it r , . . - ' • Coon= - . -. .- • • - . . .1,;. -f 4, ., • i , .• s. _. ..- - _: , :i A‘ .--1-F- 4 ... , . ' bodp ; m,:.. e ' ' - -I A., itt . --- - ,.... . sit - - . 1 ---;-; 0 ._..• —.410r ..... AA. • , ..-.. -- , •.,:p . . .4 -.... . . Ilir I • ‘ : - I : -. • " •- . '10.4 71 11 l • Wk.* ' ......-'\ .. % . - . - ..., t. 1 • ...., ., ... . .... . . ...„._ ._ ...... 1.,... : _. :. -. . :... .• •_ :_.7- •- , ... - ... tIOCOSPICIO , ,s,.1-1.9,4, Or IN MULVAN NY G2 ,trlisir, ,' -y of Tigard Tigard Costco Fueling Facility MI CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes February 10, 2014 CALL TO ORDER President Rogers called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Tigard Civic Center, Town Hall, at 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ROLL CALL Present: President Rogers Commissioner Enloe Alt. Commissioner Goodhouse Alt. Commissioner Mooney Commissioner Muldoon Commissioner Ouellette Commissioner Schmidt Absent: Commissioner Doherty; Commissioner Feeney; Commissioner Fitzgerald; Commissioner Gaschke Staff Present: Kenny Asher, Community Development Director; Tom McGuire, Assistant Community Development Director;Agnes Kowacz, Associate Planner; Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner; Lloyd Purdy, Economic Development Manager; Doreen Laughlin, Executive Assistant Also Present: David Rogers, Costco Wholesale;Angelo Bologna, Barghausen Consulting;John Ellingsen, Barghausen Consulting; Sonia Daleiden, Kittelson COMMUNICATIONS Commissioner Muldoon brought in and passed around an article from the newspaper regarding the topic of light rail vs. bus. CONSIDER MINUTES January 27 Meeting Minutes: President Rogers asked if there were any additions, deletions, or corrections to the January 27 minutes; there being none, Rogers declared the minutes approved as submitted. PUBLIC HEARING: CUP2013-00002 -- COSTCO GAS STATION The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and Tigard Triangle Design Evaluation Team approval for the construction of a members-only retail fuel station located at the existing Costco site. The station is proposed at the northeast corner of the site currently used for parking. The facility consists of a 73 foot by 102 foot canopy with three fueling islands, nine fuel dispensers and four underground storage tanks. The proposal also includes reconfiguration of the parking area surrounding the proposed fuel station and landscaping. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING Page 1 of 4 President Rogers opened the public hearing. QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING STATEMENTS President Rogers read the required statements and procedural items from the quasi-judicial hearing guide. There were no abstentions; there were no challenges of the commissioners for bias or conflict of interest. Ex-parte contacts: None. Site visitations: All the commissioners had visited Costco. No one wished to challenge the jurisdiction of the commission; no conflicts of interest. STAFF REPORT Associate Planner Agnes Kowacz was introduced and she explained that the applicant had met with staff before the hearing and requests a continuance of the hearing to March 17th. They would like to work through some of the conditions specifically related to the intersection improvements with staff before coming to the commission. QUESTIONS Before closing the hearing, there were some questions from the commissioners that they thought perhaps Costco or staff could address at the March hearing: 1. How are the spaces along Dartmouth utilized/accessed since there is a "Do Not Enter" sign on the pavement? 2. Parking agreement with adjoining business - is there a safe way for people to walk from those parking areas to Costco (other than Dartmouth/99W)? 3. How will circulation work within the existing parking lot with the fuel station addition? PUBLIC HEARING — CLOSED AND CONTINUED TO A DATE CERTAIN — MARCH 17, 2014 BRIEFING—SW CORRIDOR/BALLOT MEASURE (taken out of order) Community Development Director Kenny Asher was there as part of a public information campaign that Tigard is conducting in an effort to educate citizens/voters in the community about Ballot Measure 34-210 which is headed for an election on March 11. This is a citizen initiated measure to oppose high capacity transit in Tigard until such time that voters can elect in favor. City staff may not publically take a stance either for or against a public measure so this briefing was informational only. Mr. Asher read the ballot information: Ballot Title: Adopt Tigard Policy Opposing New High-Capacity Transit Corridor Projects. Question: Shall Tigard adopt a public policy opposing high-capacity transit corridor projects unless voter authorization is obtained? Summary: If passed, this measure would amend the Tigard Charter adopting a declared public policy opposing construction of new high-capacity transit corridors within the City, unless voter approval is first obtained. It would prohibit the City from adopting an ordinance amending its comprehensive plan or Page 2 of 4 land use regulations to accommodate siting of new high-capacity transit corridor project ("Project") absent voter approval. Such ordinance would be required to describe: The total amount of road capacity reduced by the Project; The changes in housing density or land use regulations; and The projected public cost of the Project. The City would annually send a letter to the following public officials providing notice of the city's opposition to the building of high-capacity transit: The Governor of Oregon, the Director of the Oregon Department of Transportation, Washington County Commissioners, Metro Councilors, the TriMet Governing Board and the Director of the Federal Transit Administration. The measure defines a "new high-capacity transit corridor" as any portion of regional transit system proposed for development within the City that reduces available road capacity in favor of light rail, rail transit or exclusive bus lanes. Road capacity includes any roadway within five miles of the City that currently permits public automobile traffic or any public rights-of-way that could provide additional road capacity at a future date. BRIEFING— FIELDS SITE DEVELOPMENT Associate Planner Gary Pagenstecher gave a brief background of what had happened with the Field's property up until this point in time. Economic Development Manager Lloyd Purdy asked the attendees of the briefing, and part of this charrette, to introduce themselves: • Christine McKelvey, Land-use Planner Architect, McKenzie • Matt Butts, Head of Civil Engineering, McKenzie • Kelly Hossaini, Attorney with Miller Nash representing the Fred Fields Trust • Eric Sporre, Vice President of PacTrust • Mike Merino, Sr. Vice President of Industrial Growth, Norris, Biggs and Simpson • Clayton Hering, Chairman of the Board, Norris, Biggs and Simpson — had worked with Fred Fields for the past 15 years on this and prior properties. Lloyd noted that just about all relevant partners and stakeholders are in the room. He went over a Power Point presentation (Exhibit A) noting that the project they're being briefed on is a 42 acre site on the corner of Wall and Hunziker Streets. It is about collaboration between the City of Tigard and private sector partners to successfully develop a large and well located, but physically challenging, site. Christine McKelvey of McKenzie came up to provide a deeper level of detail. She went over an updated condensed presentation (Exhibit B) of what she distributed to all of the commissioners. There were some questions regarding working with the topography of the area as well as recommended zoning for the area. Ms. McKelvey said they would plan to work with the Page 3 of 4 existing topography of the area, retaining as many trees as possible; the buildings would step down. Mr. Hering of Norris, Biggs and Simpson said he'd been in the real estate industry for 40 years and has worked with the City of Tigard for almost a dozen. He said what the commissioners are seeing before them is the result of a process which he believes is very unique —lead by Tigard reaching out saying "Let's come up with something realistic." Group McKenzie put it on paper and made a presentation but this is an attempt to take a piece of dirt that has sat in this market for a long time. Mr. Fields wrote real property checks for $60,000/70,000 a year. We can create an investment in the next 24.months that will generate $500,000 to $700,000 of real property taxes and it is real. It's up there on a paper put together by the planners but it isn't driven by the planners. This isn't pie in the sky. Eric (Sporn) is a risk taker. He wouldn't have committed to this process if he didn't believe this risk was worthy of taking. We wouldn't have committed if we didn't believe we have a product we can sell. I hope you'll consider that. President Rogers said he thought the presentation was fantastic. "It allows for the commission to take a look at something with such a colorful history for both the City of Tigard and Mr. Fields. It's an exciting possibility of what could be in the future. Some of the questions were geared around making sure that we don't have something that "looks the part" of what we envision Tigard is in the future. We don't want something piecemealed. We're at the 10,000 ft level, not down in the weeds. I also love the idea of the public/private partnership thing that's going on. I like how the city's partnering with lots of different entities outside to look into and spur economic development and develop a piece, hopefully, that will be a well-planned out community and a well-planned out vision of the City of Tigard. What are you looking for from the Planning Commission?" Christine McKelvey answered: "There's a long road ahead. This is just the beginning of the brick road. We certainly want to march down it feeling confident that we're moving forward with something that is going to gage support. Obviously there are lots of details to work through but we're here to go through this public process in order to get the zone changed and there are lots of other technical details that need to get worked out but we want to have your general support for this if you feel it's appropriate." President Rogers said he likes the concept. Aesthetically,we want it to look a certain way and I think all of us are sensitive to that. I say trudge ahead; any other concerns? One of the commissioners said his main concern was that the issue of livability is considered. OTHER BUSINESS —None. ADJOURNMENT President Rogers adjourned the meeting at 8:38 p.m. Doreen Laughlin,Planning Co -ssion Secretary A ES . • si.rI —as ent as.n Rogers Page 4 of 4 CITY OF TIGARD Fields Update . • ... ..„• _ .. • .„,,, • ••,. . • , . ,..,„:,. . .. Project, Partners a and Pro e s. , , • 1.• f• ^C ry'�►^ - / e • f'' • ; +` ............., .:, I, ....6....,........ ` - ` . i I ..., j .a'r 1 �1 F.��`R sYi.ar.:�1 t. .ti . r .1.1.6. -.r CITY OF TIGARD Project: 42 acres on the corner of Wall and Hunziker Streets Collaboration between City of Tigard and private sector partners to successfully develop a large and well located, but physically challenging site. • Relevant Issues -• ,, • Maximizing employment potential. . -f :._1 • Infrastructure that supports connectivity. - . - -*; ;-M '- - • Market demand and supply. - _ -, ,,._ - .� • Marketabilityof site. � � . . - -F. • Value of site to seller and buyer. - - - 4 �` • Development costs. CITY OF TIGARD Partners: Public & private sector professionals with local knowledge. Interested developers, a motivated land owner, and a willing municipal partner. • . .,.:• . Who's at the table? • City of Tigard w . • Fields Trust • Norris Biggs & Simpson jde • Pa cTr u st 40, • McKenzie CITY OF TIGARD Process: This is the beginning. Through two collaborative meetings in January we've explored what the "highest and best use" and the "right mix of uses" for the site means for each stakeholder. Next Steps? • Update to Council • Concept refinement • . 5 • Land use process - '`Oft-- • Sale of Site • • Developments CITY OF TIGARD Fields Update Findings : Development Analysis and Opportunity Study FIELDS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS AND OPPORTUNITY STUDY February 6, 2014 1 .1 Size: 42.5 acres 1 i" A. \\ /r ,rte . ---..% Site and Surroundinci Propertiez L Location: Just south of 217 and west of �' -� ; •<��ti4 '� —� SW 72nd Avenue exit .r - . ;,x ' N\ , i - i. 1111 lik iir - pie•1 i w 4 } Zoning: I P, C-P, and R-3.5 INEINI111111 ' ' . /4 41): ..- r41 • moi« C-P I IL_ i zhiss -,, . yr . EU , - ,;. li . . . . . N Comp Plan Designation: IL, CP, and L A_' .:, lilt \., , ii; . i_ . irk ' k \ I 'IMII 1 I P i emi ,.. _ . . ,,,. „,,. .\\ \\,:f. , \ . . ....- . , Street Frontage: Approx. 345' along 'ke \ -.1 ,r. , ' I_ , - 11������ SW Hunziker Road, contains private \ I I/ ,.... 1. -�— street (SW Wall Street) on west side — - t • CA'1-77--T-1 \\ . 11 ... . _ . _ , Topography: 4-5% slope on western I '!*"�- r ink Ilk, liiii, 114 ' Ea . - Mt r-,_A. I side, 10-12% on eastern side logo " =lin IN's, V ' -Ii ir ilia . • LI±,___74 - # r Existing Features: Remaining row of - 1-P _ ; �/ I trees on eastern property line; unused q ,.Y% _ , . . :�. — rail spur along (private) SW Wall Street Llipnin' '� v: --' \ : , , . .. . \ . r, . ! -1 Wetlands: Low-quality wetland area - IIIII- , , near northwest corner (Clean Water ili �� �` �` Services Vegetated Corridor) =NM . � � \ .. . . _ -. . \ \ :,_.4 • '•i ill 11 _ . ' ICEld 1,....q .. _.,, ._ ! . ,..,.. . ..., Fields Trust February 6,2014 11 . 1DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINT , The property has been on the market for several years with much interest from the development community; however, development has thus far been unfeasible. The general location is desirable only for a limited set of uses, and there are significant topographical challenges with the uses allowed under the current zoning designation of I-P. Previously considered uses include a bus barn for Tigard-Tualatin School District, City Public Works use, industrial development, and multi-family residential. Primary Issues ( urrou ding Properties, and o " Existing Conditions and Topography '` •- .41k 1. Slope and configuration of majority of site not suitable forRail Spur , ' market-scale development allowed under current I-P zoning , (e.g. 200' wide/deep or larger industrial/employment use Low-Grade Wetland (Clean Water Services- buildings) designated Vegetated Corridor) -1'js�. . 2. Slope of SW Hunziker Road not adequate for truck access SLOPE -•1) ,'� �9./.97 2. f , lon north-P zonin side existingf to rt wed uses g ° g 0 \p 6.1 -10% Ss0 4-5%) / s 1 , 3. Transportation System Plan (TSP) designation and width 10.1 -?% 0 Qin Rd�� of SW Wall Street (private) between adjacent development r c•� S'd4f- � and rail spur not wide enough for City Collector standards , -' r� (SW Wall Street designated as future Collector on City's ~' • G TSP) , •• , � d _ -.4, �'�a eget - SecondaryIssues " .` r A. �Y /' % . <, dtec,C tt14\4 'f*:47 27 • c\ iiii;oi t-iiiii 1. Wetland area in flattest portion of site (low quality) ,,e' /' .\C) _ 2. Remaining trees along eastern property line (both positive -- and negative factor) i * - 3. Limited access to site for some uses from Hwy 217, SW / ,.nli ' Q 72nd Avenue, and Hwy 99W on existing roads �':* i _opmpliFilormerwromp•it. , 4. Possible Noise from adjacent railroad switching yard could f Y . 4 , ; ...> i Low Density Housing (R-3.5) impact possible uses depending on needs -4,,,1, ":, ,ter t N ki r.%., 1111111111 ,„ -,,, t I Ittalitill III (') , . . Fields Property Development Analysis M 2130474.01 ■ _• � Example: Small industrial building (150-200' wide) - •�'' , /,.. ouistln9 wry-�' i - Approximate locptiari • of cros tiokt Primary Constraint 1: Slope and Example: Typical small office (100' wide) Configuration/Zoning • For western portion of the site's current zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation =. .. =-- -IME- fi (IL), with the site's slope and configuration, allowed uses such as small industrial exi5ling Lopuy�'Gra2,L - . ____ - buildings (150-200' wide) would require a 20-30' high retaining wall and/or extensive grading, which has been found to be cost prohibitive for previous potential buyers • Smaller buildings such as offices would require partial basements and a smaller Example: Retail/Mixed-Use/Residential (50' wide) retaining wall, or more extensive grading which has been found to be cost prohibitive for this use • Narrow buildings such as multi-family residential or mixed-use buildings could be built _______iLia__ - a 1 into the slope with small retaining wall required (however, current zoning does not , Aim �rapnY , support housing as an allowed use) 'stir ' Primary Constraint 2: Slope of SW Hunziker Road _,T� ,- ` • The majority of the slope along the property frontage of SW Hunziker Road (only y public street frontage) is approximately 10%, which is too steep for trucks servicing - .-- . . allowed uses on site (4-5% is the maximum possible) ' -' •; # _-• - a • Optimum vehicle access off of SW Hunziker Road is at SW Wall Street (currently a "�°- = = ,:�. F - private street). Hunziker Road is steeply sloped for most of the which has been found .Nz ' :. ::_ = ,. • I ' - . to be inadequate for truck turning radius and is restricted by the existing rail spur t': I _ y ` . 14 i _ 4ar.,,i, / It , • , Site on SW Hunziker Road Facing East Fields Trust FPhn iary F 2n14 rit, r) NTEx ",_ 11 . MARK The market strength of potential future uses of the Fields Property was discussed at the two workshops with City staff, the owner and local industry/development experts; the need for and interest in potential uses that can be supported by the current market was identified by local developers and real estate brokers with experience in the Tigard area and reviewed with the workshop team in order to feasibly develop employment lands on the Fields Property. Identified High Market Demand in the Area: • Light industrial/smaller office/flex (5,000-7,500 SF tenant spaces within larger building footprints). Typically need 150' deep x 250' wide buildings with 50' truck bays • Multi-family residential (workforce to mid-range, would also support adjacent industrial and employment uses). Good location, strong market demand -, Multi-Family Reside .d:,- .-e..,- '~ - .;..fr...--' = — .h dustrial/Flex Example MO/ -- - -, _ w A + ' ••• - •• :mss - --. '" j lir ''- '\ ir. I Illi y , 1.^�.+• ■� , 1v. �I .� mac' F u..(1 �- 0, iiri , 1 , . ■®p . . - ��. - , ,f•• 36 �' fd'. ..1 f�`f!�''.3._ %4 lr . w- '.i _.-"�:;• „ 11 , _z c N. ::$4.::, J T::1 ii s* s r �i. _ � scE, 1F l r a lis Pill 11.."4: ' , � ` II... I .' wyy� r .i _I 4 S .a '4 X11 r-_,,,/0::... • 414'': �ti �'1wr..� �w,� 111111.1"41* r ., A ,. -rT lielll f ' _ ... 1 ,. i.... .1„Ll _____ • 1. i . .-_. .ic____L_,I.-A . ._ A_ ,. LAI , 1 - , 4-.-A-..r. '''''''.:,' '.'''': ".'s .---- ----- ____. ,. Identified Low Market Demand in the Area: • Class A Office in suburban areas (e.g.: Kruse Way scale and location) Rents have not increased significantly since the late 1990's, but construction costs have. • Retail Not close enough to freeway interchange. Only specialty "destination" big-box (with little to no pedestrian traffic) might be supported, but site is too sloped to accommodate it. Restaurants (location too far from main roads, other retail) • Specialty Recreation (e.g. fitness centers-demand more retail-centered areas) • "Live/work" spaces in suburban areas (without city center co-location to services and transit) Fields Property Development Analysis M 2130474.01 ■ 16 111 . 2 DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS Subarea 1 .�'y ''z Opp, 'Fq \ '7gf • Subarea 1 contains slopes closer to the eleva- Fy,NL,f:� 7� } tion of SW Wall Street and could be easily Site Subareas ` � ,,r;•, . 4,')i6-,,,, , J accessed from that street. Thisportion of the , 'f N9so Subarea 1: Western Side (Least Sloped) site is less steeply slope (existing wetland - 1 would need to be mitigated and/or accommo- Subarea 2: Eastern Side (Most Sloped) !}� ov r,, dated) ' -': \ ,, • The Shape of subarea 1 is more appropriate to �- - �� ems-. ` � �`'' , accommodate small industrial buildings, flex/ h` T gq offices, retail, or other commercial use as cur- i , . ',Az. -�= rently zoned (I-P) �A� _ ,� �; � `� • Additional access could make this portion of = _ # •�1■ �r r the site more feasible for development if SW '' - • rt; - • , 1 'r . .' �.•- �,ra"+gnu Tech Center Drive was extended west and/or a ,.1 :• '� '� l — -- . -�.. ��o f secondary access was added off of SW Hun- �, ir ,+r-c'te �ly v. _ _,,, ��. _ — _ _ y��1- s .�� kr �• `4 ! �" �$�t i�.. � ��r 1� � ziker (would be steeply sloped) "" "__- - .t CCC��� s $, 'mss, , - • '' ` k n t /1 tk, Subarea 2 ; �� � Subarea ti :, , t. • Subarea 2 has a steeper slope (10% +/-), with _ , ,.4ao 2a acres,,. • f no current access off of SW Hunziker. This por- °�"% t . = T. g shaped , A- Su • area 2 mdteq/ _. • _ .,. , ; , - . tion of the site is non-rectangular and • �� contains a significant number of existing trees Approx. pt'i0I?) = `; ` ,,i�' At Le • Additional access could make this portion of V 22.5 acres / the site more feasible for development if SW .,.--- s ' ;,' , ''` ` Tech Center Drive was extended west and/or a ; " ` � � ` # secondary access was added off of SW Hun- 1e / r"'� '� _T ti /£ it ,,. �� N s , . � _ 6 ziker (would be steeply sloped) l � ! ti °,� :. .r 'iEC CEN U• P+1fM' svr "2i1"'HILIs� ��?, #t • Subarea 2 does not easily accommodate �-,'` `�' ' industrial, larger office, retail, or other com- (� r �,; p �� -� ,i mercial buildings due to topographycon- Ili g ;' ff'71 -' +: . ',. is straints and access. Smaller buildings with less r > , ;t intensive access needs (such as multi-family ' ), z e Apo soy 1 � a-- - - H - �" housing and small scale office uses) are better v ijC .W� �, : ft 1 ; suited to the steep slopes, significant number '�`I , w .. of trees and surrounding residential uses. . . 1'1 � l i Fields Trust February 6,2014 Note: This plan is not intended to be a proposed development plan for the site. It is intended to serve as an example of how the site could be developed Site-Appropriate to maximize employment and support residential uses inaway that would be Hypothetical Marketable, Develo ment Concept* feasible under current market conditions. k i ■ I I. f Based on previous market studies and develop- w V. ment options available on the property over the Potential Buildings/Uses (Approx.) ., '``1\ past few years, participants at the two workshops 1 I held in January 2014 determined that a hypotheti- ' 174,000 SF Industrial (43,500 SF Buildings) x� ., • '►,, , 4 cal, marketable plan is needed to determine the Ns, ''� 40,000 SF Flex/Commercial (One 2-story building) �� e )1111:0417# capacity of the subareas to accommodate the , maximum amount of employment lands for the 324,000 SF Multi-Family Residential site given size, slope, location, and configuration. (27,000 SF Buildings) ; , fes_ This concept plan represents a hypothetical, mar- �� � / �` Truck Access Tom' , ketable development concept scheme. Specific s..'�.� / , �! �, uses and tenant types have not been identified; Vehicle Access ,_ the intent was to identify the most appropriate — ', '� Existing and Potential ',/ f` A il zoning and use designation that could be sup- Future Connections ported by the development sector and would sup- a, from Public Streets J ` 3 , •port the City's need for maintaining and increas- +1 ,, ing employment lands in the district. _ -' ZONE / : • /ral MUE ZONE Subarea 1 �/ This potential site plan accommodates a mix of • employment intense flex/light industrial build- / • • ApprOx. 2�` • ings, office uses, and multi-family residential f �/ ` • �~ • Subarea 1 could accommodate several poten- . • �' // ♦ ` 20 acres 1 E tial uses but the high demand for small Indus- - - , - trial spaces was determined to better meet the "' • Subarea 2 • . ;' p / ' :, Approx. •`�.��� �, market demands and regional industrial land ,�,( 22.5 acres 17-11. needs • Subarea 2 is less flexible due to constraints ��_ Potential buffer to existing house - – \ �'/ 4 mentioned previously in this analysis. This ... ♦ T area was deemed appropriate for providing o -4"_ till • - needed housing or other smaller footprint ,T , . '$ li: t' r '- �- -� uses on steepest slope areas with the intent of _ •' . di _ J ' "� preserve as many mature trees around develo- • TM A. ' f ment as possible 4 ;:'r' • • IF .111. 41 =4 - ! i� Ike r - r ' .. - ., tLtJPlbk Y • Fields Property Development Analysis 2130474.01 ■ Public Improvements Identified to Support Maximum Potential Development Concept ASSUMPTIONS: Transportation Imrpovements • Subarea 1 can be accessed from SW Wall Public Street Improvements Required / dee\, Street (currently private, unimproved) Off-Site Improvement (Requires adjacent property ,a• • Subarea 2 can be accessed from SW Hunziker owner cooperation) / c> Road at top of hill (auto access only) and from �0� - a potential future connection along SW Tech Potential Future Off Site Improvements O� / ':;:?,:t Center Drive at the southern property G NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS: 5($\ Oyes • Connect SW Tech Center Drive at the south- d')' east corner of the site to SW Wall Street (make �a��� %� �c//S IN... SW Wall Street public). Cannot be done in cur- tr rent configuration; options include: el_ i‘s&witit eet �� .J • SW Wall Street changed to Local Indus- ��� • trial/Commercial to match SW Tech Center •• ��� m r _ � Drive � • Remove rail spur, install standard Minor Z. Cie Z�� 211111 Approx. Collector street Improvements110111 L��� �oK- ® 20 acres - • Potential need to install traffic signal at SW c� Wall Street/SW Hunzikeri t** ��d00_ 2,(....„1.7,.,.,,_ k �+'� „ ; 2-7 L- �� � Approx. ,��� Add POTENTIAL OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS: ��1 -- 22.5 acres �,� jAPIP �I traffic • Improve intersections of SW Hunziker Road L .a - Signal? and SW 72nd Avenue/SW Hunziker Road/SW • ' _ •• 444 r' Hall Boulevard iier City support - • Pedestrian/bike connection over tracks via . / work with adjacent ped/bike bridge to public open space to the property owner to dedicate - %- south % It‘ / ‘L‘. 4tD • ,-, O Ally ZOO . . N I ,'� L . v) O U , Q. i ,-, I � OE I 111 Fields Trust February 6,2014 ONlNC DTION „ The following epresents the findings of two workshops held in January 2014, and includes recommended zoning options to achieve the highest and best use of the entire Fields Property Potential Zoning Conducive to Marketable Development Concept • The site currently is zoned a mix of l-P, C-P, Proposed Zoning/Uses and R-3.5 Most of the site is zoned l-P; resi- i-P Zoning (Approx. 20 Acres) / dential uses not allowed. The proposed mar- ketable scheme includes rezoning a portion of MUE Zoning (Approx. 22.5 acres) the site to reflect market conditions and land suitability. Possible uses include work-force housing on the steepest portion of the site to support employment lands. . . \,,, ., R 4.5 i ��5� •....--.....I...,,....../, l � / 1rAi3.r SITE MUE ubarea 1 • _ • LEGEND 0 Site 2-VIOar' / Approx. "�._ Zoning District • - =C _ ¢° / 00 20 acres \. -C-P • 411, '''.1%.,N., % H }J/ • R•3.5 R-252/10011111 V • 71c P 40401111r -MUCBD00- A ro P44* R-12 MUE1 �7/�22.5 acres / R-25 R25 R•2S / . I•p R35 , R-45 5 I ♦ IN f • • Zoning that would accommodate the pro- posed marketable development concept r include: • Subarea 1: Remain I-P ; 21 L NELOPMENT ECONOMICS/ F . ASIBILITY Over the course of the past few years, several development feasibility studies have been completed by developers looking at the property. Outlined below are highlights from various cost studies completed by PacTrust Development. Note that this data is preliminary and is was developed in order to determine development feasibility with the site being developed as it currently is zoned (I- P), and also to look at feasibility with approximately 50% of the site being rezoned to MUE. These numbers are based on current market values and are estimates only for purposes of determining development feasibility, return on investment, and economic value to the City of Tigard. EXHIBIT A below outlines the site conditions as they exist today in section. Undeveloped. EXHIBIT B illustrates a section through the site highlighting the maximum development poten- tial for the site with the site's current zoning (I-P). With the current zoning and market conditions, approximately 20 acres could be developed with a total build out of approximately 175,000sf. The I-P Zone R-3.5 Zone total site coverage would be a maximum of 20% Slope < 10% Slope > 10% of the site. The estimated cost of development < Existing I excluding land costs is $22,100,000 ($126/sf) - , Residential including necessary off-site improvements, nec- -, +� 66' essary grading, permits and fees. The extraor- 2 "=1 01106 ..r+ cu Existing 4-, a- r 1 dinary costs, due to site constraints, that must Industrial v1 _ r - - I- be absorbed by this development are between Building g o _ - -- - - I $2,600,000 and $3,000,000. That equates to 0! 2 1 an additional $12-$15/SF of additional cost that �' -- - ' Q � must be added on to the building costs, creating Exhibit A: Existing;Site Condition a development cost premium of 25-40%. In this I-P Zone R-3.5 Zone scenario, and even without the cost of land pur- Slope < 10% Slope > 10% I Existing chase, the project is not financially feasible. (Refer I I Residential to the separately attached cost comparison of Business Park Development Costs). a v v 66' Existing cn Ti I�r�w"iri•. c v Industrial — ra I. EXHIBIT C illustrates a section through the Building f° 1 site highlighting the proposed zone change for . . . . . . . �� o approximately 22 acres as well as potential devel- u' . . . . . . . . . 'a h opment as allowed in the MUE zone. With this Exhibit B: Maximum Development for I-P Zone use w/o rezone-NOT financially viable Possible Tree Buffgr proposed scenario, development costs are shared I-P Zone MUE-2 V R-3.5 Zone by feasible development across the full extent Slope < 10% Slope > 10% of the site, bringing the extraordinarysite devel- ...0„ Existing g g I Residential opment costs to approximately $750,000. The same industrial development identified in Exhibit w -, �I11103# 1 66' B could occur (175,000sf) on the 20 acres of I-P Existing 2 - l t zoned property, but an additional 22 acres of MUE Industrial - r -- Alli "" r� 1 ' Ill development could occur on the eastern portion Building To o _ _ _ - - �� of the site, bringing the estimated cost of devel- - - - - - - ~ ` 12 creat- ingopmentinlinewithmarketdemandsand `" 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - ° a viable development solution that will bring Exhibit C: Possible Development for property with partial MUE-2 Rezone development to employment lands in the City of Tigard. Fields Property Development Analysis M 2130474.01 ■ 22 I115 NEEDS ■ How can the owner and development team work with the City to develop the Fields Property such that employment lands can be created? Highest and Best Use of the Property (based on the market, site features, and regional needs): highest and best use: "the reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or an improved property, which is physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that results in the highest value." — Appraisal Institute, The Appraisal of Real Estate Primary Constraints: Possible Solutions: 1. Slope and configuration of site not suitable 1. Re-zone a portion of the site for less inten- for market-scale industrial/employment uses sive use that better accommodates smaller (as majority of site is currently zoned) building footprints and surrounding residential uses. 2. Slope of SW Hunziker Road not adequate for 2. Re-zone site for more appropriate use and truck access on north side of site allow secondary site access along Hunziker 3. TSP designation and width of SW Wall Street 3. Re-designate SW Wall Street to classification (private) between adjacent buildings and rail with narrower standard spur not wide enough for City Collector stan- dards (SW Wall Street designated as future Collector on City's TSP) 4. Limited Freight Access and Connectivity 4. Connect SWWaII Street to SW Tech Center Drive Fields Trust February 6,2014 70MPARISON rOSTS 111 . 6 D _ VELOPMEN - i PacTrust Development has successfully developed over 10,000,000 square feet of industrial and flex/office space, with most of that happening in and around the Willamette Valley area. In an effort to realistically look at business park development costs of the Fields Property in comparison to other recently developed properties in the area, PacTrust has assisted the team with compiling actual development costs of a recently completed industrial flex/office project of similar scale and density to estimated development costs on the Fields Property in Tigard. FIVE OAKS WEST BUSINESS COMPARISON OF BUSINESS PARK DEVELOPMENT COSTS: PARK, HILLSBORO, OREGON FIVE OAKS WEST BUSINESS PARK VS. FIELDS TRUST PROPERTY Five Oaks West Business Park is located in the Development Coverage: Five Oaks West, Beaverton: Fields Trust Property, Tigard: high-tech area of Hillsboro, Oregon. Currently a (Includes land area readily available and 34% Coverage 21% Coverage 34,875 square foot flex building is operational and appropriate for development) a pre-leased 54,000 square foot building is under construction. The total developed square footage is approximately 167,000 square feet. Fees and Permits: Fees and Permits: Fees and Permits: Soils and Environmental $.30/sf $.54/sf Architectural and Engineering $2.43/sf $2.87/sf 41111111111 Landscape Architecture $.17/sf $.39/sf e� Surveying -f� $.19/sf $.16/sf 4 4t,. . . . --- I, . Y- Testing $.32/sf $.35/sf - " Fees and Permits $6.87/sf $8.12/sf Total: $10.28/sf $12.43/sf _ -- • Construction Costs: Construction Costs: Construction Costs: Offsite and Streets $.38/sf $5.77/sf New Public Street needed I Sitework $7.35/sf $25.97/sf Significant slopes/grading NW pJNEFFRM PLACE 1 Landscape $2.10/sf $4.68/sf Coverage Hard Construction $26.61/sf $29.87/sf Price Increases 309 Contingency $2.31/sf $8.26/sf 10%vs 5% 4tiE6 • Total: $38.75 $74.55 l Capitalized Interest: $1.16/sf $2.61/sf I' ' 311 cauar 310 p.k'' FIIi11RE FUTURE Tenant Improvements: $11.75/sf $11.75/sf Cost Prior to Land Purchase: $61.94 $101.34 The cost/sf of building development for the Fields Property is estimated to be 61% more than a typical business park development of similar size and density. r,' aill_ / N W CARPER PLACE Fields Property Development Analysis lvi ■