01/10/1978 - Packet TIGARD WATER DISTRICT 3341 s. W• COMMERCIAL ST.
TIGARD, OREGON 97223
PHONE (503) 639-1554
'+Mlrr'
January 10, 1978
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
1. RESOLUTION TO APPROVE MINUTES OF LAST
MEETING
2. VISITORS
3. RESOLUTION TO PAY VOUCHERS
4. APPOINTMENT OF BUDGET OFFICER FOR FY
1978-79 AND COMMITTEE TO ESTABLISH
EMPLOYEE PAY SCALE COMMENCING JULY 1,
1978
5. RESOLUTION TO ADOPT TIME SCHEDULE TO
DEVELOP THE WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILSON-
;,, VILLE AS A SOURCE OF WATER UTILIZING A
BOND ELECTION DATE OF AUGUST 8 , 1978
6. OTHER BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT
ADMINISTRATOR' S REPORT
460.
1. Resolution to approve minutes of last meeting.
2. Visitors.
3. Resolution to pay vouchers.
4. Appointment of Budget Officer for FY 1978-79 and
committee to establish employee pay scale, commencing
July 1, 1978.
A budget officer should be selected for the new
budget, commencing July 1, 1978. Next month, names of
five (5) other individuals will be suggested for appoint-
ment to make up the ten (10) member budget committee.
In accordance with a recommendation last year by
one of the commissioners, a special committee (2 or 3
'"""" members consisting of commissioners and employees)
should be appointed to review and consider the proposed
employees ' salary scale for the next fiscal year; and
be prepared to submit such pay scale to the Board of
Commissioners for approval prior to submission to the
budget committee.
As an initial projection of the budget document I
would envision it being a very simple, austere budget.
Of major importance is the final decision of the Oregon
State Supreme Court on the Lake Oswego lawsuit. The
contested amount is now substantial and will have a
significant effect upon the budget. An early decision
by the judges would be helpful because, with a large bond
issue contemplated, an unqualified opinion by the auditor
is mandatory in obtaining the lowest interest rates.
Consumer rates have not been raised since April 1975.
Rate increases have normally occurred about every three
years, but with luck, we can make it to 1979 . Much depends
upon Portland and Lake Oswego, however.
With the internal capital improvements , distribution
and storage, in excellent shape and equipment on hand,
except small tools, essentially adequate, a major effort
must be directed toward alleviating the administrative
burden in the office, particularly in the billing depart-
ment. Either more part-time help must be provided or the
two office girls authorized overtime pay. The latter may
be preferable due to the limited space in the office.
-1-
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued)
Funds were budgeted this year for studying the type
of computerized billing system to adopt. However, prior
to expending these funds, it would be prudent to observe
the new billing systems now employed at both Wolf Creek
and Metzger. Also, Wolf Creek may have excess used equip-
ment that could meet our needs.
Status of the bond construction fund will not be
known until the Lake Oswego lawsuit is settled.
5. Resolution to adopt time schedule to develop the
Willamette River at Wilsonville as a source of water
utilizing a bond election date of August 8, 1978.
As directed at the last meeting, a proposed time
schedule has been prepared and is attached to the end
of this report. Obviously, much needs to be accomplished
with pitfalls all along the way. The whole project, as
conceived, is vulnerable. If successful, it will be the
"coup de grace"of our association with the water district.
6. Other business.
7. 10-MG Reservoir
Work on the 10-MG reservoir is slow at this time.
Some of the delay occurred as a result of our personnel
constructing the control vault which had to be finished
prior to filling the reservoir. Of course, the weather
has been the biggest limiting factor for any delay.
The General Contractor has been granted an extension
of time until February 15th for completion. A list of
deficiencies was prepared and most are to be finished
prior to January 15th. This list also contained a time
schedule for cleaning and sterilizing the tank.
Filling of the reservoir will begin on January 16th,
with a total elapsed time of 25 days for both filling and
testing. If all goes well with the testing (for leaks) ,
backfilling can commence immediately thereafter, weather
permitting.
-2-
ADMINISTRATOR' S REPORT (Continued)
8. Unmetered Water.
Pumped Purchased Total Sold Loss
Month & Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Loss
Year x 1000 x 1000 x 1000 x 1000 x 1000 %
Dec 1977 83 7, 230 (L.0. ) 7, 313 6, 008 1, 305 17 . 8%
-0- (Port)
Total: 9, 688 46, 566 56, 254 55, 287 967 1. 7%
(6 months)
9. Water pumped from wells, Calendar Year 1977 .
Month Actual *Actual Allocation
1977 Cubic Feet Acre-Feet Acre-Feet Remarks
Jan 1, 955, 100 44 . 9 88 (#3 & #4 off)
Feb 1, 795, 820 41. 2 88 (#3 & #4 off)
Mar 2, 081, 770 47. 8 88 (#3 & #4 off)
Apr 3, 068, 550 70. 4 88 (#3 & #4 off)
(& #1 deepened)
May 3, 224 , 240 74. 0 88 (#4 off & #3 off
3/4 month)
Jun 3, 235, 440 74. 2 88 (#4 off)
Jul 1, 478, 780 34 . 0 88 (#1 & #4 off)
Aug 3, 837,780 88.1 88
Sep 4 , 037 , 070 92. 7 88
Oct 251, 560 5. 8 88 (All wells off
Oct 3rd)
Nov -0- -0- 88 (All wells off)
Dec 82, 870 1. 9 88 (#1, #2, & #3 off)
Total: 25, 048, 980 575. 0 1, 056
* 1 Acre-Foot = 43, 560 Cubic Feet
Actually pumped in prior years: 1974 : 924 Acre-Feet
1975: 930 Acre-Feet
1976: 847 Acre-Feet
-3-
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued)
Now
10. Percentage of Bull Run water purchased for computing
amount due for Systems Development Charge.
Month & Well Lake Oswego Portland Total %
Year Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Bull Run
Jul 1977 1,478, 780 8, 090, 600 2 ,065,700 11, 635,080 17 . 75%
Aug 1977 3, 837, 780 5, 992, 800 5,198 ,400 15,028 ,980 34 . 59%
Sep 1977 4,037 , 070 4, 020, 900 657 ,400 8, 715,370 7. 54%
Oct 1977 251, 560 7, 087, 000 -0- 7 , 338 ,560 0. 00%
Nov 1977 -0- 7,176, 700 300 7,177, 000 0. 00%
Dec 1977 82, 870 7, 229, 800 300 7 ,312 , 970 0. 00%
Total: 9, 688, 060 39, 597, 800 7 , 922,100 57 ,207 ,960 13 . 85%
(6 months)
Summary of water purchased and/or pumped and water losses .
FY Well Lake Oswego Portland Water Loss
1973-74 48% 52% -0- 11. 1%
1974-75 40% 59% 1% 16. 2%
1975-76 39% 59% 2% 7. 4%
1976-77 33% 65% 2% 5. 5%
1977-78 (6 mo. ) 17% 69% 14% 1. 7%
-4-
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued)
11. Work accomplished during December 1977 .
a. TWD installed 180 feet of 4" D. I. pipe from
both 125th Avenue (60 feet) and Bull Mountain Road (120
feet) to serve fire lines to 10-MG reservoir (for clean-
ing tank) . Also, 100 feet of 12" D. I . pipe was installed
to serve future pump station to be located at north side
of reservoir above control vault.
b. TWD installed fire hydrant at S. W. Rose Vista
and Gaarde Street.
c. Private contractor installed 200 feet of 6" D.I.
pipe and 195 feet of 4" D. I. pipe + 1 fire hydrant for
development of 8 houses on Watkins Street, north of Derry
Dell Court. (WATKINS PARK) .
d. Private contractor installed 1900 feet of 8" D. I .
pipe, 1400 feet of 6" D. I. pipe + 6 fire hydrants for 59
single family dwellings and 12 duplexes located at S. W.
88th Avenue, north of Durham Road. (STRATFORD) .
e. TWD installed 13 meters. (5310 - 5298) .
District also serves 41 meters out-of-district.
Total: 5, 351
12. Work to be accomplished during remainder of Fiscal
Year 1977-78.
January 1978:
a. TWD install 700 feet of 12" D. I . , 1 ,370 feet of
6" D.I. , 240 feet of 4" D. I. pipe + 3 fire hydrants for new
development of 39 single family homes along Serena Court
and Kimberly Drive, near 98th and Durham Road. (KERWOOD) .
b. TWD install 120 feet of 24" concrete cylinder
pipe + 1 manhole along Hazeltree Drive to drain 10-MG
reservoir into drainage system of Hazeltree subdivision.
c. TWD install 980 feet of 12" D.I . and 1,400 feet
of 6" D. I. pipe along Gaarde, 121st, and access road to
#2 reservoir to replace 6" O.D. steel pipe, pressurize 23
homes on Rose Vista Drive, and prepare for service line to
36" D. I. transmission main along S. W. Gaarde, including a
pressure-reducing valve in concrete vault.
d. Private contractor install 1,535 feet of 6" D.I .
pipe + 3 fire hydrants along Cresmer Drive and Renee Drive,
near Ash and Garrett Streets, for new development of 37
single family dwellings. (BEREA)
-5-
ADMINISTRATOR' S REPORT (Continued)
February 1978:
a. TWD install altitude control valve at #2
reservoir and adjust altitude control valves at all
other reservoirs in preparation of utilizing 10-MG
reservoir as the terminal reservoir.
b. TWD install 340 feet of 6" D. I. pipe + 1 fire
hydrant along S. W. 111th Place, north of Fonner Street,
for new development of 13 single family dwellings.
(WILDERNESS) .
c. Private contractor backfill and landscape 10-MG
reservoir site.
d. Private contractor install 300 feet of 36" D.I.
pipe and 300 feet of 24" concrete cylinder pipe (drain
line) from 10-MG reservoir to Corylus Court.
e. Private contractor install 1, 040 feet of 6" D.I .
pipe + 3 fire hydrants for Phase II of ALDERBROOK APART-
MENTS (63 units) , and 560 feet of 6" D. I . pipe + 2 fire
hydrants for Phase III of ALDERBROOK APARTMENTS . (63 units) .
,r,,. (SUMMERFIELD) (TDC) .
March 1978:
a. TWD install 680 feet of 12" D.I. pipe along S .W.
Hazeltree Drive and 440 feet of 6" D. I. pipe + 1 fire
hydrant along Duchilly Court to serve remaining 19 single
family dwelling sites for Mr. Robert and Gary Ames.
(HAZELTREE) .
b. TWD install 1, 300 feet of 12" D. I. pipe + 2 fire
hydrants along S. W. 72nd Avenue, Kable to Upper Boones
Ferry Road, to serve new commercial development. (Equities
Northwest) .
c. Private contractor install 990 feet of 6" D.I .
pipe + 2 fire hydrants for development of 15 single family
dwellings on S. W. Pathfinder Way, 107th Court to Walnut
Street. (YOLO ESTATES) .
April 1978:
a. TWD install 1st phase (18 homes) for new develop-
ment of 99 homes near 115th Avenue, between Fairhaven and
Terrace Trails, consisting of 540 feet of 8" D. I. and 320
feet of 4" D. I. + 1 fire hydrant along S. W. Genesis, Nova,
and Venus Avenues. (GENESIS)
-6-
ADMINISTRATOR' S REPORT (Continued)
April 1978 (Continued) :
b. TWD install 100 feet of 8" D. I. , 100 feet of
6" D.I. , and 300 feet of 12" D. I. pipe (under Fanno
Creek) to serve North Dakota Street island, if approved
by patrons
OR
TWD install 700 feet of 6" D.I . pipe + 1 fire
hydrant along S. W. 106th Avenue (old USA Metzger access
road) , north of North Dakota Street, for development of
13 single family dwellings; (NORTHERN PINE) . Also,
install 300 feet of 12" D.I . pipe (under Fanno Creek) to
serve patrons east of the USA access road on North Dakota
Street.
May 1978:
a. TWD install 2,260 feet of 12" D.I . pipe + 4 fire
hydrants from Fern Street pump station to 132nd Avenue
pump station to parallel for pressure and eliminate the
Fern Street pump station.
b. Private contractor install 1, 250 feet of 8" D.I .
pipe, 60 feet of 6" D. I. pipe, and 530 feet of 4" D.I .
pipe + 3 fire hydrants for new development of 30 single
family dwellings located on S. W. 92nd Avenue, north of
Sattler Road. (LAUNALYNDA PARK) .
c. Private contractor install mains near 92nd Avenue,
south of Durham Road, for new development of 75 single
family dwellings. (Donald E. Pollock, Inc. ) .
d. Private contractor install 1,430 feet of 8" D. I. ,
950 feet of 6" D. I . , and 500 feet of 4" D. I. pipe + 4
fire hydrants for new development called SHADOW HILLS con-
sisting of 40 single family dwellings located north of S. W.
Bull Mountain Road, near 117th Avenue.
June 1978:
a. TWD install 640 feet of 8" D. I . pipe along S. W.
141st Avenue, south of Bull Mountain Road, and 1,370 feet
of 6" D.I. pipe on Bull Mountain Road, east of 141st Avenue,
to parallel for pressure and replace 6" O.D. steel pipe.
b. TWD install 640 feet of 8" D.I . and 850 feet of
6" D.I. pipe along easterly extension of Sunrise Lane from
'440B.P.A. to High Tor reservoir to complete circulation loop
and replace 4" O.D. steel pipe.
-7-
TIME SCHEDULE
TO DEVELOP THE WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILSONVILLE
AS A SOURCE OF WATER
Bond Election Date: August 8 , 1978
1978
DATE EVENT
January 12 Submit letter to E.P.A. for approval.
January 12 Submit letter to D.E.Q. for approval.
January 16 Staffs commence work on conditions and
terms of intergovernmental agreement.
February 17 Final date for decision by entities
whether to participate in the project.
February 17 Request State Engineer to approve water
rights for one of the following:
A. Issue permit to Wolf Creek.
(Application #50693)
B. Issue permit to Tigard Water
District if Wolf Creek authorizes
transfer of holder of permit on
their application.
C. Issue permit to Wilsonville with
expanded boundaries.
February 21 Request ST&R to submit written update of
required capital improvements and estimated
cost data therefor.
February 21 Request to Washington County for variance
in County Master Water Plan.
-la-
TIME SCHEDULE (Continued)
1978
DATE EVENT
February 21 Request to Clackamas County to approve
construction of required facilities on
county roads.
February 21 Correspond with PGE on waiver of riparian
water rights on Willamette River.
March 1 Correspond with Army Corps of Engineers
regarding availability and cost of stored
water.
March 1 Referral of tentative intergovernmental
agreement to steering committee.
March 14 Presentation and report by ST&R on updated
study to steering committee and/or all
elected officials of governing bodies.
March 14 to 20 Referral of proposed intergovernmental
(regular monthly agreement to each governing body.
meeting)
44.. March 21 Attorney for each entity commence prepara-
tion of appropriate resolution authorizing
city/district to proceed with bond election.
March 31 Submit plan to Boundary Review Commission
for permission to extend pipeline extra-
territorially. (This approval would include
input from both CRAG and LCDC)
April 11 to 20 A. Approval of each governing body on inter-
(regular monthly governmental agreement, subject to passing
meeting) appropriate bond measure on August 8th.
B. Resolution by each governing body for
authorization to proceed with bond
election
-2a-
TIME SCHEDULE (Continued)
nor
1978
DATE EVENT
April 21 Attorney for each entity commence prepara-
tion of "Notice of Election" , stating date
of election, ballot title, and statement of
purpose, etc. , in accordance with ORS 259 .
090; and obtain "blessing" of approving
bond counsel.
May 3 Public hearing before Boundary Review Com-
mission for permission to extend pipeline
extraterritorially.
June 30 Each entity submit "Notice of Election" to
Elections Officer.
May 4 to
August 7 Publicity and promotion.
August 8 Bond Election
4401.,
-3a-
( ( (
.
GENERAL FUND BUDGET REPORT
ESTIMATE ESTIMATE + OVER
1976-77 1977-78 1976-77 DECEMBER 1977-78 1976-77 DEC. ACCUM. 1977-78 - UNDER
ACCOUNT ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET
Beginning Working Capital 63,833 111,000 172,088 217,550 195,326 63,833 111,000 129,437 + 18,437
INCOME:
406 Meter Installations 224,925 235,300 21,690 22,800 10,130 111,740 117,400 100,330 - 17,070
407 Line Extension Rebate 1,800 3,000 -0- -0- 4,202 -0- 1,500 5,764 + 4,264
408 Miscellaneous Income 34,593 9,000 -0- 1,000 273 2,269 4,500 2,006 - 2,494
412 Interest Income 369 600 -0- 100 -0- 369 300 -0- - 300
418-419 Water Sales 587,754 651,800 44,378 49,100 39,672 318,466 352,500 330,838 - 21 ,662
425 Penalties for Non-Pay 340 600 25 50 30 210 300 225 - 75
427 Sale of Equipment -0- 600 -0- 100 -0- -0- 300 -0- - 300
430 Developer's - 10% Overhead 33,505 24,000 13,272 4,000 653 22,512 12,000 4,418 - 7,582
430-1 Developer's - 8% Engineering 17,950 16,000 9,596 3,000 522 15,794 8,000 3,394 - 4,606
430-2 Developer's - Equipment 8,174 8,000 2,901 1,000 -0- 7,626 4,000 372 - 3,628
430-3 Developer's - Wage Reimbursement 12,142 12,000 3,540 2,000 1 11,441 6,000 685 - 5,315
TOTAL INCOME & WORKING CAPITAL 985,385 1,071,900 267,490 300,700 250,809 554,260 617,800 577,469 - 40,331
EXPENDITURES: Personal Services
500,1,2,3,4 Salaries 159,498 177,904 13,859 14,800 14,510 79,656 89,000 86,735 - 2,265
504-1 Overtime 5,441 7,200 422 600 687 2,906 3,600 4,120 + 520
506,1 ,2 Office Employees 20,422 22,200 1,948 1,900 1,840 ( 10,384 11,100 11,805 + 705
505 Field Labor 26,861 32,996 3,416 1,800 1,675 1- 14,694 16,500 17,621 + 1,121
212,222 240,300 19,645 19,100 18,712 107,640 120,200 120,281 + 81
EXPENDITURES: Material & Services
507 Blue Cross of Oregon - Medical 3,426 7,200 317 600 614 1,739 3,600 3,368 - 232
507-1 Bankers Life Nebraska - Dental 880 1,200 65 100 101 389 600 491 - 109
508 Retirement 7,663 12,600 (262) (450) (357) j 3,832 6,300 5,550 - 750
509 Social Security 11,473 13,200 820 1,100 821 j 5,355 6,600 6,121 - 479
510 State Accident Insurance Fund 10,305 13,200 3,022 3,300 2,909 5,693 6,600 6,391 - 209
511 State Unemployment Compensation 2,451 4,800 -0- 1,200 -0- 618 2,400 969 - 1,431
512 Advertising & Elections 728 600 -0- 200 17 ; -0- 300 17 - 283
514 Equipment Rentals 281 600 (383) 50 71 j 194 300 195 - 105
515 General Insurance 16,495 18,000 92 -0- 46 2,196 1,500 1,500 -0-
516 Miscellaneous Expenses 2,077 1,800 57 150 90 925 900 1,661 + 761
517 Dues & Subscriptions 678 900 -0- 50 25 453 450 439 - 11
518,1,2 Office Supplies 10,126 9,000 722 750 865 3,828 4,500 4,725 + 225
519,1,2 Professional Fees 15,732 10,500 172 -0- 160 10,318 6,000 5,967 - 33
520 Meter Maintenance 4,921 6,000 441 1,000 253 2,702 3,000 1,289 - 1,711
521,1,2,3 Repairs - Lines, Pumps, etc. 4,863 6,000 1 ,599 -0- 332 3,238 3,000 3,625 + 625
. i
.
GENERAL FUND BUDGET REPORT (Cont.)
1
ESTIMATE ESTIMATE + OVER
1976-77 1977-78 1976-77 DECEMBER 1977-78 1976-77 DEC. ACCUM. 1977-78 - UNDER
ACCOUNT ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET
522,1,2,3 Utilities 6,890 7,200 264 600 680 3,019 3,600 3,560 - 40
523 Fire Hydrant Maintenance 2,078 2,400 9 200 -0- 1,253 1,200 12 - 1,188
524 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 5,453 7,200 987 600 382 3,901 3,600 3,243 ' - 357
524-1 Gasoline & Oil 6,376 7,200 537 600 496 3,380 3,600 3,593 - 7
524-2 Tires & Batteries 778 1 ,200 -0- 100 375 426 600 822 + 222
525,1 Water Costs - Electricity 30,766 36,000 2,781 3,000 2,021 16,956 18,000 16,130 - 1,870
525-2 Water Costs - L. 0. & Portland 100,005 112,500 6,227 7,200 10,326 ' 54,242 62,300 80,840 1 + 18,540
526 Interest Expense 984 600 984 -0- -0- 984 -0- -0- I -0-
527 Small Tools 887 1,200 7 100 480 658 600 1,128 + 528
529 Rain Gear, Safety Equip. , etc. 1,025 1,200 189 100 28 583 600 572 - 28
530 Employee Training 433 600 -0- -0- -0- 144 200 -0- ` - 200
247,776 282,900 18,647 20,550 20,735 127,026 140,350 152,208 + 11 ,858
EXPENDITURES: Capital Outlay
548 Fire Hydrants 2,750 2,400 -0- -0- 103 93 1,600 1,700 ' + 100
549 Equipment 73,738 33,200 21 ,388 1,300 1,225 46,683 2,500 2,432 - 68
550 Buildings & Additions -0- 3,600 -0- -0- -0- , -0- -0- -0- -0-
551 Meter Installations 38,063 43,300 3,354 3,500 1,658 24,761 25,900 21,472 - 4,428
552 Land & Improvements 8,434 51,000 I -0- -0- -0- 6,007 41 ,000 41,000 -0-
553 Operating Contingencies -0- 53,400 i -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
554 Line Extensions 1,765 39,600 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
555 Line Replacements -0- 139,200 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
124,750 365,700 24,742 4,800 2,986 77,544 71,000 66,604 - 4,396
700 Transfer to Bond Sinking Fund 271,200 72,000 98,006 6,000 6,000 135,600 36,000 36,000 -0-
Net Fund Balance 129,437 111,000 ' 106,450 250,250 202,376 106,450 250,250 202,376 - 47,874
TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENDITURES 985,385 1,071,900 ; 267,490 300,700 250,809 554,260 617,800 577,469 , - 40,331
Inventory Balance at December 31, 1977 = $ 83,382.33
BOND SINKING FUND DECEMBER YTD
103 Cash balance at first of period 75 353
108 Invested Monies at first of period 185,983 265,307
INCOME:
400 Transfer-in from General Fund 6,000 36,000
412 Taxes: Current 73,014 84,330
413 Delinquent 246 8,516
414 Trailer House -0- -0-
415A Land Sales -0- -0-
418 Interest Earned from Invested Monies 961 5,037
419 Interest Earned from Property Taxes -0- -0-
Transfer-in from Invested Monies -0- 126,200
80,221 260,083
EXPENDITURES:
585 Bond Principal -0- 52,000
586 Bond Interest -0- 81,076
587 Bank Fees & Postage -0- 188
Transfer-to Invested Monies 74,267 121,143
74,267 254,407
TOTAL CASH AT END OF PERIOD 6,029 6,029
TOTAL INVESTED MONIES AT END OF PERIOD 260,250 260,250
TOTAL CASH & INVESTED MONIES $ 266,279 $ 266,279
(
BOND CONSTRUCTION FUND - Issue 1976 DECEMBER YTD
101 Cash balance at first of period 43 55
106 Local Government Pool at first of Month 490,569 770,797
235 Due (to)/from General Fund (97,222) (8,524)
INCOME:
410 Sale of Bonds -0- -0-
412 Interest Inocme 2,532 16,104
Transfer-in from Government Pool 40,950 395,750
43,482 411,854
EXPENDITURES:
521 Bond Costs -0- -0-
522 Professional Fees -0- -0-
523 Bond Interest -0- -0-
TOTAL MATERIALS & SERVICES -0- -0-
540 Purchase of Land -0- -0-
541 10MG Reservoir @ 125th & Bull Mt. 3,432 187,667
542 Major Transmission Lines (Extensions)49,549 173,838
543 Pipeline Replacements -0- 73,986
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 52,981 435,491
Transfer-to Government Pool 2,532 77,104
55,513 512,595
TOTAL CASH BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD 44 44
TOTAL INVESTED MONIES AT END OF PERIOD 452,151 452,151
DUE (TO)/FROM GENERAL FUND (109,254) (109,254)
$ 342,941 $ 342,941
Aftw
TIGARD WATER DISTRICT DECEMBER 31, 1977
WELL RECORDS:
*.r WELL HOURS STATIC PUMPING COSTS-ELECT.
NO. OFF LEVEL LEVEL CUBIC FEET PUMPS, ETC. HOURS
1 OFF $ 6.21 -0-
2 OFF 295.52 -0-
3 OFF 23.16 -0-
4 668.2 82,870 211.64 75.8
All 7 pump stations & Alarm-Telemetry Phones 1,484.22
82,870 $ 2,020.75
METER RECORDS:
Meters #5,298 through #5,310 = 13 meters sold.
BILLING DETAIL:
December $ 39,961.50
Delinquent 955.50
6,007,700 cubic feet of water billed.
TIGARD WATER DISTRICT December 1 , through 31 , 1977
SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS
GENERAL FUND
CHECK# PAYEE AMOUNT ACCOUNT
19375 First National Bank - #65001-3 85.50 106
19376 Tualatin Fire District 781.50 240, (430)
'too, 19377 U. S. National Bank - King City Branch 3.65 201 .,,se
19378 First National Bank - King City Branch 6.55 201
19379 Bureau of Water Works 204.00 201
19380 Winters Steel 4.00 201
19381 Homelite Textron 227.28 201
19382 City of Lake Oswego 10,047.38 201
19383 L. H. Cobb Crushed Rock 952.20 201
19384 American Brush Co. 65.23 201
19385 Valley Concrete Products 14.40 201
19386 Cantel Incorporated 81.55 201
19387 Portland Bolt & Mfg. Co. 254.58 201
19388 Knauss Chevrolet 188.27 201
19389 Forbes Automotive Machine Shop 20.00 201
19390 Willamette Industries, Inc. 297.24 201
19391 Miller Paint Co. , Inc. 42.82 201
19392 Doug's Auto Parts 54.46 201
19393 Pacific Stationery 789.59 201
19394 Meter Box Equipment Co. 9,819.79 201
19395 Power Rents, Inc. 11.25 201
19396 Watt Welding Supply 151.15 201
19397 Southwest Office Supply 29.34 201
19398 Portland Concrete Pipe Co. 2,334.78 201
19399 Sears, Roebuck & Co. 16.53 201
19400 State of Oregon - Employment Division 968.63 201
19401 Pitney Bowes 38.90 201
19402 Hinds Supply Co. 4,573.76 201 -
19403 Goodyear Truck Tire Center 287.10 201
19404 Case Power & Equipment 53.80 201
19405 U. S. Pipe & Foundry Co. 7,984.68 201
19406 Western Pacific Const. Materials Co. 492.95 (125) , 150
19407 Sanderson Safety Supply Co. 68.85 201
19408 Badger Meter, Inc. 1,413.12 201
19409 Secretarial Answering1 ervice 27.50 518
19410 Pacific Paging 29.00 518
19411 General Telephone 383.61 522, 525-1
19412 Washington County Dept. of Public Works 25.00 517
19413 Chevron 803.36 150
19414 Oliphant & Bates - Insurance 46.00 515
19415 Everett L. Wiggins 3,034.73 125
19416 Brewed Hot Coffee 26.50 516
19417 Flexible Pipe Tool Co. 20.56 201
19418 Waterworks Supplies Co. 352.69 201
19419 Petty Cash 54.46 516, 518, 527
19420 Robert E. Santee 702.67 500
19421 Nancy L. Larson 322.77 506
19422 Annie L. Schwartz 322.65 506-1
19423 John P. Miller 571.12 502
19424 Russell A. Thomas 502.47 501, 504-1
19425 William C. Bryant 436.88 504
19426 John C. Dixon 477.86 501-1, 504-1
19427 Harold H. Kuehn 290.15 503-2
°'o" 19428 Robert M. Adams 214.65 503-1
19429 Donnie R. Foster 301.07 503
19430 Randy J. Volk 472.46 502, 504-1
19431 Curtis D. Heintz 267.73 503-1
19432 Bonnie D. Hall 339.13 501-2
19433 Guy Williams 238.87 504-1, 505
19434 Eric Brewington - Final 211.46 505
TIGARD WATER DISTRICT December 1, through 31, 1977
SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS
GENERAL FUND (Cont.)
CHECK# PAYEE AMOUNT ACCOUNT
19435 Norman L. Skibby - Final 97.19 505
19436 Niel Nelsen Tire Corp. 138.00 524
'40., 19437 TWD - Bond Sinking Fund 6,000.00 700 -.row
19438 Robert E. Santee 753.73 500
19439 Nancy L. Larson 334.35 506, 522-3
19440 Annie L. Schwartz 336.90 506-1, 522-3
19441 John P. Miller 608.03 502
19442 Russell A. Thomas 474.29 501
19443 William C. Bryant 461.57 504
19444 John C. Dixon 470.96 501-1
19445 Harold H. Kuehn 180.73 503-2
19446 Robert M. Adams 294.56 503-1, 504-1
19447 Donnie R. Foster 332.96 503
19448 Randy J. Volk 435.77 502-1
19449 Curtis D. Heintz 410.51 503-1, 504-1
19450 Bonnie D. Hall 323.73 501-2
19451 Guy Williams 271.66 504-1 , 505
19452 Douglas E. Hardt 287.72 505
19453 Social Security 1,641.72 211, 509
19454 U. S. National Bank - Federal Deposit 2,965.10 212
19455 Department of Revenue 1,099.00 213
19456 State Accident Insurance Fund 2,986.81 214, 510
19457 Washington County F. C. U. 1 ,531.00 216
19458 Bankers Life Nebraska - Dental 191. 11 217, 507-1
19459 Blue Cross of Oregon 614.75 507
19460 Bankers Life Nebraska - Life 81.05 217
19461 Family Cancer Plan Ins. Co. 36.20 218
19462 P. G. E. 2,020.11 522-2, 525
Now19463 Northwest Natural Gas Co. 124.06 522-1
19464 Division of Audits 160.00 519
19465 Chevron 230.68 150
19466 Election Department 16.67 512
19467 Coast to Coast Stores 11.82 150, (408) , 524
19468 Rentex Corporation 104.70 522-3
19469 Cessco, Inc. 1,225.52 549
19470 I B M 130.00 518-2
19471 Henry Pratt Company 6,751.00 150
19472 Brewed Hot Coffee, Inc. 22.50 516
19473 Sears, Roebuck & Co. 266.65 527
19474 Tigard Muffler 13.00 524
19475 Frahler Electric Co. 14.56 150
$87,290.85
VW,
TIGARD WATER DISTRICT December 1, through 31, 1977
SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS
OTHER FUNDS
CHECK# PAYEE AMOUNT ACCOUNT
BOND SINKING FUND
*4110,
NONE
BOND CONSTRUCTION FUND
146 Richard L. Martin, Inc. 3,305.05 541
147 Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory 11.00 541
148 Northwest Natural Gas Co. 116.39 541
149 Bonstan Construction Co. 37,516.89 542
$40,949.33
GENERAL FUND - FNB
177 TWD - General Fund - USNB $ 282.00 107
Tigard Water District
12-77 Regular Meeting
December 13 , 1977
PRESENT: Hugh A. Brown, Chairman
Clarence F. Nicoli, Treasurer
Jerald R. Heater, Secretary
R. Verne Wheelwright
Robert E. Santee, Administrator
John P. Miller, Foreman
Dennis H. Quade, Attorney
VISITORS: Gilbert R. Meigs , ST&R Engineers
Ray Pirkl, Metzger Water District
Carl Jonasson, Metzger Water District
Dick Holmes, Metzger Water District
Roger Ross, Metzger Water District
John Norton, Metzger Water District
Jesse O. Lowman, Mgr. , Metzger Water District
James L. Savage, Coopers & Lybrand
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Brown
at 7: 35 p.m.
*ow Motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes
of the last meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
James Savage discussed the audit report for the Fiscal
year ended June 30, 1977. Motion was made by Jerald
Heater and seconded by Verne Wheelwright to accept the
audit report as presented. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion was made and seconded to pay the vouchers.
Motion carried unanimously.
Gilbert R. Meigs, Senior Vice President, Stevens,
Thompson & Runyan, Inc. , was requested to make an informal
presentation about the feasibility of developing the
Willamette River at Wilsonville with a smaller group of
governmental bodies; namely: Metzger, Tigard, Tualatin,
and Wilsonville. (A transcribed copy of his comments are
attached hereto) .
Verne Wheelwright stated that this meeting tonight in
which Board members of the Metzger Water District were
invited to discuss the Willamette River was in no way
intended to circumvent the efforts of the Willamette River
group with whom we have been meeting, including Beaverton
and Wolf Creek, but, at this point in time, Metzger and
4401,. Tigard have indicated a very strong interest in going ahead
with the project at an early date. The information that
Gil Meigs has presented is all the up-to-date data that
would include a project as we would see it now. If the
-1-
Re: Tigard Water District Minutes
December 13, 1977
*err
others do decide to go ahead in the full group, then
that is our basic intent to go with the full group,
but I do not believe we can wait another year for them
to decide. So, this is kind of contingency planning,
but, in no way, does it subvert the mission of the steer-
ing committee of the whole group.
Jerald Heater recommended that the districts move
ahead on both avenues, and not drop either one, because
of possible "foot-dragging" along the way by other enti-
ties and we cannot afford to wait two years for others
to tell us what they want to do.
Alternate days for the proposed common bond election
were discussed, including August 8th and September 19th,
special election dates.
John Norton suggested a time schedule be established
(working backwards) as to when specific actions should be
accomplished, such as obtaining water rights, bonding
approval from attorneys, bond counsel preparation, publi-
city, advertising, etc.
Chairman Brown suggested that the Administrator pre-
`r'" pare a time table with an August 8th special election date
(working backwards) , and have it available for discussion
by both Boards at their next regularly scheduled meetings
(in January) , and that we encourage both Boards , if they
are so minded, to adopt that time table, and to inform the
steering committee that that is the direction we are going,
and that we sure welcome "all-aboard" , but that we cannot
risk indeterminate delays. Everyone present concurred with
this suggestion and it was so ordered. However, it was
hoped that this time table would be available by the January
3rd meeting of the steering committee.
John Norton questioned whether, under the concept
described, if Metzger would be required to pay the entire
cost to extend the transmission main between Tigard and
Metzger or would this be shared by all participants. Bob
Santee advised that he envisioned this being a legitimate
cost to be shared by all the entities who would jointly
own all facilities, including the pipelines, to provide
wholesale water to each retail water purveyor. This, in
effect, would reduce the unit cost to all retail users
because of the high consumption rates of the northerly
entities. It was the opinion of the Board members of the
Metzger Water District that we were building a wholesale
water system and not a system in which each entity, indi-
vidually, connected to the system by extending a pipeline
at its expense.
-2-
Re: Tigard Water District Minutes
December 13 , 1977
Chairman Brown stated that he envisioned no problem
in this between Metzger and Tigard, but if one introduced
Wilsonville into it, he was not sure how they would feel
about contributing to the extra 50 , 000 (+) feet of pipeline
to get water to Tigard and Metzger in order to participate
in the wholesale entity. Ray Pirkl stated that he thought
the matter should be addressed at an early date because of
the vast difference in total cost for each entity partici-
pating.
Chairman Brown concluded this discussion by stating
that we would certainly agree with the points made by the
Metzger members that the details and concept should be
settled early so that there are no misunderstandings.
Also, Chairman Brown wanted to assure the Metzger members
(and he assumed that it was reciprocal) that whatever the
structure of the joint venture, it would be the desire of
this (Tigard' s) Board that it be eminently fair to the
patrons of both Metzger and Tigard Water Districts. He
continued to say that we may have some different viewpoints
on what is fair, but that you can be assured that our
"best foot" will be forward and we will attempt to make it
as sensible to Metzger as it is to us in every respect.
- Motion was made to adjourn at 9 : 44 p.m. Motion
carried unanimously.
-3-
PRESENTATION OF GILBERT R. MEIGS, STEVENS , THOMPSON
& RUNYAN, INC. ON DEVELOPMENT OF WILLAMETTE RIVER
(Transcript Summary)
December 13, 1977
Fiscal Year 1976-77 : Average Daily Demand
Tigard 2. 1 MGD
Metzger 1. 4 MGD
Tualatin 0. 6 MGD
Wilsonville 0. 4 MGD (est. 10% of above)
4. 5 MGD
Assume: On line in 1980. 1990 is the basis for initial
projections of capacity and costs.
Average Daily Demand Factor Peak Capacity
1990 9. 3 MGD 2. 5 23 . 0 MGD
Required Facilities: Estimated Cost
iftw
Treatment Plant
E
(17 MGD Nominal Capacity) $ 6. 80 Million
River Intake 0. 75 Million
Pipeline-- 36" , Wilsonville
to Tigard, 57 , 000 feet 4. 36 Million
Engineering and contingencies
15% 1. 79 Million
Inflation costs : 15% 2. 10 Million
Sub-Total: $15. 80 Million
Pipeline-- 24" , Tigard to
Metzger, 23, 000 feet $ 1. 30 Million
Pump station, S. W. 80th 0. 20 Million
Engineering + inflation (15%) 0. 20 Million
Sub-Total: $ 1. 70 Million
TOTAL: $17 . 50 Million
Note: These cost estimates were believed on the high
side. With further study it may be possible to defer
construction of the 24-inch main to Metzger until about
1985 or later.
-la-
Re: Gilbert Meigs (Continued)
Water would be pumped from Wilsonville to Tigard.
Level of Tigard' s 10-MG reservoir would be used to control
pumps at Wilsonville.
It would be a waste of energy to pump all water to
Metzger' s 500-foot level reservoir because much of Metzger
can be served from lower elevations.
System designed for this project could be expanded
if and when other entities decided to participate at a
later date. Treatment plant expansion would cost less
per million gallons of water than the initial investment
because the laboratory, parking lot, hydraulic facilities ,
chemical-feeding facilities, etc. , would already be in
existence. There would have to be an addition to the
treatment plant and a second (parallel) pipeline installed.
The 36-inch pipeline is good for about 25 MGD. 30 MGD
could be "pushed" through the pipe, but energy costs
would be substantially higher due to pipe friction which
must be overcome. Construction of a second pipeline would
not be "all that bad" because the system would then not be
solely dependent upon one pipeline. That is a plus.
Increase to a 42-inch pipe would improve flow capacity
about 30%. Incremental cost per million gallons capacity
to enlarge the pipe during initial construction would be
*Nov relatively small. -- Perhaps 10% or 15% more cost.
Recommend spending as much money as one can afford for
larger facilities because entities would enjoy more bene-
fits of the financial investment.
water
Quality of the treated Willamette River/will be every
bit as safe and good as the water the City of Lake Oswego
is taking out of the Clackamas River. Concurrence of this
belief has been expressed by representatives of the Oregon
State Health Division. However, at certain times, the
water could be warmer than the Clackamas River. Sometimes
the Willamette River gets above 70 degrees F. in the summer.
Otherwise, there should be no difference in taste or quality.
In some ways, the warmer water of the Willamette River would
be an advantage because energy to acquire hot water would be
saved.
Type of treatment would consist of the following:
(1) Chemical coagulation.
(2) Sedimentation to remove coagulated material in
the raw water, including suspended solids, such as silt,
dissolved metals, etc. , which would be precipitated in the
coagulation process.
ww (3) Filtration through rapid sand or mixed-media
filter.
(4) (Perhaps) : Addition of activated charcoal or
passage through activated carbon beds for taste and odor
control.
(5) Chlorination for disinfection of the water.
-2a-
Re: Gilbert Meigs (Continued)
This is called "conventional" water treatment;
widely used throughout the United States, well-understood,
and is the same process that is used in the mid-west and
east on such rivers as the Ohio, Missouri, Mississippi,
Hudson, etc. , and produces safe-drinking water for millions
of people. It is not unique to those parts of the U. S.
It is the same process as that being used by the Eugene
Water and Electric Board, City of Corvallis, and City of
Lake Oswego. Treatment process is well-understood, easy
to control, and one in which you can have a high degree
of confidence in that it will produce safe, domestic water
for your patrons.
No special provisions have been made for the City of
Wilsonville in either treatment plant capacity or pipeline
sizes. Wilsonville' s impact on the water supply will be
relatively minor in view of the uncertainties to deal with
and contingencies built into these estimates. The needs
of Wilsonville can be handled without difficulty.
It appears that this project, as proposed, is finan-
cially feasible, in comparison with Hillsboro' s and Forest
Grove' s recently constructed water supply facility.
Tigard Water District' s distribution system is just
not designed to serve Metzger, and sooner or later, a large
24-inch transmission main will have to be installed to
Metzger' s main reservoir (s) .
With the inflation factor as it is today, we strongly
recommend to our clients to build every much of plant as
you can possibly afford today no matter if you need it
today or 10 years from now. The inflationary effect of
construction costs is so horrible that the smart thing to
do is beg, borrow for every nickel you can and buy all you
can with it; just like buying a house. The inflation rate
is greater than the rate of borrowing.
If Metzger delayed using Willamette River water for a
few years after the plant were built, the unit cost of water
to the other entities would be higher. The main cost in
determining the unit cost of water will be in capital debt
retirement. Other costs will be labor, chemicals, electri-
city, etc. Maintenance costs should be relatively minor.
Finally, the more gallons one "pushes" through the plant,
the less the unit cost of water.
The State Engineer has stated that he intends to give
a water right to a legitimate operator who has definite
plans to take water out of the river and treat it. If one
lore
submits plans describing "what" we are going to do, "how"
we are going to do it, and "when" we intend to do it, then
I think you will get a water right.
-3a-
Re: Gilbert Meigs (Continued)
Flowing water situation on the Willamette River
is so "clobbered up" by the problems introduced by the
storage in the Army Corps of Engineers ' dams, by the fact
that the rights on the Willamette River have not been
adjudicated, by the fact that the State of Oregon really
wants to do in this area is maintain a flow to sustain
fish life, and the Army Corps of Engineers wants to sustain
flow to maintain navigation. The kind of water we are
talking about in proportion to the total flow they are
talking about is not going to make any difference to any-
body.
I frankly believe the State does not even want to have
to go through the whole exercise of determining whether you
should have a water right. I think they would gladly give
you a water right, because if they deny it, then they are
going to have to show why they denied it, and the exercise
involved in showing why they denied it is so horrible that
I do not think they want to engage in it. Furthermore,
if that does not work, and I think it will, I believe you
can make some kind of a deal with PGE about rights on the
Oregon City Falls. PGE stands to make "a ton" more money
selling you power in Wilsonville versus generating power
at the Falls. Personally, I would be shocked if the Water
Resources Board refused to issue you a permit. I would be
astonished if PGE interferred. I think this is the least
problem you have.
I would recommend that your request for water rights
be submitted prior to referral of the bond measure to the
patrons. To get a permit, after submission, is a matter of
a month or two.
The assurance that "free" flowing water could be
obtained without referral or reimbursement to the Army
Corps of Engineers was discussed. The City of Salem has
been taking water out of the South Santiam River since the
date Detroit Dam was built, possibly 20 years ago, and the
Corps of Engineers never comes around and says "hey, you
are taking our stored water" . No one can guarantee that
the water is there, because of possible prior rights. That' s
reality. But, frankly, I cannot imagine adequate water not
being there.
-4a-
t
TIGARD WATER DISTRICT 8041 S. W. COMMERCIAL ST.
TIGARD, OREGON 97223
PHONE (503) 639-1554
December 9, 1977
Jesse 0. Lowman
Manager
Metzger Water District
6501 S. W. Taylors Ferry Road Re: Development of Willamette
Portland, Oregon 97223 River at Wilsonville
Dear Jesse:
From the two meetings of the steering committee I
believe one can conclude that, neither the City of Beaverton
nor Wolf Creek Highway Water. District are prepared to make
a decision whether to participate in the subject proposal.
Representatives of Wolf Creek readily admit that even after
their proposed bond election in March they will not be
ready to make a decision for a November election for an
independent source of water. Thus, I believe it is time
to consider a different course of action with only those
participants who are truly interested and have made a com-
mitment.
With the concurrence of Commissioner Verne Wheelwright
I would like to extend an invitation to your Board of Com-
missioners (and you) to attend our next regularly scheduled
meeting on Tuesday, December 13th, at 7 :30 p.m. to discuss
other alternatives. At the meeting, Gilbert Meigs, ST&R
Engineer, will be prepared to make a presentation on required
facilities, and costs therefor, to serve a smaller area,
consisting of Wilsonville, Tualatin, Tigard, and Metzger.
He will be available to answer any questions you may have.
Both Metzger and Tigard Water Districts now have ex-
cellent storage and distribution systems. Development of
an independent source of water is the only deficiency.
Solution to that problem should take high priority.
I have gone through some arithmetic computations , shown
on enclosure (1) , to obtain rough estimates as to possible
pro-rata shares, based upon the same criteria as used in the
t '
d
llook
Re: Development of Willamette River at Wilsonville
previous proposal. If we assume a total project cost of
$15 million which I believe to be a very high estimate ,
pro-rata shares would vary as follows :
Minimum Maximum
City of Tualatin $1. 6 Million $1. 75 Million
City of Wilsonville $1. 0 Million $1. 1 Million
Metzger Water District $5. 7 Million $6. 9 Million
Tigard Water District $6. 7 Million $8 . 1 Million
Although the apparent individual costs may be higher
than the original proposal, there are definite advantages
with fewer participants. With fewer governmental entities
participating, the easier it is to arrive at a consensus
on the many issues involved.
Aolok
It would appear that considerable funds could be saved
by utilizing our own staffs for administrative details ,
some engineering work, construction inspections , using
existing mains , etc. For example:
(1) Our personnel are capable of preparing promotional
data; making application for water rights; communicating
and corresponding with other governmental bodies, such as
PGE, DEQ, Boundary Review Commission, Army Corps of Engineers,
State Engineer, etc.
(2) With legal counsel' s concurrence, utility easements
for pipeline right-of-ways can be solicited and prepared by
• our staffs.
(3) With eight years experience I am prepared to design
(gratis) the transmission main to the river. Of course, a
consulting engineer would be necessary to design the treat-
ment plant and the river intake.
(4) John Miller and you are fully qualified to provide
inspections of the pipeline installation.
oft. -2-
Y �
Il`
Re: Development of Willamette River at Wilsonville
(5) To serve Metzger, advantage can be taken of
Tigard' s existing transmission main between Bradley Corner
and the intersection of North Dakota and Greenburg Road. (16")
I have had some second thoughts about the election
date. Both the primary (May 23rd) and general (November 7th)
election dates will be saturated with political oratory
A about candidates and other issues. Our proposal could be
lost in the shuffle. The Secretary of State has approved
P other dates for elections, including money measures, as
follows:
June 27th
August Htli
September 19th
Perhaps one of these dates , in the middle of a heat wave,
may be worthy of consideration.
In any event, there appears to be many issues which
members of both Boards may want to discuss. An invitation
to attend our meeting is cordially extended.
Sincerely yours,
TIGARD WATER DISTRICT/
let%414,6
6(7/6"4")
Robert E. Santee
Administrator
-3-
omr
COMPUTATION OF PRO-RATA SHARES
METZGER AND TIGARD WATER DISTRICTS
A. Assessed Valuation of Rea] Property (FY 1976-77)
Amount Percentage
Metzger Water District $286 , 049 ,472 52 . 305%
Tigard Water District 260 , 835, 503 47 . 695%
$546, 884 , 975 100 . 000%
B. Number of Meters in Service (June 30 , 1977)
Number Percentage
a1' Metzger Water District 4 , 231 45 . 025%
Tigard Water District 5 ,166 54 . 975%
9 , 397 100. 000%
C. Water purchased and/or pumped from wells (FY 1976-77)
Cubic Feet Percentage
Metzger Water District 69 ,837 , 500 40. 807%
Tigard Water District 101,,303, 120 59 . 193%
171 , 140 , 620 100. 000%
D. Computed Pro-rata Shares (Average of above)
Percentage Dollars
Metzger Water District 46. 046% $ 6. 9 Million
Tigard Water District 53. 954% 8. 1 Million
100 . 000% $ 15. 0 Million
ENCLOSURE (1) -la-
r
COMPUTATION OF PRO-RATA SHARES
CITY OF TUALATIN, METZGER, AND TIGARD WATER DISTRICTS
A. Assessed Valuation of Real Property (FY 1976=77)
Amount Percentage
City of Tualatin $ 77 , 318 , 596 12 . 387%
Metzger Water District 286, 049 , 472 45. 826%
Tigard Water District 260 , 835, 503 41. 787%
$624 , 203, 571 100. 000%
H. Number of Mist �nr:� i n Sor vita (,lune, .i0 , 1 077)
Numhor: Per..c( nt ncty
City of Tualatin 1 , 050 10 . 050%
Metzger Water District 4 , 231 40. 500%
Tigard Water District 5 , 166 49 . 450%
10 ,447 100 . 000%
C. Water purchased and/or pumped from wells (FY 1976-77)
Cubic Feet Percentage
City of Tualatin 24 , 500, 000 12 . 523%
Metzger Water District 69 , 837 , 500 35. 697%
Tigard Water District 101 , 303 ,120 51. 780%
195 , 640 , 620 100. 000%
D. Computed Pro-rata Shares (Average of above)
Percentage Dollars
City of Tualatin 11. 654% $ 1. 75 Million
Metzger Water District 40. 674% 6. 10 Million
Tigard Water District 47. 672% 7. 15 Million
100 . 000% $ 15. 00 Million
ENCLOSURE (1) -2a-
r
OK
COMPUTATION OF PRO-RATA SHARES
CITY OF WILSONVILLE, METZGER AND TIGARD WATER DISTRICTS
A. Assessed Valuation of Real Property (FY 1976-77)
Amount Percentage
City Wilsonville $ 58 , 758, 633 9 . 702%
Metzger Water District 286 , 049 , 472 47 . 231%
Tigard Water District 260 , 835, 503 43. 067%
$605 , 643 , 608 100. 000%
R. Number of Meters in Service (June 30 , 1 977)
Number Percent dip,
City of Wilsonville 577 5. 785Yi
Metzger Water. District 4 , 231 42 . 420/;
Tigard Water District 5,166 51. 795%
9 ,974 100.000%
C. Water purchased and/or pumped from wells (FY 1976-77)
Cubic Feet Percentage
City of Wilsonville 12 , 616, 070 6. 866%
Metzger Water District 69, 837, 500 38 . 005%
Tigard Water District 101, 303, 120 55. 129%
183 ,756 , 690 100. 000%
D. Computed Pro-rata Shares (Average of above)
Percentage Dollars
City of Wilsonville 7. 451% $ 1. 1 Million
Metzger Water District 42 . 552% 6. 4 Million
Tigard Water District 49 . 997% 7. 5 Million
100. 000% $15. 0 Million
ENCLOSURE (1) -3a-
i •
i'
*saw COMPUTATION OF PRO-RATA SHARES
CITY OF TUALATIN AND CITY OF WILSONVILLE
METZGER AND TIGARD WATER DISTRICTS
A. Assessed Valuation of Real Property (FY 1976-77)
Amount Percentage
City of Tualatin 77 , 318 , 596 11. 321%
City of Wilsonville 58 ,758 , 633 8. 603%
Metzger Water District 286, 049 , 472 41. 884°
Tigard Water District 260, 835, 503 38. 192%
682 , 962 ,204 100. 000%
B. Number of Meters in Service (June 30 , 1977)
Number Percentage
City of Tualatin 1 , 050 9 . 525%
City of Wilsonville 577 5. 234%
Metzger Water District 4 , 231 38. 380%
Tigard Water District 5, 166 46 . 861%
11, 024 100 . 0000
w
C. Water purchased and/or pumped from wells (FY 1976-77)
Cubic Feet Percentage
City of Tualatin 24 , 500, 000 11. 764%
City of Wilsonville 12 , 616 , 070 6. 058°
Metzger Water District 69 , 837 ,500 33 . 534%
Tigard Water District 101 , 303 ,120 48. 644%
208 , 256 , 690 100. 000%
D. Computed Pro-rata Shares (Average of above)
Percentage Dollars
City of Tualatin 10. 870% $ 1. 6 Million
City of Wilsonville 6. 632% 1. 0 Million
Metzger Water District 37. 932% 5.7 Million
Tigard Water District 44 . 566% 6. 7 Million
100. 000% $15. 0 Million
ENCLOSURE (1) -4a-