Washington County - Natural Hazards Mitigation Action Plan /(�V. e
U.S.Department of Homeland Security
Region X
130 228th Street,SW
Bothell,WA 98021-9796
otie,��eti
:%F
T
5 oFEMA
�-�tgND SSC"J4
September 29, 2008
Honorable Tom Brian RECEIVED
Chair, Board of County Commissioners
Washington County OCT U 6 2008
155 N. First Avenue, Suite 300 City of Tigard
Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Administration
Dear Commissioner Brian:
On December 15, 2004, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) approved the Washington County Natural Hazards Mitigation
Action Plan as a local plan as outlined in 44 CFR Part 201. With approval of this plan, the
following entities are now eligible to apply for the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act's hazard mitigation project grants through December 15, 2009:
Washington County City of Tigard
The list of approved jurisdictions has been updated to include the City of Tigard, which has
recently adopted the City of Tigard Addendum to the Washington County Natural Hazards
Mitigation Action Plan. To continue eligibility the plan must be reviewed, revised as appropriate,
and resubmitted within five years of the original approval date.
If you have questions regarding your plan's approval or FEMA's mitigation grant programs,
please contact our State counterpart, Oregon Emergency Management, which coordinates and
administers these efforts for local entities.
Sincerely,
tey, Director
Mitigation Division
cc: Craig Dirksen, Mayor, City of Tigard V/
cc: Dennis Sigrist, Oregon Emergency Management
Enclosure
KM:bb
www.fema.gov
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK FEMA REGION X
Jurisdiction. City of Tigard, Oregon
LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
The plan cannot be approved if the plan has not been formally adopted. Each
SCORING SYSTEM
requirement includes separate elements.All elements of the requirement must be Please check one of the following for each requirement.
rated"Satisfactory"in order for the requirement to be fulfilled and receive a score of N-Needs Improvement: The plan does not meet the minimum for the
"Satisfactory." Elements of each requirement are listed on the following pages of the requirement. Reviewer's comments must be provided.
Plan Review Crosswalk. A"Needs Improvement"score on elements shaded in gray
(recommended but not required)will not preclude the plan from passing. Reviewer's S-Satisfactory: The plan meets the minimum for the requirement.
comments must be provided for requirements receiving a"Needs Improvement" Reviewer's comments are encouraged, but not required.
score.
Prerequisite(s)(Check Applicable Box) NOT MET MET Mitigation Strategy N S
1. Adoption by the;L.ocal'Goveming Body.§201.6(c)(5) = N/A.- 13.Local Hazard Mitigation Goals:§201 6(c)(3)(i) X
�
14 Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Actions:
OR X
§201.6(c)(3)(ii)
2. Multi-Jurisdictional Plan Adoption:§201 6(c)(5) 15. Identification and Analysis of Mitigation I X Actions: NFIP Compliance.§201.6(c)(3)(ii) X
AND
3. Mufti-Jurisdictional Planning Participation:§201.6(a)(3) I X 16. Implementation of Mitigation Actions. X§201.6(c)(3)(iii)
I 17 Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Actions: X
Planning Process N S §201.6(c)(3)(iv)
4 Documentation of the Planning Process.§201.6(b) X I Plan Maintenance Process N S
and§201 6(c)(1)
18. Monitoring,Evaluating,and Updating the Plan: I X
§201.6(c)(4)(ii)
Risk Assessment N S
19. Incorporation into Existing Planning ` X
5. Identifying Hazards.§201 6(c)(2)(i) I X Mechanisms.§201.6(c)(4)(ii)
6. Profiling Hazards:§201.6(c)(2)(i)
X 20.Continued Public Involvement:§201.6(c)(4)(iii) I X
7 Assessing Vulnerability Overview-§201.6(c)(2)(ii) X
8.Assessing Vulnerability Addressing Repetitive Loss Additional State Requirements' N S
X
Properties.§201.6(c)(2)(ii) I InsertState Requirement, NIA.
9: Assessin Vulnerabili Ideriti n Structures,
g g :" ,. NIA Insert State.Requirement ' N/A.
Infrastructure,:and Cdticel Facilities:§201.6(c)(2)01)(13)
10: Asses§ing.Vulnerability: Estimating"Potential,Losses: NCA Insert Sfate Requirement. NIA
- §201.6(c)(2j(ii)(B)
1.1: Assessing Vulnerability:Analyzing Development NIA
Trends:'§201.6(c)(2)(ii}(C) LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN APPROVAL STATUS
12. Multi-Jurisdictional Risk Assessment:§201.6(c)(2)(iii) X
PLAN NOT APPROVED I I
"States that have additional requirements can add them in the appropriate sections of See Reviewer's Comments I I
the Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance or create a new section and
modify this Plan Review Crosswalk to record the score for those requirements. PLAN APPROVED I X
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 A - 1
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK FEMA REGION X
Jurisdiction- City of Tigard, Oregon
Local Mitigation Plan Review and Approval Status
Jurisdiction: Title of Plan: Date of Plan:
City of Tiqard I Addendum to Washinqton Co Plan I May 2008
Local Point of Contact: Address:
Mike Lueck
Title:
Agency:
Phone Number: E-Mail:
Mikel(atigard-or.gov
State Reviewer: I Title: I Date:
I
FEMA Reviewer: Title: Date:
Jerry Probst Mitigation Specialist June 16, 2008
Kristen Meyers Mitigation Planninq Manager July 9, 2008
Date Received in FEMA Region X May 30, 2008
Plan Not Approved
Plan Approved X
Date Approved September 29, 2008
NFIP Status*
CRS
Jurisdiction: Y N N/A Class
1. Tigard X
* Notes: Y = Participating N = Not Participating N/A= Not Mapped
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 A - 2
, I
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK FEMA REGION X
Jurisdiction: City of Tigard, Oregon
PREREQUISITES)
1. Adoption by the Local Governing Body
Requirement§201.6(c)(5): [The local hazard mitigation plan shall include]documentation that the plan has been formally adopted by the governing body of the
jurisdiction requesting approval of the plan(e.g., City Council, County Commissioner, Tribal Council)
Location in the SCORE
Plan (section or NOT
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments MET MET
k' Has th' 'locaI governing,'body adopted.new or updated t N/A_
plan?
B.. Is supporting documentation, such,as a.resolution, N/A
included? r
SUMMARY SCORE °i N/A
2. Multi-Jurisdictional Plan Adoption
Requirement§201.6(c)(5): For multi jurisdictional plans, each jurisdiction requesting approval of the plan must document that it has been formally adopted._
Location in the SCORE
Plan (section or NOT
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments MET MET
A. Does the new or updated plan indicate the specific Page 10, Multi- Tigard is one of other jurisdictions and taxing districts that have
jurisdictions represented in the plan? Jurisdictional opted to take a regional planning approach and partner with X
Planning Effort Washington County in implementing codes and ordinances to
reduce impact of natural disasters to the overall community.
B For each jurisdiction, has the local governing body Page 11, Formal The Tigard City Council adopted the plan via consent agenda. X
adopted the new or updated plan? Review Process
C. Is supporting documentation, such as a resolution, Consent agenda adopting plan provided. X
included for each participating jurisdiction?
SUMMARY SCORE X
J U i_. Y 1 , 2008 A - 3
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK FEMA REGION X
Jurisdiction: City of Tigard, Oregon
3. Multi-Jurisdictional Planning Participation
Requirement§201.6(a)(3): Multi jurisdictional plans(e.g., watershed plans)may be accepted, as appropriate, as long as each jurisdiction has participated in
the process Statewide plans will not be accepted as multi jurisdictional plans.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or NOT
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments MET MET
A. Does the new or updated plan describe how each Section 1: Tigard planning participation is documented.
jurisdiction participated in the plan's development? Planning X
Process
:B: Do' s:.the updated plan'identify all participating' N/A-£New Plan: r
jurisdictions,including neW,,continuing,and the
jurisdictions:that no longer participate_in:the plant'
SUMMARY SCORE X
PLANNING PROCESS: §201.6(b) An open public involvement process is essential to the development of an effective plan.
4. Documentation of the Planning Process
Requirement§201.6(b): In order to develop a more comprehensive approach to reducing the effects of natural disasters, the planning process shall include
(1) An opportunity for the public to comment on the plan during the drafting stage and prior to plan approval;
(2) An opportunity for neighboring communities, local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation activities, and agencies that have the authority to
regulate development, as well as businesses, academia and other private and non-profit interests to be involved in the planning process, and
(3) Review and incorporation, if appropriate, of existing plans, studies, reports, and technical information.
Requirement§201.6(c)(1): [The plan shall document]the planning process used to develop the plan, including how it was prepared, who was involved in the
process, and how the public was involved.
Location in the SCORE
Plan (section or N S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the plan provide a narrative description of the Page 9, Section The Tigard Hazard Mitigation Working Group (HMWP)was formed
process followed to prepare the new or updated plan? 1: Planning composed of public agencies, non-profit organizations, city X
Process residents, and regional and statewide organizations.
B. Does the new or updated plan indicate who was Page 9, Section The City Manager assigned selected city staff to assist the HMWP.
involved in the current planning process? (For 1: Planning The Hazard Mitigation Working Group(HMWG)is composed of a
example,who led the development at the staff level and Process variety of agencies. X
were there any external contributors such as
contractors?Who participated on the plan committee,
provided information, reviewed drafts, etc.?)
J U L Y 1 2 0 0 8 A - 4
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK FEMA REGION X
Jurisdiction. City of Tigard, Oregon
C. Does the new or updated plan indicate how the public Page 10, Public Several public workshops were created in order to add the Natural
was involved? (Was the public provided an opportunity Involvement Hazard element to the existing Tigard Comprehensive Land Use X
to comment on the plan during the drafting stage and Plan.
prior to the plan approval?)
D. Does the new or updated plan discuss the Page 9, External A list of city and external agencies and organizations that provided
opportunity for neighboring communities, agencies, Agencies a collaborative effort in development of the HMP is provided. For
businesses, academia, nonprofits, and other interested example, other incorporated cities and towns who reviewed the X
parties to be involved in the planning process? Tigard HMP, community college, public utilities, ODOT, school
districts,etc.
E. Does the planning process describe the review and Page 10, The HMP is integrated with the Tigard's adopted Comprehensive
incorporation, if appropriate, of existing plans, studies, Implementation Land Use Plan, and existing development rules and codes. X
reports, and technical information? through existing
programs
F:`I :Does the updated plan document how the planning N/A-"New Plan
team•reviewed'and:analyzed each.:section of the plan = ' N/A
and--whetheveach section;was,revised as part of"the w
;update'peocess?,
SUMMARY SCORE X
RISK ASSESSMENT: §201 6(c)(2). The plan shall include a risk assessment that provides the factual basis for activities proposed in the strategy to reduce losses
from identified hazards Local risk assessments must provide sufficient information to enable the jurisdiction to idents and prioritize appropriate mitigation
actions to reduce losses from identified hazards
S. Identifying Hazards
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(i): [The risk assessment shall include a]description of the type . of all natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction.
Location in the SCORE
Plan (section or N I S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the new or updated plan include a description of Page 17, Section Five major hazards were identified—floods,landslides,wildfires,
the types of all natural hazards that affect the 3, Hazard earthquakes, and severe storms:wind and winter. X
jurisdiction? Assessment
SUMMARY SCORE X
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 A " 5
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK FEMA REGION X
Jurisdiction City of Tigard, Oregon
6. Profiling Hazards
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(i): [The risk assessment shall include a]description of the . location and extent of all natural hazards that can affect the
jurisdiction The plan shall include information on previous occurrences of hazard events and on the probability of future hazard events.
Location in the SCORE
Plan (section or N I S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the risk assessment identify the location (i.e., Sections 5-9 Each hazard section has a concise narrative of the characteristics
geographic area affected)of each natural hazard of each natural disaster, including location. Maps of each hazard X
addressed in the new or updated plan? are also provided.
B. Does the risk assessment identify the extent(i.e., Sections 5-9 Each Section addressing natural hazards includes a narrative
magnitude or severity)of each hazard addressed in the discussion of the"characteristics'of each natural hazard, including X
new or updated plan? extent.
C. Does the plan provide information on previous Sections 5-9 Each Section includes a narrative of historic natural hazard events.
occurrences of each hazard addressed in the new or X
updated plan?
D. Does the plan include the probability of future events Sections 5-9 Of the five identified disasters,the probability ranking show
(i.e., chance of occurrence)for each hazard addressed in weather storm events the highest at 5 and landslide the lowest at
the new or updated plan? 1. Also, note in each section the colored highlighted summary"by X
the numbers"showing a numeric synopsis of events, probability,
critical facilities, acres, hazard score, and value of structures.
SUMMARY SCORE X
7. Assessing Vulnerability: Overview
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii): [The risk assessment shall include a]description of the jurisdiction's vulnerability to the hazards described in paragraph (c)(2)(i)
of this section. This description shall include an overall summary of each hazard and its impact on the community
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the new or updated plan include an overall Sections 5-9 The city's vulnerability to each hazard is described in each hazard
summary description of the jurisdiction's vulnerability to section. X
each hazard?
B. Does the new or updated plan address the impact of Sections 5-9 The impacts of each hazard are addressed in each hazard section. X
each hazard on the jurisdiction?
SUMMARY SCORE X
J U L Y 1 2 0 0 8 A - 6
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK FEMA REGION X
Jurisdiction City of Tigard, Oregon
8. Assessing Vulnerability: Addressing Repetitive Loss Properties
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii): [The risk assessment]must also address National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) insured structures that have been
repetitively damaged floods.
Location in the SCORE
Plan (section or
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments N S
A. Does the new or updated plan describe vulnerability Page 27, There is only one repetitive loss property in Tigard due to a flood
in terms of the types and numbers of repetitive loss Repetitive Flood event. X
properties located in the identified hazard areas? Loss
SUMMARY SCORE X
9. Assessing Vulnerability: Identifying Structures
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A): The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of the types and numbers of existing and future buildings, infrastructure, and
critical facilities located in the identified hazard area . . .
Location in the SCORE
Plan (section or
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments N S
-A.-Does".thejnew:,or updated plan describe vulnerability,'in' Section 54 Plan describes vulnerability in terms of.the critical facilities, '
terms of the.1ipes and.nurnbe"rs-of e.A. ".g,buildinds, essential facilities,,infrastructure,tax lots—andacreage exposed: X
infr'astructu're„and criticaftacil'ities located in”#fie
ide'flfied:hazard areas?. - . . .
B. Does„the 16ew or updated`plan describe,vulnerability in NIA
terrns,of-the typesand numbers of future buildings, N/A
infrastructure,:and critical facilitiesiocated in the
identified,.haiard areas?
SUMMARY SCORE ,,N/A
10. Assessing Vulnerability: Estimating Potential Losses
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B): [The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of an]estimate of the potential dollar losses to vulnerable structures
identified in paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(A) of this section and a description of the methodology used to prepare the estimate .
Location in the �. SCORE
Plan (section or I N S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Dees.:the new or updated plan estimate potential dollar Section 5=9; The:�alue of`exposed tax lots`with structures is,provided:�- ' WAlossesao vulnerable structures? ”
B Does the new or.updated;plan describe,the methodelogy. Section 5-9 -Only tax lots with a structure,are,included'in exposure value.` N/A
used"to prepare the estimate?, ".hv,
SUMMARY SCORE N/A'
J U L Y 1 2 0 0 8 A - 7
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK FEMA REGION X
Jurisdiction: City of Tigard, Oregon
11. Assessing Vulnerability: Analyzing Development Trends
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(ii)(C): (The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of]providing a general description of land uses and development trends
within the community so that mitigation options can be considered in future land use decisions.
Location in the SCORE
Plan (section or N S
Element annex_and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. ;Does the new or.updated plan describe land uses and N/A;,. MIA
devdfbprnent,trends?
SUMMARY SCORE i I .N/A
12. Multi-Jurisdictional Risk Assessment
Requirement§201.6(c)(2)(iii): For multi jurisdictional plans, the risk assessment must assess each jurisdiction's risks where they vary from the risks facing the
entire planning area.
Location in theI SCORE
Plan (section or `I N S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the new or updated plan include a risk Sections 3, 5-9 Detailed risk assessment of Tigard is provided in addendum.
assessment for each participating jurisdiction as X
needed to reflect unique or varied risks?
SUMMARY SCORE X
MITIGATION STRATEGY: §2016(c)(3) The plan shall include a mitigation strategy that provides the jurisdiction's blueprint for reducing the potential losses
ident f ed in the risk assessment, based on existing authorities,policies,programs and resources, and its ability to expand on and improve these existing tools
13. Local Hazard Mitigation Goals
Requirement§201.6(c)(3)(i): [The hazard mitigation strategy shall include a]description of mitigation goals to reduce or avoid long-term vulnerabilities to the
identified hazards.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A Does the new or updated plan include a description Page 21,Section The city's HMP goals support Washington County's multi-
of mitigation goals to reduce or avoid long-term 4: Multi-Hazard jurisdictional plan in addition to its own adopted Comprehensive X
vulnerabilities to the identified hazards? Goals and Action Land Use Plan.
Items
SUMMARY SCORE X
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 A - 8
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK FEMA REGION X
Jurisdiction- City of Tigard, Oregon
14. Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Actions
Requirement§201.6(c)(3)(ii): (The mitigation strategy shall include a]section that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions
and projects being considered to reduce the effects of each hazard, with particular emphasis on new and existing buildings and infrastructure
Location in the SCORE
Plan (section or N S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the new or updated plan identify and analyze a Sections 4-9 Multi-hazard and hazard-specific actions are identified.
comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions X
and projects for each hazard?
B Do the identified actions and projects address Sections 4-9 Plan identifies a variety of actions that address mitigation for
reducing the effects of hazards on new buildings and new buildings and infrastructure. X
infrastructure?
C. Do the identified actions and projects address Sections 4-9 Plan identifies a variety of actions that address mitigation for
reducing the effects of hazards on existing buildings existing buildings and infrastructure. X
and infrastructure?
SUMMARY SCORE X
15.Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Actions: National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)Compliance
Requirement:§201.6(c)(3)(ii): [The mitigation strategy]must also address the jurisdiction's participation in the National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP), and
continued compliance with NFIP requirements, as appropriate
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the new or updated plan describe the jurisdiction (s) Page 31, ST-FL#1 NFIP participation and strategy for continued compliance are X
participation in the NFIP? described
B. Does the mitigation strategy identify, analyze and prioritize Page 31, ST-FL#1 See above. X
actions related to continued compliance with the NFIP?
SUMMARY SCORE X
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 A - 9
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK FEMA REGION X
Jurisdiction City of Tigard, Oregon
16. Implementation of Mitigation Actions
Requirement:§201.6(c)(3)(iii): [The mitigation strategy section shall include]an action plan describing how the actions identified in section (c)(3)(ii) will be
prioritized, implemented, and administered by the local jurisdiction Prioritization shall include a special emphasis on the extent to which benefits are maximized
according to a cost benefit review of the proposed projects and their associated costs.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N I S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the new or updated mitigation strategy include how Section 10* Describes three steps in the prioritization process using a
the actions are prioritized? (For example, is there a Mitigation Planning FEMA accepted hazard analysis. X
discussion of the process and criteria used?) Priority System
B Does the new or updated mitigation strategy address how Pages 53 to 58. Matrix shows timeline, responsible organization, partners, and
the actions will be implemented and administered, Appendix A: plan goals addressed
including the responsible department , existing and Action Item Matrix X
potential resources and the timeframe to complete each
action?
C. Does the new or updated prioritization process include an Page 12, Economic The Citizen's Work Group will use a FEMA approved
emphasis on the use of a cost-benefit review to maximize Analysis of benefit/cost analysis. X
benefits? Mitigation Projects
D, Does.Ihe updated plan identify the.completed,deletedor, N/A
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK FEMA REGION X
Jurisdiction. City of Tigard, Oregon
PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCESS
18. Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan
Requirement§201.6(c)(4)(i):[The plan maintenance process shall include a]section describing the method and schedule of monitoring, evaluating, and
updating the mitigation plan within a five-year cycle.
Location in the SCORE
Plan (section or N S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the new or updated plan describe the method and Page 11, Formal Plan will be monitored and evaluated on a biannual basis
schedule for monitoring the plan, including the responsible Review Process and annual meeting of the HMWG X
department?
B. Does the new or updated plan describe the method and Page 11, Formal See above.
schedule for evaluating the plan, including how,when and by Review Process X
whom (i.e.the responsible department)?
C. Does the new or updated plan describe the method and Page 11, Formal Every five years the convener will submit an updated plan
schedule for updating the plan within the five-year cycle? Review Process through Washington County to the State Hazard Mitigation X
Officer and FEMA for review.
SUMMARY SCORE X
19. Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms
Requirement§201.6(c)(4)(ii): [The plan shall include a]process by which local governments incorporate the requirements of the mitigation plan into other
planning mechanisms such as comprehensive or capital improvement plans, when appropriate
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or N S
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments
A. Does the new or updated plan identify other local planning Sections 5 through 9. Each section has a description of current mitigation
mechanisms available for incorporating the mitigation activities and identifies existing mechanisms to update in X
requirements of the mitigation plan? future mitigation actions
B. Does the new or updated plan include a process by which the Section 5-9 Method for incorporation ins identified in specific action
local government will incorporate the mitigation strategy and items. X
other information contained in the plan (e.g., risk assessment)
into other planning mechanisms,when appropriate?
C Does the iipdated`plan;explain.hgw tFie:locaI government, NIA=New Plan
incorporated'the mitigation strategy and otherinform6tion' u, N/A
contained iri the plan(e.g:,,risk assessment)into other
„planning.mechanisms,when appropriate?
SUMMARY SCORE X
J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 A - 11
LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK FEMA REGION X
Jurisdiction City of Tigard, Oregon
Continued Public Involvement
Requirement§201.6(c)(4)(iii): [The plan maintenance process shall include a]discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan
maintenance process.
Location in the SCORE
Plan(section or
Element annex and page#) Reviewer's Comments N S
A. Does the new or updated plan explain how continued public Page 11, Continued A public meeting will be held after each annual
participation will be obtained? (For example,will there be Public Involvement evaluation, and use of the Tualatin Valley Community X
public notices, an on-going mitigation plan committee, or Television, city's web page, and local newspaper.
annual review meetings with stakeholders?)
SUMMARY SCORE X
END OF REVIEW
J IDLY 1 2008 A - 12