CUP2014-00004 CUP2O14 - 00004
Japanese
International
Baptist Church
BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
Regarding an application by the Japanese International ) F I N A L O R D E R
Baptist Church for approval of a Conditional Use Permit ) CUP 2014-00003
to construct an accessory building on a 3.06-acre parcel ) (Japanese International
at 8500 SW Spruce Street, in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) Baptist Church)
A. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The applicant, Japanese International Baptist Church, requests approval of a
Conditional Use Permit to construct a 7,000 square foot accessory building on a 3.06-acre
parcel located at 8500 SW Spruce Street; also known as Washington County tax map
1S136CB, Lot 04400 (the "site"). The site contains the existing Japanese International
Baptist Church and associated parking lot on the eastern portion and and two single-
family residences and accessory structures on the western portion. The applicant will
remove the residences and accessory structures to accommodate the proposed
development. The proposed accessory building will house a classrooms and a half-court
gymnasium that will serve the existing church. The northwest corner of the site is zoned
R-25 (medium high-density residential district, 25 units per acre). The remainder of the
site and abutting properties to the east, west and south are zoned R-12 (medium-density
residential district, 12 units per acre). The property abutting the southeast corner of the
site is zoned PR (Parks and Recreation). Properties to the north are in unincorporated
Washington County. Additional basic facts about the site and surrounding land and
applicable approval standards are provided in the Staff Report to the Hearings Officer
dated December 15, 2014 (the "Staff Report"), incorporated herein by reference.
2. Tigard Hearings Officer Joe Turner (the "hearings officer") held a duly noticed
public hearing on December 22, 2014 to receive and consider public testimony in this
matter. All exhibits and records of testimony are filed with the Tigard Department of
Community Development. At the beginning of the hearing, the hearings officer made the
declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte
contacts, bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary by the hearings officer
of selected relevant testimony offered at the hearing.
3. Tigard Hearings Officer Joe Turner(the "hearings officer") conducted a duly
noticed public hearing to receive testimony and evidence in this matter. At the public
hearing, City staff recommended approval of the application, subject to conditions of
approval in the Staff Report. Representatives of the applicant testified in support of the
application. Two persons testified orally and one person testified in writing with
questions about the application. One person testified in writing in support of the
application. Disputed issues in this case include:
a. Whether the proposed development will cause or exacerbate flooding on
adjacent properties;
b. Whether the proposed development will cause excessive noise impacts;
c. Whether lighting on the site will cast glare on adjacent properties;
d. Whether the proposed development will cause excessive parking
impacts on the surrounding neighborhood;
e. Whether the proposed development will encourage graffiti; and
f. Whether the applicant can and will maintain vegetation the site in
compliance with City Codes.
4. Based on the findings and discussion provided or incorporated in this final
order, the hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that
the proposed development does or will comply with the applicable criteria of the
Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision
complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval
warranted to ensure such compliance occurs in fact. Therefore the application should be
approved subject to such conditions.
B. HEARING AND RECORD
1. The hearings officer received testimony at the public hearing about this
application on December 22, 2014. All exhibits and records of testimony are filed with
the Tigard Department of Community Development. At the beginning of the hearing, the
hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer
disclaimed any ex parte contacts, bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary
by the hearings officer of selected testimony offered at the public hearing in this matter.
2. City planner Gary Pagenstacher summarized the Staff Report and the proposed
development.
a. He noted that the proposed building is subject to the setback
requirements for conditional uses, which require 25-foot front and 20-foot side yard
setbacks. The applicable zoning districts require 15-foot to 20-foot front and 10-foot to
15-foot side yard setbacks, depending on whether single- or multi-family dwellings are
proposed.
b. The Code does not require buffers along the boundaries of the site.
However the applicant proposed to provide a landscaped buffer between the proposed
building and the adjacent single-family residence west of the site.
CUP 2014-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Japanese International Baptist Church) Page 2
c. The proposed development will have no impact on the Significant
Natural Resource area south of the site.
3. Tony Weller and Kenji Yokoi testified for the applicant.
a. Mr. Weller testified that the applicant will remove the existing single-
family residences and garage on the site to accommodate the proposed accessory
building. The applicant will replace the existing driveway serving the residence with curb
and sidewalk and construct new half-width street improvements along the site's frontage
on SW Spruce Street. The applicant will construct an ADA ramp to facilitate access
between the proposed accessory building and the existing church. The applicant will plant
additional trees within the existing church parking lot as required by the City's urban
forestry standards. No other changes are proposed to the existing parking lot and
driveway. The applicant will collect stormwater runoff from all new impervious surfaces
on the site and convey it to an on-site stormwater pond for treatment and detention. The
applicant will discharge treated stormwater into the vegetated corridor on the south end of
the site at less than predevelopment rates.
i. The site slopes downhill to the south. Therefore stormwater
runoff from the site flows onto adjacent properties under existing conditions. The
proposed development will intercept some of that runoff and divert it to the stormwater
pond and then into the vegetated corridor, potentially reducing the amount of stormwater
flowing onto adjacent properties.
ii. The applicant will design, install and shield outdoor lights on
the site to limit offsite glare. The majority of outdoor lighting will be on the north and
east faces of the building. No new parking lot lights are proposed. One light is proposed
above the door to the gymnasium on the west wall of the building.
iii. The proposed building is located and designed to limit offsite
impacts. Windows in the gymnasium portion are located near the roof and the building is
fully enclosed. The applicant will plant a variety of trees, shrubs and groundcovers
between the west wall of the proposed building and the boundary of the site to screen and
buffer the structure from adjacent residential properties. The stormwater pond will also be
heavily landscaped. The proposed building will be setback 20 feet from the western
boundary of the site.
b. Mr. Yokoi testified that the church wants to have a positive impact on
the community. The proposed building will be setback from adjacent properties and the
setback areas will be landscaped to buffer adjacent properties. The accessory building
will primarily be used during the daytime. He agreed to a condition of approval
prohibiting use of the gymnasium between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in order to limit
potential noise impacts. The church will work with neighbors to mitigate any unforeseen
CUP 2014-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Japanese International Baptist Church) Page 3
impacts that may occur. The church plans to replace the existing fence between the site
and the Mimnaughs' property.
4. Eric Nichols testified that water appears to accumulate in the crawlspace below
his house under existing conditions. He expressed concerns that the proposed stormwater
pond will exacerbate this problem.
5. Jeff Mimnaugh questioned who will be responsible if the proposed stormwater
facility fails and causes flooding on adjacent properties. He expressed concerns with
potential lighting and noise impacts on adjacent properties.
6. The hearings officer closed the record at the end of the hearing and announced
his intention to approve the application subject to conditions.
C. DISCUSSION
1. City staff recommended that the hearings officer approve the application, based
on the affirmative findings and subject to conditions of approval in the Staff Report. The
applicant accepted those findings and conditions without exceptions. The hearings officer
adopts the findings and conclusions in the Staff Report as his own except to the extent
they are inconsistent with the findings and discussion in this final order.
2. Concerns were expressed with existing runoff and stormwater ponding
problems in the area. The applicant is not required to remedy all existing and perceived
problems. The Code only prohibits the applicant from making things worse. However the
hearings officer finds that the proposed development will not increase the overall volume
of runoff flowing onto adjacent properties. To the contrary, the proposed development is
likely to reduce the overall volume of stormwater runoff flowing onto adjacent properties.
As Mr. Weller testified, stormwater falling on this site flows downhill to the south, onto
the adjoining properties, under existing conditions. The proposed development will
intercept some of that existing runoff and convey it to a stormwater facility south of the
proposed building for treatment and detention. The applicant will discharge the treated
stormwater to the wetlands on the south end of the site. The proposed stormwater
facilities will capture some portion of the runoff that would otherwise flow onto adjacent
properties and divert it to the stormwater facility, reducing the total area of the site that
drains towards adjacent properties. The stormwater facility is unlikely to fail. A
professional engineer will design the facility considering the expected volume of runoff
from the site, the soil types on the site, and other factors. City engineering staff will
review the design to ensure it complies with accepted requirements for such facilities.
3. The hearings officer finds that the proposed development will not cause
excessive noise impacts on adjacent properties. The majority of activities on the site will
occur within the fully enclosed building. The building will be setback 25 feet or more
from abutting properties. The applicant will provide dense landscaping between the
CUP 2014-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Japanese International Baptist Church) Page 4
building and abutting residential properties to the west. In addition, activities on the site
are subject to the noise limits of section 6.02.430.A Tigard Municipal Code (the "TMC"),
which provides the following limitations on noise:
a. Noise, measured at the boundary of residential properties, in excess of
40 dB at any time between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. the following day;
b. Noise, measured at the boundary of residential properties, in excess of
50 dB at any time between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. the following day;
c. Noise that is plainly audible at any time between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. the
following day within a noise-sensitive unit which is not the source of sound; and
d. Noise that is unnecessarily loud within a noise- sensitive unit which is
not the source of the sound.
Activities on the site are subject to these noise limitations. The applicant agreed to
prohibit use of the gymnasium between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. the following day. A condition
of approval is warranted to that effect.
4. The hearings officer finds that lighting on the site will not impact adjacent
properties. Section 18.725.030.E of the Tigard Development Code (the "TDC") prohibits
on-site lighting from casting direct or reflected glare on adjacent properties. The applicant
states that recessed down lights are proposed for the outdoor security lighting. The west
exit will have a single wall mount fixture above the door with appropriate shielding to
prevent glare or light intrusion on neighboring properties.
5. The proposed development will have no impact on parking. The proposed
accessory building is intended to support the existing church. It will not increase the
capacity of the church or generate additional traffic and parking demand. Parking impacts
generated by the existing church are not relevant to this application. Parking is permitted
on public streets in the area on a first-come, first served basis. On-street parking is not
reserved for abutting residents and their guests.
6. There is no evidence that the proposed building will increase the amount of
graffiti in the area. Any new walls will provide an additional "canvas" for graffiti.
However there is no evidence that the proposed building will attract a disproportionate
amount of graffiti. The applicant will install low-level security lighting to facilitate visual
surveillance of the building and the applicant, like all other property owners in the City, is
required to promptly remove any graffiti that may occur. TMC 6.02.060.
7. Concerns were expressed about problems with noxious vegetation growing on
the site under existing conditions. TMC 6.02.020.A requires the applicant remove any
CUP 2014-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Japanese International Baptist Church) Page 5
noxious vegetation growing on the property or in the right-of-way abutting the property.'
It is in the applicant's interest to maintain vegetation on the site in compliance with these
regulations. Neighboring residents should inform the applicant if vegetation on the site is
not being maintained. Neighbors can also contact the City to request enforcement of these
standards. Enforcement is generally a complaint driven process. The City relies on citizen
complaints to identify violations. However, once a violation has been identified,the City
will enforce the laws. Neighbors can initiate the enforcement process by reporting any
violations they observe.
D. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the findings and discussion provided or incorporated in this final order, the
hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the
proposed conditional use permit, sensitive lands permit, and adjustment, do or will
comply with the applicable criteria of the Community Development Code,provided
development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and
federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs
in fact.
E. DECISION
In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the
Staff Report and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings
officer hereby approves CUP 2014-00003 (Japanese International Baptist Church),
subject to the following conditions of approval:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY SITE WORK
The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting
documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Gary Pagenstecher,
503-718-2434. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the
required information is found:
' TMC 6.01.020.L defines"Noxious vegetation"as:
1. Weeds more than 10 inches high;
2. Grass more than 10 inches high,with the exception of agricultural crops;
3. Poison oak,poison ivy or similar vegetation;fire;4Vegetation that is likely to cause 5.Blackberry
bushes that extend into a right-of-way or across a property line;
6. Vegetation that is a health hazard;
7. Vegetation that is a health hazard because it impairs the view of the right-of-way or otherwise
makes use of the right-of-way hazardous;
CUP 2014-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Japanese International Baptist Church) Page 6
1. Prior to site work, the project arborist shall perform a site inspection for tree
protection measures, document compliance/non-compliance with the urban
forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to
the city manager or designee within one week of the site inspection.
2. The project arborist shall perform twice monthly site inspections for tree
protection measures during periods of active site development and construction,
document compliance/non-compliance with the urban forestry plan and send
written verification with a signature of approval directly to the project planner
within one week of the site inspection.
3. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit to the City of Tigard the current
Inventory Data Collection fee for urban forestry plan implementation. The
inventory fee is $958.00 ($147. first tree; $28 x 22 additional planted (16) and
existing (7) trees; $195 for 1 stand of trees).
4. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide a tree establishment bond that meets
the requirements of the Urban Forestry Manual Section 11, Part 2. The bond
amount is $7,056.
(16 planted trees x $441/tree)
5. The applicant shall provide a franchise hauler service provider letter confirming
the existing facility has adequate capacity.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tigard-
or.gov) for review and approval:
6. Prior to any work on site, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required
for this project to cover street improvements, public utility issues, and any other
work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans
shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. The PFI permit
plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of
the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and
who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. Failure to
provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing
of project documents.
7. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City
Engineer for the street design which is anticipated to include a 16-foot paved half
width plus an 5-foot planter, 5-foot sidewalk street trees, lights and any required
signs.
8. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City
Engineer of a design access report.
9. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City
Engineer and other appropriate agencies for the final design of the storm drainage
system to serve the site and any downstream impacts. Revise plans to show
Spruce Street draining to existing drainage along the north side of the street.
Submit the area of untreated runoff
CUP 2014-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Japanese International Baptist Church) Page 7
10. Prior to any work on site the applicant shall obtain city and CWS approval of the
complete design of the stormwater detention facilities and maintenance plans for
them, including maintenance requirements and provisions for any treatments used.
11. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall provide documented approval from
the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) of the design of the proposed water
and fire service.
12. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin
Valley Fire &Rescue (TVF&R) for the planned access and hydrant location.
13. Prior to any ground disturbance on the site, the applicant shall obtain an erosion
control permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the
Federal Clean Water Act. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and
Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition (and any
subsequent versions or updates)."
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tigard-
or.gov) for review and approval:
14. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain all permits and
service provider letters necessary from all appropriate agencies (such as Washington
County, Tualatin Valley Water Department and Clean Water Services) for all work
to be done on site.
15. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain approval from
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue.
16. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall demonstrate that the
reconstructed sewer lateral, including portions that are not replaced, meet
standards.
17. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain city approval of
plans for the construction of the stormwater treatment facilities and a Storm Water
Connection Authorization.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION:
The applicant shall contact the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ATTN: Gary Pagenstecher 503-718-2434.
18. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall call for a final planning
inspection to ensure the project was completed as shown on the approved plan.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tigard-
or.gov)for review and approval:
CUP 2014-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Japanese International Baptist Church) Page 8
19. Prior to final inspection, all elements of the proposed infrastructure (such as
transportation, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, water, etc.) shall be in place and
operational with accepted maintenance plans. The developer's engineer shall
provide written certification that all improvements, workmanship and materials
are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices,
and are of high grade, prior to city acceptance of the development's improvements
or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance.
20. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall obtain an approved Washington
County Facility Permit for the complete construction of required street
improvements.
21. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall obtain city and CWS approval of the
complete construction of the stormwater treatment facilities and maintenance
plans. (Contact Brian Wheatley at 503-718-2610).
22. Prior to final inspection,the applicant shall provide a final sight distance report.
23. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley
Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) for access and hydrant location and any other necessary
construction.
24. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall submit payment of$5,950 for the fee
in-lieu of relocating utilities underground.
OPERATION OF THE FACILITY SHALL
COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
25. The gymnasium shall not be used between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. the following day.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION.
t
DATED this 7 ay of January 2014.
Joe Turner, Esq., AICP
City of Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer
CUP 2014-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Japanese International Baptist Church) Page 9
I a w -a n ;r ivOAK WAY Q Oa r r & II. I to VICINITY MAP
F- •
r. --} I at I j 1 alai Via 4 Ma !'d CUP2014-00003
In 0 0p OAK S T Z Japanese International
I MI el M. N IMMI r� Baptist Church Expansion
vt a 1 a i
I y I a if a
Ira i
PINE ST
co
..a 1 ! a
t Po o al1a ' � z +fi Ittlit
r
NUM ra a. ■ ij jj i al Subject Site
SPRUCE ST �.,
u; ..ramie SPRUCE ST
Q a d i
■■■■■n
ill" ■r■- ■1 _I
dry ■■■ �■r t," isa r
JOELLE -"mg I ; f amityx
a, d Irr ar rt ■ m
III LUCILLE C e ut -_ I 2
r L or ■■
a ■■■■L / II III WI T I i
Ulan ■ ■■■■■■ J THORN
■■■■■■■■■ sr iiiiiiiii 1y' ,,,,,,I / *I�'� ' '
a ss�______ yy. S TE V E�.ST
tik
m _ - J.+ s r it r j Information on this map is for general location
only and should be verified with the
...- W Development Services Division.
w� Approx,Scale 1:4,000-1 In=333 tl
Q r Q a Map panted at 07t 13 AM on 26-Nov-14
ii�+�� Y I --d `y > irr- DATA NOARIVEDTY.ItgaPENATIONOGUAAINTEF STOT
Au r, 1 I MDATA NO VGIVED FR REPRESENTATION DRGHE CLIVEE AS TO THE
yIy CONTENT,ACCURACY TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF
ill f i r.r -wl Q 0 ty9 THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN.THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO
J i ��wi i�11. LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS.OR INACCURACIES IN THE
I I Q Mry�. INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF NOW CAUSED.
lIl ad u I — .� Y� J Z III ea co pg
.f ‹, ..d +w YYY -
N s F _, Csy of Tigard
e _ } -r „„A Dp R 13125 SW Hall Blvd
ee J i ?tGARDow Tigard,OR 97223 e
`"` ^� 503 639-4171 a
'EC:
RR ,_„ 1 441WWW.IIgUrd-or gov TlunhD
7:ELIMIN :1
C .. ..:;P
1- Wi
Oho Ij C a
b'J J .a N Q
y (i)1)0. m
w
EL'La M.SE.LToOOS y
30' 30' r- '-
g =
1
cr+1" "J . cy ire
c , E 1'OE
d I Vc''.
SITE VISUALW U t
CLEARANCE AREA m m AR
-. DE
SW BSTH AVE I DTP) aim $
E1 91 avEC.611,005 A 9n
��.. _ _ _ a VEGETATED f
t !![6e
t y A'.., .1x up CORRIDOR g
wz�s $i C a n
" @8 SY sp. E2lI
1 /
33
y �. - I is 3^ aFR
N I WETLAND Li")
' __ i N BOUNOAR
..17- 7.--i .. .
1 .,,- , _____ „.
,. :
J . 1
REMOVE E%LSTINO ,_,.....,,- - , ,
.LO'bi£ 3.1 E.VIADON
CURB TIGHT SIDE WAIN ALL ONdRE SIDEWALK ON AREAS I +
&RECONSTRUCT WITH TO BE{'CRUSHCONCRETEED
ON E.Of
? ]!{•-0•CRUSHED ROCK J ry
5'PIAMFR STRIP ..p :� ITYR) '''')A-
...' dQ
p ti ¢ f 'S
yA ETR.Q 1V ; 17.
2 Ba
11
NA1l amen I'a O
INBROYBRNT 1 : G"'+. I.. i - B
6_i
•
'. y�AA1a.r i ` w
.9S'9Zi M.241O,00N IT• .r YO
..'� p g
/--10' / may `— i n ,o rrr _
x a.
W
d� L P f k i N
•1- cc
dy�Y d. v.Aso I W
�N �y`Iy = v 9$
r.�..rw.aT
BEET .a�
SW SPRUCE STREETr-scay..m s.E
ETA EULER TO ETA NUM C2
ter,
IINp.1UIT I or
1 14 IR O UI PRELIMINARY FOR REVIEW ONLY 14
1
MEETING
RECORDS
: 5 4 J
• City of Tigard - 5 (JG
TIGARD
Hearings Officer Agenda '�` "`�
0
MEETING DATE: December 22, 2014, 7:00 p.m.
MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard—Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223
STAFF REPORTS: Available to the public 7 days prior to the hearing date
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer
meetings by noon on the Friday prior to the meeting. Please call 503-639-2438 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (1DD -
Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request,the City will also endeavor to arrange for qualified sign language
interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as
possible. To request such services,please notify the City of Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m. no less than one(1) week
prior to the meeting date at the same phone numbers listed above so that we can make the appropriate arrangements.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PUBLIC HEARING
2.1 JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH
Conditional Use Permit (Cup) 2014-00003
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a major modification to a conditional use permit for the
construction of a 7,000 square foot accessory building to the existing church. The proposed new building will
be used for classrooms,recreation and other various church related functions. The building is proposed to be
sited near the front of the property, where the dwelling and playground were located. Access to the site will
continue to be from SW Spruce Street at the existing church driveway.
LOCATION: 8500 SW Spruce Street; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 1S136CB,Tax Lot 04400.
ZONES: R-12: medium-density residential district. The R-12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a
full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional
uses are also permitted conditionally.
R-25: medium high-density residential district. The R-25 zoning district is designed to
accommodate existing housing of all types and new attached single-family and multifamily housing units at a
minimum lot size of 1,480 square feet. A limited amount of neighborhood commercial uses is permitted
outright and a wide range of civic and institutional uses are permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390,
18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
3. OTHER BUSINESS
4. ADJOURNMENT
HEARINGS OFFICER AGENDA— DECEMBER 22, 2014
City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 1
Depending on the number of people wishing to testify, the Tigard Hearing's Officer may limit the
amount of time each person has to speak. We ask you to limit your oral comments to 3 - 5 minutes.
The Hearing's Officer may further limit time if necessary. Written comments are always appreciated
by the Hearing's Officer to supplement oral testimony.
AGENDA ITEM NO.: 2.1 DATE: DECEMBER 22, 2014
PAGE 1 OF 1
FILE NAME: JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH
CASE NOS.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2014-00003
IF YOU WISH TO TESTIFY ON THE ITEM INDICATED ABOVE,
PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME, ADDRESS & INCLUDE YOUR ZIP CODE
PROPONENT OF APPLICATION OPPONENT OF APPLICATION
- (Speaking In Favor or Neutral)- - (Speaking Against)-
Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. I Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No.
x 2o1f fur 2L7 wr
if 17 C t 4772/
Iskame, Zip Code and Phone No. I Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No.
St5 Soj -1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
�
Name,Address,Zip Code andne Pho No. I Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No.
Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No.
Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. —I Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No.
_ _ _ _ _ _ —I_- - — - — -
Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No. I Name,Address,Zip Code and Phone No.
Agenda Item: 1
Heating Date:December 22.2014 Time:7:00PM
STAFF REPORT TO THE
HEARINGS OFFICER
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD
120 DAYS = 2/7/2015
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH
CASE NOS: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) CUP2014-00003
APPLICANT/ Japanese International Baptist Church
OWNER: Kenji Yokoi
8500 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97224
APPLICANT'S CESNW, Inc.
REP: Tony Weller
13190 SW 68`"Parkway, Suite 150
Tigard, OR 97223
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a major modification to a conditional use
permit for the construction of a 7,000 square foot accessory building to the existing
church. The proposed new building will be used for classrooms, recreation and
other various church related functions. The building is proposed to be sited near the
front of the property, where the dwelling and playground were located. Access to
the site will continue to be from SW Spruce Street at the existing church driveway.
LOCATION: 8500 SW Spruce Street; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 1S136CB, Tax Lot
04400.
ZONING: R-12: medium-density residential district. The R-12 zoning district is designed to
accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square
feet.A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
R-25: medium high-density residential district. The R-25 zoning district is designed
to accommodate existing housing of all types and new attached single-family and
multifamily housing units at a minimum lot size of 1,480 square feet. A limited
amount of neighborhood commercial uses is permitted outright and a wide range of
civic and institutional uses are permitted conditionally.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705,
18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Hearings Officer find that the proposed Modification to the existing
Conditional Use will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City and meets the applicable
approval standards as outlined in Section VI of this report. Therefore, Staff recommends APPROVAL,
subject to the following recommended Conditions of Approval.
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 1 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY SITE WORK
The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents
and/or plans that address the following requirements to the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT ATTN: Gary Pagenstecher, 503-718-2434. The cover letter shall clearly identify
where in the submittal the required information is found:
1. Prior to site work, the project arborist shall perform a site inspection for tree protection measures,
document compliance/non-compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification
with a signature of approval directly to the city manager or designee within one week of the site
inspection.
2. The project arborist shall perform twice monthly site inspections for tree protection measures
during periods of active site development and construction, document compliance/non-
compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval
directly to the project planner within one week of the site inspection.
3. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit to the City of Tigard the current Inventory Data
Collection fee for urban forestry plan implementation. The inventory fee is $958.00 ($147. first
tree; $28 x 22 additional planted (16) and existing (7) trees;$195 for 1 stand of trees).
4. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide a tree establishment bond that meets the
requirements of the Urban Forestry Manual Section 11, Part 2. The bond amount is $7,056.
(16 planted trees x $441/tree)
5. The applicant shall provide a franchise hauler service provider letter confirming the existing facility
has adequate capacity.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tgard-or.gov) for
review and approval:
6. Prior to any work on site, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to
cover street improvements,public utility issues,and any other work in the public right-of-way. Six (6)
sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering
Department. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and
telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the"Permittee",and
who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. Failure to provide accurate
information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents.
7. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City Engineer for the street
design which is anticipated to include a 16-foot paved half width plus an 5-foot planter, 5-foot
sidewalk street trees,lights and any required signs.
8. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City Engineer of a design
access report.
9. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City Engineer and other
appropriate agencies for the final design of the storm drainage system to serve the site and any
downstream impacts. Revise plans to show Spruce Street draining to existing drainage along the
north side of the street. Submit the area of untreated runoff.
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 2 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
10. Prior to any work on site the applicant shall obtain city and CWS approval of the complete design
of the stormwater detention facilities and maintenance plans for them, including maintenance
requirements and provisions for any treatments used.
11. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall provide documented approval from the Tualatin
Valley Water District (TVWD) of the design of the proposed water and fire service.
12. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue
(TVF&R) for the planned access and hydrant location.
13. Prior to any ground disturbance on the site, the applicant shall obtain an erosion control permit
issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act. The plan
shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual,
February 2003 edition (and any subsequent versions or updates)."
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A
BUILDING PERMIT:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tigard-or.gov) for
review and approval:
14. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain all permits and service provider letters
necessary from all appropriate agencies (such as Washington County, Tualatin Valley Water
Department and Clean Water Services) for all work to be done on site.
15. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain approval from Tualatin Valley Fire
and Rescue.
16. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall demonstrate that the reconstructed sewer
lateral,including portions that are not replaced, meet standards.
17. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain city approval of plans for the
construction of the stormwater treatment facilities and a Storm Water Connection Authorization.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION:
The applicant shall contact the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN:
Gary Pagenstecher 503-718-2434.
18. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall call for a final planning inspection to ensure the
project was completed as shown on the approved plan.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tigard-or.gov) for
review and approval:
19. Prior to final inspection, all elements of the proposed infrastructure (such as transportation,
sanitary sewer, storm drainage, water, etc.) shall be in place and operational with accepted
maintenance plans. The developer's engineer shall provide written certification that all
improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering
and construction practices, and are of high grade, prior to city acceptance of the development's
improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance.
20. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall obtain an approved Washington County Facility Permit
for the complete construction of required street improvements.
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 3 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
•
21. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall obtain city and CWS approval of the complete
construction of the stormwater treatment facilities and maintenance plans. (Contact Brian
Wheatley at 503-718-2610).
22. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall provide a final sight distance report.
23. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue
(TVF&R) for access and hydrant location and any other necessary construction.
24. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall submit payment of $5,950 for the fee in-lieu of
relocating utilities underground.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION.
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Proposal:
The applicant is requesting approval of a major modification to a conditional use permit for the
construction of a 7,000 square foot accessory building to the existing church. The proposed new building
will be used for classrooms, recreation and other various church related functions. The building is
proposed to be sited near the front of the property, where the dwelling and playground were located.
Access to the site will continue to be from SW Spruce Street at the existing church driveway.
Site I I istory:
The subject site began as two parcels that were annexed into the City of Tigard in 1993 (ZCZ93-0003).
The original church was permitted through a conditional use permit in 1994 (CUP94-00007). There was
also a minor modification (MMD2000-00018) for the addition of a modular building to be used for
classroom space. In 2007, a lot line adjustment (MIS2007-00020) was done to adjust the lot lines of the
two parcels which were combined with a lot line adjustment in 2013 (LLA2013-00005). No other land use
records were found.
Vicinity Information:
The 3.06 acre site is bordered by SW Spruce Street to the north and existing single family homes to the
south, east and west. The property contains an existing residence, detached garage, church buildings and
associated parking and landscaping.
Neighbor Comments:
The applicant held a formal neighborhood meeting on November 14,2013 with 5 neighbors in attendance.
Some of the concerns raised included increased traffic and parking demand, noise, impact to the wetland,
privacy with the 25 foot buffer, design and height of the building and required street improvements. The
City received two written comments:
Naomi B. Mimnaugh, 8545 SW Joelle Ct., an adjacent neighbor to the west, is concerned that buffering,
screening, and parking standards be met with the proposed development. In addition, she identifies noise,
graffiti, and noxious vegetation issues that are addressed through the municipal code.
Response: Buffering, screening and parking standards are addressed in the findings for the applicable
code sections below in this staff report. Noise, graffiti, and noxious vegetation issues are addressed
through code compliance procedures, separate from this land use review.
Dr. Gene and Vivian Davis, 10875 SW 896 Avenue, neighbors across Hall Blvd to the west, requests
approval of the proposed development, citing the Church's beneficial influence in the community.
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 4 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
SECTION IV. REPORT MAKING PROCEDURES. PERMITS AND USE
Use Classification
Chapter 18.130 lists the Use Categories used in the Development Code. The proposed expansion is part of
the church and is considered a Religious Institution use and is permitted as a conditional use in the R-12
and R-25 zone.
Summary of Land Use Permits and Decision-making Procedures
Pursuant to Section 18.330.020.B, upon the director determining that the proposed modification to an
existing conditional use plan is a major modification, the applicant shall submit a new application in
accordance with Section 18.390.050, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.330.030A. Type IIIA
procedures apply to quasi-judicial actions that predominantly apply discretionary approval criteria. Type
IIIA actions are decided by the Hearings Officer with appeals being heard by the City Council.
The proposed development meets criteria (d) an increase in floor area by more than 10%. Therefore, the
proposal is a major modification of the existing conditional church use.
SECTION V.SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Staff has reviewed the proposal for consistency with the following code sections. Findings for these code
sections are in Section VI of this report.
A. Applicable Development Code Standards
18.330 - Conditional Use
18.360 - Site Development Review
18.705 -Access Egress and Circulation
18.725 Environmental Performance Standards
18.745 -Landscaping and Screening
18.755—Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage
18.765 - Off-Street Parking and Loading
18.790 - Urban Forestry Plan
18.795—Visual Clearance Areas
18.810 - Street and Utility Improvement Standards
B. Impact Study and Rough Proportionality Analysis
SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW AND APPROVAL CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
A. APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT CODE STANDARDS AND APPROVAL CRITERIA
18.330 CONDITIONAL USE
18.330.010 Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use
may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions
of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on
surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis.
The applicant requests approval of an expansion of an existing religious institution use on the subject site.
The following standards in this chapter ensure the proposed development will not adversely impact
surrounding uses and public facilities.
18.330.030 Approval Standards and Conditions of Approval
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 5 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
A. Approval standards. The hearings officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an
application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use based on findings of fact
with respect to each of the following criteria:
1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use;
As described in the applicant's narrative, the 3-acre site is adequately sized to accommodate the new
building and meet required setbacks. The site exceeds the minimum lot size for religious institutions which
is 20,000 square feet. This approval standard is met.
2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size,shape,
location, topography and natural features;
The site contains a flat area along the north portion of the lot, along SW Spruce Street. The building is
proposed in that area and away from the wetland located on the south portion of the lot. The impacts
from the proposed improvements to the site can be accommodated by the site's size, shape, location,
topography, and natural features. This standard is met.
3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; and
As described in the applicant's impact study of their submittal, there is adequate capacity in the public
facilities that serve the site. The frontage improvements along SW Spruce Street and storm water facilities
shall be constructed as part of this proposal. The proposal does not require any sewer and/or water
connections. This standard is met.
4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this
chapter.
The proposed site is zoned R-12 and R-25. Table 18.510.2 includes development standards in residential
zones related to lot size, width, coverage, and building setbacks, height, and landscape requirements. The
table below compares the proposed dimensions with the applicable standards in the base zone.
TABLE 18.510.2
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES
STANDARD R-12 R-25 Proposed
Minimum Lot Size
-Detached unit 3,050 sq.ft. 3,050 sq. ft(SF) 133,293 sq.ft.
-Duplexes 1,480 sq. ft(MF)
-Attached unit
Average Minimum Lot Width None None N/A
Maximum Lot Coverage [2] 80% 80°./0 34%
Minimum Setbacks
-Front yard 15-20 ft. 15-20 ft. 25 ft.
-Side facing street on
corner&through lots 10-20 ft. 10-20 ft. N/A
-Side yard 5-10 ft.[1] 5-10 ft. [1] 20 ft.
-Rear yard 15-20 ft. 15-20 ft. 100+ft.
-Side or rear yard abutting more 30 ft. 30 ft. N/A
restrictive zoning district
-Distance between property line
and front of garage 20 ft. N/A
Maximum Height 35 ft. 45 ft. 21-26 ft.
Minimum Landscape Requirement 20% 20% 69%
11]Except this shall not apply to attached units on the lot line on which the units are attached.
12]Lot coverage includes all buildings and impervious surfaces.
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 6 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
As shown in the applicant's submittal and in the comparison table above, the applicable development
standards of the underlying zoning district are met.
5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050 are met; and
Section 18.330.050.B.8 contains the following standards for Religious institutions:
a. Minimum lot size shall be 20,000 square feet;
The site is approximately 3 acres; no new lots are proposed.
b. Setbacks:
i. The front yard setback shall be a minimum of 25 feet;
ii. On corner lots and through lots,the setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet,plus meet visual
clearance areas, Chapter 18.795;
iii. The side yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet;
iv. The rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet; and
v. Each setback shall be increased five feet for every 10 feet of building height over 45 feet.
As shown on sheet C2 of the plans, the front yard setback is 25 feet, the side yard setback is 20 feet and
the rear yard is 100 + feet. As shown in MGA Sheet # 3, the proposed building is 25 feet in height, less
than the 45-foot height threshold for increasing setbacks. The applicable conditional use requirements for
religious institutions are met.
6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this Code including but not
limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; Chapter
18.790, Urban Forestry Plan; and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable,
are met.
The supplementary requirements that are applicable in this case include the following chapters of the
Community Development Code: 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.705, Access, Egress and
Circulation; 18.725, Performance Standards; 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; 18.765, Off-Site Parking
and Loading; 18.790, Urban Forestry Plan; and 18.810 Street and Utility Improvements Standards. As
reviewed below in this report, all supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of the code are
either met or conditioned to be met.
FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the proposed major modification meets, or can be
conditioned to meet, the conditional use approval standards. Therefore staff recommends
that the hearings officer approve the proposed development with conditions, as identified
in the findings below.
18.360 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
18.360.090 Approval Criteria
The director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving,
approving with conditions, or denying an application:
The following criteria are found not to apply to the proposal:
C. Exterior elevations; E. Private outdoor area—Multifamily use; F. Shared outdoor recreation
areas—Multifamily use;G. Development within and adjacent to the 100-year floodplain;
The following criteria are discussed further in this decision and, therefore,will not be addressed in this section:
K. Landscaping; L. Drainage; M. Provision for the Disabled; and N. All Provisions & Regulations of
Underlying Zone Apply.
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 7 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
A. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title, including Chapter 18.810,
Street and Utility Standards;
As shown in the findings in other sections of this staff report the applicable requirements of this title,
including Chapter 18.810,have been met or have been conditioned to be met.
B. Relationship to the natural and physical environment—Nonresidential development.
1. Buildings shall be:
a. Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible
based upon existing site conditions;
b. Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding;
c. Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light,
air circulation, and fire-fighting; and
d. Oriented with consideration for sun and wind.
2. Innovative methods and techniques to reduce impacts to site hydrology and fish and
wildlife habitat shall be considered based on surface water drainage patterns, identified per
Section 18.810.100.A.3 and the City of Tigard "Significant Habitat Areas Map." Methods
and techniques for consideration may include, but are not limited to the following:
a. Water quality facilities (for infiltration, retention,detention and/or treatment);
b. Pervious pavement;
c. Soil amendment;
d. Roof runoff controls;
e. Fencing to guide animals toward safe passageways;
f. Re-directed outdoor lighting to reduce spill-off into habitat areas;
g. Preservation of existing vegetative and canopy cover.
The southern portion of the site includes a tributary to Ash Creek. However, the proposed development is
located approximately 250 feet north of sensitive areas on the site in a level area adjacent to the SW Spruce
Street. The Tree Preservation and Removal Plan (Sheet L1) shows one tree being removed. A stormwater
detention and treatment facility is included in the plan. The proposed building has been sited and the
stormwater system has been designed to preserve natural features of the site.These criteria are met.
D. Buffering, screening and compatibility between adjoining uses—Nonresidential
development.
1. Nonresidential development shall provide buffering between different types of land uses—
for example, between commercial and industrial uses and residential and commercial
uses—and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the
type and extent of the buffer:
a. The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution,
filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier;
b. The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height;
c. The direction(s) from which buffering is needed;
d. The required density of the buffering; and
e. Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile.
2. On-site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas,
storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and
heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in
determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening:
a. What needs to be screened;
b. The direction from which it is needed;
c. How dense the screen needs to be;
d. Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile; and
e. Whether the screening needs to be year around.
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 8 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
The proposed accessory church use, permitted conditionally in residential zones, is not identified in the
buffer matrix as requiring a buffer. The building is proposed to be setback 20 feet from the property line
of the adjacent single-family residence to the west. The Landscape plan shows the side yard is landscaped
with trees, shrubs and ground cover, which will help mitigate the visual impact to the neighbor. The
building is proposed to be 25 feet in height, not greater than would be expected from 2-story single family
development. The proposed development is reasonably compatible with existing adjacent residential use.
These criteria are met.
H. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention—
Nonresidential development.
1. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets
or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined
to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and
to establish maintenance responsibility; and
2. These areas may be defined by,but not limited to:
a. A deck,patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine,
b. A trellis or arbor,
c. A change in elevation or grade,
d. A change in the texture of the path material,
e. Sign, or
f. Landscaping.
As shown on the Site Plan (Sheet C2 , the front and rear buildingentrances are covered and paved areas,
)
with the street front entry grade separated from the sidewalk. As shown on the proposed Landscape Plan
(Sheet LI.10) planting beds also help define these areas as private. Public and private spaces are
demarcated sufficiently to prevent confusion and any crime that may be related to that. These criteria are
met.
I. Crime prevention and safety—Nonresidential development.
1. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the
occupants;
2. Interior service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others;
3. Mailboxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic;
4. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas
vulnerable to crime; and
5. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in
potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade changes.
Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet
which is sufficient to illuminate a person.
As shown in the applicant's submittal, there are first floor windows on the north (street), east (access way),
and south (courtyard) sides of the proposed building to provide surveillance to deter crime. No service
areas are proposed. The applicant states that recessed down lights are proposed for the north and south
entrances. The west exit will have a wall mount fixture with appropriate shielding to prevent glare or light
intrusion on neighboring properties. In addition, a street light, if warranted at the time of development
engineering review,will be installed along the Spruce Street frontage to the north. As proposed, the crime
prevention and safety standards are met.
J. Public transit.
1. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development
proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route;
The site is located within 200 feet of SW Hall Blvd. However, the nearest bus stop is 1,600 feet north at Hall
and Locust Street. This criterion does not apply.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the proposal has met all of the applicable site development
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 9 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
review approval criteria.
18.705 ACCESS, EGRESS,AND CIRCULATION
18.705.020 Applicability of Provisions
A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including
the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050),
and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which
changes the access requirements.
The application is for a new 7,000 square foot multi-purpose building. Therefore these provisions apply.
18.705.030 General Provisions
B. Requires site plans be presented for approval showing how access requirements arc to be
fulfilled in accordance with this chapter.
The application includes a site and utility plan for a proposed multi-purpose building. This provision is
met.
D. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in 18.705.030.H and I shall
connect directly with a public or private street approved by the city for public use and shall be
maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis.
As shown on the applicant's site plan, an existing driveway serving the church directly connects to SW
Spruce Street which provides access to the site. The existing driveway serving the house will be removed.
This provision is met.
F. Required walkway location. On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following
standards:
1. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of
stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which
provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between
buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless
impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and
neighboring developments.
2. Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multifamily developments, each
residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common
open space and recreation facilities.
3. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings
shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically
separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six-inch vertical separation
(curbed) or a minimum three-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of
traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping,
pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum
of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches,
bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards.
4. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt,
stone, brick, other pervious paving surfaces, etc. Any pervious paving surface must be designed
and maintained to remain well-drained. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as
needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such
pathways are provided in addition to required pathways.
As shown in the applicant's site plan (Sheet C2), the applicant proposes walkway improvements to
accommodate the new building.These provisions are met.
H.Access management.
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 10 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
1. An access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies
design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight
distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the city and
AASHTO (depending on jurisdiction of facility).
A driveway along Spruce Street will provide access to the site. The application includes a preliminary sight
distance analysis concluding that, with minor vegetation removal, adequate sight distance is available at the
site accesses. It appears that this standard can be met, but sight distance will need to be verified at final
design and after construction to verify that no changes have been made or objects added that would
obscure visibility.
Prior to any work on site, the applicant's engineer shall submit a preliminary access report to City
engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and streets to be used by site traffic are safe by
meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by the City and
AASHTO.
Upon completion of the improvements, the applicant's engineer shall submit a final access report to City
engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and streets to be used by site traffic are safe by
meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by the City and
AASHTO. The applicant shall obtain approval of this report prior to final inspection.
2. Driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or
arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of
traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback
from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-
way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may
be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from city engineer review of
a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a
project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for
shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the
driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible.
The driveway is about 350 feet from Hall Blvd., the nearest collector or arterial street. This is outside the
influence area any collector or arterial street. This provision is met.
3. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The
minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet.
4. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet.
SW Spruce Street is a local street requiring a minimum spacing of 125 feet. There are no local streets
within 125 feet.These provisions are met.
J. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use.
1. Vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less
than as provided in Table 18.705.3.
See TABLE 18.705.3 below on next page
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 11 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
TABLE 18.705.3
VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS:
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES
Required Parking Minimum Number of Minimum Access Minimum Pavement
Spaces Driveways Required Width
0-99 1 30' 24' curbs required
2 30' 24' curbs required
100+ or
1 50' 40' curbs required
2. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located
to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances;
3. Additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site
development review.
The proposed religious institution is a civic use and not included in the table for commercial and industrial
uses. However, the existing parking lot has less than 50 spaces, which would require one 30-foot access
width with 24-foot curbs, as applied in the table. These provisions are met.
FINDING: The proposal meets the applicable access and egress provisions. To ensure compliance, the
following conditions of approval are imposed.
CONDITIONS: Prior to any work on site, the applicant's engineer shall submit a preliminary access
report to City engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and streets to be
used by site traffic are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and
deceleration standards as set by the City and AASHTO.
Upon completion of the improvements, the applicant's engineer shall submit a final
access report to City engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and
streets to be used by site traffic are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight
distance and deceleration standards as set by the City and AASHTO. The applicant
shall obtain approval of this report prior to final inspection.
18.725 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
18.725.030 Performance Standards
A. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 6.02.410 through
6.02.470 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply.
B. Visible emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning
district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source
emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water
(steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules
for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply.
C. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is
permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property
line of the use concerned.
D. Odors. The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily
detectable at any point beyond the propertyline of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ
rules for odors (340-028-090) apply.
E. Glare and heat. No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high
temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be
permitted; and
1. There shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot
line of the source, and
2. These regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 12 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title.
F. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be
maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or
create a health hazard.
FINDING: According to the applicant's narrative, the proposed use will not generate excessive noise,
visible emissions, disallowed vibration, odor, glare or heat. Recessed down lights are
proposed for the north and south entrances. The west exit will have a wall mount fixture
with appropriate shielding to prevent glare or light intrusion on neighboring properties.
Materials will be stored and grounds maintained so as to not attract or aid the propagation
of insets or rodents or create a health hazard. The city's code compliance procedures will
ensure these performance standards will continue to be met. These standards are met.
18.745 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
18.745.040 Street Trees
A. Street trees shall be required as part of the approval process for Conditional Use (Type
III), Downtown Design Review (Type II and III), Minor Land Partition (Type II),
Planned Development (Type III), Site Development Review (Type II) and Subdivision
(Type II and III)permits.
B. The minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by dividing the linear
amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet. When the result
is a fraction, the minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by
rounding to the nearest whole number.
C. Street trees required by this section shall be planted according to the Street Tree Planting
Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual.
D. Street trees required by this section shall be provided adequate soil volumes according to
the Street Tree Soil Volume Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual.
E. Street trees required by this section shall be planted within the right of way whenever
practicable according to the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual.
Street trees may be planted no more than 6 feet from the right of way according to the
Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual when planting within the
right of way is not practicable.
FINDING: The subject site includes 170 lineal feet of frontage along SW Spruce Street. A total of 4
street trees are required for this proposal. The Landscape Plan (Sheet L1.10) shows 4
proposed street trees. The Soil Volume Plan (Sheet L4) shows how the street tree soil
volume standards are met. These standards are met.
18.755 MIXED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLE STORAGE
18.755.010 Purpose and Applicability
B. Applicability. The mixed solid waste and source separated recyclable storage standards shall
apply to new multi-unit residential buildings containing five or more units and nonresidential
construction that are subject to full site plan or design review; and are located within urban zones
that allow, outright or by condition, for such uses.
18.755.040Methods of Demonstrating Compliance
A. Alternative methods of compliance. An applicant shall choose one of the following four
methods to demonstrate compliance:
1. Minimum standards;
2. Waste assessment;
3. Comprehensive recycling plan; or
4. Franchised hauler review and sign-off.
According to the applicant's narrative, the Church has chosen the Franchise hauler review and sign off
option since the current service level meets both the needs of the Church and the hauler. According the
applicant the church has a very small waste stream that is currently served by Waste Management with 2
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 13 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
trash carts and 2 recycle carts that are wheeled to the curb for weekly pick up. The neighborhood is
residential, so the weekly pick up from the Church coincides with the neighborhood schedule and is
currently working well for the Church. However, the applicant does not address whether the new building
will generate additional waste and has not provided a service provider letter that confirms adequate storage
capacity or access.Therefore, a condition of approval is imposed to ensure facilities are adequate.
The applicant shall submit a franchise hauler service provider letter confirming the existing facility has
adequate capacity.
18.755.050Location, Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas
B.Location Standards
1. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co-located with
the storage area for residual mixed solid waste;
2.Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code
requirements;
3. Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations,
and can combine both interior and exterior locations.
4. Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior
storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a
public or private street;
5. Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance
security for users;
6. Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the
minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the areas used for
storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050.C,
design standards;
7. The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area
will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to
the site.
According to the applicant's narrative, the two trash carts and two recycling carts are currently kept on the
west side of the main church building, which is an area that is not visible from the parking lot or
neighboring properties.As the location is existing and satisfactory to the franchised hauler, these standards
are met.
FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, not all of the applicable standards have been met, but can
be met with the following condition of approval.
CONDITION: The applicant shall submit a franchise hauler service provider letter confirming the
existing facility has adequate capacity.
18.765 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS
18.765.030 General Provisions
A. New construction. At the time of the erection of a new structure within any zoning district, off-
street vehicle parking will be provided in accordance with Section 18.765.070.
FINDING: Table 18.765.2 requires 1.0 parking space per 3 seats in the main assembly hall. The
applicant is proposing an accessory use to the church to serve the existing parishioners.
Since no additional seats are being proposed, no change to the parking is required.
Therefore, this section is not applicable to this application.
18.790 URBAN FORESTRY PLAN
18.790.030 Urban Forestry Plan Requirements
A. Urban forestry plan requirements. An urban forestry plan shall:
1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect)
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 14 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor (the project arborist),
except for minor land partitions that can demonstrate compliance with effective tree
canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes
only;
The applicant's submittal includes an Urban Forestry Plan prepared and approved by Landscape Architect
David Anderson.This standard is met.
2. Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in the Urban Forestry
Manual (UFM);
A tree preservation and removal plan (Sheet L1) was submitted identifying all trees proposed for
preservation and for removal. This standard is met.
3. Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; and
An existing tree plan was provided that identifies the canopy of existing open grown trees. According to
the supplemental report, no concerns regarding soil conditions were identified. The project arborist has
signed the Urban Forestry site plan and attested that the plan meets the tree canopy site plan standards.
This standard is met.
4. Meet the supplemental report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual.
A supplemental report dated October 27, 2014, was prepared by the project Landscape Architect, David
Anderson; Anderson & Associates. The report includes the required inventory data for the existing open
grown trees (UFM Section 10, Part 3, and Subsection D) protection measures, consisting of a 5 foot metal
fence secured to the ground located along the dripline of preserved trees which shall be in place prior to
any site work.
As submitted, the project meets the effective tree canopy in accordance with UFM Section 10, Part 3.
Because the site is zoned R-12/R-25, the required effective tree canopy is 33% for the entire site.
According to the supplemental report, 47% effective tree canopy is provided. This standard is met.
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the urban forestry plan requirements have been fully met.
18.790.060 Urban Forestry Plan Implementation
B. Tree Establishment. The establishment of all trees shown to be planted in the tree canopy
site plan (per 18.790.030 A.3) and supplemental report (per 18.790.030.A.4) of the previously
approved urban forestry plan shall be guaranteed and required according to the tree
establishment requirements in Section 11, part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual.
The applicant's proposal does not address tree establishment. Therefore, a condition of approval is added
for the applicant to provide a tree establishment bond that meets the requirements of the Urban Forestry
Manual Section 11, Part 2.
D. Urban forest inventory. Spatial and species specific data shall be collected according to the
urban forestry inventory requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual for each open grown
tree and area of stand grown trees in the tree canopy site plan (per Section 18.790.030.A.3)
and supplemental report (per Section 18.790.030.A.4) of a previously approved urban
forestry plan.
Section 11, Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual states that prior to any ground disturbance work, the
applicant shall provide a fee to cover the city's cost of collecting and processing the inventory data for the
entire urban forestry plan. This can be met through a condition of approval.
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 15 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the applicable urban forestry inventory standards have not
been fully met. To ensure compliance,the following conditions of approval are imposed.
CONDITIONS: Prior to site work, the project arborist shall perform a site inspection for tree
protection measures, document compliance/non-compliance with the urban
forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to
the city manager or designee within one week of the site inspection.
The project arborist shall perform twice monthly site inspections for tree
protection measures during periods of active site development and construction,
document compliance/non-compliance with the urban forestry plan and send
written verification with a signature of approval directly to the project planner
within one week of the site inspection.
Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit to the City of Tigard the current
Inventory Data Collection fee for urban forestry plan implementation.
Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide a tree establishment bond that meets
the requirements of the Urban Forestry Manual Section 11,Part 2.
18.795 VISUAL CLEARANCE
18.795.030 Visual Clearance Requirements
A. At corners. Except within the CBD zoning district a visual clearance area shall be
maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to the intersection of two streets, a street
and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street.
B. Obstructions prohibited. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting,
fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional
utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or
where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this
height may be located in this area,provided all branches below eight feet are removed.
FINDING: The site plan shows the visual clearance areas where the existing access connects to SW
Spruce Street. This standard is met. •
18.810.030 STREETS AND UTILITY STANDARDS
A. Improvements.
1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to
a public street
2. No development shall occur unless streets within the development meet the standards
of this chapter
3. No development shall occur unless the streets adjacent to the development meet the
standards of this chapter, provided, however, that a development may be approved if the
adjacent street does not meet the standards but half-street improvements meeting the
standards of this title are constructed adjacent to the development.
E. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths, requires minimum rights-of-way and street
widths for streets adjacent to or within a development.
No streets are proposed within the development. The development is adjacent to SW Spruce Street, a local
Washington County street. The Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has
submitted required conditions of approval including a Facility Permit. Before final inspection, all Conditions
of Approval must be met.As conditioned,this standard is met.
H. Street alignment and connections.
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 16 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
1. Full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is
required except where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways,
pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions
existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection
may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit
construction.
Additional street connections in this area are precluded by surrounding existing development.
This standard is met.
N. Grades and curves.
1. Grades shall not exceed 10% on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other
street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up
to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet); and
2. Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the city engineer.
The existing grades along the Spruce Street frontage are minimal. No grade changes are proposed. This
standard is met.
Traffic Study: Section 18.810.030.CC requires a traffic study for development proposals meeting
certain criteria.
The proposed building is not expected to generate additional traffic. A traffic report is not required.
18.810.050 Easements
A. Easements. Easements for sewers, drainage, water mains, electric lines or other public
utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions, and where a
development is traversed by a watercourse or drainageway, there shall be provided a
stormwater easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of
the watercourse.
B. Utility easements. A property owner proposing a development shall make arrangements
with the city, the applicable district, and each utility franchise for the provision and
dedication of utility easements necessary to provide full services to the development. The
city's standard width for public main line utility easements shall be 15 feet unless otherwise
specified by the utility company, applicable district, or city engineer.
The site is fully served by existing utilities. No easements are required. This standard is met.
18.810.070 Sidewalks
A. Sidewalks. All industrial streets and private streets shall have sidewalks meeting city
standards along at least one side of the street. All other streets shall have sidewalks
meeting city standards along both sides of the street. A development may be approved if
an adjoining street has sidewalks on the side adjoining the development, even if no
sidewalk exists on the other side of the street.
B. Requirement of developers.
2. If there is an existing sidewalk on the same side of the street as the development within
300 feet of a development site in either direction, the sidewalk shall be extended from the
site to meet the existing sidewalk, subject to rough proportionality (even if the sidewalk
does not serve a neighborhood activity center).
According to the applicant's narrative and plan set, the existing sidewalk will be removed and
reconstructed to standard along with new sidewalk proposed to the west in front of the proposed building.
In addition, the applicant's narrative finds there are no existing sidewalks to the east of the site. There are
no existing sidewalks west of the site on Spruce Street. The closest existing sidewalk is south of Spruce
Street on Hall Blvd and is over 300 feet from the northwest corner of the site as measured along the
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 17 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
existing roadway. The Development Review Engineer states no additional sidewalks are required. These
standards are met.
18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers
A. Sewers required. Sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development and to
connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in
Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as
adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or
amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan.
B. Sewer plan approval. The city engineer shall approve all sanitary sewer plans and proposed
systems prior to issuance of development permits involving sewer service.
C. Over-sizing. Proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development
within the area as projected by the comprehensive plan.
The existing private sewer line serving the house will serve the proposed building. No public sewers are
proposed or required.
18.810.100 Storm Drainage
A. General provisions. The director and city engineer shall issue a development permit only
where adequate provisions for stormwater and floodwater runoff have been made, and:
1.The storm water drainage system shall be separate and independent of any sanitary
sewerage system;
2.Where possible, inlets shall be provided so surface water is not carried across any
intersection or allowed to flood any street; and
3.Surface water drainage patterns shall be shown on every development proposal plan.
A separate storm drain is proposed for the building and impervious surfaces.
C. Accommodation of upstream drainage. A culvert or other drainage facility shall be large
enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether
inside or outside the development, and the city engineer shall approve the necessary size
of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary
and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and
including any future revisions or amendments).
Upstream drainage is limited to a portion of the Spruce Street frontage. As conditioned, these standards
can be met.
D. Effect on downstream drainage. Where it is anticipated by the city engineer that the
additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage
facility, the director and engineer shall withhold approval of the development until
provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions
have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance
with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management
(as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or
amendments).
Site runoff will be directed to a drainageway at the south end of the site. The adequacy of the drainageway
must be shown.As conditioned, these standards can be met.
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the
Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a
recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective
impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to
the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase
of impervious surfaces provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 18 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the
storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention.
The applicant's engineer has submitted preliminary detention calculations for an underground system. As
conditioned, these standards can be met.
18.810.120 Utilities
A. Underground utilities. All utility lines including, but not limited to those required for
electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall
be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted
connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary
utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000
volts or above, and:
1. The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide
the underground services;
2. The city reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities;
3. All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets
by the developer,shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and
4. Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street
improvements when service connections are made.
C. Exception to undergrounding requirement.
1. The developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding costs when the development is
proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will
serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical
difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of undergrounding in
conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis.
The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for
which undergrounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the
removal of above-ground utilities facilities.
2. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground
and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall
pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding.
There are 170 feet of existing overhead utility lines along SW Spruce. Therefore, payment of a fee in-lieu
of$35 per frontage front, or$5,950,is required prior to final inspection.
ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY
IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS:
Fire and Life Safety:
The applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) for access and hydrant
location prior to any work on site.
Public Water System:
Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) provides service in this area. The application includes a service
provider letter from TVWD stating that adequate capacity is available to provide service to the proposed
development.
Prior to any work on site the applicant shall provide documented approval from the Tualatin Valley Water
District (TVWD) of the design of water service to the site. TVWD approval of construction shall be
obtained prior to final inspection.
Grading and Erosion Control:
CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of
sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 19 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates
erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City
review and approval prior to issuance of City permits.
The applicant shall meet the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act regarding National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permits that may be needed
for this project.
The applicant shall follow all applicable requirements regarding erosion control, particularly those of the
Federal Clean Water Act, State of Oregon, Clean Water Services, and City of Tigard including obtaining
and abiding by the conditions of NPDES 1200-C or 1200-C-N permits as applicable. .
Site Permit Required:
The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site private
utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.) and driveway construction. This permit shall be obtained
prior to any work on site and prior to issuance of the building permit.
B. IMPACT STUDY
SECTION 18.390.040.B.e requires that the applicant include an impact study. The study shall
address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the
parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For
each public facility system and type of impact of the development on the public at large, public
facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community
Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either
specifically concur with the dedication of real property interest, or provide evidence which supports
the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the
projected impacts of the development.
The applicant's narrative includes an impact study that addresses impacts of the proposed development on
public facilities and services. No dedication is proposed or required. Half street improvement is proposed.
This requirement is met.
ROUGH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS
The Transportation Development Tax (IUT) is a mitigation measure required for new development and will
be paid at the time of building permits. Based on Washington County implementation figures for 2014/2015,
TDTs are expected to recapture approximately 33.0 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the
Collector and Arterial Street system. Based on the use and the size of the use proposed and upon completion
of this development,the applicant will be required to pay TDTs of approximately $8,498.
Based on the estimate, and that total TDT fees cover 33.0 percent of the impact on major street
improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this project's traffic impact is $25,751 ($8,498
0.33). The unmitigated impact is the difference between the TDT paid and the full impact,or$17,253.
FINDING: Using the above cost factors, a total of$8,498 TDT is required.
SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
The City of Tigard Police Department reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
The City of Tigard Development Engineering Division has reviewed the proposal and provided
findings which are incorporated in this report and attached as Exhibit A. Recommended conditions are
included in Section II, Conditions of Approval.
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 20 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS
Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has reviewed the proposal and
submitted required conditions of approval including the requirement for a Facility Permit. This has been
required by condition in this staff report.
Clean Water Services (CWS) has reviewed the proposal and submitted a Service Provider Letter (CWS
File Number 14-002134). In addition, CWS provided a comment letter dated November 20, 2014,
requiring a sewer and storm water connection permit prior to any work on site. This requirement is
ensured through addition of conditions of approval in this decision.
Tualatin Valley Water District reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) reviewed the proposal and has no objections to it.
Attachments
Exhibit A: Development Review Engineering Comments, December 10,2014
Exhibit B: Vicinity Map
Exhibit C: Site Plan
Exhibit D: Public Comments
PREPARED BY: ary Pa nstecher DATE
Associate Planner
/2 - /S /9
REVIEWI`D BY: ' m McGuire DATE
Assistant Community Development Director
JIBC EXPANSION PAGE 21 OF 21 CUP2014-00003
12/22/2014 PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARINGS OFFICER
• EXHIBIT A
;1 • City of Tigard
TIGARD Memorandum
To: Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner
From: Greg Berry, Project Engineer
Re: CUP 2014-03;Japanese International Baptist Church
Date: December 10, 2014
Access Management (Section 18.705)
Section 18.705.030.B requires site plans be presented for approval showing how access
requirements are to be fulfilled in accordance with this chapter.
The application ineludes a site and utility plan for a proposed multi-purpose building.
Section 18.705.030.D states that all vehicular access and egress ... shall connect directly with
a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the
required standards on a continuous basis.
A driveway directly connected to SW Spruce St. will provide access to the site. The existing
driveway to the house will be removed. This standard is met.
Section 18.705.F Required walkways
PLANNING
Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new
development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting
adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT,
Washington County, the City and/or AASHTO (depending on jurisdiction of facility).
A driveway along Spruce Street will provide access to the site. The application includes a
preliminary sight distance analysis concluding that,with minor vegetation removal, adequate sight
distance is available at the site accesses. It appears that this standard can be met,but sight distance
will need to be verified at final design and after construction to verify that no changes have been
made or objects added that would obscure visibility.
Prior to any work on site, the applicant's engineer shall submit a preliminary access report to City
engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and streets to be used by site traffic are safe by
meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by the City and
AASHTO.
Upon completion of the improvements, the applicant's engineer shall submit a final access report to
City engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and streets to be used by site traffic are safe
by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by the City and
AASHTO. The applicant shall obtain approval of this report prior to final inspection.
Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the
influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is
that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The
minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet,
measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed
driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined
from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic
engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant
must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not
possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible.
The driveway is about 350 feet from Hall Blvd., the nearest collector or arterial street. This is
outside the influence area any collector or arterial street. This standard is met.
Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets
along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an
arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be
125 feet.
SW Spruce Street is a local street requiring a minimum spacing of 125 feet. There are no local
streets within 125 feet. The standard is met.
Section 18.705.030.I includes minimum access requirements for residential use. For
multifamily use developments with 50 to 100 units,two accesses are required with a minimum
paved width of 24 feet with curbs and a 5-foot sidewalk within a 30-foot width.
A residential use is not proposed. The standard is met.
Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810):
Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private
facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are
addressed below:
Streets:
Improvements:
Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be
improved in accordance with the TDC standards.
Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a
portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC.
Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030E requires minimum rights-of-
way and street widths for streets adjacent to or within a development.
The development is adjacent to SW Spruce Street, a local Washington County street. The Washington
County Department of Land Use and Transportation has submitted required conditions of approval
including a Facility Permit. Before final inspection,all Conditions of Approval must be met.
No streets within the development are proposed.
This standard is expected to be met.
Street Alignment and Connections:
Section 18.630.040 and 18.810.030.H.1 state that full street connections with spacing of no
more than 530 feet between connections is required. Exceptions can be made where
prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments,
lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995
which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a
regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction.
Additional street connections in this area are precluded by surrounding existing development.
Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on
arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential
access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250
feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer.
The existing grades along the Spruce Street frontage are minimal. No grade changes are proposed.
This standard is met.
Traffic Study: Section 18.810.030.CC Requires a traffic study for development proposals
meeting certain criteria.
The proposed building is not expected to generate additional traffic. A traffic report is not required.
This standard may be met by condition.
Block Designs - Section 18.810.040:A states that the length,width and shape of blocks shall be
designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated,
consideration of needs for convenient access,circulation,control and safety of street traffic and
recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography.
Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall
not exceed 2,000 feet measured along the right-of-way line except:
• Where street location is precluded by natural topography,wetlands or other bodies of water
or,pre-existing development or;
• For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or
railroads.
• For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access.
Additional connections in this area are precluded by surrounding wetlands and existing
development.
Easements:
Section 18.810.050 states that easements for sewers,drainage,water mains, electric lines, or
other public utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions, and
where a development is traversed by a watercourse or drainageway, there shall be provided a
stormwater easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially to the lines of the
watercourse.
Section 18.810.050.B states that a property owner proposing a development shall make
arrangements with the city, the applicable district, and each utility franchise for the
provision and dedication of utility easements necessary to provide full services to the
development. The city's standard width for mainline easements shall be 15 feet unless
otherwise specified by the utility company, applicable district, or city engineer.
The site is fully served by existing utilities. No easements are required. This standard is met.
Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design
standards along at least one side of private and industrial streets.
No streets are proposed. This standard is met.
Section 18.810.070.B states that if there is an existing sidewalk on the same side of the street
as the development within 300 feet in either direction,the sidewalk shall be extended from
the site to meet the existing sidewalk, subject to rough proportionality.
No additional sidewalks are required.
Bike lanes: Subsection 18.819.110A requires bike lanes where identified in the Tigard TSP.
Bike lanes are not required.
Sanitary Sewers:
Sewers Requited: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each
new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the
provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water
Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions
or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan.
Sewer Plan approval: Section 18.810.090.B requires that the applicant obtain City Engineer
approval of all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prior to issuance of development
permits involving sewer service.
Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include
consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive
Plan.
The existing private sewer line serving the house will serve the proposed building. No public sewers
are proposed or required.
Storm Drainage:
General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions
for storm water and flood water runoff.
A separate storm drain is proposed for the building and impervious surfaces.
Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other
drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire
upstream drainage area,whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer
shall approve the necessary size of the facility,based on the provisions of Design and
Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean
Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments).
Upstream drainage is limited to a portion of the Spruce Street frontage. These standards may be
met by condition.
Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by
the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an
existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the
development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or
until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development
in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water
Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2007 and including any future
revisions or amendments).
Site runoff will be directed to a drainageway at the south end of the site. The adequacy of the
drainageway must be shown.This standard may be met by condition.
Storm Water Quality:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established
by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution
and Order No. 07-20) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The
facilities shall be designed in accordance with the CWS Design and Construction Standards
for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Management and shall be designed to remove 65
percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated
from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be
submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility
maintained through the year.
An extended dry basin water quality facility is proposed to treat onsite runoff. This standard may be
met by condition.
In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted
the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a
recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective
impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to
the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase
of impervious surfaces of more than 1,000 square feet provide onsite detention facilities,
unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments
adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without
detention,but a fee-in-lieu would be required.
The applicant's engineer has submitted preliminary detention calculations for an underground
system. This standard may be met by condition.
Utilities:
Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines,but not limited to those required for electric,
communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed
underground,except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes
and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities
during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and:
• The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide
the underground services;
• The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities;
• All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets
by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and
• Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street
improvements when service connections are made.
Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer
shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take
place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the
development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of
under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with
the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common,
but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding
would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground
utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not
underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's
property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding.
There are 170 feet of existing overhead utility lines along SW Spruce. Therefore,payment of a fee
in-lieu of$35 per frontage front, or$5,950,is required prior to final inspection.
Fire and Life Safety:
The applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue (TVF&R) for access and
hydrant location prior to any work on site.
Public Water System:
Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) provides service in this area. The application includes a
service provider letter from TVWD stating that adequate capacity is available to provide service to
the proposed development.
Prior to any work on site the applicant shall provide documented approval from the Tualatin Valley
Water District (TVWD) of the design of water service to the site. TVWD approval of construction
shall be obtained prior to final inspection.
Grading and Erosion Control:
CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount
of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system
resulting from development, construction,grading, excavating, clearing, and any other
activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit
an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits.
The applicant shall meet the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act regarding
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permits that
may be needed for this project.
The applicant shall follow all applicable requirements regarding erosion control,particularly those of
the Federal Clean Water Act, State of Oregon, Clean Water Services,and City of Tigard including
obtaining and abiding by the conditions of NPDES 1200-C or 1200-C-N permits as applicable. .
Site Permit Required:
The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site
private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.) and driveway construction. This permit shall be
obtained prior to any work on site and prior to issuance of the building permit.
Address Assignments:
The City of Tigard is responsible for assigning addresses for parcels within the City of Tigard. An
addressing fee in the amount of$50.00 per address shall be assessed. This fee shall be paid to the
City prior to the issuance of building permits.
Recommendations:
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ANY WORK
ON SITE:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tigard-or.gov)
for review and approval:
Prior to any work on site, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this
project to cover street improvements, public utility issues, and any other work in the public
right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to
the Engineering Department. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal
name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be
designated as the "Permittee", and who will provide the financial assurance for the public
improvements. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will
delay processing of project documents.
Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City Engineer for the
street design which is anticipated to include a 16-foot paved half width plus an 5-foot
planter, 5-foot sidewalk street trees,lights and any required signs.
Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City Engineer of a
design access report.
Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City Engineer and
other appropriate agencies for the final design of the storm drainage system to serve the site
and any downstream impacts. Revise plans to show Spruce Street draining to existing
drainage along the north side of the street. Submit the area of untreated runoff.
Prior to any work on site the applicant shall obtain city and CWS approval of the complete
design of the stormwater detention facilities and maintenance plans for them, including
maintenance requirements and provisions for any treatments used.
Prior to any work on site,the applicant shall provide documented approval from the
Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) of the design of the proposed water and fire service.
Prior to any work on site,the applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley Fire&
Rescue (TVF&R) for the planned access and hydrant location.
Prior to any ground disturbance on the site,the applicant shall obtain an erosion control permit
issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act. The
plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning
Manual,February 2003 edition (and any subsequent versions or updates)."
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF
A BUILDING PERMIT:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or grcg@tigard-or.gov)
for review and approval:
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain all permits and service provider
letters necessary from all appropriate agencies (such as Washington County, Tualatin Valley
Water Department and Clean Water Services) for all work to be done on site.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain approval from Tualatin Valley
Fire and Rescue.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall demonstrate that the reconstructed
sewer lateral,including portions that are not replaced,met standards.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain city approval of plans for the
construction of the stormwater treatment facilities and a Storm Water Connection
Authorization.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL
INSPECTION:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tigard-or.gov)
for review and approval:
Prior to final inspection, all elements of the proposed infrastructure (such as transportation,
sanitary sewer, storm drainage,water, etc.) shall be in place and operational with accepted
maintenance plans. The developer's engineer shall provide written certification that all
improvements,workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard
engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade,prior to city acceptance of the
development's improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance.
Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall obtain an approved Washington County Facility
Permit for the complete construction of required street improvements.
Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall obtain city and CWS approval of the complete
construction of the stormwater treatment facilities and maintenance plans. (Contact Brian
Wheatley).
Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall provide a final sight distance report.
Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley Fire &
Rescue (TVF&R) for access and hydrant location and any other necessary construction.
Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall submit payment of$5,950 for the fee in-lieu of
relocating utilities underground.
OAK WAY __...
F" ...- > .. —1 !� a VICINITY MAP
X --I JJ :;+•- rr�+Q w , CUP2014-00003
- OAK S T z Japanese International
,, __J , Baptist Church Expansion
�' , W Jr �1 -_I as t 3 t r -.�.�.�_.a_ _
, ., .,3
.-° S" or
2 i _
a -la __3 ..I ,.,3 _.I ....._I .....�.�-t a -..-.a .�+ .� --.1 J .:
PINE ST
a, - ' _ ...J �, ;I_,1 J . ! 1 _ I Lv '.s� -- J_I a _j -.;,
.J If ' y .3
i
JJ .i . _� _.: fr, I _ a ._s j d Subject Site
SPRUCE ST .
1 < i _I ., lamp ■■■n■l
a-..- JOE LL,eg E , rtisaLiAltiii j r -..r+ j -�"r-.a-
�, j IJ 1LUCILLE C 1:2:1 "' j .
i J
_ _ i d } „} -J ::::E.■■■ — -t i tj C1nIti S .f
`—j 1 ■■■■■■■■■ _..r -J. J
■■■■■■■■■ ,,s s:.t r
■■■■■■■■■ --, .a ,_.�
�.. ---' . _ ; o ■■■...... S TE V E ST
.F ,-,+'- - .,.J fi --' ri --1 -Jr ,, -. ;, j Imormation on this nap is for general location
/ -' only and should be verified with the
1 J CCI , 11 m { I ( -+� Development Services Division.
~� -1 •1 r+ -1 ,} w Approx.Scale 1:4,000-1 In=333 It
.� 1 .7
J _ j �,-- 4 < Map partied at 07 13 AM on 26-Nov-14
I ..3 a -Li CL1 ....1 (j
- y� S .—t , _+ F+ ,{{yI DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CM,OF TIGARD
-.A � )YAY t3/t .7 J yy MAKES NO WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE
3 . YL 1 I Et ,Q t ... fri CONTENT ACCURACY.TIMELINESS DR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF
- . _� w /// [ �� -. t �M -^ I THE DATA FRONDED HEREIN.THE CITY OG TOMO SHALL ASSUME NO
' ...JJJ .,a LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS OMISSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE
-A •�I INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED.
j J J "" t Z ji '-, n i —
<* .i
., .� �• �� ...,, N o� City of Tigard
e rL,, 13125 SW Hall Blvd
C Feet cCC "i —�.,,....._„ "� co _-�I 1 J TIGA� flr+ Tiggaard,OR 97223 -
-J - —aJ M 503 6394171 e
-t ...j J r a www.tigardor.gov 7I�SRn
IMINMENI R .... ... .x i
w Ts is N LIMN
Op pp g La
O
PCI
w '4 _1
i—im
W
.LLY[Z N6YE.2T•005 ° 5
1W 30' 30' Dee OC z
d c 4G
I —IwC P§
PI C Geiotl
SITE NSUAL ~q V1 m 836
CRSSWAna Nw N $ .]
SW 85TH AVE R
Eb HC 3 8E,6t 005 i _. c ^8
ci
o ¢ -OR4.1A FC
%E rl RDUR ro
Di I : `5 ;' _FS
Di E �" WEI:AN,.
b I a n -" 3DUNDA0.Y
L l
p
1
I
I .GDbZE 3.TE,bIs00N
CUREMOVE IDEWALXnum •II ON-SRE SIDEWALK AREAS I
&RECONST UCTWITH I v:i )
N RE SpIARUR WITH r. j —4 TOREACRUSHED ROCK
I'OF
5'PIANRR STRIP i j�: LI'-0'CRUSNED ROIX ^ in sr• Jl J_
c
0 : -J ,0
HALF STREET L.
IMPROVEMENT 1 v�l v. I Jdl d i I
.` .. i t i
1 5 I Am
I R r_... _ V Z
r
.9['9ZZ MSL,[Oe00N �. .r '
�T w I � n
/ ti V
ILI ',v'. __ ,,.
` �
SW SPRUCE STREET 1^
STA l.M.00 TOTTA M,A. sw[,r2
E I en
I
N A m PRELIMINARY FOR REVIEW ONLY 14
3R
g
EXHIBIT D
Gary Pagenstecher
From: N M <counselorpdx@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:43 AM
To: Gary Pagenstecher
Subject: Case# CUP2014-00003
Dear Mr. Pagenstecher:
Thanks again for your understanding re: being unable to provide you with written testimony yesterday. Here
is a brief list of some concerns regarding the proposed building at 8500 S.W. Spruce in Tigard:
Buffering and Screening: (Code 18.745.050) There is concern that the church will not adhere to requirements
for fencing and vegetation as set out in these codes.
Graffiti: (Code 6.02.060) This has already been an issue as well as vandalism, according to reports at the first
Building meeting.
Noise: (Code 6.02.430) There is concern amongst neighbors that the Heating/cooling system for this building
will create noise between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., which is not in keeping with the City's
ordinance.
Noxious vegetation: (Code 6.02.020) This is already an issue with the Japanese International Baptist
Church. They do not make any effort to cut back the blackberry bushes, which continue to grow over the
fence of two adjacent properties. With the exception of mowing the grass, they are not good landscaping
stewards.
Parking: (Code 10.32.026) If this building comes to fruition, the neighbors are hopeful that the existing parking
issues will be addressed by the City Engineer. Parishioners are parking at the Nursery adjacent to the church,
as well as obstructing Residential streets.
We are hopeful that that these concerns will be thoughtfully considered by the City with regard to the Church
expansion.
Thanks very much for your time and please feel welcome to contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Naomi B. Mimnaugh, (503) 830-2044
"Success in life, is that your kids want to spend time with you once they've grown up." -P. Orfalca
i
Gary Pagenstecher
From: Gene Davis <fmf.india@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 4:00 PM
To: Gary Pagenstecher
Cc: 'Peter Ladley'
Subject: Affirmative Action
Case ID Number CUP2014-00003
Japenese International Baptist Church
Dear Gary,
We are very much in favor of affirmative action of the Japanese International Baptist
Church expansion by the City of Tigard.
Please approve this application. The Japanese Baptist Church has been very beneficial to
our community. Just their presence has reduced the incidents of crime in our immediate
area. As you probably know, there has been at least 3 fatal killings in homes of residence
within a half mile radius before they came influential. Now our whole community lives
mostly in peace. Everything we do produces good citizenship by our youth, which of
course perculates down to law and order. They care very much about the people in the
community and we appreciate them very much!
Thank you for your consideration.
Dr. Gene and Vivian Davis
10875 SW 89'h Ave
Tigard, OR 97223
Tel: 503 246 5862
Fax: 503 977 9343
t
REQUEST
FOR
COMMENTS
: City of Tigard
TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
DATE: November 10, 2014
TO: PER ATTACHED LIST
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: Agnes Kowacz, Associate Planner
Phone: (503) 718-2427 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email: agneskna.tigard-or.gov
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)2014-00003
-JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION -
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Type IIT-Hearings Officer (HO) Conditional Use Permit to approve the construction of a new
7,000 square foot building to be used for classrooms,a sports court,bathrooms,play area and coffee lounge. The building proposed to be
located at SW 8500 Spruce Street,on the north portion of the lot. The site is bordered by SW Spruce Street to the north and single family
residential development to the south, east and west. The property is currently developed with a single family residence, detached garage,
church buildings,associated parking and landscaping.
LOCATION: The property is located at 8500 SW Spruce Street; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 1S135AD, Lots 04400.
ZONE: R-12: medium-density residential district& R-25: medium high-density residential district.The R-12 zoning district is designed to
accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet.A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also
permitted conditionally. The R-25 zoning district is designed to accommodate existing housing of all types and new attached single-family
and multifamily housing units at a minimum lot size of 1,480 square feet.A limited amount of neighborhood commercial uses is permitted
outright and a wide range of civic and institutional uses are permitted conditionally. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION:
medium high and medium-density residential district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters:
18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390, Procedures; 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts; 18.705, Access Egress
and Circulation; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.745,Landscaping and Screening; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste; 18.765,Off-
Street Parking and Loading;18.790,Urban Forestry;18.795,Visual Clearance; 18.810,Street and Utility Improvement Standards.
Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by various
departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a
decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR
COMMENTS BACK BY: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2014. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate
letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date,please phone the staff contact noted above with your
comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division,
13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
Name&Number of Person(s) Commenting:
CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
OR Parks and Rec Dept State Historic Preservation Office,725 Sumner St NE,Suite C,Salem OR 97301 (Notify if
property has HD overlay)
OR Public Utilities Commission,PO Box 1088,Salem OR 97308-1088
✓ US Army Corps of Engineers,Kathryn Harris,Routing CENWP-OP-G,POB 2946,Portland OR 97208-2946(Maps and
CWS letter only)
Washington County Consolidated Communications Agency(WCCCA) "911",Dave Austin,POB 6375,Beaverton OR
97007-0375 (monopole towers)
Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Naomi Vogel-Beattie, 1400 SW Walnut St MS 51 Hillsboro OR 97123-
y' 5625 (general aPps)*
Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Brent Curtis,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 13,Hillsboro OR 97124
(CPA)*
Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Assessment&Taxation,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 9,Hillsboro OR
97124(ZCA)*
Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Doria Mateja,Cartography,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 14,Hillsboro
OR 97124(ZC-1)*
UTILITY PROVIDERS,SPECIAL DISTRICTS &AGENCIES
Beaverton School District#48,Jennifer Garland,Demographics, 1 G55u S\\ Merlo Rd,Beaverton OR 97006-5152
Century Link,Right-of-Way Department,Qwest Corporation dba Century Link QC,1208 NE 64th St,4th Floor,Seattle
WA 98115
Century Link,Attn: John Pfeifer, 1600 7th Ave,4th Floor,Seattle,WA 98191-0000(proposed and approved Annexation
notices)
Century Link,Karen Stewart,Local Government Affairs Director,310 SW Park Ave,Portland OR 97205 (proposed and
approved Annexation notices)
Clean Water Services,Development Services Department,David Schweitzer/SWM Program,2550 SW Hillsboro Hwy,
Hillsboro OR 97123*
Comcast Cable Corp.,Gerald Backhaus, 14200 SW Brigadoon Court,Beaverton OR 97005(See map for area contact)NO
MAP? ...Joe Patton
Metro Area Communications Commission(MACC),Fred Christ, 15201 NW Greenbrier Parkway,C-1,Beaverton OR
97006-4886(annexations only)
NW Natural Gas Company,Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord.,220 SW Second Ave,Portland OR 97209-3991
NW Natural Gas Company,Account Services, ,-1TTN: Annexation Coordinator 220 SW Second Ave,Portland OR 97209-
3991 (Annexations only)
Portland General Electric,Lorraine Katz,2213 SW 153rd Drive,Beaverton OR 97006
Portland General Electric,Tod l,.Shattuck,2213 SW 153rd Drive,Beaverton OR 97006
Portland Western R/R,Burlington Northern/Sante Fe R/R,Oregon Electric R/R,(Burlington,Northern/Sante Fe R/R
predecessor),Bruce Carswell,President and GM,200 Hawthorne Ave SE,Suite C320,Salem OR 97301-5294
Union Pacific Railroad,Director of Public Affairs,301 NE 2nd Ave,Portland OR 97232(currently the PA Dir is Brock
Nelson,503-249-3079)
✓ Tigard/Tualatin School District#23J,Teri Brady,Administrative Offices,6960 SW Sandburg St,Tigard OR 97223-8039
Tigard Water District,POB 230281,Portland OR 97281-0281
Tualatin Hills Parks and Rec District,Planning Mgr,15707 SW Walker Rd,Beaverton OR 97006*
Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue,John Wolff,DeputyFire Marshall, 11945 SW 70th Ave,Tigard OR 97223-9196*
1/ Tualatin Valley Water District,Administrative Office,1850 SW 170th Ave,Beaverton OR 97006*
Tri-Met Transit Development,Ben Baldwin,Project Planner,1800 SW 1st Ave#300,Portland,OR 97201 (If project is
within 1/4 mile of a transit route)
Verizon,John Cousineau,OSP Network,4155 SW Cedar Hills Blvd,Beaverton OR 97005
*Indicates automatic notification in compliance with intergovernmental agreement if within 500' of the subject property for
any/all city projects(Project Planner is Responsible for Indicating Parties to Notify)
This document is password protected. Please sec Joe or Doreen if you need updates to it or the the corresponding mailing labels at
I/CURPLN/Request for Comments Notification Labels.Thank you.
I/CURPLNIMASTERS/REQ FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST(UPDATED 10114/14) Page 2 of 2
CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
NOTTFTC \TION LIST FOR LAND USE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
FILE,NOS: FILE NAME:
Cup2oI+ 00003 TI e C
✓ Place a checkmark in the block to the left of the name of each person or organization that needs to be notified.
CITY OFFICES
C.D.Administration/Kenny Asher,CD Director
C.D.Administration/Tom McGuire,Asst CD Director
City Administration/Carol Krager,City Recorder
Development Services/Planning-Engineering Techs.
r/ Development Services/Development Eng. Greg Berry(Copy on all Notices of Decision)
Building Division/Mark VanDomelen,Building Official
t/ Police Department/Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer(Copy on all Notices of Decision)
1/ Public Works/John Goodrich,Interim Asst PW Director
Public Works/Karleen Aichele,Engineer Tech 1
Hearings Officer(2 sets)
Planning Commission(12 sets)
City Attorney
File/Reference (2 sets)
LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS
City of Beaverton,Planning Manager,POB 4755,Beaverton OR 97076*
City of Beaverton,Steven Sparks,Dev Svcs Mgr,POB 4755,Beaverton OR 97076*
City of Durham City Manager,17160 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd,Durham OR 97224*
City of King City City Manager, 15300 SW 116th Ave,King City OR 97224*
City of Lake Oswego,Planning Director,POB 369,Lake Oswego OR 97034*
City of Portland,Planning Bureau Director,1900 SW 4th Ave,Suite 4100,Portland OR 97201
City of Tualatin Planning Manager,18880 SW Martinazzi Ave,Tualatin OR 97062*
Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,Joanna Mensher,Data Resource Center
(7.CA-Adopted)*
Icreo-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,Paulette Copperstone, (ZCA-RFC Only)*
Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,O.Gerald Uba,PhD,
(CPA/DCA/ZON)*
ODOT,Rail Division,Dave Lanning,Sr.Crossing Safety Specialist,555 13th Street NE,Suite 3,Salem OR 97301-4179
(Notify if ODOT R/R-Hwy Crossing is only access to land)
ODOT,Region 1 -Development Review Coordinator Carl Torland,Right-of-Way Section,123 NE Flanders,Portland OR
97209-4037(Vacations)*
ODOT Region 1 Development Review Program,123 NW Flanders St,Portland OR 97209
OR Dept of Energy,Bonneville Power Administration,Routing 1TRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera,POB 3621,Portland OR
97208-3621 (powerlines in area)
OR Dept of Aviation,Tom Highland,Planning,3040 25th Street,SE,Salem OR 97310(monopole towers)
OR Dept of Environmental Quality(DEQ),Regional Administrator,2020 SW Fourth Ave,Suite 400,Portland OR 97201-
4987
OR Dept of Fish&Wildlife,Elizabeth Anther,Habitat Biologist,North Willamette Watershed District,18330 NW Sauvie
Island Road,Portland OR 97231
OR Dept of Geo.&Mineral Ind.,800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 965,Portland OR 97232
OR Dept of Land Conservation&Dev.,Mara Ulloa,635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150,Salem OR 9/301-2540(Comp Plan
Amendments&Measure 37)-Per 11/18/13 email from John Floyd-you have the option to send email copies See
DLCD website for online submittal procedures
OR Division of State Lands,Melinda Wood(WLUN Form Required),775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100,Salem OR 97301-
1279 Per 08/07/13 email from Cheryl Caines-docs should be emailed/do not send hard copies
IICURPLN/MASTERS/REO FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST(UPDATED 10/14/14) Page 1 of 2
li
E . City of Tigard
TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
DA 1'E: November 10. 2014
TO: TVF&R
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: Agnes Kowacz.Associate Planner
Phone: (503) 718-2427 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email: agnesk(aitigard-or.gov
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)2014-00003
-JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION -
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Type III-Hearings Officer (HO) Conditional Use Permit to approve the construction of a new
7,000 square foot building to be used for classrooms, a sports court,bathrooms,play area and coffee lounge. The building proposed to be
located at SW 8500 Spruce Street, on the north portion of the lot. The site is bordered by SW Spruce Street to the north and single family
residential development to the south, east and west. The property is currently developed with a single family residence, detached garage,
church buildings,associated parking and landscaping.
LOCATION: The property is located at 8500 SW Spruce Street; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 1S135AD, Lots 04400.
ZONE: R-12: medium-density residential district& R-25: medium high-density residential district.The R-12 zoning district is designed to
accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet.A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also
permitted conditionally. The R-25 zoning district is designed to accommodate existing housing of all types and new attached single-family
and multifamily housing units at a minimum lot size of 1,480 square feet.A limited amount of neighborhood commercial uses is permitted
outright and a wide range of civic and institutional uses are permitted conditionally. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION:
medium high and medium-density resident - ._ - ---- ---_-_ ----"" ^" ^ pity Development Code Chapters:
18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Devel g Districts; 18.705,Access Egress
and Circulation; 18.725,Environmental Pen John Wolff IAAI-CFI �,Mixed Solid Waste; 18.765,Off-
Street Parking and Loading;18.790,Urban F Deputy Fire Marshal II ovement Standards.
Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity May (503)259-1504-direct i information supplied by various
departments and agencies and from othr (503)642-4814-fax Lendation will be prepared and a
decision will be rendered on the propos Tualatin Valley (503)649-8577-main Ipplication, WE NEED YOUR
COMMENTS BACK BY: WEDNESI Fire & Rescue John.Wolff@tvfr.com ?vided below or attach a separate
letter to return your comments. If you ar 11945 S.W.70th Avenue Iff contact noted above with your
comments and confirm your comments it Tigard,OR 97223-9196 tact the Tigard Planning Division,
ga
13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97 wwr tvfi cAm
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWINv a i nivia 1 Fitt r nr r,.,i: I
XL We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
_ Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
TUAI ATIN VAI I EV FIRE&RESCUE
J
APPROVED
CONDITIONALLY APPROVED
Name&Number of Person(s) Commenting: - _ _..17
APf ROVAL OF PLANS IS Nut AN APPROVAL OF
OMISSIONS OR OVERSIGHTS.
SEEQTTfC LETTER fT
�. 61112&1,41
U4NS EXA E 4DATE
V
Alilik
WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON
Department of Land Use and Transportation,Operations&Maintenance Division
(51400)SW 23 Walnut Street,M Hillsboro,Oregon 97123-5625
(503)846-7623•FAX:(503)846-7620
November 26, 2014
Agnes Kowacz —Associate Planner
City of Tigard Planning Division
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
No. of pages: 4
RE: Japanese International Baptist Church Expansion
City File Number: (CUP) 2014-0003
County File Number: CD-42/CP-43
Tax Map and Lot Number: 1S1-36CB 04400
Location: 8500 SW Spruce Street
,. � 1, : s .
r f1-" •
1: :
f '!:.rat' i'ii► 1 1 ..` Tie
'7 ; Jr, iErii+.,
Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation has reviewed this
development application and submits the following comments and required conditions for
access to SW Spruce Street, a County-maintained Local street.
NOTE: A pre-existing driveway which is part of a redeveloping site is subject to County review and
conditions for access approval.
1. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing access on SW Spruce Street. The
applicant has indicated that the proposal will generate an additional 16 ADT's on
Tuesday, Thursday and Friday during the hours of 9AM to 2PM. Staff notes
additional trips beyond the ADT's indicated above may require additional traffic
analysis. Any reconstruction of the access will be required to meet County road
standards. Additionally, the applicant will be required to provide certification from
City Casefile(CUP)2014-0003
Page 1 of 4
a registered professional engineer that adequate sight distance exists in both
directions (or can be obtained pursuant to specific improvements) at the site's
access to SW Spruce Street prior to issuance of a building permit.
2. Consistent with statewide pedestrian circulation/linkage goals of the Transportation
Planning Rule and the County's R&O 86-95 (road safety requirements), the County
normally requires sidewalk installation as a minimum road safety improvement along site
frontage of all County-maintained roads. Sidewalks further establish future street profiles,
demarcate County or City right-of-way, and address drainage issues. Sidewalk
requirements are not generally waived, even when sidewalk is not currently present on
neighboring properties. Rather, even non-contiguous sidewalk is considered to provide
some measure of pedestrian refuge and ideally, makes possible eventual connection of
sidewalks (as surrounding development takes place and is likewise conditioned to
provide sidewalk). Additionally, the Washington County Road Design and Construction
Standards require provision of adequate drainage along a site's frontage of a county
road.
Sidewalk and drainage exist along the site's frontage of SW Spruce Street The
applicant is proposing to reconstruct the existing sidewalk, gutter and pavement
along the subject site's frontage. Staff notes the existing access approach is
significantly damaged and should be reconstructed. All public improvements
within County right-of-way shall be constructed to County road standards.
REQUIRED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
IMPORTANT:
Road improvements required along site frontage shall apply to frontage of all land within the subject site that
abuts the County roadway. The subject site shall be considered to include: any lot or parcel to be
partitioned or otherwise subdivided (regardless of whether it contains existing structures or not);and any
contiguous lots or parcels that constitute phases of the currently proposed development.
Refer to the following link to access Washington County Road Design and Construction Standards:
Lfipliwww.co.washinaton.or.us/LUT/Divisions/Enaineennq/ConsultantResourcesfroad-design-standards.cfm
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT BY THE CITY OF
TIGARD:
A. Submit to Washington County Public Assurance Staff, 503-846-3843:
1. Completed "Design Option" form.
2. $3750.00 Administration Deposit.
NOTE: The Administration Deposit is a cost-recovery account used to pay for County services
provided to the developer, including plan review and approval, field inspections, as-built approval,
and project administration. The Administration Deposit amount noted above is an estimate of
what it will cost to provide these services. if, during the course of the project, the Administration
City Casefile(CUP)2014-0003
Page 2 of 4
Deposit account is running low, additional funds will be requested to cover the estimated time left
on the project(at then-current rates per the adopted Washington County Fee Schedule). if there
am any unspent funds at project close out, they will be refunded to the applicant. Any point of
contact with County staff can be a chargeable cost. If protect plans are not complete or do not
comply with County standards and codes, costs will be higher. There is a charge to cover the cost
of every field inspection. Costs for enforcement actions will also be charged to the applicant.
3. A copy of the City's Land Use Approval with Conditions, signed and dated.
4. Preliminary certification of adequate sight distance for the existing access
point to SW Spruce Street, in accordance with County Code, prepared and
stamped by a registered professional engineer, as well as:
a. A detailed list of improvements necessary to produce adequate
intersection sight distance (refer to the following webpage for sight
distance certification submittal requirements).
http:I/www.co.wa shin Qton.or.us/LUT/Divisions/C urrentPlanninq/developme nt-application-forms_cfm
5. Three (3) sets of complete engineering plans for construction of the
following public improvements:
a. Reconstruction of the existing half-street improvement along the
site's frontage of SW Spruce Street to County standards.
b. Reconstruction of the existing access to SW Spruce Street to
County standards.
c. Improvements within the right-of-way as necessary to provide
adequate intersection sight distance at the existing access to SW
Spruce Street, if required.
NOTE: The access shall meet sight distance prior to the commencement of
construction activities on the site.
B. Obtain a Washington County Facility Permit upon completion of the following:
1. Obtain Engineering Division approval and provide a financial assurance for
the construction of the public improvements listed in conditions I.A.5.
NOTE: The Public Assurance staff(503-846-3843) will send the required forms to the applicant's
representative after submittal and approval of items listed under l.A.
The Facility Permit allows construction work within County rights-of-way and permits site access
only after the developer first submits plans and obtains Washington County Engineering approval,
obtains required grading and erosion control permits, and satisfies various other requirements of
Washington County's Assurances Section including but not limited to execution of financial and
contractual agreements. This process ensures that the developer accepts responsibility for
construction of public improvements, and that improvements are closely monitored, inspected,
and built to standard in a timely manner. Access will only be permitted under the required
Washington County Facility Permit, and only following submittal and County acceptance of
all materials required under the facility permit process.
City Casefile(CUP)2014-0003
Page 3 of 4
II. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY:
Obtain a Finaled Washington County Facility Permit, contingent upon the following:
A. The road improvements required in condition I.A.5. above shall be completed and
accepted by Washington County.
Requirements identified within this letter are considered by the County to be minimum
warranted improvements (and/or analyses) that are necessitated by the proposed
development, therefore it is requested that they be conveyed to the applicant within the City's
Approval document. Please send a copy of the subsequent Final City Notice of Decision and
any appeal information to the County.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please contact me
at 503-846-7639.
Naomi oge
Associate Planner
Cc: Road Engineering Services Section
Paul Seitz,Assurances Section
Transportation File
City Case file(CUP)2014-0003
Page 4 of 4
CleanWater Services
MEMORANDUM
Date: November 20,2014
To: Agnes Kowacz,Associate P er, City of Tigard
From: Jackie Sue Humphreys lean Water Services(the District)
Subject: Japanese International Baptist Church Expansion, CUP 2014-00003, 1 S136CB04400
Please include the following comments when writing your conditions of approval:
PRIOR TO ANY WORK ON THE SITE
A Clean Water Services (the District) Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization must be
obtained prior to plat approval and recordation. Application for the District's Permit
Authorization must be in accordance with the requirements of the Design and Construction
Standards,Resolution and Order No. 07-20, (or current R&O in effect at time of Engineering
plan submittal),and is to include:
a. Detailed plans prepared in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 2.04.2.b-1.
b. Detailed grading and erosion control plan. An Erosion Control Permit will be required.
Area of Disturbance must be clearly identified on submitted construction plans.
c. Detailed plans showing the development having direct access by gravity to public storm
and sanitary sewer.
d. Provisions for water quality in accordance with the requirements of the above named
design standards. Water Quality is required for all new development and redevelopment
areas per R&O 07-20, Section 4.05.5, Table 4-1. Access shall be provided for
maintenance of facility per R&O 07-20, Section 4.02.4.
e. If use of an existing, offsite or regional Water Quality Facility is proposed, it must be
clearly identified on plans, showing its location, condition, capacity to treat this site and,
any additional improvements and/or upgrades that may be needed to utilize that facility.
2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123
Phone: (503)681-3600 • Fax: (503)681-3603 • cleanwaterservices.org
i
f. If private lot LIDA systems proposed, must comply with the current CWS Design and
Construction Standards. A private maintenance agreement, for the proposed private lot
LIDA systems, needs to be provided to the City for review and acceptance.
g. Show all existing and proposed easements on plans. Any required storm sewer, sanitary
sewer, and water quality related easements must be granted to the City.
h. Site contains a"Sensitive Area." Applicant shall comply with the conditions as set forth
in the Service Provider Letter No. 14-002134, dated August 29, 2014.
i. Clean Water Services shall require an easement over the Vegetated Corridor conveying
storm and surface water management to Clean Water Services that would prevent the
owner of the Vegetated Corridor from activities and uses inconsistent with the purpose of
the corridor and any easements therein.
j. Detailed plans showing the sensitive area and corridor delineated, along with restoration
and enhancement of the corridor.
k. Provide DSL and Corps of Engineers permits for any work in the wetlands or creek prior
to any on site work, including grading and erosion control. Include permit number on
cover sheet of plans or provide concurrence with the delineation.
1. Any proposed offsite construction activities will require an update or amendment to the
current Service Provider Letter for this project.
CONCLUSION
This Land Use Review does not constitute the District's approval of storm or sanitary sewer
compliance to the NPDES permit held by the District. The District,prior to issuance of any
connection permits, must approve final construction plans and drainage calculations.
Agnes Kowacz
From: Cousineau, John <John.Cousineau@ftr.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 9:46 AM
To: Agnes Kowacz
Subject: Japanese International Baptist Church Expansion
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
This property is right on the Century Link and Frontier boundary. This is in Century Link
territory though.
John Cousineau
Network Engineer, Network Engineering & Planning
Frontier Communications
4155 SW Cedar Hills Blvd.
Beaverton, OR. 97055
503-643-0371(o)
971-708-2412(c)
503-643-0977(f)
john.cousineau@ftr.com
am,37a nth ;
"I Can Help You"
1
RECEIVED
NOV 12 2014
TUALATIN VALLEY s City of Tigard WATER DISTRICT
TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
DA 1'E: November 10,2014
TO: TVWD
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: Agnes Kowacz,Associate Planner
Phone: (503) 718-2427 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email: agnesk@tigard-or.gov
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2014-00003
-JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION -
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Type 111-Hearings Officer (HO) Conditional Use Permit to approve the construction of a new
7,000 square foot building to be used for classrooms,a sports court,bathrooms,play area and coffee lounge. The building proposed to be
located at SW 8500 Spruce Street,on the north portion of the lot. The site is bordered by SW Spruce Street to the north and single family
residential development to the south, east and west. The property is currently developed with a single family residence, detached garage,
church buildings,associated parking and landscaping.
LOCATION: The property is located at 8500 SW Spruce Street; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 1S135AD, Lots 04400.
ZONE: R-12: medium-density residential district&R-25: medium high-density residential district. The R-12 zoning district is designed to
accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet.A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also
permitted conditionally. The R-25 zoning district is designed to accommodate existing housing of all types and new attached single-family
and multifamily housing units at a minimum lot size of 1,480 square feet.A limited amount of neighborhood commercial uses is permitted
outright and a wide range of civic and institutional uses are permitted conditionally. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION:
medium high and medium-density residential district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters:
18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390, Procedures; 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts; 18.705, Access Egress
and Circulation; 18.725,Environmental Performance Standards; 18.745,Landscaping and Screening; 18.755,Mixed Solid Waste; 18.765,Off-
Street Parking and Loading;18.790,Urban Forestry;18.795,Visual Clearance;18.810,Street and Utility Improvement Standards.
Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by various
departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a
decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR
COMMENTS BACK BY: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2014. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate
letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date,please phone the staff contact noted above with your
comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division,
13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
/ .. We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
—
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
—
Written comments provided below:
—
IName&Number of Person(s) Commenting: jZ‘m_,.li °a,/,,,,z-rW (c75-) q -3,9
V
_.
111111
4 MI City of Tigard
TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
DATE: November 10,2014
TO: POLICE
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division
STAFF CONTACT: Agnes Kowacz,Associate Planner
Phone: (503) 718-2427 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email: agneskQtigard-or.gov
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2014-00003
-JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH EXPANSION -
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Type III-Hearings Officer (HO) Conditional Use Permit to approve the construction of a new
7,000 square foot building to be used for classrooms,a sports court, bathrooms,play area and coffee lounge. The building proposed to be
located at SW 8500 Spruce Street, on the north portion of the lot. The site is bordered by SW Spruce Street to the north and single family
residential development to the south, east and west. The property is currently developed with a single family residence, detached garage,
church buildings,associated parking and landscaping.
LOCATION: The property is located at 8500 SW Spruce Street; Washington County Tax Assessor's Map 1S135AD, Lots 04400.
ZONE: R-12: medium-density residential district& R-25: medium high-density residential district. The R-12 zoning district is designed to
accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also
permitted conditionally. The R-25 zoning district is designed to accommodate existing housing of all types and new attached single-family
and multifamily housing units at a minimum lot size of 1,480 square feet. A limited amount of neighborhood commercial uses is permitted
outright and a wide range of civic and institutional uses are permitted conditionally. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION:
medium high and medium-density residential district. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters:
18.330, Conditional Use; 18.360, Site Development Review; 18.390, Procedures; 18.510, Residential Zoning Districts; 18.705,Access Egress
and Circulation; 18.725, Environmental Performance Standards; 18.745,Landscaping and Screening; 18.755, Mixed Solid Waste; 18.765, Off-
Street Parking and Loading;18.790,Urban Forestry; 18.795,Visual Clearance; 18.810,Street and Utility Improvement Standards.
Attached are the Site Plan,Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by various
departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a
decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR
COMMENTS BACK BY: WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2014. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate
letter to return your comments. If you arc unable to respond by the above date,please phone the staff contact noted above with your
comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division,
13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223.
PI,�ASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
_� We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
—
Please contact of our office.
—
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
Name&Number of Person(s) Commenting: U iM NW' 50 )- -11 _1'5 VJ\
Outlookcom-counselorpdx@hotmail.com https://bay180.mail.live.com/?page=Compose
Send Insert Save draft Options Cancel N M
111 NM
Case # CUP2014-00003 Saving...
counselorpdx@hotmail.com
To Cc ecc B I A. A° 6 L ,c •_ _• •? _ _ = se
garyp®tigard-or.gov
Dear Mr.Pagenstecher:
Here is a brief list of some concerns regarding the proposed building at 8500 S.W.Spruce in
Tigard:
Buffering and Screening:(Code 18.745.050)There is concern that the church will not adhere
to requirements for fencing and vegetation as set out in these codes.
Graffiti:(Code 6.02.060) This has already been an issue as well as vandalism,according to
reports at the first Building meeting.
Noise:(Code 6.02.430) There is concern amongst neighbors that the Heating/cooling system
for this building will create noise between the hours of 10:00 p.m.and 7:00 a.m.,which is not
in keeping with the City's ordinance.
Noxious vegetation:(Code 6.02.020) This is already an issue with the Japanese International
Baptist Church. They do not make any effort to cut back the blackberry bushes,which
continue to grow over the fence of two adjacent properties. With the exception of mowing
the grass,they are not good landscaping stewards.
Parking:(Code 10.32.026) If this building comes to fruition,the neighbors are hopeful that
the existing parking issues will be addressed by the City Engineer. Parishioners are parking at
the Nursery adjacent to the church,as well as obstructing Residential streets.
We are hopeful that that these concerns will be thoughtfully considered by the City with
regard to the Church expansion.
Thanks very much for your time and please feel welcome to contact me if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
Naomi B.Mimnaugh,(503)830-2044
"Success in life,is that your kids want to spend time with you once they've grown up."-P.
Orfalea
"6h„aesL. yocs.- 4 Happy Hol.d,y5
823" f Ste. Jaelie cJ-
Tr6Hsu, c 77Z2-3
®2014 Microsoft Terms Privacy&cookies Developers English(United States)
v
1 of 1 12/10/2014 11:40 AM
MAILING /
NOTIFICATION
RECORDS
r
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
TIGARD
I, Gary Pagenstecher,being first duly sworn/affirm,on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of
Tigard,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following:
{Check Appropriate Box(s)Below}
® NOTICE OF Final Decision FOR: CUP2014-00003
Japanese International Baptist Church
❑ AMENDED NOTICE—
❑ City of Tigard Community Development Director's Designee
® Tigard Hearings Officer
❑ Tigard Planning Commission
❑ Tigard City Council
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to
each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part
hereof,January 7,2015,and deposited in nited States Mail on January 7,2015 ,postage prepaid.
ary P genstecher
01•110111101,0--
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss.
City of Tigard )
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the (2 day of J a Au Coe y ,21115.
�f"�Rx. OFFICIAL STAMP
BETSY GAUCIA
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON
47)414
�D COMMISSION N0.925741MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 09,2018
NOTARY PIC OF OREGON
My Commission Expires: 3/9 114
I:\CDADM\Sr Administrative Specialist\Affidavits\2015\Affidavit of Mailing_Notice of Final Decision_CUP201400003_Gary 01 07 15.docx
1,1 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING •
TIGARD
I, Gary Pagenstecher,being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of
Tigard,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following:
(Check Appropriate Box(s)Below}
® NOTICE OF Final Decision FOR: CUP2014-00003
Japanese International Baptist Church
❑ AMENDED NOTICE—
❑ City of Tigard Community Development Director's Designee
® Tigard Hearings Officer
❑ Tigard Planning Commission
❑ Tigard City Council
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to
each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part
hereof,January 7,2015,and deposited in the United States Mail on January 7,2015 ,postage prepaid.
Gary Pagenstecher
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss.
City of Tigard )
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of , ?l l 15.
NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON
My Commission Expires:
1:\CDADM\Sr Administrative Specialist\Affidavits\2015\Affidavit of Mailing_Notice of Final I)ecision_CUP201400003_Gary 01 0715.docx
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
TIGARD
I,Gary Pagenstecher,being first duly sworn/affirm,on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of
Tigard,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following:
{Check Appropriate Box(s)Below}
® NOTICE OF Final Decision FOR: CUP2014-00003
Japanese International Baptist Church
❑ AMENDED NOTICE—
❑ City of Tigard Community Development Director's Designee
® Tigard Hearings Officer
❑ Tigard Planning Commission
❑ Tigard City Council
A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit ttA", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to
each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part
hereof,January 7,201 deposited in United States Mail on January 7,2015 ,postage prepaid.
G Pagenstecher
STATE OF OREGON ) akin-
County of Washington ) ss.
City of Tigard ) r ( ` Y f d
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of
•
NOTARY P LIC OF OREGON
My Commission Expires:
I:\CDADM\Sr Administrative Specialist\Affidavits\2015\Affidavit of MailingNotice of Final Decision_CUP2014-00003Gary 01 07 15.docx
120 DAYS = 2/7/2015 ExHlalrq
DATE OF FILING: 12/30/2014
DATE MAILED: 1/7/2015
CITY OF TIGARD TIGARD
Washington County, Oregon
NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER
Case Number: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2014-00003
Case Name: LAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH
Applicant's Name/Address: Tapanese International Baptist Church 85_00 SW Spruce Street Tigard OR 97224
Owner's Name/Address: Ta ese International Baniist Church 8500 SW Spruce Street Tigard OR 97224
Address of Property: 8500 SW S42ru.cettreet Tigard_ OR 9722a
Tax Map/Lot Nos.: Washington Co—Tax Assessor_'_s_Man No, LS136CB TaxLot 04400
A FINAL ORDER INCORPORATING THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE THE CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER HAS REVIEWED THE APPLICANT'S PLANS,
NARRATIVE,MATERIALS, COMMENTS OF REVIEWING AGENCIES,THE PLANNING DIVISIONS STAFF REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION DESCRIBED IN FURTHER DETAIL IN THE STAFF REPORT.
THE HEARINGS OFFICER HELD A PUBLIC HEARING ON December 22, 2014 TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY
REGARDING THIS APPLICATION. THIS DECISION HAS BEEN BASED ON THE FACTS, FINDINGS AND
CONCLUSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FINAL ORDER.
Request> The applicant is requesting approval of a major modification to a conditional use permit for the
construction of a 7,000 square foot accessory building to the existing church. The proposed new building will be used
for classrooms, recreation and other various church related functions. The building is proposed to be sited near the
front of the property,where the dwelling and playground were located. Access to the site will continue to be from SW
Spruce Street at the existing church driveway. At the December 22, 2014 public hearing, the Hearings Officer
approved this request, subject to conditions of approval contained within this final order.
Zone: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District; and R-25: Medium High-Density Residential District. Applicable
Review Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.360, 18.390, 18.510, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745,
18.755, 18.765, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810.
Action:> 0 Approval as Requested X Approval with Conditions 0 Denial
Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to:
X Owners of Record within the Required Distance X Affected Government Agencies
X Interested Parties X The Applicants and Owners
The adopted findings of fact and decision can be obtained from the Planning Division/Community Development
Department at the City of Tigard Permit Center at City Hall.
Final Decision:
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 7,2015 AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE ON JANUARY 28. 2015 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED
Appeal:
The decision of the Review Authority is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with
standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2.
of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee
shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The
appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall
Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223.
THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS 5:00 PM ON JANUARY 27,2015.
Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171
BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
Regarding an application by the Japanese International ) F I N A L O R D E R
Baptist Church for approval of a Conditional Use Permit ) CUP 2014-00003
to construct an accessory building on a 3.06-acre parcel ) (Japanese International
at 8500 SW Spruce Street, in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) Baptist Church)
A. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The applicant, Japanese International Baptist Church, requests approval of a
Conditional Use Permit to construct a 7,000 square foot accessory building on a 3.06-acre
parcel located at 8500 SW Spruce Street; also known as Washington County tax map
IS!36CB, Lot 04400 (the "site"). The site contains the existing Japanese International
Baptist Church and associated parking lot on the eastern portion and and two single-
family residences and accessory structures on the western portion. The applicant will
remove the residences and accessory structures to accommodate the proposed
development. The proposed accessory building will house a classrooms and a half-court
gymnasium that will serve the existing church. The northwest corner of the site is zoned
R-25 (medium high-density residential district, 25 units per acre). The remainder of the
site and abutting properties to the east, west and south are zoned R-12 (medium-density
residential district, 12 units per acre). The property abutting the southeast corner of the
site is zoned PR(Parks and Recreation). Properties to the north are in unincorporated
Washington County. Additional basic facts about the site and surrounding land and
applicable approval standards are provided in the Staff Report to the Hearings Officer
dated December 15, 2014 (the "Staff Report"), incorporated herein by reference.
2. Tigard Hearings Officer Joe Turner(the "hearings officer")held a duly noticed
public hearing on December 22, 2014 to receive and consider public testimony in this
matter. All exhibits and records of testimony are filed with the Tigard Department of
Community Development. At the beginning of the hearing, the hearings officer made the
declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer disclaimed any ex parte
contacts, bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary by the hearings officer
of selected relevant testimony offered at the hearing.
3. Tigard Hearings Officer Joe Turner(the "hearings officer")conducted a duly
noticed public hearing to receive testimony and evidence in this matter. At the public
hearing, City staff recommended approval of the application, subject to conditions of
approval in the Staff Report. Representatives of the applicant testified in support of the
application. Two persons testified orally and one person testified in writing with
questions about the application. One person testified in writing in support of the
application. Disputed issues in this case include:
a. Whether the proposed development will cause or exacerbate flooding on
adjacent properties;
b. Whether the proposed development will cause excessive noise impacts;
c. Whether lighting on the site will cast glare on adjacent properties;
d. Whether the proposed development will cause excessive parking
impacts on the surrounding neighborhood;
e. Whether the proposed development will encourage graffiti; and
f. Whether the applicant can and will maintain vegetation the site in
compliance with City Codes.
4. Based on the findings and discussion provided or incorporated in this final
order, the hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that
the proposed development does or will comply with the applicable criteria of the
Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision
complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval
warranted to ensure such compliance occurs in fact. Therefore the application should be
approved subject to such conditions.
B. HEARING AND RECORD
1. The hearings officer received testimony at the public hearing about this
application on December 22, 2014. All exhibits and records of testimony are filed with
the Tigard Department of Community Development. At the beginning of the hearing, the
hearings officer made the declaration required by ORS 197.763. The hearings officer
disclaimed any ex parte contacts, bias or conflicts of interest. The following is a summary
by the hearings officer of selected testimony offered at the public hearing in this matter.
2. City planner Gary Pagenstacher summarized the Staff Report and the proposed
development.
a. He noted that the proposed building is subject to the setback
requirements for conditional uses, which require 25-foot front and 20-foot side yard
setbacks. The applicable zoning districts require 15-foot to 20-foot front and 10-foot to
15-foot side yard setbacks, depending on whether single- or multi-family dwellings are
proposed.
b. The Code does not require buffers along the boundaries of the site.
However the applicant proposed to provide a landscaped buffer between the proposed
building and the adjacent single-family residence west of the site.
CUP 2014-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Japanese International Baptist Church) Page 2
c. The proposed development will have no impact on the Significant
Natural Resource area south of the site.
3. Tony Weller and Kenji Yokoi testified for the applicant.
a. Mr. Weller testified that the applicant will remove the existing single-
family residences and garage on the site to accommodate the proposed accessory
building. The applicant will replace the existing driveway serving the residence with curb
and sidewalk and construct new half-width street improvements along the site's frontage
on SW Spruce Street. The applicant will construct an ADA ramp to facilitate access
between the proposed accessory building and the existing church. The applicant will plant
additional trees within the existing church parking lot as required by the City's urban
forestry standards. No other changes are proposed to the existing parking lot and
driveway. The applicant will collect stormwater runoff from all new impervious surfaces
on the site and convey it to an on-site stormwater pond for treatment and detention. The
applicant will discharge treated stormwater into the vegetated corridor on the south end of
the site at less than predevelopment rates.
i. The site slopes downhill to the south. Therefore stormwater
runoff from the site flows onto adjacent properties under existing conditions. The
proposed development will intercept some of that runoff and divert it to the stormwater
pond and then into the vegetated corridor, potentially reducing the amount of stormwater
flowing onto adjacent properties.
ii. The applicant will design, install and shield outdoor lights on
the site to limit offsite glare. The majority of outdoor lighting will be on the north and
east faces of the building. No new parking lot lights are proposed. One light is proposed
above the door to the gymnasium on the west wall of the building.
iii. The proposed building is located and designed to limit offsite
impacts. Windows in the gymnasium portion are located near the roof and the building is
fully enclosed. The applicant will plant a variety of trees, shrubs and groundcovers
between the west wall of the proposed building and the boundary of the site to screen and
buffer the structure from adjacent residential properties. The stormwater pond will also be
heavily landscaped. The proposed building will be setback 20 feet from the western
boundary of the site.
b. Mr. Yokoi testified that the church wants to have a positive impact on
the community. The proposed building will be setback from adjacent properties and the
setback areas will be landscaped to buffer adjacent properties. The accessory building
will primarily be used during the daytime. He agreed to a condition of approval
prohibiting use of the gymnasium between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in order to limit
potential noise impacts. The church will work with neighbors to mitigate any unforeseen
CUP 2014-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Japanese International Baptist Church) Page 3
impacts that may occur. The church plans to replace the existing fence between the site
and the Mimnaughs' property.
4. Eric Nichols testified that water appears to accumulate in the crawispace below
his house under existing conditions. He expressed concerns that the proposed stormwater
pond will exacerbate this problem.
5. Jeff Mimnaugh questioned who will be responsible if the proposed stormwater
facility fails and causes flooding on adjacent properties. He expressed concerns with
potential lighting and noise impacts on adjacent properties.
6. The hearings officer closed the record at the end of the hearing and announced
his intention to approve the application subject to conditions.
C. DISCUSSION
1. City staff recommended that the hearings officer approve the application, based
on the affirmative findings and subject to conditions of approval in the Staff Report. The
applicant accepted those findings and conditions without exceptions. The hearings officer
adopts the findings and conclusions in the Staff Report as his own except to the extent
they are inconsistent with the findings and discussion in this final order.
2. Concerns were expressed with existing runoff and stormwater ponding
problems in the area. The applicant is not required to remedy all existing and perceived
problems. The Code only prohibits the applicant from making things worse. However the
hearings officer finds that the proposed development will not increase the overall volume
of runoff flowing onto adjacent properties. To the contrary, the proposed development is
likely to reduce the overall volume of stormwater runoff flowing onto adjacent properties.
As Mr. Weller testified, stormwater falling on this site flows downhill to the south, onto
the adjoining properties, under existing conditions. The proposed development will
intercept some of that existing runoff and convey it to a stormwater facility south of the
proposed building for treatment and detention. The applicant will discharge the treated
stormwater to the wetlands on the south end of the site. The proposed stormwater
facilities will capture some portion of the runoff that would otherwise flow onto adjacent
properties and divert it to the stormwater facility, reducing the total area of the site that
drains towards adjacent properties. The stormwater facility is unlikely to fail. A
professional engineer will design the facility considering the expected volume of runoff
from the site, the soil types on the site, and other factors. City engineering staff will
review the design to ensure it complies with accepted requirements for such facilities.
3. The hearings officer finds that the proposed development will not cause
excessive noise impacts on adjacent properties. The majority of activities on the site will
occur within the fully enclosed building. The building will be setback 25 feet or more
from abutting properties. The applicant will provide dense landscaping between the
CUP 2014-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Japanese International Baptist Church) Page 4
building and abutting residential properties to the west. In addition, activities on the site
are subject to the noise limits of section 6.02.430.A Tigard Municipal Code (the"TMC"),
which provides the following limitations on noise:
a. Noise, measured at the boundary of residential properties, in excess of
40 dB at any time between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. the following day;
b. Noise, measured at the boundary of residential properties, in excess of
50 dB at any time between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. the following day;
c.Noise that is plainly audible at any time between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. the
following day within a noise-sensitive unit which is not the source of sound; and
d. Noise that is unnecessarily loud within a noise- sensitive unit which is
not the source of the sound.
Activities on the site are subject to these noise limitations. The applicant agreed to
prohibit use of the gymnasium between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. the following day. A condition
of approval is warranted to that effect.
4. The hearings officer finds that lighting on the site will not impact adjacent
properties. Section 18.725.030.E of the Tigard Development Code (the"TDC") prohibits
on-site lighting from casting direct or reflected glare on adjacent properties. The applicant
states that recessed down lights are proposed for the outdoor security lighting. The west
exit will have a single wall mount fixture above the door with appropriate shielding to
prevent glare or light intrusion on neighboring properties.
5. The proposed development will have no impact on parking. The proposed
accessory building is intended to support the existing church. It will not increase the
capacity of the church or generate additional traffic and parking demand. Parking impacts
generated by the existing church are not relevant to this application. Parking is permitted
on public streets in the area on a first-come, first served basis. On-street parking is not
reserved for abutting residents and their guests.
6. There is no evidence that the proposed building will increase the amount of
graffiti in the area. Any new walls will provide an additional "canvas" for graffiti.
However there is no evidence that the proposed building will attract a disproportionate
amount of graffiti. The applicant will install low-level security lighting to facilitate visual
surveillance of the building and the applicant, like all other property owners in the City, is
required to promptly remove any graffiti that may occur. TMC 6.02.060.
7. Concerns were expressed about problems with noxious vegetation growing on
the site under existing conditions. TMC 6.02.020.A requires the applicant remove any
CUP 2014-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Japanese International Baptist Church) Page 5
noxious vegetation growing on the property or in the right-of-way abutting the property.'
It is in the applicant's interest to maintain vegetation on the site in compliance with these
regulations. Neighboring residents should inform the applicant if vegetation on the site is
not being maintained. Neighbors can also contact the City to request enforcement of these
standards. Enforcement is generally a complaint driven process. The City relies on citizen
complaints to identify violations. However, once a violation has been identified, the City
will enforce the laws. Neighbors can initiate the enforcement process by reporting any
violations they observe.
D. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the findings and discussion provided or incorporated in this final order, the
hearings officer concludes that the applicant sustained the burden of proof that the
proposed conditional use permit, sensitive lands permit, and adjustment, do or will
comply with the applicable criteria of the Community Development Code,provided
development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and
federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs
in fact.
E. DECISION
In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the
Staff Report and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings
officer hereby approves CUP 2014-00003 (Japanese International Baptist Church),
subject to the following conditions of approval:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY SITE WORK:
The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting
documents and/or plans that address the following requirements to the
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: Gary Pagenstecher,
503-718-2434. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the
required information is found:
'TMC 6.01.020.L defines"Noxious vegetation"as:
1. Weeds more than 10 inches high;
2. Grass more than 10 inches high,with the exception of agricultural crops;
3. Poison oak,poison ivy or similar vegetation;fire;4Vegetation that is likely to cause 5. Blackberry
bushes that extend into a right-of-way or across a property line;
6. Vegetation that is a health hazard;
7. Vegetation that is a health hazard because it impairs the view of the right-of-way or otherwise
makes use of the right-of-way hazardous;
CUP 2014-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Japanese International Baptist Church) Page 6
1. Prior to site work, the project arborist shall perform a site inspection for tree
protection measures, document compliance/non-compliance with the urban
forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to
the city manager or designee within one week of the site inspection.
2. The project arborist shall perform twice monthly site inspections for tree
protection measures during periods of active site development and construction,
document compliance/non-compliance with the urban forestry plan and send
written verification with a signature of approval directly to the project planner
within one week of the site inspection.
3. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit to the City of Tigard the current
Inventory Data Collection fee for urban forestry plan implementation. The
inventory fee is $958.00 ($147. first tree; $28 x 22 additional planted (16) and
existing (7) trees; $195 for 1 stand of trees).
4. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide a tree establishment bond that meets
the requirements of the Urban Forestry Manual Section 11, Part 2. The bond
amount is $7,056.
(16 planted trees x $441/tree)
5. The applicant shall provide a franchise hauler service provider letter confirming
the existing facility has adequate capacity.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tigard-
or.gov) for review and approval:
6. Prior to any work on site, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required
for this project to cover street improvements, public utility issues, and any other
work in the public right-of-way. Six (6) sets of detailed public improvement plans
shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. The PFI permit
plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of
the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee", and
who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. Failure to
provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing
of project documents.
7. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City
Engineer for the street design which is anticipated to include a 16-foot paved half
width plus an 5-foot planter, 5-foot sidewalk street trees, lights and any required
signs.
8. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City
Engineer of a design access report.
9. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City
Engineer and other appropriate agencies for the final design of the storm drainage
system to serve the site and any downstream impacts. Revise plans to show
Spruce Street draining to existing drainage along the north side of the street.
Submit the area of untreated runoff.
CUP 2014-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Japanese International Baptist Church) Page 7
10. Prior to any work on site the applicant shall obtain city and CWS approval of the
complete design of the stormwater detention facilities and maintenance plans for
them, including maintenance requirements and provisions for any treatments used.
11. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall provide documented approval from
the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) of the design of the proposed water
and fire service.
12. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin
Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) for the planned access and hydrant location.
13. Prior to any ground disturbance on the site, the applicant shall obtain an erosion
control permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the
Federal Clean Water Act. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and
Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition (and any
subsequent versions or updates)."
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT:
Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tigard-
or.gov) for review and approval:
14. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain all permits and
service provider letters necessary from all appropriate agencies (such as Washington
County, Tualatin Valley Water Department and Clean Water Services) for all work
to be done on site.
15. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain approval from
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue.
16. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall demonstrate that the
reconstructed sewer lateral, including portions that are not replaced, meet
standards.
17. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain city approval of
plans for the construction of the stormwater treatment facilities and a Storm Water
Connection Authorization.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED
PRIOR TO A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION:
The applicant shall contact the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ATTN: Gary Pagenstecher 503-718-2434.
18. Prior to a final building inspection, the applicant shall call for a final planning
inspection to ensure the project was completed as shown on the approved plan.
Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tigard-
or.gov)for review and approval:
CUP 2014-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Japanese International Baptist Church) Page 8
19. Prior to final inspection, all elements of the proposed infrastructure (such as
transportation, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, water, etc.) shall be in place and
operational with accepted maintenance plans. The developer's engineer shall
provide written certification that all improvements, workmanship and materials
are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices,
and are of high grade, prior to city acceptance of the development's improvements
or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance.
20. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall obtain an approved Washington
County Facility Permit for the complete construction of required street
improvements.
21. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall obtain city and CWS approval of the
complete construction of the stormwater treatment facilities and maintenance
plans. (Contact Brian Wheatley at 503-718-2610).
22. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall provide a final sight distance report.
23. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley
Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) for access and hydrant location and any other necessary
construction.
24. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall submit payment of$5,950 for the fee
in-lieu of relocating utilities underground.
OPERATION OF THE FACILITY SHALL
COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION:
25. The gymnasium shall not be used between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. the following day.
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN(18) MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HEARINGS OFFICER'S DECISION.
DATED this ay of January 2014.
�i�t���i
Joe Turner, Esq., AICP
City of Tigard Land Use Hearings Officer
CUP 2014-00003 Hearings Officer Final Order
(Japanese International Baptist Church) Page 9
I
- ,.. 1 VICINITY MAP
• •--1 < __,
''d ' u..1 i
›
-4
CUP2014-00003
-4 4,44
Japanese International
Jo
Baptist Church Expansion
4J -.1 iN
-, 2 ...e-4 __II ,..j •.-... co ...--I
-3
1 -3 > ........1 ___ ----
41
..t ..i J -3
" --J.,...• --./ "t.' j i
..i,
..._.1 .....,1 14 ..a .,... ---I .....I
•r
PINE S I
J — _1 ...i „...!
..-1 J j. J - 1 ; L ; •..: ----1 _j-I
J ...i ct
,
t'
4 , -.I - .1 --
'.. __J j ""j
-,..x. — .
— ....e
ri j ..., .,..i .1 .-,-,. , —_i Subject Site sPRuc c 7 I —i
_
P:47771
sim..... Si' ,. ' .:: r. s
.:r -...ri --.. ----:
3 II IV:ifir '''' ''.--
:,.,.
—, < . -./ ....i i imss•••i •
' WIFE:M.3El __I
i 14,,i ...1 ...-.‘
-- -i—JOEL LE 1,11:71:11 '.J4 I / -4.' j -.3....-1...4.
,
.4 j -.-s ---, J ,2
,7. 1
f t j
i U C 1
"I L L E C Auk-4 glE1
,..1 .
-i ...I 'IIIIIIML_ --.3 ---I i ...j
—I ' --3-....4 11111..M..11. .."`"‘ -"1 7 il (":R t'l
INNENINEEME ..-J ...r. 1 i --.....1 1111111111•MIIIMII !
Noissmime --, - .11
-r , -....1 i -'11 .3 '-' 4
IIIMINEEMINIIIII
..., -- ,--,
,---- ,- Vi. ."..- 7
...1
-.1 34 '''4 ,i-- --' •.1 fa e -,-, Information on this Map is tor general location
--3
I "4 only and should be verified with the
00".`.. 1 ', Ca 0, -1 Development Services Division.
..,
.a.„,
_..J _1
,.. --= ...-
Approx.Scale 1 4,0013-1 in=333 ft
t >
-.3 --i -.3 Q. r-
.,....." IZE
Map printed at 07 13AM on 26-Nov-14
-i "Lj .....X.
I ..„,.....
--__.3 ,
.-4.- > ...e 'r-- : DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES THE CITY OF TIGARD
$ ......1 1 PI S i j < ; _r' ...4 " MANES NO WARRANTY REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE
•
CONTENT ACCURACY TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANT OF
......, ...;$ ..4 ...A ..,„. - $ TMIVIVF"OrDEDEHREMA 7 CaLct,L'ctrctZetEISIY.14°
e
al INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED.
' $ / ... >
i ,,,i
—1 —1 -
.4 '-‘-
J 7 - C\I ..r city of Tigard Feet .1 -- .:
Jm i J --1 - ...f 13125 SW Hall Blvd
c ECC 1 ,<-_,, ...12 -A —I —4 t
...4 TIGARDI/Ari Tigard,OR 97223 .114-- •
503 639-4171 ; a
IMMINEI - . . wv^v.tgard-or gov
1
. —I
. .I
•
:1!
r n J
'cr.,:'cr.,: dC'BLZ M.B RI
EB[.005 U
30' 30' 0 t�
cc @ F-
a €W
F
1 �• ia _�"$
ri
y`J' w �NSM
N
srtE nsuu m .m. Q�e•�
aEARAxcE AREA m F_
SW 85TH AVE 1 1m) '-'
EY BL 3.9E 61•005 $
ti R^8
—_____ .._...,
Apo - n
�
_ gF
F
II S 8
IT I
O1 T 1 1 - RaI 3 B^ Z_ SFS
VI t
U
REMOVE SIDEWALK
�- t 10'92E 3.T£,YTe00N
CURB TIGHT SIDE WITH I ,-3 - ALL OH-SITE CR ETE ONtaOE
B RECOPSTROCI WITH TO BE r CONCRETE ON I.OF +—
a•RANTER STRIP „ 3/4--0-GRUSHED ROCK ^ y,.N
zo j o
B
ss.— -0 p §ry P 8 t
B
MP , "
O STREET o -
IMPROVEMENT 1_ , jl
I. ._. . 1 i 1 J = m a
. . 9T'9R M.Z[,TBROBR - - - ,• u—{ g
1
LU
Bgo
I •'wi aO.LV
SW SPRUCE STREETi e-
[:IUGI
t ' aun».aBTORTA9.1A9B sRT).C2
Cr
a so ,moo To PRELIMINARY FOR REVIEW ONLY 14
III . Notice of a Public Hearing — Type IIIA
Conditional Use Review
' l`'n l;l' Japanese International Baptist Church Expansion -
Case ID: CUP2014-00003
Tigard Community Development Contact Information
Date of Notice: Monday,November 24,2014
To: Interested Persons
Staff Contact: Gary Pagenstecher 503-718-2434 Garyp@tigard-or.gov
Development is proposed in your neighborhood that requires a land use review. The Hearings Officer will
conduct a public hearing beginning at 7:00 pm on Monday, December 22, 2014 in the Town Hall of the
Tigard Civic Center at 13525 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 97223.
Anyone wishing to present written testimony on this proposed action may do so by sending it in writing to Gary
Pagenstecher. We need to receive your written comments by 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, December 09, 2014 .
Please mail or deliver your comments to 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, Oregon 97223. Include the Case ID
Number: CUP2014-00003. Please address your comments to the appropriate staff person: Gary
Pagenstecher.Anyone wishing to present oral testimony may do so at the hearing.
Information About the Proposal
Description of the Proposal:
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use approval for the addition of an approximately 7,000 square
foot building that will be used for classrooms,a sport court,bathrooms, a play area and a coffee lounge. The
new building will be used for classrooms, recreation and other various church related uses. The building is
proposed to be sited near the front of the property,where the dwelling and playground were located. Access
to the site will continue to be from SW Spruce Street at the existing church driveway.
Applicant: Japanese International Baptist Church
8500 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Owner 1: Same as applicant
Applicant's Tony Weller
Representative: CESNW, Inc.
13190 SW 68th Parkway,Suite 150
Tigard, OR 97223
Proposal Address: 8500 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Legal 1S136CB04400
Description:
Zoning: R-12: Medium-Density Residential District
City of Tigard,Community Development Division •13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg. 1
I/CURPLN/FORMS/CU Staff Reports/Notice of Type T-III Housing_Templ_06-05-12
R-25: Medium High-Density Residential District
Approval Criteria: TDC 18.330
What You Should Know About This Type IIIA Proposal
This proposal requires a land use review. The goal of this notice is to invite interested parties to participate
early in the decision-making process by submitting comments in writing during the open comment period or
through oral testimony at the public hearing.
The Community Development Department will be making a recommendation to the Hearings Officer on
this proposal; our staff report and recommendation will be available for review at least seven days
before the hearing.
The final decision will be made by the Hearings Officer after consideration of the staff recommendation,
relevant evidence and public comments received during the open comment period and at the hearing. The
Hearings Officer's decision will be mailed to the applicant and anyone who submitted written comments or
is otherwise entitled to a decision notice.
Public Information Requests: A copy of the application, documents and evidence considered will be
contained in the public record and available for public review. If you would like to review this material at no
cost, please schedule an appointment with Lora Garland, Records Management Specialist, 503-718-2483. If
you wish to receive copies of the materials,city records will prepare them for you at a reasonable cost.
Public Comment and Hearing Process Information
The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the Tigard Development Code,
Chapter 18.390 and rules of procedure adopted by the Tigard City Council which are available online or by
request at City Hall.
At the hearing, the Hearings Officer will receive a staff report presentation from the city planner, open the
public hearing and invite both oral and written testimony. The Hearings Officer may continue the public
hearing into an additional meeting in order to obtain more information or may close the public hearing and
take action on the application.
If evidence in support of the application is submitted less than seven days prior to the public hearing, any
party is entitled to request a continuance of the hearing. If there is no continuance granted at the hearing, any
participant in attendance may request that the record remain for at least seven additional days after the
hearing.
Appeal Information
Failure to raise any issue regarding this proposal, either in person or in writing prior to the close of the public
hearing, or failure to provide testimony or sufficient evidence to allow the hearings officer to respond to the
issue,precludes an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals based on that issue.
Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude
subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Comments directed at
the relevant approval criteria (Tigard Development Code) are what constitute relevant evidence. Details
regarding the appeal process and requirements are contained within Tigard Development Code Chapter
18.390. There is a fee charged for appeals.
Attachments Included in this Notice
Zoning and Site Map
City of Tigard,Community Development Division •13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg.2
I/CURPLN/FORMS/QJ Staff Reports/Notice of Type T-III Housing_Templ_06-05-12
Notice to Mortgagee, Lienholder,Vendor, or Seller
The Tigard Development Code requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the
purchaser.
Final Comment Deadline at 5 pm: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 120 days = Friday, February 27, 2015
Assistive Listening Devices and Interpreters: Assistive listening devices are available by request. The
city will also endeavor to arrange for a qualified sign language and bilingual interpreters upon request.
Please call 503-639-4171, extension 2438 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD —Telecommunications Device for
the Deaf). Please make these arrangements at least one week prior to the public hearing.
r LEA L 1 I � , II i ..� . i it -II Zoning Map
NN RI l
= � j OA T IQ " Generalized Zoning Categories
2
il,
U ��T� 1 __ _ _ Le,,..„,,Le,,..„,,1 �
>.
J ® s .as<.
Zone Deecrigon
I to .PINE ST —� li I invxHamiai
' -1 L �`- =Mood Ue as Ch e Central
—. Gmrmant
i•. 1 -MvN Use,Enrpbynam
1
J I I InMxna
R-12 - - R1 ci=_ ST ..I I I _L -Parts dR .Mon
_. _ . 'NNsn aio Ca,*Zonin4
1,';'
> L_ :: Overby Zenes
JOELLE: :: _Y-•, �'}Zj haroRC Oisbrd Ovenay
�CT-- •:: ::::•• � i'?)I�lam,ec 000ebPmera owner
—1
_ LuctuecT,tnm I _ �_. i /r-.I 1'.-
1 . ,. .
1 ,_ 1
'r-- ifPOR.N ST
sIcvEl
I_ R-12 _)_. ' i .1.jLi J-_
MUR-1 > — — (- -
-� �R-4.5
_ ..If-
-.- _-� i I MN>NvbC SC J _
p lei --- �:IIO R :.: .a.,a..-.,
NIMNEYSISMillialv
r � 1N .N.rvv'uvv aurtpari
x 1 r-- "-I- —i I cown,-nrcrvr,..*na,rrenw*v�rr
0 o -p :_.__.._ I j �._ 1 -_..- ��. I-'W -..r.v:Orr w.e
ni -
__ PF•'FFifEasT 1.... '. r> i .mz�ssw�u.a
as Rawv,
1 «.wy.e.ee.
City of Tigard,Community Development Division-13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg. 3
I/CURPLN/FORMS/CU Staff Reports/Notice of Type T-III Housing_Templ_06-05-12
Site Map
4gni
ffi
SW SPRUCE STRE T - +.m..cx.,
—"-- —# -_. .--------i----
I . ., .
1 3.
SyGO'E'S — we— 8 w -F,' `vi" PC.
P.,
00 AO'
0c �656 <
o 588°58'51•E 72.93' ,
y0p5 N
_Ey_ Np•T6
4 Inca T-1:
..—`' .6PC
n 4
nil
M
Q
Mi*':(5 NO. J
y,EP• 1013n
E
P r— 3
rig
JAPANESE
INTERNATIONAL p
'' ° 1 CVI
1189P0193M M.63
6 WN 1W35CBI ,
1 VAC
5 n
5
i
OOC.NO.2013.099496
i'i , S89'03969 158.
S 8 X,
r 114
m o
y
2
7 - P. Y C
19
„
D i yYRy it I Cp x; Ow,.
-< ,-v I F I Dane
gg J3
m 11 3 7 -!
E
0
2
r
-C
City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg.4
I/CURPLN/FORMS/QJ Staff Reports/Notice of Type T-III Housing_Templ_06-05-12
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE TIGARD
City of Tigard
•
Planning Division
ti •.44A�'�; 13125 SW Hall Boulevard
s. 4 z; Tigard, OR 97223
In the Matter of the Proposed Annexation of:
Land Use File No.: CUPA2014-00003
Land Use File Name: 8500 sw Spruce St-JIBC
I, Gary Pagenstecher, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Associate
Planner for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I personally posted notice of
Public Hearing on the Type III Planning Commission Development Review at the Tigard Public
Library.Tigard City Hall and the Tigard Permit Center, a copy of said notice being hereto attached
and by reference made a part hereof, on the 4th day of December,2014 .
Signature of Person o Performed Posting
(In the present of the Notary)
STATE OF OREGON
County of Washington ss.
City of Tigard
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the Ci day of - Ce i)?e :20
fT OFFICIAL STAMP
- k BETSY GAUCIA
NOTARYPUBLIC-OREGON
N ,925741 �� ^
COMMISSION N0.925741 (`Ce
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 09,2018
NOTARY PUBLI OF OREJOa 1�//�
My Commission Expires: !/
1:\CDADM\Sr Administrative Specialist\Affidavits\2014\Affidavit of Posting_CUP2014-00003_8500 SW Spruce StQJIBC Guy 120414.docs
RECEIVED
AUG 14 2014
CITY OF TIGARD
PLANNING/ENGINEERING
71
+ City of Tigard
TIGARD Land Use Permit Application PRE-APP.HELD BY:
File# (CUP20i4-0Ca.)3 Other Case#
Date el `14- By Receipt# `i1 l42 Fee 09014 Date Complete
TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR
❑Adjustment/Variance(II) ❑Historic Overlay(II or III) ❑Site Development Review(II)
0 Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑Home Occupation(II) 0 Subdivision(II or III)
KI Conditional Use(III) 0 Minor Land Partition(II) ❑Zone Change(III)
0 Development Code Amendment(IV) ❑Planned Development(Ili) El Zone Change Annexation(IV)
❑Downtown Design Review(I1,111) ❑Sensitive Lands Review(II or 111)
NOTE: FOR REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS,PLEASE REFER TO YOUR PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES
LOCATION WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY WILL.OCCUR(Addsss if available)
TAX
8500 SW ST Npruce Street
MAPS&1 S135AD02700 & 1S136CB04400
TOTAL SITE SIZE ZONING CLASSIFICATION
3AC R25 & R12
Am
APPLICANT*
Japanese International Baptist Church
MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP
8500 SW Spruce St, Tigard, OR 97224
PHONE NO. FAX NO.
503-246-4680
PRIMARY CONT ACT PERSON -_..._ PHONE NO.
Kenji Yokoi 503-705-5213
1-_,\I,
kenyokoy@gmail.com
PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER(Aaarh kv if more.Ilan one)
Japanese International Baptist Church
MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP
8500 SW Spruce St, Tigard, OR 97224
PHONE NO. FAX NO.
503-246-4680
*When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written
authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form
or submit a written authorization with this application.
PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific)
Conditional Use modification for the construction of a multi-purpose building with a small
gym, classrooms and coffee area.
City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97221 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 2
BEC E DEL)
OCI 2 2_014
OflIGPYti3�t._ANN NGI�NG NEERING
City of Tigard
Land Use Permit Application PRE-APP.HELD BY:
File# Other Case#
Date By Receipt# Fee Date Complete
TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR
❑Adjustment/Variance(II) ❑Historic Overlay(II or III) 0 Site Development Review(II)
❑Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) 0 Home Occupation(II) ❑Subdivision(II or III)
I,I Conditional Use(III) ❑Minor Land Partition(II) ❑Zone Change(III)
❑Development Code Amendment(IV) 0 Planned Development(III) ❑Zone Change Annexation(IV)
❑Downtown Design Review(I1,11I) 0 Sensitive Lands Review(II or IIl)
NOTE: FOR REQUIRED SUBMITTAL PI FMENTS,PLEASE REFER TO YOUR PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES
LOCATION WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY WILL OCCUR(Address if-m.2 able)
TA 8500 SW Spruce Street
MA PS Sc X LOT NOS.
1 S135AD02700 & 1 S136CB04400
TOTAL SITE SIZE ZONING CLASSIFICATION
3AC R25 & R12
1
APPLICANT'.
Japanese International Baptist Church
MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP
8500 SW Spruce St, Tigard, OR 97224
PHONE NO. FAX NO.
503-246-4680
PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON PHONE NO.
Kenji Yokoi 503-705-5213
E-MAIL
kenyokoy@gmail.com
PROPERTY.OWNER/DEED HOIDF,R(Ranch Est IF more Than one)
Japanese International Baptist Church
MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP
8500 SW Spruce St, Tigard, OR 97224
PHONE NO. FAX NO.
503-246-4680
*When the owner and the applicant arc different people,the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written
authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form
or submit a written authorization with this application.
PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific)
Conditional Use modification for the construction of a multi-purpose building with a small
gym, classrooms and coffee area.
City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 2
I
THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
• If the application is granted,the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and
subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval.
•
• All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are
true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is
found that any such statements are false.
• The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands
the requirements for approving or denying the application(s).
SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED.
P — /3 .0I44
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date
Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date
City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 503-718-2421 www.tigard-ot A Page 2 of 2
THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
• If the application is granted,the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and
subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval.
• All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are
true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is
found that any such statements are false.
• The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands
the requirements for approving or denying the application(s).
SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED.
(76).-' /3 0 /44
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature Date
Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date
Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date
City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 j www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 of 2
Waahington County,Oregon
11/20/2013 09:24:57 AM 2013-099496
0-085 Cnt=1 Stn=10 A DUYCK
$10,00$5.00$11.00 f 15.00•Total=541,00
IIIIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
RETURN TO:
Kelly E. Ford
4800 SW Griffith Dr., Ste 320 01896967201300994960020025 Beaverton OR 97005 1,Rlohero Hobarnleht,Clnttor of Aaaenmtnt antl Taxatly end En.ORlcio County Clark for Weahln ton
UNTIL REQUESTED OTHERWISE, Oregon do do hereby cerhrythat the within
g Instrument of writing was reeaIVstl a tl re Fortletl In the k- �'ll
SEND ALL TAX STATEMENTS TO: book of raceme or said cou(pJ�.(r �''.FFSy��pI���+//
No Change Richard Hohemlcht,Director sssss m
ent and '�.°.xP
Taxation,Ex-Ofnclo County Clerk
BARGAIN AND SALE DEED
For property line adjustment/lot consolidation
JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH, an Oregon
nonprofit corporation,Grantor, bargains and conveys to
JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH, an Oregon
nonprofit corporation, Grantee, the following real property
situated in Washington County, State of Oregon:
See Exhibit A attached for consolidated legal description.
The true consideration for this conveyance is property line adjustment/to create nne legal lot from two preexisting lots.
Per approved case file City of Tigard LLA2013-00005.
Original property deed recording numbers 2008-044583 and 2009-101377
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT
THE PERSON'S RIGHTS. IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300. 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11,
CHAPTER 424,OREGON LAWS 2007,AND SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17,CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009.THIS
INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF
APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON
ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING
DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR
PARCEL,AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010,TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL,TO
DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 AND TO
INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS,IF ANY,UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND
195.305 TO 195.338 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007,SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17,
CHAPTER 855,OREGON LAWS 2009,AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7,CHAPTER 8,OREGON LAWS 2010.THIS INSTRUMENT
DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE
LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON ACQURING FEE TITLE TO
THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT
THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL,AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010
OR 215.010,TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS
AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES,AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930, AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF
NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY. UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5
TO 11, CHAPTER 424,OREGON 2007,SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009,AND SECTIONS
2 TO 7,CHAPTER 8,OREGON LAWS 2010.
DATED this/3 day of/Ut/kr°'a^bf/', 2013.
JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH,
An Oregon nonprofit corporation
/
.6
Mike Yokoi, Preedent
STATE OF OREGON )
ss.
County of Washington
Personally appeared the above-named Mike Yokoi, as President of Japanese International Baptist
Church, and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be his voluntary act and deed.
BEFORE ME this /.3 day of X- J Jemytr , 2013. //�
'�:, OFFICIAL SEAL Oi
KELLY E FORD
NOTARYPUBUC-OREGON Notary Public for Oregon
„,,^" COMMISSION NO.459465
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY22,2015
4
r
Legal Description of Resulting Parcel
A tract of land in the northwest and southwest one-quarter of Section 36, T 1 S, R 1 W of the W.
M., in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being all of that parcel described as
adjusted parcel 1 conveyed to Japanese International Baptist Church, an Oregon nonprofit
corporation in deed recorded as Deed Document No. 2008-044503, and that parcel conveyed to
Japanese International Baptist Church, an Oregon nonprofit corporation in deed recorded as
Deed Document No. 2009-101377, deed records of Washington County, further described as
follows:
Beginning at a 2-inch brass disk marking the northwest corner of the Richardson DLC No. 55;
Thence along the south line of the plat of"Metzger Acre Tracts," South 89 degrees 00;'59"East,
158.12 feet to a found 5/8"iron rod with yellow plastic cap marked 'Marx & Assoc.";
Thence, along the east line of the parcel, South 00 degrees 12'03"West 274.72 feet to the
southwest corner of that tract of land conveyed to Timothy L. Norris by Deed Document No.
2004-102682 ;
Thence, along the south line of said Norris Tract, South 88 degrees 59'29"East, 158.36 feet to
the west line of the plat of"Steve&Hughie's Place,"
Thence along the west line of said plat of"Steve & Hughie's Place," South 00 degrees 11'00"
West,206.49 feet to a 5/8" iron rod with yellow plastic cap marked"SR Design" set on the
southerly right-of-way line of SW Steve Street at the northwest corner of Lot 12 of said plat of
"Steve& Hughie's Place;"
Thence North 86 degrees 36'18" West, 158.66 feet to a found 5/8 " iron rod at the northeast
corner of that tract of land conveyed to Gatehouse LLC as Parcel 2 of Deed Document No. 2006-
08568;
Thence along the north line of said Gatehouse Tract,North 88 degrees 58'05" West, 158.33 feet
to the east line of Parcel 2 of Partition Plat No. 1992-025;
Thence North 00 degrees i3'34"East,246.83 feet;
Thence North 89 degrees 06' West 84.5 feet;
Thence North 110 feet;
Thence continuing North along the East line of that certain tract conveyed to George C.
Plagman,et ux,by deed recorded April 17, 1951, in Book 319, Page 324, Deed Records of
Washington County, Oregon, 116.24 feet; thence North 89 degrees 58' East 85 feet to the place
of beginning.
Response: The site is 3 acres in size and exceeds the minimum lot size of 20,000 square
feet for this use. The area of the site with the proposed building addition provides adequate
room for the use within the required setbacks.
2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size,
shape, location, topography, and natural features;
Response: The location of the proposed building addition is close to Spruce Street and
provides good pedestrian access and is located in the flatter portion of the site away from the
existing wetland area.
3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal;
Response: All public facilities are available to the site and adequate to serve the church and
the proposed building addition.
4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this
chapter;
Response: The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met.
5. The applicable requirements of Section 18.330.050; and
Response: The proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 18.330.050 as
discussed within that section of this document.
6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapter of this code, including, but
not limited to, Chapter 18.780, Signs; Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening;
Chapter 18.790, Urban Forestry Plan, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review,
if applicable, are met.
Response: These supplementary requirements have been met and are further discussed
within the applicable chapters/sections of this document.
18.330.040 Additional Submission Requirements
In addition to the submission requirements in Chapter 18.390, Decision Making Procedures, an
application for conditional use approval must include the following additional information in graphic,
tabular and/or narrative form. The director shall provide a list of the specific information to be included
in each of the following:
A. Existing site conditions;
B. A site plan;
C. A grading plan;
D. A landscape plan;
E. An urban forestry plan consistent with Chapter 18.790;
F. Architectural elevations of all structures; and
G. A copy of all existing and proposed restrictions or covenants.
Response: The required items are included with the application package.
18.330.050 Additional Development Standards for Conditional Use Types
B. Additional development standards. The additional dimensional requirements and approval
standards for conditional use are as follows:
8. Religious Institutions
a. Minimum lot size shall be 20,000 square feet;
Japanese International Baptist Church Page 3 of 13 CESNW,Inc.
Conditional Use
Response: The site is approximately 3 acres, no new lots are proposed.
b. Setbacks:
i. The front yard setback shall be a minimum of 25 feet;
ii. On corner lots and through lots, the setback shall be a minimum of 20
feet, plus meet visual clearance areas, Chapter 18.795;
The side yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet;
iv. The rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20 feet;and
v. Each setback shall be increased five feet for every 10 feet of building
height over 45 feet.
Response: The building meets or exceeds minimum setback requirements.
Setbacks are shown on sheet C2 of the plans.
18.390 Decision-Making Procedures
18.390.050 Type Ill Procedure
A. Preapplication conference.
Response: A preapplication conference was held on October 17, 2013 and a copy of the
notes is included with the application.
B. Application requirements
1. Application forms...
2. Content. Type Ill applications shall:
a. Include the information requested on the application form;
b. Address the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and action;
c. Be accompanied by the required fee;
d. Include two sets of pre-stamped, pre-addressed envelopes...
e. Include an impact study. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the
development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a
minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system,
the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts
of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the
study shall propose improvements necessary to meet city standards and to
minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities
systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the
community development code requires dedication of real property interests, the
applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or
provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property
dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the project impacts of the
development. ...
Response: The application form, fee, and narrative are included with the application
package. The two sets of pre-stamped envelopes will be provided when requested by the
City as prescribed on the City's label request form.
The application is for an accessory building on the grounds of an existing church. The
building is proposed to be approximately 7,000 square feet in size and will contain
classrooms, a basketball court, bathrooms, a play area and coffee lounge. The site is
already served with all necessary public services. The expected impacts on public facilities
and services are as follows:
Japanese International Baptist Church Page 4 of 13 CESNW,Inc.
Conditional Use
Transportation System
The addition of the proposed building on church property is expected to have no negative
impact on the transportation system. No additional dedication of right-of-way is required. A
half-street improvement is proposed along the unimproved portion of the site frontage, and
includes paving curbs, street trees, and replacing an existing curb-tight sidewalk with a
planter strip and new sidewalk.
The site is a developed site with a primary use as Church and consists of an existing main
worship building, accessory buildings and parking. The proposed building addition is an
accessory to the primary church and will not generate additional trips. Therefore, the
proposed building addition will not impact the surrounding transportation system.
The City's 2035 Transportation System Plan (Figure 5-2 Road Functional Classification)
identifies SW Spruce St as a "Local" classification. The City's Community Development Code
Table 18.810.1 indicates that for Local streets with ADT's under 1500, a right-of way of 54-
feet and pavement width of 32-feet is required. The SW Spruce St right-of-way is currently
60-feet for the full length of the church property. The half-width right-of-way along the
churches frontage to Spruce St is 30-feet. At the City's Pre-Application meeting it was
confirmed that adequate right-of-way exists for the streets ultimate functional classification
and that a partial street improvement will be needed along SW Spruce St. The proposed
partial street improvements will include a half-street widening of SW Spruce St to 16-feet
where the half-street pavement width is currently less than 16-feet along with curb, planter,
sidewalk and street trees.
The proposed partial street improvements on SW Spruce St will be built to The City's
standards for a Local street designation and does not include bike lane. Table 18.810.1
indicates that a Bike Lane is not required for the Local road classification.
The Washington County Transportation Development Tax (TDT) is based on the
development's impact upon the City's transportation system. Specifically, the fee is based
upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The
proposed building is an accessory use to the primary use as a church. For planning
purposes the new building will not generate additional trips. In fact, the impact to the
transportation system is reduced by the removal of the existing single family residence.
Based on the TDT information provided by the City, the new building is assessed a TDT fee
based on its total square footage even if it does not generate additional trips. The TDT fee
was based on 1/2 of the church school rate and results in a fee of$15,044. The recovery rate
for this use is 28.3%. Based on this recovery rate the total impact to the transportation
system is $53,159. However eliminating the existing single family house reduces the impact
by its TDT and recovery rate ($6665/26.6% = $25,056). The net total impact is $28,103. The
estimated cost of the proposed street widening is $21,000. The total transportation mitigation
cost is the value of the street widening plus the TDT fee which equals $29,379. The
combined cost of the TDT fee and required improvements just exceeds the net impact of the
proposed building. Any additional improvement requirements would not be proportional to
the impact.
Japanese International Baptist Church Page 5 0113 CESNW,Inc.
Conditional Use
Storm Drainage System
The site and its existing improvements generally drain from the north to south, to the existing
on-site water quality and detention pond located near its south end. This existing water
quality and detention pond then discharges into the natural drainage at the south end of the
site. The existing on-site storm system will remain intact and unmodified. All stormwater
runoff resulting from the proposed building addition and associated on-site improvements will
be collected in a separate on-site storm pipe system and be directed to a new on-site
extended dry detention pond. The new on-site extended dry detention pond is located about
mid-site to the west of the existing main building. The post-development flows for the
proposed building addition will be treated and detained by the new extended dry detention
pond in accordance with City's requirements and Clean Water Services standards. The
stormwater flows will then be released from the detention pond as sheet flow at pre-
development rates to the natural drainage at the south end of the site.
The proposed storm water facilities mitigate any stormwater impacts resulting from the
proposed onsite improvements.
The proposed off-site half street improvements generally drain away from the site (to the
north and then to the west) to an existing culvert in the right-of-way near the northwest corner
of the site that discharges to a shallow road-side dich that conveys flows to the west. As part
of the half-street improvements proposed for the project, a catch basin will be constructed at
the west end of the half-street improvements and the catch basin's discharge pipe will
replace the existing culvert and discharge to its same location in the existing shallow road-
side ditch. The stormwater impact from the proposed half street improvements will be
negligible, and discharge from the proposed catch basin will flow to the west in the existing
shallow road-side ditch. Any stormwater quality or quantity impacts created by the half street
improvement will be addressed through a "Fee in Lieu" payment.
A Preliminary Stormwater Report Memorandum is included as part of this application.
Sanitary Sewer System
The existing church facilities and the existing single family residence currently on the site are
served by two separate sewer laterals. The existing residence is connected to the 8-inch
public sanitary sewer main in SW Spruce St. The existing church building is connected to the
8-inch public sanitary sewer main south of the church that runs through the wetland area. The
proposed building addition will utilize the existing sewer lateral for the single family residence.
The anticipated flow generation for the proposed building addition is comparable to a single
family residence. Therefore, the proposed building will not negatively impact the existing
sewer system.
Water System
The existing church facilities and the existing single family residence on the site are served
by two separate water service connections to the 8-inch public water main in SW Spruce St.
The water main in SW Spruce St is within the Tualatin Valley Water District's service area.
Japanese International Baptist Church Page 6 of 13 CESNW,Inc.
Conditional Use
The water service for the church will remain as is, and the proposed building addition will
utilize the existing water service for the single family residence for domestic service. The
anticipated water demand for the proposed building addition is comparable to that of the
single family residence. Therefore, the proposed building addition will not impact the existing
water system. Tualatin Valley Water District has also provided a statement of service
availability for the project. Tualatin Valley Water District has also provided a nearby fire flow
test demonstrating adequate fire flow for the project. The project contractor has met with the
City building department and determined that fire sprinklers would not be required for this
project.
Parks
The proposed building is not expected to have any impact on the park system. Any adverse
impacts to the parks system will be offset by payment of SDCs.
Noise
Except for the toddler play area, upon completion of construction, activities associated with
the new building will take place inside the building. The play area is located in a fenced area
adjacent to Spruce Street and replaces an existing outdoor playground that will be removed
for this project. Therefore there will not be any adverse noise impacts from the proposed
building.
18.510 Residential Zoning Districts
18.510.020 List of Zoning Districts
F. R-12: Medium-density residential district. The R-12 zoning district is designed to
accommodate a full range of housing types at a minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide
range of civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally.
G. R-25: Medium High-density residential district. The R-25 zoning district is designed to
accommodate existing housing of all types and new attached single-family and multifamily
housing units at a minimum lot size of 1,480 square feet. A limited amount of neighborhood
commercial uses is permitted outright and a wide range of civic and institutional uses are
permitted conditionally.
Response: Religious institutions are conditional uses in the R-12 and R-25 zoning districts.
18.510.030 Uses
Response: Religious institutions are permitted as Conditional Uses in the R-12 and R-25
districts.
Japanese International Baptist Church Page 7 of 13 CESNW,Inc.
Conditional Use
18.510.050 Development Standards
Response: The table below illustrates the required setbacks for the zoning district. The
proposed use is a conditional use and requires greater setbacks than those specified by the
district. The proposed use meets or exceeds all setback requirements for the district and the
use.
Standards Required R-12 Required R-25 Proposed
MF-SF (Religious
Institutions)
Minimum Setbacks
Front Yard 15-20' 15-20' 25'
Street Side Yard 10-20' 10-20' N/A
Side Yard 5-10' 5-10' 20'
Rear Yard 15-20' 15-20' 100+'
Dist. Between property 20' 20' N/A
line and front of garage
Maximum Height 35' 45' 26'
Maximum Lot Coverage 80% 80% 66% 114
Minimum Landscape 20% 20% 69% Ibb(+
Requirement
18.705 Access, Egress and Circulation
18.705.030 General Provisions
A. Continuing obligation of property owner...
Response: The Japanese Baptist International Church will continue to occupy the site and
maintain access as required.
B. Access plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are
presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and
circulation requirements are to be fulfilled...
Response: The existing access is shown on the plans, and will continue to serve the site.
Appropriate plans will be submitted for review and approval of all necessary permits prior to
construction.
C. Joint Access...
Response: Joint access is not proposed.
D. Public Street Access. All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030.H
and 18.705.030.1 shall connect directly with a public or private street...
Response: Access to the site will continue to be from SW Spruce Street, a public street. The
church will continue to operate onsite and will maintain access.
E. Curb cuts.
Response: No new curb cuts are proposed.
F. Required walkway location. On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following
standards...
Japanese International Baptist Church Page 8 of 13 CESNW,Inc.
Conditional Use
Response: Walkways are proposed to connect the new building to the existing building and
parking area, and sidewalks surrounding the building are designed to meet the requirements
of this section.
G. Inadequate or hazardous access.
Response: Inadequate or hazardous access is not proposed.
H. Access management.
Response: The new building will be accessed from the existing church property, using the
existing access off of Spruce Street. The existing residential driveway where the new
building is proposed will be eliminated. The existing residential driveways to the east are
located at 33 feet and 157 feet from the center of the church's existing access. The existing
residential driveways to the west are located at 161 feet and 305 feet from the center of the
church's existing access.
I. Minimum access requirements for residential use.
Response: Residential uses are not proposed.
J. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use.
Response: Commercial or industrial uses are not proposed. The existing access is 30'
wide, with curbs and 24 feet of pavement. No new accesses are proposed.
18.725 Environmental Performance Standards
18.725.030 Performance Standards
A. Noise...
B. Visible Emissions...
C. Vibration...
D. Odors...
E. Glare and Heat...
F. Insects and rodents...
Response: The proposed use will not generate excessive noise, visible emissions,
disallowed vibrations, odors, glare or heat. Recessed down lights are proposed for the north
and south entrances. The west exit will have a wall mount fixture with appropriate shielding
to prevent glare or light intrusion on neighboring properties. Materials will be stored and
grounds maintained so as to not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create
a health hazard.
18.745 Landscaping and Screening Standards
18.745.040 Street Tree Standards
Response: Proposed street tree locations are shown on the plans. Trees will be selected,
planted and maintained in compliance with City standards. Soil volumes are addressed on
the landscaping plans.
18.745.050 Buffering and Screening
A. General Provisions.
Japanese International Baptist Church Page 9 of 13 CESNW, Inc.
Conditional Use
2. Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are
of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this Chapter...
Response: Per pre-app notes, no buffers are required on any side. The Buffer Matrix does
not specify any buffer requirements for religious institutions other than the required setbacks.
B. Buffering and Screening requirements.
1. A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and
having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and
containing a length equal to the length of the property line of the abutting use or uses.
Response: Per pre-app notes and the Buffer Matrix, no buffer is required.
E. Screening: special provisions.
1. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas:
a. Screening of parking and loading areas is required...The specifications for this
screening are as follows:
i. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which
effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design
features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls
and raised planters;
ii. Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance
of off-street parking areas from the public right-of-way.
iii. Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying
and vertical shrubbery and trees;
iv. All parking areas, including parking spaces and aisles, shall be
required to achieve at least 30% tree canopy cover at maturity directly
above the parking area in accordance with the parking lot tree canopy
standards in the Urban Forestry Manual.
Response: A 6' to 8' wood fence and existing trees screen the majority of the parking
lot from view of neighbors and from the street. Additional landscaping is proposed
along the westerly side of the building. Existing parking lot tree canopy cover is 5%.
With the added trees the proposed parking lot tree canopy will be 36%.
2. Screening of service facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwelling, any
refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air
conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident
parking are, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by
placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height.
All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area.
Response: The refuse containers and services facilities are not visible from the public
street or by surrounding neighbors. The refuse containers are carts similar to
residential refuse containers, not a dumpster. The refuse carts are kept behind the
main church building.
4. Screening of refuse containers. Except for one-and two-family dwellings, any refuse container
or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or
commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed
from view by place of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be
contained within the screened area.
Japanese International Baptist Church Page 10 of 13 CESNW,Inc.
Conditional Use
Response: The refuse containers are carts that are wheeled up to the street on pick-
up day, not a dumpster, and they are stored out of sight of the parking lot, public street
and surrounding neighbors.
F. Buffer matrix.
Response: No buffer is specified for religious institutions.
18.755 Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage
18.755.040 Methods of Demonstrating Compliance
A. Alternative methods of compliance. An applicant shall choose one of the following four
methods to demonstrate compliance:
1. Minimum standards;
2. Waste assessment;
3. Comprehensive recycling plan; or
4. Franchised hauler review and sign-off.
Response: The applicant has very small waste stream that is currently served by Waste
Management with 2 trash carts and 2 recycle carts that are wheeled to the curb for weekly
pick up. The neighborhood is residential, so the weekly pick up from the Church coincides
with the neighborhood schedule and is currently working well for the Church. Therefore the
Church has chosen the Franchised hauler review and sign off option since the current service
level meets both the needs of the Church and the hauler.
18.755.050 Location, Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas
B. Location Standards
1. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co-
located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste;
2. Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code
requirements;
3. Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple
locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations.
4. Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas.
Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a
yard adjacent to a public or private street;
5. Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to
enhance security for users;
6. Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at
least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the
areas used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to
the provisions in 18.755.050.C, design standards;
7. The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the
storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on
public streets adjacent to the site.
Response: The 2 trash carts and 2 recycling carts are currently kept on the west side of the
main church building. This puts the receptacles is an area that is not visible from the parking
lot or neighboring properties.
Japanese International Baptist Church Page 11 of 13 CESNW,Inc.
Conditional Use
1
18.765 Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements
18.765.020 Applicability of Provisions
A. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new
structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of
use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access
requirements.
Response: As per the pre-application notes, the proposed building is an accessory use to
the church and will not generate any additional access or parking needs. Therefore this
section is not applicable to this application.
18.780 Signs
Response: No new signs are proposed.
18.790 Urban Forestry Plan
18.790.030 Urban Forestry Plan Requirements
A. Urban forestry plan requirements. An urban forestry plan shall:
1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect(the project landscape
architect) or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor(the project
arborist), except for minor land partitions that can demonstrate compliance with
effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in
open soil volumes only;
2. Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in the Urban Forestry
Manual;
3. Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual;and
4. Meet the supplemental report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual.
Response: An Urban Forestry Plan has been completed by Anderson Associates
demonstrating an existing mature tree canopy cover of 34% and a proposed mature tree
canopy of 47%, is included with the application materials.
18.795 Visual Clearance Areas
18.795.030 Visual Clearance Requirements
A. At corners. Except within the CBD zoning district a visual clearance area shall be maintained
on the corners of all property adjacent to the intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or
a driveway providing access to a public or private street.
B. Obstructions prohibited.
C. Additional topographical constraints.
Response: Visual clearance areas are shown on the plans and will continue to be
maintained as specified by the City. The site does not present topographical constraints to
visual clearance requirements. The preliminary site distance certification is included with the
application materials. Minor vegetation removal within the right of way west of the property
and trimming back the hedge along the east property line will provide adequate intersection
site distance.
Japanese International Baptist Church Page 12 of 13 CESNW, Inc.
Conditional Use
18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards
18.810.070 Sidewalks
8.2. Requirement of Developers. If there is an existing sidewalk on the same side of the street as
the development within 300 feet of a development site in either direction, the sidewalk shall be
extended from the site to meet the existing sidewalk, subject to the rough proportionality(even if the
sidewalk does not serve a neighborhood activity center).
Response: There are no existing sidewalks to the east of the site. There are no existing
sidewalks west of the site on Spruce Street. The closest existing sidewalk is south of Spruce
Street on Hall Blvd and is over 300 feet from the northwest corner of the site as measured
along the existing roadway.
18.810.120 Utilities
A. Underground utilities. All utility lines including, but not limited to those required for electric,
communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed
underground...
Response: The applicant is requesting a fee in-lieu of for the undergrounding of the
overhead utilities due to the small street frontage. Any new onsite utilities will be constructed
underground.
Conclusion: The proposed accessory building meets the standards and can be approved.
Japanese International Baptist Church Page 13 of 13 CESNV,Inc.
Conditional Use
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING/POSTING
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE
IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A COPY OF THE
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY
OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE,TO THE ADDRESS BELOW:
City of Tigard Planning Division
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard,OR 97223-8189
IN ADDITION,THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT&COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF
APPLICATION.
MAILING: 'y, l
I, frLeht1( �0K-01 being duly sworn,depose and say that on the 7Oftitday of �1/1`La f ,
20/(� ,1t caused to have mailed to each of the ersonLon the ttached list,a notice of meeting to discuss a proposed development at
(or near) $ 500 )IA} cpv N C( 9. `Tryat4/ J`}€ 7h -?7 a copy of which notice so mailed
is attached hereto and made a part of hereof.
I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly aggressed to said pe ons and,wett_tdgposid�on thedate indicated
above in the United States Post Office located at 122/C CIA/ ,(,(Gall S4- j p 64L4 f f 4 Z
with postage prepaid thereon. • 'f
Si :r
mire resence of a Notary Public)
POSTING:
I, ,do affirm that I (repres nt)tF party initiating interest in a proposed land use application
for c bltAlt7 c�it� i lcaffecting the land located at (state the agproxima
location(s)IF no add ess(s)and all tax lot(s)currently registered) 817,0/) 5W Spvt,IL_Q, S 1'Q�t-d / a_l'12i
--— -_ — ,and did on the "f
day of .(71 V 20 per�Qnally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a
7,2ce.Fri`f u Cie TVA AK ]p t v�AI land use application,and the time,date and place of a
neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal.
The sign was posted at (�t:iCt r^ �GtI 3 fW SAL{/ S .t.e.f 1 �(//4 b
(State the location you posted notice on proper
attire the presen o a • Public)
(THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,N TARY PI : IC TO CO PLETE/NOTARIZE)
STATE OF o✓c)ot )
County of t,Jo��;� �J )as.Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the I -day of kL kS-1\J\ ,20 t4 .
OFFICIAL SEAL U? t 61C1 -.—
RYAN ALAN KRAUSE
NOTARY PUBLIC •OREGON NOT Y PUBLIC OF OREGON
Aril COMMISSION NO. 475791 My mission Expires:
MT COMMISSION EXPIRES EEIRUART IS 1111
!� I
\alltP1.N\Mastrrs\pre-Appbn.tion Conferee r Packet\Affidavit of&lading-Posting Neighborhood Mccting.docx Updated 1/25/2011
1
Tony Weller
From: Kenji Yokoy <kenyokoy@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday,July 24,2014 11:10 AM
To: Tony Weller
Subject: Fwd:Your labels are ready at Tigard City Hall
Forwarded message
From: Christine Wiley<ChristineW@u,tigard-or.gov>
Date: Wed,Oct 23, 2013 at 9:26 AM
Subject: Your labels are ready at Tigard City Hall
To: Kenji Yokoy<kenyokoy@gmail.com>
Good morning Ken—your labels are ready. I left them for you at the front desk in the Permit Center at
Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd. We are open 8am-5pm, Monday through Thursday. The
processing fee for the labels is $29 and is payable when you pick them up. Please contact me if you
need anything else. Thank you.
From: Kenji Yokoy [mailto:kenvokov@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:36 AM
To: Christine Wiley
Subject: Fwd: Document scanned
Forwarded message
From: JibcSecretaryli<jibconline(7a,gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:33 AM
Subject: Fwd: Document scanned
To: Kenji Yokoy<kenyokoyAgmail.com>
Forwarded message
From: Yaso<tvyaso(a,gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Oct 22,2013 at 9:29 AM
Subject: Document scanned
To: Secretary itr Jibc<iibconlinena,gmail.com>
Tom Yaso (Cell&Text#971-832-9608)
t
Mutsuko @i-T Wepsala,`J I BC Secretary
JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH
8500 SW Spruce St.
Tigard, OR 97223
(503)246-4680
DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws.
If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon
Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon
Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule."
2
Notice of Neighborhood Meeting
Date: 10/30/13
RE: Educational building at the Japanese International Baptist Church
Dear Interested Party:
The Japanese International Baptist Church is the owner of the property locate at 8512 SW Spruce St.
Tigard, Oregon 97223. We are considering proposing a conditional use permit in the hopes of
constructing a 7200 square foot educational building at this location.
Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary land use approvals, I would like to discuss the
proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents.You are invited to attend a
meeting on:
Thursday, November 14,2013 at the Japanese International Baptist Church,located at 8500 SW
Spruce St.Tigard,OR 97223 at 7:00pm.
The building committee will be more than happy to field any questions you might have.
Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans.The plans may be altered prior
to the submittal of the application to the city.
I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call us at (503)246-4680 if
you have any questions Tuesday through Friday between 9am and 4pm for any questions.
Sincerely,
The Building Committee of the Japanese International Baptist Church
l
/' , •
/ ii_ /7
is---tt--e
i
\---
d
. . -,
i , -- ,
; 4 / 1
•• . ._.:,, .—._ . „A.:: i --
. ,... _ ..
- -----_ ---------7, 4 --------7---'
-.2
•, ,.., . i c( t.z.,., 4,,,,./ //// s— 1-f_.../
,
-.,
i . .
, t. 03:23 Sv,: '...;.\•C. ;e 4.,
i..; .
_... .,,.......„.....)
,
..... . ;.....,...Q..., L.i.t15x...kz.-.....1 p_„---()C. V'T.,...-T2rt--.,,,....;•4..1
;>•.,;,' ., ‘ 5 „ ( ,.-,2_,L4_,;:,. , ___ '1":,7, .'"? _ :.-t --, , •••7 r,jr44- C.,t.L-r-e".
(
-i
.- I , , ,- , ''' ''1;',t,`(.•C` ji-
1, .t-,....-,‘t',....„..-,,,..r.._ ., t ,..1.- T. •1 ,-,....'f I -••`..'II
:72...
...3 •., :7) r-:"--T '--63
I • ''' ----t--*----------,
-------
-
---..-...„_.
---------\ \-l', , •
L, \-,1 li• Lk VV.\
'-..
To our neighbors,
Thank you for coming out this evening. It is our desire to present to you our future plan and
listen to and answer any questions you may have about our future building project.
For quite some time now,due to our growth,we have been in dire need of more classroom and
multi-purpose space. Our average weekly attendance at our church is around 200 people, 1/3 of
them under the age of 18 (roughly 60-70 young people under the age of 18). The number of
young people we have in our church has necessitated the need for more classroom and multi-
purpose space. The number of classrooms and the overall space that we have has become
insufficient for our existing needs, leaving young people with nowhere to go besides nearby
coffee shops and restaurants during our Sunday fellowship. The overcrowding of the hallway
area also raises issues of safety in the case of an emergency.
Our proposal is to build a 7,200 square foot multi-purpose facility at 8512 SW Spruce Street
utilizing a company known as "Sprung". Sprung is a unique building solution that many
churches are utilizing today, among them is Rick Warren's Saddleback church. From what we
see,more and more churches are utilizing Sprung due to their ability to construct high quality
permanent structures at an unbeatable price, and churches are seeing great results. But not only
are churches utilizing Sprung, for instance,the Denver International Airport's main terminal is
constructed by Sprung. Other companies such as Intel,Boeing, Donald Trump and his casinos,
even the United States military and NASA have taken notice of"Sprung"and now all utilize
Sprung's unique structures.
Below are some frequently asked questions take directly off of Sprung's website.
General Questions
Is it a tent?
No. The Sprung structure is an engineered stressed membrane structure, the result of more than
three decades of research and development.
It is constructed of extruded aluminum arches, integrally connected to an all-weather
outer p -ne. This specialized membrane is certified flame-
retardant. Structures are engineered to withstand high wind loads and designed to shed snow.
With over a century of experience, Sprung delivers the most reliable, versatile and technically
advanced structures available in the world.
What architectural features of the building make it superior?
As evidenced by the more than 12,000 installations worldwide,the Sprung structure benefits
from lower capital costs, lower energy demands and lower life-cycle costs. Built with a 20-plus
year performance architectural membrane and a non-corroding aluminum substructure,it also
features exceptional durability and proven long-term performance.
What about vandalism and security?
Sprung structures are located in some of the worlds'most populated regions with no vandalism
problems.
An optional 81/2-foot-high Sprung Shield vandal-proof Hard-Wall system is available for extreme
security-sensitive applications. Our performance architectural membrane has a ripstop
construction that will help mitigate tearing should it be punctured.
Security is the same as for any building with windows. Motion detectors to set off alarms or to
summon security or police are used in the same way as for other structures.
Can it be air-conditioned or heated?
Sprung offers a truly effective insulation system,using eight-or nine-inch R-25 and R-30 Johns
Mansville fiberglass blanket insulation finished with an attractive tensioned interior finishing
membrane.
How are the acoustics?
Sprung structures have been used successfully on hundreds of acoustically sensitive applications.
The curved profile of the structure creates an interior free from conventional flat walls and
corners. The soft interior fabric walls effectively absorb sound,resulting in outstanding acoustic
properties.
Does it meet the building code?
The Sprung structure is designed to meet most building code requirements around the globe.
Once you are ready to proceed,we will supply a comprehensive permitting package, complete
with drawings and supporting calculations,all stamped by a licensed engineer certified in your
region.
After placing your order, these drawings are provided free of charge for most applications.
Who oversees the project?
Once a contractor is chosen,our technical consultant will remain on-site during the build to
monitor the project throughout construction to ensure quality is never compromised and your
structure is erected to our exacting standard.
A Sprung Technical Consultant attends to your site from start of erection, to completion to
ensure that your structure is erected to our engineering standards.
How long will a Sprung structure last?
Sprung structures are built to last, withstanding extreme weather and extreme situations.
The aluminum substructure has an indefinite life expectancy and a 30-year pro-rata guarantee.
Our performance architectural membranes have pro-rata guarantees of up to 20 years. Future
replacement membranes are inexpensive.
How fast can a Sprung structure be erected?
We inventory up to 2 million square feet of product for immediate delivery. Structures can be
erected at a rate of up to 1,000 square feet per day for insulated structures, and 2,000 square feet
per day for non-insulated structures.
The entire project takes a fraction of the time compared to conventional construction alternatives.
Is the building energy-efficient?
The Sprung building system,with R-25 to R-30 ratings, outperforms other types of construction
methods,resulting in improved year-round lower operational costs. There is almost zero air
leakage which owes to Sprung's unique design and superior insulation.
Below is a depiction of what our building may look on the outside. This is"Thunder Alley" from
the Grand Canyon University. An example of a typical Sprung structure.
Oh itt
1, 7A
A ICI
1111
IOU
X
u LJ
1
EI3
� �
iLo
SPRUCE ST
8570 8540 8512 8460
1 El I nor- P 1 ci
I ' 8500
SW Spruce St
[ El a g o 1 1 ._
> .• —1 _
COJOELLE
r
J EDI 11 Ian - _
Q
= LUCILLE —
On the next page is a scale lay out of what we are anticipating the internals of the building to
look like.
rS�i fi'`. 'S5.At....r. •�".}i � • °t.�i� } rw 5� , ,' °L. ''; kn �.ti r 3k;�: 4 'r>- 5 ' Yn ' _� �
,,
• ," ♦ i , ...4 y >: rl•.C,tr:',s ry .1*,
.� m !r ' Lit[ Y y �T �. v d . [ i • tt1A..T<- i 3 j . } ' ,.xsaf :• i } inf s31�4;f (•v. Se r}l 1£. .}:i0 .Z . }wyt• } \„ x.♦ r 4r, 3„Ni i `l. ti}4 f. 11 3-,-, 7'diA ) L { �. \ 4..
•
:a:P J1
1•Fr
caaSSret1u amvorvt cf.:w/e'wl Cl+,,0/u.4s
I + + � � + + + + + + +
htd
0iw,4q
+ + + + + + + + +
ii ii
Ivesar ei
Vz-cow►4_
C_ + + + + + + + , {{
I
V ��
of azvenii Ga%v ow 'v�w.m5 Cbff 4 + + + +
Lt 5 wc.+ + J. + +' — + t +
;.dot's
- [A L 4. —. .
120.1 nit. •
m � '
as
Main Bulldr� i
\ 5'
N, CsdufAA
\\ Via $
11/14/2013 JIBC Neighborhood meeting regarding future development plans
JIBC Building Committee members in attendance: Kenji Yokoi, Mike Yokoi,Ted Kameshima,Tom Yaso,
Scott Smith, Hajime Takehashi,Judd Nelson
Neighbors in attendance:
Matt Skoff 11115 SW 83'd Ave 503-620-2295
Craig Hilo(and son)8365 SW Steve St.
Jeff&Naomi Mimnaugh(and daughter)8545 SW Joelle Ct. 503-830-2044 counselorpdx@hotmail.com
Jim Long 10730 SW 72"d Ave 503-647-0021 mailto:bluepgs@vahoo.com
Monica Shumaker 8460 SW Spruce St. 503-244-0512
Meeting started by Kenji Yokoi at approx.7:02pm by reading the statement of purpose as required by
the City of Tigard.
Introduction of the JIBC building meeting committee members
Presented and read through the informational packet that was put together for neighborhood members
in attendance. Discussed the needs and reasons behind the purposed expansion, as well as our
reasoning for choosing Sprung structures and our proposed placement of the new building and the
possible internal design.
Opened for questions 7:09pm
Question/Concern by Jim Long:Are you expecting a mega-church
Response:We are a sending church where we send out our best. Over the years we have planted over
16 churches across the US, and our desire is not to become a mega church. We need this to create
classroom space,and create an enhancement to the community by providing a place where young
people and families can get out of the rain.
Question/Concern by Monica Shumaker:Concerns brought up regarding parking facilities and the
increased flow of traffic and parking on streets during holiday events.
Response: We are aware of our parking constraints and have been exploring to possibility of paving the
gravel area in the back part of the lot, but because it boarders the wetlands and the requirements that
clean water services has we have not been able act on this, but are working with them to find a solution.
We don't anticipate a change in the scheduled use of the building, but honestly we don't know what the
future will hold so it's hard to say what if any increase in traffic will come about.
Question/Concern by Monica Shumaker and Craig Hilo:Concern brought up regarding trespassing and
vandalism. This year(2013)Craig has called the police more than ever...this year has brought an
increase in this type of behavior. How much of the congregation lives in the community.
Response: One of the problems is that people can walk right on through...99%of the people that come
through don't cause trouble. Pastor Kenji monitors the upper lot on a regular basis to make sure people
are not there that shouldn't be. Unfortunately due to the unique makeup of our church the majority of
our congregation does not live in the immediate community(some people drive 1'/2 hours each way to
attend Sunday service). But the great news is that we are in a binding contractual agreement with the
City of Tigard to sell the upper lot,where they are going to turn the land into a city park. With this
action it should help to improve the community,clean up the area,and decrease the amount of through
traffic as there will be a fence constructed that separates the park from JIBC.
Question/Concern by Monica Shumaker:Concern about impact to the wetlands,there is a hydrology
issue with the amount of building that is going on in the community and the water has to have a place to
go. Deer and pheasants are common sightings in the wetlands.
Response: Our construction should not affect the wetlands at all according to the meetings we've had
with the city so far. The city makes sure we adhere to their guidelines have a plan on how we are going
to deal with the water levels that we will be addressed in the impact study. When the city builds the
park on the upper lot,they should be cleaning up some and taking out some of the invasive species.
Question/Concern by Jeff Mimnaugh:Are there plans to add additional lighting to detour some of these
issues? What is the plan and intent that you can share at this point?
Response: Yes, lighting is a good form of security, but can be unwelcomed if placed next to residential
houses. Our intent is to create lighting that offers a measure of security to our building but at the same
time be sensitive to the neighborhoods around us. We will explore lighting options that take into
consideration wildlife in the area as brought up by Monica Shumaker.
Question/Concern by Jeff Mimnaugh: According to the plan in the packet there is going to be a 25 foot
buffer on the west side of the building? Are there plans regarding redoing the fence? This could create
another area where people could come to vandalize property.
Response: Yes,there will be a 25 foot buffer on both the west and south sides. Absolutely we plan on
upgrading the fence,we need to.
Question/Concern by Monica Shumaker: The city wants a 6 foot privacy fence, but we would like a
fence that is half a foot or foot shorter so that we can have a clear view of the parking lot to help?
Response: We would be more than happy with that. That offers another measure of accountability for
the people that come through. We have security cameras placed in certain areas but another solution
would be use a higher quality system in the future.
Question/Concern by Jeff Mimnaugh: How long have you owned the parcel where the new building
will be constructed.
Response: We own the house that sits on the land,and currently one of the elderly members of our
church lives in it. We believe that we purchased the property in June of 2009, but would have to go
back through our records for an exact date.
Question/Concern by Monica Shumaker: There is a heat island effect with asphalt and trees that have
been removed, could you plant trees that have foliage to offer shade and a noise buffer? Would you
consider fruit bearing trees?
Response: One of the requirements of the city that trees or vegetation be planted in the buffer zone.
The city is pretty strict regarding the types of vegetation that goes in, but we can look into it with the
city.
Question/Concern by Jim Long: Why are you going to this design?
Response:There are a variety of reasons on why we decide to go with Sprung Structures. Our need is
now, and prior plans required more time and cost associated with those. This will help us to address our
needs as quickly and most economically as possible.
Question/Concern by Jeff Mimnaugh: Does this fit city code?
Response:Yes it does. There are other churches that have built in Tigard, Gardy Christian School,for
example has a facility by Sprung Structures,so there is a precedence for this in the city.
Question/Concern by Monica Shumaker: Is the structure ecologically sound?
Response:Yes. Construction time is very quick, possibly in 3 weeks depending on design. The insulating
qualities of this structure offer a greater and more consistent level of heating and cooling during the
winter and summer months and this will cut down on the amount of energy used to do so.
Question/Concern by Jeff Mimnaugh/Monica Shumaker/Craig Hilo: Concern regarding having a
basketball court and the sound that could potentially be produced by it? There is only a 25 foot buffer
between his property and the building. How will this increase the number of people that come to the
church and the noise that is produced by them or activities such as basketball?
Response:The noise levels are in our consideration, and is one of the reasons that we decided on
Sprung Structures because of the design and how the acoustics within. Our goal isn't to increase the
size of our congregation, but to meet the needs that we have right now. Certainly,and hopefully,this
will bring more people through our doors but that is not our intent. We do have limited space, but do
see this as a benefit to the community and we are planning on inviting the community in as well. It is
possible that this will create more traffic and parking, but we don't know how many additional people
will come. We are active in other areas such as providing disaster relief to nations around the globe
(Japan and the Philippians)and see the indoor court being used as a staging site for these activities
along with other uses.
Question/Concern by Monica Shumaker/Jim Long: Will the city require you to do street
improvements? Are there any design elements that could be incorporated into the improvements for
traffic calming effects,as a way to detour the street being used as a bypass by commuters? There is a
development going in that possibly will open up Spruce St. all the way...if this happens traffic will really
increase. Spruce St. is not set up that way,could we get your support in trying to encourage the county
and city to not make this change?
Response:Yes,we are required to do some improvements. We hope the city is considering those type
of design cues but that is a little bit outside of our scope. We would be in support of this, already the
intersection is dangerous for our children and their safety is important to us. We were not yet aware
that this was being discussed, but thank you for bringing it to our attention.
Question/Concern by Jeff Mimnaugh: How high would the roof line be? Concerns regarding the added
noise, lighting, potential vandalism, along with views outside of their windows seeing something that
looks like a tent. The community is mixed in terms of architecture, but the design of Sprung does not fit
into the residential community. He loves the church, it is a true blessing to the community and loves the
fact that when he walks up his stairs he sees the steeple.
Response:The peak of the structure is 26 feet high,with 27 feet being the limit. Thank you for your
concerns,they are noted. It would be challenging if we were in your shoes as well. We understand your
concerns.
Question/Concern by Jim Long:What color will it be?
Response:The structure can come in a variety of colors but the exact colors have not been determined
at this point in time.
Question/Concern by Monica Shumaker/Jeff Mimnaugh:What will 7200sgft of space fit? What is your
time frame? When will the conditional use application go in? Your intent is to go forward regardless.
You have a large congregation on a small piece of land, have you considered another place for your
church?
Response:The requirement by the city is to provide a 20ft buffer, but we want to be good neighbors to
those around us,so that is why we chose to expand beyond the requirements and have a 25ft buffer.
Hopefully we will have construction finished by the end of next summer(2014). We will submit for the
conditional use permit after this meeting, possibly in 6-8 weeks,and you will again be notified by the
city when we do. Yes, moving forward is our desire, it's not just a want but a need at this point. We
have considered looking elsewhere many times, but it has never panned out.
Question/Concern by Jim Long: I am the head of the local CPO,would you be willing to share your
meeting notes from today so we can discuss them at our next meeting?
Response:Yes we can share with you,and we will be sending them to the city as well.
Question/Concern by Jeff Mimnaugh: What haven't we asked you about,that you are required to tell
us? We've talked about lighting, wetlands,traffic, noise, building itself, vandalism,what have we not
covered that is required by you in the conditional use permit that you haven't told us? If we think of
questions later on that we didn't ask tonight that we didn't address could we contact you? If you build
something that looks like a tent, it will drive my property down.
Response:We are what some people would call overly honest and are not ones that try to hide things.
If the question is,are we concealing anything tonight that could become issue later on the answer is no.
Some things not covered tonight are be the noise of the AC units in the summer time,and right before
this meeting we were discussing how to create a noise buffer for these to help in this area. We want to
do everything possible to do be good neighbors. You can contact us if further questions come up.
End time:8:04pm
City of Tigard
TIGARD Request for 500' Property Owner Mailing Labels
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION IS VALID FOR 3 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF YOUR REQUEST.
Contact Staff Member Joe Patton, 503-718-2714 or joepatigard-or.gov
NAME OF YOUR PROJECT: Japanese International Baptist Church Multi-purpose Bldg
TIGARD STAFF PLANNER YOU ARE WORKING WITH: Agnes Kowacz
PLEASE INDICATE ALL MAP&TAX LOT NUMBERS (i.e. 1S134AB,Tax Lot 00100)THAT ARE INCLUDED IN
YOUR PROJECT OR THE ADDRESSES FOR ALL PROJECT PARCELS BELOW (If more than one(1)tax lot or if
the parcel has no address,you must separately identify each tax lot associated with the project.)
8500 SW Spruce St, 1S135AD02700&1S136CB4400
ONLY 1 SET OF LABELS WILL BE PROVIDED AT THIS TIME FOR HOLDING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD
MEETING. After submitting your land use application to the City,and the project planner has reviewed your application for
completeness,you will be notified by means of a completeness review letter to obtain your 2 final sets of labels. IF YOU
HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED BY PLANNING TO OBTAIN YOUR LABELS,PLEASE INDICATE BELOW THAT
YOU NEED 2 SETS OF LABELS.
0 Completeness Letter Received Indicating 2 Sets of Envelopes w/Affixed Address Labels Required
The 2 final sets of labels need to be placed on envelopes (no self-adhesive envelopes please)with first class letter-rate
postage on the envelopes in the form of postage stamps (no metered envelopes and no return address) and resubmitted to
the City for the purpose of providing notice to property owners of the proposed land use application and the decision. The 2
sets of envelopes must be kept separate. The person listed below will be called to pick up and pay for the labels when they are
ready.
NAME OF CONTACT PERSON: Kenji Yokoi PHONE: 503.705.5213
NAME OF COMPANY:„Japanese International Baptist Church EMAIL: kenyokoy@gmail.com
r
This request can be sent by e-mail,US mail,or hand delivered to the City of Tigard. Please allow a 2-day minimum for
processing requests. Upon completion of your request,the contact person listed will be called to pick up their request that will
be placed in"Will Call"by the company name (or by the contact person's last name if no company)at the front counter in the
Permit Center.
The cost of processing your request must be paid at the time of pick up,as exact cost cannot be pre-determined.
PLEASE NOTE:
FOR REASONS OF ACCURACY, ONLY ORIGINAL MAILING LABELS PROVIDED BY THE CITY VS.
RE-TYPED MAILING LABELS WILL BE ACCEPTED.
Cost Description: 3oO Q4,43LA ,R@.5
$11 to generate the mailing list,plus $2 per sheet for printing the list onto labels (20 addresses per sheet). Then,multiply the cost
to print one set of labels by the number of sets requested.
-EXAMPLE- -COST FOR THIS REQUEST -
4 sheets of labels x$2/sheet=$8.00 x 2 sets= $16.00 7 sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet= S 14 x 2 sets= 28
1 sheets of labels x$2/sheet for interested parties x 2 sets= $ 4.00 sheet(s)of labels x$2/sheet for interested parties=S 4 x 2 sets= S
GENERATE LIST = $11.00 GENERATE LIST = $11.00
TOTAL. = $31.00 'I'O'1'AL =$ 47.00
C:\0 se rs\joep.COTNT\Desktop\Delete\500 foot property owner_mailing_labels_req.d ocx
I j _
W
El .11
—rrnxtrmzeELENA LLN l! ; OAK sr ' o ' Area Notified (500 Ft)
I Z
00 E•■u+, Japanese International Baptist Churr
ILI EN ›p a, Multi-purpose Bldg
��F�_ �� - _; 8500 SW Spruce St
/ I c 1S136CB04400
�.��� 44'�, Kenji Yokoi
c „
m 11111111111111111 Ja Japanese
p e International Baptist Chur
kligl
+I EST , P: 503.705.5213
1_ II!IIE kenyokoyRgmail.com
—,
J _
Asn �
lir . , i
SPRUCEST .■ee
= . ' .,__ •• ®IM
Subject Site
t.
W =___ ! .l�
> Notification Area
If11
• � ' ���� M���i� �� I �— � � II THORN ST
:ter:_,� ��! ���.� �� Ai
1111111
1= — . �Ir �IIIIII�� mow 'Iltt�� ��i■ num Er. Immem
MMEIMMINNIMMilm Ma= _
IIM flllllll�� �`m Illll�l•11111 —;mom�� =II INIIII IIIII�r �� .. i� Property owner information is valid
mg mismiame
�� �e� ■ _ J for 3 months from the date printed on
mui—1 . Ino imimiumr ...
�� this ma
1111/11
allill
III �i ��11 P.
Ell111111•1111 II/ am
lir
.............>
Mallna -��— ��� ?II
MIME 0
__,,,,,.. _,
_„„_,,.... co _,...„„_„„...._== ...
•11111111111111MOL'i —I IIIIIIIIIINIMINIMI //M1/1M EMMEN---- 11111•11111•10,1•11 in\ Map Printed:23SeP-Sep
' Min
=� _ �'--> ~- N Information on nis map rea,general ieeauon
..�����Q rl orcr•na znowa be v.,?ma win ue D...IOPm.ne
W M.
p 00- s.�w�..LNINon
---. 14R
411111 III
-F •■ N ' iron DATAIS DERIVEDY,OML OR COIALETHE CITYSSO AYOFT
F TIGARD
MAKES NOT WARRANN REPRESENTATION,OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE
_ CONTENT.ACCURACY,TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE
ITY OF
DATA INFORMATION
NHEREIN.PROVIDED
THE REGARDLESS
LESS OF HOW ASSUME NO
- USABILITY PR VID ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS.OR ID SHALL ACIES IN THE
Q INFOR MOTION PROVIDED OMISSIONS,
O S,O IN CCURACIE O.
Ali
. � I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
IIIIIIII rim A Place to CaliHome"
•
,t PFAFFLE 5T . I Vas MAPS
Tigard
oSVV Hall
P VasMAPS 7TigaNN
5d,OR 97 123
Blvd !
i \ �I EMI wwwligard-or gov I�IOAHD
1S136CB03900 1S136CB00502
8340 LLC ALTON,DONALD E KATHLEEN
BY KATI STROM,MARTA 8318 SW SPRUCE
3601 SW RIVER PKWY#421 PORTLAND OR 97223
PORTLAND OR 97239
1S136BC01900 1S136CB04900
ALZNER-LANG,VIRGINIA M AMOS,GRACE B
10730 SW 85TH AVE 10860 SW 83RD AVE
PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S136CB05000 1S135AD04200
ANDERSON,JOHN G ANDRE,ALDEN A&CARRIE J
10890 SW 83RD 1005 SE 23RD ST
TIGARD OR 97223 TROUTDALE OR 97060
1S136CB00211 1S135AD05100
ANDRE,CHARLES M&DONNA D BAJRACHARYA,PRADEEP&KUSUMABAT
10900 SW 82ND AVE 10705 SW SITKA CT
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
multiple: 1S135DA00300 to 1S135DA00400 1S135AD02300
BERGMANN FAMILY TRUST BILLYE MAXINE LLC,THE
BY BERGMANN,KENNETH L&DONNA J TR 13500 SW PACIFIC HWY#499
10726 SW 63RD PL TIGARD OR 97223
PORTLAND OR 97219
1S135AD03200 1S136BCO2201
BOSTIOG,BENJAMIN&VOICHITA L BOURKE,ANDREW F
11040 SW HALL BLVD 10723 SW 82ND AVE
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S135AD02100 1S136CB03800
BOURKE,ELSA BRADLEY,PAULINE L
10825 SW HALL BLVD 11055 SW 83RD AVE
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S136CB04700 1S135AD06300
BROCKWAY,CHARLES W BROYLES,JANIE S
10825 SW 83RD AVE 8555 SW JOELLE CT
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S135AD05300 1S135AD00901
CALLAHAN,MICHAEL P CAMPBELL,SCOTT
10775 SW SITKA CT 10675 SW HALL BLVD
TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223
1S136CB04300 1S136CB10600
CARDEN,JO CARPENTER,ERIC R&KATHRYN L
10935 SW 83RD AVE 11172 SW 84TH AVE
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S135AD05700 1S136CB05100
CASTILLO,MARIA H CASTRILLON,DWAYNE&HEATHER
8535 SW SPRUCE ST 10920 SW 83RD AVE
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S135AD03700 1S135AD00100
CHING,KEALII K COPELAND,RACHEL
2803 SW HUME CT 8504 SW PINE ST
PORTLAND OR 97219 TIGARD OR 97223
1S136BC01601 1S136CB01500
CUNDIFF,FRED LOHR&BERNICE JOY CURTIS,GENE E&NANCY J
8250 SW PINE ST 11125 SW 82ND
PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S136CB00500 1S135AD03400& 1S135AD01000
DAVENPORT,DOUGLAS&ROBERTA DAVIS,EUGENE REVOCABLE LIVING T
8418 SW SPRUCE ST DAVIS,GENE L
PORTLAND OR 97223 10875 SW 89TH AVE
TIGARD OR 97223
1S136CB05500 1S136CB00213
DEVLIN,CHAD W&CHRISTINA L DICKINSON,ANTHONY K&TRACIE N
11050 SW 83RD AVE 10840 SW 82ND AVE
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S136CB05300 1S135AD00200
EKERSON,MICHAEL E FAR PROPERTIES LLC
10980 SW 83RD AVE BY FRANCE,RICHARD A MANAGER
TIGARD OR 97223 12534 SW 56TH CT
PORTLAND OR 97219
1S136CB04100 1S136BC03400
FIELD,CRAIG&MICHELLE FIELDS,PATRICIA HELEN REVOCABLE
8365 SW STEVE ST 8400 SW PINE ST
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
multiple: 1S135DA00500 to 1S136CB00700 1S136BC01701
GATEHOUSE LLC GEVURTZ,BERNICE R REVOC LT&
6310 SW BURLINGAME AVE LYNCH,JOSHUA B
PORTLAND OR 97239 1918 INDIAN FRAIL
LAKE OSWEGO OR 97035
1S136CB08000 1S136BCO2200
GOODMAN,JOSHUA ALAN&BETHANY L GRABLER,GARY F
8192 SW STEVE ST PETERSON,DEBRA J
TIGARD OR 97223 8285 SW SPRUCE ST
PORTLAND OR 97223
1S136CB00218 1S136CB05600
GREIG,EMORY J JR&JANET M JOIN HANFORD,JERRY S&DEBORAH L
REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 14925 SW HAWK RIDGE RD
19040 SW OLSON AVE TIGARD OR 97224
LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034
1S136CB03400 1S136CB01400
HANSEN,LAURIE K HARLESS,RONALD LYLE
11175 SW 83RD AVE 11095 SW 82ND
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S135AD04500 1S136CB05800
HART,BRYAN W&CAMESHA L HEYDENRYCH,NICHOLAS ADRIAN
8542 SW LUCILLE CT 11140 SW 83RD AVE
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S135AA07900 1S136BCO2101
HUNT,ANDREW N ILER,SHAUNA RAE
8585 SW PINE ST 8305 SW SPRUCE ST
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S136CB04400 1S135AD03900
JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST C JOHANSEN,REBECCA M
8500 SW SPRUCE ST 8595 SW LUCILLE CT
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S136CB00215 1S135AD06200
JONES,ERIC M&ANGELA K KARIMOV,JAVDAT
10835 SW 82ND AVE 8565 SW JOELLE CT
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S135DA02402 1S136CB03300
KAULUWAI CORPORATION KETJ FY,JIM D&STACY L
2445-A MAKIKI HEIGHTS DRIVE 11205 SW 83RD AVE
HONOLULU HI 96822 TIGARD OR 97223
1S135AA03200 1S136CB04000
KERSEY,DEDE A KING,CANDACE
8509 SW PINE ST 8370 SW STEVE ST
PORTLAND OR 97233 TIGARD OR 97223
1S136BC01300 1S136CB05200
KOCH,PATRICK L&GRACIA K KOLAROVA,STANIMIR V&GALIA D
8475 SW PINE ST 10950 SW 83RD AVE
PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S135DA02400 multiple: 1S136CB00219 to 1S136CB00221
KRAMER,RICHARD D KRIETZ,KENNETH F TRUST
11035 SW HALL 2805 NE 174TH AVE
TIGARD OR 97223 VANCOUVER WA 98682
1S136CB05400 1S135AA03201
LAFFERRIERE,GERARDO&BEATRIZ LAWRENCE,DAVID&LIANE
11020 SW 83RD AVE 8535 SW PINE ST
TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223
1S135DA02401 1S136BCO2202
LEMUS,MARL\H LEVIN,CLARE E
11075 SW HALL BLVD 10715 SW 82ND AVE
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S136CB00401 1S135AD00400
LIDINGTON,STEFAN LOWE,ERIC&JOAN
13300 SW VILLAGE GLENN DR 10670 SW HALL BLVD
TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223
mu1tip1e: 1S135AD04800 to 1S135AD05000 1S136CB01300
LUKE-DORF,INC MAGENHEIMER,JOEL R&SUE A
10313 SW 69TH AVE 11065 SW 82ND AVE
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S135AD05200 1S136CB00217
MAR,PAUL Y MCCAMONT,JOHN&DOROTHY
10735 SW SITKA CT 10895 SW 82ND AVE
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S136BC03300 1S135AD02000& 1S135AD02001
MELBY,GARY P&DOROTHY A MILLER,RANDALL D&MILLER,DEBORAH LEIGH&
8380 SW PINE ST MILLER,GREGORY L ET AL
TIGARD OR 97223 8808 SW SPRUCE ST
PORTLAND OR 97223
1S135AD06400 1S135AD05500
MIMNAUGH,R JEFFRY&NAOMI MONKUS,COREY&NICOLE
8545 SW JOELLE CT 10760 SW SITKA CT
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S135AD01100 1S136CB05700
MOON,BRETT A&SHERRIE A MOORE,CARLA
8807 SW SPRUCE MOORE,TRACEY DALE ESTATE OF
TIGARD OR 97223 11110 SW 83RD
TIGARD OR 97223
1S136CB01600 1S135AD04600
MORTON,ALISHA K MUNOZ,LARRY AVALOS&
11155 SW 82ND AVE BARBARA ANN
TIGARD OR 97223 8580 SW LUCILLE CT
TIGARD OR 97223
1S136CB04500 1S136CB05900
NEWMAN,NORMAN MAX NGUYEN,LUONG D
10885 SW 83RD PHAM,LOAN T
TIGARD OR 97223 352 SE 69TH AVE
HITJ SBORO OR 97123
1S135AD04300 1S136CB00504
NICHOLS,ERIC NORRIS,CHARLENE K&TIMOTHY L
HANSON,KEELY 8380 SW SPRUCE ST
8513 SW LUCILLE CT PORTLAND OR 97223
TIGARD OR 97223
1 S136CB03700 1S135AD04400
NURMIKKO,MICHAEL G&BARBARA J ONKKA,MATTHEW P
11085 SW 83RD AVE 8516 SW LUCIJ.T.F CT
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S135AD05900 1S136BCO2000
OREGON DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION OTT,ROGER M&SHARON L
FINANCIAL SERVICES 8321 SW SPRUCE ST
355 CAPITOL ST NE,RM 434 TIGARD OR 97223
SALEM OR 97301
1S135DA00200 1S135DA00100
PECK,CHRISTOPHER D& PECK,WALTER D&ELIZABETH M
PECK RHONDA L PO BOX 23789
11120 SW HALL BLVD PORTLAND OR 97223
TIGARD OR 97223
1S136CB08100 1S135AD00301
PICKARD,JOHN ROBERT&LONNIE JO PINE STREET LAND TRUST
8216 SW STEVE ST PMB 45
TIGARD OR 97223 1310 NW STATE AVE
CHEHALIS WA 98532
1S136CB00220 1S135AD00300
PINEDA,CRISTOBAL&MARIA R6D2 HOLDINGS LLC
10985 SW 82ND AVE PO BOX 766
TIGARD OR 97223 NAPAVINE WA 98565
1S135AD03500 1S136CB10500
RAYBORN,RICK A REGMI,ANUJ
8735 SW SPRUCE ST PAUDYAL,SUNITA
TIGARD OR 97223 11194 SW 84TH AVE
TIGARD OR 97223
multiple: 1S135AD04000 to 1S135AD04100 1S136CB08200
REVILO LLC ROBLES,GLENN
BY OLIVER,J SCOTT 8240 SW STEVE ST
1930 NW CEDAR RIDGE DR TIGARD OR 97223
PORTLAND OR 97229
1S135AA03400 1S136CB03500
ROSE,DORIS M ROTARU,CORNEL
10580 SW HALL BLVD 11145 SW 83RD AVE
PORTLAND OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S136CB04401 1S136CB06000
ROYCE,WILLIA S SAS HOLDINGS LLC
MARTINELLI,IDA M PO BOX 231213
10905 SW 83RD AVE TIGARD OR 97281
TIGARD OR 97223
1S135AD06000 1S135AD02800
SCHABER,JASON T& SCHROEDER,LEO S
SCI-IWEITZ,JOY L 8540 SW SPRUCE ST
8585 SW JOET.T.F CT PORTLAND OR 97223
TIGARD OR 97223
1S136CB00214 1S136BCO2100
SCHULZ,JOSEPH D&CYNTHIA C SHELLSHEAR,DAVID A&DEBBIE J
11222 SW 84TH AVE 8311 SW SPRUCE ST
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S135AD02500 to 1S135AD02502 1S136CB00501
SHERWOOD,LARRY&KATHLEEN REV T SHUMAKER,MERLE LEEROY AND
BY SHERWOOD,LARRY D&KATHLEEN L T BARBARA
10432 SW MORATOC DR 8460 SW SPRUCE ST
TUALATIN OR 97062 PORTLAND OR 97223
1S135AD05400 1S136CB03600
SISK,KERRY S SKOFF,MATTHEW J
10780 SW SITKA CT 11115 SW 83RD
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S136BC01700 1S135AA07800
SMITH,CAROLYN A&LAPP,KEVIN 0& SMITH,GREG F
SMITH,BONITA S 4707 SW MAPLEWOOD RD
8310 SW PINE ST PORTLAND OR 97219
PORTLAND OR 97223
1S135AD02900 1S136CB00216
SOUD,AMY KYUNGMI STEWART,MELISSA&MICHAEL
SOUD,FAEZ 10865 SW 82ND AVE
8875 PIPPEN LN TIGARD OR 97223
PORTLAND OR 97223
1S135AD00800 1S135AD03300
STORMONT,PATRICIA JO SUSI,MARIA C
10685 SW 85TH AVE 10021 SW 35TH AVE
TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97219
1S135AD06100 1S135AD05600
TANZI,ANTHONY JR THOMAS,MICHELLE
8575 SW JOELLE CT 10730 SW SITKA CT
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S136BC03500 1S136CB11000& 1S136CB04402
TIDYMAN,JOAN S TIGARD,CITY OF
10690 SW 85TH AVE 13125 SW HALL BLVD
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
1S135AD01702 1S135AD00600
TOZER LIVING TRUST TREAT,MICHAEL J
8770 SW THORN 8515 SW SPRUCE ST
TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223
1S135AD00700 1S135AD00900
TUMAY CORPORATION TYCER,ANTHONY LEWIS
11920 SW PACIFIC HWY 10655 SW HALL BLVD
TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223
The following labels list interested persons who requested to DON&DOROTHY ERDT
be copied on notices re:development taking place in Tigard. 13760 SW 121ST AVENUE
TIGARD,OR 97223
BARRY ALBERTSON VANESSA FOS 1'ER
15445 SW 150TH AVE 13085 SW HOWARD DR
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223
SUSAN BEILKE MONA KNAPP
11755 SW 114TH PLACE 9600 SW FREWING STREET
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
ELLEN BEILS 1'EIN BEVERLY FROUDE
14630 SW 139TH AVE 12200 SW BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
HEIDI BRENNEMAN NAOMI GALLUCCI
11680 SW TIGARD DRIVE 11285 SW 78TH AVENUE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
GRETCHEN BUEHNER VICTOR DEFILIPPIS
13249 SW 136TH PLACE 13892 SW BRAYDON CT
TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97224
•
REX CAFFALL KEVIN HOGAN
13205 SW VILLAGE GLENN 14357 SW 133RD AVENUE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
CAROL KRAGER CITY RECORDS HAROLD AND RUTH HOWLAND
CITY OF TIGARD 13145 SW BENISH
13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
DAYLE D.&EVELYN O.BEACH PATRICIA KEERINS
11530 SW 72ND AVENUE 12195 SW 121sT AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
PLANNING COMMISSION(ALT)JOHN GOODHOUSE DAVID KIMMEL
9345 SW MOUNTAIN VIEW LANE 1335 SW 66TH SUITE 201
TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97225
1:\CURPLN\Setup-Land Use Files\LABELS\CIT Labels Citywidc.docx Last Update:09 0814 Page 1 of 2
ALEXANDER CRAGHEAD JULIE RUSSELL,CPO 4B CHAIR
12205 SW HALL BOUT.FVARD 12662 SW TERRAVIEW DRIVE
TIGARD,OR 97223-6210 TIGARD,OR 97224
GENE MILDREN BRAD SPRING
MILDREN DESIGN GROUP 7555 SW SPRUCE STREET
7650 SW BEVEL:AND ST,STE 120 TIGARD,OR 97223
TIGARD,OR 97223
NATHAN AND ANN MURDOCK CHARLIE AND LARIE STALZER
7415 SW SPRUCE STREET 14781 SW JULIET TERRACE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
PATTY NEWTH ROSS SUNDBERG
12180 SW MERESTONE COURT 16382 SW 104TH AVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
TODD HARDING&BLAKE HERING JR. NEAL BROWN.GRI
NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON MEADOWS INC REALTORS
121 SW MORRISON,SUITE 200 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA STREET
PORTLAND,OR 97204 TIGARD,OR 97223
GLENNA THOMPSON DAVID WALSH
13676 SW HALL BLVD UNIT 2 10236 SW STUART COURT
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
SUE RORMAN BRIAN WEGENER
11250 SW 82ND AVE 9830 SW KIMBERLY DRIVE
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97224
LISA HAMILTON CPO 4B VICE CHAIR CAROL RENAUD-WACO CPO NEWSLE II ER COORD.
13565 SW BEEF BEND ROAD OSU EXT.SVC-CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACULTY
TIGARD,OR 97224 155 NORTH 1ST AVENUE SUITE 200 MS48
HILTSBORO,OR 97124
JULIE RUSSELL CHAIR CPO 4B CHAIR JIM LONG,CHAIR,CPO 4M
16200 SW PACIFIC HWY SUITE H BOX 242 10730 SW 72ND AVE
TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97223
I:\CURPLN\Setup-land Use Files\LABELS\CIT Labels Citywidc.docx Last Update:09 08 14 Page 2 of 2
CleanWaterr Services
0„, cool mihncnl i. cl.:r,. CWS File Number14-002134
Service Provider Letter 14-002134
This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in accordance
with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R&O 07-20).
Jurisdiction: Washington County Review Type: No Impact
Site Address 8512 SW Spruce ST SPL Issue Date: August 29,2014
/Location: Tigard, OR 97223 SPL Expiration Date: August 28,2016
Applicant Information: Owner Information:
Name Name
JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST
Company CHURCH Company CHURCH
8500 SW SPRUCE ST 8500 SW SPRUCE ST
Address Address
TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223
Phone/Fax Phone/Fax
E-mail: E-mail:
Tax lot ID Development Activity
1S136CB04400 Multi-Purpose Building
Pre-Development Site Conditions: Post Development Site Conditions:
Sensitive Area Present: e I On-Site X Off-Site Sensitive Area Present: X On-Site X Off-Site
Vegetated Corridor Width: Variable Vegetated Corridor Width: Variable
Vegetated Corridor Condition:
Enhancement of Remaining
Vegetated Corridor Required: X Square Footage to be enhanced: 14,095
Encroachments into Pre-Development Vegetated Corridor:
Type and location of Encroachment: Square Footage:
None
0
Mitigation Requirements:
Type/Location Sq. Ft./Ratio/Cost
No Mitigation Requirements 0
7 Conditions Attached lid Development Figures Attached(4) Planting Plan Attached Geotech Report Required
This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality
sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property.
Page 1 of
14-002134
CWS File Number
In order to comply with Clean Water Services water quality protection
requirements the project must comply with the following conditions:
1. No structures,development, construction activities,gardens, lawns, application of chemicals,
uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental
Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted
within the sensitive area or Vegetated Corridor which may negatively impact water quality,
except those allowed in R&O 07-20, Chapter 3.
2. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction the Vegetated Corridor and water quality
sensitive areas shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During
construction the Vegetated Corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by
R&O 07-20, Section 3.06.1 and per approved plans.
3. If there is any activity within the sensitive area,the applicant shall gain authorization for
the project from the Oregon Department of State Lands(DSL) and US Army Corps of
Engineers (USAGE). The applicant shall provide Clean Water Services or its designee
(appropriate city)with copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization permits.
4. An approved Oregon Department of Forestry Notification is required for one or more trees
harvested for sale,trade, or barter, on any non-federal lands within the State of Oregon.
5. Prior to ground disturbance an erosion control permit is required. Appropriate Best
Management Practices (BMP's)for Erosion Control, in accordance with Clean Water
Services'Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual, shall
be used prior to,during, and following earth disturbing activities.
6. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from Clean Water Services or its
designee is required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4.B.
7. Activities located within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 5.10.
8. Removal of native, woody vegetation shall be limited to the greatest extent practicable.
9. The water quality swale shall be planted with Clean Water Services approved native
species, and designed to blend into the natural surroundings.
10. Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by
the City and Clean Water Services,the applicant shall provide updated drawings, and if
necessary, obtain a revised Service Provider Letter.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
11. The Vegetated Corridor width for sensitive areas within the project site shall be measured
horizontally from the delineated boundary of the sensitive area.
12. For Vegetated Corridors up to 50 feet wide, the applicant shall enhance the entire Vegetated
Corridor to meet or exceed good corridor condition as defined in R&O 07-20, Section 3.14.2,
Table 3-3.
13. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction, the applicant shall provide Clean Water
Services with a Vegetated Corridor enhancement/restoration plan. Enhancement/restoration of
the Vegetated Corridor shall be provided in accordance with R&O 07-20,Appendix A, and shall
include planting specifications for all Vegetated Corridor, including any cleared areas larger
than 25 square feet in Vegetated Corridor rated ""good.""
14. Prior to installation of plant materials, all invasive vegetation within the Vegetated Corridor shall
be removed per methods described in Clean Water Services' Integrated Pest Management
Plan. During removal of invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to existing
native tree and shrub species.
15. The City or Clean Water Services shall be notified 72 hours prior to the start and completion of
enhancement/restoration activities. Enhancement/restoration activities shall comply with the
guidelines provided in Landscape Requirements(R&0 07-20, Appendix A).
Page 2 of 7
F
14.002134
CWS File Number
16. Maintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 2.11.2.
If at any time during the warranty period the landscaping falls below the 80% survival
level,the owner shall reinstall all deficient planting at the next appropriate planting
opportunity and the two-year maintenance period shall begin again from the date of
replanting.
17. Performance assurances for the Vegetated Corridor shall comply with R&O 07-20,
Section 2.06.2.
18. Clean Water Services shall require an easement over the Vegetated Corridor conveying
storm and surface water management to Clean Water Services that would prevent the
owner of the Vegetated Corridor from activities and uses inconsistent with the purpose
of the corridor and any easements therein.
FINAL PLANS
19. Final construction plans shall include landscape plans. In the details section of the plans,
a description of the methods for removal and control of exotic species, location, distribution,
condition and size of plantings, existing plants and trees to be preserved, and installation
methods for plant materials is required. Plantings shall be tagged for dormant season
identification and shall remain on plant material after planting for monitoring purposes.
20. A Maintenance Plan shall be included on final plans including methods, responsible party
contact information, and dates(minimum two times per year, by June 1 and September 30).
21. Final construction plans shall clearly depict the location and dimensions of the sensitive
area and the Vegetated Corridor(indicating good, marginal, or degraded condition).
Sensitive area boundaries shall be marked in the field.
22. Protection of the Vegetated Corridors and associated sensitive areas shall be provided by the
installation of signage between the development and the outer limits of the Vegetated
Corridors. Signage details to be included on final construction plans.
This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS-approved site plan is attached.
Please call (503) 681-3653 with any questions.
Amber Wierck
Environmental Plan Review
Attachments (4)
Page 3 0'7
14-002134
CWS File Number
Legend tli
1cP
, ON Sensitive Area, Wetlands: 33,977 sq. ft.
3-
s
� . Sensitive Area, Perennial Creek: 1,742 sq. ft.
m
o ❑ Vegetated Corridors: 8,732 sq. ft.
Marginal Vegetated Corridors: 5,363 sq. ft.
n
r
ARiparian Forest Planting Zone: 2,155 sq. ft.
AUpland Forest Planting Zone: 11,940 sq. ft.
Wetland boundary accuracy ±1 meter based on poet-processed
accuracy provided by the manufacturer.
+ + + + - Aboo 1 aaN
+ + + + + + = f ' 0l S
SF
+ + + + + + + + Conafructec' form Wafer
++++++++++++++ +++ .+ Pond
— + ++++++++++++++ ^, PI/4y et. I4h O - .�ltGl'SLDIt77
+ + + + + + + PRO SE 1 �
oa + + + + + + + Q E ��R JT kp /}S UC.
attend ++- + ++++ ®! : H: T, 4
.ontinues - - - 1 + + 4 + + " *' a„.,+
site \ • + +. + + + + te -0 r' -.` 4-, + I
PLANT CDNN �
UNItr. UPLAND F01L51 + + 4 } +.,, � 4 4 f
Common(Sc10.W/k Moro) Piano Iurnnp coon lbw \ 4 + +� r/
Category Container SIN; 94 9* a2Mxr \ + +' + .0 V + + ♦ ,l,. 1
nd Oder(.Iw,r,.,n Irr ban goal LN,a M \ �) -Dr ±. + Y
O 4e1
,0 wa(.,r.m.woebnun) tt f wnan .a9N w V c x r '•: �� 0
wawa.n,IHrs peen.)
.)gr..nra.rp tot row not .1.9N Ni 7
vim 0.rir(n Ace ynMNry bee I NMn .I0,N NI s
vim maple(.nr c:rtMe m) ebrW bOn gaol Ogle ,n \ \
n,q0F(No ru•dgcubr) .Irrvb I Celdn In&N )0 \
n▪daeldnMrry(Se.'rbu✓,mc.mn.a) ,nrvb Mn reel Nog!. 30 \ \
n •0ny a rmgd(Fbn.oshri".n) nru! r mot S. \ 0.
Jgia 0 1
SOW-hp,(u.n...Mpr..eo.o) .a.b ban nol duel., III \ \\
bow-hip,o..(P.,.OI^r^o,.vat na,n Mn..a dud., too \ e
M
.word Inn(P.4, n.n .m.Mm M 1 .n,.e 1 p. ^ .a.n, ea \` — — - O I
Colxoma boor(fromr.0mM lit q pro. ..w brood<0n 111 b
blue.Nd-no(c4moa plove.n) 910.
' nu Vaedem IDlIS
N — —
PLAN1 CONONITT :RIPARIAN DOOM Ire
Onpen a n(o..lws b.m,M) Ire. I .mn. wry. w a
rN earn(AA..rube.) Imben row 0.02 ]O 0,
,.d-a.a,dogwood CC.mu,.era..) .nnrb pan net Ilu.l.r 00
In1Mn Pdm(Or go,:brnW) .rub ear.not .lu.ly ea
P.clla.1n.boM1(Pn.,natop,,rophba) .Ivub I.n nal On.. ,0
LnY(smpMrkaryar.0.) shrub ben n cw•1., Oa
.M4O0..4 2(Con,.bnrpb) OW; 4'
'..w mo. 200
loll a re np....(1p .M brobre) One2 u•. boodco.l 0.S a
.pre...iv.*(40.M.,embl
w . Oa) 0022 .
lea...ne- ee.(d4. .. ) 4,... ..d w lbbd0o.l agoWOt107d�Exlends�Of}sf}e
nenb '.
SOURCE: GPS wetland boundary survey, TSI, 2007. I I
VEGETATED CORRIDOR ENHANCEMENT PLAN PROPOSED I
Terra Science, Inc. FOR THE JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL PLANTINGS D
Soil, Water, & Wetland Consultants BAPTIST CHURCH DEVELOPMENT
Tigard, Washington County, Oregon5 F. lq•815113I4
GRAPHIC SCALE CC �Approved n
m p °° EIS51atercS 2
�� rvkes�
1 0
m en N 40 1 I e. August 2014 Rog ,t\SO !lrl1�' y iie _
,r rt i,r?i.ttME'.'Jr II sc. 4
Page 4 a 7
IT AINO M3IA311 HOI ANWNINII3Nd 1,j"T'i ..sr -k' NV
ZD .,n WAS LC $gw0 r�A8 r - ",
w1WS 3RR.3M
_ J33tl153�I1Hd9 AA6 '^31nTC'141iN 7"N021 rv3ti� •
I L
seaniag Ia�eM Il��l'J 3
I1 a.. "" penaiddy a I
,, "" -"T, -- Ifi41L�'fiI 'Or 319 ylw 9. -.0 `'oosq, `� ^ CAS RISER
Cat
}I
Z ' e m
_ \ NOON/1'12"W 2206' 1 I
$$ m 11 I-I
t i ,a113nomal
p IQ 33ess flaw
M Go
I y_ ^ 9-, W ; V O ✓ ,„ ,
...
N , C W3J -__
3311,2
wo3xsnm.a.ert '� °V• / misavr/us
/ ,,
IO a PO RIS010U A MI 01 N I ILLINlfl iota.cdli
`d___._-_l-:...1�. N- I/ &MO rnMa06311s7,o'Ir _ I m I >MOM ZINSI NOD
I ___ I a _ ' I I 0/olslx33e0u3a
$ I r
NDD"1q'31"-',, 524.0T I LOT LIME TO OE REMOVED rli, `
I.4
• r� r )j 1 1
Col UHYll3B / . \
Lv_
6 W
y �(11 rO •
W \$ z oaza 3 3n /
4
lir��� % o , I I.�-,_.,.I - ��ap ��...... soD+SAS"§�€ 78,43' "-, r _
1 f 1 I , 1 , I i I +tnl6q N, I �� VW .i 3,VH158MS
a01, / // --•0 na wav 3�R.3a3n�``4. -I ,
m �m1I S r I In MMIn 3L3 H ,/�
a � n f . Y 1 CO I j II/
Y E J.' I. r i j i
4yp it
A ) ,/
I II " I m 94\ i MiG ; _1L { L 1 J L 1 JL i t_.._J__� 1 : iI � i , .� !_ `L'•� ,S J W S. t4W4m , 600"12'3B"W 274.72' 3 AE ,OE
<0W `ir, 61
Al i
\\\ n ooyo t
1 V3 ✓p y mJ.
,
I
OE I Z00-01,egatnN NIA SMD ,'I,,`umpw",n,mU
sa3I.1IaSeEueat'J
a
14402100
CM NNE Number
i �...».
o E € ii lr \ yT
30' 3 / Nuo'k'''' 1::::( � E E E €.E E r .d.° E !-��ti•,1�- d[� W
/ � y a �- E L
L/ -- "
SWB5ITIAVE • i 5 ' I -rah I I II t_i I-I _ i�;I , .
r
I."N gg' o }}�j��(�Q����Vp
�y I �" wR19gr�_1p. \ )jy."� CORIII0Of� H
Rail.
rl•, 1ii :
""10 -ram RnAwrt...w .wig:,..—_ _ . _ /1/
A -I
, , - ffH190911 TMIB.I--- 6,�g / " r.r - _ ^ \ ' • tia
W rfL.3 I/,
J �x�
�r \ e a: I J
TaraeNn )c ±m w ao.b ' a' / ggrrI, E' /
.�_� ThEE 7O� 1 g
Me_ fT+fl
�`l k rw fAlsm LU'•f TO J e mmanormsroroo ..�u_.
N. 0w L9U0 , n _
mr
E I ° Et iBNE- �I
I} •'4• W ' 11 1. / E; f 't" "4_
y ` TaTO ea gip _
�' - « E .AAAAAAA�V i
L _ 12
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 11 OU
_ �'>q�se�i...r..
4 �\��1111 -4' -- - .....•... I _. ers E O I
•p j a — ,..,., I Cus fl Le Vo. 14 a021iY E 7 yl
13'""" I I i 11 • s'1""""w e� APPrO1'gd W O
�'� rr Glean W8lBf$p1YIC8E B1 aw
may n1�� C3
" _... ...e.m......1,
EROSION MCY[MION AND SLOrNFMT CONTROL NOTE .ate
r�--„ ....wn...osowOvmn.....o0NamN0N:,,,,„,ow.o.m,,,,,, b4"rf"
n M •ARY FOR ,piq m
nm`•""•'w,Eulw•"v."m�iw"`sau`w.w�iN"�'. arz""�'�::•n::w�.,.`�"•�'""me,.,.m INLET PROTECTION DETAIL amweMfeNce o6rNL PRELIMINARY REVIEW ONLY 11
valve a oI T
1
t
I.
I-00t110
Ms FIM Nuw•u
3 1 if \ PST
1a i € - ;f \\ 1.
I I lilt 4 i zo
11 „� .�.
1144 5 1 i � R 9
39 1 301 Yi
- ' j a S
R �� I �� 1 T 7 l Krx rf�� j 0
" 1 `I:;1� 1 _ I */`:ram Y � � Fje�
i '1f li r wf 0 T uvl-w.YSR! / c &: a
I i .51'UIIIYCNCN KAI, iYW'9111 NM/ / .1 1 n 6 S
SW asTR AVE d _,' .... �� :v j t ' /
1'
JEI
i1' ''y `\\ Ar �. \•• �{. Vg.ETATEO $Y.,•. of
'\ G 'I .V \,. �� \ \ i3 \ \1 7\ CORFI000. _6ii 7
/"' f-4 I Ji` =read" \ \. .n-.0 - wETIAMo w
,h we .� \ ms \ f p eouxonm
,�I1 V x�\\\� -wle \'-G�""\`_—„\ a� _ 5 as F f, U
Sr n t ss g - —
I ', tic 7 V 1. ,c<rw,00 ms I K�4 aF,..
"' a 'j -w..i n "-- I swlouet wa
' `;' 1• y7 1`/1 —I wua auwry sSCHAACw
-�rl w '. I W _J •oncxnow roro OISQI A
wornl
-'.savlv•rw"'wwlr Ea 66 •
•
worrrnav >t
•
�u 1,,._.. �..-.- .. I
nl5 fil e- n/o. (9-mi34
8 mN ••t swweiwoo Approved a
4� II :'w 1.e • Clean Water Services
a° 1 1 POl _ lA ey ✓{N pal! £121I1( ii 4 0.
p�
F- i .LLE XM 10
'H�}'' MOIRI
aaIASA9 ,* Ij•
' I cureai To PI Ai ATIO11«aE SPL. 'gTNU•r•+E,n- 4 of L 7
a ! a
e
a
1 I C4
v
PRELIMINARY FOR REVIEW ONLY
11
Nye 7NT
ti
Tony Weller
From: Ryan Smith <ryan@tvwd.org>
Sent: Thursday,July 24, 2014 4:02 PM
To: Tony Weller
Subject: RE: SW Spruce St. &SW 85th Ave.
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Tony,
Tualatin Valley Water District has adequate capacity to provide service to Tax Lot 4400(assessor tax map 1S1 36
CB). The proposed use will make the necessary service connection and/or extensions of water mains, as required,to
serve the subject property and will be shown on plans submitted for approval prior to connection to the system.
Contact the Tualatin Valley Water District for requirements regarding submittal of plans for review and approval and for
review fees or any questions you may have.
Ryan Smith
Engineering Associate
Tualatin Valley Water District
1850 SW 170th Av
Beaverton,OR 97006
direct:503-848-3057
mobile:503-969-7885
From: Tony Weller [mailto:tweller;a cesnw.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 10:03 AM
To: Ryan Smith
Subject: RE: SW Spruce St. & SW 85th Ave.
Thank you Ryan this is helpful. Can you send us an email just stating there is adequate water supply for our project. We
are proposing to remove an existing single family house and build a multi-purpose gym, classroom,coffee station with
restrooms for the church. The building is about 7000 sf.
I will attached an existing conditions and site plan for your information.
Thank you again for your help—Tony
Tony Weller, P.E., P.L.S.
President
CESNW, INC.
13190 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 150
Tigard, OR 97223
503.968.6655 p
503.968.2595 f
503.866.6550 c
twellercesnw.com
www.cesnw.com
1
TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Test#: 1099
FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST REPORT Hydrant ID #: 1S1W35A34FH5C
Location: SPRUCE ST&89TH AVE Date: 6/10/2014
Test made by: HERB &JAMES
Witness: Time: 1:25
Project name:
Discharge coefficient: .54816
Inside dia. of outlet= 4.5 inches
Pitot reading = 44 psi Pitot 2 = 0 psi
Observed flow rate = 2195.7 gpm
Flow method: HOSE MONSTER
Static pressure: 107 psi Residual pressure: 96 psi
7(i(147/
Flow at 20psi residual pressure (calculated): 6707 gpm
Location map: To be attached to test report and to show which hydrants were
used to monitor residual pressure and flow.
Gage information:
Static and residual pressure gage: 120997-2C Pitot gage: 51414B1
Hydrant information:
Hydrant ID Year Make Notes
Flow hydrant: 1S1W35A34FH50 1974 WATEROUS see map for location
Read hydrant: 1S1W35A22FH50 1974 WATEROUS see map for location
Remarks:
The mapping,flow or pressure information contained herein reflects conditions on the date and
time of the test. Tualatin Valley Water District makes no representation as to the system's
ability to meet specific fire flow requirements. Future system capability may differ from the
flows reported herein because of subsequent modifications to the district's system and/or
because flow and pressure may vary by time of day and season. Test gage callibration
information available upon request.
411Ir
A
OCr
J vo
~ ]b0 a
ASH = Q I
Ilialli 'RULE Cv a�
/sass ST. a
O „ $.'.cv
et AN M A'_
LE
1.1
JOE CT. Li
a ST. CrU T QI 1 /508 -- - - LL zol 1 �� Sre++ a aep
01
•• a
_ it
a
7,
r...
/ MN
4.1
Mille -...
n
ti
/629t
'‘sc� t 0'tv
ti
C p
6C q
MI
ST.
6•O p- td•� w i
=1r 1 ei 1
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT
To: Tony Weller, CESNW, Inc.
From: Dave Anderson, Anderson Associates
Date: October 27, 2014
RE: J.I. B.C. URBAN FORESTRY PLAN SUBMITTAL
PROJECT SUMMARY:
This report is a supplement to the set of Urban Forestry Plans including L1-Tree Preservation
and Removal Site Plan, L2 -Tree Canopy Site Plan, L3 - Parking Lot Tree Canopy Plan, .
and L-4- Soil Volume Plan. The report includes inventory data for existing trees and an
existing tree stand and tree protection fencing and tree preservation specifications.
The report also includes inventory data for proposed open space trees, and inventory
data for effective tree canopy cover of the entire site. Existing soil conditions and supplemental
specifications for proposed trees include soil preparation and tree planting specifications
are also included in this report.
G\ST
41w/2 2/
.
ji •
D ANDERSON 0
OREGON
I hereby attest that:
1. The Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10,
Part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual;
2. The Tree Canopy Site Plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10, Part 2 of the Urban
Forestry Manual: and
3. The Supplemental Report meets all of the requirements in Section 10, Part 3 of the Urban
Forestry Manual.
Date: I'0 .-74¢
ANDE.R5ON A55OCIATt 5
2860 SE Ash Street Portland, Oregon 97214
Ph.503-318-0549 www.andersonassociates-la.com
MIIP
EXISTING TREE INVENTORY - SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT
EXISTING TREE INVENTORY
NUMERICAL NUMERICAL
COMMON NAME AVE.TREE CONDITION SUITABILITY FOR PROPOSED FOR
TREE# BOTANICAL NAME DBH CANOPY S.F. RATING PRESERVATION PRESERVATION
2786 W. RED CEDAR
THUJA PLICATA 39" 1260 1 1 N
2149 SWEET CHERRY
PRUNUS AVIUM 12 720 2 2 Y
2148 AUSTRIAN PINE
PINUS NIGRA 9 200 2 2 Y
2147 AUSTRIAN PINE
PINUS NIGRA 9 185 2 2 Y
2146 AUSTRIAN PINE
PINUS NIGRA 10 0 1 0 N
2145 AUSTRIAN PINE
PINUS NIGRA 6 290 2 2 Y
2144 AUSTRIAN PINE
PINUS NIGRA 11 708 2 2 Y.
2143 AUSTRIAN PINE
PINUS NIGRA 12 679 2 2 Y
2135 OR. WHITE OAK
QUERCUS GARRYANA 17 1286 2 2 Y
2133 PONDEROSA PINE
PINUS PONDEROSA 29 309 1 1 N
1276 SWEET CHERRY
PRUNUS AVIUM 6 449 2 2 N
1092 OR. WHITE OAK
QUERCUS GARRYANA 23 704 2 2 N
1824 DOGWOOD
CORNUS FLORIDA 6 260 2 2 N
SUBTOTAL EXISTING TREES TO BE PRESERVED 7050
MINUS TREES WITH NUMERICAL RATING 1 2982
TOTAL 4068 X 2 (OPEN GROWTH CREDIT) EQUALS 8136 SF
NOTE: NO EXISTING HERITAGE TREES ON THIS SITE
EXISTING TREE INVENTORY - SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT
EXISTING TREE INVENTORY (CONT.)
NUMERICAL NUMERICAL
COMMON NAME AVE. TREE CONDITION SUITABILITY FOR PROPOSED FOR
TREE# BOTANICAL NAME DBH CANOPY S.F. RATING PRESERVATION PRESERVATION
1096 LONDON PLANE
PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA 9" 713 1 1 N
2694 SWEET CHERRY
PRUNUS AVIUM 10 298 2 2 Y
2140 AUSTRIAN PINE
PINUS NIGRA 6 73 2 2 Y
1091 AUSTRIAN PINE
PINUS NIGRA 6 188 1 1 N
1090 AUSTRIAN PINE
PINUS NIGRA 6 188 1 1 N
1089 AUSTRIAN PINE
PINUS NIGRA 6 188 2 2 N
1088 AUSTRIAN PINE
PINUS NIGRA 6 79 2 2 N
1087 AUSTRIAN PINE
PINUS NIGRA 6 80 2 2 N
1097 OR. WHITE ASH
FRAXINUS LATIFOLIA 8 324 1 1 N
1098 OR. WHITE ASH
FRAXINUS LATIFOLIA 8 294 2 2 Y
1099 OR. WHITE ASH
FRAXINUS LATIFOLIA 12 469 2 2 Y
SUBTOTAL 2894
MINUS TREES WITH NUMERICAL RATING= 1 1760
TOTAL &TREES NOT PRESERVED 1134 X 2 (OPEN GROW CREDIT) EQUALS 2268 SF
EXISTING TREE STAND INVENTORY
STAND COMMON NAME AVE AVE. COND. OVERALL TOTAL CANOPY
BOTANICAL NAME DBH RATING PRES. RATING CANOPY PRESERVED
1 OR. WHITE ASH
FRAXINUS LATIFOLIA 6" 2 2 35569 S.F. 35569 SF
+v
PLANTED TREES INVENTORY - SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT
PLANTED TREE INVENTORY
MATURE MATURE AVAILABLE
COMMON NAME CANOPY CANOPY SOIL
TREE# BOTANICAL NAME CALIPER SPREAD(FT) AREA(SF) VOLUME(CF)
Al GINKO
GINKO BILOBA 1.5" 45 1590 1017
A2 GINKO
GINKO BILOBA 1.5" 45 1590 1020
A3 GINKO
GINKO BILOBA 1.5" 45 1590 1002
A4 GINKO
GINKO BILOBA 1.5" 45 1590 1605
A5 GINKO
GINKO BILOBA 1.5" 45 - 1590 1251
A6 GINKO
GINKO BILOBA 1.5" 45 1590 1935
B1 S. MAGNOLIA
MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA 1.5" 60 1963 1017
B2 S. MAGNOLIA
MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA 1.5" 60 1963 3105
B3 S. MAGNOLIA
MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA 1.5" 60 1963 3324
Cl AM. HOPHORNBEAM
OSTRYA VIRGINIANA 1.5" 25 491 685
C2 AM. HOPHORNBEAM
OSTRYA VIRGINIANA 1.5" 25 491 685
C3 AM. HOPHORNBEAM
OSTRYA VIRGINIANA 1.5" 25 491 685
C4 AM. HOPHORNBEAM
OSTRYA VIRGINIANA 1.5" 25 491 685
EFFECTIVE TREE CANOPY COVER SUMMARY QUALIFIED EXISTING
MATURE CANOPY OPEN GROW EXISTING TREE EFFECTIVE%
LOT LOT AREA(S.F.) PLANTED TREES TREES STAND CANOPY AREA
1 133,155 S.F. 17,393 S.F. 10,404 SF 35,569 S.F. 47%
TOTAL EFFECTIVE CANOPY AREA 63,366 SF
EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS
EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS FOR THE EXISTING TREES INCLUDES:
Topsoil: Highly organic SILT(OL-ML), brown, roots throughout, loose, moist.
To 3' deep: Medium stiff to stiff, SILT (ML)with gravel, brown, micaceous, strong
orange and gray mottling. damp (undocumented fill).
3' to 8' deep: Stiff to very stiff SILT(ML) trace fine grained sand, light brown, subtle
orange and gray mottling trace black staining, moist to wet. (Willamette
Formation)
SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS
EXISTING TREE SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS
TREE PROTECTION FENCING SPECIFICATIONS
SEE SHEET L1, TREE PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL SITE PLAN FOR TREE PROTECTION
FENCING NOTES AND DETAIL
TREE PRESERVATION SPECIFICATONS
SEE SHEET Li, TREE PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL SITE PLAN FOR EXISTING TREE
PROTECTION SPECIFICATIONS.
PROPOSED TREE SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS
SOIL CHARACTERISTICS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT
1.1 GENERAL
A. Place planting soil and fertilizers according to requirements in other Specifications and Drawings.
B. Verify that no foreign or deleterious material or liquid such as paint, paint washout, concrete slurry,
concrete layers or chunks, cement. plaster, oils, gasoline, diesel fuel, paint thinner, turpentine, tar,
roofing compound, or acid has been deposited in planting soil.
Anderson Associates
2860 SE Ash Street, Portland, OR 97214
(503) 318-0549 ,avE:, ;i 7,'i ' ._
ti
C. Proceed with placement only after unsatisfactory conditions have been corrected.
1.2 PREPARATION OF UNAMENDED, ON-SITE SOIL BEFORE AMENDING
A. Excavation: Excavate soil from designated area(s)to a depth of 4" and stockpile until amended.
B. Unacceptable Materials: Clean soil of concrete slurry, concrete layers or chunks, cement, plaster,
building debris, oils, gasoline, diesel fuel, paint thinner, turpentine, tar, roofing compound, acid, and
other extraneous materials that are harmful to plant growth.
C. Unsuitable Materials: Clean soil to contain a maximum of 8 percent by dry weight of stones, roots,
plants, sod, clay lumps, and pockets of coarse sand.
1.3 PLACING AND MIXING PLANTING SOIL OVER EXPOSED SUBGRADE
A. General: Apply and mix unamended soil with amendments on-site to produce required planting soil. Do
not apply materials or till if existing soil or subgrade is frozen, muddy, or excessively wet.
B. Subgrade Preparation: See Drawings for tilling depth. Remove stones larger than 1-1/2 inches in any
dimension and sticks, roots, rubbish, and other extraneous matter and legally dispose of them off
Owner's property.
C. Mixing: See Drawings for mixing of topsoil and amendments. Do not spread if soil or subgrade is
frozen, muddy, or excessively wet.
1. Amendments: Apply soil amendments and fertilizer as noted in the Drawings.
D. Finish Grading: Grade planting soil to a smooth, uniform surface plane with loose, uniformly fine texture.
Roll and rake, remove ridges, and fill depressions to meet finish grades.
1.4 PROTECTION
A. Protection Zone: Identify protection zones according to Section 015639 "Temporary Tree and Plant
Protection."
B. Protect areas of in-place soil from additional compaction, disturbance, and contamination. Prohibit the
following practices within these areas except as required to perform planting operations:
1. Storage of construction materials, debris, or excavated material.
2. Parking vehicles or equipment.
3. Vehicle traffic.
4. Foot traffic.
5. Erection of sheds or structures.
6. Impoundment of water.
7. Excavation or other digging unless otherwise indicated.
Anderson Associates
2860 SE Ash Street, Portland,OR 97214
(503)318-0549 dave(cs?andersonassoc-la.net
If planting soil or subgrade is overcompacted, disturbed, or contaminated by foreign or deleterious
materials or liquids, remove the planting soil and contamination; restore the subgrade as directed by
Architect and replace contaminated planting soil with new planting soil
TREE PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS.
3.3 PLANTING TREES
A. Place plants for best appearance.
B. Set plants vertical.
C. Remove wire baskets and non-biodegradable root containers.
D. Excavate pit to 12"wider than root ball or root system.
E. Set plants in pits or beds,fill with excavated topsoil. Remove non-biodegradable
material, ropes, and wires from the root ball.
F. Place soil in 6 inch layers,tamp and then water to settle.
3.4 FERTILIZING
A. When planting hole is three-fourths filled, place planting tablets evenly spaced
around each plant. Provide the following quantities per plant:
1. Evergreen trees: Four 21 gram tablets.
2. Deciduous trees up to 1 1/2"caliper:Three 21 gram tablets.
3. Deciduous trees up to 2"caliper: Four 21 gram tablets.
4. Deciduous trees up to 2 1/2 caliper: Five 21 gram tablets.
3.5 MULCHING
A. Install a 2"deep, 3 foot diameter circle of bark mulch around the trunk of all trees
planted in lawn areas. In shrub beds, install 2"deep layer of bark mulch
under drip line of trees.
3.6 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL
A. Field inspection will be performed under provisions of Section 01400
B. Plants will be rejected when showing growth damage, lack of vigor or when ball or
earth surrounding roots has been disturbed or damaged prior to or during planting.
3.7 INSPECTIONS DEMONSTRATIONS
A. Notify the Owner 3 days prior to the date of any desired inspection.
B. Upon completion of all landscape installation work,at the Contractor's request, the
Owner will inspect landscape work to determine acknowledgement of completion of
installation work.
C. The date of Owner's acknowledgement of substantial completion establishes the
beginning date for the on year warranty period.
Anderson Associates
2860 SE Ash Street, Portland, OR 97214
(503)318-0549 dave@andersonassoc-la.n,et
D. One year following date of substantial completion, the Owner will inspect the site to
- determine the condition of warranty materials.
E. Maintenance:
1 Maintain all plants from time of installation until final acceptance
2, Maintain areas by watering,weeding and general clean up.
F. Final Acceptance: 30 days(minimum)following Owner's acknowledgement of
substantial completion,the Owner will re-inspect all plantings to verify final
acceptance of installed work. Final acceptance will be based on all plants being in
place and healthy, and all beds being clean,well graded,weed free and mulched
per specifications.
G. Where inspected landscape work does not comply with drawings or specified
requirements, replace rejected work and continue specified maintenance until re-
inspected by Owner and found to be acceptable.
Anderson Associates
2860 SE Ash Street, Portland, OR 97214
(503)318-0549
David Hunter, Consulting Arborist 12/20/2013
Project Name: Japanese International Baptist Church 8500 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR
DAVID D. HUNTER
Registered Consulting Arborist#408
PO Box 324 Forest Grove, Oregon 97116-0324
503-319-0380
December 20, 2013
Ken Yokoi
Japanese International Baptist Church
8500 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97224
503-246-4680
kenyokoy@gmail.com
RE: TREE INVENTORY,PRESERVATION AND REPORT for 8500 SW Spruce
Street Tigard,OR.
Dear Ken Yokoi,
The following is a consulting arborist report concerning tree inventory and health
assessment of the trees on the property located at 8500 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR
97224.
Scope of Project
The scope of this tree inventory is to give the property owner a through tree inspection
for the health of the trees on the property. The report was done to aid the property owner
in meeting the requirements of City of Tigard, OR Municipal Codes concerning trees and
shrubs on the property, prior to development. (18.790.030.C, 18.790.050.C)
Summary/Abstract
The purpose of this tree inventory is to give tree identification and location prior to site
improvements,as well as tree preservation plan, construction sequence, and guidelines
for the protection of trees to remain and protect the adjacent trees that are off the property
on the west side. The Guidelines for tree protection and construction sequence are a
separate document but are attached as part of this report. The main goal will be to protect
the trees outside of the site improvements. For what is proposed with the site
improvements,there is only one small 5"DBH dogwood tree lost. The canopy loss is
insignificant with all the trees inventoried, plus all the trees not inventoried that are in the
wetland area and provide great canopy cover for the property. The construction activity
will have no impact on the existing parking lot area or any of the trees that are on the
eastern edges of the property along the parking lot area.
DDH/13-677 Urban Forestry Plan 8500 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97224
1
e
David Hunter, Consulting Arborist 12/20/2013
Project Name: Japanese International Baptist Church 8500 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR
Tree Inventory
All trees larger than 5"DBH were inspected. The trees were tagged with aluminum tags
for aid in location and further inspection or tree protection. The tags should be removed
at the end of the project. The inventory was of fourteen trees and is in this report. Other
trees are located well out of project area, and I see no conflicts for these tree roots.
Tree Identification
Common Name Scientific Name
Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata
Cherry Prunus species
Pine scrub Pinus virginiana
Oregon white oak Quercus garryana
Ponderosa pine Pinus ponderosa
London plane Platanus x acerifolia
Dogwood Cornus species
Tree 1: Western red cedar 39" DBH, 18' CS (canopy spread)poor condition,cavity and
seam on the east side of tree.
Tree 2: Cherry 14"DBH, 15'CS fair condition,2 stems at DBH.
Tree 3: Pine 9"DBH, 7' CS fair condition.
Tree 4: Pine 8"DBH, 5' CS fair condition.
Tree 5: Pine 10"DBH, 0' CS Dead condition.
Tree 6: Pine 6"DBH, 8'CS fair condition.
Tree 7: Pine 11' DBH, 8'CS fair condition lean 20 %.
Tree 8: Pine 12"DBH, 8' CS fair condition lean 20%.
Tree 9: Oregon white oak 17"DBH average 2 stems at 2', 20' CS, and fair condition.
Tree 10: Ponderosa pine 29"DBH, 5'CS,poor condition topped at 40' multiple cavities.
Tree 11: Cherry 6"DBH, 10' CS fair condition.
Tree 12: Oregon white oak 23"DBH,20' CS fair condition.
Tree 13: London plane 9"DBH average 2 stems at 2', 15' CS fair condition.
Tree 14: Dogwood 5"DBH average, 10' CS fair condition.
Inspection Date: December 19, 2013. Site map with tree location is page five of this
report.
DBH: This is a measurement of tree diameter at breast height, a standard measurement
taken at 4.5 feet above ground. Trees that have a common base are measured at DBH and
the average is taken for the stems.
CS: This is a measurement of Canopy Spread, how far does the canopy spread to make
the drip line and an average is taken from all sides of the tree. The drip line is a good
indication of where the main support roots extend to, and aids in tree protection planning.
DDH/13-677 Urban Forestry Plan 8500 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97224
2
,
David Hunter, Consulting Arborist 12/20/2013
Project Name: Japanese International Baptist Church 8500 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR
Condition
Good: Trees rated as good are in apparent good health and appear structurally sound.No
apparent problems or immediate concerns.
Fair: Trees rated as fair are in a state of decline. It can be possible to remedy some of the
trees' problems,but the fact is, once tree decline starts it is difficult to remove/remedy
all aspects of the tree decline.
Poor: Trees rated as poor are in poor health or have structural problems that it difficult, if
not impractical to save the tree. Removal is recommended.
Dead: These trees are dead and may pose an immediate risk due to the extent of decay in
the main trunk, stem or larger branching. See hazardous.
Hazardous: Trees rated as hazardous are not in good shape either structurally or health
condition. Some of the hazards can be taken care of by proper pruning, if practical.
Usually,REMOVAL IS RECOMMENDED as soon as possible to avoid injury to life or
property.
Trees that are in poor health usually have a low landscape value or even a negative value.
The mitigation value for these trees should be similar value of low or none.
The Tree Protection Plan is finalized with exact markings of where the site and
development will be on the ground. An accurate assessment of protection measures can
be done for the trees to be protected, with the consulting arborist on site for tree
protection fencing placement, and during the construction activities as needed or
required. With the scope of the construction to be done, I see no impact on the existing
trees. There will be no need for tree protection fencing. The protection guidelines and
construction sequence are included in case the project scope does change.
I inspected the site on December 19,2013. Observations and conclusions are as of that
date.
Conclusion
It is my professional judgment that trees to be preserved can be done so,with no
complications. I do see need to remove one tree as part of site redevelopment. The tree is
a 5"DBH dogwood tree and the canopy loss is insignificant. Follow the construction
sequence stated in the Guidelines for Tree Protection and Construction Sequence.
DDH/13-677 Urban Forestry Plan 8500 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97224
3
David Hunter, Consulting Arborist 12/20/2013
Project Name: Japanese International Baptist Church 8500 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR
Certification
1 certify that all the statements in the foregoing report and tree survey are correct to the
best of my knowledge, and are made in good faith.
�eO�
Y�I\M4 MY�1/R ti
kibr
i/ c0+suhh+b� `
David D. Hunter, Consulting Arborist
American Society of Consulting Arborists—Registered Consulting Arborist# 408
ISA Certified Arborist# PN-1068A
USFS Hazard Tree Risk Assessor Trained 1988
ISA Certified Tree Assessor Qualified
Professional Forester
DDH/13-677 Urban Forestry Plan 8500 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97224
4
,
d9
• S
r
5' Countour Lines
Pt �`' cR 3 'is Contour lines W I
,/
BC buildings ' ar
Property line
0 25 50 100 150 200
Feet
€350Q si,.-) ?l2
q 7 7-2 ) �2 r1922 �f
o 77? XikA/E-Nyo Iz-/1-2&
3'15 = T ' eaca4r` on/
61
1z
13
1
•
\S 1/U�r • ��s
GV"-7/7
07.
g 0 l t277,5 7uZo1�1.f
• / -N 4/o 3
200 T71//,(p
,r/3 -3 ? --6). ."0
/Z-/zol zo i 3 deer
P
David D.Hunter,Registered Consulting Arborist# 408 1
Project Name: Japanese International Baptist Church 8500 SW Spruce Street Tigard,
Oregon 97224 December 20, 2013
Guidelines for Protection of Trees on Construction Sites
To preserve certain mature trees within a construction site some precautions must be
taken to assure that neither the trunk, limbs,nor root system of the tree are excessively
damaged. The root system of a tree is the most vital,the most delicate part of the plant,
and the most easily damaged.
The root system extends far from the trunk, often beyond the drip line of a tree. The fine
absorbing roots,those that collect water and nutrients for the tree, are located primarily
within the top eight to twelve inches of the soil. The roots and soil in this surface layer
must be protected from injury.
Any encroachment, disturbance, or compaction of the soil around the tree will damage or
destroy the fine absorbing roots. Injury caused by cutting, crushing, suffocation,
poisoning, or moisture stress by inundation or dehydration can result in the death of the
tree. Injuries caused during construction projects may not be filially apparent for many
years after completion of the project, but can ultimately kill the tree.
The following guidelines are minimum standards recommended for the preservation of
trees. These guidelines should be incorporated in construction contracts, and details made
available to all parties involved with the work on the site, including equipment operators.
Other guidelines and protective measures may also be appropriate, in addition to those
listed below.
1. Protection Barrier: A protection barrier shall be installed around the tree or trees to
be preserved. The barrier shall be constructed of durable fencing material such as
chain-link fencing. This project: the fencing should be chain-link fencing. The
barrier shall be placed as far from the base of the tree(s) as possible, preferably at
the drip-line. The fencing shall be maintained in good repair throughout the
duration of the project, and shall not be removed, relocated, or encroached upon
without permission of the arborist involved. There shall be signing on the fencing
stating who the project site arborist is and a contact phone number(David D.
Hunter, Consulting Arborist 503-319-0380), and that no encroachment occurs
without the written consent of the project arborist.
2. Storage of Materials: There shall be NO storage of materials or supplies of any
kind within the protection barriers. Concrete and cement materials,block, stone,
sand, and soil shall NOT be placed within the drip-line of the tree.
3. Fuel Storage: Fuel storage shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet of any tree to be
preserved. Refueling, servicing, and maintenance of equipment and machinery
shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet of protected trees.
4. Debris and Waste Materials: Debris and waste from construction or other activities
shall NOT be permitted within the protected areas. Wash-down of concrete or
cement handling equipment, in particular, shall NOT be permitted within 150 feet
of protected trees.
DDH/13-677 Tree Protection Guidelines and Construction Sequence
David D. Hunter, Registered Consulting Arborist#408 2
Project Name: Japanese International Baptist Church 8500 SW Spruce Street Tigard,
Oregon 97224 December 20,2013
5. Grade Changes: Grade changes can be particularly damaging to trees. Even as little
as two inches of fill can cause the death of a tree. Lowering the grade can destroy
major portions of a root system. Any grade changes proposed should be approved
by an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist or a
Registered Consulting Arborist(RCA) of the American Society of Consulting
Arborists(ASCA) before construction begins, and precautions taken to mitigate
potential injuries to trees attempting to preserve.
6. Damages: Any damages or injuries to the trees should be reported to the project
arborist as soon as possible. Severed roots shall be pruned cleanly to healthy tissue,
using proper pruning tools. Broken branches or limbs shall be pruned according to
International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Pruning Guidelines and ANSI A-300
Pruning Standards.
7. Preventative Measures: Before construction begins, fertilization of the affected
trees is recommended to improve the tree vigor and health. Soil analysis testing
should be completed to assure fertilization with appropriate fertilization products.
Pruning of the tree canopies and branches should be done at the direction of the
project arborist to remove any dead or broken branches, and to provide the
necessary clearance for construction equipment.
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
1. Any legal description provided to the consultant is assumed to be correct. Any
titles and ownership's to any property are assumed to be good and marketable.No
responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character. Any and all property is
appraised or evaluated as though free and clear, under responsible ownership and
competent management.
2. It is assumed that any property is not in violation of any applicable codes,
ordinances, statutes,or other governmental regulations.
3. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has
been verified insofar as possible; however,the consultant can neither guarantee nor
be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others.
4. The consultant shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason
of this report, unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including
payment of an additional fee for such services described in the fee schedule and
contract of engagement.
5. Loss or alteration of any of this report invalidates the entire report.
6. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or
use for any other than the person to whom it is addressed,without the prior
expressed written or verbal consent of the consultant/appraiser.
7. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report,nor copy thereof, shall be
conveyed by anyone, including the client, to the public through advertising, public
relations, news, sales, or other media,without the prior expressed written or verbal
consent of the consultant/appraiser—particularly as to value conclusions, identity
of the consultant/appraiser, or any reference to any professional society or institute
or to any installed designation, conferred upon the consultant/appraiser as stated in
his qualifications.
DDH/13-677 Tree Protection Guidelines and Construction Sequence
•
David D. Hunter,Registered Consulting Arborist#408 3
Project Name: Japanese International Baptist Church 8500 SW Spruce Street Tigard,
Oregon 97224 December 20,2013
Construction Sequence
1. Before: Before work is started,the tree protection fencing must be installed, with
guidance of the project arborist. Any pruning to avoid conflict with the fencing can
be done by the project arborist during installation. Fencing shall be signed with
project arborist and/or city arborist contact information. Signing shall face out
toward work area.
2. During: The tree protection plan is to save the adjacent trees in the project area, and
to have as little impact as possible. Any pruning or removals should follow the
Guidelines for the Protection of Trees on Construction Sites must be followed.
Large roots over 2"diameter should be dug under or around instead of shear
cutting with equipment. If larger roots must be cut the Guidelines must be
followed. The project arborist will be notified of the cutting of larger roots over 2"
of diameter. Project arborist can be on site, with reasonable notice, to be able to aid
in the pruning of tree limbs or roots. Project arborist will write report(s)to
document tree protection work done.
3. After: Project arborist to verify that tree protection standards were met as
pertaining to the Guidelines for the Protection of Trees, and write report as needed
to document results.
2,ze,(42
David D. Hunter,ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#408
PO Box 324
Forest Grove, OR 97116
USFS Tree Risk Assessor Trained 1988 0.
NL
ISA Certified Arborist# PN -1068A %�o 4�,
ISA Certified Tree Risk Assessor Qualified /Qt *�
Professional Forester J
Cell: 503-319-0380 `��
Email: ddhunterarborist(caaol.com
Web: www.davidhunterarborist.com 1` ��+�b�
citsuhMtl
DDH/13-677 Tree Protection Guidelines and Construction Sequence
PRELIMINARY Intersection
Sight Distance Certification
August 13, 2014
City of Tigard
CD- Development Engineering
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
503.639.4171 Fax:503.624.0752
RE: JAPANESE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH
PRELIMINARY Sight Distance Certificate—8500 SW Spruce Street
The existing access on Spruce Street for this project is located adjacent to the easterly
property line. The speed limit along Spruce Street is 25 M.P.H., based upon the posted
speed limit, requiring 280 feet of sight distance in both directions, in accord with Tigard
Development Code Section 18.705.030.H.1.
As required by Code Section 18.705.030.H.1, sight distance from the access along Spruce
Street was measured to be greater than 300 feet to the east of the access(with minor
vegetation removal within the right-of-way) and was measured to be greater than 300 feet to
the west(with some vegetation removal in right of way within the project limits). The Code
Section requires that measurements be based on an eye height of 3.5 feet and an object
height of 4.25 feet above the road; and be assumed to be 10 feet from the near edge of
travel lane to the front of a stopped vehicle. (Actual measurement is taken 15 feet from near
edge of travel lane).
In conclusion, I hereby certify that the intersection sight distance is available at the existing
access for Japanese International Baptist Church. Sight Distance conforms to the
requirements as set forth in the Tigard Development Code, subject to the following
improvements:
1. ;rpf;. .f vegetation within the right of way.
�5 GINEF9'oti
,►
(, lREGON
NY 8
Anthony R. Weller, P.E., P.L.S.
CESNW, Inc.
C E S NW
Memorandum . � tp
141.1 �
TO: City of Tigard /1241 / / /-`DATE: 07/15/14
-EGO
FROM: Anthony RWeller;P- G;i'26 1 � PROJECT#: 2967
s
SUBJECT: JIBC - Multipurpose B B . - '-- inary Stormwater Management Report
4 'T (OI3a]V
Existing Conditions
The Japanese International Baptist Church Multipurpose Building project is located at 8500 SW
Spruce St. The site fronts onto SW Spruce and is bounded to the east and west by developed
residential lots. The Church's site is developed and generally consists of two main buildings with three
small out-buildings, associated walk ways, a general parking area, and open space. The Church
recently purchased the lot adjacent to its west boundary at its north end that consists of residential
structures that will be removed to facilitate proposed multipurpose building. The site slopes gently
from its north-east end at an elevation of about 194, to its southerly end where the elevation drops to
about 183. The site generally drains from the north to its south end. Total site area is approximately
3.06 acres.
According to the Soil Conservation Service's soil survey of Washington County the site consists of
Aloha silt loam and Cove silty clay loam designated as Map Unit Symbol's 1 and 13, classified as
Hydrologic Soil Groups C/D and D, respectively.
Proposed Improvements
The project consists of adding a multipurpose building to the Church site. The addition will include the
multipurpose building with a 6968 SF foot print, and associated on-site walkways. In addition to the
on-site improvements, a half street improvement along the site's frontage to SW Spruce St consisting
of pavement widening with curb, a 5 foot planter and a 5 foot public sidewalk is proposed. The on-site
improvements will include a storm system that will collect, treat and detain stormwater from the
proposed improvements before releasing flows to the natural drainage at the south end of the site.
The off-site improvements will include a curb inlet picking up curb flows on the south side of SW
Spruce St and the re-alignment of the existing culvert at that location.
Water Quality
The project will meet the City of Tigard's requirements and Clean Water Services standards for water
quality. The stormwater for the proposed on-site improvements will be treated by an extended dry
basin at the bottom of the detention pond located at the south end of the site. The total on-site
impervious created by the proposed improvements totals 9,466 SF. Since the proposed off-site half
street improvements drain away from the site (to the north and then to the west) the water quality for
the new-impervious area created by the half street improvement will be addressed with a "Fee in
Lieu". The new impervious area created by the half street improvement including pavement, curb and
sidewalk is 1,698 SF.
For the on-site water quality, the extended dry basin area has been sized as outlined in the Clean
Water Services Design and Construction Standards 4.05.6. The total water quality volume for 9,466
SF of impervious area was calculated to be 284 CU FT. The bottom of the proposed water quality
CESNW,Inc.
CESNW Memorandum
Page 2of2
basin is about 60 feet in length, and about 9 feet in width. When holding the 284 cubic foot water
quality volume, the water quality depth in the basin will be about 0.5 feet.
Water Quantity
The project will meet the City of Tigard's requirements and Clean Water Services standards for water
quantity. The stormwater for the proposed on-site improvements will be detained by a detention pond
located at the south end of the site. Since the proposed off-site half street improvements drain away
from the site, the water quantity for the new-impervious area created by the half street improvement
will be addressed with a "Fee in Lieu".
For the on-site water quantity, the detention pond has been sized as outlined in the Clean Water
Services Design and Construction Standards 4.03.4. Specifically, the 2, 10, and 25-year post-
development runoff rates for the new impervious surfaces will not exceed their respective 2, 10, and
25-year pre-development runoff rates.
Since the proposed improvement area is limited to the north end of the site, and the improvement
area naturally drains towards the proposed treatment and detention area, the basin area contributing
to the detention facility is limited to the improvement area and the area directly above the proposed
detention facility. Refer to the attached Stormwater Summary Map (Sheet 1 of 1). The contributing
basin area totals 27,216 SF(0.62 acres). The contributing basin contains two soil hydrologic groups
(C/D & D) therefore a weighted CN value of 83 was calculated for the basin. The pre-developed time
of concentration was calculated to be 14 minutes with a post development time of concentration of 8
minutes. Attached are copies of the pre and post development hydrographs for the basin and the
pond outflow hydrograph.
Below is a summary of the site's pre-development flows, and flows into and out of the proposed
detention and treatment pond/basin:
Post-
developed Depth of Storage
Post- (With Flow Including
Pre- developed Control Storage Permanent Pool
Storm developed (Unrestricted) Structure) Volume Storage
Event flow (cfs) flow(cfs) flow(cfs) _ (cf) (ft) _
0.62 Acre 2-Year 0.13 0.23 0.13 287 1.25
Basin 10-year 0.25 0.36 0.25 439 1.38
25-year 0.31 0.43 0.25 582 1.50
Stormwater Disposal
All storm water runoff for the proposed site improvements will be treated and detained, and pre-
development flows for the 2, 10, and 25-year events will be discharged as sheet flow towards the
natural drainage at the south end of the site.
CESNW,Inc.
C E S NW SHEET NO. OF / (/
CESNW,INC. CALCULATED BY DATE
15573 SW RANGY RD.,STE.300 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 CHECKED BY
503.9613.6655 TEL 503.968.2595 FAX www.cesnw.com DATE
SCALE
;o1_
r�
� z ,.
ash loz.1.0.4 Al4A. . 540
Q w t dt
, c...t!)4Tils;
iS Wto
AatA,4) 5 + b bfsr
JOB
CES NW
SHEET NO. — — OF
CALCULATED BY_... DATE
CESNW,INC.
15573 SW RANGY RDA,STE.300 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 CHECKED BY _ DATE
503.968.6655 TEL 503.968.2595 FAX www.cesnw.com
SCALE
1. U• I5
0. 06H-7_
0UCJL a S .cc.t`; P.:d o t L•5b
6Q1 ow Flo ,
OE 0.0
IUD id : D. 51. .4
Tal-rA ort 12). 1-KN.:,
'beJ
lD -Q• (5
Pit
71)4( T(__ __ (51 k 4-- • 1- 5k-f .`',°
Project: JIBC
C E S NWProject Number: 2967
SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH Date: 07/11/14
SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION
Basin: ON-SITE ADD
Event: 2 YEAR PRE-DEV
Given:
Area= 0.62 acres
Pt = 2.5 inches
dt = 10 min.
Tc = 14 min.
w = 0.2632 routing constant
Pervious Area Impervious Area HYDROGRAPH RESULTS
Area= 0.62 acres Area = 0 acres Peak Runoff 0.13 cfs
CN = 83 CN = 98 Total Vol. : 2353 cf
S = 2.05 S = 0.20
0.2S= 0.41 0.2S = 0.04
Peak Runoff Hydrograph
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
V
0
0.1
0.0 -
0.0
0.0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Time in Minutes
File:SBUH-24 2 YEAR PRE,xls
71141P014 CESINW, Inc. Page 1
Cy Project Number: 2967
SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH Date: 07/11/14
SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION
Basin: ON-SITE ADD
Event: 10 YEAR PRE-DEV
Given:
Area = 0.62 acres
Pt = 3.45 inches
dt = 10 min.
Tc = 14 min.
w = 0.2632 routing constant
Pervious Area Impervious Area HYDROGRAPH RESULTS
Area= 0.62 acres Area = 0 acres Peak Runoff 0.25 cfs
CN = 83 CN = 98 Total Vol. : 4052 cf
S = 2.05 S = 0.20
0.2S= 0.41 0.2S = 0.04
Peak Runoff Hydrograph
0.3
0.3
0.2
(13
0.2
0
0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Time in Minutes
File:SBUH-24 10 YEAR PRE.xrs
7/14/2014 CESINW, Inc. Page 1
C E S N Y r Project: JIBC
1 Project Number: 2967
SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH Date: 07/11/14
SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION
Basin: ON-SITE ADD
Event: 25 YEAR PRE-DEV
Given:
Area= 0.62 acres
Pt = 3.9 inches
dt = 10 min.
Tc = 14 min.
w = 0.2632 routing constant
Pervious Area Impervious Area HYDROGRAPH RESULTS
Area= 0.62 acres Area = 0 acres Peak Runoff 0.31 cfs
CN = 83 CN = 98 Total Vol. : 4908 cf
S = 2.05 S = 0.20
0.23= 0.41 0.2S = 0.04
Peak Runoff Hydrograph
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
U
0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Time in Minutes
File:SBUH-24 25 YEAR PRE.xls
7/14/2014 CESINW,Inc. Page 1
Project: JOG
C E S NW Project Number: 2967
SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH Date: 07/11/14
SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION
Basin: ON-SITE ADD
Event: 2 YEAR POST-DEV
Given:
Area= 0.62 acres
Pt = 2.5 inches
dt = 10 min.
Tc = 8 min.
w = 0.3846 routing constant
Pervious Area Impervious Area HYDROGRAPH RESULTS
Area= 0.4 acres Area = 0.22 acres Peak Runoff 0.23 cfs
CN = 83 CN = 98 Total Vol.: 3331 cf
S = 2.05 S = 0.20
0.2S= 0.41 0.2S = 0.04
Peak Runoff Hydrograph
0.3
0.2
0.2
CO
V
e
0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Time in Minutes
File:SBUH-24 2 YEAR POST.xls
7/14/2014 CESINW, Inc. Page 1
W Project: JIBC
C E S 1 ` Project Number: 2967
SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH Date: 07/11/14
SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION
Basin: ON-SITE ADD
Event: 10 YEAR POST-DE_V
Given:
Area= 0.62 acres
Pt = 3,45 inches
dt = 10 min.
Tc = 8 min.
w = 0.3846 routing constant
Pervious Area Impervious Area HYDROGRAPH RESULTS
Area= 0.4 acres Area = 0.22 acres Peak Runoff 0.36 cfs
CN = 83 CN = 98 Total Vol. : 5184 cf
S = 2.05 S = 0.20
0.2S= 0.41 0.2S = 0.04
Peak Runoff Hydrograph
0.4
0.4 -
0.3
0.3
V
0.2
0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Time in Minutes
File:SBUH-24 10 YEAR POST.xls
7/14/2014 CESINW,Inc. Page 1
Project: J1BC
cEs Nw
Project Number: 2967
SANTA BARBARA URBAN HYDROGRAPH Date: 07/11/14
SCS TYPE 1A 24-HOUR DISTRIBUTION
Basin: ON-SITE ADD
Event: 25 YEAR POST-DEV
Given:
Area= 0.62 acres
Pt = 3.9 inches
dt = 10 min.
Tc = 8 min.
w = 0.3846 routing constant
Pervious Area Impervious Area HYDROGRAPH RESULTS
Area= 0.4 acres Area = 0.22 acres Peak Runoff 0.43 cfs
CN = 83 CN = 98 Total Vol. : 6095 cf
S = 2.05 S = 0.20
0.2S= 0.41 0.2S = 0.04
Peak Runoff Hydrograph
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
U 0.3
.0 0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Time in Minutes
File:SBUH•24 25 YEAR POST.xls
7/14/2014 CESINW,Inc. Page 1
IBC
C L S T T T Number:: 296
N W Project 2967
Date: 7/14/14
POND STORAGE ROUTING Basin: Dev. Area Only
Event: 2 Year
Pond Data: Outlet Data:
Bot. L = 64 feet Orif1 A= 0.046 sq.ft. Broad Crested
Bot.W = 13 feet Orif1 E= 0 Weirl L= 0 feet
Side SI = 3 Horizontal : 1 Vertical Dia 1 = 2.90 inches Weir1 E= 0
Area = 832 Bottom Area in Sq.Ft.
Height 0= 0 Elevation Orif2 A= 0.06 sq.ft. Rectangular
Beg Sto= 0 cu.ft. Orif2 E= 0.3 Weir2 L= 0 feet
Dia 2 = 3.32 inches Weir2 E= 0
Orif3 A= 0 35 sq.ft.
MAX STORAGE = 286.7 cu ft Orif3 E= 0.4
MAX OUTLET= 0.13 cfs Dia 3 = 8.01 inches
Pond Outflow Hydrograph
0.3
i
0.2
•
1
1 0.2 -t- -
co 0 , L U
0.1 --
3
0
LT.
0.1 H „i C _.
i ii 1 iiii
l . _...
I 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 16D0
-0.1
Time in Minutes
—Routed Hydrograph Inflow Hydrograph
File:POND 2 YEAR.xls
7/14/2014 CESINW, Inc. Page 1
C E S N W 2 Project: 6C
Project Number: 967
Date: 7/14/14
POND STORAGE ROUTING Basin: Dev. Area Omly
Event: 10 Year
Pond Data: Outlet Data:
Bot. L = 64 feet Orif1 A= 0.046 sq.ft. Broad Crested
Bot.W = 13 feet Orifl E= 0 • Weir1 L= 0 feet
Side SI= 3 Horizontal : 1 Vertical Dia 1 = 2.90 inches Weir1 E= 0
Area = 832 Bottom Area in Sq. Ft.
Height 0= 0 Elevation Orif2 A= 0.06 sq.ft. Rectangular
Beg Sto= 0 cu.ft. Orif2 E= 0.3 Weir2 L= 0 feet
Dia 2 = 3.32 inches Weir2 E= 0
Orif3 A= 0.35 sq.ft.
MAX STORAGE = 439.1 cu ft Orif3 E= 0.4
MAX OUTLET= 0.25 cfs Dia 3 = 8.01 inches
Pond Outflow Hydrograph
0.4
0.4
0.3 •
1
0.3
LL 0.2
U ij
c i
3
0 0.2
Er.
0.1 -
0.1
0.0
I 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1E310
-0.1
Time in Minutes
—Routed Hydrograph - -Inflow Hydrograph
File:POND 10 YEAR.xls
7/14/2014 CESINW, Inc. Page 1
C �L, ^`\J N , T Project: 2 W Project Number: 2967
Date: 7/14/14
POND STORAGE ROUTING Basin: Dev. Area Only
Event: 25 YEAR
Pond Data: Outlet Data:
Bot.L = 64 feet Orif1 A= 0.046 sq.ft. Broad Crested
Bot.W = 13 feet Orif1 E= 0 Weir1 L= 0 feet
Side SI= 3 Horizontal: 1 Vertical Dia 1 = 2.90 inches Weir1 E= 0
Area = 832 Bottom Area in Sq. Ft.
Height 0= 0 Elevation Orif2 A= 0.06 sq.ft. Rectangular
Beg Sto= 0 cu.ft. Orif2 E= 0.3 Weir2 L= 0 feet
Dia 2 = 3.32 inches Weir2 E= 0
Orif3 A= 0.6 sq.ft.
MAX STORAGE = 582.3 cu ft Orif3 E= 0.4
MAX OUTLET= 0.25 cfs Dia 3 = 10.49 inches
Pond Outflow Hydrograph
0.5
0.4 iI
0.4 - - 1
•
0.3
v 0.3 1
I
c I
3
0 0.2
u_
0.2
0.1 j
I t'
0.0 — IIII
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Time in Minutes
—Routed Hydrograph -Inflow Hydrograph
File:POND 25 YEAR.xds
7/14/2014 CESINW,Inc. Page 1
Pond Storage vs. Outflow
Height Storage Top Top Surf Area OUTLETS t= 600 sec
(ft) (cu ft) Length Width (sq ft) OR/F1 ORIF2 ORIF3 WEIR1 WE1R2 Sit 2Sit O+2S/t
0 0 64 13 832 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.1 86 64.6 13.6 879 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4
0.2 176 65.2 14.2 926 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.7
0.3 271 65.8 14.8 974 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.9 1.0
0.4 371 66.4 15.4 1023 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.2 1.5
0.5 475 67 16 1072 0.2 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.6 2.9
0.6 585 67.6 16.6 1122 0.2 0.2 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.9 3.7
0.7 700 68.2 17.2 1173 0.2 0.2 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.2 2.3 4.5
0.8 820 68.8 17.8 1225 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 2.7 5.2
0.9 945 69.4 18.4 1277 0.2 0.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 1.6 3.1 5.9
1 1075 70 19 1330 0.2 0.3 2.5 0.0 0.0 1.8 3.6 8.6
1.1 1211 70.6 19.6 1384 0.3 0.3 2.7 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 7.2
1.2 1352 71.2 20.2 1438 0.3 0.3 2.8 0.0 0.0 2.3 4.5 7.9
1.3 1498 71.8 20.8 1493 0.3 0.3 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 5.0 8.6
1.4 1651 72.4 21.4 1549 0.3 0.3 3.2 0.0 0.0 2.8 5.5 9.3
1.5 1808 73 22 1606 0.3 0.3 3.3 0.0 0.0 3.0 6.0 10.0
1.6 1972 73.6 22.6 1663 0.3 0.4 3.5 0.0 0.0 3.3 6.6 10.7
1.7 2141 74.2 23.2 1721 0.3 0.4 3.6 0.0 0.0 3.6 7.1 11.5
1.8 2316 74.8 23.8 1780 0.3 0.4 3.8 0.0 0.0 3.9 7.7 12.2
1.9 2497 75.4 24.4 1840 0.3 0.4 3.9 0.0 0.0 4.2 8.3 13.0
2 2684 76 25 1900 0.3 0.4 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 8.9 13.7
2.1 2877 76.6 25.6 1961 0.4 0.4 4.1 0.0 0.0 4.8 9.6 14.5
2.2 3076 77.2 26.2 2023 0.4 0.4 4.3 0.0 0.0 5.1 10.3 15.3
2.3 3282 77.8 26.8 2085 0.4 0.4 4.4 0.0 0.0 5.5 10.9 16.1
2.4 3493 78.4 27.4 2148 0.4 0.5 4.5 0.0 0.0 5.8 11.6 17.0
2.5 3711 79 28 2212 0.4 0.5 4.6 0.0 0.0 6.2 12.4 17.8
2.6 3936 79.6 28.6 2277 0.4 0.5 4.7 0.0 0.0 6.6 13.1 18.7
2.7 4167 80.2 29.2 2342 0.4 0.5 4.8 0.0 0.0 6.9 13.9 19.6
2.8 4404 80.8 29.8 2408 0.4 0.5 4.9 0.0 0.0 7.3 14.7 20.5
2.9 4648 81.4 30.4 2475 0.4 0.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 7.7 15.5 21.4
3 4899 82 31 2542 0.4 0.5 5.1 0.0 0.0 8.2 16.3 22.4
3.1 5157 82.6 31.6 2610 0.4 0.5 5.2 0.0 0.0 8.6 17.2 23.4
3.2 5421 83.2 32.2 2679 0.4 0.5 5.3 0.0 0.0 9.0 18.1 24.4
3.3 5693 83.8 32.8 2749 0.4 0.6 5.4 0.0 0.0 9.5 19.0 25.4
3.4 5971 84.4 33.4 2819 0.4 0.6 5.5 0.0 0.0 10.0 19.9 26.4
3.5 6256 85 34 2890 0.5 0.6 5.6 0.0 0.0 10.4 20.9 27.5
3.6 6549 85.6 34.6 2962 0.5 0.6 5.7 0.0 0.0 10.9 21.8 28.6
3.7 6849 86.2 35.2 3034 0.5 0.6 5.8 0.0 0.0 11.4 22.8 29.7
3.8 7156 86.8 35.8 3107 0.5 0.6 5.9 0.0 0.0 11.9 23.9 30.8
3.9 7470 87.4 36.4 3181 0.5 0.6 5.9 0.0 0.0 12.5 24.9 31.9
4 7792 88 37 3256 0.5 0.6 6.0 0.0 0.0 13.0 26.0 33.1
4.1 8122 88.6 37.6 3331 0.5 0.6 6.1 0.0 0.0 13.5 27.1 34.3
4.2 8459 89.2 38.2 3407 0.5 0.6 6.2 0.0 0.0 14.1 28.2 35.5
4.3 8803 89.8 38.8 3484 0.5 0.6 6.3 0.0 0.0 14.7 29.3 36.8
4.4 9155 90.4 39.4 3562 0.5 0.6 6.4 0.0 0.0 15.3 30.5 38.0
4.5 9516 91 40 3640 0.5 0.7 6.4 0.0 0.0 15.9 31.7 39.3
4.6 9883 91.6 40.6 3719 0.5 0.7 6.5 0.0 0.0 16.5 32.9 40.6
4.7 . 10259 92.2 41.2 3799 0.5 0.7 6.6 0.0 0.0 17.1 34.2 42.0
4.8 10643 92.8 41.8 3879 0.5 0.7 6.7 0.0 0.0 17.7 35.5 43.4
4.9 11035 93.4 42.4 3960 0.5 0.7 6.7 0.0 0.0 18.4 36.8 44.7
5 11435 94 43 4042 0.5 0.7 6.8 0.0 0.0 19.1 38.1 46.2
5.1 11844 94.6 43.6 4125 0.6 0.7 6.9 0.0 0.0 19.7 39.5 47.6
5.2 12260 95.2 44.2 4208 0.6 0.7 7.0 0.0 0.0 20.4 40.9 49.1
5.3 12685 95.8 44.8 4292 0.6 0.7 7.0 0.0 0.0 21.1 42.3 50.6
5.4 13119 96.4 45.4 4377 0.8 0.7 7.1 0.0 0.0 21.9 43.7 52.1
5.5 13561 97 46 4462 0.6 0.7 7.2 0.0 0.0 22.6 45.2 53.7
5.6 14011 97.6 46.6 4548 0.6 0.7 7.2 0.0 0.0 23.4 46.7 55.3
5.7 14470 98.2 47.2 4635 0.6 0.7 7.3 0.0 0.0 24.1 48.2 56.9
5.8 14938 98.8 47.8 4723 0.6 0.7 7.4 0.0 0.0 24.9 49.8 58.5
5.9 15415 99.4 48.4 4811 0.6 0.8 7.5 0.0 0.0 25.7 51.4 . 60.2
6 15900 100 49 4900 0.6 0.8 7.5 0.0 0.0 26.5 53.0 61.9
6.1 16395 100.6 49.6 4990 0.6 0.8 7.6 0.0 0.0 27.3 54.6 63.6
6.2 16898 101.2 50.2 5080 0.6 0.8 7.7 0.0 0.0 28.2 56.3 65.4
6.3 17411 101.8 50.8 5171 0.6 0.8 7.7 0.0 0.0 29.0 58.0 67.1
6.4 17933 102.4 51.4 5263 0.6 0.8 7.8 0.0 0.0 29.9 59.8 69.0
6.5 18464 103 52 5356 0.6 0.8 7.8 0.0 0.0 30.8 61.5 70.8
6.6 19004 103.6 52.6 5449 0.6 0.8 7.9 0.0 0.0 31.7 63.3 72.7
6.7 19554 104.2 53.2 5543 0.6 0.8 8.0 0.0 0.0 32.6 65.2 74.6
6.8 20113 104.8 53.8 5638 0.6 0.8 8.0 0.0 0.0 33.5 67.0 76.5
•
File:POND 25 YEAR.xls
7/14/2014 CESINW,Inc. Page 1
24-HOUR RAINFALL DEPTHS
RECURRENCE TOTAL
INTERVAL PRECIPITATION
(YEARS) DEPTH (INCHES)
2 2.50
5 3. 10
10 3.45
25 3.90
50 4.20
100 4.50
24-HOUR
RAINFALL DEPTHS CleanWate� Services
DRAWING NO. 1280 REVISED 12-06 Our commitment is clear.
g 1.�, w,';\
I . 9,ELIMIN :Y
..ssooM
',It
Gw:nM
Imcen—'4
U
0
J
.OE .OE _.. m
a. # G
zF s
g S via:i g
HISS
U l' r
m 'g29
3AY H0 MSS
1 , 11, , i
i I 1 , , ,
,, ,
1n EE
ER
1W 192.9 IlF.:1 ON 191.1 A A
y TW 191.-
SW 390.E Z gel
1 Milli I! lilt.— 97 19.9
. L
W
/ TW 199.9 E.
I . w
1i j TOG °r za . I V C..)9w�„ a. � z
w
} �MS�� ` qq
T 3925 8 883.9WEOxIRDL p
B 922 iW I96.AS� IaE
' EL 190.00 j �SW 159.3 OW 185.9
°W 197.0 INPERnWiMG SUMMARY -RIP-RAP
W 191.s
L 1 BW 1I9.9 I WATER QUALITY SHEET FLOW
'� I ADETEM1OH POND vOOI WAM S1655P DISCHARGE
SW 199.0 ' •
• /� WALK 1(LCss OH)3515E
wuxl h+s9 OH)as.n I
i. y#9} R wAa3(aSs oH)Tn sr
' 1W I95.5 * 6� R1RMPounEr J 9UWC 9WHf I[X ROW)fOl6E
9w 190.0N.
!p Sao rnox �tl 'RMO PO?9CURB 10595E
1 E9 i TOTAL MEW IMPERVIOUS•11122 Sr
/' gv C[
ROW neenvious a
• MRRIC SILA UM ROW)603 5E
,"•� a NEW ROAD EMIT 9 CURE 135E 5F Z
PavAre wRocS IXSO ROW 35 SF
//J///JI/S P. / 101K ROW IMP-16985E(FEE IN I➢GI!) 'S' d
HYDROLOGIC TOTAL COWFTI mxc AREA 27,216 Sv I—
HYDROLOGIC GROUP D BAaN RaoFARFAemss GC BOUND'Vlr GROUP C/D 19488 SF WALA AREAS 1335 SF
ass WALK IN ROW ps SF) f
7728 SF SOIL SURVEY Ce
BOIL GROUP TOTAL NEW IMP Ox.SITE-W WA SF(0.21 ACRES) 29 0
BOUNDARY
SAY croon SIC GROUP w AWA CH- . -91.s 2..
AN A
HYDROLOGIC GROUP O CM-Bf
®wE[GHICx(m2S 1).(15488 Wv R 3I5 1
Ix_M1.30.EEI I WEIGHTED CM-S3.15 SAY CH-83
20 IU 0 SI PRELIMINARY FOR REVIEW ONLY 1
s
SeoP ifiC
rngineenn,.Inc
Real-World Geotechnical Solutions
Investigation•Design•Construction Support
February 24,2010
Project No: 10-1934
Peter Ladley
Japanese International Baptist Church
8500 SW Spruce Street
Tigard,Oregon 97223
Copy: Steve Roper, SR Design LLC
Via e-mail with hard copies mailed
Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Report
Japanese International Baptist Church
Structural Addition and Parking Lot Improvements
8500 SW Spruce Street
Tigard,Oregon
At your request,GeoPacific Engineering, Inc.(GeoPacific)performed a geotechnical engineering study
for the proposed structural addition and parking lot improvements located at 8500 SW Spruce Street in
Tigard,Oregon. The purpose of this study was to evaluate subsurface conditions at the site and to provide
geotechnical recommendations for site development. This geotechnical study was performed in
accordance with GeoPacific Proposal No. P-3568,dated May 22,2009, and your subsequent
authorization of our proposal and General Conditions for Geotechnical Services.
SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The site is located at 8500 SW Spruce Street in Tigard,Oregon (Figures I and 2). The proposed
improvements will consist of an"L"-shaped addition to the existing church building, on the north side. A
portable building currently occupying this area will be moved. The addition will have a basement if
feasible,and will extend westward onto property recently obtained by the church. It is our understanding
that the pond located to the south of the existing structure will be enlarged. A grading plan for the project
has not yet been completed: however, we anticipate excavation cuts and fills will be minimal.
Excavations up to about 10 feet deep are anticipated for the basement.
REGIONAL GEOLOGIC SETTING
Regionally,the subject site lies within the Willamette Valley/Puget Sound lowland, a broad structural
depression situated between the Coast Range on the west and the Cascade Range on the east. A series of
discontinuous faults subdivide the Willamette Valley into a mosaic of fault-bounded,structural blocks
(Yeats et al., 1996). Uplifted structural blocks form bedrock highlands, while down-warped structural
blocks form sedimentary basins.
The subject site is underlain by the Quaternary age(last 1.6 million years)Willamette Formation, a
catastrophic flood deposit associated with repeated glacial outburst flooding of the Willamette Valley
13910 SW Galbreath Drive,Suite 102 Tel(503)625-4455
Sherwood,Oregon 97140 Fax(503)625-4405
-1
February 24,2010
GeoPacific Project No. 10-1934
river system(Madin, 1990). These deposits consist of horizontally layered,micaceous,fine silt to coarse
sand forming poorly-defined to distinct beds less than 3 feet thick. Underlying the Willamette Formation
is Miocene aged(about 14.5 to 16.5 million years ago)Columbia River Basalt,a thick sequence of lava
flows which forms the basement of the basin.
At least three major source zones capable of generating damaging earthquakes are thought to exist in the
vicinity of the subject site. These include the Gales Creek-Newberg-Mt. Angel Structural Zone,the
Portland Hills Fault Zone,and the Cascadia Subduction Zone.
Portland Hills Fault Zone
The Portland Hills Fault Zone is a series of NW-trending faults that include the central Portland Hills Fault,
the western Oatfield Fault,and the eastern East Bank Fault. These faults occur in a northwest-trending
zone that varies in width between 3.5 and 5.0 miles. The combined three faults vertically displace the
Columbia River Basalt by 1,130 feet and appear to control thickness changes in late Pleistocene(appmx.
780,000 years)sediment(Madin, 1990). The Portland Hills Fault occurs along the Willamette River at the
base of the Portland Hills,and is about 6 miles northeast of the site. The Oatfield Fault occurs along the
western side of the Portland Hills,and is about 3.5 miles northeast of the site. The accuracy of the fault
mapping is stated to be within 500 meters(Wong,et al., 2000). No historical seismicity is correlated with
the mapped portion of the Portland Hills Fault Zone, but in 1991 a M3.5 earthquake occurred on a NW-
trending shear plane located 1.3 miles east of the fault(Yelin, 1992). Although there is no definitive
evidence of recent activity,the Portland Hills Fault Zone is assumed to be potentially active(Geomatrix
Consultants, 1995).
Gales Creek-Newberg-Mt.Angel Structural Zone
The Gales Creek-Newberg-Mt.Angel Structural Zone is a 50-mile-long zone of discontinuous,NW-
trending faults that lies about 15 miles southwest of the subject site. These faults are recognized in the
subsurface by vertical separation of the Columbia River Basalt and offset seismic reflectors in the overlying
basin sediment(Yeats et al., 1996; Werner et al., 1992). A geologic reconnaissance and photogeologic
analysis study conducted for the Scoggins Dam site in the Tualatin Basin revealed no evidence of deformed
geomorphic surfaces along the structural zone(Unruh et al., 1994). No seismicity has been recorded on the
Gales Creek or Newberg Fault(the fault closest to the subject site); however,these faults are considered to
be potentially active because they may connect with the seismically active Mount Angel Fault and the
rupture plane of the 1993 M5.6 Scotts Mills earthquake(Werner et al. 1992;Geomatrix Consultants, 1995).
Cascadia Subduction Zone
The Cascadia Subduction Zone is a 680-mile-long zone of active tectonic convergence where oceanic
crust of the Juan de Fuca Plate is subducting beneath the North American continent at a rate of 4 cm per
year(Goldfinger et al., 1996). A growing body of geologic evidence suggests that prehistoric subduction
zone earthquakes have occurred(Atwater, 1992;Carver, 1992; Peterson et al., 1993;Geomatrix
Consultants, 1995). This evidence includes:(1) buried tidal marshes recording episodic, sudden
subsidence along the coast of northern California,Oregon,and Washington,(2) burial of subsided tidal
marshes by tsunami wave deposits,(3) paleoliquefaction features, and(4)geodetic uplift patterns on the
Oregon coast. Radiocarbon dates on buried tidal marshes indicate a recurrence interval for major
subduction zone earthquakes of 250 to 650 years with the last event occurring 300 years ago(Atwater,
1992;Carver, 1992; Peterson et al., 1993; Geomatrix Consultants, 1995). The inferred seismogenic
portion of the plate interface lies roughly along the Oregon Coast at depths of 20 and 40 kilometers below
the ocean surface.
10-1914-Japanese International Raplisl Church GR 2 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING,INC.
February 24,2010
GeoPacific Project No. 10-1934
FIELD EXPLORATION
The site-specific exploration for this study was conducted on February 3,2010 and consisted of
exploratory borings and test pits. Three exploratory borings(designated B-1 through B-3)were drilled to
depths of 6.5 to 21.5 feet,at the approximate locations shown on Figure 2. Two exploratory test pits,
designated TP-I and TP-2,were excavated with a trackhoe to depths of approximately 8 feet,at
approximate locations shown on Figure 2. It should be noted that exploration locations were determined
in the field by pacing or taping distances from apparent property corners and other site features shown on
the plans provided. As such,the locations of the explorations should be considered approximate.
The boreholes were drilled using a trailer-mounted drill rig and solid stem auger methods. At boring B-I,
SPT(Standard Penetration Test)sampling was performed in general accordance with ASTM D1586 using
a 2-inch outside diameter split-spoon sampler and a 140-pound hammer equipped with a rope and cathead
mechanism. During the test,a sample is obtained by driving the sampler 18 inches into the soil with the
hammer free-falling 30 inches. The number of blows for each 6 inches of penetration is recorded. The
Standard Penetration Resistance("N-value")of the soil is calculated as the number of blows required for
the final 12 inches of penetration. If 50 or more blows are recorded within a single 6-inch interval,the
test is terminated, and the blow count is recorded as 50 blows for the number of inches driven. This
resistance,or N-value, provides a measure of the relative density of granular soils and the relative
consistency of cohesive soils. At the completion of the borings, the holes were backfilled with bentonite.
At the completion of the test pit logging,the test pits were backfilled with the excavated spoils and tamped
with the backhoe bucket. This backfill should not be expected to behave as compacted structural fill and
some minor settling of the ground surface may occur.
Explorations were conducted under the full-time observation of GeoPacific personnel. Soil samples
obtained from the boring were classified in the field and representative portions were placed in relatively
air-tight plastic bags. These soil samples were then returned to the laboratory for further examination and
laboratory testing. Pertinent information including soil sample depths,stratigraphy, soil engineering
characteristics,and groundwater occurrence was recorded. Soils were classified in general accordance
with the Unified Soil Classification System.
Summary borehole and test pit logs are attached. The stratigraphic contacts shown on the individual
borehole logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. The actual transitions may be
more gradual. The soil and groundwater conditions depicted are only for the specific dates and locations
reported,and therefore,are not necessarily representative of other locations and times.
Pavement Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Testing
On February 3,2010, two Pavement Dynamic Cone Penetrometer(PDCP)tests were conducted to
determine the strength parameters of the native soil for support of pavement. Correlated California
Bearing Ratio(CBR)value at the test location is indicated on Table I.
10-1934-Japanese International Baplisi Church GR 3 GEoPACIFIC ENGINEERING,INC.
February 24, 2010
GeoPacific Project No. 10-1934
shoring,excavating conditions, recommendations for below grade retaining walls,footing drains,seismic
design, utility trenches, pavement sections,storm water pond expansion,and erosion control
considerations.
Site Preparation
Proposed structure and parking areas should first be cleared of vegetation and any loose debris and debris
from clearing should be removed from the site. Organic-rich topsoil should then be stripped. Although
native topsoil depths were not measured during our investigation,we anticipate that the depth of stripping
will range from about 9 to 12 inches. The final depth of stripping removal should be determined on the
basis of a site inspection after the initial stripping has been performed. Stripped topsoil should be
stockpiled only in designated areas and stripping operations should be observed and documented by
GeoPacific.
Undocumented fill within the proposed building footprint, beneath pavements or other settlement-
sensitive improvements, should be completely removed and replaced with engineered fill. Undocumented
fill up to about 3 feet deep was encountered in borings 8-1, B-3 and test pits TP-I and TP-2. The
undocumented fill materials are likely suitable for reuse as engineered fill provided they are free of highly
organic material and debris. We recommend full-time monitoring by GeoPacific during the removal
period to assist in identifying materials suitable for re-use as engineered fill,and to verify that these soils
are not mixed with organics or debris.
If encountered within the proposed building footprint,soft to medium stiff soils may need to be
overexcavated and replaced with engineered fill. The depth of over-excavation should be determined on
the basis of a foundation excavation observation during construction.
Following removal of surficial topsoil and undocumented fill,the exposed subgrade should be ripped or
tilled to a depth of 12 inches,moisture conditioned,and compacted in-place prior to the placement of
engineered fill or crushed aggregate base for pavement. Exposed subgrade soils should be evaluated by
GeoPacific. For large areas, this evaluation is normally performed by proof-rolling the exposed subgrade
with a fully loaded scraper or dump truck. For smaller areas where access is restricted, the subgrade
should be evaluated by probing the soil with a steel probe. Soft/loose soils identified during subgrade
preparation should be compacted to a firm and unyielding condition or over-excavated and replaced with
engineered fill,as described below. The depth of overexcavation, if required, should be evaluated by
GeoPacific at the time of construction.
Engineered Fill
In general,we anticipate that soils from planned cuts and utility trench excavations will be suitable for use
as engineered fill provided they are adequately moisture conditioned prior to compacting. Imported fill
material should be reviewed by GeoPacific prior to being imported to the site. Oversize material greater
than 6 inches in size should not be used within 3 feet of foundation footings, and material greater than 12
inches in diameter should not be used in engineered fill.
Engineered fill should be compacted in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches using standard compaction
equipment. We recommend that engineered fill be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry
density determined by ASTM D 1557(Modified Proctor)or equivalent. On-site soils may be wet or dry
of optimum;therefore,we anticipate that moisture conditioning of native soil will be necessary for
compaction operations.
Proper test frequency and earthwork documentation usually requires daily observation and testing during
stripping, rough grading,and placement of engineered fill. Field density testing should generally conform
IO-1934-Japanese International Baptist Church GR 5 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING,INC.
February 24,2010
GeoPacific Project No. 10-1934
to ASTM D2922 and D3017,or D1556. Engineered fill should be periodically observed and tested by the
project geotechnical engineer or his representative. Typically,one density test is performed for at least
every 2 vertical feet of fill placed or every 500 cubic yards,whichever requires more testing. Because
testing is performed on an on-call basis,we recommend that the earthwork contractor be held
contractually responsible for test scheduling and frequency.
Wet Weather Earthwork
The on-site soils are moisture sensitive and may be difficult to handle or traverse with construction
equipment during periods of wet weather. Earthwork is typically most economical when performed under
dry weather conditions. Earthwork performed during the wet-weather season will probably require
expensive measures such as cement treatment or imported granular material to compact fill to the
recommended engineering specifications. If earthwork is to be performed or fill is to be placed in wet
weather or under wet conditions when soil moisture content is difficult to control,the following
recommendations should be incorporated into the contract specifications.
• Earthwork should be performed in small areas to minimize exposure to wet weather. Excavation
or the removal of unsuitable soils should be followed promptly by the placement and compaction
of clean engineered fill. The size and type of construction equipment used may have to be limited
to prevent soil disturbance. Under some circumstances, it may be necessary to excavate soils
with a backhoe to minimize subgrade disturbance caused by equipment traffic;
• The ground surface within the construction area should be graded to promote run-off of surface
water and to prevent the ponding of water;
• Material used as engineered fill should consist of clean, granular soil containing less than 5
percent fines. The fines should be non-plastic. Alternatively,cement treatment of on-site soils
may be performed to facilitate wet weather placement;
• The ground surface within the construction area should be sealed by a smooth drum vibratory
roller,or equivalent,and under no circumstances should be left uncompacted and exposed to
moisture. Soils which become too wet for compaction should be removed and replaced with
clean granular materials;
• Excavation and placement of fill should be observed by the geotechnical engineer to verify that
all unsuitable materials are removed and suitable compaction and site drainage is achieved;and
• Bales of straw and/or geotextile silt fences should be strategically located to control erosion.
If cement or lime treatment is used to facilitate wet weather construction, GeoPacific should be contacted
to provide additional recommendations and field monitoring.
Structural Foundations
Based on our understanding of the proposed project and the results of our exploration program,and
assuming our recommendations for site preparation are followed, medium stiff to stiff native deposits
and/or engineered fill soils will be encountered at or near the foundation level of the proposed structures.
To provide adequate foundation support, we recommend a minimum of 12 inches of compacted%"-0
crushed rock be placed below the bottoms of footings. Crushed rock placed beneath footings should be
compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of Modified Proctor(ASTM D1557)or equivalent. This 12-inch
thick rock section should extend horizontally beyond the footings a minimum of 12 inches from both the
outside and inside edge of the footings.
10.1934-Japanese International Baptist Chinch GR 6 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING,INC.
February 24,2010
GeoPacific Project No. 10-1934
Shallow,conventional isolated or continuous spread footings may be used to support the proposed
structure,provided they are founded on the above recommended I2-inch-thick crushed rock section
placed on competent native soils,or compacted engineered fill placed directly upon the competent native
soils. We recommend a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot(psf) for
designing the footings. The recommended maximum allowable bearing pressure may be increased by a
factor of 1.33 for short term transient conditions such as wind and seismic loading. All footings should
be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade. Minimum footing widths should
be determined by the project engineer/architect in accordance with applicable design codes.
Assuming construction is accomplished as recommended herein,and for the foundation loads anticipated,
we estimate total settlement of spread foundations of less than about 1 inch and differential settlement
between two adjacent load-bearing components supported on competent soil of less than about%s inch.
We anticipate that the majority of the estimated settlement will occur during construction,as loads are
applied.
Wind,earthquakes,and unbalanced earth loads will subject the proposed structure to lateral forces.
Lateral forces on a structure will be resisted by a combination of sliding resistance of its base or footing
on the underlying soil and passive earth pressure against the buried portions of the structure. For use in
design,a coefficient of friction of 0.5 may be assumed along the interface between the base of the footing
and subgrade soils. Passive earth pressure for buried portions of structures may be calculated using an
equivalent fluid weight of 390 pounds per cubic foot(pef),assuming footings are cast against dense,
natural soils or engineered fill. The recommended coefficient of friction and passive earth pressure values
do not include a safety factor. The upper 12 inches of soil should be neglected in passive pressure
computations unless it is protected by pavement or slabs on grade.
Footing excavations should be trimmed neat and the bottom of the excavation should be carefully
prepared. Loose,wet or otherwise softened soil should be removed from the footing excavation prior to
placing crushed rock. GeoPacific should observe foundation excavations prior to placement of crushed
rock and should test the compaction of the crushed rock prior to placing reinforcing steel and formwork,
to verify that an appropriate bearing stratum has been encountered and that soils are suitable to support
the planned loads.
The above foundation recommendations are for dry weather conditions. Due to the high moisture
sensitivity of engineered fill and native soils,construction during wet weather is likely to require
overexcavation of footings and backfill with additional compacted,crushed aggregate. As a result of this
condition,we recommend foundation excavations be observed to verify subgrade strength.
Basement Wall Setbacks and Shoring Issues
We understand that the proposed structural addition may incorporate a basement. "Temporary excavations
for basement construction may be planned no steeper than I H:1 V(Horizontal:Vertical). Where
excavations extend along the north side of the existing building,a horizontal bench at least 2 feet wide
should be left at the top of the slope before beginning the temporary excavation. If the basement
excavation will need to extend closer to the existing building than allowed by the above
recommendations,additional support measures will need to be installed to protect the existing structure
during construction. Such measures might include underpinning the existing structure and/or temporary
shoring walls such as soldier piling or soil nail walls. GeoPacific should be contacted for additional
recommendations and/or design of temporary shoring systems if needed.
10-1934-Japanese Intnnehonal Baptist Church OR 7 GeoPACIFIC ENGINEERING,INC.
February 24,2010
GeoPacific Project No. 10-1934
GeoPacific should be contacted during construction to verify subgrade strength in wall keyway
excavations,to verify that backslope soils are in accordance with our assumptions,and to take density
tests on the wall backfill materials.
Concrete Slab-on-Erade Floors
Preparation of areas beneath concrete slab-on-grade floors should be performed as recommended in the
Site Preparation section. Care should be taken during excavation for foundations and floor slabs,to
avoid disturbing subgrade soils. If subgrade soils have been adversely impacted by wet weather or
otherwise disturbed,the surficial soils should be scarified to a minimum depth of 8 inches,moisture
conditioned to within about 3 percent of optimum moisture content, and compacted to engineered fill
specifications. Alternatively, disturbed soils may be removed and the removal zone backfilled with
additional crushed rock.
For evaluation of the concrete slab-on-grade floors using the beam on elastic foundation method,a
modulus of subgrade reaction of 200 kcf(1 15 pci)should be assumed for the stiff native silt soils
anticipated at foundation depth. This value assumes the concrete slab system is designed and constructed
as recommended herein, with a minimum thickness of crushed rock of 6 inches beneath the slab.
Interior slab-on-grade floors should be provided with an adequate moisture break. The capillary break
material should consist of free-draining,clean crushed rock,with a maximum particle size of/. inch, no
more than 80 percent passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 5 percent fines(material passing the U.S.
Standard No.200 sieve). The minimum recommended thickness of capillary break materials on re-
compacted soil subgrade is 6 inches. The total thickness of crushed aggregate will be dependent on the
subgrade conditions at the time of construction,and should be verified visually by proof-rolling. Under-
slab aggregate should be compacted to at least 90 percent of Modified Proctor(ASTM D 1557)or
equivalent.
In areas where moisture will be detrimental to floor coverings or equipment inside the proposed structure,
appropriate vapor barrier and damp-proofing measures should be implemented. A commonly applied
vapor barrier system consists of a 10-mil polyethylene vapor barrier placed directly over the capillary
break material. With this type of system,an approximately 2-inch thick layer of sand is often placed over
the vapor barrier to protect it from damage,to aid in curing of the concrete, and also to help prevent
cement from bleeding down into the underlying capillary break materials. Other damp/vapor barrier
systems may also be feasible. Appropriate design professionals should be consulted regarding vapor
barrier and damp proofing systems, ventilation,building material selection and mold prevention issues,
which are outside GeoPacific's area of expertise.
Footing and Roof Drains
Due to the potential for perched surface water above fine grained deposits and engineered fill such as
those encountered at the site, we recommend the outside edge of perimeter footings be provided with a
drainage system consisting of 4-inch minimum diameter perforated PVC pipe embedded in a minimum of
1 ft per lineal foot of clean, free-draining sand and gravel or 1"- ''/"drain rock. The drain pipe and
surrounding drain rock should be wrapped in non-woven geotextile(Mirafi 140N,or approved
equivalent)to minimize the potential for clogging and/or ground loss due to piping. Water collected from
the footing drains should be directed into the local storm drain system or other suitable outlet. A
minimum 0.5 percent fall should be maintained throughout the drain and non-perforated pipe outlet. The
footing drains should include clean-outs to allow periodic maintenance and inspection.
Down spouts and roof drains should collect roof water in a system separate from the footing drains in
order to reduce the potential for clogging. Roof drain water should be directed to an appropriate
10-1934Japannne International Baptist Church GR 9 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING,INC.
February 24,2010
GeoPacific Project No. 10-1934
discharge point well away from structural foundations. Grades should be sloped downward and away
from buildings to reduce the potential for ponded water near structures.
Seismic Design
Structures should be designed to resist earthquake loading in accordance with the methodology described
in the 2006 International Building Code(IBC)with applicable 2007 Oregon Structural Specialty Code
(OSSC)revisions. We recommend Site Class D be used for design per the OSSC,Table 1613.5.2.
Design values determined for the site using the USGS(United States Geological Survey)Earthquake
Ground Motion Parameters utility are summarized below.
Table 2. Recommended Earthquake Ground Motion Parameters(2006 IBC/2007 OSSC)
Parameter Value
Location(Lat,Long),degrees 45.442,-122.764
Mapped Spectral Acceleration Values
(MCE,Site Class D):
Short Period, S, 0.951 g
1.0 Sec Period, Si 0.341 g
Soil Factors for Site Class D:
Fa —_ 1.12
_ Fy 1.72
SD.,=2/3 x Fa x S, 0.71 g_ _
SDI =2/3 x F,,x Si 0.39 g
Potential seismic impacts also include secondary effects such as soil liquefaction,fault rupture potential,and
other hazards as discussed below:
• Soil Liquefaction Potential—Soil liquefaction is a phenomenon wherein saturated soil
deposits temporarily lose strength and behave as a liquid in response to earthquake shaking.
Soil liquefaction is generally limited to loose,granular soils located below the water table.
On-site soils consist of medium stiff to stiff native silts that are considered to have a low
potential for liquefaction. Therefore, it is our opinion that no special design or construction
measures are needed to mitigate the effects of liquefaction.
• Fault Rupture Potential—Based on our review of available geologic literature,we are not
aware of any mapped active(demonstrating movement in the last 10,000 years)faults on the
site. During our field investigation, we did not observe any evidence of surface rupture or
recent faulting. Therefore,we conclude that the potential for fault rupture on site is very low.
• Effects of Local Geology and Topography—In our opinion, no additional seismic hazard
will occur due to local geology or topography. The site is expected to have no greater
seismic hazard than surrounding properties and the Tigard area in general.
Excavating Conditions
We anticipate that on-site soils can be excavated to depths anticipated for this project(up to about 10 feet)
using conventional heavy equipment such as scrapers and trackhoes. Maintenance of safe working
conditions, including temporary excavation stability, is the responsibility of the contractor. Actual slope
inclinations at the time of construction should be determined based on safety requirements and actual soil
10-I934-Japanese Intemational Baptist Church GR 10 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING,INC.
February 24, 2010
GeoPacific Project No. 10-1934
and groundwater conditions. All temporary cuts in excess of 4 feet in height should be sloped in
accordance with U.S. Occupational Safety and Heath Administration(OSHA)regulations(29 CFR Part
1926), or be shored. The existing native soils classify as Type B Soil and temporary excavation side
slope inclinations as steep as 1 H:I V may be assumed for planning purposes. This cut slope inclination is
applicable to excavations above the water table only.
Perched groundwater is likely to be encountered during the wet weather season and should be anticipated
in excavations and utility trenches. The contractor should be prepared to implement an appropriate
dewatering system for installation of the utilities. At this time, we anticipate that dewatering systems
consisting of ditches,sumps and pumps would be adequate for control of groundwater where encountered
during construction conducted during the dry season. Regardless of the dewatering system used, it should
be installed and operated such that in-place soils are prevented from being removed along with the
groundwater.
Vibrations created by traffic and construction equipment may cause some caving and raveling of
excavation walls. In such an event, lateral support for the excavation walls should be provided by the
contractor to prevent loss of ground support and possible distress to existing or previously constructed
structural improvements.
Utility Trenches
PVC pipe should be installed in accordance with the procedures specified in ASTM D232I. We
recommend that structural trench backfill be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density
obtained by Standard Proctor(ASTM D698)or equivalent. Initial backfill lift thick nesses for a 3/a"-0
crushed aggregate base may need to be as great as 4 feet to reduce the risk of flattening underlying
flexible pipe. Subsequent lift thickness should not exceed I foot. If imported granular fill material is
used,then the lifts for large vibrating plate-compaction equipment(e.g.hoe compactor attachments)may
be up to 2 feet, provided that proper compaction is being achieved and each lift is tested. Use of large
vibrating compaction equipment should be carefully monitored near existing structures and improvements
due to the potential for vibration-induced damage.
Adequate density testing should be performed during construction to verify that the recommended relative
compaction is achieved. Typically,at least one density test is taken for every 4 vertical feet of backfill on
each 200-lineal-foot section of trench.
Pavement Sections
Table 3 presents our recommended minimum pavement section for dry-weather construction conditions.
For design purposes,we used an estimated resilient modulus of 6,000 pci for compacted native soil. The
recommendations presented in Table 3 were formulated using a traffic index of 4.0,using the Crushed
Base Equivalent(CBE)method and an assumed design life(performance period)of 20 years.
The pavement sections recommended in Table 3 are for typical volumes of automobile traffic. Heavy
truck traffic will reduce the design life of the pavements and may lead to inadequate pavement
performance. If heavy truck traffic is anticipated,GeoPacific should be contacted for additional
pavement design recommendations based on the traffic volumes expected.
10-1914-Japanese International Baptist Church CR 1 I GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING,INC.
February 24,2010
GeoPacific Project No. 10-1934
Table 3-Recommended Minimum Dry-Weather Pavement Section
Layer Thickness(inches)
Material Layer Paved Driveway Gravel Parking Compaction Standard
and Parking Areas
Areas
Asphaltic Concrete(AC) 3 91%of Rice Density
AASHTO T-209
Crushed Aggregate Base'/."-0 95%of Modified Proctor
(leveling course) 2 2 ASTM D1557
Crushed Aggregate Base 1%Z"-0 8 I 0 95%of Modified Proctor
ASTM D1557
Recommended Subgrade 12 12 95%of Standard Proctor
or approved native
For the new parking area in the southeast portion of the site(Figure 2), it appears feasible to use the
existing crushed rock if final site grades will allow. Under this alternative,we recommend the existing
crushed rock section be supplemented with an additional 4 inches of crushed rock,and 3 inches of
asphaltic concrete. The existing pavement should be proof-rolled and any soft areas stabilized prior to
placing additional rock.
Native soil subgrade in pavement areas should be ripped or tilled to a minimum depth of 12 inches,
moisture conditioned,and recompacted in-place to at least 95 percent of ASTM D698(Standard Proctor)
or equivalent. In order to verify subgrade strength,we recommend proof-rolling directly on subgrade
with a loaded dump truck during dry weather and on top of base course in wet weather. Soft areas that
pump,rut,or weave should be stabilized prior to paving. If pavement areas are to be constructed during
wet weather,GeoPacific should review subgrade at the time of construction so that condition specific
recommendations can be provided. Wet-weather pavement construction is likely to require soil
amendment, or geotextile fabric and a 6-inch increase in base course thickness.
During placement of pavement section materials, density testing should be performed to verify
compliance with project specifications. Generally, one subgrade,one base course,and one asphalt
compaction test is performed for every 100 to 200 linear feet of paving.
Storm Water Pond Expansion
it is our opinion that the storm water pond may be enlarged,subject to the comments and additional
recommendations made below. We assume that the pond will incorporate fill berms or excavated cut
slopes. Finish slopes should be constructed no steeper than about 3H:lV(Horizontal:Vertical). Pond
berm slopes constructed in accordance with the recommendations of this report are anticipated to have
adequate factors of safety considering gross(overall)stability under static and seismic conditions.
New pond berm slopes should be provided with an adequate keyway at the base of the new fill. The
keyway should be a minimum of 2 feet deep and 8 feet wide(equipment width). The keyway should be
excavated through any soft,organic soil and into competent native materials. An 8-inch minimum
stripping depth should be maintained over the remainder of the base of the berm fill, with deeper
removals where necessary to remove organic topsoil. GeoPacific should verify that adequate subgrade
soils are exposed in the berm keyway, prior to berm fill placement.
Pond berm fill should consist of on-site clayey silt or silty clay material. Suitable materials are
anticipated to be available throughout the site, based on results of the above-referenced geotechnical
ID-1934-Japanese International Baptist Church GR 12 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING,INC.
Ii
February 24,2010
GeoPacific Project No. 10-1934
report. These fine-grained soils should be suitable for berm construction,and will not be susceptible to
internal erosion or piping provided they are adequately moisture conditioned and compacted.
Embankment fill should be placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches and compacted to at least 98 percent of
maximum dry density using Standard Proctor(ASTM D698)or equivalent. Soils should be moisture
conditioned and placed at or above optimum moisture content. Density testing should be performed at
least every 2 vertical feet of fill placed.
The on-site soils are moisture sensitive and earthwork will be most practical and cost-effective during the
dry season(see Wet Weather Earthwork section). If pond berm fills are placed during the wet season,
additional measures such as cement treatment would likely be needed. GeoPacific should be contacted
for additional recommendations if pond berm fills are to be placed during the wet season.
Any inlet or outlet pipes that extend through pond berm fills should include cutoff walls within the trench
area,placed at minimum 1 S-foot intervals. Cutoff walls should consist of bentonite amended fine-grained
soils,controlled density fill(CDF)or concrete. As an alternative to cutoff wall construction,the entire
pipe may be surrounded in CDF rather than pipe bedding material. Cutoff walls or CDF backfill will not
be needed if the pipe is laid concurrently with impervious fill placement, and the pipe is completely
surrounded in compacted impervious fill.
Erosion Control Considerations
During our field exploration program,we did not observe soil types that would be considered highly
susceptible to erosion. In our opinion,the primary concern regarding erosion potential will occur during
construction, in areas that have been stripped of vegetation. Erosion at the site during construction can be
minimized by implementing the project erosion control plan, which should include judicious use of straw
bales and silt fences. If used,these erosion control devices should be in place and remain in place
throughout site preparation and construction.
Erosion and sedimentation of exposed soils can also be minimized by quickly re-vegetating exposed areas
of soil,and by staging construction such that large areas of the project site are not denuded and exposed at
the same time. Areas of exposed soil requiring immediate and/or temporary protection against exposure
should be covered with either mulch or erosion control netting/blankets. Areas of exposed soil requiring
permanent stabilization should be seeded with an approved grass seed mixture,or hydroseeded with an
approved seed-mulch-fertilizer mixture.
UNCERTAINTIES AND LIMITATIONS
We have prepared this report for the owner and their consultants for use in design of this project only.
This report should be provided in its entirety to prospective contractors for bidding and estimating
purposes; however,the conclusions and interpretations presented in this report should not be construed as
a warranty of the subsurface conditions. Experience has shown that soil and groundwater conditions can
vary significantly over small distances. Inconsistent conditions can occur between explorations that may
not be detected by a geotechnical study. If,during future site operations,subsurface conditions are
encountered which vary appreciably from those described herein,GeoPacific should be notified for
review of the recommendations of this report,and revision of such if necessary.
Sufficient geotechnical monitoring,testing and consultation should be provided during construction to
confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by explorations.
Recommendations for design changes will be provided should conditions revealed during construction
differ from those anticipated,and to verify that the geotechnical aspects of construction comply with the
contract plans and specifications.
10-1934-Japanese IntemaLonal Baptist Church GR 13 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING,INC.
February 24,2010
GeoPacific Project No. 10-1934
Within the limitations of scope,schedule and budget,GeoPacific attempted to execute these services in
accordance with generally accepted professional principles and practices in the fields of geotechnical
engineering and engineering geology at the time the report was prepared. No warranty,express or
implied,is made. The scope of our work did not include environmental assessments or evaluations
regarding the presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous or toxic substances in the soil, surface water,
or groundwater at this site.
0.O
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service.
Sincerely,
GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING,INC. uf,D PRQFcSr.
(r."%G1 �F� 0
64.4:
��4809.6Q Z— -IQ
Tr L. HF
EXPIRES:06-30-20
Beth K. Rapp,G.I.T. Scott 1,. Hardman, P.E.
Project Geologist Principal Engineer
Attachments: References
Figure 1 —Vicinity Map
Figure 2—Site and Exploration Plan
Boring logs(B-1 through B-3)
Test pit logs(TP-1 and TP-2)
10.1914-Japanese International Baptist Church GE 14 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING,INC.
February 24,2010
GeoPacific Project No. I 0-1934
REFERENCES
Atwater, B.F., 1992,Geologic evidence for earthquakes during the past 2,000 years along the Copalis
River,southern coastal Washington: Journal of Geophysical Research,Vol. 97, p. 1901-1919.
Carver,G.A., 1992, Late Cenozoic tectonics of coastal northern California: American Association of
Petroleum Geologists-SEPM Field Trip Guidebook,May, 1992.
Geomatrix Consultants, 1995, Seismic Design Mapping, State of Oregon: unpublished report.
Goldfinger,C., Kulm, L.D., Yeats, R.S.,Applegate, B, MacKay, M.E.,and Cochrane, G.R., 1996, Active
strike-slip faulting and folding of the Cascadia Subduction-Zone plate boundary and forearc in central
and northern Oregon: in Assessing earthquake hazards and reducing risk in the Pacific Northwest,
v. 1: U.S.Geological Survey Professional Paper 1560,P.223-256.
Madin, I.P., 1990, Earthquake hazard geology maps of the Portland metropolitan area,Oregon: Oregon
Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Open-File Report 0-90-2, scale I:24,000, 22 p.
Peterson,C.D., Darioenzo, M.E., Burns, S.F.,and Burris, W.K., 1993, Field trip guide to Cascadia
paleoseismic evidence along the northern California coast: evidence of subduction zone seismicity in
the central Cascadia margin: Oregon Geology,Vol. 55,p. 99-144.
Unruh,J.R., Wong, I.G., Bott,J.D., Silva, W.J.,and Lettis, W.R., 1994, Seismotectonic evaluation:
Scoggins Dam,Tualatin Project,Northwest Oregon: unpublished report by William Lettis and
Associates and Woodward Clyde Federal Services,Oakland, CA,for U. S. Bureau of Reclamation,
Denver CO(in Geomatrix Consultants, 1995).
Werner,K.S.,Nabelek,J.,Yeats, R.S., Malone, S., 1992,The Mount Angel fault: implications of seismic-
reflection data and the Woodburn,Oregon,earthquake sequence of August, 1990: Oregon Geology,
v. 54, p. 112-117.
Wong,I. Silva, W., Bott,J., Wright, D.,Thomas, P., Gregor, N.,Li., S., Mabey, M., Sojourner,A.,and
Wang,Y.,2000,Earthquake Scenario and Probabilistic Ground Shaking Maps for the Portland,
Oregon, Metropolitan Area; State of Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries;
Interpretative Map Series IMS-16.
Yeats, R.S.,Graven, E.P.,Werner, K.S.,Goldfinger,C.,and Popowski,T., 1996,Tectonics of the
Willamette Valley,Oregon: in Assessing earthquake hazards and reducing risk in the Pacific
Northwest,Vol. I: U.S.Geological Survey Professional Paper 1560, P. 183-222, 5 plates, scale
1:100,000.
Yelin,T.S., 1992, An earthquake swarm in the north Portland Hills(Oregon): More speculations on the
seismotectonics of the Portland Basin: Geological Society of America, Programs with Abstracts, v.
24,no. 5,p. 92.
10-1934-Japanese International 9aplisl Church GR I5 GEOPACIFIC ENGINEERING,INC.
//�1 "1`1f`_ _ 13910 SW Galbreath Drive, Suite 102
CooPaciiuc Sherwood,Oregon 97140 VICINITY MAP
trtlitcetrlog.inc. Tel:(503)625-4455 Fax: (503)625-4405
1
1 I
11 re: I E.v I 0 a d N6
4 g•I •• ' °• C We+r Plirt land
f trradir}. , t
Ii 4'46 nt w oi; ... .
,, . ...: - 2.,,,,,,:.• •, f•• .tr"Ik s.4 i- „lg. _ ,
1
. • ■m •- wY1 *.
, SUBJECT SITE tt
1:r+ruttt ' i t.
: .• *• a.
t••• r .:,. :t► . -
TIC;ALIT) ��' . I. "� �:
r ' t !/
`• ,.' /r , .,.`. -, 'lf free '. 1•• •t > . ,• . . rf i •
o\ at -A.s. (tt tt,,a aj� 't wt 14
NORTH
. t a' 8 •i,. 1
. j .,, i
1, w t 1 i. R14
,1
Date 02/05/10
Legend Approximate Scale 1 in=2.000 ft Drawn by EKR
Base map U S Geological Survey 7 5 minute Topographic Map Series.Beaverton.Oregon Quadrangle. 1961 (Revised 19841
and Lake Oswego.Oregon Quadrangle 1961 (Revised 19841
Project Japanese International Baptist Church Project No 10-1934 FIGURE 1
Tigard Oregon
13910 SW Galbreath Drive,Suite 102 SITE PLAN AND
68oP
r Sherwood, Oregon 97140
rnglneennakm Tel: (503)625-4455 Fax: (503)625.4405 EXPLORATION LOCATIONS
SPRUCE STREET
•
B-1
•
TP-1
TP-2
B-2 .
eit
B-3
4
T lal
`U.Y.
FK
VA N
North i
Legend Date: 02/04/10
0 80. Drawn by: EKR
B-1 Boring Designation TP-1 Test Pit Designation and i
-S- and Approximate Location Si Approximate Location APPROXIMATE SCALE 1"=80'
Project:Japanese International Baptist Church project No. 10-1934
FIGURE 2
Tigard, Oregon
13910 SW Galbreath Drive,Suite 102
cos c Sherwood,Oregon 97140 BORING LOG
Ingmeennglnc Tel: (503)625-4455 Fax: (503)625-4405
Project: Japanese International Baptist Church Job No. 10-1934 BoringNo. B-
Tigard, Oregon
mm
T m C o N? O
o a �.., mN
8
o E > m N 5 o Material Description
S
Medium stiff to stiff, SILT(ML)with gravel, brown, micaceous, subtle orange
and gray mottling, roots throughout, moist(Undocumented Fill)
6
5
g Medium stiff to stiff, interbedded SILT(ML)and silty SAND(SM), light brown to
blue gray, subtle to strong orange and gray mottling, trace black staining,
7 moist to wet(Willamette Formation)
10 El5
15
6
20
12
Boring Terminated at 21.5 Feet
25
Note' Groundwater seepage encountered at 7.5 feet.
30
35
LEGEND
Date Drilled' 02/03/10
Logged By: B. Rapp
t
1,000,
s tale Water Table: Surface Elevation-
Beg Sample Sp a-Spoon Shelby Tine Semple at Ding Slalic Water Table Water Bearing Zone
13910 SW Galbreath Drive,Suite 102
coop Inc Sherwood,Oregon 97140 BORING LOG
Engulf etlny tnc Tel: (503)625-4455 Fax: (503)625-4405
Project: Japanese International Baptist Church Job No. 10 1934 Tigard, Oregon Boring No. B-2
m
E o a ma o
N
m n m m2 .o`� m Cr,> N 0 3. Material Description
E P
h 0
_Crushed rock�gr y moistlExts6ng DrivewaYFil,
6 Medium stiff to stiff, SILT (ML), light brown to blue gray, strong orange and gray
mottling, trace black staining, damp to moist(Willamette Formation)
5
13
Boring Terminated at 6.5 Feet.
10
Note: No groundwater or seepage encountered.
15
20
25
30
35
LEGEND
Date Drilled: 02/03/10
too to Logged By: B. Rapp
1,000g
e Sample StatcWaterlabia Surface Elevation
a9 pl Spla•Spu t, Shelby Tube Sample at Outing Stabs Water Table Water Baanrg Zone
S
Ge E 13910 oo ,Oregon
Drive,Suite 102 BORING LOG
Sherwood,Ore on 97140
tnglnannnmb. Tel: (503)625-4455 Fax: (503)625-4405
Project: Japanese International Baptist Church Job No. 10-1934 BoringNo. B-3
Tigard, Oregon
m
T c c m a 0
1- j 00 t dN
a > 3 2 O 0 3 Material Description
y U m
_Crushed rocks,gryymost/xisting-Driveway FlilL
Medium stiff SILT(ML), gray, strong orange and gray mottling, moist
(Undocumented Fill)
111 7
Medium stiff to stiff, SILT(ML), light brown to gray, strong orange and gray
5 mottling, trace black staining, trace roots, damp to moist(Willamette Formation)
15
Boring Terminated at 6-5 Feet.
10
Note. No groundwater or seepage encountered.
15
20
25
30
35
LEGEND
Date Drilled: 02/03/10
Logged ey: B. Rapp
1 a
Sauc Wafer Table Surface Elevation_
Bag Sample split-spoon Shelby Tube Semple al Dulling Sietc Water Table Water Seanng Zone
13910 SW Galbreath Drive,Suite 102
GeoPica Sherwood,Oregon 97140 TEST PIT LOG
tnpnecnnn Inc Tel: (503)625-4455 Fax: (503)625-4405
Project: Japanese International Baptist Church Project No. 10-1934 Test Pit No. TP- 1
Tigard, Oregon
r m -9, o
7c9
ECEe ` a "= m Material Description
a v� o
Highly organic SILT(OL-ML),brown,roots throughout, loose, moist(Topsoil on Fill)
1 1.0 Medium stiff to stiff, SILT (ML)with gravel, brown, micaceous, strong orange
2.0 and gray mottling, damp (Undocumented Fill)
2 3.0
3 1.5
Stiff to very stiff, SILT(ML), trace fine grained sand, light brown, subtle orange
4 3.0 A and gray mottling, trace black staining, moist to wet(Willamette Formation)
5
6
7
8
Test Pit Terminated at 8 Feet.
9
10
Note: Groundwater seepage encountered at 4.5 feet.
Discharge visually estimated at less than 1 gallon per minute.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
LEGEND
1 Date Excavated: 02/03/10
,'00 °' — ® Logged By: B. Rapp
Bag Sample Bucket Sample Shot?tube sample Seepage Water B Surface Elevation:
apa8 eating Zone Water LBv01 at Abandonment
13910 SW Galbreath Drive,Suite 102
p g Sherwood, Oregon 97140 TEST PIT LOG
Englneenag tin Tel: (503)625-4455 Fax: (503)625.4405
Project: Japanese International Baptist Church Project No. 10-1934 Test Pit No. TP-2
Tigard, Oregon
O p c a)
atl v n T 'Yy m
� E � y
n ❑a v 5 Material Description
8 'd c0 E
a in o L� m
Moderately organic SILT(OL-ML), brown, roots throughout,loose,moist(Topsoil on Fill)
1 0.5 Medium stiff to stiff, SILT(ML)with gravel, brown, trace inorganic debris,
micaceous, strong orange and gray mottling, roots throughout, moist
2 1 0 (Undocumented Fill)
3 2.5
Stiff to very stiff, SILT(ML), trace fine grained sand, light brown to blue gray,
4 2.0 subtle to strong orange and gray mottling, roots down to 4 feet, trace black
staining, moist to wet(Willamette Formation)
5
6
7
8
Test Pit Terminated at 8 Feet.
9
10 Note: Groundwater seepage encountered at 5 feet.
Discharge visually estimated at less than 1 gallon per minute.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
LEGEND
Date Excavated: 02/03/10
100to ✓,w
Logged By: B. Rapp
1.000g a- g
Surface Elevation:
Bag Sample Bucket Sample Shelby rube Semple Seepage Water Beanng Done Water Level at Abandonment
PRE -
APPLICATION
CONFERENCE
NOTES
CITY OF TIGARD
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES
(Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6)Months) TIGARD'.
PR 1[PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: IO i i I� 0/1 l t�
STAFF AT PRE-APP.: ° ei P61 iV
NON-RESIDENTIAL
APPLICANT: Keryi Yokoi AGENT:
Phone: 503-705-5213 Phone: .( ) -
PROPERTY LOCATION:
ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 8500&8512 SW Spruce Street
TAX MAP(S)/LOT#(S): 1S135AD02700&1S136CB04400
NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Lot Line Adjustment&Conditional Use Permit(Major modification)
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: construct a 7.200 sqft building for church function.Building would be
used for classrooms,bball court,bathrooms,play area, and coffee lounge.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
MAP DESIGNATION: Medium&Medium High Residential
ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: R-25&R-12
ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.)
hIINIMUM LOT SIZE: sq. ft. Average Min.lot width: 20,000 sqft. Max.building height: 45 ft.
Setbacks: Front:25 ft. Side: 20 ft. Rear:20 ft, Corner:20 ft. from street.
MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE:L0%.* Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 20%.
Lot coverage indudes all buildings&impervious surfaces.
Each setback shall be increased five foot for every 10 feet of building height over 45 feet.
® NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout)
THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FF.FT, INTERESTED
PARTIES,AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two
(2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification
handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application
or the application will not be accepted.
* NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is
encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application.
// NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390)
CITY OF TIGARD Pre Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8
NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section
The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval
standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application
incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria.
® IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050)
As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE
IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on
public facilities and services. The study shall address,at a minimum,the transportation system,including bikeways,
the drainage system,the parks system,the water system,the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development.
For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City
standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and
affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of
real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide
evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to
the projected impacts of the development.
• ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765)
Minimum number of accesses:One. Minimum access width:30 ft.
Minimum pavement width:24'curbs required.
All driveways and parking areas,except for some fleet storage parking areas,must be paved.
Drive-in use queuing areas: N/A
® WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030)
WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE
GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial,institutional, and industrial
uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections
between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical,
walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments.
❑ SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730)
STREETS: feet from the centerline of
> LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet,along the site's boundary.
➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK.
SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.020.B)
BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS-Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75
feet provided that:
► A maximum building floor area to site area ratio(FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist;
► All actual building setbacks will be at least half('h) of the building's height; and
► The structure wiff not abut a residential zoned district.
® BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745&18.620)
In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINA I r.ADVERSE NOISE OR
VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires
landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of
width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also
achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required;
these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by
vegetation, fences,utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may
be found in the Development Code.
The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are:
n/a feet along north boundary. n/a feet along east boundary.
n/a feet along south boundary. 7 feet along west boundary.
IN ADDITION,SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG:NIA.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8
NON-Residential Application,Planning Division Section
SCREENING: SPECIAL PROVISIONS-18.745.050E
Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas is required per specifications in section 17.745.050E (1). In
no cases shall nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas be permitted to become any less conforming.
In addition,screening of sernce facilities and refuse areas also applies to all development with the exception of one
and two family dwellings.
• LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745,18.765 and 18.620)
STREET TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE III), DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), MINOR LAND
PARTITION (TYPE II), PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III), SITE DEVF.T OPMENT REVIEW
(TYPE II), AND SUBDIVISION (TYPE II & III). The minimum number of required street trees shall be
determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet(if the
number is a fraction,round to the nearest whole number). The trees shall be placed within the public right-of-way
whenever possible but no more than six (6) feet from the right-of-way boundary. Street trees shall be planted
according to Section 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual and adequate soil volumes shall be provided in accordance
with Section 12 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Existing trees may be used to meet the street standards. Further
information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division.
PARKING LOT TREES ARE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE (TYPE III), DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW (TYPE II & III), PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT (TYPE III),AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (TYPE II)All parking areas,including
parking spaces and aisles, shall be required to achieve at least 30°/a tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the
parking area in accordance with Section 13 of the Urban Forestry Manual.
❑ RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755)
Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE
SERVICING COMPA FIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the
intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's
Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at(503) 625-61'77.
® PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040)
REQUIRED parking for this type of use:
Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): No additional parking is required unless the assembly area is expanded.
SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking:
Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s):.
NO MORE THAN 50%OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS
COMPACT SPACES.
PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows:
► Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet,6 inches x 18 feet,6 inches.
► Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet,6 inches x 16 feet,6 inches.
Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space.
Note: A maximum of three(3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as
part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the
minimum percentage requirements.
HANDICAPPED PARKING:
► All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED
PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as
well as the parking stall dimensions,is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). A handout is
available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface
and an appropriate sign shall be posted.
► BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in
convenient locations.
❑ LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080)
CITY OF TIGA.RD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8
NON-Residential Application Mamma Oicidnn Section
Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be
provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer.
❑ BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.765)
BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient
locations.
REQUIRED bicycle racks for this type of use:_
❑ SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775)
The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE PO l ENTIALLY UNSUITABT,F FOR
DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL
DRAINAGEWAYS,WETLAND AREAS,ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT,OR ON UNSTABLE
GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based
on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas. and their
boundaries. is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly
indicated on plans submitted with the development application.
Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS.
❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.070.C)
When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which
addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report
shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving
the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C.
® CLEAN WATER SERVICES (CWS)BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to CWS R&O 07-20/USA Regulations-Chapter 3)
LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a
vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area.
Design Criteria:
The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the
required widths:
TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS
SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION&ORDER 07-20
SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED
TO SENSITIVE AREA4 CORRIDOR PER SIDES
• Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25%
I 10 to<50 acres 15 feet
I >50 to<100 acres 25 feet
• Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet
• Existing or created wetlands>0.5 acre <25% 50 feet
• Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow
• Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres
• Natural lakes and ponds
• Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25%
I 10 to<50 acres 30 feet
I >50 to <100 acres 50 feet
• Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure in 25-
• Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow foot increments from the starting point to
• Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres the top of ravine(break in<25%slope),
• Natural lakes and ponds add 35 feet past the top of ravine6
4Srarting point for measurement=edge of the defined channel(bankful flow)for streams/rivers,delineated wetland boundary,delineated spring boundary,and/or average
high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intemtittent springs,located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8
NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section
corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement
5vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition.
(*The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped
geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine.
Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor:
NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any
materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality
protection provided by the vegetated corridor,except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards.
Location of Vegetated Corridor:
IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for
separate ownership,such as a subdivision,the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract,and shall not
be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit.
CWS Service Provider Letter
PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter
which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensitive area requirements. If
there are no sensitive areas,CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required.
® SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780)
SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard.
A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code
standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application.
Alternatively,a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review.
► Non-residential developments within the C-G zone shall meet the sign requirements for the commercial
zones, 18.780.130C.
® URBAN FORESTRY PLAN (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the"Tree Canopy Requirements"
Brochure)
AN URBAN FORESTRY PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLWING TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT:
Conditional Use(Type III);Downtown Design Review(Type II and III);Minor Land Partition (Type II);
Planned Development (Type III);Sensitive Lands Review(Type II and III);Site Development Review(Type II);
and Subdivision (Type II and III). The plan needs to be prepared by an ISA certified arborist or landscaped
architect.
Percentage of mature canopy cover required: 33% (Refer to ppendix 2-6 in Urban Forestry Manual for a list of trees
with mature canopy cover areas)
Percentage of mature canopy cover required per lot in R-1, R-2, R-3.5,R4.5&R-7: 15%
An urban forestry plan shall:
- Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person
possessing dual certifications as a certified arborist and certified tree risk assessor(the project arborist);
- Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in Section 10, part 1 of the Urban Forestry
Manual;
- Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in Section 10,part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual;and
- Meet the supplemental report standards in Section 10,part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual.
TREE CANOPY FEE. If the effective percentage of tree canopy cover cannot be met, the applicant shall
provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in Section 10, part 4 of the Urban
Forestry Manual.
18.790.040-Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review Option
In lieu of providing payment of a tree canopy fee when less than the standard effective tree canopy cover
required by Section 10, part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual will be provided, an applicant may apply for a
discretionary urban forestry plan review. The discretionary urban forestry plan review cannot be used to modify
an already approved urban forestry plan, any tree preservation or tree planting requirements established as part
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8
NON-Residential Application,Planning Division Section
of another land use review approval,or any tree preservation or tree planting requirements required by another
chapter in this title.
® PRESERVATION OF EXISTING TREES (Refer to Code Section 18.790.050.C.)
To assist in the preservation and/or planting of trees and significant tree groves, the director may apply one or
more of the following flexible standards as part of the land use review approval. Use of the flexible standards
shall be requested by the project arborist or landscape architect as part of the land use review process. The
flexible standards are only applicable to trees that are eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of
the site.
Appropriate species of trees in good condition and suitable for preservation receive a 200 percent credit based on
their existing canopy area.Refer to Section 11-Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual for submittal requirements.
® CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795)
The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE(3)AND EIGHT(8)
FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway,road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear
vision area depends upon the abutting streets functional classification and any existing obstructions within the dear
vision area.
❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060)
bIINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots
created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access
easement.
The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH,unless the parcel
is less than 1' times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district.
CODE CHAPTERS
® 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations)
❑ 18.340(Directors Interpretation) n 18.630(Washington Square Regional Canter) ® 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements)
❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.640(Durham Quarry Design Standards) ❑ 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review)
❑ 18.360(Site Development Review) 18.705(AccessiEgress/Circulation) ® 18.780(Signs)
❑ 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits)
❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) 18.790(Urban Forestry Plan)
❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ® 18.795(visual Clearance Areas)
® 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) ® 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities)
❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ❑ 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards)
❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay)
n 18.430(Subdtsions) n 18.742(Home Occupation Permits)
® 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ® 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards)
❑ 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations)
18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage)
ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS:
Conditional Use Permit:$5,591
PROCEDURE
Administrative Staff Review.
Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer,
Public hearing before the Planning Commission.
Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the
proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the Ctty Council.
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8
NON-Residenrial Applicmon.Planning Dmston Section
All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the
Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted
by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The
Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM.
Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 81/2" x 11". One.81/2" x 11" map of
a proposed project shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision.
Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted.
The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will
determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the
applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required.
The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is
accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or
requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the
Planning staff ate issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land
use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the TigardHearings Officer. A basic flow chart which
illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request.
Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less
than 10 days prior to the public hearing.
This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE
INThNDF.D TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code
requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective
applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site.
BUILDING PERMITS
PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building
Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These
pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or
modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to
determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as
proposed.
Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has
system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when
the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building
permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT
THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED).
PLEASE NOTE:
The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning
that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information
required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is
recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development
Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an
application.
AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN
APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A
PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as
unnecessary by the Planning Division).
PREPARED BY: Agnes Kowacz
CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION
PHONE: 503-718-2421 FAX: 503-598-1960 DIRECT: 503-718-2427
EMAIL agnesk@tigard-or.gov
TITLE 18(CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVET OPMENT CODE)INTERNET ADDRESS: www.tigard-or.gov
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8
NON-Residential Application'Planning Division Section
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES •
➢ DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING TIGARD
City el Tigard,Orogen
Community Development
— _ _ ShapmgJl(Better Coatrnwuty
PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Mania1: 1S136CB M.Church
Tax Lef1S1: 4400
Use Type: 7200 sf building
These notes have been prepared based on the information submitted by the applicant showing
consolidation of existing lots and construction of a 7,200sf educational space structure at 8500 and
8512 SW Spruce St.
The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant
will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be
no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned
commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the
application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that
may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project.
Right-of-way dedication:
The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public:
(1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification
right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or
(2.) For the creation of new streets.
Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for:
® A minimum 27-foot half-width along SW Spruce St. It appears that adequate right-of-way
exists.
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conlerence Notes Page 1 of 5
gsvelepmsnt Engiasedua
Street improvements: (Subject to rough proportionality)
® Partial street improvements and/or future street improvement agreements (where allowed) will
be necessary along _Spruce St to include:
® pavement half-width of at least 16 feet
® concrete curb
® 5-foot planter exclusive of curb
® storm sewers and other underground utilities
® 5-foot concrete sidewalk
® street trees
® street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee.
® Other: Pavement tapers as necessary
It appears that the trip generation of the proposed development will be less than the TMC 18.810 threshold for
requiring a traffic study.
18.705 Access and Egress
Accesses will need to be constructed in accordance with City design standards (concrete aprons, etc.)
18.730.040 Additional Setback Requirements: This section sets requirements for additional setback distance
from roadways. The minimum yard requirement shall be increased in the event a yard abuts a street
having a right-of-way width less than required by its functional classification on the city's transportation
plan map and, in such case, the setback shall be not less than the setback required by the zone plus
one-half of the projected road width as shown on the transportation map.
This appears to not be applicable
Agreement for Future Street Improvements:
In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently
practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may
be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City
Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible
for such a future improvement guarantee:
(1.) This appears to not be applicable
(2.)
Overhead Utility Lines:
Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent
to a development to be placed underground or, if approved by the City Engineer, a fee in-lieu of
undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite
side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is approved, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of
street frontage that contains the overhead lines.
CRY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 5
Development Egleeerle9
The existing overhead utilities along the frontage of the 8512 property will need to be relocated underground
as part of the required street frontage improvements. All new utilities will need to be constructed underground.
Sanitary Sewers:
The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. It appears that a sewer line
runs along Spruce St. The developer will need to verify adequacy for the proposed use and pay the
appropriate connection fees. Contact the Utility Billing staff for connection fees.
Water Supply:
The Tualatin Valley Water District provides public water service in this area. Coordinate with TVWD for
information regarding adequate water supply and appropriate connection requirements for the
proposed development.
Fire Protection:
Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District [Contact: John Wolff, 503-259-1504] provides fire protection
services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the
adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection.
Storm Sewer Improvements:
All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to
an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm
drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that
the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed.
Provide a plan that shows how the storm drainage system for the site connects to the public system.
Storm drainage plan and calculations shall be submitted with the application for it to be considered
complete.
Storm water detention is required for any increase in impervious area. Storm water detention facilities
must be reviewed and approved by the city. Storm water detention calculations shall be submitted to
the Development Engineer for review and approval.
Storm drainage must connect to a public system of adequate capacity or discharge to a suitable outfall
location meeting appropriate standards (such as CWS).
Storm Water Quality:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the
Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of
on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus
contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The resolution
contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility
provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-
lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious surfaces
created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof. Please contact the Building Division for the
current fee. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted
with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require:
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 5
Ievelopmeet Enloe ,tng
Building Division Permits:
The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more
detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at
503-639-4171, ext. 304.
Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial,
industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot
grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading
and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in
cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation
material is not to be hauled from the site.
Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is
issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit.
Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It
covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading,
etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are
substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant
to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required,
and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit.
Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and
plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more
information.
PREPARED BY: Mike McCarthy 10/14/13
DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER DATE
Phone: (503)718-2462
E-mail: mikem@tigard-or.gov
Revised' March 2012
CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5
retrotepment Englneedng
City of Tigard1111 �/St-
.
TDT—COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAX
TIGARD Rate Calculation Worksheet
APPLICANT 14u %` VO k0 z DATE / /7/L /, s
MAILING ADDRESS //a.Gs- -ski 83 r�4)et_ PREPARED BY ,4//r- / i apt
//CITY/ZIP/PHONE pz� B2 q�Z ?�.1 PLANS CHEC „ a
1�vJ 3- V 3-voo3 9
TAX MAP# / S./3TA)) 0 2,¢0
074//3/3LC� oho r/� ENLTSITLE
�N
T-fllJ(!G �l�fll,
SITUS#ADDRESS CSJ Z y-5-00 J�I'17-spCVGE.S�1�3"•-,s 6,4/(2tM- L o
FORMER USE(S) ���'�
USE ITE # TDT DESCRIPTION NOTDL# CODE UNITS X RATE = AMOUNT _ /� // ((j��-
J10 /.l x �; _ Bt /,D 78 (i�iu l`r.Lc n Ai `�k
x P/ 34 3 = 7* .'3 2_, # u ,rk./et, scli.Do( e_.54t..nteoCro
x =
TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S)
PROPOSED USES)
USE ITE # TDT
X RATE = DESCRIPTION/NOTE
# CODE UNITSyAMOUNT D�/J
/ s/>O r. 2 x ;1 S'' = �3 8: 05.z' `.H zoo :P1 ��LC+//-4, TLr.i L�r.`N C
x 71J23e .17=/3 0 D3o J
x =
x =
TOTAL TDT,PROPOSED USE(S) ---#/e9,O 3 C,
LESS TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) - �r q j� II'�3q�
TDT INCREASE/(DECREASE) /�'/ ( R 'T•,A E=T DUE)
�-
PAYMENT METHOD �/ 2-KS /
CASH/CHECK QpG'oSEyj 72d0, G.atur ` cS✓u c cos� , � / 3 o h(/e_
CREDIT 7y0C9T 13 00 = J�.�FG�
BANCROFT AGREEMENT �2/d/L /o 9t'ff 67utA D-`5s,cS r /3 Cz) 517,E
(PROMISSORY NOTE) r /p7rT / 00 = m.g t
DEFER TO OCCUPANCY '`/X lr /f.€/47 f s %,, E.-- -/ Z_
I/OFS/CD/FORMS/TDT Rate Calculation W rksheet.indd(Rev.4/22/09)
S1NEIWf1DOU
)14_6, cv.ub
8
WASTE MANAGEMENT
June 10, 2015,
Roger Brockway
ESI Const.
Re: Japanese International
Roger,
Waste Management of Oregon-Washington County has reviewed the service level of 2-
96 gallon carts once a week for trash and 1-64 gallon cart for recycle to be adequate.
Sincerely,
Darin Flaig
Route Manager
Waste Management of Oregon-Washington County Operations
•
1 " r,
,■ry F x '"illr,�
i
*R
(`
1
r r
•
a� •.r ,.` , •t .r • r • �•' 11••W4 .mow• a i 1 '` 1 I . • ' - ,
u r 1 ill, •
x }e
•
•
. .4. i• 1
I • G ,
•
•
•
•
it 1 •
•
•
•
41
•
:A., -,
Y , ry,� 4 * .. 1 M• r 1911 t -et r 1IE
.. -`jam• - ' i' ATOP_{ "
•
•
. ,,Iof y
I 5 s ,
, ! 4 �a ; .a - i�,l*.i. ! "i s, „Ai .. . �' ` !`
;, 4V,
' `':, .r , a• 1* .11 r1.e a •. 1 h '
I ' I '- 4 ` '#vat _l . ii�f•ff izf lit 1iit:i ' !
ii!J ! '
I A.. AR
! ; , +
,
,.
• " 1 t ° :1 S s'. jl� r "`fir=y%
, Y
IN
':.';?*If!,-.. "at • i ? . . ' 1-T*4 P•-,:74-, ,.- - - r •- - r' 4:4 , • r ),,
•
>�
•
1 +; / mo,,
I
� ( :'• '� ` �. y„ 1y* _ , pis . k`
iri
jlj t E.,r-41+, :r an -`f' y5 ,,;�,r, 3. -"
. '1 '.. . ria i : 14' , m e
TH
•
a ts, r 1111 ry
,� ` r
L . , : ,,, ,,.
I i ... e` ' el • . i
14111
I VI
1?1 Cir-
' e e , '�F i `' t 4 ;140, :„,.,;.,,...0, ,. .,....,,,... .
•
, I 7;• a
I t i
•
•
l}
I• ç ; e ;
." ' 4 , i. - -L,, L.' • '1' ' . •
I
A en
k 1
Ni.
i
•
{ _ , ' •. :T , '1,: .• *'41 : y •
�. 1J , 1•
, •
�'
✓ 1G, if
•
' , ry
•
1/+ L 'y, ( .ta5,i, pi• +M rir } �^ •! '4 • '•.,'i' a.'', f(( -. t 1. a 'f�
" Y4,,1 `4411:1yyirf • r ,jr. , � y: ,r_. ,. jT ' '$ �T a i =
•
ik
A
( -
•
I • • t,,. „,,
�� 4 ry i {t+ 1
,i ' f ". MT a
a .r • - I t
lit
1 t.
``
J
• Y : 11 tR' ' '1 ' ' °If"
� ♦t. .t ' r , * •a4 q•
g
2}
M ee f-s C o n ci i-k o vn s +� 3 -4- I -
•
•
CITY TR FEE AND PAYMENT HISTORY
, i .M
13125$WOF Hall Blvd.,TiIGAgard OD 97223
ill
503.639.4171
TIGAAII
CUP2014-00003 - 8500 SW SPRUCE ST,TIGARD,OR 97223
Revenue Payment
Fee Description Account Number Fee Amount Invoiced Paid Date Paid Method Receipt# - Due
Conditional Use Permit-Major 100-0000-43116 $5,580.00 $5,580.00 35,580.00 8/14/14 Check 197242 $0,00
Modification
Conditional Use Permit-Major 100-0000-43117 $824.00 $824.00 $824.00 8/14/14 Check 197242 $0.00
Modification-LRP
Inventory Fee-Open Grown Tree-1st 100-0000-43116 $128.00 $128.00 $128.00 4/15/15 Check 200313 $0.00
Inventory Fee-Open Grown Tree-1st- 100-0000-43117 $19.00 $19.00 $19.00 4/15/15 Check 200313 $0.00
LRP
Inventory Fee-Open Grown Tree-each 100-0000-43116 $616.00 $616.00 $616.00 4/15/15 Check 200313 $0.00
addl
Inventory Fee-Stand of Trees-1st 100-0000-43116 $170.00 $170.00 $170.00 4/15/15 Check 200313 $0.00
Tree Establish Bond-1.5'Tree in other 260-0000-22000 $7,056.00 $7,056.00 $7,056.00 4/15/15 Check 200314 $0.00
Land Use
Inventory Fee-Stand of Trees-1st- 100-0000-43117 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 4/15115 Check 200313 $0.00
LRP
Address Fee 100-0000-43113 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 5/7/15 Fund Transfer 200642 $0.00
Totals for Fees $14,468.00 $14,468.00 $14,468.00 $0.00
Receipt# Payment Method Check# Payor: Receipt Date Receipt Amount
197242 Check 1052 Japanese International 08/14/2014 $6,404.00
Baptist Church
200313 Check 1083 Japanese International 04/15/2015 5958.00
Baptist
200314 Check 1084 Japanese International 04/15/2015 $7,056.00
Baptist
200642 Fund Transfer 05/07/2015 $50.00
Total Payments: $14,468.00
Balance Due: $0.00
Eril
TIGARD
City of Tigard
November 4,2014
Japanese International Baptist Church
Kenji Yokoi
8500 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97224
RE: Completeness—8500 SW Spruce Street
Case File No. CUP2014-00003
Dear Mr. Yokoi:
The City has received your application for a church addition (CUP2014-00003) located at
8500 SW Spruce Street. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal materials
and has determined that your application was complete as of October 30th for the purpose of
beginning the 120-day review period for a final decision.
The formal comment and review process typically takes 4 to 6 weeks. It should be noted
that staff has not reviewed the application submittal for compliance with the relevant code
criteria, and that additional items may arise during the application review which may require
further clarification.
Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please contact me at 503-718-
2427.
Sincerely,
AIM 6/P/tAt
Agnes Kowacz
Associate Planner
cc: Tony Weller; CESNW, Inc.
CUP2014-00003 Land Use File
13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171
TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov
If
TIGARD
City of Tigard
September 12, 2014
Japanese International Baptist Church
Kenji Yokoi
8500 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97224
RE: Completeness—8500 SW Spruce Street
Case File No. CUP2014-00003
Dear Mr. Yokoi:
The City has received your application for a non-profit preschool (CUP2014-00003) located
at 8500 SW Spruce Street. Staff has completed a preliminary review of the submittal
materials and has determined that the following additional information is necessary before
the application can be deemed complete:
1. Narrative. Please revise the narrative to address/expand upon the following criteria:
• 18.330—Conditional Use.
Section 18.330.040.A—Please address the approval criteria.
• 18.705—Access, Egress and Circulation.
Section 18.705.030:4—Please address this section.
Section 17.705.030.H. —Please provide distances from adjacent existing driveways.
• 18.745—Landscaping and Screening.
Section 18.745.040 — Four street trees are required (three proposed), please
demonstrate how this requirement is met. A fee in lieu is acceptable.
Section 18.745.050.E.1 — Existing trees shall use existing canopy (not mature
canopy). Existing trees do not receive double credit in order to meet 30% canopy
requirement over the parking lot. Please provide canopy in square feet.
Section 18.745.050.E.2 and 3—Please address this section.
• 18.755 —Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage.
Please address this section.
• 18.765—Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements.
18.765.040 J — Wheel stops are required along the boundaries of the parking lot,
interior landscape islands and sidewalks. Please demonstrate this requirement is met.
18.765.050—Address entire section.
18.765.070 — Please provide the size of the assembly (number of seats) to determine
number of required parking spaces.
2. Site Plan.
• 18.765.040.J —Please show all required wheel stops.
13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171
TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov
• 18.745.050.E.1 —Provide existing, not mature canopy in square feet.
• 18.755 —Please show location of trash areas.
3. Urban Forestry Plan.
• Tree Removal and Preservation Plan.
o Provide canopy in square feet of existing canopy,not mature.
o Provide numerical preservation rating, as shown on Page 10-7 of the
Urban Forestry Manual. Trees with a rating of 2 or higher are be eligible
for double credit.
o Indicate which trees are used to meet canopy requirements and total of
the canopy square footage.
• Canopy Site Plan.
o Please provide the following signature block:
"The canopy site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10, part 2 of the Urban
Forestry Manual"
• Supplemental Report.
o Please address Section 10,Part 3; I.
o The following signature block is required on the supplemental report:
"A signature of approval and statement from the project arborist or landscape architect,
attesting that:
1. The tree preservation and removal site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10,
part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual;
2. The canopy site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10, part 2 of the Urban
Forestry Manual; and
3. The supplemental report meets all of the requirements in Section 10,part 3 of the Urban
Forestry Manual."
4. Mailing Labels.
• Please provide two sets of envelopes with postage and mailing labels of property
owners within 500 feet and interested parties.
Please provide 3 copies of each revised document. If re-submitting individual
pages/sheets you will need to replace them in the existing packets previously
submitted. Should you have any questions with regard to these items, please contact me at
503-718-2427.
Sincerely,
Ati ka
Agnes Kowacz
Associate Planner
cc: Tony Weller; CESNW, Inc.
CUP2014-00003 Land Use File
PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: Japanese Baptist spruce
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 9/10/14
GRADING
® Existing and proposed contours shown.
® Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? No
® Adjacent parcel grades shown.
® j Geotech study submitted? N/A
STREET ISSUES
® Right-of-way clearly shown.
® Centerline of street(s) clearly shown.
® Street name(s) shown.
® Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown.
® Street profiles shown. N/A
® Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo N/A
on adjacent parcel(s), etc.
® Traffic Impact and/or Access Report
® Street grades compliant?
® Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? The final PFI documents will need to show
that the proposed street lighting is adequate,
or add lights as necessary.
® Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width N/A
appropriate?
® Other: Offsite sidewalks TMC 18,810,070.62. requires sidewalk
connections to existing sidewalks within 300
ft of the site such as Hall Blvd. Please
respond to this requirement.
SANITARY SEWER ISSUES
® Existing/proposed lines shown.
® Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? N/A
WATER ISSUES
® Existing/proposed lines w/ sizes noted?
® Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? Check with TVF&R for requirements
® Proposed meter location and size shown?
® Proposed fire protection system shown?
STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES
® Existing/proposed lines shown?
® Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention
provided?
® Water quality/detention facility shown on plans?
® Area for facility match requirements from calcs?
® Facility shown outside any wetland buffer?
® Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? N/A
REVISED: 09/11/14