Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Packet - 02/23/2021
�! ' City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting —Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL& TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Revised 2/22/2021 to revise Executive Session times and mark one as a Town Center Development Agency Executive Session MEETING DATE AND TIME: February 23, 2021 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session; 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: Remote participation only. See PUBLIC NOTICE below. PUBLIC NOTICE: In accordance with the City of Tigard's Emergency Declaration related to COVID-19 and Oregon House Bill 4212, this will be a virtual meeting where Council and staff will participate remotely. There will be no in-person public testimony during this meeting.How to comment: •Written public comment may be submitted electronically at www.tigard-or.gov/Comments. All comments must be submitted before 4:30 p.m. the day of the meeting. If you prefer to call in,please call 503-966-4101 between 7:15 and 7:30 p.m. to be placed in the queue for comments on items not on the agenda. •There are two public hearings. Please refer to Agenda Items No. 3 - Legislative Public Hearing: Consider an Ordinance allowing for the Implementation of 20 MPH Speed Zones, and No. 4: Quasi Judicial Public Hearing to Consider Approval of Aman Rezoning, for information and call 503-966-4101 at the beginning of the agenda item to be placed in the caller queue. Note that the times are estimated. We ask that you plan on limiting your testimony to three minutes. SEE ATTACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVESTREAM ONLINE: htttp://www.tiaard-or.2ov/city hall/council meetin2.php CABLE VIEWERS: The first City Council meeting of the month may be shown live on Channel 28 at 6:30 p.m. The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. " City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting —Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING DATE AND TIME: February 23, 2021 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session; 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: Remote participation only. 6:30 PM •STUDY SESSION A. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss real property negotiations,under ORS 192.660(2) (e). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 6:30 p.m. estimated time B. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 7:15 p.m. estimated time 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. PUBLIC COMMENT A. Written Public Comment Received by 4:30 p.m. B. Phone-in Public Comment C. Follow-up to Previous Public Comment 3. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF 20 MPH SPEED ZONES 7:35 p.m. estimated time 4. QUASI-JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AMAN REZONING APPLICATION (CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001) 7:50 p.m. estimated time 5. CONSIDER RESOLUTION REFERRING THE CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE VOTERS 8:50 p.m. estimated time 6. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 7. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard Town Center Development Agency will go into Executive Session to discuss real property negotiations,under ORS 192.660(2) (e). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. 9:05 p.m. estimated time 9. ADJOURNMENT 9:15 p.m. estimated time TIGARD Meeting of the Tigard Council February 23, 2021 Public Testimony Received By 4:30 p.m. on 2/23/2021 2/23/2021 Jilian Saurage Felton in favor of Aman Rezoning Carol Krager From: noreply@revize.com Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 4:23 PM To: Carol Krager Cc: Caroline Patton Subject: Public Comments Attachments: CPAH letter of support Aman zone change.docx Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Block sender Name=Jilian Saurage Felton EmailAddress=jsaurage@cpahoregon.org Address= PO Box 23206 Tigard, OR 97281-3206 Topic= Wafter Aman zone change Yes, I support=Yes FeedBackText= Letter attached Client IP =71.237.175.211 1 CPA. COMMUNITY PARTNERS P.O. Box 23206 * Tigard, OR 97281-3206 * cpahinc.org FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING Tel: 503.293.4038 * Fax: 503.293.4039 * TTY/VCO: 800.735.2900 To Tigard City Council: As the Director of Housing Development for Community Partners for Affordable Housing, I know that well planned, safe and stable neighborhoods are critical for our residents to succeed. This area is important to CPAH—we see that there are many opportunities and possibilities for increasing affordable housing, and we applaud the City's efforts and successes in bringing more affordable housing to this local community. We know that there is increasing pressure in the marketplace to purchase, renovate and raise rents on current unregulated affordable multi-family housing at a time when Tigard residents are considered to be severely rent burdened (more than 25%of residents spend 50%of their income on housing).We know that increasing the availability of affordable housing decreases traffic, as people can afford to live closer to wear the work, increases the amount of money spent at local businesses and an increase in jobs, and improves health outcomes for residents, and education outcomes for all students. During the work that Tigard did with the Southwest Corridor Equitable Development Strategy, we learned,from the feed back from residents and stakeholders, that the most needed type of housing is affordable housing for families with children. We know that there are homeless students in the Tigard-Tualatin school district that would greatly benefit from an increase in affordable housing, and many Tigard families who are struggling to stay in the housing they have. The COVID-19 pandemic has only increased this community struggle. Should this zone change be approved, and CPAH acquire the property, it is our design intent to have units which accommodate families and children,to provide the appropriate services for those families, and as always to be good partners with the City of Tigard,the neighborhood, and Washington County. Timing is critical for the success of this project with funding applications due to the State of Oregon this spring. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Jilian Saurage Felton Director of Housing Development Community Partners for Affordable Housing CPAH does not discriminate against any person on the basis of age,race,color,religion,sex,sexual orientation or gender identity,disability(physical,mental or developmental),familial or marital status,or national origin,in admission or EQUAL HOUSING access to, or treatment of,residents,employees or volunteers in any of its projects or programs. OPPORTUNITY AIS-4473 3. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/23/2021 Length (in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: Legislative Public Hearing: Consider an Ordinance Allowing for the Implementation of 20 MPH Speed Zones Prepared For: Tegan Enloe, Public Works Submitted By: Tegan Enloe, Public Works Item Type: Ordinance Meeting Type: Consent Agenda Public Hearing: Yes Publication Date: Information ISSUE Provide a briefing to Council about the implementation of 20 MPH speed zones on selected roadways in Tigard to inform them as they consider an ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends Council adopt the ordinance. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY ORS 810.180 allows local agencies to adopt an ordinance that would allow them to implement 20 MPH zones on roadways that meet the following criteria: * Located in a residential district * Not an arterial roadway * Currently part of a statutory 25 MPH zone Adoption of the ordinance would not immediately implement 20 MPH zones where applicable, but would allow the City Engineer to direct staff to install 20 MPH signs and implement zones. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could choose to not pass the ordinance, which would mean the City cannot implement 20 MPH zones in Tigard. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Reduced vehicle speeds as part of a 20 MPH implementation supports: * Goal 3, Policy 6 of the adopted Transportation System Plan: The city shall develop and implement public street standards that recognize the multi-purpose nature of the street right-of-way. * Goal 3, Policy 7 of the adopted Transportation System Plan: The city shall design all projects on Tigard city streets to encourage pedestrian and bicycle travel. * Goal 4, Policy 1 of the adopted Transportation System Plan: The city shall consider the intended uses of a street during the design to promote safety, efficiency and multi-modal needs. * Goal 4, Policy 7 of the adopted Transportation System Plan: The city shall enhance and maintain a neighborhood traffic management program to address issues of excessive speeding and through traffic on local residential streets. * Complete Streets Policy, which states: The city will utilize current and emerging best practices in transportation network and facility design to best serve the multi- modal transportation needs of all users, including review of operating speeds. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Information related to this topic was presented at the December 20, 2020 Council Workshop meeting. The following questions were raised to staff during the meeting. Responses are provided below. How are 20 MPH locations selected for the "documented driver behavior concerns" cateeorv? To qualify for consideration for implementation as a driver behavior and/or geographical complexity site, the location must meet some combination of the following criteria as deemed appropriate by the City Engineer: •Fifty percent or more of drivers must be going over the posted speed limit, •The 85th percentile speed must be more than five miles above the posted speed limit, •The average daily traffic must be more than 600 vehicles per day, •Have a record of concerns expressed to the City for a period of more than one year from date of installation, • Complex geographical features, such a steep grade, sharp curves, etc. What will public education involve for the 20 MPH roll out? Prior to bringing the ordinance to Council for consideration, staff have sought community input and provided education on the potential program via: • Cityscape Newsletter •Social media •Tigard Life newspaper If the ordinance is adopted, staff propose to provide education to the public through: •Postcard to 20 MPH impacted neighborhoods in advance of installation •Website •Social media Can we add more police officers to support? •With the proposed schedule, Tigard Police can support the sites with existing motorcycle officers as they roll out per month. •Tigard Police can supplement with patrol as necessary. •Tigard Police's initial posture will be education, rather than enforcement, for everyone but the most egregious violations •Engineering will be collecting data on compliance of new zones so Tigard Police can target enforcement in the most effective manner What is the proposed schedule? •The first 6 months will be used for scoping, post cards/mailings, ordering signs, collecting "before" data, etc. •After that, the City will roll out two install zones per month until the first phase is complete Attachments Ordinance Survey Results 20 MPH PPT CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 21- AN ORDINANCE TO ALLOW THE CITY OF TIGARD TO IMPLEMENT 20 MPH SPEED ZONES IN SET CT AREAS WHEREAS, the 2019 Oregon Legislature passed SB 558, amending ORS 810.180 to authorize cities to designate by ordinance a speed that is five MPH lower than statutory speed on non-arterial streets in "residence districts" under their jurisdiction;and WHEREAS,reduced vehicle speeds supports Goal 3, Policy 6 of the adopted Transportation System Plan:The city shall develop and implement public street standards that recognize the multi-purpose nature of the street right-of-way;and WHEREAS, reduced vehicle speeds supports Goal 3, Policy 7 of the adopted Transportation System Plan: The city shall design all projects on Tigard city streets to encourage pedestrian and bicycle travel;and WHEREAS,reduced vehicle speeds supports Goal 4, Policy 1 of the adopted Transportation System Plan:The city shall consider the intended uses of a street during the design to promote safety,efficiency and multi-modal needs;and WHEREAS,reduced vehicle speeds supports Goal 4, Policy 7 of the adopted Transportation System Plan:The city shall enhance and maintain a neighborhood traffic management program to address issues of excessive speeding and through traffic on local residential streets;and WHEREAS, the City has adopted a Complete Streets Policy, which states, "The City will utilize current and emerging best practices in transportation network and facility design to best serve the multi- modal transportation needs of all users,including review of operating speeds." NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Consistent with ORS 810.180, the City of Tigard establishes a designated speed of 20 MPH, 5 MPH lower than the statutory speed of 25 MPH, on local streets in "residence districts" as defined by ORS 801.430 and 810.180(12). SECTION 2: Per ORS 810.180, the designated speed established by this Ordinance will take effect on a segment of a local street upon the City's removal of any 25 MPH signs and installation of 20 MPH signs on that street segment. The City Engineer will have the authority to approve eligible locations and direct staff to install necessary signage. SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the council, signature by the mayor,and posting by the city recorder. PASSED: By vote of all council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of 2021. ORDINANCE No.21- Page 1 Carol A. Krager,City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of ,2021. Jason B. Snider,Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No.21- Page 2 .114 " City of Tigard TIGARD Memorandum To: Tegan Enloe, Senior Project Engineer From: Marissa Grass, Community Engagement Coordinator Re: 20 Miles Per Hour Zones Survey Date: February 2, 2021 The 20 Mile Per Hour Survey Your Tigard page was available from December 30, 2020 to January 31, 2021. The results are summarized below. Visitors Your Tigard Survey: 20 Miles Per Hour Zones Aware Informed Engaged Visited at least one Page Downloaded a document, Participated in a survey visited multiple pages or asked questions 415 250 208 Feedback Summary Overall, most respondents are supportive of reducing speeds to 20 mph in select residential areas. Overall support: • Yes [56.8%] • Neutral [3.3%] • Somewhat No • Somewhat Yes [9.9%] [10.8%] • No [19.2%] Respondents are generally supportive of the proposed implementation plan. Supportive of the implementation plan: • Yes [67.1%] • No [6.6%] • Not supportive of reducing speeds to 20 mph [26.3%] Schools should be prioritized first. Specific streets, near parks and trails, and residential areas are also important. Where would be your first priority for implementation of the 20 mph program? School Zones 57 respondents Specific Streets 39 respondents i.e. Bull Mountain Road,Ascension Drive, 79th Avenue, Durham Road Near Parks & Trails 16 respondents Residential Areas 17 respondents The top two concerns with the proposal were enforcement and the cost of implementation. Enforcement was a theme throughout the survey. a) Some respondents felt that enforcement actions are needed over the proposed signage. Select comments: • "Regardless of posted speeds,we need to have the traffic enforcement resources available" • "The speed limit here is 25. I haven't seen any enforcement. Lowering the speed limit will make the city think they are fixing a problem that they are not." b) Some respondents felt that the new speed limit could not or would not be adequately enforced. Select comments: • "Enforceability is a concern." • "It will only be successful if there is adequate enforcement." c) Some respondents felt that the effort was an attempt to raise money for the Police Department. Select Comments: • "Roads are made for cars. Car fees pay for roads. I suspect this is just an excuse to have more ticket$ issued to enhance city revenue." • "This will just be ignored or strictly enforced just to get more money from tax payers. I don't see this as a solution. I see this as a new revenue stream from tax payers who have for decades paid taxes and not gotten the services because the city is too busy catering to snob hill, government unions and squeaky wheel special interest groups." For the folks who are unsupportive, most report that either there is nothing that could be changed in the proposal to gain their support or that enforcement is needed. Select comments: • "If people will not slow to 25 MPH, they are not going to slow even further. I would rather see the time and money being placed in enforcing the current speed." • "There's no enforcement now to keep speeds at 25 or 30. So,why would we reduce speed limits if nobody cares anyhow? Drivers don't care. Police don't have time to care. Why waste my tax dollars on new signage?" Most of the additional comments received centered on specific streets, enforcement, or support for the program. Topics of additional comment: *Note: These comments are in addition to the comments reported on above. Specific Streets 19 respondents Enforcement 13 respondents Support for the Program 10 respondents Cost of Implementation 8 respondents Traffic Calming 7 respondents Program not effective 4 respondents Unsupportive of the Program 5 respondents Safety 2 respondents Education campaign 2 respondents School zone safety 1 respondent Sidewalks 1 respondent Implement Faster 1 respondent -- � City of Tigard Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done 1114 20 MPH Speed Zones in Tigard TIGARD City of Tigard What is being considered ? An ordinance that would allow the City Engineer to establish 20 MPH speed zones in select residential areas in Tigard City of Tigard What we heard last time • General support for a 20 MPH program • Specific questions to be addressed City of Tigard Q: Define 'documented driver behavior concerns' category Some combination of the following as deemed appropriate by City Engineer: • Fifty percent or more of drivers must be going over the posted speed limit, • The 85th percentile speed must be more than five above the posted speed limit, • The average daily traffic must be more than 600 vehicles per day, • Have a record of concerns expressed to the City for a period of more than one year from date of installation, • Complex geographical features, such a steep grade, sharp curves, etc. City of Tigard Q: What public education is recommended Prior to bringing the ordinance to Council for consideration, staff have sought community input and provided education on the potential program via: • Cityscape Newsletter • Social Media • Tigard Life City of Tigard Q: What public education is recommended If the ordinance is adopted, staff propose to provide education to the public through: • Postcard to 20 MPH impacted neighborhoods in advance of installation • Website • Social Media City of TigardIP Q: Police Support • With the proposed schedule, Tigard Police can support with their existing motorcycle officers • Can supplement with patrol as necessary • Initial posture will be education, rather than enforcement, for everyone but the most egregious violations • Engineering will be collecting data on compliance of new zones so Tigard Police can target enforcement in the most effective manner PCity of Tigard Q: Proposed Schedule • The first 6 months will be used for scoping, post cards/mailings, ordering signs, collecting before data, etc. • After that the City will roll out two install zones per month until the first phase is complete City of Tigard Where would ordinance apply? • ORS 810.180(11) • A City can establish a speed 5 MPH below the statutory speed if it meets the following: 1 Currently a statutory 25 mph zone 1 Not an arterial / Located in a "residence district" City of Tigard Where in Tigard Qualifies . 4 Eligible Residential Roads i 111 ! "r"..::8:,.,c f .fig fiked 1,7,,tvilly Ev§rixEmon 4 2 i ^ i : 1 -..,;.,i. 1 ...4,04 . .NI, ......4111*Ph. • ,. .,ir. ,........., ,. I.-6. " ... J Hiloher gtore 10111414this le-le I g ...'.'\' , .qua.t ux - I germ hl'r ecwityr rkeed. iN-e,A.-4.1 am af, . ,.....•LI,LS d"...,ii.07. 41 1. g .... .... • . ,• 1. . •.pirie i I 7 . 2,-,-:—.1...pi.._ I r 5... •--• r . . .,-.41 , . ., , _ , . . f 0 .,,..-.N=01,"Mg d- SE e ' , ' ' ''.. ''''l III I 1 - .^tr . E . .'•.... te •••. 1'. 14,tir , I , I .61' ''"" --1 ,., I -..... - NTA ...... • id... L.,... .i.U.. . \ . . . , . . . ,) I i I( t mee )7...... . 0., et° .11.1Led-Ill ''' .":/ 1 I 3 1 i . A 1 . N ---, ..--1-• . i I-1 ' /... ,.I‘. \ -...... --. .... ___ Boon....."" I ,-• ,.: ....... *4 _. I r ii ... 1 , 1 r,--. ,i1 ;—.' • n,....,41.„:1-4 I-I-L'04.,--4, .1..1 i i .i....!......di 7'3'ff".6.. , Mill I X 1 ffmt.d I . . . ...yrb.q. L 1..1 i # 10 . !. di 4., • r 1 LI--.• 1 w-elli ...A_ . 1 2 : -.6 .. ... c : 'I IL""", IP C : . ; e MI -r 1 / ..,.., il F e 1 I 14 1-r-;,., I...._ ; ..... .. ,..._:— I. .num poctuNt "c'riliAl I ,p..4 m `i i ..".4 1 2'...." ''',•:. j 1.7•••i ...,:', • ; . 1........'. - i v , -$-- r P Ai .1 t,.... dr . , 1 A-7.7r 1 ;.••• ' .47 • ill mr-v \ 1 , , ,.... ...... .. , . ., . -- --4 '-'4, 1-' 1 k ',...• .• .•..-- - it'>/ 1-,'c / li %'. Ic-Al . • - - -E Ilk •,—. \ eiD- follhoo ne in?.•I •Pnl .. 0-`-, \' ... :.. '''-Or %.'' i j''''. i' ..... pa,MUM) .r.. Yr 1. 4 ...... .... ... .., ...... . .., ....._ __ ........-A z im .., 1 __..... .,, ,, City of Tigard Recommended Implementation Plan • Staff recommends Council adopt an ordinance that allows implementation of the 20 MPH program on all eligible streets in Tigard • Full roll out will require significant staff time and capital funds, and would take several years • Staff recommend targeted implementation in key locations as part of a first phase while scoping is completed for further priorities City wide City of Tigard Recommended Implementation Plan • Where to start first: / Data driven approach & response to community feedback / Existing 20 MPH School zones 1 Safe Routes to School walk/roll routes 1 Trail connections 1 Areas with documented behavioral issues or complex features City of Tigard Recommended Implementation Plan - _ :I _ _ _,,r1 ,,,, 1 Tigard 20 MPH Pilot Program ' 1- 1 _ - . Proposed Initial Streets , _ - - In - - - p - r 1 ) ,== -,...r..=.,-= ,L-1 I r 7, -.. .5 ... ... . - H.--_ i ..... ' ''' I I ',-11 I 7 7' 19 /I = , \ 1 I ' i g ,., ... 1 - - I I 1.----- I \ 1 . . ' . .,. _ --'- - - ..., . . ,r ..... r I / 1'.'“ '-7- '. - I 1 \.. ----L I- r •e _ . . . , '-- ' ...„ , 1 ', , - - I -,_ _...... 1 - -, 2-li .... ,-, ;s _ ) ,- ,, .p,...... I,..;. ,_-- .,..-....7. .,,, 0 „ , 1 . 1- Li _Er.,,_......„t ,, ,1_, ,, ,,. J ,• . . '; - I 1 , ...... . .. ...... .. , . , ,,-..:,•:::,„,, -11 :i , L. - ,..i • ... ;I , g ' / 1 I City of Tigard Community Engagement • City-wide community engagement website & survey 1 Survey received 208 responses 1 Majority (67%) support 20 MPH • First phase locations: 1 Post cards / "20 is Plenty" signs 1 Advanced project signs City of TigardEP Next Steps • Continue outreach and education • Begin implementation • Before/After studies .1 City of Tigard For Consideration • Staff recommend approval of the drafted ordinance • If approved, staff can begin implementation of 20 MPH zones where eligible City of Tigard QUESTIONS? AIS-4514 4. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/23/2021 Length (in minutes): 60 Minutes Agenda Title: Quasi Judicial Public Hearing: Consider Approval of Aman Rezoning Application (CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001) Prepared For: Agnes Lindor, Community Development Submitted By: Carol Krager, Central Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Council Ordinance Business Public Hearing - Quasi Judicial Meeting - Main Public Hearing: Yes Publication Date: Information ISSUE Provide information about a comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment (CPA2020-00001 /ZON2020-00001) for property located at 11655 SW Pacific Highway from Commercial General (C-G) and Medium Density Residential (R-12) to Commercial General (C-G) and Medium-High Density Residential (R-25). STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST The Planning Commission recommended approval, by a 5-1 vote (with two abstentions), of the proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendments. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The project site is approximately 5.36-acres with frontage on SW Pacific Highway to the south and SW Torchwood Street to the north. The site consists of three lots, recently approved through a partition (MLP2020-00009). There are two existing buildings on Lot 3 that are being used for a recreational vehicle rental business. Most of the site is paved, except the northernmost part (Lot 1) that is undeveloped and mostly grass. Lot 3 is zoned General Commercial (C-G) with a General Commercial comprehensive plan designation and Lots 1 and 2 are zoned R-12 with a Medium Density Residential comprehensive plan designation. Properties to the north and west are developed with apartments and condominiums (R-25 and R-12 zones); properties to the east are developed with single detached houses and commercial uses (R-12 and C-G zones); the property to the south is also developed with commercial uses (C-G zone). The applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from General Commercial and Medium Density Residential to General Commercial and Medium-High Density Residential, and a Zoning Map Amendment from C-G and R-12 to C-G and R-25. The proposal results in a net increase of four dwelling units. Amendments to the zoning map require that a Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) analysis be submitted ensuring that the zone change will not create a significant impact on the transportation system. The TPR analysis states that the proposed zone change is expected to increase the potential trip generation by 139 trips in the AM peak hour and 111 trips in the PM peak hour (a total of 1,670 daily trips). Of these trips, Lot 2 would be expected to see an increase of 128 trips in the AM peak house and 98 trips in the PM peak hour (a total of 1,501 trips). The trips on Lot 2 will access directly onto SW Pacific Highway. The applicant is proposing a trip cap on Lot 2 to mitigate the significant increase in trips. With the proposed trip cap for Lot 2 as a condition of approval, the proposal does not create a significant increase in trips and complies with the requirements of the TPR. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The City Council may: 1. Approve the amendments as recommened by Planning Commission; 2. Approve the amendments with modifications; 3. Deny the amendments; or 4. Remand the amendments back to Planning Commission. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, and 10. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION None. Attachments Ordinance Exhibit A Proposed Amendments Exhibit B Findings Memo to Council Staff Presentation Applicant Presentation CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 21- AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA 2020-00001 AND ZONE CHANGE ZON2020-00001 TO AMEND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING MAP FROM C-G AND R-12 TO C-G AND R-25 ON TAX LOT 1 S 136CA01600. WHEREAS, Section 18.710.080 of the City of Tigard Community Development Code requires quasi-judicial amendments to be undertaken by means of a Type III-Modified procedure when a zone change application also involves a concurrent application for a comprehensive plan map amendment, as governed by Section 18.790.030; and WHEREAS, the applicant now requests an amendment to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map to rezone the subject property, from C-G and R-12 to C-G and R-25; and WHEREAS, on August 31, 2020, September 14, 2020 and January 25, 2021, the Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing, which was noticed in accordance with city requirements, and recommended approval of the proposed CPA2020-00001 and ZON2020-00001 by motion with a 5-1 vote in favor and two abstained; and WHEREAS, on February 23, 2021, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing, which was noticed in accordance with city requirements, to consider the Commission's recommendation on CPA2020-00001 and ZON2020-00001, to receive public testimony, and apply applicable decision-making criteria; and WHEREAS, Council's decision to approve CPA 2020-00001 and ZON 2020-00001 and adopt this ordinance was based on the findings and conclusions found in Exhibit "B" and the associated land use record which is incorporated herein by reference and is contained in land use file CPA2020-00001 and ZON2020-00001. NOW, THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Tigard City Council amends the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning map as shown in Exhibit "A" SECTION 2: Tigard City Council adopts the findings and conclusions contained in Exhibit "B" in support of the Council's action and to be the basis for this ordinance. SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the council, signature by the mayor, and posting by the city recorder. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only,this day of . 2021. ORDINANCE No. 21- Page 1 Carol Krager, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of . 2021. Jason Snyder,Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney ORDINANCE No. 21- Page 2 &.---/ MEDIUM-NIGH MEDIUM-HIGH EXHIBIT A DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1 r &--'D D T ENS/TY RES/ E / IAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENT-A& LOW DENSITY MED/UM DENSITY MEDIUM-HIGH 1.01,0 RESIDENTIAL- DENSITY RES/DENTIAL .° IP . 1 Parcel 7t/moi Parcell • 7.46 acres Torchwood s# r 7.46 acres / Torchwood St — .L' i • \ Parcel 2 ( Parcel 2 MEDIUM Dr_-NSlTY MEDIUM DEJSITY7 33 acres MEDIUM DENSITY ,WEN lf1 MIUM DENSITY 7 33 acresRESIDEENTIALRESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DNS/TY RESIDENTIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL Parcel 3Parcel 3 2.57 acres 2.57 acres GENERAL COMMERCIAL 4114111. II.,iril GENERAL COMMERCIAL 1 7-\7"- -GENERAL COMMERCIAL GENERAt, COMMERCIAL 2 7.Z.-,-- ,,,,--,7,,,,:z-EXISTING DMP PLAN .I - ION PROPOSED COMP PLAND� S- ATION I 1 4‘.___J EXTG R-25 ,__ i _ ,___, EXTG• R-25 EXHIBIT A EXTG• R-4•5 . EXTG• R-4.5 EXTG• R-72 PROPOSED R-25 —_ I I il I 6 i Parcell Parcell /--r �° 7.46 acres 7orchwood St 7.46 acres _j 7orchwo d St 4 I / T _____--- ,/ - . ri— I f / Parcel 2 7.33 acres EXTG R-72 C Parcel 2 7.33 acres EXTG• R-72 EXTG• R-72 1,1r EXTG R-72 EXTG R-72 k PROPOSED C-G I . 1 Parcel 3 Parcel 3 2.57 acres 2.57 acres !— EXTG• C-G I EXTG• C-G II IF 1 • ._,.. L ,-Iv1 i EXTG• C-G EXT. CI: k. • Z"..., EXISTING ZONING7Y ,...-- PROPOSED ZONING - EXHIBIT B Agenda Item: 5 Hearing Date: February 23.2021 Time: 7:30 PM PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL : q FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD 120 DAYS = N/A SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: AMAN CASE NO.: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT CPA2020-00001 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT ZON2020-00001 PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a comprehensive plan map amendment and a zoning map amendment. According to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map, the 5.36-acre property has a split designation with both General Commercial / C-G (2.57 acres) and Medium Density Residential / R-12 (2.79 acres). The applicant is proposing a change in one of the designations from the current Medium Density Residential / R-12 to Medium-High Density Residential / R-25 as well as a change to the total amount of land in each designation. The proposal would result in the property being designated as General Commercial / C-G (3.9 acres) and Medium-High Density Residential / R-25 (1.46 acres). APPLICANT: Walter Aman PO Box 4127 Portland, OR 97208 APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Alex Dupey,MIG Inc. 1101 Second Ave #100 Seattle,WA 98101 OWNER: Same as applicant LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway;WCTM 1S136CA Tax Lot 01600. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING: General Commercial and Medium Density Residential PROPOSED: General Commercial and Medium-High Density Residential ZONE: EXISTING: C-G and R-12 PROPOSED: C-G and R-25 APPLICABLE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 1 OF 17 EXHIBIT B REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.790; Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10; and Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1. SECTION II. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends to the Tigard City Council APPROVAL of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments as complying with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations, Statewide Planning Goals, and Metro policies, and that the applicant has demonstrated adequate public services exist to serve the property at the intensity of the proposed zoning. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL , 1. Lot 2, proposed to be zoned C-G, is limited to a maximum of 56 AM peak hour and 47 PM peak hour trips with a total of 553 daily trips. If the applicant or future property owners wish to allow for more trips on Lot 2, a Major Modification (Chapter 18.765) application with accompanying Transportation Planning Rule OAR 660-012-0060 analysis will be required to determine whether the limit can be revised or removed. The trip cap will be implemented as a condition of approval on subsequent land use permits for proposed development and will be listed as a condition of approval in the ordinance adopting the zone change. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Description The project site is approximately 5.36-acres with frontage on SW Pacific Highway to the south and SW Torchwood Street to the north. The site consists of three lots, recently approved through a partition (MLP2020-00009). There are two existing buildings on Lot 3 that are being used for a recreational vehicle rental business. Most of the site is paved, except the northernmost part (Lot 1) that is undeveloped and mostly grass. Lot 3 is zoned General Commercial (C-G) with a General Commercial comprehensive plan designation; and Lots 1 and 2 are zoned R-12 with a Medium Density Residential comprehensive plan designation. Properties to the north and west are developed with apartments and condominiums (R-25 and R-12 zones); properties to the east are development with single detached houses and commercial uses (R-12 and C-G zones); and the property to the south is also developed with commercial uses (C-G zone). The subject site consists of two lots that are rectilinear in shape and a large flag lot, Lot 3, where the pole portion (approximately 70 feet wide) provides access to the site from SW Pacific Highway. The site is relatively flat, elevations range from 230 feet above mean sea level elevation near the southern property line to 245 feet near the north eastern property line. No portion of the site has slopes greater than 10 percent. Proposal Description The applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from General Commercial and Medium Density Residential to General Commercial and Medium-High Density Residential, and a Zoning Map Amendment from C-G and R-12 to C-G and R-25. The proposal is shown below. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 2 OF 17 EXHIBIT B Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment: r-„/HEDIU/Y�1-lIGl-! 'IT/Awn-w/o/4 DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ("—'DENSITY RESIDENTIAL • WW DENSITY RESIDENTAL LOCI DENSITY MEDIUM DENSITY MEDIUM-1410W1 ESIDENTAL RESIDENTIAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Parcel 1 Parcel 1 1-q6 acres 1-q6 acres Torchwnod St Parcel 2 Parcel 2 1-33 acres IYIEDIUIYI ENSI 1.33 acres MEDIUIYI DENSITY IYIEDIUIYI DENSITY i RE IDENTIRL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL /NEDIU/N DENSITY RESIDENTIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL RES?DENTIAL Parcel 3 Parcel 3 2.57 acres 2.57 acres • GENERAL CCIIYIIYIERCIRL GENERAL CCIIYIIYIERCIRL - GENERAL CCIIYIIYIERCIRL GENERAL CCIIYIIYIERCIRL Lei tel EXISTING COMP PLAN DESIGNATION PROPOSED COMP PLAN DESIGNATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 3 OF 17 EXHIBIT B Proposed Zoning Map Amendment: ,. EJCTG• R-25 or.—.1 (u___,.6X-TG- R-25 . _ ——- — EXTG• R-4.5 EXTG• R-4.5 EXTG• R-12 PROPOSED R-25 . • Parcel 1 Parcel 1 1.1/6 acres -,',.1A 1.1/6 acres ft, . Parcel 2 2 1'33 acres EXTG R 72 1.33 acres EX-r6• R-72 EX-1-6 R-12 , g.-VI-G• R-12 • EXTG• R-72 i Le.) 1. PROPOSED C-G 11 Parcel 3 Parcel 3 2.57 acres 2.57 acres -- EXTG• C-o EX-1-G• C-G ' 4.01116 • e (1,1 EXTG• C-G _ EXT C EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING Existing Acres Proposed Acres Compressive Plan Designation General Commercial 2.57 (Lot 3) 3.9 (Lot 2 and 3) Medium Density Residential 2.79 (Lot 1 and 2) 0 Medium-High Density Residential 0 1.46 (Lot 1) Zone C-G 2.57 (Lot 3) 3.9 (Lot 2 and 3) R-12 2.79 (Lot 1 and 2) 0 R-25 0 1.46 (Lot 1) TOTAL: 5.36 5.36 The R-25 zone has a minimum lot size of 1,480 square feet per unit versus 3,050 square feet in the R-12 zone. However, because the overall amount or residentially zoned land is shrinking, the net increase in density is only four units. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 4 OF 17 EXHIBIT B Decision Process The application is processed through a Type III-Modified procedure. The Planning Commission will make a recommendation to City Council on the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments. The Council may approve the amendment, approve with conditions, deny the amendments, or remand the amendments back to Planning Commission. Initially, the Planning Commission public hearing for this application was scheduled for August 31, 2020 and was continued to September 14, 2020 to resolve issues relating to the Transportation Planning Rule analysis. The September 14th hearing was cancelled due to the wildfire emergency. Since then, the applicant has been working with the City and ODOT to resolve issues relating to the TPR analysis and moving forward with a separate partition application,which has subsequently been approved. On January 25, 2021 the Planning Commission held the public hearing and recommended to City Council approval of the proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendments. SECTION IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal and be given an opportunity to provide comments prior to a decision being made. The Type III Notice of Public Hearing regarding the initial application was mailed to affected parties on August 3, 2020 and posted on the site on August 3, 2020. Due to the cancellation of the September 14th hearing, another notice of public hearing was mailed on January 5, 2021 and posted on the site on January 5, 2021. Staff received the following comments: August 10, 2020: - A phone call from Sue Rorman asking for more information about the project. August 12, 2020: - An email from Deborah Milat inquiring about what the proposed application is for. August 20, 2020: - An email from Jean Dahlquist requesting the staff report and corresponding attachments. August 24, 2020: - A phone call and email from Erica Stevensen expressing concerns relating to traffic, parking, fire, compatibility with the neighborhood, and reduced value of homes. - A phone call from Jean Stillwell inquiring about what the proposed application is for. August 25, 2020: - A phone call from a citizen (who only left their first name; Gloria) inquiring about the application. Staff called Gloria back and did not receive a response. August 31, 2020: - An email from Susan Frohnmayer requesting a link to the public hearing. Staff emailed the link. - An email from Jenn Walsh expressing concern relating to increased traffic to the neighborhood and requiring the parcels have direct access to 99W. - An email from Ashley Pace that included general questions about extension of comment period deadlines, how to attend the next meeting, whether the City Council meeting date will change, and where the City obtains it's addresses for mailings. - A phone call to testify at the hearing was received from Catherine Davidson. Staff informed Ms. Davidson that the hearing was continued and that she can testify at the hearing on September 14th September 1, 2020: - An email from Angela Swensen expressing concerns related to traffic,parking, and trespassing. - An email from Miriam Nelson expressing concern related to traffic, extension of Torchwood, parking, and trespassing. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 5 OF 17 EXHIBIT B September 3, 2020: - An email from John and Cindy Patelzick expressing concern about traffic, extension of Torchwood, impacts to animal habitats,increased noise, and lack of park amenities in the area. September 10, 2020: - An email from Jean Dahlquist stating that comprehensive plan map and zoning map amendments must address Goal 10. September 12, 2020: - An email from Mr. and Mrs. Reinertsen expressing concerns related to noise, lighting, loss of privacy,property values,increased traffic, and decreased safety. September 13, 2020: - An email from Bruce Abbott expressing concern related to traffic, lack of parking, emergency vehicle access, and negative impacts to the neighborhood. - An email from Rachel McCown expressing concerns related to insufficient finding in the traffic report,parking, traffic, building height, and noise. - An email from Mr. and Mrs. Reinertsen expressing concerns related noise, lighting, loss of privacy with removal of vegetation,property values,increased traffic, and decreased safety. - An email from John Stevenson expressing concerns related to the proposed commercial zone being extended north and traffic impacts. - An email from Jean Stillwell expressing concerns livability including increase in noise, pollution, traffic, safety and parking issues, possible fire concerns, increased crime rates, loss of privacy, and decreased property values. September 14, 2020: - A letter from Louise Dix; Fair Housing Council of Oregon, stating that the staff report must address Statewide Planning Goal 10 and demonstrate that the amendments do not leave the City with less than adequate residential land supplies. - An email from Jim Long asking whether the September 14th hearing is cancelled and when the next hearing will be held. - An email from Leela Seeber expressing concerns related to traffic,lack of sidewalks and parking, and timing of these amendments with housing that is under construction at SW Spruce and SW 72°d Avenue. - An email from Jeff Smith expressing concerns related to access, traffic, parking, emergency access, incompatibility issues with existing neighborhood, increased exposure to Covid, loss of privacy, property values, and commercially-zoned property being proposed adjacent to residential. November 13, 2020: - An email from Jennifer Flor asking the status of these amendments. January 7 and 8, 2021: - An email from Mr. and Mrs. Patelzick expressing opposition to the zone changes and concerns regarding property values and traffic. January 12, 2021: - A phone call from Angela Swensen regarding the upcoming hearing. Ms. Swensen expressed concerns regarding Torchwood Street and safety. January 20,2021: - A phone call from Catherine Davidson regarding the upcoming hearing. Ms. Davidson expressed concerns regarding Torchwood Street,parking, and safety. January 24, 2021: - An email from Erica Stevenson expressing concern regarding access from Lot 2 to Torchwood Street. - An email from Jeff Seeber inquiring about how to provide public testimony. - An email from John Stevenson expressing concern over access from Lot 2 to Torchwood Street. - An email from Leela Seeber expressing concerns regarding traffic, safety, and lack of sidewalks. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 6 OF 17 EXHIBIT B No other comments were received at the time this report was written. At the January 25, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing, the Commission received public testimony from four citizens: - Angela Swensen, 11074 SW Legacy Oak Way, expressed concern about the safety of Torchwood Street with added development. Ms. Swensen states that the adjacent development to the east (White Oak Village) is served by a narrow private street and the driveways are not long enough to accommodate a vehicle so residents park on Torchwood. - Catherine Davidson, 7577 SW Torchwood Street, expressed the same concerns regarding parking and safety of Torchwood, as mentioned by Ms. Swensen. Ms. Davidson also asked whether the extension of Torchwood to 78th Avenue is required at this time and what the street improvements would be for Torchwood Street. - Jim Long (Chair of CPO 4M), 10655 SW Hall Boulevard, expressed having difficulty accessing the meeting and asked the Planning Commission to continue the hearing to a later date in order to have time to prepare comments based on the proposal presented. Mr. Long also agreed with the safety and parking issues on Torchwood Street from previous comments. - Jeff Seeber,10885 SW 74th Ave, asked about whether the TPR analysis includes developments on Oak Street and in the Tigard Triangle. Mr. Seeber also acknowledged parking issues along Torchwood and concerns with construction traffic at time of development No other public testimony was received at the hearing. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The following chapters containing the applicable criteria are listed in the order they are addressed in the report. 18.790 Text and Map Amendments This section contains all of the applicable city, state, and metro policies,provisions, and criteria that apply to the proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment. City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan: Chapter 1: Citizen Involvement Chapter 2: Land Use Planning Chapter 10: Housing SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS 18.790.030 Quasi Judicial Amendments A.Approval process. 3. A quasi-judicial zoning map amendment application that requires a comprehensive map plan amendment is processed through a Type III-Modified procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.080, which is decided by the City Council with a recommendation by Planning Commission. The applicant is requesting a comprehensive plan map amendment from General Commercial and Medium- Density Residential to General Commercial and Medium-High-Density Residential. The applicant is also requesting a zoning map amendment from C-G and R-12 to C-G and R-25. Therefore, a Type III-Modified PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 7 OF 17 EXHIBIT B procedure is applicable. B. Approval criteria.A recommendation or decision for a quasi-judicial zoning map amendment or quasi-judicial comprehensive plan amendment will be based on the following: 1. Demonstration of compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations; and City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan Chapter 1: Citizen Involvement Goal 1.1 Provide citizens, affected agencies, and other jurisdictions the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. Policy 2 The City shall define and publicize an appropriate role for citizens in each phase of the land use planning process. Policy 5 The opportunities for citizen involvement provided by the City shall be appropriate to the scale of the planning effort and shall involve a broad cross- section of the community. Citizens, affected agencies, and other jurisdictions were given the opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning process. Several opportunities for participation are built into the Comprehensive Plan amendment process, including public hearing notification requirements pursuant to Chapter 18.710 of the Tigard Community Development Code. The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on June 25, 2020. On August 3, 2020, public hearing notice of the Planning Commission and City Council public hearings was sent to the interested parties list and all property owners within 500 feet of the subject parcels. On August 3, 2020, the proposal was posted on the City's web site. On August 4, 2020, the site was posted with a notice board. On August 24, 2020 the staff report was made available. The initial Planning Commission public hearing for this application was scheduled for August 31, 2020 and was continued to September 14, 2020 to resolve issues relating to the Transportation Planning Rule analysis. The September 14th hearing was cancelled due to the wildfire emergency. On January 5, 2021, a public hearing notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was sent to the interested parties list and all property owners within 500 feet of the subject parcels. On January 5, 2021, the site was posted with a notice board and January 7, 2021 the notice was posted on the city website. On January 14, 2021 the staff report was made available. These policies are met. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above,the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 1.1 Policies 2 and 5 are met. Chapter 2: Land Use Planning Goal 2.1 Maintain an up-to-date Comprehensive Plan, implementing regulations and action plans as the legislative basis of Tigard's land use planning program. Policy 1 The City's land use program shall establish a clear policy direction, comply with state and regional requirements, and serve its citizens' own interests. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 8 OF 17 EXHIBIT B The goals and policies contained in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan provide the basis for the city's land use planning program. This policy is met. Policy 2 The City's land use regulations, related plans, and implementing actions shall be consistent with and implement its Comprehensive Plan. The City's development code, Title 18, has been found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. This policy is met. Policy 3 The City shall coordinate the adoption, amendment, and implementation of its land use program with other potentially affected jurisdictions and agencies. Potentially affected jurisdictions and agencies were given an opportunity to comment. Any comments that were received are addressed in Section VIII: Agency Comments, below.This policy is met. Policy 5 The City shall promote intense urban level development in Metro designated Centers and Corridors, and employment and industrial areas." The Metro 2040 Growth Concept Map shows that Pacific Hwy, through Tigard, is designated as a "Corridor." The proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment for the subject site from medium-density residential, R-12, to medium high-density residential, R-25, would promote more intense urban level development than the existing zone. The R-25 zone allows more dense development with a minimum lot size of 1,480 square feet per unit versus 3,050 square feet and, in addition, allows a limited amount of neighborhood commercial uses.This policy is met. Policy 6 The City shall promote the development and maintenance of a range of land use types which are of sufficient economic value to fund needed services and advance the community's social and fiscal stability. Policy 7 The City's regulatory land use maps and development code shall implement the Comprehensive Plan by providing for needed urban land uses including: A. Residential; B. Commercial and office employment including business parks; C. Mixed use; D. Industrial; E. Overlay districts where natural resource protections or special planning and regulatory tools are warranted; and F. Public services The proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment for the subject site from medium-density residential, R-12, to medium high-density residential, R-25, would promote more intense urban level development than the existing zone. The amendments would result in increased residential density and a variety of land uses that are compatible with environmental conditions and surrounding land uses. The site does not contain any sensitive lands, would not benefit from natural resource protections nor warrant special planning and regulatory tools. These policies are met. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 9 OF 17 EXHIBIT B Policy 15 In addition to other Comprehensive Plan goals and policies deemed applicable, amendments to Tigard's Comprehensive Plan/Zone Map shall be subject to the following specific criteria: A. Transportation and other public facilities and services shall be available, or committed to be made available, and of sufficient capacity to serve the land uses allowed by the proposed map designation; The site is already served by all necessary public facilities and services, which can accommodate the proposed amendments, as detailed in 18.790.030.B.2, below. The site's proximity to Highway 99W and Torchwood Street, along with available transit service with three major bus lines (12, 64, & 94) and three bus stops within 1,000 feet make this an appropriate location for increased density. The applicant also submitted a Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) analysis. Engineering staff reviewed the analysis and agrees with the applicant's findings. The TPR analysis states that the proposed zone change is expected to increase the potential trip generation by 139 trips in the AM peak hour and 111 trips in the PM peak hour (a total of 1,670 daily trips). Of these trips, Lot 2 would be expected to see an increase of 128 trips in the AM peak house and 98 trips in the PM peak hour (a total of 1,501 trips). The trips on Lot 2 will access directly onto SW Pacific Highway. The applicant is proposing a trip cap on Lot 2 to mitigate the significant increase in trips. With the following condition of approval, this policy is met: The Lot 2, proposed to be zoned C-G, is limited to a maximum of 56 AM peak hour and 47 PM peak hour trips with a total of 553 daily trips. If the applicant or future property owners wish to allow for more trips on Lot 2, a Major Modification (Chapter 18.765) application with accompanying Transportation Planning Rule OAR 660-012-0060 analysis will be required to determine whether the limit can be revised or removed. The trip cap will be implemented as a condition of approval on subsequent land use permits for proposed development and will be listed as a condition of approval in the ordinance adopting the zone change. B. Development of land uses allowed by the new designation shall not negatively affect existing or planned transportation or other public facilities and services; The application includes a traffic analysis showing the existing transportation facilities are adequate. Impact on transportation and other public facilities and services has been addressed by a licensed engineer as shown below in 18.795.030.B.2. At this time, development is not proposed. Because the applicant is proposing a smaller overall amount of residentially zoned land the difference between the maximum density of the proposed zoning and existing zoning is only an increase of four units. This is a negligible potential increase in impacts for transportation and other public facilities. This policy is met. C. The new land use designation shall fulfill a proven community need such as provision of needed commercial goods and services, employment, housing, public and community services, etc. in the particular location, versus other appropriately designated and developable properties; According to the findings in the of the Comprehensive Plan's Land Use Planning chapter: • "One of the biggest growth management challenges that Tigard will face, as well as the rest of the Portland region,is the need to accommodate up to a million new residents..." PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 10 OF 17 EXHIBIT B • "Another growth management challenge that Tigard faces is the lack of large vacant parcels available for urban development. This type of development is a thing of the past and most household and employment growth in Tigard will be the result of redevelopment and infill." • "Future commercial, employment, and multi-family growth will likely occur through redevelopment." In addition, the Housing Strategies Report (adopted by City Council),which analyzed the city's current and future housing needs,included the following conclusion: "In general,there is a need for some less expensive ownership units and rental units. The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments from Medium-Density Residential, R-12, to Medium-High Density Residential,R-25, will allow additional needed housing located between existing commercial and multi-family uses,with close proximity to Highway 99W and transit service including three major bus routes and three bus stops within 1,000 feet. Increased density at this site contributes to accommodating needed housing and is an appropriate transition from Commercial uses to Medium Density Residential uses. The needed housing, capacity of the existing infrastructure and proximity to transit make this request timely and appropriate. This policy is met. D. Demonstration that there is an inadequate amount of developable, appropriately designated, land for the land uses that would be allowed by the new designation; The findings in the Comprehensive Plan clearly state there is a lack of large undeveloped parcels to accommodate additional residents and that there is a general need for rental units at the lower and middle price levels. The proposed development is an infill project surrounded by commercial and medium density residential development with adequate services for the use. Additionally, proximity to Highway 99W and public transportation supports increased density at this location. This policy is met. E. Demonstration that land uses allowed in the proposed designation could be developed in compliance with all applicable regulations and the purposes of any overlay district would be fulfilled; The proposal does not include an application for development. When development is proposed, the development will comply with all applicable regulations. The site is not located within any overlay district. This policy is met. F. Land uses permitted by the proposed designation would be compatible, or capable of being made compatible, with environmental conditions and surrounding land uses; and The proposed designation and zone would allow for a variety of land uses that are compatible with environmental conditions and surrounding land uses. The site already had an existing commercial use (RV rental business) on the south portion of the site (Lot 2 and 3). There is existing condominium development to the north,which is also zoned R-25, apartments to the west, and single detached houses and commercial development to the east. This policy is met. G. Demonstration that the amendment does not detract from the viability of the City's natural systems. The subject property has commercial development on the southern portion of the lot. The site has slopes less than 10 percent and does not contain any city-regulated sensitive natural resources. The proposed amendments would not detract from the viability of the City's natural systems. This policy is met. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 11 OF 17 EXHIBIT B Policy 23. The City shall require new development, including public infrastructure, to minimize conflicts by addressing the need for compatibility between it and adjacent existing and future land uses. Lots 1 and 2 are currently vacant, however, there are existing apartment and condominium buildings adjacent to the north and west, commercial uses to the south and east, and single detached houses to the east. The commercial uses face away from the existing apartment building, and therefore have no functional interaction with the uses on the subject site. The residential uses adjacent to the north, east, and west are already compatible with the future housing type, apartments. This policy is met. Chapter 10: Housing Goal 10.1 Provide opportunities for a variety of housing types at a range of price levels to meet the diverse housing needs of current and future City residents. Policy 5. The City shall provide for high and medium density housing in the areas such as town centers (Downtown), regional centers (Washington Square), and along transit corridors where employment opportunities, commercial services, transit, and other public services necessary to support higher population densities are either present or planned for in the future. The site is along a transit corridor where employment opportunities, commercial services, transit, and other public services are available to support higher population densities. Highway 99W is a transit corridor and the site is within 1,000 feet of three bus stops. There are existing apartment buildings adjacent to the north and west, commercial uses to the south and east, and single detached houses to the east. The requested comprehensive plan and zone map amendments would result in a logical transition from commercial uses to medium density multi-family residential uses. These factors combined make this location appropriate for higher populations densities, although the actual net increase in density of the proposal is four units. This policy is met. GOAL: 10.2 Maintain a high level of residential livability Policy 5. The City shall encourage housing that supports sustainable development patterns by promoting the efficient use of land, conservation of natural resources, easy access to public transit and other efficient modes of transportation, easy access to services and parks, resource efficient design and construction, and the use of renewable energy resources. The proposed amendments would allow more dense residential development on the subject site. The R-25 zone has a minimum lot size of 1,480 square feet per unit versus 3,050 square feet in the R-12 zone. However, because the overall amount or residentially zoned land is shrinking the net increase in density is only four units. The subject site is located within 1,000 feet of three bus stops on Pacific Highway. The proposal supports a sustainable infill development pattern that promotes the efficient use of land and easy access to public transit.This policy is met. Policy 7. The City shall ensure that residential densities are appropriately related to locational characteristics and site conditions such as the presence of natural hazards and natural resources, availability of public facilities and services, and existing land use patterns. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 12 OF 17 EXHIBIT B The site does not contain natural resources/hazards. The southern portion (Lots 2 and 3) of the site is currently occupied by an RV rental business, while the north portion is vacant. New development on the site is not proposed at this time. With the development application, the applicant will need to show that all public facilities are available to serve additional development on the site. The proposed amendments allow for additional density in an area with appropriate locational characteristics and site conditions where services already exist. Public transit is available nearby and existing public facilities and services support the existing and proposed land use pattern that provides for a transition between existing commercial uses and existing medium density residential uses. The proposed residential density is appropriately related to the specific locational characteristics and site conditions including availability of public facilities and services, and existing land use patterns. This policy is met. Policy 8. The City shall require measures to mitigate the adverse impacts from differing, or more intense, land uses on residential living environments, such as: A. orderly transitions from one residential density to another; B. protection of existing vegetation, natural resources and provision of open space areas; and C. installation of landscaping and effective buffering and screening. The proposed amendment to increased density on the site serves to transition from existing commercial uses and existing medium density multi-family uses. The proposal will not have any adverse impacts on adjacent development.This policy is met. METRO Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Title 1: Housing Capacity The Regional Framework Plan calls for a compact urban form and a "fair-share" approach to meeting regional housing needs. It is the purpose of Title 1 to accomplish these policies by requiring each city and county to maintain or increase its housing capacity. The City's Housing Strategies Report indicates "in general, there is a need for some less expensive ownership units and rental units." This type of housing is possible in both the R-12 and R-25 zones, which allows attached and multi-family housing on 3,050 and 1,480 square-foot lots, respectively. With this quasi- judicial action, the zone change to R-25 on the subject site will result in a marginal increase of R-25 zoned land in the City of Tigard resulting in an increasingly compact urban form and a contributing towards its "fair-share" of regional housing needs. The proposal increases Tigard's housing capacity, consistent with the purpose of Title 1. Statewide Planning Goals Statewide Planning Goan.—Citizen Involvement: This goal outlines the citizen involvement requirement for the land use planning process, including the adoption of Comprehensive Plans and changes to the Comprehensive Plan and implementing documents. This goal has been met by complying with the Tigard Development Code notice requirements set forth in Section 18.710.080 (Type-III Modified Procedure). On August 3, 2020, public hearing notice of the Planning Commission and City Council public hearings was sent to the interested parties list and all property owners within 500 feet of the subject parcels. On August 3, 2020, the proposal was posted on the City's web site. On August 4, 2020, the site was posted with a notice board. On August 24, 2020 the staff report was made available. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 13 OF 17 EXHIBIT B The Planning Commission public hearing for this application was scheduled for August 31, 2020 and was continued to September 14, 2020 to resolve issues relating to the Transportation Planning Rule analysis. The September 14``'hearing was cancelled due to the wildfire emergency. Since then, the applicant has been working with the City and ODOT to resolve issues relating to the TPR analysis and moving forward with a partition (MLP2020-00009) application,which has been approved. On January 5, 2021, a public hearing notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was sent to the interested parties list and all property owners within 500 feet of the subject parcels. On January 5, 2021, the site was posted with a notice board and January 7, 2021 the notice was posted on the city website. On January 14, 2021 the staff report was made available. This goal is satisfied. Statewide Planning Goal 2—Land Use Planning: This goal outlines the land use planning process and policy framework. The Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) has acknowledged the City's Comprehensive Plan as being consistent with the statewide planning goals. The Development Code implements the Comprehensive Plan. The Development Code establishes a process and standards to review changes to the Tigard Development Code in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and other applicable state requirements. As discussed within this report, the applicable Development Code process and standards have been applied to the proposed amendment. This goal is satisfied. Statewide Planning Goal 10—Housing: This goal requires cities and counties to provide adequate capacity for needed housing. OAR Chapter 660 Division 8, which implements Goal 10, states that "the purpose of the division is to ensure opportunity for the provision of adequate numbers of needed housing units, the efficient use of buildable land within urban growth boundaries, and to provide greater certainty in the development process so as to reduce housing costs." The city conducted an analysis of housing needs and capacity in 2012 as part of an update to Chapter 10 of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. This analysis found the capacity to build 6,714 units on 600 acres throughout the city. The analysis also found that 6,545 new units were needed by 2032. Once the types of needed housing were compared with the inventory of buildable lands, the capacity dropped to 6,457, a shortfall of 88 units. Subsequent to the city's housing needs analysis, other studies conducted by regional public agencies have detailed the dire shortage of both market-rate and affordable housing stock.A 2018 analysis by the Metro regional government found that in Washington County alone, there are more than 1,300 households on the waiting list for a Housing Authority unit,with an average wait time of 2.8 years. Of those households who are eligible to take a Section 18 voucher into the private market, approximately 30%return them unused because they cannot find an affordable unit within the time limit. A 2020 report issued by Oregon Housing and Community Services as part of its implementation of House Bill 2003 estimated that the Portland Metro region alone would need to produce over 294,000 units of housing over the next 20 years to accommodate growth and unmet need. The same report estimated that the City of Tigard alone will need more than 12,000 additional units of housing over the same period. The proposed zone change will increase housing capacity and supply in an area of the city that already includes increased density, supportive commercial development, and transit. This increase will help the city to address its ongoing housing shortfall and meet the statewide planning goal to provide an adequate supply of needed housing. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 14 OF 17 EXHIBIT B 2. Demonstration that adequate public services exist to serve the property at the intensity of proposed zoning. Factors to consider include the projected service demands of the property, the ability of the existing and proposed public services to accommodate the future use, and the characteristics of the property and development proposal,if any. The proposed amendments would allow more dense residential development on the subject site. The R-25 zone has a minimum lot size of 1,480 square feet per unit versus 3,050 square feet in the R-12 zone. However, because the overall amount or residentially zoned land is shrinking the net increase in density is only four units. Development is not proposed at this time, however, there are adequate public services to accommodate the development of an additional four units. The applicant provided the following findings with respect to the adequacy of public services to serve the increased density: Transportation System The site currently has access from Pacific Highway and Torchwood Street. The commercial development on Lots 2 and 3 will continue to take access from Pacific Highway. The future development Lot 1 will be served by the extension of Torchwood Street. The Washington County Transportation Development Tax (TDT) for this project is based on a use of Apartment. The City's Transportation System Development Charges will also be assessed at time of building permit. The development will be required to provide additional dedication on Pacific Highway, as well as improvements across the site for the extension of Torchwood Street. Storm Drainage System All storm water will be provided at time of development and in compliance with City and Clean Water Service standards for treatment and detention. Any system wide impacts will be offset by the payment of storm water SDC fees. Sanitary Sewer System The existing development on the south portion of the lot is already connected to the City's sanitary sewer system. There are existing facilities near the site that are available and have sufficient capacity to serve the development on the north portion. Any system wide impacts will be offset by the payment of sanitary sewer SDC fees. Water System Water service is provided by Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD). There are existing water mains in Pacific Highway and Torchwood Street. At time of development, the applicant will work with TVWD on obtaining water service. Parks Any system wide impacts will be offset by the payment of Park SDC fees. FINDING: As shown in the findings above, applicant demonstrates that adequate public services exist to serve the property at the intensity of the proposed R-25 zoning. RECOMMENDATION: PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 15 OF 17 EXHIBIT B Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the Tigard City Council APPROVAL of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments as complying with all applicable comprehensive plan policies and map designations, statewide planning goals, and Metro policies, and that the applicant has demonstrated adequate public services exist to serve the property at the intensity of the proposed zoning. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering Department was sent a copy of the applicant's proposal and stated they had no objections to this proposal. The City of Tigard Police Department was sent a copy of the applicant's proposal and stated they had no objections to this proposal. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS The following agencies/jurisdictions had an opportunity to review this proposal and did not respond: Metro Land Use and Planning,Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation, Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development, Oregon Department of Transportation Rail Division, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Oregon Department of Geo. And Mineral Ind., CenturyLink, Comcast, Frontier Communications, NW Natural, Portland General Electric, and TriMet. Clean Water Services issued a pre-screening site assessment (20-001667) stating that the project will not significantly impact the existing or potential sensitive areas found near the site. No other comments were provided. Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 1 reviewed the proposal and on August 10, 2020 provided the following comments: - A traffic impact study (TIS) be submitted that shows a comparison between the land use with the highest trip generation rate allowed outright under the existing and proposed zoning/comprehensive plan. - The submitted Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) analysis needs to be revised to reflect a higher trip generating use for the general commercial zone. On August 19, 2020, ODOT submitted additional comments regarding requirements for the TIS and TPR analysis and request for review and comment prior to the hearing. No additional comments were provided. Staff did meet with ODOT about the revised TPR analysis and agreed with the proposed trip cap. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue reviewed the proposal and provided a copy of the pre-application notes from March 31,2020 stating these would apply at time of development. Tualatin Valley Water District was sent a copy of the applicant's proposal and stated they had no objections to this proposal. Attachments: Attachment 1: Proposed Amendments Attachment 2:Agency Comments PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 16 OF 17 EXHIBIT B Attachment 3: Public Comments SECTION IX. CONCLUSION As demonstrated by the findings above, the Planning Commission finds, by a 5-1 vote in favor with two abstentions, that the proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendments comply with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals, applicable regional, state, and federal regulations, the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. The Planning Commission recommends approval to the Tigard City Council of the proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendments. RECOMMENDED: THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 BY THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION. Yi-Kang Hu,Planning Commission President Dated this 27th day of January 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 AMAN PAGE 17 OF 17 &c---/ MEDIUM-NIGH MEDIUM-N/614HIBIT B DENSITY RESIDENTIAL- 1 r &----'DENSITY RES/ EIAL- /TD Attachment 1-OW DENSITY RESIDENT-AL- MEDIUM ESIDENT-AL LOW DENSITY MED/UM DENSITY MEDIUM-1416141.01,0 RESIDENTIAL- DENSITY RESIDENTIAl- .° IP . 1 Parcel 7t/moi Parcell • 7.46 acres Torchwood St r 7.46 acres / Torchwood St — .L' i • Parcel 2 i_ T Parcel 2 D T \ 7 33 acres MEDIUM Dr-NSl Y MEDIUM E,J$/ Y MEDIUM DENSITY RE$IDEN'lfi1 MEDIUM DENSITY 7 33 acres RESIDENTIAL. RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY L. RESIDENTIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL Parcel 3Parcel 3 2.57 acres 2.57 acres GENERAL COMMERCIAL 4114111. illiri GENERAL COMMERCIAL 1 7-\7"- -GENERAL COMMERCIAL GENERAt, COMMERCIAL 2 7.Z.-,-- ,,,,--,74-y-EXISTING DMP PLAN .I - ION PROPOSED COMP PLAND� S- ATION r _, EX-7-6. R-25 EXT�. 5 ._______/ EX-7-6. R-25 i AttachmentHIBIT B G R-�F EXTG• R-4.5 EXTG• R-72 PROPOSED R-25 Parcel 7 II Parcel 71 'di ' 16 7• 6 acres T � orchwood St 7.46 acres I �L -_ Torchwo d St / T r H / / // jir . . ________ Parcel 2r 7.33 acres EXTG• R-72 Parcel 2 7.33 acres EXTG• R-72 EXTG R-72 XTG R-72 PROP05ED C-G Parcel 3 Parcel 3 • 2.57 acres 2.57 acres T__ EXTG• C-6 c' � — EXTG• C-G II ('1 Lil (31 r EXTG C-G —1 EXT. . C-G • I k. • z"lizJ . 1,--'V/ ,- I "Z/, EXISTING ZONING ,...-- PROPOSED ZONING - Attachment2HIBIT B City of Tigard TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: Tuly 27.2020 TO: Affected agency FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Agnes Lindor.Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2429 Email:AgnesLntigard-or.gov CPA2020-00001 / Z0N2020-00001 - AMAN - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a comprehensive plan map amendment from General Commercial and Medium- Density Residential to Medium-High-Density Residential. The applicant is also requesting a zoning map amendment from General Commercial and R-12 to R-25. LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway;Washington County Tax Map 1S136CA Tax lot 01600. ZONE: Existing: C-G and R-12 / Proposed: R-25. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: General Commercial and Medium- Density Residential / Proposed: Medium-High-Density Residential.APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.710,Land Use Review Procedures;and 18.790,Text and Map Amendments;Comprehensive Plan Goals 1,2, 10;Statewide Planning Goals 1,2, 10;and Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Titles 1. Attached are the Application Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MONDAY. AUGUST 10. 2020. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date.please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. I PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name &Number of Person(s) Commenting: I Attachment2HIBIT B 1,11 : . . City ofTigard REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TIGARD DATE: Tu]y 27.2020 TO: Affected agency FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Agnes Lindor.Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2429 Email:AgnesL a tirard-or.gov CPA2020-00001 /Z0N2020-00001 - AMAN - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a comprehensive plan map amendment from General Commercial and Medium- Density Residential to Medium-High-Density Residential. The applicant is also requesting a zoning map amendment from General Commercial and R-12 to R-25. LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway;Washington County Tax Map 1 S136CA Tax lot 01600. ZONE: Existing: C-G and R-12 / Proposed: R-25. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: General Commercial and Medium- Density Residential / Proposed: Medium-High-Density Residential.APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.710,Land Use Review Procedures;and 18.790,Text and Map Amendments;Comprehensive Plan Goals 1,2, 10;Statewide Planning Goals 1,2, 10;and Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Titles 1. Attached are the Application Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR LOMMVIEiv IS BACK BY: MONDAY, AUGUST 10.2020. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date,please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division,13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: X We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Joe Wisniewski,Assistant City Engineer-City of Tigard, 971-271-4772 IName&Number of Person(s)Commenting: I EXHIBIT B °F ° Department of Transp�d�8Wnt 2 '�`'" Region 1 Headquarters .Y' _:.° IIr€ gori 123 NW Flanders Street Portland,Oregon 97209 Kate Brown,Governor (503) 731.8200 FAX(503)731.8259 August 10th, 2020 ODOT Case No: 10624 To: Agnes Lindor, Associate Planner From: Marah Danielson, Senior Planner Subject: CPA2020-00001 and ZON2020-00001: Aman Property Comprehensive Plan Amendment& Zone Change 11655 SW Pacific Hwy, Tigard, OR We have reviewed the applicant's proposal to change the comprehensive plan and zoning designations for 4.41 acres (Lot 1) and 1.66 acres (Lot 2) of the property located at 11655 SW Pacific Hwy in Tigard. The applicant proposes to change the split zoning from R-12 and C-G to wholly C-G on Lot 1 and from R12 to R25 on Lot 2. The comprehensive plan map would change from partially Medium Density Residential and General Commercial to wholly General Commercial on Lot 1 and from Medium Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential on Lot 2. The comments provided below are consistent with the comments ODOT submitted for the pre-application conference. ODOT has permitting authority for this facility' and an interest in assuring that the proposed zone change/comprehensive plan amendment is consistent with the identified function, capacity and performance standard of this facility. According to the 1999 Oregon Highway Plan(OHP), this facility is classified a Statewide highway and the performance standard is .99 volume to capacity(v/c)ratio. For zone changes and comprehensive plan amendments, local governments must make a finding that the proposed amendment complies with the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), OAR 660-012-0060. There must be substantial evidence in the record to either make a finding of"no significant effect" on the transportation system, or if there is a significant effect, require assurance that the land uses to be allowed are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standard of the transportation facility. In order to determine whether or not there will be a significant effect on the State transportation system, ODOT requested that the City of Tigard require the applicant to submit a traffic impact study (TIS)prepared by a transportation engineer registered in Oregon. The requested analysis was for a comparison between the land use with the highest trip generation rate allowed outright under the nronosed zoning/comp plan designation and the land use with the highest trip generation rate allowed outright under 1 OAR 734-051 website:http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/rules/OARS_700/OAR 734/734_051.html Attachment2HIBIT B the existing zoning/comprehensive plan designation(this is commonly referred to as the "reasonable worst case"traffic analysis). In our pre-application comments,we noted that it is important that the applicant's transportation engineer to provide ODOT the opportunity to review and concur with the mix of land uses and square footage they propose to use for the "reasonable worst case" traffic analysis for both existing and proposed zoning prior to commencing the traffic analysis,particularly if the applicant chooses to perform their analysis using a trip generation rate determined by any means other than ITE Trip Generation. On July 9th, ODOT received the attached email from DKS and Associates with a draft TPR assessment memo dated 7/2/20. The memo included a trip generation comparison which assumed a shopping center as the reasonable worst case trip generation for the commercial lot. Based on this assumption, the memo concludes that"No transportation facilities are expected to be significantly affected and the level of traffic is consistent with the current functional classification of impacted transportation facilities. Therefore, the finding of no significant effect addresses OAR 660-012-0060 (TPR) requirements and no additional analysis of the transportation system is expected for the proposed rezone." On July 20th, 2020, ODOT provided the following response to the DKS draft TPR assessment memo: Commercial: The proposal is to rezone 1.57 acres of property from residential (R- 12)to general commercial (C-G). You have assumed a shopping center as the reasonable worst case scenario for the general commercial zoning. Given the size of the parcel, ODOT thinks that a higher trip generating use allowed in the general commercial zone would be more reasonable. We recommend the analysis be updated to reflect a higher trip generating use. You may want to contact the City of Tigard about the land use to assume for the general commercial zone and informed them of ODOT's response. Subsequently, ODOT corresponded with Tegan Enloe, Tigard Senior Project Engineer and agreed that shopping center was not the reasonable worst case trip generating use for the general commercial zone. ODOT recommend the city require the applicant to revise the TPR assessment memo using a 24 hour AM/PM store which would generate more trips considering the size of the lot proposed to change to general commercial use. We anticipated that the applicant would provide an updated TPR assessment memo utilizing a higher trip generating use assumption for the general commercial use. ODOT has not received an updated TPR assessment memo and therefore we are unable to make a determination regarding whether the highway will be significantly affected by the proposed CPA/ZC for this property. We recommend that the applicant be required to provide the city and ODOT with an updated TPR assessment memo using a more reasonable trip generating use for the general commercial zone prior to making a decision on this land use proposal. Attachment2HIBIT B If you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact me at 503.731.8258. EXHIBIT B Attachment Agnes Lindor From: Jackie Humphreys <HumphreysJ@CleanWaterServices.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 9:30 AM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: RE: Request for Comments: CPA2020-00001 Aman Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Agnes, No comments on this request. Thanks, Jackie Sue Humphreys I Engineering Plan Review Clean Water Services I Planning and Development Services 2550 SW Hillsboro Hwy I Hillsboro OR 97123 0 503.681.5101 I f 503.681.4439 engage permits I news I facebook I twitter From:Agnes Lindor<agnesl@tigard-or.gov> Sent:Wednesday,August 12, 2020 7:04 AM To:Jackie Humphreys<HumphreysJ@CleanWaterServices.org> Subject: FW: Request for Comments: CPA2020-00001 Aman Hi Jackie- Does CWS have any comments this comprehensive plan amendment/rezone?Thanks, Agnes From:Agnes Lindor Sent: Monday,July 27, 2020 2:11 PM To: Mark VanDomelen <markv(a)tigard-or.gov>;Joe Wisniewski<ioewPtieard-or.gov>; Stefanie Kouremetis <Stefanie.kouremetisPtigard-or.gov>;Wolff,John F. <iohn.wolffPtvfr.com>;John Goodrich<iohngt tigard-or.gov>; landusenotificationst oregonmetro.gov; ODOT_R1_DevRev<ODOT R1 DevRevPodot.state.or.us>; Naomi Vogel <Naomi Vogelt co.washington.or.us>; Samantha.ridderbuschPcenturvlink.com; 'Jackie Humphreys' <HumphrevsJ@CleanWaterServices.org>; BeavertonEneineerine@ftr.com; Smith,Julia <Julia.Smith@ftr.com>; brian.kellev@nwnatural.com; steve.hurshPpen.com: rvan.smith@tvwd.org; Sarah Alton <sarah.altont tvwd.org>; Development Review@trimet.org Subject: Request for Comments: CPA2020-00001 Aman CPA2020-00001 / Z0N2020-00001 - AMAN - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a comprehensive plan map amendment from General Commercial and Medium- Density Residential to Medium-High-Density Residential. The applicant is also requesting a zoning map amendment from General Commercial and R-12 to R-25. LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway;Washington County Tax Map 1S136CA Tax lot 01600. ZONE: Existing: C-G and R-12 / Proposed: R-25. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: General Commercial and Medium- 1 Attachment 2HIBIT B Density Residential/ Proposed:Medium-High-Density Residential.APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.710,Land Use Review Procedures;and 18.790,Text and Map Amendments;Comprehensive Plan Goals 1,2, 10;Statewide Planning Goals 1,2, 10;and Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Titles 1. Attached are the Application Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MONDAY,AUGUST 10,2020. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date.please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. This application requires two public hearings. The Planning Commission will make a recommendation to City Council. The hearings are schedule for: Date and Time of Hearings: Planning Commission: 7 PM on AUGUST 31, 2020 City Council: 7:30 PM on SEPTEMBER 22, 2020 Attend the Virtual Hearings: www.tigard-or.gov/citv hall/public hearints.php Thanks, Agnes Lindor I Associate Planner City of Tigard I Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 503.718.2429 Email:AenesL@tieard-or.gov DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 2 EXHIBIT B Attachment Agnes Lindor From: Wolff, John F. <John.Wolff@tvfr.com> Sent: Tuesday,August 11, 2020 3:02 PM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: RE: Request for Comments: CPA2020-00001 Aman Attachments: City of Tigard Aman Property Pre2020-00016 11655 SW Pacific Hwy.pdf Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Agnes, As this request is for a comprehensive plan map zone amendment it doesn't change TVF&R conditions from the previous letter from the pre-app dated March 31 of 2020. I am attaching that letter for the record for this comment request. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. John From:Agnes Lindor<agnesl@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday,July 27, 2020 2:11 PM To: Mark VanDomelen <markv@tigard-or.gov>;Joe Wisniewski <joew@tigard-or.gov>; Stefanie Kouremetis <stefanie.kouremetis@tigard-or.gov>;Wolff,John F. <John.Wolff@tvfr.com>;John Goodrich <johng@tigard-or.gov>; landusenotifications@oregonmetro.gov; ODOT_R1_DevRev<ODOT_R1_DevRev@odot.state.or.us>; Naomi Vogel <Naomi_Vogel@co.washington.or.us>; Samantha.ridderbusch@centurylink.com; 'Jackie Humphreys' <HumphreysJ@CleanWaterServices.org>; BeavertonEngineering@ftr.com; Smith,Julia <Julia.Smith@ftr.com>; brian.kelley@nwnatural.com; steve.hursh@pgn.com; ryan.smith@tvwd.org; Sarah Alton <sarah.alton@tvwd.org>; Development_Review@trimet.org Subject: Request for Comments: CPA2020-00001 Aman ***The sender is from outside TVF&R-Do not click on links or attachments unless you are sure they are safe*** CPA2020-00001 / Z0N2020-00001 - AMAN - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a comprehensive plan map amendment from General Commercial and Medium- Density Residential to Medium-High-Density Residential. The applicant is also requesting a zoning map amendment from General Commercial and R-12 to R-25. LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway;Washington County Tax Map 1S136CA Tax lot 01600. ZONE: Existing: C-G and R-12 / Proposed: R-25. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: General Commercial and Medium- Density Residential / Proposed:Medium-High-Density Residential.APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.710,Land Use Review Procedures;and 18.790,Text and Map Amendments;Comprehensive Plan Goals 1,2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1,2, 10; and Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Titles 1. Attached are the Application Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MONDAY.AUGUST 10.2020. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date.please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. 1 EXHIBIT B Attachment This application requires two public hearings. The Planning Commission will make a recommendation to City Council. The hearings are schedule for: Date and Time of Hearings: Planning Commission: 7 PM on AUGUST 31, 2020 City Council: 7:30 PM on SEPTEMBER 22, 2020 Attend the Virtual Hearings: www.tigard-or.gov/city hall/public hearings.php Thanks, Agnes Lindor I Associate Planner City of Tigard I Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 503.718.2429 Email:AgnesLPtigard-or.gov DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 2 EXHIBIT B Attachment www.tvfr.com Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue March 31, 2020 Associate Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Aman Property PRE2020-00016 Tax Lot I.D: ISI36CA01600 11655 SW Pacific Hwy Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed site plan surrounding the above named development project. These notes are provided in regards to the pre-application meeting held on March 31, 2020. There may be more or less requirements needed based upon the final project design, however, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue will endorse this proposal predicated on the following criteria and conditions of approval. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS: 1. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES: Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet. (OFC 503.1.1) 2. DEAD END ROADS AND TURNAROUNDS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround. Diagrams can be found in the corresponding guide that is located at http://www.tvfr.com/DocumentCenter/View/1296. (OFC 503.2.5 & D103.1) 3. ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS — COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL HEIGHT: Buildings exceeding 30 feet in height or three stories in height shall have at least two separate means of fire apparatus access. (D104.1) 4. ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS—MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS: Projects having more than 100 dwelling units shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. Exception: Projects having up to 200 dwelling units may have a single approved fire apparatus access road when all buildings, including nonresidential occupancies, are equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2. Projects having more than 200 dwelling units shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus roads regardless of whether they are equipped with an approved automatic sprinkler system. (OFC D106) 5. AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ROADS: Buildings with a vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface that exceeds 30 feet in height shall be provided with a fire apparatus access road constructed for use by aerial apparatus with an unobstructed driving surface width of not less than 26 feet. For the purposes of this section, the highest roof surface shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of the roof to the exterior wall, or the top of the parapet walls, whichever is greater. Any portion of the building may be used for this measurement, provided that it is accessible to firefighters and is capable of supporting ground ladder placement. (OFC D105.1, D105.2) Command&Business Operations Center South Operating Center Training Center and North Operating Center 8445 SW Elligsen Road 12400 SW Tonquin Road 11945 SW 70th Avenue Wilsonville,Oregon Sherwood,Oregon Tigard,Oregon 97223-9196 97070-9641 97140-9734 503-649-8577 503-259-1500 503-259-1600 EXHIBIT B Attachment 6. AERIAL APPARATUS OPERATIONS: At least one of the required aerial access routes shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building.The side of the building on which the aerial access road is positioned shall be approved by the Fire Marshal. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the aerial access road or between the aerial access road and the building. (D105.3, D105.4) 7. MULTIPLE ACCESS ROADS SEPARATION: Where two access roads are required,they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the area to be served (as identified by the Fire Marshal), measured in a straight line between accesses. (OFC D104.3) 8. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed driving surface width of not less than 20 feet (26 feet adjacent to fire hydrants (OFC D103.1)) and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. (OFC 503.2.1 & D103.1) The fire district does not endorse the design concept wherein twenty feet of unobstructed roadway width is not provided. 9. NO PARKING SIGNS: Where fire apparatus roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked vehicles and 20 feet of unobstructed driving surface, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. Signs shall read"NO PARKING-FIRE LANE"and shall be installed with a clear space above grade level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have red letters on a white reflective background. (OFC D103.6) 10. NO PARKING: Parking on emergency access roads shall be as follows (OFC D103.6.1-2): 1. 20-26 feet road width —no parking on either side of roadway 2. 26-32 feet road width —parking is allowed on one side 3. Greater than 32 feet road width— parking is not restricted Note: For specific widths and parking allowances, contact the local municipality. 11. PAINTED CURBS: Where required, fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted red (or as approved) and marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE"at 25 foot intervals. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. Lettering shall be white on red background (or as approved). (OFC 503.3) 12. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS WITH FIRE HYDRANTS: Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet and shall extend 20 feet before and after the point of the hydrant. (OFC D103.1) 13. TURNOUTS: Where access roads are less than 20 feet and exceed 400 feet in length, turnouts 10 feet wide and 30 feet long may be required and will be determined on a case by case basis. (OFC 503.2.2) 14. SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 75,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). Documentation from a registered engineer that the final construction is in accordance with approved plans or the requirements of the Fire Code may be requested. (OFC 503.2.3) 15. TURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall not be less than 28 feet and 48 feet respectively, measured from the same center point. (OFC 503.2.4 & D103.3) 16. ACCESS ROAD GRADE: Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed 15%. Alternate methods and materials may be available at the discretion of the Fire Marshal (for grade exceeding 15%). Commercial/Multi-Family 3.5—Page 2 EXHIBIT B Attachment 17. AERIAL APPARATUS OPERATING GRADES: Portions of aerial apparatus roads that will be used for aerial operations shall be as flat as possible. Front to rear and side to side maximum slope shall not exceed 10%. 18. GATES: Gates securing fire apparatus roads shall comply with all of the following (OFC D103.5, and 503.6): 1. Minimum unobstructed width shall be not less than 20 feet (or the required roadway surface width). 2. Gates shall be set back at minimum of 30 feet from the intersecting roadway or as approved. 3. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means for operation by fire department personnel 4. Electric automatic gates shall comply with ASTM F 2200 and UL 325. 19. ACCESS DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access roadways shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. Temporary address signage shall also be provided during construction. (OFC 3309 and 3310.1) 20. TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES: Shall be prohibited on fire access routes unless approved by the Fire Marshal. (OFC 503.4.1). Traffic calming measures linked here: http://www.tvfr.com/DocumentCenterNiew/1578 FIREFIGHTING WATER SUPPLIES: 21. COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS — REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The minimum fire flow and flow duration shall be determined in accordance with OFC Table B105.2. The required fire flow for a building shall not exceed the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi residual. (OFC B105.3) Note: OFC B106, Limiting Fire-Flow is also enforced, except for the following: • The maximum needed fire flow shall be 3,000 GPM, measured at 20 psi residual pressure. • Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue does not adopt Occupancy Hazards Modifiers in section B105.4-6105.4.1 22. FIRE FLOW WATER AVAILABILITY: Applicants shall provide documentation of a fire hydrant flow test or flow test modeling of water availability from the local water purveyor if the project includes a new structure or increase in the floor area of an existing structure. Tests shall be conducted from a fire hydrant within 400 feet for commercial projects, or 600 feet for residential development. Flow tests will be accepted if they were performed within 5 years as long as no adverse modifications have been made to the supply system. Water availability information may not be required to be submitted for every project. (OFC Appendix B) 23. WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved firefighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any combustible construction or storage of combustible materials on the site. (OFC 3312.1) FIRE HYDRANTS: 24. FIRE HYDRANTS—COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: Where a portion of the building is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured in an approved route around the exterior of the building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. (OFC 507.5.1) • This distance may be increased to 600 feet for buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system. • The number and distribution of fire hydrants required for commercial structure(s) is based on Table C105.1, following any fire-flow reductions allowed by section B105.3.1. Additional fire hydrants may be required due to spacing and/or section 507.5 of the Oregon Fire Code. 25. FIRE HYDRANT(S) PLACEMENT: (OFC C104) Commercial/Multi-Family 3.5—Page 3 EXHIBIT B Attachment • Existing hydrants in the area may be used to meet the required number of hydrants as approved. Hydrants that are up to 600 feet away from the nearest point of a subject building that is protected with fire sprinklers may contribute to the required number of hydrants. (OFC 507.5.1) • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by railroad tracks shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants unless approved by the Fire Marshal. • Hydrants that are separated from the subject building by divided highways or freeways shall not contribute to the required number of hydrants. Heavily traveled collector streets may be considered when approved by the Fire Marshal. • Hydrants that are accessible only by a bridge shall be acceptable to contribute to the required number of hydrants only if approved by the Fire Marshal. 26. PRIVATE FIRE HYDRANT IDENTIFICATION: Private fire hydrants shall be painted red in color. Exception: Private fire hydrants within the City of Tualatin shall be yellow in color. (OFC 507) 27. FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD: Fire hydrants shall be located not more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway unless approved by the Fire Marshal. (OFC C102.1) 28. REFLECTIVE HYDRANT MARKERS: Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of blue reflective markers. They shall be located adjacent and to the side of the center line of the access roadway that the fire hydrant is located on. In the case that there is no center line, then assume a center line and place the reflectors accordingly. (OFC 507) 29. PHYSICAL PROTECTION: Where fire hydrants are subject to impact by a motor vehicle, guard posts, bollards or other approved means of protection shall be provided. (OFC 507.5.6 &OFC 312) 30. CLEAR SPACE AROUND FIRE HYDRANTS: A 3 foot clear space shall be provided around the circumference of fire hydrants. (OFC 507.5.5) 31. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC) LOCATIONS: FDCs shall be located within 100 feet of a fire hydrant (or as approved). Hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway or drive aisle,fully visible, and recognizable from the street or nearest point of the fire department vehicle access or as otherwise approved. (OFC 912.2.1 & NFPA 13) • Fire department connections (FDCs) shall normally be located remotely and outside of the fall-line of the building when required. FDCs may be mounted on the building they serve, when approved. • FDCs shall be plumbed on the system side of the check valve when sprinklers are served by underground lines also serving private fire hydrants. BUILDING ACCESS AND FIRE SERVICE FEATURES 32. EMERGENCY RESPONDER RADIO COVERAGE: In new buildings where the design reduces the level of radio coverage for public safety communications systems below minimum performance levels, a distributed antenna system, signal booster, or other method approved by TVF&R and Washington County Consolidated Communications Agency shall be provided. (OFC 510, Appendix F, and OSSC 915) http://www.tvfr.com/DocumentCenter/View/1296. • Emergency responder radio system testing and/or system installation is required for this building. Please contact me (using my contact info below)for further information including an alternate means of compliance that is available. If the alternate method is preferred, it must be requested from TVF&R prior to issuance of building permit. • Testing shall take place after the installation of all roofing systems; exterior walls, glazing and siding/cladding; and all permanent interior walls, partitions, ceilings, and glazing. 33. KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for building access may be required for structures and gates. See Appendix B for further information and detail on required installations. Order via www.tvfr.com or contact TVF&R for assistance and instructions regarding installation and placement. (OFC 506.1) Commercial/Multi-Family 3.5—Page 4 EXHIBIT B Attachment 34. FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION: Rooms containing controls to fire suppression and detection equipment shall be identified as "Fire Control Room." Signage shall have letters with a minimum of 4 inches high with a minimum stroke width of 1/2 inch, and be plainly legible, and contrast with its background. (OFC 509.1) 35. PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers; building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property, including monument signs. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Numbers shall be a minimum of 4 inches high with a minimum stroke width of 1/2 inch. (OFC 505.1) If you have questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me at 503-259-1504. Sincerely, 20 kn. ql John Wolff Deputy Fire Marshal II john.wolff@tvfr.com Cc: A full copy of the New Construction Fire Code Applications Guide for Commercial and Multi-Family Development is available at http://www.tvfr.com/DocumentCenter/View/1296 Commercial/Multi-Family 3.5—Page 5 EXHIBIT B Department of TransptiteatI8Wnt 2 ( 0 regOn Region 1 Headquarters 123 NW Flanders Street Portland,Oregon 97209 4-1a10 Kate Brown,Governor (503) 731.8200 FAX(503)731.8259 August 19th,2020 ODOT Case No: 10624 To: Agnes Lindor,Associate Planner From: Marah Danielson, Senior Planner Subject: DKS August 12th, 2020 TPR Assessment Scoping Memo CPA2020-00001 and ZON2020-00001: Aman Property Comprehensive Plan Amendment&Zone Change 11655 SW Pacific Hwy, Tigard, OR On August 10th, ODOT submitted comments on the findings of the draft DKS and Associates Transportation Planning Rule(TPR)assessment memo dated 7/2/20.As explained in these comments,the TPR assessment analysis must be based on a comparison between the reasonable worst case traffic generation under the existing Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations compared to what would be allowed in the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations. The ITE code for Shopping Center was assumed for the draft TPR assessment memo and is not the reasonable worst case scenario under the proposed land use designation. ODOT recommended the city require the applicant to revise the TPR assessment memo using a 24 hour AM/PM store which would generate more trips considering the size of the lot proposed to change to general commercial use. We anticipated that the applicant would provide an updated TPR assessment memo utilizing a higher trip generating use assumption for the general commercial use. In an email to city staff on August 11,DKS proposed to use a fast food restaurant with drive through and a coffee/donut shop with drive through as the reasonable worst case scenario for the commercial parcel. Since they were proposing two buildings on the site and a coffee/donut shop has a significant number of pass by trips, ODOT provided comments to city staff recommending the they be required to use a fast food restaurant with drive through and a 24 hour convenience store(AM/PM)which generates more destination trips.We also recommended that the study area include all intersections between the OR 217/OR 99W interchange and the 72nd/OR 99W intersection(both included). Prior to conducting the TIA,ODOT and the city should be in agreement on the scope of work. ODOT has subsequently received the DKS August 12th,2020 TPR Assessment Scoping Memo for review. The Memo proposes to use fast food restaurant with drive through and a coffee/donut shop drive through as the worst case scenario for the commercial parcel. The study area is proposed to include OR 99W intersections at SW Dartmouth St and SW 72'Ave. Attachment2HIBIT B We have the following comments on the scoping memo: 1. Proposed Trip Generation-Because the coffee/donut drive through has a significant number of pass by trips it does not represent the land use with the reasonable worst case traffic generation. ODOT recommends that this use be replaced with a 24hr convenience store(AM/PM)which has much lower pass by trips. 2. Growth Rate-The Tigard TSP should be used to determine the annual growth rate(1 or 2 percent). 3. Study Area-The study area should include the OR 217/OR 99W interchange and SW 72"d/99W intersection. 4. Trip Generation-The scope assumes both a trip generation reduction to pass by trips as well as a 10%reduction for being in a mixed use location which will underestimate the trip generation. ODOT recommends that the trip generation reduction be limited to pass by trips only. We ask that the city require the scoping memo to be updated to reflect the above recommendations. If not,ODOT would appreciate the opportunity to discuss with city staff their decision regarding scoping requirements. It is our understanding that DKS will be submitting a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)to evaluate impacts of the proposed land use regulation amendments on the transportation system and inform the city's TPR finding. As such, ODOT request the opportunity to review and comment on the TIA and determine any significant affected on State highway facilities by the proposed CPA/ZC for this property. Local governments must make a finding that the proposed amendment complies with the Transportation Planning Rule(TPR), OAR 660-012-0060. There must be substantial evidence in the record to either make a finding of"no significant effect"on the transportation system, or if there is a significant effect,require assurance that the land uses to be allowed are consistent with the identified function,capacity, and performance standard of the transportation facility. Until a TIA has been submitted for city and ODOT review and comment,there will not be enough evidence in the record for the city to make findings that the proposed amendment complies with the TPR. There are only 8 days between now and the Planning Commission Hearing on August 31St. City staff is working to complete the Staff Report to send to the Planning Commission this week. While ODOT makes every effort to review and comment on TIA's in a timely manner to ensure the land use record is sufficient for the city to make an informed decision,there is limited time before the scheduled hearing. Provided ODOT receives a TIA by Friday August 21St,we should be able to provide comments to the city in time for the Planning Commission hearing. However, this may not provide city staff or the applicant the opportunity to respond to ODOT comments prior to the hearing. If you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact me at 503.731.8258 or marah.b.danielson@odot.state.or.us. Attachment2HIBIT B 1111/ City of Tigard TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: December 21.2020 TO: Affected agency FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Agnes Lindor.Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2429 Email:AgnesLntigard-or.gov CPA2020-00001 / Z0N2020-00001 - AMAN - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a comprehensive plan map amendment from General Commercial and Medium- Density Residential to Medium-High-Density Residential. The applicant is also requesting a zoning map amendment from General Commercial and R-12 to R-25. LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway;Washington County Tax Map 1S136CA Tax lot 01600. ZONE: Existing: C-G and R-12 / Proposed: C-G and R-25. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: General Commercial and Medium-Density Residential / Proposed: General Commercial and Medium-High-Density Residential.APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.710,Land Use Review Procedures;and 18.790,Text and Map Amendments;Comprehensive Plan Goals 1,2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1,2, 10;and Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Titles 1. Link to materials: htttpps://tigard-my.sharepoint.com/:£/g/personal/agnesl tigard- or gov/Eo wLgyb95DiVYezdXhnokBYWtk021oWZOdfNgwZlJpvg?e=Wp015i From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: THURSDAY. JANUARY 7. 2021. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date. please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. I PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person(s) Commenting: I Attachment2HIBIT B III " City of Tigard REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TIGARD DATE: December 21,2020 RECEIVED TO: Affected agency DEC FROM: City of Tifyard Plannirle Division V d z02� CITY OF TIGyRD STAFF CONTACT: Agnes Lindor.Associate Planner PLANNING/ENGINEERING Phone: (503) 718-2429 Email:ApnesL tigard-or.frov CPA2020-00001/ Z0N2020-00001 - AMAN - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a comprehensive plan map amendment from General Commercial and Medium- Density Residential to Medium-High-Density Residential. The applicant is also requesting a zoning map amendment from General Commercial and R-12 to R-25. LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway;Washington County Tax Map 1S136CA Tax lot 01600. ZONE: Existing: C-G and R-12 /Proposed: C-G and R-25. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: General Commercial and Medium-Density Residential /Proposed: General Commercial and Medium-High-Density Residential.APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.710,Land Use Review Procedures;and 18.790,Text and Map Amendments;Comprehensive Plan Goals 1,2, 10;Statewide Planning Goals 1,2, 10;and Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Titles 1. Link to materials: haps://tiQv-rd-m .sharepoint.com/:f:/g/ ersonal/agnes1 ti rd- or_gov/Eo wLLyb95DiVYezdXhnokBYWtk02loWZOdfNgwZlrpvv?e=Wp015i From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application,WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: THURSDAY, TANUARY 7, 2021. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division,13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. I PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: I We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. — Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — Name&Number of Person(s) Commentin -, :re ler LAI ON so 3 7!? 2..713 I EXHIBIT B Attachment Agnes Lindor From: Wolff, John F. <John.Wolff@tvfr.com> Sent: Thursday,January 7, 2021 4:29 PM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: Re: CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001:Aman REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Agnes, As this CPA and re-zoning request has no bearing on firefighting access or firefighting water supply at this juncture, TVF&R has no objection or comments on this request Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Have a great week-end! John Wolff Deputy Fire Marshal Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue 503-259-1504 From:Agnes Lindor<agnesl@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 1:17 PM To:Jeremy Tamargo<jeremyt@tigard-or.gov>;Jeffrey Lain<jeff.lain@tigard-or.gov>; Mark VanDomelen <markv@tigard-or.gov>;John Goodrich <johng@tigard-or.gov>; landusenotifications@oregonmetro.gov <landusenotifications@oregonmetro.gov>; ODOT_R1_DevRev<ODOT_R1_DevRev@odot.state.or.us>; Naomi Vogel <Naomi_Vogel@co.washington.or.us>; Samantha.ridderbusch@centurylink.com <Samantha.ridderbusch@centurylink.com>;Jackie Humphreys<HumphreysJ@CleanWaterServices.org>; Smith,Julia <julia.smith@ziply.com>; Wells, Russell <russell.wells@ziply.com>; brian.kelley@nwnatural.com <brian.kelley@nwnatural.com>; steve.hursh@pgn.com <steve.hursh@pgn.com>; Wolff,John F. <John.Wolff@tvfr.com>; ryan.smith@tvwd.org<ryan.smith@tvwd.org>; Sarah Alton <sarah.alton@tvwd.org>; Development_Review@trimet.org<Development_Review@trimet.org> Cc:Joe Wisniewski <joew@tigard-or.gov> Subject: CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001: Aman REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ***The sender is from outside TVF&R-Do not click on links or attachments unless you are sure they are safe*** CPA2020-00001/ Z0N2020-00001 - AMAN - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a comprehensive plan map amendment from General Commercial and Medium- Density Residential to Medium-High-Density Residential. The applicant is also requesting a zoning map amendment from General Commercial and R-12 to R-25. LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway;Washington County Tax Map 1S136CA Tax lot 01600. ZONE: Existing: C-G and R-12 / Proposed: C-G and R-25. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: General Commercial and Medium-Density Residential/ Proposed: General Commercial and Medium-High-Density Residential.APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.710,Land Use Review Procedures;and 18.790,Text and 1 Attachment 2HIBIT B Map Amendments;Comprehensive Plan Goals 1,2, 10;Statewide Planning Goals 1,2, 10;and Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Tides 1. Link to materials:https://tigard-my.sharepoint.com/:f/g/personal/agnesl tigard- or gov/Eo wLgvb95DiVYezdXhnokBYWtk021oWZOdfNgwZlTpvg?e=Wp015i From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application,WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: THURSDAY,JANUARY 7, 2021. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date.please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. Thanks! Agnes Lindor I Associate Planner City of Tigard I Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 503.718.2429 Email:AgnesLPtieard-or.gov DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 2 EXHIBIT B Attachment Agnes Lindor From: Jeremy Tamargo Sent: Thursday,January 7, 2021 8:58 AM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: RE: CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001: Aman REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Hi Agnes, No comments from development engineering on the CPA proposal. Regards, Jeremy Jeremy Tamargo, PE City of Tigard Principal Engineer Direct: (971) 713-0281 From:Agnes Lindor<agnesl@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 1:18 PM To:Jeremy Tamargo<jeremyt@tigard-or.gov>;Jeffrey Lain<jeff.lain@tigard-or.gov>; Mark VanDomelen <markv@tigard-or.gov>;John Goodrich <johng@tigard-or.gov>; landusenotifications@oregonmetro.gov; ODOT_R1_DevRev<ODOT_R1_DevRev@odot.state.or.us>; Naomi Vogel <Naomi_Vogel@co.washington.or.us>; Samantha.ridderbusch@centurylink.com;Jackie Humphreys<HumphreysJ@CleanWaterServices.org>; Smith,Julia <julia.smith@ziply.com>; Wells, Russell <russell.wells@ziply.com>; brian.kelley@nwnatural.com; steve.hursh@pgn.com; John Wolff(TVFR) <john.wolff@tvfr.com>; ryan.smith@tvwd.org; Sarah Alton <sarah.alton@tvwd.org>; Development_Review@trimet.org Cc:Joe Wisniewski <joew@tigard-or.gov> Subject: CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001: Aman REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CPA2020-00001 / Z0N2020-00001 - AMAN - REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a comprehensive plan map amendment from General Commercial and Medium- Density Residential to Medium-High-Density Residential. The applicant is also requesting a zoning map amendment from General Commercial and R-12 to R-25. LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway;Washington County Tax Map IS136CA Tax lot 01600. ZONE: Existing: C-G and R-12 / Proposed: C-G and R-25. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: General Commercial and Medium-Density Residential/ Proposed: General Commercial and Medium-High-Density Residential.APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters: 18.710,Land Use Review Procedures;and 18.790,Text and Map Amendments;Comprehensive Plan Goals 1,2, 10;Statewide Planning Goals 1,2, 10; and Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Titles 1. Link to materials:https://ti-ard-my.sharepoint.com/:f/g/personal/a-nesl tigard- or gov/Eo wLyyb95DiVYezdXhnokBYWtk02loWZOdfNgwZlJpvg?e=Wp015i From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application,WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: THURSDAY,JANUARY 7, 2021. You may use the space 1 AttachmenEXHIBIT B provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date.please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions,contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. Thanks! Agnes Lindor I Associate Planner City of Tigard I Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 503.718.2429 Email:AgnesLt'tiRard-or.Rov DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 2 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Deborah Milat (NW) <Deborah.Milat@dpispecialtyfoods.com> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 8:00 AM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: RE: 11655 sw pacfic hwy Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Thank you very much Best Regards, Deborah Milat Sales Associate DPI Specialty Foods 12360 SW Leveton Dr, Tualatin, OR 97062 phone: 503-612-8025 fax: 503-612-8022 www.dpispecialtvfoods.com From:Agnes Lindor<agnesl@tigard-or.gov> Sent:Thursday,August 13, 2020 5:49 AM To: Deborah Milat (NW) <Deborah.Milat@dpispecialtyfoods.com> Subject: RE: 11655 sw pacfic hwy CAUTION:This email originated from outside your organization.Exercise caution when opening attachments or on clicking links from unknown senders. Good morning Deborah- The notice you received is for a change to the comprehensive plan map and the zoning map. The property is currently split designated on the comprehensive plan as General Commercial (C-G) on the southern half of the lot and Medium Density Residential on the northern part of the lot. The zoning is also split on the lot the same way(C-G on the southern half and R-12 on the northern half). The applicant is proposing to move the C-G portion further north (about%of the way to about where Torchwood Lane is stubbed on the east side of the lot) and change Medium Density Residential/R-12 to Medium-High Density Residential/R-25 on the remaining part(about the northern 1/4 or lot). The southern portion is currently already developed with an RV rental business,which is not proposed to change. The norther portion is currently vacant and development of this portion is not proposed with this application. Hope this helps, please let me know if you have any questions.Thanks! 1 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor I Associate Planner City of Tigard I Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 503.718.2429 Email:AgnesL@tigard-or.gov Regards, Deborah Milat This message and its attachments,if any,are confidential.If you have received it by mistake,please let us know by e-mail reply and delete it from your system;you may not copy this message and its attachments,if any, or disclose the contents to anyone.Please send us by fax any message containing deadlines as incoming e-mails are not screened for response deadlines. The integrity and security of this message cannot be guaranteed From: Deborah Milat (NW) <Deborah.Milat@dpisoecialtvfoods.com> Sent: Wednesday,August 12, 2020 4:28 PM To:Agnes Lindor<agnesl@tigard-or.gov> Subject: 11655 sw pacfic hwy Importance: High Hello Agnes, can you please tell me what development is planned for the address given in the notice sent to me? It says it is an Auto shop. Thanks Deborah Milat Regards, Deborah Milat Sales Associate Inside DPI Specialty Foods-Northwest 12360 S.W. Leveton Dr. Tualatin, OR 97062 Tel: 503-612-8025 Fax: 503-612-8022 www.doispecialtvfoods.com 2 EXHIBIT B This message and its attachments,if any,are confidential.If you have received it by mistake,please let us know by e-mail reply and delete it from your system;you may not copy this message and its attachments,if any, or disclose the contents to anyone.Please send us by fax any message containing deadlines as incoming e-mails are not screened for response deadlines. The integrity and security of this message cannot be guaranteed DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 3 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Jean Dahlquist <jdahlqul@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2020 2:44 PM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: PAPA CPA2020-00001 Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Good morning, My name is Jean Dahlquist and I am conducting some research for the Fair Housing Council of Oregon (FHCO). I was hoping to obtain the staff report and all corresponding attachments for CPA2020-00001 the "comprehensive plan map amendment from General Commercial and Medium-Density Residential to Medium-High-Density Residential" when available. We will be reviewing Goal 10 findings specifically, and submitting positive or negative comment letters when appropriate.The goal of the Goal 10 project is to ensure cities/counties are fulfilling their Statewide Planning Goal obligation in regards to Goal 10. Thus, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know that I am available for any questions or staff report review. I'm hoping this can be a collaborative process where we can both learn from each other. In the meantime, we have obtained the following resource to help guide future staff reports: https://www.housinglandadvocates.org/wp- content/uploads/2018/04/Goal-10-Guidance-Letter-to-Cities-and-Counties-signed.pdf. Please confirm receipt of this e-mail, and I look forward to hearing from you soon, Very Respectfully, Jean Dahlquist Fair Housing Council of Oregon Phone: (414)477-1567 E-mail: idahlqu1(a?gmail.com Linkedin 1 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Erica Stevensons <erica ja.stevenson@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 11:10 AM To: Agnes Lindor Cc: ericaja.steyenson@gmail.com Subject: Case Number MLP2020-00002 & Land Partition MLP2020-00007 I Written Comments Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Erica Stevenson 10970 SW 74th Ave Tigard, OR 97223 RE: WRITTEN TESTIMONY I CASE NUMBER CPA2020-0001/ZON2020-00001 Agnes and who it may concern, As mentioned in my voicemail, I am requesting the staff report, and if you are unable to provide this by Wednesday, I would ask that we extend the date of the hearing to allow ample time to review and speak to the proposed changes. The proposed re-zoning is a one-time benefit to the property owner, at the expense of the city of Tigard and the taxpayers. The additional expense includes the monetary cost to the city and the loss of privacy and additional risks to individuals who live in this area. Some of which are listed below. • Business Architecture and Commercial (thru) access to 99 via a narrow residential road, which brings additional traffic, safety issues, and road maintenance • Parking. Additional housing will exuberate the already existing issue around parking on the street • Fire. What happens when there are too many cars on the street and the fire trucks cannot access a house/residential unit? • Does not fit into the neighborhood. The extension of the commercial zoning and the move to R-25 (Medium to High Density) does not align with the zoning on 74th SW Ave (R-4.5) or Torchwood (R-12). Also, the Tigard Woods Condos, which is the property behind/adjacent to Walter's property, has the look and feel of R-12 zoning. They are connected townhomes, and each has two floors, separate entrance, and a garage. • Increase risk/exposure to COVID with higher density housing • Loss of Privacy. Taller buildings give view access into bedrooms • Valuation of Homes. Allowing R-25 zoning (which would include apartments) and extending commercial property would decrease the value of homes on the street with the additional traffic, noise from commercial property and increased crime rates Sincerely, Erica Stevenson 1 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Tom McGuire Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 2:44 PM To: erica.ja.stevenson@gmail.com Cc: Agnes Lindor; Carol Krager; Caroline Patton Subject: RE: Written Testimony Attachments: Tom McGuire.vcf Hello Erica, My name is Tom McGuire and I'm the Assistant Community Development Director for Tigard. Agnes is out on vacation this week so I will respond to your email. Thanks for providing your bulleted list of concerns. Agnes will review those when she returns. Because the applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a Zone Change their application has to be reviewed by both Tigard's City Council and Planning Commission. The Planning Commission meeting is held first. We have a Planning Commission hearing scheduled for August 31. That was supposed to be followed by the City Council hearing that you reference in your email on September 22. However, some issues have come up with the completeness of the applicant's transportation study and so Agnes was not able to finish her Staff Report. Because of that, the Planning Commission will have to continue their hearing to a later date, September 14. Because we already sent out the notice for the 8/31 hearing we have to open that hearing and formally announce that it is continued to a later date but that is all that will happen on the 31st. That, in turn, means that the City Council hearing will also have to be delayed to a later date. We do not yet have a date for the City Council hearing but we will send out notification to everyone on our list again to let them know the new Council hearing date. We make the staff report to the Planning Commission available for the public to review at least a week before the Planning Commission hearing so we will have that available by September 4. You are invited to provide your comments on the proposal and the staff report to the Planning Commission in writing or you may testify at the hearing. Be aware that due to Covid related issues we are doing both Planning Commission and City Council hearings on the Zoom platform online. You can watch the Zoom meeting on video and call in to provide testimony. Agnes will be back next week and will be available to answer any project specific questions you may have. I encourage you to participate in the Planning Commission hearing as well as the later City Council hearing. Tom EXHIBIT B Tom McGuire lCity of Tigard . ', Assistant Community _ 1 Development Director (503) 718-2490',`.'0;k 'TIGA.RD tomm©tigard-or,gov 4 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 wwrw.ti g a rd-o r.g ov From: Erica Stevensons<erica.ia.stevenson@email.com> Sent: Monday,August 24, 2020 12:34 PM To: Carol Krager<carolk@tigard-or.gov> Subject: Written Testimony Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender RE: WRITTEN TESTIMONY FOR CASE NUMBER CPA2020-0001/ZON2020-00001 CASE NUMBER MLP2020-00002 AMAN/M LP2020-00007 I am requesting an extension of the hearing to allow for time to receive and review the staff report. This report was not in the initial letters from the applicant's rep or the hearing documents. I called and emailed Agnes Lindor, and their out of office message indicates it could be a few days until I hear back. Written Testimony The proposed split of the property (MLP2020-00007) and rezoning (CPA2020-0001) is a one-time benefit to the property owner, at the expense of the City of Tigard and the taxpayers. The additional expense includes the monetary cost, the loss of privacy, and additional risks to individuals who live in this area. My concerns are listed below. • Commercial (thru) access to 99 via a narrow residential road, which brings additional traffic, safety issues, and road maintenance • Parking. Additional housing will exuberate the already existing issue around parking on Torchwood and 74th • Fire. What happens when there are too many cars on the street, and the fire trucks cannot access a house/residential unit? • Does not fit into the neighborhood. The extension of the commercial zoning and the move to R-25 (Medium to High Density) does not align with the zoning on 74th SW Ave (R-4.5) or Torchwood (R-12). Also, the Tigard Woods Condos, which is the property behind/adjacent to Walter's property, has the look and feel of R-12 zoning. They are connected townhomes, and each has two floors, separate entrance, and a garage. • Increase risk/exposure to COVID that comes with higher density housing 2 EXHIBIT B • Loss of Privacy. Taller buildings provide views into bedrooms • Valuation of Homes. Allowing R-25 zoning (which would include apartments) and extending commercial property would decrease the value of homes on the street with the additional traffic, noise from commercial property, and increased crime rates • Business Architecture. The commercial property will back up into residential property/zoning. Would a noise ordinance and land buffer be put into place? Sincerely, Erica Stevenson 10970 SW 74th Ave Tigard, OR 97223 DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 3 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: SUSAN FROHNMAYER <susanfrohnmayer@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 3:49 PM To: alexd@migcom.com Cc: Agnes Lindor Subject: Notice of Land Use Public Hearing tonight at 7pm Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Alex I have tried to find a way to connect to the zoom meeting CPA2020-00001 Applicant Walter Aman. The website says it is not available. Please let me know how I can connect to this meeting. It is 3:45 pm. Thank You Susan Frohnmayer 503-939-0243 1 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Ashley Pace <ashleyrenepace@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 7:25 PM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: MLP2020-00002 Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Hi Agnes, My name is Ashley Pace (formerly Ashley Soya), and I own an investment property near the property that is proposed in the following case numbers: CPA2020-00001 ZON2020-00001 MLP2020-00002 MLP2020-00007 I attended the Planning Commission meeting this evening(8/31/20) at 7pm, and noted that the applicant's representative requested a continuance until 9/14/20. I have the following questions: 1. Does this request for a continuance mean that the comment period deadline will be extended? Currently,the deadline is 5pm tomorrow (9/1/20) 2. Will the link for the 9/14/20 Planning Commission meeting be the same as tonight's meeting? 3. Will the request for a continuance this evening also affect the date of the City Council meeting where this application is discussed (according to the notice,this application is currently scheduled to go to the City Council on 9/22/20 @ 7:30pm)? On another note, could you also tell me where the city of Tigard obtains the names and addresses of property owners in situations like this? I've changed my name, ownership structure and mailing address for my investment property some months ago, but the notices from the City of Tigard (and the applicant's representative) are still being sent to an old address, are addressed to my previous name and include the names of previous owners. I would like to make sure that I've updated whatever I need to, in order to ensure that I continue to receive these notices. Thank you for your time! Sincerely, Ashley Pace (formerly Soya) Owner of 10900 SW 76th Pl.,#28 Tigard, OR 97223 Mailing Address: 15863 SE Anderegg Pkwy. Damascus, OR 97089 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Jenn Walsh <jenn.r.walsh@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 6:54 PM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: Aman (CPA2020-00001) This is in regards to the application for zoning change of the above related parcel. My main concern is the traffic that would be created from the additional housing. Primarily the access from the new community onto hwy 99.The access would be via an already stressed Spruce/78th ave to the intersection by the Starbucks. Any traffic study conducted would be lacking accurate numbers considering the pandemic and the high school off of Pfaffle being out.There are times of day that the intersection is impassable already now. Adding this number of daily potential drivers would be a heavy burden on the current homeowners in the immediate area. I would implore the planning commission to take this into sincere consideration, and require a direct access to 99W from the new development in order to approve this zoning change. -Jenn EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Miriam Nelson <miriam_nelson@me.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 11:06 AM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: Aman: MLP2020-00002 Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Hi Agnes, My name is Miriam Nelson and I live with my family on 1196 SW Legacy Oak Way(the corner of Legacy Oak Way and SW Torchwood) I am sending this note to express our family concern about the re-zoning request of 11655 SW Pacific Highway, but furthermore using SW Torchwood as a main entry to a high-density area. SW Torchwood is a street that was definitely not developed for high traffic. It is a very narrow street where it is mostly used for parking and local traffic.Traffic at the end side of Torchwood is local and speed is no higher than 10 mph. In our neighborhood we have several kids that are normally playing on the street, riding bikes, playing with water or going back and forth between the large green space on the other side of Torchwood and our homes.There are family gatherings and neighborhood parties., it is a beautiful community. Opening SW Torchwood and increasing traffic posts a huge risk for our kids.This neighborhood will not be ever again a safe place for kids to play outside and it is heartbreaking. SW Torchwood is the main parking street for our neighborhood as all of our homes are a one car garage an no street parking allowed. Removing any parking on Torchwood will be an absolute chaos for us.Torchwood is such a narrow street that it is even hard for garbage trucks to get in an out, so much that we have been skipped in the past from garbage picked up due to parking and the sharp turn on the intersection with Legacy Oak. Our neighborhood, although is on a private street, has a public easement that connects to Highway 99.Throughout the years we have seen this path increase on walking traffic and with that we have seen increasing problems like homeless trying to live there,finding drug paraphernalia, garbage, etc. We are VERY concern of additional walking traffic, especially when our kids are outside. 1 EXHIBIT B I am not opposed to rezoning the area, however, making SW Torchwood the main entry for a high-density(apartment) area is portraying many problems from our community, most of them affecting safety. I truly believe that if apartments are going to be built,the complex should have its own entry straight from 99 Highway and leave SW Torchwood as it is. I appreciate your time, Miriam Nelson 2 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Angela Swensen <angela@coraggiogroup.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 9:00 AM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: Aman: MLP2020-00002 Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Hello Agnes- My name is Angela Swensen and I live at 11074 SW Legacy Oak Way. We have received notice of Land Use Application regarding the re-zoning of 11655 SW Pacific Highway. We are very concerned about the extension of SW Torchwood Street on to the re-zoned property. Here are our concerns around: 1. Traffic safety: SW Torchwood is a VERY narrow street. Because Legacy Oak Way is a one way street, one stretch of Torchwood is essentially one way flow of traffic and with the sharp turn to SW 74th --it is a blind corner. Increasing traffic on both 74th and SW Torchwood would be very tight and dangerous. 2. Parking: Parking is an issue in our community.The original developer(who went bankrupt) created one-car garages that don't fit most vehicles and because there is no parking Legacy Oak Way(due to the street being too narrow) our community relies heavily on parking on SW Torchwood. If we have other residents (from potential future housing on the Aman property) needing to use that street parking it would create a SIGNIFICANT issue. 3. Our community space: Our HOA(White Oak Village) owns a large green space under the Legacy Oak Tree that is along SW Torchwood. We already have found drug paraphernalia, dog poop and other non-ideal items in a space where our young children play.This is private property and having to monitor and protect this area with the potential expansion of adding in apartments and additional residents would again be a disruption to our community. 4. Access to Public Easement: Legacy Oak Way is a private street that does have a public easement that connects the neighborhood to Highway 99. We are concerned with having people enter our private property to access the easement. We have had lots of trouble with this easement in the past with homeless living there, drug related transactions taking place and people disposing garbage. We would expect these types of events to occur as population would increase. Overall we are a community full of first time homeowners with lots of young children.The safety of our children is what is most important and we are very concerned that the change to SW Torchwood resulting in a significant increase in traffic as well and access to our private street/community spaces. If Mr. Aman would like to re-zone the property it would be desired by this community if they were to the access from his existing property. Otherwise consider re-zoning to a medium density situation again to reduce the impact on our community. Thank you for your time, Angela EXHIBIT B CANGELA SWENSEN sa HR Manager 2240 N. Interstate Avenue coragg+o- Suite 300, Portland, OR 97227 503.493.1452 coraggiogroup.com Download our latest whiteoaoer 2 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: cynthia patelzick <summerfieldcindy@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2020 2:16 PM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: Aman property/case#MLP2020-00007 I am sending in writing, my opposition to the proposal at this property 11655 SW Pacific Highway. Once again I am finding myself trying to protect my small neighborhood and a way of life. As in past projects traffic is probably our number one concern. I am concerned with adding even more vehicles to this tiny, essentially one way street.) don't know how this street can handle a low density housing project, much less high density. I have seen many changes since the Torchwood neighborhood was built at the end of our street. We have fewer numbers and species of birds.The sunlight for our garden has changed.The amount of traffic is getting worse all of the time.The noise is increasing.The livability is changing the values of ours and our neighbors properties. We were a part of the informational zoom and phone call in June.We were told there was a traffic study being done. We haven't seen evidence of any traffic studies on our street or neighboring streets.There is an 18 home project going in around the corner, as I write this letter,that will be impacting the surface streets . We asked the city for a park at that site. Unfortunately,the council chose to ignore the fact that there are no parks in our neighborhood. Perhaps the city can buy the property and create a family neighborhood with a park?We at 10975 SW 74th Ave. , want to be on record opposing the proposed changes to this property. We respectfully ask that you consider the dynamic of this neighborhood and deny a high density designation. Ideally we prefer no continuation of Thornwood Street.Thank you for considering our request. Respectfully John and Cindy Patelzick . Sent from my iPad 1 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Jean Dahlquist <jdahlqul@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 3:01 PM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: Re: PAPA CPA2020-00001 ' This sender is trusted. Hi Agnes, Thank you for your reply! Aside from the case where it is a zone map change but not a comprehensive plan map change (which I do not believe this is, please correct me if I am wrong) Goal 10 findings as well as findings for the other Statewide planning goals as applicable are required.The zone map only situation is under debate.There was some misinformation being distributed for a while, but we have clarified this matter with DLCD for several other cities. I would be happy to double check this matter with the board,then set up an email chain or a phone call if that would be helpful? Respectfully, Jean Dahlquist Fair Housing Council of Oregon Phone: (414)477-1567 E-mail: idahlqu1Pemail.com Linkedin On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 2:53 PM Agnes Lindor<aenesIPtieard-or.eov>wrote: Hi Jean- Because our comprehensive plan has been acknowledged that it is in compliance with Statewide Planning Goals,we do not need to address them specifically. We would however, if we were changing making language changes to the comprehensive plan itself. The approval criteria for CPA/ZON also only requires addressing the comprehensive plan policies. Thank you, Agnes Lindor I Associate Planner City of Tigard I Community Development 1 EXHIBIT B 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 503.718.2429 Email:AgnesL@tiRard-or.gov From:Jean Dahlquist<idahlau1@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, September 10, 2020 12:48 PM To:Agnes Lindor<agnesl@tiRard-or.gov> Subject: Re: PAPA CPA2020-00001 Good afternoon Agnes, And thank you! I was able to obtain the staff report, and I notice you only provided findings for your Comprehensive Plan but not the Statewide Planning Goals. May I ask why? Respectfully, Jean Dahlquist Fair Housing Council of Oregon Phone: (414)477-1567 E-mail: idahlau1@Rmail.com Linkedin On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:24 AM Agnes Lindor<aRnesl@tigard-or.eov>wrote: Hi Jean- I emailed the link out to Erica Stevensons on Monday, I believe you were copied on that email. Here is it, in case you did not receive it: 2 EXHIBIT B https://www.tigard-or.gov/city hall/public hearings.php Thanks, Agnes Lindor I Associate Planner City of Tigard I Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 503.718.2429 Email:AgnesL@tigard-or.gov From:Jean Dahlquist<idahlau1@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, September 10, 2020 10:00 AM To:Agnes Lindor<aenesl@tieard-or.eov> Subject: Re: PAPA CPA2020-00001 Good morning Agnes, Just a friendly inquiry into the staff report. I hope you and yours are staying safe. V/R Jean Dahlquist Fair Housing Council of Oregon 3 EXHIBIT B Phone: (414)477-1567 E-mail: idahlau1@gmail.com Linkedin On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 4:06 PM Agnes Lindor<agnesl@tiRard-or.gov>wrote: Hi Jean- The hearing is actually going to be continued to 9/14.The staff report is not available yet, however, I am attaching the applicant's materials.Thanks, Agnes Lindor I Associate Planner City of Tigard 1 Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 503.718.2429 Email:AgnesL@tiRard-or.Rov From:Jean Dahlquist<idahlau1@email.com> Sent:Thursday,August 20, 2020 2:44 PM To:Agnes Lindor<agnesl@tieard-or.gov> Subject: PAPA CPA2020-00001 Good morning, My name is Jean Dahlquist and I am conducting some research for the Fair Housing Council of Oregon (FHCO). I was hoping to obtain the staff report and all corresponding attachments for CPA2020-00001 the "comprehensive plan map amendment from General Commercial and Medium-Density Residential to Medium-High-Density Residential" when available. We will be reviewing Goal 10 findings specifically, and submitting positive or negative comment letters when appropriate.The goal of the Goal 10 project is to ensure cities/counties are fulfilling their Statewide Planning Goal obligation in regards to Goal 10. 4 EXHIBIT B Thus, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know that I am available for any questions or staff report review. I'm hoping this can be a collaborative process where we can both learn from each other. In the meantime,we have obtained the following resource to help guide future staff reports: https://www.housinRlandadvocates.or /wp- content/uploads/2018/04/Goal-10-Guidance-Letter-to-Cities-and-Counties-siRned.pdf. Please confirm receipt of this e-mail, and I look forward to hearing from you soon, Very Respectfully, Jean Dahlquist Fair Housing Council of Oregon Phone: (414)477-1567 E-mail: idahlau1@nmail.com Linkedin DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e- mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 5 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: JL R. <jerilynr123@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2020 10:29 PM To: Carol Krager; Agnes Lindor Subject: Proposed development and zoning changes, Ref: Aman/CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001, Comments/Concerns Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Attn:Tigard Planning Commission Re: Proposed Project at 11655 SW Pacific Hwy,Washington Co.Tax Map 1S136CA Tax lot 01600 Ama n/CPA2020-00001/ZON 2020-00001 From: Chris and Jeri Reinertsen, 10900 SW 76th PI #25,Tigard, Or As concerned citizens that live in the Tigard Woods Condominium complex at 10900 SW 76th PI#25 we are writing to provide comments and express our concerns.They are the following: Our condominium is along the northern border of the proposed development site and is separated from the property by a wood fence.The exterior wall of our condo is 4 and 1/2 feet from the property's border. Because we border this property very closely our major concern is noise, bright outdoor street and parking lot lighting and loss of privacy that comes with taller buildings and balconies. We would like to know how much of a border will be in place between our property and the new planned residential buildings.Also, will any of the mature vegetation remain? Other important concerns are the devaluation of our property, increased traffic, and decreased safety because of increased ease of access to Hwy 99W. Because of these concerns and potential impact on our quality of living, we are opposed to the R-25 zoning which would add an excess of multiple stacked residential units within a limited area with very limited parking and green space. Thank-you for your consideration of these issues. Chris and Jeri Reinertsen 10900 SW76th PI#25 Tigard, OR (Tigard Woods) EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Carol Krager Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 7:10 AM To: Caroline Patton; Agnes Lindor Subject: FW:Aman/CPA2020-00001 /ZON2020-00001 For September 22, 2020 Council meeting. From: abbottinstrument@aol.com <abbottinstrument@aol.com> Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:58 PM To: Carol Krager<carolk@tigard-or.gov> Subject:Aman/CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender I am a resident here at 10850 SW 74th Ave and have some concerns regarding the proposed zoning change and use of Torchwood and 74th Ave for access to the considered development property. A) 74th Ave. is an under developed street that should not be asked to carry any more traffic than it has now Spruce St is also overburdened with traffic and will only get worse with the residential units going in on Spruce presently B) The townhouses that were built at the end of 74th were ill conceived as far as parking and access Due to the lack of foresight, residents are forced to park illegally and access for emergency vehicles is a very real concern C) This development of high density housing has had a very negative impact on our neighborhood. I have lived here in our house with my wife for 40 years. We raised our children here and are very concerned about the nature of our neighborhood and the negative impacts of these poorly conceived, designed and then approved developments. I want to strongly urge the City of Tigard to fully consider all aspects and ramifications of these proposed projects. Thank you for your consideration of our concerns Bruce Abbott DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 1 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Rachel McCown <rachelmccown@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2020 11:57 AM To: Carol Krager; Agnes Lindor Subject: WRITTEN TESTIMONY FOR CASE NUMBER CPA2020-0001 /ZON2020-00001 CASE NUMBER MLP2020-00002 AMAN/MLP2020-00007 Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender I am reaching out to you to dispute the proposal of increasing the property size/zone of commercial property to 4.22 acres and giving the property access to Torchwood and 74th ave. I am also against changing the residential zoning from R-12 to R-25 ODOT Findings—Insufficient Data on Traffic Report I On page 18, ODOT states they were unable to verify that the existing plan would meet the requirements of OAR 660-012-0060. They reiterate that a higher trip report number is needed to determine the true impact to traffic on page 30 Parking I On page 25 of the Staff Report, the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue state that parking on emergency roads 20 to 26 feet wide should have no parking on both sides of the road, and 26 to 32 should only have parking on one side of the street. • Torchwood and 74th ave do not accommodate this, and there are no plans outlined in the report how the city or property owner of the 5.28 acres will accommodate this need • Eminent domain is required to widen streets to allow for parking and adequate access in front and to the side lot of 11005 SW 74th Ave (whose property line already extends directly into Torchwood) Traffic I As mentioned on page 7 of the Staff report, Engineering and ODOT findings after reviewing the traffic report, indicate there will be off-site traffic impacts.The solution proposed by Tigard is a driving cap that that is to be determined. • The cap and management of traffic needs to a part of the zone change approval process vs. separate approval process that does not include the voice of the community • Covering the costs to provide access to a flag lot does is against Policy 1, which states policies should..serve its citizens' own interests.The owner/developer needs to be accountable for setting up the infrastructure to support the proposed zoning and buildings.The solution to this is to limit the commercial property to the existing access to 99W, putting in a light, and EXHIBIT B removing the barrier that prevents left-hand turns onto 99W (the cost to be covered by the owner) • Also, on page 25,the fire and rescue state that residential property only needs two entrances if over 30 feet tall or has over 100 dwelling units.The residential unit does not require access to 99W and Torchwood Building Height over 30 feet tall I The totality of the 5.28 acres is surrounded on three sides by residential property(2 stories) and is not directly on 99W (50 to 75 feet from the road). • Giving zoning approval for over 30 feet will remove privacy and would give viewable access into bedrooms for the Tigard Wood Condos and the townhomes off Torchwood (SW Legacy Oak Way —Privately maintained road) Noise Ordinance I Per the call on June 25, with the legal team and Walter/owner, all 5.28 acres were zoned commercial at one point.The back 3.23 acres became R-12 to resolve ongoing noise and disturbance issues between Walter/his tenant and the residential units. • What is the city's plan to negate ongoing noise associated with commercial property being surrounded on three sides by residential property?Walter/owner has already shown existing negligence on this point. Sincerely, Rachel McCown Tigard Resident and Registered Voter 2 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: John Stevenson <jdastevenson@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2020 6:28 PM To: Carol Krager; Agnes Lindor Subject: WRITTEN TESTIMONY FOR CASE NUMBER CPA2020-0001 /ZON2020-00001 CASE NUMBER MLP2020-00002 AMAN/MLP2020-00007 Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender I am responding to the proposal of increasing the property size/zone of commercial property to 4.22 acres and giving the property access to Torchwood and 74th Ave. I am also against changing the residential zoning from R-12 to R-25 Current Zoning: Per the call on June 25,with the legal team and Walter/owner, all 5.28 acres were originally zoned commercial.The north 3.23 acres were rezoned R-12 to resolve ongoing noise and disturbance issues between Walter/his tenant and the residential units. • What circumstances have changed or been mitigated to justify reverting back to commercial zoning? • Why was this historical change either not researched or omitted from the planning analysis? Traffic impact: I have concerns regarding the access from the proposed commercial zone to Torchwood and 74th. The proposal does not appear to meet the requirements of ODOT for a complete analysis. The proposal appears to benefit only the current owner at the detriment to the surrounding neighborhood. • The owner creates additional commercial development property while increasing the capacity of the residential development potential. • By allowing the commercial zone access to Torchwood, the proposal effectively turns Torchwood and 74th into a commercial driveway for the property. Since there is no current left hand turn available to 99W,traffic will utilize the residential access in order to avoid the lack of available alternative routes. John Stevenson Sent from Mail for Windows 10 1 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Carol Krager Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 7:11 AM To: Caroline Patton; Agnes Lindor Subject: FW: Reference Aman/CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 For September 22, 2020 Council meeting. Original Message From:Jean Stillwell <jswnw@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2020 3:42 PM To: Carol Krager<carolk@tigard-or.gov> Subject: Reference Aman/CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 My name is Jean Stillwell. I own the unit#35 and reside in the property of Tigard Woods Condos at 10900 SW 76th PI, #35,Tigard Oregon 97223. I have lived at this address for ten years. I strongly disagree with the proposed zoning change and use of Torchwood/74th Ave for the commercial and apartments/residential property. My entrance and exit door, and patio is located just 8'from the fence that borders this property. Directly in front of this fence is the property zoning change in question. This change would directly affect my life and livability and also affect the lives of my near neighbors of Tigard Woods Condos. My life would be negatively affected by an increase in noise, pollution, commercial and additional traffic, safety issues, parking issues, possible fire concerns,lncrease in crime rates, loss of privacy, as my living room, bedroom, and patio could be viewed.Also this plan does not fit into the neighborhood, and would decrease the value of my property. It could increase the risk/exposure to COVID.This property change is directly behind my property. Would a land buffer or noise ordinance be put into place? Please do not approve their request for change. Jean Stillwell 10900 SW 76th Pl. #35 Tigard OR 97223 Sent from my iPad DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 1 RIFAIR EXHIBIT B HOUSING COUNCIL OF OREGON September 14, 2020 City of Tigard Planning Commission 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Re: The applicant is requesting a comprehensive plan map amendment from General Commercial and Medium-Density Residential to Medium-High-Density Residential. The applicant is also requesting a zoning map amendment from General Commercial and R-12 to R-25. (CPA2020-00001) Dear Commissioners: This letter is submitted jointly by Housing Land Advocates (HLA) and the Fair Housing Council of Oregon(FHCO). Both HLA and FHCO are non-profit organizations that advocate for land use policies and practices that ensure an adequate and appropriate supply of affordable housing for all Oregonians. FHCO's interests relate to a jurisdiction's obligation to affirmatively further fair housing. Please include these comments in the record for the above-referenced proposed amendment. As you know, all amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map must comply with the Statewide Planning Goals. ORS 197.175(2)(a). When a decision is made affecting the residential land supply, the City must refer to its Housing Needs Analysis (HNA) and Buildable Land Inventory(BLI) in order to show that an adequate number of needed housing units (both housing type and affordability level)will be supported by the residential land supply after enactment of the proposed change. In addition, the staff report contains no findings addressing the Metro Housing Rule OAR 660-007-0060.Housing Land Advocates v. Happy Valley,_Or LUBA_, (LUBA Nos. 2016-031/105, March 24, 2017). The staff report for the proposed comprehensive plan and zone map amendment recommends its approval. However, the report does not include findings for Statewide Planning Goal 10, describing the effects of the proposed changes on the housing supply within the City. For 1 FAIR EXHIBIT B HOUSING COUNCIL OF OREGON example, what kinds of housing units are needed by the City, and how will the change from R-12 to R-25 add or detract from potential needed units? The required Goal 10 findings must demonstrate that the proposed zone change does not leave the City with less than adequate residential land supplies in the types, locations, and affordability ranges affected. See Mulford v. Town of Lakeview, 36 Or LUBA 715, 731 (1999) (rezoning residential land for industrial uses); Gresham v. Fairview, 3 Or LUBA 219 (same); see also,Home Builders Assn. of Lane Cty. v. City of Eugene, 41 Or LUBA 370, 422 (2002) (subjecting Goal 10 inventories to tree and waterway protection zones of indefinite quantities and locations). Further,the report should reference the City's HNA to quantify how the potential housing units and types gained will benefit the City. For example, the staff report does state that the proposed amendments will increase the potential housing able to be provided by the land by 2 units. However, it is unknown whether either medium density housing or high density housing is needed by the City, and in what quantities. Only with a complete analysis showing any gain/loss in needed housing as illustrated by the HNA and compared to the BLI can the public understand whether the City is achieving its goals through CPA2020-00001. HLA and FHCO urge the Planning Commission to defer adoption of CPA2020-00001 until Goal 10 findings can be made, and the proposal evaluated under the HNA and BLI. Thank you for your consideration. Please provide written notice of your decision to, FHCO, c/o Louise Dix, at 1221 SW Yamhill Street, #305, Portland, OR 97205 and HLA, c/o Jennifer Bragar, at 121 SW Morrison Street, Suite 1850, Portland, OR 97204. Please feel free to email Louise Dix at ldix@fhco.org or reach her by phone at(541) 951-0667. Thank you for your consideration. LA") /s/Jennifer Bragar Louise Dix Jennifer Bragar AFFH Specialist President Fair Housing Council of Oregon Housing Land Advocates cc: Kevin Young (kevin.young@state.or.us) 2 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Jim Long <bluepgs@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 9:45 AM To: Agnes Lindor Cc: Jim Long Subject: Public Hearing 9/14 Attachments: Great Blue Heron Iocal.JPG Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Good morning Agnes - Why was last night's hearing cancelled? When will the next hearing be? Jim Long CPO-4M Chairperson 503-647-0021 1 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Leela Seeber <leelaseeber@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 8:18 PM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: Regarding Aman/CPA2020-00001/Zon2020-00001 Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Hello- My name is Leela Seeber. I am long time Tigard resident who has just move onto a house on 74th between Spruce and Torchwood. I first heard of this planned development from a neighbor. I am not opposed to growth however I would like to point out the problems that already exist in this area of Tigard. TRAFFIC Spruce and &78th are already recognized as traffic trouble spots and speed bumps have been put in. Daily(before COVID) rush hour at the intersection of Pfaffle and 78th is backed up. INCONSISTENT SIDEWALK AVAILABILITY Pedestrians face the challenge of varying terrain. PARKING Parking is already an issue on Torchwood because the narrow road servicing the tightly packed row houses on Legacy Oak Way forces overflow and larger vehicles onto Torchwood. HOUSING ALREADY UNDER CONSTRUCTION More housing is already currently under construction at the corner of 72th and Spruce behind the Fred Meyer. Before we even feel the crunch of that extra development,you are being asked to make this rezoning decision. I was planning to attend the planning commission meeting this evening and was disappointed to learn it was canceled. I would be interested in attending future meetings or hearings on this subject. Thank you Sent from Mail for Windows 10 1 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Jennifer Flor <jennflor77@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 9:30 AM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: Public hearing question-ZMA 2020-00001 Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Hello Ms. Lindor, What is the status of the comp plan amendment and zone map amendment for the property located at 11655 SW Pacific Highway(CPA 2020-00001/ZMA 2020-00001)? The city website says hearing date TBD, so curious to know if there is a date set or if there have been any determinations in the case. Thank you, Jennifer Flor 10915 SW 74th Ave 1 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: cynthia patelzick <summerfieldcindy@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday,January 7, 2021 10:30 AM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: Torchwood extension We are appalled that this use of the land in question could even be considered for the proposed zone change.To propose commercial property that's only access is through an already difficult residential street is absolutely unacceptable.We vehemently oppose changing the zoning of residential to commercial property. I pray the Tigard City Council deny the zone change. I would ask each member of the city council to perhaps come to our neighborhood and spend some time observing the traffic and parking situation and maybe consider how you might like this sort of change to your to neighborhood.We have a great mix of first time buyers and long time residents. I am truly worried about what this would do to our property values.There's no question that traffic will impact negatively. I am considering rallying my neighbors and getting a lawyer to present our interests. Again,we oppose any commercial use of the newly created lot!!! John and Cynthia Patelzick. Please share with any other interested or affected parties. Sent from my iPad 1 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: cynthia patelzick <summerfieldcindy@gmail.com> Sent: Friday,January 8, 2021 9:24 AM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: Torch wood I appreciate you pointing that out. We are still opposed to changing to high density for the lot in question. For the same reasons I have mentioned previously.Traffic and parking issues will be too much for this neighborhood. Single family homes are more desirable than apartments. Please put us on record as opposed to the change from medium density to high density.Thanks for your help. Sent from my iPhone 1 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: cynthia patelzick <summerfieldcindy@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,January 18, 2021 12:57 PM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: Torchwood Hello Agnes, I imagine this is a day off for you. I am wondering if the meeting Monday is in person. If so where? Enjoy your holiday. I don't need an answer today.Thanks for your help. Cindy Patelzick Sent from my iPhone 1 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Erica Stevensons <erica ja.stevenson@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday,January 24, 2021 12:21 PM To: Agnes Lindor;John Stevenson Subject: Re: CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 Aman Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Hi, I disagree with the zoning change, as the commercial access (lot 2)will have access to Torchwood. As it backups to Torchwood there is no way to prevent them from adding a driveway or informal access to the street. Thanks,Agnes. Erica On Wed,Jan 6, 2021 at 10:20 AM Agnes Lindor<aenesl@tigard-or.eov>wrote: Good morning, Please see attached notice for CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001. New Date and Time of Planning Commission: 7PM on JANUARY 25. 2021 Hearing: Attend the Virtual Hearing: www.tigard-or.gov/city hall/public hearings.php Thank you, Agnes Lindor I Associate Planner City of Tigard I Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 503.718.2429 1 EXHIBIT B Email:AgnesL@tiRard-or.Rov DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e- mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 2 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: John Stevenson <jdastevenson@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday,January 24, 2021 4:58 PM To: Agnes Lindor Cc: Erica Stevensons Subject: RE: CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 Aman Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Good afternoon Agnes, I would like to reiterate my concerns regarding commercial access to Torchwood and thereby, 74th avenue. With the lack of access to eastbound lanes on 99, my concern is that Torchwood and 74th Avenue will function as a de-facto driveway for the proposed commercial zone. We've seen how the Fred Meyer lot is used as a side street by many to access the controlled intersection and do not wish to have the same experience. Both for traffic entering the residential area and for residents to use any access to the commercial property as a thoroughfare as well. The additional concentration of proposed housing coupled with access by a commercial property with no additional ingress or egress options other than Torchwood to 74th to Spruce would degrade the quality of life for the neighborhood. I am opposed to any commercial access to Torchwood. John Stevenson Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From:Agnes Lindor Sent: Wednesday,January 6, 2021 10:20 AM To: Deborah Milat (NW);Jean Dahlauist; Ashley Pace:SUSAN FROHNMAYER: catherinedavidson0@amail.com: Erica Stevensons:Jean Stillwell:Jennifer Walsh:Angela Biancalana; Miriam Nelson:JL R.; rachelmccown@ivahoo.com:John Stevenson; abbottinstrument@aol.com:Jim Long;franprops@icomcast.net; cvnthia patelzick: iefflocksmithPfrontier.com: Leela Seeber: IdixPfhco.org;Julia Monaco; Nichole Jackson; kevin.voung@state.or.us: Jennifer Flor: Ryan Woodward; Deborah Baker Cc:Jeremy Tamargo; DANIELSON Marah B Subject: CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 Aman Good morning, Please see attached notice for CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001. New Date and Time of Planning Commission: 7PM on JANUARY 25. 2021 Hearing: Attend the Virtual Hearing: www.tigard-or.gov/citv hall/public hearings.php Thank you, 1 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor I Associate Planner City of Tigard I Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 503.718.2429 Email:AgnesL@tigard-or.gov DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 2 EXHIBIT B Agnes Lindor From: Leela Seeber <leelaseeber@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday,January 24, 2021 9:17 PM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: Aman CP2020-00001 ZON2020-00001 Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Hello- My name is Leela Seeber and I live on the edge of the north side of the Tigard Triangle. I am writing regarding the proposed zoning change to the current RV NW lot on 11665 SW Pacific Hwy The continued rapid unbridled growth of our area creates traffic frustrations, safety issues, and impacts businesses along 99w. The proposed development and rezoning of this property will impact many people who drive Pacific Hwy, at what is becoming a pressure point for the area-78th/Dartmouth and 99w. Currently, I know of the following construction projects that are already underway Mulitplex at 72nd and Spruce directly behind Fred Meyer Two developments on 72th between Winco and Regal cinema Locust and 76th Pine and 75th How much additional traffic will we experience once these projects are complete? Why add a medium-high density residential to top that off? There will already be more people wanting to get to Fred Meyer, Costco, Winco, and Walmart and limited access points for these major draws. No alternative but to drive, due to few pedestrian options in this area to safely walk. Even 74th the street that this project will feed out into has no sidewalks. The medium-high density rezone will impact traffic on 99w and that will further impact businesses on the street as people seek out less congested areas to drive and shop in. Also,the development of a medium-high density residential may cause more back up on 99w as people and emergency vehicles try to get on 217. Rezoning parcel 1 to medium high density residential aggravates the current traffic problems which are already bound to get worse once the above list of current developments is complete. I respectful ask that you decline the request to rezone. Thank you Sent from Mail for Windows 10 1 -41 City of Tigard • Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Agnes Lindor, Associate Planner Re: CPA2020-00001 / ZON 2020-00001 Aman Date: February 2, 2021 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments on January 25, 2021. At the public hearing Planning Commission recommended approval, by a 5-1 vote in favor with two abstentions. The Planning Commission recommendation is provided as Exhibit B and includes all public comments (Attachment 3 to the recommendation) that were submitted up to the January 25th public hearing. This memo provides additional comments that were received after the Planning Commission public hearing. The comments are summarized below and attached to this memo. January 25, 2021: - An email from Catherine Davidson inquiring about next steps for this project and future development of the residential lot and expressing concerns regarding safety on Torchwood Street. - An email from Mr. and Mrs. Reinertsen inquiring about whether the public comments are being considered and who reviews them. Mr. and Mrs. Reinertsen stated having trouble finding the link to the meeting. January 26, 2021: - An email from Mr. and Mrs. Patelzick expressing difficulty connecting to the meeting and concerns with potential increase in traffic, parking, and lack of sidewalks and park spaces. Attachments: - January 25, 2021: Catherine Davidson and RL Reinertsen - January 26, 2021:John and Cindy Patelzick 1:511C SSW, a.... Blvd. ...Tigard, Oregon Ifg„ : ; 223 * 503.639.4171 TTYRelay: 5O36842772 `,vwv,,,vigard"'o.r'.,yov Agnes Lindor From: CATHERINE DAVIDSON <catherinedavidson0@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,January 25, 2021 8:55 PM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: Re: CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 Aman Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender l Block sender Hi Agnes, I just finished attending the Planning Commission Meeting where the proposal was approved. Are you still our contact moving forward? I just want to make sure that we get ahead of any planned development and can better organize to protect the safety and property of those who live along Torchwood, White Oak and 74th. It still very much concerns me that appropriate improvements will not or even can not be made to accommodate 43 additional units accessing through Torchwood. I understand that the Planning Commission decision really wasn't to take all of these specific concerns into account with only 4 additional units but I am really trusting this process and what I've heard thus far that this, and our community, will be properly cared for. I sincerely hope that trust is not misplaced. Thanks in advance for any insight you can provide on next steps. Thanks, Catherine On Wed,Jan 6, 2021 at 10:20 AM Agnes Lindor<agnesl@tigard-or.,g'>wrote: Good morning, Please see attached notice for CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001. New Date and Time of Planning Commission: 7PM on JANUARY 25. 2021 Hearing: Attend the Virtual Hearing: w w tigard-or.rov/city hall/public hearlrrvs.php 1 Thank you, Agnes Lindor Associate Planner City of Tigard I Community Development 13125 SW Hail Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: 503,718,2429 Email:AgnesL@tigard-or.gov Lek;M : or G 01''Tigard :enipk:3:ytasaE,, r Er S tr.:, L, 18E:0•-rj a y.;s Lias to . may be d 0 wmthcwarty unmw. axmitfi•f.)M disclosure under Ore.;lain Pic Records Law. E S am "T oad a co •fLwdrca. whh the 0 rE3gr:3 nALmLwtraLwe Rdes CtGen Era Records tLwtoa Catherine Davidson (503)975-8243 catherinedayidson0@grnaiLcom 2 Agnes Lindor From: JL R. <jerilynr123@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,January 25, 2021 9:13 PM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: Tonight's planning commission meeting, 1-25-2021 Caution! This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender l Block sender Hi Agnes, I was wondering why the comments submitted by the public via email weren't mentioned during the meeting for Aman/CPA2020-00001. Are they being considered?Who looks at them? I also had trouble finding the link to the meeting because of the "off line" notice on the City of Tigard page.The link was not clear and I had to make several attempts to get into the meeting. I usually link from a notice in my email of the meetings but I did not get a recent reminder of this meeting. Thank-you,JL Reinertsen of Tigard Woods i Agnes Lindor From: cynthia patelzick <summerfieldcindy@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 12:31 PM To: Agnes Lindor Subject: Torchwood Good morning Agnes. I wanted to let you know that I also had some difficulty with the connection for last nights meeting. I wonder if others had the same issues. I heard one gentleman expressing an issue. I tried calling and got feedback, I also got a black screen for part of the presentation. However I saw and heard enough to be dissatisfied with the recommendation. I appreciate the ability to at least voice my concerns. I will say,4 more units may not impact the city much, but it will absolutely make a difference for our community. I am also noticing how it was glossed over,the fact that 74th and the surrounding surface streets will be impacted by the added traffic. Also,' heard one of the council members saying something about lower income residents needing access to the bus lines via the sidewalk accessible by Legacy Oak Way. First of all, that statement made me think that he already knows about the plan for lot#1. Second, as people expressed last night, there is no safe walking access to the sidewalk leading to Highway 99 from Torchwood. People are forced to park on the sidewalk,and in the fire lane because of the lack of parking.The City of Tigard voted against our wishes for the development on Torchwood.The traffic and parking were our concerns at that time,and low and behold our concerns have come true.l seem to remember the city making the neighborhood responsible for that walkway. I am pretty sure they are having their landscapers maintain the sidewalk to Highway 99. I could be mistaken, but is it private property? I had heard that they had considered a gate with a code at one time. I am wondering why some of the people making these recommendations are satisfied looking at these sites via google earth. I do appreciate those of you that put shoes on the ground in our community. I think you're making choices that affect people's lives. I know you have to make tough choices. I am not against commercial growth. I am not against homes on that property. I would prefer a zone change that would allow similar homes to those going in on 72nd and Spruce. I am for balance, I will repeat,we need parks on this side of town. I respectfully suggest a visit to any sites you may be considering now and in the future.While I have no doubt my words will not change last nights outcome, I appreciate being heard. I would appreciate you sharing this with anyone in the process, including my neighbors. I appreciate your help with all of these issues . I know your job is difficult at times. Hope you're having a great day!John and Cindy Patelzick. Sent from my iPad 1 CITY OF TIGARD Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done TIGARD Aman Comprehensive Plan and ZoningMap Amendment City Council Hearing Community Development I February 23, 2021 CITY OF TIGARD Spruce St,a— , ) ] 1 —1 L[ —I ! _IJ Li -I i _hi ii rj Project Information -�, i H, �,J - Fred =_ a - Meyer / 11655 SW Pacific Hwy ),I : .-- J _I . J J 1 / 5.36 acres (3 lots) J i - �urclJ,wood 5t ? J �. SII �-- � J --J - J _1 _____1 _1 � _i / RV rental business: m -] ' 11i _I . - JJ J Lot2and3 (southof M1J J. - =' '� rJ� , _r' ._1 ,-.-- j- - 1 -J _1 1. -I,,„-"Z., 1,1--'',.:\ \II Torchwood) _1 / Vacant: Lot 1 (north Ji 1, f] of Torchwood) __, t, ._Ir L —i _ NO • f 11� Nor a.- Q CITY OF T I Project Information Fred Meyer / Comprehensive Plan designations: General Commercial (Lot 3) and Medium Density Residential (Lots 1 & 2) / Zones: C-G; Lot 3 (2.57 acres) , R-12; Lot 1 & 2 �;��r (2.79 acres) Qai.�{�c CITY OF TIGARD Project Summary / Proposed Applications: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Change from Commercial General and Medium Density Residential to Commercial General and Medium-High Density Residential Zoning Map Amendment Change from C-G and R-12 to C-G and R-25 CITY OF TIGARD Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment f k_._. INED[Li1- IIGN /NEDIYI� -wow / Existing: DEN51Ty RE5lDENTIAL k---"DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Low DENSITY Re5iDENTRL General Commercial . MEDIUM DENSITY MEDIA SIREN ESIDEN RELY RESIDENTIAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 2.57 acres (Lot 3) 1Parcel 1.4b acres - Parcel 1 { 7•S�b acres 1 Med. Density Res. : ./ - 2.79 acres (Lots 1 &2 1"%-s,' Parcel z MEDIUM '� Parcel 2 iMDIUM DENSITY 1.33 acres 7.33 acres MEDIUM DENSITY - 2IDEAITIRL MEDILM DENSITY RES NTIAL RESIDENTIAL /}MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL / P ro p o se d . RESIDENTIAL - Parcel 3 Parcel 3 2'57 acres 257 acres General Commercial . GENERAL COMMERCIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL 3.9 acres (Lot 2 & 3) Med.- High Density Res. : 1.46 acres (' GENERAL COMMERCIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL (Lot 1) I r EXISTING COMP PLAN DESIGNATION PROPOSED COMP PLAN DESIGNATION CITY OF TIGARD Proposed Zoning Map Amendment (u___, EXT5• R-25 re'-� EXTG• R-25 / Existing: EXTG. R-q.5zG. R_4.5 EXTG• R-72 PROPOSED R-25 C-G : 2.57 acres Parcel 7 Parcel 7 (Lot 3) 7•q6 acres s, 7•Si6 acres R-12: 2.79 acres Lots 1 & 2 '� Parcel 2 2 Parcel 2 (.11( ) 7 33 acres (71 EXTG R 72 7.33 acres EXTG• R-72 7X15• R-72 li EXTG- R-72 1 EXTG• R-72 f 1i PROPOSED C-G / Proposed : Parcel 3 Parcel 3 2-57 acres 2.57 acres C-G : 3.9 acres LK TG, C-G — • EXTG C-G • (Lot2 & 3) R-25: 1.46 acres I, (Lot 1) EXTG• C-5 -- EY-TO C- . lei lei F Net increase in density is four units EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING CITY OF TIGARD Findings / The proposal has demonstrated compliance with all applicable comprehensive plan polices and map designations. / There are adequate public facilities to serve the property at the intensity of the proposed zoning. CITY OF TIGARD Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed plans and public testimony and recommends approval of the: • Comprehensive plan map amendment (CPA2O2O- 00001); and • Zoning map amendment (Z0N2020-00001). CITY OF TIGARD Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done TIGARD Aman Comprehensive Plan and ZoningMap Amendment City Council Hearing Community Development I February 23, 2021 11655 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS CITY COUNCIL HEARING FEBRUARY 23,2021 C C) z 3 > -13L __ . /411. Aro i 1 • l m m - —— —41: /i , 1,. 4 • j e_ j 781h Ave _ _., _ f L `- ! 1 y I 11q1 L.- . r . • ti's.-. ' .L1_ = TSE 1h P1: i [1::: -....... i____ : .. . . \\*.JIMI61 ' L „„ it J. ,05..Jrerl _TIL_ L I ' V ft `li LI LO, 7,. 1I t - - '1 ;'V .\_ L� t _ � - 7; r -- • 4L .. L I-U.11 T' ' ?. • +,h nvo 1, L _ 'l rk CW 2']Rln All TIMING/BASIS FOR REQUEST Potential sale of residential portion of property to affordable housing developer Affordable housing developer must have zoning in place prior to application for funding If approved, affordable housing developer can complete application(s) for funding MEETS CITY GOALS FOR HOUSING OPTIONS Implements Comprehensive Plan Goal 10. I and related actions to provide diverse housing types for current and future residents. Supporting diverse housing types (Policy 3) Adjacency to transit (Actions v and vi) PROPOSED ZONING MAP AMENDMENT a 1 -_�,�EXTG' 5-35 r� �y EXrG• R-25 � it EX•TG• .R-4•:, L.TG• R-4.5 1 Existing . �1f EXiG• R-72 i PROPOSED.R-25 C-G : 2. 5 7 acres (Lot 3) i Parcel 7 Parcel 7 i 7.46 acres r❑,i , -.. 746 acres R- 12 : 2 . 79 acres (Lots 1 & --- ---4/- - , 2) Parcel 2 1 Parcel 2 e Pro o S e d ■ 7.33 acres EXTG 5-72 7.33 acres EXTG• 5-72 p 6X-TG 5-72 I � 1/4'`41 EX7G• R-72 EXTG R l2 PROPOSED C-G C-G : 3 .9 acres (Lot 2 & 3) �' Parcel 3 Parcel 3 I 2.57 acres 2.57 acres R-25 : 1 .4 6 acres (Lot 1) EXTG. C-G 7 PX-16. C-G Net increase in density is four units .01 I- r EXTG- C-L EXTG• C- , I I I EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE REQUIREMENTS Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-012-0060 Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) requires a traffic assessment for zone changes. Compares the change in vehicle trip potential (i . e., trip generation) between the existing zoning and proposed zoning . Changes should not create a significant impact on the transportation system beyond the current land uses, and to be consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standard of the impacted facilities. - TRIP GENERATION The vehicular trips generated were estimated using ITE trip generation rates for similar uses. Assumed ITE land uses may not reflect the actual development that occurs. Represents the reasonable worst-case trip generation potential for the land given the wide array of uses that would be allowed within the assumed zoning . TRIP GENERATION EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING INTERSECTION MOBILITY TPR TARGET LOS DELAY (SEC) V/C LOS DELAY (SEC) V/C COMPLIANCE Ci m ll SPRUCE ST AM Peak Hour ST_ OR 99W/SW 72nd Avenue 1.10 v/c C 29.7 0.90 C 32.7 0.92 Yes Proret OR 99W/SW Dartmouth Street 1.10 v/c E 68.4 1.06 E 75.9 1.07 Yes Q OR 99W/Highway 217 4 ,,i Northbound Ramp 0.85 v/c B 16.2 0.94 B 16.6 0.95 No R0 OR 99W/Highway 217 ii 99W 0.85 v/c C 32.3 0.92 C 33.4 0.93 No IS. PFAFFLE ST Southbound Ramp Q Z {Z EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING INTERSECTION MOBILITY TPR 1 n TARGET LOS DELAY V/C LOS DELAY V/C COMPLIANCE3 (SEC) (SEC) .,l PM Peak Hour 4 \Mill OR 99W/SW 72nd Avenue 1.10 v/c D 35.3 0.85 D 36.2 0.87 Yes TH ST OR 99W/SW Dartmouth Street 1.10 v/c D 37.1 0.84 D 38.5 0.86 Yes OR 99W/Highway 217 0.85 v/c B 12.8 0.75 B 12.9 0.76 Yes Northbound Ramp 11 OR 99W/Highway 217 0.85 v/c C 28.7 0.91 C 29.0 0.92 No '''?1.7 Southbound Ramp 11 Bolded values indicate an intersection that exceeds the mobility target - FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OR 99W/SW 72nd and OR 99W/SW Dartmouth St. meet TPR under current and proposed zoning . The OR 99W / Highway 217 Ramp intersections slightly exceed mobility targets during the a . m . and/or p. m . peak periods and OR 99W / Highway 217. Trip cap is proposed for Lot 2 as a condition of approval to mitigate the potential effect on the operations of the intersections. With the trip cap, the application meet meets the requirements of the TPR, as described in section 660-012-0060 of the Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR). AIS-4581 5. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/23/2021 Length (in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: Refer the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment to the Voters Prepared For: Sean Farrelly Submitted By: Caroline Patton, Central Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Council Resolution Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Does the presented resolution meet the City Council's expectations which are needed for referral of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment to the electors of the City of Tigard at the May 2021 election? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Approval of this resolution adopts the ballot title language and refers to the voters the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY City Council unanimously approved Ordinance No. 21-04 implementing the Substantial Amendment to City Center Urban Renewal Plan after a public hearing on February 9, 2021. At that time, City Council directed staff to prepare a ballot title and subsequently reviewed the ballot title at its February 16, 2021 meeting. The attached resolution includes Ordinance 21-04 (Exhibit 1) and the reviewed ballot title (Exhibit 2) for Council's final review and approval. Per City Charter, Ordinance 21-04 will not go into effect unless approved by Tigard voters at the May 2021 election. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could choose to postpone the ballot measure process and refer the plan amendment to voters in a future election. COUNCIL OR TCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS 2019-2021 Tigard City Council Goals Strategy 2.2 - Continue to make Downtown Tigard a place people want to be by making substantial progress on projects that attract new residential and business investment. Evaluate the size and scope of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan to determine whether tax increment resources in the downtown are sufficient to meet council objectives. Prepare recommendations regarding the City Center urban renewal area's possible continuation. City Center Urban Renewal Plan Tigard Comprehensive Plan Special Planning Areas- Downtown Goal 15.2 Facilitate the development of an urban village City Strategic Plan 2020-2025 Priority 3 — Ensure development advances the vision DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION February 16, 2021- Discussion Regarding City Center Substantial Amendment Referral Ballot Title Language February 9, 2021- Council Public Hearing on City Center Substantial Amendment December 15, 2020- TCDA Board initiation of public review of City Center Substantial Amendment October 20, 2020 - City Center Substantial Amendment Update Fiscal Impact Cost: $6,284,384 Budgeted (yes or no): no Where Budgeted (department/program): If approved, funds would be budgeted in the TCDA Additional Fiscal Notes: Impact of original MI from FY 2019-20 through FY 2035-36: ($4,650,313) Impact of new MI from FY 2035-36 through FY 2048-49: ($6,284,384) Total Impact (original and new): ($10,934,697) Estimated Revenue Sharing: FY 2035-36 through FY 2048-49: $4,215,949 The impact to the City of Tigard due to the proposed amendment's increased MI is $6,284,384 which reflects the $4,215,949 in revenue sharing which runs FY 2035-36 through FY 2048-49. This amount is balanced against the future incremental tax revenues receivable upon district expiration. After the district is closed down, tax revenue to the City of Tigard will be greater than would have been otherwise collected in the absence of the urban renewal investments. Attachments Resolution Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21- A RESOLUTION APPROVING REFERRAL TO THE ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF TIGARD AT THE MAY 18,2021 ELECTION,THE QUESTION OF WHETHER TO AMEND THE CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN WHEREAS,Section 47 of the City of Tigard's Charter requires voter approval for any urban renewal plan or amendment that initiates the use of tax increment financing and WHEREAS, the City Council of Tigard adopted Ordinance No. 21-04, which amends the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment by increasing the maximum indebtedness by $20.8 million, adding projects, and extending the duration of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan (the"Plan");and WHEREAS,the City Council of Tigard,pursuant to the City's Charter,desires to refer Ordinance No. 21-04 to the electors of the City of Tigard. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: Measure.A measure election is called in and for the City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon, for the purpose of submitting to the electors of the City of Tigard, a measure that, if approved,would amend the City Center Urban Renewal Plan by increasing the maximum indebtedness and extending the duration of the Plan. A copy of the measure is attached and incorporated as Exhibit 1. SECTION 2: Election Conducted by Mail. The measure election shall be held on Tuesday,May 18, 2021. The precinct for the election shall be all of the territory within the corporate limits of the City of Tigard. As required by ORS 254.465 and ORS 254.470, the measure election will be conducted by mail by the Washington County Elections Department, according to the procedures adopted by the Oregon Secretary of State. SECTION 3: Notice of Ballot Title. The City Elections Officer is directed to publish notice of receipt of the ballot title in the Tigard Times or The Oregonian in compliance with ORS 250.275(5). SECTION 4: Ballot Title. Pursuant to ORS 250.285 and ORS 254.095,the Tigard City Council directs the City Elections Officer to file a Notice of City Measure Election in substantially the form of Exhibit 2,with the Washington County Elections Office,unless,pursuant to a valid ballot title challenge, the Tigard City Council certifies a different Notice of City Measure Election be filed, such filing shall occur no earlier than the eighth business day after the date on which Exhibit 2 is filed with the City Elections Officer and not later than March 18,2021. SECTION 5: Explanatory Statement. Pursuant to ORS 251.345, the Tigard City Council directs the City Manager to prepare a Measure Explanatory Statement for publication in the county voters' pamphlet; said statement shall be filed with the Washington County Elections Office at the same time the Notice of City Measure Election is filed by the City Elections Officer. SECTION 6: Delegation. The Tigard City Council authorizes the City Manager or a designee of the City Manager to act on behalf of the City of Tigard and to take such further action as is necessary RESOLUTION NO.21- Page 1 to carry out the intent and purposes herein in compliance with the applicable provisions of law. SECTION 7: Effect of"Yes"Vote. If a majority of eligible voters vote "yes" on the measure, Ordinance No. 21-04 will become operative, and the City will amend the City Center Urban Renewal Plan by increasing the maximum indebtedness, adding projects, and extending the duration of the Plan. SECTION 8: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2021. Mayor-City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO.21- Page 2 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL O INANCE NO. 21 04 AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND FINDINGS RELATING TO AND APPROVING THE TIG.,\AD CF.CY CENTER UR.11 \N RENEWAL _,VMENDMENT AND DIRECTING THAT NOTICE OF APPROVAL BE PUBLISHED WHEREAS, the Tigard City Center Development Agency (the "Agency"), as the duly authorized and acting urban renewal agency of the City of Tigard, Oregon, is proposing to undertake certain urban renewal activities in a designated area within the City pursuant to ORS Chapter 457;and WHEREAS, the Agency, pursuant to the requirements of ORS Chapter 457, has caused the preparation of the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Plan Amendment"), The Plan Amendment increases the maximum indebtedness and authorizes certain urban renewal activities within the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area (the "Area"); and WHEREAS, the Agency has caused the preparation of a certain Urban Renewal Report dated February 9, 2021, attached hereto as Exhibit B (the "Report") to accompany the Plan Amendment as required under ORS 457.085(3);and WHEREAS, the Agency forwarded the Plan Amendment and Report to the City's Planning Commission (the "Commission") for review and recommendation. The Commission considered the Plan Amendment and Report on ranuary 4, 2021, made a recommendation that the Plan Amendment conformed with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and recommended Tigard City Council ("the City Council") adopt the Plan Amendment, attached hereto as t'Ahibit C (the "Planning Commission Recommendation");and WHEREAS, the Plan Amendment and the Report were forwarded on December 16, 2021 to the governing body of each taxing district affected by the Plan Amendment, and the Agency has therefore consulted and conferred with each taxing district;and WHEREAS, on January 12, 2021 and January 26, 2021, representatives of the City met with the Washington County Board of Commissioners to review the Plan Amendment, including proposed maximum indebtedness for the Plan Amendment; and WHERAS, representatives of the City met with the boards of the largest taxing districts: Washington County, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, and the Tigard-Tualatin School District to request concurrence for the maximum indebtedness increase;and also briefed die Tigard Tualatin Aquatic District;and WHEREAS, the City Council has received or anticipates receiving concurrence for the maximum. indebtedness increase via adopted resolutions from Washington County,Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue and the Tigard-Tualatin School District;and WHEREAS, the City Council has not received other written recommendations from the governing bodies of the affected taxing districts; and ORDINANCE No. 21-Ot1 Page 1 \MERE—NS, on January 19, 2021 the City caused notice of the hearing to be held before the City Council on the Plan Amendment, including the required statements of ORS 457:120(3), to be mailed to registered voters within Tigard's incorporated limits;and WHEREAS, on February 9, 2021 the City Council held a public hearing to review and consider the Plan Amendment, the Report, the recommendation of the Tigard Planning Commission, and the public testimony received on or before that date and to receive additional public testimony; and WHEREAS,after consideration of the record presented through this date, the City Council does by this Ordinance desire to approve the Plan Amendment. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CifY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Plan Amendment complies with all requirements of ORS Chapter 457 and the specific criteria of 457.095(2)(a) through (g), in that, based on the information provided in the Report, the Planning Commission Recommendation, and the public testimony before the City Council: 1. The process for the adoption of the Plan Amendment, has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 457 of the Oregon Revised Statutes; 2. The area designated in the Plan Amendment as the Tigard City Center-Urban Renewal Area is blighted, as defined by ORS 457.010(1) and.is eligible for inclusion within the Plan Amendment because of conditions described in the Report in the Section "Existing Physical, Social, and Economic Conditions and Impacts on Municipal Services", including the existence of inadequate streets, trails, sidewalks,parks, and utilities, and.a prevalence of depreciated values resulting from underdevelopment and underutilization of property within the Area, ORS 457.010(1)(e) and (g); 3. The rehabilitation and redevelopment described in the Plan Amendment to be undertaken by the Agency is necessary to protect the.public health, safely or welfare of the City because absent the completion of urban renewal projects, the Area will fail to contribute its fair share of property tax revenues to support City services and will fail to develop or redevelop according the goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan; 4. The Plan Amendment conforms to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and documented ancillary documents and provides an outline for accomplishing the projects described in the Plan Amendment, as more fully described in the Plan Amendment and in the Planning Commission recommendation; 5. No residential displacement will occur as a result of the acquisition and disposition of land and redevelopment activities proposed in the Plan Amendment and therefore the Plan Amendment does not include provisions to house displaced persons; 6„ The acquisition of real property provided in the Plan Amendment is necessary for the development of infrastructure improvements including parking improvements in the Area, for the development of public spaces and for assisting in private redevelopment of the Area and this property is identified in the Plan Amendment; ORDINANCE No, 21-0 LI Page 2 7. Adoption and carrying out the Plan Amendment is economically sound and feasible in. that eligible projects and activities will be funded by urban renewal tax revenues derived from a division of taxes pursuant to section lc,Article TX of the Oregon Constitution and ORS 457.440 and other available funding as more fully described in the Sections V, VINTI, and VIII of the Report; 8. The City shall assume and complete any activities prescribed it by the Plan Amendment; and 9. The Agency consulted and conferred with the affected overlapping taxing districts prior to the Plan Amendment being forwarded to the City Council. 10. The Agency gave presentations to the Boards of Washington County,Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue and Tigard-Tualatin School District on the proposed amendment and requested that the districts adopt resolutions approving the MI increase, SECTION 2: The Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment is hereby approved based upon review and consideration by the Tigard City Council of the Plan Amendment and Report, the Tigard Planning Commission recommendations, each of which is hereby accepted,and the public testimony in the record. SECTION 3: The City Manager shall forward forthwith to the Agency a copy of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: The Agency shall thereafter cause a copy of the Plan Amendment to be recorded in the Records of Washington County, Oregon. SECTION 5: The City Manager,in accordance with ORS 457.115, shall publish notice of the adoption of the Ordinance approving the Plan Amendment including the provisions of ORS 457.135,in The Oregonkm no later than four days following adoption of this Ordinance. This ordinance shall be effective upon the Washington County Board of Commissioners'vote for concurrence on the maximum indebtedness increase and certification by the County Elections official that the ordinance has received voter approval at the election conducted on May 18,2021. PASSED: By, alierif1"01.4—kote of all vincil members present after being read by number and title only, this__q.111'''day of "Zalii4LrYi 2021. Carol A. Krager,City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of „ 2021. i•2? • •• • Jason B. Snider, Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney 2/10/2021 Date ORDINANCE No. 21-0 LI Page 3 Exhibit A Proposed new text is shown in double-underline. Deleted text is shown in strikethrough. Explanatory language shown in italics. TIGARD CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AMENDMENT Only the proposed changes are shown, current plan can be viewed at: https://www.tigard- or.gov/urbanrenewal/ I. Introduction The Original Plan 1 mss hada duration of 20 years (see Chapter XI), meaning that no new debt y414 would be incurred after Fiscal Year 2025/2026. T#3 maximum amount of indebtedness (amount 3f tax increment financing for projects and programs) that may be issued for the Plan is Twenty Two Million Dollars and No Cents ($22,000,000). The first substantial amendment was developed in 2016 and went to voters in the May 2017 election. It amended the boundary and updated the plan as needed. The second substantial amendment was developed in 2020 and went to the voters in the May 2021 election. It added proiects. increased the maximum indebtedness. and updated the plan as needed. The maximum amount of indebtedness (amount of tax increment financing for proiects and programs) that may be issued for the Plan is Forty-Two Million Eight Hundred Thousand dollars and no cents (S42.800.000). No new debt will be incurred after Fiscal Year 2034/2035. II. Goals and Objectives Goal 3— Downtown's transportation system should be multi-modal, connecting people places and activities safely and conveniently. Objectives: 3B: Concurrent with proposed street improvements, and in conformance with the Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP), provide public and private parking facilities. bike lanes, sidewalks, pedestrian crossings and other pedestrian, and bicycle facilities that promote multimodal usage, access and safety. 1 Goal 5 Promote high quality development of retailoffice and residential uses that support and are supported by public streetscape, transportation, recreation and open space investments. Objectives: 5A: Provide development incentives and technical assistance programs that encourage business and property owners to develop pjects that are consistent with the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan vision, the 2019 Affordable Housing Plan, the City of Tigard Strategic Plan 2020-2025, and the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. SC: Provide forproperty acquisition to support thisoal. U|. Outline of projects The Plan identifies transportation projects, induding Street improvements, streetscape improvements and bicycle/pedestrian facilities improvements, which will increase multimodal connectivity throughout the Area and make downtown Tigard a safer and more accessible destination. The Plan also includes Parks, Public Spaces and Public Facilities pjectsthatvvi|| beaut|hvtheArea, increase neighborhood livability and provide opportunities for residents, visitors and downtown workers to participate in a wide range of community and recreational activities. Planning and Development Assistance Programs identified in the Plan will facilitate the development, redevelopment and rehabilitation of private property in the Area. The programs will encourage Area business and property owners to invest in projects that will increase the economic vitality of downtown Tigard, add affordable housing units to the Area and support the goals and objectives of the Tigard Downtown Plan and the City's Comprehensive P'an. IV. Map and Legal Description of Urban Renewal Area No changes to this section Urban renewal projects authorized under the Plan, which may be undertaken by the Agency, are described beow.- - €I-& to Tb preserve and enhance the Area's natural resources, projects will be designed and implemented with consideration for ecologically sensitive areas and to minimize the impacts of development on the environment. Property acquisition may be required for these 2 projects. Further, some of the projects described hereinvviU require participation of other public agencies. Figure 2 is replaced and Figures 5,6 and 7 are removed from the Plan. A. Street Improvements 7. Construction of New Streets Construction of new streets to orovide connectivitvxvithin the Area. as identified by hash marks on Figure 2. B. Streetscpe Improvments— No changes to this section. C. Bike/Pedestrian Facilities 10.Tigard Heritage Trail (Main Street to Hall Boulevard) This proiect will increase pedestrian access and provide new recreational 0000rtunities for residents. workers and visitors to downtown. The oroiectxvi|| build a new path connectina Main Street to the existina multi-use trail that connects the Commuter Rail oarking lot to Hall Boulevard. and include historical/educational installations and other amenities. 11. Fanno Creek Trail lmDrovements Improvements to the Fanno Creek Trail within the Area will include new trail connections. lighting. accessibility improvements. boardwalks and wavfinding. O. Parks de/eteF/guneS E. Public Spaces de/eteF/gure6 2. Plazas The design and construction of public plazas that will serve as public gathering spaces is a project under the Plan. This prjectvxi|| encourageabroaderrangeof active and passive recreational uses in downtown and attract more residents and visitors to the area. The Universal Plaza project will provide a large public space that includes a water feature, covered area, connection to Fanno Creek Trail, restrooms, and other amenities. F. Public Facilities de/eteF/oune 7 2. Public Parking Facilities The design and construction of new public parking facilities is a prject under the Plan. As new shopping, recreational and entertainment uses, including the proposed performing arts center and public market, are established in the downtown area, new public parking facilities will be needed to accommodate the anticipated increase in parking demand. This nroect includes structured oarkinR that would jointly serve employment uses as well as visitors and customers to the downtown, 4 G. Planning and Development Assistance 5. Affordable Housing Development Assistance Grants and technical assistance to encourage new regulated affordable housing. and preservation of naturally occurring affordable housing. J. Finance Fees and Plan Administration This category allows for repayment of costs associated with implementation of the Plan. including but not limited to ongoing administration and financing costs associated with issuing long-and short-term debt. relocation costs. and other administrative costs. VI. Relationship to Local Objectives A. City of Tigard Community Development Code The City of Tigard Community Development Code establishes zoning districts, which govern allowed uses and contain development standards.The Area encompasses property within the City's commercial, industrial, and parks and recreation and industrial zoning districts. According to the City's Development Code, the purpose of commercial zoning districts-is ehenr i . co„n ere-ia- °ee- gciud ngi °^d office !rse.s - that are conveniently accessible to moto-rists, bicyclists and pedestrians and designed to minimize potential adv.. ._•-. ..,°.., ,mange of employment opportunities and ecanemic benefits for local residents, to implement the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan related to land use planning and economic development by: A. Ensuring that a full range of goods and services are available throughout the city so that residents can fulfill all or most of their needs within easy driving distance and, ideally, within easy walking and biking distance of their homes; B. Ensuring that a full range of economic activities and job opportunities are available throughout the city; and C. Minimizing the potential adverse impacts of commercial uses on residential uses by carefully locating and selecting the types of uses allowed in each commercial zone. The purpose of Tigard's industrial zoning districts is toprovide-a broad -range of atrial rc;. . : , • -: to local Fi - - -implement the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan related to land use planning and economic development by: 5 A. Ensuring that a full range of economic activities and iob opportunities are available throughout the city: and B. Minimizing the potential adverse impacts of industrial uses of industrial uses on nonindustrial uses by carefully locating and selecting the types of uses allowed in each industrial zone. The purpose ofTigard's parks and recreation zoning district is to preserve and enhance publicly-owned open space and natural and improved parkland within the city. This zone is intended to serve many functions including: A. Providing opportunities for both active and passive recreational facilities to meet neighborhood, community, and regional needs: B. Providing contrast to the built environment: C. Providing opportunities to strengthen community identity, improve public health, and foster interactions between citizens: D. Providing economic development by creating a desirable public image and robust aualitv of life: E. Recognizing that publicly-owned parks have a special relationship to the community and are an important resource: F. Providing flexibility in the use and development of recreational facilities as the city responds to changes in demographics, program needs, and external regulatory requirements: and G. Allowing for the efficient implementation of plans and improvements to parks, recreational facilities, and open areas with appropriate reviews where compatibility issues may arise. A detailed description of commercial, industrial, and parks and recreation zoning districts within the Area and corresponding development standards are described in Section VH below. The Plan implements the public investments necessary to generate development that is consistent with Mixed-Use Central Business District, General Commercial District, Industrial Park Districti_and Parks and Recreation District,a-r4 Profec.J cRa4 Commercial Districts as well as the R 11.5 Low Density Residential District, R 12 . Further, the Plan will help ensure that the Area develops efficiently, with high quality, attractive development that creates an identity and sense of place unique to downtown Tigard. 6 B. Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies Parks. Recreation.Trails. And Onen Snace The Comprehensive Plan addresses access to parks. recreation. trails. and open space that enhance the livability of a community and contributes to the well-being of its residents. Parks policies supported by the Plan include: Goal 8.1 Provide a wide variety of high aualitv park and open spaces for all residents. including both developed areas with facilities for active recreation and undeveloped areas for nature oriented recreation and the protection and enhancement of valuable natural resources within the parks and open space systems. Policy 1 Tigard shall acauire. develop and maintain a diverse system of parks. trails. open space and recreational facilities that are safe. functional and accessible to all of its Population. Goal 8.2 Create a Citywide network of interconnected on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle trails. Policy 1 The City shall create an interconnected regional and local system of on-and off-road trails and paths that link together neighborhoods. parks. open spaces. maior urban activity centers and regional recreational opportunities utilizing both public property and easements on private property. The Plan includes multiple proiects that support the City's park system vision and recommendations. In particular. the Fanno Creek Park Improvements and Urban Green Spaces proiects will upgrade and increase multimodal access to existing parks and open space areas and create new green space and recreational areas that will draw residents. shoppers and visitors to downtown Tigard. The Plan includes additional trail connections through the Tigard Heritage Trail and Fanno Creek Trail proiects and the development of Universal Plaza. a central gathering place for residents and visitors to Tigard. C. Transportation System Plan Goals and Policies TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN—only additions are shown, all other findings remain the same. Where some of the goal and policy language is already existing, it 7 is not shown in double underline, new goal and policy information is shown in double underline. Goal 2 Transportation Efficiency— Develop and maintain a transportation system for the efficient movement of people and goods. Policy 9 The city shall reauire the provision of appropriate parking in balance with other transportation modes. The Plan includes streetscape improvements and bicycle/pedestrian system improvements designed to encourage alternative modes of transportation to the automobile. By filling gaps in the existing sidewalk system, installing new bike lanes and upgrading existing bikeways to standard, the Plan will help create a complete system of bicycle and pedestrian facilities that enables pedestrians and bicyclists to commute safely and efficiently to and within downtown. The Plan includes street improvements that will address motor vehicle needs in and around downtown Tigard. Projects such as the Scoffins Street/Hall Boulevard/Hunziker Realignment and Highway 99W intersection improvements will reduce congestion and improve circulation while creating a safer environment for drivers, pedestrians and bicyclists. The Plan includes trail connections through the Tigard Heritage Trail and Fanno Creek Trail proiects and provides funding for the construction of new streets providing connectivity in the Area. The Plan also provides funding for a parking structure to serve employment uses as well as visitors and customers to the Downtown. 8 D. City of Tigard Park System Master Plan' Goal 1 Provide a wide variety of high aualitv park and open spaces for all residents. including both: - Developed areas with facilities for active recreation: and - Undeveloped areas for nature-oriented recreation and the protection and enhancement of valuable natural resources within the parks and open space system. Goal 2 Create a Citywide network of interconnected on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle trails. Goal 3 Provide Tigard residents with a broad range of recreational. cultural and educational activities. The Plan includes multiple proiects that support the City's park system vision and recommendations. In particular. the Fanno Creek Park Improvements and Urban Green Spaces proiects will upgrade and increase multimodal access to existing parks and open space areas and create new green space and recreational areas that will draw residents. shoppers and visitors to downtown Tigard. The Plan includes additional trail connections through the Tigard Heritage Trail and Fanno Creek Trail proiects and the development of Universal Plaza. a central gathering place for residents and visitors to Tigard. E. Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan No changes to this section F. Affordable Housing Plan In 2019 the City of Tigard adopted the Affordable Housing Plan —Tigard Housing Strategy Implementation Plan. The purpose of the Tigard Housing Strategy Implementation Plan (THSIP) is to identify strategies and implementation steps needed to increase the supply and affordability of housing within the City of Tigard. The outcome of the proiect will be recommendations for adoption of housing strategies and policies. including amendments to municipal and development code. to implement an Affordable Housing Plan. The THSIP identified tools to assist in the development of affordable housing. one of which was tax increment funds. 1 There is a parks section in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan as well as a Tigard Park System Master Plan. Both are included as they differ slightly in their verbiage. 9 The Plan includes a proiect category of Affordable Housing Development Assistance to provide grants and technical assistance to help encourage the development of affordable housing in the Area. G. CitvofTigard Strategic Plan 2020-2025 The City of Tigard Strategic Plan was adopted by City Council on September 22. 2020. The Vision of the Plan is:Tigard: An eauitable community that is walkable. healthy. and accessible for everyone These are the strategic priorities and supporting obiectives and actions from the Strategic Plan that connect to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Strategic Priority 2. Create a well-connected. attractive. and accessible pedestrian network. 2.1 Create a well-connected pedestrian network that links all Tigard residents and businesses. 2.1 C. Identify and pursue new funding sources to build the pedestrian network. 2.1 D. Bring parks and trailheads within a 10-minute walk of every Tigard resident. 2.1 E. Expand the pedestrian network annually. 2.2 Tigard's pedestrian network is attractive accessible, safe and well-maintained. 2.2 B. Design the trail system to serve both recreational and active transportation Purposes. Strategic Priority 3. Ensure development and growth support the vision. 3.1 Pursue land development that maximizes public health benefits while increasing connection between people and community destinations. 3.1 B. Locate and grow businesses to support walkabilitv. connectivity. and accessibility for all business locations. 3.1 C. Build mixed-use development that is inclusive of housing. shopping. employment. services and integrates transportation options. 3.1 D. Fully implement the City's Complete Streets policy. 3.1 G. Invest in public spaces that eauitablv serve the city's diverse residents. workers. and visitors. 3.2 Focus development-associated resources in parts of the city that have the capacity to serve. house. employ and attract the most people with the least impact on Tigard's natural systems and the climate. 3.2 B. Facilitate Transit Oriented Development (TOD) that supports employment. housing. and community services. 3.3 Understand the effects of development on vulnerable Tigard residents and mitigate those impacts within proiects and over time. 3.3 C. Support a balanced. diverse mix of business sectors and employment opportunities. 3.3 D. Ensure transportation investments and improvements are providing eauitable benefits and impact to the entire population. 10 3.3 E. Advance eauitable economic opportunity. 3.4 Proactively intervene as necessary to meet the housing needs of all community members. 3.4 A. Prioritize funds to support the creation and retention of affordable housing in Downtown Tigard. the Tigard Triangle and Washington Sauare. 3.4 D. Increase the housing mix in the city to meet the needs of smaller households. including singles. young families. and older adults. The City Center Urban Renewal Plan conforms to the City of Tigard Strategic Plan and implements many portions of the Strategic Plan. The Plan helps implement the strategic priority to "Create a well-connected and accessible pedestrian network" as proiects provide funding for increased trails and fornew streets providing connectivity in the Area. The Plan helps implement the strategic priority "Ensure development and growth supports the vision" as it includes the development of the Universal Plaza. a central gathering place for Tigard residents. In addition. the Plan provides structured parking and assistance for new mixed-use development including affordable housing development. VII. Proposed Land Uses This section is deleted in its entirety and replaced with new information. Land uses within the Area are governed by the City of Tigard Development Code. The Development Code establishes zoning districts that implement the Tigard Comprehensive Plan.The districts govern the allowed uses and contain development standards, Currently, lard in the.. .f -°- ••. -• E. -'•--s-c Dictr ct(C-°.[3}, :eneral Commercial (C C) Pr "1;..'•t, aF.a .-M * •....... - •y....... • y , • .1rt• ... y+ 7 .+-,R A ° P .1 r 4 "" +:i1'i a,},_' �.T-. yam,.:-..'' .T.._�}�-v) 2 d-i�}�.` - � s i � �... s.:r.r, _.�rsbrl aml�'��Z'7� - ._e_ es • ,. ., �, :. :� '• « .; .:�.- eel rfellcws+ "The CBDzo e- q.it _, _ _ e*. _ *--. ; "strict,-c-entered or-the utorie rte+, incl" -a i-x of cii .ta'- efficc u - . .;, - -; y attached.housing, ". -:s-i-ty--e-f 12 U4`ir caFici--Gr- ai h+iafet" °' exp" pcipilti fa `.. .'-•- -+ x-it tic the R 10 zoning-di=.pilot, are permitted 4 v it- :-•.::--ef us-os,including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities, facilities with , .r.` •, -.;.r :°t �,:- -- nrniont 3n `•• r are l=am moi}+n conditionally°„ »-_-. `- s 2-f 2r5and 2 ,-- - " ant required. With exception of buildings within 1Q . . ; -° - 11 where a '10 foot hm'igh 'r tr 'ie; 'r • r _ height c-f 20 feet is prescribed for ci ua^teal. even reg'*- - _ -. -. r '* r _ r �T f �./YLTC.:Y9Tr'4:Y-'W-4'. V•... f'aY'.'.. ev e the s JIt4.. a r f sR ICISCT t net limit-* tr -. - `r *went repairand-atorag-o, mini permitted conditionally." , i . __ r-i ', .- ,-, -e - � : -;en'Iwre m-7,— . . . , foot side and rear yard setbacks arc required w err t-hc zone a r. r - '.;- d cov f ,°% n- g i-remcnt of 15% maximum height limit of'15 feet are also prescribed. "The C P zoning district is designed to accommodate CMC and business/professional services and compatible support services, e,g°, convenience retail and personal services, restaurants, in close proximity t-c r epi iul a;c-as c-nW - -e - v ._. in t-he Tigard Trizcgle and Pull lYs,. r' '.R.. rr. �° -••r».., -° i! .rR w'a, k 4 ::i. th -R--''?0 ze.ning distric ra permitted in conjunc ' ith a-c ,°r.•m r °,a1-aleive cpmen±, Heliports, ., .i ;ed conditionay.-Pei`4r°c:-r^�ti�a-rcfacs- .-�-- 'va-iiiirg-a s°-`&tc-c t- �-intended to serve,� �,=�-=,�,�•e----T,�.- ._ ..»^ ' r.t '.i d: str. ! arc With the eUi:.. °-. --. r. r nnr laa,.,.s se - r._• r., » ii 'hi - - not required in t e- 2.a; ,A lT�"-TT .. - evorage Of 5%, , . .1- #� limit of--44--feat ° dofe min the C Pzo "The R 1.-5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single family homes with or without ✓vrc-cry residential units at e minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. - ,a .-., . -t; ,- � ... Scnae ' . ••-, C-S are a s ° 'i t. to "-t •t-ri °..r +.' 0- #r M f .. . - r ,,-. r.» R ._..- ri°r`.3»r Ir :y.; . .i ?c- •- lots and 90 feet for duplex lots. All residential development is subject tc a :maximum height 12 alar required.The R 11.5 zone loos not ' . w r° . .. . y_ .... - .. " .r _.��. . . •.;..,. ,..: ' •,,....._.... p '..r .. rC_ --ye-of; a+ ng-lisipa-44-Fis--143,-t-s-i-se- 9-f-3,050-square feet.A w-ide range of civic and i st.;tut e:-ate > onditionally." M- t pl•a family . ,,r. .r .y . • 1 - - _ .. - setbavk of 5 fest. Frr beth multiple family and single family dwelling units, a 30 foot sctbac4 . t., of 3-5 fact, maximum lot coverage of 80%and minimum landscape -,�,egta,Q%-a,=c also specified. y.°.,.....�• ..•'s . -_-. =..;.....*,'2.:... . ,. .,o- ... S', : e and newattoched single family and molt: fo,^r-lAy haus-in„ ten: . _ _ 4' t w institutional uses arc permitted conditionally." A- .nim .fit si:?: -E?f o r A t fel detaehh 4�{' -' s, , -sem,=-e•feet or 3,0 uare f-ee-t-pelfit for d +enc requfke€d-gin-the R 25 ..r •. •.. .° . .-5,41afeinir• _ . _ ; . •tback 20 feet and a minimum side yard setback of 10 feet. Single family dweiiing units a;--e r,ubj to minimum front and r r yard setbacks of 11 feet and a minimum side yard setback of 5 feet. "Is-multiple fa.n' . -h•' '• _ r> its, a 30 foot setback is required de . - s ,..ne of 45 feet, maximum lot coverage of 80% and gen°w o,R. r-,> ukr-3pe r. ra t of 20% are General/Commercial CG -The C-G zone is designed to accommodate a full range of retail. office. and civic uses with a citywide and even regional trade area. Except where nonconforming. residential uses are limited to mixed-use developments.A wide range of uses. including but not limited to adult entertainment, automotive eauioment repair and storage. mini-warehouses, utilities. heliports. medical centers. maior event entertainment. and gasoline stations. are allowed conditionally. Mixed Use Central Business District U-CBD-The MU-CBD zone is designed to provide a pedestrian-friendly urban village in downtown Tigard.A wide variety of commercial. civic. employment. mixed-use. apartments. and rowhouses are allowed. 13 Industrial Park I-P - The I-P zone provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing. office. and small-scale commercial uses. such as restaurants. personal services. and fitness centers. in a campus-like setting with no nuisance characteristics such as noise. glare. odor. or vibration. Parks and Recreation Zone PR -The Parks and Recreation (PR) zone is applicable to all city-owned lands intended as parks. open space. and recreational facilities and may be applied within all comprehensive plan designations. City-owned parks. open space. and recreational facilities located in a plan district may retain or receive other than a PR zone designation if it better furthers the goals of the plan district. In addition. other public agencies may reauest a PR zone designation for areas that meet the purpose of the zone. VIII. Property Acquisition and Disposition Tri Met property - tax lot numbers 2S102AA04800 and 2S102AA04801 IX. Relocation Methods No changes to this section X. Tax Increment Financing of Plan The maximum amount of indebtedness that may be issued or incurred under the Plan, based upon good faith estimates of the scope and costs of projects in the Plan and the schedule for their completion is - `€;larc and No Ccnts ($22,000,000). Forty-Two Million Eight Hundred Thousand dollars and No Cents (542.800,000).This amount is the principal of such indebtedness and does not include interest or indebtedness incurred to refund or refinance existing indebtedness. XI. Duration of Plan No new indebtedness to be repaid with tax increment revenues may be incurred after the eth iv°erc�;y twentv-ninth anniversary of the effective date of the Plan. As is common practice in urban renewal plans in Oregon, tax increment revenues may continue to be collected beyond this date. Collection may continue until it is found that deposits in the Commission's debt service fund are sufficient to fully pay principal and interest on indebtedness issued during the twenty years following the effective date of the Plan, either through direct payment of the indebtedness or by payment of principal and interest on bonds or notes issued to finance the indebtedness.Tax increment revenues collected after the twenty-ninth anniversary of the Plan (FY 2034/20351 may only be used to retire outstanding debt.The Plan will be effective on the date that the County certifies the results of the election at which the Tigard voters approve the measure that referred an ordinance approving an urban renewal plan to the Tigard voters. 14 XII. Future Amendments to Plan No changes to this section 15 Exhibit B Report Accompanying the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment Reviewed by the City of Tigard February 9, 2021 Ordinance No. To be sent to vote May 17, 2021 Consultant Team Elaine Howard Consulting, LLC Elaine Howard Scott Vanden Bos Tiberius Solutions LLC Nick Popenuk Ali Danko Rob Wyman ft s x 4 1ak:r+ TABLE OF CONTENTS S I. INTRODUCTION 4 II. EXISTING PHYSICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND IMPACTS ON MUNICIPAL SERVICES 6 III. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF EACH URBAN RENEWAL AREA IN THE PLAN 16 IV. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE URBAN RENEWAL AREA 16 V. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF EACH PROJECT AND THE SOURCES OF MONEYS TO PAY SUCH COSTS 19 VI. THE ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE FOR EACH PROJECT 20 VII. THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUES REQUIRED AND THE ANTICIPATED YEAR IN WHICH INDEBTEDNESS WILL BE RETIRED 24 VIII. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN 29 IX. IMPACT OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 34 X. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY LIMITS ON ASSESSED VALUE AND SIZE OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA 42 XI. RELOCATION REPORT 42 Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment I. INTRODUCTION The Report on the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment (Report) contains background information and project details that pertain to the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan (Plan) Amendment (Amendment). The Report is not a legal part of the Plan, but is intended to provide public information and support the findings made by the City Council as part of the approval of the Plan. The Report provides the analysis required to meet the standards of ORS 457.087, including financial feasibility. The format of the Report is based on this statute. The Report documents not only the proposed projects in the Plan, but also documents the existing conditions in the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area (Area). The Report provides only guidance on how the Plan might be implemented. As the Tigard City Center Development TCDA (TCDA) conducts its annual budget process each year, it has the authority to make adjustments to the assumptions in this Report, particularly in regard to forecast revenues and planned expenditures. The TCDA may allocate budgets differently, adjust the timing of the projects, decide to incur debt at different timeframes than projected in this Report, and make other changes, as allowed in the amendments section of the Plan. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 4 Figure 1—Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Area 0* 04 ,eke' - 4 - f $ $ftp cr * jtl g S'd • 470 4 LES 3 ffi rr • yin , - -- - - 8 git P+ n a $ s s s Tigard City Center URA as E4r Source:2016 Amendment to the Tigard City Center Plan Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 5 It. EXISTING PHYSICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND IMPACTS ON MUNICIPAL SERVICES This section of the Report describes existing conditions within the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area and the Amendment Area and documents the occurrence of"blighted areas," as defined by ORS 457.010(1). A. Physical Conditions The analysis in this section uses data from Washington County Assessor's office from 2016, when the amendment to increase acreage within the City Center Urban Renewal Area boundary was completed.There are not significant changes between 2016 and 2020. 1. Land Use The Tigard City Center Area is 228.96 acres, including 198 tax lots consisting of 185.60 acres and 43.36 acres of right of way. An analysis of property classification data for FYE 2016, from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation was used to determine the land use designation of tax lots in the Area as amended. By acreage, commercial use accounts for the largest land use within the area (51.51%). This is followed by exempt (28.11%) and multifamily residential (11.73%). The total land uses of the Area, by acreage and parcel, are shown in Table 1. Table 1— Existing Land Use of Area Land Use Total Total Percent Tax lots Acres of Acres Commercial 125 95.61 51.51% Exempt 30 52.18 28.11% Industrial 1 6.41 3.45% Multi-family Residential 11 21.78 11.73% Single Family Residential 18 5.45 2.94% Vacant 13 4.17 2.25% Total 198 185.60 100.00% Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 6 2. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations As illustrated in Table 2 and Figure 2—Area Zoning DesignationsFigure 2, the majority (67.56%) of the Area by acreage is zoned as Mixed Use Central Business District. Table 2— Existing Zoning Designations of Area Total Total Percent Zoning Tax lots Acres of Acres Mixed Use Central Business District (MU CBD) 187 125.40 67.56% MU CBD- Planned Development Overlay 1 15.1 8.14% General Commercial 5 21.61 11.64% Parks and Recreation 4 22.50 12.12% Industrial Park 1 0.99 0.53% Total 198 185.60 100.00% Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) and Metro RLIS 2016 Q1. As illustrated in Table 3 and Figure 3, 67.47% of the acreage is designated as Mixed Use Central Business District in the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Table 3— Existing Comprehensive Plan Designations of Area Comprehensive Plan Designation Total Total Percent Tax lots Acres of Acres Mixed Use Central Business District 180 125.22 67.47% General Commercial 5 21.61 11.64% Open Space 12 37.78 20.36% Light Industrial 1 0.99 0.53% Total 198 185.60 100.00% Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with data from the Nashington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) and Metro RLIS 2016 Q1. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 7 Figure 2—Area Zoning Designations Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Zoning Designations : : ,„,itt...*t. „, , Sg v -- S. 2�� g� h::4';'4.,i1. n y a.4.. a^y'�'' '.'fir b�,�T.A.. "91 y'1,rl ::*."..r .` ,;'�a"�W..i:;N: • 4,4 'ems- * =v:" .�; ass. ,4,,,,,.... } '4' .. .40*' h rrt � '�.G•-..:•. '9� T'S "'f 1 x"...�,. r„k.... "'f..::,,�e -�"c� ''�" t fh:w2k yt,�,1:'F�'q xit=�;f:F�'9 iit=�;f:F�'9 x':.t-in ,.. p ,,. ,,,,An } .,:.:,...t4.7 `F '-,vii ter-, .R ter- i yr.-` �s��� , ,x4<o`G `k• ..,-,01: a� mice, - - '.%4I0.0;4641;1 4,,,,01,„w . ,1P�- '-r^ ., ,� ti .vow �N ,' ;Yf -" � �''` fra0,.•. ` v,, • a 0 � E'� Eu� fl,a1H. . t4fi, - � � qsh`.�a�i„ rPu,.54� ' fa"W` � n { � .K:�. � .s `x� . �� ���'' ,,,,,,,_,x.. 4W , - 1S ' _,.. 3 .1,.. g `" 4, 4 - bib .. bTsk " 7"0� c > ",= t0 e�s.�i � � i� gg� #5� �a,� �,kis& - .- • • s , x e 1 -y re ?!.4; i P e .01 P :. m� Zoning ' _V, Mixed Use CBD Planned Development i "` Mixed Use CBD „v;::,;r General Commercial •• Industrial Park Parks and Recreation ra 61 City Center URA v IN go art. I.-..-:t . Source:2016 Amendment to the Tigard CityCenter Plan Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 8 Figure 3—Area Comprehensive Plan Designations Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area } Comprehensive Plan Designations • • teil YZk.fit YZZ•.fit rte Y' _-. * r• 3c,3 - A 3.Z.0.30/-4-4-ft, _ • n k .I" r + "�^E"r"e -`t :' L ' � Rt aA ., t 00 4,*, fc ;i.s:.".+`.y,.- .1 s + ,§y..' :'+'-,;s§&m;.^sy�1.-s" ''-- 1a5.� 'g,,. • - .ib ,-t ''t'i$;%tF' "'' YZ..�I�'t YZz. r. fu.t Yk.' - a 3g '4 - alr a" ;a ?8114.3Wi". : : - " "` �a `" '" � ` �i .3_ , ,�. r;w.3: „}x `,. epi� D0.i . ; + l ., 86s1g; �� tI. Zt `= *Kr,"¢`.'';x*.�,.1 ¢ - " ," ¢- ,^..":Zn,".,'¢k"^;x,4„1 ¢ ... • �, iigi Y--;*- YZk ' ,.Seta. lP,,$,�t 7Z'.VO-.t: *M„4 - ' ,. °. fu.t k.f�.ta:,;�F t .fit YZk. t "�0' - ...v "`` :. :.0 t ri'.''- "fit!,.- " tt.,$ ':E"Y:r E"Y:r Yt -V= •fiat ."P a, 'ter; } ` •.x Comprehensive Plan Mixed Use CBD General Commercial Light Industrial ' Open Space • to 0 City Center URA ' Source:2016 Amendment to the Tigard City Center Plan Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 9 B. Infrastructure This section identifies the existing conditions in the Area to assist in establishing blight. There are projects listed in City of Tigard Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Tigard Transportation Systems Plan that identify these existing conditions. This does not mean all of these projects are included in the urban renewal plan. The specific projects to be included in the urban renewal plan are not changed by this Amendment. They are listed in Table 11. 1. Transportation The CIP identifies transportation needs within the Area. Streets and Intersections There are significant transportation needs within the Area: Table 4—Transportation Needs in the Area Name Description Time Frame Cost Estimate Ash Ave railroad Extend Ash Avenue across the railroad crossing (Burnham tracks from Burnham to Commercial Near-term $3,000,000 to Commercial Street Hall Boulevard widening, Pacific Widen to up to 4/5 lanes, depending on 1 Highway to Fanno corridor plan Near-term $2,500,000 Creek New sidewalks, new asphaltic concrete Main Street Green and the collection and treatment of Street(Phase II) stormwater runoff using low impact Near-term $4,060,500 development approaches. Source:City of Tigard Transportation Systems Plan i As noted in Tigard staff review of this document,the TSP update will change the project description and likely increase the cost. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 10 2. Water The CIP identifies no water needs in the Area. 3. Storm water The CIP identifies one storm water project in the Area: 94045—Commercial Street Stormwater Facility Project Need: Stormwater treatment for a large existing untreated area to meet regional stormwater regulatory permit requirements, Healthy Streams Plan goals and provide mitigation for Main Street and other future projects. Project Description: Construct a stormwater facility, or facilities, to treat stormwater runoff from up to 47 acres that discharge into Fanno Creek meeting outfall-retrofitting goals identified in the regional Healthy Streams Plan. This will be coordinated with the Main Street Green Street Phase 2 Project. Total Project Cost: $376,000 4. Sewer The CIP identifies one sanitary sewer project in the Area: 93059— Downtown Sanitary Sewer Line Project Need: TV inspection shows rehabilitation is needed to protect sanitary sewer lines in sections of Downtown Tigard. The sanitary sewer in this Area was constructed in the 1960s and after years of monthly and quarterly cleaning, the pipe walls have become thin. Project Description: The full project is both inside and outside the Area. It will rehabilitate approximately 2,360 linear feet of sanitary sewer line in Pacific Highway from Hall Boulevard to Main Street and in Main Street from Pacific Highway to Commercial Street. A cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) trenchless method will be used to minimize traffic disruption. Total Project Cost: $355,000 5. Parks and Open Space The Parks and Open Space projects are: Universal Plaza -The project will provide a large public space that can be a venue for community events and will include a water feature, covered area, connection to Fanno Creek trail, restrooms, interpretive art, and other amenities. Total Project Cost: $4,010,000 Fanno Creek Overlook-The project will provide an overlook of Fanno Creek near Main Street and a new connection to the Fanno Creek Trail. Total Project Cost: $840,000 Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 11 C. Social Conditions Data from the US Census Bureau is used to identify social conditions. The geographies used by the Census Bureau to summarize data do not strictly conform to the boundary of the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area. As such, the Census Bureau geographies that most closely align with the Urban Renewal Area boundary are used. The Area is situated at the intersection of seven different Census block groups, each of which extend a great distance beyond the boundary of the Area, including significant residential populations that live adjacent to, but outside of the Area. Only three of the seven overlapping Census block groups include a significant amount of residential land uses within the Area. Thus, the demographic analysis is limited to those three block groups: block groups 1 and 2 in Census Tract 307 and block group 4 in Census Tract 308.01. These block groups have a total residential population of 2,924 as depicted in Tables 5 and 6. Again, the majority of this population lives in areas adjacent to but outside of the Area. The area has 27% Latinx residents. Eighty three percent of the residents identify as White alone. Table 5— Hispanic or Latino Origin by Race in the Area Race Number Percent Not Hispanic or Latino 2,147 73% White alone 1,757 60% Black or African American alone 29 1% Asian alone 108 4% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 15 1% Two or more races 238 8% Hispanic or Latino 777 27% White alone 668 23% Asian alone 8 0% Some other race alone 65 2% Two or more races 36 1% Total 2,924 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2014-18 5-Year Estimates Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 12 The largest age group in the area is 25 to 34 years, 18%, followed by 18 to 24 years at 15%. Table 6—Age in the Area Age Number Percent Under 5 years 184 6% 5 to 9 years 76 3% 10 to 14 years 173 6% 15 to 17 years 134 5% 18 to 24 years 429 15% 25 to 34 years 515 18% 35 to 44 years 408 14% 45 to 54 years 323 11% 55 to 64 years 369 13% 65 to 74 years 143 5% 75 to 84 years 144 5% 85 years and over 26 1% Total 2,924 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2014-18 5-Year Estimates Twelve percent of the adult population in the Area has not achieved a high school diploma. Twenty-six percent of adult residents in the area have earned a bachelor's degree or higher, another 26% have some college experience without a degree, and an additional 22% have graduated from high school with no college experience. Table 7— Educational Attainment in the Area Education Number Percent Less than high school 228 12% High school graduate (includes equivalency) 428 22% Some college 499 26% Associate's degree 248 13% Bachelor's degree 395 20% Master's degree 125 6% Professional school degree - 0% Doctorate degree 5 0% Total 1,928 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2014-18 5-Year Estimates Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 13 The majority of residents, 70%, travel less than 30 minutes to work, including those who worked at home. Table 8—Travel Time to Work in the Area Travel Time Number Percent Less than 10 minutes 301 21% 10 to 19 minutes 469 33% 20 to 29 minutes 222 16% 30 to 39 minutes 246 17% 40 to 59 minutes 87 6% 60 to 89 minutes 86 6% 90 or more minutes 8 1% Total 1,419 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2014-18 5-Year Estimates Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 14 The majority of residents, 66%, drove alone to work. Table 9— Means of Transportation to Work in the Area Transportation Number Percent Drove alone 978 66% Carpooled 108 7% Public transportation (includes taxicab) 144 10% Motorcycle - 0% Bicycle 82 6% Walked 107 7% Other means - 0% Worked at home 60 4% Total 1,479 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2014-18 5-Year Estimates D. Economic Conditions 1. Taxable Value of Property within the Area The estimated total assessed value of the Area calculated with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation for FYE 2020, including all real, personal, manufactured, and utility properties, is $168,286,420. 2. Building to Land Value Ratio An analysis of property values can be used to evaluate the economic condition of real estate investments in a given area. The relationship of a property's improvement value (the value of buildings and other improvements to the property) to its land value is generally an accurate indicator of the condition of real estate investments. This relationship is referred to as the "Improvement to Land Value Ratio," or "I:L." The values used are real market values. In urban renewal areas, the I:L is often used to measure the intensity of development or the extent to which an area has achieved its short-and long-term development objectives. Table 10 below shows the improvement to land ratios for properties within the Area. The majority of tax lots in the area that are not exempt (41.66% of the total acreage) have I:L ratios of less than 1.0. In other words, the improvements on these properties are worth less than the land they sit on. We identify a target I:L ratio of 2.0 for properties in this Area. Only 31 tax lots in the area, including 16.61% of the acreage have I:L ratios of 2.0 or more in FYE 2016. The Area as a whole, is underdeveloped and not contributing its full potential to the tax base in Tigard. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 15 Table 10— I:L Ratio of Parcels in the Area Tax lots Acres Percent of Acres Exempt 30 52.18 28.11% No Improvement Value 14 8.11 4.37% .01-.50 43 31.47 16.96% .51-.1.0 31 37.73 20.33% 1.01-1.5 25 17.77 9.57% 1.51-2.0 22 7.51 4.05% 2.01-2.5 3 2.03 1.09% 2.51-3.0 9 4.32 2.33% 3.01-4.0 13 8.26 4.45% >4.0 8 16.22 8.74% Total 198 185.6 100.00% Calculated by Tiberius Solutions LLC with source data from Washington County Office of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016). E. Impact on Municipal Services The fiscal impact of tax increment financing on taxing districts that levy taxes within the Area (affected taxing districts) is described in Section IX Impact of Tax Increment Financing of this Report. This subsection discusses the fiscal impacts resulting from potential increases in demand for municipal services. The properties within the Area are all within the city limits and future development and demand for services is anticipated in the Area. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF EACH URBAN RENEWAL AREA IN THE PLAN The reason for selecting the Area has not changed from prior Reports; it is to enhance the ability to fund improvements necessary to cure blight within the Area. IV. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE URBAN RENEWAL AREA The projects identified for additional funding are largely already identified in the verbiage of the Plan, but additional funding has been allocated. Following the categories in the Plan, they are shown below. 1. Construction of New Streets Construction of new streets to provide connectivity within the Area as identified by dashed lines on Figure4. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 16 Existing Conditions:The streets shown with dotted lines do not currently exist. Most block sizes in the Area are very large, which limits the amount of street frontage and limits connectivity for all modes of transportation particularly for pedestrians. Figure 4— Potential Future Streets in Area isi'i'i ii Downtown Connectivity Plan Potential Future Streets Map ° , .F r .�,.,a,-'n" ! a1 °x�,. T eR3r ,?'r 4 . _ �fit�.R �Yym G�. ',. SA „'Y ?rye viii s .1, N'Kr� _ 'iYZ'Q rq,k ``hc S 3 Ai Downtown Street Character Types" Upper Hall Boulevard" Main Street Green Street `s Downtown Mixed Use I (Collector) L'4 i wo.r Downtown Mixed Use2(Neighborhood) o-,, Downtown Mixed Use 3 (Upper Burnham) Downtown Mixed Use 4 (Lower Burnham) Urban Residential _------Ailey:Business 0 250 50G 1.000 Feet t 1 ? 1 I I I -Dashed Imes indicate proposed streets .,- ,=,n.Other Streets —1-ail e.3i1iav3.1d Is cutiarali,art X007 1..diI COOTS dasigri stariiaids may'su;ratsa.ia thaw;tanJanis as oily1 --NOWIMO,Rail roads as r ar,Coot ta•ariy. ..� Source:City of Tigard Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 17 2. Tigard Heritage Trail (Main Street to Hall Boulevard) This pjectxv|U |ncnyasepedesthanaccessandprovdenexvnycnyat|ona| opportun|t|esfor residents, workers, and visitors to downtown. The pject will build a new path connecting Main Street to the existing multi-use trail that connects the Commuter Rail parking lot to Hall Boulevard, and include, historical/educational installations and other amenities. Existing Conditions: The Main Street to Tiedeman Avenue section of the Tigard Heritage Trail has been completed. Currently pedestrians who wish to continue on from Main Street to the multi-use path that connects to Hall Boulevard must walk through the Commuter Rail parking lot, most of which has no pedestrian path. 3. Fanno Creek Trail Improvements Improvements to the Fanno Creek Trail within the Area will include new trail connections, lighting, accessibility improvements, boardwalks, and wayfinding. Existing Conditions: The segment through the district is substandard. A new connection to the Universal plaza will be constructed. The deficiencies are: * Not designed or built to current local, regional, or state trail standard and generally too narrow to support the usage it sees today ° Degraded asphalt surface (potential accessibility issues), with tree root heaving in some locations ° Seasonal flooding * Lack of any ighting 4. Plazas: Universal Plaza The Universal Plaza prjectvv||| prov|dea |a[gepub||cspacethatinc|udesavvaterfeature, covered area, connection to Fanno Creek trail, restrooms, and other amenities. Existing Conditions: This mostly vacant property owned by the TCDA is being used as a temporary public space. Conceptual plans for the new plaza have been completed. 5. Public Facilities: Parking Facility This project includes structured parking that would jointly serve employment uses as well as visitors and customers to the downtown. Existing Conditions:There is no structured parking in the Area. As uses intensify and as Universal Plaza is developed, additional traffic is anticipated in the Area. This structured parking would address that need. 6. Planning and Development Assistance: Affordable Housing Development Assistance Grants and technical assistance to encourage new regulated affordable housing and preservation of existing market affordable housing. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 18 Existing Conditions:The existing Plan allows for development assistance but does not specifically call out affordable housing. The need for the creation of affordable housing has been more widely recognized as an important component of the health of the city. The City of Tigard Affordable Housing Plan identified needs and strategies to address those needs. One of the tools to address the shortage of affordable housing is tax increment funds provided through urban renewal areas. 7. Finance Fees and Plan Administration This category allows for repayment of costs associated with implementation of the Plan, including but not limited to ongoing administration and financing costs associated with issuing long-and short-term debt, relocation costs, and other administrative costs. Existing Conditions:This Plan is being implemented by staff. To make the Plan components consistent with the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan, a specific project category is now designated to provide for the ongoing administration of the Plan. V. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF EACH PROJECT AND THE SOURCES OF MONEYS TO PAY SUCH COSTS The estimated allocation of funds to specific projects shown in this Report are the best estimates of future expenditures at the time of preparation of the Amendment. The TCDA will be able to review and update the allocations on an annual basis when they prepare the annual budget. Nominal dollars are year of expenditure dollars inclusive of inflation, which is assumed to be 3.0% per year. Table 11— Projects to be Completed Using Urban Renewal Area Funds Projects (nominal $) (constant 2020 $) Public Spaces $ (7,461,020) $ (6,570,000) Street Improvements $ (3,883,900) $ (3,100,000) Streetscape $ (1,087,820) $ (725,000) Ped/Bike Facilities $ (1,999,605) $ (1,350,000) Public Facilities $ (6,556,200) $ (6,000,000) Parks $ (1,739,490) $ (1,150,000) Affordable Housing Dev Assistance $ (2,880,720) $ (1,950,000) Planning and Dev. Assistance $ (1,852,693) $ (1,480,000) Property Acquisition $ (5,649,780) $ (3,900,000) Administration $ (3,018,666) $ (2,120,642) Financing Fees $ (500,000) $ (380,103) Total Expenditures $ (36,629,894) $ (28,725,745) Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with input from City of Tigard. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 19 VI. THE ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE FOR EACH PROJECT The projects will be ongoing and will be completed as directed by the TCDA. The Area is anticipated to complete all projects on or before FYE 2039 and have sufficient tax increment finance revenue to terminate the district in FYE 2049. Changes in market conditions could affect the assumed development schedule. However, the last day to incur debt, June 30, 2035, is to be set in the Plan and is part of the voter approval. Anticipated project completion dates are shown in Table 12. The TCDA may change the completion dates in their annual budgeting process or as project decisions are made in administering the urban renewal plan. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 20 Table 12- Projects and Costs in Year of Expenditure Dollars Resources Total FYE 2021 FYE 2022 FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026 FYE 2027 FYE 2028 FYE 2029 Beginning Balance 4,132,306 2,264,962 805,820 927,127 97,374 209,608 410,469 158,157 128,336 Interest Earnings 77,827 20,662 11,325 4,029 4,636 487 1,048 2,052 791 642 Transfer from Debt Service Fund 7,419,761 1,339,894 319,197 393,334 132,781 211,523 304,642 157,941 269,580 388,720 Bond/Loan Proceeds 25,000,000 - - - 5,800,000 - - 4,200,000 - - Total Resources 32,497,588 5,492,862 2,595,484 1,203,183 6,864,544 309,385 515,298 4,770,462 428,527 517,699 Expenditures(YOE$) Public Spaces (7,461,020) (1,591,000) (1,111,370) - - - - (4,418,170) - - Street Improvements (3,883,900) (1,100,000) (515,000) - - - - - - - Streetscape (1,087,820) (125,000) - - - - - - - - Ped/Bike Facilities (1,999,605) - - - - - - - (184,485) - Public Facilities (6,556,200) - - - (6,556,200) - - - - - Parks (1,739,490) - - - - - - - - - Affordable Housing Dev Assistance (2,880,720) - - - - - - - - - Planning and Dev.Assistance (1,852,693) (330,000) (77,250) (185,658) - - - - - (95,010) Property Acquisition (5,649,780) - - - - - - - - - Administration (3,018,666) (81,900) (86,044) (90,398) (94,970) (99,777) (104,829) (110,135) (115,706) (121,561) Financing Fees (500,000) - - - (116,000) - - (84,000) - - Total Expenditures (36,629,894) (3,227,900) (1,789,664) (276,056) (6,767,170) (99,777) (104,829) (4,612,305) (300,191) (216,571) Ending Balance 2,264,962 805,820 927,127 97,374 209,608 410,469 158,157 128,336 301,128 Ending Balance/Inflation Index 2,264,962 782,350 873,906 89,114 186,235 354,066 132,448 104,347 237,707 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC with input from City of Tigard. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 21 Table 12- Projects and Costs in Year of Expenditure Dollars, page 2 Resources FYE 2030 FYE 2031 FYE 2032 FYE 2033 FYE 2034 FYE 2035 FYE 2036 FYE 2037 FYE 2038 FYE 2039 Beginning Balance 301,128 205,019 520,471 382,117 235,942 397,155 589,986 872,134 225,222 159,402 Interest Earnings 1,506 1,025 2,602 1,911 1,180 1,986 2,950 4,361 1,126 797 Transfer from Debt Service Fund 320,176 448,596 - - 315,615 469,810 450,932 491,965 535,797 581,601 Bond/Loan Proceeds 2,500,000 - - - - 12,500,000 - - - - Total Resources 3,122,810 654,640 523,073 384,028 552,737 13,368,951 1,043,867 1,368,460 762,145 741,800 Expenditures(YOE$) Public Spaces - - - - - - - - - (340,480) Street Improvements - - - - - (2,268,900) - - - - Streetscape - - - - - - - (962,820) - - Ped/Bike Facilities - - - - - (1,815,120) - - - - Public Facilities - - - - - - - - - - Parks - - - - - (1,739,490) - - - - Affordable Housing Dev Assistance (652,400) - - - - (1,815,120) - - (413,200) - Planning and Dev.Assistance (521,920) - - - - (642,855) - - -Property Acquisition (1,565,760) - - - - (4,084,020) - - - - Administration (127,711) (134,169) (140,956) (148,086) (155,582) (163,460) (171,733) (180,418) (189,543) (199,135) Financing Fees (50,000) - - - - (250,000) - - - - Total Expenditures (2,917,791) (134,169) (140,956) (148,086) (155,582) (12,778,965) (171,733) (1,143,238) (602,743) (539,615) Ending Balance 205,019 520,471 382,117 235,942 397,155 589,986 872,134 225,222 159,402 202,185 Ending Balance/Inflation Index 157,126 387,284 276,056 165,492 270,449 390,048 559,778 140,352 96,444 118,765 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC with input from City of Tigard Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 22 .Table 12- Projects and Costs in Year of Expenditure Dollars, page 3 FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE Resources 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 Beginning Balance 202,185 447,015 404,097 359,609 313,504 265,732 216,241 164,977 111,887 56,913 Interest Earnings 1,011 2,235 2,020 1,798 1,568 1,329 1,081 825 559 285 Transfer from Debt Service Fund 287,657 - - - - - - - - - Bond/Loan Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - Total Resources 490,853 449,250 406,117 361,407 315,072 267,061 217,322 165,802 112,446 57,198 Expenditures(YOE$) Public Spaces - - - - - - - - - - Street Improvements - - - - - - - - - - Streetscape - - - - - - - - - - Ped/Bike Facilities - - - - - - - - - - Public Facilities - - - - - - - - - - Parks - - - - - - - - - - Affordable Housing Dev Assistance - - - - - - - - - - Planning and Dev.Assistance - - - - - - - - - - Property Acquisition - - - - - - - - - - Administration (43,838) (45,153) (46,508) (47,903) (49,340) (50,820) (52,345) (53,915) (55,533) (57,198) Financing Fees - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures (43,838) (45,153) (46,508) (47,903) (49,340) (50,820) (52,345) (53,915) (55,533) (57,198) Ending Balance 447,015 404,097 359,609 313,504 265,732 216,241 164,977 111,887 56,913 - Ending Balance/Inflation Index 254,927 223,740 193,307 163,616 134,643 106,376 78,793 51,881 25,621 - Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC with input from City of Tigard Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 23 VII THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUES REQUIRED AND THE ANTICIPATED YEAR IN WHICH INDEBTEDNESS WILL BE RETIRED Table 13 shows the allocation of tax increment revenues to debt service. Table 13 shows no new debt being incurred after FYE 2035, as required by the Plan. It is anticipated that the TCDA will have sufficient resources to retire all debt by FYE 2049, which would then allow the TCDA to cease collecting tax increment revenues and close down the Area. The time frame for retiring all debt for the Area is not absolute; it may vary depending on the actual terms of the indebtedness incurred and the actual tax increment revenues received. If the economy is slower, it may take longer to repay all debt; if the economy is more robust than the projections, it may take a shorter time period. The TCDA may decide to issue bonds or take on loans on a different schedule, and that will alter the financing assumptions, however the proposed Plan Amendment prohibits any new debt after FYE 2035. The maximum indebtedness of the Plan is $42,800,000 (Forty Two Million Eight Hundred Thousand dollars and no cents). The City of Tigard estimates that $10,375,574 of indebtedness has been incurred by the TCDA for the Area through the end of FYE 2020, resulting in $11,624,426 in remaining capacity from the original indebtedness for the Area. The capacity for projects, programs and administration starting in FYE 2021 is $36,629,894. The estimated amount of tax increment revenues necessary to service all debt is $52,469,918. This number is higher than the amount allocated to projects as it includes debt service payments (principal and interest) to pay for new debt and debt that was already incurred in the past, including projects that were already funded in prior fiscal years. Information on scheduled debt service payments for all existing debt was provided by the City of Tigard Finance Department. Additionally, we assume the TCDA will undertake four additional borrowings in future years to finance the costs of projects identified in the Plan. For speculative future borrowings, the amounts, timing, and terms of the debt are unknown. The assumptions used in this Report are for planning purposes only, and subject to change based on market conditions. These assumptions were developed by Tiberius Solutions LLC and informed by conversations with staff from the City of Tigard Finance Department and their financial advisor. Borrowing assumptions in later years (FYE 2030 and beyond) are more conservative than in earlier years (FYE 2021 through FYE 2029), to reflect greater financial uncertainty in later years. Specific key assumptions for the financial analysis include: • Debt Service Coverage Ratio: Payments for future indebtedness are structured so that annual tax increment revenues are projected to equal or exceed 1.1 x total annual debt service payments through FYE 2029. In FYE 2030 and thereafter, the projected minimum debt service coverage ratio increases to 1.25. • New Debt FYE 2024: Assumes principal amount of$5,800,000 with 4.0% interest rate, 30-year amortization period, level annual debt service payments, and no prepayment penalties. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 24 • New Debt FYE 2027: Assumes principal amount of$4,200,000 with 4.0% interest rate, 30-year amortization period, level annual debt service payments, and no prepayment penalties. • New Debt FYE 2030: Assumes principal amount of$2,500,000 with 4.5% interest rate, 20-year amortization period, level annual debt service payments, and no prepayment penalties. • New Debt FYE 2035: Assumes principal amount of$12,500,000 with 4.5% interest rate, 20-year amortization period, level annual debt service payments, and no prepayment penalties. For all of the assumed future borrowings, it is forecast that excess tax increment revenues in later years (FYE 2040 and beyond) would allow for additional principal payments, allowing for the loans to be repaid ahead of schedule. The assumptions used in this analysis present just one potential scenario for the long-term cash flow of the Area. If actual results differ from these assumptions, it could affect the ability of the TCDA to achieve these projects at these dollar amounts on this schedule. Based on these assumptions, we find the Amendment financially feasible. There is a positive fund balance shown in FYE 2932 and FYE 2033. In these years the Area's outstanding debt has a balloon payment scheduled in FYE 2034, so the Debt Service Fund needs to accumulative sufficient resources to be able to pay that oversized debt payment. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 25 Table 13-Tax Increment Revenues and Allocations to Debt Service Fund FYE Resources Total 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026 FYE 2027 FYE 2028 Beginning Balance - 1,085,936 - - - - - - - Interest Earnings 14,894 - 5,430 - - - - - - - TIF:Current Year 51,685,982 581,197 646,142 716,136 788,323 863,038 940,367 1,031,836 1,126,965 1,238,265 TIF:Prior Years 783,936 9,177 8,718 9,692 10,742 11,825 12,946 14,106 15,478 16,904 Total Resources 52,484,812 590,374 1,746,226 725,828 799,065 874,862 953,312 1,045,942 1,142,442 1,255,169 Expenditures New Debt FYE 2024 (6,764,129) - - - - (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) New Debt FYE 2027 (4,614,842) - - - - - - - (242,886) (242,886) New Debt FYE 2030 (3,267,236) - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2035 (13,527,860) - - - - - - - - - Series 2019A (2,332,883) - (124,746) (124,858) (124,922) (124,940) (124,910) (124,834) (124,710) (125,538) Series 2019B (5,226,787) - (281,587) (281,773) (280,809) (281,726) (281,464) (281,052) (281,491) (281,750) Early Principal Payment - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2024 (2,539,427) - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2027 (2,082,879) - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2030 (515,784) - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2035 (4,688,785) - - - - - - - - - Total Debt Service,Scheduled Only (35,733,738) - (406,332) (406,630) (405,732) (742,081) (741,789) (741,300) (984,501) (985,589) Total Debt Service (45,560,613) - (406,332) (406,630) (405,732) (742,081) (741,789) (741,300) (984,501) (985,589) Debt Service Coverage Ratio 1.59 1.76 1.94 1.16 1.27 1.39 1.14 1.26 Transfer to Capital Improvements Fund (7,419,761) - (1,339,894) (319,197) (393,334) (132,781) (211,523) (304,642) (157,941) (269,580) Total Expenditures (52,980,374) - (1,746,226) (725,828) (799,065) (874,862) (953,312) (1,045,942) (1,142,442) (1,255,169) Ending Balance - - - - - - - - Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 26 Table 13-Tax Increment Revenues and Allocations to Debt Service Fund, page 2 Resources FYE 2029 FYE 2030 FYE 2031 FYE 2032 FYE 2033 FYE 2034 FYE 2035 FYE 2036 FYE 2037 FYE 2038 Beginning Balance - - - - 583,071 1,309,840 - - - - Interest Earnings - - - - 2,915 6,549 - - - - TIF:Current Year 1,354,573 1,476,116 1,603,128 1,735,855 1,874,555 2,019,497 2,170,961 2,149,810 2,191,161 2,234,372 TIF:Prior Years 18,574 20,319 22,142 24,047 26,038 28,118 30,292 32,564 32,247 32,867 Total Resources 1,373,147 1,496,434 1,625,269 1,759,902 2,486,579 3,364,005 2,201,254 2,182,375 2,223,408 2,267,240 Expenditures New Debt FYE 2024 (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) New Debt FYE 2027 (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) New Debt FYE 2030 - (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) New Debt FYE 2035 - - - - - - (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) Series 2019A (125,296) (125,007) (124,671) (125,287) (124,833) (708,331) - - - - Series 2019B (280,830) (280,760) (281,511) (281,053) (281,415) (1,569,568) - - - - Early Principal Payment - - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2024 - - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2027 - - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2030 - - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2035 - - - - - - - - - - Total Debt Service,Scheduled Only (984,427) (1,176,259) (1,176,673) (1,176,831) (1,176,739) (3,048,390) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) Total Debt Service (984,427) (1,176,259) (1,176,673) (1,176,831) (1,176,739) (3,048,390) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) Debt Service Coverage Ratio 1.38 1.25 1.36 1.48 1.59 0.66 1.25 1.24 1.27 1.29 Transfer to Capital Improvements Fund (388,720) (320,176) (448,596) - - (315,615) (469,810) (450,932) (491,965) (535,797) I Total Expenditures (1,373,147) (1,496,434) (1,625,269) (1,176,831) (1,176,739) (3,364,005) (2,201,254) (2,182,375) (2,223,408) (2,267,240) I Ending Balance - - - 583,071 1,309,840 - - - - - Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 27 Table 13-Tax Increment Revenues and Allocations to Debt Service Fund, page 3 FYE Resources FYE 2039 FYE 2040 FYE 2041 FYE 2042 FYE 2043 FYE 2044 FYE 2045 FYE 2046 FYE 2047 FYE 2048 2049 Beginning Balance Interest Earnings TIF:Current Year 2,279,528 2,326,716 2,376,028 2,427,558 2,481,407 2,537,680 2,596,484 2,657,935 2,612,500 2,612,500 35,347 TIF:Prior Years 33,516 34,193 34,901 35,640 36,413 37,221 38,065 38,947 39,869 39,188 39,188 Total Resources 2,313,044 2,360,909 2,410,928 2,463,198 2,517,821 2,574,901 2,634,550 2,696,883 2,652,369 2,651,688 74,535 Expenditures New Debt FYE 2024 (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (55,838) - - - -New Debt FYE 2027 (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) - - -New Debt FYE 2030 (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) - -New Debt FYE 2035 (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (74,535) Series 2019A Series 2019B Early Principal Payment New Debt FYE 2024 - (341,809) (679,485) (731,755) (786,377) - - - - -New Debt FYE 2027 - - - - - (1,123,034) (959,845) - - -New Debt FYE 2030 - - - - - - (278,676) (237,108) - -New Debt FYE 2035 - - - - - - - (1,306,632) (1,691,417) (1,690,736) - Total Debt Service,Scheduled Only (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,451,867) (1,396,029) (1,153,142) (960,952) (960,952) (74,535) Total Debt Service (1,731,443) (2,073,252) (2,410,928) (2,463,198) (2,517,821) (2,574,901) (2,634,550) (2,696,883) (2,652,369) (2,651,688) (74,535) Debt Service Coverage Ratio 1.32 1.34 1.37 1.40 1.43 1.75 1.86 2.30 2.72 2.72 0.47 Transfer to URA Projects Fund (581,601) (287,657) - - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures (2,313,044) (2,360,909) (2,410,928) (2,463,198) (2,517,821) (2,574,901) (2,634,550) (2,696,883) (2,652,369) (2,651,688) (74,535) Ending Balance Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 28 VIII FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN The estimated tax increment revenues through FYE 2049 as shown above, are based on projections of the assessed value of development within the Area and the consolidated tax rate that will apply in the Area. The analysis assumes average annual growth in assessed value starting at 3.5% and increasing to 4.0% in FYE 2026 and 4.5% in FYE 2028. These growth rates assume both the appreciation of existing property values and new construction activity in the Area. Table 17 shows the projected incremental assessed value, tax rates, and tax increment revenues each year, adjusted for discounts, delinquencies, and compression losses. These projections of increment are the basis for the projections in Tables 12 and 13. Gross TIF is calculated by multiplying the tax rate times the excess value. The tax rate is stated per thousand dollars of assessed value, so the calculation is "tax rate times excess value divided by one thousand". The consolidated tax rate includes only permanent rate levies. Revenue sharing is part of the 2009 legislative changes to urban renewal and comes into effect when a substantial amendment to increase maximum indebtedness is approved. Revenue sharing means that, at thresholds defined in ORS 457.470, the impacted taxing jurisdictions will receive a share of the incremental growth in the District. The first threshold is 10%of the original maximum indebtedness ($2,200,000). At the 10%threshold, the Agency will receive the full 10%of the initial maximum indebtedness plus 25% of the increment above the 10% threshold and the taxing jurisdictions will receive 75% of the increment above the 10% threshold. Revenue sharing targets are projected to be reached in FYE 2036. If assessed value in the Area grows more quickly than projected, the revenue sharing triggers could be reached earlier. The second threshold is set at 12.5% of the maximum indebtedness ($2,750,000). If this threshold is met, revenue for the district would be capped at 12.5% of the maximum indebtedness, with all additional tax revenue being shared with affected taxing districts. This revenue sharing target is projected to be reached in FYE 2047. Projected Revenue Sharing is shown in Table 14 and specifically by taxing district in Table 15 and Table 16. The revenue sharing shown under the "shared-voluntary" column in FYE 2049 is not a result of meeting the revenue sharing triggers, but a result of reaching the maximum indebtedness the final year of the District, estimated in FYE 2049. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 29 Table 14 - Projected Revenue Sharing Gross TIF Shared - Shared - Final Gross FYE Mandatory Voluntary TIF for URA 2036 $188,874 $2,262,958 2037 $319,455 $2,306,485 2038 $455,912 $2,351,971 2039 $598,510 $2,399,503 2040 $747,525 $2,449,175 2041 $903,245 $2,501,082 2042 $1,065,972 $2,555,324 2043 $1,236,023 $2,612,008 2044 $1,413,725 $2,671,242 2045 $1,599,425 $2,733,142 2046 $1,793,480 $2,797,827 2047 $2,111,691 $2,750,000 2048 $2,394,243 $2,750,000 2049 $2,689,509 $2,712,792 $37,208 Total $17,517,592 $2,712,792 $33,177,924 Source:Tiberius So utions LLC Table 15 - Projected Revenue Sharing by Taxing District -General Government Tigard Washington Port of Tualatin Valley Tualatin County SWC Tualatin Metro Portland Fire&Rescue City of Tigard Aquatic Subtotal FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Gen.Govt. 2036 $35,215 $1,410 $1,513 $1,098 $23,888 $39,361 $1,410 $103,894 2037 $59,561 $2,384 $2,559 $1,857 $40,403 $66,574 $2,384 $175,723 2038 $85,003 $3,403 $3,652 $2,650 $57,662 $95,011 $3,403 $250,784 2039 $111,590 $4,467 $4,794 $3,479 $75,697 $124,728 $4,467 $329,222 2040 $139,374 $5,579 $5,988 $4,345 $94,544 $155,782 $5,579 $411,191 2041 $168,407 $6,741 $7,235 $5,251 $114,239 $188,233 $6,741 $496,848 2042 $198,747 $7,956 $8,539 $6,196 $134,820 $222,145 $7,956 $586,359 2043 $230,453 $9,225 $9,901 $7,185 $156,327 $257,583 $9,225 $679,899 2044 $263,585 $10,551 $11,325 $8,218 $178,802 $294,616 $10,551 $777,647 2045 $298,208 $11,937 $12,812 $9,297 $202,289 $333,315 $11,937 $879,795 2046 $334,389 $13,385 $14,367 $10,425 $226,832 $373,756 $13,385 $986,539 2047 $393,718 $15,760 $16,916 $12,275 $267,078 $440,070 $15,760 $1,161,577 2048 $446,399 $17,869 $19,179 $13,918 $302,814 $498,953 $17,869 $1,317,000 2049 $1,007,242 $40,318 $43,275 $31,404 $683,262 $1,125,823 $40,318 $2,971,642 Total $3,771,892 $150,983 $162,055 $117,599 $2,558,659 $4,215,949 $150,983 $11,128,120 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 30 Table 16 - Projected Revenue Sharing by Taxing District- Education Portland NW Tigard/Tualatin Community Regional SD College ESD Subtotal Total FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Education All 2036 $78,142 $4,429 $2,409 $84,980 $188,874 2037 $132,167 $7,492 $4,074 $143,733 $319,455 2038 $188,623 $10,692 $5,815 $205,129 $455,912 2039 $247,619 $14,036 $7,633 $269,288 $598,510 2040 $309,270 $17,530 $9,534 $336,334 $747,525 2041 $373,696 $21,182 $11,520 $406,397 $903,245 2042 $441,020 $24,998 $13,595 $479,613 $1,065,972 2043 $511,374 $28,986 $15,764 $556,124 $1,236,023 2044 $584,894 $33,153 $18,030 $636,078 $1,413,725 2045 $661,723 $37,508 $20,399 $719,630 $1,599,425 2046 $742,009 $42,059 $22,874 $806,941 $1,793,480 2047 $873,661 $49,521 $26,932 $950,114 $2,111,691 2048 $990,560 $56,147 $30,536 $1,077,243 $2,394,243 2049 $2,235,071 $126,689 $68,900 $2,430,659 $5,402,302 Total $8,369,828 $474,422 $258,013 $9,102,264 $20,230,384 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 31 Table 17- Projected Incremental Assessed Value, Tax Rates, and Tax Increment Revenues, page 1 Assessed Value Increment Tax Increment Finance Dollars Net Net Net FYE Total Frozen Base Used Unused Tax Rate Gross Adjustments (Current Year) (Prior Year) (Total) 2020 168,286,420 117,522,911 50,763,509 - 12.0517 611,787 (30,589) 581,197 9,177 590,374 2021 173,945,351 117,522,911 56,422,440 - 12.0546 680,150 (34,008) 646,142 8,718 654,860 2022 180,033,439 117,522,911 62,510,528 - 12.0592 753,827 (37,691) 716,136 9,692 725,828 2023 186,334,608 117,522,911 68,811,697 - 12.0592 829,814 (41,491) 788,323 10,742 799,065 2024 192,856,319 117,522,911 75,333,408 - 12.0592 908,461 (45,423) 863,038 11,825 874,862 2025 199,606,290 117,522,911 82,083,379 - 12.0592 989,860 (49,493) 940,367 12,946 953,312 2026 207,590,542 117,522,911 90,067,631 - 12.0592 1,086,144 (54,307) 1,031,836 14,106 1,045,942 2027 215,894,164 117,522,911 98,371,253 - 12.0592 1,186,279 (59,314) 1,126,965 15,478 1,142,442 2028 225,609,401 117,522,911 108,086,490 - 12.0592 1,303,437 (65,172) 1,238,265 16,904 1,255,169 2029 235,761,823 117,522,911 118,238,912 - 12.0592 1,425,867 (71,293) 1,354,573 18,574 1,373,147 2030 246,371,105 117,522,911 128,848,194 - 12.0592 1,553,806 (77,690) 1,476,116 20,319 1,496,434 2031 257,457,806 117,522,911 139,934,895 - 12.0592 1,687,503 (84,375) 1,603,128 22,142 1,625,269 2032 269,043,408 117,522,911 151,520,497 - 12.0592 1,827,216 (91,361) 1,735,855 24,047 1,759,902 2033 281,150,361 117,522,911 163,627,450 - 12.0592 1,973,216 (98,661) 1,874,555 26,038 1,900,593 2034 293,802,127 117,522,911 176,279,216 - 12.0592 2,125,786 (106,289) 2,019,497 28,118 2,047,615 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Notes:TIF is tax increment revenues Tax rates are expressed in terms of dollars per$1,000 of assessed value. Changes in total tax rates are due to increasing the Tualatin SWC rate to.0900 in FYE 2022 Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 32 Table 18— Projected Incremental Assessed Value, Tax Rates, and Tax Increment Revenues, page 2 Assessed Value Increment Tax Increment Finance Dollars Net Net Net FYE Total Frozen Base Used Unused Tax Rate Gross Adjustments (Current Year) (Prior Year) (Total) 2035 307,023,223 117,522,911 189,500,312 - 12.0592 2,285,222 (114,261) 2,170,961 30,292 2,201,254 2036 320,839,268 117,522,911 187,654,086 15,662,271 12.0592 2,262,958 (113,148) 2,149,810 32,564 2,182,375 2037 335,277,036 117,522,911 191,263,528 26,490,597 12.0592 2,306,485 (115,324) 2,191,161 32,247 2,223,408 2038 350,364,503 117,522,911 195,035,395 37,806,197 12.0592 2,351,971 (117,599) 2,234,372 32,867 2,267,240 2039 366,130,904 117,522,911 198,976,995 49,630,998 12.0592 2,399,503 (119,975) 2,279,528 33,516 2,313,044 2040 382,606,796 117,522,911 203,095,968 61,987,917 12.0592 2,449,175 (122,459) 2,326,716 34,193 2,360,909 2041 399,824,100 117,522,911 207,400,294 74,900,895 12.0592 2,501,082 (125,054) 2,376,028 34,901 2,410,928 2042 417,816,183 117,522,911 211,898,315 88,394,957 12.0592 2,555,324 (127,766) 2,427,558 35,640 2,463,198 2043 436,617,910 117,522,911 216,598,746 102,496,253 12.0592 2,612,008 (130,600) 2,481,407 36,413 2,517,821 2044 456,265,717 117,522,911 221,510,698 117,232,108 12.0592 2,671,242 (133,562) 2,537,680 37,221 2,574,901 2045 476,797,674 117,522,911 226,643,687 132,631,076 12.0592 2,733,142 (136,657) 2,596,484 38,065 2,634,550 2046 498,253,569 117,522,911 232,007,661 148,722,997 12.0592 2,797,827 (139,891) 2,657,935 38,947 2,696,883 2047 520,674,979 117,522,911 228,041,661 175,110,407 12.0592 2,750,000 (137,500) 2,612,500 39,869 2,652,369 2048 544,105,353 117,522,911 228,041,661 198,540,781 12.0592 2,750,000 (137,500) 2,612,500 39,188 2,651,688 2049 568,590,094 117,522,911 3,085,422 447,981,761 12.0592 37,208 (1,860) 35,347 39,188 74,535 Total 54,406,297 (2,720,315) 51,685,982 783,936 52,469,918 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Notes:TIF is tax increment revenues Tax rates are expressed in terms of dollars per$1,000 of assessed value. Changes in total tax rates are due to increasing the Tualatin SWC rate to.0900 in FYE 2022 Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 33 IX. IMPACT OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING This section describes the impact of tax increment financing of the Amendment (increased maximum indebtedness), both until and after the indebtedness is repaid, upon all entities levying taxes upon property in the urban renewal area. The impact of tax increment financing on overlapping taxing districts consists of the property tax revenues foregone on permanent rate levies as applied to the growth in assessed value in the Area. The projections for impacts on due to the increase in maximum indebtedness in this Amendment and are shown in Tables 19a and 19b. The impact of the Amendment on overlapping taxing districts is measured by the increase in annual tax increment revenues that would be foregone by those districts until all debt is repaid on the increased maximum indebtedness of$20,800,000. The estimated impacts of the original maximum indebtedness prior to this Amendment are shown in Tables 19c and 19d. These show incurring the full amount of original maximum indebtedness of$22 million in the original time frame of FYE 2026 and paying off all debt by FYE 2036. The estimated impacts for the full (original plus the increased) maximum indebtedness from this Amendment are shown in Tables 19e and 19f. All debt is incurred by FYE 2035 and paid off by FYE 2049. The Tigard Tualatin School District and the Northwest Regional Education Service District are not directly affected by the tax increment financing, but the amounts of their taxes divided for the urban renewal plan are shown in the following tables. Under current school funding law, property tax revenues are combined with State School Fund revenues to achieve per-student funding targets. Under this system, property taxes foregone, due to the use of tax increment financing, are substantially replaced with State School Fund revenues, as determined by a funding formula at the State level. General obligation bonds will not be impacted by this Amendment, because only bonds approved by voters prior to October 6, 2001 are affected by this Plan, and there are none remaining. Local option levies are not impacted by this Amendment. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 34 Table 19a - Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Increased MI - General Government Soil/Water Tualatin Tigard Washington Conservation Port of Valley Fire City of Tualatin County Tualatin Metro Portland &Rescue Tigard Aquatic Subtotal FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Gen.Govt. 2036 ($58,613) ($2,346) ($2,518) ($1,827) ($39,760) ($65,514) ($2,346) ($172,925) 2037 ($414,547) ($16,594) ($17,811) ($12,925) ($281,208) ($463,351) ($16,594) ($1,223,029) 2038 ($422,720) ($16,921) ($18,162) ($13,179) ($286,752) ($472,486) ($16,921) ($1,247,140) 2039 ($431,260) ($17,263) ($18,529) ($13,446) ($292,545) ($482,031) ($17,263) ($1,272,335) 2040 ($440,184) ($17,620) ($18,912) ($13,724) ($298,598) ($492,006) ($17,620) ($1,298,664) 2041 ($449,510) ($17,993) ($19,313) ($14,015) ($304,925) ($502,430) ($17,993) ($1,326,178) 2042 ($459,256) ($18,383) ($19,731) ($14,319) ($311,536) ($513,323) ($18,383) ($1,354,931) 2043 ($469,440) ($18,791) ($20,169) ($14,636) ($318,444) ($524,706) ($18,791) ($1,384,977) 2044 ($480,082) ($19,217) ($20,626) ($14,968) ($325,663) ($536,601) ($19,217) ($1,416,375) 2045 ($491,204) ($19,662) ($21,104) ($15,315) ($333,207) ($549,032) ($19,662) ($1,449,186) 2046 ($502,825) ($20,127) ($21,603) ($15,677) ($341,091) ($562,022) ($20,127) ($1,483,473) 2047 ($494,526) ($19,795) ($21,247) ($15,418) ($335,461) ($552,746) ($19,795) ($1,458,988) 2048 ($494,399) ($19,790) ($21,241) ($15,414) ($335,375) ($552,603) ($19,790) ($1,458,613) 2049 ($13,897) ($556) ($597) ($433) ($9,427) ($15,533) ($556) ($40,999) Total ($5,622,462) ($225,059) ($241,563) ($175,296) ($3,813,992) ($6,284,384) ($225,059) ($16,587,814) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 35 Table 19b- Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Increased MI - Education NW Regional Portland Education Tigard/Tualatin Community Service School District College District Subtotal Total FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Education All 2036 ($130,063) ($7,372) ($4,009) ($141,444) ($314,369) 2037 ($919,881) ($52,141) ($28,357) ($1,000,379) ($2,223,408) 2038 ($938,015) ($53,169) ($28,916) ($1,020,100) ($2,267,240) 2039 ($956,965) ($54,243) ($29,500) ($1,040,709) ($2,313,044) 2040 ($976,769) ($55,366) ($30,110) ($1,062,245) ($2,360,909) 2041 ($997,463) ($56,539) ($30,748) ($1,084,750) ($2,410,928) 2042 ($1,019,088) ($57,764) ($31,415) ($1,108,268) ($2,463,198) 2043 ($1,041,687) ($59,045) ($32,112) ($1,132,844) ($2,517,821) 2044 ($1,065,302) ($60,384) ($32,840) ($1,158,526) ($2,574,901) 2045 ($1,089,981) ($61,783) ($33,600) ($1,185,364) ($2,634,550) 2046 ($1,115,769) ($63,245) ($34,395) ($1,213,409) ($2,696,883) 2047 ($1,097,353) ($62,201) ($33,828) ($1,193,381) ($2,652,369) 2048 ($1,097,071) ($62,185) ($33,819) ($1,193,075) ($2,651,688) 2049 ($30,837) ($1,748) ($951) ($33,535) ($74,535) Total ($12,476,244) ($707,184) ($384,600) ($13,568,028) ($30,155,842) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC.Please refer to the explanation of the schools funding in the preceding section Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 36 Table 19c- Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Original MI - General Government Soil/Water Tualatin Tigard Washington Conservation Port of Valley Fire City of Tualatin County Tualatin Metro Portland &Rescue Tigard Aquatic Subtotal FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Gen.Govt. 2020 ($110,142) ($4,041) ($4,732) ($3,434) ($74,715) ($123,109) ($4,409) ($324,582) 2021 ($122,143) ($4,639) ($5,248) ($3,808) ($82,856) ($136,523) ($4,889) ($360,106) 2022 ($135,328) ($5,417) ($5,814) ($4,219) ($91,800) ($151,260) ($5,417) ($399,256) 2023 ($148,983) ($5,964) ($6,401) ($4,645) ($101,063) ($166,523) ($5,964) ($439,542) 2024 ($163,115) ($6,529) ($7,008) ($5,086) ($110,649) ($182,319) ($6,529) ($481,235) 2025 ($177,742) ($7,115) ($7,636) ($5,542) ($120,571) ($198,667) ($7,115) ($524,388) 2026 ($195,013) ($7,806) ($8,379) ($6,080) ($132,287) ($217,971) ($7,806) ($575,341) 2027 ($213,005) ($8,526) ($9,152) ($6,641) ($144,492) ($238,081) ($8,526) ($628,423) 2028 ($234,022) ($9,368) ($10,055) ($7,296) ($158,749) ($261,573) ($9,368) ($690,430) 2029 ($256,019) ($10,248) ($11,000) ($7,982) ($173,670) ($286,160) ($10,248) ($755,327) 2030 ($279,006) ($11,168) ($11,987) ($8,699) ($189,263) ($311,852) ($11,168) ($823,143) 2031 ($303,026) ($12,130) ($13,019) ($9,448) ($205,558) ($338,701) ($12,130) ($894,011) 2032 ($328,128) ($13,134) ($14,098) ($10,230) ($222,585) ($366,758) ($13,134) ($968,069) 2033 ($354,360) ($14,184) ($15,225) ($11,048) ($240,380) ($396,078) ($14,184) ($1,045,459) 2034 ($381,771) ($15,282) ($16,402) ($11,903) ($258,974) ($426,717) ($15,282) ($1,126,331) 2035 ($410,417) ($16,428) ($17,633) ($12,796) ($278,406) ($458,734) ($16,428) ($1,210,843) 2036 ($348,284) ($13,941) ($14,964) ($10,859) ($236,258) ($389,287) ($13,941) ($1,027,533) Total ($4,160,505) ($165,921) ($178,751) ($129,715) ($2,822,274) ($4,650,313) ($166,539) ($12,274,019) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 37 Table 19d - Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Original MI - Education NW Regional Portland Education Tigard/Tualatin Community Service School District College District Subtotal Total FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Education All 2020 ($244,405) ($13,853) ($7,534) ($265,793) ($590,374) 2021 ($271,036) ($15,363) ($8,355) ($294,754) ($654,860) 2022 ($300,294) ($17,021) ($9,257) ($326,572) ($725,828) 2023 ($330,594) ($18,739) ($10,191) ($359,524) ($799,065) 2024 ($361,953) ($20,516) ($11,158) ($393,627) ($874,862) 2025 ($394,410) ($22,356) ($12,158) ($428,924) ($953,312) 2026 ($432,733) ($24,528) ($13,340) ($470,601) ($1,045,942) 2027 ($472,658) ($26,791) ($14,570) ($514,019) ($1,142,442) 2028 ($519,296) ($29,435) ($16,008) ($564,739) ($1,255,169) 2029 ($568,106) ($32,202) ($17,513) ($617,821) ($1,373,147) 2030 ($619,113) ($35,093) ($19,085) ($673,291) ($1,496,434) 2031 ($672,416) ($38,114) ($20,728) ($731,258) ($1,625,269) 2032 ($728,117) ($41,271) ($22,445) ($791,833) ($1,759,902) 2033 ($786,324) ($44,571) ($24,240) ($855,135) ($1,900,593) 2034 ($847,151) ($48,019) ($26,115) ($921,284) ($2,047,615) 2035 ($910,715) ($51,622) ($28,074) ($990,411) ($2,201,254) 2036 ($772,842) ($43,807) ($23,824) ($840,472) ($1,868,005) Total ($9,232,161) ($523,301) ($284,596) ($10,040,058) ($22,314,077) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC.Please refer to the explanation of the schools funding in the preceding section Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 38 Table 19e- Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Full Impact (Original and Increased) MI -General Government Soil/Water Tualatin Tigard Washington Conservation Port of Valley Fire Tualatin County Tualatin Metro Portland &Rescue City of Tigard Aquatic Subtotal FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Gen.Govt. 2020 ($110,142) ($4,041) ($4,732) ($3,434) ($74,715) ($123,109) ($4,409) ($324,582) 2021 ($122,143) ($4,639) ($5,248) ($3,808) ($82,856) ($136,523) ($4,889) ($360,106) 2022 ($135,328) ($5,417) ($5,814) ($4,219) ($91,800) ($151,260) ($5,417) ($399,256) 2023 ($148,983) ($5,964) ($6,401) ($4,645) ($101,063) ($166,523) ($5,964) ($439,542) 2024 ($163,115) ($6,529) ($7,008) ($5,086) ($110,649) ($182,319) ($6,529) ($481,235) 2025 ($177,742) ($7,115) ($7,636) ($5,542) ($120,571) ($198,667) ($7,115) ($524,388) 2026 ($195,013) ($7,806) ($8,379) ($6,080) ($132,287) ($217,971) ($7,806) ($575,341) 2027 ($213,005) ($8,526) ($9,152) ($6,641) ($144,492) ($238,081) ($8,526) ($628,423) 2028 ($234,022) ($9,368) ($10,055) ($7,296) ($158,749) ($261,573) ($9,368) ($690,430) 2029 ($256,019) ($10,248) ($11,000) ($7,982) ($173,670) ($286,160) ($10,248) ($755,327) 2030 ($279,006) ($11,168) ($11,987) ($8,699) ($189,263) ($311,852) ($11,168) ($823,143) 2031 ($303,026) ($12,130) ($13,019) ($9,448) ($205,558) ($338,701) ($12,130) ($894,011) 2032 ($328,128) ($13,134) ($14,098) ($10,230) ($222,585) ($366,758) ($13,134) ($968,069) 2033 ($354,360) ($14,184) ($15,225) ($11,048) ($240,380) ($396,078) ($14,184) ($1,045,459) 2034 ($381,771) ($15,282) ($16,402) ($11,903) ($258,974) ($426,717) ($15,282) ($1,126,331) 2035 ($410,417) ($16,428) ($17,633) ($12,796) ($278,406) ($458,734) ($16,428) ($1,210,843) 2036 ($406,897) ($16,287) ($17,482) ($12,686) ($276,018) ($454,800) ($16,287) ($1,200,458) 2037 ($414,547) ($16,594) ($17,811) ($12,925) ($281,208) ($463,351) ($16,594) ($1,223,029) 2038 ($422,720) ($16,921) ($18,162) ($13,179) ($286,752) ($472,486) ($16,921) ($1,247,140) 2039 ($431,260) ($17,263) ($18,529) ($13,446) ($292,545) ($482,031) ($17,263) ($1,272,335) 2040 ($440,184) ($17,620) ($18,912) ($13,724) ($298,598) ($492,006) ($17,620) ($1,298,664) 2041 ($449,510) ($17,993) ($19,313) ($14,015) ($304,925) ($502,430) ($17,993) ($1,326,178) 2042 ($459,256) ($18,383) ($19,731) ($14,319) ($311,536) ($513,323) ($18,383) ($1,354,931) 2043 ($469,440) ($18,791) ($20,169) ($14,636) ($318,444) ($524,706) ($18,791) ($1,384,977) 2044 ($480,082) ($19,217) ($20,626) ($14,968) ($325,663) ($536,601) ($19,217) ($1,416,375) 2045 ($491,204) ($19,662) ($21,104) ($15,315) ($333,207) ($549,032) ($19,662) ($1,449,186) 2046 ($502,825) ($20,127) ($21,603) ($15,677) ($341,091) ($562,022) ($20,127) ($1,483,473) 2047 ($494,526) ($19,795) ($21,247) ($15,418) ($335,461) ($552,746) ($19,795) ($1,458,988) 2048 ($494,399) ($19,790) ($21,241) ($15,414) ($335,375) ($552,603) ($19,790) ($1,458,613) 2049 ($13,897) ($556) ($597) ($433) ($9,427) ($15,533) ($556) ($40,999) Total ($9,782,967) ($390,980) ($420,314) ($305,011) ($6,636,266) ($10,934,697) ($391,597) ($28,861,832) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 39 Table 19f- Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Full MI (Original and Increased)- Education NW Regional Portland Education Tigard/Tualatin Community Service School District College District Subtotal Total FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Education All 2020 ($244,405) ($13,853) ($7,534) ($265,793) ($590,374) 2021 ($271,036) ($15,363) ($8,355) ($294,754) ($654,860) 2022 ($300,294) ($17,021) ($9,257) ($326,572) ($725,828) 2023 ($330,594) ($18,739) ($10,191) ($359,524) ($799,065) 2024 ($361,953) ($20,516) ($11,158) ($393,627) ($874,862) 2025 ($394,410) ($22,356) ($12,158) ($428,924) ($953,312) 2026 ($432,733) ($24,528) ($13,340) ($470,601) ($1,045,942) 2027 ($472,658) ($26,791) ($14,570) ($514,019) ($1,142,442) 2028 ($519,296) ($29,435) ($16,008) ($564,739) ($1,255,169) 2029 ($568,106) ($32,202) ($17,513) ($617,821) ($1,373,147) 2030 ($619,113) ($35,093) ($19,085) ($673,291) ($1,496,434) 2031 ($672,416) ($38,114) ($20,728) ($731,258) ($1,625,269) 2032 ($728,117) ($41,271) ($22,445) ($791,833) ($1,759,902) 2033 ($786,324) ($44,571) ($24,240) ($855,135) ($1,900,593) 2034 ($847,151) ($48,019) ($26,115) ($921,284) ($2,047,615) 2035 ($910,715) ($51,622) ($28,074) ($990,411) ($2,201,254) 2036 ($902,904) ($51,179) ($27,833) ($981,917) ($2,182,375) 2037 ($919,881) ($52,141) ($28,357) ($1,000,379) ($2,223,408) 2038 ($938,015) ($53,169) ($28,916) ($1,020,100) ($2,267,240) 2039 ($956,965) ($54,243) ($29,500) ($1,040,709) ($2,313,044) 2040 ($976,769) ($55,366) ($30,110) ($1,062,245) ($2,360,909) 2041 ($997,463) ($56,539) ($30,748) ($1,084,750) ($2,410,928) 2042 ($1,019,088) ($57,764) ($31,415) ($1,108,268) ($2,463,198) 2043 ($1,041,687) ($59,045) ($32,112) ($1,132,844) ($2,517,821) 2044 ($1,065,302) ($60,384) ($32,840) ($1,158,526) ($2,574,901) 2045 ($1,089,981) ($61,783) ($33,600) ($1,185,364) ($2,634,550) 2046 ($1,115,769) ($63,245) ($34,395) ($1,213,409) ($2,696,883) 2047 ($1,097,353) ($62,201) ($33,828) ($1,193,381) ($2,652,369) 2048 ($1,097,071) ($62,185) ($33,819) ($1,193,075) ($2,651,688) 2049 ($30,837) ($1,748) ($951) ($33,535) ($74,535) Total ($21,708,405) ($1,230,485) ($669,196) ($23,608,086) ($52,469,918) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC.Please refer to the explanation of the schools funding in the preceding section Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 40 Table 20 shows the projected increased revenue to the taxing jurisdictions after tax increment proceeds are projected to be terminated. These projections are for FYE 2050. Table 20—Additional Revenues Obtained after Termination of Tax Increment Financing Tax Revenue in FYE 2050(year after termination) Tax From Frozen From Excess Taxing District Rate Base Value Total General Government Washington County 2.2484 $264,239 $1,071,708 $1,335,947 Soil and Water Conservation Tualatin 0.0900 $10,577 $42,899 $53,476 Metro 0.0966 $11,353 $46,044 $57,397 Port of Portland 0.0701 $8,239 $33,413 $41,652 Tualatin Valley Fire& Rescue 1.5252 $179,246 $726,993 $906,239 City of Tigard 2.5131 $295,347 $1,197,879 $1,493,226 Tigard Tualatin Aquatic 0.0900 $10,577 $42,899 $53,476 Subtotal 6.6334 $779,578 $3,161,835 $3,941,413 Education Tigard/Tualatin School District 4.9892 $586,345 $2,378,121 $2,964,466 Portland Community College 0.2828 $33,236 $134,798 $168,034 NW Regional Education Service District 0.1538 $18,075 $73,309 $91,384 Subtotal 5.4258 $637,656 $2,586,228 $3,223,884 Total 12.0592 $1,417,234 $5,748,063 $7,165,297 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 41 X. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY LIMITS ON ASSESSED VALUE AND SIZE OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA State law limits the percentage of both a municipality's total assessed value and the total land area that can be contained in an urban renewal area at the time of its establishment to 15%for municipalities having a population of more than 50,000 according to the latest state census. Tigard's population eclipsed the 50,000 mark in 2019 as shown by the Portland State University Annual Population Report Tables. As noted below, the frozen base, including all real, personal, personal, manufactured, and utility properties in the Area, is $117,522,911. The total assessed value of the City of Tigard, minus excess value of the existing urban renewal areas is $6,954,974,807. Excess value is the assessed value created above the frozen base in the urban renewal area. The total urban renewal assessed value is 7.8% of the total assessed value of the City, minus excess value. This is below the 15% statutory limitation. The Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area contains 228.96 acres, including right-of-way, and the City of Tigard contains 8,129 acres. After accounting for the acreage in the potential Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area, 9.56% of the City's acreage would be in an urban renewal area. This is below the 15% statutory limitation. Table 21— Urban Renewal Area Conformance with Assessed Value and Acreage Limits Assessed Value UR Excess Acreage City of Tigard $7,046,400,810 8,129 City of Tigard minus UR excess $6,954,974,807 Tigard City Center $117,522,911 $50,763,509 228.96 Tigard Triangle $424,744,405 $40,662,494 547.90 City Center Plus Tigard Triangle $542,267,316 $91,426,003 776.86 Percentage in Urban Renewal 7.8% 9.56% Source:Compiled by Elaine Howard Consulting,LLC with data from City of Tigard and Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2020) XL RELOCATION REPORT There is no relocation report required for the Plan. No specific acquisitions that would result in relocation benefits have been identified, however, there are plans to acquire land for infrastructure which may trigger relocation benefits in the future in the Area. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 42 Exhibit C CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes,January 4, 2021 Location: Members Remote via Microsoft Teams Link to virtual hearing online: httrs://boxcast.ty/channeliovin vrarvxolrw6bwbss Call-in number for public testimony: 503-966-4101 Public testimony call-in time was between 7:15 and 7:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Acting President Hu called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Acting President Hu Commissioner Brook Alt. Commissioner Dick Commissioner Jackson Alt. Commissioner Miranda Commissioner Quinones Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Schuck Commissioner (K7) Tiruvallur Commissioner Watson Commissioner Whitehurst Absent: None Staff Present: Tom McGuire, Assistant Community Development Director; Doreen Laughlin, Executive Assistant; Sean Farrelly, Redevelopment Manager, Kenny Asher, Community Development Director, Nadine Robinson, Central Services Director Acting President Hu introduced and welcomed new Commissioner Craig Schuck,Alternate Commissioners Ahsha Miranda and Darlene Dick. He noted that Commissioner Schuck had served as an Alternate Commissioner the previous year, and that he was appointed to be a voting member in December of 2020. Commissioner Hu reminded the alternates that even though they are non-voting members, their comments and questions are just as valid any of the other commissioners. He encouraged them to speak up whenever the time arises. COMMUNICATIONS —Commissioner Jackson shared that he had attended the River Terrace 2.0 CAC when they met on Dec. 9 and gave a brief rundown of what they'd talked about. He shared with the commissioners a few of the statistics that he thought were a bit surprising. He noted that Tigard's vacancy rate is 1/3 of the Oregon vacancy rate — so there's January 4, 2021 Page 1 of 5 very little housing vacancy in Tigard. Another surprising statistic is that Tigard's home values are high compared to the state and even high compared to Portland. Also —for households making $55,000 a year or less —4/5's of those households are "housing cost burdened." Commissioner Watson noted that on Dec 16 she'd attended the Washington Square Regional Center Stakeholders meeting. She noted among other things that they had reviewed a number of ideas about the importance of making connections through the area that are pedestrian friendly. CONSIDER MINUTES Acting President Hu asked if there were any additions, deletions, or corrections to the December 7, 2020 minutes; there being none, Acting President Hu declared the minutes approved as submitted. PUBLIC HEARING 7:05 p.m. CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Substantial amendment proposes an increase in Maximum Indebtedness (MI). MI is the total amount of funds that may be spent on programs, projects and administration over the life of an Urban Renewal Area (URA). MI does not include interest paid on debt. The original and current MI for the Tigard URA is $22 million. The City proposes to increase the MI by $20.8 million, bringing the total MI to $42.8 million. HEARING STATEMENTS Acting President Hu read the required statements and procedural items from the hearing guide. There were no abstentions; there were no challenges of the commissioners for bias or conflict of interest. Ex-parte contacts: None. Site visitations: All of the commissioners had visited the City Center site. STAFF REPORT/APPLICANT PRESENTATION Redevelopment Project Manager Sean Farrelly introduced himself. Sean is city staff and represents the City as the applicant. He introduced Elaine Howard who is a city consultant and urban renewal expert in Oregon. Sean went over a PowerPoint (Exhibit A). He noted that the Urban Renewal Plan has been in place since 2006 in Tigard and there was a substantial amendment in 2017 that added some acreage. They're requesting to increase the maximum indebtedness of the area by $20.8 million — and that will allow us to do additional projects. The total maximum indebtedness would then be $42.8 million. The new debt can be issued until 2036. At this point, he turned the presentation over to Elaine Howard who gave a "Crash Course" in how Urban Renewal works. (Exhibit A). She gave a primer of sorts regarding Tax increment financing. Sean then talked about some of the specific successes that had been had in the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal District since 2006. He spoke about additional projects that had been completed, as well as current active projects - and how the plan relates to the City's Comprehensive Plan. He noted that it is consistent with the Transportation Plan, Tigard Parks System Master Plan, Affordable Housing Plan, and the Tigard Strategic Plan 2020-2025. January 4, 2021 Page 2 of 5 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Tigard Planning Commission finds, based upon the information provided in the staff report and the provided attachments, that the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment conforms with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and that the Tigard City Council adopt the proposed Plan Amendment. QUESTIONS / COMMENTS The commissioners agreed that the presentation very interesting, and that they appreciated it. Some questions were asked about the public parking garage and whether that would be owned by the City of Tigard. One commissioner found it interesting to learn how the funds flow. The suggestion was made that since the average person has no idea how this operates, this might be a good opportunity to educate people with perhaps an article in the City newsletter, or Tigard Times, or something similar. Sean replied that they're planning more education —including a short video. He told them to look for that to come out shortly. Another commissioner asked if the specific ideas and proposed projects noted were the true plan - or a commitment to do them. Sean answered that it's a list of projects —their intention is to do as many of them as they can within the available funds. He noted that some of the projects are done not just with tax increment financing, but some are done with grants. He noted that Tigard has already been successful getting grants to help kick start some of the projects. One of the commissioners noted that when he'd gone on the City website to look at the current project on the City Center Urban Renewal Plan, that there were a few broken links. He thinks other residents may want to go to that site to look at what's going on, and hopes the broken links are fixed. Sean said he would check into that and that it might be time to refresh those websites and to fix those broken links. PUBLIC TESTIMONY Acting President Hu asked if there was anyone on the line waiting to testify —there was none. TESTIMONY IN FAVOR —None TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION —None PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED DELIBERATION Acting President Hu asked that each of the commissioners give their thoughts on this. Following are some of the comments: • Commissioner Roberts thinks it's great. The connectivity improvement will help a lot, and he likes that. • Alt. Commissioner Dick concurs, and mentioned that she is hoping lights will be added to the Heritage Trail going to downtown as this moves forward. • Alt. Commissioner Miranda thinks it looks good. She likes parking structures and will have lots of questions and ideas on that in the future. • Commissioner Ii7 thinks it's a good thing. He believes it should have been done even sooner and believes this should move forward in this vibrant community. January 4, 2021 Page 3 of 5 • Commissioner Brook thinks it's a great plan. She still has questions about the parking and hopes there will be enough. Overall, she thinks it's a well thought out plan. • Commissioner Jackson said his thoughts are generally in alignment with the others so far as this conforming. His concerns are on the side of how does this link into other projects in the area —is that going to affect cost? Overall, he thinks it's very exciting. • Commissioner Quinones is excited for the Universal Plaza. She lives behind Fanno Creek Trail and the Burnham street access. She misses having the Farmers Market there and overall, is very excited about this project. • Commissioner Schuck likes the project. He thinks it's a good idea for that area — especially for some of the open spaces. The whole idea of tax increment financing is new to him. He'd been skeptical about how that works - so it was nice to hear how the public/private partnership can work to benefit both. He's in support of this. • Commissioner Watson finds it to be conforming in its intent. • Commissioner Whitehurst is also excited about the plan. He especially appreciates seeing the affordable housing piece. • Acting President Hu likes the plan. He's excited with the new projects in the downtown area and believes overall it conforms to the local goals. He just wishes the document would broadcast the energy conservation goals and aspirations a bit better. These types of things should be mentioned in the document. Overall, it's a great amendment and he supports it. MOTION Commissioner Watson made the following motion: "Based upon the information provided in the staff report and the provided attachments, I move that the Tigard Planning Commission find that Amendment No. 9 to the Urban Renewal Plan conforms to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and further recommend that the Tigard City Council adopt the proposed Plan Amendment." The motion was seconded by Commissioner Roberts. VOTE All in favor, none opposed. RESULT Motion for recommended approval CARRIES 9 - 0. City Council will have this hearing on February 9. There will be a postcard in the mail and more information on the Tigard Website, Facebook pages, and Twitter. BRIEFING — City Facilities Consolidation (CFC) Project Kenny Asher introduced himself as the Community Development Director who will be making the presentation along with Nadine Robinson (Central Services Director) and Kirsten Hauge (consultant from Kearns West). Kenny told the group they're happy to make this presentation to the commission. They will be asking Council to continue to the third and final feasibility stage in a couple of weeks. He noted they're in the process now of sharing what they've learned and what they want to do as city staff. January 4, 2021 Page 4 of 5 All three presenters spoke using this PowerPoint (Exhibit B). Kirsten Hauge went over the agenda and had a short question and answer time. Nadine Robinson introduced the talk saying that this is a necessary, cost-effective solution to meet Tigard's needs now and into the future. She went over the project description and timeline —including the three different phases. She explained why they believe it's necessary (basically because the City buildings need repair to maintain safe operations.) She noted that extensive, expensive repairs are needed such as the HVAC system, sewer connections, and roof of the police department building. She said most importantly the facilities do not meet current seismic standards that will ensure the city can maintain operations and respond should there be a seismic event. She went over the project description, timeline and funding and noted they are currently in Phase 2. At this point, Kenny Asher spoke about the potential opportunities. These facilities are over 30 years old. \Ve're out of space —especially in the Police Department. He talked about how this would improve downtown Tigard. Changing the city footprint will help with a number of things —particularly existing city properties could be redeveloped into more than 500 new apartments and expanded affordable housing options. New housing would stimulate downtown development which could lead to more shopping, dining, and housing. This could also increase walkability. He went over the community benefits such as a community room that will be available to reserve for civic meetings and events; a new parking structure that would provide additional parking for downtown visitors; and an opportunity to create new tax revenues from downtown development. He went over the long-term benefits, next steps, and upcoming activities. He ended his presentation talking about community engagement and what activities had taken place already to get the word out. OTHER BUSINESS —Election for President and Vice President of the Commission The offices of President and Vice President carry two-year terms and according to the commission by-laws, at the beginning of every odd year elections are held. The Commissioners voted to elect former Vice President Yi-Kang Hu for President, and Commissioner Nathan Jackson for Vice President. ADJOURNMENT President Hu adjourned the meeting at 9:00 p.m. Doreen Laughlin, P anninommission Secretary ATTT: Presidenti-Kang Hu January 4, 2021 Page 5 of 5 �' ' r �' �� r �' s �' r 'k t 5�' t �- ._,!t f WhatTis rthe� SRole Tther� Planning ` + �` t ,v= of t a � �, �a� ar 'k Commission ? • ORS 457 requires review by the Planning Commission • ORS 457 also requires the City Council find the Urban Renewal Plan in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan • Review, discuss, & ask questions • Consider finding that the Plan Amendment conforms to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and recommend the Plan's adoption to the Tigard City Council -n�. t at st t 3't t 3' at s s s s s s s s '? s ' s r s r s' r S 4 s � s r X r s r s r s � • " 'Y '.. 'k -k k 'k k k -k k k k k -k 2'.,:,''",,,-:. 2'e:,',-.';,. �,t Sf t;.Sf t Sf t Sf t Sf -t Sf t-1f t f.:, � ' � ::Sf t 3r: t Sf t Sf "t Sf f t f.' S -' t Sf t: t t f t a t .a t a t� s 'r ' " s Amendment - s sstta� ry tY^ a aa ` ssttta s Ss ' s' t t t t . t::f 2'.,:,'",_3: t r.33 f tSf t f t ft r.3.3, t Sf t:Sf t SfSf - t Sf t:Sf t i:f a tt t rrr"iS'Sk,: s. aa :,: a : .a .a. a , " , , Ss ' s i s s s s ' .. .. s .. ' s � s..,,,,,..-,.„,,,f s s.,,,-,,2,-,.,_ .s r X fs f f ` � ' � f f f f f ',:.'„,"",:,-3, f -!'e:,'",,,-:. t'-',--3:: ' t f tf t ,' t''l ttSf tt S` tt Sf tt Sf att S� te Sf tt Sf tt Sf {t S ' St.St S45t Sat S 5} S ;t S5t S ;t S ,-3: S ,t S ,t S ,t Sat ;t ;t ;t ,.� f". • The TCDA is interested in increasing the Maximum Indebtedness of the City Center Urban Renewal Area by $20,800,000 to allow for allocating additional funds to projects in the Plan . • This brings the total MI to $42,800,000. • New Debt can issued until 2036. • Plan originally approved by voters in 2006 with a substantial amendment to add acreage in 2017. kti:"t•.:.,f-':-. 1-1.01 :01004 fil Pziwo,:-$A4111 pc'at toil CRASH COURSE UR 101 rt,A tej:tivi to tc,,,0 tit Nt..,,Nlmva% 0,twilMV1-4 0,0 tej:tql icrOtc,otti afrie&.-643,,wa. to tc0 tit: Nt..,,Nlmva% rtotej..11 0,,,wamval 0,0 tejj.:11 e,...... ....a ...„,A 1..ks:0 k-fisj:ttl 6.7,„.4.,-;•-4.'4 t4"'' i., ,..\4.,. .1.1,•,, ,,, '.4..,A, tav,, kva,,, mi i REGULAR TAXING kleig,14 t,f0 1 JURISDICTIONS 1--..i•:6‘,.....itgi.:7 iW'q wili,t,,11/1 ,....,.-.pl.-.-.".it..01-•-.§.44-..1.14T-i-....i.40A,A.f;x01.4.'*--i.vi.:40'.-tVo ;IaTr,..0,;„,,,„ro,.;,,,.,,,,-, CityCounty, Etc. t--„ma.z.m,4A ykis,v, 0,M.-tvvit n- l'Avitz.M.,,IA orov,soli trAv-a.z.7:4s,":10 ovoyevoyei ,....„.,„0,..1 .... .... ..gti•''',7 447-4 -‘ kitra;:, :tqA .... :•.V''' 0.4(444.1 C RAS H CO U RS E U R 101 m_.w.677...4.s1 xf,..,04,4411 „...4.,,..,, ,;,•.,:*„.„ ,.. xf,..,04,411 F.p...,..„0.-„„‘„....,., womfoi 4.,....„0.0.n, „...4.,,..,, ,;,•.,:*„.„ ,.. 4xf,..,04,4411 .,....„0.0.n, „...4.,,..,, ,;,•.,:*„.„ ,.. L..„ tvoloat4,1,, AA 11 PO.14‘1 kiv*, Ili wovriA,,11 _ „.,.,„„,,_ ,.v,,v4-.- ,y,',-.WY-:.• ..ft- .,.1 ,,-g.,,,, sv. ,-,.1.. .,,,,,..„.„,,,,.,.:„,.,,,,4-',./...,,, ,i•-.-Nwt.-----.40 ,--,"Po',,,,,:.,,,,-.4., 't=!:.,.:..*4:-...4,41t.-_,i:'•AV.4.44,'.1--.4.40,;;;',W,q it„,..,4,...i':•'e,4,k,-,;:':',..1.46- -11,;_.I$V1".--At,.„.;-). - I ..444,‘i-d4i 14 0*-.i--.IT4',;;,..:‘,;far.r.,q it,.,...4,,'•'e N.,,,fk,;.i WiT4 -71*. 1w..-047:e.:04*t.,,s6,11,-.....7Zti't, KtX.!.:41,,, -,7•.%..„ vm.-. .'‘.-V '.r'::17•e"; ,_440,..,,q."%til.,A.t.'q.ski.h.14,40,,,-.-..„.040,mviao--,:•-. .,,,,op ,,....,;,e qi,,..4i,:,,e vi,. la 1 ,•t - -7.".-:_440 /Ns, it.t.7:ztatt.:-.W1::-*4:-A-141;',**,;;-..."q i,P0k041.1',.-:11%,:,,:r vti,,,1%,.c';.:$,., wV:MW4,rx4:„mP4:,mmIn.,t,..,ti,,,tiif....d.d,,i...s'...,rOft,.rtio0A?,tWt,4-.lAZ'a„vN-dS.4.-,*;**.,,•-,.4t„•,.,,,:.4.4.,44..i.40*,:',1‘at„ata,4v,V:,,24A,4x40,4:,,S774,.,....4„n..•,.-'W66v,77,„,,A'4.*„,.4.t.,.4',4,0'1„,,,.,,.:1...1-'.-,'4N.,.A.a.N,;t,t.%a..', ,,,.. 000P44..4..R\a O4,4 PERa*aaT Y TA00"X 'O‘'wL,.1.''/.4',04''m.*'a,'N.2v-e,'-;,'-.„,!..*7',0,*'',,,A14I,,t.1f.....„:r.q4,.-..''71,•-.„`'".V0igi„4l,.,,o'it4...;,4.'I4,t.R,-i,-...".;4k'„0•A4Z;.;,%-..,*..'','i4'4SNt1.0,W„z,-)'iil.t'k-,,a..04-,,''.',-4:,'q,..:,•,'W4*Z„*•M-t„,....t:.•„.,,..0/•,O':',,=7-„0,.A-0..,,.,.,..:......„.,,. 0,,a'.,,...,.,.i.•.,,.:..,,1=,4‘.•..%.:%0t,7•,.'.,,.,?,W„,P0,,„0,..'i,”t„.k.qnP',,.,.V.„.•,..1t5,kg0„ .4wya1,.i„,.A,Af.„-i0,A o4:4:1,8l,v,,,,,-ie,,•,.i:.7.m,,ANii..:''4 w:i-tt,7.i..t,'.,--A;4Rtrl-4.0.a,,n,.,x,,4, .e , l--t 44•-,.- iW. tr •- k'tIV • MA INCREASES REGULAR TAXING 1,3%ApPrecation „ JURISDICTIONS 2.Substntal mprovenents WCity, Count Etc. 0-rfdri--.-40.4..t4fick ,t4.,.t.Avevax.re, mi.,At,04,-1 go-Nta:sw*, lefv".4144:14 0,Avolt „...---- bc-0,, 04 t;;041 il*44(' :'•.;44 C RAS H CO U RS E u R 10 1 ,‘,„....... ,,,., • ..,„,,,,ti.,4, ,: „„ fr.r.2M,0) ''. .'„•,,yr,-4,4,1,40 CITY t...sokE seks4 ggs‘cis,M. A: ._ ,..„0,,„,„444 N, PO*1'0 1 ut,.4.Q.,,em,,,, ,,!,...oi'.'-,,,?W•\-.,',,'.,:-;„ - ..krz,.:fta 4-4.04,...-v .- : ..-,I.-, gn,A V k j,' ' • %i?',7,,Ti' PO*1'01 afEr.- ',:, Zer1174? ''''.4sEilittl 1,..- ...:1.-- ,0 .. ...0, •s.„„- .,,,,,, AA. kits‘ 1-,N,.....14 g..6-74,,..•...,itsi tr:'.:V, ?.7 Z.i.o,..e.rs" q7:40.,',, ViP:•,..**,- 4104.'...,4ktiti'AVW•4120'."t'''' Wg..."vii.f4 1 At.56%;1',.Z4V,..:404'.4**5 •Sao'''',,;:le';'f-e';',4174:-taty.:`,4% Aty:`'Wty- %tip- 14.;..,las''.-..1.‘?:' &e•Vil.V7;:sltAisk 7ZSIst VNit'l's. .s04Zst‘..- 4tXw4 1 . 0 0/4 N• "1 %elketiS t"7.:,l.!'s-et4,1-**:'Z'':0%e1ti,i..`.iA*4.ie,$._,J,?V 4p-,•.c.",1''i,Z4k,Wv,•-i,.A'"'0;1,esrrfe,z'.,e„'-R-s'-.6tt.,-=,.s..,-:.a.'..i,q.,4.s"l/,:tit..4.,f....-t'..A1:t.,.:';','4.7.,?4-,-,.,.-.%.4A.'sk„,,l4A0-w,.,ot,,s.-te.i:,.-sis1i,,.'"I.laYs1-fe:',,4s5e,$4,::,.A..g,4,.ft.4,v,,-sl7-%-4,:-,ig,i.-,l,.,,4,.s--4Ue,i,A:,r:*.:.4,,,,,r,.E-4,.-11..,.47ri.;...r,..:..,,,;.„N;:r;i*.w-s,,'A,,‘`tv,t.v',o..4-,e...„vVl...,t0.%:,4.,;s".I,0..:tf&.#1,*11 ., .. f1hiA'*4 I I 1 PROPERTY TAX LA INCREASES REGULAR TAXING A 1,3%ApPrecaon 0JURISDICTIONS 2. 0 Cty, County, Etc, r Its..n*mo, 0,0,001 rn*K24-40 0,0,4044.1 OWAM4,1" 4A- ... Tax Increment Finance Over Time Increased tax Depressed revenues to all conditions 1 . 1 , I 1 R Ios:•:0•V"-..i • ••'-di.`4P.' •••0•2„4.44*.g.44, qig-t:45..A.W..,,,.,,k.b•..„, ArrA,kositarse ,,,,40;;,:ukv,,,,,,a0,•-•*.Y1444.400-4 i-,:0 ....A.sani#41r.f-74**1:1,,i1SSIM „.'40,1•Vb.IVI•N‘uat,M-gi,rArtfffleft.„Mat„„,,,A3 .,,,.. ' 4srvIroltonrpfle,,43.51,4011% .....3 .i. -.•,'W VW ''VW ''''$'''"'th '44*4'7't.h.•.4'Y.1:'t....I-i:W.S100,MSAVN :::..'"2. i •.g!'"11***''Vtbg'l'41,V,V•,-,,,,,,,,e0,•,-,;-v4,V,,,-:-,o,irmOgallaN, „.4.41I*47,,Arratral,-.''''.4•'..41.$441.1•Wingfrea'W,14 .,,,.... „.,,, g ,I,oaaa4ttetOataetaettitet..giZr'''-.11t 0064-01114 : qd4r,,,,-. . • 'TM: 1 A, ,.,...t.r ,4:r 4.,,4-, 4.:., l„.-,{1.. ,, , ,,,....4,..,. i z n i-•4 4 0 , .7:*,k,,V7 apt:2T!Opt:2,f ''''..,*1-rk '*Irk: '*Irk: ' *Irk:.,' f•Paree,- ,P,I•rear -...,,Varee.,.WVWX,•1.0:.'n4k.%.1.-.A ...., Z... ....„„51.4.&0440,0440,44044.404040,AT.5.•:::4115.•:Ziatiggi;1104 L.U. i - " '"VO'''---v0w4rg*w4,_rg*w4,_ro*w-t,i_roOw--"v,N%oyrvta•,,,w4•.,,-.=Aqtyika:xliat4 ,4",roratruympr"r*aoearv*:,,,-,,...:.,,,-,, .effrealimme , ,r. *:...41.;-4.415.-,,,..•wm15.,;;,• 4•,5115.:,;,,,,.: 15.:,;,..4,,,,, I5.,:p.4,c,.43.,-. ,4,.v.,-* 1.1g ...1v,v,,,,w4v,./..sil, v4 S .44.0404041,1441-0.44.4404.404.4r4-114f,;.,0,•A,...„:•.:(,10.05tetom...s. S,'"-,-Veg'",'Veg'" '`VOg.'" VOY.'"'''VOY"I'VOY"i'Vv.,*"i'Vte4W44-VW-00,4,-*•.„A%-.41-4-#50,,,--,40-0:$ (:t.: ''-.T.'4 '' ' ' ' ,;,.',4:1* ",";''Al,.'iq?txIht'h?:ith?:r4M'irV--',.„c,..'C':'PZ''14-;:.:?4---1..I .4J Z::_!' '11.7441:45:14.15441.001311":4,-VAt:':'•i'':2 ,•--.4;:', •4141,4144 >,..., . 'q ,•5..:;.:ttdktaNONertetar‘lti:ikf..41.4 ,5.4 1,,,,,,,41.44104•4&144WCAV.:::*t.,,, ,y 44,04,.:4040: 4.1t..7 i- g" ••••!4•444••••-•,%-.,.:,•~,Wee.`,,Wee.4.q.W14,**5.„Vao 5.W.,,Vao 51;,;V:,:*.,4,4:,..w.,...wvoxv-44., *,kowi.,„„Nseo, ,...,4M,Aat',,,,,ak4.4tA, TIUAL,:46;vskolk,44,1k,AtIlaimtl•kvii.4.,..1k,a4:...4.. . .041t,:.0.0...m.4..04...„*„.5.1.r., •=•4,-.V.,.. .;`:‘,1•AWAKAWAriLASeIVir.LAVSAeSVMPSVIVfA'VIVOWV„.6W5W.Wii.,._'W„.e 51-10•4';‘#4Y'-AkbY'i'tKingittekcfi g...o, -..-,,,.-0,,,,w.-goN,„:,.‘'-gg ,v,i'-g4N,•;?,,,.-KIN,,,%--ak-,*--mxt,*--gok-•:.1-1.1- „.,A,Ilip,,,,A,Ip.,,,A,-.!1*.r.,,,,4-.!4.,,O,..!1,,. ,,,O,..!:,414.44'.,,::,tIONOWNITT-A, 0•784(p„1,,,,';;•,t,e.1...,14,/4:.t fee.4.,f;A CA,e 4,41.6t1,'t e 4;4%14/4,•:^iiig:at,.iitg:,•1,<.•:V.,f..iaig..,e-;.•:',:,_, -,t4..t.'Aill-740.r.,•44*•!,X.V.;!,,,A0•ZAWA4904-404tit"*14:WW:g e•-•, V.4F4t..VVA•.c,.OV•ex.0,A'.4c,e.aVr•ME'•WV•W•eti,Pitelaff•-'IklWipiqtWifyg.t.'wt.*VwipZfqtAgk.O.R. .4041.,..44,1„...irk031,,,Awag31,,,,V.,...V.KA3.4,04.44 -::/ A.7p...egi.,„1.44`ka.,„1.04*,0'..401,1,,,,..4,44•4441.,•414044,41.,4444.‘,..4-01V41.,,,i,.4414411VOIC.4,04NV,...%ilq4:Uspk*Uss%k..R., ..10-•;MVV.W.Migaigikk.**44.0 '- 1:0•44) 0, 11A., OX1940•11*'Vkri:*W•gK*Aegr0*AeOAAef:g•hkefV•hkt4S-f,p4•W•P.•O•MqkLI.•:'fpn.A.Na•V,Wtaq•Mtf:atk-cW ,akgPR•k*ma4,VP•IA.6a,fr:A%Va,„i,,A.,VPE•kt,Prllttit:401:t31reSttS,S,Y.MA,OVA 401,1001,1101thiglitegeratalrfalWraaWrea,Sal r4-40-,lagn:.40tig,„0:%„16tig,„*0-444114640,10464PA Pa'1,tf'Ot?:',.0'5'410 14?TA,145,Vgat0010,001WSIS4MOONIAOMitaVarg 0:400100449.00AMIStalMategtiligtillittivitattlatoottoottp0400.4n,optionvowitowil MCOSIctattNatfriteerOZWOMPASSPASWASAtetalmffitxr*****044trogooto-ormtiom I'''''''"WwAt'Y'''PavY1-'4"-*O"POwAtvivEOP4tvi40400****Wadeit000"04.*M.logouvewmoWl -v-4pg. v-4'6.3,--v-4'6.3-...44-4m3,-,,,,Isk-?6,#,,,A,4kk,14,4,A,„.4 .44'e,,,,s54,,-,Ve,,,,s541,,-.41,,!,,,s54i,,-.01,,,!,,,A%4,4,.!,,=Ai,,..,:iii,4Aik,,,,,,,A.(41..ki,,,,,,,,,,,t,41:;•._,,,,,,,,t....,,,,,,,,,t...,,,,,,,,,t....,,,,,,,,,,,t,.,•, t T. t t i t4t „,' � iga .,...`. Accomplishments c• $ 48.8M - Private investment into property improvements and new construction (3x the amount of investment in the 12 years preceding urban renewal). • 64% - Increase in assessed value between 2006 — 2019 (compared to a 56% increase in assessed value citywide). • 28 - Matching grants for building improvements to downtown businesses. • $2.60:$1.00 - Leverage ratio of private to public investment into urban renewal tenant and storefront improvements. • 234 - New apartments constructed. • 32% - Increase in housing in City Center URA (compared to a 12% increase in the rest of Tigard). i' u t '.� t u: - t o .t a r'{f t {i: t o .t a 2.-t.f t %: t o t o i',u t {.i 2 u,:. t ,, ..2 ,, t u.- i: i i -.i is i i i i is i i - i is i i i .i .i:.i.i...,,: 2 {f 2 {,,f 2 {f 2 {t 2 {t 2.-{ {'.l i2 t 2 {t 2 2 t i {t 2 {i i Burnham {t {t {t {t {t 1..fiirl.:';:il .? � J � J �J J � J J J J J i}.2. {l� i 2 {t i}2 {t 2�'{t i t {4� i t {l..i 2 { i}.2 {t i t it i t {t'�. i t {t i}2 {t i t {fi 2 {t i}.2 {t i t it i t {4�. i t {t t}2 {t i 2'y{t i t t.l i t {t J J �'J J J J J 'J' J � J J J 'J J J J �'J J J J {' i 2 {f ...i {t .t {t i 2 iImprovements l i 2it i {t i 2 {t i, 2 {t i 2'{t i 2 {'.l .2 {t t..t,l 2 {4 2 {t '.2 {t 2'.{t 2 14• 2 {t.:. 2 {t ..2 {t „_ 2 {4• 2 {t 2 {t 2'y{t 2 1;4 2 {1.:. 2 {t .2 {t 2'it 2 {4• 2 {t s 2 {t 2 {t j,l 2 { '. S r._ i �i i i i , r-f'.:• r-f +f ,+.:.:'r-f rf'. ..fit... ..fit... .fn. vt`=y�,.n:vtx,y.:. i- a- +ak, " - . r v' a '. t YZF^':.:t:}, .f }.; .f }.;s. *Y r, i ra i ra,• rarEr's �t' ;,t' ;, ' t rz7 ,i.arigi:..t } __ t!• Yt Y2.'..-::f-':;a,.,,a.f.+:;a;..,h v$.+:;a, ....v i• i,,,ta i,,,ta i µ;.. i µ,... i ra i.a,;... e _ '>t z.'- :, r x t .:.t . .0:.t ,' ars• y,_. } .. .ar:�}n .ar:• aw•' 71 ' a,N.. .ar=•.. a'1.. .aw .a:'-�r��, +� .+5��n • r s 3.� 3= :'3;, i:}v :'sz,:n+r',-g'„,a_:>x�t,4.,.,a.T`.14:li ftt'^ '-R� �F -R " ..>�`_ ..>�rx ~ten --�" --�" -�' -�'; �` r �.,.�,�rx .-:krr .-:'�•rr _v,>:-�. _',.`�. a.: >�;-: '`T.n'`°`�;- '`1h-'.- `7h-'.- `�'.:. -.a. �v:. a 1�' :�- �:ik;:'' `r,:ik;a ,.sfi, Ksfi, -ms's€ ->'\€ -..'t@'��a-..}g'+,�v':1@+, 1@+, 1. .1:_+, .1+, .1'. 1. ,-.�>+,: s.'\�' -.,:yf�. -- •} ,...,:.mak= , `: , .., a'n;;-:•"iv;:'...:5.-�n� �::5h�`�'S;'`5�:,;:SY:c ..y!:.,.... '..Y`'r tie: �.'> Y.". 4 e"t�i'� eat e 4. �.e.�'.>' -.e��. '�e 3v".5s. ,;v :,s+''s x.+�s� � a �-.:,. �;-�_�. «;. ,�.:a z�t u�3 �^N r..-.W �kF.,,. <'?�,,. �'?::':v-'tat1'?::uv�'`"t`ar „:«'�'.;'.�>a 'v"�r §r 1" i -n':t -n':t -ab ',v ;.-N x�;.r:. "T_:,�n .;x:,� .a-„fi' .>� .a-„'t' . .a-„'t ,�;.r ;,>�:._ .:.-,.:,_ - :..::..-.,.r-..,_•._>r,t-.,_•._>�,t_>.,•�,:.�a.t`_,•.,..�.ds> .�,:r_. .�,:r_. .�:.f_. �fu .fu a.fu a.fu a.f-' f a.f- M1d�.;' �y.� %'a4'7:v e:>.4'7a i'T4.7:v ?.:'.fi';x '?.:'.fi';x A 5':Y i''E.n-,{�;n:F%,e'e.n-arr..:.FS�"k`r=,{.�; `�':.�^ "�+_.�:^ `.k �"�-::' �r"y':' �r"y':' `�4 t>.M�� ttM�� tt � TtM�- TtM�- td�-a rpt�,`�*-a�. Jr" a:, y`�J'-= e,s�J'-= ..�>vJs .•'>vJs eJs .xt J- :,tTs. �� sTs sus a .v •.>:a5„s:�meq,::..::i5„s:.;...,,.:...:3:sty':}s,s::...:3:s:y':}s,s:,,;.,�.:>t<..rs`>�:+f �',_ � vtJ'.:.:7"zs.5.v .• :7"s, ai.�5 .�.u .�.u 5x u "'z'k Yt� .px?Rs�:Sv 5 '� -.�:, #q'� -€ >�,.�;:,.". >re` „.u::.;x:i„,.u:,:.,x:i„,:y.:.,...,x:i,�,.,ky�!z•^..•x:ti2,'i.,h"^;:•x:� ,k,.�?x'� �u ,..:. ,-.r v ',.: ,-.'S s.sv.'.::{ln.'::v:-..:-k '-^'::a'.i:.":�,:,�,x�.; „kn p,S<k .c •:.k';.,...,..•:�v:.,,A,.a:t:.va:,5:,, •3 ....k•-.c, .k•a _;tF•�n ->:F•�n k.. .F.. -+':§,.. .k•.v 'N fi: -:k=�` �.;. `s.......+>:xa:`s.`:�":,>:si:iV:�:'::;>:'siriV:z 5k'e:;e.,anV:z 5k'e:;r:'.i:'A:z tk":,>=.a.. ,>S� i t 9 t i i .,C,;�.,..Yo.S n.ea'� C 4. 4. � C 3 x 4-- `�- "s"'�;'r�„ _*F,,. �kF'„•” �'xF?„ .r��w � }' .,1 �,.,'3, ,„ ��, L �+v.. '�'_"!S�`, cy ':�„ '� zt -k �t t a set }5 �t }L}•.� -' � � - sem' ky :2 F2 :� � -. ' �. '9•=:,� E S a i A`tt:,', 9 9 F4. e "v 5'• :,; r. ''E 4� 4 v�.�i:. :a4,.v :a4. 4 ':v ::irr�;v S. v _ y g�� -1 rit.- '{ '�"_'''-i, �'.2 f' k� �'t 7�, f +:, f V .r L n 5 'r '':.' f`P ,a�' t s 3 ' Z �! I 1 t: ". 'k .fir _�f r f4. : ' t� � FF �' n c _ 4 4 _ 4 �' s l s r S'P+ f � 4”'•�+,a ��'#-f r P'C' ✓4 t -'i -L,•".r '`� s N r r,r s..; 4x��,'C„” ; a' ” C ti. ' }-v .;.� 3i' 4 ' '4yys'” 't�F :s 4'.. *'4,a, ( ,3 „,+.-. y r�5 {}3.t}'p y 'fir. - k,$ , ,kf, r ,Aj: ,'asa �o Vx 5kt� .4`kk, e n'e: k ` - rF § - 9 T 3 C i C 5 ^'S C 4v' $ 2 .Y...,-..:11',;%,',:.i.,.,....':‘:: i„ m-r'-nc: �.' �x u ,'•a,t }" ,. i }�s''vr ��:. "� a- •;�£ ty{}. T- +, ,�.ta,e„�,� '$ tNt �,..� r y : % ,, rsF ,tea .. .,_,„-.,..,€,,,,,,,,,,,. .,...--,..7...i-,} � '�r- i e-" „sy ' .. .r ,�.yl s.e '^'g _ '� k I} � yF h _ � a t � r +�W€t*'`e�, $� �P� -':�.r ':44",4*- :�t r� :;:::;41:40k'-'7.: 1: ',4;."1 :4;" -.µ r t,F. si`t"rets ,. t �' : -..,,,, 41-r� t r r";•. ::.2 e . ''n '. r ;. reµ... _, t Y+' w,.; o- ,-7,1„4-imis.4.,n: yf yni e F' i e v e ta..., a s:-� :r_'+w_'> �;': ;.;.,��. :': . Vis• ... s s .._.. s ...,. ._. -`- ': {t i 2'tl i 2 '.4 i 2 {t .i:'+ 2 {' {t i {t i:2'it i i i + {t i +'it i 2 J: i {!' .., + {t i, ',t i it . ? .? '.)' . .? .? ,, .... a -- , .? J •','.? ,. ? .. !!!!!!!!MO!W!P!!!"!!M!q!!Wgl!!T! 7717°7777:!!::177: 7-1-:!:, 2tl2 {.42 {t 2 {! 2'.{t 2 t.4 2 {.4 2 {t '.,:t {t 2't'f 2 {.4 2 {t 2 {t 2'y{t 2 {..4 2 {.4._ 2 {t ..2 {! 2'tt 2 2 2 ! 2 {.4 i i i, i i i .i i.. i i i i, i. i i .�i i.. i iii i J "' J .' J -�'J J' J J J 'J' J J J -�'J J'! a J J t 2 21�{!, Completed .:,. :„ ,,, :,..„, „, 11. i {t'. t 2 {t ,,. -,:!77,77,7.: i7, ,� JJ J J -�'J J' J J '- J ,'J J JJ ,:,.,,,,,,•,...„. {., ,7 2' t i {4 i 2 {l.. i 2 {! {! i 2 it i 2 . J' J J aJ • Streetscape Improvements ,, • Ash Avenue Connection � � r5}a • Burnham Street Public � ffiv � �� � r. r Parking Lot 1 � „„ f.} �Y j „� �� � �. i �* S .,,,,,,,,..„..,,,„....-,..,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,t,, x� _ ��"'�b �,*.• � tA � } St}Ash Avenue Dog Part4 • Fanno Creek Regional Trail „„„„„..,..„.„„.......„...,,,„...,..„.,,,,,...„..„.„,„,„?-1„,,,grai. . „ Undercrossing lights { xs x �.„.„.„,,,,,,„,,,i.,,_„.„ -, ,,,,,,,,,„ A, t . M { ffi r ';• Facade & Interior z. jFcF Li ` . j� £ }y 4 � }Improvement Grants , .� ,,,,, , i t '.,2� i t 2�t'.{ t i is�.� Z i t �..Z i t .2'�.t t 2 t4. t i 4. : t t t..: Z t .2 i t 2'�.t t i F�- Z i t Z i t 2-,i t i.. i i .i .i, i i i .i .�i i.. i ice i. i a ." a a a .a. a r,.: J J -'J J' J' J J JJ J a a Vf t4. it 2 tl .2 t.l... .2 4 ...2 t4. 2.il. .2 4 2 4� + t4 .::t t.4. .2.il 2 t.4. .2 t4. .....+ t4. ., ytl 2'-,il 2 t:l 2 t4� `..c.::t-, i.. i i .i i .i i.. i i i � i i i .�i. .? J -, J J' J J J JJ J ..�J': J J J ,J tl „2 it i 2 t:l i 2 il. i 2 it i..t tl i 2'.tl i 2 il' 2 iActive 2 t 2 2'yt � it ,:i t J a J J J 'J J J J J ...2 ..2 2 . ..2 ..2' 2 2 ..2 ' 2 2 ..2 .2' .2 2 i 2 ...2' ..2 2 ...2'{ „..,...,',..___ it ii t' _1'� „.... it } it . tl it it i:.i it i}. tl is,i,l i it _ i it i} it ytl i 4 il,.:.i it i}. it i, it i t4. i il. i it i. i i i....-, it t:l it ,____,_ ._. J J J J J 'J J .? . .?' J a J 'J J J J J ...2y.t:l t t 4.• + i l t l .2'-,.t l .t'.' 2 t t', t t ...2 t t .2'-,.t'l t 4, 2 t t 2 t t ...2'-, 4.,3 2 t - 2 t t ...2-,t f .2-,.tC 2 t 4•. i i .i i „, i .i i „ i . � i „, i i ,, Main Street at Fanno Creek Development }� M1hfi'�}�!t h&-- lb L kbd ' zit : � � - fps j�e hf,,u,.... „„,„,., CY t' - ��r'{�' � •: 'Y�wx' Y „„,„,,,.,,___„-%1„.„.....„,.,. ..4 .,...i..,...:. .S .4. f ' ESC. 4 'fYf°t 1' �h1' 4f J, i 4 'q} ,,I�y'.�L+�+ ( °s; '''"t r wr .;. 3 'Sk '��;i -w_r t Y 5 4,,f .,i..:.,-,;•'-. ----"''''''” -4,"..4.-"..fA:,,,"•:::"'"-i•±.4• :'r'''''';;;"j'Aig: •`;'-•:-"A.-- e.: s 3 y 3 J'� �w` Ya """-';.,:• :. ';i�, 'C s7 � � � �rn 3 7 r AA� !��'y 7 ���F.s� ,�y�'c�'� �S s � a �Ky .., . _.„..,.......41-,y.....,,‘,..-..,e......,.....-.- e.¢ t 351�'� -t -.i ',::::',:',.:i),:?,;, ,��� s c 'ark{rt�xc 41 �� '�'''?`t � { 3�tt'� c �s,i t � � x ���3 �. .. t �"may" �t�-� r '3,,.. .. .:3::;,,,,,,::.•,,_,'„,.,---, 'it „ $ s �, dors . it ..::t it .2 tl. .2 t.l... t.4. . ...2 2 it .:: il. 2 l 2 t4 .2 t4 .:. 4 .:.tytl .2 t4 ' t4. . it 2 t4. .2.il 2 t4,_ 2 il. 2 it 2'ytl 2 t:l 2 t `..:.,:ty i.. i i .i .i, .. i i i .i� i i .�i i.. i i a.." a a .a. a 1,.: J J Ja' a J J 't'J J' J J J 'J J a a a it i}2 it i 2 tl i 2 it _ i it i}2 it i 2_il i 2 � 2 it 2 it t' i:l ''-i 2Projects 2 ,, 2 it i 2 it i l�. i 2 it t} it i 2'it i 2 : i 2 it ,i ty J J J J - .? a ,.. .........__ .2'.t'.4. 2't:4_ 2 i l' ...2 t 4 `.2:i l .2't.4_ 2 t.4 i i i i.. i i i i .i i. i i i . , ., .? J' J J J ' J J J J 'J J ':32 2 � , 2�� � , ",�.,.2 ,2 ,�:,.2 :, :.. :,.2 .,.2 .,.2 :,.2'i it it i. _.il it i mil t4 i i it i}. it is it i t4. i it i it i. ytl i i,l i il..i.... ,___,_,_____,____ .? J 'J JJ J' J J J 'J J J J - .51.,,,,,,,„ '.2. it 2 l ..„:„:„,_....„,.... 2 t 2 it .2 it .2.il 2 t4 it 2 it ytl t.4 2 t4 2 it '.2 it 2'it 2 t:4 2 it 2 it 2tl 2 t:l 2 t4. .,,,...._.: .,i.: i i - i i i i i is i i� i� � i• Urban Renewal Impr....._ ovement Progra".,..„,...,_,,,,_... ,_ m • Universalt.tPlaza design ,„:, 4o41, ,„, _ 1' 1 4 1 4 4 h- Y " ;i 5 {,ask,SC iM , A, S r{ h '. r 3 G - n tr � y 'x .,„,-r.,„,;,.—,,.,,„,-,,,„„-.,,„,,,,,:.:.,,,.„:-,-,-„-:„.:,-,-- `` } te9i A 1� {l.a �- M, ; ! f b � lf 0 a , l�x . ', Na rd Zf .' K� F.� w rlti,F}u. 4 • . JaY4; n fix '..,,',,,,„;.•,,,,,,,,.,„;,,,,:474,?:1* �WC4 ,: � �� ���ti 'A `S�rt {'SIY 2i 2:' 14 i :--44•. l t,fl tC ''..m.,. ;�: °A`�s..4 3*#3i•t *,:.t 4Xd,^ . `_ �0.:43��ls�}itiV� i'..,....-,.....,,i,".:,;:-.q;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, �r.�t t''''r`'l���i+.,�v,� S ut�vY .fi ��tiC`a''iSi'fi yy . . t'*�' J rk� tai t`�..+ .. +:' s ^i q l i "n.4' x.' �: ; 'v.,4,{ ;�',-n r` �a--- . •a pro Projects rSupported t t�t".tsAdditional �-T n t.4tt'd 4:y3zx' t t* fro the Substantial A' tm n'k d .• Construction of New Streets to Provide Connectivity • Tigard Heritage Trail Continuation to Hall Blvd . • Fanno Creek Trail Improvements • Universal Plaza (shade structures, community room, final features) • Shared Parking Structure • Affordable Housing and Mixed-Use Development Assistance • Pedestrian Safety and Streetscape Improvements • Land Acquisition r a mr a r a r .W r a0 ..t t t t.-' t t t ..t .t- t t .xt t ' ` t... ` �` S�`.. t �` t S�` t... S�` t S�` t S�` :..t S� t... S� t... S� t �`.' S t. t S� S� S� � �s .�� Sf t t Sf t f:f t t Sf .:tProcess Timeline as + a+ aS' aand Sr 5'k��,:-staSSt' sta , stasS.:r, sta. �:P star S'k, s St. ,St :� t S .. ..�V S . ,4 4 # .4 .4 S� SSS � L ' s s -sta .. .SSSStiS� .SSMSS .1! .0; WW5s s' s ' . �: r s r s1.: � s i s r kXr' r > : ..,y.,, }'I :5 .. ., . :,, ..ti 5.,..,. ,,� ,.. '' .-;„ty f ..- t :f t :f,.. t f,...-;t f...- t t� t..,s t s t s .t s �., s s t s t t- > December 9- TCAC recommended approval > December 15 - TCDA Board >January 4 - Tigard Planning Commission > Before February 9 - Resolutions by Taxing Districts (Washington County, TVF&R, TTSD) > February 9 - City Council Hearing > May 18 — Ballot Measure goes before Tigard Voters Ttt` this 5f..Plan l o to f'..'. the t� rS7 ��- .". Sf t t Sf t t Sf Comprehensive SSf.. P ?Existing findings remain with some additions • Natural Resources and Historic Areas • Economic Development • Housing • Transportation • Special Planning Areas- Downtown • Parks, Recreation, Trails, And Open Space Yr s Consistent Plans. , SsS,'7������fC_ss ttit r kL���t�fCr titt rrxS�, .::.trtt�..r, ,; t SSSS'f ,s.. „, .,..`S alit ..,rs r f S .. om„s r s t S t s r'. .. .- t' t .. t : .a St „ ,� 1rs ' .r. s r :` s s s f t Sf S tS , S s r e� s r t t s.' s st � t , r, S. -, f ?f .t : _ .., r „ '. , , ' :, s tStt t r r,� rSf ' 5S' :'.. 1'''';'!.;.-.'4''''',2,:-:':f t : aiet ' t S , 'an, .. c,4,S'.fl.:C, s s r'Lks k .5kf.i t S: ,t t t. t Lr :�L,w -r.ue,w n � s r' k It f tt ,., om . �,;� .�L_w_ .: .; ,;, ..-L,_wr 'Lw • 33 Transportation System Plan • Tigard Parks System Master plan • Affordable Housing plan 2025 • Tigard Strategic Plan 2020- ,n.,n"1q4t;t,�:.yy r rr s t.4tt f ss +�t a+�t 5 t".r.. tt r f? t ff $r � r:" s• :: Recommendation/Suggested t# . � s n � s r� s r'� s rX; k k St kF L ,,,,,. • "I move that the Tigard Planning Commission finds, based upon the information provided in the staff report and the provided attachments, that the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment conforms with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and further recommend that the Tigard City Council adopt the proposed Plan Amendment." r a mr s r r a- r ar'rs a r a r .s r a r a s a r a r a. r a s a r a r r a r a s a r . r .. r r r r m '.5 .:5 ` more? 3, ,..,, `', S1, S1, e�� . ` � ,� „ty� . .. s: s. ,,. ,. ,,,, ,,.,,«7,,,,,.,.v,,,,., ,,. ,,,n, , 7,,,,,. ,,,,,. ,,,,, ,,,«7,,,,,. .�_v,,,,.,,_ 1,. ,,,,,. ,,,,,:r,,,,,. ,L,,,. ,L„,,. ,,,,,.,,,,,,,.r�,,,,,.,,L,,,.,,L, • Contact staff: Sean @ti LaurenS@Jgard-or.gov • Visit website g -or. www.ti ard ov urbanrenewal g 2..,.., ,J _ 0 . M „..„, . „ . , .., . .,. , , . ..... .,„„„, ... , .„,_ . ..Aibik . ..-„,it .,•i,":',•-; ..' ,71.-7.. ''", ,7';', $ -.; ,- ;.-.'',....'%•,,S,• ..,'.;-,y, 1 S s s7 S s • s G, s s s :r s S 5 r '�ir . t i.r .,t tr t it a,t i'� .,t ir....,t tr . t tr .,t tr .,: tr . t ,r . t tr..,t tr .,t tr . t_ir . t rr ..,,t it .,t tr .;t tr...,t ;t,r...,,t i'�,-..,,t tr .. t r tr...,,t tr...,,t tr .,t y:. .Oil J g - i :.4, ii ' '''4'"I'-',.-`::::4441.-8.444- t-oWi{- �j y-' %s, . Agenda a:..rq.4: -< "':' .tet+ '&:4-4-,,:?::*--,, ,f .r'kS. i' ' 9 ,- A ?, $4 'X'`� a'��=p ` .�, 'h ys 'k` , aM�' ` d! ,�.. . n 70t ,fid. J�^.-.. About the CFC projector} �4 ,,:,-,:-',,,,... -4--.:,:, --,-;,-,. ...„- ,, v Y l ,-,-1. c .,.s ,..4.. >- Y ynn s v ,'• '7'-t3'.14 aa y' rr'+. 4'14* t a y• y i • project overview I'M : '*- ,� ' , ',a/ k � ` `� •.7 , s ". ,...„7,-,,,4%,,,,,,„.41„,,,,-,,,, t, -- ,,- 2. `` s-t-,•-V1• -� '"rY �' mf 1: • • Why is it necessary . $ r r ' , t �. ,' , -c � E 1 - ..t i 4. • What are the p -4,,,,-- - ,44,-Ivr.,,,,,,v-,‘.7.1,,:,,,-,,*›,-,..-, ,--,' :. --- -,,,, otential opportunities? °� � K� rh Y,. • why take action now? , ,ig51, t • Next steps k r p � j � i � v�� • • Community engagement i g g • Activities to date s to IN „4 • Upcoming wayget involved • ti r i • Q&A/Discussion r-- A necessary, cost-effective solution to meet Tigard s , needs now and into the future .. ,,. ,tsir,om �' '� j i -, ts'r „ , . ,,,-,., ..,,,,,. ,,,,,.„, , To meet the needs of our growing k 0 F Y 2 �-Sr `bF, the City of Tigard is ,,, i ;; �} £I $3 4 - rt 3� n community, � t'vtt�' �� tr a" ,..4 � s� e �' :2.�*. dtia�-n T ? r considering consolidating most of its public services in a new buildingthat ` `� 1�+� ice. �' '� b '` T',x�, 4'' rz, , a'� /,,..,/. nv n F 1�nMice t43 .sarSd - ..i- s �` e .c,.e-, a; % is „. ext + Xs �. z z y s tr r' s would replace its aging downtown ,""� � ,/yr ` " ,' � 4 • facilities and energize the downtown • ry -y Y "—%I-- ���, ; A 40 441/4 4 � '�# 3,o� "g .gg #� 4}ic'�- 'R�.�'`"p �^��+'"4.rd�ri a .r u �. 1� ��� �',�A" �,�� y� f "� � T.e� r�'"" -:r', , 1, it ,, rp s i d � z n 5 r Q , j€“ g - M �,,,, ,.. ,'+fi e 3 Ee r �3 v�'� $ �" d e -, 1 a , ,, ,,q ,, district at the same time. � t"fRB � 4 $x , ,k } - - tr2•,..,_.1.,,r,1,...---..., ;� W �t -� a ,--40.i._,*y�-,k‘,- .,.��Y- - v. , t ,1 + -4 ea go n�..'S5'::5:3+2Yia?*S5'::5:3+2Yia?,.'S5'::5:3+2Yia?*S5'::5:3+2Yia?,.'S5'::5:3+2Yia?*S5'::5:3+2Yia?,.'S5'::5:3+2Yia?*S5'::5:3+2Yia?,.'S5'::5:3+2Yia?*S5'::5:3+2Yia?,.'S5'::5:3+2Yia?*S5'::5:3+2Yia?,.'S5'::5:3+2Yia?*S5'::5:3+2Yia?,.'S5'::5:3+2Yia?*S5'::5:3+2Yia?,.'S5'::5:3+2Yia?*S5'::5:3+2Yia?,.'S5'::5:3+2Yia?*S5'::5:3+2Yia?,.'S5'::5:3+2Yia?*S5'::5:3+2Yia?,.'S5'::5:3+2Yia?*S5'::5:3+2Yia?,.'S5'::5:3+2Yia?*S5'::5:3+2Yia?,.'S5'::5:3+2Yia?*S5'::5:3+2Yia?,.'S5'::5:3+22"az. ,--- Project description ,,„ ,, .0 Key elements: 0 Design and construct new building to house most city services on current P city-owned property across the street from the current city hall location . 0 Relocate the Public Works yard and construct new building outside of the 1 downtown core. Open up 9.5 acres within the current City Hall site for redevelopment. 0 Potentially relocate and enhance Tigard Skate Park. 1— Project timeline frt, Phase 1: Move Ahead Separately or Together? (August 2019 - Feb. 2020) * Phase 2: Proceed Now or Proceed Later? ( Feb. 2020 - Jan . 2021) • Phase 3: Government Project or Community Project? (2021) } s9r 40 .44 i 44.44 7 ..4 .43 ,411 go why is this project nece r ssa y .,4. :41, go .,4. .43, .,4. ,i3 .,4. g 43i 431 43I t r !;,, 6* %.;1:3,x; r- City buildings need repair to maintain safe operations I Extensive, expensive repairs are The city's facilities maintenance needed — such as the HVAC system, backlog could reach $14 million by sewer connections, and roof of the PD 202E and an additional $19 million building. is needed to bring buildings up to Facilities do not meet current seismic current seismic standards. I standards that will ensure the city can s maintain operations and respond in a seismic event. g I cia;=, ., 1 Properties the city owns or controls a k.fgIkeirkii 1 Property the city is leasing 3 #.fr ��. t�,j ��e • Iy t2---0 - The City is evaluating the best , _ ., _ .a. f `tee nkl iall o .{s,''. dry y' F3 to ,AVO , : .,,,,„.,,.„,„„:,,,,„:„.„.,.,,,,.,,„_,,,,.,.,.,, ..,„ ,„,,,„t„,.,,,,,„„,,,�� 1 x .iN,`7�`ts"a., 1 is i solution for Tigard „... , ,,. r: .„ y, *'say' „ sN' r Constructing ,....,,„„x„,,.,,,,, ,.. .„4„.„.„,,.....,t4,,VF20*.t,'-'r4;"', 14'-'''''jMral:fifMa4W;104.'4,:,.:,,i-i',.,.?,..v.:, ''r'Vigtg':.,,,,,:g,„ two new facilities is more cost-effective > � } =,q ,,r,, ti 4�mww, 5, i k n • a,.:a;.i *}�- - ,440,.... ;..>'.;_. .•. �,,,,. t , - ,g,° mer ,iii`.. ..r=`:'.#t' �.-: i .�,;t=>:r,lit�':,:kk�.> 'i7;�:. u�t�;h,�:/;'::...H.,4;, .M1.u. :.:ACT 's- - u'ri '#�:: .:;a" _aa:; t trying toupgrade Id v over :sus -. ,:�:, comparedo o o e e w���� n � m.: 'x • crt;.: ,-? • Y gbuildings _}� � .�. g Ar.' -44 :,fig.. . ., ;^ .•A. .t:;�: - :s':`et ;;l` }.s!rt- :., �.> y :�:j.?'y:': M<t..>-:>:r=>: :: iu: F - - k`'�;+y s :..b:..9 E.n: '�. '.+tiq tf,3: '�`d'4�:li%�''i'� +: ,'>'.�t;�;^"c`�.'J x+.x.;v,:�y x' .n":'."Krrti-.:-.J','.:.�t i '".'i�;>, next twentyyears and rent additional space. 44, 444A' ���=W >��> � wrt., .$: A�. Even with construction costs, it is still less costly to A � , z� g z ,> Y 3+`k*'+b "r,'`h.:'.b {rt- v' �* ' 4 -4 .' r n k'e�=' ;: >,s.„`,;`.3'�' ` q'4r `A0Br 4 , ,.�',-'',a3'.a�iuO 'F ':-.t>.- - - •40 g the citybecause the new buildings will still have value :aa* . }}. 3 �fi � cA �£ : in 20 years, and the city will be collecting revenues . r 1 .�' :„.„,,,,,,„,„„:,..„,,,„„,,,,,„:„.,,,,„„..„,•",;„„z„..,,,,,,„,„,,,,,,„„,..„,,,:,,,,„.„,,,,,,,.,4,,,...,R,Aw �' - rv. ,„„ k'.e.„,,,..�' 3 1 from property sale and development. r � y'-'S ''.-3 t kn. Y".3iry Consolidation also creates a great opportunity to � � n i.' -. .z ,, ?y .11t .'-Y�X -h t '3, nxa*a4 ', i �� �e N. , ' r ti� , ,�4 ,tea r Sk reimagine how the city's 13.5 acres can contribute to � � � � t � �� o amore livable, walkable downtown . � l� Y 41 4f*, � gl ��,4' t�' , , t Project funding The project can be funded without raising property taxes. Property tax assessments that are set to expire would continue at current levels, if approved by residents in the November 2021 election . Additional financing would include : utility rate increases, special revenue funds, photo red light and vehicular speed enforcement, tax increment financing and land sale proceeds. „,V.,W,1 WI 6 why now? „„ g Resiliency: The pandemic has k 3 `ir ';',0A.1§..:- , .1§ shown us the importance of , { ".4” n' ,VI 7 r Y?� i §"�' a �S x” H' z x` ta ti �"�i :�34.4 � s S $. f ' •{ # 9 ,5S a'�. ,' -1�E fg�'� ,y y .. Y "F 3ie planning for the unexpected and ' �� � �,- � 7 ', r 's-� '° a� � -g� x � �. 'a '-'.4e1%,-,-‹,i '`'4 ��y,i „ -�- a�" r ,;.\-1 � s �s �! ems. set a k�>$. ¢' -� �� t h �,-t t �[�s t t n `�S.'`� S 5. �Y .� ., r,r{� . 5 y i ,rtn. '� - t� -a ��`���a ��'�r�� �a1 �� s � "�n the ability to continue city r �tg r , � � � } , �. 4: P� z_ �+',. t,Arai} +'s, ,-wore,,..,,, „ 4�y .fc�t3,, tit e'' ' x r ,,,, ` e f 7. operations in an emergency. , r -z { xw fl t7 , li, s y tyA ' ?4,1 S 4%e'4'6"''' ,7 , a '�s , t k , kJ ! h 'S44ir `,y3� Y Y " 1tfl1� t � Y i ' p i 2 i3' { d Sll1 rt a � s" � '1'*Cost: Maintenance costs willi .continue to increase, and ' HF aconstruction costs have increased � z� r r ,,,,,-,t, 1. , $� �b 5% annuallyfor several years. If ra� we replace the facilities by 2025, g we can do it without raising property taxes. } s9r 40 .44 5 1 g 7 at43:41,n it ortunities ntial Opp ;11.' What are the potei g 5 5 g g ,r !;,; r---- Improves downtown Tigard „„ :. ..... ..„,,,-„,, rg Changing the City's footprint downtown i 4 �, js..„x#swAi ,',':"..'',,.,.:: :'':'f.,,A1.11TOI,J ,.44'S:= 1'1.,;:--;‘;.:.- � C lb 4 .y .y "R�t 3 c will help: ,v,.4.4.11,6-.6„„,,,,,,, }�yr-., .. # ,: +` . _ s.a-4t f`S �' �5.. ;"t. 3 y„ ,9`FScaf o i 3 `� 1 i �,„,, 3� Existing city properties could be .tom „, mi4S g rdvl din m r hn 00nw r` jh } e e e ope to o e t a 5 e a~����� � � �n �� 1 apartments and expanded affordable �' housing options.• , } ot �,5 r { �, `-ig ” v't 4 z>, r {... n r' » r� }-: New housingwould stimulate "u,`:.3 � rg downtown development, .which • h rg could lead to more shopping, dining, and housing and increase walkability. tis t , �, i3 a e 10 3r a _a ,Tam ,� x� � �. ..�..,��' ...,,} �".'. r' r,;,..�:,�w� "..'' "'v"' ,�•: �..�rr�'�':,,T„�,:� ., . yra+ �"f�!�..-wN::�, '•,r; Redeveloping this area of downtown ty...� , � �tty' y.a { i n �f: `: .:.�a*3c.fx :"wjt fs .ryt,'evyyE,3 w � ".,�-s.: t-Nhv@. i..a,;;s .,i ,fs .:!i';'fsl��e .w���y .7..;,',$.:,-,..0-,-,-," „:u, ”. 1 , i>. ":`, - :i.;. Y j- 'q „. ,�h .:t: '�'x��i'1 '1K'ta.;;4's`31,- ;�.'`S.',x 4, k.:_; '-c'�fs'"..mss..!.;4 .._ w';�-r' .;e:,. .:.:,r,-9; w. .:z�„"T_.-:a 7x0ry :"-",�:rc :'c'' c: .>.;'+, n•,r'>v, �...>:E :`; " <,,x.r �,l7h:r M,Y.'._:.. °`;�7t.°. � ,';Y2�r ya - ., will catalyze the whole area from :.4{ { ,:, .- { : ., . .t. - u: ,? g Main to Hall *T-0.,ta•51,,,:11,§ C 0 111 m u n 1 ty b a Mcg FwE a t i 'f +;. `!y .r:r '�urz tateµ t - } The buildingwill housea ° x ± � „ � � �aSB� y,'x ,t,�, a :+ r ' 4.. k r } k'a rte. tateµ tateµ Lara tata ta-�a t: • At ,,,, '',,. t .liter...„.;;>'''.,,,,a t r p t..,s ..„,„Yt,.,,,„..';Yt�,:. ,„„, ;:""� ., ate. ., a t . ., N gid: communityroom, ava i I a b l e to Pr.a3s rrar uj .w _ r tg - g • • r- :i�'}:` r?:;}� t?:;}� Vii;}� t?:;}� x-, ,Y `3 r';`��; ,�:�;: ,LF':;"t ,LF':;"t,'�">::,,LF':;"t�'�">::,,LF'"�'�-`. ,fit i �, , :c -`v::�f='>:,_ -f�;:i`=>�_, ,..�'F='">�:, ,..�,.i ,..�,.i ,..�,.i 4 �4 F"" 1� 'E }, } .`.� 1f..�.'4� v�'+�"4'�v v,�,`� :;,ry.,�v,,+.,�.rr)iry����,e:,�.rn:i)"i"E nt,�.rn:i)"i"E n*',�.rn�; N reserve for civic meetings and : 4 3, 3, events . lr '..1:::'; 1rr F , � r �$ r V � �r @ � 'x Anew parkingstructurewill ,r ,- , ` fi - i f ' x''�rr�'Y �+�� X rs fl r'4Ei Y !'`i.t�fg ttr��+ �@ 't �i tF" �'"' -.` i- 4} T,'. ¢'&„;',- '� s t �',Mc: Aga !-;:n, �'' '�..y.4 t' `.�5! i. • •g ps provide additionalparkingfor t , a: .14101 1e 41tax"Gear " �-R it y 7 ,,,, { rx i f }-' .�tat . 'f�, i f", eae�'' :- t �' �$a., i tasr�' ta:� t' ,,, , „:„,,,,,-,-,,,,,:,,,,,,,....„,,74,,,,, .,,,,,,,,,,uktp,,..„..„,„„:,,c,,,,g,,,,,„,,,:,,,,-„,„,,,:,,,„ ,-,,,:.,,,:„:„:„,,i„,-..„,...„,,,,„,„,;,,,„,,,„, ,,,, ...„,,,,,,,,,,,,,..„,„,,,,„,„,„,,,,,,,,,„,„,„„,„,„,„„,„,,,,„„.„,,,,,,„„.„,,,,,,,„:„,,,,,„:,-,,„„,,, ,„ downtown visitors . ,„.,,,,,„„,,,.:„„:„,.....,,,,,,..„„,,,,„..„,„:„:„,,,,,,-,, :,:,„,„,,, „,„,'_,,,:,`-',',.::;-.-k,... .---k0 i5 , t ; , � „ „,,,,,„„:„.„,,,,,,,,,i,-,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„„:,,,,,,,:,,,,, 0 Opportunitytocreatenewtax r:� � „„,,,,.,,,,,,,,....„,,,,,„,„„„e„,,,,,,,,„„„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,„,,,,,,,„,,,„,,,,,„,,,,,,-„,r,,,,,,,,„„,,,,.,,,,.„.,„,„,,,,,,:„,,,,,,,, � , � Y ,,,, ?tr m fir! r.;. n 5'.., Sew r & 1 ,,.., ,,,, ,.„,,,,,,„ revenues from downtown , �� . ,,,, development . r , y,s .„,r,i,:..,-.s. ,„ ,,,,,,,: , ,,,,,., z .„4„..... 1— Community benefits 1 43 New facilities will ensure that in the event of an earthquake city 1 staff will be safe and residents will still be able to access essential 43 government services. Provides better safety, security, and training and operations 1 space for Tigard PD, leading to continued improvements in emergency response and efficiency. 1 43 gti fr .f. z r- Long-Term Benefits Johnson Economics found the CFC project to be the preferred option evaluated 2020 Feasibility over a 20-year period . The project is likely to result in : Assessment Findings:, • Building the new • Lowest net overall cost of space facility creates Better urban design solution in downtown Tigard additional revenues totaling over $24 • More intensive utilization of urban land million over the next New property tax revenues from released sites 2C? years, 3 • Additional development in the downtown core (e.g., coffee, shopping, restaurants, etc. ) z Jr, } s9r 40 What are the next steps . .43 .43 r � 1— Upcoming activities ii „,,,,,,,,,1 1 2 q 9 Jan. 2021 Spring 2021 Summer-Fall 2021 9 May 2022 9 Ongoing Provide update to City a Design development of s Continued site and : Target date for potential 9 Public communications n i Council on the feasibility i site and building design i building design i construction of new Public i and engagement of the project and confirm i options for new City Hall i development for new City i Works building $ € their continued support ; and Public Works sites h Hall and Public Works I s sites i 9 2 i i E 9 0 9 i i i i E City Council receives the g e i final feasibility report and n i i decides whether to move 0 Visioning and preliminary i forward with a general Potential vote on ; Target date for project ° design for new City Hall and E obligation bond for the i continuation of general construction for new city Public Works sites i project. i obligation bonds a hall 2 1 o Winter 2021 June 2021 Nov. 2021 Summer 2023 pment , r... potential future redevelo yr . o-`�i ur_- m - 'Y x "i3 r l 'Yx 'Y r3 { .y'Yas } r, 7 ky v,.,. '- „„ ax + . s 'v _F O xy.,` 'a''�. _z,, ` '::' , " -. t ,b,„,.s % ,,it --. .,- t. .,., , ,.„. If CFC project is a roved the citNI *� ''-Y }, ';044,1 4 ,,-,11; - 1a *.,._- ,, ,,, .,... would hold a master planning T4 a " , 3 vy t dk tae process in future years. {yk { � The process would includeNI ,4 ' �;14 �sNI � - 14 , opportunities forpublic input on the a' u f � % r � � .. p p p It a p ' ;�+ ,� � yN,� ,%,v t 7-,-4,4A-4-4-44t. `-3 ;s'_- % : .y am � vision for redeveloNI pment. £ 1 T ,rr? xu � - ` NI / �,� ani ' + g ��n * Affordable housing is the city s $ � y} �h� t i� a } } ?, t7 a von priority for an inclusive and walkable Yp a,.} „ r,,,,,,,„),..„,,,,,;„,,,,,t,,,,„„0„,,,,,40,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, S• ' � #�? ,, , Y ,, -rte downtown �_--__.._.� < . - _ - < .� _--__ r- Activities to date t„,„ Held kick-off meeting with city staff and consultant team Conducted interviews with city staff and community stakeholders • Focus group meeting with Tigard business leaders and downtown interests Developed research report of key findings Developed strategic communications and engagement plan Beginning early engagement by briefing Tigard advisory committees Developing communications and outreach tools Upcoming opportunities ; > T y , ; ,,, a t 7 t11, 7 4 + '1,.'''''f.' 1,r �� i � 'Y L r r ' r R �'k-'-',;.p.,r - F 7 y ' 1� tiff's t�`S +hr`9p 45 a~;° r'F'''", �,l' �xf f } S t t ti t r ,,—,-,�:r . t �' +'t t k t r.r St �^ t , ,t�',i f Wewant hear m you ! Thewill ' ° � ' ',$ 7� } . , � �V'� a t to ea o city g �� ii � � �x , �- � 1� q �� � { �, c 7 i Y ''=,2''''. 4 ti ;. `-`E. ' T 'h 7 S xr z t t �� ?� s' a - `fit� r r P ems'+ g„�'�''"fr' z-'`+ e listen to community voices to plan a - z .�� � � Y � � , � . x �� -',,,,„:q.-c,,,,..,, b ,r . 11, 1 ;}1 d ts,t� '' d fr ' ,di' 5 t solution that works for Tigard. j : - 43 3 5 ' ,. e t r i +x ,' - �$k , + ..'„,T P7. ± • Beginning in mid-January outreach and s s 7 l engagement will include : ` � � ,, >t � r � �� � 1 64 fix ; F >..ITT.0 q 7 2'p b ` b 'dd ,'b "M1 'f''-4 a.; • Community input/questionnaire hosted }j online at Yourli and engagement site ; ' �Aj ' ' - 0 ` r3 x r g „,,TiM1 • Project website ' ” . zt} , 4 � r; 4t "�?s. r ' es -" ft ..:, ',tY .,e.r: r ..t ?.,i,„ ,,,,, bite, g • City communications: social media, podcast, g media, e-newsletter, etc. • Direct outreach and briefings (virtual, } is � yam. ��5