Loading...
City Council Packet - 08/18/2020 City of Tigard Tigard Workshop Meeting—Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING DATE AND TIME: August 18,2020 - 6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: Virtual meeting with attendees participating remotely Times noted are estimated. PUBLIC NOTICE.In accordance with the City of Tigard's Emergency Declaration related to COVID-19 and Governor Brown's Executive Order 20-16, this will be a virtual meeting where Council and staff will participate remotely. There will be no in-person,verbal public testimony during this meeting. How to comment: •Written public comment may be submitted electronically at www.tigard-or.gov/Comments. All comments must be submitted before 4:30 p.m. the day of the meeting. VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE: http://www.tigard-or.gov/city hall/councilmeeting.php Workshop meetings are cablecast on Tualatin Valley Community TV as follows: Replay Schedule for Tigard City Council Workshop Meetings-Channel 28 •Every Sunday at 12 a.m. •Every Monday at 1 p.m. •Every Wednesday at 2 p.m. •Every Thursday at 12 p.m. •Every Friday at 10:30 a.m. SEE ATTACHED AGENDA lig City of Tigard Tigard Workshop Meeting—Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING DATE AND TIME: August 18, 2020 - 6:30 p.m. MEETING LOCATION: Virtual meeting with attendees participating remotely 6:30 PM 1. WORKSHOP MEETING A. Call to Order- City Council and Town Center Development Agency B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. PUBLIC COMMENT - A summary of written public comment received by 4:30 p.m.on the meeting day will be given. 3. RECEIVE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN UPDATE 6:35 estimated time 4. RECEIVE UPDATE ON SW ASCENSION DRIVE TRAFFIC ISSUES 7:05 p.m. estimated time 5. RECEIVE BRIEFING ON 1-205 TOLLING PROGRAM 7:35 p.m. estimated time 6. TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY- RECEIVE CITY CENTER FUTURES PROJECT UPDATE 8:20 p.m. estimated time 7. RECEIVE PARKS MASTER PLAN UPDATE 8:50 p.m. estimated time 8. NON AGENDA ITEMS 9. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 11. ADJOURNMENT 9:20 p.m. estimated time 111 • TIGARD No Public Testimony was Submitted electronically for the August 18, 2020 Tigard City Council Meeting AIS-4353 3. Workshop Meeting Meeting Date: 08/18/2020 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: Receive Capital Improvement Plan Update Submitted By: Lori Faha, Public Works Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Briefing and update on the status of Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects. This presentation will provide a year-end summary for Fiscal Year 2019/20 and brief introduction to new projects that will start in Fiscal Year 2020/21. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST N/A KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) establishes Tigard's budget and timeline for improvements to city owned and operated public infrastructure over a 6-year period. A CIP project improves or adds value to the City's infrastructure, typically costs $50,000 or more, and has a useful life or extends the useful life of infrastructure for 5 years or more. Public infrastructure systems addressed by the CIP include streets, parks, sanitary sewers, stormwater and domestic water in addition to public buildings and facilities. In most cases, CIP projects are implemented with oversight from the City's Engineering Division. City Engineer Lori Faha will provide a summary report to Council, including the status of active projects. The powerpoint presentation will provide a summary overview of projects status. Copies of individual project status reports for active CIP projects will be delivered to Council in the August 13, 2020 City Council Newsletter packet. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS The CIP for FY2019-20 was adopted on June 11, 2019. The CIP for FY2020/21 was adopted June 16, 2020. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Last CIP briefing to Council at their March 17, 2020 Workshop Meeting. Attachments CIP Update FY20 Year End CIP Memo to Council CITY OF TIGARD Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done lig • TIGARD CapitalImprovement Project Update l FY 2019-20 Year End Summary Tigard City Council Meeting I August 18, 2020 C I T Y O F T I G A R D Project Status O On Target 0 Minor Issues • Major Issues p a Pt 4• 5 j ',=•-:7 111, s'�' `L 3Bh 1 Parks � .� ,� �.� � �,� � � . � �a • • / Streets =,. • r / Water t , f "...44127.1% 1 Sanitary Sewer ��= "" It al Stormwater d,,v '-.„• S Facilitiesf CITY OF TIGARD Status of Parks Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Dirksen Nature Park • Oak Savannah Restoration Final plantings in prep for turnover to Parks • maintenance • Wetland Boardwalk& Moved to FY21, coordinating with Dirksen Walkway parking lot project Tigard Street Heritage Trail , Substantially complete Plaza, Restroom &Art 90% Design complete, permitting underway, Fanno Creek Trail— RFFA Grant increased budget,working through ODOT ROW process issues Plan development nearly complete, working Fanno Creek Trail Amenities on more detailed amenities opportunities at Library CITY OF TIGARD Status of Parks Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE FY20 plan: Parks and trail wayfinding Parks Major Maintenance signage, parkland invasive plants removal, Old Windmill improvements, pave Potso parking, playground equipment replacement Completed conditions assessment, Parks Master Plan demographic analysis, 10-minute walk to parks/trails analysis. Adding scope for more in-depth Recreation program review. Universal Plaza Demolition completed Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Narrowed down feasible routes, preparing for Study Bonita—Tualatin River next round of virtual stakeholder/public input CITY OF TIGARD Status of Streets Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Pavement Management Summer work underway: paving Durham Rd, Program slurry seal Summerfield area, curb ramps along 121st. Scholls/Fanno Creek Trail study, Frewing Pedestrian and Cyclist sidewalk grant match, bike/ped counts, Grant Connections Program & Katherine crossings of Tigard Street, 124 /Ann sidewalk infill, Slow Your Roll signs, Tiedeman at Fanno Creek Trail RRFB Tiedeman Ave Bike Lane & Future traffic study completed, further work 0 Sidewalk delayed to FY22 due to work load Upper Boones Ferry/ Durham Archeological review completed, nearing 60% Adaptive Signals design Commercial Street Sidewalk Substantially complete (Main to Lincoln) Roy Rogers Road County lead, construction underway 121St Ave (Whistlers Lane— County lead through MSTIP program, design Tippitt) sidewalks, bike lanes underway, some delay due to ROW survey and utility relocation issues CITY OF TIGARD Status of Streets Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE 72nd Avenue/Tigard Triangle Complete Study North Dakota Street Bridge Consultant fee negotiation still underway. Replacement ODOT grant. Wall St/Tech Center Drive Contractor selected Connection Traffic Safety Action Plan Report prepared, will be incorporated in Transportation System Plan update Transportation System Plan Consultant selected. Hall Blvd condition Update assessment completed as early action. Some budget increase need identified. Frewing Street Sidewalk Infill Consultant selected, design started. CDBG grant. Survey completed, design underway, Main Street Phase 2 scheduling virtual stakeholder meetings, budget increased Highway 99W Lights IGA approved for defederalization and city management, RFP issued CITY OF TIGARD Status of Water Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Cach Reservoir& Pump Station Selection process for Owner's Representative I - underway Red Rock Creek Waterline Work is being phased to coordinate with Relocation other projects, part complete, part slowed by permitting Canterbury Pump Station Complete Modelling and development of project needs Water Master Plan underway, some delay to incorporate urban growth expansion area Fonner St/121st Ave Valve & Design underway, in coordination with 121st Piping Improvements Ave project Aquifer Storage& Recovery Condition assessment and preliminary design Wells 2 & 3 report completed Greenfield Emergency Repair Completed under budget CITY OF TIGARD Status of Sanitary Sewer Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Sanitary Sewer Major Repairing/lining sewers, manholes1 Maintenance East Fork Derry Dell Creek Contractor selected, construction summer — 2020 Fanno Creek Sanitary Siphon Contractor selected, construction summer Repair 2020 Downtown Sanitary Sewer Line Contractor selected, construction fall 2020 at contractor's request Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Project delayed to await acquisition and Update implementation of new asset management • system CITY OF TIGARD Status of Stormwater Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Fanno Creek Slope Stabilization Complete • � —Arthur Court Stormwater Major Maintenance Multiple pipe, culvert and stream system • • repairs 124th Avenue/Ann Court Culvert Complete Replacement Design complete, permitting underway, Frewing Stormline Replace scope and budget increased for failing culvert replacement, construction fall 2020 Water Quality Facility Rehab Condition assessments for facilities complete, Program developing priorities, public works staff completed several rehab projects Tigard Triangle Stormwater Plan CWS lead, analysis complete, draft plan development underway Commercial Street Stormwater Combined with Main Street project, design Facility underway CITY OF TIGARD Status of Other Projects PROJECT NOTES BUDGET SCHEDULE Americans with Disabilities Act Council adopted plan. Staff training Transition Plan completed, developing tracking tools. • Public Works Facility and Yard Per Council direction Feb 18, site options • (planning) discovery underway CITY OF TIGARD Key Projects i n FY21 SYSTEM TOTAL FINISH START OF NOTE PARKS 11p • Significant cost increase for Fanno Creek Trail • Cook Park in-fields • Major maintenance to add focus on ADA needs • Universal Plaza STREETS 17 5 4 • Main St cost increase • New programs for ADA, major maintenance, fiber • Tigard St Bridge design • Approx 1/3 of streets CIP funds for bike/ped WATER 12 5 2 • ASR improvements • Cach Reservoir Alternative Delivery Method • Risk/Resilience Plan SEWER 4 3 - • Siphon replacement at Fanno Creek • East Fork Derry Dell Creek construction STORM 8 4 2 • Kruger Creek Stabilization design • Complete Tigard Triangle Stormwater Plan FACILITIES 3 2 1 • PW Facility Siting • Complete remodeling of existing facilities CITY OF TIGARD Tigard Street Heritage Trail Mural Z . "; h' NIII.- ...._ .— ._-----Nbi . — ! ilk *.717N N It .. - ---*,...----\-1"------. J _ 6 . . 1 - � CITY OF TIGARD Grant Ave at Tigard Street ,,-.- 1 9 r� ryj[�Y N • x t , _ JJ yr '-t7 'I . iii � ,,re _ 1"214.---4 4 _ Tye 1. P .,'. 6. r z1 • i / 4.«• 3 �� y7P' Vw �Jj +1 '�=t, r--- ..: fes I y— � ' I � • L. —__.'' �y$44 y�- rya • _ ..� 31 r •.. _ .;r - - _ - C I T Y O F T I G A R D Durham Road Grind and Pave Night Work fi 5Y, f 00- . .+'mss � 11/$1# LO MAP " r C I T Y O F TIGARD Summerfield Slurry Seal — Keeping Golf Cart 191 • Path Open 1 '' fir, _� • :`- . -• f �4 T fir- ..t - —__.. ` i , f y Q i; 4 P' - - - b6� tt� �- - a a4 ° -�'zr f' tty .,:...,,,s4',•;;,44',, ,,,'..;1-',-?!.;"..-' el� p , L!� cFh ' ryT , � . ' Xvmoi jyf' : r fi-n r —f � s ° s CITY OF TIGARD „ . . East Fork Derry Dell Creek — Fish Salvage Prior to Construction ...„,,.... .,- ,..., -,_.. „....-,,,,4,4- .. ,4: ----4,--- 1 . ,,,,,,,14,to 1..„..,„„.,-, , . -_,,.4...„.._=t,..„, .t. ., A., __________—_____ sm.. .• - , ."• %,', Y'''' 4 f 'Ir C C. \i4 I 1 • I=MERE11.1111111111 Sculpin fish and lamprey! ICity of Tigard TIGARD Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor & City Council From: Lori Faha, P.E., City Engineer Re: Supplemental Information for August 18, 2020 Council Workshop Session Briefing on Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Projects Date: August 13, 2020 Attached please find copies of the June 2020 status reports for all FY2019-20 CIP projects managed by Engineering. These reports summarize work, budget and schedule status for each project. The reports support the CIP status report that will be presented to Council at the August 18 Workshop Session. Enclosure FACILITIES Project Name: Public Works Facility and Yard Project Manager: Rob Murchison/Brian Rager Project Number: 91021 Actuals as of: 8/5/2020 TIGARD This project will produce the planning, design and construction documents and construct a new Public Works Facility Description and Yard. Project timing will be coordinated with the"All-In-One Plus" City Facilities project. Budget 0 Minor Issue * SEI Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts Scope 0 Minor Issue Total Project Budget: $2,145,000 Status: Planning Total Project $17,209 External $2,100,000 $4,482 Internal ' Project Budget FY 2019/20 $17,209 External $735,000 $- Internal $25,000 Total Project%Spent: 1% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 5% Project Schedule • Schedule adjustment occurring based on coordination with citywide"All-In-One"project to reflect request to accelerate PW building project. • Project charter created. Snapshot of Work • Negotiating scope and fee with the architect. The scope currently being negotiated will assist the city in developing a list and Schedule Progress of potential sites,narrow the list based on PW facility criteria,produce a budget level cost estimate,and recommend a project delivery method. LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Develop an overall project schedule and begin to develop a strategy Items • The current project budget does not include enough funds to purchase property and construct a new facility. Risks/Issues • SW Corridor light rail project and/or city civic center projects may establish need and schedule for PW site move. • The number of potential sites and available sites for sell are limited within the city limits. • Council approved the concept of construction of a new Public Works Facility by July 2023. Changes • City contracted with Scott Edwards Associates to provide professional services. PARKS Dirksen Nature Park-Oak Savanna Restoration Project Name: Project Manager: Carla Staedter Project Number: 92016-02 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD A nine acre area of Dirksen Nature Park houses some remnant Oregon white oak populations.This area is being restored back to a native oak savanna to be used for education and enjoyment by the public.The project will remove non-native trees,shrubs and Description grasses.Native grasses and wildflowers will be planted along with additional oak trees and a native shrub hedge around the savanna.A walking trail through the savanna will be lined on each side with rustic buck and pole fencing made from trees taken down as part of the restoration. Budget • On Target * Ash Creek Forest Mgmt.—6/30/19 Schedule • On Target Contracts Scope • On Target Total Project Budget: $241,000 Status: Substantially Complete Total Project $205,239 External $206,500 $24,252 Internal $34,500 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $7,020 External $1,676 Internal $10,000 Total Project%Spent: 95% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 98% 1) Monitor Site Summer/Fall 2018 Spray if Needed. 4)Camas Celebration Grand Opening May 2019. Project Schedule 2) Additional bulb planting—Oct-Dec.2018. 5)Control Cattle Graze end of May 2019. 3) Oak Planting Oct.18 to March 19. Snapshot of Work • Transition Site to PW Operations. and Schedule • Final weed spray completed Progress LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Exploring opportunities with Ash Creek Forest Management to continue to provide treatment within the Oak Savanna for Items Parks division long term maintenance. • Long-term management of Oak Savanna requires grazing or burning. Most of the savanna at Dirksen is wet meadow. If grazing is chosen,need to get DSL/CWS approval to have animals in a wetland. If burning is used,need to have approval Risks/Issues and support of TVFR. • Operations staff need to be updated and educated about the long-term care of the oak savanna. They may need an annual budget to contract with a native area restoration company for an additional 5 years to ensure a strongly established savanna. • Extra seeding and weed removal of the area between Tigard Street and the edge of the savanna will be required as an Changes interim solution until the paved trail and parking construction. PARKS i , Project Name: Dirksen Nature Park—Wetland Boardwalk and Walkway Project Manager: Jeff Peck Project Number: 92016-13 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 The elevated wetland boardwalk will be centrally-located in the park extending from the Fanno Greenway Trail into Description the Fanno Greenway floodplain.The boardwalk surface will consist of galvanized steel grating.The walkway will be an 8-foot-wide hard surface pathway from Summer Creek Bridge at Fowler Middle School to the Fanno Greenway Trail. Budget • On Target Schedule 0 Minor Issue IGA/Contracts Scope • On Target Total Project Budget: $405,000 Status: Design Total Project $- External $371,000 $9,890 Internal $34,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $- External $371,000 $9,890 Internal $34,000 Total Project%Spent: 2% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 2% • Scope development—November 2019. Project Schedule • Boardwalk Design— moved to FY21 to coordinate with Off-Street parking lot project. • Concrete pathway construction—Fall 2020. Snapshot of Work • RFP Preparation(draft)for boardwalk. and Schedule Progress LOOK AHEAD • Complete Erosion and Sediment Control plans for phased work. Upcoming Work • Adjust scope of work to couple boardwalk fabrication and construction with off-street parking lot project. Items • Bid and construct concrete pathway from Fowler to Fanno Creek Trail. Risks/Issues • Moved construction out one year to build the off-street parking lot and boardwalk as one project. • • Separate the concrete pathway improvements from the boardwalk construction. Changes • Schedule and budget adjustment to move boardwalk timing to coordinate with parking lot project. PARKS Project Name: Tigard Street Heritage Trail and Public Space Project Manager: Jeff Peck/Schuyler Warren • ■ Project Number: 92034 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD The city has signed a lease for the use of the inactive railroad corridor from Tiedeman Avenue to Main Street.The City was awarded a Connect Oregon VI Grant and Washington County MSTIP funding to assist with the development of a 3/4 mile, 12'wide Description multi-use pathway with amenities including fencing,lighting,landscape,and art features. A public open space will be created adjacent to Main Street and the Tigard Chamber of Commerce building. This project is related to LQC 98009 which used porous paving material to create a temporary pathway in advance of the full project. Budget 0 Minor Issue * Alta—10/25/18 * Lee Contractors-10/31/19 Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts * Pacific Habitat—1/31/19 * Carlson Testing- Scope Q Minor Issue * Applied Professional Svs.- * Ware-Ever Pavement- Total Project Budget: $474757000$1,937,000 Status: Complete City of Tigard Budget: $295,000 Total Project $1,572,113 External $1,753,500 $260,158 Internal $183,500 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $1,290,056 External $835,000 $98,767 Internal Q1$50,000$40,000 Total Project%Spent: 95% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 100% Project Schedule 1) Project Closeout with ODOT—August 2020 Snapshot of Work • Construction punch list completed and Schedule Progress LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Invoicing and Project Closeout. Items Risks/Issues • Project budget updated in FY19 budget reflecting updated cost estimate. • Construction budget moved to FY20,higher than budgeted construction costs included in FY20 Q1 budget request. Changes • Requested$40k additional funding to complete the project work. • Fog Seal and restriping of parking lot moved to a specialized contractor. PARKS ■ Project Name: Heritage Trail Plaza Restroom Project Manager: Jeff Peck • Project Number: 92034-01 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD This project will construct a public restroom as part of the Tigard Street Heritage Trail/Rotary Plaza. Public restrooms Description in public gathering spaces are an identified Public Facility Project in the City Center Urban Renewal Plan. Budget 0 Minor Issue * Romtec,Inc. Schedule • On Target Contracts Scope On Target Total Project Budget: $166,000$238,000 Status: Complete ' Total Project $209,285 $155,500 External Q1$233,500 $19,728 Internal $10,500 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $209,285 $4--307-500 3 External Q1$233,500 $15,362 Internal $5,000 Total Project%Spent: 94% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 85% 1) Contractors work finalized on 5/2/2020. Project Schedule Snapshot of Work • Restroom Work complete. and Schedule • Tigard Rotary clock installed,including electrical components in restroom facility. Progress LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Items • Price increase for 2019 double stall model. Negotiated acquisition for non-standard restroom with Romtec. Risks/Issues • Price to install the restroom exceeded construction estimate. Changes • Budget increased in Q1. PARKS •Project Name: Fanno Creek Trail Connection(RFFA) Project Manager: Carla Staedter/Zach Morris Project Number: 92046 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD This project constructs four segments of the Fanno Creek Trail.Segment 1-Grant Avenue to Woodard Park,Segment 2-Ash Description Avenue to Hall Boulevard,Segment 3-City Library to Milton Court,Segment 4-85th Avenue(south of Durham Road)to the Tualatin River. The Regional Flexible Funds Grant is federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality(CMAQ)dollars. Budget Major Issue * Ash Creek Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts Scope 0 Minor Issue Total Project Budget: $6,000,000$6,187,000 Status: Design City of Tigard Budget: $1,535,500 Total Project $146,934 External $1,154,500 $315,853 Internal $381,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $1,083 External $260,000 $138,175 Internal $75,000 Total Project%Spent: 30% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 50% (ODOT is paid in lump sum payments so 30%does not reflect upcoming payments.Project has exceeded ODOT funding and Tigard will be paying for all overruns moving forward.) 1) Design team selected—Feb 2016. 3) 90%Design(round 2)July 2020 Project Schedule 2) Design Started—Nov 2017. 4) Easement Acquisition Fall 2020. 5) Construction—2021 thru 2022. • 90%Plans revision underway. Snapshot of Work • Preparing City Land Use Application and Schedule • Preparing Environmental Permits. Progress • Assessment of Existing and Needed Easement LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Start Official ODOT Easement Process Items • Finalize environmental and Land Use permits for submittal. • Extended duration of consultant scope and fee negotiations by ODOT has required more city staff coordination time • FHWA required a change to the project to comply with their standards for multi-use trails.Trails are now 12-feet with 2- Risks/Issues foot shoulder,bridges are now 14-feet wide. This will add significant cost to project but no additional grant funding. • Project costs have exceeded the amount that ODOT/FHWA will provide under grant. All budget overruns will be the responsibility of Tigard. • If CWS chooses not to donate trail easement project costs could rise again. • The Ash Avenue to City Hall segment will get rehabilitated in its existing location in lieu of building new trail along the Changes alignment identified in the Fanno Creek Park Master Plan. This is required to bring project closer to budget and to lower environmental impacts. • An increase in project budget is included in FY21 budget to cover substantial rise in construction budget at 90%. 11111 Project Name: Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan Project Manager: Lori Faha Project Number: 92055 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD The city must complete an up-to-date Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)Transition Plan. The ADA Transition Plan will focus primarily on accessibility and barrier removal needs in the city transportation,parks,and facilities(buildings)system. The city has Description previously completed accessibility and condition inventories of some parts of these systems. This data will be utilized in this effort. The Plan will also integrate and coordinate the schedule of needed improvements with ongoing and planned projects such as the Pavement Management Program. Budget • On Target * MIG Schedule • On Target Contracts Scope • On Target Total Project Budget: $260,000 Status: Complete Total Project $220,117 External $222,000 $28,946 Internal $38,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $20,136 External $20,000 $- Internal $10,000 Total Project%Spent: 96% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 95% 1) Kickoff meeting Feb.2018. 2) Facility&Parks Evals March-July 2018. 3) ROW Evals April-Sept.2018. Project Schedule 4) City Policies&Standards Eval March-June 2018. 5) Citizen Focus Group Meetings April 2018,Dec.2018,Spring Summer 2019. 6) Draft Plan Oct.2018—Spring 2019. 7) Final Plan for Council-Spring.Fall 2019. Snapshot of Work • Council adopted Plan Dec 3. and Schedule • 4 virtual staff training workshops,May 14&28. Progress • Working on creating implementation tracking and mapping tools. LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Project close-out. Items Risks/Issues • An up-to-date ADA Transition Plan is needed ASAP to comply with regulations and provide legal coverage. • Consultant fees were somewhat larger than budget after negotiating needed scope elements—project budget increase Changes for consultant fees and additional staff time needed to manage longer project schedule were approved by Council in FY19 CIP budget,reflected above. • Carry-forward of unused budget from prior fiscal year approved in the Q1—Oct.2018. PARKS n Project Name: Park System Master Plan Update Project Manager: Carla/Martin McKnight Project Number: 92056 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD The Park System Master Plan Update will examine existing recreational facilities, programs,and services. Community involvement and public input will be a critical component of the process that will help determine the current and Description future parks and recreation service levels.The updated plan will prioritize the needs and desires for upgrading and creating new facilities and services. The plan will focus on developing areas of Tigard such as River Terrace and the Tigard Triangle in addition to existing parks and recreation services. Budget On Target * MIG Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts Scope • On Target Total Project Budget: $270,000 Status: Planning Total Project $65,026 External $230,000 $26,632 Internal $40,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $62,938 External $228,000 $22,994 Internal $36,000 Total Project%Spent: 34% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete:35% 1) Project Scoping/Chartering—April 2018. 2) Consultant Selection—August-September.2019. 3) Data Collection/Existing conditions-Oct-Dec.2019. Project Schedule 4) Public Input/Needs Assessment--January-August 2020(Input methodologies changed to respond to Covid 19). 5) Public Input/Review—July-September 2020. 6) Draft Parks Master Plan Update-December 2020 7) Final Parks Master Plan Update February/March 2021. 8) PRAB&Council Adoption—Spring 2021. • Release web-based survey 1 to community in English and Spanish in July 2020. Snapshot of Work • Implement multiple public outreach efforts during social distancing to ensure solid rate of response.i.e.banners at and Schedule Progress parks/trails,articles in papers,web-based outreach,etc. • Complete 10-minute walk assessment and gap analysis. LOOK AHEAD • Complete public outreach survey(English/Spanish)and implement steps to keep survey outreach alive. Upcoming Work • Staff/Council/PRAB input collection. Items • Recreation program assessment. Risks/Issues • Key staff positions are filled with interim workers. Input of new Parks and Recreation manager could extend project. • Project schedule delayed due to staff workload and key staff retirement. Expected completion date now Spring 2021. • FY19 Q1 increased budget to add scope for condition assessment Changes • Scope added for in-depth assessment of recreation program and where the program is best housed in Tigard's organization . PARKS Project Name: Fanno Creek Trail Amenities Project Manager: Carla Staedter 11111 Project Number: 92057 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD This is a companion project to#92046,which uses Federal funds to construct new and rebuilt sections of the Fanno Description Creek Trail. This locally funded project will add amenities along the new trail sections such as interpretive signage, overlooks, benches and artwork to enhance the experience of trail users. Budget 0 On Target * GreenWorks- Schedule 0 On Target Contracts Scope 0 On Target Total Project Budget: $730,000 Status: Design Total Project $15,306 External $650,000 $18,885 Internal $80,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $2,755 External $67,000 $13,776 Internal $35,000 Total Project%Spent: 5% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 10% 1) Scoping/Charter Development Feb.2019. 2) On-call Consultant Selection March 2019. Project Schedule 3) Present Preliminary Concepts to Public at Camas Festival April 27,2019. 4) Master Planning April 2019 to September 2019. 5) Closer Look at Library as Trail Amenity June 2020. 6) Individual Amenity Implementation TBD. Snapshot of Work • Preliminary Report of Amenities Developed. and Schedule • Met with Library to discuss potential amenities to support Library vision for outside spaces. Progress • Preliminary meeting with the storyteller to plan for how to tell Tigard story in trail and interpretive elements. LOOK AHEAD • Work with story teller to finalize a'story'of and along the trail that will guide interpretation and wayfinding elements. Upcoming Work (On hold difficult task without meeting in group.) Items • Meet with Library staff to incorporate new ideas. Risks/Issues • Amenities implementation may be reduced if Fanno Creek Trail Connections Project comes in over budget and funding needs to be taken from this project to cover costs. Changes • Adding scope to project to do a more in-depth look at the library site as a trail amenity and destination. PARKS Project Name: Fanno Creek Trail Crossing at Scholls Ferry Road Project Manager: Zach Morris 111 • Project Number: 92060 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD This project will hire a consultant to evaluate alternatives for an at-grade crossing of the Fanno Creek Trail at Scholls Ferry Road. The existing trail goes beneath the roadway bridge and is frequently flooded. The study will produce Description concept-level data that identifies a preferred alternative and sufficient information to use as supporting documentation in seeking grant funding for the final design and construction of the preferred option. Budget 0 Minor Issue * Kittelson(crossing study) Schedule 0 Minor Issue IGA/Contracts * 5-way IGA(study funding) Scope • On Target Total Project Budget: $82,500 Status: Planning City of Tigard Project Cost:$22,500 Total Project $36,015 Project Budget External $75,000 $23,813 Internal $22,500 Total Project%Spent: 73% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 90% • August 2019—begin study. • June 2020—complete study. Project Schedule • July 2020—virtual project open house to share preferred alternative. • August 2020—evaluate community feedback received during virtual project open house. • Executed 5-way IGA for funding the study with Beaverton,CWS,THPRD,and Washington County. Snapshot of Work • Had a presence at the Fanno Creek Trail open house on 11/20/19. and Schedule • Partnering agencies concurred a mid-block at-grade crossing was the preferred alternative,study report finalized. Progress • Prepared virtual project open house webpage and materials for going"live"on 7/1/20. LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Virtual project open house survey open 7/1-7/31/20. Upon closing survey,prepare engagement report and evaluate Items community feedback. • Internal staff time has exceeded budgeted amount due to general demand of coordinating a 5-agency partner team, Risks/Issues along with preparing for and canceling the in-person project open house in the spring of 2020 and shifting to a virtual platform. Changes • Project was to be completed originally in FY19/20 but will wrap up in early FY20/21. STORMWATER Project Name: Fanno Creek Slope Stabilization(Arthur Court) Project Manager: Andy Newbury 111111 Project Number: 93009 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD Sanitary sewer pipe and a section of Fanno Creek Trail are being threatened by erosion on the outside bend of Fanno Creek. A section of the bank along Fanno Creek near Arthur Court has eroded due to high water levels. This is threatening a sanitary sewer Description main and a portion of the Fanno Creek Trail. The project will restore the section of eroding bank and divert high flows from the impacted areas. Budget 0 Minor Issue * AMEC—Closed * Shannon&Wilson—6/30/18 Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts * Morgan Holen * Henderson,LLC Scope 0 Minor Issue * Integrity Tree—Closed * Bush Engineering- Total Project Budget: $1,351,500 Status:Substantially Complete Total Project $1,072,626 External $1,263,500 $142,216 Internal $88,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $883,109 External $1,090,000 $50,777 Internal ■ $25,000 Total Project%Spent: 90% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 99% 1) 50%design—Dec.2017 September 2018. 5) Bid and award—May 2018 Spring 2019. 2) 75%design—Jan.2018 November 2018. 6) Begin construction—Junc 2018 June 2019. Project Schedule 3) Final design—Fcb.2018 March 2019. 7) End construction—August 2018 October 2019. 4) Permitting—Apr.2018 March 2019. Snapshot of Work and Schedule Progress • Construction is complete other than 2-year plant warranty period. Upcoming Work Items Risks/Issues • Continued streambank erosion may occur with potential impacts to the Fanno Creek Trail and a sanitary sewer line near the trail at risk until the project is completed. • Due to meetings with the agencies and permitting timelines,construction of this project will occur in the summer of Changes 2019. • Project scope and budget increased to address larger bank erosion zone,FY19. Project Name: East Fork Derry Dell Creek(Viewmont Ct to Fairhaven Way) Project Manager: Carla Staedter Project Number: 93057 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD Erosion of the East Fork of Derry Dell Creek has resulted in exposed manholes and laterals of the adjacent sanitary sewer system Description from approximately Viewmont Court to Fairhaven Way adjacent to 110th Avenue. The incised stream areas will be brought back up to previous stream elevations to provide protection to the sanitary sewer system. Project will include new stream cross sections and the insertion of wood logs and bank treatment. Budget • On Target * OTAK—1/31/19 Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts * Pacific Habitat Scope • On Target * Willamette Cultural Resources Total Project Budget: $899,500 Status:Design Total Project $106,331 External $820,500 $59,728 Internal $79,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $6,981 External $596,500 $27,896 Internal $39,000 Total Project%Spent: 18% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated Complete:30% 1) Design and permit preparation November 15,2018. Project Schedule 2) Submit Environmental Permitting December—March 2019. 3) On-call Contractor Selection March 2020(for summer 2020 construction bid early for pricing advantage). 4) Outreach to neighbors for native plant installation along creek April 2020—July-September 2020. • 100%design completed and permits submitted. Snapshot of Work • Cultural Resources Report Completed. and Schedule • Fish Salvage Contract request sent out. Progress • Met with Tualatin Soil and Water Conservation District to request partnership project for planting on neighbors'lots. • Project Bidding Completed LOOK AHEAD • Continue outreach to streamside landowners. Upcoming Work • Award Construction Contract for Streambed Stabilization Items • Secure Planting Contractor for Fall. Risks/Issues • • Project scaled back to reflect changes in site conditions as a result of past private landowner stream restoration efforts. Changes Light touch grade control is all that will be required in lower reaches of the creek. While creek bed below the Gaarde Culvert will require stream channel reconstruction. These site changes may cut the cost of the project in half. • Cultural Resources study requires a 30-day comment period so construction must be moved to summer 2020. SANITARY SEWEIIII Project Name: Fanno Creek Sanitary Siphon Repair Project Manager: Andy Newbury Project Number: 93058 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD An existing sanitary sewer line and manhole are exposed due to bank erosion along Fanno Creek. This project will use engineered Description structures to stabilize the bank and protect the exposed sewer line. The exposed siphon within Fanno Creek will be removed and the manholes that are near the eroded bank will be moved further away. New sewer siphon lines will be placed by directional drilling. Budget • On Target * AKS Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts * GT Excavating Scope • On Target Total Project Budget: $422,500 Status: Construction Total Project $67,795 External $391,500 $19,153 Internal $31,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $6,140 External $328,000 $7,703 Internal . $12,000 Total Project%Spent: 21% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 20% 1) 30%design—Dec.2017. 5) Bid and award—June 2020. 2) 60%design—Jan.2018. 6) Begin construction—July 2020. Project Schedule 3) Final design—Feb.2018. 7) End construction—September 2020. 4) Permitting—Apr.2018 July 2018. Snapshot of Work • Advertised invitation to bid. and Schedule • Awarded construction contract to GT Excavating. Progress LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Begin construction. Items • Continued streambank erosion may occur with potential impacts to an existing sanitary sewer manhole and sewer line in Risks/Issues and adjacent to Fanno Creek. • Easement acquisition issues caused 1-year construction delay. Changes • The project scope has changed. The exposed siphon within Fanno Creek will be removed and the manholes that are near the eroded bank will be moved further away. New lines will be placed by directional drilling. SANITARY SEW Downtown SanitarySewer Line Project Project Name: 1 Project Manager: Andy Newbury Project Number: 93059 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD This project will rehabilitate approximately 2,360 linear feet of sanitary sewer line in Pacific Highway from Hall Description Boulevard to Main Street and in Main Street from Pacific Highway to Commercial Street.A cured-in-place-pipe(CIPP) trenchless method will be used to minimize traffic disruption. Budget 0 On Target * Century West- Schedule 0 On Target IGA/Contracts * Insituform- Scope 0 On Target Total Project Budget: $355,000 Status: Construction Total Project $15,854 External $320,000 $11,973 Internal $35,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $15,854 External $55,000 $11,973 Internal $20,000 Total Project%Spent: 8% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete:15% 1) 30%design—November 2019. 5) Bid and award—April 2020 May 2020. Project Schedule 2) 60%design—December 2019. 6) Begin construction—May 2020 November 2020. 3) Final design—February 2020. 7) End construction—June 2020 November 2020. 4) Permitting—March 2020. Snapshot of Work • Advertised invitation to bid. and Schedule • Awarded construction contract to Insituform. Progress AD Upcoming Work • Construction to begin in early November due to contractor schedule. Items Risks/Issues • Changes • SANITARY SEW Project Name: Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Update Project Manager: Andy Newbury Project Number: 93060 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD A Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Update will be prepared with a primary focus on existing system conditions.The plan Description will assess, prioritize and provide budget level cost estimates for existing and projected future pipe system capital repair and replacement needs. Budget • On Target Schedule • Major Issue IGA/Contracts Scope • On Target Total Project Budget: $130,000 Status: Delayed Total Project $- External $110,000 $- Internal $20,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $- External $110,000 $- Internal $20,000 Total Project%Spent: % Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: % • Project on hold. Project Schedule 1) Research&Data Collection. 2) First Draft Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Update for Asset Conditions. 3) Final Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Update. Snapshot of Work • Project delayed until at least FY22 to await supplemental of new Asset Management software to be able to more readily and Schedule assess system condition information. Progress I Upcoming Work • Project on hold,awaiting implementation of new Asset Management System to allow ready access to system condition Items reporting data to inform master planning. • Risks/Issues Changes • Project placed on hold until FY22. Public Works will be implementing a new asset management software program that will be used to complete the sanitary sewer master plan update. STORMWATER Project Name: 124th Ave/Ann Court Culvert Replacement Project Manager: Andy Newbury ■ Project Number: 94038 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD An existing 30"storm culvert is failing. It is undersized and erosion is threatening the road crossing. During heavy rain events, stormwater will flow onto 124th Avenue. This project will replace approximately 85 lineal feet of 30"stormline with an Description approximate 60"wide box culvert. A sidewalk gap in 124thwill also be completed using funds from#95027 Pedestrian and Cyclist Connections Program. Budget 0 Minor Issue * Century West—6/30/18 Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts * Applied Professional- Scope • On Target * Carlson Testing- Total Project Budget: $514000$593,000 Status: Complete Total Project $514,728 External $553,000 $80,034 Internal $40,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $435,204 External $473,000 $53,642 Internal $12,000 Total Project%Spent: 100% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 100% 1) 30%design—Dec.2017. 5) Bid and award—May 2018 March 2019. 2) 60%design—Jan.2018. 6) Begin construction—June 2018 July 2019. Project Schedule 3) Final design—Feb.2018 Spring 2019. 7) End construction—August 2018 October 2019. 4) Permitting—Apr.2018 September 2018. Snapshot of Work and Schedule Progress LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Construction is complete. Items • Project will be delayed until summer of 2019 due to permitting review timelines and in-water work windows. Risks/Issues • Lowest bid was over current budgeted amount. Additional funds will be available at the fund level due to expected costs underruns on another project funded by stormwater. Changes • 11111 Project Name: Frewing Street Stormline Replacement Project Manager: Jeff Peck Project Number: 94041 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD Description This project will replace damaged stormline,eliminate bends in the mainline and replace two substandard catch basins. Additional work added during design phase will upsize existing undersized and damaged culvert pipe. Budget 0 Minor Issue * Wood- * GeoPacific—12/01/20 Schedule • On Target Contracts * CESNW- * Miller Consulting Engineers- Scope Q Minor Issue * Universal Field Services-12/31/20 * GeoPacific Engineering- Total Project Budget: 8284,000$638,000 Status: Design Total Project $135,401 External $571,000 $46,867 Internal $67,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $112,469 External $298,000 $37,243 Internal $27,000 Total Project%Spent: 29% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete:15% External budget does not include additional design&construction costs to replace the failing culvert system,added in Fy21 budget. 1) Project Design-March 2019 through August 2020 Project Schedule 2) Easement Acquisition—March through September 2020 3) Bid to Contract Award—August 2020 through September 2020 4) Construction Timeline—September 2020 through November 2020. Snapshot of Work • Environmental Permitting including DSL,Army Corps of Engineers,Clean Water Services. and Schedule • 90%design completed. Progress • Working through property acquisition process LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Receive final plans,specifications,and estimate Items • Prepare bid documents • Additional damaged pipe identified,increasing scope of project needs. Risks/Issues • Additional environmental permitting required for permanent impacts to the natural resource. • Scope and budget increases were included in Requested FY20 CIP budget and in Q1 supplemental budget request. Changes Additional damaged storm pipe was identified,the existing culvert pipes require replacement,and will require additional funding to be requested during FY21 budgeting. STORMWATER Project Name: Tigard Triangle Stormwater Implementation Plan Predesi n Project Manager: Lori Faha 111 • Project Number: 94044 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD Using stormwater data and general storm facility location/sizing information generated in the citywide Stormwater Master Plan project, an implementation plan meeting CWS approval for regional stormwater management in the Description Tigard Triangle will be completed.Site-specific preliminary design for regional facilities,floodplain restoration,trail alignment, right-of-way/easement acquisition needs and storm conveyance infrastructure will be included in the plan. Budget On Target * IGA with CWS Schedule • On Target IGA/Contracts Scope • On Target Total Project Budget: $165,000 Status: Planning Total Project $87,003 External $145,000 $6,376 Internal $20,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $87,003 External $145,000 $6,376 Internal $20,000 Total Project%Spent: 57%* Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 50% • Consultant Contract(through CWS)—November 2019. Project Schedule • Draft Plan and Reviews—Spring Summer 2020. • Final Plan—Summcr Fall 2020. • Analysis completed of creek/floodplain enhancement needs to accommodate current and future storm flows. Snapshot of Work • Consultant created subbasin strategy plan outline. and Schedule • City staff work on communications materials,including video,to be used for collecting input on draft plan. Progress • Meetings with CWS,consultant,Tri Met. LOOK AHEAD • Monthly City/CWS/Consultant team meetings. Upcoming Work • Receive and review draft report materials. Items • Stakeholder input on draft,including TriMet,Creekside property owners,permitting agencies. Risks/Issues • Work must be completed,meet CWS requirements,and plan deemed permittable by permitting agencies timely enough to allow City to implement and use plan as permitting conditions for TriMet SW Corridor project. • Consultant contract is slightly more than originally budgeted,additional amount included in Proposed CIP Budget for Changes FY21. • Due to slight delay in consultant work a 01 adjustment will be needed to carry forward funds from FY20. STORMWATER Project Name: Commercial Street Stormwater Facility Project Manager: Andy Newbury 11111 Project Number: 94045 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD Construct a stormwater facility,or facilities,to treat stormwater runoff from up to 47 acres that discharge into Fanno Description Creek meeting outfall-retrofitting goals identified in the regional Healthy Streams Plan.This project will be coordinated with the Main Street Green Street Phase 2 Project. Budget • On Target * Century West Schedule 0 Minor Issue IGA/Contracts Scope • On Target Total Project Budget: $376,000 esign Total Project $- External $321,000 $- Internal $55,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $- External $31,000 $- Internal $15,000 Total Project%Spent: % Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 2% 1) Issue RFP and hire consultants—Summer/Fall 2019. 6) Permitting—March February 2021. Project Schedule 2) 30%design—August 2019 September 2020. 7) Bid and award—April March 2021. 3) 60%design—November 2019 November 2020. 8) Begin construction—July April 2021. 4) 90%design—February 2019 January 2020. 9) End construction—Juno April 2022. 5) Final Design—October 2020 February 2021. Snapshot of Work and Schedule • Preliminary design work was completed as part of Main Street Phase 2 project. Progress OO--U1.0111— Upcoming pcoming Work • 30%design drawings showing storm water treatment options. Items • Due to COVID19,meetings with adjacent property and business owners have been delayed. Outreach will begin later Risks/Issues once owners are more able to discuss the project. • Changes • STREETS Project Name: Pavement Management Program(PMP) Project Manager: Nichole George Project Number: 95001 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD This project,funded by the Street Maintenance Fee, provides for the preservation or replacement of the asphaltic Description concrete by overlays,crack sealing or slurry sealing.Streets and treatments are determined based on traffic volume, pavement condition,opportunities to combine with other projects and other factors in order to maximize the utility of the funding available. Budget On Target * Wallis Engineering * Morgan Holen Schedule • On Target Contracts * Brown Consulting(121st Ramps) Scope • On Target * Doolittle Construction(Slurry) Status: On-Going Program FY 2019/20 $2,068,254 Project Budget External $2,788,000 $131,155 Internal ■ $100,000 Total Project%Spent: 85% • New Crack Seal only Project bid opening August 5th,2020 • Punch list items being finished by August 15th,2020 for Slurry Project Project Schedule • Durham Paving finish date of August 15th,2020 • 121st Ramps punch list items to be completed by August 15th,2020 • Marion County striping contract TBD(Generally late August) • Durham paving complete(Night paving done on July 26th) Snapshot of Work • 121st ramps complete and Schedule • Slurry complete(finishing up striping) Progress LOOK AHEAD • Bid opening for Additional Crack Seal contract next week(August 5th) Upcoming Work • Start the rate study/Street Maintenance Fee update with Kittleson in September Items • Start the PMP 5-year plan update in October with GRI Risks/Issues • An opportunity for schools not being in session till November will allow us to get additional crack seal in Changes • 5-year PMP plan and SMF update will happen this year. . STREETS 1.11114 Project Name: Pedestrian and Cyclist Connections Program Project Manager: Christy Zellmer Project Number: 95027 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD Projects may include sidewalk/bike lane/pathway construction,crosswalk treatments and minor intersection modifications. Description Projects will typically cost less than$50,000.Funds from this program can also be used to cover matching funds for eligible grant projects benefitting pedestrians and cyclists. Budget On Target * CES NW * Brown Contracting Schedule • On Target Contracts * Materials Testing * Quality Counts Scope • On Target * MSA * DOWL Status: Ongoing Program FY 2019/20 Project Budget $11,215 External $260,000 $67,676 Internal $40,000 Total Project%Spent: 82% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 75% Project Schedule • Multiple projects each fiscal year. • FY 20 work to date: o Finished design for enhanced crosswalk on Tiedeman at the Fanno Creek Trail. o IGA with ODOT changed federal money from ARTS grant to local dollars,for more efficient use of funds for 99W Streetlights(this program provides the city match funds). Snapshot of Work o Sidewalk along 124th Ave near Ann Ct.complete. and Schedule o Finished design for enhanced crosswalks on Tigard St at Katherine St and Grant Ave. Progress o Scholls Ferry At-Grade Crossing Study underway. o Transportation Safety Action Plan completed. o Started construction for enhanced crosswalks at Tiedeman,Grant and Katherine. o Annual pedestrian and bicyclist counts have been taken. o Additional ADA ramps and a bus pad constructed in conjunction with the Pavement Management Program. o CDBG grant project to add sidewalk along Frewing Street has begun(this program provides city match). LOOK AHEAD • Finish construction of enhanced crosswalks on Tigard Street at Katherine St and Grant Ave. Upcoming Work • Finish construction of enhanced crosswalk on Tiedeman at the Fanno Creek Trail. Items • Design for 99W Streetlights. • Finalize Scholls Ferry At-Grade Crossing Study. • Risks/Issues • Changes Project Name: Tiedeman Ave Complete Street-Fanno Creek to Greenburg Rd Project Manager: Jeff Peck Project Number: 95038 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 ds, Build a "complete street"with sidewalks and bike lanes along Tiedeman Avenue from Fanno Creek to Greenburg Description Road. This will include a traffic signal and/or other improvements at the Tiedeman Avenue/Tigard Street intersection. Associated stormwater infrastructure will be added to treat stormwater runoff. Budget On Target * Mobley Engineering(Lancaster) Schedule • Major Issue Contracts Scope • On Target Total Project Budget:$935,000 Status:On-hold Total Project $11,544 External $840,000 $7,533 Internal $95,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $1,268 External $355,000 $5,378 Internal $50,000 Total Project%Spent: 2% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 2% The project schedule has been prepared with a reduced scope of work. See Changes below: Project Schedule 1) Scope Development—Winter 2019. 2) Consultant selection for preliminary traffic study—May 2019. 3) RFP Design solicitation—On hold until FY22. • Developed a preliminary cost estimate and scope. Snapshot of Work • Hired Mobley Engineering to evaluate existing and future conditions at the intersection of Tiedeman Ave and Greenburg and Schedule Progress Rd.and infrastructure needs to accommodate future-year traffic volumes. LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • On hold until FY22. Items • Improvements to become interim if MSTIP funding is granted to improve Tiedeman Ave and Greenburg Rd. Risks/Issues • Moved project out to FY22 due to division workload. • Project scope and budget will be reduced to only provide a bike lane,sidewalk,and associated stormwater infrastructure Changes to treat and convey stormwater runoff along the east side of Tiedeman Avenue from the railroad crossing,south of North Dakota Street,to Greenburg Road. The improvements will complete the pedestrian/bicycle gap from Main Street to Greenburg Road. This allows the budget to stay within currently available city funds. STREETS Project Name: Upper Boones Ferry/Durham Adaptive Signals Project Manager: Tegan Enloe ■ Project Number: 95041 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD This project is installing traffic signal coordination from Durham Road to Pacific Highway including 13 traffic signals and two rail Description crossings.Traffic users consist of residential,school,city park,office and retail. Washington County is administering the grant funds. Budget 0 Minor Issue * Washington County Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts Scope 0 Minor Issue Total Project Budget: $1,000,000 Status: Design City of Tigard Budget: $213,500 Total Project $124,357 External $164,500 $28,573 Internal $49,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 External $10,000 $5,668 Internal $10,000 Total Project%Spent: 72% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 60% *This project is primarily federally funded-$1M.Percent spent reflects that the city's match has been paid Project Schedule 1) Preliminary Implementation—2019. 3) Adaptive Control Implementation—Spring 2021. 2) Detailed design—Present to Summer 2021. 4) Detection System Improvements—Spring 2021. • Updated signal controllers and optimized time-of-day signal timing plans. • Implemented pedestrian-friendly features. Snapshot of Work • Implemented real-time coordination between the Durham/Summerfield and Durham/Hwy 99W signals. and Schedule • Installed travel time readers and high-capacity wireless communications. Progress • Installed pan/tile/zoom traffic cameras at several locations—now on www.tripcheck.com. • ADA ped button/landing inventory complete. • 60%design review. Upcoming Work • ODOT STIP amendment to increase project cost based on 60%design,Washington County to cover cost increase. Items Risks/Issues • Unknown timeline for STIP amendment. • Projected construction cost increase at 60%design of$327,000 due to scope increases,project delays and inflation, Changes Washington County funds to cover. Project Name: Commercial Street Sidewalk(Main to Lincoln) Project Manager: Andy Newbury Project Number: 95042 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 This project will construct a sidewalk along one side of Commercial Street from Main Street under the Pacific Highway overcrossing to Lincoln Avenue;a pedestrian path connecting Commercial Street to Center Street and sidewalk along ast side of Pacific Description Highway from Nacvc Strcct to Bccf Bend Road and base only for future sidewalk along Pacific Highway from Naeve to Beef Bend will be constructed.This is part of a larger TriMet-managed project to improve access to transit along the Pacific Highway corridor. This portion of the project will be managed by ODOT. Budget 0 Minor Issue * TriMet Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts Scope 0 Minor Issue Total Project Budget: $2,000,000 Status: Complete City of Tigard: $203,000 Total Project $134,182 External $164,000 $36,689 Internal $39,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $- External $30,000 $7,851 Internal $5,000 Total Project%Spent: 84% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 99% *This project will be partially funded with the STIP Enhance Project to be completed cooperatively with TriMet %spent reflects Tigard's required funding match,which includes advance contribution to TriMet 1) Hire consultants—Oct 2016. 5) Permitting—Sept 2018. Project Schedule 2) Preliminary design—Jan 2017. 6) Bid and award—October 2018. 3) Draft acceptance plans—April 2017. 7) Begin construction—April 2019. 4) Final design—July 2018. 8) End Construction—September November 2019. Snapshot of Work • Construction is now complete. and Schedule Progress LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Consultant to complete asbuilt drawings. Items • Final payment to ODOT budgeted for FY21. Risks/Issues • ODOT had only one responsible bidder and construction costs higher than expected. ODOT went ahead and awarded contract and is looking to partners to help fund overruns. • Total project budget reduced in FY18 budget because scope was reduced-stormwater quality facility was pulled out to become a separately budgeted and scheduled city project. Changes • Bids came over construction estimate noted in IGA. Based on negotiations with ODOT,City may be responsible for an additional$50,000 contribution through SDC funds. ODOT will cover the additional$150,000 of the bid amount over the estimate. Additional contribution included in proposed FY21 budget. STREETS AM Project Name: 121'Ave(Whistlers Lane to Tippitt)Sidewalks and Bike Lanes Project Manager: Jeff Peck • Project Number: 95050 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD Construct sidewalks, bike lanes,street lighting, and stormwater improvements along 121'Avenue from Whistlers Description Lane to Tippitt Avenue.This will complete the sidewalks and bike lanes from Walnut Street to Gaarde Street. Budget • On Target Schedule Q On Target Contracts Scope • On Target Total Project Budget: $4,500,000 Status: Design City of Tigard Project Cost:$464,500 Total Project $2,916 External $59,000 $86,826 Internal $405,500 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $2,916 External $12,000 $52,022 Internal $90,000 Total Project%Spent: 19%(based on city funding) Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 15% 1) IGA with Washington County—January 2019. 2) Design Development(Preliminary to Final)—February 2019 through October 2020 May 2021. Project Schedule 3) Property Acquisition—November 2020 through August 2021. 4) Bid Process—February 2021 through April 2021. 5) Construction—July 2022 through February 2023. Snapshot of Work • 60%Design Open House—March 10,2020. and Schedule • Received 90%plans on July 16,2020. Progress • Washington County Declaration of Necessity—July 28,2020. LOOK AHEAD • 90%Plan Review Comments due August 7,2020. Upcoming Work • Resolution of Necessity—TBD. Items • 121st Avenue Record of Survey resolved with County Survey Office in June 2020,delaying property acquisition by several Risks/Issues months. Overhead Utility relocation,prior to commencement of roadway improvements added 4 months to the schedule as well. These delays have pushed the project completion to Spring 2023. Changes • Project Scope has changed to eliminate undergrounding of overhead utilities. The budget changed in FY20 to reflect scope changes. STREETS ■ Project Name: 72nd Avenue/Tigard Triangle Transportation Study Project Manager: Tegan Enloe Project Number: 95051 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD This study will determine the ultimate desired configuration of 72nd Avenue from Pacific Highway south to the Highway 217 interchange area. Existing issues in this area include poor walking and cycling conditions along 72nd Avenue, particularly in the Highway 217 interchange area and near Pacific Highway.Significant traffic congestion Description exists, primarily on southbound 72nd Avenue through the Highway 217 interchange.The study will take into account desires and products from the Tigard Triangle planning and code process,current and future traffic data,Southwest Corridor/transit study input,as well as ODOT and other stakeholder input. Budget • On Target * Angelo Planning —12/31/19 Schedule • On Target Contracts Scope • On Target Total Project Budget: $295,500 Status: Complete Total Project $235,263 External $240,000 $65,127 Internal $55,500 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $89,460 External $105,000 $29,476 Internal $18,000 Total Project%Spent:102% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 100% • Project kick off—July 2018. • Evaluation framework—September 2018—January 2019. • Design tool kit—July 2018—October 2018. • Alternatives development—November 2018—May 2019. Project Schedule • Preferred alternative refinement—May 2019—September 2019. • Final Documents—Spring 2020. • LRT Design Considerations(amendment)—Spring 2021. • Code Updates(amendment)—Spring 2021. Snapshot of Work • Project is now complete. and Schedule • Cross sections have been provided to Community Development for inclusion in code revisions. Progress LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Project is complete. Items Risks/Issues • • Changes STREETS Project Name: North Dakota Street(Fanno Creek)Bridge Replacement Project Manager: Zach Morris Project Number: 95056 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD This project will replace the existing,structurally deficient bridge with a new bridge wide enough to accommodate Description pedestrians and cyclists along with vehicles. Environmental regulations will require a new bridge to be significantly higher and longer than the current bridge.The project may also reduce flooding over the roadway. Budget 0 Minor Issue * OBEC(bridge inspection) Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts * ODOT IGA(federal funding) Scope • On Target Total Project Budget: $5,490,000 Status: Pre-Design City of Tigard Budget: $1,978,500 Total Project $111,116 External $1,771,000 $56,840 Internal $207,500 Project Budget FY 2019/20 External $300,000 $38,016 Internal $80,000 Total Project%Spent: 8% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 5% 1) Design Consultant Solicitation/Selection—August 2019 thru late 2020. Project Schedule 2) Design—late 2020 into 2022. 3) Bid Project—late 2022 to early 2023. 4) Construction—2023. • OBEC's March 2019 inspection of bridge indicates temporary repairs are holding. Snapshot of Work • The State's annual bridge inspection occurred in July 2019. Load rating updated in September 2019,indicated adequate and Schedule capacity for all legal loads. Progress • Coordinated with ODOT on design services RFP. Two proposals were received. Notice of Intent to Award contract was provided by ODOT to OBEC on 12/18/19. Negotiating the design consultant's scope of work and fee estimate is ongoing. LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Continue negotiating consultant scope of work and fee estimate. Aim to have consultant under contract in 2020. Items • Continue monitoring ODOT OR-217 auxiliary lanes(widening)project to coordinate timing of corresponding road closures. • ODOT IGA process took longer than anticipated,which had impact on project schedule. • ODOT anticipates cost escalations but will not be able to fund the entire project cost. Some cost will need to be absorbed Risks/Issues by City of Tigard—City budget increased in FY20 budget process accordingly. • Negotiations with consultant have dragged on,potential is there to cut ties and move on to negotiating with 2nd place firm. Changes • . PARKS Project Name: Fanno Creek Trail Alignment Study(Bonita Rd-Tualatin River) Project Manager: Zach Morris 11111 Project Number: 95057 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD This final section of the Fanno Creek Trail was originally envisioned as an on-street alignment on SW 74th Avenue. Subsequent review suggests the constrained width of the SW 74th Avenue right of way may not readily accommodate Description widening for the trail. This study will involve local stakeholders and other partners in evaluating alignment options along 74th Avenue,the Fanno Creek greenway,and adjacent on-street options, resulting in a recommended trail alignment. Budget 0 Minor Issue * GreenWorks(consultant) Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts * Metro IGA(study funding) 0 Minor Issue Total Project Budget: $208,000 lifts: Planning City of Tigard Project Cost:$47,000 Total Project $89,285 External $165,000 $55,758 Internal $43,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $89,164 $55,000 External Q1$164,000 $45,900 Internal Q1$33,000$1-570(48 Total Project%Spent: 70% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 65% • Data Collection/Analysis:August 2019—March 2020. Project Schedule • Alternatives Analysis:April 2020—October 2020. • Preferred Design:November 2020—December 2020. • Held TAC/CAC Meeting#1 on 11/6/19. Participated in the Fanno Creek Trail open house on 11/20/19. Snapshot of Work • Met with 74th Avenue businesses,TTSD administration,and Durham Treatment Plant management. and Schedule • Transitioned from data collection phase into alternatives analysis phase. Progress • Conducted design charrette with Tigard staff to review identified alignment alternatives,narrowed options down. LOOK AHEAD • Continue to refine alignments. Upcoming Work • Assess how best to hold next round of stakeholder engagement given impacts of COVID-19,prepare materials and Items schedule accordingly. • There are many physical challenges to contend with such as wetlands,road crossings,proximity to the railroad,etc. Risks/Issues • There are numerous stakeholders with varying interests(TTSD,Durham Treatment Plant,Durham,businesses). Outreach and coordination has been more time consuming than anticipated,resulting in minor schedule slippage and internal expenditures tracking much higher than originally budgeted. • The onset of COVID-19 has further complicated the already extensive stakeholder engagement warranted by the project. Change The project team is assessing how shifting to likely virtual/online engagement activities will impact the timing,content, and outcome of said activities. Project schedule has pushed out slightly to account for this development. STREETS • Project Name: Wall Street/Tech Center Drive Connection Project Manager: Andy Newbury ■ Project Number: 95061 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD Completion of a street system from Tech Center Drive to SW Wall Street. The project supports development of Description adjacent undeveloped lands to achieve higher levels of employment.This street segment was divided off from the Hunziker Industrial Core/Wall Street project(#95047)to allow for project phasing and different funding sources. Budget • On Target * Wallis Engineering Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts Scope • On Target Total Project Budget: $2,250,000 Status: Construction Total Project $253,794 External $2,150,000 $50,160 Internal ■ $100,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $253,721 External $289,000 $32,699 Internal $35,000 Total Project%Spent: 14% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 15% 1) Issue RFP and hire consultants—May 2019. 5) Permitting—March 2020. 2) 30%design—October 2019. 6) Bid and award—April 2020. Project Schedule 3) 60%design—December 2019. 7) Begin construction July 2020 August 2020. 4) 90%design—February 2019. 8) End construction—April 2021. Snapshot of Work • Received approval from Metro on 90%drawings. and Schedule • Issued invitation to bid. Progress LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Award construction contract. Items • Begin construction. Risks/Issues • Metro took longer than expected in their plan review. This delayed issuance of the advertisement for bid. • State earmark funds must be spent by October 2020. Changes • STREETS FrewingStreet Sidewalk Infill-CDBG Project Name: Project Manager: Jeff Peck 11111 Project Number: 95064 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD Construct sidewalks,curbs,ADA curb ramps and drainage improvements on Frewing Street between Pacific Highway and Ash Avenue.Storm drainage work includes providing inlets and collection pipe to convey street runoff.The Description project will result in improved northbound pedestrian access to shopping areas and bus stops on Pacific Highway and southbound access to the Tigard Civic Center and the Public Library. Budget • I On Target * KPFF Schedule 0 Minor IssueIGA/Contracts Scope I On Target Total Project Budget: $484,500 City of Tigard Budget: $58,000 Total Project $18,025 External $441,500 $19,708 Internal $43,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $18,025 External $333,500 $19,708 Internal $32,000 Total Project%Spent: 8% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete:10% • Sign Agreement with Washington County—August 2019. • Design RFP solicitation—Published March 6,2020. • RFP Close Date—March 26,2020. Project Schedule • Design-May 2020 thru December 2020. • Bidding Services—January 2021 thru February 2021. • Construction—March 2021 thru May 2021. Snapshot of Work • Conceptual Layout provided for consideration—including reduced street width at creek crossing to avoid wetland and Schedule impacts Progress LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Charter and communication plan. Items • Project survey and design. Risks/Issues • Frewing Street Stormline and Culvert Replacement project must be permitted and constructed prior to sidewalk work. Changes • STREETS Project Name: Pacific Highway Street Lights Project Manager: Christy Zellmer Project Number: 95065 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD Install streetlights at unlit quadrants of intersections where they do not already exist along Pacific Highway through the City of Description Tigard.Intersections include 72nd Avenue,Main Street/Johnson Street,McKenzie Street,School Street,Walnut Street,Frewing Street,Garrett Street,Park Street,Royalty Parkway,and Durham Road.Some lights will be added to existing signals and power poles,some will require new poles. Budget • On Target Schedule • On Target Contracts Scope • On Target Total Project Budget: $1,142,000 City of Tigard Budget: $270,000 Status: Design Total Project External $1,067,00 $9,046 Internal $75,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 External $692,000 $ $50,000 Internal ■ $40,000 $5,000 Total Project%Spent: 1% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 1% • Request for Proposal—July/August 2020. • Final Plans—Winter 2020. Project Schedule • Hire Consultants—August 2020. • Bid Project—Spring 2020. • Preliminary Plans—Fall 2020. • Construction—Summer 2021. Snapshot of Work • IGA with ODOT has been signed for funding change from federal to local.Notice to proceed has been received. and Schedule • Request for Proposal went out and closed on August 4,2020. Progress LOOK AHEAD • Review Request for Proposal for design consultants. Upcoming Work • Consultant selection. Items • Preliminary design. • Project design fee was over-budget with federal funds.There is a risk that the project(design and/or construction)may Risks/Issues be over budget even with the removal of federal requirements and State project management. Changes • Project grant funding was de-federalized and project is now being managed by City staff instead of ODOT. . WATER Project Name: Cache Reservoir and Pump Station Design Project Manager: Shasta Billings-Beck Project Number: 96040 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD The project is for the design of a new water reservoir,associated new water lines,and replacement of a temporary pump station for the City's 560-foot service area.The reservoir will be constructed on City property located on the Description west side of Bull Mountain in the Sunrise Lane vicinity.A new permanent pump station will replace an existing temporary pump station on the Reservoir No. 13 site to move water from the 410-foot to the 560-foot service area. This project is being proposed to meet demand from continued development in River Terrace. Budget On Target Schedule • On Target Contracts Scope • On Target Total Project Budget:X22,972,500 Status:Pre-Design Total Project External $21,924,500 $25,415 Internal ■ $1,048,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 External $350,000 $25,399 Internal $30,000 Total Project%Spent:0% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete:1% Fall 2020:Alternative delivery option selected and Winter 2022:Design complete,contract issued for adopted by City Council construction,construction begins Project Schedule Winter 2021:RFP released for solicitation of proposals for Spring 2024:Construction complete,project closeout design team Spring 2021:Design team selected,negotiations complete,contract issued • RFP for Owner's Representative in process.Owner's Representative to assist in determining which alternative project Snapshot of Work delivery method will best suit this project,public notice and presentation to City Council,as well as preparation of the and Schedule RFP,review of proposals,and selection of the team for the design/engineering/construction portion of the project,and construction oversight. Progress • Met with TVWD to learn about their similar project and their use of the Progressive-Design-Build alternative project delivery method. LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Reviewed received proposals for Owner's Representative,pricing requested from 2 of 3 proposers. Items • Will likely perform interviews with top proposers too. Risks/Issues • Large project needs to be delivered with limited internal staffing. Will likely require alternative project delivery method. • Changes WATER • Project Name: Red Rock Creek Water Line Relocation Project Manager: Shasta Billings-Beck Project Number: 96046 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD Installation of a new 12-inch water line to connect two dead-end lines,which will allow over a half-mile of aging 12-inch water line currently located in Red Rock Creek to be decommissioned and properly abandoned. • •-- • On Target * Murraysmith 2/15/16 6/30/18 Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts * Wcstlakc 1/31/19 • On Target * AKS— Total Project Budget:$855,000 Status:Design Total Project $132,941 External $705,500 $125,074 Internal $149,500 •roject Budget FY 2019/20 $23,013 External $589,000 $35,596 Internal $54,500 Total Project%Spent:30% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete:35% Project Schedule 1) Design—Fall 2019 3) Construction—Fall 2020 2) Permitting—Summer 2020 4) Project completion—Winter 2021 • Phase 1-Wall Street/Red Rock Creek o As part of the Wall Street project,the new water line connection that feeds the east side of Red Rock Creek was installed.Public Works Operations connected the existing Wall Street water line to the existing Potso Dog park water line in summer 2019. o Plans for the Hall Blvd connection to existing system are 90%complete and on hold pending rail alignment. • Phase 2-Milton Court to Tech Center Drive(internal budget expenditures increased due to adding this work phase) Snapshot of Work o Permitting in progress-METRO has agreed that no alternatives exist,easement request was approved by and Schedule METRO Council December 2019,however the easement has not yet been granted as METRO and Clean Water Progress Services(CWS)are currently working through how to allow CWS to maintain the vegetated corridor without METRO also having to grant an additional easement to CWS.Both agencies agreed to covenant language to be placed on the property deed,however now CWS will not revise the SPL until all materials have been submitted for both the Fanno Creek Trail and Tiedeman bridge projects as well. In addition, METRO will not issue the easement to the City until CWS updates the SPL. o 100%design drawings and the Intent to Bid documents were prepared by AKS Engineering in December 2019. o City staff are currently preparing the General Conditions. LOOK AHEAD • Once a contractor is selected,AKS to obtain Railroad permit to perform construction work within the right of way. Upcoming Work • Work with TriMet to understand proposed SWC rail alignment and potential impacts to proposed Hall Blvd.water line. Items • Latest rail alignment has the work near Hall Blvd.on hold. • Existing water line in creek is inaccessible for maintenance and at risk of breakage without the project. Risks/Issues • Proposed SWC rail alignment may impact proposed location of water line. Changes • Added Phase 2(Milton Court to Tech Center Drive)in order to take advantage of the proposed Fanno Creek Trail project. This will allow the dead-end water line located in Tech Center Drive(crosses existing railroad tracks prior to cap)to be connected to the dead-end water line located in Milton Court,which will create a system loop. • Schedule was extended to account for METRO and CWS to agree to legal language to be added to the property deed. WATER Project Name: Canterbury Pump Station Project Manager: Shasta Billings-Beck • Project Number: 96047 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD Description This project will rehabilitate the existing pumps and electrical components.This will extend the life of the existing pump station (PS)until the Bull Mountain Road water line is constructed. udget On Target * Murraysmith 6/30/18 Schedule • On Target Contracts * PEI 6/30/2020 cope • On Target Total Project Budget: $506,500 Status:Substantially Complete Total Project $106,438 External $418,500 $64,786 Internal $88,000 Project Budget 111 FY 2019/20 $60,095 External $278,000 $16,271 Internal $26,000 Total Project%Spent:34% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete:90% • Winter 2019—Operations staff reduced use of the PS so the existing pumps can be removed and refurbished. • Spring to fall 2019—Engineering coordinated with Operations and Consultant(PEI)to complete design for PS and Project Schedule refurbish existing PS. • Spring 2020—Operations coordinating with Electrical contractor to install meter vault for flow meter. • Summer 2020—Project closeout. • Preliminary results are to keep the current facility and propose a more extensive solution in the Water Master Plan. Snapshot of Work • Consultant(Murraysmith)recommended the City purchase a standby pump and motor,refurbish the existing PS, and Schedule Progress relocate the electrical service and pump controls above grade,and upgrade the electrical service if needed. • The ultimate solution to the Canterbury PS capacity issue is to construct the Bull Mountain Road water line. LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Project Manager to complete project close-out tasks. Items • Engineering to coordinate with Operations to complete site work and perform pump test once flow meter is operational. • Rehabbing the existing PS will allow for continued reliable service to the 530-foot pressure zone,however it will not Risks/Issues alleviate the fire flow deficiencies.Constructing a new pipeline from Reservoir 16 to the Canterbury PS,commonly referred to as the Bull Mountain Road water line,would address fire flow concerns and also help with winter water quality concerns in Reservoir 16. • Murraysmith scope of work complete(pre-design only), PM Worksheet now reflects the new/next phase of the project. Changes • The remaining budget will be used by PEI to complete the design and refurbish the existing PS. WATER 11111 Project Name: Water Master Plan Project Manager: Shasta Billings-Beck Project Number: 96048 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD The city conducts water master planning every five to ten years.The current Water Master Plan was adopted in May 2010,with a minor addendum in 2014 to include the River Terrace development.The Water Master Plan is a comprehensive study of the city's Description water source,storage,and delivery systems and will be used to guide future water utility decisions.The master plan has a 30-year planning horizon and is predicated on the city's anticipated population growth during that time. Budget 0 On Target * Murraysmith-6/30/2020 Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts Scope • On Target Total Project Budget:$488,000 Status: Planning Total Project $334,478 External $398,000 $107,893 Internal $90,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $208,259 External $253,000 $25,878 Internal $5,000 Total Project%Spent:91% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete:92% • Completed Tasks: o Hydraulic model development—Summer 2018. o Draft 410 reservoir needs for UGB expansion and siting options. o Preliminary review of water system—Fall 2018. Project Schedule o Draft of current hydraulic operations—Winter 2019. o Sections 1—7 are complete,and the full draft including Section 8 is under staff review and comment. • Future Tasks: o Preliminary Draft Plan—Summer 2020. o Final Document for Approval—Fall 2020. Snapshot of Work • Workshops completed in spring and early summer 2020: and Schedule o Consultant worked with geotechnical sub to perform seismic risk analysis on distribution system Progress o Regularly met with consultant to discuss sections being prepared and to review comments on previous sections o CIP workshop to inform the water rate and SDC study. LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • City staff reviewing draft of full master plan. Items • Presenting full draft of master plan to Water Advisory Board on August 31,2020 and Council on September 15,2020 • Risks/Issues Changes • WATER Project Name: Fonner Street/121st Avenue Valve and Piping Improvements Project Manager: Shasta Billings-Beck Project Number: 96050 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD Description The project includes design and construction of both a pressure-reducing valve and approximately 900-feet of 24-inch pipe and associated appurtenances. Budget • On Target * Murraysmith— Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts * PEI— Scope • On Target Total Project Budget:$472-5-57000$1,412,000 Status: Design Total Project $51,177 External $1,260,000 $38,100 Internal $152,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $51,177 External $200,000 $31,248 Internal $70,000 Total Project%Spent:6% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete:15% • This work is being coordinated with the Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation project for SW Project Schedule 121st Avenue(kick-off completed March 14,2019). • Project design and ROW acquisition to be completed from summer 2019 to summer 2021. • Project construction to be completed from summer 2022 to fall 2023. • Met with Washington County consultant(WHPacific),Murraysmith,and PEI. • Murraysmith completed conceptual design and rough order of magnitude cost estimate,which was incorporated into Snapshot of Work WHPacific's(WHP)30%submittal. and Schedule • Murraysmith submitted 60%design drawings and cost estimates for the PRV vault,which were incorporated into WHP's Progress 60%design submittal. • Murraysmith and PEI submitted 90%design drawings and cost estimates for the PRV vault,which were incorporated into WHP's 90%design submittal. LOOK AHEAD • Review 90%submittal in July 2020. Upcoming Work • Meeting with underground utilities(not yet scheduled). Items • Continued coordination with aboveground utilities(kicked-off in May 2020). Risks/Issues • ROW for 121st Avenue not resolved with County Survey Office,which is delaying property acquisition and will delay construction. Changes • WATER Aquifer Storage and RecoveryWell#2 and Well#3 � • Project Name: q g Project Manager: Shasta Billings-Beck Project Number: 96053 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 T I G A R D The City's Aquifer Storage and Recovery(ASR)program began in 2001 with the drilling of ASR 1. In 2006,the City completed the construction of the ASR 2 facility,and in 2007 the City drilled and tested ASR 3.This project has three phases: Description 1. Construction of new facilities to make ASR Well 3 operational. 2. Replacement of electrical devices with easier-to-maintain components to existing ASR 2 facilities. 3. Connection of two pressure zones to improve storage and distribution from ASR 3. Budget • On Target * Murraysmith Schedule • On Target Contracts Scope • On Target Total Project Budget: $6,425,000 Status: Design Total Project $109,345 External $6,325,000 $40,170 Internal ' $100,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $109,345 External $825,000 $40,170 Internal ■ $40,000 Total Project%Spent:2% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete:5% • Project kick-off:spring 2020. • Initial data gathering for Well Rehabilitation Plan complete:spring 2020. Project Schedule • Well Rehabilitation Plan complete and preliminary design submitted for review:summer 2020. • Well rehabilitation work and final design complete:spring 2021. • Construction complete:spring 2022. • Charter and Project Communications Plan completed in April 2020. Snapshot of Work • Kick-off and initial site visits completed April 15—16,2020. and Schedule • Samples for Well Rehabilitation Plan collected from ASR 1,ASR 2,and ASR 3 on April 23,April 30,and May 6,2020. Progress • Preliminary Design Report and Well Rehabilitation Plan submitted for review. LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Review of Preliminary Design Report and Well Rehabilitation Plan. Items • Preparation of bidding and contract documents for well rehabilitation work. Risks/Issues • All facilities are located in residential neighborhoods,construction noise could be a nuisance to neighbors. • In preparation for this work,ASR 3 was videoed in spring 2019,where it was determined that the screens are fairly occluded.In addition,ASR 2 has seen approximately at 20-percent decrease in specific capacity since coming into Changes production in 2006.Therefore,rehabilitation of these wells,along with work to resolve historic operational issues at ASR 1,was added to the scope.In addition,a connection to Reservoir No.4 was added to the scope to alleviate winter water quality issues in Reservoir 16. WATER Project Name: Emergency Street and Water Project-Greenfield Project Manager: Andy Newbury 11111 . II Project Number: 96054 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 TIGARD An 8"waterline failed on Greenfield Dr. near the intersection with 132"d. The failure caused significant damage to the Description subgrade and asphalt in Greenfield Dr from SW Maplecrest Ct.to Gaarde St.This project will address the damage and provide repairs to Greenfield Dr. Budget 0 On Target * GT Excavating- Schedule 0 On Target Contracts * Wallis Engineering- Scope 0 On Target * Eagle-Elsner- Total Project Budget: $1,200,000 Status: Substantially Complete' Total Project $262,978 External $1,000,00 $35,203 Internal $200,000 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $262,978 External $500,000 $35,203 Internal $100,000 Total Project%Spent: 25% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete:98 1) Hire consultants—December 2019. 5) Permitting—March 2020. 2) Contractor Repair Stabilization—December 2019. 6) Bid and award—April 2020. Project Schedule 3) 60%design—February 2020. 7) Begin construction—May 2020. 4) 90%design—February 2020. 8) End construction—July 2020. Snapshot of Work • Contractor was able to complete all work by June 15. Greenfield Dr.now open. and Schedule • Surveyor has submitted post monumentation survey to County. Progress LOOK AHEAD Upcoming Work • Respond to survey comments from County. Items EMI— • Greenfield Dr.to be closed until permanent repair has been completed. Changes • Project Name: Main Street Green Street Retrofit(Phase 2) Project Manager: Andy Newbury Project Number: 97017 Actuals as of: 6/30/2020 The project will extend the improvements completed during Phase 1 to the improvements completed with the Pacific Description Highway/Main Street/Greenburg Road project. Improvements include new sidewalks, new asphaltic concrete and the collection and treatment of stormwater runoff using low impact development approaches(LIDA). Budget 0 Minor Issue * Century West- Schedule 0 Minor Issue Contracts Scope • On Target Total Project Budget: $2,659,000 Status: Design City of Tigard Project Cost:$1,923,000 Total Project $86,052 External $2,454,500 $115,919 Internal $204,500 Project Budget FY 2019/20 $85,764 External $1,835,000 $56,555 Internal - $100,000 Total Project%Spent: 8% Project Manager's Total Project Estimated%Complete: 9% 1) Issue RFP and hire consultants–Summer/Fall 2019. 6) Permitting–March February 2021. 2) 30%design–August 2019 September 2020. 7) Bid and award–April March 2021. Project Schedule 3) 60%design–November 2019 November 2020. 8) Begin construction–J.ly April 2021. 4) 90%design–February 2019 January 2020. 9) End construction–Juno April 2022. 5) Final Design–October 2020 February 2021. • Additional work completed on concept plans. Snapshot of Work • Completed preliminary revised parkinlot layouts for proerties affected by preferred driveway closures. and Schedule • Began work on storm water and water line design. Progress • Created Main St.webpage. LOOK AHEAD • Begin meetings with property owners showing concept plans. Upcoming Work • Review stormwater and water line design. Items • Finalize traffic analysis. • 30%drawing submittal. • Project funding through Metro is half of originally budgeted amount. The grant funding is now de-federalized which allows for complete local control which is anticipated to make up for most of the reduction,but more city funding may be Risks/Issues needed. TBD during preliminary design. • Due to COVID19,meetings with adjacent property and business owners have been delayed. Outreach will begin later once owners are more able to discuss the project. Changes • Project cost increased in proposed FY21 CIP budget based on preliminary design information. AIS-4356 4. Workshop Meeting Meeting Date: 08/18/2020 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: Update on SW Ascension Drive Traffic Issues Submitted By: Lori Faha, Public Works Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Staff will provide the council with a briefing and update on a proposed resolution to traffic safety issues along SW Ascension Drive. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST No action is requested. This will be an update to council and opportunity for council to ask staff questions and provide input. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY In February 2020 Engineering staff received a citizen complaint about lack of visibility on SW Ascension Drive in the "s-curves" due to parked cars and concerns about potential for collisions. Engineering staff conducted a review including visiting and driving the curves multiple times under different conditions, calculating line of sight distance needs based on national standard methods, and reviewing the street width against city codes and standards. The street is narrow at 28 feet, and current code and standards requires No Parking on at least one side for such streets. The street dates from 1995 and staff could not find records to indicate why it was not signed for No Parking from the time it was constructed. Given the curves and additional sight constriction in this area, Engineering staff recommended removal of parking on both sides and sent a letter to residents along the curves that said this change will occur. After receiving a significant negative response from the neighbors, Engineering staff sent a second letter to Ascension Drive residents giving more information about why the conclusion was made to remove parking. After more and considerable public input, staff set up virtual one on one conversations with residents in the curves to hear more about their concerns about parking and other traffic related issues. Staff then set up an Engage Tigard web page on July 1 to provide more information and to allow a public forum for asking additional questions, offering additional concerns, or sharing ideas. The City Engineer posted an updated, compromise approach to remove parking on only one side in the curves and other mitigating measures, based on neighborhood input and consideration of risk to the city and citizens of not fully removing the visual obstacle caused by parked cars. Staff have also been monitoring the web page and posting responses to questions. The web site was open for posting of questions and comments until the end of July. Neighbors on SW Ascension Drive have expressed concerns to the city over the years about speeding, traffic volume and unsafe driver behavior. In 2017, after an incident in which a car was driven across a resident's lawn, staff met with neighbors to review the situation and the follow-up response included installation of 15 MPH advisory speed signs at the s-curves and purchasing "Your Speed Is" feedback signs to utilize in a rotating basis on streets including Ascension Drive. The city has also been collecting annual speed and traffic volume data on Ascension Drive, and the Police Department has conducted some targeted enforcement. The neighborhood, similar to other parts of the city, is continuing to see impacts of growth from infill and urban growth boundary expansion in terms of traffic on the public street, and they have shared concerns about this with staff and council. The presentation to council will summarize steps taken, what we have heard from the neighbors, and the City Engineer's plan for traffic safety mitigation measures as well as longer term continuation of monitoring of traffic speeds and volume. Staff will also brief council on lessons learned from this issue and steps being taken to provide for a more transparent traffic safety and parking issues program and process. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION None Attachments Ascension Drive Presentation CITY OF TIGARD Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done lig • TIGARD Ascension Drive SafetyUpdates Tigard City Council I August 18, 2020 CITY OF TIGARD Ascension Drive Safety Issues Update City Council requested an update on Ascension Drive traffic safety issues and proposed mitigation measures. / Presentation & Discussion Agenda tonight: Background/history Initial proposal What we've heard Adjusted proposal — what's included, what's not and why What we learned and how we will use that going forward Next steps Questions CITY OF TIGARD Ascension Drive — Vicinity Map Beaverton rSW Ascension Drive T1 rlar (1 IN ISCDON•LO SW BULL rOUMTAIN.i......,_rt., 7 mm..II A I King City -..� ,. ea DURN4M Rc CITY OF TIGARD Background Older - 2017: City staff's response to a reckless driving and speeding complaint. 1 Incident — vehicle in a yard 1 Staff met with property owners / City response: Posted 15 mph advisory speed signs at the curves / Purchased "Your Speed Is" feedback signs for citywide rotation / Started collecting annual traffic speed and volume data Police conducted targeted enforcement several times upon request City staff denied request for speed humps CITY OF TIGARD Background Recent - 2020: In February, City staff received a complaint of low visibility through the S-curves. 1 Staff investigation confirms substandard vision/sight distance in the curves with parked cars. Solution - removal of parking. 1 City notification letter to neighbors. Complaints followed. 1 Second city letter with more information. 1 Meetings with property owners via Microsoft Teams due to COVID-19. 1 Created a Your Tigard engagement web page to collect additional input Included an amended proposal for No Parking on one side of the street based on Teams meetings input 1 Responded to questions received on the Your Tigard page. CITY OF TIGARD Ascension Drive — Engagement Page Details A Your Tigard page was created to collect additional neighborhood comments, ideas and questions. Staff included on the web page the following adjusted mitigation measures: This summer: No parking on one side of Ascension Drive through the S-curves. Add striping to address reckless driving concerns. Pursue a 20 mph neighborhood streets program, including implementation on Ascension Drive. CITY O F TIGARD What We Heard The Your Tigard web page received 257 visits. 5 participants completed the survey, 9 contributors submitted 20 questions. The top 3 issues mentioned: 1 Speed Humps (Mentioned in 13 questions, 2 survey responses) There is a strong desire from participants that speed humps be installed on Ascension Drive. 1 Speeding (Mentioned in 12 questions) Speeding is the most common safety concern among participants, often related along with concerns about increasing traffic volume. 1 Unsupportive of Removing Parking (Mentioned in 9 questions, 1 survey response) About 40 percent of respondents are unsupportive of removing parking in the curves on Ascension Drive. 1 Other: We also heard clearly from neighbors in the curves that removing all parking would cause access and livability issues. CITY OF TIGARD Final Ascension Drive Safety Updates Based on feedback and engagement, the proposal has been further updated to include: / Removal of parking on one side (inside of the curves) / Permanent install of "Your Speed Is" sign / Install a centerline stripe in the S-curves with raised buttons / Continue to collect speed & volume data / Pursue City Council approval of a citywide 20 mph speed limit on priority neighborhood streets CITY O F TIGARD Measures Not Included Staff received several suggestions that are not recommended for implementation. / Leave the parking alone Sight distance needs require us to remove some parking; the recent accident could have been even worse if parked cars were present 1 Speed humps Steep street concerns No existing program. If/when city re-institutes as a traffic calming program, need to consider priorities, equity, costs of administration / Blocking the street to outside traffic The city is seeing traffic increases due to growth / We lack connectivity, and it's difficult to add it Ascension Drive is a neighborhood route designation CITY OF TIGARD Line of Sight Visibility Evaluation Example © / : \ J ' z _ a . 4 -. ifial 1:4( , � Itir \ . . - z •� - : . . , \ rg ' .• 4 f , . _ �,� f P " llimi. » E - . 'f . � , - . .r.,...,..:' ` ` / • . / '. � � \ .ec-. . .... . a k . �� 1001.° - Pr ' . - ' 4! ' � . ^ . . : � ‘1114:47. / ! � • , . . 2 2 Ir . .� • : _' \ . . . � - N ` �\ ` 0 w /4 . . : ® , ! - _ zz . � , . , ? 2 ,< . A.% ' A - 411 ii.... y � . *it�// { . \ � f ���• �ilp i � . • � - e - � b % - . 9/ ' .a K¥.• a L..."' : : ' 2. - ® -. i CITY OF TIGARD What We've Learned This project brought to light concerns about the level of neighborhood involvement in responding to traffic safety complaints. / We need a comprehensive and transparent approach to addressing safety concerns, including a communications plan. In this case, removing parking addresses visibility — but not other important neighborhood traffic safety concerns. / We want to use data to help prioritize and direct where limited funding can be used for traffic calming and other measures citywide. / Improve transparency: Share what we can/can't do, timelines and priorities. CITY OF TIGARD Traffic Speed Monitoring In response to previous community concerns, the city has monitored speed on Ascension Drive since 2017. This table is a draft ranking summary for streets with speeding complaints. Speeding Requests Posted Measured Percent Speed Count Weekday Weekend Functional Street Start Stop Speed 85th Over Over Year ADT ADT Class Notes 79th Bonita Durham 25 38 52% 13 2019 7303 4934 Neighborhood Durham Elem 97th McDonald Murdock 25 36 44% 11 2018 1514 643 Neighborhood Twality,Templeton 103rd McDonald Inez 25 35 40% 10 2017 1428 1436 Local Tiedeman Walnut Tigard 25 34 36% 9 2019 8016 6617 collector Fowler 98th Sattler Durham 25 33 32% 8 2019 3981 2352 Neighborhood Greenfield Benchview Gaarde 25 33 32% 8 2018 3133 2560 Neighborhood 115th Gaarde Fonner 25 33 32% 8 2018 2146 1666 Neighborhood 108th Durham Titan Ln 25 32 28% 7 2017 2065 1704 Neighborhood Horizon Blvd Windsong Barrows 25 32 28% 7 2019 1648 1328 Neighborhood Northview Walnut Windsong 25 31 24% 6 2017 1165 951 Neighborhood Omara McDonald Frewing 25 31 24% 6 2016 1081 860 Neighborhood Benchview Mistletoe Greenfieb 25 30 20% 5 2017 2340 1661 Neighborhood Ascension Mistletoe Fern 25 30 20% 5 2019 1042 966 Neighborhood Steep,narrow,curves Fairhaven 110th Watkins 25 30 20% 5 2018 221 132 local McDonald 97th Hall 35 41 17% 6 2019 12115 3494 arterial CITY OF TIGARD Draft Citywide Speed Data Analysis 3 !- I I ri r sw dram I) f Speed Issue Count Site- • f I I • j ._ H cascade or I �w 7eln Ave _ Amount by which 85%Speed ,. i -• 1 . 410 Exceeds Posted Speed I SW LocS: LI`• _ sw Locust Sl of-i_, t_1 ti /: /• SMPN MPH. 10-11 PH _--� 1 -'I SW Oak S[ SW x51 - iI • S-7MPH _«��" .. 5 -6• n I 1 �- I . I 1 O B-9 MPH •12-13 MPH �:W 130th Ave Shady Ln I1, - j-1 _ .�� -- ---1-( t ..1 % swud4h 7xorastO J .wsslp•;i ' M`_ / SW 115th Avail, s Ir i SW Tigard St [ ! O SWT tleman A �W Harres,' L t \1IFy / 1`_ `Y// - - • 1 SW Tiedeman ' SW 2nd Ave 410i1 � SW Honhvi�w'B:.` W Walnut St AveO :w, rldln PI�SW 69M Av Sw s M1 Pkwy 7 SW • Ce Tnrercial 5t .Mains 1 �II���G» ��r{1 } elk �SW Ho,,xon Bv_ SW Walnut$1• �••/ 1 ' F ,�s��'rat �r/ 1 � vt S1 es.,Former St •S has S! - ' 7`• --'`f"-R-T'!'r" f r1 1i ©W t3Sth'Ave O SW Former SI SWHS %Mer St •SWSS�Ave ''` . ' j r SW 1stA� Sri WATMII15 Ave • SW FrewinS St •, 1 1 r 11SW Ascension Or •S�a�Ra 1 • - I f 1 _ SW Greenfield or //�e 5�r La �k--� SW GA iTi'ST� $W 7 Ave I - _ I O SW Gaartle SI SW Fairhaven St • k • OSW Hilfshire Or • O I t\ O SW 1151S Ave SW Benchwew Ter 0 �`/ Sw Omara St SW Hall Bled I /a LI .4,�_.I • _ SW •Gaartle • .�...an 1 S !I ,Ij Y 1 rv-1 • 111-"±-"n''' SW 120•' "W93rtl Av ' 193r4 Ave® • r y1 SW 9JIh Ave r'i VI SW mortuary En yV( 1 'L �`-: I I �- r_. 1 f �. n• • j f Ir 1 ..-r-1- 1- SWMurpxx St --5 St I.e SW75thAv' ^1, rj O F_I r l I 1 • seen Ave 7d Ave I � (, \-..1 t......,.. f SW LADY MARIDI[OR Ow •- I� 1• .n • Ca incl-tn - r V • OsW sattkr 5! ii •_ F-. SW Refl ood Ln i . -- e SurnrItelf*Id IN , ISA. L----+ ---- k 1 ^SW 9715 Ave 1 ' 3afJa t."'k��?:fa Rr_ Ir--a. SW B�,O Rd 1 SW]9th AIDswT r �e._.. . --' ._ - • • 1113'1%7 t SW Durham Rd• `{ ~-- I! •SW 106th Ave SW Sind Ave / J - I �f, N-� -- — : b t ice/ I 1 ri - upAer El CITY OF TIGARD General Process for Traffic Safety/Parking Issues Traffic Safety or Parking Complaint Quick Review NO. Is POTENTIAL problem NO. ci typeIs the Close higher problem YES. Can out & risk? well City response defined? • POTENTIALLY do • • something about it? YES. Evaluate, NO. determine • Prioritize for problem, • eval to potential High Risk determine solution Address ASAP problem, •• YES. Sort & potential • Prioritize Response solution Moderate or Lower Risk - Address in order of priority CITY OF TIGARD Next Steps / Inform neighbors with what we've heard and staff's final decision / Ascension Drive Safety Updates project (Summer/Fall 2020) No parking on one side of Ascension Drive through the back- to-back curves. Add striping and tactile bumps to address reckless driving. Installation of a permanent "Your Speed Is" sign / Continue to collect speed and traffic volume data. / Pursue a 20 mph neighborhood streets program, including implementation on Ascension Drive. Goal : December 2020 / Implement a more transparent traffic safety and parking issues program and process. Goal: December 2020 CITY OF TIGARD Questions? AIS-4334 5. Workshop Meeting Meeting Date: 08/18/2020 Length (in minutes): 45 Minutes Agenda Title: RECEIVE BRIEFING ON I-205 TOLLING PROGRAM Prepared For: Marty Wine, City Management Submitted By: Carol Krager, Central Services Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall the Tigard City Council receive a briefing on the I-205 Tolling Program? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST This is a briefing only; no action is required. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Lucinda Broussard, I-205 Tolling Program Manager will give a status report about the tolling program as it moves into the NEPA (Nattional Environmental Policy Act) phase. She will be joined by WSP Consultant Team Project Manager Heather Wills and WSP Alternatives Analysis Lead Mat Dolata. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Council has not previously received a briefing on this topic. Attachments PowerPoint 1-5 and 1- 205 Toll Projects City of Tigard City Council 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects Update August 18, 2020 Agenda 1 Welcome Introductions and Agenda Review 2 Project Updates 3 1 -205 Purpose and Need, Goals and Objectives 4 1 -205 Screening Results Discussion 5 What's Next? q4_44. -'' I-5 and 1-205 Toil Projects * rres=ton �:, ` •h , � ` N; August 18, 2020 12 www.Oregunlolhng.nrg Project Up ,,,,,..„ P j LUCINDA BROUSSARD, ODOT kirrftii . or 4 0. t ` I-5 and 1-205 Toff Projects ts DOerygonm r atvn ` h ' �; August 18, 2020 13 www.OregunTalling.oig Project Area _ _ \ _ _ _ _ , - ...., I Price all lanes both directions {, _ _ _ _ VIIIEvaluate start and 11= pre stop points and design variations for i ,;,4.A0 t Happy Valley tolling options ok) c. ilk -- cl".-Tu z. 205 — ~' ' �b0KNeti e\I t � West ��,a'_-�,� I F �. Linn .' � - �� Oregon City (__Y \----)\ .....--- ------2\ U ` I-5 and 1-205 Toil Projects ` J+ De artmont �:, ` •//' h , � or rarrspvrtativn ` ' �; August 18, 2020 14 www.OregonTolling.org Value Pricing Feasibility Analysis ° mea Vale QricinA • Considered bigconcepts for implementing tolls on I- P° °nd "` a►ysis p p g peasibilitY 205 and 1-5 n� �eiNt Qncept Ewa1�4an ��tive Surt+�ar( • Recommendation to further study tolls on 1-205 around Abernethy Bridge between Stafford Road and OR 213 • Extensive input from regional stakeholders, agency _. 7,' �. ri --zik partners and the public — ,i} �: . itik r. _,_-,_,• We heard the need to: : -- ...„-, Ai' , • Avoid negatively affecting low-income , ; f communities ' t `G .• �, • Improve transit and other transportation choices • Address the potential of tolls to divert traffic to local :::I205 4417,0' 4 I-5 Toll Projects * Orvgon De art= 400.ft` ` •h , or rarrspvrtativn ` , *'. 4 August 18, 2020 15 www.OregunTalling.nrg What WHeard About T Over the Last 3 Years • Tolls must be implemented equitably, including where and how revenue is used • Questions about operation and effectiveness of modern toll - systems ' 101111._ . • Opinions about the need for roadway and transportation ,��� imil SHO _ Iii system expansion p oi( N%, • • Tolls are not equitable across all income levels fi4(/ n • Transit service along the 1-205 corridor is not robust enoughlift r to afford residents of northwest Clackamas County another travel option as an alternative to driving : : . • Tolls will create additional diversion into communities along ="_.. (iria ,,,,‘ , .. r „Ni $ 1,,id the 1-205 Corridor • Concerns about how local trips that use 1-205 will be treated 6iii',.:,*,1 4 • . • � � 1-5and 1-205Toll Projects riEns,,,z.... ` ♦ August 18, 2020 16 www.OregunTalling.oig **,' Can tolls be equitable? What are the historic injustices Given where we are in the world, that ODOT has committed at this moment,how do the Or,what would against communities of color, demonstrations relate to the equitable tolls look Albinospecifically, and others Eq Ult and Mobility ...1owk of this committee? like? in general? _IL Advisory Committeer " . .--- .._a . I .. 0.., -,.i,;;. , .• Ai ff— L Nitt :. } �ti Y May Reception - -.W. :._, . ■ puppr iiii 0 �,� ��.��. ��.WI L • Meeting one another ,A. • . 1111 lei , 4 IIF:o. i• • • • • �, J JIT w '•a tww=r•.,• lir— r�rrrJ �. Meeting 1: Listening session • Responding to events in our communities, nation and world ......f. * g Meeting 2: July 28 EMAC Listening •.. • Draft charter and workplan Session — June 29 . r • '` I. • Toll Projects' Equity Framework • Update on the 1-205 and 1-5 Toll Projects How can tolls create benefits for everyone? How does current Are there questions/ concerns What would that look like? transportation policy / needs/fears that must be contribute to addressed in order for you to inequitable outcomes? effectively work on thisWhat are the metrics that committee? ♦ s•■.. demonstrate to you that ODOT ‘,2%,,41%,0 ®.r is doing things differently? 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects * c11 an to r ranspvrtativn ` ' �; August 18, 2020 17 www.OregunTalling.nrg Upcoming : 1 - 205 To ProjJectSta e o eran CommunityEngagement a 45 day public comment period -_ - August 3 — September 16, 2020 �• p ''�' eller 4. - }► Si; A Purpose 1-205 Toll Project • Obtain feedback on the Range of Alternatives Raising revenue and improving traffic A, for environmental review to benefit you - • Obtain feedback on the purpose and need PillP6s.— 'fir: _ • Increase awareness of toll systems (purpose, f _ i operations and benefits) - - • Share information about how results of j Oregon Feasibility Analysis informed 1-205 Toll Project ' Department es and ODOT's approach to equity 611N011 %. AI/ 1 `" 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projectsnes=....■ ��:, ` `�� �.� ` ,. .., 10„,% ♦�_ August 18, 2020 18 www.OregunTalling.oig Stakeholder and CommunityEngagement for 1 - 205 To Project General Engagement Equitable and Focused Engagement • Online open house with survey, • Stakeholder interviews webinars • Discussion groups with historically • Information sharing: 1-205 Toll and currently underrepresented and Project website, social media, fact underserved communities sheets, presentations • Community engagement liaisons • Boards, councils, committee presentations and briefings • Meetings with project advisory and working groups `" 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects 64N. 1 * TREns,v.„.%:, ` •h , � ` w. August 18, 2020 19 www.Oregunlolhng.nrg 1 - 5 Toll Project : Planning an Environmenta Linkages Define questions to be answered during -, ; -_f . Planningand Environmental Linkages � ` g � , • North and south toll endpoints = ;t.: _ � . i 1_,- -k Yw .3. air • Alternatives for environmental review = - ate-; int :r, Public and stakeholder engagement • Fall 2020m. _ . �� • Equity and MobilityAdvisor Committee � • Focused outreach to underserved and #_ -�' 4 = underrepresented communities i - ;,\ ,.Ilk,. :� 1-5 and 1-205 oll Projects Orvgon .740. De mn tatvn ` ' �. August 18, 2020 110 www.OregunTalling.oig 1 - 5 and 1 - 205 NEPA Milestones 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 1st Half 2nd Half 1st Half 2nd Half 1st Half 2nd Half FWHA starts Select preferred FHWA publishes NEPA Process alternative Final EA I-205 NEPA O Milestones . . . * FHWA publishes Publish Draft EA for P&N,Project Alts public comment Public comment on Purpose &Need,lalternatives,and Selectreferred FHWA publishes Draft planning findings alternative -final decision I-5 NEPA ♦ I ♦ 41111 . . . Milestones Begin planning and Initiate Publish draft environmental linkages environmental review environmental document �:, � I-5 and 1-205 Toll Projectsrig.. �� 1 �� rnspvrtslivn t August 18, 2020 I 11 www.OregunTalling.org 1 - 205 Toll J Project : Project Milestones 2020 2021 2022 Q3 Q4 Qi Q2 Q3 Q4 Qi Q2 Q3 Early Engagement Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) Phase Final EA B-gin preparation Phase if NEPA technical Develop Publish Draft EA Define Range of documents mitigation for for public Alternativesi= Project Impacts comment _ ° ■ 4 I FHWA starts FHWA publis es Begin preparation of Select Update EA and FHWA NEPA process Purpose any Draft EA Preferred refine publishes Need, Project Alternative mitigations Final EA Alternative. Public Engagement Virtual publicPublic open A Public open Public Public open A W open houses M houses houses hearings houses 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projectsnes=...4, 6A.N 4 0. ■ ■�:, ` `�� �� J ` ♦WA August 18, 2020 112 www.OregonTolling.org 1 - 205 and N Goals and Obj HEATHER WILLS, WSP riN 4 ` I-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects rfiRE=.... , � m; August 18, 2020 113 www.OregunTalling.oig Purpose aNeed Statement 0A concise statement of the transportation problem or What IS It? challenge that needs to be addressed Foundation for determining the range of alternatives to be considered in the environmental review How it's (till"- used Limits the range of alternatives any alternative that fails to meet the project's purpose and need is dismissed from further consideration (pass/fail) K. q447- '-' - ` 1-5 and I-205 Toll Projects O regononf %, ` •h , ` WW, August 18, 2020 114 www.OregunTalling.oig Goals and Objectives 0 What are Desirable outcomes of the project beyond the Purpose and they? Need Statement Comparison and evaluation of alternatives studied in the How they environmental analysis ■ are used Develop qualitative and quantitative measures LP Nit>. q"°. 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects ects O regon ant ` h , '111111..•:,...411Piti, 1Pro �; August 18, 2020 115 www.Oregunlolling.nrg Project Purpose • Manage congestion on 1-205 between Stafford Road and OR 213 • Raise revenue to fund congestion relief projects Manage Generate Congestion Revenue Toll Rate Dual Objectives rf.iTols 4 I I-5 and 1-205 Toil Projects Orvgon **, De artmont �:, ` •h , or rarrspvrtativn August 18, 2020 116 www.OregunTalling.nrg Equity and Purpose Statement • ODOT is centering equity for the decision process and outcomes • Equity and Mobility Advisory Committee is guiding equity approach through recommendations • Goals and objectives: Equity focused goals and objectives • Leads to evaluation criteria and performance measures • Purpose: Transportation focused used to narrow potential set alternatives to a reasonable range for thorough analysis • Must be very specific, given legal precedents 61,N1' • � ` •h , 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects ects rimizz.tion ' August 18, 2020 117 www.OregunTalling.oig Project Need Regional • • 20.1% vehicle hours of delay increase (2015 — 2017) • 13.4% hours of congestion increase (2015 — 2017) • Portland metro region is expected to grow — 2.5 million residents in 2018 to over 3 million in 2040 (23%) • Freight tonnage movements projected to double by 2040 • vreennouse gas (GHG) emissions from venicies represent 39% of statewide emissions (2016) • Governor's Executive Order to reduce GHG emissions 45% below 1990 levels by 2035 of0 1-205 Stafford Road to OR 213 `•II • More than 6 hours of congestion daily (2017) • • Northbound direction is top reoccurring bottleneck during p.m. commute Funding needed for congestion relief projects • Available funding not keeping pace with need • 1-205 Improvements Stafford Road to OR 213 Project, including Abernethy Bridge rmrsiAlt.tionn 1-5 andI-205 Toll Projects to ,is,, ♦�% August 18, 2020 118 www.OregonTolling.org Goals and Objectives • Provide equitable benefits for all users • Improve air quality and contributions to climate • Engage and benefit populations who have been change historically or currently underserved and • Reduce vehicle air pollutants and GHG emissions underrepresented • Reduce localized air pollutants • Engage harder to reach communities • Maximize benefits, minimize burdens • Support multi-modal transportation choices • • Transit, telework, ridesharing, and infrastructure Provide equitable and reliable access to jobs, important community places • Increase access to a variety of transit service providers • Provide equitable and reliable access to health care • Support regional economic growth facilities and health-promoting activities • Reliable movement of goods and people • Limit additional traffic rerouting • Support travel demand management • Toll system design to limit rerouting from tolling • Efficient use of infrastructure • Toll system design to limit additional noise • Support safe travel regardless of mode • Maximize integration with future toll systems • Toll system design • Reduce congestion • Ensure multi-modal travel is not less safe on • Maximize interoperability with other systems roadways affected by tolling • Toll system design 4 „. 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects n �:, ` •h �� or anspvrtativn ` ♦�_ August 18, 2020 119 www.OregunTalling.oig Next Steps in t Environmental Review Process Early Public and Agency Involvement • 45-Day comment period : Draft Purpose and Need, range of alternatives, issues to be studied • Invite participating agencies Prepare Draft Environmental Assessment • Includes a comprehensive analysis of potential impacts/benefits • Develop methodologies to assess these impacts • Report on performance measures Public Comment Period on Draft Environmental Assessment 44N1% I 1-5and 1-205Toll Projects TREns,,,Ltion % ii.....,:..,.r,;,,„...,,t, ' �; August 18, 2020 120 www.Oregunlolling.nrg 1 - 205 Analysis Results ,VIAT DOLATA, WSP riN 4 riVii=1.,m. ` I-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects,, or..„;,..,..1, August 18, 2020 121 www.OregunTalling.oig Alternatives AFra mework for 1 - 205 Feasibility Analysis : 1 alternative advanced for 1-205 Concept E can manage traffic ana generate revenue on 1-205 Initial Screening (Range of Alternatives) : 5 alternatives -Are there toll configurations that have better outcomes? 42027 using Metro's regional travel demand model Environmental Review: 2 or 3 alternatives for detailed study - What are impacts of the alternatives and is mitigation needed? 42040 using more refined tools Preferred Alternative: 1 alternative 4 Refine project and identify impacts and mitigation :*"'■�:,� ` •h 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projectsrims,Ltion1 it August 18, 2020 122 www.Oregunlolling.nrg 1 - 205 Screening Alternatives Alternatives Considerations • Simple to understand and implement 1. Toll on the Abernethy Bridge • Limited ability to manage traffic demand (Concept E from the Feasibility Analysis) • Concentrated rerouting through Oregon City 2. Toll Abernethy Bridge, with tolling gantries off • Refinement of Alternative 1 bridge • Designed to limit rerouting of through trips on 1-205 • Tolls on reconstructed bridges over Tualatin River and Willamette River 3. Individually Toll Multiple Bridges to be Rebuilt • Split toll amount between two locations • Through trip pays more than local access trip • Toll split across four segments: amount paid depends on number of segments travelled 4. Segment-Based Tolls — Stafford Road to OR 213 • Most flexible for traffic operations management • More complex pricing structure to communicate to users • One toll rate for all trips entering toll zone 5. Single Zone Toll — Stafford Road to OR 213 • Through trips pay the same as local access trips • More complex implementation because of the multiple toll points Note:All of the alternatives assume that toll rates would be set to generate net toll revenues sufficientto fund the tolling infrastructure and system,seismic upgrade,and reconstruction of the Abernethy Bridge,and the third lane construction on 1-205 between Stafford Road and OR 213, including associated overpass/underpass and interchange improvements. diLl 1 4 • 1-5 and I-205 Toll Projects regon ztativn` 4 ' ' �, August 18, 2020 123 www.OregonTolling.org / , [1. Toll on Abernethy Bridge (Concept E from VPFA) Gladstone 4. Segment-based tolls-Stafford Road to OR 213 ae £ \ 43 l ' ce £ 0 gg Gladstone rzos '''2 West Linn e ct'` ? s5 7c °R West Linn •e� c Sr Iti 1/1W 9..,,. .. '47,01,16' 'EFN4TNYK0 oy rP 213 / `�� 213 q's; _ > go sr BUINN. IV o -IP 1 \Ab\. 0� 0��o yrL \b\ J� O�G�V��o ¢ N 0 0.5 1 4.:.,,,,,, s�`��' S N 0 0.5 1 4�(9ge ,,,,..°a''''' N S I I 3 ie A I �f Oregon City 3 ® I `�F�eA Oregon City miles Or Is 9R miles t(SOR al.Ct a4�tFt t Tolled freeway segment �+t�n z Tolled freeway segment IPotential toll gantry location J I Potential toll gantry location / J 3. Individually toll multiple bridges to be rebuilt 5. Single zone toll -Stafford Road to OR 211 / 3 Gladstone e 99 Gladstone e° 99 e 43 43 f � .. 4 hF Vi O aye s sRn�er � e iii k mus��ae+ West Linn F�F� cT�`"0. `a s � West Linn �f� c4" o 6'1 -_.. TSD Skii/ry£AS� 1,.'0 ,;-':' `Ac'o 'Z' C �7FD l'''''llillir'°''''''''PA-'1>;( Pbot'0S5 //�—/ �''Gear~ It 4MYP 1111111 bilk yc N �� 213 r" 213 S3i u? ill ,..„ % y Hs s '"n o o o \�f �� GN4b q N O 05 1 mN 0 0.5 i I a Istir ..- s�,c ® miles `' miles N. �rAL,,,„ las° Oregon City Tolled freeway segment `AicsnR Oregon City Tolled freeway segment Qy, s','"'' I Potential toll gantry location � Potential toll gantry location J l I ♦ Gantry located on on-ramp / 4111% . ` 1 der • ri= tioRIllirr .410' L' 15 and 1205 Toil ProJects it .:t. 1 t , kik ' I August 18, 2020 I 24 www.OregonTalling.org Performance Measures for Screening Alternatives Category Evaluation Criteria Performance Measures Transportation Change in regional system vehicle travel demand and Regional vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for freeway and non-freeway travel System Demand performance Regional vehicle hours traveled (VHT) for freeway and non-freeway travel 1-205 Traffic Change in vehicle throughput on 1-205 Vehicle throughput on 1-205 segments between Stafford Road and OR 213 Diversion Effects Mode shift to high-occupancy vehicles (HOV), transit Regional person trips by mode and active transportation, bus, pedestrians, and bike Change in volume on non-tolled roads (rerouting) Qualitative level of rerouting Change in average weekday daily traffic volume on selected major roadways Cost and Revenue Adjusted gross toll revenue collected Annual gross toll revenue less estimated revenue leakage in 2027 Toll operations and maintenance costs Cost associated with toll collections (roadway equipment maintenance, back office systems software, customer service center operations, banking fees, financial reporting, and management/ administrative activities) Net toll revenues Adjusted gross toll revenue collected less toll operations and maintenance costs and highway operations and maintenance costs Initial toll system capital and procurement costs Capital costs associated with implementing the physical toll infrastructure and procuring toll vendor services Implementation Difficulty of implementation Qualitative— Relative effort associated with implementation and Operations Operational Flexibility Qualitative—Ability to react to differing traffic conditions in the Project vicinity Scalability to a future tolling system Qualitative— Potential to integrate with future tolling system including other regional roadways Federal program eligibility Qualitative— Eligibility under current federal tolling authority ■ ®r 1-5 and I-205 Toll Projects Frogon , � r rarrspvrtativn ` ' August 18, 2020 1 25 www.OregonTolling.org Changes in 1 - 205 T • 2027 model results show daily volume Daily Alt 1 Alt 3 Alt 4 Alt 5 reductions on 1-205 Stafford Road to 10th Street -17% -36% -31% -17% • Diversion (off 1-205) is worse during the off- 10th Street to OR 43 -23% -24% -36% -11% peak hours on a percentage basis than during OR 43 to OR 99E -48% -33% -33% -17% peak hours. OR 99E to OR 213 -28% -19% -40% -30% • Diversion is less significant immediately P.M. Peak Alt 1 Alt 3 Alt 4 Alt 5 outside of toll area, generally: Stafford Road to 10th Street -2% -20% -9% -1% • -10 to -20% between 1-5 and Stafford 10th Street to OR 43 -10% -7% -10% +6% • -5 to -10% north of 82nd Drive OR 43 to OR 99E -33% -19% -15% -3% OR 99E to OR 213 -18% -9% -24% -21% Screening analysis model scenario results for 2027 ' Cf"Nitow ° 4 I % 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects Oregon am atvn h Aper......:wo, August 18, 2020 126 www.Oregunlolling.nrg Diversion off 1 - Where does traffic divert to? Would demand change? Rerouting to other roadways • Model results show potential for single occupancy vehicle trip reductions • Regional • Shift primarily from singlele occupancy • Local — near tolled area vehicle to high-occupancyvehiclle (shared ride) with 4,000 to 5,000 additional high- Transportation demand management occupancy vehicle person trips per day • Change time of day • Potential shift to transit is very small (<500 person trips) using current • Change destination assumptions about future transit • Change mode • No significant difference in mode share between alternatives Screening analysis model scenario results for 2027 4 . `'' I-5 and I-205 Toll Projects * TREns,v.„. %%, " ` •h , ` wo, August 18, 2020 127 www.OregonTolling.org Transportation SYstem Deman • All alternatives reduce vehicle miles traveled, Daily VMT Alt 1 Alt 3 Alt 4 Alt 5 with the greatest decline occurring in Freeway -338,000 -413,000 -463,000 -213,000 Alternatives 3 and 4 Non-Freeway +117,000 +179,000 +185,000 +94,000 • All alts reduce vehicle hours traveled, with Total -221,000 -234,000 -278,000 -119,000 greatest decline in Alternatives 4 and 5 • All alts also result in a shift in vehicle demand away from freeways to non-freeway routes Daily VHT Alt 1 Alt 3 Alt 4 Alt 5 • Peak hours show greatest potential vehicle Freeway -11,400 -13,300 -14,300 -10,200 hours traveled savings overall, with potential Non-Freeway +10,300 +8,900 +9,300 +5,000 decrease on non-freeways as well as freeways Total -1,100 -4,400 -5,000 -5,200 • Daily change is <1% of regional vehicle miles Screening analysis model scenario results for 2027 traveled or vehicle hours traveled . 101 `14.01*%. `" I 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects t. Orvgon De artmonf �:, ` •h . or rarrspvrtativn ` `�W40, August 18, 2020 128 www.Oregunlolling.org Locations Assessed fRerouting Effects on 1 - 5 1%. 6 n r 8Iv CO4,,,b4. Rive, Portland Change Relative to 2027 I Map— IN Baseline Alt 1 Alt 3 Alt 4 Alt 5 - x 0.0111001.110 26 0 1-5 north of 1-405 0 to +2% 0 to +2% 0 to +2% 0 to +2% u 41 . Q illimmemeg 1-5 Marquam Bridge 0 to +2% 0 to +2% 0 to +2% 0 to +2% 0 ,f ,_3,,, Beaverton 1-5 east of Terwilliger Blvd +2 to +5% +2 to +5% +2 to +5% 0 to +2% ® 1-5 north of OR 217 +2 to +5% +2 to +5% +2 to +5% 0 to +2% I _Milwaukie 1-5 north of 1-205 -0 to -2% -2 to -5% -2 to -5% -2 to -5% 9�'T;�ara Lake Oswego 14. I-5 at Boone Bridge -2 to -5% -2 to -5% -2 to -5% 0 to +2% j`IQ',, Screening analysis model scenario results for 2027 Tualatin ash ,ladst •� West Linn N. © Oregon City Wilsonville 3 11%,),/ • I I ■. I S I-5 and 1-205 Toil Projects ects DOerygonm r atvn Il , * August 18, 2020 129 WW W Oi egonTolling.oi g Other RegionalHighways Assesse or Rerouting Effects i co, ,,;.. Change Relative to 2027 Alt 1 Alt 3 Alt 4 Alt 5 Q Baseline U.S. 26 west of Skyline Blvd 0 to +2% 0 to +2% 0 to +2% 0 to +2% Lv�l/ Portland .-t '- W and Scholls Ferry Rd \40 Ola OR-217 north of 99W 0 to -2% 0 to -2% -2 to -5% 0 to -2% —t: 0.°C;71 OR-217 east of 1-5 0 to -2% 0 to +2% 0 to +2% 0 to +2% i A Z 1-84 east of 1-5 0 to +2% 0 to +2% 0 to +2% 0 to +2% N M 1-205 north of 1-84 0 to -2% 0 to -2% 0 to -2% 0 to -2% `^ ig 7 ti Screening analysis model scenario results for 2027 217 � 99 m N(1- _� _ Milwaukie Beaverton v . ` �.... Tigard .: � ®* � 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projectsrivi=1...�, a ., `� ,,. „` _ August 18, 2020 130 www.OregonTolling.org Alternative Routes Assessed Beyond 1 - 205 Beaverton Miivvar�kie ir Happy Change Relative to = 99 Valley 2027 Baseline Alt 1 Alt 3 Alt 4 Alt 5 Tigard 0 Lake illi OR 43 south of +5 to +10% +5 to +10% +5 to +10% +5 to +10% Oswego Terwilliger Blvd Stafford Road south SwBorland R -10 to -20% -10 to -20% -10 to -20% -5 to 10% 43 Glaaston of Ek Rd Tualatin Sherviac d d .tee ♦ Tiw West Stafford Road east of ij -10 to -20% -10 to -20% -10 to -20% -2 to -5% �', Linn SW 65th Ave 4 Oregon City OR 99E Downtown +30 to +40% +30 to +40% +20 to +30% +2 to +5% z�;, ` Canby •,,,,, L Wil orivilles 99 Screening analysis model scenario results for 2027 A le ij ell I I 1 Canby • ` , 4,_,,, 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects raft. „,,,_ .,,_._ ,,, wc.,,, August 18, 2020 131 www.OregonTolling.org Local Rerouting Near 1 - 205 Beaverton LI) i 1 c ` Milwaukie ` � g Happy L Valley Change Relative Alt 1 Alt 3 Alt 4 Alt 5 � __ , ' to 2027 Baseline , Tigard 0 �— Lake / Borland Rd east of +90 to +90 to 3 Oswego Stafford Rd 40 to 50% +100% +30 to +40% +100% \ <_.,, i:we°ia"dA1 Ok Gladstone Borland Rd east of -10 to -20% <+2% -5 to -10% +5 to +10% Tualatin o`a 411SW 65th Ave Sherwood sia� . West c,'' tp Linn Screening analysis model scenario results for 2027 Oregon City Wilsenvill r1 v_ J Canby +• 1-5 and ��nn ��r Projects' Model results do not show potential for vehicle miles traveled• � 2V Lroy.go. e artmon!�� increase in Tualatin or Wilsonville. rA^Bpo.lslio^ August 18, 2020 132 www.OregonTolling.org Local Reroutingin Oregon City ,), 4. P P • �r� Change Relative to Pp • 2027 Baseline Alt 1 Alt 3 Alt 4 Alt 5 9g 1 eau h� ' CD OR 99E Oregon CityWest Linn �o� 1 g +20 to +30% +20 to +30% +10 to +20% -5 to -10% .,4°' ' South Boundary 0141 5I , Oregon City Arch +90% +40% +40% ° zos Bridge +80 to +30 to +30 to +20 to +30% as rr': r*• Oregon City ' Downtown Oregon +80 to +90% +40 to +50% +30 to +40% +10 to +20% ��°� •� City Screenline 7.11.111.111*/ �North Oregon City e *. +5 to +10% +2 to +5% +30 to +40% +20 to +30% Screenline -Pt OR 213 south of 1-205 -5 to -10% -5 to -10% -5 to -10% +5 to +10% Interchange p � Screening analysis model scenario results for 2027 99- Oki` 1-5 and I— 05 Toll 5-10% total vehicle miles traveled increase on 6 V Projects rce-,=... .. " ` -4 �;, non-freeways citywide. ' �; August 18, 2020 133 www.OregonTolling.org Local in West Linn Change Relative to • Lake Alt 1 Alt 3 Alt 4 Alt 5g s 2027 Baseline 30 we o Irl s� Salamo Rd east of 10th +30 to 4 �<, o St +40% -40 to-50% -10 to -20% -30 to -40% iP- ap. Willamette Falls Dr east +90 to +10 to99 of 10th St -10 to -20% -40 to-50% +100% +20% l eds. OR 43 south of Glenmorrie Dr -10 to -20% +2 to+5% +2 to+5% <+2% @ 9 Gladstone ip- Willamette Falls Dr east +2 to +5% -5 to-10% +50 to+60% +10 to / *, of A St +20% Ro East West Linn '�'°°rid ` 213 Screenline -20 to -30% -10 to-20% -5 to -10% -10 to 20% 4° West Linn 9++� 41 ‘lik Sunset Ave west of - 14° 13 Willamette Falls Dr <+2% -5 to-10% -5 to -10% -10 to -20% Or-in (over 1-205) � Rosemont Rd north of ° +10 to A -40 to -50% +10 to+20% +5 to +10% � b \5 � Santa Anita Dr +20% AI ., ewe 4,6. Screening analysis model scenario results for 2027 .� - ` -- ■ Citywide vehicle miles traveled change on non-freeways varies. 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects Potential decrease in Alternatives 1 and 2. opartmon! �>� . of Trrnspvrtativn :.�'�•;�� �`� Alternatives 4 could increase by—10-15%. � August 18, 2020 134 www.nregonTolling.org ReroutingAnalysis Approach ( Additional Rerouting fTolls ) Stages of Analysis Level of Detail Feasibility Analysis Identify potentially impacted routes Screening Identify potential scale of impact at key locations during peak, off-peak, and daily Environmental Assessment Identify impacts to study intersections during peak hours and any needed mitigations to meet mobility standards • Peak period congestion effects will be part of the environmental analysis • Recognize and demonstrate that rerouting exists today 44N1% .i: ` : 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects TREns,v.„." .. *. t4 4 1 August 18, 2020 135 www.oregunTalling.nrg Performance Comparison Summary Category Alt 1 Alt 3 Alt 4 Alt 5 Transportation Worse outcomes than Average or typical Average or typical Better outcomes than other alternatives outcomes among outcomes among other alternatives System Demand alternatives alternatives Average or typical Average or typical 1-205 Traffic outcomes among outcomes among Worse outcomes than Better outcomes than alternatives alternatives other alternatives other alternatives Average or typical Average or typical Average or typical Average or typical Diversion Effects outcomes among outcomes among outcomes among outcomes among alternatives alternatives alternatives alternatives Worse outcomes than Better outcomes than Substantially Better Average or typical Cost and Revenue other alternatives other alternatives outcomes than other outcomes among alternatives alternatives Implementation and Average or typical Substantially Better Better outcomes than Substantially Worse outcomes among outcomes than other outcomes than other Operations alternatives alternatives other alternatives alternatives 7,,,,. 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects ects r rvgon f am .00 n tativn. ` ` ' �; August 18, 2020 136 www.OregonTolling.org I n itia I Recommendations for Further Study Category Alt 1 & 2 Alt 3 Alt 4 Alt 5 Transportation Worse outcomes than Average or typical Average or typical Better outcomes than o •ng o •ng System Demand other alternatives of Iter ' es —,..:I IIdLIV, IlLCI IIdLIVt 77 1Average or typical Average or typica i orse ( Bett es than -205 Traffic outcomes among Average among alternatives other d.,.„_. .. other a ernatives Advance Advance J Average or typical Average or typical Diversion Effects outcomes among to NEPA to NEPA outcomes among alternatwes alternatives tcomes than Average or typical Worse ou Cost and Revenue other alternativesoutcomes among alternatives Implementation and Average or typical Subs . :etter Better outcomes than Substantially Worse outcomes among outcomes than other outcomes than other Operations alternatives alternatives other alternatives alternatives ��.7,,,„ Refine toll schedule assumptions to improve regional outcomes • 1-5and I-20Toll Projects Oregon De artmonf : ` orTransportation e ' �; August 18, 2020 137 www.oregonTolling.org I a s Next ? LUCI N DA BROUSSARD, ODOT 4 • :, ` •h , � I-5 and 1-205 Toff Projects Drvgonm tativn ` ' �; August 18, 2020 138 www.Ole gunTalling.nrg Upcoming Activities August Summer 2020 1J Begin formal Environmental Review and Briefings with Boards, Councils 3 Comment Period for 1-205 and Committees • Online survey, online open house, webinars, discussion groups I,=sa 13 Oregon Transportation Commission TBD Is=Sa In-person Outreach Events 44N. of I-5 and 1-205 Toil Projects Orvgon De artmonf �:, ` •h , � or rarrspvrtativn ' �; August 18, 2020 139 www.OregnnTnlling.nrg ` �. COs. A 41111k 4ft Have our sa ! 74yy 11 • Online open house and online survey - N ,_ , ....... (English and Spanish): ,� . \ • www.0regonTolling.org *.. - 0 :41 . 1 ., ' ' r • Webinars: - d s .' r 1. \�\ • August 12: Noon-1pm ° ; ,`, • August 18: 4-5 pm i f r '' v • August 20: 6:30-7:30 pm ft , • Submit comments: 1. 9 • Email: oregontolling@odot.state.or.us T i • Voicemail: 503-837-3536 U Al: '\s ' 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects * regon artmont�:, ` •h , 4 rarrspvrtativn ' s August 18, 2020 140 www.OregunTalling.oig Contact Lucinda Broussard, Toll Program Director (ODOT) Lucinda.Broussard@odot.state.or.us 503.731.4980 Heather Wills, Consultant Team Project Manager (WSP) Heather.Wills@wsp.com 503.731.4340 Mat Dolata, Alternatives Analysis Lead (WSP) Mat.Dolata@wsp.com 503.417.9364 64N. 1 `" 1-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects * Ore n .:, ` •h , spvrtativn ` �' August 18, 2020 141 www.OregunTalling.oig AIS-4371 6. Workshop Meeting Meeting Date: 08/18/2020 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: City Center Futures Project Update Prepared For: Sean Farrelly Submitted By: Carol Krager, Central Services Item Type: Update, Discussion, Meeting Type: Town Center Direct Staff Development Agency Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: • Information ISSUE Presentation on the City Center Futures TIF District plan analysis. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST The Board of the TCDA is requested to provide feedback on increasing the maximum indebtedness of the City Center TIF District through a substantial amendment, requiring voter approval. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The City Center Urban Renewal Plan (CCURP) was adopted in 2006 with an active period of 20 years specified in the plan. After FY 2026, future debt cannot be incurred, thus the CCURP wouldn't be able to undertake new projects. However, the tax increment revenue (TIF) would continue to be collected until the existing debt is retired. The maximum indebtedness to undertake plan projects is $22M. As the district approaches the final six years of its planned duration, it has used roughly $10.4M of the approved maximum indebtedness. The CCURP was amended in 2017 to extend the district boundary, but no changes were made to the plan duration nor the maximum indebtedness. The pace of private sector development and TIF generation in the district have been slower than expected due to the deep recession soon after the plan adoption. The CCURP lists TIF eligible projects in eight categories: •Street Improvements •Streetscape Improvements •Bike/Pedestrian Facilities •Public Space •Public Facilities •Planning and Development Assistance •Property Acquisition •Property Disposition Of the 32 named infrastructure projects, 14 have been completed or are in various stages of planning. These include the Main Street and Burnham Street improvements, Universal Plaza, Rotary Plaza, and public restrooms. Only a handful of new infrastructure projects could be completed with the remaining authorized TIF, and that assumes additional funding sources (grants, SDC's, etc.). For example, $2.8 million has been allocated for Street/Streetscape and Pedestrian/Bike improvement projects, $1 million of which has been slated for Main Street Green Street Phase 2. This leaves limited funding available for other street related projects, which are usually expensive. In addition, the Town Center Developemnt Agency (ICDA) has been able to provide development assistance to one mixed-use project (Attwell off Main). More transit-oriented development and affordable housing is critical for the Downtown to develop as envisioned, so additional funding would enable the Agency to incentivize more projects. Goal 2 of the Tigard City Council for 2019-21 is "Invest and connect key areas of the city to promote economic growth and community vitality." Strategy 2.2 under this goal is to "Continue to make Downtown Tigard a place people want to be by making substantial progress on projects that attract new residential and business investment." Among the tasks to implement this strategy are: • Cultivate more relationships with future developers that share our multigenerational transit-oriented development vision. • Create an inventory of sites with high potential for transit-oriented housing redevelopment. •Evaluate the size and scope of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan to determine whether tax increment resources in the downtown are sufficient to meet council objectives. Prepare recommendations regarding the City Center urban renewal area's possible continuation. •Update the 2007 Leland report to accelerate downtown redevelopment, focusing on leverage possibilities from SW Corridor and other active transportation investments. This Council goal is being advanced through the City Center Futures Project with the help of consultants Johnson Economics and SERA Architects. The project consists of three parts: • City Center Urban Renewal (TIF District) Plan Analysis •Redevelopment Action Plan •Downtown Vision Update Johnson Economics' first task was the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Analysis. The firm investigated three options for the potential continuation of the district beyond 2027: Option 1: Increase the maximum indebtedness within the current District This approach would entail making a substantial amendment to the Plan in order to increase the maximum indebtedness. This will allow the District to take on additional debt over the life of the Plan to accomplish an expanded project list. Option 2: Close the existing District early and create a new larger TIF District This approach would require closing down activities of the District under the current Plan, as soon as practicable. A new larger district would then be adopted with higher assessed property value, long-term TIF revenue potential, maximum indebtedness, and budget for urban renewal projects. Option 3: Create a new TIF District after District expiration in 2027 This approach would continue the activities of the District under the current Plan until its end date in 2027. A new larger district would then be adopted with higher assessed property value, long-term TIF revenue potential, maximum indebtedness, and budget for urban renewal projects. After considering the status of the current district debt, remaining projects, and the Oregon state framework for urban renewal,Johnson Economics is recommending the TCDA pursue Option 1: extending the current TIF District with an increased maximum indebtedness. The biggest benefit to this option is that the current district is building increment (i.e. revenue capacity) on a comparatively low frozen tax base. This option therefore has a large advantage over a hypothetical new district that would require many years to build comparable TIF revenue due to a starting tax base that would be much higher than what the current district enjoys. The increase in maximum indebtedness would be a substantial amendment to the CCURP, requiring voter approval. Under Oregon statutes, an existing TIF District's maximum indebtedness can be increased up to 20 percent of its maximum indebtedness. In the City Center's case, this would be approximately $6.65 million ($4.4M (20% of$22M), plus 3% annual inflation since 2006). This would allow a total maximum debt of$28.65M after the amendment. With a $6.65 million increase, it would be feasible to fund more plan projects. Potentially, a modest number of new projects could be added, such as contribution to a new public parking garage, and anti-displacement investments. Alternatively, the 20% limit may be exceeded with the concurrence of taxing districts representing at least 75% of the permanent tax rate in the district. This would expand the number of CCURP projects that could be completed. In addition, a number of new street projects (including new streets called for in the Downtown Connectivity Plan) and more development assistance incentives for mixed use and affordable housing could be funded. The City Center Futures project includes a Redevelopment Action Plan that will identify priority TIF projects — both in the Plan, and potential new ones. This will assist in developing a list of projects with order of magnitude costs that will guide the sizing of the potential increase in maximum indebtedness. The Town Center Advisory Commission was briefed on this recommendation at their June meeting. If the Board is in accord with the recommendation, a Substantial Amendment plan and financial analysis could be prepared in preparation for going to the voters in the May or November elections of 2021. Staff would seek further direction from the board on the timing of such a measure at a future board meeting later this year. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The Board could direct staff to investigate another option. COUNCIL OR TCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS 2019-2021 Tigard City Council Goals Strategy 2.2 Continue to make Downtown Tigard a place people want to be by making substantial progress on projects that attract new residential and business investment: Evaluate the size and scope of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan to determine whether tax increment resources in the downtown are sufficient to meet council objectives. Prepare recommendations regarding the City Center urban renewal area's possible continuation. City Center Urban Renewal Plan Tigard Comprehensive Plan Special Planning Areas- Downtown Goal 15.2 Facilitate the development of an urban village. Tigard Strategic Plan Goal 2: Ensure development advances the vision. DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION This is the first Board meeting the project will be discussed. Fiscal Impact Cost: amount TBD Budgeted (yes or no): no Where Budgeted (department/program):TCDA Additional Fiscal Notes: The impact to the City of Tigard general fund would be about 40% of the amount of the increased maximum indebtedness. A 20% increase in maximum indebtedness would have an impact on Tigard's general fund of approximately $2.6M beyond what has been authorized in the original plan. A larger increase in maximum indebtedness would have a commensurately larger impact. City Futures Project Sean Farrelly, Redevelopment Project Manager Brendan Buckley, Johnson Economics City of Tigard Town Center Development Agency Board August 18, 2020 IL 1. TC DA CITY CENTER FUTURES PROJECT • Addresses Council Goal #2 for FY19-21 • Three parts o City Center TIF District Plan Analysis o Redevelopment Action Plan o Downtown Vision Update • District is in its last 6 years, it has used roughly $10.4M of $22M maximum indebtedness 1 +�.# r19\ p),g et.:4K\Z*, fii • "-,"_\;.- . 'Alt, vA,,..., • '. - ./) L % * -.1.:„ro\ .„,•-raw.,, 41 .t1 al • , . ...er.y.• • ' ..- '''.. - ,, i , .. 1 ..,..-;,,,,, ......"„,. _.: - ,.-. . v - 7 "WI It TIGARD _ ItrAlio `... v'i: --/ a',..'' '''tS; '›i;OS4 4°r --ji' . :, 6-,-_-,;:: "AP '4."7:C. +..-.7. /0.41". a ?I' ...-._. . . f , ii) CITY CENTER c � � �r.- , -7-4 - TIF DISTRICT N NNis:4 :rib. m,s„r e k '. 4 t,-6,,, '•' '6--,•-'.._.0.1 0i.'i(,i<4,0,e,Z-h,.1'f•*h.h i...,:r4,. _h-1_ 1_ FUTURE OPTIONS Cly . ► 4)44, 'J a: __ .. i /'l D 200 +co 6 , \. Or Aril' it 44 �r:+4 OPTIONS ANALYZED Option 1 : Increase the max. indebtedness, duration (Current District) Option 2 : Close District early, and create a new larger TIF District Option 3 : Create a new TIF District after District expiration in 2027 -r2 IIIIIIIII 11111.1'IIMMIMIMmm 4 .. ...._ I T-r_at eZ1). } ..rk ., 1-r4S AL41. 111111 tom 4. iyorT 117- 1 r • ilirwillr.sN � �L ■-�s � inFaI'l�t�����f��� l� /i-AirL � !' il � � . _ , 9gy ` ,3iy "�1 � s •' r � �- - i� y�� i ��� ■! ill rde ',70 1S ,Tos, f i �` 4=��� r-lam- .:fit vim' --- __-=-..--,~ 1 _ ,6�+ 1- � � Off , • tom► _ ��.'e�s' _ /4.i / libs Washington Square r NW Expansion (��r~"II Employment Corridor Area � ' NW Expansion Area � © ( _ . "1/L-‘ ,ii, \-, a.um.ami, .,• p� � r ,4\ .'7 1 pip \---) IN—.—.r•--2" i .7,-;-Ir- -r ....›, i■ .1P4 `„' I Triangle URA mow 1 , • ' CC URA :-)Hwy99 Commercial AN—IIIII Corridor Area \. / ' • * I SW Expansion 114\ \\iiii --, -1;,;,. Industrials 11 c' Residential Area Hunziker Area S Expansion 1 SE Expansion 1 . ..„ ,,.. .:!: CONSIDERATIONS til Ait,!°:., r,-.M1 0 • Limits on total size and assessed value ( 15%) 4 Jf:\ r, , Ir k l k • • Boundarycan't be expanded under current Plan , `,k: ° :' vIr k- Illi0. � , % }yi 'l,i.. / .r F. • Maximum debt capacity can be extended 20% b � :` '+ `�''. { +� .'Y I'i - {fl`, �'`�.�, + '4itimil 1 . 4 , Trk1 • All options require voter approval MAs2i,, r :f i. i . �t� Ai.!..,.-..:::',-?, r f F • ,;ice f. ` ! 9, i%4 - - Nis h d RECOMMENDED APPROACH OPTION 1 • Stronger TIF revenue potential; low baseline • Increase the max. indebtedness. 20% or concurrence. • Increase Plan duration and update project list. • Substantial amendment to Plan requires voter approval WHY INCREASE MAXIMUM INDEBTEDNESS? • With additional resources more plan projects could be undertaken • New projects could be added, including streets • Additional TOD and affordable housing developer assistance kt" ij gar, . /l„A, tp .. Io ■ 'law. .--..... .-',...,.„. -,..,,„, .4,, _,;„• ..4 s.: ',Apt, ....,4 r . , ' ,./.,,,'. ., 4%14.. . : * ...,., 74,„...,„.-40 :.\:,, 4:7. ."4',- "--'. t iii 0 ./ ,•;, ,0 1.3 ,,,,,fai' ,\A; . i - 101„1044,0 '- 4/ +r �1, . 111 , %0,* r S.. „ lra • • . ' ' .a , Questionsr Iho4I r�` a -,'•:per '1 c 10 t�, S. I y v/�/}} �� -t...:- AIS �. AIS-4352 7. Workshop Meeting Meeting Date: 08/18/2020 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: Receive Parks Master Plan Update Prepared For: Brian Rager, Public Works Submitted By: Marissa Grass, Public Works Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Workshop Mtg. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Receive Parks Master Plan update. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST This is an update for Council and no action is required. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Background The City of Tigard is updating the Parks and Recreation Master Plan which was last updated in 2009. The updated plan will address and incorporate the many significant changes over the past ten years that pertain to Parks and Recreation services. These changes include: The Parks Bond and a significant increase in parks acreage Over 100 acres of park land has been added since 2009, aided by the passage of the 2010 Parks Bond. The 17 million dollar Bond and was combined with over 6 million dollars in grants and other contributions funding the purchase of 8 new parks, the development of 6 parks and adding needed infrastructure to Summerlake Park.The Tigard park system now includes 270 acres of developed parks (+79 acres from 2009), and 234 acres of natural areas (+44 acres from 2009). A new Recreation Program In 2014, the City initiated a Recreation Program Study to consider the role that City of Tigard should play in providing recreation programming and services (e.g., classes, events, sports, recreation information). This included identifying community programming priorities and discussing potential sustainable levels of investment in future recreation services. The City has implemented the recommendations of this plan, establishing a program guide, working with contract service providers, and creating a well-attended set of community events. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan will integrate recreation activities into the forward-looking plan for the first time, making sure that parks and facilities in the system serve the recreational needs of the community. Planning for city parks The City has also completed concept master plans, providing guidance for the details of construction or improvement to individual parks, for most of the significant park sites in the system. At their simplest, these are conceptual designs that indicate the location of features, pathways and supporting infrastructure. More detailed master plans explore the physical, historical and community context and those get produced when the City is moving toward design and construction. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan can help prioritize implementation of incomplete or future parks and identify where older concept master plans need revisiting. Growth and changing demographics New residents bring new ideas, experiences and expectations. Increasing diversity magnifies these changes. While the community is still largely single family residential, as a significantly higher percentage of Tigard residents move into multifamily housing without private yards, parks will serve as both community gathering places and community member's backyards. As new areas of Tigard are developed utilizing current park standards, equity across the entire parks system can become skewed. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan can help to identify methods to maintain equity across the system and respond to the differing needs of new high density development and older less park-rich neighborhoods. A new funding source —The Parks and Recreation Fee In FY 2016, the city council voted to create this new fee that has helped fund park and recreation services. A sizeable portion of program funding continues to come from the City's General Fund and the council desires to discuss future funding of the program in the fall of 2020. Key Milestones rMilestone Status Park Condition Assessment COMPIF 1E State of Tigard Parks&Recreation Summary Report DRAFT 10-minute walk analysis COMPLETE Opportunities and gaps analysis IN PROCESS recreation Needs Summary Report OCTOBER2020 Recommendations and prioritization NOVEMBER 2020 Staff/Funding needs and strategies [ DECEMBER 2020 Parks and Recreation Program Organizational DECEMBER Assessment 2020 Public Draft Plan I FEBRUARY 2020 OTHER ALTERNATIVES Not applicable. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS This project will update and replace the Parks System Master Plan and Recreation Program Study. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Council has not been briefed previously on this project. Attachments Parks and Recreation Plan PowerPoint Presentation lig NNE EINI ION IOW # L A 0 IP L t Planning the Future of Parks & Recreation TIGARD Parks & Recreation Plan Update Process Public Engagement and Outreach Spring — Winter 2021 l l l l System Gap Analysis Recommendations Staffing, Inventory & Needs Assessment & Prioritization Funding & & Analysis Fall 2020 Action Plan Fall 2019 - Winter —Summer Winter 2020 2020 Fall 2020 Jr Jr + Jr Master Plan and Adoption Process Winter 2021 Scope & Schedule Updates / COVID- 19 Additional resources for adapting the public engagement plan and activities. 1 Updated Recreation 5-Year Plan Staffing and organizational chart State of Tigard Parks & Recreation Tigard Today 47% of Tigard 's residents are under 18 or over 55 ANL_ UNDER 5 65&OVER YEARS 14% 6% 5-19 YEARS 55-64 YEARS 16% 8,893 12% 0 6,664 20% 7,590 25% 35-54 YEARS • 20-34 YEARS 0 0 Q0 wij 'Q 11,266 7,590 17 YEARS&YOUNGER 65 YEARS&OVER 21 % 14% Tigard Today / Over 3 ,000 households ( 15%) live on less than $25, 000 per year / Over 7 , 000 households (34%) make over $ 100 , 000 HOUSEHOLD INCOME $200,000 OR LESS THAN MORE $25,000 $150,000 TO 7% $199,999 $25,000 TO 15% • $34,999 9% 3,096 $100,000 TO 2,084 $149,999 - 2,418 10% 18% 3,060 2,672 3,710 12% 1,906 1,475 13% 15% $75,000 TO $35,000 TO $99,999 $49,999 • $50,000 TO $74,999 Tigard Today RACE SOME OTHER TWO OR MORE RACE RACES AMERICAN INDIAN 5% WHITE AND ALASKA NATIVE 2% ASIAN • 04% NATIVE HAWAIIAN AND 8% THER PACIFIC ISLANDER 0.7% BLACK OR 1,002 AFRICAN • AMERICAN 339 '3,918 182 1.119 ■2,800 ETHNICITY FOREIGN BORN POPULATION Elc:j) s 5.765 45,590 I1M1 OE (--C; HISPANIC OR LATINO NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO NATIVE FOREIGN BORN 11 % 89% 86% 14% Tigard Parks & Recreation 2020 . . . ___ .... . _. : . . / 270 acres of . 4,.,„ . r-mrl- - , , .._, �I , , .`SII r I developed parks ' 1 i y..,, -• Senn Park } %'/ Merv9er I. - :..G. ~` _ (+79 acres from ,nnPark i ogle dP k ,.rr s I I`'- Eagan Park I - _1 -i 2009) I 5u k -�. Steve -� Park Street I '��` i' Irk ''''''''''-"---'-,N o W Property a'a i i =nark� ` • I ` ar�r / 234 acres of w JL5 C. \ Woods r C9rAmerical C tl Park Liberty � thview— Thoma:P Park -'Park10. Park _ Windmill yowler M.s, f ]]��,,,, Park Main Fish Aven7aFi, , I i.1 Jack Par Oog Pack - I r• 1 f., " 5ime1 Jim Griffith anal natural areas rlP Iia y-i r ill J • Paik 4. Skate Part '•m I `-I P k} i clot ,.a I '1 rs3eE5y 1 Potwl ` i Sabrina k : _, ProPerryl i '...V.,-,-,( Fann o o�` I /Oog Park If f r .. [reek Park 1(+44 acres fromSparFan a ;> L ,•e :" 'a IHo i Fields` 5; \ It 2009) —�r7Hostiak TI PakYLa_�_.h___. .i _ „= e Pith 1 i _/ Pdrk n141 ! �.-}-'I Elizabeth Prke Park Park r -� I na J '•Ja T`+ - rEallIwalny M.S. J ,I / 5 ears of ° •-.—•-- •--_r -dw E3 i- i He y Orchardxi i -r I /1 HeritagePark roln is i i i / D 1,' i ! Ike expanding `_�—���_ `� -� i Laslch recreation L.._. I H5 c �' programming <<�NI, - - Ja�aLIP Nrve t New Parks Over 100 acres of park land added since 2009 Well timed bond acquisition 4 New development r at River Terrace Park System Overview 3 % 16 FENCED0 MILES OF OFF LEASH SHELTERS AND TRAIL DOG AREAS PICNIC AREAS ilt ......0. •i i i i i, v.16 Neighborhood• ~• Serving Perks (58 acres) Nat Ages of . Natural Area (multiple sstes) 20 ICC ACRRES E 7Community Serving Parks I1 s9 acres) SKATEPARK PLAYGROUNDS 5 Future 5 Linear •• Parks Parks .9r,_ 4,,,,„r (53 arrest (53 acres) oe*1 3 . SPORTS FIELDS COMMUNITY GARDENS 2 5 TENNIS COURTS BASKETBALL COURTS Recreation Trends Explored / Social activities and community R _ , . •. involvement / Demographic changes Se`w .' / Health and wellness .. 47.'10 / Activating public spaces • � . :.v..�_ - { / Multi-use and dynamic parks Programs and activities m :: � ' `" l g / Park land in developed areas / Demand for trail-based activities / COVID- 19 Response Featured Trend : Programs and Activities Cities are getting more out of their parks and public spaces by providing programming. • Enhances community benefits of parks and recreation • Increases participation among underserved groups • Provides essential services to vulnerable populations • Activates public spaces Featured Trend : COVID-19 Response .. Key Considerations : Increase in demand for parks, M : , -f 4 „,. F , P J.,-- trails and open spaces . ttii''11Ptel • .... at Z Decrease in program and facility rental revenues Outdoors, green spaces and physical activity all demonstrated to reduce stress i 4 II- and improve mental health -_ `YS* 4'NY� CDC recommends keepingrr - public park facilities open given s �LL -�� the homeless populationtti7!4 reliance onp ublic restrooms 10 -Minute Walk Analysis 10-Minute Walk Analysis , , i/W c _ A- I Y i r -1 / i 1 "Every American __ _ ii should be within a I 10-minute walk of 7 ti a quality park - - 4 T 4 I / I ,.., L.. / I II / J ,. jp# / Tigard uses thisr--, , ' 1 * standard TI „� � w / Areas meeting I __ l i1 - = ) I L., I.I l I:_.,i I this standard w--, ' ro.-----ver4\ :I 1 r-z�� indicated in blue .---- ,!'_ it .y, i I - oa,,a } r J I~ 1.., JI 10-Minute Walk Analysis . ,1/4161. -- ,011 ' ` rll 1 r f� I Areas within a `�� ' . -- i a r. Li- 10-minute walk ,_.: of a major trail ` '� - `�� Ilki\° I Ted ,,,> 'ti ---r , - ' in light ~_� 1 .�f(V-M��`-'�'�' blue V ,J ' ._ tVit,A_. ; L 1 l I I il 1 ' a iii _ I —.— 3 I y'j I. L% I /1.----,__ i i rte/ ., % .aha 1 1 i 1 I L ' jaJ� `1 Ir-,..ii.mo •~ . k1_ 10-Minute Walk Analysis / Demographics Primarily employment area;not included in 10.minute walk analysis �� and housing ilaILL � . GP r i r ; "et&:" \N MO bir .1 , types for 12 m■ m • identified areas a -� ,=_os op7err- 4i i.4i . . " ` -% outside of 10- t.� _ _ J Italia;�7. v„616-7a,figiirr ,rat& * • O Jr minute walii k f� . � / Potential to guide ,_,, AO , f - p„,..iiir ' _E) ' , -„._,. .. .,._..-./416, ��t� decision-making -- lit !41, 0r� I o iffelftliii, ,7_411. —t, around Undeveloped portion of ______------------ River Terrace is not (___.- ■ included inthis analysis .���wg'A� ' _ '- \ Primarilyemployment • investments _ ! area;not included in _i L, to-minute walk analysis i ' tit •v.'1 I lig I Phase 1 : Community Engagement Activities Engagement Activities / Plan to Play: Opportunities 4'f ;I ,- -,,- ° • . : . ;. Av; Survey ��.. � :. > >",.. . , • - ., August 2019 January 2 02 0 ..col . .. „,�,�,,,�,„ a . r / Intercept Dot Exercise ,;:' :1„„ rpt% , 'x August2019 - A ; : yt6�..� i , Stakeholder Interviews •• A f _.,-:.. May 2020 '_ ,�' � ,,,,4,.. ': '�.. , E / Focus Groups ,,,,,Av_ , -, - ,ittf it March 2020 :y : .,. 5 •; .4I .. , / Map-Based Questionnaire ,. ..}s. a` Live Now! thh f. • �yryVILLE https://bit. ly/tigardparksandre creation What We Have Heard / Being surrounded by nature; walking/running/biking on trails is important / High use of trails, community parks, and nature / Desire for connected trails, unique play experiences, parks within walking distance and access to nature / Capacity and cost are constraints on the number of youth involved in sports 1 Equitable access for all abilities, ages and backgrounds is important in Tigard 1 Focus on activating park sites and supporting community- driven efforts / The city has done a lot with existing resources, needs additional funding to continue building and maintaining the system Opportunities & Challenges / Opportunities / Challenges Existing land and facilities Serving Tigard equitably / Evolving/growing recreation • Filling gaps in built community options / Funding a growing system / Complete and link trail systems ik Connecting neighborhoods Tigard Triangle renewal Sustaining system in recession I COVID-19 and close to home recreation • f., sy S5 iL 01 .. • ++ �� .. . * io 11,4 ioitl 1 ti * -. I. i iii It Illie •,.. , _. , ...7 • viii, A , 111 dillb ryIt 11111111ri • flitl*,, . • voirlir * s ,. Ai. . i.4 4174 i0 r a - t r ) • AW„ alf F01 • 11/ i , , .. i tholookmillii4 -111111116pg ' di di ler ".q , Ali - I" •06 AP:t 1 Ittoo .Of "lig I. t,