Loading...
Resolution 06-91 r , TIGARD WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION NO. 6-91 RE: Capital Improvements Plan On the motion made by Commissioner Audrey Castile , and seconded by Commissioner Bob Bledsoe , and passed by affirmative action of the Board of Commissioners, on this 14 day of May 1991 , Tigard Water District adopts the following resolution: WHEREAS, the District by Ordinance 11-90 established System Development Charges (SDCs) as a component part of meter installation income; WHEREAS, System Development Charges (improvement fees) as defined in ORS 223.299 shall be spent only on capacity increasing improvements, including expenditures related to the repayment of the debt for such improvements; BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Commissioners hereby approves the attached Capital Improvements Plan, effective July 1 , 1991; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, system development charges shall be spent only on those projects listed on the Capital Improvements Plan; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Plan shall be updated annually at the same time that the new budget is prepa Chair n of the Board , Jon Kvistad Attested to this 14 day of May 1991 , by: dministrator Tigard Water District ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 4380 S W Macadam Avenue.Suite 365 Portland.OR 97201 (503)223 3033•FAX 15031 274-6248 May 8, 1991 File#: 60030 Mr. John Miller Administrator Tigard Water District 8777 SW Burnham Road Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: 5-near Canital Imnrovements Plan Dear Mr. Miller: Pursuant to your request, Economic and Engineering Services has prepared the attached 5-year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) for the District. The CIP contains at least two alternative sets of improvements for each of the five years. In preparing this CIP, we have employed reports prepared by the writer in 1971, 1986 and 1990 after discussions with District staff to ascertain project work completed within the last '.ft., year and to ascertain projects that the District expects to be largely financed by property developers. All of the pipeline and reservoir projects proposed will increase the system capacity and thus may be financed from the full System Development Charge (SDC). It is our opinion that the telemetry system, however, may be financed from the reimbursement component of the SDC. The alternatives are proposed so that changes of events may be accommodated and the internal specifics to the CIP may be reshaped as the years pass. In each year, the total CIP cost is the same, regardless of alternative chosen. In order to make the total yearly cost equal, we have adjusted the amount reserved for future reservoir construction. A note on the last page of the CIP contains information on the minimum and maximum accumulation of funds into this reserve. Very truly yours, ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. �C. �..r Gilbert R. Meigs, P. . Olympia,WA Bellevue.WA Vancouver,B.0 Washington.D.0 Portland.OR EE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN Funded from System Development Charges 5-Year Plan May 8, 1991 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Estimated Proiect Cost Alternative A Al. Pipeline Extension: S.W. MacDonald Street Hall Blvd. to Pacific Highway, 5,100 feet of 24" D.I. pipe @ $72/ft $367,200 .4410, Justification: This is the last phase of the instal- lation of a 24-inch transmission main, paralleling a 16-inch main, (or 30-inch equivalent) from Lake Oswego's Waluga Reservoir to the 10-MG (terminal) reservoir located on SW 125th and Bull Mountain Road. This provides the district with its primary source of water supply, the Clackamas River via the City of Lake Oswego. The City of Tigard plans to widen McDonald this year and this pipeline should be installed prior to the widening. A2. Future Reservoir Site: Purchase 2 acres of land near Mtn. Gate subdivision on Bull Mountain for future 2.5-MG reservoir at elevation 550 feet above sea level 100,000 Justification: An engineering study of 1986 advised that sites for four (4) new reservoirs should be purchased before the land was taken up for houses. This is the last of the four sites to be purchased upon which a 2.5-MG reservoir project will begin FY 95/96. `"I 1 New ([ A3. Reserve for construction of future 2.5-MG reservoir to be located at S.W. 141st Avenue, between Beef Bend Road and Bull Mountain Road 36,000 Justification: The district has adopted a policy of paying for needed capital improvements from current revenue. Engineering studies of 1986 and 1990 advised that to keep up with growth, the district must construct a 2.5-MG reservoir near SW 141st on Bull Mountain. This will provide the district with a total of 23.5 million gallons of storage. The reservoir will serve all residents below elevation 350 feet above sea level on the south side of Bull Mountain. The expenditure is too large to accrue in one or two years and this is just the start in savings for that reservoir construction. Total, Alternative A X503.200 Capital Improvements Plan, continued 2 Fiscal Year 1991-92 Estimated Project Cost Alternative B B1. Pipeline Extension: S.W. 121st and Walnut Street, from Fonner to 135th Avenue, 5,600 feet of 24" D.I. pipe @ $72/ft $403,200 Justification: In the summer time, No. 3 reservoir will not fill because the pipelines serving it are too small. With high growth in this area, along with the requirement that water be pumped from the 132nd Street pump station to High Tor, it is deemed important that this main be installed as soon as possible. Additionally, fire flows are deficient in some parts of the area. The engineering study of 1986 recommended that this main be constructed. If the City defers the MacDonald street project, then this pipeline would be built. B2. Future Reservoir Site: Purchase 2 acres of land near Mtn. Gate subdivision on Bull Mountain for future 2.5-MG reservoir at elevation 550 feet above sea level 100,000 Justification: An engineering study of 1986 advised that sites for four (4) new reservoirs should be purchased before the land was taken up for houses. This is the last of the four sites to be purchased upon which a 2.5-MG reservoir project will begin FY 95/96. Total, Alternative B 1503 200 Capital Improvements Plan, continued 3 err E, Fiscal Year 1992-93 Estimated Proiect Cost Alternative A Al. Pipeline Extension: S.W. 121st and Walnut Street, from Former to 135th Avenue, 5,600 feet of 24" D.I. pipe @ $72/ft $403,200 Justification: See Project B1 for FY 91/92. If this project is not built in FY 91/92, then it should be built in FY 92/93. A2. Telemetry System: New telemetry system to monitor and record data about all pump stations and reservoirs 150,000 Justification: With the huge growth in the Tigard area it is now impossible to monitor the water system without an updated telemetry system. This system was recommended in the engineering study of 1971. It allows one person to monitor the water system at a glance. Problem areas can be identified immediately and resolved without long lag times. Major leaks and main breaks can be identified and located within minutes, instead of hours. Total, Alternative A $553.200 Estimated Proiect Cost Alternative B Bi. Pipeline Extension: S.W. MacDonald Street, Hall Blvd. to Pacific Highway, 5,100 feet of 24" D.I. pipe @ $72/ft. $367,200 Justification: See Project Al for FY 91/92. If the City of Tigard defers widening until FY 92/93, then this project should be built in FY 92/93. Capital Improvements Plan, continued 4 • (F, B2. Telemetry System: New telemetry system to monitor and record data about all pump stations and reservoirs 150,000 Justification: See Project A2 for this FY. B3. Reserve for construction of future 2.5 MG reservoir 36,000 Justification: See Project A3 for FY 91/92 Total, Alternative B $553,200 Estimated Proiect Cost Alternative C Cl. Pipeline Extension: S.W. Greenburg Road, Highway #217 to Bradley Corner, 4,000 feet of 24" D.I. pipe @ $72/ft ($288,000), including a 36" bore under Highway #217 ($72,000) $360,000 Nifty Justification: In the years ahead, the district will have to import more and more Bull Run water from Portland because Lake Oswego has limited capacity to serve both its own citizens and TWD. This 24-inch main will parallel an existing 16-inch main and will allow higher flow rates to be purchased from Portland to meet the demands of the district well beyond year 2000. An equivalent 30-inch main (16-inch plus 24-inch) was recommended in the engineering study of 1971. This line would be built in FY 92/93 if the City of Tigard cancels MacDonald street widening or if there is a material decrease in the supply for Lake Oswego. C2. Telemetry System: New telemetry system to monitor and record data about all pump stations and reservoirs 150,000 Justification: See Project A2 for FY 92/93 C3. Reserve for Construction of Future 2.5 MG Reservoir 43,200 Justification: See Project A3 for FY 91/92 Total, Alternative C $553200 Capital Improvements Plan, continued 5 Fiscal year 1993-94 (E, Estimated Proiect Cost Alternative A Al. Pipeline Extension: S.W. Greenburg Road, Highway #217 to Bradley Corner, 4,000 feet of 24" D.I. pipe @ $72/ft ($288,000), including a 36" bore under Highway #217 ($72,000) $360,000 Justification: In the years ahead, the district will have to import more and more Bull Run water from Portland because Lake Oswego has limited capacity to serve both its own citizens and TWD. This 24-inch main will parallel an existing 16-inch main and will allow higher flow rates to be purchased from Portland to meet the demands of the district well beyond year 2000. An equivalent 30-inch main (16-inch plus 24-inch) was recommended in the engineering study of 1971. If this line is not built in FY 92/93, then it should be built in FY 93/94. Nos A2. Reserve for Construction of Future 2.5 MG Reservoir 200,000 Justification: See Project A3 for FY 91/92. Total, Alternative A 060.000 N""" Capital Improvements Plan, continued 6 Fiscal Year 1993-94 (E, Estimated Proiect Cost Alternative B B1. Pipeline Extension: S.W. Greenburg Road, Highway #217 to Bradley Corner, 4,000 feet of 24" D.I. pipe @ $72/ft ($288,000), including a 36" bore under Highway #217 ($72,000) $360,000 Justification: See Project Al for FY 93/94 B2. Pipeline Extension: S.W. 115th Avenue, Walnut Street to North Dakota Street, 3,580 feet of 12" D.I. pipe @ $43/ft 154,000 Justification: This portion of the distribution system lacks a large main through it. Eventually this line would connect to a future 12" line on North Dakota, which would be an extension of an existing 12" line at S.W. 108th and North Dakota. The engineering study of 1990 recommended these lines. ,,w, B3. Reserve for Construction of Future 2.5 MG Reservoir 46,000 See Project A3 for FY 91/92. Total, Alternative B $560,000 Capital Improvements Plan, continued 7 Fiscal year 1994-95 (E) Estimated Proiect Cost Alternative A Al. Pipeline Extension: S.W. North Dakota Street, from 108th to 121st Avenue, 3,070 feet of 12" D.I. pipe @ $43/ft $132,000 Justification: This portion of the distribution system lacks a large main through it. This pipeline will connect to the line proposed for S.W. 115th, Project Bi, FY 93/94 The engineering study of 1990 recommended these lines. A2. Reserve for Construction of Future 2.5-MG Reservoir Justification: See Project A3 for FY 91/92 418,000 Total, Alternative A $550000 Alternative B �.- Estimated Proiect Cost Bl. Reserve for Construction of Future 2.5-MG Reservoir $ 550,,000 Justification: See Project A3 for FY 91/92 �""" Capital Improvements Plan, continued 8 r t�r: Fiscal year 1995-96 (E Estimated Proiect Cost Alternative A Al. Reserve for Construction of Future 2.5-MG Reservoir $550,000 Justification: See Project A3 for FY 91/92 Alternative B Bl. Reserve for Construction of Future 2.5-MG Reservoir $418,000 B2. Pipeline Extension: S.W. North Dakota from 108th to 121st Avenue, 3,070 feet of 12" D.I. pipe @ $43/ft 132,000 Justification: See Project Al for FY 94/95 Total, Alternative B $550,000 Note on Accumulated Reserve for Future Reservoir At end of FY 95/96, the least amount accumulated is estimated to be $882,000 and the greatest amount is $1,379,200. Accrued interest,if any, is not included. The reservoir is estimated to cost $1,300,000 at the present time. This does not include an allowance for inflation. It thus appears that construction could begin as early as the second half of FY 95/96. Capital Improvements Plan, continued 9