The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 09/22/2020 City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND TIME: September 22, 2020 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session; 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: Remote participation only. See PUBLIC NOTICE below. PUBLIC NOTICE: In accordance with the City of Tigard's Emergency Declaration related to COVID-19 and Oregon House Bill 4212, this will be a virtual meeting where Council and staff will participate remotely. There will be no in-person public testimony during this meeting. How to comment: •Written public comment may be submitted electronically at www.tigard-or.gov/Comments. All comments must be submitted before 4:30 p.m. the day of the meeting. •If you prefer to call in,please call 503-966-4101 to be placed in the queue.We ask that you plan on limiting your testimony to three minutes. SEE ATTACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVESTREAM AND ONLINE: http://www.tigard-or.gov/city hall/council meeting.php CABLE VIEWERS: The regular City Council meeting is shown live on Channel 28 at 7:30 p.m. The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND TIME: September 22, 2020 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session; 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: Remote participation only. 6:30 PM 1. STUDY SESSION A. PARK MAINTENANCE FUNDING DISCUSSION 6:30 p.m. estimated time B. BRIEFING ON WASHINGTON SQUARE REGIONAL CENTER UPDATE PROJECT 6:50 p.m. estimated time 7:30 PM 2. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 3. PUBLIC COMMENT A. Follow-up to Previous Public Comment B. Public Comment—Written C. Public Comment—Phone In 4. CONSENT AGENDA: The Consent Agenda is used for routine items including council meeting calendars, appointments to boards and committees and approval of contracts or intergovernmental agreements. Information on each item is available on the city's website in the packet for this meeting. These items may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Council members may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: A. PROCLAIM OCTOBER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH •Consent Agenda-Items Removed for Separate Discussion:Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council/Town Center Development Agency has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 5. AMAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP ZONING AMENDMENT: CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 7:40 p.m. estimated time 6. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR FINAL CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT (CDR) 7:45 p.m. estimated time 7. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE FINAL REFRESHED STRATEGIC PLAN 8:15 p.m. estimated time 8. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD - CONSIDER A CONTRACT AWARD FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELATED SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS AND TECHNOLOGY SERVICES TO TYLER TECHNOLOGIES 8:35 p.m. estimated time 9. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE CITY'S EMERGENCY DECLARATION RELATED TO COVID-19 8:45 p.m. estimated time 10. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION TO UPDATE THE TIGARD AID UTILITY BILLING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 8:50 p.m. estimated time 11. NON AGENDA ITEMS 12. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION 9:10 p.m. estimated time The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss labor negotiations under ORS 192.660(2)(d). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. 14. ADJOURNMENT AIS-4418 1. A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 09/22/2020 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Park Maintenance Funding Discussion Submitted By: Brian Rager, Public Works Item Type: Update, Discussion, Meeting Type: Council Direct Staff Business Mtg - Study Sess. Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall Council receive a briefing from staff related to park maintenance funding to help prepare them for the October 3, 2020 Budget Committee meeting? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff are requesting Council direction as to any other information they would like ahead of the October 3rd Budget Committee meeting. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY An updated issue paper related to the Park and Recreation Fee is attached for Council's review prior to the study session. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL OR TCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION This is the first briefing to the Council since the FY 2020-21 budget process. Attachments Parks Maint Issue Paper CITY OF TIGARD NI • TIGARD FY 2020-21 ADOPTED BUDGET—SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTAL Issue Paper: Parks Maintenance Needs—Current and Future Parks Land Additions Staff Lead: Brian Rager and Joe Barrett Impacted Department(s): Public Works 1. Issue Description—Long Term Funding for Parks Maintenance Over the past few budget cycles, staff has continued to layout the need for additional resources for parks maintenance. Copies of these issue papers and memos are attached for Budget Committee's review. To quickly recap the need, the city continues to purchase, acquire, and develop new park properties. In addition,private developers are constructing new parks as part of their development that will be added to the city's inventory in near future. As these park lands acres become city assets, the need to maintain them become the responsibility of the Parks Maintenance division. During Fiscal Year 2021, the Parks Maintenance division expects to take on 37 additional acres of maintenance,including: • River Terrace parks that came off developer warranty and became the city's maintenance responsibility, • Rotary Plaza and Tigard Street Trail which were completed and now require maintenance, • The Lasich property which,while owned by the city for a few years,has been maintained by a county contract in exchange for use as a staging area for a road project. The city assumes full maintenance this year as that project wraps up, and • Four sections of the Fanno Creek Trail. To address these additional acres, staff requested three additional FTE in the FY 2021 budget: 1.00 FTE for a Parks /Grounds Supervisor, and 2.00 FTE for Utility Worker IIs. The Budget Committee and the Council approved these positions for Fiscal Year 2021 and directed the use of reserves in the Parks Utility Fund to cover the cost for one year but did not dedicate or recommend additional revenue to form a long term funding solution for the positions. A long-term funding solution is needed in order to provide stability for these and future staff resources. From a staff perspective, that funding solution would come either from an increase in the Parks and Recreation Fee (PARF) or from an increase in contributions from the General Fund. Without additional revenue, the positions that staff is currently recruiting will not have funding come July 1, 2021. 2. History of the Parks and Recreation Utility Fee (PARF) The Parks and Recreation Fee (PARF) was approved by Tigard City Council on February 9, 2016, following a community conversation about declining general fund revenues and a concern for declining park conditions. The PARF revenue is critical to the health and maintenance of our parks as property tax revenues (in the General Fund) and all the pressures and needs put on them are not enough to cover all costs related to parks maintenance and recreation. The city's property tax revenue covers core services like police,library, community building and parks. When the city council adopted the PARF, they were able to shift some property tax revenue away from Parks & Recreation in order to fund some modest enhancements to other General Fund supported services. In order to reduce the amount of the PARF that is charged to Tigard citizens, the General Fund continues to cover approximately$2.2 million of the Parks &Recreation. The stated purpose of the PARF is: "to charge for the service the city provides in maintaining public parks and to ensure that maintenance occurs in a timely fashion, thereby reducing increased costs that result when maintenance is deferred"(Tigard Municipal Code 3.75.010). As more acres are added to the city's parks land inventory this stated goal becomes increasingly difficult without additional resources. As currently budgeted, these resources would come from either an increase in the transfer from the General Fund or from and increase in the PARF. The PARF, as outlined in the city's Master Fees and Charges Schedule (Fiscal Year 2020-21),is currently charged as follows: • Monthly Residential Rate— Single and Multi-Family $5.91/equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) (moves to $6.16 on January 1st)* • Monthly Non-Residential Rate: $5.91/EDU 184 2 (moves to $6.16 on January 1st)* • Reduction for Qualified Low Income Single Family: 50% Notes: 1. Commercial EDU Calculation (rounded to nearest whole EDU): (Billed Parking Stalls from Street Maintenance Fee * 0.76 Jobs Per Stall)/15 EDU Factor = EDUs 2. Industrial EDU Calculation (rounded to nearest whole EDU): (Billed Parking Stalls from Street Maintenance Fee * 1.19 Jobs Per Stall)/15 EDU Factor = EDUs * -Annual growth index applied. Increase was delayed by Council due to Covid-19 pandemic until January 1, 2021. Annual index is 4.26%. 3. Parks Maintenance Core Services The Parks Maintenance division is focused on providing safe and attractive parks and open spaces to residents and visitors. The division shares the city's strategic vision and strives to provide spaces that are inclusive, accessible, and promote outdoor healthy activities to the citizens of Tigard. Through the efforts of a well-planned maintenance program, the division ensures that Tigard's parks and open spaces are maintained in a lean and efficient manner. The division maintains the city's assets to the highest level achievable with the resources that can be afforded. Parks Maintenance is responsible for the following: • Day to day maintenance and operation of the city's 587 acres of parks land, • Maintenance and operation of the turf and sports fields as well as sport courts, • Maintenance and operation of picnic shelters and restrooms, • Ensuring the city's playgrounds are maintained and safe with routine inspections 4. Future Parks Development and Needs of the Division In addition to the new acreage that the Parks Maintenance division assumes responsibility for in Fiscal Year 2021, more acreage and new improvements that will require city maintenance are on the horizon. Emilia Park (1 acre) and Roshak Park (1.5 acres),both in River Terrace,will become the responsibility of the city by the summer of 2022. As many as five additional parks located in River Terrace are also on the city's radar but dates are yet unknown. In total, the River Terrace Master Plan recommends just over 19 acres of parks for that area. These parks will become assets of the city through development, so while no capital dollars were spent by the city to build them, there is a cost for their long-term maintenance. The city is also anticipating an influx of local"share dollars" from Metro for the development of new parks. Projects that have been identified by the city to use these dollars include: • The acquisition of park land in the Tigard Triangle, an underserved area of Tigard. • Steve Street Park—which is in an identified underserved area of Tigard, • Cook Park—Replacement of an aging playground structure, and • Dirksen Nature Park—Installation of a parking lot;installation of an accessible nature play near the ADA parking lot; and construction of a paved trail along Tigard Street. Other parks and open areas also continue to be programmed in the city's capital improvement plan for the next six years. Additional projects identified in the plan include Universal Plaza and Fanno Creek Overlook, both of which may be constructed beginning in Fiscal Year 2022. In addition to all of the aforementioned projects, the city is in the final stages of a new Parks and Rec Master Plan update that will identify further parks to be developed. The Master Plan, along with projects like Steve Street,will refine the parks system with an improving lens on equity and areas of the city that may be lacking in developed parks. The city has precious capital dollars in Parks SDCs and grants that go towards the development of our available parks land and we want to ensure we are spending those dollars in an equitable manner while providing new or upgraded parks to areas of the city where there may not be as many. Impact on Parks Maintenance All of these additional parks and projects will place additional responsibilities on the Parks Maintenance division and will require additional resources to simply ensure maintenance levels remain at current levels. During the Fiscal Year 2021 budget, staff introduced a decision package designed to simply"keep up"with current maintenance levels due to 37 acres being added to the city's inventory. The personnel in the decision were requested to meet the growing infrastructure of the parks system. Without the additional personnel a deterioration of quality throughout the entire system would occur... for both existing and new assets. This problem will grow quickly as more elaborate parks in the city center and River Terrace continue to be added and require a higher level of service. The request was for: • 1.00 FTE—Parks/Grounds Supervisor • 2.00 FTE—Utility Worker II • Additional Seasonal Worker • 1 Crew Vehicle • 1 Riding Mower • 1 Trailer • Increased water bills, electrical, fertilizer, seed,plantings, etc. Prior to these three positions, the city spent roughly 59% of the national average (National Recreation and Parks Association) per acre on park maintenance. The addition of these three positions and their associated materials (together the total dollars is $453,681) moves the city to 66% of the national average. Another way to look at that, even with three new positions, the city is spending only 2/3 of the national average per acre on parks maintenance. This is one of the key metrics the department can point to in order to measure its effectiveness with this very important body of work. Staff is not endeavoring to match the national average,but strongly recommends the City move closer to it than it is right now. It must also be noted that not all parks are developed equally-- some require higher levels of maintenance than others. Several parks currently in the CIP (Universal Plaza, Rotary Plaza, Steve Street) as well as the parks coming on board through the River Terrace development will be classified as Type I parks requiring the highest level of maintenance from the division. Without these additional positions, the ability of staff to sustain current maintenance levels will be impossible due to the higher level of service needs at these new assets. This will lead to very difficult decisions to reduce maintenance levels in lower-classified parks, such as the Type III (open spaces with trails) and Type IV (undeveloped parcels and open spaces) parks. For another option, the division may look to lower the maintenance levels across all park types; that is an operational decision made by the supervisor and manager. In addition to addressing the maintenance needs, a second Parks and Grounds Supervisor was included in the budget request and was added to address a long-standing span of control problem in the division. Currently,the position has 23 or more positions reporting to it in the summer and roughly 587 acres to oversee. The addition of a second Supervisor position is sorely needed and long overdue. In the world of parks maintenance,with crew spread throughout the city, one person overseeing more that 20 staff is an unsustainable model. 5. Long Term Funding for Parks Maintenance Positions Council and the Budget Committee approved the city's request for the three additional parks maintenance positions along with their associated materials and capital outlay needs. However, Council directed staff to utilize reserves for the Fiscal Year 2021 budget and continue long-term funding discussion for those positions. Staff plans to introduce the funding for these positions in the Fiscal Year 2022 budget request unless Council elects to raise the revenue before that. In order to cover the costs of the positions and their associated costs,roughly$453,681, the city has two identified sources: 1) Raise the Park and Recreation Fee (PARF) —in order to raise the needed funds, the increase to the PARF would be $1.52/EDU. This would create a total PARF of$7.43/EDU from current levels (not assuming the index scheduled for January 1st). This would result in an overall utility bill increase of 1.35% to the average customer (based on an average bill of $112.50). 2) Increase the Transfer from the General Fund to cover the costs. In FY 2020 the General Funds Transfer to the Parks Utility Fund was $2,220,000. The General Fund could increase it transfer to the Parks Utility Fund by the $453,681 to cover these new costs. This would be roughly a 20.60%increase in the General Funds transfer. 6. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Council and Budget Committee approve a long-term funding strategy for the three positions added during the Fiscal Year 2021 budget. Staff's recommendation is that the Council approve an increase in the Parks and Recreation Fee of$1.52 per EDU to fund these positions for years to come. The addition of new parks and parks improvements and the subsequent required park maintenance is essential to the livability of Tigard, and the improved values of private properties and businesses in Tigard. Parks are gathering places, and places where recreation and events of all types and by everyone can occur which help make living in Tigard more desirable. AIS-4419 1. B. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 09/22/2020 Length (in minutes): 20 Minutes Agenda Title: Briefing on Washington Square Regional Center Update Project Prepared For: Susan Shanks, Community Development Submitted By: Susan Shanks, Community Development Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Council Business Mtg - Study Sess. Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall Council receive a briefing on the Washington Square Regional Center Update Project? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST This briefing is for informational purposes only. No action is requested. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The Washington Square Regional Center Update Project has been officially underway since February 2020. As a reminder, the purpose of this project is to work with the community and project partners to refine the original vision—which is now over 20 years old—with the goal of facilitating more housing, employment, and transportation options that are consistent with Tigard's strategic vision to be a walkable, healthy, and inclusive community. The project will do this by: •Facilitating diverse community input that is representative of the area's population. •Working with businesses and residents to understand community priorities. •Analyzing and responding to emerging market trends. After the Local Contract Review Board awarded the project contract to ECONorthwest in February 2020, the project team finalized the scope of work and then almost immediately was forced to reevaluate the project's schedule and community engagement plan because of COVID-19. Since there was so much uncertainty and disruption in the those first several months, the project team did not attempt any outreach to businesses or residents but, instead, focused on completing various technical analyses and an alternative strategy for community engagement that assumed no in-person meetings. The project team finalized an Alternative Community Engagement Strategy in May 2020. See Attachment 1. The strategy is designed to be flexible and adaptive. Instead of providing a specific plan, it clarifies the project's community engagement goals and how they can be achieved under the current circumstances. It also identifies five distinct rounds of engagement and describes how detailed plans for each round of engagement will be developed as the project moves forward. The hope is that this will allow community feedback and lessons learned to inform each successive round of engagement. The project is currently wrapping up its second round of engagement. Round 1 involved reaching out to residents and business owners/operators to see if they had the interest and capacity to participate in a long-range planning project. In short, the project team found that residents were very interested in participating. It also helped (and was very appreciated) that the project was able to offer stipends to some residents and small business owners. Finding business owners/operators to serve on the project's Stakeholder Working Group (SWG) was more challenging, but the final roster includes a wide variety of business owners/operators from different parts of the regional center. Round 2 involved convening the SWG. See Attachment 2 for the full SWG roster. As of the writing of this report, two SWG meetings have occurred. Both were held virtually, well attended, and utilized simultaneous language interpretation for the two Spanish-speaking members. The first meeting was informal. It was designed for residents to get to know each other and become familiar with the project and the virtual meeting platform so that they felt comfortable and knew what to expect in the larger second meeting. The second meeting introduced and summarized the technical analyses completed to date, which are as follows: •Background and Conditions Report •Market Analysis Report •Subareas Opportunities Memo •Displacement Risk Memo •Ped Bike Transit Audit •Utility Audit All meeting materials and project documents are available on the project's webpage at https://www.tigard-or.gov/thesquare/. In order to help SWG members and other stakeholders understand and digest this material, the project team prepared an infographic of the key takeaways from the Background and Conditions Report and an executive summary of the remaining analyses. See Attachments 3 and 4 respectively. Staff will highlight some of these findings during the September 22 study session. The goal of this second meeting was to: •Share what the project team had learned about the regional center's existing conditions, opportunities, and constraints, including housing displacement vulnerability risk. •Learn from SWG members what works well and what needs improvement in the regional center. Subsequent rounds of engagement will reach out to the broader community to gather more ideas about the regional center's future. Initial feedback from the SWG points to a desire for improvements that would improve walkability, including transit and trail access, and uses and services that reflect its racial diversity, such as a multicultural community center. Despite the impacts of COVID-19, the project is currently on schedule. Staff anticipates the project taking 16 — 20 months to complete with the general timeframe being from February 2020 to May 2021, not inclusive of the legislative adoption process. See Attachment 5 for a simple project schedule and associated project tasks. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS City Strategic Plan Goal 2 — Ensure development advances the vision. City Council Goal 2 — Promote economic growth and community vitality by identifying and removing barriers to redevelopment in Washington Square Regional Center. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION •April 2019 — Council approved Resolution No. 19-14 directing staff to submit a Metro grant application for the Washington Square Regional Center Update Project. •November 2019— Council directed the City Manager to sign the Metro IGA accepting the grant award. •February 2020—The Local Contract Review Board awarded a contract to ECONorthwest for the Washington Square Regional Center Update Project in the amount of$300,000. Attachments Alternative Community Engagement Strategy Stakeholder Working Group Roster Background Conditions Summary Technical Analysis Summary Project Schedule WASHINGTON SQUAREREGIONAL CENTER Alternative Community Engagement Strategy Washington Square Regional Center Update Project City of Tigard I May 28, 2020 I. Introduction In light of COVID-19 and associated social distancing requirements, the city recognizes the need to modify its community engagement strategy for the Washington Square Regional Center (WSRC) Update Project,which has recently gotten underway. The majority of the funding for this project is provided by Metro through their 2040 Planning and Development Grant program (IGA Contract No. 936295). Exhibit C of the IGA Contract would need to be modified to reflect the alternative community engagement strategy proposed by this document. The city remains committed to meeting the goals of its original community engagement strategy as summarized below. • Engage as many stakeholders as possible from a broad and diverse cross section of property owners, businesses, residents, agencies, and service providers within and adjacent to the regional center, including historically underrepresented community members in Metzger. • Design an engagement process that results in project outcomes that reflect the diverse opinions of all stakeholder groups. • Build on and refine the land use and regulatory framework in response to market trends, city aspirations, and stakeholder priorities. • Coordinate with regional partners. II. Original Community Engagement Strategy The original community engagement strategy included a series of in-person meetings, events, and activities,which are not currently possible in the COVID-19 environment. The original elements of the strategy are provided below. Page 1 of 8 • 5 WSRC Stakeholder Working Group (SWG) Meetings • Metzger Community Outreach (e.g. door knocking) • 3 Metzger Community Events • 2 WSRC Open Houses • 3 Focus Groups • Stakeholder Interviews • Community Group Presentations • Online Surveys and Communications • Direct Mailings III. Alternative Community Engagement Strategy Given the uncertainty associated with the length of the social distancing requirements, coupled with the emotional and economic impact of COVID-19, the city proposes to modify how and when to engage the community on this project. The city used the following guiding principles to develop the alternative strategy with the assumption that traditional in- person meetings, events, and activities will likely not be possible or desirable for the duration of the project. • Sensitive Sensitive to the larger issues that the community may be experiencing because of COVID-19 and the related economic disruptions. • Safe Safe for all stakeholders and project team members through the use of social distancing, direct mailings, and technology. • Supportive Supportive of those stakeholders who have historically experienced barriers to participation and/or who may currently experience barriers to participation because of COVID-19 through the use of financial or technological assistance. • Meaningful Meaningful involvement of stakeholders through a combination of in-depth one-on- one interactions, small-group virtual meetings, and widely-dispersed short-format surveys. The details of the alternative strategy, including a comparison to the original strategy and a preliminary schedule, are on the following pages. A more detailed community engagement plan for the five distinct rounds of engagement identified by this strategy will follow once the project has completed some preliminary outreach and determined that the community has the capacity to participate. If it appears that the impacts of COVID-19 will prevent the project from meeting its stated engagement goals, other alternatives or a project delay will be considered. Page 2 of 8 Community Engagement Strategy Comparison The elements of the original strategy are bulleted below with the elements of the alternative strategy in italics underneath. The symbol in front of each italicized line denotes the overall change in level of effort (and budget) to implement each proposed alternative element as compared to what was planned for the original strategy. [+] = more effort [—] = less effort [NIL] = same effort • 5 WSRC SWG Meetings [+] A minimum of 2 virtual SWIG meetings with breakout groups, a minimum of 1 SWG cohort meeting (e.g. residents only),follow-up calls or surveys after each meeting, and ongoing pr ject interaction supported through a private online forum. Possible additional urban design charette centered around the mall site, specifically the transit center and stormwater opportunity sites. • Metzger Community Outreach [+] Similar amount of outreach but timing and methods adjusted for COVID-19, including but not limited to:direct mailings, online and phone surveys, displays at key neighborhood locations, social media postings, and community leader phone trees and interviews. More time and budget spent on supporting community leaders and gathering input through community outreach rather than at events. • 3 Metzger Community Events [—] Potentially 1 event—more if it is successful and cost effective—but timing and methods adjusted for COVID-19, including but not limited to neighborhood walks or outdoor gatherings. • 2 WSRC Open Houses [NIL] 2 virtual open houses. • 3 Focus Groups [—] 0 focus groups. More time and budget spent on other engagement efforts such as SWG support, Metzger outreach, and online engagement. • Stakeholder Interviews [NIL] Similar number of interviews but timing and methods adjusted for COVID-19. • Community Group Presentations [NIL] Similar number of presentations but timing and form adjusted for each group. Presentations may be done as virtual meetings or as email or phone updates. • Online Surveys and Communications [+] Stronger online presence with more frequent updates and more opportunities for online engagement across multiple applications. • Direct Mailings [NIL] Similar number and types of mailings, but additional mailings may be needed. TBD. Page 3 of 8 Alternative Community Engagement Strategy Preliminary Schedule with Project Tasks 2020 2021 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun-Sep Task 1 Project Management Scope I Contract Task 2 Community Engagement Task 3 Report Card ITask 4 Opp-Needs-Constraints Analysis I (Task 5 Land Use Framework Task S Metzger Rpt Task?Final Report on If \ . . ;`'' �0 0 AGENCIES fMTG } MTG % OPEN HOUSE 1 I 1 BUSINESSES ISING I OUTREACH I ' MTG I. I MTG I OPEN HOUSE I BUSINESSES{WSW I I OU-REACH I OPEN HOUSE f I OPEN HOUSE Y MALL J CHAREETE I I I f 1 . I '. 1 k: 1 RESIDENTS I SWG OUTREACH I. MEG '1, % MTG I OPEN HOUSE '� RESIDENTS IWSRC/Metzger� ' \, OUTREACH / ; \OPEN HOUSE/ '.OPEN HOUSE; - EMAIL/WEB UPDATES Update TASK3 Update Update TASK4 Update Update TASK5 Update Update Update Update Update SOCIAL MEDIA TASK DELIVERABLES I ENGAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES I OPEN HOUSE PC/CC _4 Terms and Symbols 0 Five distinct rounds of engagement with two major points of input during Rounds 2 and 4 o SWG = Stakeholder Working Group o WSRC = Washington Square Regional Center o METZGER = Metzger community o MTG = Virtual group meeting o OUTREACH = SWG membership outreach o 1-on-1 = Individual phone or video conference with each SWG member o PROJECT OUTREACH = Various types of engagement offering multiple points of project contact/input o OPEN HOUSE = Virtual open house o PC/CC = Planning Commission and City Council briefings Alternative Strategy Details Rounds of Engagement • It is expected that community engagement will need to be flexible and adaptive throughout the project in response to the evolving COVID-19 situation. As such, the project would develop separate plans for each round of engagement to allow community feedback and lessons learned to inform each successive round of engagement. Page 4of8 Stakeholder Working Group (SWG) • In lieu of 5 SWG meetings, the project would convene a minimum of 2 virtual SWG meetings with breakout groups during Rounds 2 and 4. Timing of SWG meetings would allow members to learn about and comment on the current project task and provide direction on the next project task. These major touch points with the project would be augmented as follows: o Business and Resident SWG members would be called by a project team member prior to the first SWG Meeting to learn about the project, ask questions, and complete a short interview. o Resident SWG members would be convened in a smaller group setting prior to the first SWG meeting. o All SWG members would have access to an online private interactive forum where they could post questions, provide comments, and interact with one another and the project team outside of scheduled meetings. o Follow-up surveys or phone calls would be conducted after each meeting. • The project would also consider additional SWG or SWG cohort meetings during Rounds 3 and 5 depending upon need and budget. • In order to support meaningful and successful participation by SWG members from historically marginalized/underrepresented communities, the project would work to understand how best to support these members and ensure their voices are heard by: o Asking them what they need to effectively participate, e.g. technology, training, interpretation services, childcare, etc. o Providing stipends to compensate them for their time and effort. ($500/member for up to 8 members) o Committing professional resources to build their leadership capacity, advocacy skills, and understanding of city planning. o Providing time on all SWG meeting agendas for representatives to report on what they've heard from their community networks. o Asking them to help shape the project's engagement strategies and methods. • SWG Membership would be as follows: Resident SWG Membership: 1. Former WSRC SWG member 2. Current Planning Commissioner and Metzger community member 3. CPO 4M member 4. Apartment or renter resident— identiO need for stipend or technology/training Page 5 of 8 5. Hispanic resident— identib need for stipend or technology/training 6. African American resident— identift need for stipend or technology/training 7. Youth resident— identift need for stipend or technology/training 8. Additional community leaders as needed to reflect the diversity of the community TBD 9. Community organizations TBD Business SWG Membership: 1. Macerich (Washington Square Mall) 2. Lincoln Center 3. Greenburg business 4. Cascade business 5. Nimbus business (Beaverton?) 6. Nimbus business (local serving? minority owned?) — identifi need for stipend or technology/training 7. Hall business (local serving? minority owned?) — identift need for stipend or technology/training 8. Banker, broker, builder TBD 9. Business organizations TBD Agency SWG Membership: 1. Washington County 2. Beaverton 3. Metro 4. ODOT 5. TriMet 6. CWS 7. TVWD (Optional) 8. Tigard Water District (Optional) Metzger Community Outreach/Events • In lieu of 3 Metzger community events, the project would: o Enlarge the Resident SWG membership to include more members from historically marginalized/underrepresented communities and commit staff and financial resources to support them. o Potentially hold one outdoor event, such as a neighborhood walk or outdoor meeting. Potential topic of discussion: transportation needs and priorities. o Pursue other forms of engagement suggested by SWG members or other community members or organizations. • In order to help the project reach and hear from historically marginalized/ underrepresented communities, the project would: Page 6 of 8 o Utilize existing community contact lists developed by Verde and Unite Oregon to cultivate interest in serving on the Resident SWG and feel the temperature of the community to determine how best to proceed. o Ask community leaders and/or SWG members to directly assist with the project's engagement efforts, including but not limited to conducting interviews with members from their community. The project would compensate them for their time and effort. • It is expected that community engagement methods would need to be flexible and adaptive throughout the project in response to the evolving COVID-19 situation. Community outreach methods include but are not limited to the following: direct mailings, emails, online and phone surveys, displays at key neighborhood locations, social media postings, and SWG/community leader phone trees and interviews. • At a minimum, the project would attempt to discover the following information from the community through interviews or surveys in such a time and manner that their input helped shape project outcomes: o Neighborhood concerns and aspirations o Neighborhood transportation needs and priorities o Land use scenario preferences • Initial phone calls, mailing(s), social media posts, and associated website links would: o Introduce and describe the project o Provide a community snapshot o Ask residents to complete an online or phone survey o Ask residents for contact preferences (phone, email, text, mail) and contact information for project updates or follow-up surveys o Ask residents if there are other groups or people that the project team should contact. • Since responses to initial phone calls and mailing(s) would be critical to the success of the engagement effort, the project team should discuss how best to incentivize and support participation,including but not limited to the following: o Financial incentives (e.g. Visa cash cards) o Language access o Mailing design (including return address and return postage) Business Outreach Prior to COVID-19, the project sent out two letters to almost all businesses in the Washington Square Regional Center Plan District, followed by emails to a smaller subset of mostly owner-operated businesses that were geographically dispersed within the regional Page 7 of 8 center. This effort resulted in a number of interviews, a meeting, and a potential SWG member. Similar to the community outreach strategy, the business outreach strategy would need to be flexible and adaptive but could probably rely on more traditional engagement methods in many instances, such as direct mailings, emails, and virtual meetings. The project would rely on existing City of Tigard and City of Beaverton business contacts, including business license information, and those from the Verde and Unite Oregon contact lists. Urban Design Charette This event was not identified in the original scope of work. However, given the current circumstances, the project is taking the liberty of assuming that the Washington Square Mall would have been identified as a key opportunity site for redevelopment had the original community engagement strategy been able to run its course. With this in mind, the project proposes to engage Macerich, i.e. the mall owner, and perhaps others, e.g. SWG members,in a charette that potentially focuses on two aspects of redevelopment about which there is known public interest and implications, namely: o Transit-Oriented Development (TOD), including transit center re/location o Stormwater Management A TOD charette presents a unique opportunity to explore how the transit center could, in the future, serve as a true "center" for the regional center if provided with the right urban design framework that was supportive of transit-oriented development. This work would inform the land use scenarios developed in Task 5. Key agency and consultant team members would be as follows: o TriMet (Transit access and improvements) o CWS &Tigard (Stormwater management) o SERA Architects (Urban design) o ECONorthwest (Transit-oriented development) IV. Alternative Community Engagement Strategy—Next Steps • Re-evaluate project scope, schedule, and budget in light of the Alternative Community Engagement Strategy. • Research virtual meeting platforms that support breakout rooms and language interpretation. • Develop Round 1 community engagement plan. Page 8 of 8 WASHINGTON SQUARE REGIONAL CENTER UPDATE PROJECT Stakeholder Working Group (SWG) Roster SWG Meeting#1 I August 26,2020 Name Affiliation Breakout Group#1 Steve Faust(facilitator)—3J Anna Gordon (notetaker)—Verde Courtney Acostagrates (interpreter) Brian Feeney(consultant)—3J Maria Yeni Dolores Resident, Metzger School Parent Rocio Dolores Resident, Metzger School Parent Kati Cline Kati's Cakes (Nimbus business) Gene Tupper Geotechnical Resources Inc(Nimbus business) Mohamed Bahamadi HAKI Community Organization Tom McGuire Tigard Asst Community Development Director Mike Williams Beaverton Economic Development Manager Suzanne Savin WA County Senior Long Range Planner Breakout Group#2 Becky Hewitt(facilitator)—ECONorthwest Rachel Miller(notetaker)—Tigard Jess Zdeb (consultant)—Toole Sabrah Seif Resident, HAKI Community Organization member Dolly Specht Resident,Tigard Committee for Community Engagement Linda Dove Bethlehem House of Bread Scott Fouser(unable to attend breakout group) Developer/Entrepreneur Maria Halstead WA Square Mall (Senior Property Manager) Lloyd Purdy Tigard Economic Development Manager Steve Kelley WA County Senior Transportation Planner Marah B Danielson ODOT Senior Planner Brian Harper Metro Grant Manager Anna Slatinsky Beaverton Planning Division Manager Breakout Group#3 Susan Shanks (facilitator)—Tigard _ Oscar Saucedo-Andrade (notetaker)—ECO Martin Glastra Van Loon (consultant)—SERA Amina Abdirahman _ Resident, HAKI Community Organization member Jamie Noelle Watson _ Resident,Tigard Planning Commissioner Rachael Duke Community Partners for Affordable Housing Jacob Knudsen WA Square Mall (Asst VP Real Estate Development) Jeff Grow ServerLogic(Greenburg business) Guy Benn TriMet TOD Program Manager Jean Senechal Biggs Beaverton Transportation Planning Manager Chris Faulkner(unable to attend meeting) Clean Water Services Water Resource Program Manager rZIL WASHINGTON SQUARE = � :Sul--11"1411111(42M-11111, , •� i��PN1Original 1999 Vision R' A�A•TIN V WY -_ta • ill�� REGIONAL CENTER t `j"H'� �� • Dynamic 18-hour place ,04,OT05 las lien lifiti dk. �; A , 11 • Compact and dense ti@ I ?M� ••` at • Lots of housing and The Washington Square i ��r i.;mim ® transportation options i ''Imi� IIIE�— SVD _3 • Regional access and local 1 Regional Center (WSRC) is �� Ii�.rE"`�`" y '! S"RD_1�, IIi_ , rr connectivity a significant employment _ -°�"�'' �s<< _ nt L o, - - II '� DENNEY RD and retail center. R•T RD ". I� W`_ MDL•TNOMAH,BLVD" g ^ 1,16 11-.J .,„,, HOME•RD?- � I �� Beaverton 1" , ■�`,- ° Washington Count;' we I It provides vital jobs and services rp.__-._ __ =P _; ��„I�.-__s. _ salla= i�11� ��iF/e / I WSRC ■rCi 111 for our local community and the 1FRRDDKMA.N.ST w1 �� JI FF r�C. .•U I/:� r L•ORS•FIRR'Rpa region. 1� ��17�t a 3Q�}a�� 1 p4<<e o, mom , l i @ E = Who works here? The number of employees and businesses in the regional 1 4,456 994 center has declined by about 12%since 2003.Salaries across all industries have declined as well.The lowest paid employees made up roughly one third of the 2018 workforce le g Total (over 5,000 employees),and earned 33%less than their 2003 Tota I Jobs Businesses counterparts. Share of Employment by Sector 2003-2018 Average Salary 2003-2018 $73,549 $56,182 22-33% Technical&Professional $30 264 Salaries $20,257 across all Retail&Consumer-Related • industries have declined between 22 $` Q Manufacturing&Skilled Trade $88,269 67,122 -33%since Mr 2003. ■2018 ■2003 Who lives here? The regional center population is growing and changing. It is home to larger families and more 1 I 1 1 single person households as compared to the rest of Tigard. It is also home to a growing Black/ African American population. Regional center residents are more likely to rent than own. Total Population WSRC Median Income Race 4% 51 ,355 35% WSRC WSRC Total Population City of Tigard 28% City of Tigard City of Tigard 24% zz% 21%zz% 15% 15% 13% 22% 5% 10% 11% 7% 6% ■ 2% M 1% _ 0% _ <$25k $25k-50k $50k-$75k $75k-$100k >$100k White Black or African Hispanic or Asian Alone Other American Alone Latino Age Distribution Household Size Tenure Age WSRC City of Tigard ir 33% 26% 63% Renters C 2 t 19 30% 24% tw 19% 38% 20 to 59 26% 22% 40% Renters 60+ 13% 21% Tim+ 48% 37% City of Tigard WSRC City of Tigard The WSRC Update Project will The WSRC is work with partner agencies, Learn More! a key building businesses, and residents www.tigard-or.gov/thesquare block in our local to understand community1111 .0 and regional growth priorities, respond to emerging Contact: i management strategy, market trends, and help emphasizing growing facilitate development that is Susan P.Shanks,Senior Planner up,rather than consistent with our local and SusanS@tigard-or.gov growing out. T I GA RD 503-718-2454 regional vision for the future. e . • . . . To . _ . - . . . . , . _ . . . _ . . . L . . S{ t4 i} S4 . ., RE , : , . . .. . _. . .,. ..,,, . 0 ___ „,„„,..„,„5,.,..„.„.„.„,::-..,.*1'• ' R •,,..t..1181101%.„...,- . - • E G i . . .,..„„_.,,,,.„ .. A L C . . . , E R ,..„..„. .,...:„..„,„,.„. .„,„„„,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,‘„,„,,,-„,,,,,:.,....... • Existing Conditions, Opportunities, and Needs Highlights from Work to Date .August 18, 2020 INTRODUCTION Washington Square is one of eight regional centers in the Metro 2040 Growth Concept.The original regional center plan, which was developed in 1999, envisioned the area as a dense and walkable commercial hub, with lots of housing and mixed use development served by high quality transit. The main tenets of the original vision °' remain valid, but Tigard believes an update is necessary given the significant ex ttri changes that have occurred in the past 20 years with how we shop, travel, and work �V r; The original vision also lacks an equity lens and did not anticipate the housing or climate issues that we are facing today. �; Tigard believes that the Washington ` ' Square Regional Center (WSRC) has the potential to change and grow to better j ' ' .; ` g serve the community and needs an updated plan to guide its development into the future. The purpose of Washington Square ; -� �� Regional Center Update Project (Project) is to work with the community and Project partners to refine the original vision with the goal of facilitating more housing,. employment, and transportation options }_ that are consistent with Tigard's strategic vision to be a walkable, healthy, and inclusive community. WSRC Location and Context rci Sourc--City'of o iga. This document summarizes highlights from work completed to date, including: • Existing conditions, including current land uses and who lives and works in the area 6 Market conditions and re/development opportunities in the area • Initial findings about vulnerability to housing displacement due to redevelopment or rising rents 6 Infrastructure needs, including transportation and public utility deficiencies and barriers • Challenges with implementation of the original plan THE WSRC TODAY Who Lives and Works hi the WSRC? The regional center population is growing and changing. It is home to both larger households and more single person households as compared to the rest of Tigard.The current residents of the regional center are more likely to rent than own and tend to have more modestly valued homes than the rest of Tigard. There are more households with somewhat lower incomes and more younger residents as compared to the rest of Tigard. The regional center is also home to a growing Black/African American population. The number of employees and businesses in the regional center has declined by about 12 percent since 2003. Salaries across all industries have declined as well.The lowest paid employees made up roughly one third of the 2018 workforce—totaling over 5,000 employees—and earned 33 percent less than their 2003 counterparts. Lincoln Center consistently has the highest number of employees per acre, and Washington Square Mall consistently employs the greatest number of people. Current Land Use and Recent Development The WSRC study area is largely developed. The majority of the land in the regional center is devoted to commercial activity. Almost all n , ', �+ fi 4P commercial buildings were built before thew $ r { X original 1999 plan.There are very few vacant � T ` Ofr s t + buildable sites remaining. Much of the vacant land in the area is constrained by wetlands or lacks transportation access. ` . The area remains auto-oriented, and there has ,a been some recent large-format retail development (including car dealerships)that may not be consistent with the vision. Still, many of the ,{� r ` existingsurface lots are over-sized relative to Aiftfrr1 � ° parking needs.There has also been some ` u �f tiff a. 'r�'� � P. residential infill development over the years since the plan was adopted, including one recent andW'";,,;,.,1.= ' - :•�� a. � •. . relatively large multifamily development. WSRC Study Area MARKET CONDITIONS & DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES A Changing 'il Landscape The concentration of existing retail space in the area—particularly the Washington Square Mall—creates a destination that draws people from outside the area.This, along with a location at a highway interchange make the area relatively attractive for retail serving southeastern Washington County. However, recent retail trends suggest dramatic shifts occurring in the suburbs, especially around suburban shopping centers and malls. Demand for urban-style living and experiential and entertainment retail has increased over the past several years, coupled with the closure of big box stores.The COVID- 19 pandemic has exacerbated these retail trends but is also threatening experiential retail and restaurants. Assuming a return to demand for experiential retail and entertainment following the COVID-19 pandemic, the WSRC is well poised to take advantage of these trends. Although the overall demand for retail space is likely to hold or decline, some new, smaller retail spaces could be built (on their own or as part of a mixed use development)that are better tailored to the format and amenities that are currently in demand. Employment Areas in Transition New flex or industrial development is unlikely in the WSRC due to a lack of vacant sites large enough for this type of development, which typically can't afford the cost of redevelopment.The area is also challenged compared to other nearby competitive areas for production and distribution businesses due to traffic congestion. While the existing flex and industrial buildings are likely to remain in the near future, trends indicate that demand for space in these existing buildings is likely to be driven by office- oriented business, repair businesses, fitness and recreation uses like gyms, and smaller e-commerce and distribution-related companies with moderate storage and shipping needs. The existing office parks in the WSRC provide lower rents than some adjacent employment areas (e.g. Kruse Way). Vacancy rates are high, and some of the space has begun to transition to other uses, such as specialty retail, indoor recreation, and light manufacturing, indicating reduced demand from traditional office users, such as professional services companies.These business parks have limited opportunities for redevelopment, but offer potential for property owners to improve and modernize the office space and common areas to attract tenants who would otherwise look elsewhere in the region. Mixed Use (Re)Development Potential Most large-scale redevelopment opportunities in the study area are on large commercial sites with underutilized surface parking lots, such as the Washington Square Mall (Mall) and around the edges of the Mall on SW Greenburg Road and SW Hall Boulevard.The Mall site itself offers the greatest potential for redevelopment.The Mall owners will need to find other uses to keep the mall successful as times get increasingly challenging for retailers.They have available land in the large parking areas surrounding the Mall and can create a master plan that leverages both new and existing development.The Mall owners have already proposed redevelopment on the southern portion of the site, with a second phase potentially including residential development. Over the long-term, this redevelopment could expand to include a mix of uses, such as office, residential, retail, entertainment, and hospitality.These types of amenities and a concentration of activity could help support both residential and commercial development throughout the WSRC. Residential infill Potential Recent and pending development shows fairly strong demand for residential development (apartments, rowhouses, and detached houses)that is consistent with the vision for the area.There are smaller-scale residential infill opportunities in the surrounding neighborhoods that could support medium-density housing if permitted by zoning. DISPLACEMENT RISK What Displacement and Who is At Risk? With new development occurring in the WSRC, some existing residents in and adjacent to the regional center may be at risk for displacement. Displacement occurs when a household is forced to relocate as a result of changes in the housing market, either because their housing is being redeveloped or undergoing major renovations or because their housing costs are increasing faster than they can afford. Renters are at greater risk because, even after the passage of statewide renter protections, they are still subject to changing market conditions and property owners' decisions about redevelopment, remodels, rent increases, etc. (Note that although displacement of businesses is also an important consideration in this context, it is outside the scope of this effort.) Vulnerability to DisplacementIn WSRC and Metzger Out of the more than 4,000 existing housing units in the study area,'roughly 300 (about 7 percent) are renter-occupied units located in older buildings with just a few units and lower property values. If redevelopment is allowed under zoning and is financially viable, these renters could be at risk of physical displacement. However, these properties are mostly fairly small and scattered throughout the study area, making a concentrated area of redevelopment unlikely. Many more of the housing units in the area (roughly 1,575 or 38 percent) are rental units in older properties without rent restrictions. If new investment in the area triggers rent increases for existing housing,the households in these units could be at risk of economic displacement. Similar to renters in the rest of Tigard, nearly half the renters in the area are already cost-burdened, and may struggle to absorb additional rent increases. In addition,the Black/African-American residents in the area are more likely to face housing discrimination and have difficulty finding new housing than White residents. Additional Analysis Additional analysis will focus on understanding how many households may be susceptible to displacement if market conditions change or redevelopment occurs.This analysis will come later in the planning process. It will evaluate the impact of potential public investments and changes to development regulations on the housing market based on land use scenarios generated by the community and the project team.The planning process will also identify measures that Tigard and Washington County can take to prevent displacement for existing renter households who may be at risk. 1 The study area for displacement risk encompasses the Washington Square Regional Center,the adjacent Metzger neighborhood,and a small residential area north of Hall Blvd and west of Scholls Ferry Road. INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS Transportation 4 There is good access to the WSRC t k -,`, < from around the region, especially , las ...- Hwy 217 and by car, but travel within the area ..rte ,: *' Mall are large is difficult for all modes of travel, a physical barriers but especially for people walking Difficult access to v . ,� and biking, due to barriers created WES station by existing development, major forwalkers .v.i a and bikers k,,,,,,„,*-,,_-,-' �3� �' } � � } roads, train tracks, and Fanno �, ��,vt 4afr Creek. , e ; .� `C 1'y, 1 5 H 'x`,h1 '- The bike and pedestrian networks 4 °\ 1 „ p,e��t Limited access `-x I -: '' } ; : } are disconnected and, in some l';',-.'it ` 'yam ;> Minimal between P&R l;. , °t ,.,i„ .„„,,,,i,,,---' sidewalk places, non-existent. Existing bike and Transit ,-.Ii !.� % network i �- lanes have gaps and difficult Center for I�/ I �� ? , g p walkers and tt }1 .fit •',� intersections. Bike lanes are also bikers ,,,}4 . 1 a not comfortable for most people on these higher-speed, higher- M°iA *'�4 '.; .. i J iter/41E4 volume roads. There are nearly no 4-.','-'-''''' * Zt , � sidewalks within the Metzger Large roads w/ -' . sidewalk gaps, x4 t A,kx ',' neighborhood, the Mall, around ,>-;.,,,,.,:t„,,,,,,,,_,:.:7 -,,,,-;,,,,„,.l few crossings, the WES Transit Center, and the deficient bike lanes and kft T Lincoln Center office park.The ,x intersections.,,,,,,.-„;%,';-- �, f >? Fanno Creek Trail is the only - , treatments 4E ;, �1 � continuous north-south route _ . available for people walking and 2a•' # biking. Existing crossings of `1-,J , u-grew .,. Highway 217 offer narrow Existing Barriers and Challenges sidewalks next to high-speed traffic, Source:SERA AArchita'„'ts making walking unpleasant. Transit service is present but poorly integrated. The area is served by multiple bus lines and the WES commuter rail, but the WES station and the Transit Center are separated by Highway 217, and neither offers many amenities for riders. A park and ride lot located between the two is difficult to access by foot from both. In addition, the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project is being planned for elsewhere, making the WSRC one of two regional centers not served by light rail. Planned projects for the WSRC would address many of these issues, but many of the recommended transportation and transit projects from the original plan have not been implemented due to cost, complexity, or controversy. For example, two projects from the original plan—the Washington Square Loop Trail and northern Highway 217 overcrossing—are not identified in any of Beaverton's plans. Moreover, other projects in Tigard's transportation system plan may make walking and biking worse rather than better. Later phases of this project will recommend updates to the planned projects for this area to better address walking and biking needs with projects that are more realistic to implement. Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Multiple public agencies provide public utility infrastructure in the area.The cities of Tigard and Beaverton share responsibility with the Tualatin Valley Water District for water and with Clean Water Services (CWS)for sewer and stormwater. There are several infrastructure deficiencies that could create barriers for (re)development in the WSRC in the near- and mid-term. • Stormwater: Most existing development in the WSRC was originally built when there were minimal (if any)stormwater regulations and is far from meeting current stormwater standards. The large parking lots and buildings,which block rainwater from filtering into the ground, increase the need for stormwater treatment (to remove pollution and improve water quality) and detention (so that water reaches streams more gradually). Redevelopment of these impervious areas will need to meet current stormwater standards, which will be challenging due to the lack of open space and vacant land for stormwater facilities. However, there may be opportunities for regional or shared facilities and for incorporating stormwater into landscape features on the Mall site and other large properties as redevelopment occurs. • Sewer:Two main CWS sewer lines (the Fanno Creek and Metzger Interceptors) currently have insufficient capacity,which may restrict certain development. Future development should look into any downstream deficiencies and work with Tigard and CWS on needed improvements. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS & CHALLENGES Implementation of the original vision has been challenging. Key reasons include: The regional center is large, and spans three jurisdictions. Even the boundary of the regional center itself is not clearly agreed to by all jurisdictions. n Existing zoning and development standards, which were adopted as a result of the original 1999 plan, were intended to facilitate more intense mixed-use, pedestrian-oriented development, but some standards may be problematic. In addition, more than a dozen zones regulate development in the area. Additional analysis will identify barriers in Tigard's zoning code that could be hindering desired development. • There is no dedicated funding source to build the original plan's recommended projects, and there are competing demands for public investment from both Beaverton and Tigard. Downtown Beaverton, Downtown Tigard, and the Tigard Triangle have been the focus of recent planning initiatives and public investments, which will likely attract private investment to these areas over the WSRC. n■ WASHINGTON SQUARE J REGIONAL CENTER Washington Square Regional Center Update Project Project Schedule 2020 , 2021 Spring Summer Fall Winter Spring Summer Fall Document Existing Conditions Evaluate Opportunities,Needs,Challenges Develop Future Land Use and Transportation Ideas I Produce Recommendation Report — Take Recommendations to City Council Community Engagement • Stakeholder Working Group Meeting 0 Potential Additional Stakeholder Working Group Meeting . Community engagement includes phone calls,interviews, online surveys,presentations,open houses,displays, mailings and electronic communications. r - TIGARD Meeting of the Tigard Council September 22, 2020 Public Comment Received Submitted By Date Received Subject 1. Stoller, Dave 9/16/2020 Cedarbrook Assisted Living Proposal From: Daniel Stoller To: Tigard City Council Subject: Cedarbook Assisted Living Proposal Date: September 16, 2020 To whom it may concern, This letter should serve as a formal complaint against Mosaic Management, Tim Taylor of Adamsom Holdings, LLC and Samuel Thomas of Lenity Architecture. Throughout this document these 3 parties, collectively, will be referred to as 'the developers'. The main reason for this complaint, but not limited to, is that while the developers led a neighborhood meeting on August 26, 2020 to discuss their Cedarbrook proposal they acted in bad faith using deception, fear mongering, erroneous data, and confusion tactics in an effort to reduce resistance and participation from impacted neighborhood residents. Below you will find a collection of a examples describing such behaviors: 1. When the developers discussed where the project was within the city/ county mandated approval process, they chose to speak in non-sequential order and provided inadequate details about what had and had not been completed to-date. This is a common strategy used by property developers and management companies to confuse residents in the hopes that the residents will simply give up because they don't have the time, background knowledge of city/ county processes or knowhow to educate themselves on the process and specific project details. In this particular case the developers acted as though the annexation and zoning change were minor details and already near completion. The developers were hiding the fact that if the land does not get annexed into the City of Tigard, the current zoning will not allow them to continue further with their proposal. It is now clear why the developers wanted to suppress any details surrounding the annexation and zoning change. 2. The developers used extremely vague timelines and never mentioned they had submitted a pre-application that all residents have a right to request copies of. Now having read through the pre-application and the notes from the city that accompanied it, it is clear why they didn't want this information made available. The pre-application notes stated exactly what the residents voiced to the developers which is that we all had concerns about Montage Ln turning into a private driveway for the Cedarbrook development. We, the residents, were all told by ODOT and Washington County upon purchasing our units that Montage Ln would eventually continue through to Hall Blvd. Upon further inquiry on September 14, 2020 I was able to confirm this detail with Paul Schaefer, Senior Planner for the Washington County Department of Land Use & Transportation via email. He stated that "SW Montage Lane will be required to be extended through the site. Access to SW Hall Blvd, an ODOT facility, is challenging due to access spacing restrictions for Arterials (SW Hall is also a County Arterial)." When we voiced our concerns, the developers downplayed the original ODOT and Washington County plans for Montage Ln and claimed that their proposal to make it a private driveway for the Cedarbrook development was sufficient in meeting the needs of all involved parties. According to the notes on the pre-application this is simply not true and also very much a concern of ODOT, Washington County and the City of Tigard. 1 3. When the residents asked about alternative plans for the land, the developers used deception to strike fear in the residents to lead us to believe that the only other option was 70 townhomes that would come with inadequate parking. According to Paul Schaefer, the "2.56 acres of TO:R18-24 would require a minimum of 46 units and a maximum of 61 units would be allowed. In the event that some of the site is deemed unbuildable, some/all units can be transferred to the buildable portion of the site in accordance with CDC Section 300-3." I was able to attain this information rather quickly and there is no reason to believe the developers didn't already have this available to them. The developers also did not present any data proving an establishment of townhomes would come with inadequate parking. 4. When the residents voiced concerns over the noise that would be created due to the developers' plans to place the proposed facility's loading dock directly adjacent to at least four townhomes, the developers provided an answer about delivery times without any evidence to back it up. They claimed that deliveries will happen between the hours of 9am and 5pm but were unable to provide any data to back up their answer. The loading dock in question would be located less than 50 feet from at least four townhomes whose master bedrooms are on the same side and the residents are very concerned about early morning and late night deliveries. The current position proposed for the loading dock also almost guarantees delivery trucks would be backing into the dock and therefore making an excessive beeping noise anytime they are completing a delivery. It is because of the above reasons that we as local residents have lost trust in the aforementioned parties and ask that they either be removed from the process or that an expert in Tigard City policy accompanies them, in an effort to force fact-based conversations, as they continue to attempt to move forward with their proposal. Aside from the questionable behavior from the developers, we, the residents, would also like to make clear that upon purchasing our townhomes not only were we told that there were plans for Montage Ln to continue through to Hall Blvd but based on zoning we were under the impression that our neighborhood would be completed with more homes. Having an assisted living facility built on this plot of land, along with the vehicle traffic that would certainly accompany it, is sure to disrupt our neighborhood continuity and potentially create an unsafe situation for impacted families with young children. Finally, we fully expect ODOT, the City of Tigard and Washington County to hold any developer accountable for the required completion of Montage Ln. Not holding the developers accountable for the development of the public road would exhibit unfair bias and reinforce public perception that as long as the developers are well connected within the system, they can do whatever they choose. Regards, Daniel Stoller stollerd@outlook.com 2 AIS-4414 4. A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 09/22/2020 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Proclaim October Domestic Violence Awareness Month Prepared For: Joanne Bengtson, City Management Submitted By: Joanne Bengtson, City Management Item Type: Receive and File Meeting Type: Proclamation Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall Mayor Snider proclaim October 2020 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommend approving this proclamation as requested by the Tigard Police Department. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY October is National Domestic Violence Awareness Month, which first began in 1981 by the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence as a Day of Unity to connect battered women's advocates across the country. Domestic violence affects millions, both women and men, of every race, religion, culture and status. It's not just punches and black eyes -- it's yelling, humiliation, stalking, manipulation, coercion, threats and isolation. It's stealing a paycheck, keeping tabs online, non-stop texting, constant use of the silent treatment, or calling someone stupid so often they believe it. It's physical, verbal and mental abiuse. The landmark Violence Against Women Act passed in 1994, led by then-Senator Joe Biden, combined new provisions that hold offenders accountable and provide programs and services for victims. Between 1993 and 2010, the overall rate of domestic violence dropped nearly two-thirds and state laws have reformed to address issues such as dating abuse in the workplace, stalking, employment discrimination and more. Every October, advocates rededicate themselves to breaking the cycle. OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION This was proclaimed in Tigard last year, and in previous years. Attachments Domestic Violence Awareness Month ° ° ° r "5 s!L II'R•f.' T • " "13 Yi= er N{ 'n:i- Lx i, tw47 : s-t = L .1, oo ° v '°° i i . f ., i + ttx t • :,','44.4:1.:;-.41,0k, y 4 4-n` i{ 4. i - ca ,A„,„ ,zwr 4 : t c r"‘-' ,-14''''.-,'-'w as \� � T� vS�� 1V�rr. � Yet4 `LG .k ,N; ? p �y � om' w t404 a �r n a xz a of Ir� Y � nag � a . r ,:te` � + . 1 n V �. \ 1 \N4,ii, a ,� ' ClpppppppppppppppppppppppppppOpppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp 7 {R }, } Fxt%`t xS+e}'Y'r'3T gQS,^'Rk�'Y✓fph OO�i ✓A!.. ,Limey' At'$$ v [ 1:310''; .'!{'6j9£zJ 4 4 d 11II 1I''.17;t jiti 41. 8 5 2 i5tq 61.kii ',/o)claci ,-..),:„..,,s.:'::::, ....,„,,,,,,,,, € il,,l '` City of Tigard t1ll � gig- DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH -- , 4 ' WHEREAS, domestic violence is a serious crime that affects people of all races, ages, gender ,:inligtil identities, socio-economic levels, religions, backgrounds, beliefs and abilities; and .: _;�: r a !," WHEREAS, domestic violence includes physical, emotional, social, sexual, spiritual, financial and �tl , digital abuse; and can occur between family members, intimate partners and within dating relationships; and ; WHEREAS, more than one in three women and one in four men in the United States report having - { u r � ? experienced domestic violence, stalking, sexual assault or physical assault by an intimate partner a€Zi xii. i' during their lifetimes; and .= t 4? WHEREAS, one in 15 children are exposed to intimate partner violence each year, and 90% of these �,; children are eyewitnesses to this violence - children that grow up in violent homes are believed to be w-,-...4**,t:- abused and neglected at a rate higher than the national average, often resulting in life-long trauma; and ,, Vit; WHEREAS, in 2020 reports suggest a significant increase in domestic violence cases related to the �� COVID-19 pandemic and a reduction in survivors seeking services due to a combination of lockdown f x { ` measures and not wanting to attend health services for fear of infection; and >`� ' F " , :, � 5 w % WHEREAS, it is not uncommon for domestic violence abusers to isolate their victims as an act of -. x t control or to reduce opportunity for disclosure of abuse, and the current societal conditions, including { iiiiy; reduced accessibility to shelters and resources, are likely furthering the impact of these actions; and €▪ It u * „ r. ,,,).1-W41,' WHEREAS, the Domestic Violence Resource Center served 4,010 clients in 2019 and we have yet to ,,,°'§§ '„, `'L,Ok see the full impact of the pandemic and stay-at-home orders on advocacy, counseling, and housing 4%04-, services in 2020; and •0 ,.f c . _: WHEREAS, the Family Justice Center is a collaboration of agencies in one location so survivors can -a .10, access the services they need in one stop, and they have facilitated over 5,200 services to survivors 0 F-.,;41,:-.,.£; annually; and - t WHEREAS, law enforcement officers put their lives at risk daily responding to domestic violencerstl sF-4. incidents and the Tigard Police Department believes a coordinated community effort is imperative to ..tra1-7+.7;,„:. raising awareness of the increased risks to survivors due to COVID-19 and putting a stop to this cycle ` 4� ' m* of violence; and $, I:+e.; WHEREAS, Domestic Violence Awareness Month provides an excellent platform to show support for '' . .- the domestic violence advocates, crisis hotline staff, victim service organizations, the prosecutors who ' I`� a• s: itmx: hold offenders accountable, and law enforcement officers in our community and provides the citizens of .401114,f;; t : Washington County the opportunity to learn more about preventing domestic violence and show support 1 4 T,. for the numerous organizations and individuals who provide critical advocacy, resources, hope and �� - assistance to victims; . , # • T NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Jason B. Snider, Mayor of the City of Tigard, ,' ito b T ." Oregon, do hereby proclaim the month of October 2020 as tr E y� wt'.34�1 S ii, ( ne rry cok `. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH x . `A wy in Tigard, Oregon and urge all residents to show support for the victim service organizations and law r % 6 enforcement officers in our community who provide critical advocacy, resources, hope and 04 4 tj ,;, assistance to victims. I4 . e �' II4-1:::::.0 Dated this dayof September 2020 ` f � FY 4; IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Tigard to ,.„ be affixed. � � • ggg Jason B. Snider, Mayor }. 74e' "4 µ" ' City of Tigard 4. '15i, f 4 Attest: 31 ai p7777 - °°u :lr Carol A. Krager City Recorder • ,., fav f,..... .....pp00000rI ......poo000pppppf0000ap..........ap0000par�aooopp0000oof000oopooaop00000000000000ppoppao v . <� t6 min AA-01:- ,1— , tot .. ,--4,---r...5,--,s ,em f,"°i t, . s:;A••&,,,--- ,pl.,. a. \tb dt ils c fi G. " „(/ ` y,Yy ASffr ig „4 a WS G w' t _: • '' '\', , xg. ,� 4 � �' rc , 1 � F �,$Ih �.. �„ffi� ��„a®��,�,�.,�'� S�; <��,�. ]� �� .� � "a � .. w�nw.'�i l � -a � �!�"'' �;a .ua+' �r s�, �.i "z\ ;< J v q3&i . \ J ?i{.; as u ' nl M .,. €$}1t f`,<S F�J 1,,i#$a''? lidPii�u •` t x �" c.rd t,., �#r z�,✓ w t '�w � � Q `T r t� �$1�rm i �j w� a °� `� °�� z i G£^° .S Ji7 'u,:gp, {x �,.,.,tl { ..,: zef r^ L{ .',3,-L: rd.JiF ''°.1 4 £S T. 4- .L rtf 00:4,.,, err, tea`^ 'l 4—"'e. 000000.00 000 '-; µst2 �.5. , 1_>s s k >-, �, :', t of i- rv: .n , a .w�a.i .e..'r •.t..,;!:.,:;:(9:,../.','',-,f.44l •., L...... ...._...... AIS-4354 5. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 09/22/2020 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Aman Comprehensive Plan Map Zoning Map Amendment: CPA2020-00001/ZON2020-00001 Prepared For: Agnes Lindor, Community Development Submitted By: Agnes Lindor, Community Development Item Type: Ordinance Meeting Type: Council Public Hearing - Quasi Judicial Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing: Yes Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall Council remove the the public hearing on case CPA2020-00001 and ZON2020-00001 for a comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment from the agenda and consider the item once Planning Commission has heard the item and made a recommendation? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends that the City Council remove the item from the agenda and not consider the item until Planning Commission has make their recommendation. The public hearing with Planning Commission was delayed due to resolving issues relating to the Transportation Planning Rule analysis and the cancellation of the September 14th Planning Commission hearing because of the wildfires emergency. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The applicant, Mr. Walter Aman, is requesting approval of a comprehensive plan map amendment and a zoning map amendment. According to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map, the 5.78-acre property, located at 11655 SW Pacific Highway, has a split designation with both General Commercial / C-G (2.55 acres) and Medium Density Residential / R-12 (3.23 acres). The applicant is proposing a change in one of the designations from the current Medium Density Residential / R-12 to Medium-High Density Residential / R-25 as well as a change to the total amount of land in each designation. The proposal would result in the property being designated as General Commercial / C-G (4.12 acres) and Medium-High Density Residential / R-25 (1.66 acres). OTHER ALTERNATIVES City Council may: 1. Choose to delay the public hearing; or 2. Choose to hold the public hearing without a recommendation. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Community Development Code Chapters 18.790; Comprehensive Plan Goals 1, 2, 10; Statewide Planning Goals 1, 2, 10; and Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan Tides 1. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments No file(s) attached. AIS-4280 6. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 09/22/2020 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: Consider a Resolution Accepting the Southwest Corridor Final Conceptual Design Report (CDR) Prepared For: Gary Pagenstecher, Community Development Submitted By: Gary Pagenstecher, Community Development Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall the City Council adopt a resolution accepting the Southwest Corridor Final Draft Conceptual Design Report (Final CDR), as required by the Southwest Corridor Tigard-TriMet Memorandum of Understanding? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends Council adopt the resolution accepting the Final CDR. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The Southwest Corridor (SWC) Light Rail Project will bring high-capacity transit to one of the most congested travel corridors in our region. The new light rail line will create a 30-minute travel time between Downtown Portland and Tualatin, connecting regional centers including West Portland Town Center, Tigard Town Center (Tigard Triangle and Downtown Tigard) and Bridgeport Village. The Draft Conceptual Design Report (CDR) reviewed at Council's April 21st Workshop included information about process, corridor context, general design elements and design concepts for Inner Portland, Outer Portland, as well as the Tigard and Tualatin segments of the alignment. Staff related concerns with the Draft CDR about pedestrian access to stations and the quality of the experience that makes transit desirable and an improvement to the community. Staff concerns focused on the Tigard Town Center station areas at 68th Parkway, Elmhurst Street and Hall Blvd; and three focus areas, including the future 70th Ave, Hwy 217 multi-use path and the five elevated structures. Since that time, staff worked with TriMet to ensure that the issues identified are represented in the Final CDR. This is important because the CDR informs the Basis of Design Report which will inform design development to 60% completion, a milestone expected to be reached in summer 2021. Below are the issue areas Council reviewed in April, Council's direction to TriMet (in italics), and staff's assessment of how they are addressed in the Final CDR. 68th Parkway Station (on Pacific Highway) The station's location adjacent to Pacific Hwy is a significant challenge for cyclists and pedestrians crossing from the north. The elevated structure that will span 68th and the future Red Rock Creek Trail will dominate the pedestrian experience. The Light Rail Transit (LRT) infrastructure and the spaces created for connections from bus to MAX and along fronting streets must be scaled for a safe, comfortable and desirable pedestrian experience. The CDR needs to show the essential features of a pedestrian friendly station area such as a protected bike lane and mid-block crossing between 64th and 68th, designed to promote walkability and accessibility for all. Final CDR: no change from Draft CDR, which notes "Potential project implementation of enhanced pedestrian mid-block crossing (Approvals required by ODOT and City of Tigard)" and shows striped bike lanes on 99W and 68th (Figure 7.4.4); Design Values: Applying Community Feedback In Ongoing Design (page 158) captures the Council's direction for design development. This council concern remains unresolved. 70th Ave Public Realm For four blocks in the heart of the urbanizing Triangle, the LRT trackway will be within the 70th Avenue right of way. To ensure the trackway is designed to add value to the public realm and does not become a barrier, the CDR needs to more fully address the quality of the pedestrian experience along 70th. This will be a primary station access route within the neighborhood. Final CDR: no change from Draft CDR, which notes extension of 70th to Atlanta and the at-grade crossing of Dartmouth are to be determined (Figure 7.5.4); Design Values: Applying Community Feedback In Ongoing Design (page 162) captures the Council's direction for design development. This council concern remains unresolved. Elmhurst Station The station area is central to the Triangle. A network of local streets and connections (west over Hwy 217 to downtown and south along 70th to the Tigard/Lake Oswego regional trail) are planned. The station area design should optimize this connectivity and provide first/last mile mobility options for access to Triangle jobs, education and residents. The CDR needs to show a four-way intersection at Elmhurst/70th and integration of the multi-use path from downtown over 72nd through the station area to 70th. Final CDR: includes changes reflecting TOD Charter work such as LRT alignment with Elmhurst, intersection improvements at 70th and 72nd, and an integrated MUP to the north of the elevated guideway to 72nd (Figures 7.6.4 and 7.6.6). In addition, Design Values: Applying Community Feedback In Ongoing Design (page 164) captures the Council's direction for design development. This council concern remains unresolved. Hwy 217 Bridge with Integrated MUP Integration of a multi-use path (MUP) with the LRT structure over Hwy 217 is critical to provide connectivity between the Downtown and Triangle districts of the Tigard Town Center. TriMet has indicated that funding for this betterment must be secured by December for inclusion in the 60% design drawings. A concept-level design will be required to support the funding request. The CDR needs to show a concept level design of an integrated MUP to support its commitment to design and jointly seek funding under the Tigard/TriMet MO U. Final CDR: minor change as described for Elmhurst, above; the project description (page 168) states "Both TriMet and the City of Tigard agree the multi-use pathway is a project betterment and will partner to be co-applicants for funding." (Figures 7.6.6 and 7.8.8 show extent and location of Multi-use Pathway). Meanwhile, Tigard and TriMet are cooperating on funding opportunities, including the BUILD grant for which a concept-level design of an integrated MUP was prepared by TriMet. This council concern remains unresolved. Downtown Station Optimization for TOD The Hall Blvd station area is complicated by the adjacency of the proposed Operations and Maintenance facility, the redesign of Hall Blvd and the desire for suitable transit-oriented development (TOD) sites. The City and TriMet are cooperating on a City-led TOD Charter program to maximize TOD potential. To acknowledge this effort, the CDR needs to broadly represent the Hall Blvd station area as a TOD area work in progress. Final CDR: no change (Figures 7.8.2 and 7.8.6); however, Design Values: Applying Community Feedback In Ongoing Design (page 170) captures the Council's direction for design development. This council concern remains unresolved. Elevated Structures There are five significant elevated trackway structures proposed within Tigard: over 68th Parkway; Red Rock Creek; Dartmouth; Hwy 217; and Bonita. These structures will be the most visually impactful elements of the LRT alignment for most people moving through and around Tigard, experienced at both the landscape and pedestrian scale. Although the CDR does include three elevations and notes that design mitigations for visual impacts will be considered, the detail of how this will be accomplished needs better representation in the CDR. The CDR needs to better represent elevated structures in Tigard and identify specific contextual elements to be considered in their design development. Final CDR: no change involving the identification of specific contextual elements; however, an expanded Chapter 4 (pages 64/65) includes a general Overhead Structures Design Toolkit (Figure 4.24) for use in the context sensitive design of structures. This Council concern remains unresolved. Staff recommends Council adopt the proposed Resolution Accepting the Final CDR with Direction to Resolve Outstanding Design Issues Identified by the Tigard City Council on April 21st, 2020. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The Council could choose not to approve the resolution accepting the Final CDR or adopt a revised resolution accepting the Final CDR with conditions. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS December 2017 Tigard/TriMet MOU Tigard Strategic Plan DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION •4/21/20: Received Draft CDR presentation from TriMet and Staff • 1/21/20: Receive Update on Memorandum of Understanding for SW Corridor Project • 10/15/19: Consider Resolution on Tigard Southwest Corridor Affordable Housing Predevelopmeht Project Workplan • 10/08/19: Discussion on Possible Southwest Corridor Alignment Changes • 11/13/18: Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Construction of the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project in Tigard City Limits • 10/30/18: Compliance of the proposed SWC MAX Light Rail Project with state-mandated land use criteria as applicable in the City of Tigard •03/20/18: Comprehensive Update on SWC Light Rail Planning •02/14/17: Discuss SW Corridor Land Use Final Order •06/28/16: Consideration of a Resolution Approving Ballot Title language for a November SW Corridor Ballot Measure •09/01/15: SW Corridor/Downtown Zoom-In •07/21/15: Presentation on SW Corridor Planning Progress •02/10/15: Metro IGA for Planning and Public Involvement Work - SW Corridor Plan •02/18/14: SW Corridor Plan Public Input Update • 10/08/13: Resolution Endorsing the SW Corridor Plan and Shared Investment Strategy •06/25/13: Recommendation of the SW Corridor Plan Steering Committee •05/21/13: SW Corridor Plan Update •02/19/13: SW Corridor Plan Update • 11/20/12: SW Corridor Plan Update • 12/13/11: Briefing on SW Corridor Plan Public Involvement and Messaging •07/19/11: Update on the Tigard High Capacity Transit Land Use Plan Attachments Resolution CDR Final Report CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20- A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR FINAL DRAFT CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT SUMMER 2020 (FINAL CDR)WITH DIRECTION TO RESOLVE OUTSTANDING DESIGN ISSUES IDENTIFIED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ON APRIL 21ST,2020. WHEREAS, in November 2018, the City of Tigard and TriMet signed a Memorandum Of Understanding ("MOU") Regarding Construction Of The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project In Tigard City Limits;and WHEREAS, the MOU demonstrates a commitment of the parties to collaborate on important Tigard-based project decisions to ensure that the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Transit Project ("SWC Project" or"Project") addresses regional transportation needs while furthering City of Tigard land use and transportation objectives; and WHEREAS,the executed MOU states that ". . . a draft and final Conceptual Design Report [is] to be presented to the City Council for acceptance: . . ." WHEREAS, on April 21, 2020, City Council reviewed the Draft CDR and provided direction to TriMet related to concerns about pedestrian access to stations and the quality of the experience that makes transit desirable and an improvement to the community. These concerns focused on the Tigard Town Center station areas at 68th Parkway,Elmhurst Street and Hall Blvd;and three focus areas,including the future 70th Ave,Hwy 217 multi-use path and the five elevated structures;and WHEREAS, as stated in the Final CDR: "This Conceptual Design Report presents the goals and preliminary designs of the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project based on community and project partner input over the past several years. It describes and illustrates the overall urban design vision as well as the conceptual designs for stations, major structures and other key corridor improvements. The document is intended to further public discussion about the project design,identify remaining challenges and shape ongoing design efforts in the coming years;"and WHEREAS, the Final CDR informs the Basis of Design Report which informs Project design development to 60 percent of Project completion; and WHEREAS,on September 22,2020, City Council reviewed the Final CDR and found that Council's concerns remain unresolved in the Final CDR. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council accepts the Final CDR with direction to resolve outstanding design issues,identified by the Tigard City Council on April 21st,2020. SECTION 2: Council requests that TriMet project staff return to City Council prior to completion of 60 percent engineering to present how Council's issues have been resolved. RESOLUTION NO. 20- Page 1 SECTION 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2020. Mayor- City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder- City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 20- Page 2 _ -_ ...",......_— - --J_T._ ----- __--.--:_-•-_-::.-- _ -1--=-_-_--,_4---- -- -----'---- - --'-'' ---,'-- --L ••,:r:.- - - ---------.. ----- ----- -- ------ -.- ---. _ - -••,------e-.:---1- -,,-_-_-------_ --, _ _5-..=----_-- - - --. . ---- -41F -•,- _ - ._._ _ - - -- _ _ _.— -;0....„,....,„ .; . _ .. %II 11: ' 1.1.11111:1111.1:11:11. - lit - -- _ • . - ----,==1 IF!olipliiihe- sligilillfflilip v .. _ _ --_ .11.. 411=7--.1121 MU I slung I a .- . •::-- _,---- ----------- ---,I= , , i . - -- L a - . AlkiiII 4 morm-*esm=a . I somplis MA a • . °-_-5-7-:- . 411111 imIgidill -IIFElondi . . -......., ., Imal Ism ma..F. - .... - 111111 0 ,,a ilium 1 lFRE ---- ---- a IlL 1199111M11111111 . , _ - _va.4 -HEE 1,---5•1181 • ..1 1 ._'t'.-• k ,r . - __ , •JAIliimp- _- . F.Aril - : ol, - -_ - ,___ -_:- kik_ ---"-- - 4''''''' _-_--_ T41 • dr 1 '-z-• -4 010,77--_,,.z,. t 2RI_ - -I;f •=1 -k - • '''' Ilikk.- . W _ _______ — -- -'----- '' 101011111"--, --__-- _-_-- ....,...„- r i P - -- -._77' /- - _ `IIMIN1h. ... k.. -"NI 11 _OA ;111.T'•--7-.-Z.--- -- "IlL d r --- •T-- /f•'-- s - i -II, ' •". , 7igior- ger '44411"- _.--- . _ n. , -_ '''':' !rj, ' "-a. _ s _,_ _.... ._ __, _ lloi [ .... i 0 ...,__ __., imuall,_ i v ,,,. •avt__ _ :: ,,,,. _000.-.....0,00.-_-_, . ,•••••••-. 11•••••-_-..A••••••--,..• . i /741P.- IPS _it _ _ _ —41 "...-. .111L_, .=,.,.. 01,. AIMpe La . We -'-'- -----71— -_ -_7.•_-•••=----.-__...-...,- -- ,.. - ----N, - --. -;....'----,...----7- -F.;••••-•----=-----"---- 2-:- f - —"--,-- - ..... ftt- ,..... '''.- . - -..-.-"'-i- -------7- , 11P-:a • ------ -,-517-------7-----_. - -- - - ---..-- __ ___ .;---:,-• _ . --'''' 41—• ---: ---;_:4---,=g'-' - ---- - -- -----;r;---••=4- ----.-- - -.-r. -'--.='''''f------ --- -- ----- - - — - — _ ---- OIL•----"- -- ---..-7, ----- ...=-,..a._, -\I •-• SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT GREAT PLACES °Corri CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT cwcodor rridorplan org FINAL DRAFT I SUMMER 2020 PROJECT PARTNERS * Ap. .,,, °••\* "IA TRIaMETow% g1,2 Metro Oregon )(Department ,- ,.____r. • Illq : of Transportation tft4r1-11.1A TIGARD •Z.....4 - NEGi:A. Jes. ri - ..i. ce . _ r''''''''' _ !eOPU E CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT r � _ _is Conal Design Report presents the �� ; • goals and preliminary designs of the SouthwestW--- 5 1 n Corridor Light Rail Project based on community - If '' =--- e J and project partner input over the past several _- - _ : I - years. It describes and illustrates the overall urban - ` ,- '� • design vision as well as the conceptual designs for _? },;a., stations, major structures and other key corridor - 1 improvements. The document is intended to further '1 lf. As ! ._ public discussion about the project design, identify `E - - ; , _ - w E remaining challenges and shape ongoing design • - i i; �(,j .14th '`: :�F' .4-� -----7::......: efforts in the coming years. .. N 4,:' 'f .w'` "= = -.......... ..-..7.---, �� . --- -.:An environmental review of the project is alsoW.. iw' ' =� • underway. A Draft Environmental Impact Statement a , . '' :r, r:•r .- :..: •,.2,.F.• ' l a's' (DEIS) was published in June 2018, initiating a iv • t_01,170.,- -%,,.., �. �; --~ public comment period. Together,the DEIS analysis • � '' ".-.-'!“-A.-. ,, ..11 , 1 " and public comments informed the selection of a 1-==,:" -, 7.` .. - Locally Preferred Alternative in November 2018. :.:,. . ' --1- "'ii y=� _ - ,-- A Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) ,, � : 4- Lo .,,� - expected to be published in the fall of 2020 -will �- ; respond to feedback and define the project scope, . ;, --_, _ _i tr.-- impacts and mitigations. s �� 1' ' g . -.-"•-•-,_. -110 it For more technical information about the project - ..*40,47.-:"""••••----.--. � '16-� : "ii _ ~— �4 such as property impacts,traffic and noise - please .• • _, - refer to the Final Environmental Impact Statement or +► iR� - lee - 1R ' contact project staff at: swcorridor@trimet.org E- - - - ,- i ' k` -..'� . ' <[ -'rW 11 ` � ' `7 PHOTO CREDITS s> i.: I. r t I� ,,,.„_ , , nos a' : All photos taken by TriMet unless otherwise noted. ta, 'I� E. 14:iv _ linj¢(., I 05 . 1116 TM vt,,• 4 - - '.4 *•,:.- 1' '-'?moi. , - th. 11111 ._ � ,. TriMet Administrative Offices . - ii: t 1800 SW 1st Avenue, Suite 300 'AN` -- �. :-•a ;- ' - /_ - =' Portland, OR 97201 0 - ;' . 10 ,/ °,, 503-962-7505 '- � -_ trimet.org/swcorridor ,+; r �:. ��,� C ilk >. �_ r -. )0 _ 3 Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 4 Design Elements 46 4.1 Design Guidance 47 4.2 Stations and Platforms 49 flIntroduction 9 4.3 Alignment Design 52 1.1 Project Purpose and Values 11 4.4 Trackway Type 58 1.2 Regional Planning Blueprint 14 4.5 Operations Equipment and Facilities 60 1.3 Project Overview 15 4.6 Walls 62 4.7 Overhead Structures 64 4.8 Bike Facilities and Protected Intersections 66 ElProcess 23 4.9 Light Rail Intersections 69 2.1 Understanding Project Impacts 24 4.10 Stormwater Features 72 2.2 Key Milestones 25 4.11 Urban Design Elements 74 2.3 Project Partners 26 4.12 Station Access Toolkit 76 2.4 Guiding Documents 26 4.13 Creating Places at Stations 81 2.5 Funding 26 2.6 Committees 27 izi Design Concepts: Inner Portland 83 2.7 Community Engagement 27 2.8 Creating a Shared Investment 28 2.9 Equitable Development Strategy 28 6 Design Concepts: Outer Portland 109 2.10 Key Next Steps 29 EllDesign Concepts:Tigard and Tualatin 146 © Corridor Context 31 3.1 The Corridor in History 32 3.2 Connecting Neighborhoods 33 Acknowledgments 190 3.3 Land Use and Planning Context 34 3.4 Equitable Transit-Oriented Development 35 3.5 Natural Features 36 Appendices 192 3.6 Trails and Parks 37 3.7 Connecting Riders to Their Destinations 38 3.8 Station Access Coordination 45 4 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT � ma- 7�, Executive Summary _ ' context and history,which informs opportunities and challenges for the overall project design. In Chapter 4,the CDR provides examples and toolkits for project elements. We've published this document in the midst of the . r Chapters 5-7 describe station locations,access planning, COVID 19 pandemic,a unique global experience that 1 -t � a and functional concept plans. Building on community has changed a lot of things transit included. But one input generated,these chapters also note the design value statements to be explored further in future project phases. thing that remains the same is the region's commitment Iola 4 to safely and affordably get people where they need to 47 f In addition to the project scope,the CDR captures the go.While we adapt our system to meet our community's } �l connection with relevant infrastructure projects planned current needs,it is important that we also look toward the ..riai. ' -------- by partner agencies. During previous outreach,a variety horizon,and continue planning for how we want our region of complementary infrastructure projects for the corridor to grow for generations to come. and combat climate change,which disproportionately affect people of color and low income communities. We were seen as important investments by the community. remain committed to building and maintaining a safe, While these projects are planned,designed,funded and The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project represents constructed entirely by partner agencies,and are not part the next important step in building out our region's affordable and accessible transit system for everyone. of the project,they are included on pages in each station transportation system.The new MAX Line will provide a area for context.These projects demonstrate that the Finally,the project contributes to the local economy: 30 minute trip between Downtown Portland and Tualatin, Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project is the backbone one of the most congested travel corridors in our region. forty Disadvantaged Business Enterprises are already As the region grows to by more than 400,000 people by employed through preliminary design work,and the of a high-capacity transit network, leveraging further 2040,the project will also be the catalyst for broader opportunity to bring nearly$1.33 billion in federal matching investments and improving regional mobility. corridor improvements,fostering connected,affordable funds is expected to generate over 28,000 jobs in our REALIZING OUR REGION'S SHARED VALUES communities where all people can live,work,and thrive. region.This includes direct jobs such as planners, designers,engineers and construction workers-as well as 4 The project benefits are myriad and extend to the region at stimulating job growth through indirect and induced jobs MOVE AND large. Compared to its current state,the project allows the as salaries are spent in our local economy on groceries, CONNECT PEOPLE corridor to move more people to more places, increasing entertainment,and the wide range of services offered person-throughput capacity in segments such as historic throughout the corridor. SW Barbur Blvd by as much as 57 percent in the AM �. �I peak and 46 percent in PM peak. By reducing the daily The current project design reflects nearly a decade of passenger vehicle miles traveled by about 59,000 miles per planning between TriMet, Metro,Oregon Department of OO MAINTAIN AND CREATE day,the equivalent of about 7,000 to 8,000 metric tons of Transportation,Washington County,and the Cities of EQUITABLE annual greenhouse gas emissions,the project helps fulfill Portland,Tualatin,and Durham.The Conceptual Design `11.-, COMMUNITIES state and local climate action plans. Report(CDR)describes and illustrates the overall design ; , vision by providing conceptual designs for stations, Regional growth projections anticipate 75,000 new structures,and other key corridor improvements.The residents and 65,000 new jobs in the corridor by 2035. In document is intended to further public discussion about partnership with the Southwest Equitable Development the project design as well as identify remaining challenges. 0 AND RESTORE Strategy,the project will also help retain and increase Technical information about the project,such as traffic, NATURAL ENVIRONMENT opportunities for people of color and low-income residents wetland impacts,and mitigation strategies are detailed in living in the corridor. Project partners aim to create 950 the Final Environmental Impact Statement(FEIS),which new affordable housing units in the corridor(Appendix C). complements the CDR. i I I. The CDR outlines project principles,goals and a■■1 DESIGN FOR THE Transit provides a critical social equity role.Southwest FUTURE Corridor Light Rail Project partners are developing objectives developed with input from a variety of project '.., strategies to minimize gentrification and displacement, stakeholders. In Chapter 3,the CDR introduces regional 5 DOWNTOWN PORTLAND _ I. PROJECT SCOPE Portland Transit Mall: The project coordinates with 26 Connection to MAX lines, 405 /4 planned improvements for the Project scope includes improvements for people Portland Streetcar and buses • SW Naito Parkway Main Street- walking,biking,taking the bus,and driving,such as: Beaverton II. Ross Island Bridgehead Project TC WES Marquam Hill Connector: Gibb'T 26 • 10 miles of new,standard bi-directional sidewalks • An inclined elevator from Gibbs Marquam Hill Connector oo• • • • .0 Aerial Hill uam and crosswalks to improve comfort and promote Street Station to Mar q Newbury&Vermont Viaducts: 1 Tram walkable access to transit and local station area will connect the 18,000 patients, Two 100-year-old viaducts on SW • Hamilton amenities. employees,students and Barbur Blvd will be replaced with residents that visit the campus seismically sound structures, • Over six miles of enhanced bicycles facilities, every day making them safer for all users including shared streets,raised protected bike • SW Multnomah Blvd lanes and protected intersections encourage bicycle commutingand access to transit. BEAVERT IN traveling Transitway:ooBuses Y traveling to/from destinations An improved SW Barbur Blvd • to the west will be able to skip • Short-term and long-term bike parking options are streetscape with landscape,sidewalks 13th traffic from SW Capitol Highway conveniently located at each station. and raised protected bike lanes • 19th to the Portland Transit Mall by • Up to 2,000 Park&Ride spaces along the • Hall/Nimbus WES • sharing a dedicated transit-only alignment. SW Taylors Ferry Rd 0 30th lane with light rail Tigard Transit Center: • • 1.6 miles of shared transitway allowing buses to Downtown Tigard will have more Barbur Transit Center choices withortation travel within the light rail guideway,enhancing transportation improved bus connections and 053rd the speed, reliability and convenience of bus the new MAX station,a short O SW PORTLAND 1 routes serving Hillsdale and other Southwest walk from the WES station 68th communities. o �-, • A new operations and maintenance facility(OMF) Tigard Transit • • SE PORTLAND supports fast, reliable and cost effective MAX Center/WES Q Elmhurst �`, pp Hall SW 53rd Ave Improvements �� service in the corridor and brings up to 150 new for people biking and walking, 2- jobs jobs to Tigard. with a potential shuttle to TIGARD PCC-Sylvania,the college's • SW 70th Ave improvements will complete portions 99W m • 5 largest campus of Tigard's planned bike and pedestrian network Bonita and increase access to the growing Tigard Triangle Oswego Lake mixed use community. • Upper Boones Ferry • SW Hall Blvd,SW Commercial St and SW Hunziker St improvements will improve safety for people Tualatin River O Bridgeport Transit Center: walking and biking,and promote comfortable Bridgeport Transit Center A structured Park&Ride will access to transit throughout Downtown Tigard. increase capacity for regional Southwest Corridor Light Rail commuters and bus connections • A new pedestrian bridge over SW Lower Boones to create seamless regional - Streetscape Improvements Ferry Rd connects the light rail station with bus connections O•• • Connection Improvements facilities and a Park&Ride at Bridgeport Transit TUALATIN 0 Tualatin WES Center in Tualatin,supporting many different ways © Park&Ride of reaching the MAX system. Other Rail Transit Major Freeway 6 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT DESIGN CONCEPTS: PORTLAND GIBBS STREET STATION See Page 94 MARQUAM HILL CONNECTOR See Page 98 ? ► • Nestled between the historic Lair Hill neighborhood Marquam Hill,home to numerous health care 44.10- and the forested West Hills of Terwilliger Parkway, destinations,including Oregon Health&Science d- , : the Gibbs Street Station will provide a critical k University(OHSU),attracts over 18,000 employees, '_\.,g; connection for the thousands of employees, patients and students each day from around -- _cri '. -• 1..-t; _ patients and students visiting Marquam Hill every - the region.To serve this major destination,the `7 �- day.Enhanced pedestrian crossings will make • - Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project will include •. it easier for South Portland residents to access •i, a connection from the Gibbs Street Station on SW .-z...:.:,. . � . Terwilliger Parkway's natural beauty and expansive : 4 Barbur Blvd,up the steep inclines toward Marquam " �' �= views.With a new crossing of SW Naito Pkwy Hill to land at SW Terwilliger Blvd.An inclined b `. and the Marquam Hill Connector,a pedestrian elevator will provide a new form of transportation 6,200 Projected 098 Percent Walk connection will reach from the South Waterfront in Portland.Two elevator cabs would run on Dail Trips* 82 Percent Transfer to Marquam Hill.These connections will provide 10,000 Projected parallel tracks to move people up and down the Daily p 00 Percent Auto direct access to the light rail station,and a new Daily Trips steep slope between OHSU and Gibbs Street *An additional 7,600 projected daily trips are public plaza. Station. expected from buses in the shared transitway HAMILTON STREET STATION See Page 102 13TH AVENUE STATION See Page 118 i j.'i The Hamilton Street Station is located near the - ' _ - _ . - 13th Avenue Station is located on the east side 1' South Portland community hub,between SW - _ of the West Hills and is the gateway to the SW {� r f Bancroft St and SW Hamilton St.Safer,easier — Barbur Blvd commercial corridor.Adjacent to they � pedestrian connections across SW Barbur Blvd will Burlingame Fred Meyer and between the South i - help link the Homestead neighborhood uphill and t 1111110. Burlingame and Hillsdale neighborhoods,it is the �I44 . the South Portland neighborhood downhill.The — closest station to Hillsdale Town Center and the �•�1.. ..111-1i11/- ,,.�,, �,,� �' station will serve as a major transfer point for local -� ;��_�� . SW Terwilliger Blvd crossing of 15,serving as a key *_ . bus lines. �. _' ..3� --_ . connection point for people walking,biking,driving _ and taking buses traveling toward Downtown _ _-, Y Portland or Tigard/Tualatin. Ai 1,800 Projected 043 Percent Walk 2,300 Projected 063 Percent Walk Daily Trips 846 Percent Transfer Dail Trips 837 Percent Transfer Daily 012 Percent Auto pS 0 Percent Auto 19TH AVENUE STATION See Page 122 30TH AVENUE STATION See Page 126 19th Avenue Station is nested within a -` 30th Avenue Station is located on SW Barbur neighborhood and commercial area located at the �40r ..-. --'. _ Blvd providing direct access to the Markham and intersection of SW Capitol Hill Rd,SW 19th Ave and `,; +"s` �,�� r r Multnomah neighborhoods.Nearby SW 26th Ave SW Barbur Blvd.The SW 19th Ave and SW Spring — - •` provides convenient access from residential areas • �' "� .. ,- 't Garden St overcrossings of I-5 provide convenient - • .'` east of I-5.Located near existing commercial and �aG- 4 p ' `' "'. i , multimodal access from the station to the South �` _ ---� '� - - office areas,30th Avenue Station also provides Burlingame neighborhood east of 15.The station `— access to neighborhood amenities and supports �— -- is adjacent to a recentlyremodeled Safewaystore _ 1 + g�� and sone of two stations within close proximity ~ � = future growth. to the Multnomah neighborhood.A number of �� .= schools,housing and parks are clustered near this �' 2,000 Projected 087 Percent Walk station. 4,200 Projected 095 Percent Walk Daily Trips 812 Percent Transfer DailyTrips80 Percent Transfer 01 Percent Auto 0 5 Percent Auto 7 BARBUR TRANSIT CENTER See Page 130 53RD AVENUE STATION See Page 138 - -' With views to Mt. Hood and centered within the "Ir--- 53rd Avenue Station is located in the far Southwest - - West Portland Town Center,the Barbur Transit neighborhood off SW 53rd Ave between SW Barbur Center is the high-visibility flagship station of the *- }:x, .-. Blvd and 1-5.Adjacent to the wooded slopes of Mt. new Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project within T �trr*''r 1'�� - •, �. -�'- ` g j � ,._T.•„_-__:____-,.„._- Sylvania,the station serves the neighborhood and -� - the City of Portland.With access to I-5,SW Capitol ,�i� `��- ••.-:- - ' the PCC-Sylvania campus.Complementing walk • -' .7,...„1"... �' Hwy,SW Taylors Ferry Rd,multiple bus routes,an r s - 1 -----410 i° and bus access to the station,the site includes • ■ r -- existing pedestrian bridge across I-5 and nearby " : a proposed surface Park&Ride with up to 310 -7-- connections connections to SW Trails,Barbur Transit Center ` " ,-0.-..:r ' _ •�, .7-_. ;. -. spaces,and improvements on SW 53rd Ave for - _ - is at the crossroads of multimodal mobility.The �`4`•; people walking and biking. '-' `' '`', transit center consists of bus amenities,a light •;!�\• • - -q-,_ t rail connection a surface Park&Ride with up to • ► ` 2,900 Projected 065 Percent Walk 300 spaces,improved pedestrian access and bike 2,400 Projected 065 Percent Walk O 12 Percent Transfer parking facilities. e 1 Percent Transfer Daily Trips r+24 Percent Auto Daily Trips D34 Percent Auto DESIGN CONCEPTS: TIGARD & TUALATIN 68TH PARKWAY STATION See Page 158 ELMHURST STREET STATION See Page 164 __ r,-- - �=— Located on the south side of Pacific Hwy/99W, •�-% _ . . , Located at the heart of the Tigard Triangle,the - the stations' prominent presence atop a natural "-v., station is a central magnet supporting mobility in IMP amphitheater above Red Rock Creek provides s _ : all directions for the growing number of residents views over the Tualatin Valley and Red Rock Creek I . and workers in this mixed use neighborhood. watershed.68th Parkway Station acts as the portal ate ' Street improvements near the station will promote � _ - 1 into the burgeoning Tigard Triangle neighborhood. safe and convenient access to mixed use - - " • . Sidewalk improvements and improved pedestrian s '•`` '- neighborhoods and regional trails. •,_ =+�. -_ - crossings on Pacific Hwy/99W at SW 68th Pkwy _ ` and SW 64th Ave connect the station to the _ i- ' residential areas to the north.Adjacent bus stops - " ' and a surface Park&Ride with up to 350 spaces - 4,900 Projected 041 Percent Walk will enable quick and easy transfers for people 3,900 Projected 4299 Percent Walk 040 Percent Transfer coming from King City,Sherwood and otherO 1 Percent Transfer Daily Trips C'`19 Percent Auto Dally Trips ^0 Percent Auto communities southwest of Tigard. HALL BOULEVARD STATION See Page 170 BONITA ROAD STATION See Page 176 Sitting at the intersection of a dense mixed- Located at the intersection of SW Bonita Rd and use center and regional employment hub,Hall . SW 74th Ave,Bonita Road Station serves both • .. . Boulevard Station is a critical node for the _ r _ the diverse residential communities to the west i - project.To emphasize bus and WES Commuter 'T - . e I and the industrial employment center to the east. Rail transfers,the SW Commercial St transit ' .. Perhaps more importantly,the station is just a •-x x..�-ru:�s eeI._; , corridor will be designed for pedestrian comfort few steps from an entry point to the Fanno Creek . . ! and integrate the station into Downtown Tigard. _? , Trail,making it a perfect link for those walking and k..... Design elements include bus shelters,landscaping, ' ' biking along this vital regional connector. r pavement treatments and wayfinding.Similar pedestrian and bicycle improvements along SW __ - - Hall Blvd and SW Hunziker St will help continue to • 5,500 Projected 046 Percent Walk make Tigard one of the most walkable cities in the 2,300 Projected 073 Percent Walk Daily Trips 842 Percent Transfer region. Dail TriS 027 Percent Transfer 012 Percent Auto y p 00 Percent Auto 8 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD STATION See Page 180 BRIDGEPORT TRANSIT CENTER See Page 184 Upper Boones Ferry Road Station is located in the The Bridgeport Transit Center will be more than heart of Tigard's bustling office park employment just a light rail station. It will be an iconic mobility '1` '--1---7-. center.Commuters will be able to easily walk to node and visible gateway to those traveling across . dozens of offices,industrial buildings and business _ the region.With a major Park&Ride,bus transfer parks that surround the station.SW Upper Boones ''` iii«);,b F -.- - center,access to 1-5 and walkable connections to ' Ferry Rd also serves as the primary connection "" T� �. r-•, r _ 9 Bridgeport Village,the station will serve a wide from the station to residential and retail areas to - - _ - ' range of communities in the southern metro area. Q� ,` _--, the east of I-5 and beyond. -`__ - -. Adjacent to the Bridgeport Village commercial - . ,_ r. center are numerous potential development sites. �' ��. 're" 1' The area is set to become a new central hub of A - activity. 1,300 Projected 0100 Percent Walk 7,800 Projected 023 Percent Walk Daily Trips 00 Percent Transfer DailyTrips e 50 Percent Transfer p 0 0 Percent Auto27 Percent Auto WHAT'S NEXT? Following this CDR,the project will seek to secure 30 2011-2018 2019-2020 2020-2022 2022-2027 percent of local funding commitments through the Get Moving 2020 regional transportation funding measure O� 0 '�J • jLi in November 2020.These commitments are necessary PLANNING DESIGN ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION to continue to advance toward a Full Funding Grant Agreement from the Federal Transportation Administration COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT See Chapter 2 to learn more about the community (ONGOING) engagement process and next phases of the project. (FTA).The project anticipates starting construction in 2021,with the start of service in 2027. WORKING TOGETHER FOR TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES Beyond 2027,developing light rail infrastructure opens up __ many _ -_ = - many future opportunities to improve and expand value in --- - _--_ __ = __- _ _ - _ the communities surrounding its stations.As illustrated - . - .= '_-` - i i ;, i e on the right,the future vision for a transit station brings • ! - 'or is , , .'sh l ibliliillli. opportunities for expanded mobility services supporting _-_ F • - III 11 . �At=--iiIitr' IHiIII!11I r wmu R, - o station access,transit-oriented development that help ' # - _ �__s , � . r.l�, , :- - I1 I�IiIiiiI °iilii � - communities take advantage of the public investment of Q _ 4 � • a system and improvements to natural systems including � ,- y i' I • ---'''.7"7-'---:'-'4 ,:- . trails,streams and wetlands. Y= � +: .•-. - "`' "' l �tIN... Ultimately,the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project _:� _ _� oco ' is key to shaping the future of our region in line with - �•� _ _ fi_t-�:i-it 1 • � '� , Metro's 2040 Growth Concept.Working together,we _ .=_ - • - .1:�■,� /7% ._ _ --- _ _: •L • can achieve a project that moves and connects people, __ = - - _ _ - -=_=fes_ -.Th.. . • _. --took•••__I ` provides transportation choices, maintains and creates - - — - _ - _ __-__=Y= _= �:�.6 �.. . . equitable communities,preserves and restores the natural ,:' - = _ -� � � �` - environment,and builds infrastructure for a sustainable Mature tree canopy and stormwater features, Private mobility options can complement and The presence of a walkable,compact and future.The project partners look forward to ongoing over time,can create a more attractive street- promote transit use.The project is assessing mixed community near stations helps to collaboration with the many stakeholders in the region to level pedestrian experience while protecting the need for future mobility services at encourage transit use,and offers better realize the vision of this project. rivers,streams and oceans. locations within and outside the right-of-way. mobility for non-driving populations. 1 INTRODUCTION -•-.- -- -.. - . ,r• :-.--'- - - _. --3rL -"" -IrFr:-7 • . - T ___... r.- 4 -9.-- _-,-------- . - : -4-W_T.-4--• _- - - -•• -•- - _• . 1 ; •di- , .-- ' '' . --1-'4,- • .ten-- -•• _ _ •.__ •, • *-2,-4- . .... ..-..- •-7-r .... . 1 1 n- . -7- •f. •-',.-..- 7:'----- 7....‘•.---- •-_.2.-.- .1%.--f-mailWr• ..t . 1. VISION FOR SOUTHWEST • ..1',-4...,,-.4:'--7 -__ _ -.:.31 ----, 1: _ • . z..._ - - - - :-- .-7...; t •'11 , .._. / -1-. • .,./.0,. ,- --..-2-1-____Jr. ..,_„__ 0 • CORRIDOR -10:7-. . •'. ----v --gr-=:-.... - ,-.,,,-...;:,-- ,-,-- — .. , .. __,-- ril----:.--_-•_ r '-.. -'..1t1.,- • ._• ._ . 11‘11. EXAMPLE: HAMILTON STATION ----__ _,- ,.,41,1,::-,_•,-1....r!-.:_i-,_.0-___,_.,..,...-_ . . _17-,1.--',1 • , .- -----3rtL... - .. , f L' i ill . ..,;_.. . _ •r • .::-.34-ir. -1141.-- ,r-- .,:.....ei_ - .4-:=-- ..-: -17.-..-N• -(,.7.-.'-'• =--. - ..----• •'E' I f A :;.-• r'--d..Y "--- -.' ,_'.,,_, L., .. ..,,, . , • - 1,..-r—: - ... . , • . - __._._ _ :--•:Ms —. _.. v r I . . -.• •••-•'- - ..,--.F.- • ':.— : ' -4."..: • • V • • • A mix of existing and future uses . . .--. _-_..--7.;,.---, - - • • . -...,. -7-.• Ca are easily and safely walkable and .• , , . _ . •• • _._ __ -•_-- • •- --.:- .. iv.-,a- • • ...- -- .. „Ali-,-.-.w.-•„... - - - - • • r - -'tirstc. 3.- , :ite62• ik. - bikable from the station _ • _____,. .--,-z:--_ . A..ff p/1. • I • 4- .-- x-L--1- - ' "5:,...-- - • --- ,- . -.• .. _ '_ - -- -...P. --._ T . I .- . _ _-. . :r,___ . --.;:rr -..-•-' '',-Ait.---. 7.- ---7:-:,--1.;7. ..., .---:T:-...:. -•'.7.............-. 7.--'-.- -.- ' -. 1 1 : . .. ._ -: • . -•=7.,. ,. ..- --` • ,- ; elr fi). • 4____ Wayfinding elements are highly visible - --... .-t..„4-----• -f•_•••!- --, - • ••-• -— -.. -- .--.-',,,H' ,:.•'' •-• --' . ,z7.,-.:--- ..t_T-'-'- : -- 1 l.i.7.__-; ? r 4.. ••'i .re. .. c.:1;:' '..r: :'''2 4 from both the station platforms and -,- ,. , .---..-„,• _i... .,..;.N.., -:,-.-...n,k.".'•;r.: , • .1, .:. i.';•••-..-... -R&M- f.-7 -.• -7 4----'. ------ - -I . , .' •••416111''-.. . .--... '`...:-, _0-ER.•7: :'- Ps 7.- -.4.-7.'.:.•'•-•‘--li . - .,..,. from the surrounding street ,. - - - -- :_._-1,...0-- .__ ., - - -,..,-:,..-9FF- ._._. - ,- ...:"- ..-. _.- . .c•-....i.--.., - . . !kitAi• ''''.- • .4" '' . .. ..,.'•':' i'7.7,:aiiitigt•- -..., .- -7 . . . . 1 . --AdiMM.li.."MilliPP- -•-=':-•-• -4:--.--- ......--' .''.*f::r.:.. :-.. =MNIMEM=...•- •F 4:, .•,:f' ,.. . - • 4./-' .'. •1 ' . ..-7- '.2.`:____ •-. . .i 1 ..=7.-..==r ". .,;,, -•... ... ,.. . •i*.--er ••:...- - . . ''',mai 1111111161111111iiik-1 -4111111163/4..`‘.... .,-7.. • -- • ••'`it. .. . -— ' •'1,,,,,' • ' --' ' - ' " • ! . III 111. • ; • Sctl irneneattsec_aappper:im:irarlotehe'pm..1aennttspavviei ItItient:_pccilt!ircriepi!'ove ' Ili 1 ift.ora iil .3. ..•.•• .-_.a - 1:-1: ---11-IH.w-ar-'-''"'•••-.:'.1-- .'" -i.;.--ii.a--1.'. .....18a-11 1- qt,)'. , -.-1.-..- .---.- Mr the urban tree canopy along the project corridor -:-.-- -...---- ---------.• -- ---1 ' . -.41111.- ', '''-11 (11‘ . II 111: .. ' ;;:- -- . ‘.- 11"...... . .-- f 1 . . . . , -— - ___ .—— • 1P-,• •• ••• ,.. • 1 --. • .-... ?"'- • ..-7- .. • V 4.. . • 0 0 . • _7 . .___,- _. •. . :. _ \ '.i `'''•:.., 000#111."..'r • . -•' . -,., OW' • -• - • __:- . • .;..s...- I .,17:71.'• -^-7,f=.;_,,.. ..!4!- •.'..i:• ' - • • • ..• . . . • - • • - - Raised protected bike lanes and _ - - : • , • . . , ---• • • cx wide sidewalks create a more . . . . • - . . -...., . • • complete multimodal network .. • • • ,........e.-k.4 --.-,- -..•-• .. .."-r,,7 . - • 7411r''..? 744. ..-.LtIZ: ::ti-1:':' .:':7:-. . . . 11 1 Introduction PROJECT PRINCIPLES 1.1 Project Purpose and Values 43 p The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project aims to help MAINTAIN AND the region realize its shared values.To ensure these 4MOVE AND 00 CREATE 1 values encompass this project, a set of principles, CONNECT PEOPLE EQUITABLE goals and objectives have been established.These COMMUNITIES principles and goals reflect stakeholders'adopted visions,strategies and action plans that express the communities'desires and describe what the project _.. would like to accomplish. By measuring the project against these values,the benefits to the region are realized and frame the purpose of this project.This framework has helped steer decisions on the project, PRESERVE AND ' 4 \ ` leading to the preliminary designs defined in this a • a III DESIGN FOR THE document. 0 RESTORE NATURAL FUTURE ENVIRONMENT These principles,goals and objectives ensure that the many contributors to this regional investment continue to have a voice in shaping the project's outcome.They _ serve as a guide for choosing courses of action that help achieve equitable communities,ensure healthy fundingto implement complementary investments.The environments, and provide robust mobility options that 3. Preserve and Restore Natural Environment to P P Y align with our regional goals and design aspirations for preserve wildlife habitat, support the natural objectives relating to each principle and goal are further a sustainable future. environment,and improve connections to nature, defined on the following pages. recreation and green spaces. 4. Design for the Future to build flexible, resilient Please refer to Appendix B for Draft CDR Principles, The four principles guiding the project design are: Goals and Objectives,and the Draft CDR Project infrastructure,support community sustainability, 1 1 1. Move and Connect People to build a safe, minimize the project's footprint and minimize the Metrics. dependable transit system that provides a reliable impacts of potential future hazards. and desirable transit experience, is adaptable to technologies and supports multiple modes on our Moving forward,the objectives will work, along transportation network. with input from community partners,to ensure that 2. Maintain and Create Equitable Communities investments provide the best value and most effective that strengthen existing community and cultural way to achieve project goals.This framework will be resources, retain communities of color and low applied to test options and guide design choices, link income populations, promote equitable access to regional goals to technical decision making, monitor opportunity,generate inclusive economic benefits outputs to ensure accountability,and articulate project and create welcome, intuitive spaces for all. values and priorities to help leverage alternative 12 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT PROJECT PRINCIPLES, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Goal 1:Design and implement a safe,dependable transit project N.. • Design a fiscally stable project to qualify for both a competitive FTA rating and local financial commitment • Locate stations to decrease travel distances between people and attractions • Apply a range of tools to the corridor to optimize ridership (4 .: . . MOVE AND • Prioritize customer safety and apply principles of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design(CPTED) CONNECT PEOPLE • Facilitate local connections and transfers to MAX service Goal 2:Provide an attractive and desirable transit experience / — _ • Design stations and vehicle elements for universal access ' F. °"'~v°~ ,,�•. • '- All - • Provide convenient and intuitive station access� points ,, �i� • Include consistent system elements and wayfinding that is easily identifiable to riders 4� ' _- +! I t, -Y :� ' • Incorporate durable,easy to clean materials to maximize quality and extend service life •' ,' IAET • Optimize facilities for human interaction,usability,and comfort Travel • - r ' • Design stations for clear and easy fare payment Patron Experience Goal 3:Design to adapt to future modes and technology Active Partnerships • As feasible,pilot new technologies to build resilience to industry change and incorporate changing access modes • Pursue strategic partnerships to creatively address first-last mile connections First and Last Mile Connection Goal 4:Support the completion of a multimodal transportation network • Apply a station access hierarchy to protect vulnerable users and prioritize shared modes(bus,shuttle,carpool) • Provide facilities for active transportation users at appropriate station sites • Maintain vehicular capacity of the corridor and minimize infiltration through neighborhoods • Support relevant station access partner projects that increase transit use Goal 1:Preserve wildlife habitat and connectivity to the regional ecosystem 0 • Protect and improve existing plant,aquatic and animal habitat PRESERVE AND • Avoid floodplains and potential flooding areas for station location and/or access RESTORE NATURAL • Support existing efforts to re-create natural areas ENVIRONMENT • Mitigate short-and long-term noise and light impacts on station-adjacent natural environment • Minimize infrastructure footprint in wooded and natural areas Goal 2:Be ecologically responsive and support the natural environment • Seek opportunities to incorporate design treatments that enhance project-associated wetlands and riparian areas • Incorporate stormwater management best practices into project design to improve water quality and stream health • Where appropriate,specify native plants • Provide educational opportunities to highlight the ecosystem value of the corridor Natural Resource Preservation Goal 3:Improve connections to nature,recreation and green spaces Ecological Design • Where appropriate,incorporate new and maintain existing green and open space into the project • Support opportunities to increase links to existing and planned green and open spaces Open Space Access • Maximize opportunity for future tree canopy in project planting design 13 Goal 1:Maintain and strengthen existing community and cultural resources • Protect existing affordable housing and preserve identified historic resources • Prevent cultural displacement of low income and disadvantaged communities of color,especially established nodes of OMAINTAIN AND immigrant and Latino populations QCREATE • Celebrate diversity through contextual design elements that respond to the corridor's varied culture,history and community EQUITABLE • Seek input from local stakeholders to identify essential assets within the corridor and encourage access to them • Minimize footprint of transportation facilities CD COMMUNITIES Goal 2:Promote equitable access to community resources,commerce and transit benefits • Connect to existing regional job centers • Support mixed income and mixed housing developments within walking distance to stations • Support regional initiatives to identify affordable housing opportunities on publicly owned land near proposed station sites lid-. Goal 3:Support creation of welcoming,intuitive spaces for all Community Resource Preservation - • Design stations as high quality public places that will inspire future public and private investment Access to Opportunity • Design pedestrian-friendly,comfortable and attractive streetscapes Inclusive Community Vision • Support city adopted land use plans and initiatives Goal 4:Generate inclusive economic benefits for people and businesses in the corridor • Support small,local and growing businesses 1' • 3 • Catalyze industry,employment and commercial uses near transit stations • Support regional initiative to create affordable housing on publicly owned lands near transit stations • Minimize construction impacts • Maintain transparency to inform stakeholders of project benefits,impacts,opportunities,budget and schedule Goal 1:Build robust,flexible infrastructure to support community sustainability • Foster collaborations to integrate infrastructure into neighborhoods and leverage related investments • • • • DESIGN FOR THE • Acknowledge and design for development adaptability • Design for the impacts of a changing climate ■ ■ ■ FUTURE "NIP" • Apply best practices and standards to manage corridor facilities,property,operations and maintenance • Consider project life-cycle when making design choices Goal 2:Minimize the project's carbon footprint • Support and apply low-energy technologies,including renewable energy such as wind and solar • Encourage low-carbon patterns of development • Optimize material efficiency and specify low-embodied-carbon materials,including those with shorter travel distances • Encourage the use of low-carbon modes of transportation to access the project Flexible Infrastructure Goal 3:Plan responses to minimize the impact of potential future hazards Sustainability • Design to minimize impacts from known natural hazards • Locate and design critical systems to withstand extreme weather events based on future climatic conditions Emergency Response • Promote effective emergency response procedures • Design to minimize impact and potential for human-caused threats 14 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 1.2 Regional Planning Blueprints A�! CLARK COUNTY cis The Portland metropolitan area has long been a national MULTNOMAH 1 leader in regional planning. From pioneering efforts COUNTY . Vancouver establishing an urban growth boundary,to building one 4AMAIN* of the nation's first modern light rail systems,the region , Mill Plain has sought to implement equitable and sustainable • . di solutions as its many diverse communities continue to - ��,i� w-f grow and change. I•.�IiO„� ; Lranasbourne•_, �:I II�;'� ��` The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project represents the • next important step in planning for the region's future. —Hillsboro :'Amber Glen <, 1 Nu, Portland' , -.) • Interstate 5(1-5) south of Downtown Portland is already vim :�_`. _ilm�Gatew,ay •y •0 one of the most congested travel corridors in the region. f ,i_i _ �,� The surrounding communities, known as the Southwest Betoton— �.��s:rA �� Grum milrCorridor,are expected to see 75,000 new residents and 1 Hill'ale ( NM=0 • 65,000 new jobs by 2035.This project will connect the 1 A� •.i�l '�• I Washington 0 important regional centers in the Southwest Corridor WASHINGTON L �� West Portland �i�• to the existing high-capacity transit network, offering COUNTY —Sq r=e 'i.• 0 ,A. - a sustainable travel option to jobs, homes and other • + . •Tigard clac=as destinations for people all across the region. II 0, 1 ••_� Project partners are also undertaking efforts to ensure _ ��-Tualatin mO. Southwest Corridor Light Rail that lower income households and communities • r MAX/WES Commuter Rail of color continue to live,work and thrive in the — Oregon city Southwest Corridor.Through the Southwest Equitable :. g central city Development Strategy,jurisdictional and community `+ CLACKA .s • Regional Center partners are identifying opportunities for affordable Nr COON Y V • Town Center housing,developing job training strategies and helping County Boundaries historically underrepresented community members engage in the planning process. It is important that the Figure 1.1:Metro Growth 2040 Components region's major transit investments support communities that are livable and affordable for everyone. �N s TRI ® a Metro7rreong MET epartment f Transportation ."A OFW. N . . ... . .„..._,,,.., -1r-FIIII§*7t;' i TIGARD 1 Figure 1.2:The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project is a coordinated effort between eight jurisdictions and agencies 15 1.3 Project Overview FAST, RELIABLE TRANSIT FOR A GROWING AREA Expo 7[ The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project will be an 11- Center Airport mile extension of the existing MAX Light Rail system. It will offer a 30-minute ride between Downtown Portland and Tualatin,connecting regional centers including Rose West Portland Town Center,Tigard Triangle, Downtown Quarter Tigard and Bridgeport Village.The light rail is expected Fair Complex/ Union • • to provide 37,500 trips on an average weekday by 2035, Hillsboro Airport Station q f• • which could make up 20 percent of all commuters going ■ 141\t, southbound from Downtown Portland during afternoon Hillsboro •+� :H: rush hours. +* II Pioneer Square � � PSU : Gresham More than just light rail,the project will also include a +*,; ♦� • variety of improvements to make it safer and easier to Beaverton �� Clackamas Town Center get around by all modes. New sidewalks and upgraded *.+ bike facilities will be built along the project corridor ••• Miilwaukie and other key locations. Roadways will be repaved and ♦♦ rebuilt with new upgraded traffic signals.The project will Tigard 1 10. ® Southwest Corridor Light Rail also include major stormwater improvements to treat • o MAX Blue Line the nearly 81 acres of existing impervious surface— all '. Bridgeport o MAX Green Line currentlyunmanaged in the corridor. Tualatin Village g o MAX Orange Line The project will foster equitable communities by o MAX Red Line expanding access to vibrant,walkable neighborhood Wilsonville ® MAX Red Line Extension centers, building stations in identified urban and o MAX Yellow Line suburban centers,organizing local bus service to o WES commuter Rail improve regional connections to light rail and supporting Figure 1.3:TriMet Rail System Map public and private projects to add housing.To achieve this, project partners are coordinating investments with goo to ,,, other local initiatives. 5��`��5a° �� e�\'°o . �\e� .\ `e Qo<. ,`e�fcj'R ,`e o(�`. e��ot�`.�\> \°� �<``"•• `��a e" \��e'�°� `e <0. \. ¢ydeQ°� •O O ��\ O Q O Q �e �• °� G e o� O \o 6 A> d, Jew o�� Jev s� \ eat\9 eat\°�� °PrP �° ee0o"\ <5 ,„. ��a a�.`�o� P�cQ Jr o�\ 0� �� a� 4;„, ,-, ,, Q� ,„ ,„ J N A C§ \� '' pt .\oc` qe ye opo S° �� to 0° esr 1 '� o° 3 0° 0. 5� b q Q5 0� 4, \� bk q'.°��5� 1 Q5 • O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Figure 1.4:TriMet Rail System Timeline 16 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT DOWNTOWN PORTLAND ammo Portland Transit Mall: * The project coordinates with planned Connection to MAX lines, improvements for the SW Naito Parkway Main 26 Portland Streetcar and buses 405 • Street Ross Island Bridgehead Project • Marquam Hill Connector: Gibbs • 26 Marquam Hill Connector • An inclined elevator from Gibbs Aerial • Beaverton TC WES o O Street Station to Marquam Hill Newbury&Vermont Viaducts: k Tram will connect the 18,000 patients, Two 100-year-old viaducts on SW • Hamilton • employees,students and Barbur Blvd will be replaced with residents that visit the campus seismically sound structures, Shared Transitway:Buses every day makingthem safer for all users BEAVERTON traveling to/from destinations SW Multnomah Blvd to the west will be able to skip traffic from SW Capitol Highway to the Portland Transit Mall by SW Taylors Ferry Rd • sharing a dedicated transit-only • 13th lane with light rail An improved SW Barbur Blvd Hall/Nimbus WES streetscape with landscape,sidewalks • 19th s� and raised protected bike lanes 30th d w 0 0- Barbur Transit Center �� • 0- Tigard Transit Center: Downtown Tigard will have more 053rd • SE PORTLAND transportation choices with 217 68th : SW PORTLAND Fd- improved bus connections and b A the new MAX station,a short Tigard Transit (I) � rD walk from the WES station Center/WES O • Elmhurst t. Hall SW 53rd Ave Improvements for people biking and walking, 6,= TIGARD with a potential shuttle to0- 5 PCC-Sylvania,the college's cTo 99W = • largest campus Bonita Oswego Lake Upper Boones Ferry • Bridgeport Transit Center: Bridgeport Transit Center O A structured Park&Ride will Tualatin River increase capacity for regional C. Southwest Corridor Light Rail commuters and bus connections I to create seamless regional - streetscape Improvements TUALATIN connections Q• • Connection Improvements Tualatin WES © Park&Ride #1.11 ""a° Other Rail Transit Major Freeway Figure 1.5:Southwest Corridor Light Rail as a Multimodal Project CONNECTING THE SOUTHWEST I i` =' ' ' CORRIDOR ., y, __ _• _ _ _ Expanding transit options in the Southwest �� • :-7� _ -,-,. ! ; ..� 1' .�— Corridor is essential to the livability andt — � l- --'d i -+ 1 E a lt economic vitality of the region. The project not } i i I l� � , °'.:SIWII `� . ' .,:.- .,:..„.•-:- onlybrings frequent, reliable transit byexpandingI ° - ,L,« '„•_ -. .' s.' �, g q • � I • '� l i I�� ill I , ,i, ; the MAX system, but also invests in safer _- �a� t "The Southwest Corridor is growing • infrastructure for people walking and biking. This �� ""ice ` .., ' �•: — with growth comes congestion, multimodal project contributes to our regional OAR .� �� _ and gettingaround will only goals for mobility, and more equitable • lit .aq-I�= g Y q #II li it - N ' -i communities. As a coordinated effort,the — jI _ —1 l ° •j I�, become more difficult if solutions • Al—:� project sets the stage for many ongoing regional �` ;; are not implemented now” investments. �= In 2019, we had: _ ` � f � -Metro 11111111 people commuting between _ rgie 23 600 IMAGESCURCE TRIMET F Portland and Tigard/Tualatin By 2035, we could see: SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR PROJECT BY THE NUMBERS 37 50a average weekday light rail trips on the Southwest Corridor Light Rail 99999 75,000 neCorridordents in the Southwest 99999 7 •... • ..• percent increase in congestion on 999 1-5 between Portland and Tigard Reliability from PSU to Tualatin: 11 13 30 58 min To be on-time 90 percent of the MILES STATIONS MINUTES auto time in today's weekday PM peak, -VS- one should allow 58 minutes for auto travel time. In 2027, light rail BETWEEN DOWNTOWN PORTLAND AND 30 min will consistently make the same light rail trip in 30 minutes. BRIDGEPORT VILLAGE SOURCE:METRO,2019 5$ --, 0., , ii - I _ S# ib Om STATIONS WILL SERVE MANY '11 , , L..'r p DIFFERENT FUNCTIONS ! •. t : = ' 7 '�l yq't` + 111 ` ' •, Stations serve multiple functions based on rAr ,. ,`r - - A ' where they are located within the community. -� s."1' ;1 -f Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project stations - I iiii ,.. . town centers and employment areas between E will be located within a variety of neighborhoods, - ` '•••,:.• .it k tiL Downtown Portland and Tualatin. Station _ Stations as Destinations Stations That Define Place characteristics help shape the communities they serve from opening day, acting as a framework (6Stations can be a place that li- Stations can embody qualities people travel to for the services of the community through their for what the surrounding area can become in the future through coordinated land use, mobility and and opportunities at the station's ; '' ,architecture and placement placemaking. _„ �, front doorstep. F within the neighborhood fabric. ti .4E1154. '. Yi�r ' .y1, ' 1. # -- - • Project partners will work to understand the - Y . aspirations of communities around each station '" `' -'r •.. - and how this is reflected in design elements that l• - - -- - — , ,- express community character. :.- y-rt , Stations as Connections - • Stations That Add to Place�, .. !�� gess_r_ ' Stations can be a point of arrival 9 Stations can create new plazas -_ - - into the community, designed o 9 -z and landscape features that are to help connect people to where places for people to enjoy,stay they need to be. and linger. `� ----: - MIN w r - f r ,r !ii }L _ EFFICIENTLY MOVING MORE I ' If ;NI : jai. PEOPLE TO MORE PLACES I it ' ....lio, �` "' . - ► The way we get around is rapidly changing, with -; i -` opportunity for new choices. Stations are more / r "� than just places to get on and off light rail;they — -R — are transportation hubs that can connect people ,r rr / - ->:3 to mobility choices-whether itis car share, bike share, electric scooters or ride-hailing - as well Linking Multimodal Centers - Regional Access ,_---„20-47-2- -Ep... as other amenities, such as deliverylockers,wifi a""- f. xtension of the MAX Green Lineprovides hotspots and public gathering spaces. Southwest From Downtown Portland,TiTigard, and r P Corridor Light Rail Project: Tualatin, riders can easily walk, bike and I riders with access to major regional ` take transit to their destination. destinations and improved connections t • Helps maximize person throughput in a = East Portland. • - . congested corridor IlkI �� ;, _ 4Y' • Creates seamless connections between bus, ►` O' , MAX lines and WES Commuter Rail , i . 4: �w • Supports infrastructure investments, roadway '_ , ..-' and stormwater improvements, bus service `~. 3ti_ 40' ' enhancement and active transportation _ _: ,.. ` To Wilsonville infrastructure + + R • Includes 10 miles of new sidewalks and over • . six miles of new and enhanced bike facilities _: - `it _ that encourage active transportation 4� i • Improves access to the Portland Community Vis_ College Sylvania campus -_ -" --141 p 1 171 J r A , • Provides a new transit accessible connection i;''�'1f = IV to Marquam Hill destinations Park & Rides Facilities 0 Commuter Connections '.� • Includes up to 2,000 Park& Ride spaces for sI those traveling on light rail _Park&Ride locations make transit a ... A WES Commuter Rail station in Tiga -- , Mconvenient choice for riders who prefer to , '�., �'.. allows riders to connect to Beaverton and access transit via car. ``:1` Wilsonville. K-.. _-... .-,. ..,_-:-."..;:71,r-.ityr: -,,!; - ._. --_ _.y. 0- - -. -,,.- - - - , ., -. , '1. I 1 i -• . n . , , t. . . . __4 RESPONDING TO LOCAL . ._ -=F. •r1 : CLIMATE GOALS w`_I 1 . .ir _ 41 ' I .. 1, X116 •: 4• The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project is Y � ; • i' �� ` . • expected to reduce daily passenger vehicle miles rr 71/` 1E-.-- `- i Ott, 4 _ iii ff� ��.' II-Wt ' , traveled by about 59,000 miles per day - that's / - ? about 7,000 to 8,000 metric tons of annual _ r'‘'. .i #_' `"' ' greenhouse as emissions. But it may bring f s. " f g g Y g : •� even greater climate benefits by supporting the f- j r _ .,x:, y .rr� £ , = region's growth strategies - stimulating compact --F ---- •.,- . _ :of ". f development so people can make more trips by .- _; walking or biking, while reducing car travel. Other _-_ '"°® i climate benefits include: ,iI' q° i I . . . ,. • MAX runs on electricity and uses �1 'effigy , �I� ,g:: regenerative braking. While TriMet is �� ./!- lir Ar ".`E ' transitioning its bus fleet away from diesel by �ero ss�on� Itlisr � r /4 2040, light rail is a proven green technology —,„•� �_ ,.sr„ r I�. � that has been successful in our region for the ►° r w . F AIF I _ c fig ' past 30 years, accounting for one third of all = �� I . �� fig , 1 ' TriMet trips. �_ �. - ' __L _ � /f, `Ll = ® I� II\A} „ . 3 Li j lJV �I {;I • It's more than MAX trains. The project —AIM�_ - �� ,• • • •1 ' 't includes improvements to the road, bike - l' and pedestrian network, and stations 61J: will be designed to accommodate new _ -. - - . _ -... , transportation technologies. Bus service will be improved to complement MAX and maximize alternatives to vehicle travel. • The project includes green infrastructure to improve the natural environment along - the corridor, supporting water quality,fish - - . r • . '_ IL - . .=,r-;V' � V- ' -`- passage and long-term habitat connectivity. • _,- The project will significantly upgrade � F. `-'�� = stormwater management systems, including • l• ••. � •-- ' "'e+{ •-"7 -., bioswales to filter and slow runoff. # .1r5-F-4. "�' - - _ _ •�`. ”*F �J.Yr" w rtiRSeR� - .+� tl't f Iht-!:-,t Ai,11 ' 64,p 111111 BUILDING A PROJECT FORU dIA i E.E EVERYONE - , . iliFilltbkik' l The Southwest Corridor is a diverse community. I 1:11:111.Project partners strive to ensure that low income - I I J households and communities of color continue to live, • I ' \,, lbw f-or ' work and thrive in the Southwest Corridor alongside this major transportation investment. The project • '* • A , : , ....... adds additional capacity or person-throughput within , I. • .f • -_,„ the Southwest Corridor, allowing more people to move •, " ,i. more places. , — - _ , , i4;r- 1 . . � Within a half mile of the corridor: ` IIIII ;r__ ..., . -• . •y, percent of residents are 's d people of color --- SC 1 8 percent of residents are living on low incomes illpercent of existing jobs are f.,___-----0---- R . a� ,.4.-z-- -. !11111 84 low to medium wage jobs ► w� �� , IX i 11 I ' ` ' 11 t 0 ---71, ..-- , 11#Pj -ir Partners are committed to: . � t"1 �� Lt 1 r - PP I I Lam �, supporting the Southwest -_ ..t w.� w Equitable Development Strategy - I __ I _ 7 4 s ,M `� ■ 525 �" preserving and building more TR,05MFr . " 5c� affordable housing within the = ff�4 9 22° corridor, including a pledge to `_ ' ` identify sites for 950 more units fGFQ'�M1T _ - J AMAX - -- ' • A _ . r--`� : Washington .. - , -. ;' kAuzi...7.:-.1A: V' Park rH r, :,.......'4:-.r.-:,' 4:i, ::#it . '1141: ":.,4,.'-lt CONTRIBUTING TO THE LOCAL ,`5 -' e ` : • ; - 7 -� ECONOMY • -,1 f.4, g,' -- - ' a y _ w :..L.',:.,Rte. Ay, •'Abbe- 4\ .. . { • - . Marquam Hill ;N.." '• 1. _ .7 :. Nature Park , billion dollars of federal funds �= •• amilton▪" °t� $1 .33 leveraged ." .e g �yyyy��='':" ' . Raleigh Hills k,: , peak hour weekday train :ry , -_ : _" ▪ _ '4 , _ " Hillsdale. 4Willamette ;y iz frequencies expected between . -- ; '. . - River • . .r: Uabriel. ". 7.5 min Downtown Portland and - $,,,-. ::` .a ,. vkq Park Tigard, increasing access -`' Multnomah - • - to living wage jobs and Village ,-• 13th 19th ,, educational opportunities Riverview . 30th Cemetery ,; c: 28 000 new jobs expected to be ° .�- Q- Mia ie generated by the project Washington Square Barbur Transit Center r Disadvantaged Business53rd : 3 3 40 - • ' Enterprises (DBEs) already 68th Tryon Creek State contracted for the project }'` Tigard Natural Area design phase 1.404.-......,•:Q hurst '".Y \ . 7�f 11,200 WORKERS . _ _ ., � 0 - ''•{:9,:!.;5::;g ,;%,-:,1<n. " Jt'..4=1. r'._ii PORTLAND Bonita '� ,. `_ . �:i .y r •: 42.411111e14. .-, "' '•J',^`$- Oswego Lake In 2019,there were .,. = • a ,,. . g �r '. iii. F ,/4"•i. _.I . 23,600 people Upper Boones Ferr' • ,, ' commuting between :' : Portland and Tigard/ Cook ,• r; Park a;.., Tualatin Bridgeport Transit Centers °t' `•- 'i g : TIGARD & Southwest Corridor Light Rail n TUALATIN - ; -� °Y s _ �' • Manufacturing and Logistics ' ' ° ' ' • Professional Services 12,400 WORKERS ....: ',-,..,,,,f; ''_ - _.40:a..."` �" yY 1 �;- y" • Healthcare,Education,Government -41::*4i-e'-:,:c.:'-':r-....;;. '... kr, -yrs ,OM1. • Retail,Hospitality,Other Services DATA SOURCE:2017 ONTHEMAP DATA(CENSUS LEND) .,..?,21,::%.:1` _s,yr, ...%''•'`. :��" *One Dot=One Job IMAGE SOURCE:EMPLOYMENT IN AMERICA,2014(ROBERT MANDUCA) Figure 1.6:Er ipIoympnt within the Region 2 PROCESS 24 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 2 Process Successfully completing a project of this size and • - iT complexity is no small feat. Building on the experience of many past light rail projects,the planning process tL .„ - includes significant technical analysis,coordination _ _ r;'; ., -; `' - with jurisdictional partners and continual stakeholder I �" C= engagement.This chapter provides an overview of how II ti the project got here and the decision-making structures r • :* , ,.• that help ensure the region builds the best possible light #. ,� Y '. • ': .�-. f - #, 4 - rail project. • "`�. llik ' 4 �. [ R r 2.1 Understanding Project Impacts ` i ° `, ?. �. _ r - - -' , With such a transformational project, it is critical to -_ _ 11 1 comprehensively evaluate the positive and negative * - =- ; r�• impacts the project could have on the built and natural .. environment,and develop strategies to minimize or avoid - — - i adverse impacts.This technical work is codified under �_. �, — . , � � the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA),which requires major projects to make detailed informationl� about impacts available to the public through an 'r • environmental review.Types of impacts studied include 4 property acquisitions,historic structures,park,visual, !1111;11Pe noise,traffic and water resources.The environmental )1114review also includes studies of alignment alternatives being considered,a"no-build"alternative as a baseline - — IP es. 4 . for evaluating the benefits and impacts of the light - -. - �- a t � rail alternative,and the other related transportation �� or .lk;investments that could complement the project,but +, , N iroassumed to be funded separately. In June 2018,the \ • ,.1 .� Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project published these ' detailed studies in a Draft Environmental Impact Statement(DEIS),considering several potential light ' rail routes as well as options for improving access ,, il to stations.The DEIS analysis and public comments \ \ informed the selection of a Locally Preferred Alternative I ' in November 2018.A Final Environmental Impact r Statement(FEIS) published in the fall of 2020 will i respond to feedback and define the project scope, ,.d ' \ impacts and mitigations. - .; IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET 25 2.2 Key Milestones Since 2011, local leaders have studied how the project can best help residents,commuters and visitors get around the region safely, quickly and efficiently for decades to come. Over the next few years,TriMet will work with partners and communities to refine designs through the next phases of the project, as described in the timeline below. 2011-2018 2019-2020 2020-2022 2022-2027 gt• f Cil, 0 _. - 0 -1 . COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PLANNING Project design is advanced to 30 ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION percent and captured in the CDR. A Shared Investment Strategy is developed Updated project impacts are published Designs are refined and advanced With a Full Funding Grant Agreement through coordination with local planning in the Final Environmental Impact to 100 percent and all local funding from the Federal Transportation efforts and community engagement. A is secured. Property acquisition and Administration, construction, testing Statement (FEIS). Initial project costs Draft Environmental Impact Statement are refined, and 30 percent of local early project construction begins. and training takes place with an (DEIS) is published and released for public funding is secured.A Record of Decision expected start of service in 2027. comment. A Locally Preferred Alternative is made by the Federal Transportation is selected, confirming the general route ilp Community engagement continues throughout all phases. To learn more about Administration. TriMet'sprocess,see Section 2.7:CommunityEngagement and station locations. Figure 2.1:Overview of key milestones JUL A Share nvestment trategy was adopted to coordina JUN A Draft Environmental Impact Statement was Community engagement helped further evaluate and projects that make it safer and easier to walk,bike,drive published with an opportunity for the public to comment 2019 refine route alignment. 2013 and take transit along the Southwest Corridor 2018 on the document. - . igla - x il, • r 1737qtir ID lir (erjEt $ ,N,,,..:.' 0 , . 4 �- `= Filipppi ibli i• 4..,,‘.. . _jiw. --, , \ MOIL to iii, L ... , g MAY The Steering Committee decided on the basic outline a NOV The Metro Council adopts the Locally Preferred JAN The draft Conceptual Design Report is published, of the 11-mile transit corridor from Portland to Tualatin Alternative as recommended by the project's Steering illustrating preliminary designs for the project. 2016 using light rail,rather than bus rapid transit. 2018 Committee. 2019 -El ling 11..1 -,7,- ;; u' ?. - r "Wil • s- �elr L _.1 - i1 '' lb r-&, Figure 2.2:A number of significant milestones have occurred during previous phases of the project 26 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 2.3 Project Partners compliance of stormwater management regulations; AFFORDABLE HOUSING MEMORANDUM OF and support for the affordable housing targets in the UNDERSTANDING (MOU) Project partners are working together to make this Southwest Corridor Equitable Housing Strategy. In 2018,the City of Portland, City of Tigard,Washington project a reality,and have a variety of roles,contributing County, Metro and TriMet made a commitment to leadership,expertise,and funding. Project partners OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND promote affordable housing, business stabilization, include: Metro,TriMet, City of Portland, City of Tigard, CITY OF PORTLAND JURISDICTIONAL TRANSFER employment opportunities,commercial uses at Washington County, City of Tualatin, City of Durham OF SW BARBUR BLVD station areas and other development in the corridor in and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The City of Portland and ODOT have an conjunction with the project.The Affordable Housing Metro was the lead agency from 2011-2018 during Intergovernmental Agreement to jurisdictionally transfer MOU names specific affordable housing production the early project planning and environmental review. SW Barbur Blvd right-of-way currently under ODOT targets from the Southwest Corridor Equitable Housing In late 2018,TriMet took the lead role and is expected ownership and maintenance to the City of Portland. Strategy and provides a framework and statement of to carry the project through design,engineering and This agreement applies where the light rail alignment intent to deliver upon these commitments. Alignment- construction,with continued community engagement. is located in the center of SW Barbur Blvd (north of wide,the MOU aims to create 950 affordable housing Barbur Transit Center), and required that the Southwest units within residentially developable excess property 2.4 Guiding Documents Corridor Light Rail Project design and construct the parcels at station areas. Coordination of these housing, The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project has a suite roadway and transit improvements to the City of economic development and community development of planning agreements that helped establish project Portland's operational conditions and design guidelines. goals relies on a collaboration with community partners. partnerships and outline the project goals.These include: These improvements include, but are not limited,to a complete pedestrian sidewalk network, bicycle lanes, 2.5 Funding CITY OF PORTLAND RESOLUTION AND EXHIBITS safer intersection design, repaving of roadway and replacement of the Newbury and Vermont viaduct The project is estimated at$2.8 billion. Over the next The City of Portland formally adopted the Preferred structures along the defined segment of SW Barbur several months the project leadership is working to Alternative through this document and provided a Blvd. formalize partner local funding commitments. series of priority actions.These resolutions included, but are not limited to:a preliminary project work plan; CITY OF TIGARD MEMORANDUM OF The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project is one environmental clearance of the Ross Island Bridgehead UNDERSTANDING (MOU) of the transportation investments that would be Reconfiguration Project;the importance of providing In 2018,the City of Tigard and TriMet established a funded through Metro's Get Moving 2020 regional three stations in the central SW Barbur Blvd corridor; commitment of both parties to address the land use, transportation funding measure.This package collaboration for redevelopment opportunities at the transportation, redevelopment,economic and fiscal of investments is expected to go before voters in Barbur Transit Center through the West Portland Town impacts that result from the Preferred Alternative November 2020,with $975 million assumed for the Center land use planning process; resolution of the selection.The MOU provides a collaborative framework Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project. Crossroads Area light rail alignment;prioritization of for parties regarding location of stations serving station access, including a collaboration with the City Tigard, improved pedestrian access and multimodal Passage of the funding measure is a necessary step of Tigard on station access projects where investments connectivity to Downtown Tigard, preservation of for the project to move forward into the next phase of also serve Portland neighborhoods; mobility options; the federal fundingrocess,to continue to work toward and Park&Rides in conformance with City land use existing affordable housing, identification of transit- garnering p directives;connectivity to Marquam Hill and Portland oriented development (TOD)opportunities, contextual g g $1.33 billion of discretionary federal funding. Community College;refinements to a downtown treatments for the operations and maintenance facility, connection;integration of key recommendations mitigation of job impacts and inclusion of a multi use from the Barbur Concept Plan as it relates to station path over OR 217 as a project betterment. locations and focus areas;special consideration to "the Woods"area;considerable evaluation given to local neighborhood circulation and business access; 27 2.6 Committees 2.7 Community Engagement e\ God e� STEERING COMMITTEE Continuous community engagement is fundamental ��a� Consisting of project partner elected and appointed to creating a great transit project. Staff from Metro, officials,the Steering Committee (SC) serves as the TriMet and other partners have been talking with the highest level of project decision-making throughout the public about their vision and values for the Southwest project development and final design, representing the Corridor since 2011.Throughout the planning and interests of each jurisdictional partner,and providing design process, staff have used a suite of engagement Steering Committee Community project guidance regarding scope and budget elements. strategies to gather feedback and help inform key Advisory A former project SC was convened under Metro's project project decisions. Project staff regularly attend the Committee leadership from 2011-2018,and TriMet convened a new events and meetings of key stakeholder groups to keep Management & (CAC) Steering Committee in 2019. them updated on project progress,and the public is g always encouraged to share their thoughts during the Technical Staff COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE public comment periods at Steering Committee and Consisting of representatives from broader Community Advisory Committee meetings. Individually communities,the Community Advisory Committee impacted residents, property owners or businesses .\'\ (CAC) advises the Steering Committee and project staff are paired with community liaisons to help minimize ��\S� e�\. by bringing a wide-ranging perspective on community and mitigate impacts as much as possible through the Go0'6 a�e� issues.The CAC reviews technical information, design and construction process. discusses community interests and concerns and provides feedback to project staff. More specifically,with the release of the draft CDR in Figure 2.3:Decision-making process February 2020,the Southwest Corridor Light Rail project team embarked on a robust public engagement effort 41 1allikt to share the designs from this document and gather feedback from the public.The team used a variety of 4.., 1 fl 4 engagement strategies including open houses,focus • �, r "� ,, groups and presentations to solicit feedback from4 All .1 4 ' _ community members.The feedback collected from that w effort are documented in Appendix H.This community �-? ': ;� ,;.• •• --- 4it — feedback is also reflected within the station pages ' * - '�''• �., 1 i (Chapters 5 through 7) of this document, in the section - A; . .p �Y - labeled "Design Values:Applying Community Feedback =.. ,, in Ongoing Design." 0,_[:,. 8.4r. IMAGE SOURCE:TRIME I IMAGE SOURCE:UDIG IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET 28 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 2.8 Creating a Shared Investment 2.9 Equitable Development Strategy SWEDS PROJECT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE SWEDS Strategy Project Oversight Committee(SPOC) The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project is more than The Southwest Corridor Plan envisions a livable, members set and approve project goals,shape and just building high capacity transit,it is about focusing affordable,economically-thriving community with sustain the vision and outcomes and provide project regional growth in a way that helps us achieve our reliable and safe transportation options for every leadership for the Equitable Development Strategy. goals of livability,equity and resilience.The early design resident and commuter. With this vision in mind,the The SPOC will review and approve recommendations concepts in this document build on the long history of SWEDS strives to ensure that lower income households from staff and advisory groups regarding all project plans for communities within the Southwest Corridor, and communities of color continue to live,work and deliverables.The SPOC is an oversight committee made including the Barbur Concept Plan,Tigard Comprehensive thrive in the Southwest Corridor as we invest in a major up of Southwest Corridor project partners, social justice Plan and the Linking Tualatin Plan among others. In 2013, transportation project such as light rail. and affordable housing advocacy organizations, local regional leaders adopted the Shared Investment Strategy, community and neighborhood groups,and business and which identified bike,walk,bus and road projects that This means making sure Southwest Corridor workforce development experts. would complement the light rail project,but be funded neighborhoods have: separately. • affordable housing choices for people of all SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES incomes and cultures The City of Portland's Bureau of Planning and Ensuring that the project provides equitable access • a range of jobs for people of all backgrounds Sustainability is leading an ongoing multi-year land use to housing and economic opportunities is also a • learning opportunities that prepare people for those planning and community development effort to plan for critical goal. In coordination with the light rail planning, jobs healthy,connected and inclusive communities along the partners are currently undertaking complementary • wages that support people's desire to live and work Southwest Corridor.The two key components for this planning processes,such as the Southwest Equitable in the corridor effort include the SW Naito Parkway Main Street and the Development Strategy(SWEDS),the West Portland Town West Portland Town Center planning processes. Center Planning Process,and Tigard Triangle equitable SWEDS was created by a committed group of urban renewal implementation.The Southwest Corridor public, private and non-profit organizations working Equitable Housing Strategy adopted by Portland City alongside community members,and it is now ready Council and accepted by the Tigard City Council in 2018 for implementation.This strategy is the culmination is nested within SWEDS,providing guidance for policy and of years-long strategic discussions about equitable investments for affordable and market rate housing along development along the Southwest Corridor. With a the corridor. significant investment in activities to enable authentic - 1A . community engagement and an achievable strategic vision,the corridor is better positioned to deal with 1 I a possible displacement pressures.The strategy identifies i L....1Et,„ . ( 0' 18 specific actions and organizational champions to Ilead on each.The goal is to put these actions into place { prior to opening day of the new MAX line in an effort 1-146' w r �� r�� to stabilize communities and prevent displacement. . . �- A Southwest Corridor Equity Coalition will guide STAY INFORMED! °Corridor_ �„� implementation of the plan,and initial philanthropic _ - and jurisdictional funding is in place to support Visit our website to learn more about the - ,� 1 implementation. project and how to sign up for notifications ' , __. _� - _ about community meetings and project news. sir.. 'c 2 , . trimet.org/swcorridor IMAGE SOURCE:METRO 29 2.10 Key Next Steps • Elements of Distinction emphasize where riders are within the overall regional system to create Major Milestones Expected Date tangible connections to neighborhoods and their Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)-Published Fall 2020 distinctive qualities. Record of Decision on FEIS allall 2020 aiME • Fixed Elements ensure regulatory compliance Get Moving 2020-Regional Transportation Funding Measure Fall 2020 related to building codes,Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA), operational efficiency and Community Engineeringase Begin 2021 maintainability. Engagement Full Funding Grant Agreement(FFGA)Awarded 2022 • Flexible Elements can be modified to meet (Ongoing) Property Acquisition and ConsMilli 2021 -2026 .mill. neighborhood-specific goals or respond to adjacent development. Final Transit Plan/Bus Routing 2026 Light RI Service Begins 2027 Transit ridership depends on providing safe and Figure 2.4:Major Project Milestones secure facilities to access transit.To accomplish this, the project design and construction will complete a RECORD OF DECISION regional projects,the measure would include a critical Safety Certification process.This process will ensure After the Federal Transit Administration publishes component of Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project's that every new station will meet or exceed guidelines the Final Environmental Impact Statement(FEIS),a local funding.The regional transportation funding established by the ADA and embraces the principles Record of Decision will be issued, marking the end measure will go before voters in November 2020. of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design of a thorough process to identify,avoid, minimize (CPTED).The CPTED principles-natural surveillance, and mitigate possible impacts.The FEIS will reflect PROJECT DESIGN territorial reinforcement, natural access and target the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA),as well as a In coordination with project partners, stakeholder hardening-are used to prevent crime through a Minimum Operable Segment(MOS).The purpose of input and community engagement,feedback obtained designing a physical environment that positively selecting a MOS is to identify a segment of the LPA from the conceptual design report will continue to influences human behavior. that provides the most cost-effective solution with the inform design throughout later stages of the project. greatest benefits for the project.The MOS must be The objective is to follow up on issues raised by this SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES able to function as a stand-alone project and not be report,capture FEIS mitigations, identify opportunities Through thoughtful planning and design,the project dependent on any future segments being constructed. to be pursued during the project's final design, is taking significant steps to minimize the project's To learn more about the MOS selected for Southwest coordinate with current and future planning efforts environmental footprint. During the design and Corridor Light Rail, please refer to the FEIS. by other jurisdictions, inform the project's Conduct of construction of the project, additional efforts look to Construction program and select the appropriate station reuse materials,enhance stormwater treatments, install GET MOVING 2020 - REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION elements for each station area.The project's principles, renewable technologies,carefully select sustainable FUNDING MEASURE goals and objectives will be a fundamental tool in materials and reduce vehicle emissions.There are In July 2020,the Metro Council unanimously referred the shaping these decisions throughout all project phases. also focused efforts to minimize and mitigate impacts, Get Moving 2020 measure to voters. In the 18 months The project's design will be responsive to the character including tree preservation and replacement as a prior, Metro worked with local leaders and the public on and aspirations of surrounding neighborhoods,while project priority. a plan to make it safer and easier for everyone to get maintaining a system-wide identity.To achieve this,the around as the Portland area continues to grow. project defines: DESIGN AND PLANNING REVIEWS This plan includes dozens of projects in 17 major travel • Elements of Consistency establish and reinforce In addition to encouraging participation and input from corridors,as well as additional programs to invest in TriMet's transit system identity, such as signage, the community,the Conceptual Design Report and transit,safety and community stability across Clackamas, information displays,transit shelters, lighting and project details will be presented to a broad group of Multnomah and Washington counties.Among other other amenities. jurisdictional agencies and commissions.The process 41It maw -1tia. -4 30 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT I f ,; ' - will continue through project development phase and in the Final Environmental Impact Statement(FEIS). ' {. ,•'`•• ; ' ;''- include the design and planning commissions for the !I' ++` 4,'. ,: cities of Portland,Tigard,Tualatin and Washington Property acquisitions could begin as early as 2021, r+ +' !.: N. r. + County.These commissions will review the report and once the project is fully funded.This process includes $ o ,, '...''t' PR, be asked to provide input on the project design. environmental studies of each parcel,third-party - / 1 .', 4 appraisal of each parcel's market value and an outside • �r ;. .. ,` ,• '. -k: LAND USE APPROVALS review of these appraisals,followed by the presentation -ei i#'- 7.�" '' Land use approvals may include design review of of an offer of just compensation to each property ,� ' - :c;;.}, - - , .... historic landmarks and contributing resources, owner.TriMet provides specialized staff to assist environmental overlay zones and adopted land use property owners in navigating the complicated rules �'' ' plans. governing acquisition and relocation. - - STATION ACCESS To the extent allowed by governing regulations,the - • - . Although opportunities and strategies for bicycle and project pays for business relocation site searches, • . . pedestrian improvements have been identified and are land, buildings other improvements, moving expenses, • I •'• discussed in the station area sections of this report, utility connections at new locations and small remodel ' 1 • a comprehensive approach that fully integrates bike projects for re-establishment at the replacement ' • •. - _ and pedestrian access with each station area is still location. For residents,all moving costs are paid by the •N ` in development.There will continue to be meetings project,and in some cases rent subsidies are available. • . • - J with bicycle and pedestrian stakeholder groups to 1 4II ■A7 ' finalize the improvement plans. Project partners will FINAL TRANSIT PLAN/BUS ROUTING momI' t, ! _ evaluate separate funding opportunities for the related With the opening of a new light rail line,TriMet - ' --- •,. - _ �-:. , transportation investments to complement the project. typically makes adjustments to the surrounding bus + a, ...,3, .-Y Additionally, project staff are seeking partnerships with network to optimize ridership and service efficiency, - ;. T. i .',.4'?', ,ti -- ' �}1 , mobility providers to expand micro-mobility options and complement the added light rail service.The ;,'11,u .� - . w - •, +'_ throughout the Southwest,cultivatinga network of future vision for transit in the Southwest part of the • - '► options. metro region can be found in the Southwest Service _ ti 7: , Enhancement Plan (SWSEP) on TriMet's website. - PERMITTING --.14 - "' The project team will apply for the necessary CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY 4 - = - � environmental and construction permits and land use Construction is expected to begin in 2021 with private _ `. - approvals during the Final Design and construction utility relocation,advanced utilities and early structures r , -*} . , : • : , phases. A fast-track permittingprocess maybe pursued work. Major track work,civil improvements and station .3 • to ensure timely approvals necessary to meet the elements are expected to start in 2022.TriMet is ..m_` project schedule. committed to minimizing the disruption caused by �: • .1 . •'''.' ,r. • -" construction,and seeks to maintain transparency },• s '•�;r + ACQUISITION AND RELOCATION PROCESS with the community in developing schedules and i _--4 t, l ® • .,r• ' Whenever possible,the region selects rail alignments construction sequencing. Following a system-wide • ' �l + ,�all ' that avoid or minimize property acquisitions or other testing and operations training period, light rail service - ' �V i _-,„ impacts on property owners, however, manyproperty is expected to begin in fall 2027. - - - — J '' p p P Yp P Y p g z '•'i _ , owners, businesses and residents will be impacted. A - _ full disclosure of these impacted properties is included START OF SERVICE: EXPECTED FALL 2027 � # �� t1 _ *` • • _ •F� 1 .. .. ..41. Le . .; 1 ' 111 — 1 3 CORRIDOR CONTEXT 32 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 3 Corridor Context • 3.1 The Corridor in History • • • • Highways such as OR-217 • • connected new suburban • The project builds on the diverse transportation history of • •• • • • • . . communities in, the 1940s • the corridor to create more travel options for more people. •. , , , , , . . • H. ilton • . . . . . . , , , South•er•n•Pa•ci•fi•c•Railroad • • Early History:Prior to European settlement,the •. corridor's gentle grade served as a key trade route ' among the Chinook tribes in the north and the •• BEAVERTON Tualatin/Atfalati in the south. . •• 13th •• •• : •• Oregon Electric Railrd • • 19th Century: The corridor served as the main line ' ' ' ' • • oa • • • sib • of a railroad network that crisscrossed the West 19th" •• .. Hills. Historic railroad lines have 30th • paved the way for today's . trails and highways ,• • Early20th Century:In 1925,SW Barbur Blvd was •• • : paved,becoming a major vehicle thoroughfare rbur Transit •Center serving industrial centers and growing suburban • •j Much of the alignment follows • v neighborhoods to the south of the urban core. •• 21 7 • . 53rd historic SW Barbur Blvd that : CD :68th connected Downtown Portland . • Mid-20th Century:By the 1960's the corridor's , to the south in the 1920's function as the main southern vehicle route into • • SW PORTLAND central Portland was replaced by Interstate-5. • Elmhurst'all•. • • Present:Over the last fifty years,while the makeup TIGARD The 1-5 corridor traces the of the corridor has remained mostly auto-oriented, , 5 path of travel for indigenous ,•' there is growing support for improving connectivity 99... • people on the Siskiyou Trail ••••• • • • ••••••• for people walking,biking and taking transit. Bonita I oad • etnQacificRadt• Oswego Lake r.11 Upper Boones Ferry - south • . it 1 :• " ` -�. Bridgeport Transit Center • Southwest Corridor Light Rail • ` k i'i01- [r W• • . : " .•'Figure 3.1.1•Timeline of• ••or roads and railways from 1800s until today •• . • • Historic Trails =� � ''. :` .• . . . Late 1890's Railroads p.-_4 v Tualatin River t ) I. 1- TUALATIN•'• 1940-1960's Highways -- • Since the 1960s,1-5 has 1960's Highways `��---_.-_ .-. ' become a key connection to and from Portland `- _ Figure 3.1:The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project alignment responds to the corridor's rich transportation and cultural history IMAGE SOURCE:TIGARD PUBLIC LIBRARY AND THE TIGARD HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION 33 3.2 Connecting Neighborhoods Q South Downtown South Waterfront -. ., The Southwest Corridor connects distinct areas to each other and to the larger MAX system. �,•: Tr'4M.'t ' Portland illi j• ,.1t z South Downtown is a busy urban employment area - i'- a and also has the highest concentration of affordable eL housing. Historic Lair Hill includes the residential South Portland/Lair Hill neighborhoods of South Portland and Homestead Inner Portland z to the east,and Terwilliger Blvd and Marquam Hill { • • • destinations to the west. • • Barbur Blvd Historic District and the West Portland - • P Town Center are mixed-residential neighborhoods till �` z g Historic Barbur na10 MAX g that include single family and naturally occurring West Portland ,:-,411A',.1-,.• orange IE affordable multifamily housing. Forty four percent T - Line o Town Center - ,,`. of the population within walking distance to stations and- Woods on this segment of the alignment are renters.CC £� `c sr y�:: Hamilton & E Far Southwest is a residential area and provides Landing students and employees of PCC-Sylvania with • opportunities for housing and services. ~'=;' • ©TRW Dortland Together,Tigard Triangle and Downtown Tigard are Metzger °O land designated town center with mixed-use commercial .. , :r o centers,planned to support much of Tigard's • .. Transit • a anticipated growth.An existing transit center and WESCenter ,-,. • Commuter Rail station lets travelers make regional = _ • Burlingame transit connections.Tigard Employment Corridor w = -}u . - Downtown Tigard Tigard Triangle .= , consists of a mix of industrial and office uses. . .0. - �' Bonita,Upper Boones Ferry and Bridgeport Transit ,.; Center are within walkingdistance to over 10,000 jobs. millil Transit z -- Far Southwest a ' MaxTigard ^� . Bridgeport Village in Tualatin is a retail center with adjacent mixed residential housing. • j g Tuala Retail J „•i:, Transit • - \ - '' Center Tual [Ei TigardEmployment Corridor Figure 3.2:The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project will connect between neighborhoods along the corridor 34 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 3.3 Land Use and Planning ContextC) DOWNTOWN PORTLAND The project supports the vision of the corridor's communities by 26 Central City In Motion 405, aligning with adopted regional and local plans. (ongoing) • Gibbs 26 Central City in Motion(ongoing) Enhanced Transit Effort to plan, prioritize and implement transportation Corridors Plan(2018) improvements in the city's core, including new pedestrian • Hamilton crossings, bus lanes and bikeways. Enhanced Transit Corridors Plan(2018) A plan identifying where transit priority,streamlining and access BEAVERTON treatments that can help make transit more attractive and reliable Barbur Concept Plan(2013) especially for people who depend upon transit. • Barbur Concept Plan(2013) West Portland Town Center • 13th A strategy and vision to achieve community aspirations for a Plan(ongoing) 19th more walkable,vibrant SW Barbur Blvd and guide transformation • to a civic corridor that is a destination for people to live,work, • 30th play and learn. 217 v Barbur Transit Center West Portland Town Center Plan(ongoing) A vision for a healthy,connected,and multi-cultural town center Tigard Downtown • and an action plan to meet the diverse needs of current and future Improvement Plan(2005) • 53rd residents and businesses. 68th Southwest in Motion(2019) Southwest in Motion(2019) • SW PORTLAND A short-term prioritization, refinement and implementation • strategy for planned active transportation investments that Hall provide basic walking and bicycling connectivity where they are TIGARD needed most in Southwest Portland. Tigard Triangle Tigard Triangle Plan District(2017) 99W • Plan District(2017) Land use and development vision for the Tigard Triangle that Bonita advances Tigard's mission to become the most walkable city in • Oswego Lake the Pacific Northwest and supports the district's designation as a Upper Boones Ferry regional town center. Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan(2005) Bridgeport Transit Center • Linking Tualatin(2013) A blueprint for the evolution of Downtown Tigard into a vital, vibrant, mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly town center. Linking Tualatin(2013) Tualatin River Vision for land use changes and increased transit readiness to TUALATIN better link people to jobs and destinations throughout the region. Figure 3.3:The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Projects regional vision is derived from a number of local plans 35 3.4 Equitable Transit-Oriented Development 0.- Advised by a team of economic and architectural 26 405 consultants,the project has begun a holistic review of the affordable housing supply and demand along • Gibbs 26 the length of the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project alignment.This review is primarily focused on identifying how partners can deliver the affordable • Hamilton 0 housing development goals that were agreed upon zz in the October 2018 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed by TriMet, Metro,Washington County,and I— (MOU) BEAVERTON the Cities of Portland and Tigard (Appendix C). a To ensure balanced development,and equitable • neighborhood growth without displacement,the • 3th 2018 MOU established minimum targets of 600 new ' h affordable housing units on surplus project land • 0th in the City of Portland and a minimum of 150 new • affordable housing units on surplus project land in the '" .Barbur Transit Center City of Tigard. Although the extent of the surplus land _ rb portfolio will only be known once the right-of-way(ROW) _ • acquisition process is finished,TriMet is committed to • rD identifying opportunities and supporting partners in 68th developing affordable housing opportunities whenever it can.This approach will ensure that partners can meet • • SW PORTLAND the MOU goals as quickly as possible by allowing,where Hall possible,affordable housing development to begin TIGARD before the final light rail project completion. z This Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project objective � QOM/ Bonita•` 5r complements TriMet's agency-level initiative to deliver = 1. Oswego Lake equitable, inclusive and community-focused transit- 1— • oriented development(TOD)across the region,as °a Upper Boones Ferry 0 outlined in its TOD Guidelines. At a high-level,these oc ), guidelines seek to promote mixed-income and mixed- 0 Bridgeport Transit Cent- • use developments that fit in with their surrounding P communities and deliver new housing, opportunities and amenities to neighborhoods without displacement of existing residents,communities,cultures or Tualatin River TUALATIN businesses.TriMet's TOD guidelines can be found in Southwest Corridor Light Rail Appendix I. m Half-Mile Walkshed Figure 3.4:Project partners alignment-wide affordable housing commitments 36 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 3.5 Natural Features 0 WILLAMETTE RIVER The project works to protect and improve the rich natural WATERSHED environment within the corridor. r Topography along much of the Marquam corridor creates significant challenges Nature Park • The light rail project will cross twenty different streams, for stormwater management interacting with important local watersheds including Tryon, Stephens, Red Rock and Fanno Creek Watersheds.The 6Hamilton Fanno Creek Terwilliger ' project will leverage infrastructure investments to improve Ross Island Natural Area Parkway fish passage, long-term habitat connectivity and water ; Natural Area quality in these watersheds. A majority of existing streams ` crossing the alignment are enclosed in pipes or culverts Oaks Bottom • With its varied topography of steep slopes and deep Wildlife Refuge valleys,the corridor is a challenging area for stormwater oa `` i Stephens Creek management.The project will include major improvements sc:. 13th to help treat the nearly 81 acres of existing impervious FANNO CREEK Woods Memorial 19th River View surface—all currently unmanaged in the corridor. WATERSHED Natural Area 030th Natural Area Ash Creek • _ • Some of the area's largest stands of urban trees exist on the Greenway Dickinson Barbur Transit Center 63 slopes of the Tualatin Mountains,just west of the light rail Park Woods Loll Wildwood Maricara route, including Marquam Nature Park,one of the largest 68th ♦♦ •• Arnold Creek ♦ 53rd Natural Natural AreacD parks in Portland. In areas where the project cannot avoid Natural Area m' Red Rock Sylvania Area impacts to these natural areas, mitigation measures will beCreek Natural Area implemented. CPPB ; Park TRYON CREEK Tryon Creek Woodard WAT`_RSHED State Natural Area Park IIIII°Elmhurst • As part of the Section 4(f)process,the project is in Hall Fanno Creek yo consultation with the FTA and Portland Parks&Recreation New opportunities to address Park c). to identify possible mitigation opportunities for natural areanearby degraded streams, \- impacts,which may include; such as Red Rock Creek • Contribution towards local recreational trail investments Bonita There will be improvements to • Contribution towards natural resource management the health of salmon-bearing plans streams along the corridor • Improvements to the parking area,driveway access and Upper Booties Ferry OSWEGO CREEK accessible route at Duniway Park,as well as new trees, WATERSHED ,,-~\ planting areas and stormwater treatment Bridgeport Transit Center ` • An enhanced retaining wall design at Lair Hill Park that fits I Southwest Corridor Light Rail within its unique context and minimizes impacts to existing Sweek Woods • Watersheds tree roots Natural Area Canal Acsµ N.turalAr,a Tree Canopy . • Interpretive signage, invasive plant removal and rualatin River• 4, Parks and Natural Areas understory plant restoration within the Terwilliger SUAM CREEK Parkway • IhWNotable Streams • Tree mitigations beyond Title 11 WATERSHED Stream Crossings I Figure 3.5:The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project connects a system of diverse habitats,watersheds,and waterbodies 37 _ t 4. . 3.6 Trails and Parks ,s Trai #6 The project will provide access to the variety of �_ �r parks, natural areas,active transportation options Dun'wa Park : 2 ' p p �S Y �� Si Lair Hi arks and recreational opportunities that weave through a'9oa • I. ,, the Southwest Corridor communities.Two major trail T'dv •, .ki.k networks intersect with the alignment at multiple stations. • . • sw • I� milto • Tragi•'- • Metro Regional Trail System:Spanning across five Terwil iger Parkw y$i cities and two counties,this 15+miles of paved BEAVERTON —�......,� move . and unpaved trails provides bike, run and walk ,writy +j.� A opportunities across the Southwest region. A key GeorgeHimes '.r, !Si -1-0 connector is the Fanno Creek Trail,which is planned J Willamette Park Fano Sw Gall Par �i SW I •_�J�i FultonParkto extend from the Willamette River in Southwest Creek Trail ai �r � � 1 th Portland to the Tualatin River in Durham.The project • intersects the existing Fanno Creek Trail at the Bonita Spring Garden P.rk.!.51 9th Station. Woods Memorial Natural Area® • _ / 30th' • SW Trails Network:With seven defined routes,this ^ 'Barbur Tran sw community-driven initiative supports a growing Dickinson Park �le 5�. , ,• t 'r�aiT S"' °� network of urban trails through Southwest Portland. Metzger Park® swrraiI#� �� a 1, �. Using low traffic streets and citizen maintained • ' d °'� 68th Holly Farm Park o 11 connections,SW Trails connect neighborhood 0/ �centers,schools, parks and more.Two of SW Trails ' esser Parkroutes are designated as part of the larger Regional �f • •ElmhurSW PORTLANDTrail System.The project intersects SW Trails at the HaGibbs Street, 19th Avenue and Barbur Transit Center IFanno Creek Park �i T�9ardto[ ` -Stations. TIGARDOswego Trail Bonita Park f • Pedestrian improvements on and near SW Barbur Blvd 99W • will ensure that almost every station is within an easy, Bonita aUkte tad \ 10-minute walk of a neighborhood park or natural area. ,.4 • ott+oMi1W Southwest Corridor Light Rail i Upper Boones Ferry grid9ep Existing Pedestrian Trail l - :1 ► ! _Cook Par . i �i Dur City Park — —— Planned Pedestrian Trail :3 g•— ►t p Iridgeport Tra�T l 'enter Existing Multi-Use Trail i a ! . Planned Multi-Use Trail ii, • HEW i' r , __ 1L Existing On-Street Connection R — —— Planned On Street Connection TU/ ATIN i 1 i ! 1 _ , • • • • Conceptual Trail �l' )•• I � ! t • . Parks and Natural Areas IMAGE SOURCE:METRO Figure 3.6:The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project connects parks and natural areas through a system of planned and existing regional trails 38 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Project Description 2035 STATION ACTIVITY AND ACCESS Total Mode of Access A What about bikes?Section 3.7 (Ons/Offs) 3.7 Connecting Riders to Their Destinations outlines how projected bike demand has been studied along the corridor 12 65 By2035,people will take 37,500 dailytrips on the new 8000 PERCENT PERCENT p PAUTO WALK MAX line.The highest ridership is projected at Bridgeport LL 7000 Transit Center,and the Gibbs Street and Hall Boulevard N 6000 Stations(See Figure 3.7).The design of each station area o soon will consider how to facilitate safe access to transit for o these different trip types and rider volumes.The ridership Q 4000 23 analysis conducted through regional modeling includes N 3000 TRANSFER walking,transfer and auto activity as travel modes for their 2000 PERCENT ridership calculations per federal standards.Walking is 1000I Legend the primary mode of access to transit,as reflected withIIIIII • Walk o , • Transfer(Bus/WES) 65%of riders projected to access their light rail station by s� �� P foot in the Southwest Corridor. Biking to stations is also an G`oo �P,kx�� 1� '\°) ,b% �o�`��G 5%�0 `0% _,,,,os' \\P' oo`�x��S<<'R Qoc��G Pick-up/Drop off) essential mode of access.While bikes are not quantified $ ooh xoc, in the ridership mode splits,project partners recognize the �QQ<c�o �'`� Source:Metro,2019 need to invest in bicycle infrastructure,both to support biking as an alternative to single occupancy vehicles and Figure 3.7:2035 projected daily station activity(37,500 total trips)and mode of access.*Note:An additional 7,600 projected daily as a means to accessing transit. See the"Biking"section trips are expected at Gibbs Street Station from buses in the shared transitways on the following page to learn more about how the project is studying bike catchments and projected bike use STATION ACCESS HIERARCHY around each station area. The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project has applied a modal hierarchy for station access(Figure 3.8). Project partners VISION ZERO continue to assess how to best connect people to each station,both on opening day and in the future. The following Vision Zero is a nationwide strategy to eliminate all hierarchy targets a shift in mode share toward transit,active transportation and shared modes.Achieving access traffic fatalities and severe injuries while increasing improvements rely on a variety of coordinated analysis and tools listed below and explored in Section 4.12 Station safe, healthy and equitable mobility for all. In 2015, Access Toolkit. For more detail on how an expanded mobility framework could be applied throughout the project Portland City Council passed a resolution adopting area,see Chapter 4. For more detail on how access modes are applied to specific stations,see Chapters 5-7. Vision Zero with a goal to eliminate deaths and serious injuries on Portland streets by 2025.The Southwest • a. Corridor Light Rail Project is committed to at A IZI IR transportation system that is centered around safety to achieve these same goals throughout the alignment. WALK BIKE TRANSFER MOBILITY SERVICES AUTO Street improvements will modernize roadways creating Mixed use and mixed income Bicycling increases access to Local bus service feeds Transportation technologies Private vehicles provide development at stations transit and provides an alternative high capacity transit. increase mobility and access access to transit. safe access to transit, increasing permeability of high increase walk access to transit. to single-occupancy vehicle use. to transit. traffic roadways, protecting bicyclists and supporting safe routes to schools. Tools:TOD,public realm Tools:Bike parking facilities, Tools:Bus routes and Tools:Allocate space for Tools:Park&Rides, improvements,pedestrian lanes and sharing stops,WES connection mobility solutions roadway and access facilities improvements Figure 3.8:The projects station access hierarchy emphasizes safe access to and from the station for transit and active transportation modes DOWNTOW _ ______39 ' �'6ftT :. 0 WALKING Walking is the primary means to access transit. For BEAVERTON 26 I SOUTHWES1 05 �, `,` light rail stations,a half-mile walkshed is considered `, HILLS \„"y The three-mile bikeshed reflects __ i ,1 a walkable distance.The project builds approximately the boundary of study for bicycle • �..�,b 26 ten miles of bi-directional sidewalks,safely connecting access to transit , % . I i i ' transit to businesses, residences, parks,trails, and open , ' space.Transit-oriented development that provides a BRIDLEMILE HOMESTEAD; I111ltOh. , mix of land uses and residents with mixed incomes, HEIGH S support transit ridership and helps increase walking / HAYHURST SOUTH and biking,to support lifestyles that can be less The dashed catchment area reflects ; HILLSDALE , PORTLAND lip auto dependent.Walkshed assessments considered where people would likely bike to -'-y MAPLEWOOD existing barriers, station demographics,and local land or from a station. it _ ; uses to understand the relative demand for walking MULTNOMAH • L and suggested improvements.Active transportation ```'' - ' • 13th:" gg p p -, GARDEN,-'" • planning for Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project ------ HOME ASHCREEK 'd .th ' SOUTH -s% • BURLING/NE complements work conducted by jurisdictional and '•' II • i-i' , agency partners in their adopted plans, including ii 3 I th coLtrNs Portland's Transportation System Plan (TSP), PedPDX, I CRESTWOOD O MARKHAM': VIE / METZGER 4,Barbur Tr nOIt,Center.'_-__- Southwest in Motion (SWIM),Tigard Triangle Plan, y WEST PORTLAND Vs's % 1 and the Safe Routes to School program,as well as the ;, O PARK ,•, tARNOCD % .`' �-I • CREEK'5 ,} region's Shared Investment Strategy. TIGARD 217 TIGARD - , t TRIANGLE 68th FAR I I `� -- ' - (0) `f , ` ',. DOWNTOWN $ SOUTHWEST The half-mile walkshed around each BIKING TIGARD O • hurst station defines what destinations The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project will contribute Hall can be walked to in 10 minutes. to new opportunities for bike connections to transit and I between destinations. Station area bike catchments 1 `., and a bike parking analysis were completed for the 5 LAKE FOREST project.A bike catchment area is defined as three-mile99W Bonit. • r I - distance from the transit station. While the project's ._____- ! I , ,' ridership does not account for bikes,the project studied DURHAM ROAD • Oswego Lake, various geographic conditions such as slope, proximity I Upper Boones Ferr a LOWER BOONES ; to transit,existing and planned bike infrastructure in the DURHAM FERRY corridor and rider behaviors to determine appropriate gtfdge�rort Transit Cent bike parking quantities at stations. The catchment area process helps illustrate what , - Tualatin River Southwest Corridor Light Rail neighborhoods and local origins/destinations are _____________' Half Mile Walkshed served,and how far-reaching the coverage areas TUALATIN --- i DOWNTOWN may be, based on existing and planned facilities.The TUALATIN _msoe Three Mile Bikeshed catchment contributes to the project's understanding of ---- Estimated Bike Catchment Areas the relative demand for cyclists traveling through or to a — ' Figure 3.9:Walksheds,bikesheds and the bike catchment for stations along the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project 40 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT station,and is included into a broader framework to be HIGH HIGH STATION BIKE USE used with project partners and other organizations to 4` Stations serving the highest demand for personal bike parking,with a high need for secure long-term bike parking options. invest in bicycle access for each station. FACTORS: • High relative station usage BIKE PARKING • High number of pedestrians Bike parking lockers,short-term racks and/or secure >, • Low availability of auto parking enclosed bike&ride facilities are proposed at each n 1_ 1 • Connected, low stress bike network station.This analysis has resulted in a set of typologies I I • • Large bike catchment area (Figure 3.10)that define the character of each station • Funneled bicycle use to stations due to significant man-made or and estimate the type and quantities of bike parking I I r natural barriers beyond the station (eg. highways or hills) needed to support station access and anticipated bike commuting behaviors. While the analysis defines a 7 1 J I 1 n station typology for opening day,future conditions and behaviors may shift the station typology over time. MEDIUM STATION BIKE U S E Stations serving a moderate demand for personal bike parking. iv•-;. 1 , .;, .' FACTORS: �l�`. — tom: • Medium relative station usage �ir."-- ......--1- , , - \, _ J • Medium number of pedestrians •Small lots for moderate availability of auto parking T I - I • Connected bike network � - _ --- A • Moderate bike catchment area • Potentially some funneled bicycle use due to man-made or natural "` i_- barriers beyond the station(eg. highways or hills) LOW STATION BIKE USE —��.-.---'. 'Z'‘-`-"--- O 3 Stations serving a lower demand for personal bike parking. . ,.-,- ,-. - 4 . i , FACTORS: r�--. - a. Fr _AL �.�. J� • Low relative station usage r• _' - +r — • Low number of pedestrians •'i' I. �._ • Large lots for high availability of auto parking . . - i '711.- ,',_ - - I- .! I ,i,_, I I . • Disconnected bike network �, : .r �= -' - ` �f. +C ® •Small bike catchment area "� ` f/ �7 'ii �` "='' di _ 4 �, EXAMPLES OF BIKE PARKING AT STATIONS Figure 3.10:Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project bike parking typologies 41 M TRANSIT&TRANSFERS DO NTOWN Bus transfers link riders into high capacity transit.The P1'TLAND %;m Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project will provide nearly Portland ransit Mall 1 23%of light rail riders with a connection to other local iqp and regional transit including: ® m �1') bit at -'MES©D I� • SMART buses at Bridgeport Transit Center �,: �• amilton • Portland Streetcar in Downtown Portland eaverton Transit Center ® ©� • C-TRAN buses in Downtown Portland 61 m m �c l 1 • WES Commuter Rail and Yamhill County Transit in m HILL BALE , 43 Downtown Tigard --a `8UTH • MAX Blue, Red,Yellow and Orange lines in m 0 ` .TLAND Downtown Portland.Trains serving Southwest '$ et m 44 Corridor Light Rail Project stations will continue I 92 MULTN�MAH •j 1 ' :h through Downtown Portland onto MAX Green Line 19 e • TriMet buses(nearly every station) I ASHCREEK • B RLINGAME • ODOT POINT bus service 43 30th MARKHAM • Clackamas County and City of Tualatin's planned 0 0 3 CRESTWOOD third-party shuttle(Tualatin to Oregon City 92 at = rbur Transit C 'tell . \I connection) Q 0 m m Q/ 53 jd m With the addition of Southwest Corridor Light Rail 4GER service,TriMet will make changes in the bus network 0 ei m0. 68 FAR ,,, to maximize ridership,create new connections and -;-'10 OUTHWES--"-' minimize duplication. For purposes of 2035 ridership Tigarr!Transit Cente Q Elmhurst modeling, planners have made assumptions about potential bus service changes, but a final service plan ® I\_mmm will be developed in consultation with riders in the �■ future. • LA CE FOREST Lake Oswego Transit Center 89 Bo ita '41114 i Planning assumptions were based largely on TriMet's • ©m Southwest Service Enhancement Plan (SWSEP),which Upper Boones Ferr/ � was developed from an extensive public engagement 36 iC. al& process in 2015. For more detail on which bus routes In addition to light rail service,the Southwest are planned to connect with each light rail station,see Bridgeport Transit enter Qt ---- Corridor cane expect to see improvements to Chapters 5-7. \_ f DURHAM 76/ bus service. By adding high-capacity transit to the region,TriMet is able to remove duplicative About a year prior to beginning Southwest Corridor mm ' - service currently provided by buses and Light Rail service,TriMet will engage riders in a public (( implement other service improvements identified process to revisit these assumptions and confirm a bus Di �WNm in the Southwest Enhancement Plan. service plan that serves future needs while minimizing TUALATIN m service duplication. Figure 3.11:Potential bus network with the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project 42 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 0 MOBILITY SERVICESSTATION ACCESS PROJECTS have on vehicular circulation throughout neighborhoods The project seeks to improve access to transit by adjacent to the corridor. In 2012, project partners assembled a comprehensive providing space within streets or at stations that list of planned local infrastructure projects that support partnerships with private mobility service The FEIS is performing an in-depth study to identify increase connectivity and support land uses in the providers.To better understand the range of services, neighborhood access and traffic issues, as well as Southwest Corridor.The Shared Investment Strategy, and likely users,the project initiated a study to highlight potential mitigations.The results will be used to adopted in 2013 by the project's Steering Committee, how factors throughout the project area,such as inform project designs. Proposed traffic mitigations, recommended a narrow list of strategic roadway, bike, environmental characteristics, land use mix and such as signals and the design of u-turns and turning and pedestrian projects that could be part of the light population attributes of those living or working near a movements and intersections,will be refined to provide rail project.These projects were selected for their station, may influence viability of those services. adequate vehicular circulation, maintain access to ability to expand access to the proposed Southwest neighborhoods, minimize the neighborhood cut- Corridor Light Rail Project stations.As prospective For example,the location of a major destination may through traffic,and ensure that local streets maintain light rail alignments were narrowed,these station make the investment in bike share or e-bikes more primarily local access.The Southwest Corridor Light access projects continued to be filtered to retain only likely,while a large population of car-free households Rail Project will also maintain access for emergency those maintaining a nexus with the current light rail might influence the use of on-demand ride hail services. response, including fire truck vehicles along SW Barbur alignment.These projects will be included in the FEIS Blvd to neighboring streets.The project will similarly for environmental clearance, but are not included in the Stations serving populations of lower-income maintain access for business,commercial and freight Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project budget.These individuals were given careful consideration. activity along the corridor. See Chapters 5-7 for more projects could be designed and built by the project Opportunities for mobility services are explored in information and details about station neighborhood (TriMet), if other funding sources are secured. Project more detail in Chapter 4, and for each station in access. stakeholders will continue to seek public input as these Chapters 5-7. Design integration of space to support identified access projects are prioritized for potential partnerships with mobility service providers will take PARK& RIDES future implementation. place during Final Engineering. Park&Ride facilities serve riders traveling from farther distances or from locations without convenient transit Through the Southwest in Motion (SWIM) process, service to access the light rail system. Community the City of Portland and community advocates AUTO engagement in Spring 2019 helped define the quantity, have also been planning a short-term prioritization, In addition to active mobility infrastructure for people locations and type of Park& Rides in the Final refinement,and implementation strategy for planned walking and biking,the project is making investments Environmental Impact Statement(FEIS).These facilities active transportation investments to improve walking in roadway infrastructure to improve safety, maintain have been refined from those studied in the Draft and biking connectivity in Southwest Portland. capacity,and retain access to individual businesses Environmental Impact Statement(DEIS)to account for SWIM presents a two-step prioritization plan for and residences. Approximately 12%of light rail riders adverse effects and projected demand.All proposed implementation that includes top tier and second tier are expected to access their station by car,through Park&Ride quantities could be reduced subject projects. For more information on this effort, please pick up/drop off trips and also Park& Ride usage. to further traffic studies and design refinements. visit: portlandoregon.gov/transportation/SWIM. Changes to local circulation and property access are Information on the size,type, and location of Park& being designed to reduce impact to neighborhoods. Rides can be found in Section 4.12. A full list of station access projects and the project The dramatic topography of the Southwest Corridor has prioritization process is outlined on the following resulted in a network of streets that follow contours pages. Access projects are further documented in more often than creating a uniform street grid pattern. Chapters 5-7. Because of this,the project is sensitive to the existing street connections and impacts that the project could 43 A STATION ACCESS PROJECT PRIORITIZATION 1. 1st Bikeway A0 The bicycle and pedestrian projects within the Shared Investment °I Strategy were further assessed to maintain those relevant to the light rail 2. Grover Bikeway _f ,�.,p 0 10 3. Hamilton Sidewalks and Bikeway route selected in the LPA. Project staff used the criteria below to evaluate curbs. each project's ability to achieve project goals, in order to prioritize 4. Terwilliger Bikeway z station access projects within each jurisdiction. With the release of the 5. Chestnut Bikeway draft CDR in February 2020,the Southwest Corridor Light Rail project 6. 13th Sidewalks and Bikeway 0 • Hamilton team gathered feedback from the public on station access project 7. Custer Sidewalks prioritization.This input is has been added to Figure 3.13 Station Access 8. Custer Walk/Bike Bridge B Project Prioritization Matrix and is documented in Appendix H. 9. Capitol Hill Sidewalks and Bikeway B CORE QUESTIONS 10. 19th Bikeway How critical is the Station Access project to provide access to 11. Troy Bikeway "q. proposed light rail transit? 12. Spring Garden and Dolph O 4-0 • Proximity: Does it connect directly to a proposed station? Sidewalks and Bikeway 9 •,13th 11 • Amenity Access: Does it serve a community asset? 13. 24th Sidewalks and Bikeway 19 • 0 • Equitable access: Does it serve low income and disadvantaged 15 ay)At 14. 26th Sidewalks and Bikeway -� communities? 14 ' • Barriers: Does it cross physical barriers with potential to 15. 30th Sidewalks 3ot increase ridership? -0- o m Barbur Transit Center I How important is the project in terms of safety and adopted plans? e �u �-,,, • Auto volumes: Is it on a high volume roadway? C 0 53r • Crash history: Is there a history bicycle and/or pedestrian 68th o injuries or fatalities? • Local and regional plans: Is it prioritized in any adopted plans? 16. Taylors Ferry Sidewalks and Bikeway 4) 17. 40th Sidewalks and Crossing What are the anticipated construction-related costs and concerns �m . Elmhurst of the project? o all 18. Capitol Sidewalks and Crossings • Impacts: Is the project high risk? 19. Luradel Walk/Bike Bridge • Cost:What is the estimated cost? `� 0 20. 53rd Walk/Bike Bridge 21. Pomona Sidewalks and Bikeway RANKING CRITERIA 22. Pasadena Sidewalks and Bikeway Usingthe RankingCriteria below,suggestedpriorities are defined as: Bonita 99 23. Barbur/PCC to Triangle Connection • Funded: Project is funded and will be completed ahead of the 24. Baylor Sidewalks Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project Upper Boones Ferry �`T' 25. 72nd Sidewalks and Bikeway • High: Project has highest benefits;implement first pending • available funding 26. Hall Sidewalks • Medium: Project has high benefits;fund and implement after 0 27. Bonita Sidewalks and Bikeway high priority projectso • Low: Project28. Carman Sidewalks and Bikeway has lower benefits, is redundant to other access Bridgeport Transit Center d 29. Lower Boones Ferry and Boones Ferry Bikeway projects,and/or has no nexus with the LPA 30. Highway 217 Walk/Bike Bridge Figure 3.12:Southwest Corridor Station Access Projects 44 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT STATION ACCESS PROJECT PRIORITIZATION MATRIX FEIS Reference criteria S rin 2020 Draft CDR ID# Project Sponsor Support from Support from Project Name Amenity Equitable Overcomes Higher Auto Comments (not Proximity Access Access Barrier Volume Crash History Plan Priority Risks/Impacts Costs Funding In person/ Community rank) Status*** Online Surveys Groups Portland Projects Segment A and B 1 1st Ave Bikeway No Low High Low Local Medium 2ntl tier SWIM* Low Low Low I The city's SW Naito Pkwy main street project is the Highest Priority. No Priority The city's SW Naito Pkwy main street project is the 2 Grover Bikeway No None High Low Local Low to None assigned Low Low Low Highest Priority 3 Hamilton Sidewalks&Bikeway Yes None High Low Local Medium 2ntl tier SWIM Low Low _ High Direct,equitable station access 4 Terwilliger Bikeway Indirect Low Low Low Major collector Low to None Top Tier SWIM Low Low Medium 5 Chestnut Bikeway No None Low Low Local Low to None No Priority Low Low Low assigned 6 13th Sidewalks&Bikeway No None LOW Low Local Low to None No Priority Low Medium Medium assigned 7 Custer Sidewalks Yes Low Low Low Local Low to None ive project Low Medium Funded 11M- I 8 Custer Walk/Bike Bridge Yes Medium Medium F High Over Interstate N/A Not in adopted High;4F& High Medium South 1-5 plans Constructability Burlingame NA I Portions Funded, 9 Capitol Hill Sidewalks& Yes Medium Medium Low Major collector Low to None Top Tier SWIM Medium High (Funding High * Funded portions est completion by 2022.High priority Bikeway Uncertain) gap;Stephens creek to Bertha Blvd Low Low Expected completion:Spring 2021,High priority gap; 10_ 19th Bikeway in Yes Low Major collector Low to None Top Tier SWIM Low Low Portions Funded High Infill between prolect limits and 1-5 Bridge Funded K.Completi 11 Troy Bikeway No Medium Medium Low Local Low to None Active Project Medium Low (Funding 2022 Uncertain) Spring Garden&Dolph Medium Top Tier SWIM 12 Sidewalks&Bikeway Indirect Medium Medium High Speed Major collector High (West only) Medium High High Potential to phase 13th to Taylor's Ferry 13 24th Sidewalks&Bikeway No High Medium High Medium Traffic Local Low to None Top Tier SWIM Low Medium Not Funded , High High Funded portions out completion Fall 2022.Medium 14 26th Sidewalks&Bikeway No Medium Medium 1-5 Local Medium Active project Medium Medium Portions Funded Medium? priority gap; -5 underpass to Dolph/28th Direct,equitable station access.Relates to Partner 15 30th Sidewalks Yes High High Low Local Low to None 2ntl tier SWIM Low Medium High project D;SW 30th Barbur to Dolph 16 Taylors Ferry Sidewalks& Yes Low Low Medium Traffic Minor Arterial High Top Tier SWIM High;E-Zone& High High * Relates to Partner project D;SW 30th Barbur to Dolph Bikeway I Creek No Priority Funded portions est.complete Fall 2022.High priority 17 40th Sidewalks&Bikeway Indirect High Medium High Low Local Low to None Low Low Portions Funded assigned gap;Huber to Wilbard. 18 Capitol Sidewalks&Bikeway No High Medium High Medium Traffic Major collector High Active project Medium High Funding * Funded portions est.completion Fall 2022(note: Uncertain funding uncertain).High priority gap;Huber to Barbur High No Priority Medium: Crestwood NA, 19 Luradel Walk/Bike Bridge No Medium Medium 15 Over Interstate N/A assigned Constructability High Medium HAKI focus Between stations.May not qualify for FTA funding group Very High: Significant High Not in adopted High Risk.Relates to SA project#22.Redundant to 20 53rd Walk/Bike Bridge IIIIs Medium Medium 1-5 Over Interstate N/A plans Design& High Medium * Ash Creek NA walk shed for 68th Station. construction challenges Funding 21 Pomona Sidewalks&Bikeway Yes High High Medium Traffic Major collector Medium 2'tier SWIM Medium High High * High prioritygap;SW 53rd to Capitol Hwy 22 Pasadena Sidewalks& Indirect Low Low Low Major collector Low to None Top Tier SWIM Medium High Low Relates to SA project#20 Bikeway 23 Barbur/PCC to Triangle No Medium Medium Medium Traffic Major collector Low to None 2ntl tier SWIM Medium High Low * Connection Tigard Projects Segment C _ 24 Baylor Sidewalks No None No Low Local low to none Not in adopted Low Low Low plans 25 72nd Sidewalks&Bikeway Near Elmhurst& None I Near Elmhurst& Medium Traffic Minor Arterial High High Priority Medium High Medium * Bridgeport Near stations Bridgeport 26 Hall Sidewalks Yes High High Medium Traffic Minor Arterial High High Priority Low High * 27 Bonita Sidewalks&Bikeway No None No Low Major collector Medium Not in adapted Medium High Low plans 28 Carmen Sidewalks&Bikeway No None No Low Major collector Medium Not in adopted Medium High Low plans 30 OR-217 Multi-use Pathway Yes Medium High 217 Over highway High High Prio ConsHighability High High * Tualatin Projects Segment C 29 Lower 000105 Ferry&Boonesl Yes High High High High High Priority A 1 Medium High High Ferry Bikeway River&Traffic 1 *SWIM is defined as South West In Motion **Near Elmhurst&Bridgeport stations only.Remove remainder from further consideration ***Funding status as of July 2020.Station access project funding by local Jurisdictions is subject to change,check with project sponsor for latest information. Figure 3.13:Southwest Corridor Station Access Project Prioritization Matrix 45 3.8 Station Access Coordination The scope of the light rail project includes all transit infrastructure and integrated station access elements, like the Marquam Hill Connector and sidewalks and bike lanes on SW Barbur Blvd and SW 70th Ave.These integrated elements allow for efficient use of resources and well-coordinated designs that SOUTHWEST support mobility and land use goals. MOBILITY CORRIDOR In addition to integrated access projects,a variety of station access tools will OPTIONS be used to improve station access.These options will include projects and LIGHT RAIL services by other local jurisdictions. See Section 4.12 for more information on BY OTHERS how these tools are applied within the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project. PROJECT AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY LIGHT RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE - STATION ACCESS PROJECTS @ �- PARTNER PROJECTS ----H-r— �"' • Light rail system infrastructure and • Station access projects that were ,!, ;�I'.• • Projects are planned projects all the components associated advanced through the Shared i ; I`;, led entirely by jurisdictions,or 1� with the function,operation and - . Investment Strategy and are seeking , L. • other entities.These projects are 1- maintenance of the light rail ``' environmental clearance.These t 1 • ' • planned,funded,designed,and system. projects are funded by others . i '' constructed by others,and are .r and are not in the light rail project --, not part of the Southwest Corridor �� budget. - . � Light Rail Project. ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS "" • r We've heard from community • Selected projects to improve groups,these are important to access to and from the station STATION ACCESS local visions. Reference to these that will be constructed as part of projects are included for context the light rail project. PROJECTS only to inform station area SOUTHWEST FUTURE OPPORTUNITY:PUBLIC decisions. CORRIDOR ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS _ PROPERTIES FOR TRANSIT- PROJECTS • Example:Southwest in Motion •LIGHT RAIL • Street improvements, _ _ i.n;cmi:s id : ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (SWIM) pedestrian • Publicly-owned sites that could BY OTHERS intersections, and bike s •. ��„� PROJECT facilities,Park&Rides,stormwater ,~''-• provide transit-oriented development treatments,mobility elements,and - include:Barbur Transit Center,Tigard additional mitigations to address Park&Ride(at Pacific Highway), noise,traffic and environment. PUBLIC TOD Bridgeport Park&Ride. OPPORTUNITIES 4 DESIGN ELEMENTS 47 4 Design Elements PROJECT DESIGN GUIDANCE 4.1 Design Guidance O SAFE AND SECURE A great transit system is composed of a number of Design should emphasize Crime Prevention through Environmental Design(CPTED)principles of highly visible elements, each of which are distinct and have their places,lighting and natural surveillance in contributing toward safety and deterrence from crime. own function,and yet need to work together,as shown © COMFORTABLE AND CONVENIENT in Figure 4.1.This chapter describes these key project Design should create a comfortable environment across different weather conditions,seasonal events and times of day. elements, indicates where they are located and provides some precedent examples that explore how these © CONTEXTUAL elements could be expressed. Chapters 5-7 provide Design should be well-integrated with the social and physical nature of the community it serves--highlighting the further detail on how these elements work together at best qualities around each station while reflecting the culture and context of the surrounding streets,open spaces, each station area. buildings and neighborhood assets. The core project principles in Section 1.1: Project 0 CONNECTED AND ACCESSIBLE Purpose and Values have been extrapolated into design Design should make it simple and intuitive for riders to travel to and from the station. guidance to help create an attractive,functional light rail system that can positively influence the surrounding 0 PEOPLE-FIRST DESIGN area. Each of the guidance statements will shape a Design should enable station and streets to be comfortable and attractive places for people to be,not just travel design that integrates and meets all the identified through. principles. Urban design extends beyond the look and feel of the light rail system; it will impact the pattern of 0 HIGH-QUALITY DESIGN streets,open spaces and buildings that surround the Design should establish durable material choices,station elements and design strategies that can be implemented project. consistently across a variety of challenging contexts. 0 FLEXIBLE Design should be adaptable to new technologies, trends and conditions,and allow for elements of the system to evolve as the community evolves around it. 0 0 0 - O O i t i.. :: . . . :: 0 -- _ Fes. v e .•-; 4ilir :+A,p.,:m: { jj ' � a� .� - �I'yaw 4 ' :y '.��'' r'f� r1�y ■ r fir` ; ` ' 8 r ,ini IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR(ALL) 48 == f ------7--- ---= � =r - - �f- . -- A - . - - - ^�— -ter - - � - -- 4.7 Overhead Structures ill—r - 4.2 Stations and Platforms �' "�- '= _• - - --�"` _ _ z _, iirM chnimiNI.F , t; Creating Places at Stations _ f _ -1 r R J! .i=13 • i li • �► r_ames_ ' ,, Urban Design Elements- MI IMEM Mr •- 4.6 Walls " ,,, a' _ ti• b"17 a - "'—F `_ � aA� r e - � __ ; E� Stormwater Features i __,/ . am 0000ijOipri . 4.3 Alignment Design /� f; y t ;f �, AL �' - / 4 5 Operations Equipment and ilities __.---....,0-.._ ____ ..,. iiA. . ..,... r1 : , - - --- _ R — - Bike Facilities and Protected -- - � '_r _ ~ = 4"8 Intersections - . ' 4.9-Light Rail Intersections '� .J - lk ---. "= 4.4 Trackway Type -_ � =:firms• — , i _ _ � _ - , ,, 4.1 Station Access Toolkit Figure 4.1:Typical Design Elements within a Station Area(this illustration is not representative of any location along the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project) AN INTEGRATED PROJECT DESIGN ELEMENTS The following chapter describes the elements of Section CD Stations and Platforms Section 0 Bike Facilities and Protected Intersections the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project, as well as associated improvements. Section CD Alignment Design Section a Light Rail Intersections Section a Trackway Type Section a Stormwater Features Section • Operations Equipment and Facilities Section a Urban Design Elements Section • Walls Section a Station Access Toolkit Section 0 Overhead Structures Section a Creating Places at Stations 49 4.2 Stations and Platforms —� �,( 1 \ / �`_____--"Wed Line/BtueLine / \� MAX _ `i DOWNTOWN Station locations are influenced by land use,aiming to improve access / PORTLAND to key destinations and other modes of transportation,such as buses or Gibbs(shared transrtw�e bike facilities. Station design is also influenced by ridership projections, I including what mode of access people will use to get to the station.The 1 Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project will provide easy-to-use stations in BEAVERTON 'Hamilton � both in-street and off-street locations.The consistent use of system-wide 1 elements will be familiar to regular users. Each station will also include `\ unique elements to express its local context. 11 1 PLATFORM CONFIGURATIONS 1 _ Center Platform:Offers access to travel in both directions from a /13th ,F,,lf. single platform. 4/19th 'llx Side Platform:Offers access to only one travel direction per II platform. I' 30th j Split Side Platform:Offers access to only one travel direction per TIGARD Barbur Transit Center platform. Platforms located on opposite ends of an intersection. 53rd(off-street) / The platform will create a safe and easy-to-navigate experience from the 68th(off-street) SW PORTLAND i/ moment of arrival at the station. Placement of station elements, including ( ticketing machines,signage and amenities creates a clear path of travel to Hall(off-street) - Elmhurst and from the platform and minimizes disruptions to passenger flow. // / �i PLATFORM ZONES Entry Zone: Entry zone onto the platform varies between station locations; some may be accessed from a crosswalk while others are accessed from an `Bonita(elevated,off-street) adjacent plaza. Ticketing Zone:Ticketing zone provides both a place for riders to purchase TUALATIN Upper Boones Ferry(off-street) tickets,tap a Hopi'card or read transit information. Note:All station locations and aBridgeport Transit Center(off-street) platform types to be finalized in Boarding Zone:Consists of patron amenities that provide comfort and project development safety.Additional signage and transit information is provided. Figure 4.2:Platform Configuration Locations i 1_ 1 �� I��® � !r =s r- 1!— .,•••. 4Rl �, 'rte_. �. $� ENTRY CKETIN BOARDIN TICKETIN ENTRY ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE Figure 4.3:Typical Platform Zones with entries on both sides.Not all stations will have entries on both sides. 50 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT DESIRABLE CHARACTERISTICS TYPICAL CENTER PLATFORM All station platform configurations generally have the same layout of equipment and station elements. _ These elements will vary when the station is integrated - a Patron Amenities into a plaza,elevated above the roadway,etc. Shared -', -.--,4„...-_--[ i r::� ° Canopy characteristics of desirable station design include: -- .-- ;t�&..'"-. +„ „4.� real-time Arrival Information • Canopies provide weather protection for ticketing - - ., ~ ''` �' Station Identification Sign equipment and also provide weather protection for Windscreen 1 g Ticket Vending Machine and Hop'"Reader passengers Lighting ,- •=1 ,—__ -.e Transit Map and Information • Platform walkways are kept clear of obstructions Detectable -- A _ � and are designed to allow adequate room for Warning Strip -�-;�� ''� i ■ • passing through and queuing -`f��•- . I . '� ,, • Nearby destinations and transfer connections are Handrail f r� ® y �� '�. highly visible from the platform -,moi __ iir� • Wayfinding signage is located and spaced !! - II 4110i� consistently throughout the platform,with clear .- -j �. indication of which side patrons should wait to ' • •1 '-, �; board toward the desired direction -= • Stations are designed to be contemporary, minimal and consistent with other TriMet station infrastructure Figure 4.4.Center Platform Components Ei i r H Po m WHY CENTER PLATFORMS? The center platform offers access to travel in both directions from a single platform and requires only one set of equipment.This configuration is chosen to simplify transfers and allows a narrower footprint duePM to shared single platform width. Since the trackway is located on both sides of the platform,access to the station is limited to the platform ends. i, ',. Figure 4.5:Center Platform Components 51 TYPICAL SIDE PLATFORM Transit Map and Information WHY SIDE PLATFORMS? 101 . rrfii. + ....Patron Amenities '_. -�!�� . e Canopy The side platform offers access to only one travel ; � •�� `�::,� +�,,,�� —� '.404040—"'„ I Real-time Arrival Information direction per platform. It takes up a larger overall a�-....i iii:r_- -- --_-�-"L+� �� k' Station Identification Sign footprint compared to a center platform and requires _-!�2--+N; _ -_ - - ■ two sets of equipment.This configuration is chosen _::wP.� .4* _ �� --Ticket Vending Machine to distribute activity between two platforms and may Windscreen.. "'� 11111111.0 - and Hop""Reader allow back-of-platform access from an adjacent plaza Lighting - _1411114"""Ni Or Sidewalk. Detectable � � _ � ■ -. Warning Strip �... ��• Handrail io Figure 4.6:Side Platform Components io- WHY SPLIT-SIDE PLATFORMS? A variation of the typical side configuration is a split-side platform where platforms are located on opposite sides of an intersection. It is the least optimal _i_1 8 E configuration for transfers, but works well for center- running light rail trackways that require designing left-turn and u-turn lanes onto other streets.They also work well where station platforms straddle a roadway -- G -� - "...,1 -*NIL crossing, such as at Upper Boones Ferry Road Station. di ir - , - It , . f i mipa, - J i - - Figure 4.7:Side Platform Components 52 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 4.3 Alignment Design - MAX — t T2edLine/Blue Line DOWNTOWN The alignment is defined horizontally by where the track is placed along // •� J/PORTLAND the corridor,and vertically by the height/depth of structures. Safety is the highest priority and focus for the light rail alignment design. Other CROSS SECTIONS • Gibbs considerations respond to community,topographic,technical and 0 At-Grade Shared Transitway:North of Naito I construction challenges.The best alignment reflects a balanced response 0 At Grade Shared Transitway:South of Naito Hamilton I to these issues,while the design aims to minimize transitions across roadways,sidewalks and bike facilities in order to avoid conflicts between 0 At Grade Street Running:The Woods �\ different modes.An optimal alignment achieves passenger comfort and O At-Grade Street Running:Historic Barbur system service through higher operational speeds. I y g g p p © At Grade:SW 70th Ave(North) ( I 0 Above Grade:SW 70th Ave(South) RELATIONSHIP TO GRADE CO • �I At-Grade:Railroad Adjacent • �1x At-Grade:Track runs parallel to the grade of the street • 19th °1 ��i��l�� Above Grade:Track above street on an elevated structure or • 30th bridge • i Below Grade:Track below street in a underpass TIGARD 'i" Barbur Transit Center Below Grade— j (Pacific Hwy/99W crossing) /41m 53rd / RIGHT-OF-WAY TYPES A68th .1/ © SW PORTLAND — Shared Transitway:Trackway will be used jointly by express buses and light rail, minimizing congestion and improving travel O Elmhurst times and reliability Hall c""""" i �1 Street Running:Street running light rail is located within the public right-of-way,either in the center or along one side of the roadway Q Bonita Railroad Adjacent:Trackway runs alongside an existing railroad O tracks TUALATINUpper Boones Ferry Bridgeport Transit Center Figure 4.8:Types of Trackway Alignments ._.............vrit b ,•:•:: .. , . ......- . ._, • . . ...,. 1:;,±1 ," \ — ii[ ,', ire.~,, j y e FA AT-GRADE TRACK ABOVE GRADE TRACK BELOW GRADE TRACK IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR 53 r Iiit90,4 : - 711 ET5_ i2' ill a' _'ay `•- 40 , •� elk:. :s!, J, • • { + `.` y s� -� I�j I, 7 ! ~ * w1i sem' ., +ll i ■_ { n*IiIiI 'f C4 � � .E.i. -i ,�, - ON, _ . i r E : E 1 _ . - "" - ' ' ''' !W . )1 111 1' ....."-• t, IR ' . ---- -. -/e it ariii, SHARED TRANSITWAY STREET RUNNING RAILROAD ADJACENT IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CROSS-SECTIONS *all cross-sections are facing north,unless otherwise specified 0 AT-GRADE SHARED TRANSITWAY: NORTH OF -- NAITO ' r". The shared transitway for buses and light rail along �'. - SW Barbur Blvd allows for one lane of vehicular travel �`�„�� in both directions, as well as on-street bike facilities. L°,, Pedestrians are separated from the roadway by a . , — �� me I • ,' landscaped buffer. Due to the steep slope between [[ r Marquam Hill and the South Waterfront, retaining walls t E°` - li= � �I will be required. A (2°) \ 1 t k coo . Sidewalk Buffered Travel Shared Transitway Travel Buffered Sidewalk Bike Lane Lane Center-Running Light Rail Lane Bike Lane Emergency > Trackway < Emergency Access Access Figure 4.9:At-grade shared transitway north of Naito Parkway 0 AT-GRADE SHARED TRANSITWAY:SOUTH OF —.� NAITO Oil _ -,„, jillk A wider right-of-way south of the Barbur-Naito intersection allows for two lanes of vehicular travel in iii, ,,,,,, both directions, as well as raised protected bike lanes - - at the same level as the sidewalk.The wider right-of- t, r r a o s s a way also allows for more generous landscaped buffers s' — . = . between pedestrians, cyclists,and vehicles.The shared Gtia - coo transitway continues to allow buses to quickly move along SW Barbur Blvd while minimizing shared traffic Sidewalk Raised Travel Travel Shared Transitway/ Travel Travel Raised Sidewalk Protected Lane Lane Center-Running Light Rail Lane Lane Protected congestion with vehicles. Bike Lane Trackway Bike Lane Figure 4.10:At-grade shared transitway south of Naito Parkway 54 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT O AT-GRADE STREET RUNNING:THE WOODS The project will also rebuild two historic viaducts.A typical cross-section of a new viaduct is shown in Figure 4.11.The final design of these structures will Htm maximize the safety of people biking,walking,driving and taking transit,while minimizing impacts to theCL, Ainli ,� : ,a, natural areas within the Woods segment.A narrower s lin - — I/ 1-1 cross section in the woods and at the viaduct 1 coo structures is being studied to reduce tree impacts. \ / South of a new traffic signal at Rasmussen Village, Filint the trackway transitions from a shared transitway to a Raised Travel Travel Shared Transitway/Center Travel Travel Raised light rail only trackway. Sidewalk Protected Lane Lane Running Light Rail Trackway Lane Lane Protected Sidewalk Bike Lane Bike Lane Figure 4.11: At-grade center-running light rail trackway through the Woods segment at a viaduct location o AT-GRADE STREET RUNNING: HISTORIC -, zz/- Ali - BARBUR South of the Woods,the streetscape shares characteristics as the shared transitway south of the 101 Barbur-Naito intersection,with two lanes of vehicular ` Ell - ��h�, o IA �� Li a o ,r travel in both directions, as well as raised protected bike 'i IA �. ;. _ ma, lanes at the same level as the sidewalk.The streetscape t -11-A ends at Barbur Transit Center,where the trackway moves off the street transitioning to a light rail structure Sidewalk Raised Travel Travel Center-Running Light Rail Travel Travel Raised Sidewalk Protected Lane Lane Trackway Lane Lane Protected crossing of 1-5. Bike Lane Bike Lane Figure 4.12:At-grade center-running light rail trackway through Historic Barbur © AT-GRADE:SW 70TH AVE (NORTH) N,,,/.4-- v . The SW 70th Ave streetscape in the Tigard Triangle ` has a side-running at-grade light rail trackway with a 000 A right-of-way width to allow for sidewalks on both sides 111111 of the street.The streetscape consists of two lanes I ovisoie Aro 11 t t \LA of vehicular travel,shared between cyclists and motor 71-),_ 1/17-\1 I vI , ,. - - vehicles. l t Sidewalk Sharrow/ Sharrow/ Side-Running Light Rail Travel Lane Travel Lane Trackway Figure 4.13:At-grade side-running light rail trackway through SW 70th Ave 55 0 ABOVE GRADE: SW 70TH AVE(SOUTH) SW 70th Ave in the Tigard Triangle has a side-running light rail trackway that is elevated to avoid an at-grade crossing at SW Dartmouth St,which is a primary I I east-west arterial access between 1-5 and SW Pacific in rHwy/99W.The remainder of the streetscape consistsof two lanes of vehicular travel,shared between viy'.., cyclists and vehicles.The topography within the Tigard 1 I� II-11 I =MI Triangle requires retaining walls that allow for the c,- 0 a ,,-.; ANAL, terracing of the trackway,the streetscape and adjacent I. ! °1 parcels above and below the streetscape. As a result, a sidewalk is located only on the west side of SW 70th Ave between SW Dartmouth St and SW Elmhurst St. Sidewalk Sharrow/ Sharrow/ Side-Running Elevated Light Rail Travel Lane Travel Lane Trackway Figure 4.14:Above-grade side-running light rail trackway through SW 70th Ave 0 AT-GRADE: RAILROAD ADJACENT Southwest of the Hall Boulevard Station,the light rail trackway runs through the Tigard Employment Corridor, paralleling the WES Commuter Rail and Union Pacific freight rail rights-of-way to the west,with office / \ \ Lojdevelopment and industry to the east. Segments north - and south of SW Bonita Rd will be elevated to avoid — illilli r •-\ 0.".C, oeoo.o at-grade conflicts with existing rail rights-of-way.The ______ n�� _ �� existing pedestrian crossing will remain at Bonita Road Railroad Right of Way Railroad Adjacent for access to the Bonita Road Station. A new pedestrian Light Rail Trackway crossing will be located where the existing freight and 441.-- new new light rail tracks and SW 72nd Ave intersect,just ,�, 4 north of SW Kable Ln.To access the Upper Boones Ferry Station,existing pedestrian crossings at SW 72nd Figure 4.15:At-grade light rail trackway adjacent to existing railroad right-of-way Ave and SW Sequoia Pkwy will be used. 56 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT SHARED TRANSITWAY LEGEND /1 Downtown A 1.6 mile segment of paved trackway,called the =OmSouthwest Corridor Light Rail Interstate Portland shared transitway is planned into and out of downtown 405 Portland.This feature accommodates both bus and Portal of Shared Transitway Northern Portal of Shared Transitway e ,..■■■.. .•• \ao, NOT TO SCALE light rail operations and provides bus routes with access (signalized entry/exit) a<g� i► to dedicated transit lanes and a faster transit trip in Shared Transitway �aQ° congested areas.The shared transitway projects nearly (Southwest Corridor Light Rail (ID Express Bus Lines 7,600 daily trips to and from Gibbs Street Station on and express bus lines) s+ Goc bus lines 44 and 56. Operating speeds within the shared Local Bus Lines 3etransitway are currently assumed at 35 mph. Connected (in travel lanes) a vehicle studies are in progress to explore current7. NOTE:This diagram reflects the bus lines li; z technologies required to meet these assumptions. As on SW Barbur Blvd and in the shared an example,the MAX Orange Line includes a 1.3-mile ' transitway and does not represent all bus t.,_, shared transitway,which provides access for the bus lines captured within the map frame. GIbbS •. lines 17 and 9 and the Portland Streetcar approaching }r• . - -� Local Bus Lines and on the Tilikum Crossing bridge. r rai, At Gibbs Street Station,a split center platform serves light' el r rail and bus lines 44 and 56 using the shared transitway LIGHT RAIL FREQUENCY for an express trip into downtown Portland Light rail service frequencies are expected to range from 7.5 to 15 minutes in 2035,depending on the location Homestead along alignment and the time of day. See Figure 4.16 for estimated travel time between stations. Hamilton s : Express Bus Lines • At Hamilton Street Station,a center platform serves light rail only.Bus lines 44 and 56 using the shared transitway 1 Local Bus Lines are express and do not stop at Hamilton Street Station. ti . l a •• Local buses(54,96 use bus stops in travel lanes) Y` ' ' - ■.., ■• Southern Portal of Shared Transitway },� � r. - I:' . rT-. •- 1/ A �f.K._ f 1.. - - j , l . r TT I. • • , ,41'' , _ I -I South �•' lei. ! Waterfront P., - . + Ili_kJ '.i�'+ Hillsdale Local Bus Lines . L NOTE:About a year prior to beginning 1 _ Southwest Corridor Light Rail service, r . - - -_ SW process Hwy TriMet process tll o engage thesesrs in a public assumptions - _r- ` Local Bus Lines and confirm a bus service plan that SOUTH WATERFRONT/TILIKUM SHARED TRANSITWAY serves future needs while minimizing IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR service duplication. SWC Light Rail n 57 ESTIMATED STATION TO STATION LIGHT RAIL TRAVEL TIME (MINUTES) Northbound Station SW College Gibbs Hamilton 13th 19th 30th Barbur 53rd 68th Elmhurst Hall Bonita UBF Bridgeport SW Jackson 2.8 4.5 9.0 10.6 12.4 14.4 16.9 18.5 21.1 22.9 25.5 27.1 29.5 Gibbs 2.8 1.6 6.2 7.8 9.5 11.5 14.1 15.7 18.3 20.1 22.7 24.3 26.7 Hamilton 4.5 1.6 6.1 7.9 9.9 12.4 14.1 16.6 18.5 21.0 22.6 25.0 13th 9.0 6.2 4.5 I 1.6 3.3 _. , . 9.5 12.1 13.9 16.5 18.1 20.5 19th 10.6 7.8 6.1 1.6 1.8 3.8 6.3 7.9 10.5 12.3 14.9 16.5 18.9 -0 30th 12.4 9.5 7.9 3.3 i.8 2.0 4.6 6.2 8.8 10.6 13.1 14.8 17.1 0 Barbur 14.4 11.5 9.9 5.4 3.8 2.0 2 F 4.2 6.7 8.6 11.1 12.7 15.1 I� 53rd 16.9 14.1 12.4 7.9 6.3 4.6 2.5 1.6 4.2 6.0 8.6 10.2 12.6 NL 68th 18.5 15.7 14.1 9.5 7.9 6.2 4.2 1 1.6 2.6 4.4 7.0 1111 8.6 10.9 Elmhurst 21.1 18.3 16.6 12.1 10.5 8.8 6.7 4.2 1 2.6 1.8 4.4 6.0 8.4 Hall 22.9 20.1 18.5 13.9 12.3 10.6 8.6 6.0 4A 1.8 2.6 4.2 6.6 Bonita 25.5 22.7 21.0 16.5 14.9 13.1 11.1 8.6 7.0 4.4 2.6 1.6 4.0 UBF 27.1 24.3 22.6 18.1 16.5 14.8 12.7 10.2 1 8.6 6.0 4.2 1.6 2.4 Bridgeport 29.5 26.7 25.0 I 20.5 1 18.9 17.1 15.1 12.6 1 10.9 8.4 6.6 4.0 L. , FM- Figure 4.16:Estimated Station to Station Light Rail Travel Time(Minutes) Notes: (1)UBF is abbreviated for Upper Boones Ferry (2)Estimated travel times shown are based on preliminary modeling variables for informational purposes only.Travel time is subject to refinement throughout project development and final engineering. 58 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 4.4 Trackway Type —. MAX _—-- \ � �` _--- Red Line%Blue Line DOWNTOWN As the alignment travels through various contexts,over guideway support / J,PORT.LAND structures and into shared street environments,the trackway will change in response to the various needs required by each of these conditions. • Gibbs Ballasted track will be the most common type of track, as it is the most i appropriate method for exclusive rail alignments. Direct embedded track BEAVERTON • Hamilton I will be used on the shared transitway and at intersections where vehicles and people walking and bicycling require a flat surface to be able to cross \ the rail lines. Direct fixation will be used on overhead structures and tunnels I where there will not be any interaction with other modes of circulation. II Figure 4.18 illustrates the various trackway fixation types. 1 • �In TRACKWAY TYPES • 19th ml Embedded:Track embedded into a concrete slab at roadway • II crossings and through the shared transitway • 30th I Barbur Transit Center Ballasted:Track attaches to concrete ties embedded in a coarse TIGARD i aggregate where the rail line is an exclusive light rail use • 3rd % Direct Fixation:Track attaches to raised concrete bars integral to • 68th its support structure. Used in tunnels and on elevated structures SW PORTLAND • Elmhurst \\ Hal • I • Bonita TUALATIN • Upper Boones Ferry • Bridgeport Transit Center \ Figure 4.17:Trackway Type Locations 59 TRACKWAY TYPES EMBEDDED 1 BALLASTED DIRECT FIXATION , -- - _ .71.111141/4_,. - .ir 1 _...... .._. . _. . ...._ ______ . ... -__________ ...... .. .. ,.., . . _ .... , . . -_____ . ,•44 • II* •''ll!"11111%."4414 r '—'' 'ir-rir..4 i •' V ^';',..., ' lqg -�- ,rte .-47 ,-4-dUr..;1- .- 7--. ....4. .. . , . . • ,T, - 4,,.... . .... 1,... . ••. ,. _...___ ..... EMBEDDED TRACK DETAIL BALLASTED TRACK DETAIL DIRECT FIXATION TRACK DETAIL IMAGE SOURCE:ZGF IMAGE SOURCE:ZGF IMAGE SOURCE:MTA CONSTRUCTION&DEVELOPMENT FLICKR le .., 11 iiL,.; : 0 i i 1.1141141111=1Pri ____ =_—_-_,.: iI{I "9411:11_ �� _ A + #1.1 rillir ' . --- -* . , 1.!. _ .. ` ,.1 SII _ : . �.�,�@Hfi iY,r..Y. r d illigl- — - . •-_-_j_ - --;111141111. . iikuum wrti ! Y. • r � 1. Jiallilli S _ ww EMBEDDED TRACK ON SHARED TRANSITWAY BALLASTED TRACK AT DEDICATED LIGHT RAIL STATION DIRECT FIXATION TRACK THROUGH TUNNEL IMAGE SOURCE:ZGF IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR IMAGE SOURCE:ZGF Figure 4.18:Reference images of the three trackway fixation types which will be used throughout the corridor based on context and anticipated use of the light rail right-of-way. 60 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 4.5 Operations Equipment and Facilities MAX _— � � _ — \ � —7FedLine%BluLin ee . DO,WNTOWN The transit system is supported by operations equipment with signal, �' — f �; ,P-ORTLAND communication and powering functions.The most frequent and visible �*Gibbs ` elements are the Overhead Catenary System (OCS) poles that carry ` overhead wires supplying power to the light rail vehicles. Poles are I located along the entire alignment and typically in the center of the BEAVERTON • Hamilton I trackway,except when there are limitations in right-of-way width, or other considerations such as bus operations. OCS poles come in a variety of \ types, sizes and finishes to fit within their context. Some OCS poles also \1 include overhead street lighting. Figure 4.20 includes OCS pole types. 1 An Operations and Maintenance Facility in Tigard,accessed by light rail 13th �I n from a third trackway at Hall Street Station and by vehicles from SW • =ax Hunziker St,will be used for train cleaning,storage and repair.The facility ♦ 19th ,-°► • serves as a base for crews cleaning and maintaining stations, Park& Rides, • 30th Transit Centers,trackway, signals,communications and overhead power, and is a reporting headquarters for train operators.There will also be • Barbur Transit Center I p g q p TIGARD I numerous smaller systems buildings along the alignment containing signal, communications,or power equipment,or a combination thereof. While their " ' 53rd i primary function is utility,systems buildings can be designed and located •> ; i in a way that contributes positively to the station area environment through 68th SW PORTLAND high-quality facade treatments, landscape screening and attractive fencing. `\ Images of these design treatments are shown in Figure 4.20. Hall •O Elmhurst \ i I •l 4•"":-.1'-'',- - „ _ — Bonita rj ' �� TUALATIN •• Upper Boones Ferry — .. Bridgeport Transit Center �� • Figure 4.19:Operations Facilities Locations —, --,—,-- „.--1,%" 10 —_ ' ; '*' OPERATIONS FACILITIES -.:ti .: ti • Systems Buildings:Structures that house power distribution and -. . 6 communication functions for the light rail system r, ♦ Operations and Maintenance Facility(OMF):Structure and rail l.7e:_ r-:c .5 yard for operational activities and maintenance of light rail vehicles r Overhead Catenary System(OCS):A support system that RUBY JUNCTION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY(TRIMET) supplies the light rail vehicle with electricity-located system-wide 61 OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES DESIGN o plop- 7.: i1TH,,.i, „„+ l. 0l4,,iiemP,4ea.)I.I..rIII _.._._.,.7.• ..1,_, i-.._.i_._f_.,._._,. '‘- '-'''k' arCt \''-5-..,-,4i-,k.,...!- 1 k—.r'_I1..t1_1.11.-4.$;1—•,.—I.—:,4•14-It:'-.—.. -.4b44_,M_.I,,.a,l...,. :,''1.4•i1'-..', 1..,1_,1.l,i i,-. •.-..• id„,. , ”,1.'1EM'l - I`j`�_..,_-,.._.iik-.• ;Ia .r'+��' '"'.� — S—' • 11ir s.,i1.:-,.i..".'. , . '$ski T.i!, ;I.r.—,...._-i` i,a•1_—p...i•, „v .i._,._. -,t1', ,.11 .-_. 1 fCS .. . .,_, 11111 . - . IIII, INDUSTRIAL OCS POLE-GENERAL AREAS ROUND OCS POLE- HIGH VISIBILITY AREAS OCS INTEGRATED WITH LIGHTING-URBAN AREAS IMAGE SOURCE:ZGF IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR IMAGE SOURCE:ZGF I IEF.. .11 ILL. ''' '. "W lur— . }}nn. as '� Pr 44 on 11T. ,vApit •„It tr 10 •; 'Y,-• 1. 4 Vii--,..)1,fer - a� , Of ilk in }. . - '4 . I .�.Aftlitg 1 -, — X11 SYSTEMS BUILDING WITH METAL SCREEN SYSTEMS BUILDING WITH MURAL SYSTEMS BUILDING WITH MURAL IMAGE SOURCE:ZGF IMAGE SOURCE:VIA ARCHITECTURE IMAGE SOURCE:KENJI HAMAI STOLL Figure 4.20:OCS poles and systems buildings may have a standardized appearance,or a higher quality design finish depending on context and visibility 62 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT I , 4.6 Walls 1 1 The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project travels through areas with 1 ‘I\dynamic topography. Large structural walls will be required in many 1 locations along the route.These walls will use various design treatments I • Gibbs which respond to the surrounding urban environment, neighborhood or natural context. Figure 4.21 identifies the locations of these walls, and a BEAVERTON 1 a Hamilton visual glossary of these design tools is illustrated in Figure 4.22.These i design treatments visually reduce the overall mass of the wall,create visual interest, include top of wall treatments to define clear horizontal lines, 9 and incorporate protective barriers and guardrails into the design. Design treatments are chosen based on available space and location context. :�, i Height, length and configuration of all proposed walls will be finalized in F if final engineering. al 4'4�, + •13th ,19th to .'4130th WALL TYPES ' i ''�- TIGARO i Barbur Transit Center �v I \ 1111111 Cut Site Wall:A cut site wall is created when % - �'; rd a wall is cut into the hillside,requiring the Bth PORTLAND removal of soil. I i 11 L Multnomah Hall fl�hharst• Gackamas - ____ —-_ __ / I I Fill Site Wall:A fill site wall is created when extra soil is needed to fill behind a wall that • Bonita creates a vertical (or near-vertical)elevation that would require a protective rail. TUALATIN • Upper Boones Ferry • Bridgeport Transit Center Figure 4.21:Significant Wall Locations and Type 63 WALL DESIGN TOOLKIT BASE OF WALL FACE OF WALL TOP OF WALL •-71 rii„, �y� . • . . .r.4;.: ..;,-.1.5%.%itortr,; o'q' R� ; i ; .t_-mow .�. .. + •. alar!. , II I �• e24,1,1 ..04, -- ;...:-./:•::. 4----- '�., -- , _ 11 --.;,,,..'4';,111..... L ) Jilin �Zi � "117 .:-• —� - _„ • riti, l � TREE AND PLANTING SCREEN WALL WITH PATTERN RELIEF GALVANIZED GUARDRAIL WITH UNIFORM PATTERN IMAGE SOURCE:GOOGLEEARTH IMAGE SOURCE:ZGF IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR +ifrr' 7.-,; �I d. ! T"'fN .T II •, .',, .-` • Max • c.a. 000kll f�� I� �Il :71A�� 1:71—... • •,....._�� ..i. GABION WALL LARGE PANEL TEXTURED WALL GALVANIZED GUARDRAIL WITH NATURAL PATTERN IMAGE SOURCE:MAYER/REED IMAGE SOURCE:PETER EHRLICH IMAGE SOURCE:DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES ar „ moi::I ■ s i. 7-.F. �•- r • .�- .. - • -sir' J ilho, I •.. }.i4,` B i • efi [ .s-r •! ryf , 171 n► AOF Mimi II 11 PLACEMAKING AND IDENTITY TEXTURED WALL PATTERNS CONCRETE WALL CAP AND PAINTED GUARDRAIL IMAGE SOURCE:ZACH YARRINGTON IMAGE SOURCE:MAYER/REED IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR Figure 4.22:Visual impact of walls can be mitigated by base modulations such as battering and terracing,surface treatments and textures on the face of wall,and top of wall finish by guardrails or caps. 64 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 4.7 Overhead Structures - /-.....ii \ _ -- Re�Llne%MAX ' Blue Line k. j Overhead structures are necessary to cross barriers, maximize safety, �/ ' 1 405 Br+ ge, \—/ N maintain travel time and avoid or minimize impacts to sensitive NGibbs ` environmental areas.The appearance of overhead structures will be Marquam Hill Connector designed to fit within their context.All structures will be built to modern-day j code and specification, including seismic provisions. BEAVERTON Hamilton There are four primary types of context for overhead structures along the \ Capitol Hwy Bridge sib Newbury Viaduct a Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project: Over freeways and major arterials using typical design standards;urban areas or areas highly visible from the I 11 public realm warranting attention to design detail; natural areas around the II Vermont Viaduct I two viaduct replacements on SW Barbur Blvd in the Woods and the Red al Rock Creek watershed within the Tigard Triangle;and an elevated station at 13th -1\X 9 9 Multnomah Bridge r Bonita. Images of potential design treatments of these areas are illustrated 26th Bridge • 19th l in Figure 4.24.As shown,some structures travel through a variety ofjo,- 30th environments and will respond to their changing context.Treatments will 1-5 Bridge I be refined over the course of project development and final engineering. TIGARD ♦ Barbur Transit Center 1-5 Bridge i LIGHT RAIL STRUCTURES 53rd t 68th SW PORTLAND ,l ■ Roadway or Rail Bridges:Standard structures that allow the track ■ Red Rock Creek Bridge l to cross over a roadway,waterway or other rail tracks Dartmouth BridgeI ■ Urban Bridges:Structures in urban areas or highly visible Hall�� 4 Elmhurst ` Hwy 217 Bridge z locations from the public realm which could warrant greater Red Rock Creek (Designed for potential integration design detail Structure with Multi-Use Path) ■ Elevated Stations:Stations elevated above grade, primarily to Bonita Bridge avoid at-grade roadway crossings at the station kBonita ■ Natural Area Bridges:The project will replace the existing Newbury and Vermont Viaduct structures in the Woods,and add a TUALATIN Upper Boones Ferry structure over the Red Rock Creek in the Tigard Triangle Union Pacific Railroad Bridge OTHER STRUCTURESV �C Bridgeport Transit Center v * Pedestrian Bridge: Pedestrian-only walkways Figure 4.23:Overhead Structures Locations 65 OVERHEAD STRUCTURES DESIGN TOOLKIT ._.. ...7,H 1111111 H---n=i -- "' ' STANDARD DESIGN ELEVATED STATION iCi ., ,, 1 _______ . . „,,„„._ .: -.Jig,. , .,• : !,,,„.„, 116 ..... ..., 4,,,. ,.., _., 11... err - I]_L7 1.I f f 1- ..... .L_��1L� ...., ,,..7,1...i.,, ...„,....., ___ . • "11111/INgsmir .. i1444 } �, �l .. ^rift` j�rws*� _. ._ • . . �k...,.. _•`. I ,► [•. `F , , , —J7. 117-, . . .' �_ :.` -' IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR IMAGE SOURCE:ZGF IMAGE SOURCE:ZGF IMAGE SOURCE:VIA ARCHITECTURE TYPICAL CONCRETE COLUMNS AND GUIDEWAY STRUCTURE GUIDEWAY INTEGRATED INTO ELEVATED STATION DESIGN URBAN BRIDGES(HIGHLY VISIBLE FROM PUBLIC REALM) NATURAL AREAS if :. _ .k-' r 1 . • .... .. • —- • . Ya+r°.`...� , I' r. �_ :0111111J am'" '—'`I `i''4 y i•..F.:is l "►:t:- `t --,Ney--i ., i.. N 'iKvw. �. I; . ;,_• o ligi:.=,'I;I'Ili[il • 111' C - ti`0, ;a �� IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET IMAGE SOURCE:PORTLAND TRIBUNE STEEL STRUCTURE OR INTEGRATED PLACEMAKING SPANNING WATERBODIES AND OPEN SPACE Figure 4.24:Depending on context,overhead structures can have a standard appearance,integrate into station architecture,have distinctive features in urban areas,or more reserved character in natural areas. 66 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 4.8 Bike Facilities and Protected Intersections - MAX ��te�taneleiueTine DOWNTOWN The project will add over six miles to the region's system of bike facilities, / PORTLAND bike crossings and neighborhood greenways, particularly where streets are rebuilt to accommodate street running lightright-of-way.rail within the ri ht-of-wa . • Gibbs Within Portland,a continuous separated bicycle connection from Barbur j Transit Center to Downtown Portland will allow cyclists of all ages and BEAVERTON •.Hamilton I abilities to safely and comfortably access destinations along the corridor. j The project will continue to explore and coordinate options for bike facilities along SW Barbur Blvd, north of SW Naito Parkway intersection. - a Alm r SHARED STREETS IN TIGARD °1 1 In Tigard,the SW 70th Ave shared street in the Tigard Triangle will provide • 13th .. 11 SW Naitd a safe and pleasant walking and cycling route from the station to emerging • 19th •'•.Pkwy 11 development north of SW Dartmouth Street. It will be the first segment of • • 1 Tigard's vision to make SW 70th Ave a key north-south walking and biking 30th • •• • 1 route linking the station with Red Rock Creek, development in the center of • O• the Tigard Triangle and regional trails to the south. TIGARD •— Barbur Transit Center I Existing pedestrian I i 1 • + r' _ 53rd bridge at BTC to remain SW Bancroft St Q IIII `• °� • SW Hamilton St Q• t 4' A , •- • SW PORTLAND i 68th • v. i � ;I_ • Elmhurst O� \\\ "I:,+� ' c�= " Hall • • I SHARED STREETS • IMAGE SOURCE:CYCLE TORONTO,ARCGIS.COM • • BIKE FACILITY TYPES ALONG ALIGNMENT • Bonita • Shared Streets: Designates a safe and visible place for cyclists to SW TerwilligerSWA 2nde ride where they share a low traffic volume roadway with cars TUALATIN • Upper Boones ferry Blvd • SW Bertha Blvd ° ° O• O Buffered Bike Lanes:Striped cyclist-only lanes that create at- grade separation between cyclists and automobiles • Bridgeport TCansit Center SW 19th Ave • SW 3rd Y Ave Raised Protected Bike Lanes(RPBL): Bicycle facility that Figure 4.25:Bike Facility Locations :SW Multnomah Blvd o� provides comfort and safety by putting a curb-separated bufferIR5.41 between traffic and cyclists SW 30th av ° SW Spring Garden St • SIGNALIZED PROTECTED INTERSECTION TREATMENTS(See Figure 4.21) SWPri;nroseSt SWAliccSt O SW 26th Way OTarget Locations for Type 1 (existing or planned bike facility on SW Baird St (34) minor street) S Taylors O OO Target Locations for Type 2 or 3(all other intersections) Ferry Rd 67 RAISED PROTECTED BIKE LANES IN PORTLAND •Raised Protected Bike Lanes (RPBLs) provide a '' f,+. comfortable and safe bicycling environment. People _ i i biking are separated from automobiles by a curb- r✓ +, protected furnishing zone.Along SW Barbur Blvd,this zone will include planting, street trees, lights and utility " P g, 9 _,�.; � , 1 . poles. People biking will ride on each side of the street - - - a in the same direction as traffic,adjacent to the sidewalk a i- _ - r I% , , -and with a separation treatment as appropriate to :;, ; ;;i -Ibi,i r , address narrower space on the street. Coordination - 5 {r • I - -• FI between site furnishings and bus shelter locations in ,_-..,_.._ __ � ; - :III' N -"�`-ter -� ,�,� .-_. _.- - �,:....- �. �� I RIS - - -i - ^ relationship with bike facilities to be explored in final I , ,n i — -.s _ .rte,_ L design. I , The project will construct over four miles of RPBLs between SW Naito Pkwy and Barbur Transit Center, providing a seamless and continuous connection — ' through Southwest Portland that serves a number of neighborhoods along the corridor. PRECEDENT OF RAISED PROTECTED BIKE LANE(BOND ST) IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET Ale a A v . v. r r I -0--o( ) 75-0( )675 MEM MMK 00 0 00 00 0 00 0, 4 ((,. t oi -' 1 I 1 t CPD 8'sidewalk 8'RPBL 5'landscape 5'I landscape 8'RPBL 8'sidewalk 21' 21' 114'minimum(often wider due to stations,turn lanes,etc.) Figure 4.26:Typical cross-section of raised protected bike lanes on SW Barbur Blvd 68 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT PROTECTED INTERSECTIONS PROTECTED INTERSECTION TYPES Protected intersections protect both people walking and biking from traffic. Protected intersections that Type 1 design requires O Type 2 design is more compact are signalized may have right, left and/or though ® adequate space at the — and may be applied in locations movements for all modes. In addition to being protected intersection corners and is i w where space is limited.This from right-turning vehicles,cyclists also have a designed to connect to bike type may be employed where protected place to make a two-stage left turn without III facilities on minor streets. the minor streets are narrower merging into traffic. In some locations, right-turning I I /® and do not include bike vehicles may have a red light while people walking The diagram on the left is a 4 facilities. and biking cross the intersections. Lead interval 6conceptual design for how TYPE 2 signal timing will be explored at protected intersection O a Type 1 design may be locations. Pedestrians also benefit from protected intersections because they reduce the overall roadway applied at the intersection of SW Terwilliger Blvd and crossing distance. C 0 Similarly compact as Type SW Barbur Blvd,while the 2,Type 3 design provides a There are several types of intersection designs for images below illustrate a / mixing zone for bicyclists and constructed application protected intersections that will be applied along the MIXING ZONE pedestrians to briefly share as corridor.A full protected intersection (Type 1) provides of the Type 1 intersection ® they wait to cross, as opposed dseparation and protection for people walking and biking li 0 Vancounver, ver,conBC. in to separation. in every direction.This design also requires additional Vancouver, BC. right-of-way space that will not be available at every ' intersection.Type 2 and Type 3 will be applied along the Figure 4.27:Protected intersection types corridor as appropriate to address narrower roadways. '1 i�lia! The following criteria are used to determine the best ' �� ; r `� n design solution at each intersection: I 1 , !lk ik ,- +7..1 • Demand ki . r;� - Additional space '.1, – I l i" • ADA standards • Traffic volumes ", w " ax:: i; t'�'RI. 'i --- Re - r 1 • Existing bike facilities . — =- ':r� �i 4 :� 9 Turningmovements _- :��. _ - H ,o, • Planned bike facilities . Topography pg y..: : - �.6'-* '11• f MAT _ - - kr k LJ � l --•% �r lik.__ _.Ilk - .4., ''-.-:7 , EXAMPLE OF TYPE 1 INTERSECTION IMAGE SOURCE:DALE BRACEWELL 69 - \i4.9 Light Rail Intersections MX�7eBne%BueLne — , , DOWNTOWN, _-- Light rail will affect the pattern of circulation for all modes of / 1 PORTLAND transportation, and the project will modify traffic flow to improve safety O \ through enhancements to existing intersections. Project partners are Gibbbsbs collaborating to apply new design tools that will improve circulation and I I access along the corridor. All intersections will prioritize pedestrian and BEAVERTON •O amilton � cyclist safety first. 1 New pedestrian crossings along the project alignment will create 1 more regular spacing for a more pedestrian-oriented environment with 11 connections to desired locations. Continue reading the"Pedestrian o Permeability"section for a sample of how additional crossings improve OO Ila pedestrian permeability,specifically along SW Barbur Blvd. g-►" 19th • col INTERSECTION TYPES O 30th 11 OI Station Intersections: Intersections that contain a light rail station Barbur Transit Center I and prioritize movement to and from the station.(Note:Upper -11G/ RD l Boones Ferry Road Station also intersects with dedicated light rail) j 00• Pedestrian-Only Crossings: Pedestrian-only crossings provide •68th • 53rd • SW PORTLAND • i / opportunities to cross on longer blocks 0 / OO Locations where intersections cross center-running light rail O `\ Hall O Elmhurst • O• Locations where a cross street intersects with dedicated side- •o • I running light rail • • i- - _f I Back of Platform Crossing • Zebra Crosswalk r. . • _ g`I r j r 4{"`a' ;It — • Bonita • r ' AL/ ..-: 4' ! r ri °'4'4 AI .•• —Pod " J Upper Boones Ferry SW Terwilliger Blvd y : 1 - Potential Planted Median - SW Bertha Blvd Left Turn Lanes - I $_J_ _i r f :1!. o y ' J� Y • y `� � . , TUALATIN Bridgeport TransitCenter SW 19th Ave o / �_ F -.11:' i� t—° i1 Figure 4.28:Light Rail Intersection Locations SW Multnomah • • r.F ill I Blvd Q .. '. ' /0� SW Spring Garden St Striped Crosswalk Median Refuge 0 i 1 k r r- ' y t, {LI f; - t r+, y SW Primrose St 0 0 SW 26th Way Traffic Signal J',, + � : / ,'',.,y ti SW Alia St p d r 1 SW BairdSt OS SW 30th Ave 'FJ110 '-,r. . , Al. i 0 00 II , , y - LIGHT RAIL STATION INTERSECTION (SE 17TH AVE&RHINE ST) 70 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT • v,c• s1 7'• Potential Planted Median • ip••...:...„ ri _ ..„,, . .010,,,„ . , Left Turn Lanes _r. �. y, b-,_ . /+ 4( NW Left Turn Lanes • _ i 7 Paved Crosswalk • �' • r - ` . .. j 111:.'-'1111111:Pi al- iirw—l': . III .70-001 - _ . _F Traffic Signal ,--.••: if/,''' t ------N.1 —.' it ` _ . {". .. Striped Crosswalk ; . 41/2'11.1f:it a. \b. '... . fi _• �ti 1, i r w S N. `� fly , (il .t 9 /1,, SIDE-RUNNING LIGHT RAIL INTERSECTION (NE HOLLADAY ST&NE 7TH AVE) CENTER-RUNNING LIGHT RAIL INTERSECTION (SE 17TH AVE) • ;^,�%.-. J `"` .i- Signal I and Gate � 1 +'t�� g I 3C� • ••,-<..-\t. ! ---------7----:•_-----•-•A\-' yi :w�` '•� x k, • �t ... 'Median Refuge with Railing . \tV 7.- ' ' __.4-1'-,i •-*•• . .a,. , \ri It...... ' ° .c � e",► -, ty i `Zebra Crosswalk / ,1 IiN\ ti 1.- '! ' • I � Q ,Q 'r A 1` IL` � \ \ I.: s< _ Planted Median .:... P. 9, _ „' L'irrtiE I' p fit ' _ —r 'I�1 + Ort * l _,.. — "§£ \�• NO\ ...ok = _ . ••-. . _/, \ \V\ i• -IAL L'''' ' ,A...‘KOF...4 _ _ Ry• - it ti ' ' k - - .,\ SHARED LIGHT RAIL-RAILROAD INTERSECTION (DOWNTOWN MILWAUKIE) PEDESTRIAN-ONLY CROSSING (SE 17TH AVE&RHINE ST) 71 PEDESTRIAN PERMEABILITY LEGEND A major benefit of the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project is the increased pedestrian permeability across Southwest Corridor Light Rail SW Barbur Blvd,making the crossing locations throughout the corridor and large arterials as safe and n Pedestrian District comfortable as possible,while maintaining light rail operations and vehicular traffic.With guidance from Traffic Signal(Vehicular Intersection) PedPDX,Portland's citywide pedestrian plan,the project increases the overall permeability of SW Barbur Enhanced Pedestrian Crossing(Full Crosswalk) Blvd through additional marked crossings.The design of crossing frequencies strives to meet a 530'desired spacing within designated pedestrian districts and a 800'desired spacing outside of pedestrian districts. Enhanced Pedestrian Crossing(Half Crosswalk toPlatform) These additional pedestrian crossings also benefit bicyclists,by providing improved circulation and crossing 1500'1Spacing between Marked Crossings(feet) opportunities. Figure 4.29 below illustrates a sample of these improvements. EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS WITH TRAFFIC SIGNAL OR FLASHING BEACON (RRFB) Terwilliger .r x~43 { f •....�,:�.. .y �. Bertha 13th 19th ' 2, 30th Alice .... . ' 41 ....: ..3-e: cfr. ., _ O -,. •- 4—,` .. 750' 1150' 1800' 1550' 1900' 800' 2000' 650' PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS Terwilliger L _ _ _. Bertha Custer 13th 19th 22nd 24th 30th Alice 35th Baird BTC e 41st • I 750' 700' 450' 850' 600' 450' 300600' 600' 600' 750' 400' 400' 700' 450' 500' 900' 300' 400' Figure 4.29:Sample-pedestrian permeability along SW Barbur Blvd 72 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 4.10 Stormwater Features STORMWATER TOOLKIT Managing stormwater locally and on-site helps clean pollution from stormwater and protect u _ -_ — - rivers,streams and oceans.The varied geology and topography of the Southwest Corridor and l ; i., +� ,-.''` differences in the existingwastewater infrastructure treatment system dictate the various tools t , ° • ."�� • = and approaches that must be used to capture and clean stormwater in the corridor.The four •• _ �" ' _ 6 generalized land conditions(Figure 4.30)along the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project show that :...ti44r- :5 different stormwater solutions will be needed to mitigate runoff and integrate it into existing spaces. - ,.•,.!r!-_,..,.,--7':,'4 1.- Figure 4.31 show an array of tools and facilities,such as bioswales,stormwater planters, andi _., ,c,,, . - - . N rain gardens that can be used to collect stormwater and runoff from surrounding surfaces - IN , _ ' -- I to reduce spikes in stormwater flow and improve water quality in the process. Stormwater I- - infrastructure also offers opportunities for collaborations between TriMet and its jurisdictional - ' Y f and agency partners. Work is underway to confirm where these conditions specifically applyTM 0.1:0,0......_ ih . across the corridor.Additionally,ongoing coordination to balance potential development opportunities with stormwater treatment facility types and locations will continue throughout I PONDS/BASINS UNDERGROUND DETENTION project design. IMAGE SOURCE:GREENWORKS PC IMAGE SOURCE ARBITRARILYO CREATIVE COMMONS SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR STORMWATER CONDITIONS --. ,tZ. -� r,�C[ s� i it - elk .�� -A` ` ' -.R 1� _ '6t ' �. I` l -.t.i "1,e :?� 2 'moi, Ufa 1.776:11. 11' ^' ' �- �,�a; w TAYLOR S,.171$17.'2-7£.- _ ,TI __ ..,r�.0---.;. .fir -.It, . /s-�� .. � 'yD a. �i �'-�V M` 't#_Z �.w�i.�i '�g.-.G ,v �.�� .. =n _ „Ink i 4, L 1� h Y-',i f ,,,--,-0 .. * _ �.-_. CLINTON SI� s —.. _ •1•s�_',:›144...„ c �_ ! r ` y 9.77– ' -w `!, t 1 �._#�"�z••, �rF 0. ',../is - `. � — `T' _ . �-1Mi .'S 1 sr 4 a f • Yi -7 .1110.- , l Co Oned <: !1, 10=> I .( D Z g g 'g g Sewer \ , f SOUTH PORTLAND BARBUR CORRIDOR URBAN TIGARD RAILROAD RIGHT—OF-WAY Urban cores such as Downtown Portland have Barbur Corridor has complex topography.It is bordered by Urban Tigard has a mix of undeveloped open The railroad right-of-way through Tigard and significant quantities of impervious surface steep hillsides to the west and 1-5 to the east.Additionally, space,natural areas,building types and Tualatin has naturally permeable surface on from streets,parking lots and buildings. Barbur Corridor undulates between topographic high surface parking lots. It is also comparatively the Fanno Creek side and a large number Stormwater will be released into the city's points and low points,and has multiple stream crossings. flatter than Barbur Corridor.The toolkit of of surface parking lots and big-box office existing combined sewer system. South of SW 3rd Ave,the stormwater system transitions stormwater features will not be just limited buildings on the side bordering 1-5. from a combined sewer to a storm-only sewer.SW Barbur to streets,but potentially to large swaths of Blvd will generate large quantities of runoff,but can also greenspace interspersed all throughout urban be designed to capture large quantities of runoff. Tigard. Figure 4.30:Southwest Corridor Stormwater Conditions 73 STORMWATER TOOLKIT (CONTINUED) - • rl - 5k f ry Functions: ` � Functions: Functions: s - j • Water quality " 3111 ,. • Water quality • Water quality - ,.. • Detention > i. i ` .e • Detention • Detention V y .` ;r• ' • Parking wall structures • Infiltration where viable moi__ Potential Project Application: 1 f-,Ax H k ,:- i • Large depressed facilities _ i • Systems buildings ' t i`4, Potential Project Application: • Parking structures . • Parking lots , Potential Project Application: • Under structures '-k, - • Surface lots GREEN ROOFS SWALES • Stations CONSTRUCTED • Tigard WETLANDS �i Functions: f;y . Functions: Functions: • Water quality, II - 1 • Water quality • Existing,naturally occurring �� • Detention ' • Detention• • Habitat restoration • Steep areas • Retention planters 47. Potential Project Application: Potential Project Application: Potential Project Application: �•* Parks • SW Barbur Blvd • All segments • The Woods - ' • Greenspaces N ` • The Woods • Barbur Blvd • Pocket parks - • Vegetated corridors TERRACING • Stations INFILTRATION BASINS • Under structures NATURAL AREAS -- i Functions: Functions: Functions: • Conveyance - .:.' • Water quality and detention • Water quality - • Vaulted pavements/structural "�•i--�� • Detention&Infiltration '-S-Ut 1. • / Potential Project Application: - soils/Silva cells = • Larger areas • Stations — • Compact green design option '' • Near wetlands '-.' 'w""!'eu . • Root paths,continuous srnm n °• - III trenches Potential Project Application: -- • Operations and maintenance CREATIVE STORMWATER TREES/ Potential Project Application: STORMWATER PARK facility CONVEYANCE TRENCH • SW Barbur Blvd • The Woods '• Upper Boones Ferry 11-11.5Functions: ,. Functions: � - Functions: 4 ;1-7 . • Water quality • Detention underneath .''� • Water quality • Detention • Infiltration where viable 01 • Habitat restoration • Good for narrow,linear spaces z ~- • Materials:concrete,asphalt, • In-stream detention/storage • • Traffic calming -ter— pavers t' v_ r_ - ._;' Potential Project Application: Potential Project Application: ._ ;-__ Potential Project Application: _ • Stream crossings ,.- -7 • Streets(All Segments) • Sidewalks FLOW-THROUGH • SW Barbur Blvd POROUS PAVEMENT • Platform STREAM PLANTERS • The Woods • Parking lots(Park&Rides) RESTORATION Figure 4.31:Stormwater Toolkit 74 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 4.11 Urban Design Elements URBAN DESIGN TOOLKIT Urban design elements of the project will seek to make stations, structures, and other functional elements of STATION ELEMENTS:PASSENGER AMENITIES STATION ELEMENTS:SAFETY&SECURITY the project attractive and safe.These elements will - u reflect both the character and values of their immediate .ate _ �� surroundings found in each neighborhood,and provide - ! 1 x_ consistency to the functional and visual definition of -- liMii W f1 �' T light rail transit facilities. In addition to elements already i t�0° I _ described in this chapter,others include: lighting, , +'• _R-- •..„1,k• : iI-., A i tv • _ -- wayfinding,screening elements, paving treatments, - ` _ ` w - lib _, .•= railings, benches, bike amenities, planting areas, and imellis street trees.The type, size, and location of these items ' . . .J. p — ��, will be reviewed with the public,to guide final design of / - "'� the project. BENCHES LIGHTING IMAGE SOURCE:MAYER/REED IMAGE SOURCE.MAYER/REED 111.111 I T \�� =__ - - - r "" -A., r _ im • il.K:-ti-.-._ .._ � M R - j!,.-- .,- ,,,.., iiiA E , . . I /T .L,.] ,u,u �.' ,__ ....t.ptronimiiism4 fY4 , ...------___ 001.1111.11" , 4..., TRANSIT SHELTER AND SCREENING PLATFORM RAILING IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR . tt k.- . -..; r s1' Illir ( . -.A ��` : { (ii IIE E,_,__., -.1=,t ,_,--.: 7..7,4.= . Nomml fill - , _ __. � �:� WASTE RECEPTACLES TACTILE PAVING IMAGE SOURCE:LANDSCAPE FORMS IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR Figure 4.32:Urban Design Toolkit 75 URBAN DESIGN TOOLKIT (CONTINUED) STATION ELEMENTS:SIGNAGE&WAYFINDING PUBLIC REALM PUBLIC REALM t I 1 ....ANN.— ' - . ................... '''''... - i ' .j ' (k : ! ' . :� - I 1_ lif rIII it 1r 1111K.,.. _ tit i - 3 �l- II 1 IQ - y - �I QTY.,b. .;rt II __¢ -aw MN � � - , TICKETING EQUIPMENT SCREENING PLAZA ELEMENTS IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKS IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR IMAGE SOURCE:GREENWORKS Nion ,out Waterfront'SW _- _ - ,, ,.�F , .. ,. .._ .....; if-, .• ' 40160, • .0. - A Lincoln St Lin Eoln St -_ o' ) �?.. AIAZ r; SW3rd Ave Sri 3rd Ave ". it !�. }.; 1;17 � �,' i ,,,,ii art j pQ 1.1 ',f 41 City Center Milwaukee !./ I f' , I STATION WAYFINDING SIGNAGE LANDSCAPING AND STREET TREES LOW WALLS IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR IMAGE SOURCE:GREENWORKS IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR ell1";. r.�0a / _ - - - -1 , 1 i 417-7. i . _. - I 1 '8 1 �•- p (,MA%Orange Una to CNV 2 0Ili 4 - ~" _ iI: R - - 'Vw remervrgm Center �` ,T- 2 P�T� ;i 16 MAX Orange lam to Mllwaukla 8 1' �w A '� .. -.. ._ , -_. .___ :f•i�•_ ill! t1� eg Powell..mcresnan TG S J��1� _ ' � 'I' - - - - - - _ ' e n noiyale le SE loam Ave mm f Ik I A"• _ ▪ 'r, - t'f e A]Tayler¢Far,to1Neangten AS i I y_ - ~1- sgaam 1 ,n - II --- `l 1111 �_ L RIDER INFORMATION (MAPS&REAL—TIME ARRIVALS) PLAZA PAVING BUS FACILITIES IMAGE SOURCE TRIMET FLICKR IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET FLICKR IMAGE SOURCE TRIMET 76 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT • 4.12 Station Access Toolkit A. TriMet provides bus, light rail,commuter rail and paratransit services p Walking throughout the region.Access to transit is increased through infrastructure Co investments, such as bike facilities and parking.The scope of the Southwest Park&Ride Biking Corridor Light Rail Project includes integrated elements to support station 17 access including the Marquam Hill Connector and a variety of streetscape improvements, such as sidewalks, bike facilities,traffic signals,etc. Both transit i`1 nl-- � a ir access and choosing alternatives to single-occupancy vehicles are supported t,„„...7.07by third party mobility options, such as bike share. Portland Portland Streetcar Aerial Tram TriMet is working to enable a mix of mobility solutions to connect riders to transit. Figure 4.34 below identifies the access tools considered by the project. (AsThe"TriMet Access Tools"section below highlights the mobility tools that are MI included in the opening day project scope. ' • Bikeshare * Carshare (BIKETOWN) Ridesource fl Scooter Figure 4.33:Sample of tools for transit access TRIMET ACCESS TOOLS ► SHARED RESPONSIBILITIES • ACCESS TOOLS BY OTHERS PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES �4 SUPPORTING TRANSIT- MOBILITY SERVICE ACCESS I I ORIENTED COMMUNITIES TOOLS - • Enabling developments near • Coordinating with privately i l� 1 111 INTEGRATED STATION ACCESS -kms rix stations and within the project w „ operated mobility solutions r --7,---- i e' J' footprint i f beyond the project footprint to • c0_ _; provide more and better travel BIKE FACILITIES AND PARKING • Enabling transit oriented _ - development on publicaly-owned choices that increase convenient sites such as Barbur Transit access to transit service BUS STOPS AND TRANSIT Center,Tigard Park&Ride(at CONNECTIONS Pacific Highway/99W),Bridgeport PARTNER PROJECTS Transit Center/Park&Ride • Other opportunities • Southwest Corridor infrastructure SOUTHWEST SPACE FOR MOBILITY TRANSIT- • Other the potential corridor as coordinatedieMOBILITY and access projects that are not alongCORRIDOR LIGHT SOLUTIONS ORIENTEDby jurisdictions and housing SOLUTIONS BY included in the project scope RAIL PROJECT COMMUNITIES developers OTHERS PARK&RIDE FACILITIES ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Figure 4.34:Areas of responsibility and coordination for different access tools 77 Mobility infrastructure for riders must be located where STATION SITING AND PLACEMENT FOR ACCESS TOOLS it can be most conveniently and safely accessed. Access and mobility solutions capture different trip0 $319b M aIR IR distances (travel reach). Certain solutions may also be more easily adopted or prioritized by communities WALK BIKE TRANSFER MOBILITY SERVICES AUTO based on convenience,comfort and cost. Where space is limited adjacent to the station,street Neighborhood Trips (less than 3 miles) Target Range for Mobility Elements .. right-of-way and/or private development can provide TRAVEL SITING alternative locations to support mobility solutions. REACH Local Trips(3-10 miles) RANGE Optimal Range for Mobility Elements N Regional Trips(greater than 10 miles) (based on Station Access Hierarchy) Figure 4.35 explores a framework which provides a range of distances where mobility solutions can be optimally placed around a station. 4111111:11:114' p STATION ADJACENT BUS SERVICE 1100, Less than half a minute(or approximately A 100') from the station by foot,these solutions ISI benefit from good visibility from the station platform and direct interface with the project. leit PARK&RIDESR .. ?na1CAR SHARE 4111 a Bridgeport P&R BIC,53rd+ 'C.,,,:. - IR O ONE BLOCK FROM STATION . ' - 68111 P&R Less than a minute(or approximately 200') Hall P&R from the station entrance by foot, solutions LIGHT RAIL STATION may be located where passengers may be willing to walk slightly further to access them. NI OA ONE BLOCK FROM STATION AND BEYOND MICRD MOBILITY we Roughly 1.5 minutes (or approximately 400') from the station entrance by foot,these solutions include Park&Ride,as well as less frequent local services, and a variety of private operators, including car share. 0 MICRO TRANS!% Figure 4.35:The Station Access Hierarchy for Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project informs the siting of mobility solutions around a station area. 78 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 0 WALK ACCESS TOOLS: ir- - _ TRANSIT-ORIENTED {COMMUNITIES x • •• 4 $ OS L'' _ Walking is the primary means to access transit. Studies �`{' ,, show that people who live or work in communities ` y .;- s}' with a mix of housing, services and convenient access i?, 14 imi '•Ye '-"i to transit tend to drive 20-40% less, using alternative :Ii' i: N. + " x '7*+: ¢' ..*Yoliesillirillisr modes such as transit,walking and biking.These types - i til-"-:---.- ti-. of communities better enable individuals and families to • • `• reduce their reliance on autos and offer better mobility + - Nur -1 --c„ -. for non-driving populations. I • �, � ;.•� ; •I}., - s,.,y.... _ T The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project includes 10 � I� � ..4 ,�-•, � �� _ miles of new,standard bi-directional sidewalks and 1 - � +- 4 ` t P1 f " Li --4 �-Ij crosswalks to improve comfort and promote walkable � .i,s• ' a• LL h 1{ � • "' `� � �14 access to transit and local station area amenities. , - `1' • , I ,.� • ' Creating inviting pedestrian places and expanding • . _ - .., •-• • F±F• `'.+ _ . ..• •= . ` '' the number of people living near transit increases the y -.'• '°ts ;F i,..-....,..7::-....... ..;,.•�'-- 15' '„ number of transit patrons and the overall vitality of the • _may •= ; - , surrounding community. In the Southwest Corridor, - -- many different types of development are possible. Local _- .. • - - � _ _ jurisdictions are leading related land use processes to Figure 4.36:Transit-oriented communities,such as at Orenco Station,create patterns of activities and services that support increased envision Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project station transit use. areas,and in some cases, adapting development codes to allow for residential uses or introducing context- sensitive equitable development tools. AFFORDABLE HOUSING SUMMARY AFFORDABLE HOUSING MOU Commitment The project recognizes the value of providing new Project Partners:TriMet,Metro,City of Portland, light rail service and the importance of preserving City of Tigard,Washington Countyzl iii affordability,and avoiding displacement of Jurisdiction Committed Potential Estimated i disadvantaged residents who often rely on transit. Goal Capacity on „ '�_ 11 Project partners are committed to supporting Remnant Parcels '� development of affordable housing along the light rail ��.x� okaaI� • alignment. Figure 4.37 highlights the MOU committed Portland 600 610-930* r - I0 goals within each jurisdiction (Appendix C)as well affordable housing affordable housing I - as thepotential estimated unit capacity on remnant units units IOW ' iiii j Ii p Y = r parcels(Section 3.4). Tigard 150 710-1300 - 111 f '; w affordable housing affordable housing .. q�'' - units units l , Ali *Barbur Transit Center and Ross Island Bridgehead parcels are not included in this evaluation,and are undergoing a separate planning process to identify redevelopment opportunities. Figure 4.37:Affordable housing development Figure 4.38:Project partners are working to advance transit- oriented affordable housing along the project alignment. 79 cab BIKE ACCESS TOOLS: BIKE PARKING BIKE ACCESS TOOLS The quality of the surrounding bike network,topography and the types of trips made by bike will influence the demand for short-term or long-term parking,with secure options at each station. Bike parking typologies _ 1 in Section 3.7 help determine recommended quantities 'I ' ll Iµ�' `� _ f� FUNCTION: for each station. !du,w. _ --- •Short-term use -----) : A •Standardized staple rack design • Bike racks may be covered by weather protection where Bike parking is typically located within 100 feet from practical the station platform.This allows riders to conveniently secure their bikes and head directly to the platform, and STATION APPLICATION: vice versa.The areas around the platform also have All Stations • greater visibility,and therefore promote greater bike security to deter bike theft. BIKE RACKS In some cases, bike parking's smaller footprint can be IMAGE SOURCE TRIMET integrated into furnishing zones (sharing the same strip _ as street trees and landscaping), behind sidewalks, andIse�� 7•t'' 11,� FUNCTION: in plazas. Bike&Ride facilities are standalone facilities } - - ' ''� �'. •• Long-term use T •Standardized locker that maybe grouped together and that may also be located in a plaza or Park&Ride where e '9 9 P 9 space is available. - } stacked • Requires stewardship and maintenance , .e . 1;.., A ° ;::. STATION APPLICATION: El TRANSFER ACCESS TOOLS All Stations In addition to light rail service,the Southwest area of the region can expect to see improvements to bus service. BIKE LOCKERS Bus service enhancement plans will be advanced IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET through a public process about a year prior to opening. l: FUNCTION: i:/S Bus stop siting,typically located within 100-200 feet f E '," •Secure,enclosed structure from the station entrance,will be confirmed during the a�<< r•• • May be coordinated with BikeLink or Hop Card access • Bike t �� .�;.. Final Engineering Phase of the project. Conceptual _.4.121. j __ .r locations are identified in Chapters 5-7. — --- mo � . '..y,.;V.; � . � r.L. -,,,,r,..4.,.-. 4,, STATION APPLICATION: I. ga' �! • Gibbs Street StationW • '- 4_::::.,` a' 68th Parkway Station (Potential) Bridgeport Transit Center ENCLOSED SECURE BIKE&RIDE IMAGE SOURCE:TRIMET Figure 4.39:Different bike tools will be implemented at each station based on recommended bike parking demand. 80 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT MOBILITY SERVICE ACCESS TOOLS PRIVATE MOBILITY SERVICE ACCESS TOOLS Emerging mobility services can promote connections to transit.The project recognizes that more travel A4 MOBILITY SERVICES FOR 3-10 MILES .. MOBILITY SERVICES FOR<3 MILES choices can increase the comfort and convenience 0 CAR-SHARE ELECTRIC BIKES AND SCOOTERS of transit service for all. Adapting stations to various Car sharing programs allow people to access a shared System for electric scooters or bikes whereby users use a travel choices is especially important for vulnerable fleet of vehicles on as-needed,per-hour or per-mile basis. phone application to rent and ride to their destination. populations, such as older adults,economically Space Requirements:Marked parking space(s) Space Requirements:Parking area disadvantaged households and people with disabilities. Market demand for these services varies for each station based on demographic, land use and station 0 ON-DEMAND RIDE-HAILING 0 BIKE SHARE(DOCKED/DOCK-LESS) design consideration. See Appendix J for more detail. Ride-hailing matches riders with drivers with riders in System of bicycles available to users to access as needed real-time through mobile applications. for point-to-point or round-trip trips. Throughout Final Engineering, project partners will be Space Requirements:Drop off zone Space Requirements:Space for dock(parking area if dock- coordinating with private sector companies who own less),within or near to station or operate these services to assess options for mobility services. Ongoing coordination with local jurisdictions will be key to accommodating these emerging travel ON-DEMAND SHUTTLES 0 CIRCULATOR SHUTTLES options,to plan for flexible curb space and seek Shuttle service that can be on-demand in real-time or Shuttles operate on pre-defined,fixed routes in opportunities adjacent to stations. fixed route service updated frequently. controlled environments(autonomous or driver-operated). Space Requirements:Drop off zone Space Requirements:Drop off zone IR DRIVE ACCESS TOOLS: PARK& RIDES AND PICK UP/DROP OFF Figure 4.40:Future partnering opportunities with private providers to enhance mobility and station access. Note:these services are not Park&Ride facilities serve riders from farther distances included within the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project scope. or from locations without convenient transit service PARK & RIDE LOCATIONS to access the light rail system. Park& Rides may also be designed in the future to accommodate additional STATION ENTRANCE TO EXISTING PARKING PROPOSED MAXIMUM mobility services, including Bike& Rides, pick-up/drop- TYPE STATION PARK&RIDE DISTANCE SPACES QUANTITY off and ride-hailing,and car-share parking, as well as other types of development opportunities. Surface Barbur Transit Center Less than 100' 368 Up to 300 Park&Ride (Across Barbur Blvd) Pick up and drop off locations will be sited as feasible at each station location. 53rd Avenue Station Less than 100' 0 Up to 310 (Adjacent to station) 68th Parkway Station Less than 100' 0 Up to 350 (Adjacent to station) Hall Boulevard Station Approximately 300' 0 Up to 100 (Across OMF access (103 at WES P&R) road) Structured Bridgeport Transit Approximately 200' 368 Up to 960 Park&Ride Center (Accessed via pedestrian walkway) Figure 4.41:Park&Rides are located throughout the corridor,adding upon existing lots or creating new lots to meet ridership demand 81 4.13 Creating Places at Stations ti. - �'k. r , -. � - - -..-_- - :,. 1, A . The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project seeks . -- # ''` -.p- .--- '1 . - to incorporate flexibility to accommodate future ti, ` , ., t e — Ala _ :-_ : -,r- --, i1� 4 ,,1 - ice opportunities as mobility and land use conditions change. ►_- �� r4• \}; _' • - ,I s- Five opportunities described below summarize typical 4_ , , \ , I - conditions at light rail stations. Each station has a .4 -, y ,- -- different different context that influences where mobility solutions j '� can be placed. x �, ,. _ - 0 f �� These types of opportunities will require ongoing —� ' _ =` f 17# - YP pP q 9 9 — — — coordination between developers,property owners and N.- * = - - / jurisdictions. Not every opportunity is present at each - t :� station. y _ �. L i ha ters 5-7 explorewh fopportunities " c ` C p at types o access 1 -- --_ may be present at each station location. - - - ._=.,„‘„,,_._40,,_ 11 �:1� ____ = Figure 4.42: )pportunity areas along the light rail alignment for mobility solutions EXPLORING FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES FOR MOBILITY SOLUTIONS 0 New Transit-OrientedAdapting Existing Adapting the Right-of- Places Places Way F Mobility solutions can be Property owners may work Future mobility solutions 1 integrated into buildings at with the city and mobility may be located along the ,r 1 the ground floor, in a parking �� providers on solutions such curb or along the sidewalk garage or associated as in a parking lot or other a f f within a public or private exterior area. exterior area. street-outside of the project boundary. 0 Adapting Park&Rides0 Public Realm Mobility solutions may be Mobility solutions may introduced into dedicated be integrated in an area Park&Rides,such as pick- set aside for stormwater up/drop-off zones or space needs,systems buildings or - for other mobility services. Ii hardscaped plaza. 82 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT OPENING DAY __ __ r • _-ter= � - _ On opening day,the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project OPENING DAY -Y r, t: = = - -- - will include items as defined within thepscope ect and - - _ _ -= 1=- as described in this report. - - - - :- -2-_---_-____-,,---_--,--_= -- _ _, _ _- _ -=--- _ fY_f r--- - - This Conceptual Design Report focuses specifically _= _ _- _ _ __ __=_ 1' on the transit system functional elements and their - - Y = _____=-= " _ =-r- ==� - - aesthetics,character and siting,as well as integrated � - - -- - �- --= � -- �- - -� _ access projects. In some cases,selected elements = w¢� Y� Y " of'place-making'are also included within the project - -t :� _ ;;, � � ti. .. boundary,such as transit plazas. '` ._ _ _ ` _ T - ::1 al OP t- r_ FUTURE VISION �*��" C. Transit projects are complex,and so is their urban r _: �"��` _ _ ' design. Developing new light rail infrastructure opens - - _ ,-�-•: .� -/, •- - - -- q-� ` -c up many opportunities to improve and expand upon �� '�''' _- community values for mobility,equity,climate change, -� -. _- = r _ -`- --_ _=-__ _ y ci-----'- land use and other goals. _ • , , V 4- - rwr- w ii - / The future vision for a transit project like the Southwest - - --- Corridor Light Rail Project may ultimately include many opportunities for new mobility services supporting = _ _ = --FUTUREVISION ' -�- station access,buildings and other kinds of investments _ 1 == - that help communities take advantage of the public #" '�- - __ _- - - " -- investment of a system. High-capacity transit encourages - _ r 1. _ _- _- vibrant cultural centers,business corridors and mixedt. '' _ = = • = _ � _ income housing. _ - = R 3 All a i> .r1-1l 1J1111ii ill iiiIIiI!iUl1H1 These are improvements that will be initiated and funded _� v " ' f by others. xr -W_ - -'i1�11131II i iis=liIrlF c 111 I s� �i� � lil�. _ .6 R - ,�� ii ..,i' 1e i ii "'.i- _ -��- Wil' - '�' Fli. y+�il - _Ai ..T.-..... FIr Ff - 1. � -.-2- , ,- i,'''-�-- -- I , .. 3 .111:110 l'' ---• - • +--Pk--- y Mature tree canopy and stormwater features, Mobility hubs can introduce infrastructure Transit-oriented development can provide over time,can create a more attractive street- that accommodates other mobility options, open space and a mix of uses that allow for level pedestrian experience" like e-bikes and scooters. vibrant activity within the station area. Figure 4.43:Opening day scope and future station area vision upon coordination with partners 5 DESIGN CONCEPTS : INNER PORTLAND 84 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT DESIGN CONCEPTS: INNER PORTLAND 83 5.1 Project Highlights 85 5.2 Moving Around Inner Portland 86 Station Access and Partner Projects 88 SW Naito Parkway Main Street/ Ross Island Bridgehead 89 Neighborhood Access 90 5.3 Downtown Tie-In 92 5.4 Gibbs Street Station 94 5.5 Marquam Hill Connector 98 5.6 Barbur-Naito Street Network 100 5.7 Hamilton Street Station 102 5.8 Capitol Highway Bridge Replacement 106 5.9 Viaducts Replacement 107 Co I N o c - J ca d p f (n N v N R .�•' O C U ca W44 tco LT. U y Y " o y L 'y m ca'iai s .. Q N j N O_ •R 'N (Q (6 d �. m .. .. N C C C > y ' - -O O O O Lie: • z po --.. �p cn c.D o cc cc cc w • M if E any iuepeoefy it M _ (en+pea9MN �,• 1Au a d I .. Je�1ddJ ```\ �,,, �.�.�..L.,, ,,,,,e,,, ,,,,.. .,,,,,„.„��,,,.,,�, ��,.„,11,11,11,11,.��mOmMininau��u,1�11,1��.�1111��.�,.��.,��,��utti 4°4iv,' I1SAu a . 7 ” I _ _ e/1Jod tO i c I w pnig Ja5i nual MS oio� a 4x a4 z o d U � i L:".. N az y \y... . —— a ax \-'S' sfell/1 MS w1 a m Q x y h 7 I \— L#slieilMS I 7 it <n >-o m •� as s — m as a” as 03 �_� c C7 v cn '� >..- a�0 3co.o o .- x = .-• a� COcu CO CO L Z c o 0 al O M O _ n3 NMI 8 '_' h a O d O U 0 4g d O@ U C C Q O = c- _co Q co O o TV N > p= O - . O �> co a v O> E os J (n 0 C a/ Y d = •o N ^, r o cncr) a� cct' m +-• y v .Y -o H -o = _ I— Y 'cc,' Fa m E VJ •.a 1 3 0 0 'a�3 vn •o •- ••o aa, a� —}o c, W - o Z _s- E J y? W p 'C VJ O C O C co O_ @ Q O C N cu O ~ p C co 2 Q= C co N cu w ya °' ci) as a3t °0 -a o-'m E `�° C= Z 'N c -o Z o a) c6 = E p L .Ja 0H2 o as cog 0 c U= 2 co 0 co o m C as n r a 3 —_ as o Y'_ m n v a o o v c cu .> au o y a o c a' =o ,_ CO ac'..5 U 3 0 o a 2 o p _n > m CD 0 a� cGO `t ,� 4 co-a 0 o a` c Y c � E C o U aai v o W _o c D a.=-J C O CT L > ^ y 6f •N-O C O c0 c9 a fn 00_4,7; a C Q 7 C Q J O _, a O O Yl C O c g C D_ O- O O W Q aJ 0 m 4 Q C d' Y C O_ (n Q� v 0 o,s o .a3aC > o m F., .0 0 aoi w m Q C5 E au 3 °� E U d y = n a w 'v c —_ Y z > W m g H o E@ 3 .Q= •0-:ELS C Q) CO N'O .N C -=-',..� J a) C m-6 >L Q T`° cV'o N (n a- C•2 CO c cn N COY X U O a1 o as °' ai +-Y m a O co Q v Z m N =Y O-O N C cu W -O CO cu cn .a W a) O OCe C 7 C Y V) L cO_O C w coE_c C3 N C fl O C a 3 L v ar Q 2 .§ v L m V E 0 c E w 0 > m o a3 '. 0 0 pi co L Y S i a c - 'm c H W .- E c m o cc c.> a w 3 a) () y o a7 41 a' O Q)_0 N C L C= v 'C H Z 0 al 0 a'y0. = U =�O in a� CL a) H i O c= `1 N E > >i -c 7 'O L CJ C M W z E C D = O 'p-o UJ D a5 O7 ZT n -gyp a'L O a' c” O-O z -- O O Z O at-,..,a' .0 Z O C- c _C d d Cn E 3 F C O ' J Y N O W V O'. c O tO Q (EII'O (O Q C O C t c L v c . o " c 3 co m D au .o E n c a w o o c •//1 C� u, 3 . O ?i Cn -O O O N-O 8 H Z LCJ O E •'y 0 z 6 0 C T (O C — i .- e o a� c -> D o .e -a cu cv 7 C.) Q E-o o a3 _ Q C as .-- as > .Fs cn V N CI V m d--H O_' Q c- o tO N N 3 W m C d-0 Q) z C v Q Y co 3 m in L N Qa) •_ �'. N = 0 3-O aJ C C O ?� U Y Y '— V'O C M Q L C 7 co W a) E a) p» •o r .L+, > > a" -a Ce Q V '� N co H m v7 co a c[ Z co = o d o a o., as > ,_ 0_in 0 c a 3 CU °cu '7 c © N r r a' cn o : CO c-o o s Q -o � d o a' m Q� ' c c o rm o� 0 = + 0 1A HN 5: c-7)'E. Em o>0 8 oZ c/) V 5 49 86 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT _ 5.2 Moving Around Inner Portland these conditions. It strengthens east-west connections, including new crossings on SW Barbur Blvd and ACCESSING THE STATION intersection improvements to SW Naito Pkwy.The - - • Gibbs Street Station sits at the nexus of a historic Marquam Hill Connector will connect Gibbs Street Station :-_ ..1 neighborhood,wooded parkway and major medical to Oregon Health&Science University's(OHSU) Marquam `:.. center.The station provides a link between the Lair Hill campus.The shared transitway relieves traffic h ' Hill neighborhood, known for its pedestrian scale congestion while allocatingmore space within SW Barbur ,,•-- _ and historic architecture,and Terwilliger Parkway, Blvd's limited right-of-way for buffered and protected ::.-- r..: e. "' 't; - ` - with its expansive natural setting and views. Buses bikeways and improved sidewalks. ,=` : • •' x d a ; :. - _ and the Portland Aerial Tram further link the station • ", ., %.- area to regionally significant employment,recreation Seamless access improvements require close coordination .` _ ;u --4.• g Y 9p q f � .%- -- -'�and medical centers on Marquam Hill and the South between all project partners.Southwest Corridor Light Rail ';-' i ��i`.' '_ _ _'' �.. Waterfront. Project Station Access planning has been developed in .= 'E • Yh' ' , '"�.r. concert with Portland's Transportation System Plan (TSP), `3 ' Jr...., • k` ... `' ' • A majority of light rail riders will access Gibbs Street ; �. •= ,''- •.:_-�-.',,;, Southwest in Motion (SWIM)strategyand Safe Routes t r F . Station by walking. However,the station will also be t to:- -s�' ` ✓. ` �, accessed by those taking the bus,since Gibbs Street to School program.A list of partner led Station Access ► ,. i' ',.,/ de.tk r Station shares its platform with both light rail and bus projects for improving pedestrian and bicycle access in IN +' Wit ' ;� riders. Inner Portland is on the following page. Note that not all Lair Hill/South Portland • projects currently have associated budgets and schedules. r:u'lir .. r. .. �i . 7; , ry.,�-.,/ • Hamilton Street Station riders are projected to arrive Some of these projects may be constructed in conjunction /�'` r ,Ill IIilP ` '-� by foot and bus transfers. Homestead and John's with the light rail project,while others will be constructed : \,ark 5 ;.� Landingcan be accessed directlyfrom Hamilton ..---Ir .`,`_ -" ,. ,i� ..-I, after opening day. Street Station,with bus routes along Corbett Ave ;k = �:" ':"» connectingriders to destinations and neighborhoods designconceptsp ''" g The included in this chapter show a small � , -; , further alongthe waterfront. area plan for each location with all projects included in the • For each station, projectpartners are exploring the current Southwest Corridor Light Rail funding.A - ',✓ -• ``' P 1 P 9 9 Projectg r, ..,4, best locations where passenger drop-off can be "functional plan'shows how each station contributes to r" . provided. access for walking,biking,driving,and transit,and how the : :- , •• '! , station fits into its existing context. `' - : :tr,•:' :, `: __�. ' . . . .. SPEED IMPROVING TRANSIT ACCESS � -:F` 0 'x .] 45 An inventory of bicycle and pedestrian conditions on6. :p•-:- _ 3.71-i r t:1 =A. ,; ,. :_ - blocks adjacent to each station has identified the following e .y . . ''` `�" ° s challenges in Inner Portland: • y • North-south arterials have limited crossing '4, '= INNER PORTLAND. The three-mile bikeshed reflects 2035 STATION RIDERSHIP the boundary of study for bicycle Source:Metro,2019 access to transit. Lloyd GIBBS* District 6,200 Projected Daily Tripsii) i �° �--� O 98 Percent Walk 4 -- Q 2 Percent Transfer Bike Use: ▪ 0 Percent Auto High ^f Downtown `! : i + : . F The dashed catchment area reflects Portland where people would likely bike to *An additional 7,600 projected daily trips are expected to get - .„ . . '-, )e,,,---...., F `�• 4 +r ‘•,'-----`------- off and off the Gibbs Street Station from buses that share the i - r� ;a -! same platform as the light rail line. `. '- Jackson The half-mile walkshed around each HAMILTON i (existing station) station defines what destinations '�' 1,800 Projected Daily Trips �, , ."� can be walked to in 10 minutes. 0 0 43 Percent Walk 4°0 Southwest____ ,.— e 46 Percent Transfer Bike Use:w Hills ;� T' ' 1...‘, ■ti i I Q 12 Percent Auto Lo ; 1 Gibbs `--'k• ',Brooklyn •• r'r _ -omestead `-. • y+ V -- *1-14milton 'r i — - ■ South /...:, r Waterfront •� .s'" ■ Hillsdale '~ ' - i^s ■y,� ,h % 13th I ' 19th South BIKING TO THE STATION Burlingame Although biking is not included in the ridership t�—}� calculations,stations will attract cyclists as future transit riders from the surrounding area,typically in a three-mile / range.Various factors may limit how far riders are likely to travel,including:viable streets for biking,terrain,rider behavior,comfort,station proximity and direction of travel. TriMet and project partners will assess these factors to help prioritize investments and identify missing links across the corridor. A 88 STATION ACCESS AND PARTNER PROJECTS The following map shows the location and geographic , Burnside Bridge extent for additional Southwest Corridor Light Rail r e Station Access Projects. Projects are highlighted that b` ; z4'' help to increase connectivity to light rail stations. Station coco access projects have advanced through the Shared Downtown Investment Strategy are included in the FEIS, but not the Portland .' s��o'frso project budget.These could be designed and built by the nB"d9e Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project(TriMet), if other sources of funding are secured. ��; 11%40,•„ n e B This map also includes relevant local projects led entirely adge by local jurisdictions.These projects will be coordinated with,and help to inform station area decisions.These 0 0��a�e projects are planned,funded,designed and constructed QJai by others,and are not part of the Southwest Corridor $ I �,acos A Light Rail Project. More information on these projects is • 0tocf.` available on the website of each project lead. • A \ •c` (1131 .---01 - Gibbs 0 l'�»m AO r� Homestead 1 © Hamilton STATION ACCESS PROJECTS — , O 1st Ave Bikewaya, 4' © Grover Bikeway I-- 0 © Hamilton Sidewalks and Bikeway Cr, Hillsdale s PARTNER-LED PROJECTS — Beaverrony'/�sda/ 3 O RPoss Island Td Bridgehead Reconfiguration(City of Py�y SP) SW�ap;to�NwY South Q SW Naito Parkway Main Street Project SW Vermont St Waterfront O SW Slavin Rd Connector(City of Portland TSP) ;.-._.. Figure 5.2.1 Station Access and Partner Projects ( — 0, 1000' 2000' 4000' A 89 PARTNER PROJECTS (CONTINUED) . _ 41P44,11491W i& 4.124rI ; L .� �" Ti1 AI*11t-OLP'-sr `� ��" r<4.4tikrad L44.-\ \ I ,,,, , . , _ ... , . ,,. : .,- ...,- . .,„„,,, , 7„,„,...._ ,...07 :. tyllOW •� J z -.4:00, �.e ARTHUR ST k, -- \.... 0.„. ________---- - C 1 - :tc HOOKER ST n N` „ .',• . "A PORTER ST 12 -ti n .O �g�- _WOODS ST Qiiiii,iii tilillitiPriSSS\S�-p`� GROVER ST killi f , , A 1 S eit: _. . 0 MIMI: 1 IlL' iii- -AM Oaral l ROSS ISLAND BRIDGE +� m '1, -AA . .0 . WHITAKER ST ., RECONFIGURATION z `'`r' D , New Roadway iNtat n ; _ O m ►� ,_.s, ilk Removed Roadway 7C �c. .m t = �'1 New At-Grade Crossing Mil -I m ;o i y k it) Q New Si nalized Intersection30 _ m '� D .1: Signalized y A. !r '11 New Parcel swHoo sfiz sr SWNAIIO PKWY. k _ , 0 _ .4., N .- . „,.., .I`.�e I s•+i 1 -.- Figure 5.2.2 Overview of SW Naito Parkway Main Street and Ross Island Bridgehead Partner Project =�'��4� i I __ — ` SW NAITO PARKWAY MAIN STREET AND ROSS ISLAND BRIDGEHEAD '(. i! ' F4 k1 -, — ,� ' - ►, I �J _ The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project will be closely coordinated with partner �' I rlli 'll F ; - '''.7-...-1111r- 7441. ,. projects,including the SW Naito Parkway Main Street Project and the Ross ..E. , "f ' - .---_-4:,___•E _ - ---------- Island Bridgehead Reconfiguration, led by the Portland Bureau of Transportation. . - .•.'41,... "--...g.... ;. This project aims to improve bicycle and pedestrian connectivity within the , •r� South Portland neighborhood and redirect regional highway traffic away from ; _ ..� . neighborhood streets.Additionally,the reconfiguration of bridge ramps will open - _ up approximately three acres of publicly owned land for affordable housing and development opportunities (See Appendices C and E). i \ - ' ` Figure 5.2.3 DRAFT Vision of SW Naito Parkway Main Street and Ross Island Bridgehead Partner Project 90 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT NEIGHBORHOOD ACCESS e S The following diagrams show the proposed vehicular 3 W Marke circulation for Inner Portland,which highlights possible WJa i et traffic mitigations, new or modified signals and design of ckson k/ f� intersections to support u-turns and turning movements 6t Ptadjacent to the project alignment. New enhanced hq • pedestrian crossings will be added throughout the Ra,ip/ * _ project,significantly improving the pedestrian safety and SW Linco n crossing opportunities along the alignment. New enhanced pedestrian crossing treatment types will continue to be explored as a valuable measure in providing increased 111 pedestrian safety and permeability across major streets. ft Additional crossings also benefit access to new and SW Caruthers St improved bike facilities built by the project. SW Sheridan St • iff 1-405 0 - Ott- a.) . V , Q CU 21 fibSW Arthur St '' U Y g\vd . SW Meade St N Fp \\\\ger +Swjerw \'' E SW Hooker Y SW Porter St SCALE:NOT TO SCALE r t o SW Woods St LEGEND Q '� > Z 1 El ( ) Existing MAX Station GIh s SW Grover St 1-5 Proposed Light Rail Station c"' p1r' Allowable Turn Movements cn SW Gibbs St • Re-routed Turn Movements $r •-i Possible Diversion Routes (TBD) SW Whitaker St 0 New Traffic Signal > SW Curry St Replaced/ Modified Traffic Signal �,� a' • New Enhanced Pedestrian-only Cros: aSW Pennoyer St a) (I) New Gated Rail Crossing a' a> > — Proposed Road Closure o Ys "' SW Gaines St o I U Turn Restricted ' _ ,,,,,4' '�'\'� o m Note: Diagram does not indicate existing N SW Lane St N N signalized intersections to remain. ,,i SW Abernethy St Figure 5.2.4 Proposed Neighborhood Access and Circulation 91 > ' V + Note: Design of roadway a o �� 1t�SW Thomas St a circulation within the Fulton Park SW Lowell St neighborhood will be refined over > 'IR"141P.. = c., 11' the course of project development SW Nevada St i and final engineering.To prioritize Cl) `" �� neighborhood circulation and safe SW Parkhill Dr 11 0 IL, SW Bancroft St . < Hamiito emergency access,the project �' �� will seek feedback through public CCn :rid y�� '��A engagement regarding possible SW Hamilton St `�',44 alternatives. + + > a a' SW Slavin Rd �' < < a' 1d -C `� U �n v Cr) a� m cn Ncn ! + " /i4& u� SW �' �� Cr) Rasmussen Village Bertha ''�� f — `T' 11� a> Blvd , Fulton Park EL- SW 4th Ave m` 8 co U ii Cl) • FA01011 C/) SCALE:NOT TO SCALE LEGEND t_1 Existing MAX Station O Proposed Light Rail Station �1r' Allowable Turn Movements 1 -0 Re-routed Turn Movements ii m .-if Possible Diversion Routes (TBD) 0 New Traffic Signal m 0 Replaced/ Modified Traffic Signal '121' • New Enhanced Pedestrian-only Cros: New Gated Rail Crossing Proposed Road Closure pito) Hw s 11 1-5 fi. U-Turn Restricted Note: Diagram does not indicate existing issignalized intersections to remain. Figure 5.2.5 Proposed Neighborhood Access and Circulation Figure 5.2.6 Proposed Neighborhood Access and Circulation 92 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 5.3 Downtown Tie-In • . sem`c I ��J �' kson xisti...,----=•,---___,.-----Z--_-1 . / i., ./ • ,. st • a,,' New bus stop r rail latform S The 1.6 mile long shared transitway of the Southwest r P Sky-- , Corridor Light Rail Project crosses over SW Caruthers �� ,/ ' esr St,SW Sheridan St and 1-405 on an elevated structure, -2 , avoiding impacts to local and regional vehicular . circulation.Stretching through an overlay zone,the design . /11 Southwest?'. : / r of this structure will comply with the local design review ' Corridor Light Rail Southwest J and,buses enter r Corridor Light Rail • process. sit Mall / and buses exit j • i'•` Bu my to - I/ Transit Mall �' The light rail connection into the Portland Transit Mall s 6th v • provides easy and reliable connections to other frequent - —1... Q `1, I. I_L_I SW Lincoln St/SW a� 3rd Ave Light Rail service transit lines, including the Division Transit Project's _ ` -.___ platform new high-capacity bus service.The Downtown Portland tie- ne, W6 h -— \Ave off r. • • — _ —— SW Lincoln St - in design will also support City of Portland-led projects for s � f f = �_ . people walking, biking and taking transit through ongoing / `L�, are tr nsit y n • I' r J L 1 -- coordination for improvements such as the Green Loop, °da??./..- I sec on f I � Central City in Motion and Southwest in Motion projects. f� �J y 1 Key bus connection At SW 5th Ave and SW 6th Ave,train operations of MAX U �-'." to Division Transit '� i ok Orange Line and Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project, O SWGrantst Project Station sgr ill Southwest Corridor along with bus and vehicle circulation and pedestrian Light Rail lands next to crossings will be further analyzed in final engineering. r .ligned SW Grant St '• 1 ' '3 U[A Shared tran itwa on aerial st cture .... ...., vL, 0 New or Enhanced ,...„.„, �_ L Project Elements N.. !. ----\ ...,, o Roadway j�� I �4os Sidewalk . \. SWcaruthers St „__,,-. - 0 New/Enhanced Signal y Gated Crossing yi, Improved at grade _ Crosswalk lC ' i traffic signal I and crosswalks _ Enhanced Ped. L_.1 I A at SW Sheridan Crossing ` St intersection y yy_ \.\5i.' SW Sheridan St O ----_- n Project Feature : . (below Structure) 9 :- Existing Assets I 1-j__ 114 •• Existing Trail i / / Northbound i I` Signal at major .a u-turn under 0 9 1 i Duniway Park ro structure road Q i ,� Crosswalk(s)at �` m + . / Shared Transiay on (IIIIIflormad I „I l " Figure 5.3.1 DRAFT Downtown Tie-in overview 93 ., ; ...... 7 — 7r .- , . ;-• '''' Aigiliolitlir 11 '. 9'•-•.:; • All'..eit,-_,. ' A -7.-.-,-- •• .,_,, .• • * ,:r.7.1F-7 • ,•• • - ' . '......-1,,4.144. , '.-; .'W t ...• . -34. .':;: k''..1::-It elik---A' -.--. ....4'.:•-• ' Ir 4' . i'' . - . . 1•,:. : . ..._ • — ,.,4 •.-" .si-• . - skirizi... ...9600 • 1.v.1 ' : •• ' • .:r -7.- '• . • I ...:U '-..'''!* ' . • ..".. . .- - . . - i .. ,-. .A- .r ' • 1 140'• • - I ,... • ". .di , .,.. • .-.. ' .....1......._.......1=1/././.01/MO _.... - • '•%• ..Z. • . Al . li • " • • . , -........,•••••••••• ... ...-- ,, . . l• '..._ . . . ..=.:04.01 ; '.} • ' ellei.. 1 .. • '.. _ .. • . P-' r . .7 i.041,.. • .0., .., A \, , . ... ... ....: . • _• _• .._ . . • • . .•!..r•-..-.• - ,4- ' • .r, .. iii 7,11 ,::: ' .•-:• 14' .:Z. .--„-. .-1:7 —_:1-:.:4.----'-.-"Tirt:--".4‘;;47.—:''.., Iry o. . .• 'le:, ' • I. -Al' . .,, . , • • .-.. • C00. •.0•111.• P... li • . -AL. . ...• ,. -, N. ,... -„. . •• : . ..• . , : if .4.Gs -,.,.: m.„- • ...-.7....''. "-_., _ '. . . : .... 4.t. v. - ; _ '4- ..o. i • it - - A. • , :4. -, e• • ...• - ....,e. ,a. • - es ... .:' t 4..1 cu, •-,.. . . . lilt A • .. — ' lii. • -"'t r , firij • • 47 r. I 0 ,...• , ""Broadwa'y• - „, f • .., . 4,4., tr'4 70 . . .• : i. - • . 'r . .r• ' ' ('. • - - . 7 ',-C , 1 ., g • . . •,t- . . z. . it Figure 5.3.3 ip.75. L4L L.4 Ale.. ..,.. .-.- ,. , .. . . , , . . .1„, ._ t •' 4 0 4 • ,•_ - •. . . ,• ' ..' .. ..... • ' V.. ..- '..." 4t.A. . ['Mgw• , ... . ,...' .t. • . . p ,,..... ,.. ' • '••' .L.'.•...- 4. ....A . .• • • A . . Ati : . • ., .. •f 4 . ..•.„..„, ... . • ,, ,, • _ALn St -_#, .. ' . — j • Sy,/Sherma L 0, .. . .. t • .• 'IA. .4 )6' 1. ...7 ' '- . • ..•' ',.: .: '1:''.44--. ''',. -,,;111-r-' .4,..- . -,4,:.:1K. ... -1.1:,-,_ ...c.-. ..45..:,,,,' .,:, • -':,' S ..F. . i A .._ • . .__ r C •• .• ' I . ' . i. •'• ' 4 • ' • fi 4. . 4', :;;.1 % ':• ••, - • . .' 14 ,• %. 3':\' . - _ o, , ".• . 3: : .. -. .t'.4-sitiferati4_. - _4: . -4'.. ... - 1 . .1. • • • , .... 4. ,,-,. • . 41/4,!• ,, a '''' r - ,•-",• -.. • „....4 , " . ' •.- :if ..:P •A - ... '1: ''"''.1 - fr -/IIA , 1., I.- • • • .•• • . -• .41!,. V' 4 '31.- •' - ,.._ 1 - 1 .', :. .._ ..A._ .' ..,,br',.' . ' .:' :--• -0 .' .1'-• ' i"it.. ‘'.. 4...r . . ..V ' ..• .:;'t. • T.;.. N,-* .:=71ir -'.• . . . :It-- J ,.. <9 ., •"St , ‘ 34 , . . It.— I, . ''•• _.__<;.c . . :••• .. . . . . • , . .40, „a-7..4:: : -..,-.. ..... ._ , - ... • .4. .‘• 14- -1'::' --:''.. . ., .- . .. i .• ' • p- T ' 7. . - • -- . 41..'4 4 ;t: 1-. ' t'. . . . ' .-•'-'-il.i. - v. , ..•. .• - .• •-..,i ..tip.x*i'.[ ,` • ', • '''rl ..2 • -C - • ,r, ' • ,,. ; , ...•- - -4.L., -A, :0.-.. 4,.,,. , • t -'link r. •. -1 • ....°' '_--•. , • . .,.t,•.• -'‘-',...,.-.-22,-`'-,' — -A--.=.v_•-,•i..r6,,...,;....? 1, Aii.,•,, 4.•.-.•',..... i.. 11,,4/1(,• 4 • 71O .:..•- .•: ..., iiirie.A. • Al: Figure 5.3.2 DRAFT Downtown Tie-in aerial overview Z.1 . MINIM . , MI • -- 1. ...- 1... -1 .... 1W- -,s-; & -rii r.s,- F2,- •I=.11; ,-.-.,-- L-A'n 4..",,sagt`46--'4 ' '— • SW Grant St 1-405 On-Ramp SW Broadway SW Caruthers St cr r 16' 32' Figure 5.3.3 DRAFT Downtown Tie-in cross section 94 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 5.4 Gibbs Street Station . _, -0 6,200 Projected Daily Trips* „.. t,rt 401�� ,e . .7,,, •, iLi -_ 0 98 Percent Walk 01'0 ..„ .4_ .. . .; • Q 2 Percent Transfer Bike Use: 1 - 0 0 Percent Auto High -- • -- *An additional 7,600 projected daily trips are expected at Gibbs r a. e f • Street Station from buses in the shared transitway F�� y'' r --.. 4.-... kr.,...„:„. ■ e ■ - Nestled between the historic Lair Hill neighborhood and the ".' w aumw _41k �} + ' forested West Hills of Terwilliger Parkway,the Gibbs Street ` .----0"--- ..,.%:•.• �� Station will provide a critical connection for the thousands - „- '""'�wr � . : �� of employees, patients and students visiting Marquam Hill : --- every day. Enhanced pedestrian crossings will make it easier • _ �r� - 44z` • — , 1..\1\\\\ for South Portland residents to access Terwilliger Parkway's Y _ Ftv s �•i �1 - - •- natural beauty and expansive views. With a new crossing of _- � '� J __- -" SW Naito Pkwy and the Marquam Hill Connector,a pedestrian -�. �� ` -- _-_ i` connection will reach from the South Waterfront to Marquam r-• : - _ ""`Hill.These connections will provide direct access to the light • ~__ 4�" rail station,and a new public plaza. . Ai Q - i PROJECT BENEFITS - -_ o.' �?� 0 MOVE AND CONNECT PEOPLE �. - —' _ kms' . • Three new and improved pedestrian crossings along SW .• • • Barbur Blvd The design of the shared A new public plaza with amenities, Streetscape improvements will �A transitway at Gibbs Street Station O such as bike parking,serves users introduce a climate-appropriate • Enhanced pedestrian crossings of SW Barbur Blvd and '�O accommodates both light rail and of the light rail and Marquam Hill _ plant palette and improve the urban SW Naito Pkwy at SW Gibbs St intersections,connecting bus trips Connector tree canopy on SW Barbur Blvd neighborhoods Marquam Hill and South Waterfront Figure 5.4.1 DRAFT Gibbs Street Station Vision • Planned connections to bus lines 44,56(shared transitway) line 43 on 1st Ave,and lines 54,96 on SW Naito Pkwy DESIGN VALUES:APPLYING COMMUNITY FEEDBACK IN ONGOING DESIGN • One travel lane retained in each direction along SW Barbur • Provide a safe pedestrian connection between the station and the Marquam Hill Connector with adequate crosswalks Blvd,north of SW Naito Pkwy and plaza space to support high volumes of pedestrians 0 MAINTAIN AND CREATE EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES • Provide adequate secure and weather protected bike parking to support both access to transit and the Marquam Hill Connector • Access to Lair Hill, Homestead and South Waterfront neighborhoods,and Marquam Hill destinations • Provide a safe,accessible connection to the Lair Hill neighborhood that respects the historic character and coordinates with Naito Main Street and Darlene Hooley connections • Narrowed street section maintains emergency access while minimizing park and historic property impacts • Traffic mitigations,signals,and design of intersections to support u-turns and turning movements that provide adequate vehicular circulation to maintain access to neighborhoods and minimize neighborhood cut-through traffic • Access to Terwilliger Parkway,Duniway and Lair Hill Parks, SW Trail#1 • Explore and coordinate options for bike facilities along SW Barbur Blvd north of SW Naito Parkway intersection where existing properties constrain the right-of-way,and enhance connections to downtown through the planned facilities O PRESERVE AND RESTORE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT for SW Naito Parkway Main Street Project,SW 4th Ave bike lanes,the Green Loop,and Southwest in Motion projects • Enhanced street tree canopies and stormwater • Further design may identify opportunities for adaptive reuse of the synagogue building treatment along SW Barbur Blvd 95 PROJECT SCOPE . .1- \. 4. --•- ' SW Hooker St • Gibbs Street Station and light rail infrastructure _ _ �)� f • SW Barbur Blvd bike and pedestrian improvements - r National Univer ity of • Short-term and long-term bike parking Y Natural Medi ine it air Hill Park a J • Shared transitway for light rail and bus I • Marquam Hill Connector and Plaza 7S riner: -.s. — — Ic') + ^' q 1 Figure 5.4.41 L� I forrhi .re • Pedestrian ramp and staircase down to SW 2nd Ave/ � I • I f� — I. SW Gibbs St f Barbur streetscape 1 with buffered bike)lanes i '� '-"" ��lllllj on both sides 1 Pedestrian connection to iikk. • Ross Island ��,!r 1 1 SW Gibbs St Bridgehead - � Shared transitway station •.Gibbs I �_ I \Ct. 44 I :'..*\Zi l Terwilliger i, Parkway r!�" . 1 �g a Darlene Hooley 0 SU / ij I F ISW Gibbs St i .- �• I Pedestrian Bridge I Enhanced Pedestrian/ V Viewpoint of station vision rendering °JS I Marquam Hill �•t PkWy at SW SW of Gibs St Naito New or Enhanced Project Elements ExistingAssets 1 Connector Plaza :1„:.,,,_„1,-, Marquam Hill Connector- - S SW Whitaker St SW Trail#1 Roadway Multifamily (see Section 5.5) %\, I Sidewalk Employment =_ ; 0 New/Enhanced Signal Retail t_U. Gated Crossing Existing Trail •• '- I o r; NM Crosswalk Signal at �T =l i }: FililigiA; ,V �Enhanced Ped. major road I l �. . Pedestrian connection • CrossingCrosswalk(s) rtland VA to SW 1st Ave o' 100 200' 400'Ai Project Feature at major road / Pi clival Center �' J Figure 5.4.2 DRAFT Gibbs Street Station overview ROW \Ur H ROWI A m o m iiim f ....., ^ � � `' I I 1 1 // .8D O o0 00 n l of P 0 0 0 s Ki& 1 0 1 t 1 1 A i Sidewalk Buffered Travel Lane Trackway Bus Lane Light Rail Platform Trackway Travel Lane Buffered Sidewalk Bike Lane Bike Lane Figure 5.4.3 DRAFT Gibbs Street Station Cross Section 0' 4' 8' 16' 96 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT STATION FEATURES lammes SW Woods St _ ® Shared transitway platform I f' N� w; ; f Station environment for circulation to and visibility of • •. - 1-(6 Marquam Hill Connector(MHC) �` 1 ,j1 EL 30 Potential removal of synagogue building L , 0 4lk ® Wide pedestrian crossings Q New/Enhanced Signal y ; \ © Pedestrian island 41 '" 7 Buffered bike lanes ® Potential pick-up/drop-off A. N � g0 Existing stair to be rebuilt at new grade il B it LF J 10 Potential systems building,location subject to change 1 , iii\ 0 it\ _ _ 11 Stair and ramp access for improved pedestrian connection �� gil 0 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� SW Grover St �S, mild ` • 1■IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII o T11 di 17\ o ; ® V 1 , ,,‘ ‘ El {12 MHC Inclined / P Elevators :a: Q cey A. : ::( \ i 0. k\ c%tl ',\Ito ,71 „ 00.01 , 0 1.0\\ Ilk \ oilit 1j "li I _ AIL- lfoo..4" al \ Art 1 v. Ill ,_ump Hou e , 0 , � �� ` ._ Platform ——— Proje;;;::way T k IP 1 �� New/Improved New/Improved Sidewalk Roadwa '''..\ New/Enhanced y \ ,i. Signal Shared Transitway ❑ J tPedestrian Ballasted Track 'Ai 0 L'' I Crossing • Potential Bike Parking \,\. 1'� L ® Potential Bus Stop Illak- \ — low A Figure 5.4.4 DRAFT Gibbs Street Station Plan;Design is conceptual and will be further developed through community engagement and technical design efforts 97 STATION ACCESS PROJECTS 1 . . ' a la, -0- 1st Ave Bikeway - =_' f‘ill -©- Grover Bikeway 111 . k' 1 i, 4111 ... ' ••=1 '.:- Itr..1! 1, PARTNER-LED PROJECTS ___. S.,�' O ... -q II f -�_ Ross Island Bridgehead Reconfiguration(City of ri01 __ Portland TSP) }r r '. 1ME NM Ell IM ini Mg • -Q- SW Naito Parkway Main Street Project I r CAnk N 1 Q 1 ur Note:See Figures 5.2.2 and 5.6.1 for more detail about S- \ 1 _; 17©'! x1 + _ 4 , Partner-led Projects A and B. 1 • - SW Gibbs.S1' -- R" i ' _ • r O �I , . 1 -- � r� )61 ,-t!' 't („, it `� ;+ � � * if Imil N r .04 !� 1 . 1 re------------ii- 11 li• 0' 100' 200' 400' y;-a. 41 a MC as''• Figure 5.4.5 Gibbs Street Station Access Projects and Potential Partnering C) 1/2 Mile Station Walkshed 100/200/400'from Station FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES Based on station area context, project partners will explore the following: There is estimated demand within the station area for the following private mobility services: New Transit-Oriented Places Adapting the Right-of-Way Mobility solutions can be integrated into Future mobility solutions may be located ® Electric Bike/Scooter Share buildings at the ground floor,in a parking along the curb or along the sidewalk within garage or associated landscaped area. ' ,- 7 . , a public or private street-outside of the 0 On-Demand Ridehailing project boundary. TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Public Realm Mobility solutions may be integrated in Gibbs Street Station is bordered by the historic Lair Hill District and Park to the east,and natural Terwilliger Parkway to the west.While there is limited an area set aside for stormwater needs, A •lffil systems buildings or hardscaped plaza. development opportunity near to the station, pedestrian trails connect OHSU, Terwilliger Blvd,and the station to opportunity sites further east,including developable mixed-use blocks created by the SW Naito Parkway Main Street Project and Ross Island Bridgehead.This is identified as the Kelly Focus area in See Chapter 4.72 for a complete list of mobility partnering opportunities. the Barbur Concept Plan. 98 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 5.5 Marquam Hill Connector Shriners Hospital for Children Marquam Hill is home to Oregon Health&Science -r % I Pedestrian University(OHSU),Veterans Administration of Portland,the Sam © Crossing at New Ramp&Staircase Shriners Hospital,residences and supporting businesses, * ckson Physician's Station down to SW Gibbs St and attracts over 18,000 employees,patients,students Hall Pavilion2 and residents each day from all around the region.The Marquam Hill Southwest Corridor Light Rail will include a r Kohler Connector Plazaetot g ProjectO� Pavilion Aeria am Aerial Tram Uam1,0Cor�e f +, connection from the MAX station at Barbur Boulevard / and Gibbs Street to Marquam Hill.This short distance up ,� 8tatio itee- f the steep hill requires a safe,accessible connector to help 0 Parking ,� -/"----....°-----4111111111111111.111111111111.111111a ` 0 _ OHSU RGarage !\� Ili move people from the station to Marquam Hill destinations. : `_ 0 Hospital \ s ".... .%. ., ,,„...., �. �k :�Casey s,� rw� Compared with existing bus service to Marquam Hill,a Hattie \Eye , , mechanical connection between the Gibbs Station and �_, ResearchCenter /li ECEC In3`ti,�tj+' - s OHSU t.�r . ----- Terwilliger Parkway will improve travel times to Marquam �1,=\ SW Trails#1 �d Expansion 4ts\ # u Hill destinations from both the north and the south, have ,s•`..4/ • ;.' I Parking 0 �' lower operating costs and CO2 emissions,and will provide ,_1, •e� I garage 0 Multimodal Hub capacity for thousands of additional daily riders. s...... ........ OHSU Existing and Planned Improvements © co n _ OHSU Pedestrian and Accessibility Improvements Trails(SW Trails#1 shown as dashed line) 8 Elevators HosvA pi , d• Ira Bike Circulation x _ 77-: A. Bus Circulation Figure 5.5.1 Oregon Health&Sciences University(OHSU)Existing and Planned Improvements p Bus Stop SYNAGOGUE Q New/Enhanced Signal In order to reduce impacts to historic homes and parks in the South Portland Historic District,the structure formerly used as :f;: Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project Improvements a synagogue by Congregation Ahavath Achim will likely need to be removed.TriMet purchased the synagogue at the request = Marquam Hill Connector of the Congregation in 2018,and the Congregation does not object to the removal of the synagogue. Moving forward,the project team will work with local stakeholders,including the Jewish community and the neighborhood,to explore ways of OHSU Improvements commemorating the unique features and history of the structure as part of the station area. Further design may identify Terwilliger partnerships and opportunities for adaptive reuse of the building outside of the project scope. Parkway Tram co eParkwayTram n Southwest Corridor SW Naito ParkwayMain Street/ Light Rail Project South Portland/ Lair Hill Ross Island Bridgehead Project \ South Waterfront South Waterfront Marquam Hill Gibbs St Greenway To Q Homestead Connector Station- --___— Terwillige 0 0 o SW Trails#1 0 Darley Hooley ?N� Tram Blvd - F` Bridge Station a.. .............,.................. ...... Barbur Blvd Pkwy ` Q Q Pkwy J 1-5 / Moody Bond Willamette Ave St River Figure 5.5.2 Pedestrian connections and improvements between the South Waterfront and OHSU Marquam Hill campus(approximately 1 mile) 99 INCLINED ELEVATOR An inclined elevator has been selected as the preferred connector choice. Choosing the right connector involved multiple phases of robust public - engagement and technical review. Of all the connector options explored,the `:• ` inclined elevator received the most public support,and was found to have the �'`` least impact on Terwilliger Parkway. '� , An inclined elevator works similar to a standard elevator but provides ''`' t .::: . .. I. : horizontal and vertical movement.Two elevator cabs,each with a capacity of T.. 40 people,will run on parallel tracks to efficiently move people up and down the ri ' v steep slope between OHSU and Gibbs Street Station. '• ;� _ -14 -. A trip in the elevator will take about 60 seconds. From the top of the inclined � ~ 'rF ��< elevator,at Terwilliger Parkway and Campus Drive,an accessible pathway :j — will connect to elevators within the OHSU campus. Riders will also be able to `' �a access Line 8-Jackson Park/NE 15th Ave here,which provides frequent,door- x . to-door service to many Marquam Hill destinations. Z• Ongoing design of the inclined elevator will require close coordination between - ! Marquam Hill stakeholders including OHSU,Portland Parks&Recreation, :• •<� Bueau of Environmental Services, Portland Water Bureau, Friends of Terwilliger , � '' -__ and the neighboring community. Ownership,operations and maintenance of the inclined elevator willbe determined during the engineering phase. Figure 5.5.3 view from inside the inclined elevator,looking east toward Gibbs Street Station and the plaza below. . t bill HsTjullilvigre-mr; ,.... - .: , l„_-_ MARQUAM � '' .A s .. }` '.: " HILL - ., .. `' ' r .. % ..: . • ' Aix -71`.,..r; - 7--' . . Rik A .1 .., Lit- glr'F' 1 ii rr WILLIGER?ARKWAM CONNECTOR ��R -,, .:-- - - -. - - _. T'T CIE.45STREEr ' 4, 44_ylON .y .. ,:i 111 .' Figure 5.5.4 Bird's eye view of the Marquam Hill Connector Figure 5.5.5 View from the western terminus of the inclined elevator,which ends at SW Terwilliger Blvd. 100 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 1- ,ur .`` f lA1JJu' I. �J 5.6 Barbur- Naito Street Network ,- �••,,. tl \ i 1� li r, `--Zl l -� \:_—_-.±--: 1-405 Naito-Sheridan intersection n SW Naito Pkwy improvements from SW Barbur The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project design 1L r� �. and connection to SW Kelly Blvd to SW Harrison St include sidewalks, substantiallyreconfigures the SW Barbur Blvd and 'Fcl i�.c\':. 9 H. iii r St to be improved to facilitate � / signalized intersections with crosswalks, SW Naito Parkway intersection,creating an at-grade - , I' ti' SW Caruthers St ] access to SW Kelly Ave and protected bikeways,lane reconfiguration and I'D..'",. ., Z7"•. Ross Island Bridge streetscape improvements intersection in place of the existing tunnel alignment, of ./�,„`��' 4 D'ti SW Sheridan St � �� resulting in improvements for people walking and biking. . -- I�1' ., 1 • —— `4 _ l u Naito Parkway/Ross n-? i��! a l i ,, �I Island Bridgehead Early visioning by the community is also underway for *a�o� c, �o,r�- m i r� � slang ments will the SW Naito Parkway Main Street and Ross Island o 'f. ^`- v L�� :-� i SSW Hooker St will 3 ¢,. include bridgehead Bridgehead,a partner project with various street design I • a �r ' . ramp reconfiguration �, connect to Naito from concepts for a"Main Street”including improved pedestrian a�. 1 0 _ Q into a multimodal street the west side of Naito 3 c", • ''\network connected with and bicycle facilities.Together,these projects will rebuild a z Naito Parkway and SW '[,�-f SW Meade Stlocal street connections,and coordinate pedestrian andtri_gime_.,_...-- .. - , -- N , . `1 �' Kell Ave bicycle facilities to provide greater resident access to 7 co I `�� ' S W Hooker St • Pii e Gibbs Street Station and promote land uses that contribute �� _yl� y • i, 9G Improved 1-5 ramp to a healthy,connected community. • ~" '.1 . ,. P j;/connection from 1-5 NB to 1{ . SW Porter St will connect = ti y SW Kelly Ave to Naito with right-in and _______Ir--------; SW Porter St �.. ,,^�, Or. o right-out connections 1 •4: 1 5 y Noods Sty [ ] " ' I I jNew street configuration = �: , ' .• r • removes highway-era/' /T l // SW Grover St ] .. ramps and merge lanes 4 / -' �/ I - - _ . '. .II and replaces with arterial - •/ - 1I. streets with signalized - -�2 ] SW�ibbs St 5;k._, U ',11 f- _- =—_ f —ii ]\'` _� _�_r y 1 intersections • .% 1 _ New signalized r r=ria SW Gibbs St will connect the - • SW Whitakei St r-intersections on Naito 1 G 1 LJI i Marquam Hill Connector,the 1 • 1;will occur at SW Gibbs _----t_-. I.- light rail station at Barbur/ r- - I'_St,the two new street r i—) Gibbs to Naito Parkway and i SW Curry St connections from the • P •4e - the Darlene Hooley pedestrian ' . Ross Island Bridge and c---,r —:_- ,--- -.�� bridge,creating an active i , SW Hooker St �. ! --;:, transportation circulation i. i u + `" I _ route from South Waterfront to SW Whittaker St is 1J, I • 6' [�� Terwilliger Parkway and OHSU : ' ' a•'being evaluated for I Lt„1I I r Lasignalization —_. L-"' L F New or Enhanced i.� II u ��]{ • Project Elements : • • 1 i .r�i fa—r . Potential for regional and � +� Roadway i local cut through traffic�Fure 5.6.2 I+ ;:- Sidewalk will need to be managed I 1 SW Barbur/Naito and balanced with the nil `— Q New/Enhanced Signal Ii intersection to be rebuilt ,; a need for local access to f Gated Crossing m as at-grade signalized and from South Portland 1 11n Crosswalk o, intersection-see Figure neighborhoods 5.6.2 i 11111 Enhanced Ped. 3 UI ;-r `�0r � • `' Crossing t oi' p 1 �` Q Project Feature y . '' �-,I - n _. tr:: .. S .- 1 I.L_,eiLl cr- 1,-." .-S,'Bili . ',j, i i rn r--1 F.7 Figure 5.6.1 DRAFT Barbur Naito Street Network Area Plan 0' 200400' 800' 101 - j..__ i I I INTERSECTION FEATURES 3 ---- - Q1� p. l VA Raised protected bike lane Limit of Southwest SW Cu �St Corridor Light Rail Project 0 Buffered bike lanes Vi ' t' Improvements 4,... .. ® At-grade signalized intersection O I - _ -. ® Local -access only on SW Pennoyer St 0 0 05 Stair and ramp access for improved pedestrian ;�� ' ) connection ir. a © Coordination with City of Portland's SW Naito Parkway Front and Curry s Main Street Project-protected bikeway,final design to Community z be determined \ ‘-} Garden SW Curry St to SW Pennoyer St connection to be determined 0 ® Pedestrian connection to SW Gaines St under study g0 Midblock crossing at SW Condor Ave 0 [ il - ----_______ m I SW Pennoyer St N • • • • I/ i • • '..\WIC .7. G ••• i it , ; •�• n • 00 �- 0 • 0 00 `, Platform ——— Project Boundary ��bwi,, 0 Landscape = Track 8 Potential Stormwater Crossing Gate 111," 0 SW Baines St Treatment _--_ Existing Right of Way 0 New/Improved New/Improved N� Sidewalk Roadway .J 6 I , 0 Ne n/Enhanced Shared Transitway g Pedestrian Ballasted Track a i Crossing 0 Potential Bike Parking emi Dioi( , ,. , \ I ® Potential Bus Stop 0• 25' 50' 1W' A , -.-„, Figure 5.6.2 DRAFT Barbur-Naito Intersection Plan;Design is conceptual and wit be lurlher developed through community engagement and technical design efforts 102 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 5.7 Hamilton Street Station i . - _ -_---ir_ _ &Ilia.) 1,800 Projected Daily Trips - — _ pr /7/// 0 43 Percent Walk — ' �I` � !! IJi Q 46 Percent Transfer - --= 1 i - 012 Percent Auto Bike o Use: _ +J: The Hamilton Street Station is located near the South - --- _-__ __ ._ =_i I f. . ___-- __ Portland community hub,between SW Bancroft St and SW ,--- _+ .,-...11" �'' : Hamilton St.Safer,easier pedestrian connections across SW == ,+ I.. = Barbur Blvd will help link the Homestead neighborhood uphill _- -01101111116 ' ' _- and the South Portland neighborhood downhill.The station will serve as a major transfer point for local bus lines. i l .��' � 1- I _- PROJECT BENEFITS - = Y y iiifflIII Ii 1 - i_. 0 MOVE AND CONNECT PEOPLE �.- = - -: ' - mi, •t 111111 _ Ilin ,• -;_ . • Two new and improved pedestrian connections ArM -P'- lir_ :--- I.IL Ilk- across SW Barbur Blvd and improved crossing along — _ SW Corbett Ave, improving access to John's Landing = - - 1 neighborhood -- _-j - `—_ �` • Raised protected bike lanes and upgraded sidewalks - _ _ �` — •along SW Barbur Blvd -- = _a , µ • Planned connections to bus lines 43,54 and 96- note:bus lines 44 and 56 in shared transitway do not Raised protected bike lanes and _• Streetscape improvements will A mix of existing and future uses stop at Hamilton Street Station 4 wide sidewalks along SW Barbur introduce a climate-appropriate i & are easily and safely walkable and Blvd create a more complete , plant palette and improve the urban bikable from the station • Optimized SW Bancroft St realignment for truck access multimodal network tree canopy on SW Barbur Blvd 0 MAINTAIN AND CREATE EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES Figure 5.7.1 DRAFT Hamilton Street Station Vision • Supports the vision of the Barbur Concept Plan • Access to South Portland and Homestead DESIGN VALUES:APPLYING COMMUNITY FEEDBACK IN ONGOING DESIGN neighborhoods • Hamilton Street Station to have pedestrian and bicycle amenities that help improve station access and stitch together • Access to Terwilliger Parkway the neighborhood on each side of SW Barbur Blvd 0 PRESERVE AND RESTORE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT • Final design of station platform and bus stops to provide safe crossing of SW Barbur Blvd that facilitates high • Enhanced street tree canopies and stormwater volumes of bus to light rail transfer activity treatment along SW Barbur Blvd • Continue to coordinate with local stakeholders on the Bancroft alignment and Bancroft/Corbett intersection • Design station area in coordination with development plans on surrounding properties 103 PROJECT SCOPEiiiik f • Hamilton Street Station and light rail infrastructure Terwilliger +i _ Barbur streetscape • ! . • SW Barbur Blvd bike and pedestrian improvements Parkway With raised protected bike • Pedestrian staircase up to SW View Point Terrace ► `� Pedestrian connection/DI /4lanes on both sides i ; J j _ and SW Hamilton St to SW View Point Terrace • , 4 * Irim • New signals at SW Hamilton St/SW Corbett Ave and 1110b �. _ _ , i C SW Bancroft St/SW Corbett Ave intersections [ I Figure 5.7.4 , u m dry i i iii ./Mk / • SW Bancroft Blvd realignment ' i i I SW Bancroft St ir b • Short-term and long-term bike parking `l —SWBancrofi.— realignment I [� i i • Revised bus stop routing and stop locations ' :***...% lr r Staircase and'ramp to . 1/ : •-• I . Renaissance j i. SW View Point�i errace :,.� School of Arts 1 x. t 1'' L` , i and Sciences _ - Hamilton L__ '`i p CJri .yD ;onomunity • ,'Do i I el.. e �❑P' Counseling ••'� e6`• _ 1 0 1- l� L'o i : Conte '•f•, •.1 I •- Viewpoint of station vision rendering _—,� - -- P " �•'•• F. ••; ;' _ } 6 New or Enhanced Project Elements Existing Assets CE in n �,... •: .. 31 �`��m .. a� Roadway Multifamily r ":'• ..•y�`"" lep _ •- • Seventh-Day l r=.1•173 a / .: Sidewalk Employment • ' Adventist Church at 11 Q New/Enhanced Signal Retail Q ' • •.� Barbur streetsca e with .9 C=] Gated Crossing Existing Trail P i� i NM Crosswalk raised protected bike rt +i,' ] p C rt--- lanes '� Signal at lanes on both sides •t 11 p-04114111 Enhanced Ped. � mayor road • '� y ' Crossing Crosswalk(sMil ) SW Slavin Rd - -. ,00' Zoo' 400 A Project Feature at major road • � j _ i ....— i ,.4 Figure 5.7.2 DRAFT Hamilton Street Station overview ROW �� —� ROW AI r I I ee , I 0 to t i ... t ., . / ,,_A // 'Aa o s o s 11 ' X01 00 s ° o 0 0 I CO1 l t t ea Sidewalk Raised Protected Travel Lane Travel Lane Shared Transitway Light Rail Platform Shared Transitway Travel Lane Travel Lane Raised Protected Sidewalk Bike Lane Bike Lane Figure 5.7.3 DRAFT Hamilton Street Station Cross Section 0' 4' 8' 16' 104 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT jr L, H '1 r / o STATION FEATURES L77. 7.- , 1461/ ' 1111-111P 1114 Q Center platform I 02 Pedestrian walkway to platform with barrier railing i IE 0 -„ IIII i/ I - ® Raised protected bike lanes �� ® Pedestrian stairs and ramp to SW Bancroft St SW Bancroft Si priw.,441 �0 / 5y 0 SW Bancroft St realigned to SW Barbur Blvd s / O �' O © Shared transitway '' ' (7 ® Potential systems building,location subject to change rte'' / i . s 4 7. .... _ „ r.) 660i' sof' t. / i O l_ 0 4.111til*. I''' n .. v i ,/i 1 J L__i _,_, / I, v 1 v fit° �es) PBS Conference ] oa Center Ii Community �� Counseling Cente .0 I � / Corbett Hill : < © "rf, Wellness Center f 1 / a _ Platform ——— Project Boundary © ' Landscape Track r� _ Potential Stormwater Crossing Gate '6 :est Friend * Treatment • ---- Existing Right-of-Way /// ' Veterinary New/Improved �,‘ 06,...4,..1 edical cent• _ Sidewalk New/Improved �. � :� � Roadway �" �`��, Signal Enhanced Shared Transitway /,,, � SW Hamilton St Ballasted Track 0 � Pedestrian Crossing • Potential Bike Parking �'' 0 ® Potential Bus Stop �.-�" 0' 25550' 100' A r Figure 5.7.4 DRAFT Hamilton Street Station Plan;Design is conceptual and will be further developed through community engagement and technical design efforts 105 STATION ACCESS PROJECTS ,s Z.- �i \ �� -0- Hamilton Sidewalks and Bikeway ror• 1 4 • • a I r Q � 1 •• i , . . „ . a 14 ii 1 Ni "11,!- . ,..., i "41 dr iii\ CD PARTNER-LED PROJECTS 44 ii g� ilkf# � wg�� . , I 4, pi 4.1 -0- SW Slavin Rd Connector(City of Portland TSP) — !' , ;� SWBancoftSt IP K� 'Vim r" • t Y Y ,,-_,-.. , *. .• 0 Aph i ' / (121-- Aki 'N % ' • - ■ �— mr+I I ••i i 1 i . (I # _ •_ - •_ ..n r % • .Hamilton . • •�..,, . • _ ■ .© Blinfil A i !Dorfl i — SW_aamonSt • . .6_�-ii� � r• = r a IN 7 / A F � ' ' ji ma imr) O ni 0' 100200' 400' A . . . ,.._. id 1 k .ei Figure 5.7.5 Hamilton Street Station Access Projects and Potential Partnering 1/2 Mile Station Walkshed 100/200/400'from Station FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES Based on station area context, project partners will explore the following: There is estimated demand within the station area for the following private mobility services: New Transit-Oriented Places Adapting the Right-of-Way Mobility solutions can be integrated into Future mobility solutions may be located ® Electric Bike/Scooter Share buildings at the ground floor,in a parking along the curb or along the sidewalk within garage or associated landscaped area. ' ,- 7 . , a public or private street-outside of the 0 On-Demand Ridehailing project boundary. TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Adapting Existing Places Property owners may work with the city Hamilton Street Station is bordered by both multi-dwelling residential and commercial mixed use zoning,resulting in neighborhood-scale uses �_ and mobility providers on solutions such nm� as in a parking lot or landscaped area. and activities-particularly along SW Corbett Ave. Major pedestrian/bike improvements and developable parcels along Barbur Blvd could encourage street-level uses facing SW Barbur Blvd as well.This is identified as the Hamilton Focus area in the Barbur Concept Plan. See Chapter 4.72 for a complete list of mobility partnering opportunities. 106 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 5.8 Capitol Highway Bridge Replacement ,A S. 'E` ! f:. •.,.t... {.• a - -74—CL .. .� .fix ��r • � /y �. 1 3i ' 3.: • ,� $ � yy - -'.... f�y4 _€ j+a-:Fr *`a: +� j ''�Ayhy %• yh t t`.`Z y 1 R " ti. � � m'Cd "S Y y • • ->}� t' r`�" r ri' G _le • r5 ; r' s: --ql • 3 a • �. x`Af v. a fw & i...“5•;",,. „4�s t ;yY$r SAY � 44r r �� [ i�r- P, 4, t,'�'�, ••'� r• ii $ v , G •-•,,,..,:: .. .1`ia A ...,5k• .S �i� •rL • s �'r F ¢' r�e r .gyp '.aiC._-c -,....„.4.,..-.. "�` f `� v - • s . .4,-.07,,-,.S �` k� '� i-`! t.a 1...9 - ,,4 '`r :..r,''''..,:./.. 6-4,,,!-•,...,,,-: per as. s .. � '•.•:::i.- ^''.','' ' ,.. A. j 4 ,lr i, - j •f r mow ., A'."•-• <4 '. / d P' J Y. 'fP k Y •,40.„ :I R°l.g �v°• r; - _ • ifi -7 s ",•",,V..:.'f�`, r, i.. ,'. ' '?!; 4,-,..r..1,..,,,-;, °e" !a ' 1.1!'2 q• 1_ rPl " J4." .•:. ..r ' r f hJ �4 'Nk ,°+' `.�� f? ' d b% • •N::''''''''' .b fes."":4•�/,,.' ' t.- s r I�'4, . i-�, 1 �: '. ,r 4..,...,;44,,..; ,' ' . i.0. A,:-*,--• t.� y, %. a� t • - f tea. �-R. �, . � 1_ �f .4.4-G. S.,',4i'.•• 1.ya �_- • \ -4".. f% �'"` k _ l'-'tz ,-,44,'-."4 '.' _.#,r te, J "�� s a 5rfir, µ , M �� r °r, • W •'''''''n ,�:'.�z� � r s°a1 f''x. ,� � 6 r?a�'•�� ^f�'$ :,.-',.•'.-..''',!..' � "+$'Q• 'AsC �m 1a �� l d' ` x• ' 5g r s �� y aaY e s wfp .. '...1.4...:-.'',:' -�, • 1 '.. ' • • _ s S'''''-• L. lr J { • • i'!� ,r.i. a-•; r' . •- S • • ''''.''.".;,:"..,.%',..,,,V.•t'• / r� aii • { ? .r W"'-' .�,r rye ,;.&//''''''''' am `.�, y a : �k <f Lr._ - ' t • } •f-',-71. 'A • •• • yy• ! Y s .�- �. .,, of \ _d 4.•'..•.::•4e..",..• • i. t 'A 4'a- k •F. i s 4 rr. rs • "• _A6 •,:x '� -C. 4- . : •� p . f i '} -� F a5 _ rec'� tom' ` ( 1: h : - 9 constructed ` � .� / � ` � k: • �-: � i f � SW Capitol Hwy grid a(Re w �. >� Newbury Viaduct + x .'� :.f - _e'+f:�'y-Ya6t, ', �'n (Reconstructed) d t`. .,y, �`,:. is, t. M4r.. ,r4f i ✓/� `y- r fi se•g, x3° ,f�rrf-. m n ;'."%�. • • L, , • .y,.7�.:' l �[a'�..j�;' �, f'.'fp'µ b r ` .. h' N . j \'' . '''',„.•-'..:,'1 - y'',--"?-,:,..,,,,..,,r,' ,. 1:'•.,'•'''t,i'''' '•- • • 1� c r Frif 'l s- . 4'tf �C krr . r':; •.iF,q. , % ryid4.rs6 .iyA -. iJ ,ti _ s '.... yF0/ ip--✓ y, K ��,y , :T i. ' .f � '''. • • • 4, .. • 4.' . -...k,'• ' -.",,,..,:•'• :ilk....•• •i.::• Si, ..• -5,• .•, . ••tt,_ • • • Figure 5.8.1 DRAFT Capitol Highway bridge and Newbury Viaduct reconstruction aerial overview ,7. ,I Ili le 107 5.9 Viaducts Replacement .++�+ ..,- i„. "' - Newbury and Vermont Viaducts are located within the Terwilliger Blvd`h = = -II r! . Hamilton • _,,,it Woods segment of SW Barbur Blvd. Constructed in 1934, Parkway •u' ` fW Hamilton St - • • "1'1'4 ell ' these structures are still in service,withstanding far '-� iia _'I 4 �- ' greater traffic than they were intended for,and lacking14111ea ;1 - =- a facilities for people walking and biking.The Southwest ' rIllI +.. I �L . Corridor Light Rail Project has committed to replacing the '� .1 ►. il .1 r I ►) timber supported viaducts with new seismically-sound � 'Q - - 14:�� "'. �,r�� , structures designed to carry four auto lanes, light rail,and it �' "{ improved bike and pedestrian facilities,creating a better I �Y •1 �� 4/ WI` " experience for all modes. ,,. .., •'�'"�; >r The two viaducts are adjacent to natural areas of George "�'It . •, •-' A , 3 C Z Himes Park and span environmental protection overlay 17/14.09:••it. * •�, - �^ }� :` Al> zones(P Zone),and important wildlife corridors.To protect "4.•'-`,1 `j"- i ,� Fr.: � these critical wildlife passages,the viaduct design and CU �.err. _ t � -I. r i , IMO! O construction methods will minimize impact to the sensitive t* •.r .�; x+'r area,maintaining permeability of this rich and vital east- r" {; ' '��'. ...lo ;t a ,r west habitat corridor and enhancing the view opportunities. . -4,+ *,. 'rs-t f f ; • • 77. � z r wI G tet. we. tet -r A:- - , - 1,1 di me 6 '. ,. . ;-.6 , '''. "—:."` : ..y. .. ..1- ' :'''''' - i ••• .-I. } '71 • _ i.:SW Capitol H - =I Et 43.-t:., Newbury ViaductttI e �,i12s�' `"e 41 ie -- inlim Wilson High School I�a•w,e} e, FA' • ��jf•1i+'.71 ji •S•,TI Figure 5.9.1 Newbury Viaduct(Image Source Structurae) , Mir- ,r a- 11010 +4 0.1 17r,n.. I., , 4 '.,..1,t:....7_:?.-.,,,,,,. -.r -; ' • g Vermont Viaduct a .1.:.,yyr;.: 1r��. g i +ar■rar : 41.p.4. . Figure 5.9.5 '„.r1.:,P ..: — l� a.- Sm-; .. '°_.- 14.%, I,a a`+� i i . - . .rRfr'►r..:0 ,l.;y! .:-�. _ - - -0 .i• + • + a ■ :'■ .r,. !. +%i•+laUI w _ 40 • , v * r'�/ k ItL .w ►F,: ;‘.1.41116.4..11 ■ •,s'f Willamette :`#�w r ; e {..R 1 i+ f. • 7" •Fiw I. Park IOW ,�. P ( a .. e"rfa "a j + .` I `% • _ .�' i' Y}'`4.w 4s* ti 0.1`n+ IT .hF�h'F . i..� � ,. Ar !ll 1 K•Nto:. 44�4,a. � y111i .' 1 jiy. •• * 'I.A t 1 ! ,.� r. :�•'tl # = M �' i�`:. .Ri11iI t'11111 6 ✓ r r.a i yf ayr�r 1 �+,: T '..w-a�: -� .r r . y ,-00 Z y_ f _ • r+' 4/....l.1. s ■■ J is a i+. '1.-.7 • `• ,i ,, ,. - - , Ac: 0. ......amm _ Figure 5.9.2 Vermont Viaduct(Image Source:Structurae) Figure 5.9.3 Location of major viaducts along SW Barbur Blvd,between Hamilton Street and 13th Avenue Stations 0' 150300' 600' A 108 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT —; --- ._6 '�: 7'r L.;.,,i,-.1.--- ---7---:-..- T"'_ _ - _ ;---1"-•-•L---_ /- -� Nip 'Vs _ ----. ,',fie Y„'d,.0 • 411111 -- . .. it — - ...•--. _ nM &°f �' .. r ,' fir rY F. ' • � irk r �. :r..,��'�1{ � �_n•' -. - . _ ' 48', .r3 _ sF. X1.1 L _ Hifi ,' '.` • ....--ill • , _ -�' _. .; c .' -:sly'. ;'r 4, 4� �_ • r la Figure 5.9.4 Bird's eye view of Harbor Structure,which is similar to the viaduct replacements(Image Sources:TriMet Flickr,Victor von Salza Flickr) cthIlh. A C \1 0 r \_1 Or ,\Ir O o v ,\ '� 0 1,�ii, 0 _ 1L Ai P. \n 707( - \n 707( ii \ ii 1� Oi° ' ( ),, Imo( )� I00 _ 00 00 0 00 r r SidewRaised Travel Travel Center Running Light Rail Trackway Travel Travel Raised Protected Lane Lane Lane Lane Protected °r "°°r” Bike Lane Bike Lane Figure 5.9.5 Typical draft cross-section through SW Barbur Blvd viaducts 6 DESIGN CONCEPTS : OUTER PORTLAND 1 1 0 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT DESIGN CONCEPTS:OUTER PORTLAND 109 6.1 Project Highlights 111 6.2 Moving Around Outer Portland 112 Neighborhood Access 116 6.3 13th Avenue Station 118 6.4 19th Avenue Station 122 6.5 30th Avenue Station 126 6.6 Barbur Transit Center Station 130 6.7 Barbur Transit Center Public Opportunity Site 135 6.8 Street Improvements:South of Barbur Transit Center137 6.9 53rd Avenue Station 138 53rd Ave Streetscape 142 6.10 PCC Connection 144 111 6 Design Concepts: Outer Portland 6.1 Project Highlights r-: ,o; The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project will help transform SW Barbur Blvd (• F . Ter Iliger and nearby connections to achieve community aspirations.The project area is Par way envisioned to be easily accessible,welcoming,vibrant and safe for everyone. SW Barbur Blvd/99W is one of Portland's busiest and most important streets .• . connecting between Downtown Portland,Tigard, neighborhood centers and cities across the region.The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project increases the capacitySW of SW Barbur Blvd to move more people through the corridor,enhances safety SW Vermont St • Georg: Nimes for all modes,and creates comfortable pedestrian access for people walking and : P'rk biking.As a publicly owned parcel,the Barbur Transit Center serves as a public ; Ste ens opportunity site forpossible future transit-oriented development. a Gabriel ural, pp y p SW .. Natural -a C, . . .PSI . . . . . . . . . . . . •C`u'ster. PROJECT BENEFITS c., ' SW Tr:ils#4 Park „ °�°'u .n Park •cx MOVE AND CONNECT PEOPLE SW Multnomah Blvd 13t Burlingam •• Intersection improvements and new crosswalks help people safely cross . S•. ° ParkUTH SW Barbur Blvd . 19th BUR INGAME Woods o Spring • An enhanced streetscape on SW 53rd Ave helps improve the daily Memorial : o Garden ° • \o commute for PCC Sylvania students,faculty and staff Park Park,.•,.., i' co •• 30th - • Significant •enhancements to bike facilities along SW Barbur Blvd north of CRESTWOOD • Cl, MARKHAM < op � „es ss Barbur Transit Center,improves the safety and comfort of biking through the corridor SW Taylors Ferry Rd . . Barbur Transit Center a MAINTAIN AND CREATE EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES .... . ..' •44Existing l 5PedestrianBridge " /ORTLAND SW Huber St SW Trails#5 ▪ A transit-rich and more people-friendly SW Barbur Blvd helps realize the community vision in the Barbur Concept Plan •�� n WEST • Maricara Tryon Creek NaturalArea State Five stations along SW Barbur Blvd improve transit access to a range of •• Natural Area affordable,mixed apartment,single family,and multifamily housing for „„a: 53r� PARK Southwest Corridor Light Rail people of diverse economic backgrounds =•-53rd Streetscape to PCC Q PRESERVE AND RESTORE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT - a Greenspaces Portlan • _� _ Destinations • Improvements and additions to stormwater infrastructure will contribute Commue College- c) Road(size indicates scale) to improved ecological health of streams feeding into the Willamette River Sylvania Regional bike connection • Entirely new street tree canopy along SW Barbur Blvd,addresses the lack . Regional trail connection of street trees that exist today and strengthens the Westside Wildlife .. ' Corridor Improved streetscape Public opportunity site (Potential Future TOD) Figure 6.1.1 Project Overview- Outer Portland 0' 1600' 112 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 6.2 Moving Around Outer Portland - . r �' ACCESSING THE STATION ` L ry conditions,and steeptopography. r_ 'S' t" Yom_ • Along SW Barbur Blvd,a majority of transit riders will ± ,.. �^� :. ,- t; arrive at stations by walking from nearby residential • Limited locations where pedestrians and cyclists can . ' x .1:.--' neighborhoods. For neighborhoods south of SW cross SW Barbur Blvd and I-5. a3.., ; , Barbur Blvd and the 1-5,walking access to stations • Lack of connection into Portland's broader cycling - s� will be limited to streets that cross the highway:SW network. - - -�''-. _ • _ . . Terwilliger Pkwy,SW 19th Ave,SW Spring Garden ' -,. � _ ` ;` ' 9 Y p 9 , <. Blvd,SW 26th Way,and the Barbur Transit Center y % . _ • „ ,� " - - Y The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project will improve -, ... • pedestrian overcrossing. ;, , y g. - �" ' ��r';,:it S, these conditions by reducing distances between „a • Riders will transfer from light rail to local bus routes. crosswalks, upgrading adding protected intersections A "' __*. At 13th Avenue and 19th Avenue Stations,riders will for cyclists.An enhanced SW Barbur Blvd streetscape 'j :; ,: �� transfer to routes heading south toward Lewis&Clark reconstructs aging overpass structures on SW 26th Way _i 44 College and northwest. and SW Multnomah Blvd,and improves bikeways and = �'. .r,. �� •v. i,_ sidewalks on streets to the light rail alignment. 7 ,,•.� < • % - ate: • Located near existing commercial and office adjacentg g •jii, i„.;'-ii. -- -. _ sa - r c• ...:s . ? 't • areas,30th Avenue Station also provides access to , nei hborhood amenities and supports futuregrowth. Seamless access improvements require close coordination , "^ �- g pp between all project partners.Southwest Corridor Station Y '-. ~ • Barbur Transit Center will continue to serve as a 4 Access planning has been developed in concert with v •.* • 4 regional transit facility. Future station design (to be Portland's Transportation System Plan(TSP),Southwest a -• i addressed in Final Engineering)will improve this in Motion (SWIM)strategyand Safe Routes to School • il area's multimodal characteristics.The station will Barbur Transit Center program.A list of partner-led Station Access projects - xw k„,.,, ,,;...A • include Park&Ride spaces and accommodate people for improving pedestrian and bicycle access in Outer '.ft., _�, : -^ -.1 arriving by bus and bike.This location also presents �.F w . � ; Portland is on the followin page. Note that not all projects "4• •.ter r� a significant opportunity to enhance passenger currentlyhave associated budgets and schedules.Some iv- ri' ;. ='.•' IA waiting areas,pick-up and drop-off areas,on-demand g * .. ".. of these projects may be constructed in conjunction with rideshare and other forms of micro-mobility such as the light rail project,while others will be constructed after electric bikes and/or scooters. opening day. illiNt _,..r_....511r-Ila iffill At:. _. E • A fixed shuttle is being considered at the 53rd Ave ', Station to provide service to PCC-Sylvania,as well as The design concepts included in this chapter show a small +. �- 4�;. S ` ,,,y WI a Park&Ride. area plan for each location with all projects included in ;- y,'•4\ ,\ the current Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project funding. J. ;` ` ' �!! • For each station, project partners are exploring the A functional plan shows how each station contributes to . best locations where passenger drop-off can be provided. access for walking,biking,driving,and transit,and how the ;: � station fits into its existing context. ;:,. l IMPROVING TRANSIT ACCESS , • , •�• } �4 , z,� F + An inventory of bicycle and pedestrian conditions on - - �. blocks adjacent to each station has identified the following ■ • • �� 1 • . 1 challenges in Outer Portland: ' �""'."' °:,,..;,i . vzi Barbur Boulevard la • Local streets lacking sidewalks,unpaved street - 4 + 4 OUTER PORTLAND. The three-mile bikeshed reflects 2035 STATION RIDERSHIP the boundary of study for bicycle access to transit. • Source:Metro,2019 [ #s 13TH -- ` Gibbs 2,300 Projected Daily Trips41) �, • O 63 Percent Walk 91 - O N. Southwest • 37 Percent Transfer Bike Use: Hills < Hamilton 0 Percent Auto Medium ��' '_ ` T,--) .`• 19TH • South The half-mile walkshed around each �� 2,000 Projected Daily Trips 4!:0 , r. station defines what destinations '. - Waterfront 00 87 Percent Walk r can be walked to in 10 minutes. Hillsda,l�- •► CI 12 Percent Transfer Bike Use: _ `y i -___ 1 Percent Auto Low The dashed catchment area reflects ,-• ,,,r. Multnomah .--,•-_:4....._ `± where people would likely bike to '1 ,-:'—'---, orfrom a station. Village 13th ' _,- p . I■ ► .1N1+';3- • (i) 30TH " ' --'/ Ashcreek 19th South ►1 \1 4,200 Projected Daily Trips ••. a �� r Burlingame ; ® 95 Percent Walk V�J.. I Marl�ltam `►` f e 0 Percent Transfer Bike Use: '. 30th 5 Percent Auto Metlium Cre)twood Q + ' r Barbur Transi#,�Cen �r L qtr r Q: West PortlanId I!J. ,,;yam :-{2 BARBUR TRANSIT CENTER Metzger 68th `- ' 53rd `Parlr ' -� 2,900 Projected Daily Trips '- f •', '� ',`- O 65 Percent Walk 4' - • 12 Percent Transfer Bike Use: • -- Far Southwest , 24 Percent Auto Lowj 1� ,' Elmhurst Hall :+�� BIKING TO THE STATION Although biking is not included in the ridership .1) 53RD calculations,stations will attract cyclists as future transit 2,400 Projected Daily Trips ! z. %, riders from the surrounding area,typically in a three-mile O 65 Percent Walk CO • range.Various factors may limit how far riders are likely CI 1 Percent Transfer Bike Use: - - to travel,including:viable streets for biking,terrain,rider 34 Percent Auto Low behavior,comfort,station proximity and direction of travel. TriMet and project partners will assess these factors to help prioritize investments and identify missing links across the corridor. A 'r- 114 STATION ACCESS AND PARTNER PROJECTS The following map shows the location and geographic syaPdv t Stationextent for Accesss Ional Projects.Southwest P Projects aredor highll highlighted( go that P�rti/iisoa/ey�y 0 caP,t°i NWy ii help to increase connectivity to light rail stations. Station access projects have advanced through the Shared SW Vermont St Hillsdale Investment Strategy are included in the FEIS, but not the project budget.These could be designed and built by the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project(TriMet), if other /. sources of funding are secured. O ''o ., r This map also includes relevant local projects led entirely Mer. ultnomah r by local jurisdictions.These projects will be coordinated SW Multnomah Blvd Village �0 with,and help to inform station area decisions.These 19th projects are planned,funded,designed and constructed ,,,," %..) by others,and are not part of the Southwest Corridor �� A. Light Rail Project. More information on these projects is - ® ® ■ available on the website of each project lead. ® f 10 South Ashcreek2 ,O Burlingame �` f� • :D Th � � ' //`L'Ot SW Taylors Ferry Rd ' .: / Markham _m Ali 7 fil Age -_.BarIur ransit Center Crestwood E ., I 1y St 0 53rd West Portland s�Pto°�a .� '"0 % Park ':kliliii_. Q m ti SW Stephenson St Fecty 0Far Southwest °°°es Figure 6.2.1 Station Access and Partner Projects 0' 10002000' 4000' A 115 STATION ACCESS PROJECTS — PARTNER-LED PROJECTS — O Terwilliger Bikeway a 26th Sidewalks and Bikeway 0 Completion of Bikeway Gaps along SW Terwilliger Blvd(City of Portland TSP) O Chestnut Bikeway ® 30th Sidewalks Spring Garden Sidewalk And Bikeway O 13th Sidewalks and Bikeway e Taylors Ferry Sidewalks and Bikeway O Improvements(City of Portland TSP) O Custer Sidewalks IiiI 40th Sidewalks and Bikeway O Multnomah Viaduct Safety Improvements(City of Portland TSP) O Custer Walk/Bike Bridge D Capitol Sidewalks and Bikeway SW 30th Ave/SW Hume St/SW 31st Ave O Capitol Hill Sidewalks and Bikeway e Luradel Walk/Bike Bridge 0 Sidewalk And Bikeway Improvements(City of Portland TSP) e 19th Bikeway ®i 53rd Walk/Bike Bridge O Inner SW Taylors Ferry Rd Safety Improvements m Troy Bikeway ® Pomona Sidewalks and Bikeway (City of Portland TSP) ® Spring Garden and Dolph Sidewalks and Bikeway ® Pasadena Sidewalks and Bikeway SW Capitol Hwy Corridor Improvements(City of 0 Portland TSP) ® 24th Sidewalks and Bikeway ® Barbur/PCC to Triangle Connection O SW Lesser Rd Sidewalk And Bikeway Improvements(City of Portland TSP) O Barbur Crossroads Safety Project (ODOT) 116 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT NEIGHBORHOOD ACCESS The following diagrams show the proposed vehicular I circulation for Outer Portland,which highlights possible SW Nevada Ct .. - traffic mitigations, new or modified signals and design of m intersections to support u-turns and turning movements ~ adjacent to the project alignment. New enhanced SW +_ pedestrian crossings will be added throughout the PI Bertha -g-i. 4J14. Fc project,significantly improving the pedestrian safety and Blvd �' crossing opportunities along the alignment. New enhanced ,•, h - lt.- pedestrian crossing treatment types will continue to be =Y '� explored as a valuable measure in providing increased = SW Custer Dr ` pedestrian safety and permeability across major streets. o > - �; P Additional crossings also benefit access to new and Q > < 13th improved bike facilities built by the project. N .� -i SW Moss St SW Evans St -* mar S SW Capitol Hill Rd �4 �o W Multnoma �, - . �` 11-5 hAve a, N �' .�� cp SW Hume St a' �, �, �. 19th SW Spring Garden St 4rs ,' + a SCALE:NOT TO SCALE SW Spring Garden St t y N LEGEND )' N II , 4 `��' l�f Existing MAX Station > � "' 0 Proposed Light Rail Station SW Dolph Ct ��\ 411' Allowable Turn Movements C ��a�ro In Re-routed Turn Movements — – c„ -0 il Possible Diversion Routes (TBD) '1-'6mEN igi • New Traffic Signal .�. Replaced/ Modified Traffic Signal Y 030th • New Enhanced Pedestrian-only Cros: SW Primrose St 7 ,,� New Gated Rail Crossing >4 — Proposed Road Closure SW Alice St t 111111.1 )QI. U-Turn Restricted '`24 SW Taylors Ferry Rd - _ . �� _ Note: Diagram does not indicate existing SW 35th Ave z �� 1-5 r signalized intersections to remain. Figure 6.2.2 Proposed Vehicular Circulation 117 = SWAlice St �� 8 SW 35th Ave �; 1-5 1 y. 0) <<y (ODOT's Barbur y day\O�e �� co Crossroads Safety - S N Project Re-routing) . ' had SW Taylors Ferry Rd �� A VQat& Barbur Transit Center 'S•6,e, $\\1d O S\IA$2: SW Huber St a -• M O� V) \\V Q0, < SCALE:NOT TO SCALE LEGEND 0) t..1 Existing MAX Station SW Dickinson St 0 Proposed Light Rail Station •SW Dickinson St i'r' Allowable Turn Movements 53rd Re-routed Turn Movements II -* Possible Diversion Routes (TBD) Par. y • New Traffic Signal • ie Replaced/ Modified Traffic Signal SW Pomona St • New Enhanced Pedestrian-only Cros: _ > C; New Gated Rail Crossing 1-5 NB abut savN • > — Proposed Road Closure W e �- ff. U-Turn Restricted Sco SW Capitol Hwy •T- LO Note: Diagram does not indicate existing N 0) signalized intersections to remain. Figure 6.2.3 Proposed Vehicular Circulation 118 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 6.3 13th Avenue Station 2,300 Projected Daily Trips0 �� " _ __ _-= ®63 Percent Walk N`.ar` rte_ � --` _ �. _ _ e 37 Percent Transfer - Y " 0 Percent Auto Bike Use: =� _ -1 Medium _ - 13th Avenue Station is located on the east side of the West A-` _-_- _ _ Hills and is the gateway to the SW Barbur Blvd commercial = -- - -1 corridor.Adjacent to the Burlingame Fred Meyer and = — - , between the South Burlingame and Hillsdale neighborhoods, — - �--- it is the closest station to Hillsdale Town Center and the SW - -- Terwilliger Blvd crossing of 1-5,serving as a key connection - .r point for people walking, biking,driving and taking buses - -; _ .- traveling toward Downtown Portland or Tigard/Tualatin. - - �.� --.i._ JENECT =• •�� fir• �lig �.�.4 i �jimmi, PEOPLE LJi : -011 `~ ��` _ __ ,- • Five new and improved pedestrian connections across = -- - ---J- - — - - SW Barbur Blvd - - � - _ _ - -- _ ▪ Raised protected bike lanes and new sidewalks along _ _ - - ' - -----______v._Y^-�" -- 119 PROJECT SCOPE Stephens [�.z ` u ,,),,, u - u r Creek Joni a d t,,,, F- ED ''' ' i'6 ry • 13th Avenue Station (see next page for Functional ' ] ° EP, ' 0, ,: Plan) To Hillsdale ' : --. ._A�, // � Town center L , .0 • Barbur Blvd bike and pedestrian improvements u ,-- ., -0,-/- _ Burlingame ��JBarbur Streetscape Barbur • Intersection reconfiguration at SW 13th Ave/SW Cloverleaf - la i--- _ Condos with raised protected Shops Apartments :\ S�' (.� �. Barbur Blvd .� bike lanes on both sides • Short-term and long-term bike parking :" �v ........... ................. " •. tha• Revised bus stop routing and stop locations O sW e Q, Fred Meyer Q . �• I — FUNDED PROJECTS BY OTHERS M ,"'" a O Station Access Project 7:Custer Sidewalks(funded ,... .--- •''. by PBOT,estimated completion by 2022) Figure 6.3.4 r'''� �� .1 . ;' 13th , -_— — � Wells • •'r`� i /. ' _ /-•. .', --..--.- i � r 1 Fargo ..•''•�. ---- �__ ; GT DI V Viewpoint of station vision rendering Barbur Streetgcape :''2.**** � with raised protected bike k SW Canby St L 1 a; - ---` ,s New or Enhanced Project Elements Existing Assets lanes on both sides .,•' ~A6 • c) L r, - Q Roadway Multifamily - SW Troy St ;r;/ ,6 [i ❑ Sidewalk Employment Q �Lf. ! ii— • •r•' --�� _ _ _ �� ` C'�. Q New/Enhanced Signal Retail j , ''"•• //� 0 — ___ \ Gated Crossing Existing Trail �� • i ij ap � �� W Moss S d NM Crosswalk Q Signal at D ri i - i ' [-I,-- � . ° major road ._I - -- -- —— ,� �" Enhanced Ped. { � Burlingame Er CD ' - -- - u Crossing Crosswalk(s) • r7IIIII ❑ 1 ,r Park ia ❑rbc 0' 100' 200' 400' A Project Feature at major road I SO Z/ ,/// 0 Figure 6.3.2 DRAFT 13th Avenue Station Overview ROW ------- —� ROW I I mi. oi 0� / (,)\ / wi rod It n / 1 / \ ,,, 1 I 1 t I t A), Sidewalk Raised Protected Travel Lane Travel Lane Trackway Light Rail Platform Trackway Travel Lane Travel Lane Raised Protected Sidewalk Bike Lane Bike Lane Figure 6.3.3 DRAFT 13th Avenue Station Cross Section o' 4' 8' 16' 120 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 4L1-----------------I --: /i Ae x Q` /i Imo\ SW Custer Dr 04 r>le Goodwi 1 Donation enter /- ' I w KFC "Ord �0 Well°Y — argo Farg ©,_o L,-,_ • —s– . Bank O 1 ,,,,,...,„,-.- / s* I/ ' % %cP ,___ 40,),„/ •,� ) ,,, MOO � ;� Attis Trading ./‘°4- � '�/ p%��1<�„j 0 ��4y/ / ” /0 i / 1� // 41111111016 a 0 SII / ,r / m ,/ 40 AT .S, ' / . '' / m Figure 6.3.4 DRAFT 13th Avenue Station Plan;Design is conceptual and will be further developed through community engagement and technical design efforts 0' 25' 50' 100' I I Platform PedestrianNew/Improved STATION FEATURES Landscape Crossing -Roadway Project Boundary Shared Transitway 1® Center platform 05 Retaining wall locations Potential Stormwater SW Multnomah Blvd/SW 13th realigned © Potential systems building location Treatment Track Ballasted Track 20 to SW Barbur Blvd with new signalized New/Improved Crossing Gate • Potential Bike Parking intersection Sidewalk Existing Right-of-Way Potential Bus Stop Raised protected bike lanes and 0 New/Enhanced protected intersection Signal ® Back of platform crossing 121 STATION ACCESS PROJECTS Ai I 1 * '\ ib a P:#` i.111 -7 � • IIOlu -0- Terwilliger Bikeway* ` #jv �1110 7___ ` 0. _______::: „. — J+ I� -0- 13th Sidewalks and Bikeway to,'\ .. ,,,,. . -. ,„ i 40101101:'------1111113-- SW Bertha Blvd -0— Custer Walk/Bike Bridge .07%\ . ---� _ -0- Capitol Hill Sidewalks and Bikeway* �� cGs� it ^, -.e-_' _�` a PARTNER-LED PROJECTS � .,....,_ __� ... 9 ,. .. ... , _, ,, , „ss,,,...0_, .:„., _ Completion of Bikeway Gaps along SW V 44rY k±'>� -0Terwilliger Blvd(City of Portland TSP) i 11 ' 1,� ► - co t ► Multnomah Viaduct Safety Improvements(City t ►, -0- of Portland TSP) + ► - 1 4\ 0 • a *These projects are located within the 1/2 mile walkshed of the station,but are not P I Ill°Ivry a • ► �k s* captured within the maps extents • . P; Mr,• Burlingame . 41,/77:7; Park _ j- l�' ; O 0' 100' 200' 400' A am Figure 6.3.5 13th Avenue Station Access Projects and future opportunities 1/2 Mile Station Walkshed 100/200/400'from Station FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES Based on station area context,TriMet and project partners will explore the following: There is estimated demand within the station area for the following private mobility services: New Transit-Oriented Places Adapting the Right-of-Way Mobility solutions can be integrated into Future mobility solutions may be located ® Electric Bike/Scooter Share 0 Carshare buildings at the ground floor,in a parking along the curb or along the sidewalk within garage or associated landscaped area. ' ,- 7 . , - a public or private street-outside of the 0 On-Demand Ridehailing project boundary. TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Adapting Existing Places Property owners may work with the city 13th Avenue Station is located near to commercial employment and commercial mixed-use zones. Increased access to the neighborhood may _ _%mand mobility providers on solutions such helpspurdevelopment between SW Barbur Blvd and the SW Multnomah Blvd as in a parking lot or landscaped area. p frontage road,and affordable housing opportunities facing onto SW Barbur Blvd.This is identified as the SW 13th Avenue Focus area in the Barbur Concept Plan. See Chapter 4.12 for a complete list of mobility partnering opportunities. 1 22 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 6.4 19th Avenue Station 0 2,000 Projected Daily Trips • : :-_ — 0 87 Percent Walk -- -_-_-- - -_. O12 Percent Transfer - - -_. =_-- Bike Use: -,-----.7.L.,-------= - -__ 01 Percent Auto row _ =--�_ _ --y .. _ 19th Avenue Station is nested within a neighborhood and „ - -- _ _-- - -..=-.--= }_- =Y commercial area located at the intersection of SW Capitol Hill - y-- —.. -_- --- - -- __.,- .. - - - Rd,SW 19th Ave and SW Barbur Blvd.The SW 19th Ave and r - - - '' SW Spring Garden St overcrossings of 15 provide convenient _ _ a. gor- multimodal access from the station to the South Burlingame _ neighborhood east of 1-5.The station is adjacent to a recently -=;•�;l ii `` -I., - . '- ;-,..--'14.--.— I ri.sio !i t fi — : T. . , _ ■�I • remodeled Safeway store and is one of two stations within �_.,to -f' ii �.„oni�riME close proximity to the Multnomah neighborhood.A number of _. ___ . 77. :”' _ _ • schools, housing and parks are clustered near this station. - - �`T" " - ~ - - PROJECT BENEFITS �- MOVE AND CONNECT PEOPLE �. r � � • Five new and improved pedestrian connections across - - 7-:—.- l=---yam :___ SW Barbur Blvd - _ • Raised protected bike lanes and upgraded sidewalks .0 _ - -_ 'gam' along SW Barbur Blvd = • Planned connections to bus line 39 Raised protected bike lanes and The station provides access to the Streetscape improvements will 4,,�O wide sidewalks along SW Barbur Safewayas well as neighborhoods . ,, introduce a climate appropriate • Two lanes retained in each direction on SW Barbur Blvd "gyp Blvd create a more complete plant palette and improve the urban 0 MAINTAIN AND CREATE EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES multimodal network - on both sides of 1-5 tree canopy on SW Barbur Blvd • Supports the vision of the Barbur Concept Plan Figure 6.4.1 DRAFT 19th Avenue Station Vision • Access to Multnomah and Markham neighborhoods, Capitol Hill St. Clare's and West Hills Christian schools, DESIGN VALUES:APPLYING COMMUNITY FEEDBACK IN ONGOING DESIGN and Safeway grocery store • Final design of intersections should minimize crossing lengths to facilitate safe,frequent pedestrian movements • Access to Marigold Hydro Park,Custer Park,SW Trails across SW Barbur Blvd #4 and SW Trails#6 • Bicycle and pedestrian facility design should accommodate existing and planned improvements on SW Capitol Hill 0 PRESERVE AND RESTORE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Rd,SW 19th Ave and SW Spring Garden Rd to unite neighborhoods along SW Barbur Blvd and across I-5 • Enhanced street tree canopy and stormwater treatment • Stormwater facilities should be integrated to reinforce desired character as the headwaters of the Tryon Creek along SW Barbur Blvd watershed • Platform location and configuration will be explored to enhance public space and improve access • Design station area in coordination with development plans on surrounding properties • Final design of SW Barbur Blvd and SW 19th Ave intersection to review alternative truck turning movements and removal of vehicular slip lane to provide safer crossing for pedestrian and bicyclists 123 PROJECT SCOPE ... L—I u 0. : U I-I 1 r,41 1---=;U12.=— u . .,i3lJalf l D - r • 19th Avenue Station and light rail infrastructure • -1 0 Li' O .� " '-II 0 I. ` 1 fir; Erni • Barbur Blvd bike and pedestrian improvements �r sw rrai s#4 1 4� - I t* / 4bJr:. i1 I` "H., �. r'1p r h-, r : . . .. • Short-term and long-term bike parking i= , . y* SW MOSS St • Revised bus stop routing and stop locations coital '- . cln-n-' • • - : • - - 'pi, :.• est Hills rj ,_Tt a � '-, _ 1,-//' PROJECTS BY OTHERS ? •� '' f2 _ . p •Ch ' 'an Schoi Pedestrian connection SW Evans St • - •" • 0 Station Access Project 9:Capitol Hill Sidewalks& Ito SW 19th Ave ; ': • r Bikeway(partially funded by PBOT(funding uncertain), 1 L i Figure 6.4.4 y -� -.;" estimated completion by 2022 for funded portions) I --�-- ii ; �� O SW Capitol Hill Rd r" 11 [. �d • m Station Access Project 10: 19th Bikeway(partially T�M„itn ar�� funded by PBOT,estimated completion by 2021 for yI1 -k.#4P"'ah 1-'l I . 19th •.t o�`°°� -s funded portions) — Park Fiesta F �� Apartments I Safeway ,v + i S �-_ 1_]L ® Station Access Project 13:24th Sidewalks&Bikeway SPi'Mu/rnomaheivd ,,� i,, ,,r, ' , r� ❑ �+L,D, V Viewpoint of station vision rendering (3 ' $ 94.0 kyr Din 0!I ° Barbur Streetscape , 6. --New or Enhanced Project Elements Existing Assets •.) . elm wit raised protected bike iv .''• : Ei DCILa [' I Do a, lanes on both sides =4 '� ' I Roadway Multifamily iElevated Roadway over SW. i 4 Sidewalk Employment 117:(1) '`� Multnomah Blvd Capit I Hill - �fli 0 New/Enhanced Signal Retail y Ft ElemeR#ary� * �� Gated Crossing Existing Trail -- �' ` \.5 �. L � '�� NM _ I Crosswalk Signal at ,# S i eri St; 10 i,ILIO C7�-: _ Enhanced Ped. major road1/7--.., P2 I o ,00zoo 400'Crossing _ Crosswalk(s) nrienLL'f f at major road [ — I 'rte ti St.Clare's L,1J Project Feature ....',1 . School I -1 v i•i - w _ : • A..., rte, Figure 6.4.2 DRAFT 19th Avenue Station Overview I ROW 7----__ J— ROW I lit T lel I I 1 %Iiii,.: we )0,5 wc s A I�i� �ia ,... 4ii,‘ t lit j I j 41 t I t P coo 'Sidewalk Raised Protected Travel Lane Travel Lane Light Rail Platform Trackway Turn Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Turn Lane Raised Protected Sidewalk • Bike Lane Bike Lane Figure 6.4.3 DRAFT 19th Avenue Station Cross Section o' 4' 8' 16' 124 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT _, : ,:0°.*:"/ ., /I: , /.,-,,,,, r :11 BarburBlvd _ RentalsBt. z S r . .. 4,,,e4 . D, lir, c3 / .0,, / SW Capitol Hill Rd 1----11/1 er 1\11111111 r t o ' I"3 / I' Safeway © __ Q , /7r Vertical Diner moo° A; / 11111. r . / SW Multnomah Blvd h (177-71 1140/0.4 .,, / Ft ah Blvd ,�� 9G�P� f�ar4r, Ai \� SW Multnom - /t/o' O • ,�{ / , / Figure 6.4.4 DRAFT 19th Avenue Station Plan;Design is conceptual and will be further developed through community engagement and technical design efforts 0' 25 50' 100' I I Platform Pedestrian m New/Improved STATION FEATURES Landscape Crossing Roadway Project Boundary * Shared Transitway Split side platform(northbound) Potential Stormwater 2 Split sideplatform southbound Treatment Track Ballasted Track (southbound) New/Improved Crossing Gate • Potential Bike Parking Sidewalk O Raised protected bike lanes and Existing Right-of-Way Potential Bus Stop ntersectlon 0 New/Enhanced ® Pedestrian Z-crossing Signal ® Retaining wall locations ® Potential systems building location 125 STATION ACCESS PROJECTS -..ir 7r Hir iilF- # lig 1411411 # 'iliffA Spring Garden and Dolph Sidewalks and Bikeway im- - ri mi` 1 i % D. ill :, • A -® MEP I a si. tea■ .$ i • Fis -®- 30th Sidewalks* g C k IN■ z ! dliz *- - _ _ - _ SW Evans St PARTNER-LED PROJECTS i _._ �Q' `� Spring Garden Sidewalk and Bikeway \ �� -_ .� Improvements(City of Portland TSP) - � �, _ , ‘op j , t Multnomah Viaduct Safety Improvements(City of Portland TSP) i i ti i i -Q- 1 1 i s , i SW 30th Ave/SW Hume St/SW 31st Ave MIfah OR ‘ . — 9h r el-Q- Sidewalk and Bikeway Improvements(City of ' � - Portland TSP)* 1 *These projects are located within the 1/2 mile walkshed of the station,but are not -F,kv, O �,i I. captured within the maps extentstv y a 1' ,.ri:. .. ' , . . 3 .... ,,, . __......... . lor Fp--4 " �.,.. , . r. ARP ��4 ip IR a it7■ i'iim _ — M. -- , .. ,i, rnr 0' 100' 200' 400' A) zi . .1. . 1_ 1 MEM .�` Figure 6.4.5 19th Avenue Station Access Projects and future opportunities C) 1/2 Mile Station Walkshed 100/200/400'from Station FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES Based on station area context,TriMet and project partners will explore the following: There is estimated demand within the station area for the following private mobility services: New Transit-Oriented Places Adapting Existing Places Mobility solutions can be integrated into Property owners may work with the city ® Electric Bike/Scooter Share © On-Demand Shuttles buildings at the ground floor,in a parking �— and mobility providers on solutions such garage or associated landscaped area. �eh m as in a parking lot or landscaped area. Q On-Demand Ridehailing TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Public Realm Adapting the Right-of-Way Mobility solutions may be integrated in Future mobility solutions may be located 19th Avenue Station is located in a commercial mixed use zone,with proximity to Safeway, Multnomah Village and three nearby schools.The area has seen an area set aside for stormwater needs, along the curb or along the sidewalk within A •N systems buildings or hardscaped plaza. a public or private street outside of the some recent change with the addition of rowhouses across the freeway.There project boundary. are also major pedestrian/bike improvements and large parcels facing Barbur Blvd that could encourage street-level activities around the station.This is identified as the Capitol Hill Focus area in the Barbur Concept Plan. See Chapter 4.12 for a complete list of mobility partnering opportunities. 126 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 6.5 30th Avenue Station 0 4,200 Projected Daily Trips - -?' -- _,, ---_ ---: .- — 0 95 Percent Walk 4:d3 .- ._-`';.t ~ y Q 0 Percent Transfer = - �" v - Bike Use: T CI .4.,,,,.. , , _. .. 5 Percent Auto Medium *• ` - , , •... _ ._. 30th Avenue Station is located on SW Barbur Blvd „. y W. -,, ►= - =l`1� - =.',.._ .- `- ' {AT. .-, RIZ .- � +alar` .. providing direct access to the Markham and Multnomah ° ` ., ... __ '` • �— neighborhoods. Nearby SW 26th Ave provides convenient :;;,;;-�f;,,,,��„__ t• =.� "y_ �, �..;;-- ==_ • -_- , 4 �, �� ' • - - access from residential areas east of 1-5. Located near •�_-_ ;,,,,iiii7'-i,-._ — existing commercial and office areas,30th Avenue Station '�.�`� !!il:;,,;ii • = `� - — - _ also provides access to neighborhood amenities and ` -•liZi./.'.y,//iiiiirii�,,..••• �•,��- supports future growth. i i t PROJECT BENEFITS kir, ` • k llll�lilil��ii' 0 MOVE AND CONNECT PEOPLE _ ��‘‘ • Realignment of the SW 30th Ave intersection for safer immi �`- • -y ``—s— -�� _ Zr. _ bike and pedestrian connections ~ . ■ "� • Seven new and improved pedestrian connections across • ---;,----, Y= -; -- moi SW Barbur Blvd • - - • • ,� • Raised protected bike lanes and upgraded sidewalks '- = -.: _ 7---To.... —. �_--� . • P9 — ' along SW Barbur Blvd - • Two lanes retained in each direction along SW Barbur A mix of retail destinations are A reconfigured intersection at Streetscape improvements will Blvd walkable from the station,including 4 S Barbur Blvd and SW 30th Ave ,, introduce a climate-appropriate Barbur Plaza creates a safer and shorter crossing , plant palette and improve the urban 0 MAINTAIN AND CREATE EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES distance for pedestrians and cyclists tree canopy on SW Barbur Blvd • Supports the vision of the Barbur Concept Plan Figure 6.5.1 DRAFT 30th Avenue Station Vision • Access to Multnomah and Markham neighborhoods • Access to Spring Garden Park and Tryon Creek DESIGN VALUES:APPLYING COMMUNITY FEEDBACK IN ONGOING DESIGN Headwaters • Final design of intersections should minimize crossing lengths to facilitate safe,frequent pedestrian movements 0 PRESERVE AND RESTORE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT across SW Barbur Blvd • Enhanced street tree canopy and stormwater treatment • Raised protected bike lanes facilities to accommodate existing and planned improvements on SW 24th,26th and 30th along SW Barbur Blvd Avenues to maximize comfort and safety for pedestrians and commuters choosing bicycles • Intersections designs to support u-turns and turning movements that provide adequate vehicular circulation to maintain access to neighborhoods,while minimizing cut-through traffic circulating through neighborhoods 127 PROJECT SCOPE ,,, r�ToMultnemah Lj To Markham Spring Garden `.3 I. L ' -Villag Neighborhood • 30th Avenue Station and light rail infrastructure Park • [ .,., i, 1 Tt station A. �.-" — • Barbur Blvd bike and pedestrian improvements - ' =7 [ 18LP N. r r SW Dolph Ct �."'; • Intersection reconfiguration at SW 30th Ave/SW ! - � .-, - _ _. ` • •• Barbur Blvd 1 o = ma ! f- -=_ Headwaters M **x'l ;Elevated Roadway • Short-term and long-term bike parking at Tryon Creek Structure over SW 0 t r Apartments 26th Way Al PROJECTS BY OTHERS c'EtLq r--a i Tv0 Station Access Project 14:26th Sidewalks SW Marigold St 7 r1 "'K&Bikeway(partially funded by PBOT,estimated '.= r I _1 r� Barbur + completion by 2022 for funded portions) , Y .• } ill i. :� ......• C'fr? —.130----1-111ZIED c-r- '-'- - I - ` I c SW Primrose St i—;.1. ,,• 30th ► Barbur Streetscape . 9 - I % l 'I ' iV with raised protected bike _ _ _°' igure 6.5.4 co V Viewpoint of station vision rendering lanes on both sides o, �,a� �' � Cr. I � �I Free i ! New or Enhanced Project Elements Existing Assets LJ v'S . ~�' '7 6 0,-. •• G.• % I 1 • D1' Roadway Multifamily SW Alice St'-- - --•^' •'{ .,, a � --mmmmmmL—� - I'-J o 0 Sidewalk Employment l Crestwood • 7i. 'b Q 0 0 New/Enhanced Signal RetailI _ Terrace ,••' i� ''� Cjin Gated Crossing Existing Trail � ''� •+, '' Capitol ,t## d Q o ~ --. .., Plaza `I— Ferry R r 1 331 i NM Crosswalk Signal at �,,. •+ } SW taylorsC3 CL ; Enhanced Ped. major road r r...i. di.�.. I. - • Crossing Crosswalk(s) kir o' ,00 200 400' Project Feature at major roadIVA— .II f--3 �A 0 -.fit 1 • Figure 6.5.2 DRAFT 30th Avenue Station overview I IROW ` — . ,. ----- ROW 1111 NJ 11* I I .7 . Liiio 000 I1 t iii T:,(.„ ,);_\. w( )5,,, I mma MINK 00 _ 00 t,,,,,,,., :,, $ — Sidewalk Raised Protected Travel Lane Travel Lane Light Rail Platform Trackway Turn Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Raised Protected Sidewalk I Bike Lane Bike Lane Figure 6.5.3 DRAFT 30th Avenue Station Cross Section 0' 4' 8' 16' 128 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT -- z";.#0\;\ O . SW Barbur�t f o T 1/ _- - st `D Muchas , 414109111 c Gracias �� Intersection design to connect to IL existing bike lanes on SW 30th Ave is / 1� / / under development �� ♦• r, Chevron Iii v�': ,��a� '� • .,00\ AV .1✓fr# .._I, • �� O 14 /7 ,00,# 1� //A / ,, 0,0 . e�a� //z . ../ , /; x<,a um momS SW Primrose Si ��O / / Figure 6.5.4 DRAFT 30th Avenue Station Plan;Design is conceptual and will be further developed through community engagement and technical design efforts 0' 25' 50' 100' I I Platform Pedestrian m New/Improved STATION FEATURES Landscape Crossing Roadway * Project Boundary * Shared Transitway ® Split side platform(northbound) © Enhanced Pedestrian Crossing Potential Stormwater 2 Split sideplatform(southbound) ® Pedestrian Z-crossing Track Ballasted Track g New/Improved Crossing Gate • Potential Bike Parking O SW 30th Ave realigned to SW Barbur Blvd ® Potential systems building location Sidewalk as a three-way signalized intersection Existing Right-of-Way Potential Bus Stop Raised protected bike lanes and 0 New/Enhanced ® protected intersection Signal 0 Retaining wall locations 129 STATION ACCESS PROJECTSSpring r Garden :10(- • I -le- Spring Garden and Dolph Sidewalks and Bikeway i Park ® �� SW Dolph Ct '� -et— 24th Sidewalks and Bikeway* d or _le_ 30th Sidewalks I ill• - ale ... 11 0 ."..wma r ,, -, .I PARTNER LED PROJECTS • 4#. 4�--- a.-- — — S`�BattUtct _ SpringGarden Sidewalk and BikewayI `„6111W411imid 1 -O Improvements(City of Portland TSP)* SW Marigold St —J � �, .' SW 30th Ave/SW Hume St/SW 31st Ave • ' tea, p 001 CV p~ -0— Sidewalk and Bikeway Improvements(City of II - Ar,..*- r i ti iV i Portland TSP) IV* 411 ii ft 7 I , + , i 9 1 1 L • SW Primrose St . 1 -- \ 2Oth -©- Inner SW Taylors Ferry Rd Safety Improvements - ' �` (City of Portland TSP) I. if b 1iii , *These projects are located within the 1/2 mile walkshed of the station,but are not * Ale !iift• °+ ai captured within the maps extents kr OM rrn it iii 'i SW Alice St r lle i "� - M 5 i t ,,,,i Aio or ,o_z o A Figure 6.5.5 30th Avenue Station Access Projects and future opportunities C) 1/2 Mile Station Walkshed 100/200/400'from Station FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES Based on station area context,TriMet and project partners will explore the following: There is estimated demand within the station area for the following private mobility services: New Transit-Oriented Places Adapting Existing Places Mobility solutions can be integrated into Property owners may work with the city ® Electric Bike/Scooter Share © On-Demand Shuttles imm Ell buildings at the ground floor,in a parking . and and mobility providers on solutions such garage or associated landscaped area. �m as in a parking lot or landscaped area. Q On-Demand Ridehailing TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Public Realm Adapting the Right-of-Way Mobility solutions may be integrated in Future mobility solutions may be located Located beyond the boundary of the West Portland Town Center Plan,existing zoning places an emphasis on commercial and employment uses,although an area set aside for stormwater needs, along the curb or along the sidewalk within A •NI systems buildings or hardscaped plaza. a public or private street outside of the some residential is allowed. Reconfiguration of the intersection at SW 30th Ave project boundary. and SW Barbur Blvd may create redevelopment opportunities between Barbur Blvd and 1-5 for mixed-income housing. Further exploration of zoning changes by the City of Portland may be warranted to support TOD objectives.This area See Chapter 4.12 for a complete list of mobility partnering opportunities. was identified as the SW 26th Avenue Focus Area in the Barbur Concept Plan. 130 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 6.6 Barbur Transit Center ill 2,900 Projected Daily Trips0 _ - _ _ _- - - -_- -=----1--.A...l = ®65PercentWalk �� _ _ _ __ __ _ _�� - � •-- _ _ Q 12 Percent Transferby 0 24 Percent Auto Bike Use: _ _ _ — r-,� Low -:1_ .. _ — ::-_,—.-""= .7 - With views to Mt. Hood and centered within the West . _ -_. - _ Portland Town Center,the Barbur Transit Center is the high y --r �. • w - .- visibilityflagship station of the new Southwest Corridor Light .t: • = Rail Project within the City of Portland. With access to 1-5, , -- En_ !iy' - — SW Capitol Hwy,SW Taylors Ferry Rd, multiple bus routes,an R -r=° '; � R or __ F~f= - MAI r ALJ u- �� ..., existing pedestrian bridge across 1-5 and nearby connections ._,;___.,...1„.. _" "r 1`=��r�� ra` I. '' - to SW Trails, Barbur Transit Center is at the crossroads -° ' i••AN of multimodal mobility.The transit center consists of bus I `" :-,;::, -_ _ amenities,a light rail connection a surface Park&Ride with _* - 1 .te ;;. ;k = ` • �� '� ....1..--,•, i .ryij� s�int��_ up to 300 spaces,improved pedestrian access,and bike : . ;�;: — parking facilities. - - Wiz. r, 'E ti,j+i, — �� PROJECT BENEFITS �� - ff/ ten` 0 MOVE AND CONNECT PEOPLE -----. ``— }'' �:z..' 4` maF1fT- TJ connections across --•er` -3d, -4Alp- ',-/_- 7. -"+ --- .. : • Raised protected bike lanes and upgraded sidewalks s reetscape improvements will • aloe SW Barbur Blvd The station allows for seamless The station directly serves residents 9 introduce a climate appropriate OQ 4 connections between rail,bus and a plant palette and improve the urban m and businesses in the West Portland • Planned connections to bus lines 38,43,44,93 and 94 auto in the adjacent Park&Ride tree canopy on SW Barbur Blvd Town Center 0 MAINTAIN AND CREATE EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES Figure 6.6.1 DRAFT Barbur Transit Center Vision • Supports the visions of the West Portland Town Center and the Barbur Concept Plan • Access to West Portland Park, Markham and Multnomah DESIGN VALUES:APPLYING COMMUNITY FEEDBACK IN ONGOING DESIGN neighborhoods • Final design of street and intersections to provide safe crossings of SW Barbur Blvd focused on access to transit and • Serves Jackson and Markham Schools,Capitol Hill frequent crossings within this central Pedestrian District within West Portland Town Center Library and Barbur World Foods grocery • Station and alignment adjustments and on-street bus facilities should be considered to maximize support for West • Opportunity to redevelop Barbur Transit Center with Portland Town Center visions and potential redevelopment of Barbur Transit Center affordable housing and other community serving • Facilities that support multi-modal travel behaviors should be integrated into Transit Center designs to prioritize amenities walking,biking, bus transfers,car share and micromobility options such as pick-up/drop-off and scooters • Access to Woods Memorial Natural Area,SW Trails#5 • Type,size and location of Park&Ride will be finalized to support access to transit,yet balance multi-modal and West and SW Trails#7 Portland Town Center goals QPRESERVE AND RESTORE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT • Throughout final engineering,continue coordination with adjacent partner-led projects to ensure complete • Enhanced street tree canopy and stormwater treatment connections for people walking and biking along SW Barbur Blvd 131 PROJECT SCOPE L- • Barbur Transit Center and light rail infrastructure C~ L-j u' - r •a- .. •. �"'"`� • Barbur Blvd bike and pedestrian improvements — 1J 7swP�U�st, L L: •-• • Short-term and long-term bike parking Woods Memorial �� Liam • Revised bus stop routing and stop locations Natural Area ,�"n 6. 0 Barbur ' ad LIGz. e� • Surface Park&Ride with up to 300 parking spaces Transit- - - - -•• -�,- •,. • Barbur streetscape c ' w°� Center • 0•i with raised protectedIike lanes on both sides PROJECTS BY OTHERS �, � � a�.,•r` ' +'••+si't T9 drS f2R I{ • - ''• • O Station Access Project 18:Capitol Sidewalks& �. �'""` r- _ �'�"• ! . J { Brour i4/o`10 4- 1 Bikeway(partially funded by PBOT(funding uncertain), / Poods Bus Transit Center ! r� estimated completion by2022 for funded portions) - � • •� Surface Park&Ride ! P C u r--- \� '' 2-;, Surface with up to 300 spaces! ® Station Access Project 21:40th Sidewalks& 6$ 1 r cr ! Bikeway(partially funded by PBOT(funding uncertain) 61�6• (� ••..�' � /t V�, Existing BTC ! 6• +'.ppedestrian Bridge , �`• t i�� 1_ at 15 ! B O ♦ ' _ ♦♦�` igure 6.6.4 • - r i V Viewpoint of station vision rendering 1 ti�0 Public Transit Supportive _ 4 .4i wS New or Enhanced Project Elements ExistingAssets r►r ►►,,,,o,�� ----VI Development Opportunity r! - C _ ►►►►►►r►►r+rrir ir11�11►►.1►,,,► — �d st West Portland Town Center Plan --_Q -'t i Roadway (see Section 6.7) Multifamily \ • F� 4�ri Da - rr- , -u- i U Q r' r I� Sidewalk Employment Elevated Structure over 1-5 C_ d f rUL Q Q New/Enhanced Signal Retail •/ !�1. . q `1 .1 �] 7 SW Huber St ---Crossing Existing Trail ® - Q D, i n f il NM Crosswalk Signal at •® r i a ----- _ �Q1-� G_ I , E 1 IN Enhanced Ped. major road -cz , n +►- *. - - i- Crossing Crosswalk(s) 1� [ o' ,00' zoo 400' P _ Project Feature at major road Mil ' ,,,� ;_1_ co 0 ti - L.L Lis} l.'E i --1-1 i Figure 6.6.2 DRAFT Barbur Transit Center overy ew e _ ROW / �� ROW rz I lul 1 .0. ' IN.- 1 �O� /�. 1.-, _ _ iii,N* _ _ 1 4", . 1 nMal / ,1 I CcTI nVIM 111 I i t I' (7,--,„ (-7, „, fig I , --- --- 1 I 1 t I t A Sidewalk Raised Protected Travel Lane Travel Lane Trackway Light Rail Platform Trackway Travel Lane Travel Lane Raised Protected Sidewalk Bike Lane Bike Lane Figure 6.6.3 DRAFT Barbur Transit Center Cross Section 0' 4' 8' 16' Platform Pedestrian New/Improved •..... \41(1@ti-'40 .= Landscape Crossing Roadway . Potential Stormwater Project Boundary Shared Transitway Z Treatment Track Ballasted Track .: •— r New/Improved Crossing Gate • Potential Bike Parking fy,; Sidewalk ---- Existing Right-of-Way ® Potential Bus Stop 0 O New/Enhanced y • Signal ss STATION FEATURES r / ,,'�0t 0 Center platform © Existing pedestrian bridge 11R ,-/ ` 20 Connection to existing pedestrian bridge 0 On-street bike lanes on SW Barbur Blvd - `, /'" ``��‘ 30 Bus transit center 0 Potential systems building location ,`,,`��s%� : /,"/ 0 Surface Park&Ride with up to 300 spaces ® Retaining wall locations /" �, 0 5 Raised protected bike lanes and protected r / " intersection -f ' r • *fi ,,-- ' „,* , 0 ..,,, ;000,,-- floo , / _,...„-- ,40. PLR- #4, - *# a ilo ,,,60)114 k IY. 11.-A.\''i a Ai ) SW Taylors Ferry Rd !P • t# ,._, *# __.,_ ,c)_ ______ , __ 0_ $t*I.f____ __ ,\\-N 4 .,‘ /1) < , / ;>' OS% 1 44''' a 1 !lye 1111: kill, IL 0,—° ,11 S % li, t mow to- 4111111111111111111m11/1111111.1 itille'' 41111 – 44. U � � //111111°11111.11111.1111111:11°‘ I°: , _ED ' 4, *# 1-1 Jle -, 9; , ,, ,.- j 1 uay ,•` 4 ��, 1, �' \-5Ft Q c_ Light Rail Structure Over A 1.5 o zeso ioo __ ., .._,..,..r. Figure 6.6.4 DRAFT Barbur Transit Center Plan;Design is conceptual and will be further developed through community engagement and technical design efforts 133 STATION ACCESS PROJECTS . �" - • " 0 7P ErP. I- 'r /1 . e : I ' l -0- Taylors Ferry Sidewalks and Bikeway il% - -' • *'• �. w 1 iii ■ �� ma a 111 PARTNER-LED PROJECTS1 } _ __ 7` ll ©_ Inner SW Taylors Ferry Rd Safety Improvements — s� • o Fe0 (City of Portland TSP)* +�� 0.06C3'J ■ Saa is - _ SW Capitol Hwy Corridor Improvements(City of ) `" / ry�-'+ ` -� Portland TSP) t # �� r al- s 441 �'— I I 1 _©_ Barbur Crossroads Safety Project a i ti +_: (ODOT) +. ,4,, —-Barbur Transit - .' - 'IR-_-Center *These projects are located within the 1/2 mile walkshed of the station,but are not captured within the maps extents / F 111, 8\Ja - arbut - � . s,�e Ali. lir 0 " iIl#S' ■ _ SW WI/bard St if al s 4 . .i ,� 0, 100' 200' 400' A A: I ikA.Figure 6.6.5 Barbur Transit Center Station Access Projects and future opportunities 1/2 Mile Station Walkshed 100/200/400'from Station FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES Based on station area context,TriMet and project partners will explore the following: There is estimated demand within the station area for the following private mobility services: New Transit-Oriented Places Mobility solutions can be integrated into ® Electric Bike/Scooter Share 0 Carshare imm MI buildings at the ground floor,in a parking garage or associated landscaped area. Q On-Demand Ridehailing TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Barbur Transit Center is located within the West Portland Town Center,one of two regionally-designated town centers in Southwest Portland. Planning underway in 2020-2021 focus on a providing a full range of affordable housing options and culturally relevant goods and services.The publicly-owned site at the Barbur Transit Center Park&Ride provides an opportunity for potential future joint development. See Chapter 4.12 for a complete list of mobility partnering opportunities. 134 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT -.::,,ii;- • K- -` :et, ._ - •Y,- a -:� , _ " - • * ti •',e-...L 4 .- •ry - � :_ " x1, . 4 • ! ` {a ,#,.r..r..... -1..• 10-„- f t. " -K { i }. ' - -•r� 1,- _ A1Ca,,i F3 ;_ 's{ , tL Yi' • •• , y �1`, ; • • • • , ` A. • %-A�' 9 - ' _ • • 4• } i-. i ri,r .t t ri A'� - S - • ilT _ r ! lRifdr• x *5w� . 'w ,F`A• , • ` � _ I "L, - f*.; �E' S � �111,110;11.4114r r PI .. -� ..1.4:1 :'' . 4 CIO 4.4 i , V! .• ' -- . ' 's 7,..? ,,,,. t:• t f = itItt,,„,,, ._ .. 4,A,,t ..,., -_ .. .....„ .., .• .t..,.. ,_,„ t._,. . . • , _ ..... .,• .,• • *I. r--,-.1. ., li'i,t•ri....i i, ',.4'. •I( . * i ' : VIA ' / M...;: .. It . , • ' 1. .: . . 'a .', ..-d• . ."1111 A i: ._ ''''L',": . - •-1;, SW Taylors Ferry Rd = burg i, ."::. . *: . -, . : ' ' .; ..... l_ J,F SW Bat 4 t. ':,:, 1� _ -------------\iiiiipti., #� ti Figure 6.6& 5 �f, ' A 4rnikr41; irl „ow. -1.5 - ,,,,: •it)t0 : „mss r .� 40i ."' ' ' . d .,. . 1 .• '1.-,,,- , - ••, '`.: • •1- ."...t,"/A. ••*-1111tPZ.;;''• 1 1 butB� fy SW Huber "` w• ! N .a '. SW gar ;� x.. • +w ,� Figure 6.6.6 1-5/SW Barbur Blvd Intersection Crossing � I I I�� nil ten• i „s..., ^i H ti f• H ''• Figure 6.6.7 DRAFT 1-5 Crossing Cross Section ImMEN1 In1,111111144Hr Capitol Hwy 1-5 , I Figure 6.6.8 DRAFT SW Barbur Blvd Section 0' 16' 32' 6.7 Barbur Transit Center Public Opportunity Site .* 41- 0 Barbur Transit Center is a publicly owned property Note: Public opportunity site discussions • identified in the 2018 SW Corridor Equitable Housing o continue coordination with ODOT. 4--•— Strategy as an opportunity for mixed-use,mixed-income C) ` .1 development.A wide diversity of community members Ct �_tot iir,., participating in the City of Portland's West Portland Town Q' �� M,--,E° -"7;.) Fso Center Plan process envision this site as a Multi-Cultural :i0. %.� Hub, providing culturally specific services and amenities in TAYLORS FERRY RD. .5�� iii. 447$1,,, addition to affordable housing for the area's immigrant and -,,,,e'''''' " ° refugee communities. An initial redevelopment concept o M Eo ,,,,,, ��., ''''''''''• °5 ,,,,0 �y incorporated these priorities to achieve equitable transit- ��* a oriented development(ETOD). •'�bv � - „50"% ,,,,, 04�� . v • 7//:4tA Redevelopment could occur in conjunction with the light oFF '• ill rail project. New residents, businesses and workers will (/ iiti‘ Q ►�� p Potential Development increase early ridership if redevelopment can be timed to / Public Open Space open with new transit service. Continued investigation of ia: Private Open Space the side running option is needed to achieve better ETOD. SW Light Rail Line U.S. HWY. 1-5 i Bus Layover \\t,; Pedestrain Only Road REDEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PROGRAM Bus Circulation • Five buildings:3 mixed use and 2 office i� Pedestrian Circulation N o a „o • 230-300 apartments "°�" • 15,000-20,000 square feet for retail Figure 6.7.1 Barbur Transit Center Public Opportunity Site:Side Running Alignment(Source:Portland Bureau of Planning&Sustainability) • 100,000-170,000 square feet of office space • Three floors of parking with 150-250 stalls • Long-term property ownership • 10,000-15,000 square feet of community event and/or DESIGN VALUES:APPLYING COMMUNITY FEEDBACK POTENTIAL PUBLIC BENEFITS office space IN ONGOING DESIGN • Some affordable housing required for lower-income • 10,000-15,000 square feet of public open space • Side running vs.center alignment households • 10,000-15,000 square feet of private open space • Site redevelopment phasing • Indoor community space for cultural events and/or • Bus layover area office space for nonprofit service providers Y • Land use entitlements • Retail can include space for businesses providing • Transportation circulation design supportive of ETOD culturally relevant goods and services(ex. Halal grocer or multi-cultural market place) • Outdoor space is aligned to preserves views of Mt. Hood and provide opportunity for public art and community gatherings • Circulation prioritizes pedestrians and connects the pedestrian bridge to the new station • Office space for businesses and new jobs 136 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT A Note: Public opportunity site discussions � o continue coordination with ODOT. , �! _iiiiiia 'PP %:% ,----2- ik:-' .- --a' 7,40✓ Resident al ` ; ,♦ v.. -..-_. , s comme«ai , ,,, Community / I, I Office v Parking ' l % ''' \c,•*,.,\ ............. Cpc:0:10)1....., • 011* 0 • Mars An° .4 � S� ♦♦ 0 �j♦ i/ 4 A oi oo j Hope 00 °O 1S-C'.' 4;i.) lit0 . ,.o 6 r i , ® '...., 0 ,„,„,0, . a ,to oNG ,..„...,soir. / „,„ ... . ,._ v IPP ,,s. , © oFF�GE ,,�, V ��0 oFF�� Imo,, ,♦,♦♦♦♦1111 r j 1.-iplp, , .ill) � � i �, 7 ,%11� � Potential Development .� Public Open Space e ///, Private Open Space SW Light Rail Line U.S. HWY. 1-5 m Bus Layover r ^� Pedestrain Only Road Bus Circulation � Pedestrian Circulation - Feet — / NORTH o so ao so Figure 6.7.2 Barbur Transit Center Public Opportunity Site:Center Running Alignment(Source:Portland Bureau of Planning&Sustainability) 137 6.8 Street Improvements:South of Barbur Transit r+ ,#!I F' -.'' a 1 3 # Center •+ 11.01a.... , _ =-,r.'ti - •• +1" , err�1 1 d'''''...11. 0 c-vr- fi # ` ail. r * - It a ! Barbur streetscape �-v � �} z. s' Fr , ■*ye improvements with raised ;�tk- 'a4.1 %..,..t +!.��y t i6 y e, '' S Taylors Ferry Rd protected bike lanes\ e 1114 p iM r N-1y - t ,ti fe ,r ,111. 1 1' • � $Babui1 plo4.f ... f w J } 4 I „ .- ''` .#46' yi' * i. 01' ` e�JaTransit * i "e'.4t •'' • 8a1b°' � Center iiii 17.1.04.1,_ I. • -7f. 111114701.1.6 P 0 441.* .. .J h r QilkS f LIr ilif '�+ .p�,�fzs* � � �� SWLuradelSt ,f liimoi i qv :1 1,.4 ....; E i ' ' i V 4114:-V ter■ ■.wr■ itF fsi { . 4y may-_ -4 F lb #_ +(S Enhanced ■ ' '+ `� 11 . ilk _ 4#� pedestrian � ir. Existing Infrastructure 11,:iorillipriKw crossing111141111111w_.„ ••Existing Bike Lanes i:{ ■ . - SW Dickinson St • �� Proposed Infrastructure 53rd ''"' _ —Sidewalks �. pli Barbur streetscapeeCIII: —Raised Protected Bike Lane t Enhanced S. improvements with sidewalks —Striped Bike Lane B. a and bike lanes pedestrian 0 —Sharrow I P if crossing c' 53rd streetscape i r — with uphill bike lane, , rr 150' MY 6o0' A 0.0...41B . downhill sharrow e. � AN Figure 6.8.1 Extent of pedestrian and bike improvements on Barbur Blvd,south of Barbur Transit Center 1P-.. o0o e� / fir' - b V- I ,—)\ ��\\ I \ li 1 8 8 o ° o (— — — itt— %OPt 1 i l 1 i 4 1 t C Sidewalk Bike Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Turn Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Bike Lane Sidewalk Figure 6.8.2 DRAFT Barbur Blvd Cross Section,south of Barbur Transit Center 0' 4' 8' 16' 138 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 6.9 53rd Avenue Station 0 2,400 Projected Daily Trips ®65 Percent Walk Ce, • Q 1 Percent Transfer Bike Use: w 0 34 Percent Auto Low ' ' Pli � - - 53rd Avenue Station is located in the Far Southwest 1' 7. --.�..+= :�� neighborhood off SW 53rd Ave between SW Barbur Blvd �� "' ---":-- . 'r � � �� - - and 5.Adjacent to the wooded slopes of Mt. Sylvania, --=' of °- ' n ,-'*.e - ..-.r ,� _ �r! 9 Y sr� _ _ I. 7o l'"'' the station serves the neighborhood and the PCC-Sylvania J �. ,�, ir�' 1. campus. Complementing walk and bus access to the station, A j -�- ` — "� the site includes a proposed surface Park&Ride with up to • - =� •'. 11. • - 310 spaces,and improvements on SW 53rd Ave for people == = - -- �4 -'`:-'-L�� - walking and biking. -- ;� . . i 41P PROJECT BENEFITS _1 ' =�ri-"..••-i .`c. _N`N.--. •,_F` • 0 MOVE AND CONNECT PEOPLE - — j . -N410 • New sidewalk along SW Barbur Blvd and an improved ldirr �_r +'. ; f pedestrian crossing at SW 53rd Ave + % • ` • New bike and walk access to PCC-Sylvania on SW 53rd '� • 'M ' I" • Ave i D * f • Planned connections to bus lines 93 and 94 53rd Ave improvements provide a A new Park&Ride serves riders • New Park&Ride with convenient access to 1-5 Stormwater opportunities are connection for people walking an 2.9_ traveling from farther distances or 0present at the station,Park&Ride • Two lanes retained in each direction along SW Barbur biking between the station and PCC ifrom locations without convenient facility and along SW Barbur Blvd Blvd Sylvania campus transit service to access the light rail 0 MAINTAIN AND CREATE EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES Figure 6.9.1 DRAFT 53rd Avenue Station vision • Supports the vision of the Barbur Concept Plan and the PCC Sylvania Master Plan DESIGN VALUES:APPLYING COMMUNITY FEEDBACK IN ONGOING DESIGN • Access to Far Southwest and Crestwood neighborhoods • Stormwater facilities should be integrated to enhance station area aesthetics and PCC-Sylvania campus • Access to Sylvania Natural Area, Holly Farm Park, Lesser • Final design of street and intersections to provide safe crossings of SW Barbur Blvd focused on comfortable access City Park and SW Trail#7 to bus stops along SW Barbur Blvd and the Portland Community College campus PRESERVE AND RESTORE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT • Type,size and location of Park&Ride will be finalized to support access to transit and address vehicular circulation and support potential development opportunities • Enhanced street tree canopy and stormwater treatment along SW Barbur Blvd 139 PROJECT SCOPE Dickinson Park ' Ash Creek • 53rd Avenue Station and light rail infrastructure — Natural Area fD• Barbur Blvd&53rd Avenue bike and pedestrian 0 ❑ 6� . F3 �? Holl improvements ,Figure 6.9.4 , y + Farm • Short-term and long-term bike parking L -i i Fl 0 ❑ r• Park • Revised bus stop routing and stop locations ° �/ �� 53rd / +r- _ ; , .� �. ,, • Surface Park&Ride with up to 310 parking spaces Om • L'-;1 ' e' ' PROJECTS BY OTHERS -/T7-, "f4--- i ay �'; I - mStation Access Project 18:Capitol Sidewalks& pii yF1 " •'•w•withu Surface toP310da Ride • �C� p \ I- with up 310 spaces _' i �7 -' Bikeway(partially funded by PBOT(funding uncertain), ` estimated completion by 2022 for funded portions) •••• SW Pomona Str ..�'��'`'••••••' X90 •• ® Station Access Project 21: Pomona Sidewalks& .....jvd �� . ~P.9 • `1 J C' .� .01 Bikeway(partially funded by PBOT(funding uncertain) �."•...••SWBarbu Figure 6.9.7 ..� if ' SW Capitol Hwy •• raj 1Dilic I/] V' 4 �ff 1 � � :' aliF�4 0 r C . -[ SW Capitol Hwy Vision Render Viewpoint „.,L' . - ❑ DP D I ] t� . _. New or Enhanced Project Elements Existing Assets n fr ,�Ir I - Roadway Multifamily OOP 01)1'°00 DL 00r _ Sylvania , .- maiirk Sidewalk Employment ` M � Natural Area Park l v 3 ir 41-3:JiJi4Jr-j L.;i-J D 1 0 New/Enhanced Signal Retail "�1i Gated Crossing Existing Trail - L • L,_•1En..i' Li 6711Figure 6.9.9 %--.-1---i 1•. ■ •--ic,-iFA`' C n � E mil Crosswalk Q Signal at '> 1 •.i 'Jr I Enhanced Ped. major road D D '—t❑ r- [2 " r.. D ► ,-7 o �cYLi °- DI Crossing Crosswalk(s) �1 r; • o at major road Ii] - r- L'` . J Li. _,. e Tut %4 Project Feature I it --1 1 L- .1 �� tC'7 C�dCCli]�7 �� 0' 100' 200' 400' A ... �� iagampl�, �� }�� j r•• To PCC-Sylvania �. t .s al i mIP:171.:01 i Mrr■IN=-r.+I ROW Figure 6.9.2 DRAFT 53rd Avenue Station Overview ' ",w ---, _,----t 1lik tit ,.... ,,i3OA;,-s,,-,_, _ — — Qn� -/ L.., :j—f 0) nI n :-r•L Be i ? s._: �< 4 _ w -- Light Rail Trackway Pick Up/ Park&Ride Sidewalk Bike Barbur Blvd Bike Sidewalk Platform Drop-Off Lane Lane Figure 6.9.3 DRAFT 53rd Avenue Station Section 0' 17' 34' Platform Pedestrian New/Improvedr'- / / Landscape Crossing Roadway / / Potential Stormwater Project Boundary Shared Transitway ! /' Treatment Track Ballasted Track '. ti. New/Improved — Crossing Gate • Potential Bike Parking *. •:/ .. •- �v , /' *.--, ��„ Sidewalk ---- Existing Right-of-Way ® Potential Bus Stop .,./...•:, fir, ' l � New/Enhanced ,,��'' Signal .,v * � 1';i- / . /./ STATION FEATURES / % , , *o�� i �f. 0 Center platform 0 New sidewalks cr / r OSW 53rd Ave intersection signalized and 0 On-street bike lanes on SW Barbur Blvd _ - j e 7 J realigned perpendicular to SW Barbur Blvd 0 Potential systems building location 0 Surface Park&Ride with up to 310 spaces ,� ,.yrir- ® Retaining wall locations �'• �' r / 4IPits47 ✓ 0 ij .. - //' , A4P * fy fil • 'r a� �I ,A. S �> F z,ri e- - -o- lb effio4oml tt. . - z 4 / , N- 2, /H4l4 s" ,: o ` o ---- ' c , c!)..„ 0 ,b • •i i trA 9 : 11` 0 ti /0 ' ,, 41/kSW Pomona St i- t---o ' .4°iSiM I I 1 1 PP _ '� D J �L� 0' 2550' 100' A s_ s Figure 6.9.4 DRAFT 53rd Station Plan;Design is conceptual and will be further developed through community engagement and technical design efforts 141 STATION ACCESS PROJECTS '* Dickinson I : � _it_- 53rd Walk/Bike Bridge Park&Woods :;. _®— Pasadena Sidewalks and Bikeway ¢ 1 Pell w J SW Dickinson St _e_ Barbur/PCC to Triangle Connection* , �; - —— PARTNER-LED PROJECTS -.S '� /It . : A i� SW Lesser Rd Sidewalk and Bikeway *Iv 'a t] 43" SW (City of Portland TSP) i ‹p g s ff .44 NIA! 1 b 1 - y Oil. — *These projects are located within the 7/2 mile walkshed of the station,but are not z �f P ,� captured within the maps extents 53td 40010011,...a :, al/. Inril all r:1‘ I I I/ _ ` " _ SW Pomona St r garb6r Blvd ,• +�e !� -- — .,.. • . ,- . a . ______,-101.. cur , Ea' .: ;At Ir t a Iri" i- I. �• i ,�411111Z is Ari it 7 f r • iiiiiiiiiiiiii�ZNIFF. "-i — ' - O Air&i4r . d ■ *.es It• •i 0' 10002200' 400' ■ �. �.. _ • . t I A r Figure 6.9.5 53rd Avenue Station Access Projects and future opportunities 1/2 Mile Station Walkshed 100/200/400'from Station FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES Based on station area context,TriMet and project partners will explore the following: There is estimated demand within the station area for the following private mobility services: New Transit-Oriented Places Adapting Park&Rides Mobility solutions can be integrated into Mobility solutions may be introduced into ® Electric Bike/Scooter Share a Circulator Shuttles imm MI buildings at the ground floor,in a parking dedicated Park&Rides,such as pick-up/ garage or associated landscaped area. , drop-off zones or space for other mobility 0 On-Demand Ridehailing 0 Carshare services. TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT ANIPublic Realm 53rd Avenue Station in the Far Southwest is an area concentrated with single- Mobility solutions may be integrated in family residential housing and student and neighborhood-serving businesses. an area set aside for stormwater needs, systems buildings or hardscaped plaza. The 53rd Avenue Park&Ride(surface lot) may be a location for a long-term phased approach to further activation.This location was identified as a SW 53rd Avenue Focus Area in the Barbur Concept Plan. See Chapter 4.12 for a complete list of mobility partnering opportunities. 142 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT cT, 6,- .____ 11 1 To ir m , a c o 0 0 E Q o v \ , -11 c \ 0'4 0 fid^ _ �r i - W �% �� I �.::: \ 4 maa a �. SW 53rd Ave � # ,r .S . .r ALJ/ Q7/ ui �.�/� V--�- r=1 F��_' / ! - - �i ----- �.��,�/_ GAJ/ -I t. , 0 i �Ii IV ., Z w `\ 3 J , / ` �I H LL V! �\ o Figure 6.9.6 DRAFT 53rd Station Plan;Design is conceptual and will be further developed through community engagement and technical design efforts ii RO ROW I I Platform I Project Boundary I Landscape Track II iti `,II, _ 111Pfi * TtPotentialStormwater Crossing Gate 1 �•� 0 t ---- Existing Right of Way yT mos o 00 I New/Improved Sidewalk mNew/Improved I Roadway co c New/Enhanced Signal Shared Transitway Sidewalk Bike Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane/ Sidewalk Ballasted Track Downhill o' a' a' 16' Pedestrian Sharrow — Crossing 0 Potential Bike Parking ® Potential Bus Stop Figure 6.9.7 DRAFT 53rd Streetscape Cross Section 0' 25 50' 100' .44 ET , i ot, 1_ _ , y C/) C7 y 0 dm .4. E co c c o v) a o , o U az cnC I as d PCC-Sylvania 41._ Campus SW 53rd Ave NommEn lir 41 f,,-l—{—J= v� �/ h'__I N 4! �� 4 : - 4 a Ped/Bike only Z,c; connection at G Street. o, Maintain no through- a P 11: r r traffic access �2 N ' n Figure 6.9.8 DRAFT 53rd Station Plan;Design is conceptual and will be further developed through community engagement and technical design efforts !ROW- ROW, I I I Platform ——— Project Boundary Landscape = Track I0 D r'� Potential Stormwater Crossing Gate Treatment svtl. I It t' 1 tt _ 0 00 00 0 00 4 ---- Existing Right of Way ``� New/Improved I I Sidewalk - New/Improved IWegp Roadway New/Enhanced Shared Transitway Sidewalk Travel Lane Travel Lane/ Potential to SidewalkSignal Downhill Alternate ° a $ 16 Ballasted Track Sharrow Parking/ Pedestrian Crossing • Potential Bike Parking Stormwater ® Potential Bus Stop Figure 6.9.9 DRAFT 53rd Streetscape Cross Section 0' 25 50' 100' .44 144 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 6.10 PCC Connection PCC's campus vision and meeting the anticipated demand and street cross section designs shared in this document. early planning phases of the project,partners for the number of people using the service,while minimizing Ongoing engagement will assist in determining the type of Duringonsigered tunnelpoptions that connect light rail impacts and costs.Additionally,a SW 53rd Ave shuttle avoids shuttle used,including the potential use of autonomous cdirectly to PCC-Sylvania campus.could ig duplication of existing bus service,specifically the Line 44 technologies.Future traffic volumes of the streets adjacent to and discussions with PCC,neighborhood After extensivestakeholdersanalysis and that connects BTC to PCC,Line 78, connecting Elmhurst the SW 53rd Ave improvements are anticipated to be similar to project partners,the Steering Committee removed tunnels Street Station to PCC and Lines 93 and 94,which connect today. from further consideration.The project adopted SW 53rd Ave to the 53rd Avenue Station.A BTC-68th Pkwy shuttle would To 53rd Avenue Station be redundant,increasing transit operating costs with little street improvements to provide a safe and convenient route -, for people walkingand bikingbetween the SW 53rd Avenue additional benefit.A potential 53rd Ave shuttle will be included i ^ a • • 4 P P ^- in the FEIS,and future engagement will help inform decisions .- .P IMPROVED;+` �:— Station and the PCC campus one-half mile away. Proposed 's '--sW.53 ' t ' 11 on whether such a shuttle service is implemented. 3r- n �. improvements for SW 53rd Ave include street paving, 1 avENUE! F . sidewalks,new bike facilities,on-street parking,street trees _:; ` `4 4 •1` ` ' :44, ',' and stormwater facilities. Private motor vehicles would not be TriMet,PCC,PBOT,and Metro staff have studied a potential w,4 R , able to access campus from SW 53rd Ave,minimizing traffic SW 53rd Ave shuttle to address circulation,stop locations, •I . , �` 4 _ `• r. impacts in the neighborhood and improving safety for people *- 'r, a.w.' walking and biking. "-� �•. a The design team also explored multiple mechanized people- ' "'.- { .t -. r' 4 � rt: `• � -1 1+,., ~i ` ` , mover options,including a tram,gondola,personal rapid '} ,s `` !"!; ' =� 4FL - 1— '1 transit rail service,bike share,enhanced bus service and i k*t `' shuttles. Multiple workshops and neighbor input guidedtom •a�'�" �` ; „ • decisions to narrow these options for the LocallyPreferred '" Ww». = Alternative.Two options were carried into the DEIS: `-' •: �'u` " ' ''.. • BTC-68th Pkwy shuttle:a standard bus shuttle •!,,``._ .; y • connecting Barbur Transit Center and 68th Parkway • r •'4,^ Stations to PCC using Capitol Hwy,47th Ave,G St,Lesser r ' ,' 141/4 Rd and Pacific Hwy • , 5� ,.-, �El. r . .�.; ' �r 4,111°- 4icsii il • 53rd Ave shuttle:a micro-bus shuttle along SW 53rd Ave ' •-;� + r. :: V,...i V Ridership projections for the 53rd Avenue Station do not _ ' .�R # t` PORTLAND-=COMMUNITY COLLEGE assume any potential shuttle service to PCC.However,it ,' `. . ,: � ■' : sYA OA CAMPUS brings value and supports other goals to improve transit { ,. : "' •.� � . . r" •''. �.. i access and coverage. In this case,a shuttle may help promote 1- :e. � - ,A. comfortable and convenient access between the 53rd Avenue ' 4' 4 1. F'"' _- r-,, w• • `� � .' "--7- , Station and the PCC campus at a significantly lower cost than :* "- rJ v'- - y r y_y • other mechanized options explored. •:��; *:. `• �" �" '° LEGEND - _ ■ _ '` ,,4 ,., _ +R Since the DEIS,partners analyzed both potential shuttle -�\ +_. .. . . - 1 �' options.The analysis considered capacity,travel time, di AV Stop PCC Shuttle Stop Nt Mr J' ,t '' �"t distance traveled,redundancy with transit service,frequency, _ ® r x'r- _ Y ;:" ' AV Service PCC Shuttle Service �`i' r r: M +'• . .-.!•,.-`'.. ,:' . support for PCC's campus vision,fixed schedule versus *_ on-demand service,and capital,operations and maintenance ® TriMet Bus Stop .r costs.In all metrics,the SW 53rd Ave shuttle outperformed — TriMet Bus Service -%, _ , :' 4',, A Al -:� the BTC-68th Ave shuttle,providing the best support for Figure 6.10.1 DRAFT circulation route of a potential shuttle from PCC to 53rd Avenue Station THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. 7 DESIGN CONCEPTS : TIGARD & TUALATIN 147 DESIGN CONCEPTS:TIGARD&TUALATIN. . . . 146 7.1 Project Highlights 148 7.2 Moving Around Tigard and Tualatin 149 Neighborhood Access 153 7.3 1-5 and Pacific Hwy/99W Crossing 156 7.4 68th Parkway Station 158 7.5 SW 70th Ave Street Design 162 7.6 Elmhurst Street Station 164 7.7 OR-217 Crossing 168 7.8 Hall Boulevard Station 170 Operations and Maintenance Facility 174 7.9 Bonita Road Station 176 7.10 Upper Boones Ferry Road Station 180 7.11 Bridgeport Transit Center Station 184 41111( ,y y IC y q O C o s. J � a - • d06 ' CoN v v h .00` F c cTH• )a � � y -o co cN .., N p o II ,L , U -cOo O UU _y La_ oJ N 'p ` 8LLoU U- NRO NL -O Q 0a Gen d CC > O y O O O = No. -O I tev� j O 1COO C) o O C) C a/ p Lb +„ . t a0 - ""•NJ c CO • • '^ ~ ea a .y� '�gy V m a c , C a2 • � � � i f—_ f0 .- on -13 I +:�S2nCu .\:,0e>,144rn - r..' �tr aa1�M5 e`�y . 3 d V�FSGom�°� T 01s • .11 CO N Co 1 0 C)N '= _• — N N L cQ _ o U aN •Q -O a Co + C co co Q) Cl_ CoV al CC V) Q Y co i EW aO)co OC) • a) o Q � CC EON QO_ NO UaNN > Z G v O• L '� aS Up)29O a _ 2 Uaa) t O Q ... O a) C V) O U co 0 2 O .,_, N o_1- Cr '— V) = O O- • a _c O . co E N c F— Ll cu - ' m .`—' ai - co W N c0 co , Y H CO a) Q O N C a) O)a N o N W a)- E co Z Z '.'- - a) .O N C c Oo 0) .. c0 E W y E �) d @ C (o y h N a) a) Z a) 2 W 03 m Q! 0, CL r U •C OO > d Y > Q Q V) Z Y 7� c Z v — c o c O co N Cl) as m 0 I— a `o Z R C N m Q) = U 0 Q '� c C ._+ C L LY a v O - O '2 OU • ) y m a) n .c oN c a) c 'a) O `° n co Z m o Cf) <O = O c6 c9 cL) U C �i c ¢J [..) N Q > O O W ) O_ C.) �) — 7 C'C a Q) C U O- C CO O W O 0 < C)L J a) a) W H O 0 C— m., O 00 .-� C., cu J ~ _C C = Q c .._. -) c E o U .0 3 o c > N n c 'J m -c '0 Q 01 o _ c a/ T CC L a CO 1------ C ce °) c°p 0 8 N C (o c0, Lu o a) O a) C O a0 o"a n'- a) c o N H a - Q C)) -05_c - az a3 co Q U E, J R C L C .00.N d C O) a3— Cn c N- Z a3 CC Q a CO H 0 +-� C Q U a3 O W O_)'(O C .� c@ LJJ V) o 1— O ceC• =, C . a cu = LUa U w ~ � oa Ea o Q _ <° .o m'_' -o H o ._ N Q c) o `m > c H c c C7 U a, ayi .� `a3 m E c- .<n H w -0 3 5 cn w �) '- .0 a) O co cm) a) J , J w C CO-O L C m C W Z Cl) U U C a) a) ~ d.— cC a) C C CT O U c N c C a) 2 m v a3 t C 7 a a3 O Y •.' W Z m C -0_ co Q o E C= .-+ D a) /� O E '— Z U a) Z V/ a y O ai Z 0 a o Y c a E X m a) ->. 0 a) = m V ) otl c Q c a o o a). ¢ a) ct .J CC — On `o c E-E U... i,= 1- Z C t Y ` m z o `° CI) 3 Y "' °' is 0 U ca d)CS)'v) m a CO C) Z aa) o -- as a) o a a) > cc) V CD . a ac c • a3-0a) LIJ-) Q o_ n as Co c in .> CO w E c j c as O-O cco o . ' w 3 c c 3 v Z Co V, 3 > WC-) n N Q 0r • 3 0 3 H m a) c <7, 0 p a) a3 o a) >c a x 'X a)cu _,L w -a O- W t Oi _a O '-' C U O Z }. N Z a) N a) Z m co Q c) 2 d iu ': :ti 0 01 a) c 00 er r 7.2 Moving Around Tigard and Tualatin = �` ACCESSING THE STATION — - �' 4 = w r and upgrading intersections.An enhanced 70th Ave '� .. .-.4 .7-4----- .',.�x • Park&Rides located at 68th Parkway, Hall Boulevard, = V"' "-"` {"' '-•-,- streetscape will improve walking and biking within theT. and Bridgeport Transit Center Stations are expected Tigard Triangle to and from the station. \ , �/ to have the greatest mix of walk,transfer and auto +fir .Y - . �,. t. activities. Seamless access improvements require close coordination • • Hall Boulevard Station,located just south of between all Project Partners. Southwest Corridor Light •s Downtown Tigard,will connect riders to Downtown Rail Project Station Access planning has been developed ' , - :_ Tigard,Tigard Transit Center,and the WES Commuter in concert with Tigard's Transportation System Plan � . . - Rail Station. (TSP)and regional trail planning.A list of partner-led -` "— r:, , F. • Elmhurst Street Station is centrallylocated in Tigard Station Access projects for improving pedestrian and ? y^' y- b bicycle access in Tigard and Tualatin is on the following / _- - a. . Triangle,and is envisioned to serve a growing mixed page. Note that not all projects currently have associated use neighborhood.A majority of riders are expected budgets and schedules.Some of these projects may be to arrive at the station on foot from within the Tigard �`�� constructed in conjunction with the light rail project,while Triangle. -mss iff,,.. .. others will be constructed after opening day. • Where light rail runs through the Tigard employment Tigard Employment Corridor corridor alongside the railroad right-of-way,a majority The design concepts included in this chapter show a small WIV71 '"'`` .` ''il of transit riders will arrive at stations by foot from area plan for each location with all projects included in the , - nearby neighborhoods and employment areas. current Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project funding.A ' • For each station, project partners are exploring the "functional plan"shows how each station contributes to best locations where passenger drop-off can be access for walking,biking,transit,and driving,and how the provided. station fits into its existing context. IMPROVING TRANSIT ACCESS - • An inventory of bicycle and pedestrian conditions on blocks adjacent to each station has identified the following - challenges in Tigard and Tualatin: /' i 1, 1 I ! 1 • Local streets that are unpaved or lack sidewalks. '�� • Streets with a high number of traffic lanes,a high . ti 4. . ..i posted speed limit,and no buffer between the sidewalk and moving vehicles. it- rpm' • Limited locations where pedestrians and cyclists can _ '1111 = cross Pacific Hwy/99W, I-5,and OR-217, Fanno Creek, I t I ? ' it ,, fit it.t.111`1 and the Pacific and Western railroad line. -: _- "__.._ - d "h t c • At grade rail crossings. .,,,.0 , I ,� . III iii ir The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project addresses these conditions by reducing distances between crosswalks Tualatin Retail • 150 r '° TIGARD AND TUALATIN: -{ ; 2035 STATION RIDERSHIP - - � �___. G. •� Ashcreek Source:Metro,2019 d `', 30th J . F 68TH , ' '` The half-mile walkshed around each i 41 ‘111) 4,900 Projected Daily Trips !: station defines what destinations 4Barbur Transit n er 0 41 Percent Walk 0 0 r can be walked to in 10 minutes. CI 40 Percent Transfer Bike Use: . . -- ' West Portland . ;.' 19 Percent Auto Low Metzger 68th �' T53rd i �` O Park . . ELMHURST �` x' .ti I 3,900 Projected Daily Trips �: ►"`�"' ' Far Southw�sf 4�0 Downtown ® 99 Percent Walk • � - Tigard e l Percent Transfer Bike Use: 0 Percent Auto Low \` Hall Elmhurst .r.---,-' L The three-mile bikeshed reflects tall) HALL Bonita s the boundary of study for bicycle 5,500 Projected Daily TripsX access to transit. •`� 0 46 Percent Walk ' 42 Percent Transfer Bike Use: i _w_ 12 Percent Auto High `.6__ _ __? Bonita Lake Forest BONITA The dashed catchment area reflects 0 Upper Boones Ferry • ; de j 2,300 Projected Daily Trips • where people would likely bike to • ® 73 Percent Walk CO or from a station. I/\I ) Q 27 Percent Transfer Bike Use: 0 Percent Auto Low -, am 'I Bridgeport Transit Center UPPER BOONES FERRY + � • I .;� �'"��;,:,{.'�'+� F , ' Bryant 1,300 Projected Daily Trips 4�'� mIr� 0 ® 100 Percent Walk • r7 Bike Use: Downtown •'� BIKING TO THE STATION 0 Percent Transfer , Although biking is not included in the ridership 0 Percent Auto Low ► - . Tualatin '\ calculations,stations will attract cyclists as future transit ti riders from the surrounding area,typically in a three-mile BRIDGEPORT TRANSIT CENTER i range.Various factors may limit how far riders are likely ' to travel,including:viable streets for biking,terrain,rider 7,800 Projected Daily Trips !,a behavior,comfort,station proximity and direction of travel. O 23 Percent WalkNidr 4 O. 7 1' TriMet and project partners will assess these factors 0 50 Percent Transfer Bike Use: to help prioritize investments and identify missing links air:- p p Y 9 27 Percent Auto Medium •T.. across the corridor. iib A tet_ �.. STATION ACCESS AND PARTNER PROJECTS / -- r� The following map shows the location and geographic Metzgerr`68th O ' ---N .4 /r"/ extent for additional Southwest Corridor Light Rail r' Station Access projects. Projects are highlighted that 1 �� r help to increase connectivity to light rail stations. Station Access Projects have advanced through the Shared s// Investment Strategy are included in the FEIS, but not the Gro, project budget.These could be designed and built by the nuo- f\ J Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project(TriMet), if other �Fsc a }I [O sources of funding are secured. 4,1, P/''pdr ' o_Tigard � m wntown Elmhurst L This map also includes relevant local projects led entirely - - , by local jurisdictions.These projects will be coordinated O with,and helpto inform station area decisions.These si . 49 St.Anthony's 0� .� Oak Creek projects are planned,funded,designed and constructed catholic �� ,. by others,and are not part of the Southwest Corridor Church ,Q, Q Light Rail Project. More information on these projects is available on the website of each project lead. FaS creek Park SW McDonald St ~ 1 / \ Kruse Way ,7\: Bonit'a` Park S z. Boni Bonita J� cac�a'pc lit, - Ot' ' Lake Grove Upper Boones Ferry j/.0 SW Durham Rdl 0 t yes Tigard 1 e��o High School .i \,o° Bryant Cook Park Tua/t,,2R�V Bridgeport Transit Center er zi) .110eip.) L_____/ Figure 7.2.1 Station Access and Partner Projects 0 0' 1000' 2000' 4000' to downtown Tualatin 152 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT STATION ACCESS PROJECTS — PARTNER-LED PROJECTS — ® Barbur/PCC to Triangle Connection Q New Red Rock Creek Trail e Baylor Sidewalks Q New extension of SW Atlanta St to SW 70th Ave ® 72nd Sidewalks&Bikeway O New extension of SW 70th Ave from SW Elmhurst St to Beveland St Hall Sidewalks • 72nd Ave Corridor Study(City of Tigard TSP 4/ Bonita Sidewalks&Bikeway 2035) e Carman Sidewalks&Bikeway 0 Dartmouth Roadway Improvement(City of Tigard TSP 2035) CO Lower Boones Ferry&Boones Ferry Bikeway • Extension of Fanno Creek Trail e OR-217 Multi-use Pathway Q Upper Boones Ferry Rd road widening(City of Tigard TSP 2035) © OR99W:1-5-McDonald St Repaving Project (ODOT) 153 NEIGHBORHOOD ACCESS Note: Further traffic circulation studies and pedestrian crossing The following diagrams show the proposed vehicular opportunities on Pacific Hwy/99W between SW 68th and 64th Ave will a' circulation for Tigard and Tualatin,which highlights be refined over the course of project development and final engineering. possible traffic mitigations, new or modified signals and design of intersections to support u-turns and turning SW Oak St movements adjacent to the project alignment. New CD `n NB 0vd • enhanced pedestrian crossings will be added throughout a' l 5 SW gaCb�l8 the project,significantly improving the pedestrian safety and crossing opportunities along the alignment. New r enhanced pedestrian crossing treatment types will N r —' continue to be explored as a valuable measure in providing increased pedestrian safety and permeability across major `��' N streets.Additional crossings also benefit access to new 0 SB and improved bike facilities built by the project. .1'tr' 68th s Park& o II m yL Ride o U 03 Tit- N 03 N- T C/) SW Pfaffle St \\\'2`6 G 017; °' ill Co 1/40 N e5e5 N � SW Atlanta St N SCALE:NOT TO SCALE SW Baylor St LEGEND —+- C..,f Existing MAX Station O Proposed Light Rail Station + 4- 4'r' Allowable Turn Movements SW Clinton St Re-routed Turn Movements -ii Possible Diversion Routes (TBD) Hwy 217 a' a' • New Traffic Signal -0 SW Dartmouth St Replaced/ Modified Traffic Signal A. • New Enhanced Pedestrian-only Cros: c, New Gated Rail Crossing 1'. t— — Proposed Road Closure 3W Knoll Dr SW Elmhurst St )1. U-Turn Restricted Elmhurst Note: Diagram does not indicate existing fts. � signalized intersections to remain. ■ Figure 7.2.2 Proposed Neighborhood Access and Circulation 154 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT .~ �,..� N. �� * - ' `� SW Elmhurst St 11 G. l N t-[ _ SWKnollDr Qa• \ s� sic Elmhurst °P� \\ I Tigard WTC O'/, `4L S � Station �°r�,• cu spy � ,. /dVsr< Hall N st, Hwy 217 a' a' �G y • Park& yv, �� 0,,�� Ride ke e, 'Si c `�? �'�0 �� Operations and N mMaintenance SW Hampton St Facility z • cn 0,`. Tigard0. City Hall °' \\4 _i,_...igilli. 3 . fp ,. . 0, .. ___, _ _ ... . Tigard Public SCALE:NOT TO SCA Library LEGEND t_1 Existing MAX Station Fanno Creek O Proposed Light Rail Station Park �Tr' Allowable Turn Movements -r Re-routed Turn Movements SW Tech Center Dr --i, Possible Diversion Routes (TBD) 0 New Traffic Signal SW McDonald St _ Replaced/ Modified Traffic Signal • New Enhanced Pedestrian-only Cros: _of *.,r _} New Gated Rail Crossing ,� ,.ill � • — Proposed Road Closure fi. U-Turn Restricted Note: Diagram does not indicate existing signalized intersections to remain. Figure 7.2.3 Proposed Neighborhood Access and Circulation 155 . es °°� 46 cLa 1-5 �§ ett� • SW Bonita Rd s� 0 F Bonita 6 O/ ` 1-5 a CCS CNI a �; a' - 1 ID N cr ai C/) `, ^ Cn 5(. yes. aC\ `� • Ga. a Bridgeport Transit Center P. ark& if g Ot��a PRide SCALE:NOT TO SCALE l Cr) R, �t\ao' S\,C\ LEGEND \T\'' �s co`'' �e0et `�1� # ( ) Existing MAX Station A� ��"`� �, ��, 0 Proposed Light Rail Station •Upper Boones Ferry 4'r' Allowable Turn Movements i Re-routed Turn Movements •-� Possible Diversion Routes (TBD) yes • New Traffic Signal �'RP �� Replaced/ Modified Traffic Signal �Q,Qe`�Q-a • New Enhanced Pedestrian-only Cros: 0 0 �I C) New Gated Rail Crossing s�� — Proposed Road Closure G~hd� U Turn Restricted �d Note: Diagram does not indicate existing signalized intersections to remain. r Figure 7.2.4 Proposed Neighborhood Access and Circulation Figure 7.2.5 Proposed Neighborhood Access and Circulation 156 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT , . I I P • i I i 7.3 1-5 and Pacific Hwy/99W Crossing 1 I I fi IIEntering into Tigard,the alignment crosses over 1-5,then T I drops below Pacific Hwy/99W between the existing 1-5 � � l Southbound off-ramp and Pacific Hwy/99W.The alignment I I emerges in Tigard on the south side of Pacific Hwy/99W I Iat 68th Parkway Station. While these improvements L Baxter I shift the I-5 off ramps,it does not reduce lanes on Pacific I Auto = Hartmann Motors, Hwy/99W.The project will restripe lanes on Pacific PartsI Inc. ; Hwy/99W between the 5 ramps and SW 68th Pkwy,to v accommodate the underpass for light rail.The project I I des rsection Aveito reconfigure crossings.The City ►►`"►��""`„ improvepedestrianY Tigard, -- JODOT,TriMet and Washington County continue to discuss -- — . iii -- the feasibility of a mid block crossing near SW Coronado , — — ,,, ` St to provide additional safer crossings of Pacific Hwy/ �_ 99W between SW 64th Ave and SW 68th Pkwy. Designs ,��►►v►►Pa�;f,c\-wo W - will be refined over the course of project development �� and final engineering. 0 Potential project implementation of ;%'/ c 3 a enhanced pedestrian mid-block crossing •', O (Approvals required by ODOT and City of a 5 NB • J Tigard) ® I-5 SB On Ramp lirilli i/ ��op p n / •amp(\ �/ sWCoronad�s� STATION FEATURES . "I �� ►► , �— �',-%'�� Light rail underpass at Pacific Hwy/99W and SW iiill Coronado St p y .-- ---------;00 %--`'J.i'� ® All crosswalks retained r— it v4:-.4100, 1 _li All traffic lanes retained _f ® Connection to existing bike route for NB Barbur/across 1-5 ,i I Platform ——— Project Boundary 0 Landscape Track 101°4 * Potential Stormwater Crossing Gate Treatment Existing Right-of-Way New/Improved Sidewalk m New/Improved Li I Roadway 0 New/Enhanced Signal P Shared Transitway Pedestrian Ballasted Track Crossing • Potential Bike Parking Substation I gs Potential Bus Stop Imo` Il I 111 IMP. r i Figure 7.3.1 DRAFT Pacific Hwy/99W at SW 64th Ave Plan o• zs• so• 100' A 157 4. _ t , rr r• - r �' � k r./ - 53r� • _., .._... _ x: , .. . ..,....... _. . ....., ._ . 44. v ,. •'Nr"...-I` ...r.' . :: '--tA-ve,i, -----.- L ,......t 0,..0 1 .''r r' • I:t v y 5)*Ike.'' -. '..'15i -- ..4112V -'-r-:---', .1 .. ---- -. " v. •.- • .„.„,.t.,,-, -,....„-- . . __•-•. . .., ....- • • - ,w. . .1--.. if,..,,,,a• . re w •• • • ....:3L- , ,H-.i -7,-, '„ -- 'adv. . .-s 'i'' 41' ','. . ',. :.0)--.t- 0'119914 ji,-. ..,:-, A _- - I .- .• .. •,.. _.,. .. ...• . . •,,c • .......... . ,, ..,_ ,..,_. , ., • . • • ., w- ,0 . , _ .. , $,.. k .. 4: . :'... ..,...•. r::� • i e'ir 4 ' s ` ' Ill 'z r iti �3: ci .t.- Ate:.`� n. ' it i 'w t, - •1 Y- f .Z •� sT d ; 1 �. s a r ' 1 • itii . .. *.-:*(' ' .4 ,• .. , - • .. ... if c.„,, . _ . ..„. ....., .r ' '. -it • • ..A. - . . •.....,,, ,44.41. cr F - • 1 A� e� 1� ; '� � ,fir\ - �. �at f 'r.S �r• 1(400 's .: ,;..� Figure 7.3.2 1-5 and Pacific Hwy/99W Crossings aerial overview 158 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 7.4 68th Parkway Station 0 4,900 Projected Daily Trips �x,r, ;'. 4. 'rte' — " `��` 4. x ®41 Percent Walk �� .`" � -" "l�:_ ',` ' .• 40 Percent Transfer t M y ' 7 ■+1,rr - �' 19 Percent Auto Bike Use: is Ni,j�c + .. - - '-1 ;'fps►w« Low .r r .. • Locatedon thesouth sideof Pacific Hwy/99W,thestation's - .--. tc .+"tt.l.t � _ X7" ' ac c y/ , stat o s r - » s i ` '-•r: prominent presence atop a natural amphitheater above Red t ,.'•- +r. . ' �� Rock Creek provides views over the Tualatin Valley and Red r,� '�. .3 , ° `�i -- 7 _ � �x Rock Creek watershed. 68th Parkway Station acts as the t,, �, - `b " ..v,044.-,-- �+ 7461,0.4._2„_-, 1 __ portal into the burgeoning Tigard Triangle neighborhood. . _� 200 . 4.'•= - it-;:::,,,,27.7. '% 'f fi ` s �.r.,. Sidewalk improvements and improved pedestrian crossings ; on Pacific Hwy/99W at SW 68th Pkwy and SW 64th Ave :. A -"s-` . ' `` c ::-. 4,(-Z:-''', rrl; 7 connect the station to the residential areas to the north. � F,. _ Adjacent bus stops and a surface Park&Ride with up to y 350 spaces will enable quick and easy transfers for people . _ ' ' `+{ ? coming from King City,Sherwood and other communities -- ' :;.,_; ��"' . r;, 't ' • '• I ..• southwest of Tigard. - -. �,' • PROJECT BENEFITS e ' . f r • '-----1," Q MOVE AND CONNECT PEOPLE • "`T - • ," 11 • Two improved pedestrian connections across Pacific _ — �.,., ri - _:•' Hwy/99W Improved connections across Pacific Serves established nei hborhoods Views to Red Rock Creek natural • Planned connections to bus lines 93 and 94 p p g area and Tualatin River Valley and 4 Hwy/99W facilitate bus transfers to the north of Pacific Hwy/99W and emphasis unique topography • New Park&Ride with convenient access to I-5&Pacific and neighborhood access the emerging Tigard Triangle surrounding of unique n tcopography ntext Hwy/99W Figure 7.4.1 DRAFT 68th Parkway Station Vision 0 MAINTAIN AND CREATE EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES • Helps support the vision of the Tigard Triangle Plan DESIGN VALUES:APPLYING COMMUNITY FEEDBACK IN ONGOING DESIGN • Access to Metzger neighborhood and emerging mixed- • Architectural design of station,structural elements,and stormwater facilities should frame existing views,emphasize use community in the Tigard Triangle's employment and the adjacent natural resources of Red Rock Creek,and have a clear presence on Pacific Hwy/99W residential center • Type,size and location of Park&Ride will be finalized to support access to transit,address vehicular circulation,and • Access to planned Red Rock Creek Trail support potential development opportunities 0 PRESERVE AND RESTORE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT • The station shall have safe pedestrian and bicycle facilities that help improve station access from the neighborhoods on each side of Pacific Hwy/99W • Views to Red Rock Creek natural area and Tualatin River Valley and emphasis of unique topography surrounding • Intersection design at SW 64th Ave and SW 68th Pkwy to provide safe crossing of Pacific Hwy/99W to facilitate station context comfortable access between residential neighborhoods, businesses,bus stops and the station. Coordination with ODOT Repaving Project along Pacific Hwy/99W ongoing • Stormwater treatment for station area and Park&Ride • Thoughtful design of light rail structure and site design to emphasize the portal of Tigard Triangle • Design to facilitate transit-oriented development consistent with Tigard's strategic vision to maximize walking and transit ridership,attract private sector investment,advance project affordable housing goals and support Metro's 2040 Town Center land use vision 159 PROJECT SCOPE ; LJL.,1 ILI > d Potential project ��, r ❑ a q • 68th Parkway Station and light rail infrastructure implementation of Q a b L Streetscape improvements,including enhanced pedestrian mid- _.Q 0 ; • Light rail tunnel under Pacific Hwy/99W and SW �� _• sidewalks on the south side of Pacific block crossing(Approvals o 0 a co f Coronado St Hwy/99W and traffic/bike lane restriping required by ODOT and City of the roadway of Tigard) LP Light rail underpass • Short-term and long-term bike parking J .--•-- ..:1 ;" r ! �� Q of Pacific Hwy/99W • Revised bus stop routing and stop locations IR Bus pull out adjacent .� I �' �� G Buster's ❑ and SW Coronado St • Surface Park&Ride with up to 350 parking spaces to station H Pacific ;� RegencyInn .. )•• . • • .. • Streetscape improvements along south side of , lk1�'' •• ••�•• Pacific Hwy/99W between SW 68th Parkway and SW Q • Gators ►......... Ave I-- U ..... •—SW Coronado SES 4 • Streetscape improvements along SW 68th Parkway C --j T : • • • ''` •y � —, :Wirg �I t, between Pacific Hwy/99W and Red Rock Creek � ••.... 4 \t 68th L _ � ��r / / ! eir ' ir i ::r. b Substation i:.; r] /.4114" LI I © Viewpoint of station vision rendering �°� �� ' ' New or Enhanced Project Elements Existing Assets Qac , III! Ro adway Multifamily : ; Figure 7.4.4 ' ' Sidewalk Employment — ' 0 New/Enhanced Signal Retail Bridge .S. across Red ° ��,�Gated Crossing Existing Trail u-Haul Rock Creek • NM Crosswalk Signal at S oragi = r �, Enhanced Ped. major road _ o\ 100' zoo aoo j Crossingiim Crosswalk(s) � — _ Project Feature at major road = �! : f / -- • — Figure 7.4.2 DRAFT 68th Parkway Station Overview AI /ii ir 01111 Iv el . �� 000 000 8 8 t ,."-y•—t, • film._ _ u� mc•� o UM eft l 1 --'41 4di ' Ili f fl AIM Travel Lane Bike Lane Sidewalk Pathway Light Rail Platform Trackway Light Rail Platform Ramp Park&Ride Figure 7.4.3 DRAFT 68th Parkway Station Cross Section 0' 5' 10' 20' 160 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT -- 1I I - Shell Gator's , Pub and Eatery — it / ♦ Q i i% ' i ..''''''1°.— 6 / SW Coronado St Banning's Potential project implementation of ...._00,\,,, y enhanced pedestrian mid-block crossing osi Restaurant8 col Pie House (Approvals required by ODOT and City of / �� Tigard) / r♦ `o 0000 � t9■� ac\�\�N��° �I�Ill�ml� O �' ` riiirrliairr y , 0 � ce/ ala 61,, , ,�� r• ii " �� / / •■ Substation /j S, 1 "'11111/44r,/ / / I / ._ ._ - / I© // / IIII IIIII I STATION FEATURES ® bo building llocat on s z///11 (/ I� I IIII IIIII IIIII ....:. I 1Q Split platforms O Future connection to Red, 7/ ) // j T a �� Light rail underpass below Rock Creek Trail / g ® Pacific Hwy/99W and SW _ _ 4 La out of surface Park Ih Coronado St Y I IIIII &Ride to work with � '.." — El 68th tedPkwy and enable future TOD �y /� I�l III IIIII ®Pick-up/Drop-off opportunities / Surface Park&Ride �/ / I II ( J / with up to 350 spaces — 5®Bus Pullout gQ Acessible ramp to 11 '` f I station + _ — I 'w Platform ——— Project Boundary O III I 1 '. , ^ 111 111 w = Landscape Track ,11 _ Potential Stormwater __— Crossing Gate _ `^ * Treatment IIII - III — Existing Right-of-Way I New/Improved New/Improved �� 1111 I I I I Sidewalk Roadway New/Enhanced V• v Signal Shared Transitway J - - e. Ballasted Track m # III I IIII Pedestrian \ ._ i�ID� _ . Crossing • Potential Bike Parking \ \ Potential Bus Stop Figure 7.4.4 DRAFT 68th Parkway Station Plan;Design is conceptual and will be further developed through community engagement and technical design efforts 0' 25' 50' 100' 161 STATION ACCESS PROJECTS U- 1' i I _-____ -MO _ SW Pine St - ▪®- Barbur/PCC to Triangle Connection* v -f — Baylor Sidewalks* XI; lit _e_ 72nd Ave Sidewalks&Bikeway , TR • ► 91 csj, y `N ail � . _ I © . PARTNER-LED PROJECTS ;r r'. .$tk r -0- New Red Rock Creek Trail '. O_ -' ,, Fred -0- New extension of SW Atlanta St to SW 70th Ave* Meyer ��6 ` _ Qac\F\�. LW. __ _— 72nd Ave Corridor Study(City of Tigard TSP -O- 2035) • -©— 0R99W:1-5-McDonald St Repaving Project (ODOT) U-Haul *These projects are located within the 1/2 mile walkshed of the station,but are not storage � ysi O captured within the maps extents 0 t� 1'o Tigard Business ® Center 111 0' 100' 200400' A Figure 7.4.5 68th Parkway Station Access Projects and Potential Partnering 1/2 Mile Station Walkshed 100/200/400'from Station FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES Based on station area context, project partners will explore the following: There is estimated demand within the station area for the following private mobility services: New Transit-Oriented Places Adapting Park&Rides Mobility solutions can be integrated into Mobility solutions may be introduced into ® Electric Bike/Scooter Share a Circulator Shuttles imm ,m11 buildings at the ground floor,in a parking dedicated Park&Rides,such as pick-up/ garage or associated landscaped area. , drop-off zones or space for other mobility e5 Bike share(Dockless) 0 Carshare services. TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Public Realm Terracing of the Park&Ride as well as parcels on the west side of SW Mobility solutions may be integrated in 68th Parkway will help facilitate future development in close proximity to an area set aside for stormwater needs, systems buildings or hardscaped plaza. the station. Future development around the station is within walking distance of a Fred Meyer store and other retail on Pacific Hwy/99W and will have access to the future Red Rock Creek trail. Planning for development opportunities will continue to be explored in collaboration with the City of Tigard. See Chapter 4.12 for a complete list of mobility partnering opportunities. 162 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 7.5 SW 70th Ave Street Design - Sk = l `" =:Lit. it SW 70th Ave is a central,shared multimodal spine in an S ' emerging mixed-use neighborhood,connecting SW Elmhurst I c,�I � �_ St to Red Rock Creek trail,and to the Tigard Lake Oswego ,s' - Regional Trail.A side-running light rail and integrated / Qac,`° McDonald's _ f . streetscape improvements will contribute value to the desired �r I = ` --- . , neighborhood aesthetics of the Triangle. Pedestrian and bike - - _ , ;' connections extend through this prominent new corridor, + r _ LL �., x bringing pedestrian safety improvements,a tree-lined street - - • igard usin s and an entirelynew shared street bike connection. j `` < ce ter r_ � l�. I G� cee� i I.� ,'a/ 4. Oreg. . • PROJECT BENEFITS I �ed�° 111 '� Edu ation Q MOVE AND CONNECT PEOPLE It Associ. in • New SW 70th Ave street extension through the center of _• _ �• • the Tigard Triangle - _ _ sw Atiant�_: • New bike and walk facilities along SW 70th Ave and �� TriMet and City of Tigard/ a� n (7 Ems'•.. discussing potential SW 70th Ave I r •7 • sidewalk improvements along SW Baylor St and SW Regal Extension to future SW Atlanta St I� Clinton St L�Tigard , +ll n (` o O F MAINTAIN AND CREATE EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES l w L� L • Supports the street network and connectivityvision of r� 1 SW Baylor St Pp I I the Tigard Triangle Plan and the Tigard Lean Code ir _ _ r v 1 a • Design of light rail guideway and improved street quality WinCo PetSmart Street regrading and r] enhance the experience of people walking and biking i—.__ _ _I_ _: 163 , 111111111111111111111111111111.1111111.111111111111"." .5,,• iiC Ytr -N '`�(' MIL 1■■■■■ ' it , ■■■■ ^ I� Ir - - W A '-'4017.4 --IAI ,, * NiEnT IMF- f '-'114/ 4filit"' ilk -11..r!-- ' ,t 004,,Yeat, 4.‘1, '.44i.*it - ' W1441) I oll 44' ' . Red Rock Creek )� Red Rock Creek Trail 0' 8' 16' 32' Figure 7.5.2 DRAFT Red Rock Creek Crossing Cross Section Expansion - A U 000 000 - - 0 It qie`',Ii It t,r,�1 I a o 1 Mil MINIM ilitlek. ii i 1 —11Sidewalk SW 70th Ave Trackway Sidewalk 0' 4' 8' 16' Shared Street Bike Facilities - Figure 7.5.3 DRAFT SW 70th Ave At-grade Light Rail Section north of SW Clinton St ° 000 000 0 9 c(7, FD7 cTi li)J o 0 o I i Parking Sidewalk SW 70th Ave Trackway 0' 4' 8' 16' Shared Street Bike Facilities — Figure 7.5.4 DRAFT SW 70th Ave Light Rail Abutment Section north of SW Elmhurst St 1 64 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 7.6 Elmhurst Street Station 0 3,900 Projected Daily Trips • - 0 99 Percent Walk to 3 P•..-e• -. .: .pp '1 .:.• Q 1 Percent Transfer f , Bike Use: i �!!r 0 Percent Auto row C�� - e Located at the heart of the Tigard Triangle,the station is _ � . a central magnet supporting mobility in all directions for te - l - '=`-� the growing number of residents and workers in this mixed - 1 _ , SII use neighborhood. Street improvements near the station vS . .*"r`. 9 P rs '�. 1 , will promote safe and convenient access to mixed use • - -., neighborhoods and regional trails. µ ,.1,';. Ir ;r, . .- .. nag • �. . .., :e t 41'4 -ft wag PROJECT BENEFITS J � E . it ! rl ,111 Ali .io N -V , Q MOVE AND CONNECT PEOPLEliv - . .1:'. "'~ �'? - • New bike and pedestrian facilities along SW 70th Ave 'f _ --max• 1 . _t .,-,-,.,„„:,,,• r • Planned connections to bus line 78 and 97 ".. •• =„ �•• 0 MAINTAIN AND CREATE EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES .fi•r ..- ' : • Helps support the mixed-use vision of the Tigard _- Triangle Plan { � � • Access to planned Red Rock Creek Trail ' o PRESERVE AND RESTORE NATURAL ENVIRONMENTCentrally located in the Tigard Streetscape improvements on Street improvements on Elmhurst Triangle,the station provides transit efff~~~ Elmhurst St and SW 70th Ave • Enhanced tree canopyand stormwater treatment along �p St and SW 70th Ave enhanceal pedestrian and bicycle connectivity orientation to the emerging mix of will increase the tree canopy and SW Elmhurst St uses integrate stormwater Figure 7.6.1 DRAFT Elmhurst Street Station Vision DESIGN VALUES:APPLYING COMMUNITY FEEDBACK IN ONGOING DESIGN • Stormwater facilities should be integrated to enhance station area • Intersection design to facilitate safe comfortable pedestrian crossings and look for opportunities to eliminate crossing gates • Platform configuration will be explored to enhance public space and improve access • Design to facilitate transit-oriented development consistent with Tigard's strategic vision to maximize walking and transit ridership,attract private sector investment,advance project affordable housing goals and support Metro's 2040 Town Center land use vision 165 PROJECT SCOPE - _ 4 01: ii • Elmhurst Street Station and light rail infrastructure ii�L ..'—:—"-.1!-..-11771 • SW Elmhurst St streetscape improvements between SW—onSt "'�"'. i ± p p \ l n Inn _under constr SW 70th Ave and SW 72nd Ave and intersecting I i 1 Medical • improvements Street improvements c) a l Offices Short-term and long-term bike parking (see tables ---_-_ along SW 70th Ave - below for recommendations on number of spaces -�__ ----._ j (see Section 7.5) D 0 ��_ for opening day) ----�_ _ • Revised bus stop routing and stop locations .--� ¢' Bridge over SW_________-Nr- Dartmouth St Dartmouth St _ New street improvements to _ , SW Elmhurst St T I = I I ip I v I II Wal mart I Cr. I " J hu .. V Viewpoint of station vision rendering I • 1 Red Rock Creek Trail mhuirst I - 10 New or Enhanced Project Elements Existing Assets v To Re 1 Roadway Multifamily 111' 1i1111r11rr r i Figure 7.6.4 • �t r1�\. � �i Tigard • 4 Sidewalk Employment \Bridge over OR 217 Ce ter Q New/Enhanced Signal Retail �+ crossing Gates 1a , Gated Crossing Existing Trail j c • I '' NM Crosswalk Signal at rip--_� V 1 1 n { ] u i I� Enhanced Ped. Q major road _ _ u i n' 7.— Crossing Crosswalk(s) Lin- u o ,oa=zoa li 400' at major road u Li Project Feature 1 l• Ii N _r. I -ii Figure 7.6.2 DRAFT Elmhurst Street Station overview I \ / - --ThROW I ROW ilk - d � miiimmak I I opo opo t i �� z-o( i' i �iT11 1 b 1 Sidewalk Travel Lane Turn Lane Travel Lane Storm water Trackway Light Rail Platform Trackway Sidewalk Figure 7.6.3 DRAFT Elmhurst Street Station Cross Section 0' 4' 8' 16' 166 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT I I , o Q Y 'L t 6 •I s. ill �pi, .,I�,, a ii 1. 1 " r -r - eNow. :, . • o 1 � p _ _ _ �,. O SW Elmhurst St 111 1 ® --sW--EitnlrTstSt �� I � � 0 ' 0 lig II I o ' r El 0 • _ r O7 _ i/ i ure 7.6.I STATION FEATURES Center platform iII W Improved SW Elmhurst St-rebuilt street,sidewalks and 1 r–T �• stormwater facilities 1 L-- 3® Improved street and streetscape along SW 70th Ave ------ ' ® Gated Crossing isi ' Potential systems building location ❑ ® Intersection designed for integration with future expansion of SW 70th Ave to the South D , , IF ,,,, ( ,i 1 Platform ——— Project Boundary a :5 50 00 Landscape Track Potential Stormwater CrossingGate �' n n �� Treatment Figure 7.6.4 DRAFT Elmhurst Street Station Plan;Design is conceptual and will be further developed through community engagement and technical design efforts ---- Existing Right-of-Way New/Improved Sidewalk m New/Improved Roadway ROW ROW II O New/Enhanced Shared Transitway ti ISignal �� PedestrianBallasted Track ,L ' IICrossing • Potential Bike Parking ® Potential Bus Stop lir , N��T'a1. I1 „"" r o0 0 0o eo 0 00 72ND INTERSECTION NOTES It I. ` I • SW 72nd Ave light rail crossing design to accommodate W AISMill ` ' future pedestrian and bicycle improvements in the SW Sidewalk Bike Gate SW 72nd Ave Gate Bike Sidewalk 72nd Avenue Corridor Study(City of Tigard TSP 2035) Figure 7.6.5 Section of SW 72nd Ave Crossing Gates 167 STATION ACCESS PROJECTS _I i Ill ji _m. Baylor Sidewalks* , r _e_ 72nd Sidewalks and Bikewayi +� II1 S'[v-a�ro®^ on _®i _ OR 217 Multi use Pathway — _ urhSr --_ ___ - __ -- -_ � 1— L. PARTNER-LED PROJECTS - ` 1 New extension of SW 70th Ave to Beveland -�- (South of SW Elmhurst St) N Q Q • -0- 72nd Ave Corridor Study(City of Tigard TSP *' p: 2035) up 4 Dartmouth Roadway Improvement(City of Walmart Q O SW Elmhurst St Tigard TSP 2035) *These projects are located within the 1/2 mile walkshed of the station,but are not Elmhurst captured within the maps extents 1.01i la i O I . , • 44 SwHerrposo way r — f 0' 100' 200' 400' As '�41.taTie-Wai-71-1-- Ii ai .... Figure 7.6.6 Elmhurst Street Station Access Projects and Potential Partnering C) 1/2 Mile Station Walkshed 100/200/400'from Station FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES Based on station area context, project partners will explore the following: There is estimated demand within the station area for the following private mobility services: New Transit-Oriented Places Adapting Existing Places Mobility solutions can be integrated into Property owners may work with the city ® Electric Bike/Scooter Share 0 Circulator Shuttles imm Ell buildings at the ground floor,in a parking . _ and mobility providers on solutions such garage or associated landscaped area. Om7- 168 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 7.7 OR-217 Crossing , illCostco The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project provides a cip/> ` .. critical new transit link between the Tigard Triangle and `�A.' 1 Downtown Tigard. MAX trains will travel from SW 72nd SW Dartmouth St i Ave in the Triangle to SW Hunziker St in Downtown Tigard ,� - using a new light rail bridge crossing over OR-217.The `•1 - •—. :. structure travels through the Knez wetland area,requiring ."+�: •� o-i) the project to complete wetland mitigation. Final design of , Elmhurst l light rail structure over Hwy OR-217 and Knez Wetland to waimart i be context sensitive and guided by architectural toolkit in Chapter 4. . I While currently not part of the project scope,Station ro A 11"11111 lir Figure 7.7.2 .1 , i Access Project#30:OR-217 Multi use Pathway is a key active transportation component.This project links . Downtown Tigard to the Tigard Triangle,bringing Red Rock \\�� N CIli reek Trail a step closer to becoming an arm of the Fanno 4.e'6 , Hall Lowe's p Creek Trail System. Both TriMet and the City of Tigard agree the multi-use pathway is a project betterment and r 1 will partner to be co-applicants for funding. See Figures - 7.6.6 and 7.8.8 for extent and location of Multi-use Pathway. iii*. 4F o It 14 P oA • 20 .� aoo� soo� Figure 7.7.1 OR-217 Crossing overview - 1 ."=`1 IIIllllllIIllllllIIlllD'l-=IIIllllllIIllllllIIlllllIIIIIii0Vv''-I'- 9, r, ,t V All a OR 217 1j - VI"401 ,40,,,,,n. .IS IL (0w" �1� 1 1 0 0' 8' 16' 32' Figure 7.7.2 DRAFT OR-217 Crossing Section 170 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 7.8 Hall Boulevard Station CI) 5,500 Projected DailyTrips a . ` 0 46 Percent Walk 01'0 ••f:•. • f ' Q 42 Percent Transfer 12 Percent Auto Bike Use: • High Sitting at the intersection of a dense mixed-use center and , k, regional employment hub,Hall Boulevard Station is a critical :4 �J., node for the project.To emphasize bus and WES Commuter Rail transfers,the SW Commercial St transit corridor will be I designed for pedestrian comfort and integrate the station into Downtown Tigard. Design elements include bus shelters, - .. • ,-� �_ landscaping,pavement treatments and wayfinding. Similar i �C__4.22 - - . pedestrian and bicycle improvements along SW Hall Blvd and li0._ ;t t,•41;11. , 1; . +,:t ; ---r L - f SW Hunziker St will help continue to make Tigard one of the most walkable cities in the re ion. _ *="' PROJECT BENEFITS _Lati vim r.; Q MOVE AND CONNECT PEOPLE �4 - L. - - -- - , f • Safer and easier pedestrian connections across SW Hall ~- Blvd and along SW Commercial St • Access to Tigard Transit Center and WES Commuter Rail -- • Planned connections to WES Commuter Rail,Yamhill SW Hall Blvd crossing and SW The light rail and OMF are The station provides access to County Transit,and TriMet bus lines 1,37,76,78,89,93, 4 Commercial St improvements i CQ ID Downtown Tigard as well as the ', ? designed to minimize impact to 94,97 will facilitate multimodal transit Hunziker industrial core , the surrounding wetlands and connections floodplains • Three-track configuration provides light rail access to the Figure 7.8.1 DRAFT Hall Boulevard Station Vision operations and maintenance facility(OMF) MAINTAIN AND CREATE EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES DESIGN VALUES:APPLYING COMMUNITY FEEDBACK IN ONGOING DESIGN • Access to Historic Downtown Tigard and Tigard City Hall • Create station and infrastructure design that supports the vision of a dense,walkable community hub in downtown • Access to Red Rock Creek and Fanno Creek Trail • Advance designs of bicycle and pedestrian facilities on SW Hall Blvd to support existing and future multimodal travel behaviors,connect existing and planned improvement projects and access affordable housing 0 PRESERVE AND RESTORE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT • Consider Hall Boulevard Station and the operations and maintenance facility visibility from SW Commercial St to • Enhanced street tree canopy and stormwater treatment support station area aesthetics and wayfinding along Hall Blvd • Integrate stormwater facilities to enhance station area and Red Rock Creek natural area • Preservation of views to Knez wetland • Type,size and location of Park&Ride will be finalized to support access to transit,address vehicular circulation and • Light rail alignment and operations and maintenance support potential development opportunities facility cited to avoid impacts to Red Rock Creek and existing flood plain • Design to facilitate transit-oriented development consistent with Tigard's strategic vision to maximize walking and transit ridership,attract private sector investment,advance project affordable housing goals and support Metro's 2040 Town Center land use vision 171 PROJECT SCOPE �� tiono wom............. :, ,. s� c tit/ dinez • Hall Boulevard Station and light rail infrastructure soo- Streetitealljgn17 I Wetland •• • Existing oss — N Bridge over • SW Hall Blvd streetscape improvements for people Transit.Center 0 1 walking, biking and accessing transit between the Tigard TC• s-6, ,Figure 7.8.6 r. – – I oR 217 o Hammerhead at Knoll Dr existing rail crossing and SW Hunziker St WES >, ,, k • .�• Ly �P . ", r • SW Commercial St bike and pedestrian streetscape Station �s i 3 ��Crossing Gates improvements(between SW Hall and SW Ash Ave) �F , , r�� • Intersection realignment/improvements at SW c°�,�G /t., i ' ` i g•. OMF/Park&Ride access road 17Hunziker St/SW Scoffins St/SW Hall Blvd 0� r Hall • Short-term and long-term bike parking (see tablesD4101°. • ��_ Humphrie .1 Or y below for recommendations on number of spaces Labs �• Iv 4. k,r� *17 ' Gn�kP for opening day) 4, .0 y' ,i.te1.. 1 st • Revised bus stop routing and stop locations : ' • • Surface Park&Ride with up to 100 parking spaces - 94 ' ? °'A> ' • Operations and Maintenance Facility '` °'2 ` – – • ;'J 9 Viewpoint of station vision rendering s/ .-1Ctillii\ ,,, ; A New or Enhanced Project Elements Existing Assets Tigard. ` Public Works Roadway Multifamily Sidewalk Employment = ' ig Q New/Enhanced Signal Retail <-\\ \ .., Gated Crossing Existing Trail ,,. --' oil NM Crosswalk Signal at 4 ,� . _ Enhanced Ped. major road Tigard d Crossing Crosswalk(s)IIIII Tigard Skatepark 0' 100' 200' 400' Project Feature at major road z ( pII ;,: � ., Figure 7.8.2 DRAFT Hall Boulevard Station overview ' ROW — -- ROW i - --� -4 \Ur AOr 7 g ' . •.. e eee e 1:11,„I _ 1/ 8 8 1 ,/' Iv o v o4) — I t tt v� 'ICS pf11' 71f[ !i 1 \�. e ,_-_\ -_-_\ 1 t c Sidewalk Bike Lane Travel Lane Median/ Travel Lane Bike Lane Sidewalk Light Rail Platform Trackway Light Rail Platform Third Trackway Turn Lane (access to OMF) Figure 7.8.3 DRAFT Hall Boulevard Station Cross Section 0' 4' 8' 16' 172 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT e e � _ .. „,.. _ i, o � 1pi ii i ill 4 t Sidewalk Parking Travel Lane Travel Lane Sidewalk 0' 4' 8' 16' Figure 7.8.4 DRAFT Commercial Street Cross Section,NW-Bound Bus Stop lite, . i- 1 li I 1 a 0 c, i�� 1 ■ I �4 - 4 - - 1 Magno-Humphries Sidewalk Travel Lane Travel Lane Parking Sidewalk Parking 0' 4' 8' 16' Figure 7.8.5 DRAFT Commercial Street Cross Section,SE-Bound Bus Stop 173 STATION FEATURESi iiii , _ , , ,/ , , 10 Side platforms s0 Bus stop improvements 4 ♦ ,/ �I / 02 SW Hall Blvd improvements © Accessible ramp +i��a / / , SW Hall Blvd pedestrian 0 Hunziker/Scoffins Realignment SW Scoffins St • 0 I 0 , friz / / 0 crossing improvements 0 Gated crossing *. . /�„ �� ti°172%. . �l / ® SW Commercial St sidewalk g0 Third Trackway + .� f4 *� improvements * *I ` / ►, I I .�� _� �Platform ——— Project Boundary � I I I Landscape Track * Potential Stormwater Crossing Gate iiTreatment Existing Right-of-Way �'�— ► /, / �o`a SidewalNew/Improved New/Improved / o�yy Roadway 1 o New/Enhanced / Signal Shared Transitway /_ ' Pedestrian Ballasted Track �N- 1 Crossing 0 Potential Bike Parking - �ei°a r / 1r ® Potential Bus Stop ' ��i �' 1 5 ' \, IMF / 1 i ” / (,( ,:-- , / 0' 25' 50' 100' Ak.„.1 . , , / o / * / ' N ' / ,,,/ 7 \\ Pi �‘ 14* A ' Surface Park&Ride4 ,Transfer to WES \ / - ' with,up to 100 spaces 0 Commuter Rail \ Third trackwayrovides light �4 s �, \ 0 rail vehicles with� ccess to the operations apd �� / ' \©� �/\431. �o� � maintenance facility �/ <2 III NN/#1, 0 \N 0 ‘N._ *I i 4 agno- 11 /°'P Humphries 4 �4 � Operations and MaintenanceLabs lit , �� Facility(see Figure 7.8.7) .� C * T, Figure 7.8.6 DRAFT Hall Boulevard Station Plan;Design is conceptual and will be further developed through community engagement and technical design efforts 174 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT r>- i* _ ,� OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY(OMF) Surf at 4 arK&Ride L The operations and maintenance facility will improve with up vp spaces> o,aa `es reliability and on time performance of light rail operations. ? The site design accommodates a future expansion, preserves industrial-zoned land,and avoids impacts to the j °11111.IIIIIII\ adjacent floodplain of Red Rock Creek.The 15 acre layout, ©� implemented in two phases, includes 10 maintenance © bays and will support up to 150 jobs. Potential project mitigations or future in-stream stormwater management may include habitat restoration opportunities to Fanno * •t�0'• iCreek flood plain. / it OMF FEATURES ✓/ 1 Hall Boulevard Station :\/ %\ �, 0 Accessible ramp /; 0 0 Pedestrian access to station / ©i • � 000 Gated access / � 0 OMF parking / ® OMF yard i 0 Future Maintenance-of-Way(MOW)building � 1S/ „i9ess ® Systems building Q Repair Shop Apron • 0OMF building t CO , 11 Existing rail right-of-way/WES Commuter Rail ' N. 411\,....., 0 Wetland ; `I ® 13 Southwest Corridor Light Rail Track Alignment Fu , , , GfP'9 , Platform ——— Project Boundary .0' Landscape Track �,�' — Potential Stormwater Crossing Gate Treatment _ Existing Right-of-Way ® 0 /'%/ Sitlewlalkroved - New/Improved / Roadway 11 // n SiNew/Enhanced Shared Transitway ✓ nal ss‘'N // Pedestrian Ballasted Track / Crossing • Potential Bike Parking / / ® Potential Bus Stop / / . 0' 25' 50' 100' A i' Figure 7.8.7 DRAFT Operations and Maintenance Facility(OMF)Plan;Design is conceptual and will be further developed through community engagement and technical design efforts 175 •STATION ACCESS PROJECTS 's; — ..1 I .. IF ' ./e* -vev-Ai- -e- Hall Sidewalks \ ,; i ▪ i — OR 217 Multi use Pathway C\�Ilk. �`o .. Itl.s„, • Illy .. . mij r\\ 4.0, „..4 r._ _ le PARTNER-LED PROJECTS ' #4,,01C2v. .,.--• lk \ ' ell I ill 'il * •-.- Al frit Ai —0— New trail along Red Rock Creek s r 4 I o 81 /11 Ti and O, TC-W . . P�, _ r.• ■ Station >d>J, •' - /�4 �__ 1 if .e, •;;›, 1 t \ -------li-- s ¶ / / ./#4e. .• y6��► ry y°�_ 1 Hall ��P�s� ' t t 41tio, I I I f / .41 . .k . /. /0 - t ar, L 6'G _ .r des 0' 100' 200' 400' f f N''. ' Ayr• Figure 7.8.8 Hall Boulevard Station Access Projects and Potential Partnering C) 1/2 Mile Station Walkshed 100/200/400'from Station FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES Based on station area context, project partners will explore the following: There is estimated demand within the station area for the following private mobility services: New Transit-Oriented Places Adapting Park&Rides Mobility solutions can be integrated into Mobility solutions may be introduced into ® Electric Bike/Scooter Share 0 On-Demand Ridehailing imm ,m11 buildings at the ground floor,in a parking dedicated Park&Rides,such as pick-up/ garage or associated landscaped area. , drop-off zones or space for other mobility 0 Bike share(Dockless) 0 Carshare services. TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Public Realm Adapting the Right-of-Way Mobility solutions may be integrated in Future mobility solutions may be located Planning for development opportunities will continue to be explored in collaboration with the City of Tigard. an area set aside for stormwater needs, along the curb or along the sidewalk within A ffi . systems buildings or hardscaped plaza. . , a public or private street-outside of the project boundary. See Chapter 4.12 for a complete list of mobility partnering opportunities. 176 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 7.9 Bonita Road Station (IIIII) 2,300 Projected Daily Trips 0 73 Percent Walk te • Q 27 Percent Transfer 0 0 Percent Auto Bikewse: Low o .t Located at the intersection of SW Bonita Rd and SW 74thi . �i i Ave, Bonita Road Station serves both the diverse residential _ +_ `. r •:-.1.'- Th f;.r� E communities to the west and the industrial employment — �. ii_� : center to the east. Perhaps more importantly,the station is - -E. just a few steps from an entry point to the Fanno Creek Trail, .. .....7-..,--:1,,,,,n, -" . makingit aperfect link for those walkingand bikingalong --ft 1 f ',� this vital regional connector. _— • - ''` ' ;: -,, ;, 1 I PROJECT BENEFITS -- \N �n; 11 111 MOVE AND CONNECT PEOPLEver _.' ? r"`=�,+! ° • Bike and walk connections to the existing Fanno Creek i .�.. '. . ---- Trail System and planned extension • Elevated over SW Bonita Rd,the visible station location , avoids disruption of nearby businesses,existing railroad i tracks and roadway traffic • Planned connections to bus line 37,97 0 MAINTAIN AND CREATE EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES ,gyp Bike and walk connections to the Serves diverse residential — Enhanced street tree canopy and • Access to the Bonita neighborhood and SW Durham Rd "b existing Fanno Creek Trail system communities to the west and •� stormwater treatment at Bonita and planned extension industrial employment to the east station area industrial and employment center • Access to Bonita Park and natural areas along Fanno Figure 7.9.1 DRAFT Bonita Road Station vision and Ball Creeks • Located adjacent to the planned extension of Fanno DESIGN VALUES:APPLYING COMMUNITY FEEDBACK IN ONGOING DESIGN Creek Regional trail system • Design of alignment and station location to the north of SW Bonita Rd to be context sensitive and guided by • Serves diverse residential communities to the west and architectural toolkit in Chapter 4 industrial employment to the east • Pedestrian facilities should connect to existing and planned improvements,such as Fanno Creek Trail,and provide 0 PRESERVE AND RESTORE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT access to existing affordable housing to support Tigard's vision to be a walkable community • Enhanced street tree canopy at station area 177 • PROJECT SCOPE • Bonita Road Station and light rail infrastructure r _1 • Off-street pick-up/drop-off loop •-4- • Short-term and long-term bike parkingr - Medical Teams Elevated _ N • Revised bus stop routing and stop locations ' sN. trackway • ,_ ,-.1 T.- a Fought Steel r 1 7. .C}� IL Bonita�O)c • Plant J ��' Park ` LLL 5 � i r , LFLJ _ J J a n 0 ] Q o iPick-up/ L 7°cc i :c,', Drop-off i cc, 0,,F Bonita _ �0 — '` Communit Bonita �� { ., �• Church :, , I Figu t19.` \ Lir I �� SW Bonita Rd Pi%Cc 0 [ 7 ; . _ 'I, — E V Viewpoint of station vision rendering11 a as ' ' Elevated tation- 1 C-1 New or Enhanced Project Elements Existing Assets 0 -7-S. 1 . �� 7) Roadway Multifamily , I: ek j Sidewalk Employment 11� `Figure 7.9.4 #ir ga\\Cce LI ''orst , f— 1 �J 0 New/Enhanced Signal Retail ❑ -. - . Gated Crossing Existing Trail �� lit Q `f, NM Crosswalk O Signal at p 9 En Ped. major road o In a, ' I p :-] Enhanced ed • 0, 100' 200• 400• A =ature Crosswalk(s) li Q u) ..11111 at major roado C Pi . . i „�_ Figure 7.9.2 DRAFT Bonita Road Station overview I I I I °° Alq_4-- I•.- -I 7 , 0._,I, 1114 _,„4,_,__,_,_,,, ,—, .,. 1sy :v", ,1 z.1.1.1, 1 0- .411111i- Sidewalk Drop-Off Station Plaza Elevated Station Existing Rail Figure 7.9.3 DRAFT Bonita Road Station Cross Section 0' 15' 30' 178 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT .\\\ I - \ L1i. H STATION FEATURES 61 1 1 j 10 Elevated station with side platforms Bonita 1 \ 1 20 Stair and elevator access to station Park \ 1 ` 1 ® Pick-up/drop-off �� I �� 1V 0 Potential systems building location(below 1\ 1 \ structure) \ I 'A \ 05 Potential systems building location ., � \ ® Nearby access to existing Fanno Creek Trail x \ -z) \ \ O \41 d (Di 0 f A � N \ Ili 7 I Z I M T I 170 I c c-, Bonit. % i io‘ Figut� mmu itco CID 11111101111 �1 �� Churcilk „ 11 SW Bonita Rd 1 11 r / 111 1\ V \ \ I \ 1 H FE- ,, \ 1\ Platform ——— Project Boundary \ \ Landscape Track \ \ '5Potential Stormwater Crossing Gate Treatment — Existing Right-of-Way ,I, \\ \\\ New/Improved New/Improved Q \ \ - Sidewalk Roadway � \ \ 1 New/Enhanced \ I o Signal Shared Transitway \ \\ 1 Pedestrian Ballasted Track Portland Compressor \ \ \ II . Crossing • Potential Bike Parking \ '' \ 1 ® Potential Bus Stop \ 1 r—off\ \ I _ A ,, �• 25' S0' 100' Figure 7.9.4 DRAFT Bonita Road Station Plan;Design is conceptual and will be further developed through community engagement and technical design efforts 179 STATION ACCESS PROJECTS . -®— 72nd Sidewalks&Bikeway Bonita Park \\ -fb— Bonita Sidewalks&Bikeway _; PARTNER-LED PROJECTS a) limp - —Oi — 72nd Ave Corridor Study(City of Tigard TSP 2035) �P" fl DI' S. -0— Extension of Fanno Creek Trail UM. 1 1 4 �, ro SW Bonita Rd.. O ti i �,: , i ita i s • \ ►2 � I ;� ,_ 111 II"1 -fw II A �� 1111! OD l111 "mai � nl 0' 100' 200' 400' lioA ■ i i ___ Figure 7.9.5 Bonita Road Station Access Projects and Potential Partnering 1/2 Mile Station Walkshed 100/200/400'from Station FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES Based on station area context, project partners will explore the following: There is estimated demand within the station area for the following private mobility services: ilkAdapting the Right-of-Way Public Realm Future mobility solutions may be located Mobility solutions may be integrated in 0 On-Demand Ridehailing along the curb or along the sidewalk within an area set aside for stormwater needs, - - a public or private street-outside of the ' i' . systems buildings or hardscaped plaza. project boundary. TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT To be determined See Chapter 4.12 for a complete list of mobility partnering opportunities. 180 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 7.10 Upper Boones Ferry Road Station 1,300 Projected Daily Trips0 • ;; r � ®100 Percent Walk • �� Q 0 Percent Transfer ; .. i r :o T.: nr. x m O0 Percent Auto Bike Use: LOW row Upper Boones Ferry Road Station is located in the heart of ..-...L.....- , ,� - i.„„ Tigard's bustling office park employment center. Commuters -- -_ will be able to easily walk to dozens of offices, industrial _—buildings and business parks that surround the station.SW ... ~�"` "°' �' Upper Boones Ferry Rd also serves as the primary connection 7 - - _ '>r -• ' -- ►- • ' • from the station to residential and retail areas to the east of -.' ' ' _ __ ` - "-` 15 and beyond. _ PROJECT BENEFITS \ i. • j. _ i _ � � �- Q MOVE AND CONNECT PEOPLE -_ NM,240 - • Safer pedestrian crossings at SW 72nd Ave and the ;4.k-, I railroad tracks at SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd ••=,--, _ • Planned connections to bus line 97 - C.,• =• �`~ Vii;-, 0 MAINTAIN AND CREATE EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES ` 66E14:,., , ~ y • Access to the Durham Road industrial and office :, employment center 0 PRESERVE AND RESTORE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Safer pedestrian crossings at SWOas Access to the Durham Road ,t;��Q .3 t. Stormwater treatment at station 72nd Ave and the railroad tracks at industrial and office employment C, • Stormwater treatment at station area SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd center area Figure 7.10.1 DRAFT Upper Boones Ferry Road Station Vision DESIGN VALUES:APPLYING COMMUNITY FEEDBACK IN ONGOING DESIGN • Stormwater facilities should be integrated to enhance station area • Final design of street and intersection to provide safe crossing of SW 72nd Ave and SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd to facilitate comfortable access to the station • Station design to minimize impacts to traffic flow and allow for potential future roadway expansion (partner project). During project development,additional traffic modeling and consideration of all transportation modes at Upper Boones Ferry Road Station will guide project and partner improvements towards the best long-term regional solution 181 PROJECT SCOPE , . • Upper Boones Ferry Road Station and light rail v L JJ a C i U ca infrastructure .. '•: T- 0 • Off-street pick-up/drop-off loop y �� ' • SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd streetscape f /-7 a �J0) ,) improvements between the existing rail crossing and I '‘ �'I 1-5 for people walking, biking and accessing transit _ Roadway reconstruction Roadway reconstruction • Short-term and long-term bike parking •• . — along SW Sequoia Pkwy along SW Upper Boones I Ferry Rd • Revised bus stop routing and stop locations 1 'i Gated crossing and • SW Sequoia Pkwyand SW Upper Boones FerryRd II aI �� 'Pick-up/Drop-off I crossing improvements intersection improvements (trains,cars,pedestrians, v I ril. "I co cyclists) Q I I �.•)•\\ \\� ... p i i _ -I 2S S a . .. �Q I- I 1 .. A I ��` S� V Viewpoint of station vision rendering 1 I —�1 _ I. / /' / New or Enhanced Project Elements Existing Assets Q I �Jpper Roadway Multifamily r 3 I Hotel Boaines Ferry 10 Sidewalk EmploymentL I J`e-I. 0 New/Enhanced Signal Retail ''''') FSA 54gure7.10_4., Gated Crossing Existing Trail ; 017, 4. - NM Crosswalk o Signal at _ Enhanced Ped. major road 17-171- �` ` . a ail ' A, Crossing Crosswalk(s)11111111 '•-, // 0' ,00 zoo 400 Project Feature at major road { / `k E. __ a �' a Figure 7.10.2 DRAFT Upper Boones Ferry Road Station overview oap 4. ,� . .1%;f - / I/00 I \4_, ...,: ,,, 4, [ ( ] 000 �. �� I- �� 'u� �r�� - 4,, 411._x. v o o ______, ,_ jai � � .... .4, , i v o o vIII Existing PNWR Railroad Light Rail Platform Trackway Light Rail Platform Existing Parking (north of SW Upper Boones Figure 7.10.3 DRAFT Upper Boones Ferry Road Station Cross Section Ferry Road) 0' 4' 8' 16' 182 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT t) 1 STATION FEATURES © 0 Split Side Platform(northbound) /i 0 Split Side Platform(southbound) /1/ ® Pick-up/drop-off `,/ /7/ ® Gated Crossing(serves light rail and freight rail) \ * 0 / Regrading of Private Parking i / ' I © Private Parking Reconfiguration 0 'i 1 Y 0 Potential systems building location G- 1 ' �, r v `. .c, 6. v * 1 •-/ A,.4,/ a 0 �� eoo , v , ,,•\16,1 ,,(7. \-) `� !p:tormwaterlEn:oGu::T undary• ilk \ ate Z Treatment Existing Right-of-Way .� New/Improved New/Improved roved 0 ; Sidewalk Roadwap �� • �. New/Enhanced ` Si• gnal Shared Transitway YPedestrian Ballasted Track x'03 Crossing 0 Potential Bike Parking FSA°° ` ® Potential Bus Stop , '''\ ii__- '''—') 'I • ''' . t 0' 25-50' 100' A Figure 7.10.4 DRAFT Upper Boones Ferry Road Station Plan;Design is conceptual and will be further developed through community engagement and technical design efforts 183 STATION ACCESS PROJECTS c or ▪®- 72nd Sidewalks&Bikeway -t— Carman Sidewalks&Bikeway 'if m lM a Q 1 1 et 0 PARTNER-LED PROJECTS N L ——4Qp, a�ao —0— 72nd Ave Corridor Study(City of Tigard TSP I ` 2035) i 1 - QQ, ,, / p Upper Boo r —Q— Extension of Fanno Creek Trail* Q• rr I s 1 F y 1 Upper Boones Ferry Rd road widening(City of 1 -0— Tigard TSP 2035) t Q *These projects are located within the 1/2 mile walkshed of the station,but are not - � %captured within the maps extents CO O - _-- , •f F : - i - - i t. 0' 100' 200' 400' � sr its ", i Figure 7.10.5 Upper Boones Ferry Road Station Access Projects and Potential Partnering C) 1/2 Mile Station Walkshed 100/200/400'from Station FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES Based on station area context, project partners will explore the following: There is estimated demand within the station area for the following private mobility services: Adapting Existing Places Adapting the Right-of-Way Property owners may work with the city Future mobility solutions may be located 0 Circulator Shuttles . _ and mobility providers on solutions such along the curb or along the sidewalk within Oma as in a parking lot or landscaped area. ' ,- 7 . , - a public or private street-outside of the project boundary. TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Public Realm To be determined Mobility solutions may be integrated in an area set aside for stormwater needs, �. " . systems buildings or hardscaped plaza. See Chapter 4.12 for a complete list of mobility partnering opportunities. 184 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 7.11 Bridgeport Transit Center Ili 7,800 Projected Daily Trips 23 Percent Walk �j`�• . . O50 Percent Transfer r. Bike Use: r' V O 27 Percent Auto Medium = 9" s The Bridgeport Transit Center will be more than just a light . (. 'I rail station. It will be an iconic mobility node and visible y - . gateway to those traveling across the region. With a major =. ,, _ : , _ Park&Ride,bus transfer center,access to 1-5 and walkable ¢ i,,.—; •I f::, fi _4:�'. • .f��.1,+. ,- .1 -' ip 11 ` - I-- ,� .. connections to Bridgeport Village,the station will serve,; - a wide range of communities in the southern metro area. �.� ' . � ,. �: •` •„ w _• - F'r Adjacent to the Bridgeport Village commercial center are MAX - - - • . _ q , , f=_ r-----? `- numerous potential development sites.The area is set to = - -� become a new central hub of activity. "- - ,�=y= -"`-`-M �_ � 4 —''' `�w -• PROJECT BENEFITS + + -0. ,gym} ' x;r, _ MOVE AND CONNECT PEOPLE J ��:;. 't '1'.-...._ 1 • Park&Ride provides parking for people riding light rail -- and bus _ 411%1 Art • Safer pedestrian access across SW 72nd Ave and Lower �2 :,., :-r=- . Boones Ferry Rd : _>*-;.--__ .-_- . -- _ . ; ,_ . . . .- ... . - . -.S4- • Planned connections to TriMet bus lines 36,76,96,97, Planned connections to TriMet bus Access to City of Durham,Bryant • SMART bus line,and ODOTpoint bus OQ Enhanced tree canopy and lines 36,76,96,97,SMART bus line neighborhood,and Bridgeport stormwater treatment at station 0 MAINTAIN AND CREATE EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES and ODOT point bus Village shopping center • Access to City of Durham, Bryant neighborhood and Figure 7.11.1 DRAFT Bridgeport Transit Center Vision Bridgeport Village shopping center DESIGN VALUES:APPLYING COMMUNITY FEEDBACK IN ONGOING DESIGN • Access to Durham City Park, Heron Grove City Park and Tualatin Greenway • Designs to address traffic congestion and improve connectivity to I-5 and mobility in Tualatin 0 PRESERVE AND RESTORE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT • Designs should support connections to downtown Tualatin and other communities in the south,and not preclude a potential future light rail extension • Enhanced tree canopy and stormwater treatment at station • Facilities to support multimodal travel behaviors should be integrated into station area streetscape designs to prioritize walking,biking,bus transfers,car share and micromobility options such as pick-up/drop-off and scooters • Designs to support safe access to transit for people walking and biking across busy streets • Type,size and location of Park&Ride will be finalized to support access to transit,address vehicular circulation and support potential development opportunities. Design of Transit Center/Park&Ride should celebrate light rail and the surrounding Tualatin community through placemaking opportunities • Designs shall facilitate development to shift land use toward walking and biking within transit-oriented development, to attract private sector investment,advance project affordable housing goals and support Tualatin's land use vision 185 PROJECT SCOPE r L L— f Ind st • Bridgeport Transit Center and light rail infrastructure I Fa ili ies d • Off-street pick-up/drop-off loop 0 v O + L� , C Lusial 3 ' + r • Bridgeport Transit Center/Park&Ride(up to 960 F ciii es I f ' spaces) LI 1L4 • Pedestrian bridge between light rail platforms and t – – – – – I, ,, J .� Transit Center/Park&Ride Figure 7.1 .41 J — • Short-term and long-term bike parking _ • Intersections r � + improvements to bel I / Y determined at SW'\ Pick-up/Drop-off / • Revised bus stop routing and stop locations 72nd Ave crossing, , • Intersection improvements at SW 72nd Ave and , + Id 0 Bridgeport Transit Center/Park&Ride access drive - • I ` ' m._. ,_` >, / Bridge or/Transit L NCenter.--, 9 0. -_ 1_, or '�'-1111 i 1111111 I dill. _ --. i �� bower Boones Ferry Rd 0 ___-- Viewpoint of station vision rendering am-' � J-1- .- L�'°A j II , New or Enhanced Project Elements Existing Assets I I �' �i 0 I! - – destrian bridge over SW - –A\– - - - i Lower Boones Ferry Rd } \ ; Transit Center/ i Roadway Multifamily ` , Structured • - Sidewalk Employment Park&Ride 0 New/Enhanced Signal Retail . / ffr /41. 411111b ://141110- � . ,��• k ' with up to 960 Gated Crossing Existing Trail ' o<, d–• spaces NM Crosswalk �e� � � Signal at 0 a , �s 0 major road s� � m >: +` Enhanced Ped. , v v: ,� + : , o' 100 zoo noo' Crossing Crosswalk(s) o "i ;'Figurv7.1.415Ijr A Project Feature at major road _ – – – 4_ is_ _ _ , • . . Figure 7.11.2 DRAFT Bridgeport Transit Center Station overview -••c. a e - M� 4 C ___, XArlilli W r111 '1A1(1 KO [J till DKi �jj1'I I' IllrdP 444p, IlEn iiiii Drop Off Light Rail Platform Trackway Light Rail Platform Trackway Pedestrian Bridge to Park&Ride Figure 7.11.3 DRAFT Bridgeport Transit Center Cross Section 0' 5' 10' 20' 186 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT j I STATION FEATURES .1 ,' 70 Split platforms ----'\ e • i .Men's Warehouse f; 0 Pick-up/drop-off /; O Transit Center/Structured Park&Ride with up to 960 spaces Pedestrian bridge connecting station to Transit Center/ Intersection / ® Park&Ride improvements to / 5 Potential systems buildinglocation be determined Y McCormick& / © Tail track for additional train at end of line Schmick's / a 0 Stair and elevator access to pedestrian bridge ^/-' �.'r i; ►. -. R. - 0 Accessible ramp entries ., _- 90 Stairs to upper levels of structure /4r a N O \ *# .® > # 4 if,,,,, 3 Village Inn - __ I r r \ ,-- 1 1 JIM r 1 � w �__f Pi Platform --- Project Boundary i 1 • Landscape = Track r , Potential Stormwater Crossing Gate 1 Treatment Existing Right-of-Way New/Improved New/Improved AL,60 � f _ � - ® �0Sidewalk Roadway 0 �`\ " - C - Q 0 New/Enhanced Shared Transitway E Signal 'as'''- Ballasted Track ----=a+- II Pedestrian .641 �' t ,O 0 If • m Crossing Potential Bike Parking ro Ss' rn 0 ® Potential Bus Stop o�// cb o' 2S oo' loo' A -.., :Figure 7.11.4 DRAFT Bridgeport Transit Center Plan;Design is conceptual and will be further developed through community engagement and technical design efforts 187 'Ci • r e s e��0 -- i �.,oir TRANSIT CENTER FEATURES , 0 Transit Center at ground level(8 bus bays) ® vAe`,R,°° �4, f • ° U 02 Vehicular entrance for Structured Park&Ride with up to 960 spaces 44 t ° 0 Stairs to upper levels of structure r ° * e #' 0 Stairs and elevator to upper levels of structure and F pedestrian bridge ' O : ° I 05 Traffic mitigation at intersection to be determined lit • © No existing or new pedestrian crossing on NE side of \ °"4, ¢ intersection \ ; eV 0 Vehicular access to Park&Ride and bus facilities,with \ signalized intersection \ \ T as \ ' a wo , !,.t. Z2 i ..,#,,. '\ \‘, ga \-- y' O r \\111 .di \ 1 I Platform ——— Project Boundary I I / Landscape = Track I. o Potential Stormwater Crossing Gate m i I * Treatment __— Existing Right-of-Way o 1 New/Improved r Sidewalk New/Improved 41111111 , I Roadway 1 0 New/Enhanced Shared Transitway Signal :; � Pedestrian Ballasted Track Crossing • Potential Bike Parking 1/ ® Potential Bus Stop I / N ._ 0 0' 20'_s100' A Figure 7.11.5 DRAFT Bridgeport Transit Center Plan and Park&Ride 188 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT STATION ACCESS PROJECTS " CIii # / -®- 72nd Sidewalks and Bikeway , -S— Lower Boones Ferry and Boones Ferry Bikeway AM % + �___allil jt' N 1 —cf-- , � C PARTNER-LED PROJECTS �r F[I 4 OP:- viv • 5 —O— 72nd Ave Corridor Study(City of Tigard TSP 9 ——- ,„„„ 2035) CO / • r III■ t y � � F * i r t AN t '. 't 'N ,.'BrKIgepo t _ . `�-0 Transit Center — , p . , 0 Q 0.. ,.-1110. 011001/. ec) i• se .10A t � 0' 100• 200' 400' A .#0= tr ilk' zip ...,,,..._ Figure 7.11.6 Bridgeport Transit Center Station Access Projects and Potential Partnering ,-- i 1/2 Mile Station Walkshed 100/200/400'from Station FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES Based on station area context, project partners will explore the following: There is estimated demand within the station area for the following private mobility services: Public Realm Adapting Park&Rides Mobility solutions may be integrated Mobility solutions may be introduced into an area set aside for stormwater needs, dedicated Park&Rides,such as pick-up/ 0 Circulator Shuttle 0 On-Demand Ridehailing AIN , systems buildings or hardscaped plaza. , drop-off zones or space for other mobility 121 Carshare services. TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Planning for development opportunities will continue to be explored in collaboration with the City of Tualatin. See Chapter 4.12 for a complete list of mobility partnering opportunities. 189 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. 190 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Acknowledgments Special thanks Community Advisory Committee (Past*and Present Members) To the many community members who provided meaningful input on the Amanda Guile Tualatin resident;City of Wilsonville employee Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project Angela Hendren* Tualatin renter;transit commuter to Portland State University Bill Garyfallou Barbur Boulevard business owner Bob Ludlum Washington County resident;Veterans&Senior Council advisor Steering Committee(2019-Present) Calista Fitzgerald Designer;former Tigard Planning Commission Chair Doug Kelsey,Chair TriMet Chad Hastings CenterCal Properties/Bridgeport Village Commissioner Chloe Eudaly City of Portland Chris Carpenter FocusPoint Communications;Oregon labor representative Councilor Craig Dirksen Metro Debra Dunn Synergy Resources Group(business consultant) Mayor Gery Schirado City of Durham Elise Shearer Tigard Town Center Advisory Committee;St Anthony Parish Mayor Jason Snider City of Tigard Eric Sporre PacTrust Rian Windsheimer Oregon Department of Transportation Ethan Frelly Tigard Chamber of Commerce; Beltran Properties Councilor Robert Kellogg City of Tualatin Ian Stude Portland State University Commissioner Roy Rogers Washington County Julia Michel* Portland State University Lindsey Wise Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee;transit commuter to Additional acknowledgments to the Metro-led Steering Committee members Portland State University during the projects planning phase(2011-2018)and the 11 cities and agencies Melissa Moncada Engineer;West Portland Park Neighborhood who contributed to defining the Locally Preferred Alternative: Metro,TriMet, Michael Harrison Oregon Health &Science University(OHSU) Oregon Department of Transportation,Washington County,City of Portland, City of Rachael Duke Community Partners for Affordable Housing Tigard, City of Tualatin, City of Durham, King City, City of Sherwood and the City of Ramtin Rahmani Tigard resident;bicycle commuter to OHSU Beaverton. Rebecca Ocken Portland Community College Sylvania Campus Project Management Group Project Team Leadership Leah Robbins TriMet Steve Witter TriMet Dave Unsworth TriMet Bernie Bottomly TriMet Kelly Betteridge TriMet Malu Wilkinson Metro Scott Robertson TriMet Mandy Putney Oregon Department of Transportation Joanna Campbell TriMet Art Pearce City of Portland Jennifer Koozer TriMet Chris Warner City of Portland Chris Ford Metro Kenny Asher City of Tigard Michaela Skiles Metro Aquilla Hurd-Ravich City of Tualatin Rory Renfro Oregon Department of Transportation Christina Deffebach Washington County Teresa Boyle City of Portland John Gillam City of Portland Patrick Sweeney City of Portland Lori Faha City of Tigard Schuyler Warren City of Tigard Garet Prior City of Tualatin Christina Deffebach Washington County 191 Conceptual Design Report Work Group Marquam Hill Green Ribbon Committee Members Josh Mahar TriMet Fred Miller,Chair Libby Winter TriMet Councilor Bob Stacey Metro Amparo Agosto TriMet Doug Kelsey General Manager,TriMet Aster Moulton TriMet Jamey Duhamel Office of Commissioner Eudaly,City of Portland Jeb Doran TriMet Todd Lofgren Office of Commissioner Fish,City of Portland Fiona Cundy TriMet Zari Santner Portland Design Commission Michaela Skiles Metro Skai Dancey Oregon Health &Science University Rory Renfro Oregon Department of Transportation Chet Orloff Historian Teresa Boyle City of Portland Don Stastny Architect Patrick Sweeney City of Portland Anton Vetterlein Friends of Terwilliger John Gillam City of Portland Mimi Phillips City of Portland Gary Pagenstecher City of Tigard Marquam Hill Working Group Members Garet Prior City of Tualatin Brett Horner Portland Parks&Recreation Steve Kelley Washington County Hillary Adam Portland Bureau of Development Services Kokila Lochan Urban Design Integration Group Teresa Boyle Portland Bureau of Transportation Kate Howe Urban Design Integration Group Chris Ford Metro Tom Bennett Urban Design Integration Group Michael Harrison Oregon Health &Science University Justin Panganiban Urban Design Integration Group John Dodier Department of Veterans Affairs Victoria Kovacs Urban Design Integration Group Anton Vetterlein Friends of Terwilliger Parkway Amy Triscoli Urban Design Integration Group Jim Gardner South Portland Neighborhood Association Guy de Lijster Urban Design Integration Group Ed Fischer Homestead Neighborhood Association Elizabeth de Regt Urban Design Integration Group Don Baack SW Trails Mark Dorn Southwest Transit Partners Jeb Doran TriMet Carol Mayer-Reed Urban Design Integration Group Engineering&Urban Design Team Shannon Simms Urban Design Integration Group Urban Design Integration Group ZGF Architects VIA Architecture Mayer/Reed Southwest Transit Partners AECOM David Evans&Associates Parametrix 192 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT List of Appendices A number of reports,documents and plans have influenced the content of this Conceptual Design Report.The documents can also be found on the project website(trimet.org/swcorridor): A References B Conceptual Design Report;(Winter 2020) DRAFT Principles, Goals and Objectives DRAFT Project Metrics C Affordable Housing Memorandum of Understanding (October 2018) D Steering Committee Locally Preferred Alternative(August 2018) E City of Portland-Resolution 37393, Exhibit C(November 2018) F City of Portland-Southwest Corridor Inclusive Communities Project Summary(updated June 2020) G City of Tigard Memorandum of Understanding and Map(November 2018) H DRAFT Conceptual Design Report-Engagement Summary(Updated July 2,2020) TriMet Transit-Oriented Development(TOD)Guidelines(adopted May 27,2020) Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project-Station Existing Conditions Brief(June 2020) 193 Appendix A References City of Portland. 2007.Transportation System Plan.Available online at:https://www. City of Tualatin. 2014.Transportation System Plan.Available online at: https://www. portlandoregon.gov/transportation/67263. tualatinoregon.gov/communitydevelopment/transportation-system-plan. City of Portland. 2013. Barbur Concept Plan. Bureau of Planning and Sustainability. Metro. 1995. 2040 Growth Concept.Available online at: http://www.oregonmetro. Adopted April 2013.Available online at: https://www.portlandoregon.gov/ gov/2040-growthconcept. transportation/article/520786. Metro. 1997. Regional Framework Plan.Available online at: http://www.oregonmetro. City of Portland. 2010. Portland Watershed Management Plan - Potential Benefit of gov/regionalframework-plan. Green Infrastructure Improvements. Metro. 2009. High Capacity Transit System Plan.Available online at: http://www. City of Portland. 2016. 2035 Comprehensive Plan.Available online at:https://www. oregonmetro.gov/high-capacity-transit-system-plan. portlandoregon.gov/bps/article/581372. Metro. 2014. 2035 Regional Transportation Plan.Available online at: https://www. City of Portland. 2017. Central City 2035(Draft).Available online at: https://www. oregonmetro.gov/regional-transportation-plan. portlandoregon.gov/bps/73895. Metro. 2014. 2040 Growth Concept.Available online at: https://www.oregonmetro. City of Portland and Multnomah County. 2015. Climate Action Plan.June. Available gov/2040-growthconcept. online at:https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/49989. Metro. 2016. Opportunities and Strategies for Equitable Housing.January City of Tigard. 2005.Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan.Available online at:http:// 2016. Available online at: http://www.oregonmetro.gov/sites/default/files/ www.tigardor.gov/city_hall/comprehensive_plan.php. EquitableHousingReport-20160122.pdf. City of Tigard. 2007. 2027 Comprehensive Plan.Available online at:http://www. TriMet. 2016. Opportunities and Strategies for Equitable Housing.January tigardor.gov/city_hall/comprehensive_plan.php. 2016. Available online at: http://www.oregonmetro.gov/sites/default/files/ EquitableHousingReport-20160122.pdf. City of Tigard. 2010.Transportation System Plan.Available online at:http://www. tigardor.gov/city_hall/transportation_system_plan.php. TriMet. 2015.Southwest Service Enhancement Plan Final Report.Available online at: https://trimet.org/future/southwest.htm. City of Tigard. 2014. City of Tigard Downtown Vision.Available online at: http://www. tigardor.gov/document_center/CommunityDevelopment/Downtown_Vision_Summary. TriMet. 2019.A Primer on Station Access and Park&Rides.June 2019.Available online pdf. at: https://trimet.org/swcorridor/openhouse/parkandride/index.htm City of Tigard. 2015.Tigard Triangle Strategic Plan. Final Plan March 2015.Available Washington County. 2015.Transportation System Plan.Available online at: https://www. online at:http://www.tigard-or.gov/Projects/TigardTriangle/tigard_triangle_final_plan. co.washington.or.us/lut/divisions/longrangeplanning/publications/transportation-plan. pdf. cfm. City of Tualatin. 2018. Comprehensive Plan (as part of Tualatin Development Code). Available online at: https://www.tualatinoregon.gov/planning/comp-plan-development- code. 194 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Appendix B Conceptual Design Report- DRAFT Principles, Goals, and Objectives Li ' . OALS&OBJECTIVES Goal 1: Design and implement a safe, Goal 2: Provide an attractive and desirable Goal 3: Design to adapt to future modes and Goal 4: Support the completion of a multi- dependable transit project transit experience technology modal transportation network • Design a fiscally stable project to qualify for both a • Design stations and vehicle elements for universal • As feasible,pilot and incorporate new technologies • Apply a project station access modal hierarchy to competitive FTA rating and local financial access to build resilience to industry change and protect vulnerable users(pedestrian,bike)and commitment • Provide convenient and intuitive station access incorporate changing access modes prioritize shared use modes(bus,shuttle,car pool) • Locate stations to decrease travel distances points • Pursue strategic partnerships to creatively address • Provide facilities for active transportation users at betw een people and attractions Include consistent system elements and wayfinding first-last mile connections appropriate station sites MOVE AND CONNECT PEOPLE Apply a range of tools to the corridor to optimize that is easily identifiable to riders Maintain vehicular capacity of the corridor and ridership • Incorporate durable,easy to clean materials to minimize traffic diversion through neighborhoods Travel • Prioritize customer safety and apply principles of maximize quality and extend service life • Support partner projects that enhance station Patron Experience Crime Prevention through Environmental Design • Optimize facilities for human interaction,usability, . access and increase transit use Active Partnerships (CPTED)to the alignment and its stations. and comfort. • Facilitate local connections and transfers to Light • Design stations for clear and easy fare payment First&Last Mile Connections Rail service Goal 1: Maintain and strengthen existing Goal 2: Promote equitable access to Goal 3: Support creation of welcoming, Goal 4: Generate inclusive economic community and cultural resources community resources,commerce,and intuitive spaces for all benefits for people and businesses in the 0 o transit benefits corridor • Protect existing affordable housing • Connect to existing regional job centers • Design stations as high quality public places that • Support small,local and growing businesses Preserve Identified historic resources • Support mixed income and mixed housing will inspire future public and private investment • Catalyze industry,employment and commercial • Prevent cultural displacement of low income and developments within walking distance to stations • Design pedestrian friendly,comfortable and uses near transit stations disadvantaged communities of color,especially • Support regional initiatives to identify and create attractive streetscapes • Minimize construction Impacts MAI NTAI N AND CREATE established nodes of immigrant and Latino affordable housing opportunities on publicly ow ned • Support city adopted land use plans and initiatives • Maintain transparency to inform stakeholders of populations land near proposed station sites project benefits,impacts,opportunities,budget, EQU I TABLE COMMUNITIES • Celebrate diversity through contextual design and schedule elements that respond to the corridor's varied Corn munity Reso urce Preservation culture,history and community Access to Opportunity • Seek input from local stakeholders-to Identify assets within the corridor and encourage access to them Inclusive Community Vision • Minimize footprint of transportation facilities Goal 1: Preserve wildlife habitat and Goal 2: Be ecologically responsive and Goal 3: Improve connections to nature, 0 connectivity to the regional ecosystem support the natural environment recreation,and green spaces • Protect and improve existing plant,aquatic,and 1 • Seek opportunities to incorporate design treatments • Where appropriate incorporate new and maintain animal habitat that enhance wetlands and riparian areas existing green and open space into the project • Avoid flood plains and potential flooding areas for • Incorporate stormwater management best • Support opportunities to improve access to existing station location and/or access practices into project design to improve water and planned natural areas and open spaces • Support existing efforts to re-create natural areas quality and stream health • Maximize opportunities for future tree canopy in PRESERVE AND RESTORE THE • Avoid,minimize,and mitigate short-and long-term • Where appropriate,design using native plants project planting design NATU RAL ENVIRONMENT noise and light impacts on station adjacent natural • Provide educational opportunities to highlight the areas ecosystem value of the corridor Natural Resource Preservation • Avoid,minimize and mitigate infrastructure footprint Ecological Design in wooded and natural areas Open Space Access Goal 1: Build robust,flexible infrastructure to Goal 2: Minimize the Project's carbon Goal 3: Respond to and minimize the impact ■I fs r support community sustainability footprint of potential future hazards `lE Eh f • Foster regional and jurisdictional collaborations to • Where appropriate,include low-energy • Design to minimize impacts from known natural 1111/ integrate infrastructure into neighborhoods and technologies and renew able energies such as wind hazards ■1 1 r leverage related investments and solar • Locate and design the project to withstand • Acknowledge and design for development • Encourage low-carbon patterns of development extremeweather events DESIGN FOR THE FUTURE • adaptability • Optimize design for material efficiency and specify • Plan for emergency response Design for a changing climate low-embodied-carbon materials,including those • Where appropriate,design to minimize the Flexible Infrastructure • Apply best practices and standards to manage with shorter travel distances potential for human-caused threats corridor facilities,property,operations and • Encourage the use of low-carbon modes of Sustainability maintenance transportation to access the project Ern ergency Response • Consider project iffe-cycle when making infrastructure design choices 195 Conceptual Design Report- DRAFT Project Metrics Principle Goal Objective Lead agency Metric source tools Metric/documentation Goal 1: Design and •Design a fiscally stable project to TriMet FTA new starts •achieve Federal grant for implement a safe, qualify for both a competitive FTA construction rating and local financial commitment dependable transit project •Locate stations to decrease travel TriMet/Cities 100%of stations located within walk distances between people and Local land use plans(Barbur Concept distance of Land Use planned station attractions plan,Link Tualatin) locations •Apply a range of tools to the corridor TriMet TM Service enhancement plan, Ridership to optimize ridership mobility hubs framework,Shared transit way •Prioritize customer safety and apply TriMet TM design criteria/OPTED Achieve Safety Certification principles of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design(CPTED)to the alignment and its stations. 110 •Facilitate local connections and TriMet Non-integrated station access 6 of projects implemented. W transfers to Light Rail service projects.Southwest in Motion projects? Goal 2: Provide an •Design stations and vehicle TriMet TM design criteria/ADA Achieve Safety Certification attractive and desirable elements for universal access transit experience 2 •Provide convenient and intuitive TriMet TM design criteria/OPTED Achieve Safety Certification station access points L.L •Include consistent system elements TriMet TM design criteria Achieve Safety Certification and wayfinding that is easily identifiable to riders •Incorporate durable,easy to clean TriMet TM design criteria Sustainability Report(Target) materials to maximize quality and extend service life 0 •Optimize facilities for human TriMet TM design criteria Achieve Safety Certification interaction,usability,and comfort. U Q • Design stations for clear and easy TriMet TM design criteria Achieve Safety Certification fare payment Z 44( Goal 3: Design to adapt •As feasible,pilot and incorporate TriMet&Agency TM Business plan 2020-24 Goal 3, Target at least one pilot project to future modes and new technologies to build resilience to Partners Objective 25 implemented on SWC V„ industry change and incorporate > technology changing access modes • •Pursue strategic partnerships to TriMet •TM Business plan 2020-24 Goal 1, Ridership&6 of mobility elements creatively address first-last mile Objective 2 implemented connections • Mobility Hubs framework Goal 4: Support the •Apply a project station access TriMet • TM design Criteria Chapter 6 • Achieve Safety Certification completion of a multi- modal hierarchy to protect vulnerable • SW Service enhancement Plan • Implement Bus service plan at users(pedestrian,bike)and prioritize project opening modal transportation shared use modes(bus,shuttle,car network pool) •Provide facilities for active TriMet Mobility Hub framework #of station implementing mobility hub transportation users at appropriate tools station sites •Maintain vehicular capacity of the TriMet FEIS Compliance with defined thresholds corridor and minimize traffic diversion and 100%implementation of through neighborhoods proposed mitigations in the Record of Decision •Support partner projects that Partner agencies Station access project list Fund and Implement at least one enhance station access and increase (Wash Co,Portland, betterment project in each city transit use Tigard,Tualatin,ODOT) jurisdiction 196 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Conceptual Design Report- DRAFT Project Metrics Principle Goal Objective Lead agency Metric source/tools Metric/documentation •Protect existing affordable housing TriMet FEIS #of existing affordable housing units within each station area •Preserve identified historic TriMet FEIS-Section 106 Finalize memorandum of agreement resources with SHPO/FFA and TriMet with the publication of FEIS •Prevent cultural displacement of •Partner Agencies •SWEDS/BPS Inclusive Community •Achieve BPS development targets low income and disadvantaged •TriMet plans for BTC master plan communities of color,especially •FEIS? •%of existing resources retained Goal 1: Maintain and established nodes of immigrant and strengthen existing Latino populations community and cultural resources •Celebrate diversity through TriMet Design review and TriMets Art Achieve land use design review contextual design elements that program approvals respond fo the corridor's varied culture,history and community •Seek input from local stakeholders-TriMet&Agency Community Outreach plan #of community events/meetings to identity assets within the corridor Partners held.#of groups met with to seek and encourage access to them input. •Minimize footprint of transportation TriMet TriMet Design Criteria Sustainability plan facilities •Connect to existing regional job TriMet&Agency FEIS Ridership centers Partners •Support mixed income and mixed TriMet Document%and/or volume of Goal 2: Promote housing developments within walking TM business plan Goal 2 Objective 7 housing development and equitable access to distance to stations employment within walking community resources, distance of Station commerce,and transit •Support regional initiatives to TriMet&Agency Affordable Housing MOU Implement a Minimum 700 new units benefits identify and create affordable Partners housing opportunities on publicly owned land near proposed station sites •Design stations as high quality TriMet&Agency TM design Criteria and CPTED design •Safety Certification public places that will inspire future Partners principles public and private investment Goal 3: Support creation of welcoming, •Design pedestrian friendly, Jurisdictional agency Agency design criteria Secure local land use approvals intuitive spaces for all comfortable and attractive qtrppt,canpq •Support city adopted land use TriMet&Agency Agency design criteria Secure local land use approvals plans and initiatives Partners •Preserve and support growth of TriMet Contract DBE plans and worker %of DBE invoicing on Design& small,local and growing businesses apprentice requirements Construction contracts including targeting and increase recruitment of DBE/MBE certified firms for project contracting Goal 4: Generate •Catalyze industry,employment TriMet&Agency TM Business plan Goal 2,Objective 9 Percent increase of employment and and commercial uses near transit Partners retail inclusive economic stations accessible by transit benefits for people and businesses in the •Minimize construction impacts TriMet Conduct of construction plan Approved plan corridor •Maintain transparency to inform TriMet Community Outreach plan 6 of community events/meetings stakeholders of project benefits, held.#of groups met with to seek impacts,opportunities,budget,and input. schedule 197 Conceptual Design Report- DRAFT Project Metrics Principle Goal Objective Lead agency Metric source/tools Metric/documentation •Protect and improve existing plant, TriMet Avoidance of high ecological value Approved environmental land use aquatic,and animal habitat sites and establishment of protective review and state and local permits buffer zones Sustainability plan(Envision?) #of habitat functions addressed to enhance net area and quality of functional habitat •Avoid floodplain and potential TriMet FEIS Publication of the FEIS which flooding areas for station location Avoidance of floodplain, evaluates floodplains.Secure permit Goal 1: Preserve wildlife and/or access establishment of protective buffer approvals. habitat and connectivity zones,and mitigations of all impacts to the regional •Support existing efforts to re-create Agency Partners FEIS mitigation plans Sustainability plan and Local action natural areas plan.%or SF of habitat and natural ecosystem area created. (envision?) •Avoid,minimize,and mitigate short-TriMet FEIS mitigation of identified noise Implement of mitigation identified in and long-term noise and light impacts the Record of Decision. impacts on station adjacent natural ca: areas •Avoid,minimize and mitigate TriMet FEIS Implement defined project and infrastructure footprint in wooded SF of mitigation and proposed mitigation defined in the Record of and natural areas mitigations Decision. •Seek opportunities to incorporate TriMet,Agency,and Local regulations and permits Achieve permit approvals design treatments that enhance non-profit Partners wetlands and riparian areas •Incorporate stormwater TriMet&Agency degree to which project infiltrates, Achieve permit approvals Goal 2: Be ecologically management best practices into Partners evapotranspirates,reuses,and/or responsive and support project design to improve water treats stormwater over existing 2 the natural environment quality and stream health conditions •Where appropriate,design using TriMet&Agency Local regulations and permits Achieve permit approvals native plants Partners •Provide educational opportunities Agency Partners Degree to which educational Fund and implementation of to highlight the ecosystem value of opportunities integrated betterment projects the corridor •Where appropriate incorporate TriMet&Agency SF of new green/open space Fund and implement betterment new and maintain existing green and partners created(Project=station plazas, projects open space into the project stormwater habitat) •Support opportunities to improve Agency Partners #/$value of access improvements Fund and implement betterment Goal 3: Improve access to existing and planned implemented projects connections to nature, natural areas and open spaces recreation,and green spaces •Maximize opportunities for future TriMet&Agency Local Tree regulations and Achieve permit approvals and tree canopy in project planting partners Mitigations implement mitigations design #of frees planted categorized by canopy size(large,medium canopy trees) 198 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Conceptual Design Report- DRAFT Project Metrics Principle Goal Objective Lead agency Metric source/tools Metric/documentation •Foster regional and jurisdictional Partner Agencies Sustainability Plan and local action #of meetings held.#of partners collaborations to integrate plan meet with. infrastructure into neighborhoods and leverage related investments •Acknowledge and design for Partner Agencies Sustainability Plan #of structures/sites designed for development adaptability adaptability •Design for a changing climate TriMet Sustainability Plan Target;by 2035-45%below 1990 Goal 1: Build robust, emission levels flexible infrastructure to support community •Apply best practices and standards TriMet Sustainability Plan #of strategies implemented that sustainability to manage corridor facilities, reduce energy consumption and property,operations and emissions maintenance •Consider project life-cycle when TriMet Sustainability Plan %of total waste diverted from making infrastructure design choices project(#of trees repurposed?) quantity of durable materials installed(stainless steel,weathered steel,etc) •Where appropriate,include low- TriMet&Partners Sustainability Plan/Climate action %of operational energy reductions energy technologies and renewable Plan achieved energies such as wind and solar #of renewable energy point source projects implemented •Encourage low-carbon patterns of Agency Partners Climate Action Plan Complete Station area planning to development support density of development/mixed use near Goal 2: Minimize the stations;tie to Climate action/GHG reductions? Project's carbon •Optimize design for material TriMet Sustainability Plan(envision?) footprint efficiency and specify low-embodied- %of site excavations retained onsite carbon materials,including those or reused on project with shorter travel distances •Encourage the use of low-carbon TriMet Sustainability Plan(envision?) modes of transportation to access #of strategies implemented that the project reduce energy consumption and emissions •Design to minimize impacts from TriMet&Partners TM&Agency Design Criteria TM Safety Certification and achieve known natural hazards Sustainability plan pen-nit approvals #of parcel,or CF of oil remediated (Haz mat).Acquire DEQ permits. Goal 3: Plan responds to•Locate and design the project to TriMet&Partners TM&Agency Design Criteria TM Safety Certification and achieve and minimize the withstand extreme weather events permit approvals impact of potential future hazards •Plan for emergency response TriMet&Partners TM&Agency Design Criteria TM Safety Certification and achieve permit approvals •Where appropriate,design to TriMef&Partners TM&Agency Design Criteria TM Safety Certification and achieve minimize the potential for human- permit approvals caused threats 199 Ln o tui 1-i o csiZ .� C to — o oo O a, �, °: O a, E nv0 rk o ': b O V Z o U «G 0 a, y _ CO O O y m o N •z O A N , •'••• rn 4• 3 U a) o '� .° 73 o r a. O to �+ O 47 3 Z •y as *.: O U � E~ E� O 'a y D 0 c4 'G 00 rUi, n a, R. U d Ey ai -c N e� y c' G O E" U E QU, E 6. 0., i 0 cn Z gLT4 F, + ° o 0 0 0a 'o 0 0 F" �b .0 A tFi� IRw °�' 'otil " db a a ;� E"' G7 a x z 0 v 113 0 y .� = 00 -G L. En = a� N c C, a E$ O E" 1 rn ^ U 0 .o O rn '11 0 0 0 " cn o 10 W ix, f� ate, •5 �, o '� 0 :� ., c� H 3 E ao .V O i. :n U 0. O 3 r-. 44 co y 0 c� .=. o° Z Oacnx a' al ° Z o rn - 0 N o 0 '° y C o 2 00 w - W z _ -o Q o y' S m a, ❑ c. o 0 V q :1 o �, ° 0 0 •�. es .0 3 •- 0. c �+ IY, d j oiz.o ° .- U to . ct a. ,' fa. g ., 0 8 0 0 0 a. 0 :. A Gra O ..+ ..0 "D 3 Q„ [b C) .-47..• N cn 0 O O O6 2 v c,., •q . a) ca ° ,,, C .� N o t, 0 12 Ecr., o 71_ ,s 0., oV „, , r-T4 6T. U 3 o d• R, api 0 C.) p .n C - p0O o -t 0 aoi 3 ;4:. o , '° o = '� 0 r`Y'i > •... •-. U Z ° �_ ¢. U ate, E” 0;LIA U 3 oN = `� o F roat '6 E-.iU } 5 cci U c c 7) cti ° E = E o co W �..�ti) ° y am-. C a] a. 4E a. g O 0 t cv,C D � • •U [fit-. y 4] 0 til c N V a, c .D V4 v) F b-0 ti g N c••, O CD 1:11 g 1; o CL Q Q ZOO SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 0 03 0cam, 1 '= y O $ v 3 i = be 3RCvi a) U CI O e +. C yVy 0 y W y C) y_ N y a o a) y w • v •E . A o `� Cl o Cl ° 03 a' wa. 'o O acci 0.3 cn ° ao n cECA ctI)a0 `� c Cl)= Cl a) v, a - i Ell ai °cs •• C l U - 0 o a) .0 4., E-• -v v y -fl ClCl 4 3 ,• .. U a) tn 0U ,,..,C* 6'3 'O 0 O ..+ 5 C aa -' En .. O c1 U O d G O ua) v cs C O O cC CL •— C m c °CQE 0 U w . L .rv) '— E O aQC c C u a) .0 es i, C3 CL, 'EP ' Vl ' v, Cl) Q) O U aN 4 ^p 0 'C C G >, [J] t O y "G U p cri CL Cri et C O O 01 +-' O i . . 0cn "r' )> ' .44 C C r3 t Cyw , a ti) 0 a 4. r+ E a) '0 .� 'O E. „,ED vs :1r0 1... 0 ' O OO ED R' Cr s- y Q '� O w 3 'G N ,.= -o i c E .0 O O -C L ~ yC • O x0 cs 0 a d O n .� LC. Cl - i., 'G .0 O a) 0 Ci ClC CO LC a ¢• ' Qi a. � 4p V t=. .0 O C.13 0.v 5 Cl . CI tn 4a'E9 °- U UaCy ' y yC - "'F > y CC a. > el C V v.) 4 ° 0a) Qta ea r � a "" " ' ot.4o o. ao.0 O - a) " ^ E, 4 o .0a) a) n U iji 3OH C .= u C O O s. a) ) ' o a) -.5.4o CL C, I- 2v oo ci. et v G0 �, u oyci dU 0 c , ¢a s to a ' •Ca O - 0FC.- 'n •bU Ea 0 : 03 a) 0 • 3 >. • O ' to V) acv; ° E co 'L N C3 ) C C C a U] "G O ` . .ill JD > C O C - C c 0 'ca G .G . O =A OJ. C O 0 a -0 .— co Cl 0 y ii y CK V GC Cl. 0 U 4:2 �° ano 0 E o _ :-E. o•s, . r7 Cw y i �. W. o o 0o co ,y a, ,,, C U U 0 c0O ? C En U R. Orti. Cl Cl � O .y 0 v IL.) U ci Vrn - 0 'O >+ '� wO C0 . ati) ,.. . 0. 0 ?, +.+ y v 2 U O 'G O c v ?� y — Cl • y co , ••c; o f ` a3 - . 0 r 6 6 U so -En MO Cl 0 m E En a ', a ° '-0 -o cr 0 o 0 Cl � ED c 4Ja - mC'v .= la E-' .€ 2 - a) •� C .o •= � ELL 'O a) i.: CA es cs .E v reE a C .a C , .c cy U > cy C t... a 4. aE .y .O, o C cn C C rAN + z co Cl G c, G CL O CL v aO O C ._ 'i ', O r H Gv . 3E. s QG U ...= U GO O m O C . 0 G r O U 0. CN , . OO 0 -C C O 4 a a) Ew •- • E--. c.) tZ F. t. a) 5 .° E• yU x cc) Cl 0 2 y tn. °L° a) .0 cfl v n GO 1:4O ... N O 201 0 a) a) ^n U 3 �, o a 0 Z a ati ali '� 4r '� `° aUi a �v+ U o 'o 0 0 0 R. A. D O O 3 a) y' •O as aJ • Y 4 0 a) ai O a v �: o 0 c. O. a) a 0. en W C al C. .0 �1. 00 .o U c. o R. 0 E. a o o En o N s y0•, 0 C3. 0 Q+ bO a.i 202 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT .=. -O u � -o w. o L U o 0 -O v' �. to x w c� ,� a) x y ,� es a) no ... 0 O u - > +' L, U O 0 c w s ye y a) O v a y > ,- O a. ' U to U •'.. g ..= b4 O' U a m > :, - bA o ai `�" cc Ti uU. p coSy U ca c .+ U L a) CO U v1 U CS Cl, !" -o U O a) R, 4" Z 0 ,3 C 0 ami ›, Q ai Q ° C ami ?, 4 fa rg >, -Cr a 0 •-o i . o w 'y — - 3 ° Q y o -0 0 v a) O. cU, tC.i 4� •N OC X 0 y 0 O. O "O c,- .N O LL. 0 - C cs O. 4�cli O vi G U y - a. a) a) csco 0 vi vi cn U E. R. p -0 .0 O. c.7 rU, c in 0 O O. .. 4. c� F-' cs ytr.j RU.. el U O O n K = CAul C = 0 O y C ti •r i; .c—3 h 'd 0 = V2 cd 4i . 0 ...En at CD 0 U >, v� in 3 a) >, 0 r o a) . 0 . Y -� C O o �. 0 ,A u co w >, EI -c o 3 a0i cs vs = 0 U tii •y 4a k oU _ �o r,A °c+ a 0 c.7 E c4. G O •Cil •.+ a. L 43 •ey 4. ^� V �, C v G U ++O O 'p O "0 U E 0 MO Cl.) .C 0 p 0 O a) +-' es 4- 0 o ez nv O �' U m 'Ors w •C r 0 O H > C 0) O a0i 0 U v a) o .n 3 ° 5' U c c U — i– -0 -o U c-. a U O -in s.. U ,s 43 U .� �, 0 '� cd U O p 4-. O > •� j C O a) • r .� > y 0 O C O U cs �. C U a) -ti 'O a) U U -v .O .0 "Cl , to 0 > C U > >, cz 0 4 C o1,1 s y 2 C 8 es •C 4�.., ate) G o ai b y o 0 48 O U C >, L U O. y' U cs r'. O a) 4-' >> 0 y) rs c, _� O C a) 0 +� ) U a. o o U Q U fu Q. O rs r c� xs. v U a. O y ° a "C 6) = cs cn c3 L -0 U O cl rn CI v) 0 '0 DG L. «. O p 'FA 4. c3 ... L. a) el R. p 1:1p ';A O 4. .... L •y CL a) O o C a U fl. C j 1... tv 0 ti IU3 >, C, U •+. 15 1.4 O -p C C c�3 to "O '� �– co 0 "O ¢, a) O = > co 3 p`o E o x > .) •�, c u -oi 3 c o o U > T., T 0 c00 -0 a, 0 o w c°) a) o .0 epi a) w w. a� C a) o -a ei ami ,�V . i -0 0 C U 0. 0 y O 'O cOa 2 u 0. a) 0 y Cse = -O U F" c`. S 0, cn 0 a a. En C. H 0 e ros a. v0, v0i C u. >-..0 . a. FC-' es . es Fes— o0 0 N cos L aJ 0 Y U 0 203 rid t 0 0 y .0 y 'ti 1-. .� 0 a O 0 rs c U V] t '0 c N N a4 f74 y ai .0 o ° a :d o a°. r, co c a n •m •a ° 0 3 -0 o . 40 c rn o ›, a 0 ..O ,b 'rt. C N >. •0 O a% ... O 0a > w O '6. C - O I) O 0 0"0 w EA i.; U 'Gy mo G cs • 0 to ?� O U y iri > U o 0 0 4) 0 y 4— U' +�. "Cl a) �A O a) U •o a 0 .o i). .a U .��_. y to d O C .�+ I 0 -0 0• vi 0 0 UU ; 0 p,1 y u] a) 0 to >, E E ° 3 O tn 0 U �' l� 0 ° •,- •40. C4 O -0 '" ai O = a) •- .G 0 'V ul > u ch ea 0 � a) O CI U' E a) 0 0 w p4 al 0 -0 0 0 •... ° ,a) -o t 0 `� 0 .o 0 a) o LIIT 0 c� V >, `° .>', •i� CO 0�, r+. c,, - •., O a) - 4-• • -o 0 0 0 0 "0 "U.. U a) eo ° U •., v� 10 i- U w t~ ai„ -0 0 'i. U U c� - a) r+. a. c5 0 o � 0 a) ,O - o = ^ �+ O y N a) '' cd O .U+ ryn — 3 y CLI rn .�. cr. `� an -o o •C u° .0 —E ii •0 0 '� Cl* �, " o 0,, c -v :n b ran u L S. >, > o 0 > O 0 -. 04 O L. ed L N ' a. O — eci g .,, I.. O cd O. L -0 0 0 `ti a) 0 I� ..+ -o .. o o c� o a- a a,) a. tc a, o '0 a. o U' 3 to 4• 0 re) rn 0 ` . }, o U `+" •^' C > `g 0 ``F' al `}. 0 a) a) U' v) IU, o L.0 •y ° a) �' .-: 0 5 0 .9 czt o 0 ; •3 .moi c co L p� 0 .0 y „0 •9} 3 eti 3 u a. �' .�. >, U C .r 0 0 i.. .= _ a. 3 a. C N e3 a > 0 0 V - 0 .3 C U 'n U 0 U 4•. 'b > e. 0 ice. O 0 a 0 0 C a.. "Cy aS o :b o •a y• ... rn .o 0 Cl] ~ ct� a. O ° �" a. 0 ° fir ° k o 00+ a 7 el V _ 0 '0 a) o a) 4. CA > 0 a' `i•. C a. Vi b }' W U '.mss L. •3 0, •3 U 0 ,- .- .0 0 0 cs o 0 'v o 0 co ao) 0 > O a, >, 0 i 6 >, g 'r >, 0 c0. [/a �' O p U C4 3 U '� 0 N Q U y ., 0 .0 ••C c cid 01.o.. 4 c� L• a) o •tU• = 0E a7 a] 0 0 • E O C :o 1— ct 5 0 o CO b a) c� ,D Ci b al, co 0 , Co •0 41 U 0 4- u e'+ O 204 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT vs >, 0 to 41) 8 to CO ca G E 2 Q. 0 o O -0 y 0. O 0 L e03 ••C o°, t oo •rs •� u 0 o" .ti 'a u o a 'Di 0. 0 5 a 0 ' 0 td c0 C) a) a., > a. a, U O . cS Q, .r -a o ti 0 0 y 0 3 0 rL'a t4 «. to 0 rs ° " ^8 3 --. y; O >, -0 +O. O P'. O 20 i.. {'"' '7n C] 0 g 0' 0 , '0 aL > U U -c O O 0 En O CA . O Q, rS o to O •O w +. O 0 �, 0 d O ih 0) .0 0 > — tO E VS 0. 'ej a C w 0 C 0 [ O c� �+ 's o .. a•. .b 0 = O •3 a., '0 0 C) 'b 61 a C) O Ca ti) y �C3 ❑ V " C) /) 0" to U p C) el g "O U trd a0 0 --� E 7 0 .0 .r C) 1 Q O G, Q. an 0 " •C 0 a., «. 0 03 'C) 0 co O o ,t >, aE) Ts "E o o c, th ° 0 0 u 2 to O u O c� �E» — U E :� 0 V ? 205 ed >, "a 0 n — ▪ •..... vi CA w 0 a) .b 3 U 0 o o �., •0 �. ai CO .b CO a L' U cC .c . a o .. •`� a .= 0 a a LA U O CA t. 0 up 4. 0 CC 4-. - U CC O ... N t'+ i O / - 0 -t U O O a C 3 G o. C G71' O V .� en P. y C3. C vi CO O OL V y 0 cis _ O yC w 0 — O CO O a U _g rn {q 0 O 20 a) ":o a) 3 N _ O •- -o a. u E 0. CO• a) 0 o -o o0 a. a CO ° Cl) U O ^ a. o COcd 0 Tu. eC U 7 ,= vi a. • M o •9 - U N > 3 U O :� U U 6.Gin U 3CD a. ;ti 70 03 -Uo t O at' O co co -o E -° 7.> .o E U E w ka) �, a o.. VI U 0 �° U E el MI ° 0 e 0 O N . y in y `vii y t a ',° U v L -o O i) 0 > a� o . n. 00 '° p o C = 04 o 'c m C CI 3 O .c b [+ .�a +`.. c.) 0 o C, 0 a. Cs. e cu2 R E U .0 O ULO 3 a ° bc> .O = U ,tiy° -0. n as � i � s CA U+- +▪ ' i i 0 to el CC U pn . . c� 03 U a) Uy pQU ' O En OEa 3 g ed 'CI 'b �+ cd. _ a. to C c7 }C czt co y .0 U el ". U - U • O . = u • OaO. Cl) tef~ a) 1:4) Vi Cl) t N CO 'O c12 N "0 ,0 }WLiOO �' os.." ¢+ c�U UO_ U 0 3 c w c t �. E V O. 0 n a' U a ctl ,b 3 OA a 'c f.• a cn U O 0 w U i..cu c� �° p, .n ccs ,u •C 0 o fi, .C. .b [ U• O" O. U a.ti cl. �' "O 4 0 U 0 U U 3 O �•. U el v1 I-. et) •O :E �. c 5 th ^ U > 0 C a) 3 •E 0 U c° H a 1(5 y O a U co •Z 4r 3 7, y .d O O ›N N O, .O ••V 0 4--, 0 4 "0 X �. > U O 2 . > a) a.) cd ci, 3 az 3 a� U a o O ° 0 U -c U 0 s.„ 'o 4-+ s.., U b N ° y a) G ,'�, v , n 0. •:r P. b '' 'O .n a+ ��', U +�+ O U U 'O C ea '� U !Imo+ cti 8 U td ... it H a) E g n U cn u 3 E U .4 3 H 0 H �1. 0. 0 -a ao a •.. .x cd o o a �' a V 0 U 206 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT �O Oy 0 w vs = CO •O S m .00 c a O � ° 0 oL) m coalfa) 0 o 0 C a3 ° 'ti ' a) OvwO fl'b c5 Ch a 0. c. •0 Ly o � a) o � o .4 0 0 a - " C. 0 vteL ° E 0 �4ai-7: 4.. co Q] •O ) ca . W, O -p . to > 0 -5zy w 0 s yo0 y A 0 9. U 0 4"., > rn 0 0 '° CI,m to 0 .�' i L V U v 0 Lrr- O O 1 • O 0 ,O 'E' 0. 0y 7 Q 7 O C. 3 _0.,•aiU Q E O o aL. 'b15 C • co >, aO 2 o C ,� U O 0 cu O0 ' = 4 y 'u; 0 0 = 'a 2 � • ,.O G � U CO ) O CUVo by 4r Li] gO O - .- 4. 0 Gy t). 0 O b4 oU. O m +0 U - C vI O .0 U y 6 c •y Co -0 Li, R, 4 ) -0 J _> a 0 t2 O • o� Q) )C O -O v Li -o -o x E 'v; >, a0) oo -0 s 0 > o i C o E 0 0 e o C cz ° cos cos 0. a 0 44°•, E F o m cL:s o c 0, ,0 ra c� o -0 a) c c, a G v 0 'd i ate) ; '•o 4`*°. ° ani •0 •0 c,.,, c3 - 3 -o o. •- cUs ami 'o '+ I°, w c� Cl +›+ 6n7 y c03 y' w ° -0 -0 6ti/ a 6' >, >, °) Cl o y +. v -o °) 0 0 a. . [ ti. � U r3 2. . Cs c > e3 0 O c3 Am t0 '45 m ° ttS o 'o O F- U U O to 0. 3 4 as °) > 0 0 Cl ,4 3 .� 6- o o cs -a r 3 G -c E o 0. .= as o x 0 0 c - o o 0) °, ? = u m - Lo a� �a U Q o a c ° o ° o c o �. 4. o ° o Cs, -o v 3 cs rn C c� in `s ¢" co — O to v o 0 0' ; > N a") o cl WI 0 t o o = 6 co ° = co c to c •o •0 , 0 0 0 no .0 c.) c V .o -o C1 p•' ai I. v .5..% c.: a ••a °0) - Cs. ani O. 0) g ccl GO'o o_ 0 ate• [n .r c. LC ta „C -G O O 4r o a O .0 C x -0 O a O to O 3 O .-. c O Vf ea O I•" r-+ 0 • 'O �- 'o :. .r r/1 :. Q] v� O ` G± }. CO .-. as no 4-, •3 c E � ' o G c >, ❑ 0 o > 0- o w o > Cl 0 0 E•r O O a) o O O 0 0 0 Q 0 0 O d 0 0 a) C 0 0 c 4- 0 ° o U U i. .-. ° U U U F U s ❑ m 3 ro .o IX .2 0 U 0 3 0 0 ,4 " c c U -v ° ° > > •> ... • •.. w °) > E E-� -o .. > > > 0 03 E— o.. o ,ci O ry V 00 L 0J .Q 0 a.+ u 0 207 0 p al L y • ^ 4+ ��o 0 ._ -6 a a) a ..c to 3 a En al) 4-, O a. .� ri) O •+. C) .:. O Ca >> O a. U O a. r... a 3 a) Cl) 4- . 0 .L al — O -a cn c a ^-" O N c En O Cl) > 'O U •v G — 0 'O En 0 E 0 a 0 p U p - 0. En cu cn ta)- - ipa•a c O �>' p . .O c U .° > ca a °' o °c 0 0 ao a. , . a ,-, A , > U = -c 4., ,'$+ a c.) . +-� a) ° c 1... I.1 el `° '� °) 4 ZZ) •v� to 7, .0 0 0 o c'0' 'v. '' `'" `�` > -WS co = ,.,.3 a ta) ... c C) o c o �C 4 .0 cC -v c c E a) aa'. iii 0 'G o . a U U co "a C a L a) O tiI. 32 C' .4in C G El '0 "O '3 U Cti E E= o ° o 'a , 0 0) -a a. O ,c 0Y 'c O c � Lba Fa a, °, ,= O -�. 0 " G c cz O c 4•r O , a .... .. av U a) + c U 0 •` , . . ,•.3b ad . .= E* - O a ca C a cn E - c ¢' -0 ai = •- T3 > a• U 'L : ° e v° a. . °, ? u, =▪ 1:11) � Cl = a •3 a g3 0 � N ok O O a, E - O y >, ‘_• a ..0 .- N a f .m C +4c., � Wa) 1CS... p ay 4.. U c 0 b c L �ipO. t 'a Ca .m. O a La) a 0 yCcga U O + c R. a, a. C to ccis .� 3 'G 0 : ) y 0 O O 4- c ["▪ ' i +' .. O ac O — L 4' 0p Oa L, i ¢' rn Ct) y • a) , 0 U > F0 c 'a 0 0 4 0O '-' a. RI O -b -c •.3Oo O 0 0 0 U a) x a ..0 E a c c 0 S? O a) , O Ca OpO O c � c -50 g E a) 0 a 0 0 °, c x> va) ' > -a . 0 c a 2c a .A >° E Enms0 to oEv • g v a E-' -n 3 8 3 .= . 3 a -8 r N... h ea C) O Y U vi 0 208 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT c -o 0 a7 o U En c ri_ -b On .° E c tO :. --0 3 U 4 o a 0 C4 v E • el) Cto col a3 C e� O U COO tO C '. y UF. "3 cE U ++ 0 0 U .. c Ca. U t+ Co) QE O U G • 'v3G y o cELec > 3vi O '� - 4-2 U C Ot. C>, L 0 df a3 U ••-.a. U O b lib E w E o .o0 E o E 5 a' .3 E aa C M O E Etg > c Uh5 > � , c to oo¢ 'V C to w s 'L, ° 3"tip 4-. c ci Ve C > A to = U es ;1 Cd ?/ -c -Oc C 4 E- ^ O to E to -cC vi -b O` U Oo - •c p 'b C1 r I- Q D C E vi O Co Q e3 ++ O . .4 ) s Ct*0' - y c 0W O 67O - y c C 0 QU Q ' 0 E. DO 0 p ca p z �0 � � el U 'a '� C.c3 .. • C � •C3 O �3'+" Q ,Q 43 r2 O _L _ L tO - . ,5 [ir � "O t3 0 0. I. - C " V 0u °r a0 _ og y8E ¢ tN to > v wel o O E 8 i � c , E -o > 1-. w 6. 0 0 C O D — U . el 0 Eo> m5 ' ›' to a0 th ¢ •QcU, C U = •) a w>, On ' > t3 at4 .LU Cl,OnaC" Cl a) cs 0 .c0co a O c ° Q1 p C - C. d C L. . i R vi 8 4, o0riE -o3 00 amQ ' c ° E c • o y o E v -U , . L C c dO asoc C.) c U a� co - c 6 E e-) t0 s iE p cU a to EO `� +On c c e, a CO at -o V O V c 'a. a 0 O 0 C .0 �' w - c -c E 0 > -o 0 U O a. ,n gO wO c E 'E �-. .ct .611 "cc DO' ID i,U O �o E >, 'U E tO vi U. 0 'v, O 1Cd v O el ca > c R -, p cd c3 «. 0E) C" 0 . U Sal >, ,c a U4- 0 ,0 0 :=,.. .c.) A, CdoE .E av; ° c 0 o - E . , a � i 0 c . oc " 0� cU o ya. 0 Ey ' E o • 3 .0 o°' •40 a a - D ) a o 3 ° > - 'el aa. U 0 N0) En 'cc. U c55 �• CJ >, Q .0 ca3 O Q. cL.3 U c.i-. a U, C ' Q E 'C,.c 5 + c v3b E 9l o • ,oc yE0 c i > oc . .E CO 0 o F 0 v a, >, a. , 0 0 0 3E. b v „ c m - V U .t .y > C C C • Ink 0) ..'ii. a Car ] Is V. EC0 8 30o U r y 2 O 0 G ] O O E O •Cn0 a � -,5, .c i c oa...0. c•,_. C Q. �P. asC ° ocac • to Ec co c Cd H ai a CO Ea) a) 0 'i3 ) to y c .Ewc a US .fQ L .0 «CC y U to C 6>7 C U 3 +' vO CCEO a. I-1 rcC C 0 C C v 3 L. rJ A+• G > O r4 0 F" � 0 0 ti4 y ^ 0C CI CO FO YC L" t 'p O LC), 0., ..c O O y = C3 ¢ .0C 4 'res 5 O 4-i tO � "D c 0 U X/ � -d UO N CL , ." - T L, p . C , C •p3 p C '� C y s, cNc G = UG' - Ud0 = t4-,. p 0 c 4. di O to > 00m U O U -O W U O U i . O O U WI E c0 F ' 2 L., to n Do O 209 0 a� I. y o �' a� a? to a .4 a) a ° 4. o •- 0 C° �, LI- - tb a. o Cn, U JD U H cfl O C G cct t ca A �_. 03 O 4 11 0o. i E � 0 0 0 Gc y u. Vi "Gcc:I O — cid a.) 'O cu U cti '� .2 p OLA ,n 1-. 0 0 O N W 0 +p0Gs) = -0 s• 0 o a O O a.• es O . R. 'O z ti cn CS a O 0 VO .r y 0 03 •.. O 0 :� t� =F" O O ill cn O ▪ .r LL •V es cd En E O a.) O g 0) 2 E 07 � • A O 0 .. > o 0 U .r 3 rn U G 0 O C ,0 .b v' cb 0) 0) to 'p i >, 0 O O , Oi Or 0 rn OZ E O cn 'O p y N 0) ▪ "" a) C � .- CA 0 Cd GGA 0 C) ,� O▪ .,.••• cd 'd a.) [V 'C C .� •0 eti 0 e0 O t}.h = O z .S ...; O q O ++ L a) O- 0 0) W 0 O.. o ca O w C� cn al +Fr+ 0U1 Q3 4-',-, .O 0. cil y V) 0) 0) •6▪ 7 03 CI = 0 0 • o w .� O p op ., 0. 70 R. Q. V 4 Q. O C 2 0 O ,., .� w 0 rn E 0 -, O 1-1 03 U F'' O H rt 3 C U +0. CU 0 0) N cri .c ci zi -74 a e a cis of ° n, o ... U a, O 210 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT N .-i a) '4.41: to a. p a co i IU CI. `0 / c CT 0A O \! h. I ❑ `" ❑ ,U O > ` CA ��? a0+ - c 1 O �' O a at r 0. , A*, 6 L w 0 % S i OM g O ) C • �" C, s, U 'LI y • 0 " y� kilklb HA m A POi) w A g mw A O `- ca o C) U •0 Ca Acoj t ot i 0 . 'C H 0 n G ❑ 0 ❑ I.O .16 ttV .a +..' �. O 0 .. kr co Q y y I CO T. '-' Il 0 4. 4.1 o a 0 c ;- 0 N o 0 0 3 0 � " CO- �' �-. >,, a .' ,.E cn a o a 0 V 0:1 c4 A 0 mU ❑ ria my 0 8 211 Cl) m U_r -I 0 a Cl) > I. a L k Co Z (/3 " •C h a bn = • C 0 ' ,,a � G 0 �J 4..OU o c,,) ill xr lO� U V A0 O• \ ..1.__'...‘ (..) .... I.: Cr O V O .1 y O :0 3H aaQ '� A ea 3 m2 A J S E E 0 U 0 `' b U 4�r A or a. a ry0 o o0 N 0 Uo4 2 A A 3 U U 0 212 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT < M }, Ca M }, O ti C tea) +., N ) To M co a1 . o vi v a-, Y 4A co co Z a) a1 C LL] Y +_+ C a O C C C co C N a1 +-, C 'a co v) O a1 v 0 a1 +' co m +' } ° C a) i U U UOA Q co N c Q1 " CL cu .� Q a--� L C " co CO LT U N . , +•_, U a1 to ?� +, ;} N C N v a1 d " a1 co L o C N m O V -0 C +�- O 0 a1 m O a1 N Q CD a) a) Q co +� a) ? co C co }, co a1 .� .> a1 v (° .0 v ° Q +�—, c co CU N + v }�— a v a1 c v C > o +, L C t " _c a1 0 ,n c p cu ;4E 11 Sm O Q 4- co a1 C 0• Q N = v cu 2 "� -0 " +� � ._ v a1 = 3 v -0 .c CC " o " c E U > a } _c a1 C H 4••+ Q api cocu CO LE • 0 c _a C tA W E O —C aco E u c , en v w Ni' o v 7 c ° ;- c c v 0 C tin �, L } " 0 Qa) 0 v O C i 0 v a, " oOD 0 3 v E 3 a _c _. C u CU •- c°Av M J +' C0 on `~ �' c C o v 4- L a ° Q C C p v O v L by a1 c v L (n = U O N Q C C — U U U O C • C > Q O C +' Co0 " " (••• U C V .� U O V •W .p C E E -0 C N c a) w +, a1 C C o a Z -Na ++ i hA E C a1 i c'o >— 4 " `_ D N a) N 4- c , F v N u 0 °° E a H o ill c�a ca a1 n3 O U O a c = C a1 L n .� (n 'a to +' p i to i a C " +., 0 CO a) c " U a) v v - ti.o a L Y o v c �■■� �' = p c c cco v er a) < 4 L I- CO w H co- v a 5 0on a1 a te= �' 0 ° v 0 v a, v .� m ° `+° o • 1 n O " (o i N i i C C C C C coC aJ " • v+-i v C u -Pa) m a1 a1 Q E a E O C +, O c E z LL CC II c Q a; C " 3 a1 ° O a1 � ri nj a1 a1 cy' a1 v ( '- C O +., U +� •— " +' c +' a- C ° .o .3 . a (Cr)) Q m C C U C C o �' b0 U C O Z " p O +� cu U v co J t L +' ° O +, C p_ W aJ a) v v a1 a a v 'a a1 v •'� 'a pp LJJ a)C N h0 a.+ a) a1 > .> cc cc .> cc O - E 2 OA Q Olij " a1 = C O 47. +' C as C a1 a1 O a .14-I 2 O rT:s Ts N C c=1 o a1 aJ O O o O +� +, t C C O X Q + w O •(., U CU a) a) v i L •– to 0 i O t > E Oi -O U O E U +� +� + E o C -' a) - a) o o " .� i O a1 •-, +, 0 C .,.7.4","' < Q Uj O `� +' W o `� ��// a1 a) — co U C nO - v v N OU w +C•, '3 +C-, ye " a) E L C a. V) a1 L L • • • a-., C -, C CD^ , n 0O ^ " Y 'p N _c co co riaC E 2i E CD_ r-I H 2 a of H a1 }' err +-, Q H co * 0 H _ Q OU u 0 Q 213 L -O Q O O C C U L(1 L C -1--) •(+Jn (R6 C a a O 0 - N (o �_ O L n (o (n C 4-' -0 C a X to - C C OU fin D Z L +-• a) a) u a L `- L +' co a) to X coa) 0 _, c U +, C a L O LC) C LiJ i O t N d Z "' Q 4--, co vi a C +' in N N ,as p +' c an O n C c C +� '> v co V) Q C c a c ^ — co (o H a) co +, - a) _ v, H a) C o (Y6 .N •V C - C i Y a +�-' a +� C co N M U t •co to o O L N p a U — a C c to m H L (o +' -6 a a [6 (o ▪ c (o a O pp t . +, dA C •� a a i O C i v) U _U L L C C (oa) iZ (o +, n D_ D L 0 7 N a) 'pp O O a) O cro m O C = a) L o a) a) a s (o U v u o _c -a 3 +•� — N 3 +�' -a D_ v, ,, (a6 +C +i� a -a ro (o O +�., Q C a I� >j m cc 003 L C a E C (% RS 0 v C C 7 co tco p v rl 0 L (o C O 0 Z t D 0 a = — L +� Lro a U aA C C `~ j a vt .4 ' E (o (7 7 C •- a) m C O N - C co ro o 0 u 4 (o > c U p U .to +' Z 34 o m CO WD O i i +> n (o > +n U O 0 +� C 2 C (r1 > >- C C L +-� O vi (n .0 C L C — L Q (B a) co a D_ L a) C •C •- a > _ a O N a 4-' O m a •U Lr; t E o co `L° > a 3 c a N ani M C t O o a mo C °) • v' U -5 > c +, Q c 3 0- t 0 Q- < C U +' L ao ✓ a a_ N O > D >• a f Q (n 3 `n c o o t o Q > v aci +' +' op a c acn (0 E n a c c� o — o o (� up > 3 vi v, +, m � E Q 1-1 ;4= N +�' 0 C cLo U ro �) a d a +� w c C Cl.) p '(� C L (n L O O C vi a co +' a 5 L +' 0 -6 vi E +' O L an 0 C (n aJ m (o N 6 U �o (o 0 O O t (n +-, a w p c u +a, U' C cu C C •L h.0 O Z U i .� Y -o D_ -o U U C +a, (o +' Q a 0 0 c a c a) a) C U 0 C C vi C i C (a C C +, (/) Q a 0 a > >- E . D_ f0 a a •- (o a (o +' O a L C v) co L 3 a) -O (o O p a s +� +� X +, C -p n (, C '� LL L a O (6 Lf) a +' Y a (/) .� C L O (o L L a +' 'O n 0 U C —' E -0 E O a -O 2 C L C 0 (6 ca O C — (6 7 C L C C n U M O 0 L- E N W L CO CO N +, G D_ a) > C +' +' o 0 7 >. U U Y a C CO +, +a, i o 2 a) +�, O 7 7 C (o Q C •- +,; C (o Q O >O QJ+' > a) _0 ,+-�' N `a +a, v O 7 -O _6 O O m Oco v a+-' ) (6 a) . ° dA Q- fo f6 0 ut a C C a) +' a Ln O t C m +' a +, a) (o N L +' — -O L C a) o +s- L C L to O a) C a = U (o L ° (o -0 OA (o C +' a a) C a) a a) _a U C —_ D_ C O L a) C 2 L a) O a) a to > > Y +, C , O_ 7 a _Q a) 5 L L L to a, +• CO (o OU (6 E > > (6 (o Q c� C LO >ra C in C Q 0 L U CC 7 O a '- 00 C >., CO C 14J U Y m C v C a a +' +�' C +' L � +' a +' -.6_, L a)LE +� U a +, a a) 4- C a -0 m -6 L- s') C o U c +' v; • a4- v, o c 5- U o a n 0 co t� ,n v al E o C (to U c pC v >O j o i O C 7 z +, C O a) — +' o h0 C D C L 6 O O N dA C a (� — -O O ro >- (o .3 v, 0 o C O a 3 a) E c ro v c O 0 > a O 3 c Q `D — -0 >, CO cu ai .O `n U a) > E a f6 L .0 '+',n C +, a J >f6 V C 0_ C to C f6 U C ,+, C C U' C 0 N H O o L a) C > C o < a) > -O +a, C +' tt C = bp C +' fo c- co 0 CO 0 U +' -0 (Uj C +a' > O C (o f6 . N l0 C (Lo Q c C C (n 00 C U c L c , t +=,, tv3 CU an ''Z to (o (o OU Q coo v) c Y c - _ O t1A -a ' �_ (p M C • a) p 0 +' a ▪ L a C a C 3 - p U a a L a 0.- v '+, H LJ vi > c) •� i C to D_ > C 3 co O C C -O be '6 -O C H +, _ tn C C L +, (o ' Lr) C 73 L a O L L C a) 'a O O +' a) a a C — C — (o a) a `~ C L (o a as .� f6 C a L o >, a (o O L C L o a) L a L p '7 0 '7 0 L - (Lo c L — c Q vi.. E 7 - C co H D_ D_ -0 N U 0 O (o D_ 0 -0 0 o 0 U m U m L 0 +' '(o +' +� o f6 tea) aU) o •°A m E i FL) • C U L ;} +-' ,- L a C - O O • • • • • • • • • • - D_ a U 3 L p D- VI •0- a C v O (n O +, O C v E C a) `4_ i) v L a) o 4- N L H L 1— _a a) D_ L H CC LC) CO L +., 214 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT a CD 4 4v-. c> Ci a) - O � _y >, v) C O �e a) cc: cu C co ,+� i +-+ ro .- N on C Q N ro __ C Ut w a) >, '^ +, ) 3 C 3 O N C a) a) ra C •� O a) �^ j. '^ O a) V C •`" 7 E > co ` t � ° >. r6 4 7O a) 0 CC a O v`�, i N E 0 ca a I— CO bA U 'O c Y p ate' ra O a ) C C a) -c -o '+C ° i _ C O O +� i o 7 § cu .2 _c E oco CD u `� v bO u 3 C +, a +, CCa +� p +� o O Q -a -a C o c u—N, a o o 0 '47,0 o C t E o aa) v' C C t -C = bA O U o CCv 0 co a) v) +' } c c p ra +' +' C O C a to +' cn bA O a) a) co p z v cu L s :Pm v c s 0 o o - C +� al V) C a) a) • v -6 .E n v .2 a) U +' a) to C O co O C O v, u N N to N b.0 o a) p U +� Q• ai co +� o ° O 1D coCU ° Q v O ° ° a) v v U a) +- -a v, E ate-+ C LY., +�, C a O a v E a) C -o ra+� vi c 0 a CD v v C a, E p v C X a) a) co C a) ° > a) 0 i N E v, co 4 ra a) E ` ^ v, 7 Q E p ca _ a) C a) C C a -0 MO -0C >- +' v N L a) U CO _C > N C • L oC u a) .0 C aJ O O O Q 0 v, v n m a) aJ > C C 0 0a) -0 a) bA ru U / E U v, _C C C V +, 0 L +� >•• C to O O N E U a) 3 `~ a) _ `� E C > E 'O U '6 0 +, bA Y rrf C O S +, +, to p E I . +, N C +O, CD = U C C L C C V `I 'v, C a) 7 a) L >. to U E CZ C +O, a p 7 p a) '47, p o ra to a) p a) t +, L > .— co 'ca ro N u -c C E •,— +, _ _ 4- a) a) 0.0 a) 0- +, v, x o ° E v, f° s 3 C 4 > — U '+' a a) -0 L L U E -p — •U 0 +' a) u_ co 'p •- 0 Co CO N CD ° i C N +_, a) > as i C CU CU > Lf) C 4-'tev, i E O a) '+, of a) 4p ra a) N a, J8 v 4- C co C C 0 a v � °; CDa) v bc° _ C p CDa) ,} ° L v o N ra S L ° i >_ .0 0 i C ate-, -O O bA bA Ccu -o U — ,t.;), O 'Cr) - a) C 7 MS +' +, _c a) a) v, N (a L ro s_ m C -0 ra 7 C ro a i +, L a) O C > cn v VI a a) o a co _ i •v, •L E o a) .E ) Q 'C o d LL) CD O a) bA a) C cC6 CO H CU ut m -p N a aJ 4 -6 COCa"", a a) V_, CO v bA a _ OC CO +, ° ° C a v CD U " v aO v Y 6 v 0 Nv c ' o CC/ IP N 3 '3 v ° �., o a; o v ° ,�, o v co w E cm ,� E LL E C E v N a m o +� v 3 v C co a) a o o o E c ° •� C N U a) N 3 aa)) Q v v v, a 0 > O v O +, V i a E C N H H 0 H v, H ° — N Y ° t 0 N N 4_, i O N O L •N a) a) bA H N '+, fa E +' a1 V r6 U C C C a) ° ra U •• C o a1 i i) 0 r6 ° O O C i 0-0-os- 4- O O O O O O +, O O a v v L E , .�, C a) 0 -C U 4— -6 7 C 'i 0 -° v i C +� bA ra C U ca C C > C C C O = CO i C i 0 co L C 1- OD bAH co CO — +, (C3 > a D H (&) I• a, a •S CO a) o_ •0 C O O p a) N S sa L > • • • • • bA •+' N Cl) > a) t O. co a) U a1 a)> a at �O H .S O m J Q gd a3A SN - • - - L❑ r AHi:r a�0 ant,HL.c. ._ 8- , .r......0.-• �n C..._:A.._. - MACADAM AVE _ a EC C L J u -o c .•.t�.. fi)_rsiliiii = a O Cyly�,r Q C R •2, '5 '5 Q1 a u.I O O m ti • ..-J.. E i ,s,„eND x ,� g u J I W • T3 7. ,..cp I I art' o �9,11,,,,,,,,,,f,�T t w 0 RI 1 u 1 i a e�' 4z r �R�HP �t'S�q BLUc) 2 6 z �2 4 N.2o 0 F- a -cm a Q �r 4a H]SQC •� m N 0 s 0 a .� • y 3A'J.H ESE _ W ''`1",,',.,5,, .. i EL SOT `�\ CC ❑ yQ0 _ a a Z A�r�i • 1QI1¢b] �a•�5� KfgR�� .,J l,. . 3At'Ni SC j r " II O OZ,-y_,n1 �Zr o W 'V lJJ 1+✓k5 mr13 ....of,OA "y P p 's ra a C ca C Q n $1 c pps I v' m �.i y uI 0NNa L'monid 0 _=_ _ c. A� �- rn sd Nry�V7] /}• r y Y __ o r.,IHSVrn 3AJ-Hli9 „„�� b�' 3f,J'0N7r. a W N m W 01 v i Qi a ¢� x o c a a p �� ; app , as I 7 C C •� . C c O A. h C C F+ p p a, N a N z o m r 0.4 fa �" Ill U Lm•O m 4 G -Lu Q3 a7 ai 9 N °� o i ansa llY' �. y--_,, •W it 7 A4 i ` -0 W V J?+' ate.. ofel) n •t Qw 2 � ca, C D 2 _, a+ ar _ c[ t '�' Z �' N OJ m ¢ E m m tT z dm v c E_j9 m £ z 1- 1:1 I W = .. r .. a, E— _x co w ...t..7. 2 E _J, v� C 1C P' E o V O = -1 d W V ¢ mU w ki �� v7LD i d p = ram 01+o r/1,� cc a Q _ L C ar al ar a) C •N C C C rp s r, 0 ❑y cc --''. Q �` o ¢ _ 7 7 7 clJ 'n tll tlJ tl1 lJ.l C 7 •C of •%y o R7 �} ip C D co al ---------�'''� Hb H� — a— al aJ a1 aJ `- .0 a) C C C : y NE �'dlj P� -(474, §' a . 1- 0 � �o CL V a ¢ a ¢ 0 � a � ce + i ¢Eta = m g 42 216 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Q ' +, E U .- 0 = C C a) aA a) C L0 O (n (1) .(-) O a) a) a) a) LU C > co i -0 J C a) N O O +, COL +' �' 3 a) v O 2 a' c c N c .c >. vi = c v, a) C a) a) o O N o )▪ d ° U N (6 (a U = +' C OL O j 0 a > ( t a) U C (La L.() > (� to bA - a) Q ° C v ° I- -ac t d- a) = a `~ _ v v c N c CU '+� -0 C 3 +� � +' o p v c — +� t ° a, 0 O_ C a) o -- bp m L .(� CO '(6 vl '-' (a C U +' O co E a 0 m a) i 4-' L C ` - +•i +•' V1 0CU -CL W + 0 0 0 a) (a - — a) a) to H 4_, (a (tea J •L VI d U . C co (B ) a) b '- = Ca) L O Q U fa O o +' L m m ° Q a) a) C - 0 Vl U1 (n _c L0 an 4- O L ° • +, LO N a� 7 to u to m E n C •° + �C O - a) Q - CO +' a) f6 'a CU' -Co p O aJ O +, 0 .L Q L c U v, 3 L Y (a c C (' ° < v aci v ca +, p c ate a) 03 LE c -a -0 al N 0 V) a) GC U E c a c x L v c ,, Q a� C E v Q e -0 ,Ti, E t •c ° G7:3 C C1) elU o O O Ca) � cn w C 7 Z vi 'oa) E >' v ° > '— v • o o c 0 3 ra by 0 L +' -co GA Y •X -c C aA -0 V) r U d 0 c6 a) W Q L c C ii U a) •+,• ~ C C C 4— > a) C +' L I- (a O (a C (a a) aj C •C (a n3 ow VI cLa C E v E v ° ° c >- = 73 p N v L c Ci. p v L c o +� c :} 3 L (o c 0 +J b,a 7 v (v R. 0 • 4- (a 3 E (n a) 7, L = L a) m 0 C C U U •C +� o t 73 o -0 v co o ucn c Q 3 3 0 3 Q v v to +� +, c a) L +' C a) en L ID a -p 0 c ) 7 o -a LLI Q C X m N ° a) J j aJ C aA N 4-' CO a-+ C0 N E C 0 U Q- LLI v CD Q O E O 0 a) a/ CIA +_, Q - >" >_ :(75 C u CO W vi `n a) N 3 +�' to CO p H O 1 4-, O C C m E U 0 -6 U 03 a) +�' �O (C6 a) a) .E 0 C — 0 L a) ° +� }, (a v +� m C v +' U E C Z C `n x 'a CS V) 3 N 0 C a) — +' ' ' L 3 +' `) ' ' U ut U) cc a) a) C C u- C ?) +' 7 a) (La 7 0 C C C O +�+ CO a1 E +' -p to (v O C — C O L a) a1 a) Q C C C p i I- GLa O C i C co C 3 > co > •- >, +L' a) Q E co a) a co J a) 0 (a o O 0 r i +' (a p — Q vUi d.0 U i 7 L 7 GA +' ° Q E E U a Q a) a) C d d +' .. +�+ t L a) (a C +' C In C a) E aj > O L L vi L L s_ c ° n c) C O O +, L w 0 = C 4-' CI L 4--+ �-•+ al a) Ul (a L (a +� N U E p (a W +L' co C C aJ +� a' +' U ° H +' O a) C +� ate' C v a, '- X > Ce a) L a) C --- +' — U n3 Q L +' W ° (a C ° Q (a U Q cn -6 '� a) a) +' ce a) ,E C i h.0 N N > +' N C N = .0 L a) a U ▪ +' • W Q Q v a) v — a� v) co v v � +, CO (a a) - E a LL 0 Q o L v +' L Q) +- a) C L a1 +' +' 0 Q L .- (a C 0 W t v o C +� v Q c � v m (0 C a) 0 +� v, CU (7 2 ca E v 73 CC v L L a) a E 0 (3 a� - c c c L L v ° p C v o E a CO '- a) 'i bA C d C O p +' C -O a) a) C C 4J o to +,, a) .4- t E U a) +, • a) cn 0 p aA 3 +, E • • Q • L O i Cu0 u• c/') L a1 a) a) v C L 0 p -6 +' c C aA +' a) '0 a) 0 L QJ a) 0 +' L L +' +' o O m Ov 0 (ii of C 0 Q H N W a 4— N 0 C < I- C7 +' V) U CO 2H 217 a) o '� (La Vj co c Lb.0 v) C �_ a) bA Es c - _v c }; t — v 0 L V) L L ° O -0 Z O 0 C (6 (o O aJ bA -0 CO +., C U CO aJ a) +' •L O aJ p E 0 a) (o Q co X 0 L aJ V) Q L - C +' 2 m Q L Q w oo p 0 C O cu cu -a cu Q- O 0 +' E N Q U c-I a) Q O v `1 C > = v CD CU CU O fa _0 OL of L Cu co (a C (a C > Cl) L N m b0 Q N bCA •CUD L EC 'C aJ ° co0 4- - a) \ C 7 + C C 41 n C ° O v ° OJ ° 73 a) ro ° 73 CU 4- -0U U O 0 aJ O -' aJ C la +- C Cl) CA C a) a)u (6 Cl)V) p OL j, ° c v co o Ea) +' 3 U O L U U E >• Q 0 C C L >, D , +-' +L' C -I-U ._ 03 CU O 0 •`—' •vi c ° v a +�' o0 c „, �o co '7, $ bn E SO w c (° 'ra (° aJ L c ami a -0 •L a) c c 0 0 (° co _0 t -0 0 0 ca 0 U I (p rp LL _ +' a) L 5 L a +' aJ LJ +' Z 3 = In 0 V) -0 QJ 0 aJ +' co co a� N > E v C L v aJ L Ca i L V) o (J V) +' b0 C aJ -0 Q >.. 7 C aJ b0 (n •j I . c-I N .� C f6 4 O > v -0 aJ (a O L v Q c > >. Q c E O .,ra O aJ v O Q 0 •} N (o N Q C 0 O > _JD v) O aJ 41 aJ 3 aJ OL L U 0 O (a U O = O cu QJ v) (o111 0 aJ .0 v rr Q — U Q +>, +' O Q LF ra OA Q bA CC v +' O a) 0 C Vi +., N O .r73 ° of C +.� L aJ -0 U -C z L L E +' a) N a) a) `� a)co L - C to a-, >' C 0 0 L CU < °'° > co (^ +' aJ v) O +' t L v O - aJ CO U aa) C b1� •O p C CU C C to Q 7 v ° L aJ +' a) bA > U ' OC L aJ C aJ oo aJ a) +�-, (o -0 L N L E +' aJ > Cl) — t L (a p - +.' +' +-' C (o Q Cl) CO aJ 7 E c > O 0J -o aJ b0 2 0 ° + C +' U ' *E E Op C o RS p v - 4- p ° •° °� Q cu m +�' 0 c E aJ Cl) aJ -c (; ° E C° J L aa) aJ a 0 O o LJ +' S W 0 c E +' — a>J c �o OJ c o Cl) +�' > a E v aJ +�' Tu C c U 0 -a p — N C Vi -0 aJ N -0 0 aJ 4- C (a i C C > O aJ O C +' 2 O N [0 C L aJ 4J •C Cl) OU O i aJ )n O CD C +' +, t!i aJ +O, Vj -O U O L 0 O +' m on aJ O p a t C C 2 +' - LLI L X C 2! N O Q O U _v WO -p a) > 6 +- 7 C �_ +' O O Co — c Es c CD (a O N 0 —" C +' t ra +' n aJ E aJ Z O O +' +- Q +' O (B aJ 0 3 C v) N i aJ Q o C > +� `� C O CO J cu C w ca aJ b0 N v O L +, p +O + 0 aJ N ca 'a a' o_ 0 O 47, N N +' 0 ) CU O �>- '07) N OL ++-, , (C6 co d 4-C C •OU N _C - O C GJ 0 CD 73 C Q Q C � IJ > +L' 4 co +O, 3 Q C 0 }: a C O C - +' (a C 0 N _c +, L y L aJ a) L '} C 7 4 ' O U L Cl) ,} >. 0 C E E E t c (a t }, +' ca 4 aJ > > aJ 0 aJ +' (a +., a) 0) Zs (o -0 Cco o QJ -, 0 p Q >. H ,} O O 4- U bp y +' +� +' +' L E U L L 4J +' • C CO U (o C a) aJ Cl) L +-' Vf OA L L aJ C +' +' L L C () N o +' > L �, cu +_ LJ 0.0 p C OU C C + + cu ON = Q �o O O O N a) C TV n Q 'a L D d Q V) o .O 0 +' N vL 7 v '� L L CU 0 N > co C U (n — CC O < < +.' L d' L C a) aJ d d Q +., U p p > .0 N C co • CI) a) • • • O_' • • cu • }' 0- O E • • • W 'o + a) +-, c o E r 0- I- 0_ 0 1- m° m° Q ° CD 0 218 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RI PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DES6N REPORT < \ a) C / >< 2 •[ 2 / w L0 0 @ o 2 E u y H e _ / / / 730 5 m \ / .\ •E - .§ / ( D / cn= / / k / / = 3 2 # \ \ 2 2 / 2 C 2 e s o . • 2 2 f N. \ 2 o \ % e \ ± - - 0 } \ / c E o •5 / ) ° u / L. Cu \ 2 2 eta --- / » k / a k \ _ca.' / C \ / ) / U t " g \ 2 0 \ t E � j / coC E > , \ to o C I f E e o 0 o 2 E - > CD ) / a) 4- i4= e / e u -CC • +-, / ƒ / / (13& / \ CO 0_ •E , , , / c Q • c. y= 3.I,V HlC • w C LJ.-' tri co x ,,, 3W ONVg7 ..... _y • fI a V n S in UJ ^7 'f 3�M1y G,'J'"h� O U ❑ 1 ■ v a.ORTe W 71Y r . �' E in 0 mem v o �. p 4 t N •u ca Yto == CIC E 4 ++ ' ° 8 o C oRI IA i 6y v v @' — F a, �a pdj�^ 'p - `p Q � .c in Q 9 ;% _ of N -6 Q L �6 6� ' f P R 5 C 7 . Y6 r0 al Q t t drC ,}. O v Le` -'.. d Q C C in G C d d ..., - = a�a�` ■2 2 -, v1 O h.,,,,C � +' t,A','y,. ..q ..a L-, . N iJF-, r8p;z- a _c.3'� - '..1y CSE _ ® __—SSP-I :V • (.,,, ',Y''''N'D 9 \\\ ''d& i E o- ro x Qj C ..s 7 d} Z C 'L.' 0 CI- \ 13 Z Q 0 C= V N N C E x CD m 4- N 0 E U 1� N � 220 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Q v) +.) +� cco _ c o > c v c f° u E 4 CO t >, O Z c c 0 U E X �, a, co N 0 v L — ,v as oxi _a aa)) a LLI N c N 0 n a c > — a , N 0 v o v 7 Q w ° a co - 0 4- io •a, E c -0 i a) a1 vL 0 H a) ° 0 0 cu v E o +-, COm = Ln t w _c C a� } a) 0 ° '• > .0 o m " ' c p +� N — of aj= c� a o ° °J 4 C C +, a0 _ 3 c C o c c > (-4' C m " v v c c 03 a) a) °A c L C co aJ +, a) a1• a0 C = c6 i C E al .'' m C a) a) U > N a c N E E m 0 N o > v cu 3 v Q m v c a)a i �' c 0 c L! cn a) N +� +�.+ +�, C i aJ a1 Ln cn n3 ao a c o 'o n o ° c •E -, o o N ° c s cc OA •- a1 N C0:5 ~ U O l.0 vi OS a) C a) a c +� ▪ 0 > C c a! C O -a co O +, CO °L 'C 'a C - N .� '0 u o i Q a0 0 CC L cv a) _C a1 0 a0 c +� co " +' OOA ^ c 0 ao C v) N O > +., +., E C C o C O C a +, .N O a) c N `_ a1 •C 'c m N .I-, c c CO H +t, vL N C c L i a) L O O 0 > a1 N C Y o o •- " ?, c a, 3 a) CO c 3 co 73 ca c m y 4- a) 0 -a v c E t +, 4- c •an +, v a+.' c N ca CC +, v a, i v U co N Q • 3 to i o O O i6 c 3 E v ro a) C c CO R5 ; v CU c p o C c o U H v c �, m aco 0 a"i c +� 03 c`o v, • 3 c ° E c N 47, i..a m CO C) co c 0 L a) vNi i m i 73 to 0 a) a) 0 a1 O Ql E v� o c a v i0 f° 3 co ° °' 5 t ac, C 0 C0. o 4 p ra a1 i o c 0 o ca ca E c a) N o +, c cOA 4_ 4- 10 a; 0 co a0 >, C 0 a1 L U ° _ +-� C t C c L_^ c6 v v c c 75 U ,} co 0 } c �° v aai i a0 m Lc +- a1 a 4 4 0 .7 co v 7 0 0 �i a1 a1 C +� C u > C �+ + t 3 v cu 3 c O U a) Ln v C t 0 x > N o CO `0 co z _a .c E 4- H 3 Ln +' `^ — v a, c Ln o c � co +J c v' +' n3 U c a>i o N 0 0 _ as o 0 'E 0 t u c C H i aJ CO +', C 7 ' co C UA C .aO -E 2 v�j aJ > v �j C i C +� C to L C aJ U m co 4J Cca 0 c N a.., al CO E +�.+ a) aJ }' U D a0 U +, i U +O E •N N 4- ,- O O U C c Ql •- a1 -a c <TS i a1 a N C U O O +- L E c cu C C a1 7:5 CO 0 C 4 (4 — LP v aJ O U +, m a) 3 -O +' °U +,O > IA 0 c6 . i Li) >, i - C i co ,, -0 aJ +J > 25 co vt 7 _c aJ C a) a) CU •C ++ +-, Q L , co cO a) •- l— o3 0 C C 'a.., +., Z^ > —N _0 }' dA Q a) a1 C a1 O p L 4 H m +, a..+ c 1- 0 c C C _a "' O co 2 'a +� • a! +_' •` +� d oo LJ m N d- to ca -0 V) (-3 RS ON 0- " C Lri o cio `° C a) C of E a) C cv CO i i LO 0- a) }, 4-4 L aJ i ,} o +J a1 +p,, aJ O m O +J CD c c _ c G1 +� p O C C aJ Q O OC U N i — i Q + a) E c6 i O Es aJ co a) O• Ln -a c E E Q _o v c 0 0E c ° ac_o - _a ai c 0 > Eo o c`o Q Ln +ca, o aci C C - c—° 4_, a) •- v '� v c = cso E c U (N Q- 0 a) N m c c a LL -0 t 3 +-, C 0 c m co 0 +• E 0 0.0 m +� C On c C oC E CU i4= LC+� a, a, L 3 L -a a ca i c > , 0 -a C o o C m v > f0 a)C CU CU 0 c rn C ++ a) U O Q OC cc _ i O O O vL 0 +, • OL " cc ° > coo O0 a) a) 4 +, U) U r I ao v • v s_ 0 -0 m co — — c u +, > v C�1 o co -p .C -0 +-� a) c o v U a L L • S +-, ,▪ >` H aJ +., i >` U a) v) H '+, �", N L i O OD 0 Ln a) a) cu C +' c L C a) (0 +,., c c L aJ -0 c O C o a) c a) }' a) a) asC C t 0 v N N +' C to 0 > c O o + _c c +•, t cn 0 H _J U) a Ln m < co to v) CO > 0 cv z 3 0 U < H 4- < cn H 221 a U Co C ° v 0) X U p 0) co L > ° a) a) `� w L > > co 41 s tla C a +� a) > +-4 +,, a) C L Co Ina) = CU 0 O L a •� -0 ; m a) O m v) p v U L m ° c x coco O U 0 L CO L a) OU a) CJ b. = L L U 7 a) o a) C _0 0 " > O 'a .474 OA O a) +� CO m O CO D - C ° O ° C 7 7 < > a) v•+.+ >' ITS a 0 C 3 t U U co O p L O p C a) C O co bA O L 7 }L, CU a) +▪' Q C — i C m C n a 0 N ca O co — Q > o a) •*' C :° N ?� C COm O 41 (Lp a co O vs C N 7 U 0 C +, tn N LJ :�, in C N QJ a) ° CO .- E C N -0 (C6 o � o L L +' a) a) C) v 7 7 co +L-, = bA CO y m _ ut a VI C 0 L U +Z C c +� CU U n a1 a) 2l +� -O C a, c 0 t COU • 0 a) > C n U 0 cn E > +� } N �� L a) 0 ° C a) O0 U CO > in U U ° C CO 00 E = N a) L aJ C +' N Co Co C a) u1lID CO C = Co '_ O U >. C a.' +O, Co C co 00 a a O E O c to ca 4- + N 73 p0 O a)E _ Q C 00 O > N c a) co • s -OA 37:3 ..' O N 0 0- rn 001 2co cu ° Co = `-� cu cV Co > Co > W r' 7 a U +, (0 a) L _ C C C a! 2 CO 0 0 -0 a) 4-, •3 a a p a, a o MO LE v CJ 3 0 CC v o a) C C 3 c6 C a) 3 C +� U I -O C ° �>, N a) +� +-, a) U 0 C C C L Co Co C CU U Q m + a� L 3 3 C L f° v t > a; aA -El +� +' °)_ Coa co U a) C C a) a) +, ▪ a) ? E -0 U Q 3 a)21 Q v Q a c LE L _ - o c 0 U o v vi C 0 co o a) ,., C cn W m > c6 U C U L -� U Co a) U "0 ° C ° N CL.) }, O -rS 0) L L L Co C C a) C aj c a) +, a) N L C +' C ` C 0) •a,=, 3 y L U a co co L > a) S +, a) ° p co C co C Co C H `n �C ,C a-' •� +�' i O 4) 7 m 4- N j co -c, U a) U Co a) U a) co Q COL +(I n t E 3 -0 c N L U CN C ,_ CU v m 'w • m r-i -0 +-, co ca C a a C C a) vl C i v) co vLn Co Lr) co co a) v) v•`)i a) a) - m co 0 O C C O a) N > m E 40 a a) 41 aL' L +, a) L ut •O Co co a1a +J C +' a) m 1n 0 0 a) 3 0 C .}>—, U v N L +>—,, V C Eco of to co m cn CO —' m +• m +' bA a) C 0 co Co 2 a) O co 0 0 O U v a) C co coLN > Op > p > v N N •i c O U N a) p 4 Q +C., H co co a) L > N > H a) }' '+' +,co as c +, U C C c6 +.+ O C C 7 +.+ co i) _ L Ln 0 N O N N •� a) Q a cn H bA L L U L C lf•1 +, .0 L p L O Q a-' JD a=-' d +' E U _0 C C +O+ 0 co co a) 73 a) a2 +' U vOi YO L a) 0 co m 00 TO E m co U co 0 •� t 0 a) a0 N C QJ N a a) TD m CO �n m c E �n U a m v, o Q +, Q (o Q +� +, H c o is 1:2v O CO v o n3 = ,=., o co co • • • • •*—' OS • • •O • • • • .*' c O • • • • OA W "a t a 47) C 0 •E COte0 0 •C C Q H 0 I— Q a oC U U -0 D 222 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Q a) c (a c 0 vi 3 C 0 Q • O vs c `) � - CO E v U tin a +, c i 4- ca i a) O c Cctaio CM 0 o L a t > a a 3 to v ° o +, C 0 a CO c F- a) t U +-, = a)CS c . t-a c v) +-, a .- 4-,(1' +•Lv, E i co a) > • th 3 0 (a O a O Cl) O a U +' c a) -a ttO ?i c a) `- Cl) (a C C C U 'a a-, 4 Q1 t -0 (a +-' (a a) •i Cl) 0 cc Ms (a vs O dA +, o +' a) C >. - ' Cl)a) C a ( a C ca a -o +, `° ca 4— a L (a a) M co -a I:4 L suis O c > L a) QJ CO v, a) .> bA a 0 U a0 a C Cl) 7 v, ca E Cl) c a +, - Cl) > C +, -a c > a) C c O c C ( N CA (a C p 0 _ Q L +C �, Cl) 0U (a C (a of v, vs � (a (a �, a L -a 'N C qa 0- U 0 a) c6 L(1 N L +, 'i Cl) L .- 2 a) v v - in oco Cl)mu—� eco c a) ,, (a U (a O O ' .- .- c N > 'a> v i p N 'n (a CCS a ca +-+ = ca m > O (a C +a) N r-I ra y Cl) O a ro y = 3 C a) O a C 06 L +.+ i % 1 ha , _'-! .,,c7) _c C Ln L Cl) ," U a ` a a sr) a bA I . ca to C (a a 'm v N a a v < C +� 0 N a a v, c +, E 0 0 a vs +, O o '5 (a a a co -0 -0 v, c (- a u +- +vs a } o +' Q- caJ E v, Cl) a 0 2 L i •- C U (a (a C a Q 'a -0 co T.) 4-' in 3- CO (Cl U C Cr c in c Q .snL +, a (° }' - v a s a) a o L n •- + CO Cl) + o -0 s_ D co O a v " E o v o E (La N v o c c > v a) c 0 '+, a 0 • +, a +, +, - �i1 a +' Q- 'a dA U U U i N U to C O a L -6 +,, .,_• a .N C C a O E a i i L L (a U• a O c -a Q U ra v, ca a CM ca (a CO v> >, pp 2 L C E Q (a i c C R O N -a lH +, 7 C (a O +, Q O ( ca 7 Cl) s 0 a O •`' p 0 a CO Q •^ O CO C i +, -a c vs N c h�0 3 0 U > co U 0 C (a > U a (a 7 c (6 a ?� a a i a 2� U a a _c OA p -0 -0 a -0 > +, •L -Cs7 vs +, U U a U +, i U U +, C +, a U a +' U N C a a d' a a I . aai L m r 3 s_ oac cc C E ra a C cc cc QS m cc CU a) oac ° cc CU cc � CM c +, v, C • • • c • • • c • • • • • 0 o 0 " a v 3 v cc cc Exhibit A Figure3 ° ,�`� Y Q tr.H11•t,., Preferred Alternative: Hillsdale Steering Committee Vt,th'ONTST Recommendation Segment B: Outer Portland PORTLAND , f. FPS 13th - _ ... 19th 30th • aBarburTC • 53rd ., Light Rail Project 68th Currently assumed designs(subject to change) p — Single Preferred Alternative alignment Preferred Alternative with options Draft£15 alternative 1 design refinement I'•i PCC • On new or reconstructed structure Sylvania In underpass •.'.'J-:�'I::�•;�'.�, •fps-"✓ L A K Ef s� Station Baylor OSWEGO yf ■ t` P Park and ride N /2 mile - �"^' - 8124116 224 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT C co+ t +� a ° a0 a, L O a) +� +� c o cn s -� L `n o N To a) t c c 4 o °p a) s v = Q c �, _ +� 0 v ac CO +� W co• o m ao c C o 3 0 (o ° `° co a) � ,_ C co C c ai Oa) 0 N `) v') +J C a% .` ° +, N ° U -a ,n i a1 E N a) W -C a1 N +' N C -0 4 'i co +•, N (B s_ 11 3 C E a) v N 3 c o - a) -a a) 00 ,, ° a0 v , co C C t N , o to C > c O = dA (co 2 *' c% > +' cn ° c 2 C (o C +a a) >j (° X0...0 �b-A (o > Q _c *-' -0 a) 'in Y } N V C °O (6 N • a) a) L c t +' O L 3 L �- VI _ N +�, U o co +' a0 U 3 t 0 Q C " O� 3 m N ,., C C (o cc a) N c Q to +, a1 CO of C c N Q p Q 3 Q Zi,ro L L C i 7 dA i t a >� co +, L LL -,E, O }, a) a) L a) c E c O _ ,_ a) on E c.,-, ° to O act a 'O H U > > v O > .4� CO O a) (o C (o •° C a) C - a) a) pw C i > ho C +' i 0 C co Q > (o o c L c co +, 0p _c . i c Fs ' v, N nz +'00 = C b0 vi 00 +, (o O VI a) 70 C c -0 a) m O 7 _ 4' a) (v I/) L Q a) -0 (n �' >> 0 C 0 00 a) cn n3 -6 Q p +' V) c co =ll a) a) L C N -O (o N +' co ., 'i 7 72, ° o D> N c) c) 0 -0 0 C i i n C CO • O 7 CU C CO v D to ° 3 > O• _a 'O n3 rC -i-i o Q 0 c C 2 ao .4_, a) E N � o a) 3 .s_ o +(0 N 4 �' -0 c .+, '� c a) m i +, .� _F ro — > bCA (�" I� c '(io +� c O C 7 01 V) L ,_ 0 O C C O a) 3 >• •— dA J C c ll') p 0 CO co CNI L1 a) +-, v, C to 3 (o C GA .co 1 L L (o N — v) 0 C i a) 5-) +C' C v) N O co 0 co O _ H to p = CO I)rrs a) t '� +' Y _C cu -o U U (o i > Y v - N a) 2 bA . O = (o - > ca L •— p -a (o c 7 N O i +� cn C a O a) _ a) O }, c (o a) 4-' -0 ai v a, E C a) = c - O 0 L C � °C a) C E 'C L c a) N 0 co bcA U +-4 0- O a) > U U ° co 0 +, C a 'cr., a) C v (6 0 a)E (0 E a) O w m (o Y -0 +�, Q ,, O > C +L' V) n (o > n3 CO OCtz O cn E .O 7 'a (n +, N 'a 5 H p a co a) C o a) _ L 4, p -a O v ° E 0 L L L C (o -a •'i a) N v +' C at" 7 N I N p ut +, - 4S•, E C O +, +' N i C X < E H C N O O 110 W chi 7 > .� v E O o Q Q ap O v N a) H L .- +, c)') O �, v p W 0 +' o cu nz L U L!1 (D E Q c cn a) a) > a) , -o +, ` . n3 +' LJ C p C (co j 7, 0 1 � � a) c C C o n3 N 8N � � � (� � dA � � w (� � 7 � +� •� = o aJ a) C -a o N v O N +_0, (+o U CO a) c a) a0 m u a) p O bl33 (a (o E E < o (o (o _c ,., ao (o c v +' a) . > .i to J H (o c>i < 3 H C a) a) +, = bA +' U ,, +J C MO a) i U (v i C C N a � H 3 a) i a) -a c a) v c 2 0 a) C '+7, 6 - C +�-, C v U c +' = a) ( t 0 c -0 va) VI 0 C H +' a a) � c '^ C 4- O E Q ° () N c to 4-4 +° 0 L N C ar a) C < cc OC E p i a) O C (!) O C a) (o i i c^ co C (C (o '4744 7 (o 0 C CU Q E a) Q o t c.) a) tB 3 dA C c a a) (o C a) v -a u +, O , tau 'i bA Q) " ° a) +' +' -o E }, t — O Y > +' +' U cc) a) a) C (n — (0 E U a) • • • a " to C E O c (o c ^' v E Lin 0 p +� c to dA v) cn f6 a) c^ 'a 3 p c (o N to o c O p • v (0 a) c O v c vii O > H m ,i ° — +' L o v v o — +' v a, o C rz 3 (o a 3 H cn GA D i m u_ H oC , .E _0 u_ U .`, H N 225 Q C4- O 0 • U co C c -0 CU — +� C C a) C c a1 C C0.5 U0 L n3 t co O RI >, O > N (o +, 'O a) O +, > b_A 7 L 1- v) C) > (b _ W COv) C N U i— ON by +, (13 +, +�, co �_ Tp +-' C E a) c H L a) L O -a c a,c by +' by c ap c c C o 3 bA a) 0 vi a) cn _ L ( 73 v 3 - c 7 (�, a • n ap C o E c +' O U m C c CO C(0 C co 3 '+, o al al 5 CU _ a c +�, ca +O a) CO7:5 'a c +O, a O v, a) bo.0 a) a) - a) , c0 a) c E b�.0 O U n3 •C C0 CU U R5 _ +, O _0 s_ cpO a •c v v c v v v N t CO _ 00 1:5LE. C 7 (6 a) O SA +J a (o c01 = RS •> (p 0 +O 0 0 110 +-' p bA vi +, C — O c U U U _ c — aC) a)OC VI U 3 C C 2 L L a) 4- C a) a) O c -a a) c ( L +•+ a) by L LJ to cn O +, 41 (o coVU a +�, u1 c U - 0 L +' t > — +, •— a a a) N a ro N rn 0 +, p 3 -a +� c Q co — _ n3 c U 0 Q O c 0 +, _ — C Ln t u1 c U cl- 0 O v) O a) +' a) c a) 3 a) V N i U ! co c C a) %-i IP a) o 0 .E a N +o-+ — n3 t 3 Q o t p 3a) m n3 0 N CO }. 0 Y � cu co — c `) 3 3 + 2 - •c E by 0 a +J +' (Va v N +, ~ -Can 3 t c cn c •c N c L vs > c a Q c (6 +>, 'p L C c L O 3 U — bA V on U O 3 4-• 3 +�—, i a) = +, �n o o U c c a) - •c co v c RS U .c U aA L o n3 ((5 fibro 0 +� t 3 > a) -0 t j -0 c t E c c 7O 3 +_ a L U i) U 3 3 '+, U N n3 U N to to co N CO +_, •3 -0 -0 a) E v t 0 c o c c c c co c c +-' U o a) a) v L f6 n3 c o .— 3 -p o COLco m • CO 3 v c v v c - `� w ,� c ui a) as +� m +, bci0 Ln +, bcn 1° co o vi t V) L c p co a) -0 p o bn cc Q cn a) O a) O •N u -a �o ' +, cCU to +, a N a) (' +�, +O c +,O (o -O c6 c C c p C co co C _c 0> v D c •cb c -0 O by c 0 by O C (a IT U a) c a (6 i C C -p C cu 3 t a) C -2 C (6 _c +, , (o 4I , L U co (o •+� i > c Q c ,v 0 CU c n3 a Q (co ouo v ca v Q 3 3 '+- 3 vi a °A ap a) •L +, C o - (o +, E (o +, ,> J (6 (6 C aj C N W C C L 41 N 'a (o c c v) aJ N +, r-I Y M H bA u1 O �p O a (o +- C c (o ro O a) (% i—y c LJ f6 n3 U L („) () () bA U () bA U > l0 3 +O, O RI L +, C c O +, "C c (B c N c of (p ++ C 0 +, L aO, '� r6 1- +� p 0 0 L U0 +, N L a) > c i > +' > > > •,7 ._ > •� ._ (+o L a) a) C a) to so Q � i (Np m a a) TS to a '— co O c +L, (�6 +L+ v N Q 3 ai 0 O - C v) +"' a) by a) Q0- 'N N to L J too L a) L C L a) L a) + i O y_ co 1- CO 0 a a c 7 o •c +, 5 *E CU-w v +, o +, top a) a`oo 0 co o ,o o C o > o 4 w 2 co D co Q z N o < cn co < (n < < H o < H o c a) — c a, a = C CD 0 C .0 ° cc a • • • • • • • • • • • • nz o • • 13 CZ CU Q. v .+� L gm I— 0 I- < .� CC 0 226 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RI PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DES6N REPORT « 15 x w 2 a ( cu k 5 ) _ co + / > \ ƒ / \ \ \ % L \ ? C / m 2 tn: t• ° e MI •m 2 2 C m 2 § % a) r u \ / a) 5 § / 2 = 2 7 B \ ƒ E 6 R / % § y 2 Ca- $ / \ f § 7 / - = b 3 CO 3 •f s CO s .Cl:.; = c C _ _ & \ / / f ° co CO ) © } m g u # 2 \ u § e D \ \ ® G .- 5 } \ ° 0 L. § C ® $ s / / _ / 6 o ) \ 3 « co \ \ co / � 2 E E _ _ / G C © CO / \ t p (-) / / / \ ƒ E -`41 g •2 ° f R / _a 2 » E 5 v .[ 2 ® y E / t ® / / % / g \ taA \ .g / R •e t % a) 4 § = s •E § f a 0 0- / 2 \ / C / .E \ E 3 \ / { 2 \ \ / 2 0 -re f 2 f ® 2 2 7 / ƒ / > ƒ ƒ 0 ƒ ƒ \ / / . . , • co" . . a) • • a) • . / / ƒ J _ 0 t2 « (� 3 « ~ 6d®~ y \ - e = _2 , } - • . \ z W e /\ q , \ .. \ > g Pf % ', p % Cf ® _ 0 . . \ 02 . : , w w. . § _. .- . \ - - \ , 7.-- ,_-, : . , \ , \ ... 9 • > = Jc � . � y � 2• � ------ t _ • ƒ k -C \ ----7 E m �� . e ; � � 63 ma= \22 . �§2 ma, / ' �� }( \y �/ . \\ ` - : \ . & �� %. z _ . _ - -- ©eee «x, r \ > • < lk . : I } \ . k2 .. - / I , ^®®© • mew \ \/ ^ �- - ' - « ra me+ it — «=z - ® e 11 » e / \ e +d $ \\ '' { ) } \ % 7 - L 1 C~ - TO \ •a _.w E $ m . / ) & ] ) ® -\ ƒ ) C 7 u $ m ; / a E " al.0 Ez = 48. ^ \.\ %,co \ / ) / \ / \ E o . / O E .• • ± Z 3 / j D. \ 1- � W � % 12 \ . al it CI- VI CC � Ch) | �[ - 3 228 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RI PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DES6N REPORT « la § cc s 3 x = = 0 z w g \ \ ( \ / / j O J > j \ 2 \ \ i 2 ( 7 § - C \ /- \ .\ � . . . • ƒ 0 f o _ 0 o o ■ t .2 0 0 / VI \ \ \ \ c \ / E VI \ ' » £ 0 i 0 E % = E p } @ \ / { 2 � � ue iti \ p 0c E _ � y5 \ a � \ » CC / $ c 3 - 0 og C { � § / / D \ � e 0. = u . C \ c c \ @ = E , < 3 3 2 E 0 2 § e/ - 2 n E / \ u & o < = - CL c o c c t 2 � - _ < 2 3 O ƒ . \ _ / \ / a $ [ E § E \ \ \ / \ § C 13 /\ E / \ r EE \ ƒ 0 - a � \ a 0 e 2 0 - ( a { E o =2 \ r E c c w / ' / \ ,I- ƒ \ }Ts u \ ƒ / / / co / j \ / ƒ _ $ •, , . . . _ > g Ci / ) § , . . . . , . in eL G ■ _ > E Q 0 > M « § o c § 2 e - t u o ffY _ / 2 w Lli E I 3 \ c ■ o I— _ . - °-1 in .e E E o a 1-1 CO Z % a)• Q k / 'M 0 & / 2 a U a \ u I _1 4 ce TS\ CIA � �. . _ v ce Ill _/ L (7) _ \ e m p 2 Ce \ / \ / o \ CC o m VI u y z 0 N m /H . a 229 +, 0 -0 a) a) a) a) VI 15 vi c VIRS Q cu -0 4-, O C 4-'' -0 C _O Y .Wa1 4-, a) t O L C 0 L O 0 U > +, 4-, C CO + CO la VI +, Q Q n — •V Q .0 N a-, a) ut ate-, cr) ro L C >CU' a) ro C X C a) ° t 0 o +, Ero W c v, o a -, °i LI- c ro C a) to Q_ c a) U )c 4- o a o o Q- a) c a C }' 3 '- f0 0 ca �etc onO •i v > o I. C a) CO a-•+ 0 'X U ro C r0 a) N r0 0 a1 N i r0 +-' 'c5_ a) •i-, 0CI) 0 a-, -a 0 ° Q co r0 Q (0 N C a) C +J a) E O +, — a) a) �' roC ° eA v; °U ro on o o L_ ro 0 in a) U t co ry a) +�, L L L > to V) +, a) U 0 U = C C C U +, L C O in a) 0- O `~ C C C = 4-, 4-, O ? O +J CO �+ a) E N U �j O C O O _c O 4- +�-' O +ro O N in CL en 0 ' 'X (00 a) C +, v) a) +, -0 C C on C a) a) C r0 N ;,,� >. a1 L 0- -0 in -0 C a) CU�; • a) 0 ro +, a) ++ L a) 0 a) ro ° C +. O a) a) +�+ > C > f6 3 0 ° eon ro I. t }' +, a) a) C C C L Q. p C r0 OU �e_0 +� C 0 o Y a) ut •v U a) ++' v o a Na) = ro - rLa as +' +-' 0 *' • a) ro a) O �' o _Q N coL6 °vi > ut +, +, C C O C .0 ° H +, en o p -0 0 Q CU - a) a) C O E Cfl' a) a1 dA a) a) i C a) , C r6 U iin DD C L N tl° i QSD C ate, ° o CO r0 co �--� r6 • 0 C +, a) }i C 0 C c C +, C — Q �--� `- +C,, Q •v N C C a1 0_ a) r0 2 > O en ro v) r0 p r0 L p a) -0 Q ro C a) L E +, w E L O O C a., +, 06 - C 7 L 0 N (0 Om C) + VI CCo -C a) ao Q + `° s 'ro C c C a c 5- co Q i i v Y L C .z L a) C Cr) L U U UC CO 0 o a) U N ro Ea o Q o c >U L c_ Sao c 0 0 0 Q -0 " CO sr)C as = Q c_ +, U O V) a) E N .) a) `n y ut ep N — C op CU V L L t +� 0 0 UO •v) i UO O v) i 2 0 ro 0 0 +� v v C ro �, + C + a) (� L a) L L If "a ° v ++ eA t E 7 C a1 en 0 •(e Q -0 0 a) 4— 0_ r6 -0 Q 7 r0 r6 TS > O r0 H a) r0 0 +•' Q N C7:3 C +, U C `� aL., 0 en C CO eA C C fa ro a•, a� C C > _ c L a, a O 'N U O c (0 1) V) a, c E o f0 a) L p O v p ro • E +� O 'nH > O CO O L I a) CUU .0 aJ aJ ro 0 4- 0 E < on N a) p . p a) C 0 'E U r�i o c v c 0 •+' v; • N 4- _a • Q u_ 0 C -0 U C N U 0- ro 00 ++ r0 ro 0 ro t, 0 iF �..' U Q) 3 C Om +� U Q 0 c > c a + y a .E + c 0 •cwo a, a) +� N � 0 O 7 CU H +, L Q N Q N J N r6 a) 3 t0cts a) N 7 a) � C C -0 co Q r6 OU N N Y S ° U a) -w E > E Co 4-, C +O, cn +cu C a) C t0 Y73 i +�, 0 X I L a) C x +, ro +� � ro ro 1� C � 1= cc Y L ,, 0 ro 3 +� ro Q •E >° v ro v Q o E o m u •� o a 0 C 0 (0 ° x 0- E Qx- ° c O C C E > o •> o V) 0 ro a U C a U 4-• U U Q > a) H o w •� E -- a, Q a) a) Q a) C • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Q a) a1 —b.0 a) ha b.0 Q H Co ° 0 H (.01V) 230 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Q — C N .� ° a� (A" a) N N L yr a) I . c_ MS � -c O W U vi v N na - n3 C tW +, _ 'Cu V ro U N t c (3 U O i h0 O S — N N (a (a (a of (6 a) CO a) a) a) C C Q (a `� W co - > �, U U N as .O E 0 a) OA +•, > C (a C v 4-. . . Y 4-� p +, Q' t)0 I . a) _ v, U Q- > O i u E S O C N O a) C Q a) i 0 c C O L Q ro N c O C ((a } a) C .- +- O 0 a) a >` Q- to +, (L6 a) as a) (a h.0 C .0 a) >. C '+4 E C N aJ vs fa O a) U0 L - C CIA (a i a) u +-) p a)CU z m }>J I 'c O 'o i ro C N _� a) t 0 +� 0 > (a cc +, L C Q S U -0 0 L C C a) +.., i ° _c = _C U (6 L C a .- a) L +-i a) -0 N (o 0co (a Q vi tin a) v v - I. C CO a) E a0 ro 0 3 a) N c E • v v +p 0 Q E v, (a C > — v U v N ra E E ro p +, d0 •N +, -C L — C L n3 N 0 0 4- P2 0 ro N 4-, 4-' O +� 4-, v N 3 N UE (a N E CU LLJ O vi •V v O (Co N C -o N i L _ W GO a▪) la-.) O O (▪o (6 -0 = (a Q- +, -0 C C -0 a) O — •N C a) �' '+:+ L a) a) C '� p L f0 °U O (6 vi (a 0 E Q" VI CO a) Q U C E L a) ECL o N +� cCU Q ;_ �, c o +� +-' +, U vi ca c +, U C .0 +- p (a i +, p c 'N 0 C w v) (a a) -0 a) O a) ro 3 c O +� Q vi *' L U ca a) C C p (a Q +' a) 3 Q N a) C Q- vv (a) C a) Q cc +L, (a +, = — v U E U a ° 3 N u '� Ca o v v C Q c o v ao (o +, O O c O a) -0 U (B • 3 ca O Q- 4-) ,, v O i > v 7 .0 O .0 O `> 40 U o co -0y a) v Q _ ~ 0 a) , +n N p p v Q �[ O •- C C ( c0 a) coo (o U E i +J C ate, — U aN, c Y 4, bA — Y 0 O O 4- a) Q a) N + Q) C i -c C C i (a C a) +, `- -0 fa On a) 2 ,a) N a) +-, C a) co (a (a +, N V) U1 NJ 7' C C a0 ° E �_ E v h Q `" _ a) a, E +, -C C b0 (o N •- +, C L v� (a Q +, (aC 40 CO (a • N (6 a) a) of -0 U .- (n 0 vi -CH- +-, C •E 3 +, p -C `� C > V, 7 a) N L 4-, U C1.1 'L ▪ — 'a > C n (o a) C 0 +, 0 i U i O p 7 C E -w (a (o Q al .� (6 c-I a) U O •; N coC0 +, L CO .a 'L •C C C 0- > 0 = c >. >. N U E 0 0- +, p c N •L OA + Q 0 C Q ° (o (a v) L (o -O '} >� C `� 7 O '}, Q L }, a) 4! �, C N E of a) (a C > > 0 a) c (a +, (a d, O Q +' (o O O (a a) c vi p a Y (a ° a) w > p +, o O C 3 N aI i Q i s N a) +, N O v N i - 0 N L (a C C co ` a) L a) (a > O Q O +� N "a d0 a) U U `� i v a) Q 0 U a U peta 'a O p N 7 c a1 , C U (N Q. (a 0 -0 Q -p c U +, 0 d0 +, (6 (^ (6 C Q U aJ Y >, 0- C (n O C •+J +, (n N I v p V' a) n0 p 'a 4- u to _c o co c u (a ° U •ti a) 110 (6 a) co s L °U Q •+", +�, OU •C >. +, a) C +' C (a C vi a) Q (n 7 C C C (6 p U +, i (a C O 0 •C C (a _6 c CO� !a +, tn QJ • N N O C • C a) +, a) N _ Q1 fa (a Q) C •+, sr) a) Sai) C C O O C ,0 vj C 2 '+.., a) C +�.+ C C 4-' s-O C .� V V OU +i , cc I O O +, Q i (B +--, a) - aJ •y U 'i d0 C C +, +, C Q +, > D i (n i i i 0. +, (o (6 vi +�., U b.0 a) C — 0 -0 fa 'F p C C ) — +, _c C i i U C 0 a) a) a) a) 4-, 0 a) 0- vs _� s N to 3 O •ri 'i 'i Q. C 0 0 0 '- Q p0 0 (o (a ra +, L > > > h N O a) a) (a a) U L a - 2 U U U 0 = U Q Q i N C H 0 0 0 i ( ,L a U a > -0 m I- -0 C .ZE c ▪,CU L > ,. —b. °/ C C E 0 0 a (a D (a 231 a o -, � � � Lcn a) 3 N cc ro O c c bCA +� O 3 L L O C a-, ` a-, — N U V) I- co 'a -C 'N —_ C X v N h�0 v - aa, a) • = t s.0 p .v) -O s C C W 0 a) c a) co (n E > U 72 U a-, ra +, co v f6 V) (13 .+7' C C ro C i +' 4- LO p 00 O N 1- _C2 _ +� U c v N 40 ° a C 0 ro p O LO •v-- — +, ro - C c i 'p 'p bLO o Q 'U ro a) a) C C . ° C 3 L • 4" CO (o Q O O NO c ro C a-, Li co U CU Q ro ro +' 0 , . L - 'r6 C s- -O ° co N a) .- >. a) C ro +, ro c N +, to a) > Z s to L .- _c ,4 O N N ro N ro a-, C •i N +' E N L 7 a) a) U N N i d' 40 0 O a) o c C u E a a) � a° m C a -D V) a z c E 0 +' c .E > C C ro O (o a E .P u a) E tz E cu a) c a) - vi ro 4 U Q +' C 0 ro +, v L W a, a) U Q Co .L fp Q) •c s_ ro N a) cc co U >` O c C v U E is N v -0 o_ v E as +' t > E a) ra O Q •c N c tl� ro ii evo 5 • a) .g (n Y +' 4-, b.° L `� ° o en t >. 4— (a a L n 40 N }, a) = a) 4- O c t (o r6 U 3 a) '(o N 41 N N O 40 +, o() Q : •+� 1- 4-, C > ,� — c v N Co o co C o f L a) •c E Y to = a) (o L E s L LD CO N (o U N +� Na) aJ = Q N 8 ro I E N C L C V) ° LO off m v �O v O a) E ro c a) •5 '— O U ) ro7:3 U _ L co ro N 1N CO -C dA 0 f6 CO N c rp +-, 0 i ai C (o co CC ro 0 E p O v N v as d' O 4-, t O O '- i v v) O co in +' +_, N - +,) ,_ 7 cL a) b0 Y -, a) c N a) a-, Q C- C >- p L O i a) p 0 O N • E t ro >. N N -CS ro N O L U fo +�-' o E a-, a) C O CD > a) a) C t O U > ° C c a) C• — +a y (o co co N N ,� v '(o U ° N O a) U a) U N — U >> a) a) f6 c '^ L h.0 Q 41 +, 0 L _ 4- >, N �+ a) ro O CO +, N w m 3 cLo O U . . N .. U > (o C C CO +, -p co L +-, _ C co > >. as a.., as C co -0 L co a 7 7 U L L U C a, N Q E v N laoC > a u Q a) LE +' `0 U) ra 7,b. a) a) ° O a) 3 > •- v wv ° a N ro ro o f6 E +' a°o an c_° -0 a -m C _ a) m ,_ C +J N a•., p hA IP C N _ 'N r6 CD C (6 N ro C C = r6 N •- 40 ; •� p to N co To to _ L ' +, to E +, }, -C a a) N a) a) 3 c U O c o (o• C N — O a) hp 'c .+' N ro 0 _U �al ° ro E v _ 3 c o c p 00 C- L L ro N ° O w C f6 +-. ro O ro (° C O O I E O N +, +• � aL, S E L ° E vi > c v ° a -p +�, N O a) O N ( '- >, > +v, o Nn ✓ v 'O O, O E �' Q C (1) •CD +, TS OU vn 6 C a) v L u _c Q aJ L a) L r6 a) +, (4 O N CO ° N C 3 0 +, L a) U +-, O L co _a E O C L N v +N, Q Z }, .E < co 0 0 v) V) L - co • v) E • • • • C ro '5 a) i O O a) H U +-, 'aS O • a 0- _ 0 m /./'� 0 i W c� r .........,3,-06�`+l `� a. -1--) --311V 119•., . "F.tLC`-: - - -❑ +.3 L•H1W••w i•••.::i N t �... C o W ++ • fB 3 a ® G I` C rp • a D. ▪ OO VL�� CS n J J V] b 'd1-.1I W d 1 w ! i S r cc .J \ C -- Q a S +L O ; + s� C• fim yL _a 0 t �O-( ...,71 ,...5 4-. a r6 a U i 2 ]t,n1Sh ❑ 1 N °d.y, Y 0 � m' p 1 - i '�llrys. U I O ¢ mow+ 4— I NCIi i H u 1' M + t v �- ---•'- .,_i----' t+Cli9NlrISV+N 1._,- -- - - - -- iip -- - Z-- -�- Pp al 13 LT) 0 .or' '' .gym WI t caob t u Ji LP 0 • z w q ,.- hlurdi co 0 0 @,, Z . a Q Q N ~ LIQ p jai,,,:: 121 yH ca s m 1 41Z 233 ow Z o a D J J I— U CC Z 0 J CL J O I- oz a) O O a) - a) D � Ja U Q a, w o D � °o c`a0 (a - w F To -u ° ° a, � amiall _ � y LU m � m w ok C)) -o- — U)) � ? 234 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT a)73 1 cn c �- (n co a) C C U N — E u) a) (a oO O (v O cn (Q is # O cn N (B 0 cn 0) N C O "O O a) o_ c co c -. fn «� +� U O C 5 O0- CO � +' C C X � — C L -0 O (6 U >O a) `� � � 0)-0 Q „ -3- 03 C (B i N E C a O O C > > U C Q N C /�� y-. co O (n -0 n �-. L L C (o L +. C O E y) n E > (n (6 o - L.L co a) a) O O (B u)c co C U -L' - '5 C t- D_ P yL+ U y-'• a) X a) cn c6 a) a� O _C D •• CO CO O a) /a)) _0-} a� ow c� c > o L O O u) L ,-y Cl) ,- D C >, (B U C a) >4) O Q Q E O (B a) Q 0) TD a) U a) Q > C (n o lE 1- -0 a) Q- 42 I- Eo (o mai oc Ca) > � �� ° E moo ' � o `- }. C O O C U OU O C c E OE 2 > > a) C L U Q _ -0 L t' C C m U C O (� O L ~ Q ( Q C O ... (o op Q u) a) V) �' Cl) , i * a) t- U ca "m .C O O (n > p 1 cn a) C a) C > Cl)a) (o D a) Cl) (o C L a) -e o C U) 00 C Ca) U o a) C (3 �' cn U Q D ia) U y-' O O -0 O i O � U(13 LA E a U � � = C3 co � /�0 Cl) > c `- CO 0 0 (n art•+ a) oM c o L >11— E +_ C a) (o a) o E O u) Q ° C C c6 0 o c) QLC (oo0_ U >. H ,, ECUs }' a) aE -0EU COu) CO U c U 073 O o � 0 0322a3 tea? 2 � , La u3 co o - o o >, EQ " •EcDoun ( cn `5 > � -a oC :� � CO0_ .L5a) 0c -c 2 - -0 a) 2 � t- � ° 2ccTo (� al °, � � .O. U o cn a) a) U N a) E .s 1_ C Q.- -c a) L.L L (0 Q O • O O E L u) a) E ° C -C co -•-• _0 o 35 O - ” u, a) a) AEU c (o - . Q o 0 N N .0 a) • C6 O uO C 'C 0 C • 42 LO () •§ -- E oO co 1- 0 : a30 -r) 0 '.= o U (0 U U () Q u) a) OE C O o o (B N cn E >' a) . J C C .- a) + �' >, U U O (� _ a) p .0 H Q L (v m -0 a) O H O (6 O a) H U _0 'p N cL6 C O U 2 01-(j) m C O C6 (Oj) O (B V) '� a) O Q (B a) O +-. _ c L (n (B Cl) i Cl i a) "' "' 13 _ O c .. . a) c c _o co (n Q- (n - H - a a) L m H V o a) u)ci a) OE '(n C o > N co .- co co E m C N D O N 0 a) Et = •c O c () O N y_ O) 0 a) (o () j "- c Q a) (6 c J (o J •., • o -cU � cam' cn c (n ° Q5 U) � � E tow — a) --- : 0 E >,� - o m a) E o U = m e u) o C cc c c (o c •— o E ca m �� . U o _0 a) C a) C a) a) Q �, a) c .Q Q.0 D > C L (a P a) >+ N >, c -E' 01- °L C O c O H co O _Ea) a) > —, (o 0 4) O c (B (o L O _U O 'c O0- Q C H . OE (B (o cn a) O '-' c u) N 15 CD m °-TD- 0- o U .(7) -a o o c co ,C)-CK § o > 2 E a3 m " ,, cn m o (ca a) -0, o o (Co -0 U �O 73 c C C --5' C U ( O c a$ a- O a) co 'a) -0 C a) ° 0- O> a) OL Qu) W -• cn Q a) aa)) O c L_ N cac a) cn o o o c ca o O Q m ° .L o .� •�_ Q Q `co' c cn o Q c� o c� c 2 = m Q m co ~ L d c , N (D Q C Q a) co O1'V OL C C6 u) y-. L ,- a) cn N U p c�-n O O ,_ (, O_ 7; eL E L O U > rt.., (6 cn 'C O u) c �' C co C 0 a) u) (o a) C u) a) > a a) 'cn c >>O 0 a) E Q - -c i > C >> -' Q o C eh 2 a) C U a) >, 0 0 a) L"' C a) -t -0 C a C C a) -2 (0 > a) �' L O o ca ' (0 o > O L c6 (00E .-7 U C O 0-co O 7-5 ° = a) .- H p CO H p m m a) -0 C H O i . LL 0-- cn ` Q U Q U .o a) C Q U H H U .� 'cn O E LL Q C 235 U) _a -0 >., 0 Ca ~ >, U c a) Q 0 a) ° a c L ca - O a) J C a)CD C a) 0 U — — J C _c N E _a) TI:ica ca p U �_ ca >'(n T >, E al > > — > > c C m L "O CO ,_ a) - .� p O CD _° a C p p c U a) .� co i co N L >, L 0 LijL (a a) U) a) C O a) E LL C a) ° - •- co L L - L p C >, U) ° C a) 7 - O `� a) a Co E a a) a) N a C j O a) L ` oc5 p a) O - C E , O) > C , OL E 7 mE a) 'C O OC U -c .E 75 Q C O U C0 N —; C D N j ,_ (7...) `~ OU C O1 O a) a) c p C Cap co U , c a) , CO - ):' o co p D a (a p _ N a) .- C ' a O Y Q-•U C O `� O C Q- CO +. C i L L O N ° L C cn •C +' ) C N a) .0 C CO O rt, ca (D -00_ ca a u) a) -0 a) "-' a 4 � 0 O v) O a) N D -0 O .0 E J 6 Q Cl) +� -2 a U) Co O •� ) Co .� +� U) 0 cn C n 0 C C O O O p O L O ca O a) a) L L (a p C O _c U V) U) > Ca a) C a .- U "- a) `� (� "' CoL U) C -0 C >1-p co L }' 4- a Co a) c E •_ U) y+ U C _ a) NOUa) -a2U) 0) C a) 4- oa) U � 7 aot `acLa) � � = � caOca ° }' U •o V) C �_ U U a C L �- a C Co a) -0 U) a) L L a) O L a) co .O C U a) O L -0 U a O a) Ca L `F U) > .L • �_ -0 U) � � oc , � — 02° moo � � � EE 0_÷E' °) � � Eo� Ea� c ° } oma c 2aa)i .,, a) C .c -0 SOU = U°) C00 a) aa) � a� � � m � � 'con o � � QE � � C a a) c C O CO a) o a) a° a) c o t 0).n a) o p ° m co (13 a) •� , 2.c m Q. c _c a = u •E c •- a) N c .L c > 0) CO ._U U • V U 'O U ca a c N j Co E cC6 — °c cn C C Q >' 73 C , CO ° iz U To= ca L (A U) ca .7 O C + 73 ca co E .- (1) = .(7) 1/4v —_ _C L - O U LJJ O O a U C (n ca a) Q" L U U a) U J U 4O .O = a) ca C LL (a +� U) C O L Q co co U) }' a) (� > N ° c O ° O 4) L C O U a) >, O a 0O a) ° a > C cn Co Q CL CO L a O co u) L ,- O L '§ u) o L E u) a) -- O Co O -O t 4 c C O E C I a) -1-1- ° E a) o V 0 c _0 a) a ° co 0 � N �. co a) U a(f) .- U c a) a ° M a _ ca a) ` '' N - c L a) .� U) U ~ U ° O C O o _c a) o C (a " 7300_< U a) L0 O a) a-0 C C) o U ••E c ca - >,j � � O U, +- a) � E c O 0505 X � -0 c� }, >. oma, L (n c I M E U, , ° u) oo a) O _ ca L QC C U) O O > c a) E ° 2 C a) a c , •U O c cu E •"= a) a CO .N a) z O U) 4] U O U > a) c O (n L `� OU a) O to C U N -' -. c) _c L > 2, o N U CO C -p C O U 'a OL coO U) ca C a) Ca a) v O C p Co C a) Ca D ca U U a H •X �O 1 C D „s> c U ° Q a) N - c c 0 )U a a) Q73 E C a a5 m .E Q a 5 cn ' o O la N fI ca a) ° ° O a L E ca C -0 O U C E a L ti N 4- ,H C a > C E C a > O "_' C C O O C •L ca C . .5 >'0_° Q O O 0 O a) U c O p L a J E cA O -O O E C U O a) (a U) E O a) a) coCO UC E U C6 C O +a a C a) o 0 — O C O O _c 7 0 "� a) m ° E > CLi- N >, c `~ O E a) p 4- L C ou) C a) "- C C ° U L 0- U) Ca a) a) +- L -0 L a) a) o u) a) 0 ifU a OECD Ca C a) _ C O Ca C 0 C L _c C o O O O rz .,+ _0 OU 0 �+ N U L a) -tU 72 a) p O a) .O Co O -2 a) s a-% •C O � s2 � c) c°) m � � 2ELa) E Co - � (� '5 � �acEc) _cc ° o � c � � U � 52Oc � 0I_ aa)i 2 A o C L U D al) � = .- n E '° � H CCC 0 c > o coLD a c:'- >, O > � '4- O p U O -c u0) O a) 0 - F- c0 a 0u- ?j 03 — CL — �, il co ( 1- -a Co — a) UHLL 0 U) — LCL0 a a) U) -0 UH U) ap U) a) -c a) Co O CD 4- t� Ca U 7 a) 4_ a) L ca 236 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT U) C L a) (a U) >, ca C -2 O) 4- C - a) a) - a) C O O (a O O 0 O O O - ' ° C c o C p U' O = ' L N a -U C ) p 0p C - ._ (a -OLE - = U � > _ > c C C U � E >,•— +-. L a) O U L (a 2 (a > p 4) :� +) > U c _p a) >+ C O }' L (n a) O .-• O m '> N O o -• 13 p • C U o 4 pa) U > U 0) c >; o C C a 4-0 (� (n O C O) C L a) E - O ( O) 0 CI o = N Oa Q (B CO U C C c o E o p O < > O U .--� U C O O O U (a (a C O L a) .— L U o E C a) U a o ca E a) L N--. L L U ° O E ---. L-- O a) (V U U yC� C O O co O U mi Q C O U • ( as B >, 0 > O U j C c U O 4 � (a E E O L L o a a) 0 C C O (La L '— ° o � _ .— ( ° ° U Clcn m a) O 0) p 0 a H U O = • O a) ca U O co p C _ CO E y�▪ L C U C o � a) `� a) — ) 7 EE � Ho � ° oC � - EooE o a) ° oo L E a m U4- C CD4 (a Eco a) ° 7 — U � O 2a (n p Eal To CS H >_ - O ca O N o- - 0 0 ao U m il C U C • 0oc1 .a' 0) 0) cus80 , -° o( cz ca C �-0- a)• � ca Eo La) LL = a (B C + > ca , (T3 EEoUNaU0 O opU U -C -pC EO . L OC02 aC � O 28U � ( � caC ) Nua) (0a) Cu) � a) caUCa) CUaCnO } i pC 'Ea) UUE C (a .0) _coE _cUUn —4 •- ;i U ._ ca0 � UU . 4— oa �M �oE — a) -c oc op C (n tez � � , E c4) > UC E ca U- aQ " 30rz a) omC) - U 1) -c CU c "O o / 0aoU U U o O> 4— � � Qmoo 0 0 Uco0o — ) 0 C �° •C2 ) 2oU CU � 2c �> a) oO ( • Emao a(I) Eoo (n • oC UCU >,-0 - C D CO • -o (a `- _0 -0 f (Y a--' - C -o 0 0 >, N Cn L L C 0 "0 N C 0 o O C -0 a) fl a >, (a cu CO U a) -0 C 0 0J o , cu o a) o ca (a E ca O 0) (a U ca C U - -c (a u O J U U •_U 0 - .O u) a) -0 E C u_i C a) i • C U (a — o E �. U j a) p Q t U H C p (a O O O U C 2 L O O U O "O L C C ° C >, -0 .',53 a o U J C a J C U) a) U p CL aa � L �_ n c co __ o a - � Eo a3 o U O fY a) a) — o � OJ > � C ca •L E o � xa`n) '5vi = o °aE (n ° O _ Oa) aCio � H � a) Q2gJc � c2oQa'Qu, -. 2aa�i • J C =' p E U E = N ' a O C .m.c 2 2_ a5 sD U Cr L .0 O O a) "->' U -o "->' a) Q2 a) C.) 00 .500 ca m o ~, U o a cS— TD .� 2 ( > , � a-i _c— �� U70U .E CDU a) ' a� a) �--. L . L . C 0 - -0W -Ow (n '-70 = c,UO U -0 E 72 .O 0 a) o C > a) P ca > H- o H E o co p o 0a '55 L- H a o_o H U u°) cin U < (ten v) 0_< CO 0- U 0_H a_ o (n> H _a a_a a •.7 a F 5 C O L O a) O O U a.-. -. .-. _. �-. 'E (a a) -c L a) C X a o C N- H ca 0 a) 0) 237 ,_, L L L cp c U In Q m O co O C (0 Q) 0 u) 0 _U ) U o - — ° O - ° -0 c �j U 0 ) U U ,_ • U >, + -c L CD C) C6 0 C COO L L -0 n . CO — OQ EO > 0 co O u UO C a o C .0 N (i) O , O o - a) E a) O c 1 Q 0 EO LL U ? o asE U L C O > E C C O N N `_ C C cz U EY U 'C C u) O L U ° (!) O N ) f Ute' U co — O — .— O J ,� COL O U U L U U c O O O U (o a) O C6 U O O L E 1 U D CO • Q oCoc EU ° CQ� U o2 Q 0 = oO � � E 0E 0c iii � o o � u�io > ° � I o IE g >, aia� ° �' a) L (B L p a) ° Q C6 c c +� += a) L Cl) "'' c6 C L O ,L— -t OL O > U 6 v) � (o U E a) J 0 c = _.— "'' U O C C) co — > p C/) —c-co E -- > C L a) U U y--' -o a) L n >> O O Q C) a) 2 0 O Q-+-, O Co a) a) L a) , U L U U •cn L A U C E >, E 7 L U O O �• U Cl) C U E Cl) U • } ,� � � � .o Cl)� � � � OQ � � � � co Cl)O � � EOE E -0 CO E ° a3 ,. U C N a) N U U U a) �, Q- O �- a) _c O L 0 0 > c) L O O O E 0 -c co D U L a) co co U co OL > U C/) , - U a) > ° >, E co I '� \ O -C " ° a) 0) U — a) Qo 0 ac •c) co 0 -2 _o U _ >, °CZ CD o a) U -i-' a) U .c C a) co c �_ co a) U � = c U a) O O cn 4— co W U co O C U) C U U - 2 ,_ a)C U — co -C Q C) u) _ a) >' CO C -0 � 0 E .Q i11 L > c a) •c O O U C a) -o O)TCC U_ Q O a) 0 2 O () o) 2 : a) •(B 0 CO L Ti)i) E Co _� 0 V 1E U C O +) C c co 'o 0 � U � � TD- c..._ __co o °o co - 0) as o o co L VJ L C E 2 I ° sz E a) ai o a) L c •c E /�/� o c Co o m ° �' m 0 U .X .X a) > U f C) N U a) U U O (B C ^ L .� E U a) O L CD O c a) �[) a) cn c �. c ,� a) C a) (� co — 0) O - 0 co E N a) D O Q' +' > TO O OU ,� p U 0 C 0 _U — 4) °O C •E Q Cp -2 Q C E) .- w _c '_C O -0 p a) U O (o p CO U U O c vi O ZCI) .O C C6 c a) C O D C U § .� C m _c O c 1E 22 C U (o a) L C)0 C 5O Q-c 0) a) E , cB N m y U ° O E O C (o C L L U 0 E ( c L Cl) o '> 2 cC6 �, Cl) o = .cn C6 p 2 a) co c O Q co U >1 c 7 7- C) E VJ ttn o � (o � :as(f) C6OJCOC0NLco > p � UcO .� .OC L � a) � _ � 7:5U C E C >, U � U 0 C6 >,o � a� � o � oQQ � a�i m � � cno � UE � ° a) � Eoc � coo � � o � c °) Oa) V O _ U Li) "_ (� co La) 'cn co a) •� ° >a) co - a) L O U : 0- ° i 0 C Co c c U -coC L O O C C C U U (� L U C : cow 0 ° a) co O C C C) p P L C) c > Q Q•U c `� .0 C a) U "= _CD co c 0)O .L OU L U co — +' Q _c 73 U O O c co C U - C O EO L " ° •C 4' U O O C " ' a) .—� a) - L - •co y.., C U a) U C) U C L p co) E co (-7; 03 (z .— .Et .— -c(o = C U O a) ° Q U U U cb U •U U a) a) D O c � O >, a� DC) E- ° .c � co — > 1UEc9 Eocnuno � -0 Q �omocco C U L U .U L O a) _c r Cc) �_c/� COCOL L co a) O i_ _ 'O a) L 1- 0 _c N a) X U L U O O C6 U c 5mC!) p0_ CnJJm LV) G Q > J .. HI -0H U C H U U a) L- ~ L 0-u) a) mU- UU UU o �ct � ° E ° Co Co � cd co ,' co o U -o � � � —o oH � �' � coo U 238 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT C 24) a) a) u) a) , a) a) U 'C a) p °J > Y = J a Eo u) Oc ° a) .— U) - He u) cn Q a) Co > C) C O 0 a) - U "p V) u) +- u) o0 cK co as -0 -0 +, u) L � 2 > w - 0 ._ � 0 CI) c 2wo0Cp J � 'p ° o >> a) C O O a) 0 N a) • O cn c6 O E C O U) E s O + O OM > (a E co O cB C C) Qaa � •c C c U O U -Q a)cf) co c t rac al C) L O > +- C c U OU C6 C) C a) -c Et - 1E 2 O 0 co Q C 112 uj U O (n cv +� C C to O Q >, a) a) V) U cn O a) cn C a) a) > C •cn C) C) C N D CB C) +- Q O _U C > 0 CI- CD 0) a) 0 a) C 0) Ca CD c 2 i +L. L c4 a) Q C) Q C a) L (B a) .� C -c- U -o C c •-4) C O o O u) a) O i O C ° C) D O +- a) • _c 12 C) u) _C C a) — ° CO _c _ U CCA a) m C 0 L 0 C +- (6 CD N U . L C U 0 c ,_ D N ° • o N CD E N O c ) N -c ---• 0� ac) = ° oco � .� �-c cow > = J � � -~ +- Co = N .0 p U) }' c Cl E +- -c -0 }' C a) 0 - O a) (Qj .§ "5 7 O •� —' ° � m L- > o- u' 2 � v ° m ° E U "5 .to Nom' u) L -p C O >+U N -0 C) a) 4) > C) N X V +-. 0) eL C co C . CB N O CC3 U M C• ,' > co O U C ._ Q i Q O L Q.> cn ca O > a) C O U '•O C i_ p C +- p U (6 C) O (B OL c) m C 4— a) co L _o C a) - E c C6 0 U Is= CO O U O — Q O (6 C C) U CO Cl) C +- C C +L_, a) CO O O N C W �o 4) cr5 c :1 O a) "'' a) = cB +- a) c O _ LL OL CO co C U) O O a) >' CB �' Q" co (n Q C a) C a) a) -0 5 92 Ha C O c CD t o - E a) ' C) N cn Q ,� _ O p C L H N a-' C U p u) ° - O C C a) C0) co E C co O > i) C6 C 0 3 8 2 V) -6 a) j CB : C C C fI Q c0 2 c m p p C co co a) Q C U co o o CB a) V U p . CO }' > C6 U ca N % CB >+O O O N Q U) co -6 E U U a) °U 15 O- CO 0 0 co co (� 0 CB C CB _O a) O "-' C -0 m -- Q~ a) O C) '- 2_ C C a) OL a) U O , (7) _ 0 -0_ c +' -2c ca 2 CB c m ° O 0 c) E o •> ° E fI L Q >, 0) O > 1 O Q+- ' CD ° _ i L cB ° m C co m C) >, E .—a) a) > m C O -p (B L Cl) (B - a) C) C a) U O E O Q c6 Q O j C6 o_ 'a-) C ca CO L p �- U +- L a � � ° � � +- E Q cn L cep U ° c -0 > c p H +- (C) o O p E U C) p c o C6 . �CO0 c u) ° —C —C O . .Q ° }' � _ p +- C (SLI) >, (1) oV C C CBS +. Oma- . V D o L p •o) Q C C a) J O o C r_- a) Lf� > o i +- C O - p U C) C 6 m , H O gyp+ (B O N m .m 0 U N - V) 0 p a C C 13 CB - .-- co - O C '- C O -0 C i O L � CCS C L cn cc Q >m L Q -- _, C 00 p .- p C .cn a) a) (n C Q ccu Q C) cuc > u) cn a) U 4? Cct3 c o —' •— - > L C) C p O E U C) c6 C _ }' O -- C ,-,•• .... O O 4- H _c Y ° Q U O . a (n •- _Q cB 1- c) U c6 76 N W O 2 O ,- C > j � C) CO c Q U) CO IL' " ' cr) Y E a CD +- u) _c m C uj ° a) p O 0 U 2 c6 2 E U a) Q c C'7 0 C) J C Q p C)0 +' "5 fn 2 c i C0)`� O Cts LL O a) a) '' fn L Q c ,— c L_Ca CD a) o E -C OL L E � O c _C c6 C) C) > 0 >, a) • C a) U a) .2 _ U COH ._ CtsQ COmCO °U I— 0_I— CB2 co — (n p).- LU U OU ca o p) OQ , ,= ._ cn U U N— I— v -0 NHeL CO _CD .- Q4O— c C ' J CO 239 ' U O O (o a) D ,C a) O L a) .� X U L `1 C O O C6 — U C (o Q�; "� CO U a) U) O — O U U 4) ?� O co •O U o cn E U) c c L O > co 0- ' c O < c O O a) p c O ' D O c C cn .5,,� O 0 m a-. D C — C Q =� O E - ' O C Q L u) 2 0 0 0 `— c U >, L o -C W E .(2v cn Q m m L m >' -o E D C •L a) U •- C O `- E (o C Q- C C o E a) a) L a) C N a) _c .O O 2 E Q co a) p a) (o CO (o L (o 8 Co c OL a) co _p O co C OU L a) 'V u UCD cn N J . m Q �'_ 0_ -° � c Q� °o m c a' E � cow � 2 a) o . C i, f i - Co ,,. 0 .. . u)E U % O E c O O a) - U -1--, > Q C U (n O Q O C 2 c C p •p a) "— O -p0 E Q O O C a) O • a) cB L > j o -c a) �. O C o E U O _O U N •c (13 p Q O O .O a) C 173 •� O o) 0 .0 Q E cn O a) p E co o ff To -5 � � � a) E woc •- ca) moo_ a) Ecco - � �:� cc .� o_•UC -o _1 co CD 0 - u) L c 70 c 0 _o a) >,,_ ' EE Q a) +� c U C a) p L ca U) DU 0 — O L c U -0 a) p a) E co o D a c co p Q co cn __ C Q.— 4) O a) cn O > JE E U a) c O cn c c C >, O . > — U cTs a) -.E:7, C Q C E L Z 73 cn a) Z U co C Q' a) a) >, m Oc OU O O O C E > -CU) Co U E (B C as 0) CO •"= a) C O a) Q U o O O a) C CL-C 2 C a) C to p •O O U) a) c "O •- c -0 a) '• C a) co 2 -o N co 75 -0 N �_ co c O al >, 0) O O CD N o ca a) O 'a) >, c .> a) O C > J C Q co Q 0 L N p Q_0 — 0 C�6 O cp a) t a) C +. .-. U E cr) (o 0 Q L L N U C +� N Lco a)> a) U 1 C 2 0 C CD 0 ca E (7) •S L E co 2 L � E > (o o • -0 cn > }' 2 -c •S 2 c ,� E O a) - C -c O Z U O C O Q (o -C U U cn 2 C a) p y 0 a) L U U -0 C C L U O • C C , /_ m ' E C .C a) C a) -o O C L as > a) "O a) L a) i co a) co C C N p a) `O N (>B O p 0 a) OL W a) CO +� O CO 0 c C C U Q) 0 Co U) L - L > U) -0 Q L 0) N O .7 O N �--' -o -0 — O > U O L co a) >,0- L U a) fn c U a) C D N E U •L a) -0 p 7 W L U CD `Y' X I •S• Co L C a) — "- - _ -p .0 U O Q i U C a) O O > C U w U 2 C • O -C7 L O —_ i..1 _c p D 4 , E 42 a) p •p C Q C a) ,� c •co p -0 •cn CO coo a) c al LU 0) c D U C to a) �_' * 4— co per, _ O -0 cH a) -0 O a) C Q L a) O Q N L Q O co > C u) — O c C O TT) a) C (o U N C II _ C p O a �' _c Q a) cn 0 >,> •fn. co O c U 0) Q a) O E c _ -o C E co O J -0 a) O E rI U N LO a) .s H co O 07 O N L a)m U = O I a) QOCC E ' D co > W > Ute. O O CD 73J E o C v a) _c ma) JE .o E � mUo `� Ec) a) cow . g � °� -0o C j C co Q U o ca a) o o U O E c b U O c Cl) cn c E c O a) C E C as c U _C U, C U a) U L Q 0 U a) _ a) C E C co 'L Ja) V0E C p L C�O -C ,- cn fn U) p Co >, o a O a) O p CO p (o C a) 0 •al C O C ,�>'' V < U o c co QH E COQ O COI— -0 EU co U a) 4- -C - � aU22 E ,a EU a) m Qo o p Q-c coci, c p Lf5 Q22 O U O ± (13J (6 N U Q.E U 'i rY 240 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 0 c a) C) E .o 4- ( o 0 ÷cl' Q E u.(7) o_ vi a) U Eg = o 13 70 U L Co (i) Co .O U p '> 2 U N i To >+ z it co i 2 42 Ea' a) o Cn 73 C Co •(7) • E C Q E a) O C C U co a) •C C - _c O O c P_ U U Co co E 2 iO C 7) O O cn co U t U N Com.. cc i)) U C +r U .> CO .U a) >, N 00 _L -0 f C U C6 C CL) CO O — U •'fn o U U 0 C � . Ca O Q Q 0 .� m U O CD- o N -a C -•� C E Cn o • E- C2 U Co U) o a > CU o E CZ cn O a) > "�� _a) co -o •C O O > _O o C U 3 U � N C O A U o 2 U CC .0 5 O - 5 o L +- - = a) co L C t o a_-o O cn _ "-' C6 O C o •Co C6 C a C J O a) - o > Co O U. CO C6 -. E oC o L > C C C o o O ' 2 a )a — J E >, Q CT) .c ICS < 0EE ._ N O O a) .0 O -8 U M 0 4 H 0 241 — • • • FP O m aI r �' 4 0 0 1 11 If-� E i F "C 0 E ��d g �. ; a ,4 •'° .V ,1 0 E N - .- e, ,(1) cu • 0,Enul7ABLE 7 • " -,- M O cn czt �Q OU add $ S�`o�5,41G STRATEGY pH74„0, L Y� ktal E '-0 a) N� d��60 160 aO 410— 41141 N 'g O N › N SU•�' ^8 2 8 y g „-{i,3 dG 0 y • rx I 411 .JN .a � U7. /I " (1). oav] . a • .= I El E •71', 0 ° 8 `) E •-0 ....1 m .9 . -to { �o ° S" 14 C p " UU � 3JOz it — 60 g ,.x• 0d 0U a) . .) s,,,,,._-‘, O V , �s bhCl.) o E U btti° lP y Cd ct O .-1;; i 41 Ro r11 � p dY` J0, �zQ ,� .� � i; baodaxl 11111 211 O 4) ■■■■ � H yw CApo O O , i� c. -�/ '. .C - N "d a) ct to ii( ?I V ° P.Iiil y ,- E U U N •E v, F . o a) y0 E bA y ° .O �", bA N cz O y O N a) y I 0 ct , 5,�" c� p --� ° Q. s• 0 on W 0 .S . . . . �, = y > a : ° wOb1.) -4-, O ._, . ' .) ,G 0 v) tIO — ct OO�•+ 4-' s. H ' aO bA 05-,• › VD Q ° 5 � � c � • � � � y � � �■ F3 : 111'1 ■ ■ . 0' -CS b0 ' � wc. ° c ° � un � .0n �� . :. � � ■ X111 ■ 7v •.II 0ao 41 0g � � CL) teO „, , ct �, § ° � N � . U E •y fU O . • ›, F. °' Ng i"I -o O E � a' ° Ea" �'Ov , .5 5 ~ C m U = � ul ■■■ 40ill . . 1 •t ■` 0 O O . vO 'Cr.' +, bA U i• i PPE ni gillil • U a> + ) O -C a> a ?? OO - ° •OV U � - • yo U cd"o 6i oco o z G"O ^a � O , > U �, O • • tet �. a • O o O o ;� .� 4' O c2OO °' OrH Q. cn H ct 'C U U rn 9 Q� H 0, c.“..) 4-4 V H s y ,� P- cs V cn I� - Q 242 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT -� -O N 0 '0 v) O • H • • '4-i o to co CL) O o y °' cOi = ;-, 1-, . 47 0 •i), ' VIAIX y OIt p O O + d O O r ° s•, 5 U -o 0 -o , 2 O A--,v) N a) e H �O-, at u, i-Ocid - Ii 0 ill �' U .� ... p at O OtIO •.rte 0 }' F.4., P. N i1ii • H+ '" i: Ifl N ti)9, Cd a) U a) -" O P~ 04me, OOuNO -- v -O = .4 Q, _ ti O 0 CA.' Q H y ;� -C -YbA. -O u, s,y �' 'Q �.' a) 4, O s Q, it O O P. y , 0 V •Y 0 O O O c� O '� • 0 o p, P" ° ,-0 .4 4-0 C.) c '1 o ezt 5 3 C •.° w . . 1111 :-, �; >, a' 1111 � IRI ,° y•0 mu cct -�Hi et • U S Oy O - b°OA•i• p u O C o - to U -,' E -0 ° a) ?) ° a) bA p t=„ c.) w a) an O , v- v . • 0 OO~ O EL, •-, 4 •� 4 O v vi O g d O ,- O cO � QyOO O cn R "O M g 4tOO ,.9li : +� bA y Q O + Q N v 0 a c4 2 •zQ v5 A . O -o R+ 5 •y • " .� .� Lp -G Q .y a) cd . 0 , "' �, N C) O "C • s•, a) W 0 s� U ,�' y 5�0 v) Q•,.4 . : bA O F-, U _ N 4.4 U 3"v. v, " ° sx. ^ ct �� u, N ° ›, O p cd p y0 •g V ; ,4 .5 4, a ^� a '�� © V '-' >~ 5 '� • : g o ct, ,may � °' a y mss~ iI i _.,,n 71 „c•: 7:6,,,., uc• s i ! 4 ,a,....,,c r 6,V,--„c:, ,ifc• aA ??y a :y - QQ ' °O ✓ a � O W ) U p, .4 .° v' -p O ° OO O i vv; n . ,� 0 . . > v o 6U -a ,� U .O °' �a' n °' '� U `*" � ,° am ,�" v o V ] � •4CO �ct � O N0 y a) 0 = 0 O >, v, 0 � cd O f sO ) . p — cb � •., = U =: 0 aO ° •r 'N C. 'C t% � � , '4 .2 v Q -d O N bo - to 4, 9, n •� 6,� c id s., s-, •., � $b, s, Q a °: o o *do o Q s� -o bAlifi 1.4 64 p co~0 Og .= sn o :� ii U • 0 i . ct • Qr - N Cr; N co 0 0 ;,,, at coo > , N O a) +'.' O at Q•, 2 O~ Q L 41 �" p O O O "�C moi, o 243 U, -O M N cd y ) CU c ,..,to E-1' a ci °' a "' 0 -".../4 i.., cn ,..4 0 -4-, cd O cd Y a E �N" OQyOE 8 O $10 O et 0 cd O y > 4, ) 2E a) p ¢ rzl an ooa p-0 ga)-0 2 o o p yo d b10 vl czt cu ' '7 H y pU s p y OEO 6' rs 2 ,..) • o �" sy � O" -Oo y '� p4t.) g Z , a) 'b Q. a o °' .74 oD 0 '0 labs -a • = unci - 2 cabs O o ViD i,O � Cpr.O , , a Oti) .. q—, (.1 g . U ' ° cu N ,� ct � O O UdU p v 0 p rU o 0 pN ) ,- ., d ' cdpa) cd CLI O N � � . a E 'OO .gbA O a) ,., Op„ ,r - H 0 N • p +' n n a ° �' N n 11) U N s, N c 'C • V] '�C Q., ¢' m es a) p A O ••- O r a) O , p '� N E O U s� U U U �"jz, V' ., s� U '� cd s� , z y bA O s� > a) 0 a) y O .-� 0 O cd a) g g s� 0 0 -0 0 a) y ›, Q.,VZ v faL c• 0 d O Qm-0 g O -' ;-, O d . ''" g O , y •5 8 � 7d ' vi-9 Trj N oH4, O g 5 .d bp ,- �, cP -Cd aQ aU) 2d Oc,1 SO -p O vc- , • r • 0 0 a' s� . Z a 3 3 U U H v) a-O .5 o 0 0 -C = t U p ao abn.5 cp > -d E S c' l O ..' 'o E p cn 0 o y a . 'd O O -d •- o U -o ° [�— H a ¢�' ,- p, cl p., ,.: a •= 5 Z • 4 a cid ° 2 V A -C y °n 244 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Z. al 0 a 0 73 +' a a) CO m cu ca C V C - Q) a)0 0) co C_ C co C o cu .` O .0 ` O •CD C m M a m m a U +' Ot C a) N W O O C C a) o a U Q m a m co 0 W •` in N ` .a a Qm = ca o O -C - _ = `� O a (0c - o x I-- O •- E m 0 c O uJ co' u) [Cf c }' O C � �. sn 2 ca us m i.. CA u) a m vJ CO L, mu)r 0) o a H c m m U ia C U3 -- m ca 3 0 u) 'C — O to O m › C C2 C c L oN O � �° � � c a ro o o ''v u)—°� ca °ap a� 0 0Z,a) :c -o •o o c 0 rnco 0) wId u Z .J oRoc `° " o03 :� o .a c -c C7 a }- o - c Np Co cn u L {A O •- m W 'E Ca C ++ C +. Q V i aL, CO O (�} ` O C (� g. CC) 0. tt C I m u) a. a O F m G c L 4U- O u) m O N m "'a C O L EC-) i "V w _ 0 V }-- O t O ca m — .a u) m O m C O m C ca c- to O O ❑ :.2 � o- � t63ccm oo = = a �' Pica do's Eos om � °- c � "- cc re '� us •-• C m C Q) U) C Q O E c :2- Q -c p U = C w .CU 03 0 O ~ Q cabs.- 0 o •_ ccu) cm cam o 'G) � c) .. N to , ''' O O *•' 'O . - U a) E fA O u) +r O I cl 0 m -a — Z (a ,tea ? mal0c . .00 m � �, � o cc� .rc caE , 01-- p c m s.. .= a) O L ° -c .N N m U tt u) m CU .113 m 7 � C_ CO co0)N w. ca u) ,� CE7ca -c -- m a) L r 1- C 8 "� mo > 7 Oz O c .3 O m m "c5 .E) O_ m > m N 1 3 ... 0) c }^- � .` Q- › — �H :.' �, m 'rn � a- 0 ° ..' o o a) E co Cl_ ate. o ..c '4- m ff' cco '- .4„. ca P � � cu `� ao � m = o m1- ca � Uoc°i .° Q am moo ZV V 'o us w a a) E m 'a > ;II ' g o °- a? 4.' o 'a � E m `- co sZ._0 ir 7 .c t cos co E i. E c Q-0 — •` (ap Cl. co U '.- O c!� = V O a C Cj E a c � < 0�/ c ~ a � o ° U c m = 3 ° ,° -a E m -c a7n 73ti co ) u .c " (7 LL mom, -O 0.. �, O O O.y_ O V) .r C C w m ��, "'' L L � C .� — Wa mmc � EV Ec) cpc •c� o —LB m5 _ f° Os ca � Em Q'`a c CL a) WI m � 3 J o y N Cr)C Om L �) CO N C 'a N ° OCD N to ..-"F: m r F, m m C m .,' Q C m Q-.r ... •C O 2 m m e _A a a L C — Z � •W " E o m c SO c c 2 N m et -C s- m c m o > V TO o o 0-Ft. Z = --` o ma ao ::-..- Cl--a •Cip o m a $ .oma .� cr c o i c _ is a7 0 s E Env, ;: QC9 = a)� ootrx; ami �, m � ��' ca oU ay m L Ca) = QC Qom m0c O mom' = _0 u, p m N c Erna o- > -° m c� J 2O` � - ? t5 Ea ° o m '- 0.0 c CO. o c ECes t_. E 0 L :o E c a W "- +' O a E �a '•e a) t m € E c 'a c� m a ° c, m m e m E u) o O a) O m O-v c O N C 'a ,�,`� m C m .'C-• a) m co .0 O E C a) pG c — ,- ,,. m o — cam ro L -a * o v a .. •� 4- :a •o m > Z � • 0 0r, cCo O UH 1— O ca t4.- E U ani E ma o � }' o ° C 4- F m cn m m "r � u, c LL 0 n rt N y V E 30 �1 Q p 417-' a "J E '-' of CO .N `-• ) — C „,a) 6 -a V ❑ - a co O a) C c a) O 'O a) m N a) •N m N cn = ft) N H •y cu c mI- 'a O m :- m " ' 3 Oa +r ca . O O O C ) cu C .c c = 'C -a 'D .c m N C ..• m co (11 O -- C O C. .•+ U Q, L 0) C a) E o- m+= C C 'C ❑ W = ca ( ° u) a) 4- a ca 03 ) -Qm CO 0- •- Upm • 000E p � o Amo CD a ?i �- p � • 0 a 'p p '� a rn .I.' ca N 0 N � L N •N .O �Q) E "0 n *• O N �J Z = ° 0-2 " = O C 'Cy O �, EO u) N u) u) .5 U) •C vJ E E U N N N C C � > > o w e ca U o c 1 catZ r_. ami E U o m o — E — m - E w � mIC ai ca X WCOi) II o o c m e a) al CO E ",S=. co - a0 � -0 0. o> E c0 tt- uo a • 03 _c 2 -c c a) to m m a •r a w: °-'-' • o g ocacl- � � 3 � �, am EE if) 12 cu6 ,rn.- MIu)) aa)) = alar m3 I- °- Q) tr m _ L m -caca O E Ca C O C :M F" 5 C O a �U cs O co co O N a) m u) F vi m E u)a) ui O •? Q cal LL 4) O Ca ..r O O u) O 0 O C71 a) m N C a Ca .. cv cd R. Q- caw ca as Cl. ° E NE •` mEc m mc- I- 2o =aa) � COc -c P2o —om 22 � -aaate)) r a) o :"Ern 1:9 r `? N_ CU o0 c c .0 = 'x c -C 0) .c c .c t c Q I--- 2 C) ._.) IA I-- Q a Z o m O co I--' `1 > m C6 N .0 co . Z .w co > o0 > O_ > a.. 0 245 L OC CD N C -C c0 " ' CO 0 C E CIf; .` 'c -0 w '� fu C C _ N " 0 'o _ vcn 0 a'� 0NNca) U2N 'ma) ca)4 ,,,-a3tn c � 11 iii :6 N � • N o N c� " Nt 0' N o Nch >, 3 .To c .3 u) c ix p E •E 4-. 2)N a &N 3 .E 2 c a) �j 0 C upi p m O �, . 03 � 03 O c m ;. •N F"' t O •c a o aj N Ca co N 'p ❑ .0 01 O N ` •- F' 0 b .0) a) a > 'V .r }, N `0 4- co N -c •u) .3 c� N c N c N E 0 c f-' c c c m p 'v ° ui � � cin v' c N • � m co = s c N o a ` c c o)- 3 o c°� N = o o N }. N o � c �- o N '� «, 3 = ED- V 0 O 0° ~ L 0 N ❑ o N �+ N O N O ` C 'o Co. 'D 0 L- Co E C D1 C N N a) N o a cfl c N C ` j ca O o N 0 = •N +_' Cr) N •� 0 H 3 co -0 = 0- L CL o).2 in 0_ 15 N c = Us rn.c O a) F- •U _ 'C N .c ^p = a) N c ''V ~ : ~' u) N •E DO O — -- c — .0 c`u :_ N -- co 0 gii E C C C C o 3 N N • mH -oU = -o , C 'CO a N O o L- +. O 0 ,..(1) p N N .C] .0 — O 0 c C V 0 •X i_ -O •C c c c Z +� u) U 'u) .c c E c°i c IP •c .o C ca ❑ O al '3 N 0 0) co a3 d ca 0tE oai EC NAL o0 oOCA (a '9c � � HcMN la IR o .o d C •a) cs 0 d o o 1.1 iC �,C C 2 U 2 ❑ C -o C ' . ° "= C N N -- ` 0 �. 0 cu o o ,oo_ a c () _ c c o c � � -4 o s p cu o � 3 a—Ei ~ ° p a c N - Co0 C N O 3 L 7fi O a$ '4 • CIA C 1- ca 'C V co L*- m C N C O C N N O. N j N 0 C ,_ N c 0.1.... `� Ca Co 0 0 c N N 0 ate) ° N p"8 v O E 'c .tcaa :? NO _ Co0) 0 ' -o EN -aLu) :' a) acicam 'F) — o)$ c .° Ea 0 o Na O C U N tcC (ti co •E aC N D 00 'E ° O ` 1. E y ,- a) N a N o us ca N c 4- Nat L C ' • ca c 0 -o '0 0 ,� 0 "- N c� c`a c Y O N a c9 N > a r-. N ° �' F.. a= c p N o O N O a`) 7 p, i• ,� N ` N O E c N 0- p N E N ca) 'o N N 1-- ID c4 w N N N �, C N D) "O O 0•^ N 0 a 0 'C +' .0 L N d 0 — =• 0 C C N O 0) C ? r2 ,7E, 0 U C O p N _p H H c = N p '3 V c c U O N o 13 ca 0 0 in N N 0 0 .�O —=j 7 s N � � Cu N N 0) 0- 'c uN) i_ � '_ O V 0 N }' 0 O O V T. � Om 3 N "� .� 0 _ w O 'C = N + O C E 0 C a} N O C c c 0 .0 N 03 p •p :... ca O ° N N C 3 d L_ O Q 'O r) 00 NEv 3 -0Bc -c o oto — co co E -. cca0 -t°o0C) 0)° t' r) ` -oma C —_ E o 0 0 O ° 3 c c c N v o v N N N o N U 'g.. p m E 0 V j = 'C ~ N c N 4= = 03 C N 0 O cci N ! N C N N N c co Co a ° Ego N c �� coif E '5 o 0 a3 � 'oecnE c E o ° 2 'c •c N E 0 �_ CO O N 0 c .a) O E 0 j c ` ..r a) o) 03 I -p O Q_ 'o w.. O re U tt C 'O • C (� �, U CL � � c °) CD.9. ° � a°iV uHoo ° ° � U ca� E_ o.c � ,c o N .E I"' Co c j c O c .` p C Q C C c 0 = O "a ` N 0 = co.c N .= N '� N - 0 CoI -13 Ts 03CO p 0C 030) N O C O '-' C DU D N O a " 0 in O «: N -a O n N c +�. w O N N T� c '0 0 {6 ,N c m r- CO ` N c N c� N c� C N O a E p N - 0 E o o ca c°n s � N '3 0 " c� O C Co .c di c -C ca c � � upi c _ m «. p ? No ED_ o N N o y o �' = ° curooN o 0 (0 o � CNS Nca •_ Y E o ° o N el) a �° _ •� a , .5.1_3 a.- i 0)c `° c CD 2 s� •c3 •m -o cin o aa) ac o o ccs ooa? N 7 }, o a � � � v3� O -a c12 12 `0 N =,.. c .: N U C o C d t N c `c03 E to E v cte E E uu)) N [l 0 : a'Dv W as as --- coC c 1 N N N N Z`•E N o H a) ...J c O O O N N 'NO O C 0 O N ° t C) = m o I- o cu c Q'. o .` 03 u) E U N c a N a U a t0 c c3 .r N 4- al m }, CO w .- 4. jr?N N j, s- »_' a c N N O - N p 0 -c o N •ca xi U c c13 N a) .r N -o .n 4- o0 003300 0as .E o m co N N 0 c N CO 0 °- 1- . N N = o N a) -o ID -o � - 4 H 246 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT DCccCo0 ' 010_V `o6-cmcpr) .00 .c0a) O c U) 3 .. o .r •N 14- ''' .'' a) > ='.0 C "`' 0 - t u) N c .- 'C7 a) a c 1 U - ct� .. 0 O -c -c •� c W o r 0 co I- a) •� p s C �, o c o 3 a) 3 o c c 3 0 0) :Coo ac E o 2 0 C O o os w a •. m 0 o a3 co .. 0) C o w .5 o ai a• a) ca O O cin w .21"- - E3 p •c5 a O E w o 0 c ,, O .. y •a _rUo c .. :.. 0L = °} ,o E os .� 0 0 o) -'u� -c N c 0.'�, a) 0 C a) o o u, 2 c�a a. .c4- E o c I- c = c m e 0 c += o -o � o = = 0- 005 0 ° c p .. d u o 0 o w 3 co • O � �, a) v ' o co .0 L U .•. C w4_ 4-,N a) O C O O o -v ❑ U a) O O +. C u) CO cou) 0 C U N •C as -00152g ° 2 g;1 3 0 E ' •r �" v o -a O o = - t .....> o o ' o o .. !- O o -p c c CO = co rn 0 c� :� a) .. c� c •0 5;.0 a) N c c '+, a) a) •v +• A'a••' O 'C .: a) ai L O O ' N ' u) a) .0 -rs c0Op Ov, s _ c `_ .rU . 3 a) .. v E O3 cn C a - co OO Ca•_ OC, a .. ca) c . �, EOE •,.... H -c -a ' ai Q :c � o O a_ ns +- .. a• _ nE ' C O � 000 > > Qa > 0 ,� .. oC � a? aai �,� U) W - 0. .... .f.. -0112 - m =O ) 00 'aca � L � -� ctsac) CaUc a a)'a O0 c .o ,; O cn 0 -432 0H C � O a) `a C 0 W a) ` -c. Z.,.� i C `al v) 0170. 00 -0y) .-, }, E C co ~ N .c 0 .' c c Ca) .° c -a U .c co c mw - a) �"' U m- - '- c o E N cn co) a .X p n ..... O Q o c c ,._ 4_, N U ❑ -v o o o w " -c crjo c N '� L •C a a) Cl) C a) 0 O CO 0 0 c " -o O CON N 'a L" U) coo = +) ~ c Cl)O O C O .. OT) u) .- m -0 a..-• N C r.. O L {� O t Ca Cco a) cc' E a c Er Y Q 7 -v C O a) vi a) O E ._ O C E N C 0. a) c N C w c a) a 7 C O = L c O co ' g 2 w N m ›, a O 04113-g , '.j .61 0 C -E � � � EI- ti E u)i `o `� � s a' n-oi � -o ° o � rnm cin m aEL = ac ›.., 0 c 3 ca c ca 3 a) , O N.r 1= .. o a cti v a L 0 ov) < cCOM i3Nc. EE odc � v1 Du) o -c C O - a co .Ej v- m , Ea = E 4" !=- p ui E a) o O o o ' c c a) t- rn O �- .c co 0 0 CO CO Q) I-1- o C a c� :c c o � "'" u) p 0 cn o c� O a) ccu O > o � O o c o � 3 c •O C cn "coc69m P ° omwE -00 t � O � � � •Cco � N � � o C -a � ,. m � 00 co 'p C .' a) u) O O c V .. 1-. c0N `i _ = F- .r N O O C O CO co := 1570 0 a E o co `ii .. a CO 0) C C U) C c ` c = 0 .0) c co •cc .N c 5 I- . a c �..- o ma p N = .22 - c_ E wa) M CO a) . •oaoE c3Lav, o au) a) o •E0 .c_ 3 � c � Cpvo :. cimec 0 pa) C "r moo ,- 0oC C7)o000 }' EEEt ° t u' 0) o ' o " o o .� cl- o o Y •p c • 2 a)a, u) 2) •1 C a) •a cg V) 9.-p 'N O O o -o ._ ; a m OC a �. N 'N ` `0 V c r) c c cfl N c Q) c-(/) ._ o O c cn C o c C a ;.. ~ = ca a) O E O .a L O 0 CO 0 0 O O g O C t O C .'O O A O C C cn c4 Q as a) 'O a) c! a) c 0 0 N 0 •0 ca - 0 'a _1 a. 0 U :r 4 ]' O C " a) 'O C O p a) L .' •C C O Cl) 0 C V U c = a) cca a U •�o 2 �. BOO - 'o U C mW a).'" m :a cn Z 3 L 0 .2 c 0 0' � goo . 2 O c a rn -a ` d -a a) .. r 0 60 ;;; w7) - to c a cfl O a) t = .-: O c C C p .. 0 N C -a c e . .N .. =C E C E O E m C N 3 E o a) o }' ` +, '{� .. 'O o N 0 V ,.,c2 = 4- , 0 — s c0� a) � O 3 0 .0 0 ca—n -0 co E 8 O c O c � o 0 0 0 2 0 .0 Q v LL C U co -O 'O .3 E Ca a) x a) N a) .2 cU y v L v_) N C N U) a) a• U 0 a- O O a O co +, _ O O coO U a C '0 H mu):•. a) 0 a) O c C (0 —am ,= 0 c o c c c 0 5, o -a Em •o o) �c .N aO c 0 a-ri � c� 3 r u) o X ID m � coo ca 0 • E •v a) C �. H C .. a) ❑ 0 CO c t '� "' 0m a o a) c a) c � ° '3 cca E m E .c o .w Er L- vv •C y -o m o = CO C o � rn 0) 0 C N `� 'i7 a. a) O CO a) u) �, a a)- 46 L .. t C C a) a) = u) >. N o LL U H @a o •a o G — `m C UA 't4 a— o a u 0 .1 CO -c O O w 'O O C a a) m := a) •� - WE o a ~ ca ••••• c � Nv .a` - 5 .2 TDI- 0 " 0 75 = ° 6 °c maW o m ° 3 0 ° CO 'D a) 'a C o = U) t Mt-'C •Y N cti �, 'a a) }' 0 o C a)- O ..) .. O N c tl Co C co O a) a) N a) a) .r p G N 0 O U !!. Q = w — C U a) E .'C. .O I- O w a) '—� 0 0 c c "o c ca O co N I_ E U v wv -c ° o- O U (0 0 3v o '3 `a .� o o E Cw- co 3 a v) c O 0+ -r ❑ o a L a o�S ? 0 .. •v rn k- c a o E uJ O cn O = a 0 '° a .. s 0 0 '0 2Y v C C oCO •. - a U U c .v o C a) ,o 0 0 o O N rn ._ Y CO o - 0m0)‘-' 13 -a `v a) 0 c 0 ' > .. •a c 0 0 c ,_ 010w ,„ 0 .16 ,_ - ,„ m C 0 C = 0 C1i a m _ _ _ a) mm C O CG t a) C O (0 O O C N CO _ 01 0 'a _ O a O a) m ›.. G •C �U t ,r- v):ti a) ~ c o O .- .... .- .- o ' 'C rOn o N ~' O O v C U N _ ° U -0 .. .a u) L.L. a_ I— o I- u) -o .- I- .E a I- co a I- co Cl- 0_2 a0) 0 1- cow I �? a• `a m 3 c -5 • 3 o rn N +' c o .0 C6 N +�. L CO •N U O N U 1 a) .a -ci ai OmatZWE .o � ,� gui •�Cc3 .. mm 4- -c ' o ca 2 m m = o. 1- c� a co.) c cO. I` o cri 4 tri 247 cu 12 o -off C o co c -a ani a) ) 4- CO R as o = 13 Cu c C N L L C CO 3 •n o 0 0 o -o o -� "c�0 C c C0 .1'. L'. •«• >. N N w. Oa O O 2 L a - ▪ E cN w aE aoal � o . . . )c •• o a) o .c co co m U CD c0aa U)= rn3 t " cc .0 a) R, oC c • D o a a L Cu a) E c 1, � aU ;a a) , E c. •CuCaLL En m c ma o A' o ° it .5) x a � D as .13 • m L Ea)Q ca (3) m c .rco v I— v ui -c . O '5 o ° fa 3 0 .0 > > c a) a) 0 ° ---,, o •—_0 0. C � �▪ � 0cnE 'ooacno C NEcn CU o o a) �' C O � o �co � t ° Y -o o � c m O o" c O cuIt v 0) N o0. t a) a) rn O. N 3 c0 N '0 'a o p_ O a) _C 1` o a) u) o 0 0 1- 2 u) 'C u) O) 0) C sn a) u� N > �� m (� a� C a O Q a) a) c o c0 0 �, o O a) o f CD co 0z.o �: co I- ; aai _ o c ~ � v -off �? CO -7 .C "" L u) U ,° 50 0 '- Fa o L a co c a) C .ccoo t 5lc -.E -c,- -cc) .— cD .- 1— O.1:1 1—.) -o .� ) ca C. CoCN - C C)_ m u; d C0 0 0 �' x u) N w Ill .a ` 0 d3 'O O .0 C .0 O H 'E O a) C a RI a) C a) .ui C •"U �, z • • o C ca O' C N a O a 07) c 0 :r › a O o L 4 Q) a Co o C .0 o ca ....• m d. c O 2 as co a) N o N C c C O(11 C u) c0 a a) C O N -C a) „,c5 V L Cu '0 D..— O O C c No , Cu u) O C a N 'L 9 •as 03 O C a) 8- ° c cu .. E a 7 O o 0 a C c0 c0 CL t "w a) a) w a a L N L a .n N O N {� — 0. +� o f ~ ~ o c C c m o c� o a) t u) L ` a) a a) a) a) 0. w CD •:� Q a) k- a V m ` v U E > o U c ti N � C To E o o- c a o � O O)U) < a) � s 3 .o m e m Owe r 6 9 W .-• C .3 aoi t- CI ai � 2m 27) ou- cil to 2 o � a 0 co 0 0 W a, o 0 a >_ a) O c u) ~ � 2 2 U)) ° o N`o i0 I= "0 •u)C cd o C c •C ca \ CO a N c� t0 C o a c rn C 12 CIII 'c '~ C c ° n t a o • co 0. a) �' C Cu . 'o �. 'o c�0 `�° °: rn'o- °� u; ,as O a) o •E c cn co co M "-' c i '3 O 0.a a`) O -E a) •N 0 cn •v0 a p a) 'U O c N ° W O C o ca Q a) -o V c 2 aL) '` -a f Eirn .6 A"a -c c a) ocE E -ca) c 'C C. a ... -o O C c0 COC0E E .= Hoo I - f D I— Q I— o co c o c0 n Ito_ I— CO E o c�O > . E ! .U -� z co I` Co of Z o L C — r •C cn as O 03 U m d < 0 248 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT . cc cu ,_ .., ._ , . __. C... .. . . NI, • . . , .... _,,..,,.. 1 e 4.10 en o L ,.0_ 7 u o v / I • • V co ~ O 1 II' ` o -�� v = v N N I MI& �;.. 0 � � N • irlar V O ° •- -0 esi to .'.'; . j, ..l --'Itl, ''-'- APFP,rar.-: C i N to v N O Y C , Cr) C 0 MI (o0 o gC •� ^, -0- E ',--S' ' J i-i : it- . 0. N v o — msY 4- 4- W T _ r' I I N •� A a + in • f6 Q _4 � O .. i . 1 els �A co i ---,_ C • �1p N b0A u 1 - • . e _ _ 1 ,, _c, 0 0 Dc L c U) a v E �1�. A - a) a, H v > �} CC a c v E x a v = .1A Ps Ca.1 bp L a .4 a)` C -I--+ ,LLJ , ILI V N N f LL Q 0 y M 11) h N. M co N ti) O N O N +e+ N C > a) , E a) -o o a) C) co H > w Q C C 0 a) > CD ti) Q, C t N 3 O t4 N >_ V O O E o rts O O E o v O o co O Ct V E 0 < N ~ E c o c O a, AI a, = _ cn 2 c a > w E o v , • o _ -0 o u 0 coc Xt C a) a, 0 — w CI w d w O li ccnn d 2 0 0 250 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT CL co E -ao co V) E Q E 2 ao a) v v c 4 !"p ca c L c v, E > c t ° 0 v > v - c a... a, a, a, 0 O C a) N a) +' O- V a) fr6 t +-� L �, u Y E O u ° 3 E v 03 C 7 +, 40 C L Y O O N +' _ Fc > -° C z O � > s VQ - ca ° '++ V p v a, is v — ++ c +� vi CZ o on ° p v o2f 'C �° H ca tliL- C om-' C COCCI °� v a) fl E t 3 - a . fE - t ° v, c 3 _N E a) cuo o E c E ° C ris .� i a Cl 0 O i d CO N °p v_ E p v O o a ^ v Y c Cl.) v v v > c .0 ' O .- a) O _c "a U U a) V v, -D t L f6 In +' O 0 on ao +' a) o '- a o v o o on ocnu cu U -0 v '0 CO v Q aco C o E E o f i s o > u V) a v, co U Y ° - •U L °' °- i .E + a L n CU O O -O — U •x N a) v +' +' p v c v v a 0 C O +�-� a, s- C 'C i O N O a) ''' 0 as a) a) ca u v v no vi" y +' c c C 3 ° u �' .0 v ° m W v 'N o o c v t E N _ CO a) ° c c N 2 c C C 0C N _ N n3 " O 'O bA -0 v a L ° C C U c a) 00 _c E E +, 0 E - v v v n3 �' in +� > ca O ° v ° C u 0 o aJ a v E m +' C mon v v +_ c OC > • ' Q a, o c v o > °- +v-' n 3 C E L = N -a c O v o a) °- -0 . E a, C u +� •- CO a 10 •u v 0 E en tin a) ° +� >. o u © C CC ° +, C v L 0 a) C CI) a) L — +'73 0 U N p ca +, E a) 7 C IN U +' 7 ++ 'O T O L °' E i LL ut - U -p a) •+' a V cr a) (6 •7, a O co C o .0 +a ca O O 0 �6 gn bA •. a _ ca L O `� C ca ria �� ° w o to o i o , +, c o2S -0 c �_ t O� (0 O c ° +, +' -° > a1 +� nu u u L Q I w c a) on .1 > CO >, O +', in >, u c v C O a, c _c O a) on -0 c +' C +' v ns D O +' v •o v ~ u f6 a }; `-° `° a a) c L 2 _ Q v v O > c ° O v+ TE '� a .v • E C v ++ °- O C m a O p c v v °' 3 0 E +� ++ u 0 O 00 00 `° O C on a) "O (0 +' p ,- >, i > +, U a) a) (C a) CL f6 y 3 C a) N y O U a C v C a) to O u > O +(' +' > v C C 0 O 0 N cc " 03 E u a1 v v o_ N +' o v C0 c 3 v' v +v, u y •c c o U •++ C +' +' = a) v O o aJ +�., a1 N 9 O .� a) C vl N N i E •+, _0 ++ E hn O m a) v, a c of 0 oO C a) Q c +-' N U i ,� -c O a a, C o CO 0 n3 ca i E s E43 ° +' +' v, N C T -a (�,J v i V V d 0 �•' -ZS n3 �F E f6 v N }+ C ro >+ 0a o E ca = Q 0 o ° v, (0 0 c c -0 OC _ u C C v — ° ` To clac uvo E c CO •tu, L 0 _c c = v a *' 0 0 m _0 rn con°°po c CO� a13 o ° - ca v U 0 3 O C n3 on E ca Q. L a E v s C +' c aJ (:) 0 ('3 _c C E u i •£ _ ++ ~ v i a) CO tso a O a 41 S Q mO +v' +�' ~ t Ni 2-.), n3 O +N a ° i L (13 LL 45, +' a) L c u (B ,v v cEo U E ++ a u 3 n• +' 'i E on L c O Si Y O 3 +' n3 ii'M O . Ev c (C co 0 C P u o u ++ N ao a N = c0 c H Q v v, u M .- O + oC v, c .0c+aQ -pC O OE ° E n5 ucv zr O o+' ° +' 3 -C -O ns ° Oou C Q c + C n3 v o VI o O v v - N 0 v +-� C C O a) o. u -° +, E O ca v >. ro v, ••+ � M -° m Q •� U oc0 ja fY6 p G O > ++ a) U C a) 00 +, •'C ' C +' a1 v, a) �J U a) 2 ' Ca) aJ H L C E E ca ca E (o u +' a) u C O y v Y v, +, C O C n3 -0 c a) u v +, t 'C C v o uw on n3 73 on Q 4" -0 c o s a • O o o > o o v ° u v `° C o +, Q +' O c n3 v n3 C c n3 a }' C O p t v w crs v O " o C u +, +, v dA C a1 Q V) O on a v on E a) - C o c ++ c a) +' c c c v v O on0 U C a, 4- C UE 7 U C QJ a) a 3 N v p C G +�, - n3 t U C O L o O L L CU aJ N O y 0 a f6 -O a, +, C +' N O w C ca _O +-' L +0v' 'c ° 'U a +O.' aci n3 U 2 ,./) 0 fa o C a X/ C 3 C v a 0 U .7, ccs a 4.r v v v n a1 cCO + C o o E v E v v L fl y o E E ++ `cr, u CL o n3 O _a O Q 0 a) v u w •L a) u 0 0 v a °) O ° v 0 2 o E c +: cEo .E + v C n3 c •V (U to C a a`) .0 (tea v o - a+') o aC) w v c a) - aas Ccc ^ p ao co 0 0 f •C a p �Y ° c[o a) c � n 3 C aJ H _. i m N < o U U 'Q Q , 0- O 3 ° H C U c L l0 v aA n3 C W *co- v a) w ._ v o ° L +' 3 C to - o CO U �' u ° v v aJ o C 2 v °,n _C E o '.0 o aa)) v , 3 co u = +' v a' U a) a, 0 0 0 C v v 0) t v_, C L ,n v O C v, .- _ Y C C u _ - u O O u C C A' +, +, v L a) • O L a) c • V v 3 'v, C L O _ v c L fl t W W Y c on O > a, ++ t c t o u X C o a) co O co Q = O t ° ++ +' v c m a v c E W O a ._ of o +' a u w _ a U CO co v 3 O u of Q > o W > v �v' a o A A A A A A A U 251 9- 0 Lr) C a I - . — an w c0 •N v E ▪ 4-'v - = c� o • •> o ° o = 3 Q 0 ) 0_ o v1 I v 0_ o a - +, N C ▪ cc an �, o v; o a O `o oa) v) a co 0 VI = 4-, t V/ v; t 0 - a) 0 bp a4.4 0_ }' +' U c C Y ad cc; o I- ro Q Q Yro I Q N O O L D E O c0 — U N o U 0.0 i +J 0 V L C N _c a) vi C a vl E i a,0 a0 +L, a 'a C O 7 -O N I Q [0 -0 QJ U C C ) a)ttO v) c 0 -0 M U 0 O -0 i73 70 p > a +� L CO O }• vI vi +-, N N I CO U U C C N '+ OOO ppro O E 0 t 0Q W a E O •� n 'a0 a) U +•, N N — > 4-' E = > p to (0 00 3 L 0 LuN t co _o O -0 /fit C -' I +� 0p OM 0 N C > C C U_ a1 L D 0) O CC C a) /1 a 7 To N l0 M C .� a C40 a s O N a a N C O - E +, " a Y = aa)i E O E d Y a E ca O E Q uo O a N c 3 co E +co , c 0 ba E +' c L 0 Q c E _c +' E E cc Lu�. +� }' " 0 N 0 ,- v' tao OCCS OO b0 U O N O ,� O O E _ E a, >. C a (0 > C E0 V) C -1 (0 +_' v D l0 N c0 N lD N Y 0 CO U N o - a 0 2 Y/ O > c0 0 0 r-I Q 00 N 0 M N Q C bA L cI cI E 4-+ a d E ate-, t • 0 0 LL LL M r-I Ill r-I M 00 l0 N = c-I Cr) r i H UO O •- p Q •. v Y v (B O U C > .0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • c r0 0a 0 " U +� C V f 6 a +� 0 °- I r^ a co 3 i t0 O 'a I v V v m 0 a £ O U Q a +' a) v> v • L } n Q U Q 73 v a = O O O V a) E N (4 0 a a '� co v co O ro ON 00 O a) C L A' 0 -Cs mw ct 0 t �U = d a W +O a0 = 0 > v C /�3 ° •— 110 C E L n C C O f0 C " a) W `, a H >- `� +' (0 0C W O C v1 • N v E W vi C O + c O Q c a 0 o o aaci E ns N 0 Q a 0 Q s ca Cm - QO. E ' C LI V a,00 p O 3o c s-L -0 +, o,o Q b� c v U+, a >O a) C ro 3 aoLs t = E E o lo , C o >a 0 I— �� N W � o a a 8 252 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 1 a N z-1 ai C L a Lo CI L a - a� Cao O 0 O o - ▪ L C 0 I▪ O o a `o c O �- r + O 0 C r 'a to O 0 u a c a) E 'a - C L. wog 'O 'C O Ec 'a V) O s i +� a a O +- O > .0 (0 E C C 0- ,U co C +O co I� 0 n dA by Q c� O a1 lr U D O ( Y 'F CU ▪ E ms°, a) 0 3 v A, EE -� -0E v ° I- -0 O a c -0 lin C U L O a C v v CD Q CO 7 +' f6 a III C p a a 0 Q ▪ E a) v C E co i 2� N = CU 0 C rf O N a a U 03 J O C a a) a) o 0) +, e a O C a) c a a N o O 0 a) ul ° N '° a a) a+-. C a 0 a) c c C a m U +� co a U i >' N C C m C - vs Q 0 i ro a C •O E o a) • CO X0.1 N 0a r-I -6 U 0 0 C 0 Q Ill ^c i 'v, >> Q- a C 3 a) C U 0 C i a C v) v C C 0 C U p U vi +, m a _0 O 'O I0 LS C in 0 O a 0 4 •- Y Q a i a C O L.L ( CO aw H O i C cO o v, o o v, + a E a Q V c m N cO v a a) O Q CO _ I.) a O O v O ° 0 a .O Q S Q o m -0 a .� a a ra tO U U O a) C a •> Cu n Q 0 ,r O a a.) Q c -O I' Q +•' +, N (Q C .. N a Q Q a O 'Q vi C 'CO C ° C 0- 4--• m i 0 N N t 0 N C 1- C Q Cll O (>6 CO O vi •- O }, _c a) 4A i v) .� +J a 'a O — C ^ = c v) a) a +J p a) vi a C t H c ai } ca u (O o0 C 0 co M v, a 3 a vi c v a; n ° `� a co N 3 o a 'E ° c o o O o a H -a ° E ac) 0 C a) a -0 , t 0 •— H a , 4J a t co E a a ° °° ° a +' E ^ v E Ca) - ? 253 CO al LA C Up O O O O \ O O O 0 O O O O O O d- d• N Ol d- 0 I.fl O N m o --) o --) o 0 0 0 0 r-1 en d- c-1kc) Ln 00 r-1 m c-1 Lind' lD M Ol C II d- d' up O Z o O N i o 0 0 0 0 0 0N. 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Gl ii al N 1.n %-I N =I1 =1 `� d- N m fl. Z m Ol L.fl m N Ll1 (-Ni 00 =1 d- N c-1 N O N N N >, D i oV a) 0J ti N CO - N cr1 G1 a- N +- a) p O^ 01 -0 v N O^ - N 01 al C (0 - tv ate+ ' °° O 3 0 CD Q N O 8 'G0 •. a_ cc c >. N .� O^ N N 2 a) - O -0 Ol N O1 OC cc \ t Ce \ CO i O 0 (0 ^1 ^I r', >N vco ii C L C C p -0 H 01 ra C +T+ q4 i C V' al w ate,, �O a) . L f0 N Y i m r 2 *L Ce O -p 4' i i i L 1- „,"” co- L > To C �? C U ti (0 N (0 ' 4- M 4- 'O+ 0 Z L 0) Li 0 Z o O m O Li 2 Z0 Z d Q cm rn H rn H o Orn 0 0 vv Z 0 Co) L vi \ Q 03 W 'C11 d C u a) 0 OC Q t7 OAC Q C7 a 0 254 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RI PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT E 1,-- E p / / a. 3 =roC 2 \ } Q L. § }§ 00 / § (13 ° E 3 n / \ E u G o a) ? \ > / 0 \ ..-- E °• ° E 0 0 o { c e 0 0 CO \ / 2 CO § 0 / \ k \ » ) cu E E ) _c @ " o ° Q E \ \Cn / > $ u @ 3 e 6 \ 3 \ U Cn \ _c w \ / / m _0 o CU ° _ § j ® ? '" E / t \ } U q CU o u \ « m [ ƒ / > u CO E c a) & - ® >, 2 $ f 7 u E a $ + —, _ _ EN QC / / ƒ E w / D In ) U k E Z q _ \ § '� .o q 7 ƒ \ E N ta N E g w / � E 0 0 2 2 \ § / N I I ■ ■ CU a) O c § i ° 7 ° S ƒ V co• 2 o \ k y — G \ ° u = { a a , o , » % § % CU 0 a) .V CL m ° _ ' k = ai_ ® / \ § ( 3 o E ° E e I m E c .o o _ _ 2 @ E / _ = E & / \ { § = t / M o E % r s- c ± ® $ % § % * , ro ro § I / I 2 o / _ E ] c > c u 3 / a Q a $ ] / \ } » ` g 0) 2 — \ k ® 5 / co® j \ as 2 CO / C +S ° / = / ƒ , , , - / / \ 3 / t ƒ �2 d •/ . E a O k t CL 2 f \ z q 255 00 1.. v; o v L c co a CO aa C L Q L a)LPI J-a L n+' >. ki di- a... pC +' 0 a • O O L +-. a 4-, L +' O ° = E ' c a -0 0 O a 0 0 t o a U C (0 +J t10 a D 4 C (0 o N b1A +J a) +-, = a) dA • a LJ CNI N C U a as +� a 0 ra L -0 '} C C L c0 a a) a o 0 a) t +., Y ca a M U Q to L1 c6 Cr L r-I 10 0 �n 4-+ N V o N O C U a) L - (6 3 CO b�0 L N — a +� ,� CD .-1 c0 a�- o >. 0 Oa O a to f6 v ca C +-+ UJ CO C +' O a C +'.+ a L G CO Lf) E a) +J a of L CTI C 0 a 0 UA c ° L +' 00 w 0 a) O E 0 C Q a — o C N .E Z c al a; ° E E v ° o o s_ • of . E > - a) 0 L cis 4-a ° Q O ° CO f... ro▪ a * a -0 E E .> 0 CO as I- a 0 ro o w ° 41 vi L a- _ a) In O >. N rjj as u v au ro L c — a CO N c a 2 aai O to t a) " Q c > a o a E 3 0 a� >. O +� cv a) '� ° I•— a, ++ U O >, +, ca a L — - t 0 E aa) +, CIA > t ra I CO N Z = ▪ c CO 0 v o C E U Q n — 7 > C L t0 +-• � -0 _° a o a u a) 0 ca _c a a c Q. -0 ra L i� C . c0 U +, +� v L Cr a)+- N — 03 ill CU E CD a +, _ C = (a a a (a — fa GJ 'a C tt o O1 s_ L O v _O a t on Z v 0 a = D a) on i o .. o c E c0 — L O E u Q +, L U .E +� C a E +, +� 3 a a — I E o -0 o -2 c C v o E 0 o a°, ° a b ° a v a L C .2 E +'13 E V U E +' o 0 a U L p 70• a c c c u0 tt0 u _ N - +� > o C o CU 0 v +� cu — L u 0 — a = E a a s -a ,., r0 Z �, c0 co a cp 3 �; CC = v v E = o aa) v ( ra vs v -� Cco o O > 0) C cu a -0 o • CIO CU +� A o Es_ co _o •E ,a C +° o a = a V a w w t0 - ° '+� Cil "' a c > 0) cu a) E U c -0 L Y a a) a " ams a ca u a cc13m L- rsi 0 co m a H H o c CU a ,; a O �► a a a E a) a sc_J t a a) a a W O Q a • _ L L CO •L 00 H 2- O t10 LL Z U a ‘ I I— I— 0 L Ce I— Ca 0 256 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 0) N ai Ov -c v a) F- = u 0 U a) CZif) O a) .0 i ' �r a) & E +ro ., te+ C a-• O � Oil ) ro a) C C0 C N v C E Ea) a) E U O E O C o c u v E v u N a) o E E .- >. c � `� = E +, To 0 ° EO a>i a) a C O ,} v Uro > > L a) w E N m C v to c) } +. E -a E +J �, (o �, a) C 4-,LJJ (6 Ca) >' E (6 0U a) C ca +-, t co - Q a) E u a) E E o v Eo D m -0 c vs =OD (AE E rt a 0 ° +v-' •- i a) ave+ 0 0 - a.) a) CU 3 o o E v a) m 0 v775 c v t E t E > �- o f io ° E v ttio o U co C O E = a) 0 EO +, , EO - N •3 3 U V U C N L.) C cD v C U E = L ++ > w a1 a) +. co _o + t� O " N °� cn C + M N a) V v E C N _c co >` a) C co 0 ~ = _0 vi N a) E >,.. a) S -' I j, v a) Q a) a) a✓ C i ao C +J +, E N C S C E a, n c = > o E N o C v co ai o v, 4 E >, U O E a) C on 7 4J i U Q a1 '> a) .. in 0 c 0C C o E — a) 0 i U U — c-I a) O U L 4- () a) (C i o c) (6 0 C E a)• E t cu c '- o E CO aN+ a o a a) ) ° c v v 0 c E E H a U a) i a OU C Q _ C 76 > U E a O C E E o a) 0 0 +' v _ n C v1 ate, ao C '� L^, 0.0 o w a) v c C E O " -a co a) v, -a +-, v) 0 C of a) E a) l4 a) (6 +•, a) O +•, C (6 %--I 9O a) Q '� 0 o E v = a, (° 0 N C °°7:5 •i E v -o Ea) c (0 v E G., •- to Q-0 413 E C o a 0 aUi .� v ++ o (o E a; C C E a) 3 E L — v (° (o +� a; v Q N v ° C O O a) p W C C •v, (B L +N'' a) N a) ° .> a1 Q > O N Y a) a) +_� +'6 a) Q U C _o -0 O v, >, C U C L N _cL (B -0 N L — i U (D +, N L a) n3 +' -0 a) +.+ a) a) .- � a) t 7 Q- t I • C C a✓ (v v, +.+ N in E C E _ O a) 2 — U O > a) fa E a✓ C (o N +, >. 0 v, v- • +' C v, a a) aJ 4•+ 'a L + aJ (u O v, L 3 O N > i O }' C d 0 3 a) 0_ C a) 3 C f0 EO i `^ O > t>o a) C as E v, Q -0 C 4- C V1 p O O = +' a) C >, N U as a +, t U Q a) W U C o -, +, -, a) G1 L Q Y .r,-, •_ ° . + - v E aJ o- - (6 -0 i x - N L O C O E N 0 +' v, N Q Y ,n a) 3 a) > a) 3 a) v U v O �, n t CU v Z oA W +� +., 0 p +., i +J N 3 +, t 'a a) s C W 4- F, a✓ C p +, 0 0 0 C v C +� a a p +� c.) a) (a C +� CO v m v) m > m (moi) H ra a) 0 m (n 0° (n 5 +s+ z m >` v L (0 4- m C7 °i o 0) o W L_ , , , , , , , , , -0 S • • CO Q O O • •• •• �O — 1-m 1- 0 N H E H H U 257 O "Ci co O c ') a•• l in a s (0 Z L C a, tW 0 c C ° ++ vi 3 N a, g 3 v on -*' o v ° v ° o 0 v o O x -0 0_ a, o2S a, i L° , a) C o +, o — cc CU +, Oct, c = c co Lo2S E v � A E U +- a, — a, L L c TA U C a, N CO .+� ra 0 a, o v a, — v co▪ 0 0_ 'm o N +� — a u +� Q > o E 0 v 0 O v ail M o c .� E a, U L as V z -6_ i N u p o -6 a, a, c 00 a) a v, . rY �O -0 c,., a, E ro �, .0 o > +� 0 ■ o6 v, ra > a, 17;- > '> "' 0 i C •- rn� -0 H .� vi w rn o6 v, v, a, co a, ro -0 o N c Y QJ E o • • • L (1) E VI a,▪ L o >, \ i +' U CC 0 Q L o o Cd' CU = N Q 3v. i 'n •O > i N i _0 c •- L •aA 4 > O a, CO E ° aa) MI a > +' ai � -o N >O - a, L z co co o CE >, To c t L c., o s '47, CO o00_ co 4' o o o +., En o „c c v, U ra, a, a, ',=,o 0+-, d (J a 70° Oa, o V) -0 Q- a, — '^ d Co = +, (130 o -0 a, - fa = E o2S L p c Q N ° + +' o?f ° v O Vf c d Q- 7 .> c am_, Q E +J n 0 L U \ Co ++ v N C 0 zs a, VI CS Cl) a; Y -� Q N i L 'n M i u Q a, u c Q- ra c� r6 p -t3 CD a c Co `� �, 4J E 0 .. co '3 o ° = .� x a, ` L E ° E i.o -0 ° i • o Co O 0 a, 0 c 5 E o o o a, •c � E +• o '(0 ' • d: 0 Cl)_cnco c p� COim 0(13 v , o -0 M CD c aA L ._E ”, a, = U 4-, c v v ra a, v •'v o ,_ Y c } LLJ v v c m sz a 0 Q C7 0 c w L 0 =• N co fC v ^ c CD . o973CO a) v E Ct a, - .L CZ a, d! a, 0 v o M H E ° cc H 0H" 0 258 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RI PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DES6N REPORT / = a e § 1... \ a) 2 £ G a) !"CP $ Ca) 6 C \•� § m a) / \ \ 5 0 - ƒ j � \ 0 73 / > / % @ / / CO m $ 06 n # •- \ 0 _ E = % w -Y N 00 > E � \ / k - E S / U CO .- E � � U 2 \ 7 '\ in 1° / k 0 - C 0 E E G E C § \ = 5 a) E / / = s m f > CO / . . . — / \ k a) , + / \ » y 2 / 3 { 2 2 E a) 0 v on / a) • $ E g G 7 NJ a) [ 3 -a 0 0 8 E C •e \ 0 2 / CD J > ' 3 CD > m ) R ƒ Z 3 \ / § 2 / k f - 3 2 -0 2 y \ G / > u = y ( / a) / o 7 2 / ) B 5 ° ° ƒ q C R E $ a) / / •E• � a) q § § \ 2 { : / [ § \ / / 0 . . E • e R m e S ¥ E ƒ E 3 ± § o e , x m .– U & ƒ / $ ƒ § / \ % E E < E # -o @ / 2 . v / \ a — \ E I > 2 \ ± o Q e o R _ E 7 o . o c c 2 $ / { / / ° / f 2 06 2 a $ co \ c E § - - E ± C \ / 0) < E » uF. U 0 .- \ C c0 0 / \ / (6 . E t / § § 2 7 y \ 2 $ \ f \ y ' e - E 0 U Om 0 -' § § § 2 - E a m = 2 2 E j 112 2 f ƒ F \ / > > k ) / / \ k as> ro k / W k / ± 0. _0 2 k o / CU i'n / j E \ ƒ " \ % CU- \ { V) o u ca in ca ■ E � / • 2 e u = E •u = Cl.) 9 \ 2 C $ ° I - c g -o 6 c = E g u u — s & CO .471 § f � § \ / § § 0 I / \ / k < / Cr) _ $ '– -0 •- E 7 E 2 § C / Q• 0 .\ / : E , , , , 0 - $ g- < E -0 3 U 0 259 ON N 1... — +, C O > a) 7 i _ > a) ro co c6 ate-' 4- f6 +-) S fo v, U K•L •a) a) C a) v o Cl) a E O U a) c a-•+ a)N E a) a, U o r% o i v O U i Q 'C C c C bA E C a) N... t? `cu ° O a) 'E U C E m O , +, a >` o ° E c C i C i ro L N O O �-' O Cl) a) p C vi C i C U c E E co en c C +' c rn - a) E a) E E a) U +° cu v, +-I Cu dA 0 a) C +� C i OU N0 U C ° E a) a) b.) °c a) a) U d- +-) co n+ H Lc) c O o — E L a) N C E ) ° o �; c a) X o c 2 — Q v, ° E ° a) N C O +' v U E v, v a +� co o 73 C U C � '^ .` E cu CO aJ E c > _ c) +, C a) v 0 o o 3 ca c E c C a) C C a) C a) ca E > c ,.� co •C N >_ ° ° ° ns vi U O • a) U U ••C n o a) }, c c co a) �_ .E •L to O 4- o a) N +� o a, O — U no E •+, '— U - • v a) co 0 C O a) —v .0 v p -p C v1 — +� — ,C O aJ +' +' C U) °_ _6 -p U U H - (6 v E a) E C v, co N c v 0 E c v p c v; a) T • E v) O N `a c a) ,Oi, 0u CO p v, c 0 CL v 7 Y co u a) N CV +, o co E p c v z > U +� i c _o -w v o .� N �' E a) v; v o o U i 4-� a) O E C +-' C co +- cc) ,— U '� N a) CO 'O p (6 C c6 a) L +, C �I� ▪ C a) a) to h0 U txa `� C ° 00 dA C p a) c t C ° a) 00 C E v E C a, N C a) Q CO u ° M coo O 0 0 `" � > E a°10 E + o v v E v c Q' + ++ v a) v ac) _C E 2 o v c O E N - - E o o C C a) co c tea) 3 E o c) 0 00 -C+' a)NE O oCU a) o o m o U +., co E 3 E - c E c c r' - +� i ° U ,n t I` O U N = O 0� p t U 3 0 U (0 E Q .E a) O 4 d O v c +� ▪ v, rn 0 c 3 0 a) 0 0 , aC) c 0 v E a a) a) a) U a) v) If) U O o cco ` v U -0 v = L -°a 0 v E c U C ca a) 0 •+' m � °A N v, a Q O L vi E co .0 O � Q • C O �! to N O O a) a) C • u C O U p N no U U 0 + 4-, +� C CO aJ L nE♦ Q) p +.' +, (a V1 +, V) a) co •/L L a) > L a) W v, C U U r a°1i a, '} v, tj �' E VI E C O 0 > c ,+� v C C +J v, L� aJ Vf i.� >✓ C CD C co a-+ - M !" U CO O O L U i i 4— t O +� co a N C E ° I W I— a) a) O o o) Q U U o CO ,v coL +' �° v H E C ,� p v i L cD cc a c m Ili I I E Q V 0 cu U L i I I I I a) v v) a) L O a) Q- ha - 4 E v C a) C 4 L ° Q n3 (B +•+ +J 0 m U ) 0 H O LA H Q co H D C m + 2 0 .E O8p a) £L OZOZ `Z (In"pajepdn—podaj luawa6e6uel co wow jol %OT e •••angaeg uo app I1!^^ %6S OJOW aRI e ••angaee uo app II!^n I — 111 awes ayl lnoge •••angaeg uo app 11!n^ I ■ (6Z=u) c'pnle angae8 uo a)!q anon(app noA ual}o Moy pa}}a II!M sluawanadw! )lulyf noA op MOH laaM e aD!nn}JO °Duo -AIaeln0aH - %£Z JeaA e ap!ml JO apup -AlaaeH %Sti uluow e aoIm JO amp -Alleuo!seopp %ZZ a_ a JanaN _ 0 U Area lsowl '-AnuanbaJd ■ 0 ce (Z£=u) apaenainos angie8 2uoie a)iq anoA app Apaaan3 nog( op uallo MOH (Molaq}Jeya aas)wow lol e angae8 uo a>liq app.app of wail aeanoaua plum sluawanoadwl pasodo d ail legl palealpul sluapuodsaa;o%6S:dlysaapia apb!q paledplluy 137V1i lviii 0 261 1. v; O c U 4■p a) U E o i E a n O `, � } C c m u 0 0 c c a) a) v, U a) U E E U Q U C E E E E E a o — O O U U E U 6 U 11 M O + +. +' ll vU on C C c -a°' O m cN C co i dA N lB 7 L +' C O . a O U OU Yii L +' u d lD c-I v) m co C (o a) 0 N LE C a) O a) 0p > L Y +' V) v E a) a > O +-, > +' Q cn ?) c U +� Tii 0 X -0 co a) o c +_, 0 U a) +, s t Q v •( E m co co L r1 �_ c oA C L < m a) _ � ^v' U o z w 0 00 c E L E L C a) L..7a) +., -�— O C Q) > U ) U aai t U -a c 3 as o U O 0 c L E C C +' > co U ca +� >. 4 Y 0_ c o O +' . E ms O X O L O L O Y >• U N N U OU 17 Q to n t O Q m v 3 E O O a) n3 +� v, +' a U ( 0 N N 10. N L V) C u N m Y O iv C N +' c Q L O O to O E co v } N m U m H N c N 0 Y C a1 0 0 a) >' +, U v av'i coo � E > 4" co on C 0 a) o = O o ra c V) — a) >. o c 0 = 3 cco co v, . c cn C +' C oA Q t v' EU c co M ^ 0 Y L Y 0 > a) CO U c6 L L O U N N v E ? I— co +� Q co — U U . C �� U 0 0 L C U 73 ,.., >, - a.., U U c U -0 C C +, 7 a) .0 N a) Q 'O `� U Y N i in a.) U -0 U t N 7 a) a C U (6 ut c�6 > +' - c -O 0 C a) OL vi on a) —_ : U N 5) +' N 0 Q D E ^ C C to — O +, U /�� a) Q O d co L N d to - m }, V) a) W L O 7 t6 N = L L E a, t L U U L C 0 U o —' a) E O ,n 0 N rn E O �, 3 v O o o c o a N n3 o c co E n do c a) +, E w 3 = a) 0 O L L +� U a; c " v u +. Q 0 U -a a) E -,;•,' N v' cLo 7:3 U n c c L V vOi O Q co co O a) +, a) _ Q U +' L Y U 0 0 C C C 1� Q 7 ca U m a u in Z U m N Ce u a o - La n°A.o .- O U -0 o .7, U M o I U I I I CC a c I I) I C N ++ L L 7if) -0 (p C = �) U L 0 0 L to l0 I co m r-I a) tr) lD c) to 'n o c n ro o14- a) 0_ U v, o C U us N o ai U it 4# 4# 4* O C 4 co a) a) L i i O 0 41 vi E C ' O cu N Q .v +, +., +., +., +. ++ O +, +., +., E •v) E a) E a) 0 0 ra +' w E U N 0 O C . U 00 U U U U U co Q U U U 0 in C ") E C 0 0- O u c u a)C a) U 0 0. C a) a C c O 'O 'O 'O 'O a) O 'O 'O +' O 0 O = 7 C •5 +' L O O 7 O C CO •- L L L L co C c D U J N Cl) C ii') 4J c I— m to U • C . c o d d d d dC13 a a a C CI 0 > oLA E p 0 0 — ao W fo vl t RsE a) 3 E c0 a +., a) a c, 0 N U U m o N H H H 0 262 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT C 4- C NNI '� C a) N a•.—I 03 O i a i L 4-, v, 4' a-' +' a) a L C co U u +-. 0 a s -5L v a) V E v C - +, ,} U E > C ca i y I . O O 0 U C UVI IP N N C a a) ' co o E }' = C U vi ' >, C > i ra (B ao a) a o C O a 3 N E 0 • 4, v C 3 v E a a YO N U m �O -0 C N N E L C co = -0 N 0 N Cl) E U N C C co +a' C >' cn +a' C OU ra co Q ro c WE E 0 (i= I` E 0 a +' ba �'„ co aai N > a) C C a ,, C +� ML.n � a) C 0 CO .siz +' U C U CD +' +c-' E v, a a x a U 3 I. CO C aa) O '`" E N a o • • 'o •O I. +, a E Lc-) C C C C N 7.0 (o i C C Q of E +' ro a-+ a S- al r6 C aJ L C +' % OU chi, +L' 0O a v N or U E :30C O U a O C taD LJ a)sf, +' _ E +.+ O .� U N a) >, r," C H U a L -0 -0 C C 5 a C +' C 0 U E a 00 -a a) .� o +' 0 U .N v Ov N >_ qA ca a .� ra Tu C N M i co o g E D CD +' \ > I C > C hA = N N O C N aa' •qp U O L C Y i 7 a-' a) 3 'N ' C .� >' CDC a Z a) H ^ CO v v, LE +a) _ Cl)+ -0 0 a) C O O Ei0 `1 C N +' m dA Q +' a) - I— -0 co '+� +' E• Ev ++ C If) N •2 -0 O _0 to C OA co Cl) -0 C C _ 0 C a) U a no C co a) ca 13 C U a +' G1 E to -a O }' 'I co a -0 C +' • a a) +' v1 co U •N +t' CD }J C (a ca - i0 O N f6 a +'' a a) to v, to- v > -Q +� a O -O Q u 0 u NC N Cl)' a To a)) I 0 D cu ._c f6 •- O 0 LJ U co vi -ci .. (a a o on C Cl) Cl) C CD l�' O Lo. o 'p C E s tj a1 i C > +' i a +' N .- a a) CO +' L O +' o + co M ai co0 >a) +� m a a +' a) av O a C C cz E 'O •.-... v ›..o O 7 C O CO �Q �O N 41 v a) E CC O a �, to > H > v 4 E _0 E 3 ca _0 v E +' ca co a-' -0 c 4 W U L C L L L L fa O O co L a-' a) •Q +' +' (�) () E _ O O O O C _ a) to U a a C a L L L V1 a) > O o o }, C Cr a) .- a) C O U w 0 E CU a C E + O O E O O O a o p N — +' O N E a a) a) > a) L a) a a a = a to O a _ a +' +' U +_ O O Q) E a) }, a a a CT a i Cl) C 0 a) a > N C U U C O co C V' U OU U N C cn cn (n \ I— QU ,moi, a) .- Cl) m C w w U Cr C C OE co 0 N OC w EI I •r E a E 1 1 I 1 LA_ C 0 U C U Z J U 0 263 CD 0 4.Cl > a L C c6 V E °J qy�■ E `6 10 0 0 a ti_ o N •,; To 0 +� CU o N0 42 > La E - a) c E cn f6E To '3 o +-) N U C ✓ v +, -- E +� teo C v ✓ L L O O C tw w C '- 4- La '0 o O 4- c6 0 c a) ac) v N = N ✓ f6 E CO c 4 aci o c c U 7 E N ' • E E +' E • °; o N o E a) dco 3 lvI O o -0 •S EN Q C0 i Q 4-, ttO CU � U c I N Q - t10 0 c of L CO 4) 7 0 OCU U a) +J 0Ua N 0 - O coCCt NU +-, ,>- +r 7 f� O C v w c E co -, N c 0 E E Q a) N c •E E G1 E v a) v E ro La 0 N EN +J U 0 E N i C -cU O > o tB O O w U Z 0 cn U Q c C L E _ w •� E ' ' ' ro ' ' CC Co W Z 0 264 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT N- ..- - - ,,r > o sa N o N c N ° iii ° o a) v) oN. o m �n rl N. N N N N L }i C O E 3 E Cl)CU E 7 0 ca V ?� w O o s a) ✓ i o t I— a1 _ • vi to C - a, O 0 co co o N C o H • N aw s = N ++ a, �+ v oVI C z 41 ■ 0 13 O - c U to = cL a, 3 N N. m k.o m r o m D E ?� Li-) d- a)m m u-1d- •v LE - I o 0 z z z z z z z z z z z z z I I 0 V S ._ = v a) = z D H n ca a) a) ra coo H Q- 43) 0 �, v v ccu a) ca) Ca) aL, aL, occ occ +� Cl) Ct (n cLa o s m co I v a) to Cl) _ _ +. +. s E o E om `^ 00 CO CC vzi u Ec0) 0I w 0 _ t p) •— N +.+ m C }/ 0 UO w C a, SD- il fa a, SD- 41) of - o = 0 265 n \ 1 . G CO I % /k u e = E 0 & 3 ° a) o e s \ 3 / / m � ' # / ƒ / • 0 \ R 0 / C (3 oin - / \ § � ) G ram Co ^ 2 / \ 2 / } E o ° / § ¥ 0 m \ E / ] / / \ £ \ 3 ƒ = / / 0_ o CO u / 2 I— 2 g o a f \ u C 2 2 C f t = 2 -0 0 $ k \ Co \ / m \ / f \ k Co E m - e CO q C11 E 2 m 2 § � fa q o L. c ' E • E • 0 U \ '7 \ •E } ) CV / k 0 iI k / >• / u = E / - m ® » 7 -0 y / 2 / / k 2 y o E_ < / : 5 $ CO C / 0 � (73 ) 0. 2 g y s > C C ( \cu \ t / 4-1 2 / e) s 0 CU 4-1 ƒ e ca m / ƒ / / / tn \ ƒ Cl) Cl) ■ ! \ Cl) ! r f = _ _ / CO .g f • \ / CC o B 2 _ c j ) ] j % g •- ._ \ VI▪ / \ 43.4 \ k / _c -a \ — .E @ \ / k E ` § ƒ \ Q 2 a) ® $ e o $ \ \ \ 9 \ \ ƒ \ / j } $ Co4-1 \ / 7 ± 0) Cu = v) = § .w \ C 2 k ° - G k CO -0 f 3 ° C E / ° Cl)\ Q 6 � $ •f 2 o e E E 2 �_ \ \ O % 00 % D V / o co 0 f $ 7 2 a) U 266 SOUTHWEST CRmDR LIGHT RAIL POET CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT r Q - _ . L ƒ / / \ aJ al 2 / \ 7 f t / 2 ^ s 2 u NI a 3 ¥ _ _ / § \ \ 2 \ Cu EC 2 2 \ � E g CU o E f E \ ( / ° 0 u a) u m 6 f_ C ( E ƒ 2 ƒ \ / VI VI - \ E ° \ L 0 % £ •W / - » d- E u 2 •z o '- 0_ RI N ® ° / § 4-a NI # % y o = s . £ e ° ® E u m e \ ti) t5 ± E k E F 2 3 • \ ta/ V) / / E 2 § 4 tn U 8 ƒ 2 E § / ƒ o \ C / 4-1 a) ® E ° Ts § R 3 \ m e ° \ k / 2 y o 0 ± \ • _ \ 2 o § p 2 $ ? / ° °ro CU % ? CD \ (Ni cu 0 0 8 \ / j \ \ C 5 U CU § -C / / � § = E E D m u 2 CO E o m e / / c c / E k z 2 -ro 0 _a ƒ \ $ y $ / % @ - / = 2 CO CO w $ o § ® a) C / f \ s a > 2 ƒ f y 0 @ 2 m 3 2 / / a) _� / — ) § / 3 / CU - § / @ / t U a m o = D & 2 ƒ \ 2 \ \ 0 E 4 t } 2 / \ = 3 y / 4 § G 0 \ E / 0 @ @ = f m u = - R > E 0 E G t f 1- % § / § E § \ 0 • ) ( o E e o 2 ƒ / = E / E \ \ 2 u u E / C \ 0 / Q t 0) V) o @ e . . . E . ' 2 3 k 3 E ° 0) } E 2 _ § k —C k \ \ : ± e & (5 - G & 0 5 2 Ce / 0 / / 2 CO / .E ' / £ 0 267 E. +-7' (N A / 7 \ / ® \ / CIA / 4-, \ 2 •s g E - ( k c § _ca.! \ = 3 = a) \ ° a) 0 0 S $ \ w 3 CD CU o 2 % & ¥ m I \ C E \ / _ = m = / / = CU ® o ® c — ( § % o _ & / vs 2 111 § f a) \ \ \ Cr) f co u E E § f 2 / / $ \ 72 % ) To • _ 0 § _ CCS/ \ 5 2 E E a ru ' R \ RI ( / k ( / = / = \ ¥ \ $ E $ ƒ co y $ 2 / t g c'' Z D / E � co E % s _ g E / ƒ \ • ƒ / 4 \ •\ ƒ = 0 / / @ \ 0 y — y k ( 2 % \ \ CO k@ 2 c » } / Q w e 2 ° = 0 C ƒ co \ } . 0 \ G 0 0 § / 0 k \ \ 4 o E 2 7 2 m b E E : q I �E I \ § \ E E R 3 2 C CV Os @ O z f % — B ) $ 2 2 $ 2 / o g • W ƒ / \ ( \ / MS 10 / ( .§ \ E % _ E — g = _ -o \ — 2 \ \ 2 > 2 co E L. e O 3 / V / % m t 7 / \ +-. C 0 \ { / / \ ) 2 E $ • a) 2 c k \ / E \ \ — u D s 0 '0 / = \ 0 § E / 0 f E 2 3 \ / B = $ § E j / C > e "C. ® \ % t \ vi c E c \ / / R \ \ f / 0 ,- k I \ a aj u e / � � \ ■ E c k / ' a) / % to ) _c / e o _ 2 \ q / / \ 3 0 E / / < q E 0 & e \ E z E c m o = in e @ G , , , , Z § g / E E C / 2 { $ 2 2 \ \ 40 W CC a) V / / CZ \ \ / q 268 SOUTHWEST CRmDR LIGHT RAIL POET CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT S 0 /\ c e4/ 2m \ QC JI >E / } / 73 D E 00 o/ � / \0 \ � � 5 0 / V no CV 2 � § = 0 2 co E \ m > @ \ E 0 f 7 m G 0 = @ E \ $ • 2 0 E E ) CU 0 _ ± \ t E > CU 5 0 • < W C •® s_ 2 2 ) 5 > / Et c 2 \ \ \ co @ & a e § a o « e y m / @ 0 7 \ § o m \ / \ c n I S / ■ a)> ¥ e @ E 2 4- CC 2 V 0 2 •/ » • \ E \ E % £ m e s _ ■ a 2 2 @ a) f 4- o 2 @ �. • § / / $ § / ' § q '> ° \ § m n S ƒ G o — f = \ \ 5 o m o . e D cill u ® = a m u = E 3 > = R a) a a > c 2 •--- = u E ■ / > _ % u 5 5- E E f © Q 2@ / = 2 ) q ' w = E > 0 k C C ƒ a 2 ' C f V 0 o o ® > \ % ® / j C C \ CU Q 2 / E 0 c % \ s J / • co = o -Z � ® _ % & .110 / _ / ® 3 5 g C / 0 \ co 0 k \ k E = 0 \ \ ° p R 0_0) \ E # ® n 4 _ E . o • co / - > / \ / / § k / ) e $ = u E 0 3 \ E @ t / a) E 6 / / •6 0 s E 2 / \ D ° \ c'' ± ° o ° 3 ® ® \ 5 2 7 \ CL & $ E co c \ / / / o E ? % / £ f \ 2 a) § • E G t G 0 W E 2 ® 0 0 k 4 § \ 00 y k .\ 2 \ 0 2 % @ \ \ S o / E \ LI) 0 / 0 0 / 2 % \ - $ co \ a) c E > ° -Z .� _ & 0 CO in \ K \ , , , Q > k / 0 \ E > w ( E { CT a) 2 / / > \ \ ± cc / U f , % t \ L f / 2 0 269 E. 4 \ / 1- +-, a ƒ / q QJ m Q CU \ / E / / 7 j \ } / c 2 0 \ _ 7 \ S / § 2 t E C < >-- _C 0 » U m \ t o \ 2 0 E y _ a) u e E @ E e 2 m ® E G = 3 3 / 4 2 / o -c / \ co cu cn ( / ( % m / ° E 3 � � C = \ § 2 g _ ¥ w 6 t m 2 n m r 0 @ t m e CD cr - \ = m 2 ® } co \ \ / y / _ - \ § / .2 2 E 2 / E c 3 g 2 n •t * Eco \ 2 E / . QJ _,..> \ 2 e e \ • m \ rn C a ` . / • -0 $ c o_ 2 3 c '� = —ro / § 2 e 'S 2 / ± OA 0 0 E g < E f / 2 ] \ 47, / / ƒ Z4 / I . q E e 0 / & § . E � -a E q k 0- 'I E0 2 \ \ ° { } L. 0 $ / c 0 0 G 0 > \ E u 2 — / c Q 3 / 2 0- 01 � / % / 0 0 \ \ / \ 0 k s — \ ® _ -o i ° 3 G 3 e ° c Q s / § \ S QJ a) % k f # / ® % § CO y 7 f o R 2 E 7 9 / / - ® & k E s y •■ f / ƒ \ C O § ) / e CJ = # u 3 6 / c @ — \ 2I 0) u / \ 7 \ ƒ \ / 2 t / 0 S2 \ � / 0 ƒ § 0 E » m E 2 m 2 u r, s ° 2 k E0 / \ \ / / / = ' / £ \ e m vi N o = x o e = C o ) / < % E # N U m a) U 0. (0 a .0 Q.. e . ra 7 C CO E c E / / § 2 o 0) \ § \ , , , Q m \ \ (/' 3 a) § / O § / / 0 CC H U e M , e 2 / 3 0 270 SOUTHWEST CRmDR LIGHT RAIL POET CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT § /co /0 \ ) / > = k = - / co E a)0 / \ \ CU 0 ® _ • / # f . - £ \ c } E & a # / E 0 - C @ f / m E L. = 3 4-' - s- 0 5 E m / 2 E @ u $ = 2 5 0 \ Cu a OD E u k > § o \ a 'c-) e c o 2 u / t > 2 / / - - ro j % C 0 - E } 45 C 0 > @ o § U ° a) } >• 2 m G a) C d Q \ = _c _ § C E 0 0 / 2 t j 6 0 '= U a) k \ \ 0 0 \ / / \ > / _ § C - c = 2 q E 5 2 go k E / \ \ / k c U Z ) E / CN / 0. 0 / " / > / @ § § \ E e k ® \ / = / \ 0 0 j r ƒ ro 7:2 ) \ \ a)▪ C a) y 3 J U) S e § .• @ \ { CO / 0 • 2 as -0 a) ra < ° a 0 o ® > ° a) E E e = 0 / ., § \ y n / = \ \ ƒ 2 / 2 \ 7 — CO. / a) u % 0 0 e e & » § t .f 7 \ \ x f / / W U \ / E 0 0. C cu - $ k } } E 2 ƒ E / \ E a) \ 0 m E + _ / • U IP •I § f 2 co$ 0- o o k ) \ •- / / \ ƒ u c 2 \ \ •— U \ / ƒ ts 2 ^ 2 / ) \ / . co E C E g a g m 2 C \ § \ 2 , , , \ / \ _ 3 ° E °C o f f k Ce k 0 H f m : k CO u 2 \ } q 271 0 L. N1111.' a) lc co 0 a.� � C d- a) o a72 0 en L v > cu p0 0 • +' - - o E co• cri a) L lc co 0 cu E a) O N co O O CO �, s u E — �_ o E 0 o O H 0 a, °° +J • tat c 0 N o + + +, dr N L ,� U to p c a) C +�, L ca 0 ++ 0 ° a) -p a) to •> N E C v a) *' °a y N > °' 71 v C a) c - u a) E U 4-co Cto E u c an E 0 o +� L o v -o v = c �n +, 7 3 += z CO a+-' c � co v p coC v, 0 73 N -p H 1% • 1 0- N O a) .0 L pU co c +L+ C a) /� a) co 7 U 3 vi U a) 61 +' a1 (a c fV L v Na) U L O tvli a) LII I _ a) p �1 Y O C '0 a) us O +-+ C E C > v, CO Q C L +� +' O LJ -0 ca U 0v, C E L C COla 4— a) TS U a1 1:2o a) CO v,- o_ CO C >, - N cpo C +N• 0 0 E O ~ E if1 > — •00 � ca O N 0 N N COrI3 v_o - a e C ° �i 0 3 v v _a a .) O 73 OOC Cc■ cc N Em CO v, t =s �, an �0 8 o —)o 0 +, c -0 -p Vf a) - p Y > U + — Q U 0 a) co rt S- W WCD CO > 0as Q a) O CD -0 a) O L > L L L a) +0., 0 Q V co co D d L 4- > a) -o 0 4- ca COL • a) CD ago � Cbe = v � v 0 W i O 0. o i c C C i N 0 L 0 > C L Q CO 0 0 N CD t en 0 COM > a) ° u '� E CO (0 U o N � aai 0IX NE O L +J C c -0 c +' t C 2 • E o t -C 3 C a) v; v a) v CO c a) coLo H E U a) +' c +. U tio a) N a) a, a) c U +-' 0 v, c a)m0° ofa Cr) N u•, -0 t t 0 U N a, 0 0 = N 0 v 0) +, 00 = I— I— 0 0 0 U C CC a U CO V) 0) (-0 a) H a) ai N .0C a) 0) 3 3 �, W uv EE v EE Q c Ea) v o ° CU CC I- U I- 4 U 0 272 SOUTHWEST CRRIDORLGH RAIL POET CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT o LO / >- -0 > y A :Ti ? m Q % Ti.) .' l ra L = 2 ® e = 0 } 0 0 -0 3 ▪ W / 0 / - \ o c 0 \ $ 0 \ \ ? c = e - 2 / / C E k k > 0 5 E q I = . 2 % = E q \ 0 / 0 c > - \ u -0 / \ 0 WI 4 � • / m \ c 0 0 To f / 2 t - 0 ƒ > / ® t 2 / @ £ I . / / / 2 ® ~ 2 / 2 0 § t 0 3 0 E E 7 1.-,,,, 0tn 2 � \ C 0 \ k k IP Cli ■ e ® / .03 E co / \ C E k / 2 k > ._ \ # 2 > 2 , m & e e a g 0 / \ § $ • / / I E a) 0 - # } u 2 2 m s = 2 E > q % E E 0co ƒ 2 / 0 0 7 $ en 0 w 0 � 5 E > e u / g E E a) Q Z E 2 % 'E / 2 0 0 [ \ m w £ CU ® 0 \ § % 2 ° _0 3 2 -0 >▪ \ - -0 ®a) ® E E 2 \ u ? a) ro eta / 0 - k / - 2 $ % w $ co / \ / # ƒ # Q § % " _ D f / ƒ { = » C 7 q \ $ / / \ = E 0 3 0 o 0 $ \ & o ` u R _0 ci 0 \ CO_0 % k a) d E £ ± CI C u c CO a j CO \ $ % / CU 0 \ 2 > / / E ( ° ° CD= E 0 E •+7, ■ § m ® E > E / / / S / C 2 2 0 . ( u \ 7 \ c a ® 2 CO , , , > / ƒ / 2 G / 0 o E "1:3 2 2 R > 3 / 0.0 { 2 c e ± I- e = .� m & / E % 2 3 0 ƒ ._E \ / CC / 0 273 a; lao 0 • +_+ -0 co U 7 l-1 L •V U ,C O O `� 0 C O a a no Z C a -I a) Q aZii 0 on O N a ca Ln E 4) a o2S 01 7 t 0 C O +, `I on Y _c C C C U Cro a) -D 0 E O -0 E co L1 L O O O) C31 U• (0 0v v > "0 co on a1 0 0 LD oA C ut C C +� to E Q N C O C +J 7 ,X '> O O U ,} C O C a ro +� v m 12 E v o u� E v E 0 = + E cn Q a C C a (n a C 0 o L a 0 C ` a 0 a +., O o LCO CO aC) > C E a -a a O 4+ v E = __ a N C LA 0 a N U Q U 0 0 L O z > C u 7:5U Y �` Q f6 L 7 O L a-.+ >� N +-i C C m +, L C Ln +. +-, CO a (r) co 0 0 ca 0 L to a + = C a a O '+7 L7 O C C •i a a a ro 4— E aa)) 00 a) •- (o u C CO +�, •x • + o E - C a E > - N N +-, fo .c C Y S a N Q a L j a (0 u O N 'O o0 co cn 03 co V z = a o U a) ut vi O +�.+ v u C F � o 0 ,L Q oA .+: O d1 1 (o a i U +_ 4-+ 0 C V) +, t a U (n U i C vI L a) U a > a O -0 a) a of ca V a) Y oA a i U C C a) Q _C 0 O N co 0 CoA a) Q O 15 CO a CO CU t ° DCL 3 +� a 0 0 (6 CL Y Q- > +- 0 � a) a) C a) .�; o C L > > ' LE O D U +' C y_ OA u . E a) a) Ci O0 a " I a) a) N U O t ++ "0 E Eo a) 0 a " oZ O E 40' 73> p C OC l6 C C Q v a +`n-' i y O +O-' Q a) o2S +� ••.)= ',7 ,_ VI 0 E v L o\ >` v m C �) O -0 a) E N +� O Y Q N 00 i d o - a to E Y (o �° n `� L. -a +, Ca c m ) E E > N C O a a) (o 0 +`n Q a) > p ca O o a 0 a U v E C a }' a) °J E U E o°AA E E U Ca) co oaA E � -i�+ a a0 ��-+ N OC (n dr a Q c.) C C on E CO 0 'Q C E v C a CO I.- oac 00 U 0 cn d 0L vi tn a 4J v 0) E - 0 E L b.0 3 w E a +� �' �' L- . • . . 0 E u +'' a a o ff , ° F- U CO H U H 0 274 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RI PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT 4-, 2 (N j 0 > / a E a) g 2 n . a) t a) a) C E / a) 3 o g f 7 E § 1- j a) ) § E U � k % o c c f E •— F I co C - E _ o co / § % / co co a) 0_ \ al V) 0 § •\ _ / I E f / *-67, \ z j a) 0 q » \ % \ ro % & \ k } F m o C CO o c / C § P I . tla +4 E 4 2 a) E § e g 2 \ / u0 cn 01 ) k E 2D 73 \ \ / k C 0 o C m k a) a- % y E • g E a) o % - / c a) E OA 0 ' C g = - » y C o M # a) f • § % = \ = 2 g ? t © ¢ ® CD C 2 — / -c 2 N \ 0 � \ k q { '\ ƒ @ _ z 3 co = m = (N $ k \ ® _ E & E o t >. g § co / C y — a) o a) a) Q z 7 O \ ± $ # % % 2 \ E D 2 2 U • : g § / ( # $ / \ ) • 2 \ . \ � = \ C ) \ o E 2 ® § 2 E E / ° s \ a -0 To \ \ § \ \ C m y c g • f $ e t a) \ E u 0 > g • § 0 - { E Ni ( / \ f _ \ \ / / 0 - CA c Q a k � P m / y e m .m . u _1 u 7 a) W \ E n & @ e E @ 2- U o ƒ E @ E « § 5 m > E / o § § 0 0 0 0 \ ) % § ƒ f \ \ 0 ■ 2 § 2 \ E E 3 U •W " 2 CO v m q q U 2 +-, E \ C z C E E ) _ , c c f C � \ , , = § •.,7, = E = e E 7 0 a) E \ d - ill E \ 0 \ ƒ o ƒ f f 0 Ida w y U - I— U e .5 2 0 275 0" c0 i.. c) v, N O 0 3 a) ro a.... a) q i a) �_ v C E a) a) c co " v a) o �J. o ° 41 3 >> u E rz s ° t (.' •- k O O U QJ a-'_c Ein a) N a > c c E rn a) U +, E -= -Z c C o GJ 0 c E O O a t Nc a) E o U +r VV) �o -C C C C 0 p 40 O +' 0 CO a) 0 N ro E U O _c RS vi+.+ i to a) 3 •W ('3 V) U f6 ++ O a) a) I . I . a) Q1 U _c i C a) fa }' i N CA i co N O >.• � p N 0 a) C to U a) r/) �. +J} , v) o_ .+••, Z 7 0 01) C -0 L C1r, co L O +- 0A I . -0 Z N a) .O rLa >. . f0 %. ■ �p C c co CD U co c >` - `) i 4- L • a E - a) w no C (i) E °' v > _ a) v 00CO si) a) 3 O U E a) 0 I—L. v) r% a1 >' O CO E i }' -0 U 0 C ro Ec i _c C m — > 0 0 ro +' O E (1) L c - O 'O tib (D E N 0 N v aci (N U U C i .N ' Ili C I Q O n U ra E N fD 0) Y a) I U Z U n c E >, > N 3 c c v, o o C 0 N i L - o U C h0 > > _ t Q av r0 L OU G.) a-, C i , L O 41 +�-' h 0 mC U U -0 N r - p co ° v tel N Q rn �+ LU Tr3 0 O i ?� Q O O C Q -,�, a) 110 i1:3 > co U �O D ria m 2 Q) (I U • L o6 Q a) U CL C > _ �� a) raa) o Y > - U v CO 0 • rz ++ L. .1 v -0 a > U ?� E ai a) n co ▪ 2 c a) a) C o 0 o C +-- c L 0 a1 06 0 ° hN0 o a) a) 4— 4- 4- b.1 C c E O > C 0L p +�-) C 0 E c N N U C O O i ° v COro 'c I . 2 • m O u c c a) E E 1� > CO N N c a C U C s s a) 4J o v, L ) rn N 0 v v a) a) cc v, N C O rn +, LT) U cc cc _ 0) U >i ° +' c n v C a)vi c COcB > +; c — Q. v) E o . to E v W CO U) +▪ ro f0 t 0 C U 0 I I— z o +, v) a GC 1— U H .c 0 276 SOUTHWEST CRmDR LIGHT RAIL POET CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT c - / C (N : p a) ® \ co / / : e � @ \ k LE 0 o \ / ¢ yCL \ / R 0 2 co $ CU E / \ § \ a , ® £ / 0 E \ 0 » 0 ° / 2 \ a) a) \ / in I \ vs g a) 2 \ / C — � f t 0 aco \ \ 9 $ / \ Dvs / / ƒa) ƒ ro \ 7 / § \RI § \ tri 0 c •s c / co k C / / 0L / & 2 2 7 _ e E 2 0 o E % ro \ a) a al esi / / / E % { 2 a) \ C C E G E ± \ E § q tn E E r g o & 3 C m \ @ 0 a g f o \ § C \ v co 0 ° ) (N •rTs m } CO° 2 \ vs / CO / $ / CL / # 2 E a) 0 - k > - 2 0 - 4 / k 2 a) E Cl) ° C CO = E -0 \ { ` . % E $ & a) ¥ \ a) a) / \ cu * 3 ƒ E f / ° % o E _ al % 0 ) 0 @ Q \ $ 2 f • -0 > 0 CL) t $ o & % \ ° _ — f § 5 \ \ } \ * U 0 / \ f \ \ R E 2 0 0 � / / V3 cc' \ \ / / 7 c C ® y — .. u 2 Q m E f e G 0 m > E u o f g & \ § q t \ 2 5 ' 2 ■ E ® E § a)CS \ / 0J 42 CU-"0 2 \ C - / \ \ / � / a) \ 3 % co & / E c e © £ e a) @ 2 \ y = I e % ƒ . o $ E , , a) ' t o 2 C c * E * R § 2 / o - o / 0 / w CC a) E / % / / p z co m CU 0 I— LI H 3 H H . 0 277 cp §4 3 � m § cio _ r [ / „... ozs ƒ ) / / / / crs k \ ° C a TO = t m > \ 0 o \ / \ » E $ CD \ 2 k ` . 0 0 2 @ ( / E § 73 0 o \ u 2 ? E k = \ O 1 0. \ CO e a) a ) 2 = \ •/ \ / / ) 0 ad / E ® & e 2 2 / \ \ » 2 \ \ Q) \ 7 } § CU C • k / 2 ® o @ c E / CO \ 40 - / \ ' 0 o E / ° g ) 2 g 2 -z ) S / ± 5 0 \ 0 Ca = u E u G 0 o c C g 2 E 7 / @ g \ \ 2 -0 / q e _ LE c\I •- fi \ / 0 f \ t \ a t @ s m E 2 3 g f ® s e c / 4 § / '2 \ o E \ Ca k / \ 2 2 f $ \ 7 o co O 2 g c » m E ƒ CO 0- CL 2 0 a 2 ca L' 0 / 2 ct >•• 2 f R ƒ ƒ / - = ) \ § Cl) Q 6 a 'a) — a) % y / 2 0 CU 2 § _ 0 § / @ c § ° a) LL % § 2 _c o E \ / Q * % g o L_ a) # E = CC E CU . » » » \ $ E - E k 7 C / 2 k ■ u @ E 6 a) k % \ I • \ \ 0 E o Q = § R pD # m § s G = \ 03 \ '7 0 0 e G a) C E e § \ § C k CD Qco 0 2 / ° \ W \ .5 u u COCL \ 2 = o % = e E E / • - Ili ± CL \ / 2 \ 0 ° e 0 LD g 2 H U H 3 U 278 SOUTHWEST CRmDR LIGHT RAIL POET CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT E. • y a) $ / % L.. L ® / 2 0 ._. 4,..„ f CU > ii 0 ( +-) \ Q 2 / o J E f / / / \ § E k,, / \ \ \ R d E Co• i3 7 aJ / D 2 CO CO 2 0 ( \ k C / ) ris 111 k 2 f s ( a) @ V e a) t k / * co E CO \ 2 E o g V1 �. - k o ® \ e / . C > _ _ \ • \ / m t 2 • 0 e ƒ / 5 Z • Co E f # / \ { ■ E ® / ƒ \ Co C I— k 0 E \ U / \ A o 2 ) 7 ® \ 2 - o = � ; u E y 0- s m k / % $ ƒ R / V:, o o U = _ > .§ e c 5 > 5 C - ? S 2 k \ / ) CO \ Co k § \ \ (N \ % _ & / _ co > \ n % CNI \ Q 3 & 2 - 0 = 6 Co Q § - in 2 § \ 0 .} C & _ = R o y 2 W ƒ .» g - i E § k A / f \ 0 ° \ / \ � ro - a) k k 2 : / +., .. = e ° CO C c 2 a # � E § / CD Cll 7 / ro / _ s U Q O / / ƒ \ \ \ / 5 § 3 CO• 2 0 Ln k a) a) \ ± / / / : o 0 L. a m \ p E o a — n e 0 C 2 0 Q -w, .t; o E E O } \ t . ƒ CU u m G E u ▪ E 7 •/ / \ f 5 E 0 E 2 U = § p � \ - / \ co" / > \ < \ . < E CL = c 2 0 E a) ■ c a) o CO CU = E ¥ } e / e @ 4-.) , , , , • 3 \ � / E 1:10 * E ° \ C $ E o a) E E \ ± s- > z E 73 / \ / o),- o ° e E 0 Q 2 e } / U H H . u 0 279 +, N CO N i.. - co v, >' L C L > O N 0 4)CU } I . C . C V (13 E i U 006 0 Z N ✓ O co U L �'� -1-., .0 O ut Q 7 d U l6 '— co ' O C L top c a N C Q co ii i a, Q -0 cu 0 +' w -0 +'•' 0 co W N X v; C as aci L c co aci +, ami = v, QQ c Q co c •— cu c U 'c c 0 0 E in - V cu LJ `^ o C co C 4- C., 0 • °p CD ate` C vi- +v., > m ° Q L v, •E- via) C C > ba CCo j ., U co (o `� to c0 a1 • `� C aJ -o 0 co c N >. y +� • -0 t a°p ° Y to L U v, o c +' O U _ L vi - c ° *' a o v �, E . 0_ v v) v s • a a1 c) v• ° ° > o > U 0 cc v 0 a a; s 0 x 0 ° C L o O �' vl N c tin '0 t Y U Q CD U .2 U C � c v a co +' ro v v > . 0 co C co +-.� ++ C 73 d '+", L too L C L N E ° 12 Y V U v U an 0 } c v c 3 ° a) c O -a co U •cu a1 c }, 3 O a1 C 'C v, o v, c U c 'el)) O •L O > cu ,- L �O 3 a1 U n m ate, co N '� Q U Q o O Q o +-' C c _a ao 7 `0 0 7 cco Q j 7 •�O 4- a-.+ +' O O 47, ,_ O o o Q �, 0 0 0 ._ ° ° 0 0 o U L N _0 v, _a _a SD +J 0 C 0 ( .2 a1 > O C 4J co c a) co co co co aJ 0 ca r3 C a1 L O a) N L U c6 c a) tY7 i O c C o ° v, C '+, C C 0 = a� v, N C f0 a1 c " p) +J 41 +J U v U +J N �o cE cu coo -0 >' -o " . U L C VI - U VI -0 v, -0 7 U L U V, t� p) VI 4; O N .O O N ° O +� avi p CU 0 7 CU l31) OO v U re c 0_ 3 U tot CJ oU -0C7 c_9 , z L U U dcci > Q Et V, U 0 Ll • • iii, 0 • 0_ • E • • • • • • • • • in • N • • CD co •O v a)Q- co .0 >` Y Q 4.0 +0+ Q. C C as D CO CD CU SZ2 M (15 4J C C 0 +- 2 C O uA U be A� v Q +�O +�� v v l3.0 c N Q Q' W aJ O ° C O a o � _ + co -t c fY H 0_ ap cca T2 E U n o E co E L , a) L C E U C > E E co o f co N a + a, o L o o ° > 0 0 ° 0 E 0 Q Z D H U > H Q U d U > U U H E o a) V ° c U o 0 o o o o CI) ' MI • Co), 0 0 N 0 0Or C O +-' Uut \ \ \ \ \ \ 1.1.1JD �"�L M ti:) tD O O = E \ \ \C N N N 0. O tN 0 280 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT co „ ce. co I V IP W ....01 7:5 L, +L, >. To -� C"vi c To as (11 _ of cu P bA +' C CA 'N C110 E - C_ Y > 0$ V O C O C M � D Ly O • +-- C iii, a1 a1 t C 0 C +0., c6 C a) Q- O a) E '} i - •— - C d O -0 co +, x co O CO—c6 + co +� ca O 4C 1 + a) •- s- U v o n X m N ;a v OJ v) a) c c do u v; u .� o ru �' > C > ns p . C a, v v *' N - O OA } a) O a) +� � O Y O u Q C 0 a) I co N C 'p O = +-,-, U vi O a - - N s co co U � i v bA _c CU o E LI0 3 a) ' - N ) a) C a) ; U N a) v + +� OZS O '— a) N U >. 0 -O cB / -O a) N '(p 110 N co Y 73 aJ o O O O + +� 7 co U 4; > C O Oro mo SZ Lis C O O 7 O U U C N +_ i C a) •E U m E C n — n :p S2 a ra C > N a1 0 0 p CO a) CO O > E > Q O c6 u C (o -w p . ut a) +� C '+� SZ i O N •� p coo a) 00 +� O a) D O O Q 0 *' v CroO ro -p co ra �, f6 _ +.+ U U of > O a) t SZ i 4 00 = Q ,� -p 'N u C V C -p N SZ Q SZ co .; O N 7 40 O O C v O a1 7 a) L v + 0 0 a) t sZ i i V) CU -t -0 � c—° Y O a 3 4— +' C > c `CD U N C o U •'UTD °� o c'�o E� v°1i a) C .� L ++ C p y, aJ c a) C N 'a a) •- > a) co a) f6 `� v N o v Y C 3 v 2 Y Q dA a a) +.) SZ a) — c0 O _o to .,•.-.,' 4.' O Q- } +O } C C +� C i _ +�-J +' +.., +•+ 7 C U L C O +' a) a) - a) •— U �0 3 'v, ° as O C O C 7 p N C +� L p Q O i O 3 O O p O i L L — p D C c _0 E O 0A _0 d o O -u p u = > - `~ C _o O +-' N -o 00 O O i c�6 O •" 't:70 O co C c0 tV C a1 "' a) >, O o_ C as o C >� ro - • NO 3 a) •— h VI 4O 2 a) O C U ut i C +-.' C v, O C Y -0 '} a) „O (,6 LO >� a) i +p • C C C cs d' O > E Q O > O E a) N CD > vO, 04 p i v 4— E O +, E +� O u O _ N Y ,— (...) ,..) 0_ c • o a) a) *„ L ., u v, cu tin `a a) 4s-2, Y • u � Ln -0 0 v>'47, o a) '7 b. p '4=, >' S? C ++-, a) C v0i a) a) a) C v, 0.0 4- O U L O 41 cp v a) a) U C N o�A a) CD —) `~ E • O O 7 O p -O 'j O v O O a) 3 v u O u aJ aJ a1 O v O u p Q p — U U vs U 2" CQ C7 CCD U u d o C7 U v cn -a Q- c L7 —1 Cr a) U o z a>i C7 -0 U v cn a) Cr -a N • U • • • • • CO • cv • < -0 • co • v • • co • co • a) • • • • +_ • a • -O • E • co • a) • CD Co +->•. i 0- C O D 7 u Cp I C T > C O U 41 -0 -t � O C a) U a) a) coo O• O O C O Q U 0- a) m a) a) a) i + v a) O > w > O M (1) v1 L ++�� a) v, Q L oN V) ° E roo 2IX E E v, v, E N E CD > > E > E E aC uco , E O E- N110 -0 o o 0 o u o a) o � Q I— QU a < U U < F � U a. 0 E a) N o N N N N O Co O 0 0 0 0 0 O N N N N N N C O \-I ,\-I m 0000 0000 w r-I ri r-I ti r-I r-I N N N N N N 0 281 .1- - _ M v v) �, °A iU > (C5 tw •VC—, O 7 (a = V) a) c ro 0 db v vi �,, 3 0 c� o ai Y u LE U O O O C la a) (6 C Q (a co N v C ▪ p OL O CO O 4J �, CC0 O - -0 O OQ O O C = U 2 > Q 'U v) U °- ami (a Y a O m ' to *n O �° t a)) L O a) U > Q = v O L.L �) VI Q L Y S •E L (6 op ro •C OL co a) V7 >, Q N O a) - - C _a in U 0 U — 4- h0 0- p La -O U 0 (cf.)) a) -0 w O U m 0 C Q" C h.0 c4= ro vi 'a) Q +, 7 t aJ L L +' C 4- L bA V L `a N co c L Q (a m 4--+ (a a) VI (o vs ro (Uu a) (a 4- 5 O ui X U " v, L_ C O > a) (a -0 a) 00 +, C >1 L L a) C U U i (a O a) ut •O a) +' = L 4p CJ vi C a) L �+ 4J (a L a) a1 a) ID a"' a) O L C O V U • O }' ate, to O p = O -0 v, •— vi L cu +� Q to ca O H C O v v 0 O (6 L �--� U Q L L a) O >` E C L V1 - +� CO 0 a) (a 0 C > C >` _c U U C ++ _ oA O 7 vOi L oZf N aJ 7 03 Y O 0 -o L -o Q a) n a) a) +' VI L N -c a) U a) U 'O ' _ +' 7 N C '+, O (o y. ca t a-, a N 0 a-, a) of O a) +, O L L La U O C om( �, , L a) Q L +) +J C C a.) O +� `n 4-' 6 +' U `ro Q as .N a) +-, 0 x V) 0 4_, V) U 0 ,r, N L a) " > (a Q C ( Y U a) C > N L v N +, C a • +, +, _0 C Q a 0 o C > a, Q —o u Q +' +. 0 — a) I. 4- v u v u O .) = 00 +, ` p 2 7 . i i) a) E vi O N . OO v 00 C 7 O p f6 L U N 0 COLU -O a- O O O - a) O a) L a) L L O O O w L (a co .u" (a .—.(1) (a a) VI -a (a Q L -0 L L C L O .- O O (a > U 0 (o in O 'n V, O (o V, V, -O C L (a Q O C 0 da 4- 7 4- 4- (a La (o L E (o C N t C CO Li) C C Q C C Q C > .� C 7 U) +, +, •� N (13 C LO C C C CO O C E 0 C `^ N L 0) (0 O Q L (a O O O N O a) .v, 0 N O L O 4_, to a) v a) a1 +� (- a) a-+ L CU }r ++ .LL) a) L L VI U (a (a +-• N t U no V) C Vf Q b.0 L U L 7 a) Q a) N U V U U U N 0 U O U C U v C !n v) a) L C C a) (a a) 0 cc el C U 4":1) CS t Q 47_, C C a) w C C >_ C a) C C U a) N C a) = O Q U O a) O i C +� N 7 1 O p C a) +' C O a) p a) • O O L O O p C O +, U C ' � C7 � O DC7 o C7o (n as o � o (n � v � Uz oUU �, U U � " C C7 .EU ami • as • Q • 'C • Q • U • N • Vi • +, • ut • U) • • > • • • Q • • u_ • • (a • (o • LU • • c0 4-' a) C Q 7 (a w4-.0.0 .O• dA O C o m L a � C I C L a C L -t p p +, a > a) (a O 0 (o a) O +' u, Q- Q NC + L L .0 D a O C 0 : CQ — m 0 L 0.0 z ao a _a ,- O p .o = D E s E C v HO Suao - HO HO 000. 2 ou E a) N N N N N 0 N O ( B O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N N N N N N N C cn 0 N CO N w r-I N N N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ en a N N N N N N U 282 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT s- 1 co 4.,v .... :.-CN a1 V bc° ra 1:2 '� +' >, co - `� E I• by I a a1 +-' + C Cil - L 'v, 12 O tv um N ca v >' O fl_ > C .� L a) O 0 O a) +•' C a O a1 > ,n C sZ CO p E v, +, Q o N - +, v O I (o i ra ra 4- > C -o 03 C L v, +_+ > a) C -O 0 sZ E o -O bA i u ;^ ca 0c v, bA 63 40 0 N 0- a) - E O L1 > 'c DE O cu o 2 ca +, . H o 0 co ca O sZ b�0 a) O +, a-+ Vl v i i i i y/ CD Qa) o > U U (n + N to 2 L E O O _a +, N _ H a) a) v cc iii m SZ 0 N m _ ,v, o ca o ca o > O C 4 +? ' a) SZ +, SZ O m a L C • • C a) +, a) `� 7 C a) — E N +, O N N N 4O o o CO a)C O 0 '^ II 0 a) C — ca ., a) c o aa) c U, v, __ C v P ^ +�, _ Ca co +' u a E c vs 37:3 v U L }, L a) C u 7 0 V ba Q co v C -� C 4O .0 a) a) a) i C a) E CD d . 0 C > co ro 0 I O Ta a) to — i IZ _ bA bp 0 c C ra C o c 2 coC co t C ccI• `- v I• E C ca el H u +' E v CD as Ca f6 O u C C 0 O i a) v, a) i •+, v, cc _c _c > At (I) —▪ " H -0 > E aa) o a) +� v •c u Ea) 7 ° v (-) " a) o c v O O a) C +• v, ,} t Y 0 a) O -0 — co " 0 2 — c + -- v co >' _• o I o a) c co = CU a) ,_ v) 0 ,-, v) (0 o c Q- C - E c to C �, 3 > (� L +, N v fv v O ca a, o_ CD u m u> caLE$ 2 v ca -0 N C C o a, a — 3 = o +, a C +_, '^ m C O v a +� bA bA +, } > +, L7 E E E o CD C +� o v — ca +, O E c E c +, c +, O Ca a) c O a-, CD a) a t 2 O 3 CL ' ' — aA = +, +, > +, E +� o Y 3 0 cn o c c a) O E ao +, + ca a) a) -- . C :+_' o C v No i ca i C O O vi i 7 +� a) +C C ca 0 E C _0 coo -0 O O o i > L [6 [6 -co co o > O O N cc C +, H co +, _ N 4- �O a) O IZ CO v, +`, •c U sr) co co C - ' a) `~ C +, N bp a) 'a ut 2 co ., (o C N +-' i C i O v C C i C a) D a) L O C ,n C C C C C s >� N C O O a) O _ E N a1 c6 O O +' +.' a) a) co O La a) bA + v +' +' +J v — O _ +, N + i O v, O O CD +, C + c v, >. Y SZ i u C N aJ i vs v, v, = v, i ca a ca to +� 2 + N + u v, i v, i O O U aJ E a) C •- s? +�, a1 a1 a1 C O a) C +� _was tZ _ U a1 a) C a) a) 'L 0 7 0 wc O j 6 c 7 7 3 7 a) 7 tZ ca = -O h00 +� a cC) Q sZ C 3 U co cc J cn U a) 0 o C7 c _ sZ C7 C7 a) C7 _ o o E " v ca c ca �' a a C7 Cr o c� -0 • Q • • • • U • t • co • v, • • H • • > O u Q C w ,} ca 2 co v co G O 'a .— Q • a) • u • N Co C — a a) u D Q C 0 o O O O -t CCD a) I . O U co O O C C +:., I. a) L o +, i L O Q U O +� 41 6 bC0 U 6 CC +, C N S - Q E C U a•-' L C V +, N C c6 C '5 E v, bA O a) ca +' to O C 5 H 21 H HH< U 2 Z < 2 Z < E a) cm No o N N N Co O O 0 0 0 N N N N N C L\ r\-I I\-I li) w \M M Tr If a T 0 283 (0 N i.. co "'a- C O > O -o q i.. O �' a) i CU +J O O O o w 0 • Y O h +� oC 0,6 O N o U Q co - O 0 Nto C ca H co vi p �, N co O a) c > >'• a co eg vs 7# a) cu ` a) C2 L CO L J +� O 0 - -a N E v) U -- -- U .v) m E _ o6 U O 0U -0 CL c-6 0 -0 O U a) O al c�6 .c as a) E a) co C N co c-I U LI L _� cc > o_ co a1 U to tk no co m O a) +� o m O C U .E C2 N vs v) (�6 c I ca coU .E LO a) CQ � -0 C v, v-, `n co X$ C j.•' I . o 00 E •U L L aJ >• +' C v) C C= O E C U +' a)ow U U a) a) L �'ad o cu U L00 0 = o C N (n = 00 CU Y C aJ `1 H N �} U ++ N p •+-, 0 a) .- i C '^ co <� m V) O a) > v a c o ' 00 coL +� o */I E C2 v H OL �, v U O '+, L L OL '} L 'yr — f6 +' co C N co C C 7 aJ h co CO CL l0 7 LLL O 7 U vOi U CL co U U CU +� a-+ Q dA N O -6 t `— co C - 7 co 7 0 — O C •C CL o U Q U bA a) O 'O 7 b.•C U > ,_ E E ?) 'O E C E U a O a a O 2 —^ Q1 c •L O V) E +�-' 7 = ate Q � � L v, CD c •a) Cad = v -0 a) L � o E v FD = C V, v r E C o O CU C ns C i• °; +' a) - +, o ro V) a) a) o o v O v n o ;_' n oo .o a) v O = O -o +, o > °A a, 0 o N O a' to c 03C cu cowY O N _0 a) COo4- -a cn ca L a) co L ate-' N co co v N +J 42 -O CD Q _, a..' Q a•' co > cn C C N +03 U., C2 O ut Cl cn V) co O V) V) E U L L L L L L L co a-•' V N L L C L O a) C C ro C E r•' C C V) C U N L L L H 0 .0 0 0 0 0 O L L L O O •— �O L — L N O , O O •— co OCo v O O O m O O a O tU) N 'a O +� a) } EIC, E U U '+� O •+� N V) v- V) V) V) V) V) 4- 4- +' 4- V) a) V) C utVI C i i VI 0 V) i i C L L i (I) i N i C ,110 C 0 m C C 0 Q) N N i = > O +8 = O = u ›+ O O a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) O a) O N — a) 4- .O O >O al 7 7 O 7 7 O C a s a U U U U Uccccc U a a a a UC 3 0 > U > L J C7 C7 n C' I— L- 2 > C7 — C7 — C C a) o a) O O O O O O a) O a) 7 0 a) 0 -o In In OC If, cc U U U U U U OC c/) CL' N U I— u i i i ' i i i ' i i i i i i CD C6 Cl a) D E Lon I co C C O O �C O to O +O O +' - O C O c v O O ^ aJ ro aa) co ,G i 0 CO -C O i) i 0 i -c 0 m 1 a) i Q- a2 ° 0 0 _° ,o U -° ` m _o o c +' o Ct L U t 0 C t u — t u t t u co E Eo_ E 00 O +' 0A O 0 0.0 0 +' GO 0 +-, E Z C - C t '� v) 7 'cU N C 'v N o 'a) v) LO (C6 o n3 > a) a z Q 2z < a z Q v) z a CL J (••) cn H I— E 01 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C a—I-I a\-1 N Tr CO CO ...... w a--I L-1 r-I ai r-I ai N CK I\f1 Il Lf1f1 Il Lf1f1 LSA Lf1121 0 284 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT ti i.. CO CO n.- a) a' i i 73 C a) �1 aO+ 4 7 L CIA CO > _ 'Y CO U CO O a' C ?� > Y ca C +' > LI CD > E •Y = v 'L o O as +_. +, CC pQ C Y • 'Yco ▪ p- +-, C 0 cO a) CD C i ccO) o co C MI 73 al blO V' 0 ro To v) C C N U E a) t a) +., v '+� �1 c -o o — c c ro = D U > c `° co c , +- co +' C X 0 O OE L, a) • O ' a) YO N Q cUO a) C C (o N Q v) ++ Q co 'CD CIA 0 Q a C CD 06 v Q- c 2 0 U N c a' +'a) _O v CDCS > U C E . a' a) Y C LL C a' CS o i C 7 C >. Y a1 C c_ 'CS 7 bA C a) r6 U a) _ C U s- of •Y > ✓ C UCD UA N Y +., v N ro a' co a' o 0 o � a' Q Y U L ro L C Q .I- Y Y U i p Q O v O U • u 4- C i `� +' O •� C v CCD "O CA 0 Q c 0 , ra >. w o > a) ca C• i - a' O fO w Y a) O a' ?� v U �) > L I i `� O O a' CD `- C 'a C L C ▪ U C v aJ �; N U (n + -0 > o O L c6 Q $ C U a) asw Q CC i C (n O o v Na) Sao a m O o v ',° o Y .N o ° ;° N O to n 4- Y C c •L CQ [a (Ca a L 2 2 p E E Vl C E5 VI C a' as LE L .- .- c D = D Y L C an C .> co Y O a) C Ul L (a C L _ Y v O O O C O O o00 0 (77:50 0 0 0 C p a' i 4! 7 7 Q C t 0 — O O Q U Q O o C r6 p Y U a' H O Y U — ro c C O `^ O Q co Y S - co +7. co ro Co -0 Q a) YO t aJ CD v _a In a' C C N C Y V Q 3 p N N O In C a) _O v1 U vl v, ro i LA co ca c Y tx0 .0 aJ C O O c O 0 O N O `n +' coi O O o o O N _c +' •O O C 'O `~ cO C A +' CM U O on N L O N O CA N t6 vl a N co Y — •— ,0 ,n O ca In ca cn C Ta O C '0 -, O .Ln C v+'i U) U) U) a' = > cu CO v, a) a) O t C a' T2 a) p i C a' a) '+' oo +' C N C a' _ a' _O Q a' O a' v a' a' C O N is O i Cu- CU1 7 vi a' O a) +C C L i a) OQ a' C a' >+ a' Cf •� c o v-) Cf2ClCl CJd0 , aniY a' a' ca o c4- c °1 O L c 0 ,may (� V — L a' D U 0 CM _ J Y — CD — V) C7 U Q — Q CJ U V .(1)5730 (o 0 OC O73 C CD I I I I I I I I I I CC +-, 3 Q U I I I I I I I I co Q U U Z Z C _cv o o m d O O z Q vv1 U C -t +., a' I z a' N N c c >, O O ro O C > 4 L v a) ro = L O YO •C ro ca O a) +_, O +_, co ,v1 C = Q N 2 a Lt Q _ o _., E a) a) E ra E E t E 'u c t '. +' > C -O z i U i CIAO I C i0 2 Q U I— I CO Lr) U d _1 U > U a O v v)) E a) No o N N N N N C O o O O O O 0 C N N N N N N N C %\-1 N O 0000 N r\-I w \ \ \ \ \ \ N Ct a 111 t.0 t.D .D LID VD 285 N - - - 0.) CO ro o , \;,,r. . a p L a v a a, o o n } O L O C Cu L_ +, +' pp Q a a ° Q1 c u N a ° C O Q v •- L a - L •C +, -0 v 0 0 +, '� o C - N 4,-,, a) - > U 0 •- v c RS V, -a it' t — a — 3 >. C +, 0 a - C `� L a v a C +D by p ro CL < +�, pp �� VI C m V) C ro C O o Q .w C E a a) +' as +' ,,�! L -c C O 0- U +, U N N to - CU N +, Oa) Las ro dp ? Q N a +� a p C - Q L E a C EC C — 3 p C ao +. O a a 0 p OH O E .L CD C a ° O VI O > rB co L as +, A' +J -c ro 00 a r , - 0 Q C () L to ' co O wM�F/ C a L C C t a N C a L Lro co U N .vw O +, w +, Y •r_Lo O U n ca +, bnc La ro O C C O 'O �,� - C L +' 'Cr) -O C p W c° o r, �_ c co w MI e ° `�° ° v v) N E a {�' ii co CO p > 2 0 73 N i > N0 ° 0 v-s sr) +' o _CDIll i �' L U — a O ro C a Li' a 4; m a 0- +�, C CO( � a t CLO t6 Y C (..> N a LCO - > a a > CL 1 • ` v a) " : v c +-, co a) C U > L ro U C 10 +, 0 a CL o O C 0 - C a ro D o a ra cD 0 [ +>, a o g n a o ra s N C O L L L r6 U - �-- '} U L •- a > VI o C N a L L U c a ap �PF _ C as o C a a a Co U o a a a -p c E LI- 0. U +,, L 0 - 0 N t1p C U r = L 5 w U c - o Q C o v E o C v o c 0 0 p 2 Pt i ro 3 -o N - C C -0 0 U +, p To L +-' a) o a .07 ro a t10 co - t +, a C — dA o co t <I.) o o f N v = r p N N C _0 `~ a C L L L - L L *-' L 7 E L • p CO a >' a C a$ C 3 O Q H a CON a O U U E O O O O O N O �_ J N C a L >` L a -0 O E {� VI (-• V) +, +, i +, a t ' ro Q -0 4-, V) V) v V) > MS �= r6 C a r 1� .,/•° N a C a -0 a L +O, as. E a a a CO a) a C a = 0) _ ° �• (6 > CO ! ..r U +' U CD U a U 0 7 7 7 U 7 7 3 C U — f6 0 •C = _ N C -0 C a C v �}a E Q tT 0 0- co CT tS L tS ° -, co ro E L C O C 0 L O L �} O Q a a) a s a a .2 a -F., W 2 a ? U co U co U a co C ro cc cc cc rn G •C 7 3 p ro ' o H U U +J to (i) i € • • • • • • • • • • 0 286 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT b 0) O c � - + ° Li t i.. O v m• 1 c m A 2 cx 0 H t Q a y a m c r. O 4-' 03 O o C a CCZI C t r us ro ) rte. cu c co C +-, 0 C amgo a; os +� Y L U a o 0 16 o - p C f6 O HECE o Q m D = a m al C __ dA f0 +-, aJ ed g . ° 0 Vf V) CU 22 o n y N _ d L m -. Q Q L tO en d `l N 7 co aJ Q O C `~ 0 = O F N w C vi N a `` Z in '+� H N +.+ (, C b Lc W C vi •._ ll�_ f6 L - ' Q +' `o c m IL u j O LE IL a > ° o °1 ) a) < = m d N c w "Cl c - o +� 4 C j m ti X o y n 12 8 .,T U N O C O U +-' Q 7N O 8 cNa nn vI p +, Nv +-) 1:3 o y y LLI • O ( = 0) C C U] ._ OO ON -0-as _ci O oc73 - ' o c c O av C N O s- CY) CN- _C v _0 N +.' -C N N t it +' fa C > , C p-p •— m L p co ccas (0 v ° 0 3 -0 -i co ai N C •= 0 4 .o (6 a1 No Q •• N > 3 = E to N Q 0 p -' i > N Q 0 i_ U O = t6 D CD z O C N 73 Q O O f6 _ TS• a) O N Q ? 41 C Q CO a1 > N N c 'a N O N O +_, a C O o - — 'O T-1 CU v 0 t p Q dA ai Q- CC N 3 c O 0 ' ) E 0E c (0 > a1 Ca TS O UO N .0 Q s c v i v v O E O ro N v > C ^S 7 v) v ,_ Q > aJ CU CCO T=� -0 C O y� '0 U '� V 0 Q Y LJ to 13 c3 U +' +�-' a) V1 a) Q c t i+ N 0 E t10 p N as cu W L v, v, ,40 in 03 a) a1 01 c to '> O_ C a) aJ a E 7 O O 7 : Q v +▪ - C = L N - '-01 ra •_ O� C C Ill v c v o 0 0 0 0 O 0 a> ›- ° t E CC -0 >O Q- -0 a) u u '^ 0 00 I- H m U a) > . . • • • • o O O Ov U 287 vi o a. . tE 70 1-1cd '47..' O cC Oczt s"cn `� O cd bA u t N 0� ,y 04 Aa, N bA04 F, 0 N O � NN H c0 ai O O D O a�o 04 0,0 o v) .06 v .. uO4. .• o ,n at o c 0 o Q a. n o0 -o8 Q p 4 cn cd , 0 '„ • O� CO = 3 •p E by p .. Q,• f70 0 ff 0 0, 5 .� � Od5 i O „'. o O O to o j •5 -o E -o �� n� U bA . 0 v) civv� •^, cl � r+eet N " N • 0 0ad •.N te C t , N 0 y NM C/� jO"� � • cr6a> vOy . 2 Y 'ay70 LA •. O C „p 4 o cd a " N . u : +' cC O C F0 . y O mv, C7 0 cd N 4? +� ", h N O N " s0, y H p z Mq1.1 0 M y v; z +�"+ O. ZZ' .tr,"• O v) -0 o. N cd N )-1 C^ y O a) Q o cz E e 3 at --. ate' o v , ea a 4 o , °' o i o 0 `t v 'B czt • o ti °' O ct r" 0 .� n V Q O y > p ;� cd y„ �. vi C� o4 0 N 6' 0 O - Q +' �., O O OV O y N cd w V N cd • r, t.,. `�` b,p bA •0 Y s. cd LE CD� a.) bA'73 r. m N N 0 �r � pt a) 0 0 cd 0 0 0 h y 1.) y O t LE i.y S.. v) ,—, •s.. w N ,y +' is '� •�+ Y cd •^, -4 0) 'N .� cd C x X 5 7-� �r C i-r ct '�' O v [�I y A m . ;. .Z 0 a) iy i w CU O N 4. O E". ,„ 0 N .., .= 0 v) y O N Q. 0 L. 'd O V> tuo• y v o 1 ii �" O czt0 o .ti a> cC C N 1.4 CD v) 0 .5 �tj -o 46 tip : wl) ti .) 0 ," F' y10 aU b � CD CI4 s O s: >; �� c. " vii p 4" 0"a) at O o 2 Oa 0 0 -O y r.., tv O �A a� a) y o. - -pi g -0 te • a-i 0) 0) ti a 2 d •,—, rte+ A� " �" 0 o •0 y O O UI. 0• X C Q.• C c O p O .V. bA N N 2 •ti z •� 0 Q.' 0 ¢ •ii o o W 0-1 A— W W •ti -0 0. 0. E� . Ti cn /7) a' ,.o ,.o c O " 2 o • • • • • • • • • m , c� Q Fl V1 E-, E-, 3 cd 4 E 1 U H Q 288 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT a) ,x 0 ° •0 0 •0 p ani a`di = ' ct 1 4-i t1 N i-i cn r s. -0 0 . O a. 9, cd v o N E y c� > 4. O 1 rn cd cd N s. N 0 N O " Q. O at F- 0 p +-' a) 0 O ,�--• ,r a) s N O ¢ O O ^0 � O 60i O cr v p 3 a fig" fig" y r y 5 ^� y p. O UYy 4- .0 } E • > O .y. -. ) ac.",24 cd O g �--, bq.� """ """ "d N y Sx-, ,0 ¢' y fi O vI y "6 o O }, rn O O N O {c{-crt cd 0 O O O O t1, -. S]. N y�j 0 •^� c N .��' yO.i cd N ,� C O v' +' .� V] �--, '.Nct, Ou'0 N y s.y rat � " o v] „� �' y ,- › > ,- 4 -0 Q. . vi O O ,g O 4-• O cOd O a) O y O O-, 0 0 a) as ^' '" O O a) O"• O O .2 y cd U 3 O O U 4 0 U 'rn -4 0y,-g d r s~ i-' O 0 U O y cn O p `, •�� a) s-, > .> cd 0 "" .0 O cd 0ct mt L Q. ¢ U ••,. cd 0 cd C I 0 ^0 .L," `n g > bA O O ct 0 N vUi cd U- bA >, 0 O cd > 0 U -o ,�••--. �, �, O ;� 4� s' ° ,4 E v V y b1' 0 O pa Q. ct > cd > " 0 v 0 p0• �}' p cr o to O >, , O °� a) .. ami o P. a) cd " zz, •y U to-g g '3 — 0 0 O p _ p.l ca.., -0 0 '0 cz 00 '› cd to ,--, rn U .ri 0 •> O - .S= 0 0 y ,� .-•, > O a) ti O p `� P. S ^ at U U > .0 g >, E O U 0 .• O bOA ti 0 cd p 0 4� L N �A = cn 'C s0. .� 0 nczt ..., VI 0 O O F. bA U cd 0 04 s" , O ++ '0 .0 t.,-, cd .� O Q. O O g 0" O N M U s.-, a) .0 '" cd U �--, ,--, .. O O O O �+ "" O N O N a, 00 N OU N -� 'C OU U U ct 0. '-. N U Off" O OS. v ~ter i11 O • Q. U z. • O [� a) c0C v +� O p bA"" g 4. �," •"0 O N•.`�-. 0. •s- S". y . y y 0 O O O O >, O p p �, O U ^0 O �, v 00 Q >, 0 > O~ 0 u, U cn ' at O O O O w g 'O O A, O O c 0 0 rn 0 0 0 O Q O U O y '9 - cn O O >' N O `n �' N sem.. V] 'F. Q. . '+ O �' �. 0 s0, •��' s••' O >, O O `n ,O. .S"5' .8 O O O O v, Q. O z '0 ,� i..' 0 0 N a) O �' 0 O O H cd •, O N P. A, �O U z ,� o cd 1 70 •, 4. cd a) to rn U 4-, zi mt �Ny o.' �.• ^C 4, p. ^C > y C O pct y --+' 'n ot '-' v' • .�.." N a) O O s. ^� cd z 0 Q V Ccd O .2 > , O o• U 4� �"" .�." r""cctc �y03., 0 0 • 'C ,S," ^ ^ >> 4p. cn O H �L' N �'" "u" 3'" >>'cd 'C S�.�'. 7 3 N u 0 >, '' ' W '� '� a) vi +� O~^v] y -., V] .--, O ,� -iO. O V " ,-0 .�'r, y.., ,� N L., •'V 0 4-I >, o > O O bA aa) +; ai y 0 > L, 0 O O -0 ,- 0 v c O O 0 �bA N ObA ,- u O 0 O �,•., > OO m +�- O O x. to U �+ 0 vcdi ccO O O N cd - O a~j a�j N O y y 4. •C .N 'd y cztp— rn bb 8 N O ; O Q O 0 '+ N y0 Sp '� �,Q ct p O .0 O �S" O 0 -- G '0 v, E ` ¢ to„g 0. O Q 0. b 9 cd U N O ++ O b(1 U E 0 O O P� 0 DC v •�'.0 r'" n 0 "" 0 p. O A� c0 LE b:E uA U y U • 3 s. O 0 s'- cd i-.; cd v O O O 0 .0 p '� s, 0 •0 N 3 N ^0 LE X t+ O + _ y j vni V 4� N to.- <1.) h '414 C 0 '-' •n 'O- O +' ,� O N O bq 0 c j Lu c� v) 0 O �, a) O cd v) '� O cd 0 : u `.' a) a—' O O 0 4-, s0. '0 ,s.' 5 0 0 O 0 9 O "'0 'C 7 cd 0 cn bA ,, 's=, , U _, cA •w'., U O . 'OF yam.., ., a) .0 "0 O U O to v up a) O „� > O •> , cd ... 4. CJ U O s-, �, O 0 CO) 5 O -- v> >.., H a) O O , O '� a) ' . bA,g .40 �; O y 99 H >,•O •. C c6 ••- id ¢ i �1_ ' cd �O sU, 0 N y cd - • r �� vi _ 0 y cd F" yca O cd +�. s v O h �' v) _ Q s-, o .+r, c `'"' •^. O Ct O 4� N 0 �' N ¢ Q 0 s" O �+ •' Q Oa >, H 0 cd O '0 a, '41 41 v, "0 n �� N >, y. U '� O OcA O O 0 h O •.. •Fn 0 �" a v) 0 U ,L) ..0. i O S--, rr '.yam-, — a) 0 cd ., •., >, f"' N p'd .. G O ,4 �" cd cd O g S." Q. U • cd 0 ,., cd > , `S O ,� cd U 0 P-, „^� !C : y ,.1.-1 v) cd N i, 7-, -F, 0 O O •. cd 0 0, 0 U0 0 cd > y y0 s.., s-, ,_, F-, Q., O cd v) y0 z >.O 0 . = 0 > s: .s,�. ,.. O 40 N '0^''C O 0 ti cd " J ^0 F 00 'V O G4 '0 cd N O R' 0 5 ... U • 0 n cd `" 1 O Cg M0 O O •, �i U > bA > cd O O >~" r > y SOI %) .a) O n n .0 �,•—, O ^� ) -0 aj �� Cly O F�� 0 0 C �O >, O �" n °.-). v� a z toC > cd �" rp y ^gyp H ,, , ' 0 y � n N pis 4. to a) U •r0 0) Ctr" �" �' .y CTy cid er. p y O A ' cid V .4 -0 ,, �' fig.' 0 v fig", E.' '.. y� N 48 o cA 4 0 N y Y N 6 '5 +•' t ' y^ +- tt �.' 0 O � �. ? '� +-+ rOn O O 0 p. F-," v' N "-.• I� +�., " �.' U y i.-, ,� •., ..... ,�" a" � V cOd y OU O u U •.�.�" ••.. cd 'y �.' ' O F-," O >' O �" ., p U c" O N 0S., ti O C >, cd �. p. A O E 4 c, 8 . 0 . '� O 0 - O 0 0 ti cd 0 U cd Q cd v] QQ •., .'14 45 N et En oE 'Ccd 0cn en N' O rn = • U ct O v � N n y • O L)) �o -c •E O c'+ -- i -s - ,. 0 O 'C �, y8 N c 4- 75 o inisyE...., ° i v mo ) ai o IJH ai c ¢"PIO 0 MI t. + ZgvE. 1 up , U cd o )• dg o_° Ct UU .. •-•:--' '� o.1 y o ) O M. ° OU po O4i "a 'U� N O r. y 0U nO +-' • czt m .y 6.40 N}' Q, '" `d 0v `d Z � , i oi i y • � o4. gmo - ° a`' .o . ' E > i 0 o o o v ° )o cd o. > a) ° ". oNo '� 't ' . g� g, to — 0 -o (I) .d aam ct t:s° U cd O p cd N . eto a) 0 4. o o o m '~ y z o. cd y -d tig ? aU a) oo OO g , >,2 ., . U pUct .. U „' y y bs 'C .+ , p bI N •y y. z ,i A— U •-A Q � O 3•. r.., ~ U i-I \� a) U .� •'" �1 a) U y O 6 zt .y O L, O v3 V N 4. A-•, 0 4.) cd s 0 •O .g s..g ti) y O O Q 'O "O Z ''Z3 � ,-O Q }}). ..... cn Z �" ¢ 'ez yy.. Q < �+ N cd U, N om'. y �", V •N 4. 4. U N En N �" O �,,, O 0 �+• Cu) c}., '� .�'' (ztcd +J E �O 4. U UO ',1 ,� S� O O U y p O ti O U o U ". s. y ti q . y u O i. LE LE U U o. U �. — cd 4 p U p cd a) O U cd 'C v, ? o x x +,4 s-, .. o s. v 4 I ° Z s� R o p. a) ,� .- Cr U a) '� o O ` . w Lu •'. cd v •;' o ° o •0 '0 N v '^. N U a) cd U VI 0 0 o `d Z Q v ° o a, a, s. . ° a) U o rr ? p C ti -4 0 •,-) cn 4,N to U ^p O U U ° U Cr O 0 . . 44O 0 �U U a F � 0 ry O ° ° h "- E+.U vE •a.~ to'- a) .G •es, • ya• ...z = . • N . ` • a" +.• U O �" �CI) AC o o U s•. t o '' " -4 • cd 4. -O O 4.U O - zt O � •f '`1 0 U N pg 'O 'd ,.. y ' _ s •y ct p0g X � C 'U cd 4) p �Fc � •ti� .4, o Z • • 0 U "O 44 • S-4 G ,.' �d ^ +. c1.) 4-, _ OV � .I-. y U p ° ° O Y 4. Cd . tiV CaN ° VU aO U p N a" .-+ .,-,o 4- .,- U L. c#, t U .� pr _, ° i�, a? N / 0cd p Q ct C4J P.A . •. F •+ 0 O O � °". 0 U. .O+ V r th ' Ua •—' •� p �1 ° q cO4 sp y g+ aU .4 , c* to E g ''" d , ''7tO v, Q g 0 v,0g O O F. OUiQ it P O 0cd • .jg '_ - O A' N 4-4 a , E Q. '' 72 3 _0 y N 4 F 4 M cd Fcd 0 . d / � O O U O. > „g ...j O U Ov, OUy N) > Ny S • ? v) UN 0 0 4-4 4 V 8 A ° •v O p y U OO � vi .--' ti O 0 py0n N .3. y vi : y'C rU cd w v� _ C. y Oct + \ i-0O L. p. N c cd p p O C el H a 290 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT • c't �ss�-.� 0O O .4— yNd Us, QN0 . , b 'd • bA ^p •' N O d N N vi: F 4" a _Th— 'dyg •o m • + O +' P P OP UO �A-. y U N s '- o O OyO - c ;-. Q)y aj N ��" U N •.. N , y Na) y y n cu H u) • SZA O U H te 'CI P , 0 ' ••—: N to 0 bA U _ U tO a) •'" y N 'G � cd oy.,g „gp bQvi S. Cd wn — .� � U N 0 " �N' N bA p � U •r = a) 4 .4 a) 4 9 0p , 0 az c., p3" O czt O am " a) - N P o N t .y • O -p ¢' yU cd P, 0 , ' ' p "G a) at y, to cl g 4 N 4' NP N .as> 8 to cd ;-, O vyy + O > " p up 0 ) U "" 0 N . • "" p '0 . p ,4 N O _ a¢ T •5 PN s. cd •� _ iU .• — p ' ) N P, E - Pvi •• tUi v, cd v, p vi 'C 4, Cd .-i N U y YUr - O "O . m .^ Oy - - , , O O ) U v) y t 4" .teN O U n - N cp .2 v 70 z ,UN 'C ,�O �",N OrN,N U 'nN U U • '^ a) P, cd U m a+^p N U cd -I-'� N P. 0 , dyc, at • • •CD p Li) N 1),," " •O i o • yO 0, 'C NO S. N d •o . _ •-g c O a) bA a) Z• + 1, O ,g ' a) cd S >. A-• aPcP, s ^!+' C. 'C U P N cd zp p F0 y d cdO a) vi "G � .7g y,, ) ) 0 g N R � P, a) p 70 i 6 s, O .pa) O O Q 6. g O au bA 7 ,OaCd I)� . > . > czt • m • " ci) "~ , U 5 •-•.,_, 7.), 0 �U - , 1., ' T..: p 'P a) . n +. . O v) , O ) o NM ^COa) . pN ,—I P~ c 00 v, r.- r bO O p "O i4 fa.,5 >� .N .� O0 N Oy 0 N OOUU . A czt '- , y 0 ,— LA 'G U 'doLn dH cd U r, . '4 O :15 O C. P, 't EP O " cd -48 aS, cdv . 0 1.,) )C 0 U Ua) OO O O U ' ' :� O N vi czt O N AF4 U ., aj •p U O UV) N -i- ti O So, UN y Cll g " - OCyd•2 p vcd 4. ,- U .. •• , y ,AO • —,, CU OU g g '' •'. 0 ,, Cd O Y ui "ti •• O >. � •,-- N Nd ...7_1rN4' . yapz cd P, 4 a) aO 4-, ) -. aY ) — O O $8,6, 0 ;' O ' ) 3 . u ✓ ) �cU U P )Z •.-, Z?, U m E gP" -1 cd av' O , Ua) cd N Uc O 0 P d O > , OmO cU Q O "� s .5O ° 4" >. ) S � 0 O > 4 `-' 0 .sr0 O z . 0U , 2 DU tcto d vv +_' a) . ) P, U -4-' V a) " PPPi O •0 p C7 � ttO O 3Q O U + cv, 0 oO U O c _ AF's' U N U ObA ,-0 z j - Ho I. toa.) y - 0 0 bA ON = '' t -O , O a ¢ O la '. UO 0 PO C E 'G ,r, P ,-), O ' O ` `d O , O bd O a) 0 pp , a) • acC v SagF d Q ,i U y y a)O U cy N P '-o am '^" mo'� p • 0 ~ 0P ' ,-, , OE O nU Cd C� " •ma �4 g t 0 aO H p p 0 cd . ¢ Cd + p • • - t/1 P ) Uy - U . •� +-..' y _O )+, ;., O maU N •-t: ccct 0 vi m s. OW --, czt P . � p a) < � -Q A, 0 z' '' • m -, N L o .4 P, 3- cn •› mO O a) H cd ^ ¢, ,,, p +' ., � N P t. CN U OU • ,O p 4,O n cn N - . J •;-.•• kO Cd E ,s , Q0 Y, P, + i-pns up 0 - O , • s, U OUiP 'd cd xww O cd m cd .O PO � QO cd ,1) E y, d H !Di) P, O E :-, cd a) + O cd n Q n U C7p a) 'C U v) v -4.,' ,, -,, O 0 4, CU U •O �, !Di) pcd -c) ) UPs a) U � N ct �' - ) o •oU .� U$-' , " " O ,, n cn bA P,44" bA O U y •., - U `4idP" O y N O -1--, C, N ,—, ,- ci O n ' O Zd cn ^ Cd 0 zL., P czt P ,S0c v, a) xcn 4, . N NU . N FPUU 'ODCNto p N ▪ 3 1— Q OQZcd0 .� . 4to n • ') 2 0 �: vi'O E cn t 0 P-' O U 'C P O •0 H •." O a) .tom 0 U U a) , - ,.O cn P, i^ .'p N •o rn •2 0 P, v F, :, pp t," cd bQ U ;;- al r,'-, ^ +' .� •E U i-' Z _ ,ZZ, a) ^� O P, O 6:2-,c.., .9-,', P, a O O O ma, 'Z O SC73 -'0 ^� U Z' +3_', N N •sem- O O a) a) O cbdQ G .� ,4 �' 4 •V) , O P, Zt Ca, p 0 0 4) w a) —, .O " bA^a �, v P" cid U 4 vi Cin N N cUn L.,, 0 u) s., O •O �' A-+ '� ,s: ' U 'n "C" •8 N 0 cC c3 ,1 c,' .� "" O Cd p ,� 'G ,Sr' ice. p ,s: r▪ > a) a) 0 b4 P, • �, a0 a) U p ,+ O U O O 4 cd y •- U y HH ) U •f. y +' N N O .., a) v: bQ n U ��. 6 U x" '-' v] y c4i r:' • , 0 •0 Q I. bA• cd ++ U 0 O H N ��" �" ��, U �bA O Uj C.) s-*P, a U 0 �' O 'V a+�j cid ct OPi rj, N c' 'd O 'er 0 O N O O n :o O :� O N O O cPC �' 0 U Z4 7- y P . P, bA N Q p N bA U • 4, 4+ U U 'p •� spy 7g U v ", cin �, Q, Q, Q" cd � g-' 0 a!4 cd 'C O E, CJ ,•O ,g c. 2 sU, H Ci O g pU '0 •5 P. 'C N cP'd p,'P, OU g UC. sU, sU, H .5 0 :5 Ci sU-, '-i r,'", 'G to sU- of sU-, O 0 Pi W N M 291 Appendix J Station Existing Conditions Briefing Factor Data Source Notes To better understand what new mobility elements are best suited at each station, Total Population ACS 5-Year a detailed demographic analysis was performed using the 1/2 mile walkshed.This (2013-2017) walkshed is based on the existing transportation network, not straight-line distance Total Jobs LEND(2017) Sum of all full and part time jobs around each station. around each station;and is therefore subject to change with future changes to the #of Employment Sites LEHD(2017) Total number of employment locations(i.e.restaurant, transportation network and bicycle/pedestrian improvements. hospital),each of which may have multiple employees. Total Households ACS 5-Year (2013-2017) The table on the left highlights factors used to inform suitability and potential market %of Population between ages ACS 5-Year demand for new mobility services.Specific services will be prioritized at each station 5-17 (2013-2017) to meet the unique mobility needs of populations nearby.To provide a comparative %of Population over age of 65 ACS 5-Year assessment across all stations,specific data points are highlighted on the following (2013-2017) •%of Jobs with Earnings LEND(2017) LEND reports data for this threshold,which is pages that are average or higher than average compared to other stations. <$1,250/month representative of a full time job at the federal minimum wage. The primary sources of this data came from: %with Disability ACS 5-Year • American Community Survey(ACS)five-year data(2013-2017)was used to evaluate the (2013-2017) population and household demographics.Most of the data is available for each Census Block %Minority ACS 5-Year Group,though a few categories such as disability status are only available for the larger (2013-2017) Census Tracts. %Poverty to Income Ratio<1 ACS 5-Year A ratio less than 1 means that the income is less than the • Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics(LEHD)(2017)provided employment data for (2013-2017) poverty level.The Census Bureau uses a set of money each Census Block Group. income thresholds that vary by family size and composition • Land Use,Terrain,Key Destinations,and Transportation network data was provided by TriMet to determine who is in poverty. %Speaking English less than ACS 5-Year and other teaming partners. 'very well' (2013-2017) %Zero Vehicle Households ACS 5-Year (2013-2017) PM Peak Traffic Volumes TriMet and other Volume is rounded Total PM peak hour traffic entering the teaming partners intersection. Conflict Potential between TriMet and other Rough estimate of the number of travel modes directly modes teaming partners adjacent to the station area,traffic volume,and level of non- motorized infrastructure. •i Perfect Grid(1/2 mile) TriMet and other Measure of how directly someone can travel on the existing teaming partners street system compared to if there was a perfectly gridded street network.A high level measure of the connectivity of the street network. %of acres with Slopes>4%(1/2 TriMet and other mile) teaming partners 292 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Station Existing Conditions: Gibbs Street Station ti ■ The suitability of new mobility services is assessed based on existing land-use,demographic,and physical constraints. - — Combined,these factors can help indicate the likelihood L--Alt • } -.",� , . " s: ` - of success in providing a type of first and/or last mile . : �� - '74 ' _' } A'rk "r __{: ,- � " — connection. ']�. :- ..1.,- _ - y • } R :a f ,, T • p '. DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) f• - _ ..� _ a . _ •+1�. - !w ,"`-'� " •' °\�D — �j r Total Total #of Employment Total -,:-;,.:#4 • w Eew"` - '' `'4- .' _ Population Jobs Sites Households e `" 20,553 39 ir 840 d „` *,Lr ; •_' r• '-3 git _:, - ., �`r`~, '; _ POPULATION FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) -_ rt .,-__:,...-...:,,--, . ,,,,,,,,,,,=, --4,_ t f , " .--:-, - ,- -. %of Population between ages 5-17 7% '.....111"...„.1.,.., 4,.....• s Ali.. �: � •. %of Population over age of 65 _ � '#. ems.` - f; "' -` • =� %of Jobs with Earnings<51,250/ 8% s:_.=.- ,.• �, - month - _ >"- , - ..? �►, (` [: %with Disability 10% 0 ��` • _-._-' '-OPE e Minority - . e '' I•• .. •$ %Poverty to Income Ratio<1 10% �r Y Y . 4•:.-r - - :I''k -, ,.,,77-,„, %Speaking English less than'very 6°%o �. Via. t. Pa 1�, . .� k 4 well' '^ rNI, 'r %Zero Vehicle Households 18% le is�'� � '' r ,'r �ePQ ►_ - 1�� © ' 5 .a .-1� MOBILITY ASSESSMENT FACTORS r ter, ��'y- N. 4 PM Peak Traffic Volumes 1,700 vehicles per hour - 10' E ; ?-2P'44' ,� �iS1� ,Z� • 1` .f Conflict Potential between modes Medium �' %Perfect Grid(1/2 mile) --wgrpoimmimme•-• - %of acres with Slopes>4%(1/2 mile) 9% +k' ,. ;; I Average or higher than average compared to other stations •f^ `� ;, f ESTIMATED MOBILITY SOLUTION MARKET DEMAND '', r �_ ,r,r: Micromobility •-- '.40 a +++�'``! ' + ry Bike Share(Docked) No Current Demand - - g. O Bike Share(Dockless) No Current Demand �dz-,5..- © O_ Electric Bike/Scooter Share Microtransit High Demand 1 3 The current configuration of Barbur Blvd The neighborhood immediately east of the Terwilliger Blvd is located above the station on On Demand Shuttles(AV Potential) No Current Demand carries low traffic volumes,with striped station is part of the Lair Hill Historic District, Marquam Hill,and accessed by a pedestrian Circulator Shuttles(AV Potential) No Current Demand buffered bike lanes and midblock pedestrian with local streets connecting Barbur Blvd and connection near the future station. Car Share crossings. Naito Pkwy. Car Share No Current Demand On Demand Ridehailing High Demand A A This mode/amenity would help to MARKET Low Demand 9 Station Location create connections to the station, DEMAND Medium Demand CONTEXThowever it could be accommodated in , High Demand MAP V' Street View Location a partner agency's right-of-way Source:Mobility Solutions Suitability Assessment,Fehr&Peers 293 Station Existing Conditions: Hamilton Street Station The suitability of new mobility services is assessed based _ on on existing land use,demographic,and physical constraints. - = - - - — - Combined,these factors can help indicate the likelihood _ '� of success in providing a type of first and/or last mile =fig - ' ' :rc:- - rir•a•''-ph- -,i.:z•: .:.T -. •--- - '��r•--,- !r��.- - � _ � •. _ - -'•-rte,•. �'-� � = .. - _,_ - - connection. 44 _ I. ' :a[� '}�.�, •-- . 6 DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) _ _ - AN41.1411110Total Total #of Employment Total "' Population Jobs Sites Households T-7.'5'- ..," . :'.-.ray: =5 *...' i' �`� :, . ,,. _- - T ;,'.,Ykr •''' • ., SW :... ,.y�r- _ 1,210 715 27 663 .. - r ! .s ._ •,.y- CORRETTAVE •_ r - . _ �;� irl. POPULATION FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) ~ Y- ~� '� ,_ '? 96 of Population between ages 5-17 6°i° ,, �: •or %of Population over age of 65 IMP tot.�,�}�_- `trylitktom yy y- Jr LL %of Jobs with Earnings<$1,250/ 19°i = �'y �'v �� SecoNDOR `F .�� rr•' c� �•- month aNcpO� '`� ALS - "' %with Disability v. SWY �s- Y y • _'' � <_ . _.>;4 r.� 7. . ,... r - My K, '.# 96 Minority 22°i° ;:{` „ . ( +�J � Poverty to Income Ratio<1 10 i° � .. T'r_�- © ''" ';11','` I. :•-1,t •4 ,�~� t" %Speaking English less than'very 3°i° . ° -. ' �: i ;; _: well' z V '' Zero Vehicle Households i° IN .... , , . 4,.,,,: . 'h _ #' '!:. '.i SW VIEW POINT - .'�v o t.i, s T S, 4. _ ,' ;- TERRACE - `c 4 5'- - s�, • • 0. t- '• m }y ;'" L -or;. ' ,,, �° 0+ MOBILITY ASSESSMENT FACTORS 4 PM Peak Traffic Volumes 4,600 vehicles per hour ;''t', .r Conflict Potential between modes High %Perfect Grid(1/2 mile) 54% . ♦ %of acres with Slopes>4%(1/2 mile) 18% • Average or higher than average compared to other stations /•'. i' +.. ESTIMATED MOBILITY SOLUTION MARKET DEMAND ii - - ''' pi , , �� Micromobility ;_�� Bike Share(Docked) No Current Demand s Bike Share(Dockless) No Current Demand O - O :- O Electric Bike/Scooter Share Medium Demand Microtransit The current configuration of Barbur Blvd SW Corbett Ave acts as a"main street" The neighborhood west of the station is On Demand Shuttles(AV Potential) No Current Demand carries high traffic volumes,with striped bike parallel to Barbur Blvd with small-scale retail primarily single-family residential,with on- Circulator Shuttles(AV Potential) No Current Demand lanes and sidewalks. and office,and bus and cycling facilities street connections to the Terwilliger Pkwy Car Share connecting the station area to John's Landing greenbelt. Car Share No Current Demand to the south. On Demand Ridehailing High Demand i This mode/amenity would help to MARKET Low Demand 9 Station Location create connections to the station, DEMAND Medium Demand CONTEXT however it could be accommodated in , High Demand MAP V Street View Location a partner agency's right-of-way Source:Mobility Solutions Suitability Assessment,Fehr&Peers 294 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Station Existing Conditions: 13th Avenue Station The suitability of new mobility services is assessed based on existing land-use,demographic,and physical r constraints. ,r - Combined,these factors can help indicate the likelihood + c_r _ -'��` c of success in providing a type of first and/or last mile - • -'Fr- = connection. •' '`-- f'"t j -.,-.1" .' =sem =. DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) %:-/VP f:rlitt ••••, / - , f -_ r,� -.; Total Total #of Employment Total t, ' �� "^'�' + Population Jobs Sites Households r `` a' 9 _ '1 -. . --..--.:L s' ..,: r 804 19 651 7 , � =,-mss � .�� .._ `_ . _- - ..ry r-�' .• - .'2.4��-., `; -said. �. •,�= a Q a �':•' - POPULATION FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) 4' lyo.•. x: `J� -,---4;-A.© - ,..SW 13T-HAVE -..-`:•...•- 1i of Population between ages 5-17 12°%° �� ,, x Ep a P g -s -A ..� ?°tea ,t'- : q,"-0-- .is '�""' ,-4.4,- - ,V67. %of Population over age of 65 13°i° `" 1� , fripii-4,111,11VA ' "' " ' �"' %of Jobs with Earnings<$1,250/ 27% 11 -. .- •. (�` month `' .y te a _ _ _„t %with Disability 10°i° F 1:4;,.; a -.t _ r�r _ - _ _ , Minority 12% �r ^?a _a e E 1.- �'` _ _ _. 9 %Poverty to Income Ratio<1 12°i° - ?1 +,d di 4 •a )•{� - r" w7.•�. ►: ilk ---..,. ,. WeSpeaking English less than'very 2% �¢•. ... o �, _ - 96 Zero Vehicle Households 6°i° ;r'. MOBILITY ASSESSMENT FACTORS I 1 1 PM Peak Traffic Volumes 2,800 vehicles per hour �`,} y St14 _ -_ Conflict Potential between modes High %Perfect Grid(1/2 mile) 59% - 7 , ., %of acres with Slopes>4%(1/2 mile) f : Fr � - WON I Average or higher than average compared to other stations cry:: " r', - ESTIMATED MOBILITY SOLUTION MARKET DEMAND �Y .;;' - _ J.. ,,t_• - ;, Micromobility •••Y-.,_• - - Bike Share(Docked) No Current Demand Bike Share Dockless No Current Demand - 2 � Electric Bike/Scooter Share Medium Demand 1 Microtransit The current configuration of Barbur Blvd Bertha Blvd is a crucial connection that moves The station area consists largely of surface On Demand Shuttles(AV Potential) Low Demand carries medium traffic volumes,with striped people between 13th Station and Hillsdale parking lots for nearby retail and office Circulator Shuttles(AV Potential) No Current Demand bike lanes and infrequent pedestrian crossings Town Center. destinations that are adjacent to the station. Car Share _ near the future station. Car Share Medium Demand 1 On Demand Ridehailing Medium Demand A A This mode/amenity would help to MARKET Low Demand Q Station Location create connections to the station, DEMAND Medium Demand CONTEXT however it could be accommodated in , High Demand MAP V' Street View Location a partner agency's right-of-way Source:Mobility Solutions Suitability Assessment,Fehr&Peers 295 Station Existing Conditions: 19th Avenue Station The suitability of new mobility services is assessed based on existing land-use,demographic,and physical constraints. Combined,these factors can help indicate the likelihood of success in providing a type of first and/or last mile connection. '-'1 ":;4::‘� i" '.- �' ��' _ i �. '�.- -n .' y ' 4"": `` i - DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) y L •a p .: r '`ice "' ' e. ` v' : .r �_ Total Total #of Employment Total ;' c• '. �k fie'.' k V.4 ''i�-' ' } - "'� ` 7^ - ..rotc " ' Population Jobs Sites Households " ,� '• }.. f .t • ,; � -.- -.r ^ter , t 1,313 925 "t'� "r t, •R} iin is .'-'g. • a& -- - POPULATION FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) ' '.r;- -: .., rx.. ---i'-ii,.:- ', Fjy F - , •y. _ ~,,� °°of Population between ages 5-17 q - M.." . _ - '� _ %of Population over age of 65 11% . • -r -- tel'.: „ �. .10,. - r %of Jobs with Earnings<$1,250/ 22% • S ' SW C;,0a.�U R- r -„.. -- y = .•,�"`.. ,- ,- zit. ''+p,•.i� g,P, • �'► month • = 3 rte' & . `.• a yrs %withDisability 10% � F ■ ':;;: �.'- K �s, ©• �. \ 1. ,� ° e .1;,_„. "._ %Minority 13i° yoE r_ _ 1r�■ •-- - k• - >-e: e ea •-'s' • Aeie Y -. 4.-,-..wW r9rygvF %Poverty to Income Ratio 41 13% - _ , = ;, %Speaking English less than'very 2°%° �7=' „e`v 3 c well' x's 4 00\-\"-:' -'' .': '1.-'':, O` s i r ` 1 ;.•,.\ 1, " ', %Zero Vehicle Households 6% le. 14 oet ._) . --v • „`_,, .:. ,,,, r '+. , "y. 0,MOBILITY ASSESSMENT FACTORS F ' y" PM Peak Traffic Volumes 3,600 vehicles per hour 4461.- £ # i- fi F • ` '-, = Conflict Potential between modesII High %Perfect Grid(1/2 mile) 77% • a %of acres with Slopes>4%(1/2 mile) % t ". I Average or higher than average compared to other stations . ' . - - " -- - ESTIMATED MOBILITY SOLUTION MARKET DEMAND r n -rR ." - . ..; „ - ' s Micromobility `�- � _ _�-� '- ..-- Bike Share(Docked) No Current Demand �` f Bike Share(Dockless) No Current Demand Electric Bike/Scooter Share Medium Demand 1 0 Q 0 0 Microtransit The current configuration of Barbur Blvd The 1-5 crossings at SW 19th Ave and SW SW Multnomah Blvd is a crucial connection On Demand Shuttles(AV Potential) High Deman carries high traffic volumes,with sidewalk and Spring Garden St currently lack adequate for all modes between 19th Station and Circulator Shuttles(AV Potential) No Current Demand bikeway gaps along Barbur Blvd as well as bicycle and pedestrian facilities connecting to Multnomah Village. Car Share intersecting streets. neighborhoods south of the station. Car Share Low Demand 1 On Demand Ridehailing Medium Demand A A This mode/amenity would help to MARKET Low Demand Q Station Location create connections to the station, DEMAND Medium Demand CONTEXT however it could be accommodated in I High Demand MAP 9I Street View Location a partner agency's right-of-way Source:Mobility Solutions Suitability Assessment,Fehr&Peers 296 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Station Existing Conditions: 30th Avenue Station The suitability of new mobility services is assessed based on existing land-use,demographic,and physical constraints. Combined,these factors can help indicate the likelihood „� �,,� • of success in providing a type of first and/or last mile �t - '•.. .. 4a . ' • -- w i� At connection. • .� s }.. '- yr�', - 2� r 0t 'y •,� •r � 5. ....h;;_..-- , �� 1} aan��yy : DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) f'�"_,j e.; 441?` !+rye z •,ry- - - Ali. _ ° rr----. �— tea►: _• ' Total Total #of Employment Total ,rsr A Population Jobs Sites Households ,t'' ` \.- �'''� _' � 1,701 17 814 Or R., 4.01 `}'r> ,_ POPULATION FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) �t- '.'t - - Y e :1 n.\t • �'' , .. ,, ' e �':i4;4:_'-- x %of Population between ages 5-17 13°%° ',,� , r „„“ X` 0.--r, O _�x' : ,- • • %of Population over age of 65 9°i° • s`* - .-.. - �/ 0 .c ,, y�'4 - - i %of Jobs with Earnings<$1,250/ 25% L ■ .'-� IL r. �" ~l -- - `. month fes. ` .,,slittim r ..-, k(_,,k,_,,,--;..- .. i m * if. 3.7 ` �� %with Disability 8°i° aie-:..•• ''n• ' - - ‘41-1 1 - .--.10. %Minority 17% - � .�; yam ' - %Poverty to Income Ratio<1 13°i° s r= � - y t; yi ,© ,...: Speaking English less than'very 2°i° ,.,•:, >. 9 + '•4Tr well' -- .: Zero Vehicle Households 9°i° Y' 9 I X. s • r }P` � r'' `. ei MOBILITY ASSESSMENT FACTORS - s4-4-4,--..' ¢* - _ "'i• - • I.°" ' ' °MAPF PM Peak Traffic Volumes 2,400 vehicles per hour / ""c+ yf , L S- ., _ Conflict Potential between modes Medium • %Perfect Grid(1/2 mile) 59% u. i %of acres with Slopes>4%(1/2 mile) I ;._. • �. , Average or higher than average compared to other stations �: ..1. • - ESTIMATED MOBILITY SOLUTION MARKET DEMAND ` ,4 r„ s Micromobility ` ' Bike Share(Docked) No Current Demand Bike Share(Dockless) No Current Demand IO 41' 0 O Electric Bike/Scooter Share Microtransit Medium Demand A L� The current configuration of Barbur Blvd The station area consists largely of surface There a number of local streets,such as On-Demand Shuttles(AV Potential) High Dema carries medium traffic volumes,with striped parking lots for nearby retail and office SW Primrose St,that are currently being Circulator Shuttles(AV Potential) No Current Demand bicycle lanes and an existing pedestrian destinations that are adjacent to the station. accessed off Barbur Blvd to connect to nearby Car Share crossing where the future station is located. residential neighborhoods. Car Share Low Demand A On Demand Ridehailing Medium Demand A i This mode/amenity would help to MARKET Low Demand Q Station Location create connections to the station, DEMAND Medium Demand CONTEXT however it could be accommodated in I High Demand MAP '9j Street View Location a partner agency's right-of-way Source:Mobility Solutions Suitability Assessment,Fehr&Peers 297 Station Existing Conditions: Barbur Transit Center The suitability of new mobility services is assessed based on existing land-use,demographic,and physical constraints. • - Yom' ,,+� •-•1. .i,s. - - - -`i - Combined,these factors can help indicate the likelihood ,: '' - r •> ,"-.` ,,e, .-'.' of success in providinga type of first and/or last mile ` r ., ,* `-J — _ _ connection. ` - , •.1. .$. l Arty - .C4Pry0 e -... •�• - ��.' , „ .f ms ' ' "� '^Y�"s HWr DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) , ,_ _ � � "+= 3 '`" "� 41 © t - = Total Total #of Employment Total rte',-_ ,© • Population Jobs Sites Households .-41-P - a • s 245 20 797 ,41110 glit.t. `s ;. ,y� ate` _cr..:,-.:__;; - �_ �. 7=3• ti `�ak "- : fi -.J 1kky1 WALKSHEDOF STATION) 4. rj 1512fr Ar 8% fes • - BTC PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY'' "• `t - It .�.'-ix O w,� %Minority 23% AY 1i-; - r _ ..4!.41 _ �� .i %Poverty to Income Ratio<1 14°i° •' P. '+�. - %Speaking English less than'very 5% Y ik L +. well' Li ...1 I • ' ` a'y :sem' �� `sP z � r' %Zero Vehicle Households 9°i ::- 4. a! ° .� • "' ir tr .-� L + MOBILITY ASSESSMENT FACTORS 74/ • J J , : - �', ' PM Peak Traffic Volumes 2,500 vehicles per hour i *L- -a a `" �` Conflict Potential between modes Medium %Perfect Grid(1/2 mile) ° %of acres with Slopes>4%(1/2 mile) 1% Average or higher than average compared to other stations a >_ yyi u „- ESTIMATED MOBILITY SOLUTION MARKET DEMAND � . . 7, , R...e -,�•,. �' ' �-.i_ ti:_. `-'�r��. l�� '.l ^ �.,,� , • ,g1r11. Micromobility -. _■ -'� " �`• =il.. ` ` - --." Bike Share(Docked) No Current Demand _ � p _ Bike Share(Dockless) No Current Demand OO Electric Bike/Scooter Share High Demand 1 0 - Microtransit The current configuration of Barbur Blvd The station lies just outside the mixed-use The convergence of many major arterials and On Demand Shuttles(AV Potential) No Current Demand carries medium traffic volumes,with striped core of the West Portland Town Center,which freeway on/off-ramps makes the station area Circulator Shuttles(AV Potential) No Current Demand bike lanes.SW Taylors Ferry Rd is a local includes grocery stores and offices. a challenging environment for all modes of Car Share a access road that runs parallel to Barbur Blvd. travel. Car Share High Demand — station location On Demand Ridehailing High Demand A This mode/amenity would help to MARKET Low Demand Q Station Location create connections to the station, DEMAND Medium Demand CONTEXT however it could be accommodated in I High Demand MAP 9' Street View Location a partner agency's right-of-way Source:Mobility Solutions Suitability Assessment,Fehr&Peers 298 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Station Existing Conditions: 53rd Avenue Station :' e,' _ : , ; The suitability of new mobility services is assessed based — _ _ - ; _ __� t.•;. -� ... '.._.1 - i on existing land use,demographic,and physical constraints. , ' - � ' . '-•' :� Combined,these factors can help indicate the likelihood -' -., ±,,i.-. }' _ ?' / of success in providing a type of first and/or last mile - r' . . ' .. ,. �r!.ii_:1,.• cj. ,- —; connection. -Z- *-----'� •- }:.��-~ :� Y..4 :1344 - *' 1: : 0 DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) �ti' _ t„• •F.• �,.�::. �'©;: : '. iy 110,,,,: • Total Total #of Employment Total allk..-_, e- Wt' Population Jobs Sites Households 1.'i , -N- Vu, * `� h ? , s ire - 777 175 11 336 iik SW POMONA sr _ -} ' .- -1y` \ .-- .+M ' '.:. k Ac . - — i,a Im s , ."--....$.i. :-` .I, - POPULATION FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) .:7'.,..,..-• cir aT` 'tr - # ^e< -:,-:117.40A__ - IIoi' %%•�� inority 22% s 1 ilittelett" ` '� , y' 1` %Poverty to Income Ratio<1 12°io.- Speaking English less than'very 5°i°f _ ` well' 44 vN�PR9uR�`VO T, 1 p Vii, . % %Zero Vehicle Households 6% - V t C^ �. 1�,. .A, . 4; ,F MOBILITY ASSESSMENT FACTORS40;4of'- e i ` PM Peak Traffic Volumes 2,000 vehicles per hour ry ; y '` S.' Conflict Potential between modes High %Perfect Grid(1/2 mile) 34% 1, %of acres with Slopes>4%(1/2 mile) W • ^'''"` ' • • I Average or higher than average compared to other stations ., h 4 r ESTIMATED MOBILITY SOLUTION MARKET DEMAND _ V. Micromobility I= Illi I �?.'_ Bike Share(Docked) Low Demand -1"111111111411k: ,:, _ - Bike Share(Dockless) No Current Demand 1 2 © Electric Bike/Scooter Share High Demand Mir Microtransit The current configuration of Barbur Blvd Existing local roads and low-scale Streetscape improvements along SW 53rd Ave On Demand Shuttles(AV Potential) No Current Demand carries medium traffic volumes,with striped development north of Barbur Blvd will be will create a connection to the PCC-Syvlania Circulator Shuttles(AV Potential) High Demand bike lanes,no sidewalks,and pedestrian converted into a Park&Ride to serve the campus that will accommodate pedestrian, Car Share crossings some distance away from the future future station. cycling,and potential AV shuttle movement. Car Share High Demand station. On Demand Ridehailing Medium Demand A This mode/amenity would help to MARKET Low Demand Q Station Location create connections to the station, DEMAND Medium Demand CONTEXT however it could be accommodated in I High Demand MAP 9' Street View Location a partner agency's right-of-way Source:Mobility Solutions Suitability Assessment,Fehr&Peers 299 Station Existing Conditions: 68th Parkway Station - - The suitability of new mobility services is assessed based on existing land-use,demographic,and physical constraints. Combined,these factors can help indicate the likelihood ,' °• "`•-''$- `-'e"f ''" 1. •- of success in providing a type of first and/or last mile -f r �' ' , 0:4. s4ipiem , +II%---v" .r : s'� connection. 7. r++ �� _ ^' �© `_ E, DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) ■ .. •- - - "_ *" �;; x Total Popula- Total #of Employment Total Households � a.,. � say ' . tion Jobs Sites - �+ '. 3 �} ►-•1�-�= 'w � 'II: , *. 994 986 17 421 f r -'•$.. X .:,44.w I• .�--'.• .+�..rye ._. .`• , _, Ei... _�� - rte"" .r _ f S`, �_ s� ��'; ©' - � I - ': s " ay POPULATION FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) ,,, --,.....--.:.7„,........,'"'' .�� PGE SUBSTATION ; %of Population between ages 5-17 12% ' : rARK 8 RIDE s t '*1 , -_. •w b ;t' %of Population over age of 65 • a7� .•_r — \ %of Jobs with Earnings<$1,250/ 19% r .. -`�._,. month s. 0.Ep ,� with Disability 0.��y 0.0 - X4.7:: ig. - %Minority 15% 1 • %Povertyto Income Ratio 41 12% t .may,-. 1 , . sk . S*, ,,dN ,1 ' i. %Speaking English less than'very 2% B_+ ..- w -.. �. • . well' .-r • - - f .. 14' . . . _. - .__... %Zero Vehicle Households /° ` .%. - MOBILITY ASSESSMENT FACTORS ,' y ,:iiii ,,. t,, + PM Peak Traffic Volumes 3,800 vehicles per hour Conflict Potential between modes High %Perfect Grid(1/2 mile) 61% -- - %of acres with Slopes>4%(1/2 mile) ° 6 . i I Average or higher than average compared to other stations -t LSE ESTIMATED MOBILITY SOLUTION MARKET DEMAND ..__-_ ii x• Micromobility Bike Share(Docked) No Current Demand T- (Dockless)Share ( ) Medium Demand A O © 0 — Electric Bike/Scooter Share Medium Demand A i Microtransit SW 68th Pkwy acts as a gateway into Tigard The current configuration of W Pacific Hwy The auto-oriented nature of W Pacific Hwy On-Demand Shuttles(AV Potential) Low Demand A Triangle,providing a scenic drive through Red carries high traffic volumes,with striped bike creates a pdestrian barrier between the station Circulator Shuttles(AV Potential) Medium Demand A Rock Creek natural area. lanes with nearby bike lane gaps,and minimal and residential neighborhoods to the north of Car Share IP pedestrian crossings. the station. Car Share High Demand M i On Demand Ridehailing ,Low Demand A This mode/amenity would help to MARKET Low Demand Q Station Location create connections to the station, DEMAND Medium Demand CONTEXT however it could be accommodated in I High Demand MAP OJ Street View Location a partner agency's right-of-way Source:Mobility Solutions Suitability Assessment,Fehr&Peers 300 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Station Existing Conditions: Elmhurst Street Station --------- � The suitability of new mobility services is assessed based ,IIS - on existing land-use,demographic,and physical constraints. Combined,these factors can help indicate the likelihood -- -_ "'.=- .`"".= of success in providing a type of first and/or last mile l— . r r : connection. r. v. � y }J? �•. DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) ; �`;INVTotal Total #of Employment Total 7•;.".- — � - 7 ; F: Population Jobs Sites Households '� 'i ` y r 323 2,865 14 167 . ._.y am- , _ r* a b c .,. 7' Ft .1".4.7 a POPULATION FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) VIIIIIIIPP�„�- __ �• � war. �" rte_ A a r X of Population between ages 5-17 13°i° r..�. _ xa %of Population over age of 65 1111 -`• • SW DAR .. ST41,250/_ -' 11`,*' - month .. . - -'� esu. y/4 %with Disability 23°i° _ i. y 0 _:-+wit.t "" --is=�- -rr x Minority 21% t • i /�. Ow i %Poverty to Income Ratio<1 28°i° r _ • 7`>"'. s :~ 10�� M■t; %Speaking English less than'very 4% *.. - •A- --= r well' sWeTMtiva r , Y_ r -- %Zero Vehicle Households 17dll % ;� • 2 ` MOBILITY ASSESSMENT FACTORS r Tom. N,", PM Peak Traffic Volumes 1,700 vehicles per hour ' . s_ ;� Conflict Potential between modes Medium %Perfect Grid(1/2 mile) %of acres with Slopes>4%(1/2 mile) 2% 0a. . '.- r' ' • I Average or higher than average compared to other stations ''` n, yip •4 = - ESTIMATED MOBILITY SOLUTION MARKET DEMAND 1 - - . , -• , • - __ -- Micromobility _ `� ; • Bike Share(Docked) No Current Demand t °+ Bike Share(Dockless) Medium Demand 1 �� .416,,,,, • - Electric Bike/Scooter Share Medium Demand 1 0 O O Microtransi SW 72nd Ave is the primary north-south Parking lots and structures,such as the one Existing conditions along SW 70th Ave On-Demand Shuttles(AV Potential) Low Demand 1 arterial through Tigard Triangle,and provides located at SW Elmhurst St and SW 70th Ave, consist of unimproved roads lacking through Circulator Shuttles(AV Potential) Medium Demand 1 access to major retail,hotel,and office are a typical condition east of the station, connections,consistent sidewalks,and Car Share ir destinations. where there is primarily auto-oriented office bikeways. Car Share No Current Demand and retail. On Demand Ridehailing Low Demand 1 This mode/amenity would help to MARKET Low Demand Q Station Location create connections to the station, DEMAND Medium Demand CONTEXT however it could be accommodated in I High Demand MAP ® Street View Location a partner agency's right-of-way Source:Mobility Solutions Suitability Assessment,Fehr&Peers 301 Station Existing Conditions: Hall Boulevard Station _— The suitability of new mobility services is assessed based = on existing land-use,demographic,and physical constraints. CI—n:4-i.. � ,z - - _ ---- - - Combined,these factors can help indicate the likelihood 7, - `F- •-—.. � �� . -- - of success in providing a type of first and/or last mile t s - , - �. connection. ;-r- ,4: A .; `'''. AT i, r+, 1• #...- ..• 1, le DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) _ i © =' -,;:, SWIAjNsr x, —,� = Total Total #of Employment Total may-- '�;+ 15:1 -rr-r. J. . r` TIGARD TRANSIT CENTER t WES I' ! .may= __ . - . - -" Population Jobs Sites Households �,�E�. m- 5. — f MEe74s. •A- � 866 3,331 13 379 .ft.� •_' - . EOM 'f` ; � .: �� .rr' '_WES COMMWEE0.ta\o-NE SW i� -- Y, 0 �� r POPULATION FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) Yom; _ - _ .., - _, d "%of Population between ages 5-17 13% "� SW SCDmNS ST .- ` `+• '' -- SWxau 85 %of Population over age of 65 13°%° y - ,Lk.- -`_ -._ •,'t^ _ %of Jobs with Earnings<$1,250/ 18°%° 1 - n r: . . .. _ month - f 1' " A. .4.\ :C %with Disability 17% ' Y "`' ,�� _� :w �� :� • -:-ss = %Minority 28% •` �{ T 1-1 . %Poverty to Income Ratio<1 _23% ,;� ..— -- - �� PARK_WRIDE %Speaking English less than'very 7% '• �• • -2-.-- �-- , 'r .. well' -�, +< i %Zero Vehicle Households 9% illillik • x: y111 + - S, 's + :Jk,'ll,�. '. . -f,. '= ' = �n MOBILITY ASSESSMENT FACTORS ' ' - PM Peak Traffic Volumes 1,400 vehicles per hour t • • ra • r.' . '= - Conflict Potential between modes Low y - %Perfect Grid(1/2 mile) 13% of acres with Slopes>4%(1/2 mile) 31% ` 'U Average or higher than average compared to other stations �` �.�,I 'n. ESTIMATED MOBILITY SOLUTION MARKET DEMAND ,..�.,,. _ I Ad'' .y':!"'•�.: .- Micromobility . = - Bike Share(Docked) No Current Demand 7 - —� *'-' =�- _ Bike Share(Dockless)��"y ( ) Medium Demand 1 O2 . — Electric Bike/Scooter Share Medium Demand 1 O icrotransit The current configuration of SW Hall Blvd has The WES Station is located within 1/4 mile of SW Commercial St is a gateway into On-Demand Shuttles(AV Potential) No Current Demand striped bike lanes and sidewalks on only one the station,linking light rail with commuter Downtown Tigard from the station,and carries Circulator Shuttles(AV Potential) No Current Demand side of the road.The road carries mixed auto rail service extending further north and south bus service to and from Tigard Transit Center Car Share and industrial traffic. of the region.The WES rail tracks bisect and WES,which connects riders to Beaverton Car Share Medium Demand Downtown Tigard. and Wilsonville. On Demand Ridehailing Medium Demand i This mode/amenity would help to MARKET Low Demand Q Station Location create connections to the station, DEMAND 1 Medium Demand CONTEXT however it could be accommodated in , High Demand MAP V Street View Location a partner agency's right-of-way Source:Mobility Solutions Suitability Assessment,Fehr&Peers 302 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Station Existing Conditions: Bonita Road Station The suitability of new mobility services is assessed based on existing land-use,demographic,and physical constraints. -_ -. -- Combined,these factors can help indicate the likelihood F •�- . , of of success in providing a type of first and/or last mile '� _ connection. f M rr . ._`f DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) � _ 1114. - Total Total #of Employment Total r = f rL Population Jobs Sites Households - s •Si. `' - I '- :�t 1,093 1,728 14 436 • - •BONITA PARI( `- . - faroroorRttK � �. ��r " '� F« � 0 POPULATION FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) If.....- .,� ,& -_ . - %of Population between ages 5-17 17°%° T • ---N. _;1.• ° N. _ #� %of Population over age of 65 12°%° { r:_. _ %of Jobs with Earnings 41,250/ 10°%° • ��'.0 month 1 r-�-.�' '�'- SW BDNITA RD s ,. A' '_ %with Disability 11% .G ' �• •y,ry = - �` . %Minority 26% r �Q `, %Poverty to Income Ratio<1 17% 1 --____ J %Speaking English less than'very 7°i° 3 ; - _ .� 'fir: well' x .: �� %Zero Vehicle Households 7% ► ' •4` - l_ �, r .; _ -"'"4 Cr-') MOBILITY ASSESSMENT FACTORS le d r 3 ` r PM Peak Traffic Volumes 2,700 vehicles per hour - 1 Conflict Potential between modes Medium %Perfect Grid(1/2 mile) o, %of acres with Slopes>4%(1/2 mile) 49% _ _ ► Average or higher than average compared to other stations ESTIMATED MOBILITY SOLUTION MARKET DEMAND Micromobility 111 1.111- -- 1 ++-1P" __~'_ �` Bike Share(Docked) Low Demand ,, - / _ Bike Share(Dockless) Low Demand Oc.� _.. O 3 Electric Bike/Scooter Share _it No Current Demand 1 =— 2 3 Microtransit The current configuration of Bonita Rd carries The major transit spine through the area Fanno Creek and Bonita Park are located one On Demand Shuttles(AV Potential) No Current Demand medium traffic volumes,with striped bike is located one block east of the station on block west of the station,and will potentially Circulator Shuttles(AV Potential) Low Demand 1 lanes and sidewalks on both sides of the road, SW 72nd Ave,which serves primarily light increase non-motirized connectivity through Car Share and great connectivity to neighborhoods west industrial uses. the area with a planned Fanno Creek Trail Car Share No Current Demand of the station. extension. On Demand Ridehailing Medium Demand 1 1 This mode/amenity would help to MARKET Low Demand Q Station Location create connections to the station, DEMAND Medium Demand CONTEXT however it could be accommodated in , High Demand MAP 9' Street View Location a partner agency's right-of-way Source:Mobility Solutions Suitability Assessment,Fehr&Peers 303 Station Existing Conditions: Upper Boones Ferry Road Station The suitability of new mobility services is assessed based . • _ • -.- •� on existing land-use,demographic,and physical constraints. -J:. at - ,- ,R ; _. ::,x7 `I '' — • - __ _ Combined,these factors can help indicate the likelihood �' - ''� '"'"'" of success in providing a type of first and/or last mile connection. _ • fir: GS Bf _ . •!�'} r -`• '' l�"x-.4.• '" - -. a. —�. ` '.••f FH'AY PNw- �_ E', DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) _ a'o Total Total #of Employment Total f, IA Population obs Sites Households r _ x f 1 916 4,024 7 361 • • amu^ e . - ...•\ ''. rs` - � � •* g�_FEQpV - 0 POPULATION FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) r NES . /p • 1,; ;;... %of Population between ages 5-17 19°i° • -'=' 7-V1 �•�'i _ `` • %of Population over age of 65 7% s" %of Jobs with Earnings<$1,250/ 11% ;� , 0 ""` -• month : `.,.•d •: f ' �'.„ %with Disability 8°i° ' - • - %Minority ° w ity =. ti -.f• °rr t %Poverty to Income Ratio 41 14% s.s ©+ F ' iSpeaking English less than'very 1r well' .•. . • %Zero Vehicle Households 6% w i.MOBILITY ASSESSMENT FACTORS to PM Peak Traffic Volumes 2,000 vehicles per hour - , Conflict Potential between modes Medium %Perfect Grid(1/2 mile) 56% .y %of acres with Slopes>4%(1/2 mile) 39% .•.. • I Average or higher than average compared to other stations 0.,,k. - ESTIMATED MOBILITY SOLUTION MARKET DEMAND r _� } ' Micromobility ilm �. - = �. - • -3-- Bike Share(Docked) Low Demand `� r.� Bike Share(Dockless) Low Demand �� a`� Electric Bike/Scooter Share No Current Demand O © O Microtransit it , SW Upper Boones FerryRd bisects the slit- SW Upper Boones FerryRd acts as a gatewayThe major transit spine through the area is On Demand Shuttles(AV Potential) No Current Demand pp p pp p g 1 Circulator Shuttles(AV Potential)station,with 4 lanes and sidewalks into Tigard from the 1-5 on/off ramps,as well located one half block west of the station on Medium Demand 1 along both sides.The arterial slopes steeply as from residential neighborhoods to the east SW 72nd Ave,which serves primarily light Car Share _ downward to the west from its high point at in Lake Oswego. industrial uses. Car Share No Current Demand the 1-5 interchange. On Demand Ridehailing No Current Demand A This mode/amenity would help to MARKET Low Demand Q Station Location create connections to the station, DEMAND Medium Demand CONTEXT however it could be accommodated in I High Demand MAP OJ Street View Location a partner agency's right-of-way Source:Mobility Solutions Suitability Assessment,Fehr&Peers 304 SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT:CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Station Existing Conditions: Bridgeport Transit Center The suitability of new mobility services is assessed based - on existing land-use,demographic,and physical constraints. -- - Combined,these factors can help indicate the likelihood :' - s = of success in providing a type of first and/or last mile x connection. yr' i• ar . .r• .+.r..c..- w _ - . �- 0 DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) -� r. '(f •- ��FPp -ru% E+t _ _•+�--, Total Total #of Employment Total Population Jobs Sites Households r i• i til-- % © �.� 1,247 4,859 12 514 } PARK R.RIDE/TRANSIT(ENTER , -�` SEvy ' �- -.. . _ _ POPULATION FACTORS(1/2 MILE WALKSHED OF STATION) LOWER BOONES FERRY RD �'•"'� �`rl- � . tti� AKS. s - .`► Y• ` - f- - 0 t .•_ of Population between ages 5 17 20°i° ■ Y • r %of Population over age of 65 5% ' ` ' ` � �,. j •!► N %of Jo bs with Earnings<$1,250/ 18 V ir % �i � month ` 4 � %with Disability9% .m. a ._ • may' -0 u ' . . \ .-C. -,.q %Minority 46% 'g'1,4. . ` %Poverty to Income Ratio<1 17% +� • - - %Speaking English less than'very 12°i° - -- srRFf, well' .11111. ,4 %Zero Vehicle Households 5% •r ° `' - . a MOBILITY ASSESSMENT FACTORS i .+ /,i..;�� it. ' , a _ - _ +�— •_.•: PM Peak Traffic Volumes 1,600 vehicles per hour ■• , + ;: Conflict Potential between modes Medium %Perfect Grid(1/2 mile) 69% - ,z:,; x --- i %of acres with Slopes>4%(1/2 mile) 25% I Average or higher than average compared to other stations «aa r — ESTIMATED MOBILITY SOLUTION MARKET DEMAND • i r ' 3 • .r � �6- =? -+-_ Micromobility —77..:.,_:..-_-===- -.;;,_;-,,, ,�_ �. - _ Bike Share(Docked) Low Demand \ ; _ - Bike Share(Dockless) No Current Demand s `ice rt' Electric Bike/Scooter Share Low Demand 0 O Microtransit SW Lower Boones Ferry Rd acts as a gateway The current configuration of SW 72nd Ave The area surounding Bridgeport Transit Center On Demand Shuttles(AV Potential) No Current Demand into the confluence of Tigard,Tualatin, carries low traffic volumes,with striped and consists of an internal network of arterials, Circulator Shuttles(AV Potential) High Demand Durham,and the lifestyle retail center at partially buffered bike lanes,and sidewalks on access roads,and parking lots that directly Car Share ` . Bridgeport Village. both sides of the street. serve nearby retail destinations. Car Share Medium Demand On Demand Ridehailing High Demand ■ A This mode/amenity would help to MARKET Low Demand 9 Station Location create connections to the station, DEMAND Medium Demand CONTEXT however it could be accommodated in , High Demand MAP 9' Street View Location a partner agency's right-of-way Source:Mobility Solutions Suitability Assessment,Fehr&Peers / Vi1 y Alloppyw 11 J Yt Now1p ,,s........... -......\.,,_�' a ps i+��l� 1 { 1 — i s� prem I ry - - .;A � r _Iiii ^J 016.' dad r _ "7� f" . ��Jt�l �F � � _ — I ��_: 4, September 22, 2020 ' __ The Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project Tigard City Council Gary Pagenstecher Jeb Doran Guy Benn Dave Unsworth City of Tigard TriMet TriMet TriMet-• 14 '� GREAT PLACES A. JJL` orri � or TRI ® MET Metro cu! _�_ n.,�.Pe.,.oA a Marham 44 rccnco Project Timeline Jun 2018 Draft Environmental Impact Station (DEIS) Nov 2018 Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Summer 2020 Final Draft - Conceptual Design Report (CDR) Nov 2020 Metro Regional Funding Measure Jan 2021 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) 2021 Early Construction Begins CDGREAT PLACES Corridor 2 Tonight's Agenda • Project Updates for Council Resolution: o Summary of Conceptual Design Report (Final Draft) o Status of Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) items o Direction to Resolve Outstanding Design Issues • Next Steps 031)GREAT LACES Corridor 3 Focus Areas 1 . 68t" Parkway Station 2. 70th Ave Public Realm 3. Elmhurst Street Station 4. Hwy 217 Bridge with Integrated Multi-use Path (Station Access Project #30) 5. Downtown Station Optimization for MUP 6. Elevated Structures (five in Tigard) Identified with star in presentation 031)GREAT LACES Corridor 4 • Project Overviewi_Li werARR GU NTY MULTNOMAHCOUNTY - a- .Min Tanashourn ei + 400 ...m..._,000 people AmharGlen � ^.,, €'oa!ard cau•was--,�,a Gresham Beaverton I-I t";1 +260,000 jobsi. Washlare :.r F nrll Square4 � Ctarkamaz in the region by 2040 ( Sllnt otnur Corfitnt I girl Rail MAVVVES Commuter Rart °iiAitit . L . Central City CLACXAMAS • Regional Cerner 11 COUNTY y' • Town Center ` — County Aconrlarfes f f 'oIiipe ■E.. v 1t4r - / — '`R - . t ,_,-, I. , fit' :_ 411. ' �iPlf URI IS .ice JC.- f a,,.- S/ `.7 if in a Gig; „i 1 til 9 Equity Local Climate & Housing Economy & Environment GREAT PLACES 4,ip Corridor 5 Project Overview & Connections DOWNTOWN PORTLAND Portland Transit Mall: The project coordinates with Connection to MAX lines, 405 A planned improvements for the Portland Streetcar and buses • SW Naito Parkway Main Street- Beaverton Ross Island Bridgehead Project 13 TC WES Marquam Hill Connector: • Gibb 26 An inclined elevator from Gibbs Marquam Hill Connector o O Aerial Street Station to Marquam Hill Newbury&Vermont Viaducts: ,_ _ Tram will connect the 18,000 patients, Two 100-year-old viaducts on SW •Hamilton employees,students and Barbur Blvd will be replaced with residents that visit the campus seismically sound structures, Stations every day making them safer for all users BEAVERTN SharedTransitway:Bases An improved SW Barbur Blvd traveling to/from destinations streetscape with landscape,sidewalks • to the west will be able to skip • 13th traffic from SW Capitol Highway and raised protected bike lanes19th so are Pordedi atedtr Mat- nl30 mm n 'Hall/Nimbus WES • sharing a dedicated transit-only so Taylors Ferry Rd 30th lane with light rail Tigard Transit Center: O Downtown Tigard will have more Barbur Transit Center transportation choices with improved bus connections and o 53rd = Bridgeport Village the new MAX station,a shortS W PORTLAND walk from the WES station O68th N'i a To Downtown Portland Tigard Transit • t.. - SE PORTLAND � Center/WES O Elmhurst � Hall SW 53rd Ave Improvements ma for people biking and walking, with a potential shuttle to TIGARD PCC-Sylvania,the college's 99W m largest campus Bonita y • Oswego Lake 37 , 500 Upper Boones Ferry Bridgeport entero Bridgeport Transit trips per day by 2035 increase capacity for regional EC. Southwest Corridor Light Rail commuters and bus connections to create seamless regional - streetscape Improvements TUALATIN connections o.••• Connection Improvements •Tualatin WES © Park&Ride Other Rail Transit 6 Major Freeway V Summer Engagement ReportC,130`��e e`�` • Durham City Council • Wash Co. CPO4M Steering Committee Community • Historic Resource Virtual Event Advisory 'Committee • Tigard Transportation Advisory Management& (CAC) Committee Technical Staff ► • Southwest Corridor CAC ee�e0 • Virtual office hours via Zoom _Every 3rd „r Tuesday of the month • Response to Tigard Transportation Upcoming Presentations: Advisory Committee Letter Tigard Downtown Alliance — September 24, 2020 • Response to Tigard Town Center Advisory Commission Letter Wash Co. CPO4K — September 28, 2020 Link to CDR Final Draft distributed CAC — October 1, 2020 to all committees Tigard Town Center Advisory Commission - October 14, 2020 TriMet Staff Office Hours - Tuesday, October 20, GREAT PLACES Corridor 5:30-7 p.m. 7 Conceptual Design Report (CDR) : Final Draft What changed? Jan 2020 �`^ 7T I • More on station access by all ' 1/4 modes, including bikes and future - , • , .4l,, mobility services �. ; • Additional "toolkits" indicating SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORTS;dor intention for project scope and design elements (ex: structures) r.r0- ,,- r- -. 0 4. 0 1E it • Responds to comments received =- through community engagement Aug 2020 process [EFL 1 '' . _ 1 s=_III. 1..i i • More information on how project ' .4r :` & partners intend to fulfill - 1— affordable housing commitments SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL PROJECT CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT ©Corridor GREAT PLACES ® r ' _._.L 0 IS C) Corridor M 8 12 PERCENT AUTO . 4 Station Access Framework 23 PERCENT TRANSFER 65 PERCENT WALK - 0 —PO Potential 7035Bus Network Po re auu•il! -Portland iransaMalV D4WN7G nlnN• POREI: i •Gibbs •GEhhs imnnr" .t1 F':.•mrtimm.e•m•• •Hamilton • ••amllteo Cs' DEAVERTON •HamiIi three-mile hike .Tum Pomm it • n�• E_ --...rt cgPFD catchment area nsxmrix•W�nl;,1 • jar„,,.rE � � • •' luau ` fts lath', r • • • Custer • Ih a•enw1? """•- 19th ma O :, rAor❑analt C- er L 41139911uTnpsil Cerner 0 53 !GARS r •d� - 68 TIGAR�i ( lik ' OBarhurT tJ =IvV Transit Center ,V n once • /' O 53rd '�"mHa,p• • bust O Umhurd 68th SW PORTLAND tun.... - nwam• ii 'm• •oomr bpm �!,\ nr.auen..a •Elmhurst 80.. • d •. �1 . o — Helly • e..,,,„ upper Bp¢n¢s — o $�'� • BrEu apo; ,.-ee! m•irt.�ez - •.flirt,- °- Bonita TYPES m• a.s Upper Beones Ferry• © surface Pan3Rlde , I • • ,• omni Nice sfn� 15 �i TIJALATIN ® Structured Parka Ride ,1.- aro a.,1 .r M _ Bridgeport Transit y. mriaai6o,.cxrre,�aaa 4 Center � Walk Transfers Pick-up/Drop-off Park & Rides Barbur Transit Center up to 300 53rd Avenue up to 310 68th Avenue up to 350 Hall Boulevard up to 100 GREAT PLACES 0 Corridor Bridgeport Transit Center up to 960 Total Spaces I up to 2,020 c4 Walk: Transit-oriented Development (TOD) City-led effort, TriMet supported TOD studies to guide alignment design and project outcomes; O Elmhurst Station/ 70th Ave -- o Hall Station o 68th Parkway Station �; � 0••• ■■ i: ;I; 1 in 1 '{'::M 0111' ■1 . Elmhurst Station TOD__ DARTMOUTH lei 'e" .l... n :C City of Tigard - Preferred Alignment rr +MI 0No J 1 I—pi� !�_ — __ Attwell -Tigard A ""� -- i: H - IL_j 1p 0 1 lot ill ;111 ,— — -� 13 0 0 o it I - itiPirgi r afir��-�`e e ��4 .Ifs jJ �i�id� i,!i '`. I1 ifilligni; 6,1. �_= M. _ -I a t- __-_-pro ini. - II 01 o iiiio ■� 1::— r-r_. ,&.. -111M' - a flZl r 4 Mobility Services : Station Area Planning • Connect to transit • Adapt to travel choices • Serve vulnerable population A. New Transit-Oriented Places • Flexible space B. Adapting Existing Places • Partnerships; City's & Providers C. Adapting the Right-of-Way D. Adapting Park & Rides ti A E. Public Realm r, rH - } ' �L moi" 8i 7„- / — •¢Y- 1 GREAT PLACES0 i L. - �� n �_ ^., \ -' =T: Corridor Opportunity areas along the light rail alignment for mobility solutions 11 c4 Partnerships: Station Access 66th `r ) 7 projects Tigard/Tualatin: sw ° ° • Will receive environmental .0, _�0. „,� ca -T clearance a,, Downtown •Elmhurst *Taro' m - • Seeking funding 51.athol cy'G q -...0 Cethori� i� O Chorch ��. M1 1 Tigard/ Tualatin Spring POutreach: SW m.sQ„Id,t - BPa;k • Community support for: 8°°tra Boni (SA25) 72nd Sidewalks o and Bikeway, a Upper Boon Ferfy , , (SA26) Hall Sidewalks, SW Suiham Rd y Tigard * (SA30) 217 Multi-use High School O e Pathway Coale Park ] wyra,� , Bridgeport Transit Center fFqure m downtown — A ToaO9t4n 17 0 GREAT PLACES Corridor 12 Design Elements 9 Overhead Structures 4.2 Stations and Platforms % 0 Creating Places at Stator,. _ - r i I i IF ..��. �� m s $ lJrI m Design Elements .: ' f 0 Walls `t'. _ Jd - _ e� rf Y !r•. ��+r v �/' 0 Stormwater Features - 1 I iiii: a.3 Alignment design I — i - b �� = / ' 1 .e 4.5 6peratlons Equipment and _ r 0.- iv;:- ' ag.1111# O Facilities = 4.8 Bike Facilities and Protected —_ _ inter en( i L 4.9 Light Rail Intersections " t . 40 ..__te r 4.4 Trm kway Type ' — {.: Tom` r — , C::3r Station Access Toolkit _ TM 0 GREAT PLACES Corridor 13 Urban Design Toolkits Standard Transit Elements 1 _ I' —Y 'ak si 1. f .ori►" 0) GUIDE TO STANDARD LIGHT RAIL I TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS IN I'› St Stations & Public Space PUBLIC STREETS STATION ELEMENTS'.SIGNAGE SWAYFI WING PUBLIC REALM PUIMC REALM STAT ION ELEMENTS:PASSEN 6E AMENITIES .� iL 1 rt I TRI MET "�'' ; }r �''IP ti Fr. ' ■ !d��Jil�l ! i r MINIM I NE`c. ,� � �ulr �� ,..., 1 11 ., Gd IR�jL i , 1 i k ZIT":.1 -- I:VI;St�A FIP NOS IR iSRL S l0.4" F.M5I 5 C5 L FCA.=VNO UPDATE FEBRUARY,2017 w�., 11,.=�«,,�K..LL i Ili 2 Ilk ir MUT, _ c______ .1 b I I, poilio __.. 4 . GREAT PLACES• NILFP N�Lr.ti I -n.-nti�F:,eNIVALe; L z orri or 14 .... Urban Design Toolkits Systems Walls WWII. ..19..... . I ___------:- :'..'''....'.:-. 7- . 1 _:.. g..--- •-- . '• • Via' - i'•:-':- -- . I ' : . *a ',.Eir• tri".-..-,-_-- ' " .. - ,!. ripg•--i - • ji L____ . - • _ .. 1.iii 1.- ,. 1• g •-. , ......, . ni 1 • ,.,T., , • . --•.:.!-''. t , 4itil&k:1114! ** , • ' IFII r ,.. >,.. • 7 , ... ) ,.. int-.77,17L*1 ..„.., . . ..--,-,_-_:,!:_ 4'. ..., 1 - PLI4L-- 14..• .. ..f.... 7.7-. 5-• FE 4,,oti L .:...----;;:,---, 7,.:4, !,,t7 ,. "tIrri*Ilts.[. 111) ••• •,.',.....F.,,.,•.11.'1 r• 5,51.5BUILEING-611111,1,, lu.c. .......,d... Trackwav * Bridges/ Structures II - i .. . t.... ! ; ---77- 1 .111L..6 T.'111,............. ----- 1 k ...._., i .. r, ....,..; 1 ___- /,....• ti..4.104.4... 1 Or , re —. k:N&'.. 0010111,14.11f1M1.111.E.A111# — .11.*', 'ff. ==1-L;APIIIIII .- .._,._. -i P.,.......-- , '''li 110i. .-- '. >1- I.illrg •_E-2. _0.-IN.:. •'.-- , : • .• _. i . Ail ---,- --7--'.--...;.• -- -• ..•_• - • ••,. 1„:••'!"--- 1 -" ,... ... - ,• i•_..•- - . . ••• ••,•z 1,., •„,,„.),..„rifiAth-1 ••••:_. •• L...- , 1 ... '. •- - •' ..., -. I. . ,.. .. r . 0 GREAT PLACES Corridor 15 1 -5 & Pacific Hwy/99W crossing : sketch view '. i� I -� / 1, ' ., j .4 _ i ,i• $ I+ i • - 1t% ^ '. x. .,.� kw.'' 4 •tr, � "' r t i . V .`n t4 ,'r i,tit-i t ti+ '1.... a •,ayN s it.w ? ,i ...t 1 , ~a ^(..�1,�� 6-4- . !y ,9 y icy ' 5 ? Ie'^ 4„ ' y! sic .•, f' y r� t -• '�'kt4 / moi"^ °0- � - ! 4^ - + w+: - r .. f.^ // /{\� 0946,, I ' / '� i `•.x.-:. j .....,_..0 ,,,i IfMNwYf 99N i/r/ •� ','�� C..' ;.� •..}{tY$ •+' ' � •a • r^s _alp r. , . . „, .,- ..... • .„„,,,. t ,... , ... • A., . ....-..- ... ,.., ,..,.. - . . „A., - ,• . - ._viw.„, , . .. ..I • -f .I J ley;�/+.' , � 1 � .` •', ' .. ' "''''' 1."' ' ' 7, : - ...::I. _ ' :.' ' ... Ire- J— -f' .: \ Vii... :,*.,IS:\\n_ .., let•., ^ 0 GREAT PLACES Corridor 16 68th Parkway Station * Design Values: Shell ------_ - • Transit-oriented g' Gator's � s PUL and \� � � Eatery - Development (TOD) %'- - = " • Potential project implementation of/ - • Banniranf P I n - • 99W Ped/Bike Facilities rr 7estaurant8 enhanced pedestrian mid-block crossing � / • Pie House (Approvals required by OOOT and City of V" • //Tigard) . --,-,--A„, Safe crossings of 99w r � ...„.. .,.......0.1., � - " '� at 68th and 64th :- ',1, Potential mid-block 16. �y,q „ow ,,,��' © ® �,,!�� _li crossing- Coronado a,y • ,-,® Contextual design for ./ • su 68th Parkway/RR Creek d ,-f �� .,. is Structure s-. %///%/�/I III —.___ - , _.. �E / // to /F/i/ III � - -. .. , ,, {4 - - • _ / Surface Parka ace - 1- ' / it / •with up to 350 spaces "? -1 ' t. 1 .. ,,T, t_ iiiii i — . - _ f B 0 GREAT PLACES Corridor 17 7Qth * ,,,,,, , ! _1 ,\\,,,, i. ae Ave , , , Storage] vi It'./ -\---. 1 i ' ic •• Desi n Values: 'r -f . • • CWS Stormwater Standards (Stream Resiliency) ' • 70t" Ave scope' 'P5 • Tigard's preferred streetscape concept # ` 1., 9 p p � Oreg n, • Contextual design for Red Rock Creek & . +`,Aau taiian• n ' . ,� Dartmouth structures - a I / TtiMet and City of Tigard discussing potential SW 70th Ave Section over Red Rock Creek Extension to future SW Atlanta St rt r� ilr..,arnorroorlruu��nlrir��r�uurrl�n�rrrrrlor ` '. Street regrading and ' �"" %reconstruction of sidewalks 4 �v1 � �,- Red Rack Creek ir� � - Figure 7.5,3 * I "'.w Retl Rock Creek Trail ;;ilfllil'1 CI Expansion �� Section of SW 70th Ave . =- _ Tualatin - New or Enhanc valley Fire i Project Elemer Rescue Roach At-grade pedestrian and bike gpi Dartmouth St Sidew ¢�i. improvements at SW Dartmouth - 0 New/E -- a I -i v4'ry,w St and SW 70th Ave intersection,- j E Gated . rte ,��;,,:„.„- crossing type and location to be j! ((}h determined \ Light rail bridge over Crass ({ yy_ ,� �� LYtI.rS`.4Wl'! SW Dartmouth St - - Enhar Figure 7-5A—' •LJ Crass — Sidewalk �SW70thAve Trackway SidewalkPrOje[ Shared Street Bike Facilities Elmhurst Street Station ili 111 i3) Ii ill Ill' II�Jririr aIQ w ii1,1 7f 4 1 _ _ - _ -- a SW Elnhursl St 2 -31µflmlrurst5300 0 w I. _ 11.11�� : i in n r STATION FEATURES 11 igere 7.5+N ■ I �� Q7 Center platform 74 ]l 6 O Improved SW Elmhurst St-rebuilt street,sidewalks and % _i ; w 2 stormwaterfaciluies - H ® Improved street and streetscape along SW 70th Ave — 1 0 Gated Crossing - 1 05 Potential systems building location © Intersection designed for integration with future Design Values: expansion of SW 70th AvetolheSouth • Transit-oriented Development (TOD) E _ .. M 000 "� • Integration of stormwater facilities Rt iai y `/,..: 1110141 • Platform configuration & optimization 0 ' , • 72"d Intersection Consolidation , , ; • Future integration of 217 MUP // -, GREAT PLACES 11 t5.,,t 0 Corridor „goo ° 3 OR 217 crossing : sketch view Design Values: viaiik +_ _'A 1."(7 .: , ,.r k;, '' • Contextual design �,. � `° • for structure over `� 4� iii . _ i .. =4. Hwy 217 a f_ _ter_, �+. I., , • -t'e- .� ' Darfn 1 ,� rR .. ;""�+` Integration of ;,, . "'" '.� . :A Station Access �:Y � . 4 Project (SA30) 217 _ • _ M U P N _ `,i c .„..,:„ . .., .Illogier:OR-.217_ 7 - ..- . ... , ,,, .,.,, ' ' , or . •.,44 4011111 . + , sw0g -NL.,..? f.- x,47 iq �� 44t Y�L • a TI- ----------, fs1• 1. F �.+ _ t • ,i iii "."'''..?,e iiii. 4 1r ti 4 a \\ `A r. CDGREAT PLACES Corridor 20 Hall Boulevard Station Design Values: • Transit-oriented Development TOD _ f _ • Integration of stormwater facilities L • Hall Blvd- Ped/Bike Facilities 1111111111111111i --- I • OM F/ Park & Ride • Accommodating bus transfers =�((4j� ® SW 9ColfinS S' -�> ) • Traffic mitigation 6° I IPEatfonn ---Project Boundary Landscape =track _ \ y Pmentias Stormwater •-- Crossing Gale r T Treatment ----Existing RohlofWay \f [r New)Improved New/Improved \ ( ?EPT/Sidewalk Roadway / NewSignal/Enance hd Q Shared Transitway Pedestrian Ballasted Track Crossing Potential Bike Parking Q Iblcniial Hes Sinp 4,27 • samse aaacBw. ▪ ®,Translnio ' q ` wleyup rotosspocea Commut Third vackway�rovides V.ghi rail the vehicles operations cess mthao ante fac d • �' � mainlenancefawMy.. � �= G!oAir1cIu ET LCES agntr 041. Humphries -./� , � °wallop and Mai :mom • Labs Fxilav isoe figure 7 8]E Bonita Road Station 1 Q ._,_..1:4„,-.,... „..________-__„,..:,....-_, y e -. tiy. IrB ' f - 1G � ifrYN�rIrf IE " �r 4` •eY�-� Bonita1 Park \ 1 \ \ ' ib \1 ` I \ % W r f l r,� ` I .... ■►1r■ , v 1.'' i j p WO _ ®' °�, Design Values: % - �`.,131 II© Integration of m Bonit. �. Wel 91 cmi�r� '��.�i�`. stormwater facilities Contextual design ' for elevated station SW Bonita Rd , a,.._ i rii '� t , = Wayfinding/ access `' • to Fanno Creek ,1MEMMIEME Connection \ \ \ •• \\ \ \ \ 4 \\ \ I Portland Compressor I \\ \ \ 22 Upper Boones Ferry .. T Road Station - ,- ' \ MVV/ „ ,„ j_____\ No oi col /,, - E i , " �'-44.'-- 4,_ 0 s o ' Design Values: * \, • Integration of ," 6\ -ate stormwater facilities 9y� ,`j �e`y¢� o • Safe crossing of °¢s \ 72nd and Upper -',,,, 11‘AA\ %, Boones Ferry Traffic mitigations 5 ��.• ^� < • Potential future expansion of Upper Boones Ferry 0 23 , Men's Warehouse I J I Bridgeport Transit Intersection I j Improvm emenls Center McCormick E. bedetermined Sohmias a // Design Values: eN, $ 19' , • Support Tualatin's land use vision & �A / ` Transit-oriented Development (TOD) ..., / • Integration of stormwater facilities _. „,# • Safe ped/bike access to and within \ �4 /I , a station - 8 • 72nd Intersection improvements IllageInn _ 1J 1 ''—'.ENO �4 I kYs�'! rl f I, 1;_P - — '2P 0DO P1 f p)fes' /} eWY�Q- W .y14& '-, i Wi I�� MAX . � ��- � �� =_� mt. " FSC -..! F = _ ii `' f it /3 GREAT PLACES .a \ f -�� C) Corridor '-� Next Steps • Transit-oriented development work plan/ station optimization: a 68th, Elmhurst, and Hall Stations • Publish FEIS • Advance design to 60% 2011-2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021 Planning Design •30°i 60°i• 90°i• Testing and training Draft Conceptual Design Report Final Draft Conceptual Design Report Environmental Review Construction Draft Final Federal Funding Service begins Get Moving 2020 Federal funding September 2027 measure November 2020 GREAT PLACES Corridor 25 Questions? Comments? trimet.org/swcorridor TRI6bNIET +W��n' Metro r °PF=..,ro. \ 7 --,- „,, 0 GREAT PLACES Corridor AIS-4375 7. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 09/22/2020 Length (in minutes): 20 Minutes Agenda Title: Consider Approval of the Final Refreshed Strategic Plan Prepared For: Nicole Hendrix, City Management Submitted By: Nicole Hendrix, City Management Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Receive an overview of the final strategic plan refresh based on feedback received from the community in July and approve the final version attached. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends approving the final refreshed strategic plan. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Refreshed vision: Tigard:• an equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. Updated strategic priorities: 1. Set the standard for excellence in public service and customer experience. 2. Create a well-connected, attractive, and accessible pedestrian network. 3. Ensure development and growth support the vision. Public Input In July 2020, staff gathered public input on the draft vision and priorities, receiving a total of 175 survey responses (99 from staff/committees & 76 from community). •91% support the vision. •92% support the strategic priorities. •90% agreed that the vision accurately reflects community values. •137 comments were provided (through surveys and social media). Background In 2014, the City's first strategic plan was adopted to guide the City's decisions, policies and priorities for the next 20 years. Tigard's existing character and its future direction of change led to an ambitious strategic vision:The most walkable community in the Pacific Northwest where people of all ages and abilities enjoy healthy and interconnected lives. Since its adoption, the City has been working toward this vision by working to accomplish four goals: 1. Facilitate walking connections to develop an identity. 2. Ensure development advances the vision. 3. Engage the community through dynamic communication 4. Fund the vision while maintaining core services. Since 2015, the city has made progress in achieving the vision and goals, through everything from an inventory of sidewalks; to creation of community events; to projects and development that encourage health and walking; to investments in Safe Routes to School; Tigard Walks!; Volunteer Tigard!; and a 2020 levy focused on police services. In the last two years, work has been focused internally and through a community survey to understand what our community knows and sees about this vision, and point to changes that should be made. In 2019, we began an update of the strategic plan to acknowledge: •Work on the vision and goals has been underway for give years and much has been accomplished. •It is time to determine what the city's future direction of change should be. •Internal understanding for implementation of the plan needed to be refreshed. The refresh of the strategic plan included an internal and external analysis of the current state; data from the 2019 Performance Audit and external sources about what Tigard will face in the future; and progress in achieving citywide and Council goals and priorities. An evaluation of the implications of this information was done to see what new directions the city should take. Many discussions about the concepts and words that should be emphasized in an updated vision were discussed. Through this work, a new internal guidance team was formed to draft an updated vision and goals. The Strategic Plan Guidance Team members will present the final plan for Council approval. The product of this refresh is a final draft with updated vision and goals (attached to this staff report). What we heard during the process of updating the plan is that our plan should have more measurable outcomes, more engagement and enrollment of city staff as the implementers are needed, and emphasize concepts of equity, safety, and climate action in the future. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Direct staff to adjust language or design before approving the refreshed strategic plan. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Strategic Plan - Citywide Vision & Strategic Priorities The Strategic Plan is the guiding document for master plans, policies, and goals. DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 06/16/2020 Tigard Strategic Plan Refresh Update Attachments Strategic Plan 2020-2025 Presentation City of Tigard STRATEGIC PLAN 2. 020-2C � 5 sr, 1 . .. . . . ..., I'o �� {� I ii . I .. �j11� • . „..j. 1 ,r, 1 _ . .: I . .• ., . , ,• : ..,.., • . • ..., ,.. 4 1 . • N. i ippkikk . 1' IIEl 1 - : ' ., .,4 1 We1cotne tolkii ,j,e,,,,,,oi �' „OKI 1 ) .._ .. . . . I li ....; •• �T`IAl : i :: - c \ •'' A Place to Call Home •*�+ ,.. . yr E ,. .. - l a•�'' �,: .„ __, • 'fes±..``Na.rEY.Wt ti i.1 r r ��.•�`s.;•. ��i. �'- -.: yrs 4' ' �•� Y`s ry ra'y "t- V..ey� k'{�iljl31 i■;•...+ya ,... „........,.._..., .. . •: •......7,„.„... .il . -.i .11 ,c. . , .,,,t ,... , _ ..... I - � �L,,',' .'s 14:.5 /r �� i.; - r.w .M,p+r, ,,_yr x.- Y.[�''--‘4.,...1..:...47-4,.. N.,'.r,C,. ,.---------=---:r A •i I vir 20 II• 0 , ....-1...111iii:--.1-'.. .... -:) ....• A:,,.... li . •,.., imiyi 40 . 1., ii.. .. , Agri •-.-....,• •: ts, irj -iiii„ — trla.-- . ,fr •.....-.'/ : trEllir II: icif'4. , , .... -...-, diirr' ilk .:,..4' N . :L. . A R 0fl T I GARD r . t .. #' •t'c , • j ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS fir ,„,c4L, . ABLE OF Refreshing a city's strategic plan, which guides the direction of our city's future, is no small feat. _..'•. 6x7...4),... CONTENTS Thank you to every individual and group who with their passion and determination created a -' ' '+ 'Iry • .•• r1..: .'' +l - lasting impact on our community through this plan. _ t.• _ - - 4e•A , ' — Introduction - „. - • ; ( Tigard City Council Strategic Plan Implementation Team - - • . ; g r v 1 br Mayor Jason Snider Allison Arnold, Council President John Goodhouse Readers Services Manager* • • Councilor Tom Anderson Kenny Asher, .4 # ' ;_ . •' Councilor Heidi Lueb Community Development Director !_ _�— ,fi• • • Councilor Liz Newton Dana Bennett, . ' .~ Vision Youth Councilor Emilio Calderon Human Resources Director' Carol Krager, .s' Mayor John Cook* g . gi Councilor Marc Woodard* City Recorder -s �• - Chief Kathy McAlpine, Youth Councilor Meghan Turley* Police Chief `.° � �� i • Strategic Plan Guidance Team Mike Nolop, ' • Information Technology Manager ”' • Amber Bell, iI • Readers Services Manager Kathy Nyland, e r • • Assistant City Manager '� - - 9 1 � • Joanne Bengtson, , + , , `. . • City Management Executive Assistant Brian Rager, I STRATEGIC STRATEGIC STRATEGIC Public Works Director Tegan Enloe, _ .��" . PRIORITY 1 PRIORITY 2 PRIORITY 3 Senior Project Engineer Paula Walker, _ Library Communications Coordinator* ., Nicole Hendrix, ,-_, , ' EP 16 City Management Senior Management Analyst Kent Wyatt, �� .�. Communications ManagerIIPPIP =r• .....±4 �..., '• Steve Kang, . wr- • -'.- Finance Senior Management Analyst Eric Zimmerman, .. ` ` r. ::. •• Assistant City Manager* •,r - ' " • Carol Kragen ` -' • City Recorder :{ ... -'`'` • Brandi Leos, Project Consultant - it Summary 1 Barbara McMahon, ~ .- _ ... .. rt Senior Human Resources Business Partner . Eggie Maldonado, McMahon Consulting, LLC `'',: ,� _ 26 Permit Technician Assistant = • - F- F--•r All City Boards and Committees x�-_'. ,;gie f .4-. • Jamey McDonald, - . nom.,.•, • Police Commander 1 • Tom McGuire, - • • • y�i 4_- '� _• • :,. - Glossary Assistant Community Development Director :';' , -7, Martin McKnight, _., " • i:� /"`'''''''' Parks Supervisor .,.1-,0, . rgi Christine Moody, A.- .� - Purchasing Manager `;. '•,`' •oN ` ,. , • GaryPagenstecher, `.' ` . "._ • Project Planner •.t Y :, i.;4'- '"*'� • f Appendix Lloyd Purdy, 'i. ,,�.rs .. y ,�- • Economic Development Manager .' ,4 `' ¢.e�.,� a ' •., ^+r- .• ' 'it,. • .. ' ...fes�' Marty Wine, - .-1,. r -° -4 r` -I' City Manager *Former 1 ) k'`r i '''� '6'1$/4 1 14µ,y.7 _ :• 'i ; ,F '[ j1•" A, ..„0.0001,t;irt A note from our City Manager 1 ',„ .: ;, r . . A Refresh OUR N/ ISION , 4r In 2019, the City embarked on a journey to refresh Tigard's Strategic Plan, last updated in 2015. The purpose of a strategic IL: ' - 'itt: 4 ... plan is to set a focus for how the city's vision and direction will A vision highlights where we want to go as a city and be achieved. It is a road map to guide where we are going and what we want to be. Our new vision emphasizes equity, convey what our city aspires to be. A strategic plan helps an walkability, health, and accessibility. + organization allocate resources, set priorities, and states what ...--11.0: ' ;i�% it will say yes to. i 47 In order to understand the state of the vision and goals, xcommunity members and city staff were interviewed, surveyed, r t % , Ir. and asked about what the city's future direction should be Tigard: An equitable community now. We are presenting a 2020 refreshed plan that will guide City Manager, Marty Wine us for the next 5 years, through 2025. We are updating the that is walkable, healthy, plan in an unprecedented year, when we are all experiencing unimaginable events, and working in ways we had not planned r for. Demands on our city and community are different than and accessible for everyone. we could have expected, knowing that this plan will probably need to change during its lifetime. COVID-19 and the uprising for racial equity have shifted and created greater focus for the city's strategic plan in the following ways: Framing the Vision • "Most walkable"has become a priority that has greater focus on healthy, equitable outcomes. • Equity — Just and fair inclusion into a society in which all can participate, prosper, and reach their full potential.' • The need for our whole city organization to enroll in the plan has led to one internal-facing priority. • Walkability — A walkable environment supports and allows • The need to measure our progress has prompted much for a choice to participate in active forms of transportation more specific priorities, objectives and metrics to make our such as cycling and includes people traveling with planned actions clear. or without a mobility aid. A walkable community is foundational to an equitable and sustainable community. 2 The city organized a committee representing every city department, called the Guidance Team. This group's purpose • Accessibility — Providing equivalent ease of use and is to finish updating the strategic plan and be the people who opportunity for all people to interact with our services, would ensure that the plan will be implemented. The Guidance processes, and infrastructure. Team, together with the leadership of every city department, are responsible for ensuring that the plan gets done and that • Healthy — Supporting the community's physical, economic, city staff and community members are engaged making the and environmental well-being which improves all aspects plan a reality. We are excited to bring energy and commitment of health. to carrying out these priorities going forward. I Definition by PolicyLink 2 Inspired by America Walks definition \-41144*,era• 2 • CITY OF TIGARD STRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2025 • 3 'T,--LT- i-. - iii. .1 -: -,. • 1 . ,x f..-ry . r NO ; w fk41411 _ -,. • - • ,:. STRATEGIC •• •• .__ .,, ,.,, • $ ,� - PRIORITIES . - yV .. I II *_ ,r ` . ...„, a + ,Ir . - , J. . .. . „.„ These are the three priorities ff- that support our vision: fiat. The city identified three strategic priorities to help carry out the vision. - _ Within each strategic priority are N.- _ • - -, 4, , 1 objectives, actions, and timeframe -` Set the standard for for completion. Timeframes follow 11 t ., i'i `i' excellence in public service the city's Fiscal Year(FY) which goes fif °� rt and customer experience. ,� .;, --- from July 1 —June 30. Tied to the I ..'? • w objectives are metrics that indicate .i-.•• ' -- and track achievement of the ' ��`� ]1 actions and overall objective. ... .. Create a well-connected, - attractive, and accessible pedestrian network. r.---ifir . A . -, /. .. _._.. . . ,,_,,,.. � w,, 3 - .! . -,,. ir:, kit.: ......_:., _ ,. .- , _,..„ „,,,-, _,� .'":-.1...,1,14,-- � ; Ensure development and : . • • -• growth support the vision. • = . _- 1 - I 1 , _ ...ii. . +``: _....._. . _, = - STRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2025 ■ 5 " 3 ` IP! STRATEGIC STRATEGIC PRIORITY 1 PRIORITYONE Set the standard for excellence in public service and customer experience. Set the standard for excellence in public service and customer experience. METRICS: • % of department work plans and OBJECTIVE: performance audit measures completed. Be a high performing workplace with seamless ► CM/Leadership Team (LT) service delivery. • % of new employee retention at the 1, 3, and 5-year anniversary of hire. ACTIONS LEAD/TIMELINE: ► CM/HR A. Attract, retain and reward a talented workforce. City Management (CM)/Citywide • Employee demographics compared Ongoing to census. ► CM/HR of department work plans and B. Hire a workforce to reflect the racial and ethnic CM/Citywide/Leadership Team (LT) performance audit demographics of the community. Ongoing • # of equity/inclusion related training measures completed. (conferences, workshops, etc.) attended by city staff. C. Promote a values-driven organizational culture that CM/Citywide/LT ► CM/HR reinforces inclusion and ethical behavior, exercises Ongoing transparency and maintains the public trust. • % of recruitments completed within established hiring target timeline. D. Build infrastructure (i.e. resources, equipment, CM/Central Services/Communications/ ► CM/HR space, technology, training) that supports Finance & Information Services (FIS) positive customer interactions. Ongoing E. Create processes and coordinate communica- CM/Central Services/LT tion to ensure consistent customer experience Ongoing across service areas. / • �� •I A I I lot 01A #011' ir•140 I �1 di �1 g1 . 1 .1 �1 . 1 i1 �� . �1 6 • CITY OF TIGARD STRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2025 • 7 STRATEGIC PRIORITY 1 STRATEGIC PRIORITY 1 Set the standard for excellence in public service and customer experience. Set the standard for excellence in public service and customer experience. ElOBC EmbraceJETIVE:data-informed decision-making to solve problems, Offer exemplary customer experience. pursue opportunities for improvement and develop innovative solutions for equitable outcomes. ACTIONS LEAD/TIMELINE: ACTIONS LEAD/TIMELINE: A. Routinely collect and report relevant data. Citywide A. Expand and integrate organizational knowledge about Citywide )ngoing equity and inclusion into customer service. Ongoing B. Implement innovative data collection and tracking strategies. Citywide/FIS/CM B. Provide information and communication methods in Communications )ngoing various formats that are accessible and easy to Ongoing understand for every customer. C. Apply an equity lens to evaluate proposed solutions. Citywide Ongoing C. Resolve customer concerns in a timely, effective, efficient Citywide/CM and consistent manner. FY22 04 D. Establish and refine how to present measures. Citywide FY22 04 E. Identify the suite of reporting tools. FIS, CM, Citywide METRICS: .agoing �`'- • % of total staff completing equityIn focused customer service training. fl ► HR 1 METRICS: • # of products that are provided in T more than one language. , x i ► Communications it''' -A. • % of staff stating they use V ° �� data-informed decision- ` ■ _ , making. ~ City employee response time to n 4; _ public inquiries. ► CM ► CM I h4 i( ? _ • % of total measuresfill • % of community rating overall city implemented. i services as good or better. ► CM ► CM 8 • CITY OF TIGARD STRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2025 • 9 STRATEGIC PRIORITY 1 STRATEGIC PRIORITY 1 Set the standard for excellence in public service and customer experience. Set the standard for excellence in public service and customer experience. iC OBJECTIVE: - . - it V 1 4 Enhance community awareness and engagement with "'°""�""`°` r .` • :,l Of City activities and services. , I..r - _ i;;'� . .:,4 s _. - .ispov-40 , — 4 i ,. - 01 .• S • r 4 I. ' r. ACTIONS LEAD/TIMELINE: ra" iii ..± _'' _ 1 - . , ,T 1- A. Intentionally create an environment that fosters Leadership Team/Library/ r, participation from all members of our community. Communications i J - = , v • ; + '°' . ii, - ' Ongoing k : I B. Consistently collect customer feedback in a way that CM/Communications/ �. Is inclusive to all. PD/CD _ 7lirl � OV ....„ rtt . _ . . ,.. Ongoing � 1. .,_ 0, C. Build authentic relationships and partnerships through Citywide ' city initiatives. Ongoing -- . it '. / '-',-,•::'..--,. . -ii.•':ap--'''- D. Provide news and information that is accurate, timely, Communications/Library/ y. authentic and professionally presented. PD/Citywide ::::..-i:.:1":".71i_:11:::Li'S7 '� " i: Ongoing ' .,gfill/IP! 1 D r;. _ a 1 METRICS: :. . li Au" 40 ■ # of outreach and engagement ,.., opportunities.414rA 0O I II 0 ► Communications i - *' .• . lit;:. I r N • # of people followingCitysocial. . p p # media accounts. IL �� Communications 7 14111- ■ % of social media followers whose ' . .4 iiiiiii primary language is not English. • 4r, L L � .nom. it ► Communications 10 • CITY OF TIGARD STRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2025 • 11 STRATEGIC STRATEGIC PRIORITY 2 PRIORITYTWO Create a well-connected, attractive, and accessible pedestrian network. Create a well-connected, attractive, and accessible Ni T 44 pedestrian network. OBJECTIVE: 71- - t` a EDE Create swell-connected pedestrian network that links all - Tlgard residents and businesses. " - /0 of community ; k '. f within a �' �` 10-minute walk of a 1 le _ . y ` ' -- developed park. ACTIONS LEAD/TIMELINE: = = " A. Inventory existing pedestrian network. Community Development (CD) = f FY21 Q3 - —.�_�- - - #` B. Develop a future-state pedestrian network plan (PNP). CD METRICS: FY21 Q4A\';A , ., or .-µ. - ; ',,;. :• C. Identify and pursue new funding sources to build the CD/Parks • % of residents that use the -.-..-:' '''-'7, , _ !; edestrian network. FY22 Q1 pedestrian network. y`- r' '•1;t • "" ; , p ► CD, Tigard Transportation '` ".` -, kJ-:',.---i: - ii '' _ ' Advisory Committee (TTAC) . :"� ' ,. n D. Bring parks and trailheads within a 10-minute walk of Parks I :r `' .,p, ,r'. •'51x7"4-+d every Tigard resident. FY21 Q4 ;;, • # and location of publicly E accessible spaces, including , . ' k, i� privately owned/publicly accessible [.. E. Expand the pedestrian network annually. Public Works (PW) p Y p y j E' - Ongoing spaces like trails, paths, and plazas. - ■ ' „ ► CD/PW/ITi t44 R . r .' • % of community within a 10-minute : r walk of a developed park. = ' klkillilite ► CD/IT ` ■ % expansion of pedestrian network `' `f annually. ► PW/CD/TTAC 12 • CITY OF TIGARD -P' P . ® .e. VSTRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2025 ■ 13 STRATEGIC PRIORITY 2 STRATEGIC PRIORITY 2 Create a well-connected, attractive, and accessible pedestrian network. Create a well-connected, attractive, and accessible pedestrian network. LIEF OBJECTIVE: Tigard's pedestrian network is attractive, accessible, safe, METRICS: and well maintained. • % of trails with trail markers and wayfinding signage. ► PW ACTIONS LEAD/TIMELINE: • % of pedestrian network and /0 gathering spaces that meet A. Develop and adopt pedestrian network design guidelines that CD/PW of ADA Transition ensure the quality and desirability of the network. rY21 Q3 maintenance service standards. Plan work achieved ► PW annually under current funding allocations. B. Design the trail system to serve both recreational and active CD/Parks transportation purposes. FY21 04 • % of the ADA Transition Plan work achieved annually under current funding allocations. C. Design pedestrian facilities to prevent crime in new or Police (PD)/CD/PW ► PW remodeled sites. Ongoing D. Coordinate seasonal, visible patrol in parks and trails for safety. Parks Ongoing • - — di `' ° • . �.i� . jI,', o A 2,. E. Invest in infrastructure that increases public safety such as Engineering/Parks ,r +�. � trail lighting. Ongoing ,._, .� Fanny Creek Trail ,I??.: F. Ensure inclusive and accessible design is included in the design Engineering/ '� i- .= •;�� guidelines and implemented through the ADA Transition Plan, Central Services ' . :_ \ Parks Master Plan, and Pedestrian Network Plan. Ongoing : . • . . Y �. 'r G. Allocate adequate resources to ensure existing pedestrian CD/Finance/Parks/ r ' ' infrastructure and community gathering spaces are well Streets — - k p t., maintained. Ongoing �� ` ` µ ix. 1111.5›.' i . , - -„ 6%1 (' F4 ,......_ip--....... H. Conduct an annual health and wellness survey. CD -- �. TwiE { Ongoing I air '1• 14 • CITY OF TIGARD STRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2025 • 15 STRATEGIC STRATEGIC PRIORITY 3 PRIORITYTHREE Ensure development and growth support the vision. Ensure development and growth support the vision. METRICS: I 111 OBJECTIVE: • Pursue land development that maximizes public health % of residents living within walking • % of collector and arterial streets distance of essential services. with bike facilities/sidewalks. benefits while increasing connection between people ► Finance & Information Services ► Engineering (FIS)/Engineering/CD and community destinations. • # of employers and employees • # of residents served within one served by high-frequency transit or ACTIONS LEAD/TIMELINE: quarter of a mile of new and light rail, multimodal network. existing businesses. ► CD A. Build a resilient local economy in which residents' health CD ► FIS and the health of local businesses increase together. Ongoing • % of workers/residents within • % of new development in the city's walking distance of a trail or park at B. Locate and grow businesses to support walkability, CD/Parks plan districts that is considered their place of work. connectivity, and accessibility for all business Ongoing mixed-use. ► GIS/Parks/CD location decisions. ► CD • % of Tigard neighborhoods that are C. Build mixed-use development that is inclusive of CD/Engineering • % of streets that meet Complete "20-minute" neighborhoods. housing, shopping, employment, services and integrates Ongoing Streets criteria. transportation options. ► CD/Engineering ► CD D. Fully implement the City's Complete Streets policy. CD/Engineering Ongoing E. Ensure all businesses can easily connect to resources that CD help them grow and add value to the community. Ongoing O C-4) :-. 6 F. Capitalize on Tigard's business mix, central location and CD O access to the region's talent to support a healthy economy Ongoing that provides employment opportunities for residents. C I\/I P L E T E of streets that meet S TR EETS Complete Streets G. Invest in public spaces that equitably serve the city's CD/Parks criteria diverse residents, workers, and visitors. Ongoing TIGARD 16 • CITY OF TIGARD STRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2025 • 17 STRATEGIC PRIORITY 3 STRATEGIC PRIORITY 3 Ensure development and growth support the vision. Ensure development and growth support the vision. OBJECTIVE: Focus development-associated resources in parts of the :`.� city that have the capacity to serve, house, employ, and , attract the most people with the least impact on Tigard's , tgri: ':' ----74-.'A 1 natural systems and the climate. r� --A4 .5• F:. �! ! •;, r° ':i."-na..r ACTIONS LEAD/TIMELINE: fij *- 1 %z',..-4"..2'.: 4_ -, • ':+p.'• it „,,..4s.4„,, rte `'�Ir!` .�LfS �••; •: $ '4. ` A. Blend land uses to support a range of commercial and CD '=, ":11.;.,-„ N,'4.;.,,,:•.4,,,` ` ', ''Y......, : 1'• employment opportunities within and in proximity to Ongoing " 4. ..'• "p 4. ; ::c , r p. residential neighborhoods. " _ g r - % i � _ - 1 B. Facilitate Transit Oriented Development (TOD) that supports CD/Engineering - ....1...z..:;.,,,,,,,,,: + - - employment, housing, and community services. Ongoing - x, : . : lii it \ �. r ,!` , 11111 . C. Incorporate greenhouse gas impact and multimodal CD/Engineering ,. 4 opportunity into evaluation criteria for capital improvement FY21 Q3 /"; ' , project prioritizations. METRICS: D. Ensure capital improvement program (CIP) funding reflects CD/Engineering the prioritization of this objective. FY22 01 • Land use blend factor. • % of stream mileage rated as ► CD/GIS "high- or medium-quality". ► CD E. Incorporate sustainable and low-impact building and site CD planning technologies into city codes and standards. FY22 03 • Residential, employment, and commercial density within one-third • % of publicly-funded capital projects of a mile of all light rail stations. meet city requirements for pedestrian/ F. Protect and restore the ecological functions of and maximize CD/Engineering ► CD bicycle/transit infrastructure. the ecosystem services of streams, wetlands, and associated Ongoing ► CD riparian corridors. • % of new construction meeting sustainability criteria. ► CD 18 • CITY OF TIGARD STRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2025 • 19 STRATEGIC PRIORITY 3 STRATEGIC PRIORITY 3 Ensure development and growth support the vision. Ensure development and growth support the vision. OBJECTIVE:Eli � C5f ' 1 Understand the effects of development on vulnerable Tigard residents and mitigate these impacts within �XC ,A projects and over time. �,� �. ' y ..-:--i: - , 'II. , -ii 1 ACTIONS LEAD/TIMELINE: • ;i% 11r 4 • A. Increase access and participation of communitymembers who Citywide M 1 - J E:figaishis.„.., p p Y�^/ � "� ) 1 Illw 4are historically underrepresented in city processes and committees. OngoingfTQC iB. Mitigate displacement of low-income communities in projects CD ,� `I *receiving city investment. Ongoing dC. Support a balanced, diverse mix of business sectors and CDS Y r _Oa IA =employment opportunities. Ongoing -�- e.. . y ' a • D. Ensure transportation investments and improvements are CD/Engineeringproviding equitable benefits & impacts to the entire population. Ongoing , ORIF .,—i ,r--:, .4461 '' ,i0— . - E. Advance equitable economic opportunity. CDa k-. Ongoing 4 1 liar ._ F. Increase the weight equity holds when making capital improvement CD/Engineering METRICS: and transportation project prioritizations. Ongoing • % of new businesses owned by people of color h,,‘ a► :, I �' - reflects the percentage in the total population. * f Ti 7 ,i 1 ► FIS . � ,. Advance iw }„ ` J �`: 1 u,,: • % of CIP budget spent in CDBG-qualifying equitable e "". -• 1; �' 4 census tracts. economic I F _1 1 ► GIS/Engineering opportunity. rriA,' milig �4 - �~ ^rii • # of residents displaced by city projects. - � � ,, ,,,„,ai is, ► Citywide r: ialLlt: fr mit �'',.' � 20 • CITY OF TIGARD STRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2025 • 21 STRATEGIC PRIORITY 3 STRATEGIC PRIORITY 3 Ensure development and growth support the vision. Ensure development and growth support the vision. OBJECTIVE: Proactively intervene as necessary to meet the housing 3 •4 _ - needs of all community members. _ -- f ACTIONS LEAD/TIMELINE: i ...- , -' J . 1.;il 0{ -...- . . . 0 A. Prioritize funds to support the creation and retention of CD r , _ -- '� affordable housing in Downtown Tigard, the Tigard Triangle Ongoing xi and Washington Square. - ° • {: _ ___-_-- -----_----:----- 1 .....-----"I''''... a ' .44 ,. ., B. Reduce the number of unhoused Tigard residents without CD ., 'l'-- _ _ displacing them from the city. Ongoing • __-r4 L, . ,.. ___ _ _ ± ; i , . . :, : ... ...., . ..„ . 1 C. Provide opportunities for transition into permanent housing CD �— ref 1 : L '!� ' through innovative approaches to safe temporary dwellings. Ongoing '� ��r° �: �` ----I iiif LH � Iiiilifiiii.ii E! ��! E Khi01t y 4Pp;KING EMANCE . 110 `. D. Increase the housing mix in the city to meet the needs of smaller CD ' households, including singles, young families, and older adults. Ongoing METRICS: 1 '. or E. Survey housing needs in the city and match needs to be CD • # of affordable units in the city's • % of households of color who own strategic, measured by median family income. Ongoing plan districts. reflects the % in the total population. ► CD ► CD F. Support higher homeownership rates among communities CD of color and historically marginalized communities to build Ongoing intergenerational wealth. • # of unhoused residents. • # of permanently affordable ► Citywide/Communications ownership units created through G. Continue participation in regional affordable housing CD down payment assistance. workgroups. Ongoing • # and % of Metro bond projects in ► CD Tigard. ► CD 44111 °1010 !riot% Fr • Mix factor of housing units by type ni 1 and square footage. ► CD 22 • CITY OF TIGARD STRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2025 • 23 STRATEGIC PRIORITY 3 STRATEGIC PRIORITY 3 Ensure development and growth supports the vision. Ensure development and growth supports the vision. 111 OBJECTIVE: Plan and create in a manner that reduces climate impacts Ensure TSP to the maximum extent practicable, especially for those supports the most vulnerable. reduction of vehicle miles traveled and ACTIONS LEAD/TIMELINE: greenhouse gas emissions. A. Reduce the burden of climate change on low-income CD populations and communities of color. Ongoing . 4 #r , i B. Preserve and expand the city's existing urban tree canopy. CD/PW/Parks/StreetsEr i Ongoing Al111 1111 Y J C. Take steps to prepare the city's landscapes and public spaces PW/CD/Central Services for changing climate. FY22 01 • met ID. Ensure Transportation System Plan (TSP) supports the reduction CD METRICS: of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and greenhouse gas emissions. FY22 02 • % greenhouse gas emission • Average # of daily vehicle miles E. Evaluate development projects for their contribution to VMT CD reductions in city operations traveled for Tigard households. reduction, compact development form, and sustainable use Ongoing ► FIS/Central Services/PW ► CD of resources. • % of tree canopy coverage within • % of development in urban reserves F. Require new development to demonstrate reduced or Engineering limited VMT through a Transportation Impact Analysis and Ongoing the city. that is supportive of public transit, appropriate transportation demand management tools. ► CD/PW/Parks/GIS neighborhood commerce, and walkability. G. Updated transportation mode share targets. CD • % of tree canopy estimated as 30 ► CD FY22 02 years or older. A lis ► CD/PW/Parks/GIS • % change in density by census tract. AWit. v.* ► GIS ■ % ofp ublic spaces that have climate t 111111 p ready landscapes. • Tigard fuel tax increase by x%/yr in ► PW/Parks line with GHG-reduction strategy %. ► CD/FIS 24 • CITY OF TIGARD -. . . I STRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2025 • 25 �~:, y `, f-. `�; _ y - -. .. GLOSSARY • trie:�• - - PP r� - I • i I1 ci � .r ,� 20-Minute Neighborhoods: Areas where residents Mixed Use: A variety of complementary and rillk �'�' F1 have easy, convenient access to many of the places integrated uses, such as, but not limited to, r ; •- ~�: 1VIIi `` .` and services they use daily including grocery residential, office, manufacturing, retail, public or *. - /"` i, stores, restaurants, schools and parks, without entertainment, in a compact urban form. -^`� -� relying heavilyon a car. ' :*. _ i, y g Parks Master Plan (PMP):A document that guides ( t, ~ + Affordable Housing: Federally defined as housing development of park, recreation, and trails in the city. that costs a household no more than 30% of its 11411 .all � � , gross income for rent and utilities. Sustainable: Using, developing and protecting * lit - s resources at a rate and in a manner that enables �. Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA): A civil rights people to meet their current needs and also lawwith that prohibitsdisabilitiesin discriminationallareasof againstpubliclife,individualsincluding providesownneeds.that futureSustainability generationsrequires cansimultaneously meet their ' �' . ,,, ..i _ `::_ , jobs, schools,transportation, and all public and meeting environmental, economic and community , I private places that are open to the general public. needs. 1- - - Capital Improvement Program (CIP): Tigard's Tigard Triangle: Area of Tigard bounded byPacific : _: • a 6-year plan for matching the cost of large-scale Highway, Interstate 5, and Highway 217. ~. ---- improvements—like fixing roads, water and sewer _ systems—to anticipated revenues, like taxes and Transportation Impact Analysis: An assessment ;'. bonds. to gauge the potential transportation impacts of proposed projects. Climate Ready Landscapes: Designing landscapes in a way that adapts and prepares for climate Transit Oriented Development (TOD): Development change. that creates compact, walkable, pedestrian- oriented, mixed-use communities centered around S U M ivi Community Development Block Grant(CDBG): high-quality train systems. A federal program that provides annual grants on a formula basis to states, cities, and counties to Transportation Mode Share: The percentage of develop viable urban communities by providing travelers using a particular type of transportation or decent housing and a suitable living environment, number of trips using said type. The purose of the strategic plan is to provide guidance and direction for the city's and by expanding economic opportunities, Transportation System Plan (TSP): Sets the policy priorities for the next five years, through the end of 2025. Our vision highlights where principally for low- and moderate-income persons. framework for the city's transportation system. It we want to go and what we want to be, while our strategic priorities point to how we Complete Streets: A transportation policy and includes a list of strategies and projects that will are going to achieve our vision. design approach that requires streets to be guide future investments. The strategies range from planned, designed, operated, and maintained to access management,to connectivity improvements, Proactively planning provides an opportunity to grow the city in a way that is enable safe, convenient and comfortable travel and to "smarter" traffic signals. There are more than thoughtful and unique. This plan accomplishes this by leveraging and building on access for users of all ages and abilities regardless 140 identified transportation projects ranging from Tigard's existing strengths and aiming to continue to grow Tigard as a thriving, of their mode of transportation. sidewalk infill to freeway over-passes. desirable place to live, work and play. This strategic plan also informs the allocation of Downtown Urban Renewal District: An area Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT): A measurement limited city resources to both long- and short-term goals. encompassing Downtown Tigard and defined in the that tracks the amount of travel for all vehicles in City Center Urban Renewal Plan. a geographic region over a given period, typically To stay informed on the progress of the strategic plan, visit one-year. It is calculated as the sum of the number Greenhouse Gas (GHG): A gas that absorbs and of miles traveled by each vehicle. www.tigard-or.gov/strategicplan emits radiant energy within the thermal infrared range. Metro: The regional government of the Portland metropolitan area. 26 • CITY OF TIGARD STRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2025 • 27 APPENDIX Additional city plans are referenced in the strategic plan that will more specifically address some of the actions identified. See below to learn more about each plan. Name Referenced Link to Plan www.tigard-orgov/document_center/ Transportation System Plan Strategic Priority 2 CommunityDevelopment/tsp.pdf www.tigard-orgov/document_center/ Parks Master Plan Strategic Priority 2 Parks/park_master_pla n.pdf Engineering Design and www.tigard-or.gov/engineering/Public_ Strategic Priority 2 Construction Standard Improvement_Design_Standards.pdf www.tigard-orgov/ADA/ ADA Transition Plan Strategic Priority 2 ADA-Self-Evaluation-TransitionPlan.pdf 28 ■ CITY OF TIGARD STRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2025 ■ 29 CITY OF TIGARD STRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2025 ,, } :, ."/....• } t ‘ • 1 1 • 1 • • 4e's►s--..rte .�} - .-4 k. r `' _ { '. ice-Jx .._ .. ' iiiiiii... rte' i • 1 a_ " _ elit k. . a fr-, •tF • ,_ 1'i 5'i,.'_ ! .•'may' _ ` ( �l`s._y .... •. ..[fes • .• Y 2 _ . • • may:.,' -t. -.......-.-‘%.- tes a , - ..• --_ • ...+' , `�. _ ..•--i '>tiQ.- '... am.��: :.'',...k..• • - '.---.T...‘. ;P'''.-:-1.'.,.., •.5-; .... .-:..... -...--..W..IV•- :%. •-•; V.; .... ., r�"•��-+d041'' ''''-. + ti R1 .. _ r,.'� - sly' • -,:r.. i� . • • + '•'' CITY OF TIGARD Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done Er Strategic Plan Refresh Public Input & Final Plan Tigard City Council September 22, 2020 CITY OF TIGARD Purpose Receive an overview of public input on the refreshed vision and strategic priorities and adopt the final refreshed strategic plan. Public Input Approach ❖ Stakeholder interviews — internal and .. HOW DO YOU ENVISION TIGARD'S FUTURE? v IIGA tty'n ❑ Our treRon an sets the direction of our corm mu niry priaritlesfar the nectflueto ext e r n a l - ,warty years.Our vision highlights where we went to go and(Li hattue wont to be while our priorities pornt to how We ore going to ochleue ourniriOn.Our plan refresh robes on input from you.Think rthepd to the neat flue to twenty yeors.What will Tigard be? ❖ Current state data analysis Our Proposed Vision Tigard:an equitable community that is walkable. •'• Surveys healthy.and accessible tar everyone. Cityol Tigard Our Proposed Priorities •'• Newsletters: Cityscape, Books & Bits STRATEGIC •Create an attractive and welt•tanneHcd • pedestrian network. M Ensure development and growth supports e vision ❖ Media: Tigard Life, Facebook & social 'customer for excellence In public service and platforms, Engage Tigard. Share your thoughts and team more at .�. www,engage.tigard-or,gowstrategic-plan Paper: Bookmarks, posters in parks, door hangers in neighborhoods and apartments ❖ Collaboration: Chamber of Commerce, DHM poll, boards & committees ❖ Staff connection: internal newsletter, all-staff presentation CITY OF TIGARD Validation — Results & Response A total of 175 survey responses received (76 from community members, 99 from staff and committee & board members). 91% suppor- the vision. 92% support the strategic priorities. that the vision accurately reflects community values. In7 137 comments were provided (through surveys and social media). 88% agree that the values of "equitable, walkable, healthy, and accessible" are important to the Tigard community (DHM preliminary results). How We Adjusted e ) • Reordered strategic priorities • Modify language in each strategic priority • Framed the vision CITY OF TIGARD Our Refreshed Vision Tigard: an equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. Framing the Vision / Equity - Just and fair inclusion into a society in which all can participate, prosper, and reach their full potential. ' Walkability - A walkable environment supports and allows for a choice to participate in active forms of transportation such as cycling and includes people traveling with or without a mobility aid. A walkable community is foundational to an equitable and sustainable community. 2 / Accessibility - Providing equivalent ease of use and opportunity for all people to interact with our services, processes, and infrastructure. Created by Krisada Healthy - Supporting the community's physical, economic, from Noun Project and environmental well-being which improves all aspects 1 Definition by PolicyLink of health. 2 Inspired by America Walks definition CITY OF TIGARD SP1: Set the standard for excellence in aSS public service and customer experience. ICIliwt? 1. Community Input Created by Adrian Coquet from Noun Project Center equity and customer experience as concepts 2. Example Actions Intentional inclusion; refine how data is collected and used; promote values-driven workplace culture 3. Example Metrics Measure turnover and retention, response time, and implementation of data-informed decision making Tigard: An equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. CITY OF TIGARD SP2: Create a well-connected, attractive, and accessible pedestrian network. 1. Community Input "Walkability" contributes to an equitable community; focus on connectivity and accessibility of public realm 2. Example Actions o Create a pedestrian network that is well-connected, attractive, and accessible; identify new funding to build Ci the network 3. Example Metrics 0-1 Track the use, expansion and connectivity of the network Tigard: An equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. CITY OF TIGARD SP3: Ensure development and growth support the vision. 1. Community Input Access, Congestion and Community Identity 2. Example Actions Blend land uses, support affordable housing and a range of housing options, mitigate climate change impacts 3. Example Metrics Measure residential, employment, and commercial density Claaled by IconMark f/OT Noun Project Tigard: An equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. CITY OF TIGARD Looking Ahead City of Tigard / Implementation STRATEGIC PLAN 2020-2025 Alignment across city ,.rte--lerP►' ;. initiatives ""' \ "'' ' v: -6 Coordinate actions & 11, .' BARD err 1I� .. •.-iCalllk•u measures -, 1 l -A,' Identify & pursue funding �, r Provide progress updates riskt ' * ":1(-404 � to the public is Continue sharing our vision � ' - - y � •1S .S • 0 ' Nver,A & priorities 7 1 TIGARD sol_ CITY OF TIGARD Questions & Comments Action Request: Adopt the final refreshed strategic plan. AIS-4413 8. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 09/22/2020 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Consider a Contract Award for Administrative Related Software Solutions & Technology Services to Tyler Technologies Prepared For: Christine Moody Submitted By: Christine Moody, Finance and Information Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Local Contract Review Board Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall the Local Contract Review Board award a contract to Tyler Technologies for Administrative Related Software Solutions & Technology Services in the amount of $6,400,000.00 for implementation services and a 10-year Software as a Service (SaaS) contract term? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award the purchase and implementation services of Munis, EnerGov, Document Management, Enterprise Asset Management, Court 311, Socrata, Meeting Manager, and other optional SaaS software functionality from Tyler Technologies under the Sourcewell Cooperative Contract. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The City's departments currently utilize aged, best of breed enterprise systems that are over a decade old. Many of these systems have either relied on software customizations that restricted the ability to upgrade and create further enhancements to support city operations, or require expensive vendor supported changes for enhancements and modifications. In addition, these siloed systems do not have the ability to properly report and analyze data across platforms making data informed decisions nearly impossible with a high likelihood of inconsistent and improper data. Many recent initiatives including the Performance Audit and the IT Strategic plan have identified the need to replace all currently used enterprise systems with modern technologies that allow for standardized efficient workflows, data sharing and reporting, heightened system security, with enhanced services and transparency to the people who live, work, and visit Tigard. This project aligns the City's need for integrating information, strategic priorities, City Council goals, and performance audit measures. This citywide, unified system will allow the City to: •Use informed data for reporting and new initiatives • Combine systems and reduce integration issues •Have better data quality and consistency across enterprise systems •Provide cross-departmental workload efficiencies •Modernize its enterprise system •Utilize LEAN/process efficiency improvements •Implement solutions that help with performance audit recommendations •Tell its story to the community The magnitude of this project will make this the largest technological undertaking for the city so far, and it will be one of the highest priorities for Tigard departments. The Information Technology IT division will lead the project and is developing a project implementation team that includes IT resources and department designated subject matter experts to join the team and help design and implement the system over the next 3-5 years. Staff have performed a thorough evaluation over the past few months of system technical requirements and Tyler Technologies emerged as the clear leader for an enterprise-wide system. The City explored multiple options for soliciting an enterprise system and found that Tyler Technologies holds a national cooperative contract through Sourcewell, a governmental service cooperative in which the City is a member. As such, the City is eligible to make an Interstate Cooperative Procurement per Tigard Public Contracting Rule 10.085. This allows the City to obtain best pricing and utilize an existing contract, saving both time and money. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The Local Contract Review Board may choose to not enter into this contract and direct staff to issue a Request for Proposals. This would delay the start of this project and most likely will end up with less favorable pricing. COUNCIL OR TCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS City Council Goal 1: Ensure the City's continued financial stability and sustainability while providing mandated services. Performance Audit Recommendations IT Strategic Plan Priority 1: Integration of Disparate Data Source for Enhancement of Data-Informed Business Decisions. DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION N/A Fiscal Impact Cost: $6.4M Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where Budgeted (department/program): Information Technology Division Additional Fiscal Notes: The $6.4 M contract is the cost over the next 10 years. It includes implementation, data conversion, project management, and 10 years of SaaS services and will replace aging software that the city will stop paying for as we transition to the Tyler Technologies platform. The one-time implementation costs will be paid by the Central Service Fund reserves that are set aside for this purpose. The ongoing costs represent an increase of approximately $150,000 annually over the current software costs and are anticipated in the city's forecast. Attachments No file(s) attached. MEMORANDUM TIGARD 13 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Mike Nolop, IT Manager RE: Tyler Technology Contract Details DATE: 9/21/2020 Mr. Mayor, and members of the City Council, With an action packed and very full Council meeting on Tuesday, I wanted to give you new information on the Tyler Technologies contract that will be before you at the 9/22 council meeting. This information was not included in the AIS due to continued negotiations on the contract through its finalization late last week. Background: The current software systems are aged, disparate, and do not offer the modern platform technologies that is required to satisfy the aforementioned needs. Data and the way it is used to make decisions is rapidly evolving within our organization and these systems cannot begin to keep up with the pace of change and need Tigard has. For the past nine months City staff has been evaluating Tyler Technologies (Tyler) software options to identify components that would assist with providing solutions to Council Initiatives, Performance Audit recommendations, and individual department specific goals and needs. Tyler software is available to us through a cooperative purchasing agreement, this method of procurement offers the Tigard taxpayers time, resource, and financial savings compared to other channels of procurement. Contract Details: For the past two months a team of IT, Purchasing, and Legal resources have been working with Tyler to finalize an agreement that is mutually beneficial for Tigard taxpayers and for Tyler. We feel this contract will position the City with unified systems that will enhance abilities to move Tigard forward through technology, and the use of data for the next decade and beyond. This contract contains multiple components of Software as a Service (SaaS) and locks those costs for the duration of the 10-year contract term. The software components included are as follows: • Tyler Munis —Financials, HR, Risk, Payroll, Contracts, Purchasing, UB • Tyler EAM—Enterprise Asset Management&Work Orders • Tyler EnerGov—Permitting, Code Compliance, CIP • Tyler Content Manager—Electronic document retention • Tyler 311 / Constituent Management—*New citywide program • Executime Advanced Scheduling—*New citywide program • Tyler Socrata—New *public facing information sharing and reporting system • Tyler Incode Court—Municipal Court / Virtual Court platform This contract also includes the ability for Tigard to add on optional services within the first 36 months of the agreement if we determine the technologies are beneficial to departmental and citywide needs. These services are not included in the contract price before you and would require a contract amendment if we determine there is a need to add. These potential services are as follows: • E-Ticketing—traffic and parking violation software • Enterprise Content Manager— Enhanced document management services for permanent digital records • Meeting and Agenda Management software—Public meeting management software with unified calendar components. This project will be the largest technology project Tigard has ever taken on. Many resources will be needed across all Tigard departments to ensure success of the implementation of the selected systems. IT resources have been built into the budget for the current fiscal year and as of note, four of the 5 position have been filled. The final position has an open recruitment process and will be filled by the end of October. This contract covers the software and implementation costs for Tyler resources, IT resources were included in the budgeting process. Future budget cycles will most likely see backfill limited duration additions to the city departments which will allow seasoned long- term employees to join our Total Tyler team as subject matter experts (SME) to implement the solutions. This methodology ensures those with the most SME's are available to implement the new technologies, lead the changes this project will bring, and remain post- implementation as expert users of the systems and processes they championed. Backfill / limited duration positions will be needed within departments to ensure continued operations at proper resource levels during the project so that the SME's can focus primarily on the new system implementation. Cost: There are three different costs incorporated within this contract. 1) Software as a Service (SaaS) —also known as licensing. The Tyler solution will be hosted by Tyler Technologies in their private cloud infrastructure. SaaS Fees in this contract are as follows. a. FY21 - $167,000 b. FY22 - $357,000 c. FY23 - $473,000 d. FY24 - $499,000 e. FY 25 - $499,000 f. FY26—FY 30 - $514,000 2) Data Conversion—costs associated with converting data from our current enterprise systems which will be available for use in the new Tyler systems will total $175,000 over the four years of the planned implementation. 3) Implementation— costs are billed "as used" on a quarterly basis during the 4-year implementation. Current projections of implementation costs are as follows: a. FY21 - $300,000 b. FY22 - $400,000 c. FY23 - $600,000 d. FY24 - $250,000 e. FY25 —$100,000 The ask: That the LCRB approves the contract with Tyler Technologies. Thank you for your consideration on the contract with Tyler Technologies. This is a lot of information and pages upon pages of details could be written. I am more than happy to answer any questions you may have and look forward to keeping you up to date you as we proceed through the phases of this large project over the next 4-years. Tyler Technologies Solutions • Tyler Munis — Financials, HR, Risk, Payroll, Contracts, Purchasing, UB • Tyler EAM — Enterprise Asset Management & Work Orders • Tyler EnerGov — Permitting, Code Compliance, CIP • Tyler Document Management — Electronic document retention • Tyler 311 / Constituent Management — * New citywide program • Executime Advanced Scheduling — * New citywide program • Tyler Socrata — New *public facing information sharing/ reporting system • Tyler Incode Court — Municipal Court / Virtual Court platform " e r T1GARD Tyler Technologies Contract Recommendation • $6.4M contract total ➢ $4.8M 10-years of Software as a Service services ➢ $1.6M of Implementation and Data Conversion services II a " TIGARD Questions? TIGARD History • Aging disparate enterprise systems not meeting the needs of current initiatives. • Performance Audit & IT Strategic Plan recommendation support the Total Tyler project concept. " e r T1GARD Large scale citywide project / 4-year implementation • Software as a Service, implementation, and data conversion • IT staffing resources • Departmental staffing resources Resource allocation and commitment is the key to success ! " e r T1GARD AIS-4411 9. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 09/22/2020 Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes Agenda Title: Consider a Resolution Extending the City's Emergency Declaration Related to COVID-19 Prepared For: Shelby Rihala, City Management Submitted By: Caroline Patton, Central Services Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall Council extend the City's emergency declaration related to COVID-19? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends approval of the resolution extending the City's emergency declaration. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY This request is for a fifth extension of the City of Tigard's emergency declaration related to COVID-19, this time extending the declaration of emergency until 12pm on December 2 2020. The declaration is necessary to continue to respond to the emergency, including requests for outside assistance and flexibility surrounding City policies. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could let the existing declaration expire at the end of September or extend for a different length of time. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION •March 17, 2020: Council ratifies Mayor's emergency declaration. •April 21, 2020: Council approves first extension to the emergency declaration. •May 26, 2020: Council approves second extension to the emergency declaration. •June 23, 2020: Council approves third extension to the emergency declaration. •July 28, 2020: Council approves fourth extension to the emergency declaration. Attachments Resolution CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD EXTENDING THE CITY'S EMERGENCY RELATED TO COVID-19 WHEREAS,Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 7.74,the City's Emergency Management Code, as well as ORS 401.305, authorize the City to establish an emergency management agency, including the authority to establish policies and protocols for defining and directing responsibilities during a time of emergency;and WHEREAS, pursuant to TMC 7.74.040, a local emergency exists whenever the City or an area impacting part of the City is suffering, or in imminent danger of suffering, an incident that may cause injury or death to persons,including a disease or pandemic; and WHEREAS, TMC 7.74 and ORS 401.309 authorize certain actions to be taken during a state of emergency when necessary for public safety or for the efficient conduct of activities to minimize or mitigate the effects of the emergency;and WHEREAS, the Governor has declared a state of emergency for the State of Oregon and the Washington County Board of Commissioners has declared a state of emergency for Washington County;and WHEREAS,this declaration is in support of the COVID-19 public health response;and WHEREAS,pursuant to TMC 7.74.070, the Tigard City Council ratified the Mayor's emergency declaration on March 17, 2020;and WHEREAS, TMC 7.74.070.E says that the declaration must limit the duration of the state of emergency to the period of time during which the conditions giving rise to the declaration exist or are likely to remain in existence; and WHEREAS, on April 21, 2020, the Tigard City Council extended the duration of the City's emergency declaration to May 31,2020;and WHEREAS, on May 26, 2020, the Tigard City Council extended the duration of the City's emergency declaration to June 30, 2020; and WHEREAS, on June 23, 2020, the Tigard City Council extended the duration of the City's emergency declaration to July 31, 2020; and WHEREAS, on July 28, 2020, the Tigard City Council extended the duration of the City's emergency declaration to September 30,2020; and WHEREAS, Council finds it necessary to extend the emergency declaration in order to continue its response efforts. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: RESOLUTION NO.20- Page 1 SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council declares the response to COVID-19 constitutes a continuing state of emergency. SECTION 2: The local emergency exists within the territorial limits of the City of Tigard. SECTION 3: COVID-19 constitutes an urgent threat to public health, requiring additional resources and protective measures to protect the health of City staff, family members, and the Tigard community. SECTION 4: A local emergency authorizes City officials to take the following measures: A. The City and its officials are authorized to take such actions and issue such orders as described in Tigard Municipal Code 7.74 as are determined necessary to protect lives and property and to efficiently conduct activities that minimize or mitigate the effect of the emergency. B. The emergency procurement of goods and services is authorized pursuant to the Oregon Public Contracting Code, Tigard Municipal Code 2.46, and the City of Tigard Local Contract Review Board Public Contracting Rules. C. To protect the health of City employees, the City may issue emergency rules or guidance on the use of sick leave, telework, remote work, or other policies that will be in effect only for the duration of the emergency. D. To respond to the emergency, and to particularly ease burdens on businesses and service sector workers, the City may relax or adjust enforcement of City codes, including but not limited to parking restrictions downtown. E. To continue to manage and receive necessary supplies and assistance,including but not limited to personal protective equipment, the City has activated its Emergency Operations Center and centralized logistics. The City may request additional assistance as needed, including through mutual assistance agreements, the Cooperative Public Agencies of Washington County (CPAWC),Medical Reserve Corps, and the American Red Cross, among others. SECTION 5: This declaration of emergency will remain in effect until 12pm on December 2,2020. SECTION 6: This resolution repeals and replaces Resolution 20-41 and is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2020. Mayor-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO.20- Page 2 ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO.20- Page 3 AIS-4417 10. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 09/22/2020 Length (in minutes): 20 Minutes Agenda Title: Consider a Resolution to Update the Tigard AID Utility Billing Assistance Program Prepared For: Toby LaFrance Submitted By: Caroline Patton, Central Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Council Resolution Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall Council approve a resolution to update the Tigard AID Utility Billing Assistance Program? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends approval of the resolution as presented. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY On May 12, 2020, Council passed Resolution No. 20-24 that approved a monthly utility credit of up to $40 per month for residential utility customers served by Tigard who were unemployed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The resolution also provided the $40 per month credit to commercial customers impacted by COVID. In May, the Tigard AID Utility Billing Credit program was implemented to provide this credit to both residential and commercial customers from March to December 2020 or until the $750,000 allocated by the City for the program is spent. In total, the Tigard AID Program provides $2.2 million in customer assistance: • $625K for unemployed households • $125K for businesses impacted by COVID • $50K for expanding the program for low income households (through St. Vincent de Paul) • $1.4M for all customers through delayed rate increases from July 1, 2020 to January 1, 2021. More than two months after implementation, the program appears underutilized and the demand has been less than staff anticipated. To increase participation, Utility Billing and Public Works developed a plan to increase outreach efforts to reach more customers through phone calls, billing inserts, door hangers, and Know H2O.Just as these outreach efforts were scheduled to start, Washington County announced their utility billing assistance program, funded by Washington County's allocation of federal CARES Act money. Outreach efforts were placed on hold to ensure up-to-date information on the County's program was communicated to Tigard customers. The County program is administered by Community Action and includes $3 million for utility assistance. The intent of the program is to pay the full amount of utility bills incurred between March 1 and December 30, 2020 for eligible customers. Like the City's program administered by St. Vincent de Paul, customers must meet income thresholds to be eligible. Tigard is in the process of executing a vendor agreement with Community Action. On August 20, the Tigard AID Program webpage was updated to include information on the various types of utility bill assistance available, including the County's CARES utility assistance program, the City's existing Tigard Utility Billing Credit program, and the St. Vincent de Paul water assistance program. Outreach through phone calls, billing inserts, door hangers, and Know H2O is now continuing with information going out to Tigard's utility customers about the three assistance programs offered through Tigard AID. On September 15, staff presented proposed changes to the Tigard AID program to Council. Because of the broad eligibility for the CARES program—including coverage for both underemployed and unemployed customers, along with coverage for the full amount of the utility bill—staff recommended expanding the City's existing program. Recommended program expansion will: • Cover the whole bill for residential customers aligning the City's program with Washington County's CARES program. •Help those who are unemployed or underemployed due to COVID-19, but do not qualify for the County's program due to income thresholds. •Provide increased assistance to commercial customers financially impacted by COVID-19 for up to $500 of the monthly utility bill. •Increase the credit amount for those customers who have already received the credit under the current flat $40 per month to the expanded amount. •Moves the waiver of late fees and shutoff actions from the emergency declaration to the resolution for the Tigard AID program At the September 15 Council meeting, Council agreed with these changes and the attached resolution will put them into effect. In addition, Council gave direction to staff to pursue program expansion that will provide aid to individuals that live in multi-family housing. Staff is pursuing this additional program expansion and will come to Council in October with a resolution for Council consideration. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could elect to not make any changes to the City's existing program or offer additional amendments. COUNCIL OR TCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION • 5/12/2020 - COVID-19 Response and Recommendations • 9/15/2020 - Council Workshop on Tigard AID program expansion Attachments Resolution CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20- A RESOLUTION EXPANDING ELIGIBILITY FOR TIGARD'S PROGRAM TO PROVIDE A MONTHLY UTILITY CREDIT FOR RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS CUSTOMERS AFFECTED BY COVID-19,WAIVING LA'Z'E FEES,AND SUSPENDING SHUTOFFS WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, Tigard City Council passed Resolution No. 20-24, approving a monthly utility credit of up to $40 per month for unemployed residential utility customers and business customers negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic;and WHEREAS, in early August, Washington County authorized $3 million in utility assistance funding as part of Washington County CARES, which was intended to provide payment of full utility bills to unemployed and underemployed residential customers,as well as business customers adversely affected by COVID-19;and WHEREAS, the City wishes to streamline its utility bill assistance programs consistent with the County's CARES program;and WHEREAS, since the beginning of the declared emergency in March, the City has been waiving certain late fees on utility bills and suspending utility shutoffs as part of the City's emergency declaration;and WHEREAS, to give more certainty to the City's utility customers as to the duration of the late fee and shutoff suspension, the City is separating that relief from the emergency declaration and instead setting a date certain. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: Upon verification of unemployment or underemployment associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, as determined by the City of Tigard, the City may credit up to the full amount per month towards a residential customer's Tigard utility account bill. The credit is available to all residential customers served by a Tigard utility,including customers outside the city limits for whom Tigard provides water service. A customer must reapply for the credit each month in order to continue receiving it. SECTION 2: Upon verification that a business has been negatively impacted by COVID-19, such as for a forced closure or curtailment of operations, the City may credit up to $500 per month towards a business customer's Tigard utility account bill. The credit is available to all business customers served by a Tigard utility, including customers outside the city limits for which Tigard provides water service. A customer must reapply for the credit each month in order to continue receiving it. SECTION 3: This utility bill credit program will remain in effect until December 31, 2020 or until the funding that the City has allocated for this program is spent,whichever comes first. The City is allocating $625,000 for the residential credit program and $125,000 for the business credit program. SECTION 4: The City may adopt rules and procedures to implement this utility credit program. RESOLUTION NO.20- Page 1 SECTION 5: The City of Tigard will temporarily waive all late fees and shutoff actions for utility accounts accruing as of March 16,2020 and continuing until January 1,2021. SECTION 6: This resolution repeals and replaces Resolution 20-24 and is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2020. Mayor-City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO.20- Page 2