The URL can be used to link to this page

03/29/1995 - Packet Book TIGARD WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Serving Unincorporated Area REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, March 29, 1995 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Visitor Comments 3. Approval of February 27, 1995 Minutes 4. Resignation and Appointment of Commissioners 5. Information on Policies (emergency and afterhours) - Randy Volk 6. Intergovernmental Water Board Update - Beverly Fronde 7. Update on Water Conservation Proposals 8. Director's Report - Ed Wegner a. Interim Water Plan b. Long Range Supply Plan 9. Non-Agenda Items 10. Commissioner's Comments 11. Set Next Meeting Agenda Reminder: TWD Meeting 4-24-95 7:00 IWB Meeting 4-12-95 @ 5:30 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING February 27, 1995 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Froude, Commissioners Haunsperger, Mortensen, and Pedersen STAFF PRESENT: Ed Wegner, Randy Volk, and Sherrie Burbank VISITORS: None 1 . Call to Order The February meeting of the Tigard Water Board was called order by Chair Froude at 7:05 p.m. 2. Visitor's Agenda No visitors attended this meeting. 3. Approval of Minutes Commissioner Haunsperger moved and Commissioner Mortensen seconded approval of the January 10, 1994 minutes as submitted. The minutes were approved unanimously. 4. Resignation Acceptance -- Appointment to Vacancy It was noted for the record that George Morgan submitted a letter of resignation to the Tigard Water Board Commissioners. The effective date of his resignation was February 1, 1995. Commissioner Pedersen also presented his letter of resignation for consideration. Chair Froude informed the commissioners that there were two people running for George Morgan's vacated seat -- Pamela Moyers and John Volpe. In addition, Commissioners Mortensen, Froude, and Haunsperger are running unopposed. Norman Penner is also running unopposed for the seat vacated by Art Pedersen. Discussion followed regarding the direction the Board should take.to fill the interim vacancies to assure a quorum is available for the remaining meetings through June 1995. TIGARD WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING -- February 27, 1995 Page 1 Mr. Wegner advised the Board that they have the option of appointing the Commissioner-elects after the March 28 election. Although the Commissioner- elects won't officially take office until July 1, 1995, they can be appointed at the April meeting, to fill the unexpired terms of Morgan and Pedersen. As a point of clarification, it was announced that ballots will be distributed to all residents in the water district unincorporated area. After additional discussion, the Board asked Commissioner Pedersen if he would be willing to extend his resignation date an additional month to assure a quorum at the March meeting. Commissioner Pedersen was in agreement. Since elections will take place on March 28, the Board decided to change their usual meeting date to Wednesday, March 29 at 7:00 p.m. This will provide them with enough time to find out the results of the election. Commissioner Haunsperger moved to accept George Morgan's letter of resignation dated January 24, 1995. He also noted his appreciation for his service on both this Board and the IWB. Commissioner Mortensen seconded the motion. The motion was passed unanimously. 5. Election Update Refer to Agenda Item #4. 6. Intergovernmental Water Board Update Chair Froude reported on her first meeting as representative to the IWB. She acquainted the Commissioners with the other members of the IWB-- Paul Hunt (City of Tigard Council Member), Bill Scheiderich (Member at large), Peggy Manning (City of Durham); Violet Yager (City of King City); and herself. Alternates include: Jan Drangsholt (King City), Commissioner Haunsperger (TWD), and Bob Rolf (Tigard City Council). She informed the Board that Mr. Scheiderich was elected Chair and she was elected Vice-Chair for the next year. She asked Mr. Wegner if he would furnish her with a copy of the IWB bylaws. As TWD alternate, Commissioner Haunsperger would also like a copy of the bylaws and would like to receive copies of the minutes. Mr. Wegner assured each of them that he would take care of this matter. She then summarized the rate analysis RFP discussion that took place at the February IWB meeting and indicated that the IWB made a motion to approve the staff's request to prepare an RFP to solicit bids from vendors to provide this services. She also noted that during the discussion phase of this agenda item TIGARD WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING -- February 27, 1995 Page 2 staff was asked if they could perform this analysis but the Board was informed that staff did not have the expertise at this time. In fact, one of the objectives of using outside consultants is to develop a model that staff can use conduct future rate analyses. Mr. Wegner interjected that City staff needs assistance to conduct a rate analysis of this nature because one has not be performed for several years. He further explained that a computer model will be developed by the consultant and that this model will then be used by Finance to update rates. He revealed that we are one of few districts that has not conducted a rate analysis study for the last five years. Mr. Wegner further stipulated that the intergovernmental agreement requires that the IWB approve any rate increase. The IWB will receive a draft copy of the RFP and will have the opportunity to interview any potential consultant. Staff has already contacted Hillsboro and Tualatin Valley Water to request a copy of their models to be used as outlines when preparing the RFP. Mr. Scheiderich asked staff to also contact Beaverton since they just completed this process. Chair Froude also reported that the IWB handled a "Variance of Hardship" request. She explained that the intergovernmental agreement specifies that the IWB can grant a variance for a financial hardship due to a water line break. Mr. Wegner further explained the particular circumstances surrounding this request. Chair Froude disclosed that after discussion regarding setting a precedence they voted to grant the hardship relieve noting that it was not a unanimous vote. Since the rest of the items would be presented under Agenda Item #7, Chair Froude concluded her report. 7. Director's Report a. Interim Water Plan -- Murray Smith & Associates is working with TVWD to draft and intergovernmental agreement to provide interim water for the Tigard area effective June 1, 1995. It is anticipated that the draft will be completed within the next week and submitted to IWB by their meeting on March 22, 1995. Consumption could be as high as 6 million gpd. Staff has received estimates (approximately $70,000) for the Baylor Street connection tie-in with TVWD. There is still only a verbal commitment from Lake Oswego but we are still getting water. b. Long Range Supply Plan -- Mayor Nicoll and City Administrator Monahan have met with mayor and city administrator from Lake Oswego: Lake Oswego will be meeting in an Executive Session with their Council TIGARD WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING -- February 27, 1995 Page 3 tomorrow night to discuss the agreement between Tigard and Lake Oswego. If they concur with the proposal, then we will move forward. Basically the agreement will assign the water rights to a new agency (named differently than the City of Tigard) for an estimated 42 million gpd. This is Phase 1 of the process. Phase 2 is the composition of the board (Lake Oswego wants a 3 to 2 composition; Tigard wants 2-2-1 which is similar to the composition of our other boards), operating procedures, responsibility for leading the operations, and establishing technical committees so staff can communicate directly with specific people. Tigard City Council instructed staff to proceed on applying for water rights on the Willamette near Wilsonville and the TVWD plants. The application is ready for City Council approval. Mr. Wegner forewarned the Board that Tigard will be very far down the list. The purpose for submitting the application is to make sure that Tigard gets their name on the list based on the regional issues that will be taking place over the next several years. d. Phase 2 of the Regional Water Study -- A preliminary draft of the plan should be completed by July. It is anticipated that a joint meeting will be coordinated to include IWB, Tigard City Council, TWD Board, and the public to hear the presentation. It will be IWB's responsibility to make a recommendation to approve the plan. This recommendation should be presented to the Tigard City Council in November at which time the IWB will ask for final adoption by the Council. As an overview, the plan will address issues relating to buying water regionally, subagreements, storage, etc. Mr. Wegner believes that this plan will not address some of the specific issues such as physical facilities. Once the plan is presented to the City, each participating agency will need to meet to discuss how to implement the plan. There is some uncertainty as to whether or not these deadlines can be met -- can 27 agencies get the preliminary plans in July and get full agreement by November? e. Wells -- Staff is getting quotes to test pumps #2 an #3 in order to bring them on line. However, the State has some concerns regarding the issue of critical ground water on Bull Mountain. It will also be necessary to run and conduct flow tests on well #4 by September. The City was going to try to transfer the pumping rights on well #4, but the State doesn't want the City to do this yet based on the location of the pump -- they believe it may be better to leave it there and try to find a more efficient way to pump it. Part of the problems is that the water has a large iron content which will require intensive maintenance. -Staff is currently reviewing the situation. Further, the State wants the City to TIGARD WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING -- February 27, 1995 Page 4 review the pumping requirements before applying to move the welts to another location. If new technology is available, then the well would be okay and it would give us a better draw for the area. f. Packets of Information for Review - Letter to Commissioner Mortensen from Wayne Lowry (Finance Director) regarding the 1995/96 budget process. - Monthly Water report for January. Mr. Wegner noted that the figures have been updated to reflect the current month. - Income statement which illustrates there is still quite a bit of money. - Letter to Loreen Edin (Risk Manager) regarding TWD insurance coverage. The City's Agent of Record has completed their review and has indicated there are no areas of concern. - Letter from TVWD regarding the Willamette River study project. It was noted that there may be some problems with the Wilsonville tract in that TVWD may be looking at purchasing some farm land. It doesn't look like they will be able to work something out with the State. TVWD doesn't have a partner. Also the State doesn't want to sell the land -- they prefer to lease it. TVWD attorneys indicated that the various bonding authorities they have talked to are hesitant to lease. Chair Froude added that this particular piece of property appears to be highly controversial. Mr. Wegner also told the Commissioners that there appears to be a great deal of interest but no one has submitted a proposal to State Lands at this time. - Progress Report of the Participants Committee (Regional Water Supply Plan) dated February 21, 1995. Chair Froude asked Mr. Wegner if there was a possibility of acquiring a copy of the informational slide show that the Participants Committee has designed for educational purposes. She thought this would be helpful in providing background information to new board members (both TWD and IWB) since this is the committee that is producing the TIGARD WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING -- February 27, 1995 Page 5 Regional Water Supply Plan that will be discussed in July. Her concern surrounded the possibility that some of the new members done have a background of this nature So they are at a disadvantage and this might help get them up-to-speed. Mr. Wegner suggested that staff review the slide show again to see if it is applicable to the Board. His recollection was that the show consisted of slides that had to be narrated and that it was actually designed for the general public who has little knowledge of the water issues. Mr. Wegner also proposed scheduling a time to show the slides on the same night as an IWB meeting and issuing an open invitation to anyone interested in attending. Commissioner Haunsperger also reported there are other documents available for the new members to review and he remembers an informational packet regarding conducting public meetings. Some discussion ensued regarding helpful information for new members. Commissioner Pedersen suggested an organizational chart. He also stated that this information could be useful to other organizations to increase their understanding of the roles of the various boards. Chair Froude commented that she thought Mayor Nicoli wrote a good article in the Cityscape which outlined the IWB and TWD boards direction. She wondered if this information could be distributed to the public outside the City of Tigard -- perhaps through water bills. It would be a good public relations approach. Mr. Wegner told the Board that any water-related articles authored within the City is routed to King City and Durham for inclusion in their newsletters. Chair Froude expressed her opinion of including a copy of Mayor Nicoli's article in the various jurisdictions' local newspapers. Mr. Wegner implied the information might be received better by the citizens if the various city representatives rewrote and signed off on the information rather than Tigard's mayor. He will make this recommendation to the board representatives. He will also ask Mayor Nicoli if he has any objection to distributing this article as a water bill insert so citizens will get additional exposure. 8. Non-Agenda Items TIGARD WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING -- February 27, 1995 Page 6 Mr. Wegner notified the Board that they received a settlement award in the amount of $322.96 as a result of the Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation which was filed in 1992. The City's legal department has reviewed the final court order and is in agreement with the proposed settlement. Commissioner Pedersen moved to accept the settlement for $322.96; Commissioner Haunsperger seconded the motion. Mr. Wegner advised the Board that they should probably include authorization for the Chair to sign the necessary paperwork on behalf of the TWD Board. Both Commissioners agreed to amend their motion and second to include this point. The motion was passed unanimously. 9. Commissioner's Comments Commissioner Mortenson asked for any budget ideas or concerns. She will try to have a draft prepared for the next meeting. A brief discussion regarding bonds, insurance, and capital improvements followed. Commissioner Mortenson will contact last year's budget representatives and other people who expressed an interest in assisting in the budget process. Mr. Wegner informed the Board that he has requested staff to submit their time, printing costs, etc. for the last 6 months for charge-back to TWD. Commissioner Haunsperger thanked staff for a "job well done" in keeping the Board informed. 10. Next Meeting The next meeting has been changed from 3/27/95 to 3/29/95. Chair Froude will contact the other board members by telephone prior to remind them of the meeting and to assure there is a quorum. The meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. TIGARD WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING -- February 27, 1995 Page 7 03-29-1995 10:522IM FROM C.0.T. WATER 1 u t c-+U I-Orli { I TIGA RD WATER DISTRICT INCOME STATEMENT&BALANCE SHEET As of February 28, 1995 INCOME STATEMENT 1 . Accounts I I Prior Y-T-D j I Monthly I I Y-T-D I REVENUES I 1°/QPY Water Sales Revenue Interest Earned 64L29 85.22 726.51 Recovered Expenditures 'otal Revenues 641.29 85.22 726.51 1 EXPENDITURES Prcifessional Services 39.25 284.20 323.45 Coin/actual Services Office Supplies&Expenses Advertising&Elections Dues&Subscriptions 3,326.00 3326.00 Ins>irance 487.05 1,954.00 2,44105 notal Expenditures 3,85230 2,238.20 6,090.50 i 1 BALANCE SHEET • ASSETS Cash&Investments 27,458.55 (2,152.98) 25,305.57 Net Fixed Assets Total Assets 27,458.55 (2,152.98) 25,305.57 1 LIABILITIES& FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts Payable Due Other Funds total Liabilities Fu> d Balance Fuzid Balance 30,669.56 30,669.56 Ex less of Revenues/(Expenditures) (3,211.01) (2,152.98) (5,363.99) otal Fund Balance 27,458.55 (2,152.98) 25,305.57 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance 27,458.55 (2,152.98) 25,305.57 V,l,ce11TWEAMo t dy194-5isbs.xls • TOTAL P.01 FEBRUARY 1995 WATER MONTHLY REPORT Revenues/Expenditures: Month of February Year to Date Prior Yr. to Date % of Budget Revenues: Water Sales $204,300.83 $2,810,942.40 $2,180,471.06 Meter Sales 48,915.00 295,135.00 337,521.77 Developer Fees 0.00 $131,166.68 64,437.43 Other Income 11,388.27 96,474.88 65,349.76 Total Revenue $264,604.10 $3,333,718.96 $2,647,780.02 88% Expenditures: Personal Services $58,435.00 $485,046.00 $561,793.52 Material Services 125,112.67 1,145,722.18 1,157,877.39 Capital Outlay 6,332.31 104,509.93 196,843.89 Cap. Proj. Res. Fund 00.00 00.00 300,000.00 *Total Expends. $189,879.98 $1,735,278.11 $2,216,514.80 62% SDC Fund: $52,602.20 $355,449.12 518,414.44 90% SDC Fund Balance: $1,442,513.88 * City accounting system is on a cash basis Meter Installations: 5/8" x 3/4" 1" 1 1/2" 2" Total Durham 5 0 0 0 5 King City 0 0 0 0 0 Unincorporated Area 50 4 0 0 54 City of Tigard 19 3 0 0 22 Total for February 81 Water Consumption and Loss: Total 100 cubic feet of water purchased or produced 140,130 ccf Plus amount of water from storage during February and consumption not billed in January 39,785 ccf Total 100 cubic feet of water billed <135,858 ccf> Water loss from flushing new lines in subdivisions < 0 ccf> Net amount of water in storage < 15,780 ccf> Amount of water consumed but not yet billed < 20,150 ccf> Total Water loss 8,127 ccf 4.52% Work Accomplished: Durham • Water Division personnel responded to a few requests to check for water leaks or low water pressure at the customer's service and replaced three 5/8" x 3/4" meters that were malfunctioning. King City • Water Division personnel responded to three requests to check for low or no water consumption. Also, Water personnel replaced two 5/8" x 3/4" water meters that were malfunctioning. • Water Division personnel replaced two meter boxes with traffic water meter boxes and replaced a section of the concrete sidewalk that had to be removed in order to complete the repairs. Unincorporated Area • Water Division personnel replaced a defective angle stop on a water service. • Water Division repaired six 3/4-inch water services that were damaged during the sewer main line installation for Humboldt Creek Estates. This project is located on SW Fonner Street. • Water Division personnel removed a 3/4-inch water service in the Bull Mountain Meadows 4 subdivision. City of Tigard • Water Division personnel replaced ten 3/4-inch pressure regulators, eight 5/8" x 3/4" water meters that were malfunctioning, and raised four water meters to the correct elevation. In addition Water staff also responded to nine calls to check on water leaks at the meter, replace damaged meter boxes or checked reports of low water pressure. • Water Division personnel potholed SW Bontia Road at the Fanno Creek bridge to determine the location of the 24-inch and 12-inch water mains. City of Tigard has plans for a road improvement that includes widening of the bridge. • Water Division personnel helped the Streets Division with sanding of the roads during the inclement weather of February. Operational Changes: . The Utility Division, which consists of sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water distribution, started to cross-train employees to create a more versatile work group. One employee from sanitary sewer exchanged positions with a water employee for the month of February. In March two other employees will exchange positions. Status Report: CH2M Hill, who has been authorized by the City to perform further analysis to verify the exact amount of surplus water that would be available from Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) to our service area, has, as of March 9, 1995, completed some preliminary model runs. Preliminary results indicate that 4.3 MGD may be available. TVWD has requested that Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue perform hydrant flow tests in the area of the Baylor Street reservoirs to verify residual flows. The rough draft of an IGA between TVWD and the City for the delivery of water to the City has been reviewed and revised by Murray Smith and Associates (MSA). City staff and TVWD are currently reviewing the latest revision. The pump tests at the Terminal Reservoir site have been completed and indicate that we can draw an additional 10 feet from the reservoir without adversely effecting the pump. The additional 10 feet equals 2.7 million gallons of water. The ability to draw an additional 10 feet from the Terminal Reservoir will allow us to transfer water to the High Tor reservoirs, from the Terminal Reservoir, for an extra 1.5 to 2 days without jeopardizing the 410 zone, our main reservoir zone, during the summer. City staff and MSA met with a representative from Oregon Water Resources and discussed the transfer of well water rights from one location to another. Water Resources advised us that to transfer the water rights from one location to another is a difficult and time consuming process, and we would be better off to fully utilize our existing water rights. Water Resources also indicated that we can increase our pumping rate to the permitted flow rates without violating the critical ground water order. r 'y d F 1. 22 t C 3 3} SS';i,'4 j Y''� T . ( t>4 k .Ya.3 E k° @' 83".9"f f hK�l` .�' �✓,�.Sys; . ^, ,.:?$ '� u 3:.,,ks �� "s`�" '.n' ' &i;-, 4 %,t €Y,vim "N��..,,.st ,..�.,.X. ,.��3'',<., March 28, 1995 Since the last meeting of the Participants Committee on February 21, 1995 the Project Management Staff have been involved in the following activities: 1) Staff have met with consultants about the public involvement program and the institutional element to discuss the process from now till the issuance of the Preliminary Plan in July. A meeting of the public involvement subcommittee will be set up prior to the next steering committee. 2)Staff have met with BCI staff to discuss the conservation program report and the review process for the Conservation Coalition and the Steering Committee to review that document. 3)Staff attended a meeting at WRD in Salem on the budget issues regarding the state funded share of a Corps reauthorization study for the Willamette projects on February 23. WRD staff will present an alternative for the participants to review for presentation to the legislative subcommittee responsible for reviewing the WRD budget. The ideas discussed ways to reduce this biennium share including such things moving to a four year time span, when the actual start date would be,and if other local match shares could be generated. A fair amount of time was spent discussing the potential opposition of the agricultural community to having a reauthorization feasibility study conducted at all. 4)Staff reviewed the Columbia River National Estuary Program nomination agreement. Contact DEQ staff to suggest that the discussion of beneficial uses note that the Columbia is under study as a potential municipal supply source for the Portland metropolitan region. 5) Staff made a presentation to the Water Services Leadership Group meeting on March 6 about the outcomes for the Phase 2 process and the public involvement process. 6)Staff attended the Metro WRPAC subcommittee on Water Resources and Open Spaces meeting on March 8. The Metro work program for refining the Metro 2040 growth management decision was outlined and this group provided input on the refinement of the unbuildable lands inventory and discussed the type of recommendations that might be made about adequate standards for providing adequate water management inside the UGB. 7)Staff met with three members of the Denver Water Department to discuss with them the IRP process and desired outcomes of the RWSP for our region and how this compared with the situation in Denver. 8)Staff attended the Metro MTAC meeting on March 9 and received information on the refinement of the population forecasts that Metro is conducting at this time. The major point is that the area has grown faster than prior predictions since 1990 and this has resulted in less land supply left inside the current UGB than was anticipated. The moire detailed Metro 2015 population forecasts are being developed now and will likely reflect these faster growth rates. 9)Staff has coordinated the printing and distribution of the conservation program to the Col/Willamette Conservation Coalition. • 10)Staff have met with the consultants to discuss revisions to the environmental rankings based on the review of these materials as drafted. 11)Staff participated in the public involvement subcommittee meeting which occurred on March 10. 12)Staff have been working to assist in any refinements to the current water system assumptions as they will be reflected in the IRP model,particularly those related to the Portland wellfield and some of the smaller systems as they play into the transmission analysis. 13) Staff made presentations to the Geological Society of the Oregon Country and the Portland Garden Club about the RWSP utilizing the slide show, handout materials, and discussion. 14) Staff met with Metro staff to discuss the adoption process for the RWSP and the Metro role in that adoption process as well as aspects of the Metro water supply element of the Metro Regional Framework Plan. A report will be made as a part of the PC agenda for March 28. 15) Staff attended a Metro MTAC meeting on March 23 and listened to discussions about the redevelopment land survey and some bills being considered by the Legislature on standards for the urban growth boundary and on expedited hearings processes for subdivisions in urban growth boundaries. 16) Staff reviewed and provided comments to Montgomery Watson about the results of the analysis of flow impacts from a third Bull Run dam in the Bull Run and Sandy Rivers. The results of this analysis will enable a representative mitigation strategy to be incorporated into the IRP process to reflect the costs involved with flow mitigation. 17) Staff attended the Col/Will Conservation Coalition meeting on March 21 along with consultant staff at which the conservation programs packages were discussed and reviewed. Staff is coordinating the response from the Coalition for the Steering Committee. 18) Staff have met with Montgomery Watson to discuss the refinements to the evaluation criteria, rankings, and justification language for the water quality and the environmental elements. F..6 5�Y323-6133 BUREAU OF WJA 1 t}t 238 PD1=01 MAR R 87 '95 �9[3�2 0. 4 LI) I OF mike+cane Comuasione/ Michael F.Rosentew, .:�,�1 PORTLAND, OREGON �&W 5t;Avenue Po ttand Gregor►972044 kin BUREAU WATERWORKFox(503)823-6133 S "mattock( }x.7404 March 6, 1995 SENT VIA FAX PALE 1 of I TO: P.nd�.. aomi Gat Company Water CIVISEAVit Iv7r5 Burlington Water Distr Julie Monvw taffy off Beaverton, Charlie Harrison City ofGresham,Ktzly Thomi City ofHillsboro, RayDenny City of Newberg, Chuck Liebert City of Candy,Mike Walker v City of Tigattt, Ed Weper City of Trousdale, BdEnbicld City of T•a'•at-n, Bmilie Iroeri Lake trove Won., Anna Redding Oak Lodge Water, Toes Hoffman. Powell Valley Water, David Gilbey Talatin Valley Water Dist, Kent Donegan Valley View Water, Marilyn Stevenson League of Oregon Cities,Anti Law PROM: Cindy Dim, Conservation Program Manager C5) RE: Detailed Update-NW Ow Partzership Proven! *List d bel.w are the mitigative flambe"-of water conservation kits that have been sent to t ustomers within your s 'v'ive areas as of the end of February. Ttds information provides some interesting statistics regarding the lrsvd of customer participation within your area. Keep in mind that we conservation Irk (which on retrofit two bathrooms)was sent to all households requesting 1 or 2 shoe. ds. ^r ter Pr"oi:der Tigard c ha t oars mailed: 5,966 # requests for I show moi: w1 7:wq� u for 2 r au- ed : 3,503 ��,! Teal number of households reque nlg showerheada: 4,102 T numb=b=of shosveit=ds salt: 7,603 % hoosehoidt requ-gdng one shown-. :* 10% (18%) % households wiesting two sow ruffs:- 58% (38%) % households requing either 1 or 2 s rawer s:* 69% (57%) *These numb=dao based on the number of requests as a percent of total offers mailed within yvor service territory. The second number (shown in parenthesis) is the program average hazed on all resift.ftom the pardciwting water providers listed above. is allows you to empare your a-ea's ,iciiru ,in rela iouship to the program average. '1:N - AR:Me . MAR-15-95 WED 16:05 MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOC. FAX NO. 503 225 9022 P. 02 AGREEMENT FOR WATER SUPPLY THIS AGREEMENT FOR WATER SUPPLY is made and entered into effective 1995, by and between the CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal corporation (herein called"City") and TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, a domestic water supply district formed under ORS Ch. 264 (herein called "District"). RECITES: A. City is duly authorized and formed under statutes and it's charter. District is a domestic water supply district, organized and - y-ting under the laws of the State of Oregon_ }"{• : B. City presently provides water servic9io residents' $ pursuant lo separate intergovernmental cooperation : , is ter servi.- to the citizens of the Cities of Durham, King City and the Tigard Wat _,± triet_ C. ORS 190.0 . 03 to 190.110 ::��,��'��E�: :,. units •.zf' • government to enter into intergovernmental agreements for th'! .• orrn `".- of their duties or for the exercise ofpowers conf•� ' Y them, , M. i,! . , D,• s ss: agreements for the sale of surplus water are expressly autho f• • D. Di, r.• � <; that it is in the best interests of its rate payers for 4142' e District to E,} er into _*, tra 1 or the sale of surplus water_ e < a ry E E. ': :.has agr.j b that execution of a long-term agreement for the vr: purchase of water >„; r�istnc will provide greater likelihood of reliable water supply to City_ F. The service and commodity provided by District are a special contract service and are not provided by District as a eornrnon utility service. THEREFORE. the parties agree as follows: Page 1 Agreement for Water Supply 3/15/95 MAR-15-95 WED 16:05 MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOC. FAX NO. 503 225 9022 P. 03 1. Supply of Sur tus Water ar�d Tenn of Agreement a. Subject to the other provisions of this Agreement, District will furnish to City a firm supply of potable, surplus water for City's present water service area for a ten(10) year period be Inning July 1, 1995 through June 30, 2005, subject to renewal, extension, or termination and on the terms and conditions as set forth in this Agreement. The parties understand and agree that this Agreement is an interim measure until City can secure a permanent source and that the City is presently pursuing the development of a long-term water supply as .,; i~rmanent source_ Therefore the City may, at its discretion, choose to puri t:.,,..„.$1 :- um water purchase from District allowed under the terms o',I agreement <; a lesser amount on a year round basis or on a seasontill6 .' to ItAtent basis. The development of the long-term supply by the City :•''al ,- «- e the City's actual need and use of water from the District wlu•c, .a.%:n= •t at the - - of executing this agreement be determined. .: g` b. City -, ii'i.w,e the . „to purchase up to six (6) million gallons per day of its water r 'a ..,aa a R,t s'-V:-Ct. 2_ - cqq. .;�: 1 •s1 r-<;on. or other Chanute of Organization. Sh• • the entire"'';rt 'ce . ,-1-a of City be merged, consolidated, or otherwise joined with I :�;fi;a.•+ , or an ' ` a ty created pursuant.to ORS Ch. 450, then this Agreement shall • e'',a .'s' ull and void at the time of such transfer, and District or the new entity shall beebme responsible for that portion of City's costs as set forth in Section I0 and 11. 3. Other Sources. City will also obtain water from other state-approved sources_ Page 2 -Agreement for Water Supply 3/15/95 . HAR-15-95 WED 16:06 HURRAY, SMITH & ASSOC. FAX NO. 503 225 9022 P. 04 4. Connections. Meters. and Stora., City will provide and maintain meters, valves, and controls, as approved by District, in proper order for water transmission line connections points. City will arrange to have its meters tested and calibrated by an independent tester qualified to do such work not less than annually. A copy of the test report shall be forwarded to District. City shall own and maintain the transmission line necessary to furnish water to City from the point of connection, as hereinabove set forth, to the existing distribution system of City. Unless otherwise agreed, City ., ees to furnish at its expense any District-approved pumping stations, pre e s '�'>_, ing valves, and other equipment, located within or without the bv1ies of Dist `` _ ch my be necessary to convey, control, and meter the , . .. old) city by District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, District shall mainta . ch valves and devices to control flows from its reservoirs and sy ',11,;1,.. ,,. ity's sys It is intended that the District will elp 4, u i'r, y 6 million gallons of water per day to the District. The 41, = ;',;,',1k,'; points a 'f :y include, but shall not be'United to the following locations: .3.:.,,z,,,,:,.., „. e si £: � a"4 . ',4isti.,or •'''',,,;a, our Cas«„ Av•4�e , r Green<_;. g Road y¢5 District �•`''' e that additional connection points may be added by written consent fro. both entities. 5. Continuity of Services. a. By execution of this Agreement, City agrees that District will provide"firm" service of six (6) million gallons per day (MGD) for peak day usage. Page 3 - Agreement for Water Supply 3/15/95 4, MAR-15-95 WED 16:07 MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOC. FAX NO. 503 225 9022 P. 05 Peak daydemand shall mean the ' highest total peak day's flow at any time during the year. "Finn"service means that continuity shall be maintained by District to the extent feasible in the same manner as service to District's own inhabitants and other direct service customers. If a general emergency or water shortage requires restrictions on the delivery of water, then general restrictions placed upon deliveries to the rum purchasers shall be determined by a similar method to that used for restricting deliveries to District by the City of Portland and District's direct service customers, to-wit: pro-rata reduction. If localized emerg:. ., • problems occur, 2 4,l: temporary service interruptions may result_ "41, b. It is recognized by both Parti 'that emergenc%-f.. _ ation measure may have to be implemented by D- ? `O.'? ar. :A .to meet an emergency t , condition_ City shall implement such emergency co'" .4�, ation measures as well. City shall be included in discussions lea. e-.$41, decision ,i, pleuient the measures. c. District will provide .y,:�. '''V''' ity if District determines that such interruption or red • t eoessar :or reasonable for system emergencies or to install equipment, i .., . a cats, investigations, and inspections or hotv . . perform other ce .- S in District's system or other parts of the system >' :gt. 4, r P� supplying ,. . Except `'"{I -es ';y�emergency and in order that City's operations will 11,,�� flaw i not be unr.. ,.. *ly in - f:. with.District also shall give City ten (10) days written notice of any such JyiPlion or reduction, the reason therefore, and the probable duration thereof. District agrees to exercise reasonable diligence and foresight to repair, replace, and maintain its facilities so as to provide a normal flow and pressure of water to the point of City's connections during the life of this Agreement. Page 4 - Agreement for Water Supply 3/15/95 NAR-15-95 WED 16:07 MURRAY, S i I TH & ASSOC. FAX NO. 503 225 9022 P. 06 6_ Contract Demand. The present peak day demand for the first year of this Agreement is six (8) million gallons per day. Each year thereafter. City will notify District of the forecasted peak day's demand and the average annual amount of water needed for the next current year and the next ten(10)years. District will conduct a study every four(4) years in conjunction with a rate study to forecast total District demand. This will incorporate the annual forecast of demand by City and other users. The amount of the quadrennial forecast demand determined by the Dis. '�;' ' establish the City's firm ,$..:.,. allowable future annual peak days demand. `'r �rtS/ 7. Water Quality. The quality of water delivered to Citys :>+ ::r u of this Agr ement shall comply with all applicable provisions of state and f .4 law, rules and regulations. Both parties agreek-.� =; j "I Y this provision will rz� •'r,�;�, ding on t%tti. 'ct where an emergency pride ,t exists and best efforts and reasonable • ^tt' h• '�: been exercised. ' 8- Area Suon1.}',M The City pr- rax ' <s, r ,Pathe residents within the boundaries of the • City, to the City a„;t City, c r, e City of Durham and to the Tigard Water District. 9 n on-;-- �� , `i e I m(tations. sty City = y`f';_. that it ,5i not, without obtaining written approval of District, sell or "wheel" water to ""SA,,. r entity outside its corporate boundaries other than existing commitments previously described in Section 8. No rights may be assigned under this Agreementwithout the written consent of District_ 10. Rates. City will pay monthly to District for all water passing meters described above at Page 5 -Agreement for Water Supply 3/15/95 MAR-15-95 WED 16:08 MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOC. FAX NO. 503 225 9022 P. 07 a rate of seventy eight and one one hundredth cents (78.10 per 100 cubic feet (eel), effective through June 30, 1990. Effective on each successive July 1 during the term of this Agreement, or any renewal thereof, the rate shall be retained, raised, or lowered in accordance with the criteria set forth in Section 11 and adopted by resolution of the District_ 11. Rate Setting Criteria. a. Rate-Making Principles and Policies. ' Water rates shall be established under this Agreeme.s using the cost of debt service for transmission pipeline facilities jointly used,qie c•:';€ water purchased by the District from the City of Portland, the cost offing alterna ppply from the Hillsboro, Forest Grove,Beaverton,Tualatin' :-`• ,',>,,,.W a <?istrict, Jb t Water Commission, the total How metered annually througrc.5,ie transmission pipelines, the annual allocation of administrative an -e'1 •n and m''r';` tenance costs by the City of Portland on the transmission pipelin z;na ' j: • administrative charge by the District. The initial watt '''' • ; ' :• by the following components (assets and water volumes! r es a will be revised annually to reflect the current water use experi- and for r" - `:'- -es: 1 '�y •ge Daliater Volume of District through transmission pipelines was 2033 million _' Y;,,L per day or 9,920,751-100 cf 2. Water •e for City of Portland Area 5 Rate $0.495 per 100 cf 3. Gravity Line Debt.Service Paid to Portland for Washington County Supply Page 6 - Agreement for Water Supply 3/15/95 14,AR-15-95 WED 16:09 HURRAY, SMITH & ASSOC. FAX NO. 503 225 9022 P. 08 Line - $1,329,380,63 $0.134 per 100 cf 4. Gravity Line Debt Service for Costs of Metzger Pipeline $790,429.08 $0.080 per 100 of 5. All Line Operation& Maintenance and City of Portland Allocation of Administration$23,480.00 $0.002 per 100 of S. Cost of Acquiring Alternate Supply from the Joint Water Commissionter...a t O100 cf per �- ''off••, 7. Wheeling Administrative Charge t y1 I .i::"tyo 0,100 of x`4:3' TOTAL COST OF WATER PER LFf z"Fk :m $0.781 In the event of the addition, modification, or 5' 4, titution by District of assets that are used by District to supply City eye desert a on of facilities shall be modified accordingly. These new facilitio'ma be`` '."luded in any computation notwithstanding the fact . ". e time o.;.uch inclusion they have not been formally included wi 'r ' f' i' a �a . �� .� :•,,.. b. Ex.� Ar.-'on Facilities Cost (Jointly Financed Facilities)_ • 'fit cr New,:. •; -i• fa i c-',a es s:R , if required, will be allocated between City and • f r District servie -'�� stamens the basis of their ultimate shares of the design capacities of these' :k,',�';`es. The allocation of the casts of such facilities will be based on the projections :de or reviewed by an independent consultant at the time of each rate study. c. Provision for Emergency Surcharge. 1. In the event of a severe drought, major catastrophe, or other Page 7 - Agreement for Water Supply 3/15/95 NAR-15-95 WED 16 09 HURRAY, Si1TR & RSSOC, FAX NO, 503 225 9022 P. 09 extraordinary conditions that require emergency expenditures to maintain a sufficient water supply, it may be necessary for District to impose, by resolution, an emergency surcharge on City in order to pay for such expenditures. An equitable portion of these costs will be allocated to City in accordance with the principles set forth in Section 11, and may be recovered through an emergency surcharge. 2_ An emergency surcharge based on water usage may be implemented immediately upon passage of the authorizing resolution and apply to all regular billings thereafter transmitted and may continue as long . ;,g.ecessary to pay for emergency expenditures, , 12. Meters installed to measure the volume` ; :ter '� . by District to City shall be , read periodically by representatives of District at i 5 `i- lxed by mutual agreement of • District and City. Representatives of k:.a :,<. •• prese ?`s�°'`:t meter readings. District �•(f , shall compute and render bills and sta • +; to by the 15th day of each month_ 4.If the meters at anytime ,_ + urately ens ure the water passage through said : meters, the charge fo a r ; • time said meters are out of order shall ,.fir be based upon a : . consumption as shown by said meters when in proper o• 5"F'' _ conditis ass t unn a comparable period of service, District shall invoice City oath f■ °Water usage in the preceding month. 13. Pa r_it`'St During the t• + of this Agreement, City shall, bry the 30th day of each month, pay to District the sums due based on the rates and charges provided in Section 10 and 11 of this Agreement. Page 8 -Agreement for Water Supply 3/15/95 • Aimuniffivammeimoim I'IAR-15-95 WED 16:10 HURRAY, SMITH & ASSOC. FAX NO. 503 225 9022_ — P. 10 h> 14. D_isputes/Attorneys' Fees. Dispute shall be settled by proceedings in the Washington County Circuit Court unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. If suit or action is commenced, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys'fees, including any appeal therefrom. 15. Limitation of Liability. City recon and agrees that no liability for damages shall attach to District hereunder on account of any failure to accurately anticipatz.;availability of water, or because of actual failure of supply due to any damage t<Dis a.'- source, equipment, 'kA pipelines, or facilities caused by vandalism, war, Oft invasion, fir-" ,., , ental -F''3" t` restrictions, strikes, inability to procure su• •i'r `/..s ct o d, or oth `causes beyond its control. `' 16. Coordination and Co - F/i: `;f . �' District shall notify City not lees t 'i: ::. .',tip=f days prior to the date any proposed changes to rate; :1'e: IAR-15-95 WED 16:11 HURRAY, SMITH & ASSOC. FAX NO. 503 225 9022 P. 11 the Public Utility Commission. It is not engaged in the water business and was not created to sell water outside the corparated limits of District, except surplus water not needed by District and its inhabitants, and that the citizens and inhabitants of District have the prior right to use of the water distributed by the District water system. District herewith expresses confidence in its desire and ability to furnish sufficient surplus water to meet the needs of City, but in the event there should ever arise in the.future an inability on the part of District to furnish sufficient surplus water to City, it is understood that District shall not be lia.. 'on account of any such liabty. 3 4 -It., . `.ut My 18. Planning 's 3' City agrees to report to District its annt , d •. k,day total/system demand for each year following the term hereof ending D:•• tdku,,, 31. City shall also forecast Va v.j 4 its water requirements to be supplied :i i t inn acco? ', ce with Section fi. Such forecast shall reflect the best judgment o": ",,�_ S -information shall be furnished to.District no Iater than t5 .i April,'t of each year. City also agrees' Idry ,; •o F 4 o 4 r data relating to water supplies as may •''+•,- ,n;,;;.:7-" be required by tt ,-r. 4 f?<�•r j' -_ • •ruling purposes, provided that supplying such .y,. :ask Y�. tom.; fr ,0' data shall ' ''reasonably ', In t means of City. Records relevant to water supply and sump?'s ' within con ' possession of District or City will be provided to the other 7K, C" y upon reasonable r' . . WP 19. Ter rzireation. This Agreement is conditioned upon the faithful performance by both parties of all terms and provisions hereof which on its part are to be kept and performed. If City withdraws areas within the District's boundaries, then this Agreement shall terminate . Page 10 - Agreement for Water Supply 3/15/95 LIAR-15-95 WED 16:11 MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOC, FAX NO. 503 225 8022 P. 12_ on the next succeeding June 30 from the effective date of withdrawal. Either patty may terminate this Agreement on account of breach of its material terms by the other party upon 365 days written notice. 20. Renewal. This Agreement may be renewed upon mutual agreement. if City wishes to renew, it shall give notice, in writing, to District no later than twelve (121 months prior to expiration of the original term of this Agreement. The parties shall then meet to } negotiate an extension which shall not exceed then(10) y-..`� '. 21. notice. 37. a_ Any notice under this Agre- . 't s all be in • €« '.and shall be effective when actually delivered or when depd in t rail, addfc sed to the parties at such addresses as either party may des" by written notice to each other- ""4:15.4, District: Administrator " fr .441 Tutu: J " 1t�, rs : Water �> _trio .Y Tarr 1 y •1 > 1. �JeYI f .J -•' ert e" regan 97003 e ` l City if a nr 4' -1: � City o d 'GY '1� Blvd_ :;IfY'"• `' SW I lLtcl[l Blvd_ •;3ss •ard, Oregon 97223 b_ Communications related water system operations or supply shall be performed by the District Operations Manager or Engineer. Communications with the City shall be through the City Maintenance Services Director or the Director's Page 11 -Agreement for Water Supply 3/15/95 • MAR-15-95 WED 16:13 MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOC, FAX NO. 503 225 9022 P. 13 designee. 22. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective as of day of , 1995, and continue until terminated as herein provided. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Tualatin Valley Water District, pursuant to a proper Resolution dated the day of , 1995, duly authorizing the President and Secretary of its Board of Commissioners to execute this instrument on its behalf, and the said City of Tigard, pursuant to a Resolution dated the. day of 4et 1995, duly authorizing the Mayor and Recorder to exece rh a eement on its behalf,have caused this Agreement to be signed, duplicate, as .`y. : : flay and year Ja fust hereinabove written. '"P CITY OF TIGARD '$ h UALATI I?.• ALLEY WATER DISTRICT, a municipal corporation water supply district ay3/' F�I• VR'ti Mayorbre', <�s. Y. President A . .. p i by by Recorder ' Secretary Page 12 - Agreement for Water Supply 3/15/95 \ 510 PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION 800 NE OREGON ST #16 ( STE 540 ) PORTLAND, OR 97232-TEL : 731-4093 NOTIFICATION OF BOUNDARY CHANGE PROPOSAL DATE : April 3, 1995 TO: Tigard Water District ATTN : Board of Directors The Boundary Commission has received a proposal (No . 3459 ) to annex certain territory to the City of Tigard. The area involved is shown on the attached map. Basic information on this proposal is as follows : Area : 10. 07 acres Existing Land Use : Single family dwellings 1 Multi-family units 0 Commercial structures 0 Industrial structures 0 Other -- Total Estimated Population : 4 Current Assessed Value : $131, 640. 00 Current Zoning : County R-6 Reason For Annexation : Applicants wish to receive City services to facilitate development. Proposed Development: Forty single-family residences. If you wish to make written comments or recommendations , please present a letter to this office no later than April 24, 1995, or attend the Public Hearing on the above matter , to be held on Thursday, May 4, 1995 at 7 : 00 p.m. in Room 602, Multnomah County Courthouse, 1021 SW 4th Ave . , Portland , Oregon. Kenneth S. Martin Executive Officer KSM/dw enc . 1 • TIGARD WATER DISTRICT INCOME STATEMENT & BALANCE SHEET As of March 31, 1995 INCOME STATEMENT 1 Accounts I ( Prior Y- T -D I I Monthly I I Y - T -D I REVENUES 1%PY Water Sales Revenue Interest Earned 726.51 130.23 856.74 Recovered Expenditures Total Revenues 726.51 130.23 856.74 EXPENDITURES Professional Services 323.45 323.45 Contractual Services Office Supplies &Expenses Advertising & Elections Dues& Subscriptions 3,326.00 3,326.00 Insurance 2,441.05 2,441.05 Total Expenditures 6,090.50 6,090.50 BALANCE SHEET ASSETS Cash & Investments 25,305.57 130.23 25,435.80 Net Fixed Assets Total Assets 25,305.57 130.23 25,435.80 LIABILITIES & FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts Payable Due Other Funds Total Liabilities Fund Balance Fund Balance 30,669.56 , .. _30,669.56 Excess of Revenues/(Expenditures) (5,363.99) 130.23 (5,233.76) Total Fund Balance 25,305.57 130.23 25,435.80 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance 25,305.57 130.23 25,435.80 g:\Excel\TWD\Monthly\94-5isbs.xis MARCH 1995 WATER MONTHLY REPORT Revenues/Expenditures: Month of March Year to Date Prior Yr. to Date % of Budget Revenues: Water Sales $301,117.48 $3,112,059.88 $2,596,017.16 Meter Sales 50,970.00 346,105.00 386,485.93 Developer Fees 0.00 $131,166.68 64,437.43 Other Income 7,109.30 103,584.18 89,532.50 Total Revenue $264,604.10 $3,692,915.74 $3,136,473.02 97% Expenditures: Personal Services $55,486.16 $533,429.88 $624,484.27 Material Services 126,297.04 1,272,019.22 1,267,282.84 Capital Outlay 13,456.23 117,966.16 182,738.65 Cap. Proj. Res. Fund 00.00 00.00 300,000.00 *Total Expends. $195,239.43 $1,923,415.26 $2,374,505.76 52% SDC Fund: $55,095.39 $410,544.51 518,414.44 104% SDC Fund Balance: $1,497,609.27 * City accounting system is on a cash basis Meter Installations: 5/8" x 3/4" 1" 1 1/2" 2" Total Durham 10 0 0 0 10 King City 0 0 0 0 0 Unincorporated Area 35 0 0 0 35 City of Tigard 33 2 1 0 36 Total for March 81 Water Consumption and Loss: Total 100 cubic feet of water purchased or produced 169,980 ccf Plus amount of water from storage during March and consumption not billed in February 20,150 ccf Total 100 cubic feet of water billed <148,719 ccf> Water loss from flushing new lines in subdivisions < 1,690 ccf Net amount of water in storage < 9,500 ccf> Amount of water consumed but not yet billed < 15.650 ccf *Total Water loss 14,571 ccf 8.57% * Includes water loss due to cleaning of the 10 MG reservoir . Work Accomplished: Durham • Water Division personnel responded to a few routine requests to check for water leaks or low water pressure at the customer's service. • Water Division personnel replaced a damaged angle stop on SW Ellman Lane. King City • Water Division personnel responded to five requests to check for low or no water consumption. Unincorporated Area • Water Division personnel replaced three 5/8" x 3/4" water meters; two 3/4- inch pressure regulators; adjusted two 3/4-inch water services; and responded to ten requests to check water leaks at the meter, low water usage, and low pressure problems. • Water Division personnel relocated a fire hydrant further south from the street on SW Beef Bend Road just east of SW 131st Avenue. Area residents were concerned that the existing location was a vehicle hazard. City of Tigard • Water Division personnel replaced two 3/4-inch pressure regulators and five 5/8" x 3/4" water meters that were malfunctioning. In addition Water staff also responded to 13 calls to check on water leaks at the meter, replace damaged meter boxes or checked reports of low water pressure. • Water Division personnel potholed SW Durham Road in various locations to determine the location and depth of the 12-inch water main in relationship to storm sewer crossings, power pole locations, and catch basins. Washington County has plans for a road improvement project that includes three lanes, bike path, sidewalks, and the widening of the Fanno Creek bridge. • Water Division personnel installed 14 3/4-inch water services for Pebble Creek Estates, a single family residential development located on SW Scholls Ferry Road north of SW Walnut Street. • Water Division personnel installed 40 3/4-inch water services and two 1- inch water services for Hillshire Summit Estates No. 2, a single family residential development located at the summit of Bull Mountain, easf of SW Benchview Terrace. • Water Division personnel repaired a fire hydrant that was damaged by a unknown vehicle along SW Greenburg Road. • Water Division personnel relocated a fire hydrant located in the Aspen Ridge development that was to close to the wheel chair ramp of the sidewalk. • Water Division personnel relocated a fire hydrant, installed a 2-inch water service and installed a 1 1/2-inch water meter for the new American Legion Hall located on SW Scoffins Street at SW Ash Avenue. • Water Division personnel updated a meter vault to comply with confined space entry requirements and also replaced the 3-inch compound meter for the Englewood Apartment complex off of SW Springwood Drive. Operational Changes: The Utility Division continued its efforts in cross training employees from the water, sanitary sewer, and storm water crews. The 10 million gallon reservoir was drained and cleaned during the month of March. Status Report: During the routine cleaning of the 10 million gallon reservoir, a separation between the concrete wall and the curbing inside of the reservoir was noted. Upon further examination the separation was the result from the Scotts Mill, "spring break quake", earthquake from 1993. Other than the separation, there was no structural damage to the reservoir and no leaks were discovered. Repairs to the reservoir, sealing of the separation, is scheduled for April. The reservoir will be back in service before May 15, 1995. "ikafri4A-1-fAlt A 3/2. s/5 y 9r r:. m4 ri,, >K k'ry , ! Y.�' -. ` �+�'�>,.3 .`n�.� .4„� .v �.o �i*al.\�M�4�J� e' �� . . c:;4¢' March 28, 1995 Since the last meeting of the Participants Committee on February 21, 1995 the Project Management Staff have been involved in the following activities: 1) Staff have met with consultants about the public involvement program and the institutional element to discuss the process from now till the issuance of the Preliminary Plan in July. A meeting of the public involvement subcommittee will be set up prior to the next steering committee. 2)Staff have met with BCI staff to discuss the conservation program report and the review process for the Conservation Coalition and the Steering Committee to review that document. 3)Staff attended a meeting at WRD in Salem on the budget issues regarding the state funded share of a Corps reauthorization study for the Willamette projects on February 23. WRD staff will present an alternative for the participants to review for presentation to the legislative subcommittee responsible for reviewing the WRD budget. The ideas discussed ways to reduce this biennium share including such things moving to a four year time span, when the actual start date would be,and if other local match shares could be generated. A fair amount of time was spent discussing the potential opposition of the agricultural community to having a reauthorization feasibility study conducted at all. 4)Staff reviewed the Columbia River National Estuary Program nomination agreement. Contact DEQ staff to suggest that the discussion of beneficial uses note that the Columbia is under study as a potential municipal supply source for the Portland metropolitan region. 5) Staff made a presentation to the Water Services Leadership Group meeting on March 6 about the outcomes for the Phase 2 process and the public involvement process. 6)Staff attended the Metro WRPAC subcommittee on Water Resources and Open Spaces meeting on March 8. The Metro work program for refining the Metro 2040 growth management decision was outlined and this group provided input on the refinement of the unbuildable lands inventory and discussed the type of recommendations that might be made about adequate standards for providing adequate water management inside the UGB. 7)Staff met with three members of the Denver Water Department to discuss with them the IRP process and desired outcomes of the RWSP for our region and how this compared with the situation in Denver. 8)Staff attended the Metro MTAC meeting on March 9 and received information on the refinement of the population forecasts that Metro is conducting at this time. The major point is that the area has grown faster than prior predictions since 1990 and this has resulted in less land supply left inside the current UGB than was anticipated. The more detailed Metro 2015 population forecasts are being developed now and will likely reflect these faster growth rates. 9)Staffhas coordinated the printing and distribution of the conservation program to the Col/Willamette Conservation Coalition. 10)Staff have met with the consultants to discuss revisions to the environmental rankings based on the review of these materials as drafted. 11)Staff participated in the public involvement subcommittee meeting which occurred on March 10. 12)Staff have been working to assist in any refinements to the current water system assumptions as they will be reflected in the IRP model,particularly those related to the Portland wellfield and some of the smaller systems as they play into the transmission analysis. 13) Staff made presentations to the Geological Society of the Oregon Country and the Portland Garden Club about the RWSP utilizing the slide show,handout materials, and discussion. 14) Staff met with Metro staff to discuss the adoption process for the RWSP and the Metro role in that adoption process as well as aspects of the Metro water supply element of the Metro Regional Framework Plan. A report will be made as a part of the PC agenda for March 28. 15) Staff attended a Metro MTAC meeting on March 23 and listened to discussions about the redevelopment land survey and some bills being considered by the Legislature on standards for the urban growth boundary and on expedited hearings processes for subdivisions in urban growth boundaries. 16) Staff reviewed and provided comments to Montgomery Watson about the results of the analysis of flow impacts from a third Bull Run dam in the Bull Run and Sandy Rivers. The results of this analysis will enable a representative mitigation strategy to be incorporated into the IRP process to reflect the costs involved with flow mitigation. 17) Staff attended the Col/Will Conservation Coalition meeting on March 21 along with consultant staff at which the conservation programs packages were discussed and reviewed. Staff is coordinating the response from the Coalition for the Steering Committee. 18) Staff have met with Montgomery Watson to discuss the refinements to the evaluation criteria, rankings, and justification language for the water quality and the environmental elements. ` r ,,, :_ , _ " tel ■1iir Nill p it I■ie11 IN This information provided by the City of Tigard,your water service provider. 4 4::.,tip'-_. ,. `"£ Make sure sprinkler heads deliver water close to the ground.This helps prevent water loss to evaporation.The use of drip irrigation or soaker hoses for gardens and ,. shrubs is an ideal way of applying water directly to the plants roots,which reduces illt7 ;. ,,,,. aste from evaporation or runoff.Make every drop count,check your irrigation sys- 'I' - - tem regularly to make sure it provides the right amount of water at the right place and .IIli right time.Also be sure to check for leaks and broken sprinkler heads on a regular ba- ', ,� ,, — _ sis.If a leak or a problem is discovered with the sprinkler system,then repair it as soon .4. r“.-. '.-.4, as possible to reduce further water losses. 4 ra Water only what needs watering.Driveways,sidewalks and streets don't need water- 4* j. _ ,Ping;you can clean these concrete areas with a broom.Also wash your car with a bucket +, and a shut off nozzle on your hose.Don't let water run down the street. Place mulch aro ,d trees,shrubs and plants.Mulches discourage evaporation,weed Did you know that you growth and -,4 Mulches can be organic(aged manure,compost,bark chips or ,: wood .r ,:anic(rock and gravel).Organic mulches increase the soil's ability can save money and .L,';-; to :,•sz, , ater,h r event weeds and reduce soil erosion.Inorganic mulches absorb water by• ' ' •hea .., the sun and can actually increase water loss from plants and .144 k 0 Thinking about how you dak'""x • s�+- � '-f.._! �`'t` -,�V-' g a new landscape,match plants with use zones and watering zones. ?, ' „,ti,. ,”: '..e typical usage zones in your landscape design. @ Using less wheneve i tf Here are some wise if meq, $..1 "� _ ' blic areas are highly visible areas such as the entry to your home.This area you can use to cut yo "i''a '�' y `: receives the most care and also often uses the most water. usage,reduce your wat: t "� maintain an attractive lane : - Private areas are areas where most outdoor activities take place.This area should be functional as well as attractive and durable.It also should be designed to use less nue Water early or water late.Less water water than your public area. is wasted to the wind and evaporation when you water this "1*Service areas are the working or utility areas of the landscape which are usually screened from view(garbage can,dog house,or air conditioning unit).This area way. requires the least amount of water of the three areas. "1"1 Water deep,water infrequently, water slowly and evenly.This will As well as dividing your landscape into these typical use zones there are also corre- encourage healthy root systems that sponding water zones. develop deeper into the ground "*High watering zones are the small,visible,highly maintained areas that are rather than near the surface where considered public areas. they are more likely to become dry. 1*Moderate watering zones are private areas which in addition to natural rainfall Established lawns need only about 1 require occasional watering to maintain healthy plants. inch of water per week.Watering thor- , , oughly,but infrequently,produces a "1*Low watering zones are service areas that require only natural rainfall. leep-rooted Iawn that is more water-effi- Remember,match plants with use zones and water zones,and keep plants with similar cient and drought-tolerant. water needs together. • Water, water Have you been considering a new lawn? The water we drink and use daily is Did you know that during the summer you can use up to two times more water than often taken for granted.If we consider during the winter,just by watering your lawn?If you are considering a new lawn for the process involved between the time your yard,or just wanting to re-seed an established lawn,then understanding the dif- water is pulled from its source until we ferent types of grasses can help you have a green,healthy,and water-efficient lawn. open our faucets,we can better under- stand the costs involved.Water The following list is of the types of grass,in order of their drought-resistance,that that is taken from a well or a lo- are available in our area. cal river,is made potable444 Tall Fescue:This is a relatively new grails for planting in the Metro area.It through a treatment facility,and is quite drought tolerant and can often go withorlt water ten(10)days or theno it pi pis ngo beforeto miles 4t longer if the grass is irrigated slowly and deeply when iG is watered.It has the through piping it reaches deepest root system and will stay g1eener longertd'urir g, a drought. our businesses and homes. j # "' (' Perennial Ryegrass:This is the most common15,planted grass in western Historically,the City of Tigard and Oregon.Turf experts recommend perennial ryegrass most often as'it is easy to es- the surrounding areas served by the Ti tablish and forms an attractive turf for most of the year.Peennial ryegrass is quite dis- 1 , Bard area water district have relied on ease-resistant with proper maintenance.It does well in light to moderate shade,but water from other cities.We have pur does not do well in deep shade or poor soil. '• ' chased their surplus water.Unfortu- nately,due to 20 years of growth in the Fine Fescue:These grasses are fairly drought-tolerant,but need more frequent wa,,, • metropolitan area as well as additional tering than perennial ryegrass.It loses its beauty after drought conditions.They are federal regulations for higher water qual- best used in the shade and partially shaded areas under low maintenance and high cut ity,we are now experiencing a water length.Fine fescues are moderately disease-resistant. i shortage in the Portland metropolitan BentgrasS:This is the mosf`dc#ninant grass in the area.Bentgrass is usually an"in- area. ..vader grass."It will takeiver everJhebest maintained lawns planted with other seed E The City of Tigard must look for and types after a few yfarsi it can be easi.l identified in early morning when the dew hangs find a source for its water for the next 20 on the grass.It dorrainates other'la • g�'asset `because it grows well in the cool times of ._ years.There are numerous options avail- the year,tolerates drought by going dormant,requires very little fertilizer,and gets able,all of which have a financial impact few diseases if it is not over'ferl)llized„_ " s on our monthly water bill. "' Y Kentucky Bluegrass:This grass does dot do well in this areakIt is poorly adapted The City Council and staff will contrib- to wet and mild winters. rl , ute many hours in an effort to locate the Rough Stalk Bluegrass:A grass for wet and shay,areas only.This grass creates a most cost effective source of water for very soft,succulent,dense mat.If planted in other areas ittan be a very invasive weed the citizens and businesses of Tigard. species. As the Council gets closer to identifying Other Options:An"ecolawn"is an alternate to conventional grass lawns.Ecolawns that source,we will continue to commu- combine grasses with selected broad-leaf plants to produce an ecologically stable mix- nicate with the citizens of Tigard by pro ture of plants that require less maintenance than a typical lawn.Often these mixes take viding current information about our at least two seasons to become established.Check with your local nursery for turf spe- decisions. cialist for a mix you would enjoy. Cross talk As the temperature increases and the ply system carrying domestic water and the City of Tigard requires that all back- rainfall begins to decrease,many of us hoses or piping systems used or in- flow prevention devices be tested on an will begin to use our lawn irrigation sys- tended for some other purpose.Because annual basis. tems.Lawn irrigation systems,when in- of the possibility for contaminated water If you should have any questions regard- stalled properly,will include a backflow or water of questionable quality entering ing the installation'ol=testing of backflow prevention device.Backflow prevention into the irrigation system,all users of the prevention devices on your property, devices are our only line of defense from public water system are required to in- please call our Water Quality Technician potential or actual cross connections to stall backflow devices on their irrigation at 639-4171.Also,as a reminder,plumb the public potable water system. systems.A backflow device prevents the ing permits do need to be issued on all flow of water back into the public water Cross connections,actual or potential, new installations of lawn irrigation sys- system.are connections between the water sup- The Oregon Health Division and tems. • Did you know that you can save money and water by:• 1) Thinking about how you use water. The use of drip irrigation or soaker hoses Using less whenever possible. for gardens and shrubs applies water di- 2) redly to the plants roots,which reduces Here are some wise watering tips that you waste from evaporation or runoff.Make can use to cut your summer water usage, re- every drop count, check your irrigation sys- duce your water bill and still maintain an at- tem regularly to make sure it provides the tractive landscape. right amount of water at the right place and right time. Make sure sprinkler heads deliver water close to the ground.This helps prevent water loss to evaporation.Speaking of sprin- Water early or water late.Less water is kler systems,be sure to check for leaks and broken sprinkler heads on a regular basis. If wasted to the wind and evaporation a leak or a problem is discovered with the when you water this way. sprinkler system, then repair it as soon as tt Water deep,water infrequently.This possible to reduce further water losses. will encourage healthy root systems that Water only what needs watering.Drive- develop deeper into the ground rather ways, sidewalks and streets don't need wa- than near the surface where they are tering;you can clean these concrete areas more likely to become dry. Also,most with a broom. Also wash your car with a water applied never reaches the plants' bucket and a shut off nozzle on your hose. roots,so it is not absorbed. Water runs off Don't let water run down the street. if it is applied faster than it can be absorbed by the soil, so water slowly and Place mulch around trees, shrubs and evenly. plants.Mulches discourage evaporation, weed growth and erosion.Mulches can be Established lawns need only about 1 inch of organic (aged manure, compost,bark chips water per week.Generally, 1 inch of water or wood chips) or inorganic (rock and will moisten soil 6 inches in depth.Water- gravel).Organic mulches increase the soil,s ing ability to store water.Inorganic mulches ab- thoroughly,but infre- sorb and re-radiate heat quently,produces a Or" from the sun and can actu- deep-rooted lawn that is ally increase water loss more water-efficient and from plants and soil. drought-tolerant. Organic mulches cover and cool the soil, house, or air conditioning unit).This area minimizing evaporation.They also help pre- requires the least amount of water of the vent weeds and reduce soil erosion. three areas. When designing a new land- As well as dividing your land- scape,match plants with use scape into these typical use zones zones and watering zones.Con- there are also corresponding sider these typical usage zones in water zones. your landscape design. \'� i .;� 0 High watering zones are the tt Public areas are highly visible ►r small, visible, highly y} areas such as the entry to your maintained areas that are home.This area receives the � 411r considered public areas. most care and also often uses the most water. tt Moderate watering zones are private areas which in addition to natural tt Private areas are areas where most rainfall require occasional watering to outdoor activities take place.This area maintain healthy plants. should be functional as well as attractive and durable. It also should be designed to IX Low watering zones are service areas that use less water than your public area. require only natural rainfall. TI Service areas are the working or utility Remember,match plants with use zones areas of the landscape which are usually and water zones, and keep plants with simi- screened from view (garbage can, dog lar water needs together. These summer watering tips and conservation ideas are provided by the City of Tigard, your water service provider. iLe_JD April 18, 1995 Jack Polans 16000 S.W. Queen Victoria P1. King City, Oregon 972211 Alice L,. Schlenker, Mayor and lake Oswego Council Members Post Office Box 369 lake Oswego, OR 970311 1. I am reading from a public document on The Tigard Water District Board Of Commissioners Regular Meeting Agenda -- Serving the Unincorporated Area People, dated Wednesday March 29, 1995 MINUTFS at 7:00 p.m., and concerning pages 3 & 11, of number 7-b as follows: Director's Report by Ed Wegner, City of Tigard, who states, in effect, that the Agreement will assign The Water Rights to a new agency (named differently than The City of Tigard) for an estimated tit Million gpd, this is Phase 1 of the process. Phase 2 is the composition of the board (lake Oswego' wants a 3 to 2 composition; and Tigard wants 2-2-1 which is simu- lar to the composition of our other boards), operating procedures, responsibility for leading the operations, and establishing technical committees so staff can communicate directly with specific people. 2. The following, as a writer in the public's best interest (for the past four (4)) years in the State of Oregon) is information that I have obtained: Under The Intergovernmental Oswego/Tigard possil4e Contract: Oswego (who now owns The Water Right); wants a 3-voting rights to 2 of Tigard's votes. Tigard wants a 2-member voting of each 2: cities, and then both cities seek a fifth member to vote -- thus the 2-2-1 composition. 3. Further: Both parties are in agreement to place the Water Rights into a new Agency in case of one or both cities exercise the contract by wanting out-75T the contract. • b. Further: The New "Agency," much like a shell corporate structure will have a limited authority in acting for the two cities by establishing its own paid staff to act out the many Phases needed such as minutes & reports, the wholesale water supply "Agency" costs of service & retails, the use of the full water rights on the c lactamas river, the future possible act &/or taking over the place of-the Intergovernmental Water Board (IWB) and its responsibilities, and or any toner use- ful act that the Oswego/Tigard agree upon, under the Laws of The State Of Oregon. 5. Further: The Intergovernmental Agreement between The City of lake Oswego and The City of Tigard can be cancelled by one or both parties and when carried out, the "Agency" shell will end and any new contract may permit lake Oswego to get back their Water Rights, and City of Tigard receive their fair share to continue under its new contract - - of which both cities abiding under the Laws of The State of Oregon. 6. Further: Any water bond issues may be acted upon by the two-cities possibly us- ing their revenue sale of water or going for other water bond issues via taxes, etc. Also, water bond issue may run from 5'4 to 8% with tax-examption. Also, the possible Regional or Sub-Regional water supply will be needed by the two- cities for future use. loft continued: Jack Polans to lake Oswego Mayor & Council Members -- dated April 18) 1995 7. Further: If the Oswego/Tigard Contract is finalized, it appears to me that with- out legal Conditions entered into the said ContractiThe Intergovernmental Water Agreement (IGA) of City of Tigard, City of ling City, City of Durham and the Un- incorporated-people will not be able to complain of any disagreement they all may or may not have against the legal Wording of the possible Intergovernmental Oswego -Tigard Agreement, other thin possible court action. THEREFORE: legal Conditions may be setforth as Tigard City Administrator1Bill Monahan, said to me several Months back when I did asked him the question, "What will be the Legal Relationship be- tween The IGA and The Intergovernmental Oswego/Tigard Agreement In .Monahan answer- ed, conditions may have to be place4into The Oswego/Tigard Agreement. 8. Further: Also, it appears to me that both The Intergovernmental Water Board and The TWD Commissioners' Board may or may not any longer be useful to the possible future Oswego/Tigard Agreement. 9. Further: People I have spoken to (both layman and profissional) suggest that the FIFTH person under the Oswego/Tigard Contract Agreement be an independent water- knowledgeable person. /0, Further: As a writer in the public's best interest for the past four years, I will try to answer any questions by the Mayor and Council Members. Jack Polans copies: lake Oswego Mayor . +� " " Council ,kembers Tigard City Adminisirator, Bill Monahan Z' of 2 PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION 800 NE OREGON ST #16 ( STE 540 ) PORTLAND, OR 97232-TEL : 731-4093 NOTIFICATION OF BOUNDARY CHANGE PROPOSAL DATE : April 3, 1995 TO : Tigard Water District ATTN : Board of Directors The Boundary Commission has received a proposal (No. 3459 ) to annex certain territory to the City of Tigard. The area involved is shown on the attached map. Basic information on this proposal is as follows : Area : 10. 07 acres Existing Land Use: Single family dwellings 1 Multi-family units 0 Commercial structures 0 Industrial structures 0 Other -- Total Estimated Population : 4 Current Assessed Value : $131, 640. 00 Current Zoning : County R-6 Reason For Annexation : Applicants wish to receive City services to facilitate development. Proposed Development : Forty single-family residences. If you wish to make written comments or recommendations, please present a letter to this office no later than April 24, 1995, or attend the Public Hearing on the above matter, to be held on Thursday, May 4, 1995 at 7 : 00 p.m. in Room 602, Multnomah County Courthouse, 1021 SW 4th Ave. , Portland , Oregon. Kenneth S. Martin Executive Officer KSM/dw enc . 1 4••••••1110111.11•1••••••••11t___ - ••- PROPOSAL NO . 3459 SE1/4 NW1/4 SECTION 3 T2S R1W W2S 1 3BD Washington County Scale: 1" = 250' ••••••••:•:•:if...0.:,_ - ••••sci.O.:::::-'1.*•••"" ••••• ....... • ••••••• :•:•:•: — -— t " •:•:•-.. -- s,14 .--- __,...,.. ... ;..... ......,ut 1 .„..,.., .••• ,.. -• :•:•.-... vi Au- ••• --.• ••••••• :•:•:•: :e7 .., . i ...• .„,. . •-• ',1-z. 1 ' .- „ .: i --•-• • : -,, 4 -- 1-6,--i,z. ,.. , go 1 • ! • .... •••• -......• ....... • ...:•.:••• F. .....:.•:• C. . ::::::: ...,... :•:•::: \ ....... '- .•. :::::::_ :•.•:•: TIGARD I ----1 ; I so* • z," • t , 1 . il. ..:... 30. ! ..' I S; .t: •:::•.• ......• :•:•.:`,. ... V>: ..t , .........! •1 ..... ....... e,....t....,.......:jil.,...p..1..f.._......,,..i....,..-',..1......7•77- i ' I: •:::::: .......... "' ' '. , ........ •,......, ...•••. •.•::,..: ---- :. •,-' . ..•.,.. ••• il . • . . _ .,. • 1.: , •" :::::::: „.. ..., ••••-• :•5:• •-• .:•):• .,. .,,,, .::•.-.-: ?I '7. ,ci.':. .„0_x_v_____::_o_wrL:____._____r__.-----",---i '...:" ...::::•:::•:: AREA TO BE ::.:•:.:-:-: t w . 1300 .... -1.;,;° •. -.,••1•::::: ANNEXED :::: ) > I = ,—, ,,, .0 ;F :::•:.: _., •- , ‘50° ::: 3.a141:0s. y"t"-.—P-TL—IAPCP—EE 'R'',..-:.X1i.,‘.•,..'•I• .....,...,.-.-.•...._It..C.....o..,....,..1:'..1V.,.: -,:-0,a: .:.u'C‘a• i•fi.,:t;':.::. -.".-'-•3.i:.•r7:::•i'-:'. -/--,-,..:.:-..,!;:1.,...--;T`r.•,,;t.:,se "-.'.,,s :I1,iIfi•-,::.:t••:,:•:: :.,:•r::.:::::::•::.:.:::.:...r-:.i.:3.: _78 =k - A ...i•.f:...i::..:i:.:..:..".::i.fi:.:... 2SE5 E 1 .2...aCt. ... - . - . -• - — -,7 -,: :, -,:-:-..- .t w CARMEN ,..•.:::, STREET c,‘,•;.:::: r::::::: ••• "*. :•:•:- -.-.•-• ...-.• ... . i-•:•:•:•: — • 3003 zroo 1 zsco 27 -:•:•:- ........ •...:::: i I , :r.:•:-: . ...-.. . r; ' i:; Z rr ' .": - ! ' .: ' ;, . r: r .-..--...:•:•:•: :O..1-••••Ir.V.:-...7,1"...-.............:-.1-.n........i-7:%::`_.i ‘,,,,....--,,,,,,,,.....--: „,,.. -i•.•;,;,,:,, . , .... . .,,- :.$ 233C• ,d'..1 ! ,_.-_-.---:-..-•-•.- . ,C* L SSE S S• 'I, P.01.05C5 C,. r . I DC NOT REL. - •2 •• i§li ' ' :: ; 1,OR thrt r••••- '' '6'- ! : ••••14 , ,....._.. - •' `.4 I . • . I: ' ' 1 Z - ; ,) 71 i t •-•. 1 • •or•...• . .• :330 3100 1,30 : 1302 .. • r eV:. • •-4, ••. ! :sc.- ..1•',e. 4. . ..:.. , ‘1;..:: ; 4 IC: I. S•.: 1 ':. :"' I : ''" ' .. ....... , \ . ••• • .i ". : ; I 1 ' ... : .. •• ...8 .• „ _..... I SW ••,..• ... ;1 ,-FONNER _ 7.. STREET %, as I PROPOSAL NO. 3459 CITY OF TIGARD ANNEXATION FIGURE 2 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT INCOME STA 1'bMENT & BALANCE SHEET As of March 31, 1995 INCOME STATEMENT Accounts I J Prior Y-T -D I Monthly Y -T - D REVENUES 1%PY Water Sales Revenue Interest Earned 726.51 130.23 856.74 Recovered Expenditures Total Revenues 726.51 130.23 856.74 EXPENDITURES Professional Services 323.45 323.45 Contractual Services Office Supplies& Expenses Advertising & Elections Dues & Subscriptions 3,326.00 3,326.00 Insurance 2,441.05 2,441.05 Total Expenditures 6,090.50 6,090.50 BALANCE SHEET ASSETS Cash& Investments 25,305.57 130.23 25,435.80 Net Fixed Assets Total Assets 25,305.57 130.23 25,435.80 LIABILITIES & FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts Payable Due Other Funds Total Liabilities Fund Balance Fund Balance 30,669.56 ' _- 30,669.56 Excess of Revenues/(Expenditures) (5,363.99) 130.23 (5,233.76) Total Fund Balance 25,305.57 130.23 25,435.80 Total Liabilities and Fund Balance 25,305.57 130.23 25,435.80 g:\Excel\TWD\Monthly\94-5isbs.xls MARCH 1995 WATER MONTHLY REPORT Revenues/Expenditures: Month of March Year to Date Prior Yr. to Date % of Budget Revenues: Water Sales $301,117.48 $3,112,059.88 $2,596,017.16 Meter Sales 50,970.00 346,105.00 386,485.93 Developer Fees 0.00 $131,166.68 64,437.43 Other Income 7,109.30 103,584.18 89,532.50 Total Revenue $264,604.10 $3,692,915.74 $3,136,473.02 97% Expenditures: Personal Services $55,486.16 $533,429.88 $624,484.27 Material Services 126,297.04 1,272,019.22 1,267,282.84 Capital Outlay 13,456.23 117,966.16 182,738.65 Cap. Proj. Res. Fund 00.00 00.00 300,000.00 *Total Expends. $195,239.43 $1,923,415.26 $2,374,505.76 52% SDC Fund: $55,095.39 $410,544.51 518,414.44 104% SDC Fund Balance: $1,497,609.27 * City accounting system is on a cash basis Meter Installations: 5/8" x 3/4" 1" 1 1/2" 2" Total Durham 10 0 0 0 10 King City 0 0 0 0 0 Unincorporated Area 35 0 0 0 35 City of Tigard 33 2 1 0 36 Total for March 81 Water Consumption and Loss: Total 100 cubic feet of water purchased or produced - 169,980 ccf Plus amount of water from storage during March and consumption not billed in February 20,150 ccf Total 100 cubic feet of water billed <148,719 ccf> Water loss from flushing new lines in subdivisions < 1,690 ccf> Net amount of water in storage < 9,500 ccf> Amount of water consumed but not yet billed < 15.650 ccf> *Total Water loss 14,571 ccf 8.57% * Includes water loss due to cleaning of the 10 MG reservoir Work Accomplished: Durham • Water Division personnel responded to a few routine requests to check for water leaks or low water pressure at the customer's service. • Water Division personnel replaced a damaged angle stop on SW Ellman Lane. King City • Water Division personnel responded to five requests to check for low or no water consumption. Unincorporated Area • Water Division personnel replaced three 5/8" x 3/4" water meters; two 3/4- inch pressure regulators; adjusted two 3/4-inch water services; and responded to ten requests to check water leaks at the meter, low water usage, and low pressure problems. • Water Division personnel relocated a fire hydrant further south from the street on SW Beef Bend Road just east of SW 131st Avenue. Area residents were concerned that the existing location was a vehicle hazard. City of Tigard • Water Division personnel replaced two 3/4-inch pressure regulators and five 5/8" x 3/4" water meters that were malfunctioning. In addition Water staff also responded to 13 calls to check on water leaks at the meter, replace damaged meter boxes or checked reports of low water pressure. • Water Division personnel potholed SW Durham Road in various locations to determine the location and depth of the 12-inch water main in relationship to storm sewer crossings, power pole locations, and catch basins. Washington County has plans for a road improvement project that includes three lanes, bike path, sidewalks, and the widening of the Fanno Creek bridge. • Water Division personnel installed 14 3/4-inch water services for Pebble Creek Estates, a single family residential development located on SW Scholls Ferry Road north of SW Walnut Street. • Water Division personnel installed 40 3/4-inch water services and two 1- inch water services for Hillshire Summit Estates No. 2, a single family- residential development located at the summit of Bull Mountain, east of SW Benchview Terrace. • Water Division personnel repaired a fire hydrant that was damaged by a unknown vehicle along SW Greenburg Road. • Water Division personnel relocated a fire hydrant Iocated in the Aspen Ridge development that was to close to the wheel chair ramp of the sidewalk. • Water Division personnel relocated a fire hydrant, installed a 2-inch water service and installed a 1 1/2-inch water meter for the new American Legion Hall located on SW Scoffins Street at SW Ash Avenue. • Water Division personnel updated a meter vault to comply with confined space entry requirements and also replaced the 3-inch compound meter for the Englewood Apartment complex off of SW Springwood Drive. Operational Changes: The Utility Division continued its efforts in cross training employees from the water, sanitary sewer, and storm water crews. The 10 million gallon reservoir was drained and cleaned during the month of March. Status Report: During the routine cleaning of the 10 million gallon reservoir, a separation between the concrete wall and the curbing inside of the reservoir was noted. Upon further examination the separation was the result from the Scotts Mill, "spring break quake", earthquake from 1993. Other than the separation, there was no structural damage to the reservoir and no leaks were discovered. Repairs to the reservoir, sealing of the separation, is scheduled for April. The reservoir will be back in service before May 15, 1995. "ic-(444A-4-1A1- 312 s/ys- :--;w -2PARTICIPANTS comm TTEE s . . .got � . - i' '"'" GIONAL VATER SUPPE'`Y0 '.RASE 'PRIJGRESS March 28, 1995 Since the last meeting of the Participants Committee on February 21, 1995 the Project Management Staff have been involved in the following activities: 1) Staff have met with consultants about the public involvement program and the institutional element to discuss the process from now till the issuance of the Preliminary Plan in July. A meeting of the public involvement subcommittee will be set up prior to the next steering committee. 2)Staff have met with BCI staff to discuss the conservation program report and the review process for the Conservation Coalition and the Steering Committee to review that document. 3)Staff attended a meeting at WRD in Salem on the budget issues regarding the state funded share of a Corps reauthorization study for the Willamette projects on February 23. WRD staff will present an alternative for the participants to review for presentation to the legislative subcommittee responsible for reviewing the WRD budget. The ideas discussed ways to reduce this biennium share including such things moving to a four year time span, when the actual start date would be,and if other local match shares could be generated. A fair amount of time was spent discussing the potential opposition of the agricultural community to having a reauthorization feasibility study conducted at all. 4)Staff reviewed the Columbia River National Estuary Program nomination agreement. Contact DEQ staff to suggest that the discussion of beneficial uses note that the Columbia is under study as a potential municipal supply source for the Portland metropolitan region. 5) Staff made a presentation to the Water Services Leadership Group meeting on March 6 about the outcomes for the Phase 2 process and the public involvement process. 6)Staff attended the Metro WRPAC subcommittee on Water Resources and Open Spaces meeting on March 8. The Metro work program for refining the Metro 2040 growth management decision was outlined and this group provided input on the refinement of the unbuildable lands inventory and discussed the type of recommendations that might be made about adequate standards for providing adequate water management inside the UGB. 7)Staff met with three members of the Denver Water Department to discuss with them the 1RP process and desired outcomes of the RWSP for our region and how this compared with the situation in Denver. 8)Staff attended the Metro MTAC meeting on March 9 and received information on the refinement of the population forecasts that Metro is conducting at this time. The major point is that the area has grown faster than prior predictions since 1990 and this has resulted in less land supply left inside the current UGB than was anticipated. The More detailed Metro 2015 population forecasts are being developed now and will likely reflect these faster growth rates. 9)Staff has coordinated the printing and distribution of the conservation program to the Col/Willamette Conservation Coalition. • VISITORS PLEASE REGISTER Date: .29-95 Meeting: 7?iJl) /6'd�� // Name (please print) Do you wish to speak? (yes or no) 1 ,:rikA PO( A'°‘ --S 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.