City Council Packet - 02/04/2020City of Tigard
Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda
TIGARD
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL&TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY*Agenda Revised
2/4/2020 to include a discussion on a Local Option Levy Measure Explanatory Statement as Agenda
Item No. 6.
MEETING DATE AND TIME:February 4,2020- 6:30 p.m. Business Meeting
MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is
available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Public Comment items are
asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor
or the City Manager.
Times noted are estimated;it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 6:15 p.m. to
sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet. Business agenda items can be heard in any order after 6:30 p.m.
Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for
Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 503-718-2419, (voice) or
503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services:
Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and
Qualified bilingual interpreters.
Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead
time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by
calling: 503-718-2419 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf).
SEE ATTACHED AGENDA
VIEW LIVE VIDEO STREAMING ONLINE:
htto://www.tigard-or.gov/city hall/council meeting.oho
CABLE VIEWERS:The first City Council meeting of the month may be shown live on Channel 28 at 6:30
p.m.The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28:
Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m.
Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m.
lig II City of'Tigard
Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda
TIGARD r'
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL &TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY *Agenda Revised
2/4/2020 to include a discussion on a Local Option Levy Measure Explanatory Statement as Agenda
Item No. 6.
MEETING DATE AND TIME:February 4,2020- 6:30 p.m. Business Meeting
MEETING LOCATION: City of Tigard -Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223
1. BUSINESS MEETING
A.Call to Order
B.Roll Call
C.Pledge of Allegiance
D.Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items
2. PUBLIC COMMENT (Two Minutes or Less,Please)
A.Follow-up to Previous Public Comment
B.Public Comment—Sign Up Sheet
3. TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD/TOWN CENTER ADVISORY
COMMISSION JOINT MEETING 6:35 p.m. estimated time
4. TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY-RECEIVE UPDATE ON SENIOR
CEN[ER AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT 7:15 p.m. estimated time
5. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF ARTWORK TO BE PLACED
ON THE HIGHWAY 99W SUPPORT STRUCTURE AS PART OF TIGARD'S OU[DOOR
MUSEUM 7:30 p.m. estimated time
6. DISCUSSION ON LOCAL OPTION LEVY EXPLANATORY STATEMENT 7:35 p.m.
estimated time
7. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
8. NON AGENDA ITEMS
9. EXECUTIVE SESSION:The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss real
property transaction negotiations under ORS 192.660(2)(e).All discussions are confidential and
those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are
allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any
information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action
or making any final decision. 7:55 p.m. estimated time
10. ADJOURNMENT 8:10 p.m. estimated time
AGENDA ITEM 2. February 4, 2020
q
PUBLIC COMMENT
C
Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
T I G A RD The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda but asks that you
first try to resolve your concerns through staff.
This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meetings and records laws. All
written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and cities ofpersons who attend or
participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record.
Name: `', j U '-' S `9 1^/"*"- City of Residence: y'-e,
Phonetic Pronunciation: L i` k @ 1+ co S
Topic: 7.4.4-4 5 , i Q- oto s ertyr4._.
Staff Contact(s) -Required
Optional-
Ifyou'd like staff to be able to contact you about your topic,please provide at least one way to contact you.
Email: Phone:
Address: City/State/Zip:
me: til I'vr) City of Residence: /g-S - _
Phonetic Pronunciation: _1(,AA 50[-i iV d-> -,
Topic: - ,`,--41., all4 1/241X-el-) 11. I4ioilit4z
V
44,4'
4111
Staff Contact(s) -Required
Optional-
Ifyou'd like staff to be able to contact you about your topic,please provide at least one way to contact you.
Email: Phone:
Address: City/State/Zip:
Page 1
AGENDA ITEM 2. February 4, 2020
PUBLIC COMMENT
Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meetings and records laws. All
written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and cities ofpersons who attend or
participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record.
Name: D A t1 k c Q ( U l e S 0--City of Residence: I ( Q A L--k:›
honetic Pronunciation:
a
17‘
Topic: 1--,.C1c ,L) - .1-----:y‘ r- 6 AA.C_. Se iA 1 L' .-' t:LS ( n
Staff Contact(s) -Required 4 r ,;i c I--'"-
Optional—
Ifyou'd like staff to be able to contact you about your topic,please provide at least one way to contact you.
e
Email: CA ' -1-4.1C . Phone: (U 2-0 l }-Z
Address: City/State/Zip:
Name: i O c GJ 0 fl f/' City of Residence: --fir rs4
Phonetic Pronunciation:
r
Topic: Fe LL) Wit'c o 6.ii l o - 41/911
Staff Contact(s) -Required.
Optional—
Ifyou'd like staff to be able to contact you about your topic,please provide at least one way to contact you.
Email: Phone:
Address: City/State/Zip:
Page 2
AGENDA ITEM 2. February 4, 2020
PUBLIC COMMENT
Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meetings and records laws. All
written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and cities of persons who attend or
participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record
Name: ` (,,I 2 740 r \ Cl( \ City of Residence: 1 t c c1.
Phonetic Pronunciation:
Topic: c, :
r"
Staff Contact(s) —Required
Optional—
Ifyou'd like staff to be able to contact you about your topic,please provide at least one way to contact you.
Email: 3 C0 '2 Phone:
Address: City/State/Zip:
Name: 1111nr i.1 "rn- City of Residence: 1
Phonetic Pronuncia on:
Topic:
Staff Contact(s)—Required
Optional—
Ifyou'd like staff to be able to contact you about your topic,please provide at least one way to contact you.
Email: Phone:
Address: City/State/Zip:
Page 3
AGENDA ITEM 2. February 4, 2020
PUBLIC COMMENT
Limited to 2 minutes or less, please)
This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meetings and records laws. All
written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and cities of persons who attend or
participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record
i' k-)t)‘1\
ame: \\r City of Residence: c ClorA
144
117 Phonetic Pronunciation:
Topic:
Staff Contact(s) — Required
Optional—
Ifyou'd like staff to be able to contact you about your topic,please provide at least one way to contact you.
Email: Phone:
Address: City/State/Zip:
Name: City of Residence: _
Phonetic Pronunciation:
Topic:
Staff Contact(s) —Required
Optional—
Ifyou'd like staff to be able to contact you about your topic,please provide at least one way to contact you.
Email: Phone:
Address: City/State/Zip:
Page 4
SUPPLEMENTAL PACKETFOR „a:2-August 0 218, 2019
DATE OF MEETING)
John and Lois Otting
8885 SW O'Mara Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223
503 319 5046
Ec,OPY
Schuyler Warren
13125 Hall Street
Tigard, OR 97223
Re: Notice of Land Use Application dated August 12, 2019
Tigard Senior Center Affordable Housing Lot Validation
8815 SW O'Mara Street, Tigard, Oregon 97223
Dear Mr. Warren:
We have lived at the above address for 42 years and we are opposing this
validation request for the same and additional reasons we opposed the earlier
proposal to build multi story public housing on the site where the Tigard Senior
Center now rests. Logic, common sense and a spirit of community brought those
plans to a halt. May the same occur with this proposal.
THE BUILDING OF THIS SENIOR HOUSING WILL BOTH DEMINISH AND
COMPROMISE THE QUALITY OF THE EXISTING SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER.
Somewhere in the promotional material promoting the building of this housing it
is stated that one of the advantages is that is immediately adjacent, if not actually
attached, to the senior center. This implies what is probably true. The residents
will occupy the center as their living room. All others, over time, will be visitors.
The center currently brings together seniors from all over the community. Some
come with great effort. But all those that come make an effort because they want
to be there. This creates a certain spirit of community. And while we have not
visited the center in the last five Years (At one time we had a key), the last few
times we were there, there were enough seniors present to make the main floor
seem crowded. And presently, on most days, we see few, if any, vacate parking
places so we do not believe the center is no less popular. Can the center easily
and graciously accommodate these new residents and still maintain a quality
experience for the other senior citizens of Tigard?
PARKING. This was an issue when this site was being considered for low income
housing back in the late 70s. And it is just as relevant day. Where are the
residents going to park their cars? We estimate that twelve parking places will be
eliminated if the five story structure is built. Our drive through estimate is that
this will leave thirty-seven which most every day are now all occupied. Unless it is
made a condition of residency not to have a motor vehicle, many of these low
income residents will come with a car. From my own knowledge and
conversation with others, it is a mistaken assumption to believe just because you
are low income you do not have a car. We are just as certain there will not be
fifty-six cars as we are there will not be zero. But even one permanent vehicle is
too much for the spaces now available. We equally believe it is shabby planning to
rely on the generosity of others, the Tigard Christian Church, to provide everyday
parking which should be provided on site. And it can be a long, hard walk up and
down the slope to the parking lot at the church for many seniors. Parking, which
is now just a problem, will become a major problem if this housing is built.
THE STRUCTURE, FANNO CREEK, AND THE WETLANDS. The five story building
will stand out like an extended middle finger, a cancer in a quiet residential
neighborhood which in this era of political correctness we are supposed to
accept, but which some of us do not accept, particularly when it is our
neighborhood. Would you want this structure in your neighborhood? This a
totally inappropriate structure for this location. It also appears from the drawings
that certain well used paths behind the senior center and down from the parking
lot to the park will be either changed or eliminated. And we noted this date that
several tall, beautiful trees on the edge of Fanno Creek Park have apparently been
marked for destruction. This infringement into the park seems in direct
contradiction to stated city policy to create and maintain a natural area. And
because of the building's location, has there been an environmental study as to
its effect on the wetlands? If so, I would like a copy of the environmental study.
FLOODING. Due to the allotted time I have not had an opportunity to check
floodplain maps and document flooding on Fanno Creek. But we, our children and
persons with whom we have spoken have witnessed flooding at the location of
the proposed building site three times, if not more, during the past forty-two
years.
CREATING A GHETTO. Back in the late 1970's, when the site where the senior
center now stands was being proposed for low cost or subsidized housing, I recall
some proponent remarking the site was out of sight and rather isolated and an
excellent location to house the poor. And this comes to mind when I think of this
location today. I, John, am eighty-three. And if I should ever go into any type of
senior living I would want green lawns, flowers, people running or walking by my
window, children playing, traffic in the street and public transit half a block away.
The senior center is perfectly located for daytime activities. But to be there
twenty-fours hours a day? There is little green lawn, but lots of asphalt. And little
live activity by your window. The location is one of isolation. If the city wants to
create affordable senior housing, they should find a more friendly location.
EMERGEMCY SERVICES. It is hard to determine from the drawing if emergency
vehicles, especially fire trucks, would have access to the housing structure. Has
the fire marshal, or perhaps the Tualatin Fire and Rescue, approved emergency
access to all sides of the structure in the event of fire?
Our reasons for opposition are simply stated and need not be summarized. I am
always interested in who is profiting financially in these situations and I may be
contacting you at a later time for additional information.
Thank you for your kind consideration.
John Otting
Lois Otting
I
c.:f
C d O t6 v C
to ba 'c a
15
a 0. O. a+ , ? c O} E vii' '11N t .;.
i..
t•.. 1 ..
D i a arc ti
Ca OtO 0Q! • w
in a 0
1p
j n
Qt a' 3 C . C v to
t!) i u" a 1,4
a ... a 3 a t0 O r f?
L. V O
ate.
i C v Q'
1 `,
O -
a •c -c .0 a t O v s
tikc .5
a -0U • ` u 3 °al i 3
L M .t'0 O ca c c u nO ° m r nyvn_
O aO ° c t- y
co
tu u a a, a 30 x__t Rs N
r.t..) c
c 2 b '—' " U t- - st r---
4.4
52 a a
a 3V `y S O v a„ ir u t6 tin L
A
Cy° ° a m a i
V^
M NO
1a% ,
0 i_ r
o tt 3 I ,ri, F-
fl! C C
13 aa
ce m a. C4 C a a a) t m
0 ,N
ate+
O
d
c
to O 0 C.? 0 O V O
va O vi 4. i
c a c Q = > 3 a if)) r/
u-) co E /3 -a 3 I 1-7 ( Va
s
tn.
c ` u Ja
J QJ v) rvo " >. ° ° O y i°ii O *° J v fls
a ,° s i S~ 3 a v v ,0s.yh _
11.2 0
W ;" m 13 a o a a a o C s 2
4. • m x c c c .c ,0 t w o L N ` ^ ` w
O
c a r 0 C Q, C u .,v.+
N I fr itf
0
to 0 __
OJ
v> i = c vi =
3J C el.JDL, J \ ua W
0.
H fi u. 3 a) .c 'U m w > N 1...U
0 Q. c c h, c E F' 7 (0 - .y Q1.E
CJ a
a Cx '' `-
a O 7At4Q1. c h0 O O V +°. L N
c i Q a - ul
ca. •-
O . I^
t6 a 0) L l 'i`.!
itr3L
vw Ci
as '
n S1 '12 fi CJ tll i— 1
a+ SV
4
4c. # -13 C 0 -12 4-
r5
vsaj
f-
Ci C I 4-'
0
4-',
1) -
c, g, , ----/a.
ill
i ja ki > w Cal C . .0 t 'LS
4° C = = c v a 5 O E t
v illk, i
I IQJ
ua -000 ° -5a C tlki1
ts it ° `° °
vs j,
t'
ffi - n .c 3 a a 0 a 0 I o 0
T*"•
a r c u a a .0 O C ra tD
I-- o .Q A u Q 4./i F 3 h a 'c G T y
C s.. Q 'a 2o .0
c E •c 0
a) on 411)
c
LI ),,.
4.• a) ..... c
3...
ra 0 _c -- - la ra ra
w
01 E
0 13 i:--:E0c0, (0 ---„,
To CO ..0 us '.. • 43 us 13 0
0.3 t„,)
C 1.3
it
UI
0
2 a) a
Lel40• (0c 17, 2001307 '''' 4U 03 C ra Q.L. 0 '"•• )..
0 8 = to ,..... 0 a) u
44 . ii c "C$ ..z a) -c 0 a)
C 5- `§- c k., -r v 5.
cF00 - :0 — .2 0
u 'n - —
ea. -
2G.) a. -
is. s.., C.A.
0 .W 0 44 '.+1 15 03 C a'0
1- = c .... oo
C 0 (1) 0 Z. C I-4,
0) ,.. 21 -0 •.•-• DI co
V)
vo)
16.
0
u) (osta0m, t ... -0 (0 C N-. r.,.. •,
C 0. 4.0 C ...V W r5
0 4 ., 1 i (). --.."-•..) •-•-) 14., 4' ri 9,
L. ” '..' ti c ro,'"' E t to c0,t. --c —e
zincojLi ;::
1) ,
j , 0C0IA ,
1
Z1
X66' 8 ft
c, D)
1.0
031... Z.
C 42 1r
4.-
Clid % 3 r---
a.u 0 4..)C It C 10,,.
Lrstu .,:
t. c a 0 ra 13 --?. C‘Ic4 '''-- --
4sto
E wi ,10 - 0, Q., 0 (t, . in c.. ' `‘/• \n, 0 /- o i
El X 4- ci oo C In
W
V
1-
Vo .., uo ;12 4, V. ..z - ca -0 to 0 crE.) c -- >,.. si.) u.,
0- ..c c as c. In k,r)
C'r
rt^, 90 \r' \s-S' 04,/ 0 ...:i VI 131 VI 4) TS
4,a co 2a - ..., .- c x _ 2 7,7,4) as c 71 0 a, 0 aza) 0 20ECiCI- $- c "C 0- ° 0ea1- 0. fa =
12 opi 40
c
vs
I- ".• x. 1...
n
C C
lc Ct. 4•-•3 C Cl'' C14 03
a)1.-.
gt cct45D
k•A) "--- 1 7/tc _ -- a)
t., 1•11O.
i.4 0 1./3 CIc) a v 12
ig 2 6 = C 'e'
M
C 4u- ett – U .,„„ .- - us C C 0 1 H IN ' S- —' w
V)1 11
Z \
V
s,Ti \ eg Z
0.
1.....(
7)
4 03.4 0 ti;•1 Lc -- 0 00 03 4+
E.
I
4t)
L..
70 C v$• M c ...-
3 00 - .... CO tr * J, ---- ,--N-•
cV 2 Cc--• \) v.., `1'
t,u u.41
0 ..2 0 0 0.) "0 •- ‘"/ c W Z5 .0 0
ci
in OD 50 ...,
O., C0t C4-`
7E4 — .
5 3'
2 iv
0c ‘. .., • -
0 °'O. (I)
0 6' 0 - 3)
4,m 'C' -- 1-. . 0- 2, 1-2 tn N
II it 0
0
N--. .,) I
w s i
0 c o) 1..
4,3 = 03 -6-•' '''' iri S. SI a.) Po- -0 cuCZoj4.4,4/ 4) U "LC44 01 0. - a) 03 '" 0) 4) 42
0 .‘^2 'ti 4) 4.) C t *CIo .„ - -c 0 C
O. .0 v 10 w 12 g,,•/ h. 0, to
C = +3 -0 0 ,,,,i tri. . n3 1.- 0 co ..‘e. 0 c .c .e). fo .. C crok. 4 ,,k,.
a,
1
a
N P)
c "„,— >. a) 0 c - 0.) ,,,c- 4... 0 -10- - 0 0 4.4 0 it
c•.- 0 •••• -C . 4,,,i 0 C.:7•N
0
Ir. ,.= .1. 4.4 CU a, ....... ....- v, — _., 1 ^..........
r, . .... . C a) To i h•–• `—'
0 > 0 ..c 0 u OD -C -C =
1,.. .0 43 U ‹E al I..- 0.. .f, ° 12 0 clr" (7,-- (›- c't-
y Tr 1
1
i.7 cl 1 N NI c-k4.4.4.C\-
4.(c ci E-J4 I-- —4 f,1 fyi 4 Li;4 <
t t t I 1 I 1.
y
I c
i V
i
1
C
f
L pqj 3
y s k
i n I
T
I Q C
L C v 1
vt U
1 Li
nf`
yi Li
m
r* in Jam' i
C O O to
U i' a uti
S9 -T d t=- ZuZific1aCjO %j a) 3 E \D ' 0 QLy
d
o
0 L)L U lL
N S
1
v• C
N C v r.".
l c C --— O
0 _
s. t.l
ca v
u u i
J
R,
It
c <„ t
o 1 v k --
m
Q Q ° c3 N N r1
r• ,
1 • `-
I :: N cel 4
d v
z 1
Ctz
tt
F
tr 3'
7,1i
3
0 0 f 4 r. 1 1
tz c , 4.
t 4- a 1613,
1-;
D 9 ‘ ;)
3 i
i..., c it t k• -.\- e'Th vy,
0 2 g -..j A o
tri
o
un.
Hit
O
a
cr1
s7- a
c te. 4 v- 3 1'
0 I-
O
0—
o43 Q
i Q
4.0
Ca
O O = 2 V1 S.
5 titi
sZ
E r
E.
p = u s
f
1
r • t=— Z
inVIillf13
44)
a.
i CLQiC .
J` a
C 1hi
HNVill in umiii
it 3
o ON 4 II.
Sa -0 i n \ . _ d
Q c td
1.
1V\
11104.0pik\
4. .' -
40 V
L
II 4
ori. s N S 3 .\
t j11
k
t i 1{
9 t f
g g
I i 111.
LI
r O n. 3 a
d
I ,, *4
7 ,
9--- 1, \.3...) Q''';
s'
8A :\
1 '
to
C
13 :
Q `l
r.. .\ 1 .
t
Q ,
y C7 Z/! ' P
Imo`
0 40 N J
14
ti
ley
n
Gam! tJ Q
O
46
o o o c R 0
UI c Z • d J c.
s,
3 a
V
J GK
24)
tn
14.1
s° co C
c m
c ' to
7tn._
ov .,....
V SI
WO ta. -c. ta 1 , .4.,. A _.:11ocu
4:3 01
0 1 (5)? %.-- 1... '' •--'1 ' \ 41(-- ' 1-:: L' ' i
k
ION
Ian, r
ti
c--
1+
4-)
U
I ,I I I r
1 ,ii
t la 1
V t 44 1 1 1
I 12I
i 1
i, i
0.
0
1iu1
as 1 I Is. -r
t1
4;01 "0
C 'Z' 1
III
4 1 1 101 -.15 i i 1 1 I 112. 15 1 .. i I
10
t; 2
al
I I
I
1
s 1 I :
013101" ..,2
a) ,
7 :
0 '--
1-- - ‘ •••
1
1 I I 1 o I10
I_ ra,a, "".
4-'
i
I
c- ur;) 1
0 -"-i I
1 1.
111
1-
IEW
0 t 4-„, \
Z v 2
1
z
7 1
L- v
c.,--
c--
1 m 1O. 17)
4 cl/ 1
1..,
cu c 0 owV)
At CI40II -C
Jit
at z000 .. 1 •--,..
ct.0 • )-,-, 1 _,..- 4 1111 in
tr) —
0. t •411 E c',,,
o 41 -, - • (-- __ i 1- zu
1 a. tri
Z
1 0 Ma) 13 '
1- 00
2c0
va X
D.c (1) ,-- = • I Cr00E7:
1.1.10U0 '.. CL
C
Lel fil
crl c----
j- -).._.,
I
w.
ci.
11.9
4 g0 .0 (.2i0)
i...)
V C '•-•
Z
N
IA
2. ..„, L.
O c ra No.liki.
vieI. cri
CL -
O c crt ----•-,
t: E •""ici. 0 tu
0
u. .0
0) c 4Cc.,-,-,
0
0) a)
t."
et < N-e--- ,''' q ci
I, °
7070...
4.., 0 .....„
180
at
4)
E
an 0 0coa)
U
0
0 0.1 0.
0 I 3 'CU ra C
0.,c Oa a
4) .-
74F., "t. 0 4.40Wool0121
t\ kj • t_
1 ..-\/
z.ti
V.I.
t'n
0 0- To w
r
I- Ks' \-----
u.;C01Doto (a to ..S., szt tow ru
0 g10 *..:i ra c 1E *-• c ›,,,, 2 4../
li. . c E
0
4. towc0_ C 3 to
II
0
fa fa 0 c,0 .4,1 fl. OD in
0 C
a
1.-15
IiiiUv 63
N _kJ
CV
C
ta.
0 co 13
41 07. C 13
il;,,, ° 01 tv (1.1 • ...c 4 1E
In 00 .= ..0 0 co 1- 4"
Q c al "')
t ‘-'b v) '- \i• 0 -10
U)
cA V") a += j_C x 4. c oj C fit 00 0"
0
0 1...0
m LI, cra
4..4,,, ..... „,„ X .... 0 7,--•
0
0
Nt
P's 01
V . Da. a '•' " " • 13 w w w
owcI-01. 0 fu ,„, 0 >. a) "0 el- 0 to tz00is ,.. 0 :14 = CU , c 4, 01,.. x 1. (0 lz t.,,) •••
44 .:::
VI C C 2 D w44 -E" Is ru c 0 4 La %. '-..--C\‹ -%.
c
E ' 'Ct.c ,„.., „„,,,,
0 - f..) - -. .t. a) c t., = 4. 4n fl) 44 C 4.• .0 r.,... gu .0 0 :a" 4.. k-4 C t,4 Z ,.., 1 -0) 0 8 - i.) 4. w ru63 -0 .0 •E, wk._0 .... . 0 4, ... .... ... 4. 4.0 W
r
0 C ,t4 ,„c fwei isfl, c = c tn 0 go 0 0 =
a,
C E .2 T: u ) 2.2
LAs4 -.C. _ , .0 0 f I! a . m_-, **
Z. --a u
L.
I) a
Lla 0Ct,4 (-6 C :7.1 '1.1 t.= ''••• 4.. 0 LI
Id ' Q \k) E 5-' to- x -el) I-4 ai /3 03 0 (13 "C.
t:1* 41
ji.
W
Iti "
C
Z" Z
u4ci, > ..._ ,,, x ....c .c c c
4, 4., N•ci k....0 4‹ "'--..) ''.- -t0 ,..° a ›. 6,'-' ,.. .... = ..., = ti) c t-) I u.1 _ .0 i n
14. z c bj.) 0 1,... eit 6" 0 '1.1
01 0
a"13 u` '6" 44 W 0 0
Z00tto .... c
C - MC c4-' 1Z fa &I .
0 01 cvaf ,..
E 5 . ,,,; ,.-,0, ,,.,- w 0
0 E fu 1., Z la c to 0 ,k): 0
i.
3.• MI O. 4- 15 4.• = 0 C "" C 0
4, ,
i) -00. 'A
J IN,i5 - _a „,
1t - E
12 IC4.• .113 Ct. .... a) '0 0
0
120
J1-.....- 1
0 ••• 4. ›. .... 4.) 10 0 ..'r.' Si C . 0 -1N...1. , ,,,,,...)
11,11 s ,,,,i
q 2 -z
v° o-p.C 00, ... 0 0 C
Crs-
m. 1601 ° 8 ti:$ `,.0 te, •.T. ta E .- a: Q... (1••• cg--- (3- Ni*, - 4--
ts..t t...... .....0
s0 -
C4., '"u3
1)
11...
vim
4)
12
244
09 i ..,:,
s. 9 %' _p0)
ci -44, ...3 .....s, ,SoI- 0
4ral 0
x._ ..............lit,41 , , ‘....._,)L4
4.1. r.i. evi 4 Lri 4 <
1)
A - Li-
I., ,
4_, ,v-,
1.-=k,, 0 (.) q t t
cco ia z
a
JroL
C JciY
t•cuIro
V
Q
w 0.0.
12
fU
1/1 c ' ''-f.L
a
L C E. v V) 4 i
V1. L .
t ca_
4., a > a a CO m 0 4 k cam, -
us
L
L C' tII '` . cV Q. i/ 1
C c .5 5 c v c v 5 4,
A1 i 3` \
3 3 foICY-.
1VNov3
O
a) im WL+ .c w t H L .0 o D C
MG : O = = O a C L t
rl--
SS
J
R a u a
O'
S•
6' zIIccvoNNtiNQ c c a
V r gas_
ap 8 p xL Q i-
G ) }} QQ ' vJ9 cacnca `
c o ro
qC • ) O+. v. vsa o Q /) r _ l'.-• .v -,
1 .C L F
tn
tio. c to v 1)
Cojj r; Q t-
v o 7 i L r
0 3 aa` a S zIiIi: II
fo a 3
Y L
4-' 1- 1--O . OD u t^
a O •a ' a a a)
A _ a .0 o. U C C '0 i .0 n 1 Q m
Q to j C, rt, O O C) O 1-j 7 .) ICI
C. 7 CO
w 0p O v 3 0 0 tin
C
0 7 17-7w_ Oo = L '
C O =
coca °3 d 'C C/,, S O W
a
L '" Q. x 'a c ._ f°
s u. '- L• a G l ' d a z
c
V
t0 f6 Q a C U , to f0 11
4/f
il
caa)) n u i a o o
kn
w ° °
a
f
v, „
0 07
c
3 3 F L d a
C
tJ 3 v) Z
cu w two 13 ro
t.0.
v C LLIIIIIUJIIIILa}
L1•O
3fa ,C = a S 'ON (51 v 0yzOacc ••• H i .L C
a Y a C o y
s'
id 4....CU
0. v'
s to v O u to 5 Oa .c a
N.m
c;
i uc c a ta) uo ;C ° C
O
c..
a c r\a
471\
2- '-'- Qt
Ou
to
c - > s -c0- 'L = C 0 -cc 330E v t% -a = a
0.
cl., 0 1. 1 , •, 7 OAa
0 0 ;c a v v- 0 t 3 0) c
0 a) L O v a) oQ ,
a)
0cn .
0 o `! 0 ( i C 0 O --s
l , '>
s o ,
3
t2 o c ° _
O.
a) V c cav, y to • a d .0 W r t
0 > o = a u tin . a t C s 0 -0"
CD
C2
i .` ` ` \
U
t :
i N sri vi Q Q
1
j
NI
I
CCC
f:
S
iV
2
N Stb
0
t 4
E
Je
xR f
T.-, 1 k, 6
0 N d
a 13
V' LI
v n i
Oc i A`
C 0 11,7) k), : qk
s \
03, .:1 ‘4)i ' 4
1, .._,
VI z 4 N.% '''‘ .4
14 Z1 la Z
VI N
IN 0ka
iI of a J t G` ? O
F-
0 4-,
Si
41 ,
i\
N.
1-
w o IN, - ,,I. 1i. -,....„, Na. ii. il- Clr I- 1-
cu 2
UJ 0
3 V 4
r W
o 0L O c Q d' a z
c u z \4,\ a ,,, i
N o.. 7,
cE v
1I) 0 Pd 1 WoO0Cat1' Z t)) ` 2 i z
40
C v VI Q q ., . N s N
a
C m U a , Z a 2J
C
E N Z
V Q) j
O. N
a) F=.1:
1\
1)
4sZ4,92
i
Os
a
i V) O
ILS 1, 1.
c
r
O
q. rolb
o
ate 3. N i 4.6
y is cl N 1
tV,.*6-•
4...;c1 r)
A-- ,,,, . ..„=„,.._ Q.> •
ill f
1
t
i I 1- I 12 . m,1 • .) *.. .
1 1
ill -
ca t, ,.- .1/4,,..•411- ClIA [_.. ..7), b .4,.....
i ,, i
i i nN„cs.1,1 1 - Z'CI t)
4-.. _
511
d '‘,..
A \4) 0 "`•:,,,,,i0I_
6a
0 I 1 i 1c. 0 04-t I \ i 17, I t \4 1 2. -- .. C --.i ‘ 11Tr.-, I 1
i
I
a 2'1 I N\t...1,19,,,_ I • 1L._ . z - f::: :
t
1 (rN
r v 0
Z Z00
0
to ,
01
U t
a ,1
k...s.
cs 4- ''3
2: ,ti. • 0 0 c
c •,.. -'
4 40
3 -/i.i 1 ,,, 1.1 ,,, A 3 - . '..
2
t.- ---
R v, , 2 1c _
414 4 '()E ID 1') A
iS,sn
lv"-, --
01Yi,c1_, '''
s l'
il34, ‘&)• sr 1--. Ia) 0 a) k Qk En 4— -.:1,1 CS. liN O•ca k -Ilk 1.., =
0 cil 1— CI
4 0 Th -c
c 0. c VI 5 LI
1. cc z3.-------0 o o u)
u
ct x (7,0 -- A 4 ..../ -J 5 ,---- cl-
tij1...
s,
s4
0. 0 _,-
0 --
a) '-k,:
s
4
i
C --- — 1 I-Th<a) I-,,,.- 04' 4) E
@ .si ----
c-, ,i ) S i, --, (le ,.,3, „ x
i .-....,ol, <5 --• --
Luz
u.,
2
CD m (1.) c J
3
aa,
164 inc:
4.1
a) .•-•• a)
o 4.,
4
2
6 D cn N4
E a)44Aj. P.g la c
13 01 i i i ''' _..ilt it"'
Z. St;,... 4411111IN0D
rl 0
i
x..‘
t .
5"-- c1.__,..„_0.- cr. _.z..
zcr-
a. 7---
0 i_ 1,0 ,.., . -....., 1 c•-• ‘ t---- k \..., (.."--• 1 t-is ...'s's...
Q --— 1. 1
AIS-4072 3.
Business Meeting One
Meeting Date: 02/04/2020
Length (in minutes): 40 Minutes
Agenda Title: Joint Meeting with Town Center Advisory Commission
Submitted By: Sean Farrelly, Community
Development
Item Type:Joint Meeting-Board or Other Juris. Meeting Type: Town Center
Development
Agency
Public Hearing:No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
Town Center Development Agency Board/ Town Center Advisory Commission Joint
Meeting
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Meet with the Town Center Advisory Commission to discuss its 2019 Annual Report and
draft 2020 Goals.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Town Center Advisory Commission (TCAC) makes recommendations to the Board of
the Town Center Development Agency (TCDA) on urban renewal policy, budget and
implementation measures. Since updating its bylaws in September 2017, the TCAC makes
recommendations on urban renewal policy, budget and implementation measures for the
Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal area as well as the City Center (Downtown) urban renewal
area.
Two items will inform the joint meeting discussion - the TCAC's 2019 Annual Report, and
the 2020 Draft Goals. The 2019 Annual Report was previously provided in the December 5,
2019 Council Newsletter.
The 2019 TCAC Goals were:
1. Downtown: Identify new revitalization projects & drive existing projects to
completion in the Downtown Urban Renewal District.
2. Tigard Triangle: Participate in the development of the Tigard Triangle Equitable
Urban Renewal Implementation Project.
3. SW Corridor: Consider, investigate and recommend specific planning components
associated with the adopted SW Corridor alignment and station locations in both
downtown and the Triangle.
4. Affordable Housing: Recommend specific programs and policies to City staff and
Council that directly affect, support and encourage the development and preservation of
affordable housing downtown and in the Triangle.
5. Equitable Business Development: Recommend specific programs and policies to City
staff and Council that directly affect, support and encourage equitable business
development downtown and in the Triangle.
The TCAC's specific recommendations for TCDA are also included in the 2019 Annual
Report; these are:
Continue to work with Metro and TriMet to ensure light rail stations are walkable and activate
the area around them.
Ensure that the Hall Street station design optimally connects with the Downtown Main
Street area
Provide safe and effective pedestrian access across Hall Blvd
Provide bike and pedestrian access on the Highway 217 crossing
Implement A New Tigard Triangle: Equitable Urban Renewal Implementation Strategy Plan
Look for opportunities to partner with developers and other agencies to increase the
supply of affordable housing units.
Land in the Tigard Triangle is going to become increasingly expensive and difficult to
acquire, especially if the Southwest Corridor project is funded. Acquire land prioritized
in the implementation plan.
Develop opportunities for equitable business development in the Triangle through urban
renewal funding and other funding sources such as grants.
The TCAC developed draft goals for 2020 at its January 8th meeting. The TCAC will present
and review these draft goals with the TCDA Board before finalizing them at their February
12th meeting.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
N/A
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS
Tigard City Council Goals 2019-2021
Goal 2: Invest and connect key areas of the city to promote economic growth and community
vitality
Strategy 2.2: Continue to make Downtown Tigard a place people want to be by making
substantial progress on projects that attract new residential and business investment.
Tigard Strategic Plan Goal 3:
Engage the community through dynamic communication.
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
February 5, 2019:Joint meeting with TCAC
Attachments
2019 TCAC Annual Report
2019 Annual Report of the Town Center Advisory Commission to the Board of the
Town Center Development Agency
December 1,2019
The Town Center Advisory Commission (TCAC) adopted annual goals and objectives for
calendar year 2019. The annual agenda for the TCAC was largely devoted to developing and
implementing the goals. This report is organized around the adopted 2019 TCAC Goals and
Objectives.
Aspirational Goal: Facilitate opportunities for development that promotes
walkability, equity, and connectivity across both urban renewal districts.
Outcomes
Walkability within and connectivity between the two urban renewal districts continues to
be a key issue for the commission. In June,we received a briefing on the Red Rock Creek
Trail design which includes a proposed trail that would cross Highway217 on the SW
Corridor overpass. The TCAC sent a letter to Mayor Snider in his role as chair of the TCDA
Board and as a member of the SW Corridor Steering Committee,strongly supporting the
inclusion of bike and ped facilities in the overpass design (See attached letter).
The TCAC participated in the development of"A New Tigard Triangle: Equitable Urban
Renewal Implementation Strategy". Several commissioners were on the New Tigard
Triangle sub-committee and we held a joint working session with the sub-committee in our
August meeting. A final draft of the plan was presented in our October meeting and we
voted to recommend acceptance of the New Tigard Triangle Strategy by the TCDA along
with the guidance that land acquisition for parks and roads be prioritized (See attached
recommendation).
The TCAC supported several projects that promote walkability,equity,and connectivity
across Downtown and the Tigard Triangle:
Senior Center Affordable Senior Housing
A New Tigard Triangle Implementation Strategy
72nd and Dartmouth development assistance
Tigard Street Heritage Trail
Goal 1. Downtown: Identify new revitalization projects &drive existing projects to
completion in the Downtown Urban Renewal District.
Outcomes
Progress has been made on several existing projects:
Construction has begun on Tigard Street Heritage Trail/Rotary Plaza. The project
includes a public restroom,which the TCAC has strongly advocated for.
The Main Street at Fanno project continues to move forward. The TCDA approved
the project plan at its September 3 meeting,which was one of the milestones in the
development agreement.
Members of the TCAC participated in the selection of Northwest Housing
Alternatives to be the developer of the Senior Center affordable senior housing
project and are participating in the stakeholder meetings that will help select the
architect and provide ongoing input into the design of the project.
Another area of focus for the TCAC this year has been the Universal Plaza. Members
of the TCAC volunteered to assist in a"public life"survey run by Gehl Studios.We
had briefings on the survey results in our August and September meetings. The
Commission is concerned about activation and maintenance of the plaza. A
representative of the TCAC will help evaluate proposals from consultants for the
activation, design and engineering of Universal Plaza.
The joint Urban Renewal Improvement Programs Joint Committee made two new matching
grant awards: 1) Stirato Bakery&Bistro for interior buildout and 2) Fraternal Order of
Eagles for paint and signage. We also saw the successful completion of the Senet Taphouse
and Versus Board Games project. These projects continue to revitalize the Downtown
district and draw more people into the city center.
Goal 2.Tigard Triangle: Participate in the development of the Tigard Triangle
Equitable Urban Renewal Implementation Project.
Outcomes
The key initiative for the TCAC in 2019 was the development of The Tigard Triangle
Equitable Urban Renewal Implementation Strategy (renamed A New Tigard Triangle:
Planning for Equitable Development).
The goal of the plan is to provide direction for strategic public investments that support
and catalyze equitable development in the Triangle that is consistent with the community's
vision, ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to benefit from the area's economic
transformation.
There were a significant number of public outreach meetings as well as stakeholder
interviews. And a subcommittee of four commissioners and four community members was
formed to develop the criteria used to rank projects and review the draft prioritized list.
The draft implementation plan was reviewed by TCAC and TCAC Subcommittee at a joint
meeting in August. The subcommittee strongly recommended continued public outreach
as projects are being considered.
A final draft of the plan was presented in our October meeting and we voted to recommend
acceptance of the New Tigard Triangle Strategy by the TCDA along with the guidance that
land acquisition for parks and roads be prioritized (See attached recommendation).
Goal 3.SW Corridor: Consider, investigate and recommend specific planning
components associated with the adopted SW Corridor alignment and station
locations in both downtown and the Triangle.
Outcomes
The TCAC received a briefing from city staff on the Hall Blvd. station design in our May
meeting. While the station will be outside the Downtown Urban Renewal District,we are
concerned about how the city can link the station with downtown. This includes the design
of the pedestrian crossing and transit-oriented development along Commercial Street.
In October,a TriMet representative presented an update on the SW Corridor project
including a significant budget shortfall and possible ways to close the funding gap.
Community Development Director Kenny Asher outlined Mayor Snider's concerns over the
narrowing of Barbur Blvd. and the elimination of the section to Bridgeport as possible ways
to eliminate the shortfall. The commission continues to support the LPA that preserves
naturally occurring affordable housing and does not necessitate on-grade crossing of Hall
Blvd.
Goal 4.Affordable Housing: Recommend specific programs and policies to City staff
and Council that directly affect, support and encourage the development and
preservation of affordable housing downtown and in the Triangle.
Outcomes
The TCAC was directly involved with several affordable housing initiatives:
The commission participated in the selection of the developer for the Senior Center
affordable senior housing project and has two members on the stakeholder
committee. The stakeholder committee has provided input on the selection of an
architect and will provide design and implementation input throughout the project.
CPAH's Red Rock Creek Commons project broke ground in October. The TCDA's
provision of developer assistance, pursuant to the TCAC's recommendation, early in
the lifecycle of this project was instrumental in moving the project forward.
The New Tigard Triangle: Planning for Equitable Development Project ranks
affordable housing as a priority in the near term (next 5 years). Funding will be
requested in future TCDA budgets to provide development assistance for affordable
housing.
Goal 5.Equitable Business Development: Recommend specific programs and
policies to City staff and Council that directly affect,support and encourage equitable
business development downtown and in the Triangle.
Outcomes
In March,the TCAC received a presentation from the Metro project manager for the
Southwest Equitable Development Strategy(SWEDS).He gave a briefing on SWEDS and on
potential programs to support equitable business development.
In exchange for developer assistance,the developer of the 72nd and Dartmouth project was
open to an agreement to provide below market rent for a portion of the building's retail
space. The hope was that this could be used to support equitable business development.
Staff developed an outline for such an agreement,but also reported it would be challenging
to implement. Due to the challenges of administering such a program,we reduced our
recommendation from$1.6 M to$1.0M in developer assistance. While there was a
consensus on the decision,the commission recognizes that we may have missed an
opportunity to promote equitable development. Consequently,the commission hopes to
enhance our knowledge base concerning means and methods of achieving equity.
Business and development assistance ranked as a near term priority in the New Tigard
Triangle report. Business and development assistance program development with a focus
on equity will be a part of Phase 2 of the project.
The Town Center Advisory Commission is already looking forward to 2020 and the kickoff
of our key initiative:the implementation of A New Tigard Triangle: Equitable Urban
Renewal Implementation Strategy Plan.
On behalf of the Town Center Advisory Commission,
Kate Rogers
Chair
Recommendations for Town Center Development Agency Consideration
Background:
The Town Center Advisory Commission(TCAC)is charged with advising the Town Center
Development Agency(TCDA) on policy and projects related to the City Center Urban
Renewal Plan and the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan.The commission is charged
with producing an annual report and recommendations for the TCDA's consideration.
2019 Recommendations
Continue to work with Metro and TriMet to ensure light rail stations are walkable
and activate the area around them
o Ensure that the Hall Street station design and location promote connectivity
with the Downtown Main Street area
o Provide safe and effective pedestrian access across Hall Blvd.
o Provide bike and pedestrian access on the Highway 217 crossing
Implement A New Tigard Triangle: Equitable Urban Renewal Implementation
Strategy Plan:
o Look for opportunities to partner with developers and other agencies to
increase the supply of affordable housing units
o Land in the Tigard Triangle is going to become increasingly expensive and
difficult to acquire, especially if the Southwest Corridor project is funded. So,
we would like to see land acquisition prioritized in the implementation plan.
o Develop opportunities for equitable business development in the Triangle
through urban renewal funding and other funding sources such as grants.
0
T DCD
0
rD
rD
rriCD ,
n
r
D CD
CD r
ice.,
CD a)0• +
0
n 0 N 0
v)
0 N
O
O LLD
NO -'CD
O CD
O Q 0
arta moi., 3 ortl
0 3
R
ata
F O CD 3
N 0
N
0
NJ
0
i. Ts o w ° o l0
o v O arca r Q rD `() m i=1: —I
n Fp- ‹ cu m
vv, -.
CD a)D n
rD w r rD = rD o
r 2 N v 0- 0_ rt 5• c * ' -
n om
O OCrDIQr-r o =n 0q
cnr.}• C _v
v,
Ort .-
1-
C N Dr) O it; -. < (D = Q,
H CDD
CO CD ("D<
rte+
Oi-t•
Ey
rD -7.
r•+ 0
0 :..r 0
rD
m- -I
CD Cu rDoo
C—D
O r
0_ = Qo m
71 cn n g O N Q rD
F)'
r-r
cu 0
pro
CD o 3 a' v,
CTQ 73
CD o CD
f rD r; 0- rD cu
rD r=
09 73
r-+ v 0
CD rD CND O Oro 00
el 1.
rO -• tu N 5•CD O
c en I- -h 5. 0• N
rp
iO O_ O
CD
0-1 Oh n r+
OCUOrDO
0-h C r7
e 3
rD
rD O'
o- 0-
O v rD o-
0O N ..-1- NO rD 0
CD CCD 0_ rf GrDcnnncCDVI
o pro -< rD * rD
n CU
rD
7r--r
rD
o
N
Nr II - z n
o
rD —I coma) 1—
i C O '
rt m
ri.
O- < M = "a p O O VI O l)
0 = ' 5 o z t
CD -0 Q
r+ 0 -N fD fD N p rt)
O n
0 v s p s vRsa Cf
o
fD
co
I fD0, z- v fD Q.°
0O .. Q- s = Q
a. = -I fD r• CDD -h rt a—' C (Dl;
N -0 •-r a =
Q [
D (
D n
O I•a)
Q _r p rt
N 0 Vf• UqCD 13
a' cn - Q MO
Q. 0- 0'a C + m
a' Q v
VI
I fD 5 r - c C r
O
C ( s rt MI MB
a N -
Q
Q
C7 O CT 0 =C rt
0
s `_. 0 0
LA I fD Q fD r C) 0 i'0 M
N CD F o p C N a'
N
O N m -N = 0-2 VI 0 V)
n
fD
r+= a fD
D- n O CD
N 70
F `.
CMv,
fD r F C•)
C O O '{ a'N = Or) -0 = - N Q CD r+
rh
D rD ON Q 3 N
SD =' QX 3 v, • p
e--r CD 0'q 0 CCD
r+
O O N fD
O O0
s1
n•2
a'' * [
D CD CD v
04
rOr
CD
fD
fD O S.r+
C 0
s
O n
aa'
v
0Mq CD ,N r-r
S O
rr
r t CD
O fD f
fD
70
CD
0 O 0 D CD v
O 3 N n•
2 M ,C r
D fD N C
a)
rD Q r-I
rD D
O * 0
0 Q OlD c
rD rD n
r
O
n 0=I
pp CD "O_r. n4irDnCD
rt
co N' C CF
CD rD
r r
a) p0n
ars
v n, 0 O 0 rD ppQ
o o
3 a) 0 0 Q
cn O
N• -a 0% O Q° 0
O
r*
v n•. D N 0)
rtr-1-
V) N O'
Ort
n CCD
cp O CU
C O •
7 O• X7. v
D n v
0
rD n -
co -a 0 D
3 , 0 o a CD 3 •
rt Oti 0 CD
r
CD NC- C rDn O
o o
cr n
p 1
0_
vv
0_ v o r a
0 < CH CCQom
a) Orr•
v*cOOCnGOMD
1. rCCri.
r-r
rt N C
Q r-r ,..F Q N D rD
5• Q Of ' 0) O C C
C' r+
fD 0
C + r+ (D 0 CD D
7. a)
rD 1 *
masrD
0
cm ro n- rD o m
v, ma 17fD
rD -
O
O r+ CD OO
rD co
m 0_ Q rD ON
Q rD
t
r-I_ 01
C O n O 0) Ort
O C p
C CU C
s CfQDOre,
Q
E• s
rD r+
O n C 0
rD a>
o x v
o
D Z
o s=
r+ = rD CD . CM G
O rt rD cn p o
ED -,
fD•
73 ° rD t O =
D 73 m N al < a' n0 N a
O c r+
O CM
0
o =
c—' w v
a C 3 ,
rF L N m B p.
N m
S = = w su n CD
rF —
CD o r*. o rF
0
Qcn -,
O C O O• n CD
CD ,{3CD w
0
0_ Q.
n Cy CD rD -5 V)
C < D v N• N = N 0'4 CD
0
CD
r-F CD o (D
CD
O CD =' arca D CD D-
CU
0 -0 0'q a, 0_ -, D CD
D =00 c N O n- r-f
0NJ
CD
F
v CD O•
r-I
D . r'+
N o
oObiCDcinO. G O
MI ,--r 3co CD CD
v
N
CD
0 r° r+ C C'1CD
N N pi Cr N
r-r 0 20
n
r-F
CD CD
0
CD
v
O I —I
0 -, -.
O_ _ N
T
C
c -, -, .-
1- -1-1 = n•
Eh
r r
V (lV
Di
Di •
0 N -0 • = C a) -
f•D
N M -'
G
v, -
0 3 a) (D CD -
n 0 a) o
o Di 3
CDe-
1cm 0 Q c M
1-1
CD• K-,rD =
0 rD mC •N a.v CD o m O
n o Eo crv
O O N D
r-
i-
r
h v z cn E
orD
r) CD aQ
Q c Q CDn- D
0_71.7 N r+
0 crQ N aF = 0
ED x
cuN
CD
n
CD rtN73
0
O
r-
O chi,
0
M N O
O'
fD
a) 0
0
r I
0 o h 70
m- C 0)
Cr
C
Q
N 0)
0
n
fD
N
0
fi
n C
O M
O
CD
27 - 1 =• n
m rD
n
07) O O D
rn+ .
O n O rt'
c
0 rD ccn (D = O
c 7' CD 0 Q a
r N r1 n . .
CD r"f
co n
CD 0 o N
E
0 n cu CD
O
O
rt
N
rN+
I On O
M
rte_+
an —
r-t —. crq
O a0 r rr
CD N 0_ CD
NC7
0 DD
3 a- r+ C2-
h 3 o -
o c0cu
o CD =
o 0_ 3
ET
0
N
m O CD
o
M0_
v m
0
CsV)
r+ 0_
rD
Q. (D -0 >
0 O D O - ,
Or
N w Q a) r+ n 1- fD Q
O r)D < C r-*. O "7 to
r
Q <<
rD
5 cm s n) 3 D- 74 _
cm tD C D Q
Q CD -..< O crQ
Et
r-
pvl
q
ca.
rt O p' O 3'
N - — O G'1VICD
r+ -+ DO• v
O x 2 c N Q 3 CUa
DCD moi, CSD SD CD O
O 04 r-+ N
U, _ = D O
n
c•)
DJ O O (D O
rte+
CD
0- N 0..
r*
v p r$ O 0 3
cin
in n
v
0
O
n O
D N0 -< n
O O O t-
O -'r,
n
vl CA <
CA (Dc, n
5. (r)
r+ O
0tl t- h
O cn -s
3 C a)
cr 13 v
0 D
O
Ort-
0j 0_
r+ O D
N
N
D-.
Q J D rn
O =0, --z -0
O
Cr
n aq
rr
O () m• c
c o
0_ Q O Z -% Q cin
t- -
0
C n (D CO O fD
O
m
o_ m E O O (DD
O n p
v a
c - m mCDst -h e+
CO N 74: CO 61
O vp
rD
Po
m CD v) n
O
N <
r
rD 3
rD ri-
N
r+
c TD O_ O
Cr .
r(D
OO n (D
D
rt n
rD ti
a n
a) rt
0
CD
AIS-4100 4.
Business Meeting One
Meeting Date: 02/04/2020
Length (in minutes): 15 Minutes
Agenda Title: TCDA - Update on Senior Center Affordable Housing Project
Submitted By: Sean Farrelly, Community
Development
Item Type:Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Meeting Type: Town Center
Development
Agency
Public Hearing:No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
Receive update on Senior Center Affordable Housing Project
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
The Board of the TCDA is requested to participate in the discussion.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
The Tigard City Council's current goals include a strategy (3.2) to promote the development
of affordable housing in Tigard. The strategy is being implemented in part with the Tigard
Senior Center Affordable Senior Housing project that would provide affordable senior
housing adjacent to the Tigard Senior Center.
The Board of the TCDA authorized the signing of an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with
non-profit affordable housing developers Northwest Housing Alternatives (NHA) on
October 8, 2019. Since then, there has been significant progress. The Tigard Senior Housing
Advisory Committee (made up of stakeholders from the Tigard Senior Center, Town Center
Advisory Committee, neighborhood and Councilor Tom Anderson) has met five times. The
meetings covered the following topics:
October 14 - An overview of the project and NHA's and the City's goals
October 28 - Interviews and recommendations for architect firm (selected SERA
Architects)
November 18 - Design charette
December 16 - Interviews and recommendation of general contractor advisors (selected
Walsh Construction)
January 13 - Reviewed latest site plan concept
The Advisory Committee will tour an NHA-operated affordable senior housing development
in Wilsonville on February 6.
SERA Architects and Northwest Housing Alternatives have worked through several site plan
and building configuration options. The current site plan calls for a 4-story building with
between 50 and 60 affordable senior units (final count to be determined) and 87 parking
spaces. Existing Senior Center conditions have 48 parking spaces, so it appears that the
parking demand for the senior center and residents can be accommodated (along with NHA's
strategy to accommodate the portion of residents without their own car- daily vanpools for
residents to shopping and leisure activities, etc.) NHA will present the most current site plan
at the February 4 Board meeting.
The City's attorneys are working up a draft Development Agreement and lease. After further
negotiation, the documents will be brought to the TCDA Board for their consideration.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
No alternatives for consideration at this time.
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES,APPROVED MASTER PLANS
Tigard City Council Goals 2019-21
Goal 2: Invest and connect key areas of the city to promote economic growth and community
vitality
Strategy 2.2 Continue to make Downtown Tigard a place people want to be by making
substantial progress on projects that attract new residential and business investment. Cultivate
more relationships with future developers that share our multigenerational transit-oriented
development vision.
Goal 3: Ensure Tigard grows and develops in a smart and inclusive manner.
Strategy 3.2: Complete an Affordable Housing Plan and adopt recommended strategies to
promote the development and retention of affordable housing in Tigard. Increase advocacy at
the regional level for housing that is affordable, funding strategies, and consider an excise tax.
Tigard Comprehensive Plan
Housing
Goal 10.1: Provide opportunities for a variety of housing types to meet the diverse housing
needs of current and future City residents.
Special Planning Areas- Downtown
Goal 15.2: Facilitate the development of an urban village.
Policy 6: New housing in the downtown shall provide for a range of housing types, including
ownership, workforce, and affordable housing in a high-quality living environment.
Tigard Strategic Plan
Goal 2: Ensure development advances the vision
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
June 4, 2019- Senior Center Affordable Senior Housing Briefing
August 13, 2019- Receive Update on Senior Center Affordable Housing Project
October 8, 2019- Consider Agreement with Northwest Housing Alternatives
Attachments
No file(s) attached.
I I t• C
1
i • tri f,/ti..1
n
il 4.0, \,. 0 .
1
4
I- iirigi1 -------1.„,,,,,,„,,,, --,I ,
1.-7....`,,. ,:.•,,,,,• rid r.
Pi
I 4v.It 1 3
aq if
tl:
illi''
t-•;. I ,.. „,.\,;, :,
0.)
t 11 11 I
CD_ i I ilisilF...:
110
D e1,..e.,,, .
a.
I -4
L. V I • ] I 14:
0 Mil iga 16lit332k0MI2MfaaIf;IthatI1illla1gt5PM 16hilliZZZI:e, I Nall :
ig&
I 4 J
iiis
N 1:..I 1 \a,.k\ a a N'',1/4 IN ' '
I
i1 ' ' 11
I :i 1:b.
I_r)
I.:. .1 . .
D
I- 1 :: i. .=•:::: .,.
rD M
i
MI M
i . F
1 rD
0 D
rCi-i• ,
01 ft)
1) OQ r+
s il) = -IO
0- a) — ao m.
r—l• (/) —
e+ =
0.1 0 (0 Eh
Cfrol 0 = * -
1
0.) OCI rD
1.4;,:',.:.:,,ii.::_I, —
1 $
Co 0- -1 •• 1 1----rD
r) 0
SUPPLEM AL PACKET
FOR(
DATEOFMEETING) NorthwestHousing
Alternatives
Tigard Senior Affordable Housing
Project Guiding Principles
Northwest Housing Alternatives in partnership with the Tigard Senior Housing Advisory Group developed
a set of guiding principles for the Tigard Senior Affordable Housing project. These guiding principles are
touchstone parameters for the Architect and General Contractor to follow to ensure that community input
is a part of this project. This includes a focus on emphasizing care for the environment,facilitating services
for seniors and an interest to highlight transportation.
The following is a list of the Project Guiding Principles:
1. Senior Living in Tigard
For seniors,the project should facilitate the ability to live safely and with good health,with access
through various modes of transportation to what the Tigard community has to offer.
2. Environmental integrity and Stewardship
Design and construction should facilitate the physical integration with the existing the
neighborhood and natural amenities; and should include measures to protect Fanno Creek and
the surrounding natural area.
3. Integration
Design and programming should facilitate the social and programmatic integration with the
existing Meals on Wheels programming and resident services.
4. Engagement and Transparency
With the City and the community, the development process should facilitate engagement with
stakeholders and offer transparency through the decision-making process.
Update —Tigard Senior Affordable Housing
Background
During the last decade, Washington County has undergone significant changes in poverty and vacancy
rates coupled with significant population growth. There has been dramatic increases in the number of
residents living in poverty in cities like Tigard. In 2014, Washington County conducted a housing needs
assessment as part of the 2015-2020 Washington County Consolidated Plan. The study identified the need
for 14,000-23,000 additional housing units affordable to renters with incomes at or below 50% area
median income. Sadly, the housing crisis has been particularly daunting for our seniors because of the
short supply of housing that has been developed for the elderly. The City of Tigard has recently taken
several steps to address its disappearing affordable housing, which includes the redevelopment of the
Tigard Senior Center site.
The City of Tigard invited responses to a Request for Qualifications and interviewed three community-
based organizations who submitted required material. Northwest Housing Alternatives (NHA) was
selected by the interview committee and then by the Tigard City Council to develop an affordable housing
property for seniors adjacent to the existing Tigard Senior Center. Based on a feasibility study
commissioned by the City prior to selecting NHA,the project concept is a four-story,wood framed building
with 50 to 60 one-bedroom units and 1 two-bedroom managers unit,with ample parking.
One of the first steps taken by NHA in July 2019 was to convene a Project Advisory Group consisting of
community stakeholders including immediate neighbors, members of the Senior Center Advisory Council
and staff from Meals on Wheels, members of the Tigard Town Center Advisory Commission, and staff
from the City. The committee's purpose is to engage stakeholders, document concerns and set goals for
the project through an articulation of"guiding principles." To date the committee has met six times and
achieved the following milestones:
Established a set of guiding principles for the project that will be used by NHA,the architect and
the builder throughout the development process. See ATTACHED
Selected a project Architect(SERA) and a project builder/contractor(Walsh Construction).
In partnership with SERA and NHA,reviewed and provided input to initial site plan concepts.
Current Activity
Site investigation is currently underway to further test project feasibility. This includes a process of
incorporating the project Guiding Principles with analysis of required zoning, parking,fire and life safety,
and environmental protection of the Fanno Creek natural area. Additionally, the team is anticipating
responding to a Request for Proposals from the Housing Authority of Washington County to secure
funding from the regional Metro Housing Bond, an essential component of the financing for the project.
At the most recent Advisory Group meeting held January 20th,SERA Architects reviewed a conception site
plan that addresses much of the concern regarding parking and massing. SERA's focus will now turn
toward ensuring environmental protection of the natural area. The Group will convene again after the
Housing Authority has issued its RFP for Metro Bond funds so the committee can review SERA's work and
understand the funding critiera.
The graphic below shows the anticipated phasing of development timeline:Concept and feasibility,secure
funding,detailed design,financial closing,construction,and leasing.
Metro Bond
en
S 0
h
N
1 III • IIIT ' IIli RIIIIIIIIIIjIIIII
Concept Secure Funding Detailed Oesign GoshConstruction leasing
14?You are here
Contact
For questions and communications, please contact Josh Carrillo, Housing Developer, at
carrillo@nwhousing.org and/or(503)654-1007 x115.
Attachments
Roster of the Tigard Senior Housing Advisory Group
Project Guiding Principles
Links
Original Feasibility Study
https://www.tigard-or.gov/city hall/AH Senior Center Feasibility Report.pdf
City of Tigard Request for Qualifications
https://www.tigard-or.gov/city hall/AH Senior Center RFI.pdf
Introduction of SERA
https://www.seradesign.com/
Introduction of Walsh Construction
https://www.walshconstruction.com/
Introduction of Northwest Housing Alternatives
https://nwhousing.org/
AIS-4117 5.
Business Meeting One
Meeting Date: 02/04/2020
Length (in minutes): 5 Minutes
Agenda Title: Consider Resolution of Support for Artwork for Tigard's Outdoor
Museum
Prepared For: Schuyler Warren, Community Development
Submitted By: Schuyler Warren, Community Development
Item Type:Motion Requested Meeting Type: Council
Resolution Business
Meeting -
Main
Public Hearing:No Publication Date:
Information
ISSUE
Shall the City adopt a Resolution of support to apply to Oregon Department of
Transportation (ODOT) for approval of artwork to be placed on the Highway 99W support
structure as part of Tigard's Outdoor Museum?
STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST
Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY
The City's grant from the National Endowment for the Arts Our Town program provides
funding for three major artworks in Tigard's Outdoor Museum along the Tigard Heritage Trail.
A competitive selection process resulted in two murals proposed for the support structure of
the Highway 99W overpass along the trail.
The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) maintains authority over the
right-of-way in this location and is responsible for the maintenance of the overpass. An art
directive issued in October 2013 specifies terms under which local jurisdictions may request
placement of artwork within the ODOT right-of-way. Staff have reviewed the approval
criteria and determined that the proposal meets the standards set by ODOT.
ODOT requires that the local governing body adopt a resolution of support as part of the
applciation process, and that the resolution provide certain details related to jurisdictional
authority, artwork lifespan, and proposed maintenance.
This resolution meets the requirements set by ODOT for application to add the artwork.
OTHER ALTERNATIVES
Council could opt not to adopt the resolution. This option would require that staff find an
alternative location for a muralist or find an alternative artist prior to the close of the grant in
August 2020, or return a portion of the grant.
COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS
Continue to make Downtown Tigard a place people want to be by making substantial
progress on projects that attract new residential and business investment: Construction of the
Tigard Street Heritage Trail/Rotary Plaza
DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
N/A
Attachments
Resolution
Resolution Exhibit A
Mural Mock-Up
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 20-
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING APPROVAL BY OREGON DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION OF ARTWORK PROPOSED FOR TIGARD'S OUTDOOR MUSEUM
WHEREAS,the City of Tigard has partnered with the Oregon Department of Transportation to complete the
Tigard Heritage Trail along the historic Oregon Electric Railway right-of-way located within the
City's jurisdiction;and
WHEREAS, a vital component of this trail is Tigard's Outdoor Museum, an outdoor art and history museum
that highlights the contributions of Tigard and Washington County's diverse communities to our region and
state;and
WHEREAS, the City, through a comprehensive public engagement process determined that the
community desired artistic interpretation of history;and
WHEREAS,the City sought proposals for artworks through a competitive process;and
WHEREAS, a committee composed of residents and elected officials selected a proposal for two murals to
be placed along the trail on the support structure of the Highway 99W overpass;and
WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the proposed murals and determined them to meet the City's goals
for placemaking and arts development in the downtown;and
WHEREAS, the location of the artwork has historically been a target of vandalism and the proposed murals
will include an anti-graffiti coating to reduce this vandalism; and
WHEREAS,the murals are proposed to remain in place for 10 years, or longer if the work does not deteriorate;
and
WHEREAS, the City will assume responsibility for the care and maintenance of the murals in accordance
with the instructions of the artist;and
WHEREAS,the murals are proposed to be completed no later than June 15,2020.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that:
SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council requests that the Oregon Department of Transportation approve
the creation of two murals on the supports of the Highway 99W overpass through the
agency's art directive HWY 01 effective October 1,2013.
SECTION 2: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage.
RESOLUTION NO.20-
Page 1
PASSED: This day of 2020.
Mayor-City of Tigard
ATTEST:
City Recorder-City of Tigard
RESOLUTION NO.20-
Page 2
Exhibit A
Oregon Department of Transportation Highway Division
Highway Division
DIRECTIVE
NUMBER SUPERSEDES
HWY 01 New
EFFECTIVE DATE PAGE NUMBER
10-1-2013 1 of 6
REFERENCE
SUBJECT RE
Placement of Artwork on State r!J
Highway Right of Way 1 4 .
PURPOSE:
To describe the process to allow artwork to be placed on state highway right of way either as
part of ODOTs project development process or through the District Manager.
GENERAL:
There has been an increasing interest by local communities to incorporate artwork within the
state highway system. The overall design of the state highway system should blend with the
natural and cultural environment keeping in mind the intended traffic volume and preservation
of valuable adjacent scenic lands and natural and historic resources. ODOT recognizes the
effects of the state highway system on local communities and how artwork can enhance and
reflect the historic and cultural character of the community.
This Directive provides a process for ODOT to allow for the enhancement of the state highway
system by including local community artwork on state highway right of way and will apply to
artwork requested or approved after the effective date of the Directive. Safety is of primary
concern for ODOT; therefore any Artwork allowed to be placed on state highway right of way
must be found by ODOT to not diminish the safety of motorists or the state highway system.
It should be noted that this Directive is intended to provide a means to guide ODOT decision
makers in determining the appropriateness of allowing artwork to be placed on state highway
right of way. It is not to imply ODOT's review or approval of the artwork itself. The content of
the artwork is determined by the Local Government as described in this Directive.
After ODOT's review and approval of the proposed placement of artwork, ODOT will initiate an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the requesting Local Government. Should the Local
Government desire to change the design, content or format of the Artwork during the term of
the IGA, a new proposal must be submitted following the process outlined in this Directive.
Artwork on the state highway differs from the City/County Entrance Program and the Highway
Beautification Program described in Oregon Administrative Rule Chapter 734, Division 57.
DEFINITIONS:
Artwork"—Any drawing, painting, sculpture, statue, or other item of a creative or artistic
nature intended or used to attract the interest or attention of motorists but does not include
roadside memorials; political, advertising, or other unpermitted signs. For the purposes of this
Highway Division
Directive HWY 01
Page 2 of 6
Directive, "Artwork" also does not include standard architectural elements, whether structural
or not, such as light poles, overpass screening, sound walls, or bridge components designed
into the highway feature by ODOT during the project development process and are owned and
maintained by ODOT.
Local Government" —The City or County with jurisdiction in the area where the Artwork is
proposed. When a state highway is on recognized tribal land, the Tribal Government with
jurisdiction in the area will be considered the "Local Government"for purposes of this
Directive.
MINIMUM CRITERIA:
A Local Government's proposal for the placement of Artwork on state highway right of way
must address the following criteria. Each proposal will be evaluated by ODOT on a case-by-
case basis as described in this Directive.
Safety
Artwork must not interfere with the operation, maintenance or use of the highway. It must not
block sight distance of an intersection, road approach, or traffic control device or cause a
distraction for motorists, therefore, the proposed Artwork must:
1. Be located outside the highway clear zone as described in the AASHTO Roadside
Design Guide;
2. Be placed as far from the travel way or edge of the pavement as practical;
3. Not be attached to or imitate a traffic control device;
4. Not have moving elements or simulate movement;
5. Not have bold or vibrant colors, reflective or glaring materials or surface finishes, or
have illumination or other elements that would cause the proposed Artwork to be a
distraction to motorists. Any illumination must be shielded to prevent light from being
directed at the highway and of such low intensity or brilliance as to not cause glare or
to impair the vision of motorists on the highway. Flashing or blinking lights, are not
allowed; and
6. Be of a size and scale so to not demand the attention of motorists to the point the
driver is distracted by the Artwork.
The safety of the highway system and motorists is of utmost concern for ODOT. The following
will be considered by ODOT in determining if the proposals to place Artwork on highway right
of way meet this Directive. The Artwork:
1. Does not attract pedestrians to an area not designed or intended for pedestrian traffic
or placed at a location that would cause motorists to stop or to enter or exit the highway
in areas not designed for such use;
2. Is not placed on trees, rocks or other natural features (ground mounted, free standing
artwork may be allowed);
3. Is not attached to any bridge structure, sound wall or other highway feature other than
artwork that may be incorporated as part of the project development process. A mural
painted on a bridge structure, sound wall or other highway feature may be allowed
when located on a low speed highway and is part of an overall graffiti prevention
strategy;
Highway Division
Directive HWY 01
Page 3 of 6
4. Does not interfere with the horizontal or vertical clearance of the roadway so as not to
impede freight mobility or movement of motor vehicles, bicycles, or pedestrians;
5. Is not placed within 500 feet of traffic control devices or other signs, gores, decision
points, or other Artwork; and
6. Does not adversely affect highway structures, drainage patterns or storm water runoff
quality, landscaping, natural vegetation or other plantings.
Content and Format
The content or format of the Artwork is to be determined by the Local Government through a
public review process. The Artwork must depict the historic or cultural characteristic of the
community and blend with the surrounding area.
The Artwork shall not contain text, interpretation of the Artwork, information on the artist, or
advertising or other form of a commercial message (business, product, or brand name, logo,
phone number, web page, etc.). It shall not resemble or imitate a traffic control device,
represent or pay tribute to a specific individual, or contain elements that move, shimmer,
shake or contain other methods to attract the attention of motorists,
Design
The design of all Artwork must be coordinated with the aesthetic design of the highway system
and all its features taking into consideration the roadway design, the clear zone, motorists, and
the environment. The Artwork shall not be suspended over the highway.
Artwork must be designed using long lasting materials and construction techniques which will
require minimal care and resist vandalism and must be no larger than a size and scale that is
compatible with the surrounding area and landscape.
Maintenance
Maintenance of the proposed Artwork and the surrounding area will be the responsibility of the
requesting Local Government as set out in the IGA. The Artwork must be kept clean and in
good repair. Artwork damaged by vehicular crashes, vandalism including graffiti, acts of
nature, or regular wear or aging must be repaired or removed by the Local Government in a
timely manner.
Offensive graffiti must be removed promptly. All maintenance must be conducted in a manner
to minimize interference with highway traffic. No direct access (ingress or egress) to the
Artwork is allowed from the main travel way of an access controlled highway,
If the Artwork is not maintained, repaired, or removed as required, the Artwork may be
removed by ODOT at the Local Government's expense without commitment by ODOT for
restoration, replacement, or compensation to the Local Government. Any Artwork removed by
ODOT will be stored for 30 days for recovery by the Local Government.
Compliance with State and Federal Regulations
The proposed Artwork must comply with all state and federal regulations including regulations
for Outdoor Advertising, and the marking and signing of state highways.
Highway Division
Directive HWY 01
Page 4 of 6
Location
Artwork will be considered on primary and secondary state highways as part of the project
development process or by the District Manager after first considering if it is more appropriate
to transfer the roadway, sidewalk or the property to the Local Government.
Artwork will not be allowed on the Interstate highway system (along the mainline or the
entrance and exit ramps)or in the median of any expressway, freeway or divided highway.
Artwork located on property outside the state highway right of way but visible from the highway
must comply with Outdoor Advertising Sign regulations.
Artwork must be located within the territorial or zoning jurisdiction of the requesting Local
Government.
Financial Responsibilities
All costs, including labor, materials, supplies, and traffic control for the design, engineering,
testing, construction, installation, maintenance, repair and removal of the artwork will be the
responsibility of the requesting Local Government. When illumination is included as part of
the artwork, the Local Government will be responsible for the cost of the electricity and any
necessary utility lines and permits.
ODOT will assume the administrative costs associated with reviewing the proposal for Artwork
and for executing the IGA with the requesting Local Government if the proposal is approved.
APPLICATION PROCESS:
A proposal for Artwork on state highway right of way must be submitted in writing by the Local
Government that has jurisdiction in the area where the Artwork is proposed to be located.
When there is an ongoing project development process, the proposal request will be submitted
to the Project Leader. Other proposals are to be submitted to the local District Manager.
The Local Government must ensure that the proposal is developed through a public process.
The method of gathering local support will be determined by the Local Government.
The Artwork proposal must:
include a full description or drawing of the proposed Artwork including the proposed
materials and how it expresses the community's historic or cultural character;
include the proposed location (highway and milepoint)for the Artwork;
show how the proposal meets the criteria outlined in this Directive;
include the name, address, and telephone number of the Local Government contact
person responsible for the proposal;
include an adopted resolution that describes the following:
o the Local Government's jurisdiction in the area of the project site;
o the Local Government's approval of the Artwork content;
o the Artwork's proposed life span;
Highway Division
Directive HWY 01
Page 5of6
o the Local Government's commitment to ensure maintenance of the Artwork
including timely graffiti removal/repair and removal of the Artwork at the end of its
life span; and
o a schedule for commencing and completing the proposed Artwork installation.
include design plans stamped by a licensed professional engineer registered in the State of
Oregon demonstrating structural stability, the ability to withstand the necessary wind loads,
the means or method of installation, and how the proposed Artwork meets the Safety
criteria outlined above.
ODOT REVIEW:
The proposed site for installation of Artwork by a Local Government must be reviewed and
approved by ODOT prior to development of an IGA. ODOT will apply the criteria in this
Directive when reviewing proposals for placement of Artwork on state highway right of way.
Considerations will include the location, potential for motorist distraction, impact to highway
maintenance or operations, impact to motorist safety, and access for Artwork maintenance.
Additional site specific criteria and conditions may be applied to the Artwork proposal as
determined by the ODOT Project Leader or District Manager. The approval for placement of
Artwork will be granted at ODOT's sole discretion.
When Artwork is proposed as part of the project development process, the Project Leader will
coordinate the review with the Region Technical Center, the local District Manager, and the
Federal Highway Administration; ensure the conditions of this Directive are met; and
incorporate the Artwork into the highway project, if approved. If the proposal is approved, the
Project Leader will be responsible to initiate an IGA to document the Local Government's
responsibility for the Artwork. If the proposal is denied, the Project Leader will notify the Local
Government in writing.
When the Artwork is proposed outside of the project development process, the District
Manager will coordinate the review with the Region Technical Center and the Federal Highway
Administration and ensure the criteria of this Directive are met. If the proposal is approved,
the District Manager will be responsible to initiate an IGA to document the Local Government's
responsibility for the Artwork. If the proposal is denied, the District Manager will notify the
Local Government in writing.
DOCUMENTATION:
Upon approval by ODOT of the proposal for placement of Artwork on state highway right of
way, ODOT will initiate an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Local Government,
The IGA must include:
the location (highway and milepoint)and description of the Artwork;
the duration the Artwork is allowed on the state highway right of way;
a requirement that the Local Government, at no cost to ODOT, must move or remove the
Artwork when:
1. requested by ODOT;
2. the Artwork interferes with construction, maintenance or operation of the state highway;
Highway Division
Directive HWY 01
Page 6 of 6
3. federal or state laws are interpreted in such a way that would prohibit Artwork on state
highway right of way; or
4. the IGA terminates.
indemnification of ODOT by the Local Government from third party claims;
compliance with environmental regulations when conducting work on state highway right of
way;
payment by the Local Government of any costs resulting from legal action involving ODOT
regarding the Artwork;
the Local Government's responsibility to maintain the Artwork and any area surrounding
the Artwork. Artwork damaged by crashes, vandalism, or acts of nature must be repaired
or removed by the Local Government within 14 days of discovery. Offensive graffiti must
be repaired or removed within 48 hours of discovery.
if the Artwork is not maintained, repaired, or removed as required, the Artwork may be
removed by ODOT at the Local Government's expense without commitment for restoration,
replacement, or compensation to the Local Government;
a requirement for a utility permit as necessary to address electric lines serving the Artwork;
notification of the District Manager at least 48 hours prior to any onsite work; and
traffic control according to Oregon Temporary Traffic Control Handbook (OTTCH) and the
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
06/14/13
dv
a
4
moi
i
1RIAlk.
n
J
1
te,
4
r
t
t 11-
SUPPLEMENTAL °AC KET
FOR
DATE OF MEF,T NOL
vt.5 /j /4cG27A
The Tigard City Council is asking voters to consider a five-year operating levy to fund police services.
What will the levy fund?
Add 8 police officers to patrol as primary call responders.
o Provide more citywide coverage to improve police capacity to respond to multiple
emergencies at the same time.
o Provide stronger community policing practices, interacting with residents, schools, and
businesses to address livability concerns and develop community connections.
o Maintain higher minimum staffing levels to address the goal of faster response times to
emergency 911 calls.
Add 1 school resource officer(SRO).
o Increase the number of school resource officers.
o Provide 1 SRO for each of the middle schools and the high school to provide quicker
responses to safety issues and allow for more proactive prevention work.
o Increase presence at school events.
o Increase SRO accessibility through more consistent coverage schedule.
o Focus on proactive work with school staff and social service providers.
Provide initial and ongoing advanced crisis intervention and de-escalation training for all sworn
officers.
o Develop officers' skills to respond to the increasing number of 911 calls involving mental
health crises.
o Train officers by providing information, tools, and resources related to mental health
interactions in an advanced course that currently requires 40 hours of training.
Provide additional support staff in the police department to manage additional evidence and
records as well as 2.2 additional positions to support data informed policing, staff
communications, and hiring.
Why does Tigard need additional police officers?
Over the past 25 years, the region's residential, commercial, and commuter populations have increased
significantly and Tigard's population has grown by nearly 19,000 people. Police calls for service have also
grown in line with population growth. However, minimum staffing levels for patrol are the same today
as they were in 1995. The number of patrol officers on staff are not enough to keep up with demands
for service. Almost half the time, police patrol staffing is 3 officers to respond to calls in the City's 5
patrol districts.
What did the citywide performance audit say about the City's police department?
In 2019, an independent auditor conducted a performance audit of City operations. That report
recommended the City hire an additional 8 patrol officers and 1 school resource officer to address
workload demands and comply with best practices in policing.
For additional information, including a calculator to see the effects of the levy on your property, if
passed, please visit www.tigard-or.gov/tigard levy
Why Does Tigard need additional Police Officers and advanced training?
Over the last 25 years, Tigard's population has grown by nearly 19,000 people and the daily residential,
employment and commuter population has increased by ?%. However, minimum staffing levels for patrol are
the same today as they were in 1995. The number of patrol officers on shift are not enough to keep up with
calls for service. Almost half the time, 3 officers are on duty to patrol and respond to calls in the city's 5 patrol
districts.
Over the last (year? 2 years?) calls for person and property crimes have decreased ?%while societal crime calls
those in mental health crisis?) have increased around 20%. Currently#or%of staff have advanced crisis
intervention training. This levy would provide training for all officers.
Why hasn't funding kept pace with the need?
Police services are funded primarily%? with general fund dollars with property taxes making up%of that fund.
Police services account for?%of that fund, library services ?%, parks maintenance ?% with general city services
making up the remainder. Tigard has one of the lowest property tax rates in Washington County. Since 1990
state law restricts property taxes increases to 3%a year while costs go up 3.5 -4%. Over time, property tax
revenues have not kept pace with the costs of maintaining services.SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET
What will the levy fund?FOR . 2"2°
Add 8 police officers to respond emergency to calls and patrol neighborhoods.DATE OF MEETING)
Lt/iS 1a ,A6E/U q
Develop stronger connections to the community, interacting regularly with residents, schools, 1 TEM
businesses to (proactively) address livability concerns.
Maintain higher minimum patrol staffing to provide of faster response times to 911 calls.
Add one school resource officer(SRO)
Increase the number of SRO's from 2 - 3.
Staff 1 SRO at each of the middle schools and the high school for quicker response to safety issues.
Increase SRO presence at school events.
Increase SRO accessibility to students and school staff through more consistent scheduling.
Focus on proactive work with students, school staff and social service providers.
Provide advanced crisis intervention and de-escalation training for all sworn officers.
Develop officers' skills to respond to the increased number of calls involving mental health crisis.
Train officers by providing information, tools and resources to use in interactions with those in crisis.
Provide 4.2 support staff to manage the increased call load and direct resources efficiently.
What did the citywide performance audit say about police operations?
In 2019, an independent auditor conducted a performance audit of city operations.That report recommended
the city hire 8 additional patrol officers and 1 school resource officer to address service demand and comply
with best practices.
What happens if the levy doesn't pass?
The city council has identified increasing patrol staffing as a priority and would explore other funding options as
a citywide fee.
For additional information, including a calculator to see the effect on your property taxes, if passed please visit
www.tigard-or.gov/tigard levy.