Loading...
SDR2014-00003 SDR2O14 - 00003 RETAIL AT SHADY LANE NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2014-00003 111111 RETAIL AT SHADY LANE T I G A R D 120 DAYS = 12/17/2014 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: RETAIL AT SHADY LANE CASE NOS.: Site Development Review(SDR) SDR2014-00003 PROPOSAL: The applicant requests redevelopment of a 0.44 acre parcel located at 9785 SW Shady Lane, formerly used as a gas station and then a playground equipment store. The proposal would remodel the existing building with a small addition for a drive- through coffee shop and associated site improvements. APPLICANT: MAJ Development Corp OWNER: Stanley and Audene Nored c/o Mike Jenkins 511 NEE 21"Place 300 West 15th Street, Suite 200 Canby, OR 97013 Vancouver,WA 98660 APPLICANT'S Mackenzie REP: c/o Ryan Shera 1515 SE Water Avenue, Suite 100 Portland, OR 97214 LOCATION: 9785 SW Shady Lane;Washington County Tax Map 1S135BD,Tax Lot 00200. COMP PLAN DESIGNATION/ ZONE: MUC: mixed use commercial district. The MUC zoning district includes land around the Washington Square Mall and land immediately west of Highway 217. Primary uses permitted include office buildings, retail, and service uses. Also permitted are mixed-use developments and housing at densities of 50 units per acre. Larger buildings are encouraged in this area with parking under, behind or to the sides of buildings. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.630, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the request for Site Development Review (SDR2014-00003) subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section VI of the Decision. NoTic ?or 11 DECISION SDR2014-(NNNl3/Retail at Shady l,anc l'AGI?1 OP 26 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SITE/BUILDING PERMITS: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, alongwith any _supportingdocuments and/or plans that address the followingrequirements to M the COMMUNITY PLANNING DIVISIN, ATTN: GARY PAGENSTECHER 503-718-2434. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 1. Prior to site work, the project arborist shall perform a site inspection for tree protection measures, document compliance/non-compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to the city manager or designee within one week of the site inspection. 2. The project arborist shall perform bimonthly (twice monthly) site inspections for tree protection measures during periods of active site development and construction, document compliance/non- compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to the project planner within one week of the site inspection. 3. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide a tree establishment bond for all trees to be planted per the approved urban forestry plan. The total bond amount shall be equivalent to the city's average cost to plant and maintain a tree per the applicable standards in the Urban Forestry Manual for a period of two years after planting multiplied by the total number of trees to be planted and maintained. 4. Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide a fee to cover the city's cost of collecting and processing the inventory data for the entire urban forestry plan. 5. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing the direction of parking lot traffic flow to maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety such as signage to direct vehicles to drive- through entry and prevent vehicles entering exit lane of drive-through. 6. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit a revised Landscape Plan showing that the L1 and L2 standards are met. In additionpa note shall be placed on the Landscape Plan that calls out the 90% opacity within one year performance requirements for parking lot screening to guide future maintenance. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements for review and- approval to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT,ATTN: Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tigard-or.gov: 7. Prior to issuance of building permits, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover street improvements, public utility issues, and any other work in the public right-of- way. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee". 8. Prior to any work on site, the applicant's engineer shall submit a preliminary access report to City engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and streets to be used by site traffic are safe by meetingadequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by the City and AASHO. 9. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain city approval of plans to construct measures (such as a center island in Shady Lane or raised median in Greenl)urg Road) that physically prohibit left turns from Shady Lane onto Greenburg Road. Signage shall also be provided to reinforce this prohibition. 10. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain city and county approval of plans to construct measures (such as a center island in the frontage road or raised median in Greenburg Road) that physicallyprohibit left turns from the frontage road onto Greenburg Road. Signage shall also be provided to reinforce this prohibition. These items may be provided by another developer, but plans must be approved prior to construction work on this site. 11. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition (and any subsequent versions or updates)." 12. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain all permits and service provider letters necessary from all appropriate agencies (such as Washington County, Tualatin Valley Water Department and Clean Water Services) for all work to be done on site. N( !'ICI?Oh TYPE 11 DECISION S1R21 1 1 41 11 11 11 13/Retail at Shad)•lane 1':AG1:201.26 VP- 13. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain approval from Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. 14. Prior to anyround disturbance on the site the applicant shall obtain a 1200-C General Permit issued by the City f Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act. 15. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain city and CWS approval of plans for the construction of the stormwater treatment facilities. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION: The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, alongwith any supportingdocuments and/or _plans that address the followingrequirements to e COMMUNITY LANNING DIVISIN, ATTN: GARY PAGENSTF CHER 503-718-2434. The cover letter shall clearly identify where in the submittal the required information is found: 16. Prior to final building inspection, the project arborist shall perform a site inspection, document compliance/non-compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval to the city manager or designee. 17. Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall submit a sign permit application for any signs proposed for the development project. 18. Prior to final building inspection, the planning division shall be contacted to conduct an inspection to verify that the proposal was completed in accordance with this decision and the approved plans. 19. Following final building inspection the tree establishment period shall immediately begin and continue for a period of two years. The applicant shall prepare a cover letter and submit it, along with any supporting documents and/or plans that address the following requirements for review and- approval to the ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT,ATTN: Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tigard-or.gov: 20. Prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit, the applicant shall obtain city and CWS approval of the complete construction of the stormwater treatment facilities and maintenance plans. 21. Prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit,the applicant shall obtain city approval of the complete construction of the proposed driveway. The applicant's engineer shall submit a final access report to City engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and streets to be used by site traffic are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by the City and AASHTO. 22. Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit,the applicant shall obtain city approval of constructed measures (such as a center is and in Shady Lane or raised median in Greenburg Road) that physically prohibit left turns from Shady Lane onto Greenburg Road. Signage shall also be provided to reinforce this prohibition. 23. Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit,city and county approval shall be obtained of measures constructed (such as a center island in the frontage road or raised median in Greenburg Road) that physically prohibit left turns from the frontage road onto Greenburg Road. Signage shall also be provided to reinforce this prohibition. These items may be provided by another developer,but must be in place prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. 24. Prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding overhead utilities. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN18)) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. NO17CI.OI+'1TVI?H DI,CISION SDR20I4(KM)03/Retail at Shad}'Lane VAGI:3 OF 26 —w SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The subject .44-acre property is located at the intersection of Highway 217, SW Greenburg Road, and Shady Lane. The property is flat and slopes gently to the southwest. The site has been previously developed with an approximately 2,000 square foot building, a parking area, landscaping, and a canopy over what used to be a ffieling area when the site was used as service station between 1971 and 1988. From 1989, the site had been used for vehicle storage, sales, and rentals. Since 2005 (CUP2005-00002) the site has operated as Rainbow Park and Play, a playground equipment retailer. Proposal Description and Site and Vicinity Information: The applicant requests redevelopment of a 0.44 acre parcel located at 9785 SW Shady Lane, formerly used as a gas station and then a playground equipment store.Re-use of the existing building with a small addition for a drive-through coffee shop and associated site improvements are proposed. The subject property is zoned MUG, as is the abutting property to the north and east and those across SW Shady Lane to the south and Greenburg to the west. Elevated sections of Greenburg and the 217 southbound on-ramp border the site to the west and north. SECTION IV. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS The Tigard Community Development Code requires that roperty owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity for written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision beingmade. The notices were mailed August 21, 2014. One comment was received during the comment period 'from an interested parry, stating that "Nearby Fanno Creek needs a clean-up. This place would make a great green space or park. There are far too many crashes on Greenburg." RESPONSE: These comments are not directly related to the approval criteria. However, the project's impact on traffic safety on Greenburg is addressed by the applicant's Traffic Study and the Development Review Engineer's findings in Section 18.810 of this decision. SECTION V. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections: A. ZoningDistricts 18.5Commercial Zoning Districts 18.630 Washington Square Regional Center Plan District B. Applicable Specific Development Standards 18. 705 Access Egress and-Circulation 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 Landscapingand Screening 18.755 Mixed Soliaste and Recyclable Storage 18.765 Off-Street parking and loading requirements 18.780 Signs 18.790 Uan Forestry 18.795 Visual Clearance C. Land Use Decisions 18.360 Site Development Review D. Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810 E. Decision Making Procedures 18.390 Impact Study N(NoTicNOF1YVNN:11I)NCISION SI)R2014-INIUU3/Retail at Shad) lanc I'NGl;4O126 SECTION VI. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA B. ZONING DISTRICTS Commercial Zoning District (18.520) Lists the description of the Commercial Zoning Districts. The site is located in the MUC: Mixed Use Commercial zoning district. The MUC zoning district includes land around the Washington Square Mall and land immediately west of Highway 217. Primary uses permitted include office buildings, retail, and service uses. Also permitted are mixed-use developments and housing at densities of 50 units per acre. Larger buildings are encouraged in this area with parking under, behind or to the sides of buildings. The site is currently developed with an 1,800 square foot buildingpreviously used for automotive uses and retail sales. The applicant proposes to remodel the building or use as a drive-through coffee shop, classified in 18.130.060.F as an eating and drinking establishment, a use permitted in the MUC zone as shown in Table 18.52.1. Development Standards: Section 18.520.040.A requires all development to comply with the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variance in accordance with Chapter 18.370. The applicable development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in-Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STANDARD MUC Proposed 117] 181 Minimum Lot Size None 0.44 acres - Detached unit - NA - Boarding, lodging,rooming house NA Minimum Lot Width None 106 ft. Minimum Setbacks - Front yard 0 ft. 19 80 ft. - Side facing street on corner& through lots 0 ft.[19] 40 ft. - Side yard 0 ft. 18 ft. - Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district [19][20] NA - Rear yard - 13 ft. - Distance between front of garage & property line abutting a 0 ft. NA public or private street. [19][20] Minimum Building Height 2 stories 1 story Maximum Building Height 200 ft 16 ft. Maximum Site Coverage 85% 68.4 % Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 31.4% Minimum FAR [3] 1.25 .10 [17]Modifications to dimensional and minimum density requirements for developments that include or abut designated Water Resources Overlay District Riparian setbacks per Chapter 18.797 are described in 18.630.040.F. [18]The requirements contained in the Buffer Matrices in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2 shall be used in calculating widths of buffering/screening and required improvement s to be installed between proposed uses in the MUC,MUE and MUR zones within the Washington Square Regional Center(WSRC)and abutting zoning districts not included within the WSRC,or zoning districts within the WSRC which are not mixed-use. For MUC and MUE zones,the requirements for Commercial Zones apply.For MUR zones,the requirements for the Neighborhood Commercial Zone apply. [19] For Commercial and Mixed-use developments,the maximum front and street side yard setback is 10 feet.For Residential only developments, the maximum front and street side yard setback is 20 feet. [20]Side and rear yard setbacks shall be 20 feet when the zone abuts residential districts shown in Section 18.510.020 except R-25 and R-40. FINDING: As shown in the table above, and described in the applicant's narrative and plan set, the proposed re-development of the existing building does not comply with the commercial development standards for the MUC zone. However, as provided in 18.630.030, lawfully established pre-existing developments within the Washington Square Regional Center Plan District Mixed Use Districts are approved developments.Addition, expansion, or enlargement of such structures are subject to substantial compliance with all appropriate development standards in this code, or that the applicant demonstrates that the purposes of applicable N(YI'ICN.OlF 1'1'PI?11 DI X lSION SI)R21114-(Ht 113/Retail at Shady Lane I)\GI,5 01,26 development standards are addressed to the extent that the proposed addition, expansion or enlargement allows. The applicant has not proposed any changes to the lot. Side yard setbacks arereater than 10 feet. The front yard setback is reduced by the drive-through addition (from 85 feet to 80 feet) to be more in compliance. The site coverage has been reduced from 82.7%to 67.6%, also more in compliance with the site coverage standard. The project is in substantial compliance with the applicable commercial development standards. Washington Square Regional Center Plan District (18.630): 18.630.010 Purpose and Applicability C. Development conformance. All new developments, including remodeling and renovation projects resulting in new non-single-family residential uses, are expected to contribute to the character and quality of the area. in addition to meeting the design standards described below and other development standards required by the development and building codes, developments will be required to dedicate and improve public streets, connect toublic facilities such as sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage, and participate in funding future transportation and public improvement projects necessary within the Washington Square Regional Center. 18.630.020 Development Standards A. Compliance required. All development must comply with: 1. All applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapter 18.370 and subsections C through E of this section; 2. All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. B. Development standards. Development standards which apply within mixed-use zones in the Washington Square Regional Center Plan District are contained in Table 18.520.2. Existing developments which do not meet the standards specified for a particular district may continue in existence and be altered subject to the provisions of Section 18.630.030. As noted in the previous section above, the existing developed site does not meet the setback standards in Table 18.520.2,but may be altered subject the following provisions. 18.630.030 Pre-Existing Uses and Developments within the Washington Square Regional Center Plan District Mixed Use Districts A. Applicability. Pre-existing housing units in mixed use districts are permitted. Conversion of pre-existing housing units to other uses is subject to the requirements of this chapter. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 18.760.040, usesrohibited and structures that would be nonconforming in any of the regional center mixed-use zoning districts that were lawfully in existence at the time of adoption of the regional center mixed use districts are considered to be approved uses and structures. However, future additions, expansions, or enlargements to such uses or structures, shall be limited to theproperty area and use lawfully in existence at the time of adoption of this ordinance, February 22,2002. 1. An addition, expansion, or enlargement of such lawfully preexistinguses and structures up to 20% of the gross floor area lawfully in existence at the time of aoption of this ordinance will be allowed provided the applicant of such proposed addition, expansion or enlargement demonstrates substantial compliance with all appropriate development standards in this code, or that the applicant demonstrates that the purposes of applicable development standards are addressed to the extent that the proposed addition, expansion or enlargement allows. The existing development occurred prior to adoption of the Washington Square Regional Center Plan District. The applicant proposes a minor addition of 41 square feet, or 2% of the 2,035 square foot building for a use permitted in the MUC zone. The drive-through window addition extends the buildin to be more in compliance with front and side yard setbacks. Landscaping is increased to 32.4%, which exceeds the minimum 15%. As reviewed below, the proposed re-development is in substantial compliance. 18.630.050 Site Design Standards Compliance. All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one acre or larger a phased development plan may be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010.C.2, governing criteria for granting a variance, is satisfied. A. Building placement on major and minor arterials. 1. Purpose. Architecture helps define the character and quality of a street and can make a strong statement about the overall community and city at large. The placement and design of buildings provides the framework for the streetscape and defines the edges of the public right-of-way. Architecture and ground floor uses can activate the street, either by its design resence or by those who come and go from it. At intersections, investing in building frontages can create gateways and special places that add to the character of the area. N()'11Cl?Ole TYPI?II lll?(;1s1ON SIR20141NKMil/Retail at Shady lane l'\(;k 6 OF 26 2. Standard. Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50% of all street frontages along major and minor arterial streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on major and minor arterial streets. B. Building setback. 1. Purpose. Buildings, and investment in architecture is most conspicuous when it is visible from the street. 1 he presence of buildings closely sited at the edge of the right-of-way creates an envelope for the street and a sense of permanence. 2. Standard. The minimum and maximum building setback from public street rights-of-way shall be in accordance with Table 18.520.2. C. Front yard setback design. 1. Purpose. The front yard is the most conspicuous face of a building and requires special attention. Places for people and pedestrian movement helps create an active and safer street. Higher level oflandscape anticipates a more immediate visual result. 2. Standard. -For setbacks greater than 0 feet, landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path must be provided between a structure and a public street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one street, the required improvements shall be provided on all streets. Landscaping shall be developed to the applicable standard in subsection E of this section. Hard-surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete or modular pavingmaterials. Benches and other street furnishings are encouraged. These areas shacontribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per 18.520.040.B and Table 18.520.2. D. Walkway connection to building entrances. 1. Purpose. As density increases and employee and resident populations increase, it is expected that more people will move between businesses within the WSRC. Provisions should be made to encourage people to walk from business to business, and housing to business rather than use automobiles. 2. Standard. A walkway connection is required between a building's entrance and a public street or accessway. This walkway must be at least six feet wide and be paved with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Building entrances at a corner adjacent to a public street intersection are required. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per 18.520.040. B and Table 18.520.2 E. Parking location and landscape design. 1. Purpose. The emphasis on pedestrian access and a high quality streetscape experience requires that private parking lots that abut public streets should not be the predominant street feature. Where parking does abut public streets, high quality landscaping should screen parking from adjacent pedestrian areas. 2. Standard. Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildin s. When buildings or phases are adjacent to more than one public street, primary street(s) shall be identified by the city where this requirement apphes. In general, streets with higher functional classification will be identified as primary streets unless specific design or access factors favor another street. If located on the side, parking is limited to 50% of the primary street frontage. When abutting public streets, arkin must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 parking lot screen standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 landscaped area is eight feet or is equal to the adjacent building setback,whichever is greater. All other site landscaping shall be landscaped to an L-2 general landscaping standard. The L-1 and L-2 standards are more fully described in Section 18.630.090. The site design standards apply to the proposed redevelopment. However, the location of the existing building precludes meeting these standards. As shown in the applicant's Site Plan (Sheet C2.1) and addressed in the findings in this decision, the applicant has shown substantial compliance by reducing the nonconforming setbacks and meeting the walkway and landscape design standards of the district. The site design standards are substantially met. 18.630.060 Building Design Standards All new buildings constructed in the MUC, MUE and MUR zones within the WSRC shall comply with the followingdesign standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in 18.370.0 .C .2, criteria for granting a variance, is satisfied. The applicant proposes to re-develop an existing building in the MUC zone. Therefore, these standards do not apply. 18.630.070 Signs A. Sign standards. In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.780 of the Development Code the folowing standards shall be met: 1. Zoning district regulations. Residential only developments within the MUC MUE and MUR zones shall meet the sign requirements for the R-40 zone, 18.780.130.B; nonresidential developments within the MUC zone shall meet the sign requirements for the commercial zones, 18.780.130.C; nonresidential development witin the MUE zone NO'1'ICI?OIC 1YYI?II I)I x:lslON SI)R21114-111111(1.3/Retail at Shady Lane Y:'1GI?7 M 26 shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone, 18.780.130.D and nonresidential development within the MUR zones shall meet the sign requirements of the C-N zone, 18.780.130.E. 2. Sign area limits. The maximum sign area limits found in Section 18.780.130 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted. 3. Height limits. The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roofline of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted. 4. Signocation. Freestanding signs within the Washington Square regional center shall not be permitted within required L-1 landscape areas. The applicant states that the existingfreestanding sign structure will be used with a change of copy,which would not require a sign permit. owever the proposed wall sign will be new and will require a sign permit, as conditioned. This standard is met. 18.630.090 Landscaping and Screening Applicable levels. Two levels of landscaping and screeningstandards are applicable. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required anthe depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other subsections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. A.L-1 parking lot screen. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on public streets. The L-1 standard is in addition to other standards in other chapters of this title. The setback shall be a minimum of eight feet between the parking Fot and aublic street. L-1 trees shall be considered parking lot trees and spaced between 30 and 40 feet on center within the setback. All L-1 trees shall be a minimum of 31/2-inch caliper at the time oflanting. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a three-foot high screen and a 90% opacity within one year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two years. B. L-2 general landscapin The L-2 standard applies to all other trees and shrubs required by this chapter and Chapter 18.745 (except those required for the L-1 parking lot screen). For trees and shrubs required by Chapter 18.745, the L-2 standard is an additional standard. All L-2 trees shall be 2'/2-inch caliper at the time of planting. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the required landscaping or screening effect within two years. The applicant's Landscape Plan (Sheet L2.3) shows areas of L1 and L2 landscaping. L1 applies along the Shady Lane frontage. The minimum eight foot landscaped setback isrovided. However the Red Sunset Maple is specified as a 2" caliper tree and should be 3 1". Two rows of-Japanese Holly are shown to meet the three-foot high screen and 90% opacity within one year. L2 landscaping requires 2 1/2" caliper trees where the Plant Material Schedule shows trees specified at 2" caliper. The landscaping and screening standards have not all been met. The applicant shall submit a revised Landscape Plan showing that the L1 and L2 standards are met. In addition a note shall be placed on the Landscape Plan that calls out the performance requirements for parking lot screening to guide future maintenance. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the Washington Square Regional Center Plan District standards have not all been met. However, with the following conditions of approval, these standards can be met. CONDITIONS: • The applicant shall submit a revised Landscape Plan showing that the L1 and L2 standards are met. In addition a note shall be placed on the Landscape Plan that calls out the performance requirements for parking lot screening to guide future maintenance. • Prior to final building inspection, the applicant shall submit a sign permit application for any signs proposed for the development project. No 1'1(;I?OF'1'1"PI.I I I)I CISION SI)R211141XXX13/Retail at Shad) bane 1':1G1?8 OF 26 C. APPLICABLE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Access,Egress and Circulation (18.705): Section 18.705.030.B requires site plans be presented for approval showing how access requirements are to be fulfilled in accordance with this chapter. The application includes a Site Plan (Sheet C2.1) and Utility Plan (Sheet 2.3) for a proposed conversion of a gas station to a drive-through coffee shop. This requirement is met. Section 18.705.030.D states that all vehicular access and egress ... shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. A driveway directly connected to SW Shady Lane will be widened to a 30-foot width to provide access to the site as shown in the Site Plan (Sheet C2.1). This requirement is met. Walkways: 18.705.030(F) requires that on-site pedestrian walkways comply with the following standards: Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall -13e constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; As shown in the applicant's Site Plan (Sheet C2.1), a 6-foot walkway is provided from the building entrance to the sidewalk. The building is not part of a complex. The best route to the subject site from the neighboring office building is along the existing sidewalk along Shady Lane. This requirement is met. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrastingavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width exclusive of-vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; As shown in the applicant's Site Plan (Sheet C2.1), a 6-foot scored concrete walkway is provided from the building entrance to the sidewalk. The drive-through aisle and parking lot crossings are 12 feet and 25 feet respectively. This standard is met. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, etc. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. As shown in the applicant's Site Plan (Sheet C2.1), a 6-foot scored concrete walkway is provided from the building entrance to the sidewalk. This standard is met. In no case shall the design of the service drive or drives require or facilitate the backward movement or other maneuvering ofa vehicle within a street, other than an alley. The applicant's Site Plan (Sheet C2.1) demonstrates that the proposed access drive is designed so that no backup movement is required within the street. This requirement is met. Access Management: Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and/or AASHTO (depending on jurisdiction of facility). An existing driveway widened to a 30-foot width will provide access to the site. The application includes a preliminary sight distance analysis concluding that adequate sight distance is available at the site access. It appears that this standard can be met, but sight distance will need to be verified at final design and after construction to verify that no changes have been made or objects added that would obscure site distance. N(Y1ICI?OFTYPE II DECISION SDR2014-INNNl3/Retail at Shad)Lane PAGE 901,26 Prior to any work on site, the applicant's engineer shall submit a preliminary access report to City engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and streets to be used by site traffic are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by the City and AASIITO. Upon completion of the improvements, the applicant's engineer shall submit a final access report to City engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and streets to be used by site traffic are safe by meetingadequate stackingneeds, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by the City and AASHO. The applicant shall obtain approval of this report prior to final inspection. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage? the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. Greenburg Road is classified as an Arterial in the Tigard Transportation System Plan. The western edge of the driveway is approximately 200 feet from Greenburg Road.-This standard is met. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets alonga collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shalbe 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. SW Shady Lane is classified as a Neighborhood Route in the Tigard Transportation System Plan. The access proposed is an existing access. The standard does not apply. Minimum Access Requirements for Commercial and Industrial Use: Section 18.705.030.) rovides the minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial uses: Table 18.7053pindicates that the required access width for develo ments with fewer than 100 parking spaces is one 30-foot accesses with 24 feet of pavement. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. The proposed widening of the driveway meets the 30-foot access and provides 26 feet of pavement. The edge of the parking lot is 15 feet from the primary building entry. The minimum access requirements are met. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the proposed development meets the applicable Access, Egress and Circulation standards. Environmental performance standards (18.725): These standards require that federal and state environmental laws, rules and re ulations be applied to development within the City of Tigard. Section 18.725.030 (Performance Standards) regulates: Noise,visible emissions,vibration and odors. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.41.130 through 7.40.210 of thgard Mumcipal Code shall apply. Visible Emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point- source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam)which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Odors. The emissions of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at anyoint beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Glare and heat. No direct or sky reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high N(PI'1Cl Ol 1'YPI,II I)lX ISION SI)R21114(HHH13/RctailatShad)'lane 1) G1?11loh26 temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1) there shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2) these regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. FINDING: The proposed eating and drinking establishment use is permitted outright within the MUC zone. Based on the provision of adequate trash and recycling area, and the fact that the proposed use is not likely to generate noise, visible emissions, odors, glare and heat, or harbor insects and rodents, this standard is satisfied. Ongoing maintenance to meet these standards shall be maintained and any violation of these standards will be addressed through the City of Tigard's Code Compliance process. The Environmental Performance Standards are met. Landscaping and Screening (18.745): 18.745.030 General Provisions C. Certificate of occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the requirements of this chapter have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond. A condition of approval has been added requiring the posting of a bond to guarantee the planting and establishment of required trees. The bond must be posted prior to ground disturbance or the issuance of permits. As conditioned, this standard can be met. 18.745.040 Street Trees A. Street Tree Standards. 1. Street trees shall be required as part of the approval process for Conditional Use (Type III), Downtown Design Review (Type II and III), Minor Land Partition (Type II) Planned Development (Type III), Site Development Review (Type II) and Subdivision (Type II and III) permits. This application is being processed as a Type II site development review. Therefore, street trees are required,subject to the following standards. 2. The minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet. When the result is a fraction, the minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by rounding to the nearest whole number. As shown on the Landscape Planting plan (Sheet L2.3), three new street trees spaced variously 18 to 50 feet apart are proposed along a 159.9-foot frontage on SW Shady Lane. In addition, two existing Ash trees are shown to bereserved as street trees. The standard calculation would require a minimum of four street trees��(159.9 feet/40 feet = 3.99 trees). Further, three Katsura trees are shown along the 150-foot frontage of SW Greenburg Road spaced 40 feet apart (150/40= 3.75). The proposed Ash tree on the west end of Shady Lane at Greenburg anchors the Greenburg frontage and provides the 4`h tree as a corner street tree. This standard is met. 3. Street trees required by this section shall be planted according to the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. The application includes the Tree Preservation and Removal Plan (Sheet L2.0), Tree Canopy Site Plan (Sheet L2.1) and the Parking Lot and Street Tree Canopy and Soil Volume Plan (L2.2).Together these plans demonstrate consistency with the street tree planting standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. This requirement is met. 4. Street trees required by this section shall be provided adequate soil volumes according to the Street Tree Soil Volume Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. The application includes the Parking Lot and Street Tree Canopy and Soil Volume Plan (L2.2), which demonstrates consistency with the street tree volume standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. This requirement is met. 5. Street trees required by this section shall be planted within the ri ht of way whenever practicable according to the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. Street NO'I'ICI:OF 1'1'PI?II DECISION SI)R21114111111113/Retail at Shady Lane P:AGI.1101'26 trees may be planted no more than 6 feet from the right of way according to the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual when planting within the right of way is not practicable. As shown on the Landscape Planting plan (Sheet L2.3), the required street trees are proposed on the subject site but within 6 feet of the right-of-way. This standard is met. 6. An existing tree may be used to meet the street tree standards provided that: a. The largest percentage of the tree trunk immediately above the trunk flare or root buttresses is either within the subject site or within the right of way immediately adjacent to the subject site• b. The tree would be permitted as a street tree according to the Street Tree Planting and Soil Volume Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual if it were newly planted; and c. The tree is shown as preserved in the Tree Preservation and Removal site plan (per 18.790.030.A.2), Tree Canopy Cover site plan (per 18.790.030.A.3) and Supplemental Report (per 18.790.030.A.4) of a concurrent urban forestry plan and is eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. The existing trees are within 6 feet of the Shady Lane right of way. The trees would be permitted as street trees as shown on the Parking Lot and Street Tree Canopy and Soil Volume Plan (L2.2), The two existing trees are shown as preserved on the Tree Preservation and Removal Plan. This standard is met. 7. In cases where it is not practicable to provide the minimum number of required street trees, the Director may allow the applicant to remit payment into the Urban Forestry Fund for tree planting and early establishment in an amount equivalent to the City's cost to plant and maintain a street tree for three (3) years (per the Street Tree Planting Standards in the Urban Forestry Manual) for each tree below the minimum required. The applicant proposes providing the required street trees. This standard does not apply. 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening A. General provisions. 2. Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening, shall be required as specified in the matrix. The proposed commercial eating and drinking establishment use is next to an existing commercial office building to the east. No buffering or screening is required per Table 18.745.1.This standard is met. Screening�: Special Provisions: Section 18.745.050.E requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. All parking areas, includin parkin spaces and aisles, shall be required to achieve at least 30% tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the parking area in accordance with the parking lot tree canopy standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. As shown in the Landscaping Plan (Sheet L2.3) the proposed 16-space parking lot is screened by the proposed building and perimeter landscapingwith a combination of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. The Parking Lot and Street Tree Canopy and SoVolume Plan (L2.2), shows four (4) Sunset Maple trees with mature tree canopy area directly over the parking lot of 2,632 square feet. The parking lot total is 6,427 square feet, resulting in a 40.9% canopy coverage, which meets the 30% minimum canopy cover for commercial zones.These standards are met. Screening of Service Facilities. Except for one-family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area; The applicant's narrative states that outside of the refuse disposal area (addressed below), there are no other service facilities that would be visible from the public streets or parking areas. This standard is met. Screeningof Refuse Containers. Except r one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which N(YI1CI?oh"1'1'li Il DrcisiON SI)R2014-O(X)13/Retail at Shady lane AG1:12 Oh 26 would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. As shown in the Trash/Site Plan the 10 foot by 20-foot trash enclosure is contained by a 6-foot high CMU wall with opaque metal gates. This standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the landscaping and screening standards are met. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage (18.755): Chapter 18.755 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclables prior to pick- up and removal by haulers. The applicant must choose one (1) of the following four (4) methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan, or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign-Off. The applicant will have to submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. The applicant chose the minimum standards method to demonstrate compliance with these standards and provides evidence in the narrative and plan set that the proposal meets the minimum 30 square foot requirement with a 200 square foot trash enclosure. This standardpis met. Location Standards. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclables shall be co-located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste; Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with Uniform Building and Fire Code requirements; Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations; Exterior storage areas can be Located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a yard adjacent to a public or private street; Exterior store areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users; Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in 18.755.050 C, design standards; The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. As shown on the applicant's Site Plan (Sheet C2.1), the refuse enclosure is accessed from the parking lot and is visible in order to enhance security for users. The proposed refuse enclosure will not occupy any required parking stalls and adequate screeningwill be achieved through a combination of screening walls and landscapin (Sheet L2.3). The proposed loction is setback 5 feet from the east property boundary and 70 feet from the Shady Lane front lotline. The side yard setback is 0 feet and the front yard setback is a minimum of 0 feet with a 10-foot maximum. The location is not within a required setback. However, it is located in a yard adjacent to a public street. Staff, the applicant's architect, and Pride Disposal spent considerable time exploring alternatives to meet the standard. The proposed location meets the applicant's functional needs and Pride Disposal's service and access requirements. Given the nature of the existing development,the location is in substantial compliance.This standard is met. Design Standards. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection; Storage containers shall meet Uniform Fire Code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area; Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuringfence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and hauers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of beingsecured in a closed and open position; Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearlylabeled to inicate the type of materials accepted. As shown on the applicant's Site Plan (Sheet C2.1), and identified in the Pride servicerovider letter dated May 12, 2014, the proposed storage area substantiallymeets the design criteria. The Pride letter does identify specific design features that are shown on the Trash ite Plan. The design standards are met. Access Standards. The storage area shall be accessible to users at convenient times of the day, and to collection service personnel-on the day and approximate time they are scheduled to provide collection service; storage areas shall be designed to be easily accessible to collection trucks and equipment, considering No icE OF 01*MTH 11 DI(:ISION SI)1220140(N103/Retail at Shady Lane 1), Gk 13 01,26 paving grade and vehicle access; a minimum of 10 feet horizontal clearance and eight feet of vertical clearance is required if the storage area is covered; storage areas shall be accessible to collection vehicles without requiring backing out of a driveway onto a public street. As shown on the applicant's Site Plan (Sheet C2.1) and Trash/Site Plan, and identified in the Pride service provider letter dated May 5, 2014, the proposed storage area is accessible for pick up by Pride Disposal. The access standards are met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above the applicant has provided evidence of compliance with the Mixed Solid Waste and Recycjables Storage standards. These standards are met. Off-Street Parkingand Loading (18.765): Location of vehice parking: Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwellings. Off-street parking lots fr uses not listed above shall be located not further than 500 feet from the buildingor use that they are required to serve, measured in a straight line from the building with the foowing exceptions: a) commercial and industrial uses which require more than 40 parkin spaces may provide for the spaces in excess of the required first 40 spaces up to a distance of 3-00 feet rom the primary site; The 40 parking spaces which remain on the primary site must be available for users in the following order of priority: 1) Disabled-accessible spaces; 2) Short-term spaces; 3) Long-term preferential carpool and vanpool spaces; 4) Long-term spaces. The proposed 16 surface parking spaces are located adjacent and within 500 feet of the existing building. One of fhe spaces is ADA accessible with the remaining being short-term spaces. The locational standards are met. Joint Parking. Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same farking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, subject to the ollowing: 1) The size of the joint parking facility shall be at least as large as the number of vehicle parking spaces required by the larger(est) use per Section 18.765.070; 2) Satisfactory legal evidence shall be presented to the Director in the form of deeds, leases or contracts to establish the joint use; 3) If aoint use arrangement is subsequently terminated, or if the uses change, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each separately. joint parking is not proposed with this application; therefore this standard is not applicable. Disabled-Accessible Parking. All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the State of Oregon Uniform Building Code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. The applicant's Site Plan (Sheet C2.1) shows there is one ADA handicapspace provided. According to ORS 447.233, incorporated through reference to the International Building Cde (IBC), 1 space is required for less than 25 spaces. Final determination of the number of required ADA spaces will be made by the building official during the review of the building permit application. This standardismet. General Design Standards Access Drives: With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: access drives from the street to off- streetparking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; the number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter, 18.705, Access, Egress and fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied-by service drives; access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795,Visual Clearance; access drives shall be improved with an asphalt or concrete surface; and excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by Subsection 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way will be required. The proposed access drive is consistent with the number (1) and size (30 feet/24 feet between curbs) required in Chapter 18.705, is clearly marked, and provides ample room to facilitate a forward entrance onto the public street. Visual clearance areas are shown on the applicant's Landscape Plan (Sheet L2.3)). The access drive standards are met. On-site vehicle stacking for drive-in use. All uses providing drive-in services as defined by this title shall provide on the same site a stacking lne for inbound vehicles as noted in Table 18.765.1. NO"1'ICI?OI 'I'V'1'I:II DI.CISION SI)R2014-UINN13/Retail at Shady lane I)\GI?1401,26 Table 18.765.1 requires a 200-foot stacking lane for drive-in restaurants. TDC 18.120.030(73) defines "Drive-through facility" as a facility or structure that is designed and intended to allow drivers to remain in their vehicles before and during participation in an activity on the site. The proposed addition to the existing building is for the purposes of adding a drive-through window for the anticipated coffee shop use. As shown on the Site Plan (Sheet C2.1) a 200-foot stacking lane is provided. This standard is met. Pedestrian Access: Pedestrian access through parkinglots shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other veicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Pedestrian access through parking lots is addressed in findings for Section 18.705.030.F. There are no drop-off grade separated areas within the parking area. This standards is met. Parking Lot Striping: Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this Chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and all interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. The Site Plan (Sheet C2.1) shows the parking spaces will be clearly marked with striping. Directional arrows or other directional signage does not appear to address the cross traffic that can be anticipated between queue entering and queue exiting cars. The parking lot striping standards are not met. A condition shall require the applicant to submit a revised site plan showing the direction of parking lot traffic flow to maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. Parking lot landscaping. Parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.745. The applicant's Landscape Plan (Sheet L2.3) shows landscaping required by Chapter 18.745 and additionally by Chapter 18.630 for the Washington Square Regional Center Plan. This standard is met. Parking space surfacing. Except for single-famiy and duplex residences, and for temporary uses or fleet storage areas as authorized in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this subsection H, all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt, concrete, or pervious paving surfaces. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well- drained. The proposed re-development of the existing building and parking lot includes demolition of an existing canopy from the prior gas station use and a net reduction in paving of approximately 4,000 square feet (Sheet C1.0). The parking and drive aisles are shown to be paved. This standard is met. Wheel Stops: Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. The applicant's Site Plan (Sheet C2.1) shows that parking spaces will contain a curbed wheel stop or have designated overhang space. The parking proposed along the eastern boundary shows three spaces without wheel stops to accommodate refuse collection from the adjacent trash enclosure as determined by the siting and servicing discussions between the applicant and Pride Disposal. The site's landscaping is well in excess of the 15% minimum, so overhang parking for these three spaces will meet the standard. This standard is met. Space and Aisle Dimensions: Section 18.765.040.N states that: "except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2 the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: 8.5 feet x 18.5 feet for a standard space and 7.5 feet x 16.5 feet for a compact space"; aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width. No more than 50% of the required spaces may be compact spaces. The Site Plan (Sheet C2.1) shows 15 standard spaces measuringat least 8.5 feet feet by 18.5 feet and one ADA compliant space. Aisles are 26 feet in width. The space anaisle dimensions standards are met. N( OIC 1YPI?Il I)I..(;ISION S1)R2U14-001R13/Retail at Shady lane InG1?15 OF 26 Bicycle Parking Location and Access: Section 18.765.050.A states bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street directional signs shall be used to locate the parking area; and bicycle parking may be located inside a builng on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. As shown in the applicant's Site Plan (Sheet C2.1), two bicycle spaces are provided within 30 feet of the primary entrances to the building. This standard is met. Covered Parking Spaces: When possible, bicycle parking facilities should be provided under cover. Required bicycle parking for uses served by a parking structure must provide for covered bicycle parking unless the structure will be more than 100 feet from the primary entrance to the building, in which case, the uncovered bicycle parking may be provided closer to the building entrance. According to the applicant's site plan (Sheet C2.1) the two parking spaces are not covered. Although covered parking is encouraged,it is not required. This standard is met. Bicycle ParkingDesign Requirements: Section 18.76550 .C. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall-ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and when covered,with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; and areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be Clea ly reservedforbicyclearlcing only. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall-be surfaced with a hard surfaced material-,i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete or similar material. This surface must be designed to remain well drained. According to the applicant's site plan (Sheet C2.1) the two parking spaces in the outdoor plaza area meet the applicable design standards. These standards are met. Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements: The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.765.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. According to Table 18.765.2 of the Tigard Development Code, the minimum bicycle-parking requirement for an eating and drinking establishment use is 1.0 space per 1,000 gross square feet. Based on the proposed 2,056 square foot building, a minimum of 2 bicycle parking spaces is required. The proposed Site Plan (Sheet C2.1) shows 2 bike parking spaces. This standard is met. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.765.070.H states that the minimum and maximum parking shall be as required in Table 18.765.2. As shown on the Site Plan (Sheet C2.1), there are 16 total parking stalls provided on-site with one being ADA accessible. The proposed parking would be sufficient to meet the minimum requirements for the proposed use (2,056 sf. x 7.0 spaces/1000 sf. = 14.39 spaces). This standard is met. Off-Street Loading Spaces: Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. The proposed building will be 2,056 square feet. Therefore this standard does not apply. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the off-street parking standards have not been fully met; however,with compliance with the following condition,these standards can be met. N(YITCI;OI,'ll'VI?II I)l;CISION SIR2111¢1NNN)3/RctailatShad)Lane }'AGI?160126 CONDITION: • The applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing the direction of parking lot traffic flow to maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety such as signage to direct vehicles to drive-through entry and prevent vehicles entering exit lane of drive-through. Urban Forestry Plan (18.790): 18.790.030 Urban Forestry Plan Requirements A. Urban Forestry Plan Requirements.An urban forestry plan shall: 1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (theproject landscape architect) or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor the project arborist), except for Minor Land Partitions that can demonstrate compliance with of ective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; 2. Meet the Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; 3. Meet the Tree Canopy Site Plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; and 4. Meet the Supplemental Report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. The application includes the Tree Preservation and Removal Plan (Sheet L2.0), Tree Canopy Site Plan (Sheet L2.1) and the Parking Lot and Street Tree Canopy and Soil Volume Plan (L2.2). The applicant did not submit a supplemental arborist report but has included the required information on the plan sheets, which have been prepared by a registered Landscape Architect. As demonstrated in these plans, the urban forestry plan requirements are met. 18.790.060 Urban Forestry Plan Implementation A. General Provisions. An urban forestry plan shall be in effect from the point of land use approval until the director determines all applicable urban forestry plan conditions of approval and code requirements have been met. For subdivisions and partitions, the urban forestry plan shall remain in effect for each resulting lot or tract separately until the director determines all applicable urban forestry plan conditions of approval and code requirements have been met. Prior and subsequent permitting decisions regarding the planting, maintenance, removal and replacement of trees when not associated with one of the land use review types in Section 18.790.020.A shall be administered through Title 8 (Urban Forestry) of the TigardMunicipal Code. Procedures for ensuring compliance with the urban forestry plan and supplemental report is set forth in Sectionll (Urban Forestry Plan Implementation Standards) of the Urban Forestry Manual. Compliance Section 11 will be ensured through conditions of approval, as discussed below. B. Inspections. Implementation of the urban forestry plan shall be inspected, documented and reported by the project arborist or landscape architect whenever an urban forestry plan is in effect. In addition, no person may refuse entry or access to the director for the purpose of monitoring the urban forestry plan on any site with an effective urban forestry plan. The Inspection Requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual shall apply to sites with an effective urban forestry plan. Inspection requirements are set forth in Part 1 of Section 11 of the Urban Forestry Manual. In order to ensure compliance with inspection requirements during all site development and building permit phases of this subdivision application the applicant shall be subject to conditions of approval consistent with the procedures and timing set forth in Part 1 of Section 11 of the Urban Forestry Manual. As conditioned, this standard will be met. C. Tree Establishment. The establishment of all trees shown to be planted in the Tree Canopy Site Plan (per 18.790.030.A.3) and Supplemental Report (per 18.790.030.A.4) of a previously approved urban forestry plan shall he guaranteed and required according to the Tree Establishment Requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual. Tree establishment requirements are set forth in Part 2 of Section 11 of the Urban Forestry Manual. In order to ensure compliance with tree establishment requirements throughout all stages of the site development and building process, conditions of approval are being applied consistent with the procedures and timing set forth in Part 2 of Section 1T of the Urban Forestry Manual. As conditioned, this standard will be met. D. Urban Forest Inventory. Spatial and species specific data shall be collected according to the Urban Forestry Inventory Requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual for each open grown tree NO'I'1CI:OI 1yPi:II DI?CISION S1)122014-00001/12c tail at Shad)Lane PAGI?17 OI+26 and area of stand grown trees in the Tree Canopy Site Plan (per 18.790.030.A.3) and Supplemental Report (per 18.790.030.A.4) of a previously approved urban forestry plan. Urban Forest Inventory requirements are set forth in Part 3 of Section 11 of the Urban Forestry Manual. In order to ensure compliance with inventory requirements throughout all stages of the site development and building process, conditions of approval are being applied consistent with the procedures and timing set forth in Part 3 of Section 11 of the Urban ForestryJVIanual. As conditioned, this standard will be met. FINDING: As shown in the analysis above, the applicable provisions of the Urban Forestry Plan have been met. Plan implementation will be ensured through the following conditions of approval. CONDITIONS: • Prior to site work, the project arborist shall perform a site inspection for tree protection measures, document compliance/non-compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to the city manager or designee within one week of the site inspection. • The project arborist shall perform bimonthly (twice monthly) site inspections for tree protection measures during periods of active site development and construction, document compliance/non-compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval directly to the project planner within one week of the site inspection. • Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide a tree establishment bond for all trees to be planted per the approved urban forestry plan. The total bond amount shall be equivalent to the city's average cost to plant and maintain a tree per the applicable standards in the Urban Forestry Manual for a period of two years after planting multiplied by the total number of trees to be planted and maintained. • Prior to site work, the applicant shall provide a fee to cover the city's cost of collecting and processing the inventory data for the entire urban forestry plan. • Prior to final building inspection, the project arborist shall perform a site inspection, document compliance/non-compliance with the urban forestry plan and send written verification with a signature of approval to the city manager or designee. • Following final building inspection the tree establishment period shall immediately begin and continue for a period of two years. Visual Clearance Areas (18.795): Chapter 18.795 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersectingright-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shalcontain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceedingthree (3) feet in height. -The code provides that obstructions that may be located in this area shall-be visuallyclear between three (3) and eight (8) feet in height (8) (trees may be placed within this area provided that all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway, and then connecting these two (2), 30-foot distance points with a straight line. FINDING: The applicant has indicated in the narrative and shown on the Landscape Plan (Sheet L2.3) that a clear vision area will be maintained between 3 and 8 feet in height at the vehicular access of the property. This standard is met. No'17Ci:OI.'I'YPI?Il ll1:C!SION SI)R21114-00 03/Rctailat Shad) lane I)\(3N 18OI+26 D. SPECIFIC SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL STANDARDS Section 18.360.090.A through 18.360.090.N provides additional Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These additional standards are addressed immediately below with the following exceptions: The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of the following and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards: C. Exterior elevations,E. Private outdoor area—Multifamily use, F. Shared outdoor recreation areas—Multifamily use, and G. Development for a nonresidential use adjacent to the 100- year floodplain. The following sections were discussed elsewhere in this decision and, therefore, are not addressed again in this section: K. Landscaping,L. Drainage, and M. Provision for the disabled. A. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title, including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; The findings in this decision provide basis for compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title,including Chapter 18.810. This standard is met. B. Relationship to the natural and physical environment—Nonresidential development. 1. Buildings shall be: a. Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; b. Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; c. Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire-fighting; and d. Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. The subject site is level, fullydeveloped, and surrounded on three sides by roads. The proposed re- development of the site and existing building preclude siting options with respect to the items listed. This standard is met 2. Innovative methods and techniques to reduce impacts to site hydrology and fish and wildlife habitat shall be considered based on surface water drainage patterns identified per Section 18.810.100.A.3 and the City of Tigard "Significant Habitat Areas lap." Methods and techniques for consideration may include, but are not limited to the following: a. Water quality facilities (for infiltration, retention, detention and/or treatment); b. Pervious pavement; c. Soil amendment; d. Roof runoff controls; e. Fencing to guide animals toward safe passageways; f. Re-directed outdoor lighting to reduce spill-off into habitat areas; g. Preservation of existing vegetative and canopy cover. The proposed re-development provides limited opportunities for reducing impacts to site hydrology, but does include water quality catch basins for storm water treatment, overall reduction in impervious surfaces from 82% to 68%, and planting street and parking lot trees to increase vegetative cover. This standard is met. D. Buffering, screeningand compatibility between adjoininguses—Nonresidential development. 1. Nonresidential evelopment shall provide bufferingbetween different types of landpuses— for example between commercial and industriauses and residential and commercial uses—and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: a. The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution, filter dust or to provide a visual barrier; b. The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height; c. The direction(s) from which buffering is needed; d. The required density of the buffering; and e. Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. The proposed re-development of an existing commercial building is compatible with the adjacent commercial office building. Buffering is not required. 2. On-site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas storage areas, parkinglots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shabe provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy ofthe type and extent of the screening: N()!!CI ()I !'\I'K II I) C1SION SI)R21114110003/RetailatShady lane P,AGI.190126 a. What needs to be screened; b. The direction from which it is needed; c. How dense the screen needs to be; d. Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile; and e. Whether the screening needs to be year around. Screening of utilities and parking areas is addressed in the findings for Chapter 18.745. This standard is met. H. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention—Nonresidential development. 1. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or publicathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility,. and 2. These areas may be defined by,but not imited to: a. A deck,patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine, b.A trellis or aror , c.A change in elevation or grade, d. A change in the texture of the path material, e. Sign or f. Landscaping. The site is designed for public access which is clearly defined by the parking lot, drive-through, and 18' x 47' foot plaza fronting the building. The Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. This standard is met. I. Crime prevention and safety—Nonresidential development. 1. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; 2. Interior service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; 3. Mailboxes shall be located in lighted areas havingvehicular or pedestrian traffic; 4. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime; and 5. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abruptrade changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven eet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. The proposed re-development of the existing building includes windows and doors on three sides of the building limiting areas that may be vulnerable to crime. Outdoor lighting of the site is provided by two pole lights,building lighting and existing right of way lighting on SW Shady Lane. This standard is met. J. Public transit. 1. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route; 2. The requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: a. The location of other transit facilities in the area, and b. The size and type of the proposal; 3. The following facilities may be required after city and Tri-Met review: a. Bus stop shelters, b. Turnouts for buses, and c. Connecting paths to the shelters. Existing bus stops for bus lines 76 and 78 are within 400 feet of the subject site on SW GreenburgRoad. However, the proposal's impact is not significantly different than the prior use (Transportationmpact Analysis) and, therefore,would not warrant public transit improvements. This standard is met. N. All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title; e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350, or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. The applicant has not requested planned development review or any variances or adjustments. Therefore, all of the provisions and regulations fo the underlying zone shall apply. As shown in the findings for this decision, all of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone have been met or are otherwise conditioned.This standard is met. FINDING: Based on the analysis above, the applicable Specific Site Development Review Approval Standards are met. NO'17CI '1'1'I'I?II l)l?(;1s1ON NN13/Retail at Shad)Lane 1)1GI?2t)OF 2( E. STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets,sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street widthlanned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.620.080.A, Tigard Triangle Street and Accessway Standards, requires a Neighborhood Route street to have a 60-foot right-of-way width and 36-foot paved section. Other improvements required may include on-street parking, sidewalks and bikeways,underground utilities,street lighting,storm drainage, and street trees. No streets within the development are proposed. SW Shady Lane is a Neighborhood Route improved with an existing 8-foot sidewalk within a 60-foot right-of- way. This standard is met. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.630.040 and 18.810.030.H.1 state that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required. Exceptions can be made where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing_ developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Additional street connections in this area are precluded by Highway 217 to the north, Greenburg Road to the west, and existing development on adjacent property to the east. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments withrades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. The existing grades along the Shady Lane frontage are less than 10%. No grade changes are proposed to these streets. This standard is met. Traffic Study: Section 18.810.030.CC requires a traffic study for development proposals meeting certain criteria. The application includes a June 4, 2014, traffic study with July 1, 2014 supplement prepared by Brent Ahrend, P.E. of Group Mackenzie evaluating the intersection of SW Greenburg Road and Shady Lane and the site access at Shady Lane. The study found that the westbound left turn movement from Shady Lane to Greenburg Road currently experiences delays and a Level-of-Service (LOS) F. These delays are calculated to increase significantly with the addition of site trips, especially in the busier AM peak hour, when the left turn volume is calculated to approach capacity. Observations of the existing left turn movements noted that, in current traffic conditions, traffic queues from nearby signalized intersections regularly extend across the intersection of Greenburg Road with Shady Lane. These issues —the long delays faced by left-turners, the scarcity of gaps for making left turns, and that they would often be crossing through queues of waiting traffic — raise concerns about public safety at this location if the proposed development is constructed and these concerns are not mitigated. As each of these issues involves traffic turning left from Shady Lane onto Greenburg Road or turning left from the frontage road (opposite Shady Lane) onto Greenburg Road, these issues can be mitigated by prohibiting these left turns. N(Yrici omw 11 1)1?CISION SDR21114-1N111113/Retail at Shad)Lane P\GIS 21()1'26 The initial traffic study was prepared with the assumption that another development northwest of Greenburg Road will be constructing a `pork-chop' center island in the frontage road opposite Shady Lane that will physically prohibit straight-across and left-turning movements from the frontage road. This change is anticipated to improve traffic flow at this intersection. Based on review of the observations and calculations provided in this supplemental analysis, the need for these turn restrictions would exist if the Shady Ln retail development is constructed but the iFly development is not constructed. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain city approval of plans to construct measures (such as a center island in Shady Lane or raised median in Greenburg Road) that physically prohibit left turns from Shady Lane onto Greenburg Road. Signage shall also be provided to reinforce this prohibition. Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit, the applicant shall obtain city approval of constructed measures (such as a center island in Shady Lane or raised median in Greenburg Road) that physically prohibit left turns from Shady Lane onto Greenburg Road. Signage shall also be provided to reinforce this prohibition. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain city and county approval of plans to construct measures (such as a center island in the frontage road or raised median in Greenburg Road) that physically prohibit left turns from the frontage road onto Greenburg Road. Signage shall also be provided to reinforce this prohibition. These items may be provided by another developer, but plans must be approved prior to construction work on this site. Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit, city and county approval shall be obtained of measures constructed (such as a center island in the frontage road or raised median in Greenburg Road) that physically prohibit left turns from the frontage road onto Greenburg Road. Signage shall also be provided to reinforce this prohibition. These items may be provided by another developer, but must be in place prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. This standard can be met by condition. Easements: Section 18.810.050 states that easements for sewers, drainage,water mains, electric lines, or other public utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions, and where a development is traversed by a watercourse or drainageway, there shall be provided a stormwater easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of the watercourse. Section 18.810.050.B states that a property owner proposinga development shall make arrangements with the city, the applicable district, and eacutility franchise for the provision and dedication of utility easements necessary to provide full services to the development. The city's standard width for mainline easements shall be 15 feet unless otherwise specified by the utility company, applicable district, or city engineer. The site is fully served by existing utilities. No easements are required. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards and be located on both sides of arterial, collector and local residential streets. Private streets and industrial streets shall have sidewalks on at least one side. An 8-foot wide sidewalk is along the SW Greenburg Road and Shady Lane frontages. This standard is met. Section 18.810.070.B states that if there is an existing sidewalk on the same side of the street as the development within 300 feet in either direction, the sidewalk shall be extended from the site to meet the existing sidewalk, subject to rough proportionality. An existing sidewalk is along the SW Greenburg Road and Shady Lane frontages of the entire block. No additional sidewalks are required. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted N(YI7CI.OI 1\I'I?IIDIusiON SIR21114-(HHNI3/RetailatShad) 1,ane 1':AGI?2201.26 policies of the comprehensive plan. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. An existing sewer will continue to serve the site. No other sewer or sewer extension is required. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. The site will continue to drain to catch basins at the southeast and southwest corner of the parking lot and directly discharge to the storm drain in SW Shady Lane. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There is no upstream drainage. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development unt provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). The impervious area of the site will be reduced from 83% to 69% so provision for additional runoff is not required. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the under round services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-groundingin conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. he most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under- grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the opposite side of SW Shady Lane. Payment of a fee in- lieu of undergrounding the utilities is required and estimated at $5,600. ADDITIONAL CITY AND/OR AGENCY CONCERNS WITH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS: NO17CI?()I,"1YPI?11 1)1?C1510N SI)R21114-(NIIX)3/Retail at Shady Lane 1' GI?23 OF 26 Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 07-20) which require the construction of on-site water quahty facilities. The facilities shall be designed in accordance with the CWS Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Management and shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The two existing catch basins are proposed to be replaced with Contech Storm Filter Catch Basins to meet the water quality standards for a redeveloped site. In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces of more than 1,000 s uare feet provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention, but a fee-in-lieu would be required. The impervious area of the site will be reduced from 83% to 69% so detention is not required. Fire and Life Safety: The applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) for access and hydrant location prior to any work on site. Public Water System: Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) provides service in this area. The application includes a service provider letter from"IVWD stating that adequate capacity is available to provide service to the proposed development. Prior to any work on site the applicant shall provide documented approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District (I'VWD) of the design of water service to the site. TVWD approval of construction shall be obtained prior to final inspection. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The applicant shall meet the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act regarding National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permits that may be needed for this project. The applicant shall follow all applicable requirements regarding erosion control, particularly those of the Federal-Clean Water Act, State of Oregon, Clean Water-Services, and City of Tigard including obtaining and abiding by the conditions of NPDES 1200-C or 1200-C-N permits as applicable. From the size of the anticipate disturbed area,it appears that a 1200-C will be necessary. Site Permit Required: The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.) and driveway construction. This permit shall be obtained prior to any work on site and prior to issuance of the building permit. F. IMPACT STUDY Section 18.360.090 states, "The Director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions or denying an application:" Section 18.390.040 states that the applicant shall provide an impact study to quantify the effect of development on public facilities and services. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standard, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. O 1\PI?II ll1.CISION SUR2U14-UIH 113/Retail at Shade Lan( P\GI?24 OF 26 In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that supports that the real property dedication is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. The applicant has provided an impact study addressing the project's impacts on public systems. The City's Development Review Engineer has determined that Shady Lane is built to standard and that no other dedication is required for it or other adjacent streets. The Transportation Development Tax (TDT) is a mitigation measure required for new development and will be paid at the time of building permits. Based on Washington County implementation figures for 2014/2015, TDTs are expected to recapture approximately 27.0 percent of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Based on the proposed eating and drinking establishment use, the applicant is required to pay estimated TDT's of approximately $9,455. Final TDT payment will be assessed at time of building permit submittal. Based on the estimate that total TDT fees cover 27.0 percent of the impact on major street improvements citywide, a fee that would cover 100 percent of this project's traffic impact is $35,018, of which $25,563 is unmitigated impact. The difference between the TDT paid and the full impact, is considered as unmitigated impact. Estimated Value of Impacts Full Impact $35,018 Less TDT Assessment - 9,455 Left Turn Prohibition Mitigation Measures 8,000 Estimated Value of Unmitigated Impacts $17,563 FINDING: As shown in the above calculation, the estimated cost of public facility improvements and TDT is approximately one half the full impact of the development, which is, therefore, roughly proportional. SECTION VII. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Tigard Development Review Engineer has provided comments on street and utility issues, which have been incorporated into the findings of this decision under Chapters 18.630, 18.705 and 18.810 and are also included as an attachment to this decision (Exhibit C). The Tigard Building Official commented that building code issues will be addressed at the time of building plans review. The Tigard Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal but did not provide comment. The Tigard Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objection to it. SECTION VIII. AGENCY COMMENTS Washington County and ODOT were notified of the subject proposal but did not comment. Clean Water Services has reviewed the proposal and provided a general comment letter dated September 4, 2014 requiring storm water connection permit authorization prior to any work on site addressing sanitary sewer, storm drainage and water quality, sensitive areas, and erosion control issues. These issues are addressed within the body of the application and reviewed in this decision under the applicable standards of the Street and Utility Improvement section. In addition, CWS issued a Service Provider Letter (14-000994) which found that the project will not significantly impact sensitive areas found near the site. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R), John Wolf (503-259-1504), commented that Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue approves the proposal. NO1iCI?OF"IYPI?11I)FCISION SI)R2014(1(NN13/Retail at Shady lane 1':AGI?25OF26 Exhibits: Exhibit A: Vicinity Map Exhibit B: Site Plan Exhibit C: Development Review Engineering Memo, dated October 27,2014 SECTION IX. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON OCTOBER 29,2014 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 18,2014 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appt& The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.6.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 4:00 PM ON NOVEMBER 17,2014. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. �'�-� October 29,2014 PREPARED By; / G4 Pagenstecher DATE Associate Planner "_ .-/-7/1 % l?� October 29, 2014 APPROVED BY: Tom c uire DATE Assistant Community Development Director \curpin\),an'\site development review\sdr21114 1HHH)3(Retail at Shady Lane)\sdr2014-IHH$3 decision.doc NOTICE O1,"1i]'I?IIDECISION SI)R2014-01H at Shady Lanc l'AO 26Ol 26 '414N VICINITY MAP ,4400001,.,..,, 0AK S SDR2014-00003 9600 Retail at Shady Lane 9600 9600 Coffee Shop Drive-Through 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 10645 9600 Subject Site i.-:-'.:.1 10655 1 q T cm 10763 0 '° _`� •,'�.. I�.' 10763 J4 tr s 10763 Q� A.� -- -''y .■■�■■■ 9735 9735 1 it__ 10765 �i a�I••■■■ 9735 9735 . ;if �' 4 /■■■I•■■■ [` Q- 40.0••••• 9735 9735 10850 0 111111■■■I•MEN ...■■■■■. 9735 9735 7, MNII■■■ � I1IMMI 10775 SHADY LN 98009802 8 00 Information on this map is for general location 98 02 he 9 804 97 80 onDeve Development Serand should be vices s Div sion. 9780 9770 9730 Approx.Scale 1:2.000-1 In=16/ft 9780 Map pnnted at 08:00 AM on 18-Oct-14 9780 DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD MAKES NO WARRANTY REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE 10830 10855 THE DATA PROVI ED!l'ETRIEIL IV CITY OF TIGARD SHALLOASSUME FNO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HCW CAUSED. .— _. 10875 .. City of Tigard - p 13125 SW Hall Blvd — C Feet 2Ec °'1895 TIGAR mr Tigard,OR 97223 1 ' •53 — l www.tigard-or.gov TIGARD 9655 M . / Architecture•Interiors / KEYNOTES o--- / 1. INSTALL CITY 6 TIGARD 0012&6CIAL DRIVEWAY PeftwLOR 2. /MULL 1NASCAPMO 9590 / - MmwCYn 1 INSTALL TRASH ENCLOSURE SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS NNIN5.AA • / • EJOSTMG SI.TO REM.MO BE REBRANDEDAmoy WA 2 S MATCH IDOSTMG MENAA TN.99D / .•1rA11d9¢.min -`�.- 6. NOT U3D j r. REFACE EXISTING DRIVEWAY WITH CON0ETE 606025 MACKENZIE. - - INSTALL 2'CUB BREAK ............ ,•--_ (� 9.fl INSTAL_ADA COMPLIANT RNP 614)OEY�d1BR OOP. Q�2` / /. - to MTALL ADA C0MMA.CORNEA RAMP SUIW�r NTH STREET QUITE 200 CT / tt. INSTALL ADA Sw 1/ANC0EABE WA 19000 .� __-ami nmrnd chi rr �Y13 12 CORM,Crt055 WAX J.V' / / 0 4.. _ tx EXISTING CURB Am FENCE To REMAIN r�a9 � RAa T �9Avm .� u.DRIVE T19aD ITN xao'QUEUING IE.. ,RIO626 1S RER-AR EXISTING CATCH BASIN MTN CONTE.CIT E 105 16. ED.RACK FOR TWO SPACES(2.51 6'EACH) j • ' •/ _ 17. SIGHT OOfT WITH CUTOFF LEASE 1B MENU BOMB 4. ISTN[% . I 19. SPEAKER / �I. IR. , zD BOLLARD �J..'.> 0 1. PRE-MEND BOARD r{ u xuwT OFARRAR¢BA R ^/ 4. e■�04 23.DIRECTIUA SwAOC • oMet 'Ci ._ a!!!llN I I zs.CURB FLUSH WEN ASPHALTETAL/ _ C` a�!�, i L1 DY\ t� jbR © � n BUMPER OVERHANG AT BMA / LME MI SHADY Let,E % 1 ®Ito 41� I OR late merit 0 h� r` .2., s` , / %�,,�j j A.I• r ^�rRmaS-- - _may V(.`�/ E iMV•t AM' A IoPRIEr 1/1sl • M SW SHADY LANE 0 ° " /- o A 21 REASONS • L • r— / 4 ® SITE PLAN SHEET TIRE: ERE PLAN 6 t9 m(IN TSM ICH I.1..-Mfl m CURB RADIUS SITE DATA _ PARKING G DATA ]� • AU.CURB RADII AFE 3.0'MESS OTHERWISE MBICATEO PRWO� BLDREQG AREED A PARKINS —J COSTING SITE AREA -19,345 S 0H AC PARKINGtZ DOL BLDG ppAAAjj6yyDppNG REQUIRED u DRAWN BY:I. STANDARD is - A 2.056 (0/1.000)'14.4 Y•-� CHECKED BY. TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA - 6,056 sr (31.3%) I.TOTAL WADING AREA - 2.056 4 (10.6%) COMPACT I REWIRED BICYCLE PAWING � SHEET, TOTAL DIVE IS£/PARHING AREA -11,233 S" (5fl15) 40144. 1 A AREA ir/V2PARKMG RECURRED "0'25 W TOTAL 16 A 2,056 (1/1.000) MOOS,IMPERVIOUS AREA -11269 ST (6601) C2.1 COSTING DPERNOIIS SURFACES -16,013 3 (62.01) EXISTING BULLDMG - 2.015 SF EXISTING vARKDw/INI9E ISu E - 09OB N0. 6 se 2190043.1$ SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW. 6-3-14 I EXHIBIT C City of Tigard T,GA}Z[, Memorandum To: Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner From: Greg Berry, Project Engineer Mike McCarthy, Sr. Project Engineer Re: SDR 2014-03; Shady Ln Retail Date: October 27, 2014 (Revised) Access Management (Section 18.705) Section 18.705.030.B requires site plans be presented for approval showing how access requirements are to be fulfilled in accordance with this chapter. The application includes a site and utility plan for a proposed conversion of a gas station to a drive- through coffee shop. Section 18.705.030.D states that all vehicular access and egress ... shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. A driveway directly connected to SW Shady Ln.will be widened to a 30-foot width to provide access to the site. This standard is met. Section 18.705.F Required walkways PLANNING Section 18.705.030.H.1 states that an access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the City and/or AASHTO (depending on jurisdiction of facility). An existing driveway widened to a 30-foot width will provide access to the site. The application includes a preliminary sight distance analysis concluding that adequate sight distance is available at the site access. It appears that this standard can be met, but sight distance will need to be verified at final design and after construction to verify that no changes have been made or objects added that would obscure Prior to any work on site, the applicant's engineer shall submit a preliminary access report to City engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and streets to be used by site traffic are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by the City and AASHTO. Upon completion of the improvements, the applicant's engineer shall submit a final access report to City engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and streets to be used by site traffic are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by the City and AASHTO. The applicant shall obtain approval of this report prior to final inspection. Section 18.705.030.H.2 states that driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be150 feet, measured from the right-of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from City Engineer review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. Greenburg Road is classified as an Arterial in the Tigard Transportation System Plan. The driveway is more than 150 feet from Greenburg Road so this standard is met. Section 18.705.030.H.3 and 4 states that the minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. SW Shady Lane is classified as a Neighborhood Route in the Tigard Transportation System Plan. The standard is met. Section 18.705.030.J includes minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use. For commercial or industrial developments for which less than 100 parking spaces are required,the minimum access width is a 24-foot wide paved section with curbs within a 30-foot easement width. The proposed widening of the driveway would meet or exceed this standard for access. Street And Utility Improvements Standards (Section 18.810): Chapter 18.810 provides construction standards for the implementation of public and private facilities and utilities such as streets, sewers, and drainage. The applicable standards are addressed below: Streets: Improvements: Section 18.810.030.A.1 states that streets within a development and streets adjacent shall be improved in accordance with the TDC standards. Section 18.810.030.A.2 states that any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with the TDC. Minimum Rights-of-Way and Street Widths: Section 18.810.030E requires a Neighborhood Route without bike to have at least a 54-foot right-of-way width and 32-foot paved section (if parking on both sides)with sidewalks 5-feet wide (if separated from the street by planter strips) or 6-feet wide (if curb-tight), street lights,storm drainage, and underground utilities. No streets within the development are proposed. SW Shady Lane is a Neighborhood Route improved with an existing 8-foot sidewalk within a 60-foot right-of-way. This standard is met. Street Alignment and Connections: Section 18.630.040 and 18.810.030.H.1 state that full street connections with spacing of no more than 530 feet between connections is required. Exceptions can be made where prevented by barriers such as topography, railroads, freeways, pre-existing developments, lease provisions, easements, covenants or other restrictions existing prior to May 1, 1995 which preclude street connections. A full street connection may also be exempted due to a regulated water feature if regulations would not permit construction. Additional street connections in this area are precluded by Highway 217 to the north, Greenburg Road to the west, and existing development on adjacent property to the east. Grades and Curves: Section 18.810.030.N states that grades shall not exceed ten percent on arterials, 12% on collector streets, or 12% on any other street (except that local or residential access streets may have segments with grades up to 15% for distances of no greater than 250 feet). Centerline radii of curves shall be as determined by the City Engineer. The existing grades along the Shady Lane frontage are less than 10%. No grade changes are proposed to these streets. This standard is met. Traffic Study: Section 18.810.030.CC Requires a traffic study for development proposals meeting certain criteria. The application includes a June 4, 2014, traffic study with July 1, 2014 supplement prepared by Brent Ahrend, P.E. of Group Mackenzie evaluating the intersection of SW Greenburg Road and Shady Lane and the site access at Shady Lane. The study found that the westbound left turn movement from Shady Lane to Greenburg Road currently experiences delays and a Level-of-Service (LOS) F. These delays are calculated to increase significantly with the addition of site trips, especially in the busier AM peak hour,when the left turn volume is calculated to approach capacity. Observations of the existing left turn movements noted that,in current traffic conditions, traffic queues from nearby signalized intersections regularly extend across the intersection of Greenburg Road with Shady Lane. These issues—the long delays faced by left-turners, the scarcity of gaps for making left turns, and that they would often be crossing through queues of waiting traffic—raise concerns about public safety at this location if the proposed development is constructed and these concerns are not mitigated. As each of these issues involves traffic turning left from Shady Lane onto Greenburg Road or turning left from the frontage road (opposite Shady Lane) onto Greenburg Road, these issues can be mitigated by prohibiting these left turns. The initial traffic study was prepared with the assumption that another development northwest of Greenburg Road will be constructing a `pork-chop' center island in the frontage road opposite Shady Lane that will physically prohibit straight-across and left-turning movements from the frontage road. This change is anticipated to improve traffic flow at this intersection. Based on review of the observations and calculations provided in this supplemental analysis, the need for these turn restrictions would exist if the Shady Ln retail development is constructed but the the iFly development is not constructed. Prior to any work on site,the applicant shall obtain city approval of plans to construct measures (such as a center island in Shady Lane or raised median in Greenburg Road) that physically prohibit left turns from Shady Lane onto Greenburg Road. Signage shall also be provided to reinforce this prohibition. Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit, the applicant shall obtain city approval of constructed measures (such as a center island in Shady Lane or raised median in Greenburg Road) that physically prohibit left turns from Shady Lane onto Greenburg Road. Signage shall also be provided to reinforce this prohibition. Prior to any work on site,the applicant shall obtain city and county approval of plans to construct measures (such as a center island in the frontage road or raised median in Greenburg Road) that physically prohibit left turns from the frontage road onto Greenburg Road. Signage shall also be provided to reinforce this prohibition. These items may be provided by another developer,but plans must be approved prior to construction work on this site. Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit,city and county approval shall be obtained of measures constructed (such as a center island in the frontage road or raised median in Greenburg Road) that physically prohibit left turns from the frontage road onto Greenburg Road. Signage shall also be provided to reinforce this prohibition. These items may be provided by another developer,but must be in place prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. This standard can be met by condition. Block Designs - Section 18.810.040.A states that the length,width and shape of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites for the use contemplated, consideration of needs for convenient access, circulation,control and safety of street traffic and recognition of limitations and opportunities of topography. Block Sizes: Section 18.810.040.B.1 states that the perimeter of blocks formed by streets shall not exceed 2,000 feet measured along the right-of-way line except: • Where street location is precluded by natural topography,wetlands or other bodies of water or,pre-existing development or; • For blocks adjacent to arterial streets, limited access highways, major collectors or railroads. • For non-residential blocks in which internal public circulation provides equivalent access. Additional street connections in this area are precluded by Highway 217 to the north, Greenburg Road to the west, and existing development on adjacent property to the east. Easements: Section 18.810.050 states that easements for sewers, drainage,water mains, electric lines, or other public utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions, and where a development is traversed by a watercourse or drainageway, there shall be provided a stormwater easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of the watercourse. Section 18.810.050.B states that a property owner proposing a development shall make arrangements with the city, the applicable district, and each utility franchise for the provision and dedication of utility easements necessary to provide full services to the development. The city's standard width for mainline easements shall be 15 feet unless otherwise specified by the utility company, applicable district, or city engineer. The site is fully served by existing utilities. No easements are required. Sidewalks: Section 18.810.070.A requires that sidewalks be constructed to meet City design standards along at least one side of industrial streets. An 8-foot wide sidewalk is along the SW Greenburg Road and Shady Lane frontages. This standard is met. Section 18.810.070.B states that if there is an existing sidewalk on the same side of the street as the development within 300 feet in either direction, the sidewalk shall be extended from the site to meet the existing sidewalk, subject to rough proportionality. An existing sidewalk is along the SW Greenburg Road and Shady Lane frontages of the entire block. No additional sidewalks are required. Sanitary Sewers: Sewers Required: Section 18.810.090.A requires that sanitary sewer be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the comprehensive plan. Sewer Plan approval: Section 18.810.090.B requires that the applicant obtain City Engineer approval of all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prior to issuance of development permits involving sewer service. Over-sizing: Section 18.810.090.0 states that proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. An existing sewer will continue to serve the site. No other sewer or sewer extension is required. Storm Drainage: General Provisions: Section 18.810.100.A requires developers to make adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff. The site will continue to drain to catch basins at the southeast and southwest corner of the parking lot and directly discharge to the storm drain in SW Shady Lane. Accommodation of Upstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.0 states that a culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area,whether inside or outside the development. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2000 and including any future revisions or amendments). There is no upstream drainage. Effect on Downstream Drainage: Section 18.810.100.D states that where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by Clean Water Services in 2007 and including any future revisions or amendments). The impervious area of the site will be reduced from 83% to 69% so provision for additional runoff is not required. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by Clean Water Services (CWS) Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 07-20) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed in accordance with the CWS Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary Sewer and Surface Water Management and shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan shall be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. The two existing catch basins are proposed to be replaced with Contech Storm Filter Catch Basins to meet the water quality standards for a redeveloped site. In 1997, Clean Water Services (CWS) completed a basin study of Fanno Creek and adopted the Fanno Creek Watershed Management Plan. Section V of that plan includes a recommendation that local governments institute a stormwater detention/effective impervious area reduction program resulting in no net increase in storm peak flows up to the 25-year event. The City will require that all new developments resulting in an increase of impervious surfaces of more than 1,000 square feet provide onsite detention facilities, unless the development is located adjacent to Fanno Creek. For those developments adjacent to Fanno Creek, the storm water runoff will be permitted to discharge without detention, but a fee-in-lieu would be required. The impervious area of the site will be reduced from 83% to 69% so detention is not required. Utilities: Section 18.810.120 states that all utility lines,but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground, except for surface mounted transformers, surface mounted connection boxes and meter cabinets which may be placed above ground, temporary utility service facilities during construction, high capacity electric lines operating at 50,000 volts or above, and: • The developer shall make all necessary arrangements with the serving utility to provide the underground services; • The City reserves the right to approve location of all surface mounted facilities; • All underground utilities, including sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in streets by the developer, shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of the streets; and • Stubs for service connections shall be long enough to avoid disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. Exception to Under-Grounding Requirement: Section 18.810.120.0 states that a developer shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding costs when the development is proposed to take place on a street where existing utilities which are not underground will serve the development and the approval authority determines that the cost and technical difficulty of under-grounding the utilities outweighs the benefit of under-grounding in conjunction with the development. The determination shall be on a case-by-case basis. The most common, but not the only, such situation is a short frontage development for which under-grounding would result in the placement of additional poles, rather than the removal of above-ground utilities facilities. An applicant for a development which is served by utilities which are not underground and which are located across a public right-of-way from the applicant's property shall pay a fee in-lieu of under-grounding. There are existing overhead utility lines along the opposite side of SW Shady Lane. Payment of a fee in-lieu of undergrounding the utilities is required and estimated at $5,600. Fire and Life Safety: The applicant shall provide approval from Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) for access and hydrant location prior to any work on site. Public Water System: Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) provides service in this area. The application includes a service provider letter from"TWD stating that adequate capacity is available to provide service to the proposed development. Prior to any work on site the applicant shall provide documented approval from the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) of the design of water service to the site. TVWD approval of construction shall be obtained prior to final inspection. Grading and Erosion Control: CWS Design and Construction Standards also regulate erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per CWS regulations, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. The applicant shall meet the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act regarding National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) erosion control permits that may be needed for this project. The applicant shall follow all applicable requirements regarding erosion control, particularly those of the Federal Clean Water Act, State of Oregon, Clean Water Services, and City of Tigard including obtaining and abiding by the conditions of NPDES 1200-C or 1200-C-N permits as applicable. From the size of the anticipated disturbed area, it appears that only a city erosion control permit will be necessary. Site Permit Required: The applicant is required to obtain a Site Permit from the Building Division to cover all on-site private utility installations (water, sewer, storm, etc.) and driveway construction. This permit shall be obtained prior to any work on site and prior to issuance of the building permit. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ANY WORK ON SITE: Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tigard-or.gov) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of building permits, a Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover street improvements, public utility issues, and any other work in the public right-of-way. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee". Prior to any work on site, the applicant's engineer shall submit a preliminary access report to City engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and streets to be used by site traffic are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by the City and AASHTO. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain city approval of plans to construct measures (such as a center island in Shady Lane or raised median in Greenburg Road) that physically prohibit left turns from Shady Lane onto Greenburg Road. Signage shall also be provided to reinforce this prohibition. Prior to any work on site, the applicant shall obtain city and county approval of plans to construct measures (such as a center island in the frontage road or raised median in Greenburg Road) that physically prohibit left turns from the frontage road onto Greenburg Road. Signage shall also be provided to reinforce this prohibition. These items may be provided by another developer,but plans must be approved prior to construction work on this site. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition (and any subsequent versions or updates)." Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain all permits and service provider letters necessary from all appropriate agencies (such as Washington County, Tualatin Valley Water Department and Clean Water Services) for all work to be done on site. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain approval from Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue. Prior to any ground disturbance on the site the applicant shall obtain an erosion control permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain city and CWS approval of plans for the construction of the stormwater treatment facilities. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT: Submit to the Engineering Department (Greg Berry, 503-718-2468 or greg@tigard-or.gov) for review and approval: Prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit, the applicant shall obtain city and CWS approval of the complete construction of the stormwater treatment facilities and maintenance plans. Prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit, the applicant shall obtain city approval of the complete construction of the proposed driveway. The applicant's engineer shall submit a final access report to City engineering staff which verifies design of driveways and streets to be used by site traffic are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight distance and deceleration standards as set by the City and AASHTO. Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit,the applicant shall obtain city approval of constructed measures (such as a center island in Shady Lane or raised median in Greenburg Road) that physically prohibit left turns from Shady Lane onto Greenburg Road. Signage shall also be provided to reinforce this prohibition. Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit,city and county approval shall be obtained of measures constructed (such as a center island in the frontage road or raised median in Greenburg Road) that physically prohibit left turns from the frontage road onto Greenburg Road. Signage shall also be provided to reinforce this prohibition. These items may be provided by another developer,but must be in place prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. Prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit, the applicant shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding overhead utilities. l:AI?N(;\Development I \Shady 1,n\S1)R 14-INI003 Comments Shade l.n retail.docx REQUEST FOR COMMENTS s " CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TIGARD DATE: August 21,2014 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Gary Pagenstecher,Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2434 Fax: (503) 718-2788 E-Mail:_Garyp@tigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2014-00003 - RETAIL AT SHADY LANE - REQUEST: The applicant requests redevelopment of a 0.44 acre parcel located at 9785 SW Shady Lane from a former gas station/playground equipment store into a drive-through coffee shop with associated site improvements. LOCATION: 9785 SW Shady Lane; Washington County Tax Map 1S135BD,Tax Lot 00200. ZONE: MUC: mixed use commercial district. The MUC zoning district includes land around the Washington Square Mall and land immediately west of Highway 217. Primary uses permitted include office buildings, retail, and service uses. Also permitted are mixed- use developments and housing at densities of 50 units per acre. Larger buildings are encouraged in this area with parking under, behind or to the sides of buildings. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.630, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Zoning Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday September 4, 2014. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. — Please contact of our office. — Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting: ft)I( ?I ,5 �„ („ CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS "' j NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS: SDfZ.ZO / l ` bt) FILENAME: s-tAby L/i'w � �GIX ✓Place a checkmark in the block to the left of the name of each person or organization that needs to be notified. CITY OFFICES C.D.Administration/Kenny Asher,CD Director C.D.Administration/Tom McGuire,Asst CD Director City Administration/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder Development Services/Planning-Engineering Techs. Development Services/Development Eng.fifty(Copy on all Notices of Decision) (, %ft r.e y Development Services/Arborist v a / I Building Division/Mark VanDomelen,Building Official I Police Department/Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer Public Works/Brian Rager,Asst PW Director Public Works/Karleen Aichele,Engineer Tech 1 Hearings Officer(2 sets) Planning Commission(12 sets) City Attorney u )I File/Reference(2 sets) LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS City of Beaverton,Planning Manager,POB 4755,Beaverton OR 97076* City of Beaverton,Steven Sparks,Dev Svcs Mgr,POB 4755,Beaverton OR 97076* City of Durham City Manager,17160 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd,Durham OR 97224* City of King City City Manager,15300 SW 116th Ave,King City OR 97224* City of Lake Oswego,Planning Director,POB 369,Lake Oswego OR 97034* City of Portland,Planning Bureau Director,1900 SW 4th Ave,Suite 4100,Portland OR 97201 City of Tualatin Planning Manager,18880 SW Martinazzi Ave,Tualatin OR 97062* Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,Joanna Mensher,Data Resource Center(ZCA-Adopted)* Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,Paulette Copperstone,(ZCA-RFC Only)* Metro-Land Use and Planning,600 NE Grand Ave,Portland OR 97232-2736,0.Gerald Uba,PhD,(CPA/DCA/ZON)* ODOT,Rail Division,Dave Lanning,Sr.Crossing Safety Specialist,555 13th Street NE,Suite 3,Salem OR 97301-4179(Notify if ODOT R/R-Hwy Crossing is only access to land) ODOT,Region 1-Development Review Coordinator Carl Tor)and,Right-of-Way Section,123 NE Flanders,Portland OR 97209-4037(Vacations)* A I ODOT Region 1 Development Review Program,123 NW Flanders St,Portland OR 97209 OR Dept of Energy,Bonneville Power Administration,Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera,POB 3621,Portland OR 97208-3621(powerlines in area) OR Dept of Aviation,Tom Highland,Planning,3040 25th Street,SE,Salem OR 97310(monopole towers) OR Dept of Environmental Quality(DEQ),Regional Administrator,2020 SW Fourth Ave,Suite 400,Portland OR 97201-4987 (Notify for Wetlands and Potential Environmental Impacts) OR Dept of Fish&Wildlife,Elizabeth Ruther,Habitat Biologist,North Willamette Watershed District,18330 NW Sauvie Island Road,Portland OR 97231 OR Dept of Geo.&Mineral Ind.,800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5,Portland OR 97232 OR Dept of Land Conservation&Dev.,Mara Ulloa,635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150,Salem OR 97301-2540(Comp Plan Amendments&Measure 37)-Per 11/18/13 email from John Floyd-u have the option to send email copies See DLCD website for online submittal procedures OR Division of State Lands,Melinda Wood(WLUN Form Required),775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100,Salem OR 97301-1279 Per 08/07/13 email from Cheryl Caines-docs should be emailed/do not send hard copies OR Parks and Rec Dept State Historic Preservation Office,725 Sumner St NE,Suite C,Salem OR 97301(Notify if property has HD overlay) OR Public Utilities Commission,550 Capitol Street NE,Salem OR 97310-1380 US Army Corps of Engineers,Kathryn Harris,Routing CENWP-OP-G,POB 2946,Portland OR 97208-2946(Maps and CWS letter only) Washington County Consolidated Communications Agency(WCCCA)"911",Dave Austin,POB 6375,Beaverton OR 97007-0375(monopole towers) I Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Naomi Vogel-Beattie,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 13,Hillsboro OR 97124(general apps)* Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Brent Curtis,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 13,Hillsboro OR 97124(CPA)* Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Assessment&Taxation,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 9,Hillsboro OR 97124(ZCA)* Washington County,Dept of Land Use&Trans,Doria Mateja,Cartography,155 N First Ave,Suite 350,MS 14,Hillsboro OR 97124(ZCA)* UTILITY PROVIDERS,SPECIAL DISTRICTS&AGENCIES Beaver-ton School District#48,Jennifer Garland,Demographics,16550 SW Merlo Rd,Beaverton OR 97006-5152 Century Link,Lynn Smith,Right-of-Way Manager,OR and SW WA,8021 SW Capitol Hill Rd,Portland OR 97219 Century Link,Attn: John Pfeifer,1600 7th Ave,4th Floor,Seattle,WA 98191-0000(proposed and approved Annexation notices) Century Link,Karen Stewart,Local Government Affairs Director,310 SW Park Ave,Portland OR 97205(proposed and approved Annexation notices) I Clean Water Services,Development Services Department,David Schweitzer/SWM Program,2550 SW Hillsboro Hwy,Hillsboro OR 97123* I/CURPLN/MASTERS/REO FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST(UPDATED OB 13 13) Page 1 of 2 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS Comcast Cable Corp.,Gerald Backhaus,14200 SW Brigadoon Court,Beaverton OR 97005(See map for area contact) UTILITY PROVIDERS,SPECIAL DISTRICTS&AGENCIES(continued) Comcast Cable Corp.,Alex Silantiev,9605 SW Nimbus Ave,Bldg 12,Beaverton OR 97008(See map for area contact) Metro Area Communications Commission(MACC),Fred Christ,15201 NW Greenbrier Parkway,C-1,Beaverton OR 97006-4886(annexations only) j NW Natural Gas Company,Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord.,220 SW Second Ave,Portland OR 97209-3991 NW Natural Gas Company,Account Services,ATTN: Annexation Coordinator 220 SW Second Ave,Portland OR 97209-3991(Annexations only) " 1 Portland General Electric,Mike Hieb,Svc Design Consultant,9480 SW Boeckman Rd,Wilsonville OR 97070 Portland Western R/R,Burlington Northern/Sante Fe R/R,Oregon Electric R/R,(Burlington,Northern/Sante Fe R/R predecessor),Bruce Carswell,President and GM,200 Hawthorne Ave SE,Suite C320,Salem OR 97301-5294 Union Pacific Railroad,Director of Public Affairs,301 NE 2nd Ave,Portland OR 97232(currently the PA Dir is Brock Nelson,503-249-3079) Tigard/Tualatin School District#23J,Teri Brady,Administrative Offices,6960 SW Sandburg St,Tigard OR 97223-8039 Tigard Water District,POB 230281,Portland OR 97281-0281 1(� Tualatin Hills Parks and Rec District,Planning Mgr,15707 SW Walker Rd,Beaverton OR 97006* j Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue,John Wolff,DeputyFire Marshall,11945 SW 70th Ave,Tigard OR 97223-9196* Tualatin Valley Water District,Administrative Office,1850 SW 170th Ave,Beaverton OR 97006* Tri-Met Transit Development,Ben Baldwin,Project Planner,710 NE Holladay St,Portland Or 97232(If project is within 1/4 mile of a transit route) `` Verizon,John Cousineau,OSP Network,4155 SW Cedar Hills Blvd,Beaverton OR 97005 *Indicates automatic notification in compliance with intergovernmental agreement if within 500'of the subject property for any/all city projects(Porject Planner is Responsible for Indicating Parties to Notify) This document is password protected. Please see Chris or Doreen if you need updates.Thank you. If this roster is updated,please update the corresponding mailing labels at I/CURPLN/Request for Comments Notification Labels I/CURPLN/MASTERS/REO FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION LIST(UPDATED 08 1313) Page 2 of 2 i IN _ CITY OF TIGARD TIGARD CARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DA l I : august 21, 2014 TO: PER ATTACHED FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CON'l'ACI': Gary Pagenstecher, Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2434 Fax: (503) 718-2788 E-Mail:_Garyp@tigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2014-00003 - RETAIL AT SHADY LANE - REQUEST: The applicant requests redevelopment of a 0.44 acre parcel located at 9785 S ' Shady bane from a former gas station/playground equipment store into a drive-through coffee shop with associated site improvements. LOCATION: 9785 SW Shady .I.ane; Washington County Tax Map 1 S135BD, Tax I.ot 00200. ZONE: MUC: mixed use commercial district. The MUC zoning district includes land around the Washington Square Mall and land immediately vvest of I lighway 217. Primary uses permitted include office buildings, retail, and service uses. Also permitted are mixed- use developments and housing at densities of 50 units per acre. Larger buildings are encouraged in this area with parking under, behind or to the sides of buildings. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.630, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Zoning Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will:be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday September 4, 2014. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 S\4'I fall Boulevard,"Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it, Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE John Wolff IAAI-CFI • ' ' Deputy Fire Marshal H CONDITIONALLY APPROVED, fl t � � � (503)259-1504-direct APPROVAL OF PLANS i3 NOT'AN App t omission OR sworn. RU1tAt OF ,Z,.' ,"`,, (503) 642-4514-fax Nar Tualatin Valley (503)649-8577-main SEIIA )J$,�'' R..,,...,.-,,,,.,,,,,Q Fire & Rescue Jolin.Wolff@tvfr.comC,_ ExAm ,4--- 11945 ar11945 S.W.70th Avenue DATE Tigard,OR 97223-9196 www.tvfr.com Gary Pagenstecher From: Rick Kappler <rickk@sunsetforest.com> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 1:03 PM To: Gary Pagenstecher Subject: Site review comment Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged Site Development Review SDR2014-0003/Drive-Through Coffee Shop Requestfor redevelopment of a 0.44-acre parcel located at 9785 SW Shady Lane from a former gas station/playground equipment store into a drive-through coffee shop. Nearby Fanno Creek needs a clean-up. This place would make a great greenspace or park.There are far too many crashes on Greenburg. Rick Kappler Sunset Forest Products Portland, OR 1 • CleanWater Services MEMORANDUM Date: September 2, 2014 To: Gary Pagenstecher, Associat Planner, City of Tigard From: Jackie Sue Humphrey lean Water Services (the District) Subject: Retail at Shady Lane, SDR 2014-00003, 1S135BD00200 Please include the following comments when writing your conditions of approval: PRIOR TO ANY WORK ON THE SITE A Clean Water Services(the District) Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization must be obtained. Application for the District's Permit Authorization must be in accordance with the requirements of the Design and Construction Standards, Resolution and Order No. 07-20, (or current R&O in effect at time of Engineering plan submittal), and is to include: a. Detailed plans prepared in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 2.04.2.b-1. b. Detailed grading and erosion control plan. An Erosion Control Permit will be required. Area of Disturbance must be clearly identified on submitted construction plans. c. Detailed plans showing the development having direct access by gravity to public storm and sanitary sewer. d. Provisions for water quality in accordance with the requirements of the above named design standards. Water Quality is required for all new development and redevelopment areas per R&O 07-20, Section 4.05.5, Table 4-1. Access shall be provided for maintenance of facility per R&O 07-20, Section 4.02.4. e. If use of an existing offsite or regional Water Quality Facility is proposed, it must be clearly identified on plans, showing its location, condition, capacity to treat this site and, any additional improvements and/or upgrades that may be needed to utilize that facility. f. If private lot LIDA systems proposed,must comply with the current CWS Design and Construction Standards. A private maintenance agreement, for the proposed private lot LIDA systems,needs to be provided to the City for review and acceptance. 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 V Phone: (503)681-3600 • Fax: (503)681-3603 • cleanwaterservices.org g. Show all existing and proposed easements on plans. Any required storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water quality related easements must be granted to the City. h. Application may require additional permitting and plan review from the District's Source Control Program. For any questions or additional information, please contact Source Control at(503) 681-5175. i. Any proposed offsite construction activities will require an update or amendment to the current Service Provider Letter for this project. CONCLUSION This Land Use Review does not constitute the District's approval of storm or sanitary sewer compliance to the NPDES permit held by the District. The District,prior to issuance of any connection permits, must approve final construction plans and drainage calculations. " CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TIGARD DATE: August 21, 2014 �,, / TO: PER ATTACHED 'VIM. VY DLA' - I'D FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Gary Pagenstecher,Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2434 Fax: (503) 718-2788 E-Mail:_Garyp@tigard-or.gov SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2014-00003 - RETAIL AT SHADY LANE - REQUEST: The applicant requests redevelopment of a 0.44 acre parcel located at 9785 SW Shady Lane from a former gas station/playground equipment store into a drive-through coffee shop with associated site improvements. LOCATION: 9785 SW Shady Lane; Washington County Tax Map 1S135BD, Tax Lot 00200. ZONE: MUC: mixed use commercial district. The MUC zoning district includes land around the Washington Square Mall and land immediately west of Highway 217. Primary uses permitted include office buildings, retail, and service uses. Also permitted are mixed- use developments and housing at densities of 50 units per acre. Larger buildings are encouraged in this area with parking under, behind or to the sides of buildings. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.630, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. Attached are the Site Plan, Zoning Map and Applicant's Materials for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday September 4, 2014. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _� We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. — Please refer to the enclosed letter or email. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person Commenting: r ` 1M ©`C 50-5. ,18 . 15/0 1 0„,,r1 P* R* 1 *D* E DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OR 97140 Phone: (503) 625-6177 Fax: (503) 625-6179 May 12, 2014 Rick Tiland Tiland/Schmidt Architects 3611 SW Hood Ave#200 Portland, OR 97239 Re: Starbucks on Shady Ln We have reviewed the site plan for the above project. The placement of the enclosure will allow for the straight on access required as long as all of the parking places in front of the enclosure are unoccupied at the time of collection. I would recommend there be signs put in place for no parking during designated hours. Those designated hours would be determined later at the time service is established and customer is put on route(s). If there are any cars parked in those 7 spots in front of the enclosure when we arrive for collection we will be unable to service the containers. The enclosure is shown to have inside measurements of 10' wide and 20' deep. This will allow for us to stack 2 front load containers 1 in front of the other. The back container, for recycling, will need to be on wheels. Please note these additional requirements for the enclosure also need to be met: • The gates need to be hinged in front of the enclosure walls to allow for the full width. This will also allow for the 120 degree opening angle that is required. • The gates need cane bolts and holes put in place for the gates to be locked in the open and closed position. The holes for the gates to be held open need to be at the full 120 degree opening angle. Please note the gate on the right(east) side of the enclosure may need to be shortened to allow it to go over the curbing/landscape and allow for the required opening angle. • There should be no center post at the access point to the enclosure. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Kristin Leichner Pride Disposal Co. (503) 625-6177 kristinlpridedisposal.com l� ..." / „„..„.",........: _2.,.:*". „ ,„,„......_ ...,....,;.,,,......„...2„ .....:. .._, ,.,,,., ,............ LeE ��OLOC .�.� il TIL AND H11D� T •NCNIT.Cla K . +L.m . /'i ' �� XIII NNMNIIIIIIh— �i, '� �■1111u11MU — � , _ ♦ 44�■11111u1N Ni:' --k 4.;.• \11111111,4 r -� ® . QIN Q 1 u I VP � W 10'.0• '� : Z :: Q 0 11 I Idl : ..,.....;_,14.,_,... s t.�l 1! 04'-0•W CA/10.0E FN. �r F- $ P 0.R)KASCNRT SCAEEEN 11.1 0 / ...,, . ......�.•, - a:..+_,...=_. �.-.. wnu QI / Q / / 1L Slit 6,4,407 LME E •I O.'AGiE 6T..C.ATE6 1°RO ECT NO. _ -) — wa.19191 � _..... fico®n. TRASH E D ENCLOSURE I SITE PLAN 07.k ~.. I.la.. Ci g .2 SP 8 MAILING / NOTIFICATION RECORDS AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TIGARD I, Gary Pagenstecher,being first duly sworn/affirm,on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Appropriate Box(s)Below NOTICE OF Type II Decision FOR: SDR2014-00003 Retail Shady Lane D AMENDED NOTICE— • City of Tigard Community Development Director's Designee ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part hereof, October 20,2014,and deposited in the United States Mail on October 20,2014 ,postage prepaid. Gary P enstecher STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 2°I day of OC ,2014. 141".1% OFFICIAL STAMP �11i BETSY GALICIA NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON NOTARY PUB I IC OF OREGON NO. 925741 MY COMMISSION EXP RETS MARCH 09,2018 My Commission Expires: 3/q /I llM\Sr.1dministrative Specialist\Affidavits\2U14\.Affidavit of Nlailing_Noticc of I'ypc 11 Decision_SIR211141NHHB_Gan'1020 14.docx r/rrtaif-vi 7 cc)/ EXHIBIT A 111111 Notice of a Type II Decision i Site Development Review T I G A It D Case ID: SDR2014-00003 14 RETAIL AT SHADY LANE The Decision Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the request for Site Development Review (SDR2014-00003) subject to certain conditions of approval for redevelopment of a 0.44 acre parcel located at 9785 SW Shady Lane for a drive-through coffee shop and associated site improvements. Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Monday, October 20, 2014 120 days = Wednesday, December 17,2014 Staff Contact: Gary Pagenstecher 503-718-2434 Garyp@tigard-or.gov Appeal Information All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision may appeal the decision. Appeal forms are available on the city's website or by person at the Permits Center. If you would like to appeal this land use decision,we need to receive your completed appeal form by 4 p.m. on Wednesday,November 05,2014. Please include the Case ID Number: SDR2014-00003. Please hand-deliver your completed appeal form (which will be time-stamped) and pay the associated appeal fees at the Permits Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. If you have any questions regarding this decision please address them to the appropriate staff person noted on this form: Gary Pagenstecher and note the Case ID Number: SDR2014-00003 This decision is final on Monday, October 20, 2014, unless an appeal is filed. The decision will go into effect on Thursday, November 06, 2014, unless an appeal is filed. A copy of the Final Decision is available upon request from the staff contact person noted above. Information About the Decision Applicant: MAJ Development Corp Owner: Stanley and Audene Nored c/o Mike Jenkins 511 NEE 21st Place 300 West 15th Street, Suite 200 Canby, OR 97013 Vancouver,WA 98660 Applicant's Rep: Mackenzie c/o Ryan Shera 1515 SE Water Avenue, Suite 100 Portland, OR 97214 Description of the Proposal: The applicant requests redevelopment of a 0.44 acre parcel located at 9785 SW Shady Lane, formerly used as a gas station and then a playground equipment store. The proposal would remodel the existing building with a small addition for a drive-through coffee shop and associated site improvements. City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 my. 1 • Address: 9785 SW Shady Lane; Legal Description: Washington County Tax Map 1S135BD,Tax Lot 00200 Zoning: MUC: Mixed Use Commercial District Appeal Procedure Details The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1 may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2 of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. The deadline for filing an appeal is 4 p.m. on Wednesday,November 05,2014 Vicinity Map Site Plan City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg.2 VICINITY MAP V K i SDR2014-00003 Retail at Shady Lane 96(10 9600 9600 Coffee Shop Drive-Through 9600 9600 9600 9600 ���,' ` 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 r',75,17 , [1 960 Subject Site :1a 10655 -7 10763 ;- . ; (�. WILT 44 10763 �l 10763 = y ��. . MIN 97 35 97 35 —_�' + I '. -- 10765 41. AME■M■■ 9735 1Y` 4" I■■��IIII■ 9735 L rF: - 10850 0 �■■■■■�■■CZ- AMMONE111111111 9735 9735 ■■■■■■. 9735 9735 . ■■■■.■■■■ ..0775 9800InformationInformation on this map is for general location 9804 97$� only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. 9780 9770 97:_30 p Approx.Scale 1:2,000-1 In=16/tt 9780 Map printed at 08:00 AM on 18-Oct-14 9780 DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.THE CITY OF TIGARD C MAKES NO WARRANTY,REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE 10830 10 855 THE DATA PROVIDED HEREMLTHE CIORTY OF h PARD SHALLSSUME No LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS.OMISSIONS.OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. 10875 _ City of Tigard p 131825 SW Hall Blvd 10895 TIGAR�gPs OR 9503 a ININii www.tigard-or.gov T 1 G n H D 9655 M . Architecture•Interiors Planning•Engineering / KEYNOTES O- -- / 12_. mSTALL CITY OF TIGARD COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY -.. Me 93,0,» INSTALL LNM)SCAPMD j INSTALL TRASH ENCLOSURE SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS 306w F%ISTMC Sld TO REMAIN AND BE IRJN.ANOEO H99Ms / ?".:1:S2.'.65': MATGH EXISTING SNEWALKetYw'mtlRTs�AVal/, _j ��'-_� Nor usmMACKENZIE.REPLACE L%IsnNG dlHErr6r MINcddETE sREWAHM .��///// ,. msrAu r WIm eREARrnwE../ INSTALL ADA CdPLIANT RAMP �I�-�T�.�• 000W'EWfETH BIIfff/ / m5TAU1 LDA OdPiMt CgtNER RAMPVMIC�I BtWAgeesem3TALL ADA Sid/ I ., VFW sloe.sae Gmutn WNf3iETE CRO55 NALICEctal tmL PNLiM/ �, RCasR6• . EXISTING L11RB ANO FENCE TD REM/UNO DRIVE 1NRU VAIN 20G QUEUING LENGTH�� orbFl�rxEFHW REPLACE EXISTMC Gid BARN MTH CdTEd W. j • /•s oDe. BMF RACK FOT TRO SPACES(251!'EAGH) „ ,„.,,...„,„..,,,,,,,,./7/44///, ♦ r;lr'a IX SIGHT LIGHT MM WTOFF WM \�\�'' �, Y 0.AxWM' �, / �i l6. MENU 60M0 ..� m EXISTING BLDG ■ la. sPEANER BO 20.BOLLARD 33.. W , 2,. PRE-MENU ROAM / / i" �; 22.HEIGHT CLEARANCE BAR • :���F'.. SI �*'�O�H�� 23.DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE 1 �-j/ «e��.2�IF� I�� 2R.CURB FLUSH TM ASPHALT FETAL / s M ev7aA 101' El j 25.BUMPER OVERHANG AT SHADY ) , , �_ ,LAME ©y r% „ - D MVO.71 LANE //:T _ r f0 m ® piii" _ 0 �f j mmest/Osess mew; / -.;45..{,e'7l I • - �� " /�IrcR.Tm.cNT•As r • • e g F nnI � / .. Q 0.., ..-.. !EXPIRES.I2/31/i5I . • / AMEM MM.ME MI MMIMY ®SW SHADY LANE V * ®N j --`---------------- ----------------------------------- REVISION. IT % j 0 L$"em=me _1-.._.___... ,__, 1 _ __.._.._.. 1 .• �/ ' e SITE PLAN SHEET TITLE: 7 M r R t+ M SITE F'UW SR(M TaT)'R CURB RADIUS SUE DATA PARKING DATA PROPOSED BLOWan R F"'"6 REWIIRE° DRAM Be IRF ALL WON RADII ARE J.0'UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED EXISTING SITE AREA -I9,315 S 0.44 AC ARMING g��771T la A OCL A LOSS P/1.000) CHECKED 1St STANDARD 15 TOTAL lANOSCAPE AREA - 6,056 SF (30.3%) COMPACT0 . TOTAL BUDDING AREA - 2.056 SF (10.6%) 1 REWIREDRR BICYCLE PANG AgggiSLOG ARCA PARKING RC,., X TOTALatm AREA -. OTA 11,233 SIF (56.1%) IL 16 A�ZU—ltAI5IVE ISI ' - C2.1 PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA -13,266 SF (61T%) EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACES -16,013 SF (627x) _�xArsCxC��� EXISTING BUILDING - 2.015 5F 'm 00. LIHSISI•PxR,1J EXISTING PARKMG/DRIVE ISLE -13,966 SF SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW: 61-14 ...... ,.. EXHIBIT B 1S135BD00900 1S135BD00100 DORR, PATRICK M SUN LIFE ASSURANCE CO OF CANADA 10250 SW KABLE ST BY NORRIS BEGGS &SIMPSON TIGARD OR 97224 121 SW MORRISON ST#200 PORTLAND OR 97204 1S135BD01000 1S135BC00900 TIGARD, CITY OF PAULSON LIMITED LIABILITY CO 13125 SW HALL BY RICHARD G PAULSON SR TIGARD OR 97223 10855 SW CASCADE BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 1S135BD01400 1S135BD00300 TIGARD, CITY OF MCFADDEN,ARTHUR L 13125 SW HALL BLVD BY SKLARZ, ERIC TIGARD OR 97223 621 SW MORRISON ST, STE 800 PORTLAND OR 97205 1S1356000800 1S135BA03300 PEARSON, DENNIS UNIVERSUS 15840 SE TONG RD BY STEVE ECOFF DAMASCUS OR 97089 1357 MADRONE LN SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93401 1S135BC00201 1S135BD01100 BELANICH ROGER M SHADY LANE COMMERCIAL BUILDING 22020 17TH AVE SE#200 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BOTHELL WA 98021 7720 SW WESTGATE PORTLAND OR 97225 15135BC00202 1S135BD01300 BELANICH, ROGER M SCHAEFER, ROBERT M& SALLY J& 22020 17TH AVE SE#200 MILLER, GERALD V BOTHELL WA 98021 BY SHILO INN-WASHINGTON SQUARE 11600 SW SHILO LN PORTLAND OR 97225 multiple: 1S135BB00700 to 1S135BB00800 1S135BC00300 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS INC UNITED STATES BAKERY 3441 E HARBOUR DR PO BOX 14769 PHEONIX AZ 85034 PORTLAND OR 97214 1S135BD00200 1S135BC00200 NORED, STANLEY D&AUDENE C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS NORTHWES 511 NE 21ST PL PO BOX 152206 CANBY OR 97013 IRVING TX 75015 1S135BC00100 1S135BD00700 RAJ PETROLEUM HARING, JACK ATTN: BATRA,RAY PO BOX 65387 10775 SW GREENBURG RD VANCOUVER WA 98665 TIGARD OR 97223 1S135BD01200 BURDICK-FORBES INVESTMENTS LLC BY DONALD C BURDICK 434 RIDGEWAY RD LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 DON& DOROTHY ERDT The following labels list interested persons who requested to be copied 13760 SW 121ST AVENUE on notices re:development taking place in Tigard. TIGARD OR 97223 BARRY ALBERTSON VANESSA FOSTER 15445 SW 150TH AVE 13085 SW HOWARD DR TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 SUSAN BEILKE MONA KNAPP 11755 SW 114TH PLACE 9600 SW FREWING STREET TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 ELLEN BEILSTEIN BEVERLY FROUDE 14630 SW 139TH AVE 12200 SW BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HEIDI BRENNEMAN NAOMI GALLUCCI 11680 SW TIGARD DRIVE 11285 SW 78TH AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 GRETCHEN BUEHNER 13249 SW 136TH PLACE TIGARD OR 97224 REX CAFFALL KEVIN HOGAN 13205 SW VILLAGE GLENN 14357 SW 133RD AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LORA GARLAND,CITY RECORDS HAROLD AND RUTH HOWLAND CITY OF TIGARD 13145 SW BENISH 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 PATRICIA KEERINS 12195 SW 121ST AVE TIGARD OR 97223 I:\CURPLN\Setup-Land Use FIIes\LABELS\CIT Labels Citywide.docx Last Update:0127 14 ALEXANDER CRAGHEAD JULIE RUSSELL, CPO 4B CHAIR 12205 SW HALL BOULEVARD 12662 SW TERRAVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223-6210 TIGARD OR 97224 GENE MILDREN BRAD SPRING MILDREN DESIGN GROUP 7555 SW SPRUCE STREET 7650 SW BEVELAND ST,STE 120 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 NATHAN AND ANN MURDOCK CHARLIE AND LARIE STALZER 7415 SW SPRUCE STREET 14781 SW JULIET TERRACE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 PATTY NEWTH ROSS SUNDBERG 12180 SW MERESTONE COURT 16382 SW 104TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 TODD HARDING&BLAKE HERING JR. WILLIAM S. FARGHER NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON EQUITY BUILDERS REALTY 121 SW MORRISON,SUITE 200 10300 SW 92N0 AVENUE PORTLAND OR 97204 HAPPY VALLEY OR 97086 DAVID WALSH GLENNA THOMPSON 10236 SW STUART COURT 13676 SW HALL BLVD UNIT 2 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 SUE RORMAN BRIAN WEGENER 11250 SW 82ND AVE 9830 SW KIMBERLY DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LISA HAMILTON CPO 4B VICE CHAIR CAROL RENAUD—WACO CPO NEWSLETTER COORD. 13565 SW BEEF BEND ROAD OSU EXTENSION SVC-CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACULTY TIGARD OR 97224 155 NORTH 1ST AVENUE SUITE 200 MS48 HILLSBORO OR 97124 JULIE RUSSELL CHAIR CPO 4B CHAIR JIM LONG, CHAIR,CPO 4M 16200 SW PACIFIC HWY SUITE H BOX 242 10730 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97223 :\CURPLN\Setup-Land Use Files\LABELS\CIT Labels CItywide.docc Last Update:01 27 14 NEAL BROWN.GRI DAVID KIMMEL MEADOWS INC REALTORS 1335 SW 66"SUITE 201 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA STREET PORTLAND OR 97225 TIGARD OR 97223 PLANNING COMMISSION (ALT)JOHN GOODHOUSE VICTOR DEFILIPPIS 9345 SW MOUNTAIN VIEW LANE 13892 SW BRAYDON CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 DAYLE D.& EVELYN 0. BEACH 11530 SW 72ND AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 I:\CURPLN\Setup-Land Use Files\LABELS\CIT Labels Citywide.docx Last Update:0127 14 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 1111 me TIGARD I, Gary Pagenstecher,being first duly sworn/affirm,on oath depose and say that I am an Associate Planner for the City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Check Appropriate Box(s)Below ® NOTICE OF Type II Proposal FOR: SDR2014-00003 9785 SW Shady Lane ❑ AMENDED NOTICE— ® City of Tigard Community Development Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part hereof,August 21,2014,and deposite• the United States Mail on August 21.2014,postage prepaid. cTh1Garagenstecher STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the �day of No "if ,2014. ^fvr��y OFFICIAL STAMP BETSY GALICIA NIELEOv NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON aoiLe_.;COMMISSION NO.925741 /MY COMMISSION I�(PIRES MARCH 09,20184 NOTARY P I LIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: 2/ ?/' (1 I:A(;ll:ADNl\Sr:Administrative Specialist\Affidavits\21114\—Stidavit of NIailing_Notice of'1'vpe I I Proposal S1)R2014-01NM13_Gary OS 21 14.docx EXHIBIT A le Notice of a Type II Proposal Site Development Review T l A R° Case ID: SDR2014-00003 Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Thursday,August 21, 2014 120 days = Wednesday, December 17, 2014 To: Interested Persons Staff Contact: Gary Pagenstecher 503-718-2434 Garyp@tigard-or.gov If you would like to comment on this proposal, we need to receive your written comments by 5 p.m. on Thursday, September 04, 2014. Please mail or deliver your comments to 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. Include the Case ID Numbers: SDR2014-00003. Please address your comments to the appropriate staff person: Gary Pagenstecher. Information About the Proposal Description of the Proposal: The applicant requests redevelopment of a 0.44 acre parcel located at 9785 SW Shady Lane from a former gas station/playground equipment store into a drive-through coffee shop with associated site improvements. Applicant: MAJ Development Corp c/o Mike Jenkins 300 West 15th Street, Suite 200 Vancouver,WA 98660 Applicant's Rep: Mackenzie c/o Ryan Shera 1515 SE Water Avenue, Suite 100 Portland, OR 97214 Owner: Stanley and Audene Nored 511 NEE 21st Place Canby, OR 97013 Proposal Address: 9785 SW Shady Lane Legal Washington County Tax Map 1S135BD,Tax Lot 00200. Description: Zoning: MUC: Mixed Use Commercial District Approval Criteria: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.630, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. What You Should Know About This Type II Proposal The proposed development requires a land use review. The goal of this notice is to invite interested parties City of Tigard,Community Development Division •13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 to participate early in the decision-making process by submitting comments in writing during the open comment period. Type II decisions are made by the Community Development Director after consideration of relevant evidence and public comments received during the open comment period. The decision will be mailed to the applicant and to owners of property located within 500 feet of the proposal site and anyone who submitted written comments or is otherwise entitled to a decision notice. The decision maker may: • Approve the proposal. • Approve the proposal with conditions. • Deny the proposal. All evidence considered in the decision will be contained in the public record and available for public review. If you would like to review this material, please schedule an appointment with Lora Garland, Records Management Specialist, 503-718-2483. If you wish to receive copies of the materials, city records will prepare them for you at a reasonable cost. Appeal Information Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Comments directed at the relevant approval criteria (Tigard Development Code) are what constitute relevant evidence. Details regarding the appeal process and requirements are contained within Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390. There is a fee charged for appeals. Attachments Included in this Notice Zoning and Site Map Notice to Mortgagee, Lienholder,Vendor, or Seller The Tigard Development Code requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser. City of Tigard,Community Development Division •13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 Zoning Map Generalized Zoning Categories c' Legend r, ' trap Subject Site OAK ST Zcrc Lescripticr -1 Residertial IA.AJVM ',nixed Use Resider'ial im Mixed Use CerJal Busiress Distric ALCommercial 217 -Mixed Use Employmert Irdl:strial - Parks arc Rocroa.icr Washirgtcr Cct r'y Zorirg Overlay Zones 41 01 Historic District Overlay 1171 Planned Development Overlay �� I 1 Aims 1 SHADY LN Map Pnnted 21-Aug-14 INFORMATION ON THIS OAP IS FOR GENERAL LOCATiO^ -' ONLY AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED'V IM THE DEVELOPM E"" \`� SERVICES DIVISION C e* •\ KES NOT WARRANTY�REPRESEN IONSOURCESTUE CITY OF'I ARD TO \ RTIPLE OR GUATUE CI!TEE AS TO TIi. A S CA D G- ONTENT ACCURACY TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF*" A , Ps 'J DATA PROVIDED HEREIN THE CITY OF TIGARD SHAT I ASSUME NC 7 ERRORS OMISSIONS r " < '40'IDED REGARD'.• R-12 ....-- COMMUNITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT in "A Place to Call I1O177C' O) �.,a City of Tigard 0 Feet WI 13125 SW Hall Blvd 240 P R r� R Tigard.OR 97223 71 R712 (PD),,, 503 71 wwtiBard-or-orgov TIGARD w MIN / Architecture•Interiors / , ' ' , ' / Planning•Engineering / KEYNOTES Q- / / TALL CITY R nGABU COYMAtlu OMSEWAr Y. 2. / /// IHSTAu IRASI wOLOSORE SE£AM]IIIECTgRN PIANS ' w'w•w / a. EIOSTMO 916 TO PELAM uq BE rSBRA1Cm 30114^ l % S YATGH EXISTING SJOE)IAIK WP.mdnnmR / 444// / --t-'_ a Nor USED MACKENZIE. // ). REPLACE EXISTING DNISENAv 16ER CONCRETE SIDEWALK t;r /(yj a 2'CURB WAX 0� / /• •. INSTALL AOA COYRJANT RAW ENI OEY9�PEBR CaP. / / 1/ la M51N1 ADA GpPINn CORN.RAMP 300 TpD FTM/MEET �J /, [[Arl INSTALL ADA SIGH VANQOI/1E9 WA 86660 • !'-� 12 CONCRETE CROSS WA. .(tr / O - •�'��•�.. 6 la EXISTING CUL®Arg FENCE TO REMAIN (� /�— 11. ORM THRI WTI M r OUEUMG LINGER 4/' �j oe c s nnnE Ionr 601 la REPLACE E><IsiMc urw 6A9N OM cwTEw ce LTu win>w to BIXE RACK rpt TWO SPACES(2.51 6'LADD • j _.FlRrmnRn 17. AGHT LIGHT MER COMET LINSE 16. MENU BOARD /• EXISTING BLDG la SPEAKER R / (,I M.BOLLARD „.1.).:,,: 7 W_� 'r.,. ° PRE-MND BOARD / } `r 22.HEIGHT CLEARANCE BAR / m 1(•,,,r- ! n "�aR,S. F7li2�' u DIRECTIONAL stwALx --_.- E + .I►�1 IMP.A•� US11 161ST ASMRALT a I / %\��I�NR P0 PETAL c, -. M.ROVER oWNIRANO AT SHADY / ®\\/ © �_ r VI WON 0 g)Iss BON 91ADr WE �- BM LLLLFF :I ~� '� / o !�°® ®�mm j� ® `1,..."..• r m ' !17 A i. Iv j • CD ° 0.2 .9L • n SW SHADY LANE O ° / /'/' _�_____—_________ • —_ _—__________ ________—___k__-______- g_REVISION •ORP II gees Anansime j SITE 4 C2t t E PLAN 9aET TIRE -:�� INTI PLAN As CURB RADIUS SFE DATA PARKNO DATA — 9EaME�R AMG DRAM rNILPARKING REWI ALL CURB RADII ME]0'UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED EASTMG SC AREA to]IS r all AC PARKING A 1.098 /1500)rCA OEC®orSTANDARD 15 TOTAL LANOXAPE AREA 6 6.056 r (3I.38) —---� TOTAL BURDINO AREA - 2066 r (tans) COPAL 0 REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING REWIRED MELT: NG AAY18D1[ I AL BLDG AREA 00) a2 TOTONICE 151ERRKING AAREA -11.223 r R (1/1.0 (5500 TOTAL A 2.056 C2.1 PROPOSED RNERVICIS AREA -13.266 SF (MVOL COSTING IWCMOUS SURFACES -13.01]V MVO EXISTING BUBDING - 2.015 r EXISTING PMKING/ORIS.E IS -13,96s r 'm'' SHE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW: 6-3-14 EXHIBIT B • 1S135BD00900 1S135BD00100 DORR, PATRICK M SUN LIFE ASSURANCE CO OF CANADA 10250 SW KABLE ST BY NORRIS BEGGS &SIMPSON TIGARD OR 97224 121 SW MORRISON ST#200 PORTLAND OR 97204 1S135BD01000 1S135BC00900 TIGARD, CITY OF PAULSON LIMITED LIABILITY CO 13125 SW HALL BY RICHARD G PAULSON SR TIGARD OR 97223 10855 SW CASCADE BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 1S135BD01400 1S135BD00300 TIGARD, CITY OF MCFADDEN, ARTHUR L 13125 SW HALL BLVD BY SKLARZ, ERIC TIGARD OR 97223 621 SW MORRISON ST, STE 800 PORTLAND OR 97205 1S135BD00800 1S135BA03300 PEARSON, DENNIS UNIVERSUS 15840 SE TONG RD BY STEVE ECOFF DAMASCUS OR 97089 1357 MADRONE LN SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93401 1S135BC00201 1S135BD01100 BELANICH ROGER M SHADY LANE COMMERCIAL BUILDING 22020 17TH AVE SE#200 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BOTHELL WA 98021 7720 SW WESTGATE PORTLAND OR 97225 1S135BC00202 1S135BD01300 BELANICH, ROGER M SCHAEFER, ROBERT M &SALLY J & 22020 17TH AVE SE#200 MILLER, GERALD V BOTHELL WA 98021 BY SHILO INN-WASHINGTON SQUARE 11600 SW SHILO LN PORTLAND OR 97225 multiple: 1S135BB00700 to 1S135BB00800 1S135BC00300 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS INC UNITED STATES BAKERY 3441 E HARBOUR DR PO BOX 14769 PHEONIX AZ 85034 PORTLAND OR 97214 1S135BD00200 1S135BC00200 NORED, STANLEY D&AUDENE C FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS NORTHWES 511 NE 21ST PL PO BOX 152206 CANBY OR 97013 IRVING TX 75015 1S135BC00100 1S135BD00700 RAJ PETROLEUM HARING,JACK ATTN: BATRA, RAY PO BOX 65387 10775 SW GREENBURG RD VANCOUVER WA 98665 TIGARD OR 97223 1S135BD01200 BURDICK-FORBES INVESTMENTS LLC BY DONALD C BURDICK 434 RIDGEWAY RD LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 DON & DOROTHY ERDT The following labels list interested persons who requested to be copied 13760 SW 1215T AVENUE on notices re:development taking place in Tigard. TIGARD OR 97223 BARRY ALBERTSON VANESSA FOSTER 15445 SW 150TH AVE 13085 SW HOWARD DR TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97223 SUSAN BEILKE MONA KNAPP 11755 SW 114TH PLACE 9600 SW FREWING STREET TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 ELLEN BEILSTEIN BEVERLY FROUDE 14630 SW 139TH AVE 12200 SW BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 HEIDI BRENNEMAN NAOMI GALLUCCI 11680 SW TIGARD DRIVE 11285 SW 78TH AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 GRETCHEN BUEHNER 13249 SW 136TH PLACE TIGARD OR 97224 REX CAFFALL KEVIN HOGAN 13205 SW VILLAGE GLENN 14357 SW 133RD AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LORA GARLAND,CITY RECORDS HAROLD AND RUTH HOWLAND CITY OF TIGARD 13145 SW BENISH 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 PATRICIA KEERINS 12195 SW 121sT AVE TIGARD OR 97223 \CURPLN\Setup-Land Use Files\LABELS\CIT Labels Gtywide.docx Last Update:01 27 14 •ALEXANDER CRAGHEAD JULIE RUSSELL, CPO 4B CHAIR 12205 SW HALL BOULEVARD 12662 SW TERRAVIEW DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223-6210 TIGARD OR 97224 GENE MILDREN BRAD SPRING MILDREN DESIGN GROUP 7555 SW SPRUCE STREET 7650 SW BEVELAND ST, STE 120 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 NATHAN AND ANN MURDOCK CHARLIE AND LARIE STAIZER 7415 SW SPRUCE STREET 14781 SW JULIET TERRACE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 PATTY NEWTH ROSS SUNDBERG 12180 SW MERESTONE COURT 16382 SW 104TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 TODD HARDING&BLAKE HERING JR. WILLIAM S. FARGHER NORRIS BEGGS&SIMPSON EQUITY BUILDERS REALTY 121 SW MORRISON,SUITE 200 10300 SW 92ND AVENUE PORTLAND OR 97204 HAPPY VALLEY OR 97086 DAVID WALSH GLENNA THOMPSON 10236 SW STUART COURT 13676 SW HALL BLVD UNIT 2 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 SUE RORMAN BRIAN WEGENER 11250 SW 82ND AVE 9830 SW KIMBERLY DRIVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 LISA HAMILTON CPO 4B VICE CHAIR CAROL RENAUD—WACO CPO NEWSLETTER COORD. 13565 SW BEEF BEND ROAD OSU EXTENSION SVC-CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACULTY TIGARD OR 97224 155 NORTH 157 AVENUE SUITE 200 MS48 HILLSBORO OR 97124 JULIE RUSSELL CHAIR CPO 4B CHAIR JIM LONG, CHAIR,CPO 4M 16200 SW PACIFIC HWY SUITE H BOX 242 10730 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97223 :URPLN\Setup-Land Use FIIes\LABELS\CIT Labels Citywide.docx Last Update:0127 14 e NEAL BROWN.GRI DAVID KIMMEL MEADOWS INC REALTORS 1335 SW 66TH SUITE 201 12655 SW NORTH DAKOTA STREET PORTLAND OR 97225 TIGARD OR 97223 PLANNING COMMISSION (ALT)JOHN GOODHOUSE VICTOR DEFILIPPIS 9345 SW MOUNTAIN VIEW LANE 13892 SW BRAYDON CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 DAYLE D.& EVELYN 0. BEACH 11530 SW 72ND AVENUE TIGARD OR 97223 \CURPLN\Setup-Land Use Files\LABELS\CIT Labels Citywide.docx Last Update:01 27 14 "FOR COUNCIL NEWSLETTER" (Sent on 8/22/2014) LAND USE PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION TIGARD 120 DAYS = 12/17/2014 FILE NOS.: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 2014-00003 FILE TITLE: RETAIL AT SHADY LANE APPLICANT: MAJ Development Corp APPLICANT'S Mackenzie c/o Mike Jenkins REP: c/o Ryan Shera 300 West 15th Street, Suite 200 1515 SE Water Avenue, Suite 100 Vancouver,WA 98660 Portland, OR 97214 OWNER: Stanley and Audene Nored 511 NEE 21"Place Canby, OR 97013 REQUEST: The applicant requests redevelopment of a 0.44 acre parcel located at 9785 SW Shady Lane from a former gas station/playground equipment store into a drive-through coffee shop with associated site improvements. LOCATION: 9785 SW Shady Lane;Washington County Tax Map 1S135BD,Tax Lot 00200. ZONE/ COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: MUC: mixed use commercial district. The MUC zoning district includes land around the Washington Square Mall and land immediately west of Highway 217. Primary uses permitted include office buildings, retail, and service uses. Also permitted are mixed-use developments and housing at densities of 50 units per acre. Larger buildings are encouraged in this area with parking under,behind or to the sides of buildings. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, 18.520, 18.630, 18.705, 18.725, 18.745, 18.755, 18.765, 18.780, 18.790, 18.795 and 18.810. DECISION MAKING BODY BELOW: ❑ TYPE I ® TYPE II El TYPE III ❑ TYPE IV COMMENTS WERE SENT: August 21, 2014 COMMENTS ARE DUE: September 4,2014 ❑HEARINGS OFFICER (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM ❑PLANNING COMMISSION (MON.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 PM El CITY COUNCIL (TUES.) DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PM STAFF DECISION (TENTATIVE) DATE OF DECISION: October 9,2014 COMPONENTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION ® VICINITY MAP ® DRAINAGE PLAN ® IMPACT STUDY ® SITE PLAN ® STORM WATER ANALYSIS ® TRAFFIC STUDY IE] NARRATivi:, [2] TREE PLAN Ell OTHER: MISCELLANEOUS STAFF CONTACT: Gary Pagenstecher,Associate Planner (503) 718-2434 VICINITY MAP SDR2014-00003 96e° 9600 '.161.11.1 ' RETAIL AT SHADY LANE 9600 - gGOO Otbrin g6D1-1 5600 oF.nri 96"-9600 qhrin D600 n I ithCS 765 1070 Subject Site 1D nma /11111111111111111111 gi35 97,5 7G'.. AMMINIME gin 9715 41111111MEM111 4111110111,111111111111 9735 4735 .„, Hr_SD t„; 11111111111 9735 uf,._Na_.._.a_. immoosimpsew 1,11/P3 41111111y11 u 9E04 0/80 ,70 - n 9781] 9780 9 fliU 1.111165 .1-Uti AU 11 AM 10119', rre 41).'s'b 0 : C (IC 5,5 ENENIN. APPLICANT MATERIALS RECEVED UN 042014 CITY OF TIGARD City of Tigard ('CANNING;�_NGINEERING Land Use Permit Application PRE-APP.HELD BY: TIGARD. mea File# 5DR20W-00003 Other Case# Date 6(412°I y By TYI(—� I Receipt# Fee Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑Adjustment/Variance(II) El Historic Overlay(II or III) ®Site Development Review(II) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑Home Occupation(II) ❑Subdivision(II or III) ❑ Conditional Use(III) ❑Minor Land Partition(II) ❑ Zone Change(III) El Development Code Amendment(IV) El Planned Development(III) ❑ Zone Change Annexation(IV) ❑Downtown Design Review(II,III) El Sensitive Lands Review(II or III) NOTE: FOR REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS,PLEASE REFER TO YOUR PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES LOCATION WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY\VILL OCCUR(Address if available) 9785 SW Shady Lane TAX MAPS&TAX LOT NOS. R272868 - 1S135BD 00200 TOTAL SITE SIZE ZONING CLASSIFICATION 0 .44 AC Mixed Use Commercial (MUC) APPLICANT' MAJ Development Corp MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 300 West 15th Street, Suite 200 Vancouver, WA 98660 PHONE NO. FAX NO. 360-823-5102 PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON PHONE NO. Mike Jenkins E-MAIL mikej@majdevelopment .com PROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER(Attach list if more than one) Stanley & Audene Nored MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 511 NE 21st P1 Canby, OR 97013 PHONE NO. FAX NO. *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) Redevelop former gas station/playground equipment store into drive-through coffee- shop with associated site improvements . City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 2 THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. i The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. Af MI it 10 ,hofr • s Signa Date. I 3, t Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date ,b41) Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date - 1 4 MACKENZIE . RECE' VED !, DESIGN DRIVEN I CLIENT FOCUSED 'ti�i 1 9 ('911 1 �� LPA • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' TYPE II SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW To City of Tigard For 1 Shady Lane Drive-Through Submitted ' June 4, 2014 Revised 1 July 1,2014;August 13, 2014 Project Number 2130043.16 MACKENZIE Since 1960 RiverEast Center 1515 SE Water Ave,Suite 100,Portland,OR 97214 El PO Box 14310,Portland,OR 97293 I T 503 224 9560 I www.mcknze.com M M . TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROJECT SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION AND PROPOSAL 2 Site Description 2 Proposal 3 III. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS 4 18.360 Site Development Review 4 18.390 Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study 7 Impact Study 8 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts 9 1 18.630 Washington Square Regional Center Plan District 12 18.705 Access, Egress, and Circulation 17 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards 22 18.745 Landscaping & Screening Standards 23 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage 30 18.765 Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements 34 18.780 Signs 44 • 18.790 Urban Forestry Plan 44 • 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas 46 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards 47 • IV. SUMMARY 55 EXHIBITS A. Application Form and Check(1) B. Site Aerial,Vicinity Map, and Zoning Map(3) C. Full-Size Plans (Folded) (3) D. Reduced Size Plans(8.5"x11") (3) E. CWS Service Provider Letter(3) F. Traffic Impact Study(3) G. Neighborhood Meeting Materials(3) H. Preliminary Storm Report(3) Iry AO' �� � , iie H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-0tyofTigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.dom M . 1 I. PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant: Mike Jenkins MAJ Development Corporation 300 West 15th Street,Suite 200 Vancouver,WA 98660 Applicant's Representative/ Mackenzie Project Contact: Ryan Schera, Land Use Planner rschera@mcknze.com 1515 SE Water Avenue,Suite 100 Portland, OR 97214 (503) 224-9560 Site Address: 9785 SW Shady Lane Tigard, Oregon Lot Size: 19,166 SF (0.44 acres) Tax Map/Lots: R272868- 1S135BD 00200 Zone: Mixed Use Commercial (MUC) Plan District: Washington Square Regional Center Plan District Request: Type II Site Development Review approval for a drive- ' through coffee shop and associated site improvements Applicable Criteria: 18.360 Site Development Review 1 18.390 Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts 18.630 Washington Square Regional Center 18.705 Access/Egress/Circulation 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 Landscaping&Screening Standards 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage 1 18.765 Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements 18.780 Signs 18.790 Urban Forestry Plan 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas 18.810 Street& Utility Improvement Standards H:\Protects\213004316\WP\RPT{iryouTigarcl-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.dom 1 M m II. INTRODUCTION AND PROPOSAL This application package includes narrative, plans, drawings, and additional documentation in support of a Type Il Site Development Review for the redevelopment of the site at 9785 SW Shady Lane. MAJ Development is the applicant, developer, and future owner. A pre-application meeting for this project was held on January 9, 2014. Recommendations from that meeting have been incorporated into the proposal. Site Description The subject site is located at the southwest corner of SW Shady Lane and SW Greenburg Road. The site is zoned Mixed Use Commercial (MUC) and is in the Washington Square Regional Center Plan District. The site is currently vacant, but was most recently used for a playground equipment store and associated parking/maneuvering area. The existing building on the site was originally a gas station. The proposed grocery store would utilize the existing building and part of the parking area, and would involve the addition of a drive-through lane within the existing parking area boundary. The aerial map below shows the project area and existing development, as well as the tax lot lines, which are not proposed to change with the new development. Figure 11.1 Aerial Map sr ;',,, , : - 7r- " 4, f-,e,,,4';':,,,,,74:: '*(7,,;„::::: ' 1 1 ,,� ' i1it w . € '''''f' ' , ' '\'' ''''-',--,4• 1, /41,,, lift,. , sA, 1 r- )',tat _. o -i y aa .ym a/ H:\Projects\21.3004316\WP\RPT-Oty ofTigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 2 MI M . ' Proposal ' This application requests a Type II Site Development Review approval to accommodate a drive-through coffee shop and associated parking. 11 I I I I I 1 I I I I I H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT1'ity of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doo 3 M M . III. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS 18.360 Site Development Review 18.360.090 Approval Criteria The director shall make a finding with respect to each of the following criteria when approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application: A. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title, including Chapter 18.810, Street and Utility Standards; Response:The standards of Chapter 18.810 are addressed in that section of this narrative.All applicable requirements of the title are met. B. Relationship to the natural and physical environment—Nonresidential development. 1. Buildings shall be: a. Located to preserve existing trees, topography and natural drainage where possible based upon existing site conditions; b. Located in areas not subject to ground slumping or sliding; c. Located to provide adequate distance between adjoining buildings for adequate light, air circulation, and fire fighting; and d. Oriented with consideration for sun and wind. Response: This application is for the renovation of an existing building and site; no newly constructed buildings or lot reconfiguration is proposed.This standard does not apply. 2. Innovative methods and techniques to reduce impacts to site hydrology and fish and wildlife habitat shall be considered based on surface water drainage patterns, identified per Section 18.810.100.A.3 and the City of Tigard "Significant Habitat Areas Map." Methods and techniques for consideration may include, but are not limited to the following: a. Water quality facilities(for infiltration, retention, detention and/or treatment); b. Pervious pavement; c. Soil amendment; d. Roof runoff controls; e. Fencing to guide animals toward safe passageways; f. Re-directed outdoor lighting to reduce spill-off into habitat areas; g. Preservation of existing vegetative and canopy cover. Response: This application is for the renovation of an existing building and developed site; no fish and wildlife habitat exist on the site.This standard does not apply. C. Exterior elevations. 1. Along the vertical face of single-family attached and multiple family structures, offsets shall occur at a minimum of every 30 feet by providing any two of the following:... Response:This proposal is for a commercial project; no residential uses are included.This standard does not apply. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-aity of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.dooc 4 M M . ' D. Buffering,screening and compatibility between adjoining uses—Nonresidential development. 1. Nonresidential development shall provide buffering between different types of land uses for example, between commercial and industrial uses and residential and commercial uses—and the following factors shall be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the buffer: a. The purpose of the buffer, for example to decrease noise levels, absorb air pollution,filter dust, or to provide a visual barrier; ' b. The size of the buffer required to achieve the purpose in terms of width and height; c. The direction(s)from which buffering is needed; ' d. The required density of the buffering; and e. Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile. Response: The site is surrounded on all sides by other MUC-zoned properties and other ' commercial uses; no buffering between different types of uses is required. However, as shown in the attached plans, buffering will be provided between the site and adjacent lot and streets. Buffering and screening standards relevant to the site are addressed in section 18.745.050 of this narrative. ' 2. On-site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, , storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops, i.e., air cooling and heating systems, shall be provided and the following factors will be considered in determining the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening: a. What needs to be screened; b. The direction from which it is needed; c. How dense the screen needs to be; d. Whether the viewer is stationary or mobile;and e. Whether the screening needs to be year around. Response: As shown in the attached plans, screening will be provided on the site for the trash and recycling storage area. Buffering and screening standards relevant to the site are addressed in section 18.745.050 of this narrative. E. Private outdoor area—Multifamily use... Response:This proposal is for a commercial project; no residential uses are included.This standard does not apply. F. Shared outdoor recreation areas—Multifamily use... Response:This proposal is for a commercial project; no residential uses are included.This standard does not apply. H. Demarcation of public, semi-public and private spaces for crime prevention—Nonresidential development. 1. The structures and site improvements shall be designed so that public areas such as streets or public gathering places, semi-public areas and private outdoor areas are clearly defined to establish persons having a right to be in the space, to provide for crime prevention and to establish maintenance responsibility; and 2. These areas may be defined by, but not limited to: a. A deck, patio, low wall, hedge, or draping vine, b. A trellis or arbor, c. A change in elevation or grade, H:\Projects\233004316\WP\RPT{RyofTiigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 5 M M . ' d. A change in the texture of the path material, e. Sign, or If. Landscaping. Response: As shown in the attached plans, the proposed site improvements include an approximately 17.5'-deep, maximum 46.8'-wide plaza in front of the building,to be used by patrons of the coffee shop. ' Signs, landscaping surrounding the building and parking areas, and contrasting pavement walkways will also be provided.This standard is met. Il. Crime prevention and safety—Nonresidential development. 1. Windows shall be located so that areas vulnerable to crime can be surveyed by the occupants; 2. Interior service areas shall be located in a way that they can be observed by others; 3. Mailboxes shall be located in lighted areas having vehicular or pedestrian traffic; 4. The exterior lighting levels shall be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime;and 5. Light fixtures shall be provided in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic and in potentially dangerous areas such as parking lots, stairs, ramps and abrupt grade ' changes. Fixtures shall be placed at a height so that light patterns overlap at a height of seven feet which is sufficient to illuminate a person. Response: This application is for the renovation of an existing building and developed site; no reconfiguration of the building orientation is proposed. Site elements such as parking, walkways, and landscaping will be located prominently between the building and street and will be lit by pole lighting at two locations (see C2.1), as well as building lighting (see Elevations) and existing street lighting on SW ' Shady Lane.This standard is met. J. Public transit. ' 1. Provisions within the plan shall be included for providing for transit if the development proposal is adjacent to or within 500 feet of existing or proposed transit route; 2. The requirements for transit facilities shall be based on: a. The location of other transit facilities in the area, and b. The size and type of the proposal; 3. The following facilities may be required after city and Tri-Met review: a. Bus stop shelters, b. Turnouts for buses, and Ic. Connecting paths to the shelters. Response: The subject site is slightly more than 100' from a bus route. However, this application is for the renovation of an existing building and developed site, and the site was previously used for a similarly ' intensive retail use. (See attached Traffic Impact Study for more detail.) No modifications to the site's transit accesses are proposed.This standard does not apply. K. Landscaping. 1. All landscaping shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapters 18.745 and 18.790; Response: As discussed in those sections of this narrative, the project meets all the relevant standards of chapters 18.745 and 18.790.This standard is met. H:\Projects\21.3004316\WP\RPT-ity of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 6 M ■ 2. In addition to the open space and recreation area requirements of subsections E and F of this section, a minimum of 20% of the gross area including parking, loading and ' service areas shall be landscaped; and Response: This proposal is for a commercial project; no residential uses are included and the project is not subject to subsections E and F. This standard does not apply. The landscaping ' standards of the zone, overlay, and use are met. 3. A minimum of 15%of the gross site area shall be landscaped. Response:As shown in the attached plans, 31.4% of the site will be landscaped.This standard is met. L. Drainage. All drainage plans shall be designed in accordance with the criteria in the adopted 1981 master drainage plan. Response: The parking area drains to the existing catch basins in the southeast and southwest corners of the site. These catch basins will be replaced with Contech storm filter catch basins. This standard is met. M. Provision for the disabled. All facilities for the disabled shall be designed in accordance with the requirements set forth in ORS Chapter 447. Response: Facilities such as ADA parking, walkways, and ramps will be provided in accordance with code.This standard is met. N. All of the provisions and regulations of the underlying zone shall apply unless modified by other sections or this title; e.g., Planned Developments, Chapter 18.350, or a variance or adjustment granted under Chapter 18.370. Response: As discussed in this narrative, all relevant standards are addressed. No variance or adjustment is requested.This standard is met. 18.390 Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study 18.390.040 Type 11 Procedure A. Preapplication conference. A preapplication conference is required for Type II actions. Preapplication conference requirements and procedures are set forth in 18.390.080.C. Response: A preapplication conference was held for this project on January 9, 2014. This standard is met. B. Application requirements. 1. Application forms. Type II applications shall be made on forms provided by the director as provided by 18.390.080.E.1. Response: This application package includes the standard City of Tigard land use application form for decisions including Type II Site Development Review (included as exhibit A). This standard is met. 2. Submittal information. The application shall: a. Include the information requested on the application form; b. Address the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and action; c. Be accompanied by the required fee; d. Include two sets of pre-stamped and pre-addressed envelopes for all property owners of record as specified in subsection C of this section. The records of the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation are the official H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-0ty of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doo 7 M M . records for determining ownership. The applicant shall demonstrate that the most current assessment records have been used to produce the notice list; e. Include an impact study. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system, and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet city standards and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the community development code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirements, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Response: This submittal includes all the items required in the application form, relevant code criteria, current fee schedule, stamped and addressed envelopes, and impact study(below).This standard is met. Impact Study Public Facilities and Services • Improvements Necessary to Meet City Standards: Street trees will be installed on the site frontage on SW Shady Lane. ■ Improvements Necessary to Minimize the Impact on Public at Large/Public Facilities:Street trees will be installed on the site frontage on SW Shady Lane. Transportation System, Including Bikeways • Improvements Necessary to Meet City Standards: As demonstrated in the attached traffic study, no mitigation or improvements are required. • Improvements Necessary to Minimize the Impact on Public at Large/Public Facilities: As demonstrated in the attached traffic study, no mitigation, or improvements are required. Drainage System • Improvements Necessary to Meet City Standards: Drainage systems will be improved in the parking area; it drains to the existing catch basins in the southeast and southwest corners of the site and these will be replaced with Contech storm filter catch basins. • Improvements Necessary to Minimize the Impact on Public at Large/Public Facilities: The drainage system will be improved with new catch basins. Parks System ■ Improvements Necessary to Meet City Standards: The project does not include parks or any impacts to parks. • Improvements Necessary to Minimize the Impact on Public at Large/Public Facilities:The project does not include parks or any impacts to parks. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RP-Oty of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.docx 8 M M . Water System • Improvements Necessary to Meet City Standards: This application is for the renovation of an existing building and site. Water service currently available to the existing building will be used. No system water improvements are necessary. • Improvements Necessary to Minimize the Impact on Public at Large/Public Facilities: Water service currently available to the existing building will be used. No system water improvements are necessary. Sewer System _ • Improvements Necessary to Meet City Standards: This application is for the renovation of an existing building and site. Sewer service currently available to the existing building will be used and a grease interceptor will be added on the west site of the building to tie into existing lateral (see C2.3) to assist with additional waste anticipated by the proposed use (drive-through coffee shop). • Improvements Necessary to Minimize the Impact on Public at Large/Public Facilities: Sewer service currently available to the existing building will be used and a grease interceptor will be added on the west site of the building to tie into existing lateral (see C2.3) to assist with additional waste anticipated by the proposed use (drive-through coffee shop). Noise Impacts • Improvements Necessary to Meet City Standards: The project involves conversion of an existing commercial site to a drive-through coffee shop. No noise impacts are expected and no noise- related improvements are necessary to meet City standards. • Improvements Necessary to Minimize the Impact on Public at Large/Public Facilities: No noise impacts are expected and no noise-related public improvements are necessary. No private property users will be affected by the development and all development will occur on the subject property or right-of-way in front of the site (street trees). No dedication of property is required. 18.520 Commercial Zoning Districts 18.520.030 Uses A. Types of uses. For the purposes of this chapter, there are four kinds of use: 1. A permitted (P) use is a use which is permitted outright, but subject to all of the applicable provisions of this title. If a use is not listed as a permitted use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Section 18.130.030. 2. A restricted (R) use is permitted outright providing it is in compliance with special requirements, exceptions or restrictions. 3. A conditional (C) use is a use the approval of which is at the discretion of the Hearings Officer. The approval process and criteria are set forth in Chapter 18.370. If a use is not listed as a conditional use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Section 18.130.030. 4. A prohibited (N) use is one which is not permitted in a zoning district under any circumstances. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-CrtyofTigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 9 M M . 8. Use table. A list of permitted, restricted, conditional and prohibited uses in commercial zones is presented in Table 18.520.1. TABLE 18.520.1 USE TABLE:COMMERCIAL ZONES USE CATEGORY MUMS.' Proposed COMMERCIAL Commercial Lodging P Custom Arts and Crafts N Eating and Drinking Establishments P X Major Event Entertainment C Outdoor Entertainment C Indoor Entertainment P Adult Entertainment C Sales-Oriented P Personal Services P Repair-Oriented tzzj R Bulk Sales [22) R Outdoor Sales N Animal-Related N Motor Vehicle Sales/Rental [24j R Motor Vehicle Servicing/Repair N Vehicle Fuel Sales C Office P Self-Service Storage N Non-Accessory Parking P [28]All Permitted and Conditional Uses subject to special development standards contained in Chapter 18.630. [22]New retail and sales uses may not exceed 60,000 gross leasable area per building within the Washington Square Regional Center or Tigard Triangle except for those areas zoned C-G at the time the MUE zoning district was adopted in the Tigard Triangle. [24]Permitted as accessory to a permitted use as long as this use is contained within the same building as the permitted use,and does not exceed the floor area of the permitted use. Response: This application proposes the use of an existing building and site for an Eating and Drinking Establishments > Fast Food use, as defined by Chapter 18.765: "Fast food designation includes all eating and drinking establishments with a 'walk-up counter' or less than 10 tables in the dining area." The coffee shop use will have less than 10 tables in its small dining area.This use is allowed. C. Accessory structures. 1. Accessory structures are permitted in all commercial zones providing the site is still in compliance with all development standards, including but not limited to setbacks, height, lot coverage and landscaping requirements, of the base zone. All accessory structures shall comply with all requirements of the state building code. Response: This application is for renovation of an existing building and site; no accessory structures exist or are proposed.This standard does not apply. 2. All freestanding and detached towers, antennas, wind-generating devices and TV receiving dishes, except as otherwise regulated by Chapter 18.798, Wireless Communication Facilities, shall have setbacks equal to or greater than the height of the 111 proposed structure. Suitable protective anti-climb fencing and a landscaped planting screen, in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening, shall be provided and maintained around these structures and accessory attachments. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPTfiRy of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 10 I M . Response: This application is for renovation of an existing commercial building and site; no wireless communication facilities exist or are proposed.This standard does not apply. I18.520.040 Development Standards A. Compliance required.All development must comply with: I1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with I Chapter 18.370; 2. All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. Response: As demonstrated in this narrative, all of the relevant code sections are addressed for this Iproject.The project complies with all of the applicable development standards. B. Development standards. Development standards in commercial zoning districts are contained in I Table 18.520.2 below: TABLE 18.520.2 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS I STANDARD MUC [17)(18) Proposed Minimum Lot Size None 0.44 AC I -Detached unit - -Boarding,lodging,rooming house - Minimum Lot Width None 106' Minimum Setbacks I -Front yard 0 ft�l'i 80' -Side facing street on corner&through lots/11 06119) 40' Side yard rllellzoi 18' -Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district l _ N/A I -Rear yard Olvltzol 13' Distance between front of garage&property line abutting a public N/A N/A or private street. Minimum Building Height 2 stories 1 story I Maximum Building Height 200 ft 16' Maximum Site Coverage(21 85% 68.4% Minimum Landscape Requirement 15% 31.4% Minimum FAR(31 1.25 N/A I (41!5)(6] Minimum Residential Density 50 N/A unit/acre Maximum Residential Densityl41151f61tn None N/A I [1] The provisions of Chapter 18.795(Vision Clearance)must be satisfied. [2] Includes all buildings and impervious surfaces. [3] Applies to all nonresidential building development and mixed use development which includes a residential component. In mixed use development,residential floor area is included in the calculations of floor area ratio to determine conformance with minimum FAR. I [4] Notwithstanding the requirements of Section 18.715.020,minimum and maximum density shall be determined for residential only projects using the number of residential units per acre shown in the above table. The provisions for density transfer described in 18.715.030.8 apply,using the minimum and maximum density shown in the above table.Any mixed-use or commercial only development does not have a minimum density requirement. I [5] For purposes of determining floor area ratio and residential densities, the net development area shall be uses to establish the lot area, determined per 18.715.020.A. [6] Adjustments to minimum density in the Washington Square Regional center area subject to the standards set forth in 18.630.020.E. [17] Modifications to dimensional and minimum density requirements for developments that include or abut designated Water Resources I Overlay District Riparian setbacks per Chapter 18.797 are described in 18.630.040.F. [18] The requirements contained in the Buffer Matrices in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2 shall be used in calculating widths of buffering/screening and required improvement s to be installed between proposed uses in the MUC, MUE and MUR zones within the Washington Square Regional Center(WSRC)and abutting zoning districts not included within the WSRC, or zoning districts within the I WSRC which are not mixed-use.For MUC and MUE zones,the requirements for Commercial Zones apply.For MUR zones,the requirements for the Neighborhood Commercial Zone apply. [19] For Commercial and Mixed-use developments, the maximum front and street side yard setback is 10 feet. For Residential only developments,the maximum front and street side yard setback is 20 feet. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-OtyofTiigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 11 1 IA M . 1 [20) Side and rear yard setbacks shall be 20 feet when the zone abuts residential districts shown in Section 18.510.020 except R-25 and R-40. Response: No changes to the site size or width are proposed. The modifications to the exterior of the building will not bring the site out of compliance with any of the relevant standards As shown in the table above, the improvements will result in an overall landscaping percentage of 31.4%, well above the 15% requirement.These standards are met. 1 18.520.050 Special Limitations on Uses E. In the MUC, MUE-1, MUE-2, MUR-1 and MUR-2 zones. Within the Washington Square Regional Center, the standards of Chapter 18.630 shall also apply. Response: The site is located in the MUC zone. As such, the standards of Chapter 18.630 are addressed in that portion of this narrative. 18.520.060 Additional Development and Design Guidelines C. Washington Square Regional Center. See Chapter 18.630 for additional development and design guidelines. Response:The standards of Chapter 18.630 are addressed in that portion of this narrative. ' 18.630 Washington Square Regional Center Plan District 18.630.020 Development Standards A. Compliance required. All development must comply with: 1. All applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except ' where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapter 18.370 and subsections C through E of this section; 2. All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. ' Response: No variances or adjustments are requested. The attached plans fully comply with all of the relevant code sections and applicable development standards. The landscaped setback abutting the parking area and drive-through lane has been changed to be 8' in width, in full compliance with ' 18.630.050.E.2.This standard is met. B. Development standards. Development standards which apply within mixed-use zones in the Washington Square Regional Center Plan District are contained in Table 18.520.2. Existing developments which do not meet the standards specified for a particular district may continue in existence and be altered subject to the provisions of Section 18.630.030. 1 Response: The subject site is located within the MUC zone in the Washington Square Regional Center Plan District.Therefore, the standards of Table 18.520.2 are addressed in this narrative. This application is for renovation of an existing building and site which are currently in conformance with the standards of the district, except for the 8' parking lot setback standard of 18.630.050.E.2. The existing site will be modified to provide the required 8' setback. The provisions of Section 18.630.030 are addressed in this narrative; response to 18.630.050.E.2. has been modified for the new, fully conforming site plan and is 1 provided in this letter.This standard is met. C. Phasing of development standards. Projects may use the site development review process (Chapter 18.360) to develop a site by phasing compliance with the development standards established in this chapter. Such projects must demonstrate how future development of the site, to the minimum development standards established in this chapter or greater, can be achieved at ultimate build out of the site. The planning director may waive or modify the approval period (18.360.030.C) and phased development time schedule (18.360.030.E.1)for projects approved H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT.Oty ofTigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 12 M M . under this section. If a time period greater than that specified in 18.360.030.0 is necessary, it must be requested at the time of original application with a detailed time line for completion. Response:This application is for the renovation of an existing building and site through a standard Type II Site Development Review. This application does not propose using the site development review process to develop the site further by phasing compliance with the development standards. This standard does not apply. D. Density requirements for developments including or abutting riparian setback. ... Response: The subject site does not include or abut a riparian setback, and does not include residential uses subject to density requirements.This standard does not apply. E. Adjustments to density requirements in the Washington Square Regional Center Plan District... Response: The subject site does not include residential uses subject to density requirements. This standard does not apply. F. Modifications to dimensional and minimum density requirements for developments that include or abut designated water resources overlay district riparian setbacks... Response:The subject site does not include or abut designated water resources overlay district riparian setbacks, and does not include residential uses.This standard does not apply. _ 18.630.030 Pre-Existing Uses and Developments within the Washington Square Regional Center Plan District Mixed Use Districts A. Applicability. Pre-existing housing units in mixed use districts are permitted. Conversion of pre- existing housing units to other uses is subject to the requirements of this chapter. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 18.760.040, uses prohibited and structures that would be nonconforming in any of the regional center mixed use zoning districts that were lawfully in existence at the time of adoption of the regional center mixed use districts are considered to be approved uses and structures. However,future additions, expansions, or enlargements to such uses or structures, shall be limited to the property area and use lawfully in existence at the time ' of adoption of this ordinance, February 22, 2002. Response:The existing use, structure, and site layout are assumed to have been lawfully in existence at the time of adoption of the regional center mixed use districts, and are thus considered approved uses and structures.This application proposes an expansion of 41 SF to the existing building. 1. An addition, expansion, or enlargement of such lawfully preexisting uses and structures ' up to 20% of the gross floor area lawfully in existence at the time of adoption of this ordinance will be allowed provided the applicant of such proposed addition, expansion or enlargement demonstrates substantial compliance with all appropriate development ' standards in this code, or that the applicant demonstrates that the purposes of applicable development standards are addressed to the extent that the proposed addition, expansion or enlargement allows. Response: The proposed expansion is for an additional 41 SF to the existing 2,035 SF building, representing a 2%increase in area.This standard is met. 2. All additions, expansions, or enlargements of existing uses or structures that take place after using the 20% addition, expansion, or enlargement exception shall be in conformance with the development standards of this code. Projects may use the site development review process (Chapter 18.360) to develop a site by phasing compliance with the development standards established in this chapter per 18.630.020.C. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT{ity of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 13 M M . Response: The proposed expansion represents only a 2% increase in area. This standard does not apply. 1 3. If a pre-existing use is destroyed by fire, earthquake or other act of God, then the use will retain its pre-existing status under this provision so long as it is substantially ' reestablished within three years of the date of the loss. The reestablished use shall be in conformance with the development standards of this code. Projects may use the site development review process (Chapter 18.360) to develop a site by phasing compliance ' with the development standards established in this chapter per 18.630.020.C. Response:The previous use has not been destroyed by fire, earthquake, or other act of God and is in stable condition.This standard does not apply. r18.630.040 Street Connectivity A. Purpose. The standards provide a way for creating continuity and connectivity within the Washington Square regional center (WSRC). They provide incremental street and accessway development that is consistent with WSRC needs and regional and state planning principles for connectivity. The primary objective is to create a balanced, connected transportation system that 1 distributes trips within the WSRC on a variety of streets. Response: This application is for the renovation of a previously developed building and site; no new streets or accessways are proposed or required.This section does not apply. 1 18.630.050 Site Design Standards Compliance. All development must meet the following site design standards. If a parcel is one acre or ' larger a phased development plan may be approved demonstrating how these standards for the overall parcel can be met. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in Section 18.370.010.C.2, governing criteria for granting a variance, is satisfied. Response: As demonstrated in this narrative, the project meets the site design standards. The parcel is less than one acre in size and is previously developed; no phased development plan is proposed. This narrative demonstrates compliance with all applicable standards. A. Building placement on major and minor arterials. 1. Purpose. Architecture helps define the character and quality of a street and can make a 1 strong statement about the overall community and city at large. The placement and design of buildings provides the framework for the streetscape and defines the edges of the public right-of-way. Architecture and ground floor uses can activate the street, either by its design presence or by those who come and go from it.At intersections, investing in building frontages can create gateways and special places that add to the character of the area. 2. Standard. Buildings shall occupy a minimum of 50% of all street frontages along major and minor arterial streets. Buildings shall be located at public street intersections on major and minor arterial streets. Response:The site is not located on an arterial street.This standard does not apply. B. Building setback. 1. Purpose. Buildings and investment in architecture is most conspicuous when it is visible from the street. The presence of buildings closely sited at the edge of the right-of-way creates an envelope for the street and a sense of permanence. H:\Projects\2130D4316\WP\RPT-0tyof Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 14 IM ■ 2. Standard. The minimum and maximum building setback from public street rights-of-way shall be in accordance with Table 18.520.2. Response: There are no minimum or maximum building setbacks for the zone, according to Table 18.520.2. ' C. Front yard setback design. 1. Purpose. The front yard is the most conspicuous face of a building and requires special attention. Places for people and pedestrian movement helps create an active and safer street. Higher level of landscape anticipates a more immediate visual result. 2. Standard. For setbacks greater than 0 feet, landscaping, an arcade, or a hard-surfaced expansion of the pedestrian path must be provided between a structure and a public street or accessway. If a building abuts more than one street, the required improvements shall be provided on all streets. Landscaping shall be developed to the applicable standard in subsection E of this section. Hard-surfaced areas shall be constructed with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Benches and other street furnishings are encouraged. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per 18.520.040.8 and Table 18.520.2. Response:The required setback on the site is 0'.This standard does not apply. However, improvements are provided in the front yard of the site (between the building and SW Shady Lane) including L-1 landscaping and a hard-surfaced scored paving pedestrian walkway, as shown in the attached plans. D. Walkway connection to building entrances. 1. Purpose. As density increases and employee and resident populations increase, it is expected that more people will move between businesses within the WSRC. Provisions should be made to encourage people to walk from business to business, and housing to business rather than use automobiles. 2. Standard. A walkway connection is required between a building's entrance and a public street or accessway. This walkway must be at least six feet wide and be paved with scored concrete or modular paving materials. Building entrances at a corner adjacent to a public street intersection are required. These areas shall contribute to the minimum landscaping requirement per 18.520.040.8 and Table 18.520.2. Response: As shown in the attached plans, a walkway connection will be provided between the building and SW Shady Lane and between the building and the parking area (across the drive-through lane). This walkway will be 6' wide and will be constructed of contrasting paving materials.This standard is met. E. Parking location and landscape design. 1. Purpose. The emphasis on pedestrian access and a high quality streetscape experience requires that private parking lots that abut public streets should not be the predominant street feature. Where parking does abut public streets, high quality landscaping should screen parking from adjacent pedestrian areas. 2. Standard. Parking for buildings or phases adjacent to public street rights-of-way must be located to the side or rear of newly constructed buildings. When buildings or phases are adjacent to more than one public street, primary street(s) shall be identified by the city where this requirement applies. In general, streets with higher functional classification will be identified as primary streets unless specific design or access factors favor another street. If located on the side, parking is limited to 50%of the primary street frontage. [...] H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPTfiCry ofTigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 15 IM M . When abutting public streets, parking must be behind a landscaped area constructed to an L-1 parking lot screen standard. The minimum depth of the L-1 landscaped area is eight feet or is equal to the adjacent building setback, whichever is greater. All other site landscaping shall be landscaped to an L-2 general landscaping standard. The L-1 and L-2 standards are more fully described in Section 18.630.090. Response:This narrative is for the renovation of an existing building and site; the existing site layout will be maintained, except the existing 5' landscape setback along the parking lot and drive-through lane on the SW Shady Lane frontage will be expanded to 8'.As shown in the attached revised plans,this area will provide L-1 landscaping.This standard is met. 18.630.060 Building Design Standards All new buildings constructed in the MUC, MUE and MUR zones within the WSRC shall comply with the following design standards. Variance to these standards may be granted if the criteria found in 18.370.010.C.2, criteria for granting a variance, is satisfied. Response:This proposal is for renovation of an existing building and associated site improvements. This section does not apply. 18.630.070 Signs A. Sign standards. In addition to the requirements of Chapter 18.780 of the Development Code the following standards shall be met: 1. Zoning district regulations. Residential only developments within the MUC, MUE and MUR zones shall meet the sign requirements for the R-40 zone, 18.780.130.8; nonresidential developments within the MUC zone shall meet the sign requirements for • the commercial zones, 18.780.130.C; nonresidential development within the MUE zone shall meet the sign requirements of the C-P zone, 18.780.130.D and nonresidential development within the MUR zones shall meet the sign requirements of the C-N zone, 18.780.130.E. Response: The proposed project includes signage and drive-through menu boards, which meet the standards for commercial zones (18.780.130.C). The existing freestanding sign on the northwest corner of the site will remain and the graphics will be changed to reflect the new tenant. No prohibited sign styles are proposed. A new wall-mounted sign will replace old signage on the existing building, as shown on the attached Elevations sheet. The proposed parking area signs also comply.This standard is met. 2. Sign area limits. The maximum sign area limits found in Section 18.780.130 shall not be exceeded. No area limit increases will be permitted. Response:The existing freestanding sign on the northwest corner of the site will remain and the graphics will be changed to reflect the new tenant, using the existing sign area.This standard is met. 3. Height limits. The maximum height limit for all signs except wall signs shall be 10 feet. Wall signs shall not extend above the roofline of the wall on which the sign is located. No height increases will be permitted. 111 Response:The existing freestanding sign on the northwest corner of the site will remain and the graphics will be changed to reflect the new tenant.The proposed wall sign will be located on the existing brick sign pylon on the building and will not extend beyond it.This standard is met. 4. Sign location. Freestanding signs within the Washington Square regional center shall not be permitted within required L-1 landscape areas. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-City ofTigarc-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 16 M M . Response:As shown on the attached plans, the existing freestanding sign to be rebranded is not located within the required setback from parking areas (L-1 setback).This standard is met. ' 18.630.090 Landscaping and Screening Applicable levels. Two levels of landscaping and screening standards are applicable. The locations where the landscaping or screening is required and the depth of the landscaping or screening are defined in other subsections of this section. These standards are minimum requirements. Higher standards may be substituted as long as all height limitations are met. A. L-1 parking lot screen. The L-1 standard applies to setbacks on public streets. The L-1 standard is in addition to other standards in other chapters of this title. The setback shall be a minimum of eight feet between the parking lot and a public street. L-1 trees shall be considered parking lot trees and spaced between 30 and 40 feet on center within the setback. All L-1 trees shall be a minimum of 3%-inch caliper at the time of planting. Shrubs shall be of a variety that will provide a three-foot high screen and a 90%opacity within one year. Groundcover plants must fully cover the remainder of landscape area within two years. 8. L-2 general landscaping. The L-2 standard applies to all other trees and shrubs required by this ' chapter and Chapter 18.745 (except those required for the L-1 parking lot screen). For trees and shrubs required by Chapter 18.745, the L-2 standard is an additional standard. All L-2 trees shall be 2%-inch caliper at the time of planting. Shrubs shall be of a size and quality to achieve the ' required landscaping or screening effect within two years. Response:As shown in the attached plans, both L-1 and L-2 landscaping will be provided where required (see sheets L2.1 and L2.3). The attached plans show 3.5" caliper street trees in the SW Shady Lane frontage.This standard is met. 18.630.100 Street and Accessway Standards ' Functional classifications and street sections. The recommended roadway functional classification map and street cross-sections in the Washington Square regional center plan shall govern the improvement and construction of major streets within the Washington Square Regional Center Plan District. Response: The subject site is located on an improved neighborhood street. According to the pre-app notes of January 8, 2014, the street is currently in conformance and no street improvements will be required. 18.630.110 Design Evaluation The provisions of Section 18.620.090, Design Evaluation, apply within the Washington Square Regional Center Plan District. Response: This standard is understood. However, no request adjustments from the plan district design standards for the renovations to the existing site are proposed.This standard does not apply but will be met if it applies. ' 18.705 Access, Egress,and Circulation 18.705.030 General Provisions ' A. Continuing obligation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in this title are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the city. Response: The applicant will be responsible for providing and maintaining the access and egress for the site.This standard is met. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPr-aaty ofTigarc-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 17 M . B. Access plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Response: This application is for Site Development Review. The attached scaled site plan shows access and egress. The site plan will also be submitted with the building permit application. This standard is met. t C. Joint access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title, provided:... Response: The access and egress on the subject site will serve only the existing building; no joint access or egress is proposed.This standard does not apply. D. Public street access. All vehicular access and egress as required in 18.705.030.H and I shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the city for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Response: This application is for the renovation of an existing building and site which currently has access to SW Shady Lane; no changes to the site access or lot reconfiguration is proposed. This standard ' does not apply. E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with 18.810.030.N. Response:This application is for the renovation of an existing building and site; no changes to the site's access or lot reconfiguration is proposed. However, the existing access drive will be expanded to 30' wide to meet current City of Tigard commercial driveway standards, as addressed in this narrative. This standard is met. F. Required walkway location. On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: r1. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the ' streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments. Response: As shown in the attached plans (see site plan C2.1 and Elevations sheet), an on-site pedestrian walkway will connect the pedestrian plaza adjacent to the main entrance of the ' existing building to the parking area and SW Shady Lane frontage, with a 6' wide contrasting concrete pavement.This standard is met. 2. Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multifamily ' developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities. Response: This proposal is for a commercial project; no residential uses are included. This ' standard does not apply. 3. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six- ' H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-Oty of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.dooc 18 M M . inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum three-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, ' and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. Response: As shown in the attached plans (see C2.1), the walkway will be separated by a 6" vertical curb at the property line entering the parking lot, and will cross the parking area for a ' maximum of a 28' distance. Walkways crossing the parking area will be constructed of contrasting paving materials and will be 6' wide and in compliance with ADA standards (including ramps).This standard is met. ' 4. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, other pervious paving surfaces, etc. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Walkways may be required to • be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. Response: As shown in the attached plans (see C2.1), the walkways crossing the parking area will be constructed of contrasting paving materials. No pervious paving or soft-surfaced public ' use pathways are proposed. The pedestrian circulation system will be lit by building lighting on the south facade (see attached elevations), site lighting (two pole lights in the parking area with cutoff lenses, as shown on sheet C2.1), and existing street lighting.This standard is met. G. Inadequate or hazardous access. 1. Applications for building permits shall be referred to the commission for review when, in ' the opinion of the director, the access proposed: a. Would cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions;or b. Would provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles;or ' c. Would in any other way cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. 2. Direct individual access to arterial or collector streets from single-family dwellings and duplex lots shall be discouraged. Direct access to collector or arterial streets shall be considered only if there is no practical alternative way to access the site. If direct access is permitted by the city, the applicant will be required to mitigate for any safety or neighborhood traffic management (NTM) impacts deemed applicable by the city engineer. This may include, but will not be limited to, the construction of a vehicle ' turnaround on the site to eliminate the need for a vehicle to back out onto the roadway. 3. In no case shall the design of the service drive or drives require or facilitate the backward ' movement or other maneuvering of a vehicle within a street, other than an alley. Single- family and duplex dwellings are exempt from this requirement. Response: This application is for the renovation of an existing building and site which currently has ' access to SW Shady Lane, a neighborhood street; no changes to the site access or lot reconfiguration is proposed. No inadequate or hazardous access will result.This standard does not apply. ' H. Access management. 1. An access report shall be submitted with all new development proposals which verifies design of driveways and streets are safe by meeting adequate stacking needs, sight ' H:\Projects\21?004316\WI'RPT{Ry ofTigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.dooc 19 I M M . Idistance and deceleration standards as set by ODOT, Washington County, the city and AASHTO(depending on jurisdiction of facility). I Response: This application is for the renovation of an existing building and site; no new development is proposed.This standard does not apply. I 2. Driveways shall not be permitted to be placed in the influence area of collector or arterial street intersections. Influence area of intersections is that area where queues of traffic commonly form on approach to an intersection. The minimum driveway setback I from a collector or arterial street intersection shall be 150 feet, measured from the right- of-way line of the intersecting street to the throat of the proposed driveway. The setback may be greater depending upon the influence area, as determined from city engineer I review of a traffic impact report submitted by the applicant's traffic engineer. In a case where a project has less than 150 feet of street frontage, the applicant must explore any option for shared access with the adjacent parcel. If shared access is not possible or I practical, the driveway shall be placed as far from the intersection as possible. Response: This application is for the renovation of an existing building and site; no changes to the site's access or lot reconfiguration is proposed.The existing driveway is more than 150'from I the intersection of SW Shady Lane and SW Greenburg Road. This standard does not apply but is met. I 3. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along a collector shall be 200 feet. The minimum spacing of driveways and streets along an arterial shall be 600 feet. Response: This application is for the renovation of an existing building and site located on a I neighborhood street; no changes to the site's access or lot reconfiguration is proposed. The existing driveway is more than 150' from the intersection of SW Shady Lane and SW Greenburg Road.This standard does not apply but is met by the existing site configuration. 1 4. The minimum spacing of local streets along a local street shall be 125 feet. Response: This application is for the renovation of an existing building and site; no changes to the street spacing are proposed.This standard does not apply. II. Minimum access requirements for residential use.... Response:This proposal is for a commercial project; no residential uses are included.This standard does I not apply. J. Minimum access requirements for commercial and industrial use. 1 1. Vehicle access, egress and circulation for commercial and industrial use shall not be less than as provided in Table 18.705.3. I TABLE 18.705.3 VEHICULAR ACCESS/EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: COMMERCIAL AND Minimum Number of Minimum Access Minimum Pavement I INDUSTRIAL USES Driveways Required Width Required Parking Spaces I0-99 1 30' 24'curbs required 100+ 2 30' 24'curbs required Ior 50' 40'curbs required 1 H:\Projects\22034316\WP\RPT-iryofTigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 20 M M . Response: The building on the subject site will be used for commercial (drive-through/fast food eating and drinking establishment), and will require 7 parking spaces per 1,000 SF. For the completed 2,056 SF building, 14.392 parking spaces are required. Thus, according to Table 18.705.3, one driveway is required for the site. The site currently has one driveway access of only 24'; this application includes the installation of a standard City of Tigard commercial ' driveway, although no changes to the location of the driveway/vehicle access from SW Shady Lane are proposed.As shown in the attached plans, the proposed driveway will be 30' wide.This standard is met. ' 2. Vehicular access shall be provided to commercial or industrial uses, and shall be located to within 50 feet of the primary ground floor entrances; Response: As shown in the attached plans, the existing driveway is located more than 50' from the primary entrance.This standard is met. 3. Additional requirements for truck traffic may be placed as conditions of site development review. Response: This application is for the renovation of an existing building and site for a drive- ' through coffee shop use and a building of only 2,056' SF; no truck traffic is expected. However, this standard is understood. ' K. One-way vehicular access points. Where a proposed parking facility indicates only one-way traffic flow on the site, it shall be accommodated by a specific driveway serving the facility; the entrance drive shall be situated closest to oncoming traffic and the exit drive shall be situated farthest from oncoming traffic. Response: No one-way vehicular access points are proposed.This standard does not apply. L. Director's authority to restrict access. The director has the authority to restrict access when the ' need to do so is dictated by one or more of the following conditions: 1. To provide for increased traffic movement on congested streets and to eliminate turning movement problems, the director may restrict the location of driveways on streets and require the location of driveways be placed on adjacent streets, upon the finding that the proposed access would: ' a. b. Cause or increase existing hazardous traffic conditions;or Provide inadequate access for emergency vehicles;or c. Cause hazardous conditions to exist which would constitute a clear and present danger to the public health, safety, and general welfare. Response: This application is for the renovation of an existing building and site with existing access on one street (SW Shady Lane) and no accessible frontage on other streets.This standard does not apply. 2. To eliminate the need to use public streets for movements between commercial or industrial properties, parking areas shall be designed to connect with parking areas on adjacent properties unless not feasible. The Director shall require access easements between properties where necessary to provide for parking area connections; Response:This application is for the renovation of an existing building and site with one parking area and one building. No public street usage is required for movements between parts of the site and no access easements are required or proposed.This standard does not apply. H:\Projects\2L.1004316\WP\RPT-Crty of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.dooc 21 1 M . 1 3. To facilitate pedestrian and bicycle traffic, access and parking area plans shall provide efficient sidewalk and/or pathway connections, as feasible, between neighboring developments or land uses; Response:This application is for the renovation of an existing building and site with one parking area and one building; no neighboring developments or land uses are part of the project or adjacent to the site.This standard does not apply. 4. A decision by the director per paragraphs 1-3 of this subsection L may be appealed by means of a Type 11 procedure, as regulated by Section 18.390.040, using criteria contained in Section 18.370.020.C.3. Response:The above standards of this subsection do not apply, but this standard is understood. 18.725 Environmental Performance Standards 18.725.030 Performance Standards A. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 6.02.410 through 6.02.470 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Response:The standards of the Tigard Municipal Code will be met where they apply.This proposal is for the renovation of an existing site into a drive-through coffee shop and no substandard noises are expected.This standard is met. 8. Visible emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point-source ' emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070)apply. Response:This proposal is for the renovation of an existing site into a drive-through coffee shop and no visible emissions are expected.This standard is met. ' C. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. ' Response:This proposal is for the renovation of an existing site into a drive-through coffee shop and no vibrations are expected.This standard is met. D. Odors. The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Response:This proposal is for the renovation of an existing site into a drive-through coffee shop and no ' odors are expected.This standard is met. E. Glare and heat. No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high I , temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted;and 1. There shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source, and 2. These regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this ' title. H:\Projec[s\213004316\WP\RPT-City of Tigard-Type II See Development Review-140602 REV 2.dooc 22 M M . ' Response:This proposal is for the renovation of an existing site into a drive-through coffee shop and no glare or heat is expected, and no manufacturing will take place on-site.This standard is met. F. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or ' create a health hazard. Response: No wastes will be stored on-site other than trash and recycling in the designated trash enclosure, as shown on the attached plans, which will be picked up regularly by Pride Disposal. All grounds will be maintained and will not attract rodents or insects.This standard is met. 18.745 Landscaping&Screening Standards 18.745.030 General Provisions A. Maintenance responsibility. Unless otherwise provided by the lease agreement, the owner, tenant and his or her agent, if any, shall be jointly and severally responsible for the ongoing maintenance of all landscaping and screening used to meet the requirements of this chapter according to applicable industry standards. Response: The tenant will be responsible for the ongoing maintenance of landscaping and screening. This standard is met. ' B. Installation requirements. The installation of all landscaping and screening required by this chapter shall be as follows: 1. All landscaping and screening shall be installed according to applicable industry ' 2. standards; All plants shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nursery Stock(ANSI Z60, 1-2004, and any future revisions);and ' 3. All landscaping and screening shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. Response: As presented on the attached landscape plans, all landscaping and screening will meet these ' standards, as noted on sheet L2.3.This standard is met. C. Certificate of occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the requirements of this chapter have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the city such as the posting of a bond. Response:This standard is understood. D. Protection of existing plants. Existing plants on a site shall be protected as follows: 1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing plants to remain during the construction process; 2. The plants to remain shall be noted on the landscape plans (i.e., plants to remain can be shown as protected with fencing); and ' 3. The tree protection provisions outlined in Chapter 18.790 and the Urban Forestry Manual shall apply to the land use review types identified in Section 18.790.020.A. Response: As shown on the Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan (L2.0), developed in compliance with Section 10, Part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual, tree protection will be provided for the two trees that are near the project area,via fencing,on the front lot line.This standard is met. E. Ongoing tree-related rules and regulations. Any trees used to meet the requirements of this ' chapter shall be subject to all applicable tree-related rules and regulations in other chapters and titles of the Tigard Municipal Code and Tigard Development Code. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT{M1y of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.door 23 1 M . ' Response: This standard is understood and all trees used to meet the standards of this chapter will comply with both codes. ' 18.745.040 Street Tree Standards A. Street trees shall be required as part of the approval process for conditional use (Type Ill), ' downtown design review (Type 11 and Ill), minor land partition (Type II), planned development (Type 111),site development review(Type 11)and subdivision (Type II and 111)permits. Response: This is a Type II Site Development Review application; street trees are required. No street trees in the SW Shady Lane right-of-way currently exist in front of the site. As such, street trees will be provided and the standards of this section are addressed in this narrative, below.This standard is met. ' B. The minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet. When the result is a fraction, the minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by rounding to the nearest ' whole number. Response:The subject site has a street frontage on SW Shady Lane of 159.9' including the driveway.This represents a requirement of 3.9975 street trees. As shown in the attached landscape plans, four street trees will be provided.This standard is met. C. Street trees required by this section shall be planted according to the street tree planting ' standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. Response: As shown in the attached landscape plans (see L2.1 and L2.2), all street trees will conform to the standards of the Urban Forestry Manual.This standard is met. ' D. Street trees required by this section shall be provided adequate soil volumes according to the street tree soil volume standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. Response: As shown in the attached Parking Lot and Street Tree Canopy and Soil Volume Plan (L2.2), all street trees will conform to the standards of the Urban Forestry Manual and will have sufficient soil areas.This standard is met. E. Street trees required by this section shall be planted within the right-of-way whenever practicable according to the street tree planting standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. Street ' trees may be planted no more than six feet from the right-of-way according to the street tree planting standards in the Urban Forestry Manual when planting within the right-of-way is not practicable. Response: Because the proposed site design will utilize the existing right-of-way configuration and no street improvements are required (according to January 8, 2014 Development Engineering preapplication meeting notes by Mike McCarthy, City of Tigard),the only available area within the right- of-way for locating street trees is the 7.94' deep sidewalk along the frontage. According to the Urban Forestry Manual, for each street tree in an area this wide,400 cubic feet of soil is required for each tree. This cannot be provided within the right-of-way without significantly narrowing the sidewalk beyond ' compliance with City standards and ADA standards (also required according to the Development Engineering preapplication notes. As shown in the attached plans, the four street trees can be provided within 6' of the property line. Within in this area on the site currently, there are two trees which will be ' counted toward the number of street trees required. Two additional street trees will be planted. This standard is met. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-Oty of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 24 M . F. An existing tree may be used to meet the street tree standards provided that:... 1. The largest percentage of the tree trunk immediately above the trunk flare or root buttresses is either within the subject site or within the right-of-way immediately = adjacent to the subject site; Response: As shown on the attached plans (see L2.2 and L2.3), the existing trees to be used to meet the street tree standards are located within 6' of the property line, immediately adjacent to the right-of-way in front of the site.This standard is met. 2. The tree would be permitted as a street tree according to the street tree planting and e' soil volume standards in the Urban Forestry Manual if it were newly planted; and Response: As shown on the attached plans (see L2.2 and L2.3), the existing trees to be used to meet the street tree standards are on the City of Tigard street tree list and will meet the soil volume standards of the Urban Forestry Manual.This standard is met. 3. The tree is shown as preserved in the tree preservation and removal site plan (per 18.790.030.A.2), tree canopy cover site plan (per 18.790.030.A.3) and supplemental report (per 18.790.030.A.4) of a concurrent urban forestry plan and is eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. Response: As shown on the attached plans, the existing trees are shown on the Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan (L2.0), Tree Canopy Site Plan (L2.1), and Parking Lot and Street Tree Canopy and Soil Volume Plan (L2.2).This standard is met. G. In cases where it is not practicable to provide the minimum number of required street trees, the director may allow the applicant to remit payment into the urban forestry fund for tree planting and early establishment in an amount equivalent to the city's cost to plant and maintain a street tree for three years (per the street tree planting standards in the Urban Forestry Manual)for each tree below the minimum required. Response:The four required street trees will be provided.This standard does not apply. 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening A. General provisions. 1. It is the intent that these requirements shall provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution at a development site, without unduly interfering with the view from neighboring properties or jeopardizing the safety of pedestrians and vehicles. Response: The intent of the following requirements is understood and this section is addressed below. 2. Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation ' and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening, shall be required as specified in the matrix. Response: No buffer is required according to the buffer matrix (Table 18.745.1) for the project and zone. The subject site is located in the MUC zone, surrounded on all sides by other MUC- zoned properties. No buffering is required by the matrix for the use or parking lot from other properties or streets.This standard does not apply. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-Oty of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 25 M M . 3. In lieu of these standards, a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan may be submitted for the director's approval as an alternative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards, provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. Response: No alternatives to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards are required or requested.This standard does not apply. B. Buffering and screening requirements. 1. A buffer consists of an area within a required setback adjacent to a property line and having a depth equal to the amount specified in the buffering and screening matrix and containing a length equal to the length of the property line of the abutting use or uses. Response: No buffer is required according to the buffer matrix (Table 18.745.1) for the project and zone. The subject site is located in the MUC zone, surrounded on all sides by other MUC- zoned properties. No buffering is required by the matrix for the use or parking lot from other properties or streets.This standard does not apply. 2. A buffer area may only be occupied by utilities, screening, sidewalks and bikeways, and landscaping. No buildings, accessways or parking areas shall be allowed in a buffer area except where an accessway has been approved by the city. Response: No buffers are required on the site per the buffer matrix. This standard does not ' apply. 3. A fence, hedge or wall, or any combination of such elements, which are located in any yard is subject to the conditions and requirements of paragraph 6.8 and subsection D of this section. Response: The complete standards of this section are addressed in this narrative, including B.8. and D. 4. The minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of combinations for landscaping and screening as specified in Table 18.745.1. In addition, improvements shall meet the following specifications:... Response: No buffers are required on the site according to the buffer matrix. This standard does not apply. 5. Where screening is required the following standards shall apply in addition to those required for buffering:... Response: No screening is required on the site according to the buffer matrix. This standard does not apply. 1 6. Buffering and screening provisions shall be superseded by the vision clearance requirements as set forth in Chapter 18.795. Response: No buffering or screening is required on the site according to the buffer matrix. This standard does not apply. The standards of Chapter 18.795 are addressed in that section of this narrative. 1 7. When the use to be screened is downhill from the adjoining zone or use, the prescribed heights of required fences, walls, or landscape screening shall be measured from the actual grade of the adjoining property. In this case, fences and walls may exceed the permitted six-foot height at the discretion of the director as a condition of approval. When the grades are so steep so as to make the installation of walls, fences or H:\Projects V13004316\WP\RPTfirty of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 26 IM . _ landscaping to the required height impractical, a detailed landscape/screening plan shall be submitted for approval. Response: No buffers are required for the site or use according to the buffer matrix. This standard does not apply. 8. Fences and walls. a. Fences and walls shall be constructed of any materials commonly used in the construction of fences and walls such as wood, stone, rock or brick, or otherwise acceptable by the director; • b. Such fence or wall construction shall be in compliance with other city regulations; — Landscaping and Screening 18.745-5 AP Update:2/14 . c. Walls shall be a minimum of six inches thick; and d. Chain link fences with slats shall qualify for screening; however, chain link fences I without slats shall require the planting of a continuous evergreen hedge to be considered screening. Response: No buffers are required on the site according to the buffer matrix and no buffering or gm screening for the use will be provided by fences or walls. This standard does not apply. IScreening will be provided for the trash enclosure as required by and discussed in the responses to section 18.755 of this narrative. 1 9. Hedges. a. An evergreen hedge or other dense evergreen landscaping may satisfy a requirement for a sight-obscuring fence where required subject to the height Irequirement in subparagraphs C.2.a and C.2.b of this section; b. Such hedge or other dense landscaping shall be properly maintained and shall be replaced with another hedge, other dense evergreen landscaping, or a fence Iwhen it ceases to serve the purpose of obscuring view;and c. No hedge shall be grown or maintained at a height greater than that permitted I by these regulations for a fence or wall in a vision clearance area as set forth in Chapter 18.795. Response: No sight-obscuring fences are required on the site according to the buffer matrix. This standard does not apply. However, the L-2 screening along the west, north, and east Iproperty lines will be composed of dense evergreen plantings and will be properly maintained. C. Setbacks for fences or walls. 1. No fence or wall shall be constructed which exceeds the standards in paragraph 2 of this subsection C except when the approval authority, as a condition of approval, allows that I a fence or wall be constructed to a height greater than otherwise permitted to mitigate against potential adverse effects. Response: No permanent fences or walls are proposed as screening for the use. This standard idoes not apply. 2. Fences or walls. I a. May not exceed three feet in height in a required front yard along local streets or eight feet in all other locations and, in all other cases,shall meet vision clearance area requirements in Chapter 18.795; I b. Are permitted up to six feet in height in front yards adjacent to any designated arterial or collector street. For any fence over three feet in height in the required i H:\Projects\213004316\W P\RPT-ity of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.dooc 27 M . front yard area, permission shall be subject to administrative review of the location of the fence or wall. 3. All fences or walls shall meet vision clearance area requirements in Chapter 18.795. 4. All fences or walls greater than six feet in height shall be subject to building permit approval. Response: No permanent fences or walls are proposed as screening for the use. This standard does not apply. D. Height restrictions. 1. The prescribed heights of required fences, walls or landscaping shall be measured from the actual adjoining level of finished grade, except that where parking, loading, storage or similar areas are located above finished grade, the height of fences, walls or landscaping required to screen such areas or space shall be measured from the level of such improvements. 2. An earthen berm and fence or wall combination shall not exceed the six-foot height limitation for screening. Response: No prescribed heights of required fences, walls, or landscaping apply to the site according to this code section. This standard does not apply. Landscaping requirements of the Washington Square Regional Center Plan District, including a 3' high hedge for L-1 landscaping, are addressed in that section of this narrative. E. Screening:special provisions. 1. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas: a. Screening of parking and loading areas is required. In no cases shall nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas (i.e., nonconforming situation) be permitted to become any less conforming. Nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas shall be brought into conformance with the provisions of this chapter as part of the approval process for conditional use (Type Ill), downtown design review (Type II and Ill), planned development (Type Ill), and site development review(Type II)permits only. The specifications for this screening are as follows: i. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls and raised planters; ii. Landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-street parking areas from the public right-of-way; iii. Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; iv. All parking areas, including parking spaces and aisles, shall be required to achieve at least 30% tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the parking area in accordance with the parking lot tree canopy standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. Response: As shown in the attached landscape plans, the proposed parking lot landscaping will include Red Sunset Maple trees, evergreen Japanese Holly, and evergreen Wax Myrtle plantings to effectively screen the parking lot areas from view of the right-of-way. Plant materials will provide a balance of low-lying and vertical trees, shrubs, and groundcover. As shown in the Tree Canopy Site Plan (L2.1), 41.8% tree canopy coverage will be achieved on the site and 50.2% coverage will be achieved in the parking area.This standard is met. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT{ty of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 28 M . 2. Screening of service facilities. Except for one family and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or disposal area and service facilities such as gas meters and air conditioners which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility or any residential area shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall between five and eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area. Response:As shown on the attached plans (see sheet L2.3 and Elevations),the trash area will be screened from the adjacent property (east and north elevations) by a masonry (CMU) wall (6'2" high above finish floor). A rough sawn cedar siding wall will surround the enclosure on the south and west sides, concealing the trash area from view of customers on the adjacent plaza and parking area on the property. No other elements such as gas meters or air conditioners in view of the street or parking area exist on the site (the existing gas meter on the northeast corner of the building will remain and will be concealed from the plaza, parking area, and street by landscaping and other site elements). The standards of section 18.755 are addressed in that section of this narrative.This standard is met. 3. Screening of swimming pools. All swimming pools shall be enclosed as required by the state building code. Response: No swimming pools are proposed.This standard does not apply. 4. Screening of refuse containers. Except for one- and two-family dwellings, any refuse container or refuse collection area which would be visible from a public street, parking lot, residential or commercial area, or any public facility such as a school or park shall be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge.All refuse shall be contained within the screened area. Response:As shown on the attached plans(see sheet L2.3 and Elevations),the trash area will be screened from the adjacent property (east and north elevations) by a masonry (CMU) wall (6'2" high above finish floor). A rough sawn cedar siding wall will surround the enclosure on the south and west sides, concealing the trash area from view of customers on the adjacent plaza and parking area on the property. The standards of section 18.755 are addressed in that section of this narrative.This standard is met. F. Buffer matrix. 1. The buffer matrices contained in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2 shall be used in calculating widths of buffering/screening and required improvements to be installed between proposed uses and abutting uses or zoning districts. Response: No buffer is required according to the buffer matrix (Table 18.745.1) for the project and zone. The subject site is located in the MUC zone, surrounded on all sides by other MUC- zoned properties. No buffering is required by the matrix for the use or parking lot from other properties or streets.This standard does not apply. 2. An application for a variance to the standards required in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2, shall be processed as a Type 11 procedure, as regulated by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.010. Response: No buffering is required by the above tables and no variance is requested. This standard does not apply. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-CrtyofTigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 29 M M . 18.745.060 Re-vegetation A. When re-vegetation is required. Where natural vegetation has been removed through grading in areas not affected by the landscaping and screening requirements and that are not to be occupied by structures, such areas are to be replanted as set forth in this section to prevent erosion after construction activities are completed. Response:This application is for the renovation of an existing building and developed site; no grading is proposed.This standard does not apply. 8. Preparation for re-vegetation. Topsoil removed from the surface in preparation for grading and construction is to be stored on or near the sites and protected from erosion while grading operations are underway;and... Response:This application is for the renovation of an existing building and developed site; no grading is proposed.This standard does not apply. C. Methods of re-vegetation. Acceptable methods of re-vegetation include hydro-mulching or the planting of rye grass, barley, or other seed with equivalent germination rates, and:... — Response:This application is for the renovation of an existing building and developed site; no grading is proposed.This standard does not apply. 18.755 Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage 18.755.040 Methods of Demonstrating Compliance — A. Alternative methods of compliance. An applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: 1. Minimum standards; 2. Waste assessment; 3. Comprehensive recycling plan; or 4. Franchised hauler review and sign-off. Response:The proposed trash enclosure used for mixed solid waste and recycling storage complies with the minimum standards method, as demonstrated in this narrative (18.755.040.C.5.). 8. Provisions. The following provisions apply to all four methods of demonstrating compliance: 1. Section 18.755.050, Location, Design and Access Standards, except as provided in 18.755.040.G; 2. The floor area of an interior or exterior storage area required by this chapter shall be excluded from the calculation of lot coverage and from the calculation of building floor area for purposes of determining minimum storage requirements. Response:The standards of 18.755.050 are met and addressed in that section of this narrative.The floor area of the trash enclosure is not included in the building floor area for the purposes of calculating minimum storage requirements, as shown below(response to 18.755.040.C.5.).This standard is met. C. Minimum standards method. 1. Description of method. This method specifies a minimum storage area requirement based on the size and general use category of the new construction; 2. Typical application of method. This method is most appropriate when the specific use of a new building is not known. It provides specific dimensions for the minimum size of storage areas by general use category; 3. Application requirements and review procedure. The size and location of the storage area(s) shall be indicated on the site plan of any construction subject to this ordinance. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT{iry of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.door 30 M M . Through the site plan review process, compliance with the general and specific requirements set forth below is verified; Response: This application complies with the minimum standards method, as demonstrated in this narrative (18.755.040.C.5.).This standard is met. 4. General requirements. a. The storage area requirement is based on the predominant use(s) of the building, (i.e., residential, office, retail, wholesale/warehouse/ manufacturing, educational/institutional, or other). If a building has more than one of the uses listed herein and that use occupies 20% or less of the floor area of the building, the floor area occupied by that use shall be counted toward the floor area of the predominant use(s). If a building has more than one of the uses listed herein and that use occupies more than 20% of the floor area of the building, then the storage area requirement for the whole building shall be the sum of the requirement for the area of each use. b. Storage areas for multiple uses on a single site may be combined and shared. c. The specific requirements are based on an assumed storage height of four feet for solid waste/recyclable. Vertical storage higher than four feet but no higher than seven feet may be used to accommodate the same volume of storage in a reduced floor space (potential reduction of 43%of specific requirements). Where vertical or stacked storage is proposed, the site plan shall include drawings to illustrate the layout of the storage area and dimensions of containers. Response: The building will have only one use, retail (eating and drinking establishments: fast food). This will be the only use on the site. No vertical or stacked storage is proposed. This standard is met. 5. Specific requirements. a. Multi-unit residential buildings containing 5-10 units shall provide a minimum storage area of 50 square feet. Buildings containing more than 10 residential units shall provide an additional five square feet per unit for each unit above 10. b. Nonresidential buildings shall provide a minimum storage area of 10 square feet, plus: ii. Retail: 10 square feet/1,000 square feet GFA. Response: The proposed building area on the site will be 2,056 SF of retail use. Thus, the following calculation applies: 2,056 SF/ 1,000= 2.056 SF 2.056 SF * 10= 20.56 SF 20.56 SF+ 10= 30.56 SF TOTAL STORAGE AREA REQUIRED:30.56 SF As shown on the attached plans, a 20'x10' trash enclosure is proposed, providing 200 SF of mixed solid waste/recycling storage area.This standard is met. D. Waste assessment method... Response: This application complies with the minimum standards method, as demonstrated in this narrative (18.755.040.C.5.). The waste assessment method is not proposed. This standard does not apply. E. Comprehensive recycling plan method... Response: This application complies with the minimum standards method, as demonstrated in this narrative (18.755.040.C.5.). The comprehensive recycling plan method is not proposed. This standard does not apply. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT{Ry of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.door 31 M M . F. Franchised hauler review method... Response: This application complies with the minimum standards method, as demonstrated in this narrative (18.755.040.C.5.). The franchised hauler review method is not proposed. This standard does not apply. 18.755.050 Location, Design and Access Standards for Storage Areas A. Applicable standards. The following location, design and access standards for storage areas are applicable to all four methods of compliance, described in Section 18.755.040. Response: This application complies with the minimum standards method, as demonstrated in this narrative (18.755.040.C.5.). The location, design, and access standards of the proposed trash enclosure also complies with this section. 8. Location standards. 1. To encourage its use, the storage area for source-separated recyclable shall be co- located with the storage area for residual mixed solid waste. Response: As shown on the attached plans, the proposed trash enclosure will be 10'x20' (200 SF), providing ample room for all source-separated recyclable storage, as well as mixed solid waste storage in standard containers provided by Pride Disposal.This standard is met. 2. Indoor and outdoor storage areas shall comply with uniform building and fire code requirements. Response: No indoor storage areas are proposed. The outdoor trash enclosure area will comply with uniform building and fire code requirements and will be permitted through the City of Tigard.This standard is met. 3. Storage area space requirements can be satisfied with a single location or multiple locations, and can combine both interior and exterior locations. Response: As shown on the attached plans, one exterior trash enclosure is proposed; this enclosure provides more than the required space for storage.This standard is met. 4. Exterior storage areas can be located within interior side yard or rear yard areas. Exterior storage areas shall not be located within a required front yard setback or in a 1 yard adjacent to a public or private street. Response: Due to site configuration limitations, an alternative shape trash enclosure is proposed to meet the intent of this standard. The proposed location and configuration of the trash enclosure area, as shown on the attached plans, has been approved by both Pride Disposal and the City of Tigard.This standard does not apply. 1 5. Exterior storage areas shall be located in central and visible locations on a site to enhance security for users. Response: As shown on the attached plans, the exterior trash enclosure will be located in a convenient, visible location near the building to enhance security and ease of use.This standard is met. 6. Exterior storage areas can be located in a parking area, if the proposed use provides at least the minimum number of parking spaces required for the use after deducting the area used for storage. Storage areas shall be appropriately screened according to the provisions in subsection C, design standards. Response: As shown on the attached plans, the exterior trash enclosure is not proposed within the parking area.This standard does not apply. H:\Projeds\213034316\WP\RPT-Crty of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doo 32 M M . 7. The storage area shall be accessible for collection vehicles and located so that the storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic movement on the site or on public streets adjacent to the site. Response: As shown on the attached plans, the exterior trash enclosure will be located in an area accessible by the hauler during off-hours (approved according to recent discussions with Pride Disposal and the City of Tigard). The storage area will not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle movement on the site or adjacent street.This standard is met. C. Design standards. 1. The dimensions of the storage area shall accommodate containers consistent with current methods of local collection. Response: As shown on the attached plans, the proposed trash enclosure will be 10'x20' (200 SF), providing ample room for all source-separated recyclable storage as well as mixed solid waste storage in standard containers provided by Pride Disposal.This standard is met. 2. Storage containers shall meet uniform fire code standards and be made and covered with waterproof materials or situated in a covered area. Response: The storage containers used will be standard containers provided by Pride Disposal, and will be covered and made of waterproof materials.This standard is met. 3. Exterior storage areas shall be enclosed by a sight-obscuring fence wall, or hedge at least six feet in height. Gate openings which allow access to users and haulers shall be provided. Gate openings for haulers shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and shall be capable of being secured in a closed and open position. Response: As shown on the attached plans (see Elevations), the trash enclosure will be made of a masonry (CMU) wall (6'2" high above finish floor) on the north and east sides and a rough sawn cedar siding wall on the south and west sides, concealing the trash area from view of customers on the adjacent plaza and parking area on the property. The gate opening will be 10' wide to allow for hauler access and will include opaque metal gates for security.This standard is met. 4. Storage area(s) and containers shall be clearly labeled to indicate the type of materials accepted. • Response: The storage containers used will be standard containers provided by Pride Disposal, and will be labeled with standard labels.This standard is met. D. Access standards. 1. Access to storage areas can be limited for security reasons; however, the storage area shall be accessible to users at convenient times of the day, and to collection service personnel on the day and approximate time they are scheduled to provide collection service. Response: As shown on the attached plans, the proposed trash enclosure will be conveniently located and will be accessible to users at convenient times of the day. The exterior trash enclosure will be located in an area accessible by the hauler during off-hours (approved per recent discussions with Pride Disposal and the City of Tigard).This standard is met. 2. Storage areas shall be designed to be easily accessible to collection trucks and equipment, considering paving, grade and vehicle access. A minimum of 10 feet horizontal clearance and eight feet of vertical clearance is required if the storage area is covered. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-cityofTigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.dooc 33 M M . Response:The proposed storage area will not be covered.This standard does not apply. 3. Storage areas shall be accessible to collection vehicles without requiring backing out of a driveway onto a public street. If only a single access point is available to the storage area, adequate turning radius shall be provided to allow collection vehicles to safety exit the site in a forward motion. Response: The provide trash enclosure will be accessible to collection vehicles by the proposed standard City of Tigard commercial driveway (30') and 67.8' deep parking area, and will not require backing into a public street. An adequate turning radius will be provided by the parking area. The exterior trash storage area will be located in an area accessible by the hauler during off-hours (approved according to recent discussions with Pride Disposal and the City of Tigard). This standard is met. 18.765 Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements 18.765.030 General Provisions A. Vehicle parking plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Response:The attached plans are scaled and show access, egress, and circulation.The site plan on sheet C2.1 best shows how the project complies with the requirements. B. Location of vehicle parking. The location of off-street parking will be as follows: 1. Off-street parking spaces for single-family and duplex dwellings and single-family attached dwellings shall be located on the same lot with the dwelling(s). Response: This proposal is for a commercial project; no residential uses are included. This standard does not apply. 1 2. Off-street parking lots for uses not listed above shall be located not further than 500 feet from the property line that they are required to serve, measured along the most direct, publicly accessible pedestrian route from the property line with the following exceptions:... Response: As shown in the attached plans, the parking lot on the site is located on the site. No exceptions to this standard are proposed.This standard does not apply. C. Joint parking. Owners of two or more uses, structures or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same parking and loading spaces when the peak hours of operation do not overlay, ' subject to the following:... Response: The parking lot on the subject site will serve only the existing building; no joint parking or loading is proposed.This standard does not apply. D. Parking in mixed-use and multiple-tenant projects. In commercial mixed-use and multiple-tenant projects, the required minimum vehicle parking shall be determined using the following formula:... Response:This proposal is for a commercial project; no residential uses are included.This standard does not apply. I 111 H:\Projects\273004316\W%RPT-Crtyof Tigard-Type II site Development Review-140602 REV 2.docx 34 M M . E. Visitor parking in multifamily residential developments... Response:This proposal is for a commercial project; no residential uses are included.This standard does not apply. F. Preferential long-term carpool/vanpool parking. Parking lots providing in excess of 20 long-term parking spaces shall provide preferential long-term carpool and vanpool parking for employees, _ students and other regular visitors to the site. At least five percent of total long-term parking spaces shall be reserved for carpool/vanpool use. Preferential parking for carpools/vanpools shall be closer to the main entrances of the building than any other employee or student parking except parking spaces designated for use by the disabled. Preferential carpool/vanpool spaces shall be full-sized per requirements in 18.765.040.N and shall be clearly designated for use only by carpools and vanpools between 7 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Response:The proposed project requires only 14.392 parking spaces.This standard does not apply. G. Disabled-accessible parking. All parking areas shall be provided with the required number of 1 parking spaces for disabled persons as specified by the state building code and federal standards. Such parking spaces shall be sized, signed and marked as required by these regulations. IResponse:As shown on the attached plans(see C2.1), ADA parking will be provided as required by code, width one accessible stall marked with sign adjacent to one loading zone.This standard is met. H. DEQ indirect source construction permit. All parking lots containing 250 spaces or parking structures containing two or more levels shall require review by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) to:... Response:The proposed project requires only 14.392 parking spaces.This standard does not apply. 18.765.040 General Design Standards A. Maintenance of parking areas. All parking lots shall be kept clean and in good repair at all times. Breaks in paved surfaces shall be repaired promptly and broken or splintered wheel stops shall be replaced so that their function will not be impaired. Response: Maintenance of the parking lot on the site will be the responsibility of the owner and it will be kept in good repair.This standard is met. B. Access drives. With regard to access to public streets from off-street parking: 1. Access drives from the street to off-street parking or loading areas shall be designed and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic and provide maximum safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the site; Response: No changes to the existing access drive location are proposed. The parking lot will use the existing access from SW Shady Lane, which will be expanded to meet current City of Tigard commercial driveway standards.This standard is met. 2. The number and size of access drives shall be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.705,Access, Egress and Circulation; Response: No changes to the existing access drive location are proposed. The parking lot will use the existing access from SW Shady Lane, which will be expanded to meet current City of Tigard commercial driveway standards.This standard is met. 3. Access drives shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined through use of rails, fences, walls or other barriers or markers on frontage not occupied by service drives; H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-CRy of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.dom 35 M M . Response: No changes to the existing access drive location are proposed. The parking lot will use the existing access from SW Shady Lane, which will be expanded to meet current City of Tigard commercial driveway standards, and will be clearly and permanently defined with curbing.This standard is met. 4. Access drives shall have a minimum vision clearance in accordance with Chapter 18.795, Visual Clearance; Response: The standards of Chapter 18.975 are addressed in that section of this narrative. This standard is met. 5. Access drives shall be improved with an asphalt, concrete, or pervious paving surface. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained; and Response: As shown on the attached plans, the driveway will be constructed of asphalt (and concrete at the sidewalk) and will drain to catch basins at the southeast and southwest corners of the site (these will be replaced with new catch basins in the same locations). This standard is met. 6. Excluding single-family and duplex residences, except as provided by 18.810.030.P, groups of two or more parking spaces shall be served by a service drive so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way wwill be required. Response: As shown on the attached plans, all parking spaces will be served by drive areas; no backing or maneuvering within the street or right-of-way will be required.This standard is met. C. Loading/unloading driveways. A driveway designed for continuous forward flow of passenger vehicles for the purpose of loading and unloading passengers shall be located on the site of any ' school or other meeting place which is designed to accommodate more than 25 people at one time. Response:This proposal is for a commercial project; no school or other meeting places are proposed nor require loading/unloading passenger areas.This standard does not apply. D. On-site vehicle stacking for drive-in use. 1 1. All uses providing drive-in services as defined by this title shall provide on the same site a stacking lane for inbound vehicles as noted in Table 18.765.1. ' TABLE 18.765.1 STACKING LANE REQUIREMENTS FOR USES WITH DRIVE-IN WINDOWS Use Reservoir Requirement Drive-in banks 150 feet/service terminal Automated teller 50 feet/service terminal machines Drive-up telephones 50 feet Drive-in cleaners, repair services 50 feet Drive-in restaurants 200 feet Drive-in theaters 200 feet Gasoline service 75 feet between curb cut and nearest pump Mechanical car washes 75 feet/washing unit Parking facilities: -Free flow entry 25 feet/entry driveway 111 -Ticket dispense entry 50 feet/entry driveway -Manual ticket dispensing 100 feet/entry driveway -Attendant parking 100 feet H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-Qty of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 36 M M . Response:The proposed project includes a drive-through lane for a coffee shop (restaurant,fast food) with drive-in window. As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), a 200' stacking lane is proposed.This standard is met. 2. The director may reduce the length of the inbound stacking lane by means of an adjustment to be reviewed through a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria contained in 18.370.020.C.7.g. Response: As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), a 200' stacking lane is proposed. No adjustment to the stacking lane length requirement is proposed.This standard does not apply. 3. Stacking lanes must be designed so that they do not interfere with parking and vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle circulation. Stacking lanes for the purpose of selling food must provide at least one clearly marked parking space per service window for the use of vehicles waiting for an order to be filled. Response: As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), the stacking lane is designed so as not to interfere with circulation and will be physically separated from the parking area by landscaped area. The proposed use is a coffee shop that will serve a limited menu of pre-made food, and MEM the stacking lane will not serve "the purpose of selling food"; vehicles will not require a waiting area for food orders to be filled.This standard is met. E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with 18.810.030.N. Response: The standards of section 18.810.030.N are addressed in that section of this narrative. This standard is met. F. Pedestrian access. Pedestrian access through parking lots shall be provided in accordance with 18.705.030.F. Where a parking area or other vehicle area has a drop-off grade separation, the property owner shall install a wall, railing, or other barrier which will prevent a slow-moving 1 vehicle or driverless vehicle from escaping such area and which will prevent pedestrians from walking over drop-off edges. Response: As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), pedestrian access will be provided on the site via a 6' wide contrasting pavement walkway. The standards of section 18.705.030.F are addressed in that section of this narrative. The parking area does not have a drop-off grade separation. This standard is met. G. Parking lot landscaping. Parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.745. Response: The standards of Chapter 18.745 are addressed in that section of this narrative, and parking lot landscaping will be provided in accordance with the standards.This standard is met. H. Parking space surfacing. 1. Except for single-family and duplex residences, and for temporary uses or fleet storage areas as authorized in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this subsection H, all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, boat or trailer shall be improved with asphalt, concrete, or pervious paving surfaces. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. 111 Response: As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), the parking area will be paved with asphalt and concrete (at walkways).This standard is met. I H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT Gry of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 37 M M . 2. Off-street parking spaces for single and two-family residences shall be improved with an asphalt, concrete, or pervious paving surface. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Response: This proposal is for a commercial project; no residential uses are included. This standard does not apply. 3. Parking areas to be used primarily for the storage of fleet vehicles or construction equipment may be surfaced in gravel when authorized by the approval authority at the time the site development approval is given. The director may require that the property owner enter into an agreement to pave the parking area: (a) within a specified period of time after establishment of the parking area; or (b) if there is a change in the types or weights of vehicles utilizing the parking area; or(c) if there is evidence of adverse effects upon adjacent roadways, water courses, or properties. Such an agreement shall be executed as a condition of approval of the plan to establish the gravel parking area. Gravel-surfaced parking areas may only be permitted consistent with the following:... Response: This proposal is for a drive-through coffee shop project; no fleet vehicle or construction equipment storage or gravel parking is proposed.This standard does not apply. 4. Parking areas to be used in conjunction with a temporary use may be surfaced in gravel when authorized by the approval authority at the time the permit is approved. The approval authority shall consider the following in determining whether or not the gravel- surfaced parking is warranted:... Response: This proposal is for a drive-through coffee shop project; no temporary uses or gravel parking is proposed.This standard does not apply. 1. Parking lot striping. 1. Except for single-family and duplex residences, any area intended to be used to meet the off-street parking requirements as contained in this chapter shall have all parking spaces clearly marked; and 2. All interior drives and access aisles shall be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow and maintain vehicular and pedestrian safety. Response: As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), the parking area will be striped and parking spaces will be clearly indicated. Circulation patterns on the site will be made clear through site elements 111 and arrows indicating direction on the drive-through lane.This standard is met. J. Wheel stops. Parking spaces along the boundaries of a parking lot or adjacent to interior landscaped areas or sidewalks shall be provided with a wheel stop at least four inches high located three feet back from the front of the parking stall. The front three feet of the parking stall may be concrete, asphalt or low lying landscape material that does not exceed the height of the wheel stop. This area cannot be calculated to meet landscaping or sidewalk requirements. Response: As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), a 3' bumper overhang will be provided on all stalls. This will be provided through a 3' landscaped area on the 7 stalls on the west side of the site; through bumper overhangs 3' from the edge of the stripe and curb on the 2 stalls on the southern side facing SW Shady Lane and on the southern 4 stalls on the east property line facing east; and through additional stall area on the northern 3 stalls on the east property line. These 3 stalls cannot contain curbs 3' feet from the stripe and edge of curb because of access needs for the trash enclosure north of the parking area.This standard is met. K. Drainage. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be drained in accordance with specifications approved by the city engineer to ensure that ponds do not occur except for single-family and H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPTfiiry of Tigard-Type ll Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.loot 38 M ■ duplex residences, off-street parking and loading facilities shall be drained to avoid flow of water across public sidewalks. Response: The parking area drains to the existing catch basins in the southeast and southwest corners of the site. These catch basins will be replaced with Contech storm filter catch basins. This standard is met. L. Lighting. A lights providing to illuminate any public or private parking area or vehicle sales area shall be arranged to direct the light away from any adjacent residential district. Response:The subject site is not adjacent to any residential district.This standard does not apply. M. Signs. Signs which are placed on parking lots shall be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 18.780,Signs. Response: The signs proposed in the parking area comply with the standards of section 18.630.070, addressed in that section of this narrative (as instructed by Chapter 18.780 in reference to the Washington Square Regional Center Plan District).This standard is met. N. Space and aisle dimensions. (Figure 18.765.1) FIGURE 18.765.1 OFF-STREET SURFACE PARKING MATRIX Required Space and Aisle Dimensions in Feet COMPACT STANDARD A B C D E F G B C D E F G 450 7.50 15.5 13.0 10.61 44.0 2.0 8.5 17.5 13.0 12.0 48.0 2.0 ' 7.75 15.5 12.0 10.96 43.0 2.0 9.0 17.5 12.0 12.7 47.2 2.0 7.75 15.5 11.0 10.96 42.0 2.0 9.5 17.5 11.0 13.4 46.0 2.0 8.00 15.5 11.0 11.32 42.0 2.0 10.0 17.5 11.0 14.1 46.0 2.0 ' 60° 7.50 17.0 18.0 8.62 48.0 2.5 8.5 19.0 18.0 9.80 56.0 2.5 7.75 17.0 16.0 9.01 46.0 2.5 9.0 19.0 16.0 10.4 54.0 2.5 7.75 17.0 15.0 9.01 54.0 2.5 9.5 19.0 15.0 11.0 53.0 2.5 8.00 17.0 14.0 9.20 44.0 2.5 10.0 19.0 14.0 11.6 52.0 2.5 750 7.50 17.5 25.5 7.73 60.5 2.5 8.5 19.5 25.5 8.80 64.0 2.5 7.75 17.5 23.0 7.99 58.0 2.5 9.0 19.5 23.0 9.30 62.0 2.5 7.75 17.5 22.0 7.99 57.0 2.5 9.5 19.5 22.0 9.80 61.0 2.5 8.00 17.5 21.0 8.25 56.0 2.5 10.0 19.5 21.0 10.3 60.0 2.5 90° 7.50 16.5 28.0 7.50 61.0 3.0 8.5 18.5 28.0 8.50 65.0 3.0 7.75 16.5 26.0 7.75 60.0 3.0 9.0 18.5 26.0 9.00 63.0 3.0 7.75 16.5 25.0 7.75 59.0 3.0 9.5 18.5 25.0 9.50 62.0 3.0 8.00 16.5 24.0 8.00 58.0 3.0 10.0 18.5 24.0 10.0 61.0 3.0 r I H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-ity of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.dooc 39 M M . Stall width dimensions may be distributed as follows: 50%standard spaces,50% compact spaces.All compact spaces shall be labeled as such. A A Parking Angle B Stall Width E-t C Stall Depth(no bumper overhang) F p D Aisle Width Between Stall Lines(5) .j. E Stall Width Parallel to Aisle F Module Width(no bumper overhang) G Bumper Overhang 1. Except as modified for angled parking in Figures 18.765.1 and 18.765.2, the minimum dimensions for parking spaces are: a. 8.5'x 18.5'for a standard space; b. 7.5'x 16.5'for a compact space; and c. As required by applicable State of Oregon and federal standards for designated disabled person parking spaces; d. The width of each parking space includes a stripe which separates each space. Response: As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), the proposed parking stalls will be full- size (18.5' to front of curb), full-size including 6" bumper overhang (18' stripes on east property line plus curb overhang), full-size including 1.5' landscaped bumper overhang (17' stripe facing drive-through on west side of parking area), and full-size including 3' pavement provided within the 18.5' deep stalls on the north-south direction parking stalls. The stalls will be at least 8.5' wide.This standard is met. 2. Aisles accommodating two direction traffic, or allowing access from both ends, shall be 24 feet in width; Response: As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), two-way aisles on the site will be 26' to 30'wide.This standard is met. 3. Minimum standards for a standard parking stall's length and width, aisle width, and maneuvering space shall be determined as noted in Figure 18.765.2. Response:The standards of Figure 18.765.2 are addressed above.This standard is met. 18.765.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards A. Location and access. With regard to the location and access to bicycle parking: 1 1. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; Response: As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), a bicycle parking area will be provided ' directly adjacent to the main entrance doors, at the southeast corner of the building on the pedestrian plaza.This standard is met. 2. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; Response: As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), a bicycle parking area will be provided directly adjacent to the main entrance doors, at the southeast corner of the building on the H:\Projects\2130 4316\WP\RPT-Oty of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.dooc 40 M ■ pedestrian plaza (not within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways). This standard is met. 3. Outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; Response: As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), the outdoor bicycle parking area will be visible from the building and the street.This standard is met. 4. Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Response:The required bicycle parking will be provided outside.This standard does not apply. Mink B. Covered parking spaces. 1. When possible, bicycle parking facilities should be provided under cover. Response: The bicycle parking area will be located at the southeast corner of the building, adjacent to the existing fascia.Additional cover is not feasible. 2. Required bicycle parking for uses served by a parking structure must provide for covered bicycle parking unless the structure will be more than 100 feet from the primary entrance to the building, in which case, the uncovered bicycle parking may be provided closer to the building entrance. Response: As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), the outdoor bicycle parking area will be located less than 30' from the main entrance doors.This standard is met. C. Design requirements. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: 1. The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee)parking is encouraged but not required; Response: The required bicycle parking spaces will be provided on standard racks which will allow for secure locking.This standard is met. 2. Bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; Response: The required bicycle parking spaces will be provided on standard racks which will be securely mounted to the pavers on the plaza.This standard is met. 3. Bicycle parking spaces shall be at least two and one-half feet by six feet long, and, when ' covered, with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; Response: As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), the bicycle parking spaces will be 2.5'x6'. They will have no vertical clearance limitations, and can be accessed from the plaza with 42' of clear area in front and 12'of clearance to the south.This standard is met. 4. Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; Response: As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), the bicycle parking spaces will be 2.5'x6'. This standard is met. I HAProjects\21.3004316\WP\RPT-city of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 41 M . 5. Required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; Response: This project proposes renovation of the existing site for only one user, a drive- through coffee shop. The required bicycle parking will not be available for rental or lease. This standard does not apply. 6. Areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Response: As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), the bicycle parking area will be clearly designated with bicycle racks and located at the northeast corner of the pedestrian plaza; it will not be confused with parking areas for other vehicles.This standard is met. D. Paving. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete, other pervious paving surfaces, or similar material. This surface must • be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Response: As shown on the attached plans (see C2.1), the bicycle parking area will be located at the northeast corner of the pedestrian plaza on hard-surfaced materials.This standard is met. E. Minimum bicycle parking requirements. The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two ' bicycle parking spaces. Single-family residences and duplexes are excluded from the bicycle parking requirements. The director may reduce the number of required bicycle parking spaces by means of an adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in 18.370.020.C.5.e. Response: According to Table 18.765.2, for fast food eating and drinking establishments, 1.0 bicycle parking spaces are required per 1,000 SF.Thus,the following calculation applies: 2,056 SF/ 1,000= 2.056 SF 2.056 SF * 1.0= 2.056 spaces TOTAL BICYCLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 2 spaces As shown on the attached plans,two bicycle parking spaces will be provided.This standard is met. 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements A. Parking requirements for unlisted uses.... Response: The use of the subject site is listed Eating and Drinking Establishments > Fast Food use, as defined by Chapter 18.765: "Fast food designation includes all eating and drinking establishments with a 'walk-up counter' or less than 10 tables in the dining area."This standard does not apply. B. Choice of parking requirements. When a building or use is planned or constructed in such a manner that a choice of parking requirements could be made, the use which requires the greater number of parking spaces shall govern. Response:The subject site is somewhat constrained by its existing building and parking area layout, and the maximum number of parking spaces was provided while allowing for compliance with other site layout standards.This standard is met. rC. Measurements. The following measurements shall be used in calculating the total minimum number of vehicle parking spaces required in subsection H of this section: 1 1. Fractions. Fractional space requirements shall be counted as a whole space. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT{rty oft Bard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 42 IM ■ 2. Employees. Where employees are specified for the purpose of determining the minimum vehicle parking spaces required, the employees counted are those who work on the premises during the largest shift at the peak season. 3. Students. When students are specified for the purpose of determining the minimum vehicle parking spaces required, the students counted are those who are on the campus during the peak period of the day during a typical school term. 4. Space. Unless otherwise specified, where square feet are specified, the area measured shall be gross floor area under the roof measured from the faces of the structure, excluding only space devoted to covered off-street parking or loading. Response: Space (square feet) is used to calculate the required number of parking spaces, and uses the gross floor area of 2,056 SF, which includes the existing building square footage of 2,015 SF, plus the proposed addition of 41 SF.This standard is met. D. Exclusions to minimum vehicle parking requirements. The following shall not be counted towards the computation of the minimum parking spaces as required in subsection H of this section: 1. On-street parking. Parking spaces in the public street or alley shall not be eligible as fulfilling any part of the parking requirement except;religious institutions may count on- street parking around the perimeter of the use provided that the following criteria have been satisfied:... ' Response:All required parking will be provided on-site.This standard does not apply. 2. Fleet parking. Required vehicle parking spaces may not be used for storage of fleet vehicles, except when a use can show that employee and fleet parking spaces are used interchangeably; e.g., the employee drives the fleet vehicle from home, or the spaces are used for fleet storage only at night and are available for employee use during the day. For the purposes of this title, space exclusively devoted to the storage of fleet vehicles will be considered as outdoor storage. Response:This proposal is for a drive-through coffee shop project; no fleet parking is proposed. ' This standard does not apply. E. Exceptions to maximum parking standards. When calculating the maximum vehicle parking allowed as regulated by Section 18.765.080.H, the following exception shall apply:... Response: No exceptions to the maximum parking standards are proposed.This section does not apply. F. Reductions in minimum required vehicle parking. Reductions in the required number of vehicle parking spaces may be permitted as follows:... Response: No exceptions to the minimum parking standards are proposed.This section does not apply. G. Increases in maximum required vehicle parking. The director may increase the total maximum number of vehicle spaces allowed in subsection H of this section by means of a parking adjustment to be reviewed by means of a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, ' using approval criteria contained in 18.370.020.C.5.d. Response: No exceptions to the minimum or maximum parking standards are proposed. This section does not apply. HAProjects\213004316\WP RFT{fty of Tigard-Type ll Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 43 M M . H. Specific requirements.See Table 18.765.2. Response: According to Table 18.765.2, for fast food eating and drinking establishments, 7.0 parking spaces are required per 1,000 SF.Thus,the following calculation applies: 2,056 SF/1,000=2.056 SF 2.056 SF * 7.0= 14.392 spaces TOTAL BICYCLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 14.392 spaces As shown on the attached plans, 16 parking spaces will be provided.This standard is met. 1. Developments in the MU-CBD zone. Please see Section 18.610.060, off-street vehicle parking minimum requirements in the MU-CBD zone. Response:The site is not located in the MU-CBD zone.This standard does not apply. 18.765.080 Off-Street Loading Requirements A. Off-street loading spaces. Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: 1. A minimum of one loading space is required for buildings with 10,000 gross square feet or more; 2. A minimum of two loading spaces for buildings with 40,000 gross square feet or more. Response:This proposal is for renovation of an existing building; existing and proposed size are less than 10,000 SF. No loading space is required.This standard does not apply. B. Off-street loading dimensions.... Response:This proposal is for renovation of an existing building; existing and proposed size are less than 10,000 SF. No loading space is required.This standard does not apply. 1 18.780 Signs 18.780.130 Zoning District Regulations ' Response: The site is located in the MUC zone; as such, the sign standards of section 18.630.070 apply and are addressed in that section of this narrative.This standard is met. ' 18.790 Urban Forestry Plan 18.790.030 Urban Forestry Plan Requirements ' A. Urban forestry plan requirements.An urban forestry plan shall: 1. Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor (the project arborist), except for minor land partitions that can demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; 2. Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; 3. Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in the Urban Forestry Manual; and 4. Meet the supplemental report standards in the Urban Forestry Manual. Response: In accordance with the Urban Forestry Manual, the attached Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan (our L2.0), the Tree Canopy Site Plan (our L2.1), and a supplemental report, included as part of those sheets, represent the urban forestry plan for this project.This standard is met. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-Oty of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 44 M M . _ B. Tree canopy fee. If the supplemental report demonstrates that the applicable standard percent effective tree canopy cover will not be provided through any combination of tree planting or preservation for the overall development site (excluding streets)...then the applicant shall provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in the tree canopy fee calculation requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual. Response:As shown in the attached Parking Lot and Street Tree Canopy and Soil Volume Plan (L2.2),the tree canopy will conform to the standards of the Urban Forestry Manual and will provide 41.8% overall coverage, exceeding the 30% requirement.This standard does not apply. C. Tree canopy fee use. Tree canopy fees provided to the city shall be deposited into the urban forestry fund and used as approved by council through a resolution. Response: The tree canopy will conform to the standards of the Urban Forestry Manual. This standard does not apply. 18.790.040 Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review Option A. General provisions. In lieu of providing payment of a tree canopy fee when less than the standard effective tree canopy cover will be provided, an applicant may apply for a discretionary urban forestry plan review. The discretionary urban forestry plan review cannot be used to modify an already approved urban forestry plan, any tree preservation or tree planting requirements established as part of another land use review approval, or any tree preservation or tree planting requirements required by another chapter in this title. Response: The tree canopy will conform to the standards of the Urban Forestry Manual and no Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review is requested.This section does not apply. 18.790.050 Flexible Standards for Tree Planting and Preservation A. General provisions. To assist in the preservation and/or planting of trees and significant tree groves, the director may apply one or more of the following flexible standards as part of the land use review approval. To the extent that the standards in this section conflict with the standards in other sections of this title, the standards in this section shall apply except in cases where the director determines there would be an unreasonable risk to public health, safety, or welfare. Use of the flexible standards shall be requested by the project arborist or landscape architect as part of the land use review process. The flexible standards are only applicable to trees that are eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. Response:The landscaping on the site will comply with all standards, as addressed in this narrative, and implementation of flexible standards is not requested.This section does not apply. ' 18.790.060 Urban Forestry Plan Implementation A. General provisions. An urban forestry plan shall be in effect from the point of land use approval ' until the director determines all applicable urban forestry plan conditions of approval and code effect for each resulting lot or tract separately until the director determines all applicable urban forestry plan conditions of approval and code requirements have been met. Prior and subsequent ' permitting decisions regarding the planting, maintenance, removal and replacement of trees when not associated with one of the land use review types in 18.790.020.A shall be administered through Title 8(Urban Forestry)of the Tigard Municipal Code. Response: The urban forestry plan included in the attached plans will be in effect until all applicable urban forestry plan conditions of approval and code requirements have been met.This standard is met. ' B. Inspections. Implementation of the urban forestry plan shall be inspected, documented and reported by the project arborist or landscape architect whenever an urban forestry plan is in H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-City of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doo 45 M ■ effect. In addition, no person may refuse entry or access to the director for the purpose of monitoring the urban forestry plan on any site with an effective urban forestry plan. The inspection requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual shall apply to sites with an effective urban forestry plan. Response: Implementation of the urban forestry plan shall be conducted by the certified landscape architect on this project.This standard is met. C. Tree establishment. The establishment of all trees shown to be planted in the tree canopy site plan (per 18.790.030.A.3) and supplemental report (per 18.790.030.A.4) of a previously approved urban forestry plan shall be guaranteed and required according to the tree establishment requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual. Response: There is no previously approved urban forestry plan for this site. This standard does not apply. D. Urban forest inventory. Spatial and species specific data shall be collected according to the urban forestry inventory requirements in the Urban Forestry Manual for each open grown tree and area of stand grown trees in the tree canopy site plan (per 18.790.030.A.3) and supplemental report(per 18.790.030.A.4)of a previously approved urban forestry plan. Response: There is no previously approved urban forestry plan for this site. This standard does not apply. 18.795 Visual Clearance Areas 18.795.030 Visual Clearance Requirements A. At corners. Except within the CBD zoning district a visual clearance area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to the intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. p Response:As shown on the attached plans (see L2.3),clear vision areas will be maintained on both sides of the driveway entrance off SW Shady Lane.This standard is met. B. Obstructions prohibited. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting,fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists,from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. Response:As shown on the attached plans (see L2.3), clear vision areas will be maintained on both sides of the driveway entrance off SW Shady Lane. The landscape area will be covered in groundcover, Japanese Holly shrubs of not more than 3', and ash and sunset maple trees with high branches, much higher than 8'.This standard is met. C. Additional topographical constraints. Where the crest of a hill or vertical curve conditions contribute to the obstruction of clear vision areas at a street or driveway intersection, hedges, plantings, fences, walls, wall structures and temporary or permanent obstructions shall be further reduced in height or eliminated to comply with the intent of the required clear vision area. Response: No topographical constraints obstruct vision areas at the driveway intersection.This standard does not apply. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-CM1y of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 46 M M . 18.795.040 Computations A. Arterial streets. On all designated arterial streets the visual clearance area shall not be less than 35 feet on each side of the intersection. Response:The site is not located on an arterial street.This standard does not apply. B. Non-arterial streets. 1. Non-arterial streets 24 feet or more in width. At all intersections of two non-arterial streets, a non-arterial street and a driveway, and a non-arterial street or driveway and railroad where at least one of the streets or driveways is 24 feet or more in width, a visual clearance area shall be a triangle formed by the right-of-way or property lines along such lots and a straight line joining the right-of-way or property line at points which are 30 feet distance from the intersection of the right-of-way line and measured along such lines. Response: The site is located on a neighborhood street of more than 24' in width. As such, as shown in the attached plans, the clear vision triangle areas are created by the lot line and line 30'from the driveway on the west side of it and 23.7'from the driveway on the east side (to the east property line). The landscaping in this area will be groundcover, Japanese Holly shrubs of not more than 3', and ash and sunset maple trees with high branches, much higher than 8'.This standard is met. 2. Non-arterial streets less than 24 feet in width. At all intersections of two non-arterial streets, a non-arterial street and a driveway, and a non-arterial street or driveway and railroad where both streets and/or driveways are less than 24 feet in width, a visual clearance area shall be a triangle whose base extends 30 feet along the street right-of- way line in both directions from the centerline of the accessway at the front setback line of a single-family and two-family residence, and 30 feet back from the property line on all other types of uses. Response:The site is not located on a non-arterial street of less than 24' in width. This standard does not apply. 18.810 Street and Utility Improvement Standards 18.810.030 Streets A. Improvements. 1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street. Response: The site for the proposed project is currently developed and has frontage and ' approved access on SW Shady Lane.This standard is met. 2. No development shall occur unless streets within the development meet the standards of ' this chapter. Response: The site for the proposed project is located on the previously developed SW Shady Lane.This standard is met. ' 3. No development shall occur unless the streets adjacent to the development meet the standards of this chapter, provided, however, that a development may be approved if the adjacent street does not meet the standards but half-street improvements meeting the standards of this title are constructed adjacent to the development. H:\Projects\213004316\W P\RPT-City of Tigard-Type 11 Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 47 M M . Response: The site for the proposed project is located on the previously developed SW Shady Lane.This standard does not apply. 4. Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall meet the standards of this chapter. Response: The site for the proposed project is located on the previously developed SW Shady Lane. No new streets are proposed.This standard does not apply. 5. If the city could and would otherwise require the applicant to provide street improvements, the city engineer may accept a future improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements if one or more of the following conditions exist:... Response: The site for the proposed project is located on the previously developed SW Shady Lane. No street improvements are required.This standard does not apply. 6. The standards of this chapter include the standard specifications adopted by the city engineer pursuant to 18.810.020.B. Response:This standard is understood. 7. The approval authority may approve adjustments to the standards of this chapter if compliance with the standards would result in an adverse impact on natural features such as wetlands, bodies of water, significant habitat areas, steep slopes, or existing mature trees. The approval standards would have a substantial adverse impact on existing development or would preclude development on the property where the development is proposed. In approving an adjustment to the standards, the approval authority shall balance the benefit of the adjustment with the impact on the public interest represented by the standards. In evaluating the impact on the public interest, the approval authority shall consider the criteria listed in paragraph E.1 of this section. An adjustment to the standards may not be granted if the adjustment would risk public safety. Response: No adjustments are requested.This standard is understood. B. Creation of rights-of-way for streets and related purposes. Rights-of-way shall be created through the approval of a final subdivision plat or major partition; however, the council may •M1 approve the creation of a street by acceptance of a deed, provided that such street is deemed essential by the council for the purpose of general traffic circulation.... Response: The site for the proposed project is located on the previously developed SW Shady Lane. No creation of rights of way is required.This standard does not apply. C. Creation of access easements. The approval authority may approve an access easement established by deed without full compliance with this title provided such an easement is the only reasonable method by which a lot large enough to develop can be created.... Response: The site for the proposed project is currently developed and contains no access easements. No access easements are proposed and this proposal does not include the creation of any new lots.This standard does not apply. ' D. Street location, width and grade. Except as noted below, the location, width and grade of all streets shall conform to an approved street plan and shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets, to topographic conditions, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed use of the land to be served by such streets:... Response: The site for the proposed project is located on the previously developed SW Shady Lane. No creation of streets is required.This standard does not apply. H:\Projects\233004316\W%RPT-City of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.door 48 M M . E. Minimum rights-of-way and street widths. Unless otherwise indicated on an approved street plan, or as needed to continue an existing improved street or within the downtown district, street right-of-way and roadway widths shall not be less than the minimum width described below. Where a range is indicated, the width shall be determined by the decision-making authority based upon anticipated average daily traffic (ADT) on the new street segment. (The city council may adopt by resolution, design standards for street construction and other public improvements. The design standards will provide guidance for determining improvement requirements within the specified ranges.) These are presented in Table 18.810.1.... Response: The site for the proposed project is located on the previously developed SW Shady Lane. No creation of rights of way is required.This standard does not apply. F. Future street plan and extension of streets.... Response:The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street. No street extension is required or proposed.This section does not apply. G. Street spacing and access management. Refer to 18.705.030.H. Response: The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street system. No new streets are required or proposed.This section does not apply. H. Street alignment and connections.... Response: The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street system. No new streets are required or proposed.This section does not apply. 1. Intersection angles. Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect at an angle as near to a right angle as practicable, except where topography requires a lesser angle, but in no case shall the angle be less than 75o unless there is special intersection design, and:... Response: The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street system. No new streets are required or proposed.This section does not apply. J. Existing rights-of-way. Whenever existing rights-of-way adjacent to or within a tract are of less than standard width, additional rights-of-way shall be provided at the time of subdivision or development. Response: The subject site is located on SW Shady Lane, which has a standard half width of 30' to centerline.This standard does not apply. K. Partial street improvements. Partial street improvements resulting in a pavement width of less than 20 feet, while generally not acceptable, may be approved where essential to reasonable development when in conformity with the other requirements of these regulations, and when it will be practical to require the improvement of the other half when the adjoining property developed. Response: The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street system. No partial street improvements are required or proposed.This standard does not apply. L. Culs-de-sacs.... Response: The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street system, and does not include any residential units. No new cuts-de-sacs are required or proposed. This section does not apply. M. Street names. Response:The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street. No new street names are required or proposed.This standard does not apply. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RRT-City of Tigard-Type li Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doo 49 M M . N. Grades and curves.... Response:The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street. No new streets are required or proposed.This section does not apply. 0. Curbs, curb cuts, ramps, and driveway approaches. Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080, and: 1. Concrete curbs and driveway approaches are required; except: 2. Where no sidewalk is planned, an asphalt approach may be constructed with city engineer approval;and 3. Asphalt and concrete driveway approaches to the property line shall be built to city configuration standards. Response: The site currently has one driveway access of only 24'; this application includes the installation of a standard City of Tigard commercial driveway, although no changes to the location of the driveway/vehicle access from SW Shady Lane are proposed. As shown in the attached plans, the proposed driveway will be 30'wide.This standard is met. P. Streets adjacent to railroad right-of-way. Wherever the proposed development contains or is adjacent to a railroad right-of-way, provision shall be made for a street approximately parallel to and on each side of such right-of-way at a distance suitable for the appropriate use of the land. The distance shall be determined with due consideration at cross streets or the minimum distance required for approach grades and to provide sufficient depth to allow screen planting along the railroad right-of-way in nonindustrial areas. Response:The subject site is not adjacent to railroad right-of-way.This standard does not apply. r Q. Access to arterials and collectors. Where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection ' for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. The design shall include any of the following:... Response:The subject site located on an existing street with approved access, and does not include any residential uses.This standard does not apply. R. Alleys, public or private.... Response:The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street. No new alleys are required or proposed.This section does not apply. S. Survey monuments. Upon completion of a street improvement and prior to acceptance by the city, it shall be the responsibility of the developer's registered professional land surveyor to provide certification to the city that all boundary and interior monuments shall be reestablished and protected. Response:The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street. No rstreet improvements are required or proposed.This standard does not apply. T. Private streets.... Response:The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street. No private streets are required or proposed.This section does not apply. ' U. Railroad crossings. Where an adjacent development results in a need to install or improve a railroad crossing, the cost for such improvements may be a condition of development approval, H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-0ty of Tigard-Type ll Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.door 50 M . or another equitable means of cost distribution shall be determined by the public works director and approved by the commission. Response:The subject site is not adjacent to railroad and does not require a new or improvements to an existing railroad crossing.This standard does not apply. V. Street signs. The city shall install all street signs, relative to traffic control and street names, as specified by the city engineer for any development. The cost of signs shall be the responsibility of the developer. Response:The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street. No new street signs are required or proposed.This standard does not apply. W. Mailboxes. Joint mailbox facilities shall be provided in all residential developments, with each joint mailbox serving at least two dwelling units. Response:This proposal is for a commercial project; no residential uses are included.This standard does not apply. X. Traffic signals. The location of traffic signals shall be noted on approved street plans. Where a proposed street intersection will result in an immediate need for a traffic signal, a signal meeting approved specifications shall be installed. The cost shall be included as a condition of development. Response:The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street. No new traffic signals or streets are required or proposed.This standard does not apply. Y. Street light standards. Street lights shall be installed in accordance with regulations adopted by the city's direction. Response: The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street with street lights, including one several feet from the site near the southwest corner. No street lights are required or proposed.This section does not apply. Z. Street name signs. Street name signs shall be installed at all street intersections. Stop signs and other signs may be required. Response:The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street. No new traffic intersections or street name signs are required or proposed.This standard does not apply. AA. Street cross-sections. The final lift of asphalt concrete pavement shall be placed on all new constructed public roadways prior to final city acceptance of the roadway and within one year of the conditional acceptance of the roadway unless otherwise approved by the city engineer. The final lift shall also be placed no later than when 90% of the structures in the new development are completed or three years from the commencement of initial construction of the development, whichever is less... Response:The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street. No new streets are required or proposed.This standard does not apply. BB. Traffic calming. When, in the opinion of the city engineer, the proposed development will create a negative traffic condition on existing neighborhood streets, such as excessive speeding, the developer may be required to provide traffic calming measures. These measures may be required within the development and/or offsite as deemed appropriate. As an alternative, the developer may be required to deposit funds with the city to help pay for traffic calming measures that become necessary once the development is occupied and the city engineer determines that the additional traffic from the development has triggered the need for traffic calming measures. The city engineer will determine the amount of funds required, and will collect said funds from the H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-city of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 51 M M . developer prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, or in the case of subdivision, prior to the approval of the final plat. The funds will be held by the city for a period of five years from the date of issuance of certificate of occupancy, or in the case of a subdivision, the date of final plat approval. Any funds not used by the city within the five-year time period will be refunded to the developer. Response:This standard is understood. CC. Traffic study. 1. A traffic study shall be required for all new or expanded uses or developments under any of the following circumstances: a. When they generate a 10%or greater increase in existing traffic to high collision intersections identified by Washington County. b. Trip generations from development onto the city street at the point of access and the existing ADT fall within the following ranges: Existing ADT ADT to be added by 0-3,000 vpd development 3,001-6,000 vpd 2,000 vpd >6,000 vpd 1,000vpd 500 vpd or more c. If any of the following issues become evident to the city engineer: i. High traffic volumes on the adjacent roadway that may affect movement into or out of the site. ii. Lack of existing left-turn lanes onto the adjacent roadway at the proposed access drive(s). iii. Inadequate horizontal or vertical sight distance at access points. iv. The proximity of the proposed access to other existing drives or intersections is a potential hazard. v. The proposal requires a conditional use permit or involves a drive- through operation. vi. The proposed development may result in excessive traffic volumes on adjacent local streets. 2. In addition, a traffic study may be required for all new or expanded uses or developments under any of the following circumstances: a. When the site is within 500 feet of an ODOT facility; and/or b. Trip generation from a development adds 300 or more vehicle trips per day to an ODOT facility; and/or c. Trip generation from a development adds 50 or more peak hour trips to an ODOT facility. Response: The attached traffic study has been prepared in accordance with the above standards. It addresses the adequacy of intersection sight distances, intersection capacity and operation, and safety. The traffic study concludes no mitigation is recommended.This standard is met. 18.810.050 Easements A. Easements. Easements for sewers, drainage, water mains, electric lines or other public utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions, and where a development is traversed by a watercourse or drainageway, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of the watercourse. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT-city of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doo 52 M M . Response: The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street, and is fully served with utilities and drainage catch basins, which will be replaced with new catch basins, on-site. No new easements are required or proposed.This standard does not apply. B. Utility easements.A property owner proposing a development shall make arrangements with the city, the applicable district, and each utility franchise for the provision and dedication of utility easements necessary to provide full services to the development. The city's standard width for public main line utility easements shall be 15 feet unless otherwise specified by the utility company, applicable district, or city engineer. Response: The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing street, and is fully served with utilities. No new easements are required or proposed. This standard does not apply. 18.810.060 Lots A. Size and shape. Lot size, width, shape and orientation shall be appropriate for the location of the development and for the type of use contemplated, and:... Response: The site for the proposed project is currently developed and located on an existing lot. No new lots are required or proposed.This section does not apply. 18.810.070 Sidewalks A. Sidewalks. All industrial streets and private streets shall have sidewalks meeting city standards along at least one side of the street.All other streets shall have sidewalks meeting city standards along both sides of the street. A development may be approved if an adjoining street has sidewalks on the side adjoining the development, even if no sidewalk exists on the other side of the street. Response: The subject site is currently developed and served by sidewalks on both sides of SW Shady Lane.This standard is met. B. Requirement of developers. 1. As part of any development proposal, or change in use resulting in an additional 1,000 vehicle trips or more per day, an applicant shall be required to identify direct, safe (1.25 x the straight line distance) pedestrian routes within 1/2 mile of their site to all transit facilities and neighborhood activity centers (schools, parks, libraries, etc.). In addition, the developer may be required to participate in the removal of any gaps in the pedestrian system off-site if justified by the development. Response: As demonstrated in the attached traffic study, the project will not generate more than 1,000 vehicle trips per day.This standard does not apply. 2. If there is an existing sidewalk on the same side of the street as the development within 300 feet of a development site in either direction, the sidewalk shall be extended from the site to meet the existing sidewalk, subject to rough proportionality (even if the sidewalk does not serve a neighborhood activity center). Response: The subject site is currently developed and served by sidewalks on both sides of SW Shady Lane.This standard does not apply. C. Planter strip requirements. A planter strip separation of at least five feet between the curb and the sidewalk shall be required in the design of streets, except where the following conditions exist: there is inadequate right-of-way; the curbside sidewalks already exist on predominant portions of the street; it would conflict with the utilities; there are significant natural features H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPTfiity of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV/dm 53 M M . (large trees, water features, significant habitat areas, etc.) that would be destroyed if the sidewalk were located as required; or where there are existing structures in close proximity to the street(15 feet or less)or where the standards in Table 18.810.1 specify otherwise.Additional consideration for exempting the planter strip requirement may be given on a case-by-case basis if a property abuts more than one street frontage. Response:This application is for the renovation of an existing building and site; the existing curbing will be maintained on the frontage of SW Shady Lane and landscaping will be provided in the existing (see attached plans, sheet L2.3).This standard does not apply but is met. D. Maintenance. Maintenance of sidewalks, curbs, and planter strips is the continuing obligation of the adjacent property owner. Response: Maintenance of the sidewalks, curbs, and planter strips will be the responsibility of the owner and they will be kept in good repair.This standard is met. E. Application for permit and inspection. If the construction of a sidewalk is not included in a performance bond of an approved subdivision or the performance bond has lapsed, then every person, firm or corporation desiring to construct sidewalks as provided by this chapter, shall, before entering upon the work or improvement, apply for a street opening permit to the Engineering Department to so build or construct:... Response:The subject site is currently developed and served by a completed sidewalk.This section does not apply. F. Council initiation of construction. In the event one or more of the following situations are found by the council to exist, the council may adopt a resolution to initiate construction of a sidewalk in accordance with city ordinances: Response: The subject site is currently developed and served by a completed sidewalk. This standard does not apply. H:Projects\213004316\WP RPi-atyofTigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.dom 54 M . IV. SUMMARY Based on the information presented and discussed in this narrative and the attached supporting plans and documentation, the proposed project meets the established standards and criteria and merits approval. The proposed layout is the most efficient and effective one that meets the standards, and the proposed allowed commercial use and associated site improvements will benefit the surrounding area. H:\Projects\213004316\WP\RPT{Ry of Tigard-Type II Site Development Review-140602 REV 2.doa 55 -) q City of Tigard Land Use Permit Application PRE-APP.HELD BY: I TIG.ARTJ: _ _ f E Fie# Other Case# Date . By Receipt# Fee Date Complete I TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑Adjustment/Variance(II) ❑Historic Overlay(II or III) ®Site Development Review(II) J ❑Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) ❑Home Occupation(II) ❑Subdivision(II or III) ❑ Conditional Use(III) ❑Minor Land Partition(II) ❑Zone Change(III) 1 ❑Development Code Amendment(IV) ❑Planned Development(III) ❑ Zone Change Annexation(IV) 0 Downtown Design Review(II,III) ❑Sensitive Lands Review(II or III) - NOTE: FOR REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS,PLEASE REFER TO YOUR PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES LOCATION WHERE PROPOSED ACTIvriYWILL OCCUR(Address if available) 9785 SW Shady Lane TAX MAPS&TAX LOT NOS. i R272868 - 1S135BD 00200 _ Tu AL I`rESIZE - I ZONING CLASSIFICATION 0 .44 AC I Mixed Use Commercial (MUC) —I APPLICANT* 1111 MAJ Development Corp ] MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 300 West 15th Street, Suite 200 Vancouver, WA 98660 PI-IONE NO. FAX NU. j 360-823-5102 PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON PHONE NO. Mike Jenkins E-MAIL mikej@majdevelopment .com - PROPERTY IY OWN E•R/DEED HOLDER(Attach Ji,if more than one) Stanley & Audene Nored MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP II 511 NE 21st P1 Canby, OR 97013 1 PHONE NO. I=AX NO. *When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY(Please be specific) Redevelop former gas station/playground equipment store into drive-through coffee shcv with associated site improvements_ ICity of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 f www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 2 THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • If the application is granted, the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. 1110 4110, z y Zoir ..: - "ate - s ., :.-s Signa ;..� ak.e. .1, I � Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date e. 3 Drive-Thru Retail Site y 9785 SW Shady Lane � >;R Tigard, Oregon : f. SITE - ice:. ..•.. '%i. ' -------':i!• /yc � •-/ � 1.1 y ra R �: c _ -_,�F i r�' : _ d _ Lamhert Conforma l Canic eeeMrr PsaN ,Ap • / 111.: -.,,cooce.„- -- .. - CtiMGs-ZBYa nI3' gn ° 6030 SCALE 1 inch-60feei Source Data _ , etro FLte Base Data.March 2014 Geographic Projection Information yNAD 83 HAFN,Oregon No 0 • -11 iiipliplik ,. emminie 04. viajslmOtitimvn ..../.. • • • -9' s "YDk 503.22 rth,� H X y _yejC� /� ? ,_,,,. £.o Y - - s - _ .a ixk , " - Yr i� %// </ ^ " ' � a� i s z•-••--'--:-;:-.91k .''''''''''''- _ / ? ydH7/ 1 ` i:1$1-04611111041111811.1111,10,t111,114. 91 � 6 �• air �1 /g/ // ' r / t3`, , / / k Az// / " , . / / , i" , e / : WP/rAl %. 4 ,j -Y?re `i, . p : g � :E iis .,,AN� .{ : , . 2„ , r i ,. , , // � /" rk ° h \> rm .. , . „ , •✓r .. a"�. l , r, iy ,ibe ,,/ ' ,F /, ,, ,„.. r , e . ” rySM\ 1teate" ,� ;,:� -..,:11.i„°, � ` l. • • 4.5 0X-��k ` , _ ' ; _ ,.,R„�, c�„, :,,,,v,-.:,-,•••,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„:„:..",,,,,,,::,::•,,:••� � 4MAYE':o' ��Ms' .. fz -' 4.9560 • E 503.2 28.1285 + M CKN2£.CO...M ntribnuStot �' • C' s w :.Iter t>' . .. s.:e ..\. m N " ? -� g y /y ' i� ? I ( i I Drive-Thru Retail 217 Oak St Site & Vicinity ter I C 9785 SW Shady Lane Ti -- a Oregon g r ' .� r 2, •••••••,,,g.N. ,;:.,,,,,,,17 l . I \ i \ 1 +t I } J ,� t ,t J; \ 1 1 I / rj \,f I i 1 M1 F I f SITE �` ; I r .� L (0.44 AC ''''' ',-$:;,'„ ,. 0 5 sD .^'.,.� , feet ,. � - SCALE finch=1 5 0 f eet1 19,382 SF --,, I , / _ Source Metro RL Lamhert ISonitor8asl e CDoanfiac , March 2014�` _ WShady: , ,u ,r /a Geographic Projection InformationCJCG -d E( ivdi \, — — — _ _ — — NAD 83 HARD,Oregon North0 II -.-- — / locatmn I -...._.,., , y bib / t r / � r i IT , , , , . ,, I /IN i OpenStreetMap(and;) ,/ i contributors, CC-BY-SAP 111: � _ r I �� / ;/ ( 503.224.9560 503.228.1285 :v neKlvze.coxa 7 ,- �� S — v rE k •j C 1515>E Ar,-...w tc)O,Pnrtl c R S;:'- -^" ;` �--- , "" _,,, _ j © MACKENZIE 2014 �......_.... — '-- •----'" ` -,�..... ;. , RIGH- RESERVED Ii i , ,I II I I � FeMAhwaEreL3aesmnxa I PMroecR Noa31o00n3 .16F I �_ ^j 1 (— I — ._ Drive-Thru Retail \ Site & Vicinity f, 9 z r dy L ne 785 SW Sha a Tigard, Oregon II LEGEND MUE Site 4. ZONE I O I MUC MUE-1 ............... ....... MUC y R 12 r / - tT S[ ! E R-4.5 Isl 0.44 AC 150eet 0 r • _ 3 SCALE 1 inch 150 feet � _...,� 19,382 5F �� . � �� � -� I ,: .. \7 ..� K. �.«w<,.. .,.tea, f ,. � '-" So D to w ���' ''-• ' 'L., z"' :. � � �� Metro RLlS Lite Base Data,Marsh 2U la � • ., .max.. R I .. •^ "�, ,; 1:: _.. ... _... _a:.............. ...... Geo ra hic Pro action Information •`'"n ;i 3 -,' \ ''! NAD 83 DARN,Oregon North 7 Mandan "' "" -- Lam Gert Conformal Conic w } . ,.�„' ,'" T g Location Map i �� iz p r / / a { u *::'/_,, ,.*_:,:..',W:, r � - f J ! f r I4.: ( 1I („t) coOpenStreetMap(andel �� i .., -' -- n nbutor C-BY-S is y ._.. _ _. t i 1 i 1 l� '%:: • I �"� / /r' G I - 503.224.95fi0 F.503.228.7285 :" MCKN2E.COM : '.' �,,• i -,t r l>.S SE tv tc Ave t� lck,Pt,Jr,:.c „-F>a.'21..: I ( 'e'g ' / .�----—_'.�.�.- ...._— I �� �+ MAGKENZIE 2014 .. ,,..� '""''� 3:F ' © ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDl '''''''',,Alil,::ri,i'!,,,,;-:'3,i.' *.:','...'-!,-5 ,-:::tt' 5a!t,• 32Ps.:iF _- :---- , ...� �� i �Ir E + ( �y6 Date 3/zs/ia I aperea,ed bK ws \ s:: .:::: .� �_ :=7------1 ...._..___. File mn,Shady Lane u3uuaz ie ....� ,Iiillt)i i,b,',...:,..,..... ..".... .,,,,,,,,.,,,..- +Ire m cro a M . RETAIL AT SHADY LANE Arthitecture•InteriorsPlanning•Engineering • F I, {g SW Oak LL St - rw�rOR yf _ _ - __t,: 312.9560 e» I- i_____ _ _ - URI*WA - 2062499991 wwwmaammo9 K MACKENZIE. srtc Ceti APPLICANT p.m Rw oeJaHa�Pr Lar. 1 /fq�/NF ANCOUYr�AtO5�5WA Oi.SUITE 2mI6ni 61ifff �.: 4/ . PH:(3!O)OOO-5125 YAPCOUIER.WA wane 3TYEaM'ade OyUI -I-- _ _ CONTACT PERSON _ 48 ! \ MACKENAT AN 9311,12A5 1515 SE WATER A .SUITE tao .--_ Nt(50 229-728 y—'-- PORTLAND OR 97214 -- f 14'7 r.- FAX 216-1215 CP/IL/PLANNING/LAND /wwMAlplaaccvn st =, / • - .IRL/PI AHrIrG/LAND ARC I I / MACKENZIE W WM.." ATTN:BOB Remit-53/RYAN SOERA/RON HEIDEN 001 NAWISTREET.MITE 10 P 0)VANCOUVER, 0 (1111 VICNTY MAP GNC 380 083-003) scYE Nn /�""'`: K E-MA FdF�aamm.awn/IBISRInamiaown/RAc�naaTK..aMn „ " ,IISEllill. ARCFRECT prow RETAL \\ I9AN0 NT ARCHITECTS i s� 3511sw HOOD AAENUE,MITE 200 LNIF&�DY PORRAND,OR 97239 Rh. )220-851) I(((J��� FAY 22GFB510 / 7A it j�, nantlM�mbamlELcwn W168M 9910V WE SITE ADDRESS ZaSi.B�.Yea.4• SURVEYOR nuzQ OR 97135 SSW SHADY UNE _•/�10R1R • NORT IVE SURVEYING INC ATM 0.16911STUBBS PLACE. OREGON /........__________ • • 1015 HIT 189TH 9200£.SI1TE 2030• . BG�RiO!OR 8]000 PH.(503)ON-212] LEGAL DESCRIPTION I —" — J i L E-MAIL:*222010090 '-,'��yk..I A PAROEL 6 L.wO NOTED AT / © r-PLAN .......;,-47.-:`'" TAP LOT 200.YM 15-1-3580 IbENES T „S CO..O SNE 1'-5O _ VERTICAL DATUM 200 +znv151 50 110.44 T BENCHMARKISBS ASB ON SK LOCATED T TOP CON CONCRETE • • -- 46 GUARDRAIL AT THE NORTHEAST COMER OF THE SW GREENBURO ROAD (p T]cr)I� OVERPASS ACROSS 1.11010AY 217.THE BE111,2ARK 110 41NN IS 020,01212,40 MettIO1 10 11C U. 203.03 FEET CN THE NOVO 1828 DATUM. 1 men-so n ATOREV1S0€ EXCA OREGON UW REOIINES YOU S�T _X Baa9 arz ATTENTION: GOIN O FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE �[SS .. OREGON ORM NOTIF GATpH CORM. COD COVER SHEET 11105E RULES ARE SET FORTH N IMA COSTING CONOITIO S AND OENGJn06 PLAN 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-031-0090.YOU MAY OBGM C2.1 SITE PLAN COPES O!THE HUES BY GLENO THE CENTER G2.2 SITE GRADING RAN (NOTE THE TELEPHDIE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY IORFICABON C23 UTILITY RAN CENTER IS 1-000-332-23H OR 011.) 03.0 E1D9011 NO SDNO9i CONTROL PUH C5.1 EROA01 AND SEDIMENT CCNTROL NOTES AND GETABS SNEER ItRE ,,),0MOt/f/C�r COV 1.20TREE PRESEAYAn06 NA REMOVAL STE PUN S ,4 t 9% L21 TREE CANOPY SITE PUN T � 12.2 PARKING LOT AND STREET TREE CANOPY AND SOIL VP..PUN (1 C11• t L23 LANDSCAPE PUN 8 8. .0 TOPOGRAPHIC SRVE1 X60 2T EIEYAn065 RO R PUH DRAWN BY:RLF UNOOKYDUNO MUT TELEPHONE PLAN D0 TELEPHONE HUM% TR)SI/SITE PUN CHECKED BY: SHEET: NW NATURAL GAS Y ED!70N-6.9m 50.1-220-A-2 0-4211 CO.O CIGARS 503-228-1211 PGE 503-520-442D OAT3r 1-BOP-573-1311 VE10Z06 501-043-2018 00 02 .15 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVEW: 6-3-14 M . / / ..Interiors i' Prolord.0111 51.249.0 YeettlAYA1 i' 3066019991 i/ % /% _'_ MACKENZIE. i ji /� A�Y,TCAW __�_ Tu LOT Xo 1w EEjaaP�fCCfP. sun ZOO 110 1,1-3560 l300 NEM 15114 MEET �/ 0r21ib N / /��j e�miit nRux mr[.vr�Ynr YAMCOlM9t MA Y!!EO OI=N5959'02T / 1 �.RA¢s aCS0Y56W-I i r.A3'V / gr ti m e, _,-,-,•,,,..„,,,,,,,.„__,_b 5 Cmat OYo uu\wTwuc Ylvsi a -- / IR.Ro. ,/�/ --4,;„;,,,4 w"/�/ / / // A. / / �///� RRiAS.W. IO / ��r`� / // /// --Vi Kl A9NMt KEYNOTES /,// jjjjjj/ go "�■v.a 5/ ro j 1. REMOVE COSTING CANOPY / / , / /;,{, / I / r 2 REMOVE COSTING CUR AL / LANE / 1011k // / 'L .','f j%9 a. aulo CVE OSTING�T AT SHADY / � 4. 2%"' 274'%i ,..e" j%/ 1 LT-+� s. REUOYE COSTING T Owns / I / '�171•� // i unnT s EXISTING CUM To REMAIN �/ / j� /%/ / �/ 12_ , REMOVE COSTING ASPHALT ms elYeVO/LNE ) % � T //I�/ g.� WWI/ r j/ Ir, H' '. ., �/ j I _ 15-1-35110 6 FASTING POWER TO REMAIN TpMQ al / 9' %r W't 345 S DARE a. /140/ % IJ III , M . / A gME*TElww.Interiors /" KEYNOTES Q+ if/ t 1. C COSTING SIG CO 1Ao. CARO BE 4L REBRANDED s os 2 INSTALL LANDSCAPING % 1 INSTALL TRASH ENCLOSURE SEE ARC ITECMIAL PIANS Yu,®5�.n I/ 4. EJOSTRIG S(N r0 REMAIN AND BE RFBFAIQFD 206X99953 / /�•_` i PATCH E2041wG 6PEwALK www,6lCMXw11 / � 6 "D'� MACKENZIE. j7. MPLAFE E7osmmc DRIPErAr MTH cGNaETE smErAuc __ ../.1 .-.-..''.-..'-..-..'..-•••••••• INSTALL Y CURB BREAM a. SINSTALL ADA CCPIJMT RAMP iMJ[leH.pPL�(f Q7fP. �Q 700 MST�1 EMEET OP / 0.INSTALL ADA CO PART CC MA RAMP sunE 200 ��/ 11. NSTALL ADA SIGN YA ZOI WA 91000 �" � il�Aa°'a 3M"T`L ' ��'�j 1(� - mars afw- lz cwwEre moose D WAX FE ' Q -- -- la EXIstING[I1RR M61 FENCE ro RDA. ...........,...........,.....„..../1 j 1 - 14. rem rim NTH 200 QUEUING LENGTH 5 �6G mLE--I 6 Mb;M. 1a REPLACE COSTING CATCH BASIN nTH cu1TFa s L9f Hw SIX �vATPY 16. BIKE RACK FOR TNI SPACES(2.a.6.EACH) O L Ramat. 17. SIGHT LIGHT NTN CUTOFF TENSE j ® is MENU BOARD _ EXISTP BLDG I. I 16 SPEAKER (3._. yI(p � M e0I11110 f >. a° CO 0 • 21.PRE-MENU BOARD t l.6 L.4, _ 21 HEIGHT 0EArtu+LE BAR j" / - ':: n �4 ■ie11�Yi�j■a3 - - n DIRECTION.-STORAGE SCif7 iliiOi z4. CURB w91 nnl ASPHALT}[ se67t1/� H Bs0AT SHADY / / m / o ` _ , 4r4�.N_O\0� r -, .; u za BJYPEN OVERHANG j /I m ml�i. © "� ALAN OR �• / .,., ®• r �,rMI 41 7A m LiUOh'LAIE �® la tri '� j X3.96 © lQmp mli� .6 m /Al (\k,..4' ® ■ m t e S. . / ' N'''''I'LL-.: . ...4 77-4-(1: Aal SW SHAOV LANE O O " ®„ /i// / �_--_ ____—_____-_— —__p_�___—____—_.__ —___--_—___ BENSONS: MIM T •� - _ _ ATL I I /------- ' 0 SITE PLAN SHEET TIME: n • - + �� SITE PLAN = o ' P(a:)R P CURB RADIUS SITE DATA PARKING DATA REWIRED CM PARXwG DRAM BY:RIT ALL C1R9 MU ARE a0 UNLESS OTIIERn4 INDICATED EXISTING 91E AREA 19.]15 S O.M AC PPROPOSED BLDG AREA gAN7d1'O1G W06T SFD _ STANDARD IS A 2056 ()/1,000) 11.4 C00150 BT: TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA - (31.32) toss S O]PACI 0T: i TOTAL BUILDING MF2 - 2.056 S (10.68) REOLOFD BICYCLE PARKA.(� PARKING REQUIRED TOTAL COPE ISLE/PARKING AREA -11,a33 S (s6.11) TOTAL M * 20366 ) e 3 C2.1 C//� PROPOSED/00005015 MEA •123Rd SF (56.72 EXISTING 800095010 9AEACE5 -10,013 S (6271) EXISTING BUILDING - 2015 S 005050 PAJ60NG/ORIIE ISLE •11695 S JOB 050. 213004315 SITE DEVELOPMENT IEEE ' 6-3-14 I I 1 ! 1 1 I i 1 I _ ORADt1O NOTES 'ININFITibeZrza:2TAMa,....'"Valan,... M M P00.14.1 n u / r `an °�'COEawi oRwo ,.. ,.m ArtNtec4...Bea. ""'Wit9dVana".'•eir•flocucc"PanVeleree"mos."'" Kenning•Engineering / ...nen.Re nee•ce nese.As soon MAIM RR 114ocava e s,- plifiumpa CORE/164 Of.131 MC hr.01,061.0 WI WAX CROCE AT PANED 61 IMOSC.M61 MEAD .1 fl ORM j _ 47 ..RSM„ "41 ''/ 1[MELTE MOM PREVEMLIEN ITED AT INE MOOG 16601... / / CMITROL DEW=MAT DE,R ..... .�. // /. ,%//, �' %•�•._ ea.6TECTI v�»o:'€. ��.. MACKENZIE. MON MC MOT .,arA,TrK� mgr .. .. / / �;,K 900 t]E\sar1M CORP ° / j',/ s0,........66.66..., WEER tsnt MEET Q- EFat VANoaN6l WA MOO V ra nAmi rAwrt AC A RA061640 OWEN OM 11.6 MEET '.m"n'roNcsrm'As'7'AA.6,1„605760 MC. ;o� 0�e mra r' ��42 j ~" ,� _y..-.�e� ._- AT DORM..m4 A T"/ . B ERC� dK \ ., t.- .,,�a tee. 0600111100A/10114 :.,.TTw \/ a . " m ' ' / / BUSING BLDG j - wax wwuT j /'/ :' �� 'X4211.1-be-y. SEAL COAT `.-... ;� 1„„...... �Id. AVM? �TAL � °1OR / / " " -.-_. -k Ai:v4 lNNN!! ,R. AATA.,° eL w.wN rrTAA.Az. AT SHADY ) /// LAM i� A., , APPROMAIE MEM Of,., i ��.�io 0 POMP,�� 1" «/ . W.,, p., A„. j II P, GR .K �1 � � n SW SHADY LANE •1,‘ A ®.LL TSP / / Cf1ADNG LEGEND - SITE GRADING PLAN .\ �� „'• I TC SHEET SITE TITLE. PRGPEBAn UNE ' e .�'r///��� -N 1G ORAO_K3 —34 EXISTING CONTOUR 10 ° ,° nyp btR 'f ..`I�—'\/ �µ —3A— ,-R CONTOUR _..•,I Dia I'!I—/`\ �I...•• —35S-R CWTCOR - IJ `- OT O AS€ :a ,i.A.IAC ",^L ® SPOT MADE GRAM!BY:RIF tin TOP ar CURB GRABS ..- OM. u®k TOP CE ASPHALT GRADE DECKED or r. , 1 ® /� m;e TOP fF COIGRETE WADE `OP e4� C2.2 rE=AN To0FEuuM , IS aoe NNo. 2130043.15 SITE DEVELOPt SPT REVIEW 6-3-14 M . / WIRY NOTES ..Interiors .�/ a . ` i _ —/ � COMM.08 la a.060.9 Salltra. Rama OR 99.22/MO Liaa08199 *a,. mop-ros.fa 360.6051/119 TAH , �rliarIA01�, " ''"..ro°.E"" MACKENZIE. % .1.1.STOW arta/ ,, : aO1.3TOLl ,. a-S KU p�g0Blf ppP. 4' . .'.� • ant 2 869 .. ...�.a 10 w..,,a Awa. am.wren+e�r MAE 930 �4� / union •m '9m�c w ...'v�'°'�`980 u•PPM ''''''...„..„.........,/ • 000/1i 8.:C8901 33/1130VIER'mimeo f ,wumuR, •r. FIOS7ING ST(Y2M SEMFR ORAIA710N INF // 11( / 4,/ ''�` EASING BLDG M ':_-, p:vrsul j j / ItAOA Live/ 3 1,0110.0)112, i�{li�i>E"'DSI Ir OUT 0)mr / / i Q 1 (1tNA 3 L I Slf Mr AT SH ADY ) , , 1.11;*� mr LME ��. ! 1� F°W Rmi�r> 3111-1 MG=143N q 9A69M 8MDl LME M' �K 110MD.ON Lazo) 11. 511-1 YAW I ligniiii '/ Z,t ., aco,"''''1112,70TIOT"' 0 , / / ,L LL 4 - -. nnP`~ �� }f)PIiES,1/3»{15} / lI • I _ ------ / > \\ * SW SHADY LANE -- ,3 ®� / - ---- — -- — — — ---, — ., , . ,m / - $IOIM ,/ _/ -.— /_ LRT k ••� - dL_� sA= re=W. .. / ' SI E 11i1LffY PLAN SKET TITLE: COE UTLITY . . .�� „ me a rm>IO e. PLAN ` IMAM en inr oa C Eq(m BY: arcEr: C2.3 .108 N0. s1306aa15 SfTE DEVELOPMENT fW1 6-3-14 • M . ArcNMM•interiors // Pogo*OH S01224 9SSO MO S .A 206.7.9993 7-, A.-�� MACKE�NZIE. ,.�_.'',.-;,'/::,/?:"11-::--:::;',1'.>"-...-1;:;::'..11:;':';',''''' MI'DEVELC011311r CCM. . euro ; ,., so»Mr en,srt�r /MIR 200 ��2 //j/ f � S / /i s MIME H. ! wl�o. /,/,,.:,///,://,,,,,,,'4::, . / 1, EXISTTIG siDG 8.........'.---"\----"" i . I/ I i.. 'Amos WENN LEO - / FETAL I.L.T PRIRECTOI AT SWOT \ / ////'' '.i,',1;'!;,;'' 1°. :. ... L-iiii---41'411111111 ill 1 / 4p. �� YM 9N MAIN LANE IN 1 /(( , -,/,''''.-'1// 71�YD,011 /i. / ' mia / 0' 1/ -\ L‘--• �© ' d 4 /. ma�,a�caEr � i • , O ger` ' — ! me / ` Orr' W �`-,�.Q r�e -- -. WIRES /1 / '4 SW SHADY LANE to // - - - - --- - ----------- , r'E,m�.�. ,.m EVISICHS I EROSION APD SEDNENT CONTROL PLAN 7 , ®EROSION AND SEDIAelsIT CONTROL PLAN w a MO CET NS SEE SEE1 nl SHEET nnE: T31003N AND EEL:WE iT CONTROL m o m mcaner)a ro RAN I DRAM BVnu- DM CHECKED Br. WEER C5.0 .m Bo. 2130043.15 srtE DEvELoPr erir REVIEW 6-3-14 • M N ArchftecM•MtMOFs GRADING STREFT AND UULITY EROSION MID SEDIMENT Planning•EDMIneMNB :=7.7-=',:......"'"7"...=",..,'",...t.."'7.4:===="7474141.—"''^`"'�'� CONSTRUCTION NOTES: •emv ,.s• w ,�® • w..•..aA•rw.a.r E 1.SEED USED FOR T[NPORARY OR PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL BE COPOS D M 7.======...""=1.......%"=•711.U....===...• . OHE OF THE FOLIDWNG MI%TURFS,UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHOAUTHORIZED:0ROAR FOR BAG MAHAL FENCE 10 ASSNsae IS MARKO A DWARF GRASS MIX(Md.100 LB./AC.) 0 • I.DWARF PERENNIAL RYEGRAA(SON BY WEIGHT) ••�' s •A®mKs.. °ON••• utw AwN a8TE • ( 1L • 2 CREEPING RED FESCUE( BY WvdT) ���.8. _ •• mmawnrr • B.STANDARD NE1.7 CRASS MIK(MN.100.8./AG) N .rKr•• rmwu.••o...•s •..s�. uwm, • 1.AM..RYECRS A (40X BY HEIGHT) 3150.695.7BAR r®ma• .....m vm a \ \ 2 TURF-TWE FESCUE(SEDER BY NOWT) NS6M RECEIVE ��� m. ®r s.dem.ir=� 19. m��o�. ` PI Fmuspx RFstRxxf ANO ATEA,. •• • 2 OGRE TO CHENED TEMPORARY d PERMANENT SEEDING 9/ALL HAVE YALE • • INDRLOCRED 91RLOE IEW0.ENED BT MEWS OP TR ERMANEN S OR THE E HA OTHER 04, .• •.SEW AiROTfD IMPREMEWTS SIRFALE ROg1ENING IMPROVa SEEDBFDONC AW REDUCES RUH-OFF VELOCITY. MACKENZIE. em.....•...mLi•. 3 LONG TERM SLOPE STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL INCLUDE THE ESTABLISHMENT ORM .........---7_, � w_ ...,.....„..........,======................................... ® '�' ♦ f. (PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER V9 SEEDING'MTN APPROVED MIX AND ® em...m.o...m�:.o.• t•r TP • _• APPLICATION RATE MAEDEB[PIBR COED. .e. . �,. =...,.. ` • . 0a..'Kd+0P• Pasts NOTES: BW WEST 16IN STREET 4.1.WITH PLASTIC MOPE STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL INCLUDE COVERING EXPOSED CUTE 700 m..or.a nsm� .� e.s mu sioFr t. OVER Z bil Sim NN. SOIL PLASTIC 9E£TNG STRAW YWCMNf WOW GRIPS OR OTHER APPROVED YANOOIA9l WA 08010 1DRDAD.0 MOO ERR. •'••• :•• NAG S STOCKPILED son_OR STRIPPMGS SIAL E PLACED IN A STABLE LOCATION AND e. n .•,� Amw.•e,.e.. croa V: wP CCMCRRATION.WRAC i WEATHER' ......w....1, m• :.. >.. �... _• • • v� iv ,,..P �6 RrzK KR.. PERIODS.sraENCE I SHALL a COVERED �°•®' • \I��\N,.\,a EON PLASTIC SHEETING A ER.E SEDIMENT FENCE REQUIRED MCMC .. ..m•Ms...�s0 �.� r:...ns�a...•m• 1 %/v 111E PERIMETER DE THE STOF]POE. 2T2Ts'RONEY NOM u 8.ElOml4D 04t OR FILL AREAS SHALL E STABILIZED40011* THRWd TINE USE:CIF ••d •== r n"1Ur yL."a,.•.•"„. PROFILE NUR Law TEMPORARY SEEDING AHO MULCHING EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS OR MATS, •'s MID-SLOPE SEDNENT FENCES OR WATTLES.OR OTHER APPROPRIATE MEASURES Epp •maw m•m.m•••om..••.•.,�.o..wr•e.A.sr DIVIDROPLENE EM, (�G1 SLOPES EXCEEDING 25X MAY REMOTE A DITIMAL ERDMd CONTROL MEASURES m,,•••=•r••n�ow.s•,rmw� ..as••••K••m••.vr• • :..... ?....."'.:'•))AT ).AREAS SUNECT TO WIND EROSION BALL USE APPROPRIATE DUST CONTROL ..ay':'K.•.':''w'l.. .< cam". s�� .�i.no.wm•®.mA•mwaA..0 ws.� WOVEN POLYPROPIENE SACK 1 E WN ��� Ds RAL MA SHEETS.INCLUDING M TIE APPLICATION OFA FINE SRAM OF RATER.IPL/4TIC v 9EETNG STAR MULCHING.OR OTHER APPROVED MEASURES. 5'j " >W Tyy,K "LE t.4' adWnd ENTRANCES SIAINSTALLED BEINSTALLEDTR IED AT E BEGINNING OF ,, m°Ae .m.a..cKVK.w.mv.newwwcrww,c 17-F.-24•177. 4%✓ ON CSTRACnd AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURAOF TIE PROJECT. Wd AmAL MEASURES NULL I INCLUDING. T LIMITEDAO,TIRE STREET SWEEPING,AND ••••••••••.•••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••• VACUUMING BE TO THAT WASHES. A QP • _ I. RECESSED C LI NLAMxw U DEM FGR TIE DURATION OF TIE PRDECT. EDD WHEN 005210 FF100 FRONT VIEW 9.ACTIVE INLETS TO STOMA RATER SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROTECTED 1X00404 THE Pn1.s1 FABRIC BE VOLET LS is BE INTEOF R LINED eED •0 0SL OF APPROVED INLET PROTEC11d MEASURES.ALL INLET P0001. 1 YFASI ES RETAL BY MANUFACTURER. TOM NA CCM....•L P.••E^°N9°K••'•"� ARE TO BE REGULARLY INSPECTED AW MANTAMD AS NEEDED. AT SHADY �^.SATURATED MATERIALS THAT ARE HARED OFF-9TE MUST BE TRANSPORTED N LANE STANDARD EROSION CONTROL NOTES 0 INLET PROTECTION © TED-TIGHT TRUO(S TO ELIMINATE SPILLAGE OF SEDIMENT AND SEDIMENT-uttN ER FORSITESLESS THAN I ACRE Rb ae..... .....4.—.W S,,M.s. TYPE 5 ac nWala�`envies SEDIMENT FENCE a�Rw oQ saves 0 1.5 x0.Ba ..r...nm O.U5 ...U-N .*I•ANK ^T.M AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE RAdNG OUT OF CONCRETE TRUCKS N OSB WI SIAM LITE DRAWING H0.930 AOEWp I[-0A DOES NOT MONDE RUN-OFT 11.91-CAN ENTER THE STON TWO,OR 1 WATER SYSTEM.E THE CONCRETE WARN-OUT AREA CAN NOT BE CONSTRUCTED GREATER TNM FROM M SO'FRY DISCHARGE PONT.S:C900.9 MEASURES SUCH M BE/NNS CR TEMPORARY SETTLING PITS MAY BE REWIRED.THE WASH-OUT SHALL RE LOCATED[ANN SO FEET OF TRUCK ACCESS AAE BE CLEARED MEN N REAOES SOIL OF THE CAPACITY. • SEDIMENT FENCE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 12.SWEEPINGS FROM EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE SHALL NOT BE TRANSFUSED c1 TO THE WATER SYSTEM.SWEEPINGS SHAT BE MOOED UP AND DISPOSED w !140;44e A 0;4 T 1) S MORN O FILTER FARC TENSE RIO BUSTIN SIONON CDENL6 CIN THE SLOPE CVRY.0 000 0S THE USE OP swamp OR EM DUTY RTW FABRIC SNL MEET E9RN STAdROS SWIM RTO FMR 1.1.MIND PAVING N WET TEAR.WHEN PAVING CLERICALS CM RLN-OFT INTO SELL COMM CORNET MY AMES Ap SIMMERS TO PROVE A MMA O A NONR6�ECIION THE STOMA WATER MIEN, tN OP[OH US9C OWSTBICIIGM UE AT A RMRASNEE RNC:OF 0 OEOE6 TO 1U DEMES. [FI[esW ' • SIAL E MED ON SNAWp EIN EDRO MORES FCR®CL 10.USE NPs RICH AS CECK-DNS,BERMS AND MET PROTECTION TO PREVENT Z) mop.at leer OILY mot New FENCE 9WL.ME 80.01000 sU1OED HOOPS FOR[TC'POSTRUIN-OFT EDEA REACHING DISCHARGE PORTS. 5 ' NSNUIIOIL STITCHES LOOPS SNL E NSNLEO ON DE 111,-1IIL SDE ORE SLOPED AREA 100 P)55 • SPACER A WNW Of A FEET AMT. 15 COVER CAT.BASINS,MANHOLES,AM OVER DISCHARGEU POINTS DEN APPLYING SEAL COAT,TACK COAT,ETC TO PREVENT NTROWCNG THESE ®1000 s 101 >) RAMC SL R FENCE OULIRE A WARN MOON HARM O SS A MOCOM.O P056 ATURA S TO TIE STORMWATER SKP I . OWNED ANEW.FROM ASTER FABRIC FREE RETNUDON SNL SE*54.EpA0AIE0 MOO All 4 . ORME THEMED NEA ON TE MANN.ME Cr THE MICE STORAGE O'HAZARDOUS WASTE FLEE STORAGE CR MELNO ROTATES TIE RYMER War.Of EN ALL SIRS SHOAL MET L smcon To RE mammasO A s IESHALL E ALLOWED ON RTE Rn00 ww mK.d HNMa. R) AN 90E0 VE NEI=MVO MORN.EM EldEIGH AND TEM. 17.lT OF STOCKPILES NOT TO ECOID T FEET. REMONS• AN 5) NOE PRN.TPA.DE FE1O FARC 5MLL E D.9OW4L M A 0080005 ROIL 10 RE IDIOTS OF 1E 16 ALL HYDRUSEDING ON PORT PROPERTY SIAL CONFORM TO PONT IMAM WARM DELTA s� BREMER TO MO USE ED 004 ODER Ma E ARIOED MORS ADIOS NE mom"YA'5005 94.11.E NITWRN 9{CIFlGTIONi alms urz A) 5*001 FEMME SELL E WELTED N MEEMI/COIR t1R MEDM113.0 AFTER EA01 PAENL NO A LEAST ONLY LURK PMdcED MM. ANY EOEED REPAIRS.EIDG100 ON FONIM6 ROLL E ARAE eILEDMRY. T) ANO TAE SISAL 9p10R E 0MOSED N MOA MAR CENTS DMI 1/5 TE EIGR Or DE SFUWOR TEAS MD.F93210. SEDMDR 0FIAO E RENTED ON ROMEO)510 SLOPS Np DE 40800 10010 ETYEEO ME E-ESAEL9ED M MIMED 9NET 119E: EROSION AND SEDWBff CONTROL • NOTES AND DETALS • MANN FM EE DO 0E009 9, SHEET: • C5.1 • 10 00. 2130043.15 UTE DEVELOPMENT W: 6-3-14 1111115 IIIIIII I♦ IM I I I I I I I LEGEND E4011401iEE FNENTCRY TABLE . STYB01. TYPE 511801. TEE, NAME 091 GVIOPY SON IE%TAE g iOI mI R16 (SF,) MT�ii1/06 MII10 EICISTNO BEE DORM 1 10 MANN ■ {�//�ECSINO 1TEE CAIID'Y TREES TO ON 611 M0 V me PROTECTION rsurnc McNtsaur•Interiors II I EODSINO CANOPY AREA PSIENTII E01 (2)COSMO A91 ro IOM9 4' 110 SF.. aRl4 uo 3 3 •�� AL3 N1TN r1EF 6001101604040401 FAOI TREE PROTCIAW FEA'CWo `, fl®10 B FOAMEDE 1031CRED EXISTING TREE TO E ROOM x OSS 114 TO yams ON fr." 9 ro SAM TAX LOT 300 EDS I MULTI-g� EEE + DESTILIND No17EO4 EBSTNC A CLi'l'l11LTI_STEN1 CLAMO 1s _. AIB Y x1a uAS9NY AMLa. 4 " , ' --::.:: EDS EBSTPO BC LEAE NO z z MACKENZIE. j ;`�/ •"-51191 .,� _ �' \� LOCATED nn o 90 MO / .� :::.41 i '-/i __-• li Eo. IMEXISTAR.TI HE MMES r 35 SP. OPEN No z z YAI CCM A,, EACN 900 UST MN MEET f . 6 'I�' �`I'Iy'��/i� — 3333 , - 1 / ..I::: _ i, E➢8 READS,PRUNED sate no l / V /' / f �/ EDS COSMO CLOSE 991 POST a• 80 ss. OPEN No 1 1 VAICCWER WA INP LOCATED ��� �' _� A ( / 1. ^�jo .Elo EIOSTIIO CRABAPPLE a• IW S.F. 9[EI No 3 2 / MULTI-STEM y 1 E7031110 OF - TE Tiff BRAND M IPM31 ONY TABLE l J rd J I1....2..i.',', 1 PROPERTY ISE 51181E TREE STAN0 1 MORON SNICKS ESTIMATED AIFAAGE 04 9TE CANON IITARITY // r/ '.,�- I q 0— ' •".. //I/ �7�/A� AIERAGE 091 RAMS NEA OF STNS 'Piegl+rAnal !, ;// i \ r�1/ is [/ /J 1 RD ALDER E-4' MT 33 341.3 SF. 3 ��'� /r h\ EXB'r O DING I •..N +II 'D EWING SO ERICEA0 SNB PWU 3 331.5 S.F. 3 // / MINE ABLE ; ! FEE DQBWR :: I S'ECER f N /r SII /% // .//€ f� J SERA z-s• 3 MS SF. 3 '7` // ' •, i. _2.1' '�� ._... 3333.__ AT AT SHADY /f /�. 3333.. 3333..._..__.._ _ ' 1 I' PMI! 0• SF. LAZE 3 31.5E 3 (— PSE TOTAL a3 511E 11364 SE / 40, /; ce : .__, is ONO/ LB! * g :: ,,,,:. FIH II trolEB Or JUNO MANX OR .4V E 1.DE TREE PI®rvATNM NO ROME SIT RAN MEETS ALL OF TE 1EOIBOOITS S1 1,- mi./ L TIE�TREE PART t E e IRE URBAN FORESTRY MAMA,SITE PLAN MEETS ALL OF DE 06010 NT3 9 SECTION fa PMT 2 I I l V IS .1 . OF NE URBAN FORESTRY 05044. I. a TIE 9RRREMTAL REPORT TABLES WET All 6 THE REMI9EIEl/i$N SECTION la PMT 3 1_ssl`-ssl x ANO NERIDIE WBS MEAN NE LOCAIEO ON DOS 91E lli .. OF TIE 1111BNI FORESTRY NAVAL S NO NEAITAE TI®ARE ON SITE `EFO R_ I;EIii li P I_ SEE 0YL PLANS ■■ 2 ; WEE PROIEY1TCN LEA[e11ER I■ .I SEE 0NL PLANS POR SSE I I UNLESS moms DOICAT8 FOR REMOVAL ALL TEES SMALL RECEIVE PROTECTIVE LEAS-ORES FOR `� lI ll/' sEO9IA1B1I SIV Ta1TNR0 FORA iU UTO OURATM0 N 11E PROJELT M AOAONIO:MIM TIE CTT N 1M:MD EOUIESIIDI¢ O...11=4. I TAX LOT 300 5'I00R MMIW METAL SZED IRON PO FENmRa wAL r ou TNN SMALL [I O 1 ■■ Iill . ffill TIP. 1 A NTARE FENCING CKYAM®RPL ELY S SHALE NATE A...&,....-76,,,...a.EEASIRAM.MO 9X31 8E NE NE MIMI ii i ■■ : YAWTAOED.FFNCNO 91.511 COMPLETELY SURROUND TE TEE AS SLIM d RAIL RU�� ?I 11 Man IMMO. itl ! 11 :■ !I NO ACTIVITY MAY IN waIIOTID TONS ANT W9mmo TIES PROTECTED AREA INCLUDING BUT Rmn m�.1W 1mW ■ PARKING AREA (` "' Nm LWIIED TO MINCING EO1iNF11T PLAttp'SLANTS srO19f0 MAtvDNs Ara 5101 WP09Ts ■■ . I ,� aNRPWo u1PAE1E walr.ae o15rn Leas ae Mry ENuvATwlR OR maACTlal1 Ra9c REv19aI= I I. S PROPOSED s RIDEMALE . is( { �0�TEC1OT al No MEETS 9ML1 E ATTAINED To NOV TREE DESIGNATED To BE RETAINED =III. CAUSED . ,( (/-- promA. ��/ `fU MULCH CEDER To WORN.PEPSI CDC PLY1g0a STI 0.EN SWUM MATERIAL REQUIRED AT f( �////, _.l I!Di, !I BY REAS AMMO HEAVY I COORDINATETTE�AL4]F]TEDTS:el AREAS TS AND LOCATION TION ECT M N ALM SGPE FRCS OIRWRECT. E) I�l a. PROTECNON FENCE SMALL BE MAINTAINED M RACE SOL REMOVAL IS NIIICRL®BY CITY OR ii I;s' .I UNTIL A FOUL CERTEICATE OF 00E PAM. IS ISMER /;' TREE PROF / F_ ... .�:L. L. I PROTECTIOI NOTES// �� 4 .y1it; TEMPORARY FENCE SEEL E E W 1ElWT.5EF M/ao. ICE ,,,yi , ! /<A�A�.4 - _ �0 �• _ .�T �iw SOIL Acn �9nAum TILE RroTEcrla PENOPO PPoo1e To 9FmN L.J Ni ! E k'<ill ` /~ E TO GALVANIZED POSTS. OF MEIN COI 1044CM MOM SECURED SIV FENCE SIN/REMAIN W RAGE WITS TIE MORMON 6 06055. TION TFEEMATION D BaAL I y\ .. •. 3333 - w r� _ el'_._ AT AL OF FENCE REMISES APPROVAL BY CITYS BRE PLAN ALITHCREED ... ECSIOIO SCflYNX TO IIEEIAII 3333 �.—..— .", G SECTION 1 TUT TRIS SITE PINI MEETS T NL U TBE ERESTRY A IN U L I'F_ 5011510 10 PART I CF TIE CITY of TCMC RNBAN 1045101 MANUAL I .__•--r.,_.� _..1... ....,..._..---.. EE ___3333._---..._�__ .._.._a-3333....._3333...__ ....k__._._._<__..._ 3333.._.__3333.__. DRAIN BC RW/PID 'I i, S.W.SHADY LANE 1 01 OW RMS FOR mE UTILITY WOW ATRW I NONAID A 1RELE11 I •- .•. I 5¢T BTI RAM WCSORPE AROEIECT MAam a �=;.-,_:-._.—-.. ._....._.. h E' 1515 SE MATER ALE./100 3333.—_—... """:z.-.wcry ! ( PaN11A4-9L STEW 3333...__._'_................-._.._....._.....__�_ 3 333._.__ ...........____............__f_. '` m OTEE PRESERVATION AND REMOVAL PLAN ',at 1� RJOB M0. 2130043.15 TE DEVELOPA1BdT REVEWI 6-3-14 111111 NM NS IMII 111 IIII 1 1 I 1 l 1 1 I PLANT I ATHML BCIEDILE TREE/ BOTANIC.. FslSHIMOC C - NI R 1201 (t)0001000 A91 TREES TO AS MOM E PRS111ED TREES - 60320405,3 / ,/�� ' 4 007 RA A91 A 9AYNIm' At S OLT0 •I206 M /1 TAX LOT 300 / / oostlNo THEE$AND O YIAM pA� ' �, SIM MS TO REMAIN ROIREIMF ` ' J SE f/-SNN �N/. OBLIIIIO OANANO E mai YA9aM WA. O ODUE AD SswamUNSET YM T. Ar.4 9 inianallase� :::. _: MACKENZIE. l %: . ...._ - ._. . ..ma.._. .. :.,.') aRCMRIY�.LVONaEI ra CAL W oaeaCOWee COW aunt;no 7A _ I C__.I_.. ... J! 1 c✓ ; Panus smwu•.m,wooAtw• Y CAL NB � Ry • j I iVAlE3 STA, awlY AS 9p./ p Q46. 'l ` I ',TREE CANOPY ,..� EX131�'1(� �� \\ I'// V EASING TREE EMORY TOREM S CN�1 // // J x♦EE�tD T IEE TR CANOPY AT W3TIAITY /'/' I ^5'� I / i i' / r` � EME TIS CANOPY COVERAGE // /' 3 ,6 // /'/ ; "� `r 1- '` P m ••••• TOTAL s1E ATEA 143F5 s (.w AC) Prapet II ' �" > ; �: COSTING TREE CANOPY MENAGE 150 SF (01 AC) IN FETAL j/ /// $`L ��. ""'.-'',,;0.‘ PROPOSED NEW TREE WEPT COVERAGE 7,BLIA s (.1I AC)4476 AT SHADY /: ,l �1. 4 a� _`\\f/>I p�®®®®®®� ... 1 I I TOTAL SHE TREE CANOPY CNQAGE: 405/s GI,AC)NAN LATE j +t . '• &.....' `%/1-Aim•• ■■ 1 ,1 ... --_--. n.4!rs a1EA100 TIM TIE YNOIIM 1212 TOTAL 0*11 HNC fIFECTE TREE CANOPY MORN elaDYLAIE / MAR:i.CR % • �1 ��i• V 191u FOR/E GERM.OEVELORENT SITE nvnac arY rcauRlOna ME YET. 4 111.M1111111•111111 g '' X4.1• 1 N 1- H — ;i '''�` ,' � ' at /�,/� -'� .Y`._eii ,� ] ,, ADI® / .. x �„p* V \•/ -. ,' 1i1 ,-------------c — ._-' 1.TE TREE PRESERVATd AND R x9112 RAN MFE1S A.OE TE TE REQORREIT9 / $ RR£ Y — ♦ I I (^ N 4CTd 14 PANT 1 OE TE OMAN El]I611tY YNNM. 1/ ,,CO3-qt,''444 �y limp I 2 M TE[CAMPY A2 PLAN BEETS M.6 1K RE7MOO1I5 N MOOS 10 PMT 2 r / i 'iN`� ��a mm OF TIE URBAN FORESTRY NAIR/AL a TIE awt omo.REPORT TABLES MEET A.OF TE IEOOIEAERTS N SECT/04 14 PAT S 5.,S"" �` ' �' 'Yi'e:�sC1� k 1 !: s TE OMNI FORESTRY MANUAL ; v, ® .■� ' A NO SOMME LAOS MEAS ARE LOCATED ON)OS SNE '1 "\ �D �/ _ 4 Mo.MTA E TRS ARE a SHE. _� " rr 4 PAFIICNQ AREA I �: 80L CFWNCI@BI1C8 ., / .�ITN x itli S ; n 0( TAX LOT 300 NEW TR DOSTIIO SOLS II RESE MEAS WE BEEN RECENTLY DISTURBED ARM 0 r RF E?a AR E CANOPY COPACIID.TOPSOIL 00ES NOT ATEA TO E PRESENT.IT1I0N TIER �' •o �I AEA4 EDSIIIO 908.4 AEI.a sAAnm Ao AAYdD AND TE41m ro 5013•36 Ne NE 1101,0111.113 NASI Musa �`,,o-,,t, 't .� 66 REINPOITT E ASmITA00 PFRCEI1TAa OP MIROON,PMOSIIORUS PoTASM wisr SALT, �■ .}"`"' '" ONMOI'YATIFA,AMO PI VANE TE COIIAACTON R REOVIE0 i0 USE g �"'� I TE TEST 89415 N OEIE1401110 NM IAOYL/IC RE PROPpI RALNPLE 94800011 TRAM ria / o" a SE CML PLANS FON : 4 I OF SOIL AIpN1OR9 AM Rm1uRER5 ro aul0 TIE 50IL Aro TIE MOAN. aaaP art gp y ! V' "c�, - RVOsn 0 w : �''.I I { EB�TI�MCAA M 02408E BETWEEN 4f Amain T0, 9E�SOO *410i , } � �j rk `` P N \ Z I!�(f n20ITT U R 111M1 3/0 E101 MD ER oP 01000 u9 YATOaNs KARMA.TO / k 11 • ,t �� N V./b4itAn! $ \� I �f .I 1812 fMNPY ire �F . I - 1 , g' % ) A /• r 7 .,,-- Finifteliii„,.,10.:k 4f,t" ', r 9�v .. . .-- SHEET TITLE �` A :� � ( 1E FCANOPY LEA j �c"�5...�;. EASTNC SRWALO 0RERAANI.ATTEST THAT T .30.NATURE TREE CANOPY I. .........—.. 5EL1IOR IS PAT IO' E CRY WARD WEAN FORESTRY YANUAL 1 . DRAM We 801/14, RONALD S W.SHADY LME € HEIDEN LANDSCA E ARCHITECT0120®BM RA I ISIS SE WATER ANE.000 1: PODIUM OR, 97203- SE CML PLOPS FO9112 :IUTRITY IFON1AMN 90-15{-0600y . __.. ..._ _ RENOIBLIL0�001. j1 TFIEE CANOPY SITE PLAN i a Tar 1p Jos rm. 213034315i15 SCALE Y.10 ME DEVELOPIEBTIf REVIEW 6-3-14 MS N N NM M — — MI I OM E — — M 1111111 I !•{ 1 ■11 I I t PLANT 0167901ESCHEME 17CE CANOPY TAaE SHAKE 110TAMM.V.NEVE- �// NEE/ SPECIES OPO 902 101 CSOILS.) TOTAL TOTAL FOR *IMAM 1 OF GRID* AREA MER COMM MAIC SPAr1IC KOBE(CF.) MUNE(C.F.) SGL 7.5't POI MATURE 0301 1601010 AMMO LOT SLIAE r.1.FLOE CANOPY LOT ■ TREES an IED SUNSET 1.51 0 1.001 -- AO'MEM 6; 311 SF. 1164E (1.25 SF.) 6411.0401.1.1001101E ALFA ROOKIE'RED 911NSET' Y CAL.BM 001 IED soot 220 >y 1.023 -- Eo'SPREAD MN EE2 or. Pinning•E112100020.11 PED 9NRET MAPLE AS STORM WILE 0.206 SF.) 003 REV SUNSET 2,632 0 2.632 — Io'SPREAD 6.S 606 SF. YAPIE (1.25 Si) A`' A FRAMES OS157O4 RAYIo00' 2'CAL B6B DM IED!MET 3020 0 1010 -- 10'SALEM&Th 1.f SF. 503.1.115,0 INbKA ?� i ` /1) MY11000691 AS!10011 PARE -- MON SE) MS=T!MO •/1, a�T n _ �EOSTM TREES MO Ooh E zoo 0 MI5 STs ]e6 SJ. Yw { r -/ '^1B$T01E""°' TAX LOT 300 r" '�% ` '� •• � 9RIDMc olEwlAMc e'NM MASONRY IOU Das RED�SUNSET 211 no Roos -- ��es OA Sr. �Aa 70107010 j _- ... MACKENZIE. - !'. { ::;.. .. _.. WT RA1K100 691 2.00 0 1..010 600 CF. BY SPREAD— — ��..�� r - _. .... _ SF - COO ,0. i .. ..::_. .: .... _: }, 006 MYATo0 MN TIO 0 n0 AGC CF. _ — IIA,I .a1.8If ow. 6 FT., .. ..... ./' ((00 Sr..) fllff! WE KO i' (... IA ' / /-J _. _... E01 MEW ASH %MO 0 2.00 __ __ — — WA A1.0D a � _ g� it _" E02 DOSING A91 w 0 — ' i • YATIVEQUALIETING 1123 SF i `3, i ",, 11 AREA �c Yui,' "M. EXISTING p<� I \ I . r/%i r/,.'/ / g ./' r/r £::„, E All-E---_ 1 7 � 1 4 , // // ' '+b / // %r : �_ IIONo11AL MATURE TREE CANOPY WIDE nem_ • • • .\\'71,11111111111111111 py 1 7/%//'// / / ,r/r i 4?i) \ IJIhhl t _._ 6V1 9011Q1tE CMlOP1/,/__-----71. ) ■1. E.4TOMEI' %% , o ■-■■11■■ f I .I E 3 WEIED 604,ARAE / O�/ . 1 ��I� I.\'.�♦r♦ vi 1 AMONG LOT NEA IMTS 'l ',D �� \•/,L I SIG (I Migq LOT 7!ff CANOPY COVERAGE DATA 4 - -*-•.a ® I..,, t I AMMO LOT AREA: 4K1 SF. TOTAL QUALIFYING MATURE TRE CANOPY AREA: 1223 SF. '' ',/ /�/,f2I - 1'■ L . PROPERTY 9 CARO,COKA PROVIDER 60.3E y 10 ', PARKING AREA ua uMRw1 I CANar COYER MOUSER MR 9 6621 n GREATER TALAR THE MEMO OF]OR TOTAL QUNlT2Ia MEM CAMPY COKR ' If" TrETv6RE CRY PETNIEIVITS NE EER. 1 tA y TPAREOolDTTIFF TAX LOT 300 0NOTE 0160 ;OT;�Iar�rm A YpA°640 otT 1 W0 aKTN MTRE m1.aF T1cAwo•u E N ARAt O 4ti� 3 -- . 33® AO Q F ( ( MAYP o.1 RN D m1. I 'fin P690I0 LOT TRE 04TSa6 )�ARA " \ _'w., NEI.TYP. f,( i T�SOL%{.W B avMPYrt1 \E.iEVISIMS ' .R. F - PAI60I0 LOT TRE 11MMW 00I.WI.URE PEOIRRIENT(CF.PO TEE) 1.000 CF. �/ 9'3s •vsre tt STREET TRE MORN 602.252.2•12 RELIFILMT(CF.PER TRU IW Cr. �(nI - \aei/• i/ , �S .•/R,, s. �� ` _i t II NOTES ,\ '�, �/ A22 L► ' \� / 1.TK TREE PRESERVATION Gro REI10YAL SITE IRAN MEETS NL of THE TIE REOREEJOIR az ♦ 4 M SERI 16 PART 1 OF TE OI®AN POIESTRY MA'AM-i/li �t / I, - 1• • f z 11E TREE CANOPY 41E 4AN RETS ALL OF TE RWFEIETTS M 000011 l6 PMT 2 i 7 ,��I ' _ �� a TRE veM ILESTRr 11AMUAL// 3 TIE 9F4ENENTAL REPORT TARES WIT ALL OF TE IEQUIEMOITS M SECTION 10.PMT 3 6 {{� ''..:3(/ wz• F, a J r ,•�.%Y� Tai k .I„..,-.S.-..,7- -(. � Q THE URBAN FORESTRY 1.60116E �.� _ BEET ITIIE) s R//, 0 3 , O SEE OPEN FO LOK1m MA Aro ROOT PATH aETA6s eA130.rlU.o No 6/366 -s- _ . .. _ _ , . PARKNO LOT AND!TWEET MEE BOL VOLUMErCANOPY AND PLAN i —~ �•. "'. ... '—.”- E ATTEST THAT 016 912 RAM 12£10 ALL 6 TE RELR01oOT5 M SWIM 72.PART]Ab 6.7!1 � . �, � . -- ---" -- _-- ._� � SECTION 11 Pr]OF E CITY TD URBAN FORESTRYMNRW FORESTRY _ ._....__...�.,...�_ .,.._......._.._-.......... _..._.........._..s—......... k' `,o'MATURE TRE •,C SKEET TEE R;S RONALD A WEEP \y ..•L. SW.SHADY LNC ',sem, / I STREET TREE mvN ,( '4*'R' .T 040000 6'E RM S'NATURE NEE SOL 0.�• ( mMS S LINTER ME 041* SHEET: ",..••. 3 �....__.._ L2.2 EE CANOPY Aro SOL VOLUME PLAN " P...I las TF SGYE I.-II "".1 2130043 ME DEVELOPMENT IEVEW 6-3-14 ' 11111 111111 i N EN GM 1 1 MI RN MN a a MO IIIIIII IIIIII 11.11. ale MIR I PLANT MA1 130EDULE M III COMM NNE MC Architecture•Intolon PlmnI1Y•ENW--D1C .:C `:I O AZ WORM WAS SAINT r CAL NB ( i REO W SLWOR YAPIE AS CPL. PwIMnACe LW4LSRO IlwwwwwnSW ,...t...4......._/1! \ ]sJNS)t!f �- oesrRc O Aro C3IaxmwmSw rvwwr r CM.e4a axwsi i "M'ro RE''''' TAX LOT 300 Lz 9'TaEM'STANDAID IGT4RA TIES AS safes i:, % IMAM OKAIAYC !•HIGH MASONRY WALL• M Wlff COSTING ..:::-....� ACKENZIE '`.._,. . _ .. ... ream O A RAIVOW• AS sLRB �........... e f�MfOA'S oxlCAm A GAL BAB Cant s!s0691#44 .� x ASA.1. =WeerlM MEET .,• 1/1112 DV ERIK rp:};. 0FAITHS SERUATA•AYMaCARA• r CM.711 WOCeaR WA NSW A O Jp awArlE4:nnfeTmlc Donn As CAL. .O F O r O. O � pr0� OOp�x%SOTT/ // i111111r :: !) O�;IBr rOp�.xp•0 P1 aFITT E.c �v ammo RR 4G 00 %xiicoO //. .. , ease �%� ...,:.;/ LS$OEIIIRG SfMOAIa �\� O� %Yx%!f�/ EX�* �� ta. O Y AS MULTI-STEN I 11� i� • �, %%%fiO�, /..,faigliliii,• . AZIRO TR AL11i A b1flOMe J tcCWf /, %', , DFiVE AIBIF O.C� /' �' mama. O+ aarezza"arl� CLL mrt. // /7 %/�/ ''Air„/•'/ _````q.._.`[� -\� ,./ ..,. O° °woi nw.nR us q{.c"c Pree.r / . .� yO.O'y`, _._ • .`-/'4 ,i r'. .. ..�. t) CO�I�fR-IG 0":1.NH NOLLT 'C 6GCa'r FETAL % %"%% 74■■■■■■■■■i® 3' E SHADY +t7A% O � \sem — P .�X1nATE s eGaT LAIE ,•,,` .%%j4,4165$7014N 111.■■■■■■■■■ p °°`� ' ,��� y � r%o ,V°o° y�ay�° \Vi►��■�■�■�■,�'�Q ` _ f OIOUOf:0Y91 SHADYWIN TIN� L/IIE g •0,5 • ..1W— 4:r , ooa�40 f SIVA F ` l� �R �� ►, / —'i-- �h�Fl•o !! ZA1 , �a,,. //'/ ,411;/ .ape pi� �� �� ��' Nrj i ........._Alt I .�' kw r is CONT. ispa /fir` �����` ® I L au,'AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SISTER TO GE MULLED TO ,,:-44* I '■._D� 'i .. YAwTAW ALL IA'orJPE MATERIAL. '$ / \I, t PARKING AREA + `., S. PROVIDE 1/!Del MUCK MIK WWI AT A anN 6 S .: v ',A ; VCRs nwalslCOr NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS .... / 4::y\ a LOG1f0111 OESr-o TARS 9MAU.BE 541ITD N TIE EESD er nc ewmAcrm New ro DGLAIErImeHr 6 fID1eL 0 A.ir'Jae \���i ill .f I TAX LOT 300 A AcnlcARc PAL indslm ,owINSTs��I TO *a^""�- *'^-N'^ '! 1 11,KIM �•�Q a ALL PUNT YAIFIDAL 9WL GE KALIIO xua4;Rv sTDOL-EL "0,▪7=al�•' `��l. ._ I (ilt BRAM.A'a Noone TIAL EOIASE ITer AROY I SECS "`Is ` DOO`\ srCMGPIAN9 ICON iOLAR VI4w ! 0 e�w WS SP WED vI STOOKINJURIES PAO DEFECTS=rimO' IOW —92.1.2.51 t 4 TRIANGLE TIP. : NfR'4AY 9TOOt,AN9 z'NLI-SWI.I' `„ ATia ALL ECSfRC TREES PINKS.MID ROOTS 44VL GE PROTECTED • COGEN MIR , �`V �, ,`_- I i / I IRON DAMAGE TTNB AIS CONSTRUCTION PREPARATIOA REMOVAL F i. ;� ,`l� /�� .�� / C{a` \IN \\\ f (I ;Rii`A'lATlw ACfMfES KIM Aro ADJACENT TO PROEM' " -,-_,..:::44,...yp ESRC e j1i .; I Ili : o • ,Lacs ro 4• ►l;........„,..,,,„„ i :,, .7 }Ora�rO N .�,�� ,� .0-.. a�,.'s -... u���.7 I OL SHEET TITLE: ._ ct- OO,OTY000OOOOOOOOA00k60'A041 Ofi.00�0 0'O'O' / 04140100' `1"E" At\\ e �a�e� hktie�tii\�S��\e+>+�+ �a 1�ti+51+��. �� ������ i � � 19. ll et { t r E PLAN ISI ` 1 . 1 CUR IMI A, L1,,,,,,,,,.,,c STAIONO .—...—..._.. :: :.:.:-- ' • T JM 1 I .., EDSTRC SDflNNX TO REMAIN y 1 S W.SHADY LADE ! ._. : ...._.. .._... ...- RA- m RAN • y' Na/ro • o[GL® i 9331: ' • •` SEE OVA PAWS res STE 77.72'.7:.';'a.'..±..•...--....--. 1... Ull1rY MaY.STIw L2.3 t r 2p00 \i LANDSCAPE PLAN �9 SCMC '-td " 0-"-":—'—:1-9,5:— IACO 32E004115 TE DEVELOPLENT REVIEW, 6-3-14 MI OM M M - - - 1 OM i - MI MS - - - - - - M . r AN0401 POSTS 2.STEEL U 0010111—EMINATLNOV( .,.=SE ropffTAQEDANCHOR MOS .C NEM.. ( Engineering TREE>E I VN r-0•Q0.NBL SET CROWN Cr RDDTBNL Y BOK FLESH DRONE •� • • DISTANCE FROM EDGE R 1n TIE sOED 0.0 SPAOIG NO FORM WRAP NO ROW h.YM1a ... TML FRLN TOP IN1F �� POSTS E RODTBNL •.►•a 111111 TR-SPACE AT SPECIFIED ao9103 �'ASW mtl z•DIA X r NDOD STATE jR. w..�F' • EGV ISTANT- _ KEEP OEM o•RODTLNLL ... E P iAt `r Y MULCH /•. PLANT mITFn LETnfYt = 1� Yr rADW E ROOTB.IMLe _ `I`/ MEN MADE • wMLlmwmWIr AeoNFBBWICONEYBy,�q,B :4 _A:F MACKENZIE. AIOREANREB1Ai/PAND WINECALVAMIID .-,,SS. �)r :. Y MAOI __.__MAE BASETS FROM TOP DPE LBN iFA,ilJfA TAMEl3II � .••y • NNi OF BOOTBALL �������_I�I I��� I W �� ZZ ZZ Iw:II' ... e n n u i 111111 I u 11 n WI DEVELOPMENT COW. Y MiIM �� �� �I II -11=1,-11=11 ® ROOT9Nl Doo NWT•M.aWI 11 �I[11.'_ 'D D i ii n l �zii 4§.5=1 PEANTNG SOL . aunt loo HZIa !! II FARM ORAE ��������I��I��I�d///////////// .0 n������n��l MOOED SOL vwcaAe�wA�wo II ,_I�i1111 , LETN FORE Ma TREE PBoncnO DEVICE OAT. 'OpOI�II�11��11��11 11��1111R��011RII11110 Wil I1=1 MOSSIER TABLETS BO NDARES OF PROTECTION AREA WILL E ESTABLISHED N RE FEW COMPACT A AI MO SOL II. i////////////// ll' PRIOR TD LRNSTRUCTIO L 'll II II II'=11 II 11-1f NAME SOL I=11-.II—II-11-11r-II-i. PLANTING SOL 3)BUMDARES OF PROTECTION AREA WOOD E STARED NO CLAWED 2.Rx1TLN1 NATIVE SOL 11 R 71 11=11 11.11.11=u PRIOR TO INSTALLIIO EVES — —_ — COMPACT PLANTING SOL 4)AIM PANNE TO CRITICAL ROOT EOE m NOT DAYNE OR SEVER LARGE i4 NATIVE SOL ROOTS MEN RRTALLMG POSTS. 0)ENE SHOULD E NANTAN D 1147010101r CONSTRICTION u a a ©TREE PLANTING—DOUBLE STAKE ©TREE PROTECTION FENCE t 3 CONTAINER/B+B SHRUB PLANTING i 4 OUrDCOVER PLANTING 9 SCARE'MIS NTS 0440•NTS SCALE NTS Prep FETAL EDGE E SIIIRAVOICAROCOSER AT SHADY 0100 AREA/WALL COLE O SD OPEN WC VOLUME ,1q� LAS •411111*- • DISTANCE THE SPEEDGECIFIED CC OPEN 901E VOI.UM VARN -MONO LOT SISEA0�NG OR as 6MCI LANE • ' SPACTIO OUR W •ARMING LOT SURFACING Ta <. IY l�ROR �� y �/ / '^COVEREO SOL VOLUME TM-SPACE AT SPEWED t{ VIP{I; ;� _ PER CITY SPECIFNMTONS •�• •= 0.0 DISTANCE- .T tl l.J. *4--COMPACTED 9UBGRADE yLyT,. itr. • ACTED SR(NLAOE .4 .1111.. • EIRODISTANT RANT CODER ',Tr:-47411,,,,g. -• .'� ' ` - fOAAIPUOE r RANINE • PROFILE Tei PROFILE ®a SHRUB/GROUNDCOVER SPACINGp ©PARKING LOT TREE WITH OPEN SOLI ®i PARKING LOT TREE WITH COVERED IL SOonali MN mow PEANISSION1MXINCIL NO AeM:,�A VIE 1.10,1311/ NM in IF MD if Scut NTS NTS MIS RENWOR 1 kr. ma • SHEET TIRE LIME Mo LMOBCAPE DETALs DRAWN BM.TW) OEOOD IED RAN WELT: L8.0 a°Na 213004a16 ifTE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 6-3-14 I \\,,,,, \ 'N — I\N A— IV ti 1 N \ N I F a.f41 II 'r - y _� , ; g \ i ,, . ��\ as 6 \ .! 1r i i X71 `Q0'� '\ \\�\ \_ °4:i 41;24%.1::i.:\ . 1' . 1 12 / ,y1 1 Hg \) i '41 p /III' 1 '' I'" - u,--,,----.-1 i _,,..,„ ; , 1 ,_....., ,, 1 , \\.\\ A,,__, -ir-t- ' ..,• -1-- • -I -1 1 -----lig iill Iii " Z. ,,1. . €. i Y 1 1.., It /.ti_ r I I I II 11 i {r �� E s I I 1 1 I1 ; " k ' r I � •I 1 F. --- 1 Q 1 a a I I � -- II 1 t r I 11 a 1 a1 r�IQI-� 4 2 ^I a 1 II Z lg • IIrI I 1 I I i 1 I HI I I 1 111 : iiiiiitilill iffi9mp1 i Aid AAAA 1 A' gig■! 1 4i I iiiii 1111111 } 4 � m M 1 I I I i I ! v.e..,ann0 A1X`x i'' 1 f I 11H 111111iiiiiii 11111,1;11 Iiiii '11 a e ! t ° 11111E1 0°11 ;:! 1;:! l'Y 1;i! ;,11! 1;4! aii��i IIIe I It' ell ! tot ! t! 1 ..511>,1. hi 1 111111 RY Irr A�= aI. Ag9 A € i 41 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LOCATED IN,"E NORTHEAST N ORTHWEST I o ill !lir ONE-g1M7ER OF SEC110N.)5, I�,, iiia NW MI.RICE,silt 2090 1'4 s TOY*I P I SOUTH,MANCE 1 PEST, ~�wr.(wa)84ie�2i27 FAX 1-217 ! W.Y.,CITY OF TIGARD, 2L��,�,� � g ic I W s x 11 TIGARD, OREGON WASHINGTON COUNTY,ptEGON f S �1RVEYING, INC. I IIIIII M I _ _ II I I 1 III I I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 422.4. EAST,BPSLIC ..T4cP. 17-3.1. -----'''..,,,,c,, 12TAL PANEL. Lq_4L‘A' ' METAL WALL A°'r L - :' iiIU arta .., J _� .. .:: ,!..,.., .• .1 ••••........... DAM..�� VOW.SOP. ❑ TED❑ LLLL� �❑AICLEAJNILAINTI ❑ ❑141.21.1 SAAN (P.1.1 EXCZED IfT•LP WALL west elevation south elevation a' ONEIMEN^ :::Datini SON. �w-r. emm ruuA. wm.O- 4"r. w [ '1 .1 1' 1 1 1 rl : .1 1 1:: 1 : ' 91111"71 :..........:. 1: 1 : • : :1 ''` l' 1:1 : 1H1 : 11 i 11 1 1: i i . : i , , ,, , i . : ,, i . .. i ...: , .i• , •r : : : .. 1 . • .: • T''riltr . . . . „ . : . . : . .r .. • • . . . . • , . • . • . . . . . . . , ,. r .. . . , , . . • . •• p-juri .E - •••••------ ••••••••••••••••••• Ilia , , , : . : . : : , : . : :. : . .. .... east elevation north elevation finish schedule P-11°,... VIM.'YAK P-3 PANT I°MOE 4-1C-11..LO..TOPa.serf I Ala ISAAC-PIA•00-1 PATTIE. IP-•PANT MATO4 GANG 19•Pall.ALUM 6100006:NT ,PANT IS..0..E+0 ..RAIDA Tr.r s WAN GAD=.TANS.1•a"AK SWAN' retail @ shady lane elevations MAJ De VOLOPMONT CORPORATION TILANO/NCMMIDT ARG NITtGTN,PG Mil EN 11E1 i MB MN MO 11111 UN i■III 1 1 I 1 1 r WORK ROOM id two um n u 1 • l÷ t 41 EN I I o� . — , P . EP E ...,,,, # Iia �� ��/ � ' i.,, p retail @ shady lane floor plan MAJ DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TILAND/6C NMIDT ARCHITECT!,PC i• I — — M — II �� / EXIST&.ELD&. ■ Isw D e N\ 11.11....... r $,'iUii!i, I ILl! i 3, o la Ile 114 .., S I■ Sill SNADT LANE 0444 retail @ shady lane site plan MAJ D EVELOeMENT LORPO RATION TILANOI CI MIDT ARGNITEGTS,PG 'Fr liii •4 0 / /� I E%ICT'G. • 11 `"'"'''IE,.'Iv," 19 BLOC. ■ t ` i ' enclosure plan I 4.__ 4 I CY. `MUSH�� , .10.01.11.T.11 N WW 6:124r(117:1' II ......... m.m. > II BO Emmonmemmonnommommomme west elevation south elevation 8111 WADY LANE I I -a c site plan 044 east elevation north elevation finish schedule T•.i e,.Tn umr e,..I..w»..�T�.�n.T.c Ta TTonTe+Ic„Kex.rcR.eoae trash enclosure T•,T•,wT 15,COM,IC..,PAIRNISIS AM IbSTA*I CABOT STAINS w>sn.R..0TI retail @ shady lane trash/site plan MAJ DGV GLO rMGNT GO RPO RATION TILAND/SCHMIDT ARGNITGGTb,PG Clean Water Services File Number CleanWater Services 14-000994 Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment 1. Jurisdiction: Washington County City of Tigard 2. Property Information (example 1S234AB01400) 3. Owner Information Tax lot ID(s): Name: Stanley and Audene Nored 1S135BD00200 Company: Address: 511 NE 21st PI Site Address: 9785 SW Shady Ln City, State,Zip: Tigard,OR 97223-5434 City, State,Zip: Tigard,OR,97223 Phone/Fax: Nearest Cross Street: Greenburg Road E-Mail: 4. Development Activity (check all that apply) 5. Applicant Information ❑ Addition to Single Family Residence(rooms,deck,garage) Name: Ryan Schera ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Minor Land Partition Company: Mackenzie U Residential Condominium ❑ Commercial Condominium Address: 1515 SE Water Ave U Residential Subdivision ❑ Commercial Subdivision IA Single Lot Commercial 01Multi Lot Commercial City, State,Zip: Portland,OR 97214 Other Phone/Fax: 503-224-9560 Redevelopment of gas station site into drive-thru E-Mail: rschera@mcknze.com 6. Will the project involve any off-site work? ❑Yes U No U Unknown Location and description of off-site work May include part of street dedication if not already completed 7. Additional comments or information that may be needed to understand your project This application does NOT replace Grading and Erosion Control Permits,Connection Permits,Building Permits,Site Development Permits,DEQ 1200-C Permit or other permits as issued by the Department of Environmental Quality,Department of State Lands andlor Department of the Army COE. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state,and federal law. By signing this form,the Owner or Owner's authorized agent or representative,acknowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services have authority to enter the project site at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering information related to the project site. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this document,and to the best of my knowledge and belief,this information is true,complete,and accurate. Print/Type Name Ryan Schera Print/Type Title Land Use Planner ONLINE SUBMITTAL Date 4/11/2014 FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY ❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200'of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. ❑ Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200'of the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20, Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,State,and federal law. 3 Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information the above referenced project will not significantly impact the existing or potentially sensitive area(s)found near the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect additional water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider letter as required by Resolution and Order 07-20,Section 3.02.1. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state and federal law. ❑ This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS approved site plan(s)are attached. ❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development or the lot was platted after 9/9/95 ORS 92.040(2). NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Reviewed by t:: 40 fj Date 04/16/14 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 • Phone:(503)681-5100 • Fax:(503)681-4439 • www.cleanwaterservices.org ' MACKENZIE . — DESIGN DRIVEN I CLIENT FOCUSED RETAIL AT SHADY LANE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS To City of Tigard,Oregon For MAJ Development Submitted June 4,2014 Project Number 2130389.06 - MACKENZIE Since 1960 RiverEast Center 11515 SE Water Ave,Suite 100,Portland,OR 97214 111 PO Box 14310,Portland,OR 97293 I T 503.224.9560 I www.mcknze.com M . -__ TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Project Description 1 Scope of the Report 1 Existing Conditions 2 Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities 2 Transit Facilities 2 Crash Analysis 3 II. Pre-Development 5 Planned Transportation Improvements 5 Pre-Development Traffic Volumes 5 III. Site Development 6 Access 6 Site Trip Generation 6 Site Trip Distribution 7 Post-Development 7 IV. Intersection Analysis 8 Operation Analysis Description 8 Operation Analysis 8 V. Queuing Analysis 10 VI. Summary 11 VII. Appendix 12 H:\Projects\233038906\WP\RPT-City of Tigard-Transportation Impact Malys s-140604.doa M . LIST OF TABLES Table 1 — Roadway Characteristics 2 Table 2 — Tri-Met Bus Transit Service 3 Table 3 — Intersection Crash Rates 3 Table 4 — Site Trip Generation 6 Table 5 — AM Intersection Operations 8 Table 6 — PM Intersection Operations 9 Table 7 — Weekday AM 95th Percentile Queuing (Feet) 10 Table 8 — Weekday PM 95th Percentile Queuing (Feet) 10 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 — Vicinity Map Figure 2 — Site Plan Figure 3 — Existing Lane Configuration and Traffic Control Figure 4 — Existing and Background Growth Traffic Volumes—AM and PM Peak Hour Figure 5 — In-Process and Pre-Development Traffic Volumes—AM and PM Peak Hour Figure 6 — Site Trips—AM and PM Peak Hour Figure 7 — Post-Development Traffic Volumes—AM and PM Peak Hour H:\Projects\2]3038906\WP\RPi-atyofTigard-Transportation Impact Analysis-140604.doa M . I. INTRODUCTION Project Description This Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) has been prepared to support the proposed redevelopment of an existing building at 9785 SW Shady Lane in Tigard, Oregon. The project consists of a small building expansion and addition of a drive-through lane for a coffee shop use.The building will be a total of 2076 SF. The site is located at the northeast corner of the SW Greenburg Road/SW Shady Lane intersection, and is described as Township 1 South, Range 1 West,Tax Lot 200, Section 35BD. The property is bounded by the parking for an adjacent medical office building and Highway 217 to the north, SW Shady Lane to the south, a medical office building to the east, and SW Greenburg Road to the west. A vicinity map showing the project location is presented in Figure 1. The site has access to the roadway network through an existing driveway on SW Shady Lane. This driveway is stop controlled and provides only a single exiting lane. A site plan is presented in the Figure 2. Scope of the Report The scope of this report has been reviewed with City of Tigard staff, including a trip generation assumption letter dated February 4, 2014, and subsequent conversations. The study area includes the following intersection and site access location: • SW Greenburg Road/SW Shady Lane • SW Shady Lane/Site Access For purposes of this analysis,the project is assumed to be completed in 2015,with the following analysis scenarios in both the AM and PM peak hour: • 2014 Existing Conditions • 2015 Pre-development Conditions • 2015 Post-development Conditions 1 H:\Projects\213038906\WP\RPT-aityofTigarc-Transportation ImpactMalysis-140604.doa M ■ II. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing Use The existing 2,035 SF building and outdoor display area is currently being used for sale of playground equipment.The site is zoned Mixed Use Commercial (MUC). Transportation Facilities The site access to Shady Lane is stop controlled. The Shady Lane approach to Greenburg Road is stop controlled. Currently, both intersections are full movement. Figure 3 presents existing lane configuration and traffic control for the study area intersections. While the Shady Lane approach to Greenburg Road is not striped for separate lanes, the wide lane effectively operates as a two lane approach, with approximately 50 feet available for vehicle queuing side by side. The figure reflects this condition and it is also included in the operation analysis. The following table summarizes the study area roadway characteristics. TABLE 1—ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS Roadway Functional Posted Travel Bike On-Street Side- Classification Speed Lanes Lanes Parking walks SW Shady Lane Neighborhood 25 2 Yes Yes Yes SW Greenburg Road Arterial 35 4 Yes No Yes Existing Traffic Volumes Traffic counts were conducted at the intersection of Greenburg Road with Shady Lane on Thursday, February 25th, 2014. Figure 4 presents weekday AM and PM peak hour existing traffic volumes. The AM system peak hour was found to be 7:25-8:25 AM, and the PM peak hour is 4:40-5:40 PM. Copies of the intersection turning movement counts are provided in the Appendix. Traffic volumes at the site access on Shady Lane were estimated from the counts at Greenburg Road. Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities Sidewalks are currently provided along the entire site frontages of Greenburg Road and Shady Lane and throughout the study area, with the exception of sections along the south side of Shady Lane east of the site. Bike lanes are provided in both directions on SW Greenburg Road. SW Shady Lane is a neighborhood road, so no bike lanes are provided. Transit Facilities TriMet provides fixed-route and demand-response (dial-a-ride) transit service within the study area. Table 2 presents the details of the two bus routes serving the immediate study area. 2 H:\Projects\213038906\WP\RPTfiRyofTgard-TransportationImpact nalysis-14060.doa M M . TABLE 2—TRI-MET BUS TRANSIT SERVICE 78—Beaverton/Lake Attribute 76—Beaverton/Tualatin Oswego North Route Endpoint Beaverton Transit Center Beaverton Transit Center South Route Endpoint Tualatin Transit Center Lake Oswego Transit Center Weekdays: Weekdays: 5:42 AM—11:17 PM 5:32 AM—12:18 PM Service Day(s)and Times Saturday Saturday: 6:30 AM—10:20 PM 6:05 AM—11:27 PM Sunday: Sunday: 7:00 AM—8:30 PM 7:05 AM—10:27 PM Typical Headways 30 minutes 30 minutes SW Greenburg Road/SW SW Greenburg Road/SW Nearest Bus Stop Locations and Stop ID Cascade Avenue Cascade Avenue Numbers 223'1 2230 NB SB 2230 NB 2231 SB Crash Analysis When evaluating the relative safety of an intersection, consideration is given not only to the total number and types of crashes occurring, but also to the number of vehicles entering the intersection. This leads to the concept known as "crash rate," which is usually expressed in terms of the number of crashes occurring per one million vehicles entering the intersection (MEV). Intersections having a crash rate less than 1.0 crashes/MEV are considered relatively safe. At crash rates higher than 1.0 crashes/MEV, consideration may be given to correcting operational problems. Annual traffic entering the study area intersection was estimated by multiplying the average annual daily traffic (AADT) entering the intersection by 365.AADT was estimated by multiplying the intersection weekday PM peak hour total volume by a factor of ten, a typical method of estimating daily traffic. For comparison,the AADT for Greenburg Road south of Cascade Avenue was 21,700 in 2008. Crash data for the study area intersections were obtained from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit (CARU). Crash data for the City of ODOT study intersections include the most recent four years (January 2010 through December 2013) and is presented in the following table. Crash data and calculations are presented in the Appendix. TABLE 3—INTERSECTION CRASH RATES Number of Crashes Crash Intersection AAOT Rate per 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total (Est-) MEV SW Greenburg Road/SW Shady Lane 2 2 2 0 6 21,240 0.19 No crashes were reported at the driveway. The study area intersection has a crash rate less than 1.0 crashes/MEV. 3 H:\Projects\213038906\WP\RPT-CRy of Tigard-Transportation ImpaetAnalysis-140604.dooc M . Six crashes were reported during the four year time period at the intersection of SW Greenburg Road/ SW Shady Lane, and are described below: • Southbound, rear end crash occurred north of the intersection on July 22, 2011, during the day. It was caused by the second vehicle following too closely. _ ▪ Northbound, rear end crash occurred south of the intersection on December 15, 2012, during the day. It was caused by the second vehicle following too closely. ■ A left turning vehicle exiting the Frontage Road struck a south bound vehicle. This crash occurred on December 14, 2010, during the evening and was caused by not yielding to the vehicle having the right of way.There was also an obstruction for the left turning vehicle—likely a vehicle stopped in the near lane. _ ▪ A northbound side swipe crash occurred on November 23, 2011, at 8:00 AM in the center of the intersection.The crash occurred because there was an improper lane change. • A southbound vehicle struck a left turning vehicle exiting the Frontage Road.This crash occurred on May 17, 2010, during the day and was caused by not yielding to the vehicle having the right of way. • A southbound left turning vehicle struck a north bound vehicle. This crash occurred on December 10, 2012, during the evening and was caused by not yielding to the vehicle having the right of way. In summary,three of the six crashes are related to left turn movements—one southbound to eastbound (to Shady Lane) and two left turns from the Frontage Road with southbound vehicles. ' Sight Distance Analysis g Y ' Sight distances were reviewed at the site access to Shady Lane and intersection of Shady Lane with Greenburg Road in accordance with Tigard Development Code Section 18.705.030.H.1 and AASHTO recommendations. ' The sight distance recommendations from the driveway along Shady Lane are 240 feet for right turns and 280 feet for left turns, based on a speed of 25 mph. East from the driveway, sight distance is available for more than 300 feet. To the west, sight distance is available to the intersection with Greenburg Road, approximately 280 feet away. It should be noted that vehicles turning onto Shady Lane from Greenburg Road will be traveling less than 25 mph. Sight distance standards are met. Sight distance recommendations for the Shady Lane approach to Greenburg Road are 335 feet for right turns and 435 feet for left turns, based on a posted speed of 35 mph and a four lane roadway. Sight distance is available for more than 350 feet to the south, through the intersection with Cascade Avenue, meeting the right turn standards. Sight distance to the north is available for approximately 450 feet, through the Highway 217 ramp intersection, meeting the standard for left turns. tFor vehicles turning left southbound from Greenburg Road to Shady Lane, sight distance is available through the intersection with Cascade Avenue for more than 300 feet, exceeding the AASHTO's recommended 285 feet. ' H:\Projects\2]3038906�WP\RPT Gry ofTigard Transportation Impact Analys s-140004.doa 4 M • III. PRE-DEVELOPMENT Planned Transportation Improvements No planned public projects were identified in the study area that would affect the traffic volumes.At the Frontage Road approach to Greenburg Road, opposite Shady Lane, a partial median is proposed by an indoor skydiving facility project, which would limit the approach to right turns. Left turns from Greenburg Road would still be allowed. This change has been assumed in the pre- and post- development traffic scenarios. Existing left turns from the frontage road were assumed to turn right instead. Pre-Development Traffic Volumes Background Growth Based on discussion with City of Tigard staff, background growth in the area is assumed to be 2% per year. Figure 4 present one year of background growth at this rate at the study area intersections. In-process Developments In-process traffic is generated by approved projects not yet completed at the time of this analysis. An indoor skydiving facility is anticipated to be built at 10655 SW Greenburg Road and will generate PM peak hour trips. Trip generation for the site was calculated based on a parking study prepared by Transportation Engineering North West at a similar site in Tukwilla, Washington. Figure 5 presents the in- process site trip assignment associated with this development. Pre-development Traffic Pre-development traffic is the combination of existing traffic, background growth, and in-process traffic. Figure 5 presents the 2015 Pre-development volumes for the study area intersections. 5 H:\Projects\213038906\WP\RPT-GtyofTigard-Transportation ImpactAnalysis-1406P4.doa IM M . IV. SITE DEVELOPMENT Access The subject lot has street frontages on both SW Shady Lane and SW Greenburg Road. Access will be provided through existing driveway on SW Shady Lane. Site Trip Generation Trip generation was estimated based on rates for similar uses in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition (2012), and the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition (2004). The following table identifies the selected land use codes and the trip estimates for the existing site use,the proposed site uses, and the net difference. Total Trips Total trips represent the total number of vehicle trips to and from the site. Pass-By Trips Pass-by trips are those site trips already driving past the site on the adjacent roadways. These trips do not increase the total traffic volumes on the roadways, but do add to turning movement volumes at the site accesses. Pass-by trips are assumed to come from Greenburg Road. Pass-by trip rates published in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition, were applied to the proposed land use. Pass-by rates are not provided for the specific land use with indoor seating. Based on discussions with City staff, it was agreed to apply the pass-by rates for a Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window (ITE 934), which are much less than a coffee shop with only a drive-through window. Primary Trips Primary trips are those site trips stopping only at the subject site and then returning to their origins. These are considered new trips generated by the development. The anticipated trip generation for the existing and proposed development is presented in the following table. TABLE 4—SITE TRIP GENERATION Site Condition Land Use Size/Rate Weekday AM Peak PM Peak (ITE Land Use Code) Existing Specialty Retail(826) 2,035 SF 90 6 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive- 2,076 SF 1,699 209 89 Through Window(937) Proposed 49%AM/ Pass-By Trips 50%PM (833) (102) (45) Primary Trips 866 107 44 Total Site Trips 776 107 38 *ITE has no data available for the weekday AM peak hour of the adjacent street,which is assumed to be zero 6 H:\Projects\213038906\NWT-City ofTigard-Transportabon Impact Analysis-140604.doa M ■ It is assumed the existing use has no AM peak hour trips, and does not have a significant number of pass-by trips at any time during the day. As presented in the previous table, the proposed facility is anticipated to generate an additional 107 AM peak hour trips and 38 PM peak hour primary trips. Site Trip Distribution Given the location of similar existing coffee shops and the likely customer base, trip distribution for primary trips is estimated as follows: • 40%to and from the north on SW Greenburg Road • 60%to and from the south on SW Greenburg Road Pass-by trip distribution is proportionate to the directional volume of traffic on Greenburg Road, with 67% northbound and 33%southbound in the AM and 33% northbound and 67%southbound in the PM. For purposes of this analysis, all trips were assumed to travel to and from the site on Greenburg Road, which provides a conservative analysis of the intersection. Some trips would be expected to use Shady Lane east of the site to access the neighborhoods to the south and east. Figure 6 presents weekday AM and PM trip assignment based on the distributions noted above. I Post-Development Post-development volumes are the combination of Pre-development volumes and the site-generated trips. Figure 7 presents the AM and PM Post-development traffic volumes. I I I I I I I Projects213038906\w%RFrcrtyorrgard Transportation impaaaa,aiysts-iao6oa.doa 7 M ■ V. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Operation Analysis Description Peak hour intersection operations analyses described in this report were performed in accordance with 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) procedures, utilizing Synchro software. The results provide an average of the intersection operation over the peak hour. Intersection operation characteristics are generally defined by two mobility standards: volume-to- capacity(v/c) ratio and level-of-service (LOS). At signalized and all-way stop-controlled intersections,the v/c ratio is a measurement of the intersection's capacity to accommodate only the critical movements, while LOS is based on the average control delay per vehicle for the entire intersection. At two-way stop- controlled intersections,the v/c ratio and LOS are based on a single critical movement or approach. The City of Tigard does not have any published mobility standards. Operation Analysis Intersection capacity calculations were conducted using the Synchro (Version 8) analysis software _ program and are based on methodologies presented in the 2010 HCM. Because the analysis procedures _ assume an isolated intersection,the impact of queues and gap creation by the nearby signals at Highway 217 ramps and Cascade Avenue is not accounted. The results presented below provide a comparison of conditions with and without the project. The following tables present operations results for existing, pre-, and post-development conditions. Copies of the reports are provided in the Appendix. TABLE 5—AM INTERSECTION OPERATIONS 1 2015 Intersection 2014 Existing Pre-Development Post-Development WC Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS SW Greenburg Road/SW Shady Lane * 0.12 54.8 F 0.13 59.2 F 0.98 217.5 F SW Shady Lane/Site Access 0.0 0,0" A 0.0 0.0 A 0.11 9.0 A *Operations reported for westbound movement I I 8 H:\ProjectsV 3038906\WP\RPT-GtyofTigard-Transportation Impact Analysis-140664.doa M M . TABLE 6—PM INTERSECTION OPERATIONS 2015 Post-Development 2014 Existing Intersection Pre-Development Full Limited V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS SW Greenburg Road/SW Shady Lane * 0.10 56.8 F 0.12 66.5 F 0.47 109.9 F SW Shady Lane/Site Access 0.0 8.6 A 0.0 8.6 A 0.05 8.8 A *Operations reported for westbound movement The site driveway is anticipated to operate at a level of service A, with very little delay and no queues expected. As noted in the above tables, the westbound left turn movement from Shady Lane to Greenburg Road currently experiences long delays. These delays will increase with the addition of site trips, especially in the busier AM peak hour,when the left turn volume will approach capacity. Observations of the existing left turn movements noted some gaps are created by the adjacent signals and the presence of queues reduces vehicle speeds allowing opportunities for left turns. • Consideration was given to limiting left turn movements to and from the Shady Lane approach in order to address long delays for left turns, and eliminate vehicles turning across standing queues during peak times. Left turns from Greenburg Road to Shady Lane do not experience long delays; however, at peak times, there may be a need to wait for queues to clear. A review of the crash data indicates only one reported incident in four years. Drivers wishing to make this left turn would likely change their route to either turn left at the Cascade Avenue signal and drive through the hotel parking lot, traveling further south on Greenburg Road to North Dakota and SW 95th Avenue, or change their travel route such that they approach Shady Lane from the south. None of these are an attractive option as they would result in cut through trips on private property or on residential streets or increase vehicle miles traveled. Similarly, prohibiting left turns from Shady Lane would cause drivers to use these alternate routes. It is unlikely drivers would reduce trip time using the longer alternate routes, and there is concern about increasing trips through the residential neighborhood. In summary, limiting left turn movements would address congestion experienced at peak times, but would also require vehicles to reroute at off-peak times. We recommend the left turn movements to L and from Shady Lane from Greenburg Road remain available. Drivers still have the option of finding alternate routes if delays are long for left turns, and based on our observations, the slower speeds and presence of queues during peak times provides opportunities for these left turn movements. I I I 9 . H:\Projects\213038906\WP\RPTCryof Tigard-Transportation ImpactMalysis-14W04.doa M M . IVI. QUEUING ANALYSIS Intersection queuing analyses was performed using Trafficware's Synchro software. The following tables Ipresent 95th percentile queue lengths for the analysis scenarios at the study area intersections. Available storage is rounded to the nearest 5 feet, and the queuing calculations assume 25 feet is needed for each vehicle. Estimated queues less than one vehicle are rounded up to a full vehicle. IQueuing analysis outputs are provided in the Appendix. ITABLE 7—WEEKDAY AM 95TH PERCENTILE QUEUING(FEET) I Intersection Approach Movement Available Existing Pre- Post- Storage Development Development I Lt,ThEll 50 Rt Rt 25 25 Greenburg Lt,Th 225 25 25 125 II Road/Shady Lane WB Rt 50 25 25 50 NB - Lt 85 25 25 25 ISB Lt 100 25 25 25 1 TABLE 8—WEEKDAY PM 95TH PERCENTILE QUEUING(FEET) III Post- Available Pre- Storage Development Intersection Approach Movement Existing Development Full IEB Lt,Th 50 25 Rt 25 25 Greenburg I Lt,Th 225 25 25 50 Road/Shady Lane WB Rt 50 25 25 25 IUB Lt 85' 25 25 25 ISB Lt 100 25 25 25 As presented in the previous tables, the anticipated 95th percentile queues can be accommodated with I available storage. It should be noted the intersection of Greenburg Road/Shady Lane is influenced by the queues of the signalized intersections north and south. Most vehicles did not block the SW Shady Lane/SW Greenburg Road intersection. When queues did extend beyond the intersection, vehicles were I still able to turn on and off of Shady Lane. The presence of queues actually provided an opportunity for turning movements to occur, as vehicles were stopped and allowed drivers to enter or exit Shady Lane. I I I H:\Projects\213038906\WP\RPT 10 CtyofTigard Transportation Impact Analysis 140604.doa M ■ VII. SUMMARY The project will redevelop the existing building at 9785 Shady Lane into a coffee shop with a drive- _ through window totaling 2,076 square feet. The site is currently being used for a 2,035-square-foot playground store with an outdoor display and sales area. The site has access to the roadway network through a driveway on SW Shady Lane. The reported crash rates at the intersection of Greenburg Road with Shady Lane are below the threshold rate of 1.0 crashes/MEV, and there are no unusual crash patterns or fatalities; therefore, further consideration for safety mitigation measures is not recommended. Traffic estimates include trips from an indoor skydiving facility proposed at 10655 SW Greenburg Road and estimates of the existing site use. The proposed facility is anticipated to generate new primary trips consisting of 107 AM peak hour trips and 37 PM peak hour trips. Operational analysis indicates long delays occur for left turns from Shady Lane to Greenburg Road; however, alternate routes are available to drivers. During peak times, queues from adjacent signals also extend across the intersection with Shady Lane, but these queues and reduced travel speeds provide opportunities for vehicles turning to and from Shady Lane. Sight distances were found to meet or exceed City of Tigard requirements at the site driveway and Shady Lane approach to Greenburg Road. No mitigation measures are recommended. ■ 1 i 1 1 1 i ' 11 H:\Projects\213038906\WP\RRTfiatyoFTi�rd Tigard-Transportation Ma on Impactalysis-1406O4.do N1 . -- VIII. APPENDIX A. Figures B. Traffic Count Summaries C. Crash Data D. Capacity Calculations I ■ I I I 1 I I ' H:\Projects\213038906\WP\RPT-0ryofTigard-Trer�sportaUon Impact Analyssa 12-140GP4.do APPENDIX A FIGURES z., J .� .. o m , 3 •_ .>.w 1 �i t i...„. . r tft3 14 • Y ' •.> "x ray %� .m9 ;; , -fi _ a x ..y ._ :' ----.: ,..2.. a_ 444 S Er_ � --'" y`Lrr ,,, ,; ' f e , , .....,,„,„,„...,,,..„ ..... z....w. ... ... / . .,. , .. �fi�v y �W k ego ._ , • L ` ; . • .. . , i ..., . , ... Goole erth . . ,--_,:siyk)oot:,,D.:1-,........,,...,,,,,,,,si', 4..., ,. — ''--4'-'''''''s. R '''' ' — '.. Portland Vancouver Seattle DATE: 04.01.14 503.224.9560 360.695.7879M 206.749.9993 N VICINITY MAP FIGURE www.mcknze.com yZj DRAWN BY: KLA Architecture=Interiors < CHECKED BY: BTA ® Planning.Engineering f © MACKENZIE 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED JOB NO: SHADY LANE RETAIL THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF MACKENZIE AND ARE NOT TO BE 21 30389.06 TIGARDY OREGON USED OR REPRODUCED RJ ANY MANNER,WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION _1I C 2 (5 ,; II a ii 4.4. U h 0 x JI Y i II - - - 1 (: II , � � 1 T I_I 1 1, lI I- 0 — — t t r0 /\ .2-3,,,,u) _ 1 zw � I� —I II 0 - .1 1- I w w _I I • z I I� — ---l.; i i � _ JI �i — —, i ' -� I s T f , f_ I I,L II _ _ . , ,� }I . II1 1 I — 1 i I j ^I I a o 0 0 I, j I I 1 1 I I 11 I I I II 11 I, ill i di JI 0, 3N �s , /r' o II / • .o JI h, vu JI r d c L 1 II Portland Vancouver Seattle W DATE: 04.01.14 503.224.9560 360 695 7679 206.749.9993 N FIGURE www.mcknze.com w DRAWN BY: KLA SITE PLAN Ne MACRArchitecture•Interiors ` CHECKED BY2 : BTA JI II Planning•Engineering z © ENZIE 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESFAVFD JOB Na SHADY LANE RETAIL THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF MACKENZIE AND ARE NOT TO ME - 2130389.06 TIGARD. OREGON USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER,WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION E 1O SipNOT TO SCALE 0,9� Si. e4, RrO 4, 4'o 7 tier i i / i - d SW SHADY LANE SW CASCADE AVE Q9 1 2 ck- ] 4cb, �� I �: 7 I EXISTING PROPOSED 1 1 �el (:::11\6: X �„ r:11\il I < <• .> <II. 1 ÷ /ii � 1 2 1 I 7 I IT ■ IT JM Fco2l49 60 Van360.69°8 9r 2�Se99993 N DATE o4.os.i4 EXISTING AND PROPOSED LANE FIGURE www.mcknze.com Y DRAWN BY: KLA CONFIGURATIONS AND TRAFFIC Architecture•Interiors ` CHECKED BY: BTA 3 1 U Planning-Engineering x © MACKENZIE 2014 ALL JOB NO: SHADY LANE RETAIL RIGHTS RESERVED Z (� THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF MACKENZIE AND ARE NOT TO BE 21 30389.06 TIGARD, OREGON USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER,WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION S, NOT TO SCALE 0,9ir- S'P eFq RTO ti T b tier 3 / 1/• SW SHADY LANE SW CASCADE AVE 49 1 2 Co cb C, EXISTING VOLUMES BACKGROUND GROWTH ,- � (/.......000 000 1 j \, 1 j \, ,! j �,_ ,� j L_ (./. o-AM —0a 76�AM,47 0- AM.4-0 2-0-AM-4-1 K.."- ...._k r0- —0 0- r0 Oti —0� 1r V\ 1r � 1r � Tr001 M 000 N0 �' 2 1 2 M M M O 0 (-0 (, ,-_--- (--. 0 . INN 1 j , 1 j , 1 1 \ 1 \, o� PM�a5 38—0- PM�s9 0-'4' I,PM•--o �� PM--o 6ti �7 0ti �0 0~ r0 1— r0 � 1r '\ 1r 1r 01r 0100 000 1 1 r 2 1 2 IPortland Vancouver Seattle m DATE: 04.02.14 EXISTING AND BACKGROUND FIGURE 503224.9560 360.695.7879 206 749 9993 N www.mcknze.com w DRAWN BY: KLA GROWTH TRAFFIC VOLUMES — tArchitecture•interiors ` CHECKED BY: BTA AM AND PM PEAK HOUR 4 R Planning•Engineering f JOB NO: SHADY LANE RETAIL THESE DRANiNGS AREDTHEZPROIE ERTY OF4 AL RMAC ENZIIEE A DIGHTS D ARE NOT TO BE 2130389.06 USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER,WITHOUT PRIOR NRITTEN PERMISSION TIGARD. OREGON .5`4, NOT TO SCALE Og1- Sp eFq RrO � T /G1 4 y11Y 4 4j ,7 SW SHADY LANE SW CASCADE AVE .cP 1 2 0J IN—PROCESS PRE—DEVELOPMENT O � � Ti ( 7T NI- N O O � 11 \ —14—' X39 (..-----0 .."---0 —i AM— —AM-- AM—0 78—0-AM-4 —48 10� r �. r 13�. r9 Oti r0 sir sir � 1r v\ Tr 01 M 1 2 1 2 dNI� � M MOO , , ,‘,_- , ,- , , , , , ,, —6— PM — — PM--- PM•—os 39—• PM.-60 20~\ 1 rr ~iit1 2s—.v 1 rr7 01.E 1 rro MN CAS co 000 O 1 2 1 2 Portland Vancouver Seattle w DATE 04.02.14 IN—PROCESS AND PRE— FIGURE 503224.9560 360.695.7879 206.7499993 N IS,1 5 www.mclmze.com Y DRAWN BY: KLA DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES Architecture•Interiors ` CHECKED BY: BTA — AM AND PM PEAK HOUR ll Planning Engineering f JOB NO: SHADY LANE RETAIL © MACKENZIE 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF MACKENZIE AND ARE NOT TO BE 2130389.06 TIGARD, OREGON USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER,WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION S�, NOT TO SCALE Og4- ST 6Fq F'QT Oi, 4'QD 6,41, -") /• SW SHADY LANE SW CASCADE AVE 49 1 2 qJ co PRIMARY TRIPS PASS—BY TRIPS r N M r O i ‘4....... 1 ! � 1 X21 55� "---33 52—'9. AM— ---RAtM}�— RAtM— --AM-- � i r'�3, ~ 1 1 / —.....„\ 1 1 L4,,....:—,27 r17 ~'\ t::—.....,r r M 1 M M 1 2 1 2 °i I N 4�8 20�� � �15 23� 1 .."- PM.4— PM41— PM-- -- PM — ~'\ 1 1'r„ ~� 1 r� ~� 1 rr8 i y N N 1 2 1 2 Portland Vancouver Seattle m DATE 04.02.14 — FIGURE 503224.9560 360.695.7879 206.749.9993 N SITE TRIPS www.mcknze.com Z M y� DRAWN BY: KLA Architecture•interiors < CHECKED BY: BTA AM AND PM PEAK HOURS II Planning•Engineering g 6 JOB NO: SHADY LANE RETAIL © MACKENZIE 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF MACKENZIE AND ARE NOT TO BE 2130389.06 TIGARD, OREGON USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER,WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION _I S,* NOT TO SCALE lir Si. eFq 1 -Rro J 4r Io Ro l y�Y _I ffl SW SHADY LANE iSW CASCADE AVE �0 1 2 c. I J cp ] N(.7.0 ,1. � CCOO 000 11 \A 11 \► X93 107— '''--0ww,,,, 0 AM-4-0 78—1.-AM x---48 13--„k r57 Ki r01r 1r CoIn N 00 7I) 0 1 2 (-----r, .-----. Ln N LnOO 11 \► 11 � PM X09 39---0- PM-4---60 26ti f26 K-.........„ r0 � 1r � 1r 000 Ln N 1 2 Portland Vancouver Seattle m DATE: 04.02.14M POST—DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC FIGURE 503.224.9560 360.695.7879 206.749.9993 N www.mcknze.com ii DRAWN BY: KLA VOLUMES — AM AND PM PEAK Architecture•interiors ` CHECKED BY: BTA HOUR 7 R Planning•Engineering x JOB NO: SHADY LANE RETAIL © MAC(ENZIE 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED USEDTHESE RORE REPRARE ODUCED INH ANY MANNER,OF WITHOUT PRIOR NWRITTEN PERMISSION 2130389.06 TIG RDS OREGON ■ APPENDIX B I TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARIES I ' Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Methodf or determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume I LOCATION: SW Greenburg Rd--SW Shady Ln QC JOB#: 12431302 CITY/STATE: Tiqard, OR DATE:Tue, Feb 25 2014 1289 808 Peak-Hour:4:40 PM--5:40 PM I 3 1254 * I Peak 15-Min: 5:05 PM--5:20 PM a f I j 4 10.0 2.1 3.1 « 4 L 4 d i 4 9 6 55 62 33.3~16.7 t t 0.0• 0.0 o ~ 0.92 4 0 I o.o ♦ ~ 0.0 12 6 1 * �� 7* 40 25.0♦33.31 * �� 0.0♦ 5.0 11114' 7 6 747 8F____ j * Quality OUt1S 750.0 2.9 12.5 1267 761 �.�-.f<I _-.- j ; .., 2.2 3.4 .. ° 0 0 0 I .� ♦ 4 0 J. 0 4,ii i. .to —1 o o '.o F-- ter/„.i\>i i Ns,/ 4_, 1-- i ___I 0 • NA 1 , NA i. i_1 4 41 ii'r 4. NA ♦ ♦ NA NA * i- ~ NA ., ---- ". • 1r° F "4. * err-- j NA * NA 1 5-Min Count SW Greenburg Rd SW Greenburg Rd SW Shady Ln SW Shady Ln Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Be9innin9 At Loft _Thry Right V Left Thru Right y___ _Left__ Thry R fight_ _U Le Thru Right _ 0 4:00 PM 1 69 2 0 0 76 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 7 0 158 4:05 PM 1 70 1 0 1 94 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 177 4:10 PM 1 73 1 0 4 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 192 4:15 PM 1 72 2 0 3 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 176 4:20 PM 2 59 4 0 2 102 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 9 0 181 4:25 PM 0 49 3 0 7 74 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 138 — 4:30 PM 0 50 2 0 2 74 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 135 4:35 PM 0 50 1 0 6 102 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 166 i. 4:40 PM 0 74 1 0 3 90 0 0 2 0 0 0' 2 0 7 0 179 4:45 PM 0 68 1 0 3 93 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 174 4:50 PM 2 62 0 0 5 83 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 156 4:55 PM 0 49 1 0 3 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 152 1984 5 00 PM 0 66 2 0 4 100 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 180 2006 r4s;''• 0 1Ci9 t! 0 a 1 €° E a 0 + s.0 E„.:1;;014;:!,:k--).05.C...'' 6 = � < E>_,g_ ... , ��...€ E a. X011 7,-x,,:`,7;;1;:d,:le.IP::.`14:' us E — tI1i 59 0 1 116 1 0 0 D 60 0 0 3 98 1 Q 58 0 ' 0 1 102 1 0 I 63 0 0 1 120 0 0 54 1 0 5 101 0 0 61 1 0 1 84 0 0 51 1 0 4 107 1 0 64 2 0 3 81 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 155 2101 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 8 752 12 0 32 1416 0 0 4 0 12 0 12 0 64 0 2312 Heavy Trucks 4 28 0 0 24 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 60 Pedestrians 0 0 0 4 4 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stooped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2014 3:06 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION: SW Greenburg Rd--SW Shady Ln QC JOB#: 12431301 CITY/STATE: Tigard, OR DATE: Tue, Feb 25 2014 a1 11'19 Peak-Hour:15-Mi :7:25:50 AMAM----8:25:05 AMAM I3o 428 43 I Peak n78j +1 j 4 13.3s.2 5.8 4.7a.a 38 14 38 47 • 21.1«57.1 ' • t 0.0« :.: o '� 0.92 �' o 057.0.1:— .0 + « o.o /__ 17 ~3 7 h * �i 9 4' 76 2.1 0. 58.8♦66.71 * �,� 11.1♦ 8 1067 33 * QQUaLItY OUfttS 7 .50 4.3 1 440 1108 1 0 L 0 , . 4 .._.. _ 6.4 4.9 r 1 ° 4. 0 °0 ` d 1 j1'F' z ., . ° 1-- 1 0 0 1 F NA I � a 4I --t. � NA � L NA ~ « NA NA ♦1 I i'r 1 t •� « NA Z t o t I. t r•r j NA ♦ NA 5-Min Count SW Greenburg Rd SW Greenburg Rd SW Shady Ln SW Shady Ln Total Hourly Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left Thry� Right V 41'ff Thry Right Lgff Thru_ Right U Left_ Thru Right -U, 7:00 AM 1 61 5 0 1 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 100 7:05 AM 0 60 2 0 3 3'6' 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 106 7:10AM 0 70 4 0 3 31 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 117 7:15 AM 0 88 3 0 3 26 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 5 0 129 7:20 AM 1 81 2 0 1 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 118 7:25AM 0 68 3 0 0 38 2 0 4 0 1. 0' 1 0 3 0 120 7:30 AM 0 94 2 0 1 20 1' 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 121 7:35 AM 0 89. 1 0 3 33 4 0. 1 0 0 0; 0 0 4 0 135 7:40 AM 1 90', 4 0 5, 31 3' 0 1' 0 0 0 ' 1 0 4 0 140 745 AM 1 89 2 Q 2 32 2' 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 135 V, 1✓, .-* „ Y.., ,^;0: b'--__•� n 4,, F. �a�� '=t�` ,e .t. z?`.,,c t ..,,,,,,...:18,p . 8:05 AM 1 82 4 0 3 43 4: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 143 1614 8:10 AM 2 76 4 0 9 38 3 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 4 0 140 1637 8:15 AM 0 100 1 0 3 40 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 152 1664 8'20 AM 2 81+ 3 0 4 36 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 131 1673 8:25 AM 1 69 5 0 5 31 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 118 1671 8:30 AM 2 62 3 0 4 36 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 115 1665 8:35 AM 0 73 1 0 4 46 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 130 1660 8:40 AM 3 59 3 0 3 26 4 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 4 0 107 1627 8:45 AM 3 64 1 0 0 50 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 125 1617 8:50 AM 4 65 3 0 3 38 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 118 1584 8:55 AM 1 62 2 0 2 40 7 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 119 1557 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 4 1192 36 0 52 468 24 0 12 0 0 0 8 0 28 0 1824 Heavy Trucks 4 60 4 0 12 8 12 0 0 0 0 0 100 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2014 3:06 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 APPENDIX C CRASH DATA 11111 1111 ■■ I IPS N On M Mill MEI MI 1111111 MN r IPS l III ®t 1.11 Will I I I CDS150 02/28/2014 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION-CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE SW Greenburg Road&Highway 217 Beaverton-Tigard Highway SB Ramps(144) January 1,2010 through December 31,2012 NON- PROPERTY INTER- FATAL FATAL DAMAGE TOTAL PEOPLE PEOPLE DRY WET INTER- SECTION OFF- COLLISION TYPE CRASHES CRASHES ONLY CRASHES KILLED INJURED TRUCKS SURF SURF DAY DARK SECTION RELATED ROAD YEAR: 2012 REAR-END 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2012 TOTAL 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 YEAR: 2011 REAR-END 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 0 2011 TOTAL 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 0 YEAR: 2010 REAR-END 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 2010 TOTAL 0 2 1 3 0 2 0 2 1 1 2 3 0 0 FINAL TOTAL 0 4 5 9 0 4 0 6 2 6 3 9 0 0 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable,non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 RAN TIO SE - C ,-,�:, ,.,NALY ..JI ,,_;ND R, :. .,:ING CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING SW Greenburg Road & Highway 217 Beaverton-Tigard Highway SB Ramps (144) January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2012 RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN ?010 WASHINGTON 1 16 2 INTER CROSS N N CLD S-1STOP O1 NONE 0 STRGHT TIGARD 6 0 SW GREENBURG RD S TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE S N 000 PORTLAND UA 4.90 SB EX GRNBRG RD Cl 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 F OR-Y 026 000 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S N 011 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 59 F OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 (011 WASHINGTON 1 16 2 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT TIGARD 6 0 SW GREENBURG RD S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR RENTL S N 000 PORTLAND UA 4.90 SB EF GRNBRG RD C3 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 46 M OR-Y 026 000 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S N 011 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 41 M OR-Y 000 000 OR>25 03 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE S N 022 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 M OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 ?011 WASHINGTON 1 16 2 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT TIGARD 6 0 SW GREENBURG RD CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N S 000 PORTLAND UA 4.90 SB EX GRNBRG RD Cl 01 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 62 F OTH-Y 026 000 N-RES 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N S 011 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 52 F OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 (010 WASHINGTON 1 16 2 INTER CROSS N N CLR 0-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L TIGARD 6 0 SW GREENBURG RD CN L-GRN-SIG N DRY TURN PRVTE N E 000 PORTLAND UA 4.90 SB EF GRNBRG RD C3 04 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 71 F OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S N 000 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 24 M OR-Y 020 000 OR<25 ?012 WASHINGTON 1 16 2 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT TIGARD 6 0 SW GREENBURG RD CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE S N 000 PORTLAND UA 4.90 SB EF GRNBRG RD C3 04 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 64 M OR-Y 043,026 000 OR<25 02 NONE 0 TURN-R PRVTE S E 013 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 31 F OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 1 ..2ANS___ ._.TION1, . _.! SEC._ . r CRL.:.. NALYL_ _ ...NR1IIhIIIJkING Wl mow um mini OM i CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING SW Greenburg Road & Highway 217 Beaverton-Tigard Highway SB Ramps (144) January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2012 RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN 2010 WASHINGTON 1 19 1 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT TIGARD 6 0 SW GREENBURG RD NW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NW SE 000 PORTLAND UA 4.97 SB EX GRNBRG RD Cl 06 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 M OR-Y 043,026 000 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NW SE 011 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 27 F OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 03 UNKN 9 STOP UNKN NW SE 022 UNKNOWN 01 DRVR NONE 00 U UNK 000 000 UNK 2011 WASHINGTON 1 19 1 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT TIGARD 6 0 SW GREENBURG RD NW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NW SE 000 PORTLAND UA 4.97 SB EX GRNBRG RD Cl 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 46 M OR-Y 014,026 088 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NW SE 011 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 31 F OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 02 PSNG NO<5 04 F 000 000 2011 WASHINGTON 1 19 1 INTER CROSS N N UNK S-1STOP 01 UNKN 0 STRGHT TIGARD 6 0 SW GREENBURG RD NW TRF SIGNAL N UNK REAR UNKN NW SE 000 PORTLAND UA 4.97 SB EX GRNBRG RD Cl 06 0 N DAY PDO UNKNOWN 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 026 000 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NW SE 011 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 46 F OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 2012 WASHINGTON 1 12 1 INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT TIGARD 6 0 SW GREENBURG RD NW TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE NW SE 000 PORTLAND UA 4.97 SB EX GRNBRG RD Cl 06 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 F OR-Y 026 000 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE NW SE 011 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 27 F OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 CDS150 02/28/2014 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION-CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE SW Greenburg Road&SW Cascade Avenue January 1,2010 through December 31,2012 NON- PROPERTY INTER- FATAL FATAL DAMAGE TOTAL PEOPLE PEOPLE DRY WET INTER- SECTION OFF- COLLISION TYPE CRASHES CRASHES ONLY CRASHES KILLED INJURED TRUCKS SURF SURF DAY DARK SECTION RELATED ROAD YEAR: 2012 FIXED/OTHER OBJECT 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 REAR-END 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 2 2 4 0 5 1 1 3 2 2 4 0 0 2012 TOTAL 0 4 3 7 0 8 1 2 5 4 3 7 0 1 YEAR: 2011 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 2011 TOTAL 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 YEAR: 2010 REAR-END 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2010 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 FINAL TOTAL 0 5 5 10 0 9 1 4 6 6 4 10 0 1 Disclaimer.. A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable,non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. i ``ND KLI���Ilr..ING.. MR1.- lig PM MIN 1111111 MIN RANS._,. ..._,TION SEC's__,,.. CR,,, , ,,'NALY..�.. ,.' • URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING IGTON COUNTY SW Greenburg Road & SW Cascade Avenue January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2012 INT-TYP SPCL USE E CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFF-RD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED E FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN 23/2012 16 SW CASCADE AVE INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 0 SW GREENBURG RD NE TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE NE SW 000 06 1 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 F OR-Y 043,026 000 OR>25 02 NONE 0 STOP • PRVTE NE SW 011 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 62 M OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 ' 02 PSNG INJC 75 M 000 000 28/2012 16 SW CASCADE AVE INTER 3-LEG N Y CLD FIX OBJ 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 0 SW GREENBURG RD SW TRF SIGNAL N DRY FIX PRVTE NE SW 088 06 1 Y DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 F OR-Y 080,081 017 OR<25 04/2012 16 SW CASCADE AVE INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 0 SW GREENBURG RD SW TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE SW NE 001 06 1 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 17 F OR-Y 043,026,017 000 OR<25 ' 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 66 F OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 02 PSNG NO<5 03 M 000 000 23/2011 17 SW CASCADE AVE INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-OTHER 01 NONE 0 TURN-R 0 SW GREENBURG RD SW YIELD N WET TURN PRVTE W SW 000 09 1 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 53 F OR-Y 014,026 000 OR<25 ' 02 NONE 0 TURN-R PRVTE W SW 013 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 53 F OR-Y 000 000 • OR<25 20/2010 17 SW CASCADE AVE INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 0 SW GREENBURG RD W TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N S 000 06 1 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 37 M OR-Y 026 000 OR<25 , 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N SW 013 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 31 F OR-Y 000 000 • OR<25 06/2012 17 SW CASCADE AVE INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN S-OTHER 01 NONE 0 TURN-R 0 SW GREENBURG RD W YIELD N WET TURN PRVTE W SW 000 09 1 N DAY PDO TRUCK 01 DRVR NONE 00 M 0TH-Y 026 000 UNK 02 NONE 0 TURN-R • PRVTE W SW 013 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 59 M OR-Y 000 000 OR>25 lila MN IIIIII IMP NMI VIII IIIII�RANS�.�IJ�.ISiiTIONIII II1 SECI1I111�I�1 CRS�SYIIILF,NALY]JI J..IND VR.IR!..PING 1 ...:. I-- i r ! ( i URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING IGTON COUNTY SW Greenburg Road & SW Cascade Avenue January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2012 INT-TYP SPCL USE E CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFF-RD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED E FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN 20/2011 16 SW CASCADE AVE INTER 3-LEG N N CLR 0-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 0 SW GREENBURG RD CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE SW W 000 01 1 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 37 F OR-Y 004,028 000 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE NE SW 000 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 M OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 03/2012 16 SW CASCADE AVE INTER 3-LEG N N CLR 0-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 0 SW GREENBURG RD CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE SW W 000 01 1 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 51 F OR-Y 004,028 000 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT i PRVTE NE SW 000 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 62 M OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 23/2012 16 SW CASCADE AVE INTER 3-LEG N N CLR O-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 0 SW GREENBURG RD CN TRF SIGNAL N WET TURN PRVTE SW W 000 01 1 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 M OR-Y 004,028 000 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE NE SW 000 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 30 F OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 02 PSNG INJC 08 F 000 000 23/2012 16 SW CASCADE AVE INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN O-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 0 SW GREENBURG RD CN TRF SIGNAL N WET TURN PRVTE NE SW 000 01 0 N DUSK INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 46 F OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 02 PSNG INJB 45 M 000 000 03 PSNG INJB 16 F 000 000 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE SW W 000 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 54 F OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 111111 MI — I N OM — N — M SW NW S — all OM OM V V CDS150 02/28/2014 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION-TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PAGE: 1 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION-CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE SW Greenburg Road/Greenburg Frontage Road&SW Shady Lane January 1,2010 through December 31,2012 NON- PROPERTY INTER- FATAL FATAL DAMAGE TOTAL PEOPLE PEOPLE DRY WET INTER- SECTION OFF- COLLISION TYPE CRASHES CRASHES ONLY CRASHES KILLED INJURED TRUCKS SURF SURF DAY DARK SECTION RELATED ROAD YEAR: 2012 REAR-END 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 2012 TOTAL 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 YEAR: 2011 REAR-END 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 SIDESWIPE-OVERTAKING 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2011 TOTAL 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 YEAR: 2010 TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 2010 TOTAL 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 FINAL TOTAL 0 3 3 6 0 3 0 3 3 4 2 6 0 0 Disclaimer. A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable,non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 '-'1 Ilk ...PION .:., SEC.... . I CRF.,o.. VALY1-_.. ,'.ND RL.:..,....ING L...... CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING SW Greenburg Road/Greenburg Frontage Road & SW Shady Lane January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2012 RD# FC INT-TYP SPCL USE COUNTY COMPNT CONN # RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S CITY MLG TYP FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED URBAN AREA MILEPNT SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CNTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN )011 WASHINGTON 1 16 2 INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT TIGARD 6 0 GREENBURG FR RD N STOP SIGN N DRY REAR UNKN N S 000 PORTLAND UA 4.85 SW GREENBURG RD 06 1 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 026 000 UNK 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE N S 012 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 59 M OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 ?010 WASHINGTON 1 16 2 INTER CROSS N N RAIN ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-L TIGARD 6 0 GREENBURG FR RD W STOP SIGN N WET TURN PRVTE W NE 018 PORTLAND UA 4.85 SW GREENBURG RD 05 1 Y DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 49 M OR-Y 028 000 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE NE SW 000 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 48 F OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 ?011 WASHINGTON 1 16 2 INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT TIGARD 6 0 SW GREENBURG RD CN STOP SIGN N WET SS-O PRVTE S N 000 PORTLAND UA 4.85 SW SHADY LN 04 1 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 53 M OTH-Y 028,045 000 N-RES 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE S N 000 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 40 F OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 IIIII Imo III, ills am me A1IIIIrANS1iIIIIITIONIII11 SECIIIiI_ Ail INALYINC) II LNG liii ow 11111 URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING IGTON COUNTY SW Greenburg Road/Greenburg Frontage Road & SW Shady Lane January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2012 INT-TYP SPCL USE E CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFF-RD WTHR CRASH TYP TRLR QTY MOVE A S DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL TYP OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED . E FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# VEH TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACTN 17/2010 16 GREENBURG FR RD INTER CROSS N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 0 SW GREENBURG RD SW STOP SIGN N DRY TURN PRVTE NE SW 000 05 1 Y DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 70 M OR-Y 000 000 OR<25 02 NONE 0 TURN-L PRVTE W NE 018 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 31 M OR-Y 028 000 OR<25 15/2012 16 SW GREENBURG RD INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 0 SW SHADY LN SW TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE SW NE 000 06 1 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 026 000 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STOP PRVTE SW NE 011 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 50 M OR-Y 000 000 OR>25 10/2012 16 SW GREENBURG RD INTER CROSS N N CLD O-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 0 SW SHADY LN CN STOP SIGN N DRY TURN PRVTE NE E 000 04 1 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 M OR-Y 004,028 000 OR<25 02 NONE 0 STRGHT PRVTE SW NE 000 PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 23 M SUSP 000 000 OR<25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 r 1 1 1 1 t APPENDIX D CAPACITY CALCULATIONS I HCM 2010 TWSC 1: SW SHADY LANE & SW GREENBURG ROAD 6/3/2014 I Int Delay,s/veh 2.4 }} m 0 I k Vol,veh/h 14 0 ' 3 9 0 38 8 1067 33 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 50 105 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 I Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 10 10 10 2 2 2 5 5 5 Mvmt Flow 15 0 3 10 0 41 9 1160 36 Conflicting Flow All 1770 1788' 249 �1521 1786X1178 498 0 0 I Stage 1 575 575 - 1195 1195 - - - Stage 2 1195 1213 - 326 591 - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.45 6.65 7.05 7.33 6.53 6.23 4.2 II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.65 5.65 -- 6.13 5.53 - - - - _ Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.25 5.656.53 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.595 4.095 3.395 3.519 4.019 3.319 2.25 - I Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 55 76 731 89 81 232 1041 - - Stage 1 455 486 227 259 - Stage 2 215 242 - 661 494 - - - - Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 42 69 731 82 74 232 1041 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 42 69 - 82 74 - - - - Stage 1 451 446 225 257 IStage 2 175 240 - 604 453 - - - HCM Control Delay,s 114.3 29.7 0.1 HCM LOS F D ;.; •, ' :,<,, �`�&� ;dw„:.�.�4,is:. Capacity(veh/h) 1041 - - 50 82 232 570 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio " 0.008 0.37 0.119 0.178 0.082 - I HCM Control Delay(s) 8.5 - - 114.3 54.8 23.8 11.9 - - HCM'Lane LOS A - F F CB - - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - 1.3 0.4 0.6 0.3 I Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Existing AM Peak Hour Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: SW SHADY LANE & SW GREENBURG ROAD 6/3/2014 r IInt Delay,s/veh IVol,veh/h 43 428 30 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free - Free Free ' RT Channelized - - None Storage Length 100 - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - I Grade,% - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 6 6 6 Mvmt Flow 47 465 33 I Conflicting Flow All 1196 0 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy 4.16 1111 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 ` - - ' Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 570 - - Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 - - Platoon blocked,% -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 570 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver -' - Stage 1 - IStage 2 - -• - g 1 p 7 `z A fid° s,� �2"E n +^ '.a,.>y... .w:a, �C,.3 .,�a::.. }, a,,z3.»,� ,x .n..a`,,z�4,�R�s,"�9;'� �i 5; �; �Erf' ` ,a HCM Control Delay,s 1 — HCM LOS Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Existing AM Peak Hour Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: SW SHADY LANE & SITE DRIVEWAY 6/3/2014 Int Delay,s/veh 0 «{„ ,,; „.. ` � _ ..I x , Vol,veh/h 0 76 0 0 47 0 0 0 0 — Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 -0 -0 - Grade,% 0 - - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 - Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 — Mvmt Flow 0 83 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 - Conflicting Flow All 51 0 0 83 0 0 134 134 83 Stage 1 83 83 Stage 2 - - - - - - 51 51 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1555 - - 1514 - - 838 757 976 Stage 1 - - - - 925 826 Stage 2 - 962 852 - Platoon blocked,% - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1555 - - 1514 - - 838 757 976 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 838 757 - Stage 1 925 826 - Stage 2 - - - - - 962 852 - HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Capacity(veh/h) - 1555 - - 1514 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - HCM Control Delay(s) 0 0 0 0 HCM Lane LOS A AA - - A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - 0 - 0 Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Existing AM Peak Hour Page 3 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: SW SHADY LANE & SITE DRIVEWAY 6/3/2014 I ��.�-.._...,z ...w�,' •. ��.�. a` ..-,. �..,....g...� t. ���� "e ".R..�1� .-.w.,...�s.Laf e» ..u �a.....ai¢bsa,_.._v.%u Int Delay,s/veh — as t> 1"�� i � .<, +w #-a�a,.<"-€ /.';: E_ Vol,veh/h 0 0 0 — Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 _ Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None Storage Length - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 Grade,% 0 - ■ Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 — Conflicting Flow All 134 134 51 Stage 1 51 51 Stage 2 83 83 - _ Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - — Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 -- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 838 757 1017 Stage 1 962 852 Stage 2 925 826 — Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 838 757 1017 -- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 838 757 - Stage 1 962 852 Stage 2 925 826 HCM Control Delay,s 0 HCM LOS A Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Existing AM Peak Hour Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: SW SHADY LANE & SW GREENBURG ROAD 6/3/2014 Int Delay,s/veh 1 8 Vol,vehlh 6 0 6 7 0 55 6 747 8 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop '' Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free ' RT Channelized - - None - None - -- None - Storage Length50 105 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 II Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 25 25 25 0 0 0 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 7 0 7 8 0 60 7 812 9 Conflicting Flow All 21263 2268 683 1580 2265 816 1366 0 0 Stage1 1434 1434 - 829 829 - - - - Stage 2 829 834 - 751 1436 - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.675 6.875 7.275 7.3 6.5 6.2 4.16 - - II Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.875 5.875 6.1 5.5 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.475 5.875 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.7375 4.2375 3.5375 3.5 4 3.3 2.23 - II Pot Cap1 Maneuver 20 32 351 82 41 380 494 - - Stage 1 120 169 - 368 388 - - - - Stage 2 323 342 - 373 201 - - - - IPlMovatoon Cap blocMked,°/o - - 1Maneuver 16 30 351 77 39 380 494 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 16 30 77 39 - - Stage 1 118 162 - 363 383 - - -111 Stage 2 268 337 - 350 192 - - HCM Control Delay,s 188.2 20.8 0.1 HCM LOS F '' C Capacity(veh/h) 494 - - 31 77 380 808 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - 0.421 0.099 0.157 0.043 - 1111 HCM Control Delay(s) 12.4 - - 188.2 56.8 16.2 9.7 - HCM Lane LOS B - F F C A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 1.4 0.3 0.6 0.1 - I 1 Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Existing PM Peak Hour Page 1 1 IHCM 2010 TWSC 1: SW SHADY LANE & SW GREENBURG ROAD 6/3/2014 ,.1.i.x.,a„.„,„.,�_:,,.:,.�.N „o � � ,:.£�,.etiz,=...,..�„.:..s.,.„«, ..,,aa,.. sau^'�a I Int Delay,s/veh `P'� .#.>a� I Vol,veh/h 32 1254 3 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free ' RT Channelized - - None Storage Length 100,_ Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 35 1363 3 { BI ' Conflicting Flow All 821 0 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 - - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 I Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 808 Stage 1 Stage 2 - - - Platoon blocked,% - - IMov Cap-1 Maneuver 808 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - Stage 1 I Stage 2 - HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 HCM LOS r I I Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Existing PM Peak Hour Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: SW SHADY LANE & SITE DRIVEWAY 6/3/2014 Int Delay,s/veh 0.4 Vol,veh/h 2 38 0 0 59 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 41 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 64 0 0 41 0 0 112110 41 Stage 1 46 46 Stage2 - - - - - 66 64 `' - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 6,12 5,52 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1538 - - 1568 - - 866 780 1030 Stage 1 - - - 968 857 - Stage 2 945 842 - Platoon blocked,% - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1538 - - 1568 863 779 1030 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 863 779 - Stage 1 967 856 Stage 2 - - - - 942 842 r � �i- "•V.: b3.�, ! d ,�A, s, � _ m;�.. !�' a. <SkT `•.,' i '`yx.,: HCM Control Delay,s 0.4 0 0 HCM LOS A a Capacity(veh/h) - 1538 - - 1568 - - 1000 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - - - '0.003 HCM Control Delay(s) 0 7.3 0 0 8.6 HCM Lane LOS A A "A - A - A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 0 0 I Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Existing PM Peak Hour Page 3 I 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: SW SHADY LANE & SITE DRIVEWAY 6/3/2014 i �z .�% -..°.>,,., r.a,...,..sewste .,,..�...u___..a_,.., s: .....».,a, ✓ ,a � -F.,.,....»...>,m.,.z,,,,,.wk :sl-,.,.,a,.s,.....u..r � .,s ,.�,..�......zcss3�,. va......,x,.....W _.u..... '' I Int Delay,s/veh R • • ,b .�,�, ,�+.am,.�`a ,,,,, ,,,,,,,;,,,,z. a�m'€d..+ .R.zs..,,.>,-�„c,� ,„,h Vol,veh/h 0 0 3 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None Storage Length -`' - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - ' Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 3 €` €s. z - - `ray ' Conflicting Flo6 1w All 1104 11064 64 S Stage 2 46 46 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 I Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 868 780 1000 Stage 1 947 842 Stage 2 968 857 - ' Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 867 779 1000 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 867 779 - Stage 1 946 842 — IStage 2 967 856 HCM Control Delay,s 8.6 HCM'LOS A – Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Existing PM Peak Hour Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: SW SHADY LANE & SW GREENBURG ROAD 6/3/2014 IInt Delay,s/veh 1.3 Vol,veh/h 0 0 13 9 0 39 8 1090 34 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free I RI Channelized - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 0 - 50 105 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 Grade,% - 0 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 10 10 10 2 2 2 5 5 5 Mvmt Flow 0 0 14 10 0 42 9 1185 37 ,. a :a..,a�' Conflicting Flow All 1811 " 1829 254 1557 1825 1203 509 0 0 Stage1 590 590 1221 1221 Stage 2 1221 1239 336 604 - - - Critical Hdwy 7.45 6.65 7.05 7.33 6.53 6.23 4.2 - - Critical HdwyStg 1 6.65 5.65' 6,13 5.53 - - - — Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.25 5.65 6.53 5.53 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.595 4.095 3.395 3.519 4.019 3.319 2.25 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 51 71 725 84 77 224 1032 - - Stage 1 446 478 - 219 251 - - Stage 2 208 235 652 487 - -- — Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 38 64 725 76 70 224 1032 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 38 64 - 76 70 Stage 1 442 437 - 217 249 -- - Stage 2 167 233 - 584 445 � - "a'' ffiz..s:.a ,f-'. HCM Control Delay,s 10.1 31.3 0.1 HCM LOS B D a«,6 ... Capacity(veh/h) 1032 - - 725 76 224 557 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - 0.019 0.129 0.189 0.086 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.5 - 10.1 59.2 24.8 12.1 HCM Lane LOS A - - BF CB HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 0.4 0.7 0.3 - - Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Pre-Development AM Peak Hour Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: SW SHADY LANE & SW GREENBURG ROAD 6/3/2014 �ftq . «n. �arr .z,s Int Delay,s/veh Vol,veh/h 44 442 26 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None I Storage Length 100 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 6 6 6 Mvmt Flow 48 480 28 _ Conflicting Flow All 1222 0 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy 4.16 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 557 Stage 1 - - Stage 2 Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 557 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - Stage 1 Stage 2 - - - HCM Control Delay,s 1 HCM LOS Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report ' Pre-Development AM Peak Hour Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: SW SHADY LANE & SITE DRIVEWAY 6/3/2014 Int Delay,s/veh 0 Vol,vehih 0 78 0 0 48 0 >...,.. 0 0 .... . 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - None 1 Storage Length - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 - 0 Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 85 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 52 0 0 85 0 0 137137 85 Stage 1 - - - 85_ 85 Stage 2 - - - - - - 52 52 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1554 - - 1512 - - 834 754 974 Stage 1 - - - - - - 923 824 - — Stage 2 - 961 852 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1554 1512 - 834 754 974 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 834 754 Stage 1 923 824 Stage 2 - - - - 961 852 HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A •it $ . � � r8 x - 30� do .. ja ! `�Sa C °` w1 G x`43 Capacity(veh/h) - 1554 - - 1512 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - HCM Control Delay(s) 0 0 - 0 O HCM Lane LOS A A -' A - - A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 0 Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Pre-Development AM Peak Hour Page 3 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: SW SHADY LANE & SITE DRIVEWAY 6/3/2014 Int Delay,s/veh Vol,vehlh 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control ' Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None Storage Length - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 137 137 52 Stage 1 52 52 Stage 2 85 85 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6,12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4,018' 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 834 754 1016 Stage 1 961 852 - Stage 2 923 824 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 834 754 1016 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 834 754 - Stage 1 961 852 Stage 2 923 824 - HCM Control Delay,s 0 HCM LOS A fir bs,wF ,l �Aaw...,' Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Pre-Development AM Peak Hour Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: SW SHADY LANE & SW GREENBURG ROAD 6/3/2014 w ' . &�.�u.:.;�e�„tv.»'. Int Delay,s/veh 1 Vol,veh/h 0 1' 26 7 0 56 9 764 8 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - 0 - - 50 105 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 Grade,% - 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 25 25 25 0 0 0 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 0 0 28 8 0 61 10 830 9 Lz. , .�< _ Conflicting Flow All 2322 23271, 700 1622 2326 835 1400 0 0 Stage 1 1468 1468 854 854 Stage 2 854 859 - 768 1472 - - - Critical Hdwy 7.675 6.875 7.275 7.3 6.5 6.2 4.16 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.875 5.875 6.1 5.5 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.475 5.875 - 6.5 5.5 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.7375 4.2375 3.5375 3.5 4 3.3 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 18 29 342 76 38 371 479 Stage 1 114 163 - 356 378 - - - - Stage 2 313 332 - 365 193 - - - - Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 14 27 342 66 36 371 479 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 14 27 - 66 36 - - Stage 1 112 156 349 370 Stage 2 256 325 320 184 - - - HCM Control Delay,s 16.5 22.1 0.1 HCM LOS C C -ro F krmZ a.Sx'x.:�3� a k�kA#axe G• # — Capacity(veh/h) 479 - - 342 66 371 796 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio' 0.02 - 0.083 0.115 0.164 0.045 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 12.7 - - 16.5 66.5 16.6 9.7 - - HCM Lane LOS B - C F C A - - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.1 Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Pre-Development PM Peak Hour Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: SW SHADY LANE & SW GREENBURG ROAD 6/3/2014 Int Delay,s/veh Vol,veh/h 33 1281 7 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None Storage Length 100 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 Grade,% 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 36 1392 8 Conflicting Flow All 839 0 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 796 Stage 1 - - Stage 2 Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 796 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - Stage 1 Stage 2 - - - •._• � ,;-_ HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 HCM LOS Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Pre-Development PM Peak Hour Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: SW SHADY LANE & SITE DRIVEWAY 6/3/2014 • c max.-,_....... ,.. g 4 Int Delay,s/veh 0.4 Vol,veh/h 2 39 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 — Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None _ Storage Length - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 42 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 §�•"{:��r tom#""'i#i p� �'' s _ {t Y�E � � .� {��4 §s _. E„` £ T,E �` >;' a3 �„fi8: �xi "e" iwD .'$s t.hc3c5+-sxa d&�xw.dw�.wk..x, »� � a'1• r'�k«: n.dre'rw: tdu'k't'u%w3w.. .,,v^. ry wcta «uwn xewn. w Conflicting Flow All 65 0 0 42 0 0 114 112 42 Stage 1 - - - - 47 47 Stage 2 ' - - - - 67 65 Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.12 5.52 — Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 I Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1537 -- 1567 -- - 863 778 1029 Stage 1967 856 Stage 2 - - - - - - 943 841 - Platoon blocked,% - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1537 - - 1567 - - 860 777 1029 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 860 777 Stage 1 966 855 IStage 2 - - - - 940 841 K . I HCM Control Delay,s 0.4 0 0 HCM LOS A Capacity(veh/h) - 1537 - - 1567 - - 999 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.001 - - - 0.003 ' HCM Control Delay(s) 0 7.3 0 � 0 - - 8.6 HCM Lane LOS A A A A - - A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - 0 0 0 I r Synchro 8 Report Shady Pre DevelopmentLaneRetail PM Peak Hour Page 3 I HCM 2010 TWSC 2: SW SHADY LANE & SITE DRIVEWAY 6/3/2014 Int Delay,s/veh ca Vol,'veh/h 0 0 3 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 _ Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None Storage Length - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 — Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 3 .�A - Conflicting Flow All 112 112 65 Stage 1 65 65 - - Stage 2 47 47 - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 866 778 999 Stage 1 946 841 - Stage 2 967 856 - --- Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 865 777 999 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 865 777 - Stage 1 945 841 - Stage 2 966 855 : ��..� g�#���'���=�€,.�.� a ¥;:� `�`���� -�� :.•m '�r 'a.:� P". ' '�s ,��x�a* �;j �$t, „ HCM Control Delay,s 8.6 HCM L0S A i+" s'C t�` y ,;' f "tb¢�rg'y 'z� _ # ■ 7�.g;�f d �'�,L,. �"R�.5y �ry�4�`'�=� ,"�a'd>,.. � w �������' `� f� ,� azur�i.-as,ab">x: �3.•,,z.'v....rs.�� 2Ts.�'eadt`�«-..: 1 I Synchro 8 Report PreShady DevelopmentLaneRetail PM Peak Hour Page 4 I HCM 2010 TWSC 1: SW SHADY LANE & SW GREENBURG ROAD 6/3/2014 Int Delay,s/veh 9 Vol,veh/h 0 0 13 57 0 93 8 1055 102 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - 0 - - 50 105 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade,% - 0 ` - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 10 10 10 2 2 2 5 5 5 Mvmt Flow 0 0 14 62 0 101 9 1147 111 ',4 � e �� - Conflicting Flow All 1877 ? 1932 245 1631 1891 1202 490 0 1 Stage 1 657 657 - 1220 1220 - - - - - Stage 2 1220 1275 - 411 671 - - - Critical Hdwy 7.45 6.65 7.05 7.33 6.53 6.23 4.2 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.65 5.65 6.13 5.53 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.25 5.65 - 6.53 5.53 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.595 4.095 3.395 3.519 4.019 3.319 2,25 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 46 61 735 74 70 224 1049 Stage 1 406 445 219 252 - - - Stage 2 208 225 - 589 454 - - - - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 22 50 735 63 58 224 1049 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 22 50 - 63 58 - - - - Stage 1 403 371 - 217 250 - - - - Stage 2 113 223 481 378 - - - " .,• �," '` €''�. - '�` e ��. t�!? axe aurE � �,-g---�.. ��.� ��x���. � r ,;,¢ ` � E�'. HCM Control Delay,s 10 103.5 0.1 - HCM LOS B F - Capacity(veh/h) 1049 - - 735 63 224 539 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 - 0.019 0.983 0.451 0.167 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 8.5 - 10 217.5 33.6 13 HCM Lane LOS A - B F DB - - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 4.8 2.2 0.6 Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report EPost-Development AM Peak Hour Page 1 I _ HCM 2010 TWSC 1: SW SHADY LANE & SW GREENBURG ROAD 6/3/2014 yea-. Int Delay,s/veh Vol,veh/h 83 425 26 — Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 _ Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None Storage Length 100 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - — Grade,% - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 — Heavy Vehicles,% 66 6 Mvmt Flow 90 <_ 462 28 — Conflicting Flow All 1258 0 0 Stage 1 — Stage 2 - - Critical Hdwy 4.16 C Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 - - I Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 539 - - Stage 1 - - Stage 2 Platoon blocked,°lo - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 539 - - -- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - Stage 1 IStage'2 - ata° " �,kr HCM Control Delay,s 2 HCM LOS k.q.,:�:ez'.. .-... - :.v .Fam" I I I e Synchro 8 Report PostShady DeveLanlopmentRetail AM Peak Hour Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: SW SHADY LANE & SITE DRIVEWAY 6/3/2014 Int Delay,s/veh 5.1 Vol,veh/h 107 78 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade,% - 0 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 116 85 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 52 0 0 85 0 0 425 369 85 Stage 1 317 317 — Stage 2 - - - - 108 52 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1554 1512 540 560 974 Stage 1 - - - - - 694 654 - Stage 2 897 852 — Platoon blocked,% - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1554 - - 1512 - - 452 516 974 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 452 516 Stage 1 640 603 Stage 2 - - - - - - 799 852 - g' -s.3e<x� �r' s .�;��; 5��» 3�,f. '6�v �.'� r�N�a�� 'si - i �� � � a. e Bs � �a . °.� .� =:i, «.V�.,::� �� zz,a• �' HCM Control Delay,s 4.3 0 0 HCM LOS A -- Capacity(veh/h) - 1554 - - 1512 - - 1016 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.075 - - - - - 0.109 HCM Control Delay(s) 0 7.5 0 0 9 - HCM Lane LOS A A' A A - - A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 0.4 — Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report = Post-Development AM Peak Hour Page 3 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: SW SHADY LANE & SITE DRIVEWAY 6/3/2014 Int Delay,s/veh a� da4ma Vol,veh/h 00 102 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None Storage Length - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 Grade,% 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 111 �Ca�._w.. -�a-�:,h.,�.w�.§... ..�+a,�..«�� «:�a�'�`'.� ';uw:ada:> _._.....,.», .:.��`� „ Conflicting Flow All 369 369 52 Stage 1 52 52 Stage 2 317 317 Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 588 560 1016 Stage 1 961 852 - Stage 2 694 654 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 553 516 1016 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 553 516 - Stage 1 886 852 r Stage 2 640 603 - HCM Control Delay,s 9 HCM LOS A � �� .__,a Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Post-Development AM Peak Hour Page 4 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: SW SHADY LANE & SW GREENBURG ROAD 6/3/2014 Int Delay,s/veh 2.3 { mar.Vol,veh/h 0 0 26 26 0 79 9756 28 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - 0 - - 50 105 - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 25 25 25 0 0 0 3 3 3 Mvmt Flow 0 0 28 28 0 86 10 822 30 Conflicting Flow All 2359 2374 692 1667 2362 837 1384 0 :; 0 Stage 1 1502 1502 857 857 Stage 2 857 872 - 810 1505 - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.675 6.875 7.275 7.3 6.5 6.2 4.16 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.875 5.875 -' 6.1 5.5 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.475 5.875 6.5 5.5 Follow-up Hdwy 3.7375 4.2375 3.5375 3.5 4 3.3 2.23 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 17 27 346 71 36 370 486 Stage 1 108 156 - 355 377 - - Stage 2 311 327 - 344 186 Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 12 24 346 60 33 370 486 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 12 24 - 60 >33 - Stage 1 106 144 348 369 - Stage 2 234 320 291 172 - - - "€��.'�i _.mss .a >- e,�s�, * -� ?�J � z = r >.,x, •_&' e z° #- .M'n',v U a�'.. '' ..s:a�: aus'w.',. HCM Control Delay,s 16.3 40.5 0.1 HCM LOS C E Capacity(veh/h) 486 - - 346 60 370 787 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 - 0.082 0.471 0.232 0.077 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 12.6 - 16.3 109.9 17.6 10 HCM Lane LOS B - CF C A - - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.3 1.8 0.9 0.3 Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Post-Development PM Peak Hour Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 1: SW SHADY LANE & SW GREENBURG ROAD 6/3/2014 Int Delay,s/veh Vol,veh/h 56 1266 7 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized None Storage Length 100 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 Grade,% 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 61 1376 8 lea nk x r d i 1 Conflicting Flow All 852 0; 0 Stage 1 Stage 2 - - - Critical Hdwy 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 787 - Stage 1 - - - Stage 2 Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 787 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - Stage 1 - Stage 2 a� :- a t x a s saw HCM Control Delay,s 0.4 HCM LOS a.»»ta'F:a.. Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Post-Development PM Peak Hour Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: SW SHADY LANE & SITE DRIVEWAY 6/3/2014 Int Delay,s/veh 3.9 ............_.. Vol,veh/h 45 39 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - _ Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 _ -O Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 49 42 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 ; : _ Conflicting Flow All 65 0 0 42 0 0 230 205 42 Stage 1 140 140 Stage 2 - - - - - 90 65 Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - _ Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 6.12 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1537 - - 1567 725 691 1029 Stage 1 - - - - - - 863 781 - Stage 2 _` 917 841 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1537 1567 - - 672 668 1029 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ', - - - - 672 668 Stage 1 - 835 755 Stage 2 - - - - - 872 841 - q ''-''-- dui '''''61'',77'.7:•;;. ag .° '. s" $ x 8` ,-aa :: app SZ HCM Control Delay,s 4 0 0 HCM LOS A ,F,n Capacity(veh/h) - 1537 - - 1567 - - 999 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.032 - - 0.049 HCM Control Delay(s) 0 7.4 0 0 - 8.8 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0 - - 0.2 Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Post-Development PM Peak Hour Page 3 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: SW SHADY LANE & SITE DRIVEWAY 6/3/2014 Int Delay,s/veh Vol,vehlh 0 0 �.45� Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None Storage Length - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 49 .S�ev x ..:«. .-.... .,«......uw:;� «f.«.,- .. =s'`•s' ,. 'Ey mS'� d€e«».s4;:'2`�'' : ... . ««., ,�`: `d'e- " fi;: Conflicting Flow All 205 205 65 Stage 1 65 65 Stage 2 140 140 ` - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5,52 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 753 691 999 Stage 1 946 841 - Stage 2 863 781 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 734 668 999 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 734 668 - Stage 1 915 841 Stage 2 835 755 - HCM Control Delay,s 8.8 HCM LOS A •'�:` �.. `''��'3"'�, ���''xt�a-'3. :ea air r Shady Lane Retail Synchro 8 Report Post-Development PM Peak Hour Page 4 ` | . MACKENZIE . DESIGN DRIVEN / CLIENT FOCUSED _ , �� �� April 28 2014 Neighbor Re: Shady Lane Retail Development Neighborhood Meeting Project Number 2130043.16 ' OearNe�hbor IMackenzie is representing the owner of the property located at 9785 SW Shady Lane. We are considering proposing a Site Development Review for some exterior and interior modifications to the existing site and building at this location, I Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary land use approvals,we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents.You are invited to attend a meeting. Monday, May 12, 2014 Symposium Coffee 1Z34SSVVMain Street Tigard, OR 97223 6:00 PM Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call (503) 224-9560 if you have any I questions. Sincerely, gp �� ^, 40000 ^yanSchera ^ ` Land Use Planner Enclosures:Vicinity Map Preliminary Site Plan r503.224.9560 • F 503.228.1285 • vvmcxwzszom • nxe,ssstCenter,151sSsWater Avenue,#1muPortland,oaer214 sn.�s ` n".`°°".o,=.= ' `="","~`^°°.°s ' ,v°""s"n=.o~,`^°mws ` L°w�pA,c^"ce.,sr,v"c � � m pv,nao4�meon ~ m"cvv"e^*�^mnown ~ s,°�/�.w�mme,^n \\FL1\Projects\Projects\213004316\WP\LTR\LTR-Shady Lane Retail Development Neighborhood Meeting-140428.docx ea Eli) mile Ira mile wile will alio ''''''' ull. ail' mull all ail' mill, Ill. la .I. ... . . , Drive-Thru Retail Site&Vicinity SW Oak St •', • . .......„ ...„. (f , 9785 SW Shady Lane 41.1 Tigai'd Oregon , ,... , -•$.9, , ! 1 . , < . .,, ... - , , 1 '-• - .:-. ,,,,..,„,..... . 1 t , . ,, _ 1 .„•,„ ;4t,IIiI.7`4, If, ,f•I't.. • .ft, SITE .., 7 .. ,.... I ,... _ _ 0.44 AC 19,382 SF , - 5.111 1 tndtt—150 feet I . " I soya.oats SW Shady Ln SW Cascade Blvd i ,.., 1 ,,, I ' Q•>- , , 1 1 Ic1/4 Iel; el .&;;4`,..• I i '',1- ' ;, gl: -W.1\iiandan y , , 4 ' , „, : ' Open treetAlep(an ,, 1 ,, til L......o... /conInbuto!fi.cb-By-s MACKEI'siZIE. ! i ... , -- .4 _ __ _ ---t ... , , © C 1 , - , , - (Li , -• 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIIIIIIIIIIPUII111 I III111 1E i 1 r , `/ /:; w _ 1 ,. --.– [ T RI DLN AT.tnNG SDR NL/ i i 5GWMIDT EXI9T'4 N.¢NDGo ANL TOOI /p/ V� / SLOG. 'aDL.oaBa ,11 .AX isOinm.-rnw 'N< Al 8F Y , \ \''741111111E illaill- I. 4". \8q1.10.1 MEM.. I / ,C , gil IN Mir aL( a/ If I mi- ` k ® QzQ6 / I -r 16 Q o � C = Y p / I i, I p tn U' / P s , — CaQ / - _ – ' ■_ r al I III BLL SHADY LANE P JEGT ND – — – -C 19187 OW r1.040M• SITE PLAN - OPTION B ; R.VUION• - a lb y .. SP AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING/POSTING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE CITY OF TIGARD A COPY OF TI-IE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE,TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223-8189 IN ADDITION,THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT&COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: f I, Sl, l 5472,0,6e,41 ,being duly sworn,depose and say that on the, 2t" day of _ ..._. , 20 f'4 ,1 caused to have mailedi to each of the persons on the attached list,a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) e}' c Stir)SW..4ti 1.+1 a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a p�t of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in c velopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 11.6 Zo F 144' rivt, Igrtt4 j t DR., F with postage prepaid thereon. U.../1 L,/,'Cil,„ --, Si tune (Into presence of a Notary Public) POSTING: I, SL VVJJ . l 3 , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed land use application for J _ 5.-;i IXitti opener& AAA) affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s)IF no address(s)and all tax lot(s)currently registered) 1.445' S'i,j Sha,,(,t,,l LGwt.c. and did on the 2.4 day of ► 7!',9 ,20 IM personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a ci'l.C. r(Lt Y1L/t,lr` t' t/!'R✓ land use application,and die dine,date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at OA - Ivy C.k Quin tt✓1.K- Iglu Oy I'"L S t k. icklthi.t""..:tt . )d, .,idle .y � 2 (State the location you posted notice on property) f .�. J OA fir , .r/ i. ' tune (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF 0 Y ) County of t..{,„4,k, )ss. Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the CA day of Ay rt t, ,20 )4 ♦'+, OFFICIAL SEAL %� = REBECCA LYNN BRANDY r ;! '41 rtf. NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON COMMISSION N0.469805 My Commission Expires: 0?/0g1'�((p MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 08 2016 r\c.rpht\masren\neighborhood meetings\affidavit of mailing-posting neighborhood meeting doc [Type text] S1r� �n T S\Ae.6+- Suzannah Stanley Subject: FW: MAJ Shady Lane - Neighborhood Meeting Recap From: Ryan Schera Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 6:30 AM To: Rick Tiland; Grant Hunter Cc: Dave Larson; Elena Hopper; Mike Jenkins; Suzannah Stanley Subject: MAJ Shady Lane - Neighborhood Meeting Recap All—The neighborhood meeting went well last night. One person showed (owner across the street to the south). Nice old guy just curious about what was going in next door. He thought the site was ideal for the use and is looking forward to Starbucks moving in. -Ryan ' 1 O 11111 1 r 111111 O IIIIIII SIN 1.1111 IIIA BLACK ALUM. STOREFRONT WINDOW PANTED BRICK PAINTED BRICK PANTED METAL PANTED METAL w/CLEAR GLAZING 4 t)IK SIGN PYLON Mill.. 1.11. 1.M.°° glaiggill ii.... _1 5 ` SIGN PYLON PANEL CANOPY ��-(--_...::. WALL SCONCE - IEEE" I• __ __ BLACK DRIVE-UP WINDOW - ---■- 1111111 IIIIJI' EXISTG.SIDING - RE-PURPOSED RE-PURPOSED CLEAR FINISH BLACK ALUM. PAINTED WOOD SIDING WOOD SIDING FULL LIGHT WOOD STOREFRONT DOOR w/CLEAR GLAZING west elevation south elevation a!� EXISTG.SIDING - EXISTG.SIDING - EXISTG.FASCIA- } { PAINTED PAINTED PAINTED EXISTG.BRICK- PAINTED 1 IK-- EXISTG.BRICK- CLEAR FINISH EXISTG.CMU `EXISTG.METAL PAINTED FULL LIGHT WOOD SCREEN WALL - PANEL - PAINTED DOOR PAINTED east elevation north elevation retail @ shady lane elevations MAJ DGVGLO/MINT CORPORATION TILAND/6LNMIDT ARONITGLT6.AC 11111/ NM IIIII ■■I I 1 -- _ ®1/�z�/1r•� -7 - I n 111 ■m lii�liim IM1 �! '4 --, - 1/4" d* .� 4 �l \ S, I retail @ shady lane floor plan li, MAJ DGVGLOPMGNT CORPORATION TILAND/6GNMIDT ARLM ITGGT6,PC. / / , / / , / . / . /.- I i ; EXISTING i I ��u BUILDING i 1 0 �41 �' NEW: 41 SF. i 'L/ k / % i / (4 ' :I:I t nE ■ • IJ • ( L Li • • 'I \ / \ SW SHADY LANE retail @ shady lane site plan MAJ DCV CLO rM GNT GOR►ORATION TILAND/6GHMIDT ARCHITECTS,PG MACKENZ1E w DESIGN DRIVEN i CLIENT FOCUSED 1 1 PRELIMINARY 1 STORMWATER Alto PRS REPORT 44/ To IC Ge ( City of Tigard scli 5 Igo. 1t`.f "}?T! FRFO." For Retail at Shady Lane t : 42/31 Submitted June 2,2014 Project Number 2130043.15 MAC:KENZIE Since 1960 Heritage Building 601 Main Street,Suite 101,Vancouver,WA 98660 1011 T360.695.7879 I T360.693.6637 I www.mcknze.com r 1 1 I A. PROJECT OVERVIEW ' The project site is located at 9785 SW Shady Lane near SW Greenberg Road and Hwy 217 in, Tigard Oregon. The site is described as Township 1S, Range 1N, in Section 35BD. The property is currently developed with one building and associated parking. The site is bounded to the west by SW Greenberg Road, Highway 217 to the north and SW Shady Lane to the south. The project is bordered on the east by a medical office building. The site consists of 16,013 sf of impervious area. The on-site topography consists of mild slopes. Generally, the site slopes to two catch basins. One located in the SE and one in the SW corner of the site in the parking lot. ' The site currently has large areas of asphalt that has been overlaid with wood chips. The project proposed to remove the wood chips and excess asphalt. The redeveloped conditions will reduce the percentage of impervious area for the site from 82.7% to ' 68.7%. Along with planting of trees per the new tree code the discharge from the site will be reduced. Since no known issues are present no further detention is proposed. t The existing storm catch basins are each proposed to be replaced with a Contech Storm Filter Catch Basin to provide water quality for the site. Due to the relative shallow stormline the 18" filters have been choosen. This will require 2.3' of fall from the catch basin rim to the invert elevation of the outlet pipe. Each catch basin will treat ' approximately one half of the existing impervious area. 7,000 sf of impervious area creates a flow rate of 0.14 cfs that needs to be treated based on Cleanwater Services Summer storm event based on 0.36 inches falling in a four hour period. Therefore, each catch basin will need to treat 0.14 cfs. However, each storm filter can treat 15 gpm or 0.033 cfs. Therefore, the filters are adequately sized to treat storm ' water. Required treatment 1 7,000* sf x 0.36in/4 hours x 1 ft/12in x 1hr/3600s = 0.14 cfs ' *Greater than half of redeveloped impervious area. Filter capacity 15 gal/min x 1 min/60s x 1 cf/7.48 gals = 0.03 cfs MACKENZIE Since 1960 Heritage Building 1601 Main St I Vancouver,WA 98660 T 360.695.7879 I F 360.693.6637 I www.grpmack.com PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six (6) Months) TIGARD ✓:,pike /j PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: 1-9-2014 14_e:k STAFF AT PRE-APP.: GBP/MM 4-71-e. T 1-7 IL 4.)°i/.3 041;7` NON-RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: Patrick Tiland,Tiland-Schmidt Assocs. AGENT: Phone: (503) 220-8517 Phone: PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 9785 SW Shady Lane TAX MAP(S)/LOT#(S): 1S135BD 00200 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: SDR Site Development Review PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Coffee Shop with drive through window and associated site improvements COMPREHENSIVE PLAN e n� y.�`"«k "� ES?', t; i t-j:49 MAP DESIGNATION: Mixed Use Commercial ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: MUC ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.) MINIMUM LOT SIZE: None. Average Min.lot width: None. Max. building height: 200 ft.;Min. 2 stories Setbacks: Front: 0 ft(Max. 10 ft). Side: 0 ft. Rear: 0 ft. Corner: 0 ft. from street. MAXIMUM SI IE COVERAGE: 85%. Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 15%. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET, IN 1'ERESTED PARTIES, AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. * NOTE: In order to also preliminarily address building code standards, a meeting with a Plans Examiner is encouraged prior to submittal of a land use application. ® NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18.390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NUN-Residential Application/Planning Division Section 4 Z IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18.390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system,the parks system,the water system,the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ® ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765) Minimum number of accesses: 1. Minimum access width:30 ft. Minimum pavement width: 24 ft. All driveways and parking areas,except for some fleet storage parking areas,must be paved. Drive-in use queuing areas: 200 ft. ® WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. D SPECIAL SETBACKS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.730) ➢ STREETS: feet from the centerline of ➢ LOWER INTENSITY ZONES: feet,along the site's boundary. ➢ FLAG LOT: 10-FOOT SIDE YARD SE 1 BACK. El SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS (Refer to Code Section 18.730.020.B.) BUILDING HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS -Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided that: it. A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; ► All actual building setbacks will be at least half(1/2) of the building's height; and P. The structure will not abut a residential zoned district. ® BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745& 18.620) In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. The ESTIMATED REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTHS applicable to your proposal area are: n/a feet along north boundary. n/afeet along east boundary. n/a feet along south boundary. n/a feet along west boundary. IN ADDITION,SIGHT OBSCURING SCREENING IS REQUIRED ALONG: all parking areas. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 N( )N Residential Application/Planning Division Section SCREENING: SPECIAL PROVISIONS- 18.745.050E Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas is required per specifications in section 17.745.050E (1). In no cases shall nonconforming screening of parking and loading areas be permitted to become any less conforming. In addition, screening of service facilities and refuse areas also applies to all development with the exception of one and two family dwellings. ® LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.745, 18.765 and 18.620) STREET TREES SHALL BE REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR A TYPE I CONDITIONAL USE MINOR MODIFICATION, TYPE I SI IE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MINOR MODIFICATION, ANY TYPE II AND TYPE III LAND USE REVIEW. The minimum number of required street trees shall be determined by dividing the linear amount of street frontage within or adjacent to the site (in feet) by 40 feet (if the number is a fraction, round to the nearest whole number). The trees shall be placed within the public right-of-way whenever possible but no more than six (6) feet from the right-of-way boundary. Street trees shall be planted according to Section 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual and adequate soil volumes shall be provided in accordance with Section 12 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Existing trees may be used to meet the street standards. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. All parking areas,including parking spaces and aisles, shall be required to achieve at least 30% tree canopy cover at maturity directly above the parking area in accordance with Section 13 of the Urban Forestry Manual. ® RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a clear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at(503) 625-6177. ® PARKING (Refer to Code Section 18.765.040) l l 9/(� SF fi-duo (c Syi1ESSv r3��'s) REQUIRED parking for this type of use: eating and drinking establishment: 9 spaces/1000 sf, 2.46 sf x 9 = 22.14 spaces;fast food: 7 spaces/1000 sf N2.46 = 17.22 spaces. Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s): 18 spaces 8/1 3 - , i t3 (22/‘,6.) SECONDARY USE REQUIRED parking: ,2 o T. W19 r�- Z f Parking SHOWN on preliminary plan(s):. NO MORE THAN 50% OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. PARKING STALLS shall be dimensioned as follows: O. Standard parking space dimensions: 8 feet,6 inches x 18 feet, 6 inches. P Compact parking space dimensions: 7 feet, 6 inches x 16 feet,6 inches. Note: Parking space width includes the width of a stripe that separates the parking space from an adjoining space. Note: A maximum of three (3)feet of the vehicle overhang area in front of a wheel stop or curb can be included as part of required parking space depth. This area cannot be included as landscaping for meeting the minimum percentage requirements. HANDICAPPED PARKING: ▪ All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions,is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ▪ BICYCLE RACKS ARE REQUIRED FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. ❑ LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.765.080) Every COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN EXCESS OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET shall be CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 N()N-Residential Application/Planning Division Section provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. ® BICYCLE RACKS (Refer to Code Section 18.765) BICYCLE RACKS are required FOR MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. REQUIRED bicycle racks for this type of use: .2/1000sf= .2x 7.5 =1.5 (minimum 2 spaces) ❑ SENSITIVE LANDS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.775) The Code provides REGULATIONS FOR LANDS WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT DUE TO AREAS WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN, NATURAL DRAINAGEWAYS,WETLAND AREAS, ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25 PERCENT,OR ON UNSTABLE GROUND. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive land areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.775 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROHIBITED WITHIN FLOODPLAINS. ❑ STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. ® CLEAN WATER SERVICES (CWS) BUFFER STANDARDS (Refer to CWS R&O 07-20/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) LAND DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO SENSITIVE AREAS shall preserve and maintain or create a vegetated corridor for a buffer wide enough to protect the water quality functioning of the sensitive area. Design Criteria: The VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTH is dependent on the sensitive area. The following table identifies the required widths: TABLE 3.1 VEGETATED CORRIDOR WIDTHS SOURCE: CWS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL/RESOLUTION&ORDER 07-20 SENSITIVE AREA DEFINITION SLOPE ADJACENT WIDTH OF VEGETATED TO SENSITIVE AREA4 CORRIDOR PER SIDES • Streams with intermittent flow draining: <25% I 10 to <50 acres 15 feet I >50 to <100 acres 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands <0.5 acre 25 feet • Existing or created wetlands>0.5 acre <25% 50 feet • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres • Natural lakes and ponds • Streams with intermittent flow draining: >25% I 10 to <50 acres 30 feet I >50 to <100 acres 50 feet • Existing or created wetlands >25% Variable from 50-200 feet. Measure in 25- • Rivers,streams,and springs with year-round flow foot increments from the starting point to • Streams with intermittent flow draining>100 acres the top of ravine (break in <25%slope), • Natural lakes and ponds add 35 feet past the top of ravine' astarting point for measurement=edge of the defined channel(bankful flow) for streams/rivers,delineated wetland boundary,delineated spring boundary,and/or average high water for lakes or ponds,whichever offers greatest resource protection. Intermittent springs,located a minimum of 15 feet within the river/stream or wetland vegetated corridor,shall not serve as a starting point for measurement. CIT 'OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 N(IN-Residential Application/Planning Division Section 'Vegetated corridor averaging or reduction is allowed only when the vegetated corridor is certified to be in a marginal or degraded condition. °The vegetated corridor extends 35 feet from the top of the ravine and sets the outer boundary of the vegetated corridor. The 35 feet may be reduced to 15 feet,if a stamped geotechnical report confirms slope stability shall be maintained with the reduced setback from the top of ravine. Restrictions in the Vegetate Corridor: NO structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, dumping of any materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted which otherwise detract from the water quality protection provided by the vegetated corridor, except as provided for in the CWS Design and Construction Standards. Location of Vegetated Corridor: IN ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHICH CREATES MULTIPLE PARCELS or lots intended for separate ownership,such as a subdivision,the vegetated corridor shall be contained in a separate tract,and shall not be a part of any parcel to be used for the construction of a dwelling unit. CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications, the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas,CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. ® SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively,a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. Non-residential developments within the C-G zone shall meet the sign requirements for the commercial zones, 18.780.130C. ® URBAN FORESTRY PLAN (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the "Tree Canopy Requirements" Brochure) AN URBAN FORESTRY PLAN IS REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLWING TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT: Conditional Use (Type III);Downtown Design Review (Type II and III);Minor Land Partition (Type II); Planned Development (Type III); Sensitive Lands Review (Type II and III); Site Development Review (Type II); and Subdivision (Type II and III). The plan needs to be prepared by an ISA certified arborist or landscaped architect. Percentage of mature canopy cover required: 33% (Refer to Appendix 2-6 in Urban Forestry Manual for a list of trees with mature canopy cover areas) An urban forestry plan shall: - Be coordinated and approved by a landscape architect (the project landscape architect) or a person possessing dual certifications as a certified arborist and certified tree risk assessor (the project arborist); - Meet the tree preservation and removal site plan standards in Section 10, part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual; - Meet the tree canopy site plan standards in Section 10,part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual;and - Meet the supplemental report standards in Section 10,part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual. TREE CANOPY FEE. If the effective percentage of tree canopy cover cannot be met, the applicant shall provide the city a tree canopy fee according to the methodology outlined in Section 10, part 4 of the Urban Forestry Manual. 18.790.040-Discretionary Urban Forestry Plan Review Option In lieu of providing payment of a tree canopy fee when less than the standard effective tree canopy cover required by Section 10, part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual will be provided, an applicant may apply for a discretionary urban forestry plan review. The discretionary urban forestry plan review cannot be used to modify an already approved urban forestry plan, any tree preservation or tree planting requirements established as part of another land use review approval, or any tree preservation or tree planting requirements required by another chapter in this title. ® PRESERVATION OF EXISTING TREES (Refer to Code Section 18.790.050.C.) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 N()N-Residential Application/Planning Division Section To assist in the preservation and/or planting of trees and significant tree groves, the director may apply one or more of the following flexible standards as part of the land use review approval. Use of the flexible standards shall be requested by the project arborist or landscape architect as part of the land use review process. The flexible standards are only applicable to trees that are eligible for credit towards the effective tree canopy cover of the site. Appropriate species of trees in good condition and suitable for preservation receive a 200 percent credit based on their existing canopy area. Refer to Section 11-Part 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual for submittal requirements. ® CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE (3) AND EIGHT (8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. ❑ ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.810.060) MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15-foot-wide access easement. The DEPTH OF ALL LOTS SHALL NOT EXCEED 21/2 TIMES THE AVERAGE WIDTH, unless the parcel is less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. CODE CHAPTERS ❑ 18.330(Conditional Use) n 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) ❑ 18.340(Directors Interpretation) ® 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ® 18.765(Off-Street Parking/Loading Requirements) ❑ 18.350(Planned Development) ❑ 18.640(Durham Quarry Design Standards) n 18.775(Sensitive Lands Review) ® 18.360(Site Development Review) ® 18.705(Access/Egress/Circulation) ® 18.780(Signs) ❑ 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.710(Accessory Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Temporary Use Permits) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) ® 18.790(Urban Forestry Plan) ❑ 18.385(Miscellaneous Permits) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ® 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) ® 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/Impact Study) ® 18.725(Environmental Performance Standards) ❑ 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) ❑ 18.410(Lot Line Adjustments) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development Standards) ® 18.810(Street&Utility Improvement Standards) ❑ 18.420(Land Partitions) ❑ 18.740(Historic Overlay) n 18.430(Subdivisions) n 18.742(Home Occupation Permits) n 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) 18.745(Landscaping&Screening Standards) ® 18.520(Commercial Zoning Districts) n 18.750(Manufactured/Mobil Home Regulations) n 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ® 18.755(Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: The proposed eating and drink establishment use is a permitted use in the MUC zone. Application fee for site development review is $5,051; PROCEDURE g Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 Nt)N-Residential Application/Planning Division Section . y APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. The Planning counter closes at 5:00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 81/2" x 11". One,81/2" x 11" map of a proposed project shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the TigardHearings Officer. A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. Land use applications requiring a public hearing must have notice posted on-site by the applicant no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE IN TENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These • pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section • PREPARED BY: Gary Pagenstecher CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: 503-639-4171 FAX: 503-624-3681 DIRECT: 503-718-2434 EMAIL: garyp@tigard-or.gov TITLE 18 (CITY OF TIGARD'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE) INTERNET ADDRESS: www.tigard-or.gov CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NC)N-Residential Application/Planning Division Section PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES � . ➢ DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING City of Tigan,Orogen Community(Development Sdapinglf BetterCommuraty PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Magid 15135811 9785 Shady Retail Tax LOt[si: 200 Use Type: Retail These notes have been prepared based on the information submitted by the applicant showing retail use with a drive-through in a 2,600sf existing building on the subject property at 9785 SW Shady Ln. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a prosection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. This development will need to meet the Street and Utility Improvement Standards of TMC 18.810 along with the Washington Center Regional Center Design Standards of TMC 18.630. Obtaining Sanitary Sewer service to the subject property may be difficult. Our records show the nearest sewer lines being on the far side of Greenburg Rd to the west, and along Ash Creek to the east. As it appears this site was once a service station, pollution and/or hazardous materials issues may exist. Documentation of a clean site may be necessary depending on the records from state agencies and others. Right-of-wav dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® _Shady Ln to a half-width of 30 feet from centerline; it appears that this currently exists. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 5 Dwelopm.nt Englnooring Street improvements: (Subject to rough proportionality) D Partial street improvements and/or future street improvement agreements (where allowed) will be necessary along to include: ❑ pavement half-width of 18 feet ❑ concrete curb ❑ 5-foot planter exclusive of curb ❑ storm sewers and other underground utilities ❑ 8-foot concrete sidewalk ❑ street trees ❑ street signs, traffic control devices, streetlights and a two-year streetlight fee. ❑ Other: Pavement tapers as necessary The existing cross-section of Shady Ln appears to meet standards. Any access modifications would need to meet ADA standards. The type of retail use was not specified, and trip generation rates vary widely depending on the type of retail use. A traffic study may be required, depending on how the trip generation of the proposed development compares to the TMC 18.810 threshold for requiring a traffic study. Coordinate with the City and ODOT to scope the traffic study if a study is necessary. 18.705 Access and Egress 18.730.040 Additional Setback Requirements: This section sets requirements for additional setback distance from roadways. The minimum yard requirement shall be increased in the event a yard abuts a street having a right-of-way width less than required by its functional classification on the city's transportation plan map and, in such case, the setback shall be not less than the setback required by the zone plus one-half of the projected road width as shown on the transportation map. This appears to not be applicable Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) This appears to not be applicable (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, if approved by the City Engineer, a fee in-lieu of CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 5 Yw.l.nm.n E.YI...dn/ • undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is approved, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. There are existing overhead utility lines across the street along Shady Ln, for which the fee-in-lieu will be necessary. All new utilities will need to be constructed underground. Sanitary Sewers: The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitary sewer. Our records do not show a sanitary sewer adjacent to the subject property. The nearest lines shown are along Greenburg Rd to the west, and along Ash Creek to the east. The developer will need to verify adequacy for the proposed use and pay the appropriate connection fees. Contact the Utility Billing staff for connection fees. Water Supply: The Tualatin Valley Water District provides public water service in this area. Coordinate with TVWD for information regarding adequate water supply and appropriate connection requirements for the proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District [Contact: John Wolff, 503-259-1504] provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Provide a plan that shows how the storm drainage system for the site connects to the public system. Storm drainage plan and calculations shall be submitted with the application for it to be considered complete. Storm water detention will required if there is a net increase in impervious area. Storm water detention facilities must be reviewed and approved by the city. Storm water detention calculations shall be submitted to the Development Engineer for review and approval. Storm drainage must connect to a public system of adequate capacity or discharge to a suitable outfall location meeting appropriate standards (such as CWS). Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 5 gevelopmentEngineering • provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in- lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof. Please contact the Building Division for the current fee. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ® Construction of an on-site water quality facility. ❑ Payment of the fee in-lieu. Water quality treatment is required if there is a net increase in impervious area. Calculations for sizing of water quality treatment facilities must be submitted to the Development Engineer for review and approval. Water quality facilities also must be reviewed and approved by the city. Review and comply with provisions of Chapter 4 Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Runoff Treatment and Control). Other Comments: Water quality and detention facility design and construction must be certified by a professional engineer as meeting Clean Water Services requirements. After completion of the construction of these facilities, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the city on city-furnished forms for long-term maintenance of the facilities. This agreement will be recorded and city staff will be periodically inspecting the facilities for compliance with the terms of the agreement. TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAX In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) which was replaced in 2008 by a Transportation Development Tax (TDT) that became effective 7/1/09. The TDT program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TDT incorporates the proposed use of the land and the size of the project. The TDT is calculated, due, and payable at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances payment of the TDT may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TDT exceeds the TDT rate for a single-family home. Pay TDT as required. PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from Development Engineering. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in the Permit Center at City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The PFI permit application shall include any on-site water quality and detention facilities that may be required as part of the land use approval. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer CITY OF TIGARD Pre-AppIIcatIon Conference Notes Page 4 of 5 IevelepmeitEngineering Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: NOTE: If an PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. PREPARED BY: Mike McCarthy 1/8/14 DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER DATE Phone: 15031118-2462 E-mail: mikem@tigard-or.gov Revised: March 2012 CITY OF TIGARD Pro-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 5 Isvelopmnt Wowing '.7 -,IF>i, s...7-717-0z9-F- City of Tigard -7--- 145E I°i‘ u I F-‘21 -- ,v , rte( k 4 I- r TDT—COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVEL P NT TAX 11111 TIGARD Rate Calculation Worksheet APPLICANT r7 Ick- /-4.lf!) DATE ) La/1c/ / MAILING ADDRESS 3 ,J, Siv �� PREPARE747# 4 Y J✓ . CITY/ZIP/PHOr /27Z A. b/ (3-71-3T PLANS CHECK;•' f3_.D60 TAX MAP# /5 l 3 5 )SOo Z O PRO ECT TITLE .44 SITUS#ADDRESS pj 7,6 c A/V(5)41M y L A iii 6 2J F FORMER USE(S) r USE ITE # X RATE _ TDT DESCRIPTION/NOTES # CODE UNITS AMOUNT I Tiq 02,oX - -25-5—Z-7( - _ ThigL 1 C at 11IGP.t�`571urou JA4 Y x ' cfI/rt = '/gl'7I, 2_ 41'1 A5314 x = —aa e.g.K 1 eCe (. x = TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) PROPOSED USE(S) USE CODE UNITS ITE # X RATE _ AMOUNT DESCRIPTION/NOTES / 9'3 70 x _=/ 34; Lv 6 No As lio i I G 2 P �• ..x i� = ' ,--lo. ll Ji;t*K-4;V Pra-46/4/14/26)0Ar- 2 g32 k.r.: d-r-u -f x.,a r,44(-', = > 3,474 TOTAL TDT,PROPOS USE(S) if 31 '3 (o -4/2,Fe- /1, idje C 409 vc 9 2 V"' LESS TOTAL TDT,FORMER USE(S) — / / 2Sr ` 9 ./2't. J I e1riw TDT INCREASE/(DEC��FaaSE) ticee (INCREASE=TDT DUES PAYMENT METHOD 4/.7b2--69 -, ' tri CASH/CHECK NOTES 4- Z b'�C. CREDITL _ � BANCROFT AGREEMENT . vHC , Rts•»'9 vaA // ''�xZ 2t(S�/�ieo�o3t iASS (PROMISSORY NOTE) 2 2.5 T`eL Jc Z-415001zoo/w = • 9(ES ' DEFER TO OCCUPANCY �/? 02e yoffri0c/AK%[��#Xrra2E�<ODO��E� ,2e,00A/PaR r�FFS e-00/A(-t- 2. 4 t e . I/OFS/CD/FORMS/TDT Rate Calculation Worksheet.indd(Rev.4/22/09) 24 ee5 l�` /Q,6: 5 40 •`.'"! ai i 1111 •. ° City of Tigard TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Request GENERAL INFORMATION i "�'� TC-A'�d� �`}�{MI t7-1- / b ' 4 ' {FOR STAFF USE ONLY 1 Applicant: Q/�I a-t .1�'�� 1,L �-`�1 _ Case No.: T �I�J—Q �q X 4 1 Address: 'iP I t 1417.07;i0 .AJJEBhone: 2W -$.." ‘l Fee: (.SSI.t.0 City: '7011T I,..,AL F-417 Zip: 9-2 2.. 1 Receipt No.: tel1 M 5.0, Application Accepted By: itK Contact Person: I C-.10"1 Phone: 2 'a 11 Date: 12.4 3D ( 13 us DATE OF PRE-APP.: 11911 Property Owner/Deed Holder(s): TIME OF PRE-APP.: 1O "'"" 1'1S.t—.lLM6r 'i .' zz,o-sem PRE-APP.HELD WITH: Address: Phone: Rev.6/24/2013 e\curpin\masters\land use applications\Pre-App Request App.doc City: Zip: Property Address/Location(s): C77oS ‘'ALJG} .41•47y' 1,— T A.42-47 REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS ��- (Note: applications will n_Qt be accepted Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): 1 1?J�JP719z'2-47') � without the required submittal elements) 1- G 1 Pre-Application Conf.Request Form Zoning: 6 COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING: Site Size: 19 /3 v 2—'4 4 Brief Description of the Proposal and any site-specific questions/issues that you would like to have staff research prior to the PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE INFORMATION meeting. 1 All of the information identified on this form are required to be submitted by JZI Site Plan. The site plan must show the the applicant and received by the Planning Division a minimum of one(1)week proposed lots and/or building layouts drawn prior to officially scheduling a pre-application conference date/time to allow to scale. Also, show the location of the staff ample time to prepare for the meeting. subject property in relation to the nearest streets;and the locations of driveways on the' A pre-application conference can usually be scheduled within 1-2 weeks of the subject property and across the street. Planning Division's receipt of the request for either Tuesday or Thursday , Vicinity Map. mornings. Pre-application conferences are one (1) hour long and are typically held between the hours of 9:00-11:00 AM. ,i The Proposed Uses. 0 Topographic Information. Include Contour PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCES MUST BE SCHEDULED IN Lines if Possible. PERSON AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNTER FROM 8:00-4:00/MONDAY-THURSDAY. 0 Filing Fee 1 IF MORE THAN 4 PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO ATTEND THE PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IN YOUR GROUP, PLEASE INFORM THE CITY IN ADVANCE SO THAT ALTERNATE ROOM ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE GROUP. City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of I TILL A N D / SCNMIOT rweri..a g'yi E vimam ex�i mIs Ex15T'G_ EXIST'G_ � � :. CONC. .e.rsmn,vm / F.� PATIO BLDG. \ / ") Ll1 17)4' /// Z / / of SZz EXIST'G.A.D. O a N 6 PAVED AREA@ N Q H Q °I_ // _11-A_, (Y _ _ _ _ ' _ _ ' /7_ [1 / PROJECT NO. S.W.SHADY LANE 13131 DATE. DRAM BY- GAN 0.Tu Eo BY. I SITE PLAN TOTAL IMPERVIO115 AREA: 15,954 5F. EX / / / , L T I L A N D / / / SRa uNrMarDrc. �: E X ST'G. BLDG. 3rn eu�rr3o..c SOME 2m • roRr�.ro.as SIM 220-85-11 nr / °� #' 1 ' NEW 47 , . 164 SF. I %/ A Z / /i 1 /, ® J w ♦ Q QZ \ 1 1 w. 8 4 0 w 1� _ CI) N / \ Yr ■ @ N Q f 1 _1 m 1- w S.W.1 Al SHADY LANE PROJECT NO. 13191 Q-30-.3 // CUECKfD er, Pli RE vIf iOR] SITE PLAN eit i . TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA. 12,36I SF. -- A a 'Mag-' ' PROJECTDESCRIPTION: RE-PURPOfiE AN OLD GAS STATION M._,„,...W„y LOCATION CURRENTLY BEING USED TO SELL OUTDOOR RAY EOUIPMENT INTO A _ COFFEE SI-10PWTN DRIVE-UP SERVICE �� q AND ON SITE SERVICE.WORK TO INCLUDE -111111‘.- A SMALL ADDITION N COMPLIANCE WITH +� CHAPTER 15.160 1 19830030. ^ VICINITY MAP ' PROPOSED USE. `OFFEE SHOP ANDD ASSOCIATED SITE WITH IMPROVEME-UP NTS.l i N.T.S.N.T . Frontl DSTS Subject: PRE2013-00049 Shady Lane Retail Pre-application Conferences Location: CR 1 Permit Center Start: (,Thu 1/9/2014 10:00 AM I End: Thu 1/9/2014-11:G0 AM Show Time As: Tentative Recurrence: Weekly Recurrence Pattern: every Tuesday and Thursday from 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM Meeting Status: Not yet responded Organizer: -Pre-Apps_CD_Meetings Required Attendees: #Pre-Application-Conferences Resources: CR - 1 Permit Center 2H � o 5F '3u ►tL "JQ. ) L,1Up SF cove—ft- 3 OVETL3 5 [_,0 5 F 7u T�+� ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS c t "( S/)42o/S/-��,..S CITY OF TIGARD RECEIPT 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 T[GARD Receipt Number: 198522 - 11/24/2014 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER PAID SDR2014-00003 Inventory Fee-Open Grown Tree- 1st- 100-0000-43117 $19.00 LRP SDR2014-00003 Inventory Fee-Open Grown Tree-each 100-0000-43116 $308.00 add'I SDR2014-00003 Inventory Fee-Open Grown Tree- 1st 100-0000-43116 $128.00 Total: $455.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK# CC AUTH.CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 1005 GPAGENSTECHE 11/24/2014 $455.00 Payor: MAJ SBUX Tigard LLC Total Payments: $455.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 t • 3 S4e y•03 MACKENZIE . 601 Main Street,Suite 101•Vancouver,WA 98660 TEL:360.695.7879•NET:MCKNZE.COM•FAX:360.693.6637 Letter of Transmittal 54871-1 Date: November 26, 2014 Project Number: 2130043.16 To: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223-8199 Attention: Gary Pagenstecher Project Name: Shady Lane- Land Use and Permitting Assistance Enclosed: Quantity Medium Description Comment 1 Original Landscape Bond For your use Remarks: As required by COA's for SDR2014-00003. Signed: Chad Lawrence Transmitted Via: Delivery If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. MACKENZIE . DESIGN DRIVEN I CLIENT FOCUSED April 24, 2015 City of Tigard Attention:Gary Pagenstecher and Albert Shields 13500 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Shady Lane BUP2014-00257 Tree Protection Measures-Final Inspection#8 Project Number 2130043.15 Dear Gary Pagenstecher and Albert Shields: The final site inspection was performed on April 24, 2015. Construction is complete, all landscape areas have been planted and covered with bark mulch, and tree protection fencing has been removed. The two existing trees were carefully inspected and appear to be in good condition. There were no broken or damaged branches, and each tree has leafed out with a full canopy as expected. The western tree trunk was in good condition, and the eastern tree trunk, which was damaged during construction, has continued to heal nicely. Sincerely, \l\:4 Ronald A. Heiden Landscape Architect Enclosure(s):Tree Protection Measures Inspection#8 Photo Report M503.224.9560 • 503.228 1285 • MCKNZE.COM • u Contor W,,tyr , rruc J,10D,Portland,OF 97214 H:\Projects\213004315\WP\LTR\LTR-City of Tigard-Tree Protection Measures Inspection#8-150424.docx .., . . .... M A C l< E N ,.. i ` 503.224.9560 • 503.228.1285 • ' MCKNZE.0 21 p H OTO REPORT RiverEast Center,1515 SE\Nater Avenin,#100,Po und.OR 9721a Port! no.:)req.� r shr.-- ^ ;c-. PROJECT NUMBER: 2130043.15 ISSUE DATE: April 24, 2015 PROJECT NAME: Shady Lane BUP2014 00257 SUBJECT: Final Tree Protection Measures Inspection#8 (April 24,2015 12:30 PM) � h � in X. i . ;p , _72 „. Y ¢. y 4 • Healing Trunk H:\Projects\213004315\W P\FLD_RPT\PR-Shady Lane BUP-#8-150424.docx IN V TIGARD City of Tigard August 21, 2014 MAJ Development Corp c/o Mike Jenkins 300 West 15th Street,Suite 200 Vancouver,WA 98660 RE: Completeness Review- Shady Lane Drive-Through, Case File Nos. SDR2014-00003 Dear Mr. Jenkins: The City received your supplemental application materials for site development review (SDR2014-00003) on August 19, 2014 for the redevelopment of a 0.44 acre parcel located at 9785 SW Shady Lane from a former gas station/playground equipment store into a drive-through coffee shop with associated site improvements. Your application is now deemed complete. The decision target date will be the second week of October. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your application,please don't hesitate to contact me at 503-718-2434. Sincerely, 6� • .14 Gary Pagenstecher Associate Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov II - �1 TIGARD City of Tigard August 7, 2014 MAJ Development Corp c/o Mike Jenkins 300 West 15th Street,Suite 200 Vancouver,WA 98660 RE: Completeness Review- Shady Lane Drive-Through, Case File Nos. SDR2014-00003 Dear Mr.Jenkins: The City received your revised application materials for site development review (SDR2014-00003) on July 28, 2014 for the redevelopment of a 0.44 acre parcel located at 9785 SW Shady Lane from a former gas station/playground equipment store into a drive-through coffee shop with associated site improvements. To complete your application,please submit the following additional information: Application Copies: Please Submit 9 copies of your revised and new materials (including all elements - !'1- 1 Lt V of the submittal, collated and bound). Plan sets may be printed at 11" x 17" size as long as you include 3 copies of large set plans. Also, submit 5 additional copies of your reduced plan sets only (11" x 17"),plus one copy at 8 1/2" x 11" for our records, and a compact disc including all elements of your proposal. Once these copies have been received, your application will be complete. The decision target date will be six weeks from completion. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your application, please don't hesitate to contact me at 503-718-2434. Sincerely, OF Gary Pagenstecher Associate Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov V .11111 TIGARD June 23,2014 City of Tigard MAJ Development Corp c/o Mike Jenkins 300 West 15th Street,Suite 200 Vancouver,WA 98660 RE: Completeness Review- Shady Lane Drive-Through, Case File Nos. SDR2014-00003 Dear Mr.Jenkins: The City received your application for site development review (SDR2014-00003) on June 4, 2014 for the redevelopment of a 0.44 acre parcel located at 9785 SW Shady Lane from a former gas station/playground equipment store into a drive-through coffee shop with associated site improvements. Please submit the following additional information to complete your application: Proof of Ownership: Your application did not include a required deed or proof of ownership. Pre-Application Conference Notes: Your submittal did not include copies of the required pre- application conference notes. Washington Square Standards: The narrative findings state that L1 landscaping standards have been d applied. However, the Landscape Plan (Sheet L2.3) does not show an 8-foot landscape area along Shady Lane, or 3 'inch caliper trees. Please revise your plans to meet the standards. Urban Forestry Plan: Your plan set includes L2.0, L2.1, and L2.2 with signature lines that are unsigned. There is no arborist report otherwise provided. Please have the plan sheets signed by the Project Arborist. Public Facility Plan Checklist: Please address any deficiencies identified in the attached Public Facilities Completeness Checklist. Envelopes: You provided two sets of envelopes with your application. The label request was made April 22, 2014 and is good for three months. Provided your application is found substantively complete by July 22nd,these envelopes may be used. Once this additional information is submitted, staff will review the additional materials to determine if the application is substantively complete. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your application,please don't hesitate to contact me at 503-718-2434. Sincerely, Gary Pagenstecher Associate Planner Attachment: Public Facilities Checklist 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN Project: Shady Ln Drive Through COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 6/24/14 GRADING ® Existing and proposed contours shown. ® Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? No ® Adjacent parcel grades shown. • Geotech study submitted? STREET ISSUES ® Right-of-way clearly shown. ® Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. ® Street name(s) shown. ® Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. ® Street profiles shown. O Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo N/A on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ❑ Traffic Impact and/or Access Report Note attached ® Street grades compliant? ® Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width N/A appropriate? O Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown. ❑ Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? N/A WATER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines w/sizes noted? ® Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ® Proposed meter location and size shown? ® Proposed fire protection system shown? STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown? ® Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention provided? ® Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? ® Area for facility match requirements from calcs? Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? N/A The submittal is hereby deemed ❑ COMPLETE ® INCOMPLETE By: %AA Date: 6/24/14 REVISED: 06/25/14 a Completeness Review for Shady Ln Retail Note Applicant's traffic report presumes that proposed i-Fly traffic improvements will precede applicant's project. Consequently,applicant's current application is not approvable until the i-Fly improvements are completed. To be currently approvable, a traffic plan without the proposed i-Fly is also required.